Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, November 16, 2023

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 16, 2023
Study Session: 5:30 p.m.

Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

2. STUDY SESSION:

A. CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN AND PROPOSED SITE

IMPROVEMENTS
Requested Action: That the City Council receive an overview of and discuss the proposed Civic Center Master Plan, City Hall Site and Building Improvements and direct Staff to move forward with the planning and design phase. During the A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member o f the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

planning and design phase, staff will also present project funding recommendations.

B. PRESENTATION - CALIFORNIA VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND

PREVENTION GRANT - PRESENTED BY REACH OUT

3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

4. INVOCATION

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIV E COMMITTEE MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 6, 2023

Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 3 -

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RI VERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS – ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8, 2023

B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA

1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST MOSQUITO A ND VECTOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 2023

C. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 6, 2023

D. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION

COMMISSION SPECIAL E XECUTIVE COMMITTEE M EETING
OF NOVEMBER 8, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8, 2023

3. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST TRANSPORTA TION NOW
COALITION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 2023

4. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE TRANSIT AGENCY B OARD OF
DIRECTORS MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 2023

5. UPDATE ON THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION

REDUCTION REVIEW CO MMITTEE MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 16, 2023

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

A. DISCUSSION OF 2024 LOCAL SALES TAX INITIATIVE

Requested Action: That the City Council p rovide direction to the City Manager regarding whether to conduct initial research on the feasibility of placing a local transactions and use tax (Sales Tax) on the November 2024 General Election Ballot.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. NOVEMBER 2, 2023 REGULAR MEETING

Page - 4 -

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

B. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-15, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPAL OOSA SPRINGS)

AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN

C. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-16

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-16, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -002 (PUBLIC SAFETY,

APPALOOSA SPRINGS) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL

TAX THEREIN

D. AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THE ORGANIZED RETA IL THEFT

PREVENTION GRANT FROM THE BOARD OF STATE AND

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE

BUDGET ACT

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-94, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF

GRANT FUNDS FROM THE BOARD OF STATE COMMUNITY

CORRECTIONS ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT PREVENTION GRANT

Page - 5 -

PROGRAM AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET

ACCORDINGLY

E. APPROVAL OF TRACT MA P NO. 38257 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 7

LOCATED NORTH OF RAN CHO JURUPA DRIVE, WE ST OF BEACH

STREET, AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE, ACCEPTANCE OF

OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38257 and accept the dedication as follows:

a. Accept the real property described as an easement for public street and public utility purposes for Lot “O” (Ranch Jurupa Drive) and portion of Lot “P” (Beach Street).

b. Accept the real property de scribed as an easement for public purposes along with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles for Lot “A” (Banker Lane), Lot “B” (Crossbay Loop), and Lot “C” (Perlino Way), indicated as “private streets” and within Lots “D” through “N”, incl usive indicated as a “private road easement”

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38257.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off-site improvements and survey monumentation.

F. APPROVAL OF TRACT MA P NO. 38258 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 9

LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BEACH STREET AND RA NCHO JURUPA

DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTA NCE OF

IMPROVEMENT BONDS

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38258 and accept the dedication as follows:

a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes for Lot “B” northwest corner cutoff at intersection of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Persano Street.

b. Accept the offer of dedication as an easement for public utility, drainage and public service ingress and egress for emergency

Page - 6 -

vehicles within Lot “A” (New Forest Lane), indicated as p rivate street and portions of Lots 1 through 6 as shown on TM 38258

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38258.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

G. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE FROM PRECISION SURVEY SUPPLY, LLC FOR A LEICA RTC360 LASER SCANNER

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of a Leica RTC360 Laser Scanner Equipment in the amount of $109,354.01 for forensic photography.

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING ZONING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 23004 (ZCA23004) TO ADOPT PERMANENT
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SENATE BILL 9 (URBAN LOT

SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SENATE BILL 9) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND
66411.7(N) AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Requested Action: That the City C ouncil conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-17, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7 (SUBDIVISIONS), AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING SECTION S9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND

9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND

ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT

PARCEL MAPS AND QUALIFYING HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9 (2021), AND MAKING A

FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

Page - 7 -

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS

17. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

20. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B. EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION NEGOTIATIONS - UNREPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 with the City's designated representatives regarding the salaries, salary schedules, and compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of its unrepresented employees for the purpose of reviewing its position and instructing the City's designated representatives. Final action on these issues will take place i n open session. The City’s designated representatives are: City Manager Rod Butler; Assistant City Manager Michael Flad; and Human Resources Manager Tanya Bragg.

21. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION

22. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of December 7, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be m ade available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.A
STUDY SESSION: CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN AND PROPOSED

SITE IMPROVEMENTS

RECOMMENDATION
The City Council receive an overview of and discuss the proposed Civic Center Master Plan, City Hall Site and Building Improvements and direct Staf f to move forward with the planning and design phase. During the planning and design phase, staff will also present project funding recommendations.

BACKGROUND
The current City Hall site was originally occupied by a one-room schoolhouse built in 1911. The original school house was replaced in the mid 1930’s with a three room school and auditorium. On e of the original architectural features from the 1930’s new school were the internal fan-shaped windows above the doors . These distinctive windows and some original walls from the 1930’s remain in place today.

The original auditorium was used as a meeting place for resi dents, a polling place, Sunday school and for community dances and potlucks. The three-room school remained until the mid 1950’s when a new school on Hudson St. was built. The three room school was then sold and began its new use as a feed and grain store. In 1973 the feed store was sold to Sam Salem , who turned the feed store into a western style clothing store known as Sam’s Western Wear. Mr. Salem expanded the building and added the western theme façade which is so recognizable today.

ANALYSIS
During the past three years, the number of City employees has grown from 24 to over 90 employees. In order to accommodate these new employees , some staff have been relocated to the Jurupa Valley Operations Center and several cubicle style modular work spaces have been added to City Hall . While the addition of these work stations has helped, additional office space is needed and there remains no space for growth.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

In addition to the need for more offices, most of the City Hall building infrastructure has exceeded usefulness and needs extensive repair and replacement. Both the interior and exterior of the building are in need of maintenance , the exterior siding is significantly damaged by dry rot and roof repairs a re imminent. With the increase in the number of employees to the building comes the need for additional restrooms, meeting space and adequate break rooms . The recommended renovations also include American with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, plumbing, electrical, paint and carpet.

In order to add the additional space needed, the proposed project includes a new 6,000 square foot two story building addition. This proposed addition will be added to the South side of the existing building. An outdoor Civic Plaza is proposed to welcome residents and businesses, from the existing parking area, through a new entrance at the rear of the current City Hall. As proposed, this area will have the capacity to hold outdoor events.

Lastly, the proposed improvements include the construction of the remaining Cit y Hall parking lot, landscaping, curb and gutter and sidewalk. It is important to note that the historical look and feel of the building will remain unchanged. Architectural features of the existing façade will be carried onto the new addition.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

That the City Council receive an overview of and discuss the proposed Civic Center Master Plan and direct Staff to move forward with the p lanning and design phase. Staff will then return to Council at a future date for approval of the recommended planning and design consultant/architect and a Civic Center project funding plan.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
No fiscal impacts are associated with this discussion item.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Discuss and provide alternative direction to City Staff.

2. Continue the matter to receive additional information from Staff for Council discussion and consideration.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
November 2, 2023

1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR JOINT STUDY SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Laura Shultz, Chair
● Penny Newman, Chair Pro Tem
● Hakan Jackson, Planning Commissioner
● Arleen Pruitt, Planning Commissioner
● Yesenia Villagomez, Planning Commissioner
Mayor Chris Barajas called the joint Study Session to order at 5:32 p.m. Penny Newman, Planning Commission Chair Pro Tem and Hakan Jackson, Planning Commissioner were absent.

2. JOINT STUDY SESSION:

A. JOINT STUDY SESSION: PEDLEY TOWN CENTER PLAN AND

CITYWIDE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Staff Report presented by Jean Ward, Project Manager and Peter Vanderwal, Managing Principal with Sargent Town Planning. Ms. Ward provided an overview of the background and purpose of the study session. She reported that tonight’s presentation will cover the Draft P edley Town Center Plan, which includes the culmination of the community process and Council input, the im plementation actions and timeline which will require incremental actions over an extended period of time, and a presentation on economic planning and analysis for Jurupa Valley.

Mr. Vanderwal provided the Master Plan area and context for the future of the Pedley Town Center. He reported that Pedley is one of three town centers identified in the General Plan, including Rubidoux and Glen Avon. The goal is to combine these areas into a unified town center, while preserving Pedley’s unique quality of life.

David Sargent with Sargent Town Planning, outlined the Master Plan Implementation Strategy, which includes identifying capital investments and infrastructure funding sources, public and private part nerships, staffing resources for the Town Center implementation , and establishment of district maintenance resources.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

Joseph Minicozzi, with Urban3 gave a presentation on the City’s economic data and development patterns.

Following discussion, the City Council and Planning Commission receive d and filed a presentation on the Draft Pedley Town Center Plan and Citywide Economic Analysis and provided input and direction.

Mayor Chris Barajas called a short recess.

4. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Kermit R. Perry, 3P’s Christian Ministry.

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Michael Flad.

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Agenda.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
As November is National Senior Pet Month, two senior dogs, a 10-year old female Maltese named “Sally” and a 10 -year old female Chihuahua named “Pumpkin” were introduced to the Council. Anyone interested in giving th ese available pets a home is invited to contact the City’s Animal Control S ervices Department at https://www.rcdas.org.

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

-3-

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Leslie Altamirano thanked the community for coming together to celebrate Halloween and for hosting all the kid friendly events. She encouraged individuals or Veterans who are interested in participating in the annual Veteran’s Day Parade, to sign up at the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District’s website.

Council Member Armando Carmona acknowledged Olga Piedra , President of Pedley Elementary PTO, for her commitment to the community by hosting a fun and enjoyable trunk-or-treat event. He invited residents to sign up for a community clean -up event this Saturday at Downey Park from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Anyone interested in volunteering may contact him at City Hall.

Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva invited to the community to the annual Veteran’s Day Parade next Saturday, November 11. The celebration begins with a parade at 9:00 a.m. on Mission Boulevard, followed by a festival at Flabob Airport until 4:00 p.m.

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors meeting of October 26, 2023. He shared a brief video of his competition in the annual RTA Bus Roadeo obstacle course. Board Members are invited to participate in the event and this year, he won First Place.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of October 27, 2023.

3. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Southern California Association of Governments Transportation Committee meeting of November 2, 2023.

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

City Manager Rod Butler invited the community to come out to the Veteran’s Day Parade on Saturday, November 11. He noted there is still time to be a part of the parade. He reminded residents that as part of the Burrtec trash service, all Jurupa Valley residents receive two free b ulky-item collection services by Burrtec. Residents may call Burrtec Customer Service for further information at (951) 786-0639. He announced that City Hall will be closed on Friday, November 10 in observance of Veterans Day. City Hall will resume regular office hours on Monday, November 13, 2023.

-4-

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. OCTOBER 19, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , to approve the Minutes of the October 19, 2023 regular meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and r esolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,955,198.62

Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated September 28, and October 5, 13, and 29, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated September 29, 30 and October 13, 2023.

C. SUMMARY VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND

DRAINAGE PURPOSES, SOUTH OF UNION PLACIFIC RAILROAD
TRACKS AT 8884 JURUPA ROAD

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023 -85, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF

AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES,

INCLUDING PUBL IC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICES PURPOSES

LOCATED GENERALLY SOUTH OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
TRACKS AT 8884 JURUPA ROAD PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF

-5-

CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF DIVISION 9 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS

AND HIGHWAYS CODE

D. THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEM ENT FOR CONSULTING

SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KEVIN

RYAN FOR AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to the agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Kevin Ryan for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) administrative consulting and project management services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

E. APPROVAL OF FOURT H AMENDMENT TO AGREE MENT WITH

FIRSTCARBON SOLUTION S CORPORATION FOR TH E

PREPARATION OF AN EN VIRONMENTAL IMPACT R EPORT FOR
THE PROPOSED “RIO VI STA SPECIFIC PLAN” P ROJECT, (CASE NUMBER: MA16045), (APPLICANT: RICHLAND COMMUNITIES)
Requested Action: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with First Carbon Solutions Corporation for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed “Rio Vista Specific Plan ” project in an amount not to exceed $425,860, to be funded entirely by the applicant ’s advance deposit sufficient to cover the EIR administrative costs.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Consent Calendar.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSIDER CALLING A SPE CIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULT S OF THE ELECTION; A ND APPROVING

FORMATION AND LEVY O F SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FAC ILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-001
(APPALOOSA SPRINGS) GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF CLAY

STREET, EAST OF PEDLEY ROAD, AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE
AVENUE, TRACT NO. 37714

-6-

Paul Toor, Public Works Director, presented the staff report.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2023-86 and 2023- 87, entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-86 - A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPALOOSA

SPRINGS), TO ESTABLISH AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT

THEREFOR, TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

THEREIN, AND TO SUBMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO
THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-87 - A RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA,

CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE

QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS)

PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL
TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT; AND

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

At the request of the mayor, the City Clerk announced that two owners cast two ballots. All votes cast were in favor of the special tax.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-88, entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE

RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELEC TION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPALOOSA

SPRINGS) AND DIRECTING THE RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF

SPECIAL TAX LIEN

-7-

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to introduce Ordinance No. 2023-15, entitled:

ORDINANCE NO. 2023 -15 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS

THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPALOOSA

SPRINGS) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL
ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE E LECTION; AND

APPROVING FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y COMMUNITY FACILITI ES DISTRICT
NO. PS 2022 -002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS);

GENERALLY L OCATED WEST OF CLAY STREET, EAST OF
PEDLEY ROAD, AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE, TRACT NO.
37714

Paul Toor, Public Works Director, presented the staff report.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , to ad opt Resolution No s. 2023 -89 and 2023 -90, entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-89 - A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ,

CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -002 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS), TO ESTABLISH AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT THEREFORE, TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN, AND TO S UBMIT THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE

LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
THEREOF; AND

-8-

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUB MITTING TO THE

QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -002 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS) PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE

ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY

FACILITIES DISTRICT

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

At the request of the mayor, the City Clerk announced that two owners cast two ballots. All votes cast were in favor of the special tax.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-91, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL

ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS2022 -002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS)

AND DIRECTING THE RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX
LIEN

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to introduce Ordinance No. 2023-16, entitled:

ORDINANCE NO. 2023 -16 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS

CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -002
(PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY

OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-9-

C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 23244: THE FIRST ONE (1) YEAR EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP (TPM) NO. 37126 EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE TO OCTOBER 29, 2024, AND DETERMIN ING THAT NO FURTHER

CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15162; LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MISSION
BOULEV ARD AND CRESTMORE ROAD (APNS: 179-330-002, 003, 004, 005 & 006); (APPLICANT: NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION)

Roberto Gonzalez, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Gonzalez reported that the City Council approved the Rubidoux Gateway Entitlements in October 2020. One of the entitlements included a tentative parcel map, which was initially approved with an expiration date of 10/29/2023. An extension of the tentative parcel map is now required to provide more time to complete and record the final map. Mr. Gonzalez summarized the components of the project, which includes both commercial and residential buildings with a community center, pool and covered parking. Mr. Gonzales reported that all of the units are affordable and are being developed by the Northtown Housing Development Corporation, which is a 501(c) 3 affordable housing developer.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-92, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

V ALLEY, APPROVING THE FIRST ONE -YEAR EXTENSION OF
TIME OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37126 (TPM37126EOT1) TO EXTEND THE EXPIRATION DATE TO OCTOBER 29, 2024 FOR A
SCHEDULE “E” SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 7.13 GROSS

ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MISSION AND
SOUTH OF CRESTMORE (APNS: 179 -330-002, -003, -004, -005, AND - 006), AND DETERMINING NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW
PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-10-

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. APPROVAL OF A NEW CLASSICATION SERIES FOR ENGINEERING

TECHNICIAN I & II AND THE AMENDMENT OF ESTABLISHED
SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 2023-2024

Paul Toor, Director of Public Works, presented the staff report.

A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the creation of a new classification series for Engineering Technician I & II including the job description and salary range of $5,105.45 - $7,552.06; and adopt Resolution No. 2023-93, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A PPROVING THE AMENDED

CLASSIFICATION AND C OMPENSATION SALARY S CHEDULE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

17. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that a presentation be brought back for discussion that would addres s sidewalk vending in light of Senate Bill 946, which decriminalizes sidewalk vending in California and allows local authorities to adopt laws to protect public health, safety and welfare.

18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.

19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Leslie Altamirano thanked Dr. Veronica Contreras for organizing the “Walk With a Doc” event in celebration of National Latino Physician Day at Vernola Park.

She thanked Reach Out for hosting the annual Dia De Los Muertos Day , which was a wonderful community event. She encouraged residents to report illegal dumping on the myjurupavalley mobile application. She thanked the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District for hosting their annual Halloween Spooktacular. She thanked Opal Car Wash, L.A. Circus, and Jurupa Valley Adopt a Family for hos ting a fun Halloween event. She announced that the VFW hosts dinner every Friday and the Jurupa Mountains Discovery Center will host a fundraiser called “Dine with the Dinosaurs” this Saturday. She congratulated Pizza Plugg on their one-year anniversary.

-11-

Council Member Armando Carmona congratulated the Rodeo Café for being named the second favorite breakfast restaurant in the Inland Empire.

20. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Co uncil, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 8:37 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held November 16, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.B
-1-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS

CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS ) AUTHORIZING

THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City Council”), has previously adopted Resolution No. 2023-79 entitled “A Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS) and to Autho rize the Levy of a Special Tax within City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS)” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to conduct proceedings to form City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS) (the “CFD”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the “Act”) to finance certain services (the “Services”) including incidental expenses, to serve the CFD; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set November 2, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, as the date of a public hearing on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax within the CFD (the “Rate and Method”); and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published and mailed to all landowners proposed to be included in the CFD in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing , evidence was presented to the City Council on such matters before it, including a special report (the “Report”) describing the services necessary to adequately meet the needs of the CFD and the estimated costs of financ ing such Services as required by Section 53321.5 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing , all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the Rate and Method were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of Formation of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS), to Establish an Appropriations Limit therefor, to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax therein, and to Submit the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Levy of a Special Tax to the

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
Qualified Electors t hereof” (the “Resolution of Formation” ) which established the CFD and authorized the levy of a special tax within the CFD; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Qualified Electors of City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS ) Propositions Regarding the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Annual Levy of a Special Tax Within the Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution Call ing Election”) which called a special election of the qualified electors within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election, an election was held in which qualified electors of the CFD approved the establishment of an appropriations limit for the CFD and the levy of a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the CFD; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023 , the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Declaring the Results of a Special Election in the City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2022-001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS) and Directing the Recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien ” (the “Resolution Declaring Results of Election”) which certified the results of the November 2, 2023 election conducted by the City Clerk, which results showed that more than two -thirds of the votes cast in the CFD were in favor of the proposition to levy the Special Tax and the proposition to establish an appropriations limit for the CFD;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

2. Authorization of the Levy of a Special Tax . By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council authorizes the levy of the Special Tax in the CFD in accordance with the Rate and Method set forth in the Exhibit “B” to the Resolution of Formation, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated by reference herein.

3. Annual Rate Determination. The City Council is hereby further authorized to determine on or before August 10 each yea r, or such other date as is established by law or by the County Auditor-Controller of the County of Riverside, the specific Special Tax to be levied on each parcel of land in the CFD, except that special taxes to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rates set forth in the Rate and Method, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate.

4. Exempt Property. Except as provided in Section 53340.1 of the Act and except for properties that a local agency is a landowner of within the meaning of subdivision (f) of

-3-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
Section 53317 of the Act, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Act, properties of entities of the state, federal and local governments shall be exempt from the levy of the Special Tax.

Reference is hereby made to the Rate and Method for a description of other properties or entities that are expressly exempted from the levy of the Special Tax.

5. Use of Collections. All of the collections of the Special Tax shall be used only as provided by the Act and in the Resolution of Formation. The Special Tax shall be levied only so long as needed for the purposes as described in the Resolution of Formation.

6. Collection. The Special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem property taxe s; provided, however, that the Special Tax may be collected by direct billing by the City of the property owners in the CFD or in such other manner as may be provided by the City Council. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to any delinq uent Special T ax payments.

7. Authorization. The specific authorization for adoption of the Ordinance is Section 53340 of the Act.

8. Severability. If for any reason any portion of the Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inap plicable for any particular parcel within the CFD, by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the CFD shall not be affected.

9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 16th day of November, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -15 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of November, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of November, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 16th day of November, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

-5-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc

AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C
-1-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-16

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS

CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA

SPRINGS) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

THEREIN
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City Council”), has previously adopted Resolution No. 2023-80 entitled “A Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS) and to Autho rize the Levy of a Special Tax within City of Jurupa Valley Commun ity Facilities District No. PS 2022- 002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS)” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to conduct proceedings to form City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No.

PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS) (the “CFD”) pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the “Act”) to finance certain services (the “Services”) including incidental expenses, to serve the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set November 2, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, as the date of a public hearing on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax within the CFD (the “Rate and Method”); and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published and mailed to all landowners proposed to be included in the CFD in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing , evidence was presented to the City Council on such matters before it, including a special report (the “Report”) describing the services necessary to adequately meet the needs of the CFD and the estimated costs of financing such Services as required by Section 53321.5 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, at the public heari ng, all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the Rate and Method were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of Formation of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY,

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
APPALOOSA SPRINGS), to Establish an Appropriations Limit therefor, to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax therein, and to Submit the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Levy of a Special Tax to the Qualified Electors t hereof” (the “Resolution of Formati on”) which established the CFD and authorized the levy of a special tax within the CFD; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Qualified Electors of City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS ) Propositions Regarding the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Annual Levy of a Special Tax Within the Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution Calling Election”) which called a special election of the qualified electors within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election, an election was held in which qualified electors of the CFD approved the establishment of an appropriations limit for the CFD and the levy of a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the CFD; and WHEREAS, on November 2 , 2023 , the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Declaring the Results of a Special Election in the City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2022-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, APPALOOSA SPRINGS) and Directing the Recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien” (the “Resolution Declaring Results of Election”) which certified the results of the November 2, 2023 election conducted by the City Clerk, which results showed that more than two-thirds of the votes cast in the CFD were in favor of the proposition to levy the Special Tax and the proposition to establish an appropriations limit for the CFD;

NOW, THEREFOR E, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

3. Annual Rate Determination. The Cit y Council is hereby further authorized to determine on or before August 10 each year, or such other date as is established by law or by the County Auditor-Controller of the County of Riverside, the specific Special Tax to be levied on each parcel of land i n the CFD, except that special taxes to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rates set forth in the Rate and Method, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate.

-3-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc

4. Exempt Property. Except as provided in Section 53340.1 of the Act and except for properties that a local agency is a landowner of within the meaning of subdivision (f) of Section 53317 of the Act, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Act, properties of entities of the state, federal and local governments shall be exempt from the levy of the Special Tax.

Reference is hereby made to the Rate and Method for a description of other properties or entities that are expressly exempted from the levy of the Special Tax.

7. Authorization. The specific authorization for adoption of the Ordinance is Section 53340 of the Act.

8. Severability. If for any reason any portion of the Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable for any particular parcel within the CFD, by a court o f competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the CFD shall not be affected.

9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with law.

-4-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 16th day of November, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-5-
12774-0001\1942483v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023-16 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of November, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of November, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 16th day of November, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
DATE:

TO:

FROM:

STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 16, 2023

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.D

AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THE ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT

PREVENTION GRANT FROM THE BOARD OF STATE AND

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE

BUDGET ACT

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-94, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FROM

THE BOARD OF STATE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ORGANIZED RETAIL

THEFT PREVENTION GRANT PROGRAM AND AMMENDING THE FISCAL

YEAR BUDGET ACCORDINGLY

BACKGROUND
The State Budget Act of 2022 (Senate Bill 154, Chapter 43, Statutes of 2022) established the Organized Retail Theft Prevention (ORTP) Grant Program. The program made funding available to California city police departments, sheriff departments, and probation departments to support local law enforcement agencies in preventing and responding to organized retail theft, motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft, or cargo theft.

The program defines Organized Retail Theft as acting in concert with one or more persons to steal merchandise from one or more merchant's premises or online marketplace with the intent to sell, exchange, or return the merchandise for value, acting in concert with two or more persons to receive, purchase, or possess merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen, acting as the agent of another individual or group of individuals to steal merchandise from one or more merchant's premises or online marketplaces as part Page | 1

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

of a plan to commit theft, or recruiting, coordinating, organizing, supervising, directing, managing, or financing another to undertake acts of theft.

ANALYSIS

The City of Jurupa Valley worked with the Riverside County Sheriff Department's (RCSD) to develop the Organized Theft Prevention (OTP) Project - a comprehensive initiative to address the issues of organized motor vehicle and retail theft in the City of Jurupa Valley (City). Analysis of crime data and trends in the City showed significant motor vehicle and organized retail thefts over the past three years.

The analysis revealed roughly 340 vehicle thefts occurring each year, combined with over 200 reports of commercial burglaries annually. Overall, there have been 2,718 reported thefts in the last year alone, causing increasing concern for law enforcement and residents.

To address these needs and reduce the incidence of organized retail theft, the Project will:

• Establish Organized Theft Task Force Teams for Motor Vehicle and Retail crimes; and
• Utilize the Flock Cameras System and its Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) Technology effectively; and
• Implement the Small Business Retail Theft Prevention Program; and • Creating the Local Evaluation Plan and Report for BSCC.

On September 14, 2023, the City of Jurupa Valley was notified that the City's project was selected for funding under the ORPT grant program, for the amount of $2,219,710, to complete the proposed activities between October 1, 2023, and June 1, 2027, in partnership with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City will receive reimbursement, in the amount of $2,219,710, for the implementation of the activities described above. No local matching funds were required or proposed as part of this project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Elect not to adopt the resolution and not accept grant funding.

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.E
APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 38257 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 7

LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO JURU PA DRIVE, WEST OF BEACH

STREET, AND SOUTH OF LIMON ITE AVENUE , ACCEPTANCE OF

OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve Tract Map 38257 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for public street and public utility purposes for Lot “O” (Ranch Jurupa Drive) and portion of Lot “P” (Beach Street).
b. Accept the real property described as an easement for public purposes along with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles for Lot “A” (Banker Lane), Lot “B” ( Crossbay Loop), and Lot “C” (Perlin o Way), indicated as “private streets” and within Lots “D” through “N”, inclusive indicated as a “private road easement”

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38257.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and Ci ty Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

BACKGROUND
On November 1 2018 , the Jurupa Valley City Council approved Tentative Tract Map No.36822 for Paradise Knolls. A residential subdivision of 107.2 combined acres located on Limonite Avenue west of Downey Street and North of the Santa Ana River. The two approved tentative tract maps include Tentative Tract Map No. 36822 consisting of nine lots ranging in size from 2.28 acres to 22.87 acres and Tract Map No. 38257, which covers Lot “7” of Tentative Tract No. 36822.

Staff has reviewed Tract Map 38257 and finds that it is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved to form the Subdivision Agreements. This action approves the Tract Map, Subdivision Agreements, and accepts offers of dedication and the bonds related to the subdivision.

ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City Municipal Code, Title 7, Tract Maps require City Council action for approval, denial, or modifications. Per the Subdivision Map Act Section 66474.1, a legislative body shall not deny approval of a Tract Map if it was previously approved as a tentative tract map for the proposed subdivision and if it finds that the Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the previously approved tentative tract map. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Tract Map No. 38257 and accept the offers of dedication, relinquishment of access rights, the subdivision agreements, and bonds.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City will receive development fees and payments as part of the obligations defined in the Municipal Code.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.

2. Provide alternate direction to staff.

**********************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************

TRACT MAP NO. 38257IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OWNER'S STATEMENT
SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS

ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
RECORDER'S STATEMENT:NUMBERED LOTS:3 LETTERED LOTS:16 AREA: 7.944 ACRES (GROSS)7.909 ACRES (NET)(FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)

TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE

TAX BOND CERTIFICATE

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT

CITY COUNCIL'S STATEMENTSIGNATURE OMISSIONS
LOT 7 OFTR 36822
SHEET OF 3 SHEETSTRACT MAP NO. 38257IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIASURVEY NOTES:2 BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEETLIMONITE AVENUE

BEACH STREETEASEMENT NOTES
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

C.C.&R.'S PER INST. NO. ___________, RECORDED _______, 20__.

Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ Δ
Δ
ΔΔ
ΔΔ Δ
Δ

BEACH STREET

RANCHO JURUPA DRIVELIMONITE AVENUE
2 1
3 LOT D

LOT LLOT KLOT J

LOT FLOT GLOT E
LOT M

LOT NLOT I
LOT HΔ
Δ
1 Δ

CROSSBAY LOOP(PRIVATE STREET)

PERLINO WAY(PRIVATE STREET)

BANKER LANE(PRIVATE STREET)
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
Δ
ΔCROSSBAY LOOP(PRIVATE STREET)LOT BLOT BLOT C
LOT A
LOT P
LOT O
SHEET OF 3 SHEETSTRACT MAP NO. 38257IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA3 SURVEY NOTES:

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.F
APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 38258 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 9

LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BEACH STREET AND RA NCHO JURUPA

DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT
BONDS.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve Tract Map 38258 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes for Lot “B” northwest corner cutoff at intersection of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Persano Street.
b. Accept the offer of dedication as an easement for public utility, drainage and public service ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (New Forest Lane), indicated as private street and portions of Lots 1 through 6 as shown on TM 38258

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38258.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the suret y bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

BACKGROUND
On November 1 5 2018, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved TTM No. 36822 for Paradise Knolls. A residential subdivision of 107.2 combined acres located on Limonite Avenue west of Downey Street and North of the Santa Ana River. The two approved tentative tract maps include Tentative Tract Map No. 36822 consisting of nine lots ranging in size from 2.28 acres to 22.87 acres and Tract Map No. 38258, which covers Lot “9” of Tentative Tract No. 36822.

Staff has reviewed Tract Map 38258 and finds that it is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved to form the Subdivision Agreements. These actions approve the Tract Map, Subdivision Agreements, and accepts offers of dedication and the bonds related to the subdivision.

ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City Municipal Code Title 7, Tract Maps require City Council action for approval, denial, or modifications. Per the Subdivision Map Act Section 66474.1, a legislative body shall not deny approval of a Tract Map if it was previously approved a s a tentative tract map for the proposed subdivision and if it finds that the Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the previously approved tentative tract map. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Tract Map No. 38257 and accept the accept the offers of dedication, the subdivision agreements, and bonds.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City will receive development fees and payments as part of the obligations defined in the Municipal Code.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.

2. Provide alternate direction to staff.

**********************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************

TRACT MAP NO. 38258IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIAOWNER'S STATEMENTSHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETSRECORDER'S STATEMENT:NUMBERED LOTS:6LETTERED LOTS:2AREA: 2.619 ACRES (GROSS)2.616 ACRES (NET)(FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENTCITY COUNCIL'S STATEMENTSIGNATURE OMISSIONSTAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATETAX BOND CERTIFICATE ENGINEER'S STATEMENT LOT 9 OFTRACT 36822
SHEET OF 3 SHEETSTRACT MAP NO. 38258IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIABASIS OF BEARINGS:
2 BOUNDARY SHEETLIMONITE AVENUEDOWNEY STREET
SURVEY NOTES:

C.C.&R.'S PER INST. NO. ___________, RECORDED _______, 20__.

PERSANO STREET

BEACH STREET

RANCHO JURUPA DRIVE
123
456

NEW FOREST LANE
CL
CL
CL
CL
LOT A
6LOT B
SHEET OF 3 SHEETSTRACT MAP NO. 38258IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DETAIL "A"

PERSANO STREET

RANCHO JURUPA DRIVE
3 SURVEY NOTES:

EASEMENT LEGENDLIMONITE AVENUE

VENETIAN WAY

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.G

APPROVAL OF PURCHASE FROM PRECISION SURVEY SUPPLY,
LLC FOR A LEICA RTC360 LASER SCANNER

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the purchase of Leica RTC360 Laser Scanner Equipment in the amount of $109,354.01 for forensic photography.

BACKGROUND
The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department , Jurupa Valley Station initiated the research to purchase this system in March of 2022 and t he purchase was budgeted in fiscal year 2022-2023. In the fall of 2022, the procurement for this system was assigned to the County of Riverside’s procurement office. This purchase was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on April 18, 2023 with a four-year lease agreement for the total price of $115,163. The County procurement office did not move forward with the lease purchase. This procurement will be a cost savings with a direct purchase , which includes a four-year warranty and discounted price. The total purchase amount will be split with the City of Jurupa Valley at seventy percent (70%), the City of Eastvale at twenty percent (20%) and the City of Norco at ten percent (10%).

ANALYSIS
The Leica RTC360 3D reality capture solution has the capacity to capture environments in 3D and recreate accident scenes. This improves the quality of the visual evidence.

The scanning capabilities create an efficiency to assist law enforcement in clearing accident scenes by reducing the time needed for investigative measurements and road closures, which impacts traffic congestion and control.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

The cost sharing was determined by traffic volume and the number of such incidents within the City boundaries of Jurupa, Eastvale, and Norco. Due to the multiples freeways, interchanges, and boulevards, the City of Jurupa Valley had the highest rate of vehicle and pedestrian accidents with some resulting in fatalities.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Public Safety Funding

Name Price QTY Subtotal
Equipment Purchase Price $85,501.65 1 $ 85,501.65
Core Services CAD Software, Cyclone
Software, 4 years continuous Technical
Support, Animation Component – Point
Cloud Edition Module Updates and 4year
warranty
$35,835.00 1 $ 35,835.00
On Site Forensic Staff Training including
training documentation
$11,760.00 1 $ 11,760.00
Sub Total $127,706.65 $127,706.65
Law Enforcement Agency Discount $-25,541.33 $-25,541.33 Sales Tax on Equipment 7.75% $ 7,188.69 $ 7,188.69 TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE $109,354.01 $109,354.01

JOINT FUNDING CONTRIBUTIONS
City of Jurupa Valley 70% $ 76,547.81
City of Eastvale 20% $ 21,870.80
City of Norco 10% $10,953.40

ALTERNATIVES

1. Not approve the attached quote for purchase at this time.

Precision Survey Supply, LLC
8628 Utica Avenue #800
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 US
909-931-4040
[email protected]
www.precisionsurveysupply.com
Estimate

ADDRESS
Sgt. Javier Morando
Riverside County Sheriff's Office -
Jurupa Valley
7477 Mission Blvd.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
United States

SHIP TO
Sgt. Javier Morando
Riverside County Sheriff's Office -
Jurupa Valley
7477 Mission Blvd.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
United States
ESTIMATE # DATE
32468 10/12/2023

SALES REP
SE

ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
6012673
Leica RTC360 Laser Scanner Kit
838300 RTC360 Scan Head
817063 GVP730, Transport Container for RTC360
Laser Scanner and Accessories
799191 x4 GEB361 Lithium Ion Battery
799187 GKL341, Charger Prof 5000. Charges up
to 4 batteries, including power cable.
842065 x2 RTC360 Flash Drive - 256GB
636767 RTC360 Rain Cover
6013561 1 yr RTC360 Laser Scanner CCP Basic
1 85,501.65 85,501.65T
842066
GST80, Lightweight Tripod for RTC360 Laser
Scanner
1 2,550.00 2,550.00T
864515
Cyclone REGISTER 360 Permanent
1 5,550.00 5,550.00T
6012201
Cyclone REGISTER 360 CCP 4 years
Includes:
- Technical support by telephone and/or email
- Software module updates
1 3,480.00 3,480.00T
914470
Cyclone PUBLISHER Permanent
1 4,350.00 4,350.00T
6015918
CCP for Leica Cyclone - Publisher 4 years
Includes:
- Technical Support by Telephone and / or email
- Software module updates
1 2,730.00 2,730.00T
916318
IMS MAP 360 Pro Permanent Edition
Includes Core Service CAD
1 6,395.00 6,395.00T

ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
Includes Animation Component
Includes Point Cloud Edition Service
6015995
MAP360 Pro CCP - 4 years
Includes:
- Technical support by telephone and/or email
- Software module updates
1 5,390.00 5,390.00T
PSS32215
On-Site Forensic Training
Accepted By:

Signature:
4 days total at customer site. Forensic training
manuals provided to attendees.

Maximum class size of 8. Equipment, computers
and facilities provided by
customer. Travel and expenses of the trainer
included.
1 11,760.00 11,760.00
FREE Shipping Charges
Delivery with 14 days of PO
Does not include applicable taxes or shipping charges. Thank you! SUBTOTAL 127,706.65 DISCOUNT 20% -25,541.33
TAX (7.75%) 7,188.69
TOTAL $109,354.01
Accepted By Accepted Date

SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ITEM: 3.45
(ID #20102)
MEETING DATE:

FROM: SHERIFF-CORONER-PA: Tuesday, ApriM 8,2023
SUBJECT: SHERIFF-CORONER-PA-: Approve the Professional Services Agreement for a Leica RTC360 3D Laser Scanner Kit between the County of Riverside and Precision Survey Supply, LLC for Four Years through December 14, 2026 [All Districts], [Total Cost $115,163, Up to $11,516 in Additional Compensation, -100% Sheriffs Budget] RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the Board of Supervisors:

1. Approve the Professional Services Agreement for Leica Equipment Lease between the County of Riverside and Precision Sun/ey Supply LLC (Agreement) for an annual amount of $26,057 and a total aggregate amount of $115,163 for four years through March 27, 2027, and authorize the Chair of the Board to sign the Agreement on behalf of the County:

2. Authorize the Purchasing Agent, in accordance with Ordinance 459, based on the availability of funding and as approved as to form by County Counsel to: a) sign amendments that exercise the options of the Agreement, including modifications of the Scope of Service, that stay within the intent of the Agreement; and b) sign amendments to the compensation provisions that do not exceed 10% of the total cost of the Agreement.

ACTION:Policy
Donald Sharp, Undersherilr / 4/12/2023

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On motion of Supervisor Washington, seconded by Supervisor Spiegel and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the above matter is approved as recommended.

Ayes: Jeffries, Spiegel, Washington, Perez, and Gutierrez Nays: None Kimbe^ A. Rector

Absent: None Clerlwiube Boat
Date; April 18,2023 By:
xc; ^jj^iff ^' Deputy

Page 1 of 3 ends

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING ZONING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 23004 (ZCA23004) TO ADOPT PERMANENT
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SENATE BILL 9 (URBAN LOT

SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SENATE BILL 9) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND
66411.7(N) AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)

RECOMMENDATION
1) By motion, that the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-17, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7 (SUBDIVISIONS), AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING SECTIONS 9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND 9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE

JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS

RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT PARCEL MAPS AND QUALIFYING
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9
(2021), AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

BACKGROUND
Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) was signed by Governor Newsom on September 16, 2021 and became effective January 1, 2022. It requires that a local jurisdiction allow ministerial approval (no discretionary review) of two (2) units on parcels zoned for single -family dwellings per lot and/or the subdivision of a single -family zoned parcel into two equal

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

sized parcels (a 40 to 60 percent split of lot size is allowed). This type of subdivision (“urban lot split”) may result in each lot containing a duplex or two (2) detached residential units.

When the law became effective January 1, 2022 and up until January 20, 2022, the City operated under the State’s ordinance. However, on January 20, 2022, the City Council adopted an Interim Urgency Ordinance (IUO) that included regulations imposed under SB 9 as well as some objective development standards related to building height, affordability, and unit size. Under the advisement of legal counsel and t he State of California Attorney General, some of the objective development standards specific to Jurupa Valley have been removed from the proposed permanent ordinance.

The initial IUO was effective for a 45 -day period and was scheduled to expire on March 6, 2022. However, State law permitted two (2) further extensions: an initial extension of 10 months and 15 days, and a second extension of one year. The initial extension was adopted on February 17, 2022, which extended the IUO’s expiration date to January 20, 2023. The second extension was adopted at a City Council hearing on December 15, 2022, which extended the IUO’s expiration date to January 20, 2024. State law does not permit any further extensions of an urgency ordinance.

The Planning Commissi on conducted a public hearing on October 25, 2023 and , after receiving public testimony, voted 5 to 0 to adopt Resolution No. PC-2023-20 recommending City Council adoption of the proposed ordinance. Ten e -mails were received supporting the recommended action and comments were submitted that requested the City expand the applicability of SB 9 to the A-1 (Limited Agriculture) Zone.

ANALYSIS
Attached to this report is a letter sent by the State of California Office of the Attorney General (see Attachment 4). It advises all cities and counties with urgency ordinances relating to SB 9 that governmental agencies cannot adopt any regulations that impede or otherwise restrict the mandated provisions allowed for SB 9 developments. For further detailed guidance on SB 9 development, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) published a document addressing frequently asked questions (FAQ’s). A copy of the FAQ’s is included with this report as Attachment 5. The proposed permanent ordinance was drafted to achieve compliance with State law, using the relevant State documents as guiding principles.

Under State law, a local agency may be required to modify or eliminate objective development standards on a project-by-project basis if such standards would prevent an otherwise eligible lot from being split or prevent the construction of up to two units at least 800 square feet in size.

To ensure continued compliance with State law, the following provisions have been removed from the proposed perm anent ordinance or otherwise changed to avoid legal challenge:
1) Modified Provision: In addition to allowing SB 9 developments in the R-1 zone (One Family Dwellings), SB 9 developments will also be allowed in the following zones that are considered a “single-family residential” zone:
a. R-A (Residential Agriculture);
Page | 3

b. R-R (Rural Residential);
c. R-R-O (Rural Residential, Outdoor Advertising);
d. R-D (Regulated Development)
2) Modified Provision: The creation of “Flag Shaped” lots will be allowed; 3) Removed Provision: The 1,200 square-foot maximum SB 9 housing unit size has been removed, thus, there is no maximum unit size for SB 9 housing unit; 4) Removed Provision: The limitation to single-story units has been removed; 5) Removed Provision: The affordability requirements for new units have been removed.

Properties that are identified in the General Plan as being in a “very high fire hazard severity zone” and/or are located within a federally designated 100 -year floodplain are excluded from being able to utilize SB 9. The City has these areas scattered throughout the community. In additi on, SB 9 projects are not allowed in the following areas: a) earthquake study zones; b) prime agricultural lands; c) hazardous waste sites; d) coastal zones; e) historic districts and/or properties with historic resources. The City has identified two such protected areas on General Plan maps. A map illustrating the location of R -1, R -R, R -R-O, R -A and R -D zones in relation to “very high fire hazard severity zones” and the City’s federally designated 100 -year floodplain areas is included as Attachment 3 to this report for City Council reference.

In the recommended ordinance, there are definitions, development standards, and application procedures and processes for SB 9 Urban Lot Splits and Housing Developments. Some of recommended development standards for Urban Lot Splits are as follows:
 The two lots resulting from an urban lot split shall be approximately equal in size, and no smaller than 40 percent or larger than 60 percent of the lot area of the original parcel;
 Minimum lot width: 20 ft.;
 No lot resulting from an urban lot split shall have more than two residential units inclusive of any Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit;  Non-residential uses on the site are prohibited;
 A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot line s is required, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. For the R -1 and R-D zones, the street side setback shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet;  One off-street parking space is required for each unit created, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one -half mile walking distance of a high- quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an urban lot split shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot;  Ongoing compliance with all SB 9 requirements and restrictions shall be required;  The proposed urban lot split shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:

Page | 4

o Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income;
o Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power;
o Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application;
o Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application.

The following lists some of the recommended development standards for Housing Development projects:
 One off-street parking space is required for each unit, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one -half mile walking distance of a high-quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the project. Re quired parking for an urban lot split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot;  Non-public utility electrical elements such as wires, conduits, junction boxes, transformers, ballasts, and switch and panel boxes shall be concealed from view from adjacent public rights-of-way;
 All flashing, sheet metal vents, and pipe stacks shall be painted to match the adjacent roof or wall material;
 Pedestrian access to a public street or alley shall be provided with an exterior pedestrian pathway from the primary entrances of each unit to the adjoining sidewalk, street, or alley. Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity;
 One driveway per street frontage with a minimum of three feet wide landscape strip between the driveway and side lot line for the length of the driveway;  More than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of a Primary Dwelling shall not be demolished if the Primary Dwelling has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application;  A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines is required for all units, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure;  No ADU or JADU shall be allowed on parcels that use both the authority contained within the Government Code Section 65852.21 and the authority contained in Government Code Section 66411.7.
 A SB 9 Housing Development shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
o Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income;
o Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power;
Page | 5

o Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application;
o Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application;
 More than twenty-five percent (25%) of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the proposed SB 9 Housing Developm ent is located on a site that has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years;
 For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test must have been completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years.

It is important to note that other configurations of development may occur such as a duplex on each newly created lot resulting in 4 units.

Page | 6

Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay (ELPO): During a previous City Council hearing to consider the extension of the SB 9 IUO, a concern was expressed regarding impacts to properties within the ELPO and protection of the Jurupa Valley equestrian lifestyle. SB 9 does not exclude equestrian overlay ar eas. However, it is important to note that the majority of the City is zoned A -1 and is included within the ELPO of the General Plan.

The A-1 Zone is not available for SB 9 development. Exhibit A illustrates the A -1 zone and its prominence in the majority of the City. Exhibit B shows the location of the ELPO.

It should be noted that where the A-1 Zone occurs, the ELPO follows.

Page | 7

SB 9 Applications
It is important to note that during the last 10 months, there has only been one approval of an SB 9 application. There are currently two applications pending City review. However, since SB 9 is still considered very new, the trend could easily change so t he Community Development Department will closely monitor the level of interest in SB 9 applications.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the City Council public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on November 6, 2023. At the time of preparation of this report, no comments had been received.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The adoption of the SB 9 permanent ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to statutory exemp tions contained in Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n). In addition, the ordinance is exempt because it can be seen with certainty that it has no likelihood of causing a significant negative effect on the environment. The action is theref ore exempt from the application of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b) (3) (14 Cal.

Code Regs. § 15061(b) (3)).

Page | 9

Reviewed by:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft City Council Ordinance

2. Resolution No. PC-2023-20

3. Map of SB9 Applicability

4. Letter from Attorney General

5. FAQ’s from California Department of Housing and Community Development

ATTACHMENT 1 Senate Bill 9 Ordinance
-1-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

ORDINANCE NO. 2023-17

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7
(SUBDIVISIONS), AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING
SECTIONS 9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND 9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE

JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING

REGULATIONS RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT PARCEL

MAPS AND QUALIFYING HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9 (2021 ), AND MAKING A

FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) On September 16, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law, entitled the “California Home Act,” into law, which established a series of new regulations to allow for ministerial approval of urban lot splits and up to two residential units on parcels located in single -family residential zones as outlined in Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7. SB 9 took effect on January 1, 2022. (b) SB 9 requires cities to ministerially approve a parcel map for a n urban lot split and/or a proposed housing development containing a maximum of two residential units within a single-family residential zone, if the housing development or subdivision meets certain statutory criteria. SB 9 specifies that proposed projects and subdivisions cannot be proposed in prohibited locations under Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)(B) -(K), such as in an earthquake fault zone, lands under conservation easement, a federally designated flood plain, and high fire hazard severity zones as defined under state law.
(c) SB 9 further restricts the standards and regulations that local agencies may impose on qualifying housing developments or subdivisions. In addition, SB 9 permits a local agency to deny a proposed housing development or urban l ot split only if the agency makes a written finding based on preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety or the physical environment. (d) SB 9 specifically authorizes a city to establish objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards consistent with the bill’s provisions, and to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions. Such objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards may not have the effect of “physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet,” among certain other limitations.
-2-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

(e) At the January 20, 2022, regular City Council meeting, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022- 02 (Interim Ordinance) to establish interim regulations to implement SB 9 and include City - specific objective standards intended to limit the potential negative impacts resulting from density increases and incompatible land use patterns in single-family zones. This Interim Ordinance was effective for a 45-day period and was scheduled to expire on March 6, 2022. (f) Government Code Section 65858 allows two extensions of an in terim ordinance: an initial extension of 10 months and 15 days, and a second extension of one year. At the February 17, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022-03, which extended the Interim Ordinance’s expiration da te to January 20, 2023. At the December 12, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022- 25 extending the Interim Ordinance until January 20, 2024. (g) At the January 20, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to initiate amendments to the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to establish regulations related to SB 9 urban lot splits and housing developments (“Ordinance”) to be in effect prior to the expiration of the Interim Ordinance.
(h) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65854 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed hearing on the proposed Ordinance on October 25, 2023 at which time all persons interested in the proposed Ordinance had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65855 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, at the con clusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC -2023-22 providing a written recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Ordinance and specifying the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposed Ordinance to the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan.
(i) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65856 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Ordinance on November 16, 2023, at which time all persons interested in the Ordinance had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing. (j) The proposed Ordinance was proc essed and publically noticed in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, Planning Department Staff has determined that the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of -3-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

the CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n) of the California Government Code, becaus e an ordinance adopted to implement the provisions of Senate Bill 9 is not considered a project under CEQA. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA review.
(b) The City Council has reviewed Community Development Department’s determination of exemption , and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with Staff’s determination of exemption.

Section 3. Consistency with the General Plan . The proposed amendments are consistent with the objectives of the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan for the following reasons:
(a) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.1 provides: “Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single-family and multi-family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General Plan, specific plans, the Equestrian L ifestyle Protection Overlay, and community and town center plans land use maps.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the standards to allow for the development of two -unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones. (b) General Pla n Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.4 provides: “Housing Quality and Variety. Accommodate the development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are accessible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones.
(c) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.9 provides: “Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones.

Section 4. SB 9 Urban Lot Splits . Chapter 7.85 (Urban Lot Split Parcel Maps) of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby added to read as set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance, which is hereby incorporated as though set forth in full.

Section 5. Definitions. Chapter 9.10 (Definitions) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to add d efinitions of “Dwelling, primary ” as Section 9.10.455; “Dwelling Unit, Junior Accessory or JADU,” as Section 9.10.467; and “SB 9 Development Project” as Section 9.10.1125, each as set forth below, with all other definitions in Chapter 9.10 to remain the same:
“Sec. 9.10.455. - Dwelling, primary. The original dwelling on a property or, if the property is vacant, the larger of the two dwellings that are on the property.” “Sec. 9.10.467. - Dwelling unit, junior accessory or JADU. -4-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

Has the same meaning ascribed in California Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time.”
“Sec. 9.10.1125. - SB 9 Development Project.

An Urban Lot Split pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 or a SB 9 Housing Development proposed pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.21 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 9.300.” “Sec. 9.10.1238. - Urban lot split.

A parcel map subdivision of a single family residential parcel as permitted pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 that creates no more than two parcels of approximately equal lot area.” Section 6. SB 9 Housing Developments . Chapter 9.300 (Senate Bill 9 Housing Development Standards) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby added to read as set forth in Exhibit B to this Ordinance, which is hereby incorporated as though set forth in full.

Section 7. SB 9 development allowed in R-R Zone. Sec. 9.45.010 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 20 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in the R -R Zone to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.45.010 unchanged:
“(20) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 8. SB 9 development allowed in R-1 Zone. Sec. 9.55.010 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 11 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in R -1 Zone to read as set forth below, with the remainder of Sec. 9.55.010 unchanged:
“(11) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 9. SB 9 development allowed in R -D Zone. Sec. 9.210.020 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 18 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in R-D Zone to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.210.020 unchanged:
“(18) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 10. SB 9 development allowed in R-A Zone. Sec. 9.65.020 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 19 under subdivision “a” as a use permitted in R -A Zones to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.65.020 unchanged:
“(19) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 11. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would -5-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 12. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 13. Effective Date . This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.

PASSED, APPROVED AND AD OPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of December, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -17 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of November, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of December, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of December, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit A
CHAPTER 7.85 URBAN LOT SPLIT PARCEL MAPS
Sec. 7.85.010. Purpose.

The purpose of these standards is to establish procedures and standards for the urban lot split parcel maps in single -family residential zoning districts (R -R, R-R-O, R-1, R-A and R -D) pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 (SB 9). These standards supplement and are in addition to the standards for parcel maps in Title 7 and the zoning standards in Title 9, in particular Chapter 9.300.

Sec. 7.85.020. Applicability.

This Chapter shall be applicable to a proposed division of land subdividing an existing parcel in a single-family residential zoning district to create no more than two new parcels subject to the requirements set forth in this Chapter and Government Code Section 66411.7, herein referred to as an “urban lot split.”
Sec. 7.85.030. Ministerial Review.

A. An urban lot split shall be processed as a parcel map, but no discretionary review or public hearing shall be conducted if all required criteria have been met.

B. Applicants are required to submit an application, including any maps, records, or other documents required by the Community Development Director. Applicants must provide a sworn statement affirming eligibility with Government Code Section 66411.7, Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85, and all other applicable regulations.

C. The City may, at the applicant’s expense, conduct independent inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of any or all portions of the sworn statement.

Sec. 7.85.040. Denial.

The City may deny an application for an urban lot split if the Building Official ma kes both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence:

A. The proposal would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2); and
B. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

A-2

Sec. 7.85.050. General Requirements.

The following standards shall apply to all urban lot splits:

A. The parcel must be located within a single-family residential zone. For purpose of this Chapter, single-family residential zoning districts include: R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R- D and R-A.

B. An urban lot split shall not be permitted on a parcel located in:
(1) Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the State Department of Conservation.
(2) Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
(3) A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Governm ent Code Section 51178, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 4202. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
(4) A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or State Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. (5) A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standa rds Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(6) A special flood haz ard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100 -year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency A-3

Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless either of the following are met:
(1) the site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the City, or (2) the site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section

59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (7) A regulatory floodway as determi ned by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(8) Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat con servation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(9) Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
(10) Lands under conservation easement.
(11) A historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or a site that is designated or listed as a local landmark or historic property or district by the City.

C. The two lots resulting from an urban lot split shall be approximately equal in size, and no smaller than 40 percent or larger than 60 percent of the lot area of the original parcel.

D. The width of any lot resulting from an urban lot split shall not be less than 20 feet wide and access for flag lots shall not be less than 12 feet wide.

E. The proposed parcel map shall demonstrate the ability to access the public right-of- way in perpetuity. As necessary, easements shall be provided and maintained to allow for the provision of public services and facilities.

A-4

F. No lot resulting from an urban lot split shall have more than two residential units inclusive of any Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit.

G. Non-residential uses on the site are prohibited.

H. The short term rental for periods less than 30 days of any unit s on the site is prohibited.

I. Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split is prohibited.

J. The proposed urban lot split shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
(1) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(2) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(3) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application.
(4) Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application.

K. A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines is required, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

L. One off-street parking space is required for each unit created, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one-half mile walking distance of a high quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an urban lot split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot.

M. Prior to, or concurrent with the recordation of the final map, a property owner seeking approval of an urban lot split shall execute and record a covenant, supplied by the City and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, that contains the following provisions:
(1) Non-residential uses on the site shall be prohibited; (2) The short term rental for periods less than 30 days of any units on the site shall be prohibited;
A-5

(3) Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split shall be prohibited;
(4) Except as provided in Government Code Section 66411.7 for community land trusts and qualified nonprofit corporations, the owner of the property for which an urban lot split is proposed shall sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing units as their prin cipal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split;
(5) Ongoing compliance with all SB 9 requirements and restrictions shall be required;
(6) Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity; and (7) All required parking shall be maintained.

N. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 66411.7, all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, including the development standards in Chapter 9.300, shall apply, along with all applicable requirements of state law including the Subdivision Map Act.

Sec. 7.85.060. Exceptions.

The Community Development Director shall approve an exception to any of the standards specified in this Chapter upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units per lot or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area.

B-1

Exhibit B
CHAPTER 9.300 SENATE BILL 9 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Sec. 9.300.010. Applicability.

The purpose of these standards is to establish procedures and standards for SB 9 Housing Developments in single-family residential zoning districts (R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R-D, and R- A) pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.21. These standards supplement and are in addition to the zoning standards in Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 65852.21, all other regulations of the underlying zone of a property shall apply, along with all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municip al Code. If a conflict occurs between this Chapter and other provisions contained within the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, this Chapter shall govern.

Sec. 9.300.020. Ministerial Review.

A. Proposed SB 9 Housing Developments shall be permitted by right sub ject to ministerial review, with no hearing, by the Community Development Director or his or her designee to determine whether the criteria for approval have been met.

C. The City may, at the applicant’s expense, conduct independent inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of any or all portions of the sworn statement.

Sec. 9.300.030. Objective Standards.

All SB 9 Housing Developments shall comply with the following standards:

A. The parcel must be located within a single-family residential zone. For purpose of this Chapter, single -family residential zoning districts include: R -R, R-R-O, R-1, R- D, and R-A.

B. A SB 9 Housing Development shall not be permitted on a parcel located in:
(1) Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the State Department of Conservation.
(2) Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).

B-2

(3) A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, or within a hig h or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 4202. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
(4) A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or State Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. (5) A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Sect ion 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(6) A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100 -year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless either of the following are met:
(1) the site has been subject to a Let ter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the City, or (2) the site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section

Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(9) Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Prot ection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
(10) Lands under conservation easement.
(11) A historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or a site that is designated or listed as a local landmark or historic property or district by the City.

C. Non-residential uses on the site are prohibited.

D. Short term rentals for periods less than 30 days of any units on the site shall be prohibited.

E. One off-street parking space is required for each unit, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one-half mile walking distance of a high quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car sha re vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an urban lot split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot.

F. Non-public utility electrical elements such as wires, conduits, junction boxes, transformers, ballasts, and switch and panel boxes shall be concealed from view from adjacent public rights-of-way.

G. All flashing, sheet metal vents, and pipe stacks shall be painted to match the adjacent roof or wall material.

H. Pedestrian access to a pub lic street or alley shall be provided with an exterior pedestrian pathway from the primary entrances of each unit to the adjoining sidewalk, street, or alley. Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity.

I. One driveway per street frontage with a minimum of three feet wide landscape strip between the driveway and side lot line for the length of the driveway.

B-4

J. More than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of a Primary Dwelling shall not be demolished if the Primary Dwellin g has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.

K. A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines is required for all units, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

L. No ADU or JADU shall be allowed on parcels that use both the authority contained within the Government Co de Section 658 52.21 and the authori ty contained in Government Code Section 66411.7.

M. A SB 9 Housing Development shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
(1) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(2) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(3) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.
(4) Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.
(5) More than twenty -five percent (25%) of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the proposed SB 9 Housing Development is located on a site that has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

N. For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test must have been completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years.

O. An urban lot split processed in accordance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 shall comply with SB 9 and the standards set forth in this Chapter.

P. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 65852.21, all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, including Titles 7 (Subdivisions), 8 (Buildings and Construction) and 9 (Planning and Zoning), shall apply, along with all objective requirements of other applicable state law.

B-5

Sec. 9.300.040 Exceptions.

The Community Development Director shall approve an exce ption to any of the standards specified in this Chapter upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units per lot or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area.

Sec. 9.300.050. Denial of SB 9 Housing Development Application.

The Building Official may deny an application for an SB 9 Housing Development upon making both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence:

A. The proposal would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2); and,
B. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission Resolution PC-2023-22

Page 1 of 16 ends

PC-2023-22

RESOLUTION PC-2023-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 23004 (ZCA23004) TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISH PERMANENT REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SENATE BILL 9 (URBAN LOT SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9); AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND 66411.7(N) AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Project and Findings. (a) On September 16, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law, entitled the “California Home Act,” into law, which established a series of new regulations to allow for ministerial approval of urban lot splits and up to two residential units on parcels located in single-family residential zones as outlined in Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7. SB 9 took effect on January 1, 2022. (b) SB 9 requires cities to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split and/or a proposed housing development containing a maximum of two residential units within a single-family residential zone, if the housing development or subdivision meets certain statutory criteria. SB 9 specifies that proposed projects and subdivisions cannot be proposed in prohibited locations under Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)(B)-(K), such as in an earthquake fault zone, lands under conservation easement, a federally designated flood plain, and high fire hazard severity zones as defined under state law. (c) SB 9 further restricts the standards and regulations that local agencies may impose on qualifying housing developments or subdivisions. In addition, SB 9 permits a local agency to deny a proposed housing development or urban lot split only if the agency makes a written finding based on preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety or the physical environment. (d) SB 9 specifically authorizes a city to establish objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards consistent with the bill’s provisions, and to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions. Such objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards may not have the effect of “physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet,” among certain other limitations.

Page 2 of 5 ends

(e) At the January 20, 2022, regular City Council meeting, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022- 02 (Interim Ordinance) to establish interim regulations to implement SB 9 and include City- specific objective standards intended to limit the potential negative impacts resulting from density increases and incompatible land use patterns in single-family zones. This Interim Ordinance was effective for a 45-day period and was scheduled to expire on March 6, 2022. The Interim Ordinance was extended twice and is set to expire on January 20, 2024. (f) At the January 20, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to initiate amendments to the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to establish regulations related to SB 9 urban lot splits and housing developments (“Ordinance”) to be in effect prior to the expiration of the Interim Ordinance. (a) Section 9.285.030.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance that propose to regulate the use of structures or buildings, and that the amendment must be processed pursuant to Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance will regulate the use of housing development projects by requiring that a certain percentage of the units be affordable. (b) Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation. A copy of the recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council. If the Planning Commission does not reach a decision due to a tie vote, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and the failure to reach a decision shall be deemed a recommendation against the proposed amendment. (c) Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission. Section 2. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On October 25, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing.

Page 3 of 5 ends

(c) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley make the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project: (a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n) of the California Government Code, because an ordinance adopted to implement the provisions of Senate Bill 9 is not considered a project under CEQA. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA review. The proposed ordinance is also exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed ordinance does not authorize the construction of any housing, but rather imposes requirements on any housing project that is approved. As such, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Consistency with General Plan. The adoption of ordinance conforms with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan. The Ordinance implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element: (a) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.1 provides: “Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single-family and multi-family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General Plan, specific plans, the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay, and community and town center plans land use maps.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones. (b) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.4 provides: “Housing Quality and Variety. Accommodate the development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are accessible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones. (c) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.9 provides: “Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones. Section 5. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley:

Page 4 of 5 ends

(a) Adopt an ordinance establishing permanent regulations pertaining to Senate Bill 9 (urban lot splits and housing units built in accordance with Senate Bill 9) making findings pursuant to CEQA. Section 6. Certification. The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 23rd day of October, 2023. ______________________________ Laura Schultz Chair of Jurupa Valley Planning Commission ATTEST: _______________________________ Joe Perez Community Development Director/Secretary to the Planning Commission

Page 5 of 5 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ) I, Joe Perez, Community Development Director of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-22 was duly adopted and passed at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 25th day of October, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: NOES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: ABSENT: COMMISSION MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSION MEMBERS: ___________________________ JOE PEREZ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ATTACHMENT 3 (Map of SB 9 Applicability)

ATTACHMENT 4 (Letter from Attorney General California)

ATTACHMENT 5 FAQ’S Dept. of Housing and Community Development

Jurupa Valley City CouncilNovember 16, 2023

Jurupa Valley City Council
November 16, 2023