Page - 1 -
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, September 7, 2023
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.
B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.
C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.
D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
Page - 2 -
B. PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING CONSTITUTION WEEK
C. PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL LATINO/A PHYSICIAN DAY
6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
8. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON
1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT A GENCY BOARD OF
DIRECTORS MEETING OF AUGUST 24, 2023
2. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION – WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PR OGRAMS
AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 2023
3. UPDATE ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS JOINT MEETING OF THE POLICY COMMITTEES
(CEHD, EEC AND TC) OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
9. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. AUGUST 17, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Persons wishing to address t he City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.
Page - 3 -
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In acc ordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,466,665.93
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated July 27 and August 2, 10, 17 and 24, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated July 21, 31 and August 4, and 18, 2023.
C. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA EXTEND TH E RIVERSIDE COUNTY A BANDONED
VEHICLE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-76, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE
SERVICE FEE COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE
AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 2034
D. APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIAL
DISTRICT LANDSCAPING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND MCE CORPORATION
1. Requested Action: That the City Council Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Special District Landscaping Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and MCE Corporation and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
2. That the City Council authori ze total additional expenditures to MCE Corporation in an amount not to exceed $723,103.92.
E. ACCEPTANCE OF SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PACIFIC AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (42 nd STREET TO LIMONITE
AVENUE)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept $690,120 in Senate Bill 821, Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program, funding for The Pacific Avenue Transportation Project, Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) Project #23115; and
Page - 4 -
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement No 24 -62-016-00 with the Riverside County Transportation Commission in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.
F. FIRST A MENDMENT TO THE AGRE EMENT FOR CONSTRUCTI ON
MANAGEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND KOA CORPORATION FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK
GAP CLOSURE, CIP #19107
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the F irst Amendment for Construction Management Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and KOA Corporation for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure, CIP #19107 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment in substantially the form attached to the staff report and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.
G. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION AND SIDEWALK
EASEMENT SOUTHWEST OF THE LIMONITE AVENUE AND COREY
STREET INTERSECTION (FIRE MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LLC, APNS:
163-021-033, 163-021-037, & 163-021-038)
1. Recommended Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, adjacent to existing Limonite Avenue public right of way as described in DED22-008.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication DED22-008.
3. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, adjacent to existing Corey Street public right-of-way as described in DED22-009.
4. Authorize the Director of Publ ic Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-009.
5. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for sidewalk purposes, alongside Corey Street as described in sidewalk easement DED23-001;
6. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-001.
12. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
13. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
MA21269 (GPA21010, SP21001, DA21001, & TTM38318); PROJECT:
CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING
FINDINGS, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR “THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA
VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN” THAT WOULD PERMIT DEVELOPME NT
Page - 5 -
OF UP TO 1,192 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3
MILLION SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND
USES (INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION USES); A
HOTEL WITH UP TO 160 ROOMS; AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES
OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ON AN APPROXIM ATELY 248.3-ACRE PROJECT SITE GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR-60 TO THE NORTH, THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEV ARD TO THE WEST ; (APPLICANT: EM
RANCH OWNER, LLC)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-77, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPTING
FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE DISTRICT AT
JURUPA VALLEY PROJECT TO ALLOW FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1,192 NEW RESIDENTIAL
UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES
(INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND LOGISTIC USES); A
HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE AND HOSPITALITY AREA;
AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE ON AN APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT
SITE GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR-60 TO THE NORTH,
THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO
THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO THE
WEST
b. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-78, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21010, SPECIFIC
PLAN (SP21001), AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38318
TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1,192
NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3
MILLION SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL LAND USES (INCLUDING WAREHOUSE
AND LOGISTIC USES); A HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE
AND HOSPITALITY AREA; AND AP PROXIMATELY 11
ACRES OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ON AN
APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT SITE
Page - 6 -
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR -60 TO THE NORTH, THE
SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE
SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO THE WEST
(THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY)
c. Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 2023-14, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 21010 BETWEEN THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND EM RANCH OWNER,
LLC, FOR THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY PROJECT
ON AN APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT SITE
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR -60 TO THE NORTH, THE
SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE
SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO THE WEST
14. COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
16. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
17. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
18. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of September 21, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332-6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less t han 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.
Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A
-1-
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
August 17, 2023
1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. INVOCATION was given by members of the Buddhist Meditation Center.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Brian Berkson.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva , seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Agenda.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
5. PRESENTATIONS
6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
8. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS
1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee meeting of August 7, 2023.
2. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments – Administration & Finance Committee meeting of August 9, 2023.
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA
1. Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva reported that he was unable to attend today’s Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District meeting, however, he reported that a bird was identified today to be positive with West Nile Virus within the Sky Country community. He encouraged anyone who sees a sick or dead bird to notify the NMVCD or they can reach out to him at City Hall.
C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON
1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority Board of Directors meeting of July 28, 2023.
2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting of August 17, 2023.
9. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Rod Butler reported that Tropical Storm Hilary is expected to bring significant rainfall over the next few days. He noted that the City’s Public Works Division is gearing up for the storm and will be prepared for any impacts. He announced that City Hall will be closed on Monday, September 4, 2023 for the Labor Day holiday. City Hall will resume regular business hours on Tuesday, September 5, 2023.
10. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT UPDATE
Deputy Julieta Meissen gave a presentation on Jurupa Valley Sheriff’s Station Explorer Post #880. She introduced current members of the Explorer Post and shared the requirements and benefits of the program.
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. JULY 27, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
B. AUGUST 3, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , to approve the Minutes of the July 27, 2023 regular meeting and the August 3, 2023 regular meeting.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
-3-
12. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-13
Requested Action: That the City Council con duct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-13, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) AMEND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO DETACHED
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN
STANDARDS, AND FENCES, (2) ESTABLISH SETBACKS IN THE R -2A, R-5, R-A, R-R, R-T, R-D, A-1, A-P, A-2, A-D, W-1, W-2 ZONES, (3) MAKE
DEFINITIONAL CHANGES PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY
BUILDINGS, KITCHENS AND LOTS, AND (4) MAKE A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
C. APPROVAL OF THE ANNUAL AGREEMENT WITH THE JURUPA
VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the annual agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce for an amount not to exceed $20 ,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially t he form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
D. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH REACH OUT FOR FY 2023 -24
FUNDING
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the annual agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Reach Out for an amount not to exceed $30,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
-4-
E. CONSULTANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY AND B&A GRANT SERVICES AND SOFTWARE FOR GRANT
WRITING SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and B&A Grant Services and Software for grant writing services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
F. AWARD OF BID FOR A PUBLIC WORKS BACKHOE LOADER
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of one new John Deere 310P Backhoe Loader for the Public Works Department from RDO Equipment, Riverside, in the amount of $163,283.04.
G. BID AWARD FOR A SERVICE TRUCK
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of one 2023 Ford F-350 Service Truck for the Public Works Department from Sunrise Ford, Fontana, in the amount of $66,410.36.
H. APPROVAL OF PARC EL MAP NO. 37872 SPA CE CENTER LOCATED
NORTH OF IBERIA STREET, WEST OF SPACE CE NTER COURT, AND
SOUTH OF VENTURE DRI VE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF
DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS
1. Requested Action: That the City Council a pprove Parcel Map 37872 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for public utility purposes Lot “A”, Lot “B”, and Lot “C” (Manitou Court). The dedication is for p ublic utility purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within the “private street.”
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Parcel Map 37872.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and
4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.
-5-
I. CONFIRM THE AUTOMATIC INCREASE IN THE WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPM ENT MITIGATION FEE
APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PLAN AREA
PURSUANT TO JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
3.80.050.D
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-74, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY AMENDING RESO LUTION NO. 2021 -24 A ND CONFIRMING
THE AUTOMATIC INCREA SE IN THE WESTERN RI VERSIDE
COUNTY MULTIPLE SPEC IES HABITAT CONSERVA TION PLAN
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MI TIGATION FEE APPLICA BLE TO ALL
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PLAN AREA PURSUANT T O JURU PA
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.80.050.D AND MAKING CEQA
FINDINGS
J. APPROVAL OF SECO ND AMENDMENT TO AGRE EMENT WITH
ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRON MENTAL INC. FOR THE PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TH E PROPOSED
“DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN” PROJE CT, (CASE NUMBER: MA21269), (A PPLICANT: EM RANCH O WNER, LLC) –
REMOVED FROM THE CON SENT CALENDAR FOR FU RTHER
DISCUSSION
Requested Action: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Agreement with UltraSystems for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed “The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan ” project (formerly referred to as “District at Rubidoux ” Project) in an amount not to exceed $114,107 to be funded entirely by the applicant by an advance deposit sufficient to cover the EIR and the administrative costs.
City Attorney Peter Thorson announced that Council Member Leslie Altamirano will abstain from Item 12.J on the Consent Calendar, an amendment to the City’s agreement with Ultrasystems to prepare the EIR for the District at Jurupa Valley. The FPPC has provided advice that the Project will have a material financial effect on her personal residence property and so she will not participate in Council actions concerning the Project. The record will show that she abstained on this item and will include his explanation.
Since the Item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion, Council Member Altamirano left the Council Cham ber while the matter was being discussed.
-6-
A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva , to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item 12.J, which was removed for further discussion.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: L. Altamirano
13. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
12.J APPROVAL OF SECON D AMENDMENT TO AGREE MENT WITH
ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRON MENTAL INC. FOR THE PREPARATION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROP OSED
“DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN ” PROJECT, (CASE NUMBER: MA21269), (APPLICANT: EM RANCH OWNER, LLC)
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 12.J be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. He noted that he would vote “No” on this item as he does not support bu ilding a warehouse within a residential community outside of the industrial overlay zone.
Council Member Brian Berkson indicated that this is only an agreement to modify the Environmental Impact Report , it is not an approval of the project by the City Council. This is an at-risk developer fee and since the developer is paying for the environmental consultant, the City Council is ensuring that they are consulting on behalf of the City as well as the developer.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Brian Berkson, to authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Agreement with UltraSystems for the preparation of a n Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed “The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan” project (formerly referred to as “District at Rubidoux” Project) in an amount not to exceed $114,107 to be funded entirely by the applicant by an advance dep osit sufficient to cover the EIR and the administrative costs.
Council Member Leslie Altamirano abstained from voting on this item. She stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chamber.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: A. Carmona
Absent: None
Abstained: L. Altamirano
-7-
14. PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF (3) NEW CLASSICATIONS, (1) RECLASSIFICATION, (1)
SALARY RANGE ADJUSTM ENT AND AMENDMENT TO THE
ESTABLISHED SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 2023-2024
Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager, presented the staff report.
Council Member Armando Carmona suggested that bilingual skills in English and Spanish be added as a preferred job ability for the Event Coordinator and the Manager of Marketing & Communications positions.
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva , to approve the creation of three (3) new classifications including the job description and salary range as follows: Event Coordinator and salary range of ($4,48 5.64 - $6,011.19); Manager of Marketing & Communications and salary range of ($8,113.29 - $10,872.59); Principal Civil Engineer and salary range of ($9,885.26 - $13,247.20); and approve the reclassification of one (1) Accountant II position to a Senior Accountant and salary range of ($6,338.09 - $8,493.65); and approve a salary adjustment for the job description of Management Aid and salary range as follows: ($4,712.73 - $6,315.50); include bilingual skills in English and Spanish as a preferred job ability for the Event Coordinator and the Manager of Marketing & Communications positions; and adopt Resolution No. 202 3-75, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ESTABLI SHED
CLASSIFICATION AND C OMPENSATION SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2023-24
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
16. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
17. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.
-8-
18. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
There were no additional Council comments.
19. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 7:41 p.m.
The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held September 7, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.B
CHECK REGISTERS
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated July 27 and August 2, 10, 1 7 and 24, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated July 21, 31 and August 4, and 18, 2023.
The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2023-24 Budget was adopted on June 15, 2023. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.
ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code. The check register dated August 2, 2023 includes a $5,710.80 payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached herewith.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
07/27/2023 $ 1,200,293.71
08/02/2023 $ 2,340,320.02
08/10/2023 $ 639,231.46
08/17/2023 $ 678,504.10
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: IRWIN SALAS, CODE COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.C
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA TO EXTEND THE RIVERSIDE COUNT Y ABANDONED
VEHICLE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-76, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE SERVICE FEE
COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED
VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 2034
BACKGROUND
In 1990, the California State Legislature enacted legi slation allowing for the creation of county-based vehicle service authorities, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22710 of the California Vehicle Code. The purpose of the legislation was to allow for some reimbursement to local governmental agencies for a portion of their costs incurred as a result of the abatement, removal and disposal as public nuisances of any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles. In June of 1994, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (Authority) was formed and imposed a one dollar annual vehicle registration fee on vehicles registered to an owner with an address in Riverside County.
ANALYSIS
The current Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program is set to expire in May 2024. This program has proven to be a valuable resource for the county and the member cities and the Authority desires to continue the program. State law allows for the extension of the program for an additional 10 years with approval of the County and a majority of cities
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
comprising a majority of the population of the incorporated areas of the County. In Jurupa Valley, the Abandoned Vehicle Autho rity funds have been utilized to acquire up to fifty percent of the cost of tablets, trucks, bullet proof vests, and handheld ticketing devices.
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution at this time.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no cost associated with the adoption of the resolution.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the resolution as recommended
2. Do not approve the resolution. This may impact the County’s ability to continue the program if the majority of cities comprising the majority of the incorporated area population approval requirement is not met.
3. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE
SERVICE FEE COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 2034
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority was formed on or about June 1, 1994, pursuant to the provisions of California Vehicle Code §§ 9250.7 and 22710 enacted by the Legislature in 1990 which authorize the establishment of a service authority and imposition of a service fee on all registered motor vehicles located within a county; and
WHEREAS, beginning in June 1994 and continuing to the present, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority has been the recipient of service fees collected on its behalf by the California Department of Motor Vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the service fees received by the Riverside County Abandoned Veh icle Abatement Service Authority are used to reimburse local governmental agencies for a portion of their costs incurred as a result of the abatement, removal and disposal as public nuisances of any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority apportions and distributes service fee proceeds to each member agency according to the formula set forth in California Vehicle Code §§ 22710; and
WHEREAS, since the establishment of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program in June 1994, it has disbursed $35,128,331.25 in service fee proceeds to member agencies and caused the abatement of approximately 189,776 abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles located in various cities and the unincorporated area of Riverside County; and
WHEREAS, the service fee collected as part of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority program is set to expire in May 2024; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code § 9250.7 to allow for an extension of the service fee collected as part of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program in increments of up to 10 years each if the board of supervisors of the county, by a two -thirds vote, and a majority of the cities comprising a majority of the population of the incorporated areas within the county adopt resolutions providing for the extension of the service fee; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to the City of Jurupa Valley to have the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program continue beyond its current termination date of May 2024. -2-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California , that it approves the extension of the service fee collected on behalf of the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority until May 14, 2034.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of September, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-76 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of September, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of September, 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.D
APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIAL DISTRICT
LANDSCAPING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND MCE CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Special District Landscaping Services between the City of J urupa Valley and MCE Corporation and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney. 2) That the City Council authorize total additional expenditures to MCE Corporation in an amount not to exceed $723,103.92.
BACKGROUND
On July 21 , 2022, the City Council approved the A greement for Special District Landscaping Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and MCE Corporation (“MCE”).
The Agreement requires MCE to provide landscaping, irrigation management, and other maintenance services to seven (7) Community Facility Districts (“CFD’s”) and 19 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts (“L LMD’s”). The Agreement did not include the landscape and maintenance of stormwater Best Management Practice infrastructure (“BMP’s) that reside in one (1) L&LMD’s and seven (7) CFD’s.
CFD’s and LLMD’s are usually formed when new residential or commercial developments are finalized. These maintenance districts typically contain landscaping, lighting, and other beautification features that require regular maintenance. The primary funding source for these maintenance districts is from assessments levied on properties within the respective district.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
As new developments that include LLMD’s and CFD’s are finalized, the City is required to provide maintenance services to those district s. Since the approval of the Agreement with MCE, the City has accepted one (1) additional CFD, formally known as CFD No. 2018-002 (Stone).
ANALYSIS
In Fiscal Year 2023 -24, the City anticipates accepting maintenance responsibilities for two (2) additional CFD’s; Shadow Rock and Paradise Knolls, as well as eight (8) LLMDs; Zone G, Zone L, Zone T, Zone W, Zone Y, Zone Z, Zone AA, and Zone FF.
In addition to the new locations, MCE will provide landscape maintenance to BMP’s located in one (1) existing L LMD; Zone K, and seven (7) existing CFD’s; Bellegrave A, Harvest, Mission Estates, Granite Ridge/Cantera, Riverbend, Skypark, and Quarry.
MCE has performed exceptionally well under the current Agreement. MCE’s personnel of 14 staff members have been very responsive to the City’s needs, and continue to provide these services at a reasonable cost. As the City takes over maintenance responsibilities for the new locations, MCE will continue to increase their staffing levels to a total of 24, to provide the level of service required.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City oversees LLMD’s and special districts that generate their own revenue. The budget for each LLMD and/or special district is increased on an annual basis by changes in the Consumer Price Index. In the event that maintenance costs for an LLMD and/or special district are g reater than the actual assessment collected for that LLMD and/or special district, the City may subsidize the excess expenditures through the City’s General Fund.
New L&LMD/CFD Landscape Maintenance Locations
L&LMD Zone/ CFD Annual Maintenance Expenditure
Zone G - Avalon Court $7,896.96
Zone L - Flabob $9,713.16
Zone T - Rubidoux Industrial Center $7,646.40
Zone W - Hudson $5,283.36
Zone Y - Wheeler Upfitter $10,657.68
Zone Z - Agua Mansa Commerce Park $31,344.24
Zone AA - DC Fuels $6,430.44
Page | 3
Zone FF - Montecito $4,651.80
18-002 - Stone $13,263.96
19-001 - Paradise Knolls $25,196.52
19-012 - Shadow Rock $412,292.40
Annual Total $534,376.92
BMP Locations
ALTERNATIVES
1) Do not a pprove the Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Special District Landscaping Services
2) Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ***********************
L&LMD Zone/ CFD Annual Maintenance Expenditure
Zone K - Jurupa Estates $4,599.96
2013-001 - Bellegrave A $54,378.00
2014-001 - Harvest $33,469.20
2016-001 - Mission Estates $22,293.84
2014-003 - Granite/Cantera $23,517.24
2015-001 - Riverbend $24,257.40
2015-002 - Sky Park $10,798.80
2016-001 - The Quary $15,412.56
Annual Total $188,727.00
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL
DISTRICT LANDSCAPING SERVICES BETWEEN MCE
CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
This First Amendment is made and effective as of September 7, 2023, between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (“City”) and MCE Corporation (“Contractor”).
In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This First Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On July 21, 2022, the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled “CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AGREEEMNT FOR SPECIAL DISTRICT LANDSCAPING SERVICES”
2. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. SCOPE OF WORK
Contractor shall perform the landscape maintenance work as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A (“Work”) and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. The Work shall be completed within the time schedule set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City. This Agreement is not exclusive the City retains the right to hire other contractors to perform similar work.
3. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows
3. COST OF WORK
For the Work described in Section 2. of this Agreement, Contractor shall be paid on the basis of the work performed in accordance with the Schedule of Payments attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. The payment for work performed under this Agreement shall not exceed a maximum of two million seventy-five thousand seven hundred seventy-seven dollars and eighty-eight cents ($2,075,777.88) during each fiscal year payable in accordance with the Schedule of Payments. Any terms other than a description of the work to be performed, costs of the work, or the payment schedule contained in Exhibits A or B is null and void and not a part of this Agreement.
4. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
-1-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and executed personally or on its behalf by its duly authorized representative.
MCE CORPORATION
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
A California Municipal Corporation
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
-2-
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
-10-
A. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK APPLICABLE TO ALL SITES
The General Description of Services describes base services that must apply to all service districts and City facilities listed below. The following scope of work has been modified from the contractor’s original proposal dated May 12, 2022.
Districts to be Maintained
Landscape and Lighting
Maintenance Districts
Community Facilities Districts City Facilities
4 Bellegrave A Jurupa Valley City Hall
5 Harvest
Jurupa Valley Operations
Center
6 Mission Estates
7 Riverbend Senior Center
9 Skypark
14 Quarry Food Pantry
16 Granite Ridge/Cantera
17 Shadow Rock I-15 Interchange
21 Paradise Knolls
34 Stone
A – Dollar Storage
E – Cold Storage
G – Avalon Court
I – Shops at Bellegrave
K – Jurupa Estates
L - Flabob
M – Pilot Flying J
N – Midland Carriers
S – Vernola Marketplace
T – Rubidoux Industrial
Center
U – Ice Box
W - Hudson
X – Horizon Business Park
Y – Wheeler Upfitter
Z - Aqua Mansa
Commerce Park
AA – DC Fuels
FF - Montecito
-11-
General Requirements:
1. All tree, shrub and other woody plant work shall be completed in compliance with approved American National Standard (ANSI) A300 Standards (all pertinent parts and sections).
2. All wor k, including Maintenance (M -Series), Planting (P -Series), Irrigation (G, 1, R- Series), and Electrical (E-Series).
3. At least one (1) worker from any field crew shall be able to effectively communicate with City Inspector. Owner/Manager/Maintenance Supervisor shall return phone calls and e-mails within 24-hours, unless previously approved arrangements are made.
4. Weekly Schedules are to be submitted to the Public Works Operations Manager or delegated staff on a weekly basis.
5. Daily progress reports are to be submitted to the Public Works Operations Manager or delegated staff daily.
Safety:
6. All work must comply with the most up to date Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Maintenance Requirements.
1. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the condition of the premises on which the work is performed and for safety of the premises on which the work is performed. This requirement shall not be limited to normal working hours, but shall apply continuously. The Contractor shall conform to all governing safety laws and regulations.
2. Contractor is not authorized to block traffic lanes unless all legal traffic control measures are in place, and the City has been notified of the intended closure 72- hours in advance.
3. Contractor shall not trespass, perform illegal activities, or walk on top of walls. Contractor shall use ladders in a safe and responsible matter.
General Landscape Maintenance:
1. The Contractor shall maintain all parkways in weed-free condition. All areas shall be visually inspected on a weekly basis and any weeds shall be removed.
Contractor is encouraged to remain proactive with weed abatement and institute protocols that reduce the weed population as opposed to mitigated weeds by hand after they have matured.
2. The Contractor shall keep all parkways in a litter-free condition. All areas shall be checked on a weekly basis and any visible trash or debris shall be removed and disposed of properly by the Contractor.
3. The contractor shall control all pests and diseases, including rodents and snails at no additional costs to the City. Time and materials shall be all-inclusive in the monthly cost of services. This includes any existing pest control burden or diseases. Bee hives will be removed as an additional line-item expense under a time and materials charge format.
4. The Contractor shall trim and dispose of any dead material from all shrubs, bushes, and groundcover to maintain an aesthetically pleasing appearance at all times.
5. The Contractor shall trim and edge all groundcover adjacent to all hardscape and around all trees (minimum 12-inch radius) and shrub trunks to maintain a pleasing appearance at all times. The Contractor shall trim plant groundcover materials at a minimum of 12-inch and at a 45 degree angle from all hardscape edges for ease in maintenance and optimum irrigation efficiency (drip distance may vary, and may not require a 45 degree cut). This shall be performed and continued throughout the extent of the Agreement.
6. The Contractor shall trim and edge around all fixed objects including fire hydrants, telephone and utility poles, irrigation boxes, other utility fixtures, and other prominent infrastructure items. The contractor shall trim plant material back at least 12-inches from all utilities and utility boxes in all planted areas and also at a 45-degree angle where groundcover is established. Any fines imposed from the utility providers as a result of shrub or plant material overgrowth will be the responsibility of the Contractor party to the Agreement.
7. The Contractor shall trim and keep all shrubs and bushes at reasonable height, species specific. Bushes and shrubs shall be maintained to prevent any line of sight conditions. Bushes and shrubs shall be maintained at least two blocks below the top of any block wall. Extreme pruning is not permitted. Natural appearance is preferred, avoid “balling” shrubs or unnecessarily “squaring off” plant material.
8. Gutters, curbs, and sidewalks shall be cleaned off weekly and debris removed from the site. Gutters, curbs and sidewalks shall be free of leaves, dirt, debris, trash, and any invasive items. Weeds between the pavement and gutter, gutter and sidewalk, and between sidewalk sections shall be removed weekly.
9. Drainage facility integrated within the landscaped area shall be kept clear and all trash and debris shall be removed weekly.
10. Illegal signs (such as “For Sale,” “For Rent,” “Yard Sale,” or other advertisement signage) shall be removed weekly and disposed of in appropriate refuse or recycling containers.
Irrigation:
1. The Contractor shall maintain the complete irrigation system in an operable condition.
2. The Contractor shall adjust water application to compensate changes in weather. Irrigation systems shall be shut off when rain occurs, unless an automatic rain sensing device is installed on the system. If the controller is to be shut down, it is suggested that a “shut-down window” be programmed into the controller, rather than a complete shutdown. Valves shall be exercised at least once a month for a minimum of three (3) minutes to maintain valve diagram health.
3. The Contractor shall make a dedicated effort not to overwater plant material and cause plant decline. Contractor shall make a dedicated effort to abide by Riverside County Ordinance 859.2.
4. The Contractor shall set run times for the irrigation system for the promotion of good health, vigor, and color throughout the year. Plant stress/decline presumed to be from lack of irrigation will be grounds for immediate termination of the Agreement. Existing controllers set up on ET based irrigation scheduling shall remain ET based (weather based). Existing controllers ET based controllers not set up on ET shall be within six (6) months of the site being turned over to Contractor. Irrigation technicians shall be familiar with ET, precipitation rates (PR), distribution uniformity (DU), flow rates, and other major irrigation terms and procedures.
5. Irrigation labor shall be restricted to work done on the premises only. Providing parts and delivery are the responsibility of the Contractor.
6. Any repair or replacement needed to damaged equipment as a result of the Contractor’s negligence shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor, and shall be made at the Contractor’s expense.
7. On a weekly basis, the Contractor shall verify, inspect, clean and repair, as required, all irrigation heads for full coverage and efficiency. Inspections and repairs shall be made by an irrigation professional well versed with basic and advanced irrigation principles. Irrigation truck shall be equipped with irrigation tools and supplies to fix the most common sprinklers, valves, and other irrigation components with a standalone truck.
Tree Maintenance:
1. At no additional cost and in compliance with ANSI A300 Standards, the Contractor shall remove damaged branches as well as re-stake and support trees when necessary (all stakes and ties are to be placed so no chafing of bark occurs).
2. Contractor shall check all guys and ties frequently to prevent girding.
3. Contractor shall irrigate as required to maintain adequate growth rate and appearance.
4. Contractor shall remove branches blocking street signs as needed. Contractor shall notify the City if a tree and/or branch is causing a known line of sight issue or blocking a sign.
5. Tree trimming above twelve (12) feet will not be the responsibility of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Tree trimming shall be restricted to line of sight, low hanging branches, or other necessity (crown cleaning, thinning, raising). Any tree trimming needed above twelve (12) feet should be reported to the City immediately.
6. Tree stake removal shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible to remove all tree stakes under direction of the City’s landscape inspector. The Contractor may also remove tree stakes if it noticed that they are no longer serving their purpose as support to the tree, or if it is noticed that the tree stakes are impeding the growth or health of the tree.
7. At no additional cost, the Contractor shall plant new or replacement trees at the City’s request (not to exceed four trees per month). The City will furnish a new tree (species TBD) not to exceed 24” box to be planted. For replacement trees, this work would not include the removal of the existing tree.
B. GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICES APPLICABLE TO GROUPS OF SITES
The General Scope of Services Applicable to Groups of Sites is identified in Exhibit B Turf Maintenance:
1. The Contractor shall mow and edge all turf areas weekly, paying particular attention to adjacent hardscape, utility devices, trees and shrubs to achieve an overall even appearance.
2. The Contractor shall over-seed any dead or bare areas to promote an overall pleasant appearance.
3. The Contractor shall adjust the irrigation for the turf areas to maintain health, appearance, public safety, and reducing vandalism.
Multi-Purpose Trail Maintenance:
1. The Contractor shall maintain a safe and level grade on all trails. Frequency will vary depending on location.
2. Mechanical response such as hula-hoeing, blading with tractor, may be required if weeds are deemed “out of control,” at no additional cost to the City. Weed whacking should be limited to areas without windows. Contractor is encouraged to be proactive in managing weed population with weed abatement. Frequency of weeding will vary depending on location.
3. Any patching or replacement of decomposed granite shall be of like kind to existing. An approved stabilizer product shall be used in order to maintain a compact and uniform surface.
Fence Maintenance:
1. The Contractor shall replace rails, caps with screws and posts with like white vinyl fencing/wood fencing/concrete fencing components on an as needed basis, at an additional cost subject to a time and materials charge format.
2. All new posts shall be placed in the same locations as the ones removed and back- filled with ready-mix concrete approximately eighteen (18) inches below grade level with clean soil placed on top, level with the ground/mounded of formed at the top of concrete to disperse water and to prevent excessive water saturation.
3. Contractor shall promptly clean-up any debris resulting from the fence repair/replacement operation. All debris from the fence repair/replacement operation shall be cleaned up each day before the work crew leaves the site.
4. The work area shall be kept safe at all times until all operations are completed. Under no circumstances shall the accumulation of debris be permitted which may create a hazard to the public or Contractor’s employees.
5. Damaged fencing shall be removed as soon as possible and properly disposed of properly at no additional cost to the City.
C. SCOPE OF SERVICES APPLICABLE TO SPECIFIC SITES
Zones Name Location Specifics Scope of Work
LLMD
4 Limonite/Camino Real/Van
Buren
Location 1 - Limonite Landscaped median and
northerly landscaped
parkway and multi-purpose
trails on Limonite Avenue
between Camino Real and
Pedley Road. Landscaped
parkways on the southerly
side of Limonite Avenue
between Baldwin Avenue
and Pedley Road.
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10) times per
year
3. Concrete
swales within
median shall be
cleaned monthly
prior to rain
events where
precipitation is
estimated to
exceed ¼ -inch.
- Monthly
Location 2 - Camino Real Landscaped median on
Camino Real between
Parkland Club Drive and
300 feet northerly of
Lakeside Drive. Parkway
landscaping on the
Westside of Camino Real
between Limonite Avenue
and Lakeside Drive.
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10) times per
year.
Location 3 - Van Buren Landscaped median on Van
Buren Blvd. between the
Santa Ana River and Clay
Street. Vegetated bio-swale
on the west parkway
adjacent to the animal
shelter.
1. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10) times per
year.
2. Concrete
swales within
median shall be
cleaned monthly
prior to rain
events where
precipitation is
estimated to
exceed ¼ -inch.
- Monthly
Location 4 - Limonite Landscaped median and
landscaped parkway on
both sides of Limonite
Avenue from Camino Real
to Pacific Avenue.
Landscaped parkway along
both side of Limonite
Avenue frontage road from
Limonite to exit on
Limonite (except private
front yards). Landscaping
including turf within the
Pat Merit Dog Park (trash
emptied three (3) times a
week and restocked with
dog bags, provided by
City).
1. Turf
Maintenance-
Weekly
2. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year
3. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10) times per
year.
4. Concrete
swales within
median shall be
cleaned monthly
prior to rain
events where
precipitation is
estimated to
exceed ¼ -inch.
- Monthly
Location 5 - Limonite Landscaped slopes on
Limonite Avenue from
Pedley Road to Collins
Street, adjacent to Van
Buren Boulevard.
1. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10)
5 Sky Country
Location 1C - Landscaped
Entrances
Maintenance of twelve (12)
entrances estimated at
4,516 square feet.
1. The twelve
(12) entryways
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
2 weeks.
2. Contractor
will be
responsible for
addressing
complaint calls
on an ongoing
basis.
Location 1D - Landscaped
Entry Monuments
Maintenance of four (4)
monument corners estimate
at 6,204 square feet.
1. The four (4)
corner
monuments
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
2 weeks.
2. Contractor
will be
responsible for
addressing
complaint calls
on an ongoing
basis.
6 Bellegrave Landscaped parkway on
the southeasterly side of
Bellegrave Avenue
1. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
between the tract
boundaries southwesterly
of the intersection of
Mission Boulevard and
Felspar Avenue.
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be
complete
weekly.
7 Etiwanda/Van Buren Landscaped
parkway/corner on the
southeast and southwest
corners of Van Buren
Boulevard and Etiwanda
Avenue intersection and
the median located on Van
Buren Boulevard between
Etiwanda Avenue and the
railroad trestle.
1. Turf
Maintenance -
Weekly
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be
completed
eleven (11)
times per year.
9 Country Village/Philadelphia Landscaped parkway on
the south side of
Philadelphia Avenue
between Country Village
Road and channel.
Landscaped parkway of
Country Village Road
between Philadelphia
Avenue and channel.
1. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
completed
eleven (11)
times per year.
14 Armstrong/Sierra Parkway landscaping along
the northwesterly and
southeasterly parkways of
Armstrong Road between
Sierra Avenue and County
line; southeasterly
parkways on Armstrong
Road between Sierra
Avenue and 34th Street;
easterly parkway on Sierra
Avenue between Karen
Lane and Armstrong Road;
easterly and westerly
parkways on Sierra Avenue
between Armstrong Road
and 30th Street. Parkway
landscaping along the
easterly side of 34th Street
between Armstrong Road
and Florine Avenue;
northwesterly and
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year
2. Fence
Maintenance -
As needed
3. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed
eleven (11)
times per year.
Concrete swales
adjacent to walk
southeasterly parkways on
Florine Avenue from 33rd
Street to 34th Street;
southeasterly parkways on
Florine Avenue between
34th Street and cul-de-sac.
Formalized parkway
landscaping around the
pump station between
Apple and Florin, and 30th
and 33rd Streets.
trails or
sidewalks shall
be cleaned
weekly to insure
proper flow.
16 Crestmore/Mission Landscaped median and
landscaped parkways on
both sides of Mission
Boulevard between
Crestmore Road and the
Santa Ana River.
Landscaped median,
sidewalks, streetscape, and
landscaped ‘pockets’
located on Mission Blvd.
between Crestmore Road
and Riverview Drive.
Landscaped median and
landscaped parkways on
both sides of Crestmore
Avenue between Mission
Blvd. and Capary Road.
Landscaped median,
northeasterly landscaped
parkway and streetscape,
and southwesterly
streetscape along Mission
Blvd. from Riverview
Drive to La Rue Street.
Landscaped median on
Mission Blvd. between La
Rue Street to edge of
existing improvements.
Landscape Median from La
Rue Street to Valley Way.
1. Turf
Maintenance -
Weekly
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed ten
(10) times per
year.
3. This site shall
be reviewed
twice a week for
trash.
17 Etiwanda/Iberia Landscaped median on
Etiwanda Avenue between
State Highway 60 and
Iberia Street. Landscaped
parkway on the eastern side
of Etiwanda Avenue
between parking lot of
restaurant to north of Iberia
Street.
1. Turf
Maintenance -
Weekly
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed
eleven (11)
times per year.
21 Castlerock/Galena/Rutile
Location 1 Multi-purpose trail located
on the south side of Galena
Street between Castlerock
Road east to tract
boundary; Parkway
landscaping located on
Castlerock Road south of
Galena Street; Multi-
purpose trail located behind
and parallel to Berkshire
Drive between Steve
Avenue to flood control
channel (from block wall to
school fence wide); multi-
purpose trail located
parallel to Castlerock Road
between Berkshire Drive
and Kings Court.
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year.
2. Fence
Maintenance -
As needed
3. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed
within two (2)
weeks
regardless of
time of year.
Location 2 Multi-purpose trail located
on the west side of Rutile
Street between
Woodbridge lane south to
tract boundary (past
Fairford Street); parkway
landscaping located on the
west side of Rutile Street
between Woodbridge Lane
south to tract boundary
(past Fairford Street);
median located on Fairford
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance) -
3 times per
year.
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
Street; multi-purpose trail
located behind and parallel
to Berkshire Drive between
Steve Avenue to Rutile
Street (from block wall to
private owners’ fence
wide).
complete loop
completed
within two (2)
weeks
regardless of
time of year.
Location 3 Multi-purpose trail located
on the south side of Galena
Street between Castlerock
Road and flood control
channel; Parkway
landscaping located on the
south side of Galena Street
between Castlerock Road
and flood control channel;
multi-purpose trail located
parallel to Castlerock Road
between Kings Court and
Galena Street; landscaped
slope and vines adjacent to
block wall located parallel
to Castlerock Ro. Between
Kings Court and Galena
Street.
1. Multi-
Purpose Trail
Maintenance - 3
times per year.
2. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed
within two (2)
weeks
regardless of
time of year.
34 Lakeside Dr. Landscaped parkway along
the northerly and southerly
sides of Lakeside Drive,
between Club House Drive
and El Palomino Drive.
1. The general
trimming cycle
and schedule for
shrubs and
groundcover
shall be a
complete loop
completed
within two (2)
weeks
regardless of
time of year.
A Dollar Storage (Limonite
Median)
Landscaped median along
Limonite Avenue
approximately 550 feet
west of Etiwanda Avenue
west to the Dollar Self
Storage property limit.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks.
E Cold Storage Landscaped parkway
approx. 600ft down the
west side of Hall Avenue
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
from El Rivinio and
approx. 200 ft. down the
south side of El Rivinio
from Hall Avenue
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks.
G Avalon Court Landscaped parkway
approx. 650 ft down the
north side of 36th St from
Aalon St. Landscaped
parkway approx. 450 ft
down the west side of
Avalon St from 36th St.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks.
I Shops at Bellegrave Landscaped parkway
approx. 260ft down the
south side of Bellegrave
Avenue from Etiwanda
Avenue and approx. 230 ft.
down the east side of
Etiwanda Avenue from
Bellegrave Avenue.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks.
K Jurupa Estates Landscaped parkway
approx. 875ft down the
north side of Jurupa Road
between Pyrite Street and
Tyrolite Street. And
approx. 255 ft. down the
west side of Pyrite Street in
between Jurupa Road and
Galena Street. Width of
right of way on Pyrite St is
approx. 15ft from the street
(base of hill).
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks.
L Flabob Landscape parkway
approx. 360 ft down the
west side of Rubidoux
Blvd. from Tilton Ave.,
300 ft down the east side
of Rubidoux Blvd. from
Tilton Ave. to 42nd St.
Approx 12,000 sq.ft of
landscape parkway on
42nd St and Twining St,
including 4,000 sq.ft
pedestrian walkway
finished with pavers on
42nd St.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks.
M Pilot Flying J Landscaped parkway
approx. 550ft down the east
side of Etiwanda Avenue
from Mission Boulevard.
And 900ft down the north
side of Riverside Drive
from Etiwanda Avenue.
Monument corner at
Mission Boulevard and
Etiwanda Avenue estimate
at 5,200 square feet.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks.
N Midland Carriers Landscaped parkway
approx. 350ft down the
northeast side of Rubidoux
Boulevard from 26th
Street. And approx. 700ft
down the northwest side of
26th Street from Rubidoux
Boulevard.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks
S Vernola Marketplace
Apartments
Landscaped median on Pats
Ranch Road between 65th
Street and Ivory Street.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks
T Rubidoux Industrial Center Landscape parkway on
east side of Rubdioux
Blvd., half way between
26th St and 28th St.
Includes landscape
parkway on Stockdale Ct.
Approx 11,000 SF
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
U Ice Box Landscaped parkway
approx. 175ft down the
northwest side of Rubidoux
Boulevard, approx. 330ft
from 26th Street. And
approx.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks
W Hudson Landscaped parkway on
the south side of 59th St
between Hudson St and
Scheelite St, north side of
60th St between Hudson
St. and Sheelite St, and
west side of Hudson St.
between 59th St and Black
Thorn St. Approx 8,835
SF.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
X Horizon Business Park Landscaped parkway
approx. 900ft down the
west side of Etiwanda
Avenue from Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road.
Approx. 575ft on the north
side of Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road, between
Etiwanda Avenue and
Parkhurst Street. Approx.
900ft down the west side of
Parkhurtst Street from
Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road. Median island on
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
between Parkhurst St and
Etiwanda Ave.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks
Y Wheeler Upfitter Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Market St
in between Rubidoux
Blvd and Hall Ave., the
north side of Hall Ave in
between Market St and
24th St, and the west side
of 24th st in between
Rubidoux Blvd and Hall
Ave. Approx 29,000 SF of
landscape.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
Z Aqua Mansa Commerce
Park
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
AA DC Fuels Landscaped parkway on
north side of Cantu-
Galleano Rd. between
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
Wineville Rd and I-15
north onramp. Approx
13,000 SF of landscape
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
FF Montecito Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Mission
Blvd between Agate St
and La Bonita, Agate St
between Mission Blvd
and Wild Pony Dr.
Approx 8,200 SF.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
four (4) weeks
CFD
13-001 Bellegrave A
GP 13-001 Rancho Del Sol Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Bellegrave
Ave, at Avendia del
Ranchos, approx. 515ft
southeast on the north side
parkway of Bellegrave
Avenue. And approx. 450ft
northwest on the northside
of Bellegrave Avenue.
Eastern parkway of
Avenida del Ranchos
between Camino
Miramontes and Bellegrave
Ave. Median island on
Avenida del Ranchos
between Camono
Miramontes and
Bellegrave.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Cantu -
Galleano Ranch Road, at
C. del sol, approx. 170ft
east on the southside
parkway of Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road, and approx.
700ft west on the southside
parkway of Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road. Eastern and
Western landscaped
parkway on C. del sol.
Median island on D. del
sol.
Landscaping of the
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
infiltration basin off
Avenida del Ranchos.
GP 13-011 Sage Pointe Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Bellegrave
Ave, at Graphite Creek
Road, approx. 300ft
southeast on the north side
parkway of Bellegrave
Avenue. And approx. 830ft
northwest on the northside
of Bellegrave Avenue.
Eastern and western
parkway of Graphite Creek
Road between Camino
Miramontes and Bellegrave
Ave.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road, at
Arnold Lane, approx. 570ft
east on the southside
parkway of Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road, and approx.
460ft west on the southside
parkway of Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road. Eastern
landscaped parkway on
Arnold Lane between
Graphite Creek Road and
Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road. Western landscaped
parkway on Arnold Lane
between Conner Circle and
Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road. Median island on
Arnold Lane.
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
off Camino Miramontes.
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
GP 12-038/39 Turnleaf Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Bellegrave
Ave from Wineville
Avenue to Firebush Street.
Approx. 150ft northwest of
Firebush Street on the
north side of Bellegrave
Ave past Firebush Street.
Eastern parkway of
Firebrush Street from
Bellegrave Avenue to
Violas Court. Median
island on Firebush Street at
the the intersection of
Furebush St and Bellegrave
Ave.
Landscaped parkway on
the west side of Wineville
Ave from Bellegrave
Avenue to Redbud Lane.
Approx. 170ft north of
Redbud Lane on the west
side of Wineville Avenue.
Eastern and western
parkway of Redbud Lane.
Median Island on Redbud
Lane.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road,
starting approx. 730ft west
of Wineville Ave and
spanning approx. 920ft.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin off
Forsythia St.
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
GP 13-017 Serrano Ranch Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Bellegrave
Ave from Wineville
Avenue to Firebush Street.
Approx. 150ft northwest of
Firebush Street on the
north side of Bellegrave
Ave past Firebush Street.
Eastern parkway of
Firebrush Street from
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
Bellegrave Avenue to
Violas Court. Median
island on Firebush Street at
the intersection of
Furebush St and Bellegrave
Ave.
Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Etiwanda
Ave from Bellegrave
Avenue to Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road. Northern and
Southern landscaped
parkway on Ryder Road,
from Helen Bell Way to
Etiwanda Avenue.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road
spanning approx. 1300ft
east from Etiwanda Ave.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin off Dane
Drive.
LD 17-442 Barrington Place Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Wineville
Avenue spanning approx.
2000ft south from Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road.
Northern and southern
parkway of Longield Lane
from Prairie Run Road to
Wineville Avenue.
Northern and southern
parkway of Pansy Place
from Prairie Run Road to
Wineville Avenue.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road
spanning approx. 700ft east
from Wineville Avenue.
Includes pedestrian path
from Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road and Green
Meadow Lane.
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
13-002 Harvest Village I Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Pats Ranch
Road from Limonite Ave
to Boca Place.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Boca
Place from Pats Ranch
Road to Wineville Avenue.
Landscaped parkway on
the west side of Wineville
Avenue from Boca Place to
Limonite Avenue. Northern
and southern parkways on
Harvest Villages Way from
Peregrine Drive to
Wineville Avenue. Median
Islands on Harvest Villages
Way from Perigrine Drive
to Wineville Avenue.
Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Limonite
Ave from Pats Ranch Road
to Wineville Avenue.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin on the
south end of Peregrine
Drive.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin on the
north end of Peregrine
Drive, north end of the
park.
Landscaping of the
bioretention basin adjacent
to Limonite Avenue, north
side
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
15-044 Harvest Village II Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Pats Ranch
Road from Boca Place to
Park Center Drive.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of Park
Center Drive from Pats
Ranch Road to Wineville
Avenue. Eastern parkway
on Skimmer Drive between
Canvasback Way and Park
Center Drive. Median
Islands on Park Center
Drive between Pats Ranch
Road and Wineville Ave.
Landscaped parkway on
the west side of Wineville
Avenue from Park Center
Drive to Boca Place.
Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Boca
Place from Pats Ranch
Road to Wineville Avenue.
Eastern and western
landscaped parkway on
Kingbird Way from
Goldfinch Ct/Sanderling
Way to Boca Place.
Median Islands on Boca
Place from Pats Ranch
Road to Wineville Avenue.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin off
Sanderling Way (Harvest
II).
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin off
Avvocet Dr., west side of
park (Harvest II).
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
13-027 Harvest Village III Landscaped parkway on
the east side of Pats Ranch
Road from Park Center
Drive to Shearwater Drive.
Southern landscaped
parkway on Verdin Way
from Pats Ranch Road to
Starling Drive. Northern
landscaped parkway on
Verdin Way from Pats
Ranch Road to Cormorant
Court. Median Island on
Verdin Way.
Landscaped parkway on
the south side of
Shearwater Drive from Pats
Ranch Road to Wineville
Avenue. Median Island on
Shearwater Drive between
Pats Ranch Road and
Wineville Ave.
Landscaped parkway on
the west side of Wineville
Avenue from Shearwater
Drive to Park Center Drive.
Landscaped parkway on
the north side of Park
Center Drive from Pats
Ranch Road to Wineville
Avenue. Eastern and
western landscaped
parkway on Starling Drive
from Crossbill Way to Park
Center Drive.
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
off Crossbill Way and Tree
Sparrow Court (Harvest
III).
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
off Starling Drive at north
end of Mountain Vista Park
(Harvest III).
1. This site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
External trails
and fencing to
be maintained
by other
entities.
GP 14-002 Mission Estates Northside landscaped
parkway along Jurupa
Road to tract boundaries
west of Bethel Road and
east of Bethel Road.
Southside landscaped
parkway along Mission
Boulevard from Sikh
Temple Way to tract
boundaries east of Caleb
Street. Eastside landscaped
parkway along Sikh
Temple Way from Mission
Boulevard to tract
boundaries.
Landscaping of the
infiltration basin off Jude
Street and Hernandez
Street.
Landscaping of the
bioretention basin off
Bethel Road
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks. External
trails and
fencing to be
maintained by
other entities.
15-001 Riverbend South side streetscape on
68th St, approx. 4,000 ft..
Multi-purpose trail not
included.
Landscaping of the
Infiltration basin located
off Avenida del Ranchos
(Rancho Del Sol).
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks. External
trails and
fencing to be
maintained by
other entities.
GP 15-002 Skypark The north side parkway of
Loring Ranch Road
between the Flood Control
Channel and Oldenburg
Street. The southside
parkway along Mission
Rock Way between
Manhart Circle and the end
of Mission Rock Way. East
and west side of the
entrance on Skypark Way
entering from both Mission
Rock Way and Loring
Ranch Road. Includes
median islands.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
and surrounding area
located at the end of
Mission Rock Way.
GP 16-001 Quarry Northside landscaped
parkway along 34th Street
from tract boundaries to
Armstrong Road. Eastside
landscaped parkway, multi-
use trail not included.
Westside Landscaped
parkway along Armstrong
Road from 34th Street to
29th Street.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every four (4)
weeks. External
trails and
fencing to be
maintained by
other entities.
Landscaping of the sand
filter basin and the
surrounding area located at
the intersection of
Reflection Way and Sunset
Way.
Landscaping of the sand
filter basin located at the
intersection of Monarch
Way and Viceroy Way.
GP14-003 Granite Ridge/Cantera Northside landscaped
parkway along Granite Hill
Drive to tracked boundaries
west of Soto Ave and east
of Boulder Dr. Eastside
parkway along Soto
Avenue to tracked
boundary just past
Microlite Street.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Entry monument on
northeast corner of Granite
Hill Drive and Gypsum
Drive.
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
and surrounding area
located off Gypsum Drive.
Landscaping of the
extended detention basin
and surrounding area
located off Beryl Way.
GP 18-002 Stone Landscape parkway on
the east side of Stone Ave
between Martingale Dr
and end of road.
Multipurpose trail on the
north and south side of
Settlers Ct. from Stone
Ave to end of Settlers Ct.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Multipurpose trail from
the top of Settler Ct. to
end of property line.
Landscape of filtration
basin on the corner of
Stone Ave and Settlers
Ct.
19-001 Paradise Knolls Landscape parkway on
south side of Limonite
Ave. between Downey St
and approx. 600 ft west of
Beach St., west side of
Downey St. from
Limonite Ave to 64th St.,
north and south side of
Rancho Jurupa Rd from
Downey St to Ardennes
St., north side of
equestrian way from
Downey St. to Ardennes
St.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Landscape in median on
Limonite Ave from
Downey St. to approx.
600 ft west of Beach St.
Multipurpose trail on
west side of Downey St
from Limonite Ave to 64th
St.
Landscape of infiltration
basin on
19-012 Shadow Rock See Maintenance Exhibit
Landscape of five (5)
sand filter basins, one (1)
infiltration basin and four
(4) debris basins.
1. This site
shall be
maintained on
an interval not
to exceed every
five (5) weeks.
City Facilities City Hall
8930 Limonite Avenue
Streetscape on southside of
Limonite Ave between
Archer Street and entrance
to shopping center.
Approx. 375ft of
streetscape down east side
of Archer Street from
Limonite Avenue.
Landscape on the north end
of the building facing
Limonite Avenue. Islands
in parking lot.
Northside landscaped
parkway along 34th Street
from tract boundaries to
Armstrong Road. Eastside
landscaped parkway, multi-
use trail not included.
Westside Landscaped
parkway along Armstrong
Road from 34th Street to
29th Street.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Jurupa Valley Operations
Center (JVOC)
5293 Mission Boulevard
Streetscape on the northern
side of Mission Boulevard
between Daly Avenue and
Crestmore Road. Eastern
side of Daly Avenue
between Mission
Boulevard and 37th Street.
South side of 37th Street
between Daly Avenue and
Crestmore Road. Western
side of Crestmore Road
between Mission
Boulevard and 37th Street.
Small segment of
landscaped area in parking
lot.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Eddie D. Smith Senior Center
5888 Mission Boulevard
Landscape on the northern
portion of building on
Mission Boulevard.
Landscape on western side
and southern side of
building located within the
parking lot. Landscape on
eastern and western ends of
parking lot.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
I-15 Interchange Landscape on the east side
on-ramp and off-ramp of
the I-15 interchange at
Limonite Ave. to include
the sidewalk on Limonite
Ave.
1. This site shall
be maintained
on an interval
not to exceed
every five (5)
weeks.
Van Buren Median Island The landscaped median on
Etiwanda Avenue from
Limonite Avenue to
Bellegrave Avenue.
1. The site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
Ediwanda Median Island The landscaped median on
Etiwanda Avenue from
Limonite Avenue to
Bellegrave Avenue.
1. The site shall
be maintained
eleven (11)
times per year.
Special District Landscaping Services RFP
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
Service Site Streetscape/Median
Landscape (Monthly)
Stormwater Basin
Landscape (Monthly)
Total Annual Cost
Zone 4 $32,700.59 N/A $392,407.08
Zone 5 $916.53 N/A $10,998.36
Zone 6 $273.10 N/A $3,277.20
Zone 7 $1,042.42 N/A $12,509.04
Zone 9 $1,914.16 N/A $22,969.92
Zone 14 $5,330.97 N/A $63,971.64
Zone 16 $12,694.47 N/A $152,333.64
Zone 17 $972.45 N/A $11,669.40
Zone 21 $1,217.80 N/A $14,613.60
Zone 34 $664.34 N/A $7,972.08
A - Limonite Avenue Median (Dollar
Storage)
$251.05 N/A $3,012.60
E – Cold Storage $165.49 N/A $1,985.88
G – Avalon Court $658.08 N/A $7,896.96
I – Shops at Bellegrave $31.15 N/A $373.80
K – Jurupa Estates $464.72 $383.33 $10,176.60
L – Flabob $426.36 $383.07 $9,713.16
M – Pilot Flying J $340.83 N/A $4,089.96
N – Midland Carriers $155.04 N/A $1,860.48
S – Vernola Marketplace Apartments $277.29 N/A $3,327.48 T – Rubidioux Industrial Center $637.20 N/A $7,646.40
U – Ice Box $41.50 N/A $498.00
W – Hudson $440.28 N/A $5,283.36
X – Horizon Business Park $619.87 N/A $7,438.44
Y – Wheeler Upfitter $888.14 N/A $10,657.68
Z – Aqua Mansa Commerce Park $2,612.02 N/A $31,344.24
AA – DC Fuels $535.87 N/A $6,430.44
FF - Montecito $387.65 N/A $4,651.80
13-001 Bellegrave A $19,905.79 $4,531.50 $293,247.48
14-001 Harvest $8,561.81 $2,789.10 $136,210.92
14-002 Mission Estates $2,892.34 $1,857.82 $57,001.92
14-003 Granite Ridge/Cantera $2,179.63 $1,959.77 $49,672.80 15-001 Riverbend $2,262.33 $2,021.45 $51,405.36
15-002 Skypark $588.82 $899.90 $17,864.64
16-001 Quarry $1,229.18 $1,284.38 $30,162.72
18-002 Stone $674.58 $430.75 $13,263.96
19-001 Paradise Knolls $2,099.71 N/A $25,196.52
19-012 Shadow Rock $30,221.92 $4,135.78 $412,292.40
Ediwanda Median Island $5,460.31 N/A $65,523.72
Van Buren Median Island $8,223.85 N/A $98,686.20
I-15 Interchange $1,345.00 N/A $16,140.00
City Hall $0 N/A $0
Jurupa Valley Operations Center $0 N/A $0
Eddie D. Smith Senior Center $0 N/A $0
Total Service Costs $152,304.64 $20,676.85 $2,075,777.88
ADDITIONAL WORK RATES
Jurupa Valley Special Districts
Labor and Equipment Rates- Non Trade Prevailing Wage
Labor Classification REGULAR TIME OVERTIME SUNDAY & HOLIDAY Area Manager $ 75.00 $ 112.50 $ 150.00
Superintendent $ 57.50 $ 86.25 $ 115.00
Foreman/Irr. Supervisor $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $ 100.00
Laborer 1/Irr. /Spray Tech $ 43.25 $ 64.88 $ 86.50
Laborer 2 $ 40.13 $ 60.19 $ 80.25
Laborer 3 $ 32.50 $ 48.75 $ 65.00
Equipment
Flat Bed Dump Truck $ 13.20
Utility Body Truck $ 12.10
Pickup $ 9.90
Trailer $ 2.20
High Weed Mower $ 10.00
Weed Eater $ 2.20
Blower $ 1.10
Chainsaw $ 3.30
Hedge Trimmer $ 2.20
Tree planting Amended 7-1-2023
24” Box $ 488.75
36” Box $ 1380.00
Water Tree/Per Week $ 14.95
Other equipment, as needed, to be rented at cost plus 10%
Materials - Cost Plus 10%
Subcontracts- Cost Plus 15%
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.E
ACCEPTANCE OF SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PACIFIC AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (42nd STREET T O LIMONITE
AVENUE)
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council accept $690,120 in Senate Bill 821, Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program, funding for The Pacific Avenue Transportation Project, Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) Project #23115; and
2) Authorize the City Ma nager to execute Agreement No 24 -62-016-00 with the Riverside County Transportation Commission in substantially the form and format attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND
Senate Bill 821 (“SB 821”), the Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program, is provided through the Transportation Development Act ( “TDA”), funded through a ¼ cent of the general sales tax collected statewide. The TDA provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: the Local Transportation Fund ( “LTF”) and the State Transit Assistance ( “STA”). The LTF provides funding for essential transit and commuter rail services, TDA Article 3/SB 821 and planning. Each year, two percent of the LTF revenue is available for use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects through TDA Article 3/SB 821 program.
ANALYSIS
Capital Project 23115, Pacific Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Ph. 2, spanning from 42nd Street to Limonite Avenue will improve Pacific Avenue by constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Additionally, the project will rehabilitate existing pavement and
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
add new signage and striping to establish a new bicycle route. These improvements will build upon the previous Pacific Avenue projects north of 42nd street and will complete the route from Sierra Avenue to Limonite Avenue.
The Project will construct 3,500 linear feet of sidewalk and create a new bicycle route to link with the citywide bikeway system. The project also includes constructing new Americans with Disabilities Act compliant crosswalks, installin g bulb outs, signage and striping, and reconstructing any driveways as needed.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The SB 821 grant will cover $690,120 of the project’s current balance in the CIP of $1,399,000. Construction of the project will take place in FY 2 024/2025. The CIP for FY 2023/2024 will allocate a total of $708,880 Measure ‘A’ funds in addition to the $690,120 SB 821 grant funds . Approving the SB 821 grant funds will ensure the project has sufficient funds.
This project does not require any General Fund Monies.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Do not accept the SB 821 grant funds.
2) Provide alternative direction to staff.
******************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *******************************
Attachment A
Agreement No. 24-62-016-00
17336.00005\41471305.2
1 AGREEMENT No. 24-62-016-00
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING UNDER SB 821 BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM
(Transportation Development Act Article 3; Senate Bill 821) This Funding Agreement (“AGREEMENT”) is entered into as of _______, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (“RCTC”) and City of Jurupa Valley (“RECIPIENT”). RCTC and RECIPIENT may be referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. RCTC is a county transportation commission created and existing pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Sections 130053 and 130053.5.
B. Under RCTC’s SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program (“PROGRAM”), cities and counties in the County of Riverside are notified of the availability of PROGRAM funding and a call for projects (“CALL FOR PROJECTS”) is anticipated to be issued biennially by RCTC.
C. On February 6 th, 2023, a CALL FOR PROJECTS was published by RCTC seeking applications for FY 2023/24 PROGRAM funding, which applications were reviewed in accordance with the applicable evaluation criteria included in the CALL FOR PROJECTS.
D. Based on the application attached as Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by this reference, RECIPIENT has been selected to receive PROGRAM funding for its proposed Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (“PROJECT”).
E. Funding for the PROJECT shall be provided pursuant to the terms contained in this AGREEMENT and pursuant to applicable PROGRAM policies adopted by RCTC, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding recitals and the mutual covenants and consideration contained herein, the Parties mutually agree as follows:
1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the above recitals are true and correct, and hereby incorporate those recitals by this reference into the AGREEMENT.
2. RCTC Funding Amount. RCTC hereby agrees to distribute to the RECIPIENT, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, a sum not to exceed Six Hundred Ninety Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($690,120), to be used exclusively for reimbursing the RECIPIENT for eligible expenses as described herein (“FUNDING AMOUNT”). RECIPIENT acknowledges and agrees that the FUNDING AMOUNT may be less than the actual and final cost of the PROJECT, which final costs are the sole responsibility of RECIPIENT, and RCTC will not contribute PROGRAM funds in excess of the maximum authorized in this 17336.00005\41471305.2
2 Section 2 unless otherwise mutually agreed to in writing by the PARTIES. In the event the FUNDING AMOUNT is not fully utilized by RECIPIENT for the PROJECT, the unused FUNDING AMOUNT must be returned to RCTC within ninety (90) ninety days of a written request by RCTC unless RECIPIENT can demonstrate in writing, subject to written approval by RCTC in its sole discretion, the following: (i) valid reason for why PROJECT costs were significantly lower than the estimate included in RECIPIENT’s attached application for funding, and (ii) written proposal for how any unused FUNDING AMOUNT will be used for a proposal to support the PROJECT or other use that supports the goals and requirements of the PROGRAM.
2.1 Eligible Project Costs. Reimbursement for PROJECT costs (“REIMBURSEMENT”) may only include those items expressly allowed for under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (California Public Utilities Code section 99200 et seq .), which provides that funding shall be allocated for the construction, including related engineering expenses, of facilities based on the PROGRAM policies adopted by RCTC, provided that such items are included in the scope of work included in the application, attached as Attachment 1 (“SCOPE OF WORK”). All PROJECT costs not included in the SCOPE OF WORK and not expressly permitted under Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act and the PROGRAM policies shall be considered ineligible for REIMBURSEMENT. In the event the SCOPE OF WORK needs to be amended, RECIPIENT shall submit a scope change request electronically via RCTC’s online tracking and reporting system known as the Rivtrack system and accessible at https://rivtrack.rctc.org/ (“Rivtrack system”). The electronically submitted scope change request must include the reasons for the requested change and confirmation that costs associated with the proposed amendment are eligible for PROGRAM reimbursement. Such request is subject to written approval by RCTC, in RCTC’s sole discretion.
In the event of any ambiguity between this AGREEMENT, PROGRAM policies, and applicable law, the following order of precedence will govern: (1) applicable law; (2) PROGRAM policies; (3) this AGREEMENT. In the case of any conflict between this Agreement and any of its attachments, the body of this Agreement shall govern. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of a conflict, the most stringent requirement shall govern, unless prohibited by applicable law or otherwise agreed upon by RCTC.
2.2 Timing for Project Completion. In accordance with the PROGRAM policies attached hereto as Attachment 2, RECIPIENT has thirty-six (36) months to complete the PROJECT from the date of this AGREEMENT, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the PARTIES. If the PROJECT is not completed within 36 months, RCTC shall have the sole discretion to delete the PROJECT from the PROGRAM and reprogram the funding for future approved PROGRAM projects. RECIPIENT will not be reimbursed until the PROJECT is accepted as complete by RCTC following the submission of the PROGRAM funding claim form completed electronically via the Rivtrack system. In the event additional time is needed for the completion of the PROJECT, RECIPIENT may submit a time extension request electronically via the Rivtrack system. Before and after PROJECT photographs must be uploaded with the CLAIM FORM upon PROJECT completion, as well as copies of paid invoices and any other backup requested for repayment and audit purposes.
2.3 Increases in Project Funding. The FUNDING AMOUNT may, at RCTC’s sole discretion, be augmented with additional PROGRAM funds and local agency match funds proportionate to the amounts included in Section 3 if there is a FUNDING AMOUNT balance and the RECIPIENT provides justification as to the reason for the funding 17336.00005\41471305.2
3 increase. Any such increase in the FUNDING AMOUNT must be approved in writing by RCTC’s Executive Director and RCTC shall be under no obligation whatsoever to approve any increase in the FUNDING AMOUNT. No such increased funding shall be expended to pay for any PROJECT work already completed.
2.4 Cost Savings. In the event that bids or proposals for the PROJECT are lower than anticipated, or there are cost savings for any other reason, the FUNDING AMOUNT shall be reduced through an amendment to the AGREEMENT. RECIPIENT shall inform RCTC of any cost savings and any cost savings shall be returned to RCTC or may be reprogrammed with written approval by RCTC for other RECIPIENT projects that align with the PROGRAM.
No PROGRAM funding may be used for projects not approved by RCTC. If RECIPIENT provides a local match commitment and there are cost savings on the PROJECT, RCTC will still be reimbursed at the matching ratio as presented in the Project application despite such cost savings in accordance with PROGRAM policies.
2.5 No Funding for Temporary Improvements. Only segments or components of improvements that are intended to form part of or be integrated into the PROJECT may be funded by PROGRAM funds. No improvement(s) which is/are temporary in nature, including but not limited to temporary lanes, curbs, or drainage facilities, shall be funded with PROGRAM funds except as needed for staged construction of the PROJECT.
2.6 Review and Reimbursement by RCTC. Upon submission into Rivtrack, of the final detailed invoice from the RECIPIENT clearly documenting work completed and corresponding costs, RCTC may request additional documentation or explanation of the SCOPE OF WORK costs for which reimbursement is sought. Undisputed amounts shall be paid by RCTC to the RECIPIENT within thirty (30) days. In the event that RCTC disputes the eligibility for reimbursement of all or a portion of an invoiced amount, the Parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute. Additional details concerning the procedure for the RECIPIENT’s submittal of invoices to RCTC and RCTC’s consideration and payment of submitted invoices are set forth in Attachment 2.
2.7 Recipient’s Funding Obligation to Complete the Work; Limitation of RCTC Obligations. In the event that the PROGRAM funds allocated to the SCOPE OF WORK represent less than the total cost of the PROJECT, RECIPIENT shall be solely responsible for providing such additional funds as may be required to complete the PROJECT. RCTC has no obligation with respect to the safety of any work performed under the SCOPE OF WORK, for the PROJECT, or at a PROJECT site. Further, RCTC shall not be liable for any action of RECIPIENT or its contractors relating to the condemnation of property undertaken by RECIPIENT or construction related to the PROJECT.
2.8 Recipient’s Obligation to Repay Program Funds to RCTC. In the event it is determined, whether through a post-completion audit or otherwise, the PROJECT was not completed in accordance with the PROGRAM requirements or this AGREEMENT, RECIPIENT agrees that any PROGRAM funds distributed to RECIPIENT for the PROJECT shall be repaid in full to RCTC. The Parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to establish a reasonable repayment schedule and repayment mechanism which may include, but is not limited to, withholding of Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenues, if applicable. RECIPIENT acknowledges and agrees that RCTC shall have the right to withhold any Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenues due to RECIPIENT, in an amount not to exceed the total of the PROGRAM funds distributed to RECIPIENT, and/or initiate legal action to compel repayment, 17336.00005\41471305.2
4 if the RECIPIENT fails to repay RCTC within a reasonable time period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days, including any good faith negotiations, from receipt of written notification from RCTC that repayment is required due to failure to comply with the PROGRAM policies or this AGREEMENT.
2.9 Records Retention and Audits. RECIPIENT shall retain all PROJECT records in an organized manner for a minimum of three (3) years following completion of the PROJECT. PROJECT records shall be made available for inspection by RCTC upon request. If a post PROJECT audit or review indicates that RCTC has provided reimbursement to the RECIPIENT in an amount in excess of the FUNDING AMOUNT set forth in Section 2, or has provided reimbursement of ineligible PROJECT costs, the RECIPIENT shall reimburse RCTC for the excess or ineligible payments within thirty (30) days of notification by RCTC. This Section 2.9 does not supersede any rights or remedies provided to RCTC under Section 2.8 or applicable law.
3. Recipient’s Local Match Contribution. RECIPIENT shall provide at least Seven Hundred Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Dollars ($708,880) of funding toward the SCOPE OF WORK, as indicated in RECIPIENT’S application attached as Attachment 1 and submitted to RCTC in response to its CALL FOR PROJECTS. RECIPIENT costs related to (i) preparation and administration costs related to invoices, billings and payments; (ii) any RECIPIENT fees attributed to the processing of the SCOPE OF WORK; and (iii) expenses for items not included within the attached SCOPE OF WORK shall be borne solely by the RECIPIENT and shall not qualify towards RECIPIENT’s local match requirement in this Section 3.
4. Term: The term of this AGREEMENT shall be from the date first herein above written until:
(i) the date RCTC formally accepts the PROJECT as complete, pursuant to Section 2.2; (ii) termination of this AGREEMENT pursuant to Section 14; or (iii) RECIPIENT has fully satisfied its obligations under this AGREEMENT. All applicable indemnification and insurance provisions of this AGREEMENT shall remain in effect following the termination of this AGREEMENT.
5. Recipient Responsibilities. RECIPIENT shall be responsible for all aspects of the PROJECT, in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, including: (i) development and approval of plans, specifications and engineer’s estimate in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations and building codes; obtaining any necessary environmental clearances; right of way acquisition; and, obtaining all permits required by impacted agencies prior to commencement of the PROJECT; (ii) all aspects of procurement, contracting, and administration of the contracts and claims for the PROJECT; (iii) all construction management of any construction activities undertaken in connection with the PROJECT, including surveying and materials testing; and, (iv) development of a budget for the PROJECT and SCOPE OF WORK prior to award of any contract for the PROJECT, taking into consideration available funding, including PROGRAM funds.
6. Indemnification. RECIPIENT shall defend, indemnify and hold RCTC, its officials, governing board members, officers, employees, agents, and consultants free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property, persons or government funding agency, including wrongful death ,arising out of or incident to any intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions of the RECIPIENT, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and 17336.00005\41471305.2
5 contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT, the PROJECT or the SCOPE OF WORK. RECIPIENT’S obligation to indemnify includes without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees and other related costs and expenses of defense. RECIPIENT shall defend, at its own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants in connection with this AGREEMENT.
RECIPIENT shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants in any such suits, actions or other legal proceedings, including any settlement. RECIPIENT’s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds. The indemnity obligation shall not apply to the extent of any negligence or willful misconduct of RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants. This section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
7. Expenditure of Funds by Recipient Prior to Execution of Agreement. RECIPIENT may commence the Project starting July 1, 2023, and costs incurred following such date will be eligible for reimbursement under this AGREEMENT, provided they otherwise meet the requirements herein, and provided that this AGREEMENT is executed no later than October 1, 2023.
8. Compliance with Applicable Laws and Insurance. RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including public contracting laws, requirements for any local state or federal funding used, and records retention and performance reporting requirements concerning the SCOPE OF WORK and PROJECT, which applicable laws and regulations shall be passed on to contractors by RECIPIENT as applicable. RECIPIENT shall have the responsibility of making sure the appropriate amounts of insurance are included in all applicable agreements for the construction of the PROJECT and RCTC shall be named as an Additional Insured on all insurance certificates obtained for the completion of the PROJECT.
PROJECT insurance funds shall be looked to first for the repayment of any claims determined to have merit.
9. Representatives of the Parties. RCTC’s Executive Director, or his or her designee, shall serve as RCTC’s representative and shall have the authority to act on behalf of RCTC for all purposes under this AGREEMENT. RECIPIENT’s representative shall be the individual identified in the Project application as RECIPIENT’S representative to RCTC.
RECIPIENT’S representative, or designee, shall have the authority to act on behalf of RECIPIENT for all purposes under this AGREEMENT and shall coordinate all activities with RCTC concerning the SCOPE OF WORK under the RECIPIENT’s responsibility.
RECIPIENT shall work closely and cooperate fully with RCTC’s representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over or an interest in the PROJECT.
10. Monitoring of Progress by RCTC. RECIPIENT shall allow RCTC’s designated representative, or designee, to inspect or review the progress of the work at any reasonable time with prior written notice by RCTC. RCTC may request that the RECIPIENT provide RCTC with progress reports concerning the status of the SCOPE OF WORK and PROJECT completion.
11. Binding on Successors in Interest. Each and every provision of this AGREEMENT shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of the Parties. Due to the 17336.00005\41471305.2
6 specific obligations contemplated herein, this AGREEMENT may not be assigned by any Party hereto except with the prior written consent of the other Party.
12. Independent Contractors. Any person or entities retained by RECIPIENT or any contractor shall be retained on an independent contractor basis and shall not be employees of RCTC.
Any personnel performing services on the PROJECT shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the RECIPIENT or contractor, whichever is applicable. The RECIPIENT or contractor shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services on the SCOPE OF WORK and as required by law. The RECIPIENT or contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations concerning such personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation insurance.
13. Conflicts of Interest. For the term of this AGREEMENT, no member, officer or employee of RECIPIENT or RCTC, during the term of his or her service with RECIPIENT or RCTC, as the case may be, shall have any direct interest in this AGREEMENT, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
14. Termination. This AGREEMENT may be terminated for cause or convenience as further specified below.
14.1 Termination for Convenience. Either RCTC or RECIPIENT may, by written notice to the other party, terminate this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part, for convenience by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof.
14.2 Effect of Termination for Convenience. In the event that RECIPIENT terminates this AGREEMENT for convenience, RECIPIENT shall, within 180 days, repay to RCTC in full all PROGRAM funds provided to RECIPIENT under this AGREEMENT. In the event that RCTC terminates this AGREEMENT for convenience, RCTC shall, within 90 days, distribute to the RECIPIENT PROGRAM funds in an amount equal to the aggregate total of all unpaid invoices which have been received from RECIPIENT regarding the SCOPE OF WORK for the PROJECT at the time of the notice of termination; provided, however, that RCTC shall be entitled to exercise its rights under Section 2.6, including but not limited to conducting a review of the invoices and requesting additional information from RECIPIENT. This AGREEMENT shall terminate upon receipt by the non-terminating party of the amounts due it under this Section 14.
14.3 Termination for Cause. Either RCTC or RECIPIENT may, by written notice to the other party, terminate this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part, in response to a material breach hereof by the other Party, by giving written notice to the other Party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. The written notice shall provide a thirty (30) day period to cure any alleged breach. During the 30 day cure period, the Parties shall discuss, in good faith, the manner in which the breach can be cured.
14.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. In the event that RECIPIENT terminates this AGREEMENT in response to RCTC's uncured material breach hereof, RCTC shall, within ninety (90) days, distribute to the RECIPIENT PROGRAM funds in an amount equal to the aggregate total of all unpaid invoices which have been received from RECIPIENT regarding the SCOPE OF WORK for the PROJECT at the time of the notice of termination. In the event that 17336.00005\41471305.2
7 RCTC terminates this AGREEMENT in response to the RECIPIENT's uncured material breach hereof, the RECIPIENT shall, within one hundred eighty (180) days, repay to RCTC in full all PROGRAM funds provided to RECIPIENT under this AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding termination of this AGREEMENT by RCTC pursuant to this Section 14.4, RCTC shall be entitled to exercise its rights under Section 2.6, including but not limited to conducting a review of the invoices and requesting additional information. This AGREEMENT shall terminate upon receipt by the terminating Party of the amounts due it under this Section 14.4.
14.5 No Program Funding. In the event that RCTC determines there are inadequate PROGRAM funds for whatever reason, RCTC shall have the right to immediately terminate the AGREEMENT with written notice to RECIPIENT. In the event that RCTC terminates this AGREEMENT under this Section 14.5, RCTC shall, within 90 days, distribute to the RECIPIENT PROGRAM funds in an amount equal to the aggregate total of all unpaid invoices which have been received from RECIPIENT regarding the SCOPE OF WORK for the PROJECT at the time of the notice of termination; provided, however, that RCTC shall be entitled to exercise its rights under Section 2.6, including but not limited to conducting a review of the invoices and requesting additional information from RECIPIENT.
14.6 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section 14 are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this AGREEMENT.
15. Notice. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be effective upon receipt by the other Party. All notices and communications between the Parties to this AGREEMENT shall be addressed as set forth below and provided by any of the following methods (i) personally delivered; (ii) sent by electronic mail, with a subject line clearly identifying this AGREEMENT, read receipt requested, and a cc: provided to the identified staff; (iii) sent by first-class mail, return receipt requested; or (iv) sent by overnight express delivery service with postage or other charges fully prepaid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notices of dispute or termination sent by electronic mail must be followed by hard copy mailed notice to be effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, invoices and requests for changes to the SCOPE OF WORK, shall be submitted through the Rivtrack system as specified in this AGREEMENT.
TO RCTC: TO RECIPIENT:
Anne Mayer
Executive Director
RCTC
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, California 92501
Phone: (951) 787-7141
e-mail: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Rod Butler
City Manager
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183
(951) 332-6464
[email protected]
Any party may update its address and contact information by providing written notice of the new information to the other Parties in accordance with this Section 15. 17336.00005\41471305.2
8 16. Prevailing Wages. RECIPIENT is alerted to the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wages where the SCOPE OF WORK or any portion thereof is determined to be a “public work,” as defined therein.
RECIPIENT shall ensure compliance with applicable prevailing wage requirements by any person or entity hired to perform the SCOPE OF WORK or any portion thereof falling within the definition of “public work.” RECIPIENT shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless RCTC, its officers, employees, consultants, and agents from any claim or liability, including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from any failure or alleged failure to comply with California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. on the PROJECT.
17. Equal Opportunity Employment. The Parties represent that they are equal opportunity employers and they shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.
18. Entire Agreement. This AGREEMENT embodies the entire understanding and agreement between the Parties pertaining to the matters described herein and supersedes and cancels all prior oral or written agreements between the Parties with respect to these matters. Each Party acknowledges that no Party, agent or representative of the other Party has made any promise, representation or warranty, express or implied, not expressly contained in this AGREEMENT, that induced the other Party to sign this document. Modifications to this AGREEMENT shall be in the form of a written amendment executed by authorized representatives of the Parties to be bound.
19. Governing Law; Venue and Severability. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by, and be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. If any portion of this AGREEMENT is found to be unenforceable by a court of law with appropriate jurisdiction, the remainder of the AGREEMENT shall be severable and survive as binding on the Parties.
20. Attorneys’ and Other Fees. If any legal action is initiated for the enforcement/interpretation of this AGREEMENT, or because of any alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this AGREEMENT, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees, witness fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled as determined by a court of law or appointed decider under alternative legal proceedings.
21. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
22. Section Headings and Interpretation. The section headings contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect in any way the interpretation of any of the provisions contained herein. The AGREEMENT shall not be interpreted as being drafted by any Party or its counsel.
23. No Waiver. Failure of RCTC to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions in this AGREEMENT shall not be deemed a waiver of 17336.00005\41471305.2
9 such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power provided under applicable law.
24. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this AGREEMENT.
25. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all which together will constitute but one agreement.
26. Form of Signatures. A manually signed copy of this Agreement which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Agreement for all purposes. This Agreement may be signed using an electronic signature.
27. Survival. All rights and obligations under this AGREEMENT that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this AGREEMENT shall survive any such expiration or termination.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
17336.00005\41471305.2
1010
SIGNATURE PAGE
TOTO
AGREEMENT NO. 2424-6262-01616-0000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING UNDER SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
FACILITIES PROGRAM
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this AGREEMENT to be signed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.
RCTC
By:____________________________
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
RECIPIENT
[INSERT NAME]
By:______________________________
Name: _________________________
Title: __________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Best, Best & Krieger LLP
By: _________________________
General Counsel to RCTC
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: _____________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ____________________________
17336.00005\41471305.2
Attachment 1
ATTACHMENT 1
(RECIPIENT APPLICATION FOR FUNDING)
Questionnaire Tab
Email address:
Project Name:
Has this Project been previously awarded in a past SB 821 Cycle? NoNo
Yes, in 17-18 FY Cycle
Yes, in 19-20 FY Cycle
Yes, in 21-22 FY Cycle
Lead Agency:
Memorandum of Understanding
By October 1, 2023, awardees will execute the Project MOU with the Commission. To streamline the process, please provide the name and contact information or the individual who will be the signatory on the MOU.
This is typically the City Manager, City Engineer, or Public Works Director.
MOU Signatory *
Title: *
Email address: *
Project Contact Person
Provide contact information for Project's contact person. This could be the Public Works Director, the Project Manager, or other City/County Staff.
Project Contact is the same as current user
Project Contact Person: *
Title: *
Email address: *
Phone Number: *
Project Overview
Project Type (check all that apply) *
Bicycle Project
Pedestrian Project
Multi-use Trail Project
Non-Infrastructure/Plan
Project Locate in a Disadvantage Community, per SB-535? * Yes
NoNo
Partial
Does the proposed project include any of the following (check all that apply)? * Curb
Gutter
Driveway Ramp
Project does not include any of the above
Is the benefit provided for the exclusive use of bicyclist/pedestrian? * Yes
NoNo
Project Application Tab
Project Number: 000187 Agency: City of Jurupa
Valley
Project Type: Bicycle Project, Pedestrian Project
Project Name: Pacific Avenue Active
Transporation Project
Status: Submitted To RCTC
A. Scope of Work (500 Characters)
498 of 500 Characters
B. Funding
Enter the project costs for PA/ED, PS&E, ROW, Construction and Local Match in the fields provided below. The gray fields contain formulas that will calculate the Total Project Cost, SB 821 Request, and the Percentage Splits.
PA & ED:
PS & E:
ROW:
Construction:
Administration:
Total Project
Cost:
Agency Split %
Local Match:
SB 821
Request:
RCTC Split %
Local Match:
SB 821
Request:
C. Schedule
For completed phases, provide supporting documentation such as copies of environmental clearance, title sheet of 100% plans with engineer’s stamp, or right of way clearance and attach in section J.
PA & ED:
PS & E:
ROW:
Construction:
Close out:
D. Project Background & Project Description
Describe the project background and the existing conditions of the larger project area and or project vicinity.
Discussion can include background information on current roadway configuration, missing bike and pedestrian facilities, and importance of project to local active transportation users. If possible, upload photographs of existing conditions.
Describe the project in its entirety. Include the purpose and need, benefit, and location of the project. Provide a map showing existing and proposed project improvements. If available, upload typical cross-sections showing vehicular lane widths, active transportation facilities width, and any landscaping or lighting features in section J.
Project Description. The Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT) Phase II continues the City’s efforts to create a complete active transportation corridor within a disadvantaged community. Pacific Avenue has one lane each way, median turn lanes, on-street parking/loading, and bike route arrows and signs. The corridor currently has varied pedestrian facilities, with some places having shoulders while others force pedestrians out into the street. A bicycle route exists on Pacific Avenue north of the project site, then suddenly ends at 42nd Street. The proposed project modifies Pacific Avenue with infill curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the west side of the street between 45th and De La Vista, as well as curb, gutter, and a sidewalk on the east side between 42nd Street and Limonite Avenue. PAAT continues the progress of Phase I, a marked bike route, within the corridor creating another link in the citywide bikeway system. This project completes the half-mile gap within the Pacific/Sierra bike route, connecting the bicycle corridor from Armstrong Road to Limonite Avenue. Pedestrian bulb outs will be added alongside crosswalks at 45th Street, Vista De Oro, and De La Vista to create high visibility crosswalks and provide safer pedestrian crossings. Three flashing stops signs installed at 45th street will be added as an increased safety measure for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists alike. PAAT is currently a two-lane street that was planned to be widened to a four-lane street within the existing 80- to 84-foot right-of-way. Pacific Avenue provides access to eight local schools (Pacific Avenue Academy of Music, Rustic Lane Elementary, Mission Middle, Nueva Vista High, West Riverside Elementary, Peralta Elementary, Camino Real Elementary, and Rubidoux High School) and experiences substantial walking activity during school start/end periods. However, along Pacific Avenue, students walk along the edge of the street, sharing the road with motorists.
Separating the walking facilities from the vehicles provides a substantially safer environment for pedestrians and the marked bike route reminds drivers that Pacific Avenue is a multi-modal corridor and caution when driving is essential. Location. PAAT is located along the southern portion of Pacific Avenue and will begin at 42nd street moving south to Limonite Avenue. Phase II continues where phase one ended, resulting in the entire limits of Pacific Avenue providing full pedestrian and bicyclist access once completed. The proposed project is located in the Rubidoux neighborhood on the northeastern side of Jurupa Valley, within the two-mile radius slightly crossing the Santa Ana River into the City of Riverside.
More specifically, the project runs alongside Rubidoux High School and Pacific Avenue Academy of Music, making it a key walkway for students of all ages. PAAT allows safer pedestrian and bicycle access to a large variety of parks, schools, and commercial centers in the surrounding area.
Within the 2-mile radius of the project site there are nine Census Tracts, with eight qualifying as Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) according to CalEnviroScreen 4.0. This area contains some of the most disadvantaged neighborhoods within the state of California and the City of Jurupa Valley. The combined census tracts are home to 49,020 residents, who will benefit from the PAAT improvements. The Census Tracts included in PAAT are: • CT 401.01 - 95th DAC percentile • CT 401.02 - 86th DAC percentile • CT 402.01 - 78th DAC percentile • CT 402.03 - 91st DAC percentile • CT 402.04 - 96th DAC percentile • CT 403.01 - 86th DAC percentile • CT 403.02 - 52nd DAC percentile • CT 403.03 - 86th DAC percentile • CT 302.00 - 88th DAC percentile Existing Conditions. Sidewalks along Pacific Avenue are intermittent and unreliable for pedestrian use, and no bicycle routes currently exist in the proposed segment. Sidewalks are provided in some areas where street widening has previously occurred, but there are substantial sections missing and are not provided along most of the east side of the street. Gravel shoulders provide walkways in the gap areas. This limited shoulder space forces pedestrians to walk alongside moving vehicles with no barriers between them and the road, or walk along a gravel pathway, which is does not accommodate people of all abilities. Additionally, there are no bicycle facilities along this section of Pacific Avenue. The eastern side of the corridor has little to no shoulder, while the western side is uneven and presents many obstacles for bicyclists. The lack of facilities along this corridor, along with multiple destinations nearby, makes it an ideal location to provide greater pedestrian and bicycle access for residents, which in turn promotes active transportation and a better quality of life via less vehicle emissions and a healthier lifestyle. Purpose and Needs. Field reviews of the street during school start and end periods confirmed that many students walk along the edge of the travel lanes because vehicles are parked along the shoulder of the street either by residents or parents picking-up or dropping off students. Many families in the Rubidoux area of the City do not have resources to drive children to school and as a result they walk/bike to school, resulting in disadvantaged children being at more risk than others as they walk to school. The project will significantly improve safety while encouraging more people to walk or bike to nearby schools, stores, and parks. In addition to being a school route, the corridor is an important arterial in the city and is actively used during both weekdays and weekends outside of school hours. Table 1 shows the non-motorized activity along Pacific Avenue from 2021. Table 1: Non-Motorized Activity Data Location Count Pacific Avenue Weekday/ Saturday - Bicycles = 18 / 46 Weekday/ - Pedestrians = 685 Count data represents 24-hour activity The City estimates that with the completion of PAAT, pedestrian and bicycle counts along this corridor will increase as the facilities provide safer and more convenient access to the surrounding area. Allowing more citizens the opportunity to choose active transportation will reduce the use of single occupancy vehicles, which contributes to lowering greenhouse gas emissions and creating a healthier community. The project completes a bicycle route from the southernmost point (Limonite Avenue) northernmost point (Armstrong Road) of this corridor, creating a connective network which encourages bicyclists to utilize these routes. Benefits. Completion of PAAT will create a continuous pedestrian walkway along Pacific Avenue and allow for safer pedestrian and bicycle access to the wider Jurupa Valley. In particular, the project prevents children from walking on roads and uneven ground on their way to and from school. The project also raises Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards within the corridor, allowing residents of all abilities to travel more safely. In addition to developing pedestrian access within neighborhoods, PAAT encourages active use of public transportation by making first- and last-mile walking and biking safer. The Attachment B contains maps and photos showing existing conditions and proposed improvements.
E. Destinations Served (2 points for each destination served, max 14 points) Briefly summarize and list all the destinations served by the proposed project. Provide a project vicinity map identifying all the destinations served by the proposed project within a ¾ mile or a 2-mile radius. Destinations are schools or higher education facilities, commercial centers, municipal or any other civic centers, medical facilities, and recreational centers.
For pedestrian projects, the destinations need to be within ¾ mile radius to be eligible. For bicycle or multi-use trail projects, destinations need to be within a 2-mile radius. Each destination served will receive 2 points each.
On the map, provide a ¾ mile buffer or a 2-mile buffer surrounding the project site. Maps without the marked buffer will receive half of its eligible points.
There are 23 essential destinations within a 2-mile radius of the proposed project, including eight education centers, nine recreational facilities, two public transportation routes, two commercial centers, and two municipal service facilities. This area of Jurupa Valley contains a wide range of essential locations constantly exposed to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. These destinations are outlined in Table 2. Table 2: 23 Destinations Served by PAAT Education Centers • Rubidoux High School • West Riverside Elementary • Nueva Vista High School • Mission Middle School • Peralta Elementary School • Rustic Lane Elementary School • Camino Real Elementary School • Pacific Avenue Academy of Music Recreation Facilities Centennial Park • Pat Merit Dog Park • Shadow Rock Park • Mount Rubidoux Park • Rancho Jurupa Park • Rancho Jurupa Sports Park • Louis Rubidoux Nature Center • Jensen Alvarado Historic Ranch • Veterans Memorial Park Community Center • Eddie D. Smith Senior Center • The Cove Water Park Commercial Centers • Mission Boulevard • Valley Way Civic Facilities • Riverside County Department of Social Services • Louis Rubidoux Library • Riverside Transportation Routes 49 & 29 Notable destinations include the Louis Rubidoux Nature Center that hosts ongoing volunteer workdays, tree planting events, and farm-to-fork dinners in the on-site pecan grove. In addition, Mount Rubidoux is a cultural landmark and boasts 3.5 miles of paved roads and additional hiking trails which are routinely used by bicyclists and pedestrians since 2009. The Eddie D.
Smith Senior Center is a 0.75 mile walk from Pacific Avenue offering workshops, social events, and recreation activities in English and Spanish for those over 60 years old. Finally, Pacific Avenue Academy of Music provides specialized musical education for children in kindergarten through 6th grade and is located directly within the project limits. See Attachment B for the Destinations Served Map.
F. Safety (max 15 points)
Describe the extent to which the proposed project will increase safety for the non-motorized public. Additionally, explain any safety enhancement features included in the project scope, such as rectangular rapid flashing beacons, bicycle box (see https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/). Include information about project characteristics such as: no existing shoulder within project limits, no existing/planned sidewalk or bikeway adjacent to the project, etc. Applicants may wish to consider including documented pedestrian/bicycle collision or injury history, most current and valid 85th percentile speed of motorized traffic in project limits, photos of existing safety hazards the project will address, existing pedestrian/bicycle traffic counts, student attendance figures for school served by project.
Additionally generate a collision heat map for the project site using collision data from the last ten years. Heat map can be generated using the ATP Maps & Summary interface from TIMS (https://tims.berkeley.edu/) or Crossroads.
Upload map in section J.
Discussions with residents during the City's Safe-Routes-to School walk audits confirmed that this area has a significant number of lower income families who are very dependent on walking and biking for transportation throughout the day. While sidewalks have improved pedestrian conditions in many areas, the lack of bicycle facilities still exists. Over 5,000 students within the 2-mile radius of the project are served by PAAT, details of the student attendance are detailed in Table 3. Table 3 2022-2023 Student Enrollment of Schools Served Rubidoux High School = 1,407 West Riverside High School = 600 Nueva Vista High School = 203 Mission Middle School = 694 Peralta Elementary School = 524 Rustic Lane Elementary = 541 Camino Real Elementary = 751 Pacific Avenue Academy of Music = 307 Total Students Served = 5,027 Increases Safety/Safety Features A review of the TIMS collision data indicates a significant issue with pedestrian and bicycle safety in this area and near the various schools with 77 pedestrian collisions occurring in the project area since 2011. Summaries of the collision data are provided in Attachment B. Data showed that six collisions occurred on Pacific Avenue involving bicyclists. This indicates that bicycle travel exists along this corridor, despite the lack of facilities for riders. A pedestrian accident along Pacific Avenue occurred along the side of the street segments where the sidewalk ends.
As shown in the hot spot figure, there is a high concentration of injury collisions near the project limit’s intersections. This emphasizes the need for improved intersection treatments for pedestrians to minimize the amount of time it takes for a pedestrian to cross the street and to provide traffic control, like the existing all-way stop and the proposed bulb outs. The Engineering and Traffic Survey from April 2023 found that the 85th percentile speed along Pacific Avenue was 42 miles per hour which is 7 miles per hour above the speed limit. The survey also found that Pacific Avenue has a collision rate of 5.26, which is significantly higher than the average statewide collision rate for similar facilities (1.18). There is currently shoulder parking on the east side of Pacific Avenue which prevents pedestrians from properly seeing incoming (possibly speeding) vehicles. The project improvements will shorten the crossing, which will improve sight distance and visibility for both motorized and non- motorized users. By closing the existing gaps in the sidewalk, establishing a route, and adding intersection improvements, pedestrians will be discouraged from crossing the corridor at an unmarked area and instead, use the proposed infrastructure that promotes their safety.
Speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, not providing enough clear space between cars and bicycles, and improper pedestrian crossings are all behaviors that have caused collisions along Pacific Avenue. Providing segregated facilities for most users will help prevent encroachment by one user into the space of another thereby reducing the potential for collisions at many locations. Three flashing stops signs will be added at 45th street to provide increased awareness of pedestrian crossing at this intersection. Finally, providing better defined lanes (as a result of painting the sharrows) a reduction in the upper percentile speed along Pacific Avenue is also expected. Improved safety within the corridor is expected as a result of: • Providing separated walkways for pedestrians to remove the need to walk alongside the roadway with motorists (80% crash reduction factor); • Providing bulb outs for pedestrians to stand in, which provides a better line of sight for motorists; • Providing flashing stop signs to remind motorists of pedestrians (35% crash reduction factor); • Painting sharrow bike markings to remind motorists of the shared corridor (35% crash reduction factor); and • Painting crosswalk striping to create designated space for pedestrians (40% crash reduction factor). Lack of ADA access along Pacific Avenue prevents some residents from using the corridor and a lack of separated sidewalks and designated bike routes limits the ability of small children to safely walk and bike. The provision of sidewalks and ADA access will allow all users to more safely travel along Pacific Avenue to access destinations along the corridor and access those connecting facilities beyond it. See Attachment B for the Safety Maps and TIMs collision data.
G. Multimodal Access (1 point each, max 6 points)
In a project vicinity map, identify all the bus routes, Metrolink stations, park-and-ride facilities, bicycle lanes, sidewalks or crosswalks improved by the proposed project within a ¾ mile or a 2-mile radius.
For pedestrian projects, these amenities need to be within ¾ mile radius to be eligible. For bicycle or multi-use trail projects, amenities need to be within a 2-mile radius. Each amenity will receive 1 point.
On the map, provide a ¾ mile buffer or a 2-mile buffer surrounding the project site. Maps without the marked buffer will receive half of its eligible points. Upload map in section J.
Below, discuss how the project along with its nearby amenities encourage multi-modalism. Briefly summarize and list all the bus stops, Metrolink Stations, park-and-ride facilities, missing bicycle or sidewalks, or crosswalks enhanced by the proposed project and indicate if the items are existing or planned.
The City of Jurupa Valley continues to create a complete and interconnected multi-modal transit system that provides residents with the convenience of nearby amenities while promoting active modes of transportation as a viable alternative to vehicles. Completion of the proposed project will allow citizens to use a connected pedestrian network and bicycle route as they move south or east to service-rich areas. PAAT encourages residents to walk or ride to the 21 nearby bus stops served by Riverside Transit Routes 49 and 29. The Riverside Transit bus route within the project radius traverses through several nearby cities, allowing citizens convenient access to the surrounding area. Riverside Transit Bus Stops (21 stops in total) • Route 29 (Eastvale through Riverside) o Limonite/Peralta Place o Limonite/Ave Juan Bautista o Limonite/Pacific Ave o Limonite/Riverview Dr o Riverview/42nd St o Tilton/Briggs o Tilton/Rubidoux o Rubidoux/ 34th • Route 49 (Riverside to Glen Avon) o Mission/El Camino Real o Mission/Formosa o Mission/Soto o Mission/Valley Way o Mission/Goal West o Mission/Opal o Mission/Pacific o Mission/La Rue o Mission/Riverview o Mission/Avalon o Mission/Rubidoux o Mission/Wallace o Mission/Crestmore In addition, bike routes are significantly lacking in the region. Minimal bike routes exist within the 2-mile radius of the project, with the nearest bike-friendly road being Mission Boulevard with intermittent designated bicycle facilities. There are currently no bicyclist connections to the major recreational area of Mount Rubidoux or Shadow Park. The completion of PAAT would complete a significant bicycle-friendly corridor and allow the City to move forward with other bicycle facility projects in the area. While the project installs pedestrian crosswalks striping at La Vista, Vista de Oro, and 45th St, it additionally benefits several major crosswalks at the nearby intersections at Limonite Avenue, Mission Boulevard, and Valley Way. The missing pedestrian and bicycle facilities that would benefit from PAAT are detailed below. Benefited Active Transportation Facilities • Sidewalks from 42nd Street to Mission Boulevard (construction planned for summer 2023) • Bike route from 42nd Street to Mission Boulevard (construction planned for summer 2023) • Crosswalks at: o La Vista (planned) o Vista de Oro (planned) o 45th St (planned) o Limonite Avenue (existing) o Mission Boulevard (existing) o Valley Way (existing) See Attachment B for the Multimodal Access Map.
H. Matching Funds (max 10 points)
Local Match:
SB 821 Request:
50% 1010
45% 9
40% 8
35% 7
30% 6
25% 5
20% 4
15% 3
10% 2
5%5% 1
0%0% 0
I. Population Equity (max 5 points)
Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Population Equity Points
J. Attachments
Upload attachments indicated from previous sections.
4_Att A_Local Match Commitment -
Signed.pdf
Commitment to Local Match
8_Att E_ROW_Certification.pdf ROW Clearance
7_Att D_CEQA NOE_Pacific.pdf Environmental Document
6_Att
C_Engineers_Estimate_Final.pdf
Project's Engineers Estimate
5_Att
B_Maps_and_Visuals_Final.pdf
Destinations Served Project Map, Multimodal Access Project Map, Project Background & Project Description Map, Safety Project Map
K. Certification
I certify that the information presented herein is complete and accurate.
Name: Andrea Mejia
Date: 04/27/2023
Title: Senior Management Analyst
ITEM NO. UNIT PRICE (FIGURES)
1 1 LS $ 100,000.00
2 2 EA $ 2,000.00
3 1 LS $ 50,000.00
4 1 LS $ 50,000.00
5 1 LS $ 50,000.00
6 1,740 SF $ 20.00
7 3,040 LF $ 30.00
8 1,000 SF $ 30.00
9 2,000 SF $ 25.00
10 12,100 SF $ 25.00
11 11 EA $ 8,000.00
12 300 LF $ 1,050.00
13 11 EA $ 1,000.00
14 45 LF $ 1,500.00
15 1 LS $ 80,000.00
16 1 EA $ 5,000.00
subtotal $ 1,329,000.00
contingency $ 70,000.00
1,399,000.00
Engineer's Estimate
Pacific Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements South of 42nd St. to Limonite Ave.
BIDDER:
(Contractor Name)
BASE BID ITEMS AS FOLLOWS
DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS ESTIMATED QUANTITY/UNIT TOTAL COST (FIGURES) Mobilization $ 100,000.00
Temporary Construction Project Identification Sign $ 4,000.00 Stormwater and Non- Stormwater Pollution Control and
Implementation
$ 50,000.00
Work Area Temporary Traffic Control and Implementation $ 50,000.00 Clearing, Grubbing and Miscellaneous Removals $ 50,000.00 Remove Existing PCC Flatwork $ 34,800.00 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A- 6) $ 91,200.00 PCC Cross-Gutter and Spandrel $ 30,000.00 PCC Residential Driveway $ 50,000.00
PCC Sidewalk $ 302,500.00
PCC Curb Ramp $ 88,000.00
4' Retaining Wall $ 315,000.00
Notes
1. Construction Surveying included on all items TOTAL $ Type "D" Loop Detectors $ 5,000.00
Install New Mailbox $ 11,000.00
Remove and Replace Existing Fence and Gate $ 67,500.00 Signing and Striping $ 80,000.00
Jurupa ValleyJurupa Valley
Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT)Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT)Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT)Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT)Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT)Pacific Avenue Active Transportation Project (PAAT) Phase II Visual GalleryPhase II Visual GalleryPhase II Visual Gallery
PROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT LOCATION
2-Mile
Radius
PROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTIONPROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTIONPROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTIONPROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTIONPROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTIONPROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION Legend
New Bike Route
New Sidewalk
PAAT completes the final stretch of bicycle and pedestrian facilities PAAT completes the final stretch of bicycle and pedestrian facilities PAAT completes the final stretch of bicycle and pedestrian facilities PAAT completes the final stretch of bicycle and pedestrian facilities PAAT completes the final stretch of bicycle and pedestrian facilities from Sierra Avenue through Pacific Avenue. Sidewalks will be installed from Sierra Avenue through Pacific Avenue. Sidewalks will be installed from Sierra Avenue through Pacific Avenue. Sidewalks will be installed from Sierra Avenue through Pacific Avenue. Sidewalks will be installed from Sierra Avenue through Pacific Avenue. Sidewalks will be installed within the current gaps east and west sides, as well as bike routes within the current gaps east and west sides, as well as bike routes within the current gaps east and west sides, as well as bike routes within the current gaps east and west sides, as well as bike routes within the current gaps east and west sides, as well as bike routes south to Limonite Avenue. The project is directly connected to two south to Limonite Avenue. The project is directly connected to two south to Limonite Avenue. The project is directly connected to two south to Limonite Avenue. The project is directly connected to two south to Limonite Avenue. The project is directly connected to two schools, allowing safer transportation for children in the surrounding schools, allowing safer transportation for children in the surrounding schools, allowing safer transportation for children in the surrounding schools, allowing safer transportation for children in the surrounding schools, allowing safer transportation for children in the surrounding area.
PROPOSED DESIGN PLANSPROPOSED DESIGN PLANSPROPOSED DESIGN PLANSPROPOSED DESIGN PLANS The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety The project involves installing new sidewalks and completing the bike route along Pacific Avenue. Additional safety measures such as crosswalk striping, bulb outs, and ADAmeasures such as crosswalk striping, bulb outs, and ADAmeasures such as crosswalk striping, bulb outs, and ADA-compliant ramps will be installed for bicyclist and compliant ramps will be installed for bicyclist and compliant ramps will be installed for bicyclist and pedestrian safety.
DESTINATIONS SERVEDDESTINATIONS SERVED
DESTINATIONS SERVED
Legend
Project Site
Commercial
Centers
Schools
Recreation
Facilities
Civic Facilities
PAAT serves a
disadvantaged
community with:community with:
8 Schools
2 Commercial Centers2 Commercial Centers
11 Recreational
CentersCenters
4 Civic Facilities
2-Mile
Radius
Veteran's
Memorial
Park
Camino Real
Elementary
SchoolSchool
Peralta
Elementary
SchoolSchool
Pat
Merritt
Dog Park
Nueva Vista
High School
Pacific
Avenue
Academy
of Music
Rustic Lane
Elementary
SchoolSchool
Riverside County
Department of
Social Services
West
Riverside
Elementary
SchoolSchool
Eddie D.
Smith Senior
Center
Legend
Project Site
Existing Bike
Facilities
Major Crosswalks
Transit Stops
MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATIONMODAL TRANSPORTATIONMODAL TRANSPORTATIONMODAL TRANSPORTATION PAAT completes the
bicycle and pedestrian bicycle and pedestrian
facilities of Pacific/Sierra facilities of Pacific/Sierra Avenue, creating the most Avenue, creating the most
connective bicycle route connective bicycle route
in the surrounding area. in the surrounding area.
The project serves two The project serves two
Riverside Transportation Riverside Transportation
Routes along Limonite Routes along Limonite
Avenue (29) and Mission Avenue (29) and Mission Avenue (29) and Mission Boulevard (49). The
project additionally
services 3 major
crosswalks and two
nearby mountains with nearby mountains with
bicycle trails.
2-Mile
Radius
TIMS CRASH DATATIMS CRASH DATATIMS CRASH DATA
TIMS Crash Data shows that over 4.5% of accidents involved pedestrians, with 263 TIMS Crash Data shows that over 4.5% of accidents involved pedestrians, with 263 TIMS Crash Data shows that over 4.5% of accidents involved pedestrians, with 263 TIMS Crash Data shows that over 4.5% of accidents involved pedestrians, with 263 TIMS Crash Data shows that over 4.5% of accidents involved pedestrians, with 263 victims over the last 10 years. victims over the last 10 years. Data showed that six collisions occurred on Pacific Avenue Data showed that six collisions occurred on Pacific Avenue Data showed that six collisions occurred on Pacific Avenue Data showed that six collisions occurred on Pacific Avenue involving bicyclists.involving bicyclists.
SAFETY COLLISON HEAT MAPSAFETY COLLISON HEAT MAPSAFETY COLLISON HEAT MAPSAFETY COLLISON HEAT MAP 2-Mile
Radius
This TIMS
Collision Heat
Map shows the
distribution of
accidents over
the last 10 years
within the
project radius.
The majority of
accidents
involving
pedestrians
happen at
intersections,
resulting in 3
striped
crosswalks along
Pacific Avenue.
Pacific Ave.
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional PAAT includes installing sidewalks along the eastern side of the corridor and additional safety measures, such as new crosswalk striping at Vista de Oro.safety measures, such as new crosswalk striping at Vista de Oro.safety measures, such as new crosswalk striping at Vista de Oro.safety measures, such as new crosswalk striping at Vista de Oro.
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS Pacific Avenue will be widened to the west to accommodate the new sidewalk Pacific Avenue will be widened to the west to accommodate the new sidewalk Pacific Avenue will be widened to the west to accommodate the new sidewalk Pacific Avenue will be widened to the west to accommodate the new sidewalk Pacific Avenue will be widened to the west to accommodate the new sidewalk installments and painting installments and painting sharrows to create a bicycle route. The corridor will be to create a bicycle route. The corridor will be to create a bicycle route. The corridor will be repaved (non-TDA funding) by the city to create acceptable conditions for the bicycle TDA funding) by the city to create acceptable conditions for the bicycle TDA funding) by the city to create acceptable conditions for the bicycle TDA funding) by the city to create acceptable conditions for the bicycle TDA funding) by the city to create acceptable conditions for the bicycle route.
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, Pedestrians and bicyclists are forced to maneuver around parked cars on Pacific Avenue, pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating pushing them further into traffic where cars tend to travel at 42 miles per hour. Creating more awareness with the more awareness with the sharrow painting that bicyclists are welcomed on the street.painting that bicyclists are welcomed on the street.painting that bicyclists are welcomed on the street.painting that bicyclists are welcomed on the street.
"# $#"%& "#
%192<A$,9,3,<A(,@89"A&>2550968A*25?,"A(,@89A):8A+0;"A
$:2,7A$094<87"A%8>7.25A(06-09"A'0<520A#5=,629,78"A%8>7.25A(06-09"A#96,7/8A%,9687,"A%8>7.25A(06-0:A ?bdY]l36(l3034l
He,lEU``klAXQ`l
LYhUdeZTUlAag`fklNdQ`ebadfQfZa`lAa__YeeYa`l
5080lGU_a`lMfdUUf)l4#"$C]aadl
LYhUdeZTU*lA?l93601l
-(%C)@<@;0C/0772BC,015351C&A29@2C&1?5A2C.<09>;:<?0?5:9C",&&.#C,=:621?$C':885?829?C?:C*:107C+0?14C BUQdlHe,lAXQ`:l
?elQlbQdflaVlfXUlLYhUdeZTUlAag`fklNdQ`ebadfQfYa`lAa__ZeeYa`$el&LAOA'lOJ?l?dfZS]Ul4l&M@l832'l@YSkS^UlQ`Tl KUTUefdYQ`lCQSY]YfZUelWdQ`flQbb^ZSQfZa`lbdaSUee*lQl]aSQ]lVg`TZ`Wl_QfSXlSa__Yf_U`fl]UffUdlVadlfXUlbdabaeUTlMXQTail ?hU`gUlMYTUiQ]\lKda[USflZeldUcgZdUT-lOXYel^UffUdleUdhUelQelfXUlAYfklaVlFgdgbQlPQ]]Uk%elSa__Yf_U`flfal_UUflfXUl _QfSXY`WlVg`TldUcgZdU_U`felQelVa]]aie;l
IQ_UlaVlCg`TZ`WlMagdSU<lHUQegdUl?l
Cg`TY`WlNkbU<lMQ]UelOQjlHUQegdUlVadlKgR^ZSlD_bdahU_U`fel GaSQ]lHQfSX=l"708+880l&60#laVlfafQ]lbda[USflSaef'lYelQhQZ]QR]UlZ__UTZQfU]k.l K]UQeUlSa`fQSfl_UlQfldRgf]Ud>[gdgbQhQ]]Uk,adWlYVlkaglXQhUlQ`klcgUefYa`e/l LaTl@/l@gf]Udl
AZfklHQ`QWUdl
34/,W:DHJIDO@W6R@)$W9QL>W<>FF@U%W76W4.1,4&1-3/W
;CJI@5W"41-#W//.'2020$W86=W"41-#W//.(2441W
T*EPNPM?S?GGAV+KNBW
17336.00005\41471305.2
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT 2
(PROGRAM POLICIES)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE
AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM ADOPTED POLICIES
Transportation Development Act Policies
1. Up to 5% of Article 3 apportionment can be used to supplement other funding sources used for bicycle and safety education programs; the allocation cannot be used to fully fund the salary of a person working on these programs.
2. Article 3 money shall be allocated for the construction, including related engineering expenses, of the facilities, or for bicycle safety education programs.
3. Money may be allocated for the maintenance of bicycling trails, which are closed to motorized traffic.
4. Facilities provided for the use of bicycles may include projects that serve the needs of commuting bicyclists, including, but not limited to, new trails serving major transportation corridors, secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, and transit terminals where other funds are available.
5. Within 30 days after receiving a request for a review from any city or county, the transportation-planning agency shall review its allocations.
6. Up to 20 percent of the amount available each year to a city or county may be allocated to restripe Class II bicycle lanes.
7. A portion of each city’s allocation may also be used to develop comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans. Plans must emphasize bike/pedestrian facilities that support utilitarian bike/pedestrian travel rather than solely recreational activities; a maximum of one entire allocation per five years may be used for plan development.
8. Allowable maintenance activities for the local funds are limited to maintenance and repairs of Class I off-street bicycle facilities only.
RCTC Policies
1. The SB 821 Call for Projects will occur on a biennial basis, with a release date of the first Monday of every other February and a close date of the last Thursday of every other April, beginning in 2015.
2. If a project cannot be fully funded, RCTC may recommend partial funding for award. To handle tiebreakers, RCTC will use, in terms of priority, the safety question first then construction readiness.
3. Agencies awarded funds will not be reimbursed for any project cost overruns.
4. Agencies being awarded an allocation will be reimbursed in arrears only upon submitting adequate proof of satisfactory project completion. Claims need to 17336.00005\41471305.2
Attachment 2
include: the claim form, copies of paid invoices, a copy of the Notice of Completion (NOC), and photographs of the completed project.
5. The allocated amount represents the maximum amount eligible for reimbursement.
For projects completed under the allocated amount, the agency will be reimbursed at the matching ratio as presented in the application.
6. An agency will have thirty-six (36) months from the time of the allocation to complete the project. There will be no time extensions granted unless the reason for the delay can be demonstrated. Where substantial progress or a compelling reason for delay can be shown, the agency may be granted administrative extensions in twelve-month increments at the discretion of the Executive Director.
7. Any programmed and unused Article 3 Program funds will be forfeited unless that agency can a) utilize the unused funds to complete projects that are the same or similar in scope and/or are contiguous to the approved project or b) apply the funds to a project previously submitted under an Article 3 call for projects and approved by the Commission, subject to Executive Director approval.
8. Design and construction of facilities must conform to the general design criteria for non-motorized facilities as outlined in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.
9. Temporary facilities, projects in the bid process, or projects that are under construction will not be funded.
10. The SB 821 evaluation committee will be comprised of a minimum of five evaluators representing a wide range of interests; such as: accessibility, bicycling, Coachella Valley, public transit, and the region. Staff, consultants, and other representatives from agencies submitting project proposals will not be eligible to participate on the evaluation committee that year.
11. Following each call, staff will monitor the equity of allocations to Coachella Valley versus Western Riverside County; the allocation should be relative to what the Coachella Valley’s share would have been if distributed on a per capita basis (the percentage of funds applied for should also be taken into consideration). If the allocation is often found to be inequitable to the Coachella Valley, staff will recommend adoption of a new policy to correct the imbalance.
12. Certain costs at times associated with bicycle/pedestrian projects are not eligible when the benefit provided is not the exclusive use of bicyclists/pedestrians, such as: curb and gutter as part of roadway drainage system, driveway ramps installed across sidewalks, and where roadway design standards require a roadway shoulder width that is at least as wide as a standard bike lane.
13. For each Call for Projects, a city is eligible to submit up to three (3) applications, and the County of Riverside is eligible to submit up to two (2) applications per Supervisorial District.
14. Each application is limited to a maximum request of 10% of the current Call for Projects programming capacity.
15. Total award to one jurisdiction is limited to 20% of current Call for Project’s programming capacity.
16. Awarded agencies can commence reimbursable project activities on July 1 of the Call 17336.00005\41471305.2
Attachment 2
for Project fiscal year cycle. E.g.: for FY 23/24 Call for Projects, reimbursable work starts on July 1, 2023.
17. Awarded agencies have until October 1 of the Call for Project fiscal year cycle to execute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with RCTC. E.g.: for FY 23/24 Call for Projects, MOUs must be executed by October 1, 2023 Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.F
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VAL LEY
AND KOA CORPORATION FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S
SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, CIP #19107
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City Council approve the First Amendment for Construction Management Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and KOA Corporation for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure, CIP #19107 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND
On January 9, 2023, staff published a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure project for Construction management services on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web based procurement and bidding system. The scope of work includes for construction management and inspection services for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure project. The solicitati on closed on January 26, 2023. Per the guidelines set forth in the RFP and KOA Corporation was ranked as the most qualified firm to provide the services.
On March 16, 2023 , the City Council approved an agreement with KOA to perform construction management s ervices for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap C losure, capital improvement program (“CIP”) project #19107. The agreement contained a not to exceed amount of $196,384 and accounted for 60 working days.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
KOA Corporation has been managing the project since t he initial start of construction.
Due to unforeseen field conditions involving water service lines and fire hydrant relocation, the construction contractor has had to work overtime to keep the project on schedule. The circumstances have resulted in KOA Cor poration incurring additional inspection costs. The project is still currently under construction and has an anticipated completion date of early October 2023.
On August 28, 2023, KOA Corporation provided a proposal to the City to continue providing construction support services. The proposed First Amendment accounts for up to four additional weeks of construction support se rvices for an additiona l $63,708 .
Approving the First Amendment will allow KOA Corporation to complete project inspections and continue to respond to contractor requests for information. If approved, the First Amendment will increase the overall not-to-exceed amount to $260,092.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The First Amendment will increase the not-to-exceed amount to $260,092. The Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure is funded by the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4 and Measure “A” funds as part of CIP project no. 19107.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve Amendment No.1
2. Provide alternate direction to Staff
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY AND KOA CORPORATION FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S
SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, CIP #19107
This First Amendment is made and effective as of September 7, 2023, between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (“City”) and KOA Corporation, a California Corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This First Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On March 16, 2023, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KOA CORPORATION FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, STATE PROJECT NO 5487(003).”
2. Section 4.A of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. PAYMENT
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payments as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Sixty Thousand and Ninety-two dollars ($260,092) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
5. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
-1-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and executed personally or on its behalf by its duly authorized representative.
KOA CORPORATION
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
A California Municipal Corporation
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
-2-
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Consultant shall perform construction management services for an amount not to exceed $260,092 during the term of the Agreement. Consultant’s original cost proposal and request for additional funds dated August 28, 2023, is attached.
-3-
Assumptinns
aD Wor!<ing Days
ull Ume Prav3Jling 1-'Vage Co -t:ruction lnsp ,icn P.:n tim:= CM
Subs: RT2A {Labor Compliance), <3-3 (l.!aterial Testing) Subconsullanl feeslnclude 10% AdministrativeOverhead
TASl<S
Construclion Managemen1and lnspe<>tlon
Tuk 1Proiecl Mananemen!(Coordination
L l Communication
t2 Meetings
!, 3 Scl,e<lule and Budget
1.4 Misc Uanoous
SUBTOTAL TASK 1
Task 2 Construction ob·servatii,n
2.1 Comn,,.uni.:a•Jon
2.2 Mee-n·ngs_ilre.pection
2.3 Sch&dule and Budget
2.4 Construction
2.-5 A-dminfstrJtive-
SUBTOTAL TASK 2
Task 3 M,iterials lnsnectionnd Testmr1
3.1 Pr,;-ConS'.ruction Coordination
3.2 Consm,.::tion OA? Mat rial Testing
3.3 Post-Connruc:ion R-eport .md
C9:rtifioatic.n SUBTOTAL TASK 3
Task 4 Uibor Comnrwice
4.1 LaborCompliance lr.Wrvfaws
4.2 Certi:';Contractor ?ayrollRecore!;
4.'3 Llbor Complianc=:Carrespcnd-arr.eand Corr&C'l:t:)ns,
4.4 LJbor Compliance Discrcpancie -i.t\/JolJ:iorE Mgn,t
4.5 Mon:hty Labor Compliance Report
SUBTOTAL TASK4
T: k 5 l'o.sfConslruc6_oriServices
5.1 Evaluat: Ccmole1ion of Work
5.2 Final lnSIH!Olion.Walkwough
5.3 Fl.mchlisG.ind Completion of l;ems
5.4 Guarante.:s/Warranti sDocument.1tion
5.5 Assess Final Paym-ent a.nd R1:f-e.1Se of R te-ntion
5.6 Cahrans lnvoio-?Assista :e (Atlcwa,,oe)
5.7 Project rt!'! DSiveries
SUBTOTAL TASKS
SUBTO.,-Al,KOA
RTEA.Labor CcmpH nce / Office Engine,,Jing
Office "nglne-er/ Labor Compliance (Allowance)
Subtobl
PROPOSAL FEE
Construction Mana.g:m r,t and Inspection S2rvices-
City of Jurupa Valley
SUNNYSLO?E ARE', SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT No. E487(0D3); Cl? IQ107
Prcject AsstRE/ Construction Admin Ma!.e-rial TE.Sting Labo.- M.!.nag r: E.:Sr ConsTUction lnep<eclor G3 CompliJnc TOTAL COST CM Manager Offioa
S200.00 $184.00 S147.03 S103.D0
-l -ID $:i.160.00
2-l S5,21o.00
-l 24 55.216.00
lo 112 $23.808.00
28 200 0 0 $42,400.00
24 S3,528.00
1? $1.784.00
2 S1.764.00
380 S55,860.00
15 S2. 52.00
0 0 444 0 $65,268.00
2 S36S.00
2 4 S95o.00
1 4 S936.00
1 8 4 0 $2,260.00
S0.00
2 S368.00
2 5358.00
S0.00
4 S736.00
0 8 0 0 $1,472.00
2 8 1o $4.:l.24.00
16 8 54.120.00
2 8 16 $4.:l.24.00
2 S358.00
1 4 S936.00
a 14 8 $7,19?.0Q
4 16 24 l6 S9.Q20.00
17 78 72 16 $29.SU.00
48 2Q4 520 11! $141,384.00
I S27.500.00 S27.500.00
G3• Material Te5ling .1nd OAP lmpl menb!lon
Ma:erials Testing. ConstructionTesting & QA=>(Allowance) Subtct..11
ODC
ALL ?HASES TOTAL HO'JRS
I
46 I 2a4 I 520 !
S27.500.00
I
527,500.00'
$0.00
ALLPHASES TOTAL COST SQ,200 $E4.DQ8 S75,44 SI ,e.l9 S27,500 S27,500 $196,384.00
FEE PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE CITY OF JURDPA VALLEY 4
ADD-ON PROPOSAL FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 5487(003)
CITY PROJECT NO. 19107
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
August 28, 2023
FEE PROPOSAL
Assumptions
Up to 20 Add-On Working Days
Full time Prevailing Wage Construction Inspection Part time CM Subs: RTEA (Labor Compliance), G-3 (Material Testing)
ADD-ON PROPOSAL FEE
Construction Management and Inspection Services
City of Jurupa Valley
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT No. 5487(003); CIP 19107
TASKS
Project
Manager/RE/Sr CM
Asst.RE/
Construction
Manager
Construction
Inspector
Admin Material Testing
G3
Labor Compliance
Office Engineering
RTEA
TOTAL COST
$200.00 $184.00 $147.00 $103.00
Construction Management and Inspection
Task 1 Project Management / Coordination
1.1 Communication $0.00
1.2 Meetings $0.00
1.3 Schedule and Budget $0.00
1.4 Miscellaneous $0.00
SUBTOTAL TASK 1 0 0 0 0 $0.00
Task 2 Construction Observation
2.1 Communication $0.00
2.2 Meetings/Inspection 160 $23,520.00
2.3 Schedule and Budget $0.00
2.4 Construction 12 120 $24,480.00
2.5 Administrative 12 $1,236.00
SUBTOTAL TASK 2 12 120 160 12 $49,236.00
Task 3 Materials Inspection and Testing
3.1 Pre-Construction Coordination $0.00
3.2 Construction QAP Material Testing $0.00
3.3 Post-Construction Report and Certification $0.00 SUBTOTAL TASK 3 0 0 0 0 $0.00
Task 4 Labor Compliance
4.1 Labor Compliance Interviews $0.00
4.2 Certify Contractor Payroll Records $0.00
4.3 Labor Compliance Correspondence and Corrections Docts $0.00
4.4 Labor Compliance Discrepancies/Violations Mgmt $0.00
4.5 Monthly Labor Compliance Report $0.00
SUBTOTAL TASK 4 0 0 0 0 $0.00
Task 5 Post Construction Services
5.1 Evaluate Completion of Work 2 4 $1,136.00
5.2 Final Inspection/Walkthrough 4 4 $1,324.00
5.3 Punchlists and Completion of Items 2 4 $956.00
5.4 Guarantees/Warranties Documentation 1 $184.00
5.5 Assess Final Payment and Release of Retention 2 $368.00
5.6 Caltrans Invoice Assistance (Allowance) 2 4 $1,136.00
5.7 Project File Deliveries 2 4 4 $1,368.00
SUBTOTAL TASK 5 4 19 12 4 $6,472.00
SUBTOTAL KOA 16 139 172 16 $55,708.00
RTEA - Labor Compliance / Office Engineering
Office Engineer/ Labor Compliance (Allowance) $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Subtotal $4,000.00
G3 - Material Testing and QAP Implementation
Materials Testing, Construction Testing & QAP (Allowance) $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Subtotal $4,000.00
ODC $0.00
ALL PHASES TOTAL HOURS 16 139 172 16
ALL PHASES TOTAL COST $3,200 $25,576 $25,284 $1,648 $4,000 $4,000 $63,708.00
ADD-ON PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY 4
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.G
ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION AND SIDEWALK
EASEMENT SOUTHWEST OF THE LIMONITE AVENUE AND COREY
STREET INTERSECTION (FIRE MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LLC, APNS:
163-021-033, 163-021-037, & 163-021-038)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, adjacent to existing Limonite Avenue public right -of-way as described in DED22-008.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication DED22-008.
3. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, adjacent to existing Corey Street public right-of-way as described in DED22-009.
4. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Cl erk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-009.
5. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for sidewalk purposes, alongside Corey Street as described in sidewalk easement DED23-001.
6. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign t he Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-001.
BACKGROUND
On May 23, 2022, the Community Development Director approved Master Application (MA) No. 21294 for Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 21105 to permit the construction of a 7,381 square -foot commercial retail building (AutoZone) on 1.37 acres located southwest of the Limonite Avenue and Corey Street intersection. The owner is required to dedicate right -of-way along Limonite Avenue and Corey Street in order to fulfill the
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
improvements set forth within th e conditions of approval. The public road and utility easements and sidewalk easement will accommodate the designated ultimate right -of- way for those streets by the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan.
The applicant submitted the required offer of dedicat ion documents; staff reviewed the documents, and found them in compliance with the California Government Code (7050), local ordinances, and the conditional of approval for this development.
ANALYSIS
In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedication, staff prepared Certificates of Acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of dedication will grant the City an easement for public road and drainage purposes and for sidewalk purposes.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The applicant is required to complete the formation and annexation process into the City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89 -1-C for the maintenance of improvements within the public right-of-way as a part of the project’s Conditions of Approval. The property owner s are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment. The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89 -1-C and will be used to pay for the maintenance of parkway landscape, streetlights, and catch basins.
Both the revenue and expenses will be part of the City’s FY 2024-2025 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the General Fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide alternative direction to City staff.
****************************SIGNATURES ON FOLOWING PAGE****************************
R. 6 SEC. 26 ROAD NAME: LI ONITE PROJECT# DED22-008 RETURN TO:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
1804 LIMONITE AVE
JURU PA V ALLEY, CA. 92509
CERTIFICATE of ACCEPTANCE SEE ATTACHED
(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281 )
163-021-033, 163-021-037,
163-021-038
DTT: 0
THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF JURuPA VALLEY AND ENTITLED TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. (GOV. CODE 6103)
OFFER OF DEDICATION
Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pratuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants (OWNERS)
Grant(s) to the City or Jurupa Valley, a political subdivision, an easement for public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public services purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLAT ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" AND MADE A PART HEREOF
SIGNATURE OF RECORDED OWNER(S) MUST BE NOTARIZED See attached BY:
PRINT NAME: J!mm7 VeiaYases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: JOint Owner
BY:
PRINT NAME: Pratuang Vetayases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: JOint Owner
S ee n(ikr; 7 eA o, 'r kch rn-, }-
4iitil t>Page O of 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing tliis certificate verities only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attaclied, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On June 14, 2023 before me, Mizdalia Miranda, Notary Public Personally appeared Pratuang Vetayases & Jimmy Vetayases Who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
r"':,7:- ' MIGDALIAMIRalDA' "4%
- ,41 NOtary PubliC California ,
Th i'2$;} Los Angeles County q
Z s-<.'.-J- i . .
. . * vi-s -ry Commission # 2427645 v
WITNESS mJ Hand and OfflClal seal 4 -Sr28. My Comm. Expires Nov 21, 2026 %) JCt'__ "=a.lo'j-r'X'laffi-'YIJWl'%
Siqnature W (Seali
" /
EXHIBIT "A"
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT
DED 22-008
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN BLOCK A OF MAP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11, PAGE 63 0F MAPS, OF SAID COUNTY RECORDS, IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, SOUTH 00o29'00" WEST, 14.00 FEETTO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PER DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 13, 1968 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 44145 RECORD OF SAID COUNTY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89o29'35" EAST, 154.98 FEETTO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, 47.12 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89o59"52" TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 3 0F SAID INSTRUMENT N0. 44145;
THENCE NORTH 89o29"43" WEST, 2.93 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LAYING PARALLEL TO AND 28.00 FEET
WESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF COREY STREET AS PER SAID MAP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY- THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 00o30"l7" EAST, 3.74 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 65ol5'07" WEST, 27.43 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LAYING PARALLEL TO AND 59.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF LIMONITE AVENUE AS PER SAID MAP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 89o29"35" WEST, 222.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LIN E OF THE WESTERLY 124.50 FEET OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH Oo27'43" EAST,
15.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY LINE ON INSTRUMENT N0. 44145; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LIN E, SOUTH 89o29'35" EAST, 65.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 3,747 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
SUBJECTTO ALL MATTERS OF RECORD IF ANY.
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION ON MARCH 20, 2023.
JEFFREY J. LENHERR DATE
P.L.S. 9305
(; LLI :X) (i
N0. 9305
Page I of 1
SHEET ) OF )
EXHIBIT "B"
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILlrY EASEMENT: DED 22-008
- - - - -
DEDICATED PER M.B. DEDICATED i
Il /63 AS LOT A LIMONITE AVENUE , -C! PER M.B. I
o.c. ,,:O -o 11/ AS I
%PCOR.LOT5 oo "a
63 7\
, LOT 6/
rlSQea
____ ,,; Q
X" I II l'o l
I ,.- , L6 -.,/:- p,l,, S89'29 35 E 154.98 I -7-, _ oco-icq
PER M.B. i
63 AS I11/ 7\
LOT 6/ *E-I
rlSQ
i l,/
ILLI
I=n -
I-t O
l?'- C!
C%IC%I
5(O
o
[,
'8/
V / / " l " '
7)' p.O.a. /y
///// u Van, i. : .ff k, I%,
1 W'LY LINE LOT 5"S,
-O
o,- Lo-r -//
+
124.5'
/
/
BLCK;K
xsg'zg'.ys"w 222.50' @ -% ma;,l,,5 14 / 8.0' i .
to-r 6 t>-; :"""'=hiQri
g:Oi
3 0 51
> [ ) 01
_,4
LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA TANGENT
Ll 14.00 SOO'29'00"W C1 30.00' 47.12' ag'bg'sz" 30.00'
L2 2.93 N89'29'43"W
EfAcoPOuuRnTIOoN,O;vL=A;siDo=DEEDED TO
RECORDED MAY 13, l968 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 4414SOF NORTHOFFICIAL RECORDS.
rl A ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT
L_I GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF
SCALE: I " = 40'
RIVERSIDEFORROADANDUTILITY roA,ul, c,A,, ,,, ,,,T
L3 3.74 NOO'30'1 7"E
L4 27.43 N65'1 5'07"W
L5 15.00 NO(T27'43"E
L6 65.47 S89'29'35"E
PURPOSESRECORDEDMARCH """"" a"""- ""-"' 80
20, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. o zo "o
? 3@@B_(B35555,
%%XJ'
tics,io
TVKTlklr_ I rlT I IhlC
S ( a a < L i lli.)l If N '-J L ' I LI I N L
. No' .!3o5 *o - % - srpisrcemepuue-R/W - RIGHT OF WAY LINE "> %" - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE
a"o' a""""" P.O.B. POINTOFBEGINNING
o"'o" P.O.C. POINTOFCOMMENCEMENT
Kimley>>Horn
1100 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
PHONE: 714-939-1031
WWW.XIMLEY-HORN.COM
9' K(AoREHAT OBEFINWGAYDEDDEIDC'ACTAETDlo) NAn,EAa 3747 SQ. FT.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt: Government Code Section 6103
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APN: 163-021-033, 163-021-037, 163-021-038
STREET NAME: Limonite Avenue
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT (DED 22-008)
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property granted by the easement deed dated June 14, 2023, from the Grantor, Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pra tuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants , to the Grantee, C ITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a municipal corporation , is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Jurupa Valley on behalf of the public for public road, drainage, and utility purposes and is hereby accepted into the City Maintained Road Sys tem pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned as provided in Streets and Highways Code section 1806 and Sections 1 and 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 669.1, as said ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley purs uant to Jurupa Valley Ordinance No. 11 -10 adding chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, adopting by reference the ordinances of the County of Riverside as of July 1, 2011 , the date of incorporation of the City of Jurupa Valley, as well as the resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside implementing these ordinance s. Grantee consents to the recordation of said easement by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: September 7, 2023
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ATTEST:
Paul Toor, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
R. 6 SEC. 26 ROAD NAME: C REY PROJECT # DED22-009
RETURN TO:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
1804 LIMONITE AVE
JURUPA VALLEY, CA. 92509
CERTIFICATE of ACCEPTANCE SEE ATTACHED
(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281)
163-021-033, 163-021-037,
163-021-038
DTT: 0
THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND ENTITLED TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. (GOV. CO[)E 6103)
OFFER OF DEDICATION
Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pratuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants (OWNERS)
Grant(s) to the City or Jurupa Valley, a political subdivision, an easement For public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public services purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLAT ATT ACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" AND MADE A PART HEREOF
SIGNATURE OF RECORDED OWNER(S) MUST BE NOTARIZED See attached BY:
PRINT NAME: J!mm7 VeiaYases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: JOint Owner
BY:
PRINT NAME: Pratuang Vetayases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: Joint Owner
Page O of 1
5ze nOkr'CeJ clS-lv(§vmnh
UD12Q-l3 9
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing tliis certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attaclied, and not tlie truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of tliat document.
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On June 44, 2023 before me, Mi5:zdalia Miranda, Notary Public Personally appeared Pratuang Vetayases & Jimmy Vetayases Who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
m,,,..,;m
41.(, _ - ;4 No"""Pu"'c Ca"fO"a x
WITNESSmYhandandOfflCalalSeal "a."'"""' Co"mosm"'%ss""ieot:s#c2o4u2n7c6y45 ! t .a<E"_Sz' My Comm. Exptres Nov 2i 2026 (
fy}ia ._-._&-<fl_%a'-_lliaaffW"IN
Qiyria'i+iirz M /Qe'iyll
Q I u I I CI L u I C. ' - l() ff d 11
" /
EXHIBIT "A"
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT
DED 22-009
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK A OF MAP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11, PAGE 63 0F MAPS, OF SAID COUNTY RECORDS, IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M.
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING ATTHE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, NORTH 00o30'l7" EAST, 90.00 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 90.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89o31'57" WEST, 5.00
FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PER DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 13, 1968 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 44145 0F SAID COUNTY RECORDS BEING ALSO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89o31'57" WEST, 2.93 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 28.00 FEET WESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF COREY STREET PER SAID M AP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 00o30"l7" EAST, 180.01 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 89o29'43" EAST, 2.93 FEET TO A POINT ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00o30'l7" WEST, 180.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 527 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
SUBJECT TO ALL MATTERS OF RECORD, IF ANY.
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION ON MARCH 20, 2023, r('> M 03/20/2023
JEFFREY J. LENHERR DATE
P.L.S. 9305
N0. 9305
Page I of 1
SHEET ) OF )
EXHIBIT "B"
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTlLlrY EASEMENT: DED 22-009
% . ' DEDICATED
DEDICATED PER M.B.-/ o. _ PER M-B-
Il /(33 AS LOT A XLIMONITE AVENUE on q. u /63 AS',_ LOT T6X-I
211
EIGR'AoN"T'EoD"TgC'(:'U"NoTY OF
RIVERSIDE RECORDED MAY
13, ) 968 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
44145 0F OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
r'
>)lA'? o'
8 l., (, c_,) i(( f l
NORTH
SCALE: ) " = 40'
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
LINE TABLE ' EQ l;
a a x 18
' O z
- () 0 i
, !') z,
o
0 i(/;)
E'LY LINE
LOT 5
93'
")R (]'
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 5.00 N89'31 '57"W
L2 2.93 N89'31 '57"W
L3 2.93 S89'29'43"E
L4 90.00 N(T30'17"E
'-"'
/ S89'31'57"E 184.90' %
L/' 182.00' vO-B-
r I
u't'r LINE OF THEj L2'1_ aa ' X4 1
/"% S'LY90.00'LOT5 P.O.C.
M
4,..LXJ'LEGEND
SE COR. LOT 5 -;
r l/I @Tl h I /% I ti 'r i i x i r_
,.(a --5-rri LAl31ll'l'L'-)lLll'lr-
k ('
':x' - %_ - srpeerceurepuue
xo. 9305 . -R/W - RIGHTOFWAYLINE
- - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE
'r4' or CAt'03/22/2023@*' fl.o.a. POINTOF BEGINNING
o rs r' grllhlT rig rrikAkAghlrgkM-MT
Kimley>>Horn
1100 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
PHONE: 714-939-1031
WW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
f, , l,, I (/ II N I l_/ I (- (/ I V II V I L_ I N (- L I V I I_ I N I 8h:(AR_;REHAT OBEFINWGAYDEDDE,DCIACTAETDIO, N
AHEA= 527 SQ. FT.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt: Government Code Section 6103
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APN: 163-021-033, 163-021-037, 163-021-038
STREET NAME: Corey Street
PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT (DED 22-009)
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property granted by the easement deed dated June 14, 2023 from the Grantor, Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pra tuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants , to the Grantee, C ITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a municipal corporation , is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Jurupa Valley on behalf of the public for public road, drainage, and utility purposes and is hereby accepted into the City Maintained Road Sys tem pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned as provided in Streets and Highways Code section 1806 and Sections 1 and 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 669.1, as said ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley purs uant to Jurupa Valley Ordinance No. 11 -10 adding chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, adopting by reference the ordinances of the County of Riverside as of July 1, 2011 , the date of incorporation of the City of Jurupa Valley, as well as the resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside implementing these ordinance s. Grantee consents to the recordation of said easement by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: September 7, 2023
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ATTEST:
Paul Toor, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
RETtlRN TO:
CITt' OF JURUPA VALLEY
8930 LIMONITE AVE
JURUPA V ALLEY CA. 92509
CERTI FICATE of ACCEPTANCE SEE ATTACHED
(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281)
APN
163-021-033, 163-021-037,
163-021-038
THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR
THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY AN[)
ENTITLED TO BE RECORDED
WITHOLIT FEE. (GOV. CODE
6103)
DTT.O THISINSTRUMENTISFORTHEBENEFITOFTHECITYOFJURUPAVALLEYANDENTITLEDTOBERECORDEDWITHOUTFEE.(GOV.CODE6103) SIDEWALK EASEMENT DED 23 001
Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pratuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants Grant(s) to the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a municipal corporation, this easement is for sidewalk purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLAT ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" AND MADE A PART HEREOF
SIGNATURE OF RECORDED OWNER(S) MUST BE NOTARIZED See attached PRINT NAME: Jimmy Vetayases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: JOint Owner
BY: M,-
PRINT NAME: Pratuang Vetayases
PRINT TITLE/COMPANY: JOint Owner
S ee i/l@ha('at tea cx"r WJlsaevll'
6/Nil-3 8
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed tlie document to wliich tliis certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On iune u, 2023 before me, MiHdalia Miranda, Notary Public Personally appeared Pratuang Vetayases & Jimmy Vetayases Who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws oT the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
!"".,a - .-,j{ ,,, - ---Wq
! /'Q:k MIGDALIAMIRANDA b
;z {g4,. '} Notary Publi< California %
WITNESS my hand and official seal " ";' Co"mos:isnffieo;;c2o4u2n';:45 U" [_ ,ffi':" My Comm. Expires Nov 2i 2026 [)a"-).4 %.a"T!=imm-==--.______ _- - - - #- -+-ffll91lq Siqnature u (Seal>
"' /
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SIDEWALK EASEMENT
DED23-001
THAT PORTION OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK A OF MAP OF SPARRLAND POULTRY COLONY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11, PAGE 63 0F MAPS, OF SAID COUNTY RECORDS, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 90.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 90.00 FEET, NORTH 89"31'57" WEST, 7.93 FEET TO A POINT LYING PARALLEL TO AND 8.00 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 00o30'l7" EAST, 32.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, NORTH 00o30'l7" EAST, 43.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 9.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIALTO WHICH BEARS SOUTH 33"18'll" EAST;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 4.37 FEETTHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27"49'39" TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LYING PARALLEL TO AND 12.00 FEET WESTERLY OF SAID EASTERLY LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 00o30'l7" WEST, 42.02 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 89"29'43" EAST, 1.28 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 9.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL TO WHICH BEARS NORTH 00o30'l5" EAST;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2.84 FEETTHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18"03'51" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 174 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BYTHIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
SUBJECT TO ALL M ATTERS OF RECORD, IF ANY.
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. r ! ko6/08/2023
JEFFREY J. LENHERR
P.L.S. 9305
DATE
69 G
N0. 9305
Page I of 1
EYYIQIT "P" "a ' o"
@-ffl/1 € @@&i@ @
_ , _ SIDEWALK EASEMENT: DED 23-001
LIMONITE AVENUI
H
25.07' - i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
12J i 0 5 10 20
t I
> i ._ I
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 7.93 N89'31 '57"W
L2 32.56 NOO'30'1 7"E
L3 1.28 S89'29'43"E
"_ Tl'o I
:= Ah)i @ '0 C. ', I
z (R)2, a zl -0 s, / -l>
bi x , 72' ffi_: NORTH, Q - I y
k Lt. ' hl'h'l l
IE-I(' s' " ' Q
'' C) 'S % r %
z S S - , ,5 A I
,T:'!: - 00) 2
4 pS E-I
-' e & Z - 0 " C/)o
": " all ' a zOff
C) 'S ,,ox I I rii >
RADIAL LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING
(R)1 S33'1 8'l 1"E
(R)2 NO5'28'32"W
(R)3 NO(T30'15"E
(R)4 s* a"ho'oe>"vv
_ ; (L " Ul@"A I e5 'r_* I
i Cl' o I I
o':i u> l ) R)4 E I, cr> I 0
C) 1_'3,7 as, > P.O.B. ()
"- (R)3-/ I'(
2 W'LY LINE OF
INST. N0. 44u5
li I
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA
Cl 9.00' 4.37' 27'49'39"
C2 9.00' 2.84' 18"03'51"
I '
N'LY LINE OF THE I Fl.o.c.
S'LY 90' LOT 5 li I,i NE COR OF
al -' THE S'LY 90' -R/W- RIGHT OF WAY LINE. ,/
LP LOT 5
1 - %_ - cemepuye
'%
x I - - outortrui
C%J
20' - - - - - - - TIE LINE
0 P.O.B POINTOFBEGINNING
O-
+S'LY LINE LOT 5 S AREA= 174 SQ. FT.
P.O.C POINTOFCOMMENCEMENT
/ LIMITS OF SIDEWALK EASEMENT
EXISTINGEASEMENT: ,,,
xppopriouortwr:iapwrer:>rocouurror- # L'i
" RlVERSlDE IN DEED RECORDED MAY )3, )968 AS 7@' f(,,lNSTRUMENTN0. 44145 0F OFFICIAL RECORDS l/O-<11 /I I x p i z
Kimley>>Horn
1100 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
PHONE: 714-939-1031
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
(
EXCEPTION RECORDED
$APRIL 79, 7966 PER
74r a!INSTRUMENT 409 )9 t OF @>tS"""
06/07 /2023
O
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt: Government Code Section 6103
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APNs: 163-021-033, 163-021-037, 163-021-038
SIDEWALK EASEMENT (DED 23-001)
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property granted by the sidewalk easement deed dated June 14, 2023 from the Grantor, Jimmy Vetayases, a single man and Pra tuang Vetayases, an unmarried woman, as Joint Tenants , to the Grantee, C ITY OF JURUPA VA LLEY, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Jurupa Valley on behalf of the public for sidewalk purposes, shall not become part of the City until accepted by resolution of this council adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned as provided in Streets and Highways Code Section 1806 and Section 1 and 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 669.1, as said ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, ad opting by reference the ordinance of the County of Riverside of July 1, 2011, the date of incorporation of the City of Jurupa Va lley as well as the resolutions, rules and regulations of the C ounty of Riverside implementing these ordinances. Grantee consent s to the recordation of said easement by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: September 7, 2023
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ATTEST:
Paul Toor, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
MA21269 (GPA21010, SP21001, DA21001, & TTM38318) ; PROJECT:
CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING
FINDINGS, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR “THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA
VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN” THAT WOULD PERMIT DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1,192 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3 MILLION
SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES
(INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION USES); A HOTEL
WITH UP TO 160 ROOMS; AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ON AN APPROXIMATELY 248.3-ACRE
PROJECT SITE GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR-60 TO THE NORTH, THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVA RD TO THE WEST ; ( APPLICANT: EM
RANCH OWNER, LLC)
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-77, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM FOR THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY PROJE CT TO
ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1,192 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES (INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
LOGISTIC USES); A HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE AND HOSPITALITY AREA; AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ON AN APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT SITE GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY SR -60 TO THE NORTH, THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO
THE WEST
b. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-78, entitled:
A RESOLUTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21010,
SPECIFIC PLAN (SP21001), AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38318 TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1,192 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3 MILLION SQUARE FEE T OF COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES (INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND
LOGISTIC USES); A HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE AND HOSPITALITY AREA; AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ON AN APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT SITE GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY SR -60 TO THE NORTH, THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO
THE WEST (THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY)
c. Introduce and conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 2023-14, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 21010
BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND EM RANCH OWNER, LLC,
FOR THE DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY PROJECT ON AN
APPROXIMATELY 248.3 -ACRE PROJECT SITE GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR-60 TO THE NORTH, THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH
STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD TO THE WEST
PROPOSAL
The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan would replace the Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan (SP-337) that was adopted by Riverside County in 2005, before the City ’s incorporation that is currently applied to the project site. The Project site is approximately 248.3-acres in area located at the eastern portion of the City adjacent to the Santa Ana River and State Route (SR) 60. Figure 1, Vicinity Map, depicts the location of proposed Specific Plan and Figure 2 depicts the boundary of the proposed Specific Plan.
Proposed Specific Plan: The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan proposes the creation of multiple land use areas on the Project site that provides new residential development, regional and local commercial shopping centers, a hotel, business park, and warehouse/logistics uses. The Specific Plan also designates areas for public parks, trail linkages and other open space areas that connect the land use areas within the Specific Plan.
Page | 3
The proposed Specific Plan Land Use Plan (Figure 3) includes the following major land use components on the 248.3 acres:
Up to 1,192 new dwelling units (du) on 42.0 acres
1,472,500 sq uare feet of local neighborhood and regional commercial building square footage on 97.7 acres, including 112,500 square feet of hospitality building square footage (up to 160 hotel rooms) on 5.9 acres
1,500,000 square feet of Industrial/Logistics building square footage on 67.3 acres 30,000 square feet of Business Park building square footage on 7.8 acres 11.1 acres of public park and open space
22.4 acres of public improvements (public streets and parkways; and public facilities)
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Page | 4
Figure 2: Specific Plan Boundary
Figure 3: The District at Jurupa Valley Land Use Plan
Page | 5
Required Entitlements: The proposed Project includes the following entitlement applications:
General Plan Amendment (GPA 21010):
Change the underlying General Plan land use designations of Commercial Retail, Very High Density Residential, High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Medium High Density Residential associated with the Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan to Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Retail, Commercial Tourist, Light Industrial, High est Density Residential, Public Facilities, and Open Space -Recreation consistent with the proposed The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan land use designations. The Specific Plan Overlay remains on the project site;
Establish the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay on the
67.3 acre Industrial/Logistics (I-L) Land Use Area of the proposed Specific Plan; Create a new General Plan Overlay, the "Commercial Retail-Integrated Use” Overlay, and establish the Commercial Retail -Integrated Use Overlay on a
52.4-acre portion of the Commercial Retail Land Use Area of the proposed Specific Plan.
Specific Plan (SP 21001): Adopt The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan and repeal the Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan (SP-337) on the project site. Tentative Tract Map (TTM): Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38318) would subdivide the project site into 38 parcels to accommodate proposed land uses, preliminary grading and utilities plan, street vacations, and backbone improvements associated with the proposed Specific Plan.
Development Agreement (DA): An agreement between the applicant and the City that establishes a mechanism for the construction of infrastructure and other public improvements and sets the required community benefits the applicant will provide that help offset impacts from the proposed project.
BACKGROUND OF PROJECT SITE
Existing Specific Plan : The Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan (SP -337) that was adopted by Riverside County in 2005, before the City ’s incorporation, covers 278 acres including the District of Jurupa Valley ’s project site which is 248.3 acres . The Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan is bounded by Rubidoux Boulevard to the west, SR-60 to the north, Santa Ana River to the east, and 34th Street to the south. If the District of Jurupa Valley Specific Plan is approved, the City would need to repeal the remnants of the specific plan and c onsider new land use designation (s) and zone(s) for the properties outside the new District of Jurupa Valley S pecific Plan area that are primarily located along 34th Street.
The Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan was envisioned as a master planned community that allows for the development of the following land uses (See Figure 4):
Residential – 1,196 Units (single-family and multiple family) Commercial site – 20.4 acres up to 186,000 square foot shopping center Page | 6
Parks and Open Space – 17.55 acres
Church Site – 25 acres
Elementary School – 12 acres
Figure 4: Emerald Meadows Ranch Land Use Plan
BACKGROUND OF ENTITLEMENT PROCESS
City Council
Request for Initiation of General Plan Amendmen t: On April 2, 2020, the applicant requested that the City Council initiate a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to allow a mixture of uses including warehouse and distribution uses (not permitted outside the General Plan Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlays) and commercial, retail, and lodging uses at th e project site and offered to enter into a development agreement with the City if the GPA was initiated. The City Council voted to deny the initiation of the GPA.
Second Request for Initiation of General Plan Amendment : On April 1, 2021, the City Council considered the applicant’s second request to initiate a GPA to allow a 250 -acre mixed-used project to include warehouse and distribution uses outside of the Mira Loma and Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlays. This application was under a r evised project named “The District at Rubidoux. ” After discussion, the City Council voted to table the item and allow the applicant to present more information at a future study session.
Page | 7
City Council Study Session: On May 6, 2021, the City Council conducted a Study Session during which the applicant presented the proposed project and addressed issues raised by the City Council and members of the public regarding a wide range of topics including truck circulation, layout of warehousing, housing units, pha sing of construction, open space, community benefits, etc. After discussion with the applicant, the City Council took no action. The applicant stated their intention to return to a future City Council meeting to request initiation of a GPA to allow warehouse uses outside of the Mira Loma and Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlays.
Third Request for Initiation of General Plan Amendment: On June 3, 2021 , the City Council considered the applicant’s third request to initiate a GPA to allow warehouse and distribution uses outside of the Mira Loma and Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlays and develop a 250 -acre mixed use project including ware house and distribution uses, retail/commercial uses, hospitality uses, residential uses, and public open space through a Specific Plan and a development agreement to offset any negative impacts of the proposed warehouse and logistic uses. The City Council voted to initiate the GPA to allow the applicant to submit and process entitlement applications for the proposed Specific Plan and Development Agreement for a 250 -acre mixed use project that would include 1.5 million square feet of warehouse and distribution uses at the project site.
Planning Commission Study Session
On March 22, 2023, the draft Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission as a Study Session item. The staff presentation described the proposed Specific Plan including various components of the land use plan, open space, trail network, circulation plan, development standards and permitted uses, signage, freeway gateways, landscaping, and the status of the Environmental Impact Report. The applicant also provided a brief presentatio n including the history of the site and their vision for the project.
The excerpt of the Planning Commission minutes is provided as Attachment 6 and a summary of the Planning Commission feedback is provided as Attachment 7.
Planning Commission Public Hearing
On August 23 , 202 3, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered the proposed project.
Public comments in favor of the Project included the following:
The Project would provide local union construction jobs and long-term local employment opportunities.
The Project would provide new shopping, dining opportunities for local residents that are only available outside the City.
The Project would provide new public parks for the City and local neighborhood. The Project would provide new roadway improvements.
Page | 8
The Project would beautify the area with new streetscape improvements, trails, sidewalks, trees, and landscaping.
The Project woul d activate a long -term vacant site and eliminate blight, illegal dumping, homeless encampments, and crime.
The Project community benefits would outweigh potential impacts from industrial uses.
Public comments against the Project included the following:
Increased traffic and congestion in the area.
Increased truck traffic would negatively impact air quality and would have negative health impacts.
New industrial uses were never intended to be located outside of the Mira Loma and Agua Mansa overlay areas.
Project does not comply with City’s Environmental Justice goals and policies. Adequate separation and buffer of residential uses from proposed industr ial uses is not provided.
Proposed truck routes would create negative impacts to residents north of the project site.
The Planning Commission deliberated and discussed the following items:
1. Issues related to the potential negative impacts of the proposed industrial uses and allowing the Agua Mansa Warehous e and Distribution Center Overlay to be applied to the industrial portion of the Project.
2. Potential negative impacts of truck traffic.
3. Future improvements to the SR-60 Rubidoux Boulevard Interchange and how the Project would help expedite the required studies.
4. Questioned why the developer needed the industrial uses to make the Project feasible.
5. Adequacy of buffering and screening of industrial uses from residential uses.
6. Support for the proposed commercial, hotel, parks, and residential land uses.
7. Support for the positive economic impacts the Project would bring to the City.
8. Support for the community benefits the Project would bring to the City.
9. Support for the short -term and long-term employment opportunities the Project would bring.
10. Environmental Justice to an existing underserved area by bringing jobs, parks, streetscape improvements, new landscaping and buffering , shopping and dining opportunities, and long-term community benefits.
Page | 9
11. Overall Project benefits outweigh any potential negative impacts.
After the discussion, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-18 (Attachment 8), on a 3-2 vote, recommending that the City Council (1) certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program; and (2) approve Master Application (MA) No. 21347 (GPA21010, SP21001, DA21001, & TTM38318) approving the Project.
The Planning Commission also recommended the addition of two engineering conditions of approval related to interchange improvements to the Rubidoux Boulevard and State Route 60 and the removal of a condition that requires a fair share contribution to the Hall Avenue at 24th Street traffic condition.
Excerpts from the August 23, 2023 Planning Commission deliberation is provided as Attachment 9.
ANALYSIS
SPECIFIC PLAN
The proposed Specific Plan document (Attachment No. 2 -Exhibit C) is divided into five sections as outlined below:
Section 1 – Introduction: This section outlines the organization of the Specific Plan; the project summary; local and regional context and setting; site conditions and surrounding land uses; Speci fic Plan background; purpose and intent; and authority to prepare the Specific Plan.
As outlined in Section 1, a specific plan is a planning mechanism to ensure that projects in the specific plan area develop in an organized and cohesive manner. Specific p lans incorporate a framework for the development of land use, circulation, safety, and infrastructure including drainage, sewer, and water facilities in accordance with a jurisdiction’s General Plan. Specific plans also set the development standards and guidelines for implementing projects within the specific plan area relating to architecture, urban design, and landscaping.
Section 2 – Development Plan : This section includes the overall vision, guiding principles, and project objectives for future developm ent within the Specific Plan area.
This section also provides the land use plan for the Specific Plan area and defines the land use designations unique to the development. The circulation, street improvements, infrastructure and utilities, emergency access, grading, and public services plans are also described at a conceptual level to guide future development and infrastructure improvements.
Land Use Summary: The proposed Specific Plan contains seven major land use areas or districts as depicted in the Land Use Plan (see Figure 3) and described in the Land Use Summary table (Table 2).
Page | 10
Land
Use
Gross
Acreage
Non-
Residential
Square Feet
(SF)
Hotel
Rooms
Dwelling
Unit
COMMERCIAL
Neighborhood 20.4 160,000 --- ---
Retail 70.31
1,200,000 --- ---
Existing Non-Conforming 1.1 --- ---
Tourist 5.9 112,500 160 ---
Commercial Sub-Total 97.7 1,472,50
0 160 ---
RESIDENTIAL
Highest Density Residential 42.0 --- --- 1,196
25 du/acre
Residential Sub-Total 42.0 --- --- 1,196
BUSINESS PARK
Business Park
Existing Non-Conforming
6.8 1.0
30,000 ---
---
---
---
Business Park Sub-Total 7.8 30,000 --- ---
INDUSTRIAL/LOGISTICS
Industrial 67.3 1,500,00
0 --- ---
Industrial Sub-total 67.3 1,500,00
0 --- ---
OPEN SPACE
Open Space 11.1 --- --- ---
Open Space Sub-Total 11.1 --- --- ---
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Public Streets and Parkway 15.8 --- --- ---
Public Facility 6.6 --- --- ---
Public Imp Sub-Total 22.4 --- --- ---
TOTALS 248.3
Acres
3,002,500 SF 160 Rooms 1,196 Units
1. Includes 52.4 acres of Commercial Retail-Integrated Overlay Table 2: Specific Plan Land Use Summary Table
Land Use Designations:
Commercial Neighborhood: The Commercial Neighborhood Land Use Area,
20.4 acres, is located at the western portion of the Specific Plan and fronts Rubidoux Boulevard. Primary access is provided from A Street with signage along Rubidoux Boulevard for clear identification and wayfinding. This land use area envisions convenient retail sales and services primarily focused on supporting local residents and employees through smaller -scale, pedestrian- oriented commercial development. The Commercial Neighborhood Land Use Area would permit individual, smal l-scale retail establishments including food markets, convenience stores, restaurants, other retail sales, and personal Page | 11
services (gyms, health and beauty, dry cleaning). This land use area allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.60.
Commercial Retail: The Commercial Retail Land Use Area , 71.4 acres, is in the center of the Specific Plan and serves as one of the commercial core areas.
The area serves as a transition to the Commercial Neighborhood Land Use Area. Primary access and identification signage for major retail tenants are located along A Street and integrated with adjacent land use areas through secondary access points. The Commercial Retail Land Use Area encourages regional shopping centers with large major anchor/big -box retail tenants supported by smaller retail establishments, grocery stores, restaurants, drug stores, entertainment, and personal service uses in multi -tenant buildings and/or freestanding commercial pads. This land use area allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50.
Commercial Retail- Integrated Use: The Commercial Retail Land Use Area also includes an overlay to allow for an “integrated retail use” which is a business or businesses that combine their various business operations into a single building. Each individual Commercial Retail - Integrated Use would be required to have a minimum of 10% of its total floor area occupied by a retail showroom for display and sale of products to the public and may include the following business operations: product assembly/light man ufacturing; warehousing; customer pick -up and shipping/receiving. A building for a Commercial Retail -Integrated Use shall be designed with a minimum of 500 -foot buffer between a loading dock door and any residential dwelling unit within a Residential zone/ district. Examples of this type of use may include a furniture and home goods retail store; a tile store; a carpeting store; a fireplace and mantle store; and similar type businesses that may integrate various components into their operations. The Commercial Retail -Integrated Use Overlay Area covers 52.4 acre of the 70.3-acre Commercial Retail Land Use Area.
Commercial Tourist: The Commercial Tourist (CT) Land Use , 5.9 acres, is located within two areas of the Specific Plan. One CT Land Use are a is proposed at Hall Avenue and 30th Street with access off of 30th Street, and another along Rubidoux Boulevard, south of the Commercial Land Use Area with access off A Street. The Commercial Tourist Land Use Area promotes the development of commercial u ses designed to serve the needs of tourists and the vacationing and motoring public through hospitality and entertainment related uses. Primary permitted uses would include hotels, exhibit/concert halls, tourist visitor centers, markets, dining, educational services, and electric vehicle super charging stations. This land use area allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.70.
Business Park: The Business Park Land Use Area, 7.8 acres, is located at the northern portion of the Specific Plan, between the SR -60 Eastbound onramp Page | 12
and the Industrial/Logistics Land Use Area along 30th Street. Primary access for tenants would be located along 30th Street and C Street. The Business Park Land Us e Area envisions employee -intensive uses, including research and development, technology centers, corporate offices, light manufacturing, clean industry, and supporting retail uses. This land use area allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) up to 0.60.
Industrial/Logistics: The Industrial Land Use Area (67.3 acres) is at the eastern portion of the Specific Plan boundary, adjacent to the Santa Ana River.
The southern boundary of the Industrial Land Use Area includes an expansive landscaped paseo to screen and buffer from the adjacent Residential Land Use Area to the south. The Industrial/Logistics Land Use Area is intended to provide a wide range of industrial uses including research and development; light manufacturing, assembly and processing of manufactured goods and materials; warehousing and distribution includin g e -commerce, high -cube logistics and cross-dock facilities. This land use area allows a maximum FAR up to 0.60.
Residential: The Residential Land Use Area , 42 acres) is generally located along the southern portion of the Specific Plan, away from higher volume roadways such as Rubidoux Boulevard and SR -60 closest to existing residential neighborhoods to the south of the Project site with access provided off A and B Str eets. The Residential Land Use Area allows for a variety of housing types including single family and multi -family units up to 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) with no minimum. The maximum buildout for the Residential Land Use is 1,196 dwelling units. Th e Residential Land Use Area would incorporate active and passive recreational and open space areas with landscaped parkways, trails, and private common area amenities. Open Space: The Open Space Land Use Area accommodates 11.1 acres of open space areas f or residents, employees, and visitors in the form of neighborhood parks, urban parks, recreational facilities, community centers, play areas, greenbelts, and off-street trails. In addition to the Open Space Land Use Areas proposed, residential development will incorporate private and common areas that will expand and connect to the open space areas, and adjacent uses. Figure 5 depicts the proposed Open Space Plan.
Page | 13
Figure 5: Open Space Plan
Circulation Plan: The Circulation Plan, depicted in Figure 6, provides new roadways and streets to accommodate traffic generated by the anticipated Specific Plan land uses as well as facilitate internal vehicular access to the surrounding areas. Portions of existing roads in the Specific Plan Area would be vacated and absorbed into the Specific Plan Land Use Areas in which they reside.
The main roads of the Circulation Plan are as follows:
Rubidoux Boulevard (between SR-60 and 34th Street)
Frontage Road – this road is the western portion of existing 30th Street 30th Street – this is the eastern portion of existing 30th Street A Street – connects Rubidoux Boulevard and B Street
B Street – connects A Street to 30th Street
Wallace Street (between 34th and A & B Streets)
34th Street (between Rubidoux Boulevard and Santa Ana River)
Page | 14
Figure 6: Circulation Plan
Truck Circulation: Due to the mix of industrial, commercial, and residential land uses, measures to direct truck traffic away from residential uses have been incorporated into the Circulation Plan. The circulation plan incorporates a roundabout at the intersection of A Street, B Street and Wallace Avenue to deter and redirect truck traffic away from the residential land uses within the project area and to the south along Wallace Street and 34th Street. Gateway monuments will be implemented, which will create flexibility in height of vehicles acceptable to enter roadways. In addition, signage, turning restrictions and other measures may be incorporated as deemed necessary to limit truck movement away from residential land use as part of the site development permit review process. Figures 7 and 8 depict the inbound and outbound truck circulation plans.
Inbound from Westbound SR-60
Trucks traveling westbound on SR-60 would exit at Rubidoux Boulevard and enter the development via northbound Rubidoux Boulevard turning right on 26th Street and right onto Hall Avenue to 30th Street and B Street within the project site to access the Industrial and Commercial Retail land use areas.
Inbound from Eastbound SR-60
Trucks traveling eastbound on SR-60 would exit at Rubidoux Boulevard and would enter the project site via Frontage Road to 30th Street and B Street to access the Industrial and Commercial Retail land use areas.
Page | 15
Figure 7: Inbound Truck Circulation
Outbound to Eastbound SR-60
Truck traffic leaving the Industrial and Commercial Retail land use areas would access eastbound SR -60 via an internal access drive north of the Commercial Land Use Area to the Frontage Road / SR60 on-ramp.
Outbound to Eastbound SR-60
Truck traffic leaving the Industrial and Commercial Retail land use areas would access the westbound SR-60 via 30th Street to Hall Avenue north, making a left turn at 26th Street and a left turn at Rubidoux Boulevard to the westbound SR-60 on-ramp. A traffic signal will be installed as part of the Project at the intersection of 26th Street and Rubidoux Boulevard to facilitate increased traffic volumes and turning movements and insure adequate traffic flow.
The City will need to amend the approved City truck routes to include the proposed project truck routes . Staff will bring back a separate request to the City Council for initiation of an amendment to the City’s Truck Route Ordinance.
Page | 16
Figure 8: Outbound Truck Circulation
Truck Route Compliance Measures: The applicant has worked closely with the City Engineering Department to develop a series of improvements that can be implemented along Hall Avenue to keep trucks out of residential neighborhoods off of 28th Street and Hall Avenue north of 2 6th Street. The two primary intersections of concern are at Hall Avenue and 28th Street and Hall Avenue and 26th Street. Each of these intersections is addressed below.
Hall Avenue and 28th Street
Trucks traveling outbound from the Project site as described above will travel north along Hall Avenue past 28th Street to 26th Street. In order to prevent trucks from turning left onto 28th Street, the Project would be required to install a series of raised medians, a traffic circle and curbs at the intersection that will prevent trucks from turning onto 28th, while allowing passenger cars and emergency vehicles.
Figure 9 includes an example of the truck turning restriction measures that w ould be installed, and also includes the truck turning templates that illustrate that these measures will prevent trucks from making the turning movements, and also show that trucks that are following the designated truck route can safely pass through this intersection.
Page | 17
In addition to the physical improvements, the Project would be required to install signage to alert truck driver s that no trucks are allowed to turn left on 28th Street from Hall Avenue and to direct trucks to the designated truck route. The final design and construction of these truck restriction measures will be to City standards and installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for either a commercial or industrial building.
Figure 9: Hall Avenue and 28th Street Truck Turning Exhibit Hall Avenue and 26th Street
To prevent outbound trucks from traveling north of 26th Street and to force them to turn west (make a left turn), the Project would be required to install an overhead barrier, median and signage.
The overhead barrier would have a hanging bar to limit the vehicle height across the northbound lane on Hall Avenue that a truck attempting to travel north would hit. The overhead barrier will have a bar that will set the height limit as well as signage. This overhead barrier is used in neighboring cities to direct trucks to the designated truck routes, while allowing automobile and emergency vehicles to travel unimpeded.
In addition to the overhead barrier, a raised median would be installed on the north end of the inters ection that will decrease the lane width, making it difficult for a
Page | 18
truck to travel north. Figure 10 shows an example of the overhead barrier and signage that is used in the City of Riverside. This exhibit also shows the placement of the raised median and narrowed north bound lane that combined will force the trucks west. These improvements would be required to be designed to City standards and installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for either a commercial or industrial building, whichever occurs first.
Figure 10: Hall Avenue and 26th Street Truck Turning Exhibit Commercial Truck Enforcement
Section 5.2 of the Specific Plan contains provisions for enforcement of the City ’s Truck Ordinances. The provisions require the owners and lessees of non - residential properties in the Specific Plan to take responsibility to ensure trucks servicing their non-residential buildings comply with the City ’s Truck Ordinances.
The provisions require the developer and the owners of non-residential properties within the Specific Plan Area to:
Notify all truck companies and truck drivers that they must comply with City’s Truck Ordinances through means and text approved by the Director of Community Development;
Be jointly liable with trucking companies and truck drivers for violations of the City’s Truck Ordinances;
Be subject to administrative citations pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code; and
Consent to the City ’s use of cameras and other technologies on public streets to ident ify truck or other vehicles originating from or traveling to commercial or industrial properties within the Specific Plan Area that are in violation of the City’s Truck Ordinances.
Improvements to the SR-60/Rubidoux Blvd. Interchange: The Rubidoux Bouleva rd and SR-60 interchange will be improved to an interim condition to include additional lanes at each on/off ramp.
Page | 19
Ultimate SR -60 interchange improvements are included as part of the City ’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project. If the City ’s ultimate improvements are completed prior to interim improvement installations, then Applicant will be required to provide a cash-in-lieu of construction for all or a portion of the required interim improvements. The ultimate improvements will require the reconfiguration of the interchange. As part of the CIP project, the City has completed a Project Study Report (PSR) which identifies various interchange alternatives. The next phase of the CIP project includes completion of the Project Approval & Environmental Document (PAED) which requires coordination with Caltrans. City staff will be soliciting proposals for a consultant to complete the PAED phase and bring the item to Council at a future meeting.
VMT Measures: Mitigation measures are required for the Project to reduce the project’s vehicle miles traveled ( VMT). These measures are based on coordination with the City staff and the recommendations contained within the City ’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines and the Western Riverside Council of governments (WRCOG) TDM Strategies Evaluation Memo. A summary of the VMT mitigation measures is provided below:
Provide Class III bike route along Crestmore Road from 34th Street to Mission Boulevard.
Improvements to the Mission Boulevard Bridge over the Santa Ana River near Mount Rubidoux will accommodate two 12 -ft lanes, two 14 -ft lanes, two 8-ft shoulders and a 4 -ft median. A 12-ft multipurpose trail with barrier separation from vehicular traffic will be located along t he south side of the bridge in lieu of standard sidewalks on each side. This will provide a connection to Santa Ana River Trail via Mission Boulevard. Current 34th Street includes some sidewalks and curb/ gutter, but a majority includes unpaved shoulders. The project shall provide up to 7,800 linear feet of pedestrian street improvements in coordination with the City. The City Engineer can approve alternative design with future street improvements that provide pedestrian connections as intended in the City of Jurupa Valley Complete Streets Safety Assessment . Such alternative design can consider using the on-street parking on the north shoulder for a 4-foot pedestrian sidewalk. On the south side between the pavement edge and front yard fence lines, an alterna tive design could install a standard 4 - foot sidewalk protected from traffic with a raised feature such as an intermittent asphalt dike.
All future projects in the Specific Plan area will incorporate the following design improvements as applicable, which include, but are not limited to improving streets with curb, gutter sidewalk, and landscaping; traffic calming devices; and multi-use pedestrian trails and bike paths/lanes. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements:
Page | 20
Non-Residential Uses:
The Project Applicant shall consult with the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) on the need to provide infrastructure to connect the Project with transit services and to relocate the existing bus stop on northbound Rubidoux Boulevard at Frontage Road southward to the intersection of Rubidoux Boulevard and proposed A Street. The applicant shall fund such relocation. The Project Applicant shall fund a study on behalf of RTA to determine whether adding bus service along proposed A Street in the Project site woul d be warranted by potential ridership and be practicable for RTA. Improvements may include installing bus turnouts, shelters, or bus stops at the site. Project shall implement measures including, but not be limited to, the following: ride -matching assistan ce; preferential carpool parking; flexible work schedules for carpools; transportation coordinators; providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides; designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride -sharing vehic les; and including bicycle end of trip facilities including bike parking, bike lockers, showers, and personal lockers.
Residential Units:
Owner-Occupied Units. Upon a residential dwelling being sold or offered for sale, the Project Applicant shall notify and offer to the buyer or prospective buyer materials describing public transit, ridesharing, and non-motorized commuting opportunities available in the vicinity of the Project.
Rental Units. Upon a residential dwelling being rented or offered for rent, t he Project Applicant shall notify and offer to the tenant or prospective tenant, materials describing public transit, ridesharing, and non -motorized commuting opportunities in the vicinity of the Project.
Roadway Sections : The Specific Plan contains conce ptual street improvements as described and depicted below:
A Street is classified as a Modified Arterial Roadway and serves as the primary circulation route for east to westbound movements to and from Rubidoux Boulevard within the Specific Plan area. The street section accommodates 94-feet of right-of-way with one 16- foot and one 12 -foot travel lanes in each direction and a 12 -foot raised median for enhanced landscaping. One side of the roadway include s an 11-foot parkway inclusive of a 6 -foot sidewalk along the northern commercial retail side and 15 -feet parkway inclusive of a 10-foot multi-use trail along the southern residential right of way. A 5-foot Landscape strip is adjacent to the curb on both sides of the street for buffering and beautification purposes. B Street is classified as a Modified Arterial between the Page | 21
roundabout and the landscaped paseo within the Industrial Land Use area. Figure 11 depicts the A Street and B Street roadway section.
Figure 11: A & B Streets Full Roadway Section
B Street and 30 th Street are classified as an Industrial Collector. The B Street section accommodates 77 feet of right-of-way and the 30th Street section accommodates 72 feet of right-of-way. Both sections have two travel lanes measuring 20 feet in each direction, with 12-foot raised median. The B Street roadway includes 10-foot parkway inclusive of a 5-foot sidewalk along the eastern commercial retail side and 15-feet parkway inclusive of a 10 -foot multi -use tr ail along the western industrial right -of-way. The 30 th Street roadway include s a 10 -foot parkway on both sides with a 5-foot sidewalk along the northern side. Figure 12-A depicts the B Street and Figure 12-B depicts the 30th Street roadway section.
Figure 12-A: B Street Industrial Collector Full Roadway Section
Page | 22
Figure 12-B: 30th Street Industrial Collector Full Roadway Section Frontage Road (30 th Street) has a 48 -foot right-of-way and is classified as a Modified Local frontage street and runs in a west -east direction, providing access to SR -60, Hall Street and 30th Street from Rubidoux Boulevard. Frontage Road terminates into 30th Street at the intersection of Hall Avenue. Figure 13 depicts the Frontage Road roadway section.
Figure 13: Frontage Road Full Roadway Section
Hall Avenue is classified as a Collector Street and runs in a north -south direction, providing access to the Specific Plan area from north of SR -60. Hall Avenue terminates into a T-intersection at 30th Street/Frontage Street. Hall Avenue will accommodate 66 feet of right-of-way with two travels lanes in each direction measuring 10 and 12 feet and 11-foot parkway, inclusive of a 5 -foot sidewalk. Center medians are striped. There is a small portion of Hall Street within the project that will be improved and tie into the existing Hall Street bridge over SR-60. Figure 14 depicts the Hall Avenue roadway section.
Page | 23
Figure 14: Hall Avenue Full Roadway Section
Wallace Street and 34th Street are local streets with 60 feet of right-of-way with two travel lanes measuring 12 feet in each direction, and 10 -foot parkway inclusive of a 5 -foot sidewalk. Figure 15 depicts the Wallace Street and 34th Street roadway section.
Figure 15: Wallace Street and 34th Street Roadway Section Rubidoux Boulevard, located along the western boundary of the Specific Plan area, is designated as a Major Highway. The roadway section fronting the Project site will include two northbound travel lanes and a 6-foot sidewalk and 30-foot parkway; and two southbound through, and two left turn lanes onto A Street into the Project site and a 6- foot sidewalk. Figure 16 depicts a segment, from center line to easterly ROW of Rubidoux Boulevard where proposed improvements include new sidewalks and parkways.
Page | 24
Figure 16: Rubidoux Boulevard Roadway Section
A Roundabout would be located at the intersection of Wallace Street, A Street , and B Street. The Roundabout provides a significant traffic control measure to deter truck traffic, while providing an amenity to the community. Two travel lanes are provided, measuring 15 feet in each direction, an 8-foot sidewalk as well as an interior parkway measuring 130 feet in total. The large parkway would consist of a 10 -foot mortared cobblestone border around the street adjacent edge. The interior parkway would include landscaping and decorative boulders native to the region. Figure 17 depicts t he roundabout roadway section plan.
Figure 17: Roundabout Plan and Roadway Section
Trail Network: The Specific Plan provides multi-use pedestrian trails, sidewalks, and bike paths/lanes as a means of connecting residents, visitors, and employees with the various land uses in the Specific Plan area and the surrounding community . This network of walkable and bikeable pathways throughout the Specific Plan area will provide environmental and health benefits and also help to create a greater sense of community through connection. Figure 18 depicts the proposed trail network. 30’ min.
(varies)
Page | 25
Figure 18: Trail Network
Section 3- Land Use and Development Standards: This Section includes the land use and development standards to establish the desired physical form and identity of the built environment suitable for each land use and would constitute the zoning for the Specific Plan Area. Section 3 contains the allowable primary land uses, a ctivities, or facilities permitted within the Industrial, Business Park, Commercial Retail, Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Tourist, and Residential land use areas of the Specific Plan; and the types of permits required to establish the uses and activi ties. This section also contains the development standards that control the physical dimensions and location of structures, and site improvements amongst the various land use areas including building heights, floor area ratio, lot size, and setbacks. It al so includes standards for parking, landscaping, lighting, walls and fencing, outdoor storage, and signs.
Allowable Land Uses : Section 3 contains Table 3-1 that identifies the proposed allowable land uses and entitlement requirements in the Specific Plan b y land use area (Industrial, Commercial Retail, Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Tourist, Business Park, and Residential) . The table is organized by the following land use categories with specific land uses listed by category:
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Retail and Services
Professional Offices
Recreation, Education, Utilities, and Public Assembly Residential
Page | 26
Industrial
Temporary Events/Uses
Specific Plan Table 3-1 identifies the permit requirements for each listed land use type by land use area (Industrial, Commercial Retail, Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Tourist, Business Park, and Residential). The permits required by land use are identified as follows:
P – Permitted Use
SDP – Site Development Permit required
CUP – Conditional Use Permit required
A – Accessory Use to an allowed principal use
Residential Development Standards: The density for residential land use would be up to 25 dwelling units per acre. The development intensity provides for a range of anticipated residential building types , allowing single family, and multi -family dwellings, including condominiums and apartments. Residential development within the Specific Plan area will be subject to the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and the developer would be required to either provide affordable units within the project or pay the applicable in lieu fee that would go to the City’s affordable housing fund .
Residential development standard highlights include the following:
Building Heights – 35 feet for single-family and 50 feet for multi-family. Setbacks – 20 feet front, and 10 feet rear for single-family; and 10 feet front, and 10 feet rear for multi-family
10 to 15 -foot minimum street landscape setbacks for multi -family development
10-foot landscaped parkways for single-family development Multi-family development standards include private and common open space
50-foot setback buffer for residential structures adjacent to commercial uses Commercial and Industrial Development Standards : Key commercial and industrial development standards include the following:
Building heights ranging from 45 feet to 75 feet
Floor Area Ratios (FAR) ranging from 50% to 70%
Minimum street landscape setbacks ranging from 10 feet to 25 feet Minimum street building setbacks ranging from 10 feet to 25 feet Loading and truck dock area screening requirements
Page | 27
Service area, storage, maintenance, and refuge collection area screening requirements
Land Use Buffer:
Industrial: A 750-foot buffer is required between any industrial building and any new or existing residential dwelling unit within a Residential Zone/district. The 750-foot buffer is to be measured from the truck dock door closest to the nearest dwelling unit.
Integrated Commercial : A 500 -foot buffer is required between any commercial retail -integrated building and any new or existing residential dwelling unit within a Residential Zone/district. The 500-foot buffer shall be measured from the truck dock door closest to the nearest dwelling unit. The Land Use Buffer area can be used for automobile parking, landscaping, infrastructure improvements, public facilities and public parks/open space pursuant to Specific Plan Section 3.4, Public Park/Open Space Standards. There shall be no new residential dwelling units within the land use buffer area. Figure 19 below illustrates the landscape treatment including berming, up to 8-feet high decorative wall, trees, and open space area that would be located in the buffer area between the industrial land use area and residential uses.
Figure 19: Industrial Buffer
Parking Requirements: Section 3 contains a required off -street parking table that identifies the minimum number of parking spaces for the uses listed under their respective categories consistent with the Allowable Land Use table. In addition, Section 3 contains the following parking and loading standards:
Design standards ( dimensions, striping screening, shading, aisles width s) for off-street parking and loading
Provisions for tandem parking
Managed and valet parking
Automated, semi-automated and stacked parking
Electric Vehicle charging stations
Page | 28
Bicycle parking
Outdoor Storage : Outdoor storage is permitted only as an accessory use in the Industrial and Business Park land use areas and only associated with an integrated retail use in the Commercial Retail land use area. Outdoor storage would be subject to screening with a combination of landscaping, walls, and/or berms. Outdoor storage would be limited to a maximum of 20,000 square feet in area per principal use. Area over this limit would require a conditional use permit.
Landscaping: Section 3 contains landscape development s tandards and requirements including the following:
Minimum site landscaping requirements
Minimum number and size of trees
Minimum landscape area dimensions
Shading requirements
Parking area landscape requirements
Streetscape landscape requirements
Walls, F ences, and Screening : Section 3 contains development standards and requirements for walls, fences, and screening to ensure that walls and fences are designed to complement the architecture and design of buildings and provide adequate screening and buffering.
Lighting: Section 3 contains development standards and requirements for lighting that promotes lighting standards that contribute to the building identity and provide enhanced safety and security for pedestrians and vehicles.
Signage: Section 3 contains sign standards to establish a coordinated approach for exterior signage to form the Project’s identification while achieving a unified attractive appearance. The sign standards are intended to provide guidelines that create and maintain well-designed and high-quality signage that complement the structures and uses to which they relate, including identifying the individual commercial and industrial land use areas, residential neighborhoods along with vehicular entry points that direct vehicles to their on -site destinations. Signage would enhance the pedestrian experience through the design of way -finding components, such as directories, directional signage, and destination identifiers.
Freeway Signs: The Specific Plan proposes to allow freeway signs for both project tenant identification (on-premises), and non-tenant advertising (off-premises) also known as a billboard . The Specific Plan provides for three (3) Digital and/or combination Digital/ Static Freeway Signs that allow Non -Tenant “Off-Premises” and/or Tenant “On-Premises” Advertising. The freeway signs have a height limit of 65 feet with a double side display area of 675 square feet per side. There is an existing billboard sign along SR-60 west of the Hall Avenue bridge that will remain.
Any new freeway sign with off-premise advertising (billboard) would be subject to Page | 29
approval of an agreement with the City for City public services announcements and shared revenue. Figure 20 depicts the proposed project and freeway sign locations.
Overall signage criteria and design for the Specific Plan area would be established through a Master Sign Program (MSP) that establishes the standards and guidelines for all signs within the Specific Plan. The MSP will also provide guida nce for the general location and design of project‐level signage.
A Project Sign Plan for individual development projects within the Specific Plan area is required as outlined below.
Project Sign Plan – Shopping center, Business Park, or other multi -use site, multi-tenant buildings
Project Sign Plan – Freestanding Freeway Signs, Non -Tenant “Off-Premises” and Tenant “On-Premises”
Sign Plan – Single stand-alone user that is not part of a shopping center or multi-use site
The City will need to amend the Outdoor Advertising Overlay section of the Code to allow for additional billboards in the Project area. Staff will return to the City Council with a request to initiate a Code amendment to include the allowance for the additional billboards.
Figure 20: Proposed Sign Location
Page | 30
Section 4- Design Guidelines: This section provides a framework for the design of individual projects within the Specific Plan area to establish a consistent design expression among site planning, architectural and landscape components, while allowing reasonable flexibility in design and implementation approach. The section includes design guidelines for project gateways; industrial, warehouse and business park buildings; commercial buildings; residential buildings; lighting; landscaping; and signage.
Gateway Features : The Specific Pla n will provide enhanced streetscapes and parkways that will incorporate prominent community and project gateway features with enhanced landscape areas, and monumentation or signage. (See Figure 21) at the following locations:
Rubidoux Boulevard and Frontage Street, and A Street
A Street and Wallace Street Roundabout
B Street and 30th Street
Figure 21: Gateway Treatment Location Plan
Page | 31
Industrial, Warehouse and Business Park Design : The design guidelines emphasize a contemporary architectural style for the industrial, warehouse and business park buildings within the Specific Plan that reduces massing with the use of structural articulation. The guidelines provide provisions for building form, colors and materials and finishes, entries and windows, screening and design for truck docks and storage, screening for rooftop and ground -mounted equipment, trash enclosure design and screening, and outdoor employee amenities. These design guidelines for Industrial and Warehouse Architecture are depicted in Figure 22 and for Business Park Architecture in Figure 23 below.
Figure 22: Industrial and Warehouse Architecture Design
Figure 23: Business Park Architecture Design
Commercial Design: The design guidelines propose an “Agrarian” architectural style referencing the historical agricultural heritage of the Inland Empire for
Page | 32
commercial shopping centers within the Specific Plan. The guidelines require site design and building orientation th at encourages the creation of functional community gathering places and amenities for the enjoyment of individuals, families, employees, and residents of surrounding areas. They also include requirements for screening for rooftop and ground -mounted equipment, trash enclosure design and screening . The design guidelines for commercial architecture and commercial amenities are depicted in Figures 24 and 25 below.
Figure 24: Commercial Architecture Design
Outdoor Living
Rooms for
adults and
youth
Outdoor
Page | 33
Figure 25: Commercial Amenities
Commercial Integrated Design : The design guidelines emphasize a contemporary architectural style for the Commercial Integrated buildings within the Specific Plan similar to the industrial and warehouse design that reduces massing with the use of structural articulation. The guidelines provide provisions for building form, colors and materials and finishes, entries and windows, screening and design for truck docks and storage, screening for rooftop and ground-mounted equipment, trash enclosure design and screening . These design guidelines for Commercial Integrated Architecture are depicted in Figure 26 below.
Figure 26: Commercial Integrated Architecture Design
Residential Design Standards: The primary objective of the residential design standards is to provide a variety of housing styles that exhibit excellent design across an array of architectural themes and styles consistent with the overall Specific Plan objectives. Each residential neighborhood will provide diversity in design through consider ate attention to architectural character and floor plan livability. Consistent with State law , the design standards for residential development within the Specific Plan area are intended to be objective in nature to ensure certainty for the developer and for the City in review of residential development These design styles for Residential Architecture are depicted in Figure 27 – Residential Detached for single -family dwellings and Figure 28 – Residential Attached for multi-family dwellings below.
Page | 34
Figure 27: Residential Detached Design
Figure 28: Residential Attached Design
Landscape Design: The landscape design guidelines aim to enhance the built environment with aesthetically pleasing and drought -tolerant landscaping along public roadways, provide a buffer to adjacent areas and between different land uses, and to soften hardscapes and buildings . Landscaping is an integral component to establishing identi ty of place as well as reinforcing the street hierarchy. Figure 29 below depicts the Landscape Concept Plan.
Page | 35
Figure 29: Landscape Concept Plan
Park Concepts: Park concepts include public gathering areas, inclusive tot lots, a dog park, themed gardens, and passive use spaces such as shaded barbeque and picnic areas. These park areas shape a network of public green spaces that are connected through a greater sy stem of multi -use trails. All park areas will be dedicated for public use and maintained via a community facilities district or similar entity. The park concept plan includes a Neighborhood Park, a Linear Park, and a Community Park totaling 11 acres as depicted in Figure 30 below.
Page | 36
Figure 30: Park Concept Plan
Section 5 – Implementation and Administration : This section describes the administrative processes that the City will use to review proposed development projects and infrastructure improvements. The section includes the following topics: Responsibility and Enforcement; Applicability and Interpretation ; Severability; Administration; Development and Land Use Review Procedures; Financing and Fees; Community Benefit Contributions; and Maintenance Responsibilities.
Development of the Specific Plan will occur through the processing of a variety of entitlements for implementing projects, including, but not limited to tract maps, parcel maps, grading plans, site development permits, conditional use permits, and sign permits.
All implementing projects would be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and processing. The Community Development Director shall have the authority to approve Site Development Permit applications which substantially conform to the Specific Plan. Conditional use permits, certain tentative subdivision maps, and other entitlements associated with development in the Specific Plan area would require Planning Commission review and approval as required by the Municipal Code.
In addition, phasing of development requirements are included that require at least 60,000 square feet of the Commercial Neighborhood development to be under construction prior to certificate of occupancy for any building in the Industrial Land Use area.
Page | 37
GENERAL PLAN
Amendments: The project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) for several proposed changes to the General Plan:
Change the underlying General Plan land use designations associated with the existing Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan to Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Retail, Commercial Tourist, Light Industrial, High est Density Residential, Public Facilities, and Open Space -Recreation to correspond with the proposed The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan Land Use Areas. The General Plan Specific Plan Overlay designation will remain on the project site; Establish the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay on the
67.3 acre Industrial/Logistics (I-L) Land Use Area of the proposed Specific Plan; and
Create a new General Plan Overlay, the "Commercial Retail -Integrated Use” Overlay and establish the Commerci al Retail - Integrated Use Overlay on a
52.4-acre portion of the Commercial Retail Land Use Area of the Specific Plan.
Amendment to the Land Use Designations of Project Site. The project includes the change of General Plan land use designation to coordinate with the proposed Specific Plan Land Use Designations as outlined in Table 3 and Figure 31 below:
Table 3 – Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations
Specific Plan Land Use
Designation
Corresponding General Plan
Land Use Designation
Commercial Neighborhood (CN) CN-Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Retail (CR) CR-Commercial Retail
Commercial Tourist (CT) CT-Commercial Tourist
Business Park (BP) BP-Businesses Park
Industrial (Logistics (I-L) LI-Light Industrial
Residential (R) HHDR-Highest Density
Residential
Public Park/Open Space (PP/OS) OS-R-Open Space, Recreation Public Facility (PF) PF-Public Facilities/Institutional Page | 38
Figure 31: Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations
Amendments to allow proposed Industrial Logistic Uses on Project Site. The proposed industrial logistic uses require a GPA because only properties within the Mira Loma Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay or the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay permit logistic uses.
The applicant has submitted a GPA with their proposal to request an amendment to the General Plan to allow industrial logistic uses on the project site. The City Council initiated the GPA in 2021 as described above.
Instead of defining an area that allows for logistic uses like the Mira Loma Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay, the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay can be applied to the project site subject to compliance with requirements of the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay as presented in Table 4 below.
Page | 39
Table 4 – Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center
Overlay
Requirement Project Consistent
Development Agreement with the
City that provides for community
benefits that offset the loss of
potential manufacturing or
commercial uses that would
otherwise generate higher paying
jobs and tax base.
Yes. Development Agreement
Proposed.
Project exemplifies extraordinary
design quality consisting of a
campus-like setting that
enhances and beautifies the
streetscape and surrounding
areas.
Yes. As provided for in the
Landscape Development
Standards and Landscape
Design Guidelines sections of
The District at Jurupa Valley
Specific Plan.
Project provides for adequate
protection of residential
neighborhoods from truck traffic
and air pollution.
Yes. The Specific Plan requires a
750-foot buffer requirement from
residential uses, landscaped
screening requirements, street
improvements, defined truck
circulation routes, truck route
compliance and enforcement
measures in addition to
conditions of approval, and
mitigation measures. In addition,
air filtration systems and special
window requirements for new
residential development would be
required to mitigate air pollution.
The project is consistent with the
goals of the General Plan; and
Yes. The Project is consistent with
the General Plan goals as outlined
the attached Resolution.
One of the following zoning
classifications applies to the
project site:
a) S-P (Specific Plan);
b) M-M (Manufacturing -
Medium); or
Yes. The project site is zoned S-P.
Page | 40
Table 4 – Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center
Overlay
Requirement Project Consistent
c) M-H (Manufacturing -
Heavy).
The Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay would be applied to the 67.3 acre Industrial/Logistics (I-L) Land Use Area of the proposed Specific Plan as illustrated in Figure 31.
Amendments to create a new General Plan Overlay, the "Commercial Retail- Integrated Use” Overlay and establish the Commercial Retail- Integrated Use Overlay on Project Site. In order to allow Commercial Retail -Integrated uses in the Specific Plan area, a ne w Commercial Retail -Integrated Use General Plan Overlay needs to be created and established. The following new Overlay language would be added to General Plan Section LUE 5- Land Use Overlays:
Commercial Retail – Integrated Use Overlay (CR-IUO)
The Commercial Retail – Integrated Use Overlay (CR -IUO) may be applied to a Commercial Retail designated area where the City seeks to accommodate a retailer which combines its retail store with light manufacturing, assembly, warehouse, and/or distribution into a single location. These types of integrated retail buildings enable the business to operate efficiently with a centralized place of business to meet the ever -changing and competitive retail marketplace that caters to the traditional brick and mortar store and the on-line shopper while having their showroom, retail area, offices, light manufacturing, assembly and/or warehouse uses at the same location. This Overlay shall operate independently from all other General Plan Overlays, unless one of those Overlays is also applied to the same portion of a property.
Policies
The following policies apply within the Commercial Retail – Integrated Use Overlay.
LUE 5.74 Permitted Uses. Permit Commercial Retail – Integrated uses in the Commercial Retail land Use designation and the
Commercial Retail zoning district only.
LUE 5.75 Retail Showroom Area. A Commercial Retail-Integrated Use shall have a traditional “brick and mortar” retail showroom for display and sale of products to the public and which operates and has the appearance of a retail building. Each individual Commercial Retail-Integrated Use shall have a minimum of 10% of its total floor area occupied by a retail showroom.
Page | 41
LUE 5.76 Residential Buffering. Require Commercial Retail – Integrated uses adjacent to residential uses to provide measures to reduce the impacts of the Commercial Retail – Integrated use on residential uses. These measures shall include, but not be limited to, a minimum 500-foot distance buffer between any loading dock door and a residential
dwelling unit within a Residential zone/district. The buffer shall be measured from the truck dock door closest to the nearest dwelling unit. The buffer area can be used for automobile parking, infrastructure improvements, parks and open space.
All loading dock doors and truck courts shall be screened from any adjacent residential use by landscaping, berms, and/or walls. The site development permit for any Commercial Retail- Integrated Use shall include operational and design standards that ensure the protection of residential neighborhoods from truck traffic, noise, lighting, air pollution, and any other potential negative impacts.
LUE 5.77 Truck Circulation. A truck circulation plan shall be required as part of the site development permit review process for any Commercial Retail – Integrated use. The truck circulation plan shall include, but not be limited to, designated truck routes, signage, turning restrictions and other measures deemed necessary to limit truck movement away from residential land uses.
The Commercial Retail- Integrated Use Overlay (CR-IUO) would be applied to a
52.4-acre portion of the Commercial Retail Land Use Area of the Specific Plan designated CR -Integrated Use Overlay as illustrated in Figure 31.
This agenda item presents the third General Plan Amendment proposal of 2023. The City can approve a maximum of four amendments to a mandatory element of a General Plan during any calendar year. The City approved the first batch on May 4, 2023 and second batch on July 27, 2023.
Environmental Justice Element: The Environmental Justice Element (EJE) within the City’s General Plan seeks to minimize and equalize the effect of environmental hazards among all people regardless of race, ethnicity, or income level. The Element seeks to address environmental justice th rough a set of comprehensive objectives and policies which will be used by the City in planning for the physical development of the City. The project is consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the EJE including: screening and buffering of industrial land uses from nearby residential uses; designated truck routes and truck enforcement measures to reduced truck impacts from residential neighborhoods; mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts including separation/setbacks, landscaping, bar riers, use of electric -powered off-road equipment (e.g., yard trucks/hostlers) for daily warehouse and business operations, restrictions on truck idling, ventilation systems, air filters/cleaners and other measures.
Page | 42
The EJE requires that low -income and m inority populations have equal access and influence in the land use decision -making process through such methods as bilingual notices, posting bilingual notices at development sites, conducting informational meetings with interpreters, etc. On July 13, 2023, the City hosted an Environmental Justice (EJ) Informational Session for the proposed project. The Informational Session was held at the Eddie Dee Smith Senior/Community Center and started at 6:00 pm. Attendees consisted of staff, a Spanish translator, the project applicant, and approximately 30 members of the public. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the project; provide an overview of the environmental review and process; provide how the public can access the Specific Plan and Draft Environme ntal Impact Report; answer questions; and receive comments. Additionally, the applicant also made a brief presentation of the project.
The City mailed a 20-day bilingual notice of the information session to 1) property owners within 1,000 feet of the bo undaries of the project site, and 2) owners and occupants in the Belltown neighborhood. In addition, the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ) was notified. The EJ Meeting notice is provided as Attachment No. 10
Comments, questions, and concerns that were raised by members of the public during the Q&A portion of the meeting were as follows:
Truck routes and truck traffic
Roadway improvements to Hall Avenue
Possible future tenants in the project
Amount, size, and types of warehouse/distribution centers in the project Type of community benefits that would benefit the Rubidoux/Belltown area
Local hiring
Improvements to the Rubidoux Blvd on/off ramps at the 60 Freeway Street and bridge modifications
Potential church use in the project
Air quality impacts
Location of truck door docks
Recreational and open space use by the public
Staff and the applicant team provided answers to the questions and addressed concerns and comments.
Page | 43
Findings for Approval of a General Plan Amendment:
Per Section 9.30.40 of the JVMC Section (F) (2), a Planning Commission resolution recommending approval of a General Plan Amendment and a City Council resolution approving a General Plan Amendment shall include the following findings:
1. The proposed change does not involve a change in or conflict with: the City’s Vision; any General Planning Principle set forth in General Plan.
2. The proposed amendment would either contribute to the purposes of the General Plan or, at a minimum, would not be detrimental to them.
The subject site has a various General Plan Land Use Designation s associated with the existing Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan . The proposed amendment would change the Land Use Designations to Commercial Neighborhood, Commercial Retail, Commercial Tourist, Light Industrial, High est Density Residential, Public Facilities, and Open Space -Recreation to correspond with the proposed The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan Land Use Areas. The proposed General Plan Amendment would also apply the Agua Mansa Warehouse and Distribution Center Overlay to the 67.3 acre Industrial/Logistics (I-L) Land Use Area of the proposed Specific Plan . In addition, i n order to allow Commercial Retail-Integrated uses in the Specific Plan area, a new Commercial Retail - Integrated Use (CR-IUO) General Plan Overlay would be established in the General Plan Land Use Element. The new Overlay would be added to General Plan Section LUE 5- Land Use Overlay. The CR-IUO would be applied to a 52.4- acre portion of the Commercial Retail Land Use Area of the Specific Plan designated CR -Integrated Use Overlay.
These General Plan Amendments will ensure consistency between the General Plan and the proposed Specific Plan and with goals and policies within each applicable General Plan Land Use Designation applied to the Project site.
3. An amendment is required to expand basic employment job opportunities (jobs that contribute directly to th e city's economic base) and that would improve the ratio of jobs- to-workers in the city.
The amendment and the subsequent development of the Specific Plan would expand basic employment job opportunities and the ratio of jobs-to-workers in the City by providing jobs ranging from construction workers necessary for the development to the jobs necessary to operate the proposed commercial, hospitality, business park, and industrial land use s. This project would help promote jobs for people of all income levels, including low-income residents.
Page | 44
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38318
The Tentative Tract Map (TTM) subdivides the project site into the 38 parcels to accommodate proposed land uses, preliminary grading and utilities plan, street vacations, and backbone improvements associated with the proposed Specific Plan. The TTM complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for standards and process and is consistent with the proposed Specific Plan . The Engineering Department has reviewed the project for access, circulation, grading, and drainage. Staff is recommending the attached conditions which address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality.
Compliance with Government Code section 66300 - The Housing Crisis Act State law provides that a city shall not approve a housing development project that will require the demolition of one or more residential dwelling units unless the project will create at least as many residential dwelling units as will be demolished. The project requires the demolition of seven dwelling units, but the project will include the adoption of a specific plan and a tentative tract map that will allow for the construction of up to 1,192 residences and, therefore, complies with this requirement.
State law also provides that a city shall not approve a housing development project that will require the demolition of occupied or vacant protected units, unless all of the following apply:
1. The project will replace all existing or demolished protected units.
2. The housing development project will include at least as many residential dwelling units as the greatest number of residential dwelling units that existed on the project site within the last five years.
3. Any existing occupants will be allowed to occupy their units until six months before the start of construction activities with proper notice, subject to Government Code Section 7260.
4. Any existing occupants that are required to leave their units shall be allowed to return at their prior rental rate if the demolition does not proceed and the property is returned to the rental market.
5. The developer agrees to provide both of the following to the existing occupants of any protected units that are lower income households:
(i) Relocation benefits to the occupants of those affordable residential rental units, subject to Government Code Section 7260.
(ii) A right of first refusal for a comparable unit available in the new housing development affordable to the household at an affordable rent or an affordable housing cost.
A “protected unit” is defined to include residential dwelling units that are or were rented by lower or very low income households within the past five years.
Page | 45
There were 11 residential structures on the project site. Four of those residenti al structures were previously owner occupied and have been purchased and demolished by the developer. Four other residential structures are not a part of the Project, although the developer remains in communication with three of those owners. If the develo per is unable to successfully negotiate the purchase of these properties, they will remain in place. The remaining three residential structures are owner occupied, with portions of the properties being rented to tenants. The owners of these three properties have entered into real estate agreements to sell their properties to the developer. These three properties qualify as “protected units” under Government Code section 66300, as they are occupied by renters that qualify as either very low households or extremely low households.
The City has imposed a condition on the project requiring that the developer replace the three existing protected units that will be demolished if the project is approved. As noted above, the housing development project will include at least as many residential dwelling units as the greatest number of residential dwelling units that existed on the project site within the last five years. Within the last five years, the project site has been improved with 11 residential units, and these units will be replaced with up to 1,192 residential units.
The City has also imposed a condition that requires that any real estate contract the developer will be entering into (or has entered into) require that any existing occupants of protected units will be allowed to occupy their units until six months before the start of construction activities with proper notice pursuant to Government Code section 7620.
The condition also requires that any existing occupants of protected units that are required to leave their units shall be allowed to return at their prior rental rate if the demolition does not proceed and the property is returned to the rental market.
The condition further requires that the developer agree to provide both of the following to the existing occupants of any protected units that are lower income households: (1) relocation benefits pursuant to Government Code Section 7260, and (2) the right of first refusal for a comparable unit available in the new housing development affordable to the household at an affordable rent or an affordable housing cost. The developer has entered into a real estate contract for the rental properties that provides that the occupants will be relocated to three new properties that developer will be constru cting off the Project site, and the Developer will be paying for all moving and relocation costs pursuant to Government Code section 7260 et seq. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City has conditioned the project to require that Developer provide a right of first refusal for a comparable unit in the new housing development affordable to the household at an affordable rent or an affordable housing cost once the residential units within the Project site are constructed. For purposes of complying with this requirement, “comparable unit” means either of the following, as applicable: (i) A unit containing the same number of bedrooms if the single -family home contains three or fewer bedrooms; (ii) A unit containing three bedrooms if the single-family home contains four or more bedrooms. A comparable unit is not required to have the same or similar square footage or the same number of total rooms.
Page | 46
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The proposed Development Agreement (DA) provides the Owner vested rights to proceed with the development of the Project Site in accordance with the terms and conditions of the DA. By entering into the DA, the City is securing certain public benefits which enhance the public health, safety and welfare. The purposes of the DA are as follows:
Ensuring high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; Reducing uncertainty in the development approval process that might otherwise result in a waste of resources, discourage investment, and escalate the cost of development to the consumer;
Strengthening City’s comprehensive planning process to provide for the most efficient use of public and private resources by encouraging private participation in the comprehensive planning process;
Assuring owners of land that upon approval, they may procee d with their development projects in accordance with defined policies, rules, regulations, and conditions of approval;
Providing for the financing and/or construction of necessary public facilities and services;
Provide for: (a) employment growth anticipated to result from the Development of the Property, both during construction and use; (b) an increase in tax revenues anticipated to result from the Development of the Property; (c) a stimulant to economic growth in the community surrounding the Property; and (d) the achievement of the goals and directives of its General Plan; and Employment and increased revenue for City.
Term & Approvals. The term of the DA is for twenty (20) years. The benefit of the DA for the applicant is the protection of the approvals.
The DA allows for the approval period of the Project to be extended to twenty (20) years.
The GPA does not have approval periods. On ce it becomes adopted and effective, the GPA would not change until the City Council amends it again.
Community Benefits. Table 5 is a summary of several proposed community benefits that would be provided by the applicant to the City. The estimated total benefit amount, based on a 20 year projection (discounted at net present value), is $15,706,814.
Page | 47
Table 5 – PROPOSED COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Type of Community
Benefit
Purpose Amount of Payment
Facilities Benefit
Contribution – Section
5.6.1 For construction of public
facilities for City, including,
but not limited to, those public
facilities described on City’s
Capital Improvement Plan
$110 per multi-
family unit
$183 for each
single-family unit
Term of 50 years. Rate
will automatically
increase 2% per year.
Maintenance of
Infrastructure Benefit
Contribution - Section
5.6.2 For operation, maintenance
and repair of City
infrastructure required by
Project approvals, including,
but not limited to, flood and
storm protection services,
sidewalks, roads, road
medians, street lighting, traffic
signals and similar City
facilities
$37 per multi-
family unit
$61.60 per single-
family unit
$308 per acre for
properties
designated retail,
business park,
hotel
$123 per acre for
properties
designated Light
Industrial
Automatic annual rate
increase by CPI
(minimum 2% and
maximum of 6%)
Public Safety Benefit
Contribution – Section
5.6.3 To supplement police, fire,
emergency medical and other
public safety services for
Project in addition to services
currently provided
$206 per multi-
family unit
$343 per single-
family unit
$0.126 per SF of
properties
designated
Commercial Retail;
$.094 per SF for
properties
designated
Commercial Other
Page | 48
Table 5 – PROPOSED COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Type of Community
Benefit
Purpose Amount of Payment
$.084 per SF for
properties
designated
Business Park
$.044 per SF
properties
designated Light
Industrial
Automatic annual rate
increase by CPI
(minimum 2% and
maximum of 6%)
Transitional Living
Program – Section 5.6.5
To support housing services
and opportunities for
residents
$250,000 to be paid in
five installments of
$50,000
Arts, Culture and
Community Resources
Fund - Section 5.6.6
To entities serving City
through arts, culture or
community resources
programs
$125,000 (one-time
payment)
Community Room
Lease -Section 5.6.7
Dedicated space of not less
than 2,500 SF within the
commercial area of Project for
City’s exclusive use as
community room
To be leased to City at no
cost
Term of 20 years
Commercial
Rehabilitation Program
Contributions – Section
5.6.8 To support and retain local
businesses who may have to
compete with the larger
incoming tenants of Project.
City would provide grants to
small businesses for building
improvements such as HVAC,
roof repairs, or façade
improvements.
$500,000 (one-time
payment)
Page | 49
Table 5 – PROPOSED COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Type of Community
Benefit
Purpose Amount of Payment
Rubidoux Downtown
Master Plan – Section
5.6.9 Support City’s efforts to
develop Rubidoux Downtown
Master Plan
$250,000 (one-time
payment)
SR-60
Freeway/Rubidoux Bl.
Interchange--Project
Approval and
Environmental
Documentation Study
(PAED) – Section 5.6.10
To fund first step in design
and construction SR 60
Freeway/Rubidoux Boulevard
Interchange improvements.
City to utilize existing
$2,400,000 in available
funds plus additional
$1,400,000 to complete
PAED. City to complete
and submit PAED to
Caltrans.
Commercial Truck
Enforcement – Section
5.6.11 Commercial Truck
Enforcement
(Continued)
To ensure trucks servicing
non-residential properties
comply with City Truck
Ordinances
City to fund commercial
truck enforcement with
incoming Public Safety
Benefit Contribution
Owner to notify truck
companies & drivers they
must comply with Truck
Ordinances; be jointly
liable with trucking
companies & drivers for
Ordinance violations; and
be subject to
administrative citations &
other remedies
Owner consents to City’s
use of cameras & other
technologies to identify
trucks & other vehicles
originating from or
travelling to non-
residential properties in
violation of Truck
Ordinances
Administrative Fee –
Section 5.8
To compensate City for costs
incurred in
drafting/processing
Development Agreement
$50,000 (one-time
payment)
$10,000 annually until
project completion
Page | 50
Table 5 – PROPOSED COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Type of Community
Benefit
Purpose Amount of Payment
Transient Occupancy
Tax Sharing
Agreements – Section
7.3 To provide economic
assistance for qualifying
hotels to promote jobs,
expand City revenue, and
meet unmet demand for hotel
rooms
City to provide up to
$599,999 in Transient
Occupancy Tax Sharing
Funds for Qualified
Hotels:
Minimum 160
rooms
Minimum avg.
daily room rate of
$190 per night
(subject to annual
CPI increase)
Upper scale,
upscale, or upper
midscale hotel
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this Project, with the City acting as the Lead Agency. The EIR document includes a description of the proposed Project and evaluates the physical environmental effects that could result from Project implementation. The City determined that the scope of the EIR should cover the following subject areas:
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare Land Use and Planning
Air Quality Mineral Resources
Biological Resources Noise
Cultural Resources Population and Housing
Energy Public Services
Geology and Soils Recreation
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation and Traffic Page | 51
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems
Alternatives
The scope was determined through the City’s independent judgment, and in consideration of public comments received by the City in response to the EIR ’s Notice of Preparation (NOP).
All impacts, with the exception of Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emission, a nd Transportation, of the proposed Project can be mitigated to a level of less than significant with the implementation of the mitigation measures. The impacts which cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant are as follows:
1. Air Quality, Significant Direct and Cumulatively Considerable Impact:
The Project’s operational emissions of Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO ) exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional thresholds for operational ‐source emissions of NO x, ROG, and CO and would therefore contribute to the violation of an air quality standard and result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of an ozone precursor.
According to the City of Jurupa Valley CEQA Guidelines, the following two criteria used to determine if a project is in conflict with the applicable air quality plan Consistency Criterion No. 1 states that the project under consideration will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. Consistency Criterion No. 2 states that the project would significantly exceed the growth assumptions used to prepare the current South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan. Because the Project would exceed SCAQMD emissions thresholds, it conflicts with Consistency Criterion No. 1 and Criterion No. 2 of the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). No feasible mitigation measures exist that would reduce the Project’s Reactive Orga nic Gases (ROG), Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions to levels that are less than significant.
The Project will include the following types of mitigation measures:
Use of newer construction equipment (US EPA Tier 4).
Low VOC paints
Require Vehicles/Equipment to Turn Off When Not in Use. Develop a qualifying Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)/ Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan to reduce mobile emissions for all uses.
Page | 52
The installation of wood-burning and natural gas fireplaces shall be prohibited.
Electric Landscaping Equipment
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Transport Refrigeration Units (TRUs) entering the Project site be plug-in capable.
All outdoor cargo handling equipment (including yard trucks, hostlers, yard goats, pallet jacks, and forklifts) are zero emission/powered by electricity.
Preparation and implementation of a construction vehicle and equipment management plan
Trucks drivers to restrict idling to no more than 5 minutes once the vehicle is stopped.
Use of 2010 or better model year engines.
Although these measures will reduce impacts to the maximum extent feasible, impacts will remain significant and unavoidable for the reasons stated above.
2. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Generation, Significant Direct and Cumulatively Considerable Impact: Project related GHG emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD GHG emission significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr and would result in a cumulatively considerable impact to the environment. The Project incorporates all feasible mitigation measures that could be implemented to further reduce the Project’s GHG emissions below the 3,000 -MTCO2e threshold. There are no additional measures available that would further reduce emissions because the majority of the Project’s emissions come from mobile sources which are regulated by the State and not the City of Jurupa Valley.
The Project will include the following types of mitigation measures:
Install solar photovoltaic (PV) panels or other source of renewable electricity generation on-site
Divert a minimum of 75 percent of landfill waste Encourage use of energy-efficient trucks
Although these measures will reduce impacts to the maximum extent feasible, impacts will remain significant and unavoidable f or the reasons stated above.
3. Noise Significant Direct and Cumulatively Considerable Impact:
According to the City of Jurupa Valley CEQA Guidelines, a project may have a significant impact if traffic generated by the project would result in a noticeable increase in roadway noise in areas where exterior noise is already in excess of City standards. A noticeable increase in roadway noise would occur in traffic noise increased by 3 dBA or more. Feasible mitigation is not available to reduce traffic noise. Typically, feasible mitigation Page | 53
measures for off-site roadway noise impacts include repairing the roads with rubberized asphalt and developing sound wall s or attenuation barriers to minimize noise impacts. However, this mitigation can only be imposed on onsite roadways since the Applicant would not have authorization or control to make offsite improvements. Project -generated traffic volumes would meet the cumulative noise impact criteria for multiple roadway segments and mitigation to reduce the Project ’s mobile off-site noise is not feasible.
Thus, cumulative operational noise impacts from related projects, in conjunction with Project -specific noise impact s, would be cumulatively considerable and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
4. Transportation, Significant Direct and Cumulatively Considerable Impact: Under State law, the effectiveness of the roadway system is now evaluated a metric called “Vehicle Miles Traveled” (VMT), which measures how much actual auto travel (additional miles driven) a proposed project would create on California roads. If the proje ct adds excessive car travel onto the roadway system, the project may cause a significant transportation impact. The intent of the new law is to reduce the reliance on passenger vehicles by increasing opportunities for other modes of travel, such as mass transit, bicycles, and walking. In practice, reducing the amount of vehicle miles traveled would reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions emitted by vehicles. Because greenhouse gas emissions are a major contributor to climate change, the negative impa cts caused by climate change would be reduced. The proposed Project’s Regional Commercial uses results in a net increase Citywide VMT of 0.56 percent under baseline conditions and 0.43 percent under cumulative conditions. As such, regional retail land uses exceed the City threshold under baseline and cumulative scenarios. The Project would contribute to a cumulative impact and thus would be cumulatively considerable. Impacts are significant and unavoidable in this regard and are thus cumulatively considerab le. No feasible mitigation measures exist that would reduce the Project’s VMT to levels that are less than significant.
Even with implementation of the recommended Mitigation Measures, there will still be significant Project -specific impacts as noted above and as described in the EIR.
Therefore, these impacts are considered significant and unavoidable and the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations for these impacts will be required if the Project is approved.
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify and adopt the EIR with Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for this Project.
Public Review of the Draft EIR (DEIR). During the DEIR 45-day public review period (June 16, 2023 through July 31, 2023), the City received comment letters from the following agenc ies, departments, or individuals and has provided responses to those comments:
Page | 54
1. City of Riverside
2. Advocates for the Environment
3. Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney representing Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters These comments and City’s responses are included in in the Final EIR (Attachment No. 5).
NOTIFICATION PROCESS
The Planning Division mailed a detailed project information sheet with the required public hearing notices in both English and Spanish to (1) property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet of the boundaries of the project site, (2) property owners and occupants within the Belltown neighborhood, and (3) to the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ).
Notices were mailed at least 10-days prior to the public hearing date. The radius map of the notified area is provided as Attachment 13. Additionally, a legal advertisement was published in the Press Enterprise.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The applicant will cover the cost of processin g this application. No additional cost to the City is anticipated.
CONCLUSION
Specific Plans are a planning mechanism to ensure that projects develop in an organized and a cohesive manner. Specific Plans incorporate a framework for the development of land use, circulation, safety and infrastructure including drainage, sewer, and water facilities in accordance with a jurisdiction ’s General Plan. Specific Plans also set the guidelines for implementing projects within the specific plan area relating to architecture, urban design, and landscaping.
Since the approval of the Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan, the City of Jurupa Valley has grown as a community. The City is a gateway to the larger Inland Empire area and provides housing opportunities close to employment centers in the cities of Riverside, Ontario, and Fontana. The increase in population and the rise of commerce have created new demands for additional housing opportunities and the expansion of commercial and employment centers within the City. Internet retail sales and logistics require distribution facilities for the shipment of goods. As a result, the City has attracted substantial development interest and investment.
The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan aims to transform the project site into a vibrant destination center for the City and the region. The Specific Plan envisions the creation of a multiple use district that provides new residential, regional and lo cal commercial uses, hospitality, business park, and warehouse/logistics uses creating employment opportunities within proximity to existing and future housing and public open space areas.
The Specific Plan will also provide trail linkages and public open space areas that will provide transition between uses and connect the areas within the Specific Plan area and adjacent community. The Specific Plan guidelines and standards for architecture will Page | 55
reinforce the unique character and identify of the City of Jurupa Valley characterized by high quality architectural forms and materials and emphasize a Southern California lifestyle that maximizes the outdoor spaces. The diverse mix ture of land uses seeks to maximize an underutilized property that allows for flexibility in site planning and design to adapt to changing market trends.
Project Summary: Implementation of the Project will bring the following benefits to the local community and the City as a whole:
Activate & transform blighted, vacant site into vibrant destination center Unique opportunity site due to size, location, & development potential Warehouse makes other desired components possible
Generates capital needed to build large-scale infrastructure in & around site
Measures to mitigate impacts of warehousing operations & trucks on new & existing residential units
Transformational potential for significantly under-resourced Rubidoux community Significant private investment into area
Major street and utility improvements
Open space for area greatly underserved by parks and recreational opportunities
New housing opportunities & new residents to support local businesses
Thousands of new one-time and permanent jobs
New convenient dining & retail opportunities
Elimination of public nuisance and safety issues (e.g., illegal dumping, fires, homeless)
Investment in existing small businesses (grants) & funding to address homelessness
Meeting space for City use
Catalyst for improvements to Rubidoux Blvd/SR 60 Interchange Economic engine for essential City-wide services (e.g., street & drainage improvements, police & fire services)
Premier national and international retail tenants
One-time & on-going revenue streams for community benefit & public safety services (e.g., Impact Fees, CFDs, sales tax, property tax transient occupancy tax)
Supports City’s housing goals
Units needed to meet State’s RHNA requirements
Subject to Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to provide affordable housing
Page | 57
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2023-77, certifying an Environmental Impact Report, making Findings of Fact, Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
a. Exhibit A. Findings of Fact
b. Exhibit B. Statement of Overriding Considerations
c. Exhibit C. Mitigation Monitoring Program
2. Resolution No. 2023-78, approving Master Application (MA) No. 21269 (General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21010, Specific Plan (SP) No. 21001, and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38318)
a. Exhibit A. General Plan Land Use Map Amendment
b. Exhibit B. General Plan Land Use Element Amendment
c. Exhibit C. The District at Jurupa Valley Specific Plan d. Exhibit D. Conditions of Approval
3. Ordinance No. 2023-14, approving Development Agreement No. 21001 a. Exhibit A: Development Agreement
4. Draft Environmental Impact Report
a) Direct link:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/2844/The- District-DEIR-For-Public-Review_Revised
b) Appendices available on the City’s website page under Development Services/Planning/Environmental Reports at “MA21269 The District at Jurupa Valley”:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/Index/68
5. Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) Direct Link:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/3019/MA21269-The- District-FEIR-82823
6. Excerpt of March 22, 2023 Study Session Planning Commission Minutes
7. Summary of Responses to PC Study Session March 13, 2023
8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-18 (without attachments)
9. Excerpts from the August 23, 2023 Planning Commission deliberation
10. EJ Informational Session notice (July 13, 2023)
11. Proposed General Plan Amendment Exhibits
12. Tentative Tract Map No. 38318
13. 1,000 Foot Radius Map with Extended Areas
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Resolution Certifying an Environmental Impact Report,
Making Findings of Fact, Adopting a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and Adopting A Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program -1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPT ING
FINDINGS, A STATEME NT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATION MONI TORING
AND REPORTING PROGRA M FOR THE DISTRICT AT
JURUPA VALLEY PROJEC T TO ALLOW FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 1, 192 NEW RESIDENTIAL
UNITS; APPROXIMATELY 3 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF
COMMERCIAL AND INDUS TRIAL LAND USES
(INCLUDING WAREHOUSE AND LOG ISTIC USES) ; A
HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE AND HOSPITALITY AREA;
AND APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE ON AN APPRO XIMATELY 248.3-ACRE PROJECT
SITE GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SR-60 TO THE NORTH,
THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE EAST, 34TH STREET TO
THE SOUTH, AND RUBID OUX BOULEVARD TO THE
WEST
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Project. EM Ranch Owner LLC (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21001, the adoption of a Specific Plan (SP21001), a Development Agreement, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38318, (collectively, Master Application No. 21269 or MA No. 21269) to permit the construction of up to 1,192 new residential units; approximately 3 million square feet of commercial and industrial land uses (including warehouse and logistic uses); a hotel with conference and hospitality area; and approximately 11 acres of parks and open space on an approximately 248.3-acre project site generally bounded by SR-60 to the north, th e Santa Ana River to the east, 34th street to the south, and Rubidoux Boulevard to the west (the “Project”).
Section 2. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The proposed Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq . (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.
(b) Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the proposed Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for reviewing, considering, and potentially approving the proposed Project. (c) The City determined that an environmental impact report (EIR) would be required for the proposed Project and issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on April 12, 2022. -2-
The NOP was sent to the State Clearinghouse (SCH # 2022040044), responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties and posted on the City's website on March 31, 2022. The thirty (30)-day public review period ran from March 31, 2022 to April 29, 2022 and its purpose was to receive comments and input from interested p ublic agencies and private parties on issues to be addressed in the EIR for the proposed Project.
(d) In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(c)(1), a scoping meeting was held during the NOP review period, on April 20, 2022, to solicit additional suggestions on the scope of the Draft EIR. Attendees were provided an opportunity to identify verbally or in writing the issues they felt should be addressed in the Draft EIR; no verbal or written comments were received during the scoping meeting.
(e) The scope of the Draft EIR was determined based on the NOP, comments received in response to the NOP, and technical input from environmental consultants. (f) Thereafter, the City contracted for the independent preparation of a Draft EIR for the proposed Project, includ ing preparation and review, as applicable, of all necessary technical studies and reports in support of the Draft EIR. In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City analyzed the proposed Project's potential impacts on the environment, potential mitigation, and potential alternatives to the proposed Project. (g) Upon completion of the Draft EIR on June 16, 2023, the City initiated a public comment period by preparing and sending a Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft EIR to all interested per sons, agencies, and organizations; the NOA also was published in the Press Enterprise. The City also filed a Notice of Completion (NOC) with the State Office of Planning and Research. The Draft EIR was made available for a forty -five (45)-day public review period beginning June 16, 2023 and ending on July 31, 2023.
(h) Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the Jurupa Valley City Hall and two Jurupa Valley Public Library facilities (Glen Avon Library, and Louis Rubidoux Library). The Draft EIR was also made available for download via the City's website: http://www.jurupavalley.org. (i) On August 23, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21269 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and voted three in favor and two against to recommend approval of MA No. 21269 which included a recommendation that the City Council certify the environmental impact report, and adopt findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the Project. (j) On September 7, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21269 at which time all persons i nterested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. (k) In response to the Draft EIR, written comments were received from various agencies, individuals, and organizations. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sectio n 15088, -3-
the City prepared written responses to all comments that were timely received on the Draft EIR.
None of the comments presented any new significant environmental impacts or otherwise constituted significant new information requiring recirculation of the Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5.
(l) The Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR and all of its appendices, the comments and responses to comments on the Draft EIR, and clarifications/revisions to the Draft EIR. The Final EIR was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies at least 10 days prior to certification of the Final EIR, in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(a).
(m) Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving a p roject for which an EIR is required, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding:
1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or,
2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (n) These required written findings, and all supporting information, are set forth in Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. (o) CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 requires that if a project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Con siderations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. A discussion of the project benefits and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Exhibit “B” to this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
(p) Environmental impacts identified during scoping for the EIR as less than significant, and not requiring further review, are described in Section IV of Exhibit “A” to this Resolution. Environmental impacts determined in the EIR to be less than sign ificant and not requiring mitigation are described in Section V of Exhibit “A” to this Resolution. (q) Environmental impacts identified in the EIR that are found to be less than significant through the imposition of mitigation are described in Section VI of Exhibit “A” to this Resolution.
-4-
(r) Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures are described in Section VII of Exhibit “A” to this Resolution. (s) Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section VIII of Exhibit “A” of this Resolution. (t) CEQA Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “C” is herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, and is hereby adopted. (u) Prior to taking action on certifying the Final EIR, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, including the Final EIR, the written and oral comments on the Draft EIR and Final EIR, responses to comments, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony presented during the public hearings on the proposed Project. (v) Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley is the custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the Ci ty Clerk, City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California, 92509. (w) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Declare that the above Procedural Findings are true and correct, and hereby incorporates them herein by this reference.
(b) Find that agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Final EIR and the proposed Project. (c) Find and declare that the City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final EIR, the written and oral comments on the Draft EIR, staff reports and responses to comments incorporated into the Fin al EIR, and all testimony related to environmental issues regarding the proposed Project.
(d) Find and determine that the Final EIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential impacts of the proposed Project, and that those impacts have been mitigated or avoide d to the extent feasible for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached as Exhibit “ A” and incorporated herein by reference, with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein.
-5-
(e) Find and declare that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports, in comments on the Draft EIR, the responses to comments on the Draft EIR, and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony does not constitute new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under CEQA. None of the information presented has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the proposed Project or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement.
Section 4. Certification of Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(a) The City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR as being in compliance with CEQA, adopts the Findings pursuant to CEQA and the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibits “A” and “B” respectively, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit “ C.” The City Council determines that all of the findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearings before the City Council, and in the record of the proceedings. The City Council finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit “B” by itself, would individually justify proceeding with the proposed Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR or alleged in the record of proceedings. (b) The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Project each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit “ C,” and directs City staff to implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit “C.”
(c) The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21152.
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall c ertify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of September, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
-6-
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-77 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of September, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of September, 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
Exhibit A
Findings of Fact