Page - 1 -
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Study Session: 5:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
2. STUDY SESSION
A. MA24033 (GPA24001, TTM38972, CZ24001, & SDP24018) GRANITE HILL PROJECT – PROPOSAL FOR 130 SINGLE -FAMILY DETACHED
HOMES ON A 21.87 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT NORTH OF GRANITE
HILL DRIVE BETWEEN QUARTZ CANYON ROAD AND PYRITE
STREET (APNS: 169 -040-003, 173 -120-009, 173-120-011, 173 -120-013, 169 - 040-004, 169-040-005); (APPLICANT: RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC) A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.
B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.
C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.
D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
Page - 2 -
Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file a staff presentation on the Granite Hill Project and identify areas of concern and/or request for addition al information.
B. CITY BRANDING DESIGN
Presented by Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager
3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
4. INVOCATION
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
7. PRESENTATIONS
A. INTRODUCTION OF NEW FIRE BATTALION CHIEFS
8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
10. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. FEBRUARY 27, 2025 SPECIAL MEETING
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific it em until it appears on an agenda.
Page - 3 -
B. MARCH 6, 2025 REGULAR MEETING
12. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSENT
CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A
COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask questions or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-07
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2025-07, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADDING SECTIONS 9.05.103, 9.05.105 AND 9.05.108 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE ESTABLISHING AN APPLICATION PROCESS, ENTITLEMENT
PERIOD, AND APPEALS PROCESS FOR STREAMLINED,
MINISTERIAL HOUSING PROJECTS AND AN APPEALS PROCESS FOR
INCOMPLETENESS DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE PERMI T
STREAMLINING ACT, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
C. APPROVAL OF FINANCE TRACT MAP NO. 38947; VERNOLA RANCH
FOR FINANCE AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES ONLY LOCATED EAST
OF INTERSTATE 15 (I-15), WEST OF PATS RA NCH ROAD, SOUTH OF
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE, AND NORTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Finance Map (Tract Map No. 38947) for Finance and Conveyance purposes only.
Page - 4 -
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Finance Tract Map No. 38947.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreement and accept the surety bond for Monumentation.
D. APPROVE POSITIONS, PURCHASES AND BUDGET AMENDMENTS
FOR A FOOD TRUCK AND STREET VENDOR ENFORCEMENT
PROGRAM
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve two (2) Full-Time Code Enforcement Officer I (CEO) positions for the Food Truck and Street Vendor Enforcement Program (Program) in Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 at an estimated cost of $37,000;
2. Purchase two pick-up trucks with added equipment at an estimated cost of $120,000;
3. Purchase equipment and supplies to establish preventative measures at an estimated cost of $20,000;
4. Approve the FY 2024-25 budget appropriation of $120,000 for the trucks in the Equipment/Vehicle Fund #730.
5. Approve the FY 2024-25 budget appropriation of $177,000 in the General Fund (GF) #100 for:
a. CEO positions - $37,000; and
b. Preventative Measures Equipment and Supplies - $20,000. c. Transfer to Equipment/Vehicle Fund #730 - $120,000.
E. APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE FORD MAVERICK HY BRID
REPLACEMENT VEHICLE
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of one (1) Ford Maverick Hybrid replacement vehicle for $30,323.73, including taxes and fees.
2. That the City Council authorize the Finance Director to make any necessary budget adjustments.
Page - 5 -
F. AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THE FY24 TECHNOLOGY AND
EQUIPMENT PROGRAM GRANT FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE
Requested Action: That the City Council accept grant funds from the U.S.
Department of Justice-FY24 Technology and Equipment Program Grant.
13. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
14. PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. APPOINTMENT OF CITY DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE
2025 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
(SCAG) ANNUAL REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
Requested Action: That the City Council select a Delegate and Alternate for the 2025 SCAG Regional Conference and General Assembly, May 1 -2 at the JW Marriott in Palm Desert.
16. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR BRIAN BERKSON
1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2025
2. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWE ST TRANSPORTATION NO W
COALITION MEETING OF MARCH 13, 2025
3. UPDATE ON THE METROL INK / SOUTHERN CALIF ORNIA
REGIONAL RAI L AUTHORITY – AUDIT AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2025
4. UPDATE ON THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTIO N
REDUCTION REVIEW COM MITTEE MEETING OF MA RCH 20,
2025
B. MAYOR PRO TEM CHRIS BARAJAS
1. UPDATE ON THE CALCOG MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2025
Page - 6 -
2. UPDATE ON THE CONTRACT CITIES LEGISLATIVE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2025
3. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS - ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2025
C. COUNCIL MEMBER GUILLERMO SILVA
1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHW EST MOSQUITO AND VECTOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2025
17. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
20. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of April 3, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332-6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.
Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.
P
age | 1
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2025
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.A
ST
UDY SESSION: MA24033 (GPA24001, TTM38972, CZ24001, &
SDP24018) GRANITE HILL PROJECT – PROPOSAL FOR 130
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON A 21.87 -ACRE SITE
LOCATED AT NORTH OF GRANITE HILL DRIVE BETWEEN
QUARTZ CANYON ROAD AND PYRITE STREET ( APNS: 169-040-
003, 173-120-009, 173-120-011, 173-120-013, 169-040-004, 169-040- 005); (APPLICANT: RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC)
RE
COMMENDATION
1. That the City Council receive and file a staff presentation on the Granit e Hill Project and identify areas of concern and/or request for additional information.
STUDY SESSION PROCESS
This agenda item is an opportunity for an introduction of the proposed project to the City Council to receive feedback. The City Council will not take any action on the proposed project. Each City Councilmember will have an opportunity to communicate to the applicant any issues that should be addressed prior to the item being reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a future public hearing.
PROJECT
The Applicant (“Applicant” or “Riverside Legacy IV, LLC”) proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to construct a residential community consisting of 130 single -family dwellings on a 21.87-acre vacant land located north of Granite Hill Drive, between Quartz Canyon Road and Pyrite Street . The proposed density is 5.9 dwelling units per acre.
Exhibit No. 1 presents the Project site with land use designation of Highest Density Residential (HHDR).
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
EXHIBIT NO. 1 - PROJECT SITE LAND USE
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
A Planned Unit Development ( PUD) provides zoning flexibility to encourage unique site planning and design in exchange for a higher -quality development. Unlike conventional zoning, a PUD allows modifications to standards like setbacks and lot sizes, enabling creative layouts and mixed- use developm ents that better integrate with their surroundings.
To be approved for a PUD zone, the project must incorporate mandatory findings, ensuring consistency with the General Plan, compatibility with neighboring uses, and adequate infrastructure. This approach balances flexibility for developers with community benefits, fostering well -designed projects that enhance urba n character and public spaces. The project must incorporate at least five of the following features:
1. Residential clustering that will provide new neighborhoods combined with abundant open space.
2. Preservation of abundant natural open space.
3. The project will provide a substantial public amenity, for example, a significant public plaza, a public park, trails or a similar improved open space feature,
Page | 3
including provisions for guaranteed long-term maintenance not at the expense of the city.
4. The project includes s ignificant environmental benefits, such as preservation, enhancement and/or creation of a significant natural feature or open spaces with a minimum area of one-half (½) acre.
5. Additional public benefits and project amenities that advance the city's identified objectives and evolving visions as identified in the General Plan and Community Plans.
6. The project will achieve greater energy efficiency than standard developments through the incorporation of green building techniques, scoring at least a silver rating on the LEED or other equivalent rating system, or achieving a minimum of thirty (30) percent greater energy efficiency than the minimum required by California Code of Regulations Title 24.
7. The project provides for a significant saving of water usage over the life of the project.
8. Stormwater runoff controls.
In addition to the above mandatory project features, the project must meet the following special PUD findings:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific and Community Plans;
2. The project complies with all applicable provisions of this chapter, except for those provisions modified by the PUD rezoning;
3. The approved modifications to the development standards of these Zoning Regulations are necessary and appropriate to accom modate the density and superior design of the proposed project;
4. The proposal would benefit the area surrounding the project to a greater degree than development allowed within the underlying zoning district(s), including improved pedestrian or transit access to jobs, goods and services;
5. The proposal would provide mixed land use and/or site design flexibilities while enhancing site or building aesthetics to achieve an overall, workable, higher quality of development than would otherwise be possible under conventional zoning standards;
6. The project is compatible in use, size and type of structure, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout, with adjoining land uses, mitigates environmental impacts and can be integrated into the neighborhood;
7. The project complies with all applicable City Design Guidelines and provides adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage, as necessary;
8. The project does not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects on surrounding areas;
9. All affected public facilities, services and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed project; and
10. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use, or detrimental or injurious to Page | 4
property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.
Requested Entitlements
On February 2, 2024, the applicant submitted form al entitlement applications for the proposed Granite Hill Project . The requested entitlements include a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Tentative Tract Map, and Site Development Permit:
• General Plan Amendment – A land use designation change from Highest Density Residential (HHDR) to Medium -High Density Residential (MHDR) to accommodate a density of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre. • Change of Zone – A zoning change from General Residential (R -3) to Planned Unit Development (PUD).
• Tentative Tract Map – A subdivision of six parcels into 130 lots for single- family detached homes and open space.
• Site Development Permit – For the conceptual site, architectural, and landscape plans for 130 single family detached units.
PROJECT DESIGN
The proposed Granit e Hill project encompasses 21.87 acres and includes 130 single- family detached residential units, with a density of 5.94 dwelling units per acre. See Exhibit No. 2 Site Plan for the proposed site plan. The project consists of detached, two- story single-family homes, offering three-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom floor plans ranging from 1,551 to 1,757 square feet. To provide architectural diversity and maintain a cohesive community aesthetic, the homes are proposed to feature three distinct elevation styles— Spanish, Ranch, and Craftsman—with each style incorporating three color and material variations.
EXHIBIT NO. 2 - SITE PLAN
Page | 5
The development includes a total of 412 parking spaces for residents and visitors. Each unit would have two assigned parking spaces, totaling 260 spaces , while 152 guest parking spaces will be distributed throughout the community. The parking layout is designed to facilitate efficient traffic circulation while maintaining accessibility for residents and visitors. Pedestrian pathways and sidewalks will connect residential areas to shared community spaces, promoting walkability within the development.
Each unit is proposed to include 115 square feet of private open space, while the development provides 39,316.83 square feet of common open space for shared recreational use. The common open space areas would include landscaped gathering spaces, pedestrian walkways, and other passive recreational features.
Architectural Elevations
The Granite Hill project features a variety of architectural elevations including Spanish, Ranch, and Craftsman designs. Each elevation type incorporates unique façade treatments, materials, and color schemes to create a visually cohesive and diverse streetscape. The Spanish elevations highlight stucco exteriors, dec orative wrought iron details, and traditional tile roofing. The Ranch elevations emphasize horizontal lines with board-and-batten siding and rustic stone or brick accents. Meanwhile, the Craftsman elevations showcase intricate wood detailing, tapered columns, and a mix of stucco and siding for a more handcrafted aesthetic. These elevation designs aim to enhance the architectural character of the development while ensuring compatibility with the surrounding community.
EXHIBIT NO. 2 - ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
Page | 6
Recreation areas and Amenities
Amenities and recreation include 39,316.83 square feet of common open space areas .
The Central Recreation Area (13,035.40 sq. ft.) featuring a real turf area for both passive and active use, park bench seating, a shade structure with a BBQ counter and decorative wall, and table seating for outdoor dining. It also includes a tot -lot pla y area with a rubberized surface, an earthscape play structure, bench seating, and a fire pit seating area with lounge seating, fostering both relaxation and social interaction. Additionally, the area provides short-term bike parking to encourage alternative transportation.
EXHIBIT NO. 4 - RECREATION AREA, CENTRAL
The northeast recreation area (9,013.91 sq. ft.) includes adirondack seating in a decomposed granite area, picnic tables, a decomposed granite walking path, and a real lawn area for passive recreation. The northwest recreation area (8,232.47 sq. ft.) includes a wood shade structure, patio- style seating with a real lawn, trash receptacles, bench seating, and a dog bag station, making it a welcoming space for both residents and their pets.
EXHIBIT NO. 5 - RECREATION AREAS, NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST
Another Recreation Area (9,035.04 sq. ft.) is specifically designed as a dog-friendly zone, featuring a real lawn dog run, bench seating, multiple dog bag stations, and trash receptacles to ensure cleanliness and convenience for pet owners.
Page | 7
EXHIBIT NO. 6 - RECREATION AREA, DOG PARK
The project frontage and vehicular entries incorporate entry monuments with project signage, enhanced vehicular paving, a multi-purpose trail, and a horse trail fence, adding to the aesthetic appeal and accessibility of the development.
EXHIBIT NO. 7 - OUTDOOR AMENITIES
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
On April 11, 2024, the project was reviewed by the Residential Development Committee (RDC). At that time, the Granite Hill PUD was proposed as a 165- unit residential project on 22.08 acres, with 78 single-family homes and 87 townhomes. The plan included a 50- foot landscaped berm, a 14- foot equestrian trail, and three small open spaces with
Page | 8
playgrounds and a dog run. Concerns were raised about limited usable open space, insufficient recreational amenities, and architectural quality.
Key issues discussed included preserving commercial frontage, the usability of sloped land, lack of guest parking, and inadequate setbacks that raised fire and usability concerns. Architectural improvements were recommended, including better articulation, varied setbacks, and enhanced landscaping. Additional suggestions included expanding amenities, ensuring multi-purpose trails, and preventing repetitive home designs. Since the RDC meeting, the project has undergone significant revisions to address these concerns, resulting in substantial design changes. A following up meeting to introduce the new design with the RDC will occur in the near future.
CORE ISSUES
Housing Element and No Net Loss
The project site is identified as a potential housing site in the 6th Cycle Housing Element.
On May 2, 2024, the City Council redesignated the site to Highest Density Residential (HHDR) and rezoned it to R-3 (General Residential). This designation allows for a density of 2 0–25 dwelling units per acre, with a minimum capacity of 438 residential units.
However, the project proposes a reduced density of 130 single-family units at 5.9 dwelling units per acre, leaving 308 unactualized units.
This reduction triggers the No Net Loss provision under state law, resulting in a market- rate housing project below the densities identified in the Housing Element. If approved as proposed, the City will need to determine whether there is sufficient surplus to account for the unactualized uni ts or identify additional sites within 180 days to maintain compliance with RHNA requirements and ensure sufficient lower -income housing capacity.
The City’s RHNA Allocations
The City actively monitors RHNA progress, and as of December 2024, there is a surplus of 2,534 units beyond the 4,497-unit requirement . Surpluses exist across all income categories, including 1,210 Extremely/Very Low -Income units, 577 Low -Income units, and 589 Moderate-Income units, while Above Moderate- Income units exceed RHNA by 158.
This surplus is driven by planned and rezoned developments, such as the Vernola Ranch Specific Plan (1,576 units), Rio Vista Specific Plan (1,697 units), and 6th Cycle Rezone efforts (997 units) . With a total housing capacity of 7,031 units , the City is exceeding RHNA targets and will continue to monitor and adjust as needed to maintain compliance.
Page | 9
EXHIBIT NO. 8 - RHNA CALCULATOR, DECEMBER 2024
No Net Loss Law requires jurisdictions to maintain adequate housing capacity across all income levels. If a property is downzoned, reducing capacity, the City may utilize surplus units to offset the loss, provided RHNA obligations remain met. If the surplus is insufficient, additional sites may need to be identified and rezoned to ensure compliance.
As development progresses, RHNA capacity may fluctuate, and the Planning Division will continue to monitor housing needs and No Net Loss Law requirements, adjusting as necessary to maintain adequate capacity.
DISCUSSION TOPICS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION
The following are discussion topics for the Planning Commission to consider:
1. Project Design Change
a. The project design has been revised from the initial proposal of 165 residential units (including 78 single-family homes and 87 townhomes ) to 130 single- family homes , resulting in a reduction in density from 7.47 DU/acre to 5.94 DU/acre.
b. The revised density requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation.
2. No Net Loss and RHNA Compliance
a. The site is currently designated as Highest Density Residential (HHDR), allowing 20–25 DU/acre and accommodating up to 438 units . The revised project results in 308 fewer units than originally anticipated, requiring consideration of RHNA surplus capacity and compliance with No Net Loss provisions.
ATTACHMENT 1
Proposed Project Plans (Conceptual Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan)
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
A-19
A-20
A-21
Conceptual Site Plan
4-Pack Typical Plotting
6-Pack Typical Plotting
Plan 1 (1544) - Front Elevations
Plan 1A (1544) - Floor Plan
Plan 1A (1544) - Spanish Elevations
Plan 1A (1544) - Spanish Enhanced Elevations
Plan 1B (1544) - Ranch Elevations
Plan 1B (1544) - Ranch Enhanced Elevations
Plan 1C (1544) - Craftsman Elevations
Plan 1C (1544) - Craftsman Enhanced Elevations
Plan 1 (1544) - Roof Plans
Plan 2 (1558) - Front Elevations
Plan 2A (1558) - Floor Plan
Plan 2A (1558) - Spanish Elevations
Plan 2A (1558) - Spanish Enhanced Elevations
Plan 2B (1558) - Ranch Elevations
Plan 2B (1558) - Ranch Enhanced Elevations
Plan 2C (1558) - Craftsman Elevations
Plan 2C (1558) - Craftsman Enhanced Elevations
Plan 2 (1558) - Roof Plans
Plan 3 (1757) - Front Elevations
Plan 3A (1757) - Floor Plan
Plan 3A (1757) - Spanish Elevations
Plan 3A (1757) - Spanish Enhanced Elevations
Plan 3B (1757) - Ranch Elevations
Plan 3B (1757) - Ranch Enhanced Elevations
Plan 3C (1757) - Craftsman Elevations
Plan 3C (1757) - Craftsman Enhanced Elevations
Plan 3 (1757) - Roof Plans
Written Color Schemes
Color Boards - “A“ Spanish
Color Boards - “B“ Ranch
Color Boards - “C“ Craftsman
A-22
A-23
A-24
A-25
A-26
A-27
A-28
A-29
A-30
A-31
A-32
A-33
A-34
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
#23036
Developer: Riverside Legacy IV, LLC
5550 Newbury Street, Suite B
Baltimore, MD 21209
Contact: Trygg Danforth
Business: (617) 877-7637
[email protected]
Contact: Jeff Addison
Business: (949) 660-1587
www.klcarch.com
Architect: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave. Suite 110
Irvine, CA 92614
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
1 3
7 8
4 11 6
5 5
5 5
3 8
9 8
44 84
4 12
1 NO
PARKING
VAN
RECREATIONAL AREA
13,035.40 sq.ft.
BASIN A
BASIN B
RECREATIONAL AREA
9,013.91 sq.ft.
RECREATIONAL AREA
8,232.47 sq.ft.
REC AREA
9,035.04 sq.ft.
GRANITE HILL DRIVE
24'8'5'5' 5'5'
52' ROW
7' 7'
24'3.5' 3.5'
24'8'8' 6'6'
32'
24'3.5' 19'
32'
5'5'
5'5'
52' ROW
168.1'
30'
20'
78'
34.1'
32.9'
26.5'
64.9'
64.9'
36'
73.9'
10' 10'
30'
22'
9'
36.7'
24'19' 3.5'
9'
24' 19' 5'19'5'
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building,
and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading
information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final
design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines
to building foundation lines.
Area: 21.87 Ac
Total Homes: 130 Units
Density: 5.94 DU/AC
6LWH6XPPDU\
#Units
39 43
48 130
%
30 33
37 100
Plan
1 2
3 Type
3 BR/ 2.5 BA
3 BR/ 2.5 BA
3 BR/ 2.5 BA
Sq.Ft.
1,551
1,566
1,757
0 25
50N
Required Parking
2 Spaces/Unit: 260 parking spaces
Provided Parking
Assigned Parking: 260
Guest Parking: 62 (9'x19' Head-in)
90 (8'x22' Parallel)
152 Total Guest Parking
Total Provided Parking: 412 (3.2:1)
Required Private Open Space
115 sq.ft./Unit: 14,950 sq.ft.
Provided Private Open Space
109,420 sq.ft.
Required Common Open Space
150 sq.ft./Unit: 19,500 sq.ft.
Provided Common Open Space
39,316.83 sq.ft.
#Units
39 43
48 130
Total O.S.
18,427.50
36,872.50
54,120.00
109,420.00
Plan
1 2
3 O.S. Sq.Ft.
472.50
857.50
1,127.50
Location Map
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-1
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-2
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-3
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024 Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
B - RANCH
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
A - SPANISH
C - CRAFTSMAN
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-4
AREA TABULATION
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 1
M. BEDRM.
15'-3"x14'-6"
LINEN
BEDRM. 2
10'-9"x10'-0"
BEDRM. 3
10'-10"x10'-0"
BATH 2
HALL
LAU.
M. BATH
W.I.C.
14'-7" L.F.
PORCH
ENTRY
KITCHEN
PWDR.
DINING
GREAT RM.
17'-0"x16'-0"
GARAGE
20'-1"x20'-4"
38'-0"
29'-6"
3'-6" 13'-0" 21'-6"
20'-11" 7'-7" 1'-0"
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-5
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-6
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-7
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-9
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-10
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-11
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-12
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024 Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
B - RANCH
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
A - SPANISH
C - CRAFTSMAN
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-13
AREA TABULATION
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 2
M. BEDRM.
13'-1"x13'-10"
LINEN
BEDRM. 2
9'-11"x10'-1"
BEDRM. 3
10'-4"x10'-1"
BATH 2
HALL
LAU.
M. BATH
W.I.C.
12'-11" L.F.
LINEN
PORCH
ENTRY
KITCHEN
PWDR.
DINING
7'-11"x16'-0"
GREAT RM.
11'-5"x13'-9"
GARAGE
20'-1"x21'-1"
28'-6"
38'-0"
39'-0"
1'-0"
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-14
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-15
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-16
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-17
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-18
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-19
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-20
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-21
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024 Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
B - RANCH
Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsC Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.2024
A - SPANISH
C - CRAFTSMAN
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-22
AREA TABULATION
UNCONDITIONED SPACE
CONDITIONED SPACE
PLAN 3
LINEN
HALL
LAU.
PRIM. BATH
W.I.C.
18'-8" L.F.
LINEN
BATH 2
9'-4"6'-9" x
FLEX
10'-1"10'-4" x
BEDRM. 2
10'-1"11'-10"x
BEDRM. 3
12'-7"13'-10"x
PRIM. SUITE
15'-4"11'-0" x
GREAT RM.
20'-1"20'-1" x
GARAGE
PORCH
KITCHEN
PANTRY
16'-11"8'-10" x
DINING
FOYER
9'-9" L.F.
PWDR.
3'-6"
38'-0"
1'-0"
20'-8" 11'-4"
33'-6"
32'-0"
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-23
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-24
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-25
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-26
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-27
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-28
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-29
JOB #: 23036
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
024 8
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-30
WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES
JOB # 23036
CREATED 12/14/23
Elevation Rev 5/21/24
"A" ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3
STUCCO 1628 1625 1605
STUCCO PAINT MATCH * SW6155 RICE GRAIN SW7536 BITTERSWT STEM SW9173 SHIITAKE
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
SW7743
MOUNTAIN ROAD
SW6097
STURDY BROWN
SW7026
GRIFFIN
FRONT DOOR/
SHUTTERS
SW9129
JADE DRAGON
SW0006
TOILE RED
SW7625
MOUNT ETNA
GABLE END DETAIL SW6061
TANBARK
SW6061
TANBARK
SW6061
TANBARK
WROUGHT IRON SW7675
SEALSKIN
SW7675
SEALSKIN
SW7675
SEALSKIN
ROOF: LOW PROFILE "S"
VILLA
1VICS0141
BUCKSKIN
1VICS7970
RED CASTLE
1VICS3940
CLIFFSIDE
"B" ELEVATIONS
RANCH SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6
STUCCO 1529 1554 1547
STUCCO PAINT MATCH * SW7517 RIVER'S EDGE SW7638 JOGGING PATH SW7689 ROWHOUSE TAN
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
SW7566
WESTHIGHLAND WT
SW7566
WESTHIGHLAND WT
SW7554
STEAMED MILK STUCCO: OMEGA
LAP SIDING /
CORNER BOARDS
SW9133
JASPER STONE
SW6141
SOFTER TAN
SW7522
MEADOWLARK
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SW6074
SPALDING GRAY
SW7743
MOUNTAIN ROAD
SW7740
MESSENGER BAG ROOF: NEWPOINT
FRONT DOOR SW6047
HOT COCOA
SW7617
MEDITERRANEAN
SW0044
HUBBARD SQUASH
BRICK /
STONE: ELDORADO
ROOF: FLAT SLATE 1FECY0300
BRONZE PEARL BLD
1FACS1430
CHARCOAL BLEND
1FACS0141
BUCKSKIN
BRICK: TUNDRA LATIGO ASHLAND RIVERBED
GROUT: MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE
"C" ELEVATIONS
CRAFTSMAN SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
STUCCO 1547 1587 1598
STUCCO PAINT MATCH * SW6121 WHOLE WHEAT SW7507 STONE LION SW9171 FELTED WOOL FASCIA / TRIM SW7541
GRECIAN IVORY
SW7035
AESTHETIC WHITE
SW6070
HERON PLUME
BOARD & BATTEN SIDING /
GARAGE DOOR
SW6159
HIGH TEA
SW6047
HOT COCOA
SW7047
PORPOISE
FRONT DOOR SW7068
GRIZZLE GRAY
SW7048
URBANE BRONZE
SW7048
URBANE BRONZE
ROOF: FLAT SHAKE 1FBCJ0198
DUNES TAN
1FBCJ1132
CHARCOAL BRWN BLD
1FBCJ4070
SEA PEARL BLD
STONE: FIELDLEDGE PADOVA MESETA ANDANTE
GROUT: MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE
$//)/$6+,1**877(56'2:1632876(7&72%(3$,17('7200$7&+$'-$&(17685)$&($//3$,17%5($.672%(&87$7,16,'(&251(56
)253+2726+23 5(1'(5,1*385326(621/<'212786(,17+() ,(/' 72'$6/$67$3$-817$6&$³$/(5$6&$³$/21(6(7&6(5$13,17$'26 3$5$,,*8$/$5$/$683(5),&,('(-8172 72'$6/$65(67$85$6'(3,1785$6(&257$5$1(1/$6(648,1$6,17( 5,25(6
62/23$5$),1(6'(3+2726+23<5(35(6(17$&,21(61286$5(1( /&$032
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-31
COLOR BOARDS - “A“ SPANISH
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
SPANISH
SCHEME #1
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
GABLE END DETAIL
WROUGHT IRON
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
SPANISH
SCHEME #2
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
GABLE END DETAIL
WROUGHT IRON
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
SPANISH
SCHEME #3
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
GABLE END DETAIL
WROUGHT IRON
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-32
COLOR BOARDS - “B“ RANCH
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA D
#23036
RANCH
SCHEME #4
MAY 21, 2024DEC. 14, 2023DEC. 14, 2023MAY 21, 2024
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
LAP SIDING /
CORNER BOARDS
BRICK
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA D
#23036
RANCH
SCHEME #5
MAY 21, 2024DEC. 14, 2023DEC. 14, 2023MAY 21, 2024
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
LAP SIDING /
CORNER BOARDS
BRICK
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA D
#23036
RANCH
SCHEME #6
MAY 21, 2024DEC. 14, 2023DEC. 14, 2023MAY 21, 2024
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING
FASCIA / TRIM /
GARAGE DOOR
LAP SIDING /
CORNER BOARDS
BRICK
FRONT DOOR
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-33
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
CRAFTSMAN
SCHEME #7
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING /
GARAGE DOOR
STONE
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
CRAFTSMAN
SCHEME #8
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING /
GARAGE DOOR
STONE
GRANITE HIL L
JURUPA, CA DEC. 14, 2023
#23036
CRAFTSMAN
SCHEME #9
CONCRETE ROOF
STUCCO BODY
FRONT DOOR /
SHUTTERS
FASCIA / TRIM
BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING /
GARAGE DOOR
STONE
COLOR BOARDS - “C“ CRAFTSMAN
#23036
GRANITE HILL
JURUPA, CA
RIVERSIDE LEGACY IV, LLC.
12/17/2024
A-34
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.A
-1-
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
February 27, 2025
The meeting was held at Rubidoux High School – Elliott Duchon Concert Hall, 4250 Opal Street, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR SPECIAL MEETING ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Brian Berkson called the Special Meeting to order at 6:13 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Lt. John Shulda, Riverside County Sheriff’s Department.
3. PRESENTATION BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ON PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUTOFFS AND S CE INVESTMENTS IN JU RUPA VALLEY’S
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
A presentation was provided from Southern California Edison on emergency response operations, electrical infrastructure upgrades, emergency preparedness, customer notifications and informational resources. The fol lowing representatives from Southern California Edison responded to questions from the Public.
Aileen Flores, Government Relations Manager
Luis Lara, Customer Engagement Advisor
Cameron McPherson, Principal Manager, Emergency Operations Jao Faram, Senior Engineering Manager, Desert Distribution Engineering Jennifer Ocampo, Senior Advisor
A. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
The following members of the public appeared before City Council and voiced opposition to the insufficient response received from Southern California Edison during the 8-day electrical power shut-off:
Catalina Rosales
Wendy Lomeli
Nanette Seda-Lotzgesell
Bernard Murphy
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
Laura Shultz
Zoe Hanlon
Nathan Hanlon
David Daneshmayeh
Maria Lara
Mary Vidales
Daniel Silvas
Mirna Torres
George Revilla
Gabriela Marquez
B. CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
Following discussion, the City Council directed City Staff to work collaboratively with Southern California Edison to lessen the impacts on residents who are affected by service interruptions, including providing advanced notice of service outages, providing additional resources, and claims assistance.
4. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Counc il, Mayor Brian Berkson adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held March 6, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Yvette Rodriguez
Deputy City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.B
-1-
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
March 6, 2025
The meeting was held at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA
1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Brian Berkson called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas was absent.
2. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Kermit Perry, 3Ps Christian Ministries.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Guillermo Silva.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva , seconded by Council Member Veronica Sanchez, to approve the Agenda, with the removal of Item 10.E, at the request of City staff.
Ayes: B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: C. Barajas
5. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES –
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
“Nana”, a 3-year old female Pit Bull was introduced to the Council. Anyone interested in giving Nana a home is encouraged to contact the City’s Animal Control Services Department at https://www.rcdas.org.
Mayor Brian Berkson asked City Manager Rod Butler to follow-up on a future pet vaccination clinic with Riverside County Animal Control Services.
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
B. JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UPDATE
Don Malloy, President of the Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce gave an update on their recent activities and events.
C. HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY UPDATE
Mayra Mixco - Chavez, Director Community Health, Equity & Wellness, gave a quarterly update on the Healthy Jurupa Valley Initiative.
6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Kim Jarrell Johnson speaking as a private citizen stated that at the last Council meeting, Council Mem ber Armando Carmona denigrated former Council Member Leslie Altamirano by calling her a “cancer.” She stated this is just one example where he used his “bully pulpit” on the Council dais to try and intim idate people. She read aloud a poem written during WWII by a Lutheran minister about speaking out and asked that the City Council stop being silent on their colleague’s actions.
Dr. Veronica Contreras express ed concern regarding the ongoing pattern of “hostility, intimidation, and unethical behavior” displayed by Council Member Armando Carmona.
Dr. Contreras stated that Mr. Carmona recently made remarks referring to former Council Member Leslie Altamirano as a “cancer” despite knowing that her child is currently battling cancer and that she lost her father to the disease. She stated that this type of behavior is divisive, misogynistic and a blatant attempt to silence critics. (Mark Johnson donated his time to her).
Dr. Doug Herbert voiced concern regarding the following issues: 1) illegal parking on 34th Street and 36 th Street; 2) graffiti on Pyrite ; 3) school gates that are kept locked ; 4) the Jurupa Road Grade Separation Project; and 5) illegal vendors on Opal Street.
Dr. Irene Sanchez Diaz stated that she has known Council Member Armando Carmona for more than 20 years. She addressed various concerning actions by Council Member Armando Carmona and added that Jurupa Valley needs leaders that are honest that unites rather divides and leaders that serve the people – not themselves.
Paula Avey, Communications Director for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints introduced the Ontario Inter -faith Council that represents many different faiths and cultures. She offered their services and guidance as they hope to start an Inter-faith Council in Jurupa Valley. She conveyed an invitation to their upcoming service fair this summ er where local non -profits who are in need of resources may benefit from the Inter -faith Council.
Jesse Silva encouraged the Council to work in harmony for the betterment of the community.
-3-
David Daneshmayeh thanked City Manager Rod Butler and his team for putting together the Town Hall meeting with Southern California Edison as it was a very beneficial meeting.
He expressed appreciation to Council Member Armando Carmona and Co uncil Member Veronica Sanchez for t heir help to residents during the recent power outages. He encouraged residents to show less divisiveness and more unity.
Daniel Silvas responded to some of the earlier comments, stating that Council Member Armando Carmona deeply cares about the community of Jurupa Valley. He congratulated Veronica Sanchez and Guillermo “Willy” Silva on their recent election to the City Council.
Santiago Moran thanked the City Council for their support of his food fest event. He plans to do additional events in the future.
Veronica Hurtado addressed some of the previous speakers stating that Council Member Armando Carmona has done much for the community. She encouraged everyone to work together regardless of their political affiliations.
Robert Ramirez stated that he will work with anyone with a level head regardless of their political affiliation. He spoke in support of Council Member Carmona’s efforts to clean up the community, stating that Council Member Carmona is responsive to the community’s concerns.
7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona announced that local 6 -year old resident Ruben Vasquez, Jr. is heartbroken after his pony was stolen from his family’s yard. Anyone with any inform ation about the theft is encouraged to contact the Jurupa Valley Sheriff’s Department. He congratulated Santiago Moran on his recent food truck fest, which was very successful. He gave an update on the recent cleanup effort at the Mary Tyo Equestrian Staging Area. The next cleanup event is scheduled for April 5, 2025. He announced a new park is in the planning stages on 58 th Street by Serendipity and Steve Street. He thanked Colby Diuguid for his leadership and the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District for their responsiveness. He thanked everyone who came out to the Code Enforcement Workshop.
8. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Rod Butler announced the Community Development Department will host a community meeting to solicit input for the tr ail placement in the Crestmore Heights neighborhood on Tuesday, March 11 at 6:00 p.m. at the Eddie Dee Smith Senior Center.
Spanish interpreters will be available. He announced the next Code Enforcement Workshop will be held Wednesday, March 19 at 6:0 0 p.m. at City Hall . These meetings are intended to provide an opportunity to meet with Planning staff and get helpful resources. The Community Development Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, March 13 at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The Committee will finalize their funding recommendations for the City’s public service grants. The meeting is open to the public.
-4-
9. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. FEBRUARY 20, 2025 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting of February 20, 2025.
Ayes: B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: C. Barajas
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSENT
CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A
COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask question s or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,919,795.19
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated January 30, and February 10, 18, 21, 2025 as well as the payroll registers dated January 31, and February 14, 2025.
-5-
C. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-05
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No, 2025-05, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2024 -008 (PUBLIC SAFETY,
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL
TAX THEREIN
D. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF 2025 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Legislative Platform for the calendar year of 2025.
E. APPROVAL OF FINANCE TRACT MAP NO. 38947 ; VERNOLA RANCH
FOR FINANCE AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES ONLY LOCATED EAST
OF INTERSTATE 15 (I-15), WEST OF PATS RA NCH ROAD, SOUTH OF BELLEGRAVE AVENUE, A ND NORTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE –
REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF
F. APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 37857; LAS PALMAS LOCATED NORTH OF 45 TH STREET BETWEEN OPAL STREET AND PACIFIC AVENUE,
ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
1. Requested Action: That the City Council a pprove Tract Map 37857 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street, public utility and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (Majesty Lane), Lot “B” (La Brisa Street), Lot “C” (Areca Lane), Lot “D” (El Granate Street), and Lots “E” through “L”.
b. Accept the dedication for Lot “37” for basin and water quality purposes.
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 37857.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and
-6-
4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related improvements and survey monumentation.
G. RESOLUTION DENYING T HE WARMINGTON RESIDE NTIAL
PROJECT LOCATED AT 7 586 JURUPA ROAD (MA2 3357);
(APPLICANT: WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL)
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-26, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY DENYING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 CONSISTING
OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888, SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. 23172, AND DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION NO. 24001 THAT SOUGHT TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF 6.92 ACRES OF
LAND INTO 72 LOTS FOR 67 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183-030-014), AND MAKING A FINDING THE
PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT
TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SECTION 15270
SINCE THE PROJECT IS BEING DENIED (WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
H. COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR AB 1600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the annual compliance report for Development Impact Fees.
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona , to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 10.E, which was removed from the Agenda.
Ayes: B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: C. Barajas
11. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
12. PUBLIC HEARING
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR MASTER
APPLICATION NO. 25018 (MA25018) ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 25002 (ZCA25002) CONSISTING OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING
SECTIONS 9.05.103, 9.05.105, AND 9.05.108 TO THE JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING AN APPLICATION PROCESS,
ENTITLEMENT PERIOD, AND APPEAL PROCESS FOR
-7-
STREAMLINED, MINISTERIAL HOUSING PROJECTS AND APPEALS
PROCESS FOR INCOMPLETENESS DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE
PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT, AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA
Staff Report presented by Roberto Gonzalez, Principal Planner. Mr. Gonzalez reported that California mandates streamlined approvals for certain housing projects. The current Municipal Code lacks an appeal process for these decisions.
The proposed ordinance will create a formal application process for streamlined, ministerial housing projects and will create an appeals proces s for decisions on streamlined housing projects and development applications that are deemed incomplete.
Further discussion followed.
Joe Perez, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
Mayor Brian Berkson opened the public hearing.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Veronica Sanchez, to introduce Ordinance No. 2025-07, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADDING SECTIONS 9.05.103, 9.05.105 AND 9.05.108 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE ESTABLISHING AN APPLICATION PROCESS, ENTITLEMENT
PERIOD, AND APPEALS PROCESS FOR STREAMLINED,
MINISTERIAL HOUSING PROJECTS AND AN APPEALS PROCESS
FOR INCOMPLETENESS DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE PERMIT
STREAMLINING ACT, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Ayes: B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: C. Barajas
13. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. AGREEMENT WITH UNLIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INC., FOR THE
ABATEMENT AND DEMOLITION OF THE DILAPIDATED BUILDING
AT 6631 CLAY STREET
-8-
Staff Report presented by Joe Perez, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director. Mr. Perez reported that the site is the home of the former Sizzler restaurant. The building has been in severe decline since it closed in 2020.
It has a history of general decline, major structural incidents, and two fires. In May 2024, a judgement was obtained from a third -party hearing officer declaring the building a public nuisance. A lien will be placed on the property to ensure recovery of any associated costs.
Further discussion followed.
City Attorney Peter Thorson clarified how the lien will allow the City to recover any associated costs.
A motion was made by Guillermo Silva , seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona, to authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement with Unlimited Environmental, Inc. for the demolition of the dilapidated building located at 6631 Clay Street, which poses a hazard to public safety and is in violation of local building codes; and allocate funding for the demolition and any associated cos ts, ensuring that the amount does not exceed $89,000 dollars for the safe removal of the structure.
Ayes: B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: None
Absent: C. Barajas
14. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR BRIAN BERKSON
1. Mayor Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission meetings of February 20 and 21, 2025.
2. Mayor Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors meeting of February 27, 2025.
3. Mayor Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority Board of Directors meeting of February 28, 2025.
4. Mayor Brian Berkson gave an update on the Southern California Association of Governments - Transportation Policy Committee meeting of March 6, 2025.
-9-
15. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Due to a n outbreak of avian influenza that killed millions of egg -laying hens, Council Member Armando Carmona reques ted that an emergency ordinance be brought back to allow residents to have backyard chickens to encourage residential egg farming.
16. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.
17. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona thanked everyone for coming out tonight and for getting involved. He provided a statement about growing up in Jurupa Valley , his time abroad, his work history, and activism in favor of immigrant communities. He stated that sometimes he “shoots from the hip and says things that he shouldn’t say”, but at the end of the day the example that he tries to set is done by work. He invited members of the community to help him give back to the community by joining his efforts to clean up the city. He stated that he welcomes different opinions and different points of view.
Council Member Veronica Sanchez gave an update on District 4. She reassured residents that she has read all of the ir emails regarding the Shadow Rock community. She has set up a Town Hall at the Rubidoux Library on Wednesday, March 12 from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. The Town Hall will provide code enforcement updates and how the City plans to address residents’ concerns regarding homelessness, crime and mail theft. She encouraged residents to use the My Jurupa Valley mobile app. to report any issues and to visit the City’s various social media sites to stay informed . She announced a District 4 cleanup event on Saturday, March 22. She encouraged residents to be cordial to one another and to contact her with any questions or concerns. She dedicated tonight’s meeting to her Uncle Art Sanchez and her father, Jose Sanchez.
18. ADJOURNED IN MEMORY
Mayor Brian Berkson adjourned the meeting in memory of Art Sanchez and Jose Sanchez.
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Brian Berkson adjourned the meeting at 9:17 p.m. to March 20, 2025 at 7:00 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.B
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY ADDING SECTIONS 9.05.103,
9.05.105 AND 9.05.108 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND
ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING AN APPLICATION PROCE SS,
ENTITLEMENT PERIOD , AND APPEALS PROCESS FOR
STREAMLINED, MINISTE RIAL HOUSING PROJECT S
AND AN APPEALS PROCESS FOR INCOMPLETENESS
DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE PERMIT
STREAMLINING ACT , AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings.
A. New State laws require streamlined ministerial review of housing development projects on the basis of objective standards . These project s must be approved without a public hearing, discretionary findings, or review by the Planning Commission or City Council. The City’s Municipal C ode does not includ e a process to accept and process these applications and an entitlement period for these projects. In addition, the Municipal Code does not include a process to appeal (1) an approval or den ial of a hous ing project, or (2) a determination made by the Community Development D irector or staff that an application for a development project is incomplete as required by Govenrment Code Section 65943.
B. On January 16, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2025-02, an urgency ordinance establishing an appeals process for streamlined ministerial review housing development projects, and for incompleteness determinations under the Permit Streamlining Act.
Section 2. Code Amendment. A new Section 9.03.105 is hereby added to Chapter
9.05 (Land Use Ordinance) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
“Sec. 9.05.103 Application p rocess and e ntitlement period for streamlined , ministerial housing projects.
A. Applicability. This section shall apply to a ny housing development project that must be approved ministerially pursuant to State law. For purposes of this section, ministerial approval means a project that is approved by staff on the basis of objective standards and is not subject to a public hearing before the Planning Commission or City Council.
B. Applications. Any housing development project that must be approved ministerially pursuant to State law shall apply for an Administrative Use Permit.
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
1. Applications for consideration of a n Administrative Use Permit shall be made to the Community Development Director on the forms provided by the Planning Division, shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established by fee resolution of the City Council and shall include such information and documents as may be required by the Planning Division checklist for the particular application, in addition to the following:
(a) Name and address of the applicant and all persons that own any part of the property, including evidence that all owners agree to the application. (b) Location or address, and legal description of property. (c) A site plan, drawn to scale, that shows the following:
i. Boundary and dimensions of property.
ii. Topography of the property.
iii. Location of adjacent streets, drainage structures, utilities, buildings, signs, and other features that may affect the use of the property.
iv. Proposed development, including planned buildings and structures, access, drainage, yards, drives, parking areas, landscaping, signs and walls or fences.
v. Dimensioned elevat ions, including details of proposed materials for elevations.
2. Action on Administrative Use Permits.
(a) The Community Development Director shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove an Adminstrative Use P ermit based upon the standards set forth in State law for approval or disapproval of the project and within the time period specified by State law and shall give notice of the decision, including any required conditions of approval, by mail, to the applicant and any other persons requesting notice.
3. Approval period.
(a) Unless otherwise specified by State law, a ny Administrative Use Permit that is approved shall remain valid and be used within two (2) years from the effective date thereof, or within such additional time as may be s pecified in the conditions of approval, which shall not exceed a total of five (5) years for the entitlement ; otherwise, the Administrative Use Permit shall be null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a n Administrative Use Permit is required to be used within less than five (5) years, the applicant or his/her successor -in-interest may, prior to its expiration, request up to three, one year extensions of time in which to use the Administrative Use Permit. A request for extension of time shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Division and shall be filed with the Community Development Director, accompanied by the fee established by resolution of the City Council. Within thirty (30) days following the filing
-3-
of a request for an extension, it shall be considered by the Community Development Director. An extension of time may be granted upon a determination that valid reason exists for the applicant or his/her successor-in-interest not using the Administrative Use Permit within the required period of time. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the Administrative Use Permit shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the issuance of the Administrative Use Permit. The term “use” shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under the terms of the authorized use.”
Section 3. Code Amendment. A new Section 9. 05.105 is hereby added to Chapter
9.05 (Land Use Ordinance) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
“Sec. 9.05.105 Appeals process for streamlined, ministerial housing projects A. Applicability. This section shall apply to a ny housing development project that must be approved ministerially pursuant to State law . For purposes of this section, ministerial approval means a project that is approved by staff on the basis of objective standards and is not subject to a public hearing before the Planning Commission or City Council.
B. Appeals to Planning Commission . Any person seeking to appeal the decision of the Community Development Director to either app rove or deny a housing development project that is subject to ministerial review, may appeal such decision by filing an appeal with the City Clerk within 15 calendar days of the date of the written notice of the decision. The appeal shall be made on the f orms provided by the Planning Division and shall be accompanied by the applicable filing fee as set forth by resolution. Upon receipt of a completed appeal form, the City Clerk shall set the matter of the appeal for hearing before the Planning Commission not less than fifteen (15) nor more than sixty (60) days thereafter and shall give written notice of the hearing to the applicant, appellant. and the Community Development Director. The Planning Commission shall hear the appeal de novo. The Planning Commission shall render its decision within thirty (30) days following the close of the appeal hearing.
C. Appeals to City Council . An appeal of the Planning Commission decision to the City Council shall be filed and processed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 9.05.100.
An appeal may be filed by the applicant, owner of the property subject to the application, a person who presented oral or written comments to the Planning Commission, or any other interested person. An appeal may also be filed by an individual Council Member or by the City Council, provided, however, that any such appeal shall be solely on the basis that the issues related to the application are important to the city and should be decided by the entire City Council, and , provided further, that an appeal by an individual Council Member or the Council shall not mean, nor shall it be construed to mean, that the individual Council Member or the City Council is expressing a view in favor of or in opposition to the application .” Section 4. Code Amendment. A new Section 9.05.108 is hereby added to Chapter
9.05 (Land Use Ordinance) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
-4-
“Sec. 9.05.108 Appeals process for incompleteness determinat ions under the Permit Streamlining Act.
A. Applicability. This section shall apply to any development project that is subject to California Government Code Section 65920 (the Permit Streamlining Act).
B. An applicant for a development project that is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act may appeal staff’s determination that the zoning application is incomplete.
C. The appeal shall be in writing and shall state the facts and basis for the appeal, and the relief or action sought, and shall be accompanied by the required fee.
D. The appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 15 calendar days of the date of the written determination that the application is incomplete.
E. The appeal shall be heard by the City Council no later than sixty days after the filing of the appeal.
F. After receiving an appeal from the determination that the application is incomplete, and following a public hearing, the City Council, whose decision is final, by the affirmative vote of a majority of its voting members, shall determine whether the application is complete or incomplete. In order to determine that an application is incomplete, the City Council must make all of the following findings:
(1) The item or items identified as incomplete by the city were included in the city's submittal requirement checklist.
(2) The city provided the applicant with a notice of the incomplete item or items within thirty calendar days after the city received the applicant's application. (3) The notice specified those parts of the application that were incomplete and indicated the manner in which they could be made complete, including a list and thorough description of the specific information needed to complete the application. (4) The applicant resubmitted the application.
(5) The materials provided by the applicant with the resubmitted application did not include information identified and described in the notice of incompleteness.
G. The city shall provide the applicant a written notice of the City Council’s decision following the hearing and before the expiration of the sixty-day period for hearing the appeal.”
Section 5. Repeal of Urgency Ordinance. The City Council does hereby repeal Ordinance No. 2025-02 so that it has no further effect upon the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 6. CEQA. The City Council finds that the Ordinance does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because there is no potential that that it will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because it has no potential for either a direct physical change to the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The City Council further finds that even if the Ordinance is a project under CEQA that it falls within the “common sense” CEQA exemption set forth in CE QA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” Adoption of the
-5-
Ordinance does not allow for the approval or disapproval of any development in the City. Instead, it merely creates a process to accept and process applications, an entitlement period and an appeals process by which streamlined housing development projects and incompleteness determinations for development projects may be appealed.
Section 7. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this O rdinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more secti on(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation.
Section 8. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published and posted in the manner required by law.
Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.
PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the Ci ty of Jurupa Valley on this 20th day of March, 2025.
______________________________
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-6-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025-07 was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 6th day of March, 2025, and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of March, 2025 it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 20th day of March, 2025.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
P
age | 1
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2025
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.C
APPRO
VAL OF FINANCE TRACT MAP NO. 38947; VERNOLA RANCH
FOR FINANCE AND CONV EYANCE PURPOSES ONLY LOCATED
EAST OF INTERSTATE 1 5 (I -15), WEST OF PA TS RANCH ROAD,
SOUTH OF BELLEGRAVE AVENUE, AND NORTH OF LIMONITE
AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approving the F inance Map ( Tract Map No. 38947) for Finance and Conveyance purposes only.
2. A
uthorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Finance Tract Map No. 38947.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreement and accept the surety bond for Monumentation.
BACKGROUND
On December 21, 2023, the City Council approved the Vernola Ranch Specific Plan under Master Application No. 22153 along with t he Tentative Tract Map (TTM38504). The specific plan granted approvals for the development of up to 1,576 residential dwelling units, recreational areas, a network of trails and parks, an internal street network, open spaces, landscaping, and street improvements. Furthermore, an overlay, designated within the Specific Plan, was approved for a potential school site situated at the northeast portion of the Specific Plan Area, constituting the "Project." On June 25, 2024, the Planning Commission approved Financ e Tract Map No. 38947.
The applicant has requested to record Finance Map (No. 38947) (Exhibit #1) prior to the Final Map for the project as described above. The approval and recordation of Finance
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
Map No. 38947 would allow the applicant to arrange for any title transfer and secure financing for the project. The finance map does not establish legal building boundaries or permit the applicant to construct any improvements set within the boundaries of the project. The applicant will still be required to submit the final map for the previously approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM38504) prior to permit issuance as defined by the City’s Municipal Code Title 7.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City Municipal Code Title 7, Tract Maps require City Council action for approval, denial, or modifications. Staff recommend that the City Council approve Finance Tract Map No. 38947 and accept the offers of dedication, the subdivision agreements, and bonds.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of this financing map does not have any financial impact to the city.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.
2. Provide alternate direction to staff.
**********************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************
TRACT MAP NO. 38947
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 WEBBNWESTRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 WEBBNWESTRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 TRACT MAP NO. 38947WEBBNWESSEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 8ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 8TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 9
SEE SHEET 7
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
SEE SHEET 8
SEE SHEET 10TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
SEE SHEET 9
SEE SHEET 11TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 WEBBNWES SEE SHEET 10
SEE SHEET 12TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
SEE SHEET 11
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 WEBBNWESTRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024 WEBBNWESTRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
WEBBNWES
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
SEE SHEET 18
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024WEBBNWES TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
SEE BELOW
SEE ABOVEWEBBNWES
TRACT MAP NO. 38947ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS JULY, 2024
WEBBNWES
1 AGREEMENT
FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SURVEY MONUMENTS
TRACT MAP 38947
This agreement, made and entered into as of March 20, 2025 by and between the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, State of California hereinafter called City and Lennar Homes of California, a Limited Liability Company hereinafter called Subdivider.
WITNESSETH:
FIRST: Subdivider, for and in consideration of the approval by City of the final map of that certain land division known as Final Tract 38947 hereby agrees, at Subdivider's own cost and expense, to furnish all labor, equipment and materials necessary to set, within 24 months from the date this agreement is executed, in a good and workmanlike manner, all survey monuments and tie points and to fu rnish to the City Engineer tie notes for said tract in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 7.20, including Section 7.20.100, of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and Section 8771 et seq. of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California.
Subdivider further agrees to pay, within 30 days of presentation to Subdivider of the final billing of any surveyor or engineer for work performed by him as provides for in Article 9 of Chapter 4, Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 66495). Subdivider further agrees that if payment to the surveyor or engineer is not made within 30 days and the surveyor or engineer notifies City Engineer that he has not been paid for setting the final mo numents, the City Council is authorized pursuant to Section 66497 of the Government Code, after providing Subdivider with an opportunity to present evidence as to whether or not the surveyor or engineer has been paid, to order that payment be made by City to the engineer or surveyor. If this occurs, the Subdivider shall, upon demand made by the City Engineer, and without proof of loss by City, reimburse City for any funds so expended.
Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, the determination of City as to whether the surveyor or engineer has been paid shall be conclusive on Subdivider, its surety, and all parties who may have an interest in the agreement or any portion thereof.All of the above required work shall be done under the inspection of, and to the satisfaction of, the City Engineer, and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as complete by the City Engineer. The estimated cost of said work and improvements is the sum of Monument Bond Amount Seventeen Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty dollars ($17,760).
SECOND: Subdivider agrees to pay to City the actual cost of such inspections of the work and improvements as may be required by the City Engineer. Subdivider further agrees that, if suit is brought upon this agreement or any bond guaranteeing the completion of the monuments, all costs and reasonable expenses and fees incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligations shall be paid by Subdivider, including reasonable attorney's fees, and that, upon entry of judgment, all such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
THIRD: City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee of City, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the works specified in this agreement prior to the completion and acceptance thereof, nor shall City or any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the nature of the work, or by reason of the acts or omissions of Subdivider, its agents or employees, in the performance of the work, and all or said liabilities are assumed by Subdivider. Subdivider agrees to protect, defend, and 2 hold harmless City and the officers and employees thereof from all loss, liability or claim because of, or arising out of the acts or omissions of Subdivider, its agents and employees, in the performance of this agreement or arising out of the use of any patent or patented article in the performance of this agreement.
FOURTH: The Subdivider hereby grants to City, the Surety upon any bond, and to the agents, employees and contractors of either of them, the irrevocable permission to enter upon the lands of the subject land division for the purpose of completing the monumentation. This permission shall terminate in the event that Subdivider or the Surety has completed work within the tim e specified or any extension thereof granted by the City. It is further agreed that Subdivider shall have control of the ground reserved for the installation of said work, and the streets in which they are to be placed, as is necessary to allow Subdivider to carry out this agreement.
FIFTH: Subdivider agrees to file with City prior to the date this contract is executed, an acceptable and sufficient improvement security in an amount not less than the estimated cost of the work, as above specified, for the faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement, and for the payment of the amount of the improvement security to the City for the benefit of any surveyor or engineer who has not been paid by the Subdivider, as provided for by Section 66495 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California. Subdivider agrees to renew each and every said bond or bonds with good and sufficient sureties or increase the amount of said bonds, or both, within ten (10) days after being notified by the City Engineer that the sureties or amounts are in sufficient. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, if Subdivider fails to take such action as is necessary to comply with said notice, Subdivider shall be in default of this agreement unless all required improvements are completed within ninety (90) days of the date on which the City Engineer notified Subdivider of the insufficiency of the security or the amount of the bonds or both.
SIXTH: If Subdivider neglects, refuses, or fails to prosecute the work as to insure its completion within the time specifies, or within such extensions of time which have been granted by City, or if Subdivider violates, neglects, refuses, or fails to perform satisfactorily any of the provisions of the plans and specifications, Subdivider shall be in default of this agreement. City shall have the power, on recommendation of the City Engineer, to terminate all rights of Subdivider in such agreement, but said termination shall not affect or terminate any of the rights of City as against Subdivider or its Surety then existing or which thereafter accrue because of such default. The determination of the City Engineer of the question as to whether any of the terms of the agreement or specifications have been violated, or have not been performed satisfactorily, shall be conclusive upon the Subdivider, its Surety, and any and all parties who may have any interest in the agreement or any portion thereof. The foregoing provisions of this section shall be in addition to all other rights and remedies available to City under law. The failure of the Subdivider to commence construction shall not relieve the Subdivider or surety from completion of the improvements required by this agreement.
SEVENTH: It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, including the surety or sureties on the bonds securing this agreement, that, in the event it is deemed necessary to extend the time of completion of the work contemplated to be done under this agreement, extensions of time may be granted, from time to time, by City, either at its own optio n, or upon request of Subdivider, and such extensions shall in no way affect the validity of this agreement or release the surety or sureties on such bonds. Subdivider further agrees to maintain the aforesaid bond or bonds in full force and effect during the terms of this agreement, including any extensions of time as may be granted therein.
3 EIGHTH: It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that if any part, term or provision of this agreement is by the courts held to be unlawful and void, the vali dity of the remaining portions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the agreement did not contain that particular part, term or provision held to be invalid.
NINTH: Any notice or notices required or permitted to be given pursuant to this agreement shall be served on the other party by mail, postage prepaid, at the following addresses:
City Subdivider
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Ave
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Lennar Homes of California LLC
4140 Temescal Canyon Rd Ste 410
Corona CA 92883
TENTH: General.
A. Authority to Execute this Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party and has the authority to bind that party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
B. Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
C. Applicable Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be deemed to have b een entered into and shall, in all respects, be interpreted, construed, enforced and governed by and under the laws of the State of California. The venue of any legal action relating to this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of California or U.S. D istrict Court, as applicable, with jurisdiction over the County of Riverside.
D. Legal Responsibilities. The Subdivider shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal Laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The Subdivider shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall not be liable a t law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Subdivider to comply with this subsection.
E. Independent Advice of Legal Counsel. Each party acknowledges that it had retained independent legal counsel of its own choice to review this Agreement and that prior to the execution hereof each party has had the opportunity to review the terms of this Agreement with its counsel and is entering into this Agreement after such review.
F. Validity of Agreement. All parties agree that this Agreement is legal, valid and binding
G. Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, assigns, executors and administrators.
4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly approved and executed on behalf of the parties as of the date first written above.
SUBDIVIDER
____________________________________
Name:
President
_____________________________________
Name:
Secretary
FOR A CORPORATIONS: SIGNATURE OF PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF CORPORATION OR
A DULY AUTHORIZED CORPORATE RESOLUTION SHOWING AUTHORITY OF PERSONS TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION IS REQUIRED.
FOR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS AND SIMILAR LEGAL ENTITIES: A DULY
AUTHORIZED RESOLUTION OF THE BUSINESS ENTITY OR OTHER DULY AUTHORIZED
DOCUMENT SHOWING AUTHORITY OF PERSONS TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION
TWO ORIGINALS OF AGREEMENT ARE REQUIRED; SIGNATURES OF SUBDIVIDER MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY A NOTARY PUBLIC.
5 “CITY”
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a Municipal corporation
________________________________________
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Vicki Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED:
________________________________________
Paul Toor
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM
________________________________________
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Original: 7/1/11
Revised: 2/23/22
21-0128
October 23, 2024
City of Jurupa Valley
Attention: Joel Jimenez
8930 Limonite Ave
Jurupa Valley, CA, 92509
RE: Tract Map No. 38947
City of Jurupa Valley
MONUMENT BOND ESTIMATE
Gentlemen:
This letter advises that the estimated fee for the monumentation of Tract Map No. 38947, based upon the placement of 74 monuments at $240.00 per monument, to be $17,760 for said Tract Map.
If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me at (951) 686- 1070.
Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Michael E. Johnson, P.L.S.
Director of Land Survey & Mapping
Page | 1
cr120
ST
AFF REPORT
D
ATE: M ARCH 20, 2025
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: SUSAN PARAGAS, FINANCE DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.D
AP
PROVE POSITIONS, PURCHASES AND BUDGET AMENDMENTS
FOR A FOOD TRUCK AND STREET VENDOR ENFORCEMENT
PROGRAM
RE
COMMENDATION
T
he City Council (Council) is recommended to approve:
1. Two (2) Full-Time Code Enforcement Officer I (CEO) positions for the Food Truck and Street Vendor Enforcement Program (Program) in Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 (FY2425) at an estimated cost of $37,000;
2. Purchase of 2 pick -up trucks with added equipment at an estimated cost of $120,000;
3. P
urchase of equipment and supplies to establish preventative measures at an estimated cost of $20,000;
4. F
Y2425 budget appropriation of $120,000 for the trucks in the Equipment/Vehicle Fund #730.
5. F
Y2425 budget appropriation of $177,000 in the General Fund (GF) #100 for:
a. CE
O positions - $37,000; and
b. P
reventative Measures Equipment and Supplies - $20,000.
c. T
ransfer to Equipment/Vehicle Fund #730 - $120,000.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
BACKGROUND
1. On February 20, 2025, a study session on the Program was presented to Council.
2. Council directed staff to move forward with the Program.
ANALYSIS
During the study session, Council was presented with an estimated budget to develop and implement a food truck and street vendor enforcement program . It consisted of the following:
• 2 Full-Time Code Enforcement (CE) Officers
• 2 Pick-Up Trucks with Lift Gates
• Equipment and Supplies for Preventative Measures
• 1 Dedicated Sheriff’s Deputy
The first year’s cost was presented at $773,200 with the second year’s cost to be between $223,000 and $633,200. However, to initiate the program immediately, it is recommended that the City hire the 2 CEOs in FY 2024-25 and approve a General Fund (GF) budget appropriation for salaries and benefits in the amount $37,000 which covers 2 months of the current fiscal year, May to June 2025. This will allow for a training period before the program is fully implemented.
Additionally, for preventative measures, equipment and supplies such as bollards, rail ties, fencing, etc. will need to be purchased in order to deter and discourage vendors from assembling in unsafe areas. The cost is estimated at $20,000.
Two fully-equipped pick-up trucks will need to be purchased for use by the new CEOs at an estimated cost of $120,000. Each truck will need to be outfitted with equipment such as a lift gate, light bar, spotlight, etc. The purchase will be directly charged to the City’s internal services fund, Equipment/Vehicle Fund #720 but funded by the GF.
The program’s estimated budget for next fiscal year, FY 2025- 2026, will be included in the annual budget process comprising of:
a) Annual Salaries and Benefits of 2 CE Officers - $223,000; and b) Annual Cost of Dedicated Sheriff’s Deputy - $410,200.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Should Council approve the recommended budget appropriations, t he total financial impact in FY2425 is estimated at $177,000 to the GF and $120,000 to the Equipment/Vehicles Fund in the following accounts:
1. $37,000 in GF, Account#100.1240.5xxxx – Various Salary and Benefits accounts for Code Compliance;
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2025
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.E
A
PPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE (1 ) FORD MAVERICK HYBRID
REPLACEMENT VEHICLE
RE
COMMENDATION
1) I
t is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of one (1) Ford Maverick Hybrid replacement vehicle for $30,323.73, including taxes and fees.
2) That the City Council authorize the Finance Director to make any necessary budget adjustments.
B
ACKGROUND
T
he City maintains a fleet comprising thirty -six (36) vehicles, including passenger vehicles, light-duty pickup trucks, and service trucks. Nearly a quarter of these vehicles are over eight years old, with some nearing the end of their operational lifespan. Over the last two years, the City has been actively working to replace older units with newer, more fuel-efficient models. The latest additions to the fleet w ere approved on February 20, 2025, for the replacement of two public works inspector trucks.
AN
ALYSIS
A
s the City continues to grow, additional vehicles are necessary to support operational efficiency and ensure uninterrupted service delivery. Improving the City’s fleet will help maintain productivity and prevent disruptions in daily tasks. In particular, the Building Division within the Community and Economic Development Department frequently conducts field inspections and site visits. Replacing vehicles that have reached the end of their useful life with newer, more fuel -efficient models will enhance reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and support the Division’s ability to meet service demands effectively.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
City staff solicited proposals from three (3) local dealerships listed as follows:
Dealer Location Price
Sunrise Ford Fontana, CA $30,323.73
Fritts Ford Riverside, CA $30,367.91
Citrus Motors Ontario, CA $31,514.74
As part of fleet maintenance efficiency, the City is working to standardize its fleet with Ford and Toyota vehicles. Ford and Toyota are known for their reliability , affordable fuel costs, and minimal repair costs.
Of the proposals received, the proposal submitted by Sunrise Ford is just and reasonable; therefore, staff is recommending the purchase of one (1) 2025 Ford Maverick Hybrid from Sunrise Ford in Fontana. The Maverick meets all of the requirements of the City at a competitive price relative to the other quotes obtained. Sunrise Ford is a reputable dealership in the local market from which the City has purchased multiple vehicles, including a service truck in 2023.
City sta ff is continuing to explore other potential funding sources for future vehicle purchases.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total cost of the one (1) 2025 Ford Maverick Hybrid including tax is $30,323.73. There is $140,000.00 available in ISF Equipment and Vehicles account number 730.7300.62720. If approved, there will be a remaining balance of $80,095.48 in the ISF Equipment and Vehicles account, which may be used for future eligible purchases.
ALTERNATIVES
1. N ot approve the vehicle purchase
2. Provide alternative direction
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2025
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.F
A
UTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT THE FY24 TECHNOLOGY AND
EQUIPMENT PROGRAM GRANT FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE
RECOMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council accept grant funds from the U.S. Department of Justice- FY24 Technology and Equipment Program Grant
B
ACKGROUND
T
o accept these funds from Congress man Takano’s Office, the City Council is required to formally take action as outlined in this staff report.
T
he FY24 Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office Technology and Equipment Program (TEP) provides grants to state, local, Tribal, territorial, and other entities to develop and acquire effective equipment, technologies, and interoperable communications that assist in responding to and preventing crime.
O
n September 9, 2024, the COPS office announced approval of the City of Jurupa Valley grant application in the amount of $150,000 for the purchase an d installation of Illegal Dumping Cameras and related equipment. The period of performance end date for the grant is 03/31/2026.
AN
ALYSIS
Staff will prepare a Request for Proposals to solicit responses for the purchase of the cameras. It is anticipated that this program will accomplish the following:
• R
educe dumping in disadvantaged areas
• Free up crucial Sheriff and Code Enforcement time for higher priority calls • Reduction of trash in storm drains, creeks and rivers
RETURN TO AGENDA
• Improve neighborhood aesthetics
• Improve sense of place and increase property values
This item is placed before the City Council for budgeting purposes only. The grant does not require adoption of a City Council resolution.
The grant approval allows the City to purchase and install the equipment. Once the equipment has been installed staff will submit the required reporting documentation and request reimbursement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City will receive $150,000 from the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. No local matching funds were required or proposed as part of this grant.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Provide alternative direction to staff
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *********************
Page | 2
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
APPOINTMENT OF CITY DELEGATE FOR THE 2025 SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) ANNUAL
REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council select a Delegate and Alternate for the SCAG General Assembly meeting on Thursday, May 1 - Friday, May 2, 2025 at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort in Palm Desert, California.
BACKGROUND
The Southern California Association of Governments, founded in 1965, is a Joint Powers Authority under California state law, established as an association of local governments and agencies that voluntary convene as a forum to address regional issues. Under federal law, SCAG is designated as a Metropolitan Planning Organization and under state law as a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Council of Governments. SCAG develops long-range regional transportation plans as well as housing needs allocations and a portion of the South Coast Air Quality management plans.
SCAG is governed by delegates from every member city, county, and County Transportation Commission (CTC) through the General Assembly, which annually brings together the official representatives of SCAG’s membership and helps sets the agency’s course for the coming year.
ANALYSIS
In their capacity as an Assembly Delegate, the appointee will have the opportunity to consider and vote on policy matters presented at the General Assembly in the form of a Resolution and proposed revisions to the SCAG Bylaws. Both the Delegate and Alternate can attend, but only the Delegate can vote. If the delegate is not present, the Alternate may vote in the Delegate’s absence.
RETURN TO AGENDA