Jurupa Valley City Council
January 16, 2025

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 C-1
Appendix C - Western Riverside County Traffic Growth 2018 – 2045

Existing (2018) and future (2045) traffic data were derived from RivCoM. The model area of coverage, level of roadway network and TAZ detail, and application on other regional transportation study efforts represented RivCoM as the appropriate tool for evaluating traffic growth as part of the Nexus Study.

The forecasts of existing and future congestion levels were derived from the Year 2018 Existing and Year 2045 No-Build scenarios, respectively. The 2018 Existing and 2045 No- Build scenarios were developed using RivCoM to model 2018 and 2045 SED, respectively, as derived from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS adopted SED forecasts, on the transportation network as it existed in 2021. The 2018 existing transportation network represents the most recent baseline network developed for RivCoM, and only reflects the inclusion of those projects that were funded, committed and under construction at that time, and therefore imminently to be part of the baseline transportation system in 2018. For the purposes of the TUMF network analysis, additional improvements on the TUMF arterial highway network that were either completed or under construction in the period between 2018 and December 2021 were added to the network to create a 2021 existing network. The 2021 existing network was subsequently modeled in RivCoM using both 2018 and 2045 SED to provide the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No-Build scenarios as the basis for comparison and analysis. The 2045 No-Build scenario did not include transportation improvements that are planned as part of the recently adopted SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS on the basis they are uncommitted (meaning that their implementation is dependent on securing future funding and approval). Inclusion of the uncommitted improvements masks the congestion effects of increasing travel. Inclusion of these improvements and the resultant masking is not appropriate for this analysis aimed at identifying the effects of increasing travel if improvements were not built.

The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from RivCoM for the purpose of calculating the following measures for Western Riverside County only. Traffic growth impacts for each of the two scenarios were calculated using the TransCAD platform.

 Total daily vehicle miles of travel (VMT),
 Total daily VMT on facilities experiencing LOS E or worse.  Total daily vehicle hours of travel (VHT), and
 Total combined daily vehicle hours of delay (VHD)

The following formulas were used to calculate the respective values.

 VMT = Link Distance * Total Daily Volume
 VHT = Average Loaded (Congested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume  VHD = VHT – (Free-flow (Uncongested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume)  VMT LOS E or F = VMT (on links where Daily V/C exceeded 0.90)13

13 LOS Thresholds for LOS E are based on the 2010 Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010) LOS Maximum V/C Criteria for Multilane Highways with 45 mph Free Flow Speed (Exhibit 14-5, Chapter 14, Page 14-5).

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 C-2
RivCoM breaks down its roadway network into functional categories called assignment groups. The measures were calculated selectively for all facilities, freeways only, arterials only, and TUMF arterials only by including and excluding different assignment groups and facilities. For the calculation of measures on “all facilities”, only the centroid connectors were excluded. Arterial values excluded all mixed-flow to carpool lane connector ramps, freeways, carpool lanes, centroid connectors, and freeway-to- freeway connector ramps, respectively. Freeways were defined as including mixed- flow to carpool lane connector ramps, freeways, carpool lanes, and freeway-to- freeway connector ramps, respectively.

The 2021 Existing Network by Facility Type is included in this Appendix as Exhibit C-1. The 2021 existing network was used as the basis for the 2018 Existing and 2045 No-Build scenarios by modeling 2018 and 2045 SED, respectively, on the 2021 existing network using RivCoM to determine the comparative effects of population, household an employment growth in the region. The results of the analysis of existing and future congestion levels are presented for peak periods in Exhibit C-2 and for daily in Exhibit C- 3 in this Appendix and extracted for the combined peak periods in Table 3.1 of the study report.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 C-4
EXHIBIT C-2

Western Riverside County
Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 - 2045) – Peak Periods

Measures of Performance
AM Peak PM Peak
2018 2045 % Change % Annual 2018 2045 % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 10,324,900 13,225,039 28% 0.9% 12,959,824 16,672,215 29% 0.9% VMT - FREEWAYS 5,877,972 6,720,682 14% 0.5% 7,636,550 8,769,602 15% 0.5% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 4,446,928 6,504,357 46% 1.4% 5,323,274 7,902,613 48% 1.5% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 2,793,846 3,826,810 37% 1.2% 3,423,139 4,770,390 39% 1.2% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 251,133 435,243 73% 2.1% 290,218 480,196 65% 1.9% VHT - FREEWAYS 120,257 186,102 55% 1.6% 143,535 213,027 48% 1.5% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 130,875 249,142 90% 2.4% 146,683 267,169 82% 2.2% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 81,578 154,106 89% 2.4% 92,877 166,763 80% 2.2% VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 57,989 177,814 207% 4.2% 50,911 160,242 215% 4.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 34,221 86,616 153% 3.5% 31,935 84,033 163% 3.6% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 23,768 91,198 284% 5.1% 18,977 76,209 302% 5.3% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 18,024 66,789 271% 5.0% 15,225 58,074 281% 5.1% VMT LOS E & F - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 2,960,551 6,364,419 115% 2.9% 2,644,519 7,005,063 165% 3.7% VMT LOS E & F - FREEWAYS 2,435,804 4,276,258 76% 2.1% 2,289,667 5,040,633 120% 3.0% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 524,747 2,088,161 298% 5.2% 354,852 1,964,430 454% 6.5% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E & F 448,168 1,585,571 254% 4.8% 317,614 1,598,561 403% 6.2% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E & F 16% 41%

9% 34%

* Based on RivCoM 2018 network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network completed.

NOTES:

Volume is adjusted by PCE factor
VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free-flow (ideal) travel time)
LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios).

LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 C-5
EXHIBIT C-3

Western Riverside County
Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 - 2045) – Daily

Measures of Performance
Peak Periods (Total) Daily
2018 2045 % Change % Annual 2018 2045 % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 28% 0.9% 41,378,907 53,832,389 30% 1.0% VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 15% 0.5% 24,642,357 29,200,582 18% 0.6% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 47% 1.4% 16,736,551 24,631,807 47% 1.4% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 38% 1.2% 10,794,415 15,170,125 41% 1.3% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 541,350 915,439 69% 2.0% 893,813 1,433,458 60% 1.8% VHT - FREEWAYS 263,792 399,128 51% 1.5% 440,073 637,990 45% 1.4% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 277,558 516,311 86% 2.3% 453,740 795,469 75% 2.1% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 174,455 320,869 84% 2.3% 285,520 496,757 74% 2.1% VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 108,900 338,056 210% 4.3% 131,965 410,511 211% 4.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 66,156 170,649 158% 3.6% 79,532 208,287 162% 3.6% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 42,745 167,407 292% 5.2% 52,434 202,223 286% 5.1% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 33,249 124,863 276% 5.0% 41,025 152,200 271% 5.0% VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 5,605,070 13,369,483 139% 3.3% 6,153,146 16,090,205 161% 3.6% VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,725,471 9,316,891 97% 2.5% 5,141,215 11,306,348 120% 3.0% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 879,599 4,052,592 361% 5.8% 1,011,931 4,783,858 373% 5.9% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 765,782 3,184,133 316% 5.4% 878,465 3,819,635 335% 5.6% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 12% 37%

8% 25%

* Based on RivCoM 2018 network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network completed.

NOTES:

Volume is adjusted by PCE factor
VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios).

LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 D-1
Appendix D - Western Riverside County Bus Transit System Ridership 2023 – 2045

Actual average weekday daily ridership for Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) transit bus services was tabulated for 2023. Forecast average weekday daily ridership for RTA bus transit services was retrieved from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model for horizon year 2045.

The bus transit ridership for 2023 and 2045 was tabulated to represent existing and future regional bus transit trips consistent with the analysis of highway trips described in Section

3.1 and Appendix C. Table D-1 summarizes the weekday bus transit ridership in Western Riverside County.

TABLE D-1 - Regional Bus Transit Weekday System Ridership

Year Western Riverside
Weekday Projected System Ridership
2023* 16,575
2045** 57,282

Notes: * - 2023 actual average weekday daily ridership provided by RTA staff December 1, 2023
** - 2045 forecast average weekday daily ridership obtained from SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model as provided by Fehr and
Peers, November 28, 2023

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 E-1
Appendix E - Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials Performance Measures

An integral element of the Nexus Study is the designation of the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials (also referred to as the “TUMF Network”). This network of regionally significant highways represents those arterial and collector highway and roadway facilities that primarily support inter-community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional freeway system, and represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The Regional System of Highways and Arterials does NOT include the freeways of Western Riverside County which primarily serve inter-regional trips.

The designation of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in the original TUMF Nexus Study adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in October 2002 was initiated with the identification of highways and roadways that met certain specified guidelines as defined by the WRCOG Public Works Committee. The guidelines are defined in Section 4.1 of the Nexus Report, and include:

1. Arterial highway facilities proposed to have a minimum of four lanes at future buildout (not including freeways).

2. Facilities that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities both within and adjoining Western Riverside County.

3. Facilities with forecast traffic volumes in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day in the future horizon year.

4. Facilities with forecast volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 (LOS E) or greater in the future horizon year.

5. Facilities that accommodate regional fixed route transit services.

6. Facilities that provide direct access to major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi-modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers).

The original candidate facilities were identified by overlaying various transportation system and land use plots depicting parameters consistent with those defined by the specified guidelines. These plots included existing and proposed numbers of lanes, network volumes and volume to capacity ratio (LOS) derived from SCAG CTP Model networks developed by Transcore to support the ongoing Western Riverside County CETAP study, and existing land use information provided by SCAG. These plots were included in the Appendices that accompanied the original 2002 TUMF Nexus Study.

Fixed route transit service information was provided by the Riverside County Regional Transportation Authority (RTA).

These various data inputs were overlaid and reviewed leading the definition of a segmented skeletal network of highways and roadways for further consideration. The skeletal network was further enhanced to reflect regional connectivity and access to activity center considerations. An initial draft Regional System of Highways and Arterials was developed and subsequently distributed to the County of Riverside and each City in Western Riverside County for review in the context of their respective City General

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 E-2
Plan Circulation Elements, primarily to confirm existing and future number of lanes and appropriateness of the facilities identified. The initial draft network was subsequently revised to consolidate appropriate General Plan Circulation Elements, including the identification of proposed new facilities as alternatives to existing facilities. It should be pointed out that the Regional System of Highways and Arterials does not represent a simple compilation of regional General Plan Circulation Elements, but rather incorporates the elements of regional General Plan Circulation Elements that are necessary for mitigating the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development within the horizon year of the TUMF program.

The consolidated list of proposed network improvements (along with associated initial cost estimates) was subsequently distributed to each of the WRCOG jurisdictions, individual landowners, and other stakeholders including representatives of the development community through the Building Industry Association (BIA) for review. The review of the consolidated list of improvements (and associated costs) prompted a series of five peer review workshop meetings to specifically review each segment of roadway identified and the associated improvements to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development. One peer review workshop meeting was held for each of the five zones in the WRCOG region with meetings held at the Riverside County Assessor’s Office between June 27, 2002 and July 18, 2002. The peer review workshop meetings involved representatives from WRCOG, the respective zone jurisdictions and the BIA.

The peer review workshops culminated in the development (by consensus of the groups) of a revised list of proposed network improvements (and associated costs) more accurately reflecting the improvements necessary to mitigate the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development.

Following the peer review, the initial Regional System of Highways and Arterials was reviewed and endorsed by the TUMF Technical Advisory Committee, the TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee and utilized as the basis for developing the original TUMF Nexus Study in October 2002.

For the 2024 update of the TUMF Nexus Study, the Regional System of Highways and Arterials was reassessed. Consistent with the changing rate of new development forecast for Western Riverside County as part of the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS, including reductions in the overall level of non-residential employment, the review of the TUMF Network as part of the 2024 Nexus Update ensured facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process involved the comparison of model outputs for the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No-Build Scenarios on the 2021 Existing arterial network to identify those facilities no longer expected to be impacted substantially by the cumulative effects of traffic growth from new development. This review resulted in various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements previously identified on the TUMF Network. The updated model output plots utilized as the basis for the latest network review are included in this appendix as Exhibit E-1 through E-8 .

The Regional System of Highways and Arterials is included as Figure 4.1 in the Nexus Study report.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-1
Appendix F - TUMF Network Cost Assumptions

The TUMF program was established as a uniform impact fee program that is applied to mitigate the cumulative transportation impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system. In establishing the technical basis for TUMF, like any impact fee program, there are two fundamental requirements that must be addressed: establishing a rational nexus for the program; and determining that any fee is roughly proportional to the impact of a proposed development. These requirements are rooted in two well- known legal cases: Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) 483 U.S. 825; and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374.

To establish project costs that meet the rough proportionality test for an expansive network of facilities, WRCOG utilizes a conceptual planning level project and cost estimation approach based on typical unit costs for a variety of project types and conditions. These unit costs are intended to reflect a range of values that are typical for the types of projects that are necessary to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. These unit costs are developed for each typical project type based on actual observed values for the various materials, labor and right-of-way that would typically be required to complete a project. Although the actual materials, labor, right-of-way and associate costs to complete each specific project can be expected to vary based on the particular conditions of each site and project requirements at the time the project is actually implemented, the approach of using typical unit costs as the basis for the TUMF program represents a manageable and appropriate level of detail to establish conceptual project cost estimates that meet the requirement for rough proportionality.

The application of typical unit costs and the associated identification of a maximum TUMF share for each eligible project also provides a framework that protects the program from projects with actual costs that vary significantly from the typical cost estimates used as the program basis. The TUMF program administrative polices limit reimbursement of costs associated with eligible TUMF projects to the lesser of maximum TUMF share identified in the Nexus Study or the actual eligible project costs. In this manner, projects that are completed by participating jurisdictions or developers for less than the maximum TUMF share are reimbursed (or credited) for the actual amount expended, while projects that exceed the maximum TUMF share are only reimbursed (or credited) by the program up to the maximum TUMF share value ensuring that the program is mitigating impacts at a level that is roughly proportional to that typically expected, and is not subject to extreme project costs to address unusual or exceptional local conditions or requirements.

For the purposes of TUMF, unit cost values were developed for various eligible improvement types that all provide additional capacity needed to mitigate the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development to facilities on the TUMF Network. Eligible improvement types include:

1. Construction of additional Network roadway lanes;

2. Construction of new Network roadway segments;

3. Expansion of existing Network bridge structures;

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-2

4. Construction of new Network bridge structures;

5. Expansion of existing Network interchanges with freeways;

6. Construction of new Network interchanges with freeways;

7. Grade separation of existing Network at-grade railroad crossings;

8. Expansion of existing Network-to-Network intersections;

9. Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) of Network roadway segments.

Because roadway improvement standards vary considerably between respective jurisdictions, a typical roadway standard for the TUMF Network was recommended by the Public Works Committee (PWC) during the development of the original TUMF Nexus Study adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in October 2002 as the basis for developing the TUMF Network cost estimate. The typical roadway standard assumes the following design characteristics that are consistent with the minimum requirements of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual:

 Asphalt concrete pavement and appropriate base material to accomplish up to 12 feet per travel lane plus up to four feet for ancillary treatments (e.g. shoulders, or Class II Bike Lane);
 Concrete curb and gutter and associated drainage (e.g. paved roadway shoulders and/or open swale);
 Storm drains located within curb to curb, and associated transverse portions perpendicular to the roadway and adjoining portions longitudinal to the roadway;
 14 foot paved and painted median (or dual center left turn lane);  Traffic signals at intersections with state highways and other major arterials that are also on the TUMF Network;
 Pavement striping and roadway signing, as required;
 6 foot wide concrete sidewalks and associated curb cuts for ADA access at street crossings.

A cross-section of the Typical Roadway Standard is illustrated in Figure F-1.

Figure F-1. Typical Roadway Standard Cross-Section

It is recognized that the typical roadway standard is not appropriate in all potential TUMF Network locations. Where appropriate, typical design standards could be substituted with design elements such as open swale drainage and paved roadway shoulders with no curbing that would typically cost less than the implementation of the

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-3
Typical Roadway Standard. Roadway improvements in excess of the Typical Roadway Standard include, but are not limited to:
 Portland concrete cement pavement or other aesthetic pavement types (except at intersections);
 Major rehabilitation or overlay of existing pavement in adjacent roadway lanes;  Raised barrier medians;
 Parking lanes;
 Roadway tapers outside the extents of the approved project  Sanitary sewage infrastructure;
 Water systems
 Dry utilities
 Undergrounding infrastructure
 Relocation of non-prior rights utilities
 Storm Drain Systems in excess of draining the roadway  Landscaping;
 Streetlighting;
 Class I Bike Lanes (e.g. separate bicycle paths)
 Environmental Permitting
 Detection/Retention Basins outside of Street Right-of-Way  Agency Staff time in excess of 15% of Engineering
 Agency Staff Time in excess of 15% of Construction

These improvements in excess of Typical Roadway Standards are not eligible for TUMF funding and will be the responsibility of the local funding agency.

Unit cost estimates for the implementation of TUMF Network improvements were developed based on the unit cost to accomplish the Typical Roadway Standard. Initial unit cost estimates were developed as part of the original TUMF Nexus in 2002. These original values were adjusted as part of the 2005 Nexus Update to reflect changes in cost based on relevant indices. The unit cost estimates were fully revised as part of the 2009 Nexus Update to capture the full effects of the economic recession on the costs of labor, materials and property acquisition. For the previous 2016 Nexus Update, the unit costs were fully revised. The 2016 Nexus Update reflected the effects of the ongoing recovery from the economic recession that has saw the costs of materials, labor and land acquisition in California rebound from relative historical lows previously observed at the time of the 2009 Nexus Update.

For the 2024 Nexus Update, the unit costs were again fully revised to generate entirely new unit cost values based on the most recent available construction cost, labor cost and land acquisition cost values for comparable projects within and adjacent to Riverside County. The recalculation of the TUMF unit cost components was completed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to account for the unprecedented materials cost increases, labor shortages and high rate of inflation generally attributable to a combination of the disruption to global supply chains caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and additional tariffs on a range of products imported into the United States.

In December 2023, the unit cost values were validated utilizing Caltrans Contract Cost Data and the resultant unit costs are noted in Exhibit F-2 and summarized in Table 4.1.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-4
For simplicity, the roadway unit cost was assumed to provide for the full depth construction (including grading) of 16 feet of new pavement per lane (to accommodate a minimum 12 foot lane and ancillary treatments). The unit cost was assumed to include the following construction elements:

 Sawcut of existing pavement
 Removal of existing pavement
 Roadway excavation and embankment
 10” thick class 2 aggregate base
 4.0” thick asphaltic concrete surface
 Concrete curb, gutter and drainage improvements

Roadway unit costs were determined for each unique cost item. The source used to determine the roadway unit costs as part of the 2024 Nexus Update are listed below.

 Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021-2022
 Projects within Riverside County and Adjacent Counties  Typical experience for local cities, Western Riverside County  Michael Baker international (MBI), Structural Group
 MBI, ITS Group
 Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022-2023

All data described above was initially obtained in October 2022 and refreshed and validated in December 2023.

Right-of-way acquisition costs were determined based on the cost to acquire 18 feet of right-of-way per lane of new roadway improvement. For urban and suburban land use areas, the amount of right-of-way to be acquired as part of the TUMF program was reduced by 75% to account for property already owned by a participating jurisdiction through prior acquisition or dedication. Right-of-way unit costs were assumed to include the following elements:

 Land acquisition
 Documentation and legal fees
 Relocation and demolition costs and condemnation compensation requirements
 Utility relocation
 Direct environmental mitigation

Right-of-way unit costs were determined based on a review of actual property sales within the WRCOG region during the prior 18 month period. The task of determining the valuation per square foot of right-of-way for different land uses was completed by Epic Land Solutions, Inc.

A typical existing condition of each component type was used as a guideline for quantity assessments.
 Terrain 1: Level terrain with 0% profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile.  Terrain 2: Rolling Terrain with 1.5 % profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-5
 Terrain 3: Mountainous Terrain with 3% profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile.
 Land Use 1, 2 and 3; ROW cost factor per lane mile, for Urban, Suburban and Rural areas respectively.
 Interchange 1: Complex New Interchange/Interchange Modification. Existing complex interchange at I-15 & SR-91 was used as a guideline for quantity assessments.
 Interchange 2: New Interchange/Interchange Modification is assumed to be a New Cloverleaf Interchange consisting of 4 (3 lane) direct ramps and 4 (2 lane) loop ramps.
 Interchange 3: Major Interchange Improvement is assumed to correspond to adding 1 lane to each ramp on a cloverleaf Interchange.  Bridge: New Bridge cost. Construction cost is per linear foot per lane.  RRXing 1: New Rail Grade Crossing. Construction cost is per lane per crossing.  RRXing 2: Widening Existing Grade Crossing. Construction cost is per lane per crossing.
 ITS 1: Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on TUMF Network roadway segments per route mile

The cost estimating methodology here is intended to provide a Present Value Cost Estimate for the WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee based on year 2023 unit prices. A more detailed description of cost categories is detailed below.

I. Roadway Items
Roadway Excavation:

A unit cost of $38.55 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data) is applied to account for the excavation quantities. Assuming proposed profiles to be at 0% grade, the excavation values are estimated based on the component type as follows:
 Terrain 2 and 3: excavation for one lane (16 feet wide and 4 feet deep) is assumed.

Imported Borrow:

The unit cost used for imported borrow is $20.47 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). Locations where imported borrow is required are determined from aerial photos.
 Terrain 2 and 3: Excavation for one lane (16 feet wide and 4 feet deep) is assumed.
 Interchanges 1, 2, and 3: Vertical clearance of 24.5 feet is used to calculate the maximum amount of imported borrow at areas adjacent to an undercrossing.  RRXing 1 and 2: Vertical clearance of 31.5 feet and Bridge approach of 1,000 feet is used to determine the quantity of Imported borrow for this component type.

Clearing and Grubbing:

The unit cost for clearing and grubbing is $12,100.00 per acre (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data).

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-6
 Terrain 1, 2 and 3: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 16 feet for the addition of each new lane.
 Interchange 1 and 2: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 40 feet beyond the proposed outside edge of shoulder. The clearing and grubbing width varies depending on the number of added lanes.
 Interchange 3 and Intersection: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 16 feet for the addition of each lane.

Development of Water Supply:

A lump sum value is used to account for developing water supply. The lump sum cost is estimated as 10% of the combined cost for roadway excavation and imported borrow (Source: RCTC).

PCC Pavement:

The unit cost for PCC pavement is $354.83 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data).
 Terrain 1, 2 and 3: It is assumed that PCC is used at mainline shoulders. The PCC shoulder pavement is assumed to be 4 inch thick and 4 feet wide.

Asphalt Concrete Type A:

It is assumed that Asphalt Concrete is used at mainline and where ramp and bridge widening is required. A unit cost of $240.62 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data) is used to account for asphalt concrete quantities. The asphalt concrete overlay is assumed to be 4 inch thick.

Aggregate Base:

The unit cost for aggregate base is $73.54 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). Aggregate base quantities are estimated by means of calculating the areas of additional lanes. The aggregate base layer is considered to be 10 inch thick. It is assumed that aggregate base is used over the entire widening width below the PCC pavement and asphalt concrete layers.

Curb and Gutter:

The unit cost used for curb and gutter is $65.74 per linear foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). It is assumed that type A2-6 curb and gutter is used on the entire length of travel way where required.

Project Drainage:

A lump sum value is used to account for project drainage cost of roadway construction. The project drainage cost is estimated as 15% (Source: RCTC project 2007) of combined cost for earthwork and pavement structural section.

Traffic Signals:

The costs for traffic signals are calculated per ramp termini intersection. The unit cost used for traffic signals is $531,086 (Source: Caltrans Contract Cost Data and typical experience, Western Riverside County) per intersection. Traffic signals costs are considered only at the Intersection (Network-to-Network) upgrade.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-7
Striping:

The unit cost used for Striping is $2.58 per linear foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). It is assumed that two lines of thermo-plastic striping are required for every lane addition.

Marking:

The unit cost used for marking is $7.31 per square foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data).
 Terrains 1, 2 and 3: It is assumed that there are 8 arrow markers, 2 Stop sign markers and 4 Bike sign markers.
 Interchanges 1, 2, and 3: It is assumed that there are 2 Type I arrows on each on ramp, and 2 Type IV (L) arrows on each off ramp.
 Intersection (network to network) upgrade: It is assumed that there are 2 right turn arrows and two right lane drop arrows for each lane modification for the interchange upgrade

Pavement Marker:

Type G one-way clear retroreflective pavement markers (Spacing @ 48 feet) were assumed for Terrain 1, 2 and 3 component types only. The unit cost used for pavement marker is $5.06 each (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data).

Signage:

The signage unit cost accounts for the costs of one-post signs and two-post signs.

The unit cost used for one-post signs and two-post signs are $367.69 and $1,211.58 each, respectively (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). The post sign quantities assumed for each component type is summarized below.

Sign Type Terrain 1, 2 & 3 Interchange Intersection
1 2 3
One Post Signs 33 14 36 20 3
Two Post Signs - 4 4 4 0

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS):

The unit cost used for ITS is $686,338.50 per route mile (Source: Local Projects and MBI ITS Group). It is assumed that there is no existing ITS infrastructure (with the exception of isolated ITS devices) within the TUMF Network roadway segments and essential ITS infrastructure is furnished and installed. This essential ITS infrastructure includes ethernet switch, fiber jumper, fiber distribution unit, splice enclosure, pull box, new cabinet with foundation, 144 strand single-mode fiber optic (SMFO) cable and 3” conduits.

Minor Items, Roadway Mobilization, and Roadway Additions:

A lump sum value is used to account for minor items, roadway mobilization and roadway additions as described below. These lump sum values are recommended based on provisions in Project Development Procedure Manual (PDPM) and the

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-8
date from individual sources presented in the introduction of this report (Source:

RCTC)

Items Unit Cost
Minor Items 10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage, specialty items and traffic items.

Roadway
Mobilization
10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage,
specialty items, traffic items and minor items.

Roadway Additions 10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage, specialty items, traffic items and minor items.

II. Structure Items
New Bridge:

New interchanges account for construction of a new bridge. The unit cost for a new travel way bridge construction and RRXings1 and 2 (New and Widening of Rail Grade Crossings) is $400.00 per square foot (Source: MBI Structural group). The width of a new bridge is assumed to be 82 feet (4 lanes x 12ft + 10ft shoulder x 2 + 14ft median).

Bridge Widening:

Bridge widenings account for the widening of existing bridges. The unit cost is $500.00 per square foot (Source: MBI Structural group). The width of a bridge widening is assumed to be: 2 lanes x 12ft + 10ft shoulder. The width of an arterial crossing over rail road is assumed to be 16 feet (1 lane x 12ft + 4ft shoulder).

Structural Mobilization:

The cost for structural mobilization is estimated as 10% of total structure item cost (Source: Typical experience).

III. Right of Way Items
The right of way unit cost varies with land use designation. The unit cost for ROW was developed by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. based on a review of actual property sales within the WRCOG region during the prior 18 month period. The area of right of way acquisition for the travel way is calculated per additional lane mile, assuming the width of the right-of-way required to be 18 feet per lane (to accommodate a 12 foot roadway lane, shoulders and ancillary amenities, like storm water drainage).

The right of way acquisition for RRXings1 and 2 is calculated based on ROW acquisition for bridge approaches.

Property costs per square foot are derived by reviewing a large sample of recently sold land and improved properties within the greater Riverside area. The properties reviewed are identified specifically from completed semi large to very large infrastructure projects and upcoming projects with preferred alternatives and/or approved environmental reports. For the purposes of the 2022 Nexus Study update, an overall sample of approximately 2,700 properties was used.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-9
The properties were designated as: urban areas (generally considered downtown, or very close to downtown in the larger cities - predominantly Corona and Riverside, with a few parcels in Temecula and Moreno Valley); suburban (primarily considered the greater areas of Hemet, Perris, San Jacinto, Moreno Valley, Lake Elsinore, outer portions of Riverside / Corona, Temecula, Murrieta, Calimesa, Eastvale, Norco, and other cities of relative size and location as those previously mentioned); and rural (considered the exurban areas between Corona / Lake Elsinore and Perris along the SR-74/79, Lake Matthews, between Wildomar and Murrieta, Temecula and Perris and other similar areas) to correspond with the land use classifications used for cost estimating purposes in the TUMF program. The properties were also determined to be partial or full property takes to determine the relative percentage of each in order to appropriately weight the average cost per square foot of each type of property. Specialty cost percentages as a share of total acquisition costs (i.e. relocation and demolition) were also derived from actual costs based on a sample of the Inland Empire projects that Epic Land Solutions, Inc. was directly involved in and therefore able to obtain reliable data.

The result is an estimated average cost per square foot for ROW acquisition by land use classification which is then multiplied by the number of square feet per lane mile to obtain the required ROW to accomplish the TUMF typical cross section. The ROW requirement is then reduced by a factor of 75% for urban and suburban areas based on the collective recommendation of the PWC during the development of the initial program cost estimation methodology to reflect the assumption that a majority of the proposed TUMF facilities in these areas already exist and/or have a substantial portion of the necessary right-of-way already owned by or dedicated to the responsible jurisdiction. As a result, the TUMF program only includes the estimated cost for 25% of the right-of-way that could potentially be required to accomplish the TUMF cross sections for the conceptual improvement projects identified as part of the program in urban and suburban areas.

Maintenance of Traffic:

A lump sum value is used to account for maintenance of traffic cost of roadway construction. The project maintenance of traffic cost is estimated as 5% (Source:

RCTC) of the total project cost.

The consolidated unit cost values include typical per mile or lump sum costs for each of the eligible improvement element. These elements include new roadways, bridge improvements, interchange improvements and railroad grade separation construction costs, and right of way acquisition.

The consolidated unit costs as developed for the 2024 Nexus Update are summarized in Exhibit F-1. Exhibit F-2 provides a summary of the unit costs for the various roadway and structures construction elements defined. Exhibit F-3 provides a summary of the unit costs for the various right of way categories. Exhibit F-4 provides worksheets showing the detailed unit cost calculation for each TUMF unit cost category related to roadway and structures construction, and right of way acquisition.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-10
The unit cost assumptions were subsequently applied to the TUMF Network improvements identified to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development. The resultant cost value was tabulated for each unique segment of the network, by improvement type. A separate cost estimate was generated for regional transit improvements based on information provided by RTA and added to the TUMF Network Cost Estimate table.

Supplemental categories have been added to the cost assumptions to better delineate the costs associated with planning and engineering a project, accommodating contingencies, mitigating the cumulate multi-species habitat impacts of TUMF arterial highway improvements in accordance with the adopted Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and administering the TUMF program.

Soft Costs

The TUMF program provides for planning, engineering and contingency costs (collectively referred to as soft costs) for eligible projects to be reimbursed through the program. As indicated in Table 4.1 , planning costs are considered to include those costs associated with planning, preliminary engineering and environmental assessment of the proposed project, with the eligible amount being 10% of the estimated TUMF eligible construction cost only. Engineering costs are considered to include project study report, design, permitting and construction oversight costs based on 25% of the estimated eligible construction cost only. Contingency is provided based on 10% of the total estimated eligible facility cost.

Soft costs include all reasonable required planning, environmental clearance and mitigation, right-of-way documentation, engineering design, plan, specification and estimate preparation and construction management and oversight costs necessary to accomplish the project. The estimated soft cost factors for planning, engineering and contingency were initially established in 2002 by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, which was responsible for the development of the initial TUMF Nexus Study. The percentage multipliers were established by consensus of the PWC based on the collective experience of members in delivering similar public highway projects. A review of various data sources indicates the cost factors are generally consistent with industry guidance for conceptual cost estimation purposes. The City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering California Multi-Agency CIP Benchmarking Study (December 2016) indicates that combined design and construction management costs for roadway projects represent, on average, 50% of the total cost of construction 14. Similarly, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Practical Guide for Estimating (December 2011) also cites the following average multipliers for a range of planning and engineering activities based on national research as a basis for conceptual cost estimation:

14 City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering California Multi- Agency CIP Benchmarking Study (December 2016), Table 3-6 Average Project Delivery Costs by Project Type (% of TCC) (Full Range of TCC).

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-11

 Preliminary Engineering Costs (including survey/data collection, design, environmental, utilities and contract administration) – 10% to 25% of total construction cost15
 Construction Engineering – 10% to 26% of total construction costs16

Furthermore, the contingency rate utilized in the TUMF program is significantly less than the industry norm for conceptual cost estimation purposes. Specifically, Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021) advocates for contingency rates of 30% to 50% of total costs to be used at the project feasibility (conceptual planning) phase of project development17, with contingency rates reduced to 10% for preliminary engineers cost estimates completed during project design18.

MSHCP

Section 8.5.1 of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003, states that “each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation. Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% - 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts.” This provision is reiterated in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report (Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., October 2020) section “6. RCA Non-Fee Revenues” which states “The MSHCP forecast an array of revenue sources, in addition to fee revenue, supporting the conservation program. These sources were anticipated to total about 44 percent of the revenue for the program, including:
• Transportation funding – includes the Measure A sales tax which is authorized through 2039 and other transportation funding sources such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) charged on new development.” Table 23 Annual Non-Fee Revenue Projection in this section indicates that an average of $950,000 in MSHCP revenue was derived annually from TUMF during the three years from FY16/17- 18/19 reflecting a TUMF contribution at 5% of construction costs consistent with the MSHCP as adopted in 2003. To clearly demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the MSHCP, the TUMF program will continue to incorporate a cost element to account for the required MSHCP contribution to mitigate the multi-species habitat impacts of constructing TUMF projects.

15 AASHTO Technical Committee on Cost Estimating (TCCE) AASHTO Practical Guide for Estimating (December 2011), Table 2.4. Preliminary Engineering Costs’ Average Percentage Ranges (% of Construction).
16 AASHTO Technical Committee on Cost Estimating (TCCE) AASHTO Practical Guide for Estimating (December 2011), Section 2.2.3.2.3 Construction Engineering, “highway improvement projects in an urban environment”.
17 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Design Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021), Chapter 20 – Project Development Cost Estimates, Section 2 – Project Planning Cost Estimates, Article 2 Project Feasibility Cost Estimate, Contingencies. 18 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Design Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021), Chapter 20 – Project Development Cost Estimates, Section 3 – Project Design Cost Estimates, Article 4 Preliminary Engineer’s Cost Estimate, Contingencies.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-12

An amount equal to 5% of the construction cost for new TUMF network lanes, bridges and railroad grade separations will continue to be specifically included as part of TUMF program with revenues to be provided to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for the acquisition of land identified in the MSHCP. The relevant sections of the MSHCP document and the 2020 MSHCP Nexus Report are included in this Appendix as Exhibits F-5 and F-6, respectively.

Similarly, an amount of 4% of the total TUMF eligible network cost is included as part of the TUMF program with revenues to be utilized by WRCOG to cover the direct costs to administer the program. The costs incurred by WRCOG include direct salary, fringe benefit and overhead costs for WRCOG staff assigned to administer the program and support participating jurisdictions, and costs for consultant, legal and auditing services to support the implementation of the TUMF program.

Table 4.1 summarizes the unit cost estimate assumptions used to develop the TUMF network cost estimate, including a comparison of the original TUMF unit cost assumptions and the current revised unit cost assumptions developed as part of the 2009 Update of the TUMF Nexus Study. Cost estimates are provided in year of original values as indicated.

EXHIBIT F-1
2024 TUMF Nexus Update - Arterial Highway Cost Assumptions:

Component
Type
Cost Assumptions
as published
October 18, 2002
Cost Assumption per
2009 Nexus Update
October 5, 2009
Cost Assumptions per
2016 Update
Cost Assumptions per
2024 Update Description
Terrain 1 $550,000.00 $628,000.00 $692,000.00 $1,132,000 Construction cost per lane mile - level terrain Terrain 2 $850,000.00 $761,000.00 $878,000.00 $1,740,000 Construction cost per lane mile - rolling terrain Terrain 3 $1,150,000.00 $895,000.00 $1,064,000.00 $2,350,000 Construction cost per lane mile - mountainous terrain Landuse 1 $900,000.00 $1,682,000.00 $2,509,000.00 $7,830,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - urban areas Landuse 2 $420,000.00 $803,000.00 $2,263,000.00 $5,440,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - suburban areas Landuse 3 $240,000.00 $237,000.00 $287,000.00 $490,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - rural areas Interchange 1 n/a $43,780,000.00 $50,032,000.00 $84,190,000 Complex new interchange/interchange modification cost Interchange 2 $20,000,000.00 $22,280,000.00 $25,558,000.00 $43,490,000 New interchange/interchange modification total cost Interchange 3 $10,000,000.00 $10,890,000.00 $12,343,000.00 $22,550,000 Major interchange improvement total cost Bridge 1 $2,000.00 $2,880.00 $3,180.00 $4,800 Bridge total cost per lane per linear foot RRXing 1 $4,500,000.00 $4,550,000.00 $6,376,000.00 $18,200,000 New Rail Grade Crossing per lane mile RRXing 2 $2,250,000.00 $2,120,000.00 $2,733,000.00 $6,900,000 Existing Rail Grade Crossing per lane mile ITS n/a n/a n/a $686,400 Infrastructure for ITS of Network roadway segments per route mile Planning 10% 10% 10% 10% Planning, preliminary engineering and environmental assessment costs based on construction cost only Engineering 25% 25% 25% 25% Project study report, design, permitting  and construction oversight costs based on construction cost only Contingency 10% 10% 10% 10% Contingency costs, including TUMF program administration based on total segment cost Administration 3% 4% 4% TUMF program administration based on total TUMF eligible network cost MSHCP 5% 5% 5% TUMF component of MSHCP based on total TUMF eligible construction cost I. Roadway Items Unit Notes
Section 1: Earthwork
Roadway Excavation
Travel way cubic yard $38.55 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 190101 Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 198010 Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 170105 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost Same as RCTC Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
PCC cubic yard $354.83 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 401050 Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 390132 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 260203 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 731504 Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 Same as RCTC Section 4: Specialty Items
Retaining Walls square foot $90.00 Source: MBI structural group Ramp Realignment each
Water Quality and Erosion Control lump sum 3% of sections 1 to 3 Same as RCTC Environmental Mitigation lump sum 3% of sections 1 to 3 Same as RCTC Section 5: Traffic Items
Lighting each $7,500 Source: RCTC
Traffic Signals each $531,086 Typical for public agency projects in Western Riverside County and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 846007 Marking - Thermo plastic cross walks & pavement marking square foot $7.31 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 840516 Pavement Marker Retroreflective each $5.06 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 810230 Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021/2022 - ITEM 820840 Signage - 2 Post each $1,211.58 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 820850 Infrastructure for ITS of Network roadway segments route mile $686,383.00 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and MBI ITS Team - Assumptions: 3 Traffic Signals per route mile Section 6: Minor Items lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 5 Same as RCTC Section 7: Roadway Mobilization lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 6 Same as RCTC Section 8:Roadway Additions lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 6 Same as RCTC II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
Major New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 Interchange/Interchange, Cloverleaf Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 Interchange/Interchange, Diamond Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Major Interchange Improvement - 2 Lane Bridge Widening square foot $500.00 Interchange/Interchange, Cloverleaf Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Bridge square foot $400.00 Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Structure Mobilization lump sum 10% of structure cost Typical for public agency projects in Western Riverside County III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Urban
Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $330 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc.

Suburban
Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $229 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc.

Rural
Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $5 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc.

Utility Relocation lump sum 10% of ROW Includes mobilization for one occurrence per lane mile Total Items I + II + III Same as RCTC
Maintenance of Traffic lump sum 5% of total items Same as RCTC WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
EXHIBIT F-2
Unit Cost
2024 Nexus Update Master Unit Cost Summary
URBAN Avg. $ per SF % of Total Area Weighted Cost
Commercial
Part Take $22 1.4% $0.30
Full Take $597 7.9% $47.40

9.3%
Industrial
Part Take $29 0.5% $0.15
Full Take $267 6.0% $16.02

6.5%
Single Family Residential
Part Take $10 16.8% $1.68
Full Take $348 66.2% $230.24

83.0%
Multi Family Residential
Part Take $27 0.3% $0.07
Full Take $307 0.8% $2.52

1.1%
Average Unit Price per Square Foot: $298.38
Residential & Non-Res. Relocation (7.5%): $22.38
Demolition (3%) $8.95
Urban Unit Cost per Square Foot: $329.71
SUBURBAN Avg. $ per SF % of Total Area Weighted Share
Commercial
Part Take $17 5.1% $0.87
Full Take $425 14.6% $62.01

19.7%
Industrial
Part Take $20 0.0288 $0.58
Full Take $227 0.08645 $19.62

11.5%
Single Family Residential
Part Take $4 0.24 $0.96
Full Take $292 0.3866 $112.89

62.7%
Multi Family Residential
Part Take $14 0.0284 $0.40
Full Take $313 0.0321 $10.05

6.1%
Average Unit Price per Square Foot: $207.37
Residential & Non-Res. Relocation (7.5%): $15.55
Demolition (3%) $6.22
Suburban Unit Cost per Square Foot: $229.14
RURAL $ per SF
Range of Value of Rural Vacant land sold within last year: $0.07 - $31.48 Average price per square foot of rural land: $4.66
Miscellaneous improvements (10%): $0.46
Rural Unit Cost per Square Foot: $5.12
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
2024 Nexus Update Master Property Cost Summary
EXHIBIT F-3
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Roadway Excavation
Travel way cubic yard $38.55 0.00 $0
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 0.00 $0
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $0 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Sidewalk
PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593
Travel way
Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982
Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107
Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $135,240 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546
Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134
Total Items I $1,078,318
Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.00 $53,916
Project Cost / Lane mile $1,132,234
EXHIBIT F-4
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Terrain 1 - Level Terrain
Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Roadway Excavation
Travel way cubic yard $38.55 7,739.26 $298,348
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 7,739.26 $158,423
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $45,677 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Sidewalk
PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593
Travel way
Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982
Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107
Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $210,607 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546
Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134
Total Items I $1,656,133
Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.00 $82,807
Project Cost / Lane mile $1,738,940
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Terrain 2 - Rolling Terrain
Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Roadway Excavation
Travel way cubic yard $38.55 15,478.52 $596,697
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 15,478.52 $316,845
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $91,354 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Sidewalk
PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593
Travel way
Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982
Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107
Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $285,974 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546
Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134
Total Items I $2,233,949
Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.00 $111,697
Project Cost / Lane mile $2,345,646
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Terrain 3 - Mountainous Terrain
Unit Cost
Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile
III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Urban
Travel Way square foot $329.71 95,040.00 $31,335,419
Project Cost / Lane mile 25% $7,833,855
Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile
III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Suburban
Travel Way square foot $229.14 95,040.00 $21,777,847
Project Cost / Lane mile 25% $5,444,462
I. Roadway Items Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Rural
Travel Way square foot $5.12 95,040.00 $486,605
Project Cost / Lane mile $486,605
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
Landuse 3 - ROW Rural areas
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Landuse 1 - ROW Urban areas
Landuse 2 - ROW Suburban Areas
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 700,000.00 $14,329,000
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 51.93 $628,349
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $1,432,900 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 13,500.00 $3,248,370 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 34,000.00 $2,500,360 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 31,000.00 $2,037,940 Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $3,626,538 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 84,250.00 $217,365 Marking square foot $7.31 368.00 $2,690
Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 14.00 $5,148
Signage - 2 Post each $1,211.58 4.00 $4,846
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
Complex New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 140,400.00 $56,160,000 Total Items I + II + III $84,193,506
Total Project Cost / lane mile $84,193,506
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Interchange 1 - Complex New Interchange/Interchange Modification Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 400,000.00 $8,188,000
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 25.12 $304,000
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $818,800 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 7,040.00 $1,693,965 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 17,706.67 $1,302,148 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 16,000.00 $1,051,840 Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $2,003,813 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 43,200.00 $111,456 Marking square foot $7.31 368.00 $2,690
Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 36.00 $13,237
Signage - 2 Post each $1,211.58 4.00 $4,846
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 70,000.00 $28,000,000 Total Items I + II + III $43,494,795
Total Project Cost / lane mile $43,494,795
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Interchange 2 - New Interchange/Interchange Modification Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 180,000.00 $3,684,600
Clearing & Grubbing
Travel way acre $12,100.00 3.97 $48,000
Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $368,460 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 3,128.89 $752,873 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 7,869.63 $578,733 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 16,000.00 $1,051,840 Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $972,676 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 32,000.00 $82,560 Marking square foot $7.31 184.00 $1,345
Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 20.00 $7,354
Signage - 2 Post each $1,211.58 4.00 $4,846
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
Major Interchange Improvement - 2 Lane Bridge Widening square foot $500.00 30,000.00 $15,000,000 Total Items I + II + III $22,553,287
Total Project Cost / lane mile $22,553,287
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Interchange 3 - Major Interchange Improvement
Unit Cost
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Bridge square foot $400.00 12.00 $4,800
Total Items I + II + III $4,800
Total Project Cost / lane mile $4,800
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Bridge 1 - New Bridge Cost
Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 17,931.03 $367,048
Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 782.22 $188,218 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 1,967.41 $144,683 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 1,180.00 $77,573
Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $116,628 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 1,180.00 $3,044 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
Bridge square foot $400.00 2,880.00 $1,152,000
III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Urban
Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $329.71 49,000.00 $16,155,790 Total Items I + II + III $18,204,986
Total Project Cost / lane mile $18,204,986
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
RRXing 1 - New Rail Grade Crossing
Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork
Imported Borrow
Travel way cubic yard $20.47 17.78 $364
Section 2: Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 782.22 $188,218 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 1,967.41 $144,683 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 1,180.00 $77,573
Section 3: Drainage
Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $61,626 Section 5: Traffic Items
Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 1,180.00 $3,044 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
Bridge square foot $400.00 2,880.00 $1,152,000
III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Urban
Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $329.71 16,000.00 $5,275,360 Total Items I + II + III $6,902,869
Total Project Cost / lane mile $6,902,869
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
RRXing 2 - Widen Existing Rail Grade Crossing
Unit Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Quantity / route mile Cost / route mile Infrastructure for ITS of Network roadway segments route mile $686,383.00 1.00 $686,383 Total Items I + II + III $686,383
Total Project Cost / route mile $686,383
EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued)
WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update
Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on TUMF Network Roadway Segments Unit Cost

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-13
EXHIBIT F-5

Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)
adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003

Section 8.0 MSHCP Funding/Financing of Reserve Assembly and Management

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-14

8.5 LOCAL FUNDING PROGRAM
The following local funding plan describes the local commitment for funding Reserve Assembly, Management, and Monitoring.

The local funding program includes funding from a variety of sources, including but not limited to, regional funding resulting from the importation of waste into landfills in Riverside County, mitigation for regional public infrastructure projects, mitigation for private infrastructure projects, mitigation for private Development, funds generated by local or regional incentive programs that encourage compact growth and the creation of transit-oriented communities, and dedications of lands in conjunction with local approval of private development projects.

The local funding program will fund the local portion of:
! Land acquisition
! Management
! Monitoring
! Adaptive Management
! Plan administration

8.5.1 Funding Sources
Local funding sources include funding from both public and private developers and regional entities in an effort to spread the financial burden of the MSHCP over a broad base. The mix of funding sources provides an e quitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP. In addition to equitably distributing mitigation for local projects, utilizing a mixture of funding sources will help ensure the long-term viability of the local funding program because a temporary decline in funding from one source may be offset by increases from another. The proposed local funding sources are described below and include:
! Local Development Mitigation Fees
! Density Bonus Fees
! Regional Infrastructure Project Contribution
! Landfill Tipping Fees

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-15
! Other Potential New Revenue Sources
' Local Development Mitigation Fees
New Development affects the environment directly through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from Development. Government Code Section 66000 et seq. allows cities and counties to charge new Development for the costs of mitigating the impacts of new Development. The Cities and County will implement a Development Mitigation Fee pursuant to the MSHCP; this fee will be one of the primary sources of funding the implementation of the MSHCP.

The fee ordinance adopted by the Cities and the County will provide for an annual CPI adjustment based upon the Consumer Price Index for “All Urban Consumers” in the Los Ange les-Anaheim- Riverside Area, measured as of the month of Dece mber in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. There will also be a provision for the fee to be reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new Development. A fee of approximately $1,500 per residential unit (or an equivalent fee per acre) and $4,800 per acre of commercial or industrial Development was used in the revenue projection shown in Appendix B-05 of this document. The projected revenues from the Development Mitigation Fee are anticipated to be approximately $540 million over the next 25 years. A nexus study is required to demonstrate that the proposed f ee is proportionate to the impacts of the new Development.
' Density Bonus Fees
The New Riverside County General Plan creates a number of incentive plans that have the potential both to further the goals of the Coun ty’s General Plan and to facilitate the implementation of the MSHCP. Section 8.4 .2 above disc usses the use of the Rural Incentive Program to aid in the Conservation of lands through non-acquisition means. An additional component of the Incentive Program enables developers to acquire the right to develop at an additional 25% increase in density by providing enhancemen ts to their pr ojects and by paying a “Density Bonus Fee.” The fee is anticipated to be $3,000 – $5,000 per additional unit. This program offers a significant incentive to developers when compared with the typical cost of creating a new buildable lot.

The Density Bonus progr am is new to Riverside County, and it is, therefore, difficult to project annual revenues. The Local Funding Program assumes that between 10% and 20% of the residential units built in the unincorporated County area will participate in the incentive program and that only 50% of the revenues of the program will be committed to the MSHCP, with the remaining portion staying in t he local community in which the additional units are located to provide additional

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-16
amenities that will help offset the greater density. Of the 330,000 units projected to be built over the next 25 years, 1 0% (or 33,000 units) are assumed to be built utilizing the Density Bonus Fee resulting in $132,000,000 in revenues of which 50% (or $66,000,000) will be allocated to the MSHCP.
' Regional Infrastructure Project Contribution
Regional infrastructure projects directly affect the environment not only through the effect they have on species and their Habitats, but also by facilitating continued new Development. It is appropriate, therefore, for regional infrastructure projects to contribute to Plan implementation . Four general categories of infrastructure projects have been identified:
! Transportation Infrastructure
! Regional Utility Projects
! Local Public Capital Construction Projects
! Regional Flood Control Projects
Transportation Infrastructure
The RCIP has identified the need for approximately $12 billion in new transportation infrastructure to support the Development proposed for the next 25 years. Each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation . Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% – 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts. The local funding program anticipates that more than one-half of the $12 billion cost of contribution to acquisition of Additional Reserve Lands will be funded locally and will result in approximately $371 million in contribution over the next 25 years as discussed below.
< Riverside County’s ½ cent sales tax for Transportation In 1988, Riverside County voters approved a measure to increase local sales tax by ½ cent to fund new transportation projects (Measure A). The sales tax measure is due to be reauthorized in 2002.

Under the reauthorization, $121 million will be allocated as local contribution under the MSHCP. (For further information on the sales tax measure, see Section 13.5 of the MSHCP Im plementing Agreement and Appendix B-07 of this document).

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-17
Regional Utility Projects
As Riverside County’s population doubles over the next 25 years, new regional utility infrastructure will be require d. Since the utilities are not Permittees under the MSHCP, they may choose to mitigate under the Plan or seek their own regulatory permits. In either case, their mitigation will be focused on the objectives of the MSHCP and will contribute to the local implementation funding.

No estimate of the number of projects or the scope or costs is available at this time; consequently, no estimate of mitigation funding has been made. The Permittees expect that regional utility projects will contribute to the implementation of the MSHCP and provide an additional contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected.

Local Public Capital Construction Projects
Local public capital construction projects may include construction of new schools, universities, City or County administrative facilities, jails, courts, juvenile facilities, parks, libraries, or other facilities that serve the public. These projects will be mitigated under the MSHCP and will utilize a per acre mitigation fee based on the fee then in place for private, commercial and industrial Development.

No attempt has been made to estimate the number or magnitude of these projects. The Permittees expect that local pubic construction projects will contribute to the implementation of the MSHCP and provide an additional contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected.

Regional Flood Control Projects
Flood control projects will receive coverage under the MSHCP for both new capital construction and for the maintenance of existing and new facilities. Preliminary estimates from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District indicate that they will likely budget approximately $15 M in projects annually. Based on using 3% of capital costs, the District would be expected to contribute approximately $450,000 to $750,000 annually to MSHCP implementation. Since many flood control projects serve existing developed communities and therefore have less impacts than projects adding capacity to serve new Development and may provide some conservation valu e especially in terms of Constrained Linkages, the District’s contributions may average something below the 5% level on average.

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-18
' Landfill Tipping Fees
Riverside County has utilized revenues from public and private landfills in Riverside County to generate funding for conservation and open space projects for over a decade. In 1990, the County utilized $1 per ton tipping fee assessed all waste deposited in County landfills to fund the acquisition of the Santa Rosa Plateau and approximately $260,000 annually to fund the operation of the County Park and Open Space Distr icts. More recently, the County has negotiated agreements with two private landfills in the County to commit $1 per ton on all waste imported from outside Riverside County to Conservation within Riverside County.

El Sobrante Landfill
This privately owned landfill was permitted to expand its capacity to 10,000 tons per day in 2001.

In approving t he landfill expansion, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors authorized fifty cents per ton of the County’s portion of the revenue from the landfill expansion to be applied to Conservation in addition to the $1 per ton that was committed under the landfill agreement. The projection of the annual tonnage and revenue for Conservation included in Appendix B-09 of this document reflects the $1.5 per ton commitment to Conservation. Over the life of the landfill, 60 million tons of imported waste are allowed. Sixty million tons at $1.5 per ton will generate $90 million for Conservation. The Cash Flow Analysis in Appendix B-10 of this document reflects the annual revenues from the El Sobrante Landfill.

County Landfills
The County Board of Supervisors, beginning in 1990, authorized $1 per ton for all in-county waste deposited in County landfills to go toward habitat and open space Conservation. After adjusting for the debt service on the Santa Rosa Plateau acquisition and an annual commitment to the Park and Open Space District, there is a projected annual balance of $400,000 that can be applied to additional Conservation under the MSHCP. Appendix B-09 of this document includes a projection of tonnage from in-Co unty waste at County landfills. The Cash Flow Analysis in Appendix B-10 of this document reflects the annual revenues from the County landfills. Over the next 25 years, County landfills will contribute approximately $10 million to the implementation of the MSHCP.

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-19
Eagle Mountain
In 1997, the County approved the use of the old Kaiser mine at Eagle Mountain in eastern Riverside County as a regional landfill to serve primarily Los Angeles County. Subsequently, the Los Angeles County Sanitation District has acqui red the rig hts to the Eagle Mountain Landfill and intends to begin operation of the landfill within the next decade. At this time, litigation is still pending th at could prohibit the development of the landfill. The Development Agreement with the County would require the payment of $1 per ton for Conservation if the landfill is developed. Conservation needs in the Coachella Valley would have firs t priority o ver the revenues from the Eagle Mountain Landfill; however, some portion of the revenues would be available to support Conservation needs in Western Riverside County. The Permittees expect that the Eagle Mountain Landfill will provide funding to support implementati on of t he MSHCP over the life of the MSHCP. However, no revenue from the Eagle Mountain Landfill has been projected in the funding program at this time.

These potential revenue s provide a contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected. ' Potential New Revenue Sources
The County and Cities may levy assessments to pay for services that directly benefit the property on which the fee is levied. Under current law, a local election may be required t o initiall y levy the assessment or to co nfirm the assessment if a protest is filed. No such assessments are currently projected for the MSHCP. As the MSHCP Conservation Area is developed, however, its value as open space and for recreation opportunities may lend itself to a local funding program for ongoing management and enhancement. In more urban areas, which Western Riverside County will be in 25 years, local voters routinely approve such funding programs.

Other revenue opportunities may be realized over the next 25 years. The County, Cities, and RCA will explore new revenue sources to support the acquisition of the MSHCP Conservation Area and its long-term management and enhancement. A goal of any new fee would be to spread a portion of the costs for the MSHCP across as broad a regional base as possible.

8.0 MSHCP Funding/ Financing of
Reserve Assembly and Management
VOLUME I — SECTION 8 June 17, 2003
FINAL MSHCP 8-20
TABLE 8-5

LOCAL PUBLIC/REGIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
Source Anticipated $ Range Requirements to Implement Responsible Party Private Funding Sources:

Cities and County
Development Mitigation Fees
$539.6M Approval of County Ordinance
Approval of City(ies) Ordinance
County
Cities
Density Bonus Fees $66M Approval of General Plan County Public Funding Sources
Local Roads $121M Approval of Measure A, local agreement on allocation
RCTC/County
Other Transportation $250M % of new road construction RCTC/County Other infrastructure Projects $unknown Project-by-project negotiation County and Cities El Sobrante Landfill $90M In place County
County Landfills $10M In place County
Eagle Mountain Landfill $unknown In place pending start-up County New Regional funding $unknown Voter approval County and Cities TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS $1,076.6M

8.6 ADEQUACY OF FUNDING
The Permittees and the Wildlife Agencies will annually eva luate the performance of the funding mechanisms and, notwithstand ing othe r provisions of the MSHCP, will develop any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms to address additional funding n eeds. Additionally, this annual evaluation will include an assessment of the funding plan and anticipate funding needs over the ensuing 18 mont hs for the purpose of identifying any potential deficiencies in cash flow. If deficiencies are identified through this evaluation, then the Permittees and the Wildlife Agencies will develop strategies to address any additional funding needs consistent with the terms and conditions of the MSHCP.

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 F-14
EXHIBIT F-6

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., October 2020

Final Report
Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Nexus Fee Study Update

Prepared for:

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority

Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

October 2020

EPS #171034

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION AND KEY FINDINGS .............................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................ 1 Original and Existing Fee Schedule ............................................................................ 2 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedules ............................................................................. 3 Key Drivers of Fee Change ....................................................................................... 6 Organization of Report ............................................................................................. 8

2. MSHCP POLICIES, GOALS, AND FINANCING STRATEGY ....................................................... 9 MSHCP Purpose, Basis, and Goals.............................................................................. 9 MSHCP Financing Strategy ..................................................................................... 11 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources ................................................... 13 Development Mitigation Fees and Calculation ............................................................ 16

3. HABITAT PROTECTION TO DATE AND FUTURE CONSERVATION SCENARIO ................................. 18 Habitat Protection Accomplishments Through 2019 .................................................... 18 Conservation Goals and Progress ............................................................................ 18 Land Dedications .................................................................................................. 20 Future Conservation Scenario ................................................................................. 21

4. FORECASTS OF DEVELOPMENT, DEDICATION, FEE PAYMENT ................................................ 25 Historic Development and HCP Fees ......................................................................... 25 Growth Projections ................................................................................................ 26

5. MSHCP IMPLEMENTATION COSTS .............................................................................. 31 Land Costs ........................................................................................................... 31 Other Costs—Administration, Management, and Monitoring ......................................... 35 Endowment Funding .............................................................................................. 38 Total Implementation Costs .................................................................................... 40

6. RCA NON-FEE REVENUES ....................................................................................... 43 MSHCP Forecast of Non-Fee Revenues ..................................................................... 43 New Forecast of Non-Fee Revenues ......................................................................... 44

7. MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION ................................................................................. 46

8. MITIGATION FEE ACT (NEXUS) FINDINGS ..................................................................... 52 Purpose of Fee ..................................................................................................... 52 Use of Fee Revenues ............................................................................................. 53 Relationship ......................................................................................................... 53 Need ................................................................................................................... 54 Proportionality ...................................................................................................... 54

9. FEE IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................ 56 Adoption of Revised LDMF ...................................................................................... 56 Securing Supplemental Funding .............................................................................. 56 Annual Review ...................................................................................................... 56 Surplus Funds ...................................................................................................... 57 Annual and Periodic Updates................................................................................... 57

Appendix I: Detailed Time Series of Implementation Costs, Excluding Endowment Funding Appendix II: Detailed Time Series of Endowment Funding

List of Tables
Table 1 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule ............................................................ 3 Table 2 Updated MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees .................. 4 Table 3 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedule by Extension Scenario ................................... 6 Table 4 MSHCP Goals by Area Plan ........................................................................ 11 Table 5 2004 Estimates: MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources ............... 14 Table 6 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule .......................................................... 17 Table 7 Conservation Through End of 2019 ............................................................. 18 Table 8 Required Acquisition Acres to Achieve ARL Goals .......................................... 24 Table 9 Projected Growth in Western Riverside County, through 2050 ......................... 29 Table 10 Projected Developed Acres in Western Riverside County, by Extension Scenario ................................................................................... 30 Table 11 Per-Acre Land Value Estimates— 2003 Dollars (2003 Nexus Study) .................. 32 Table 12 Local Conservation Costs Through 2018 ...................................................... 32 Table 13 Planning Level Per Acre Land Value Estimates by Category ............................. 33

Table 14 Illustrative Distribution of Land Acquisitions by Land Use and Size................... 34 Table 15 Aggregate Land Value of Remaining Areas (2017 dollars) ............................... 34 Table 16 Administrative and Professional Services Costs ............................................. 36 Table 17 Management and Monitoring Anticipated Costs in 2004 and 2019 Dollars ........ 38 Table 18 Annual Implementation Cost Estimate (2019$) ............................................. 39 Table 19 Endowment Funding (2019$), by Extension Scenario .................................... 40 Table 20 Total Implementation Costs (2019$*), by Extension Scenario ......................... 41 Table 21 Average Annual Implementation Costs (2019$), by Extension Scenario ............ 42 Table 22 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources ................................................... 44 Table 23 Annual Non-Fee Revenue Projection (2019$s) .............................................. 45 Table 24 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees ............................ 47 Table 25 Recommended Fee Level—No Extension ...................................................... 48 Table 26 Recommended Fee Level—5- Year Extension ................................................. 49 Table 27 Recommended Fee Level—10- Year Extension ............................................... 50 Table 28 Recommended Fee Level—15- Year Extension ............................................... 51

List of Figures
Figure 1 State of Conservation in 2003: Conserved Land, Additional Reserve Land to be Acquired, and Total MSHCP Conservation Area Needed .................. 10 Figure 2 MSHCP Estimated Annual Costs in Millions, 2004 Dollars ................................ 15 Figure 3 MSHCP Estimated Annual Revenues in Millions, 2004 Dollars .......................... 16 Figure 4 MSHCP Conservation Goals, 2019 and 2029 Goals Highlighted ........................ 19 Figure 5 Progress Towards ARL Through End of 2019 ................................................ 20 Figure 6 Residential Unit Development, Western Riverside County, 2005-2019 .............. 25 Figure 7 New Housing Units per Year, SCAG and MSHCP Projections and Historic Production (2005-2019) ................................................................. 27 Figure 8 Newly Developed Commercial Acres per Year ............................................... 27 Figure 9 Comparison of Costs by Category ............................................................... 40 Figure 10 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources ................................................... 44

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

1. INTRODUCTION AND KEY FINDINGS
This Updated Nexus Study (2020 Nexus Study) provides the technical justification for changes to the Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule that applies to Local Permittee participants in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan). These changes are necessary to ensure adequate funding of the obligations of the Local Permittees under the MSHCP and the associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement. The resulting increased fee revenues will support the continued implementation of the MSHCP and the streamlining of endangered species incidental take permitting for new Western Riverside County development provided under the MSHCP. This Nexus Study is consistent with the requirements of California Government Code 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act) that requires specific findings (as well as administration and implementation procedures) for “any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency.”
Background
The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan), originally adopted in 2004, is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) focusing on the conservation of species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP was developed in response to the need for future growth opportunities in Western Riverside County while addressing the requirements of the State and federal Endangered Species Acts. The MSHCP serves as an HCP pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan under the NCCP Act of 2001. The MSHCP streamlines these environmental permitting processes by allowing the participating jurisdictions to authorize “take” of plant and wildlife species identified within the Plan Area. At the same time, Plan implementation provides a coordinated MSHCP Conservation Area and implementation program to preserve biological diversity and maintain the region’s quality of life.

The MSHCP and the associated Implementing Agreement and Incidental Take Permit collectively determine a set of conservation actions that must be taken to meet the terms of the Incidental Take Permit and benefit from the regulatory streamlining and other benefits of the MSHCP. This includes the identification of the responsible parties, including the responsibilities of the Local Permittees.
1 One of the key requirements of the MSHCP, Implementing Agreement, and Incidental Take Permit (consistent with the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act) is the provision of adequate funding by Local Permittees to the Implementing Entity (the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority2) to conduct their portion of the conservation actions identified in the MSHCP.

1 Local Permittees include the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Park and Open-Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, and Riverside County Transportation Commission. 2 The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Agency is a Joint Powers Authority established in 2004 to implement the MSHCP.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Section 8.0 of the MSHCP outlines the MSHCP funding/financing approach. It also identified best estimates of Plan implementation costs at the time of Plan adoption, including the local funding commitment that represents a portion of the overall land acquisition, management and monitoring, and Plan administration costs. The Local Funding Program included a mix of funding sources to provide “an equitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP.” The proposed funding sources included Local Development Mitigation Fees (and land dedications), regional infrastructure project public contributions (including contributions to mitigate for transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects), and landfill tipping fees.

Participating cities and the County were each required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee under California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the “Mitigation Fee Act”) and supported by the separate “Final Mitigation Fee Nexus Study Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan,” July 1, 2003 (Original or 2003 Nexus Study). The MSHCP funding chapter notes the need for frequent evaluations of the performance of the funding mechanisms and assessments of the funding plan and the need to make any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms. The MSHCP also notes that the mitigation fee will need to be “reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new development.”
In addition to the common practice of updating mitigation fees periodically to account for changing circumstances, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) has determined that significant changes have occurred and/or circumstances have arisen that justify an update to the mitigation fees. These changes include, but are not limited to, the following:
• The need to acquire more land than originally forecast due to the lower than expected land dedication.
• The lower-than-expected levels of non-fee funding from local and regional funding sources. • The lower than expected levels of residential development. • The need to diversify land acquisitions away from a focus on the larger, more remote parcels to also acquiring parcels closer to urbanized areas, consistent with the reserve assembly requirements of the MSHCP.

Original and Existing Fee Schedule
All local jurisdictions participating in the MSHCP and obtaining coverage for public and private take in their jurisdictions were required to adopt and implement the 2004 Mitigation Fee Schedule through ordinance and resolution and then to pass through the fee funding (except for any additional administrative charges added by the jurisdictions) to the RCA to fund MSHCP implementation. The ordinances allowed for periodic inflationary increases based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area. In 2018 the Bureau of Labor Statistics implemented a geographic revision, establishing Riverside as its own Core Based Statistical Area. As a result, Riverside was removed from the Consumer Price Index encompassing Los Angeles and Anaheim. Going forward, inflationary increases will be based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the newly established Riverside-San Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Bernardino-Ontario area. As outlined in the 2003 Nexus Study (Original Nexus Study), all new development in Western Riverside County is required to pay the mitigation fee.

Table 1 shows the original 2004 Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule and the current 2021 Fee Schedule that reflects periodic inflationary fee adjustments using the indexing process that collectively increased the fees by 35 percent between 2004 and 2020 (this was below the overall inflation index increase over this period).

Table 1 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule
Fee Category
2004 Fee per unit or
per acre
2021 Fee per
unit or per acre3
Residential: Up to 8.0 dwelling units per acre
(DUAC) $1,651 $2,234
Residential: 8.0-14.0 DUAC $1,057 $1,430
Residential: 14.0+ DUAC $859 $1,161
Commercial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606
Industrial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606

Updated Mitigation Fee Schedules
This 2020 Nexus Study has estimated the increased fee level that would be required to provide sufficient revenues, based on the best available forecasts of future growth, to support the full implementation of the MSHCP, including the completion of all land acquisition and the establishment of the necessary endowment, by 2029 (Year 25 of Plan implementation).4 Because, as shown below, this would require a major increase in the fee levels, three other scenarios are also considered where different time extensions provide more time for land acquisition.5 These extensions allow for the costs of Plan implementation (including land acquisitions) to be spread across more development and, as a result, moderate the level of mitigation fee increase required. In addition, the longer extension scenarios require a pace of land acquisition that is more consistent with what has proven to be achievable. All of these fee

3 Note it is RCA procedure to refer to fees during, for example, Fiscal Year 2020/2021, as the 2021 fee. The 2021 fee became effective July 1, 2020, and applies for the fiscal year of 2020-21 (i.e., until June 30, 2021 when the 2022 Fee begins).
4 The MSHCP provided a 25-year period of the required land acquisition with the larger 75-year permit term. This is labelled the “No Extension” or “Baseline Scenario” in this Update Study. 5 The baseline scenario as well as the extension scenarios assume that all land acquisition as well as the full endowment will be completed/ established by the end of the specified implementation/ land acquisition period. Interest from the non-depleting endowment will fund all ongoing costs thereafter.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx increases would be consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act and the MSHCP and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement.

The mitigation fee levels shown for each extension scenario are the fee levels required to cover the appropriate portion of the Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs based on the best information available at this time. The revised mitigation fee levels reflect changes in estimated costs, expected levels of land dedication, and non-fee funding. Consistent with the MSHCP and Original Nexus Study, it is assumed that all new development in Western Riverside County will pay the mitigation fee because, as noted in the MSHCP, “new development affects the environment through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from such development.”6 Importantly, the revised mitigation fee levels also reflect the decision to determine the mitigation fee that applies to different land uses on a consistent per gross acre basis. This approach is considered to provide a clear, consistent, and proportionate method for determining mitigation fees on new development.7 The 2020 Nexus Study does convert the overarching per gross acre fee into per unit residential fees for different density ranges; this conversion was conducted to provide implementation/administrative consistency for member jurisdictions.

Table 2 Updated MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees

6 Consistent with the Original Nexus Study and the technical analysis in this study update (and as described in more detail in the Fee Implementation Handbook), certain types of public improvements/ infrastructure projects will make mitigation payments calculated as a percent of total improvement cost. All projects are required to make a mitigation payment/contribution (except where exempted as specified in the Ordinance); where no mitigation payment process is specified, the project will pay the updated per acre mitigation fee.
7 This is the approach taken by the majority of regional Habitat Conservation Plans in California, including the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan mitigation fee.

Fee Per Acre No Extension
5-Year
Extension
10-Year
Extension
15-Year
Extension
Net Cost $912,756,583 $902,353,150 $892,767,438 $883,987,805 Acres of Development
Residential 14,026 21,818 29,611 37,403
Nonresidential 6, 239 9,705 13,171 16,637
Total 20,265 31,523 42,782 54,040
Mitigation Fee per Acre $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx As shown in Table 2, the required mitigation fee per gross acre of development varies substantially based on level of extension as follows:
• No Extension. Under the current structure, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 25 of MSHCP implementation (2029), a mitigation fee of $45,041 per acre of development would be required.
• 5-Year Extension. With a 5-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 30 of MSHCP implementation (2034), a mitigation fee of $28,625 per acre of development would be required.
• 10-Year Extension. With a 10-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 35 of MSHCP implementation (2039), a mitigation fee of $20,868 per acre of development would be required.
• 15-Year Extension. With a 15-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 40 of MSHCP implementation (2044), a mitigation fee of $16,358 per acre of development would be required.

For residential development, the per gross acre fee is translated into per residential unit fees by density category to provide for a fee framework that is consistent with the current fee structure.

The per residential unit fees are calculated by dividing the per gross acre fee by an assumed typical/ average density for each of the three density ranges (low, medium, and high).8 The full mitigation fee schedule (for each extension scenario) is shown in Table 3, including the per unit residential fees by density category and per gross acre fees for non-residential development.

The typical/ average residential densities used to calculate the per-unit residential fees are the same as the density assumptions in the Original Nexus Study.9

8 For example, the $3,635 per unit Residential – Low fee under the 15-year extension is derived by dividing the overall per gross acre mitigation fee of $16,358 (shown in Figure 2) by the assumed typical/average density of Residential Low of 4.5 units/acre. 9 The Fee Implementation Handbook provides more specifics on how to determine a project’s residential density and therefore the appropriate per unit residential fee that applies.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 6 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 3 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedule by Extension Scenario

Key Drivers of Fee Change
The change in Local Development Mitigation Fee is the result of a number of different contributing factors (“moving parts”), fully documented and detailed in Chapters 2 through 7.

This Nexus Study is based on the most current information available including, for some inputs, recent years of experience from MSHCP implementation. The factors that have had the most significant effect on the Local Development Mitigation Fee calculations are summarized below.

1. Lower-than-expected land dedications substantially increase the Local Permittee habitat acquisition cost component of MSHCP implementation. The MSHCP assumed that 41,000 of the 97,000 acres (42 percent) to be conserved by Local Permittee action/funding would be provided at no cost through land dedication associated with development inside the Criteria Cells. Through the first sixteen years of Plan implementation, less than 1,000 acres of the Local Permittee habitat conservation obligations have been generated through these dedications. An additional 10,000 acres of land dedication requirements have been required as part of proposed developments that have yet to occur. Beyond the dedication associated with previously proposed projects, additional land dedication is not expected.10 As a result, the 2020 Nexus Study assumes the noted 10,000 acres of land dedication is formalized over the next eight years (an average annual land dedication of 1,250 acres per year) prior to the end of the current land acquisition period. No additional land dedication is assumed, even if the acquisition period is extended.

As a result, at the end of the current habitat acquisition period (Year 25 of Plan

10 In September 2016, the RCA revised its fee credit and waiver policy, limiting the likelihood of projects paying fees and dedicating land.

Fee Per Unit No
Extension
5-Year
Extension
10-Year
Extension
15-Year
Extension
Residential - Low (Up to 8.0 DUAC)2 3
$2,234 $10,009 $6,361 $4,637 $3,635
Residential - Medium (8.0-14.0 DUAC)2 3
$1,430 $4,170 $2,650 $1,932 $1,515
Residential - High (14.0+ DUAC) 2 3
$1,161 $1,846 $1,173 $855 $670
Commercial / Industrial (per acre) $7,606 $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

3. DUAC stands for Dwelling Units per Acre.

Current Fee
20211

1. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Conservation. Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule for FY 2020-21 (Effective July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021), annually adjusted using the Consumer Price Index .

2. Per acre mitigation fees translated into per unit fees based on the following residential densities: for low density, 4.5 units per acre; for medium density, 10.8 units per acre; for high density, 24.4 units per acre, consistent with the assumptions used in Appendix E of the original Nexus Study.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 7 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx implementation), total land dedication is expected to represent about 11,000 acres and about 11 percent of the Local Permittee land conservation requirement. The RCA therefore needs to directly acquire an additional 30,000 acres of land relative to the expectations of the Original Nexus Study.

2. Lower than expected regional infrastructure public contributions have reduced the non-fee funding available, increasing the costs to be funded through the mitigation fee. The MSHCP assumed a substantial level of funding from regional infrastructure project public contributions, including transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects, as well as from landfill tipping fees. While the Measure A sales tax has provided substantial funding as expected, other revenue sources, on aggregate, have provided (and are expected to continue to provide) substantially less funding than forecast in the 2003 Nexus Study. As a result, mitigation fees will need to cover about 91 percent of Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs relative to the original assumption of about 56 percent.

3. The change towards a consistent “per gross developed acre” fee basis provides a more consistent approach for all land use development types. The 2003 Nexus Study used an “Equivalent Benefit Unit” approach to distributing mitigation costs between different land use categories. This Nexus Study adjusts the fee calculation to the more commonly used per gross acre basis. Under this approach, the new Local Development Mitigation Fees are all based on one “across the board” per gross acre fee determination. Non-residential development then pays this per acre fee, while per unit residential fees by density category are derived from this common per gross acre fee.11 This change evens out some of the prior differences in mitigation fee levels.

4. The estimates of average per acre land values have not changed substantially, so they have had a limited effect on the change in mitigation fees. The original MSHCP implementation cost estimate was based on an average land value of about $13,100 per acre. This was based on research on land transactions of parcels with different land use designations and sizes in 2001/2002. The land valuation analysis conducted for this Nexus Study estimated a planning-level land value of about $14,300 per acre based on land transactions primarily in the 2014 to 2017 period (inflated to 2019-dollar terms). As a result, land value estimates have not changed substantially in nominal dollar terms since the Original Nexus Study. This estimated per acre land value is above the cost of most RCA transactions to date, though the average land values of future RCA land acquisition are expected to increase due to the increasing need to purchase more expensive land in “linkage” areas.

11 Similar to the Original Nexus Study, all new development in Western Riverside County is required to pay the mitigation fee (or otherwise provide the necessary mitigation). The conversion from per gross acre to per unit fees for residential development is conducted to provide administrative continuity for member agencies.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 8 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Organization of Report
This Nexus Study includes several chapters. Chapter 1, this chapter, describes the purpose and need for this Nexus Study, the recommended changes in the Local Development Mitigation Fee, and the key drivers of these changes. Chapters 2 through 7 provide the technical analysis that supports the updated fees and nexus findings. Chapter 2 summarizes the purpose of and basis for the MSHCP, the conservation requirements of the MSHCP, and the financing strategy and approach developed to implement the MSHCP in 2004. Chapter 3 describes the conservation achievements to date, identifies the remaining conservation requirements, and identifies expected land dedication. Chapter 4 provides the development forecast used in the calculation of the updated mitigation fees. Chapter 5 provides the estimates of MSHCP implementation costs, including land acquisition, management and monitoring, program administration, and endowment. Chapter 6 describes the historical levels of non-fee revenues available to help fund Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs. Chapter 7 brings together the technical analysis in Chapters 2 through 6 to estimate the updated 2020 Local Development Mitigation Fees.

Chapter 8 provides the nexus findings required under the Mitigation Fee Act as require to establish the updated fees. Finally, Chapter 9 highlights some of the administration and implementation requirements under the Mitigation Fee Act, recognizing that the Fee Implementation Handbook provides more specific guidance to the RCA and its partner agencies on the implementation of the mitigation fee program.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

2. MSHCP POLICIES, GOALS, AND FINANCING STRATEGY
MSHCP Purpose, Basis, and Goals
In response to the need to maintain future growth opportunities in Western Riverside County while addressing the requirements of the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, the County and the Riverside County Transportation Commission initiated the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) in 1999. The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is one part of the RCIP that includes:
• Updated County General Plan. Addresses the required general plan elements such as land use, circulation, housing and open space, and conservation and includes programs to implement the MSHCP, enhance transit alternatives, and encourage development of mixed- use centers.
• Community and Environment Transportation Acceptability Process. Identifies future transportation corridors in Western Riverside and provides needed environmental documentation to allow preservation of future right-of-ways. • MSHCP. The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan) is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) focusing on the conservation of species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP conserves vulnerable plant and animal species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County and supports economic development.

The MSHCP was adopted in 2003 by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Subsequently, all of the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Parks and Open-Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, Riverside County Transportation Commission, California Department of Transportation, California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Department of Fish and Game, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the RCA signed an Implementing Agreement for the MSHCP. The Implementing Agreement includes terms to ensure MSHCP-implementation, defines remedies and recourses should any of the parties of the Agreement fail to perform obligations, and provides assurances that, as long as the MSHCP is being implemented, the Wildlife Agencies will not require additional mitigation from the Permittees.12 The MSHCP serves as an HCP pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan under the NCCP Act of 2001.

The MSHCP streamlines these environmental permitting processes by allowing the participating jurisdictions to authorize “take” of plant and wildlife species identified within the Plan Area. At the same time, Plan implementation provides a coordinated MSHCP Conservation Area and implementation program to preserve biological diversity and maintain the region’s quality of life.

12 The Wildlife Agencies include the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Permittees include all of the other parties to the Implementing Agreement.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 10 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx The MSHCP and the associated Implementing Agreement and Incidental Take Permit collectively determine a set of conservation actions, and the associated responsible parties, that must be taken to meet the terms of the Incidental Take Permit and benefit from the regulatory streamlining and other benefits of the MSHCP. This includes the identification of the responsibilities of the Local Permittees.13
MSHCP Conservation Requirements
The goal of the MSHCP is to enhance and maintain biological diversity and ecosystems processes while allowing future economic growth. The MSHCP calls for an MSHCP Conservation Area of 500,000 acres and focuses on the conservation of 146 species.

Figure 1 State of Conservation in 2003: Conserved Land, Additional Reserve Land to be Acquired, and Total MSHCP Conservation Area Needed
e County
Regional
As shown in Figure 1, when the MSHCP was adopted, existing public and quasi-public conservation lands covered 347,000 acres, leaving a need for 153,000 acres of land, called Additional Reserve Land (ARL), to meet the goals of the MSHCP (see Figure 1). The MSHCP specifies that responsibility for the conservation of the 153,000-acre Additional Reserve Lands is shared by the local development process (97,000 acres) and state and federal purchases (56,000).

13 Local Permittees include the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Park and Open Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, and Riverside County Transportation Commission. 282,000
56,000
338,000
65,000
97,000
162,000347,000
153,000
500,000
0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
2004 Existing
Public/Quasi Public
Land
Acquire: Additional
Reserve Land
Total
Acres
Federal/State Local
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 11 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 4 MSHCP Goals by Area Plan

The MSHCP includes methods to determine whether the goals of the Plan are being met. One of the methods is measuring the extent to which conservation acquisitions are moving toward acquisition goals by each Area Plan.14 Area Plans are established in the County’s General Plan and are used in the MSHCP as a common geographic unit in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP established low, high, and midpoint acquisition goals for each Area Plan based on biological needs. The midpoint acquisition goals for each Area Plan range from 165 to nearly 49,935 acres, as shown in Table 4. The midpoint goals sum to 158,605 which represents 5,605 acres more than are needed to fulfill the MSHCP goals. As a result, acquisitions in some Area Plans can fall below the mid-point targets while the total ARL can still achieve the 153,000-acre goal.

MSHCP Financing Strategy
One of the key requirements of the MSHCP, Implementing Agreement, and Incidental Take Permit (consistent with the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act) is the provision of adequate funding by Local Permittees to the Implementing Entity (the Regional Conservation Authority) to conduct the conservation actions identified in the MSHCP as the responsibility of the Local Permittees.

14 Other geographic units include Rough Steps, city jurisdictions, and Area Plan subunits. For the purposes of this analysis, Area Plans have been selected as the primary unit of analysis because they are the middle-sized unit (smaller than Rough Steps and larger than Area Plan subunits) and have not changed over time (unlike jurisdictions, several of which have incorporated since the adoption of the MSHCP.

Cities of Riverside and Norco 1,756 90 240 165
Eastvale 665 145 290 220
Elsinore 28,946 11,700 18,515 15,110
Harvest Valley / Winchester 820 430 605 515
Highgrove 1,452 345 675 510
Jurupa 5,476 890 1,870 1,380
Lake Mathews / Woodcrest 11,673 3,215 5,470 4,340
Lakeview / Nuevo 14,682 6,650 10,235 8,445
Mead Valley 7,703 1,885 3,635 2,760
Reche Canyon / Badlands 26,000 10,520 15,610 13,065
REMAP 78,423 41,400 58,470 49,935
San Jacinto Valley 32,828 11,540 19,465 15,500
Southwest Area 66,076 22,500 36,360 29,430
Sun City / Menifee Valley 2,059 1,120 1,585 1,355
Temescal Canyon 10,007 3,485 5,800 4,645
The Pass 22,652 8,540 13,925 11,230
Total 311,218 124,455 192,750 158,605
Area Plan Total Area of
Criteria Cells Low End of Goal High End of
Goal Midpoint
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Section 8.0 of the MSHCP addresses “MSHCP Funding/Financing of Reserve Assembly and Management.” This section provides best estimates of Plan implementation costs at the time of Plan adoption, including the local funding commitment – the portion of Plan implementation costs that represents the Local Permittees’ portion of the overall land acquisition, management, monitoring, adaptive management, and Plan administration costs. Section 8.5 describes the Local Funding Program. The Local Funding Program included a mix of funding sources to provide “an equitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP.” The proposed funding sources included Local Development Mitigation Fees, density bonus fees, regional infrastructure project public contributions (including transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects), and landfill tipping fees. Key components of the overall MSHCP implementation and funding strategy are highlighted below:
• The Regional Conservation Authority would implement the MSHCP with funding from different sources.
• The permanent protection of 97,000 acres in Additional Reserve Lands by Year 25 of the Plan (2029) would be achieved through direct purchase of habitat lands by the RCA using local funding and through the HANS dedication process.
15 • Local funding sources would fund the ongoing management and maintenance costs of the local portion of the Additional Reserve Lands acquired through local funding (97,000 acres by end of acquisition period).
• Local funding sources would fund monitoring activities on the pre-Plan local conservation and all the new Additional Reserve Lands (500,000 acers by end of acquisition period). • The permanent protection of 56,000 acres in Additional Reserve Lands by Year 25 would be achieved using state/federal funding sources or contributions. • State and federal funding sources would fund the management and maintenance costs of the State/federal portion of the required Additional Reserve Lands. • Local Development Mitigation Fees (on private development) would fund the Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs that were not funded by other local/regional funding sources or public contributions for public development project mitigation. • The overall permit period was set at 75 years. Once habitat acquisition was completed by Year 25, remaining funds along with newly created revenue sources were to be used to fund

15 Section 6.1.1 of the MSHCP describes the HANS process. The Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) process applied to any property owner applying for a discretionary permit for land within a Criteria Area/Criteria Cell. Under the process, the County determined whether portions of the property are needed for conservation and then may send their evaluation to the RCA for Joint Project Review (JPR). During JPR, the project applicant negotiated the terms of the development and conservation of the project. The applicant also paid fees on the new development.

This approach was refined when a new fee credit policy, adopted in 2016, provided for fee credits where appropriate lands are dedicated.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 13 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx monitoring and management as well as to fund the establishment of an endowment to cover ongoing post-permit costs (beyond Year 75).

Importantly, the MSHCP funding chapter notes that frequent evaluations of the performance of the funding mechanisms and assessments of the funding plan will occur and that any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms will be developed.

MSH CP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources
The original estimated costs and proposed funding sources were documented in the MSHCP and are summarized in Table 5. These were developed based on research and analysis conducted as part of MSHCP development.

As shown, Plan implementation costs over the first 25 years of implementation were estimated at about $950 million in 2004-dollar terms. Key assumptions driving the implementation cost estimates included:
• Dedications. Direct acquisition using local funding sources would be required to acquire 56,000 acres, with 41,000 acres (or 42 percent) of the required local habitat protection coming through HANS dedication.
• Land Cost. Average land value of $13,100 per acre for Additional Reserve Lands purchased by the RCA.
• Management and Monitoring: Management and monitoring costs included three key components as follows: Reserve Management, Adaptive Management, and Biological Monitoring.16
• Program Administration. RCA program administration costs would average about $1.2 million each year in 2004 dollars during the 25-year period where land acquisition was required.
• Cost Distribution. Overall, land acquisition costs were estimated at 77 percent of total implementation costs, with management and monitoring at 20 percent, and program administration at 3 percent (see Figure 2).

16 See Chapter 5 of the MSHCP for a description of these activities.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 5 2004 Estimates: MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources

Total for % of
2004 - 2028 Average Total Cost/
Item (Years 1 - 25) Annual Funding Need
Local Permittee Land Requirements
Preservation Requirement 97,000 acres 3,880 acres na HANS Dedication 41,000 acres 1,640 acres na
Local Permittee Acquisition 56,000 acres 2,240 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs
Land (1) $733,600,000 $29,344,000 76.91%
Management & Monitoring $190,200,000 $7,608,000 19.94%
RCA Staff $30,000,000 $1,200,000 3.15%
Other Costs na na na
Endowment not included not included na
Total Costs $953,800,000 $38,152,000 100.0%
Local Revenues
Private Development Mitigation Fees $539,600,000 $21,584,000 50.1% Density Bonus Fees $66,000,000 $2,640,000 6.1%
Regional Transportation Infra. (2) $250,000,000 $10,000,000 23.2% Local Roads (Measure A) $121,000,000 $4,840,000 (3) 11.2% Tipping Fees (4) $100,000,000 $4,000,000 9.3%
Miscellaneous Revenues (5) $0 $0 0.0%
Total Revenues $1,076,600,000 $43,064,000 100%
(1) Average land value per acre assumed to be $13,100 per acre. (2) Public contributions at specificed % of new road construction. (3) $121 million to be provided over 10 years, so $12.1 million annually over that period. (4) Includes $90 million from El Sobrante Landfill and $10 million from other County landfills. (5) Other potential revenues, including public contributions from other public projects, tipping fees from Eagle Mountain Landfill, and potential new voter-approved regional funding were noted but not estimated.

Source: Chapter 8 of MSHCP; Economic & Planning Systems.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 15 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Figure 2 MSHCP Estimated Annual Costs in Millions, 2004 Dollars

As also shown in Table 5, MSHCP funding from local/regional sources was estimated to be about $1.0 billion in 2004 dollars through Year 25, sufficient to cover the implementation costs over this period. Key assumptions driving the funding estimates included:
• Measure A. Measure A (local sales tax transportation funding measure) would provide $121 million over 10 years in 2004-dollar terms.
• Regional Transportation Funding. Public contributions from regional transportation infrastructure projects would provide an average of $10 million each year or $250 million through Year 25.
• Tipping Fees. Landfill tipping fees would provide about $100 million in revenue over 25 years, about $4 million each year, primarily from the El Sobrante landfill. • Mitigation Fees. Private development fees, including private development mitigation fees and density bonus fees, would generate over $600 million over the first 25 years, about $24 million annually.
• Development Forecast and Participation. The forecast of private development fees was based on a preliminary fee schedule and the forecast of 336,000 new residential units (13,440 units each year) and 371 acres each year of commercial and industrial development.

All new development was assumed to pay the private development mitigation fee with a portion paying the density bonus fee.
• Other Funding Options. Potential additional funding might come through contributions from other local/regional public entities, other landfills, or new voter-approved funding initiatives.
• Funding Distribution. Overall, about 55 percent of the estimated funding was expected to be generated by private development fees, with 45 percent from other funding sources.

Land,
$29.3, 77%
Mangmnt.
&
Monitoring
$7.6 , 20%
RCA Staff,
$1.2 , 3%
$38.1 million total
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 16 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Figure 3 MSHCP Estimated Annual Revenues in Millions, 2004 Dollars

Development Mitigation Fees and Calculation
The MSHCP notes that “new development affects the environment directly through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from Development.” As a result, the cities and County are required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee that was expected to represent one of the primary sources of funding for the implementation of the MSHCP. The MSHCP indicates that the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be adopted under California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the “Mitigation Fee Act”) that “allows cities and counties to charge new development for the costs of mitigating the impacts of new development.”
The MSHCP identified preliminary estimates of Local Development Mitigation Fees and indicated that these mitigation fees were expected to generate the majority of funding for Local Permittee obligations. The MSHCP noted that, under the Mitigation Fee Act, “a nexus study is required to demonstrate that the proposed fee is proportionate to the impacts of new development.” The Mitigation Fee Act also includes a number of reviewing and reporting requirements. The MSHCP also notes that the fee will need to be “reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new development.”
A nexus study entitled “Final Mitigation Fee Nexus Study Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan” was completed on July 1, 2003 (2003/Original Nexus Study). This nexus study conducted a detailed analysis of the costs of implementing the Plan, identified the Local Permittee funding obligations, determined the portion to be funded through the Local Development Mitigation Fee, and made the necessary nexus findings under the Mitigation Fee Act. The MSHCP and 2003 Nexus Study both indicated that all new development in the Western Riverside County Plan Area affects covered species and habitat and so the Local Development Mitigation Fees would apply to all new development in participating jurisdictions in Western Riverside County.

Private
Dev. Mit.

Fees,
$21.6, 50%
Density
Bonus Fees,
$2.6 , 6%
Regional
Transp.

Infra.,
$10.0 , 23%
Local Roads
(Meas. A) ,
$4.8 , 11%
Tipping
Fees, $4.0 ,
10%
$43.3 million total
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 17 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Mitigation Fee Schedule and Adjustments
All local jurisdictions participating in the MSHCP and obtaining coverage for public and private take in their jurisdictions were required to adopt and implement this mitigation fee schedule through ordinance and resolution and then to pass through the fee funding (minus any additional administrative charges) to the RCA to fund MSHCP implementation. Indexed-increases based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area were provided for in the ordinances to allow modest adjustments in mitigation fees to respond to inflationary cost increases. Due to the geographic revision implemented by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, going forward indexed-adjustments will be based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area.

Table 6 shows the original 2004 Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule and current 2021 Fee schedule that reflects periodic inflationary fee adjustments using the indexing process.

Table 6 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule
Fee Category
2004 Fee per unit or
per acre
2021 Fee per unit or per
acre
Residential: Up to 8.0 dwelling
units per acre (DUAC) $1,651 $2,234
Residential: 8.0-14.0 DUAC $1,057 $1,430
Residential: 14.0+ DUAC $859 $1,161
Commercial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606
Industrial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 18 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

3. HABITAT PROTECTION TO DATE AND FUTURE CONSERVATION

SCENARIO
The RCA has achieved substantial levels of habitat protection to date using the funding sources established and the associated variable flows of incoming revenues. The level of habitat protection achieved, because of lower levels of funding and land dedication than expected, has however fallen behind the pace of protection forecast in the Original Nexus Study. This chapter summarizes the achieved protection to (1) establish both the scale of future acquisitions required to meet the overall Additional Reserve Land (ARL) goals, (2) consider the annual pace of habitat protection through acquisitions and dedications in absolute terms and relative to the original MSHCP forecasts, and (3) inform the development of the Conservation Scenario that forms the baseline (project description) for estimating future MSHCP implementation costs and associated funding requirements and updated mitigation fees.

Habitat Protection Accomplishments Through 2019
Between the start of the MSHCP program and the end of 2019, the most recent full calendar year, about 40 percent of the 153,000-acre ARL target has been achieved, totaling almost 62,000 acres in acquisitions, easements, or dedications (see Table 7).17 As shown of the 97,000 acres in Local Permittee ARL obligation about 40,200 acres had been protected by the end of 2019. Of the 56,000 acres in State/Federal ARL obligation, about 21,600 acres have been protected to date.

Table 7 Conservation Through End of 2019

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority MSHCP Annual Reports; RCA information on 2019 purchases; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Conservation Goals and Progress
The MSHCP anticipated that acquisition would take place for 25 years, through the end of 2029, with 97,000 acres conserved through local means and 56,000 acres conserved with State/federal funding. To achieve this goal, an average of 6,120 acres of conservation is required each year,

17 Note that while the MSHCP was adopted in 2004, certain conservation which took place between 2000 and 2003 was counted toward the MSHCP reserve.

Total
Party Need Conserved Conserved Conserved Remaining Need 2000-2003 2004 - 2019 2000 - 2019 2020-2043
Local 97,000 4,531 35,681 40,212 56, 788 State + Fed 56,000 12,408 9,200 21,608 34,392 Total 153,000 16,939 44,881 61,820 91,180

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 19 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx including an average of 3,880 annually from local funding sources/dedications and 2,240 annually from State and federal conservation.

Figure 4 illustrates how steady progress would result in achievement of the ARL goals by 2029.

Figure 5 shows actual progress toward the goals, through 2019. More than 21,000 acres have been conserved through State/federal means, and over 40,000 acres have been conserved through local actions. These totals sum to about 40 percent of the total ARL goal of 153,000 acres. As shown in Figure 5, with 16 years of the 25-year acquisition period completed, the ARL acquisitions have fallen behind the pace forecast in the Original Nexus Study. Protection through the end of 2019 represents 63 percent of the original forecast (65 percent for Local obligations and 60 percent for State/federal obligations). For the Local Permittee obligations, as discussed further below, the lower level of land dedication relative to the original forecasts account for much of the habitat protection gap that has emerged over the last 16 years.

Figure 4 MSHCP Conservation Goals, 2019 and 2029 Goals Highlighted

62,080
97,000
35,840
56,000
0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
MSHCP Goals, 2019 and 2028 Highlighted
Local State/Fed
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 20 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Figure 5 Progress Towards ARL Through End of 2019

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Land Dedications
The MSHCP envisioned a conservation program where land and easements would be purchased by the RCA and land would be dedicated to the RCA through the development process.18 In addition, the potential for no-cost and low-cost donations for tax benefit purposes was also created. The MSHCP did not assume donations or conservation easement acquisitions as part of its financial analysis (this is appropriate given the limited number of such transactions). The MSHCP did, however, anticipate that 41,000 acres would be conserved through dedications, 56,000 acres through purchases on behalf of local permittees, and 56,000 acres through purchases conducted by or funded by federal and State agencies/sources for a total of 153,000 acres.

For the local portion of the goal (97,000 acres), this translates into about 42 percent of the goal conserved via dedications associated with the development review process—called Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS)— and the other 58 percent purchased by the RCA from willing sellers. The level of dedication is a key assumption for the MSHCP implementation cost estimate as each acre dedicated through HANS is one fewer acre which must be conserved through land acquisitions at market values.

The HANS process was established to apply to developments proposed within the Criteria Cells of the MSHCP Study Area. The Criteria Cells represent areas with high conservation values relative to the areas outside of the Criteria Cells. The HANS process was designed to indicate what conservation (dedication) may be needed from new development from a biological needs

18 This process is known as the Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS).

Fed+State Local Total
Acqu. through 2019 21,608 40,212 61,820
Remaining Need 34,392 56,788 91,180
% of 2019 Expected Goal Achieved 60% 65% 63%
% of Total Goal Achieved 39% 41% 40%
60%
65% 63%
39% 41% 40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
Acres
153,000
97,000
56,000
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 21 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx perspective. Subsequent to that technical analysis, applicants could then proceed to the Joint Project Review (JPR) process during which the parties negotiate an implementation plan for the project, consistent with the HANS findings. The applicants would also pay mitigation fees on the actual development. To date, a modest amount of land (less than 1,000 acres) has been conserved via the HANS/JPR method compared to the 26,000 acres that was forecast to have occurred by this point in the MSHCP implementation.

While very little land has been dedicated to the RCA through HANS/JPR, several projects went through the HANS/JPR process and have agreements in place for dedication/conservation of lands, but the start date (if any) for these projects is unknown (i.e., may be far in the future).

These projects cover about 35,000 acres in the Criteria Cells and, under the JPR agreements, have set aside about 30 percent of that total or about 10,000 acres for conservation/dedication.

The adoption of Resolution No. 2016-003 in September 2016 revised the RCA’s fee credit and waiver policy. This resolution indicated that MSHCP fee credit should be provided in exchange for land that contributes to reserve assembly. As a result, after the adoption of this resolution, new development is not be expected to pay mitigation fees and dedicate land in the manner originally envisioned in the MSHCP limiting the likelihood of the types of dedications envisioned in the Original Nexus Study.

Future Conservation Scenario
This updated financial analysis, nexus study, and mitigation fees estimate require a base description of the additional habitat protection required. In subsequent chapters, cost estimates are developed in reference to, and in application to, this conservation scenario to develop the overall implementation costs and the associated funding required, both in aggregate and through time during the land acquisition period of the program. Four questions are of particular importance:

1. Remaining Habitat Protection. The amount of habitat protection required to meet the MSHCP requirements.

2. Dedications. The amount of land dedication assumed to occur through the HANS/JPR process over the habitat protection period and the associated amount of habitat that must be acquired.

3. Time Frame. The period over which habitat protection goals must be met.

4. Land Characteristics. The characteristics of the land to be protected to meet MSHCP requirements (e.g., goals by Area Plan, habitat cores and linkages etc., land use designations and parcel sizes).

The answers to question 1 are provided in the data above (see Table 7). The answer to question 4 is provided in the subsequent chapter on land costs, with illustrative answers coming from RCA data and GIS analysis. The answer to question 2 is addressed below and is based on information on accomplishments to date (described above), discussions with RCA staff, the current Fee Waiver and Credit Policy, and an assessment of realistic opportunities and expectations. Finally, question 3 raises the issue of whether an extension to the MSHCP land acquisition implementation period should be provided. As described below, three different Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 22 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx extension scenarios (5-, 10-, and 15-year extension scenarios) are evaluated, as well as the baseline, “No Extension Scenario,” to indicate the outcomes under different scenarios.

Habitat Protection, Land Dedication, and Conservation Scenarios As shown in Table 8, there is a total of about 91,200 acres of land protection still required to complete the land protection obligations under the MSHCP and to bring the Additional Reserve Lands to 153,000 acres. Of this, the State/federal requirements is for about 34,400 acres, while the Local Permittee requirement is for about 56,800 acres.

The experience of the last 16 years indicates that the MSHCP was overly optimistic in terms of land dedications, assuming that 41,000 acres would be dedicated to the RCA. As noted above, about 10,000 acres of potential future land dedication is associated with a range of previously proposed projects. Based on historical information on actual, dedications agreements on proposed projects, current RCA policy, and consultations with RCA staff, minimal additional dedication is expected or assumed. This analysis, therefore, assumes that the prior agreement concerning dedications, summing to about 10,000 acres, will be secured over the next eight years and prior to the end of the current habitat protection period. Even if the implementation period were extended, no extra land dedication is forecast to occur.

As a result, and as shown in Table 8, a total of about 46,800 acres of Additional Reserve Land acquisition is required by Local Permittees for MSHCP implementation once the forecast of dedications is incorporated. As shown in Table 8, the required average annual pace of habitat protection varies considerably under the different acquisition period extension scenarios, as described below: 19
• Baseline/No Extension Scenario. As currently structured, RCA is required to complete land acquisition by the end of Year 25 of Plan implementation in 2029. This provides nine (9) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 5,200 acres each year. • 5-Year Extension. With a 5-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 30 of Plan implementation in 2034.

This provides fourteen (14) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 3,300 acres each year.
• 10-Year Extension. With a 10-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 35 of Plan implementation in 2039.

This provides nineteen (19) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 2,500 acres each year.

19 As a point of reference, the historical pace of Local Permittee-driven habitat protection has been somewhat above 2,000 acres each year with availability of funding being an important determinant of the pace of acquisition. The pace of State/federal-driven acquisition has averaged about 1,000 acres each year.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 23 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx • 15-Year Extension. With a 15-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 40 of Plan implementation in 2044.

This provides twenty-four (24) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 2,000 acres each year.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 8 Required Acquisition Acres to Achieve ARL Goals

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Entity/Item Through 2019
2020-End of
Acquisition
Period
Years
Remaining
Annual
Conservation
Acres Required Total Acres
State/Federal 21,608 34,392 9 3,821 56,000 Local
HANS Dedication (1) 715 10,000 9 1,111 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 39,497 46,788 9 5,199 86,285 Total Local Conservation 40,212 56,788 9 6,310 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 61,820 91,180 9 10,131 153,000 State/Federal 14 2,457 56,000 Local
HANS Dedication 14 714 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 14 3,342 86,285 Total Local Conservation 14 4,056 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 14 6,513 153,000 State/Federal 19 1,810 56,000 Local
HANS Dedication 19 526 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 19 2,463 86,285 Total Local Conservation 19 2,989 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 19 4,799 153,000 State/Federal 24 1,433 56,000 Local
HANS Dedication 24 417 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 24 1,950 86,285 Total Local Conservation 24 2,366 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 24 3,799 153,000 State/Federal 29 1,186 56,000 Local
HANS Dedication 29 345 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 29 1,613 86,285 Total Local Conservation 29 1,958 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 29 3,144 153,000

NO EXTENSION
10 YEAR EXTENSION
15 YEAR EXTENSION
20 YEAR EXTENSION
5 YEAR EXTENSION
Shading indicates acreage to be acquired with fee revenue.

See above
See above
See above
See above

1. About 10,000 acres of potential future land dedication is associated with a range of previously proposed projects. Based on historical information on actual, dedications agreements on proposed projects, current RCA policy, and consultations with RCA staff, minimal additional dedication is expected or assumed beyond these agreements. This analysis, therefore, assumes that the prior agreements concerning dedications will occur with future dedications summing to about 10,000 acres. The precise timing of these dedications is uncertain, but are assumed to occur over the next eight years. Average annual numbers in this table are shown distributed across the full remaining acquisition period of each extension scenario.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 25 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

4. FORECASTS OF DEVELOPMENT, DEDICATION, FEE PAYMENT
Future development within Western Riverside County will both reduce land available for conservation while also serving as a primary funding mechanism for habitat acquisitions. This chapter identifies forecasts of future growth in Western Riverside County and develops an associated forecast of land development that is a key component of the fee calculation.

Historic Development and HCP Fees
The MSHCP anticipated that 13,000 to 14,000 residential units and about 370 commercial and industrial acres would be developed on average annually. Specifically, between 2005 and 2019, 206,000 residential units were expected in the Plan Area. A review of new units in the Plan Area indicates about 130,000 units were developed over the period (see Figure 6), about 37 percent below the forecast.20 While the substantial volatility in the real estate market over the period (including the housing boom, deep recession, and modest recovery) may explain some of this difference, the slower pace of development means that fee revenues have been similarly constrained relative to the original revenue projections.

Figure 6 Residential Unit Development, Western Riverside County, 2005- 2019

Source: California Department of Finance; MSHCP Projections

20 Actual units developed have been derived from the California Department of Finance (DOF), Demographics Unit information through January 1, 2019. Note that the DOF reports data by city and for the entire Riverside County unincorporated area. Western Riverside’s portion of the total unincorporated area has been derived based on the area’s historic share of unincorporated County, taking into account the incorporations of new cities that occurred in Western Riverside County since MSHCP Plan adoption (Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Menifee, and Wildomar). 0 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000Number of Residential Units
Projected
Actual
76,000
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 26 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Growth Projections
SCAG Forecasts in Context
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)21 representing six counties, 191 cities and more than 18 million residents.

MPOs, such as SCAG are charged under California Senate Bill 375 with developing Sustainable Community Strategies (SCSs) as part of regional transportation plans. SCAG’s SCS includes population, household, and job projections through 2040 by city and unincorporated area. SCAG consults with local governments within the region, including the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) which represents Western Riverside County, to develop the projections.

SCAG adopted the 2012-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy (RTP/SCS) in 2016. The 2016 RTP/SCS forms the basis of the SCAG projections; EPS extrapolated an annual growth rate from the SCAG projections and, assuming consistent development trends through 2050, applied the rate in order to estimate development projections through 2050.

SCAG forecasts for the future, on an annualized basis, were compared with the MSHCP’s original forecast along with historical information (when available) as described further below:
• Residential Development Forecast. Figure 7 shows, for Western Riverside County, the annual residential unit count for SCAG projections through 2050, MSHCP projections through 2029, and residential units produced in Western Riverside County between 2005 and 2019.

As shown, the SCAG projections suggest about 8,750 units each. This is similar to the average annual historic pace of growth between 2005 and 2019 of about 9,260 units, but well below the original MSHCP projections of about 13,400 units each year. Based on the similarity between the historical average and the SCAG forecast, the SCAG forecast is considered a reasonable basis for determining the future pace of residential development and associated residential land development (based on assumed densities of development). • Commercial Development Forecast. The SCAG jobs forecast of about 15,000 jobs each year was converted into an annual gross amount of commercial/industrial development using the employment density and FAR assumptions used in the most recent Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) update documents. As shown in Figure 8, this results in a forecast of about 690 acres of commercial/industrial land development each year (representing an overall average of about 21 jobs per acre of development), considerably above the original MSHCP projections of about 370 acres each year. The higher SCAG number, however, appears reasonable given recent and ongoing trends in Western Riverside County where substantial amounts of new logistics/distribution development have occurred covering substantial land areas and, as such, is considered reasonable as the basis of the future forecast of commercial/industrial land development.

21 Federal law requires that an urbanized area with a population of at least 50,000 be guided by a regional entity known as an MPO. California’s Senate Bill 375 expands the role of the State’s 18 MPOs to include regional plans that help the State reach its greenhouse gas reduction targets by encouraging compact development and new development near public transit.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 27 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Figure 7 New Housing Units per Year, SCAG and MSHCP Projections and Historic Production (2005-2019)
SCAG (2012-2040) and MSHCP Projections (2004-2029) and Historic Production (2005-2019)

Figure 8 Newly Developed Commercial Acres per Year
SCAG (2012-2040) and MSHCP Projections

Note: SCAG job projections converted into acres by EPS
8,747
13,440
9,262
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
SCAG MSHCP Historic
693
371
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800

SCAG MSHCP
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 28 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Forecasts for Fee Calculation
For this fee program update, the SCAG projections are considered a reasonable basis for forecasting future land development. Because all new development is expected to pay the mitigation fee, all of the forecasted household and job growth is converted into a land development forecast that is, in turn, used to calculate the mitigation fees. Table 9 shows SCAG’s overall projections for households and employment in Western Riverside County between 2012 and 2050, and Table 10 shows the implied average annual land development rates, and, in turn, the overall level of residential and commercial/industrial land development that would be expected to occur through the end of the land acquisition period for each of the extension scenarios.22 As shown, all scenarios assume an overall average annual land development of 2,252 acres each year, including 693 acres in commercial/industrial land development and 1,558 acres in annual residential land development.23
• Baseline/No Extension Scenario. Under the no extension scenario, a total of 20,265 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of nine (9) years and would pay the mitigation fees. • 5-Year Extension. Under the 5-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 31,523 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 14 years and would pay the mitigation fees.
• 10-Year Extension. Under the 10-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 42,782 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 19 years and would pay the mitigation fees. • 15-Year Extension. Under the 15-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 54,040 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 24 years and would pay the mitigation fees.

22 Under the MSHCP, all new development is required to pay the mitigation fee and contribute to funding the implementation of the MSHCP except where specifically exempted in the Ordinance. 23 The 1,558 acres of residential land development was derived based on the forecasted 8,747 residential units each year and assumptions concerning distribution by density category and an average density level. More specifically, consistent with the recent TUMF analysis assumptions, 70 percent of new residential units are assumed to be in the low density category (less than 8 units per acre) with an average of 4.5 units/acre, 20 percent are assumed to be the medium density category (8 to 16 units per acre) with an average of 10.8 units/acre, and 10 percent are assumed to be the high density category (over 16 units per acre) with an average of 24.4 units/acre. The unit per acre factors are consistent with those indicated in the Original Nexus Study. The overall implied average residential density is 5.6 units/gross acre.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 29 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 9 Projected Growth in Western Riverside County, through 2050

SCAG
Households Employment
2012 530,970 463,833
2040 Projection 775,882 869,792
2050 Projection (1) 863,350 1,014,777
New Households/Jobs Expected by 2050 332,380 550,944
Average Annual 8, 747 14,499
Western Riverside MSHCP Plan Area
(1) SCAG projections forecast growth through 2040. EPS assumes the annual growth rate from 2012 to 2040 remains constant through 2050 and applies the rate to an additional 10 years in order to project growth through 2050.

Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 30 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 10 Projected Developed Acres in Western Riverside County, by Extension Scenario

Proportionate Share 2020-20281
78,722 Households 130,487 Jobs
New Development to Acres2
Acres of New Development Through 2028 14,026 Acres 6,239 Acres 20,265 Acres Acres per Year 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres
Proportionate Share 2020-20341
122,456 Households 202,979 Jobs
New Development to Acres2
Acres of New Development Through 2034 21,818 Acres 9,705 Acres 31,523 Acres Acres per Year 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres
Proportionate Share 2020-20381
166,190 Households 275,472 Jobs
New Development to Acres2
Acres of New Development Through 2038 29,611 Acres 13,171 Acres 42,782 Acres Acres per Year 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres
Proportionate Share 2020-20431
209,924 Households 347,965 Jobs
New Development to Acres2
Acres of New Development Through 2043 37,403 Acres 16,637 Acres 54,040 Acres Acres per Year 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres
Sources: California Department of Finance; US Census Bureau; Southern California Association of Governments; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Western Riverside MSHCP Plan Area
5 Year Extension
10 Year Extension
15 Year Extension
(1) SCAG forecasts from the 2016 Report have been used for all cities in Western Riverside County. The projections for the entire unincorporated area in Riverside have been split into just the Western part of the County through a review of WRCOG's recent proportion of unincorporated growth, compared to the whole County. (2) Conversion from household projections to residential acres of developed land is based on expected development mix and average residential density by land use type, with an average residential density of 5.6 DUAC. Similarly, conversion from job projections to nonresidential acres of developed land is based on distribution of jobs by workspace type and average employment density by land use type, with an average nonresidential density of 21 jobs per land acre. Residential density assumptions are based on data from the Census and California Department of Finance; Employment density assumptions are based on SCAG data.

Total
No Extension
Residential Non ResidentialSCAG

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 31 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

5. MSHCP IMPLEMENTATION COSTS
This chapter describes the analysis and assumptions that underpin the estimation of the total remaining MSHCP implementation costs in 2019 dollars. Key cost factors evaluated include land costs, management and monitoring costs, administration and professional services costs, and endowment costs. Together these cost components form the total MSHCP implementation costs.

Because the duration allowed for land acquisition and endowment establishment affect several of these cost items, distinct total implementation cost estimates are provided for all scenarios (i.e., Baseline/ No Extension and the three extension scenarios).

Land Costs
Planning-level estimates of the per acre values associated with potential Additional Reserve Land (ARL) acquisitions are a critical input into the estimation of total land acquisition costs associated with Plan implementation. Land acquisition costs represented the majority of the original estimates of MSHCP implementation costs. This chapter provides planning-level estimates of per acre land conservation costs in 2019-dollar terms based on available information. In combination with assumptions concerning the characteristics of the Additional Reserve Lands to be acquired and potential levels of dedication, the per acre land value estimates drive the estimate of overall land acquisition costs.

Actual per acre habitat conservation costs may vary from the average planning-level estimates presented in this chapter for a number of reasons, including differences in the specific characteristics of the actual parcels acquired as well as fluctuations in economic, real estate, and land market conditions over time. Individual transactions will require appraisals to establish their value at the time of acquisition based on parcel characteristics and pertinent market conditions at the time of appraisal. Over time, per acre and overall cost estimates typically change for a number of reasons as discussed further in Chapter 9.

MSHCP/Original Nexus Study
The initial adoption of the mitigation fees was based on a nexus study completed in July 2003 that included a land valuation analysis that was completed in December 2002. The land valuation analysis assumed the acquisition of vacant and unentitled lands in the Criteria Cells.

The land value analysis provided planning-level estimates of per acre land values by grouped land use designation and by Area Plan. Planning-level land value estimates were based on sales comparables. The land value estimates indicated per acre land values that were primarily driven by differentiation in land use category. The land use designation categories represent groupings of the broad number of land use designations present in the Study Area. Table 11 summarizes the per-acre land value ranges and resulting averages. Based on this analysis, an overall weighted average of $13,100 per acre was applied in the MSHCP financial sections in the Original Nexus Study.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 32 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 11 Per-Acre Land Value Estimates—2003 Dollars (2003 Nexus Study) Land Use Designation Value Range Resulting Average *
Open Space $2,500 to $10,000 per acre $ 8,000 per acre
Rural/Agricultural $5,000 to $25,000 per acre $11,000 per acre Community Development $20,000 to $80,000 per acre $45,000 per acre Overall (1) $2,500 to $80,000 per acre Varied (1)
* Per acre values rounded to the nearest 1,000.
(1) Reported overall average land value per acre depends on mix of land types. Number varies by documents, though $13,100 per acre was overall value applied in the MSHCP financing sections.

Source: Original 2003 Nexus Study
RCA Experience to Date
Table 12 summarizes average RCA land acquisition costs to date. Including land purchased shortly before the MSHCP was adopted through the end of 2018, costs for Local Permittee land acquisitions summed to $352.5 million in nominal dollar terms, an average of $9,400 per acre.

However, for the year 2018, about 2,100 acres were acquired at the higher average per acre cost of $13,200 per acre.

Table 12 Local Conservation Costs Through 2018
Item Pre-MSHCP
through 2018
2018
Total Acres Acquired (1) 37,547 2,066
Total Cost (millions) $352.5 $27.4
Cost per Acre (Nominal $s) $9,400 $13,200
(1) Includes all acres purchased; does not include acres conserved via easement.

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority MSHCP Annual Report 2018; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

To date, the overall historical level of per acre land acquisition expenditures is well below the original 2004 per acre land value estimates. The cost of RCA acquisitions during this timeframe were kept relatively low by concentrating more on lower cost parcels (larger parcels in remote areas with limited development potential). In 2018, as in the future, the average cost per acre is expected to be higher than this historical average due to the characteristics of land still needing to be acquired.

New Land Value Analysis and Conclusions
New 2019 per acre land value estimates were developed based on recent historical transactions as reported in the sales comparables sections of appraisals conducted for RCA acquisitions. This data set provided a substantial inventory of over 150 land sales between 2012 and 2017 that supported conclusions concerning per acre land values by key land value characteristic.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 33 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Similar to the Original Nexus Study, land values were determined to be substantially affected by land use designation and by parcel size. Land values were developed for twelve different value categories based on combinations of three land use designations and four different size ranges.

Based on the land valuation data and detailed GIS analysis by RCA staff, parcels were divided into three groups of development potential based on their land use designation:24 • Open Space. Low development potential land use designations included open space, rural mountainous, and rural residential.
• Rural. Medium development potential land use designations include agriculture and rural communities land use designations.
• Community Development. High development potential land use designations include all community development designations, including residential, non-residential, and other community development designations.

In addition to these three land use designation groupings reflecting different levels of development potential, parcels were also divided by parcel size. The land value information indicated a per acre value distinction between the following parcels sizes:
• Parcels less than 5 acres.
• Parcels between 5 and 20 acres.
• Parcels between 20 and 80 acers.
• Parcels over 80 acres.

Based on the analysis of the sales comparables, Table 13 shows the planning level per acre land value by land use designation grouping/size range in 2017 dollars.

Table 13 Planning Level Per Acre Land Value Estimates by Category

24 RCA staff developed a consistent set of land use designation categories across different jurisdictions in the Study Area for the purposes of this study. These formed the basis of the development potential categories.

Land Use Designation
Less than 5
Acres 5 - 19.99 Acres 20 - 79.99 Acres 80 + Acres
Open Space $11,761 $5,091 $3,949 $1,866
Rural $33,363 $11,553 $8,337 $5,531
Community Development $177,414 $76,050 $72,369 $24,335
Sources: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Per Acre Land Value ($ / Acre)1

1. Most land sale comparables used for pricing are from 2013 to 2017 and were converted to 2017 dollars using BLS CPI adjustments for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 34 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx The average land value per acre for future RCA acquisitions is dependent on the different land values per acre as well as the expected distribution of future acquisitions. The actual land to be acquired is uncertain and is dependent on the availability of land through willing sellers.

However, based on the conservation needs by Area Plan, the suitable land available for protection, as well as the specific linkages that must be created between the core reserve areas, RCA staff provided sufficient information for EPS to develop a general expression of parcels by characteristic to support the land value analysis. An illustration of the expected distribution of acres by land use designation and size range is provided in Table 14.

Table 14 Illustrative Distribution of Land Acquisitions by Land Use and Size

Applying the per acre land values in Table 13 to the illustrative land conservation distribution in Table 14 provides an estimate of the aggregate land value, supporting the estimate of the average planning level land value per acre in 2017-dollar terms (see Table 15).

Table 15 Aggregate Land Value of Remaining Areas (2017 dollars)

Land Use Designation
Less than 5
Acres 5 - 19.99 Acres 20 - 79.99 Acres 80 + Acres
Open Space 535 1,531 3,626 4,654 10,346
Rural 1,901 17,241 26,802 29,428 75,371
Community Development 638 1,707 3,613 4,384 10,342
Total Purchases by Acreage 3,074 20,479 34,041 38,466 96,059

1. Conservation scenario analysis was conducted in 2017 so overall acres acquired more than those required as of end of 2019.

Sources: RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Total
Conservation Scenario (Acres) (1)
Land Use Designation
Less than 5
Acres 5 - 19.99 Acres 20 - 79.99 Acres 80 + Acres
Open Space $6,292,633 $7,795,633 $14, 319,467 $8,682,942 $37,090,674 Rural $63,411,345 $199,183,566 $223,437,526 $162,777,034 $648,809,470 Community Development $113,198,910 $129,817,405 $261,456,200 $106,682,740 $611,155,254 Total Cost of Purchases $182,902,887 $336,796,603 $499,213,192 $278,142,716 $1,297,055,399 % of Total 14% 26% 38% 21% 100%

1. This table is the average land value per acre multiplied by the Conservation Scenario. See Table E-1 and E-2.

Sources: RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Total
Land Comparables by Acres
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 35 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx As shown in Table 15, the aggregate land value of the approximately 96,000 acres remaining to be protected as part of the MSHCP as of 2017 is estimated at about $1.3 billion in 2017 dollars.

This represents an average land value of about $13,500 per acre. To convert this land value into 2019 dollars terms (similar to the rest of the analysis), EPS indexed the value to about $14,300 per acre in 2019-dollar terms.25
Other Costs — Administration, Management , and
Monitoring
Program administration, reserve management, and reserve monitoring are required functions that require annual funding. The forecasts for each of these cost categories are described below.

Administration and Professional Service Costs
The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority is responsible for implementing the MSHCP. Since 2004, RCA staff members have directed the acquisition, management, and monitoring of the local portion of the Additional Reserve Land (ARL) required by the MSHCP, monitored State and federal Public/Quasi-Public lands and the State and federal portions of the ARL, and undertook all of the administrative tasks associated with maintaining the permit.

Costs categorized in this fee study under MSHCP administration include all RCA staff costs and other costs like building rents and average expenditures on non-acquisition related professional services that are not anticipated to vary as the size of the ARL increases. The forecast for the acquisition period assumes that these costs will remain at approximately $4.2 million in constant 2019 dollars, increasing with inflation but not increasing as the size of the ARL grows (see Table 16). This includes salaries and benefits of about $2.3 million annually and about $1.5 million in professional services, supplies, and other costs.

25 Two years of inflation (2017 – 2019) based on by BLS CPI adjustment for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metro Area.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 36 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 16 Administrative and Professional Services Costs

Management and Monitoring
Reserve Management
The MSHCP describes reserve management activities focused on maintaining and improving habitat conditions and ecosystem functions including habitat and landscape-based activities and species-specific activities. For the purposes of this analysis, the average per acre cost estimate for Reserve Management as reported in the RCA actual spending for FY 2018-19 has been used to inform cost projections through the full acquisition period. Because RCA staff and relevant contractors have indicated that the current spending on staff capacity is not adequate to accomplish necessary management with existing land holdings, additional staffing and associated expenditures have been added to the current reserve management expenditures. Specifically, three new full time equivalent (FTE) positions are added to the current 2019 spending for reserve management. Overall, the 2019 per acre reserve management cost of $25.39 per acre was adjusted to $32.70 per acre (2019 dollars) to account for three new mid-level park ranger FTEs. While as of the end of 2019 about 40,200 acres were under management, ultimately, reserve management activities will cover the entire 97,000 acres to be acquired by the RCA.

Biological Monitoring
The purpose of biological monitoring is to provide Reserve Managers with information and data upon which reserve management decisions will be made. According to the MSHCP, the monitoring program must provide “sufficient, scientifically reliable data for Reserve Managers to assess the MSHCP’s effectiveness at meeting resource objectives and achieving or maintaining a Expenditures
RCA FY16/17- 18/19
3-Year Average of
Actuals
CPI Adjusted to
2019$1
Total Salaries and Employee Benefits $2,219,261 $2,288,495 Professional Services and Supplies
Environmental
Legal $394,320 $406,621
Auditing, Accounting & Financial Services $101,717 $104,891 GIS Services $10,000 $10,312
Personnel Services $13,920 $14,354
Real Estate Services $653,774 $674,169
Other Services $247,979 $255,715
Subtotal $1,421,710 $1,466,062
Other Charges $388,145 $400,254
Total $4,029,116 $4,154,811
Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Bureau of Labor Statistics; (1) Three year average CPI-adjusted by one year, the average of the annual CPI adjustments for the three years.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 37 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx healthy MSHCP Conservation Area in perpetuity.” Unlike the RCA’s reserve management activities which are limited to local ARL acres, the RCA will ultimately be responsible for monitoring all 500,000 acres of the reserve lands mandated under the MSHCP. The acreage currently being monitored totals roughly 408,000 acres. For the purposes of this analysis, the $1.1 million annual cost estimate based on FY 2018-19 actual spending was used to inform cost projections through the full acquisition period. Because current staff capacity is not adequate to accomplish necessary biological monitoring with existing land holdings, to address the additional land acquisitions, two new full time equivalent (FTE) positions are added to the current 2019 spending for reserve monitoring. The 2019 per acre reserve monitoring cost of $2.67 was adjusted to $3.01 (2019 dollars) to account for two new entry-level biologist FTEs. (see Table 17). This constant dollar per acre cost was assumed to apply throughout the period of implementation.

Reserve Management and Biological Monitoring Costs
Table 17 summarizes estimated per acre costs for reserve management and monitoring in 2019 dollars. Applying these per acre costs (in 2019 dollars) to current acreage under management and monitoring projects results in annual costs of $1.32 million and $1.23 million, respectively.

The annual reserve management and biological monitoring costs increase as new acquisitions occur.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 38 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 17 Management and Monitoring Anticipated Costs in 2004 and 2019 Dollars

Endowment Funding
The overall permit period was set at 75 years, ending in 2079. To cover ongoing management and monitoring costs beyond the duration when mitigation fees will be collected, the establishment of a non-depleting endowment is required. In other words, the endowment must be sufficient such that expected average interest revenues (after inflation and transaction costs) can cover the ongoing costs associated with administration, management and monitoring in perpetuity. This section summarizes the estimated cost of establishing this endowment under the different scenarios. A key assumption is that the endowment must be fully established by Reserve Management1
Acres under Management 40,212
Existing Reserve Management Expenses $1,021,000
Additional Staff Capacity Required3 $294,000
Total Reserve Management Expenses $1,315,000
$/Acre $32.70
$/Acre without additional staff capacity $25.39
Biological Monitoring2
Acres being Monitored 408,820
Existing Biological Monitoring Expenses $1,092,000
Additional Staff Capacity Required3 $140,000
Total Biological Monitoring Expenses $1,232,000
$/Acre $3.01
$/Acre without additional staff capacity $2.67
Item Actual FY 2019
Spending

3. Current staff capacity is not sufficient to accomplish necessary management and monitoring. An Expanded staff capacity scenario envisions adding 3 FTE mid- level park rangers to Reserve Management and 2 FTE entry-level biologists to Reserve Monitoring, with salaries and benfits of $98,000 and $70,000 ti l
Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

1. Reserve Management costs include Parks & Open Space contract fees, maintenance of motor vehicles, and HOA dues.

2. Biological Monitoring costs include SAWA contract fees, office and computer supplies, training, private mileage reimbursement, building rent, and rental vehicles/fuel.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 39 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx the end of the land acquisition period as it is assumed that no more mitigation fees will be collected at that time.26
For the purposes of this analysis, we have assumed that habitat management and habitat monitoring costs continue in full, while administration costs are reduced by half following the end of the land acquisition period. All of these costs then continue in perpetuity. As a result and as shown in Table 18, the endowment is sized to cover the expected annual management and monitoring costs and 50 percent of the administration costs, totaling $6.8 million (2019 dollars) once all lands have been acquired.

Table 18 Annual Implementation Cost Estimate (2019$)

Consistent with many regional habitat conservations plans, the average annual net, real (allowing for inflation and institutional fees) interest rate is assumed to be three (3) percent.27 Under all extension scenarios, the total required endowment funding is $225.2 million. Because the longer extension periods provide more time for the accrual of interest revenues, the net endowment cost (that must be funded by mitigation fees) is different for each scenario. Table 19 shows the consistent total endowment funding required by scenario as well as the different levels of aggregate endowment interest and associated net endowment funding requirement. For a detailed time-series accounting of endowment funding by extension scenario, see Appendix II.

26 It is important to note that the RCA has collected a distinct set of endowment funds for situations where specific conservation activities are required over-and-above the core activities covered by this endowment calculation.
27 This assumes that the implementing entity can use investment vehicles that may be not be typical for Riverside County.

Annual Cost
Cost Categories
by Last Year of
Land Acquisition
Period
Adjustment
Ongoing Habitat Management $3,172,063 100% $3,172,063
Ongoing Habitat Monitoring $1,506,776 100% $1, 506,776
Administration1 $4,154,811 50% $2,077,406
Total $8,833,650 $6,756,244

1. Adminsitration includes salaries and benefits, accounting, auditing and reporting, contracts, etc.. Assumes less administration is needed following the land acquisition period; ongoing adminsitrative needs include oversight, auditing and reporting, and board staffing.

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Annual Post-Land
Acquisition Cost
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 40 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 19 Endowment Funding (2019$), by Extension Scenario

Total Implementation Costs
Implementation costs include land costs, administrative and professional services expenses, management and monitoring costs, and the required net endowment funding. The remaining MSHCP implementation costs, as described in detail in the preceding sections, are all estimated in 2019 constant dollar terms. Under the Baseline/ No Extension scenario, as shown in Figure 9, the $702 million in estimated land acquisition costs make up 72 percent of the total implementation cost of $974 million. Administrative costs total about 4 percent of total costs, management and monitoring sum to 3 percent of total implementation costs, and the endowment constitutes 21 percent of total costs.

Figure 9 Comparison of Costs by Category

Total implementation costs vary by extension scenario. Land acquisition costs are the same for all scenarios. Administrative, management and monitoring costs increase the longer the acquisition period is extended, but the endowment funding required decreases the longer the No Extension
5-Year
Extension
10-Year
Extension
15-Year
Extension
Total Endowment Funding Required $225,208,133 $225,208,133 $225,208,133 $225,208,133 (Less) Endowment Interest ($25,695,187) ($40,679,628) ($54,846,349) ($68,206,990) Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 $184,528,506 $170,361,785 $157,001,144 Item
Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Land Acqusition
72%
M&M
3%
RCA Staff
2%
Prof Svcs+Misc
2%
Endowment
21%
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 41 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx acquisition period is extended. As shown in Table 20, total implementation costs range from $890 million to $967 million depending on the extension period. Although total costs over time increase with longer extension periods the per-year implementation costs decrease with longer extension periods, as shown in Table 21. For a detailed time-series of all implementation costs excepting the endowment, see Appendix I.

Table 20 Total Implementation Costs (2019$*), by Extension Scenario

* All costs are provided in constant 2019 dollar terms. Costs will change over time due to inflation and other factors. These changes will be addressed through the fee indexing/ updating process that will include automatic inflation-indexed fee changes annually based on the regional Consumer Price Index and periodic comprehensive updates to the Nexus Study.

Total for Total for Total for T otal for
2020 - 2028 2020 - 2033 2020 - 2038 2020 - 2043
No Extension 5-Yr Extension 10-Yr Extension 15- Yr Extension Land 1
$701,931,902 $701,931,902 $701,931,902 $701,931,902
Management & Monitoring $33,582,193 $51,646,790 $69, 711,387 $87,775,983 RCA Staff 2
$20,596,453 $32,038,927 $43,481,401 $54,923,875
Professional Services and Supplies 2
$13,194,561 $20,524,873 $27,855,185 $35,185,497
Loan Repayment 3
$2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Other Costs 2 4
$3,602,285 $5,603,554 $7,604,824 $9,606,093
Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 $184,528,506 $170,361,785 $157,001,144 Total Costs $974,420,341 $998,274,552 $1,022,946,483 $1,048,424,494 Sources: Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Local Permittee MSHCP
Implementation Costs

1. Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms.

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

3. RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” t otaling $5 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million starting in FY 2018.

4. Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses.

NOTE: In some cases numbers may not perfectly sum due to rounding.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 42 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 21 Average Annual Implementation Costs (2019$), by Extension Scenario

2020 - 2028 2020 - 2033 2020 - 2038 2020 - 2043
No Extension 5-Yr Extension 10-Yr Extension 15- Yr Extension Land 1
$77,992,434 $50,137,993 $36,943,784 $29,247,163
Management & Monitoring $3,731,355 $3,689,056 $3, 669,020 $3,657,333 RCA Staff 2
$2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495
Professional Services and Supplies 2
$1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062
Loan Repayment 3
$222,222 $142,857 $105,263 $83,333
Other Costs 2 4
$400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254
Net Endowment Funding Required $22,168,105 $13,180,608 $8,966,410 $6,541,714 Total Costs $108,268,927 $71,305,325 $53,839,289 $43,684,354

3. RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” t otaling $5 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million starting in FY 2018.

4. Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses.

Average AnnualLocal Permittee MSHCP
Implementation Costs
Sources: Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

1. Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms.

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

NOTE: In some cases numbers may not perfectly sum due to rounding.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 43 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

6. RCA NON-FEE REVENUES
MSHCP Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues
The MSHCP forecast an array of revenue sources, in addition to fee revenue, supporting the conservation program. These sources were anticipated to total about 44 percent of the revenue for the program, including:
• Transportation funding – includes the Measure A sales tax which is authorized through 2039 and other transportation funding sources such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) charged on new development. Note that the MSHCP envisioned up to $121 million of Measure A money to the HCP.
• Other infrastructure projects – funding from this source was not quantified in the MSHCP but reflected the expectation that local public construction projects such as schools, administrative facilities, libraries, jails, and other projects like flood control and utility projects would mitigate the construction through the payment of a per-acre fee. 28 Since
MSHCP adoption, the standard contribution has been three to five percent of total project costs.
• Landfill contributions – Landfill tipping fees have been used in the County since the 1990 for conservation programs. Under county permitting of landfills, the County has committed to divert portions of tipping fees to MSHCP implementation.

Table 22 and Figure 10 summarizes the revenue forecasts under the MSHCP. Including the fee revenues, these sources totaled $1.07 billion or an estimated average almost $43 million per year for 25-years (in 2004 dollars). Excluding fee revenues, a total of $18.84 million in annual revenues were forecast, including Measure A funding, $10 million each year from other transportation projects, and $4.0 million from land fill contributions.

As described further below, at this point, the average annual funding from non-fee revenues sources are well below the MSCHP forecast. Measure A, a voter-approved ½ cent sales tax measure did provide substantial funding as envisioned (though is now fully used/ allocated) and, collectively, the other non-fee funding sources are well beyond what was originally envisioned.

28 See Chapter 8.5.1 Funding Sources in the MSHCP.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 44 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 22 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources

Figure 10 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources

New Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues
Non-fee revenues to the RCA are projected to be $6.85 million annually in 2019 dollars. This estimate was derived from a line by line review of the major revenue items for a 3-year period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19, projections by collection entities (e.g., TUMF revenue), and recent dynamics likely to affect the revenue source (e.g., greater diversion of trash to recycling MSHCP Anticipated Funding Source
Estimate
(millions)
% of
Total
Avg/Yr (millions over 25
years)
Fee Funded Sources:

Cities and County Development Mitigation Fees $539.6 50% $21,584,000 Density Bonus Fees $66.0 6% $2,640,000
Non-Fee Funded Sources $605.6 $24,224,000.0
Public Funding Sources
Local Roads (Measure A) $121.0 11% $4,840,000
Other Transportation $250.0 23% $10,000,000
Other infrastructure Projects unknown 0% $0
El Sobrante Landfill $90.0 8% $3,600,000
County Landfills $10.0 1% $400, 000
Eagle Mountain Landfill unknown 0% $0
New Regional funding unknown 0% $0
Non-Fee Funded Sources $471.0 $18,840,000
Total, Local Funds $1,076.6 100% $43,064,000
Fee funded
56%
Local Roads
11%
Other
Transportation
23%
El Sobrante/Other
County Landfills
10%
Non-Fee Funded
44%
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 45 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx will likely reduce tipping fees). The estimates have been inflated from a three-year average to 2019 dollars, as detailed in Table 23.

Table 23 Annual Non-Fee Revenue Projection (2019$s)

Non-Fee Revenue Item
RCA FY16/17- 18/19
3-Year Average of
Actuals
CPI Adjusted to
2019$
Transportation Mitigation1
TUMF Revenue-Developer Fees $950,000 $979,637
Subtotal $950,000 $979,637
Tipping Fee $3,865,728 $3,986,326
Public Project Mitigation
PSE Mitigation Fee2 NA $500,000
Other Gov MSHCP Infrastructure $284,570 $293,448
Other Gov MSHCP Civic Projects $93,629 $96,550
Flood Control District $293,084 $302,227
Subtotal $671,283 $1,192,225
Other Revenue
Interest and Other Sources $467,073 $481,644
Rents $80,531 $83,043
Joint Project Review Fees $124,762 $128,654
Subtotal $672,365 $693,341
Total Revenue NA $6,851,529

1. All Measure A funding was provided prior to 2020 and the associated obligations have been met.

2. Participating Special Entities fees. This does not include Developer Mitigation Fees.

These fees vary widely year over year, $500,000 is used as an annual average per the recommendation of RCA staff.

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 46 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

7. MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION
The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee is based on a generally similar methodology to the Original Nexus Study that ensures the fee level is proportional to the development impact. This methodology looks at the remaining conservation requirements associated with Local Permittee obligations under the MSHCP and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement, determines the remaining Local Permittee implementation cost, subtracts out reasonable estimates of non-fee revenues and other contributions, to determine the overall fee- funding obligation. This obligation is then divided among the new development forecast to determine the required mitigation fee. In others words, the original 2003 and updated 2020 Local Development Mitigation Fee estimates are the outcome of the following formula (the 2003 and 2020 Nexus Studies differ in their process of allocating funding required between land uses):

1. Implementation Costs
minus

2. Non-Fee Funding
equals

3. Outstanding Funding Required
divided by

4. Development Forecast
equals

5. Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule
Table 24 summarizes the estimated Net Implementation Costs, Expected Acres of Development, and the associated per gross acre mitigation fee. As shown, the average mitigation fee per gross acre decreases with each extension as similar levels of net implementation costs are spread across more development. Tables 25 through 28 provide the detailed calculations that determine the total net MSHCP implementation costs shown in Table 24. As noted in Chapter 1, for residential development, the per-gross-acre fee is translated into a per-unit fee schedule for administrative continuity.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 47 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 24 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees

Fee Per Acre No Extension
5-Year
Extension
10-Year
Extension
15-Year
Extension
Net Cost $912,756,583 $902,353,150 $892,767,438 $883,987,805 Acres of Development
Residential 14,026 21,818 29,611 37,403
Nonresidential 6, 239 9,705 13,171 16,637
Total 20,265 31,523 42,782 54,040
Mitigation Fee per Acre $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 48 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 25 Recommended Fee Level—No Extension

Total for
2020 - 2029
Item (Years 17 - 25) 9 yrs
Local Permittee Land Requirements
Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 6,310 acres na
(less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 1,111 acres na
Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 5,199 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs
Land (1) $701,931,902 $77,992,434 72.0%
Management & Monitoring $33,582,193 $3,731,355 3.4%
RCA Staff (2) $20,596,453 $2,288,495 2.1%
Professional Services and Supplies (2) $13,194,561 $1,466,062 1.4% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $222,222 0.2%
Other Costs (2) (4) $3,602,285 $400,254 0.4%
Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 $22,168,105 20.5% Total Costs $974,420,341 $108,268,927 100.0%
Offsetting Revenues (5)
(exc. Private Development Mitigation)
Public Project Mitigation (6) $10,730,025 $1,192,225 1.4% Transportation Mitigation (7) $8,816,731 $979,637 1.1%
Tipping Fees $35,876,934 $3,986,326 4.6%
Other Revenues (8) $6,240,068 $693,341 0.8%
Total Selected Revenues $61,663,758 $6,851,529 8.0%
Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation
Net Cost $912,756,583 $101,417,398 93.7%
Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection:

Development 2020 - 2028 Annual
Residential Units 79,000 8,778
Residential Acres 14,026 1,558
Non-Residential Acres 6,239 693
Total Acres 20,265 2,252
Mitigation Fee $45,041 per acre
(1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (7) Includes TUMF fees.
(8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees.

Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. % of
Total Cost/
Funding Need
Average
Annual
(6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (3) RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 49 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 26 Recommended Fee Level—5- Year Extension

Total for
2020 - 2034
I
tem (Years 17 - 30) 14 yrs
Local Permittee Land Requirements
Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 4,056 acres na
(less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 714 acres na
Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 3,342 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs
Land (1) $701,931,902 $50,137,993 70.3%
Management & Monitoring $51,646,790 $3,689,056 5.2%
RCA Staff (2) $32,038,927 $2,288,495 3.2%
Professional Services and Supplies (2) $20,524,873 $1,466,062 2.1% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $142,857 0.2%
Other Costs (2) (4) $5,603,554 $400,254 0.6%
Net Endowment Funding Required $184,528,506 $13,180,608 18.5% Total Costs $998,274,552 $71,305,325 100.0%
Offsetting Revenues (5)
(exc. Private Development Mitigation)
Public Project Mitigation (6) $16,691,150 $1,192,225 2.1% Transportation Mitigation (7) $13,714,915 $979,637 1.7% Tipping Fees $55,808,564 $3,986,326 6.9%
Other Revenues (8) $9,706,772 $693,341 1.2%
Total Selected Revenues $95,921,402 $6,851,529 11.8%
Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation
Net Cost $902,353,150 $64,453,796 90.4%
Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection:

Development 2020 - 2033 Annual
Residential Units (4.2 DU/Acres) 122,456 8,747
Residential Acres 21,818 1,558
Non-Residential Acres 9,705 693
Total Acres 31,523 2,252
Mitigation Fee $28,625 per acre
(1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (7) Includes TUMF fees.
(8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees.

Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. % of
Total Cost/
Funding Need
Average
Annual
(6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (3) RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 50 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 27 Recommended Fee Level—10- Year Extension

Total for
2020 - 2039
Item (Years 17 - 35) 19 yrs
Local Permittee Land Requirements
Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 2,989 acres na
(less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 526 acres na
Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 2,463 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs
Land (1) $701,931,902 $36,943,784 68.6%
Management & Monitoring $69,711,387 $3,669,020 6.8%
RCA Staff (2) $43,481,401 $2,288,495 4.3%
Professional Services and Supplies (2) $27,855,185 $1,466,062 2.7% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $105,263 0.2%
Other Costs (2) (4) $7,604,824 $400,254 0.7%
Net Endowment Funding Required $170,361,785 $8,966,410 16.7% Total Costs $1,022,946,483 $53,839,289 100.0%
Offsetting Revenues (5)
(exc. Private Development Mitigation)
Public Project Mitigation (6) $22,652,275 $1,192,225 2.7% Transportation Mitigation (7) $18,613,099 $979,637 2.2% Tipping Fees $75,740,195 $3,986,326 8.9%
Other Revenues (8) $13,173,476 $693,341 1.5%
Total Selected Revenues $130,179,045 $6,851,529 15.3%
Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation
Net Cost $892,767,438 $46,987,760 87.3%
Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection:

Development 2020 - 2038 Annual
Residential Units (4.2 DU/Acres) 166,000 8,737
Residential Acres 29,611 1,558
Non-Residential Acres 13,171 693
Total Acres 42,782 2,252
Mitigation Fee $20,868 per acre
(1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (7) Includes TUMF fees.
(8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees.

Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues.

Average
Annual
(2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.
% of
Total Cost/
Funding Need
(3) RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 51 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx Table 28 Recommended Fee Level—15- Year Extension

Total for
2020 - 2044
I
tem (Years 17 - 40) 24 yrs
Local Permittee Land Requirements
Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 2,366 acres na
(less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 417 acres na
Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 1,950 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs
Land (1) $701,931,902 $29,247,163 67.0%
Management & Monitoring $87,775,983 $3,657,333 8.4%
RCA Staff (2) $54,923,875 $2,288,495 5.2%
Professional Services and Supplies (2) $35,185,497 $1,466,062 3.4% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $83,333 0.2%
Other Costs (2) (4) $9,606,093 $400,254 0.9%
Net Endowment Funding Required $157,001,144 $6,541,714 15.0% Total Costs $1,048,424,494 $43,684,354 100.0%
Offsetting Revenues (5)
(exc. Private Development Mitigation)
Public Project Mitigation (6) $28,613,400 $1,192,225 3.2% Transportation Mitigation (7) $23,511,283 $979,637 2.6% Tipping Fees $95,671,825 $3,986,326 10.7%
Other Revenues (8) $16,640,181 $693,341 1.9%
Total Selected Revenues $164,436,689 $6,851,529 18.4%
Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation
Net Cost $883,987,805 $36,832,825 84.3%
Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection:

Development 2020 - 2043 Annual
Residential Units 210,000 8,750
Residential Acres 37,403 1,558
Non-Residential Acres 16,637 693
Total Acres 54,040 2,252
Mitigation Fee $16,358 per acre
(1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (7) Includes TUMF fees.
(8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees.

Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (3) RCA has “Other Long Term Obligations” totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

Average
Annual
% of
Total Cost/
Funding Need

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 52 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

8. MITIGATION FEE ACT (NEXUS) FINDINGS
Mitigation fees are utilized in California to finance public facilities necessary to mitigate impacts stemming from new development. In 1987, the California Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act to provide a framework for the application and administration of such fees. Current prevailing practice among the majority of approved and permitted regional multiple-species Habitat Conservation Plans is that any habitat mitigation fees are to be adopted by the relevant jurisdictions (cities and Counties) consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act.29 As discussed further in Chapter 9, the adoption of fees under the Mitigation Fee Act includes a number of auditing and reporting requirements.

The Mitigation Fee Act, defined in California Government Code Sections 66000 to 66025, requires all public agencies to document five findings when establishing or increasing a fee as a condition for new development. These findings were made when the Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fees were first justified and established.30 This Chapter of the Western Riverside Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study was prepared to describe how the proposed increase in the Local Development Mitigation Fee satisfies the five statutory findings required by the Mitigation Fee Act and is based on the appropriate nexus between new development and the imposition of a mitigation fee. The five statutory findings required for the establishment of a mitigation fee are summarized in the sections below and supported by the technical analysis in the prior chapters of this Study.

Purpose of Fee
Identify the purpose of the fee. (66001(a)(1))
The purpose of the Local Development Mitigation Fee is to contribute to the funding required to implement the MSCHP and, as a result, help maintain the incidental take permits for new private and public development in Western Riverside County under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Maintaining the incidental take permit is necessary to allow for future development, and without the development community paying for the cost of the MSHCP, individual applicants will need to apply independently for development approval under federal and State law if the project impacts a threaten or endangered species. The federal Endangered Species Act specifically requires that the applicant for incidental take permit “ensure that adequate funding for the plan will be provided.”
31 In addition, the Local Development Mitigation Fee helps provide the regional benefit of streamlined economic development in Western Riverside County as well as

29 In addition to the current Western Riverside County habitat mitigation fee, see also the Coachella Valley habitat mitigation fee, the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Fee, and the East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP mitigation fee. 30 See the Final Mitigation Nexus Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, published July 1, 2003.
31 See Section 1539(a)(2)Biii of the federal Endangered Species Act.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 53 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx the provision of contiguous open spaces that will serve as a community amenity to residents, workers, and visitors.

Use of Fee Revenues
Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specific in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged. (66001(a)(2)).

The MSHCP is the public document that outlines the actions required as a whole and the particular set of actions required by the Local Permittees (and the Regional Conservation Agency as their agent) to obtain incidental take permits— associated with State and federal Endangered Species Act requirements—for new public and private development in Western Riverside County.

Failure to meet the requirements of the MSHCP will result in an inability to obtain or maintain incidental take permits through the MSHCP, which would require future development to secure individual take authorization if the project impacts a threaten or endangered species.

Revenues from the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be used, in conjunction with other local and regional funding sources, to fund the conservation actions identified as the responsibility of Local Permittees in the MSHCP. The revenue from the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be used to help fund the appropriate habitat acquisition (land acquisition and associated transaction costs), maintenance and monitoring of habitat land (preserve management, monitoring, and adaptive management), and program management, administration, and oversight activities and costs.
32 Chapter 3 of this report describes the Local Permittee conservation requirements, progress to date, and the remaining actions required under the MSHCP.

Relationship
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (66001(a)(3)).

The implementation of the MSHCP, and the mitigation fee as a fundamental part of it, will benefit all new development by mitigating their collective impacts on covered species and associated habitat. All new public and private development in the Plan area will affect habitat and species either directly, indirectly, or as a cumulative effect. New infrastructure development, for example, in addition to its direct effects, will support new development on other parcels and other locations in the Plan Area. Similarly, new private development will require new infrastructure and also result in additional demand for new developments through linkages—for

32 Consistent with the interpretation applied to the majority of permitted and approved regional, multiple-species Habitat Conservation Plans in California and guidance from RCA Counsel, the Local Development Mitigation Fee is assumed to fund its proportionate share (as determined by the technical analysis and constrained by the statutory requirements) of applicable MSHCP implementation costs including, but also limited to, habitat acquisition costs (and associated transaction costs), the costs of managing and monitoring the habitat preserves in perpetuity, and the administrative and other costs of managing the overall program.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 54 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx example, the need for new housing to accommodate new workers at commercial developments or the need for new retail developments to serve new residents at residential developments.

In other words, all new development in Western Riverside County will benefit from the incidental take permits obtained through the MSHCP and via the use of the mitigation fee revenues.

In addition, the incidental take permits are necessary to permit any future development within the Plan Area, and in order to obtain or maintain such incidental take permits, the MSHCP must be fully funded. Because funding the MSHCP is required in order to allow for future development under the MSHCP, there is a direct relationship between the proposed use of the mitigation fee and development within the Plan Area.

Need
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (66001(a)(4)).

Without new development, no MSHCP would be necessary and no further habitat conservation would be required under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. To allow for any future development under the Plan, the MSHCP must be fully funded. New development in the Plan Area, as noted above, will directly, indirectly, or cumulatively affect species and habitat in Western Riverside County. Because of this, development of the MSHCP was undertaken to provide a regional, streamlined approach to benefit future development of all types in Western Riverside County, including the development and improvements envisioned under the numerous General Plans and the Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The requirements of the MSHCP (habitat acquisition, management and monitoring, program administration) are a direct result of the regional approach to mitigation that is engendered by all new development in the Plan Area under the pertinent environmental regulations. Meeting the requirements of the MSHCP is necessary to obtain the necessary federal authorization to develop within the Plan Area.

Proportionality
Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. (66001(b)).

The MSHCP includes detailed conservation requirements based on the scientific evaluations that form the basis of the MSHCP. Based on these evaluations, conservation responsibilities were allocated between the Local Permittees and other agencies, such as the State and federal governments. The Local Development Mitigation Fee appropriately provides funding towards the fulfillment of the Local Permittee conservation requirements. Furthermore, the Local Permittee obligations are not fully funded through the Local Development Mitigation Fee revenues. Other local and regional funding sources, such as the Measure A sales tax and tipping fees, provide additional mitigation and/or offsetting revenues that reduce the overall cost allocation to the Local Development Mitigation Fee Program. In addition, consistent with the relationship between new development in Western Riverside County and the need for the public facilities (conservation program) described above, proportional attribution between new development is ensured Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 55 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx through the determination of a consistent per gross acre Local Development Mitigation Fee.33 As a result, the Local Development Mitigation Fee level calculations are carefully determined to fund only the proportionate (or less than) conservation costs attributable to the new development on which the fee is imposed and to allocate the fee levels proportionally across all new development. It is this process of careful calculation based on the requirements of the MSHCP that is the subject of a substantial portion of this Nexus Study (see Chapters 2 through 7).

33 Determining habitat mitigation fees on a gross acre basis is the clearest way of ensuring proportionate cost allocations among new developments and is a common practice among adopted Habitat Conservation Plans. For purposes of implementation/administrative consistency, for residential uses, the per-gross-acre fee is translated into per unit fees for different density categories.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 56 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx

9. FEE IMPLEMENTATION
The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee must be implemented consistent with the MSHCP (and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement) as well as the California Mitigation Fee Act. A detailed set of guidance is included in the Fee Implementation Handbook to support clarity and specificity in the implementation of the updated fee program by Local Permittees. The sections below summarize some of the key implementation and administration actions to be consistent with the requirements.

Adoption of Revised LDMF
• Consistent with the MSHCP and associated documents, each Local Permittee (i.e., all participating jurisdictions) must adopt an updated LDMF ordinance and a fee resolution establishing the revised fee level as prescribed by the Mitigation Fee Act. • Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, the revised ordinance and associated fee resolution will become effective after a public hearing and 60 days. • RCA Legal Counsel will prepare a Fee Update Ordinance and Resolution to facilitate the consistent adoption of the updated LDMF by Local Permittees.

Securing Supplemental Funding
The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee is set at the level that would cover the Local Permittee cost obligations once expected non-fee revenues are subtracted out. To the extent any discounts/exemptions are provided to new Western Riverside County development below the updated fee level, additional funding will be required to backfill the fee revenue losses. To the extent, these revenues do not make up for any fee discounts provided, other sources of funding will need to be sought by the RCA and the Local Permittees to fulfill their Plan obligations. At the same time, if new substantial funding sources become available to the RCA for Local Permittee obligations, the funding required through fees may decrease, in turn reducing the required fee levels through a new update.

Annual Review
The Mitigation Fee Act (at Gov. C. §§ 66001(c), 66006(b)(1)) stipulates that each local agency that requires payment of a fee make specific information available to the public annually within 180 days of the last day of the fiscal year. In this case, the RCA can play this role on behalf of the Local Permittees. This information includes the following:
• A description of the type of fee in the account.
• The amount of the fee (the mitigation fee schedule).
• The beginning and ending balance of the fund.
• The amount of fees collected and interest earned.
• Identification of the improvements constructed.
• The total cost of the improvements constructed.
• The fees expended to construct the improvement.
• The percentage of total costs funded by the fee.

Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 57 C:\Users\ktraynor\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\YAAP6MDD\NexusStudy_Final_23Oct2020.docx If sufficient fees have been collected to fund specific improvement cost, the agency must specify the approximate date for the cost of that improvement. Because of the dynamic nature of growth and MSHCP implementation costs and consistent with current practice, the RCA should continue to monitor progress towards MSHCP goals. The overall adequacy of the fee revenues and other available funding in meeting these goals should be reviewed annually.

Surplus Funds
The Mitigation Fee Act also requires that if any portion of a fee remains unexpended or uncommitted in an account for 5 years or more after deposit of the fee, the RCA, acting for the Local Permittees, shall make findings once each year (1) to identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put, (2) to demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged, (3) to identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements, and (4) to designate the approximate dates on which the funding identified in (3) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate fund (§66001(d)).

If adequate funding has been collected for specific investments, an approximate date must be specified as to when the cost of the investment will be incurred. If the findings show no need for the unspent funds, or if the conditions discussed above are not met, and the administrative costs of the refund do not exceed the refund itself, the local agency that has collected the funds must refund them (Gov. C §66001(e)(f)).

Annual and Periodic Updates
Consistent with the current practice, the Fee Ordinance should allow an automatic annual adjustment to the fees based on the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Consumer Price Index (CPI) or a similar inflation factor. In addition, a more comprehensive update should be conducted required periodically. The Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be reviewed periodically by the RCA (every five years is recommended) to identify any necessary refinements to the Local Development Mitigation Fees to ensure adequate funding to implement the MSHCP. Under certain circumstances, the RCA may wish to conduct a Nexus Study update sooner than after five years. For example, to the extent there are significant and unexpected changes in implementation costs, in the level of non-fee funding, and/ or the level of fee-paying private development over time, a more immediate fee update may be appropriate.

APPENDIX I:

Detailed Time Series of Implementation Costs
All Implementation Costs Over Time – No Extension

Factors 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cost Items 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 ACRES
Land Acuisition Costs
Land Acquisition (Annual)
Local 6,310 6,310 6, 310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 Total Local 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 6,310 State/Fed 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 Total 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 10,131 Land Acquisition (Cumulative)
Local 1 45,272 50,332 55,391 60,451 65,511 70,571 75,630 80,690 87,000 State/Fed 25,429 29,251 33, 072 36,893 40,715 44,536 48,357 52,179 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 Total 71,951 82,082 92,213 102,344 112,476 122,607 132,738 142,869 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs
Monitoring Management
State/ Federal
PQP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 25,429 29,251 33,072 36,893 40,715 44,536 48,357 52,179 56,000 Total 307,429 311,251 315,072 318,893 322,715 326,536 330,357 334,179 338,000 Local
PQP RCA Non-RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 46,522 52,832 59,141 65,451 71,761 78,071 84,380 90,690 97,000 Total 111,522 117,832 124,141 130,451 136,761 143,071 149,380 155,690 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 46,522 52,832 59,141 65,451 71,761 78,071 84,380 90,690 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 418,951 429,082 439,213 449,344 459,476 469,607 479,738 489,869 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars)
Land Acquisition Costs
Local, ARL, Annual $14,288 $/Acre $72, 294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $90,154,055 Land Transaction Costs 5% of acquisition costs $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $4,507,703 Total, Land Acquisition Costs $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75, 908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $94,661,758 Local, ARL, Cumulative $75,908,768 $151,817,536 $227, 726,304 $303,635,072 $379,543,840 $455,452,608 $531,361,376 $607,270,144 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs
Management, Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1, 521,340 $1,727,681 $1,934,021 $2,140,361 $2,346,702 $2,553,042 $2,759,382 $2,965,723 $3,172,063 Management Cumulative $1,521,340 $3,249,021 $5, 183,042 $7,323,403 $9,670,105 $12,223,147 $14,982,530 $17,948,252 $21,120,315 Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1, 262,531 $1,293,061 $1,323,592 $1,354,122 $1,384,653 $1,415,184 $1,445,714 $1,476,245 $1,506,776 Monitoring Cumulative $1,262,531 $2,555,592 $3, 879,184 $5,233,306 $6,617,959 $8,033,143 $9,478,857 $10,955,102 $12,461,878 Endowment Costs
Net Endowment Funding, Annual $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22, 168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative $22,168,105 $44,336,210 $66, 504,316 $88,672,421 $110,840,526 $133,008,631 $155,176,736 $177,344,842 $199,512,947 Administrative Costs 2
RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2, 288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment 3 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400, 254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299

TOTAL ALL COSTS
TOTAL Annual $106,015,555 $106,252,426 $105, 489,297 $105,726,168 $105,963,039 $106,199,910 $106,436,781 $106,673,652 $125,663,513 TOTAL Cumulative $106,015,555 $212,267,981 $317,757,279 $423,483,447 $529,446,486 $635,646,396 $742,083,177 $848,756,829 $974,420,341

1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number.

3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed.

End of:

Reserve Summary Financial Responsibility
Habitat Lands/

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

All Implementation Costs Over Time – 5 Year Extension

Factors 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Cost Items 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 ACRES
Land Acuisition Costs
Land Acquisition (Annual)
Local 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Local 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 State/Fed 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 Total 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 Land Acquisition (Cumulative)
Local 1 43,018 45,825 48,631 51,437 54,243 57,050 59,856 62,662 66,719 70,775 74,831 78,887 82,944 87,000 State/Fed 24,065 26,521 28,978 31,434 33,891 36,347 38,804 41,261 43,717 46,174 48,630 51,087 53,543 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 68,333 74,846 81,359 87,871 94,384 100,897 107,410 113,923 120,436 126,949 133,461 139,974 146,487 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs
Monitoring Management
State/ Federal
PQP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 24,065 26,521 28,978 31,434 33,891 36,347 38,804 41,261 43,717 46,174 48,630 51,087 53,543 56,000 Total 306,065 308,521 310,978 313,434 315,891 318,347 320,804 323,261 325,717 328,174 330,630 333,087 335,543 338,000 Local
PQP RCA Non-RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 44,268 48,325 52,381 56,437 60,493 64,550 68,606 72,662 76,719 80,775 84,831 88,887 92,944 97,000 Total 109,268 113,325 117,381 121,437 125,493 129,550 133,606 137,662 141,719 145,775 149,831 153,887 157,944 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 44,268 48,325 52,381 56,437 60,493 64,550 68,606 72,662 76,719 80,775 84,831 88,887 92,944 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 415,333 421,846 428,359 434,871 441,384 447,897 454,410 460,923 467,436 473,949 480,461 486,974 493,487 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars)
Land Acquisition Costs
Local, ARL, Annual $14,288 $/Acre $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 Land Transaction Costs 5% of acquisition costs $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 Total, Land Acquisition Costs $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 Local, ARL, Cumulative $42,100,997 $84,201,995 $126,302,992 $168,403,990 $210,504,987 $252,605,985 $294,706,982 $336,807,979 $397,661,967 $458,515,954 $519,369,941 $580,223,928 $641,077,915 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs
Management, Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1,447,647 $1,580,295 $1,712,942 $1,845,589 $1,978,237 $2,110,884 $2,243,532 $2,376,179 $2,508,826 $2,641,474 $2,774,121 $2,906,768 $3,039,416 $3,172,063 Management Cumulative $1,447,647 $3,027,942 $4,740,884 $6,586,474 $8,564,710 $10,675,595 $12,919,126 $15,295,305 $17,804,131 $20,445,605 $23,219,726 $26,126,494 $29,165,910 $32,337,973 Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1,251,627 $1,271,254 $1,290,880 $1,310,507 $1,330,134 $1,349,761 $1,369,388 $1,389,015 $1,408,641 $1,428,268 $1,447,895 $1,467,522 $1,487,149 $1,506,776 Monitoring Cumulative $1,251,627 $2,522,880 $3,813,761 $5,124,268 $6,454,402 $7,804,163 $9,173,551 $10,562,566 $11,971,207 $13,399,476 $14,847,371 $16,314,893 $17,802,041 $19,308,817 Endowment Costs
Net Endowment Funding, Annual $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative $13,180,608 $26,361,215 $39,541,823 $52,722,430 $65,903,038 $79,083,645 $92,264,253 $105,444,860 $118,625,468 $131,806,076 $144,986,683 $158,167,291 $171,347,898 $184,528,506 Administrative Costs 2
RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment 3 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual Costs $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355

TOTAL ALL COSTS
TOTAL Annual $63,135,690 $63,287,964 $62,440,239 $62,592,513 $62,744,787 $62,897,061 $63,049,335 $63,201,610 $82,106,873 $82,259,148 $82,411,422 $82,563,696 $82,715,970 $82,868,244 TOTAL Cumulative $63,135,690 $126,423,655 $188,863,893 $251,456,406 $314,201,193 $377,098,254 $440,147,590 $503,349,199 $585,456,073 $667,715,220 $750,126,642 $832,690,338 $915,406,308 $998,274,552

1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number.

3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed.

End of:

Reserve Summary
Financial Responsibility
Habitat Lands/

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

All Implementation Costs Over Time – 10 Year Extension

Factors 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Cost Items 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 ACRES
Land Acuisition Costs
Land Acquisition (Annual)
Local 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 (less) Anheuser Busch purchase 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Local 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 State/Fed 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 Total 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 Land Acquisition (Cumulative)
Local 1 41,951 43,690 45,429 47,167 48,906 50,645 52,384 54,123 57,112 60,100 63,089 66,078 69,067 72,056 75,045 78,033 81,022 84,011 87,000 State/Fed 23,418 25,228 27,038 28,848 30,659 32,469 34,279 36,089 37,899 39,709 41,519 43,329 45,139 46,949 48,760 50,570 52,380 54,190 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 66,619 71,418 76,217 81,016 85,815 90,614 95,413 100,212 105,011 109,809 114,608 119,407 124,206 129,005 133,804 138,603 143,402 148,201 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs
Monitoring Management
State/ Federal
PQP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 23,418 25,228 27,038 28,848 30,659 32,469 34,279 36,089 37,899 39,709 41,519 43,329 45,139 46,949 48,760 50,570 52,380 54,190 56,000 Total 305,418 307,228 309,038 310,848 312,659 314,469 316,279 318,089 319,899 321,709 323,519 325,329 327,139 328,949 330,760 332,570 334,380 336,190 338,000 Local
PQP RCA Non-RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 43,201 46,190 49,179 52,167 55,156 58,145 61,134 64,123 67,112 70,100 73,089 76,078 79,067 82,056 85,045 88,033 91,022 94,011 97,000 Total 108,201 111,190 114,179 117,167 120,156 123,145 126,134 129,123 132,112 135,100 138,089 141,078 144,067 147,056 150,045 153,033 156,022 159,011 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 43,201 46,190 49,179 52,167 55,156 58,145 61,134 64,123 67,112 70,100 73,089 76,078 79,067 82,056 85,045 88,033 91,022 94,011 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 413,619 418,418 423,217 428,016 432,815 437,614 442,413 447,212 452,011 456,809 461,608 466,407 471,206 476,005 480,804 485,603 490,402 495,201 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars)
Land Acquisition Costs
Local, ARL, Annual $14,288 $/Acre $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 Land Transaction Costs 5% of acquisition
costs $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 Total, Land Acquisition Costs $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 Local, ARL, Cumulative $26,086,790 $52,173,581 $78,260,371 $104,347,161 $130,433,952 $156,520,742 $182,607,532 $208,694,323 $253,534,102 $298,373,882 $343,213,662 $388,053,442 $432,893,222 $477,733,002 $522,572,782 $567,412,562 $612,252,342 $657,092,122 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs
Management, Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1,412,740 $1,510,480 $1,608,220 $1,705,961 $1,803,701 $1,901,441 $1,999,181 $2,096,921 $2,194,661 $2,292,402 $2,390,142 $2,487,882 $2,585,622 $2,683,362 $2,781,102 $2,878,843 $2,976,583 $3,074,323 $3,172,063 Management Cumulative $1,412,740 $2,923,220 $4,531,441 $6,237,402 $8,041,102 $9,942,543 $11,941,725 $14,038,646 $16,233,307 $18,525,709 $20,915,851 $23,403,733 $25,989,355 $28,672,717 $31,453,819 $34,332,662 $37,309,245 $40,383,568 $43,555,631 Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1,246,462 $1,260,924 $1,275,386 $1,289,847 $1,304,309 $1,318,771 $1,333,233 $1,347,695 $1,362,157 $1,376,619 $1,391,081 $1,405,542 $1,420,004 $1,434,466 $1,448,928 $1,463,390 $1,477,852 $1,492,314 $1,506,776 Monitoring Cumulative $1,246,462 $2,507,386 $3,782,771 $5,072,619 $6,376,928 $7,695,699 $9,028,932 $10,376,627 $11,738,784 $13,115,403 $14,506,484 $15,912,026 $17,332,030 $18,766,497 $20,215,425 $21,678,815 $23,156,667 $24,648,980 $26,155,756 Endowment Costs
Net Endowment Funding, Annual $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative $8,966,410 $17,932,819 $26,899,229 $35,865,639 $44,832,049 $53,798,458 $62,764,868 $71,731,278 $80,697,687 $89,664,097 $98,630,507 $107,596,917 $116,563,326 $125,529,736 $134,496,146 $143,462,556 $152,428,965 $161,395,375 $170,361,785 Administrative Costs 2
RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment 3 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual Costs $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355 $64,322,166 $68,476,977 $72,631,788 $76,786,599 $80,941,410

TOTAL ALL COSTS
TOTAL Annual $42,867,213 $42,979,415 $42,091,617 $42,203,819 $42,316,021 $42,428,223 $42,540,425 $42,652,627 $61,517,819 $61,630,021 $61,742,223 $61,854,425 $61,966,627 $62,078,829 $62,191,031 $62,303,233 $62,415,435 $62,527,637 $62,639,839 TOTAL Cumulative $42,867,213 $85,846,628 $127,938,245 $170,142,065 $212,458,086 $254,886,309 $297,426,735 $340,079,362 $401,597,181 $463,227,202 $524,969,425 $586,823,850 $648,790,477 $710,869,307 $773,060,338 $835,363,571 $897,779,006 $960,306,644 $1,022,946,483

1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number.

3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed.

Habitat Lands/
End of:

Reserve Summary Financial Responsibility

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

All Implementation Costs Over Time – 15 Year Extension

Factors 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Cost Items 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 ACRES
Land Acuisition Costs
Land Acquisition (Annual)
Local 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Local 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 State/Fed 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 Total 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 Land Acquisition (Cumulative)
Local 1 41,328 42,444 43,561 44,677 45,793 46,909 48,025 49,141 51,508 53,874 56,240 58,606 60,972 63,338 65,705 68,071 70,437 72,803 75,169 77,535 79,902 82,268 84,634 87,000 State/Fed 23,041 24,474 25,907 27,340 28,773 30,206 31,639 33,072 34,505 35,938 37,371 38,804 40,237 41,670 43,103 44,536 45,969 47,402 48,835 50,268 51,701 53,134 54,567 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 65,619 69,418 73,218 77,017 80,816 84,615 88,414 92,213 96,013 99,812 103,611 107,410 111,209 115,008 118,808 122,607 126,406 130,205 134,004 137,803 141,603 145,402 149,201 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs
Monitoring Management
State/ Federal
PQP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 23,041 24,474 25,907 27,340 28,773 30,206 31,639 33,072 34,505 35,938 37,371 38,804 40,237 41,670 43,103 44,536 45,969 47,402 48,835 50,268 51,701 53,134 54,567 56,000 Total 305,041 306,474 307,907 309,340 310,773 312,206 313,639 315,072 316,505 317,938 319,371 320,804 322,237 323,670 325,103 326,536 327,969 329,402 330,835 332,268 333,701 335,134 336,567 338,000 Local
PQP RCA Non-RCA
Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 42,578 44,944 47,311 49,677 52,043 54,409 56,775 59,141 61,508 63,874 66,240 68,606 70,972 73,338 75,705 78,071 80,437 82,803 85,169 87,535 89,902 92,268 94,634 97,000 Total 107,578 109,944 112,311 114,677 117,043 119,409 121,775 124,141 126,508 128,874 131,240 133,606 135,972 138,338 140,705 143,071 145,437 147,803 150,169 152,535 154,902 157,268 159,634 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 42,578 44,944 47,311 49,677 52,043 54,409 56,775 59,141 61,508 63,874 66,240 68,606 70,972 73,338 75,705 78,071 80,437 82,803 85,169 87,535 89,902 92,268 94,634 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 412,619 416,418 420,218 424,017 427,816 431,615 435,414 439,213 443,013 446,812 450,611 454,410 458,209 462,008 465,808 469,607 473,406 477,205 481,004 484,803 488,603 492,402 496,201 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars)
Land Acquisition Costs
Local, ARL,
Annual $14,288 $/Acre $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 Land Transaction
Costs 5% of acquisition
costs $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 Total, Land Acquisition Costs $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 Local, ARL,
Cumulative $16,745,170 $33,490,339 $50,235,509 $66,980,678 $83,725,848 $100,471,017 $117,216,187 $133,961,356 $169,459,515 $204,957,674 $240,455,833 $275,953,992 $311,452,152 $346,950,311 $382,448,470 $417,946,629 $453,444,788 $488,942,947 $524,441,106 $559,939,265 $595,437,424 $630,935,583 $666,433,743 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs
Management,
Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1,392,378 $1,469,755 $1,547,133 $1,624,511 $1,701,888 $1,779,266 $1,856,643 $1,934,021 $2,011,399 $2,088,776 $2,166,154 $2,243,532 $2,320,909 $2,398,287 $2,475,664 $2,553,042 $2,630,420 $2,707,797 $2,785,175 $2,862,553 $2,939,930 $3,017,308 $3,094,685 $3,172,063 Management
Cumulative $1,392,378 $2,862,133 $4,409,266 $6,033,776 $7,735,664 $9,514,930 $11,371,574 $13,305,595 $15,316,993 $17,405,770 $19,571,923 $21,815,455 $24,136,364 $26,534,651 $29,010,315 $31,563,357 $34,193,777 $36,901,574 $39,686,749 $42,549,302 $45,489,232 $48,506,540 $51,601,225 $54,773,288 Monitoring,
Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1,243,449 $1,254,898 $1,266,347 $1,277,796 $1,289,245 $1,300,694 $1,312,143 $1,323,592 $1,335,041 $1,346,490 $1,357,939 $1,369,388 $1,380,837 $1,392,286 $1,403,735 $1,415,184 $1,426,633 $1,438,082 $1,449,531 $1,460,980 $1,472,429 $1,483,878 $1,495,327 $1,506,776 Monitoring
Cumulative $1,243,449 $2,498,347 $3,764,694 $5,042,490 $6,331,735 $7,632,429 $8,944,572 $10,268,163 $11,603,204 $12,949,694 $14,307,633 $15,677,021 $17,057,857 $18,450,143 $19,853,878 $21,269,062 $22,695,694 $24,133,776 $25,583,307 $27,044,286 $28,516,715 $30,000,593 $31,495,919 $33,002,695 Endowment Costs
Net Endowment
Funding, Annual $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 Net Endowment
Funding,
Cumulative
$6,541,714 $13,083,429 $19,625,143 $26,166,857 $32,708,572 $39,250,286 $45,792,000 $52,333,715 $58,875,429 $65,417,143 $71,958,858 $78,500,572 $85,042,286 $91,584,001 $98,125,715 $104,667,429 $111,209,144 $117,750,858 $124,292,572 $130,834,286 $137,376,001 $143,917,715 $150,459,429 $157,001,144 Administrative Costs 2
RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment 3 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual Costs $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355 $64,322,166 $68,476,977 $72,631,788 $76,786,599 $80,941,410 $85,096,221 $89,251,032 $93,405,843 $97,560,654 $101,715,465

TOTAL ALL COSTS
TOTAL Annual $31,077,521 $31,166,348 $30,255,175 $30,344,001 $30,432,828 $30,521,655 $30,610,481 $30,699,308 $49,541,124 $49,629,951 $49,718,777 $49,807,604 $49,896,430 $49,985,257 $50,074,084 $50,162,910 $50,251,737 $50,340,563 $50,429,390 $50,518,217 $50,607,043 $50,695,870 $50,784,697 $50,873,523 TOTAL Cumulative $31,077,521 $62,243,870 $92,499,044 $122,843,046 $153,275,874 $183,797,528 $214,408,009 $245,107,317 $294,648,441 $344,278,392 $393,997,169 $443,804,773 $493,701,203 $543,686,460 $593,760,544 $643,923,454 $694,175,191 $744,515,754 $794,945,144 $845,463,361 $896,070,404 $946,766,274 $997,550,971 $1,048,424,494

1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number.

3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed.

Habitat Lands/
End of:

Reserve
Summary Financial Responsibility

2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars.

APPENDIX II:

Detailed Time Series of Endowment Funding
Annual Cost Estimate for Management and Monitoring, Constant 2019$

Annual Cost
Cost Categories
by Last Year of
Land Acquisition
Period
Adjustment
Ongoing Habitat Management $3,172,063 100% $3,172,063
Ongoing Habitat Monitoring $1,506,776 100% $1,506,776
Administration1 $4,154,811 50% $2,077,406
Total $8,833,650 $6,756,244

1. Adminsitration includes salaries and benefits, accounting, auditing and reporting, contracts, etc.. Assumes less administration is needed following the land acquisition period; ongoing adminsitrative needs include oversight, auditing and reporting, and board staffing.

Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Annual Post-Land
Acquisition Cost
Endowment Funding – No Extension Scenario

Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Post-Permit
New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $9,845 $9,845 $9, 845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 Endowment Fee
Annual Endowment Funding $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 Endowment Balance $22,168,105 $44,336,210 $67,169,359 $90,687,502 $114,911,189 $139,861,586 $165,560,496 $192,030,373 $219,294,346 Annual Interest $0 $665,043 $1,350,038 $2,055,582 $2,782,293 $3,530,804 $4,301,772 $5,095,868 $5,913,787 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $665,043 $2,015,081 $4,070,663 $6,852,955 $10,383,760 $14,685,531 $19,781,399 $25,695,187 Total Endowment $22,168,105 $45,001,254 $68,519,396 $92,743,083 $117,693,481 $143,392,391 $169,862,268 $197,126,241 $225,208,133 Average Annual Post Permit Interest $6,756,244
Assumptions
20,265 impact acres developed
9 year plan
3% interest rate (real, net)
$6,756,244 annual post-permit cost estimate
$9,845 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation
(1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post-permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually.

Endowment Funding – 5 Year Extension Scenario

Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Po st-Permit
New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2, 252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 Endowment Fee
Annual Endowment Funding $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 Endowment Balance $13,180,608 $26,361,215 $39,937,241 $53,920,547 $68,323,353 $83,158,243 $98,438,180 $114,176,514 $130,386,999 $147,083,799 $164,281,502 $181,995,136 $200,240,180 $219,032,574 Annual Interest $0 $395,418 $802,699 $1,222,198 $1,654,282 $2,099,329 $2,557,727 $3,029,877 $3,516,192 $4,017,096 $4,533,027 $5,064,436 $5,611,787 $6,175,559 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $395,418 $1,198,117 $2,420,315 $4,074,598 $6,173,927 $8,731,654 $11,761,531 $15,277,723 $19,294,819 $23,827,846 $28,892,281 $34,504,069 $40,679,628 Total Endowment $13,180,608 $26,756,633 $40,739,940 $55,142,746 $69,977,636 $85,257,572 $100,995,907 $117,206,392 $133,903,191 $151,100,894 $168,814,529 $187,059,572 $205,851,967 $225,208,133 Average Annual Post Permit Interest $6,756,244

Assumptions
31,523 impact acres developed
14 year plan
3% interest rate (real, net)
$6,756,244 annual post-permit cost estimate
$5,854 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation
(1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post-permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually.

Endowment Funding – 10 Year Extension Scenario

Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Po st-Permit New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2, 252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 Endowment Fee
Annual Endowment Funding $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 Endowment Balance $8,966,410 $17,932,819 $27,168,221 $36,680,686 $46,478,524 $56,570,297 $66,964,823 $77,671,185 $88,698,738 $100,057,118 $111,756,249 $123,806,354 $136,217,962 $149,001,918 $162,169,393 $175,731,892 $189,701,266 $204,089,722 $218,909,831 Annual Interest $0 $268,992 $546,054 $831,428 $1,125,363 $1,428,117 $1,739,952 $2,061,143 $2,391,970 $2,732,721 $3,083,695 $3,445,198 $3,817,547 $4,201,065 $4,596,089 $5,002,964 $5,422,046 $5,853,699 $6,298,303 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $268,992 $815,047 $1,646,475 $2,771,838 $4,199,955 $5,939,907 $8,001,051 $10,393,020 $13,125,742 $16,209,437 $19,654,635 $23,472,182 $27,673,247 $32,269,336 $37,272,301 $42,694,347 $48,548,046 $54,846,349 Total Endowment $8,966,410 $18,201,812 $27,714,276 $37,512,114 $47,603,887 $57,998,413 $68,704,775 $79,732,328 $91,090,708 $102,789,839 $114,839,944 $127,251,552 $140,035,508 $153,202,983 $166,765,482 $180,734,856 $195,123,312 $209,943,421 $225,208,133 Average Annual Post Permit Interest $6,756,244

Assumptions
42,782 impact acres developed
19 year plan
3% interest rate (real, net)
$6,756,244 annual post-permit cost estimate
$3,982 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation
(1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post-permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually.

Endowment Funding – 15 Year Extension Scenario

Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2, 252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 Endowment Fee
Annual Endowment Funding $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 Endowment Balance $6,541,714 $13,083,429 $19,821,394 $26,761,499 $33,909,807 $41,272,564 $48,856,204 $56,667,353 $64,712,836 $72,999,684 $81,535,138 $90,326,655 $99,381,917 $108,708,838 $118,315,566 Annual Interest $0 $196,251 $398,390 $606,594 $821,043 $1,041,925 $1,269,435 $1,503,769 $1,745,134 $1,993,739 $2,249,803 $2,513,548 $2,785,206 $3,065,014 $3,353,216 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $196,251 $594,642 $1,201,235 $2,022,278 $3,064,204 $4,333,638 $5,837,407 $7,582,541 $9,576,280 $11,826,083 $14,339,631 $17,124,837 $20,189,851 $23,543,067 Total Endowment $6,541,714 $13,279,680 $20,219,785 $27,368,093 $34,730,850 $42,314,490 $50,125,639 $58,171,122 $66,457,970 $74,993,424 $83,784,941 $92,840,203 $102,167,123 $111,773,852 $121,668,781 Average Annual Post Permit Interest
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Post-Permit
2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252
$2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $128,210,496 $138,402,273 $148,899,805 $159,712,262 $170,849,092 $182,320,028 $194,135,092 $206,304,607 $218,839,209 $3,650,063 $3,955,817 $4,270,743 $4,595,116 $4,929,221 $5,273,349 $5,627,801 $5,992,887 $6,368,925 $27,193,130 $31,148,947 $35,419,689 $40,014,806 $44,944,027 $50,217,377 $55,845,178 $61,838,065 $68,206,990 $131,860,559 $142,358,090 $153,170,547 $164,307,378 $175,778,314 $187,593,377 $199,762,893 $212,297,494 $225,208,133 $6,756,244
(1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post-permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually.

Assumptions
54,040 impact acres developed
24 year plan
3% interest rate (real, net)
$6,756,244 annual post-permit cost estimate
$2,905 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 G-1
Appendix G - TUMF 2016 Program Update Disposition of Network Change Requests

As part of the 2024 update of the TUMF Nexus Study, the list of proposed improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development in the TUMF Network Cost Estimate table included in the previously adopted Nexus Study was reviewed for accuracy. In particular, the Network Cost table was reviewed to ensure the included projects were consistent with the mitigation needs identified by the RivCoM future year no-build traffic conditions.

To assist in the review of the Network Cost Estimate table, participating local jurisdictions, private developers and the Riverside County Transportation Commission were asked to submit requests for changes to the TUMF Network. The various requests for network changes were subsequently reviewed for consistency with the program guidelines for inclusion on the TUMF Network and to determine if future traffic impacts would be sufficient to require mitigation primarily utilizing the RivCoM future no-build scenario outputs to quantify impacts as well as screening the various qualitative measures that have guided the TUMF Network development since program inception.

Based on the findings of the review of the entire TUMF network, elements of specific projects were revised to reflect only necessary network corrections, modifications to project assumptions and to incorporate a limited number of additional improvements.

The preliminary results of the network review and the associated screening of specific requested projects was presented to the WRCOG Public Works Directors Committee (PWC) in August 2023. Updated screening results were presented to the PWC in February 2024 and the findings endorsed confirming the TUMF Network as the basis for the Draft 2024 Nexus Study that was subsequently presented to the PWC for review and comment in April 2024. A matrix summarizing the disposition of the specific project requests received as part of the 2024 TUMF Nexus Update is included as Exhibit G-1 in this Appendix.

With the release of the Draft 2024 Nexus Update Study Report for a formal review period commencing on May 14, 2024, and ending on June 10, 2024, additional comments were provided to WRCOG staff by thirteen participating jurisdictions or other stakeholders. These comments were reviewed by WRCOG staff and responses were provided to each of the parties that submitted comments. The responses included several changes to the TUMF network to remedy typographical errors contained in the draft report, including misreporting in the number of existing lanes, project percent complete and interchange project type for approximately 10 TUMF network segments.

The recommended network revisions were presented to the PWC on August 8, 2024, and are reflected in the TUMF network cost table included in Exhibit H-1.

EXHIBIT G-1
2024 TUMF Nexus Study Update - Network Addition Requests Northwest Zone
City/
County
Street
Name From To Recommendation
Eastvale Hellman River Road Walter Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walter Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Eastvale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Eastvale River Rd Archibald Hellman Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Eastvale Limonite ITS city wide Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Eastvale Hamner ITS city wide Add to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase Eastvale Schliesman ITS city wide Add to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase Eastvale Archibald ITS city wide Add to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase Eastvale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge Bridge length increased to 500' Riverside 3rd Chicago Iowa Do not add - no V/C deficiency and interchange overcrossing reconstructed to 4 lanes in 2006-2007 Riverside La Sierra ITS SR-91 Victoria Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside Madison ITS SR-91 Victoria Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside University ITS Market St Canyon Crest Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside Tyler ITS California Ave Indiana Ave Do not add - no V/C deficiency Riverside Alessandro Blvd ITS Fairview Ave Meridian Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase County Markham St Mockingbird Canyon Wood Rd Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Central Zone
City/
County
Street
Name From To Recommendation
Menifee Garbani Haun Antelope Do not add - no future v/c deficiency Menifee Garbani I-215 interchange Add to network to mitigate future v/c deficiency Menifee Garbani I-215 Menifee Do not add - no future v/c deficiency Menifee Garbani Menifee Briggs Do not add - no future v/c deficiency Menifee Holland City Limits (West) Murrieta Do not add - no future v/c deficiency Menifee Holland Murrieta Bradley Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Menifee Holland Bradley Haun Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Menifee Holland Antelope Muenifee Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency Menifee Scott Haun Menifee Already on TUMF Network
Menifee Scott Menifee Briggs Already on TUMF Network
Menifee Scott Sunset Murrieta Already on TUMF Network
Menifee Briggs Simpson Angler Already on TUMF Network
Menifee Briggs Salt Creek bridge Already on TUMF Network Perris Ethanac Bridge San Jacinto River Already on TUMF Network Unincorporated Grand Ave Briggs Rd SR-79 Do not add - no future v/c deficiency San Jacinto Zone
City/
County
Street
Name From To Recommendation
Hemet Stetson Warren 0.85 Miles w/o Warren Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency San Jacinto 7th St Western Terminus Warren Rd Do not add - no future v/c deficiency San Jacinto 7st St Channel adjacent to Warren bridge Do not add - no future v/c deficiency Pass Zone
City/
County
Street
Name From To Recommendation
Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley Already on TUMF Network - no v/c deficiency Banning Cottonwood I-10 interchange Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home Already on TUMF Network - no v/c deficiency Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge Segment already on TUMF Network - Bridge added Southwest Zone
City/
County
Street
Name From To Recommendation
Lake Elsinore Camino del Norte Summerhill Main Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Lake Elsinore Summerhill Railroad Canyon Greenwald Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Lake Elsinore Nichols I-15 Lake Already on TUMF Network Wildomar Inland Valley Dr I-15 bridge Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Wildomar Palomar Starbuck Washington Already on TUMF Network Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 City Limits (Sunset) Already on TUMF Network Murrieta Orange Springs Parkway Clinton Keith Scott Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Calle del Oso Oro Vineyard Pkwy Washington Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Calle del Oso Oro 1500 w/o Vineyard Pkwy bridge Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Adams Murrieta Hot Springs/Hawthorne Cherry Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Temecula Ynez Road Rancho California Santiago Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Temecula Ynez Road/DePortola Road Santiago Margarita Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Temecula ITS Major Arterials (Winchester, Rancho California, Butterfield Stage, Temecula Pkwy, Margarita, Jefferson City limits Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 H-1
Appendix H - TUMF Network Cost Estimate and Evaluation

For the purpose of calculating the “fair share” fee to be applied to new development under the TUMF program, a planning level cost estimate was developed to reflect the cost to complete improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials to adequately accommodate future traffic growth. The planning level cost estimate was established by applying the unit cost values (presented in Table 4.1) to the proposed changes identified for the future Regional System of Highways and Arterials. The resultant cost value was tabulated for each unique segment of the network, by improvement type, based on the proposed list of improvements recommended following the review of the TUMF Network (as described in Section 4.3, Appendix E and Appendix G ). A separate cost estimate was generated for regional transit improvements based on information provided by RTA and added to the summary table. The TUMF Network cost estimate table is summarized in Table 4.4 of the Nexus Report. The detailed TUMF Network cost estimate table is included in this Appendix as Exhibit H-1. The detailed TUMF transit cost estimate table is included as Table 4.5 of the Nexus Report.

Where existing obligated funding has previously been secured through traditional funding sources to complete necessary improvements to the TUMF Network, the cost of these improvements will not be recaptured from future developments through the TUMF program. As a result, the TUMF network cost was adjusted accordingly to reflect the availability of obligated funds.

WRCOG staff, in consultation with RCTC staff, reviewed the current Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to identify transportation projects on the TUMF network that had previously secured alternate sources of funding. Exhibit H-2 identifies those projects included on the TUMF Network having previously obligated funding.

To account for existing needs in the original TUMF Nexus Study, the cost for facilities identified as currently experiencing LOS E or F was adjusted by extracting the share of the cost to improve the portion of those facilities identified in the 2018 Baseline network scenario with a volume to capacity ratio of greater than 0.90, which is the threshold for LOS E. The adjustment to account for existing need as part of the TUMF Nexus Study provides for the mitigation of incremental traffic growth on those facilities with existing need.

The following approach was applied to account for incremental traffic growth associated with new development as part of the existing need methodology:

1. 1. Facilities with an existing need were identified by reviewing the RivCoM 2018 Baseline scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network and delineating those facilities included on the TUMF Cost Fee Summary Table that have an average directional v/c exceeding 0.90.
a. Weighted directional v/c values were used to determine existing need for network segments, which was calculated by:

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 H-2
i. Determining the length for the portion of each segment (model link), and calculating the ratio of link length to the overall segment length
ii. Generating the average directional v/c for each link, for both directions in AM and PM periods, and multiplying by link/segment length ratio
iii. Determining the maximum peak-period peak-direction v/c for each link, representing the highest directional v/c in either AM or PM
iv. Calculating weighted average v/c for each TUMF segment, based on the sum of all weighted max v/c values of each link within a segment

b. A similar method was used to determine existing need for spot improvements including interchanges, railroad crossings and bridges.

However, no weighting was used in the calculation of existing need for spot improvements. For these facilities, the peak-period peak-direction v/c values (highest directional v/c in either AM or PM) were utilized in the existing need calculation. This was based on the individual link within a network segment where a bridge or railroad crossing is located, or on- and off-ramps in the case of interchanges.

2. Initial costs of addressing the existing need were calculated by estimating the share of a particular roadway segments “new lane” cost, or individual spot improvement cost (including all associated ROW and soft costs).

3. Incremental growth in v/c was determined by comparing the average directional base year v/c for the TUMF facilities (delineated under step one) with the horizon year v/c for the corresponding segments and spot improvements calculated based on the RivCoM 2045 No-Build scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network using the same methodology as the base year v/c.

4. The proportion of the incremental growth attributable to new development was determined by dividing the result of step three with the total 2045 No-Build scenario v/c in excess of LOS E.

5. For those segments experiencing a net increase in v/c over the base year, TUMF will ‘discount’ the cost of existing need improvements by the proportion of the incremental v/c growth through 2045 No-Build compared to the 2018 Baseline v/c (up to a maximum of 100%).

Exhibit H-2 includes a detailed breakdown of the existing highway improvement needs on the TUMF network, including the associated unfunded improvement cost estimate for each segment experiencing unacceptable LOS.

For transit service improvements, the cost to provide for existing demand was determined by multiplying the total transit component cost by the share of future

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 H-3
projected daily bus transit ridership representing existing demand. Exhibit H-3 reflects the calculation of the existing transit need share and the existing transit need cost.

To validate the effectiveness of the TUMF Network improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development in Western Riverside County, the future TUMF Network was evaluated. The proposed improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials were coded on the 2021 existing network derived from RivCoM and the model was run to determine the relative impacts on traffic conditions. To quantify the impacts of the TUMF Network improvements, the various traffic measures of effectiveness described in Section 3.1 for the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No-Build scenarios were calculated for the 2045 TUMF Build network scenario.

The results for VMT, VHT, VHD, and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E) were then compared to the results presented in Table 3.1 for the no-build conditions. The consolidated results are provided in Table 4.6.

EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Ethanac Goetz Murrieta Backbone 0.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac Murrieta I-215 Backbone 0.90 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac I-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Menifee Ethanac Sherman Matthews Backbone 0.61 2 4 0% 1.23 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,388,000 $601,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $347,000 $199,000 $2,674,000 $2,674,000 Central Menifee Ethanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossing Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $105,560,000 Central Menifee Menifee SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson Backbone 2.50 2 4 88% 0.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $678,000 $294,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $170,000 $97,000 $1,307,000 $1,307,000 Central Menifee Menifee Salt Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 315 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,024,000 $0 $0 $302,000 $756,000 $302,000 $4,384,000 $4,384,000 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate Backbone 0.64 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergate Newport Backbone 0.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland Backbone 1.07 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Garbani Backbone 1.03 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Garbani Scott Backbone 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,260,000 $978,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $565,000 $324,000 $4,353,000 $4,353,000 Central Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scott Murrieta City Limit Backbone 0.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Murrieta Backbone 1.81 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Murrieta I-215 Backbone 1.99 4 6 87% 0.52 1 3 0 0 0 0 $586,000 $254,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $147,000 $84,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Central Menifee Newport I-215 Menifee Backbone 1.02 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Menifee Lindenberger Backbone 0.77 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Lindenberger SR-79 (Winchester) Backbone 3.58 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott I-215 Briggs Backbone 1.98 4 6 0% 3.96 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,483,000 $1,941,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,000 $1,121,000 $642,000 $8,635,000 $8,635,000 Central Menifee Scott I-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott Sunset Murrieta Backbone 1.01 2 4 0% 2.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,278,000 $986,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000 $570,000 $326,000 $4,388,000 $4,388,000 Central Menifee Scott Murrieta I-215 Backbone 1.94 2 6 0% 7.77 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,799,000 $3,809,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $880,000 $2,200,000 $1,261,000 $16,949,000 $12,949,000 Central Menifee SR-74 Matthews Briggs Backbone 1.89 4 6 0% 3.79 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,285,000 $1,855,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $429,000 $1,071,000 $614,000 $8,254,000 $8,254,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro I-215 Perris Backbone 3.52 4 6 75% 1.76 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,992,000 $9,574,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $199,000 $498,000 $1,157,000 $13,420,000 $13,420,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason Backbone 2.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach Backbone 0.99 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs Backbone 4.13 2 4 0% 8.26 1 3 0 0 0 0 $9,355,000 $4,049,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $936,000 $2,339,000 $1,340,000 $18,019,000 $18,019,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 Alessandro Backbone 1.67 2 4 0% 3.34 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,785,000 $1,639,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,000 $946,000 $542,000 $7,291,000 $7,291,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Reche Vista Ironwood Backbone 2.09 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead Backbone 0.52 4 4 80% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $11,192,000 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus Backbone 2.00 4 4 25% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Cactus Harley Knox Backbone 3.64 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Vista Country Heacock Backbone 0.44 2 4 0% 0.88 2 2 0 0 0 0 $1,531,000 $4,787,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,000 $383,000 $632,000 $7,486,000 $3,799,000 Central Perris 11th/Case Perris Goetz Backbone 0.30 2 4 0% 0.60 1 2 0 0 0 0 $680,000 $3,269,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $170,000 $395,000 $4,582,000 $4,582,000 Central Perris Case Goetz I-215 Backbone 2.36 2 4 42% 2.74 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,099,000 $14,893,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $310,000 $775,000 $1,799,000 $20,876,000 $20,876,000 Central Perris Case San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 125 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $120,000 $300,000 $120,000 $1,740,000 $1,235,000 Central Perris Ethanac Keystone Goetz Backbone 2.24 0 2 38% 2.78 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,144,000 $1,361,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $314,000 $786,000 $451,000 $6,056,000 $6,056,000 Central Perris Ethanac San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Central Perris Ethanac I-215 Sherman Backbone 0.35 2 4 0% 0.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $789,000 $3,793,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $458,000 $5,316,000 $5,316,000 Central Perris Goetz Case Ethanac Backbone 2.16 2 4 84% 0.69 1 3 0 0 0 0 $782,000 $339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $196,000 $112,000 $1,507,000 $999,000 Central Perris Goetz San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $3,398,000 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) I-215 Perris Backbone 0.87 0 4 41% 2.05 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,324,000 $11,169,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232,000 $581,000 $1,349,000 $15,655,000 $15,655,000 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) I-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) Perris Evans Backbone 1.57 0 4 52% 3.01 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,412,000 $16,398,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $341,000 $853,000 $1,981,000 $22,985,000 $22,985,000 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge Backbone 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Perris Perris Harley Knox Ramona Backbone 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Ramona Citrus Backbone 2.49 4 6 35% 3.24 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,667,000 $1,587,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $367,000 $917,000 $525,000 $7,063,000 $7,063,000 Central Perris Perris Citrus Nuevo Backbone 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Nuevo 11th Backbone 1.75 2 4 74% 0.91 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,028,000 $4,942,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 $257,000 $597,000 $6,927,000 $6,927,000 Central Perris Perris I-215 overcrossing bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona I-215 Perris Backbone 1.44 4 6 77% 0.66 1 2 0 0 0 0 $748,000 $3,595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $187,000 $434,000 $5,039,000 $5,039,000 Central Perris Ramona I-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $7,725,000 Central Perris Ramona Perris Evans Backbone 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona Evans Mid-County (2,800 ft E of Rider) Backbone 2.62 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (4th) Ellis I-215 Backbone 2.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Ethanac SR-74 Keystone Backbone 1.07 0 2 0% 2.14 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,422,000 $1,049,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $606,000 $347,000 $4,666,000 $4,666,000 Central Unincorporated Gilman Springs Alessandro Bridge Road Backbone 5.00 2 4 0% 9.99 2 3 0 0 0 0 $17,389,000 $4,897,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,739,000 $4,347,000 $2,229,000 $30,601,000 $30,601,000 Central Unincorporated Menifee Nuevo SR-74 (Pinacate) Backbone 4.07 2 4 6% 7.65 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,662,000 $3,749,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $866,000 $2,166,000 $1,241,000 $16,684,000 $16,684,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-County Evans Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Backbone 0.77 0 4 0% 3.08 3 3 0 0 0 0 $7,238,000 $1,509,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000 $1,810,000 $875,000 $12,156,000 $12,156,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Pico Avenue Backbone 0.44 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge Road Backbone 5.95 2 6 8% 21.91 1 3 0 0 0 0 $24,800,000 $10,735,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,480,000 $6,200,000 $3,554,000 $47,769,000 $47,769,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $24,960,000 $0 $0 $2,496,000 $6,240,000 $2,496,000 $36,192,000 $36,192,000 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon San Bernardino County Reche Vista Backbone 3.35 2 2 0% 0.00 3 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Vista Reche Canyon Country Backbone 1.22 2 2 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Scott Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) Backbone 3.04 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated SR-74 Ethanac Ellis Backbone 2.72 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco I-15 Temescal Canyon Backbone 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Paseo Grande Lincoln Backbone 2.60 4 4 0% 0.00 3 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 3 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California Backbone 2.81 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill California I-15 Backbone 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River SR-91 Dominguez Ranch Backbone 0.52 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Dominguez Ranch Palisades Backbone 0.56 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Paseo Grande Backbone 2.01 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman San Bernardino County 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Backbone 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $446,000 $45,000 $112,000 $45,000 $648,000 $648,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Cucamonga Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison Backbone 0.87 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $597,000 $60,000 $149,000 $60,000 $866,000 $866,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Harrison Sumner Backbone 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $34,000 $84,000 $34,000 $488,000 $488,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Sumner Scholar Backbone 0.50 2 4 0% 1.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,132,000 $5,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $283,000 $657,000 $7,625,000 $7,625,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Scholar A Street Backbone 0.31 5 6 95% 0.02 1 2 0 0 0 0 $18,000 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $5,000 $10,000 $119,000 $119,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman A Street Hamner Backbone 0.27 4 6 95% 0.03 1 2 0 0 0 0 $31,000 $149,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $8,000 $18,000 $209,000 $209,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR-60 Bellegrave Backbone 1.57 4 6 0% 3.14 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,552,000 $17,071,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $355,000 $888,000 $2,062,000 $23,928,000 $10,461,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Bellegrave Santa Ana River Backbone 3.99 4 6 0% 7.99 1 2 0 0 0 0 $9,041,000 $43,446,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $904,000 $2,260,000 $5,249,000 $60,900,000 $0 Northwest Riverside Alessandro Arlington Trautwein Backbone 2.42 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,662,000 $166,000 $416,000 $166,000 $2,410,000 $2,410,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington La Sierra Magnolia Backbone 5.84 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arlington Magnolia Alessandro Backbone 2.73 4 6 0% 5.46 2 2 0 0 0 0 $9,504,000 $29,713,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $2,376,000 $3,922,000 $46,465,000 $46,465,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Santa Ana River SR-91 Backbone 3.81 4 6 91% 0.69 1 2 0 0 0 0 $776,000 $3,731,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $194,000 $451,000 $5,230,000 $4,392,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren SR-91 Mockingbird Canyon Backbone 3.08 4 6 16% 5.18 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,863,000 $28,174,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $586,000 $1,466,000 $3,404,000 $39,493,000 $21,292,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Wood Trautwein Backbone 0.43 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Trautwein Orange Terrace Backbone 1.27 5 6 22% 0.99 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,124,000 $5,404,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000 $281,000 $653,000 $7,574,000 $7,574,000 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Trautwein Vista Grande Backbone 1.22 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Vista Grande I-215 Backbone 1.26 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco El Sobrante Harley John Backbone 0.86 2 6 0% 3.46 2 3 0 0 0 0 $6,012,000 $1,693,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $601,000 $1,503,000 $771,000 $10,580,000 $9,817,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harley John Harvil Backbone 5.81 2 6 6% 21.83 1 2 0 0 0 0 $24,716,000 $118,776,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,472,000 $6,179,000 $14,349,000 $166,492,000 $166,492,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harvil I-215 Backbone 0.28 4 6 0% 0.57 1 3 0 0 0 0 $643,000 $278,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $161,000 $92,000 $1,238,000 $1,238,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Canyon La Sierra Backbone 3.21 2 6 2% 12.57 3 3 0 0 0 0 $29,533,000 $6,158,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,953,000 $7,383,000 $3,569,000 $49,596,000 $35,953,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 3 3 0 175 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 $0 $0 $336,000 $840,000 $336,000 $4,872,000 $1,907,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco La Sierra El Sobrante Backbone 6.11 2 6 0% 24.44 3 3 0 0 0 0 $57,434,000 $11,976,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,743,000 $14,359,000 $6,941,000 $96,453,000 $96,453,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Mockingbird Canyon Wood Backbone 4.42 4 6 0% 8.84 1 2 0 0 0 0 $10,010,000 $48,104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,001,000 $2,503,000 $5,811,000 $67,429,000 $67,429,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Orange Terrace I-215 Backbone 1.89 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Pass Banning Highland Springs Wilson (8th) Sun Lakes Backbone 0.76 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs I-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $32,516,000 Pass Banning Highland Springs Oak Valley (14th) Wilson (8th) Backbone 0.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley (14th) Backbone 1.53 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) Backbone 3.29 0 2 0% 6.57 1 2 0 0 0 0 $7,439,000 $35,748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $744,000 $1,860,000 $4,319,000 $50,110,000 $50,110,000 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South San Gorgonio bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South UP/Hargrave railroad crossing Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,400,000 $0 $3,640,000 $9,100,000 $3,640,000 $52,780,000 $52,780,000 Pass Beaumont Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 Backbone 1.37 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Oak Valley (San Timoteo Canyon)SR-60 Backbone 0.72 2 4 65% 0.50 1 3 0 0 0 0 $571,000 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $143,000 $82,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $29,561,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero UP railroad crossing Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,600,000 $0 $2,760,000 $6,900,000 $2,760,000 $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero Noble Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 4th Backbone 0.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 California Backbone 1.15 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $7,408,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley I-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $59,773,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley Roberts St Roberts Rd Backbone 0.70 2 4 0% 1.40 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,585,000 $686,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $396,000 $227,000 $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Bellflower Noble Backbone 1.47 0 2 0% 2.94 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,328,000 $1,441,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $333,000 $832,000 $477,000 $6,411,000 $6,411,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Highland Springs Bellflower Backbone 0.44 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Noble Roberts St Backbone 3.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley San Timoteo Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated SR-79 (Lamb Canyon) California Gilman Springs Backbone 5.23 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Warren Sanderson Backbone 1.77 4 6 0% 3.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,011,000 $1,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000 $1,003,000 $575,000 $7,726,000 $7,726,000 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Sanderson State Backbone 2.14 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 Winchester Warren Backbone 2.59 4 6 11% 4.62 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,227,000 $25,117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $523,000 $1,307,000 $3,034,000 $35,208,000 $35,208,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid-County (Ramona) Warren Sanderson Backbone 1.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid-County (Ramona) Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemet Bypass)interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Sanderson State Backbone 2.39 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona State Main Backbone 2.66 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Main Cedar Backbone 2.40 0 4 57% 4.13 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,679,000 $22,485,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $468,000 $1,170,000 $2,716,000 $31,518,000 $26,928,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Cedar SR-74 Backbone 1.10 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni SR-79 (Winchester) Warren Backbone 3.10 4 6 0% 6.20 1 3 0 0 0 0 $7,013,000 $3,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $701,000 $1,753,000 $1,005,000 $13,508,000 $13,508,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni San Diego Aqueduct bridge Backbone 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Bridge Sanderson Backbone 2.95 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Bridge Warren Backbone 2.35 2 4 10% 4.23 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,787,000 $2,072,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $479,000 $1,197,000 $686,000 $9,221,000 $9,221,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-74 Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) Backbone 3.54 4 6 0% 7.07 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,004,000 $3,465,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $2,001,000 $1,147,000 $15,417,000 $15,417,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) SR-74 (Florida) Domenigoni Backbone 3.22 0 2 1% 6.38 1 3 0 0 0 0 $7,217,000 $3,124,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $722,000 $1,804,000 $1,034,000 $13,901,000 $13,901,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) San Diego Aqueduct bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) Domenigoni Winchester Backbone 1.50 0 2 0% 3.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,396,000 $1,470,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 $849,000 $487,000 $6,542,000 $6,542,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (San Jacinto Bypass) Mid-County (Ramona) SR-74 (Florida) Backbone 6.50 0 4 0% 26.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $29,432,000 $12,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,943,000 $7,358,000 $4,217,000 $56,690,000 $56,690,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) Gilman Springs Ramona Backbone 1.58 4 6 0% 3.16 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,582,000 $1,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $358,000 $896,000 $513,000 $6,899,000 $2,555,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $13,440,000 $0 $0 $1,344,000 $3,360,000 $1,344,000 $19,488,000 $7,651,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Domenigoni Keller Backbone 4.90 4 6 13% 8.53 1 2 0 0 0 0 $9,653,000 $46,387,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $965,000 $2,413,000 $5,604,000 $65,022,000 $65,022,000 Southwest Canyon Lake Goetz Railroad Canyon Newport Backbone 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills Goetz Backbone 1.95 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 Canyon Hills Backbone 2.36 6 6 50% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $24,162,000 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith Copper Craft Toulon Backbone 1.31 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith Toulon I-215 Backbone 0.90 4 6 47% 0.95 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,078,000 $466,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000 $270,000 $154,000 $2,076,000 $2,076,000 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith I-215 Whitewood Backbone 0.75 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta French Valley (Date) Murrieta Hot Springs Winchester Creek Backbone 0.24 0 4 0% 0.96 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,087,000 $5,222,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,000 $272,000 $631,000 $7,321,000 $7,321,000 Southwest Murrieta French Valley (Date) Winchester Creek Margarita Backbone 0.61 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Menifee City Limit Keller Backbone 0.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Keller Clinton Keith Backbone 2.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Jefferson Diaz Backbone 0.56 0 2 54% 0.52 1 2 0 0 0 0 $583,000 $2,803,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,000 $146,000 $339,000 $3,929,000 $3,929,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Murrieta Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 420 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $4,032,000 $0 $0 $403,000 $1,008,000 $403,000 $5,846,000 $5,846,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Margarita Ynez Backbone 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Ynez Jefferson Backbone 0.73 0 2 55% 0.66 1 2 0 0 0 0 $744,000 $3,574,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 $186,000 $432,000 $5,010,000 $5,010,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 1 0 0 0 $0 $0 $84,190,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,419,000 $21,048,000 $8,419,000 $122,076,000 $122,076,000 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson Backbone 2.71 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,860,000 $186,000 $465,000 $186,000 $2,697,000 $2,697,000 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Diaz) Cherry Rancho California Backbone 2.14 0 2 93% 0.30 1 2 0 0 0 0 $339,000 $1,630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $85,000 $197,000 $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)Rancho California SR-79 (Front) Backbone 1.48 0 2 15% 2.52 3 2 0 0 0 0 $5,913,000 $13,687,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,478,000 $1,960,000 $23,629,000 $23,629,000 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 3 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)Murrieta Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 3 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Unincorporated Benton SR-79 Eastern Bypass Backbone 2.40 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Whitewood SR-79 Backbone 2.54 0 4 75% 2.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,875,000 $1,245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $719,000 $412,000 $5,539,000 $5,539,000 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Warm Springs Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-74 I-15 Ethanac Backbone 4.97 4 6 9% 9.05 2 3 0 0 0 0 $15,740,000 $4,433,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,574,000 $3,935,000 $2,017,000 $27,699,000 $26,347,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Keller Thompson Backbone 2.47 4 6 9% 4.49 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,079,000 $24,407,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $508,000 $1,270,000 $2,949,000 $34,213,000 $34,213,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Thompson La Alba Backbone 1.82 4 6 0% 3.63 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,112,000 $19,761,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $411,000 $1,028,000 $2,387,000 $27,699,000 $27,699,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) La Alba Hunter Backbone 0.51 4 6 0% 1.03 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,166,000 $5,602,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $292,000 $677,000 $7,854,000 $3,042,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Hunter Murrieta Hot Springs Backbone 1.14 4 6 88% 0.27 1 3 0 0 0 0 $309,000 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000 $77,000 $44,000 $595,000 $442,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 Monte Vista Backbone 0.22 4 6 0% 0.44 2 3 0 0 0 0 $774,000 $218,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $194,000 $99,000 $1,362,000 $1,362,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Monte Vista Sunset Backbone 3.14 2 4 0% 6.29 3 3 0 0 0 0 $14,778,000 $3,081,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,478,000 $3,695,000 $1,786,000 $24,818,000 $24,818,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $24,613,000 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith Palomar I-15 Backbone 0.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith I-15 Copper Craft Backbone 1.96 2 4 58% 1.64 2 3 0 0 0 0 $2,858,000 $805,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $286,000 $715,000 $366,000 $5,030,000 $0 Subtotal Backbone 269.95 318.02 11 8,835 3 7.14 $438,352,000 $682,621,000 $435,330,000 $74,976,000 $136,800,000 $4,901,000 $109,037,000 $272,606,000 $177,298,000 $2,331,921,000 $1,961,707,000 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Briggs Newport Scott Secondary 3.05 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson Secondary 2.54 2 4 73% 1.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,553,000 $672,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $388,000 $223,000 $2,991,000 $2,991,000 Central Menifee Briggs Simpson Old Newport Secondary 1.50 0 2 17% 2.49 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,819,000 $1,220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $282,000 $705,000 $404,000 $5,430,000 $5,430,000 Central Menifee Briggs Salt Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 600 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Menifee Garbani I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $42,483,000 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane Secondary 2.61 2 4 0% 5.22 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,907,000 $2,557,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,477,000 $846,000 $11,378,000 $11,378,000 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanita Secondary 1.36 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Murrieta Bradley Secondary 1.03 2 4 0% 2.06 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,332,000 $11,206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $583,000 $1,354,000 $15,708,000 $15,708,000 Central Menifee Holland Bradley Haun Secondary 0.75 2 4 0% 1.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,698,000 $8,160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $425,000 $986,000 $11,439,000 $11,439,000 Central Menifee Holland Haun Antelope Secondary 0.31 0 4 0% 1.24 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,404,000 $6,746,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $351,000 $815,000 $9,456,000 $9,456,000 Central Menifee Holland I-215 overcrossing bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 350 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $6,720,000 $0 $0 $672,000 $1,680,000 $672,000 $9,744,000 $9,744,000 Central Menifee Holland Antelope Menifee Secondary 0.70 2 4 64% 0.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $571,000 $2,742,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $143,000 $331,000 $3,844,000 $3,844,000 Central Menifee McCall I-215 Aspel Secondary 1.23 4 6 0% 2.46 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,780,000 $1,203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,000 $695,000 $398,000 $5,354,000 $5,354,000 Central Menifee McCall I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee Secondary 0.95 2 4 45% 1.05 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,188,000 $514,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000 $297,000 $170,000 $2,288,000 $2,288,000 Central Menifee Murrieta Ethanac McCall Secondary 1.95 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Murrieta McCall Newport Secondary 2.03 2 4 10% 3.65 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,136,000 $1,790,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,000 $1,034,000 $593,000 $7,967,000 $7,967,000 Central Menifee Murrieta Newport Bundy Canyon Secondary 3.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 Heacock Secondary 2.17 4 6 83% 0.74 1 2 0 0 0 0 $834,000 $4,007,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $83,000 $209,000 $484,000 $5,617,000 $5,617,000 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR-60 Secondary 0.28 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 Eucalyptus Secondary 0.77 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus I-215 Towngate Secondary 1.00 4 6 42% 1.16 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,313,000 $6,309,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,000 $328,000 $762,000 $8,843,000 $8,843,000 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Towngate Frederick Secondary 0.67 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock Secondary 1.01 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitching Secondary 1.01 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitching Moreno Beach Secondary 2.42 4 4 98% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore Secondary 2.28 4 4 47% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Frederick SR-60 Alessandro Secondary 1.63 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele Secondary 2.79 4 4 77% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus Secondary 4.73 4 4 92% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox Secondary 0.74 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood SR-60 Day Secondary 1.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock Secondary 2.01 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle John F Kennedy Oleander Secondary 3.16 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon SR-60 Secondary 1.23 2 4 0% 2.47 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,790,000 $13,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $698,000 $1,620,000 $18,797,000 $18,797,000 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR-60 overcrossing bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 250 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Nason SR-60 Alessandro Secondary 1.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass Ironwood SR-60 Secondary 0.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Ironwood Secondary 2.66 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust Secondary 0.35 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro Secondary 2.75 2 4 5% 5.22 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,907,000 $28,385,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,477,000 $3,429,000 $39,789,000 $39,789,000 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 Eucalyptus Secondary 0.26 2 4 0% 0.52 1 2 0 0 0 0 $589,000 $2,829,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $147,000 $342,000 $3,966,000 $3,966,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Perris Ellis Goetz Evans Secondary 1.27 0 4 14% 4.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,945,000 $2,141,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,000 $1,236,000 $709,000 $9,526,000 $9,526,000 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Ramona Morgan Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Morgan Rider Secondary 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Rider Placentia Secondary 0.56 2 2 79% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Placentia Nuevo Secondary 1.52 0 4 51% 2.98 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,370,000 $1,459,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $337,000 $843,000 $483,000 $6,492,000 $6,492,000 Central Perris Evans Nuevo Ellis Secondary 2.03 0 4 0% 8.12 1 3 0 0 0 0 $9,192,000 $3,979,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $919,000 $2,298,000 $1,317,000 $17,705,000 $17,705,000 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $7,680,000 $0 $0 $768,000 $1,920,000 $768,000 $11,136,000 $11,136,000 Central Perris Evans I-215 bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Perris Goetz Lesser Ethanac Secondary 2.04 2 4 12% 3.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,073,000 $1,763,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $407,000 $1,018,000 $584,000 $7,845,000 $7,845,000 Central Perris Harley Knox I-215 Indian Secondary 1.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Indian Perris Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Perris Redlands Secondary 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo I-215 Murrieta Secondary 1.36 4 6 18% 2.23 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,519,000 $12,107,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $252,000 $630,000 $1,463,000 $16,971,000 $16,971,000 Central Perris Nuevo I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $19,736,000 Central Perris Nuevo Murrieta Dunlap Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,267,000 $981,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $567,000 $325,000 $4,367,000 $4,367,000 Central Perris Nuevo Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) I-215 Ethanac Secondary 1.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $21,835,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) I-215 Mt Vernon Secondary 1.66 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $11,912,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,800,000 $0 $1,380,000 $3,450,000 $1,380,000 $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Central Unincorporated Ellis Post SR-74 Secondary 2.65 2 4 0% 5.30 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,996,000 $2,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $1,499,000 $859,000 $11,550,000 $11,550,000 Central Unincorporated Mount Vernon/CETAP CorridorCenter Pigeon Pass Secondary 0.61 2 4 46% 0.65 3 3 0 0 0 0 $1,537,000 $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $154,000 $384,000 $186,000 $2,582,000 $2,582,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo Dunlap Menifee Secondary 2.00 2 4 0% 4.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,536,000 $1,963,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $454,000 $1,134,000 $650,000 $8,737,000 $2,505,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Central Unincorporated Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Mount Vernon Secondary 3.95 0 2 74% 2.05 3 3 0 0 0 0 $4,827,000 $1,006,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $483,000 $1,207,000 $583,000 $8,106,000 $8,106,000 Central Unincorporated Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis Secondary 0.44 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit Secondary 3.20 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Redlands San Timoteo Canyon Locust Secondary 2.54 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona 6th SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 4.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Auto Center Railroad SR-91 Secondary 0.48 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco Bedford Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.15 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Hidden Valley Norco Hills McKinley Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Lincoln Parkridge Ontario Secondary 3.20 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia 6th Sherborn Secondary 0.46 4 6 0% 0.92 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,047,000 $5,032,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 $262,000 $608,000 $7,054,000 $6,419,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Temescal Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $3,580,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Sherborn Rimpau Secondary 0.53 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia Rimpau Ontario Secondary 1.17 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Grand Ontario Secondary 0.88 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Ontario Foothill Secondary 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Hidden Valley Parkridge Secondary 0.35 4 6 0% 0.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $789,000 $3,791,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $458,000 $5,314,000 $4,389,000 Northwest Corona Main Parkridge SR-91 Secondary 0.91 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main SR-91 S. Grand Secondary 0.81 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Hidden Valley Promenade Secondary 0.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Promenade SR-91 Secondary 0.33 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 0.31 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Arlington Channel bridge Secondary 0.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 100 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario I-15 El Cerrito Secondary 0.88 4 6 0% 1.76 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,997,000 $9,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $499,000 $1,159,000 $13,451,000 $13,451,000 Northwest Corona Ontario Lincoln Buena Vista Secondary 0.32 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Buena Vista Main Secondary 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Main Kellogg Secondary 0.78 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Kellogg Fullerton Secondary 0.32 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Fullerton Rimpau Secondary 0.42 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Rimpau I-15 Secondary 0.67 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Auto Club Buena Vista Secondary 2.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,600,000 $0 $2,760,000 $6,900,000 $2,760,000 $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Northwest Corona Railroad Buena Vista Main (at Grand) Secondary 0.58 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona River Corydon Main Secondary 2.28 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Serfas Club SR-91 Green River Secondary 0.96 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Eastvale Archibald Remington River Secondary 3.40 4 4 82% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,333,000 $233,000 $583,000 $233,000 $3,382,000 $3,382,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Mission Bellegrave Secondary 3.03 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Bellegrave Amberhill Secondary 0.20 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,000 $14,000 $34,000 $14,000 $199,000 $199,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Amberhill Limonite Secondary 0.71 2 6 55% 1.28 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,447,000 $626,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $362,000 $207,000 $2,787,000 $2,787,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Limonite Schleisman Secondary 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $684,000 $68,000 $171,000 $68,000 $991,000 $991,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Schleisman Santa Ana River Secondary 0.82 2 6 23% 2.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,873,000 $1,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $287,000 $718,000 $412,000 $5,533,000 $3,675,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walters Secondary 0.55 2 4 90% 0.06 1 2 0 0 0 0 $62,000 $299,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $16,000 $36,000 $419,000 $419,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Walters River Secondary 1.41 2 4 0% 2.82 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,192,000 $15,341,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $319,000 $798,000 $1,853,000 $21,503,000 $21,503,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 275 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,640,000 $0 $0 $264,000 $660,000 $264,000 $3,828,000 $3,828,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 Eastvale Gateway Secondary 0.29 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $199,000 $20,000 $50,000 $20,000 $289,000 $289,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Eastvale Gateway Hamner Secondary 0.26 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $18,000 $44,000 $18,000 $255,000 $255,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Hamner Sumner Secondary 1.00 4 6 75% 0.50 1 3 0 0 0 0 $568,000 $246,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $142,000 $81,000 $1,094,000 $1,094,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Sumner Harrison Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $343,000 $34,000 $86,000 $34,000 $497,000 $497,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Harrison Archibald Secondary 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) Secondary 1.15 0 4 78% 1.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,146,000 $496,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $287,000 $164,000 $2,208,000 $2,208,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600,000 $0 $0 $960,000 $2,400,000 $960,000 $13,920,000 $0 Northwest Eastvale River Hellman Archibald Secondary 0.75 2 4 48% 0.78 1 2 0 0 0 0 $883,000 $4,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,000 $221,000 $513,000 $5,948,000 $5,948,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Armstrong San Bernardino County Valley Secondary 1.53 2 4 34% 2.02 2 3 0 0 0 0 $3,518,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $352,000 $880,000 $451,000 $6,192,000 $6,192,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Bellegrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Van Buren Secondary 0.29 2 4 63% 0.21 1 3 0 0 0 0 $241,000 $104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $60,000 $35,000 $464,000 $464,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville Bellegrave Secondary 1.82 0 2 90% 0.36 1 3 0 0 0 0 $412,000 $178,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 $103,000 $59,000 $793,000 $793,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda Philadelphia SR-60 Secondary 1.05 4 6 67% 0.69 1 3 0 0 0 0 $786,000 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $113,000 $1,515,000 $989,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda SR-60 Limonite Secondary 2.95 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite I-15 Wineville Secondary 0.47 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Wineville Etiwanda Secondary 0.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Etiwanda Van Buren Secondary 2.73 2 4 75% 1.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,547,000 $670,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $387,000 $222,000 $2,981,000 $2,981,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Van Buren Clay Secondary 0.79 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Clay Riverview Secondary 2.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Rubidoux Santa Ana River Secondary 1.19 2 4 0% 2.38 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,690,000 $1,164,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $269,000 $673,000 $385,000 $5,181,000 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Santa Ana River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,000 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600,000 $0 $0 $960,000 $2,400,000 $960,000 $13,920,000 $6,204,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission Milliken SR-60 Secondary 2.10 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission SR-60 Santa Ana River Secondary 7.24 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Riverview Limonite Mission Secondary 0.95 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux Pine Mission Secondary 2.90 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $9,051,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Valley Armstrong Mission Secondary 0.48 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Parkridge Mountain Secondary 0.26 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Mountain Hamner Secondary 0.26 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 2nd River I-15 Secondary 1.39 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th Hamner California Secondary 1.71 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $3,489,000 Northwest Norco Arlington Crestview Fairhaven Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 1.99 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,254,000 $976,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $564,000 $323,000 $4,342,000 $4,342,000 Northwest Norco California Arlington 6th Secondary 1.05 2 4 5% 2.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,262,000 $10,870,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $566,000 $1,313,000 $15,237,000 $12,525,000 Northwest Norco Corydon River 5th Secondary 1.46 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $23,040,000 $0 $0 $2,304,000 $5,760,000 $2,304,000 $33,408,000 $11,455,000 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River Hidden Valley Secondary 3.25 4 6 0% 6.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $7,362,000 $35,378,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $736,000 $1,841,000 $4,274,000 $49,591,000 $49,591,000 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley I-15 Norco Hills Secondary 1.46 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley Hamner I-15 Secondary 0.19 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Norco Corydon Hamner Secondary 1.20 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco North California Crestview Secondary 0.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco River Archibald Corydon Secondary 1.14 2 4 90% 0.23 1 2 0 0 0 0 $259,000 $1,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 $65,000 $150,000 $1,743,000 $1,109,000 Northwest Riverside 14th Market Martin Luther King Secondary 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 1st Market Main Secondary 0.08 2 2 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd SR-91 I-215 Secondary 1.34 3 4 81% 0.25 1 2 0 0 0 0 $288,000 $1,385,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $72,000 $167,000 $1,941,000 $1,941,000 Northwest Riverside 3rd BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $30,560,000 Northwest Riverside Adams Arlington SR-91 Secondary 1.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 Lincoln Secondary 0.54 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $3,262,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington Fairhaven La Sierra Secondary 0.61 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Buena Vista Santa Ana River Redwood Secondary 0.30 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Martin Luther King Central Secondary 0.95 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Central Country Club Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Country Club Via Vista Secondary 0.93 2 4 12% 1.63 2 3 0 0 0 0 $2,839,000 $799,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $710,000 $364,000 $4,996,000 $1,593,000 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Via Vista Alessandro Secondary 0.68 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Chicago I-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.22 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 0.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Alessandro SR-91 Secondary 2.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Van Buren Magnolia Secondary 3.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Alessandro Spruce Secondary 3.43 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Spruce Columbia Secondary 0.75 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia Main Iowa Secondary 1.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $9,050,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa Center 3rd Secondary 2.26 4 6 12% 3.97 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,494,000 $21,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,000 $1,124,000 $2,609,000 $30,272,000 $30,272,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa 3rd University Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa University Martin Luther King Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside JFK Trautwein Wood Secondary 0.48 2 4 10% 0.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $976,000 $422,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 $244,000 $140,000 $1,880,000 $1,880,000 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Arlington SR-91 Secondary 3.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra SR-91 Indiana Secondary 0.19 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $133,000 $13,000 $33,000 $13,000 $192,000 $192,000 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Indiana Victoria Secondary 0.78 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $536,000 $54,000 $134,000 $54,000 $778,000 $778,000 Northwest Riverside Lemon (NB One way) Mission Inn University Secondary 0.08 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Van Buren Jefferson Secondary 2.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Jefferson Washington Secondary 1.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Washington Victoria Secondary 1.43 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison SR-91 Victoria Secondary 0.86 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $588,000 $59,000 $147,000 $59,000 $853,000 $853,000 Northwest Riverside Madison BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,800,000 $0 $1,380,000 $3,450,000 $1,380,000 $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF Railroad Tyler Secondary 2.70 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Tyler Harrison Secondary 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Harrison 14th Secondary 5.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Main 1st San Bernardino County Secondary 2.19 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Market 14th Santa Ana River Secondary 2.59 2 4 76% 1.24 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,409,000 $6,771,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 $352,000 $818,000 $9,491,000 $9,491,000 Northwest Riverside Martin Luther King 14th I-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.22 4 6 29% 3.15 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,567,000 $17,144,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $357,000 $892,000 $2,071,000 $24,031,000 $24,031,000 Northwest Riverside Mission Inn Redwood Lemon Secondary 0.79 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Redwood (SB One way) Mission Inn University Secondary 0.08 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Trautwein Alessandro Van Buren Secondary 2.19 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 0.43 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $21,814,000 Northwest Riverside Tyler Magnolia Hole Secondary 0.27 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Hole Wells Secondary 1.06 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Wells Arlington Secondary 1.35 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University Redwood SR-91 Secondary 0.86 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $593,000 $59,000 $148,000 $59,000 $859,000 $859,000 Northwest Riverside University SR-91 I-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.08 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,425,000 $143,000 $356,000 $143,000 $2,067,000 $2,067,000 Northwest Riverside Victoria Lincoln Arlington Secondary 0.16 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Madison Washington Secondary 0.52 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Washington Victoria Hermosa Secondary 2.06 2 4 14% 3.54 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,011,000 $19,274,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000 $1,003,000 $2,329,000 $27,018,000 $27,018,000 Northwest Riverside Wood JFK Van Buren Secondary 0.70 2 4 0% 1.40 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,585,000 $686,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $396,000 $227,000 $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Northwest Riverside Wood Van Buren Bergamont Secondary 0.11 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Bergamont Krameria Secondary 0.39 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Unincorporated Cantu-Galleano Ranch Hamner Wineville Secondary 0.94 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Dos Lagos (Weirick) Temescal Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.17 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Cerrito I-15 Ontario Secondary 0.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Sobrante Mockingbird Canyon Cajalco Secondary 1.05 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Washington Scottsdale Secondary 0.12 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Scottsdale Cajalco Secondary 1.19 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra Victoria El Sobrante Secondary 2.23 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra El Sobrante Cajalco Secondary 2.36 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Mockingbird Canyon Van Buren El Sobrante Secondary 3.41 2 4 0% 6.82 2 3 0 0 0 0 $11,860,000 $3,340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,186,000 $2,965,000 $1,520,000 $20,871,000 $20,871,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon El Cerrito Tuscany Secondary 0.65 2 4 20% 1.03 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,800,000 $507,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $450,000 $231,000 $3,168,000 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Tuscany Dos Lagos Secondary 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dos Lagos Leroy Secondary 1.10 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Leroy Dawson Canyon Secondary 1.89 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dawson Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon I-15 Park Canyon Secondary 2.02 2 4 10% 3.63 3 3 0 0 0 0 $8,533,000 $1,779,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $853,000 $2,133,000 $1,031,000 $14,329,000 $14,329,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail Secondary 2.55 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Washington Hermosa Harley John Secondary 3.96 2 4 26% 5.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,638,000 $2,874,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $664,000 $1,660,000 $951,000 $12,787,000 $12,787,000 Northwest Unincorporated Wood Krameria Cajalco Secondary 2.99 2 4 4% 5.75 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,509,000 $2,817,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $651,000 $1,627,000 $933,000 $12,537,000 $12,537,000 Pass Banning 8th Wilson I-10 Secondary 0.54 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Lincoln Sunset SR-243 Secondary 2.01 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey I-10 8th Secondary 1.70 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 8th Highland Springs Secondary 3.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning SR-243 I-10 Wesley Secondary 0.62 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Home Sunset Secondary 1.00 0 4 0% 4.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,528,000 $21,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,000 $1,132,000 $2,629,000 $30,502,000 $30,502,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Montgomery Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Springs Highland Home Secondary 1.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset Ramsey Lincoln Secondary 0.28 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Home 8th Secondary 2.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home Secondary 1.01 4 4 100% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Viele Pennsylvania Secondary 1.28 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Pennsylvania Highland Springs Secondary 1.10 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 6th I-10 Highland Springs Secondary 2.24 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Desert Lawn Champions Oak Valley (STC) Secondary 0.99 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Highland Springs Pennsylvania Secondary 1.13 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Pennsylvania Oak View Secondary 1.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Oak View I-10 Secondary 0.65 4 4 50% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $62,401,000 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) UP Railroad Tukwet Canyon Secondary 2.94 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) Tukwet Canyon I-10 Secondary 2.58 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 6th 1st Secondary 0.53 2 4 18% 0.86 1 2 0 0 0 0 $978,000 $4,699,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 $245,000 $568,000 $6,588,000 $6,588,000 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Bryant County Line Avenue L Secondary 0.38 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa County Line I-10 Secondary 0.80 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Calimesa County Line 7th Bryant Secondary 1.83 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Calimesa Desert Lawn Palmer Champions Secondary 1.42 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Avenue L Condit Secondary 1.86 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Condit Roberts Secondary 0.85 2 4 0% 1.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,926,000 $9,253,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $193,000 $482,000 $1,118,000 $12,972,000 $12,972,000 Pass Calimesa Singleton I-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $0 Pass Calimesa Tukwet Canyon Roberts Rd Palmer Secondary 0.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County Secondary 2.81 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon San Bernardino County UP Railroad Secondary 5.65 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon UP Railroad railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,400,000 $0 $3,640,000 $9,100,000 $3,640,000 $52,780,000 $52,780,000 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Acacia Menlo Secondary 0.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Domenigoni Stetson Secondary 1.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson RR Crossing Acacia Secondary 0.42 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Stetson RR Crossing Secondary 0.58 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Menlo Esplanade Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Warren Cawston Secondary 1.02 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Columbia Ramona Secondary 2.58 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74/SR-79 (Florida) Cawston Columbia Secondary 4.03 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Domenigoni Chambers Secondary 1.31 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Chambers Stetson Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Florida Esplanade Secondary 1.74 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Stetson Florida Secondary 1.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Cawston State Secondary 2.52 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Warren Cawston Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,262,000 $979,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $566,000 $324,000 $4,357,000 $4,357,000 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Esplanade Domenigoni Secondary 5.02 2 4 9% 9.14 1 3 0 0 0 0 $10,345,000 $4,478,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $2,586,000 $1,482,000 $19,926,000 $19,926,000 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Salt Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade Mountain State Secondary 2.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade State Warren Secondary 3.53 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Sanderson Ramona Esplanade Secondary 3.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (North Ramona) State San Jacinto Secondary 1.02 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) North Ramona Blvd 7th Secondary 0.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) 7th SR-74 Secondary 2.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Ramona Esplanade Secondary 1.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Gilman Springs Quandt Ranch Secondary 0.76 2 4 0% 1.52 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,722,000 $745,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $172,000 $431,000 $247,000 $3,317,000 $3,317,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto State San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Quandt Ranch Ramona Secondary 0.70 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Warren Ramona Esplanade Secondary 3.47 2 4 11% 6.18 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,993,000 $3,027,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $699,000 $1,748,000 $1,002,000 $13,469,000 $13,469,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Sanderson State Secondary 2.54 2 4 0% 5.09 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,761,000 $2,494,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $826,000 $11,097,000 $11,097,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Massacre Canyon Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 100 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 $0 $0 $96,000 $240,000 $96,000 $1,392,000 $1,392,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) SR-74 (Florida) Domenigoni Secondary 3.23 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN % COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Southwest Lake Elsinore Corydon Mission Grand Secondary 1.53 2 4 50% 1.53 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,732,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $173,000 $433,000 $248,000 $3,336,000 $3,336,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Diamond Mission I-15 Secondary 0.24 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Franklin (integral to Railroad Canyon Interchange) I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Lincoln Toft Secondary 1.29 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Toft SR-74 (Riverside) Secondary 0.86 2 4 6% 1.61 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,824,000 $789,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $182,000 $456,000 $261,000 $3,512,000 $3,512,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake I-15 Lincoln Secondary 3.25 2 4 28% 4.68 2 2 0 0 0 0 $8,144,000 $25,462,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $814,000 $2,036,000 $3,361,000 $39,817,000 $32,726,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $15,771,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake Temescal Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 180 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,728,000 $0 $0 $173,000 $432,000 $173,000 $2,506,000 $1,150,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Mission Railroad Canyon Bundy Canyon Secondary 2.39 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols I-15 Lake Secondary 1.80 2 4 0% 3.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,075,000 $1,764,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $408,000 $1,019,000 $584,000 $7,850,000 $7,850,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols Temescal Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Collier/Riverside) I-15 Lakeshore Secondary 2.15 2 4 26% 3.19 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,608,000 $17,337,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $361,000 $902,000 $2,095,000 $24,303,000 $24,303,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Grand) Riverside SR-74 (Ortega) Secondary 0.64 2 4 0% 1.28 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,445,000 $6,943,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $361,000 $839,000 $9,733,000 $3,691,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Riverside) Lakeshore Grand Secondary 1.74 2 4 24% 2.65 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,995,000 $14,392,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $749,000 $1,739,000 $20,175,000 $20,175,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon I-15 Lake Secondary 1.21 2 4 0% 2.42 2 3 0 0 0 0 $4,211,000 $1,186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,000 $1,053,000 $540,000 $7,411,000 $7,411,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 250 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $240,000 $600,000 $240,000 $3,480,000 $3,480,000 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks Jefferson I-15 Secondary 0.32 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks I-15 Jackson Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks Jackson Clinton Keith Secondary 1.76 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jackson Whitewood Ynez Secondary 0.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Palomar Nutmeg Secondary 1.02 0 2 75% 0.51 2 3 0 0 0 0 $887,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,000 $222,000 $114,000 $1,562,000 $1,562,000 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Nutmeg Murrieta Hot Springs Secondary 2.37 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Murrieta Hot Springs Cherry Secondary 2.26 4 6 11% 4.02 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,548,000 $21,854,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $455,000 $1,137,000 $2,640,000 $30,634,000 $30,634,000 Southwest Murrieta Keller I-215 Whitewood Backbone 0.75 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Keller I-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Los Alamos Jefferson I-215 Secondary 1.77 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson I-215 Secondary 1.16 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs I-215 Margarita Secondary 1.45 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs Margarita SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 1.01 4 6 8% 1.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,106,000 $911,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $527,000 $302,000 $4,057,000 $3,899,000 Southwest Murrieta Nutmeg Jefferson Clinton Keith Secondary 1.97 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Clinton Keith Los Alamos Secondary 2.01 3 4 56% 0.88 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,539,000 $433,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $154,000 $385,000 $197,000 $2,708,000 $2,708,000 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Los Alamos Murrieta Hot Springs Secondary 1.93 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Murrieta Hot Springs Jackson Secondary 0.80 0 2 66% 0.54 2 2 0 0 0 0 $947,000 $2,959,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $237,000 $391,000 $4,629,000 $4,629,000 Southwest Murrieta Ynez Jackson SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 1.22 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Murrieta Hot Springs Calle Chapos Secondary 0.82 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $563,000 $56,000 $141,000 $56,000 $816,000 $816,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Calle Chapos La Serena Secondary 0.70 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $48,000 $120,000 $48,000 $696,000 $696,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage La Serena Rancho California Secondary 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $624,000 $62,000 $156,000 $62,000 $904,000 $904,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Rancho California Pauba Secondary 0.85 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $584,000 $58,000 $146,000 $58,000 $846,000 $846,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Pauba SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 1.69 2 4 93% 0.24 2 3 0 0 0 0 $412,000 $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 $103,000 $53,000 $725,000 $725,000 Southwest Temecula Jefferson Cherry Rancho California Secondary 2.29 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,575,000 $158,000 $394,000 $158,000 $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Margarita Murrieta Hot Springs SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 7.68 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,272,000 $527,000 $1,318,000 $527,000 $7,644,000 $7,644,000 Southwest Temecula Old Town Front Rancho California I-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 1.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto Secondary 1.32 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy Via Gilberto Pechanga Pkwy Secondary 1.44 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Jefferson Margarita Secondary 1.89 4 6 53% 1.78 1 1 0 0 0 0 $2,015,000 $13,938,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $202,000 $504,000 $1,595,000 $18,254,000 $18,181,000 Southwest Temecula Rancho California I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 1 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Margarita Butterfield Stage Secondary 1.96 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) I-15 Pechanga Pkwy Secondary 0.90 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Pechanga Pkwy Butterfield Stage Secondary 3.08 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,114,000 $211,000 $529,000 $211,000 $3,065,000 $3,065,000 Southwest Unincorporated Briggs Scott SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 3.39 2 4 56% 2.98 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,379,000 $1,463,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $338,000 $845,000 $484,000 $6,509,000 $6,509,000 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage Tucalota Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage (Pourroy) Auld Murrieta Hot Springs Secondary 2.27 0 4 17% 7.54 2 3 0 0 0 0 $13,113,000 $3,693,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,311,000 $3,278,000 $1,681,000 $23,076,000 $23,076,000 Southwest Unincorporated Grand Ortega Corydon Secondary 4.96 2 4 10% 8.92 1 2 0 0 0 0 $10,098,000 $48,529,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,010,000 $2,525,000 $5,863,000 $68,025,000 $68,025,000 Southwest Unincorporated Horsethief Canyon Temescal Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.17 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Indian Truck Trail Temescal Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.18 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Murrieta Hot Springs SR-79 (Winchester) Pourroy Secondary 1.75 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pala Pechanga San Diego County Secondary 1.39 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pourroy SR-79 (Winchester) Auld Secondary 2.28 2 4 84% 0.73 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,270,000 $358,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000 $318,000 $163,000 $2,236,000 $2,236,000 Southwest Unincorporated Rancho California Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks Secondary 4.26 2 4 0% 8.52 1 1 0 0 0 0 $9,645,000 $66,712,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $965,000 $2,411,000 $7,636,000 $87,369,000 $87,369,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Horsethief Canyon Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 240 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,304,000 $0 $0 $230,000 $576,000 $230,000 $3,340,000 $3,340,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Truck Trail I-15 Secondary 2.57 2 4 0% 5.14 2 3 0 0 0 0 $8,944,000 $2,519,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $894,000 $2,236,000 $1,146,000 $15,739,000 $15,739,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 105 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,008,000 $0 $0 $101,000 $252,000 $101,000 $1,462,000 $1,462,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Mission I-15 Secondary 0.94 2 4 32% 1.27 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,441,000 $6,923,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $360,000 $836,000 $9,704,000 $9,704,000 Southwest Wildomar Grand Corydon Wildomar Trail Secondary 2.02 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Mission Bundy Canyon Palomar Secondary 0.84 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Clinton Keith Washington Secondary 0.74 2 4 0% 1.48 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,675,000 $725,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,000 $419,000 $240,000 $3,227,000 $3,227,000 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Mission Clinton Keith Secondary 2.79 2 4 21% 4.41 2 3 0 0 0 0 $7,667,000 $2,159,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $767,000 $1,917,000 $983,000 $13,493,000 $13,493,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail I-15 Baxter Secondary 0.29 2 4 0% 0.59 1 3 0 0 0 0 $665,000 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $166,000 $95,000 $1,281,000 $1,281,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail I-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $27,858,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Baxter Palomar Secondary 0.74 2 4 0% 1.48 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,680,000 $8,073,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,000 $420,000 $975,000 $11,316,000 $11,316,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Palomar Grand Secondary 0.51 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Secondary 469.28 240.56 22 8,650 6 26.75 $303,507,000 $590,248,000 $621,740,000 $101,280,000 $237,200,000 $18,358,000 $128,215,000 $320,544,000 $187,237,000 $2,508,329,000 $1,913,028,000 Totals Network 739.22 558.58 33 17,485 9 33.89 741,859,000$ 1,272,869,000$ 1,057,070,000$ 176,256,000$ 374,000,000$ 23,259,000$ 237,252,000$ 593,150,000$ 364,535,000$ 4,840,250,000$ 3,874,735,000$ Transit 217,870,000$ 154,831,000$
Administration 161,183,000$ 161,183,000$
MSHCP 64,606,000$ 53,859,000$
TOTAL 5,283,909,000$ 4,244,608,000$
EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Central Menifee Ethanac Goetz Murrieta $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.27 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac Murrieta I-215 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.29 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.62 1.21 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac Sherman Matthews $2,674,000 $2,674,000 $69,000 0% 0% 0.32 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $69,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossing $105,560,000 $105,560,000 $3,640,000 0% 0% 0.32 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson $1,307,000 $1,307,000 $34,000 Between Rouse and Matthews 11% 11% 0.70 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Salt Creek bridge $4,384,000 $4,384,000 $151,000 0% 0% 0.36 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergate Newport $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Garbani $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.41 0.54 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Garbani Scott $4,353,000 $4,353,000 $113,000 0% 0% 0.64 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scott Murrieta City Limit $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Murrieta $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.59 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Murrieta I-215 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $29,000 Between Pacific Channel and Winter Hawk, and SB I-215 Exit Ramp and SB I-215 On Ramp 27% 27% 0.84 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport I-215 Menifee $0 $0 $0 Between Menifee Lakes to Menifee, and I-215 SB On Ramp to Antelope 36% 36% 0.93 1.08 85% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Menifee Lindenberger $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Lindenberger SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott I-215 Briggs $8,635,000 $8,635,000 $224,000 Between SB I-215 On Ramp and Antelope 5% 5% 0.45 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $224,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.17 1.54 57% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott Sunset Murrieta $4,388,000 $4,388,000 $114,000 0% 0% 0.94 1.32 91% $0 $0 $0 $114,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott Murrieta I-215 $16,949,000 $12,949,000 $336,000 0% 0% 0.72 1.03 $0 $4,000,000 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee SR-74 Matthews Briggs $8,254,000 $8,254,000 $214,000 0% 0% 0.72 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $214,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro I-215 Perris $13,420,000 $13,420,000 $100,000 0% 0% 0.61 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.22 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs $18,019,000 $18,019,000 $468,000 0% 0% 0.24 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 Alessandro $7,291,000 $7,291,000 $189,000 0% 0% 0.65 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.60 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Reche Vista Ironwood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.34 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.74 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $11,192,000 $0 0% 0% 2.03 2.62 34% $21,506,000 $0 $21,506,000 $0 $0 $0 $21,506,000 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Cactus Harley Knox $0 $0 $0 Between Nandina and Harley Knox 18% 18% 0.69 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Vista Country Heacock $7,486,000 $3,799,000 $39,000 Moreno Valley City Limit to Heacock 100% 100% 0.92 0.95 51% $3,687,000 $0 $3,687,000 $77,000 $38,000 $38,000 $3,725,000 Central Perris 11th/Case Perris Goetz $4,582,000 $4,582,000 $34,000 0% 0% 0.76 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Case Goetz I-215 $20,876,000 $20,876,000 $155,000 Between Ellis and Murrietta 40% 40% 0.80 1.18 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Case San Jacinto River bridge $1,740,000 $1,235,000 $43,000 0% 0% 1.18 1.88 71% $505,000 $0 $505,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $505,000 Central Perris Ethanac Keystone Goetz $6,056,000 $6,056,000 $157,000 0% 0% 0.07 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $157,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ethanac San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 0% 0% 0.07 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ethanac I-215 Sherman $5,316,000 $5,316,000 $39,000 0% 0% 0.53 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $39,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Goetz Case Ethanac $1,507,000 $999,000 $26,000 Between Case and Ethanac 100% 100% 1.06 1.38 66% $508,000 $0 $508,000 $39,000 $13,000 $13,000 $521,000 Central Perris Goetz San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $3,398,000 $117,000 0% 0% 1.13 1.50 61% $2,170,000 $0 $2,170,000 $192,000 $0 $0 $2,170,000 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) I-215 Perris $15,655,000 $15,655,000 $116,000 0% 0% 0.05 0.21 $0 $0 $0 $116,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.46 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) Perris Evans $22,985,000 $22,985,000 $171,000 0% 0% 0.03 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $171,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Mid-County (Placentia) Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.03 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Harley Knox Ramona $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.86 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Ramona Citrus $7,063,000 $7,063,000 $183,000 Between Ramona and Dawes, and Rider and Water 39% 39% 0.83 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $183,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Citrus Nuevo $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Nuevo 11th $6,927,000 $6,927,000 $51,000 0% 0% 0.72 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris I-215 overcrossing bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.78 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona I-215 Perris $5,039,000 $5,039,000 $37,000 Between NB I-215 On Ramp and Webster 26% 26% 0.77 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $7,725,000 $0 0% 0% 1.80 2.08 24% $24,973,000 $0 $24,973,000 $0 $0 $0 $24,973,000 Central Perris Ramona Perris Evans $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona Evans Mid-County (2,800 ft E of Rider) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (4th) Ellis I-215 $0 $0 $0 Between Navajo and S A St 22% 22% 0.78 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Ethanac SR-74 Keystone $4,666,000 $4,666,000 $121,000 0% 0% 0.04 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $121,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Gilman Springs Alessandro Bridge Road $30,601,000 $30,601,000 $869,000 Between Olive and Jackrabbit 41% 41% 0.87 1.43 $0 $0 $0 $869,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Menifee Nuevo SR-74 (Pinacate) $16,684,000 $16,684,000 $433,000 0% 0% 0.69 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $433,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid-County Evans Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) $12,156,000 $12,156,000 $362,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $362,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Pico Avenue $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.37 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge Road $47,769,000 $47,769,000 $1,240,000 0% 0% 0.82 1.43 $0 $0 $0 $1,240,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge $36,192,000 $36,192,000 $1,248,000 0% 0% 0.78 1.33 $0 $0 $0 $1,248,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon San Bernardino County Reche Vista $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.84 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Vista Reche Canyon Country $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.81 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Scott Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.12 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated SR-74 Ethanac Ellis $0 $0 $0 Between Ethanac and Theda, and Mountain and Sofie 34% 34% 0.87 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco I-15 Temescal Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.59 2.08 42% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Paseo Grande Lincoln $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.30 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill California I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.29 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River SR-91 Dominguez Ranch $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Dominguez Ranch Palisades $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Paseo Grande $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman San Bernardino County 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek $648,000 $648,000 $0 0% 0% 0.65 1.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Cucamonga Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 1.27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison $866,000 $866,000 $0 0% 0% 0.69 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Harrison Sumner $488,000 $488,000 $0 Between Spicewood and Sumner 18% 18% 0.62 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Sumner Scholar $7,625,000 $7,625,000 $57,000 0% 0% 0.85 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Scholar A Street $119,000 $119,000 $1,000 0% 0% 0.50 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman A Street Hamner $209,000 $209,000 $2,000 0% 0% 0.50 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR-60 Bellegrave $23,928,000 $10,461,000 $78,000 Between SR-60 and Bellegrave 100% 100% 1.02 1.10 44% $13,467,000 $0 $13,467,000 $178,000 $100,000 $100,000 $13,567,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Bellegrave Santa Ana River $60,900,000 $0 $0 Between Limonite and Santa Ana River, and Rutile and Bellegrave 59% 59% 1.03 1.13 44% $19,851,000 $60,900,000 $0 $452,000 $147,000 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Alessandro Arlington Trautwein $2,410,000 $2,410,000 $0 Between Arlington and Via Vista, and Canyon Crest and Trautwein 73% 73% 1.03 1.16 48% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arlington La Sierra Magnolia $0 $0 $0 Between Ben Lomond and 300 ft East of Pegasus 13% 13% 0.68 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arlington Magnolia Alessandro $46,465,000 $46,465,000 $475,000 Between Victoria and Alessandro 36% 36% 0.80 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Santa Ana River SR-91 $5,230,000 $4,392,000 $33,000 Between Santa Ana River and Cypress 58% 58% 0.94 1.05 72% $838,000 $0 $838,000 $39,000 $6,000 $6,000 $844,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren SR-91 Mockingbird Canyon $39,493,000 $21,292,000 $158,000 Between Mockingbird Canyon and Rudicill, and Indiana to SR-91 95% 95% 1.00 1.10 51% $18,201,000 $0 $18,201,000 $293,000 $135,000 $135,000 $18,336,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Wood Trautwein $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.79 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Trautwein Orange Terrace $7,574,000 $7,574,000 $56,000 0% 0% 0.69 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Trautwein Vista Grande $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.79 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Vista Grande I-215 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.85 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco El Sobrante Harley John $10,580,000 $9,817,000 $279,000 Between El Sobrante and Gavilan 40% 20% 0.95 1.04 64% $763,000 $0 $763,000 $301,000 $22,000 $22,000 $785,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harley John Harvil $166,492,000 $166,492,000 $1,236,000 Between Harley John and Wood, and Cole and Alexander, and Carroll and Seaton 63% 31% 0.87 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $1,236,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harvil I-215 $1,238,000 $1,238,000 $32,000 0% 0% 0.78 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Canyon La Sierra $49,596,000 $35,953,000 $1,071,000 Between Temesacal Canyon and Sierra 100% 50% 1.06 1.19 45% $13,643,000 $0 $13,643,000 $1,477,000 $406,000 $406,000 $14,049,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Wash bridge $4,872,000 $1,907,000 $66,000 0% 0% 1.13 1.27 39% $2,965,000 $0 $2,965,000 $168,000 $0 $0 $2,965,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco La Sierra El Sobrante $96,453,000 $96,453,000 $2,872,000 0% 0% 0.78 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $2,872,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Mockingbird Canyon Wood $67,429,000 $67,429,000 $501,000 Between Washington and Wood 47% 47% 0.89 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $501,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Orange Terrace I-215 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.71 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Pass Banning Highland Springs Wilson (8th) Sun Lakes $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.46 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $32,516,000 $0 0% 0% 1.16 1.43 52% $30,545,000 $14,698,000 $15,847,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,847,000 Pass Banning Highland Springs Oak Valley (14th) Wilson (8th) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.29 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley (14th) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.28 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) $50,110,000 $50,110,000 $372,000 0% 0% 0.04 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $372,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 0% 0% 0.73 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South San Gorgonio bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.26 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South UP/Hargrave railroad crossing $52,780,000 $52,780,000 $1,820,000 0% 0% 0.26 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Oak Valley (San Timoteo Canyon)SR-60 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 interchange $63,061,000 $29,561,000 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.84 $0 $33,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero UP railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 $1,380,000 0% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $1,380,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Noble Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 4th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.01 0.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 California $0 $0 $0 Between I-10 WB On Ramp and California 100% 100% 1.05 1.18 46% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $7,408,000 $0 0% 0% 2.20 2.37 12% $55,653,000 $0 $55,653,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,653,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $59,773,000 $0 0% 0% 0.93 1.51 95% $3,288,000 $443,000 $2,845,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,845,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley Roberts St Roberts Rd $3,053,000 $3,053,000 $79,000 0% 0% 0.54 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Bellflower Noble $6,411,000 $6,411,000 $166,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $166,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Highland Springs Bellflower $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.03 0.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Noble Roberts St $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.41 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley San Timoteo Wash bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.26 0.41 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated SR-79 (Lamb Canyon) California Gilman Springs $0 $0 $0 Between California and Gilman Springs 100% 100% 1.21 1.43 42% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Warren Sanderson $7,726,000 $7,726,000 $201,000 0% 0% 0.82 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Sanderson State $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.41 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 Winchester Warren $35,208,000 $35,208,000 $261,000 Between Warren and 650 ft East of Cordoba 25% 25% 0.83 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid-County (Ramona) Warren Sanderson $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.57 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid-County (Ramona) Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemet Bypass)interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.61 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Sanderson State $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.48 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona State Main $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Main Cedar $31,518,000 $26,928,000 $200,000 Between 7th and Rue Pinot Blanc, and Hemet and Mountain 68% 34% 0.93 0.97 57% $4,590,000 $0 $4,590,000 $234,000 $34,000 $34,000 $4,624,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Cedar SR-74 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.29 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni SR-79 (Winchester) Warren $13,508,000 $13,508,000 $351,000 0% 0% 0.88 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $351,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.88 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Bridge Sanderson $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Mid-County (Ramona) Bridge Warren $9,221,000 $9,221,000 $239,000 0% 0% 0.78 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $239,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-74 Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) $15,417,000 $15,417,000 $400,000 Between Briggs and Sultanas 14% 14% 0.63 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) SR-74 (Florida) Domenigoni $13,901,000 $13,901,000 $361,000 0% 0% 0.62 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $361,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.62 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) Domenigoni Winchester $6,542,000 $6,542,000 $170,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (San Jacinto Bypass) Mid-County (Ramona) SR-74 (Florida) $56,690,000 $56,690,000 $1,472,000 0% 0% 0.55 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $1,472,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) Gilman Springs Ramona $6,899,000 $2,555,000 $66,000 Between Ramona and Gilman Springs 100% 100% 1.18 1.34 37% $4,344,000 $0 $4,344,000 $179,000 $113,000 $113,000 $4,457,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) San Jacinto River bridge $19,488,000 $7,651,000 $264,000 0% 0% 1.21 1.41 39% $11,837,000 $0 $11,837,000 $672,000 $0 $0 $11,837,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Domenigoni Keller $65,022,000 $65,022,000 $483,000 0% 0% 0.55 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $483,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Goetz Railroad Canyon Newport $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.35 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills Goetz $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.71 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 Canyon Hills $0 $0 $0 Between NB I-5 On Ramp and Summerhill 2% 2% 0.86 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 2.48 3.04 26% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 I-15 interchange $63,061,000 $24,162,000 $0 0% 0% 1.60 2.03 38% $38,899,000 $0 $38,899,000 $0 $0 $0 $38,899,000 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith Copper Craft Toulon $0 $0 $0 Between California Oaks and Toulon 35% 35% 0.76 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith Toulon I-215 $2,076,000 $2,076,000 $54,000 Between Toulon and Thousand Oaks, and Duster and McElwain 52% 52% 0.88 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith I-215 Whitewood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta French Valley (Date) Murrieta Hot Springs Winchester Creek $7,321,000 $7,321,000 $54,000 0% 0% 0.77 1.21 $0 $0 $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta French Valley (Date) Winchester Creek Margarita $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.04 0.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Menifee City Limit Keller $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Keller Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.54 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Jefferson Diaz $3,929,000 $3,929,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Murrieta Creek bridge $5,846,000 $5,846,000 $202,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $202,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Margarita Ynez $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.20 0.34 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Ynez Jefferson $5,010,000 $5,010,000 $37,000 0% 0% 0.07 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) I-15 interchange $122,076,000 $122,076,000 $0 0% 0% 0.19 0.29 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson $2,697,000 $2,697,000 $0 Between Promenade Mall West and Murrieta Hot Springs, and I-15 NB On Ramp to 250 ft East of Jefferson Ave 84% 84% 0.96 1.24 81% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.58 1.80 24% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Diaz) Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 $17,000 0% 0% 0.18 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)Rancho California SR-79 (Front) $23,629,000 $23,629,000 $296,000 0% 0% 0.01 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $296,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 2.30 3.07 36% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga)Murrieta Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.01 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Benton SR-79 Eastern Bypass $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.26 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Whitewood SR-79 $5,539,000 $5,539,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Warm Springs Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-74 I-15 Ethanac $27,699,000 $26,347,000 $749,000 Between I-15 nd Dexter, and Conard and Riverside, and Steele Valley and Peach, and Meadowbrook and Ethanac 64% 64% 0.93 1.23 92% $1,352,000 $0 $1,352,000 $787,000 $38,000 $38,000 $1,390,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Keller Thompson $34,213,000 $34,213,000 $254,000 0% 0% 0.56 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $254,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Thompson La Alba $27,699,000 $27,699,000 $206,000 Between La Alba and Via Mira Mosa 25% 25% 0.82 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) La Alba Hunter $7,854,000 $3,042,000 $22,000 Between La Alba and Hunter 100% 100% 1.10 1.22 39% $4,812,000 $0 $4,812,000 $58,000 $36,000 $36,000 $4,848,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Hunter Murrieta Hot Springs $595,000 $442,000 $11,000 Between Murrieta Hot Springs and Robert Jones, and Borel 75% 75% 0.95 1.04 66% $153,000 $0 $153,000 $15,000 $4,000 $4,000 $157,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 Monte Vista $1,362,000 $1,362,000 $39,000 Between I-15 NB On Ramp and Monte Vista 75% 75% 0.84 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $39,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Monte Vista Sunset $24,818,000 $24,818,000 $739,000 Between Monte Vista and Oak Circle 37% 37% 0.89 1.18 $0 $0 $0 $739,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $24,613,000 $0 0% 0% 1.12 1.77 75% $8,085,000 $0 $8,085,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,085,000 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith Palomar I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith I-15 Copper Craft $5,030,000 $0 $0 Between Inland Valley and Smith Ranch, and Covington and Copper Craft 60% 60% 0.89 1.01 $0 $5,030,000 $0 $143,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $2,331,921,000 $1,961,707,000 $30,262,000 10.8% $286,635,000 $118,571,000 $251,643,000 $32,508,000 $1,092,000 945,000 252,588,000 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Central Menifee Briggs Newport Scott $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.18 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson $2,991,000 $2,991,000 $78,000 0% 0% 0.05 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs Simpson Old Newport $5,430,000 $5,430,000 $141,000 0% 0% 0.35 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs Salt Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.41 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Garbani I-215 interchange $63,061,000 $42,483,000 $0 0% 0% 1.21 1.85 67% $20,578,000 $0 $20,578,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,578,000 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane $11,378,000 $11,378,000 $295,000 0% 0% 0.70 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanita $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Murrieta Bradley $15,708,000 $15,708,000 $117,000 0% 0% 0.52 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Bradley Haun $11,439,000 $11,439,000 $85,000 0% 0% 0.62 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Haun Antelope $9,456,000 $9,456,000 $70,000 0% 0% 0.74 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland I-215 overcrossing bridge $9,744,000 $9,744,000 $336,000 0% 0% 0.76 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Antelope Menifee $3,844,000 $3,844,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.17 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall I-215 Aspel $5,354,000 $5,354,000 $139,000 0% 0% 0.34 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.58 2.02 39% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee $2,288,000 $2,288,000 $59,000 0% 0% 0.38 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Murrieta Ethanac McCall $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Murrieta McCall Newport $7,967,000 $7,967,000 $207,000 0% 0% 0.60 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Murrieta Newport Bundy Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 Heacock $5,617,000 $5,617,000 $42,000 Between Goldencrest and Arial, and Frontage Road and 250 ft East 7% 7% 0.66 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.22 1.43 40% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.03 1.21 60% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 Eucalyptus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus I-215 Towngate $8,843,000 $8,843,000 $66,000 0% 0% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Towngate Frederick $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitching $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitching Moreno Beach $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.19 0.28 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.01 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Frederick SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 $0 Between SR-60 and Sunnymead 5% 5% 0.42 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.56 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.11 0.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood SR-60 Day $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.82 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.68 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle John F Kennedy Oleander $0 $0 $0 Between Via Xavier and Krameria 13% 13% 0.72 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon SR-60 $18,797,000 $18,797,000 $140,000 Between SR-60 and SR-60 WB Exit Ramp 5% 5% 0.32 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR-60 overcrossing bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.95 1.27 87% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Nason SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 $0 Between SR-60 and SR-60 WB On Ramp, and Hemlock and Ironwood 87% 87% 0.94 1.07 74% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Ironwood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.40 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.02 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro $39,789,000 $39,789,000 $295,000 Between Locust and Ironwood 27% 27% 0.80 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 Eucalyptus $3,966,000 $3,966,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.46 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ellis Goetz Evans $9,526,000 $9,526,000 $247,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.14 $0 $0 $0 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.71 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Ramona Morgan $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.80 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Morgan Rider $0 $0 $0 Between Morgan and Sinclair 50% 50% 0.83 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Rider Placentia $0 $0 $0 Between Placentia and 350 ft North 11% 11% 0.55 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Placentia Nuevo $6,492,000 $6,492,000 $169,000 Between Placentia and 220 ft South, and Moraga and Sunset 9% 4% 0.54 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Nuevo Ellis $17,705,000 $17,705,000 $460,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge $11,136,000 $11,136,000 $384,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans I-215 bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Goetz Lesser Ethanac $7,845,000 $7,845,000 $204,000 Between Ethanac and Ruffian 7% 7% 0.79 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $204,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox I-215 Indian $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.99 1.62 88% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Indian Perris $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.12 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Perris Redlands $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.25 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo I-215 Murrieta $16,971,000 $16,971,000 $126,000 0% 0% 0.51 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $126,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $19,736,000 $0 0% 0% 1.53 2.50 60% $12,962,000 $0 $12,962,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,962,000 Central Perris Nuevo Murrieta Dunlap $4,367,000 $4,367,000 $113,000 0% 0% 0.35 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.35 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) I-215 Ethanac $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $21,835,000 $0 0% 0% 1.41 2.42 67% $10,863,000 $0 $10,863,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,863,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) I-215 Mt Vernon $0 $0 $0 Between I-215 and Highgrove 4% 4% 0.39 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $11,912,000 $0 0% 0% 2.38 3.22 36% $20,786,000 $0 $20,786,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,786,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 $690,000 0% 0% 0.46 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Ellis Post SR-74 $11,550,000 $11,550,000 $300,000 0% 0% 0.20 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mount Vernon/CETAP CorridorCenter Pigeon Pass $2,582,000 $2,582,000 $77,000 0% 0% 0.58 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Nuevo Dunlap Menifee $8,737,000 $2,505,000 $65,000 Between Dunlap and Menifee 100% 100% 0.76 1.30 $0 $6,232,000 $0 $227,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 0% 0% 0.77 1.36 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Mount Vernon $8,106,000 $8,106,000 $241,000 0% 0% 1.16 1.33 40% $0 $0 $0 $241,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.02 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Redlands San Timoteo Canyon Locust $0 $0 $0 Between Locust and San Timoteo 100% 100% 1.32 1.51 31% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona 6th SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Auto Center Railroad SR-91 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco Bedford Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Hidden Valley Norco Hills McKinley $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Lincoln Parkridge Ontario $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia 6th Sherborn $7,054,000 $6,419,000 $47,000 Between 6th and Sherborn 100% 100% 0.91 1.07 91% $635,000 $0 $635,000 $52,000 $5,000 $5,000 $640,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Temescal Creek bridge $4,176,000 $3,580,000 $123,000 0% 0% 0.93 1.08 86% $596,000 $0 $596,000 $144,000 $0 $0 $596,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Sherborn Rimpau $0 $0 $0 Between Rimpau and I-15 SB On Ramp, and Montecito and Sherborn 60% 60% 0.93 1.04 77% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia Rimpau Ontario $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.71 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Grand Ontario $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.78 0.81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Ontario Foothill $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.40 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Hidden Valley Parkridge $5,314,000 $4,389,000 $32,000 Between Hidden Valley and Parkridge 100% 100% 0.94 1.12 83% $925,000 $0 $925,000 $39,000 $7,000 $7,000 $932,000 Northwest Corona Main Parkridge SR-91 $0 $0 $0 Between SR-91 WB On Ramp and Grand 8% 8% 0.62 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main SR-91 S. Grand $0 $0 $0 Between 3rd and 4th 8% 8% 0.66 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Hidden Valley Promenade $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.70 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Promenade SR-91 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.61 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.76 0.81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Arlington Channel bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.81 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.81 0.89 $0 $105,560,000 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario I-15 El Cerrito $13,451,000 $13,451,000 $100,000 Between State and Rising Sun 32% 32% 0.69 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Lincoln Buena Vista $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Buena Vista Main $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Main Kellogg $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.41 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Kellogg Fullerton $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.36 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Fullerton Rimpau $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.36 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Rimpau I-15 $0 $0 $0 Between Compton and I-15 SB On Ramp 7% 7% 0.45 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Auto Club Buena Vista $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.26 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad BNSF railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 $1,380,000 0% 0% 0.31 0.34 $0 $0 $0 $1,380,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Buena Vista Main (at Grand) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona River Corydon Main $0 $0 $0 Between Corydon and 2nd St 25% 25% 0.71 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Serfas Club SR-91 Green River $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Northwest Eastvale Archibald Remington River $3,382,000 $3,382,000 $0 Between Whispering Hills and Cadenza, and Providence and San Bernardino County 24% 24% 0.62 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Mission Bellegrave $0 $0 $0 Between Ontario Ranch and Micro, and Riverside and Mission 44% 44% 0.86 1.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Bellegrave Amberhill $199,000 $199,000 $0 0% 0% 0.57 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Amberhill Limonite $2,787,000 $2,787,000 $72,000 0% 0% 0.68 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Limonite Schleisman $991,000 $991,000 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Schleisman Santa Ana River $5,533,000 $3,675,000 $96,000 Between Schleisman and Santa Ana River 100% 50% 1.24 1.41 33% $1,858,000 $0 $1,858,000 $144,000 $48,000 $48,000 $1,906,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walters $419,000 $419,000 $3,000 0% 0% 0.86 1.69 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Walters River $21,503,000 $21,503,000 $160,000 0% 0% 0.69 1.44 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge $3,828,000 $3,828,000 $132,000 0% 0% 0.69 1.44 $0 $0 $0 $132,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 Eastvale Gateway $289,000 $289,000 $0 Between I-15 and Eastvale Gateway 100% 100% 0.93 1.32 92% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Eastvale Gateway Hamner $255,000 $255,000 $0 Between Eastvale Gateway and Hamner 100% 100% 0.95 1.36 90% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Hamner Sumner $1,094,000 $1,094,000 $28,000 Between Hamner and Scholar 50% 50% 0.80 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Sumner Harrison $497,000 $497,000 $0 0% 0% 0.77 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Harrison Archibald $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) $2,208,000 $2,208,000 $57,000 0% 0% 0.00 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge $13,920,000 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.64 0.75 $0 $13,920,000 $0 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale River Hellman Archibald $5,948,000 $5,948,000 $44,000 0% 0% 0.67 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Armstrong San Bernardino County Valley $6,192,000 $6,192,000 $176,000 Between Sierra and Valley 33% 33% 0.83 1.14 $0 $0 $0 $176,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Bellegrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Van Buren $464,000 $464,000 $12,000 0% 0% 0.43 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville Bellegrave $793,000 $793,000 $21,000 0% 0% 0.14 0.27 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda Philadelphia SR-60 $1,515,000 $989,000 $25,000 Between San Bernardino County and SR-60 100% 100% 1.11 1.49 65% $526,000 $0 $526,000 $39,000 $14,000 $14,000 $540,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda SR-60 Limonite $0 $0 $0 Between SR-60 and Riverside, and Cantu Galleano Ranch and Coral 12% 12% 0.61 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite I-15 Wineville $0 $0 $0 Between I-15 and I-15 NB On Ramp 15% 15% 0.82 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Wineville Etiwanda $0 $0 $0 Between Etiwanda and Lorena 9% 9% 0.76 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Etiwanda Van Buren $2,981,000 $2,981,000 $77,000 Between Bain and Beach 23% 23% 0.80 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Van Buren Clay $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Clay Riverview $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.64 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Rubidoux Santa Ana River $5,181,000 $0 $0 Between Rubidoux and Aqua Mansa, and Via Cerro and Santa Ana River 40% 40% 0.86 1.06 $0 $5,181,000 $0 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Santa Ana River bridge $13,920,000 $6,204,000 $214,000 0% 0% 1.13 1.32 45% $7,716,000 $0 $7,716,000 $480,000 $0 $0 $7,716,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission Milliken SR-60 $0 $0 $0 Between Milliken and Wineville, and SR-60 to SR-60 EB Off Ramp 58% 58% 0.90 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission SR-60 Santa Ana River $0 $0 $0 Between Jurupa and Canal, Riverview and Rubidoux, and Crestmore and Santa Ana River 13% 13% 0.57 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Riverview Limonite Mission $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux Pine Mission $0 $0 $0 Between SR-60 WB and 30th, and 24th and Market 9% 9% 0.86 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $9,051,000 $0 0% 0% 1.61 1.88 28% $23,647,000 $0 $23,647,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,647,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Valley Armstrong Mission $0 $0 $0 Between Armstrong and Mission 100% 100% 1.22 1.47 44% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Parkridge Mountain $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.75 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Mountain Hamner $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 2nd River I-15 $0 $0 $0 Between Hamner and I-15 SB On Ramp 7% 7% 0.74 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th Hamner California $0 $0 $0 Between Hamner and I-15 NB On Ramp 9% 9% 0.68 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $3,489,000 $0 0% 0% 2.57 2.77 11% $29,209,000 $0 $29,209,000 $0 $0 $0 $29,209,000 Northwest Norco Arlington Crestview Fairhaven $4,342,000 $4,342,000 $113,000 Between Crestview and Fairhaven 100% 100% 0.79 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco California Arlington 6th $15,237,000 $12,525,000 $93,000 Between Arlington and 7th, and Green Tree ans 6th 78% 78% 0.96 1.14 77% $2,712,000 $0 $2,712,000 $113,000 $20,000 $20,000 $2,732,000 Northwest Norco Corydon River 5th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River bridge $33,408,000 $11,455,000 $395,000 0% 0% 1.41 1.67 34% $21,953,000 $21,621,000 $332,000 $1,152,000 $0 $0 $332,000 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River Hidden Valley $49,591,000 $49,591,000 $368,000 Between Detroit and Santa Ana River 6% 6% 0.65 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $368,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley I-15 Norco Hills $0 $0 $0 Between I-15 to I-15 NB On Ramp 3% 3% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley Hamner I-15 $0 $0 $0 Between Hamner and I-15 100% 100% 1.14 1.23 27% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Norco Corydon Hamner $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.33 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco North California Crestview $0 $0 $0 Between California and Crestview 100% 100% 0.96 1.19 80% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco River Archibald Corydon $1,743,000 $1,109,000 $8,000 Between Archibald and Sundance 79% 79% 1.20 1.56 54% $634,000 $0 $634,000 $13,000 $5,000 $5,000 $639,000 Northwest Riverside 14th Market Martin Luther King $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 1st Market Main $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.24 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd SR-91 I-215 $1,941,000 $1,941,000 $14,000 0% 0% 0.49 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $30,560,000 $1,054,000 0% 0% 0.77 0.90 $0 $75,000,000 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams Arlington SR-91 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.49 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 Lincoln $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 interchange $32,698,000 $3,262,000 $0 0% 0% 1.46 1.52 10% $29,436,000 $935,000 $28,501,000 $0 $0 $0 $28,501,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington Fairhaven La Sierra $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.68 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Buena Vista Santa Ana River Redwood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.83 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Martin Luther King Central $0 $0 $0 Between Martin Luther King and El Cerrito 71% 71% 1.02 1.16 55% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Central Country Club $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.70 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Country Club Via Vista $4,996,000 $1,593,000 $45,000 Between Country Club and Via Vista 100% 100% 1.30 1.48 32% $3,403,000 $0 $3,403,000 $142,000 $97,000 $97,000 $3,500,000 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Via Vista Alessandro $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.59 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Chicago I-215/SR-60 $0 $0 $0 Between Chicago and Chapala, and Canyon Crest and Quail Run 32% 32% 0.80 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 Between SR-91 and SR-91 SB On Ramp 6% 6% 0.64 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Alessandro SR-91 $0 $0 $0 Between SR-91 and SR-91 NB On Ramp, and Nottingham and 420 ft West 5% 5% 0.75 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Van Buren Magnolia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Alessandro Spruce $0 $0 $0 Between Martin Luther King and Ransom 43% 43% 0.85 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Spruce Columbia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia Main Iowa $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $9,050,000 $0 0% 0% 2.96 3.74 28% $23,648,000 $0 $23,648,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,648,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa Center 3rd $30,272,000 $30,272,000 $225,000 Between Palmyrita and Columbia 11% 11% 0.82 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa 3rd University $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa University Martin Luther King $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.24 0.36 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside JFK Trautwein Wood $1,880,000 $1,880,000 $49,000 0% 0% 0.54 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Arlington SR-91 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra SR-91 Indiana $192,000 $192,000 $0 0% 0% 0.77 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Indiana Victoria $778,000 $778,000 $0 0% 0% 0.71 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lemon (NB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.11 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Van Buren Jefferson $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.23 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Jefferson Washington $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.26 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Washington Victoria $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison SR-91 Victoria $853,000 $853,000 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 $690,000 0% 0% 0.81 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF Railroad Tyler $0 $0 $0 Between Buchanan and SR-91 EB On Ramp, and SR-91 to La Sierra 53% 53% 0.82 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF railroad crossing $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.90 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Tyler Harrison $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Harrison 14th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Main 1st San Bernardino County $0 $0 $0 Between Columbia and San Bernardino County, and SR-60 WB On Ramp to SR-60 EB On Ramp 43% 43% 0.76 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Market 14th Santa Ana River $9,491,000 $9,491,000 $70,000 Between Rivera and Santa Ana River 21% 21% 0.72 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Martin Luther King 14th I-215/SR-60 $24,031,000 $24,031,000 $178,000 Between Victoria and Sedgwick, and Iowa and I-215 SB On Ramp 41% 41% 0.78 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $178,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Mission Inn Redwood Lemon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.26 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Redwood (SB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.59 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Trautwein Alessandro Van Buren $0 $0 $0 Between Mission Grove and Orange Terrace 43% 43% 0.88 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 interchange $63,061,000 $21,814,000 $0 0% 0% 1.56 1.90 35% $41,247,000 $0 $41,247,000 $0 $0 $0 $41,247,000 Northwest Riverside Tyler Magnolia Hole $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.30 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Hole Wells $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Wells Arlington $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.59 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University Redwood SR-91 $859,000 $859,000 $0 0% 0% 0.60 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University SR-91 I-215/SR-60 $2,067,000 $2,067,000 $0 Between SR-60 and SR-60 SB On Ramp 2% 2% 0.52 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Lincoln Arlington $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.86 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Madison Washington $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.36 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Washington Victoria Hermosa $27,018,000 $27,018,000 $201,000 Between Dufferin and Overlook, and Bradley and Hermosa 34% 34% 0.83 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood JFK Van Buren $3,053,000 $3,053,000 $79,000 0% 0% 0.81 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Van Buren Bergamont $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.50 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Bergamont Krameria $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Northwest Unincorporated Cantu-Galleano Ranch Hamner Wineville $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Dos Lagos (Weirick) Temescal Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 Between I-15 and I-15 NB On Ramp 22% 22% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Cerrito I-15 Ontario $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.15 0.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Sobrante Mockingbird Canyon Cajalco $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Washington Scottsdale $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Scottsdale Cajalco $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra Victoria El Sobrante $0 $0 $0 Between Victoria and Orchard View 40% 40% 0.85 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra El Sobrante Cajalco $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.50 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Mockingbird Canyon Van Buren El Sobrante $20,871,000 $20,871,000 $593,000 Between Van Buren and Lindina 31% 31% 0.76 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $593,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon El Cerrito Tuscany $3,168,000 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.68 1.07 $0 $3,168,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Tuscany Dos Lagos $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dos Lagos Leroy $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.48 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Leroy Dawson Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.46 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dawson Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 Between I-15 NB On Ramp and 1000 ft North 43% 43% 0.66 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.85 1.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon I-15 Park Canyon $14,329,000 $14,329,000 $427,000 Between I-15 SB On Ramp and Squaw Mountain 27% 27% 0.69 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $427,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.02 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Washington Hermosa Harley John $12,787,000 $12,787,000 $332,000 0% 0% 0.73 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $332,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Wood Krameria Cajalco $12,537,000 $12,537,000 $325,000 Between Krameria and Mariposa 17% 17% 0.56 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning 8th Wilson I-10 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.25 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Lincoln Sunset SR-243 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.14 0.16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey I-10 8th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.10 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 8th Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.24 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning SR-243 I-10 Wesley $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Home Sunset $30,502,000 $30,502,000 $226,000 0% 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Montgomery Creek bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 0% 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.04 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset Ramsey Lincoln $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.13 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset I-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Home 8th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.06 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.14 0.24 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Viele Pennsylvania $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.48 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Pennsylvania Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 6th I-10 Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.23 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Desert Lawn Champions Oak Valley (STC) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Highland Springs Pennsylvania $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.05 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Pennsylvania Oak View $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.14 0.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Oak View I-10 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $62,401,000 $0 0% 0% 0.90 1.14 99% $660,000 $0 $660,000 $0 $0 $0 $660,000 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) UP Railroad Tukwet Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.01 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) Tukwet Canyon I-10 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.09 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 6th 1st $6,588,000 $6,588,000 $49,000 0% 0% 0.52 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania I-10 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Bryant County Line Avenue L $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa County Line I-10 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.13 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 0% 0% 0.54 1.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line 7th Bryant $0 $0 $0 Between I-10 WB On Ramp and Calimesa, and Park and 5th 13% 13% 0.54 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line I-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.88 1.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Desert Lawn Palmer Champions $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.04 0.44 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Avenue L Condit $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Condit Roberts $12,972,000 $12,972,000 $96,000 0% 0% 0.74 1.14 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.04 0.99 0% $63,061,000 $0 $63,061,000 $0 $0 $0 $63,061,000 Pass Calimesa Tukwet Canyon Roberts Rd Palmer $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.71 1.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.36 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon San Bernardino County UP Railroad $0 $0 $0 Between San Bernardino County and Redlands 22% 22% 0.31 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon UP Railroad railroad crossing $52,780,000 $52,780,000 $1,820,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Acacia Menlo $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.74 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Domenigoni Stetson $0 $0 $0 Between Stetson and Thornton 26% 26% 0.79 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson RR Crossing Acacia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.82 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Stetson RR Crossing $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.77 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Menlo Esplanade $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Warren Cawston $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Columbia Ramona $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74/SR-79 (Florida) Cawston Columbia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.38 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Domenigoni Chambers $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Chambers Stetson $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Florida Esplanade $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.33 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Stetson Florida $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.57 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Cawston State $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.49 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Warren Cawston $4,357,000 $4,357,000 $113,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Esplanade Domenigoni $19,926,000 $19,926,000 $517,000 Between Devonshire and Stetson 31% 31% 0.79 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $517,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Salt Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.64 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade Mountain State $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.33 0.39 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade State Warren $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.37 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Sanderson Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (North Ramona) State San Jacinto $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) North Ramona Blvd 7th $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.70 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) 7th SR-74 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.32 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.60 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Gilman Springs Quandt Ranch $3,317,000 $3,317,000 $86,000 0% 0% 0.82 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State San Jacinto River bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.86 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Quandt Ranch Ramona $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Warren Ramona Esplanade $13,469,000 $13,469,000 $350,000 0% 0% 0.67 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Sanderson State $11,097,000 $11,097,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.83 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Massacre Canyon Wash bridge $1,392,000 $1,392,000 $48,000 0% 0% 0.85 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) SR-74 (Florida) Domenigoni $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION % EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Southwest Lake Elsinore Corydon Mission Grand $3,336,000 $3,336,000 $87,000 0% 0% 0.73 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $87,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Diamond Mission I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.73 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Franklin (integral to Railroad Canyon Interchange) I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.66 1.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Lincoln Toft $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Toft SR-74 (Riverside) $3,512,000 $3,512,000 $91,000 0% 0% 0.68 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $91,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake I-15 Lincoln $39,817,000 $32,726,000 $335,000 Between Orange Grove and the I-15 SB On Ramp 76% 76% 0.99 1.28 77% $7,091,000 $0 $7,091,000 $407,000 $73,000 $73,000 $7,164,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $15,771,000 $0 0% 0% 1.08 1.25 48% $16,927,000 $0 $16,927,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,927,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake Temescal Wash bridge $2,506,000 $1,150,000 $39,000 0% 0% 1.12 1.31 46% $1,356,000 $0 $1,356,000 $86,000 $0 $0 $1,356,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Mission Railroad Canyon Bundy Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.48 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols I-15 Lake $7,850,000 $7,850,000 $204,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $204,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols Temescal Wash bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.63 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols I-15 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 0% 0% 0.63 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Collier/Riverside) I-15 Lakeshore $24,303,000 $24,303,000 $180,000 Between Strickland and Collier 31% 31% 0.86 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Grand) Riverside SR-74 (Ortega) $9,733,000 $3,691,000 $27,000 Between Riverside and Ortega 100% 100% 1.19 1.37 38% $6,042,000 $0 $6,042,000 $72,000 $45,000 $45,000 $6,087,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Riverside) Lakeshore Grand $20,175,000 $20,175,000 $150,000 Between Lakeshore and Raven 31% 31% 0.78 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon I-15 Lake $7,411,000 $7,411,000 $211,000 0% 0% 0.64 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash bridge $3,480,000 $3,480,000 $120,000 0% 0% 0.85 1.28 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks Jefferson I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks I-15 Jackson $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.76 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks Jackson Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jackson Whitewood Ynez $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.32 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Palomar Nutmeg $1,562,000 $1,562,000 $44,000 0% 0% 0.07 0.10 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Nutmeg Murrieta Hot Springs $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.46 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Murrieta Hot Springs Cherry $30,634,000 $30,634,000 $227,000 0% 0% 0.47 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Keller I-215 Whitewood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.20 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Keller I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.09 0.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Los Alamos Jefferson I-215 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.24 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson I-215 $0 $0 $0 Between Hancock and I-215 17% 17% 0.62 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs I-215 Margarita $0 $0 $0 Between I-215 and I-215 NB On Ramp, and Alta Murrieta and St. Maria 11% 11% 0.82 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs Margarita SR-79 (Winchester) $4,057,000 $3,899,000 $101,000 Between Margarita and Calle del Lago 57% 57% 0.93 1.33 93% $158,000 $0 $158,000 $105,000 $4,000 $4,000 $162,000 Southwest Murrieta Nutmeg Jefferson Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Clinton Keith Los Alamos $2,708,000 $2,708,000 $77,000 0% 0% 0.45 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Los Alamos Murrieta Hot Springs $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Murrieta Hot Springs Jackson $4,629,000 $4,629,000 $47,000 0% 0% 0.15 0.16 $0 $0 $0 $47,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Ynez Jackson SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 1.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Murrieta Hot Springs Calle Chapos $816,000 $816,000 $0 0% 0% 0.61 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Calle Chapos La Serena $696,000 $696,000 $0 0% 0% 0.58 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage La Serena Rancho California $904,000 $904,000 $0 Between La Serena and Rancho California 100% 100% 0.95 1.21 85% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Rancho California Pauba $846,000 $846,000 $0 Between Rancho California and Creek 5% 5% 0.55 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Pauba SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $725,000 $725,000 $21,000 0% 0% 0.49 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Jefferson Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 $0 0% 0% 0.34 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Margarita Murrieta Hot Springs SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $7,644,000 $7,644,000 $0 Between Winchester and Campos Verdes, and Solana and 250 ft North of Ramsey 5% 5% 0.65 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Old Town Front Rancho California I-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.68 1.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy Via Gilberto Pechanga Pkwy $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.42 0.52 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Jefferson Margarita $18,254,000 $18,181,000 $101,000 Between I-15 SB On Ramp and I-15, and Moraga and Cosmic 40% 40% 0.90 1.37 99% $73,000 $0 $73,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $73,000 Southwest Temecula Rancho California I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.55 2.67 63% $12,098,000 $32,698,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Margarita Butterfield Stage $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.63 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) I-15 Pechanga Pkwy $0 $0 $0 Between I-15 and Pechanga 100% 100% 1.08 1.42 65% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Pechanga Pkwy Butterfield Stage $3,065,000 $3,065,000 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Briggs Scott SR-79 (Winchester) $6,509,000 $6,509,000 $169,000 0% 0% 0.41 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage Tucalota Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.41 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage (Pourroy) Auld Murrieta Hot Springs $23,076,000 $23,076,000 $656,000 Between Auld and Honey Pine 23% 12% 0.88 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $656,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Grand Ortega Corydon $68,025,000 $68,025,000 $505,000 Between Zinck and Stoneman, and Ontario and Corydon 16% 16% 0.80 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $505,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Horsethief Canyon Temescal Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.81 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Indian Truck Trail Temescal Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.15 0.21 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Murrieta Hot Springs SR-79 (Winchester) Pourroy $0 $0 $0 Between Winchester and Vons 4% 4% 0.46 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pala Pechanga San Diego County $0 $0 $0 Between Pechango and Rainbow Oaks 48% 48% 0.88 1.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pourroy SR-79 (Winchester) Auld $2,236,000 $2,236,000 $64,000 0% 0% 0.42 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Rancho California Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks $87,369,000 $87,369,000 $482,000 0% 0% 0.65 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Horsethief Canyon Wash bridge $3,340,000 $3,340,000 $115,000 0% 0% 0.66 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Truck Trail I-15 $15,739,000 $15,739,000 $447,000 0% 0% 0.64 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $447,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Wash bridge $1,462,000 $1,462,000 $50,000 0% 0% 0.61 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Mission I-15 $9,704,000 $9,704,000 $72,000 0% 0% 0.60 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Grand Corydon Wildomar Trail $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Mission Bundy Canyon Palomar $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.20 0.43 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Clinton Keith Washington $3,227,000 $3,227,000 $84,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Mission Clinton Keith $13,493,000 $13,493,000 $383,000 0% 0% 0.60 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $383,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail I-15 Baxter $1,281,000 $1,281,000 $33,000 Between I-15 SB On Ramp to Baxter 73% 73% 0.87 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $27,858,000 $0 0% 0% 0.94 1.15 85% $4,840,000 $0 $4,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,840,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Baxter Palomar $11,316,000 $11,316,000 $84,000 Between Baxter and Cervera 35% 35% 0.82 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Palomar Grand $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.87 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $2,508,329,000 $1,913,028,000 $23,597,000 13.2% $365,640,000 $264,315,000 $330,986,000 $32,098,000 $318,000 $318,000 $331,304,000 Totals Network 4,840,250,000$ 3,874,735,000$ 53,859,000$ 12.0% Network Unfunded Existing Need Adjustment 652,275,000$ 382,886,000$ 582,629,000$ 64,606,000$ 1,410,000$ 1,263,000$ 583,892,000$ Transit 217,870,000$ 154,831,000$ 28.9% Transit Existing Need Adjustment 63,039,000$ Administration 161,183,000$ 161,183,000$
MSHCP 64,606,000$ 53,859,000$ 1,263,000$ TOTAL 5,283,909,000$ 4,244,608,000$ 12.2% Total Unfunded Existing Need Adjustment 646,931,000$ EXHIBIT H-3 Regional Transit Existing Need Share
Summary of Transit Trip Change
Year Western Riverside
Daily Transit Trips
2023* 16,575
2045** 57,282
Growth 2023 - 2045 40,707
Existing Need Share: 28.9%
Future Growth Share: 71.1%
Notes:

Maximum TUMF Transit Component Value
RTA Transit Full
Mitigation Cost Existing Need Cost MAX TUMF TRANSIT VALUE $217,870,000 $63,039,000 $154,831,000
$4,297,490,440

3.6%
Total MAX TUMF VALUE
Transit Share of MAX TUMF VALUE
* - 2023 actual average weekday daily ridership provided by RTA staff December 1, 2023
** - 2045 forecast average weekday daily ridership obtained from SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model as provided by Fehr and Peers November WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 I-1
Appendix I - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Distribution In order to ensure an equitable regional/zonal distribution of potential TUMF revenues, the distribution of trips in the WRCOG region was analyzed to determine the distribution between local (intra-zonal) and regional (inter-zonal) trips. This analysis was completed using the Year 2040 No-Build scenario Origin-Destination (O-D) vehicle trip tables from RivCoM. The analysis of vehicle trips based on the respective trip ends as stratified by zone is considered sufficient to establish the rough proportionality between local (intra- zonal) and regional (inter-zonal) trips because this measure is intended to only serve as a guide in the distribution of potential TUMF revenues between regional and local projects, and is not intended to serve as the basis for quantifying the relative magnitude of the impacts of different types of new development on the TUMF network (as described in Appendix J)
The first step in the analysis was to create a correspondence table between the traffic analysis zones (TAZ’s) in the RivCoM model and the five WRCOG TUMF zones: Northwest, Central, Pass Area, Hemet/San Jacinto, and Southwest. A table detailing the TAZ correspondence for each WRCOG TUMF zone is included as Exhibit I-1 in this Appendix.

The vehicle trip tables by TAZ were aggregated to obtain the trip summary between six districts (five WRCOG TUMF Zones and one for the rest of Southern California region included in the model analysis area)
Table 5.1 and 5.2 of the Nexus Study produce a matrix of total combined AM and PM peak period vehicle trips between the six districts. This information is subsequently weighted by TUMF future network lane miles in Table 5.3 to determine the relative share of trips that can be allocated between the backbone network and secondary network. Exhibits I-2 through I-9 provide the corresponding peak period vehicle trip matrices for each of the four time periods analyzed by the RivCoM model (AM peak, midday, PM peak and overnight) as well as total daily trips between the six districts.

EXHIBIT I-1
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Hemet/San Jacinto TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 1008 Riverside Central Lake Elsinore 1197 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1857 Riverside Central Perris 1044 Riverside Central Menifee 1198 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1858 Riverside Central Perris 1045 Riverside Central Menifee 1199 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1859 Riverside Central Perris 1046 Riverside Central Menifee 1200 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1860 Riverside Central Perris 1047 Riverside Central Menifee 1201 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1861 Riverside Central Perris 1048 Riverside Central Menifee 1202 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1862 Riverside Central Perris 1049 Riverside Central Menifee 1203 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1863 Riverside Central Perris 1050 Riverside Central Menifee 1204 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1864 Riverside Central Perris 1051 Riverside Central Menifee 1205 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1865 Riverside Central Perris 1052 Riverside Central Menifee 1206 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1866 Riverside Central Perris 1053 Riverside Central Menifee 1207 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1867 Riverside Central Perris 1054 Riverside Central Menifee 1208 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1868 Riverside Central Perris 1055 Riverside Central Menifee 1209 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1869 Riverside Central Perris 1056 Riverside Central Menifee 1210 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1870 Riverside Central Perris 1057 Riverside Central Menifee 1211 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1871 Riverside Central Perris 1058 Riverside Central Menifee 1212 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1872 Riverside Central Perris 1059 Riverside Central Menifee 1213 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1873 Riverside Central Perris 1060 Riverside Central Menifee 1214 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1874 Riverside Central Perris 1061 Riverside Central Menifee 1215 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1875 Riverside Central Perris 1062 Riverside Central Menifee 1216 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1876 Riverside Central Perris 1063 Riverside Central Menifee 1217 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1877 Riverside Central Perris 1064 Riverside Central Menifee 1218 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1878 Riverside Central Perris 1065 Riverside Central Menifee 1219 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1879 Riverside Central Perris 1066 Riverside Central Menifee 1220 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2126 Riverside Central Riverside 1067 Riverside Central Menifee 1221 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2127 Riverside Central Riverside 1068 Riverside Central Menifee 1222 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2128 Riverside Central Riverside 1069 Riverside Central Menifee 1223 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2320 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1070 Riverside Central Menifee 1224 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2327 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1071 Riverside Central Menifee 1225 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2328 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1072 Riverside Central Menifee 1226 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2329 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1073 Riverside Central Menifee 1227 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2330 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1074 Riverside Central Menifee 1228 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2331 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1075 Riverside Central Menifee 1229 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2332 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1076 Riverside Central Menifee 1230 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2333 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1077 Riverside Central Menifee 1231 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2334 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1078 Riverside Central Menifee 1232 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2335 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1079 Riverside Central Menifee 1233 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2336 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1080 Riverside Central Menifee 1234 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2337 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1081 Riverside Central Menifee 1235 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2339 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1082 Riverside Central Menifee 1236 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2341 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1083 Riverside Central Menifee 1237 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2343 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1084 Riverside Central Menifee 1238 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2344 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1085 Riverside Central Menifee 1239 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2345 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1086 Riverside Central Menifee 1240 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2350 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1087 Riverside Central Menifee 1241 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2351 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1088 Riverside Central Menifee 1242 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2352 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1089 Riverside Central Menifee 1243 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2353 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1090 Riverside Central Menifee 1244 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2354 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1091 Riverside Central Menifee 1245 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2359 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1092 Riverside Central Menifee 1246 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2668 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1093 Riverside Central Menifee 1247 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2669 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1094 Riverside Central Menifee 1248 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2673 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1095 Riverside Central Menifee 1249 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2675 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1096 Riverside Central Menifee 1250 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2676 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1097 Riverside Central Menifee 1251 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2677 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1098 Riverside Central Menifee 1252 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2678 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1099 Riverside Central Menifee 1253 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2682 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1100 Riverside Central Menifee 1254 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2683 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1101 Riverside Central Menifee 1255 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2684 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1102 Riverside Central Menifee 1256 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2685 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1103 Riverside Central Menifee 1257 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2686 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1104 Riverside Central Menifee 1258 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2687 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1105 Riverside Central Menifee 1259 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2688 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1106 Riverside Central Menifee 1260 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2689 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1107 Riverside Central Menifee 1261 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2690 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1108 Riverside Central Menifee 1262 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2691 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1109 Riverside Central Menifee 1263 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2692 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1110 Riverside Central Menifee 1264 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2693 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1111 Riverside Central Menifee 1265 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2694 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1112 Riverside Central Menifee 1266 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2709 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1113 Riverside Central Menifee 1267 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2710 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1114 Riverside Central Menifee 1268 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2711 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1115 Riverside Central Menifee 1269 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2712 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1116 Riverside Central Menifee 1270 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2713 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1117 Riverside Central Menifee 1271 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2714 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1118 Riverside Central Menifee 1272 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2715 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1119 Riverside Central Menifee 1273 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2716 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1120 Riverside Central Menifee 1274 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2717 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1121 Riverside Central Menifee 1275 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2719 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1122 Riverside Central Menifee 1276 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2721 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1123 Riverside Central Menifee 1277 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2722 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1124 Riverside Central Menifee 1279 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2723 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1125 Riverside Central Menifee 1280 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2724 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1126 Riverside Central Menifee 1281 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2725 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1127 Riverside Central Menifee 1282 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2727 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1128 Riverside Central Menifee 1283 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2728 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1129 Riverside Central Menifee 1284 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2729 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1130 Riverside Central Menifee 1285 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 2733 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1131 Riverside Central Menifee 1793 Riverside Central Perris 2744 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1132 Riverside Central Menifee 1794 Riverside Central Perris 2745 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1133 Riverside Central Menifee 1795 Riverside Central Perris 2746 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1134 Riverside Central Menifee 1796 Riverside Central Perris 2747 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1135 Riverside Central Menifee 1797 Riverside Central Perris 2748 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1136 Riverside Central Menifee 1798 Riverside Central Perris 2752 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1137 Riverside Central Menifee 1799 Riverside Central Perris 2753 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1138 Riverside Central Menifee 1800 Riverside Central Perris 2754 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1139 Riverside Central Menifee 1801 Riverside Central Perris 2755 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1140 Riverside Central Menifee 1802 Riverside Central Perris 2756 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1141 Riverside Central Menifee 1803 Riverside Central Perris 2757 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1142 Riverside Central Menifee 1804 Riverside Central Perris 2758 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1143 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1805 Riverside Central Perris 2759 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1144 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1806 Riverside Central Perris 2760 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1145 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1807 Riverside Central Perris 2761 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1146 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1808 Riverside Central Perris 2762 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1147 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1809 Riverside Central Perris 2780 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1148 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1810 Riverside Central Perris 2781 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1149 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1811 Riverside Central Perris 2782 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1150 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1812 Riverside Central Perris 2783 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1151 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1813 Riverside Central Perris 2784 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1152 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1814 Riverside Central Perris 2785 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1153 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1815 Riverside Central Perris 2786 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1154 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1816 Riverside Central Perris 2787 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1155 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1817 Riverside Central Perris 2788 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1156 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1818 Riverside Central Perris 2789 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1157 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1819 Riverside Central Perris 2793 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1158 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1820 Riverside Central Perris 2794 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1159 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1821 Riverside Central Perris 2795 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1160 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1822 Riverside Central Perris 2796 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1161 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1823 Riverside Central Perris 2797 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1162 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1824 Riverside Central Perris 2802 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1163 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1825 Riverside Central Perris 2804 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1164 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1826 Riverside Central Perris 2807 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1165 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1827 Riverside Central Perris 2809 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1166 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1828 Riverside Central Perris 2825 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1167 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1829 Riverside Central Perris 2853 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1168 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1830 Riverside Central Perris 2857 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1169 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1831 Riverside Central Perris 2862 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1170 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1832 Riverside Central Perris 2863 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1171 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1833 Riverside Central Perris 2864 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1172 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1834 Riverside Central Perris 2869 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1173 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1835 Riverside Central Perris 2870 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1174 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1836 Riverside Central Perris 2872 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1175 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1837 Riverside Central Perris 2875 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1176 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1838 Riverside Central Perris 2877 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1177 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1839 Riverside Central Perris 2878 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1178 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1840 Riverside Central Perris 2879 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1179 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1841 Riverside Central Perris 2880 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1180 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1842 Riverside Central Perris 2905 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1181 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1843 Riverside Central Perris 2906 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1182 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1844 Riverside Central Perris 2907 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1183 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1845 Riverside Central Perris 3177 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1184 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1846 Riverside Central Perris 3183 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1185 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1847 Riverside Central Perris 3225 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1186 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1848 Riverside Central Perris 3227 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1187 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1849 Riverside Central Perris 3228 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1188 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1850 Riverside Central Perris 3229 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1189 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1851 Riverside Central Perris 3230 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1190 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1852 Riverside Central Perris 3231 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1191 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1853 Riverside Central Perris 3232 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1192 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1854 Riverside Central Perris 3233 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1193 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1855 Riverside Central Perris 3235 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1194 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1856 Riverside Central Perris 3236 Riverside Central Unincorporated 1195 Riverside Central Moreno Valley
1196 Riverside Central Moreno Valley
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Hemet/San Jacinto TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 642 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2135 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2625 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 643 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2136 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2626 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 644 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2137 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2628 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 645 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2138 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2630 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 646 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2139 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2631 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 647 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2140 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2632 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 648 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2141 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2633 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 649 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2142 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2634 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 650 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2143 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2635 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 651 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2144 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2641 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 652 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2145 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2642 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 653 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2146 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2643 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 654 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2147 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2644 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 655 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2148 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2645 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 656 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2149 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2646 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 657 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2150 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2647 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 658 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2151 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2648 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 659 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2152 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2649 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 660 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2153 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2651 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 661 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2154 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2652 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 662 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2155 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2653 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 663 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2156 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2654 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 664 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2157 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2655 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 665 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2158 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2660 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 666 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2159 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2670 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 667 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2160 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2679 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 668 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2161 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2810 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 669 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2162 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2811 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 670 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2163 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2812 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 671 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2164 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2815 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 672 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2165 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2816 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 673 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2166 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2817 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 674 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2167 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2818 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 675 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2168 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2819 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 676 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2169 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2820 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 677 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2170 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2821 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 678 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2171 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2822 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 679 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2172 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2823 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 680 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2173 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2824 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 681 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2174 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2826 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 682 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2175 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2827 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 683 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2176 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2828 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 684 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2177 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2829 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 685 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2178 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2830 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 686 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2179 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2831 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 687 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2180 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2832 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 688 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2181 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2833 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 689 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2182 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2834 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 690 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2183 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2835 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 691 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2184 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2836 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 692 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2185 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2839 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 693 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2186 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2840 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 694 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2187 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2841 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 695 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2188 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2842 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 696 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2189 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2843 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 697 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2190 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2844 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 698 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2191 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2845 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 699 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2192 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2848 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 700 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2193 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2850 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 701 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2194 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2851 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 702 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2195 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2856 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 703 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2196 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2865 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 704 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2197 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2866 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 705 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2198 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2867 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 706 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2199 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2868 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 707 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2200 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2871 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 708 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2201 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2873 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 709 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2202 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2874 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 710 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2203 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2876 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 711 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2204 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2881 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 712 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2205 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2882 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 713 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2206 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2883 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 714 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2207 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2884 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 715 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2324 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2885 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 716 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2325 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2886 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 717 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2326 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2887 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 718 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2338 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2888 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 719 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2340 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2889 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 720 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2342 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2890 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 721 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2346 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2891 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 722 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2347 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2892 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 723 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2348 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2893 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 724 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2349 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2894 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 725 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2358 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2895 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 726 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2360 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2919 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 727 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2361 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2920 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 728 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2362 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2921 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 729 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2471 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2922 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 730 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2472 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2934 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 731 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2491 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2935 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 732 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2493 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2936 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 733 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2494 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2937 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 734 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2625 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2938 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 735 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2626 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3194 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 736 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2628 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3195 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 737 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2630 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3196 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 738 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 2631 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3197 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3198 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated
3242 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated
3243 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated
3244 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated
3245 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Northwest TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 332 Riverside Northwest Corona 520 Riverside Northwest Corona 1910 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2090 Riverside Northwest Riverside 333 Riverside Northwest Corona 521 Riverside Northwest Corona 1911 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2091 Riverside Northwest Riverside 334 Riverside Northwest Corona 522 Riverside Northwest Corona 1912 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2092 Riverside Northwest Riverside 335 Riverside Northwest Corona 523 Riverside Northwest Corona 1913 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2093 Riverside Northwest Riverside 336 Riverside Northwest Corona 524 Riverside Northwest Corona 1914 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2094 Riverside Northwest Riverside 337 Riverside Northwest Corona 525 Riverside Northwest Corona 1915 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2095 Riverside Northwest Riverside 338 Riverside Northwest Corona 526 Riverside Northwest Corona 1916 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2096 Riverside Northwest Riverside 339 Riverside Northwest Corona 527 Riverside Northwest Corona 1917 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2097 Riverside Northwest Riverside 340 Riverside Northwest Corona 528 Riverside Northwest Corona 1918 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2098 Riverside Northwest Riverside 341 Riverside Northwest Corona 529 Riverside Northwest Corona 1919 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2099 Riverside Northwest Riverside 342 Riverside Northwest Corona 530 Riverside Northwest Corona 1920 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2100 Riverside Northwest Riverside 343 Riverside Northwest Corona 531 Riverside Northwest Corona 1921 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2101 Riverside Northwest Riverside 344 Riverside Northwest Corona 532 Riverside Northwest Corona 1922 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2102 Riverside Northwest Riverside 345 Riverside Northwest Corona 533 Riverside Northwest Corona 1923 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2103 Riverside Northwest Riverside 346 Riverside Northwest Corona 534 Riverside Northwest Corona 1924 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2104 Riverside Northwest Riverside 347 Riverside Northwest Corona 535 Riverside Northwest Corona 1925 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2105 Riverside Northwest Riverside 348 Riverside Northwest Corona 536 Riverside Northwest Corona 1926 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2106 Riverside Northwest Riverside 349 Riverside Northwest Corona 537 Riverside Northwest Corona 1927 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2107 Riverside Northwest Riverside 350 Riverside Northwest Corona 538 Riverside Northwest Corona 1928 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2108 Riverside Northwest Riverside 351 Riverside Northwest Corona 539 Riverside Northwest Corona 1929 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2109 Riverside Northwest Riverside 352 Riverside Northwest Corona 540 Riverside Northwest Corona 1930 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2110 Riverside Northwest Riverside 353 Riverside Northwest Corona 541 Riverside Northwest Corona 1931 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2111 Riverside Northwest Riverside 354 Riverside Northwest Corona 542 Riverside Northwest Corona 1932 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2112 Riverside Northwest Riverside 355 Riverside Northwest Corona 543 Riverside Northwest Corona 1933 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2113 Riverside Northwest Riverside 356 Riverside Northwest Corona 544 Riverside Northwest Corona 1934 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2114 Riverside Northwest Riverside 357 Riverside Northwest Corona 545 Riverside Northwest Corona 1935 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2115 Riverside Northwest Riverside 358 Riverside Northwest Corona 546 Riverside Northwest Corona 1936 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2116 Riverside Northwest Riverside 359 Riverside Northwest Corona 547 Riverside Northwest Corona 1937 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2117 Riverside Northwest Riverside 360 Riverside Northwest Corona 548 Riverside Northwest Corona 1938 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2118 Riverside Northwest Riverside 361 Riverside Northwest Corona 549 Riverside Northwest Corona 1939 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2119 Riverside Northwest Riverside 362 Riverside Northwest Corona 550 Riverside Northwest Corona 1940 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2120 Riverside Northwest Riverside 363 Riverside Northwest Corona 551 Riverside Northwest Corona 1941 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2121 Riverside Northwest Riverside 364 Riverside Northwest Corona 552 Riverside Northwest Corona 1942 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2122 Riverside Northwest Riverside 365 Riverside Northwest Corona 553 Riverside Northwest Corona 1943 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2123 Riverside Northwest Riverside 366 Riverside Northwest Corona 554 Riverside Northwest Corona 1944 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2124 Riverside Northwest Riverside 367 Riverside Northwest Corona 555 Riverside Northwest Corona 1945 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2125 Riverside Northwest Riverside 368 Riverside Northwest Corona 556 Riverside Northwest Corona 1946 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2129 Riverside Northwest Riverside 369 Riverside Northwest Corona 557 Riverside Northwest Corona 1947 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2130 Riverside Northwest Riverside 370 Riverside Northwest Corona 558 Riverside Northwest Corona 1948 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2131 Riverside Northwest Riverside 371 Riverside Northwest Corona 559 Riverside Northwest Corona 1949 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2132 Riverside Northwest Riverside 372 Riverside Northwest Corona 560 Riverside Northwest Corona 1950 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2133 Riverside Northwest Riverside 373 Riverside Northwest Corona 561 Riverside Northwest Corona 1951 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2134 Riverside Northwest Riverside 374 Riverside Northwest Corona 562 Riverside Northwest Corona 1952 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2321 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 375 Riverside Northwest Corona 563 Riverside Northwest Corona 1953 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2322 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 376 Riverside Northwest Corona 564 Riverside Northwest Corona 1954 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2370 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 377 Riverside Northwest Corona 565 Riverside Northwest Corona 1955 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2371 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 378 Riverside Northwest Corona 566 Riverside Northwest Corona 1956 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2372 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 379 Riverside Northwest Corona 567 Riverside Northwest Corona 1957 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2373 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 380 Riverside Northwest Corona 568 Riverside Northwest Corona 1958 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2374 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 381 Riverside Northwest Corona 569 Riverside Northwest Corona 1959 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2375 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 382 Riverside Northwest Corona 603 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1960 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2376 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 383 Riverside Northwest Corona 604 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1961 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2377 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 384 Riverside Northwest Corona 605 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1962 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2378 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 385 Riverside Northwest Corona 606 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1963 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2379 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 386 Riverside Northwest Corona 607 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1964 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2380 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 387 Riverside Northwest Corona 608 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1965 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2381 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 388 Riverside Northwest Corona 609 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1966 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2382 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 389 Riverside Northwest Corona 610 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1967 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2383 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 390 Riverside Northwest Corona 611 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1968 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2384 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 391 Riverside Northwest Corona 612 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1969 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2385 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 392 Riverside Northwest Corona 613 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1970 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2386 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 393 Riverside Northwest Corona 614 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1971 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2387 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 394 Riverside Northwest Corona 615 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1972 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2388 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 395 Riverside Northwest Corona 616 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1973 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2389 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 396 Riverside Northwest Corona 617 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1974 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2390 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 397 Riverside Northwest Corona 618 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1975 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2391 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 398 Riverside Northwest Corona 619 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1976 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2392 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 399 Riverside Northwest Corona 620 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1977 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2393 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 400 Riverside Northwest Corona 621 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1978 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2394 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 401 Riverside Northwest Corona 622 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1979 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2397 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 402 Riverside Northwest Corona 623 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1980 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2398 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 403 Riverside Northwest Corona 624 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1981 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2399 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 404 Riverside Northwest Corona 625 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1982 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2400 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 405 Riverside Northwest Corona 626 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1983 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2401 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 406 Riverside Northwest Corona 627 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1984 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2402 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 407 Riverside Northwest Corona 628 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1985 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2403 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 408 Riverside Northwest Corona 629 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1986 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2404 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 409 Riverside Northwest Corona 630 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1987 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2405 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 410 Riverside Northwest Corona 631 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1988 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2406 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 411 Riverside Northwest Corona 632 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1989 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2407 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 412 Riverside Northwest Corona 633 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1990 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2408 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 413 Riverside Northwest Corona 634 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1991 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2409 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 414 Riverside Northwest Corona 635 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1992 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2410 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 415 Riverside Northwest Corona 636 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1993 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2411 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 416 Riverside Northwest Corona 637 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1994 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2412 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 417 Riverside Northwest Corona 638 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1995 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2413 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 418 Riverside Northwest Corona 639 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1996 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2586 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 419 Riverside Northwest Corona 640 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1997 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2587 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 420 Riverside Northwest Corona 641 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 1998 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2588 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 421 Riverside Northwest Corona 842 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 1999 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2589 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 422 Riverside Northwest Corona 843 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2000 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2590 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 423 Riverside Northwest Corona 844 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2001 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2591 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 424 Riverside Northwest Corona 845 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2002 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2592 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 425 Riverside Northwest Corona 846 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2003 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2593 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 426 Riverside Northwest Corona 847 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2004 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2594 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 427 Riverside Northwest Corona 848 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2005 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2595 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 428 Riverside Northwest Corona 849 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2006 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2596 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 429 Riverside Northwest Corona 850 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2007 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2597 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 430 Riverside Northwest Corona 851 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2008 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2598 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 431 Riverside Northwest Corona 852 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2009 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2599 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 432 Riverside Northwest Corona 853 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2010 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2600 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 433 Riverside Northwest Corona 854 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2011 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2601 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 434 Riverside Northwest Corona 855 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2012 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2602 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 435 Riverside Northwest Corona 856 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2013 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2603 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 436 Riverside Northwest Corona 857 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2014 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2604 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 437 Riverside Northwest Corona 858 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2015 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2605 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 438 Riverside Northwest Corona 859 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2016 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2606 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 439 Riverside Northwest Corona 860 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2017 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2607 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 440 Riverside Northwest Corona 861 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2018 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2664 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 441 Riverside Northwest Corona 862 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2019 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2666 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 442 Riverside Northwest Corona 863 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2020 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2671 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 443 Riverside Northwest Corona 864 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2021 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2672 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 444 Riverside Northwest Corona 865 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2022 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2680 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 445 Riverside Northwest Corona 866 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2023 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2681 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 446 Riverside Northwest Corona 867 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2024 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2705 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 447 Riverside Northwest Corona 868 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2025 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2706 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 448 Riverside Northwest Corona 869 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2026 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2707 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 449 Riverside Northwest Corona 870 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2027 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2726 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 450 Riverside Northwest Corona 871 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2028 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2730 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 451 Riverside Northwest Corona 872 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2029 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2731 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 452 Riverside Northwest Corona 873 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2030 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2732 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 453 Riverside Northwest Corona 874 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2031 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2734 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 454 Riverside Northwest Corona 875 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2032 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2735 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 455 Riverside Northwest Corona 876 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2033 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2736 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 456 Riverside Northwest Corona 877 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2034 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2737 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 457 Riverside Northwest Corona 878 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2035 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2738 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 458 Riverside Northwest Corona 879 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2036 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2739 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 459 Riverside Northwest Corona 880 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2037 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2740 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 460 Riverside Northwest Corona 881 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2038 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2741 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 461 Riverside Northwest Corona 882 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2039 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2742 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 462 Riverside Northwest Corona 883 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2040 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2743 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 463 Riverside Northwest Corona 884 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2041 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2749 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 464 Riverside Northwest Corona 885 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2042 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2750 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 465 Riverside Northwest Corona 886 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2043 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2751 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 466 Riverside Northwest Corona 887 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2044 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2763 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 467 Riverside Northwest Corona 888 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2045 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2764 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 468 Riverside Northwest Corona 889 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2046 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2765 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 469 Riverside Northwest Corona 890 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2047 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2766 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 470 Riverside Northwest Corona 891 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2048 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2767 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 471 Riverside Northwest Corona 892 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2049 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2768 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 472 Riverside Northwest Corona 893 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2050 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2769 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 473 Riverside Northwest Corona 894 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2051 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2770 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 474 Riverside Northwest Corona 895 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2052 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2771 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 475 Riverside Northwest Corona 896 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2053 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2772 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 476 Riverside Northwest Corona 897 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2054 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2773 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 477 Riverside Northwest Corona 898 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2055 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2774 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 478 Riverside Northwest Corona 899 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2056 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2775 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 479 Riverside Northwest Corona 900 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2057 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2776 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 480 Riverside Northwest Corona 901 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2058 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2777 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 481 Riverside Northwest Corona 902 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2059 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2778 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 482 Riverside Northwest Corona 903 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 2060 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2779 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 483 Riverside Northwest Corona 1540 Riverside Northwest Norco 2061 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2790 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 484 Riverside Northwest Corona 1541 Riverside Northwest Norco 2062 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2791 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 485 Riverside Northwest Corona 1542 Riverside Northwest Norco 2063 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2792 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 486 Riverside Northwest Corona 1543 Riverside Northwest Norco 2064 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2798 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 487 Riverside Northwest Corona 1544 Riverside Northwest Norco 2065 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2799 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 488 Riverside Northwest Corona 1545 Riverside Northwest Norco 2066 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2800 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 489 Riverside Northwest Corona 1546 Riverside Northwest Norco 2067 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2801 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 490 Riverside Northwest Corona 1547 Riverside Northwest Norco 2068 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2803 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 491 Riverside Northwest Corona 1548 Riverside Northwest Norco 2069 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2805 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 492 Riverside Northwest Corona 1549 Riverside Northwest Norco 2070 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2806 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 493 Riverside Northwest Corona 1550 Riverside Northwest Norco 2071 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2808 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 494 Riverside Northwest Corona 1551 Riverside Northwest Norco 2072 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3093 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 495 Riverside Northwest Corona 1552 Riverside Northwest Norco 2073 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3146 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 496 Riverside Northwest Corona 1553 Riverside Northwest Norco 2074 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3147 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 497 Riverside Northwest Corona 1554 Riverside Northwest Norco 2075 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3148 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 498 Riverside Northwest Corona 1555 Riverside Northwest Norco 2076 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3149 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 499 Riverside Northwest Corona 1556 Riverside Northwest Norco 2077 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3152 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 500 Riverside Northwest Corona 1557 Riverside Northwest Norco 2078 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3174 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 501 Riverside Northwest Corona 1558 Riverside Northwest Norco 2079 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3185 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 502 Riverside Northwest Corona 1559 Riverside Northwest Norco 2080 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3186 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 503 Riverside Northwest Corona 1560 Riverside Northwest Norco 2081 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3187 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 504 Riverside Northwest Corona 1561 Riverside Northwest Norco 2082 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3188 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 505 Riverside Northwest Corona 1562 Riverside Northwest Norco 2083 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3189 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 506 Riverside Northwest Corona 1563 Riverside Northwest Norco 2084 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3190 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 507 Riverside Northwest Corona 1564 Riverside Northwest Norco 2085 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3191 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 508 Riverside Northwest Corona 1565 Riverside Northwest Norco 2086 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3192 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 509 Riverside Northwest Corona 1566 Riverside Northwest Norco 2087 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3193 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 510 Riverside Northwest Corona 1567 Riverside Northwest Norco 2088 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3203 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 511 Riverside Northwest Corona 1568 Riverside Northwest Norco 2089 Riverside Northwest Riverside 3204 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 512 Riverside Northwest Corona 3206 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 513 Riverside Northwest Corona
514 Riverside Northwest Corona
515 Riverside Northwest Corona
516 Riverside Northwest Corona
517 Riverside Northwest Corona
518 Riverside Northwest Corona
519 Riverside Northwest Corona
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Pass
TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City
1 Riverside Pass Banning 128 Riverside Pass Calimesa
2 Riverside Pass Banning 129 Riverside Pass Calimesa
3 Riverside Pass Banning 130 Riverside Pass Calimesa
4 Riverside Pass Banning 131 Riverside Pass Calimesa
5 Riverside Pass Banning 132 Riverside Pass Calimesa
6 Riverside Pass Banning 133 Riverside Pass Calimesa
7 Riverside Pass Banning 134 Riverside Pass Calimesa
8 Riverside Pass Banning 135 Riverside Pass Calimesa
9 Riverside Pass Banning 136 Riverside Pass Calimesa
10 Riverside Pass Banning 137 Riverside Pass Calimesa
11 Riverside Pass Banning 138 Riverside Pass Calimesa
12 Riverside Pass Banning 139 Riverside Pass Calimesa
13 Riverside Pass Banning 140 Riverside Pass Calimesa
14 Riverside Pass Banning 141 Riverside Pass Calimesa
15 Riverside Pass Banning 142 Riverside Pass Calimesa
16 Riverside Pass Banning 143 Riverside Pass Calimesa
17 Riverside Pass Banning 144 Riverside Pass Calimesa
18 Riverside Pass Banning 145 Riverside Pass Calimesa
19 Riverside Pass Banning 146 Riverside Pass Calimesa
20 Riverside Pass Banning 147 Riverside Pass Calimesa
21 Riverside Pass Banning 148 Riverside Pass Calimesa
22 Riverside Pass Banning 149 Riverside Pass Calimesa
23 Riverside Pass Banning 150 Riverside Pass Calimesa
24 Riverside Pass Banning 151 Riverside Pass Calimesa
25 Riverside Pass Banning 152 Riverside Pass Calimesa
26 Riverside Pass Banning 153 Riverside Pass Calimesa
27 Riverside Pass Banning 154 Riverside Pass Calimesa
28 Riverside Pass Banning 1278 Riverside Pass Moreno Valley 29 Riverside Pass Banning 2323 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 30 Riverside Pass Banning 2355 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 31 Riverside Pass Banning 2356 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 32 Riverside Pass Banning 2357 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 33 Riverside Pass Banning 2363 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 34 Riverside Pass Banning 2364 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 35 Riverside Pass Banning 2365 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 36 Riverside Pass Banning 2627 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 37 Riverside Pass Banning 2629 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 38 Riverside Pass Banning 2638 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 39 Riverside Pass Banning 2639 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 40 Riverside Pass Banning 2640 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 41 Riverside Pass Banning 2650 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 42 Riverside Pass Banning 2656 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 43 Riverside Pass Banning 2657 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 44 Riverside Pass Banning 2658 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 45 Riverside Pass Banning 2659 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 46 Riverside Pass Banning 2661 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 47 Riverside Pass Banning 2667 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 48 Riverside Pass Banning 2674 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 49 Riverside Pass Banning 2858 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 50 Riverside Pass Banning 2859 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 51 Riverside Pass Banning 2896 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 52 Riverside Pass Banning 2897 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 53 Riverside Pass Banning 2898 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 54 Riverside Pass Banning 2899 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 55 Riverside Pass Banning 2900 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 56 Riverside Pass Banning 2901 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 57 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2902 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 58 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2903 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 59 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2904 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 60 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2908 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 61 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2909 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 62 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2910 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 63 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2911 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 64 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2912 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 65 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2913 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 66 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2914 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 67 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2915 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 68 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2916 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 69 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2917 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 70 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2927 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 71 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2939 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 72 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2940 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 73 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2941 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 74 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2942 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 75 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2943 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 76 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2944 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 77 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2945 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 78 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2946 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 79 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2947 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 80 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2948 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 81 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2949 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 82 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2950 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 83 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2951 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 84 Riverside Pass Beaumont 2952 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 85 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3042 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 86 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3156 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 87 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3157 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 88 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3158 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 89 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3159 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 90 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3160 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 91 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3161 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 92 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3164 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 93 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3216 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 94 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3217 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 95 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3218 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 96 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3219 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 97 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3220 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 98 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3221 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 99 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3222 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 100 Riverside Pass Beaumont 3223 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 101 Riverside Pass Beaumont
102 Riverside Pass Beaumont
103 Riverside Pass Beaumont
104 Riverside Pass Beaumont
105 Riverside Pass Beaumont
106 Riverside Pass Beaumont
107 Riverside Pass Beaumont
108 Riverside Pass Beaumont
109 Riverside Pass Beaumont
110 Riverside Pass Beaumont
111 Riverside Pass Beaumont
112 Riverside Pass Beaumont
113 Riverside Pass Beaumont
114 Riverside Pass Beaumont
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Southwest TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 155 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1351 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1531 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2541 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 156 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1352 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1532 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2542 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 157 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1353 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1533 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2543 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 158 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1354 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1534 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2544 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 159 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1355 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1535 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2545 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 160 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1356 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1536 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2546 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 161 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 1357 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1537 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2547 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 938 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1358 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1538 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2548 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 939 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1359 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1539 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2549 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 940 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1360 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2208 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2550 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 941 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1361 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2209 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2551 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 942 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1362 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2210 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2552 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 943 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1363 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2211 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2553 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 944 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1364 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2212 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2554 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 945 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1365 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2213 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2555 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 946 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1366 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2214 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2556 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 947 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1367 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2215 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2557 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 948 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1368 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2216 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2558 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 949 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1369 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2217 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2559 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 950 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1370 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2218 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2560 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 951 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1371 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2219 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2561 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 952 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1372 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2220 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2562 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 953 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1373 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2221 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2563 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 954 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1374 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2222 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2564 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 955 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1375 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2223 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2582 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 956 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1376 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2224 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2583 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 957 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1377 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2225 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2584 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 958 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1378 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2226 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2585 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 959 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1379 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2227 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2662 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 960 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1380 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2228 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2663 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 961 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1381 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2229 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2665 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 962 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1382 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2230 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2695 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 963 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1383 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2231 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2696 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 964 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1384 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2232 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2697 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 965 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1385 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2233 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2698 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 966 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1386 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2234 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2699 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 967 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1387 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2235 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2700 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 968 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1388 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2236 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2701 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 969 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1389 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2237 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2702 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 970 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1390 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2238 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2703 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 971 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1391 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2239 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2704 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 972 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1392 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2240 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2708 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 973 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1393 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2241 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2718 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 974 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1394 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2242 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2720 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 975 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1395 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2243 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2813 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 976 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1396 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2244 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2814 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 977 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1397 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2245 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2837 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 978 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1398 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2246 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2838 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 979 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1399 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2247 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2846 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 980 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1400 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2248 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2847 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 981 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1401 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2249 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2849 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 982 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1402 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2250 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2852 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 983 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1403 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2251 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2854 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 984 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1404 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2252 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2855 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 985 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1405 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2253 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2860 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 986 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1406 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2254 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2861 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 987 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1407 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2255 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3091 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 988 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1408 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2256 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3092 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 989 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1409 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2257 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3094 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 990 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1410 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2258 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3095 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 991 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1411 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2259 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3096 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 992 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1412 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2260 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3097 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 993 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1413 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2261 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3098 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 994 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1414 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2262 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3099 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 995 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1415 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2263 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3100 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 996 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1416 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2264 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3101 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 997 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1417 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2265 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3102 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 998 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1418 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2266 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3103 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 999 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1419 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2267 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3104 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1000 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1420 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2268 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3105 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1001 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1421 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2269 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3106 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1002 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1422 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2270 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3108 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1003 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1423 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2271 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3109 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1004 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1424 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2272 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3110 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1005 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1425 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2273 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3111 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1006 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1426 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2274 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3112 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1007 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1427 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2275 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3113 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1009 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1428 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2276 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3114 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1010 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1429 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2277 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3115 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1011 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1430 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2278 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3116 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1012 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1431 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2279 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3117 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1013 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1432 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2280 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3118 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1014 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1433 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2281 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3119 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1015 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1434 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2282 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3120 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1016 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1435 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2283 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3121 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1017 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1436 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2284 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3122 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1018 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1437 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2285 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3123 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1019 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1438 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2286 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3124 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1020 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1439 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2287 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3125 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1021 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1440 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2288 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3126 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1022 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1441 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2289 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3127 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1023 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1442 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2290 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3128 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1024 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1443 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2291 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3129 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1025 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1444 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2292 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3130 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1026 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1445 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2293 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3131 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1027 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1446 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2294 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3132 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1028 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1447 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2295 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3133 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1029 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1448 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2296 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3134 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1030 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1449 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2297 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3135 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1031 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1450 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2298 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3136 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1032 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1451 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2299 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3137 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1033 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1452 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2300 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3138 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1034 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1453 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2301 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3145 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1035 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1454 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2302 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3150 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1036 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1455 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2303 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3176 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1037 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1456 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2304 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3199 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1038 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1457 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2305 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3200 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1039 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1458 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2306 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3201 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1040 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1459 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2307 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3202 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1041 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1460 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2308 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3205 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1042 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1461 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2309 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3207 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1043 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1462 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2310 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3212 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1286 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1463 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2311 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3213 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1287 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1464 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2312 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3214 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1288 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1465 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2313 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3224 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1289 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1466 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2314 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3226 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1290 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1467 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2315 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3234 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1291 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1468 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2316 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3237 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1292 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1469 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2317 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3238 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1293 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1470 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2318 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3239 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1294 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1471 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2319 Riverside Southwest Temecula 3240 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1295 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1472 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2395 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3241 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 1296 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1473 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2396 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3246 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1297 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1474 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2414 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3247 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1298 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1475 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2422 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3248 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1299 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1476 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2423 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3249 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1300 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1477 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2424 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3250 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1301 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1478 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2425 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3251 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1302 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1479 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2426 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3252 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1303 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1480 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2427 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3253 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1304 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1481 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2428 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3254 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1305 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1482 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2429 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3255 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1306 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1483 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2465 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3256 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1307 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1484 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2466 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3257 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1308 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1485 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2467 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3258 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1309 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1486 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2473 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3259 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1310 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1487 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2474 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3260 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1311 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1488 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2475 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3261 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1312 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1489 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2476 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3262 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1313 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1490 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2477 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3263 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1314 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1491 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2478 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3264 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1315 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1492 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2479 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3265 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1316 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1493 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2480 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3266 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1317 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1494 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2481 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3267 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1318 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1495 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2492 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3268 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1319 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1496 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2495 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3269 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1320 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1497 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2496 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3270 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1321 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1498 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2497 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3271 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1322 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1499 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2498 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3272 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1323 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1500 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2499 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3273 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1324 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1501 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2500 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3274 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1325 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1502 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2501 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3275 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1326 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1503 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2509 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3276 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1327 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1504 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2510 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3277 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1328 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1505 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2511 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3278 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1329 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1506 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2512 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3279 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1330 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1507 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2518 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3280 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1331 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1508 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2519 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3281 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1332 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1509 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2520 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3282 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1333 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1510 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2521 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3283 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1334 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1511 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2522 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3284 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1335 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1512 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2523 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3285 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1336 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1513 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2524 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3286 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1337 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1514 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2528 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3287 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1338 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1515 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2529 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3288 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1339 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1516 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2530 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3289 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1340 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1517 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2531 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3290 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1341 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1518 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2532 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3291 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1342 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1519 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2533 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3292 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1343 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1520 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2534 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3293 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1344 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1521 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2535 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3294 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1345 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1522 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2536 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3295 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1346 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1523 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2537 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3296 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1347 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1524 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2538 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3297 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1348 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1525 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2539 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3298 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1349 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1526 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2540 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3299 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 1350 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1527 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1528 Riverside Southwest Murrieta
1529 Riverside Southwest Murrieta
1530 Riverside Southwest Murrieta
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zones - Riverside County Outside WRCOG TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 115 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 739 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1661 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2516 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 116 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 740 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1662 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2517 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 117 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 741 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1663 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2525 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 118 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 742 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1664 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2526 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 119 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 743 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1665 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2527 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 120 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 744 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1666 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2565 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 121 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 745 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1667 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2566 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 122 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 746 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1668 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2567 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 123 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 747 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1669 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2568 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 124 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 748 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1670 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2569 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 125 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 749 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1671 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2570 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 126 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 750 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1672 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2571 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 127 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Blythe 751 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indian Wells 1673 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2572 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 162 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 752 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1674 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2573 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 163 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 753 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1675 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2574 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 164 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 754 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1676 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2575 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 165 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 755 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1677 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2576 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 166 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 756 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1678 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2577 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 167 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 757 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1679 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2578 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 168 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 758 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1680 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2579 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 169 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 759 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1681 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2580 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 170 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 760 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1682 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2581 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 171 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 761 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1683 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2608 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 172 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 762 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1684 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2609 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 173 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 763 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1685 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2610 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 174 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 764 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1686 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2611 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 175 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 765 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1687 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2612 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 176 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 766 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1688 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2613 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 177 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 767 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1689 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2614 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 178 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 768 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1690 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2615 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 179 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 769 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1691 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2616 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 180 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 770 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1692 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2617 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 181 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 771 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1693 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2618 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 182 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 772 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1694 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2619 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 183 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 773 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1695 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2620 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 184 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 774 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1696 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2621 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 185 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 775 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1697 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2622 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 186 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 776 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1698 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2623 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 187 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 777 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1699 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2624 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 188 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 778 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1700 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2636 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 189 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 779 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1701 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2637 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 190 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 780 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1702 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2918 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 191 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 781 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1703 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2923 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 192 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 782 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1704 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2924 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 193 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 783 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1705 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2925 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 194 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 784 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1706 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2926 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 195 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 785 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1707 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2928 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 196 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 786 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1708 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2929 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 197 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 787 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1709 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2930 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 198 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 788 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1710 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2931 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 199 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 789 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1711 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2932 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 200 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 790 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1712 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2933 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 201 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 791 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1713 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2953 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 202 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 792 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1714 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2954 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 203 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 793 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1715 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2955 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 204 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 794 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1716 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2956 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 205 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 795 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1717 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2957 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 206 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 796 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1718 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2958 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 207 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 797 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1719 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2959 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 208 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 798 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1720 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2960 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 209 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 799 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1721 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2961 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 210 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 800 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1722 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2962 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 211 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 801 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1723 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2963 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 212 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 802 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1724 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2964 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 213 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 803 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1725 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2965 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 214 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 804 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1726 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2966 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 215 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 805 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1727 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2967 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 216 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 806 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1728 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2968 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 217 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 807 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1729 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2969 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 218 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 808 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1730 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2970 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 219 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 809 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1731 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2971 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 220 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 810 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1732 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2972 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 221 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 811 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1733 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2973 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 222 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 812 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1734 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2974 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 223 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 813 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1735 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2975 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 224 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 814 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1736 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2976 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 225 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 815 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1737 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2977 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 226 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 816 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1738 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2978 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 227 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 817 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1739 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2979 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 228 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 818 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1740 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2980 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 229 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 819 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1741 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2981 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 230 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 820 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1742 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2982 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 231 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 821 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1743 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2983 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 232 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 822 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1744 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2984 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 233 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 823 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1745 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2985 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 234 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 824 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1746 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2986 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 235 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 825 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1747 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2987 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 236 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 826 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1748 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2988 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 237 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 827 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1749 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2989 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 238 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 828 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1750 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2990 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 239 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 829 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1751 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2991 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 240 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 830 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1752 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2992 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 241 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 831 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1753 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2993 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 242 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 832 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1754 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2994 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 243 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 833 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1755 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2995 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 244 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 834 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1756 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2996 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 245 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 835 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1757 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2997 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 246 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 836 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1758 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2998 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 247 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 837 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1759 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 2999 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 248 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 838 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1760 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3000 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 249 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 839 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1761 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3001 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 250 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 840 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1762 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3002 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 251 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 841 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Indio 1763 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3003 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 252 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 904 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1764 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3004 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 253 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 905 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1765 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3005 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 254 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 906 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1766 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3006 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 255 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 907 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1767 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3007 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 256 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 908 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1768 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3008 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 257 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 909 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1769 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3009 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 258 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 910 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1770 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3010 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 259 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 911 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1771 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3011 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 260 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 912 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1772 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3012 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 261 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 913 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1773 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3013 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 262 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 914 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1774 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3014 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 263 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 915 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1775 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3015 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 264 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 916 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1776 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3016 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 265 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 917 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1777 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3017 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 266 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 918 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1778 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3018 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 267 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 919 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1779 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3019 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 268 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 920 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1780 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3020 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 269 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 921 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1781 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3021 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 270 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 922 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1782 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3022 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 271 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 923 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1783 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3023 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 272 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 924 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1784 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3024 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 273 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 925 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1785 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3025 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 274 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 926 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1786 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3026 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 275 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 927 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1787 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3027 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 276 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 928 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1788 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3028 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 277 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 929 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1789 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3029 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 278 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 930 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1790 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3030 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 279 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 931 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1791 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3031 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 280 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 932 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1792 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 3032 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 281 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 933 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1880 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3033 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 282 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 934 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1881 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3034 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 283 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 935 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1882 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3035 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 284 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 936 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1883 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3036 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 285 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 937 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones La Quinta 1884 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3037 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 286 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1569 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1885 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3038 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 287 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1570 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1886 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3039 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 288 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1571 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1887 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3040 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 289 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1572 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1888 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3041 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 290 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1573 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1889 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3043 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 291 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1574 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1890 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3044 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 292 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1575 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1891 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3045 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 293 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1576 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1892 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3046 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 294 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1577 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1893 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3047 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 295 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1578 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1894 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3048 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 296 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1579 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1895 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3049 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 297 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1580 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1896 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3050 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 298 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1581 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1897 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3051 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 299 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1582 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1898 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3052 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 300 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1583 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1899 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3053 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 301 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1584 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1900 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3054 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 302 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1585 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1901 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3055 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 303 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1586 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1902 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3056 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 304 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1587 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1903 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3057 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 305 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1588 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1904 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3058 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 306 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1589 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1905 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3059 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 307 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1590 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1906 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3060 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 308 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1591 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1907 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3061 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 309 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1592 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1908 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3062 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 310 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1593 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1909 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 3063 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 311 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1594 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2366 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3064 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 312 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1595 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2367 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3065 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 313 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1596 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2368 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3066 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 314 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1597 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2369 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3067 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 315 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1598 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2415 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3068 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 316 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1599 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2416 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3069 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 317 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1600 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2417 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3070 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 318 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1601 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2418 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3071 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 319 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1602 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2419 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3072 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 320 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1603 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2420 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3073 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 321 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1604 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2421 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3074 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 322 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1605 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2430 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3075 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 323 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1606 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2431 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3076 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 324 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1607 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2432 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3077 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 325 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1608 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2433 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3078 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 326 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1609 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2434 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3079 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 327 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1610 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2435 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3080 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 328 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1611 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2436 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3081 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 329 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1612 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2437 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3082 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 330 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1613 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2438 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3083 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 331 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 1614 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2439 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3084 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 570 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1615 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2440 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3085 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 571 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1616 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2441 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3086 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 572 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1617 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2442 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3087 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 573 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1618 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2443 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3088 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 574 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1619 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2444 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3089 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 575 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1620 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2445 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3090 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 576 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1621 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2446 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3107 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 577 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1622 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2447 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3139 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 578 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1623 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2448 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3140 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 579 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1624 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2449 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3141 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 580 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1625 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2450 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3142 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 581 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1626 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2451 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3143 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 582 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1627 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2452 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3144 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 583 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1628 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2453 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3151 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 584 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1629 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2454 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3153 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 585 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1630 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2455 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3154 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 586 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1631 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2456 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3155 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 587 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1632 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2457 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3162 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 588 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1633 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2458 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3163 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 589 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1634 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2459 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3165 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 590 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1635 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2460 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3166 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 591 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1636 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2461 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3167 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 592 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1637 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2462 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3168 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 593 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1638 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2463 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3169 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 594 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1639 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2464 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3170 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 595 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1640 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2468 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3171 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 596 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1641 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2469 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3172 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 597 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1642 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2470 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3173 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 598 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1643 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2482 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3175 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 599 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1644 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2483 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3178 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 600 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1645 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2484 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3179 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 601 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1646 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2485 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3180 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 602 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Springs 1647 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2486 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3181 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1648 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2487 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3182 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1649 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2488 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3184 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1650 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2489 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3208 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1651 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2490 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3209 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1652 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2502 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3210 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1653 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2503 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3211 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1654 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2504 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3215 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1655 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2505 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1656 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2506 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1657 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2507 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1658 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2508 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1659 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2513 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 1660 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 2514 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2515 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated
EXHIBIT I-1 (continued)
RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zones - Outside Riverside County TAZ County WRCOG Zone TAZ County WRCOG Zone TAZ County WRCOG Zone 3300 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3384 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3370 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3301 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3385 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3371 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3302 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3386 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3372 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3303 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3387 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3373 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3304 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3388 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3374 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3305 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3389 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3375 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3306 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3390 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3376 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3307 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3391 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3377 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3308 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3392 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3378 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3309 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3393 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3379 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3310 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3394 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3380 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3311 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3395 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3381 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3312 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3396 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3382 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3313 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3397 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3383 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3314 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3398 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3315 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3399 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3316 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3400 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3317 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3401 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3318 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3402 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3319 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3403 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3320 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3404 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3321 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3405 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3322 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3406 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3323 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3407 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3324 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3408 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3325 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3409 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3326 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3410 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3327 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3411 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3328 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3412 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3329 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3413 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3330 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3414 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3331 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3415 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3332 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3416 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3333 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3417 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3334 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3418 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3335 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3419 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3336 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3420 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3337 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3421 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3338 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3422 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3339 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3423 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3340 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3424 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3341 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3425 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3342 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3426 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3343 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3427 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3344 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3428 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3345 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3429 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3346 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3430 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3347 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3431 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3348 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3432 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3349 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3433 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3350 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3434 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3351 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3435 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3352 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3436 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3353 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3437 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3354 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3438 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3355 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3439 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3356 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3440 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3357 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3441 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3358 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3442 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3359 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3443 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3360 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3444 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3361 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3445 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3362 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3446 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3363 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3447 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3364 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3448 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3365 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3449 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3366 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3450 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3367 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3451 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3368 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3452 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3369 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3453 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones 3454 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3455 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3456 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3457 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3458 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3459 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3460 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3461 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3462 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3463 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3464 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3465 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3466 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3467 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3468 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3469 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3470 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3471 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3472 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3473 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3474 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3475 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3476 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3477 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3478 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3479 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3480 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3481 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
3482 San Bernardino Outside TUMF Zones
TO
FROM Southwest
Central 187,280 10,596 40,037 2,900 24,865 25,446 291,124 Hemet/San Jacinto 13,060 93,350 3,815 3,847 7,263 8,090 129,424 Northwest 26,655 1,189 333,593 1,239 4,956 86,710 454,342 Pass Area 3,663 3,372 2,768 49,166 402 14,458 73,828
Southwest 25,061 7,304 14,708 914 298,362 27,954 374,302 Outside WRCOG 15,413 3,353 86,546 11,208 14,949 131,469 TOTAL 271,131 119,163 481,467 69,274 350,797 162,658 1,454,490 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 TO
FROM Southwest
Central 64.3% 3.6% 13.8% 1.0% 8.5% 8.7% 100%
Hemet/San Jacinto 10.1% 72.1% 2.9% 3.0% 5.6% 6.3% 100%
Northwest 5.9% 0.3% 73.4% 0.3% 1.1% 19.1% 100%
Pass Area 5.0% 4.6% 3.7% 66.6% 0.5% 19.6% 100%
Southwest 6.7% 2.0% 3.9% 0.2% 79.7% 7.5% 100%
* Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT I-3 - 2045 AM Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
EXHIBIT I-2 - 2045 AM Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
TO
FROM Southwest
Central 230,328 12,878 49,743 3,401 30,237 32,112 358,698 Hemet/San Jacinto 16,341 115,656 4,833 4,586 8,818 9,988 160,221 Northwest 31,923 1,495 409,641 1,448 6,076 109,331 559,914 Pass Area 4,405 4,214 3,346 61,219 506 17,876 91,566
Southwest 30,752 8,928 18,144 1,062 368,893 34,759 462,537 Outside WRCOG 18,495 4,221 106,166 13,282 18,918 161,080 TOTAL 332,244 147,391 591,872 84,997 433,447 204,065 1,794,017 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 TO
FROM Southwest
Central 64.2% 3.6% 13.9% 0.9% 8.4% 9.0% 100%
Hemet/San Jacinto 10.2% 72.2% 3.0% 2.9% 5.5% 6.2% 100%
Northwest 5.7% 0.3% 73.2% 0.3% 1.1% 19.5% 100%
Pass Area 4.8% 4.6% 3.7% 66.9% 0.6% 19.5% 100%
Southwest 6.6% 1.9% 3.9% 0.2% 79.8% 7.5% 100%
* Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT I-5 - 2045 PM Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
EXHIBIT I-4 - 2045 PM Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
TO
FROM Southwest
Central 313,691 17,511 64,577 3,948 39,446 41,718 480,890 Hemet/San Jacinto 21,579 162,035 5,659 6,318 10,987 11,533 218,110 Northwest 43,461 1,848 565,759 1,528 7,406 160,552 780,554 Pass Area 6,068 6,269 4,125 91,253 631 24,354 132,700
Southwest 40,442 11,861 22,506 1,132 508,327 40,698 624,964 Outside WRCOG 25,307 5,301 145,054 16,534 23,061 215,257 TOTAL 450,546 204,825 807,679 120,712 589,859 278,854 2,452,475 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 TO
FROM Southwest
Central 65.2% 3.6% 13.4% 0.8% 8.2% 8.7% 100%
Hemet/San Jacinto 9.9% 74.3% 2.6% 2.9% 5.0% 5.3% 100%
Northwest 5.6% 0.2% 72.5% 0.2% 0.9% 20.6% 100%
Pass Area 4.6% 4.7% 3.1% 68.8% 0.5% 18.4% 100%
Southwest 6.5% 1.9% 3.6% 0.2% 81.3% 6.5% 100%
* Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 Table I-7 - 2045 Off-Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
EXHIBIT I-6 - 2045 Off-Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
TO
FROM Southwest
Central 731,298 40,985 154,356 10,249 94,547 99,276 1,130,712 Hemet/San Jacinto 50,980 371,040 14,306 14,750 27,068 29,611 507,755 Northwest 102,039 4,532 1,308,993 4,215 18,439 356,593 1,794,811 Pass Area 14,136 13,855 10,239 201,638 1,539 56,688 298,095 Southwest 96,254 28,093 55,358 3,108 1,175,582 103,410 1,461,804 Outside WRCOG 59,214 12,874 337,766 41,024 56,927 507,806 TOTAL 1,053,921 471,379 1,881,018 274,984 1,374,103 645,578 5,700,982 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 TO
FROM Southwest
Central 64.7% 3.6% 13.7% 0.9% 8.4% 8.8% 100%
Hemet/San Jacinto 10.0% 73.1% 2.8% 2.9% 5.3% 5.8% 100%
Northwest 5.7% 0.3% 72.9% 0.2% 1.0% 19.9% 100%
Pass Area 4.7% 4.6% 3.4% 67.6% 0.5% 19.0% 100%
Southwest 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.2% 80.4% 7.1% 100%
* Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No-Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT I-9 - 2045 Percent Daily Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL
EXHIBIT I-8 - 2045 Daily Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone*
Central
Hemet/San
Jacinto Northwest Pass Area
Outside

WRCOG TOTAL

WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 J-1
Appendix J - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Purpose

On September 27, 2013, California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 743 into law, fundamentally changing the way that transportation impacts are to be assessed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The new law requires CEQA guidelines to be amended to provide an alternative to Level of Service for evaluating transportation impacts. The intent of the change is to introduce alternate criteria that “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” (New Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1).) The primary effect of the new law is to establish the use of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred basis for measuring traffic impacts, in recognition of the fact that VMT more accurately reflects traffic impacts as it takes into account both the number of trips being made and the distance of those trips. Although CEQA and the specific provision of SB 743 do not generally apply directly to impact fee programs (which are governed by the provision of the Mitigation Fee Act), the reasoning behind SB 743 establishing VMT as the preferred basis for CEQA traffic impact measurement is sound and equally applicable for impact fee nexus determination.

Linking the TUMF to VMT does enable developers to continue to use TUMF participation as demonstration of partial mitigation for their cumulative regional transportation impacts under the new SB 743 requirements. Furthermore, consistent with SB 743, consideration of travel impacts in terms of peak period VMT more accurately reflects the realities of travel behavior as the basis for determining impacts on the regional transportation system by reflecting the peak demands on the system based on the number of trips and the cumulative distance these trips occupy facilities in the system.