Agenda packet, regular meeting, second session — King City City Council, June 25, 2024

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CITY OF KING CITY COUNCIL
AND
Sitting as SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF

THE RDA FOR THE CITY OF KING
TUESDAY JUNE 25, 2024
6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL
212 S. VANDERHURST AVENUE
KING CITY, CALIFORNIA 93930
The City Council meeting will be conducted in hybrid in-person/virtual format.

To join the meeting virtually, please use the link below to join the Zoom meeting:
https://bit.ly/3e0zvaR
Meeting ID: 881 5287 9536
Or by telephone: 1-669-900-9128
Passcode: 052933
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, Please contact the City Clerk's Office (831-386-5925) at least 48 hours prior to the Meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* Please submit all correspondence for City Council PRIOR to the meeting with a copy to the City Clerk.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Coucil Members Oscar Avalos, Carlos DeLeon, Robert Cullen, Mayor Pro Tem Carlos Victoria, and Mayor Mike LeBarre

FLAG SALUTE

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Recognition Of Russ Nichols For Retirement As King City Fire Chief

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. A.

6. Recognition Of Russ Nichols For Retirement As King City Fire Chief

PUBLIC COMMENT
Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes’ total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council that is not on the agenda. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda. Comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not to any individual Council Member.

Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member, staff member or member of the audience is not permitted.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS & COMMITTEE REPORTS
Individual Council Members may comment on Council business, his or her Council activities, City operations, projects or other items of community interest. Council Members may also request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting on any matter or take action to direct staff to prepare a staff report for a future agenda.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Comments presented by the City Manager, City Attorney or other staff on City business and/or announcements.

CONSENT AGENDA
The following items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Members of the audience may speak on any item(s) listed on the Consent Agenda. Any Council Member, the City Manager, or the City Attorney may request that an item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to allow for full discussion. The Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion. Items withdrawn from the Consent Agenda may be considered by separate motions at the conclusion of the discussion of each item.

Consideration: Meeting Minutes Of June 11, 2024 City Council Meeting Recommendation: approve and file.
9(A) JUNE 11, 2024 MINUTES_.PDF
Consideration: City Of King Check Register June 1 Through June 15, 2024 Recommendation: receive and file.
9(B) STAFF REPORT CC CITY AP 062424 (002).PDF
Consideration: FY 2024-25 Job Classification Plan
Recommendation: adopt a Resolution approving the FY 2024-25 Job Classification Plan.
9(C) JOB CLASSIFICATION PLAN.PDF
Consideration: Side Letter Of Agreement With The Service Employees International Union Local 521
Recommendation: approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Sixth Side Letter of Agreement with the Service Employees International Union Local 521 (SEIU) to correct errors found in the salary tables included in the Fifth Side Letter of Agreement.
9(D) SEIU 6TH SIDE LETTERPDF
A.

6. 7.

8. 9.

Documents:

Letter of Agreement with the Service Employees International Union Local 521 (SEIU) to correct errors found in the salary tables included in the Fifth Side Letter of Agreement.
9(D) SEIU 6TH SIDE LETTER.PDF
Consideration: Confirmation Of Election Of King City Volunteer Fire Department Officers And Engineers
Recommendation: 1) approve confirmation of the election of the following 2024-25 King City Volunteer Fire Department Officers; 2) approve appointment of the following Chief Engineer and First Assistant Engineer; and 3) approve confirmation of other following engineer positions:
l Chief: Matthew Owens
l First Assistant Chief: Michael Hearne
l Second Assistant Chief: John Nuno
l Secretary/Treasurer: Mark Phillips
l Chief Engineer: Steve Rianda
l First Assistant Engineer: George Young
l Second Assistant Engineer: Ty Caulk
l Third Assistant Engineer: Robert Eddington
l Fourth Assistant Engineer: Mark Silveira
l Fifth Assistant Engineer: Joseph Kerr
l Sixth Assistant Engineer: Carlos Perez, Jr.
l Seventh Assistant Engineer: Izzy Silva
9(E) VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS AND ENGINEERS.PDF Consideration: Application For Mutual Of Omaha Dental And Vision Insurance Plan Recommendation: authorize the City Manager to submit an application and execute a change to the City's employee dental and vision insurance plan to enroll in the Mutual of Omaha Plan.
9(F) DENTAL AND VISION INSURANCE.PDF
Consideration: Annual Grid Assure Agreement For Fiscal Year 2024-25 With Surveillance Grid Integration, Inc. For The Service And Maintenance Of The Citywide Security Camera Network
Recommendation: approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the annual GRID ASSURE service agreement with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. for the service and maintenance of the citywide security camera network. 9(G) GRIDASSURE 2024 STAFF REPORT .PDF

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Consideration: Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District Annual Assessments For Fiscal Year 2024-25
Recommendation: open the Public Hearing to accept public testimony regarding the levy and collection of assessments for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District, close the public hearing, and adopt Resolution No. 2024-4998 approving the report and ordering the levy and collection of assessments for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California Documents:

Documents:

10. A.

For Fiscal Year 202425
Recommendation: open the Public Hearing to accept public testimony regarding the levy and collection of assessments for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District, close the public hearing, and adopt Resolution No. 2024-4998 approving the report and ordering the levy and collection of assessments for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California 10(A) SR 2ND RIVERVIEW GARDENS STAFF REPORT FY 2024-2025 .PDF

REGULAR BUSINESS
Consideration: Adjustments To The FY 2024-25 Budget
Recommendation: 1) approve the recommended adjustments to the FY 2024-25 Budget; and 2) adopt a Resolution establishing the appropriation limit from tax proceeds for FY 2024-25.
11(A) BUDGET REPORT.PDF

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
Announcement(s) of any reportable action(s) taken in Closed Session will be made in open session and repeated at the beginning of the next Regular City Council meeting as this portion of the meeting is not recorded.

ADJOURNMENT
The City of King Is An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Documents:

11. A.

Documents:

12. 13.

Page 1 of 2 ends

City Council Meeting
June 11, 2024

1.__CALL TO ORDER:

Regular Meeting called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor LeBarre.

2.__ROLL CALL:

City Council: Mayor Mike LeBarre, Council member Carlos DeLeon, Mayor Pro Tem Carlos Victoria, Council member Rob Cullen absent, Council members Oscar Avalos absent.

City Staff: City Manager Steve Adams; City Attorney Roy Santos; City Clerk, Erica Sonne.

3.__FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Mayor LeBarre.

4. CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

None

5.__SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:

A. Mayor’s Commendation to Phoebe and Dr. Tim Cheney for their contributions to the city.

6. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS:

None

7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member DeLeon had nothing to report this evening.

Mayor Pro Tem Victoria announced the death of a former officer Abe Aguayo.

Mayor LeBarre stated he received a call from Tina Lopez, and they have been named a Blue Zone Market, the first in Monterey County. Congratulations to them.

8. CITY STAFF REPORTS AND COMMENTS:

City Manager Adams stated the first Blue zones walk of the season went well. Leah Amaya’s last day with us is tomorrow. Alica Trujillo’s our new Event Coordinator/Recreation Assistant’s first day was Monday.

City Attorney Santos had nothing to report tonight.

9. CONSENT
A. Consideration: Meeting Minutes of May 28, 2024, Council Meeting B. Consideration: City of King Check Register May 15, through May 31, 2024 C. Consideration: Animal Sheltering Services Agreement with SPCA of Monterey County D. Consideration: Resolution for the 2024 General Municipal Election E. Consideration: Miscellaneous Sidewalk Repairs Project, Including Adopting Finding of a Categorical Exemption, Pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines F. Consideration: Successor Agency Check Register May 16, 2024 Through May 31, 2024 G. Consideration: Public Financing Authority Check Register May 16, 2024 Through May 31, 2024 H. Consideration: City of King KCCP Payments for the Month of May 2024 9(A)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Action: Motion to approve consent agenda items A-H by Victoria seconded by DeLeon.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Victoria,
NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members: Cullen, Avalos
ABSTAIN: Council Members:

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

None

11. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. Consideration: Draft Sales Tax Measure Language
City Manager Adams introduced this item with a PowerPoint presentation.

Mayor LeBarre feels the ballot measure could be shortened and will send his comments to the City Manager.

Karen Jernigan feels that the Sales tax is the most fair. She would like to see the council promoting it so it passes.

Council member DeLeon really likes the language of the last paragraph in the ballot argument. He would like to see the video released again on the unfunded needs and have it pinned to the top of the page.

B. Consideration: 2024 Community Opinion Survey Results City Manager Adams introduced this item with a PowerPoint presentation.

The survey shows improvement from every survey except 2020.

The Mayor would like to see the percentage of Spanish speaking survey’s the next survey.

12. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 one case: Higuera/Murillo v. City of King
B. Public Employee Performance Evaluation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957:

Title: City Manager
ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor LeBarre adjourned the meeting at 6:38p.m.

Approved Signatures:

Mayor Mike LeBarre City Clerk, Erica Sonne
City of King City of King
Item No. 9(B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 26, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF KING CHECK REGISTER JUNE
1 THROUGH JUNE 15, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council receive and file.

BACKGROUND:

At least once a month, the City Treasurer shall submit to the City Council, a copy of the invoices paid for the previous month.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this item is to provide the Council an opportunity to review and monitor ongoing expenditures. These documents are attached.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

No Environmental Review required for this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Receive and file the report; or

2. Provide other direction to staff regarding requests for additional information.

KING CITY CITY HALL
Check Register Report
Check
Date
Check
Number
Status Amount
June 1 -15, 2024
BANK:

Vendor
Number Vendor Name Check Description
WELLS FARGO BANK Page: 1
Time: 6:55 am
Date: 06/17/2024
Void/Stop
Date
Reconcile
Date
WELLS FARGO BANK Checks
71324 06/07/24 Printed ADAMSS STEVEN ADAMS Mileage Reimb. 5/17/24 MBAMG 5/24/24 80.40 Mont.County Bus.Counc
71325 06/07/24 Printed KCTVHARD ALCANTAR HARDWARE INC Graffitti Cover Supplies 163.46 ALL-TEMP REFRIGERATION 5,206.95

HEATING
71326 06/07/24 Printed ALLTE Baseball Lights
ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY 1,586.17
GROUP
71327 06/07/24 Printed ALVAREZL Computer Lease
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1,537.49
INC
71328 06/07/24 Printed AMAZON Office Supplies Printer Refill 71329 06/07/24 Printed AT & T AT & T Phone-831 386-9066 718 1 279.77 71330 06/07/24 Printed AT & T-FIR AT & T MOBILITY City Cell Phones-61644135 225.15 71331 06/07/24 Printed BENITEZJ JESUS BENITEZ Security Services Monarch Inn Homeless 2,784.00 Shelter
71332 06/07/24 Printed BRUCE SCOTT CRAIG BRUCE Planning 2,940.00 CALIFORNIA PARK & 170.00

RECREATION
71333 06/07/24 Printed CPRSM CPRS Membership-#147815
CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,588.25

COMPANY
71334 06/07/24 Printed CASCADE Fire Protection Covers
71335 06/07/24 Printed SAME DAY S CHARLES C. SALMINA Shred Bins 120.00 71336 06/07/24 Printed COASTAL COASTAL TRACTOR Parts For Loader 432.37 71337 06/07/24 Printed DIMES MEDI DIMES MEDIA CORPORATION Advertisement 216.66 71338 06/07/24 Printed ENGIE ENGIE SERVICES US INC KC M&V Renewal Fee 22,278.00 71339 06/07/24 Printed ESPINOLOR LORENZO ESPINO JR Training 2,800.00 71340 06/07/24 Printed GREEN ACCT GREENS ACCOUNTING Finance Services-Feb. 2024 15,177.96 71341 06/07/24 Printed GREEN ACCT GREENS ACCOUNTING Finance Services-March 2024 14,500.24 71342 06/07/24 Printed GREEN ACCT GREENS ACCOUNTING Finance Services-April 2024 20,683.48 71343 06/07/24 Printed GENERAL CO ICC CODIFICATION, INC Supplement Print #99 Muni Code 117.50 KETTLE CREEK 7,166.29

CORPORATION
71344 06/07/24 Printed KETTLE CRE Trash & Recycling Receptacles For City & San Antonio Parks
KIMLEY-HORN & 23,668.55

ASSOCIATES INC
71345 06/07/24 Printed KIMLEY-HOR Land Use
LEXISNEXIS RISK 164.06

SOLUTIONS FL I
71346 06/07/24 Printed LEXISN Software
71347 06/07/24 Printed LINCOLN LINCOLN AQUATICS Pool Chemicals 1,487.59 71348 06/07/24 Printed MONARCH IN MELDI LLC Temporary Homeless Shelter 49,658.00 6/10/24-7/10/24
71349 06/07/24 Printed MNS ENGINE MNS ENGINEERS, INC. Phase 3 Nino Homes Professional Srvcs 2,690.00 April 2024
71350 06/07/24 Printed NEWSV NEW SV MEDIA INC Ordinance Notice Of Adoption Nuno Iron 631.19 Public Hearing
71351 06/07/24 Printed O'REILLY A O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC Headlight #114 33.05 71352 06/07/24 Printed OFFICE DEP OFFICE DEPOT Breakroom Supplies 65.04 71353 06/07/24 Printed PGESOL PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Damages-1001 Industrial Way 4,945.86 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 8.65
CO
71354 06/07/24 Printed PG&E Electricity-3845488588-0
PARTS & SERVICE CTR- NAPA 42.38
INC
71355 06/07/24 Printed PARTS & SE Def For Rented Tractor PENINSULA PURE WATER 49.20
INC
71356 06/07/24 Printed PURE WATER City Hall Water
71357 06/07/24 Printed PBGFS PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL Postage Meter A/C#0012318799 186.50 PURCHASE POWER*PITNEY 1,188.60
BOWES
71358 06/07/24 Printed PURCHASE P Postage-8000-9000-0111-3376 71359 06/07/24 Printed QUILL CORP QUILL CORPORATION Breakroom Supplies 158.97 71360 06/07/24 Printed RAINBOW RAINBOW PRINTING Property Violation Stickers 269.70 71361 06/07/24 Printed RAZZOLINK RAZZO LINK INC City Power Web 34.90 71362 06/07/24 Printed REISS REISS DESIGN STUDIO, City Hall Remodel Design Cost Estim. 7,077.83 Homekey Proj
71363 06/07/24 Printed ORTIZ'S TR JOSE LUIS ORTIZ ROCHA Tree Service 900.00 71364 06/07/24 Printed RODRIDA DANIA RODRIGUEZ Umpire 4 $ $35 210.00 71365 06/07/24 Printed STATE WATE STATE WATER RESOURCE Grade I Renewal-Paulino Maya-Roque 150.00 71366 06/07/24 Printed T - MOBILE T-MOBILE USA, INC Homicide Case 100.00 71367 06/07/24 Printed EDJONES THE ED JONES CO INC Dow Retirement Badge 291.23

KING CITY CITY HALL
Check Register Report
Check
Date
Check
Number
Status Amount
June 1 -15, 2024
BANK:

Vendor
Number Vendor Name Check Description
WELLS FARGO BANK Page: 2
Time: 6:55 am
Date: 06/17/2024
Void/Stop
Date
Reconcile
Date
WELLS FARGO BANK Checks
71368 06/07/24 Printed TORRES ELE JOSE G TORRES Facade Grant Final Payment 301 1,185.00 Broadway
71369 06/07/24 Printed TYLER TECH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC System Conversion 1,040.00 US BANCORP EQUIPMENT 244.08

FINANCE
71370 06/07/24 Printed U.S. BANCO Konica Printer Contract VALLEY SAW & GARDEN 2,701.54

EQUIPMENT
71371 06/07/24 Printed VALLEY SAW Weed Eaters
71372 06/07/24 Printed VERIZON WI VERIZON WIRELESS MDT's-842068026-00001 494.13 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID 5,000.00
WASTE
71373 06/11/24 Printed SVSWA Cal Recycle Grant Pass Through Total Checks: 50 Checks Total (excluding void checks): 205,730.19 WELLS FARGO BANK EFTs
1065667 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 A & W ALESHIRE & WYNDER LLP Legal Services-Shangri Litigation 15,266.64 ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY 6,900.55

GROUP INC
1065668 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 ALVAREZ IT Services-Tyler Installation 1065669 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 CARMEL FIR ART BLACK Annual Fire Inspections 3,750.00 1065670 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 CSGCON CSG CONSULTANTS INC Building Official Services 12,750.75 1065671 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 MAGICC NORMA L DOMINGUEZ Parks & City Janitorial Services 7,040.00 1065672 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 EIKHOF EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP INC April 2024 Golf Course Rehabilitation 20,697.50 GONZALES IRRIGATION 422.57

SYSTEMS
1065673 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 GIS Landscaping Supplies 1065674 06/07/24 Void 06/07/24 Void Check 0.00
1065675 06/07/24 Void 06/07/24 Void Check 0.00
1065676 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 LA HEARNE LA HEARNE COMPANY Finance Charge 1,741.38 1065677 06/07/24 Void 06/07/24 Void Check 0.00
1065678 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 SMITHE SMITH & ENRIGHT Riverview Landscape-Feb 2024 12,460.00 Maintenance
1065679 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 SPECTRUMT SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE Internet-113362301 1,228.88 1065680 06/07/24 Reconciled 06/07/24 TORO TORO PETROLEUM CORP Fuel 2,843.13 Total EFTs: 14 EFTs Total (excluding void checks): 85,101.40 Total Payments: 64 Bank Total (excluding void checks): 290,831.59 Total Payments: 64 Grand Total (excluding void checks): 290,831.59 Item No. 9 (C)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF FY 2024-25 JOB CLASSIFICATION PLAN RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the FY 2024-25 Job Classification Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The City maintains a Job Classification Plan that sets forth all existing job classifications and salary ranges. It is also a requirement of CalPERS that the City Council adopt on an annual basis the City’s Salary Classification Plan.

DISCUSSION:

The FY 2024-25 Job Classification Plan incorporates the salary increases approved in the labor agreements and side letter of agreements with each of the City’s unions and represented groups and authorized adjustments to department director and city manager salaries. The proposed plan also includes a recommended increase to the Police Officer Recruit salary by the same percentage increase applied to the Police Officer classification, a 5% increase in the pay rate for Fire Department officers, and an increase in the per call pay for firefighters from $18 to $19.

COST ANALYSIS:

The increases have all been incorporated into the FY 2024-25 Budget so not additional appropriation is needed.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-4999

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING
APPROVING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR FY 2024-25
WHEREAS, the City of King maintains job descriptions for each position and a Classification Plan that sets forth all existing job classifications and salary steps; and WHEREAS, adoption of an annual Classification Plan is required by CalPERS; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make changes to the Classification Plan to incorporate cost of living adjustments approved for each labor group through the meet and confer process consistent with the each of the Memorandums of Understanding and for executive positions.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of King approves the FY 2024-25 Classification Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

This resolution was passed and adopted this 25
th day of June, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES, Council Members:

NAYS, Council Members:

ABSENT, Council Members:

ABSTAIN, Council Members:

APPROVED:

Mike LeBarre, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Roy Santos, City Attorney

Item No. 9 (D)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH

THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL
521
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Sixth Side Letter of Agreement with the Service Employees International Union Local 521 (SEIU) to correct errors found in the salary tables included in the Fifth Side Letter of Agreement.

BACKGROUND:

At the March 12, 2024 meeting, the City Council approved a Fifth Side Letter of Agreement with SEIU to implement salary equity adjustments for certain positions and to extend the term of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

When staff was updating the Classification Plan, two errors were discovered in the salary tables included in the Side Letter of Agreement. Staff is recommending a Sixth Side Letter of Agreement be approved so the City has a documented record of the change and an accurate approved MOU.

DISCUSSION:

The corrections include inserting the salary range of the Police Records Technician into two tables where it was missing and updating the Code Enforcement Officer salary to include an equity adjustment that was approved last year. Actual pay has been set utilizing the table in the Classification Plan, which is accurate. Therefore, the error has not had any impact on employees’ actual pay.

Exhibit 1

Item No. 9 (E)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CONFIRMATION OF ELECTION OF KING

CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS AND

ENGINEERS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) approve confirmation of the election of the following 2024-25 King City Volunteer Fire Department Officers; 2) approve appointment of the following Chief Engineer and First Assistant Engineer; and 3) approve confirmation of other following engineer positions:
• Chief: Matthew Owens
• First Assistant Chief: Michael Hearne
• Second Assistant Chief: John Nuno
• Secretary/Treasurer: Mark Phillips
• Chief Engineer: Steve Rianda
• First Assistant Engineer: George Young
• Second Assistant Engineer: Ty Caulk
• Third Assistant Engineer: Robert Eddington
• Fourth Assistant Engineer: Mark Silveira
• Fifth Assistant Engineer: Joseph Kerr
• Sixth Assistant Engineer: Carlos Perez, Jr.
• Seventh Assistant Engineer: Izzy Silva
BACKGROUND:

Section 2.20.030 of the King City Municipal Code sets forth that Fire Chief, First Assistant Chief, Second Assistant Chief, Secretary and Treasurer shall be elected from among the members of the Volunteer Fire Department and subject to confirmation by the City Council. The election is to be held on the first Tuesday in June of each year and the confirmation shall take place at the first meeting of the City Council following the election.

Item No. 9 (F)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR MUTUAL OF OMAHA

DENTAL AND VISION INSURANCE PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council authorize the City Manager to submit an application and execute a change to the City’s employee dental and vision insurance plan to enroll in the Mutual of Omaha Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s current employee dental and vision insurance plan is up for renewal on July 1
st. The City is currently enrolled in a Sun Life Financial plan. The City’s insurance broker is 28 Insurance. Prior to each renewal period, they solicit quotes from different providers and present staff with an analysis of options.

DISCUSSION:

The City has the option of extending the current plan, which is being offered at no cost increase. However, a proposal has been received by Mutual of Omaha, which is lower cost, improved benefits, and a larger network of providers. In addition, the rates are guaranteed for a 2-year period. All City employees were asked to check with their current providers to confirm they participate in the Mutual of Omaha’s provider network, and no employees expressed a concern with the proposed change.

Therefore, staff recommend changing the City’s dental and vision plan to Mutual of Omaha. City Council is asked to authorize the City Manager to proceed with the process of changing insurance providers.

Item No. 9 (G)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMES HUNT, CHIEF OF POLICE
RE: CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL GRID ASSURE AGREEMENT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 WITH SURVEILLANCE GRID
INTEGRATION INC. FOR THE SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE

OF THE CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERA NETWORK
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the annual GRID ASSURE service agreement with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. for the service and maintenance of the citywide security camera network.

BACKGROUND:

Starting with the installation of the first security cameras in 2017, King City has invested heavily in installing and maintaining a robust citywide security camera network to protect its residents and assist in criminal investigations. Currently, the network has a total of 110 security cameras offering 316 total views.

Numerous crimes have been solved using video footage provided by the security camera system.

Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. was selected to install and maintain the system through a request for proposal process. They have been the sole provider for the installation of security cameras and the service and maintenance of the security camera network since the inception of the project. The current service and maintenance agreement (GRID ASSURE) with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. was approved by City Council on May 23, 2023 and expires on June 30, 2024.

DISCUSSION:

King City has contracted with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. since November 2017 for the installation of security cameras at various locations throughout the

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL GRID ASSURE AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 WITH SURVEILANCE GRID INTEGRATION INC. FOR THE

SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERA

NETWORK
JUNE 25, 2024
PAGE 2 OF 3
City. The cameras were installed in phases with the last phase (Phase 3.2) installed in the summer of 2023. King City also contracted with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. for the service and maintenance of the security camera network through the GRID ASSURE agreement. The current GRID ASSURE agreement with Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. covers Fiscal Year 2023-24. The total cost of this agreement was $62,996 and the services covered in this agreement include:
• Network monitoring.
• Clean and service cameras bi-annually.
• Next day response for identified problems.
• Remote management of servers.
• Annual subscriptions to BriefCam & ExacqVision.
• Annual license maintenance and updates.

Since this agreement was approved, Phase 3.2 of the security camera network upgrade was implemented. Phase 3.2 included the installation of additional cameras in the City Hall complex, select city parks, the library, and other high value intersections and streets. Phase 3.2 also accounted for necessary technological upgrades, including the purchase of additional BriefCam licenses and Motorola Vigilant software subscriptions allowing officers to receive notifications when stolen vehicles enter the city. The initial annual subscription fees for the Vigilant licenses were included in the price of Phase 3.2. The security camera network servers were upgraded as well.

As the current GRID ASSURE agreement is due to expire, Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. submitted a quote for GRID ASSURE for fiscal year 2024/2025.

The quoted price is $75,549.25 and includes the services enumerated above with allowances for the additional cameras added during Phase 3.2 plus the additional expense associated with the annual licenses for the Motorola Vigilant software.

The increase in cost is primarily due to the increase in cameras.

COST ANALYSIS:

The projected expenditure for GRID ASSURE for FY 2024-2025 is $75,549.25 which will be paid for using available funds from the General Fund and SLESF’s Fund.

01222.0001/923571.1 1

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF KING AND
___________________
THIS CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 26th day of June, 2024, by and between the CITY OF KING, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. (herein “Consultant”).

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall perform the work or services set forth in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant warrants that it has the experience and ability to perform all work and services required hereunder and that it shall diligently perform such work and services in a professional and satisfactory manner.

1.2 Compliance With Law. All work and services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction.

1.3 California Labor Law. If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by the Agreement.

2. COMPENSATION

2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Seventy-Four Thousand Three Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars ($74,368) (“Contract Sum”).

2.2 Invoices. Twice annually (July and January) Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement.

The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “B”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be EXHIBIT 1
2 01222.0001/923571.1
detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by the City of any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.3 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual cost of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum but not exceeding a total contract amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or in the time to perform of up to ninety (90) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. No claim for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

3. COORDINATION OF WORK

3.1 Representative of Consultant. Warren Hackbarth is hereby designated as being the representative of Consultant authorized to act on its behalf with respect to the work and services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith. All personnel of Consultant and any authorized agents shall be under the exclusive direction of the representative of Consultant. Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, and shall keep City informed of any changes.

3.2 Contract Officer. The Chief of Police [or such person as may be designated by the City Manager] is hereby designated as being the representative the City authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith (“Contract Officer”).

3.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. Consultant shall not contract with any entity to perform in whole or in part the work or services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Any such prohibited assignment or transfer shall be void. 3 01222.0001/923571.1

3.4 Independent Consultant. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City, or that it is a member of a joint enterprise with City. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to the City pursuant to this Agreement are classified by Consultant as employees and that Consultant issues or will issue a W-2 to such personnel.

In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, subcontractor, or independent contractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) to be classified as other than an independent contractor for the City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to the City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant or any of Consultant’s personnel used to provide the Services under this Agreement are other than independent contractors of the City.

4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Insurance Coverages. Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, nonowned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. 4 01222.0001/923571.1
(d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein.

4.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants. (c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to 5 01222.0001/923571.1
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. (i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.
(j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change 6 01222.0001/923571.1
results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
(o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
(q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

4.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, except claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services and shall keep such records for a period of three years following completion of the services hereunder. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records.

5.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement or as the Contract Officer shall require.

5.3 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
7 01222.0001/923571.1
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than the City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives the City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then the City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify the City should Consultant be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. The City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with the City and to provide the City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant.

5.4 Ownership of Documents. All studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by the City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder.

Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.

6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

6.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to 8 01222.0001/923571.1
Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article.

6.3 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et. seq. and 910 et. seq., in order to pursue any legal action under this Agreement.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

6.4 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder, but not exceeding the compensation provided therefore in the Schedule of Compensation Exhibit “C”. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

6.5 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City 9 01222.0001/923571.1
may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7. MISCELLANEOUS

7.1 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class.

7.2 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount, which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

7.3 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of King, 212 S. Vanderhurst Ave., King City, California 93930, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

7.4 Integration; Amendment. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing.

7.5 Severability. In the event that part of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

7.6 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A party’s consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party’s consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
10 01222.0001/923571.1

7.7 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which any be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, whether or not the matter proceeds to judgment.

7.8 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

7.9 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

7.10 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______

7.11 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[Signatures On The Following Page]
11 01222.0001/923571.1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF KING, a municipal corporation
Steven Adams, City Manager
ATTEST:

Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
Roy C. Santos, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:

By:

Warren Hackbarth
Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S

SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE

INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. 01222.0001/923571.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2024 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. 01222.0001/923571.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following services:

A. See attached GRIDASSURE Scope of Services.

II. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City updated of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

A. Weekly security camera network performance reports.

III. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

B-1
01222.0001/923571.1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant will submit bi-annual (July and January) invoices.

II. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. The invoices will include:

A. July Invoice (Attached):
• One-half (1/2) of the annual GRIDASSURE program charges. • Annual subscriptions and licenses for ExacqVision, BriefCam and Vigilant Software.

B. January invoice (Attached):
• One-half (1/2) of the annual GRIDASSURE program charges.

III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

Item No. 10(A)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Date: JUNE 25, 2024
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
From: MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL

ASSESSMENT REPORT AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE RIVERVIEW GARDENS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No 2024-4998, approving the Final Engineers Report and ordering the levy and collection of assessments for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District, pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.

Background:

The Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District was formed in 1998, for the purpose of providing maintenance services to landscaping and appurtenant improvements for the Riverview Gardens development and assessing those properties which benefit from this service. Each year the City Council must, by law, order the preparation of an Engineer's Report describing the existing and proposed maintenance services and conduct a public hearing to establish and order the amount of assessment for the next fiscal year.

At the time the District was formed, the engineer included an annual assessment adjustment equal to the April Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco-OaklandHayward areas (“CPI”). Each year since the District was formed, a new maximum assessment was established by applying the April CPI to the Maximum Assessment for the prior year. The City may assess the District parcels any amount up to the established Maximum Assessment for that year, but may not exceed that amount. Included in the Engineer’s Report is a table showing the Maximum Assessment and the Actual Assessment for each year since the District was formed.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT

REPORT AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR

THE RIVERVIEW GARDENS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
JUNE 25, 2023
PAGE 2 OF 3
At the first Council meeting for this item, Council approved a rate based on a 5% CPI adjustment. The actual April 2024 CPI is 3.76%. This requires that the initially approved assessment rate of $478.56, be reduced to $472.94. The reduced assessment rate, reflecting the actual April CPI, has been updated in the attached Engineer’s Report.

DISCUSSION:

On April 23, 2024 the City Council adopted Resolutions to provide notice to the members of the District and citizens of the City of King of the City’s intent to again levy and collect assessments fees for the previously formed landscaping and lighting district. In addition, the Resolutions establish that the City Council: (1) finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and (2) declares its intention, to order the levy of and to collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of property within an existing assessment district pursuant to the provisions of the Act for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Resolution.

The District is designated as the “Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District” (“District”). The District was established to fund the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements, which primarily consist of the landscaped areas on Willow Street east of San Antonio Drive. The properties within the District are assessed annually through the Monterey County tax roll.

COST ANALYSIS:

The costs to maintain and service the improvements for Fiscal Year 2024-25 have been estimated at $21,283.30. This includes contract services for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements, utilities, engineering and administrative costs, Monterey County charges, and reserve collections. Each of the 45 parcels in the District benefits equally from the improvements and as a result, each parcel is assessed the same amount. For Fiscal Year 2024-25, that amount is $472.94. If the assessments are not charged to the properties within the District, the costs to maintain the improvements will have to be funded in some other way.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The resolution is not a project within the meaning of Section 15378 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly. Most of the terms and scope of city discretion are guided by existing State and Federal law. The resolution declares the City’s intent to levy and collect assessment fees. The resolution does not authorize any specific development or installation on any specific piece of property within

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-4998

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING AMENDING AND/OR

APPROVING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE RIVERVIEW GARDENS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of King has, by previous Resolutions, initiated proceedings and declared its intention to levy and collect annual assessments in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “1972 Act”). Said special maintenance district is known and designated as Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District, (the “District”);
WHEREAS, at this time all notice and Public Hearing requirements as required by the 1972 Act and Proposition 218 have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) and is now satisfied with the assessments, diagram and all other matters as contained in the Report as it is now submitted for final consideration and approval; and, WHEREAS, the assessments are in compliance with all laws pertaining to the levy of the District assessments; said assessments are levied without regard to property valuation and are in compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218 as the District was approved by a 100% vote of the property owners at the time of formation; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING AS FOLLOWS:

RECITALS
Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2. This City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act and Proposition 218. The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 are not proposed to be increased beyond what was previously authorized at the time of formation of the District.

DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION
Section 3. The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the Report, are hereby approved and confirmed.

Based upon the Report and the testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the proposed assessments:

Exhibit 1
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each assessed parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations, maintenance and servicing of the improvements.
b. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel.
c. Only special benefits have been assessed.

The assessments for the District contained in the Report for Fiscal Year 2024-25 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the assessable lots or parcels within the District in the amounts set forth in the Report.

ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE
Section 4. The public interest and convenience requires and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be performed as said maintenance work is set forth in the Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention.

FILING WITH SECRETARY
Section 5. The above referenced Report shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection.

ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
Section 6. The County Auditor shall enter onto the County Assessment roll, opposite each lot or parcel of land, the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the Report.

COLLECTION AND PAYMENT
Section 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County Taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments.

FISCAL YEAR
Section 8. The assessments as above authorized and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council this 25th day of June 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:
______________________________
Mike Lebarre, Mayor
ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:
___________________________
Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Roy Santos, City Attorney

CITY OF KING
FINAL ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

RIVERVIEW GARDENS LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
JUNE 2024

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
450 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Exhibit 2
Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER….……………………………………………………………..1 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………………………..3 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COSTS………………………………………………………………………………….4 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM…………………………………………………………………………….7 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT………………………………………………………………...8 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL…………………………………………………………………………..12 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT DIAGRAM.………………………………………………………………………...15 Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF KING
PROJECT: RIVERVIEW GARDENS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF KING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District of the City of King to provide landscaping services for each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of King’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for the District. This Report consists of the following Parts:

PART 1
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City and are hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

PART 2
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

PART 3
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the office of the City Clerk. A copy of the District Diagram is included herein as Appendix B.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

2 PART 4
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established Resolution No. 3757 approved on the 19th day of May, 1998.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll
Appendix B – District Diagram
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2024

Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

3 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District was formed for the purpose of ensuring the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of certain landscape improvements within the boundaries of the District. Said improvements are detailed below under “Improvements and Services Provided”.

The Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District is within the boundaries of the City and is located south of Willow Street, east of San Antonio Drive, and generally north of King City high school.

The District is comprised of the residential development known as Riverview Gardens and includes forty-five (45) developed single-family residential parcels.

The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file with the City and are incorporated herein by reference.

IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED
The following are the specific improvements maintained and serviced within the District:
 Landscape maintenance along the Willow Street frontage, including ground cover, shrubs, trees and irrigation system. Landscaping total approximately 12,275 square feet.  Masonry wall maintenance, including graffiti abatement at the entrance to the tract. Masonry wall is 300 linear feet by 6 feet high.
 Utilities including water and electricity for landscaping.

Maintenance includes all necessary repair, service, and replacement of improvements, including the masonry wall, water and electrical energy to run the irrigation system, fertilizer, weeding, debris removal, etc.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

4 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COST
The estimated budget for the annual maintenance and servicing of the improvements and the proportionate share of administration costs of the District have been prepared based on the estimated and recent historical costs of the District.

The estimated 2024-25 District budget is shown below.

ESTIMATE OF COST

DIRECT COSTS
Utility – Water and Electricity $2,700.00
Supplies – Irrigation $265.00
Contract Services – Landscape Maintenance (12,275 sf @0.46/sf) (ex: tree & shrub maintenance and replacement, sprinkler repairs, etc.) $5,540.00
Masonry Wall – Maintenance and Graffiti Abatement $180.00 Professional Services – Public Works (inspection & oversight) $530.00 Direct Costs Sub-Total $9,215.00

ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
Professional Services – Engineer’s Report Preparation $1,575.00 City Administration Fee (10% of Direct Costs) $921.50
County Administration Fee (0.25% of Balance to Assessment) $53.21 Rounding Adjustment (to make an even penny for tax roll purposes) $0.59 Administrative Costs Sub-Total $2,550.30
SUBTOTAL DIRECT AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS $11,765.30
Operating Reserve Collection/(Reduction) $0.00
Capital Reserve Collection/(Reduction) $9,517.00
TOTAL BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $21,282.30
Total Assessable Parcels/Units 45
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER PARCEL/UNIT $472.94
Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

5 The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments or to fund costs which are greater than revenue from the assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. Estimated beginning and ending fund balances for Fiscal Year 2024-25 are shown in the following table.

Section 22569 (a) of the 1972 Act allows the District assessments to “…include a reserve (Operating Reserve) which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the city expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the county, whichever is later.”

DISTRICT FUND BALANCES

OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Estimated Reserve Fund Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2024 $5,882.85 Operating Reserve Collection/(Reduction) – Fiscal Year 2024-25 $0.00 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2025 $5,882.85

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Estimated Reserve Fund Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2024 $14,362.24 Capital Reserve Collection/(Reduction) – Fiscal Year 2024-25 $9,517.00 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance Ending June 30, 2025 $23,879.24 Operating Reserve collections will continue until such time as the fund balance reaches approximately 50% of the annual budget. This is necessary to fund the District costs for the first 6 months of the fiscal year. After the Operating Reserve has been fully funded (50% of annual costs), any future collections will be to maintain the fund balance at the proper level (approximately 50% of the annual Direct Costs).

Capital Reserve collection is intended for the eventual replacement of the masonry wall at the entrance of the development. Masonry walls typically have an expected useful life of approximately 30 years. The wall was installed in 1998, leaving approximately seven years of useful life, as of Fiscal Year 2024-25. The allowable District assessment is insufficient for Capital Reserve collections at this time, but future budgets may include amounts to contribute to the replacement of the masonry wall.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

6 DESCRIPTION OF COST ESTIMATE ITEMS
 Utility – Water & Electricity: The costs to provide water and electrical utilities for the landscaping improvements within the District.
 Supplies – Irrigation: The costs to replace batteries providing electrical power to the irrigation system.
 Contract Services – Landscape Maintenance: The contracting costs associated with performing the landscape maintenance duties associated with the improvements within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021-22 the City hired a landscape contractor to perform these services. Annual costs will be adjusted to reflect the actual contract costs in future years.  Masonry Wall: Costs associated with the maintenance of the masonry wall, including graffiti removal, painting and repairs. This cost is currently equal to $0.10/sf, but may be adjusted as necessary to cover actual costs.
 Professional Services Special – Public Works: Costs associated with individuals within the Public Works Department who contribute time to inspection of the improvements, and oversight of the work performed by the landscape contractor.
 Professional Services – Engineer: The contracting costs associated with hiring a consultant for the preparation of an engineer’s report, resolutions, staff reports, notices, assessment roll and budget.  City Administration Fee: Costs associated with individual City Staff and Management (City Clerk, City Council, City Manager, Finance Director, City Engineer, etc.) who contribute time to the annual administration and oversight of the District, and totals 10% of Direct Costs. This may include but is not limited to, preparation for and attendance of meetings, legal counsel, printing, preparation and posting of public notices, mailing, budgeting, etc.
 County Administration Fee – The County costs related to placement of the annual assessment charges onto the tax roll and the generation of annual tax bills related thereto. This charge is 0.25% of the total amount levied for the District.
 Contingency – This item includes costs related to the unplanned repair or replacement of any of the improvements, including the irrigation system.
 Operating Reserve Collection/(Contribution): This item shows any collections which adds to the Operating Reserve Fund balance, or contributions made from the Operating Reserve Fund, to offset the annual budget.
 Capital Reserve Collection/(Contribution): Collections for replacement costs related to the masonry wall, irrigation system and trees at the end of their useful life or due to accident or natural disaster.  Estimated Reserve Fund Balances: These items show the estimated Operating and Capital Reserve Fund amounts at the beginning and end of the fiscal year. The estimated ending balance reflects any collections or reductions from the estimated beginning balance.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

7 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City, and is hereby made a part hereof by reference.

A copy of the assessment diagram for the District is included in Appendix B of the Report.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

8 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
— Streets and Highways Code Section 22573
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will received different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218, which has been codified as Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposed a number of substantive and procedural requirements on taxes, assessments, and property-related fees imposed by local governments in California.

The method of apportionment described in this Report, and confirmed by the City Council, utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the California Constitution for the allocation of special benefit assessments. The calculation of assessments is based upon the parcel type and the services and improvements provided to equitably apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each lot or parcel. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is over and above any general benefit conferred upon said lots or parcels or to the public at large.

Special Benefit
The improvements and associated costs have been allocated to the assessable properties within the District based upon the special benefit received by those properties. The improvements for which the properties are assessed have been identified as necessary, were installed and are being maintained as part of the development plans specifically for this tract.

As such, the improvements and continuing maintenance and servicing of those improvements are strictly the obligation of the properties within the District. Any benefit to adjacent parcels or passersby is strictly incidental.

General Benefit
Although the improvements may be visible to passersby or to the public at large, the improvements were installed as a requirement of the development of the tract and are for the sole benefit of those properties. It was determined at the time of formation therefore, any access or use by properties or individuals outside the District is completely incidental and the costs of operating, maintaining and servicing said improvements therefore provides no measurable benefit to outside properties or individuals.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

9 Definition of Special Benefit
The method of apportionment described in this Report is based on the premise that each assessable parcel or unit receives distinct and special benefits from the improvements and services provided, including the visual desirability provided by well-maintained landscaping. In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218):
“Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or the public at large” The special benefits associated with local landscaping improvements are specifically:
 Enhanced desirability of properties due to proximity and accessibility of the improvements.  Improved aesthetic appeal provided by a positive representation of the development, neighborhood and the community.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal activity.

ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for this District and was approved by the property owner(s) at the time of formation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the budget and the assessments.

To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, as provided by the following Assessment Range Formula, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed.

A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighting those assessment ballots by the financial obligation of each parcel.

The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel is based on the improvements benefitting the parcels, as well as the use, or type, of each parcel that benefits from said improvements. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the “Per Parcel” method of apportionment. This method, as confirmed by the City Council at the time the District was formed, identifies the fact that all the parcels in the District, each being single family residential, benefit equally from the improvements provided by the District.

The initial maximum assessment for this District was established at the time of formation and was assessed for the first time during the 1998-99 fiscal year. That initial maximum assessment was $221.72 per parcel. This initial maximum assessment has been adjusted each subsequent fiscal year by the following Assessment Range Formula:

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

10  The Maximum Assessment Rate allowed each fiscal year (the “Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate”) shall be based on the initial maximum assessment established in Fiscal Year 1998-99, adjusted annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for the month of April, All Urban Consumers, (“CPI”) for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward area. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City reserves the right to use such revised index or a comparable system to determine fluctuations in the annual cost of living.
 Each fiscal year, the CPI shall be applied to the Maximum Assessment Rate established the previous fiscal year to calculate the appropriate Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year.  If the proposed annual assessment rate (levy per parcel) for the any year is less than or equal to the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate established for that fiscal year then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

Beginning in the second fiscal year after the formation of the District (1999-00) and each fiscal year since, the Maximum Assessment Rate has been recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment Rate has been established for each fiscal year using the Assessment Range Formula described above. Based on the April CPI shown in the table below, the Maximum Assessment Rate for the upcoming fiscal year (2024-25) shall be $472.95.

The Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate has been calculated independent of the annual budget and proposed assessment rate for the given fiscal year. As stated above, if the proposed annual assessment for any fiscal year does not exceed the Adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate for that year, it is not considered to be an increased assessment under the terms of Proposition 218.

The table on the following page shows the annual April CPI increase, the Adjusted Maximum Assessment and the Actual Annual Assessment each year since the formation of the District:

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

11 The City assessed the parcels in the District for the first time in seven years, in Fiscal Year 2019-20, due to the fact that there were no improvements being maintained. The improvements have now been installed and are being maintained and serviced annually.

Fiscal April CPI Adjusted Max. Proposed
Year CPI % Calculation Assessment Assessment
1998-99 N/A N/A $221.72 $221.72
1999-00 4.60% 1.046000000 $231.92 $221.72
2000-01 3.80% 1.038000000 $240.73 $213.60
2001-02 5.80% 1.058000000 $254.69 $229.92
2002-03 2.10% 1.021000000 $260.04 $229.92
2003-04 2.20% 1.022000000 $265.76 $114.96
2004-05 0.50% 1.005000000 $267.09 $114.96
2005-06 2.10% 1.021000000 $272.70 $114.96
2006-07 3.20% 1.032000000 $281.43 $114.96
2007-08 3.30% 1.033000000 $290.72 $114.96
2008-09 2.90% 1.029000000 $299.15 $114.96
2009-10 0.80% 1.008000000 $301.54 $25.00
2010-11 1.70% 1.017000000 $306.67 $25.00
2011-12 2.80% 1.028000000 $315.25 $25.00
2012-13 2.10% 1.021000000 $321.87 $0.00
2013-14 2.40% 1.024000000 $329.60 $0.00
2014-15 2.80% 1.028000000 $338.83 $0.00
2015-16 2.40% 1.024000000 $346.96 $0.00
2016-17 2.70% 1.027000000 $356.33 $0.00
2017-18 3.80% 1.038000000 $369.87 $0.00
2018-19 3.20% 1.032000000 $381.70 $0.00
2019-20 4.00% 1.040000000 $396.97 $213.60
2020-21 1.11% 1.011102405 $401.38 $401.38
2021-22 3.80% 1.038000000 $416.63 $416.62
2022-23 4.99% 1.049961379 $437.44 $437.44
2023-24 4.19% 1.041917274 $455.78 $455.78
2024-25 3.76% 1.037669574 $472.95 $472.94
Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

12 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on available parcel maps and other property data from the Monterey County Assessor’s office as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and adopted by the City Council.

A listing of parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2024-25, along with the corresponding assessment amounts, is included on the following page. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.

Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; common areas; landlocked parcels; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots and any other property that cannot be developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore, exempted from assessment.

Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

13 APN
Parcel
Type Units
2024-25 Maximum
Assessment Rate
2024-25 Proposed
Assessment Rate
2024-25 Proposed
Assessment
026-072-001 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-002 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-003 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-004 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-005 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-006 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-007 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-008 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-009 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-010 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-011 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-012 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-013 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-014 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-015 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-016 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-017 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-018 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-019 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-020 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-021 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-022 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-023 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-024 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-025 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-026 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-027 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-028 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-029 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-030 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-031 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-032 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-033 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-034 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-035 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-036 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-037 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-038 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-039 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

14 APN
Parcel
Type Units
2024-25 Maximum
Assessment Rate
2024-25 Proposed
Assessment Rate
2024-25 Proposed
Assessment
026-072-040 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-041 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-042 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-043 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-044 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-045 SFR 1.00 $472.95 $472.94 $472.94
026-072-046 EXE 0.00 $472.95 $472.94 $0.00
026-072-047 EXE 0.00 $472.95 $472.94 $0.00
026-072-048 EXE 0.00 $472.95 $472.94 $0.00
TOTALS: 45.00 $21,282.30
SFR = Single Family Residence
EXE = Landscape easement
Engineer’s Report
Riverview Gardens Landscape Maintenance District
City of King
Fiscal Year 2024-25

15 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Item No. 11 (A)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 25, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER

MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF ADJUSTMENTS TO THE FY 2024-25
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) approve the recommended adjustments to the FY 2024-25 Budget; and 2) adopt a Resolution establishing the appropriation limit from tax proceeds for FY 2024-25.

BACKGROUND:

The City utilizes a two-year budget process. The existing FY 2023-24/ FY 2024- 25 Biennial Budget was adopted in June 2023. Prior to the second year of the budget, staff reviews revenues and expenditures and recommends adjustments for the upcoming year, which are being presented for consideration at this meeting. The Budget Advisory Committee voted at their meeting on June 17, 2024 to recommend the adjustments be approved by the City Council.

DISCUSSION:

Attached is a list of the amendments being proposed. Most of the changes involve the General Fund. There are minimal adjustments in the other funds.

FY 2024-25 originally had a projected General Fund surplus of $55,874, which is now projected to be a deficit of $570,850 due to a negative reduction of revenues above expenditures in the amount of $626,724. However, of this amount, $450,000 is attributed to carryovers. This means expenditures for projects and programs budgeted in FY 2023-24 and not yet completed. Therefore, the revenues for those expenditures will show up in the fund balance.

EXHIBIT [A]
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025

APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution specifies that “Appropriations made by State and Local Governments may increase annually by a Factor comprised of the Change in Population combined either with the Change in California Per Capital Personal Income or the Local Assessment Roll due to Local Nonresidential Construction.” Per Capita Change 3.62% Converted to a
Factor 1.0362
Population Change 1.78% Converted to a
Factor

1.0178
Ratio of Change 1.0362 (x) 1.0178 (=) 1.0546
2023-2024 Appropriations Limit: $24,167,953
Factor 1.0546
2024-2025 Appropriations Limit: $25,487,523
The Amount subject to the Appropriations Limit is calculated as follows:
2024-2025 PROPOSED BUDGET
(1) Property Taxes $1,503,450
(2) Sales and Use Tax $4,377,555
(3) Utility Users Tax $260,000
(4) Business License Tax $103,000
(5) Transient Occupancy Tax $550,000
(6) Other Taxes:
- Real Estate Transfer Tax
- Homeowner’s Property Tax
Relief (HOPTR)
$34,000
(7) Interest (Prorated) $3,000
(8) Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax $1,289,560
(9) Cultivation Tax $325,000
Total Amount subject to Limitations $8,445,565
EXHIBIT [B]

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
April 30, 2024
Dear Fiscal Officer:

Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments.

Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2024, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2024-25. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the factors to calculate the 2024-25 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.

Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.

Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2024. Please note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal income change is based on historical data.

If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.
/s Richard Gillihan

RICHARD GILLIHAN
Chief Operating Officer
Attachment
May 2024
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2024-25 appropriation limit is:

Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2024-25 3.62
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2024-25 appropriation limit.
2024-25:

Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 3.62 percent
Population Change = 0.17 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 3.62 + 100 = 1.0362 100
Population converted to a ratio: 0.17 + 100 = 1.0017
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2024-25: 1.0362 x 1.0017 = 1.0379

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Population Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Alameda
Alameda 1.21 76,309 77,234 78,071
Albany -0.14 20,354 20,325 20,325
Berkeley 0.12 125,181 125,327 125,327
Dublin -0.03 71,600 71,575 72,917
Emeryville 4.95 12,686 13,314 13,314
Fremont -0.63 230,713 229,250 229,250
Hayward -0.58 160,699 159,770 159,770
Livermore -0.48 85,235 84,828 84,828
Newark -2.36 47,762 46,635 46,635
Oakland -0.52 427,085 424,873 425,093
Piedmont -0.88 10,878 10,782 10,782
Pleasanton -1.17 76,861 75,960 75,960
San Leandro -1.01 87,984 87,098 87,098
Union City -1.26 67,279 66,432 66,432
Unincorporated -1.18 147,743 146,006 146,067
County Total -0.54 1,648,369 1,639,409 1,641,869
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

1.42 -0.13
-0.77

2.85 0.71

3.74 1.81

1.04 0.55

0.67 -0.10

1.09 0.27
-0.11
-0.10

0.06 124,361
13,291
8,480
7,163
542,600
6,119
16,950
12,908
12,462
9,453
14,382
25,376
26,286
3,620
24,395
157,158
126,133
13,274
8,415
7,367
546,467
6,348
17,256
13,042
12,531
9,516
14,368
25,653
26,357
3,616
24,371
157,254
126,133
17,107
8,415
7,367
546,971
6,348
17,256
13,042
12,531
9,516
14,368
25,653
26,357
3,616
24,371
158,380
County Total 0.69 1,005,004 1,011,968 1,017,431
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 County
City
Percent Change
23-24
--- Population Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-23 1-1-24
Total
Population
1-1-24
Humboldt
Arcata
Blue Lake
Eureka
Ferndale
Fortuna
Rio Dell
Trinidad
Unincorporated
-1.54
-1.29
-0.80
-1.45
-1.11
-1.49
-1.34
-1.07
18,830
1,164
26,116
1,376
12,318
3,290
298
70,959
18,540
1,149
25,906
1,356
12,181
3,241
294
70,199
18,540
1,149
26,073
1,356
12,181
3,241
294
70,266
County Total -1.11 134,351 132,866 133,100
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

2.58 1.70

4.60 1.37

1.27 2.59

2.86 1.65
27,633
38,606
6,063
44,305
5,513
21,583
1,993
30,586
28,345
39,262
6,342
44,911
5,583
22,141
2,050
31,091
28,345
39,262
6,342
44,952
5,583
22,141
2,050
34,206
County Total 1.95 176,282 179,725 182,881
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.98 0.80

0.60 0.96

0.00 1.45

0.75 4.31

0.13 0.48

1.35 0.39
19,460
407,835
13,001
45,119
1,004
13,765
27,098
21,266
6,944
9,297
22,945
300,172
19,651
411,109
13,079
45,554
1,004
13,965
27,300
22,183
6,953
9,342
23,254
301,340
19,651
411,109
13,079
52,484
1,004
13,965
27,940
22,226
6,953
11,092
27,028
303,769
County Total 0.77 887,906 894,734 910,300
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills -0.44 19,928 19,841 19,841
Alhambra 0.05 81,753 81,790 81,811
Arcadia -0.13 55,855 55,783 55,783
Artesia -0.21 16,053 16,019 16,019
Avalon -0.57 3,332 3,313 3,313
Azusa -0.35 49,595 49,420 49,420
Baldwin Park -0.06 70,700 70,660 70,660
Bell -0.34 33,414 33,301 33,301
Bellflower -0.03 77,014 76,990 76,990
Bell Gardens -0.49 38,569 38,381 38,381
Beverly Hills -0.45 31,950 31,806 31,806
Bradbury -0.77 905 898 898
Burbank 0.11 105,484 105,603 105,603
Calabasas -0.50 22,857 22,742 22,742
Carson -0.52 92,399 91,920 91,924
Cerritos -0.53 48,063 47,806 47,806
Claremont 0.03 37,673 37,686 37,686
Commerce 0.57 12,055 12,124 12,124
Compton -0.37 94,016 93,671 93,671
Covina 0.19 50,390 50,485 50,485
Cudahy -0.52 22,327 22,210 22,210
Culver City 0.89 39,859 40,213 40,213
Diamond Bar -0.43 53,566 53,335 53,335
Downey -0.15 111,656 111,493 111,493
Duarte 3.04 22,958 23,656 23,656
El Monte 0.08 106,649 106,738 106,786
El Segundo -0.08 16,953 16,939 16,964
Gardena 0.22 59,896 60,028 60,028
Glendale -0.25 192,072 191,586 191,586
Glendora -0.32 51,374 51,209 51,209
Hawaiian Gardens -0.29 13,600 13,560 13,560
Hawthorne -0.37 85,886 85,566 85,566
Hermosa Beach -0.42 19,169 19,088 19,088
Hidden Hills 0.17 1,724 1,727 1,727
Huntington Park -0.31 53,374 53,209 53,219
Industry -0.23 427 426 426
Inglewood -0.53 106,628 106,065 106,065
Irwindale 0.74 1,488 1,499 1,499
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
La Canada Flintridge -0.20 20,089 20,048 20,048
La Habra Heights -0.45 5,513 5,488 5,488
Lakewood -0.25 80,365 80,162 80,162
La Mirada -0.40 48,271 48,077 48,077
Lancaster -0.10 169,939 169,776 172,631
La Puente -0.19 37,530 37,459 37,459
La Verne 0.06 31,678 31,697 31,697
Lawndale -0.55 31,026 30,855 30,855
Lomita -0.38 20,397 20,320 20,320
Long Beach -0.18 459,315 458,498 458,813
Los Angeles 0.27 3,800,438 3,810,548 3,814,318
Lynwood -0.23 66,424 66,271 66,271
Malibu -0.18 10,640 10,621 10,621
Manhattan Beach -0.50 34,367 34,195 34,195
Maywood -0.49 24,572 24,451 24,451
Monrovia 1.39 37,563 38,087 38,087
Montebello 0.32 61,730 61,930 61,930
Monterey Park -0.42 59,592 59,340 59,347
Norwalk -0.39 100,732 100,341 101,172
Palmdale -0.02 166,089 166,055 166,055
Palos Verdes Estates -0.44 13,031 12,974 12,974
Paramount -0.34 52,331 52,153 52,153
Pasadena 1.09 138,187 139,692 139,692
Pico Rivera -0.32 61,014 60,820 60,820
Pomona 0.68 151,132 152,166 152,166
Rancho Palos Verdes -0.50 41,106 40,902 40,919
Redondo Beach -0.27 68,424 68,239 68,239
Rolling Hills -0.53 1,686 1,677 1,677
Rolling Hills Estates 0.46 8,495 8,534 8,534
Rosemead 0.08 50,503 50,541 50,541
San Dimas -0.31 34,027 33,920 33,920
San Fernando 0.04 23,633 23,643 23,643
San Gabriel -0.09 38,648 38,613 38,613
San Marino 0.23 12,350 12,379 12,379
Santa Clarita -0.27 231,045 230,428 230,428
Santa Fe Springs -0.34 18,574 18,511 18,640
Santa Monica 0.34 92,598 92,912 92,912
Sierra Madre -0.15 10,925 10,909 10,909
Signal Hill -0.35 11,488 11,448 11,448
South El Monte -0.21 19,482 19,441 19,441
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.03 -0.37
-0.18
-0.36
-0.49
92,701
26,367
36,040
143,433
206
92,729
26,270
35,975
142,910
205
92,729
26,270
35,975
142,910
205
Walnut
West Covina
West Hollywood
Westlake Village
Whittier
Unincorporated
-0.10

0.65 -0.44
-0.45

0.22 -0.19
27,896
108,404
35,229
7,938
87,333
998,818
27,867
109,105
35,075
7,902
87,527
996,956
27,867
109,105
35,075
7,902
87,527
997,587
County Total 0.05 9,810,925 9,815,428 9,824,091
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.13 -0.44
-1.08
-0.26
-0.14
-0.45
-0.55
-0.36
-0.45
2,046
9,916
7,399
12,638
13,695
51,415
2,278
12,443
59,855
6,894
8,841
62,940
2,043
9,872
7,371
12,655
13,635
50,861
2,272
12,426
59,585
6,856
8,809
62,656
2,043
9,882
7,371
12,655
13,635
51,140
2,272
12,426
59,585
6,856
8,809
66,170
County Total -0.53 250,360 249,041 252,844
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Population Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Merced
Atwater 0.02 31,390 31,397 31,397
Dos Palos -0.02 5,634 5,633 5,633
Gustine -0.07 5,940 5,936 5,936
Livingston 0.09 14,273 14,286 14,286
Los Banos 0.25 47,300 47,419 47,419
Merced 1.91 90,120 91,837 91,837
Unincorporated 0.23 89,424 89,630 90,795
County Total 0.72 284,081 286,138 287,303
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.55 0.64

0.98 2.01

1.78 1.91

0.56 0.63

0.73 0.26

0.04 2.94

0.75 3,105
1,559
8,384
20,155
13,968
22,269
24,096
14,872
160,870
378
28,075
19,565
104,372
3,122
1,569
8,466
20,561
14,216
22,695
24,232
14,966
162,037
379
28,085
20,140
105,157
3,122
1,569
8,466
20,561
14,216
22,695
27,106
14,966
162,037
379
30,197
26,966
105,334
County Total 0.94 421,668 425,625 437,614
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Orange
Aliso Viejo -0.43 50,284 50,068 50,068
Anaheim 0.29 339,105 340,090 340,160
Brea -0.34 47,886 47,725 47,725
Buena Park 0.07 82,632 82,689 82,689
Costa Mesa -0.31 109,765 109,423 109,423
Cypress 0.11 49,291 49,345 49,345
Dana Point -0.38 32,721 32,596 32,596
Fountain Valley 0.18 56,233 56,333 56,333
Fullerton -0.32 140,756 140,311 140,311
Garden Grove 1.17 169,024 171,002 171,024
Huntington Beach -0.30 193,078 192,503 192,503
Irvine 0.97 311,537 314,550 314,550
Laguna Beach 0.07 22,433 22,449 22,449
Laguna Hills -0.42 30,442 30,315 30,315
Laguna Niguel 0.67 63,865 64,291 64,291
Laguna Woods -0.43 17,222 17,148 17,148
La Habra -0.21 61,028 60,901 60,901
Lake Forest 0.70 86,311 86,917 86,917
La Palma -0.40 15,131 15,071 15,071
Los Alamitos -0.19 11,970 11,947 11,947
Mission Viejo 0.09 91,221 91,304 91,304
Newport Beach -0.35 82,707 82,419 82,419
Orange -0.16 138,842 138,621 138,621
Placentia 0.08 52,182 52,226 52,226
Rancho Santa Margarita -0.43 46,507 46,305 46,305
San Clemente -0.29 62,481 62,297 62,297
San Juan Capistrano 1.05 34,627 34,992 34,992
Santa Ana 0.89 308,041 310,797 310,797
Seal Beach -0.37 24,200 24,110 24,350
Stanton 3.55 38,914 40,297 40,297
Tustin 0.42 78,515 78,844 78,844
Villa Park -0.19 5,716 5,705 5,705
Westminster 0.10 89,400 89,490 89,490
Yorba Linda -0.27 66,268 66,087 66,087
Unincorporated 0.72 130,381 131,325 131,335
County Total 0.31 3,140,716 3,150,493 3,150,835
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Population Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Placer
Auburn -0.94 13,344 13,218 13,218
Colfax -1.09 2,010 1,988 1,988
Lincoln 1.79 52,296 53,231 53,231
Loomis 0.06 6,597 6,601 6,601
Rocklin 0.26 71,420 71,609 71,609
Roseville 1.05 152,726 154,329 154,329
Unincorporated 0.16 111,692 111,868 111,868
County Total 0.67 410,085 412,844 412,844
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Riverside
Banning 0.54 31,046 31,213 31,213
Beaumont 2.03 56,275 57,416 57,416
Blythe -0.33 12,566 12,524 17,378
Calimesa -0.39 10,909 10,867 10,867
Canyon Lake -0.13 10,846 10,832 10,832
Cathedral City -0.27 51,012 50,873 50,911
Coachella 2.36 42,179 43,173 43,173
Corona 0.22 156,268 156,615 156,615
Desert Hot Springs 0.85 32,380 32,654 32,654
Eastvale -0.35 69,123 68,884 68,884
Hemet 0.37 89,333 89,663 89,663
Indian Wells 1.35 4,733 4,797 4,797
Indio 0.78 89,978 90,680 90,680
Jurupa Valley 0.12 104,541 104,663 104,721
Lake Elsinore 0.14 71,351 71,452 71,452
La Quinta 1.44 37,824 38,370 38,370
Menifee 1.97 109,401 111,560 111,560
Moreno Valley 0.12 206,903 207,146 207,146
Murrieta -0.17 109,364 109,177 109,177
Norco -0.15 22,084 22,050 25,068
Palm Desert 1.22 50,274 50,889 50,889
Palm Springs -0.03 43,802 43,791 43,791
Perris 1.13 78,424 79,311 79,311
Rancho Mirage 0.74 16,868 16,992 16,992
Riverside 0.30 315,747 316,690 316,690
San Jacinto -0.39 53,746 53,538 53,538
Temecula 0.49 108,173 108,700 108,700
Wildomar 0.65 36,093 36,327 36,327
Unincorporated 0.95 399,653 403,438 403,563
County Total 0.55 2,420,896 2,434,285 2,442,378
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Population Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
Sacramento
Citrus Heights -0.58 86,056 85,554 85,554
Elk Grove 0.69 177,446 178,679 178,679
Folsom 2.41 81,478 83,443 88,023
Galt 0.69 25,608 25,785 25,785
Isleton -0.65 772 767 767
Rancho Cordova 0.62 81,604 82,109 82,109
Sacramento 0.18 519,466 520,407 520,407
Unincorporated -0.40 599,989 597,614 597,614
County Total 0.12 1,572,419 1,574,358 1,578,938
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24 1-1-24
San Bernardino
Adelanto -0.80 36,422 36,131 36,131
Apple Valley -0.24 74,500 74,322 74,322
Barstow -0.34 24,124 24,043 24,669
Big Bear Lake 0.20 4,948 4,958 4,958
Chino 0.57 88,580 89,088 92,585
Chino Hills -0.17 76,547 76,414 76,414
Colton -0.12 52,841 52,778 52,778
Fontana 0.68 212,772 214,223 214,223
Grand Terrace -0.17 12,793 12,771 12,771
Hesperia 0.75 99,338 100,087 100,087
Highland 0.12 55,612 55,676 55,676
Loma Linda -0.02 24,923 24,919 24,965
Montclair -0.09 37,246 37,211 37,211
Needles -0.23 4,780 4,769 4,769
Ontario 0.93 179,555 181,224 181,224
Rancho Cucamonga 0.56 172,344 173,316 173,316
Redlands 1.28 71,776 72,696 72,696
Rialto 0.71 102,367 103,097 103,097
San Bernardino 0.39 224,316 225,188 226,541
Twentynine Palms -1.12 15,397 15,224 25,346
Upland 0.56 77,849 78,285 78,285
Victorville 0.96 132,537 133,805 138,202
Yucaipa 0.33 53,635 53,810 53,810
Yucca Valley 0.40 21,509 21,594 21,594
Unincorporated 0.02 286,864 286,926 295,763
County Total 0.42 2,143,575 2,152,555 2,181,433
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.07 5.39

0.50 2.67

0.10 0.48

1.33 0.29
7,244
35,138
66,164
88,552
15,726
315,655
95,341
157,407
7,249
37,033
66,492
90,917
15,741
317,174
96,609
157,866
7,249
37,033
66,492
90,917
15,741
317,204
96,609
160,163
County Total 1.01 781,227 789,081 791,408
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.37 -0.49
-0.52
-0.29

0.90 -0.42
18,039
29,278
30,792
12,542
10,315
7,869
48,249
118,457
17,941
29,233
30,907
12,481
10,261
7,846
48,684
117,954
17,941
30,279
30,907
12,481
10,261
7,846
48,684
120,070
County Total -0.08 275,541 275,307 278,469
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.04 0.08

0.04 1.10
-0.06

0.35 0.84

0.05 -0.07
4,968
12,734
32,503
8,582
40,571
85,362
109,687
5,660
136,235
4,970
12,744
32,515
8,676
40,545
85,659
110,608
5,663
136,144
4,970
12,744
32,515
8,676
43,610
85,679
110,608
5,663
139,158
County Total 0.28 436,302 437,524 443,623
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.80 -0.19
-0.01
-0.41

0.17 0.51

0.11 2.45
-0.21
-0.13
-0.26
-0.08

0.24 -0.53
43,191
59,656
60,419
31,316
8,477
33,368
81,635
3,564
46,333
84,463
68,093
970,772
132,386
30,845
157,187
90,063
43,095
59,471
60,904
31,255
8,476
33,230
81,773
3,582
46,384
86,535
67,953
969,491
132,048
30,819
157,566
89,584
43,095
59,471
61,033
31,255
8,476
33,230
81,773
3,582
46,384
86,535
67,973
969,491
132,048
30,819
157,566
90,467
County Total 0.02 1,901,768 1,902,166 1,903,198
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.67 -0.19
-0.18
838
1,658
667
676
1,202
3,211
872
2,692
7,820
23,794
836
1,651
665
674
1,199
3,203
870
2,710
7,805
23,750
836
1,651
665
674
1,199
3,203
870
2,710
7,805
23,796
County Total -0.15 43,430 43,363 43,409
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

1.80 0.32

0.35 1.04

0.10 -0.54
-0.52
26,255
19,060
115,266
9,969
28,543
96,096
122,220
17,392
26,033
19,403
115,632
10,004
28,840
96,192
121,558
17,301
26,033
19,403
120,339
10,004
28,840
102,173
121,558
18,076
County Total 0.04 434,801 434,963 446,426
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024 and Total Population, January 1, 2024 County
City
Percent Change
23-24
--- Population Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-23 1-1-24
Total
Population
1-1-24
Sonoma
Cloverdale
Cotati
Healdsburg
Petaluma
Rohnert Park
Santa Rosa
Sebastopol
Sonoma
Windsor
Unincorporated
-1.11
-1.06
-0.32
-0.02
-0.04
-0.07
-0.96
-0.98
-0.91
-0.40
8,808
7,381
11,020
58,457
43,838
175,013
7,366
10,636
25,628
130,333
8,710
7,303
10,985
58,445
43,821
174,890
7,295
10,532
25,394
129,812
8,710
7,303
10,985
58,445
43,821
174,890
7,295
10,532
25,394
130,777
County Total -0.27 478,480 477,187 478,152
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.58 2.28

0.52 0.15

0.29 1.49

1.59 0.55

0.08 0.16
49,035
7,539
216,734
12,103
22,942
24,426
24,614
70,885
9,103
108,372
49,319
7,711
217,862
12,121
23,008
24,790
25,006
71,273
9,110
108,544
49,319
7,711
217,862
12,121
23,008
24,790
25,006
71,273
9,110
108,544
County Total 0.55 545,753 548,744 548,744
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.45 0.08

1.78 1.07

0.70 1.77

1.10 0.17

0.42 25,458
10,171
10,146
12,461
62,320
69,565
142,821
7,700
133,652
25,573
10,179
10,327
12,594
62,758
70,799
144,385
7,713
134,219
25,573
10,179
10,327
12,594
62,934
70,799
144,532
7,713
134,267
County Total 0.90 474,294 478,547 478,918
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.57 -0.49
-0.05
-0.10
-0.69
-0.20
-0.14
-0.11
-0.38
-0.44
69,256
16,965
35,286
7,537
197,737
19,168
107,723
31,400
124,165
123,111
89,813
69,014
17,061
35,114
7,533
197,536
19,036
107,512
31,355
124,029
122,643
89,421
69,014
17,061
35,114
7,533
197,536
20,916
107,569
31,355
124,029
122,643
91,093
County Total -0.23 822,161 820,254 823,863
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment C
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024
County Percent Change
23-24
--- Population
1-1-23
Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-24
Alameda
Incorporated
County Total
-0.48
-0.54
1,500,626
1,648,369
1,493,403
1,639,409
Alpine
Incorporated
County Total

0.00 -0.34
0 1,183
0 1,179
Amador
Incorporated
County Total
-0.80
-0.89
13,813
36,091
13,703
35,770
Butte
Incorporated
County Total

1.61 -0.32
144,871
206,579
147,197
205,928
Calaveras
Incorporated
County Total
-0.47
-0.15
3,604
44,853
3,587
44,786
Colusa
Incorporated
County Total
-0.18
-0.40
11,997
21,831
11,975
21,743
Contra Costa
Incorporated
County Total

0.11 0.12
971,251
1,145,274
972,337
1,146,626
Del Norte
Incorporated
County Total

0.52 -0.08
4,019
24,787
4,040
24,768
El Dorado
Incorporated
County Total

0.32 0.26
31,220
187,974
31,320
188,463
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.81 0.69
847,846
1,005,004
854,714
1,011,968
Glenn
Incorporated
County Total

2.77 1.43
14,458
28,330
14,858
28,736
Humboldt
Incorporated
County Total
-1.14
-1.11
63,392
134,351
62,667
132,866
Imperial
Incorporated
County Total

2.02 1.95
145,696
176,282
148,634
179,725
Inyo
Incorporated
County Total
-0.13
-0.16
3,853
18,826
3,848
18,796
Kern
Incorporated
County Total

0.96 0.77
587,734
887,906
593,394
894,734
Kings
Incorporated
County Total

0.15 0.04
108,741
133,516
108,903
133,575
Lake
Incorporated
County Total

0.90 0.47
21,343
66,619
21,535
66,933
Lassen
Incorporated
County Total
-0.22
-0.08
9,355
24,305
9,334
24,286
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.07 0.05
8,812,107
9,810,925
8,818,472
9,815,428
Madera
Incorporated
County Total

0.28 0.79
79,869
152,734
80,096
153,934
Marin
Incorporated
County Total
-0.55
-0.53
187,420
250,360
186,385
249,041
Mariposa
Incorporated
County Total

0.00 -0.04
0 16,912
0 16,905
Mendocino
Incorporated
County Total

0.27 -0.08
28,485
89,496
28,562
89,424
Merced
Incorporated
County Total

0.95 0.72
194,657
284,081
196,508
286,138
Modoc
Incorporated
County Total
-0.19
-0.20
2,664
8,501
2,659
8,484
Mono
Incorporated
County Total
-2.67
-2.53
7,305
13,097
7,110
12,765
Monterey
Incorporated
County Total

1.00 0.94
317,296
421,668
320,468
425,625
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.47 0.38
111,044
132,816
111,570
133,324
Nevada
Incorporated
County Total
-0.01
-0.30
33,530
100,421
33,525
100,115
Orange
Incorporated
County Total

0.29 0.31
3,010,335
3,140,716
3,019,168
3,150,493
Placer
Incorporated
County Total

0.87 0.67
298,393
410,085
300,976
412,844
Plumas
Incorporated
County Total
-1.14
-0.80
2,099
18,993
2,075
18,841
Riverside
Incorporated
County Total

0.48 0.55
2,021,243
2,420,896
2,030,847
2,434,285
Sacramento
Incorporated
County Total

0.44 0.12
972,430
1,572,419
976,744
1,574,358
San Benito
Incorporated
County Total

0.73 1.06
44,579
65,165
44,904
65,853
San Bernardino
Incorporated
County Total

0.48 0.42
1,856,711
2,143,575
1,865,629
2,152,555
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

0.03 0.07
2,756,900
3,235,324
2,757,771
3,237,699
San Francisco
Incorporated
County Total

0.11 0.11
841,745
841,745
842,644
842,644
San Joaquin
Incorporated
County Total

1.19 1.01
623,820
781,227
631,215
789,081
San Luis Obispo
Incorporated
County Total

0.17 -0.08
157,084
275,541
157,353
275,307
San Mateo
Incorporated
County Total
-0.49
-0.50
683,226
745,168
679,897
741,435
Santa Barbara
Incorporated
County Total

0.44 0.28
300,067
436,302
301,380
437,524
Santa Clara
Incorporated
County Total

0.05 0.02
1,811,705
1,901,768
1,812,582
1,902,166
Santa Cruz
Incorporated
County Total
-0.04
-0.29
135,179
263,282
135,121
262,509
Shasta
Incorporated
County Total

0.18 0.05
113,195
178,923
113,397
179,019
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment C
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024
County Percent Change
23-24
--- Population
1-1-23
Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-24
Sierra
Incorporated
County Total
-0.41
-0.50
727
3,187
724
3,171
Siskiyou
Incorporated
County Total
-0.12
-0.15
19,636
43,430
19,613
43,363
Solano
Incorporated
County Total

0.06 0.04
417,409
434,801
417,662
434,963
Sonoma
Incorporated
County Total
-0.22
-0.27
348,147
478,480
347,375
477,187
Stanislaus
Incorporated
County Total

0.64 0.55
437,381
545,753
440,200
548,744
Sutter
Incorporated
County Total

1.90 1.90
78,432
98,248
79,924
100,110
Tehama
Incorporated
County Total
-0.50
-0.61
22,913
64,578
22,798
64,182
Trinity
Incorporated
County Total

0.00 -0.11
0 15,878
0 15,860
Tulare
Incorporated
County Total

1.08 0.90
340,642
474,294
344,328
478,547
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Attachment C
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- 23-24 1-1-23 1-1-24
Tuolumne
Incorporated 0.25 5,119 5,132
County Total -0.11 52,207 52,148
Ventura
Incorporated -0.21 732,348 730,833
County Total -0.23 822,161 820,254
Yolo
Incorporated 0.44 186,763 187,591
County Total 0.55 220,454 221,666
Yuba
Incorporated 0.93 16,492 16,645
County Total 1.25 80,672 81,679
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT 2

King City City CouncilJune 25, 2024

King City City Council
June 25, 2024