Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, December 7, 2023

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, December 7, 2023
Closed Session: 6:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

2. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS . The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the sale of a portion of the City owned Parcel 44 as shown by Map on file in book 25, pages 66 and 67 of Record s of Survey, Riverside County, California A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member o f the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

(0.28Acres) generally located at Golden West Avenue, east of Avenue Juan Bautista and north of Limonite Avenue to Rubidoux Community Services District to relocate the existing booster station across the street. The negotiating parties are the City of Jurupa Valley and Rubidoux Community Services District. Negotiators for the City are Rod Butler and Paul Toor. Under negotiation is the price and terms of payment for the purchase.

3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION

4. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

5. INVOCATION

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

8. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
B. QUARTERLY UPDATE – HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY
C. QUARTERLY UPDATE – JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE

9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

Page - 3 -

10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

11. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE INTERA GENCY COORDINATING C OUNCIL
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTER N RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIV E COMMITTEE MEETING OF
DECEMBER 4, 2023

B. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. UPDATE ON THE REGION AL CONSERVATION AUTH ORITY
MEETING OF DECEMBER 4, 2023

C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE METROL INK / SOUTHERN CALIF ORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHOR ITY MEETING OF NOVEM BER 1 7,
2023

3. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMITTEE – WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PRO GRAMS
AND PROJECTS COMMITT EE MEETING OF NOVEMB ER 27,
2023

Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 4 -

4. UPDATE ON THE SOUTHE RN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS ANNUAL E CONOMIC SUMMIT OF
DECEMBER 7, 2023

12. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. NOVEMBER 16, 2023 REGULAR MEETING

14. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,400,775.37

Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated October 26, and November 2, 8, and 16, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated October 27, 31 and November 10, 2023.

C. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-17
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-17, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7 (SUBDIVISIONS), AME NDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING SECTIONS 9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND

9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND

ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT

PARCEL MAPS AND QUALIFYING HO USING DEVELOPMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9 (2021), AND MAKING A

FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

Page - 5 -

D. APPROVAL OF CITY HOLIDAY SCHEDULE

Requested Action: That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2023 -95, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY
OFFICES SHALL BE CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024

E. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO MISSION BLVD. (9880 MISSION, LLC, APN 170-240-030)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and utility purposes, including public services purposes over, upon, across, and within the a rea as described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B of DED22-002.

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-002.

F. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO 3742 RIVERVIEW DR. (TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT CHARLES SCOTT, SR. REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, APN 170-070-007)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and utility purposes, including public services purposes over, upon, across, and within the area as described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B of DED23-002.

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-002.

G. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

CALIFORNIA WOOD RECYCLING, INC DBA AGROMIN FOR
SENATE BILL 1383 PROCUREMENT

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and California Wood Recycling, Inc. DBA Agromin for Senate Bill 1383 procurement and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the f orm and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

Page - 6 -

H. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF FY 2022-23 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONE K OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO . 89 -1-C AND PLACEMENT ON THE SECOND

INSTALLMENT OF THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-96, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF FY 202 2-23 DELINQUENT ASSE SSMENTS WITHIN

ZONE K OF THE CITY O F JURUPA VALLEY LAND SCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED OF

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, O N THE PROPERTY TAX R OLL FOR FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024

I. APPROVAL TO PURCHASE FORD ESCAPE HYBRID

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of a Ford Escape Hybrid vehicle for $37,022.23, including taxes and fees.

J. APPROVAL OF THE FIRS T AMENDMENT TO AGREE MENT WITH

RRM DESIGN FOR THE P REPARATION OF PERMIT -READY

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT PLANS
Requested Action: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with RRM Desi gn Group for the preparation of permit ready accessory dwelling unit (PRADU) plans.

K. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
STORM WATER INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC.

FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CERTIFIED FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM

TRASH TREATMENT CONTROL DEVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc. (“SWIMS”), for an amount not to exceed $112,785.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

15. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

Page - 7 -

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
CHANGING THE ZONE (CZ 23007) OF APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES

OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD
BETWEEN CAMINO REAL AND SOTO AVENUE (APNS: 174 -160-003, 174-160-010, 174 -180-021, AND 174 -150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A -1) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C -1/C-P) AND

DETERMINE THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS

REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT
Requested Action: That the City Co uncil conduct a public hearing, receive any public comments, and conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023- 18, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
OFFICIAL ZONI NG MAP CHANGING THE ZONE (CZ 23007) OF
APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES OR REAL PROPERTY LOCATED

NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD BETWEEN CAMINO REAL AND
SOTO AVENUE (APNS: 174-160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, AND 174- 150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A -1) TO GENERAL
COMMERCIAL (C -1/C-P) AND DETERMINE THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 17132:
"RUBIDOUX CO MMERCE PARK" – 1.18 MILLION SQUARE -FOOT
INDUSTRIAL PARK WITH 5 BUILDINGS; LOCATED EASTERLY OF

MONTANA A VENUE, WESTERLY OF WEST RIVERSI DE CANAL,
SOUTHERLY OF 25 TH STREET, NORTHERLY O F 28 TH STREET, AND

TWO PARCELS LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE WES T RIVERSIDE
CANAL AND NORTHWEST OF A V ALON STREET AND EAST OF 28 TH STREET; (APPLICANT: PROFICIENCY CAPITAL, LLC)
Requested Action: That the City Council continue this item to the December 21, 2023 meeting to allow additional time to evaluate the project.

Page - 8 -

17. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. REVIEW AND AWARD OF 2023 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANTS

Requested Action: That the City Council review the Community Service Grant (CSG) Committee recommendations for the 2023 CSG program and award funding to the first 12 applicants as indicated on the chart attached to the staff report in the amount of $52,000.

18. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

19. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

20. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

21. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of December 21, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be m ade available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
November 16, 2023

1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the Study Session to order at 5:32 p.m.

2. STUDY SESSION:

A. CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN AND PROPOSED SITE

IMPROVEMENTS
Staff Report presented by Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager. Mr. Flad gave a presentation on the proposed Civic Center Master Plan. He outlined the history of the existing building, noting that the current building is old and lacks functionality.

He discussed the current deficiencies with the existing building, which includes a lack of space, outdated infrastructure and amenities. He introduced Baxter Miller from Baxter Miller Architects, who gave a presentation on the conceptual Civic Center Master Plan.

By consensus, the City Council received an overview of and discuss ed the proposed Civic Center Master Plan, City Hall Site and Building Improvements and direct ed Staff to move forward with the planning and design phase.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
B. PRESENTATION - CALIFORNIA VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND

PREVENTION GRANT - PRESENTED BY REACH OUT
Diana Fox, Executive Director, Reach Out, gave an update on the Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant. Ms. Fox announced that the grant funding is available because of the City’s support of Healthy Jurupa Valley and Reach Out.

Ms. Fox reported that the amount of the award over three years is $5.8 million and will provide an opportunity for transformation al strategies that will benefit the entire community.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

City Manager Rod Butler provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.

Following the presentation, t he City Council provided feedback regarding the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant.

3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular Council meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.

4. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Alejandro Rios, Iglesia Cristiana Bautista Nueva Esperanza.

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Mayor Chris Barajas.

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Agenda.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona thanked everyone who was involved in last week’s Veterans Day Parade. He was fortunate to ride next to some Veterans and it was great to be a part of this patriotic event. He reported on his attendance at the California Economic Summit, produced by California Forward, where he took the opportunity to speak to state leadership about the rural aspects of Jurupa Valley and his efforts to preserve the equestrian lifestyle. He discussed his meeting with Senator Scott Wiener and his work with other state legislators, including Senator Portantino on an exemption for equestrian districts from state housing mandates. This will be part of a broader conversation in how the City can protect the equine and equestrian overlays that are being threatened by these mandates.

-3-

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee meeting of November 6, 2023.

2. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments – Administration & Finance Committee meeting of November 8, 2023.

B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA

1. Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva announced that he was unable to attend the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control district meeting of November 16, 2023, due to a scheduling conflict.

C. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. Council Member Leslie Altamirano gave an update on the Western Riverside County Regional Cons ervation Authority meeting of November 6, 2023.

D. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Executive Committee meeting of November 8, 2023.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson announced that the N orthwest Transportation Now Coalition meeting of November 9, 202 3 was canceled.

3. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors meeting of November 16, 2023.

4. Council Member Brian Berkson announced that he was unable to attend today’s Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting due to a scheduling conflict.

-4-

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

A. DISCUSSION OF 2024 LOCAL SALES TAX INITIATIVE

Staff Report presented by Rod Butler, City Manager. Mr. Butler presented information on the feasibility of placing a local sales tax on the November 2024 General Election Ballot.

Following discussion, the City Council provided feedback on a potential local sales tax on the November 2024 General Election Ballot.

Mr. Butler announced that the annual Tree Lighting event will be held Friday, December 1, 2023 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at City Hall. The event will feature a visit from Santa Claus, entertainment and holiday refreshments. He announced road closures starting tomorrow night from 8:00 p.m. through Monday at 5:00 p.m. at Pedley Road from 54 th Street to Galena and the Jurupa Road/Pedley Road intersection due to work on the Jurupa Grade Separation project. He announced that City Hall will be closed on Thursday, November 23 and Friday, November 24 for the Thanksgiving holiday. City Hall will resume regular office hours on Monday, November 27, 2023.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. NOVEMBER 2, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Minutes of the November 2, 2023 regular meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordina nce has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

-5-

B. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-15, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -001 (APPALOOSA SPRINGS)

AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN

C. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-16

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-16, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -002 (PUBLIC SAFETY,

APPALOOSA SPRINGS) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL

TAX THEREIN

D. AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THE ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT

PREVENTION GRANT FROM THE BOARD OF STATE AND

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE

BUDGET ACT

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-94, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF

GRANT FUNDS FROM THE BOARD OF STATE COMMUNITY

CORRECTIONS ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT PREVENTION GRANT

PROGRAM AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET

ACCORDINGLY

E. APPROVAL OF TRACT MA P NO. 38257 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 7

LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO J URUPA DRIVE, WEST OF BEACH

STREET, AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE, ACCEPTANCE OF

OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS –

REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR FURTHER

DISCUSSION

-6-

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38257 and accept the dedication as follows:

a. Accept the real property described as an easement for public street and public utility purposes for Lot “O” (Ranch Jurupa Drive) and portion of Lot “P” (Beach Street).

b. Accept the real property described as an easement for public purposes along with the r ight of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles for Lot “A” (Banker Lane), Lot “B” (Crossbay Loop), and Lot “C” (Perlino Way), indicated as “private streets” and within Lots “D” through “N”, inclusive indicated as a “private road easement”

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38257.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

F. APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 38258 PARADISE KNOL LS LOT 9

LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BEACH STREET AND RA NCHO JURUPA

DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF
IMPROVEMENT BONDS – REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38258 and accept the dedication as follows:

a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes for Lot “B” northwest corner cutoff at intersection of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Persano Street.

b. Accept the offer of dedication as an easement for public utility, drainage and public service ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (New Forest Lane), indicated as private street and portions of Lots 1 through 6 as shown on TM 38258

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38258.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

-7-

4. Accept the surety bonds for cons truction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

G. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE FROM PRECISION SURVEY SUPPLY, LLC FOR A LEICA RTC360 LASER SCANNER

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of a Leica RTC360 Laser Scanner Equipment in the amount of $109,354.01 for forensic photography.

A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Consent Calendar , with the exception of Item Nos. 13.E and 13.F, which were removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

13.E APPROVAL OF TRACT MA P NO. 38257 PARADISE KNOLLS LOT 7

LOCATED NORTH OF RAN CHO JURUPA D RIVE, WEST OF BEACH

STREET, AND SOUTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE, ACCEPTANCE OF

OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS

Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 13.E be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. He questioned why asphalt was installed along Limonite instead of traditional sidewalks with multi-purpose trails.

Paul Toor, Director of Public Works provided additional information and responded to Council’s comments.

A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve Tract Map 38257 and accept the dedication as follows:

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38257 and accept the dedication as follows:

2. Accept the real property described as an easement for public street and public utility purposes for Lot “O” (Ranch Jurupa Drive) and portion of Lot “P” (Beach Street).

-8-

3. Accept the real property described as an easement for public purposes along with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles for Lot “A” (Banker Lane), Lot “B” (Crossbay Loop), and Lot “C” (Perlino Way), indicated as “private streets” and within Lots “D” through “N”, inclusive indicated as a “private road easement”

4. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38257.

5. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

6. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: A. Carmona

13.F APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 38258 PARAD ISE KNOLLS LOT 9

LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BEACH STREET AND RA NCHO JURUPA

DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF

IMPROVEMENT BONDS
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 13.F be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. He questioned why asphalt was installed along Limonite instead of traditional sidewalks with multi-purpose trails.

Paul Toor, Director of Public Works provided additional information and responded to Council’s comments.

A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , second ed by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve Tract Map 38258 and accept the dedication as follows:

1. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes for Lot “B” northwest corner cutoff at intersection of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Persano Street.

2. Accept the offer of dedication as an easement for public utility, drainage and public service ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (New Forest Lane), indicated as private street and portions of Lots 1 through 6 as shown on TM 38258

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38258.

-9-

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: A. Carmona

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY A PPROVING ZONING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 23004 (ZCA23004) TO ADOPT PERMANENT
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SENATE BILL 9 (URBAN LOT

SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SENATE BILL 9) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND
66411.7(N) AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Staff Report presented by Tamara Campbell, Principal Planner. Ms. Campbell reported that SB 9 currently allows ministerial approval of two units (attached or detached) in the R-1 zone and an urban lot split on a 1,200 sq. ft. minimum lot. She outlined the recommended revisions to the ordinance that would comply with state law. The modifications include an expanded permitted list of single -family zones where SB 9 units would be allowed. She noted that SB 9 provisions would apply to equestrian areas only with S-F residential zoning as SB 9 provisions do not apply to agricultural zones since they are not considered primarily residential. As a result, a large part of the City’s equestrian protection overlay zone is zoned A-1; therefore, it will not be subject to or eligible for SB 9 units.

Further discussion followed.

Joe Perez, Community Development Director, provided additional comments and responded to Council’s questions.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing.

Masaki Mendoza spoke on behalf of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment . He stated that housing is a fundamental issue facing citizens today. He stated that the housing crisis impacts all but the wealthiest individuals. He stated that 31% of homes in Jurupa Valley have seven or more people living in them. Accordi ng to the Department of Housing and Urban Development , approximately 40% of

-10-

residents in Jurupa Valley are currently cost burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing. The solution to unaffordable housing is to build more of it on less land.

Mirna Torres spoke on behalf of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment, noting that it will allow homeowners to have a rental unit that generates income. She applauds the legislature for advocating for housing for all with creativity and risk and she will continue to advocate for housing for all.

Gary Conner voiced opposition to the proposed Zoning Code Amendment and expressed concerns that the ZCA expands the applicable zoning to include Residential Agricultural (R -A) and Rural Residential (R -R) areas. Th ese areas predominantly fall within the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay, thereby posing a significant risk to Jurupa Valley's equestrian community. The inclusion of these zones may result in unwelcome lot splits and compromise the integrity of the City’s equestrian way of life.

Following public comments, the City Clerk announced that as of 5:00 p.m., she received 7 letters in support and 174 letters in opposition to the proposed Zoning Code Amendment.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

Council Member Armando Carmona suggested that the Council could reassess the zoning in Sky Country to be consistent with the equestrian overlay.

Following discussion, Council Member Brian Berkson stated that he would be happy to have that conversation come back as a separat e item ; however, the proposed action tonight is to approve additional regulations relating to SB 9 housing units.

Further discussion followed regarding the timeline to assess zoning if it would be beneficial.

Following discussion, Mayor Chris Barajas stated that not everyone would like their property to be rezoned ; however, this is an issue that can be looked at separately.

A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona to c ontinue this item and do an assessment of a rezoning of R-A properties in order to rezone them to A-1 or to a zone that is consistent with the equestrian overlay and that is exempt from SB 9.

MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND

-11-

A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Brian Berkson , to introduce Ordinance No. 2023 -17, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7 (SUBDIVISIONS), AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING SECTION S9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND

9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND

ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT

PARCEL MAPS AND QUALIFYING HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9 (2021), AND MAKING A

FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson
Noes: A. Carmona

Absent: None
Abstained: G. Silva

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS

17. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that a presentation be brought back on SB 9 and the equestrian exemptions and a discussion on possible rezoning of properties within the equestrian overlay.

18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.

19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

20. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
There were no public comments regarding the closed session items.

B. EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION NEGOTIATIONS - UNREPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES. The City Council met in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 with the City's designated representatives regarding the salaries, salary schedules, and compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of its unrepresented employees for the purpose of reviewing its position and instructing the City's designated representatives. Final action on these issues will take place in open session. The City’s designated representatives are: City

-12-

Manager Rod Butler; Assistant City Manager Michael Flad; and Human Resources Manager Tanya Bragg.

21. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION
City Attorney Peter Thorson announced that there were no reportable actions taken under the Brown Act.

22. ADJOURNMENT
There being no fu rther business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 10:39 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held December 7, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.B

CHECK REGISTERS

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated October 26, and November 2, 8 , and 16, 2023 as well as the payroll register s dated October 27, 31 and November 10, 2023.

The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2023-24 Budget was adopted on June 15, 2023. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.

ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code. The check register dated November 16, 2023 includes an $11,405.54 payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached herewith.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
10/26/2023 $ 2,474,297.14
11/02/2023 $ 98,351.38
11/08/2023 $ 2,956,548.89
11/16/2023 $ 264,597.16

RETURN TO AGENDA

AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.C
-1-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-17

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 7.85 TO TITLE 7
(SUBDIVISIONS), AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10, AMENDING
SECTIONS 9.45.010, 9.55.010, 9.60.020, AND 9.65.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.300 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE

JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING

REGULATIONS RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLIT PARCEL

MAPS AND QUALIFYING HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9 (2021 ), AND MAKING A

FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) On September 16, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law, entitled the “California Home Act,” into law, which established a series of new regulations to allow for ministerial approval of urban lot splits and up to two residential units on parcels located in single -family residential zones as outlined in Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7. SB 9 took effect on January 1, 2022. (b) SB 9 requires cities to ministerially approve a parcel map for a n urban lot split and/or a proposed housing development containing a maximum of two residential units within a single-family residential zone, if the housing development or subdivision meets certain statutory criteria. SB 9 specifies that proposed projects and subdivisions cannot be proposed in prohibited locations under Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)(B) -(K), such as in an earthquake fault zone, lands under conservation easement, a federally designated flood plain, and high fire hazard severity zones as defined under state law.
(c) SB 9 further restricts the standards and regulations that local agencies may impose on qualifying housing developments or subdivisions. In addition, SB 9 permits a local agency to deny a proposed housing development or urban l ot split only if the agency makes a written finding based on preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety or the physical environment. (d) SB 9 specifically authorizes a city to establish objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards consistent with the bill’s provisions, and to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions. Such objective zoning, subdivision and design review standards may not have the effect of “physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet,” among certain other limitations.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

(e) At the January 20, 2022, regular City Council meeting, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022- 02 (Interim Ordinance) to establish interim regulations to implement SB 9 and include City - specific objective standards intended to limit the potential negative impacts resulting from density increases and incompatible land use patterns in single-family zones. This Interim Ordinance was effective for a 45-day period and was scheduled to expire on March 6, 2022. (f) Government Code Section 65858 allows two extensions of an in terim ordinance: an initial extension of 10 months and 15 days, and a second extension of one year. At the February 17, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022-03, which extended the Interim Ordinance’s expiration da te to January 20, 2023. At the December 12, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022- 25 extending the Interim Ordinance until January 20, 2024. (g) At the January 20, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to initiate amendments to the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to establish regulations related to SB 9 urban lot splits and housing developments (“Ordinance”) to be in effect prior to the expiration of the Interim Ordinance.
(h) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65854 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed hearing on the proposed Ordinance on October 25, 2023 at which time all persons interested in the proposed Ordinance had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65855 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, at the con clusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC -2023-22 providing a written recommendation to the City Council to adopt the Ordinance and specifying the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposed Ordinance to the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan.
(i) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65856 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.285.040, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Ordinance on November 16, 2023, at which time all persons interested in the Ordinance had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing. (j) The proposed Ordinance was proc essed and publically noticed in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, Planning Department Staff has determined that the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of

-3-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

the CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n) of the California Government Code, becaus e an ordinance adopted to implement the provisions of Senate Bill 9 is not considered a project under CEQA. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA review.
(b) The City Council has reviewed Community Development Department’s determination of exemption , and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with Staff’s determination of exemption.

Section 3. Consistency with the General Plan . The proposed amendments are consistent with the objectives of the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan for the following reasons:
(a) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.1 provides: “Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single-family and multi-family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General Plan, specific plans, the Equestrian L ifestyle Protection Overlay, and community and town center plans land use maps.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the standards to allow for the development of two -unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones. (b) General Pla n Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.4 provides: “Housing Quality and Variety. Accommodate the development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are accessible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones.
(c) General Plan Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.9 provides: “Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.” Adoption of this Ordinance will provide the objective standards to allow for the development of two-unit residential development projects in qualifying single-family zones.

Section 4. SB 9 Urban Lot Splits . Chapter 7.85 (Urban Lot Split Parcel Maps) of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby added to read as set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance, which is hereby incorporated as though set forth in full.

Section 5. Definitions. Chapter 9.10 (Definitions) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to add d efinitions of “Dwelling, primary ” as Section 9.10.455; “Dwelling Unit, Junior Accessory or JADU,” as Section 9.10.467; and “SB 9 Development Project” as Section 9.10.1125, each as set forth below, with all other definitions in Chapter 9.10 to remain the same:
“Sec. 9.10.455. - Dwelling, primary. The original dwelling on a property or, if the property is vacant, the larger of the two dwellings that are on the property.” “Sec. 9.10.467. - Dwelling unit, junior accessory or JADU.

-4-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

Has the same meaning ascribed in California Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time.”
“Sec. 9.10.1125. - SB 9 Development Project.

An Urban Lot Split pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 or a SB 9 Housing Development proposed pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.21 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 9.300.” “Sec. 9.10.1238. - Urban lot split.

A parcel map subdivision of a single family residential parcel as permitted pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 that creates no more than two parcels of approximately equal lot area.” Section 6. SB 9 Housing Developments . Chapter 9.300 (Senate Bill 9 Housing Development Standards) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby added to read as set forth in Exhibit B to this Ordinance, which is hereby incorporated as though set forth in full.

Section 7. SB 9 development allowed in R-R Zone. Sec. 9.45.010 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 20 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in the R -R Zone to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.45.010 unchanged:
“(20) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 8. SB 9 development allowed in R-1 Zone. Sec. 9.55.010 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 11 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in R -1 Zone to read as set forth below, with the remainder of Sec. 9.55.010 unchanged:
“(11) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 9. SB 9 development allowed in R -D Zone. Sec. 9.210.020 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 18 under subdivision “a” as a new use permitted in R-D Zone to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.210.020 unchanged:
“(18) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 10. SB 9 development allowed in R-A Zone. Sec. 9.65.020 is hereby amended to add as paragraph 19 under subdivision “a” as a use permitted in R -A Zones to read as set forth below, with the reminder of Sec. 9.65.020 unchanged:
“(19) SB 9 Development Project.”
Section 11. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would

-5-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 12. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 13. Effective Date . This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.

PASSED, APPROVED AND AD OPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of December, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-
12774-0007\2878490v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -17 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of November, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of December, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of December, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

A-1

Exhibit A
CHAPTER 7.85 URBAN LOT SPLIT PARCEL MAPS
Sec. 7.85.010. Purpose.

The purpose of these standards is to establish procedures and standards for the urban lot split parcel maps in single -family residential zoning districts (R -R, R-R-O, R-1, R-A and R -D) pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 (SB 9). These standards supplement and are in addition to the standards for parcel maps in Title 7 and the zoning standards in Title 9, in particular Chapter 9.300.

Sec. 7.85.020. Applicability.

This Chapter shall be applicable to a proposed division of land subdividing an existing parcel in a single-family residential zoning district to create no more than two new parcels subject to the requirements set forth in this Chapter and Government Code Section 66411.7, herein referred to as an “urban lot split.”
Sec. 7.85.030. Ministerial Review.

A. An urban lot split shall be processed as a parcel map, but no discretionary review or public hearing shall be conducted if all required criteria have been met.

B. Applicants are required to submit an application, including any maps, records, or other documents required by the Community Development Director. Applicants must provide a sworn statement affirming eligibility with Government Code Section 66411.7, Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85, and all other applicable regulations.

C. The City may, at the applicant’s expense, conduct independent inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of any or all portions of the sworn statement.

Sec. 7.85.040. Denial.

The City may deny an application for an urban lot split if the Building Official ma kes both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence:

A. The proposal would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2); and
B. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

A-2

Sec. 7.85.050. General Requirements.

The following standards shall apply to all urban lot splits:

A. The parcel must be located within a single-family residential zone. For purpose of this Chapter, single-family residential zoning districts include: R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R- D and R-A.

B. An urban lot split shall not be permitted on a parcel located in:
(1) Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the State Department of Conservation.
(2) Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
(3) A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Governm ent Code Section 51178, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 4202. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
(4) A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or State Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. (5) A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standa rds Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(6) A special flood haz ard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100 -year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency

A-3

Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless either of the following are met:
(1) the site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the City, or (2) the site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section

59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (7) A regulatory floodway as determi ned by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(8) Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat con servation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(9) Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
(10) Lands under conservation easement.
(11) A historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or a site that is designated or listed as a local landmark or historic property or district by the City.

C. The two lots resulting from an urban lot split shall be approximately equal in size, and no smaller than 40 percent or larger than 60 percent of the lot area of the original parcel.

D. The width of any lot resulting from an urban lot split shall not be less than 20 feet wide and access for flag lots shall not be less than 12 feet wide.

E. The proposed parcel map shall demonstrate the ability to access the public right-of- way in perpetuity. As necessary, easements shall be provided and maintained to allow for the provision of public services and facilities.

A-4

F. No lot resulting from an urban lot split shall have more than two residential units inclusive of any Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit.

G. Non-residential uses on the site are prohibited.

H. The short term rental for periods less than 30 days of any unit s on the site is prohibited.

I. Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split is prohibited.

J. The proposed urban lot split shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
(1) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(2) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(3) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application.
(4) Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an urban lot split application.

K. A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines is required, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

L. One off-street parking space is required for each unit created, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one-half mile walking distance of a high quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an urban lot split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot.

M. Prior to, or concurrent with the recordation of the final map, a property owner seeking approval of an urban lot split shall execute and record a covenant, supplied by the City and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, that contains the following provisions:
(1) Non-residential uses on the site shall be prohibited; (2) The short term rental for periods less than 30 days of any units on the site shall be prohibited;

A-5

(3) Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split shall be prohibited;
(4) Except as provided in Government Code Section 66411.7 for community land trusts and qualified nonprofit corporations, the owner of the property for which an urban lot split is proposed shall sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing units as their prin cipal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split;
(5) Ongoing compliance with all SB 9 requirements and restrictions shall be required;
(6) Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity; and (7) All required parking shall be maintained.

N. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 66411.7, all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, including the development standards in Chapter 9.300, shall apply, along with all applicable requirements of state law including the Subdivision Map Act.

Sec. 7.85.060. Exceptions.

The Community Development Director shall approve an exception to any of the standards specified in this Chapter upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units per lot or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area.

B-1

Exhibit B
CHAPTER 9.300 SENATE BILL 9 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Sec. 9.300.010. Applicability.

The purpose of these standards is to establish procedures and standards for SB 9 Housing Developments in single-family residential zoning districts (R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R-D, and R- A) pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.21. These standards supplement and are in addition to the zoning standards in Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 65852.21, all other regulations of the underlying zone of a property shall apply, along with all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municip al Code. If a conflict occurs between this Chapter and other provisions contained within the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, this Chapter shall govern.

Sec. 9.300.020. Ministerial Review.

A. Proposed SB 9 Housing Developments shall be permitted by right sub ject to ministerial review, with no hearing, by the Community Development Director or his or her designee to determine whether the criteria for approval have been met.

C. The City may, at the applicant’s expense, conduct independent inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of any or all portions of the sworn statement.

Sec. 9.300.030. Objective Standards.

All SB 9 Housing Developments shall comply with the following standards:

A. The parcel must be located within a single-family residential zone. For purpose of this Chapter, single -family residential zoning districts include: R -R, R-R-O, R-1, R- D, and R-A.

B. A SB 9 Housing Development shall not be permitted on a parcel located in:
(1) Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the State Department of Conservation.
(2) Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).

B-2

(3) A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, or within a hig h or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 4202. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
(4) A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or State Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. (5) A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Sect ion 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(6) A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100 -year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless either of the following are met:
(1) the site has been subject to a Let ter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the City, or (2) the site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section

B-3

Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(9) Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Prot ection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
(10) Lands under conservation easement.
(11) A historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or a site that is designated or listed as a local landmark or historic property or district by the City.

C. Non-residential uses on the site are prohibited.

D. Short term rentals for periods less than 30 days of any units on the site shall be prohibited.

E. One off-street parking space is required for each unit, unless the parcel upon which the unit is created is within one-half mile walking distance of a high quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or there is a car sha re vehicle located within one block of the project. Required parking for an urban lot split lot shall be accessed via an alley, if there is an alley adjacent to the lot.

F. Non-public utility electrical elements such as wires, conduits, junction boxes, transformers, ballasts, and switch and panel boxes shall be concealed from view from adjacent public rights-of-way.

G. All flashing, sheet metal vents, and pipe stacks shall be painted to match the adjacent roof or wall material.

H. Pedestrian access to a pub lic street or alley shall be provided with an exterior pedestrian pathway from the primary entrances of each unit to the adjoining sidewalk, street, or alley. Access to the public right-of-way shall be maintained in perpetuity.

I. One driveway per street frontage with a minimum of three feet wide landscape strip between the driveway and side lot line for the length of the driveway.

B-4

J. More than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of a Primary Dwelling shall not be demolished if the Primary Dwellin g has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.

K. A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines is required for all units, except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same area and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

L. No ADU or JADU shall be allowed on parcels that use both the authority contained within the Government Co de Section 658 52.21 and the authori ty contained in Government Code Section 66411.7.

M. A SB 9 Housing Development shall not require the demolition or alteration of any of the following:
(1) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(2) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(3) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.
(4) Housing units removed from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the 15 years prior to the submission of an SB 9 Housing Development application.
(5) More than twenty -five percent (25%) of the existing exterior structural walls, unless the proposed SB 9 Housing Development is located on a site that has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

N. For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test must have been completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years.

O. An urban lot split processed in accordance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.85 shall comply with SB 9 and the standards set forth in this Chapter.

P. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter or Government Code Section 65852.21, all other applicable regulations from the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, including Titles 7 (Subdivisions), 8 (Buildings and Construction) and 9 (Planning and Zoning), shall apply, along with all objective requirements of other applicable state law.

B-5

Sec. 9.300.040 Exceptions.

The Community Development Director shall approve an exce ption to any of the standards specified in this Chapter upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units per lot or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area.

Sec. 9.300.050. Denial of SB 9 Housing Development Application.

The Building Official may deny an application for an SB 9 Housing Development upon making both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence:

A. The proposal would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2); and,
B. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D

APPROVAL OF CITY HOLIDAY SCHEDULE

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2023-95, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY
OFFICES SHALL BE CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024

BACKGROUND
The California Government Code designates days that are state holidays. The code further provides that city offices shall be closed on state designated holidays unless otherwise provided for by the city. The proposed action by the City Council will meet the intent of the code sections.

ANALYSIS
The City needs to identify the days on which city offices will be closed. The City has the authority to designate what holidays or days the city offices will be closed. In general, the state designated holidays are the norm but there is no particular restriction or other days city offices may be closed.

The resolution includes the following holidays on which city offices will be closed for the 2024 Calendar Year:

RETURN TO AGENDA

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-95

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING

HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY OFFICES SHALL BE
CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Section 6700 of the California Government Code designates days that are holidays in the state; and
WHEREAS, Section 6702 of the California Government Code provides that City offices shall be closed on designated state holidays unless otherwise provided by the City; and WHERAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council desires and deems it in the best public interest to designate those holidays on which City offices will be closed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the C ity Council of the City of Jurupa Valley as follows:

Section 1. That the above recitations are true.

Section 2. That the public offices of the City shall be closed on the following dates in observance of indicated holidays:

January 1, 2024 New Year’s Day
January 15, 2024 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
February 19, 2024 Presidents’ Day
May 27, 2024 Memorial Day
July 4, 2024 Independence Day
September 2, 2024 Labor Day
November 11, 2024 Veteran’s Day
November 28, 2024 Thanksgiving Day
November 29, 2024 Day after Thanksgiving
December 24, 2024 Christmas Eve
December 25, 2024 Christmas Day

Section 3. That all City holidays shall be observed as follows: If a holiday falls upon a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be deemed to be the holiday. If a holiday falls upon a Sunday, the following Monday shall be deemed to be the holiday.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of December, 2023.

-2-
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-95 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of December, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of December, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 14.E

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC R OAD
AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO MISSION BLVD. (9880
MISSION, LLC, APN 170-240-030)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and utility purposes, including public services purposes over , upon, across, and within the area as described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B of DED22-002.

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-002.

BACKGROUND
9880 Mission, LLC is the owner of the area shown on Exhibit B of DED22-002.

As part of the site development permit (SDP19006) for the construction of a 2,560 square foot tire service building, the owner is conditioned to dedicate a portion of APN 170-240- 030 for public road and utility purposes as shown in Exhibit B.

The applicant submitted the required offer of dedication documents and staff reviewed the documents, and fou nd them in compliance with the California Government Code (7050), local ordinances, and the conditions of approval for this development.

ANALYSIS
In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedications, staff prepared a certificate of acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

dedication will grant the City an easement for public road and drainage purposes a nd allow improvements along Mission Blvd.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 14.F

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC R OAD
AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO 3742 RIVERVIEW DR .
(TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT CHARLES SCOTT, SR. REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST, APN 170-070-007)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-002.

BACKGROUND
Trustee of the Robert Charles Scott, Sr. Revocable Living Trust is the owner of the area shown on Exhibit B of DED23-002.

As a part of the site development permit (SDP21040) for the construction of a 9,736 square foot freestanding commercial building (Action Plumbing Supply) , the owner is conditioned to dedicate a portion of APN 179-070-007 for public road and utility purposes as shown in Exhibit B.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedications, staff prepared a certificate of acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of dedication will grant the City an easement for public road and drainage purposes a nd allow improvements along Riverview Dr.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.G

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

CALIFORNIA WOOD RECYCLING, INC DBA AGROMIN FOR SENATE
BILL 1383 PROCUREMENT

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and California Wood Recycling, Inc. DBA Agromin for Senate Bill 1383 procurement and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
The City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) is required to comply wi th various state mandates for the purposes of achieving landfill diversion. Diversion is the process of redirecting waste away from landfills so they may be recycled or reused.

On September 19, 2016, Senate Bill 1383 (“SB 1383”), the Short -lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act, was signed into law and established statewide methane emission targets and is the most significant waste reduction mandate to be adopted in California in the last 30 years. The statewide goal under SB 1383 is to reduce organic waste disposal by 75 percent and increase edible food recovery by 20 percent by the year 2025. In addition to establishing these statewide goals, jurisdictions were required to adopt an organic recycling ordinance, which the City adopted in December 2021 as Ordinance No. 2021 -

27. This legislation requires businesses, multi -family dwellings, and single-family residential properties to have access to recycling programs that collect food waste, green waste, wood waste, and fibers, such as paper and cardboard.

ANALYSIS
The State of California (“the State”) relies on the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, known as CalRecycle, a department within the California

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

Environmental Protection Agency to develop regulations associated with waste and recycling laws passed by the legislature.

To comply with SB 1383, the City will be required to implement organic waste collection services to all residents and businesses, which includes green waste, wood waste, food waste, fibers, etc. In addition, cities are required to procure organic waste products such as compost, renewable gas, and mulch. The quantity of organic waste products to be procured by each jurisdiction is dependent on the population multiplied by .08 tons per resident. Based on this calculation, the City will be required to procure 8,648 tons of organic waste products annually.

Given the magnitude of organic waste to be procured, CalRecycle is allowing jurisdictions to procure in phases. In 2023, the City is required to procure 1,505 tons of compost. The City is not required to keep the procured 1,505 tons within City limits. Most cities have opted to procure the compost and make it available to farmers throughout California by working with compost producers.

City staff approached the City’s waste hauler, Burrtec Waste Industries (“Burrtec”) to assist in fulfilling the procurement requirement. In addition, City staff also contacted other companies that work with organics facilities to produce compost.

Proposer Total Amount
Zero Food Print $31,600.80
Agromin $33,000.00
Greenleaf Power $50,000.00

While Zero Food Print provided the lowest quote, they are not able to meet the procurement target by the end of 2023. For this reason, Staff is recommending the City pursue Agromin located in Oxnard, California. Agromin serves over 200 California communities and is one of the largest organics recyclers in the state. Agromin will procure the compost on the City’s behalf and is guaranteeing that the procurement target will be met by the end of 2023 . In addition, Agromin has already identified a location in Santa Barbara County that has the capacity to accept 1,500 tons of compost. Upon approval of the agreement, Agromin will begin delivering the compost to Santa Barbara County.

Burrtec was unable to provide a competitive quote for compost; however, Burrtec will deliver compost to a City facility, which can be used for a compost giveaway event for Jurupa Valley residents.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

If approved, the compost will be purchased using CalRecycle grant funds from the SB 1383 Local Assistance G rant program, Account No. 285-2850-58024. There is no financial impact to the general fund.

Page | 3

ALTERNATIVES

1) Do not approve the agreement and elect not to fulfill 2023 procurement target.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ***********************

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.H

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF FY
2022-23 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONE K OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-C AND PLACEMENT ON THE SECOND

INSTALLMENT OF THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR
2023-2024

RECOMMENDATION
1) Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-96, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA VALLEY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF F Y 2022-23 DELINQUENT

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN Z ONE K OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTI NG MAINTENANCE DISTR ICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y, COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON THE P ROPERTY TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BACKGROUND
On July 7, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -70, which among other things, confirmed the assessment diagrams and assessments for the 40 Zones, including Zone K ("Zone K”), of City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated ("JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C") for F Y 2022-2023. The City’s former consultant submitted the assessments to the Riverside Count y Assessor for placement on the Fiscal Year 2022-23 tax rolls with the exception of Zone K , which was unintentionally omitted. In F Y 2023-2024, City staff prepared and mailed a manually prepared bill to each of the property owners of the 25 assessable parcels located in Zone K for the amount of the assessment for each parcel.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

The City has received payment from 8 of the 25 parcels. The City desires to place the remaining 17 delinquent F Y 2022-23 assessments in Zone K on the F Y 2023-2024 Assessment Roll for f urther collection on the second i nstallment due and payable by property owners by April 10, 2024.

ANALYSIS

Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-96 confirms the assessment levy and placement of the delinquent FY 2022-23 assessments on the FY 2023-24 tax roll. Two of the 15 delinquent parcels have changed ownership since the approval of Resolution No. 2022-70. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the current owners are only responsible for the payment of the assessment proportional to the time t hey have owned the property during FY 2022 -23, which portion ($10,225.24) will be collected by placement of their proportional assessment on the FY 2023-24 tax roll. The previous owners are responsible for the remaining FY 2022 -23 assessment ($814.90). However, the cost of locating the prior owners and cost of collection of the pr evious owner’s portion of the assessment through collection agencies would most likely exceed the assessment amount. Therefore, staff is recommend writing-off the prior owner’s proportion as uncollectible.

Assessor
Parcel
Number Sale Date Situs Address
FY 22-23
Delinquent
Assessment -
Current Owner
FY 22-23
Delinquent
Assessment - Prior
Owner - Write Off
Total FY 22-23
Delinquent
Assessment
166040028 N/A 8083 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040030 N/A 4624 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040031 N/A 4612 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040032 N/A 4601 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040033 N/A 4613 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040035 N/A 8143 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040036 N/A 8155 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040037 N/A 4620 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040038 N/A 4608 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040040 N/A 4615 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040041 N/A 4627 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040044 N/A 8148 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040045 N/A 8136 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040049 N/A 8080 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040051 N/A 8052 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 $ - $ 649.42 166040043 3/8/2023 8160 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 202.82 $ 446.59 $ 649.42 166040039 1/23/2023 4603 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 281.12 $ 368.30 $ 649.42 $ 10,225.24 $ 814.89 $ 11,040.14 $ (206.15)
$ 10,019.09
Approx County Levy Fees
Total Assessment
Net Assessment Revenue
Page | 3

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The net collectible amount of the FY 2022-23 delinquent Zone K assessments and net of approximately $206.15 in County fees is expected to be $10,019.09. Adoption of this resolution will allow the City to collect funds to maintain Zone K of the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District.

All costs for administration of the District are currently paid by the assessments to the benefitted parcels within the District.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not collect the delinquent assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in Zone K including (a) the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation services to Zone K (b) paying Edison for street light energy costs in Zone K, which services would need to be reduced or discontinued.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-96

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
LEVY AND COLLECTION OF FY 2022 -23 DELINQUENT

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONE K OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

WHEREAS, On July 7, 2022, the City Council (hereinafter the "City Council") of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the "City"), adopted Resolution No. 202 2-70, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being part of Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the “Streets and Highways Code”), which among other things, confirmed the assessment diagrams and assessments and the adoption of such a resolution constituted the levy of an assessment on all assessable lots and parcels of land withi n the 40 Zones, including Zone K (hereinafter "Zone K”), of City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter "JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C"), for FY 2022-2023.

WHEREAS, Resolution 2022-70 directed, among other things, t he City Clerk to file a certified copy of th e Resolution 2022-70 together with the assessment s with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of Streets and Highways Code, to enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for FY 2022-2023.

WHEREAS, Assessments for Zone K of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for FY 2022-2023 were not submitted to t he County Auditor of the County of Riverside and not entered on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon (hereinafter the "Assessment Roll").

WHEREAS, In FY 2023-2024, City prepared and mailed to each of the property owners of the 25 assessable parcels located in Zone K a manually prepared bill for the amount of the assessment for each parcel as approved in Resolution 2022-70.

WHEREAS, The City has received payment from 8 of the 25 parcels. The City desires to place the remaining 17 uncollected FY 2022-23 assessments in Zone K on the FY 2023 -2024 Assessment Roll for further collection on the 2nd Installment due and payable by property owners by April 10, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, as follows:

Section 1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct. -2-
Section 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 20 23-___, there is to be levied the 17 remaining Fiscal Year 2022-2023 delinquent assessments on parcels of Zone K as set forth in an electronic format acceptable to the Auditor-Controller of the County as provided by Harris & Associates, Inc. on the FY 2023-2024 Assessment Roll for further collection on the 2nd Installment due and payable by current property owners by April 10, 2024 . The Zone K Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 delinquent assessments are as follows:

Section 3. The Auditor-Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the assessments levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked “JV LLMD ZONE K 22-23 DELINQUENCY” on the next Installment of the FY 2023- 2024 County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.

Section 4. The County Auditor-Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render the City a detailed report showing the amounts of the assessment installments, penalties, interest and fees collected and from which properties they have been colle cted. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in Assessor
Parcel
Number Situs Address
FY 22-23
Delinquent
Assessment -
Current Owner
166040028 8083 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040030 4624 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040031 4612 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040032 4601 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040033 4613 CASHEL CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040035 8143 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040036 8155 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040037 4620 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040038 4608 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040040 4615 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040041 4627 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040044 8148 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040045 8136 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040049 8080 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040051 8052 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 649.42 166040043 8160 BIG RANGE DR JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 202.82 166040039 4603 BELLEVIEW CT JURUPA VALLEY CA 92509 $ 281.12 $ 10,225.24 Total Assessment
-3-
accordance with a contract entered into between the City and Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of December, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-96 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of December, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of December, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.I

APPROVAL TO PURCHASE FORD ESCAPE HYBRID

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the purchase of a Ford Escape Hybrid vehicle for $37,022.23, including taxes and fees.

BACKGROUND
The City is in the process of hiring in-house employees to replace outside consultants as directed by the City Council. The City has been making a reasonable effort to develop our own fleet to prov ide vehicles for new employees . Since 2015, the City has purchased twenty vehicles to add to its fleet of 29 vehicles. These vehicles consist of passenger vehicles and service trucks. The most recent vehicle purchased was approved on August 17, 2023 for a replacement service truck.

Of the twenty vehicles purchased since 2015, all but two vehicle purchases were made possible through Assembly Bill 2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention Program (“AB 2766”). The funds from the P rogram are distributed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( “SCAQMD”). SCAQMD provides funding to cities and counties to assist in developing clean transportation programs reducing vehicle emissions.

ANALYSIS
City staff solicited proposals from three local dealerships listed as follows:

Dealer Location Price
Citrus Ford Ontario, CA $37,022.23
Fritts Ford Riverside, CA $38,626.08
Sunrise Ford Fontana, CA $38,740.16

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

Staff is recommending the purchase of one 2023 Ford Escape Hybrid from Citrus Ford in Ontario as their proposal is the most competitive . The Ford Escape Hybrid is known for its reliability and low emission standards, which will enable the City to utilize SCAQMD funds.

As the City grows, additional vehicles will be needed to fulfill responsibilities and maintain efficiency. As a part of fleet maintenance efficiency, the City is targeting the purchase of Ford or Toyota vehicles as its standard. City staff is continuing to explore other potential funding sources for future vehicle purchases. Adding to the City’s fleet inventory will ensure there are no disruptions in completing day-to-day responsibilities.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The cost of the 2023 Ford Escape Hybrid is $ 37,022.23. If approved, the funding will come from the AB 2766 Program of the SCAQMD.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Not approve the vehicle purchases

2. Provide alternative direction

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
$388,479120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.J

APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEME NT WITH

RRM DESIGN FOR THE PREPARATION OF PERMIT-READY

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with RRM Design Group for the preparation of permit ready accessory dwelling unit (PRADU) plans.

BACKGROUND
On March 2, 2023, the City Council approved a contract with RRM Design Group in the amount of $111,039 to develop permit -ready plans for accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

The objective of the Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (PRADU) project is to promote the construction of ADUs by providing property owners with a range of alternative PRADU plans. These plans offer customizable options, allowing for variations in architectural style, exterior materials, and fenestration to align with individual owners' preferences .

Once the final PRADU plans are completed and made available to the public, they will significantly reduce costs for applicants who would otherwise need to prepare their own plans. Additionally, this will expedite the approval process for ADUs during the building plan check phase.

On September 21, 2023, the City Council reviewed the preliminary PRADU plans. The City Council supported the designs and , in addition, requested that the floor plans be reversible to allow greater flexibility in siting an ADU on a property and that a two-car detached garage option be added to the PRADU plan set.

The funding for this project is derived from a $500,000 Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant from the California Department of Housing a portion of which has been allocated to the PRADU project.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.K

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
STORM WATER INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC. FOR

THE INSTALLATION OF CERTIFIED FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM

TRASH TREATMENT CONTROL DEVICES

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc. (“SWIMS”), for an amount not to exceed $112,785.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
On April 7, 2015, the State Water Resources Control Board ( “SWRCB”) adopted statewide Trash Provisions to two (2) of their Water Quality Control Plans: Ocean Waters of California Plan and the Inland Surface Waters Plan. These provisions are referred to as Trash Amendments and are directed to Phase I and Phase II MS4 permittees who retain regulatory authority over Priority Land Uses.

Priority Land Uses are developed sites that include: High Density Residential (10 or more Dwelling Units/Ace), Industrial, Commercial, Mixed Urban, Public Transportation Stations and Stops, Alternative Areas determined by the Permittees, and other Areas Determined by the State.

The Trash Amendments require MS4 permittees, such as the City of Jurupa Valley , to select one of two available methods to satisfy compliance with the trash prohibitions.  Track 1 – Install, operate, and maintain Full Capture Systems (“FCS”) for all storm drains that capture runoff, or;
 Track 2 – Install, operate, and maintain any combination of FCS, multi -benefit

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

projects, other treatment controls, and/or institutional cont rols within either the jurisdiction of the MS4 permittee or within the jurisdiction of the MS4 permittee and contiguous MS4 permittees.

On June 2, 2017, the City received a Water Code Section 13383 Order requiring the City to make a selection between the two tracks. On August 31, 2017, the City selected Track 1 (Attachment B ) which requires the installation and maintenance of FCS for all storm drains that capture runoff from the priority land uses in their jurisdictions.

FCS are installed in individual storm catch basins to capture trash as it enters the catch basin and prevent the trash from flowing through the storm drain system into local receiving waters . Trapped sediment and debris must be removed periodically either manually or by vacuum truck. To date, the City has installed 92 FCS, primarily in the industrial region of the City. To satisfy compliance with the Trash Amendments, the City will need to install FCS at all storm catch basins by December 2030.

On September 15, 2023, Staff published a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for Certified Full Capture System Trash Treatment Control Devices. The RFP was published on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web based procurement system. The scope of work included installing 73 FCS throughout the City. The solicitation closed on October 16, 2023, and the City received two (2) responsive proposals.

ANALYSIS
Proposals received by the City (in alphabetical order):

Proposer Total Amount

1. United Storm Water, Inc., City of Industry, CA $64,167.00

2. Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc., Discovery Bay, CA
$112,785.00*
* Recommended Proposal : The initial submission quoted a price of $120,085, which was subsequently negotiated down to $112,785. This adjustment was made with the stipulation that the City would assume the responsibility of traffic control for 10 locations on Mission Boulevard.

Public Works staff reviewed the proposals per guidelines as set forth in the RFP and Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc. “ SWIMS”, is the best-qualified proposer. SWIMS proposed installation of StormTek devices, which are certified by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (“SARWQCB”). These devices are high performing and have the ability to capture trash as small as five millimeters in diameter.

SWIMS has been in business for over 24 years and has contracts with local municipalities such as the Cities of Ventura, Milpitas, and Sunnyvale.

Although the United Storm Water Inc. proposal was the lowest and their FCS are also approved by the SARWQCB, their devices are designed to be permanently bolted to the catch basin wall . For the ease of cleaning and maintenance staff is recommending to award the contract to SWIMS.

Page | 3

The StormTek FCS attaches to the existing catch basin wall in front of the outflow pipe and can be easily removed by detaching the FCS from the hinges for thorough cleaning.

Removing the built up trash in the device can be performed using standard storm water cleaning equipment. The devices are built to last decades and surpass rigorous state and federal regulations including access for mosquito and vector control.

Public Works staff identified the 73 storm drain locations based on the 506 Priority Land Use locations that were previously identified. SWIMS will install the devices in accordance with unit prices as established in the Agreement. In-house staff will inspect and supervise the installation of all FCS devices. If approved, it is anticipated that the work will be completed by March 2024.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed Agreement calls for a not to exceed amount of $112,785.00 through the term of the Agreement. This item is budgeted in the Public Works Engineering budget, Account No. 100-1320-54110.

ALTERNATIVES
1) Do not approve the Agreement for the 73 Full Capture System with SWIMS. 2) Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND STORM WATER INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF

CERTIFIED FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM TRASH TREATMENT CONTROL DEVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of December 7, 2023, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and Storm Water Inspection and Maintenance Services, Inc., a California Corporation (“Contractor”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on December 11, 2023, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than June 30, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. Services
Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Contractor shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Contractor to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred and twelve thousand seven hundred eighty-five dollars ($112,785.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.

C. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor’s fees it -2-

shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause A. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default Of Contractor
A. The Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Prevailing Wages
A. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by and in accordance with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1720 et. seq. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute by this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of -3-

the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html.

8. Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
A. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contractor shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Contractor.

-4-

9. Indemnification
A. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Contractor shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor or any of its officers, employee, sub-Contractors, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement.

In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Contractor exceed the Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8.

B. Other Indemnities. In connection with any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Damages” hereinafter) not covered by Paragraph 9.A. above, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Contractor shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims, including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Contractor’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section 9.B. shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

10. Insurance Requirements
A. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
b) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no -5-

automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
c) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker’s compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. d) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Contractor’s profession. 2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
a) General Liability: Two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c) Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of
California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- -6-

insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Contractor of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Contractor shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Contractor’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

11. Independent Contractor
A. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. -7-

Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

12. Legal Responsibilities
The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.

13. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City’s prior written authorization.

B. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

14. Assignment
The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-Contractors described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-Contractors shall be borne by the Contractor and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

15. General Provisions
A. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. -8-

Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: Paul Toor, Director of Public Works
To Contractor: Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc.

P.O. Box 1627
Discovery Bay, CA 94505
Attention: Todd Hudson, Vice President

B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor’s sub- Contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. -9-

F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

-10-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

STORM WATER INSPECTION AND
MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC.

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

[SIGNATURES OF PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF CORPORATION OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED FOR CORPORATION; SIGNATURE OF MANAGING MEMBER REQUIRED FOR LLC OR LLP]

-11-

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Contractor will install 73 certified full capture devices throughout the City at locations specified in Exhibit B. Contractor shall provide all labor, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the installation. Any damage to infrastructure caused by the Contractor during installation shall be repaired by the Contractor.

In accordance with the Trash Provisions, all trash treatment control devices shall meet the Full Capture Systems definition and be certified by the State Water Resources Control Board Executive Director, or designee, prior to installation.

Contractor must coordinate with the Public Works Environmental Programs Manager prior to installing any device. Work is permitted between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., provided written permission is obtained beforehand for activities outside these hours. No work is permitted to occur on City observed holidays.

The installation of 10 devices on Mission Blvd will be supported by traffic control provided by the City of Jurupa Valley. The duration of this work shall not exceed 2 days. Contractor employees must possess confined space certification to execute the installation of the full capture devices.

Contractor’s proposal dated 10/11/23 is attached.

-12-

-13-

-14-

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

-29-

-30-

-31-

-32-

-33-

-34-

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
The cost of work shall not exceed $112,785.00. Contractor’s cost proposal is attached immediately following this page.

The initial submission quoted a price of $120,085, which was subsequently negotiated down to $112,785. This adjustment was made with the stipulation that the City would assume the responsibility of traffic control for 10 locations on Mission Blvd.

-35-

-36-

-37-

-38-

ATTACHMENT B
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING
THE ZONE (CZ 23007) OF APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES O F REAL

PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD BETWEEN
CAMINO REAL AND SOTO AVENUE (APNS: 174 -160-003, 174-160- 010, 174-180-021, AND 174-150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A-1) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) AND DETERMINE THAT

NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT

TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

RECOMMENDATION
1) By motion, that the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-18, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONE (CZ 23007) OF
APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES OR REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF

MISSION BOULEVARD BETWEEN CAMINO REAL AND SOTO AVENUE
(APNS: 174 -160-003, 174 -160-010, 174 -180-021, AND 174 -150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A-1) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) AND

DETERMINE THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

BACKGROUND
Upon incorporation of Jurupa Valley in 2011, the County of Riverside General Plan, zoning map, and other regulations were adopted and in effect. On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. The adoption included 21 land use amendments (LUAs) to the

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

General Plan Land Use Map that addressed land use issues, including providing additional commercial and residential uses and buffering residential development from industrial uses. By law, a city’s zoning must be consiste nt with its General Plan. Many of the 21 Land Use Map changes resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the new General Plan.

Upon General Plan adoption, the Council acknowledged that a zoning implementation program would be needed to evaluate the appropriate zoning of the Land Use Amendments (LUAs) site. On November 15, 2018, the City Council initiated a Zoning Implementation Program and requested that the Planning Commission evaluate appropriate zoning for the LUA sites. The goal was to make recommendations for Zoning Map amendments to the City Council that are consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. As directed, the Commission has and will continue to conduct public hearings and forward recommendations on rezones to the City Council.

Importantly, at the time of the 2017 General Plan adoption, the City had limited resources to remedy all of the inconsistencies that it inherited from the County of Riverside. The Community Development Department continues to discover numerous other sites located throughout Jurupa Valley that are encumbered with inconsistencies between its zoning map and General Plan Land Use Map. Such inconsistencies have the potential to stall financial investment, thwart redevelopment efforts and potentially cause the deterioration of properties.

The owner of Crown Ace Hardware at 7351 Mission Boulevard met with members of the City’s Community Development Department and presented plans for a potential expansion of the building and u se. During that discussion, it became apparent that the General Plan and the Zoning Map are inconsistent and therefore not in compliance with State law.

In an effort to fix the inconsistency and the property ’s problematic zoning, it is recommended that the City process a zone change on behalf of the property owner. In addition, during the procedure of analyzing the surrounding properties’ land use and zone, two other sites in near proximity to Crown Ace Hardware were found to have the same hindrance to development and are recommended, and included, to the same change of zone. Exhibit A depicts the General Plan Land Use designation of CR (Commercial Retail) for the three sites. Exhibits B and C demonstrate that the sites are zoned A -1 (Limited Agriculture) and the proposed zoning of C-1/C-P (General Commercial).

At a public hearing held on September 27, 2023 , the Planning Commission voted 4 – 0 to adopt Re solution No. PC-2023-19 and to forward a recommendation of approval for the rezone to the City Council.

Page | 3

EXHIBIT A. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP: COMMERCIAL RETAIL (CR)

EXHIBIT B. EXISTING ZONING MAP: A-1 ZONE (A-!)

Page | 4

EXHIBIT C. PROPOSED ZONING MAP: C-1/C-P ZONE

ANALYSIS

1. Site A
Site A is located at the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Camino Real and consists of 2 parcels of approximately 3.4 combined acres in size as illustrated on the aerial photo below (Exhibit D). The parcels are currently vacant but have been used for truck storage in the past. Surrounding land uses include single -family dwellings to the west and a Riverside County Fire Station to the east. The Cove Water Park lies to the south and the Pomona Freeway bounds the site to the north.

The General Plan Land Use designation for each parcel is CR (Commercial Retail). The existing zoning is A -1 (Limited Agriculture). Surrounding zoning is R -1 (On e Family Dwellings) to the west and C-1/C-P (General Commercial) to the east. Exhibits B and C show the existing and proposed zoning classifications.

Page | 5

TABLE 1 – SITE A: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 174-160-003, 174-160-010
TOTAL ACREAGE OF SITE 3.4 ACRES

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION COMMERCIAL RETAIL EXISTING ZONING A-1(LIMITED

AGRICULTURE)

EXHIBIT D. AERIAL PHOTO (CZ23007 – SITE A)

2. Site B
Site B consists of 1 parcel of approximately 1.55 acres in size, located on the north side of Mission Boulevard near the northwest intersection of Mission Boulevard and Byrne Road, south of the Pomona Freeway as illustrated on the aerial photo below (Exhib it E).

The parcel is currently developed with an Ace Hardware store and parking. There are scattered single-family dwellings along with a liquor store, an upholstery business and a feed store to the south. To the west is the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. To the east is vacant land. The existing zoning is A-1 (Limited Agriculture), however, the General Plan is CR (Commercial Retail) along the entire north side of Mission Boulevard between Camino Real and Soto Avenue.

Page | 6

TABLE 2 - GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 174-180-021
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 1.55

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

DESIGNATION

CR (COMMERCIAL RETAIL)
EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION A-1 (LIMITED AGRICULTURE)

EXHIBIT E – AERIAL PHOTO (CZ23007- SITE B)

3. Site C
Site C consists of 1 parcel on 4.22 acres located near the northeast intersection of Mission Boulevard and Byrne Road (APN 174 -500-022). See Exhibit F for the site location.

Surrounding land uses include the Pomona Freeway to the north, an Ace Hardware store to the west and commercial uses to the south. Scattered single-family homes occur to the east along with miscellaneous commercial uses.

Page | 7

EXHIBIT F. AERIAL PHOTO (CZ 23007: SITE C)

As with Sites A and B, changing the zone of Site C from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to C- 1/C-P (General Commercial) , is proposed to provide consistency between the General Plan Map and the City’s zoning map.

TABLE 4 - GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 174-150-002
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 4.22
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION CR (Commercial Retail) EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION A-1 (Limited Agriculture)

Recommended Rezone from A-1 to C-1/C-P for General Plan Consistency It is recommended that these sites be rezoned to C -1/C-P in order to be consistent with the General Plan vision and land use designation for these properties on Mission Boulevard. The existing zone, A-1 – Limited Agriculture, is not consistent with the General Plan land use designation for this site. See Attachment No. 4 for the A-1 zone. It permits a wide range of uses that pertain to the growing of produce, nurseries, green houses, and the canning and/or other processing of such products. The grazing of cattle, horses, sheep, goats or other farm stock is also permitted. Examples of other permitted uses include, but are not limited to, the following:

Page | 8

 Single family dwellings;
 Public parks;
 Raising crowing fowl (with limitations)
 Kennels and catteries;
 Mining operations;
 Noncommercial raising of miniature pigs (with limitations)  Outside storage of irrigation equipment and other farming machinery.

A review of the land use patterns in the immediate areas surrounding Sites A, B and C, reveals that very few properties are currently used for agricultural related uses as identified above. With the exception of a feed store, most of the properties are developed with uses more commonly found in commercial zones.

Chapter 9.175, C -1/C-P Zone, of the City ’s zoning code is included with this report as Attachment 5. The zone allows a substantial number of commercial uses subject to approval of an SDP such as retail sales, banks, bakeries, appliance stores, offices, auto repair, hotels and theaters. Other examples of uses allowed with a CUP are auto repair, animal hospitals, and bowling alleys.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the City Council public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on November 25, 2023. At the time of preparation of this report, no comments had been received.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Previous Environmental Document (PED) Review Determina tion was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.).

The PED was prepared to determine if the zone change (Project) is within the scope of the analysis contained in City of Jurupa Valley, 2017 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report State Clea ringhouse No. 2016021025 certified by the City Council on September 17, 2017, and to ensure that the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.

The zone changes would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures tha n those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR.

The effects associated with the zone changes would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved 2017 General Plan FEIR, and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. Moreover, the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts

ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance
-1-

ORDINANCE NO. 2023-18

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
CHANGING THE ZONE (CZ 23007) OF APPROXIMATELY
9 ACRES OR REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF

MISSION BOULEVARD BETWEEN CAMINO REAL AND
SOTO AVENUE ( APNS: 174-160-003, 174 -160-010, 174 -180- 021, AND 174-150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A-
1) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C -1/C-P) AND

DETERMINE THAT N O FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. The adoption included 21 amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map that addressed land use issues, including providing additional commercial and residential uses and buffering residential development from industrial uses. By law, a city’s zoning must be consistent with its General Plan. Many of the 21 Land Use Map changes resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the General Plan. The owner of Crown Ace Hardware retail business at 7351 Mission Boulevard discussed an expansion of the business with members of the Community Development Department. During that discussion, it became apparent that reinvestment into the property would not be possible due to the inconsistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Map. Two neighboring sites have the same conflicting General Plan and Zoning Map designations . The City Council initiated a rezone of approximately 9 acres of real property located north of Mission Boulevar d between Camino Real and Soto Avenue (the “Project”) (APNs: 174-160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, and 174-150-022 (Sites A, B and C)) from Limited Agriculture (A-1) to General Commercial (C -1/C-P) as depicted in Exhibit “A” so that the zoning map and General Plan Land Use Map are consistent for these properties.

Section 2. Change of Zone.
(a) The City Council desires to adopt a rezone of approximately 9 acres of real property located north of Mission Boulevard between Camino Real and Soto Avenue (APNs: 174- 160-003, 174 -160-010, 174 -180-021, and 174-150-022 (Sites A, B, and C ) from Limited Agriculture (A-1) to General Commercial (C-1/C-P) as depicted in Exhibit “A” so that the zoning map and General Plan Land Use Map are consistent for these properties. (b) Section 9.285.010. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that amendments to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 65800 et seq. , as now enacted or hereafter amended, and with the requirements of Title 9. Government Code Section 65853 provides that an

-2-

amendment to a zoning ordinance, which amendment changes any property from one zone to another, shall be adopted in the manner set forth in Sections 65854 to 65857, inclusive. (c) Government Code Section 65854 provides that the P lanning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance , with notice of the hearing given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and, if the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance affects the permitted uses of real property, also given pursuant to Government Code Section 65091. Additionally, Sections 9.285.040.(1) and (2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that th e Planning Commission shall hold a noticed public hearing on a proposed amendment to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code that proposes to change property from one zone to another.
(d) Government Code Section 65855 provides that after the hearing , the Planning Commission must render its decision in the form of a written recommendation to the legislative body, which must include the reasons for the recommendation, the relationship of the proposed amendment to applicable general and specific plans, and must transmit the recommendation to the legislative body in such form and manner as may be specified by the legislative body. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that, after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission must render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposed amendment to the 2017 General Plan. A copy of the recommendation shall be mailed to the applicant and proof thereof shall be shown on the original transmitted to the City Council. (e) Government Code Section 65856(a) provides that upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the legislative body must hold a public hearing.

Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.
(f) Government Code Section 65857 provides that the legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the P lanning Commission; provided that any modification of the proposed ordinance or amendment by the legislative body no t previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearing, must first be referred to the P lanning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing thereon. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.( 5) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing the City Council must render its decision within a reasonable time and may approve, modify , or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, however, that any proposed modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Planning Commission must first be referred back to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation.

Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, and declare that:

-3-

(a) The application for MA No. 23012 (CZ23007) was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner p rescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances.
(b) On September 27, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 23012 (CZ23007), at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters .

Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-19 on a 4-0 vote recommending approval of the Project, subject to conditions of approval.
(c) On December 7, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on MA No. 23012 (CZ23007) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters . F ollowing the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of proposed Change of Zone No. 23007:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), a Previous Environmental Document (PED) Review Determination was prepared to determine if the zone change is within the scope of the analysis contained in City of Jurupa Valley, 2017 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025 certified by the City Council on September 17, 2017, and to ensure that the zone change does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously. The effects associated with the zone changes would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved 2017 General Plan FEIR, and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the 2017 General Plan FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR, thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental Review is required.

Section 5. Findings for Approval of Change of Zone. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby finds and determines that Change of Zone No. 23007 should be adopted because:
(a) The proposed Project will comply with the development standards applicable to developments on premises in the C -1/C-P Zone as set forth in Jurupa Val ley Municipal Code Sections 9.115.020.
(b) The proposed C-1/C-P Zone is consistent with the Commercial Retail land use designation of the City’s Gener al Plan and the C-1/C-P zone land use regulations are compatible with the existing and proposed pattern of development in the immediate vicinity of the site.

-4-

Section 6. Approval of Change of Zone. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby adopts Change of Zone No. 23007, and rezones approximately 9 acres of real property located north of Mission Boulevard between Camino Real and Soto Avenue (APNs: 174-160-003, 174 -160-010, 174 -180-021, and 174-150-002) from Limited Agriculture (A-1) to General Commercial (C -1/C-P) as depicted in Exhibit “A,” and directs the City Manager to revise the official City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Map to designate the property as being in this new zone.

Section 7. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 8. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside incorporated by the City of Jurupa Val ley that may in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.

Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 21st day of December, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-5-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -18 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of December, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of December, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 21st day of December, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

A-1

EXHIBIT “A”
CZ 23007 Change of Zone from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to C-1/C-P (General Commercial) Assessor Parcel Numbers: 174-160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, 174-150-022 Existing Zoning

A-2

Exhibit A (Continued)
Proposed Zoning

6 EXHIBIT “A”
CZ 23007 Change of Zone from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to C-1/C-P (General Commercial) Assessor Parcel Numbers: 174-160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, 174-150-022 Existing Zoning

7 Exhibit A (Continued)
Proposed Zoning

ATTACHMENT 2
Planning Commission Resolution 2023-19
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-19

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY RECOMMENDING THAT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUP A VALLEY

APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP (CZ 23007) CHANGING
THE WNE OF APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES OF REAL

PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF MISSION

BOULEY ARD BETWEEN CAMINO REAL AND SOTO
A VENUE (APNS: 174-160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, AND 174-150-022) FROM LIMITED AGRICULTURE (A-1) TO
GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-1/C-P) AND DETERMINE

THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS

REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RE SOL VE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. The adoption included 21 amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map that addressed land use issues, including providing additional commercial and residential uses and buffering residential development from industrial uses. By law, a city's zoning must be consistent with its General Plan. Many of the 21 Land Use Map changes resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the General Plan. The owner of Crown Ace Hard ware retail business at 73 51 Mission Boulevard discussed an expansion of the business with members of the Community Development Department. During that discussion, it became apparent that reinvestment into the prope1ty would not be possible due to the inconsistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Map. Two neighboring sites have the same conflicting General Plan and Zoning Map designations The City Council initiated a zone change to rezone approximately 9 acres ofreal property located north of Mission Boulevard between Camino Real and Soto Avenue (the "Project") (APNs: 174- 160-003, 174-160-010, 174-180-021, and 174-150-022) from Limited Agriculture (A-1) to General Commercial (C-1/C-P) as depicted in Exhibit "A" so that the zoning map and General Plan Land Use Map are consistent for these properties.

Section 2. Change of Zone.
(a) The City is not required to initiate a Change of Zone but is required to have consistency between its General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map and therefore proposes to change the zoning for the real property as follows:

I) Two parcels of approxiniately 3 .4 acres of real property located at the northeast comer of Mission Boulevard and Camino Real (APNs: 174-160-003, 174-160-010)

Chair Shultz, Chair Pre Tem Newman and Commissioner
Villagomez
Commissioner Jackson and Pruitt

CZ23007: Existing A-1 Zoning
Ll'OArt:n;,..t�.)
-�.--i:- -•►1 -•l-• c:::l"' mi-, -·· o .. -. □- -- C::,k:. o .. --- -••tn ... J .. O•• a::a--,,.-1 c:::i-- C)oa .... t;;;JH c:, ... _ Cl•• □<o- -•1><1 ..... u me.. Cl-< C!:I...., □••Jrwt c:::I•> ow c:::J ... Oa.1 l::)"-w..,• -'"-II ... t;;;Ju o- o- CJI► .. c;:J•-- c;:,,. i;:;;J•• i;;;i ..... l'.,r.jr>g -�· □�• c::J�• c::i-, o�, ou c::J•►-.:. t::)1-4,& c::Ju1I -·· ..., rz1., c;:JJ• D•ac c:J"-••- o» ... -� c:::JM-il a)u .., . ..:,..... 1:::1•• c::J.a.M:.&. □,,_ c::]UIIM8 -·· C::,a..J1,1J EXHIBIT A (Continued)

ATTACHMENT 3
California Environmental Quality Act
Environmental Review Determination
Previous Environmental Document (PED)
Review Determination
Rezone of Properties
Master Application (MA) 23102
Change of Zone (CZ) 23007
Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8390 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Tamara Campbell, Principal Planner
(951) 332-6464
[email protected]
August 28, 2023
CZ23007

Page 1 ends

1.0 DETERMINATION
On the basis of the evaluation in Section 3.0 of this document, I find that all potentially si gnificant effects have been avoided or mitigated according to the, City of Jurupa Valley, 2017 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025 (FEIR) certified by Resolution No 2017-14 on September 7, 2017. Therefore, the Project is “within the scope” of the previously certified EIR. According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, CEQA does not require the preparation of any further environmental review.

City of Jurupa Valley
Signature Agency
Joe Perez, Community Development Director August 28, 2023 Printed Name/Title Date

CZ23007

Page 2 ends

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Document Purpose
This document is a Previous Environmental Document (PED) Review Determination prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including all criteria, standards, and procedures of CEQA (California Public Resource Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.).

This document has been prepared to determine if the zone changes (Project) are within the scope of the analysis contained in City of Jurupa Valley, 2017 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2016021025 certified by the City Council on September 17, 2017, and to ensure that the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.

2.2 Project Description
On September 7, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan as well as limited changes to the Zoning Map and Ordinance. The adoption included amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map that addressed land use issues, including providing additional commercial and residential uses and buffering residential development from industrial uses. By law, a city’s zoning must be consistent with its General Plan. Many of the Land Use Map changes resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the General Plan.

The Project
includes 3 sites identified within the Land Use Designation CR (Commercial Retail) where the current zoning is inconsistent with the land use. Master Application (MA) 23102 and Change of Zone (CZ) 23007 are proposed in an effort to correct the inconsistencies with the General Plan Land Use Designations. Each of these sites are described on pps. 3 through 5 below.

CZ23007

Page 3 ends

Land Use Site A, CZ23007
Site A – CZ22007 – Mission Blvd & Camino Real
Site A – CZ22007 is an approximately 3.4-acres undeveloped area near the northeast intersection of Mission Boulevard and Camino Real, south of State Route (SR) 60 and includes APNs 174-160-001 and -003. The site is currently zoned A-1 (Limited Agriculture) and with the adoption of the 2017 General Plan, the City designated the land use of the site as CR (Commercial Retail). As both parcels included in Site A are currently zoned as A-1 the zoning is inconsistent with the 2017 General Plan CR designation for the site. The zoning category that best fits the intent and purpose of the CR (Commercial Retail).

Land Use Designation is the C-1/C-P (General Commercial) zone.

General Plan Land Use Existing Zoning Recommended Zoning CR (Commercial Retail) A-1 (Limited Agriculture) C-1/C-P (General Commercial)

CZ23007

Page 4 ends

Land Use Site B, CZ23007
Site B - CZ23007 – Mission Blvd & Byrne Road
Site B - CZ23007 is an approximately 1.55 -acre parcel developed as an Ace Hardware Store and associated parking lot near the northwest intersection of Mission Boulevard and Byrne Road, South of State Route (SR) 60 and includes APN 174-180-021. The site is currently zoned A-1 (Limited Agriculture) and with the adoption of the 2017 General Plan, the City designated the land use of the site as CR (Commercial Retail). As the parcel included in Site B is currently zoned as A-1 the zoning is inconsistent with the 2017 General Plan CR designation for the site. The zoning category that best fits the intent and purpose of the CR (Commercial Retail). Land Use Designation is the C-1/C-P (General Commercial) zone.

General Plan Land Use Existing Zoning Recommended Zoning CR (Commercial Retail) A-1 (Limited Agriculture) C-1/C-P (General Commercial)

CZ23007

Page 5 ends

Land Use Site C, CZ23007
Site C - CZ23007 – Mission Blvd. & Byrne Road Site C - CZ23007 is an approximately 4.22 -acre parcel undeveloped near the northeast intersection of Mission Boulevard and Byrne Road, South of State Route (SR) 60 and includes APN 174-150-022. The site is currently zoned A-1 (Limited Agriculture) and with the adoption of the 2017 General Plan, the City designated the land use of the site as CR (Commercial Retail). As the parcel included in Site B is currently zoned as A-1 the zoning is inconsistent with the 2017 General Plan CR designation for the site. The zoning category that best fits the intent and purpose of the CR (Commercial Retail). Land Use Designation is the C-1/C-P (General Commercial) zone. General Plan Land Use Existing Zoning Recommended Zoning CR (Commercial Retail) A-1 (Limited Agriculture) C-1/C-P (General Commercial)

CZ23007

Page 6 ends

3.0 ANALYSIS
Applicability of the 2017 Certified FEIR
If the zone changes are approved, the Project will incorporate the following as required by the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the 2017 General Plan FEIR:
§ Plans, Policies, or Programs - These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project-based on federal, state, or local law currently in place, which effectively reduce environmental impacts.
§ Mitigation Measures (MM) - These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the provisions of CEQA.

3.1 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts
The 2017 General Plan FEIR determined that the following impacts were significant and unavoidable for:

Agriculture
Conversion of Agricultural Land. Development in the City will eventually convert 2,500 acres of land currently used for agriculture to suburban land uses.

Loss of Prime Farmland. Development in the City will eventually cover over 612 acres of prime farmland and 2,077 acres of locally important farmland.

Cumulative Loss of Agriculture . Buildout of the City to rural and suburban uses will contribute to an overall decline and eventual loss of agricultural activities and resources from western Riverside County.

Air Quality
Violate Air Quality Standards. Long-term emissions from the operation of developed land uses in the future will exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds for ROC, NOx, CO, PM 10, and PM 2.5 even with implementation of the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan and compliance with existing air pollution regulations.

Noise
Long-term Levels Exceedance of City Noise Standards. Future development in the City will contribute additional traffic which will cause noise levels along several major roadways to exceed City standards.

Cumulative Noise Impacts. Noise from traffic increases on local streets will contribute to cumulative noise impacts in the region as development occurs in the future.

3.2 Findings
The following sections evaluate the Project against each of the criteria to determine if the impacts of the 2017 General Plan and 2017 General Plan FEIR have new, increased or unidentified significant effects:

CZ23007

Page 7 ends

(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect.

Finding: The General Plan only dealt with establishing land use designations, and not the zoning classifications that would be used to implement the General Plan/ therefore, the Project is not making any changes to the General Plan land use designations that were not previously analyzed in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. The changes to the zoning do not create substantial changes, require major revisions, or involve new significant environmental impacts beyond those previously identified. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
Finding: All Sites A, and C - CZ23007 are vacant disturbed parcels, whereas Site B is an existing commercially developed parcel. The Project does not propose any new development to occur on any of the areas. The changes in zoning are to correct inconsistencies, conform with the existing 2017 General Plan and FEIR. Therefore, the zone changes will not create new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration.

Finding: None of the areas are being used for agriculture. Additionally, all three sites are designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” by the State Department of Conservation

1. As such, the Project site does
not contain any lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the State Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. In addition, no properties abutting the Project site are classified as Farmland. According to the County of Riverside, the site is not within an agricultural preserve. 2 As such the Project will not result in the loss of agricultural land.

No development is proposed therefore, the Project will not result in impacts to Air Quality and Noise that are substantially more severe or have significant effects than were analyzed or not previously addressed in the 2017 General Plan FEIR.
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR.

Finding: None of the areas are being used for agriculture and as such the Project will not result in the loss that were not previously addressed in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. No development is proposed as part of the Project therefore, the Project will not result in Agricultural, Air Quality, or Noise impacts 1California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, https://databasin.org/datasets/b83ea1952fea44ac9fc62c60dd57fe48 , accessed August 27, 2023. 2 California Department of Conservation Riverside County Important Farmland Data Availability, Important Farmland Maps Riverside West 2018, https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Riverside.aspx, accessed April 29, 2023.

CZ23007

Page 8 ends

that are substantially more severe than were analyzed or addressed previously in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Finding: Certain impacts to the environmental categories analyzed in the 2017 General Plan FEIR, including cultural resources, geological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and hydrology and water quality were found to be potentially significant, but could be mitigated to a less-than-significant level with implementation of policies contained in the General Plan. There are no mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found not feasible that would now be feasible through the zone changes on the areas. Future development on any of the areas will be subject to the existing applicable 2017 General Plan policies. Therefore, there are no additional mitigation measures required than those contained in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Finding: Certain impacts to the environmental categories analyzed in the 2017 General Plan FEIR, including cultural resources, geological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and hydrology and water quality were found to be potentially significant, but could be mitigated to a less-than-significant level with implementation of policies contained in the 2017 General Plan. Future development on any of the areas will be subject to the existing applicable 2017 General Plan policies. Therefore, there are no additional mitigation measures required than are considerably different than those contained in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. 4.0 Conclusion: The Project is required to comply with existing PPPs and MMs per Resolution Number 2017-14 certifying the 2017 General Plan FEIR. Based on the Review Process and the Planning Department Staff Report the zone changes would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR. The effects associated with the zone changes would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved 2017 General Plan FEIR, and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the 2017 General Plan FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified in the 2017 General Plan FEIR, thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental Review is required.

ATTACHMENT 4 Municipal Code Chapter 9.175 (A-1) Light Agriculture Title 9 - PLANNING AND ZONING
CHAPTER 9.175. A-1 ZONE (LIGHT AGRICULTURE)
Jurupa Valley, California, Municipal Code Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:23 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17)

Page 1 of 4 ends

CHAPTER 9.175. A-1 ZONE (LIGHT AGRICULTURE)
Sec. 9.175.010. Scope.

The provisions of this chapter shall apply in all A-1 Zones.

Sec. 9.175.020. Uses permitted.

A. The following uses shall be permitted:
(1) One (1) family dwellings.
(2) Water works facilities, both public and private, intended primarily for the production and distribution of water for irrigation purposes.
(3) Nurseries, greenhouses, orchards, aviaries, apiaries, field crops, tree crops, berry and bush crops, vegetable, flower and herb gardening on a commercial scale; the drying, packing, canning, freezing and
other accepted methods of processing the produce resulting from such permitted uses, when such processing is primarily in conjunction with a farming operation and further provided that the permanent buildings and structures used in conjunction with such drying, packing and processing operations are not nearer than twenty (20) feet from the boundaries of the premises. (4) The grazing of cattle, horses, sheep, goats or other farm stock or animals, not including hogs, including the supplementary feeding thereof, not to exceed five (5) animals per acre of all the land available; provided however, the systematic rotation of animals with more than five (5) animals per acre is permitted so long as the total number of permitted animals is not exceeded. For the grazing of sheep or goats, the permissible number of animals per acre may be multiplied by three, except that there shall be no limit to the permissible number of sheep which may be grazed per acre when the grazing is for the purpose of cleaning up unharvested crops, provided that such grazing is not conducted for more than four (4) weeks in any six (6) month period. The provisions of this subsection apply to mature breeding stock, maintenance stock and similar farm stock, and shall not apply to the offspring thereof, if such offspring are being kept, fed or maintained solely for sale, marketing or slaughtering at the earliest practical age of maturity. In all cases the permissible number of animals per acre shall b e
computed upon the basis of the nearest equivalent ratio. (5) Farms for rabbits, fish, frogs, chinchilla, or other small animals (excluding crowing fowl). (6) Farms or establishment for the selective or experimental breeding and raising of cattle, sheep, goats, and horses, subject to the limitations set forth in subsection (A)(4) of this section. (7) The noncommercial raising of hogs, not to exceed five (5) animals; provided, however, that the total number of animals permitted on parcels of less than one (1) acre shall not exceed two (2) animals except that no animals shall be permitted on lots of less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet .

For the purposes of determining the number of hogs on a parcel, both weaned and unweaned hogs shall be counted. (See Chapter 6.50 regarding hog ranches.) (8) Future Farmers of America (FFA) or 4-H projects conducted by the occupants of the premises.

Provided, however, if the project involves crowing fowl, an unexpired crowing fowl affidavit form describing the project must be on file with the Community Development Director. Affidavit forms are available at the Planning Department and may be filed free of charge.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:23 [EST]
( Supp. No. 17)

Page 2 of 4 ends

(9) A temporary stand for the display and sale of the agriculture produce of any permitted use that is produced upon the premises where such stand is located or upon contiguous lands owned or leased by the owner or occupant of the premises. Off-street parking shall be as required in Section 9.240.120, except that no paving shall be required.
(10) A sign, single or double faced, not exceeding twelve (12) square feet in area per face, advertising only the sale of the services or the products produced on the premises. The sign shall not be lighted or have flashing objects or banners.
(11) Public parks and playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways, and country clubs. (12) Home occupations.
(13) The keeping or raising of not more than twelve (12) mature female crowing fowl on lots or parcels between twenty thousand (20,000) square feet and thirty-nine thousand, nine hundred and ninety- nine (39,999) square feet or not more than fifty (50) mature female crowing fowl and ten (10) mature male crowing fowl on lots of forty thousand (40,000) square feet or more for the use of the occupants of the premises. The crowing fowl shall be kept in an enclosed area located not less than twenty (20) feet from any property line and not less than fifty (50) feet from any residence and shall be maintaine d
on the rear portion of the lot in conjunction with a residential use. (14) Kennels and catteries are permitted provided they are approved pursuant to the provisions of Section

9.240.460.
(15) Mining operation that is subject to the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (Pub.

Resources Code Section 2710 et seq.) is a permitted provided that the operator thereof holds a permit to conduct surface mining operations issued pursuant to Chapter 5.65, which has not been revoked o r
suspended.
(16) The noncommercial raising of not more than five (5) miniature pigs on lots of not less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, subject to the following conditions:
(a) Any person owning or having custody or control of a miniature pig over the age of four (4) months shall pay for and obtain a license from the Riverside County Department of Animal Services.
(b) Any miniature pig kept or maintained on a lot with a use permitted under Section 9.175.020(A)(1) shall be spayed or neutered as a condition of being licensed. No license shall be issued unless the owner or custodian of the miniature pig presents a valid certificate from a veterinarian. All unaltered miniature pigs shall be subject to immediate impoundment. (c) No miniature pig may weigh more than two hundred (200) pounds. (d) Any person owning or having charge, care, custody or control of any miniature pig shall keep such pig exclusively upon his or her own premises, provided, however, such pig may be off such premises if under restraint of a competent person.
(e) The miniature pig must be kept in an enclosure that is no closer than thirty (30) feet from the front property line, fifteen (15) feet from any side or rear property line and no closer than thirty- five (35) feet of any dwelling unit other than the dwelling unit on the subject lot .
(17) Outside storage of materials, such as irrigation equipment and farming machinery, is allowed provided the materials are used in conjunction with a farm. Otherwise, the amount of outside storage of materials is limited to one hundred (100) square feet with a maximum height of three (3) feet on parcels less than one-half (½) acre and two hundred (200) square feet with a maximum height of three (3) feet for parcels of one-half (½) acre or more.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:23 [EST]
( Supp. No. 17)

Page 3 of 4 ends

B. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a site development permit pursuant to Section

9.240.330. The site development permit approval may include conditions requiring fencing and landscaping of the parcel to assure that the use is compatible with the surrounding area. (1) Fraternal lodge halls, including grange halls.
(2) Churches, temples, or other structures used primarily for religious worship. (3) Private schools.
(4) Libraries.
(5) Public utility facilities.
(6) A permanent stand for the display and sale of the agriculture product of any permitted use that is produced upon the premises where such stand is located or upon contiguous lands owned or leased by the owner or occupant of the premises.
(7) An additional one (1) family dwelling (including mobilehomes), excluding the principal dwelling, shall be allowed for each ten (10) acres gross being farmed. Said additional dwelling units shall be located on
a parcel being farmed and occupied by the owner, operator or employee of the farming operation as a one (1) family residence provided that:
(a) The dwellings are not rented or held out for lease. (b) The dwellings are located not less than fifty (50) feet from any property line. (c) The dwellings are screened from view from the front property line by shrubs or trees. (d) The arrangement of the dwellings, sanitary facilities and utilities conforms with all of the requirements of the Riverside County of Department Environmental Health, the City Building and Safety Division and state law.
(e) The number of dwellings for employees shall not exceed four (4) per established farming operation.
(8) Beauty shops, including beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two (2) square feet in area. (9) Real estate offices, including temporary real estate tract offices, located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of two (2) years in any event.
(10) Winery and appurtenant and incidental uses with established on-site vineyard. (11) Feed and grain sales.
(12) Child day care center.

C. The following uses are permitted, provided a conditional use permit is granted:
(1) Any mining operation which is exempt from the provisions of the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (Pub. Resources Code Section 2710 et seq.) and Chapter 5.65. (2) Community auction and sales yards.
(3) Farm labor camp.
(4) Packaged dry fertilizer storage, not including processing. (5) Menageries.
(6) Oil production, not including refining or processing.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:23 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17) Page 4 of 4 (7) Mink farms. (8) Commercial stables and riding academies. (9) Commercial breeding operations. (10) Mobilehome parks, developed pursuant to Section 9.260.020. (11) Golf courses with standard length fairways and country clubs, fraternal lodges and wineries (including appurtenant and incidental uses with an established on-site winery) with the sale of alcoholic beverage sales for on-premises consumption, and wineries with the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.490. D. Any use that is not specifically listed in subsections A. and B. of this section may be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the category in which it falls. E. Subject to the provisions of Section 9.240.300, the number of mature crowing fowl may be increased up to fifty (50) percent over each (male and female) of the permitted numbers. (Ord. No. 2012-02, § 1, 6-7-2012; Ord. No. 2021-09 , § 4, 4-15-2021; Ord. No. 2021-21 , § 43, 11-4-2021) Sec. 9.175.030. Development standards. A. Lot size shall not be less than 20,000 square feet, with a minimum average lot width of one hundred (100) feet and a minimum average lot depth of one hundred and fifty (150) feet, unless larger minimum lot area and dimensions are specified for a particular area or use. B. Minimum yard requirements shall be twenty (20) feet front yard, five (5) feet side yard, and ten (10) feet rear yard. C. One (1) family residences shall not exceed forty (40) feet in height. No other building or structure shall exceed fifty (50) feet in height, unless a greater height is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.370. In no event, however, shall a building exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height or any other structure exceed one hundred and five (105) feet in height, unless a variance is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.270. D. Animals on existing lots less than one hundred (100) feet in width. If the average lot width of an existing lot is less than one hundred (100) feet, animals shall be kept a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from the principal street frontage. If such lot is a corner lot, animals shall also be kept not less than twenty (20) feet from the rear lot line. For purposes of this section, the principal street frontage is the street frontage with the shortest dimension. E. Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 9.240.120.

ATTACHMENT 5 Municipal Code Chapter 9.115 (C-1/C-P Zone) Title 9 - PLANNING AND ZONING CHAPTER 9.115. C-1 ZONE/C-P ZONE (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) Jurupa Valley, California, Municipal Code Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17) Page 1 of 6 CHAPTER 9.115. C-1 ZONE/C-P ZONE (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) Sec. 9.115.010. Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall apply in all C-1 Zones and C-P Zones. Sec. 9.115.020. Uses permitted. A. The following uses are permitted, only in enclosed buildings with not more than two hundred (200) square feet of outside storage or display of materials appurtenant to such use, provided a site development permit shall have been approved pursuant to provisions of Section 9.240.330: (1) Ambulance services. (2) Antique shops. (3) Appliance stores, household. (4) Art supply shops and studios. (5) Auction houses. (6) Auditoriums and conference rooms. (7) Automobile repair garages, not including body and fender shops or spray painting. (8) Automobile parts and supply stores. (9) Bakery goods distributors. (10) Bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to retail sales on the premises. (11) Banks and financial institutions. (12) Barber and beauty shops. (13) Billiard and pool halls. (14) Blueprint and duplicating services. (15) Book stores and binders. (16) Bowling alleys. (17) Catering services. (18) Cleaning and dyeing shops. (19) Clothing stores. (20) Confectionery or candy stores. (21) Costume design studios. (22) Dance halls. (23) Delicatessens. (24) Department stores.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST]
( Supp. No. 17)

Page 2 of 6 ends

(25) Drug stores.
(26) Dry goods stores.
(27) Employment agencies.
(28) Escort bureaus.
(29) Feed and grain sales.
(30) Florists shops.
(31) Food markets and frozen food lockers.
(32) Gift shops.
(33) Hotels, resort hotels and motels.
(34) Household goods sales, including, but not limited to, new and used appliances, furniture, carpets, draperies, lamps, radios, and television sets, including repair thereof. (35) Hobby shops.
(36) Ice cream shops.
(37) Ice sales, not including ice plants.
(38) Interior decorating shops.
(39) Jewelry stores, including incidental repairs.
(40) Labor temples.
(41) Laboratories, film, dental, medical, research or testing. (42) Laundries and laundromats.
(43) Leather goods stores.
(44) Locksmith shops.
(45) Mail order businesses.
(46) Manufacturer's agent.
(47 Market, food, wholesale or jobber.
(48) Massage parlors, Turkish baths, health centers and similar personal service establishments. (49) Meat markets, not including slaughtering.
(50) Mimeographing and addressograph services.
(51) Mortuaries.
(52) Music stores.
(53) News stores.
(54) Notions or novelty stores.
(55) Offices, including business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, community planning, real estate.
(56) One (1) on-site operator's residence, which may be located in a commercial building. (57) Paint and wallpaper stores, not including paint contractors.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17) Page 3 of 6 (58) Pawn shops. (59) Pet shops and pet supply shops. (60) Photography shops and studios and photo engraving. (61) Plumbing shops, not including plumbing contractors. (62) Poultry markets, not including slaughtering or live sales. (63) Printers or publishers. (64) Produce markets. (65) Radio and television broadcasting studios. (66) Recording studios. (67) Refreshment stands. (68) Restaurants and other eating establishments. (69) Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama, music and swimming. (70) Shoe stores and repair shops. (71) Shoeshine stands. (72) Signs, on-site advertising. (73) Sporting goods stores. (74) Stained glass assembly. (75) Stationer stores. (76) Stations, bus, railroad and taxi. (77) Taxidermist. (78) Tailor shops. (79) Telephone exchanges. (80) Theaters, not including drive-ins. (81) Tire sales and service, not including recapping. (82) Tobacco shops. (83) Tourist information centers. (84) Toy shops. (85) Travel agencies. (86) Typewriter sales and rental, including incidental repairs. (87) Watch repair shops. (88) Wholesale businesses with samples on the premises but not including storage. (89) Car washes. (90) Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity. (91) Recycling collection facilities.

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17) Page 4 of 6 (92) Convenience stores, not including the sale of motor vehicle fuel. (93) Day care centers. B. The following uses are permitted, together with outside storage and display of materials appurtenant to such use, provided a site development permit has been approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330: (1) Bicycle sales and rentals. (2) Boat and other marine sales. (3) Ceramic sales and manufacturing for on-site sales, provided the total volume of kiln space does not exceed sixteen (16) cubic feet. (4) Electrical substations. (5) Equipment rental services, including rototillers, power mowers, sanders, power saws, cement and plaster mixers not exceeding ten (10) cubic feet in capacity and other similar equipment. (6) Fishing and casting pools. (7) Golf cart sales and service. (8) Hardware stores, including not more than one thousand (1,000) square feet of outside storage lumber. (9) Liquid petroleum service stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine, provided the total capacity of all tanks shall not exceed ten thousand (10,000) gallons, excluding truck stops/travel centers. (10) Mobilehomes, provided they are kept mobile and licensed pursuant to state law, used for: (a) Sales offices on mobilehome sales lots. (b) Construction offices and caretaker's quarters on construction sites for the duration of a valid building permit, provided they are inconspicuously located. (c) Caretakers or watchmen and their families, provided no rent is paid, where a permitted and existing commercial use is established. Not more than one (1) mobilehome shall be allowed for a parcel of land or a shopping center complex. (11) Mobilehome sales and storage, trailer sales and rental house trailers. (12) Nurseries and garden supply stores. (13) Parking lots and parking structures. (14) Sports and recreational facilities, not including motor driven vehicles and riding academies, but including archery ranges, athletic playgrounds, sports arenas, skating rinks, stadiums, and commercial swimming pools. (15) Churches, temples, and other places of religious worship. (16) Trailer and boat storage. (17) Trucks and trailers; the rental of trucks not over nineteen thousand, five hundred (19,500) pounds gross vehicle weight, with body not to exceed twenty-two (22) feet in length from the back of the cab to the end of body; and the rental of trailers not exceeding six (6) feet in width or twenty-two (22) feet in length. (18) Truck sales and service. C. The following uses are permitted, provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.280:

Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST] ( Supp. No. 17) Page 5 of 6 (1) Sale, rental, repair, or demonstration of motorcycles, scooters, and motorbikes. (2) Drive-in theaters. (3) Heliports. (4) Tire recapping. (5) Animal hospitals. (6) Body and fender shops and spray painting. (7) Swap meets. (8) All uses permitted in subsection A. of this section that have more than two hundred (200) square feet of outside storage or display of materials. (9) Mini-warehouse structures. (10) Lumber yards, including only incidental mill work. (11) Building materials sales yards. (12) Underground bulk fuel storage. (13) Congregate care residential facilities. (14) Convenience stores, including the sale of motor vehicle fuel pursuant to Section 9.240.490. (15) Automobile fueling stations with or without the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption pursuant to Section 9.240.490, excluding truck stops/travel centers. (16) Liquor stores pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.490 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales). (17) Automobile sales and rental agencies. (18) Alcoholic beverage sales for on-premises or off-premises consumption in conjunction with billiard and pool halls, bowling alleys, dance halls, hotels, resort hotels, markets, convenience stores, restaurants, theaters (not drive-ins, and sports and recreational facilities; including motor driven vehicles, archery ranges, sports arenas, skating rinks, and stadiums) pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.490. D. The uses listed in subsections A., B. and C. of this section do not include sex-oriented businesses. E. Accessory uses. An accessory use to a permitted use is allowed provided the accessory use is incidental to, and does not alter the character of, the principal permitted use, including, but not limited to, limited manufacturing, fabricating, processing, packaging, treating and incidental storage related thereto, provided any such activity shall be in the same line of merchandise or service as the trade or service business conducted on the premises and provided any such activity does not exceed any of the following restrictions: (1) The maximum gross floor area of the building permitted to be devoted to such accessory use shall be twenty-five (25) percent. (2) The maximum total horsepower of all electric motors used in connection with such accessory use shall be five (5) horsepower. (3) The accessory use shall be so conducted that noise, vibration, dust, odor, and all other objectionable factors shall be reduced to the extent that there will be no annoyance to persons outside the premises. Such accessory use shall be located not nearer than fifty (50) feet to any residential zone. (4) Accessory uses shall be conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building. F. Any use that is not specifically listed in subsections A., B. and C. of this section may be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director finds that the Created: 2023-04-06 12:38:21 [EST]
( Supp. No. 17)

Page 6 of 6 ends

proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the category in which it falls.

G. It is the intent of the City Council that a legally established pre-existing land use of an occupied property shall not assume a nonconforming status as a result of the adoption of the 2017 General Plan and the concurrent or subsequent adoption of a change of zone for consistency with the 2017 General Plan. Any pre-existing use certified pursuant to Section [9.240.080] that is not specifically listed in subsections A., B., and D. shall be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use the same as provided for such use under the zoning classification of the subject property prior to the adoption of the new zoning classification concurrent with, or subsequent to, the effective date of City Council Resolution No. 2017-14[A1] adopting the 2017 General Plan. The expansion of significant modification of such a pre-existing use shall be subject to the approval process and zoning requirements that had governed the category of use in which it fell under the prior zoning classification. However, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to mean that a site development permit or conditional use permit is required to continue such pre-existing use. ( Ord. No. 2017-09 , § 8A., 9-21-2017; Ord. No. 2021-09 , § 4, 4-15-2021; Ord. No. 2021-21 , §§ 19—22, 11-4-2021; Ord. No. 2021-29 , §§ 12—15, 12-16-2021; Ord. No. 2022-24 , § 9, 12-15-2022) Sec. 9.115.030. Planned commercial developments.

Planned commercial developments are permitted provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provision of Title 7.

Sec. 9.115.040. Development standards.

The following standards of development are required in the C-1 and C-P Zones:
(1) There is no minimum lot area requirement, unless specifically required by zone classification for a particular area.
(2) There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height except as required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than two (2) feet for each foot by which the height exceeds thirty-five (35) feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line or from an existing adjacent street line, unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line.
(3) No building or structure shall exceed fifty (50) feet in height, unless a greater height is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.370. In no event, however, shall a building or structure exceed seventy-five (75
) feet in height, unless a variance is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.270. (4) Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 9.240.120. (5) All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a minimum sight distance of one thousand, three hundred and twenty (1,320) feet.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.A
REVIEW AND AWARD OF 2023 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANTS

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Counci l review the Community Service Grant (CSG) Committee recommendations for the 2023 CSG program and award funding to the first 12 applicants as indicated on the chart below in the amount of $52,000.

BACKGROUND
At the September 19, 2019 City Council m eeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019 -88 formalizing the CSG program, policies and procedures. The Resolution establishes the City’s purpose, guideline s, accountability measures and funding mechanism for the CSG program. It is the intent of the process to equitably distribute City resources to nonprofit organizations that provide programs and/or services to Jurupa Valley residents in a manner that ensures accountability, transparency, efficiency and self-sufficiency. Resolution 2019-88 “Community Service Grants Policy” is attached to the Staff Report.

Council does have the discretion per the adopted policy to review and make their recommendation for final funding or to allocate additional funding to provide more programs to the residents of Jurupa Valley.

ANALYSIS
As part of the Fiscal Year 2023 -2024 City Council budget adoption process, Council directed that $55,000 be allocated for the CSG program. This year, s taff received 19 applications from non -profit organizations in the amount of $87,000. Most of the applicants requested a $5,000 donation with a few asking for lessor amounts. As stated in the adopted CSG Policy, “ it is not the City’s intention to fund each request received” and “due to limited resources, not all requests can be funded.”

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

With the intent of formulating a staff recommendation for the City Council that meets the CSG policy guideline requirements and the policy mandate to fund “those organizations which most effectively serve the needs and improve the well -being of the residents of Jurupa Valley”, the City Manager convened a CSG Committee.

The CSG Committee consisted of the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Assistant to the City Manager , Principal Management Analyst , and the City’s Community Development Block Grant consultant. The CSG Committee met over a course of several meetings to review each of the CSG applications ensuring that all criteria outlined in the application met the City policy and guideline eligibility requirements.

In that all of the applicants meet the CSG criteria for funding, all represent valuable programs from reputable organizations , and collectively serve an extremely diverse clientele, the CSG Committee was confronted with the unenviable task of attempting to quantifiably compare and contrast, rank and recommend for funding these well deserving programs. In short, how do you equitably d etermine the value of funding a recreation program that serves children with mental health challenges above/below a program that restores and protects a natural habitat and water resource?

To assist in the recommendation determination process, the CSG Committee relied upon additional values that are rooted in the ado pted CSG policy and application. More specifically, during the deliberation process, the CSG Committee discussed at length each applicant’s position with regard to:

 The uniqueness of the services they are providing – are there other options in the community for residents to receive similar services?
 Need for the service – is there a demonstrated unmet need for the service?  Quantity of recipients – how many people will benefit directly and indir ectly from the funding?
 Quality/Depth of service – is the service provider benefiting fewer people in total but those that are served receive a much greater impact from the service?  Leveraging of funding – what other sources of funding are being “matched”?  Duplicate funding – does the applicant currently receive funding from the City in the form of General Fund appropriation, CDBG, past CSG funding, etc.?  Durability of award – is the funding purchasing something that will provide value over time or is it perishable?
 Applicant experience – what is the institutional “collateral” of the organization?

The 19 CSG applicants this year include 10 new requests, 2 returning CSG projects from 2021, and 7 requests from returning applicants from 2022. It is the recommendation of CSG Committee, that the following 12 applicants receive funding as outlined in the chart below.

Page | 3

City of Jurupa Valley
2023 Community Service Grants

Non-Profit/Program Name
Non-Profit
Requested
Budget
Central Del Inmigrante, Inc.
1 Filling the Technology Gap – education and outreach program to local community to supply 75 laptops to those underserved individuals that need technology education and training to connect them to jobs, resources. etc. JV only $5,000

2 Jurupa Citizens Patrol
Children’s Outreach Program – provide support to 30 -35 children who are in need of essential items such as shoes, clothing, supplies, backpacks, bicycles and more. Children are from the JUSD and the program works alongside the school’s SRO to assist those with most need. They will also host activity and event tables during the year to share resource and outreach information.
$5,000

YMCA – Corona/Norco serving Jurupa Valley
YMCA Literacy and Healthy Living Resource Fair to celebrate National March into Literacy Month they will hold a community fair that offers food, entertainment, free books, book bags, free produce and celebrate literacy and family engagement. Open to the public they anticipate at least 700 attendee’s with over 60 free volunteers involved with the project.

3 $5,000

Jurupa Valley Adopt a Family
Providing Annual Holiday Meals / Gifts – funding to supply food and resources to those in need identified by an application procedure.

Each family will receive 2 weeks of groceries to help with meals and food shortages along with toys for children in need. They also provide a community “parade” to accept donations of food/toys for the program but the need has become greater than the donations received.

4 $5,000
Page | 4

Animal Solutions Konnection Foundation
Jurupa Valley Loves Animals Sculpture Project –
the project is to beautify Jurupa Valley while promoting animal welfare at the site of the VB Animal Services Campus. Funding will support the commission, purchase, installation of 3 to 4 sculptures created by a local metal fabricator artist as a colorful and serene tribute to the campus and residents of Jurupa Valley and to bring awareness to adoption of animals in need.
5 $5,000

PADRE Foundation
Diabetes Awareness, Treatment, Education Services/Classes, Support Groups Program – community outreach and education regarding Type 1 diabetes throughout JV is needed. PADRE will utilize grant funding to host 2 community education/awareness events that provide refreshments, materials, supplies, and education and prevention measures to approximately 100 individuals. 6 $1,000

7 ELLA Sports Foundation
ELLA Sports Sampling Clinics Program – funding will provide an opportunity for female youth to experience numerous sports activities by creating opportunities for ELLA to conduct sports related events, purchase materials and supplies, cover fees for field and sport locations. Additionally, they will provide community outreach and education about college and sports options for female athletes. $5,000

Men in Transition Fresh Start Program
Education and Outreach for Job Development – program to provide job education and life skills to individuals who have recently been release from incarceration. Funding will assist with education materials and supplies, classroom space and accommodations, along with meals and resources. Goal is to enhance opportunities to individuals to reduce re-incarceration objectives.
8 $4,000

Page | 5

9 Navy Silver Gridiron Club
JV High School Football and Cheer Program – funding will provide for meals, sporting and cheer equipment and gear, uniforms and football apparel. Goal is to provide healthy meals prior to each game, and purchase much needed gear for game practice and cheering needs. $2,000

10 Kidzcomefirst Food Pantry
Outreach and Food / Education Program – supply food and outreach services to those in need in Jurupa Valley. Currently they are seeking a location and resources to build their program. $5,000

Jurupa Mountains Discovery Center JMDC
Program Enhancements for Learning Recovery -
11 funding to support learning and education programs, field trips, materials and supplies for classroom and field education through a free science based learning program with hands on learning opportunities. 2021 CSG awardee $5,000

12 VFW Post 10267 Jurupa Valley
VFW Building and Property Enhancements – as a gathering place for JV Veterans and residents, the VFW serves many people and are in need of more space at their aging facility and need to enhance their patio area with furniture, fans, tables, chairs, and misting system.

This would allow for more outreach and community services for veterans and residents, as well as a space for other non-profits to provide services to the community.
2021 CSG awardee $5,000

TOTAL $53,000

*13

Rivers and Lands Conservancy
Connecting the JV Community with the SA River – on going project to beautify, care, and educate residents of JV about the SA River including field trips, materials, supplies (for clean-up days) graffiti abatement, interpretation signage, dog waste stations, and outreach materials.
2022 CSG awardee
$5,000

Page | 6

*14
3P’s Christian Ministries, Inc.

Pack the Backpack/Supplies Event – expected to serve over 500 children in JUSD with free backpacks containing school supplies and toiletries throughout the district. $5,000
2022 CSG awardee

*15
Tom Wathen Center
Red Barn Aviation Program – education program providing hands on training and experience in restoration projects of airplanes. Funding request for supplies, tools, education materials and to purchase a Portacool Evaporative cooling system to enhance ability for students to work year round in the hangar in a comfortable environment. $5,000 2022 CSG awardee

Queen of Hearts Therapeutic Riding Center, Inc.

Queen of Hearts Equine Therapy 2024 Program- $5,000
*16
Funding request is for materials, supplies and equine wellbeing feed/care to ensure the health and welfare of the horses within the program. Program utilizes horses as therapy to help those with disabilities, emotional /physical limitations and they offer therapies to veterans suffering from both PTSD and emotional coping abilities. 2022 CSG awardee

*17

Friends of the Jurupa Libraries
STEM Learning at the Louis Robidoux Library -
offering programs and education via STEM and the Little Explorers Ready and Play programs. Funding for materials, supplies, equipment to expand youth opportunities for learning about science, technology, electronics and mathematics in a fun hands on environment. 2022 CSG awardee

$5,000

*18

Jurupa Valley Rotary Club
Community Service Project Support – JV Rotary provides outreach, support, collaboration with other non-profit or agencies servicing those in need within the City of JV. Funding will be utilized to promote and assist with these activities as well as provide education and resources to those in need.
2022 CSG awardee

$5,000

Page | 7

*29

Jurupa Football and Cheer, Inc.

Youth Football Cheer Program – local youth through organized sporting programs is seeking funding to expand youth involvement in youth football and cheer programs in Jurupa Valley. Funding request to cover cost of field rentals, sporting/cheer equipment, uniforms to benefit 350 + students in the program.
2022 CSG awardee

$5,000

Total $87,000

All applicants meet the criteria for funding and are qualified under the guidelines of the CSG program to receive funding. The committee’s decision to recommend only 12 applicants is based on the limits of the Fiscal Year 2023 -24 budget appropriation and funding only those applicants that did not receive CSG funding in Fiscal Year 2022 -23.

While the guidelines do not prohibit an organization from receiving funding in consecutive program years, it was determined to be the only distinguishing objective crit eria the committee felt could be utilized to provide the City Council with an equitable recommendation.

Council has sole and complete discretion to make chan ges to the CSG Committee’s recommendation, add or remove applicants, and increase or decrease program funding.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The City Council approved $55,000 during the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 budget process to provide CSG grants up to $5,000 per applicant . The CSG Committee recommends awarding a total of $53,000 to 12 applicants. Should the City Cou ncil desire to increase funding for the CSG program, additional funds can be appropriated from the undesignated General Fund balance during the Mid-Year Budget process.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Award funding to the top applicants as recommended by the CSG Committee

2. Provide direction to the CSG Committee on an alternative ranking of applicants.

3. Increase funding to allow for additional CSG awards.

Jurupa Valley City CouncilDecember 7, 2023

Jurupa Valley City Council
December 7, 2023