CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 6:00 PM
Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Avenue, Kerman, CA 93630
1. OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Welcome – Mayor
B. Call to Order
C. Roll Call
D. Invocation
At this time the Council wishes to provide anyone an opportunity to give a brief invocation or inspirational thought. In accordance with law, we would request this opportunity not be used to recruit converts, to advance anyone, or to disparage any other faith or belief. If no one steps forward, we will observe a moment of silence so that we may all focus our thoughts on how best to serve our community.
E. Pledge of Allegiance
2. AGENDA APPROVAL/ ADDITIONS/ DELETIONS
To accommodate members of the public or convenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed.
3. PRESENTATIONS/ CEREMONIAL MATTERS
A. Recognition of Kerman High School Mariachi De Leon (TJ) B. Introduction of Ruth Belmonte, Code Enforcement Official (JAJ) C. Economic Development Corporation Update (JAJ)
4. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for members of the public to address the Council on items of interest that are not on the Agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council.
Speakers shall be limited to three minutes. It is requested that no comments be made during this period on items on the Agenda. Members of the public wishing to address the Council on items on the Agenda should notify the Mayor when that Agenda item is called, and the Mayor will recognize your discussion at that time. It should be noted that the Council is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters discussed that are not on the Agenda. Speakers are asked to please use the microphone, and provide their name and address.
1 5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.
A. SUBJECT: Minutes - April 12, 2023 (MR)
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.
B. SUBJECT: Payroll (JA)
03/ 05/ 23 - 03/ 18/23: $ 184,223.89; Overtime: $ 8,830.63; Standby: $ 1,463.92; Comp Time Earned: 61.88
03/ 19/ 23 - 04/ 01/23: $ 183,026.48; Overtime: $14,834.19; Standby: $ 1,644.40; Comp Time Earned: 45.00
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.
C. SUBJECT: Warrants (JA)
1. Nos. 26477-26624 $155,271.42 ACH $82,040.07
RECOMMENDATION: Council approves warrants and electronic bank transfers as presented. (Pursuant to Government Code 37208)
D. SUBJECT: Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 (JJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution to initiate proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 and authorize the City Engineer to file his annual report.
E. SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services with Montoy Law Corporation (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution approving Amendment No. 2 Agreement for Legal Services with Montoy Law Corporation adjusting rates.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
2 7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. SUBJECT: Request for a Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) ABC License for Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) Located at 14195 W Whitesbridge Rd. (JRO)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion, review and consider adoption of a Resolution Adopting Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) ABC License for Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) Located at 14195 W Whitesbridge Rd.
Which Has Received a Conditional Use Permit by the City’s Planning Commission B. SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Stanislaus/ San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031) to Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez. (JJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution awarding the contract for the Stanislaus/ San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031), to Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez in the amount of $108,444.00 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.
C. SUBJECT: Consideration of Opposition to Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act as proposed by the California Business Roundtable (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution opposing Initiative No. 2-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act as proposed by the California Business Roundtable.
D. SUBJECT: Consideration of City’s position and possible Resolution regarding Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the Fresno County Transportation Agency and enact other project conditions (JAJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Consider Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the Fresno County Transportation Agency and impose wage and environmental review conditions on funded projects; and
2. Determine whether to adopt a position in support or opposition to the proposed bill; and
3. Adopt resolution accordingly that communicates the Council’s position to the bill’s author Assembly Arambula, the Assembly Committee on Local Government, Cal Cities and Fresno County Transportation Authority.
E. SUBJECT: Council Reassignments for Committees, Commissions and Boards (MR) RECOMMENDATION: Council discuss the reassignments and by minute order approve appointments.
3 F. SUBJECT: Presentation and discussion with possible direction of staff of Fiscal Year 23 -24 City Council Priorities, Goals and Staff Work Plan Alignment (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: City Councilreceive presentation by staff to identify and discuss proposed priorities, projects, goals and alignment of Departmental work plans pursuant to the approval and direction of the City Council for Fiscal Year 23-24.
8. CITY MANAGER/ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
9. MAYOR/ COUNCIL REPORTS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS This portion of the meeting is reserved for the Mayor and Councilmembers (i) to make brief reports on boards, committees, and other public agencies, and at public events, (ii) to request updates, (iii) to initiate future agenda items at the request of any one Council Member, and (iv) to take action on matters initiated under this section of the agenda. (Under this section the Council may take action only on items specifically agendized and which meet other requirements for action.)
10. CLOSED SESSION
None
11. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA MATERIALS: Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council within 72 hours of the meeting regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office located at 850 S. Madera Ave., Kerman, CA 93630 and on the City website at www.cityofkerman.net.
ADA Compliance and Reasonable Accommodation. The Council has adopted a Reasonable Accommodation Policy, which is available on the City website at www.cityofkerman.net or upon request by emailing the City Clerk at [email protected] or calling (559) 846-9380. The Policy provides a procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation to participate in this meeting. If you need assistance in order to attend this Council meeting or require auxiliary aids or services, e.g., hearing aids or signing services to make a presentation to the Council, please contact the City Clerk at (559) 846-9380 or email at [email protected] so such aids or services can be arranged. Accommodations should be requested as early as possible as additional time may be required in order to provide the requested accommodation. The meeting room is accessible to persons with physical disabilities.
AGENDA POSTING CERTIFICATION
I, Marci Reyes, City Clerk for the City of Kerman, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I caused the above agenda to be posted at City of Kerman Council Chambers at 850 S. Madera Ave., Kerman, CA 93630 and on the City website at www.cityofkerman.net.
Date: April 21, 2023 /s/ Marci Reyes, City Clerk
4 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, April 12, 2023 at 6:00 PM
Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Avenue, Kerman, CA 93630
1. OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Welcome – Mayor
B. Call to Order - 6:00 p.m.
C. Roll Call
PRESENT: Council Member Gary Yep, Mayor Pro Tem Bill Nijjer, Council Member Jennifer Coleman
ABSENT: Mayor Maria Pacheco, Council Member Ismael Herrera D. Invocation - Pastor Tom Boonstra, Kerman Baptist Church E. Pledge of Allegiance - Performed
2. AGENDA APPROVAL/ ADDITIONS/ DELETIONS
Motion made by Council Member Yep, Seconded by Council Member Coleman. Voting Yea:
Mayor Pro Tem Nijjer
3. PRESENTATIONS/ CEREMONIAL MATTERS - None
4. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - None
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion made by Council Member Yep, Seconded by Council Member Coleman. Voting Yea:
Mayor Pro Tem Nijjer
A. SUBJECT: Minutes - March 22, 2023
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.
B. SUBJECT: Payroll
02/ 19/ 23 - 03/ 04/23: $178,975.17; Retro Pay & Other: $1,665.41; Overtime: $5,052.77; Holiday at 1/2 Time: $1,476.65; Standby: $1,548.70; Comp Time Earned: 29.25 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.
5 Section 5, Item A.
C. SUBJECT: Warrants (JA)
1. Nos. 26320-26476 $791,955.55 ACH $79,668.19
RECOMMENDATION: Council approves warrants and electronic bank transfers as presented.
Pursuant to Government Code 37208)
D. SUBJECT: Monthly Investment Reports (JA)
RECOMMENDATION: Council accept monthly investment report as presented.
E. SUBJECT: Professional Services with PBK Architects for Community Safety Center/Police Station Feasibility Work (JAJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution approving a contract for professional services with PBK Architects for Community Safety Center/Police Station Feasibility Work in an amount not to exceed $30,000. Res 23-26
F. SUBJECT: New National Opioid Settlements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS JAJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion:
Affirm City Manager’sApproval ofSettlement Agreements andParticipation Forms forthe City’s participation in the National Opioid Settlement Agreements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS.
Affirm the City Manager’s Approval of the California State-Subdivision Agreements Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds relating to the National Opioid Settlement Agreements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS.
Adopt a Resolution (i) approving and authorizing the City Manager to carry out all necessary acts such that the City can participate in the National Opioid Settlements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS, including signing necessary documents and transmittal thereof as necessary and (ii) authorizing the City Manager to carry out all necessary acts such that the City can participate in the National Opioid Settlements, including, but not limited to, the transmittal of the executed documents in Recommendations 1 and 2 and all future settlements as necessary and applicable) through the National Opioid Settlements process. Res 23-29
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. SUBJECT: Resolutions required by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the City’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund Application forthe Sewer Collection System and Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project. (MB)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion to adopt the following:
6 Section 5, Item A.
1. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign and file a financial assistance application to the Clean Water State Revolving Fund for the design and construction of the Sanitary Sewer Collection System and Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project.
2. Resolution stating the City Council’s intention to be reimbursed for expenditures incurred ahead of the approval of the disbursement of Clean Water State Revolving Fund construction funds from the State Water Resources Control Board.
Motion made by Council Member Yep, Seconded by Council Member Coleman. Voting Yea:
Council Member Yep Res 23-27, Res 23-28
B. SUBJECT: Consideration of Pension Management Policy, Enrollment in CalPERS Pension PreFunding Program and Year One Payment to Manage CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liabilities (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution to:
1. Approve Pension Management Policy, and
2. Approve enrollment and payments to CalPERS Pension Pre-Funding Program to manage unfunded accrued CalPERS Pension Program Liabilities.
Motion made by Council Member Coleman, Seconded by Council Member Yep. Voting Yea:
Mayor Pro Tem Nijjer Res 23-30
8. CITY MANAGER/ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
A. Special Strategic Goal Setting Meeting, April 29, 2023
9. MAYOR/ COUNCIL REPORTS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
10. CLOSED SESSION - None
11. ADJOURNMENT – 6:22 p.m.
MINUTES CERTIFICATION
I, MARCI REYES, City Clerk for the City of Kerman, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above Minutes are a true depiction of all actions taken at the City Council meeting held on the first date above written at Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Ave, Kerman, CA.
Date: April 13, 2023
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
7 Section 5, Item A.
CITY OF KERMAN
PAYROLL REPORT
RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED
ADMINISTRATION
Alvarez, Josefina 3,748.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,748.31$ - Camacho, Josie 2,515.54$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,515.54$ -
Cheema, Akayla 2,356.62$ -$ 11.58 506.82$ - -$ - -$ 2,863.43$ - Gonzalez, Diana 3,553.84$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,553.84$ - Jansons, John 6,678.60$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 6,678.60$ -
Linares, Vanessa 1,566.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,566.15$ - Lopez, Jacqueline 2,221.08$ -$ 3.00 122.12$ - -$ - -$ 2,343.20$ - Mendoza Hernandez, Ariana 1,389.72$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,389.72$ 10.13 Mendoza, Gabriela 2,019.38$ -$ 3.00 110.78$ - -$ - -$ 2,130.16$ - Reyes, Marcia 3,669.51$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,669.51$ -
Sandoval, Veronica 1,494.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,494.15$ - TOTAL 31,212.90$ -$ 17.58 739.72$ - -$ - -$ 31,952.62$ 10.13
REC/SOCIAL
Acosta-Parra, Melany 100.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 100.75$ - Arredondo, Raquel 352.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 352.00$ -
Brar, Manreet 100.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 100.75$ -
Burdine-Slaven, Jeanna 2,248.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,248.62$ - Barrett, Shannon 1,678.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,678.15$ 2.25 Flores, Haley 1,678.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,678.15$ -
Garcia, Anthony 1,439.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,439.08$ - Hurlbert, Ronald 418.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 418.50$ -
Jauriqui, Jose 594.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 594.00$ -
Johnson, Theresa 3,186.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,186.62$ - Lujan, Vanessa 119.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 119.00$ -
Martinez, Aylah 596.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 596.75$ -
Martinez, Jeness 124.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 124.00$ -
Martinez Lopez, Jose 589.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 589.00$ - Negrete, Dean 1,586.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,586.31$ -
Pena, Mercedes 186.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 186.00$ -
Ruiz, Rosalba 495.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 495.00$ -
Salvador, Mark 2,922.72$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,922.72$ -
Sidhu, Nirmal 2,054.77$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,054.77$ -
Silva, Jessica 201.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 201.50$ -
Tovar, Jessica 341.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 341.00$ -
Villarreal, Arlene 2,028.04$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,028.04$ - TOTAL 23,040.70$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 23,040.70$ 2.25
POLICE
Antuna, Miguel 2,714.12$ -$ 10.00 484.66$ - -$ - -$ 3,198.79$ - Arciga, Jose 2,680.70$ -$ 29.50 1,466.79$ - -$ - -$ 4,147.49$ - Barbosa, Isaias 2,902.48$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,902.48$ - Barcoma, Wilbert 4,272.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 4,272.23$ - Barra, Brenden 2,070.80$ -$ 3.00 107.59$ - -$ - -$ 2,178.39$ - Belding, Jeff 3,578.45$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,578.45$ -
Castro, Jaclynn 2,031.42$ -$ 12.00 421.91$ - -$ - -$ 2,453.34$ - Chapman, Tom 3,435.42$ -$ 12.00 722.77$ - -$ - -$ 4,158.19$ - Clark, Patrick 2,382.12$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,382.12$ -
Coronado, Krystal 2,018.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,018.15$ - Corrales, Edith 857.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 857.50$ -
Cubillos, Theresa 2,764.38$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,764.38$ 9.75 Garcia, Andrew 2,067.69$ -$ 10.00 369.23$ - -$ - -$ 2,436.92$ - Gempis, Danzel 1,875.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,875.23$ -
Golden, John 5,005.20$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 5,005.20$ -
Gutierrez, Gloria 2,135.40$ -$ 5.11 200.75$ - -$ - -$ 2,336.15$ - Inthasone, Bryant 1,968.92$ -$ 14.00 492.23$ - -$ - -$ 2,461.15$ - Irazoqui, Mario 1,706.86$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,706.86$ - Levandusky, James 2,342.13$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,342.13$ - Lopez, Matt 850.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ 3.00 15.94$ 865.94$ -
Lozano, Daniel 1,521.20$ -$ 4.50 128.35$ - -$ - -$ 1,649.55$ - Lozano, Patricia 1,320.46$ -$ 1.00 24.76$ - -$ - -$ 1,345.22$ - Mendoza, Sandra 3,084.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,084.31$ - PAY PERIOD: March 05, 2023 - March 18, 2023
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY
8 Section 5, Item B.
CITY OF KERMAN
PAYROLL REPORT
RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED PAY PERIOD: March 05, 2023 - March 18, 2023
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY
Molina, Jesus 2,305.19$ -$ 4.00 162.87$ - -$ - -$ 2,468.06$ - Quintanilla, Rodolfo 2,080.65$ -$ - -$ - -$ 8.00 48.05$ 2,128.70$ - Rodrigues, Mary 2,257.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,257.69$ - Roth, Adriana 2,080.65$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,080.65$ -
Ruiz, Jose 1,984.61$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,984.61$ -
Vasquez, Francisco 1,947.11$ -$ 12.00 411.88$ - -$ - -$ 2,359.00$ - Velez, Bernice 1,645.36$ -$ 6.00 185.10$ - -$ - -$ 1,830.46$ - TOTAL: 72,119.17$ -$ 123.11$ 5,178.90$ -$ -$ 11.00$ 63.99$ 77,362.06$ 9.75$
PUBLIC WORKS
Arrellano, Antonio 1,799.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,799.23$ - Barajas, Michael 3,583.56$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,583.56$ - Camacho, Armando 1,799.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,799.23$ - Castro, Joseph 2,959.55$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,959.55$ -
Cervantes, Pedro 1,420.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,420.31$ - Cruz-Villalobos, Eulises 1,304.80$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,304.80$ - Garcia, Destiny 1,715.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,715.23$ - Garcia, Guadalupe 1,420.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,420.31$ - Gastelum, Humberto 2,922.72$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,922.72$ - Gutierrez Olivarez, Norberto 1,511.08$ -$ 4.37 158.10$ - -$ - -$ 1,669.17$ - Hernandez, Julian 1,715.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,715.69$ - Isaak, Denise 2,182.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,182.15$ -
Jimenez, Gabriela 1,489.08$ -$ 46.00 1,403.10$ - -$ 32.00 575.63$ 3,467.81$ - Kaur, Harmeen 1,848.64$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,848.64$ 5.25 Lopez, Joel 1,043.84$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,043.84$ -
Lopez, Josue 1,489.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,489.08$ -
Martinez, Jaime 1,304.80$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,304.80$ - Morales, Andres 1,715.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,715.69$ - Ortiz, Carlos 1,913.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,913.69$ -
Perez, Ruben Lopez 1,775.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,775.08$ - Ramirez, Manuel 2,516.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,516.00$ - Rivera, Coty 2,057.54$ -$ 28.25 1,318.11$ - -$ 31.00 797.30$ 4,172.94$ 30.00 Sanchez, Daniel 2,507.48$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,507.48$ - Soto, Samuel 1,794.15$ -$ 1.00 32.70$ - -$ - -$ 1,826.86$ - Tinoco, Alfonso 2,210.46$ -$ - -$ - -$ 1.00 27.01$ 2,237.47$ - Valdivia, Blanco 945.98$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 945.98$ -
TOTAL 48,945.36$ -$ 79.62 2,912.01$ - -$ 64.00$ 1,399.93$ 53,257.30$ 35.25$
PLANNING
Campos, Manuel 1,759.54$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,759.54$ 4.50 Martinez, Mabel - FINAL PAY 2,528.07$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,528.07$ - Orozco, Jesus 3,593.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,593.15$ -
TOTAL 7,880.76$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,880.76$ 4.50$
PLANNING COUNCIL
Bandy, R 75.00$ Yep, G 125.00$
Molloy, Cory 75.00$ Herrera, I 125.00$
Nehring, K 150.00$ Nijjer, B 125.00$
Nunez, M 75.00$ Coleman, J -$
Felker, R 75.00$ Pacheco, M 125.00$
Bishop, S 75.00$
Villar, V -$
Total 525.00$ Total 500.00$
GRAND TOTAL:$ 184,223.89 $ 0.00 220.31 $ 8,830.63 - $ 0.00 75.00 $1,463.92 194,518.44$ 61.88
9 Section 5, Item B.
CITY OF KERMAN
PAYROLL REPORT
RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED
ADMINISTRATION
Alvarez, Josefina 3,748.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,748.31$ - Camacho, Josie 2,515.54$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,515.54$ -
Cheema, Akayla 2,356.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,356.62$ -
Gonzalez, Diana 3,553.84$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,553.84$ - Jansons, John 6,678.60$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 6,678.60$ -
Linares, Vanessa 1,566.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,566.15$ - Lopez, Jacqueline 2,221.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,221.08$ 9.00 Mendoza Hernandez, Ariana 1,751.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,751.23$ 3.00 Mendoza, Gabriela 2,019.38$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,019.38$ 9.00 Reyes, Marcia 3,669.51$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,669.51$ -
Sandoval, Veronica 1,494.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,494.15$ 4.50 TOTAL 31,574.41$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 31,574.41$ 21.00
REC/SOCIAL
Acosta-Parra, Melany 232.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 232.50$ - Aguilar, Corina 38.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 38.75$ -
Arredondo, Raquel 552.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 552.00$ -
Brar, Manreet 232.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 232.50$ -
Burdine-Slaven, Jeanna 2,248.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,248.62$ - Barrett, Shannon 1,678.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,678.15$ 3.00 Escamilla, Paloma 93.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 93.00$ -
Flores, Haley 1,678.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,678.15$ -
Garcia, Anthony 1,439.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,439.08$ - Hurlbert, Ronald 372.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 372.00$ -
Jauriqui, Jose 610.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 610.50$ -
Johnson, Theresa 3,186.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,186.62$ - Lujan, Vanessa 425.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 425.00$ -
Martinez, Aylah 542.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 542.50$ -
Martinez, Jeness 175.62$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 175.62$ -
Martinez Lopez, Jose 589.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 589.00$ - Negrete, Dean 1,586.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,586.31$ -
Ortiz, Maryjane 255.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 255.75$ -
Pena, Mercedes 213.13$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 213.13$ -
Ruiz, Rosalba 627.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 627.00$ -
Salvador, Mark 2,922.72$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,922.72$ -
Sidhu, Nirmal 2,054.77$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,054.77$ -
Silva, Jessica 341.00$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 341.00$ -
Tovar, Jessica 534.75$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 534.75$ -
Villarreal, Arlene 2,100.32$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,100.32$ - TOTAL 24,729.72$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,729.72$ 3.00
POLICE
Antuna, Miguel 2,714.12$ -$ 20.00 969.33$ - -$ - -$ 3,683.45$ - Arciga, Jose 2,809.42$ -$ 22.50 1,118.74$ - -$ 8.00 66.30$ 3,994.45$ - Barbosa, Isaias 2,902.48$ -$ 14.00 719.37$ - -$ - -$ 3,621.84$ 4.50 Barcoma, Wilbert 4,272.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 4,272.23$ - Barra, Brenden 2,070.80$ -$ 16.25 582.77$ - -$ - -$ 2,653.57$ - Belding, Jeff 3,578.45$ -$ - -$ - -$ 3.50 37.02$ 3,615.47$ 4.50 Castro, Jaclynn 2,031.42$ -$ 7.25 254.91$ - -$ - -$ 2,286.33$ - Chapman, Tom 3,435.42$ -$ 5.00 301.15$ - -$ - -$ 3,736.58$ - Clark, Patrick 2,382.12$ -$ 28.00 1,389.57$ - -$ - -$ 3,771.69$ - Coronado, Krystal 2,018.15$ -$ 6.00 252.27$ - -$ - -$ 2,270.41$ - Corrales, Edith 857.50$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 857.50$ -
Cubillos, Theresa 2,764.38$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,764.38$ 1.50 Garcia, Andrew 2,067.69$ -$ 4.00 147.69$ - -$ - -$ 2,215.38$ - Gempis, Danzel 1,875.23$ -$ 2.00 66.97$ - -$ - -$ 1,942.20$ - Golden, John 5,005.20$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 5,005.20$ -
Gutierrez, Gloria 2,135.40$ -$ 2.00 79.14$ - -$ - -$ 2,214.54$ - Inthasone, Bryant 1,968.92$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,968.92$ 4.50 Irazoqui, Mario 1,706.86$ -$ 7.00 224.03$ - -$ - -$ 1,930.89$ - Levandusky, James 2,342.13$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,342.13$ - PAY PERIOD: March 19, 2023 - April 01, 2023
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY
10 Section 5, Item B.
CITY OF KERMAN
PAYROLL REPORT
RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED PAY PERIOD: March 19, 2023 - April 01, 2023
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY
Lozano, Daniel 1,521.20$ -$ 11.00 313.75$ - -$ - -$ 1,834.95$ - Lozano, Patricia 1,320.46$ -$ 4.00 99.03$ - -$ - -$ 1,419.50$ - Mendoza, Sandra 3,084.31$ -$ 6.00 327.78$ - -$ - -$ 3,412.09$ - Molina, Jesus 2,305.19$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,305.19$ 1.50 Quintanilla, Rodolfo 2,080.65$ -$ 42.50 1,531.63$ - -$ - -$ 3,612.27$ - Rodrigues, Mary 2,257.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,257.69$ - Roth, Adriana 2,080.65$ -$ 14.00 504.54$ - -$ - -$ 2,585.18$ - Ruiz, Jose 1,984.61$ -$ 14.00 640.70$ - -$ - -$ 2,625.32$ - Vasquez, Francisco 1,947.11$ -$ 44.00 1,510.23$ - -$ - -$ 3,457.35$ - Velez, Bernice 1,645.36$ -$ 2.00 61.70$ - -$ - -$ 1,707.06$ - TOTAL: 71,461.01$ -$ 271.50$ 11,095.30$ -$ -$ 13.50$ 113.94$ 82,670.24$ 16.50$
PUBLIC WORKS
Arrellano, Antonio 1,799.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,799.23$ - Barajas, Michael 3,583.56$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,583.56$ - Camacho, Armando 1,799.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,799.23$ - Castro, Joseph 2,959.55$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,959.55$ -
Cervantes, Pedro 1,420.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,420.31$ - Cruz-Villalobos, Eulises 1,304.80$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,304.80$ - Garcia, Destiny 1,715.23$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,715.23$ - Garcia, Guadalupe 1,420.31$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,420.31$ - Gastelum, Humberto 2,922.72$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,922.72$ - Gutierrez Olivarez, Norberto 1,511.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,511.08$ - Hernandez, Julian 1,715.69$ -$ 41.00 1,426.25$ - -$ 32.00 666.28$ 3,808.22$ - Isaak, Denise 2,182.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,182.15$ -
Jimenez, Gabriela 1,489.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,489.08$ - Kaur, Harmeen 1,848.64$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,848.64$ -
Lopez, Joel 1,296.65$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,296.65$ -
Lopez, Josue 1,489.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,489.08$ 3.00 Martinez, Jaime 1,304.80$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,304.80$ - Morales, Andres 1,715.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,715.69$ - Ortiz, Carlos 1,913.69$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,913.69$ -
Perez, Ruben Lopez 1,775.08$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 1,775.08$ - Ramirez, Manuel 2,516.00$ -$ 1.00 47.17$ - -$ - -$ 2,563.17$ - Rivera, Coty 2,057.54$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,057.54$ -
Sanchez, Daniel 2,507.48$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 2,507.48$ 1.50 Soto, Samuel 1,794.15$ -$ 1.00 32.70$ - -$ - -$ 1,826.86$ - Tinoco, Alfonso 2,210.46$ -$ 48.50 2,140.21$ - -$ 32.00 864.18$ 5,214.85$ - Valdivia, Blanco 945.98$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 945.98$ -
TOTAL 49,198.17$ -$ 91.50 3,646.33$ - -$ 64.00$ 1,530.46$ 54,374.96$ 4.50$
PLANNING
Campos, Manuel 1,845.02$ -$ 2.75 92.56$ - -$ - -$ 1,937.57$ - Orozco, Jesus 3,593.15$ -$ - -$ - -$ - -$ 3,593.15$ -
TOTAL 5,438.17$ -$ 2.75$ 92.56$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,530.72$ -$
PLANNING COUNCIL
Bandy, R -$ Yep, G 125.00$
Molloy, Cory -$ Herrera, I 125.00$
Nehring, K -$ Nijjer, B 125.00$
Nunez, M -$ Coleman, J 125.00$
Felker, R -$ Pacheco, M 125.00$
Bishop, S -$
Villar, V -$
Total -$ Total 625.00$
GRAND TOTAL:$ 183,026.48 $ 0.00 365.75 $ 14,834.19 - $ 0.00 77.50 $1,644.40 199,505.07$ 45.00
11 Section 5, Item B.
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
Gmendoza
4/21/2023 11:11 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
2023ACH 10147 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT03/ 24/
032423 C PR TAX DEPOSIT- 03/24/23- SDI PAYABLE= SDIAMOUNT 1,693.19 032423 C PR TAX DEPOSIT- 03/24/23- SIT PAYABLE= PITAMOUNT 3,846.44 63Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10147: 5,539.
2023ACH 10517 FEDERAL TAXES PAYROLL 03/24/
032423 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 03/24/23- FICA PAYABLE= SOCIAL SECURITY 23,545.72 032423 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 03/24/23- FICA MED PAYABLE= MEDICARE 5,506.66 032423 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 03/24/23- FIT PAYABLE= TAX WITHHOLDING 12,472.16 54Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10517: 41,524.
2023ACH 10518 KERMAN POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 03/24/
032423 C MEMBERSHIP DUES- 03/24/23 735.50
50Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10518: 735.
2023ACH 10519 KERMAN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSN03/24/
032423 C MEMBERSHIP DUES 03/24/23 165.00
00Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10519: 165.
2023ACH 10520 ICMA-RC 03/24/
032423 C LOAN PAYMENTS 2,666.80
032423 C DEFERRED COMP- 03/24/23 2,667.40
20Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10520: 5,334.
2023ACH 10522 CALPERS 03/24/
032423 C EMPLOYER PAID CONTRIBUTIONS- 03/24/23 16,007.88 032423 EMPLOYEE PAID CONTRIBUTIONS 12,733.32
20Total for thisACH Check for Vendor 10522: 28,741.
07Total for 3/24/2023: 82,040.
Report Total (6 checks): 82,040.07
1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:11 AM) Page 12 Section 5, Item C.
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
Gmendoza
4/21/2023 11:14 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
202326477 UB*01647 MICHAEL CARLSON 04/03/
Refund Check 012860-000, 15647 WOOTEN CT 146.19
19Total for Check Number 26477: 146.
202326478 UB*01643 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-198, 103 S 16TH ST 41.73
73Total for Check Number 26478: 41.
202326479 UB*01644 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-213, 131 S 16TH ST 0.68
68Total for Check Number 26479: 0.
202326480 UB*01649 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-214, 136 S 16TH ST 6.49
Refund Check 015223-214, 136 S 16TH ST 0.15
64Total for Check Number 26480: 6.
202326481 UB*01650 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-200, 14206 W GRAGNANI AVE 12.75
Refund Check 015223-200, 14206 W GRAGNANIAVE 0.23
98Total for Check Number 26481: 12.
202326482 UB*01652 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-196, 107 S MCKENNAAVE 0.27
Refund Check 015223-196, 107 S MCKENNAAVE 16.87
14Total for Check Number 26482: 17.
202326483 UB*01655 CENTURY COMMUNITIES 04/03/
Refund Check 015223-211, 192 S MCKENNAAVE 34.22
22Total for Check Number 26483: 34.
202326484 UB*01646 BILLY EZERNACK 04/03/
Refund Check 018837-000, 14463 W CALIFORNIAAVE 12.45
Refund Check 018837-000, 14463 W CALIFORNIAAVE 15.18
Refund Check 018837-000, 14463 W CALIFORNIAAVE 10.12
Refund Check 018837-000, 14463 W CALIFORNIAAVE 24.90
65Total for Check Number 26484: 62.
202326485 UB*01642 JOSEPH CROWN CONSTRUCTION 04/03/
Refund Check 014325-299, 15871 W ISABELLAAVE 3.81
81Total for Check Number 26485: 3.
202326486 UB*01653 JOSEPH CROWN CONSTRUCTION 04/03/
1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 13 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
Refund Check 014325-298, 15828 W REGALAVE 0.07
Refund Check 014325-298, 15828 W REGALAVE 3.17
24Total for Check Number 26486: 3.
202326487 UB*01651 NA LANDSEADAL 04/03/
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 10.35
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 18.45
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 0.67
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 12.75
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 1.07
Refund Check 018720-000, 15155 W D ST 148.31
60Total for Check Number 26487: 191.
202326488 UB*01648 NICOLE LEE 04/03/
Refund Check 013723-002, 16167 W E ST 135.56
56Total for Check Number 26488: 135.
202326489 UB*01654 CHRISTY & MARK MCNABB 04/03/
Refund Check 012010-000, 302 S PARK AVE 0.18
Refund Check 012010-000, 302 S PARK AVE 10.15
Refund Check 012010-000, 302 S PARK AVE 2.46
79Total for Check Number 26489: 12.
202326490 UB*01645 JULIA OAXACA 04/03/
Refund Check 008399-000, 472 S 4TH ST 0.72
Refund Check 008399-000, 472 S 4TH ST 0.10
Refund Check 008399-000, 472 S 4TH ST 3.11
Refund Check 008399-000, 472 S 4TH ST 5.53
Refund Check 008399-000, 472 S 4TH ST 3.82
28Total for Check Number 26490: 13.
51Total for 4/3/2023: 682.
202326491 12257 AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP 04/06/
032823 HR- CLAIMS FUNDING ENDING 03/25/23 2,603.60
040123 HR- APRIL PREMIUMS 422.50
10Total for Check Number 26491: 3,026.
202326492 11355 BADGER METER 04/06/
80122602 FIN- BEACON HOSTING SERV UNIT MARCH 2023 115.38 80122602 FIN- BEACON HOSTING SERV UNIT MARCH 2023 115.38 76Total for Check Number 26492: 230.
202326493 12358 CAL VALLEY CONSTRUCTION INC 04/06/
PPR 02 CAP- VINELAND AVE REHAB PROJECT PMT #2 156,329.19 PPR 02 CAP- VINELAND AVE REHAB PROJECT PMT #2 139,622.69 88Total for Check Number 26493: 295,951.
202326494 10064 CAL VALLEY PRINTING 04/06/
38934 CC- EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS- CODE ENFORCEMENT 50.88
38934 ADM- EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS- ADMIN 693.88
2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 14 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
76Total for Check Number 26494: 744.
202326495 11633 FAVIOLA CARDENAS 04/06/
035307 CC- COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES- MARCH 60.00
00Total for Check Number 26495: 60.
202326496 12315 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA SPCA 04/06/
26303 AAC- 2 FERAL FELINE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY CASE 23-0918 112.00 00Total for Check Number 26496: 112.
202326497 10452 CITY OF FRESNO WMD 04/06/
COK2212054 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2212054 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 44.00
COK2212054 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2212054 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 4.00
COK2212054 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2212130 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2212130 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2212130 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2212213 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2212213 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2212213 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2212283 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2212283 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2212283 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2301030 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 4.00
COK2301030 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 21.00
COK2301030 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2301030 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 13.00
COK2301030 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 15.00
COK2301030 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2301030 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2301098 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2301098 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 33.00
COK2301098 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2301098 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2301156 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2301156 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2301156 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2301241 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2301241 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2301241 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2301255 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 7.50
COK2301326 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2301326 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2301336 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2302026 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 7.50
COK2302077 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2302077 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2302077 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 4.00
COK2302077 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 44.00
COK2302077 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2302155 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2302155 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2302155 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2302220 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2302220 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 15 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
COK2302220 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2302262 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2302262 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2302262 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2303062 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 44.00
COK2303062 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2303062 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2303062 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2303062 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 4.00
COK2303149 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
COK2303149 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2303149 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2303205 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2303205 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2303205 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
00Total for Check Number 26497: 1,717.
202326498 10103 COLONIAL LIFE 04/06/
34202050401407 HR- MARCH EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 604.12
34202050401407 HR- ROUNDINGADJ - 0.03
09Total for Check Number 26498: 604.
202326499 10106 CON EDISON CLEAN ENERGY 04/06/
104810 REC 6%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 530.13
104810 PLAN - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 33.13
104810 SWR - SOLAR ARRAY 2 0301-033123 3,958.76
104810 CLRK - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 66.26
104810 VE 3%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 265.06
104810 PLAN - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 33.13
104810 PARKS 1%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 88.36
104810 ADM - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 16.57
104810 PD 5%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 441.78
104810 WTR 71%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 6,273.22
104810 ADM - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 16.57
104810 PLAN REC 1%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 88.36
104810 ADM - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 16.56
104810 SWR 1%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 88.36
104810 SC 2%- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 176.71
104810 ADM - SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 16.57
104810 SWR - SOLAR ORIGINAL 0301-033123 8,038.09
104810 CITY HALL 3 %- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 66.27
104810 CTC 7 %- SOLAR RESBCT 0301-033123 618.49
38Total for Check Number 26499: 20,832.
202326500 10108 COOKS COMMUNICATIONS CORP 04/06/
153574 PD REP- INPUT ADAPTER FOR TOUGHBOOK 156.92
92Total for Check Number 26500: 156.
202326501 10826 CROWN SERVICES CORPORATION 04/06/
2621541 REC- PORT APOTTS HANDWASH STATION FOR 03/15/23 FARMERS MARKET 312.69 69Total for Check Number 26501: 312.
202326502 10119 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES 04/06/
17120 PD- 2 CASES OF LARGE 2 CASES OF XL GLOVES 278.64
4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 16 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
64Total for Check Number 26502: 278.
202326503 10157 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 04/06/
1777688 SWR- SUPPLIES FOR PONDS 126.13
1777723 WTR- EMERGENCY HYDRANT REPAIR AT SUNSET/MADERA 880.20 33Total for Check Number 26503: 1,006.
202326504 12280 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE CO04/06/ 165700845 HR- APRILVISION PREMIUM 778.67
165700849 HR- APRIL COBRAVISION PREMIUM 12.87
54Total for Check Number 26504: 791.
202326505 11028 FRESNO HUMANE ANIMAL SERVICES 04/06/
20241-032423 AC- 2 FLATS OF FELINE VACCINE DAPP 95.88
20241-032423 AC- 2 FLATS OF CANINE DOG VACCINE DAPP 115.44 20241-032423 AC- 2 FLATS OF BORDETALLA VACCINE 135.76
08Total for Check Number 26505: 347.
202326506 10185 GRAINGER 04/06/
9655461201 SWR- SPLIT JAW CLAMP METER 215.99
99Total for Check Number 26506: 215.
202326507 11358 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES04/06/
33723065 VE- LANIER MPC307 COPIER FLEET SHOP 154.61
33723066 PD- PATROL OPS COPIER/FAX 179.82
33723067 BPO- LANIER/MP C3004 COPIER 125.29
33723067 BPO- LANIER/MP C3004 COPIER 125.29
01Total for Check Number 26507: 585.
202326508 10239 KERWEST INC 04/06/
23061 CC- ORD 23-02 PUBLICATION 1,238.00
00Total for Check Number 26508: 1,238.
202326509 10282 OFFICE DEPOT 04/06/
301729896001 PD- OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.96
302159240001 ADM- HEATER 54.48
44Total for Check Number 26509: 78.
202326510 11833 ORKIN 04/06/
239794898 CTC- PEST CONTROL CTC- MARCH 2023 116.99
99Total for Check Number 26510: 116.
202326511 10289 P.G.& E. 04/06/
2881141119-9 CS- CNG VEHICLES FUEL- MARCH 2023 657.03
5467738309-0 WTR/SWR/SD -02/14/23-03/15/23 308.01
5467738309-0 WTR/SWR/SD -02/14/23-03/15/23 20,961.20
5467738309-0 WTR/SWR/SD -02/14/23-03/15/23 337.90
5467738309-0 WTR/SWR/SD 02/14/23-03/15/23 TRUE UP 26.29 8542225974-8 PARKS 1%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 3.64 8542225974-8 CTC 7%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 25.50 8542225974-8 ADMIN- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 0.69 8542225974-8 CITY HALL 3%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 2.74 8542225974-8 VE 3%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 10.93 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 17 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
8542225974-8 ADMIN- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 0.68 8542225974-8 ADMIN- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 0.68 8542225974-8 ADMIN- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 0.68 8542225974-8 REC 6%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 21.86 8542225974-8 PLANN- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 1.36 8542225974-8 SC 2%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 7.30 8542225974-8 PD 5%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 18.22 8542225974-8 SWR 1%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 3.64 8542225974-8 PLAN REC 1%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 3.64 8542225974-8 BLDG- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 1.37 8542225974-8 WTR 71%- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 258.68 8542225974-8 CITY CLKR- SOLAR CONNECTION FEE 02/23-03/23 2.73 9081203718-3 CS- KATEYS PARK- MARCH 2023 76.95
72Total for Check Number 26511: 22,731.
202326512 11772 RELIABLE TRANSLATIONS, INC 04/06/
24403 BPO- PC TRANSCRIPTION/TRANSLATION OF 03/13 MEETING 1,873.60 60Total for Check Number 26512: 1,873.
202326513 11506 SCA OF CALLC 04/06/
2023-002000 STRT- STREET SWEEPING MAR 2023 8,500.00
00Total for Check Number 26513: 8,500.
202326514 10337 SLUMBERGER LUMBER 04/06/
ACCT 3305 WTR- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 49.02
ACCT 3305 SWR- SUPPLIES FOR ASEWER PROJECT AT 969 1ST 177.90 ACCT 3305 SWR- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 51.70
ACCT 3305 WTR- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 15.98
ACCT 3305 SWR- SUPPLIES FOR SPRAYING THE SEWER PLANT 55.44 ACCT 3305 SWR- SUPPLIES FOR ASEWER PROJECT AT 969 1ST 307.58 62Total for Check Number 26514: 657.
202326515 11460 SUPERIOR POOL PRODUCTS LLC 04/06/
Q2022319 WTR- 170 GAL BULK CHLORINE WELL 9A 604.48
48Total for Check Number 26515: 604.
202326516 10357 TAYLOR MADE IRRIGATION 04/06/
26260 MEDIANS- IRRIGATION FITTINGS 84.39
39Total for Check Number 26516: 84.
202326517 10754 THE HOME DEPOT PRO-SUPPLY WORKS04/06/
738032010 CS- AIR FILTERS - CTC HVAC 83.67
67Total for Check Number 26517: 83.
202326518 10371 TJ LAW & ASSOCIATES INVESTIGATIONS04/06/ 23-072 PD- J. CARDENAS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION CSO APPLICANT 400.00 00Total for Check Number 26518: 400.
202326519 10651 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 04/06/
0785837 LICENSE FEE FOR UPRR AGREEMENT (PROJECT 0785837) 5,000.00 00Total for Check Number 26519: 5,000.
202326520 10387 USA BLUE BOOK 04/06/
6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 18 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
300012 WTR- CHLORINE RESIDUAL TESTER 492.93
93Total for Check Number 26520: 492.
202326521 12178 VALLEYANIMAL CENTER SPAY & NEUTER CLINIC04/ 06/ 113387 AC- RESCUE DISCOUNT - 5.40
113387 AC- CANINE NEUTERED RABIE VACCINE CASE 22-2778 122.00 113777 AC- RESCUE DISCOUNT - 19.00
113777 AC- EUTHANASIAOF CANINE 40-65# CASE 22-2963 95.00 60Total for Check Number 26521: 192.
202326522 10391 VALLEY FARM SUPPLY STORES 04/06/
020623 STRTS- SUPPLIES- 6 INV <$50 93.81
020623 PARKS- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 54.47
020623 WTR- SUPPLIES- 7 INV <$50 156.53
020623 SWR- SUPPLIES- 5 INV <$50 190.82
020723 VE EQUIP- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 44.91
020923 LLD- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 19.60
152499 SD- PAILS TOWELS EYE WASH SOAP GLOVES 62.93
152531 SWR- 2 TOOL BOXES FOR WWTP CREW 326.90
152599 WTR- 2" AIR VENT 54.47
152653 PARKS- BLUE PAINT MARKER STIHL CHAIN 59.14
152817 PD REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 34.83
152877 VE REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 18.73
153068 MEDIANS- STIHIL CHAINS 50.98
175048 PARK- HORIZON SPRAY HOUSE 61.83
175086 SWR- SHOVEL PICK 66.89
175093 SWR- RESPIRATOR CARTRIDGE 118.75
175150 MEDIANS- SUPPLIES 141.40
175187 SD- MASK SILICONE RESP 75.06
175213 STRTS- PUNCH PIN CRESCENT SHOVEL 144.90
175260 SM EQUIP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 24.69
175319 VE EQUIP- 150 PC MECHANIC TOOLS SET 577.52
175330 VE EQUIP- BATTERY CHAINSAW 250.63
175389 PARKS- PICKUP TOOL 58.82
175696 PARKS- DOUBLE HITCH MOUNT CHROME INTERLOCK 112.33 175718 SD- SUPPLIES FOR WIRING OF LIONS PARK POND PUMPS 155.68 175732 VE EQUIP- FLEX VOLT MAX BATT 337.81
175872 BLDG- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 25.06
49Total for Check Number 26522: 3,319.
202326523 12290 VERIZON 04/06/
324000044097 VE- VEHICLE TRACKING SUBSCRIPTION- 03/01/23-03/31/23 644.30 624000033752 PD- MONTHLY GPS SERVICE FOR KPD VEHICLES 03/01/23-03/31/23 625.35 65Total for Check Number 26523: 1,269.
202326524 10399 VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER 04/06/
218815 AAC- 2 EUTHANASIA CANINES CASE 23-0712 23-0589 90.00 00Total for Check Number 26524: 90.
202326525 12378 VISALIAINDUSTRIAL TEXTILES INC 04/06/
40204 PD- LESS LETHAL ORANGE SLINGS- REPLACING OLD SLINGS 1,349.40 40Total for Check Number 26525: 1,349.
202326526 10419 ZIM INDUSTRIES INC 04/06/
4400 PULL PUMPAG WELL-DEGROOT LEASE 6,300.00
7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 19 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
00Total for Check Number 26526: 6,300.
15Total for 4/6/2023: 381,356.
202326527 11525 ADOLPHS A-1 TREE SERVICE 04/13/
653-2023 TREE TRMG- TRIM CYPRESS & REDWOODS AT CITY HALL 5,000.00 00Total for Check Number 26527: 5,000.
202326528 11387 LUISAAGUIRRE 04/13/
040323 REC- INSTRUCTOR FEE-ZUMBA MAR 2023 605.50
50Total for Check Number 26528: 605.
202326529 10040 AT&T MOBILITY 04/13/
287286967034X04 PD- MAR MDT WIRELESS SERVICE 03/01/23-03/31/23 477.16 287287185708X04 PD- SRO CELL PHONES/MDT 178.84
287288087181X04 PD- ACT CELL PHONE IPAD SERVICE AND NEW IPAD 9 GEN 129.28 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 129.40 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 159.53 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 44.58 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 23.71 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 159.53 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 12.41 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 118.56 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 5.93 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 12.41 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 22.29 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 12.41 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 118.56 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 46.90 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 12.41 287293504071X04 VAR- TABLETS FOR FOOD BANK PROGRAM- 03/01/23-03/31/23 80.48 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 51.95 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 136.06 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 22.29 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 8.89 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 44.58 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 22.28 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 22.29 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 190.35 287293504071X04 VAR- MONTHLY CELLULAR SERVICE- 03/01/23-03/31/23 44.58 66Total for Check Number 26529: 2,287.
202326530 12382 SHANNON BARRETT 04/13/
033023 REC- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - FIREBAUGH FARMERS MARKET 38.12 040123 REC- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - TESORO VIEJO FARMERS MARKET 45.33 45Total for Check Number 26530: 83.
202326531 12075 RHONDA BREWER 04/13/
040323 REC- INSTRUCTOR FEE-HIIT FITNESS MARCH 2023 217.00 00Total for Check Number 26531: 217.
202326532 10617 C A REDING CO INC 04/13/
665806 SWR 50%- LANIER MPC4504 COPIES 022823-033023 55.91 665806 WTR 50%- LANIER MPC4504 COPIES 022823-033023 55.92 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 20 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- REC ADMIN 30.00
666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- KERMAN WELLNESS HUB 8.40 666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- PLANNED REC 40.00
666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- ALMOND FESTIVAL 30.00 666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- YSB 9.35
666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- SR CTR SVC 10.04
666018 CS- SC-LANIER MPC4504 MAR 23- GENERAL COPIES 89.28 90Total for Check Number 26532: 328.
202326533 10067 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 04/13/
033123 FIN- BLDG STANDARDS ADMN FEE 3RD QTR FY 22/23 164.70 70Total for Check Number 26533: 164.
202326534 10078 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 04/13/
0195001403-01 C WITHHOLDING ORDER P/R DATE 04/07/23 319.93 93Total for Check Number 26534: 319.
202326535 12126 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 04/13/
7955597 CS- TRASH LINERS/CLEANER - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 379.35 35Total for Check Number 26535: 379.
202326536 10109 COUNTY OF FRESNO 04/13/
041123 PD- MAR PARKING ACTIVITY 486.00
00Total for Check Number 26536: 486.
202326537 10114 CROWN SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 04/13/
118546 SDWLK REP- CONCRETE 415 S MADERAAVE- SIDEWALK REPAIR 613.53 53Total for Check Number 26537: 613.
202326538 10715 DC HEATING AND COOLING 04/13/
1594 CS- LO CHARGE REFILL- CITY HALL SERVER ROOM 295.00 00Total for Check Number 26538: 295.
202326539 10126 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 04/13/
033123 FIN- STRONG MOTION 3RD QTR FY 2022/2023 480.88
88Total for Check Number 26539: 480.
202326540 10128 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 04/13/
647560 PD- MARCH LIVE SCAN 32.00
00Total for Check Number 26540: 32.
202326541 12380 DULCE DERAS 04/13/
00330097 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 04/01/23 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26541: 100.
202326542 10571 DITCH WITCH 04/13/
501630 VE EQUIP- HOSES FOR MUD VAC 725.04
04Total for Check Number 26542: 725.
202326543 10136 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 04/13/
033123 FIN- REMIT STATE FEE ON BUS LIC 82.60
9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 21 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
60Total for Check Number 26543: 82.
202326544 12056 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 04/13/
223119 STRTS- POLYFLEX CRACK SEALER 2,525.50
50Total for Check Number 26544: 2,525.
202326545 11398 FASTSIGNS 04/13/
FRES-96911 REC- KFM PARKING DATE SIGNS REMAINING BALANCE 12.60 FRES-97959 REC- KERMAN FARMERS MARKET- 2 72" X 36" BANNERS 448.57 17Total for Check Number 26545: 461.
202326546 11550 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE - CIVIL UNIT04/ 13/ 2022-5723 C FTB-WAGE GARNISHMENT P/R DATE- 04/07/2023 137.00 00Total for Check Number 26546: 137.
202326547 10162 FRESNO COUNTY TREASURER 04/13/
SO20410 PD- MAR RMS/JMS/CAD ACCESS FEES 188.04
SO20410 PD- APR DISPATCHING SERVICES 22,102.14
18Total for Check Number 26547: 22,290.
202326548 10169 FRESNO PET CEMETERY 04/13/
45298 AAC- 23 ANIMAL CARCASSES DISPOSED OF PLUS PICK UP FEE 307.80 80Total for Check Number 26548: 307.
202326549 10176 GALLS LLC 04/13/
5286277 WTR 50%- FLASHLIGHTS-2 74.66
5286277 SWR 50%- FLASHLIGHTS-2 74.66
5286277 VE- FLASHLIGHTS-2 149.33
65Total for Check Number 26549: 298.
202326550 12379 GILL CHEVROLET 04/13/
C137-23 VE CAP- 2023 CHEV SILVERADO 2500HD 55,973.28
28Total for Check Number 26550: 55,973.
202326551 10185 GRAINGER 04/13/
9624587375 SWR- UPS UNIT FOR BIOLAC POND 565.90
90Total for Check Number 26551: 565.
202326552 10191 H & J CHEVROLET INC 04/13/
54477 VE CAP- REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF NEW SILVERADO FEES - 74.00 54548 VE CAP- REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF NEW SILVERADO FEES - 37.00 CVW29568 VE REP- CREDIT ON INV 29546 ALREADY PAID - 435.68 CVW29737 VE REP- TURN SIGNAL SWITCH #1374 213.64
CVW29787 VE REP- MODULE & SENSOR KIT #1424 523.68
CVW29904 VE REP- SPARK PLUG WIRE KIT #1397 118.13
77Total for Check Number 26552: 308.
202326553 12187 HAMNER JEWELL & ASSOCIATES 04/13/
202475 CS- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- RAILROAD PROPERTYACQUISITION FEB 23 2,346.74 74Total for Check Number 26553: 2,346.
202326554 10767 IDESIGN CUSTOM SCREEN PRINTING 04/13/
10AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 22 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
032223 REC- START SMART BASEBALL SHIRTS 374.00
032823 REC- YOUTH THEATER SHIRTS 278.00
00Total for Check Number 26554: 652.
202326555 10222 JERRY'S AUTOMOTIVE 04/13/
991614 VE REP- STEERING WHEELAIRBAG REPAIR #1397 253.00 00Total for Check Number 26555: 253.
202326556 10251 LIGHTHOUSE ELECTRIC INC 04/13/
30530 SWR- PUSH BUTTON STATION HEADWORKS INV # OF 50% AT COMPLETION 3,405.52 52Total for Check Number 26556: 3,405.
202326557 12381 MONICA LOPEZ 04/13/
00331767 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 04/01/23 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26557: 100.
202326558 10678 MAC'S EQUIPMENT INC 04/13/
258256 VE REP- BACK UP ALARMS #1548 & 1549 69.72
259123 WTR- FILTERS FOR WELL #9 119.86
259124 PD - CAR COVER NEW TAHOE 83.89
259126 BLDG- FILTER FOR PD GENERATOR 41.08
259447 VE EQUIP- BATTERY FOR TRENCHER 307.28
259495 WTR- HOSE & CLAMP WELL 9 42.30
13Total for Check Number 26558: 664.
202326559 10261 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL INC 04/13/
033123 SWA- MARCH 2023 SW CHARGES 171,562.03
033123 SWA- CITY PORTION FOR MARCH 2023 - 34,312.41
033123 SWA- ROLL OFF/FRANCHISE FEES - 2,776.00
62Total for Check Number 26559: 134,473.
202326560 11965 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 04/13/
033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- UNIFORMS 1,507.96 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- STREET FLEX- MEASURE C 42.31 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- UNIFORMS 24.93
033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- VEHICLES 153.11
033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- STREETS-ARTICLE VIII 143.94 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- BLDG MAINT 30.40
033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- STORM DRAIN 22.71 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- STREETS 35.76
033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- SOLID WASTE 16.98 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- WATER OPERATIONS 112.42 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING 105.95 033123 VAR- UNIFORMS, MATS, SUPPLIES- SEWER OPERATIONS 107.29 76Total for Check Number 26560: 2,303.
202326561 11014 NET TRANSCRIPTS 04/13/
NT15037 PD- TRANSCRIPTION FOR SIR 22-008 INVESTIGATION 65.67 67Total for Check Number 26561: 65.
202326562 10282 OFFICE DEPOT 04/13/
304305867001 PD- OFFICE SUPPLIES- TYLENOL EXTRA STRENGTH 15.90 11AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 23 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
90Total for Check Number 26562: 15.
202326563 10286 O'REILLYAUTOMOTIVE INC 04/13/
376171 PD REP- TURN SIGNAL SWITCH #1490 56.43
376405 PD REP- FUEL PUMP #1424 219.56
377311 VE SUPP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 14.34
377889 VE EQUIP- BATTERY FOR TORO MOWER 61.83
378010 VE REP- BATTERY FOR STOCK 130.13
378011 VE SUPP- MECHANICAL NITRILE GLOVES 62.09
378094 VE EQUIP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 4.21
378117 VE REP- WIPER BLADES #1461 72.45
378216 VE REP- WIPER BLADES #1395 72.45
378239 VE REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 21.80
378946 VE MAINT- AIR & OIL FILTERS BRAKE CLEANER 137.72 379241 PD REP- WHEEL CYLINDERS 59.94
379368 VE MAINT- SUPPLIES-1 INV <$50 14.67
379368 PD MAINT- SUPPLIES-1 INV <$50 14.68
379513 VE REP- PULLEYS BELTS BLWR PARTS TENSIONER #1395 175.16 379513 VE MAINT- AIR FILTER #1395 17.25
380765 VE REP- RETURN - 280.64
380828 VE REP- WIPER BLADES #1508 72.45
380828 VE MAINT- CABIN AIR & OIL FILTERS #1508 42.29
380833 VE REP- AC DRIER EXPANTION VALVE #1395 76.67
381281 SD- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 28.32
381298 VE REP- RETURN - 76.67
381836 VE - UNDERCOATING FOR NEW SILVERADO 63.16
382495 VE REP- BATTERY #1408 187.44
382507 VE REP- CORE RETURN - 22.00
73Total for Check Number 26563: 1,225.
202326564 10289 P.G.& E. 04/13/
4647279811-8 PD- MARCH PG&E 1,632.96
4939626163-5 VE- MONTHLY SERVICE 02/16/23-03/19/23 1,375.33 5741309690-0 PARKS- MONTHLY SERVICE 02/14/23-03/15/23 514.01 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 134.41 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 268.82 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 268.82 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 537.64 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 134.41 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 537.64 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 134.40 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7 03/02/23-03/30/23 134.41 85Total for Check Number 26564: 5,672.
202326565 10301 PETTY CASH 04/13/
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 37.75
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 38.10
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 51.19
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 25.00
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 35.98
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 19.00
040523 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 7.32
34Total for Check Number 26565: 214.
202326566 10315 QUINN COMPANY 04/13/
PC000538470 WTR- PARTS FOR WELL 9 GENERATOR 268.46
12AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 24 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
46Total for Check Number 26566: 268.
202326567 10316 R G EQUIPMENT OF FRESNO INC 04/13/
140983 VE EQUIP- MUFFLER FOR TORO MOWER 476.73
140984 VE EQUIP- BLADES FOR WALKER MOWER 72.25
98Total for Check Number 26567: 548.
202326568 11714 ROD CARSEY 04/13/
23-04A BPO- PLAN CHECK FEES- (MARCH 1-31 2023) 2,388.00 00Total for Check Number 26568: 2,388.
202326569 11041 ROSENBALM ROCKERY 04/13/
66966 SB1383- 75 TONS OF WALK ON BARK 3,146.65
65Total for Check Number 26569: 3,146.
202326570 10332 SEBASTIAN 04/13/
10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 105.85 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 5.28 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 344.98 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 47.71 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 22.20 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 236.04 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 208.76 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 21.64 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 86.00 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 153.38 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 114.90 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 70.63 10745498 VAR- SERVICES FOR CAMERA PROJ (PD)- 03/21/23-04/20/23 76.05 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 14.05 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 73.33 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 366.07 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 22.20 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 22.20 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 539.84 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 47.72 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 197.40 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 344.98 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 2.44 10745498 VAR- MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE- 03/21/23-04/20/23 31.20 85Total for Check Number 26570: 3,154.
202326571 11403 DAVINDER SIDHU 04/13/
00290575 CTC- CTC DEPOSIT 02/18/23 400.00
00Total for Check Number 26571: 400.
202326572 11650 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY COMPANY04/13/
128132240-001 MEDIANS- VALVE BOX HAND SAW 104.70
70Total for Check Number 26572: 104.
202326573 10337 SLUMBERGER LUMBER 04/13/
ACCT 3115 PARKS- SUPPLIES- 5 INV <$50 139.43
ACCT 3115 BLDG- LADDER CORDS 145.66
ACCT 3115 BLDG- FLUOR LIGHT TUBES 57.15
ACCT 3115 STRTS- SUPPLIES- 4 INV <$50 95.39
13AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 25 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
ACCT 3115 LLD- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 109.57
ACCT 3115 BLDG- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 18.49
ACCT 3115 SDWLK REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 45.08
ACCT 3115 SWR- 4" PIPE & COUPLINGS 315.96
ACCT 3115 PARKS- 1 YD CONCRETE (FOR PD GUN RANGE LIGHT FOOTINGS) 426.38 ACCT 3115 SDWLK REP- REDI-MIX CONCRETE 52.13
ACCT 3115 BLDG- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 28.17
ACCT 3115 LLD 50%- PLIERS WRECH 50.65
ACCT 3115 PARKS 50%- PLIERS WRECH 50.65
ACCT 3115 MEDIANS- SUPPLIES-2 INV <$50 43.46
ACCT 3116 CS- BLDG- MAINT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 316.26
ACCT 3116 CS- BLDG MAINT- GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.33
ACCT 3116 CS- BLDG- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 75.49
25Total for Check Number 26573: 2,066.
202326574 12054 SPARKLETTS 04/13/
21577585011523 PW- DRINKING WATER- PUBLIC WORKS 22.47
21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 11.59 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 8.44 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 5.27 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 8.57 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 8.57 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 17.14 21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 4.22 21577585011523 PW- DRINKING WATER- PUBLIC WORKS 22.47
21577585011523 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG CITY CLERK- JAN 2.11 85Total for Check Number 26574: 110.
202326575 11907 SPRINGBROOK HOLDING COMPANY LLC04/13/
INV-012406 FIN- MONTHLY WEB PAYMENTS MARCH 2023 172.41
INV-012406 FIN- MONTHLY WEB PAYMENTS MARCH 2023 495.42
INV-012406 FIN- MONTHLY WEB PAYMENTS MARCH 2023 623.17
00Total for Check Number 26575: 1,291.
202326576 11388 STREET DECOR INC 04/13/
34196 CS- HONOR BANNERS (11) 11 ACTIVE/VETERANS 1 MEMORIAL 1,466.42 42Total for Check Number 26576: 1,466.
202326577 10357 TAYLOR MADE IRRIGATION 04/13/
26355 MEDIANS- IRRIGATION FITTINGS 45.77
77Total for Check Number 26577: 45.
202326578 10754 THE HOME DEPOT PRO-SUPPLY WORKS04/13/
739114536 CS- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- APRIL 862.49
49Total for Check Number 26578: 862.
202326579 11502 TIREHUB LLC 04/13/
33469928 VE REP- 4-265/70/17 TIRES #1522 520.08
33677468 PD REP- 3-245/55/18 TIRES #1493 412.75
83Total for Check Number 26579: 932.
202326580 10168 UNITY IT 04/13/
365128 TECH- SCADA SUPPORT MARCH 2023 42.51
365128 TECH- MONTHLY TECH SUPPORT SERVICES- MARCH 2023 3,922.25 365128 TECH- HP BUSINESS DESKTOP PRODESK 600 G8 (HARMEEN) 949.32 14AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 26 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
365128 TECH- SCADASUPPORT MARCH 2023 42.50
365128 TECH- SDRAM FOR J. OROZCO DESKTOP 51.14
72Total for Check Number 26580: 5,007.
202326581 10377 US POST OFFICE 04/13/
040523 VAR- ADVANCE PMNT/UB PERMIT 2 2,000.00
040523 VAR- ADVANCE PMNT/UB PERMIT 2 1,100.00
040523 VAR- ADVANCE PMNT/UB PERMIT 2 800.00
040523 VAR- ADVANCE PMNT/UB PERMIT 2 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26581: 4,000.
202326582 10406 WEST HILLS OIL INC 04/13/
76696 VE- FUEL MAR 16-31 1,346.661 GALLONS 6,121.37
76696 VE- ACT PROGRAM PD 56.894 GALLONS 278.16
53Total for Check Number 26582: 6,399.
202326583 11035 WORLD OIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES04/13/
I500-00911640 VE- USED OIL DISPOSAL 45.00
00Total for Check Number 26583: 45.
55Total for 4/13/2023: 278,702.
202326584 UB*01660 GEORGE BARADIN 04/14/
Refund Check 005588-000, 965 S 1ST ST 122.97
97Total for Check Number 26584: 122.
202326585 UB*01659 ZOILA GUEVARA 04/14/
Refund Check 017312-000, 14447 W G ST 93.61
61Total for Check Number 26585: 93.
202326586 UB*01424 STUART ITOGA 04/14/
Refund Check 013587-000, 16168 W TROYAVE 4.60
Refund Check 013587-000, 16168 W TROYAVE 21.54
Refund Check 013587-000, 16168 W TROYAVE 0.64
Refund Check 013587-000, 16168 W TROYAVE 0.40
18Total for Check Number 26586: 27.
202326587 UB*01658 LONDON PROPERTIES LTD 04/14/
Refund Check 013337-000, 15920 W STANISLAUS AVE 0.05
Refund Check 013337-000, 15920 W STANISLAUS AVE 98.15
Refund Check 013337-000, 15920 W STANISLAUS AVE 0.03
Refund Check 013337-000, 15920 W STANISLAUS AVE 0.75
Refund Check 013337-000, 15920 W STANISLAUS AVE 0.16
14Total for Check Number 26587: 99.
202326588 UB*01657 GREGORIO VALDIVIA III 04/14/
Refund Check 015871-000, 799 S PARK AVE 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26588: 100.
202326589 UB*01656 VALLEY WEST PROPERTY 04/14/
Refund Check 018685-000, 454 S ALMOND AVE 0.10
Refund Check 018685-000, 454 S ALMOND AVE 222.91
15AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 27 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
01Total for Check Number 26589: 223.
91Total for 4/14/2023: 665.
202326590 12385 BEATRIZ ALEJANDRE 04/20/
00335568 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 04/11/2023 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26590: 100.
202326591 12257 AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP 04/20/
041123 HR- CLAIMS FUNDING ENDING 04/08/23 1,069.57
57Total for Check Number 26591: 1,069.
202326592 10040 AT&T MOBILITY 04/20/
287287978139X04 AC- MAR CELLULAR SERVICE 44.88
287287978139X04 PD- MAR CELLULAR SERVICE 411.46
34Total for Check Number 26592: 456.
202326593 11917 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES LLC 04/20/
BA_5186_2023 ADM- CDFA CRC KERMAN COMMUNITY RESILIENCE CENTER 2023 4,792.50 BA_5187_2023 ADM- HELEN PUTNAM- ANIMAL SHELTER 2023 1,384.00 BA_5188_2023 ADM- HELEN PUTNAM- TRINIS PARK 2023 1,519.00 BA_5189_2023 ADM- CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING COMMUNITY RES & HART 5,400.00 BA_5265_2023 ADM- KRM GRANT RESEARCH AND SUPPORT 2,100.00 50Total for Check Number 26593: 15,195.
202326594 10064 CAL VALLEY PRINTING 04/20/
39094 CC- COUNCIL LOGO SHIRTS 294.44
44Total for Check Number 26594: 294.
202326595 11633 FAVIOLA CARDENAS 04/20/
035310 CC- COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES- APRIL 60.00
00Total for Check Number 26595: 60.
202326596 12315 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA SPCA 04/20/
26729 AAC- 2 FERAL FELINE CASTRATION CASE 23-1005 & 1 PREVIOUSLY ALTER 120.00 26830 AAC- 1 FERAL FELINE CASTRATION CASE 23-1011 TNR GRANT 46.00 00Total for Check Number 26596: 166.
202326597 12383 CITY OF DEL REY OAKS 04/20/
200001839 MUNICIPAL CODE CLEAN UP SEMINAR 75.00
00Total for Check Number 26597: 75.
202326598 10452 CITY OF FRESNO WMD 04/20/
COK2303252 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 48.00
COK2303252 WTR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 30.00
COK2303252 SWR- WEEKLY LAB ANALYSIS 14.00
00Total for Check Number 26598: 92.
202326599 10104 COMCAST 04/20/
815550021014764 FIN- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES- 04/14/23-05/13/23 190.77 815550021026546 TECH- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES- 04/14/23-05/13/23 (SR CTR) 152.74 16AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 28 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
815550021026548 TECH- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES- 04/14/23-05/13/23 (COMM CTR) 152.74 25Total for Check Number 26599: 496.
202326600 11498 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT LLC04/ 20/ 168901399 PD- APR ETHERNET SERVICES 696.29
29Total for Check Number 26600: 696.
202326601 11874 CSG CONSULTANTS INC 04/20/
50511 BPO- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- PLAN CHECKS 25.75 HRS 2,523.50 50511 BPO- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- BLDG INSPECTOR 92 HRS 9,016.00 50552 BPO- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- BLDG ADMIN SERVICES PERMIT TECH 16 H 1,680.00 50Total for Check Number 26601: 13,219.
202326602 11382 DATA TICKET INC 04/20/
150249 PD- MAR PARKING ACTIVITY 220.35
35Total for Check Number 26602: 220.
202326603 10458 RAUL HERRERA ECN POLYGRAPH ANDINVESTIGATIONS04/ 20/ KERM-APR-2023 PD- PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLY: APPLICANT ORTEGA (CSO) 250.00 KERM-FEB-2023 PD-PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLY: APPLICANT J. CADENAS (CSO) J. ARREOLA 500.00 00Total for Check Number 26603: 750.
202326604 10572 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE 04/20/
17322480-81 PD- INTERVIEW & INTERROGATION OFC. BARRA OFC. CORONADO - APR 150.00 17323460-61 PD- TRAFFIC COLLISION INVESTIGATION OFC. CASTRO OFC. MOLINA- APR 372.00 00Total for Check Number 26604: 522.
202326605 10159 FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 04/20/
81060/81378 BPO- MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT PLACEWORKS 8,210.19 19Total for Check Number 26605: 8,210.
202326606 12379 GILL CHEVROLET 04/20/
1070 VE REP- SPARK PLUG WIRE SHIELD #1397 65.31
1071 VE REP- WHEEL SENSOR #1522 58.08
39Total for Check Number 26606: 123.
202326607 11358 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES04/20/
33825736 PD- RECORDS COPIER/FAXAGREEMENT # 003-1836642-000 280.56 33825738 WTR- LANIER MP C4504 PUBLIC WORKS 93.72
33825738 SWR- LANIER MP C4504 PUBLIC WORKS 93.72
00Total for Check Number 26607: 468.
202326608 12386 SAMANTHA GUTIERREZ 04/20/
00331920 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 04/08/23 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26608: 100.
202326609 11761 JOHN JANSONS 04/20/
041223 ADM- PARKING REIMBURSEMENT FOR CITY LEADERS SUMMIT 04/12/23 30.00 041323 ADM- PARKING REIMBURSEMENT FOR CITY LEADERS SUMMIT 04/13/23 30.00 00Total for Check Number 26609: 60.
202326610 10239 KERWEST INC 04/20/
17AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 29 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
23032 BPO- PUBLIC NOTICES/ADVERTISING 206.00
00Total for Check Number 26610: 206.
202326611 11096 LOZANO SMITH LLP 04/20/
2185519 ADM- ADMIN-HR PERSONNEL MATTER- 03/2023 620.00
00Total for Check Number 26611: 620.
202326612 10282 OFFICE DEPOT 04/20/
300502008001 ADM- HP PRINTER 316.02
300515633001 ADM- OFFICE SUPPLIES 171.70
300860749-1 BPO- OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.95
300860749-1 BPO- OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.94
301115893-001 BPO- OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.30
91Total for Check Number 26612: 654.
202326613 10289 P.G.& E. 04/20/
4055166878-9 LLD- MONTHLY SERVICE 02/28/23-03/28/23 2,488.01 7660122617-8 AC- MAR PG&E 1,567.63
8970493475-4 PARKS- KERCKHOFF PARK 03/10/23-04/07/23 8.87 51Total for Check Number 26613: 4,064.
202326614 12384 PATRICIA POLANCO 04/20/
00332804 CTC- PARK RENTAL 50.00
00332804 CTC- SH DEPOSIT- PARK RENTAL 100.00
00Total for Check Number 26614: 150.
202326615 12026 PRECISION CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 04/20/
28011 BPO- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- 21-009.8 CITY OF KERMAN BOYD PROJECT 1,367.50 28012 BPO- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- 21-009.4 CITY OF KERMAN MULTI-FAMILY 4,872.50 00Total for Check Number 26615: 6,240.
202326616 10309 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 04/20/
515855 PD- 1 RAL FOREND TUBE REPLACEMENT FOR REM SHOTGUN 47.64 64Total for Check Number 26616: 47.
202326617 10324 RIVERSIDE NURSERY & LANDSCAPE INC04/20/ 1634 MEDIANS- 40 LODGE POLES- GOLDENROD MEDIANS 194.36
1646 MEDIANS- PLANTS FOR MEDIANS 823.09
1647 MEDIANS- PLANTS & TREES FOR MEDIANS 280.84
29Total for Check Number 26617: 1,298.
202326618 11714 ROD CARSEY 04/20/
2304B BPO- PLAN CHECK FEES FOR 23-018- MARCH 55.00
00Total for Check Number 26618: 55.
202326619 10331 SEBASTIAN 04/20/
32924 ADM- SHORTEL TROUBLESHOOTING WAV FILE 1,161.25
25Total for Check Number 26619: 1,161.
202326620 12165 ARACELI SIERRA 04/20/
00333067 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 04/09/2023 100.00
18AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 30 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
00Total for Check Number 26620: 100.
202326621 10561 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 04/20/
IN-007161682 FIN- 1-HP COMPUTER AND 2 27" MONITORS FOR SHANNON 320.91 IN-007161682 FIN-E-WASTE 10.79
IN-007161682 FIN- 1-HP COMPUTER AND 2 27" MONITORS FOR SHANNON 937.03 73Total for Check Number 26621: 1,268.
202326622 10357 TAYLOR MADE IRRIGATION 04/20/
26233 MEDIANS- IRRIGATION FITTINGS 28.71
26467 WTR- WATER LINE REPAIR FITTINGS 28.56
27Total for Check Number 26622: 57.
202326623 10387 USA BLUE BOOK 04/20/
317554 WTR- STENNER PUMP 1,686.09
09Total for Check Number 26623: 1,686.
202326624 10413 YAMABE & HORN ENGINEERING INC 04/20/
48431 TRACT 6236 6,832.89
48432 SPR 19-04 OVERNITE TRUCK PARKING 1,268.18
48433 BWC INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 686.41
48434 TRACT 6293 4,245.00
48435 EASTSIDE COMMUNITY PARK 30,800.85
48436 TRACT 6302 3,143.75
48437 VINELAND AVE REHAB - CALIFORNIA TO KEARNEY 4,625.78 48437 VINELAND AVE REHAB - CALIFORNIA TO KEARNEY 599.32 48438 KEARNEY BLVD REHABILITATION- PARK TO DEL NORTE 418.46 48438 KEARNEY BLVD REHABILITATION- PARK TO DEL NORTE 3,229.79 48439 STANISLAUS/ SAN JOAQUIN ALLEY PAVING- 1ST TO 3RD 984.53 48439 STANISLAUS/ SAN JOAQUIN ALLEY PAVING- 1ST TO 3RD 667.47 48440 WELL NO 12 & 14 EMERGENCY GENERATORS 1,376.25
48441 NORTHWEST PARK 1,265.00
48442 LIONS PARK RECHARGE PROJECT 1,845.00
48443 FY 21-22 STREET SEALING PROJECT 760.00
48444 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING 1,950.00
48445 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING-STREETS 1,440.00
48446 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING-WATER 360.00
48447 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING-WATER OPERATIONS 3,400.00 48448 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING-SEWER OPERATIONS 3,400.00 48449 FY 22-23 GENERAL ENGINEERING-GIS MAINTENANCE 890.00 48450 TPM 2022-01 SHAKTI 3,101.25
48451 SCHAAD TTM 77.50
48452 SISKIYOU AVE REHABILITATION - WHITESBRIDGE TO KEARNEY 927.27 48452 SISKIYOU AVE REHABILITATION - WHITESBRIDGE TO KEARNEY 7,156.95 48453 GOLDENROD AVE REHABILITATION- KEARNEY TO SJVRR 537.72 48453 GOLDENROD AVE REHABILITATION- KEARNEY TO SJVRR 4,150.28 48454 CALIFORNIAAVE SIDEWALK- 9TH TO VINELAND 4,351.03
48454 CALIFORNIAAVE SIDEWALK- 9TH TO VINELAND 563.73
48455 SPR 2022-01 IRON FITNESS 232.50
91Total for Check Number 26624: 95,286.
42Total for 4/20/2023: 155,271.
19AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 31 Section 5, Item C.
Check No NameVendor No DateVendor Check Check Amount
Invoice No ReferenceDescription
Report Total (148 checks): 816,678.54
20AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (4/21/2023 11:14 AM) Page 32 Section 5, Item C.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: Jerry Jones, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 (JJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution to initiate proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 and authorize the City Engineer to file his annual report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Landscape and Lighting District (LLD) No. 1 maintains public landscaping in median islands and landscape strips along major streets. The revenue from the district also pays for street lighting costs for areas within the LLD. All new developments are annexed into the LLD and charged an annual assessment that is collected with property taxes. There are currently 13 subareas within the LLD.
This is the first of three actions by Council required by State law for the levy of the annual assessments. Following this action, the City Engineer will prepare a report, detailing the proposed assessments, that will be submitted to the Council for review and approval. The next action required by Council will be the approval of the resolution of intention to levy and collect the annual assessments, which will set the date for the public hearing required prior to the confirmation of assessments. The final step in the process is for Council toconduct the required public hearing, receive any testimony, and confirm the annual assessments. The assessment roll is then submitted to the County Assessor for inclusion on the property owner’s tax bill. No new annexations took place this past year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The annual assessments from the LLD are used for maintenance of public landscaping and street lighting. Last year the total assessments were $355,503.98.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution
33 Section 5, Item D.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN, CALIFORNIA,
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF KERMAN WHEREAS, the Council has approved no new annexations to Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 of the City of Kerman (herein LLD No. 1) during the period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 inclusive; and
WHEREAS, proceedings for the annual assessment for LLD No. 1 for the fiscal year 2023-2024 need to be initiated.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED as follows:
1. The Council proposes to undertake proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment of LLD No. 1 under Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California Section 22500 et seq.) generally known as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Herein the “Act”).
2. The City Engineer shall prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of the Act.
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kerman held on the 26th day of April, 2023, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
34 Section 5, Item D.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: John Jansons, City Manager
SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services with Montoy Law Corporation (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution approving Amendment No. 2 Agreement for Legal Services with Montoy Law Corporation adjusting rates.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Kerman has contracted with the Montoy Law Corporation since 2015 to provide the City with municipal legal services. Since that time, the Firm rates have been adjusted once in 2019. Ms. Montoy has requested a new adjustment effective July 1, 2023.
The resolution attached would approve Amendment No. 2 to the contract for services and increase rates and fees charged to the City of Kerman for legal services.
The proposed new rates are competitive in our geographic region and reasonable to keep pace with rising costs experienced by firms who serve the City. See comparable rates under Discussion.
DISCUSSION: The City of Kerman has contracted with the Montoy Law Corporation since 2015 to provide the City with municipal legal services. Since that time, Montoy rates have been adjusted once in 2021. The resolution attached, would approve Amendment No. 2 to the contract for services and increase rates charged to the City of Kerman for legal services. Rates for general services would be increased from $195 to $215 and rates for litigation would be increased from $235 to $260.00
The proposed rates are competitive in our geographic region and reasonable to keep pace with rising costs. For example, the proposed $215 rate for general services is still less than the rates for general legal services for surrounding cities as reflected below:
Avenal: $ 225.00
Clovis: $ 235.00
Chowchilla $ 240.00
Coalinga $ 265.00
Corcoran $ 245.00
Del Rey CSD $ 250.00
Madera $ 235.00
35 Section 5, Item E.
FISCAL IMPACT: As stated, the Firm has not increased rates since 2021 to account for the rising costs of doing business and in recognition of the City’s limited resources available for legal services. The primary hourly fee charged to the City for general legal services will increase from 195/hr. to $215/ hr. The proposed amendment, Exhibit ‘ A’ to the Resolution, details the increased rates which average approximately 10% above the 2021 rates currently in effect.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution w/Exhibit
36 Section 5, Item E.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES
WITH MONTOY LAW CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the City of Kerman requires competent and professional municipal legal services and advice; and
WHEREAS, the Montoy Law Corporation (Firm) has served the City since 2015 as contract City Attorney and both parties wish to continue this relationship; and WHEREAS, Firm did not request a rate increase until 2021 to account for their rising costs of doing business and in recognition of City’s financial situation in particular years; and WHEREAS, another rate increase is warranted to keep pace with recent inflation and increased costs of doing business, and the requested increase is modest at only 10%; and WHEREAS, the City deems the proposed increases reasonable and appropriate in the marketplace and a continuance of good value for competent and professional legal services; and WHEREAS, Firm furtherrepresents that it is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Amendment No. 2 to Agreement
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Kerman resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council approves Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Legal Services with Montoy Law Corporation (Exhibit ‘A’).
SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to execute the Amendment.
SECTION 4. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption.
The foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Kerman at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of April 2023, by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
37 Section 5, Item E.
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
38 Section 5, Item E.
B. Hilda Cantu Montoy has served as City Attorney to City under the Agreement.
C. Firm has the legal competence, experience, and qualifications to provide professional legal services required by City.
D. The parties have determined to set new rates for legal services as set forth in this Amendment No. 2 to Agreement (“ Amendment”).
AGREEMENT
1. Section 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
3. Compensation. CITY shall compensate FIRM for legal services as follows:
3.1 General Services Attorney Rate: $215.00 Hourly.
3.1.1 General Services shall include all legal services except Pitchess Motions, Administrative Hearings, and Litigation.
3.1.2 Examples of General Services include: staff meetings, advisory services, agenda review, drafting/negotiating contracts, drafting/reviewing correspondence, documents, resolutions, and ordinances, research, and preparation of legal memoranda.
3.1.3 No travel time will be charged to attend meetings at Kerman City Hall or in the City of Kerman.
3.2 Administrative Hearings and Litigation Attorney Rate: $260.00 Hourly.
3.3 Rate for Paralegal Work: $90.00 Hourly.
3.4 Administrative Fees: NONE.
Exhibit 'A'
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
The City of Kerman (“ City”) and Montoy Law Corporation (“ Firm”) agree to enter into Amendment No. 2 to Legal Services Agreement as follows:
RECITALS
A. The City and Firm entered into a Legal Services Agreement (“ Agreement”) on July 1, 2015, for City Attorney legal services.
39 Section 5, Item E.
3.5 Reimbursement:
3.5.1 FIRM will not be reimbursed for any secretarial or clerical service, mileage reimbursement, printing expense of less than 500 pages per particular item, or normal office operating expenses except as set forth in the next paragraph of this Agreement.
3.5.2 FIRM will be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary out-ofpocket expenses directly related to legal services such as required courier charges and extraordinary copying or printing expenses over 300 pages per particular item), and expenses relating to litigation in accordance with Exhibit A of Agreement and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
3. This Amendment No. 1 shall be effective on July 1, 2023.
MONTOY LAW CORPORATION
Hilda Cantú Montoy
President
Date: _________________, 2023
CITY OF KERMAN
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
Date: _______________, 2023
40 Section 5, Item E.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: Jesus R. Orozco, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) ABC License for Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) Located at 14195 W Whitesbridge Rd. (JRO) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion, review and consider adoption of a Resolution Adopting Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) ABC License for Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) Located at 14195 W Whitesbridge Rd. Which Has Received a Conditional Use Permit by the City’s Planning Commission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request for Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) for a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) ABC license was presented at the February 22, 2023, City Council (Council) meeting.
The Council determined to table the matter as there were only three Council Members present. The PCN request was submitted by Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) located at 14195 W.
Whitesbridge Rd. The subject site is in undue concentrated Census Tract 40.06. As a result of the undue concentration of ABC licenses in this census tract, under section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code, the Council must determine within 90 days of notification of a completed application that a PCN would be served by the issuance of the ABC license. Because a pending alcohol CUP was pending before the Planning Commission (Commission), the PCN request was placed on hold. The Planning Commission (Commission) held a public hearing on April 10, 2023, and adopted Resolution No. 2023-023 (see Attachment ‘C’) approving the Alcohol CUP. The Commission resolution includes the required findings for approval consistent with Ordinance No. 23 -01 as well as 30 conditions of approval. Fast N Esy.
DISCUSSION: Project Proposal Applicants Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra wish to include the sale of beer and wine as a component of a convenience store to be developed in association with a 24-hour fueling station and a drive-through restaurant. Alcohol sales will only be sold out of the convenience store. Before an ABC license is issued by the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control, the Council must first determine by making findings that ABC sales would serve a public convenience or necessity (PCN). The Commission’s approval of CUP 2023-03, is subject to a number of conditions and allows for the sale of beer and wine between the hours of 6 AM and 1 AM.
Council Policy
Historically, the Council considered PCN requests for convenience stores on a case-by-case basis. The case-by-case basis approach was determined to be non-objective by Council. In order to address concerns regarding an objective review of PCN and ABC sales, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 23- 01, requiring all new and expansion of alcohol sales to procure a CUP. Additionally, specific distance restrictions were imposed as part of the CUP review and consideration process. The applicant has completed the CUP process as required by the ordinance. The Commission approved CUP 2023-03 for Fast N Esy with the understanding the Council must make a PCN determination. 41 Section 7, Item A.
Census Tract 40.06
As already mentioned in this report, there is an undue concentration of ABC sales within Census Tract
40.06. Census Tract 40.06 encompasses properties north of Kearney Blvd., well beyond city limits and properties east of Madera Ave, well beyond city limits as shown in Attachment ‘B’. At this time there are eight (8) Off-sale ABC licenses where only two (2) Off-sale ABC licenses are allowed in the census tract. Approval of this PCN would result in nine (9) Off-sale ABC licenses. The next closest ABC sales site is located within the Wal-Mart shopping center, which currently holds a Type 21 ( Off-sale General). Of note, one of the eight (8) Off-sale ABC license’s is located outside the City’s sphere of influence.
The table shows all active ABC licenses in Census Tract 40.06.
Census Tract 40.06
Sale
Type
Lic.
Type
Orig. Iss.
Date
Expir.
Date Primary Owner Premises Addr. Business Name
Onsale 415/31/20
06 4/30/20
23 GONG, HUI ZHI 160 S MADERA AVE
HONG KONG
RESTAURANT
Offsale 215/24/20
10 6/30/20
23 THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. 456 S MADERA AVE RITE AID 5853 Offsale 2110/1/20
09 9/30/20
23 MAHLI & SAMRA
INCORPORATED 432 S MADERA AVE FASTRIP 918
Offsale 2112/4/20
13 6/30/20
23 WALMART INC.
14061 W
WHITESBRIDGE RD WALMART 5701
Offsale 202/12/20
16 6/30/20
23 CHAHAL
MANAGEMENT INC 240 S MADERA AVE
KERMAN U SAVE
MINI MART
Offsale 2010/15/2
019
9/30/20
23 R& S DIVERSIFIED, INC.
14980 W
WHITESBRIDGE AVE KERMAN CARNITAS
Offsale 2011/13/2
020
10/31/2
023
RASHED, YAHYA
ABDULKARIM
1048 N MADERA
AVE HWY 145 MARKET
Offsale 204/22/20
21 6/30/20
23 GROCERY OUTLET INC
14868 W
WHITESBRIDGE RD GROCERY OUTLET
Offsale 2111/29/2
022
10/31/2
023 DB KERMAN INC
14859 W
WHITESBRIDGE AVE
KERMAN
FOODMART
Onsale47
77 1/26/20
23 12/31/2
023
ALONSO
CORPORATION 170 N MADERA AVE CEVICHES & BEER
Findings
In considering a Type 20 (Off-sale Beer and Wine) ABC license, the Council must determine that the request is warranted by a PCN, and Council must make a determination on whether or not a PCN would be served by the issuance of an off-sale ABC license prior to the issuance of a license by the State’s Department of Alcohol Beverage Control.
To that end, applicants Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) have submitted an application for a CUP and SPR in order to ensure compliance with the recently adopted ordinance related ABC sales.
Moreover, ABC sales are generally incidental to convenience stores with fueling stations which is a permitted use in commercial zone districts. At this time, staff has not been in receipt of any comments in favor or against the ABC license application due to the mandatory notice of application posted on the site.
42 Section 7, Item A.
Additional, the General Plan includes numerous goals and policies intended to help guide economic and community development in the City. The following policies directly or indirectly support findings for a public convenience or necessity.
Policy ED – 1.1 Increase Business. The City shall strive to increase the number of businesses operating in Kerman to satisfy the routine needs and dining, services, and retail desires of residents while also increasing sales, property, business, and potential transient -occupancy taxes.
Policy ED – 3.2 Expanding Operations and Employment. The City shall assist existing industries in expanding their operations and increasing employment in Kerman to reduce commutes.
Policy ED – 3.4 Attracting Industries for Local Jobs. The City shall seek industries that complement the existing workforce in terms of educational and vocational skills set and commute patterns, and will provide full-time, stable employment with competitive wages and benefits.
CEQA: The proposed project is a commercial project pursuant to and in conformity with the Kerman 2040 General Plan. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, a project that is consistent with a general plan required no further environmental review since it is consistent with the development density established by the 2040 General Plan for which an EIR was certified. There are no projectspecific significant effects on the project or the site which would require additional environmental review. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Council find the project exempt from further review under CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution
B. Census Tract 40.06 Map
C. Planning Commission Resolution
43 Section 7, Item A.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF KERMAN CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE ABC LICENSE FOR VIKRAM VOHRA AND VINAY VOHRA (FAST N ESY) LOCATED AT 14195 W. WHITESBRIDGE ROAD WHICH HAS
RECEIVED AN ALCOHOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, on January 23, 2023, the Community Development Department received a complete application for a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) request regarding an application for a Type 20 Off-Sale Beer & Wine) alcohol license (ABC license), from Vikram Vohra and Vinay Vohra (Fast N Esy) located at 14195 W Whitesbridge Rd.; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control has determined that there is an undue concentration of off-sale ABC licenses in Census Tract 40.06 in which Fast N Esy wishes to establish ABC sales; and
WHEREAS, a Public Convenience or Necessity ( PCN ) determination is required when the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of the State of California ( ABC ) finds that there is an oversaturation of alcohol beverage outlets in a particular census tract; and.
WHEREAS, the City Council is the City’s governing body and has the ability to make a determination of public convenience or necessity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance requiring all new ABC licenses to procure a Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kerman Planning Commission has held a public hearing to review and consider a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for Fast N Esy; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made the requisite findings required by Ordinance No. 23-01 for approval for Conditional Use Permit 2023-03 and has approved the CUP subject to conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2023 the City Council considered the request for public convenience or necessity. makes findings of public convenience or necessity for a Type 20 Off -Sale Beer & Wine alcohol license; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Kerman resolves as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
2. The City Council hereby determines that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of a Type 20 ABC Off-Sale Beer and Wine alcohol license to Fast 44 Section 7, Item A.
N Esy located at 14195 W. Whitesbridge Rd. in the City of Kerman. The Council’s determination is based on the following findings:
a. The sale of beer and wine would serve the public convenience as Fast N Esy has successfully procured an Alcohol Conditional Use Permit as required by Ordinance 23-02. Additionally, the CUP is subject to numerous health and safety conditions.
b. Alcohol sales are an incidental activity within convenience stores with fueling stations which is a permitted use in commercial zone districts. c. The proposed use would stimulate economic activity by generating sales tax revenues, full- and part-time jobs while guiding community and economic goals and policies of the General Plan.
d. Staff has not been in receipt of any comments in favor or against the ABC license application being issued as a result of the mandatory notice of application posted on the site.
3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or his designee to submit a letter to ABC advising it of the Council’s adoption of this Resolution to allow for the issuance of a Type 20 ABC license.
4. This resolution is effective upon adoption.
The foregoing resolution was approved by the City Council of the City of Kerman at a regular meeting held on the 26th of April 2023, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSAL:
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
45 Section 7, Item A.
Attachment ‘B’
46 Section 7, Item A.
Attachment 'C'
47 Section 7, Item A.
48 Section 7, Item A.
49 Section 7, Item A.
50 Section 7, Item A.
51 Section 7, Item A.
52 Section 7, Item A.
53 Section 7, Item A.
54 Section 7, Item A.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: Jerry Jones, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Stanislaus/San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031) to Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez. (JJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution awarding the contract for the Stanislaus/ San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031), to Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez in the amount of $108,444.00 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Stanislaus/ San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031), will consist of the paving of the alley between Stanislaus Avenue and San Joaquin Avenue, from 1st to 3rd Street. The Project will also include new concrete alley approaches with an ADA accesible path of travel around the approaches. The Project was advertised and bids were received from thirteen contractors on Wednesday, March 1, 2023 and the results are as follows:
Contractor Base Bid
Tosted Asphalt Inc. $ 105,786.82
Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez $ 108,444.00
Central Valley Asphalt $ 115,125.00
On Point Grading & Paving, Inc. $ 120,924.00
Avison Construction, Inc. $ 125,865.00
Cal Valley Construction, Inc. $ 127,676.00
Witbro Inc., dba Seal Rite Paving & Grading $ 127,750.00 Bush Engineering, Inc. $ 131,592.00
R.J. Berry Jr., Inc. $ 139,206.00
Emmett Valley Construction, Inc. $ 147,957.00
Jim Crawford Construction Co., Inc. $ 168,544.00
Garcia Paving, Inc. $ 181,488.18
Dawson-Mauldin, LLC $ 192,685.00
Engineer’s Estimate $ 106,000.00
55 Section 7, Item B.
This Project is being funded in part by Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement ( CMAQ) program funds. As a requirement of this funding, the City must establish a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ( DBE) participation goal that bidders must meet, or bidders must demonstrate that they made a Good Faith Effort (GFE) in attempting to meet the established DBE goal. The DBE goal for this Project was 11%. The bid submitted by Tosted Asphalt committed to DBE participation in the amount of 6%. Since they did not meet the DBE goal, they are required to provide evidence that they made a GFE to try and meet the goal. Staff reviewed the GFE documentation submitted by Tosted Asphalt, and determined that the GFE made was not sufficient to comply with the requirements of the CMAQ funding. As such, Staff has determined that the bid submitted by Tosted Asphalt is non - responsive.
Due to the fact that bid submitted by Tosted Asphalt was deemed non-responsive, Staff reviewed the second lowest bid, submitted by Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez, along with information regarding their previous work experience. Asphalt Design has committed to DBE participtaion in the amount of 22%, exceeding the goal of 11%. Based on review, Staff has determined the bid received to be responsive and Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez to be a responsible contractor.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total estimated Project cost is $ 163,681, including design, construction, construction management, and contingency. The Project will be funded with $133,149 in Federal CMAQ funds and $30,532 from Local Transportation Funds. The Local Transportation Funds budgeted for the Project were in the amount of $17,683. The additional $12,849 needed to fund the Project is available from Local Transportation Funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution
56 Section 7, Item B.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE STANISLAUS/SAN JOAQUIN ALLEY PAVING FROM 1ST TO 3RD STREET, FEDERAL PROJECT NO. CML-5291(031), TO ASPHALT DESIGN BY JUAN GOMEZ WHEREAS, the Invitation to Bid for the Stanislaus/San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031), was published in the Kerman News on February 1, 2023 and was sent electronically and mailed to all construction trade journals specified for the City by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with the City’s Formal Contract Procedures and California Public Contract Code Section 22037 and;
WHEREAS, the Project consists of the paving of the alley between Stanislaus Avenue and San Joaquin Avenue, from 1st to 3rd Street, within the City of Kerman; and WHEREAS, the following bids for the Project were publicly opened and read aloud at the Kerman City Hall on March 1, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.:
Contractor Base Bid
Tosted Asphalt Inc. $ 105,786.82
Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez $ 108,444.00
Central Valley Asphalt $ 115,125.00
On Point Grading & Paving, Inc. $ 120,924.00
Avison Construction, Inc. $ 125,865.00
Cal Valley Construction, Inc. $ 127,676.00
Witbro Inc., dba Seal Rite Paving & Grading $ 127,750.00 Bush Engineering, Inc. $ 131,592.00
R.J. Berry Jr., Inc. $ 139,206.00
Emmett Valley Construction, Inc. $ 147,957.00
Jim Crawford Construction Co., Inc. $ 168,544.00
Garcia Paving, Inc. $ 181,488.18
Dawson-Mauldin, LLC $ 192,685.00
57 Section 7, Item B.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer’s Estimate was $106,000.00 for the Base Bid; and WHEREAS, the Project is being funded in part with Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program funds and as a requirement of the CMAQ program funds bidders must meet the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ( DBE) participation percentage goal established by the City or demonstrate that they made a Good Faith Effort (GFE) in attempting to meet said goal; and WHEREAS, the bid submitted by Tosted Asphalt Inc. did not meet the DBE goal and furthermore did not provide sufficient evidence that Tosted Asphalt Inc. made a satisfactory GFE in an attempt to meet the DBE goal and as such the bid submitted by Tosted Asphalt Inc. is deemed non-responsive.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1. Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer, the Stanislaus/San Joaquin Alley Paving from 1st to 3rd Street, Federal Project No. CML-5291(031), be awarded to: Asphalt Design By Juan Gomez, 4061 W. Belmont Ave., Fresno, CA 93722 in the amount of One Hundred and Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Forty-Four Dollars and Zero Cents ($108,444.00).
2. The City Manager is authorized to sign the City's standard form of agreement for construction projects, as contained in the bid package on behalf of the City of Kerman.
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kerman held on the 26th day of April, 2023, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
58 Section 7, Item B.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: John Jansons, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of Opposition to Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act as proposed by the California Business Roundtable (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution opposing Initiative No. 2-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act as proposed by the California Business Roundtable.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act would amend the California Constitution with provisions that limit voters’ authority and input, adopt new and stricter rules for raising taxes and fees, and may make it more difficult to impose fines and penalties for violation of state and local laws.
The proposed constitutional initiative is sponsored by the California Business Roundtable. The measure puts billions of local government tax and fee revenues at risk statewide with related core public service impacts. The measure would have significant negative impacts on Kerman operations and core service delivery.
The impact of passage of Initiative No. 21-0042A1 to Kerman is potentially devastating due to reduced fee revenues, increased legal defense costs, invalidation of taxes or future reduction of tax revenues and delayed annexations and development potentially costing the City millions of dollars and dramatically reducing or eliminating the City’s ability to provide basic, core municipal services to residents, businesses and visitors. Most negatively impacted immediately would be Public Safety, Infrastructure and Parks and Recreation programs.
DISCUSSION: On Jan. 4, 2022, the California Business Roundtable filed the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act or AG# 21-0042A1 (Exhibit ‘ A’). On Feb. 1, 2023, the measure qualified for the November 2024 ballot.
The League of California Cities, along with a broad coalition of local governments, labor and public safety leaders, infrastructure advocates, and businesses, strongly opposes this initiative.
A summary of the negative impacts to local governments, including Kerman, is summarized in Exhibit ‘B’,
Local government revenue-raising authority is currently substantially restricted by state statute and constitutional provisions, including the voter approved provisions of Proposition 13 of 1978, Proposition 218 of 1996, and Proposition 26 of 2010. The Taxpayer Protection and 59 Section 7, Item C.
Government Accountability Act adds and expands restrictions on voters and local government tax and fee authority.
MAJOR PROVISIONS
Fees and Charges
Except for licensing and other regulatory fees, fees and charges may not exceed the actual cost” of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. “Actual cost” is the “minimum amount necessary.” The burden to prove the fee or charge does not exceed “actual cost” is changed to “clear and convincing” evidence.
Requires fees and charges paid for the use of local and state government property and the amount paid to purchase or rent government property to be “reasonable.” These fees and charges are currently allowed to be market-based. Whether the amount is reasonable” ( introducing a new legal standard aiming to force below market fee and charge amounts) must be proved by “clear and convincing evidence.” 1The standard may significantly reduce the amount large companies ( e.g., oil, utilities, gas, railroads, garbage/refuse, cable, and other corporations) will pay for the use of local public property.
Prohibits fees on new development based on vehicle miles traveled.
Local governments levy a variety of fees and other charges toprovide core public services.
Major examples of affected fees and charges are:
Nuisance abatement charges, such as for weed, rubbish, and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs.
Commercial franchise fees.
Emergency response fees, such as in connection with DUI.
Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport charges.
Document processing and duplication fees.
Transit fees, tolls, parking fees, and public airport and harbor use fees.
Facility use charges, fees for parks and recreation services, garbage disposal tipping fees.
Taxes2:
Taxes and fees adopted after Jan. 1, 2022, that do not comply with the new rules, are void unless reenacted3.
1 Initiative No. 21-0042A1 (pg.5; (3))
2 Initiative No. 21-0042A1 (pgs.4-6; Section 1 (a)-(j)
3 Initiative No. 21-0042A1 (pg.7; Section 6 (Sec. 2)(g) 60 Section 7, Item C.
Invalidates Upland decision that allows a majority of local voters to pass special taxes. The measure specifies that taxes proposed by the initiative are subject to the same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council.
Expressly prohibits local advisory measures which allow local voters to express a preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent.4 Requires voter approval to expand existing taxes (e.g., Utility, Transient Occupancy) to new territory (e.g., annexations) or to expand the tax base (e.g., new utility service) New taxes can only be imposed for a specific time period.
City charters may not be amended to include a tax or fee.
All state taxes require majority voter approval.
Fines and Penalties5:
May require voter approval of fines, penalties, and levies for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties.
Under existing law, cities are required to provide due process before imposing a penalty or fine for violation of its municipal code:
1. A local agency must adopt administrative procedures that govern imposing fines and penalties, including providing a reasonable period of time for a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or remedy the violation [Gov't Code 53069.4].
2. Notice must be given to the violating party before imposing the penalty; and give the party an opportunity to be heard and present any facts or arguments [Merco Construction Engineers v. Los Angeles Unified School District (1969) 274 CA 2d 154, 166].
3. The fine may not be "excessive" [ U.S. Constitution amendments VIII and XIV].
Fees Provide Local Services:
Virtually every city, county, and special district must regularly ( e.g., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and charges and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies, including council-adopted increases to simply accommodate inflation, Cal Cities estimates the amount of local government fee and charge revenue at risk is approximately $2 billion per year including those adopted since Jan. 1, 2022. Over ten years, $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues will be at heightened legal peril. 4 Initiative No. 21-0042A1 (pg.6 (3))
5 Initiative No. 21-0042A1 (pg. 5 (4))
61 Section 7, Item C.
Hundreds of local tax measures were approved in 20226 that likely do not comply with the provisions of the initiative. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter-approved measures will cease a year after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures, unless the tax is re-submitted for voter approval.
Reductions on local government tax revenues have impacts on core services and infrastructure including fire and emergency response, law enforcement, streets and roads, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, public schools, affordable housing, homelessness prevention, and mental health services.
The initiative converts administratively-imposed fines and penalties into taxes unless a new, undefined, and ambiguous “ adjudicatory due process” is followed.
This provision may put at risk authority to impose fines and penalties for violations of state and local law.
FISCAL IMPACT: As detailed in Exhibit ‘ C’, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act will take billions of dollars away from local government services statewide.
Most negatively impacted immediately would be Public Safety, Infrastructure and Parks and Recreation programs.
Costs to Kerman would include: reduced fee revenues, increased legal defense costs, invalidation of taxes or future reduction of tax revenues and delayed annexations and development potentially costing the City millions of dollars and dramatically reducing or eliminating the City’s ability to provide basic, core municipal services to residents, businesses and visitors.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution w/Exhibits
Electronic Link to Full text of Ballot Initiative:
https:// oag.ca.gov/ system/files/initiatives/pdfs/21-0042A1%20%28Taxes%29.pdf 6 http://www.californiacityfinance.com/Votes2211final.pdf 62 Section 7, Item C.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23- ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN
OPPOSING 2024 INITIATIVE 21-0042A1, THE TAXPAYER PROTECTION AND GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT AS PROPOSED BY THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE WHEREAS, an association representing California’s wealthiest corporations and developers is spending millions to push a deceptive proposition aimed for the November 2024 statewide ballot; and
WHEREAS, the measure includes undemocratic provisions that would make it more difficult for local voters to pass measures needed to fund local services and infrastructure, and would limit voter input by prohibiting local advisory measures where voters provide direction on how they want their local tax dollars spent; and
WHEREAS, the measure creates new constitutional loopholes that allow corporations to pay far less than their fair share for the impacts they have on our communities, including local infrastructure and our environment; and
WHEREAS, the measure may make it much more difficult for state and local regulators to issue fines and levies on corporations that violate laws intended to protect our environment, public health and safety, and our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the measure puts billions of dollars Statewide and millions currently dedicated to local services provided by the City of Kerman at risk and could force cuts to law enforcement, fire and emergency response, parks, libraries, affordable housing, and health services.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Kerman resolves as follows:
Section 1. The recitals above and true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The City of Kerman opposes Initiative 21-0042A1.
Section 3. The City of Kerman will join the No on Initiative 21 -0042A1 coalition, a growing coalition of public safety, education, labor, local government, and infrastructure groups throughout the state.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to email a copy of this adopted Resolution to the League of California Cities.
Section 5. This Resolution is effective immediately.
63 Section 7, Item C.
The foregoing resolution was considered by the City Council to the City of Kerman at a regular meeting of said Council held on April 26, 2023 adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
64 Section 7, Item C.
BELL, McANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP
Anabel Renteria
Initiative Coordinator
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSEL-ORS AT I.AW
455 C APITO L MALL, S UITE 600
SACRAMENTO, CALIFOE=INIA 95014
916) 44;a-7757
FAX [ 916) 44-;a-77 59
www.bmhlaw.com
January 4, 2022
2 1 - 0 0 4 2
RECEIVED
JAN O4 2022
Office ofthe Attorney General
State of California
INITIATIVE COORDINATOR
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
PO Box 994255
Sacramento, CA94244-25550
Re: Initiative 21-0042 - Amendment NumberOne
DearInitiative Coordinator:
Pursuant to subdivision (b) ofSection 9002 of the Elections Code, enclosed please find Amendment # 1 to Initiative No. 21-0042 " The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act." The amendments are reasonably germane to the theme, purposeor subject ofthe initiative measure as originally proposed.
I am the proponent of the measure and request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary of the measure as provided by law, using the amended language.
Thank youfor yourtimeand attention processing my request.
Sincerely,
ThomasW. Hiltachk
Exhibit 'A'
65 Section 7, Item C.
2 1 - 0 0 4 2 Arndt. # /
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act Deleted codified text is denoted in strikeout. Added codified text is denoted by italics and underline.] Section 1. Title
This Act shall be known, and may be cited as, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.
Section 2. Findings and Declarations
a) Californians are overtaxed. We pay the nation's highest state income tax, sales tax, and gasoline tax. According tothe U.S. Census Bureau, California's combined state and local tax burden is the highest in the nation. Despite this, and despite two consecutive years of obscene revenue surpluses, state politicians in 2021 alone introduced legislation to raise more than $234 billion in new and higher taxes and fees.
b) Taxes are only part of the reason for California's rising cost-of-living crisis. Californians pay billions more in hidden "fees" passed through to consumers in the price they pay for products, services, food, fuel, utilities and housing. Since 2010, government revenue from state and local "fees" has more than doubled.
c) California's high cost of living not only contributes to the state's skyrocketing rates of poverty and homelessness, they are the pushing working families and job-providing businesses out ofthe state. The most recent Census showed that California's population dropped forthefirst time in history, costing us a seat in Congress. In the past four years, nearly 300 major corporations relocated to other states, not counting thousands more small businesses that were forced to move, sell or close. d) California voters have tried repeatedly, atgreatexpense, to assert control overwhetherand howtaxes and fees are raised. We have enacted a series ofmeasures to make taxes more predictable, to limitwhat passes as a "fee," to require voter approval, and to guarantee transparency and accountability. These measures include Proposition 13 (1978), Proposition 62 (1986), Proposition 218 (1996), and Proposition 26 (2010).
e) Contrary to the voters' intent, these measures that were designed to control taxes, spending and accountability, have been weakened and hamstrung by the Legislature, government lawyers, and the courts, making it necessary to pass yet another initiative to close loopholes and reverse hostile court decisions.
Section 3. StatementofPurpose
a) In enacting this measure, the voters reassert theirrightto a voice and a vote on newand higher taxes by requiring any new or higher tax to be put before voters for approval. Voters also intend that all fees and other charges are passed orrejected by the voters themselves or a governing body elected by voters and not unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
b) Furthermore, the purpose and intentofthevoters in enacting thismeasure is to increase transparency and accountability over higher taxes and charges by requiring any tax measure placed on the ballot1 66 Section 7, Item C.
eitheratthe stateorlocal level-to clearly state the type and rate ofany tax, how long itwill be in effect, and the use ofthe revenue generated by the tax.
c) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of thevoters in enacting this measure is to clarify that any new or increased form of state government revenue, by any name or manner ofextraction paid directly or indirectly by Californians, shall be authorized only by a vote of the Legislature and signature of the Governorto ensure thatthe purposes forsuch charges are broadly supported and transparently debated. d) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is also to ensure that taxpayers have the right and abilityto effectively balance newor increased taxes and othercharges with the rapidly increasing costs Californians are already paying for housing, food, childcare, gasoline, energy, healthcare, education, and other basic costs of living, and to further protect the existing constitutional limit on property taxes and ensure that the revenue from such taxes remains local, without changing or superseding existing constitutional provisions contained inSection 1{c) ofArticle XIII A. e) In enactingthismeasure, the votersalso additionallyintendto reverse loopholesinthe legislative twothirds vote and voter approval requirements for government revenue increases created by the courts including, but not limited to, Cannabis Coalition v. CityofUpland, ChamberofCommerce v. AirResources Board, Schmeer v. Los Angeles County, Johnson v. County ofMendocino, Citizens Assn. ofSunset Beach v.
Orange CountyLocalAgency Formation Commission, and Wilde v. CityofDunsmuir.
Section 4. Section 3 ofArticle XIII A ofthe California Constitution is amended to read:
Sec. 3(a} Every levy, charge. orexaction ofany kind imposed by state law is either a tax or an exempt charge.
illlJ1l ~ Any change in state statute Jaw which results in any taxpayer paying a new or higher tax must be imposed byan act passed by not less thantwo-thirdsofall memberselected to each ofthetwohouses ofthe Legislature, andsubmitted to the electorate andapproved bya maiority vote, exceptthat no new ad valorem taxes on real property, or sales ortransaction taxes on the sales of real property, may be imposed. Each Actshall include:
A) Aspecific duration oftime thatthe tax willbe imposed andan estimateofthe annualamountexpected tobe derived from the tax.
BJ A specific and legally bindingandenforceable limitation on howtherevenue from the taxcan be spent.
Ifthe revenue from the taxcan be spent forunrestricted general revenue purposes. then a statementthat the tax revenue can be spent for "unrestricted general revenue purposes " shall be included in a separate, stand-alone section . Any proposed change to the use ofthe revenue from the tax shall be adopted by a separate act that is passed by notless than two-thirds ofall members elected to each ofthe two houses ofthe Legislature andsubmittedto the electorate and approved by a maiority vote. 2) The title and summary and ballot label or question required for a measure pursuant to the Elections Code shall. for each measure providing for the imposition ofa tax, including a measure proposed by an elector pursuant toArticle II, include:
A) The type andamountorrate ofthe tax;
BJ The duration ofthe tax: and
2 67
Section 7, Item C.
CJ The use ofthe revenue derived from the tax.
c} Anychange in state law which results in any taxpayer paying a new orhigherexempt charge mustbe imposed by an actpassed byeach ofthe two houses ofthe Legislature. Each actshall specify the type of exemptcharge as providedin subdivision (e ), andtheamountorrate oftheexempt charge tobe imposed.
Ml._fbt As used inthis section and inSection 9 ofArticle II, "tax" means everyaA1f levy, charge, or exaction ofany kind imposed by theStatestatelawthatis notan exempt charge. e1<eept the follo•Ning:
e) As used in this section. " exempt charge" means only the following:
1) a el:iarge imposes fer a s1=1eeifie eenefit eonferreEl or pri'+'ilege granteEl aireetly to tl:ie 13ayor tl:iat is not 1=1ro>viaeEl to tl:iose notet:iargeEI, anEI whiel:i aoes note1<ceeEl tl:ie reasonal3Ie costs to tl:ie State ofeonferring the benefit orgranting the pri¥ilege to the 1=1a¥OF.
ill {-2+ A reasonable charge irnposeEl for a specific government service orproduct provided directlyto the payorthat is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the rnasonable actual costs to the State ofproviding the service or productto the payor. f.11 ~ A charge in,poseEl forthe reasonable regulatory costs to the State incident to issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcementand adjudication thereof. 3) A levy, charge. orexaction collected from local units ofgovernment. health care providers orhealth care service plans that is primarily used by the State of California for the purposes of increasing reimbursement rates orpayments under the Medi-Cal program, and the revenues ofwhich are primarily used to finance the non-federal portion of Medi-Cal medical assistance expenditures. 4) A reasonable charge iR'l13oseEl forentrance to or use ofstate property, orthe purchase. rental, orlease ofstate property, except charges governed by Section 15 ofArticle XI. 5} A fine, orpenalty, orothermonetary el:large including anyapplicable interest for nonpaymentthereot imposed by the judicial branch of government or the State, as a result of a state administrative enforcement agency pursuant to adiudicatorvdue process, to punish a violation oflaw. 6} A levy, charge, assessment, or exaction collected for the promotion ofCalifornia tourism pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencingwith Section 13995) ofPart 4.7 ofDivision 3 ofTitle 2 ofthe Government Code. flL~Anytaxorexemptcharge adopted afterJanuary 1, 2022 ~, but priortothe effective date ofthis act, that was notadopted in compliance with the requirements ofthis section is void 12 monthsafterthe effective date ofthis act unless the tax orexempt charge is reenacted B'l the begislatuFe anel signea into law ey tl:ie <iio¥ernoF in compliance with the requirements ofthis section. gl[.JlJG:} The State bears the burden of proving by a preponEleranee oftl:le clear andconvincing evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is an exempt charge and not a tax. The State bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the amount ofthe exempt charge is reasonable and that the amountcharged does notexceed the actualcostofproviding the service orproduct tothe payor. ,tR-a-t tl:ie amouRt is RO n,ore tl:ian neeessary to cover the reasonable costs ofthe go•.•emn,ental actii,•i:t>,• ane 3 68
Section 7, Item C.
thatthe mannerin •Nhiel.:i these cests are allecated ts apa·1er bear a fairerreasenable relatienshi13 ts the 13a·1or's b1:1relens on, or benefits reeei11eel from, the go•.ieFRmental actit.iit'( 2) The retention ofrevenue by, orthe paymentto. anon-governmentalentityofalevv. charge, orexaction ofany kind imposed bystate law, shall notbea factor in determining whetherthe levy. charge, orexaction is a tax or exempt charge.
3) The characterization ofa levy, charge, or exaction ofany kind as being voluntary, or paid in exchange for abenefit, privilege, allowance, authorization, or asset, shall notbe a factor in determining whetherthe levy, charge, or exaction is a tax oran exempt charge.
4} The use ofrevenue derived from the levy, charge or exaction shall be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax or exempt charge. h) As used in this section:
1) " Actual cost" ofproviding aservice or product means: (i) the minimum amountnecessary to reimburse the government for the cost ofproviding the service or product to the payor, and {ii) where the amount charged is not used by the government for any purpose other than reimbursing that cost. In computing actual cost" the maximum amountthatmaybeimposedis the actualcostless all other sources ofrevenue including, but not limited to taxes, other exempt charges, grants, and state or federal funds received to provide such service or product.
2) " Extend" includes, but is not limited to, doing any ofthe following with respect to a tax or exempt charge: lengthening its duration. delaying oreliminating its expiration, expanding its application to a new territory or class ofpayor, or expanding thebase to which its rate is applied. 3) " Impose" means adopt, enact, reenact, create, establish, collect, increase or extend. 4) " State law" includes, but is not limited to. any state statute, state regulation, state executive order. state resolution, state ruling, state opinion Jetter, or other legal authority or interpretation adopted, enacted. enforced, issued, orimplemented by the legislative or executive branches ofstate government.
State law" does notinclude actions taken by the Regents ofthe University ofCalifornia, Trustees ofthe California State University, or the Board ofGovernors ofthe California Community Colleges.
Section 5. Section 1 ofArticle XIII Cofthe California Constitution is amended, to read:
Sec. 1. Definitions. As used in this article:
a) "Actual cost" ofproviding aservice or product means: (i) theminimum amountnecessary toreimburse the government for the cost ofproviding the service or product to the payor. and {ii) where the amount charged is not used by the government for any purpose otherthan reimbursing that cost. In computing actual cost" the maximum amount thatmaybeimposed is the actual costless allother sources ofrevenue including, but notlimited to taxes. other exempt charges, grants, and state or federal funds received to provide such service or product.
b) "Extend" includes, butis notlimitedto. doing any ofthe following with respectto atax. exempt charge, orArticle XIII Dassessment. fee, orcharge: lengthening its duration, delaying or eliminating its expiration. expanding its application to a new territory or class ofpayor, or expanding the base to which its rate is applied.
4 69
Section 7, Item C.
lfl..W11General tax" means any tax imposed forgeneral governmental purposes. d} "Impose" means adopt, enact, reenact, create, establish, collect, increase, orextend. clJb} "Local government" means any county, city, city and county, including a charter city or county, any special district, or any otherlocal or regional governmental entity, oran elector pursuant to Article fl or the initiative powerprovided bya charterorstatute.
f) "Local law" includes. butis not limited to, any ordinance, resolution, regulation. ruling, opinion letter, or otherlegal authority or interpretation adopted, enacted, enforced, issued, orimplemented by a local government.
gl_{t} "Special district" means an agency oftheState, formed pursuantto general lawora special act, for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions with limited geographic boundaries including, but not limited to, school districts and redevelopment agencies. f11L{d} " Special tax" means any tax imposed for specific purposes, including a tax imposed for specific purposes, which is placed into a general fund.
111 i@} As used in this article, and in Section 9 ofArticle II, "tax" means every aRV-levy, charge, orexaction ofany kind, imposed bya local go,;ernmeRt law thatis notanexempt charge., exeept tl=le fellowiRg:
i) Asused in this section, "exempt charge" means only the following:
1) A cl=large imposeel fer a speeifie beAefit eoAferreel orpri,;ilege graAteel eliFeetl')' to tl=le pa1,ior tl=lat is Rot pre1,•ieleel to these Rot ehargea, aA£l which £lees Rot exeeeel tl=le reaseAable costs to tl=le loeal gm,·ernFAeAt ofconferriAg the beAefit orgraAting tl:1e pri¥ilege.
illR} A reasonable charge imposes for a specific local government service or product provided directly to the payorthatis not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasoAable actual costs to the local government ofproviding the service or product. fl1 WAcharge im13ose£l forthe reasonable regulatory costs toa local governmentforissuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.
W {4t Areasonable charge imposeel forentranceto oruse oflocal government property, orthe purchase, rental, orlease oflocal government property.
Ml. fSt A fine, or penalty, or other FAOA@tar,· eharge including any applicable interest for nonpayment thereat imposed bythejudicial branch ofgovernment ora local government administrative enforcement agency pursuantto adiudicatorv due process, as a res1,1lt ofto punish a violation oflaw. ill -f6t A charge imposed as a condition ofpropertydevelopment. No levv, charge, orexaction regulating orrelated to vehicle miles traveledmaybe imposed as a condition ofpropertydevelopment oroccupancy. f.i1 f7t An AssessFAeRts aRel property relateel fees assessment. fee. orcharge imJ;1oseel iA aeeoraanee witl=l the pro¥isioA5 ofsubject toArticle XI 11 D, oran assessmentimposed upon a business in a tourism marketing district, a parking and business improvement area, ora propertyandbusiness improvement district. 5 70
Section 7, Item C.
7) A charge imposed for a specific health care service provided directly to the payor and that is not provided to those not charged. and which does notexceed the reasonable costs to the local government ofproviding the health care service. As used in this paragraph, a "health care service" means a service licensed orexemptfrom licensure by the state pursuantto Chapters 1. 1.3, or2 ofDivision 2 ofthe Health andSafety Code.
The local governmentbears the b1:1rden ofproving by a preponderance ofthe e .. · ielence thata lew, charge, or other exaction is nota ta1<, thatthe amo1:1nt is no more than necessaPJ' to coverthe reasonable costs of the go•,ernfflental acti•.«ity anel thattJ:ie mannerin which those costs are allocateel to a pa•ror bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the pa•ror's blslrdens on, orbene:fits receiveel from, the go1a1ernmental acfa•ity.
Section 6. Section 2 ofArticle XIII Cofthe California Constitution is amended to read :
Sec. 2. Local GovernmentTax Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provision ofthisConstitution:
a) Every levy. charge. orexaction ofanykindimposed by local lawis eithera taxoran exempt charge. All taxesimposed byany local government shall bedeemedtobe eithergeneral taxes orspecial taxes. Special purpose districts oragencies, including school districts, shall have no powerto levy general taxes. b) No local Jaw go,.·ernment whether proposed by the governing body or by an elector, may impose, extend, orincrease anygeneral tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved bya majorityvote. A general tax shall not bedeemed to have been increased ifitis imposed ata rate not higherthanthemaximum rate so approved. The election required bythis subdivision shall be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members ofthe governing body ofthe local government, except in cases ofemergency declared bya unanimous vote ofthe governing body. c) An•r general tax imposed, el<tended, orincreaseel, •.-.iitho1:1t •.·oter approval, lay any local go,.·ernment on orafter Janlslary 1, 1995, ana prior ta the effecti,.·e date ofthis article, shall contin1:1e to be imposed only ifappro,.·ea b1• a majority vote ofthe voters voting in an election OR the issye ofthe in:iposition, whicl::i election sl::iall be l::ield witl::iin t•Ne 1•ears ef the effectii.ie date of this article and in com13liance with slslbdi\·isien (b}. {El) No local lawgovernment. whether proposed by the governing body or by an elector. may impose, eMteRd, er increase any special tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higherthan the maximum rate so approved. d) The title and summary and ballot label or question required for a measure pursuant to the Elections Code shall. foreach measure providing forthe imposition ofa tax, include:
1) The type andamountorrate ofthe tax;
2) the duration ofthe tax; and
3) The use ofthe revenue derivedfrom the tax. Iftheproposedtax is a general tax. thephrase "forgeneral government use" shall be required, and no advisory measure may appearon the same ballotthat would indicate thattherevenue from the general tax will. could. orshould be used for a specificpurpose. e) Only the governing body of a local government. other than an elector pursuant to Article II or the initiative power provided bya charteror statute. shall have the authority to impose any exempt charge.
The governing bodyshall impose an exemptcharge by an ordinance specifying the type ofexemptcharge 6 71
Section 7, Item C.
as provided in Section l(i) andthe amountorrate ofthe exemptcharge tobe imposed. andpassed by the governing body. This subdivision shallnotapply to charges specified in paragraph (7) ofsubdivision (i) of Section 1.
ff) Noamendmenttoa Charter which provides forthe imposition, extension, orincrease ofa taxorexempt charge shall be submitted to or approved by the electors. nor shall any such amendment to a Charter hereafter submittedtoorapproved bythe electors become effective foranypurpose. q) Anytaxorexemptcharge adoptedafterJanuary 1, 2022, butpriortotheeffective date ofthis act, that was notadopted in compliance with the requirements ofthis section is void12 months afterthe effective date ofthis actunless the tax or exempt charge is reenacted in compliance with the requirements ofthis section.
h)(1) The focal government bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a levy, charge orexaction is an exempt charge andnota tax. The local government bears the burden ofproving byclearandconvincing evidence thatthe amountofthe exemptcharge is reasonable andthatthe amount charged does notexceed the actual cost ofproviding the service orproductto the payor. 2} The retention ofrevenue by, orthe paymentto, a non-governmentalentityofa levy. charge, orexaction of any kind imposed by a local law, shall not be a factor in determining whether the levy, charge, or exaction is a tax orexemptcharge.
3) The characterization ofa levy. charge. orexaction ofany kind imposed bya local law as being paid in exchange for a benefit. privilege, allowance, authorization, or asset, shall not be factors in determining whetherthe levy, charge, orexaction is a taxoran exempt charge. 4) The use ofrevenue derived from the levy, charge or exaction shall be a factorin determining whether the levy, charge, orexaction is a taxorexemptcharge.
Section 7. Section 3 ofArticle XIII D ofthe California Constitution is amended, to read:
Sec. 3. Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited a) No tax, assessment, fee, 6fcharge, orsurcharge, including a surcharge based on the value ofpropertv, shall be assessed 13y aRy ageRC'f uponanyparcel ofpropertyor uponanypersonas an incidentofproperty ownership except:
1) The ad valorem property tax impeseEI p1::1rsYaRt te described in Section 1(a) ofArticle XIII and Section 1/a) ofArticleXIII A, anddescribed andenacted pursuant to the voterapprovalrequirement in Section 1/b) Q[Article XII IA.
2) Any special non-ad valorem tax receiving a two-thirds vote ofqualified electors pursuant to Section 4 ofArticle XIII A, or afterreceiving a two-thirds vote ofthose authorized to vote in a communityfacilities district by the Legislature pursuant tostatuteas itexisted on December 31, 2021. 3) Assessments as provided bythis article.
4) Fees or charges forproperty related services as provided by this article. 7 72
Section 7, Item C.
b) For purposes of this article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges orfees imposed as an incidentofproperty ownership.
Section 8. Sections 1 and 14ofArticle XIII are amended to read:
Sec. 1 Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution orthe laws ofthe United States:
a) Allproperty istaxable and shall be assessed atthe same percentage offair marketvalue. When a value standard otherthan fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.
b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value. c) All proceeds from the taxation ofproperty shall beapportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.
Sec. 14. All property taxed by state orlocal government shall be assessed in the county, city, and district in which itis situated. Notwithstanding any other provision of/aw, such state orlocal property taxes shall be apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties.
Section 9. General Provisions
A. This Act shall be liberally construed in orderto effectuate its purposes.
B. (1) In the event thatthis initiative measure and anotherinitiative measure ormeasures relating to state orlocal requirements forthe imposition, adoption, creation, orestablishment oftaxes, charges, and other revenue measures shall appear on the same statewide election ballot, the other initiative measure or measures shall be deemed to be in conflict with this measure. In the event that this initiative measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety, and the provisions ofthe other initiative measure ormeasures shall be null and void. 2) In furtherance of this provision, the voters hereby declare that this measure conflicts with the provisions of the " Housing Affordability and Tax Cut Act of 2022" and " The Tax Cut and Housing Affordability Act," both ofwhich would impose a new state property tax (called a "surcharge") on certain real property, and where the revenue derived from the tax is provided to the State, rather than retained in the county in which the property is situated and forthe use ofthe county and cities and districts within the county, in directviolation ofthe provisions ofthis initiative. 3) Ifthis initiative measure is approved by the voters, but superseded in whole or in part by any other conflicting initiative measure approved by the voters at the same election, and such conflicting initiative is later held invalid, this measure shall be self-executing and given full force and effect.
C. The provisions of this Act are severable. If any portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, orapplication ofthis Act is forany reason held to be invalid by a decision ofany court ofcompetent jurisdiction, that decision shall notaffect the validity ofthe remaining portionsofthis Act. The People ofthe State ofCalifornia hereby declare thattheywould have adopted this Act and each and every portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, and application not 8 73
Section 7, Item C.
declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Act or application thereofwould be subsequently declared invalid.
D. If this Act is approved by the voters of the State of California and thereafter subjected to a legal challenge alleging a violation ofstate orfederal law, and both the Governor and Attorney General refuse to defend thisAct, then the following actions shall be taken:
1) Notwithstanding anything tothe contrary contained in Chapter 6 ofPart 2 ofDivision 3 ofTitle2 ofthe Government Code orany other law, the Attorney General shall appoint independent counsel to faithfully and vigorously defend thisAct on behalfoftheState ofCalifornia. 2) Before appointing orthereafter substituting independent counsel, the Attorney General shall exercise due diligence in determining the qualifications of independent counsel and shall obtain written affirmation from independent counsel that independent counsel willfaithfully and vigorously defend this Act. The written affirmation shall be made publicly available upon request. 3) A continuous appropriation is hereby made from the General Fund to the Controller, without regard to fiscal years, in an amount necessary to cover the costs ofretaining independent counsel to faithfully and vigorously defend this Act on behalfoftheState ofCalifornia. 4 ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the proponents ofthis Act, ora bona fide taxpayers association, from intervening to defend this Act.
9 74
Section 7, Item C.
1 The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act Initiative No. 21-0042A11
Feb. 1, 2023
Effective date: Any new or increased tax or fee adopted by the Legislature, a city council, or the local voters after January 1, 2022, must comply with the Act’s new rules.
Voters
Local advisory measures are prohibited. No measure may appear on the ballot asking for approval of a general tax that would allow the voters to express a preference for how the revenue from the general tax will, could, or should be used.
Overturns Upland decision which upheld a special tax that had been placed on the ballot by the voters to be approved by a majority vote. Taxes proposed by initiative will be subject to the same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council.
Voters may not amend a city charter to impose, extend, or increase a tax or fee.
Local taxes
Requires voter approval in order to apply an existing tax:
o to territory that is annexed.
o to a new service or product, for example when a utility user tax is applied to a new service.
All new or increased taxes adopted after Jan. 1, 2022, must include a sunset date.
State taxes
All new or increased state taxes require statewide voter approval.
Prohibits a property tax “surcharge” (increase). Prohibits any allocation of property tax to the state.
1 This is a summary of some of the more significant provisions of the Act. Please review the Act for a complete understanding of the changes it makes to the Constitution.
Exhibit 'B'
75 Section 7, Item C.
2 Fees and charges
Fees and charges for services and permits may not exceed the “actual cost” of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. “Actual cost” is the “minimum amount necessary.” Examples include planning services, excavation and encroachment permits, preparation of candidate statement, and permit parking.
State and cities have the burden of proving by “clear and convincing evidence” that a fee/charge is not a tax, that the amount is reasonable, and that it does not exceed “actual cost.”
Franchise fees — historically considered fees, not taxes — will more likely be considered taxes due to the elimination of an existing category of “fee” and the requirement that charges to entrance, purchase, rental, or lease of government property be “reasonable.” The state and cities issue franchises to oil companies, utilities, gas companies, railroads, garbage companies, cable companies, and other corporations.
No fee or charge or exaction regulating vehicle miles traveled can be imposed as a condition of property development or occupancy.
Fines and penalties (administrative enforcement of state law and municipal codes)
May require voter approval of fines and penalties for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties. Examples include nuisance abatement, organic waste reduction requirements, and failure to maintain a vacant property.
76 Section 7, Item C.
CaliforniaCityFinance.Com
Fiscal and Program Effects of
Initiative 21-0042A1 on Local Governments
If Initiative 21-0042A1 is placed on the ballot and passed by voters, it will result in:
Over $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues over 10 years placed at heightened legal peril. Related public service reductions across virtually every aspect of city, county, special district, and school services especially for drinking water, sewer sanitation, and public health and safety.
About $2 billion of revenues each year from fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2021 subject to legal peril.1
Over $2 billion dollars of annual revenues from dozens of tax measures approved by voters between January 1, 2022 and the effective date of the act2 subject to additional voter approval if not in compliance with the initiative.
Indeterminable legal and administrative burdens and costs on local government from new and more empowered legal challenges, and bureaucratic cost tracking requirements.
The delay and deterrence of municipal annexations.
Substantially higher legal and administrative cost of public infrastructure financing which will delay and deter new residential and commercial development.
Service and infrastructure declines including in fire and emergency response, law enforcement, public health, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, public schools, affordable housing, homelessness prevention and mental health services.
1. Local Government Taxes and Services Threatened
With regard to taxes, Initiative 21-0042A1:
Prohibits advisory, non-binding measures as to use of tax proceeds on the same ballot. o Voters may be less informed and more likely to vote against measures.
Eliminates the ability of special tax measures proposed by citizen initiative to be enacted by majority voter approval (Upland).3
o Because the case law regarding citizen initiative special taxes approved by majority vote (Upland) is so recent, it is unknown how common these sorts of measures might be in the future. This initiative would prohibit such measures after the effective date of the initiative. Any such measures adopted after January 1, 2022 through the effective date of the Act should it pass would be void a year after the effective date of the initiative.
Requires that tax measures include a specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed. This seems to require that all tax increases or extensions contain a sunset (end date). o This would require additional tax measures to extend previously approved taxes.
A city charter may not be amended to impose, extend, or increase a tax might interfere with the ability of cities that do not already have such authority in their charters to adopt Property Transfer Taxes. o There are no more than a few of these every few years, but it is a valuable tax for those that adopt it.
1 Assumes fee increases since January 1, 2022 would be subject to possible legal challenge if not adopted in compliance with the Initiative.
2 The effective date of the initiative would be sometime in December 2024, the date the California Secretary of State certifies the election results of the November 5, 2024 election.
3 Unlike the initiative 17-0050, this initiative does not eliminate that ability of cities and counties to adopt general taxes by majority voter approval.
2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616
Phone: 530.758.3952 • Fax: 530.758.3952
Rev. January 14, 2023
Exhibit 'C'
77 Section 7, Item C.
2 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Requires that a tax measure adopted after January 1, 2022 and before the effective date of the initiative that was not adopted in accordance with the measure be readopted in compliance with the measure or will be void twelve months after the effective date of the initiative. o If past election patterns and elections in 2022 are an indication, over 200 tax measures approving more than $2 billion annual revenues to support local public services would not be in compliance and would be subject to reenactment. Most will be taxes without a specific end date and special taxes (including parcel taxes). Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, the measures would each require declaration of emergency and unanimous vote of the governing board to be placed on a special election ballot within a year for approval or the tax will be void after that date. I would expect most to succeed, but some will not, in particular citizen initiative majority vote special taxes which would have to meet a higher voter approval threshold to continue.
Requires voter approval to expand an existing tax to new territory (annexations). This would require additional tax measures and would deter annexations and land development in cities. o If a tax is "extended" to an annexed area without a vote after January 1, 2022, it will be void 12 months later until brought into compliance. Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, such extensions would each require unanimous vote of the agency board to be placed on a special election ballot or would be void a year later.
1.a. Number of Measures and Value of Local Taxes at Risk4 Over a hundred local measures were approved in 2022 that likely do not comply with the provisions of Initiative 21-0042A1. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter approved measures will cease a year after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures. We can expect a similar volume of measures in 2024 and a similar volume of non-compliance. So the combined total of annual local funding directly affected by Initiative 21-0042A1 due to its retroactivity provision is about $4 billion.
Citizen Initiative Special Taxes in 2022.
Special taxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative and approved after January 1, 2022 by a majority but less than two-thirds of the voters are out of compliance with Initiative 21-0042A1.
On June 7, 2022, there were three local special tax measures placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Two failed to get majority voter approval. A one percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) for the John C. Fremont Healthcare District in Mariposa County received 69.6 percent approval, over the two thirds needed for any special tax under California Constitution Article XIIIC. So this measure was passed in compliance with Initiative 21- 0042A1.
On November 8, 2022, there were 14 local special taxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Seven of these 4 Source: Compilation and summary of data from County elections offices.
June 2022 Initiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Estimated
Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES%
John C. Fremont
Healthcare District
Mariposa Measure N
Transactions
Use Tax
1 cent $ 150,000 hospital 40yrs 69.6% PASS
County ofKings Kings Measure F
Transactions
Use Tax
1/2 cent $ 11,700,000 fire none 37.6% FAIL
Manhattan Beach
USD
Los Angeles Measure A
SchoolParcel
Tax $ 1095/yr $ 12,000,000 schools 12yrs 31.2% FAIL
78 Section 7, Item C.
3 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
measures failed with less than majority voter approval. The other seven measures received majority, but less than two-thirds, voter approval. These measures passed under current law but are out of compliance with Initiative 21- 0042A1. Taken together these seven taxes will provide estimated annual revenues of from $900,000 to $1.4 billion in support of parks and recreation, zoo, library, affordable housing, transportation, homelessness prevention, and schools in these communities.
Non-Specific Tax Durations in 2022
Voters approved 106 measures in June 2022 (10) and November 2022 (96) that do not provide a specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed (end date). Typically, the ballot titles for these measures state that the tax would be imposed “until ended by voters.” Four of these measures also did not include any estimate of the annual revenues that the tax would generate, another violation of initiative 21-0042A1. Taken together, these approved local measures generate $561 million per year that will expire a year after the effective date of the initiative if Initiative 21-0042A1 passes.
November 2022 Initiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Estimated
Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES%
Crockett Community
Services District Contra Costa Measure L Parcel Tax $ 50/parcel $ 60,000 parks/ recr none 62.8% PASS Oakland Alameda Measure Y Parcel Tax $ 68/parcel $ 12,000,000 zoo 20yrs 62.5% PASS County of Mendocino Measure O
Transactions
Use Tax
1/8 cent then 1/4
cent in 2027 $ 4,000,000 library none 60.8% PASS
Los Angeles Los Angeles Measure ULA Property
Transfer Tax
4% if >$5m, 5.5%
if >$10m $ 600 m to $1.1 b
affordable
housing
none 57.3% PASS
County ofSacramento Measure A
Transactions
Use Tax
same 1/2 cent $ 212,512,500 transportati
on
40yrs 55.3% PASS
San Francisco Proposition M
Business
Operations Tax
2500-$5000/
vacant resid unit $ 20,000,000 housing 30yrs 54.5% PASS Santa Monica Los Angeles Measure GS
Property
Transfer Tax
56/$1000 if
8m $ 50,000,000
schools,
homelessne
ss, afford.
housing
none 53.3% PASS
Total $900,000 to
1.4 billion
Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Estimated
Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES%
County of Calaveras Measure A
Transactions
Use Tax
1 cent $ 5,000,000 fire none 49.4% FAIL
South San Francisco
for Schools)
San Mateo Measure DD School Parcel
Tax $ 2.50/sf $ 55,900,000 schools none 47.2% FAIL
County of Fresno (for CSU ) Measure E
Transactions
Use Tax
1/5 ct,
1/40 ct (Reedley) $ 36,000,000 Calif StateUniv
20yrs 46.9% FAIL
Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Measure N Parcel Tax $ 6k/vacant SFU xxx vacant
property
xxx 44.2% FAIL
County of Monterey Measure Q Parcel Tax $ 49/parcel $ 5,500,000 childcare 10yrs 41.1% FAIL San Francisco City
College
San
Francisco
Measure O
School Parcel
Tax $ 150/sfu $ 37,000,000 schools 10yrs 36.7% FAIL
Morro Bay San Luis
Obispo
Measure B Parcel Tax $ 120+/parcel $ 680,000 harbor none 36.0% FAIL Inverness Public
Utility District
Marin Measure O Parcel Tax 0.20/sf,
150/vacant $ 276,000 fire none 27.0% FAIL
79 Section 7, Item C.
4 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Annual
Revenue Use Sunset YES%
Oakland Alameda Measure T
Business Tax
General
various $ 20,900,000 none 71.4% PASS
Culver City Los Angeles Measure BL Business Tax
General
various $ 10,000,000 none 60.5% PASS
ElSegundo Los Angeles Measure BT Business Tax
General
various $ 3,000,000 none 51.2% PASS
Pico Rivera Los Angeles Measure AB Business Tax
General
various $ 5,800,000 none 75.5% PASS
Santa Ana Orange Measure W
Business Tax
General
various neutral none 64.8% PASS
Tracy San Joaquin Measure B
Business Tax
General
various $ 3,200,000 none 72.6% PASS
Burlingame San Mateo Measure X
Business Tax
General various $ 2,500,000 none 75.1% PASS
Los Gatos Santa Clara Measure J
Business Tax
General
various $ 1,100,000 none 53.4% PASS
Santa Clara Santa Clara Measure H
Business Tax
General
45/employee,
15/rental unit $ 6,000,000 none 59.5% PASS
Brisbane San Mateo Measure O
Business Tax
lodging busn $ 2.50/rm/day $ 250,000 none 69.2% PASS
East Palo Alto San Mateo Measure L
Business Tax
resid. rentals
2.5%
grossRcpts $ 1,480,000 none 69.9% PASS
County ofSanta CruzUnincorporated Measure C
Busn Tax -
disp cups
12.5cents/ cup $ 700,000 none 68.2% PASS
South Lake Tahoe ElDorado Measure G
Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% retail,
manufacturing $ 950,000 none 62.9% PASS
McFarland Kern Measure O
Busn Tax
Cannabis
8% of gross
receipts retail, $ 1,800,000 none 63.5% PASS
Avenal Kings Measure C
Busn Tax
Cannabis
25+/sf or
15% gr rcpts $ 600,000 none 61.8% PASS
Baldwin Park Los Angeles Measure CB Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%
grossRcpts $ 300,000 none 51.3% PASS
Claremont Los Angeles Measure CT Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%-7% gr
rcpts, $1- $ 500,000 none 61.1% PASS
County of Los Angeles Unincorporated Measure C
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4% gross
receipts retail, $ 15,170,000 none 60.1% PASS
Cudahy Los Angeles Measure BA Busn Tax
Cannabis
15%
grossRcpts $ 3,600,000 none 54.0% PASS
ElSegundo Los Angeles Measure Y
Busn Tax
Cannabis
10%
GrossRcpt, $ 1,500,000 none 72.8% PASS
Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Measure T
Busn Tax
Cannabis
10%
GrossRcpt, $ 1,500,000 none 67.6% PASS
Lynwood Los Angeles Measure TR Busn Tax
Cannabis
5%to10% $ 3,000,000 none 66.4% PASS
Santa Monica Los Angeles Measure HM Busn Tax
Cannabis
10% gross
Rcpts $ 5,000,000 none 66.4% PASS
South ElMonte Los Angeles Measure CM Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% special
excise taxon $ 126,000 none 53.7% PASS
Monterey Monterey Measure J
Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% grossRcpt $ 1,300,000 none 65.2% PASS
Pacific Grove Monterey Measure N
Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% grossRcpt $ 300,000 none 70.8% PASS
Huntington Beach Orange Measure O
Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% retail, 1%
other $ 600,000 none 54.7% PASS
80 Section 7, Item C.
5 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Notes
Ballot measure title did not include an estimate of annual revenues, also not in compliance with Initiative 21-0042A1. n/ a*= Arcadia Measure SW passed but sports betting remains illegal after the failure of Propositions 26 and 27 on the November statewide ballot.
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Annual
Revenue Use Sunset YES%
Laguna Woods Orange Measure T
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4%-10% of
gross receipts $ 750,000 none 61.1% PASS
Corona Riverside Measure G
Busn Tax
Cannabis
9% of gross
receipts for $ 5,000,000 none 61.6% PASS
Montclair San Bernardino Measure R
Busn Tax
Cannabis
7%
grossRcpts $ 3,500,000 none 70.3% PASS
County ofSan Diego Unincorporated Measure A
Busn Tax
Cannabis
6% retail, 3%
distribution, $ 5,600,000 none 57.4% PASS
Encinitas San Diego Measure L
Busn Tax
Cannabis
4% to 7% of
gross receipts $ 1,400,000 none 65.1% PASS
Healdsburg Sonoma Measure M
Busn Tax
Cannabis 8% grossRcpt $ 500,000 none 72.7% PASS
Exeter Tulare Measure B
Busn Tax
Cannabis
10% retail and
other, $10/sf ?
none 66.5% PASS
Tulare Tulare Measure Y
Busn Tax
Cannabis
10% retail and
other, $10/sf ?
none 65.2% PASS
Woodland Yolo Measure K
Busn Tax
Cannabis
10%
grossRcpts ?
none 66.2% PASS
Redlands San Bernardino Measure J
Busn Tax
Distrib centers
from $0.047/sf
to $0.105/sf $ 530,000 none 53.5% PASS
Arcadia Los Angeles Measure SW Busn Tax
Sports Betting
5%
grossRcpts
n/a* none 63.9% PASS
Albany Alameda Measure K ParcelTax $ 0.074+/sf $ 1,950,000 fire/EMS none76.0% PASS Cameron Park Airport
District
El Dorado Measure J ParcelTax by $600 to
900/parcel $ 117,900 airport/ streets
none 78.2% PASS
Highlands Village
Lighting Benefit Zone
El Dorado Measure L ParcelTax $ 140+/parcel $ 10,920 streets none 86.3% PASS Knolls Property
Owners CSD
El Dorado Measure P ParcelTax by $300+ to
600+/parcel $ 8,400 streets none 75.5% PASS
Sundance Trail Zone of
Benefit El Dorado Measure C ParcelTax $ 600+/yr $ 24,000 roads none 73.2% PASS South Pasadena Los Angeles Measure LL ParcelTax xxx ? library none 86.2% PASS River Delta Fire District Sacramento Measure H ParcelTax $ 90/yr $ 130,000 fire none 72.1% PASS Emeryville Alameda Measure O PropTransfTax
15/$1000 if
1m-$2m, $ 5,000,000 none 71.6% PASS
San Mateo San Mateo Measure CC PropTransfTax by 1% to 1.5% if >$10m $ 4,800,000 none 71.8% PASS
Alameda Alameda Measure F TOT by 4% to 14% $ 910,000 none 59.2% PASS Clovis Fresno Measure B TOT by 2% to 12% $ 500,000 none 69.7% PASS Kerman Fresno Measure G TOT 10% $ 40,000 none 62.3% PASS Trinidad Humboldt Measure P TOT by 4% to 12% $ 65,000 none 77.6% PASS Imperial Imperial Measure G TOT by 4% to 12% $ 600,000 none 56.2% PASS Arcadia Los Angeles Measure HT TOT by 2% to 12% $ 730,000 none 54.1% PASS Santa Monica Los Angeles Measure CS TOT by 1%, 3%
home shares $ 4,100,000 none 73.7% PASS
81 Section 7, Item C.
6 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Annual
Revenue Use Sunset YES%
Anaheim Orange Measure J TOT online travel
companies $ 3,000,000 none 59.2% PASS
La Palma Orange Measure P TOT by 4% to 12% $ 200,000 none 71.1% PASS Colfax Placer Measure B TOT by 2% to10% $ 29,000 none 73.5% PASS Rocklin Placer Measure F TOT by 2% to 10% $ 300,000 none 59.8% PASS Roseville Placer Measure C TOT by 4% to 10% $ 3,000,000 none 73.0% PASS Big Bear Lake San Bernardino Measure P TOT by 2% to 10% $ 1,300,000 none54. 4% PASS Grand Terrace San Bernardino Measure M TOT new 10% $ 250,000 none 51.9% PASS Yucca Valley San Bernardino Measure K TOT by 5% to 12% $ 1,300,000 none 71.9% PASS ImperialBeach San Diego Measure R TOT by 4% to 14% $ 400,000 none 67.4% PASS El Paso de Robles San Luis ObispoMeasure F TOT by 1% to 11% $ 750,000 none 61.2% PASS Belmont San Mateo Measure K TOT by 2% to 14% $ 600,000 none 79.3% PASS Millbrae San Mateo Measure N TOT by 2% to 14% $ 1,500,000 none 75.8% PASS County of Humboldt Unincorporated Measure J TOT by 2% to 12% $ 3,080,000 none 63.3% PASS County ofPlacer -
North Tahoe TOT Area
Measure A TOT by 2% to 10% $ 4,000,000 none 90.0% PASS
County of Santa Cruz Unincorporated Measure B TOT by 1% to 12% $ 2,300,000 none 69.2% PASS County of El Dorado -
East Slope Tahoe
Measure S TOT 2/3 by 4% to 14% $ 2,500,000 none 81.8% PASS Chico Butte Measure H TrUT 1 cent $ 24,000,000 none 52.4% PASS Mendota Fresno Measure H TrUT 1.25 cent $ 493,498 none 57.2% PASS Blue Lake Humboldt Measure R TrUT 1 cent $ 30,000 none 55.4% PASS Rio Dell Humboldt Measure O TrUT 3/4cent $ 400,000 none 53.3% PASS County ofKern unincorporated areas Measure K TrUT 1 cent $ 54,000,000 none 50.8% PASS McFarland Kern Measure M TrUT 1 cent $ 579,662 none 62.2% PASS Tehachapi Kern Measure S TrUT 1 cent $ 4,000,000 none 57.2% PASS Avenal Kings Measure A TrUT 1 cent $ 500,000 none 72.5% PASS Susanville Lassen Measure P TrUT 1 cent $ 1,750,000 none 54.7% PASS Baldwin Park Los Angeles Measure BP TrUT 3/4 cent $ 6,000,000 none 58.1% PASS Malibu Los Angeles Measure MC TrUT 1/2 cent $ 3,000,000 none 52.6% PASS Monterey Park Los Angeles Measure MP TrUT 3/4 cent $ 6,000,000 none 58.5% PASS Torrance Los Angeles Measure SST TrUT 1/2 cent $ 18,000,000 none 55.0% PASS Larkspur Marin Measure G TrUT 1/4 cent $ 700,000 none 59.4% PASS Sand City Monterey Measure L TrUT by 1/2cent to
1.5cents $ 1,400,000 none 68.7% PASS
Hemet Riverside Measure H TrUT same 1 cent $ 15,000,000 none 58.0% PASS Elk Grove Sacramento Measure E TrUT 1 cent $ 21,000,000 none 54.1% PASS Galt Sacramento Measure Q TrUT 1 cent $ 3,600,000 none 52.4% PASS Colton San Bernardino Measure S TrUT 1 cent $ 9,500,000 none 66.8% PASS Ontario San Bernardino Measure Q TrUT 1 cent $ 95,000,000 none 53.2% PASS Solana Beach San Diego Measure S TrUT 1 cent $ 3,000,000 none 66.7% PASS Brisbane San Mateo Measure U TrUT 1/2 cent $ 2,000,000 none 63.9% PASS Goleta Santa Barbara Measure B TrUT 1 cent $ 10,600,000 none 64.7% PASS Solvang Santa Barbara Measure U TrUT 1 cent $ 1,600,000 none 63.1% PASS 82 Section 7, Item C.
7 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Co-temporal Advisory Measures in 2022
At the November 2022 election, there was just one local general tax measure that was accompanied by an advisory measure as to the use of funds. The City of Santa Monica’s Measure DT property transfer tax failed with just 34 percent approval as voters instead chose the citizen initiative Measure GS.
There was also just one such tax use advisory measure on the June 2022 election. Susanville’s voters passed Measure P, a 1 percent transactions and use (sales) tax that generates $1.75 million per year5 for general city services. The measure was accompanied by advisory Measure Q, accompanied the city’s It asked, “If Measure P passes, should the revenues be used to balance the budget to maintain and enhance existing public safety services (police and fire), and provide funding to support street infrastructure improvements and provide funding to support economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs and visitors to Susanville?” Both measures passed. Under Initiative 21-0042A1, the tax will expire a year after the effective date of the initiative i.e., in December 2025).
1.b. Additional Costs and Public Service Effects of the Tax Provisions Assuming a similar volume of local measures through 2024 as we saw in 2022, there will be over 200 local measures that will need to be redrafted to comply with the Initiative and placed back on the ballot for the taxes to continue after December 2025. The costs of re-drafting, re-placing and re-voting on these measures, previously legally approved by voters, will be in the tens of millions in total statewide.
2. “ Exempt Charges” (fees and charges that are not taxes) and Services Threatened With regard to fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2022, Initiative 21-0042A1:
Subjects new fees and charges for a product or service to a new "actual and reasonable test." Subjects fees and charges for entrance to local government property; and rental and sale of local government property to a new, undefined, “reasonable” test.
Allows legal challenge to any tax adopted before the effective date of the initiative and after January 1, 5 The Susanville measure also did not include a specific end date and so is included in the list and totals of those measures.
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Agency Name County Tax/Fee Rate
Annual
Revenue Use Sunset YES%
Watsonville Santa Cruz Measure R TrUT 1/2 cent $ 5,000,000 none 64.4% PASS Vallejo Solano Measure P TrUT 7/8 cent $ 18,000,000 none 54.7% PASS Modesto Stanislaus Measure H TrUT 1cent $ 39,000,000 none 62.8% PASS County ofColusa Measure A TrUT 2/3 1/2 cent $ 2,400,000 EMS none 69.4% PASS Atwater Merced Measure B TrUT 2/3 same 1 cent $ 4,000,000 police/fire none 73.7% PASS Truckee Nevada Measure U TrUT 2/3
by 1/4cent to
1/2 cent $ 3,000,000 open spacetrails
none 76.4% PASS
Palo Alto Santa Clara Measure L UtilityTransfer 18% gas $ 7,000,000 none 77.7% PASS Santa Clara Santa Clara Measure G UtilityTransfer 5 % $ 30,000,000 none 84.2% PASS Hercules Contra Costa Measure N UUT 8% $ 3,600,000 none 69.3% PASS Carson Los Angeles Measure UU UUT 2% electr, gas $ 8,000,000 none 78.4% PASS Sebastopol Sonoma Measure N UUT 3.75% (same) $ 700,000 none 83.5% PASS 83 Section 7, Item C.
8 – revJanuary14, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com
2022. Such a lawsuit could enjoin (stop) the enactment of the tax pending the outcome of the legal challenge.
Subjects a challenged fee to new, higher burdens of proof if legally challenged.
2.a. Value on New Local Government Fees and Charges at Risk6 Virtually every city, county, and special district must regularly (e.g., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and charges and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies and increases in those fees simply to accommodate inflation, the amount of local government fee and charge revenue placed at risk is about $2 billion per year including those adopted since January 1, 2022. Of $2 billion, about $900 million (45 percent) is for special districts, $800 million (40 percent) is cities, and $300 million (15 percent) is counties.7 Major examples of affected fees and charges are:
1. Certain water, sanitary sewer, wastewater, garbage, electric, gas service fees.
2. Nuisance abatement charges - such as for weed, rubbish and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs.
3. Emergency response fees - such as in connection with DUI.
4. Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport charges.
5. Business improvement district charges.
6. Fees for processing of land use and development applications such as plan check fees, use permits, design review, environmental assessment, plan amendment, subdivision map changes.
7. Document processing and duplication fees.
8. Facility use charges, parking fees, tolls.
9. Fines, penalties.
10. Fees for parks and recreation services.
2.b. Additional Costs and Public Service Effects of the Fee/Charge Provisions In addition to service delays and disruptions due to fee and charge revenues placed at greater legal risk, there would be substantial additional costs for legal defense. The risk to fees and charges will make infrastructure financing more difficult and will deter new residential and commercial development. mc
6 Source: California State Controller Annual Reports of Financial Transactions concerning cities, counties and special districts, summarized with an assumed growth due to fee rate increases (not population) of 2 percent annually. 7 School fees are also affected but the amount is negligible by comparison. 84 Section 7, Item C.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: John Jansons, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of City’s position and possible Resolution regarding Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the Fresno County Transportation Agency and enact other project conditions (JAJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Consider Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the Fresno County Transportation Agency and impose wage and environmental review conditions on funded projects; and
2. Determine whether to adopt a position in support or opposition to the proposed bill; and
3. Adopt resolution accordingly that communicates the Council’s position to the bill’s author Assembly Arambula, the Assembly Committee on Local Government, Cal Cities and Fresno County Transportation Authority.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Assembly Bill 558, sponsored by Assembly Member Joaquin Arambula, District 31 Fresno, seeks to amend and expand the governance structure of the Fresno County Transportation Agency (FCTA) by adding four unelected representatives from labor, education, youth, and a disadvantaged unincorporated area resident. AB 558 also proposed to add wage and environmental review conditions placed upon FCTA funded projects.
Currently, The FCTA Board consists of nine members (9) with two members from the City of Fresno, two members from the Fresno County Board of Supervisors, one member from the City of Clovis, one member from a rural east side city, one member from a rural west side city, an urban Member-At-Large and a rural Member-At-Large.
AB 558 is currently under consideration by the Assembly Committee on Local Government.
DISCUSSION: FCTA was established in 1986 as a part of Fresno County’s first county-wide locally funded transportation sales tax measure (Measure C).
At that time, the FCTA Board consisted of two members from the City of Fresno, two members of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors, an Eastside and Westside City representative, and a City of Clovis representative.
In 2006, two additional members were added to the FCTA Board; an urban and a rural MemberAt-Large with the rural member appointed by the Board of Supervisors and the urban member 85 Section 7, Item D.
appointed jointly by the Cities of Fresno and Clovis. The two additional members were requested locally and were added just prior to the 2006 reauthorization.
The new Board membership was then approved by the voters of Fresno County. This was not a top-down change but rather a local request. These at-large positions have been filled with individuals of various backgrounds. The two current at-large members come from the disabled community and the goods movement industry.
AB 558 proposes to add four additional non-elected members to the FCTA Board from various backgrounds, including labor, education, youth, and an additional disadvantaged unincorporated area resident. AB 558 would also extend prevailing wage requirements to projects that are not in their entirety a public works project, and would require Measure C projects to adhere to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
These proposed changes rest on the assumption that these additional members are necessary because the constitution of the existing Board does not adequately represent people in underserved communities and the current FCTA Board is not inclusive.
FCTA strongly disagrees with this premise. FCTA is in fact proud that the existing Board is extremely diverse and represents all of Fresno County, including the 15 incorporated cities, the unincorporated communities, as well as the rural unincorporated areas and does not need to be changed.
FCTA believes that the changes proposed by AB 558 are unwarranted and will reduce the influence and effectiveness of the elected representatives on the FCTA Board. Further, FCTA claims AB 558 is an example of Sacramento imposing a State requirement on a local transportation funding measure.
While it may be difficult for any Board or Commission to represent every citizen of Fresno County on an equal basis, FCTA believes the current Board membership achieves a good balance between urban cities, small rural cities, and rural unincorporated areas. FCTA contends that adding four new unelected Board members who are not accountable to the voters of Fresno County would not provide better representation than the current Board membership.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is unknown at this time what fiscal impact there may be directly to Kerman with the proposed changes to FCTA governance and other aspects to the AB 558. Although it can be safely assumed that all member agencies will see smaller project awards due to the increased costs of wage and environmental review conditions set forth in AB 558 which are expected to have significant costs associated with them.
AB 558 would increase costs for projects County-wide, thereby resulting in smaller or fewer projects being completed in Fresno County with the projected resources available.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Draft Resolution in Support of AB 558
B. Draft Resolution in Opposition to AB 558
C. AB 558 Bill Text
D. Opposition to AB 558 from Fresno County Transportation Agency 86 Section 7, Item D.
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN IN SUPPORT AB 558,
REGARDING CHANGES TO THE GOVERNANCE AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS OF THE
FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (FCTA)
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Transportation Agency (FCTA), has operated since 2005 pursuant to state law; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Member Arambula has submitted to the California Legislature Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the FCTA Board and requires additional wage and environmental condition for FCTA projects; and WHEREAS, Kerman is a member beneficiary of FCTA funded projects, transportation planning, and eligible for FCTA Board membership; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes the changes proposed by AB 558 (Arambula) are beneficial to Kerman and Fresno County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Kerman supports AB 558.
Section 1. The recitals above and true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to email a copy of this adopted Resolution to the following:
1. California State Assembly Committee of Local Governance,
2. Office of Assembly Member Joaquin Arambula,
3. Fresno County Transportation Agency,
4. The League of California Cities; and
5. Other interested parties in support of the passage of AB 558.
Section 3. This Resolution is effective immediately.
The foregoing resolution was considered by the City Council to the City of Kerman at a regular meeting of said Council held on 26th day of April 2023, adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
87 Section 7, Item D.
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
88 Section 7, Item D.
Attachment ‘B’
RESOLUTION NO. 23-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN OPPOSING AB 558,
REGARDING CHANGES TO THE GOVERNANCE AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS OF THE
FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (FCTA)
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Transportation Agency (FCTA), has operated since 2005 WHEREAS, Assembly Member Arambula has submitted to the California Legislature Assembly Bill 558 which proposes to change the governance structure of the FCTA Board and requires additional wage and environmental condition for FCTA projects; and WHEREAS, Kerman is a member beneficiary of FCTA funded projects, transportation planning, and eligible for FCTA Board membership; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes the changes proposed by AB 558 are unnecessary and detrimental to Kerman and Fresno County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Kerman opposes AB 558; Section 1. The recitals above and true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to email a copy of this adopted Resolution to the following:
1. California State Assembly Committee of Local Governance,
2. Office of Assembly Member Joaquin Arambula,
3. Fresno County Transportation Agency,
4. The League of California Cities,
5. Other interested parties in opposing AB 558.
Section 3. This Resolution is effective immediately.
The foregoing resolution was considered by the City Council to the City of Kerman at a regular meeting of said Council held on 26th day of April 2023, adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
89 Section 7, Item D.
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
Maria Pacheco
Mayor
ATTEST:
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
90 Section 7, Item D.
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 23, 2023
california legislature—2023–24 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 558
Introduced byAssembly MemberArambula
February 8, 2023
An act to amend Section 142108 of Sections 142051 and 142052 of, and to add Sections 142156 and 142157 to, the Public Utilities Code, relating to transportation.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 558, as amended, Arambula. Fresno County Transportation Authority.
The Fresno County Transportation ImprovementAct provides forthe establishment creation of the Fresno County Transportation Authority with a specified membership. Existing law requires the authority to provide notice of the time and place of a public hearing on the adoption on an annual budget and to make the proposed annual budget available for public inspection for at least 15 days before the hearing. 9 members, as specified. Existing law authorizes the authority to raise revenue, as specified, and to fund regional and local transportation improvements.
Existing law imposes various requirements on public works projects, including a requirement that, at minimum, all workers employed on a public works project be paid the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which a public work is performed, as specified.
This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the latter provision. increase the membership of the authority to 13 members by adding to the authority a member of the public at large who represents a labor organization, a youth member, a local community member who is from 98 Attachment 'C'
91 Section 7, Item D.
a disadvantaged, unincorporated area of the county, and an educational member representing the county, as specified. The bill would require the authority, for a project that it funds, to ensure that certain prevailing wage requirements are satisfied if the project is not in its entirety a public work project and, for a construction or development project it funds, to enforce and promote environmental protections and regulations adopted pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as specified. By imposing new requirements on the authority, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no yes.
State-mandated local program: no yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the line 2 following:
line 3 ( a) The lived experiences of underserved communities in the line 4 County of Fresno are often times overlooked and it is imperative line 5 that community input, diverse backgrounds, and diverse ideas are line 6 reflected on the board of the Fresno County Transportation line 7 Authority.
line 8 ( b) Diesel trucks, factories, and weakening sustainable farming line 9 practices spew fatal toxins, and warehouses and distribution line 10 centers release harmful emissions, that migrate throughout the line 11 central valley and cause chronic health conditions, including line12 respiratory diseases, infections, heart disease, cancer, line 13 developmental disorders, and reproductive ailments. line 14 ( c) The surrounding region is severely impacted by climate line 15 change and the state must take action to protect human health. line 16 ( d) Diversifying leadership on the board of the Fresno County line 17 Transportation Authority will result in more inclusive agendas line 18 and transform restorative environmental justice and climate policy. 98 AB 558 2 —
92 Section 7, Item D.
line 1 ( e) In the San Joaquin Valley, neighborhoods that are line 2 predominately Black or Hispanic are more likely to be burdened line 3 by air pollution and environmental hazards and to lack the line 4 resources to reduce chronic health conditions.
line 5 ( f) Local projects will fuel local public employment that should line 6 include skilled workforce training, higher wages, and labor line 7 protections.
line 8 ( g) The Fresno County Transportation Authority must prioritize line 9 publically funded projects that uphold environmental protection line 10 standards under the California Environmental Quality Act line 11 ( Division 13 ( commencing with Section 21000) of the Public line 12 Resources Code) and that do not harm protected indigenous lands line 13 or underserved populations.
line 14 SEC. 2. Section 142051 of the Public Utilities Code is amended line 15 to read:
line 16 142051. The authority shall consist of nine 13 members selected line 17 as follows:
line 18 ( a) Two members of the board of supervisors appointed by the line 19 board, board of supervisors, consisting of one member from rural line 20 district 1, 4, or 5 and one member from urban district 2 or 3. line 21 ( b) Two members representing the City of Fresno, consisting line 22 of the mayor thereof and a member of the city council of that city line 23 appointed by the city council.
line 24 ( c) One member representing the City of Clovis appointed by line 25 the city council of that city.
line 26 ( d) Two members representing the other cities within the county, line 27 consisting of one westside member appointed by a committee line 28 comprised of comprising the mayors of each of those cities west line 29 of State Highway Route 99, and one eastside member appointed line 30 by a committee comprised of comprising the mayors of each of line 31 those cities east of State Highway Route 99.
line 32 ( e) Two members of the public at large, consisting of one line 33 member appointed by the board of supervisors with the appointee line 34 residing outside of the incorporated areas of the Cities of Fresno line 35 and Clovis, and one member appointed jointly by the city councils line 36 of the Cities of Fresno and Clovis with the appointee residing line 37 within the incorporated area of the City of Fresno or Clovis. line 38 ( f) One member of the public at large who represents a labor line 39 organization and demonstrates an understanding of diversity, line 40 equity, labor advocacy, wage benefit protections, project labor 98 3 — AB 558 —
93 Section 7, Item D.
line 1 agreements, and skilled workforce training, appointed by the city line 2 council of the City of Fresno.
line 3 ( g) 1) One youth member, who lives in the County of Fresno, line 4 appointed by the Governor, who may appoint an individual from line 5 a nominee list submitted pursuant to paragraph (2). line 6 ( 2) A) Youth-serving nonprofit organizations in the county line 7 may collaboratively develop a nominee list of two or more line 8 individuals who advocate for higher education needs, mental health line 9 wellness, or social justice within the county, are residents of the line 10 county, are between 18 and 26 years of age, inclusive, and are not line 11 elected officials. The nominee list shall be submitted to the board line 12 of supervisors.
line 13 ( B) Not more than one year before the expiration of the youth line 14 member’s term or a vacancy of that position, the board of line 15 supervisors shall consider any nominee list submitted pursuant to line 16 subparagraph (A) and may submit a nominee list to the Governor line 17 to assist in the appointment of the youth member. line18 ( h) 1) One local community member who is from a line 19 disadvantaged, unincorporated area of the county and is involved line 20 in community and civic advocacy, appointed by the board of line 21 supervisors and selected from a nominee list submitted pursuant line 22 to paragraph (2).
line 23 ( 2) Not more than one year before the expiration of the local line 24 community member’s term or a vacancy of that position, nonprofit line 25 organizations that have a presence in the county and support civic line 26 involvement may collaboratively develop a nominee list of two or line 27 more individuals and submit the nominee list to the board of line 28 supervisors.
line 29 ( i) One educational member representing the county and who line 30 is a parent, teacher, principal, superintendent, or school employee, line 31 appointed by the Fresno County Board of Education. line 32 SEC. 3. Section 142052 of the Public Utilities Code is amended line 33 to read:
line 34 142052. ( a) Except for the Mayor of the City of Fresno, the line 35 members of the authority shall serve for a term terms of two years. line 36 ( b) If any member other than the public member members of line 37 the public at large, youth member, local community member, or line 38 educational member ceases to be an elected official, that member line 39 shall cease to be a member of the authority, and another member 98 AB 558 4 —
94 Section 7, Item D.
line 1 shall be appointed for the remainder of the term pursuant to Section line 2 142051.
line 3 SEC. 4. Section 142156 is added to the Public Utilities Code, line 4 to read:
line 5 142156. For any project funded by the authority that is not in line 6 its entirety a public work for purposes of Chapter 1 (commencing line 7 with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, the line 8 authority shall ensure that all of the following requirements are line 9 satisfied:
line 10 ( a) All construction workers employed in the execution of the line 11 project shall be paid at least the general prevailing rate of per line 12 diem wages for the type of work and geographic area, as line 13 determined by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to line 14 Sections 1773 and 1773.9 of the Labor Code, including apprentices line 15 registered in programs approved by the Chief of the Division of line 16 Apprenticeship Standards may be paid at least the applicable line 17 apprentice prevailing rate.
line 18 ( b) The project proponent shall ensure that the prevailing wage line 19 requirement is included in all contracts for the performance of the line 20 work for those portions of the project that are not a public work line 21 for purposes of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of Part line 22 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code.
line 23 ( c) All contractors and subcontractors for those portions of the line 24 project that are not a public work for purposes of Chapter 1 line 25 ( commencing with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the line 26 Labor Code shall comply with both of the following:
line 27 ( 1) Pay to all construction workers employed in the execution line 28 of the project at least the general prevailing rate of per diem line 29 wages, in addition apprentices registered in programs approved line 30 by the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards may be line 31 paid at least the applicable apprentice prevailing rate. line 32 ( 2) Maintain and verify payroll records pursuant to Section line 33 1776 of the Labor Code and make those records available for line 34 inspection and copying as provided in that section. This paragraph line 35 does not apply if all contractors and subcontractors performing line 36 work on the project are subject to a project labor agreement that line 37 requires the payment of prevailing wages to all construction line 38 workers employed in the execution of the project and provides for line 39 enforcement of that obligation through an arbitration procedure. line 40 For purposes of this paragraph, “ project labor agreement” has 98 5 — AB 558 —
95 Section 7, Item D.
line 1 the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) line 2 of Section 2500 of the Public Contract Code.
line 3 SEC. 5. Section 142157 is added to the Public Utilities Code, line 4 to read:
line 5 142157. For any construction or development project funded line 6 by the authority, the authority shall enforce and promote line 7 environmental protections and regulations adopted pursuant to line8 the California Environmental Quality Act ( Division 13 line 9 ( commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code). line 10 SEC. 6. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that line 11 this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to line 12 local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made line 13 pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division line 14 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
line 15 SECTION 1. Section 142108 of the Public Utilities Code is line 16 amended to read:
line 17 142108. ( a) Notice of the time and place of a public hearing line 18 on the adoption of the annual budget shall be published pursuant line 19 to Section 6061 of the Government Code not later than the 15th line 20 day prior to the day of the hearing.
line 21 ( b) The proposed annual budget shall be available for public line 22 inspection at least 15 days before the hearing.
O
98 AB 558 6 —
96 Section 7, Item D.
2220 Tulare Street, Suite 201 Fresno, CA 93721 | P 559.600.3282 | www.measurec.com | [email protected] Mike Leonardo
Executive Director
April 6, 2023
The Honorable Joaquin Arambula
Assemblymember, 31st District
1021 O Street, Suite 8130
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: AB 558 (Arambula) Fresno County Transportation AuthorityMembership - OPPOSE Dear Assemblymember Arambula:
On behalf of the Fresno County Transportation Authority ( FCTA), I write to you inOPPOSITION to AB 558, your measure that proposes to alter the composition of the FCTA Board of Directors in response to unfounded concerns over the process that our agency followed to develop the most recent transportation sales tax measure in Fresno County that sought local voter approval on the November 2022 ballot for a 30-year extension of our current Measure C (half-cent sales tax). This measure ultimately fell short of the necessary votes for extension.
FCTA was established in 1986 as a part of Fresno County’s first county-wide locally funded transportation sales tax measure (Measure C). At that time, the FCTA Board consisted of two members from the City of Fresno, two members of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors, an Eastside and Westside City representative, and a City of Clovis representative. In 2006, Measure C was extended for an additional 20 years and remains in place until 2027 unless extended. In 2006, two additional members were added to the FCTA Board; an urban and a rural Member-At-Large with the rural member appointed by the Board of Supervisors and the urban member appointed jointly by the Cities of Fresno and Clovis. The two additional members were requested locally and were added just prior to the 2006 reauthorization. The new Board membership was then included in the 2006 ballot materials approved by the voters of Fresno County. This was not a top-down change but rather a local request. These at-large positions have been filled with individuals of various backgrounds. The two current at- large members come from the disabled community and the goods movement industry.
AB 558 proposes to add four additional non-elected members to the FCTA Board from various backgrounds, would purportedly extend prevailing wage requirements to projects that are not in their entirety a public works project, and would require Measure C projects to adhere to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These proposed changes rest on the assumption that these additional members are necessary because the constitution of the existing Board does not adequately represent people in underserved communities and current FCTA Board agendas are not inclusive. We strongly disagree with this perspective. Please note that the existing Board represents all of Fresno County, including the 15 incorporated cities, the unincorporated communities, as well as the rural unincorporated areas.
Attachment 'D'
97 Section 7, Item D.
AB 558
April 7, 2023
Approximately 65% of the Fresno County population is within the Fresno-Clovis metropolitan area. The other incorporated cities make up 18% whilethe unincorporated areas and communities make up the remaining 17%. The Fresno-Clovis metro area has four members on the Board. The smaller unincorporated cities have two ( or three depending on how the Rural-At-Large member is considered), while the unincorporated areas have two (or three, again depending on how the Rural-At-Large is considered). While not an exact match, this Board composition does well at ensuring adequate representation for all of Fresno County.
During recent efforts to renew Measure Cfor an additional 30 years, certain groups opposed to the renewal effort claimed that FCTA staff, consultants and the Board did not authentically engage with the public, especially in regard to disadvantaged areas of Fresno County. This could not be further from the truth. FCTA, in partnership with the Fresno County Council of Governments (Fresno COG), engaged in extensive public outreach and engagement. This effort was unprecedented in Fresno County, especially considering it occurred during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. In summary:
The renewal effort was guided by two diverse committees consisting of a total of approximately 85 members. These two committees consisted of representatives from local government, health, business, agriculture, goods movement, education, disabled, youth, labor, chambers of commerce, public safety, ADA & Seniors, non-motorized modal advocates, transit advocates, air quality advocates and eight different community-based organizations representing a broad cross section of disadvantaged and underserved communities and groups. ( Complete membership of these committees is included as an attachment to this letter).
During 2021 and 2022, FCTA conducted two public opinion polls of close to 60001 residents. Each area of the County, including rural unincorporated areas were represented by a statistically valid number of people contacted. Oversampling was done in rural areas in order to ensure each area was statistically valid.
Approximately 2800 informal surveys were collected, some online due to COVID but many done face to face in the rural disadvantaged areas. These face-to-face surveys were conducted in English or Spanish depending on the stated desires of the residents.
Seven in-person workshops throughout the country plus one virtual workshop were held. These meetings typically included transportation, food, and child care to ensure disadvantaged community members had the opportunity to fully participate.
Attendance and presentations at various community events throughout the County, including disadvantaged communities
Multiple presentations at the FCTA Board, the Board of Supervisors meetings, Fresno Councilof Governments, and at every incorporated City within the County.
As you can see, FCTA takes their public engagement responsibilities very seriously and additional Board members are not required in order to ensure that disadvantaged communities are represented in the process. As noted above, the makeup of the existing FCTA Board ensures that everyone in the County is represented. Almost all of rural Fresno County is considered disadvantaged as well as much of the urban area. Supervisors, Councilmembers, and Mayors are elected to represent all of their constituents within Fresno County. With rare exception, each of these electedofficials represent disadvantaged areas and people. Further, these elected Board members are accountable to the people who elect them. That accountability does not exist with non-elected appointed Board members. As you are aware, local sales 1 This polling sample size is unprecedented in Fresno County and larger than almost all other local transportation measure polls conducted throughout California.
98 Section 7, Item D.
AB 558
April 7, 2023
tax measures are a careful balancing act that must consider the needs of the entire county in order to achieve the necessary two-thirds voter threshold. Because certain communities feel as though not enough investment was promised to them is not a reason to overhaul the FCTA Board, but rather an opportunity to engage through the public engagement process during the next attempt to extend Measure C. A full description of the Measure C Renewal public engagement effort is also attached to this letter.
In response to AB 558’s requirement to apply prevailing wage requirements, it is important to understand what Measure C does, how the money is allocated, and what is covered by existing prevailing wage requirements. Measure C’s major programs along with the current prevailing wage requirements are outlined in the following table:
PROGRAM Percentage of
Measure
Prevailing Wage Requirements
Regional Transportation Improvement
Program
30.5% Public Works projects, 100% prevailing wage.
Local Transportation Program, Street
Maintenance
15% Mostly public works projects which are
subject to prevailing wage. Some pavement
repairs done with in-house city/county
maintenance crews. Most/all are union
employees subject to prevailing wage
Local Transportation Program, Flexible and
Bike/Ped/ADA
19.5% Traffic signals, ped and bike facilities, safety
improvements, etc. Nearly all public works
projects (100% prevailing wage) with some
minor work performed by in-house (union)
staff.
Grade Separation Program 6% Public Works Projects 100% prevailing wage.
Public Transit Program 24% Transit projects are public works projects and subject to prevailing wage. Vast majority of
funding covers transit operations. Most
transit employees are union and subject to
prevailing wage
Environmental Enhancement Program 3.5% School Bus Replacements subject to public purchasing requirements. TOD incentive
projects are typically public works projects
and subject to prevailing wage.
Administration 1.5% No prevailing wage requirements
As you can see, the addition of the prevailing wage language is unnecessary as there is little in Measure C that isn’t covered and all public works projects, state and local, are already covered by Section 1720 of the California Labor Code.
Finally, every project or program funded by Measure C is subject to a CEQA analysis. Some programs do not have CEQA implications and are legally exempt. All major projects do undergo a CEQA (and in most cases National Environmental Policy Act NEPA) analysis. Again, AB 558 unnecessarily re-states existing law.
In closing, we would like to reiterate that AB 588 is looking for a problem that simply does not exist.
Within the framework of our existing measure, the FCTA Board has very little discretion in how funds are allocated, and which projects are funded, as the funding allocations and projects were set by voters in 99 Section 7, Item D.
AB 558
April 7, 2023
the 2006 Expenditure Plan, and local projects are exclusively at the discretion of the County’ s various local agencies. FCTA has no role in which local projects are selected because those decisions are made by the cities themselves or the Board of Supervisors. Almost 60% of Measure C revenues are local agency pass through funds with no FCTA oversite except to ensure, through audits, that the expenditures were consistent with the program requirements. Another 30% are project specific funds included in the 2006 Expenditure Plan. There are two small grant programs totaling about 3% of the entire Measure C program that the FCTA Board makes funding decisions based on technical evaluation performed by local agency staff.
Our local governance structure was affirmed by local voters, should remain a local issue for the current Measure and any future measures. If you have any questions, please contact me [email protected].
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mike Leonardo
Executive Director
Fresno County Transportation Authority
cc: The Honorable Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, Chair, Assembly Committee on Local Government The Honorable Jim Patterson, Assemblymember, 8th District The Honorable Devon Mathis, Assemblymember, 33rd District The Honorable Esmerelda Soria, Assemblymember, 27th District The Honorable Shannon Grove, Senator, 12th District
The Honorable Anna Caballero, Senator, 14th District
The Honorable Melissa Hurtado, Senator, 16th District
100
Section 7, Item D.
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 26, 2023
PRESENTER: John Jansons, City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation and discussion with possible direction of staff of Fiscal Year 23 -24 City Council Priorities, Goals and Staff Work Plan Alignment (JAJ) RECOMMENDATION: City Council receive presentation by staff to identify and discuss proposed priorities, projects, goals and alignment of Departmental work plans pursuant to the approval and direction of the City Council for Fiscal Year 23-24.
DISCUSSION: Annually, and throughout the year, the organization benefits from identifying goals and priorities of the City Council alongside the necessities of daily work by the Departments to ensure organizational alignment.
Staff’s presentation will review the current, ongoing projects that City is working toward completing, and present new responsibilities that are projected for the coming year for City Council’s consideration, comment and direction.
Staff also seeks City Council comment on proposed activities and identification of any additional priority projects or initiatives that Council believes should be considered for Fiscal Year 23 -24 as resources may allow.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
101
Section 7, Item F.