Jurupa Valley City Council
July 27, 2023

STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $303.66 1 $303.66
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $303.66 Cost Per Parcel $303.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $25.81 1 $25.81
Contingency $30.36 1 $30.36
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $15.18 1 $15.18
Total Incidental Costs $71.35 Cost Per Parcel $71.35
Total Projected Costs $375.01 Cost Per Parcel $375.01
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $412.28
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$412.28
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $94.74
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$94.74
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $804.89 4.72 $170.53 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $804.89 Cost Per Acre $170.53 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $68.42 4.72 $14.50
Contingency $80.49 4.72 $17.05
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $33.05 4.72 $7.00
Total Incidental Costs $181.96 Cost Per Acre $38.55
Total Projected Costs $986.85 Cost Per Acre $209.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $381.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$80.82
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$381.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $80.82
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($605.36)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $328.05
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$328.05
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $207.10 0.37 $559.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $207.10 Cost Per Acre $559.73 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $17.61 0.37 $47.59
Contingency $20.71 0.37 $55.97
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $11.02 0.37 $29.78
Total Incidental Costs $49.34 Cost Per Acre $133.35
Total Projected Costs $256.44 Cost Per Acre $693.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $422.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$422.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$166.05
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $784.06
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $166.05
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$950.11
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 3.84 $158.15 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Acre $158.15 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $51.61 3.84 $13.44
Contingency $60.73 3.84 $15.82
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $27.54 3.84 $7.17
Total Incidental Costs $139.88 Cost Per Acre $36.43
Total Projected Costs $747.17 Cost Per Acre $194.58
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $960.40
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$960.40
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$213.23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $748.95
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $250.10
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$999.05
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $495.77 6.45 $76.86
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $495.77 Cost Per Acre $76.86 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $42.14 6.45 $6.53
Contingency $49.58 6.45 $7.69
Total Incidental Costs $91.72 Cost Per Acre $14.22
Total Projected Costs $587.49 Cost Per Acre $91.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $2,589.11
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,589.11
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$2,001.62
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $8,757.80
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,001.62
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,759.42
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,531.54 Cost Per Acre $75.89 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $147.94 20.18 $7.33
Contingency $174.04 20.18 $8.62
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $87.02 20.18 $4.31
Total Incidental Costs $409.00 Cost Per Acre $20.27
Total Projected Costs $1,940.54 Cost Per Acre $96.16
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,770.95
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,770.95
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$1,830.41
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $6,165.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,830.41
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$7,996.06
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 791.81 3.87 $204.60
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 2507.45 3.87 $647.92 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,299.26 Cost Per Acre $852.52 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $280.44 3.87 $72.47
Contingency $329.93 3.87 $85.25
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $110.17 3.87 $28.47
Total Incidental Costs $720.54 Cost Per Acre $186.19
Total Projected Costs $4,019.80 Cost Per Acre $1,038.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,881.90
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,881.90
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($137.90)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,129.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,129.65
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 415.54 0.5 $831.08
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $415.54 Cost Per Acre $831.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $35.32 0.5 $70.64
Contingency $41.56 0.5 $83.12
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $20.78 0.5 $41.56
Total Incidental Costs $97.66 Cost Per Acre $195.32
Total Projected Costs $513.20 Cost Per Acre $1,026.40
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $957.12
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$957.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$443.92
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,224.59
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $443.92
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,668.51
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 1,419.43 3.66 $387.82 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,419.43 Cost Per Acre $387.82 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $120.65 3.66 $32.96
Contingency $141.94 3.66 $38.78
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $66.10 3.66 $18.06
Total Incidental Costs $328.69 Cost Per Acre $89.81
Total Projected Costs $1,748.12 Cost Per Acre $477.63
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,282.10
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,282.10
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.02)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $411.68
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$411.68
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 281.28 2.38 $118.18
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $281.28 Cost Per Acre $118.18 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $23.91 2.38 $10.05
Contingency $28.13 2.38 $11.82
Total Incidental Costs $52.04 Cost Per Acre $21.87
Total Projected Costs $333.32 Cost Per Acre $140.05
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.09
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$333.32
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$140.05
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,136.04
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,136.04
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A (68-9963)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent660.95 3 $220.32 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $660.95 Cost Per Parcel $220.32 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $56.18 3 $18.73
Contingency $66.09 3 $22.03
Total Incidental Costs $122.27 Cost Per Parcel $40.76
Total Projected Costs $783.22 Cost Per Parcel $261.07
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $787.73
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$787.73
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $4.51
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B (68-9956)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 100 Watt 9,500 Lumen LED Equivalent124.35 3 $41.45 Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent136.89 3 $45.63 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $261.24 Cost Per Parcel $87.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $22.20 3 $7.40
Operating Reserve $26.12 3 $8.71
Total Incidental Costs $48.32 Cost Per Parcel $16.11
Total Projected Costs $309.56 Cost Per Parcel $103.19
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $311.31
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.77
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$309.56
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.19
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C (68-9964)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 50 Watt LED 369.87 16 $23.12
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 134.70 16 $8.42
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $504.57 Cost Per Parcel $31.54 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $42.89 16 $2.68
Operating Reserve $50.46 16 $3.15
Total Incidental Costs $93.35 Cost Per Parcel $5.83
Total Projected Costs $597.92 Cost Per Parcel $37.37
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $601.29
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$37.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$597.92
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $37.37
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D (68-0238)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 850.13 2 $425.07
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $850.13 Cost Per Parcel $425.07 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $72.26 2 $36.13
Operating Reserve $85.02 2 $42.51
Total Incidental Costs $157.28 Cost Per Parcel $78.64
Total Projected Costs $1,007.41 Cost Per Parcel $503.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,013.07
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$506.54
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,007.41
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$503.71
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E (68-0239)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 1,323.80 8 $165.48
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs$1,323.80 Cost Per Parcel $165.48 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $112.53 8 $14.07
Operating Reserve $132.38 8 $16.55
Total Incidental Costs $244.91 Cost Per Parcel $30.61
Total Projected Costs $1,568.71 Cost Per Parcel $196.09 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,577.52
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.19
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,568.71
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$196.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

Zone 2-E is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F (68-0240)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED $134.28 6 $22.38
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $134.28 Cost Per Parcel $22.38 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $11.41 6 $1.90
Operating Reserve $13.43 6 $2.24
Total Incidental Costs $24.84 Cost Per Parcel $4.14
Total Projected Costs $159.12 Cost Per Parcel $26.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $160.01
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$26.67
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$159.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $26.52
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Streetlights (5) LED (Hall Ave) 544.61 23.44 $23.23
Streetlights (2) LED (Agua Mansa) 244.83 23.44 $10.45
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $789.44 Cost Per Acre $33.68 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $67.10 23.44 $2.86
Operating Reserve $78.95 23.44 $3.37
Total Incidental Costs $146.05 Cost Per Acre $6.23
Total Projected Costs $935.49 Cost Per Acre $39.92
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$20.01
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$469.08
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $20.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.41)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.

STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-G (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Part IV – Assessment Diagrams
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.

Information identified on these maps was received fro m several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.

14 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1

Page B-2

Page B-3

Page B-4

Page B-5

Page B-6

Page B-7

Page B-8

Page B-9

Page B-10

Page B-11

Page B-12

Page B-13

Page B-14

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-A
Serrano Business Center (PM 36828)

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 9, T.2S., R.6W., S.B.M. Schedule “E”

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-210-093

156-210-093

Project Site
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-B
TR 36977

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T2SR6W SEC 12 PSEC

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
171-260-013

171-260-013
Project Site

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2 - C
TR 32722

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 7, T.2S, R. 5W

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT

174-170-039
174-170-03040
174-170-03041

Project Site

For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-E

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 W, S.B.M.

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
175-160-027 175-160-044
Project Site
175-160-028 175-160-045
175-160-038 175-160-046
175-160-042 175-160-047
175-160-027
175-160-028
175-160-045
175-160-038
175-160-042
175-160-044
175-160-047
175-160-046
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s Parcel
numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map
as of the date of the Report.

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-F

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 11, T. 2 S, R. 6 W, S.B.M.

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
169-060-005

Project Site
169-060-005

GLEN ST

MISSION BLVD

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTNING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-G

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFONRIA PORTIONS OF PARCEL MAP 24088, RECORDED IN BOOK 177, PAGE 37 OF MAPS, PORTION OF PARCEL MAP 12104, RECORDED IN BOOK 168, PAGE 51 OF MAPS

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

AS OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
175-210-032
175-210-034
175-210-062
175-210-063

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines
and dimensions of the applicable
Assessor's Parcel Numbers, refer
to the County Assessor's Map
as of the date of the Report.

AGUA MANSA ROAD
174-210-062
±
175-210-034
175-210-063
175-210-032

SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY

HALL AVENUE

BROWN AVENUE
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Part V – Assessment Rolls

The District’s FY 2023-24 Assessment Rolls are located on the next page.

15 Zone
APN
Assessment
STL 102
173151015-4
$674.04
STL 15
156200042-4
$748.65
STL 17
179040022-9
$166.59
STL 17
179040023-0
$246.02
STL 17
179040024-1
$887.23
STL 17
179040026-3
$608.28
STL 19
178251011-4
$412.28
STL 2-A
156210095-3
$262.58
STL 2-A
156210096-4
$262.58
STL 2-A
156210097-5
$262.58
STL 2-B
171260014-6
$103.77
STL 2-B
171260023-4
$103.77
STL 2-B
171260025-6
$103.77
STL 2-C
174170056-7
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170057-8
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170058-9
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170059-0
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170060-0
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170061-1
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170062-2
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170063-3
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170064-4
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170065-5
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170066-6
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170067-7
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170068-8
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170069-9
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170070-9
$37.58
STL 2-C
174170071-0
$37.58
STL 2-D
156140060-5
$506.54
STL 2-D
156140061-6
$506.54
STL 2-E
175160038-7
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160042-0
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160044-2
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160046-4
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160047-5
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160050-7
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160051-8
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160052-9
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160053-0
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160054-1
$197.19
STL 2-E
175160055-2
$197.19
STL 2-F
169061001-2
$26.67
STL 2-F
169061002-3
$26.67
STL 2-F
169061003-4
$26.67
STL 2-F
169061004-5
$26.67
STL 2-F
169061005-6
$26.67
STL 2-F
169061006-7
$26.67
STL 2-G
175210032-5
$9.20
STL 2-G
175210064-4
$49.02
STL 2-G
175210065-5
$176.88
STL 2-G
175210066-6
$227.51
STL 39
162220017-9
$381.47
STL 41
182311009-9
$422.48
STL 5
167110020-6
$746.72
STL 62
178020026-4
$960.38
STL 69
177250024-6
$2,589.09
STL 7
183112054-1
$376.55
STL 86
170340026-7
$41.11
STL 86
170340031-1
$3,729.92
STL 91
169100053-9
$2,547.79
STL 91
169100059-5
$1,334.08
STL 93
179252015-8
$306.27
STL 93
179252035-6
$287.13
STL 93
179252036-7
$344.56
STL 94
178020033-0
$1,282.09
Note: Tax Roll reflects the updated parcel configuration since budget creation.

Street Lighting Zones
FY
2023-2024
Assessments

Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024

www.WeAreHarris.com
Chris Thomas
Project Manager
Chris [email protected]
P: 619-481-5032

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
D
ATE: JULY 27, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D
P

UBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
(ZONE KK) TO THE CITY OF JURUP A VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED
(THE “DISTRICT”) AND THE LEVY AND COLLEC TION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; SOUTHWEST CORNER

OF AGUA MANSA ROAD AND BROWN AVENUE INTERSECTION
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-69, entitled:

A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRIT ORY ( ZONE KK);

LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AGUA MANSA ROAD AND

BROWN AVENUE INTERSECTION, TO CITY OF JURUPA VA LLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTI NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED, CONFIR MING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,

ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FI SCAL YEAR 202 4-25 PURSUANT TO THE PROV ISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE

CALIFORNIA STREETS A ND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY

ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
BAC

KGROUND
T
he Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), requires the City Council conduct proceedings to annex territory into an assessment district formed under the Act and to levy assessments within such territory.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

In connection with the City’s incorporation in 2011, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No. 12- 10 on July 22, 2010, to establish the Terms and Conditions of Incorporation, which require that the authority and responsibility for special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District be transferred to the City upon its incorporation.

By its Resolution No. 2011-26, adopted on July 1, 2011, the City Council assumed all authority and responsibility for the special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landsca pe Maintenance District and specifically assumed responsibility for any and all special assessments levied in connection with such districts.

The County’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (the “County District”), establish ed pursuant to the provisions of the Act includes various territories located both within the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “City Territory”) and outside the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “County Territory”). Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2016-01 adopted on February 4, 2016, the City declared that the City Territory is a district under the 1972 Act, which is separate and distinct from the County Territory, and designated such territory as the “Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated.”

At its June 1, 2023 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023- 37 initiating proceedings for the annexation of territory to the Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (the “District”) as Zone KK and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory. The territory proposed to be annexed includes 2 parcels identified as APNs 175 -210-035 and 175-210-037, generally located at the southwest corner of Agua Mansa Road and Brown Avenue intersection.

Further, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-39 declaring its intention to annex territory to the District and to levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2024-2025. Resolution No. 2023-39 set July 20, 2023 as the public hearing date for protests to the levy of annual assessments and the annexation.

Subsequent to the June 1, 2023 meeting and in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, notice was mailed to the owners of the properties within the territory to be annexed, along with an assessment ballot for such owners to indicate support for, or opposition to, the proposed annexation. The notice indicated the amount of the proposed assessment for their respective parcels and the date, time and place of the public hearing.

ANALYSIS

It is proposed to include the additional parcels within the boundaries of the District and to levy assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2024-2025. Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection.

Page | 3

At the public hearing, the City Council must hear and consider all oral and written statements, protests, objections or other communications made or filed with respect to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments within such territory.

The assessment ballots must be tabulated at the public hearing. A majority protest exists if ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment and annexation exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment and annexation. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may adopt a resolution ordering the annexation and levy and collection of assessments within the territory.

OTHER INFORMATION

• City Council initiated proceedings for the annexation on June 1, 2023.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment.

The City will file the special assessment with the County Auditor-Controller for collection via the annual property tax bills . The property owners have posted a deposit with their application to form Zone KK in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the annexation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability for the Zone KK. The City’s cost to administer Zone KK annually will be reimbursed through the special assessment charged to property owners.

The fiscal year 2024-2025 (base year) maximum assessment for landscape maintenance and street lighting for the Zone is $18,491 .00 and it will be apportioned based on the number of assessable acres of each benefiting parcel within the zone boundary. The special assessment is subject to escalation beginning in FY 202 5-2026 to account for reasonable increase cost for maintenance and inflation.

The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the services provided in Zone KK as identified on the Engineer’s Report . Both the revenue and expenses wi ll be part of the City’s FY 2024-2025 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023- 69 ordering annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2024-2025.

Page | 4

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-69

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY (ZONE KK); LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER

OF AGUA MANSA ROAD AND BROWN AVENUE INTERSECTION, TO

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING

A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS

AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 202 4-25 PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE

XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley initiated proceedings for the annexation of territory to City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (hereinafter referred to as the "District") and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory for the 2024-2025 fiscal year and caused to be prepared a written report (the "Engineer's Report") in accordance with the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 2. Following notice duly given in accordance with law, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the Engineer's Report, the annexation of territory to the District, and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment within such territory for fiscal year 2024-2025. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The City Council considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons and tabulated all ballots. The City Council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment against lots or parcels of property within the annexed territory for fiscal year 2024-2025 are hereby overruled by the City Council.

Section 3. The City Council hereby orders the annexation of territory, which is described as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 175-210-035 and 171-210-037 to the District. The District will continue to be designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated.

Section 4. Based upon its review of the Engineer's Report and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the annexed territory will be -2-
benefited by the improvements as described in such Engineer 's Report, (ii) the annexed territory includes all of the lands so benefited , (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the annexed territory for the 2024-2025 fiscal year, in accordance with the Engineer's Report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements; and (iv) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

Section 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as follows: The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right -of-way parkway landscaped area on Agua Mansa Road and Brown Avenue, as identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone KK; the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris; the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; and, the operation and maintenance cost of streetlights located within the public right-of-way on Agua Mansa Road and on Brown Avenue, as identified on the approved Streetlight Plans IP21-002 for Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park development and related to this Zone KK; the operation and maintenance cost and/or servicing of any of the foregoing.

Section 6. Lots or parcels of land within the annexed territory that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements.

Section 7. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment, with respect to the annexed parcels, as originally proposed in the Engineer's Report and as revised by the diagram, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

Section 8. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Section 9. The assessment is levied without regard to property valuation.

Section 10. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 5 above for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2024 and ending on June 30, 2025.

Section 11. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025.

Section 12. The improvements shall be performed pursuant to law. -3-
Section 13. The County Auditor of Riverside County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of the assessment and such assessments shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Administrative Services Director.

Section 14. The Administrative Director shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund known as "City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C Zone KK" and such moneys shall be expended only for the improvements described in Section 5 above.

Section 15. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption.

Section 16. A certified copy of the diagram and assessment shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 27th day of July, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-69 was duly passed and adopted at a n adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 27th day of Ju ly, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 27th day of July, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit A

Engineer’s Report
0 | P a g e

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 June 2023

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE KK

BROWN AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE ..................................................................................................... 6 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE KK ............ 7 LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 7 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 8 PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 9 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 9 COST ESTIMATE ....................................................................................................................................... 10 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.............................................................................................................. 12 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 13

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF BROWN AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1- CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) AS ZONE KK TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

Pursuant to the direction from the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (“City Council”), California, this Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is prepared and hereby submitted for the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) in compliance with the provisions of Section 22565 through 22574 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), said Act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

This Report provides for the annexation of the development known as Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park to City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89 -1-C as ZONE KK and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 (2024-2025) and continuing in all subsequent Fiscal Years, for this area to be known and designated as:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE KK

BROWN AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK
I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefor and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the 1972 Act, do hereby submit the following:

Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The separate numbers given the subdiv isions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessor Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
3 | P a g e

As of the date of this Report, there are no parcels or lots within ZONE KK that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

June 1st, 2023.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For pa rticulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein. On this 1st day of June, 2023 the City Council, City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, ordering the preparation of the Report pro viding for th e annexation of the development known as Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park to L&LMD No. 89-1-C as ZONE KK did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2023-38 for a special assessment district zone known and designated as:

ZONE KK

BROWN AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK
The annexation of ZONE KK includes the parcels of land within the industrial center known as Brown Ave nue Trailer Storage Park. As of the date of this report, the zone contains two(2) assessable parcels; also identified by the Assessor Parcel Number(s) 175-210-035 and 175 -210- 037 . As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The following report presents the e ngineering analysis for the annexation of ZONE KK and the establishment of the Maximum Assessment to be levied and collected commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and all subsequent fiscal years.

DEFINITIONS
Agency – Means the local government, City of Jurupa Valley.

Capital cost – Means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by the Agency.

District – Means an area determined by the Agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement of property-related service.

Maintenance and operation expenses - Means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.

5 | P a g e

Ad Valorem Reduction – The corresponding general benefit value of the improvements.

Special benefit – Means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

6 | P a g e

PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT

LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE

ZONE KK shall consist of a benefit zone encompassing the properties within the industrial development known as Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park . The proposed improvements described in this Report are based on current development and improvement plans provided as of the date of this Report.

ZONE KK is generally located on the southwest corner of Brown Avenue and Agua Mansa Road intersection, in the City of Jurupa Valley, in the County of Riverside, State of California. At the time of this assessment, the assessment zone consists of 2 assessable (legal) parcels and zero non-assessable parcels.

ZONE KK consists of all lots/units, parcels, and subdivisions of land located in the following development area:

Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park – Assessor Parcel Numbers as of date of this Report: 175-210-035 and 175-210-037

7 | P a g e

PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE KK

The services to be funded by City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE KK include the landscape and streetlight maintenance related to the industrial development designated as Brown Ave nue Trailer Storage Park. The p roposed improvements, the associated costs, and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on:
a. Level of Service
b. Improvement Types
c. Proximity to Improvement
d. Levels of Special Benefit from Zone (on Public versus Private) The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lot(s) or parcel(s) of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than by assessed value.

It was determined that the improvements identified by this report wi ll directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within ZONE KK. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct , operate, and maintain landscape and lighting improvements within the existing district as well as provide for annual maintenance of those improvements and the assessment revenues generated by the Zone will be used solely for such purpose.

LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for l andscaping servicing and maintenance on public right -of-way (Brown Avenue and Agua Mansa Road) and as approved by the City during the Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park development approval. The following apply:

1. Servicing: the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements.

2. Maintenance: the furnishing of se rvices and materials for the ord inary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or repl acement of all of part of landscape improvements. Maintenance shall also include tree trimming for the trees identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for Zone KK.

The benefits associated with landscaping improvements include:

1. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire protection.

2. Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties through well-maintained surrounding and amenities.
8 | P a g e

3. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuation noise.

STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for the operating energy cost and maintenance of the street lights servicing the industrial development, Brown Avenue Trailer Storage Park , as shown in the Street Improvement Plans prepared for the development and approved by the City Engineer.

The benefits associated with streetlight improvements include:

1. Enhanced deterrence of crime such as vandalism and other criminal activities which would reduce damage to improvements or property.

2. Improved visibility to assist police in the protection of property.

3. Improved visibility for egress from and ingress to the property.

There are twenty-three streetlights considered for this assessment. The three (3) streetlights along the south side of Brown Avenue and one (1) along the west side of Agua Mansa Road. 9 | P a g e

PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the Zone KK to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

The landscaping and streetlighting improvements included on this assessment for Zone KK provide direct and special benefit to the lots or parcels within the Zone. Therefore, the maintenance of these improvements also provides direct and special benefit by maintaining the functionality of the improvements and allowing the improvements to operate in a proper manner.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all (any) industrial parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the maintenance and servicing of landscaping and streetlight are apportioned on a per acre basis.

The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the Zone and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. A portion of the total maintenance costs for the landscaping and streetlights, if any, associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the Zone, but will be paid from other City of Jurupa Valley funds.

No property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property. Additionally, because the benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use (industrial), it is determined that each of the parcels within the Zone benefit equally form the improvements. Therefore, the proportionate share of the costs and expenses for the provisions of landscaping, as well as costs and expenses for the maintenance of the landscaping, are apportioned equally on a per acre basis.

MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The following methodology was adopted by City Council in Resolution No. 2016 -01 dated February 4, 2016. Such methodology has been maintained in preparation of this Report. The purpose of establishing a Maximum Assessment formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustments to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which would add to the Zone KK costs and assessments.

The Maximum Assessment formula shall be applied to all assessable parcels of land within the Zone. For Zone KK, the initial Maximum Assessment(s) for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 are as follows:

1. The initial Total Maximum Assessment established within Zone KK shall be $18,491.00

2. The initial Maximum Assessment per assessable acre shall be $3,393.00 The initial Maximum Assessment is subject to an annual inflator starting in Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative 10 | P a g e

percentage increase in the CPI -U Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario.

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of Zone KK’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. The proposed annual assessment (rate per assessable parcel) applied in any fiscal year is not considered to be an increased assessment if less than or equal to the Maximum Assessment amount. In no case shall the annual assessment exceed the Maximum Assessment.

Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual Zone KK assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish reasonable limits on Zone KK assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase of the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessments for the fiscal year require an increase and the increase is more than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, it is considered an increased assessment.

To impose a n increase assessment, the City of Jurupa Valley must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owner through the balloting process must approve the proposed assessment increase. If the proposed assessment is approved, then a new Maximum Assessment is established for Zone KK. If the proposed assessment is not app roved, the City may not levy an assessment greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment previously established for Zone KK.

COST ESTIMATE
The Ad Valorem reduction is the corresponding general benefit value of the improvements, and it is determined by iden tifying the general public benefit from the installation and upkeep of the improvements identified on this report. All proposed landscape and lighting improvements contained within this report and shown on the development plans are located directly in front of the assessed zone and the construction and installation of the improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the Zone. Therefore, it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is inci dental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the one or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for these improvements is zero.

The Assessment for Zone KK is calculated by dividing the total Annual Balance to Levy minus the Ad Valorem Reduction by the total number of assessable acres within ZONE KK to determine the Annual Assessment per assessable acre. In order to determine the assessment for each assessable parcel, the per acre assessment is multiplied by the parcel acreage.

𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑦 − 𝐴𝑑 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑅𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠 = 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒 The Annual Balance to Levy is the Total Annual Landscaping Costs plus the Total Annual Streetlight Costs as seen in the following summary table:
11 | P a g e

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE KK

BROWN AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK
FY 2024-2025
Total Assessable Acres: 5.45 acres Total Assessable Parcels 2 Cost Description *Total Cost for

ZONE KK
Cost per Acre
for ZONE KK
Landscaping:

Annual Landscaping Maintenance: $4,232.00 $776.51
Tree Trimming : $3,680.00 $675.23
Water (including water meter) $2,745.00 $503.67
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 $40.37
Electricity (including electric meter) $500.00 $91.74
Mulch : $426.00 $78.17
Calsense Single: $250.00 $45.87
Backflow Certificate : $50.00 $9.17
Repairs & Replacements (15%) $1,959.00 $359.45
TOTAL ANNUAL LANDSCAPING COSTS : $13,917.02 $2,553.58

Streetlighting:

Streetlights LED (Brown Avenue): $506.00 $92.84
Streetlights LED (Agua Mansa Road): $611.00 $112.11
Streetlights Repairs & Maintenance (7%) $79.00
TOTAL ANNUAL STREETLIGHTING COSTS (Plus Repairs and
Maintenance) :
$1,196.00 $219.45

ADMINISTRATION (8%) $1,202.65 $220.67
INSPECTION (5%) $751.65 $137.92
OPERATING RESERVE, REPARIS AND REPLACEMENTS (10%) $1,503.31 $275.84

TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT: *$18,491.00 *$3,393.00
*Rounded up to nearest dollar
INITIAL MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER ASSESSABLE ACRE : $3,393.00

12 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
(See next page)

14 | P a g e

15 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

Parcel identification for each parcel within Zone KK shall be the parcels as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps.

ZONE KK includes the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) as of the date of this Report: 175-210- 035 and 175-210-037.

The assessment to be levied upon each parcel that benefits from the annexation of ZONE KK to L&LMD No. 89-1-C will be $3,393 per acre for fiscal year 202 4-25. As stated in this Report, the total budget for ZONE KK for the fiscal year 202 4-25 is $18,491. The initial Maximum Assessments per assessable parcel for ZONE KK are as follows:

APN

Approximate
Assessable
Acreage
Assessment Per Acre Maximum
Assessment
FY24-25
175-210-037 2.61 $3,393.00 $8,855.73
175-210-035 2.84 $3,393.00 $9,636.12

The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted annually by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI -U for All Items Index published by the BLS for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area.

P age | 1

STAFF REPORT
D
ATE: JULY 27, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.E

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT BATCH:
(1) MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 21245: GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 21006, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. CZ21008, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 21083,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38697, VARIANCE NO. 23004, AND

ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR 66
TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF

CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINAR ES
AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028); (APPLICANT: REXCO REAL

ESTATE DEVELOPMENT)
(2) PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION (RHNA): 1) GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS (GPA23005, GPA23006,
GPA23007, GPA23008); 2) ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS (CZ23008, CZ23009, CZ23010, CZ23011); AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A

CERTIFIED PROGRAMMATIC FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RE

COMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and; 2) Receive staff reports and take action on each project .

A. FO R MA21245 SERRANO OAKS:

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

i. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023- 70, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE EAST

SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND
LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028)
ii. Conduct a first reading and Introduce Ordinance No. 2023- 11, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21008
TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE

EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE
AND LINARES AVENUE (APNS: 163 -400-029; 026 & 028) FROM I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO R- 3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES
iii. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-71, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING (1) SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. 21083, (2) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO.
38697, (3) VARIANCE NO. 23004, AND (4) AMENDMENT TO THE

MISSION DE ANZA SPECI FIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN
HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163 -400-
029; 026 & 028)
B. FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH
THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION (RHNA):
i. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023- 72, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE

CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
JURUPA VALLEY GENERAL PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH (1)
GPA23005 AND CZ23008 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165-080-005

FROM COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (LDR) TO HIGHEST

DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HHDR) AND CHANGE THE ZONING

FROM RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE (R- A) TO GENERAL
RESIDENTIAL (R-3), GPA23006 AND CZ23009 TO CHANGE THE
Page | 3

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF
APNS 165-140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 AND 165- 140-007

FROM COMMERCIAL RETAIL (CR) TO HHDR AND CHANGE THE

ZONING FROM SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-P-S) TO R-
3, AND GPA23007 AND CZ23010 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165 -
140-008 FROM CR TO HHDR AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM
C-1/C-P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO R -3 FOR SIX PARCELS
TOTALING 15.8 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH
STREET; AND (2) GPA 23008 AND CZ 23011 TO CHANGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM BUSINESS

PARK (BP) TO HHDR AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM
MANUFACTURING-SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M-SC) TO R-3 FOR
A PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES

LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND

SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA

MARKETPLACE
ii. Conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023- 12, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY ADOPTING (1) CZ23008 TO CHANGE THE

ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE (R- A) TO
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R -3) FOR A PORTION OF APN 165 -
080-005, CZ23009 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM SCENIC
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-P- S) TO R -3 FOR PORTIONS OF
APNS 165-140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 AND 165-140-007, AND CZ23010 TO CHANGE TH E ZONING FROM C -1/C-P
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO R- 3 FOR A PORTION OF APN
165-140-008 FOR SIX PARCELS TOTALING 15.8 ACRES

LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD
AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH STREET; AND (2)
CZ23011 TO CHANGE TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM
MANUFACTURING-SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M-SC) TO R-3 FOR
A PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES

LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND

SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA

MARKETPLACE
C. FOR MA21245 SERRANO OAKS AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO

ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS
ALLOCATION (RHNA):
i. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023- 73, entitled:

Page | 4

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING (1) GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 21006 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE

DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) TO

VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VHDR) AND REMOVING

THE MISSION DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN

OVERLAY FROM THESE PARCELS TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN
HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163 -400-
029; 026 & 028), AND (2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
23005 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165 -080-005 FROM

COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (LDR) TO HIGHEST DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (HHDR), GPA23006 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF APNS 165 -
140-004, 165- 140-029, 165 -140-030 AND 165- 140-007 FROM COMMERCIAL RETAIL (CR) TO HHDR, AND GPA23007 TO

CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A
PORTION OF APN 165 -140-008 FROM CR TO HHDR FOR SIX
PARCELS TOTALING 15.8 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY

EAST OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY
ROAD AT 58TH STREET; AND (3) GPA 23008 TO CHANGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM BUSINESS
PARK (BP) TO HHDR FOR A PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042
TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF

BALDWIN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE

DE ANZA MARKETPLACE

BACKGROUND
Government Code section 65358(b) states that “Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (c) or (d), no mandatory element of a general plan shall be amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year. Subject to that limitation, an amendment may be made at any time, as determined by the legislative body. Each amendment may include more than one change to the general plan.” Due to the amount of project applications and advance planning efforts the City has undertaken that would require General Plan Amendment s, the Community Development Department is “batching” or “grouping” multiple amendments to comply with the limitation set forth in Government Coe section 65358(b).

OVERVIEW OF PROCESS
Each batch of General Plan Amendment projects are included in a single agenda item for City Council consideration. Each individual project is a sub-item in a single agenda item and will be presented to the City Council individually. There is allotted time for discussion and public participation for each individual project. The City Council will take a preliminary action/vote at the conclusion of each individual project. After all the projects are heard, the City Council will take a final action for the individual projects. The final decision on the Page | 5

General Plan Amendments is contained in one resolution included as Attachment 3.

On May 4, 2023, the City Council took action on the first batch of 2023 General Plan Amendments and approved the following:

A. MA20219 Proposed Mini-Storage Facility (Van Buren Blvd. & Clay St.): A mini- storage facility on 4.73 acres of vacant land (APN: 163- 400-046) located on the east side of Van Buren Blvd. and north of Clay St.

B. Shopping Center at Van Buren Blvd. & Jurupa Rd. Approved a Commercial Retail designation and C-P-S zone for an existing shopping center, located on east of Van Buren Blvd, north of Jurupa Road, and west of Felspar Street.

C. Amendments to Implement the 6 th Cycle Housing Element. Approved amendments to the 1) Zoning Code, 2) General Plan Community Safety, Services and Facilit ies Element; and 3) General Plan Land Use Map, the I -15 Corridor Specific Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map.

This agenda item will cover the second batch of 2023 General Plan Amendments.

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
For this agenda item, there are two projects that include a General Plan Amendment. This section provides a brief summary introducing the projects. Each of the project’s staff report is attached.

A. MA21245 Serrano Oaks (east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue). The applicant, Rexco Real Estate Development , is proposing a residential community consisting of 66 townhomes (13 two -story buildings) on 4.13 acres on the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028). The applications include a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Permit, and a Variance. The recommendation is to approve the entitlements to construct the residential community. The staff report is Attachment 1.

B. Proposed Amendments to ensure Compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). On December 2, 2021, the City Council approved the 6th Cycle General Plan Housing Element which included the identification of 19 sites to be redesignated and rezoned to higher density residential to meet the City’s required Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). However, on January 19, 2023, the City Council approved two projects within Paradise Knolls at densities lower than assumed in the Housing Element which caused the City to fall below its low-income housing RHNA requirement. Per State law, a jurisdiction has up to 180 days from the date of the approval to redesignate/rezone additional sites to accommodate the shortfall. Thus, on April 6, 2023, the City Council initiated General Plan Land Use and Zoning map amendments on portions of Sites 5a and 14a to accommodate the RHNA. The recommendation is to adopt the amendments.

The staff report is Attachment 2.

Page | 7

e. Attachment E: Planning Commission Staff Report from June 28, 2023 (without attachments)
f. Plans (Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan, Architectural Plans, Landscaping, lighting plan, trash enclosure)

2. Staff Report for Proposed Amendments to ensure Compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
a. Resolution No. 2023-72, adopting an addendum to a certified programmatic final Environmental Impact Report and adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
i. Exhibit A. Addendum to Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan Programmatic Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2016021025)
b. Ordinance No. 2023 -12, approving CZ Nos. 2300 8, 23009, 23010 and 23011
i. Exhibit A: Map of CZ23008, CZ23009 & CZ23010
ii. Exhibit B: Map of CZ23011
c. Adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-09
d. 2021-2029 Housing Element Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites e. Correspondence Received from Debi Myers dated May 17, 2023 f. Public Hearing Notice

3. City Council Resolution No. 2023-73 regarding General Plan Amendments. a. Exhibit A: Findings for General Plan Amendment No. 21006 for Serrano Oaks townhome project (MA21245)
i. Attachment A-1: Map for GPA21006
b. Exhibit B: Findings for General Plan Amendment No s. 23005, 23006, 23007 and 23008 to ensure Compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
i. Attachment B-1: Maps for GPA23005, GPA23006, GPA23007 and GPA23008

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JULY 27, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 21245: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21006, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. CZ21008, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 21083,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38697, VARIANCE NO. 23004, AND

ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MO NITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR 66
TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY

STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028); (APPLICANT: REXCO REAL

ESTATE DEVELOPMENT)

RECOMMENDATION

1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and:

A. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-70, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE

EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028)
B. Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 2023-11, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21008 TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY

4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APNS: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) FROM I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES

Page | 2

C. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-71, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING (1) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 21083, (2) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38697, (3) VARIANCE NO. 23004, AND (4)

AMENDMENT TO THE MISSION DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT

THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028)
D. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-73, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING (1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21006 TO CHANGE THE

LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) TO

VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VHDR) AND REMOVING THE MISSION

DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY FROM THESE PARCELS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON

4.13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028), AND (2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 23005 TO CHANGE THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165-080- 005 FROM COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (LDR) TO HIGHEST DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (HHDR), GPA23006 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF APNS 165-140-004, 165-140-029, 165- 140-030 AND 165-140-007 FROM COMMERCIAL RETAIL (CR) TO HHDR, AND GPA23007 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165 -140-008 FROM CR TO HHDR FOR SIX PARCELS TOTALING 15.8 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH STREET; AND (3) GPA 23008 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO HHDR FOR A PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN

AVENUE AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA

MARKETPLACE
NOTE: There will only be one action taken on Resolution No. 2023 -73. The findings for approval of GPA No. 21006 can be found in Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2023-73.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to construct a residential community consisting of 66 townhomes (13 two - story buildings) on 4.13 acres of vacant land located on the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Street (APNs: 163-400-029, 163-400-026, and 163-400-028).

The unit mix would consist of 40 three- (3) bedroom/ two and half- 2.5 bathroom, and 26 four- (4) bedroom/ two and half - 2.5 bathroom units , and the size of each town home

Page | 3

would range in size from 1,437 ft2 to 1,540 ft2. All buildings would be two (2) stories in height. Residents would own the interior of their individual townhouse unit, along with the airspace above, while the exterior of the townhouse buildings and common area would be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association (HOA). The community would include improvements and amenities including a tot lot, 5,800 square foot Community Recreational area, two BBQ/Recreational areas, a 3,500 square foot dog park, parking in the form of two - (2) car garages for residents, private patios for each unit, decorative pedestrian walkways, pedestrian lighting, and decoratively paved entrances. See Exhibit A for the conceptual site plan.

EXHIBIT A – CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

The proposed project would require the following entitlement:

1. General Plan Amendment (GPA):
a. C hange the General Plan land use designation from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to Very High Density Residential (VHDR) to allow for a proposed density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre. The Very High Density Residential land use designation allows for the development of multi-family apartments and condominiums, with a density range between 15 and 20 dwellings per acre.
b. R emove the Specific Plan Overlay to allow for the proposed Serrano Oaks project.

2. Change of Zone (CZ) : Change the zoning from I -P (Industrial Park) to R-3 (General Residential).

3. S pecific Plan Amendment: To remove the Project site from the Mission De Anza Specific Plan to allow for the proposed Serrano Oaks project.

4. T entative Tract Map (TTM): Subdivide existing 4.13-acre project site into 66 new town home lots for townhomes, private streets, and open space.

Page | 4

5. Site Development Permit (SDP): To allow for the construction of the Serrano Oaks project.

6. V ariance : To allow a 5% reduction in the minimum open space requirement. The Planned Residential Development standard requires a minimum of 40% (72,000 square-feet) of total open space for the project and the project proposes 35% (63,409 square-feet).

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA
The Project site is located on the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Street. The immediate surrounding neighborhood is composed of commercial and residential uses. These uses include the Pacifica Senior Living facility to the north, Gold Star Hamburgers drive -thru restaurant to the south, an R -4 single -family residential development (New Haven) with (lot sizes ranging from 3,500 to 6,000 square feet) to the east, and another R -4 single-family residential development (Bayberry and Rock Rose Place) to the west of Clay Street. Bayberry and Rock Rose Place is a 254 single- family residential community with lot sizes ranging from 3,610 to 8,281 square- feet. De Anza Plaza and Spectrum Center are located on Limonite Avenue on Clay Street approximately 1,000 feet to the north of the project site. See Exhibit B for the site location and nearby surrounding projects.

TABLE 1: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL

NUMBER(S)
163-400-029, 163-400-026, 163-400-028

TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT
SITE

4.13 acres
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION CN (Commercial Neighborhood)
GENERAL PLAN OVERLAY 1. Airport Influence Area: Riverside Municipal Airport

2. Specific Plan Overlay
SPECIFIC PLAN Mission De Anza
ZONING CLASSIFICATION I-P (Industrial Park)

Page | 5

EXHIBIT B – SITE LOCATION WITH SURROUNDING PROJECTS

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Architecture, Amenities, and Landscaping
The proposed project would provide for high quality architecture, private amenities, and extensive landscaping that would provide beautification and privacy screening. The project would incorporate a California Mission style architecture. See Exhibit C for proposed architectural elevations. The proposed architecture would be consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley residential style sheets, as it would incorporate: (1) authentic colors to the proposed architectural styles, (2) a mix of materials in transition (stucco, gable accents, concrete tile roofs, decorative pot shelfs, and shutters), (3) private patios, and (4) articulated facades . All buildings would be two (2) stories in height at approximately 29 feet tall.

Page | 6

EXHIBIT C – PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE

The proposed project would include amenities such as private patio for each unit, a tot lot, an approximately 5,800ft 2 Community Recreational Area, a 1,200 square foot BBQ/recreational area, 3,500 square foot dog park, a total of 52 open unassigned parking spaces for visiting guests, and 132 private garage spaces that will be equipped with EV ready infrastructure. See Exhibit D for the site plan and highlighted recreational areas.

The project site would have drought -tolerant landscaping that would both beautify the community, and provide substantial screening from the adjacent residential community to the east. A perimeter wall with trees and landscaping would surround the project site along the north, east, and south. An existing 6 (six) foot -high masonry wall is located along the north and east property lines. The project would include the construction of a six-foot high decorative split-face block wall along the south property line to provide a safe family friendly environment and buffer from the Gold Star Hamburgers site. Townhomes would be facing Clay Street; each unit with an enclosed patio area. See Exhibit C for front elevations. The Project site provides setbacks for buffer on the north, east, and west property lines. The north setback will consist of 15 feet from the existing block wall to the front of the townhomes. East side setback adjacent to the New Haven community will consist of 10 feet from property line to front porch with a total of 20 feet from property line to building. The east side setback will also include a landscaped buffer of trees that will provide further privacy. West side setback from Clay Street to the front porches of each unit will consist of 20 feet.

Page | 7

EXHIBIT D – SITE PLAN & PROPOSED LOCATIONS

OF DOG PARK & RECREATIONAL AREAS

Access, Parking, Right of Way Improvements and Maintenance A. Access to Site . There are two access points on Clay Street that will consist of decorative paving. The northern access point is restricted to right-in and right-out turning movements. It will also serve as an emergency vehicle access . The southern access point provides for full movements.

B. Internal Street. The internal streets are proposed to be private. There is a main circulating street and the garages would be accessed through interior private streets.

C. Parking. Street parking on Clay Street and internal private streets are prohibited.

Residents and guests for Serrano Oaks would park their vehicles in garages and on-site parking spaces. The development would include a total of 52 unassigned parking spaces that can be used by visitors and/or residents.

D. Right of Way Improvements. Improvements will consist of a 6 (six) foot wide landscape planter, repairs to the existing sidewalk, curb, and gutter as needed; existing streetlights will be upgraded to current LED standards.

E. Maintenance. All common area, including internal streets, courts, walkways, amenities, and landscaping within the community , would be privately owned and maintained by the HOA. All streetlights would be owned, operated, and maintained by Southern California Edison (SCE). Clay Street would be publicly owned and maintained through a community facilities district (CFD).

Traffic and Street Improvements
A Transportation Assessment (TA) was completed and reviewed by the City’s Engineering Department for the project. The TA indicated that the project would generate an estimated 445 daily passenger trips, with 26 peak hour trips in the a.m. and 34 peak

Page | 8

hour trips i n the p.m. For comparison, there are about 2,100 projected peak hour trips along Van Buren Boulevard at the Clay St intersection and 800 projected peak hour trips along Clay Street near the project site. These projections include trips generated from recently approved projects, such as the "Bayberry and Rock Rose Place" project. The TA report concluded that the Project’s traffic circulation impact is considered insignificant as it meets the City of Jurupa Valley’s Impact Analysis Guidelines. Furthermore, as part of the City’s environmental review (i.e., Mitigated Negative Declaration), the project was deemed to have “Less than Significant” impacts to the local traffic system.

Although there are no significant traffic impacts, the project will provide a cash- in-lieu payment towards traffic signal interconnect along Clay Street between Linares Avenue and De Anza Marketplace, which will allow the City to better coordinate signal timing in the future, resulting in improved traffic flow. The project will need to provide two bus shelters on Clay Street. The applicant will also need to collaborate with the developer of the nearby Bayberry and Rock Rose Place project on the Clay Street median design. The width of the median will vary from two (2) feet to twelve (12) feet. The median will consist of a left-turn pocket into the project site for vehicles traveling south on Clay. A 100- foot long acceleration lane will be provided for vehicles turning left out of the project site and traveling south on Clay Street. Lastly, a left-turn pocket into Gold Star Hamburgers would be provided for travelers going southbound on Clay Street.

It should be noted that the Bayberry and Rock Rose Place development is also responsible to provide street improvements on Clay Street and Van Buren Boulevard as follows:
• Underground all utility lines
• Construct a 2’ to12’ wide landscape raised median on Clay Street • Install a 21’ parkway along the north section of Clay Street, including a 6-ft meandering sidewalk and landscaping.
• Install a 24’ parkway along south section of Clay Street, including a 10’ decomposed granite multi-purpose trail
• Conduct curb and gutter repairs along frontage of the Bayberry and Rock Rose Place site as directed by City Engineer at time of improvements • Install new streetlights on Clay Street
• Restripe Van Buren Boulevard to provide a third northbound through lane and a third southbound through lane
• Modify existing traffic signal on the corner of Clay Street and Linares Avenue • Pay a cash- in-lieu of construction payment for intersection improvements at Clay Street and Van Buren Boulevard
Furthermore, the City of Jurupa Valley has a programmed C apital Improvement Project to widen Van Buren Boulevard, south of Clay Street from 2 lanes to 3 lanes in each direction, which will alleviate congestion in the future.

Page | 9

ANALYSIS
I. GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION
A. Residential Land Use. The Project will require findings to be made for the amendments to the General Plan and zoning designation. The removal of the project site from the Mission De Anza Specific Plan is being requested to allow multi-family housing at this location.
• The proposal to change the General Plan land use designation from Industrial to Residential will require for the project to meet the following findings under Section 9.30.040:

1. The proposed change does not involve a change in or conflict with: the Riverside County Vision; any General Planning Principle set forth in General Plan Appendix B; or any
Foundation Component designation in the General Plan.

2. The proposed amendment would either contribute to the purposes of the General Plan or, at a minimum, would not be detrimental to them.

II. GENERAL PLAN. The project is consistent with the General Plan with approved entitlements.

A. Land Use Designation . The General Plan land use designation is Commercial Neighborhood (CN) . A General Plan Amendment is proposed in order to change the land use from Commercial Neighborhood to Very High Density Residential (VHDR), which would allow for a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The project is proposing a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre, which demonstrates consistency with the applicable residential section of the Land Use Element, in the General Plan including the following policies:
• LUE 2.2 Higher Density Residential. Accommodate higher density residential development in walkable, pedestrian oriented areas near major transportation corridors, concentrated employment areas, and community and town centers, and promote the development of high quality apartments and condominiums that will encourage local investment and pride of ownership.

The proposed project is for a high quality multi -family community along a primary transportation corridor in Clay Street and in close proximity to two commercial centers, which are the De Anza Plaza and Spectrum Center. The community would also be walkable, ownership based, and is proposed at a density consistent with the Very Highest Density Residential (VHDR) land use designation ( up to 20 dwelling units per acre) in the City’s General Plan.
• LUE 2.3 Infrastructure. Ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the

Page | 10

demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing r esidents and businesses.

All street improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.
• LUE 2.6 Buffering. Require setbacks and other design elements to buffer residential units from the impacts of abutting agricultural, roadway, commercial, and industrial uses, to the maximum extent possible.

The development meets the required setbacks and incorporates design features such as screen walls and dense landscaping to buffer residential units from any potential impacts of abutting uses and roadway.
• LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.

The proposed project successfully incorporates California Mission architectural style that is compatible with the surrounding area. • LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding. Require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as police and fire facilities, parks, streets, and trail improvements.

The applicant would be required to contribute over $413,000 in Impact Fees, which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities. The project is subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. The applicant has agreed to pay an in- lieu fee to meet the requirements, the cost would be $328,797.50 ($2.50 / ft
2).

B. SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY (SPO). The SPO is typically applied to large undeveloped or underdeveloped areas with existing Specific Plans or potential site for Specific Plan. Where the Specific Plan Overlay is placed on a project site, the project site shall not receive new land use or development entitlements until a specific plan has been adopted or amended by the City Council. The project has an SPO and the project includes a Specific Plan Amendment to remove the existing Specific Plan, therefore will require a General Plan Amendment to remove the SPO. The project , as a residential project, would be consistent and compatible with existing uses as the site is surrounded by commercial

Page | 11

and residential uses. The existing Specific Plan allows industrial uses which are not compatible with the existing surrounding uses.

C. FLABOB AND RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL AIRPORTS OVERLAY (FLO).

The project is within the both Flabob and Riverside Municipal Airports Overlay and complies with all of the applicable policies. ALUC has deemed this project compatible with its ALUCP . Recommended Condition No. 29 requires a clearance letter from ALUC to confirm satisfaction of ALUC’s project conditions.

III. MISSION DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLAN. Currently , the project site is within the Mission De Anza Specific Plan. The Specific Plan was adopted in 1973 and consist of 1,058 acres. The Specific Plan i s divided into four l and uses categories: commercial, industrial, regional park, and residential. The project site is within the 9- acre industrial land use planning area and, therefore, a proposed residential is not consistent with the Specific Plan. An amendment to remove this project site is required to allow this proposed project . Residential use, instead of industrial use, is compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses.

IV. TITLE 7 – SUBDIVISIONS. Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38697 complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for the proposed 66 parcels. The Engineering Department has reviewed the Project for required travel lanes, access, circulation, grading, and drainage. The recommended conditions address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality.

V. TITLE 9 – ZONING ORDINANCE. The project site has a zoning classification of Industrial Park (I -P). A change of zone is proposed to change the zoning from Industrial Park (I-P) to General Residential (R -3). R-3 zone allows for a Planned Residential Development (PRD) subject to complying with the PRD standards. The project complies with the PRD standards and applicable Multiple Family Dwellings (Townhomes) development standards.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PROJECT IN
COMPLIANCE?
Map. A subdivision map, prepared
substantially in accordance with the
conditions of approval thereof and the
requirements of this section, shall be
recorded pursuant to Title 7.

Yes. Subdivision map is
substantially in acccordance
with the requirements of this
section.

Density, open areas and height
limitations. Not less than forty (40)
percent of the net area of a project shall
be used for open area or recreational
facilities, or a combination thereof. The
net area of a project shall be determined
Yes, with a variance to
modify the requirement to
35% open space.

Page | 12

by excluding all streets, drives and
automobile storage areas.

The total number of dwelling units in a
project shall not exceed that which would
be permitted if the project were a
standard lot development.

Yes, the project is proposing

15.9 dwelling units per acre
which is below the allowed
density under VHDR.

The height of buildings shall not exceed
35 feet. The maximum permitted density
and height limits may be reduced if it is
determined to be necessary for a planned
development to achieve compatibility with
the area in which the development is
located.

Yes, the project is proposing
a maximum height of 29 feet
which is below the R-3 zone
maximum of 35 feet for
residential zones.

Yard setbacks. Building setbacks from a
project's exterior streets and boundary
lines shall be the same as those
prescribed by the zone in which the
project is located. In no case shall such
building setbacks for any project be less
than those prescribed in the R-3 Zone.

The minimum building setback from
interior drives shall be ten (10) feet.

Yes, the project complies
with setback requirements.

Streets. Streets, which may be permitted
to be private, shall be required in
accordance with the provisions of Title 7.

Yes, the proposed streets
meet the requirements and
Engineering has deemed it
adequate.

Page | 13

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PROJECT IN
COMPLIANCE?
Residential structures. The number of
dwelling units in a building in the R-3
Zone shall not exceed that permitted by
the R-3 Zone development standards.

Residential buildings shall have a
minimum ground floor living area of one
thousand (1,000) square feet and each
dwelling unit in a building shall have the
minimum floor living area required by
Section 9.240.110.
a) Project meets R-3 zone
development standards as
maximum lot coverage is
50% and applicant is
proposing a 35% lot
coverage.
b) Project complies with the
minimum ground floor living
area of one thousand (1,000)
square feet per building.
c) Project meets the
minimum floor living area of
750 square feet per Section

9.240.110. Total living area
proposed is 1,437 and 1,540
square feet.

Recreational buildings. Recreational,
public assembly and similar buildings
may be permitted within a project if they
are intended for the primary use of
persons residing within the project and
are located so as not to be detrimental to
adjacent properties.

Recreational buildings are
not required and are not
being proposed.

Maintenance of common areas. A
community association with the
unqualified right to assess the owners of
the dwelling units for all maintenance,
operational and other costs of the
common areas and facilities and the
community association shall be
established and continuously maintained.

The association shall have the right to
lien the units of the owners who default in
the payment of their assessments. The
association's lien shall not be
subordinate to any encumbrance other
than a deed of trust or mortgage made in
good faith and for value which is of
record prior to the recordation of the lien
of the association. Prior to recordation of
the final subdivision map, the developer
shall submit for approval the declaration
The project satisfies this
standard as an HOA would
be required to be formed for
maintenance of all common
areas. Additionally, the
recommended condition
would require declaration of
covenants, conditions, and
restrictions (CC&R’s) to be
recorded prior to the
recordation of the map.

Page | 14

VI. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) Per Zoning Code Section 9.240.330(3) - Requirements for Approval, no Site Development Permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:

A. “The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinance of the City of Jurupa Valley.” The Project is consistent with the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and applicable State law. The proposed General Plan land use designation is Very High D ensity Residential (VHDR), and the proposed zoning classification is General Residential (R -3). The R-3 zone is consistent of covenants, conditions and restrictions
for the project. The approved declaration
shall be recorded at the time of the
recording of the final subdivision map.

Trash areas. Adequate enclosed trash
pickup areas, convenient to the residents
which they are intended to serve, shall be
provided in the project.

Burrtec has determined that
the enclosed trach
enclosures and pick-up
areas are satisfactory.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PROJECT IN
COMPLIANCE?
A six (6) foot high masonry wall shall be
constructed on any project boundary line
where the adjacent property is zoned for a
lower residential density than that zone in
which the project is located.

The project satisfies this
standard as there are
existing 6 foot high split face
walls along all property lines
that are adjacent to lower
residential density.

Walkways. Five (5) foot wide paved
pedestrian walkways shall be installed
between the dwelling units and the
recreational areas of the project.

Yes, site plan demonstrates
compliance.

Access. Vehicular access openings into a
project shall be limited to one (1) for each
four hundred (400) feet of public street
frontage; however, all projects shall be
permitted two (2) access drives
regardless of the amount of frontage.

Yes, site plan indicates the
location of access points and
demonstrates compliance.

Parking Standards
Project meets parking
standards per Section

9.240.120.

Page | 15

with VHDR. With entitlements, the project will accommodate the proposed 66-unit multi-family residential project. The Project complies with all applicable development standards.

B. “The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the pres ent and logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof.”
The combination of the site design, building design, compliance with all applicable development standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the project is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the logical development of the land use and with the surrounding residential and commercial land uses. Further, the removal of industrial uses to allow residential designations will further transform this area along Clay Street. The proposed use is compatible with commercial uses, schools, and parks, and existing residential use.

C. “All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.”

The proposed site development permit plans do not permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel. A recommended condition prohibits the applicant from selling any constructed structures until the parcel on which the buildings are located is divided and a final map is recorded.

VII. FINDINGS FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE (SECTION 9.240.270) The Planning Commission may approve a Variance based on the following section 9.240.270:
“(1)Variances from the terms of this chapter may be granted when, because of special circumstances applicable to a parcel of property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this

Page | 16

chapter deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity that is under the same zoning classification.

(2)A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property, but shall be limited to modifications of property development standards, such as lot size, lot coverage, yards, and parking and landscape requirements”.

As indicated by the following fac ts, there are unique or special circum stances that exist for the project site:
a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Variance No. 23004 to allow 35% (63,409 square-feet) of open space/recreational areas within the Project site instead of the required 40% (72,000 square- feet) a 5% difference per the Planned Residential Development (PRD) standard. b) Planned Residential Development (PRD) standards allow for flexibility to the minimum required lot size per the R -3 zone. Because of the flexibility on smaller lot sizes, it is difficult for lots to have private open spaces, therefore PRD standards require a minimum of 40% in common open space for the community to enjoy. Although the Project proposes a total of 35% of common open space, it also provides front porch areas for each unit to enjoy with an average square footage of 165 square feet.

This supports granting a variance in the minimum percentage of open space that the Project must provide as each individual unit aside from the overall open space provided has its own patio. Furthermore, in order for the tract to comply with the required standards (such as minimum average lot size, minimum average lot width together with standards for public streets) and being able to create access for services to this tract such as waste management and fire access, it is necessary for the site to have open space less than the required minimum average of 40%.

VIII. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAP.

Per Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, “A tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this ordinance, or if any of the following findings are made:”
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suit able for the proposed density of the development;

Page | 17

5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems;
7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternative easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously ac quired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and
8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmen tal impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible th e mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Tentative Tract Map No. 38697 is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for standards and process.

Furthermore, the City’s Engineering Department has reviewed the project for access, circulation, grading, and drainage and has recommended conditions that would require the project to comply with mandated regulations.

The land is suitable for the proposed residential subdivision. The project will not cause any substantial environmental damage or impacts to wildlife and their habitats with recommended conditions and mitigation measures. The project will not be a danger to the welfare of the general public. The project will n ot cause serious public health problems. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been certified and adopted, and findings have been made pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act. It is recommended for approval.

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The City of Jurupa Valley has prepared and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is supported by an Initial Study that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Ser vices, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. The proposed

Page | 18

Mitigated Negative Declaration determines that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant. The public review period began on June 19, 2023 and ended on June 28, 2023.

Public Comment
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) provided a response letter on June 28, 2023. CDFW submitted a letter expressing concern on some of the Project’s biological mitigation measures. Specifically, concerns with MM- BIO-1 - Burrowing Owl, MM-BIO-3 – Crotch’s Bumble Bee, MM BIO-4 – Nesting Bird, and recommending mitigation for Narrow Endemic Plants. CDFW is recommending updating the MND’s Biological Resources Mitigation Measures to include additional language provided in the response letter. CDFW provided the recommendations to assist the City in developing clear, detailed, and fully enforceable mitigation measures.

The City has included the CDFW comments and responses to these comments. As a result of reviewing CDFW’s comments MM-BIO-1, MM-BIO-3, and MM -BIO-4 have been updated to include the additional language recommended. The updated MMs are more effective at protection of potential biological impacts on the Project site and with the mitigation impacts would continue to be less than significant.

The Biological Assessment found “no suitable habitat ” for Brand ’s phacelia, many stemmed dudleya, or San Miguel savory, and recommended no further surveys. As a result of the Biological Assessment conclusions the recommended mitigation by CDFW for NEP would not be necessary.

The CDFW did not provide comments on MM -BIO-2 Western Yellow Bat, however the MM is still required and will remain as part of the MND and MMRP.

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
Study Session
On April 21, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a Study Session where they received a presentation on a proposed 94,780 square foot, multi -family housing development consisting of 110 apartment units on the 4.13- acre site. During the Study Session, the Planning Commission discussed the need for affordable housing, concerns with rental units instead of for sale units, as well as concerns regarding height of the proposed six detached three-story buildings. The most significant concern expressed by the Planning Commission was related to the density being proposed at the time, which consisted of 26.7 dwelling units per acre.

Public Hearing
Based upon feedback received at the Planning Commission Study Session, the applicant significantly modified the project to include 66 townhomes (13 two-story buildings) for sale on 4.13 acres with a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre. The applicant also responded to the issues of affordable housing by agreeing to pay an affordable housing in-lieu fee of

A-1

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-70

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A

MITIGATED NEGATIVE D ECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING
PROGRAM TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66
TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 AC RES LOCATED AT THE E AST

SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE
AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 & 028)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. Rexco Real Estate Development (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21006, Change of Zone No. 21008, Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, Variance No. 23004, and to amend the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Specific Plan Overlay so it does not apply to the Applicant’s property (collectively, Master Application No. 21245 or MA No. 21245) to permit the construction of 66 townhomes on 4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive an d Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) (the “Project”).

Section 2. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21245 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On June 28, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution PC- 2023-14, on a 3-1 vote (with Commissioner Pruitt absent due to a conflict of interest ), recommending that the City Council approve the Project. (c) On July 20, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportu nity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings and Recommendation for Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
-2-

(a) The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as “CEQA”). (b) Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project. (c) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effect s of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was prepared by the City in full compliance with CEQA.
(d) Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the MND as requ ired by law. The public comment period commenced on June 9, 2023, and expired on June 28, 2023. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. On June 28, 2023, the City received a comment letter from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife recommending that certain mitigation measures be imposed or revised for burrowing owl, nesting bird, crotch’s bumble bee, and narrow endemic plants. Staff prepa red a response to the comments that is incorporated in the Final MND. (e) Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been impo sed to assure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and is incorporated herein by reference.
(f) The City Council has reviewed the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”), attached as Exhibit “A,” and all comments received regarding the Final MND. After due consideration of the Final MND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the City Council hereby finds and resolves that:
1) All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. 2) Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft MND, the Final MND, and on the Project.

The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
3) The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporate d by reference and which includes the Final MND, the written and oral comments on the Draft MND, the Draft MND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony.
-3-

4) The City Council has reviewed the Final MND and all comm ents received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the July 20, 2023 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (i) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (ii) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (iii) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.
(g) Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the MND and MMRP for the Project.
(h) The Community Development Director is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA.

Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 27th day of July, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-70 was duly passed and adopted at a n adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 27th day of July, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 27th date of July, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

A-1

Exhibit A
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

A-1
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-71

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING (1)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 21083, (2) TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38697, (3) VARIANCE NO. 23004,
AND (4) AMENDMENT TO THE MISSION DE ANZA

SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALL OW FOR THE CONSTRUCT ION
OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4 .13 ACRES LOCATED AT THE

EAST SIDE OF CLAY ST REET BETWEEN HAVEN V IEW
DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163-400-029; 026 &
028)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. Rexco Real Estate Development (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21006, Change of Zone No. 21008, Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, Variance No. 23004, and to amend the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Specific Plan Overlay so it does not apply to the Applicant’s property (collectively, Master Application No. 21245 or MA No. 21245) to permit the construction of 66 townhomes on 4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) (the “Project”). Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697 , Variance No. 23004, and the amendment to the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Specific Plan Overlay are the subject matter of this Resolution. Change of Zone No. 21008 will be considered by separate ordinance. General Plan Amendment No. 21006 is the subject matter of a separate resolution.

Section 2. Specific Plan Amendment.
(a) The Applicant seeks to amend the Mission De Anza Specific Plan so that it does not apply to the Project site as shown on Exhibit “A”. (b) Section 9.30.080 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pr ovides that specific plans, and amendments thereto, must be heard and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65450 et seq., as now written or hereafter amended, and in accordance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.30. 100. Further, Government Code Section 65453(a) provides that a specific plan shall be prepared, adopted, and amended in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance and may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body. (c) Section 9.30.100.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that proposals to amend any part of the Jurupa Valley General Plan shall be heard by the Planning Commission during a public hearing on the matter. Further, Government Code Section 65353(a) provides that when a city has a planning commission authorized by local ordinance or resolution to review and recommend action on a proposed general plan, the commission shall hold at least one public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption of a general plan. -2-

(d) Section 9.30.100.(2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation for approval or disapproval within a reasonable time, by resolution, including therein its findings, and transmit it to the City Council with a copy mailed to the applicant. A recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total me mbership of the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission cannot reach a decision within a reasonable time after closing the hearing, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and shall be deemed a recommendation to deny the proposal. Further, Government Code Section 65354 provides that the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption of a general plan, that a recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the commission, and that the Planning Commission shall send its recommendation to the legislative body.
(e) Section 9.30.100.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation of the Planning Commission on an am endment of the General Plan, the City Clerk must set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day and give notice of public hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission. Further, Government Code Section 65355 provides that prior to adopting or amending a general plan, the legislative body shall hold at least one public hearing. Notice of the hearing must be given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090. (f) Section 9.30. 100.(4) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the City Council must render its decision within a reasonable time.

A decision to adopt or amend the General Plan, or any part or element thereof, shall be made by resolution, which resolution shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than the majority of the total membership of the City Council. The City Council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, h owever, that any substantial modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Commission shall first be referred to the Commission for its recommendation. Further, Government Code Section 65356 provides that the legislative body must adopt or amend a general plan by resolution, which resolution shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the legislative body. The legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the planning commission, if any. However, any substantial modification proposed by the legislative body not previously considered by the commission during its hearings, shall first be referred to the planning commission for its recommendation.
(g) Section 9.30.100.(5) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a proposal to adopt or amend any part or element of the General Plan shall not be approved by the City Council until all procedures required by the Jurupa Valley CEQA implemen ting procedures to approve a matter have been completed.

Section 3. Site Development Permit.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Site Development Permit No. 21083 to develop 4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) with 66 townhomes. -3-

(b) Section 9.80.020(A)(10) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that planned residential developments are permitted in the R-3 Residential Zone provided a Site Development Permit is approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(c) Section 9.240.330.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that no site development permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
1) The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley.
2) The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. 3) All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter

1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.
(d) Section 9.240.330.(4)(d)(i) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a site development permit application that requires the approval of a general plan amendment, a specific plan amendment, or a change of zone shall be heard in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.285.040, as discussed in Paragraphs (b)-(d) of Section 3 of this Resolution, and all of the procedural requirements and rights of appeal as set forth therein shall govern the hearing. (e) Section 9.05.110 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that notwithstanding any other provisions of this title, in the event that a project requires a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, development agreement or other legislative action in addition to the tentative subdivision map, site development permit, conditional use permit, variance or other quasi -judicial land use applications for the project, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council to approve, modify or deny the applications for the legislative action for the project and a recommendation to the City Council to approve, conditionally approve or deny the quasi-judicial land use applications. The Council shall hear the applications for the legislative actions along with the applicable procedures of Section

9.05.100. The decision of the City Council shall be made by ordinance or resolution as required by law and shall require three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. The purpose of this section is to enable the City Council to hear and decide all of the land use entitlements for a project in a comprehensive and coordinated manner.
-4-

Section 4. Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38697 a Schedule “A” subdivision to subdivide approximately 4.13 acres into 66 townhomes on the real property located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View and Linares Avenue (APNs:
163-400-029; 026 & 028).
(b) Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(c) Section 7.15.150 of the Jurupa Vall ey Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is the advisory agency authorized to directly approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative maps.
(d) Section 7.15.130.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that within fifty (50) days after the date of filing of a commercial parcel map, a public hearing on the map must be held before the Planning Commission. Section 7.15.130.B. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after the close of the hearing, the Planning Commi ssion must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the proposed tentative map, file notice of the decision with the City Clerk, and mail notice of the decision to the land divider, or his or her authorized agent, and any interested party requesting a copy. (e) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a Tentative Tract Map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
-5-

6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the propos ed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. (f) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Sectio n 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 5. Variance.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Variance No. 23004 to allow 35% (63,409 square-feet) of open space/recreational areas within the Project site instead of the required 40% (72,000 square-feet) per the Planned Residential Development (PRD) standard. (b) Section 9.240.270(A)(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that variances from the terms of Chapter 9.240 may be granted when, because of special circumstances applicable to a parcel of property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this chapter deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity that is under the same zoning classification. (c) Section 9.240.270(A)(2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which auth orizes a use or activity that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property, but shall be limited to modifications of property development standards, such as lot size, lot coverage, yards, and parking and landscape requirements.
(d) Section 9.240.270(C) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code states that a public hearing shall be held on all variance applications in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.240.250, and all the procedural requirements and rights of appeal as set forth therein shall govern the hearing. All public hearings on variances which require approval of a permit or land division shall be heard by the hearing body which has jurisdiction of the principal application.

All public hearings on variances which do not require approval of a permit or land division shall be heard by the Planning Commission.
(e) Section 9.240.270(D) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code states that any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as are necessary so th at the adjustment does not constitute a grant of special privileges that is inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated, and which are necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. -6-

Section 6. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21245 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On June 28, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution PC- 2-23-14 on a 3 -1 vote (with Commissioner Pruitt absent due to a conflict of inter est) recommending that the City Council approve the Project. (c) On July 20, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 7. California Environmental Quality Act Findings and Recommendation for Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley make s the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in the Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was prepared by the City i n full compliance with CEQA.
(b) On July 20, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -70 adopting the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) for the Project. Resolution No. 2023-70 is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

Section 8. Findings for Approval of Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley find s and determines that an amendment to the Mission De Anza Specific Plan should be approved because:
(a) The Project site is part of the Mission De Anza Specific Plan. The Project site is within the 9 -acre industrial land use classification of the Specific Plan. The Applicant is proposing to construct 66 multi-family townhomes with a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre, which is a residential use th at is not consistent with the industrial land use designated in the Specific Plan. In order for compatibility with the surrounding uses and the logical development of future uses, the Specific Plan should be amended so that it does not apply to the Projec t site. -7-

The removal of the Mission De Anza Specific Plan from the Project site will further transform this area from future light industrial uses to a residential community that is proximate to commercial uses, schools, and parks, and will be more compatible with the existing residential uses along the west and east side of Clay Street. Furthermore, an assisted living facility is abutting the project site to the north.

Section 9. Findings for Approval of Site Development Permit. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that Site Development Permit No. 21083 should be approved because:
1) The proposed use will conform to all the requirements of the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan and the Very High Density Residential (VHDR) land use designation, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 210 06. The proposed General Plan land use designation is Very High Density Residential (VHDR), and the proposed zoning classification is General Residential (R-3). The approval of the General Plan Amendment and the Change of Zone will accommodate the proposed 66 -unit, 15.9 unit per acre multi -family residential project. The Project complies with all applicable development standards within the Planned Residential Development (PRD) except for minimum open space percentage, which will require a variance. 2) The combin ation of the site design, building design, compliance with all applicable development standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the Project as designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the logical development of the land use and with the surrounding residential and commercial land uses. Further, the change to residential designations will further transform this area along Clay Street, from light industrial uses to a residential community that is proximate to commercial uses, schools, and parks, and will be more compatible with the existing residential use along the west side of Clay Street, Rock Rose and Bayberry Place.

Furthermore, the Project is compatible with the abutting assisted living facility to the north of the project.
3) The proposed site development permit plans do not permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel. A recommended condition would prohibit the applicant from selling any constructed structures until the parcel on which the buildings are located is divided and a final map is recorded.

Section 10. Findings for Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38697 . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that Tentative Tract Map No. 38697 should be approved because:
1) The proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans because upon the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment, the Project site will allow for a multi-family residential development at a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The Project proposes a 66 unit town home development a density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre.
2) The design or improvement of the proposed land divisio n is consistent with applicable general and specific plans because proposed Project meets all Planned -8-

Residential Development standards such as: 1) Streets; 2) Residential Structures; 3)Maintenance of Common Areas; 4) Walkways; and 5)Access.
3) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development because it is a relatively flat, undeveloped, vacant lot in close proximity to other residential land uses located to the east as well as future upcoming residential uses located to the west of Clay Street. The Project site is suitable to accommodate the subdivision and future development of sixty-six (66) townhomes as there is adequate public services available to the site. 4) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development because it proposes sixty-six (66) townhomes at a density of

15.9 dwelling units per acre, which is at the minimum allowed density under the General Plan land use designation.
5) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the degraded site conditions and absence of plant communities provide an overall low potential for most species to utilize or reside on-site. Therefore, the Project would not be expected to directly impact federal or state-listed threatened or endangered species. 6) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because an Initial Study was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. An MND prepared for the proposed Project determined that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant. The Initial Study determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment. As such, the proposed Project will not cause serious public health problems. 7) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division because there are no easements on Project site that the development would be in conflict with. The proposed Project will connect to existing water and sewer lines located within Clay Street and Van Buren Boulevard and all proposed utilities will be required to be undergrounded.

Section 11. Findings for Approval of Variance No. 23004 . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that Variance No. 23004 should be approved because:
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Variance No. 23004 to allow 35% (63,409 square-feet) of open space/recreational areas within the Project site instead of the required -9-

40% (72,000 square -feet) a 5 % difference per the Planned Residential Development (PRD) standard.
(b) Planned Residential Development (PRD) standards allow for flexibility to the minimum required lot size per the R -3 zone. Because of the flexibility on smaller lot sizes, it is difficult for lots to have private open spaces, therefore PRD standards require a minimum of 40% in common open space for the community to enjoy. Although the Project proposes a total of 35% of common open space, it also provides front porch area for each unit to enjoy with an average square footage of 165 square feet. This supports granting a variance in the minimum percentage of open space that the Project must provide as each individual unit aside from the overall open space provided has its own patio. Furthermore, in order for the tract to comply with the required standards (such as minimum average lot size, minimum average lot width together with standards for public streets) and being able to create access for services to this tract such as waste management and fire access, it is necessary for the site to have open space less th an the required minimum average of 40%.

Section 12. Approval of Master Application No. 21245 with Conditions. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves Master Application No. 21245 to permit construction of 66 townhomes on 4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028). Master Application No. 21245 includes the following:
(a) A Specific Plan Amendment to remove the subject parcels (APNs: 163-400- 029; 026 & 028) from the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and make other conforming changes to the Specific Plan as depicted in Exhibit “A.”
(b) Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 3869 7, and Variance No. 23004 to permit construction of 66 townhomes on 4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028), subject to the recommended conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” (c) The City Council’s approval of Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, and Variance No. 23004 shall not be effective unless General Plan Amendment No. 21006 is adopted and shall not become effective until the effective date of the ordinance adopting Change of Zone No. 21008 to rezone the subject parcels (APNs: 163 -400-029; 026 & 028) from I -P (Industrial Park) to R -3 (General Residential).

Section 13. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 27th day of July, 2023.

-10-

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-11-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-71 was duly passed and adopted at a n adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 27th day of July, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 27th date of July, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
Exhibit A
Specific Plan Amendment
B-1
Exhibit B
Conditions of Approval

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JULY 27, 2023

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION (RHNA): 1) GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS (GPA23005, GPA23006,
GPA23007, GPA23008); 2) ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS (CZ23008, CZ23009, CZ23010, CZ23011); AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A

CERTIFIED PROGRAMMATIC FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and:

A. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-72, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTI FIED

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE JURUPA VALLEY
GENERAL PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH (1) GPA23005 AND CZ23008

TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A
PORTION OF APN 165 -080-005 FROM COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD
(LDR) TO HIGHEST DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HHDR) AND CHANGE

THE ZONING FROM RESI DENTIAL AGRICULTURE (R-A) TO
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3), GPA23006 AND CZ23009 TO

CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND U SE DESIGNATION OF
PORTIONS OF APNS 165 -140-004, 165- 140-029, 165- 140-030 AND 165-140-007 FROM COM MERCIAL RETAIL (CR) TO HHDR AND

CHANGE THE ZONING FROM SCENIC HIGHWAY CO MMERCIAL (C-
P-S) TO R -3, AND GPA 23007 AND CZ23010 TO CHANGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN
165-140-008 FROM CR TO HHDR AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM
C-1/C-P (GENERAL COM MERCIAL) TO R -3 FOR SIX PARCELS
TOTALING 15.8 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH
Page | 2

STREET; AND (2) GP A 23008 AND CZ23011 TO CHANGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM BUSINESS PARK
(BP) TO HHDR AND CHA NGE THE ZONING FROM
MANUFACTURING-SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M- SC) TO R -3 FOR A
PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED

IMMEDIATELY EAST OF B ALDWIN AVENUE AND SO UTH OF

LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA MARKETPLACE
B. Introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 2023- 12, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADOPTING (1) CZ23008 TO CHANGE TH E ZONING FRO M

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE (R-A) TO GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R- 3) FOR A PORTION OF APN 165-080-005, CZ23009 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C- P-S) TO R -3
FOR PORTIONS OF APNS 165-140-004, 165- 140-029, 165- 140-030 AND 165-140-007, AND CZ23010 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM C- 1/C-P (GENERAL COMME RCIAL) TO R- 3 FOR A PORTION OF APN 165-140-008 FOR SIX PARCELS TOTALING 15. 8 ACRES LOCATED

IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF
PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH STREET; AND (2) CZ23 011 TO CHANGE

THE ZONING FROM MANUFACTURING-SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M-
SC) TO R -3 FOR A POR TION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63

ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND

SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA MARKETPLACE
C. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-73, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING (1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDM ENT NO. 21006

TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL

NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) TO VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(VHDR) AND REMOVING THE MISSION DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLAN

AND SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY FROM THESE PARCELS TO ALLOW
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNHOMES ON 4.13 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET BETWEEN HAVEN
VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE (APN: 163 -400-029; 026 & 028), AND (2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 23005 TO CHA NGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND US E DESIGNATION OF A P ORTION OF APN 165-080-005 FROM COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (L DR) TO HIGHEST DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HHDR), GPA23006 TO CHANGE THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF APNS
165-140-004, 165 -140-029, 165- 140-030 AND 165- 140-007 FROM COMMERCIAL RETAIL (CR) TO HHDR, AND GPA2 3007 TO CHANGE

THE GENERAL PLAN LAN D USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165-140-008 FROM CR TO HHDR FOR SIX PARCELS TOTALING Page | 3

15.8 ACRES LOCATED I MMEDIATELY EAST OF V AN BU REN
BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT 58TH STREET; AND
(3) GPA 23008 TO CHA NGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

DESIGNATION FROM BUS INESS PARK (BP) TO HHDR FOR A
PORTION OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED

IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND S OUTH OF

LIMONITE AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA MARKETPLACE

NOTE: There will only be one action taken on Resolution No. 2023- 73. The findings for approval of GPA Nos. 23005, 23006, 23007 and 23008 can be found in Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2023-73.

BACKGROUND
The 6th Cycle General Plan Housing Element for the 2021- 2029 planning period was adopted on December 2, 2021 and certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on April 21, 2022 as being fully compliant with State law.

As part of t he Housing Element certification process, the City was required to identify anticipated densities from projects in process as well as vacant and underutilized sites to achieve the City’s RHNA of 4,497 units for the 2021- 2029 planning period. This process resulted in the identification of 19 sites, totaling 70.84 acres, proposed to be redesignated to the Highest Density Residential Density (HHDR) and rezoned to General Residential (R-3) to meet RHNA. These sites are expected to be considered at public hearings of the Planning Commission and City Council later this year or early 2024. Figures 1 and 2, below, illustrate existing HHDR-designated sites in the City and the 19 proposed 6 th Cycle
redesignation and rezone sites. In addition, Attachment D provides additional detail on each 6th Cycle redesignation/rezone site.

Figure 1: Sites Designated Highest Density Residential (HHDR)

Page | 4

Figure 2: 6th Cycle General Plan Redesignation & Rezone Sites

The Housing Element sites inventory included an assumpti on that Planning Area 2 of Paradise Knolls would develop with 300 dwelling units at 28.4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) as specified in the Specific Plan. The units were then broken down into 195 very low-income units and 105 low -income units as provided by State law which allows jurisdictions to use higher density as a proxy for lower income if certain requirements are met. However, on January 19, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and approved two residential projects on Planning Area 2 of Para dise Knolls at densities lower than those identified in the Housing Element. Due to this decrease in density, the City is now in deficit of its low-income housing RHNA obligation as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 – 6
th Cycle RHNA with Paradise Knolls Reduction
Income Levels
Total
(du)
Very Low
(du)
Low (du) Moderate
(du)
Above
Moderate
(du)
2021-2029 RHNA 1,207 749 731 1,810 4,497
Housing Element
RHNA Surplus with 19
Redesignation/Zone
Change Sites
+250 +65 +362 +1,174 +1,850
Paradise Knolls
Planning Area 2
Modification
-195 -105 +153
Revised RHNA
Surplus/Deficit
+55 -40 +362 +1,327

Page | 5

Based on the RHNA deficit of 40 dwelling units in the low-income category, the City needs to redesignate a minimum of 6.6 acres of additional property to HHDR and rezone to R - 3 to make up for the shortfall. The 6.6- acre number is the amount of land needed to theoretically produce 40 units of low -income housing based on a net density of 17.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and a 65%/35% split between very low and low -income housing. However, HCD recommends that an additional 15-30% of the RHNA obligation be included to provide a buffer in the event that other development proposals fall short of expectations. This would result in a revised total of 7.6 to 8.6 acres of land needed to be redesignated to HHDR.

Per the State’s “No Net Loss” law (Government Code Section 65863), if the approval of a project at a lower density results in the remaining sites becoming inadequate to accommodate the RHNA by income category, the juri sdiction has up to 180 days from the date of the approval to redesignate/rezone additional sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA. Given the approval of the two Paradise Knolls projects on January 19, 2023, the City must take action to redesignate additional land to make up the shortfall as close to July 18, 2023 as possible. The City must report its actions in the Annual Progress Report (APR) due to HCD on April 1
st of each year but does not need to revise the
Housing Element or otherwise report its actions to HCD. In addition, although HCD does not proactively monitor the status of the City’s RHNA, if a report of a deficit is made to the State, HCD will investigate and has the ability to decertify the Housing Element if they believe that proactive measures to remedy the situation are not being taken.

At the March 16, 2023 and April 6, 2023 City Council meetings, the City Council reviewed fifteen sites for potential redesignation to HHDR and rezone to R-3 to make up the RHNA shortfall. In addition, the City Council heard public testimony on the sites, much of which centered on whether to avoid sites located in the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay (ELO) of the General Plan. Following City Council discussion, the City Council initiated General Plan Land Use and Zoning map amendments on portions of Sites 5a and 14a.

In addition, the City Council requested additional information regarding Site 15a. The location of Sites 5a, 14a and 15a are illustrated on Figure 3, below.

ANALYSIS
The following paragraphs discuss the proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning map amendments on portions of Sites 5a and 14a and provide additional information regarding Site 15a.

1. Site 5a (GPA23005, GPA23006, GPA23007, CZ23008, CZ23009 & CZ23010) Site 5a includes six parcels of land consisting of 21.21 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58 th Street. The site is
primarily vacant but contains a f ew single-family residences and outbuildings. The northernmost parcel is designated Country Neighborhood (LDR), zoned Residential Agriculture (R-A), and is located within the ELO. The five southernmost parcels are designated Commercial Retail (CR), zoned General Commercial (C -1/C-P) or Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S), and are located outside the ELO. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and single- family residences to the east, the Jurupa Valley/Pedley transit station to the south, Van Buren Boulevar d, single -family residences and vacant land to the west, and a plant nursery to the north (Figure 4).

Page | 6

Figure 3: Sites 5a, 14a and 15a

Figure 4 – Site 5a - Aerial Photograph

During the City Council meeting of April 6, 2023, the Council discussed the location of Site 5a and its proximity to the Jurupa Valley/Pedley transit station to the south and determined it would be an appropriate location for increased residential density

Page | 7

which would be supportive of transit. The Council also discussed the location of the site within the area being studied for the Pedley Master Plan and expressed a desire not to conflict with the future outcomes of that study. As such, the Council directed that a General Plan Land Use map amendment to HHDR and a Zoning map amendment to R-3 be initiated for the western portions of each parcel with the areas adjacent to Pedley Road to remain unchanged, pending the results of the Pedley Master Plan.

Figure 5 below outlines the proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning map amendments for Site 5a. The actions would change the western portions of each parcel to HHDR and R-3 (approximately 15.8 acres) and would maintain the existing General Plan and Zoning designations within approximately 150 feet of Pedley Road. The area has been divided into three separate general plan amendments and rezones as the current zoning of each area is different.

Figure 5 – Site 5a - Proposed General Plan Amendments and Rezones

Page | 8

In most cases, a developer would be required to obtain a land use entitlement permit that is subject to approval either by a Director’s action, Planning Commission action, or City Council action. In some cases, such as a project that meets State eligibility criteria for income-restricted proposals, no entitlement would be required. However, all developers would be required to submit plans and supporting documentation in accordance with City zoning requirements.

Table 2 below summarizes the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for the identified portions of Site 5a, the potential dwelling unit yield if these areas are redesignated to HHDR and rezoned to R-3, and whether the parcels are within or outside the ELO.

Table 2 – Site 5a - Existing and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designations

2. Site 14a (GPA23008 & CZ23011)
Site 14a includes one parcel of land consisting of 4.0 acres located immediately east of Baldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace. The site includes a graded area and paved driveway and parking areas. The site is

APN

Approx.

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
GPA23005 & CZ23008
165-080-
005
(portion)

4.62 LDR R-A HHDR R-3 52 28 80 In
GPA23006 & CZ23009
165-140-
004
(portion)

0.38 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 5 2 7 Out
165-140-
029
(portion)

3.51 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 40 21 61 Out
165-140-
030
(portion)

1.57 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 18 9 27 Out
165-140-
007
(portion)

1.56 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 18 9 27 Out
GPA23007 & CZ23010
165-140-
008
(portion)

4.16 CR C-1/
C-P
HHDR R-3 47 26 73 Out
Total Site
5a:

15.8 180 95 275
Page | 9

currently designated Business Park (BP) and is zoned Manufacturing -Service Commercial (M-SC).

Surrounding land uses include commercial uses, a parking lot and the vacant Albertson’s building to the north and east, vacant land to the south and Baldwin Avenue and mixed residential, commercial, and industrial land uses to the west (Figure 6).

During the City Council meeting of April 6, 2023, the Council discussed the potential for residential uses on Site 14a. The site is appropriate for residential uses in that it is in an underutilized site near supportive retail uses. In addition, conversion of the site to residential would not impede or restrict commercial uses in the De Anza Marketplace or the potential future use of the Albertson’s building. As such, the City Council directed that a general plan redesignation to HHDR and a rezone to R-3 be brought forward for that portion of the parcel located south of the driveway from Baldwin Avenue (approximately 3.63 acres). This was proposed so as not to impede vehicular access to the commercial center from the west. Figure 7 below outlines the proposed General Plan Amendment and rezone for Site 14a.

Figure 6 – Site 14a - Aerial Photograph

As previously stated, future development of Site 14a would most likely be required to obtain discretionary land use entitlement permit from the City. In the event that

Page | 10

an income-restricted project that meets State eligibility requirements for ministerial processing is proposed, plans and supporting documentation would still be required to demonstrate compliance with City zoning requirements.

Figure 7 – Site 14a - Proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone

Table 3 below summarizes the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for the identified portion of Site 14a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if this area is redesignated to HHDR and rezoned to R-3.

Page | 11

Table 3 – Site 14a - Existing and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designations

APN

Approx.

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
GPA23008 & CZ23011
163-400-
042
(portion)

3.63 BP M-SC HHDR R-3 41 22 63 Out
It should be noted that prior to the May 24, 2023 Planning Commission hearing on this project, correspondence was submitted to the City on behalf of the Site 14a property owner requesting that the entirety of APN 163-400-042 (4.0 acres) be redesignated to HHDR and rezoned to R-3 as well as an additional 1.3 acres to the north and northeast (Attachment E). However, as a GPA for the additional property has not been initiated, no action can be taken on the remainder of the property at this time.

Conclusion
Table 4, below, outlines the City’s RHNA with the addition of those portions of Sites 5a and 14a outlined above. The new sites would more than make up for the units lost by the Paradise Knolls modification and would provide a substantial RHNA buffer in al l income categories.

Table 4 – 6
th Cycle RHNA with the Addition of Sites 5a & 14a
Income Levels
Total
(du)
Very Low
(du)
Low (du) Moderate
(du)
Above
Moderate
(du)
2021-2029 RHNA 1,207 749 731 1,810 4,497
Housing Element
RHNA Surplus with 19
Redesignation/Zone
Change Sites
+250 +65 +362 +1,174 +1,850
Paradise Knolls
Planning Area 2
Modification
-195 -105 +153
RHNA Surplus/Deficit
with Paradise Knolls
Reduction
+55 -40 +362 +1,327
New Sites 5a & 14a 221 117 -- -- 338
Page | 12

Revised RHNA
Surplus with Sites
5a & 14a
+276 +77 +362 +1,327 +2,042

3. Site 15a
Site 15a includes four parcels of land totaling 6.71 acres located on the east side of Clay Street, on either side of Linares Avenue, and across Clay Street from the Rock Rose and Bayberry Place project sites (Figure 8). The parcels are designated Commercial Neighborhood (CN) by the General Plan and are zoned Industrial Park (I-P). Councilmember Carmona had initially suggested this site for possible redesignation to HHDR and rezone to R-3 to make up for the loss of units in Paradise Knolls. However, the northern three parcels are the subject of the pending Serrano Homes project (MA21083), and the southern parcel contains a natural gas transmission pipeline. Thus, on April 6
th, the Council directed staff to explore whether
the project applicant of the three northern parcels would be willing to consider higher density, and to confirm the presence of a gas line on the southern parcel and whether it would preclude residential development.

Figure 8 – Site 15a - Aerial Photograph

Page | 13

The Serrano Homes project site (also on the July 20th agenda) includes three parcels (APNs 163-400-026, -028 & -029). The project was originally submitted to the City as a 110-unit apartment development at a density of 26.7 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).

Following a Planning Commission Study Session in 2021, the project was redesigned and resubmitted as a lower density 66-unit townhome project. In response to Council direction on April 6, 2023, the applicant was recently asked if they would be interested in increasing the project density to help make- up for the identified RHNA shortfall.

However, due to the history of the project and pending application, the applicant is not interested in pursuing additional density at this time.

Regarding the southern parcel of Site 15a (APN 163-400-050), there is a natural gas transmission pipeline located beneath the site in a northwest to southeast direction.

Because of this, residential uses on the site would be required to observe significant setbacks from the pipeline which would limit the amount of land available for development. Thus, re- designation of the site to HHDR and rezone to R -3 is not recommended.

Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 24, 2023, and adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-09 by a vote of 3-1 recommending that the City Council approve an Addendum to a certified programmatic final Environmental Impact Report , adopt findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and adopt GPA Nos. 23006, 23007 and 23008 and CZ Nos. 23009, 23010 and 23011. The Planning Commission also recommended that the remainder of Site 14a, an additional 1.3 acres to Site 14a, be redesignated to HHDR and rezoned to R -3 as requested by the property owner . The Planning Commission declined to recommend the northern portion of Site 5a (GPA23005 and CZ23008) due to its location within the ELO.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In approving the General Plan in 2017, the City Council certified the Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan Programmatic Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2016021025) in accordance with CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City has reviewed the proposed general plan and zoning map amendments and determined the EIR adequately addresses all the environmental issues associated with the project. The proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts on the environment based upon the analysis and conclusions presented in the 2017 EIR. In addition, previously identified significant impacts would not be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. Finally, no new feasible mitigation measures have been identified that would substantially reduce significant impacts identified in the 2017 EIR.

Therefore, the City has prepared an EIR Addendum (Attachment A, Exhibit A) for the proposed amendments. Unlike an EIR, an Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notices for the public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of Sites 5a and 14a. In addition, a legal advertisement for the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on July 9, 2023 (Attachment F).

Page | 15

Attachments:

A. Resolution No. 2023- 72 adopting an addendum to a certified programmatic final Environmental Impact Report and adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
a. Exhibit A. Addendum to Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan Programmatic Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2016021025) B. Ordinance No. 2023-12 approving CZ Nos. 23008, 23009, 23010 and 23011 a. Exhibit A: Map of CZ23008, CZ23009 & CZ23010
b. Exhibit B: Map of CZ23011
C. Adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-09
D. 2021-2029 Housing Element Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites E. Correspondence Received from Debi Myers dated May 17, 2023 F. Public Hearing Notice

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 20237-72

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN

ADDENDUM TO THE CERT IFIED ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT FOR THE JURUPA VALLEY GENERAL
PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH (1) GPA23005 AND CZ23008

TO CHANGE THE GENERA L PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165-080-005 FROM

COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (LDR) TO HIGHE ST

DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HHDR) AND CHANGE TH E

ZONING FROM RESIDENT IAL AGRICULTURE (R -A) TO
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3), GPA23006 AND CZ23009

TO CHANGE THE GENERA L PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF PORTI ONS OF APNS 165 -140-004, 165-
140-029, 165 -140-030 AND 165 -140-007 FROM

COMMERCIAL RETAIL (C R) TO HHDR AND CHANG E

THE ZONING FROM SCEN IC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL
(C-P-S) TO R-3, AND GPA23007 AND CZ23010 TO CHANGE

THE GENERAL PLAN LAN D USE DESIGNATION OF A
PORTION OF APN 165 -140-008 FROM CR TO HH DR AND
CHANGE THE ZONING FR OM C-1/C-P (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) TO R -3 F OR SIX PARCELS TOTAL ING

15.8 ACRES LOCATED I MMEDIATELY EAST OF V AN

BUREN BOULEVARD AND WEST OF PEDLEY ROAD AT
58TH STREET; AND (2) GPA 23008 AND CZ 23011 TO

CHANGE THE GENERAL P LAN LAND USE

DESIGNATION FROM BUS INESS PAR K (BP) TO HHDR

AND CHANGE THE ZONIN G FROM MANUFACTURING -
SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M-SC) TO R-3 FOR A PORTION
OF APN 163 -400-042 TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED

IMMEDIATELY EAST OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND

SOUTH OF LIMONITE AV ENUE IN THE DE ANZA

MARKETPLACE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project.
(a) On January 19, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and approved two residential projects on Planning Area 2 of Paradise Knolls at densities lower than those identified in the Housing Element. Government Code section 65863(c)(2) states that “If the approval of a development project results in fewer units by income category than identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for that parcel and the jurisdiction does not find that the remaining sites in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need by income level, the jurisdiction shall within 180 days identify and make available -2-

additional adequate sites to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need by income level. Nothing in this section shall authorize a city and county to disapprove a housing development project on the basis that approval of the housing project would require compliance with this paragraph.”
(b) Due to this decrease in density, the City is now in deficit of its low-income housing RHNA obligation by 40 dwelling units. To be compliant with Government Code section 65853(c)(2), the City needs to re -designate a minimum of 6.6 acres of l and to make up for this shortfall.
(c) On March 16, 2023 and April 16, 2023, the City Council reviewed possible sites for potential re-designation to Highest Density Residential (HHDR). On April 16, 2023, the City Council initiated GPA23005 and CZ23008 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-080-005 from Country Neighborhood ( LDR) to Highest Density Residential ( HHDR) and change the zoning from Residential Agriculture ( R-A) to General Residential (R-3), GPA23006 and CZ23009 to change the G eneral Plan land use designation of portions of APNs 165-140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 and 165 -140-007 from C ommercial Retail (CR) to HHDR and change the zoning from Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S) to R-3, and GPA23007 and CZ23010 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-140-008 from CR to HHDR and change the zoning from C-1/C-P (General Commercial) to R-3 for six parcels totaling 15.8 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58th Street; and (2) GPA 23008 and CZ23011 to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park (BP) to HHDR and change the zoning from Manufacturing- Service Commercial (M-SC) to R-3 for a portion of APN 163-400-042 totaling 3.63 acres located immediately east of Baldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace (collectively, “the Project”).

Section 2. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as “CEQA”). (b) Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project. (c) On September 7, 2017, the Jurupa Valley City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-14 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025, for the Jurupa Valley General Plan.
(d) The City has caused an Addendum to be prepared to the previously certified FEIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 because the approval of the Project does not require the preparation of a new or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.
(e) An Addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to the FEIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. -3-

(f) On May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution PC2023-09 on a 3 -1 vote (with Commissioner Jackson absent) recommending that the City Council adopt (1) GPA23006 and CZ23009 to change the General Plan land use designation of portions of APNs 165 -140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 and 165 -140-007 from Commercial Retail (CR) to HHDR and change the zoning from Scenic Highway Commercial (C -P-S) to R-3, and GPA23007 and CZ23010 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-140-008 from CR to HHDR and change the zoning from C -1/C-P (General Commercial) to R-3 for five parcels totaling 11.18 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58th street; and (2) GPA 23008 and CZ23011 to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park (BP) to HHDR and change the zoning from M-SC to R- 3 for a 3.63-acre portion of APN 163 -400-042 located immediately east of Ba ldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace.
(g) The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council consider initiating a General Plan Amendment and change of zone for the driveway and parking lot portion of APN 163 -400-042 and portions of APN 163 -400-040 and 163 -400-045 from Business Park (BP) to HHDR and change the zoning from M-SC and C-P-S to R-3, as requested by the property owner. The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council not adopt GPA 23005 and CZ23008 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-080-005 from Country Neighborhood (LDR) to Highest Density Residential (HHDR) and change the zoning from Residential Agriculture (R-A) to General Residential (R-3). (h) On July 20, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(i) The City Council has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that they are based upon substantial evidence that has been presented to the City Council in the record of proceedings. The documents, staff report, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination on the City’s website at www.JurupaValley.org. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the contents the Addendum to the FEIR prior to deciding whether to approve the Project.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings and Recommendation for Adoption of Addendum to Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan Programmatic Final Environmental Impact Report. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City Council finds and determines that an Addendum to the FEIR is the appropriate environmental document to analyze the Project because:
-4-

1) Some changes or additions to the FEIR are n ecessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
2) There are no substantial changes proposed by the Project that will require major revisions of the previously certified FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
3) No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and 4) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the FEIR was adopted showing that: (a) the changes proposed with the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed i n the FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
(b) The custodian of records for the FEIR and Addendum, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. (c) The Community Development Director is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA.

Section 4. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the FEIR which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 27th day of July, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
-5-

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valle y, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-72 was duly passed and adopted at a n adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 27th day of July, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 27th day of July, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit “A”
Addendum to the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan Programmatic Certified Final Environmental Impact Report

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-73

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING (1)
GENERAL PLAN AMENDME NT NO. 21006 TO CHAN GE

THE LAND USE DESIGNA TION FROM COMMERCIAL

NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) TO VERY HIGH DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL (VHDR) A ND REMOVING THE MISS ION

DE ANZA SPECIFIC PLA N AND SPECIFIC PLAN

OVERLAY FROM THESE PARCELS TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 66 TOWNH OMES ON 4.13 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF CLAY STREET

BETWEEN HAVEN VIEW DRIVE AND LINARES AVENUE
(APN: 163 -400-029; 0 26 & 028), AND (2) GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 23005 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL

PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN
165-080-005 FROM COUNTRY NEIGHBORHOOD (LDR) TO
HIGHEST DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HHDR), GPA23006 TO

CHANGE THE GENERAL P LAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF PORTI ONS OF APNS 165 -140-004, 165-
140-029, 165 -140-030 AND 165 -140-007 FRO M
COMMERCIAL RETAIL (C R) TO HHDR , AND GPA23007

TO CHANGE THE GENERA L PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF APN 165-140-008 FROM
CR TO HHDR FOR SIX PARCELS TOTALING 15.8 ACRES

LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF VAN BUREN
BOULEVARD AND WEST O F PEDLEY ROAD AT 58T H
STREET; AND (3) GPA 23008 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL

PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM BUSINESS PARK
(BP) TO HHDR FOR A PORTION OF AP N 163 -400-042
TOTALING 3.63 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST

OF BALDWIN AVENUE AN D SOUTH OF LIMONITE

AVENUE IN THE DE ANZA MARKETPLACE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Government Code section 65358 limits the number of times a city can amend a mandatory element of its General Plan to no more than four amendments per year. In compliance with the Government Code, the City Council is considering General Plan amendments for several projects as part of this Resolution.

Section 2. Projects.
(a) Rexco Real Estate Development (“Rexco”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21006, Change of Zone No. 21008, Site Development Permit No. 21083, -2-

Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, Variance No. 23004, and to amend the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Specific Plan Overlay so it does not apply to the Applicant’s property (collectively, Master Application No. 21245 or MA No. 21245) to permit the construction of 66 townhomes on

4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and Linares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) (the “Project”). General Plan Amendment No. 2100 6 is the subject matter of this Resolution. Chan ge of Zone No. 21008 will be considered by separate ordinance. Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, Variance No. 23004, and the amendment to the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Specific Plan Overlay will be considered by separate resolution.
(b) On April 16, 2023, the City Council initiated GPA23005 and CZ23008 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165 -080-005 from Country Neighborhood (LDR) to Highest Density Residential (HHDR) and change the zonin g from Residential Agriculture (R-A) to General Residential (R -3), GPA23006 and CZ23009 to change the General Plan land use designation of portions of APNs 165 -140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140- 030 and 165-140-007 from Commercial Retail (CR) to HHDR and change the zoning from Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S) to R-3, and GPA23007 and CZ23010 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-140-008 from CR to HHDR and change the zoning from C-1/C-P (General Commercial) to R-3 for six parcels totaling 15.8 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58th Street; and (2) GPA 23008 and CZ23011 to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park (BP) to HHDR and change the zoning from M -SC to R-3 for a 3.63 -acre portion of APN 163 -400-042 located immediately east of Baldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace.

The General Plan Amendments are the subject matter of this Resolution. The Change of Zones will be considered by separate ordinance.

Section 3. General Plan Amendments.
(a) The following General Plan Amendments are being processed through this Resolution:
1) Rexco is seeking approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21006 to change the General Plan land use designation of APNs: 163 -400-029; 026 & 028 from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to Very High Density Residential (VHDR), and to remove the Specific Plan Overlay (SPO) from these parcels. The findings for approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21006 are set forth in Exhibit “A ” and the General Plan amendment is depicted in Attachment A-1 to Exhibit “A”.
2) The City Council initiated General Plan Amendment No. 23005 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165 -080-005 from Country Neighborhood (LDR) to Highest Density Residential (HHDR), GPA23006 to change the General Plan land use designation of portions of APNs 165-140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 and 165- 140-007 from Commercial Retail (CR) to HHDR, and GPA23007 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-140-008 from CR to HHDR for six parcels totaling 15.8 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and we st of Pedley Road at 58th Street; and (2) GPA 23008 to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park (BP) to HHDR for a 3.63-acre portion of APN 163-400-042 located immediately east of Baldwin Avenue -3-

and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace. The findings for approval of General Plan Amendment Nos. 23005, 23006, 23007 and 23008 are set forth in Exhibit “B” and the General Plan Amendment is depicted in Attachment B-1 to Exhibit “B”.

Section 4. Approval of General Plan Amendment s. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves:
(a) General Plan Amendment No. 21006 to change the General Plan land use designation of APNs: 163 -400-029; 026 & 028 from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to Very High Density Residential (VHDR), and to remove t he Specific Plan Overlay (SPO) from these parcel as depicted in Attachment A-1 to Exhibit “A.” The City Council’s approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21006 shall not be effective until the effective date of the ordinance adopting Change of Zone No. 21008.
(b) General Plan Amendment No. 23005 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165 -080-005 from Country Neighborhood (LDR) to Highest Density Residential (HHDR), GPA23006 to change the General Plan land use designation of portions of APNs 165 -140-004, 165-140-029, 165-140-030 and 165 -140-007 from Commercial Retail (CR) to HHDR, and GPA23007 to change the General Plan land use designation of a portion of APN 165-140-008 from CR to HHDR for six parcels totaling 15.8 acres located im mediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58th Street; and (2) GPA 23008 to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park (BP) to HHDR for a 3.63 -acre portion of APN 163-400-042 located immediately east of Baldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace as depicted in Attachment B-1 to Exhibit “B” . The City Council’s approval of General Plan Amendment Nos. 23005, 23006, 23007 and 23008 shall not be effective until the effective date of the ordinance adopting Change of Zone No s. 23008, 23009, 23010 and 23011.

Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 27th day of July, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-73 was duly passed and adopted at a n adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 27th day of July, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 27th day of July, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

-5-

Exhibit “A”
General Plan Amendment No. 21006

Section 1. Project.
(a) Rexco Real Estate Development (“Rexco”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21006, Change of Zone No. 21008, Site Development Permit No. 21083, Tentative Tract Map No. 38697, Variance No. 23004, and to amend the Mission De Anza Specific Plan and Spe cific Plan Overlay so it does not apply to the Applicant’s property (collectively, Master Application No. 21245 or MA No. 21245) to permit the construction of 66 townhomes on

4.13 acres located at the east side of Clay Street between Haven View Drive and L inares Avenue (APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028) (the “Project”).
(b) Rexco is seeking approval of General Pl an Amendment No. 21006 to change the General Plan land use designation of APNs: 163-400-029; 026 & 028 from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to Very High Density Residential (VHDR), and to remove the Specific Plan Overlay (SPO) from these parcel. The change to the General Plan land use designation is depicted in Attachment A-1.
(c) Section 9.30.010.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that any amendment to any part of the Jurupa Valley General Plan, shall be adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 65300 et seq. of the Government Code, as now written or hereafter amended, and Chapter 9.30 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(d) Section 9.30.010.B. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the initiation of proceedings for the amendment of any part of the Jurupa Valley General Plan shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.30 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. (e) Section 9.30.040.D. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the owner of real property, or a person authorized by the owner, seeking to change the land use designation on that real property, shall have the right to apply for a General Plan amendmen t without having to request that the City Council adopt an order initiating proceedings for an amendment as detailed in Section 9.30.040. Instead, the owner of real property, or a person authorized by the owner, seeking to change the land use designation on that real property may apply for a General Plan amendment through the Community Development Department and pay the required fee. Upon submittal of an application, the amendment shall be processed, heard and decided in accordance with Sections 9.30.010 and 9.30.100 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. (f) Section 9.30.100.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that proposals to amend any part of the Jurupa Valley General Plan shall be heard by the Planning Commission during a public hearing on the m atter. Further, Government Code Section 65353 provides that when a city has a Planning Commission authorized by local ordinance or resolution to review and recommend action on a proposed general plan, the commission shall hold at least one public hearing before approving a recommendation on the adoption of a general plan. -6-

(g) Section 9.30.040(F)(2) provides that the Planning Commission resolution recommending approval of an Entitlement/Policy Amendment to the General Plan shall make the following findings:
1) The proposed change does not involve a change in or conflict with:
the City of Jurupa Valley Vision; any General Planning Principle set forth in General Plan Appendix B; or any Foundation Component designation in the General Plan. 2) The proposed amendment would either contribute to the purposes of the General Plan or, at a minimum, would not be detrimental to them. 3) An amendment is required to address changes in ownership of land or land not under the land use authority of the City Council. (h) Section 9.30.100.(2 ) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation for approval or disapproval within a reasonable time, by resolution, including therein its findings, and transmit it to the City Council with a copy mailed to the applicant. A recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission cannot reach a decision within a reasonable time after closing the hearing, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and shall be deemed a recommendation to deny the proposal. Further, Government Code S ection 65354 provides that the Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption of a general plan, that a recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the commission, and that the Planning Commission shall send its recommendation to the legislative body.
(i) Section 9.30.100.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation of the Planning Commission on an amendment of the General Plan, the City Clerk must set the matter for public hearing befor e the City Council at the earliest convenient day and give notice of public hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.
(j) Section 9.30.100.(4) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the City Council must render its decision within a reasonable time.

A decision to amend the General Plan, or any part or element thereof, must be made by resolution, which resolution must be adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than the majority of the total membership of the City Council. The City Council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, however, that any substantial modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Commission shall first be referred to the Commission for its recommendation. (k) Section 9.30.100.(5) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a proposal to amend any part or element of the General Plan may not be app roved by the City Council until all procedures required by the Jurupa Valley CEQA implementing procedures to approve a matter have been completed.
-7-

Section 2. Procedural Findings for General Plan Amendment No. 21006. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21245 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On June 28, 2023, the Planning Commission o f the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution PC- 2023-14 on a 3 -1 vote (with Commissioner Pruitt absent due to a conflict of interest) recommending that the City Council approve the Project. (c) On July 20, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21245 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings for General Plan Amendment No. 21006 . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21006:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in the Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negativ e Declaration (“MND”) was prepared by the City in full compliance with CEQA.
(b) On July 20 , 2023, t he City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -70 adopting the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) for the Project. Resolution No. 2023-70 is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

Section 4. Findings for Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21006 . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that General Plan Amendment No. 21006 should be adopted because:
(a) The prop osed change does not involve a change in or conflict with the Riverside County Vision; any General Planning Principle set forth in General Plan Appendix B; or any Foundation Component designation in the General Plan. (b) The proposed amendment would either contribute to the purposes of the General Plan or, at a minimum, would not be detrimental to them. -8-

1) The General Plan amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element LUE 2.2 Higher Density Residential policy to accommodate higher density residential development in walkable, pedestrian oriented areas near major transportation corridors, concentrated employment areas, and community and town centers, and promote the development of high quality apartments and condominiums that will encourage local investment an d pride of ownership. The Project is for a high quality multi -family community along a primary transportation corridor in Clay Street. The community would also be walkable, ownership based, and is proposed at a density consistent with the Very Highest Den sity Residential (VHDR) land use designation (up to 20 dwelling units per acre) in the City’s General Plan. The proposed density is 15.9 dwelling units per acre.
2) The General Plan amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element LUE 2.3 Infrastructure policy to ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses. All street improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.
3) The General Plan amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element LUE 2.6 Buffering policy to require setbacks and other design elements to buffer residential units from the impacts of abutting agric ultural, roadway, commercial, and industrial uses, to the maximum extent possible. The development meets the required setbacks and incorporates design features such as screen walls and dense landscaping to buffer residential units from any potential impacts of abutting residential and commercial uses. 4) The General Plan amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility policy to ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures. The proposed project successfully incorporates California Mission architectural style that is compatible with the surrounding area. Furthermore, the new development will visually enhance the site and appearance of the general neighborhood. 5) The General Plan amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding policy to require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as police and fire facilities, parks, streets, and trail improvements. The applicant would be required to contribute over $413,000 in Impact Fees which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities. The applicant would also be required to provide an Inclusionary Housing In -Lieu Fee of $2.50/ft 2 (per the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance), which would be $328,797 that the City would use towards the provision affordable housing. (c) An amendment is required to address changes in ownership of land or land not under the land use authority of the City Council. The Project site is under private ownership and the developer seeks to change the land use from Commercial Neighborhood to Very High Density Residential (VHDR), which would allow for a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre. -9-

Attachment A-1

Page | 1
1 STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 27, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.F
PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSIDER ZCA22010: AMEND
REGULATIONS PERTAINI NG TO (1) ACCESSORY BUILDINGS,

TRADITIONAL NEIGHBOR HOOD DESIGN STANDARD S, AND
FENCES, (2) ESTABLISH SETBACKS IN THE R-2A, R-5, R-A, R-R, R- T, R-D, A-1, A-P, A-2, A-D, W-1, W-2 ZONES, (3) MAKE DEFINITIONAL CHANGE AND (4) DETER MINE THE PROPOSED OR DINANCE IS

EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15061 (b)(3)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council open and continue the public hearing to the August 3, 2023 City Council meeting in order to provide time to prepare the ordinance to reflect changes made by the Planning Commission at its June 14, 2023 meeting.

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Joe Perez Rod B. Butler
Community Development Director City Manager

RETURN TO AGENDA