Agenda, regular meeting, first session — Jurupa Valley City Council, April 20, 2023 (part 2 of 3)

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LABORATORY TESTING
METHOD $/TEST

TRIAXIAL TESTS
Unconfined compression strength of cohesive soil (with stress/strain plot, ASTM D2166) ..................................................................................................................135 Unconsolidated undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils (UU, ASTM D2850, USACE Q test, per confining stress) ..........................................170 Consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils, (CU, ASTM D4767, USACE R-bar test) with back pressure saturation & pore water pressure measurement (per confining stress) ........................................375 Consolidated drained triaxial compression test (CD, USACE S), with volume change measurement. Price per soil type below EM 1110-2-1906(X):

Sand or silty sand soils (per confining stress) .........................................375 Silt or clayey sand soils (per confining stress) ........................................500 Clay soils (per confining stress) ..............................................................705 Three-stage triaxial (sand or silty sand soils) ..........................................655 Three-stage triaxial (silt or clayey sand soils) .........................................875 Three-stage triaxial (clay soils) .............................................................1,235 Remolding of test specimens ....................................................................65 METHOD $/TEST

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTS
Triaxial permeability in flexible-wall permeameter with backpressure saturation at one effective stress
(EPA 9100/ASTM D5084, falling head Method C): ................................................310 Each additional effective stress ....................................................................120 Hand trimming of soil samples for horizontal K ..............................................60 Remolding of test specimens .........................................................................65 Permeability of granular soils (ASTM D2434) ..................................................135 Soil suction (filter paper method, ASTM D5298) ....................................................400

SOIL-CEMENT
Moisture-density curve for soil-cement mixtures (ASTM D558) .......................240 Wet-dry durability of soil-cement mixtures (ASTM D559) ¹ ...........................1,205 Compressive strength of molded soil-cement cylinder (ASTM D1633)¹ .............60 Soil-cement remolded specimen (for shear strength, consolidation, etc.) ¹ ............235 ¹ Compaction (ASTM D558 maximum density) should also be performed – not included in above price
METHOD $/TEST

CONCRETE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS
Concrete cylinders compression (ASTM C39) (6” x 12” and 4” x 8”) ................35 Compression, concrete or masonry cores (testing only) ≤6 inch (ASTM C42) ......40 Trimming concrete cores (per core) ...............................................................20 Flexural strength of concrete (simple beam-3rd pt. loading, ASTM C78/CTM 523) .....85 Flexural strength of concrete (simple beam-center pt. loading, ASTM C293/CTM 523) ...85 Non shrink grout cubes (2 inch, ASTM C109/C1107) ............................................25 Drying shrinkage - four readings, up to 90 days, 3 bars (ASTM C157) ...........400 Length of concrete cores (CTM 531) .................................................................40

HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA)
Resistance of compacted HMA to moisture-induced damage
(AASHTO T283/CTM 371) ...........................................................................2,100 Hamburg Wheel, 4 briquettes (modified) (AASHTO T324) ...............................900 Superpave gyratory compaction (AASHTO T312/ASTM D6925) .........................350 Extraction by ignition oven, percent asphalt
(AASHTO T308/ASTM D6307/CTM 382) ............................................................150 Ignition oven correction/correlation values
(AASHTO T308/ASTM D6307/CTM 382) .........................................................1,350 Extraction by centrifuge, percent asphalt (ASTM D2172) ................................150 Gradation of extracted aggregate (AASHTO T30/ASTM D5444/CTM 202) ............135 Stabilometer, S-Value (ASTM D1560/CTM 366) .................................................265 Bituminous mixture preparation (AASHTO R30/CTM 304) ...................................80 Moisture content of HMA (AASHTO T329/ASTM D6037/CTM 370) .........................60 Bulk specific gravity of compacted HMA, molded specimen or cores, uncoated (AASHTO T166/ASTM D2726/CTM 308) ..............................................50 Bulk specific gravity of compacted HMA, molded specimen or cores, paraffin-coated (AASHTO T275/ASTM D1188/CTM 308) .....................................55 Maximum density - Hveem (CTM 308) ............................................................200 Theoretical maximum density and specific gravity of HMA (AASHTO T209/ ASTM D2041/CTM 309) .................................................................................130 Thickness or height of compacted bituminous paving mixture specimens (ASTM D3549) ...............................................................................................40 Wet track abrasion of slurry seal (ASTM D3910) .............................................150 Rubberized asphalt (add to above rates) ........................................................+25% BRICK
Compression - cost for each, 5 required (ASTM C67) .......................................50 Absorption - cost for each, 5 required (ASTM C67) ...........................................50 METHOD $/TEST

AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
Bulk density and voids in aggregates (AASHTO T19/ASTM C29/ CTM 212) ............50 Organic impurities in fine aggregate sand (AASHTO T21/ASTM C40/CTM 213) ....60 LA Rattler-smaller coarse aggregate <1.5” (AASHTO T96/ASTM C131/ CTM 211) ...200 LA Rattler-larger coarse aggregate 1-3” (AASHTO T96/ASTM C535/CTM 211) ....250 Apparent specific gravity of fine aggregate (AASHTO T84/ASTM C128/ CTM 208)...130 Specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate (ASTM C127/CTM 206) >#4 retained .............................................................................................100 Clay lumps, friable particles (AASHTO T112/ASTM C142) ..................................175 Durability Index (AASHTO T210/ASTM D3744/CTM 229) ......................................200 Moisture content of aggregates by oven drying
(AASHTO T255/ASTM C566/CTM 226) ...............................................................40 Uncompacted void content of fine aggregate
(AASHTO T304/ ASTM C1252/ CTM 234) ..........................................................130 Percent of crushed particles (AASHTO T335/ASTM D5821/CTM 205) ..................135 Flat & elongated particles in coarse aggregate (ASTM D4791/CTM 235) ..........215 Cleanness value of coarse aggregate (CTM 227) ...........................................210 Soundness, magnesium (AASHTO T104/ASTM C88/CTM 214) ...........................225 Soundness, sodium (AASHTO T104/ASTM C88/CTM 214) ..................................650

MASONRY
Mortar cylinders 2” x 4” (ASTM C780) ...............................................................30 Grout prisms 3” x 6” (ASTM C1019) ...................................................................30 Masonry cores compression, ≤6” diameter - testing only (ASTM C42) .............40 Masonry core shear testing (Title 24) .............................................................80 Veneer bond strength, cost for each - 5 required (ASTM C482) ........................55 CMU compression to size 8” x 8” x 16” - 3 required (ASTM C140) ....................55 CMU moisture content, absorption & unit weight - 6 required (ASTM C140) .....50 CMU linear drying shrinkage (ASTM C426) .....................................................175 CMU grouted prisms compression test ≤8” x 8” x 16” (ASTM C1314) .............200 CMU grouted prisms compression test > 8” x 8” x 16”(ASTM C1314) .............250

BEARING PADS/PLATES AND JOINT SEAL
Elastomeric bearing pads (Caltrans SS 51-3) ...................................................990 Elastomeric bearing pad with hardness and compression tests (Caltrans SS 51-3) ......................................................................................1,230 Type A Joint Seals (Caltrans SS 51-2) ...........................................................1,620 Type B Joint Seals (Caltrans SS 51-2) ...........................................................1,530 Bearing plates (A536) .....................................................................................720 - X

FEE SCHEDULE

Page 3 of 4 ends

EQUIPMENT LIST
METHOD $/TEST

REINFORCING STEEL AND PRESTRESSING STRANDS
Rebar tensile test, ≤ up to No. 11 (ASTM A370) ................................................65 Rebar tensile test, ≥ No. 14 & over (ASTM A370) ...........................................200 Rebar bend test, up to No. 11 (ASTM A370) ......................................................65 Rebar bend test, ≥ No. 14 & over (ASTM A370) ..............................................200 Resistance butt-welded hoops/bars, tensile test, ≤ up to No. 10 (CTM 670) ....65 Resistance butt-welded hoops/bars, tensile test, ≥ No. 11 & over (CTM 670) ...85 Mechanical rebar splice, tensile test, ≤ up to No. 11 (CTM 670).......................65 Mechanical rebar splice, slip test, ≤ up to No. 11 (CTM 670)............................40 Mechanical rebar splice, tensile test, ≥ No. 14 & over (CTM 670) ..................200 Mechanical rebar splice, slip test, ≥ No. 14 & over (CTM 670) .......................200 Headed rebar splice, tensile test, ≤ up to No. 11 (CTM 670) ............................65 Headed rebar splice, tensile test, ≥ No. 14 & over (CTM 670) .......................200 Epoxy coated rebar/dowel film thickness (coating) test (ASTM A775/A934) .......45 Epoxy coated rebar/dowel continuity (Holiday) test (ASTM A775/A934) .............65 Epoxy coated rebar flexibility/bend test, up to No. 11 (ASTM A775/A934) ..........45 Prestressing wire, tension (ASTM A416) .........................................................175 Sample preparation (cutting) .........................................................................50 METHOD $/TEST

STREET LIGHTS/SIGNALS
LED Luminaires / Signal Modules / Countdown Pedestrian Signal Face Modules (Caltrans RSS 86)........................................................................1,300

SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING
Unit weight (density, ASTM E605) ........................................................................60

FASTENERS / BOLTS / RODS
F3125 GR A307, A325 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, plain (ASTM A370) .................................................................................................65 F3125 GR A307, A325 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, galvanized (ASTM A370) ...............................................................................75 A490 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, plain (ASTM A370) ................65 A490 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, galvanized (ASTM A370) ......75 A593 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, stainless steel (ASTM A370) ...65 F1554 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, plain (ASTM A370) ............100 F1554 Bolts, tensile test, ≤ up to 1-1/4” diameter, galvanized (ASTM A370) ...120

SAMPLE TRANSPORT
Pick-up & delivery (weekdays, per trip, <50 mile radius from Leighton office) ...90 ITEM $ UNIT
1/4 inch Grab plates ................................................................................5 each 1/4 inch Tubing (bonded) ....................................................................0.55 foot 1/4 inch Tubing (single) ......................................................................0.35 foot 3/8 inch Tubing, clear vinyl ................................................................0.55 foot 4-Gas meter (RKI Eagle or similar)/GEM 2000 ...................................130 day Air flow meter and purge pump (200 cc/min) .........................................50 day Box of 24 soil drive-sample rings .........................................................120 box Brass sample tubes ...............................................................................10 each Caution tape (1000-foot roll) ..................................................................20 each Combination lock or padlock ................................................................. 11 each Compressed air tank and regulator .......................................................50 day Concrete coring machine (≤6-inch-dia) ...............................................150 day Consumables (gloves, rope, soap, tape, etc.) .......................................35 day Core sample boxes ................................................................................11 each Crack monitor Two-Dimensional ............................................................25 each Crack monitor Thee-Dimensional ..........................................................30 each Cutoff saws, reciprocating, electric (Sawzall®) .....................................75 day D-Meter Walking Floor Profiler ............................................................100 day Disposable bailers .................................................................................12 each Disposable bladders ..............................................................................10 each Dissolved oxygen meter ........................................................................45 day DOT 55-gallon containment drum with lid .............................................65 drum Double-ring infiltrometer ......................................................................125 day Dual-stage interface probe ....................................................................80 day Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ..............................................................400 day Generator, portable gasoline fueled, 3,500 watts ..................................90 day Global Positioning System/Laser Range Finder ....................................80 day Hand auger set ......................................................................................90 day HDPE safety fence (≤100 feet) .............................................................40 roll Horiba U-51 water quality meter ..........................................................135 day Light tower (towable vertical mast) ......................................................150 day Magnehelic gauge .................................................................................15 day Manometer ............................................................................................25 day Mileage (IRS Allowable) ...................................................................0.625 mile ITEM $ UNIT
Moisture test kit (excludes labor to perform test, ASTM E1907) ...........60 test Nuclear moisture and density gauge ....................................................88 day Electrical moisture and density gauge ..................................................88 Day Pachometer ...........................................................................................25 day Particulate Monitor ...............................................................................125 day pH/Conductivity/Temperature meter ......................................................55 day Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) ...........................................................120 day Pump, Typhoon 2 or 4 stage .................................................................50 day QED bladder pump w/QED control box ...............................................160 day Quire fee – Phase I only ......................................................................200 each Resistivity field meter and pins ..............................................................50 day Slip / threaded cap, 2-inch or 4-inch diameter, PVC Schedule 40 .........15 each Slope inclinometer ...............................................................................200 day Soil sampling T-handle (Encore) ...........................................................10 day Soil sampling tripod ...............................................................................35 day Speedy (R) moisture tester ......................................................................5 day Stainless steel bailer ..............................................................................40 day Submersible pump, 10 gpm, high powered Grundfos
2-inch with controller ....................................................................... 160 day Submersible pump/transfer pump, 10-25 gpm ......................................50 day Support service truck usage (well installation, etc.) .............................200 day Survey/fence stakes ................................................................................8 each Tedlar® bags .........................................................................................18 each Traffic cones (≤25)/barricades (single lane) .......................................... 50 day Turbidity meter ......................................................................................70 day Tyvek® suit (each) .................................................................................18 each Vapor sampling box ...............................................................................55 day Vehicle usage (carrying equipment) ......................................................20 hour VelociCalc ..............................................................................................35 day Visqueen (20 x 100 feet) .....................................................................100 roll Water level indicator (electronic well sounder) <300 feet deep well ......60 day ZIPLEVEL® ...........................................................................................15 day Other specialized geotechnical and environmental testing and monitoring equipment are available, and priced per site
- X
Fee/2022 www.leightongroup.com Page 4 of 4

FEE SCHEDULE

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
z Expiration: This fee schedule is effective through
December 31, 2025 after which remaining work will
be billed at then-current rates.
z Proposal Expiration: Proposals are valid for at
least 30 days, subject to change after 30 days;
unless otherwise stated in an attached proposal.
z Prevailing Wages: Our fees for prevailing wage
work are based upon California prevailing wage
laws and wage determinations. Unless specifically
indicated in our proposal, costs for apprentice are
not included. If we are required to have an
apprentice on your project, additional fees will be
charged.
z Overtime: Standard overtime rate is per California
Labor Law and is billed at 1.5 or 2 times their hourly
billing rate. Overtime rate for non-exempt field
personnel working on a Leighton observed holiday
is billed at 2 times their hourly billing rate. Overtime rate for Prevailing wage work is per the California
Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)
determination and is multiplied at 1.5 to 2 times
their hourly billing rate for overtime and double-
time, respectively.
z Expert Witness Time: Expert witness deposition
and testimony will be charged at 2 times hourly
rates listed on the previous pages, with a minimum
charge of four hours per day.
z Minimum Field Hourly Charges: For Field
Technicians, Special Inspectors or any on-site
(field) materials testing services:
4 hours: 4-hour minimum charge up to the first
four hours of work
8 hours: 8-hour minimum charge for over four
hours of work, up to eight hours.

Project time accrued includes portal to portal
travel time.
z Insurance & Limitation of Liability: These rates
are predicated on standard insurance coverage
and a limit of Leighton’s liability equal to our total
fees for a given project.
z Outside Direct Costs: Heavy equipment,
subcontractor fees and expenses, project-specific
permits and/or licenses, project-specific
supplemental insurance, travel, subsistence,
project-specific parking charges, shipping,
reproduction, and other reimbursable expenses will
be invoiced at cost plus 20%, unless billed directly
to and paid by client.
z Invoicing: Invoices are rendered monthly, payable
upon receipt in United States dollars. A service
charge of 1½-percent per month will be charged for
late payment.
z Client Disclosures: Client agrees to provide all
information in Client’s possession about actual or
possible presence of buried utilities and hazardous
materials on the project site, prior to fieldwork,
and agrees to reimburse Leighton for all costs
related to unanticipated discovery of utilities and/or
hazardous materials. Client is also responsible for
providing safe and legal access to the project site
for all Leighton field personnel.
z Earth Material Samples: Quoted testing unit
rates are for soil and/or rock (earth) samples
free of hazardous materials. Additional costs will
accrue beyond these standard testing unit rates
for handling, testing and/or disposing of soil and/or
rock containing hazardous materials. Hazardous
materials will be returned to the site or the site
owner’s designated representative at additional
cost not included in listed unit rates. Standard
turn-around time for geotechnical-laboratory test
results is 10 working days. Samples will be stored
for 2 months, after which they will be discarded.

Prior documented notification is required if samples
need to be stored for a longer time. A monthly
storage fee of $10 per bag and $5 per sleeve or
tube will be applied. Quoted unit rates are only
for earth materials sampled in the United States.

There may be additional cost for handling imported
samples.
z Construction Material Samples: After all
designated 28-day breaks for a given sample
set meet specified compressive or other client-
designated strength, all “hold” cylinders or
specimens will be automatically disposed of,
unless specified in writing prior to the 28-day break.

All other construction materials will be disposed of
after completion of testing and reporting.
- X
Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.F
IN
ITIATION OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:

1. A CHANGE TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ZONING MAP AND

AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR

PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VAN

BUREN BOULEVARD AND JURUPA ROAD AND WEST OF
FELSPAR STREET (JD’S STEAKHOUSE SHOPPING CENTER)

2. A CHANG

E TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ZONING MAP AND

AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR

PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF

LIMONITE AVENUE AND CLAY STREET AND EAST OF PEDLEY

ROAD (DE ANZA PLAZA)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council initiate the following:

1. A Change of Zone and a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment for property located at the northeast corner of Van Buren Boulevard and Jurupa Road and west of Felspar Street (JD’s Steakhouse Shopping Center); and

2. A Change of Zone and a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment for property located at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Clay Street and east of Pedley Road (De Anza Plaza).

BACKGROUND
By law, a City’s Zoning Map must be consistent with its General Plan Land Use Map.

When the City incorporated in 2011, it inherited the County of Riverside’s Zoning and General Plan Land Use Maps for the area of Jurupa Valley. As time progresses and entitlement applications are submitted to the City, inconsistencies between the two maps and actual existing land uses are becoming apparent. There are two locations where these inconsistencies have been recently discovered.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

One of the areas is the shopping center where JD’s Steakhouse is located at 4947 Felspar Street (see Exhibit “A” below). Although the land is developed with a shopping center, it is zoned Manufacturing - Service Commercial (M-SC) and has a General Plan Land Use Map designation of Business Park (B -P) The City should consider a more appropriate commercial General Plan Land Use Designation and zoning classification such as C -R (Commercial Retail ) and C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) zone as the shopping center with the Stater Bros.’ to the east.

Not only are these two maps inconsistent with one another, but t he City would be inconsistent with State Planning and Zoning laws if it were to approve a new discretionary land use application at the center.

Exhibit “A” – JD’s Steakhouse Shopping Center

A similar situation occurs at the De Anza Plaza (shopping center) where the former City Hall and Vicky ’s Restaurant are located (see Exhibit “ B” below). Although it is a commercial shopping center, it has a General Plan Land Use designation of B-P and it is partially zoned Manufacturing- Service Commercial (M -SC). The City should consider changing the B -P designated area to Commercial Retail (C -R) and adopt consistent zoning. In addition, a riparian habitat occurs to the far southeast portion of the sit e but is

Page | 3

erroneously designated as Business Park in the General Plan. The City should consider changing it to Open Space - Conservation.

Exhibit “B” – De Anza Plaza

Changing the Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Map will correct the inconsistencies at these two locations as well as increase the financial viability of the properties. The two actions will also provide compliance with State law.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Initiating these Zone Changes and General Plan Land Use Map Amendments does not require any noticing.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The “Initiation” of any action (or actions) is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City ’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Costs associated with the Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment are covered by the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action : That the City Council initiate a Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment.

Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: J

OE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.G
CI

TY COUNCIL INITIATION OF A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO
TITLES 6 AND 9 TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR MOBILE VENDING; CEQA DETERMINATION: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT AND THE CITY’S LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B) (3)

RECO

MMENDATION
B
y motion, the City Council initiate proceedings to consider a Municipal Code Amendment to Titles 6 and 9 modifying regulations for mobile vending.

BAC

KGROUND
A
substantial number of requests from food trailer (facility) vendors/mobile operators to operate food concessions on private property have been received by the City in recent months. Mobile vending businesses, including concessions food trailers, provide alternative food options citywide, especially in food deserts, and encourage pedestrian - oriented activity while increasing business and tax revenues in the City. However, there are concerns about adequate lighting, sufficient parking, waste disposal, noise, hours of operation, and the general safety of vendors and patrons when operations take place on private property. With thoughtful zoning, development standards, and design standards, the operation of an eating establishment from a mobile vending facility will not be a nuisance use or disrupt the character of a neighborhood or individual property.

ANAL
YSIS
The pur
pose of the Municipal Code amendment related to mobile vending is to create regulations and permit processes for the use in the appropriate zones. Examples of

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

potential amendments to the Code include:

• Add standards for mobile vending facilities on private property to minimize potential negative impacts.
• Add regulations to address multiple mobile vending facilities on a site. • Clarify permit requirements for mobile vending facilities.

Initiation process
A Municipal Code Amendment requires initiation by the City Council. The following considerations apply to the initiation process, which only authorizes the process to begin:

1. Initiation of a Municipal Code Amendment does not entail an evaluation of the merits of the proposed project, but only whether to proceed with a formal evaluation process and public hearings.

2. The Council may express its opinions as to whether the City should proceed with the formal evaluation process but should reserve its opinions regarding the merits or the ultimate action on the item until the evaluation process and public hearings have been completed.

3. The only issue before the Council currently is whether or not to initiate the Municipal Code Amendment. Once the formal evaluation process and public hearings are completed, the City Council will have the opportunity to approve or disapprove or make changes to the Municipal Code.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
There is no requirement for public notice for an initiation of a Zoning Code Amendment.

Public notices for the public hearings of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment will be conducted on future dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Initiation of a code amendment is not subject to CEQA.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The expenses related to the proposed code amendment would be paid from the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Initiate proceedings to consider.

2. Decline to initiate the Municipal Code Amendment at this time.

3. Defer action and request additional information.

Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.H
CI

TY COUNCIL INITIATION OF A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO
TITLE 9 TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR HOME OCCUPATIONS;
CEQA DETERMINATION: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT AND THE CITY’S LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B) (3)
RECO

MMENDATION
That the City Council, by motion, initiate proceedings to consider a Municipal Code Amendment to Title 9 modifying regulations for home occupations.

BACKGROUND
As defined in Section 9.10.630, home occupations mean those uses that are customarily conducted in a residence, provided such uses must be incidental and secondary to the principal use of a dwelling as a residence. A home occupation operation would typically involve using office equipment, phone, and mail . In order to maintain the residential character of the home, no customers or clientele may visit the home; no employees other than the resident is permitted; and only vehicles typically used for personal use may be parked and/or stored on- site. No commercial vehicles may be part of the home occupation.

Some examples are as follows:
• Online jewelry business – Resident creates jewelry and sells it online. Minimum storage of jewelry and parts in the primary dwelling (not in any accessory structures). Use a personal car to deliver orders to the post office or other mail service.
• Office Use for an Accountant – Accountant would only use the office equipment, phone, and mail. Communications with customers/clientele would be via online, phone, or off-site. No customers would visit the home.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

There are a variety of zones in the City that allow residential dwelling uses. Most of the zones allow a home occupation as an incidental use while other zones do not. For example, a single-family home is permitted in the R -4 (Planned Residential) zone, but a home occupation is not permitted. As a result, the regulations to allow and approve home occupation uses are inconsistent. In addition, due to the increased number of Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) applications, consideration should be made if the City should permit or prohibit a home occupation in an ADU or Junior ADU. It is currently prohibited in any accessory structure.

ANALYSIS
The purpose of the Municipal Code amendments related to home occupations is to create consistent regulations for and permit home occupation uses in zones that allow for single- family units and multi-family units. Examples of potential amendments to the Code may include:
• Allow home occupation uses in zones where the single-family and multi -family dwelling units are allowed.
• Refinement of the City review process.
• New development standards to minimize potential adverse impacts ( examples:
noise, light/glare, traffic, dust, hazardous materials). • Provisions t o clarify the allowance of home occupations in Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior ADUs.

Initiation process
A Municipal Code Amendment that changes requirements requires initiation by the City Council. The following considerations apply to the initiation process, which only authorizes the process to begin:

1. Initiation of a Municipal Code Amendment does not entail an evaluation of the merits of the proposed project, but only whether to proceed with a formal evaluation process and public hearings.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
There is no requirement for public notice for an initiation of a Zoning Code Amendment.

Public notices for the public hearings of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment will be conducted on future dates.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
PUBL

IC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
(ZONE II ) TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED
(THE “DISTRICT”) AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; NORTHEAST CORNER

OF PYRITE STREET AND MISSION BOULEVARD

RECOMMENDATION
1) That
the City Council open the public hearing and receive any public comments;
2) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-25, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ZONE II); LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PYRITE STREET

AND MISSION BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, TO CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89- 1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,

ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 202 3-24 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE

CALIFORNIA STREETS A ND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY

ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
BA

CKGROUND
The Lands
caping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

(“Proposition 218”), requires the City Council conduct proceedings to annex territory into an assessment district formed under the Act and to levy assessments within such territory.

In connection with the City’s incorporation in 2011, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No. 12- 10 on July 22, 2010, to establish the Terms and Conditions of Incorporation, which require that the authority and responsibility for special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District be transfe rred to the City upon its incorporation.

By its Resolution No. 2011- 26, adopted on July 1, 2011, the City Council assumed all authority and responsibility for the special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District and specifically assumed responsibility for any and all special assessments levied in connection with such districts.

The County’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (the “County District”), established pursuant to the provisions of the Act includes various territories located both within the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “City Territory”) and outside the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “County Territory”). Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2016-01 adopted on February 4, 2016, the City declared that the City Territory is a district under the 1972 Act, which is separate and distinct from the County Territory, and designated such territory as the “Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated.”

At its March 2, 2023 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-20 initiating proceedings for the annexation of territory to the Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (the “District”) as Zone II and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory. The territory proposed to be annexed includes three (3) parcels identified as APNs 171- 020-001, 171-020-002, and 171-020- 025, generally located at the northeast corner of the Pyrite Street and Mission Boulevard intersection.

Further, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-22 declaring its intention to annex territory to the District and to levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. Resolution No. 2023-22 set April 20, 2023 as the public hearing date for protests to the levy of annual assessments and the annexation.

Subsequent to the March 2, 2023, meeting and in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, notice was mailed to the owners of the properties within the territory to be annexed, along with an assessment ballot for such owners to indicate support for, or opposition to, the proposed annexation. The notice indicated the amount of the proposed assessment for their respective parcels and the date, time and place of the public hearing.

Page | 3

ANALYSIS

It is proposed to include the additional parcels within the boundaries of the District and to levy assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection.

At the public hearing, the City Council must hear and consider all oral and written statements, protests, objections or other communications made or filed with respect to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments within such territory.

The assessment ballots must be tabulated at the public hearing. A majority protest exists if ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment and annexation exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment and annexation. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. In the absence of a
majority protest, the City Council may adopt a resolution ordering the annexation and levy and collection of assessments within the territory.

OTHER INFORMATION

• City Council initiated proceedings for the annexation on March 2, 2023.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment.

The City will file the special assessment with the County Auditor-Controller for collection via the annual property tax bills . The property owners have posted a deposit with their application to form Zone II, in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the annexation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability for the Zone II . The City’s cost to administer Zone II annually will be reimbursed through the special assessment charged to property owners.

The fiscal year 2023-2024 (base year) maximum assessment for landscape maintenance and street lighting for the Zone is $67,403 and it will be apportioned based on the number of assessable acres of each benefiting parcel within the zone boundary. The speci al assessment is subject to escalation beginning in FY 2024-2025 to account for reasonable increase cost for maintenance and inflation.

The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the services provided in Zone II as identified on the Engineer’s Report. Both the revenue and expenses wi ll be part of the City’s FY 2023-2024 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023- 25, ordering annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024.

Page | 4

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY (ZONE II); LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF

PYRITE STREET AND MISSION BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, TO

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING

A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS

AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 -24 PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISI ON 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE

XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley initiated proceedings for the annexation of territory to City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (hereinafter referred to as the "District") and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory for the 2023-2024 fiscal year and caused to be prepared a written report (the "Engineer's Report") in accordance with the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 2. Following notice duly given in accordance with law, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the Engineer's Report, the annexation of territory to the District, and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The City Council considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons and tabulated all ballots. The City Council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment against lots or parcels of property within the annexed territory for fiscal year 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the City Council.

Section 3. The City Council hereby orders the annexation of territory, which is described as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 171-020-001, 171-020-002, and 171-020-025 to the District. The District will continue to be designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated.

Section 4. Based upon its review of the Engineer's Report and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the annexed territory will be -2-
benefited by the improvements as described in such Engineer 's Report, (ii) the annexed territory includes all of the lands so benefited , (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the annexed territory for the 2023-2024 fiscal year, in accordance with the Engineer's Report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements; and (iv) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

Section 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as follows: : The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right -of-way parkway landscaped area on Mission Boulevard, as identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone II; the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris; the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; and, the operati on and maintenance cost of streetlights located within the public right -of-way on Pyrite Street and Mission Boulevard, as identified on the approved Streetlight Plans for the Shops at Jurupa Project and related to this Zone II; the operation and maintenance cost of traffic signals at the intersections of Mission Boulevard and shops entrance, Pyrite Street and shops entrance, and Mission Boulevard and Pyrite street; the operation and maintenance cost of traffic signals at the intersections of Pyrite Street and SR-60 eastbound ramps and Pyrite Street and SR -60 westbound ramps; the operation and maintenance cost and/or servicing of any of the foregoing.

Section 6. Lots or parcels of land within the annexed territory that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements.

Section 7. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment, with respect to the annexed parcels, as originally proposed in the Engineer's Report and as revised by the diagram, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

Section 8. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Section 9. The assessment is levied without regard to property valuation.

Section 10. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 5 above for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2023 and ending on June 30, 2024.

Section 11. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for the fiscal -3-
year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.

Section 12. The improvements shall be performed pursuant to law.

Section 13. The County Auditor of Riverside County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of the assessment and such assessments shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Administrative Services Director.

Section 14. The Administrative Director shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund known as "City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C Zone II" and such moneys shall be expended only for the improvements described in Section 5 above.

Section 15. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption.

Section 16. A certified copy of the diagram and assessment shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 20th day of April 2023.

Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-25 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 20 th day of April 202 3, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 20th day of April 202 3.

____________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
0 | P a g e

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 MARCH 2023

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE II
SHOPS AT JURUPA (TPM 37890)
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE ..................................................................................................... 6 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE II .............. 7 LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 7 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 8 PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 9 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 9 COST ESTIMATE ....................................................................................................................................... 10 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.............................................................................................................. 13 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 13

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF SHOPS AT JURUPA TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) AS ZONE II
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

Pursuant to the direction from the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (“City Council”), California, this Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is prepared and hereby submitted for the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) in compliance with the provisions of Section 22565 through 22574 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), said Act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

This Report provides for the annexation of a portion of Shops at Jurupa to City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89-1-C as Zone II and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 (2023-2024) and continuing in all subsequent Fiscal Years, for this area to be known and designated as:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE II

SHOPS AT JURUPA
I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefor and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the 1972 Act, do hereby submit the following:

Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and re lation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as show n on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessor Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
3 | P a g e

As of the date of this Report, there is one parcel or lots within Zone II that is owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency ; parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 171 -020-002 is existing Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District property/right-of-way. It is anticipated that such parcel will be under private ownership at the time of Parcel Map (TPM 37890) recordation and prior to the start of special tax assessment. No other parcels within Zone II are owned by a federal, state or o ther local governmental agency and would benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

March 2, 2023.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For pa rticulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein. On this 2nd day of March, 2023 the City Council, City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, ordering the preparation of the Report pr oviding for th e annexation of a portion of Shops at Jurupa (Tentative Parcel Map Number 37890) to L&LMD No. 89-1-C as Zone II did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, ad opt Resolution No. 2023-21 for a special assessment district zone known and designated as:

ZONE II
SHOPS AT JURUPA (TPM 37890)
The annexation of Zone II includes the parcels of land within the commercial center known as Shops at Jurupa, located within Tentative Parcel Map number 37890 (TPM 37890). As of the date of this report, the zone contains three (3) assessable parcels; also identified by the Assessor Parcel Number(s) 009171-020-001, 171 -020-002, 171 -020-025. As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of whi ch subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The following report presents the e ngineering analysis for the annexation of Zone II and the establishment of the Maximum Assessment to be levied and collected commencing Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and all subsequent fiscal years.

DEFINITIONS
Agency – Means the local government, City of Jurupa Valley.

Capital cost – Means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by the Agency.

District – Means an area determined by the Agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement of property-related service.

Maintenance and operation expenses - Means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.

5 | P a g e

Ad Valorem Reduction – Reduction based on a corresponding general benefit value of the improvements.

Special benefit – Means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

6 | P a g e

PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT

LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE

Zone II shall consist of a benefit zone encompassing the properties within the commercial development known as Shops at Jurupa . The proposed improvements described in this Report are based on current development and improvement plans provided as of the date of this Report.

Zone II is generally located on the northeast corner of Pyrite Street and Mission Boulevard intersection, in the City of Jurupa Valley, in the County of Riverside, State of California. At the time of this assessment, the assessment zone consists of 3 assessable (legal) parcels and zero non -assessable parcels. Zone II consists of all lots/units, parcels, and subdivisions of land located in the following development area:

Shops at Jurupa – Assessor Parcel Numbers as of date of this Report: 171-020-001, 171-020-002, 171- 020-025.

7 | P a g e

PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE II

The services to be funded by City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89 -1-C Zone II include the landscape maintenance within commercial development designated as Shops at Jurupa . The p roposed improvements, the a ssociated costs, and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on:
a. Level of Service
b. Improvement Types
c. Proximity to Improvement
d. Levels of Special Benefit from Zone (on Public versus Private) The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lot(s) or parcel(s) of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than by assessed value.

It was determined that the improvements identified by this report will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within Zone II. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the existing district as well as provide for annual maintenance of those improvements and the assessment revenues generated by the Zone will be used solely for such purpose.

LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for l andscaping servicing and maintenance on public right -of-way along Mission Boulevard and Pyrite Street. The following apply:

1. Servicing: the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements.

2. Maintenance: the furnishing of se rvices and materials for the ord inary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or repl acement of all of part of landscape improvements. Maintenance shall also include tree trimming for the trees identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for Zone II.

The benefits associated with landscaping improvements include:

1. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire protection.

2. Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties through well-maintained surrounding and amenities.
8 | P a g e

3. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuation noise.

STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for the operating energy cost and maintenance of the street lights servicing the commercial development, Shops at Jurupa, as shown in the Street Improvement Plans prepared for the development and approved by the City Engineer.

The benefits associated with streetlight improvements include:

1. Enhanced deterrence of crime such as vandalism and other criminal activities which would reduce damage to improvements or property.

2. Improved visibility to assist police in the protection of property.

3. Improved visibility for egress from and ingress to the property.

There are eleven streetlights considered for this assessment. The seven (7) streetlights along the north side of Mission Boulevard and four (4) along the east side of Pyrite Street.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for the operating energy cost and maintenance of the traffic signals servicing and required due to the new commercial development, Shops at Jurupa , as shown in the Street Improvement Plans prepared for the development and approved by the City Engineer.

The benefits associated with traffic signal improvements include:

1. Enhanced circulation at roadway intersections.

2. Enhanced traffic handling capacity of an intersection.

3. Improved safety and efficiency of pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

4. Improved visibility for egress from and ingress to the property.

There are five intersections included on this assessment: Mission Boulevard & Shops entrance, Pyrite Street & Shops entrance , Pyrite Street & SR -60 EB ramps, Pyrite Street & SR -60 WB ramps, and Mission Boulevard & Pyrite Street.
9 | P a g e

PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the Zone II to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

The landscaping , streetlight, and traffic signal improvements included on this assessment for Zone II provide direct and special benefit to the lots or parcels within the Zone. Therefore, the maintenance of these improvements also provides direct and special benefit by mai ntaining the functionality of the improvements and allowing the improvements to operate in a proper manner.

No property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property. Because all benefiting prop erties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all (any) commercial parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, streetlights, and traffic signals are apportioned on a per acre basis.

The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the Zone and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. A portion of the total maintenance costs for the landscaping and streetlights, if any, associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the Zone, but will be paid from other City of Jurupa Valley funds.

MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The following methodology was adopt ed by City Council in Resolution No. 2016 -01 dated February 4, 2016. Such methodology has been maintained in preparation of this Report. The purpose of establishing a Maximum Assessment formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjust ments to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which would add to the Zone II costs and assessments.

The Maximum Assessment formula shall be applied to all assessable parcels of land within the Zone. For Zone II, the initial Maximum Assessment(s) for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 are as follows:

1. The initial Total Maximum Assessment established within Zone II shall be $67,403.

2. The initial Maximum Assessment per assessable (existing) acre shall be $2,129.

3. The initial Maximum Assessment per assessable acre provided Parcel Map No. 37890 records prior to the base year assessment shall be $2,129.

The initial Maximum Assessment is subject to an annual inflator starting in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The initial Maxim um Assessment shall be adjusted by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI -U Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.
10 | P a g e

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of Zone II’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. The proposed annual assessment (rate per assessable parcel) applied in any fiscal year is not considered to be an increased assessment if less than or equal to the Maxim um Assessment amount. In no case shall the annual assessment exceed the Maximum Assessment.

Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual Zone II assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish reasonable limits on Zone II assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase of the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessments for the fiscal year require an increase and the increase is more than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, it is considered an increased assessment.

To impose an increase assessment, the City of Jurupa Valley must comply with th e provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owner through the balloting pr ocess must approve the proposed assessment increase. If the proposed assessment is approved, then a new Maximum Assessment is established for Zone II. If the proposed assessment is not approve d, the City may not levy an assessment greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment previously established for Zone II.

COST ESTIMATE
The Ad Valorem reduction is the corresponding general benefit value of the improvements, and it is determined by identifying the general public benefit from the installation and upkeep o f the improvements identified on this report. All proposed landscape contained within this report are located directly in front of the assessed zone and the construction and installation of the improvements were only necessary for the development of proper ties within the Zone. Therefore, it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the one or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for these improvements is zero.

The proposed streetlights along the site (zone boundary) frontage on Mission Boulevard are requirements of the private development Shops at Jurupa and TPM 37890. Mission Boulevard is expected to be a divided corridor, and the streetlights are not consider a direct benefit to the parcels along the south side of Mission Boulevard. The street lights are considered a direct benefit of the future Shops at Jurupa development and therefore the Ad Valorem reduction for these improvements is zero.

The proposed streetlights along the site ( zone boundary) frontage on Pyrite Street are requirements of the private development Shops at Jurupa and TPM 37890. The properties fronting Pyrite Street between Mission Boulevard and CalTrans right -of-way are the direct beneficiaries of streetlight improvements along this street segment. Streetlights covered by proposed Zone II are along the easterly side of Pyrite Street and therefore correspond to 50% of the required responsibility for lighting. The Ad Valorem reduction based on the total required improvements for lighting and based on street frontage is estimated to 50%. Since the improvements only cover 50% of the total lighting of the segment, the share 11 | P a g e

corresponding to Zone II is 50% of the total lighting of both sides of the street or 100% of half the street.

Therefore, no Ad Valorem reduction is noted for this item.

The traffic signal at Mission Boulevard & shops entrance will be a new traffic signal located at the development’s main access point on Mission Boulevard. The traffic analysis prepared for this project and traffic signal location was considered and it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zone II boundary or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for these improvements is zero.

The traffic signal at Pyrite Street & Shops entrance will be a new traffic signal located at the development’s overall main access on Pyrite Street . The traffic analysis prepared for this project and traffic signal location was considered and it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zone II boundary or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for these improvements is zero.

The traffic signals at Pyrite Street & SR -60 EB ramps are not existing traffic signals. Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project , signal location, and cumulative (future) projects , the City provided a reduction value. The district will be assessed for 45% of the estimated maintenance and operation cost.

The traffic signals at Pyrite Street & SR-60 WB ramps are not existing traffic signals., . Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, signal location, an d cumulative (future) projects, the City provided a reduction value. The district will be assessed for 45% of the estimated maintenance and operation cost.

The traffic signal at Mission Boulevard & Pyrite Street is an existing traffic signal. Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project and the traffic signal location, and ad valorem reduction has been provided. The district will be assessed for 20% of the estimated maintenance and operation cost.

The Assessment for each assessable parcel within Zone II is calculated by dividing the total Annual Balance to Levy minus the Ad Valorem Reduction by the total number of assessable subdivided parcels within Zone II to determine the Annual Assessment per assessable parcel.

𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑦 − 𝐴𝑑 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑅𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠 = 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠 The Annual Balance to Levy is the Total Annual Landscaping Costs plus the Total Annual Streetlight Costs as seen in the following summary table:

12 | P a g e

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE II

SHOPS AT JURUPA
FY 2023-2024
Total Assessable Acres: 31.67 acres Total Assessable Parcels (TPM No. 37890): 17 Cost Description Total Cost for
Zone II
Cost per Acre
for Zone II
Landscaping:

Annual Landscaping Maintenance: $7,351.79 $232.14
Tree Trimming : $3,520.00 $111.15
Water (including water meter) $7,202.00 $227.41
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 $6.95
Electricity (including electric meter) $500.00 $15.79
Mulch : $739.20 $23.34
Calsense Single: $250.00 $7.89
Backflow Certificate : $50.00 $1.58
Repairs & Replacements (15%): $2,974.95 $93.94
TOTAL ANNUAL LANDSCAPING COSTS : $22,807.94 $720.17

Streetlighting:

Streetlights LED (Mission Boulevard): $1,308.94 $41.33
Streetlights LED (Pyrite Street):

Street lights repairs and maintenance (7%):
$681.92
$139.36
$21.53
$4.40
TOTAL ANNUAL STREETLIGHTING COSTS : $1,990.86 $62.86

Traffic Signals:

Traffic Signal at Mission Boulevard & shops entrance $10,000.00 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite Street & Shops entrance $10,000.00 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite Street & SR-60 EB ramps $4,500.00 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Pyrite Street & SR-60 WB ramps $4,500.00 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Mission Boulevard & Pyrite Street $1,000.00 $31.58 Signal repairs and maintenance (10%) $3,000.00 $94.73
TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL COSTS : $30,000.00 $947.27

ADMINISTRATION (8%) $4,383.90 $138.42
INSPECTION (5%) $2,739.94 $86.52
CONTINGENCY (10%) $5,479.88 $173.03

TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT: *$67,403 *$2,129
*Rounded up to nearest dollar
INITIAL MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER ASSESSABLE ACRE : $2,129

13 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
(See next page)

14 | P a g e

15 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

Parcel identification for each parcel within Zone II shall be the parcels as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps .

Zone II includes the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) as of the date of this Report: 171-020- 001, 171-020-002, 171-020-025.

The foregoing APNs are included within the boundary of Parcel Map No. 37890. The assessment to be levied upon each par cel that benefits from the annexation of Zone II to L&LMD No. 89 -1-C will be $2,129per acre for fiscal year 2023-24. As stated in this Report, the total budget for Zone II for the fiscal year 202 3-24 is $ 67,403. Parcel Map No. 37890 is anticipated to record prior to the base year of assessment (FY2 3-24). When subdivided, the initial Maximum Assessments per assessable lot/parcel based on the acreage for Zone II are as follows:

TPM
No.
37890
PARCEL

APPROXIMATE

ASSESSABLE

ACREAGE
FY23-24

ASSESSMENT
1 1.96 $4,171.84
2 1.59 $3,385.11
3 1.27 $2,703.83
4 1.06 $2,256.74
5 1.40 $2,980.60
6 1.87 $3,981.23
7 0.91 $1,937.39
8 1.33 $2,831.57
9 0.8 $1,703.20
10 0.98 $2,086.42
11 1.27 $2,703.83
12 1.06 2,256.74
13 1.89 $4,023.81
14 0.87 $1,852.23
15 1.13 $2,405.77
16 8.29 $17,643.41
17 3.99 $8,494.71

The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted annually by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U for All Items Index published by the BLS.

Page | 1
120
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.B
PUBL
IC HEARING FOR THE 2023-2028 C OMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN, 2023/24

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
RECO

MMENDATION

1. That the City Council receive and file the 2023-28 Consolidated Plan, the 2022- 2023 Annual Action Plan and the Citizen Participation Plan.

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-26, entitled:

A RE

SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN (2023 -2028), ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (202 3-2024) AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR THE CITY’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

PROGRAM
BAC

KGROUND
C
ommunity Development Block Grants (CDBG) started in the United States in 1974, during the Ford administration. As the name suggests, these grants are blocks of Federal funding whose expenditure priorities are determined locally, although the CDBG projects must meet specific national criteria.

O
n July 20, 2017, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) informed the City that it qualified as a potential new, direct grantee entitlement city for CDBG funds. Subsequently, the City of Jurupa Valley successfully began the process to become HUD direct grantee entitlement city. Prior to 2018, the County of Riverside managed the City’s CDBG program.

A
s a Community Development Block Grant recipient, the City is required to submit a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan), Annual Action Plan and a Citizen Participation Plan every five years. Five years ago, the City of Jurupa Valley submitted its first Con Plan to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the 2018-22 period.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

The Con Plan for the 2023-2028 five-year strategic planning period is due to HUD in May 2023, along with the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan.

ANALYSIS

During the previous five fiscal years, the City has received approximately $1.2 million per year in CDBG funds. Prior to Jurupa Valley becoming an entitlement city, Jurupa received significantly less CDBG funds ($354,778 in 2017- 18 fiscal year). On February 27, 2023, HUD allocated the City of Jurupa Valley $1,019,728 in CDBG Funds.

CDBG Annual Allocations

Year CDBG Funds CDBG-CV Funds
2017-18 $354,778 * -
2018-19 $1,189,419 -
2019-20 $1,203,797 -
Year CDBG Funds CDBG-CV Funds
2020-21 $1,194,732 $1,367,137
2021-22 $1,174,850
2022-23 $1,112,960
2023-24 $1,091,728
* Under the
Riverside
County
CDBG
program

Consolidated Plan & Annual Action Plan

The Con Plan is a long -range plan required by HUD that documents local housing and community development needs, and how the City intends to meet identified local housing and community development needs over the next five-year period. Main components of the ConPlan include the following: a housing and community economic development needs assessment; a housing market analysis; housing and supportive services for homelessness; strategies that reflects general goals (priorities) and performance outcome measurements for allocating HUD funds; a list of long-term strategies and goals to address priority needs with specific objectives (including proposed accomplishments); an Annual Action Plan (one year funding) describing how federal and local resources will be used to address the needs and objectives identified in the ConPlan, and a Citizen Participation Plan.

During the past year , City staff conducted various public outreach meetings, and completed an online survey to receive input on the Con Plan from the community. Based on community outreach work, and also on previous year’s CDBG projects’ activities a

Page | 3

draft allocation of CDBG funds for the 2023- 24 fiscal year is provided below for consideration.

CDBG Annual Allocation (2023-24)

Activities % Amount
Administration 6% $63,969
Public Service Grants (maximum
is 15% of annual allocation) 15% $163,759
Other Projects 79% $864,000
Total Allocation - 2023-2024 100% $1,091,728

The Con Plan for 2023-28 includes the following main goals for the next five years:

Goal Public Infrastructure Improvements
Goal Description
Improvements to roadways, streets,
sidewalks, and other eligible public
infrastructure that primarily benefit low-
and moderate-income persons.

Goal Single Family Housing Rehabilitation
Goal Description
Loans or grants to assist qualified low-
and moderate-income homeowners to
improve primary residence.

Goal Homeless Services
Goal Description
Homeless housing and support services,
including homelessness prevention
services.

Goal Public Services
Goal Description Support services for low- and moderate- income persons.

Goal Fair Housing Services
Goal Description Services to address impediments to
access fair housing.

Goal Program Administration
Goal Description CDBG program oversight and
coordination.
1 2
3 4
5 6

Page | 4

Citizen Participation Plan

The Citizen Participation Plan explains how the City will work with community members, and organizations in the public, private, and non-profit sectors to help carry out ConPlan strategies. The Plan was prepared to comply with HUD’s requirement that local governments must provide citizens with reasonable advance notice of, and opportunity to, comment on proposed activities. The main components of the Citizen Participation Plan include: public hearing requirements and dates of plan adoption; policies for providing technical assistance; policies for providing citizens an opportunity to comment on performance reports for project activities; and procedures for comments, objections and complaints.

Current Outreach Efforts

Notices for all public meetings, including the required public hearing, were published in The Press-Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, as required by HUD. In preparing the ConPlan, the City is required to gather input from residents and community stakeholders (particularly from the low-income areas) on community needs.

The City has hosted two community meetings on July 14, 2022 and December 6, 2022.

Also, the City’s Community Development Advisory Committee held public meetings to review, assess and recommend public service grants on February 9, 2023 and February 23, 2023. Jurupa Valley also gathered community input online on the Consolidated Plan, Annual Plan and Citizen Participation Plan. This public hearing is also part of the City’s outreach efforts.

It should be stressed that the City conducted a citywide opinion survey online. Paper copies of the surveys were also made available at City Hall, as needed which allowed residents to express their thoughts on topics such as: Community Facilities & Services Public Infrastructure, Economic Development and Housing. The survey was publicized and accessible via social media (e.g., Facebook) and the City’s website.

The draft ConPlan, Annual Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan were posted on the City’s website for public review and comment, and hard copies were made available at City Hall and two local libraries during the required 30-day public comment period.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City will receive an allocation of $1,019,728 for the 2023- 24 CDBG program year.

All of the proposed activities described in the 2023 -24 Annual Action Plan are reimbursable through the City’s CDBG allocation. For years 2- 5 of the five- year Consolidated Plan period, it is estimated that Jurupa Valley will receive approximately $1.1 million per year. For each subsequent year, from year s 2-5, allocation of CDBG funds during this period, will go through the same process as this initial year.

Page | 5

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not receive and file the 2023-28 Consolidated Plan, the 2023-24 Annual Action Plan and the Citizen Participation Plan.

2. Do not adopt Resolution No. 2023-__.

3. Provide alternate direction to Staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

CONSOLIDATED PLAN (2023-2028), ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (2023-2024), AND THE CITIZEN’S

PARTICIPATION PLAN
Draft: April 6, 2023
Please note that this draft is subject to modifications during the public review period. Please note draft date may change.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction
The City of Jurupa Valley (City) under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), has developed a five-year strategic plan, also known as the 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan (“ConPlan”), that identifies and prioritizes the future use of the City’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

In preparing its ConPlan, the City used several methods to analyze its housing and community development needs, surveying community residents, stakeholders and; analyzing U.S. Census, American Community Survey (ACS) and other demographic data; and using information from City and Riverside County planning documents. The City hosted a community workshop and contacted organizations in an effort to reach out to and encourage participation by all residents, particularly low- and moderate- income residents, the elderly and persons with disabilities. The purpose for contacting residents was to inform the community about the ConPlan process, which identifies opportunities to improve collaborative efforts, eliminates service delivery gaps and develops and sustains decent and affordable housing, suitable living environments and expanded community and economic opportunities.

To receive its entitlement funding from HUD, the City is required to approve an Action Plan for each fiscal year. The Action Plan must describe how the City intends to invest its CDBG funds to meet the ConPlan’s priorities to address housing and community development needs. The City estimates that for FY 2023/24’s Action Plan – City will be allocated approximately $1.1 million of entitlement CDBG funds.

Future funding is based on two assumptions: 1) the City will continue to receive CDBG funding over the next five years, and 2) the City’s entitlement funding distribution formulas, or the number of communities eligible to receive entitlement grants, will remain constant. If any of the conditions change, projected activities and accomplishments are subject to change.

The City’s goals for projects over the next five years are designed to meet the community’s needs and the national objectives for HUD funding.

This ConPlan is divided into five major parts: 1) Process, which summarizes the City’s efforts to engage Jurupa Valley residents/stakeholders and determine the community’s priorities; 2) the Needs Assessment, which identifies the City’s priority needs related to affordable housing and community development; 3) the Market Analysis, which sets forth the environment in which the City will implement its programs; 4) the Strategic Plan, which establishes goals, policies and actions for addressing the needs of the community; and 5) the City’s Action Plan for FY 2023/24.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview
The Needs Assessment summarizes the City’s needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development, and homelessness. The Needs Assessment includes the following sections:
• Housing Needs Assessment
• Disproportionately Greater Need
• Public Housing
• Homeless Needs Assessment
• Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment
• Non-Housing Community Development Needs
The Needs Assessment identified those needs with the highest priority, which form the basis for the Strategic Plan section and the programs and projects to be administered. The City’s overall objective for the CDBG program, as specified in the Strategic Plan section, mirrors HUD’s overall objective for the program: to create a viable community by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. To accomplish this objective in Jurupa Valley, the following Consolidated Plan goals have been identified based on the input of residents and other community stakeholders:
• Conserve the existing supply of affordable housing by supporting the provision of federal rental assistance vouchers and certificates administered by the Housing Authority of Riverside County.
• Assist with the preservation of the City’s owner-occupied single-family housing stock. • Support housing and services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. • Support community social services benefitting low- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs.
• Provide needed public infrastructure and facility improvements benefitting low- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs.
• Ensure quality, professional administration of federal funds, including the provision of fair housing services to address discriminatory actions that impede access to housing.

All planned programs and projects are subject to availability of funds and the approval of the City Council.

3. Evaluation of past performance
The City’s evaluation of its past performance has been completed in a thorough Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). These documents state the objectives and outcomes identified in each year’s Annual Action Plan and include an evaluation of past performance through measurable goals and objectives compared to actual performance. CDBG reports up to five-years of past performance are available for public review on the City’s website at: https://jurupavalley.org/.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City of Jurupa Valley took several steps to obtain the input of community residents and stakeholders to develop the 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan and the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan. Consultation efforts included dissemination of a community needs survey - in English and Spanish - and a community workshop. The City also consulted with state and regional agencies and local service providers.

Additionally, the City utilized its internet webpage, social media, and the local community newspaper to notify residents of the opportunity to review and comment on the draft 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan and the 2023/2024 Annual Action Plan. Actions taken by the City are consistent with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan.

5. Summary of public comments
Comments received through the community outreach effort included:

ConPlan Survey (June to July 31, 2022). The City of Jurupa Valley had an extensive effort to procure input. Online and print versions of the surveys were made available in English and Spanish. (Please see Appendix A for complete survey results). According to the results of the ConPlan Survey and community meetings, the top community needs from residents and service providers were:
• Community Facility: Youth centers, healthcare facilities, parks and recreation. • Public Infrastructure: Street improvements, lighting and sidewalk/ADA curb ramps. • Social Services: Crime awareness, mental health and graffiti removal. • Economic Development: Job creation, contaminated site clean-up and façade improvements. • Housing Improvements: Housing rehab-efficiency, operation / repair of foreclosed properties and housing for seniors.
• Housing Services: Neighborhood cleanups, affordable housing and residential property maintenance.
• Homeless Services: Mental health, substance abuse centers, and homeless prevention services.

Community Workshop (July 14, 2022). The key issues raised at the workshop was the need for more housing units in Jurupa Valley – targeted at the City’s housing-cost burdened population, need for emergency shelters, permanent supportive housing and stable housing communities. Also, need for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), housing along transportation hubs - and related transportation issues and faith-based housing development accommodation.

Draft ConPlan’s 30-Day Public Review. The 30-day public review period took place from March 21, 2023 through April 20, 2023. There were ___ comments.

Public Hearing. A public hearing was conducted before the City Council on April 20, 2023 to obtain additional public comment input on the prioritization of goals during the development of the ConPlan.

An English and Spanish public notice was published in the newspaper on March 21, 2023 notifying the public of the April 20, 2023 public hearing. There were __ comments.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them There were no comments or views that were not accepted.

7. Summary
Full citizen participation summary results are included in Appendix A. Summaries and surveys are included, though, there were __ comments received during the 30-day public review period and ___ at the public hearings.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
The Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)

1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency

CDBG Administrator JURUPA VALLEY City Administration
Table 1 – Responsible Agencies

Narrative
The City Manager’s office is primarily responsible for the preparation of the Consolidated Plan and for administration of CDBG funds.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Ms. Amy Sells
Principal Management Analyst
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Phone: (951) 332-6464 X249 / Fax: (951) 332-6995
[email protected]

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and

91.315(I)

1. Introduction
The City of Jurupa Valley took several steps to obtain the input of community residents and stakeholders to develop the Consolidated Plan and the 2023-2028 Annual Action Plan. Consultation efforts included dissemination of a community needs survey and a community workshop. The City also consulted with state and regional agencies and local service providers. Additionally, the City utilized its internet webpage, social media, and the local community newspaper to notify residents of the opportunity to review and comment on the draft 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.

Actions taken by the City are consistent with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan which is incorporated into the Consolidated Plan as Attachment 1.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).

The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certified Jurupa Valley’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element on April 22, 2022. The Housing Element emphasizes coordination with the Riverside County Housing Authority to pursue grant funding and other incentives to promote and assist the nonprofit and/or private production of housing affordable to lower income households. Among assisted housing providers, Jurupa Valley partners with the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR), which assists renter households with HUD-funded housing assistance vouchers and certificates.

The City of Jurupa Valley has a total of 340 vouchers being utilized within City limits.

With respect to service agencies, the City has various agreements in place with non-profits to provide homeless and other services. City intends to continue to work with service providers and is also exploring working with other nearby cities to provide more comprehensive services to meet community needs.

Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness As a “Participating City” in the Urban County CDBG program, Jurupa Valley contributed to the Riverside County Continuum of Care (RC-CoC) planning process through the County of Riverside. As a direct CDBG grantee, the City will continue to participate in the RC-CoC by contributing to the regional CoC planning process. Additionally, the City initiated the process to build relationships with local CoC service providers in order to address the needs of the City’s homeless.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS The City is not a recipient of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, it does not assist the RC- CoC with the determination of ESG allocations or evaluating outcomes, and developing policies and procedures for the administration of the regional Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).

2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated

1 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Fair Housing Council Agency/Group/Organization Type Service-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Impediments to Fair Housing Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Agency provided data and information that
helped identify the needs of households
requiring fair housing services. Also provided
input regarding the region's strategy to address
impediments to fair housing.
2 Agency/Group/Organization County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless
Regional organization
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
HMIS
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Regional Continuum of Care coordinator and
HMIS administrator. Provided significant
information regarding regional and City
homeless population and resources.
3 Agency/Group/Organization State of California
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government – State What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Demographics
Lead-based Paint Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Various State departments and agencies were
consulted to obtain information regarding
employment, demographics, and lead
poisoning.
4 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Agency/Group/Organization Type Public Housing Authority CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Provided information regarding number and
type of households receiving rental assistance
and the number of households requesting
housing assistance.
5 Agency/Group/Organization County of Riverside
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government – County What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Economic Development
Demographics
Lead-based Paint Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Various county departments and agencies were
consulted to obtain information regarding
employment and demographics.
6 Agency/Group/Organization City of Jurupa Valley
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government – Local What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
City departments and City Council provided
data and information, identified priorities, and
recommendations for the allocation of HUD
funds.
7 Agency/Group/Organization Council on Aging – Southern California Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Agency helped identify needs of senior and frail
elderly persons and households.
8 Agency/Group/Organization 211 Community Connect
Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional organization
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Provided data regarding various community
social service needs.

Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City had an open consultation process; no agency was prevented or excluded from participating.

Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the
goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care County of Riverside Department
of Public Social Services
Regional and local Point-In-Time
Survey (including Plan to End
Homelessness and discharge
planning)
City of Jurupa Valley General
Plan (Including Housing
Element)
City of Jurupa Valley Housing priorities and program
goals
City of Jurupa Valley Capital
Improvement Plan
City of Jurupa Valley Multi-year capital improvement
plan helped identify priority
capital projects that may be
CDBG-eligible
5 Yr & 1 Yr PHA Plan Housing Authority of the County
of Riverside (HACR)
Resources to address housing
needs of lower income renter
householders
Fair Housing Impediments
Study
City of Jurupa Valley Document identified fair
housing impediments within
Jurupa Valley and outlined plan
to address
Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))
State agencies were consulted to obtain updated housing and population information. The County of Riverside was contacted to obtain an array of data including information regarding children with elevated lead blood levels, the number of households receiving rental assistance, homeless count, and other regional plans. Local governments also assisted the City with the preparation of the Consolidated Plan. The City also consulted with several local nonprofit agencies regarding issues related to senior services and housing, fair housing, and homelessness.

Information and data obtained through the consultation process was utilized Narrative (optional):

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting

The City implemented the following efforts to obtain a broad range of resident input during the preparation of the 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2023-23 Annual Action Plan:

ConPlan Survey: An electronic (Survey Monkey) and hard copy survey instrument were utilized to obtain public input regarding priority housing and community needs. The survey was publicized and accessible via social media (e.g., Facebook) and the City’s website. Hard copies of the survey were also available at City Hall. A summary of survey results is incorporated into the Consolidated Plan as Attachment 2.

Community Workshop: A community workshop was held by the City on July 14, 2022. The purpose of the meeting was to provide information regarding the CDBG program and the Consolidated Plan and to obtain public input regarding priority needs.

Notices/Website: Notices for all public meetings, including the required public hearing, were published in a local newspaper of general circulation (The Press-Enterprise). Additionally, the draft Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan were posted on the City’s website for public review and comment, and hard copies were made available during the required 30-day public comment period.

Public Hearings: Consistent with HUD’s regulations, the City Council held a public hearing at a regularly noticed and scheduled meeting on April 20, 2023 to obtain public input regarding the draft Consolidated Plan and the proposed use of 2023-2024 CDBG funds, and to authorize staff to submit the document to HUD.

Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance
Summary of
comments received
Summary of comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL (If
applicable)
1 ConPlan Survey Non-targeted/
broad community
Survey to solicit input
regarding housing
and community
needs – June 2022
thru July 31, 2022
See summary –
Attachment 2
NA NA
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance
Summary of
comments received
Summary of comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL (If
applicable)
2 Public Meeting
Non-
targeted/broad
community
Residents, local
service providers, city
staff and community
development
consultants
Input regarding
needs of homeless
and city residents
None NA
3 Newspaper Ad
Non-
targeted/broad
community
30-day public
comment period and
public hearing notice
No comments None NA
4 Public Hearing
Non-
targeted/broad
community
4/40/23 public
hearing to approve
2023-2028 Con Plan
and 2023-24 Action
Plan and to authorize
submission of the
plans to HUD
No comments None NA
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview
The Needs Assessment provides a summary of the City’s needs related to affordable housing, special needs housing, community development, and homelessness. The Needs Assessment includes the following sections:
▪ Housing Needs Assessment
▪ Disproportionately Greater Need
▪ Public Housing
▪ Homeless Needs Assessment
▪ Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment
▪ Non-Housing Community Development Needs
The Needs Assessment identifies those needs with the highest priority, which forms the basis for the Strategic Plan section and the programs and projects to be administered. Most of the data tables in this section are populated with default Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data developed by the Census Bureau for HUD based on 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) data.

Other sources are noted throughout the Plan.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c)
Summary of Housing Needs
The City of Jurupa Valley, which was incorporated in 2011, currently has an estimated population of about 105,000 residents. (DOF E-5 2022). According to U.S. Census Bureau data presented in Table 5, Housing Needs Assessment Demographics below, the City’s estimated population grew by 26.8 percent between 2000 and 2017 to a population total of 102,205 residents in 2017. Household growth in the City has not grown as quickly as population, with only 12.3 percent growth from 2000 to 2017. As a result, Jurupa Valley’s average household size grew from 3.61 persons in 2000 to 4.06 persons in 2017.

Jurupa Valley’s 2017 median household income was $63,286. As shown in Table 6, Total Households below, approximately 12,620 households – 50.1 percent of all households in the city -- had incomes that exceeded the HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI) for Riverside County. Nonetheless, Jurupa Valley has a significant number of lower-income households. A total of 12,545 households -- about 49.9 percent of all households in the City -- had incomes less than or equal to 80 percent HAMFI.

Seniors have a significant presence in the City’s households; more than 8,000 households, or about 32.9 percent of all households, had at least one person age 62 or older. Incomes in these households were lower than in the City as a whole, with 54.5 percent having an income below 80 percent HAMFI. Lower income levels were more pronounced in households including at least one person age 75 or older, as

69.0 percent of these households had income below 80 percent HAMFI.

Demographics Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change Population1 80,596 102,205 26.8%
Households2 22,411 25,160 12.3%
Median Income NA $63,286.00
Table 5 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics

Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) (1) 2000 Census data aggregated at the census tract level - Jurupa Valley General Plan Update. (2) 2000 Census data aggregated at the block group level - Jurupa Valley General Plan Update.

Number of Households Table
0-30%
HAMFI
>30-50%
HAMFI
>50-80%
HAMFI
>80-100%
HAMFI
>100%
HAMFI
Total Households 2,500 2,950 4,435 2,660 12,620
Small Family Households 910 895 1,570 1,070 6,455
Large Family Households 485 705 1,400 930 3,300
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 645 810 890 555 3,040
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
0-30%
HAMFI
>30-50%
HAMFI
>50-80%
HAMFI
>80-100%
HAMFI
>100%
HAMFI
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older 265 550 620 175 725
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or younger 785 810 1,265 660 1,975 Table 6 - Total Households Table
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Housing Needs Summary Tables

1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing -
Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen
facilities 55 100 20 10 185 20 0 15 0 35
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51
people per
room (and
complete
kitchen and
plumbing) 265 125 125 20 535 55 95 135 30 315
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per
room (and
none of the
above
problems) 175 355 275 190 995 35 135 355 200 725
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 845 700 340 20 1,905 545 430 690 95 1,760
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 100 385 805 305 1,595 50 190 610 635 1,485
Zero/negative
Income (and
none of the
above
problems) 40 0 0 0 40 95 0 0 0 95
Table 7 – Housing Problems Table
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more
of four housing
problems 1,340 1,280 760 240 3,620 650 660 1,200 325 2,835 Having none of
four housing
problems 240 490 1,125 840 2,695 130 525 1,350 1,260 3,265 Household has
negative income,
but none of the
other housing
problems 40 0 0 0 40 95 0 0 0 95
Table 8 – Housing Problems 2
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 540 455 440 1,435 255 265 610 1,130
Large Related 385 415 355 1,155 65 185 505 755
Elderly 380 640 295 1,315 210 240 280 730
Other 130 95 250 475 115 80 100 295
Total need by
income
1,435 1,605 1,340 4,380 645 770 1,495 2,910
Table 9 – Cost Burden > 30%
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

4. Cost Burden > 50%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 540 265 85 890 225 180 350 755
Large Related 385 285 25 695 65 130 180 375
Elderly 310 350 165 825 190 165 210 565
Other 100 65 70 235 100 60 25 185
Total need by
income
1,335 965 345 2,645 580 535 765 1,880
Table 10 – Cost Burden > 50%
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
households 365 425 245 149 1,184 90 180 275 190 735
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Multiple,
unrelated family
households 100 80 110 60 350 0 35 215 40 290
Other, non-family
households 0 4 45 0 49 0 15 0 0 15
Total need by
income
465 509 400 209 1,583 90 230 490 230 1,040
Table 11 – Crowding Information – 1/2
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
Households
with Children
Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 12 – Crowding Information – 2/2

Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.

Per the 2014-2018 ACS estimate, there were a total of 27,454 households in Jurupa Valley, of which 15.1 percent (3,964) were single-person households (Table ACS B11016). Of the estimated 28,677 total housing units, 13.2 percent of units (3,779 units) were studios and one-bedroom, with the remaining almost 87 percent of housing units containing two or more bedrooms (Table ACS DP04). This disparity of 185 single person households in excess of the number of studio and one-bedroom units may indicate that a significant number of individuals are unable to access the limited supply of housing units typically occupied by individuals living alone -- either renting out larger units at a cost burden or living with unrelated roommates and reporting themselves as single-person households despite the presence of others in the same unit.

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

According to 2014-2018 ACS estimates (Table ACS B23024), there were a total of 873 individuals with a disability in Jurupa Valley with household income below the federal poverty level.

Based on the U.S. Center for Disease Control’s National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (Average 2016-2017), 54.3 percent of women and 30.7 percent of men have been victimized by rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner. In Jurupa Valley, where the 2021 population CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 21
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
of 106,937 is made up of 52,986 females and 53,951 males (Table ACS DP05), these proportions equate to approximately 28,771 women and 16,563 men. Particularly for women, being victims of domestic violence can make them vulnerable to homelessness and affordable or emergency housing options can mean the difference between staying in an abusive relationship and getting out.

What are the most common housing problems?
The most prevalent housing problem facing households in the city was housing cost burden (overpayment). The definition of affordable housing is where the cost of shelter does not exceed 30 percent of the household’s gross monthly income. According to Table 9, Cost Burden >30%, 5,210 households (20.7% of the city’s total households) spend over 30 percent of their income on housing and Table 10, Cost Burden >50%, shows 2,610 households (10.4% of the total households) spend over 50 percent of their income on housing.

A related but less common problem is overcrowding, as large households and extended or multiple families may occupy the same housing unit. According to Table 11, Crowding Information, households considered to be overcrowded (in excess of one person per room), account for 10.4% of total households in the city.

Housing that is in substandard condition is also considered a housing problem. Table 7, Housing Problems, shows that of the total households in the city, there were 220 households or 0.9% considered substandard. Substandard housing condition refers to the ability of various systems in a house to meet adopted building codes for health and safety, including lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities.

Households living in substandard conditions are considered to be in need of housing assistance, even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements, due to the threat to residents’ health and safety that substandard housing poses.

Table 8, Housing Problems 2, presents the number households with one or more severe housing problems: lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden. The table shows that 25.7% of the total households in the city have one or more of the four housing problems.

Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? Housing tenure and income both linked to housing problems. As shown in Table 8, Housing Problems 2, renters are 57.0% more likely than owners to live in housing conditions with one or more severe housing problems (lack of kitchen, complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, and severe overpayment. In addition, renter households with incomes less than 50 percent of the AMI account for 72.4% of the total renters for one or more housing problems. Referring again to Table 9, Cost Burden > 30%, 40.4% of renter households experience a cost burden of greater than 30 percent of income, compared to only

31.1% of owner households. According to Table 11, Crowding Information, 6.3 percent of all renter households and 4.1 percent of owner households experience overcrowding.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance Poverty is often associated with a high risk of becoming homeless. Households that depend on public assistance programs such as Social Security, SSI, CalFresh (food stamps), and CalWORKs (temporary assistance for needy families) are especially susceptible to homelessness. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 2021 (B23024)), approximately 6,494 Jurupa Valley residents live in acute poverty (i.e., household income less than 50% of the federal poverty level). The Census Bureau (C18130) also estimates that 7,907 disabled Jurupa Valley residents live in poverty. Additionally, the Census Bureau (S1702) reports that 11.7% of Jurupa Valley families with children lived in poverty.

Another variable to consider is the number of households requesting rental assistance. Based on consultation with HARC staff, as of January 2023, 2,495 Jurupa Valley households are on the waitlist for federal rental assistance. Of these households, 350 are senior households, 581 are disabled households, and 44 are veteran Jurupa Valley households.

Riverside County's continuum of care program assesses people that may qualify for a housing voucher and which assistance program fits best. One of their most successful programs is "rapid rehousing," which provides short-term rental assistance to quickly move people experiencing homelessness into a home. Rapid rehousing is typically a six-month placement in a private apartment, paid for with federal funds that are managed by the county. The goal in that half-year is to help people transition to long- term housing. To qualify, people must be homeless or near homelessness with income at or below 50% of the poverty line. In Riverside County the continuum of care has assisted 116 persons, as of June 2022.

If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:

Jurupa Valley does not have specific estimates of the at‐risk population beyond those available through the Census, American Community Survey, and information provided by HARC.

Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness
As outlined above, “at-risk” populations have been identified as households living in poverty, including seniors, individuals with disabilities, and families with children. The HARC has indicated that over 2,449 Jurupa Valley households are currently on the waitlist for rental assistance – over 41.2% of these households are senior or disabled households, and 7 have indicated they are homeless.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 23
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Discussion
The key findings of this section include:
▪ The most prevalent housing problem facing households in the City was overpayment on housing costs – 20.7% of the city’s total households spend over 30 percent of their income on housing and 10.4% of the total households spend over 50 percent of their income on housing. ▪ The largest portion of the total households facing a cost burden of over 30 percent were 1,770 small-related households.
▪ Housing that is in a substandard condition is also considered a housing problem -- approximately

25.7% of the total households in the city have one or more of the four housing problems. ▪ Approximately, 40.4% of renter households experience a cost burden of greater than 30 percent of income, compared to almost one-third (31.1%) of owner households.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

Introduction
A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the income level as a whole. For example, if 60 percent of all low-income households within a jurisdiction have a housing problem and 70 percent or more of low-income Hispanic households have a housing problem, then low-income Hispanic households have a disproportionately greater need.

As defined by HUD, the four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities;

2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities;

3. More than one person per room; and

4. Cost burden greater than 30 percent.

The following tables identify the number and extent of housing problems by income level and by race/ethnicity.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,135 225 135
White 530 105 60
Black / African American 165 35 0
Asian 40 4 15
American Indian, Alaska Native 45 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,355 80 65
Table 13 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 25
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,510 440 0
White 640 185 0
Black / African American 184 10 0
Asian 50 10 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,625 235 0
Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%

50%-80% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,370 1,060 0
White 880 420 0
Black / African American 150 20 0
Asian 40 29 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 15 0 0
Hispanic 2,245 585 0
Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 26
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,505 1,150 0
White 380 300 0
Black / African American 90 19 0
Asian 35 30 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 15 0 0
Hispanic 985 755 0
Table 16 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
Discussion
A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience housing problems at a rate at least 10 percentage points greater than the income level as a whole.

Table 13 Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI, shows that in the 0-30 percent income category, 100 percent of American Indian/Alaska Native households reported having one or more of the four housing problems, compared to only 90.5 percent of the income category as a whole. Also in this income category, 100 percent of Black/African American, American Indian, Alaska Native and Pacific Islander households reported no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems, compared to only 5.7% of the income category as a whole.

Table 14 Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI, shows that in the 30-50 percent income category, only the Hispanic category has a disproportionate percentage greater than 10%. There are

53.4% Hispanics in this category with none of the four housing problems, but 64.7% of Hispanics have one or more than four housing problems.

Table 15 Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI, shows that in the 50-80 percent income category, only the Hispanic category has a disproportionate percentage greater than 10%. There are

55.2% Hispanics in this category with none of the four housing problems, but 66.6% of Hispanics have one or more than four housing problems.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Table 16 Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI, does not show a disproportionate greater need i.e., the incidence of housing problems among the racial/ethnic group did not exceed that of the income level as a whole by at least 10 percentage points.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 28
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

As defined by HUD, the four housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities;

2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities;

3. More than 1.5 person per room; and

4. Cost burden greater than 50 percent.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,990 370 135
White 515 125 60
Black / African American 135 65 0
Asian 40 4 15
American Indian, Alaska Native 45 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,255 175 65
Table 17 – Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four severe housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 29
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,940 1,015 0
White 440 380 0
Black / African American 145 50 0
Asian 19 35 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,315 545 0
Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four severe housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%

50%-80% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,960 2,475 0
White 490 810 0
Black / African American 50 120 0
Asian 29 40 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 15 0 0
Hispanic 1,370 1,460 0
Table 19 – Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four severe housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 30
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 565 2,100 0
White 100 590 0
Black / African American 15 90 0
Asian 20 45 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 15 0
Hispanic 430 1,305 0
Table 20 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

*The four severe housing problems are:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4. Cost Burden over 50%

Discussion
A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience severe housing problems at a rate at least 10 percentage points greater than the income level as a whole.

Table 17 Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI, shows that in the 0-30 percent income category, 63.1% of Hispanics have one or more housing problems, compared with 47.3% that do not have one of the four housing problems.

Table 18 Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI, shows that in the 30-50 percent income category,

67.8% of Hispanics have one or more housing problems, compared with 53.7% that do not have one of the four housing problems.

Table 19 Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI, shows that in the 50-80 percent income category,

69.9% of Hispanics have one or more housing problems, compared with 59.0% that do not have one of the four housing problems.

Table 20 Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI, shows that in the 80-100 percent income category,

76.1% of Hispanics have one or more housing problems, compared with 62.1% that do not have one of the four housing problems.
.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 31
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
In all other racial/ethnic groups in all other income categories, no disproportionately greater need was observed; i.e., the incidence of severe housing problems among the racial/ethnic group did not exceed that of the income level as a whole by at least 10 percentage points.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 32
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

Introduction:

Housing cost burden is when a household’s cost of housing (including utility costs) exceeds 30 percent of the household gross income, and severe cost burden is when it exceeds 50 percent of the household gross income.

Housing Cost Burden
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 14,960 5,200 4,860 135
White 5,150 1,465 1,590 60
Black / African
American 555 290 305 0
Asian 400 225 110 15
American Indian,
Alaska Native 45 0 45 0
Pacific Islander 20 15 0 0
Hispanic 8,505 3,160 2,785 65
Table 21 – Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data
Source:
2013-2017 CHAS

Discussion:

A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group experience a housing cost burden at a rate at least 10 percentage points greater than the income level as a whole.

Table 21 Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI, shows that 42.9 percent of Pacific Islander households had a cost burden of more than 50 percent, compared to only 20.8 percent of total households. Additionally, 50.0% of American Indian, Alaska Native households had a cost burden of more than 50%.

In all other racial/ethnic groups no disproportionately greater need was observed; i.e., the incidence of a housing cost burden among the racial/ethnic group did not exceed that of the City as a whole by at least 10 percentage points.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 33
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? Yes. Please see discussions provided under specific needs by income group presented in previous sections. In summary, the following disproportionately greater needs exist:

Housing Problems
▪ 0‐30 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
▪ 30‐50 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
▪ 50‐80 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
▪ 80‐100 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
Severe Housing Problems
▪ 0‐30 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
▪ 30‐50 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
▪ 80‐100 percent AMI:

Hispanic households ‐‐ one or more housing problems
Housing Cost Burden
▪ >50 percent cost burden:

American Indian/Alaska Native and Pacific Islander Households

If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? No other housing needs were identified through City consultations. Housing rehabilitation was identified as a need through the public participation process, but was not specific to a particular racial/ethnic group.

Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?
See Attachment of maps illustrating the racial/ethnic concentrations within the city.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 34
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b)
Introduction
The city of Jurupa Valley does not have a housing authority. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) oversees public housing programs for Jurupa Valley and other participating jurisdictions. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) is a public agency chartered by the State of California to administer public housing programs for Jurupa Valley and other participating jurisdictions within the county. According to Table 22, Public Housing by Program Type below, there are a total of 456 public housing units and 8,748 unit vouchers in the HACR area. In order to quality for these programs, residents must have an annual gross income at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), or be seniors or persons with disabilities.

Totals in Use
Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units vouchers in use 0 79 456 8,748 36 8,364 135 178 19 Table 22 - Public Housing by Program Type
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition

Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 35
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Characteristics of Residents

Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Average Annual Income 0 12,664 13,261 13,870 10,805 13,850 13,465 14,983 Average length of stay 0 6 4 6 2 6 0 5
Average Household size 0 1 3 2 1 2 1 3
# Homeless at admission 0 2 331 205 1 197 2 5
# of Elderly Program Participants
(>62) 0 67 38 3,249 9 3,211 15 10
# of Disabled Families 0 12 70 2,587 26 2,422 82 33
# of Families requesting
accessibility features 0 79 456 8,748 36 8,364 135 178
# of HIV/AIDS program
participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 23 – Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type

Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 36
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Race of Residents
Program Type
Race Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
White 0 66 318 5,469 26 5,195 79 144 15
Black/African American 0 10 126 2,967 8 2,867 55 29 3
Asian 0 1 9 209 2 203 0 2 1
American Indian/Alaska
Native 0 0 2 80 0 76 1 3 0
Pacific Islander 0 2 1 23 0 23 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 24 – Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Ethnicity of Residents
Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
Hispanic 0 29 250 2,318 7 2,220 13 74 1
Not Hispanic 0 50 206 6,430 29 6,144 122 104 18
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 25 – Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 37
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units:

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act protects all eligible residents from discrimination in HUD-funded programs. For those that qualify for a HUD program, no one can be denied the right to participate or benefit from it on the basis of disability.

Public Housing. In relation to Section 504, Table 23, Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, shows that of the 456 public housing units, 70 are disabled families, and all 456 families requested accessibility features. According to the City’s Housing Element, as of December 2021, 344 Jurupa Valley households were living in public housing units managed by the HACR, and there were 2,449 Jurupa Valley households on the waiting list for public housing.

Vouchers. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside provides rental assistance through its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV). HACR administers the HCV program and provides decent and safe rental housing for eligible low-income families, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. Table 23, Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, shows that of the total 8,748 vouchers, 2,587 disabled families participate in the voucher program and 100 percent of the participant families requested accessibility features. The most recent information from the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) estimates that 337 Jurupa Valley households currently receive rental assistance. There are 232 households that are seniors, 157 that are disabled, 7 veterans, and no homeless currently receiving assistance. This information may be duplicated where some seniors are also disabled and some disabled are also seniors. There is also a waiting list of 2,449 Jurupa Valley households. Of those on the waiting list, 418 households are identified as seniors, 595 as disabled, 7 as veterans, and 628 as homeless.

Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders Public Housing. As shown in Table 22, Public Housing by Program Type, according to the most recently available information from the PIH Information Center, there were 456 households in public housing in Jurupa Valley. Table 23, Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, shows that 331 households were homeless at admission, and 70 had a member with a disability. One hundred percent of households requested accessibility features. In addition, there are 38 participants of elderly programs (>62 years) and 70 disabled families in public housing. No households reported participating in the HIV/AIDS program or a domestic violence victim.

Race/ethnicity of public housing residents is not reported exclusively; residents can identify with more than one race/ethnicity. According to PIH data and as shown in Table 24, Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, Whites formed the largest racial group among public housing residents, with 318 residents or 69.7% of participants. Over one-quarter (27.6%) of participants identify as Black/African American, two percent as Asian, and less than one percent as American Indian/Alaska Native and Pacific Islander. As shown in Table 25, Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, 54.8 of all participants identify as Hispanic.

Average annual income of public housing tenants was $13,261.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 38
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Immediate needs of public housing residents:
▪ Affordable housing
▪ Homeless services
▪ Housing for persons with disabilities
Vouchers. As shown in Table 22, Public Housing by Program Type, there were 8,748 total households in the HACR area receiving Housing Choice voucher assistance. As presented in Table23, Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, 3,249 voucher users in the City have householders who are elderly (>62) and 2,587 were persons with disabilities. One hundred percent of households requested accessibility features. The majority of these vouchers are tenant based (8,364). The average annual income for these voucher holders is $13,850 and the average length of stay is six years.

Race/ethnicity of voucher holders is not reported exclusively; voucher holders can identify with more than one race/ethnicity. According to PIH data and as shown in Table 24, Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, 62.5% of voucher holders identify as White. Approximately a third (33.9%) of the voucher holder identify as Black/African American and 2.4% identify as Asian. As shown in Table 25, Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, about one-quarter (26.5%) of voucher holders identify as being of Hispanic origin.

Average annual income of voucher households was $13,870.

Immediate needs of public housing residents:
▪ Affordable housing
▪ Housing for seniors
▪ Housing for persons with disabilities

How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large The racial composition of public housing residents and voucher recipients in the HACR programs in general did not match the population at large of the Black/African American group. According to Table 24, Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type, the Black/African American racial group represented 27.6% of the total public housing residents and 33.9% of the total voucher residents. In comparison, this same racial group citywide represented only 5.9% (DP05). This difference indicates a disproportionate representation of Black/African American residents in the public housing/voucher programs relative to the population at large. A comparison of the Hispanic/Non-Hispanic differences is presented in Table 25, Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type. It shows that while Hispanic residents represented 54.8% of the total public housing and 26.5% of the total voucher residents, the Citywide population of Hispanic residents was 74.7% (DP05). This difference indicates that Hispanics are underrepresented in the public housing program and especially in the voucher programs.

Discussion
Please see discussion about public housing and vouchers above.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 39
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c)
Introduction:

Homeless researchers typically use one of two methods to measure homelessness. One method attempts to count all persons that are literally homeless on a given day/week (point-in-time counts). The second, examines the number of people who are homeless over a given period - period prevalence counts. The Riverside County Continuum of Care (RC-CoC) uses the first method for its biennial enumeration of the region’s homeless.

The most recent Point-In-Time (PIT) homeless count survey of the region’s homeless was published in June 2022. The 2022 PIT includes information regarding the number of unsheltered homeless in Jurupa Valley and general demographic information regarding the region’s homeless population. On a county-wide basis, the 2022 PIT identified 3,316 homeless individuals (1,980 sheltered and 1,336 unsheltered).

Specifically, the PIT identities 105 unsheltered homeless in Jurupa Valley, just 3.2 percent of the County’s unsheltered homeless population.

Jurupa Valley makes up 4.3% of Riverside County’s population (DOF E-5).

If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):

As indicated above, the 2022 PIT identified 105 homeless individuals in Jurupa Valley – 4.3% of the County’s total unsheltered homeless population –a proportion less than the City’s population (3.2%).

Chronic Homeless: A chronically homeless individual/family is typically defined as an unaccompanied individual or family living in an emergency shelter or is unsheltered, with a disabling condition, who has been continuously homeless for a year or more or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past 3 years. The 2022 PIT estimates there are 32 chronic unsheltered homeless individuals in Jurupa Valley.

Families with Children: The 2022 PIT identified no homeless family in its survey of the region’s homeless; however, the HARC reports there are 628 Jurupa Valley homeless households on the waitlist for rental assistance.

Veterans & their Families: The City’s 2022 PIT reports 3 Jurupa Valley homeless are veterans. The HARC reports 7 Jurupa Valley veterans are on the waitlist for rental assistance.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 40
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Unaccompanied Youth: The 2022 PIT identified 12 unaccompanied youth (i.e., persons under the age of 24) among Jurupa Valley’s homeless population.

Individuals with HIV/AIDS: The 2022 PIT identified 1 homeless person with HIV/AIDS in Jurupa Valley.

Other characteristics or sub-populations of Jurupa Valley homeless identified in the 2022 PIT include the following:
▪ Approximately 33.0% are identified as drug users.
▪ Approximately 22.0% have a physical disability, 20.0% have a mental health condition, and 23.1% suffer from PTSD. ▪ Three individuals were identified as victims of domestic abuse.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 41
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race:

Race data only provided for
unsheltered population
Sheltered:

Not Available
Unsheltered (optional)
American Indian: 1%
Asian: 0%
Black, African American: 20%
Native Hawaiian/Pac Ise: 1%
White: 49%
Multiple Races: 10%
Unknown Race: 19%

Ethnicity:

Ethnicity data only provided
for unsheltered population

Sheltered:

Not Available
Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic: 30%
Non-Hispanic: 44%
Unknown Ethnicity: 26%

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans.

As outlined previously, the 2022 PIT did not identify any unsheltered homeless family with children and three unsheltered veteran households among Jurupa Valley’s unsheltered homeless population. The HARC reports that 628 homeless households and 7 veteran households are on the waitlist for housing assistance. Unfortunately, the HARC information does not provide household detail in order to determine if the respective “households” include families with minor children.

Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.

City of Jurupa Valley racial/ethnicity data was only collected for the unsheltered homeless population in 2022. The unsheltered homeless data for 2022 in Jurupa Valley shows that while the White population is

87.4% of City, it makes up 49% of homeless population. And, Black or African American make up 5.7% of the City’s population, this group makes up 20% of the homeless population. Also, the Asian population group makes up 4.5% of City and 0% of homeless population. Regarding Hispanic ethnicity – they make up 74.7% of population and 30% of homeless population.

Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.

As previously noted, the 2022 PITS identified 9 sheltered and 96 unsheltered homeless (totaling 105 person) in Jurupa Valley.

The regional 2022 PIT did not report sheltered homeless by city of last residence. Sheltered homeless were reported as a cumulative. A majority of the region’s 3,316 homeless individuals were unsheltered (60%). A total of 1,336 homeless were sheltered (40%) at the time the 2022 PIT was undertaken.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 42
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Discussion:

The 2022 Point-In-Time count for Riverside County identified 105 unsheltered homeless in Jurupa Valley.

There were 32 of these individuals are identified as chronic homeless, 3 are identified as veterans, and 12 are under the age of 24. The PIT did not identify any homeless family with children; however, the HARC has reported 628 homeless households are waiting for rental assistance. Additionally, 7 veteran households are waiting for rental assistance.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 43
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) Introduction:

Certain segments of the population experience conditions that make it difficult for them to access affordable housing. Physical or medical conditions, particular space or supportive service requirements, incomes, or other factors may impede a household’s ability to obtain decent and affordable housing.

This section briefly describes the characteristics of the special needs populations in Jurupa Valley.

Special needs groups include, but are not limited to, the elderly, persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities, persons with HIV/AID, and domestic violence.

Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:

Elderly/Frail Elderly. According to 2021 ACS data, Jurupa Valley had 10,169 people who were age 65 and over, accounting for 9.5 of the total population. Some of the characteristics of the special needs residents included having limited mobility, increased medical attention due to health complications and restricted fixed income, such as Social Security, pension programs and retirement income. Many elderly people have difficulty completing normal, everyday tasks without assistance. The 2021 ACS data (ACS Table C18108) estimates that 22.8% of the Jurupa Valley’s elderly had at least one disability and 14.7% had two or more disabilities. According to the U.S. Census Bureau classifies disabilities into the following categories:
▪ Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing. ▪ Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses. ▪ Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions.
▪ Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs. ▪ Self-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing. ▪ Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping.

Persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities. Based on the 2021 ACS S1810 data, the number of Jurupa Valley residents age five and older with some type of disability totaled 7,907, which was 7.4% of the City’s total civilian non-institutionalized population age five and older. Having a disability negatively impacts a person’s ability to work and earn money. Approximately 1,629, or 20.6% of persons with disabilities age 18 to 64 in Jurupa Valley had incomes below the federal poverty level.

This compares with 6,278 persons with no disability that are not in poverty. (2021 ACS C18130).

Persons with alcohol or other drug addiction. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services conducts the annual National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (2020) for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The survey estimated that approximately 5.2 million California residents 12 years and older population had a substance use disorder. Substance use disorder is defined as meeting criteria for illicit drug or alcohol dependence or abuse. Alcohol dependence or abuse affected 3.9 million, while illicit drug dependence or abuse affected 2.1 million Californians 12 and over. In addition, the survey found CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 44
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
that about 2.1 million residents 12 and over that needed help did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for substance use.

Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. The California Department of Public Health’s California HIV Surveillance Report for 2020 estimates that there were approximately 10,199 people living with a diagnosed HIV infection in Riverside County. This represents 7.3% of HIV-diagnosed residents statewide in 2020. Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, the persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment. In addition, persons with HIV/AIDS may be targets of hate crimes and discrimination, including illegal eviction from their homes when their illness is exposed.

The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS. In addition, persons with HIV/AID are not generally able to hold jobs involving frequent interaction with the public due to their immune system deficiencies.

Therefore, their job inventory is much less diverse than that for the typical citizen. Job placement could be imperative for this group to maintain sufficient income to afford their medication and live in decent and affordable housing.

The City of Riverside is the Grantee of the HOPWA formula funding for both Riverside and San Bernardino County. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) as the Project Sponsor administers the HOPWA grant throughout Riverside County. The HOPWA program prevents homelessness for individuals and/or families that have AIDS/HIV by providing long term rental assistance through the Housing Options Program and Short-Term Rental, Mortgage and Utility Assistance. The Housing Options Program provides 90 units of permanent affordable housing via tenant based rental assistance to households at or below 80 percent of AMI.

Victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Victims of domestic violence are typically women and/or youth. Both groups become victims to crimes such as rape, battery or assault. Moreover, those with below moderate-income levels are at greater risk as well. As stated in section NA-10, it is estimated that in California, 54.3 percent of women and 30.7 percent have been victimized by rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner. If these rates are applied to the Jurupa Valley’s population, the resulting estimate would be approximately 55,854 women and 32,353 men residing in the city who have suffered at one point or another from domestic/dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined?
Elderly/Frail Elderly. As people age, their dependency on Social Security and pension programs increases as these become their income sources. In 2022, Social Security reported that nearly nine out of ten people age 65 and over were receiving Social Security benefits. Though, Social Security represents about 30% of the income of the elderly. And, seniors in Riverside County have low annual benefit amounts. Since seniors have high disability and poverty rates – their incomes may only cover a portion of their expenses, including housing costs. In addition to housing costs, there is also the need for CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 45
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
common elderly services that include public transportation, home delivery services, and at-home medical care.

Some senior programs in the City of Jurupa Valley have been offered in partnership with Jurupa Valley Adopt a Family program, a community-based organization, and Healthy Jurupa Valley. Services and programs provided include assistance to senior households during the holiday seasons, and workshops catering to senior residents; recent workshop topics include returning to work after retirement. Through Healthy Jurupa Valley, seniors are also invited to attend senior health fairs. Additionally, the Jurupa Community Services District Recreation and Parks Department provides a Senior Mentoring Program that focuses on providing enrichment and/or general assistance to senior citizens, including assistance with everyday tasks and exposing seniors to new activities.

In terms of affordable housing resources, there are 357 affordable rental units in four rental properties throughout Jurupa Valley that are restricted for seniors, with renter qualifications not to exceed anywhere from 50 percent to 80 percent of median income. Seniors in the City are also served by 11 state-licensed residential care facilities for the elderly and 15 adult residential facilities with a combined capacity to serve 379 persons. In addition, Country Village Apartments provides 1,238 senior apartments, with rents affordable to low- and moderate-income households.

Persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities. Having a disability negatively impacts a person’s ability to work and earn money. Approximately one-fifth (20.6%) of persons with disabilities in Jurupa Valley age 18 years and over, lived in households with incomes below the federal poverty level. (2021 ACS Table C18130) Therefore, access and availability to affordable housing is a key housing issue among persons with disabilities. In addition, other needs include: group living supportive care housing; in-home social, educational, and medical support; housing designed to accommodate persons with physical disabilities; and proximity to services and transit.

A number of non-profit agencies provide supportive services to persons with disabilities living in Jurupa Valley. Arc of Riverside County is a private, non-profit corporation serving adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. Arc of Riverside County operates six facilities in Western Riverside County providing services for those in need of full-time programming to ensure the development and maintenance of functional skills required for self-advocacy, community integration, and self-care. In addition, the Community Access Center (CAC), an independent living center located in the City of Riverside, has been providing services to people with disabilities in the County since 1995. CAC provides information, supportive services, and independent living skills training.

Persons with alcohol or other drug addiction. Persons with alcohol and drug addiction have difficulty securing a job and maintaining their housing situation. As previous mentioned, for the 2020 year, an estimated 5.2 million California residents 12 years and older had a substance use disorder. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), there are at least 18 facilities within a 10-mile radius of Jurupa Valley that treat substance abuse or have detoxification programs available to the public. Most of these facilities (13 of 18) are located in the City of Riverside. None are located within Jurupa Valley city limits.

Providing vouchers or other financial assistance could aid this special needs group in gaining improved access to treatment and housing.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 46
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For many, the persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment. Based on average housing costs, persons with HIV/AIDS could be forced to pay a large portion of their income that might otherwise go toward monthly rent or mortgage for health care.

As previously mentioned, the City of Riverside is currently named a grantee by HUD and HACR serves as Project Sponsor for the County of Riverside and is responsible for procuring services and disbursing HOPWA funds. To be eligible for HOPWA services, individuals must be (1) HIV positive, (2) low income as defined by HUD, and (3) be homeless or at risk of being homeless. Individuals who are not eligib le for HOPWA services may be eligible for housing services through the HIV Care Program or the Housing Plus Project.

Victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Victims of domestic violence are typically women and/or youth. These groups commonly need either proper placement in temporary foster homes or additional financial support; legal services or counseling to deal with domestic violence.

The continued services provided by the following organizations are needed:
▪ Riverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence. Services include: emergency shelter, crisis line, counseling center, and children's program for victims of domestic violence. ▪ Riverside County Family Justice Center. Services include: personalized safety planning, restraining and protective orders, relocation assistance, emergency assistance, family law legal assistance, counseling for adults and children, safe and comfortable children’s play room, applying for CalVCP - victim compensation program, help navigating the criminal justice system, crime victim rights information, court support, and restitution assistance. ▪ Other resources providing emergency services in the vicinity of Jurupa Valley include: Riverside Community Shelter; Path of Life Family Shelter; Corona Norco Rescue Mission.

Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area:

The California Department of Public Health’s California HIV Surveillance Report for 2020 estimates that there were approximately 10,199 people living with diagnoses HIV infection in Riverside County.

Discussion:

The key housing and supportive service needs of on the non-homeless special needs population include:
▪ The elderly have a high dependency on Social Security/SSI and many do not have enough income to meet basic needs including housing costs. This group also needs common elderly services that include public transportation, home delivery services, at-home medical care, and public programs to expose seniors to new activities.
▪ Persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities need access and availability to affordable housing is a key housing. This issue among persons with disabilities. Other needs include: group living supportive care housing; in-home social, educational, and medical support; CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 47
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
housing designed to accommodate persons with physical disabilities; and proximity to services and transit.
▪ Persons with alcohol and drug addiction have difficulty securing a job and maintaining their housing situation. Providing vouchers or other financial assistance could aid this special needs group in gaining improved access to treatment and housing. ▪ Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For many, the persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment.
▪ Victims of domestic violence are typically women and/or youth. These groups commonly need either proper placement in temporary foster homes or additional financial support, legal services or counseling to deal with domestic violence.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 48
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities:

Community Facilities. The results of the ConPlan survey shows that Youth Centers and Parks and Recreational Facilities are the two most important community facilities needs within the city. These two needs were ranked one and three in importance. Parks and Recreational Facilities and Youth Centers are closely related because many of the younger aged residents of the City would benefit the most from these public facilities. According to 2021 ACS Table DP05 data, 27.7 percent of the residents of Jurupa Valley are children and youth under the age of 18. Youth facilities give young people an alternative to delinquency and provide them a safe haven where they can socialize without the threat of criminal or violent activity. Several children/youth centers and programs in the City that need to continue include:
▪ YMCA Youth Center
▪ Rubidoux Youth Opportunity Center
▪ Youth Center of Jurupa Valley
▪ Youth Skills Center
▪ Jurupa Valley Adopt a Family
▪ Various religious organizations offering youth programs (i.e., Islamic Center of Jurupa Valley) ▪ City of Jurupa Valley Department of Park and Recreations (parks and recreational facilities providing youth programs)
How were these needs determined?
Community facilities needs were determined based on results from the ConPlan survey, ACS data regarding the population under the age of 18.

Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements:

The results from ConPlan survey indicate that Street Improvements, Street Lighting, and Sidewalks/Gutters/ADA Curbs/ were the top three important needs of the City. Public improvements are identified in the City Public Works and Engineering Department’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) each year. According to the adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2023 CIP for the five-year period 2022-23 to 2026-27, approximately $138,092.507 million is budgeted for capital improvements within the city.

Approximately $39,079,495 is budgeted for 2022-23, which includes 35 projects. New projects include:
pavement management and maintenance; street widening; interchange improvements; grade separation; traffic signal installation; ADA curb, ramp, and sidewalk upgrades.

As previously mentioned, over 10,000 of the city’s total population are elderly (65 years and over) and

14.7% of the elderly have two or more types of disability. In addition, 7.4% of the city’s total civilian non- institutionalized population five years and older also have some type of disability. Therefore, ADA curbs, ramps, and sidewalk upgrades are a priority public infrastructure improvement need.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 49
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
How were these needs determined?
ADA curbs, ramps, and sidewalk upgrades were identified as a need based on the City Public Works and Engineering Department's CIP, results from the ConPlan survey, and information derived from the ACS data regarding the elderly and persons with disabilities.

Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services:

The ConPlan survey indicated that Crime Awareness Programs, Mental Health and Graffiti Removal were ranked as the top three needs under the Public Service category.

Crime: The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department provides police services in Jurupa Valley. According to the General Plan, the Jurupa Valley Sheriff’s Station responds to approximately 35,000 total calls per year.

Regarding mental health – City of Jurupa Valley addresses this issue, in part, by contracting with non- profits to provide rental assistance from one to twelve months, or permanent housing, physical / mental health services, substance abuse, rehab intervention programs, free meals for seniors, who may have mental health and other issues, job placement assistance and life skills services.

Graffiti: The Sheriff’s Department and the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) regularly patrol the City for graffiti to enable quick eradication and limit its proliferation. Jurupa Valley residents are encouraged to report graffiti vandalism. The City contracts with the JCSD and the Riverside County Economic Development Agency to paint out graffiti in the City. The Sheriff’s Department also actively pursues conviction of graffiti vandals in accordance with local and state laws.

According to the Jurupa Valley General Plan Land Use Element, the city’s population growth is projected to increase, under buildout conditions, by 35 to 50 percent by the year 2035. This level of growth would increase the city’s total population to about 133,000 to 148,000 residents in 2035. With a continued population, housing, and economic growth projected for Jurupa Valley, more police staffing/patrols and crime prevention programs will be required in the city.

How were these needs determined?
Needs were based on growth projection in the City’s General Plan and from the results of public outreach work, including the ConPlan Survey.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 50
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 Overview
Housing Market Analysis Overview:

The purpose of the Market Analysis is to provide a clear picture of the environment in which the City will administer its CDBG programs over the term of the Plan. The Market Analysis includes the following sections:
▪ Number of Housing Units, Cost of Housing, Condition of Housing ▪ Public and Assisted Housing
▪ Homeless Facilities and Services
▪ Special Needs Facilities and Services
▪ Barriers to Affordable Housing
▪ Non-Housing Community Development Assets
▪ Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
In conjunction with the Needs Assessment, the Market Analysis provides the basis for the Strategic Plan and the programs and projects to be administered. Most of the data tables in this section are populated with default Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data developed by the Census Bureau for HUD based on American Community Survey (ACS) data. Other sources are noted throughout the Plan.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 51
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2)
Introduction
The City’s housing stock as of the 2013-2017 ACS consisted of 26,529 total residential units, 77% of which were single-family detached homes (Residential Properties by Unit Number Table). The 2013- 2017 ACS data is automatically provided by HUD; according to more recent data from the California Department of Finance (2022 E-5 estimate), the City’s housing stock grew to 28,192 units by 2022.

About 2% of units are in small multi-family structures of 2-4 units, while another 18% are in larger structures of 5 units or more. As presented in the Unit Size by Tenure Table, owner and renter occupied units totaled 25,160 units. Of these, about 65.8% were owner-occupied and 34.2% were renter- occupied. The vast majority of owner-occupied units – 87% -- had three or more bedrooms, while about 60% of renter-occupied units had two bedrooms or fewer.

All residential properties by number of units
Property Type Number %
1-unit detached structure 20,475 77%
1-unit, attached structure 865 3%
2-4 units 535 2%
5-19 units 1,595 6%
20 or more units 1,235 5%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 1,824 7%
Total 26,529 100%
Table 23 – Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Unit Size by Tenure
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 165 1% 530 6%
1 bedroom 250 2% 1,570 18%
2 bedrooms 1,740 11% 3,115 36%
3 or more bedrooms 14,395 87% 3,395 39%
Total 16,550 101% 8,610 99%
Table 24 – Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 52
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.

There are a total of 382 units of affordable housing in Jurupa Valley. These housing developments utilizing federal, state, and/or local programs, including state and local bond programs, Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), density bonus, or direct assistance programs, are often restricted for use as low-income housing and provide another source of affordable housing for a jurisdiction. Senior 55+ Communities in Jurupa Valley include: Mission Palms I, Mission Palms II, Mission Village Senior and Mission Villas. Housing for families, non-age restricted include Vista Rio Apartments.

Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.

State law requires that the City identify rental units that are eligible to convert to non-low-income housing uses due to termination of subsidy contract, mortgage prepayment, or expiring use restrictions during the next 10 years. According to data from the City’s Housing Element, within the at-risk analysis period of 10 years, only one project is considered to be at-risk of converting to market-rate housing, the 54-unit Mission Villas senior housing, funded with Section 202 financing and Section 8 project-based rent subsidies. The project was placed in service in 1998 and carries 40-year low-income use restriction.

This project has a low risk of converting to market-rate housing because HUD has prioritized funding for Section 8 renewals for senior projects. In February 2020 the Section 8 contract was last renewed for Mission Village.

Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? As discussed in the Needs Assessment section, 5,210 households (20.7% of the City’s total households) spend over 30% of their income on housing considered the threshold for overpayment. Thus, the supply of affordable housing for lower income households is a high priority goal. The need is further substantiated by the waiting list (as of January 2023) maintained by the Riverside County Housing Authority, which provides rental subsidies to low-income families that spend more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing costs. As of January 2023, the number of Jurupa Valley households on the waiting list was 2,495 residents, according to the Housing Authority. This illustrates the need for affordable housing in the City.

In addition, the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the City of Jurupa Valley, as determined by SCAG allocated the regional “fair share” of housing needs to the City of Jurupa Valley for the 2021- 2029 period. According to the RHNA, Jurupa Valley must be able to accommodate 4,497 housing units during the subject period. Of this total, Jurupa Valley must be able to accommodate at least 1,207 units (26.8%) for very low and 729 units (16.7%) for low-income households during the 2021-2029 period.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 53
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe the need for specific types of housing:

Discussion
The City analyzed its ability to meet Regional Housing Needs. The results of this analysis shows that the City’s land inventory, including projects approved and the potential development of vacant and underutilized parcels, exceeds by 1,822 units, the net remaining RHNA for the planning period in all income categories, including: Extremely low income (+231), Low income (+55), Moderate (+362), and Above Moderate (+1,174). However, there is a deficit of RHNA units in the Extremely Low (-529) and Low (-354) income categories if sites within the City of Jurupa Valley are not redesignated for higher density housing.

To accommodate need for Extremely Low and Very Low-income housing, the City is committed to working with the Riverside Housing Authority, housing non-profits, and housing developers to identify specific sites for developing housing suitable for extremely low and very-low income households, including seniors, disabled persons, veterans, farm workers and the homeless.

To increase the City’s affordable housing stock, the City proposes various incentives to allow housing to be built at a density of up to 25 dwelling units per acre. Other incentives may include permit “fast tracking,” housing grants, inclusionary housing program (IHP) and development assistance.

The City’s housing stock is primarily single family detached homes (77%), with most residents owning their homes (65%). For a City of over 26,000 housing units, there are only 382 units of affordable housing. In the City, approximately 20% of all households (5,210 total) overpay for housing, which is defined as spending at least 30 percent of their income on housing. The City is working with the Riverside Housing Authority, housing non-profits, and housing developers to identify specific sites for developing housing suitable for targeting extremely low and very-low income households, including seniors, disabled persons, veterans, farm workers and the homeless.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 54
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction
According to data from the 2013-2017 ACS automatically provided by HUD, Jurupa Valley’s median home value in 2017 was $308,900. According to 2013-2017 ACS data, the majority (52.8%) of Jurupa Valley’s renter households paid at least $1,000 or more, but 47.3 paid less than $1000 in monthly rent.

The 2013-2017 ACS shows that median contract rent in 2017 was $1,046. (Jurupa Valley is one of the youngest cities in California, incorporated in 2011, and for this reason there is no baseline data from the year 2000.)
Cost of Housing
Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change
Median Home Value 0 308,900 0%
Median Contract Rent 0 1,046 0%
Table 25 – Cost of Housing

Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year)

Rent Paid Number %
Less than $500 860 10.0%
$500-999 3,210 37.3%
$1,000-1,499 3,445 40.0%
$1,500-1,999 905 10.5%
$2,000 or more 195 2.3%
Total 8,615 100.1%
Table 26 - Rent Paid
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Housing Affordability
% Units affordable to Households
earning
Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 239 No Data
50% HAMFI 814 550
80% HAMFI 3,454 1,550
100% HAMFI No Data 2,544
Total 4,507 4,644
Table 27 – Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 55
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Monthly Rent
Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no
bedroom)
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom
Fair Market Rent 0 0 0 0 0
High HOME Rent 0 0 0 0 0
Low HOME Rent 0 0 0 0 0
Table 28 – Monthly Rent
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents

Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? According to the limited data available, there is not sufficient housing for households at lower income levels in Jurupa Valley. According to 2013-2017 CHAS data from HUD, there were 1,435 renter households making 30 percent HAMFI or less, but only 239 units affordable to a household at the 30 percent level (Housing Affordability Table). Also, according to CHAS data, there were 1,605 households making between 30 and 50 percent HAMFI, but only 814 units affordable to a household at the 50 percent level. Additionally, the fact that a housing unit is affordable to a particular income level does not necessarily mean that it is occupied by a household at that income level, meaning that the affordability mismatch is very likely more severe than reported in the data.

How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
There was a tremendous increase in property values in Jurupa Valley during the previous years.

According to Redfin, the median price of a home in Jurupa Valley was $560,000 in December 2022.

Although home prices are expected to drop in 2023, it may not be enough of a change to accommodate families with affordability needs. Since the vast majority of housing units affordable to lower-income households are rental units, it is likely that the number of units affordable for lower-income households will decrease going forward.

How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? HUD provided HOME rents and fair market rent for 2022 for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA, and they are listed below:

Monthly Rent
Monthly Rent ($)
Efficiency
(no
bedroom)
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
Fair Market Rent $1,062 $1,202 $1,509 $2,065 $2,542
High HOME Rent $981 $1,053 $1,266 $1,454 $1,603
Low HOME Rent $770 $825 $990 $1,144 $1,276

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 56
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Source: HUD, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA, 2022 The rents at the smaller housing units (efficiency and 1 bedroom unit) are similar at the Fair Market and High Home rent levels. Across all housing units, the Low HOME rent levels are significantly below Fair Market and High HOME rent levels. And, at the larger housing units (units with three and four bedrooms) the difference between Fair Market and both HOME levels vary significantly. What the data shows is that it will be very difficult to produce and preserve affordable housing because the incentives or profits for building market rate housing are great. Concurrently, the level of subsidies that will be needed to provide to a developer to build affordable housing will be high, and given the level of limited resources, less units will be able to either be built or preserved in the future at affordable housing levels.

Discussion
Increasing housing prices have had the effect of pricing out lower income household’s ability to purchase homes. Even if prices drop within the next few years, the price drop may not be enough to provide significant opportunities to lower income households. There is not sufficient housing for households at lower income levels in Jurupa Valley. Also, there has been a significant rise in rents recently. Since the vast majority of housing units affordable to lower-income households are rental units, it appears that there will be a decreasing number of units at this price level, given increased demand, without concurrent supply of new affordable housing units. Also, it will be very difficult to produce and preserve affordable housing because incentives for building market rate housing are great.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 57
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) Introduction
The U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) defines a “selected Condition” as one of four types of housing problems, similar to those used in the Needs Assessment: 1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, 2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, 3) more than one person per room, and 4) cost burden greater than 30%. Table 37 calculates the total number of owner- and renter-occupied units exhibiting different numbers of selected conditions, and the percentage of all units falling into each of these categories.

Based on these categories, approximately one-half (50.2%) of all households have none of the selected conditions, while 49.6% have either one or two conditions, and a small number (less than one percent) have three or four conditions. However, renter households are more likely to experience problems. In all, 53% of all renter-occupied households have at least one condition, compared to only 38% of owner-occupied households.

Definitions
Jurupa Valley identified that approximately 1,300 housing units, less than 0.5% of the City’s housing stock may be considered substandard in the City. Substandard housing conditions refer to the inability of various systems in a house to meet adopted building codes for health and safety, including plumbing, heating, electrical, and structural systems. Housing conditions are considered substandard when one or more systems are found to be below the minimum standards required by Section 1001 of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered to be in need of housing assistance, even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements, due to the threat to residents’ health and safety that substandard housing poses. In addition to structural deficiencies and standards, the lack of infrastructure and utilities often serves as an indicator for substandard conditions. In addition, data from the 2013-2017 ACS table identifies 475 owner-occupied units and 1,240 rental units with two or more selected conditions.

Condition of Units
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 6,225 38% 4,530 53%
With two selected Conditions 475 3% 1,240 14%
With three selected Conditions 0 0% 55 1%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 9,855 60% 2,785 32%
Total 16,555 101% 8,610 100%
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 58
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Table 29 - Condition of Units
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Year Unit Built
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later 2,040 12% 985 11%
1980-1999 6,535 39% 2,045 24%
1950-1979 6,755 41% 4,470 52%
Before 1950 1,215 7% 1,110 13%
Total 16,545 99% 8,610 100%
Table 30 – Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS

Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 7,970 48% 5,580 65% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 2,830 17% 1,825 21% Table 31 – Risk of Lead-Based Paint
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Total Units) 2013-2017 CHAS (Units with Children present)

Vacant Units
Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Total
Vacant Units 0 0 0
Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0
REO Properties 0 0 0
Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0
Table 32 - Vacant Units

Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The City of Jurupa Valley has identified the need to provide its residents with a housing rehabilitation program. There are approximately 1,300 housing units in need of repairs, per City’s Housing Element. In addition, data from the 2013-2017 ACS table identified over 1,700 units with two or more conditions that may be addressed by housing rehabilitation programs.

The City is working to continuing to provide a housing rehabilitation program using CDBG funds for the near future.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 59
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards
Discussion
Although lead was banned from residential paint in 1978, more than three-fourths of homes constructed prior to 1978 (national average) may contain lead-based paint (LBP). And, local data have confirmed that the percentage of units containing LBP increases with the age of the structure. The use of lead was widespread in older homes, which often cost less and are therefore more likely to be occupied by lower-income families -- posing an increased risk to this income group.
12,545 households -- about 49.9 percent of all households in the City -- had incomes less than or equal to 80 percent HAMFI.

The age of housing units is the key variable for estimating the number of units with LBP hazards. According to 2013-2017 CHAS data, there were a total of 13,550, or 74.4% of total units built prior to 1980. If 75 percent of these properties can be assumed to have LBP, the number of units with LBP is estimated to be 10,163. According to the Needs Assessment of this Plan, approximately 49.9% of all households in the City were low- or moderate-income (defined here as less than or equal to 100 percent HAMFI). Assuming that this percentage holds true for the estimated 10,163 units with LBP, the number of lower-income households potentially exposed to LBP hazards is estimated to be 5,071. As stated earlier, the lower cost of older units makes them more likely to be occupied by lower-income households, meaning that this estimate could be low.

Approximately half (49.6%) of all owner households have one or two housing substandard conditions. Renter households have worse housing conditions. The City identified approximately 1,300 housing units in need of repairs and Census data showed that over 1,700 housing units had two or more substandard conditions that may be addressed by housing rehabilitation programs. Also, the number of housing units that have lead based paint is significant and many households that are exposed to lead are in the lower income categories.

The City is planning on continuing to implement its housing rehabilitation program using CDBG funds for the near future.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 60
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b)
Introduction
There are a small number of public housing units in the City of Jurupa Valley. Most housing assistance is provided in the form of vouchers. There is not a housing authority in the City, although there is good coordination with the County Housing Authority to provide services to some residents of Jurupa Valley.

Totals Number of Units
Program Type
Certificate Mod-Rehab Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -based Tenant -based

Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units vouchers
available 0 77 469 8,681 48 8,633 819 1,759 342
# of accessible units 2
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 33 – Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Describe the supply of public housing developments:

There are no public housing facilities owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) owns and operates 38 conventional public housing units in Jurupa Valley.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 61
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan:

According to PIH Information Center data, there are 469 public housing units in Jurupa Valley. Of these, none have been inspected in 2022 or later by HUD’s Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC).

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 62
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score

Table 34 - Public Housing Condition

Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:

This information was not available.

Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing:

Jurupa Valley does not have a public housing agency or authority.

Discussion:

Though the City does not have, and is not affiliated with, a housing authority, the City’s goals are to continue working with the County Housing Authority, in order to provide housing services to its residents.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 63
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c)
Introduction
The County of Riverside is responsible for the oversight and coordination of the region’s homeless system of care. This system of care is known as a Continuum of Care. The Riverside County Continuum of Care (RC-CoC) is designed to quickly rehouse homeless individuals and families to minimize the trauma and displacement caused to homeless individuals and families by homelessness. The RC-CoC promotes access to mainstream programs so homeless individuals and families can achieve self-sufficiency. The RC-CoC is also responsible for conducting a regional Point-In-Time (PIT) of the homeless. The PIT identified 105 unsheltered homeless in Jurupa Valley at the time it was conducted in January 2022.

Based on the 2022 regional homeless count, Jurupa Valley has the second highest number of homeless persons among incorporated and unincorporated areas in Riverside County.

Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional
Housing Beds
Permanent Supportive Housing
Beds
Year Round Beds
(Current & New)
Voucher /
Seasonal /
Overflow Beds
Current & New Current & New Under
Development
Households with Adult(s) and
Child(ren) 0 0 0 0 0
Households with Only Adults 0 0 0 0 0
Chronically Homeless Households 0 0 0 0 0
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied Youth 0 0 0 0 0
Table 35 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 64
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are use to complement services targeted to homeless persons The City of Jurupa Valley does not provide direct services to the homeless; however, the City is in compliance with California Senate Bill 2, which requires the City to identify zones within the City that allow homeless shelters without discretionary review. Additionally, the City’s Housing Element calls for the City to, “actively work with neighboring jurisdictions to achieve regional cooperation to reduce homelessness.” To this end, for each of the last few years, City has funded POLM, a local non-profit, to administer outreach to homeless, provide services to homeless and funded housing crisis stabilization units in the City of Jurupa Valley. In addition, City has used a portion of its ARP HOME funds to expand its homeless services. And, part of the City funding evaluation includes an assessment of the level and quality of service provided by local agencies, including the experience of case managers linking clients with appropriate mainstream services and resources. Examples of mainstream services available for the City’s homeless include veterans housing vouchers, veteran medical services, MediCal, SSI, and CalWORKS. Please refer to Section NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment.

List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.

As indicated in Table 39, there are no homeless shelter beds situated in the City of Jurupa Valley; however, the City funds crisis stabilization units in Jurupa Valley and has established relationships with various local service providers in an effort to link the City’s homeless population with appropriate housing and support services.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 65
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) Introduction
Certain segments of the population experience conditions that make it difficult for them to access affordable housing. Physical or medical conditions, particular space or supportive service requirements, incomes, or other factors may impede a household’s ability to obtain decent and affordable housing.

This section briefly describes the characteristics of the special needs populations in Jurupa Valley.

Special needs groups include, but not limited to, the elderly, persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities, persons with HIV/AID, and domestic violence.

Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs
Elderly/Frail Elderly. According to 2021 ACS data, Jurupa Valley had 10,367 people who were age 65 and over, accounting for 9.7% of the total population. Some of the characteristics of the special needs residents included having limited mobility, increased medical attention due to health complications and restricted fixed income, such as Social Security, pension programs and retirement income. Many elderly people have difficulty completing normal, everyday tasks without assistance. The 2021 ACS data (ACS Table C18108) estimates that 8.1% of the Jurupa Valley’s elderly had one type of disability and 14.8% had two or more disabilities. According to the U.S. Census Bureau classifies disabilities into the following categories:
▪ Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing. ▪ Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses. ▪ Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions.
▪ Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs. ▪ Self-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing. ▪ Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping.

Persons with mental, physical, and/or developmental disabilities. Based on the 2021 ACS S1810 data, the number of Jurupa Valley residents age five and older with some type of disability totaled 7,907, which was 7.4% of the City’s total civilian non-institutionalized population age five and older. The top three disabilities among persons age five and older with disability include those with ambulatory difficulty (4.0%), independent living difficulty (3.4%), and cognitive difficulty (3.5%). Having a disability negatively impacts a person’s ability to work and earn money. Approximately 6,350 persons with disabilities age 18 to 64 in Jurupa Valley had incomes below the federal poverty level.

Persons with alcohol or other drug addiction. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services conducts the annual National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (2018-19) for the 50 states and the CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 66
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
District of Columbia. The survey estimated that approximately 2.9 million California residents or 9% of the state’s 18 years and older population had a substance use disorder. Substance use disorder is defined as meeting criteria for illicit drug or alcohol dependence or abuse. Alcohol dependence or abuse affected 6%, while illicit drug dependence or abuse affected 4% percent of Californians 18 and over.

Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. The California Department of Public Health’s California HIV Surveillance Report for 2020 estimates that there were approximately 10.199 people living with a diagnoses HIV infection in Riverside County. This represents 7.3% of HIV-diagnosed residents statewide in 2020. Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, the persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment. In addition, persons with HIV/AIDS may be targets of hate crimes and discrimination, including illegal eviction from their homes when their illness is exposed.

Victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Victims of domestic violence are typically women and/or youth. Both groups become victims to crimes such as rape, battery or assault. Moreover, those with below moderate-income levels are at greater risk as well. As stated in section NA-10, it is estimated that in California, 54% of women and 31% of men have been victimized by rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner. If these rates are applied to the Jurupa Valley’s population, the resulting estimate would be approximately 52,986 women and 16,563 men residing in the city who have suffered at one point or another from domestic/dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 67
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
One of the programs that can assist persons with mental and physical health issues to receive housing is the SOAR program. The SOAR (SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access and Recovery) Project is designed to expedite access to Social Security Disability benefits for people who are homeless and have serious mental illness and/or co-occurring substance use disorders. With these benefits, people who are homeless or at-risk have a reliable source of income that makes it easier to access housing and supportive services. This can lead to long-term self-sufficiency and recovery, and help to end homelessness for many in the community.

Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e)
The City plans to continue to fund the housing rehabilitation program – that addresses housing needs of persons that have special needs. HUD-funded grant recipients are required under various laws not to discriminate in housing or services directly or indirectly on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, familial status, or disability. Under the Consolidated Plan, HUD funded recipients are required to: (1) examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction; (2) promote fair housing choice for all persons; (3) provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin; (4) promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities; (5) and comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act. The City plans to continue to fund a fair housing service provider to address complaints and violations, including those of special needs residents.

For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) Please refer to the discussion above.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 68
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e)
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment The City has little control over market variables that impact the cost of housing, e.g., cost of land, and cost of construction supplies, materials and labor. The City’s Housing Element has identified governmental constraints that may have a negative impact to creating affordable housing opportunities.

Prevailing Wage Requirements. SB 975, passed in 2002, dramatically expanded the range of projects that require the payment of State prevailing wages. The requirements apply to projects involving almost any sort of public subsidy. Notably, affordable apartment projects that receive federal or state low- income housing tax credits are exempt from State prevailing wage requirements; however, federal prevailing wages may be applicable.

According to the California Association for Local Economic Development, SB 975 has had an overall negative impact on the structure of economic development in California. Some experts estimate federal prevailing wage regulations increase construction costs 10 percent to 30 percent.

Environmental Review. The California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act require environmental review of proposed discretionary projects; e.g., subdivision maps, zone changes, etc. Costs and delays resulting from the environmental review process are added to the cost of developing housing.

Planning and Development Fees. Fees charged by local governments also contribute to the cost of housing. Based on 2020 development applications in the City, development impact fees are in the order of $15,500 per unit for a market-rate single-family home and $12,000 per unit for market-rate multi- family apartment projects, according to the 2021-2029 Housing Element.

Permit and Processing Procedures. The processing time required to obtain approval of development entitlements and building permits is often cited as contributing to construction costs. In development parlance, “time is money” and developers can incur significant holding costs during a delay. Building permit applications for new single-family houses typically take 3 to 6 months to complete the building permit plan check process, sometimes longer depending upon the size of the project. Processing multi- family development applications, which often require general plan amendments, rezoning, and CEQA review, typically requires 6 months to 1 year to complete discretionary planning review. The City's permit procedures expedite planning and building approvals where possible and are not likely to unduly constrain housing development.

Land Use Controls. In terms of land use controls, the General Plan is of paramount concern. This policy document not only establishes the location and amount of land that will be allocated to residential development, but also establishes the intensity of development in terms of unit densities and total number of units, that will be permitted. While nearly all components or elements of the General Plan contain goals and policies that influence residential development, it is the Land Use Element that has the most direct influence. Jurupa Valley’s development standards do not contain any unduly restrictive provisions. Building height, setbacks, lot areas, and parking are generally within the range of other cities CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 69
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
in the State. The City’s processing and permit procedures are consistent with state planning and zoning law and are not considered to be an unreasonable constraint on the cost or supply of housing. The City will consider an amendment to the Zoning Code to eliminate the requirement for discretionary review for multi-family development in multi-family residential zones to expedite permit processing for projects that conform to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance development standards.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 70
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Introduction
According to the 2013-2017 ACS, Jurupa Valley had 48,675 working-age adults in the labor force and an unemployment rate of 10.3%. More recent data from the California Employment Development Department shows that by December 2022, there was an estimated labor force in Jurupa Valley of 51,900, and the unemployment rate has significantly decreased to just 3.1%. This was lower than the 3.7% unemployment rate recorded for all of Riverside County.

Certain employment sectors may have mismatches between the number of jobs and the number of workers available, resulting in high unemployment in those sectors. The Business Activity table below compares the number of workers in each sector as recorded in 2013-2017 ACS data with the number of jobs in the same sector as recorded by the Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program. In the City of Jurupa Valley, the largest shortage of jobs was observed in the Education and Health Care Services sector, with enough jobs for only 2,405 workers out of a number of 5,601 workers. On the other hand, there were almost three times the transportation sector jobs than workers in Jurupa Valley.

Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity
Business by Sector Number of
Workers
Number of Jobs Share of Workers
%
Share of Jobs
%
Jobs less workers
%
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 477 26 1 0 -1 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 4,506 2,191 11 7 -4 Construction 4,330 3,747 11 12 1
Education and Health Care Services 5,601 2,405 14 8 -6
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,614 564 4 2 -2
Information 529 46 1 0 -1
Manufacturing 4,451 3,701 11 12 1
Other Services 1,203 849 3 3 0
Professional, Scientific, Management Services 2,262 493 6 2 -4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 71
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Business by Sector Number of
Workers
Number of Jobs Share of Workers
%
Share of Jobs
%
Jobs less workers
%
Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0
Retail Trade 4,773 2,394 12 8 -4
Transportation and Warehousing 3,662 8,962 9 29 19
Wholesale Trade 2,593 2,561 6 8 2
Total 36,001 27,939 -- -- --
Table 36 - Business Activity
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Workers), 2017 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs)

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 72
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 48,675
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and
over 43,640
Unemployment Rate 10.29
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 25.45
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 6.38
Table 37 - Labor Force
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 5,475
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 2,250
Service 4,420
Sales and office 10,115
Construction, extraction, maintenance and
repair 6,955
Production, transportation and material
moving 4,250
Table 38 – Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Travel Time
Travel Time Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 22,940 57%
30-59 Minutes 10,940 27%
60 or More Minutes 6,570 16%
Total 40,450 100%
Table 39 - Travel Time
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Education:

Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
Less than high school graduate 8,815 860 5,200
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 73
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 10,365 1,210 4,050
Some college or Associate's degree 11,185 940 3,070
Bachelor's degree or higher 4,955 310 935
Table 40 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18–24 yrs 25–34 yrs 35–44 yrs 45–65 yrs 65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 180 1,030 1,915 5,255 1,955
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,760 1,675 2,305 2,695 1,300 High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 4,975 5,365 3,630 6,625 2,490
Some college, no degree 4,380 3,900 3,095 5,215 2,030
Associate's degree 420 970 550 1,535 740
Bachelor's degree 510 1,585 1,100 1,740 650
Graduate or professional degree 4 420 455 915 385
Table 41 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate 24,775
High school graduate (includes equivalency) 30,930
Some college or Associate's degree 35,125
Bachelor's degree 50,480
Graduate or professional degree 65,250
Table 42 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 74
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
With 14 percent of the City’s workers and 8% of the jobs, Education and Health Care Services forms the single largest employment sector in Jurupa Valley. “Manufacturing”, “Construction”, and “Arts and Entertainment” form the second and third largest sectors, with about 11% for each of these categories of the City’s workers.

Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community:

Jurupa Valley’s workforce consists of two primary groups: Approximately 19,000 workers have a high school diploma or less education. And, approximately 16,000 workers have a college degree, or some college education. The lesser educated workforce has higher unemployment rates and lower earnings.

Given the City’s workforce - a key need of the business community of Jurupa Valley is workforce development, which is an economic development strategy aimed at developing a supply of trained employees that in turn can help attract quality industrial and commercial jobs to the area.

Having vibrant industrial and commercial sectors in Jurupa Valley has the beneficial effect of keeping young people in the community and raising the standard of living (wages and benefits) for Jurupa Valley residents.

Higher economic activity would also result in higher revenues to the City of Jurupa Valley, which could then be used to improve the City’s infrastructure and other needs. The City recognizes the need to enhance the unique visual qualities of its commercial areas in the different communities throughout the City and improve infrastructure improvements, as resources allows, per the General Plan.

Jurupa Valley is also working to attract new businesses, given the ideal location of the City to serve surrounding cities. The City is located near major highways and urban centers that serves as a major logistics shipping and receiving center for Southern California. Along with that regional role comes significant commercial truck traffic using highway off-ramps and City streets. This has been part of an important economic stimulus in Jurupa Valley, but has also resulted in significant traffic congestion in certain areas and increased wear and damage to City streets, particularly in areas where logistics and other warehouse and industrial uses are concentrated. Most commercial truck traffic is concentrated in the northwestern and northeastern areas of the City, near the SR 60 corridor.

The efficient movement of goods is vital to Jurupa Valley and also the Inland Empire’s economy and transportation system safety. The ability of Jurupa Valley to compete domestically and internationally on an economic basis requires an efficient and cost-effective method for distributing and receiving products. The City is working to accomplish its economic / transportation goals by proper planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the regional and local street and highway system. The City's industrial and commercial sectors depend on safe and efficient goods movement. Investment in, preservation of and expansion of the existing freeway and street network is critical to the provision of a viable transportation system necessary to sustain a healthy local economy.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 75
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.

Jurupa Valley is a city of 102,205 people, 25,160 households, with a median income of $63,286 (2013- 2017 ACS data) that is characterized by its small-town feeling, natural beauty, and distinctive communities; whose citizens are enjoying a prosperous economy with an unemployment rate of just

3.1% (California Employment Development Department , December 2022). Jurupa Valley’s economy is driven by a younger, largely Hispanic, and blue-collar local population.

Key goals of Jurupa Valley revolve around building and maintaining the current thriving local economy by expanding employment and business opportunities, providing needed products and services, increasing median income and property values, preserving and enhancing Jurupa Valley’s quality of life.

Specifically, City employment is concentrated within transportation, warehousing, retail trade, and manufacturing services. The City performs below average relative to neighboring jurisdictions in terms of taxable retail sales and capture of resident and non-resident spending. Higher performing retail categories include grocery, electronics and appliances, and miscellaneous retail sales, while lower performing retail categories include apparel, restaurants and bars, and sporting goods. Based on these and other findings, the City is exploring the use of alternative economic tools to retain and attract businesses that meet local demand, improve the tax base, and create a potential for public-private cooperation.

How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Please refer to the previous section regarding the education level needs of the Jurupa Valley labor force.

Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.

The Workforce Development Boards (WDBs), community colleges and universities are working to ensure that more of the local workforce is trained so that they can effectively compete for higher paying jobs, and help move residents out of poverty.

Jurupa Valley residents have the resources available from the Riverside County Workforce Development Board (WDB). The WDB provides oversight for the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs in the county. The WDB acts as a catalyst to provide seamless services among various workforce programs, and provides community leadership around workforce issues. There are five key ways that the WDB carries out its role:

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 76
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

• CONVENER - Bring together business, labor, education, and economic development to focus on community workforce issues.
• WORKFORCE ANALYST - Develop, disseminate and understand current labor market and economic information and trends.
• BROKER - Bring together systems to solve common problems, or broker new relationships with businesses and workers.
• COMMUNITY VOICE - Advocate for the importance of workforce policy, providing perspective needs for skilled workers.
• CAPACITY BUILDING - Enhance the region's ability to meet the workforce needs of local employers.

The WD accomplishes these tasks through America's Job Centers of California, better known as the Riverside County Workforce Development Centers (WDCs). The WDCs are the hub of the county-wide service delivery vehicle for workforce, education and business services.

Regarding educational facilities, there are currently no institutions of higher education in Jurupa Valley.

The closest facilities within Riverside County are Norco College, Riverside City College, and the University of California, Riverside. The GPAC stated a strong desire to build a satellite college campus and/or trade school in Jurupa Valley, and to provide other venues offering adult education.

Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)?
No
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.

The General Plan of Jurupa Valley identifies the need of the City to implement a comprehensive economic strategy that would expand its industrial and commercial base that, in turn, would benefit City residents, property owners, and businesses. To enhance the local economy, Jurupa Valley is targeting its efforts on six specific areas of the city. These specific areas are given the designation of “Opportunity Areas” where private commercial and industrial development could significantly and positively affect the City’s fiscal revenue by creating new jobs.

Discussion
The City of Jurupa Valley has approximately 48,675 working-age adults in the labor force that primarily consists of a younger, largely Hispanic, and blue-collar local population. The current unemployment rate is just 3.1%. The largest employment sectors include Education and Health Care Services, Manufacturing CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 77
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
and Arts and Entertainment. The City is planning on implementing an economic strategy that would target six specific areas of the City. In addition, the plans include improving infrastructure improvements, in order to attract new business and retain/help expand current ones.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 78
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
This ConPlan did not include an analysis of areas of concentration of households with multiple housing problems. In general, the lowest-income households have the most problems due to the high cost of housing in relation to income, which can lead to deferred maintenance and other physical issues as well as more immediately cost-related problems such as overpayment and overcrowding. As detailed below, the lowest-income households are concentrated in some of the central and eastern sections of the City, implying a high likelihood that households with the highest cost burden are also experiencing physical problems in older dwellings with more maintenance issues.

Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") Attachment 3 shows maps, which include the locations / concentrations of residents who are Hispanic-- the largest ethnic minority group in Jurupa Valley and other racial / ethnic groups. (Hispanic population in Jurupa Valley is 74.7%, with Black and Asian populations being 5.9% of total.) Hispanic concentration was defined as a census tract with the Hispanic population representing more than 50 percent of total population of the census tract. Hispanic residents generally reside in central and eastern sections of the City. These maps were generated using HUD’s CPD e-GIS mapping tool, which uses the latest ACS and CHAS data.

What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? The main characteristic of Jurupa Valley neighborhoods is single family residential homes. There are areas that are rural, and others that have commercial and industrial concentrations.

Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? After reviewing the neighborhoods and corresponding maps, the following are located in these areas/neighborhoods: City Hall and other public services are located near the central area of the City that has a high concentration of the Hispanic population.

Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? To enhance the local economy, Jurupa Valley is targeting its efforts on six specific areas of the City.

These specific areas are given the designation of “Opportunity Areas” where private commercial and industrial development could significantly and positively affect the City’s fiscal revenue by creating new jobs.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 79
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2)

Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.

Jurupa Valley has allocated $2.5 million to expand access to internet services in rural areas of the City, which is where there are more low-and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. These City outreach actions were consistent with HUD’s new regulation to address the need for broadband access for low- and moderate-income residents.

Cities with rural communities have a need for more broadband services. And, providing a broadband infrastructure has become increasingly important in order to provide residents with reliable connectivity for services such as online banking, and purchasing goods and services. In 2019, according to EdSource, a statewide nonprofit specializing in education-related research and analysis, only about a third of California households in rural areas are subscribed to internet service, compared with 78% in urban areas.

Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.

Jurupa Valley understands the need to have more than one broadband internet service provider and currently has eight broadband service providers available to City residents and has allocated $2.5 million to expand internet services to rural areas of the City. Broadband provides high speed internet access via multiple types of technologies including fiber optics, wireless, cable, DSL and satellite.

According to the FCC, the definition of broadband internet is a minimum of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload speeds. Jurupa Valley has the following eight broadband service providers: AT&T (50Mbps), Spectrum (1,000 Mbps), T Home Internet (182 Mbps), Earthlink (50Mbps), HughesNet (25 Mbps), Viasat (100 Mbps), Ulimitedville (99Mbps) and IspMint (100 Mbps)

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 80
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)

Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.

Air quality is a regional issue which every city and county in the region feels the effects. Jurupa Valley is experiencing increased concentrations of greenhouse gases (CHG), which in turn contribute to warming temperatures, sea level rise, and altered weather patterns that affect rainfall and air quality. And, air quality is a regional issue that affects every city and county in the region. Although Jurupa Valley generates very low emissions, air quality in the region is among the Basin’s worst due to onshore winds transporting vast amounts of pollutants from Los Angeles and Orange counties into the Inland Empire.

Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods.

So, all income levels, including low-and moderate-income household in Jurupa Valley are vulnerable to the risks associated with climate change. The City of Jurupa Valley desires to highlight the importance of air quality by adopting a stand-alone Air Quality Element. This element identifies goals, policies, and programs that are meant to address issues that potentially affect air quality and climate change. Jurupa Valley established the following goals to address air quality / climate change risks:

AQ 1 - Work with regional, sub-regional, and state agencies to protect and improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

AQ 2 - Help protect its residents, and especially senior citizens, youth and other sensitive receptors, from toxic air pollution.

AQ 3 - Work to reduce emissions from stationary and mobile sources.

AQ 4 - Employ measures to improve the jobs/housing balance and reduce commuting time.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 81
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Strategic Plan
SP-05 Overview
Strategic Plan Overview
The Strategic Plan is the centerpiece of the City of Jurupa Valley’s 2023–2028 Consolidated Plan. The Strategic Plan identifies the programs and projects the City will undertake or consider during the five- year Consolidated Plan cycle. In addition to identifying resources, objectives and goals to implement housing and community development activities, the Strategic Plan includes several sub-strategies including the development of institutional structures, coordination with housing and community partners, the reduction of lead based-paint hazards, addressing homeless issues, addressing barriers to affordable housing, and program/project monitoring.

The City’s overall objective for the CDBG program mirrors HUD’s overall objective for the program: to create a viable community by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. To accomplish this objective in Jurupa Valley, the following Consolidated Plan goals have been identified based on the input of residents and other community stakeholders:
• Conserve the existing supply of affordable housing by supporting the provision of federal rental assistance vouchers and certificates administered by the Housing Authority of Riverside County. • Assist with the preservation of the City’s owner-occupied single-family housing stock. • Support housing and services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. • Support community social services benefitting low- and moderate-income persons and those with special needs.
• Provide needed public infrastructure and facility improvements benefitting low- and moderate- income persons and those with special needs.
• Ensure quality, professional administration of federal funds, including the provision of fair housing services to address discriminatory actions that impede access to housing.

All programs and projects are subject to availability of funds and the approval of the City Council.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 82
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1)
Geographic Area
1 Area Name: CDBG Eligible Block Groups
Area Type: Local CDBG-eligible area
Other Target Area Description: NA
HUD Approval Date: Pending
% of Low/ Mod: Pending
Revital Type: NA
Other Revital Description: NA
Identify the neighborhood boundaries for this target area. Boundaries are established by Census Bureau and determined as
CDBG-eligible by HUD
Include specific housing and commercial characteristics of this target area.

NA
How did your consultation and citizen participation
process help you to identify this neighborhood as a target area?
NA
Identify the needs in this target area. NA
What are the opportunities for improvement in this target area?
NA
Are there barriers to improvement in this target area? NA 2 Area Name: Citywide
Area Type: Citywide program or activity
Other Target Area Description: NA
HUD Approval Date: NA
% of Low/ Mod: NA
Revital Type: NA
Other Revital Description: NA
Identify the neighborhood boundaries for this target area. NA Include specific housing and commercial characteristics of this target area.

NA
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 83
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
How did your consultation and citizen participation
process help you to identify this neighborhood as a target area?
NA
Identify the needs in this target area. NA
What are the opportunities for improvement in this target area?
NA
Are there barriers to improvement in this target area? NA Table 43 - Geographic Priority Areas

General Allocation Priorities
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
To determine which activities will receive CDBG funding during the Consolidated Plan cycle of 2023- 2028, the City utilized a simple priority ranking system:
• High Priority: Activities that address a high priority need will be funded by the City during the five-year period provided adequate resources are available. • Low Priority: The City may or may not fund low priority need activities during the five-year period.

In general, CDBG funds will be allocated on a citywide basis for activities that are limited-clientele in nature (i.e., beneficiaries are CDBG-eligible). Other activities such as public improvements may be limited to eligible areas (see map in Attachment 3), except for ADA related improvements which may be carried out on a much wider basis.

The City does not receive HUD Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 84
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)
Priority Needs
1 Priority Need
Name
Public Improvements
Priority Level High
Population Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Areas
Affected
CDBG-Eligible Block Groups
Citywide program or activity
Associated Goals Public Infrastructure Improvements
Public Facility Improvements
Description Installation of new or rehabilitation of existing public infrastructure and public facility improvements
Basis for Relative
Priority
Needs Analysis, City department consultation, and public input. 2 Priority Need
Name
Housing
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Geographic Areas
Affected
Citywide program
Associated Goals Single Family Housing Rehabilitation and housing preservation Description Rehabilitation or preservation of residential properties to address housing and building code deficiencies and deferred property improvements Basis for Relative
Priority
Based on housing needs analysis, housing market analysis, and public input. 3 Priority Need
Name
Public Services
Priority Level High
Population Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Areas
Affected
Citywide program
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 85
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Associated Goals Homeless Services
Public Services
Description Social service programs that provide services to low- and moderate-income residents including homeless and individuals at risk of homelessness Basis for Relative
Priority
Needs Assessment, service providers input, public input. 4 Priority Need
Name
Administration
Priority Level High
Population Other
Geographic Areas
Affected
Citywide program
Associated Goals Fair Housing Services
Program Administration
Description Program oversight and coordination, including fair housing services Basis for Relative
Priority
HUD required
Table 44 – Priority Needs Summary

Narrative (Optional)
Impediments to Fair Housing: HUD-funded grant recipients are required under various laws not to discriminate in housing or services directly or indirectly on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, familial status, or disability. Under the Consolidated Plan, HUD funded recipients are required to: (1) examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction; (2) promote fair housing choices for all persons; (3) provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin; (4) promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities; (5) and comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act. HUD encourages jurisdictions to consult with one another and initiate metropolitan wide area fair housing planning. The Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice is the primary document utilized for this purpose.

Jurupa Valley completed an Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice – covering program years 2019 through 2023. The City will continue to implement the fair housing action plan delineated in the AI, including contracting with a qualified fair housing service provider to address fair housing complaints and violations. Fair housing impediments identified in the AI and action steps are summarized in Attachment 4.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 86
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b)
Influence of Market Conditions

Affordable
Housing Type
Market Characteristics that will influence
the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based
Rental Assistance
(TBRA)
NA – CDBG funds will not be used for this type of activity TBRA for Non-
Homeless Special
Needs
NA – CDBG will not be used for this type of activity
New Unit
Production
CDBG typically cannot be used for this type of activity; however, funds may be used for certain pre-development costs or off-site public improvements. The Needs Assessment and Housing Market Analysis indicate there is a shortage of housing units affordable to lower income households; however, it is not presently envisioned that CDBG funds will be used for this purpose. A substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan may be necessary if future funding is allocated for such an activity.

Rehabilitation Overall, the City’s housing stock is in good condition; however, a significant number of housing units have been identified as substandard. Housing Market analysis data indicates many lower income homeowners are paying a significant amount of their income for housing (housing cost burden and severe housing cost burden). Housing rehabilitation assistance allows these homeowners to address deferred maintenance improvements on their primary residence without increasing the amount of income dedicated to housing.

Acquisition,
including
preservation
Housing Market analysis data indicates that there is a need for additional housing that is affordable to both renter and owner households. It is not presently envisioned that CDBG funds will be used for this purpose; however, this does not preclude the City from utilizing these resources as an incentive to create new housing opportunities. A substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan may be necessary if future CDBG funding is allocated for such an activity.

Table 45 – Influence of Market Conditions

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 87
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction
Ongoing reductions and fluctuations in CDBG funding make it difficult to estimate the amount that will be available over the five-year Consolidated Plan cycle. Housing voucher/certificate resources (via HARC) will be available to carry out activities that support the goals of the Consolidated Plan.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG public
–
federal
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services 1,100,000 0 0 1,100,000 5,500,000

Table 46 - Anticipated Resources

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 88
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied
Other resources that will be available to carry out activities that address the goals of the Consolidated Plan are limited:
• HARC reports that as of December 2022, 340 Jurupa Valley households received rental assistance. It is anticipated that a similar number of households will be assisted annually over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. • Jurupa Valley intends to continue and update an existing Inclusionary Housing Program previously administered by the County of Riverside. This program requires that 1 out of every 25 new units (4%) be reserved for households at the 50% area median income level. Projects of six or more units are required to participate in the program. Affordable units must be provided on-site, off-site, or through the payment of an in-lieu fee.

CDBG does not require matching funds.

If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City conducted a detailed inventory of potential housing sites as part of the 2017 General Plan process. This study evaluated specific parcels, development constraints, and potential development capacity. The analysis indicated that 902 vacant parcels (or 2,432 vacant acres) in the City appear to be developable for housing. Additionally, parts of 73 additional parcels appear to be developable. These parcels, which are classified as Partially Constrained Parcels, include approximately 677 acres of additional land that could be used to accommodate new residential development in the City. A comprehensive list of these parcels is found in the City’s General Plan Appendices.

Discussion
Funding resources to implement the City’s Consolidated Plan are limited. It is anticipated that CDBG funding will continue to be reduced. With respect to other resources, the City will continue to support HARC’s efforts to secure new rental assistance resources. As outlined above, an inventory of vacant land has been developed by the City. Additionally, the City’s Housing Element indicates the City will continue to implement an Inclusionary Housing Program, which will ensure the creation of affordable housing units and/or the accumulation of in-lieu-fees that can be used to assist with the development of affordable housing.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 89
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k)
Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions.

Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role Geographic Area
Served
Housing Authority of
Riverside County
PHA Planning
Public Housing
Rental
Region
Riverside County Continuum of care Homelessness
Planning
Region
Jurupa Valley Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
Fair Housing Council of
Riverside County
Non-profit
organizations
Planning Region
Table 47 - Institutional Delivery Structure

Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Geographically, the City covers an area of 44-square miles, encompassing several established communities and neighborhoods. The City is a mix of high and low-density residential development, rural farming/agricultural activities, and commercial, retail, and industrial land uses. The City has significant capacity for expansion of both residential and commercial development. The City’s Housing Element indicates the City will, “work with public, private and nonprofit housing entities to identify candidate sites for new construction of rental housing for seniors and other special housing needs, and take all actions necessary to expedite processing and approval of such projects.” To this end, an extensive list of parcels that may be suitable for housing development is identified in the City’s General Plan. This cooperative attitude is a strength and opens the door to expanding and building relationships with public, private and nonprofit institutions as a way to build the community.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 90
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Jurupa Valley was incorporated in July 2011. During the past eight years, the City has established its administrative infrastructure but continues to mature as a municipality. During this maturation process, it is not unexpected that several gaps exist in the City’s institutional structure. Throughout the process of developing the City’s Consolidated Plan, it was evident that many organizations and individuals were not familiar with Jurupa Valley as a municipality. Other issues include the isolation of important community data and information for the County. (For example, HUD Block Group low- and moderate- income data is still identified and connected to County data making it difficult to analyze data from systems such as HUD’s CPD Maps.)
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services

Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to People
with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X
Legal Assistance X
Mortgage Assistance
Rental Assistance X X
Utilities Assistance X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X
Mobile Clinics
Other Street Outreach Services X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse
Child Care
Education X
Employment and Employment
Training
X
Healthcare X

HIV/AIDS
Life Skills
Mental Health Counseling X
Transportation X
Other
Other – Fair housing X X
Table 48 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 91
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) The City makes a significant effort to serve the needs of homeless persons. Most of the public service grants each year are allocated to assist homeless persons. Jurupa Valley has contracted with Path of Life Ministries to deliver services to the homeless. Services include street outreach, enrolling individuals with shelter at the POLM Emergency Shelter. Also, POLM places homeless individuals in two Crisis Stabilization housing rental units located within Jurupa Valley city limits. And, homeless individuals were provided with special needs assistance to help them with their unhoused situation. In addition to better meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth – Jurupa Valley allocated additional American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to mitigate housing needs. Approximately $1.2 million will be leveraged to address the ongoing regional housing crisis through affordable housing assistance, services for unhoused individuals and crisis stabilized units and $1 million will be allocated to direct resident assistance programs.

Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above
POLM, under contract to provide Jurupa Valley with homeless services, provides services to special needs population. During the previous fiscal year - 2021-22 - 22 persons (first quarter), 9 persons (second quarter), 3 persons (third quarter) and 7 persons (fourth quarter) – a total of 41 unduplicated individuals with special needs were assisted with services to help them exit their unhoused situation.

With additional funding, the service deliver system will be able to accommodate more persons with special needs.

Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs With clear direction from the City Council and executive management, City staff has built relationships with local and sub-regional service providers. Besides working with local service providers, Jurupa Valley is also working with other nearby cities to address homeless issues that affect Jurupa Valley and the surrounding communities as well. This subregional approach can address various community needs in a more efficient manner and overcome the gaps in the institutional structure and deliver services in a more efficient manner to assist unhoused persons, and those at-risk of being homeless.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 92
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4)
Goals Summary Information
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
1 Public
Infrastructure
Improvements
2023 2028 Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG
census
tracts
Citywide
Public
Improvements
CDBG:
$3,750,000
Public Facility or Infrastructure
Activities for Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit:
15,000 Households Assisted
2 Single Family
Housing
Rehabilitation
2023 2028 Affordable Housing Citywide Housing
Rehabilitation
CDBG:
$520,000
Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated:
40 Household Housing Unit
3 Homeless Services 2023 2028 Homeless Citywide Public Services CDBG:
$700,000
Public service activities other
than Low/Moderate Income
Housing Benefit:
500 Persons Assisted
4 Public Services 2023 2028 Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Public Services CDBG:
$100,000
Public service activities other
than Low/Moderate Income
Housing Benefit:
1,500 Persons Assisted
5 Fair Housing
Services
2023 2028 Administration Citywide Administration CDBG:
$125,000
Other:
1000 Other
6 Program
Administration
2023 2028 Administration Citywide Administration CDBG:
$305,000
Other:
5 Other
Table 49 – Goals Summary

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 93
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Public Infrastructure Improvements
Goal
Description
Improvements to roadways, streets, sidewalks, and other eligible public infrastructure that primarily benefit low- and moderate- income persons.
2 Goal Name Single Family Housing Rehabilitation
Goal
Description
Loans or grants to assist qualified low- and moderate-income homeowners to improve primary residence. 3 Goal Name Homeless Services
Goal
Description
Homeless housing and support services, including homelessness prevention services. 4 Goal Name Public Services
Goal
Description
Support services for low- and moderate-income persons.
5 Goal Name Fair Housing Services
Goal
Description
Services to address impediments to access fair housing. 6 Goal Name Program Administration
Goal
Description
CDBG program oversight and coordination.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 94
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
The City of Jurupa Valley is not a HOME Participating Jurisdiction.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 95
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
The City does own or manage public housing.

Activities to Increase Resident Involvements
Not applicable
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? Not applicable
Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation
Not applicable

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 96
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h)
Barriers to Affordable Housing
The City has little control over market variables that impact the cost of housing, e.g., cost of land, and cost of construction supplies, materials and labor. Though, State law currently requires that cities provide additional aid to housing developers to streamline the process for the development of affordable housing, specifically for the low income, and the very low-income housing categories. To comply with state law, in 2021, Jurupa Valley is in the process of developing a “by right” process for projects in the Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use General Plan designation with a minimum of 10% of units affordable to affordable to lower income households during the 2021-2029 Housing Element planning period to be processed without the need for discretionary review. This law intents to incentivize the development of affordable housing and minimize government constraints on developing affordable housing units in California.

City identified governmental constraints that may have a negative impact to creating affordable housing opportunities.

Environmental Review. The California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act require an environmental review of proposed discretionary projects; e.g., subdivision maps, zone changes, etc. Costs and delays resulting from the environmental review process are added to the cost of developing housing.

Planning and Development Fees. Fees charged by local governments also contribute to the cost of housing. Based on recent development applications in the City, development impact fees are in the order of $15,500 per unit for a market-rate single-family home and $12,000 per unit for market-rate multi-family apartment projects, according to the 2021-2029 Housing Element.

Permit and Processing Procedures. The processing time required to obtain approval of development entitlements and building permits is often cited as contributing to construction costs. In development parlance, “time is money” and developers can incur significant holding costs during a delay. Building permit applications for new single-family houses typically take 3 to 6 months to complete the building permit plan check process, sometimes longer depending upon the size of the project. Processing multi- family development applications, which often require general plan amendments, rezoning, and CEQA review, typically requires 6 months to 1 year to complete discretionary planning review. The City's CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 97
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
permit procedures expedite planning and building approvals where possible and are not likely to unduly constrain housing development.

Land Use Controls. In terms of land use controls, the General Plan is of paramount concern. This policy document not only establishes the location and amount of land that will be allocated to residential development but also establishes the intensity of development in terms of unit densities and the total number of units, that will be permitted. While nearly all components or elements of the General Plan contain goals and policies that influence residential development, it is the Land Use Element that has the most direct influence. Jurupa Valley’s development standards do not contain any unduly restrictive provisions. Building height, setbacks, lot areas, and parking are generally within the range of other cities in the State. The City’s processing and permit procedures are consistent with state planning and zoning law and are not considered to be an unreasonable constraint on the cost or supply of housing. The City will consider an amendment to the Zoning Code to eliminate the requirement for discretionary review for multi-family development in multi-family residential zones to expedite permit processing for projects that conform to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance development standards.

Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing Jurupa Valley prefers to provide incentives than regulations as the means to facilitate the production of housing for all income levels. To encourage the production of lower-cost housing, the City has identified various incentives for property owners and developers to consider. Among these possible incentives are modifications to development standards, reduced development fees, expedited permit processing, and direct financial assistance from in-lieu Inclusionary Housing Program (IHP) fees. Per the City’s Housing Element (2021-2029), creative incentive packages for creative housing solutions are planned to be implemented in FY23/24. One key goal is developing an inclusionary housing ordinance and promote the inclusion of affordable units in every housing project in entitlement beginning in FY22/23. City would target 30% of new affordable housing in higher opportunity areas and 30% in areas of concentrated poverty. And, prioritize funding for infrastructure improvements in the most impacted areas beginning in FY 23/24.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 98
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d)
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
Jurupa Valley has contracted with Path of Life Ministries (POLM), one of the subregions major homeless service provider – to assist persons that have experience assisting both Jurupa Valley and the sub- region’s homeless population. POLM systematically reaches out to Jurupa Valley’s homeless and provides a variety of services to meet their individual needs. The City also contracts with other service providers to provide free meals and other services to the City’s homeless persons. These agencies typically have established outreach and assessment programs that engage the homeless and link them to appropriate housing and services. It is anticipated that the City will continue to utilize CDBG funding during the Consolidated Plan cycle for such services.

Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons As Table 39 indicates, there are no homeless shelters located in the City; however, according to HUD’s 2021 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Housing Inventory Count Report, there are 1,357 emergency shelter beds in the Riverside County Continuum of Care (RC-CoC). Shelter beds are located throughout the county including POLM’s and Operation Safe House, which are situated in adjacent communities.

HUD data also indicates there are 85 transitional shelter beds in the RC-CoC, with 35 beds located in the neighboring City of Riverside. In recent years HUD has encouraged regional continuums of care to move away from traditional transitional housing programs toward rapid rehousing. This housing first approach to housing the homeless provides short-term rental assistance and services, with services ending once rental assistance terminates. The goal is to help homeless households obtain housing quickly, increase self-sufficiency, and remain housed. HUD data reports in 2021 there were 467 rapid rehousing beds throughout the RC-CoC.

Jurupa Valley will continue to utilize CDBG funding during the Consolidated Plan cycle for homeless services and use other funding to address regional homeless issues. Additionally, as a CDBG Entitlement Community, and consistent with the Housing Element, the City will continue to participate in regional efforts to address homelessness.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 99
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Pursuant to current HUD directives, the RC-CoC has established a coordinated entry system whereby a homeless individual or family, seeking shelter and services is directed to a streamlined system that facilitates access to appropriate housing and services. The system screens applicants for eligibility for services, such as homelessness prevention, rapid rehousing, emergency shelter, affordable housing, permanent supportive housing, and other interventions. The needs and strengths of each household are assessed to determine which interventions will be most effective and appropriate, while also prioritizing people for assistance based on the severity of their needs. Most regional service providers participate in the coordinated entry process. Through the system, homeless households are placed in appropriate housing including rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing.

Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs
The City will continue to use CDBG and other resources to support agencies that provide a variety of safety net services aimed at preventing households from becoming homeless. Examples of these services include food banks and rent/utility assistance. It is anticipated that the City will continue to utilize CDBG funding and continue to explore other resources during the Consolidated Plan cycle for such services.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 100
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards – 91.215(i)
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards HUD regulations require a community to test for lead-based paint hazards for all housing units constructed prior to 1978 that are assisted with federal funds. According to data from the Housing Market Analysis, approximately 53.8% of the City’s housing stock was constructed before 1980.

HUD has produced informational material on the dangers of lead-based paint hazards in English and Spanish. The City will ensure these materials are available at public counters at City Hall and posted on the City’s website, to inform and educate residents about the lead poisoning.

If the City establishes a CDBG-funded housing rehabilitation program, program staff will ensure all assisted units are assessed for lead-based paint hazards. If lead hazards are identified, project funding may be allocated to mitigate or remove lead-based paint hazards.

How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? The Housing Market Analysis indicates that a total of 13,550 housing units were built prior to 1980.

Based on national statistics, three-fourths of housing units constructed prior to 1980 contain lead-based paint; accordingly, an estimated 10,162 housing units in the City may contain lead-based paint hazards.

Education is the initial step to mitigating a problem. By providing information regarding lead-based paint hazards, residents can take immediate action to ascertain their risk level and take corrective or preventive action.

Also, the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program addressed the lead paint issue. All homes in the program that were built prior to 1978 get tested for lead. If lead is found, CDBG funds are used to address issues.

How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? Currently, the City addressed the issue by requiring lead-based paint testing on homes that were built prior to 1978. This requirement is integrated in the Rehabilitation Housing Program policies and procedures document. Housing Rehabilitation Program policies and procedures require all properties constructed prior to 1978 to be tested for lead. If lead is found, it will be removed or encapsulated as required by current HUD regulations.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 101
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j)
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 12.9% of the City’s population is living at or below the poverty level. The Census Bureau reports that 12.6% of Jurupa Valley residents age 65 and older are living in poverty as are 17.7% of residents age 18 years and younger.

The City has identified several activities and services that can be implemented to reduce poverty:
• Support rental assistance programs provided by the Housing Authority of Riverside County for very low-income renters, especially senior and disabled households, and households with children.
• Support homeless prevention services for individuals presently housed but at risk of losing their residence. As resources permit, assist those already homeless in need of emergency shelter, transitional housing, rapid rehousing, and permanent supportive housing. • Continue to support public social services that provide a social safety net for lower income individuals.
• Continue to implement the housing rehabilitation program for lower income homeowners, especially senior households.

How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan
The City’s anti-poverty strategy calls for assisting lower income households, especially for seniors, the disabled, and families with children. The support for HARC’s rental assistance programs for very low- income renters is consistent with the City’s affordable housing plan. Additionally, safety net programs (e.g., financial assistance and senior services) will assist households that may be at risk of becoming homeless by allowing them to redirect limited income toward maintaining housing.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 102
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
The City will continue monitoring program to ensure compliance with CDBG program requirements.

Given the recent coronavirus pandemic, it has not been possible to have on site monitoring activities within the past few years.

However, subrecipients are required to submit quarterly accomplishment reports to program staff.

Providers provide information regarding the number of clients served and the overall progress of their programs. Once the coronavirus pandemic is over, or it is once again safe to complete monitoring activities onsite - the City will continue with monitoring activities such as public services. City staff will conduct onsite monitoring to review subrecipient performance, quality of services, and grant administration abilities. If necessary, corrective actions will be recommended by the City to ensure compliance with applicable federal laws and regulations. Monitoring will be conducted annually, but for experienced service providers, the City may conduct onsite visits every other year. Agencies new to CDBG or that have administrative or programmatic issues will be monitored annually until grant management competence is proven.

For public facility and infrastructure improvement, project managers are required to report project status. Performance reports include a list of project milestones, target and actual completion dates, and planned and actual expenditures. Housing rehabilitation program activity will also be required to submit regular program accomplishment reports (quarterly or semi-annually).

All accomplishment report information will be input on a regular basis into IDIS. Year-end accomplishment information will be submitted to HUD as part of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER).

With respect to minority and women-owned businesses, the City will solicit the interest of a wide variety of companies and firms to undertake HUD-funded activities including minority and women-owned businesses.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 103
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
Ongoing reductions and fluctuations in CDBG funding make it difficult to estimate the amount that will be available over the five-year Consolidated Plan cycle. Housing voucher/certificate resources (via HARC) will be available to carry out activities that support the goals of the Consolidated Plan.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG public
-
federal
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services 1,100,000 0 0 1,100,000 5,500,000
Annual CDBG allocation
Table 50 - Expected Resources – Priority Table

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 104
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied
Other resources that will be available to carry out activities that address the goals of the Consolidated Plan are limited:
• HARC reports that as of January 2023, 340 Jurupa Valley households received rental assistance. It is anticipated that a similar number of households will be assisted annually over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. • Currently, the City does not have an adopted inclusionary housing requirement. Rather, the City requires developers to pay the City's inclusionary housing fee to ensure that affordable housing is constructed pursuant to the City's code.

CDBG does not require matching funds.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 105
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan No publicly land or property is currently available for housing. Though, the Jurupa Valley General Plan, Housing Element, 2021-2029, Appendix A contains an extensive list of parcels that may be suitable for housing development. The inventory includes an evaluation of development constraints and potential development capacity for each parcel. Combined with the incentives identified in the Housing Element (see Section SP-55), there exists a potential for the development of several affordable housing units during the Consolidated Plan cycle; however, no specific projects are identified for FY 2023-2024.

Discussion
Funding resources to implement the City’s Consolidated Plan are limited. It is anticipated that CDBG funding will continue to be reduced. With respect to other resources, the City will continue to support RCHA’s efforts to secure new rental assistance resources. Finally, an inventory of vacant and underutilized land has been developed. Combined with affordable housing development incentives, it is possible that new affordable housing opportunities will be developed during the Consolidated Plan cycle; however, no specific projects are identified for FY 2023-2024.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 106
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Annual Goals and Objectives

AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives
Goals Summary Information
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Public
Infrastructure
Improvements
2023 2024 Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG
Eligible
Block
Groups
Public
Improvements
CDBG: $735,000 Public Facility
or
Infrastructure
Activities
other than
Low/Moderate
Income
Housing
Benefit: 2,175
Persons
Assisted
2 Single Family
Housing
Rehabilitation
2023 2024 Affordable
Housing
Citywide Housing
Rehabilitation
CDBG: $104,000 Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated:
8 Household
Housing Units
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 107
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
3 Homeless
Services
2023 2024 Public Services Citywide Homeless
Services
CDBG: $143,759 Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income
Housing
Benefit: 100
Persons
Assisted
(Outreach)
Homeless
Person
Overnight
Shelter: 50
(Emergency
Shelter)
4 Public Services 2023 2024 Public Services Citywide Public Services CDBG: $20,000 Public service activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income
Housing
Benefit: 200
Persons
Assisted
5 Fair Housing
Services
2023 2024 Administration Citywide Administration CDBG: $25,000 Other: 200 6 Program
Administration
2023 2024 Administration Citywide Administration CDBG: $63,969 Other: 1 Other

Table 51 – Goals Summary

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 108
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Public Infrastructure Improvements
Goal
Description
Improvements to roadways, streets, sidewalks, and other eligible public infrastructure that primarily benefit low- and moderate- income persons.
2 Goal Name Single-Family Housing Rehabilitation
Goal
Description
Rehabilitation or preservation of residential properties to address housing and building code deficiencies and deferred property improvements
3 Goal Name Homeless Services
Goal
Description
Homeless housing and support services, including homelessness prevention services 4 Goal Name Public Services
Goal
Description
Social service programs that provide support services to low- and moderate- income residents 5 Goal Name Fair Housing Services
Goal
Description
Services to address impediments to access fair housing
6 Goal Name Program Administration
Goal
Description
CDBG program oversight and coordination.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 109
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Projects
AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d)
Introduction
The following activities have been allocated CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

Projects
# Project Name
1 Glen Avon Area Pavement Rehabilitation
2 CDBG Housing Rehab Grants Program
3 Housing Rehabilitation Administration
4 Path of Life
5 Family Services Association
6 Fair Housing Council of Riverside County
7 CDBG Program Administration

Table 52 – Project Information

Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
FY 2023-2024 is the sixth year the City will administer CDBG funds on its own. As a Cooperating City in the CDBG Urban County Program, the City worked with Riverside County staff to implement several Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) related projects, public facility improvement projects, and public services. The City will continue to utilize CDBG funds to construct street and sidewalk improvements to improve accessibility and mobility for individuals with disabilities and to improve neighborhoods within the CDBG eligible Census Tract Block Groups.

In addition to funding services to address the needs of the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless, public service grants funding in 2023-2024 includes funding for senior services, youth services, and services for disabled persons. Fair housing services will provide residents, landlords, and property managers with information and knowledge regarding fair housing laws with the goal of reducing or eliminating housing discrimination. This program will benefit all Jurupa Valley residents including protected classes such as individuals with disabilities and families with children. Finally, as indicated in the Consolidated Plan, the City will implement a housing rehabilitation program for qualified low- and moderate- income homeowners.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 110
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information

Project Summary Information
1 Project Name Glen Avon Area Pavement Rehabilitation
Target Area CDBG-Eligible Block Groups
Goals Supported Public Infrastructure Improvements
Needs Addressed Public Improvements
Funding CDBG: $735,000
Description This project includes the rehabilitation of existing AC pavement by grind/overlay with isolated removal and reconstruction while also upgrading existing ADA facilities in the disadvantaged neighborhood of Glen Avon.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
4,960 residents of which 3,005 are low- and moderate- income (60.58% Low/Mod)
Location Description The project is primarily located along Campbell St., Ben Nevis Blvd., Avon St. and Mission Blvd.

Census Tract: 040502, Block Group: 2 and
Census Tract: 040501, Block Group: 1
Planned Activities Enhance ADA accessibility and improve roadway safety by fixing poor pavement conditions and installing/upgrading ADA facilities. 2 Project Name CDBG Housing Rehab Grants Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Single Family Housing Rehabilitation
Needs Addressed Housing Rehabilitation
Funding CDBG: $80,000
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 111
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Description Rehab Program: CDBG-funded grants for qualified homeowners to undertake home improvements to address code deficiencies and deferred property improvements
Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families that
will benefit from the proposed activities
8 lower-income homeowners
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities Grants of up to $10,000 to improve owner-occupied housing units. 3 Project Name Housing Rehabilitation Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Single Family Housing Rehabilitation
Needs Addressed Housing Rehabilitation
Funding CDBG: $24,000
Description Funding for direct cost associated with the administration of the City's housing rehabilitation grant program
Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
8 lower income homeowners
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities Costs associated with the administration of the City’s housing rehabilitation grant program. Tasks include qualifying property owners, inspecting properties for eligible home improvements, developing costs estimates, assisting homeowners with contractor agreement, and monitoring construction.
4 Project Name Path of Life
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Homeless Services
Needs Addressed Public Services
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 112
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Funding CDBG: $143,759
Description Homelessness prevention, outreach, emergency shelter and support services.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
125 (75 individuals-outreach and 50 individuals-emergency shelter) Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities Homeless outreach and engagement in order to link individuals to housing and support services. Funding also allocated to provide direct financial assistance to prevent the loss of housing and to assist those already homeless.
5 Project Name Family Services Association
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Social service programs that provide support services to low- and moderate- income residents
Needs Addressed Public Services
Funding CDBG: $20,000
Description Congregate meal program for seniors offered at the senior center Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
200 seniors
Location Description Program offered citywide but will be provided at the Eddie D. Smith Senior Center located at 5888 Mission Blvd.

Planned Activities Congregate meal program for seniors
6 Project Name Fair Housing Council of Riverside County Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Fair Housing Services
Needs Addressed Administration
CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 113
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Funding CDBG: $25,000
Description Fair housing outreach, education and enforcement services with the goal to reduce and eliminate impediments to the fair access of housing.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
200 households
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities Fair housing outreach, education and enforcement services including; landlord, tenant and property management fair housing training; community outreach and education; complaint investigation and enforcement services.
7 Project Name CDBG Program Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Program Administration
Needs Addressed Administration
Funding CDBG: $63,969
Description CDBG program oversight and coordination.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed activities
Not applicable
Location Description 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA – City Hall Planned Activities Program oversight and coordination including management of public service grants, housing and commercial rehabilitation programs, and preparation of required applications and reports.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 114
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed Approximately 91% of planned CDBG-expenditures during FY 2023-2024 will be available on a citywide basis. These activities include housing rehabilitation, homeless services, public services, fair housing services, and program administration. Public infrastructure improvements slated for funding are eligible due to the percentage of low- and moderate- income residents residing in the project's service area. A map of the City's CDBG Eligible Areas is provided as Attachment 3.

Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
CDBG-Eligible Block Groups 91%
Citywide 9%
Table 53 - Geographic Distribution

Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The City's primary intent is to serve lower-income residents that need housing/services regardless of where they live within the City. Area-wide activities (e.g., infrastructure improvements) are limited to the City's CDBG-eligible areas, except for ADA in certain cases.

Discussion
As indicated above, CDBG funds will be allocated to programs that serve Jurupa Valley residents regardless of where they live.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 115
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Affordable Housing
AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g)
Introduction
The City will utilize limited CDBG funds to provide housing rehabilitation grants to eligible homeowners.

One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0
Non-Homeless 8
Special-Needs 0
Total 8
Table 54 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement

One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0
The Production of New Units 0
Rehab of Existing Units 8
Acquisition of Existing Units 0
Total 8
Table 55 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type

Discussion
During FY 2023-2025, the City will implement the fifth year of its Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation Grant program. The City will use CDBG funds to assist an estimated eight households with this activity.

The City will also continue to support HARC's implementation of the federal rental assistance voucher and certificate program. An estimated 365 Jurupa Valley households will benefit from this program during FY 2024-2024.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 116
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h)
Introduction
The City does not own or manage public housing.

Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing Not applicable.

Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
Not applicable.

If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance
Not applicable.

Discussion
The City does not own or manage public housing.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 117
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) Introduction
As outlined above, the City will utilize a portion of CDBG funds during FY 2023-2024 to support agencies that provide homeless services.

Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City will utilize CDBG funds to fund homeless outreach services specifically targeting chronic homeless individuals. These services will be provided by Path of Life Ministries, which will utilize its mobile outreach team to connect with 75 homeless individuals and provide a variety of services and referrals designed to meet basic needs and emergency shelter. This outreach staff will also conduct vulnerability assessments to determine if homeless individuals are ready to enter rapid rehousing or permanent supportive housing.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons There are no emergency or transitional housing beds in Jurupa Valley; however, during FY 2023-2024, the City will partner with Path of Life which will provide a minimum of four shelter beds (1,000 bed nights) for Jurupa Valley homeless individuals on any given night. An estimated 50 individuals will benefit from these services.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
HUD's 2022 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Housing Inventory Count Report indicates there are 1,506 permanent supportive housing beds throughout the Riverside County Continuum of Care. Most beds (824) are tied to the Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) rental housing voucher program that is administered by the HARC. As of January, 2023, HARC reports 340 Jurupa Valley households currently receive rental assistance, including 19 Jurupa Valley veteran households receive rental assistance (44 veterans are on the rental assistance waitlist). HARC also reports that 691 self-reported homeless individuals with ties to Jurupa Valley are on the waitlist for federal rental assistance. The City will continue to support HARC and its efforts to secure additional VASH vouchers, Shelter Plus Care vouchers, and rental assistance vouchers and certificates in an effort to address the needs of these homeless individuals and households.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 118
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
According to HUD's Strategies for Preventing Homelessness, "Homelessness prevention is an essential element of any effort to end homelessness either locally or nationwide." This HUD report indicates it is less expensive and disruptive to keep a household housed-in-place. To this end, the City will allocate CDBG funds to Path of Life to support their homelessness prevention program. The City will also participate in regional homeless planning efforts, including the RC-CoC's Discharge Plan, which aims to prevent individuals leaving institutions, hospitals, etc., from becoming homeless.

Discussion
The City's homeless strategy is to help prevent homelessness and to support local service providers as they engage and assess the needs of the City's homeless population. Significant CDBG funding is allocated to Path of Life Ministries to provide an array of homeless services, including outreach, engagement, short-term shelter, and support services.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 119
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.220(j)
Barriers to affordable housing and actions to overcome barriers are listed in the City's Housing Element and were outlined in the Consolidated Plan – a summary is provided below.

Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment
The Jurupa Valley Housing Element (2021-2029), certified by the state in April 2022, identifies actions the City has planned to reduce barriers to the development of affordable housing. To encourage lower- cost housing production, the City has identified various incentives to consider for property owners and developers. Among these possible incentives are modifications to development standards, reduced development fees, expedited permit processing, and direct financial assistance from in-lieu Inclusionary Housing Program (IHP) fees. In addition, the City has established a goal to create incentives to encourage creative housing solutions such as single room occupancy dwellings, tiny homes and other emerging housing products targeted to homeless persons, seniors, persons with disabilities and other low-income persons. No projects are currently underway that are utilizing these incentives.

Discussion:

The City's Housing Element and Consolidated Plan identify several barriers to the creation of affordable housing opportunities. The Housing Element has also identified several actions the City can take to reduce the impact of these barriers on affordable housing development; however, no projects are currently under development that are using these incentives. In August 2022, the City adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that requires that a minimum of 7% of the units within a project be affordable to lower income households for at least 55 years for rental units and 45 years for for-sale units. The ordinance describes alternative compliance methods that allow developers to comply by paying an in-lieu fee, constructing units off-site, dedicating land, converting market-rate units to affordable, preserving at-risk housing, increasing affordability levels, and other alternatives.

Regarding Affordable Housing Underway: there are two that have submitted applications; however, they are not under construction and are still assembling financing. Two projects expected by the County (major funder) projected to be completed in 2025. So probably, shouldn’t include those this year.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 120
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k)
Introduction:

Outlined below are the actions the City will implement during FY 2023-2024 to address the sub- strategies of the Consolidated Plan.

Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs During FY 2023-2024, the City will encourage and support HARC's efforts to obtain additional rental assistance funding, especially for senior, disabled, and low-income households. CDBG-funded public facility improvements will improve residential neighborhoods with the rehabilitation or installation of streets and sidewalks. Additionally, funding will be allocated to support meal services for seniors.

Finally, fair housing services will help ensure all households can secure safe and decent housing that they desire and can afford, without regard to their race, color, religion, gender, national origin, familial status, disability, age, source of income or other characteristics protected by laws.

Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing As previously outlined, the City will utilize CDBG funds to continue its homeowner housing rehabilitation grant program during FY 2023-2024. The City will also continue to support HARC's administration of HUD's voucher and certificate rental assistance program.

Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
A significant percentage of the City's housing stock was constructed before 1980 and may contain lead- based paint hazards. The City will ensure that information is available to community residents regarding the health impacts of lead-based hazards, especially for young children. As the City implements its housing rehabilitation program, it will ensure that HUD's regulations regarding lead-based paint hazards are incorporated into program policies and procedures to ensure lead-paint hazards are addressed during the property rehabilitation.

Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families According to the U. S. Census Bureau, approximately 12.9% of the City's population lives at or below the poverty level, including 17.7% of children under 18 and 12.6% of seniors (age 65 and older). During FY 2023-2024, the City will support several activities that aim to reduce the number of households living in poverty:
• Support HARC's administration of rental assistance programs for very low-income renters. • Support social service programs that assist households at risk of becoming homeless and those that are homeless.
• Funding for free/low-cost meal services for seniors.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 121
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
• Support fair housing services to ensure households have access to safe and decent housing free of discrimination.
• Provide rehabilitation grants to qualified home owners.

Actions planned to develop institutional structure
As the City prepared to become a CDBG grantee community in 2018, it initiated efforts to develop an institutional structure to help identify and access resources to improve the community. The City solicited the input of local service providers by hosting a community workshop to discuss community needs and future funding opportunities. The City will continue to assist the HARC to implement its Five-year Public Housing Authority (PHA) Plan for the provision of rental assistance vouchers and certificates. The City will also engage neighboring HUD-grantee communities to explore and participate in regional planning and program initiatives.

Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
The City of Jurupa Valley does not operate public housing. HARC provides rental assistance in the community. Federal legislation requires that the Housing Authority prepare five-year and one-year plans that highlight its mission, goals, and objectives related to public and assisted housing programs. The City will review the Authority's plans and will provide HARC the opportunity to review and consult with the City regarding its Consolidated Plan. The goal of this cross-consultation is to provide consistent and coordinated housing services for City residents.

As stated above, Jurupa Valley has developed working relationships with several local nonprofits. As the City expands its CDBG program to provide public service grant funding, it will coordinate efforts with nonprofit partners to promote the efficient and effective use of limited public resources.

Discussion:

Prior to 2018, the City was part of the Riverside Urban County CDBG program. As a participating jurisdiction, the County's Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing incorporated the City. In 2019, the City of Jurupa Valley completed an AI, which is summarized in Attachment 4. Action steps to be taken by the City during FY 2023-2024 to address identified impediments are also found in Attachment 4.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 122
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4)
Introduction:

Each HUD program that is covered by the Consolidated Plan regulations must address certain program- specific requirements. Below are the requirements for the CDBG program as prescribed by the Consolidated Plan template.

Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.

1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0

2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0

3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0

4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0

5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0

Other CDBG Requirements

1. The amount of urgent need activities 0

2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.0%

Discussion:

The City will meet the overall 70% benefit for low- and moderate-income requirement during the one- year 2023 Program Year.

CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT, 4-6-2023
Consolidated Plan JURUPA VALLEY 123
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) - DRAFT

Appendix - Alternate/Local Data Sources

1 Data Source Name
2022 Riverside County Point-In-Time Homeless Count
List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set.

County of Riverside and participating communities
Provide a brief summary of the data set.

Annual point-in-time regional homeless count
What was the purpose for developing this data set?
Homeless count
How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population?
Regional homeless count utilizing HUD-acceptable methodology What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? January 2022
What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Summary data complete.

City of Jurupa Valley
Citizen Participation Plan

City Manager’s Department
8930 Limonite Ave
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
(951) 332-6464

March 19, 2023

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 1

City of Jurupa Valley
Citizen Participation Plan

Contents

Section Page

Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2

Background .......................................................................................................................................... 4

Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 6

Public Participation ............................................................................................................................ 11

1. Citizen Participation Plan and Amendments ........................................................................ 11

2. Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plan .................................................................... 11

3. Substantial Amendments to the Consolidated Plan
and the Annual Action Plan ................................................................................................ 12

4. Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) ........................................... 13

5. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and Amendments (AI) ............................. 14

Funding of Public Services ................................................................................................................. 16

Plans to Minimize Displacement of Persons and Assist any Persons Displaced ............................... 17

Citizen Participation Summary .......................................................................................................... 18

Addendum ......................................................................................................................................... 18

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 2

Introduction

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires entitlement communities (jurisdictions with populations above 50,000) under the federal Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended , to develop a citizen participation plan. Th is Citizen Participation Plan describes how the City of Jurupa Valley (hereafter “the City”) will involve residents in the planning, implementation and assessment of how Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) , HOME Investment Partnership s (HOME) and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funds will be used. Presently, the City of Jurupa Valley only receives CDBG funding directly from HUD. HOME and ESG resources are potentially available through the County of Riverside and/or the State of California.

Regulations governing the preparation and content of the Citizen Participation Plan can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations (24 CFR 91.105). The primary goal of this Citizen Participation Plan is to “set forth the jurisdiction’s policies and procedures for citizen participation.” Specifically, the plan must provide and encourage all citizens of the community to participate in development of:
• The Assessment to Fair Housing (AFH) and any revisions to the AFH • The Consolidated Plan and subsequent Annual Action Plans, and any substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan and/or Annual Action Plans • The year-end performance report also known as the Consolidated Annual Perfomance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)

The Plan sets forth polic ies and procedures for citizen participation, which are designed to maximize the opportunity for citizen participation in the community development process.

Special emphasis has been placed on encouraging participation by persons of low - and moderate-incomes1, residents of predominantly low income areas 2, and residents of areas where community development funds are utilized.

The Citizen Participation Plan must outline actions to be taken by the City to encourage the participation of all its citizens, including minorities and non-English speaking persons and persons with disabilities. Additionally, the plan should encourage the participation of local and regional institutions including the following:
• The Riverside County Continuum of Care
• Businesses, developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community-based and faith-based organizations

1 Low- and moderate-income means household with an annual income less than 80 percent of the area median income, as established by HUD.
2 A prediminately low income area is an area where 51% or more of the residents are low - and-moderate income, as described above.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 3

• Broadband internet service providers and/or other organizations engaged in narrowing the digital divide
• Agencies whose primary responsibilities include the management of flood prone areas, public land or water resources
• Emergency management agencies
• Public housing agencies, including residents of public and assisted housing developments (e.g., resident advisory boards, resident councils, and resident management corporations)

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 4

Background

The Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) is a five-year plan required by HUD that outlines how the City intends to meet identified local housing and community development needs over the five -year period. It is a plan and a process for defining and carrying out a unified vision for housing, homelessness, special needs populations and community economic devel opment needs. The main components of the ConPlan include a housing and community development needs assessment; a housing market analysis; a strategy that reflects general goal s (priorities) and performance outcome measurements for allocating HUD funds to a ddress the housing and community development needs; a list of specific objectives for each priority (including proposed accomplishments); and an annual action plan (one-year funding) describing how federal and local resources will be used to address the needs and objectives identified in the ConPlan.

The City’s ConPlan identifies unmet priorities in the community that generally deal with a suitable living environment, affordable ho using, economic opportunities and homelessness. All future requests for HUD funding through the City of Jurupa Valley beginning in 2018 must be identified by the ConPlan as a need and be part of the strategic objectives for each goal/priority in order to be considered for funding from the City. This includes request s from outside agencies that are directly applying to the City for funding of their activities.

The ConPlan planning and approval process can be broken down into the following stages:
• Needs assessment
• Plan development
• Approval
• Amendments (if necessary)
• Performance review

The City of Jurupa Valley will make reasonable efforts to provide for citizen participation during the community development process and throughout the planning, implementation and assessment of all HUD programs undertaken by the City. City staff will make every effort to involve citizens in all phases of the development, implementation and assessment of community development programs including, but not limited to, the following phases:
a. Identification and assessment of housing and community development needs; determination of CDBG project(s) (ConPlan and Annual Action Plan); b. Changes and/or amendments to approved CDBG projects; and c. Assessment of CDBG program performance (CAPER).

All phases of the community development process will be conducted by City staff in an open manner. Ci tizens of Jurupa Valley are encouraged to participate at all levels and will be given access to program information during each phase of any HUD program as outlined herein.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 5

This citizen participation process generally includes a series of well -publicized annual community/neighborhood meetings and public hearings to review the ConPlan, the Annual Action Plan and the CAPER. All meetings and hearings are publicized in accordance with applicable HUD, state and local regulations. Public notices for environmental procedures and project-related policies are also part of the citizen participation process.

In addition to hosting community meetings and public hearings , and conducted a web -based community needs assessment survey . Pursuant to HUD regulations, the City will also explore alternative public involvement techniques and quantitative ways to measure efforts that encourage citizen participation e.g., use of focus groups and the Internet.

Per direction from HUD, provided to CDBG grant recipients on March 16, 2020, during their “National Briefing on Community Development Block Grant Support for Infectious Disease Response” – the City of Jurupa Valley will consider undertaking “virtual” public hearings (alone, or in concert with an in -person hearing) allowing questions in r eal time, with answers coming directly from the elected representatives to all “attendees” during times of emergencies, such as the coronavirus or COVID -19 pandemic. Jurupa Valley will select a virtual hearing method or platform that will provide for acces sibility for persons with disabilities and LEP to participate.

Jurupa Valley will document these e fforts and provide descriptions to HUD in the subject documents. The Citizen Participation Plan was amended to include these new outreach procedures, recommended by HUD.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 6

Overview

GOAL: To generate significant public participation in the consolidated planning process, including any amendments to the ConPlan, the Annual Action Plan, the AFH, and the CAPER.

Input will be sought particularly from low- and moderate-income persons and groups residing within various areas of the City where program funds will be used.

Objective A: All persons, including those of low - and moderate-income, shall have the opportunity to take part in the consolidated planning process and any amendments to the ConPlan, the Annual Action Plan, the AFH, and the CAPER.

Policies:
1) The consolidated planning process and any amendments to the ConPlan, Annual Action Plan, AFH, and CAPER are designed to promote participation by low - and moderate- income citizens, as well as residents of CDBG project areas. Jurupa Valley staff may take additional steps to further promote participation by such groups, or to target program information to these persons should staff feel that such persons may otherwise be excluded or should additional action be deemed necessary. Activities to promote additional participation may include: posting of notices in neighborhoods and in places frequented by low- and moderate-income persons, and holding community meetings in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods or areas of existing or proposed CDBG project activities.
2) Regarding n on-English speaking persons , City will provide translation services and materials on an as needed basis.
3) The locations of all community meetings as described in this Citizen Participation Plan shall be made accessible to persons with disabil ities. The City of Jurupa Valley shall provide a sign language interpreter whenever City staff is notified five days in advance that one or more deaf persons will be in attendance. The City of Jurupa Valley shall provide a qualified reader whenever City staff is notified five days in advance that one or more visually impaired persons will be in attendance. Additionally, the City of Jurupa Valley shall provide reasonable accommodations whenever City staff is notified five days in advance that one or more persons with mobility or developmental disabilities will be in attendance.
4) One public input meeting will be held prior to those years when a ConPlan is being prepared. At those meetings, members of the public will be asked to identify community needs and priorities prior to the drafting of the ConPlan. 5) Upon completion of the draft ConPlan, the plan will be available for public review and comment for 30 days. Copies of said plan shall be made available to the public at the City offices, at the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 7

Web site (see Addendum). The ConPlan will also be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request.
6) Upon completion of the draft Annual Action Plan , the plan shall be made available for public review and comment for 30 days. Copies of said plan shall be made available to the public at the City offices, at the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum). The draft Annual Action plan will also be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request. 7) Upon completion of the draft AFH, the plan shall be made available for public review and comment for 30 days. Copies of said plan shall be made available to the public at the City offices, at the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum). The draft AFH will also be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request.
8) Upon any substantial changes requiring an amendment to the ConPlan , Annual Action Plan, and/or AFH, the amendment shall be made available for public review and comment for 30 days. Copies of said amendment shall be made available to the public at the City offices, at the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum). Any amendments to said plans will also be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request. 9) Upon completion of the draft CAPER, the report will be available for public review and comment for 15 days. Copies of said report shall be made available to the public at the City offices, at the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum), and will also be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request.
10) Two separate public meetings at different times in each program year shall be conducted by the City to obtain c ommunity views and to respond to proposals and questions. The primary purpose of this first public meeting shall be to assess community needs and problems in an effort to determine the most critical needs to be addressed by the ConPlan and/or the Annual Action Plan; and also to present for public comment and review the program activities which have been select ed by the City of Jurupa Valley to resolve the identified needs.

The second public meeting will be held prior to the submission of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The purpose of this public meeting is to assess how fun ds were spent during the previous program year and assess the performance of the City of Jurupa Valley in resolving identified community development and housing needs, and in achieving its community development goals and objectives. 11) Public hearings and/or meetings shall be conducted at times and locations which will be convenient and accessible to all citizens, especially persons of low- and moderate-income, residents of areas where CDBG projects are proposed or on-going. Virtual public hearings may be undertaken during emergencies, as recommended by HUD.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 8

12) The City shall provide interpreters for non -English-speaking persons and/or the hearing impaired when such requests are made at least five working days prior to the meeting.

Objective B: Adequate program information shall be provided to all interested persons and groups upon request.

Policies:

1) Prior to adoption of the ConPlan, AFH, or Annual Action Plan, the City shall make available to all interested persons and groups the amount of assistance the City expects to receive in CDBG funding. With respect to the ConPlan and the Annual Action Plan , the City shall identify the range of activities that must be underta ken with these fund s, plans to minimize the displacement of persons and plans to assist displaced persons, even if no displacement is expected to occur.
2) The City shall provide all interested persons and groups with reasonable and timely access to all information relating to the City’s proposed ConPlan and the City’s use of assistance under the relevant programs during the previous five years. 3) The City will provide reasonable and timely access to information and records to members of the community, public agencies, and other interested parties relating to the City's AFH, ConPlan, and use of assistance under the CDBG program during the preceding 5 years.

Records and materials to be made available include, but are not necessarily limited to: the records of public hearings (if meetings are recorded); mailings and promotional materials; prior CDBG program applications; letters of approval; grant agreements; the environmental review record; financial and procurement records; project design and construction specifications; labor standards materials; performance and evaluation reports; other reports required by HUD; proposed and approved CDBG program application(s) for the current year or project; written comments or complaints received concerning the community development program, and written responses from the City of Jurupa Valley ; and, copies of the applicable Federal and State rules, regulations, policies, requirements and procedures governing the CDBG program. Requests for information and records must comply with the City’s established request for public records process, which may include a fee for copies. Reasonable accommodations for information in oral, Braille, electronic, or large print (for the visually impaired) for disabled persons, or hand delivered copies to persons that are homebound will be considered. 4) In no case shall the City of Jurupa Valley disclose any information concerning the financial status of any program participant(s) which may be required to document program eligibility or benefit. Furthermore, the City of Jurupa Valley shall not disclose any information which may, in the opinion of the Community Development Director , be deemed of a confidential nature.

Objective C: The City shall provide adequate advance public notice of all associated meetings and hearings.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 9

Policies:

1) The City shall provide adequate advance notice of all public hearings and meetings to all interested persons and groups. Sufficient information shall be published about the subject of the hearing or meeting, including but not limited to, the time, date, place and topics and procedures to be discussed to permit public input. Such notice shall take the form of a public notice in the Press Enterprise newspaper, standard City posting places, such as: online outreach via the City’s Web site; message boards around City Hall, and/or individual letters, notices or flyers mailed to interested persons and groups. Although HUD does not specify the length of notice required, a minimum of two weeks is considered adequate.
2) Public hearings will be held during all phases of the community development process, as outlined herein, to allow citizens to voice opinions and offer proposals concerning the development and performance of the CDBG program. City staff will respond to questions and proposals from citizens at each public hearing. Any questions that citizens may have concerning a program will be answered and their comments, suggestions, and/or proposals will be received. Citizens may also express comments and views concern ing the community development process or any specific project to the governing body at any regularly scheduled meeting. A summary of comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why, shall be attached to the ConPlan, AFH, Annual Action Plan, substantial amendment, or CAPER (as applicable).

Objective D: The City shall furnish technical assistance to all interested persons and groups requesting such assistance.

Policies:

1) The City shall provide technical assistance upon request , particularly to groups or individuals representing persons with low- and moderate-income. The City shall determine the necessary level and degree of assistance. Such technical assistance might include the following:
• Assisting low- and moderate-persons to develop statements of view, identify their needs, and to develop activities and proposals for projects, which when implemented, will resolve those needs.
• Explaining the process for submitting proposals.
• Interpreting program rules, regulations, and procedures and/or federal and local requirements.
• Providing comments and advice on the telephone or in meetings. • Reviewing and commenting on draft proposals.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 10

It is important to note that the provision of technical assistance does not guarantee or include the provision of funds.

Objective E: All comments, objections, and complaints submitted by interested persons or groups shall be adequately considered and addressed.

Policies:

1) The City shall consider any comments or complaints from interested persons or groups received in writing or orally at public hearings or meeting s in preparing the ConPlan, the Annual Action Plan, the AFH, any amendments to the former plans, and/or the CAPER. 2) A summary of public comments or complaints and a summary of any comments or complaints not accepted and the reasons thereto shall be attached to the respective final ConPlan, any amendments to the plan, the Annual Action Plan and/or the CAPER. 3) The City shall provide a substantive written response to every comment or complaint received within 15 working days when possible.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 11

Public Participation

1. Citizen Participation Plan and Amendments

The Citizen Participation Plan is designed to facilitate and encourage residents to participate in the ConPlan process. In particular, the Citizen Participation Plan seeks to encourage the involvement of low- and moderate-income persons.

The City will use the following process to adopt and make any subsequent changes to its Citizen Participation Plan:
• The City will place its public notices in Press Enterprise newspaper, at the Community Development office and the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum) in advance of a 30-day public review and comment period.
• Residents have 30 days to review the Citizen Participation Plan from the date of the notice.
• During the 30-day public review and comment period, the document will be available for review at the City’s Community Development Department office. Copies of the document will be available to the public.
• Residents may file comments in writing at the City offices during the 30 -day period from the date of the notice.
• The City Council will adopt the Citizen Participation Plan as part of the Consolidated Plan.

Any change in the public participation process as outlined in this document will require an amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan.

2. Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plan

The steps outlined below provide opportunities for public involvement in the ConPlan and the Annual Action Plan:
• The City will consult with local public agencies that assist low- and moderate-income persons and areas, including City staff, state and federal agencies, neighboring local governments and regional agencies.
• The City will consult with private agencies, including local nonprofit service providers and advocates such as the local public housing agency, health agencies, homeless service providers, nonprofit housing developers and social service agencies (including those focusing on services to children, the elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, persons with substance abuse problems, etc.).

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 12

• The City will place public notices in the Press Enterprise newspaper, at City offices and the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum) 15 days in advance of a meeting. The notice will include the amount of funds available, the range of activities that could be undertaken and the amount that would benefit low- to moderate-income persons.
• A public hearing will be held before the City Council to solicit input on needs and priorities for the ConPlan and the Annual Action Plan. Virtual public hearings will be allowed, as recommended by HUD.
• Residents have 30 days to review the draft ConPlan and/or the draft Annual Action Plan from the date of the notice.
• Residents may file comments at the City offices during a 30-day period from the date of the notice.
• A public hearing will be held before the City Council to receive comments and approve the ConPlan and the Annual Action Plan. Virtual public hearings will be allowed, as recommended by HUD.
• The City Council will adopt the ConPlan and/or Annual Action Plan. • In preparing the final ConPlan and /or Annual Action Plan, careful consideration will be given to all comments and views expressed by the public, whether given as verbal testimony at the public hearing or submitted in writing during the review and comment period or during a virtual public hear ing, per HUD’s recommendation . The final documents will have a section that includes all comments, plus explanations as to why any comments were not accepted.

3. Substantial Amendments to the ConPlan and the Annual Action Plan

Amendments to the ConPlan or the Annual Action Plan will be necessary whenever one of the following is proposed:
• To make a substantial change in the allocation priorities or a substantial change in the method by which funds are distributed
o For the purpose of the Consolidated Plan, a “substantial change” involves a cumulative change in the program budget of 40 percent or more of the City’s total federal entitlement for the current program year
o If an amendment does not qualify as a substantial change (cumulative change of under 40 percent of the City’s total federal entitlement), it will be considered administrative in nature and documentation of the administrative amendment will be made to the c urrent Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan, and notification of the amendment will be provided to HUD via HUD’s electronic eConPlan suite.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 13

• To use CDBG funds (including program income) to carry out an activity not previously described in the Annual Action Plan or ConPlan; or
• To allow a substantial change in the purpose, scope, location or beneficiaries of a specific activity.

The following procedures apply to amendments:
• The City will place public notices in Press Enterprise newspaper, at the City offices and the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum) in advance of a 30-day public review and comment period. • Residents have 30 days to review the proposed amendment from the date of the notice.
• During the 30-day public review and comment period, the document will be available for review at the City’s Community Development Department and City Clerk’s office.

Copies of the document will be available to the public. • Residents may file comments at the City offices during the 30 -day period from the date of the notice.
• The City Council will adopt the amendment.
• In preparing a final amendment, careful consideration will be giv en to all comments and views expressed by the public, whether given as verbal or virtual testimony at the public hearing or submitted in writing during the review and comment period. The final amendment will have a section that includes all comments, plus explanations as to why any comments were not accepted.
• Substantial amendments are submitted to HUD as it occurs via HUD’s electronic eConPlan suite.

4. Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)

Every year, the City must submit to HUD a Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). In general, the CAPER must describe how funds were actually used and the extent to which these funds were used for activities that benefited low - and moderate-income people. Th e following steps outline the opportunities for public involvement in the CAPER:
• The City will place public notices in the Press Enterprise newspaper, at the City offices and the Jurupa Valley branches of the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum) in advance of a 15-day public review and comment period.
• Residents have 15 days to review the CAPER from the date of the notice.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 14

• During the 15-day public review and comment period, the document will be available for review at the City’s Community Development Department office. Copies of the document will be available to the public.
• Residents may file comments at the City offices during the 15-day period from the date of the notice.
• In preparing the CAPER, careful consideration will be given to all comments and views expressed by the public, whether given as verbal or virtual testimony at the public hearing or submitted in writing during the review and comment period. The final report will have a section that includes all comments, plus explanations as to why any comments were not accepted. The CAPER will be submitted to HUD via the electronic eConPlan suite.

5. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and Amendments

As an entitlement jurisdiction receiving CDBG funds, Jurupa Valley is required to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing and undertake fair housing planning in conjunction with its Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan. Fair housing planning consists of the following: (1) an Analysis of Impediments to fair housing choice; (2) actions to cover the effects of the identified impediments; and (3) maintenance of records to support the affirmatively furthering fair housing certification.

The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) document referenced above is defined as a comprehensive review of a state’s, region’s, or jurisdiction’s laws, regulations, and administrative policies , procedures, and practices as they relate to compliance with fair housing laws. The AI involves an assessment of how these laws, regulations, policies, and procedures affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing, and how conditions, both private and public, affect fair housing choice.

Once the City completes the AI, it must report on its implementation by summarizing the impediments identified in the analysis and describing the actions taken to overcome the effects of the impediments identified through the analysis in its CAPER. Each jurisdiction is required to maintain an AI and update the AI as necessary. Jurisdictions may also include the actions it plans to take to overcome the effects of impediments to fair housing choice during th e coming year in the Annual Plan that is submitted as part of the Consolidated Plan submission.

HUD requires that the Citizen Participation Plan delineate the process the City will utilize to adopt, amend, and to report accomplishments. Public review an d City Council adoption procedures mirror that of the Consolidated Plan. The following procedures will ensure that the public will have a chance to review and comment on the City’s Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 15

• The City will place public notices in the Press Enterprise newspaper, at the City offices and the Jurupa Valley branches of the Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) and on the City’s Web site (see Addendum) in advance of a 15-day public review and comment period.

The draft AI will be available for public review at the following locations:
• City Hall public counter
• Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) • The City’s Website

Upon request, reasonable accommodation will be ma de to make sure the AI will be available for review and comment by persons with disabilities.

At the end of the 30-day review period, the City Council will consider the adoption of the AI (or a substantial amendment to the AI) at a designated and publicly noticed City Council meeting. Approval of the AI or amendment of the AI requires a majority vote of the Jurupa Valley City Council. Annual accomplishments related to the AI will be reported in the yearly CAPER.

A substantial amendment to the AI will entail a material change in circumstances that affects the information on which the AI is based to the extent that the analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the AI no longer reflect actual circumstances. Examples include:
• Presidential declared disasters in the program participant's area that are of such a nature as to significantly impact the steps a program participant may need to take to affirmatively further fair housing
• Significant demographic changes
• New significant contributing factors in the participant's jurisdiction • Civil rights findings, determinations, settlements, or court orders • HUD's written notification specifying a material change that requires revision.

When a revision is required as a result of a material change, such a revision will be submitted within 12 months of the onset of the material change, or at such later date as HUD may provide. Where the material change is the result of a Presidential declared disaster, such time shall be automatically extended to the date that is two years after the date upon which the disaster declaration is made, and HUD may extend such deadline, upon request, for a good cause.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 16

Funding of Public Services

The City will issue a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) to the community for the Annual Action Plan, beginning with the 2018–2019 program year. The notice will identify the amount of CDBG funds available to public service agencies and a list of eligible activities. An application form will be developed and used by the City for funding requests. The agencies may apply to the City at the following address:

City of Jurupa Valley
City Manager’s Department
8930 Limonite Ave
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Applications will require the following information:

• Name of the organization, the contact person(s) and a brief history of the organization • Name of the project and a detailed description of project • Documentation identifying the need for such a project • Financial summary, including the amount of CDBG funds requested and other resources to leverage CDBG funds, as well as the potential uses of the funds • Objectives of the project and the intended beneficiaries • If the organization is requesting CDBG f unds from other jurisdictions for the same project, information included on the amount requested and the potential benefits for each jurisdiction

City staff will review the applications to determine the eligibility of the projects. The City’s committee will evaluate the funding request based on the benefits to low- and moderate-income residents and areas, on the projects’ feasibility, and if the proposed activity addresses a priority need identified in the Consolidated Plan. The selected activities will be recommended to the City Council for approval.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 17

Plans to Minimize Displacement of Persons
and Assist any Persons Displaced

If applicable, the City of Jurupa Valley, in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, the 1988 Common Rule, and the 1989 Barney Frank Act, will provide relocation assistance, as describe d in 24 CFR 570.606(b)(2), to each low - and moderate-income household displaced by the demolition of housing or by the conversion of a low- and moderate-income dwelling to another use as a direct result of assisted activities.

Consistent with the goals and objectives of activities assisted under the Act, the City of Jurupa Valley will include, but not be limited to, the following steps to minimize the displacement of persons from their homes:

A. Avoid, as much as possible, CDBG-funded projects which permanently displace persons from their homes.

B. Fully advise any residents who may be displaced of their rights and options for relocation benefits as required by federal regulations.

C. Assist displaced residents in filling out any required forms for assistance or to appeal City decisions regarding displacement or the level of relocation benefits.

A copy of the City’s Anti -Displacement and Relocation Plan is also available to interested residents upon request.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 18

Citizen Participation Summary

DOCUMENT
PUBLIC

PARTICIPATION

REQUIRED TIME FOR

PUBLIC REVIEW

REQUIRED

APPROVAL DEADLINE
Citizen Participation
Plan
Public Hearing
15-Day Notice 30-Day Public Review City Council N/A
ConPlan and/or
Annual Action Plan
Public Hearing
15-Day Notice
30-Day Public Review
City Council
Submit to HUD
45-days prior to
start of new
program year
Substantial
Amendments
Public Hearing
15-Day Notice 30-Day Public Review City Council Submit to HUD when complete
Administrative
Amendments No Public Hearing None City Manager Submit to HUD when complete
CAPER Public Hearing
15-Day Notice 15-Day Public Review City Council
Submit to HUD
within 90-days
of end of
program year
Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice
Public Hearing
15-Day Notice 30-Day Public Review City Council
45-days prior to
start of new
program year

Addendum

The City of Jurupa Valley City Manager’s Department is located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California.

The City Clerks Office located at: 8930 Limonite Ave. Jurupa Valley, California.

The Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Rubidoux and Glen Avon) are as follows:
• Louis Rubidoux: 5840 Mission Blvd.; (951) 682-5485
• Glen Avon: 9244 Galena St.; (951) 685-8121

The City’s Web site address is http://www.jurupavalley.org

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
3/19/2023 DRAFT – CON PLAN 2023-2028 19

Citizen Participation Plan Amendments For Disasters and Emergencies

In the event of a local, state, or national disaster, it may be necessary to rapidly deploy existing or new funding resources allocated to the City by HUD. During emergency situations, the Citizen Participation process may be streamlined to reduce delays in accessing grant funds pursuant to notices, waivers, award letters, or othe r HUD directives. Rapid deployment of HUD resources may require the substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan and/or Annual Action Plan(s).

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 Pursuant the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 (CARES Act), and regulatory waivers authorized by the U.S. Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Community Planning and Development, on March 31, 2020, the City of Jurupa Valley will implement the following regulatory relief waivers related to Citizen Participation:

1. Citizen Participation Public Comment Period for Consolidated Plan Amendment : The 30-day public comment period is waived for substantial amendments to no fewer than five (5) days.

This waiver will apply to Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, and other CARES Act related funding or program modifications.

2. Reasonable Notice and Opportunity to Comment: The Citizen Participation Plan sets forth the requirements for reasonable notice and o pportunity for public to comment. In an effort to contain COVID-19 by limiting public gatherings, and to respond quickly to the growing spread and effects of the coronavirus , reasonable notice and opportunities to comment are amended as follows:
• Reasonable Notice: Related notice(s) will be posted on the City’s website – www.jurupavalley.org, social media, and in the Public Notice display case located at the entrance of City of Jurupa Valley City Hall. The notice will be prominent and will provide a summary of the proposed amendment, information regarding the opportunity to provide comment, and information on how to view or obtain a copy of the draft amendment.
• Opportunity to Comment: Members of the public are invi ted to review the draft amendment and provide written comments. The specific process to participate in the public hearing and to provide public comments will be delineatd in the subject public notice. City staff will provide a written response to public comments received during the comment period. A summary of written comments received during the comment period, and staff responses will be incorporated into the amendment that is submitted to HUD at the conclusion of the comment period.

City staff will submit the subject amendment(s) to the HUD in a timely manner. This waiver will apply to Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, and other CARES Act related funding or program modifications. This waiver will be applicable through June 30, 2021, or as oth erwise directed by HUD.

-1-
12774-0102\2190699v2.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
CONSOLIDATED PLAN (2023 -2028), ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN (202 3-2024) AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
FOR THE CITY’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, and declare that:

A. On July 20, 2017, the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development formally notified the City of Jurupa that it qualified as a potential Entitlement Community in the accordance with the Federal laws and regulations related to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program;
B. On July 7, 2018, The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley adopted the City of Jurupa Valley’s first Consolidated Plan (2018 -2022), Annual Action Plan (2018 -2019), and Citizen’s Participation Plan in the development of the City’s CDBG program; C. As an entitlement community, the City of Jurupa Valley is required to adopt a Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), an Annual Action Plan (2023-2024), and a Citizen Participation Plan;
D. The Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Pl an documents how federal and local resources will be used to address the needs and objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan for a five-year period, including the first one-year period; E. The Citizen Participation Plan describes how the City will promote citizen participation for each CDBG program year;
F. The City hosted community meetings on July 14, 2022 and December 6, 2022 to gather community input and provide activity updates related to the City’s CDBG program; G. The Community Development Advisory Committee held public meetings on February 9 , 202 3 and February 23 , 20 23 to deliberate an award recommendation to the City Council for Public Service Grant funds;
H. As a result of the public health directive surrounding COVID -19, HUD has encouraged entitlement communities to emphasize “virtual” citizen participation , and the Citizen Participation Plan was amended to reflect the City’s commit ment to “virtual” civic participation during this pandemic;
-2-
12774-0102\2190699v2.doc
I. The draft Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), the Annual Action Plan (2023-2024) and the Citizen Participation Plan were posted on the City’s website for public review and comment, and hard copies were made available at City Hall front counter during the required 30-day public comment period;
J. On April 20, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to recei ve public comments on the Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), the Annual Action Plan (2023-2024) and the Citizen Participation Plan;
K. At the public hearing all persons interested in the Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), the Annual Action Plan (2023-2024) and the Citizen Participation Plan had the opportunity to present their comments on these plans to the City Council; and L. The City Council has reviewed and considered the proposed Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), the Annual Action Plan (2023-2024) and the Citizen Participation Plan, as well as any related public comments.

Section 2. Adoption. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby adopts the Consolidated Plan (2023-2028), the Annual Action Plan (2023-2024) and the Citizen Participation Plan in the form presented to the City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Section 3. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 20th day of April, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-
12774-0102\2190699v2.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that t he foregoing Resolution No. 2023-26, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 20th day of April, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 20th day of April, 2023.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.C
PUBL

IC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING

EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES

AGREEMENT FOR BOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR LAND

DEVELOPMENT (BOLD) PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEES FOR TRACT NOS. 36947 AND 32721 (204 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS) LOCATED WEST OF 28TH STREET AND CANAL STREET; AND MAKING A FINDING OF SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FOR

THE FINANCING OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS BY A COMMUNITY

FACILITIES DISTRICT TO BE FORMED BY THE CALIFORNIA

MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council conduct a public hearing (the “Hearing”) regarding the financing of public improvements to be owned by the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City”) or the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (the “Park District”) in connection with the Emerald Ridge/Hacienda development through the formation of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “CMFA”); and
2) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-27, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT

COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE BOND

OPPORTUNITIES FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT (BOLD) PROGRAM AND

MAKING A FINDING OF SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FOR THE FINANCING OF

CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS BY A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT TO BE

FORMED BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

BACKGROUND

CMFA is a joint exercise of powers authority, the members of which include numerous cities, counties and other local agencies in the State of California, including the City.

At the request of Highpointe Emerald Ridge LLC (the “Developer”), CMFA intends to conduct proceedings under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (California Government Code section 53311 et seq.) (the “Mello-Roos Act”) to form a Community Facilities District (the “CFD”) for the Emerald Ridge/Hacienda development as part of CMFA’s Bond Opportunities for Land Development (“BOLD”) program. Once formed, the CFD will levy special taxes to be paid by the property taxpayers within the CFD. It is expected that the CFD will issue bonds to be secured and repaid by the special tax revenues. The purpose of forming this CFD is to finance certain facilities (the “CFD Improvements”) and/or development impact fees (which fees are used for capital improvements) (the “CFD Fees”).

Although the CFD will be formed within the City’s jurisdiction, the use of the BOLD program means that the CMFA and its consultant team will form and approve the CFD.

CMFA will use the s ervices of a special tax consultant and administrator to create the special tax formula and administer, levy, and collect the special taxes. CMFA will issue and handle the sale of the CFD bonds and handle continuing disclosure reporting requirements relat ing to the bonds. Except for the holding of the Hearing and as described below in connection with the JCFA, the City will have minimal involvement in any of the formation of the CFD, the issuance of the bonds, or the CFD administration.

Per information provided by CMFA and the Developer, it is currently intended that the financed projects will consist of facilities and capital improvements to be owned by the City or the Park District.

Public Hearing and Finding of Public Benefits

CMFA has requested that the City Council hold the Hearing. CMFA’s counsel has indicated that pursuant to Government Code Section 6586.5, CMFA can issue bonds for the financing only after the City -- which has land use jurisdiction over the Emerald Ridge/Hacienda development -- holds a public hearing and finds that the financing will result in significant public benefit. Such finding will pertain to not just the City improvements but also the Park District improvements to be financed.

CMFA has provided a copy of the Park District’s resolution, making a finding that the improvements to be financed by the Park District will result in significant public benefit.

By adopting the attached resolution at the conclusion of the Hearing, the City Council will make a finding of significant benefits with respect to the financing of the City improvements and the Park District improvements, based on the Hearing and the Park District resolution.

Page | 3

Joint Community Facilities Agreement (JCFA); City Projects to be Financed

Under the Mello- Roos Act, CMFA must enter into the JCFA with the City in order to include the City’s improvements as part of the CFD financing. City staff understands that CMFA will enter into a similar agreement with the Park District in connection with the Park District’s improvements.

Pursuant to the City’s JCFA, after CMFA issues bonds for this financing, a portion of the bond proceeds will be deposited into a “Project Fund,” from which the City can request disbursements. It is intended that the disbursements will satisfy certain development impact fees that would otherwise be paid by the Developer. The City will then spend moneys so received on capital improvements that would have been funded by the related development impact fees.

CMFA bonds will be issued as “tax-exempt bonds” -- the interest on which, when received by a bondholder, will generally be excluded from federal income tax. There are strict federal tax rules relating to the issuance of tax -exempt bonds. As indicated in the form of disbursement request attached to the JCFA, the City will have to make certain representations and covenants for the benefit of CMFA in connection with each draw from the Project Fund. Per CMFA’s counsel, to comply with the applicable federal tax law, at the t ime of bond issuance, there must be a reasonable expectation that a significant portion of the bond proceeds will be spent down within three years.

Because of the restrictions under federal tax law, staff recommends that only the transportation circulation improvements of the recently approved Development Impact Fee (DIF) program be included in the JCFA. These projects are the only component of the DIF that staff believes can meet the expenditure time frame. Staff estimates that the transportation circulation improvements fee for residential development amounts to

56.98% of the overall DIF for the Emerald Ridge/Hacienda development project.

Certain Costs

As described above, it is anticipated that CMFA will issue bonds to provide financing for the City’s and the Park District’s improvements. CMFA will pay debt service (principal and interest) on the bonds from the special tax revenues to be collected from the property taxpayers within the CFD. The special tax rates will be established by CMFA taking into consideration the anticipated amounts to be deposited into the project funds for the City improvements and the Park District improvements (and the bond sizing necessary to generate such amounts), plus the costs of issuance of the bonds, and other costs of administering the CFD.

CMFA charges an annual fee for the administration of each community facilities district it forms and a fee for each issuance of bonds (the latter of which is paid out of the bond proceeds). CMFA contributes a portion of the fees it receives to local charities.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-27

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY

OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT IN

CONNECTION WITH THE BOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR LAND

DEVELOPMENT (BOLD) PROGRAM AND MAKING A FINDING OF

SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FOR THE FINANCING OF CERTAIN

IMPROVEMENTS BY A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT TO BE

FORMED BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “CMFA”) is a joint exercise of powers authority, the members of which include numerous cities, counties and other local agencies in the State of California (the “State”), including the City of Jurup a Valley (the “City”); and

WHEREAS, at the request of Highpointe Emerald Ridge LLC and its successors and assigns (the “Developer”), CMFA has conducted or intends to conduct proceedings under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (California Government Code section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”) to form a community facilities district (the “CFD”) to finance certain public facilities and development impact fees used for capital improvements authorized to be financed under the Act (the “CFD Improvem ents” and the “CFD Fees,” respectively) as part of its Bond Opportunities for Land Development (“BOLD”) program; and

WHEREAS, CMFA intends to utilize the proceeds of sale of special tax bonds of the CFD to finance some or all of the CFD Improvements and CFD Fees; and

WHEREAS, the CFD Improvements and the public improvements to be financed by the CFD Fees will include roads, parks and other facilities (together, the “Financed Improvements”) to be owned by the City of the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (the “Park District”); and

WHEREAS, the Financed Improvements to be owned by the City shall be referred to herein as the “City Improvements” and the Financed Improvements to be owned by the Park District shall be referred to herein as the “Park District Improvements”; and

WHEREAS, under Section 53316.2 of the Act, CMFA may form the CFD to, among other things, finance CFD Fees payable and/or CFD Improvements to be acquired by the City, provided CMFA and the City enter into a joint community facilities agreement; and

WHEREAS, the City is willing to cooperate with CMFA in accomplishing the financing of the City CFD Fees and/or City Improvements eligible to be financed by the Act, and to confer upon CMFA full power to provide financing for such items in the event that proceeds of special taxes and/or bonds in the CFD become available and are utilized for such purpose; and

-2-
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 6586.5, notice was published at least five days prior to the adoption of this resolu tion at a public hearing (the “Hearing”), which was duly conducted by this City Council concerning the significant public benefits of the BOLD Program and the financing of the City Improvements and the Park District Improvements; and

WHEREAS, the governing board of the Park District adopted Resolution No. 2022-02 on January 13, 2022 (the “Park District Resolution”), and made a finding that the issuance of bonds by CMFA in connection with the BOLD Program for the financing of the Park District Improvements will provide significant benefit, including without limitation, savings in effective interest rate, bond preparation, bond underwriting and bond issuance costs and the more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley as follows:

Section 1. Based on the Hearing and the Park District Resolution, the City Council hereby finds and declares that the issuance of bonds by the CMFA in connection with the BOLD Program for the financing of the Financed Improvements will provide significant public benefits, including without limitation, savings in effective interest rate, bond preparation, bond underwriting and bond issuance costs and the more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development within the City.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the execution and delivery of a joint community facilities agreement with CMFA in connection with the development of the approximately 47-acre property owned by the Developer known as “Tract Nos. 36947 and 32721” or “Emeral d Ridge /Hacienda” projects . The joint community facilities agreement shall be substantially in the form presented to the City Council and attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “JCFA”), with such changes as the City Manager may deem appropriate or necessary, t he execution and delivery of the JCFA being conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes.

The City Council further finds and declares that entrance into the JCFA will be beneficial to residents of the City.

Section 3. The City Manager and other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take such other actions and execute and deliver such other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution.

Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution and the JCFA, as executed by the City, to the Secretary of CMFA.

-3-

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 20th day of April, 2023.

Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-27 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 20th day of April, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 20th day of April, 2023.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

A-1

EXHIBIT A

Joint Community Facilities Agreement

(Substantial Final Form)

See attached

CMFA BOLD PROGRAM

Joint Community Facilities Agreement
by and between
CMFA and City of Jurupa Valley

Relating to:

California Municipal Finance Authority
Community Facilities District No. 2023-4
(Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District – Emerald Ridge)

(Tract Nos. 36947 and 32721 in the City)

This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated for convenience as of March 1, 2023, by and between the California Municipal Finance Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the state of California (“CMFA”), and the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation and general law city, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the state of California (the “ City,” and together with CMFA, the “Parties”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, at the request of Highpointe Emerald Ridge LLC and its successors and assigns (the “Developer ”), CMFA intends to conduct proceedings under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (California Government Code section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”) to form a community facilities district (the “CFD”) to finance certain public facilities and development impact fees used for capital improvements authorized to be financed under the Act (the “CFD Improvements” and the “CFD Fees,” respectively) as part of its Bond Opportunities for Land Development (“BOLD”) program;

WHEREAS, the CFD Improvements and CFD Fees will be described in the resolution of formation for the CFD, including CFD Fees payable and/or CFD Improvements to be acquired by the City and set forth on Exhibit A hereto (the “City Fees” and the “City Improvements,” respectively);

WHEREAS, CMFA intends to utilize the proceeds of sale of special tax bonds of the CFDs (the “Bonds”) to finance some or all of the City Fees and/or City Improvements;

WHEREAS, under Section 53316.2 of the Act, CMFA may form the CFD to, among other things, finance the City Fees and/or City Improvements, provided that CMFA and the City enter into a joint community facilities agreement such as this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, City is willing to cooperate with CMFA in accomplishing the financing of the City Fees and/or City Improvements eligible to be financed by the Act, and to confer upon CMFA full power to provide financing for the City Fees and/or City Improvements in the event that proceeds of special taxes and/or bonds in a CFD become available and are utilized for such purpose; provided, that each other local agency having its development impact fees or similar amounts financed through the CFD (e.g., school district fees) are doing so without receiving any premium above the fee or amount that would otherwise be due and payable; -2-

WHEREAS, this Agreement is made under the authority of Section 53316.2 of the Act; and

WHEREAS, in consideration for the mutual undertakings of the Parties stated herein, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT:

1. Administration of CFD and Issuance of Bonds by CMFA. CMFA shall administer the CFD, including employing and paying all consultants, annually levying the special tax and paying and administering the Bonds, and complying with all state and federal requirements appertaining to the proceedings establishing the CFD and issuing and using the proceeds of the Bonds, including the requirements of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, the rate and method of apportionment of special tax for the CFD shall take into account the City’s policies regarding overall projected tax rates on properties in the City and account for any special taxes and/or assessments anticipated to be levied by the City (including, but not limited to, those to be levied any community facilities district to be formed by the City to finance services) on properties within the CFD , such that, after taking into account the anticipated assessments to be levied by the City and any other applicable local agencies on properties within the CFD, the overall projected tax rates on properties in the CFD shall not exceed any maximum amount set forth in any such City policy in effect at the time of formation of the applicable CFD.

2. Agreement to Hold City Fees. CMFA shall hold or cause to be held within a separate fund, account or subaccount (the “Project Fund”) special taxes and/or Bond proceeds from the CFD. All City Fees funded through Bond proceeds shall be deemed paid by the Developer in the amount of the Bond proceeds on the date that such Bond proceeds are deposited in the Project Fund. CMFA shall disburse, or cause to be disbursed, moneys on deposit in the Project Fund only as provided herein.

3. Disbursements from Project Funds. Moneys on deposit in the Project Fund shall be disbursed pursuant to written requisitions of CMFA following receipt by CMFA of requisitions signed by the City, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and executed by the City Manager or his or her designee (each, an “Authorized Officer”). CMFA and its designees, including any trustee or fiscal agent holding funds in a Project Fund, may conclusively rely on such requisitions for purposes of making such disbursements . All d isbursements from the Project Fund to the City shall be made by wire transfer of immediately available funds or by check payable to the City’s bank account number at a bank located within the United States on file with CMFA as part of the BOLD program , unless another method of payment is requested in writing by the City.

4. Use of City Fees for Public Capital Improvements
. The City shall utilize the City
Fees for public capital improvements to be owned by the City. The City acknowledges that, subject to approval of disbursements as set forth in Section 3 above, the City Fees may be financed through a CFD formed by CMFA as part of the BOLD program, through the issuance of one or more series of Bonds and/or from proceeds of special taxes of the CFD.

5. Purchase of City Improvements
. To the extent the City is acquiring City
Improvements using Bond proceeds or special taxes generated by a CFD, the City shall work with the Developer to put in place all necessary agreements, certifi cates or other documents -3-
required for the City to acquire such improvements. Neither CMFA nor any of its agents shall be responsible for inspection or review of any such documents relating to financed City Improvements, unless set forth in a separate written agreement between CMFA and the City providing for the same.

6. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by a writing signed by the Parties, including to update Exhibit A to reflect additional or different City Fees and/or City Improvements to be financed by the CFD.

7. Term of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from this date to and including its termination by mutual written agreement of the Parties hereto. CMFA agrees to terminate this agreement upon request of the City upon delivery to CMFA of an opinion Bond Counsel to the effect that the termination of this Agreement will not adversely affect the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes.

8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.

[Signatures on Following Page]

-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have caused this A greement to be executed by their authorized representatives as of the effective date stated above.

CMFA:

CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL

FINANCE AUTHORITY

By: ______________________________
Name: Edward J. Becker
Title: Executive Director

CITY:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

By: _____________________________
Name: Rod B. Butler
Title: City Manager

A-1

EXHIBIT A

DESCRIPTION OF CITY FEES AND/OR CITY IMPROVEMENTS

Development Impact Fees for Transportation/Circulation Improvements , in the approximate amount of $639,336, as approved by the City Council per Resolution No. 2023 -___, adopted on __________, 2023.

B-1

EXHIBIT B

DISBURSEMENT REQUEST FORM

To:

California Municipal Finance Authority
2111 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 320
Carlsbad, California 92011

Re: BOLD Program - Request for Disbursement of Bond Proceeds

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City”) hereby requests a disbursement from the Project Fund set forth below, and certifies that the amounts of development impact fees and/or capital improvements listed below have been or will be spent by the City as of the date indicated below or within 5 days thereafter:

Subaccount(s) Amount(s)
[example, CMFA CFD No. 2023-4,
Special Tax Bonds Series 20__, Project Fund] $

Total:

Wiring Instructions: ___________________________

The undersigned hereby additionally certifies as follows:

1. These funds have been or will be used to acquire and/or construct capital improvements, and this disbursement is not being made for the purpose of reinvestment.

2. None of the expenditures for which payment is requested have been reimbursed previously from other sources of funds.

3. If the total amount above is greater than the funds held by CMFA on behalf of the City in the Subaccount(s) identified above, CMFA is authorized to amend the amount requested to be equal to the amount of such funds.

B-2

4. The amounts being disbursed pursuant to this request are being used to finance or refinance certain public infrastructure and facilities (the “Improvements”). The City will own, and for the entire useful life of such Improvements reasonably expects to own, all of such Improvements. The Improvements consist of the following:

[Describe the improvements]

5. To the extent any of such Improvements are sold to an entity that is not a state or local government, the City will seek the advice and approval of bond counsel to CMFA for the BOLD program prior to any such sale. The City will not allow any of such Improvements to be used (for example, by lease or other contract) in the trade or business of any nongovernmental persons (other than in their roles as members of the general public). All of such Improvements will be used in the performance of essential governmental functions of the City or another state or local government agency. The average expected useful life of such Improvements is at least ____ years. The representations and covenants contained in this paragraph are intended to support the conclusion that the interest paid on the bonds issued to finance the Improvements is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”).

Dated:

Signature:

Print Name:

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 20, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.D
PUBL
IC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 23003
(CZ23003) CONSISTING OF 3.86 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE

NORTH WEST INTERSECTION OF BELLEGRAVE AVENUE AND VAN

BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE BAIN FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL (APNS: 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -008, -009, -010, -011, -014, AND -015) FROM I -P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO B- P (BUSINESS - PARK) AND DETERMINE THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15162
____________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-05, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 23003 CONSISTING OF 3.86 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE NORTH WEST INTERSECTION OF

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE AND VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF
THE BAIN DRAINAGE CHANNEL (APNS: 156 -370-001, -002, -003, -004, - 005, -006, -008, -009, -010, -011, -014, AND -015) FROM I-P (INDUSTRIAL

PARK) TO B- P (BUSINESS PARK), AND FINDING NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15162

BACKGROUND
2017 General Plan
On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. The adoption included 21 amendments to the

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

General Plan Land Use Map that addressed land use issues, including providing additional commercial and residential uses and buffering residential development from industrial uses. By law, a city’s zoning must be consistent with its General Plan. Many of the 21 Land Use Map changes resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the General Plan.

Upon General Plan adoption, the Council acknowledged that a zoning implementation program would be needed to evaluate the appropriate zoning of the Land Use Amendments (LUAs). On November 15, 2018, the City Council initiated a Zoning Implementation Program and requested that the Planning Commission evaluate appropriate zoning for the LUA areas. The goal was to make recommendations for Zoning Map amendments to the City Council that are consistent with the Gener al Plan Land Use Map. As directed, the Planning Commission has and will continue to conduct public hearings and forward recommendations on rezones to the Council.

Between January 2019 and October 7, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted multiple study sessions to consider the various Land Use Amendment areas (LUAs) delineated in geographical areas named as “groupings.” For example, there were four LUAs in the northeast quadrant of the City that were processed as “Group 1.” The City Council approved Groups 1 – 3 between the years of 2019 and 2022. The background, issues, and recommended zones were presented to the Planning Commission for all sites within those groups and the Planning Commission was supportive of the recommended zone changes. Thus far, almost all of the proposed changes to the LUA ’s have been completed and approved.

Other General Plan Inconsistency
In addition to the changes of zones affiliated with the LUAs above, it has been discovered that the General Plan and Zoning map are inconsis tent in a number of other areas. The City has initiated zone changes for these areas to ensure compliance with State law and for the expedient processing of land use entitlements in the future. Change of Zone No. 23003 (CZ23003) is proposed to correct a recently identified inconsistency found at the northwest corner of Bellegrave Avenue and Van Buren Boulevard. The General Plan land use designation is Business Park (B-P) and the zoning classification is Industrial Park (I- P). The only zone that is consistent with a B-P land use designation is B-P zone.

On February 22, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 3 – 0 (with one Planning Commissioner absent, and the other abstaining due to a conflict of interest), to adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council change the zoning to Business Park to be consistent with the General Plan.

ANALYSIS
CZ23003 consists of 10 parcels on 3.86 acres located near the north west intersection of Bellegrave Avenue and Van Buren Boulevard and west of the Bain Flood Control Channel (APNs 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -008, -009, -010, -011, -014, and -015).

Surrounding land uses include vacant land to the north, auto storage to the west, scattered single-family homes to the south and light industrial uses and manufacturing - service commercial uses to the east.

Page | 3

It is important to note that the “Business Park” (B-P) zone is only consistent with the General Plan land use designation of “Business Park ,” and as a result, no new discretionary uses could be approved at this location due to the existing inconsistency .

To promote wider economic opportunities, enhance the financial viability for the existing businesses, existing business park, and to achieve the legal mandate of State law to be consistent with the General Plan, it is recommended that the zone be changed to BP (Business Park). In addition, Business Park zone will result in uses that are more compatible with the residential uses to the south.

EXHIBIT 1. AERIAL PHOTO CZ23003

TABLE 1. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, - 008, -009, -010, 011, -014, -015
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 3.86

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

DESIGNATION

BUSINESS PARK

EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION INDUSTRIAL PARK

Page | 4

EXHIBIT 2. EXISTING ZONING

EXHIBIT 3. PROPOSED ZONING

Page | 5

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Previous Environmental Document (PED) Review Determination was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.).

The PED was prepared to determine if the zone change (Project) is within the scope of the analysis contained in City of Jurupa Valley, 2017 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025 certified by the City Council on September 17, 2017, and to ensure that the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.

It was determined that t he zone change would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. The effects associated with the zone change would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved 2017 General Plan FEIR, and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the 2017 G eneral Plan FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR, thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental R eview is required.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
An advertisement for this public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on April 10, 2023. No comments have been received at the time of this report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Costs associated with the change of zone are covered by the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action: That the City Council approve Change of Zone No. 23003, by adopting Ordinance No. 2023-05,

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

3. Council may elect not to approve Change of Zone No. 23003.

ATTACHMENT 1
City Council Ordinance
-1-

ORDINANCE NO. 2023-05

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDME NT TO THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 2 3003 CONSISTING OF 3. 86

ACRES LOCATED NEAR T HE NORTH WEST

INTERSECTION OF BELL EGRAVE AVENUE AND VA N

BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE BAIN
DRAINAGE CHANNEL (APNS 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, - 005, -006, -008,-009, -010, -011, -014, -015) FROM I -P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO B -P (BUSINE SS P ARK), AND

FINDING NO FURTHER ENVIRONME NTAL REVIEW IS
REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. Upon General Plan adoption, the Council acknowledged that a zoning implementation program would be needed to evaluate the appropriate zoning of the Land Use Amendments (LUA’s). O n November 15, 2018, the City Council initiated a Zoning Implementation Program and requested that the Planning Commission evaluate appropriate zoning for the LUA areas.

Section 2. Change of Zone.
(a) The City has initiated Change of Zone No. 23003 (CZ23003) to rezone approximately 3.86 acres located near the north west intersection of Bellegrave Avenue and Van Buren Boulevard and west of the Bain Drainage Channel (APNs 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, - 005, -006, -008,-009, -010, -011, -014, -015) from I-P (Industrial Park) to B-P (Business Park). (b) Section 9.285.010. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that amendments to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 65800 et seq. , as now enacted or hereafter amended, and with the requirements of Title 9. Government Code Section 65853 provides that an amendment to a zoning ordinance, which amendment changes any property from one zone to another, shall be adopted in the manner set forth in Sections 65854 to 65857, inclusive. (c) Government Code Section 65854 provides that the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance , with notice of the hearing given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and, if the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance affects the permitted uses of real property, also given pursuant to Government Code Section 65091. Additionally, Sections 9.285.040.(1) and (2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that the Planning Commission shall hold a noticed public hearing on a proposed amendment to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code that proposes to change property from one zone to another.

-2-

(d) Government Code Section 65855 provides that after the hearing, the Planning Commission must render its decision in the form of a written recommendation to the legislative body, which must include the reasons for the recommendation, the relationship of the proposed amendment to applicable general and specific plans, and must transmit the recommendation to the legislative body in such form and manner as may be specified by the legislative body. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that, after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission must render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposed amendment to 2017 General Plan. A copy of the recommendation shall be mailed to the applicant and proof thereof shall be shown on the original transmitted to the City Council. (e) Government Code Section 65856(a) provides that upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the legislative body must hold a public hearing.

Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.
(f) Government Code Section 65857 provides that the legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided that any modification of the proposed ordinance or amendment by the legislative body not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearing, must first be referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing thereon. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.( 5) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing the City Council must render its decision within a reasonable time and may approve, modify , or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, however, that any proposed modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Planning Commission must first be referred back to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation.

Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, and declare that:
(a) Change of Zone No. 23003 (the “Project”) was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner p rescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances.
(b) On February 22 , 202 3, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. Following a discussion of the Project the Planning Commission voted 3-0, with one Commissioner absent and one Commissioner abstaining due to a potential conflict of interest , to recommend approval of the Project by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-06, recommending approval of

-3-

the Project and finding no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 .
(c) On April 20, 2023, the City Cou ncil of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley make s the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub. Res.

Code § 21000 et seq.) and Section 15162 of the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff has considered the potential environmental impacts of the Project.

On September 7, 2017, the Jurupa Valley City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-14 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025, for the Jurupa Valley General Plan. City staff reviewed the FEIR for the Jurupa Valley General Plan, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and prepared a Previous Environmental Document Review Determination in accordance with CEQA for the Project. Based on that review, the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department has determined that the Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effe cts not discussed in the F EIR. All potential environmental i mpacts associated with the Project are adequately addressed by the FEIR, and the mitigation measures contained in the FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. (b) The City Council has independently reviewed the Previous Environm ental Document Review Determination, and based upon the whole record before it, the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination, and its independent review and judgment, finds that that the Project is not subject to further environmental review pu rsuant to the Guidelines because:
1) The Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; and 2) All potential environmental impacts associated with the Project are adequately addressed by the FEIR, and the mitigation measures contained in the FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. (c) The custodian of records for the FEIR, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council determination is based, is the Community

-4-

Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.

Section 5. Findings for Approval of Change of Zone. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby finds and determines that Change of Zone No. 23003 should be adopted because Change of Zone No. 23003 is consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan in that the site is zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and has a land use designation of Business Park. Change of Zone No. 23003 will change the zoning of the site to B-P (Business Park) to provide consistency between the General Plan Map and zoning designation.

Section 6. Approval of Change of Zone. Based on the for egoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby:
1) Approves Change of Zone No. 23003 (CZ23003) consisting of 3.86 acres located near the northwest intersection of Bellegrave Avenue and Van Buren Boulevard and west of the Bain Drainage Channel (APNs 156-370-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -008,-009, -010, -011, -014, -015) from I-P (Industrial Park) to B -P (Business Park) as depicted in Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and
2) Directs the City Manager to revise the official City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Map to designate the properties as being in these new zones.

Section 7. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 8. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside incorporated by the City of Jurupa Valley that may in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.

Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 4th day of May, 2023.

-5-

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -05 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of April, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of May, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 4th day of May, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

“EXHIBIT A”
Existing Zoning (Industrial Park)

A-2

Proposed Zoning (Business Park)

ATTACHMENT 2
Environmental Determination
Previous Environmental Document (PED)
Review Determination
Zoning Implementation Program to Rezone Properties Redesignated by the 2017 General Plan
Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8390 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Tamara Campbell, Principal Planner
(951) 332-6464
[email protected]
January 12, 2023
CZ22003-CZ22005-CZ23003

Page 1 ends

Jurupa Valley City CouncilApril 20, 2023

Jurupa Valley City Council
April 20, 2023