Agenda packet, regular meeting, first session — King City City Council, January 14, 2025

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CITY OF KING CITY COUNCIL
AND
Sitting as SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF

THE FORMER CDA FOR THE CITY OF KING
AND
Sitting as PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

FOR THE CITY OF KING
TUESDAY JANUARY 14, 2025
6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL
212 S. VANDERHURST AVENUE
KING CITY, CALIFORNIA 93930
The City Council meeting will be conducted in hybrid in-person/virtual format.

To join the meeting virtually, please use the link below to join the Zoom meeting:
https://bit.ly/3e0zvaR
Meeting ID: 881 5287 9536
Or by telephone: 1-669-900-9128
Passcode: 052933
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, Please contact the City Clerk's Office (831-386-5925) at least 48 hours prior to the Meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* Please submit all correspondence for City Council PRIOR to the meeting with a copy to the City Clerk.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Council Members Oscar Avalos, Robert Cullen, Carlos Victoria, Mayor Pro Tem Carlos DeLeon, and Mayor Mike LeBarre

FLAG SALUTE

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT
Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes’ total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council that is not on the agenda. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda. Comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not to any individual Council Member.

Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member, staff member or member of the audience is not permitted

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes’ total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council that is not on the agenda. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda. Comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not to any individual Council Member.

Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member, staff member or member of the audience is not permitted.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS & COMMITTEE REPORTS
Individual Council Members may comment on Council business, his or her Council activities, City operations, projects or other items of community interest. Council Members may also request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting on any matter or take action to direct staff to prepare a staff report for a future agenda.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Comments presented by the City Manager, City Attorney or other staff on City business and/or announcements.

CONSENT AGENDA
The following items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Members of the audience may speak on any item(s) listed on the Consent Agenda. Any Council Member, the City Manager, or the City Attorney may request that an item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to allow for full discussion. The Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion. Items withdrawn from the Consent Agenda may be considered by separate motions at the conclusion of the discussion of each item.

Consideration: Meeting Minutes Of December 10, 2024
Recommendation: approve and file.
9(A) 12-10-2024 MINUTES.PDF
Consideration: City Of King Check Register December 1, Through December 31, 2024 Recommendation: receive and file.
9(B) CITY OF KING CHECK REGISTER.PDF
Consideration: Amendment To The Master Fee Schedule
Recommendation: adopt a Resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule to apply an inflationary adjustment and overall update.
9(C) MASTER FEE SCHEDULE.PDF
Consideration: City Of King KCCP Payments For The Month Of December 2024 Recommendation: receive and file.
9(D) CC CITY AP KCCP 011425.PDF

7. 8.

9. A.

Documents:

10. A.
9(D) CC CITY AP KCCP 011425.PDF

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Consideration: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.34 Of The King City Municipal Code Pertaining To Fireworks And A Resolution Establishing The 2025 Fireworks Permit Process
Recommendation: 1) introduce to be read by title only an Ordinance amending provisions of Chapter 7.34 of Title 7 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to fireworks, open the hearing, allow for public testimony, close the hearing, waive first reading of the Ordinance, and approve the introduction of the Ordinance; and 2) adopt a Resolution setting forth the number of permits to sell fireworks and the method of selection of permit holders.
10(A) FIREWORKS REPORT.PDF
Consideration: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 20.04 Of The King City Municipal Code Pertaining To Administrative Citations
Recommendation: introduce to be read by title only an Ordinance amending provisions of Chapter 20.04 of Title 20 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to administrative citations, open the hearing, allow for public testimony, close the hearing, waive first reading of the Ordinance, and approve the introduction of the Ordinance. 10(B) ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS ORDINANCE REPORT.PDF

REGULAR BUSINESS
Consideration: Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Recommendation: approve adjustments to the FY 2024-25 Budget. 11(A) BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS.PDF
Consideration: The San Antonio Drive/Broadway Street Bike Path And Safe Routes To Schools Improvement Project
Recommendation: 1) receive a presentation and update on the San Antonio Drive / Broadway Street Bike Path & Safe Routes to Schools Improvements Project; 2) adopt the initial study/negative declaration (IS/ND); and 3) approve the Project prior to submittal to CTC for PS&E Phase funding allocation.
11(B) SAN ANTONIO BIKE PATH PROJECT.PDF

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
Announcement(s) of any reportable action(s) taken in Closed Session will be made in open session and repeated at the beginning of the next Regular City Council meeting as this portion of the meeting is not recorded.

Liability Claims, By Andrea Martinez, Claim Against City Of King, Gov. Code Section:
54956.95
Liability Claims, By Jonathan Rodriguez, Claim Against City Of King, Gov. Code Section: 54956.95
Conference With Legal Counsel - Regarding Pending Litigation Pursuant To Government

10. A.

Documents:

11. A.

Documents:

12. A.

C
Liability Claims, By Andrea Martinez, Claim Against City Of King, Gov. Code Section:
54956.95
Liability Claims, By Jonathan Rodriguez, Claim Against City Of King, Gov. Code Section: 54956.95
Conference With Legal Counsel - Regarding Pending Litigation Pursuant To Government Code Section 54956.9. Cases: 1
Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure To Litigation Pursuant To Government Code Section 54956.9(D): One (1) Matter.

ADJOURNMENT
The City of King is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

13.

Page 1 of 5 ends

City Council Meeting
December 10, 2024

1.__CALL TO ORDER:

Regular Meeting called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor LeBarre.

2.__ROLL CALL:

City Council: Mike LeBarre, Carlos Victoria, Carlos DeLeon, Rob Cullen and Oscar Avalos.

City Staff: City Manager Steve Adams; City Attorney Roy Santos; City Clerk, Erica Sonne.

3.__FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Rose Cullen.

4. CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

None

5.__PRESENTATIONS:

None

6. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS:

Pastor Ken Reese spoke on shootings that have been happening and taking a different approach. While he appreciates everything the Police Department is doing he feels calling on children to have events of peace such as possibly March 23rd a day of peace. A poetry contest, Art contest, Music event with the theme of Peace possibly through the local schools or Soul Treasures.

7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Avalos stated he attended a celebration at First Tee where they gifted 65 iPads to students in King City and Salinas.

Council Member Cullen stated he supports Pastor Ken’s endeavor.

Council Member DeLeon, Mayor Pro Tem Victoria and Mayor LeBarre had nothing to report tonight.

8. CITY STAFF REPORTS AND COMMENTS:

City Manager Steve Adams stated San Antonio Drive Path and Safe Routes to School Project workshop is tomorrow night at 6p.m. He also stated that the Holiday Party is Thursday night at 5:30p.m. and all of Council is invited.

City Attorney Roy Santos had nothing to report.

9. ELECTIONS
A. Consideration: Resolution No. 2024-5019 Canvassing and Declaring the Result of the November 5, 2024, Election
9(A)

Page 2 of 5 ends

Action: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2024-5019, Canvassing and Declaring the Result of the Consolidated General Election held in the City of King on November 5, 2024, by Victoria seconded by Cullen.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, Acosta, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

B. Oath of Office Administered by the City Clerk to Carlos DeLeon, Carlos Victoria and Robert Cullen
City Clerk Erica Sonne swore in Council member Carlos DeLeon, Carlos Victoria and Robert Cullen.

C. Comments by Newly Elected Council Members
Council member Cullen stated he has been on Council for 16 years. He feels King City is a special place. He thanked his in-laws and stated he couldn’t do anything without Allie and Rose.

Council member Victoria stated many years ago he was asked to run for City Council, and he had a different attitude towards the city. He thanked Rob for talking to him about being on council all those years ago.

Council member DeLeon thanked the district 3 voters. He said being on council is humbling. He thanked his wife. He wants the best for King City.

D. Consideration: Selection of Council Officers
City Clerk opened nominations for Mayor.

Nomination of Mike LeBarre by Robert Cullen for Mayor.

Mike LeBarre accepted the nomination.

Action: Motion to appoint Michael LeBarre Mayor of City Council for 2 years by Council member Cullen and seconded by Council Member Victoria.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, Avalos, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

Nomination of Carlos DeLeon for Mayor Pro Tem by Council member Victoria.

Carlos DeLeon accepted the nomination.

Action: Motion to appoint Carlos DeLeon Mayor Pro Tem for 2 years by Council member Victoria and seconded by Mayor LeBarre.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, Avalos, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

Page 3 of 5 ends

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

E. Consideration: Regional Board and Committee Assignments Recommendation: Select Council representatives and alternates to the following regional Boards and Committees:

1.Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC)- LeBarre, alt. DeLeon

2.Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG)- Avalos alt. DeLeon

3.Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority – Cullen alt. Avalos

4.Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District

5.Monterey Salinas Transit (MST) LeBarre alt. Victoria

6.Oversight Board for the Successor Agency -

7.King City Schools – Liaison – Carlos Victoria

8.Salinas Valley Fair – Liaison – Oscar Avalos
Action: Motion to board and committee assignments by Victoria and seconded by Avalos.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, Avalos, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

10. CONSENT AGENDA:

A. Consideration: Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2024, Council Meeting B. Consideration: City of King Check Register November 16, through November 30, 2024 C. Consideration: 2025 Commercial Cannabis Business Tax Rates D. Consideration: Reallocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Revenues E. Consideration: New Lease Agreement for City Owned House at 424 Pearl Street F. Consideration: The Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) 2025-2030 For Mesa Del Rey Airport
G. Consideration: City of King KCCP Payments for the Month of November 2024 H. Consideration: FY2024-25 Job Classification Plan
Council member Cullen pulled Item D.

Action: Motion to approve consent agenda items A—C and E-H by Avalos seconded by Victoria.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, Avalos, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

Council Member Cullen left the meeting due to a conflict with Item D.

Action: Motion to approve consent agenda item D by Victoria seconded by DeLeon.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Victoria, Avalos, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members: Cullen,
ABSTAIN: Council Members:

Page 4 of 5 ends

Council Member Cullen returned to the meeting.

11. PUBLIC HEARING:

None

12. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. Consideration: Recommended Mobile Food Vendor Regulations Modifications City Manager Adams introduced this item.

Francisco Chavez owner of La Potranca de Jalisco at 201 Broadway stated he has to follow state regulations, he has a lease to pay, insurance, sales tax. He doesn’t want to have to let staff go. He feels that letting more food trucks in will bring his business down.

Tina Lopez, owner of La Cucina, 815 Broadway Street, is ok with food truck vendors obtaining up to two temporary use permits for their food trucks to operate on an additional 4 days per week on days when La Cocina is not operating.

Jose Jaime, Smoke Signals BBQ, explained that he works hard to get the food truck prepped for service.

He pays insurance, and sales tax. He explained it is hard to get a brick and mortar started. He provides what other businesses do not with his smoked meats, different pizzas, sandwiches etc.

Action: Motion to approve staff recommendations for changes to mobile food vendor regulations and direct staff to present corresponding Municipal Code amendments for consideration by DeLeon seconded by Avalos.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, Avalos, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

B. Consideration: Budget Goals
City Manager Adams introduced this item.

Action: Motion to approve 1) amended mid-year budget goals for FY 2024-25; 2) proposed preliminary budget goals for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27; and 2) the recommended budget process and date for the budget workshop by Avalos seconded by Victoria.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, Avalos, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

13. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
None

Page 5 of 5 ends

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor LeBarre adjourned the meeting at 7:24p.m.

Approved Signatures:

Mayor, Michael LeBarre City Clerk, Erica Sonne
City of King City of King
Item No. 9(B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF KING CHECK REGISTER
DECEMBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council receive and file.

BACKGROUND:

At least once a month, the City Treasurer shall submit to the City Council, a copy of the invoices paid for the previous month.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this item is to provide the Council an opportunity to review and monitor ongoing expenditures. These documents are attached.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

No Environmental Review required for this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Receive and file the report; or

2. Provide other direction to staff regarding requests for additional information.

1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 1 of 13
Check Report
King City, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Bank Code: POOL-WFB-POOL - WELLS FARGO BANK
Payment Type: EFT
SEIU SEIU LOCAL 521 12/06/2024 EFT 0.00 476.25 10104
INV0000304 Invoice 12/06/2024 SEIU UNION DUES 0.00 476.25 ADAMS ADAMS ASHBY GROUP LLC 12/12/2024 EFT 0.00 526.25 10105 6301 Invoice 12/12/2024 CDBG Wastewater Treatment Plant Grant … 0.00 526.25 ALVAREZ ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 12/12/2024 EFT 0.00 6,528.00 10106 74472 Invoice 12/12/2024 Monthly IT Services January 2025 0.00 6,528.00 MAGICC NORMA L DOMINGUEZ 12/12/2024 EFT 0.00 13,400.00 10107 5019 Invoice 12/12/2024 Park & City Janitorial Service 0.00 7,320.00 6020 Invoice 12/12/2024 Monarch Inn Janitorial Service 0.00 6,080.00 TORO TORO PETROLEUM CORP 12/12/2024 EFT 0.00 33,544.92 10108 0680597-IN Invoice 12/12/2024 Wastewater Oil 0.00 227.72 33779 Invoice 12/12/2024 SE Tree Trimming 0.00 22,320.00 CL78849 Invoice 12/12/2024 Fuel 0.00 3,757.12
CL80333 Invoice 12/12/2024 Fuel 0.00 3,709.45
CL80636 Invoice 12/12/2024 Fuel 0.00 3,530.63
A & W ALESHIRE & WYNDER LLP 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 16,595.60 10109 91425 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services General 0.00 2,650.00 91426 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services Personnel 0.00 870.00 91427 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services Planning 0.00 1,697.00 91428 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services - Grocery Outlet Litigation 0.00 680.00 91429 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services - MCD Litigation 0.00 10,592.20 91430 Invoice 12/13/2024 Legal Services Shangri-La Industries Litigat… 0.00 106.40 ALVAREZ ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 136.95 10110 74560 Invoice 12/13/2024 IT Support 0.00 136.95
AM SUPPLY AMERICAN SUPPLY CO 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 2,093.04 10111 3039964 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 670.16 3040177 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 281.55 3043163 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitoral Supplies 0.00 128.49 3045050 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 32.08 3047152 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 804.26 3047464 Invoice 12/13/2024 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 176.50 CAROLLO CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 373.00 10116 FB58997 Invoice 12/13/2024 Professional Services Mangement Support 0.00 373.00 EIKHOF EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP INC 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 6,947.70 10117 2024241 Invoice 12/13/2024 Golf Course Restoration Project 0.00 6,947.70 GIS GONZALES IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INC 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 334.13 10118 KC126522 Invoice 12/13/2024 Supplies for Park 0.00 173.57 KC126523 Invoice 12/13/2024 Supplies for Park 0.00 160.56 SMITHE SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPING INC 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 3,210.00 10119 44767 Invoice 12/13/2024 Riverview Gardens Monthly Landscape Ma… 0.00 625.00 44768 Invoice 12/13/2024 Landscaping Maintenance 0.00 2,585.00 SPECTRUMT SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE Charter Communication 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 1,583.21 10120 113362301112124 Invoice 12/13/2024 Internet 0.00 1,583.21 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 2 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount SPCA THE SPCA FOR MONTEREY COUNTY 12/13/2024 EFT 0.00 3,430.00 10121 1024 Invoice 12/13/2024 SPCA - OCT 2024 0.00 3,430.00
SEIU SEIU LOCAL 521 12/20/2024 EFT 0.00 476.25 10122
INV0000342 Invoice 12/20/2024 SEIU UNION DUES 0.00 476.25 ADAMS ADAMS ASHBY GROUP LLC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 5,081.00 10123 6247 Invoice 12/20/2024 Labor Compliance Downtown Street Proje… 0.00 3,483.00 6270 Invoice 12/20/2024 Labor Compliance Downtown Street Proje… 0.00 1,088.00 6299 Invoice 12/20/2024 Labor Compliance Downtow Plaza Park Pro… 0.00 182.75 6300 Invoice 12/20/2024 Labor Compliance Downtown Street Proje… 0.00 327.25 ALVAREZ ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 47,651.92 10124 74607 Invoice 12/20/2024 IT Support - Scanners Issue 0.00 536.25 74608 Invoice 12/20/2024 IT Support 0.00 100.00
74646 Invoice 12/20/2024 Computer Replacement Program 0.00 46,258.32 74656 Invoice 12/20/2024 IT Support 0.00 481.80
74669 Invoice 12/20/2024 IT Support 0.00 275.55
CAROLLO CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 92,435.25 10125 FB59511 Invoice 12/20/2024 WWTP Upgrade Professional Services 0.00 92,435.25 MO BAY SYS MONTEREY BAY OFFICE PRODUCTS MONTEREY BAY SYSTEMS INC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 842.29 10126 481999 Invoice 12/20/2024 MBS B2C BW/CLR METE 0.00 842.29 ROSSI BROS ROSSI BROS TIRE & AUTO SERVICE 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 97.82 10127 84384 Invoice 12/20/2024 Oil Change 0.00 97.82
RRM DESIGN RRM DESIGN GROUP INC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 2,237.50 10128 0597041124 Invoice 12/20/2024 Downtown Plaza 0.00 2,237.50 SMITHE SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPING INC 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 625.00 10129 291 Invoice 12/20/2024 Landscape Main. DEC 2024 0.00 625.00 SPECTRUMT SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE Charter Communication 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 319.98 10130 170002601120724 Invoice 12/20/2024 Business Internet 0.00 319.98 TORO TORO PETROLEUM CORP 12/23/2024 EFT 0.00 6,045.38 10131 CL80769 Invoice 12/20/2024 Gas 0.00 1,623.34
CL81060 Invoice 12/20/2024 Gas 0.00 2,984.67
CL81308 Invoice 12/20/2024 Gas Miles 0.00 1,437.37
Total EFT: 0.00 244,991.44
Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 3 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Payment Type: Regular
KINGSMARKET KINGS MARKET LLC 12/02/2024 Regular 0.00 4,107.08 72093 112724 Invoice 12/02/2024 Toys for Operation Santa 0.00 4,107.08 AFLAC AFLAC 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 188.42 72094
INV0000288 Invoice 12/06/2024 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 85.58 INV0000289 Invoice 12/06/2024 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 102.84 ANTHEM BLU ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 3,365.05 72095 INV0000290 Invoice 12/06/2024 HEALTH INSURANCE DEDUCTION 0.00 3,365.05 CAL PERS R CAL PERS RETIREMENTSYSTEM 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 33,586.31 72096 INV0000296 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYER 0.00 4,037.37 INV0000297 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYEE 0.00 3,975.81 INV0000298 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYER 0.00 7,325.32 INV0000299 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYEE 0.00 7,320.01 INV0000300 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 1,589.91 INV0000301 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 919.58 INV0000302 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS SAFETY CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 5,832.94 INV0000303 Invoice 12/06/2024 PERS SAFTEY CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 2,585.37 CACHLDSUP CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 522.00 72097 INV0000305 Invoice 12/06/2024 M. DILLON CHILD SUPPORT 0.00 522.00 K.C.P.O.A. K.C.P.O.A. 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 825.00 72098 INV0000294 Invoice 12/06/2024 KCPOA UNION DUES 0.00 825.00 K.C.P.S.A. K.C.P.S.A. 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 340.00 72099 INV0000295 Invoice 12/06/2024 KCPSA UNION DUES 0.00 340.00 ICMA RETIR MISSION SQUARE-302397 12/06/2024 Regular 0.00 8,667.36 72100 INV0000285 Invoice 12/06/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 688.83 INV0000286 Invoice 12/06/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 639.27 INV0000287 Invoice 12/06/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 443.82 INV0000291 Invoice 12/06/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 4,624.87 INV0000292 Invoice 12/06/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 1,975.30 INV0000293 Invoice 12/06/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 295.27 MONASMITH CHARLES A MONASMITH 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 15,850.00 72101 2778 Invoice 12/09/2024 Community Center Fumigation 0.00 15,850.00 FLODUCA F LODUCA CO 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 373,148.64 72102 120224 Invoice 12/02/2024 KC Plaza - Progress Payment #6 0.00 373,148.64 MONARCH IN MELDI LLC 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 49,658.00 72103 112724 Invoice 12/09/2024 Monarch Inn Temp Homeless Shelter Lease 0.00 49,658.00 MO CO EMER MONTEREY COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 68,238.00 72104 120224 Invoice 12/09/2024 Quarter 3 Emergency Communication 0.00 68,238.00 MASTERSON ROBERT MASTERSON 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 298.95 72105 112024 Invoice 12/09/2024 Pizza - Pizza with the Police Event 0.00 298.95 HUNTING THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK MUNICIPAL FINANCE 12/09/2024 Regular 0.00 128,102.99 72106 112624 Invoice 12/09/2024 Solar Lease Payment 0.00 128,102.99 ALFREDO ALFREDO'S CONCRETE 1,INC 12/12/2024 Regular 0.00 102,805.00 72107 3042 Invoice 12/12/2024 Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 102,805.00 CARMEL FIR ART BLACK 12/12/2024 Regular 0.00 500.00 72108 124535 Invoice 12/12/2024 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 124536 Invoice 12/12/2024 Fire Sprinkler System - 154 Boston Lane 0.00 250.00 A & G PUMP A & G PUMPING INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,362.00 72109 2499111 Invoice 12/13/2024 Rental 0.00 112.00
Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 4 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2499288 Invoice 12/13/2024 sw Junction Box Cleaning 0.00 1,250.00 AT&T A T & T 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 282.92 72110
11202024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Phone Service 0.00 282.92
ACEHIGH ACE HIGH DESIGNS INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 2,367.14 72111 53113 Invoice 12/13/2024 Basketball Uniforms 0.00 2,169.88 53161 Invoice 12/13/2024 Basketball Uniforms 0.00 197.26 KCTVHARD ALCANTAR HARDWARE INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,230.71 72112 573797 Invoice 12/13/2024 Irrigation Repair State Park 0.00 43.48 573802 Invoice 12/13/2024 Staples For No Parking Signs 0.00 8.25 573884 Invoice 12/13/2024 Cut Wheel Splash Pad Repair 0.00 12.14 573891 Invoice 12/13/2024 9 Volt Batteries Timers 0.00 21.74 573894 Invoice 12/13/2024 Landscaping Supplies Tools 0.00 38.03 573933 Invoice 12/13/2024 Long Handle Shovel WWTP 0.00 58.70 573987 Invoice 12/13/2024 Graffiti Cover 0.00 9.34
573992 Invoice 12/13/2024 Graffiti Cover 0.00 9.34
574604 Invoice 12/13/2024 Paint Remover Wheel Graffiti on Side Walk 0.00 13.04 574712 Invoice 12/13/2024 2 cycle oil 0.00 54.35
574720 Invoice 12/13/2024 Equipment Repair 0.00 65.51
574726 Invoice 12/13/2024 Paint / Thinner 0.00 717.71
574754 Invoice 12/13/2024 Traps for yard 0.00 42.59
574798 Invoice 12/13/2024 New Tarp for Trailer 0.00 39.13 575067 Invoice 12/13/2024 Hedge Trimer Blade Luse 0.00 9.78 575068 Invoice 12/13/2024 New Gas Can 0.00 35.88
575107 Invoice 12/13/2024 Key to New Restroom 0.00 4.34 575182 Invoice 12/13/2024 Replacement Strap Black Trailer 0.00 6.50 575279 Invoice 12/13/2024 Cleaner for Rec Floor 0.00 4.34 575309 Invoice 12/13/2024 Paint for Rec Center Steps 0.00 36.52 TRUJILLOA ALICIA TRUJILLO 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 62.98 72113 12424 Invoice 12/13/2024 Basketball Uniforms 0.00 62.98 ALLTE ALL-TEMP REFRIGERATION HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 215.88 72114 29171 Invoice 12/13/2024 AC Repair 0.00 215.88
AMAZON AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 843.10 72115 116YPYR63LDM Invoice 12/13/2024 Softball Fund 0.00 123.94 11RMQQGF3QRD Invoice 12/13/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 346.86 179JG1643FKH Invoice 12/13/2024 Pool Repair Supplies 0.00 74.74 1G3YL764FY71 Invoice 12/13/2024 RecStirrers 0.00 14.58
1JDJ71VXC4TF Invoice 12/13/2024 Market Supplies 0.00 172.81 1V7DLLD9R64C Invoice 12/13/2024 Rec Center Supplies 0.00 14.39 1w7qggplqfyd Invoice 12/13/2024 Pool Repair Supplies 0.00 95.78 AT & T AT & T 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 149.80 72116
11222024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Internet 0.00 149.80
AT & T-FIR AT & T MOBILITY 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,145.41 72117 287299743011X… Invoice 12/13/2024 Cellphones 0.00 1,145.41 AT&T - C AT&T Calnet 3 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 184.86 72118 000022634233 Invoice 12/13/2024 Cell Phone Bill 0.00 154.21 000022634820 Invoice 12/13/2024 911 Line 0.00 30.65
BENITEZ SECURITY BENITEZ SECURITY SERVICES 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 12,240.00 72119 2480 Invoice 12/13/2024 Security for Monarch Inn Temporary home… 0.00 3,264.00 2492 Invoice 12/13/2024 Security for Monarch Inn Temporary Home… 0.00 2,688.00 2513 Invoice 12/13/2024 Security for the Monarch Inn temporary h… 0.00 3,600.00 2529 Invoice 12/13/2024 Security For Monarch Inn Temp Homeless … 0.00 2,688.00 CALSTATE CALSTATE SUPPLY, INC. 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 3,012.85 72120 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 5 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 102224 Invoice 12/13/2024 Sprinklers fo 0.00 400.90
9624 Invoice 12/13/2024 Parts n Sprinklers for WWTF 0.00 2,611.95 CAL-WESTL CAL-WEST LIGHTING AND SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 200.00 72121 240949 Invoice 12/13/2024 Monthly Maintenace Traffic Signals 0.00 100.00 241002 Invoice 12/13/2024 Monthly Maint Traffic Signals 0.00 100.00 SAME DAY S CHARLES C. SALMINA Same Day Shred 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 395.00 72122 60200 Invoice 12/13/2024 Shred Bins 0.00 100.00
60238 Invoice 12/13/2024 Purgin of Records 0.00 295.00
COASTAL COASTAL TRACTOR 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 113.60 72123 IK07697 Invoice 12/13/2024 Switch for Tractor AC 0.00 113.60 CRITICAL R CRITICAL REACH INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 350.00 72124 3951 Invoice 12/13/2024 APBnet 0.00 350.00
DANS JUNK DANIEL CHAVEZ 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 450.00 72125 039 Invoice 12/13/2024 Monarch Inn Temporary homeless shelter … 0.00 450.00 DAVE'S REP DAVE'S REPAIR SERVICE David L Gambetta 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 95.00 72126 37856 Invoice 12/13/2024 Monthly Sute Inspections 0.00 95.00 DEPT ACCNT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 431.00 72127 775112 Invoice 12/13/2024 Fingerprints 0.00 431.00
DIMES MEDI DIMES MEDIA CORPORATION 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 75.00 72128 4371 Invoice 12/13/2024 KRKC Ads 0.00 75.00
EARTHSYS EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 842.00 72129 851163 Invoice 12/13/2024 KC Plaza & Bulbout 0.00 842.00 EMC PLANN EMC PLANNING GROUP, INC. 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 6,386.03 72130 2302814 Invoice 12/13/2024 Env. Review Planning Services for Oct 0.00 3,049.36 241492 Invoice 12/13/2024 Environmental Review for EV Charging Stat… 0.00 3,336.67 RANDY FIDENCIO AMADO CID 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 240.00 72131 INV0045 Invoice 12/13/2024 Trunk or Treat Bounce Houses 0.00 240.00 KING'SSM FRANCISCO LOPEZ 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 70.00 72132 111524 Invoice 12/13/2024 Smog Check #113 0.00 70.00
FIRST TEE FUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION First Tee - Monterey County 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 27,500.01 72133 42191 Invoice 12/13/2024 Operation of Golf Course 0.00 9,166.67 42192 Invoice 12/13/2024 Operation of golf course 0.00 9,166.67 42193 Invoice 12/13/2024 Operation of Golf Course 0.00 9,166.67 GREGG BURK GREGG BURKMAN ELECTRIC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 204.25 72134 209 Invoice 12/13/2024 Fix lights in Janitorial Supply Room 0.00 204.25 CIVICPLUS ICON ENTERPRISES, INC. CivicPlus 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 10,884.30 72135 324877 Invoice 12/13/2024 Website 0.00 10,884.30
SCOFIELD IRMA SCOFIELD SCOFIELD GRAPHICS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 81.56 72136 3403 Invoice 12/13/2024 Alicia Trujillo Business Cards 0.00 81.56 CSCKC J & F LOCKWOOD INC CSC OF KING CITY 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 67.89 72137 001045823 Invoice 12/13/2024 Large Mower Repair 0.00 67.89 HUNTJ JAMES HUNT 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 250.00 72138
12032024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Department Community Scavenger Hunt 0.00 250.00 RODRIGUEJ JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 326.14 72139 12022024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Boot Allowance 2 pairs 0.00 326.14 TIRE KING JOSE RODRIGUEZ TIRE KING & AUTO EXPRESS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,203.66 72140 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 6 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 90812 Invoice 12/13/2024 New Front Tires Sweeper 0.00 1,203.66 PARAMOJU JULIA M HERNANDEZ 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 650.00 72141 MARC-DEC2024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Contract Services Translating City Council… 0.00 650.00 KEYEVID KEY EVIDENCE LOCK & SAFE INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 500.00 72142 135446 Invoice 12/13/2024 Annual Website 0.00 500.00
KC GLASS KING CITY GLASS SERVICES 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 981.25 72143 KC08290 Invoice 12/13/2024 Windshield Repair 0.00 981.25 KC IND KING CITY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 567.54 72144 359262 Invoice 12/13/2024 Zip Ties Park Closure Area 0.00 69.60 359522 Invoice 12/13/2024 Ties for park closure creekbridge / screen 0.00 76.13 359733 Invoice 12/13/2024 Xc Groves 0.00 326.14
359831 Invoice 12/13/2024 Small Gloves / PPE 0.00 95.67 LANGUAGE LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,745.58 72145 11469222 Invoice 12/13/2024 Translation 0.00 1,745.58
MNS ENGINE MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 12,188.00 72146 88067 Invoice 12/13/2024 Processional Services OCT 0.00 12,188.00 MO HEALTH MONTEREY COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 2,052.00 72147 KCY-PD 24-9 Invoice 12/13/2024 SART Exam 0.00 2,052.00
NATMC NATIVIDAD MEDICAL CENTER 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 31.00 72148 110624 Invoice 12/13/2024 Blood Draw 0.00 31.00
NEWSV NEW SV MEDIA INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 484.50 72149 128436 Invoice 12/13/2024 Cup24-000004 Public Hearing Notice 0.00 484.50 ODP ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 57.04 72150 394080806001 Invoice 12/13/2024 Backroom supply 0.00 11.73 394082391001 Invoice 12/13/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 23.24 394082396001 Invoice 12/13/2024 Office Supplies Mouse for HR 0.00 22.07 O'REILLY A O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 186.70 72151 3133-118470 Invoice 12/13/2024 Charger-unknown 0.00 55.03 3133-128453 Invoice 12/13/2024 unit #106 0.00 55.03
3133-134633 Invoice 12/13/2024 Truck 24 Repair 0.00 36.71 3133-134635 Credit Memo 12/13/2024 Mini Bulb 0.00 -8.90 3133-134805 Invoice 12/13/2024 Truck 24 repair 0.00 48.83 PG&E PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 50,514.96 72152 10232024 Invoice 12/13/2024 City Cameras 0.00 87.12
11212024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Internet for Cameras @ Fair grounds 0.00 223.25 11252024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Electricity 0.00 122.34
Oct-24 Invoice 12/13/2024 Gas & Electricity 0.00 50,082.25 PARTS & SE PARTS & SERVICE CTR- NAPA INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 44.24 72153 689703 Invoice 12/13/2024 Brake Cleaner for Shop 0.00 44.24 PURE WATER PENINSULA PURE WATER INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 102.45 72154 442824 Invoice 12/13/2024 Police Department 0.00 48.75
444358 Invoice 12/13/2024 Utilities-water 0.00 53.70
PBGFS PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,214.35 72155 111124 Invoice 12/13/2024 Postage 0.00 592.34
3106916159 Invoice 12/13/2024 Lease for meter 0.00 186.50 3106939781 Invoice 12/13/2024 Postage Machine Lease 0.00 435.51 PROSIO PROSIO COMMUNICATIONS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 445.84 72156 3220 Invoice 12/13/2024 Business Cards 0.00 445.84
Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 7 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount QUILL CORP QUILL CORPORATION 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 193.90 72157 41606334 Invoice 12/13/2024 Window Envelops 0.00 193.90 SL POWER SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 366.64 72158 51770 Invoice 12/13/2024 Generator Repair 0.00 366.64
SENTRY SENTRY ALARM SYSTEMS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 315.00 72159 2266148 Invoice 12/13/2024 Rec Center Alarm System 0.00 180.00 2266248 Invoice 12/13/2024 Security Contract 0.00 135.00 STERI STERICYCLE INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 150.47 72160 8008987361 Invoice 12/13/2024 Sharps 0.00 150.47
ADAMSS STEVEN ADAMS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 17.38 72161 112524 Invoice 12/13/2024 Amazon Purchases 0.00 17.38
SUN STREET SUN STREET CENTERS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 72162 KING-RKC-107 Invoice 12/13/2024 Cleaning of Broadway 0.00 1,000.00 SURVEI SURVEILLANCEGRID INTEGRATION INC. 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 8,318.69 72163 2081 Invoice 12/13/2024 Camera System Repairs 0.00 8,318.69 SWRCB - AC SWRCB - ACCOUNTING OFFICE 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 10,920.00 72164 SW-0296693 Invoice 12/13/2024 Annual Permit-MS4 0.00 10,920.00 THEGALLERY THE GALLERY COLLECTION PRUDENT PUBLISHING12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 670.87 72165 24E0059017 Invoice 12/13/2024 Christmas Cards 0.00 670.87 T - MOBILE T-MOBILE USA, INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 50.00 72166 9586253108 Invoice 12/13/2024 Investigation 0.00 50.00
TYLER TECH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 7,380.00 72167 025485574 Invoice 12/13/2024 Business License Conversion 0.00 4,000.00 025486277 Invoice 12/13/2024 System Conversion 0.00 3,120.00 025487978 Invoice 12/13/2024 Business License Conversion 0.00 260.00 UNION P UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 266.66 72168 90140945 Invoice 12/13/2024 Up Review of Project 0.00 266.66 U.S. BAN US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 2,968.70 72169 110624MO Invoice 12/13/2024 Bottled Water for Engines 0.00 114.80 11624OH Invoice 12/13/2024 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 1,682.74 120624JH Invoice 12/13/2024 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 1,171.16 VALLEY SAW VALLEY SAW & GARDEN EQUIPMENT 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 1,580.12 72170 104185 Invoice 12/13/2024 Concrete Saw / Cut Off Saw 0.00 1,580.12 CONTREVERO VERONICA CONTRERAS 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 350.20 72171 11202024 Invoice 12/13/2024 Annual JPA Meeting 0.00 165.61 120424 Invoice 12/13/2024 Christmas Raffle Prizes 0.00 184.59 WALLACEGR WALLACE GROUP A California Corporation 12/13/2024 Regular 0.00 693.75 72172 63599 Invoice 12/13/2024 PW Regulatory Compliance Assistance 202… 0.00 693.75 AFLAC AFLAC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 168.24 72173
INV0000317 Invoice 12/20/2024 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 85.58 INV0000318 Invoice 12/20/2024 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 82.66 ARBA AMERICAN RIVER BENEFIT ADM ARBA 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 45.22 72174 INV0000330 Invoice 12/20/2024 KCFC AD&D EMPLOYER 0.00 45.22 ANTHEM BLU ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 47,959.91 72175 INV0000321 Invoice 12/20/2024 HEALTH INSURANCE DEDUCTION 0.00 3,291.06 INV0000322 Invoice 12/20/2024 HEALTH INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 44,668.85 CAL PERS R CAL PERS RETIREMENTSYSTEM 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 30,983.70 72176 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 8 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000334 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYER 0.00 3,976.88 INV0000335 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYEE 0.00 3,916.24 INV0000336 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYER 0.00 6,294.20 INV0000337 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYEE 0.00 6,289.63 INV0000338 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 1,583.24 INV0000339 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 915.65 INV0000340 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS SAFETY CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 5,549.48 INV0000341 Invoice 12/20/2024 PERS SAFTEY CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 2,458.38 CACHLDSUP CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 522.00 72177 INV0000347 Invoice 12/20/2024 M. DILLON CHILD SUPPORT 0.00 522.00 E.D.I.S. EMPLOYER DRIVEN INSURANCE SERVICE 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 28,317.87 72178 INV0000319 Invoice 12/20/2024 ASI EMPLOYER SHARE 0.00 775.50 INV0000320 Invoice 12/20/2024 ASI MEDICAL EMPLOYER SHARE 0.00 27,542.37 K.C.P.O.A. K.C.P.O.A. 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 825.00 72179 INV0000326 Invoice 12/20/2024 KCPOA UNION DUES 0.00 825.00 K.C.P.S.A. K.C.P.S.A. 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 340.00 72180 INV0000327 Invoice 12/20/2024 KCPSA UNION DUES 0.00 340.00 ICMA RETIR MISSION SQUARE-302397 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 7,788.10 72181 INV0000313 Invoice 12/20/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 674.96 INV0000314 Invoice 12/20/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 639.27 INV0000315 Invoice 12/20/2024 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 443.82 INV0000323 Invoice 12/20/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 3,678.02 INV0000324 Invoice 12/20/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 2,056.76 INV0000325 Invoice 12/20/2024 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 295.27 MUTUAL OF OMAHA MUTUAL OF OMAHA 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 3,044.68 72182 INV0000331 Invoice 12/20/2024 DENTAL INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 708.89 INV0000332 Invoice 12/20/2024 DENTAL INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 420.84 INV0000333 Invoice 12/20/2024 DENTAL INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 1,378.08 INV0000343 Invoice 12/20/2024 VISION INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 78.30 INV0000344 Invoice 12/20/2024 VISION INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 34.40 INV0000345 Invoice 12/20/2024 VISION INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 149.72 INV0000346 Invoice 12/20/2024 VISION INSURANCE EMPLOYER 0.00 274.45 STAND INS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 1,740.03 72183 INV0000316 Invoice 12/20/2024 EMPLOYER SHARE - AD&D 0.00 141.33 INV0000328 Invoice 12/20/2024 STANDARD LIFE EMPLOYER 0.00 904.53 INV0000329 Invoice 12/20/2024 STANDARD LTD EMPLOYER 0.00 694.17 AT&T A T & T 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 89.49 72184
120324 Invoice 12/20/2024 Phone Bill 0.00 12.38
120524 Invoice 12/20/2024 Phone Service 0.00 77.11
ESTRADAA ADRIANA ESTRADA 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 20.00 72185 121624 Invoice 12/20/2024 Program Cancelled 0.00 20.00
KCTVHARD ALCANTAR HARDWARE INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 113.22 72186 575343 Invoice 12/20/2024 Command Strips 0.00 9.78
575514 Invoice 12/20/2024 Concrete for new stop sign on canal place. 0.00 11.94 575516 Invoice 12/20/2024 Mouse Traps Rec Center 0.00 31.71 575537 Invoice 12/20/2024 Repairs on Broken Windows at WWTF 0.00 59.79 AMAZON AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 1,345.79 72187 139W773YXKYT Invoice 12/20/2024 Saw Accesory for 8551 0.00 419.31 19FKH7M37LN9 Invoice 12/20/2024 Chlorinator Repair Part 0.00 22.40 1F3N43DRKNYT Invoice 12/20/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 29.35 1JP19LT7KY74 Invoice 12/20/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 71.56 1K6X3PNFVMYQ Invoice 12/20/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 19.45 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 9 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1KDQ91RYQV4V Invoice 12/20/2024 Replacement Lost Tool Box 0.00 15.84 1M3VJT1Y1WX4 Invoice 12/20/2024 Ink Cartridge for Printer 0.00 71.97 1MY7QKKPXGYH Invoice 12/20/2024 Various Small Tools 0.00 271.33 1PP43K1DTXP4 Invoice 12/20/2024 Office Paper Supplies 0.00 22.10 1PRMHMGN1NKR Invoice 12/20/2024 Saw For 8551 Part to fix Garbage Disposal 0.00 365.18 1QPMWD9PLGPD Invoice 12/20/2024 37.30 0.00 37.30
CARMEL FIR ART BLACK 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 750.00 72188 124544 Invoice 12/20/2024 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 124547 Invoice 12/20/2024 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 124548 Invoice 12/20/2024 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 AT & T-FIR AT & T MOBILITY 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 2,533.69 72189 120124 Invoice 12/20/2024 City Cell Phones 0.00 225.45
287299743011 Invoice 12/20/2024 Cell Phones FirstNet 0.00 2,308.24 BENITEZ SECURITY BENITEZ SECURITY SERVICES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 2,688.00 72190 2538 Invoice 12/20/2024 Monarch Inn Temporary Homeless Shelter 0.00 2,688.00 CAL WATER CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 18,111.44 72191 FY2425 Invoice 12/20/2024 California Water Service List 0.00 18,111.44 CHRIS MADS CHRIS MADSON CONSTRUCTION INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 14,650.00 72192 0052 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outdoor dining grant reimbursement 0.00 14,650.00 CNC ELECTR CLARK N CLEVENGER CNC ELECTRIC AND OUTDOOR POWER 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 225.03 72193 7780 Invoice 12/20/2024 New Chainsaw Chains 0.00 53.27
7805 Invoice 12/20/2024 Service Kits / Parts Handtools 0.00 171.76 DECOBALLOO DANNYA ITHZEL GONZALES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 840.00 72194 63 Invoice 12/20/2024 City Holiday Party Decor 0.00 840.00 DEPT ACCNT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 514.00 72195 782030 Invoice 12/20/2024 Fingerprints 0.00 514.00
EARTHSYS EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 2,732.30 72196 851733 Invoice 12/20/2024 KC Plaza & Bulbout 0.00 110.00 851747 Invoice 12/20/2024 Division ST Pavement Rehab. 0.00 2,622.30 EMC PLANN EMC PLANNING GROUP, INC. 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 171.63 72197 240712 Invoice 12/20/2024 KC Streetscape 0.00 171.63
KING'SSM FRANCISCO LOPEZ 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 100.00 72198 121624 Invoice 12/20/2024 Smog for Topkick Per the Bureau of Auto… 0.00 100.00 FRANK'S GA FRANK'S GARDENING SERVICE FRANK LOPEZ 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 450.00 72199 12012412KC Invoice 12/20/2024 Landscape Maint 0.00 450.00 CERVANTESJ JAQUI CERVANTES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 20.00 72200 121624 Invoice 12/20/2024 Program Cancelled 0.00 20.00
TIRE KING JOSE RODRIGUEZ TIRE KING & AUTO EXPRESS 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 6,231.51 72201 90624 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 1,296.44
90653 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 644.42
90671 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 794.28
90688 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 1,401.60
90693 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 180.22
90703 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 1,265.93
90765 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 194.75
90775 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 288.87
90797 Invoice 12/20/2024 Veh. Repair 0.00 165.00
KIMLEY-HOR KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 37,305.12 72202 29141416 Invoice 12/20/2024 KICYWMA Construction 0.00 7,607.50 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 10 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 30378894 Invoice 12/20/2024 KC San Antonio / Broadway 0.00 29,697.62 KC GLASS KING CITY GLASS SERVICES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 981.25 72203 KC18757 Invoice 12/20/2024 Windshield Repairs 0.00 981.25 LGMPUMP LUIS RUIZ 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 16,685.00 72204 5452 Invoice 06/30/2024 Pump Service 0.00 16,685.00
METROUNIFORM MADERA UNIFORM & ACCESSORIES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 16,801.90 72205 285503 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vests 0.00 1,680.19
285504 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285505 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285506 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285507 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285508 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285509 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285510 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285511 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 285513 Invoice 12/20/2024 Outer Vest Carrier 0.00 1,680.19 ODP ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 224.37 72206 397012733001 Invoice 12/20/2024 Office Supplies 0.00 122.50 397012733002 Invoice 12/20/2024 Break Room Supplies 0.00 51.32 397018043001 Invoice 12/20/2024 Break Room Supplies 0.00 50.55 PURE WATER PENINSULA PURE WATER INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 48.75 72207 444359 Invoice 12/20/2024 Water 0.00 48.75
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-CITY HALL CITY OF KING 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 346.87 72208 121724 Invoice 12/20/2024 Petty Cash Transactions 0.00 346.87 GAMETIME PLAYCORE WISCONSIN INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 1,269.01 72209 0256333 Invoice 12/20/2024 Landing Pad /Swing for parks 0.00 1,269.01 RAILPROS RAILPROS INC RAIL CONSULTING SERVICES 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 4,978.25 72210 1300399 Invoice 12/20/2024 KC Temporary Platform Nov24 0.00 4,978.25 RAZZOLINK RAZZO LINK INC RAZZOLINK 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 34.90 72211 411183 Invoice 12/20/2024 Website Maint. Agreement 0.00 34.90 SALVALP S & L INVESTMENT SALINAS VALLEY PRO SQUAD 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 520.02 72212 0229044 Invoice 12/20/2024 Mendoza Class A Jacket 0.00 520.02 GEORGE L M SO MO CO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL George L. Mee Memorial Hospita 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 50.00 72213 90144748 Invoice 12/20/2024 Worker Comp Medicine 0.00 50.00 ADAMSS STEVEN ADAMS 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 73.70 72214 121924 Invoice 12/20/2024 Meeting MBAMG 0.00 73.70
SWRCB - AC SWRCB - ACCOUNTING OFFICE 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 94,214.00 72215 0279564 Invoice 12/20/2024 Annual Permit Fee - Industrial WW 0.00 28,205.00 0279594 Invoice 12/20/2024 Annual Permit WWTF 0.00 34,901.00 0279802 Invoice 12/20/2024 Annual Domestic Permit Fee 0.00 3,945.00 0279844 Invoice 12/20/2024 Annual Permit Fee - KC Landfill 0.00 27,163.00 GARCIATE TERRY GARCIA 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 32.60 72216 120324 Invoice 12/20/2024 Cable Ties for Department 0.00 32.60 TOPES TOPE'S TREE SERVICE INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 22,320.00 72217 33779 Invoice 12/20/2024 SE Tree Triming 0.00 22,320.00 TYLER TECH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 130.00 72218 025489168 Invoice 12/20/2024 System Conversion 0.00 130.00 U.S. BAN US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 8,909.23 72219 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 11 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 110824SA Invoice 12/20/2024 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 8,021.16 120624AW Invoice 12/20/2024 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 450.59 120624OH Invoice 12/20/2024 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 437.48 VERIZON WI VERIZON WIRELESS 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 556.65 72221 111224 Invoice 12/20/2024 Wireless Bill 0.00 556.65
CONTREVERO VERONICA CONTRERAS 12/20/2024 Regular 0.00 348.14 72222 121724 Invoice 12/20/2024 Caipeira Conference 0.00 80.50 121724B Invoice 12/20/2024 Holiday Dinner Purchases 0.00 267.64 ARBA AMERICAN RIVER BENEFIT ADM ARBA 12/30/2024 Regular 0.00 49.98 72223 INV0000035 Invoice 08/16/2024 KCFC AC&D EMPLOYER 0.00 49.98 CARMEL FIR ART BLACK 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 72233 124559 Invoice 12/31/2024 Anytime Fitness 0.00 250.00
2024-10 Invoice 12/31/2024 Billing cycle 24Z 0.00 2,750.00 BENITEZ SECURITY BENITEZ SECURITY SERVICES 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 2,688.00 72234 2548 Invoice 12/31/2024 Monarch Inn temporary homeless shelter … 0.00 2,688.00 CSC OF SAL CSC OF SALINAS 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 10.61 72235 001047958 Invoice 12/31/2024 Equipment Repair for Jetta Machine - Sew… 0.00 10.61 DEPT CONS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIV. OF ADMIN. SERVICES-ACCNT. 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 694.94 72236 123124 Invoice 12/31/2024 Strong Motion Quarterly Report 0.00 694.94 GRIDIRON GRIDIRON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 468.00 72237 000440 Invoice 12/31/2024 Dillion FTO Training 0.00 468.00 KCGLASS KING CITY GLASS 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 6,496.20 72238 2 Invoice 12/31/2024 Facade Improve. Grant Payment 2 - B2 Br… 0.00 6,496.20 MNS ENGINE MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 13,098.00 72239 88294 Invoice 12/31/2024 Nov 2024 Nino Homes 0.00 13,098.00 MONTERE P MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 150,000.00 72240 04-23 RET Invoice 12/31/2024 Partial Retention Payment for Streetscape 0.00 150,000.00 STEPUP STEP P ON SECOND STREET, INC 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 68,892.00 72241 2024-12 Invoice 12/31/2024 Rent Assistance Program 0.00 68,892.00 TYLER TECH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 2,400.00 72242 025488242 Invoice 12/31/2024 New UB System 0.00 2,400.00 U.S. BAN US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 317.64 72243 122024MA Invoice 12/31/2024 Planning + Engineering Adobe Membership 0.00 39.98 544226053 Invoice 12/31/2024 Copier Lease 0.00 277.66
U.S. BAN US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 -317.64 72243 U.S. BANCO US BANCORP EQUIPMENT FINANCE 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 277.66 72244 544226053 Invoice 12/31/2024 Copier Lease 0.00 277.66
U.S. BAN US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 39.98 72245 120624 Invoice 12/31/2024 Planning & Engineering Adobe Membership 0.00 39.98 U.S. POSTA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 12/31/2024 Regular 0.00 1,085.25 72246 Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 12 of 13
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 123124 Invoice 12/31/2024 Newsletter Postage 0.00 1,085.25 Total Regular: 0.00 1,598,824.95
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code POOL-WFB Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
144
0 1
0 24

0.00 0.00

0.00 169 0.00
Payment
1,599,142.59

0.00 -317.64

0.00 244,991.44
1,843,816.39
Payable
Count
286
0 0
0 50
336
Check Report Date Range: 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2024
1/6/2025 3:17:21 PM Page 13 of 13
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
144
0 1
0 24

0.00 0.00

0.00 169 0.00
1,599,142.59

0.00 -317.64

0.00 244,991.44
1,843,816.39
286
0 0
0 50
336
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 Pooled Cash Fund 12/2024 1,843,816.39
1,843,816.39
Item No. 9 (C)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO MASTER FEE

SCHEDULE
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule to apply an inflationary adjustment and overall update.

BACKGROUND:

The City maintains a Master Fee Schedule of all user fees. The purpose of the user fees is for users of services to pay the cost of providing that service rather than the general public through General Fund tax revenue. Fees are based upon the cost of providing each service, although some services remain partially subsidized where there is determined to be a public benefit.

An annual review is conducted by staff. As a result, staff are recommending an amendment to the Master Fee Schedule to address ongoing inflationary increases in the City’s cost to provide its services, as well as other changes to reflect ongoing operational needs.

DISCUSSION:

Cost recovery is particularly important now that the local sales tax measure failed, and excess funds do not exist to increase subsidies for the City’s services.

Based on the annual review, staff are recommending fee adjustments to the majority of the City’s user fees. The recommended changes are based on applying a 5% increase and then rounding to the nearest dollar for small fees or five or ten dollars for larger fees. Some of the smaller fees are also increased to the next dollar if the 5% resulted in less than a 50 cent increase.

Other changes include new fees proposed to address areas that have been identified as needed, which include the following:

Item No. 9(D)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF KING KCCP PAYMENTS FOR
THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council receive and file.

BACKGROUND:

At least once a month, the City Treasurer shall submit to the City Council, a copy of the invoices paid for the previous month.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this item is to provide the Council an opportunity to review and monitor ongoing expenditures. These documents are attached.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

No Environmental Review required for this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Receive and file the report; or

2. Provide other direction to staff regarding requests for additional information.

Item No. 10 (A)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER

7.34 OF THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
FIREWORKS AND A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 2025

FIREWORKS PERMIT PROCESS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) introduce to be read by title only an Ordinance amending provisions of Chapter 7.34 of Title 7 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to fireworks, open the hearing, allow for public testimony, close the hearing, waive first reading of the Ordinance, and approve the introduction of the Ordinance; and 2) adopt a Resolution setting forth the number of permits to sell fireworks and the method of selection of permit holders.

BACKGROUND:

In 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance Number 691 establishing Chapter

7.34 of the King City Municipal Code governing the limited allowance of the sale and use of safe and sane fireworks in the City limits. Section 7.34.030(c) calls for the City Council, in the calendar month of January, to set by Resolution or by minute order the number of permits to be issued for the sale of safe and sane fireworks, the form of application for such permit and for the method of selection.

Staff have completed their annual review of the process. Some minor changes are proposed to the process set forth in the Municipal Code, fees and due dates.

DISCUSSION:

Periodic adjustments have been made to the fireworks booth permit process to address concerns identified by non-profit groups that have participated. No changes have been made for several years, and staff believe the process has

CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.34 OF THE

KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO FIREWORKS AND A
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 2025 FIREWORKS PERMIT PROCESS JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 3
worked well since that time with no complaints. Therefore, no changes are recommended this year to the number of permits and how the permits are issued. The Resolution sets forth that a maximum of three fireworks booth permits will be issued with no permits allotted to pre-designated groups. If more than three applications are received, a lottery will be conducted at the March 25, 2025 Council Meeting.

There were some issues identified last year regarding inconsistencies with the Municipal Code provisions involving deadlines for submitting specific documentation. Currently, submittal of the application is required the first week in March, and permittees are selected by the end of March. Submittal of final paperwork is required by mid-April. However, the Municipal Code requires the completed application to be submitted by the end of March and sets forth that the application shall include items that have been considered part of the final paperwork.

The timing problem is that applicants do not want to submit a temporary sales tax permit from the State Board of Equalization, State Fire Marshal Retail Fireworks License, or Certificate of Insurance until they have been selected to be a permittee since there are fees associated with obtaining those items. Therefore, staff recommend City Council introduce an Ordinance addressing these issues by clarifying which documents can be submitted separate from the permit and setting forth that due dates be established by City Council resolution.

Modifications also include other cleanup language.

This action deals only with safe and sane fireworks. The City has received a number of ongoing complaints regarding the amount of illegal fireworks that are discharged during the July 4th holiday period. As a result, enforcement has increased over the past couple years. Use of the new drones has enabled the Police Department to issue more citations. An additional option would be to modify the Ordinance to reduce the number of days that fireworks are allowed.

This would reduce the period that the Police Department would need to increase enforcement activities. However, it could also create confusion trying the reeducate the community and divert enforcement resources away from illegal fireworks to those using safe and sane fireworks.

COST ANALYSIS:

Fees have been adjusted as part of CPI adjustments to the overall Master Fee Schedule. Recommended fees include an increase from $37 to $39 for the application, $375 to $395 for the permit, and $150 will remain the same for an

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-833

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KING, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7.34 OF
TITLE 7 OF THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE, FIREWORKS
WHEREAS, the City of King (“City”) is authorized by the California Constitution, Article XI, Section 7 to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and
WHEREAS, the City regulates the sale and discharge of fireworks within the City to protect public health, welfare and safety; and
WHEREAS, the King City Municipal Code sets forth a process for issuing permits to nonprofit organizations for sale of safe and sane fireworks; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to modify the process to address issues that have been identified with due dates and documentation required as part of the application process.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING FINDS AND ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings.

SECTION 2. The Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that it will have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3).) Further, the adoption and implementation of this Ordinance is not a project, as defined in CEQA Guidelines section 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, either directly or indirectly, and is therefore not subject to environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15060(c)(3).

SECTION 3. The Sub-Section of Chapter 7.34, Section 7.34.030 of the King City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 7.34.030 Permit required – Issuance-Limitations. (a) Except as provided in this chapter, it is unlawful to offer for sale or sell at retail “safe and sane fire-works fireworks” without having first applied for and been issued a permit therefor, in the manner set forth in this chapter.
(b) Permits for the sale of safe and sane fireworks shall be issued only to nonprofit organizations, and such fireworks shall be sold only at the outdoor sales stands, as more specifically set forth hereinafter.
(c) In the year 2011 there shall be issued four permits, one to the King City Fireworks Foundation, one to the King City Chamber of Commerce and Agriculture, and two awarded -2-
by lot. The lottery shall take place at a time, place and manner determined by the city council in accordance with administrative rules and procedures adopted by the city council.

Beginning in the year 2012 t The city council shall meet in January and set the number and method of selection for each permit. Said setting and selection may be done by resolution or by minute order.
(d) No nonprofit organization may receive more than one permit for fireworks sale during any one calendar year; one permit may be issued to two qualifying applicants as a joint venture. (e) Any applicant that has had a fireworks sales permit suspended or revoked within the prior three years shall be eligible for a fireworks sales permit only upon demonstrating to the fire chief’s reasonable satisfaction that suitable arrangements have been made to preclude future violations.

SECTION 4. The Sub-Section of Chapter 7.34, Section 7.34.040 of the King City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 7.34.040 Permit application – Regulations – Limitations (a) All applications for a permit to sell fireworks may be filed with the fire department city between the first business day in March and the last business day in March of each year, except that for the year 2011 applications must be submitted no later than April 1st. All applications shall be and accompanied by an application fee by a deadline and in an amount set by resolution of the city council.
(b) All permit applications must be properly completed and submitted to the King City fire department before the close of business on the last business day in March, except that for the year 2011 applications must be submitted no later than April 1, 2011. Permit applications that are incomplete or filed late shall not be processed. (c) All permit applications shall be made in writing on a form supplied by the city. A completed permit application package shall include:
(1) Proper identification and signature of the permit applicant; (2) The proposed location of the fireworks sales stand; (3) The dates and hours the applicant proposes to operate the stand; (4) A detailed description of the fireworks proposed to be sold; (5) The written consent of the owner of record and/or lessor in control of the property upon which the proposed sales stand will be located;
(6) The plan for staffing the stand during the proposed days and hours of operation; (7) The fireworks distributor’s business name, address, telephone number, and person that is the point of contact;
-3-
(d) After permit recipients have been selected through a process set forth by resolution of the city council, submittal of additional documentation required prior to issuance of a permit shall include:
(81) Proof of a temporary sales tax permit from the State Board of Equalization or proof of application;
(92) Proof of insurance to include one million dollars public liability, property damage, and product liability coverage with riders attached to the policies designating the city as an additional insured;
(103) Proof of a State Fire Marshal Retail Fireworks License; and (114) Such other information and documentation that the fire chief in his or her reasonable discretion may require.
(de) Each applicant shall file with the city, at the time of filing the permit application, a nonrefundable application fee as may be established by resolution of the city council and a refundable cash deposit, certificate of deposit, or a surety bond made payable to the city in the amount as set by resolution of the city council to assure compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Such deposit certificate or bond shall be refundable upon compliance with the provisions and requirements of this chapter, including, but not limited to, the removal of the sales stand, cleaning of the site, and full passage of the city’s final site inspection. (ef) The fire chief is authorized to promulgate administrative regulations and procedures necessary for the successful and effective implementation of this chapter including rules and procedures governing the submission of applications for permits to sell safe and sane fireworks, inspections of firework stands, operation of fireworks stands, and such regulations relating to the sale of safe and sane fireworks as may be necessary for the protection of life and property. Said administrative regulations and procedures shall be set forth in writing and are subject to prior approval by the city attorney.

SECTION 5. The Sub-Section of Chapter 7.34, Section 7.34.060 of the King City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 7.34.050 Prerequisites to issuance of permit
(a) The application must be a non-profit organization that conducts its activities primarily for the benefit of the city and its residents.
(b) The applicant must have been organized and established in the city’s corporate limits for a minimum of one year continuously preceding the filing of application for the permit, and must have a bona fide membership of at least ten members who are residents of the city.

The King City Fireworks Foundation is excepted from this requirement.

SECTION 6. The Sub-Section of Chapter 7.34, Section 7.34.060 of the King City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
-4-
Section 7.34.060 Permit applications – Notice of acceptance or rejection – Selection procedure – Fee
(a) The fire chief city shall notify all applicants thirty days after the final permit application deadline regarding the results of the lottery and the applicants that have been granted permits consistent with the process set forth by resolution of the city council., except that for the year 2011 the fire chief shall make this notification by May 1st. (b) All applicants that have been granted permits shall, prior to issuance of the permit, pay a permit fee in an amount set by resolution of the city council. The permit fee is intended to cover the cost of issuance of the permit and the first inspection of the fireworks stand. Any necessary subsequent inspections shall be subject to a reinspection fee in an amount as set by resolution of the city council. The refundable deposit, certificate of deposit or a surety bond made payable to the city and provided by the applicant pursuant to subsection (d) of Section 7.34.040, shall be held by the city to be available to cover the cost of removal of the fireworks sales stand, in accordance with subsection (m) of Section 7.34.090. (c) Each applicant that has been granted a permit shall have no less than two members of its sales staff attend an complete operator safety training seminar administered as required by the city of King City fire department.

SECTION 7. All other portions of Chapter 7.34 remain in full force and effect:

SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) calendar days after its final passage and adoption. Within fifteen (15) calendar days after its adoption, the Ordinance, or a summary of the Ordinance, shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced by the City Council after waiving reading, except by Title, at a regular meeting thereof held on the _____ day of _________________ 2025, and adopted the Ordinance after the second reading at a regular meeting held on the ____ day of _______________ 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
-5-
ATTEST
ERICA SONNE, City Clerk

CITY OF KING
By:

MIKE LEBARRE, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
I, ______________________________, City Clerk of the City of King, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of the Ordinance passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King on the date and by the vote indicated herein.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5023

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING

SETTING FORTH THE NUMBER OF PERMITS TO SELL FIREWORKS

AND THE METHOD OF SELECTION OF PERMIT HOLDERS
WHEREAS, in 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinance Number 691 establishing Chapter 7.34 of the King City Municipal Code governing the limited allowance of the sale and use of safe and sane fireworks in the City limits; and
WHEREAS, Section 7.34.030(c) calls for the City Council, in the calendar month of January, to set, by Resolution or by minute order, the number of permits to be issued for the sale of safe and sane fireworks, the form of application for such permit and for the method of selection, and
WHEREAS, Section 7.34.040 (a) allows the City Council to set a fee for applying for such permit; and
WHEREAS, Section 7.34.100 allows the City Council to establish a regulatory fee for those entities that do receive a permit to reimburse the City for costs associated with administering and enforcing the permit process and activities allowed under the permits.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of King as follows:

1. The number of fireworks sale permit holders for the calendar year shall be set at three to be awarded to non-profit community organizations.

2. If applications exceed the number of permits, the permit recipients shall be selected by lottery conducted by the City Manager or designee at a public time and place, which shall be notified to all applicants.

3. Permit fees shall be established at $39 for application, $395 for a fireworks sale permit, and $150 if an inspection is requested after business hours.

4. The application with requirements and due dates is approved as attached and included herein as Exhibit A, which shall be available to the public on February 6, 2025 and due to City Hall by 5:00 p.m., March 6, 2025.

This resolution was passed and adopted this 14th day of January, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, Council Members:

NAYS, Council Members:

ABSENT, Council Members:

ABSTAIN, Council Members:

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Mike LeBarre, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Roy Santos, City Attorney
KrrNG CrrTY

CALIFORN IA
2025 FIREWORKS PERMIT APPLICATION
Applications available: February 6, 2025 City of King RECEIVED date stamp Application Deadline: MARCH 6, 2025 at 5:00 PM NO EXEPTIONS! City Review of eligibility: March 10-14, 2025
Announcement of qualified applicants: March 19, 2025
City selection of permittee: March 25, 2025
Final paperwork due from permittee: April 23, 2025
Received by Initials:

Please complete the entire application for consideration. Return the completed application to: City of King, 212 S. Vanderhurst Avenue, King City, CA 93930 with an application fee of $39 (non-refundable) payable to the City of King. If selected, a permit fee of $395 will be required, plus a $100.00 refundable cleaning deposit, certificate of deposit, or a surety bond made payable to the City and provided by the applicant pursuant to subsection D of section 7.34.040 of the KCMC (King City Municipal Codes).

Proof of Non-profit status is also required.

Date sales to begin: _/_/_ Date sales to end: _/_/_
ireworks ma)" only be sold from noon June 28th through .July 4 th at 8:00 P.M.

Proposed hours of sales: ______ AM _____ PM
Category:

D School D Youth Organization D Community Organization D Religious/Frat/Svc. Organization Name of Organization: ___________________ Phone No'
s: ________ _
Physical Address of Organization: ---------------------� King City, 93930 Mailing Address of Organization, all correspondence will be sent to this address:

Contact Name: ------------------- Phone No's ----------- Address: _________________ ____________________ _
Name & Address of Joint Applicant (if applicable): _____________________ _ Principal Officers:

Name: ----------------------
Name: ______________________ _
Name: ______________________ _
Organizations Tax Exempt Status:
(Copies of IRS 50 I (C)3 letter of certification, Franchise Tax Board Certificate or other proof of non-profit status MUST be attached and included at the time application packet is submitted) Title: -------------
Title: --- ---------
Title: -------------
RECEIPTING AREA (office use area)

EXHIBIT A

Item No. 10 (B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER

20.04 OF THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council introduce to be read by title only an Ordinance amending provisions of Chapter 20.04 of Title 20 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to administrative citations, open the hearing, allow for public testimony, close the hearing, waive first reading of the Ordinance, and approve the introduction of the Ordinance.

BACKGROUND:

The Municipal Code sets forth that fine amounts for administrative citations shall be set forth in a schedule of fines established by City Council Resolution. The City’s schedule of fines was last updated in 2002. As a result, staff have begun working on the process of drafting a new schedule of fines to ensure it is accurate and can be easily updated on a regular basis in the future. As part of the process, a minor amendment to the Ordinance is recommended to help ensure that the public has easy access to the fine amounts to support adopting the fines by Resolution rather than Ordinance.

DISCUSSION:

Update of the fine schedule is labor intensive because many of the fines have been established and/or changed by Ordinances amending different sections of the Municipal Code regarding specific violations. Therefore, some citations have been established by Ordinance and others by Resolution, which makes a comprehensive update challenging.

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-834

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KING, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20.04 OF
TITLE 20 OF THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE,

ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS
WHEREAS, the City of King (“City”) is authorized by the California Constitution, Article XI, Section 7 to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and
WHEREAS, the City establishes administrative fine amounts for penalties for violations related to Municipal Code Violations; and
WHEREAS, the King City Municipal Code sets forth a requirement to establish and amend fine amounts by adopting a Resolution approving a fine schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to modify the fine schedule provisions to better ensure public access to fine amounts.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING FINDS AND ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings.

SECTION 3. The Sub-Section of Chapter 20.04, Section 20.04.040 of the King City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 20.04.040. Amount of fines.
(a) The amounts of the fines for code violations imposed pursuant to this title shall be set forth in the schedule of fines established by resolution of the city council. (b) The schedule of fines shall specify any increased fines for repeat violations of the same code provision within thirty-six months from the date of an administrative citation. (c) The schedule of fines shall specify the amount of any late payment charges imposed for the payment of a fine after its due date.
(d) The schedule of fines shall be available to the public at city hall and posted on the city website.
-2-
SECTION 4. All other portions of Chapter 20.04 remain in full force and effect:

SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST
ERICA SONNE, City Clerk

CITY OF KING
By:

MIKE LEBARRE, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
-3-
I, ______________________________, City Clerk of the City of King, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of the Ordinance passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King on the date and by the vote indicated herein.

Item No. 11 (A)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council approve adjustments to the FY 2024-25 Budget.

BACKGROUND:

The City typically conducts a mid-year review of the annual budget and recommends adjustments based upon changes that have occurred. Staff are proposing the mid-year review be completed early this year due to financial challenges that have occurred so staff can ensure available reductions can be made before they occur.

These challenges result from several factors, including failure of the proposed sales tax measure that was intended to provide contingency funds, a projected reduction in sales tax revenues, and major unanticipated expenditures. The most notable expenditures were caused by flooding damage to the golf course, which has increased the City’s subsidy of the golf course operation and created a significant local share expense for the golf course renovation project. Additional costs have also occurred due to problems with the permanent supportive housing project, including both a local share of the cost for property acquisition and litigation costs.

The cumulative cost impact of these items may exceed $1 million. Since the City utilized reserves in FY 2023-24, it is important to minimize the additional drawdown of reserves as much as possible. This is particularly important because the funding identified in the Unfunded Priority Needs Plan for long-term financial stability and building reserves will not be available with the failure of Measure T. Staff believe the City will need to proceed with a very prudent and

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 5
austere budget approach since it will be challenging to fund priority items with a continued local sales tax rate less than most other cities. The proposed approach will be to cut most spending for discretionary items and focus on maintaining core City service levels and staffing.

DISCUSSION:

Assumptions
The mid-year budget is normally completed later in the year to have better revenue projections and final budget figures from the prior fiscal year. Therefore, staff’s analysis and assumptions are based on preliminary data. Additional adjustments to the projections will need to be made when the new budget is prepared.

General Fund Balance
The City finished FY 2022-23 with a fund balance in the General Fund of approximately $3 million. The good news is that preliminary estimates for yearend costs and revenues for FY 2023-24 will substantially increase the reserve to somewhere in the range of $4 to $5 million. Therefore, the City will be in a good position to address unanticipated budget impacts on this year’s budget.

It is important to note several factors regarding the excess revenues projected from FY 2023-24:
• A portion of the amount was due to grant revenues received in FY 2023-24 for expenses incurred in FY 2022-23.
• A large amount of the savings was from unexpended funds budgeted for capital projects that were delayed. A portion of these costs have instead been expended in FY 2024-25. Therefore, it will add to the use of reserves in this fiscal year.

Since the existing budget is approximately $10.5 million, it will be necessary to maintain a balance of $2,100,000 to maintain the City’s reserve policy of 20%.

Budget Goals
The following priority goals adopted by the City Council for the current and upcoming budget cycles include the following:

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 3 OF 5
FY 2024-25
• Maintain existing staffing and core service levels.
• Fund renovation of the King City Golf Course.
• Fund the homeless permanent supportive housing project. • Complete the Downtown Plaza and Visitor and History Center projects. • Complete façade and outdoor dining projects currently underway FY 2025-26/ FY 2026-27:
• Maintain existing staffing and service levels for core priority services. • Maintain the City’s reserve policy goal of 20% of the General Fund operational budget.
• Complete the roundabout and bike path projects.
• Pursue additional grant funding and obtain approvals for the multimodal transit project, completion of the streetscape project, and the citywide planting strip project.
• Promote new housing development.
• Fund professional consultant services to assist the City in developing the proposed 2026 sales tax measure and outreach effort.

Recommended Adjustments
The following budget adjustments are recommended, which include preliminary changes in revenue projections, projected expenditure impacts, and proposed strategies for reducing costs and increasing revenues. Please note that staff are only requesting the City Council approve adjustments to the FY 2024-25 budget at this time. The adjustments to the FY 2025-26 budget are only a forecast at this time to provide an idea of the budget situation the City will be facing moving forward and to begin planning. It does not include other revenue projections, unknown expenditures, or changes in staffing costs. Therefore, additional work to achieve a balanced budget still remains. However, staff is interested in City Council feedback at this time with regard to proposed changes to assist with budget planning and preparation.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 4 OF 5
Adjustment Adjustment
Item FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Reduction in sales tax revenue projections -$408,653 -$393,579 Increase in liability insurance costs $0 -$165,806
Increase in employee medical insurance costs $0 -$50,000 Local share of golf course renovation project -$551,000 $0 City share of cost to complete the homekey project -$300,000 $0 Consultant services for local sales tax measure $0 -$60,000 Carryover capital improvement project expenditures $600,000 $0 Funds from KPPC appropriated for the homekey project $75,000 $0 Eliminate General Fund expenditure for street improvements $150,000 $150,000 Eliminate General Fund expenditure for sidewalk repairs $0 $50,000 Eliminate General Fund expenditure for ADA improvements $50,000 $50,000 Proposed increase to the Waste Management franchise fee $0 $45,000 Proposed Waste Management franchise renewal signing fee $25,000 $0 Eliminate contribution for July 3rd fireworks show $7,500 $7,500 Eliminate King City in Bloom contribution $5,000 $5,000 Eliminate proposed volunteer recognition event $2,000 $2,000 Reduce City contribution towards the Ciclovia event $5,000 $5,000 Eliminate façade enhancement grant program $15,000 $50,000 Eliminate City funds for entertainment at the Downtown Plaza $15,000 $15,000 User fee increases $10,000 $25,000
Eliminate facilitator for annual leadership staff retreat $5,000 $5,000 Eliminate disaster response consultant training services $5,000 $5,000 Eliminate economic development consultant services $5,000 $5,000 Eliminate grant writing consultant services $0 $7,500
Reduction in Worker's Compensation insurance cost $0 $78,768 50% increase to hangar rental leases $0 $45,000
Maintain Police Records Technician position vacancy $40,000 $70,000 -$1,445,153 -$48,617
The overall proposed strategy is to maintain the City’s fiscal position and focus work on wrapping up existing projects until the City can revisit another sales tax measure to proceed with other service and capital improvements. When the draft budget is prepared, if projections for other revenue sources increase and/or expenses decrease, staff will propose adding back some of these items.

COST ANALYSIS:

Based on the analysis, the budget changes will reduce the use of reserves in this fiscal year to approximately $1.45 million. This will likely maintain a reserve

Item No. 11 (B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: OCTAVIO HURTADO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY

ENGINEER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF THE SAN ANTONIO DRIVE / BROADWAY

STREET BIKE PATH AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) receive a presentation and update on the San Antonio Drive / Broadway Street Bike Path & Safe Routes to Schools Improvements Project; 2) adopt the initial study/negative declaration (IS/ND); and 3) approve the Project prior to submittal to CTC for PS&E Phase funding allocation.

BACKGROUND:

In 2023, the City was awarded $11,043,000 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 6 Small Urban & Rural Component funds for the San Antonio Drive Path & Safe Routes to Schools Improvements Project.

The project includes a 1.6-mile paved bicycle and pedestrian path, three roundabouts and closure of sidewalk and ADA curb ramp gaps along San Antonio Drive from Mildred Avenue to Broadway Street. The project will reduce travel lanes, crossing distances and exposure to motorized traffic by installing a 14-feet trail with a 5-feet landscape buffer on both sides for pedestrian and bicyclist connectivity as illustrated in the location map below.

At the January 23, 2024, meeting, the City Council approved a contract with Kimley Horn to prepare a Project Approval and Environmental Review. The preliminary results were presented to the City Council at the October 22, 2024 meeting, and City Council directed staff to proceed with the public outreach process.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF THE SAN ANTONIO DRIVE PATH AND SAFE ROUTES

TO SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 5
DISCUSSION:

The project is currently in the Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED) Phase, which includes the constructability review of the project in conformance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and will establish project limits and identify mitigation measures on the project. The PA&ED review includes the proposed work plan, schedule, environmental requirements, and identify construction impacts. An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was prepared to determine the most appropriate intersection control type along Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue. The CEQA analysis and ICE memo have been completed and are included as attachments.

This phase also includes public outreach, consisting of a public workshop, a presentation at a City Council meeting, and a presentation to the South Monterey County Joint Union High School District Board. The City Council presentation took place on October 22, 2024, the public workshop on December 11, 2024 and the High School Board presentation at their January 8, 2025 meeting. The public

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF THE SAN ANTONIO DRIVE PATH AND SAFE ROUTES

TO SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 3 OF 5
workshop consisted of a presentation about the project including the results of the comprehensive traffic analysis and realistic renderings, as well as a breakout session during which members of the public were able to ask questions and voice feedback or concerns. In addition, a public education video was created, which was posted on social media and encouraged those interested to attend the January 14th meeting to provide input. Based on the feedback received during the outreach efforts, the consultant will proceed with the preparation of geometric approval drawings.

The Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) report concluded that a roundabout is the preferred alternative for each of the study intersections (along Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue).

The Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) is a data-driven, performance-based framework and approach used to objectively screen alternatives and identify an optimal geometric and control solution for an intersection. The optimal solution is analyzed via a benefit to cost ratio (BCR) by monetizing the societal costs associated with safety (collisions), delay, GHG emissions, operations & maintenance, and initial capital costs. The analysis first compares each proposed alternative to the existing condition, and then each alternative to one another.

While traditional stop controls (stops and signals) may have less initial capital costs, roundabouts dramatically reduce the amount of injury collisions and generally have reduced maintenance costs.

In addition to an ICE benefit-cost analysis, the project team completed a sophisticated traffic analysis of the proposed Broadway Street corridor to model how the project will operate with today’s traffic volumes and in the future with anticipated growth and planned developments. The computer simulation was based on actual peak traffic counts including vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists.

Three alternatives were considered at Mildred Street: an all-way stop control, a traffic signal, and a mini-roundabout. Each corridor analysis alternative includes lane reductions along Broadway Street and the intersection improvements are driven by the need to provide enough space for the proposed bike path without taking right-of-way.

In general, roundabouts reduce collision conflict points and the tight circle of a roundabout forces drivers to slow down, and the most severe types of intersection crashes – right-angle, left-turn and head-on collisions are unlikely. Roundabouts improve traffic flow by reducing the need to stop. Pedestrian crossing distances are reduced to one lane making it safer for pedestrians while reducing the wait time for drivers before being able to proceed.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF THE SAN ANTONIO DRIVE PATH AND SAFE ROUTES

TO SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENTS
JANUARY 14, 2025
PAGE 4 OF 5
There still appear to be concerns by some in the public, but the majority of input has been feedback. Staff recommends adoption of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and approval of the project scope which are both necessary to meet the grant obligations.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no impact to the General Fund. The project will be paid for with a portion of the $11 million Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15074, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration (IS/ND) has been prepared for the San Antonio Drive Path and Safe Routes to Schools Project. The IS/ND is provided as Exhibit A to Draft Resolution provided as Attachment 1 recommending the adoption of a Negative Declaration for the San Antonio Drive Path & Safe Routes to Schools Improvements Project. The Initial Study/Negative Declaration document was available for public review between July 24, 2024, and ending on August 23, 2024.

Notification to responsible agencies for this meeting was completed via mailings to the State Clearinghouse, community and regional interest groups, noticed in The King City Rustler, and posted on the city's website. No comments were received during the 30-day public review period or in response to the legal notice that was published on July 24, 2024.

The Initial Study examined any potentially significant impacts based on CEQA thresholds of significance and concluded that there is no substantial evidence to suggest that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The following reasons support these findings:

1. The proposal is a logical component of the existing land use pattern and circulation system of this area.

2. Potentially adverse construction effects will be addressed by implementation of construction best practices and/or standard conditions of approval.

3. The project will yield beneficial impacts with respect to bicycle and pedestrian safety.

4. No significance thresholds under CEQA will be exceeded.

5. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals, policies and land uses of the City of King City General Plan and Municipal Code.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 1 of 24 ends

Intersection Control Evaluation
Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue in King City, CA

INTRODUCTION
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed for three intersections along Broadway Street in King City, California.
• Broadway Street at Franciscan Way (“Intersection 1” and “Franciscan Way intersection”) • Broadway Street at Canal Street (“Intersection 2” and “Canal Street intersection”) • Broadway Street at Mildred Avenue (“Intersection 3” and “Mildred Avenue intersection”) The Franciscan Way intersection is currently four-legged and operates as a side-street stop-control (SSSC).

The Canal Street intersection is currently three-legged and operates as a SSSC. The Mildred Avenue intersection is currently four-legged and operates as an all-way stop-control (AWSC). The Franciscan Way and Canal Street intersections have left-turn lanes along Broadway Street and an additional turn lane on the side-street. The Mildred Avenue intersection has left-turn lanes along Broadway Street and no additional turn lanes on the side-streets.

A proposed road diet along Broadway Street requires reconfiguration of the three study intersections. The road diet retains on-street parking on both sides of the road and adds a bi-directional Class IV bike path along the north side of the intersection and bulb-outs. The inclusion of the bike path and bulb-outs will require the removal of the two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) along Broadway Street between San Antonio Drive and Mildred Avenue. This will result in no additional turn lanes at the Franciscan Way and Canal Street intersections.

SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Five performance metrics were evaluated at the study intersection to calculate the Benefit Cost (B/C) Ratio which measures the expected return on investment for each proposed intersection control. The performance measures used to calculate the benefits between the proposed alternatives are:
• Safety Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) • Delay Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) • Emission Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) Performance measures used to calculate the conceptual level costs between the proposed alternatives are:
• Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) • Initial Capital Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) Refer to Appendix A for a detailed description of each performance measure and the Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table1 that were used in this B/C Analysis.

Analysis Design Year
Design year traffic scenarios were developed using the traffic volume counts taken on April 9th, 2024 to establish project baseline conditions and to evaluate the effectiveness of intersection control strategies at the study intersection. As directed by the City of King (the “City”) and TAMC, the weekday AM and PM peak-hour traffic analyses were completed for the following scenarios:
• Opening Year (2024) Conditions
1 Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table, Caltrans, January 2020.

EXHIBIT 1
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 2 of 24 ends

• Peak hour volumes from traffic counts
• Design Life (2044) Conditions
• The volume forecasts are based on an assumed linear growth rate of 1.172% determined by the future planned development taking place.

See Appendix B for the intersection traffic volumes and heavy vehicle percentages that were used for the intersection analysis.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 3 of 24 ends

FRANCISCAN WAY INTERSECTION
Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
Three intersection control alternatives were ultimately considered in the ICE Analysis for the intersection of Franciscan Way and Broadway Street. See Appendix C, Appendix D, and Appendix E for the operational analysis worksheets for each alternative. The preliminary concept layouts for each alternative based on the operational analyses are included in Appendix F.

The intersection of Franciscan Way and Broadway Street does not satisfy signal warrants per the 2014 MUTCD (Revision 6). Since signal warrants were not met, a proposed signal was not evaluated as an alternative for this intersection. See Appendix G for signal warrant analysis reports.

The following intersection control improvement alternatives were evaluated in this ICE Analysis:
• All Way Stop Control (AWSC)
• Side Street Stop Control (SSSC)
• Roundabout
Alternative A: All Way Stop Control
This alternative has stop-controlled single lane legs in all directions. The worst operations occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS of E and average delay of 36.7 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the EB approach with 275 feet, which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. See Table 1 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 1 below shows a concept layout of the AWSC alternative.

Table 1: Franciscan Way AWSC Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 C 19.7 0.752 175 (EB) C 16 0.642 125 (EB)
2044 C 17.1 0.700 150 (EB) E 36.7 0.894 275 (EB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 4 of 24 ends

Figure 1: Franciscan Way AWSC Concept Layout
Alternative B: Side Street Stop Control
This alternative includes a stop controlled single lane southern leg with a left and right turn lane while the EB/WB legs are uncontrolled. The worst operations occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS of F and average delay of 90.3 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the NB approach with 175 feet, which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. See Table 2 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 2 below shows a concept layout of the side street stop control alternative.

Table 2: Franciscan SSSC Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 C 21.2 0.205 25 (NB) D 28.2 0.485 75 (NB)
2044 C 19.5 0.176 25 (NB) F 90.3 0.909 175 (NB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 5 of 24 ends

Figure 2: Franciscan SSSW Concept Layout
Alternative C: Roundabout
This alternative includes a four-legged single-lane roundabout. The worst operations will occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS A and an average delay of 7.9 seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue length occurs on the EB approach at year 2044 and is 100 feet which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. Table 3 below includes a summary of the roundabout operations. Figure 3 below shows a concept layout of the proposed roundabout.

Table 3: Roundabout Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 A 6.5 0.459 100 (EB) A 6.3 0.358 50 (EB)
2044 A 6.2 0.431 75 (EB) A 7.9 0.471 100 (EB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 6 of 24 ends

Figure 3: Franciscan Way Roundabout Control Concept Layout

Performance Measure Summary
The following figures show the cost of key performance measures for each control types at the intersection of Franciscan Way and Broadway Street assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate life-cycle costs. Each intersection control type corresponds to the proposed alternatives discussed on pages 3, 4, and

5. Table 4 on page 7 summarizes the costs associated with each alternative.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 7 of 24 ends

Table 4: Performance Measure Summary

Benefit Performance Measure Summary
Safety Preferred Alternative:

Based on the lowest predicted life-cycle cost
for safety, the preferred intersection control
type for this intersection is a roundabout. See
Appendix H for the Interactive Highway
Safety Design Manual (IHSDM)’s KABCO
values used for the safety analysis.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 8 of 24 ends

Delay Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the lowest predicted lifecycle cost for delay, the preferred intersection control type for this
intersection is side street stop control.

Emissions
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the life-cycle cost for
emissions, the preferred intersection
control type for this intersection is side
street stop control.

Cost Performance Measure Summary
O&M
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected annual O&M
costs, the preferred intersection control type
for this intersection is either all way or side
street stop control.

B/C Analysis Summary
The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 5 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring:
⁄ Ratio Score
∑

∑

Table 5: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for side street stop control is equal to all way stop control/roundabout.

B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that side street stop control will provide a better ROI when compared to all way stop control/roundabout.

B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that all way stop control/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to side street stop control.

B/C = NA-R When the cost of all way stop control/roundabout is less than the cost of side street stop control and all way stop control/roundabout provides benefit over side street stop control, a B/C ratio cannot be computed. This special case is denoted by “NA-R” and indicates that all way stop control/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to side street stop control.

The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 4% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the five performance measures.

Note: ROI=Return of Investment
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 9 of 24 ends

The summary results of the B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 6. The B/C analysis is based on comparing the all way stop control and roundabout alternatives to the SSSC alternative.

The AWSC alternative has a negative B/C ratio because the AWSC alternative yeilds less benefits compared to the SSSC alternative while also having greater costs. The roundabout has a B/C ratio greater than 1.0, which indicates that it is the more cost-effective compared to the SSSC alternative.

Table 6: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – B/C Ratios

Figure 4 shows the accumulated cost of
all five performance measures for each
proposed alternative. This figure reflects
the B/C ratio results between each
alternative. The roundabout starts with a
larger accumulated cost because of the
greater initial capital cost, but because of
the greater societal costs of the AWSC
and SSSC alternatives, the roundabout
provides a greater return on investment
after 2027. The roundabout is the
preferred intersection control type for
the entire 20-year analysis time period.

Figure 4: Accumulated Costs Between Proposed Alternatives ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 10 of 24 ends

CANAL STREET INTERSECTION
Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
Three intersection control alternatives were ultimately considered in the ICE Analysis for the intersection of Canal Street and Broadway Street. See Appendix C, Appendix D, and Appendix E for the operational analysis worksheets for each alternative. The preliminary concept layouts for each alternative based on the operational analyses are included in Appendix F.

The intersection of Canal Street and Broadway Street does not satisfy signal warrants per the 2014 MUTCD (Revision 6). Since signal warrants were not met, a proposed signal was not evaluated as an alternative for this intersection. See Appendix G for signal warrant analysis reports.

The following intersection control improvement alternatives were evaluated in this ICE Analysis:
• All Way Stop Control (AWSC)
• Side Street Stop Control (SSSC)
• Roundabout
Alternative A: All Way Stop Control
This alternative has stop controlled single lane legs in all directions. The worst operations occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS of F and average delay of 53.1 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the WB approach with 350 feet, which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. See Table 7 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 5 below shows a concept layout of the AWSC alternative.

Table 7: Canal Street AWSC Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 B 10.6 0.399 50 (WB) C 20.8 0.724 150 (WB)
2044 B 12.6 0.512 75 (WB) F 53.1 0.971 350 (WB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 11 of 24 ends

Figure 5: Canal Street AWSC Concept Layout
Alternative B: Side Street Stop Control
This alternative includes a stop controlled single lane southern leg with a left and right turn lane while the EB/WB legs are uncontrolled. The worst operations occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS of E and average delay of 47.3 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the NB approach with 150 feet, which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. See Table 8 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 6 below shows a concept layout of the SSSC alternative.

Table 8: Canal Street SSSC Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 B 13.6 0.205 25 (NB) C 22.1 0.456 50 (NB)
2044 C 16 0.289 25 (NB) E 47.3 0.750 150 (NB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 12 of 24 ends

Figure 6: Canal Street SSSC Concept Layout
Alternative C: Roundabout
This alternative includes a three legged single-lane roundabout. The worst operations will occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS A and an average delay of 7.7 seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue length occurs on the WB approach at year 2044 and is 100 feet which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. Table 9 below includes a summary of the roundabout operations. Figure 7 below shows a concept layout of the proposed roundabout.

Table 9: Roundabout Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 A 4.8 0.237 25 (EB) A 6.3 0.398 50 (EB)
2044 A 5.1 0.294 50 (EB) A 7.7 0.497 100 (WB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 13 of 24 ends

Figure 7: Canal Street Roundabout Control Concept Layout

Performance Measure Summary
The following figures show the cost of key performance measures for each control types at the intersection of Canal Street and Broadway Street assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate life-cycle costs. Each intersection control type corresponds to the proposed alternatives discussed on pages 10, 11, and 12. Table 10 on page 14 summarizes the costs associated with each alternative.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 14 of 24 ends

Table 10: Performance Measure Summary

Benefit Performance Measure Summary
Safety Preferred Alternative:

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 15 of 24 ends

Delay Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the lowest predicted lifecycle cost for delay, the preferred intersection control type for this
intersection is side street stop control.

Emissions
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the life-cycle cost for
emissions, the preferred intersection
control type for this intersection is side
street stop control.

Cost Performance Measure Summary
O&M
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected annual O&M
costs, the preferred intersection control type
for this intersection is either side street or all
way stop control.

B/C Analysis Summary
The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 11 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring:
⁄ Ratio Score
∑

∑

Table 11: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for side street stop control is equal to all way stop control/roundabout.

B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that side street stop control will provide a better ROI when compared to all way stop control/roundabout.

B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that all way stop control/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to side street stop control.

The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 4% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the five performance measures.

Note: ROI=Return of Investment
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 16 of 24 ends

The summary results of the B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 12. The B/C analysis is based on comparing the AWSC and roundabout alternatives to the SSSC alternative. The AWSC alternative has a negative B/C because the AWSC yeilds less benefits compared to the SSSC alternative while also having larger costs. The roundabout has a B/C ratios greater than 1.0, which indicates that it is the most cost-effective intersection control type compared to the existing signal.

Table 12: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – B/C Ratios

Figure 8 shows the accumulated cost of
all five performance measures for each
proposed alternative. This figure reflects
the B/C ratio results between each
alternative. The roundabout starts with a
larger accumulated cost because of the
greater initial capital cost, but because of
the greater societal costs of the AWSC
and SSSC alternatives, the roundabout
provides a greater return on investment
after 2039. The roundabout is the
preferred intersection control type for
the entire 20-year analysis time period.

Figure 8: Accumulated Costs Between Proposed Alternatives ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 17 of 24 ends

MILDRED AVENUE INTERSECTION
Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
Two intersection control alternatives were ultimately considered in the ICE Analysis for the intersection of Mildred Avenue and Broadway Street. See Appendix E and Appendix I for the operational analysis worksheets for each alternative. The preliminary concept layouts for each alternative based on the operational analyses are included in Appendix F.

The intersection of Mildred Avenue and Broadway Street satisfied signal warrants per the 2014 MUTCD (Revision 6). Since signal warrants were met, a proposed signal was evaluated as an alternative for this intersection. See Appendix G for signal warrant analysis reports.

The following intersection control improvement alternatives were evaluated in this ICE Analysis:
• Proposed Signal Control
• Roundabout
Alternative A: Proposed Signal Control
This alternative has signal controlled single lane legs in all directions. The worst operations occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS of E and average delay of 61.0 seconds. The max 95th percentile queue length is the WB approach with 400 feet, which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. See Table 13 below for the summary of Alternative A analysis. Figure 9 below shows a concept layout of the proposed traffic signal.

Table 13: Signal Control Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 C 33.5 0.730 150 (EB) C 28.3 0.770 325 (WB)
2044 E 55.7 0.930 175 (EB) E 61.0 0.860 400 (WB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 18 of 24 ends

Figure 9: Mildred Ave Signal Concept Layout
Alternative C: Roundabout
This alternative includes a four legged single-lane roundabout. The worst operations will occur during the 2044 PM peak hour with a LOS A and an average delay of 9.8 seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue length occurs on the EB approach at year 2044 and is 100 feet which doesn’t conflict with the adjacent intersection. Table 14 below includes a summary of the roundabout operations. Figure 10 below shows a concept layout of the proposed roundabout.

Table 14: Roundabout Operations
AM PM
Design
Year
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS
Delay
(s)
v/c
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2024 A 5.4 0.265 25 (EB) A 7.5 0.443 75 (EB)
2044 A 6.5 0.336 50 (EB) A 9.8 0.565 100 (EB)
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 19 of 24 ends

Figure 10: Mildred Ave Roundabout Control Concept Layout

Performance Measure Summary
The following figures show the cost of key performance measures for each control types at the intersection of Mildred Ave and Broadway Street assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate life-cycle costs. Each intersection control type corresponds to the proposed alternatives discussed on pages 17 and

18. Table 15 on page 20 summarizes the costs associated with each alternative.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 20 of 24 ends

Table 15: Performance Measure Summary

Benefit Performance Measure Summary
Safety Preferred Alternative:

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 21 of 24 ends

Delay Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the lowest predicted lifecycle cost for delay, the preferred intersection control type for this
intersection is a roundabout.

Emissions
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on the life-cycle cost for
emissions, the preferred intersection
control type for this intersection is signal
controlled.

Cost Performance Measure Summary
O&M
Preferred Alternative:

Based solely on lowest expected annual O&M
costs, the preferred intersection control type
for this intersection is a roundabout.

B/C Analysis Summary
The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 16 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring:
⁄ Ratio Score
∑

∑

Table 16: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for the proposed signal is equal to a roundabout.

B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that the proposed signal will provide a better ROI when compared to a roundabout.

B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that a roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the proposed signal.

B/C = NA-R When the cost of a roundabout is less than the cost of the proposed signal and a roundabout provides benefit over the proposed signal, a B/C ratio cannot be computed. This special case is denoted by “NA-R” and indicates that a roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the proposed signal.

The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 4% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the five performance measures.

Note: ROI=Return of Investment
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 22 of 24 ends

The summary results of the B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 17. The B/C analysis is based on comparing the proposed signal to the a roundabout. The B/C ratio for the roundabout is defined as ‘NA-R’ because the roundabout provides more benefits than the signal, while also having less costs. Since the roundabout has lower costs and a higher benefits compared to the proposed signal, a roundabout would be the most cost-effective intersection control type.

Table 17: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – B/C Ratios

Figure 11 shows the accumulated cost of
all five performance measures for both
proposed alternatives. This figure reflects
the B/C ratio results between both
alternatives. The roundabout starts with a
lower accumulated cost, and due to the
greater societal costs of the proposed
signal, the roundabout provides a greater
return on investment throughout the
design life. A roundabout is the preferred
intersection control type for the entire
20-year analysis time period.

Figure 11: Accumulated Costs Between Proposed Alternatives

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 23 of 24 ends

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An analysis of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures for the Franciscan Way intersection indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative. • The intersection type that provides the most safety benefit for this intersection is a roundabout which has the lowest life cycle cost of $1,189,335.
• The intersection type that provides that most delay benefit is the side street stop-controlled alternative which has the lowest life cycle cost of $278,938. • The intersection type that provides the most operations and maintenance benefit is either the side street stop controlled, or all way stop controlled alternative which have the lowest life cycle cost of $9,354.
• The intersection type that provides that most emissions benefit is the side street stop-controlled alternative which has the lowest life cycle cost of $47,214. • The side street stop-controlled alternative has the lowest initial capital cost of $1,000,000. • The B/C ratios for the intersection are -98.85 and 5.18 respectively, when the all way stop control and roundabout are compared to the side street stop control alternative. Since the B/C ratio of the roundabout is greater than 1.0, the roundabout the most cost-effective.

An analysis of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures for the Canal Street intersection indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative. • The intersection type that provides the most safety benefit for this intersection is a roundabout which has the lowest life cycle cost of $1,086,327.
• The intersection type that provides that most delay benefit is the side street stop-controlled alternative which has the lowest life cycle cost of $250,170. • The intersection type that provides the most operations and maintenance benefit is either the side street stop controlled, or all way stop controlled alternative which have the lowest life cycle cost of $9,354.
• The intersection type that provides that most emissions benefit is the side street stop-controlled alternative which has the lowest life cycle cost of $43,056. • The side street stop-controlled alternative has the lowest initial capital cost of $1,000,000. • The B/C ratios for the intersection are -650.55 and 1.84 respectively, when the all way stop control and roundabout are compared to the side street stop control alternative. Since the B/C ratio of the roundabout is greater than 1.0, the roundabout the most cost-effective.

An analysis of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures for the Mildred Avenue intersection indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative. • The intersection type that provides the most safety benefit for this intersection is a roundabout which has the lowest life cycle cost of $1,436,895.
• The intersection type that provides that most delay benefit is a roundabout which has the lowest life cycle cost of $447,060.
• The intersection type that provides the most operations and maintenance benefit a roundabout which has the lowest life cycle cost of $18,708.
• The intersection type that provides that most emissions benefit is the proposed signal alternative which has the lowest life cycle cost of $92,138.
• The proposed signal alternative has the lowest initial capital cost of $1,150,000.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue

Page 24 of 24 ends

• The B/C ratio for the roundabout is NA-R when compared to the proposed signal alternative, which means that the costs of the roundabout are lower while the benefits are higher compared to the proposed signal. Since the costs are lower and the benefits provided by the roundabout are greater than the proposed signal, the roundabout the most cost-effective.

The most noteworthy performance measure driving the B/C Ratios is safety. Since the costs associated with safety are so much higher compared to the other metrics, safety costs contribute more to the B/C ratio.

Appendix
Appendix A – Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table
Appendix B – Traffic Volumes
Appendix C – Side Street Stop Control Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix D – All Way Stop Control Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix E – Roundabout SIDRA Operational Analysis
Appendix F – Preliminary Concept Layouts for Side Street Stop Control, All Way Stop Control, Proposed Signal, and Roundabout
Appendix G – Signal Warrants
Appendix H – HSM Predictive Method Safety Analysis IHSDM KABCO Values Appendix I – Proposed Traffic Signal Control Synchro Operational Analysis Appendix J – Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Ratio Worksheet
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix A
Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2020 Value Comparison Table
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024

BACKGROUND ON BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS
The ICE Analysis is based on the results of a B/C analysis, which is an objective, data-driven calculation that helps inform investment decisions when stakeholders are evaluating intersection control improvements.

The calculations identify cost effective improvements considering the full lifecycle of the improvement, typically 20 years.

Five performance metrics are typically evaluated for proposed conceptual control types at each study location to determine the B/C ratio. The metrics include:
• Safety – measuring the societal cost associated with the predicted number and severity of collisions.
• Delay – measuring the societal cost associated with the number of person-hours of delay. • Emissions – measuring the societal cost associated with the exposure to health-based pollutants emitted by motor vehicles.
• Operations and Maintenance – measuring common annualized costs associated with operating and maintaining the intersection control.
• Initial Capital Costs – measuring the capital costs needed to plan, design, and construct the intersection improvement. The capital costs include construction, capital support, and right of way.

Benefit Performance Measures
The following performance measures are used to calculate the benefit, or cost savings, of the proposed intersection control improvement compared to the existing condition. For each performance measure, the proposed improvement provides a benefit if the calculated life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement is less than the life-cycle cost of the existing condition. The magnitude of the benefit is the difference between the life-cycle cost of the existing condition less the life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement.

Safety
Safety measures the societal cost associated with the predicted number and severity of collisions that may occur for the existing and each proposed intersection control type. The number of predicted collisions was calculated using Highway Safety Manual predictive methods and crash modification factors (CMF). Since CMFs and Safety Performance Functions (SPF) are statistical models based on historical crash data, the safety cost is only a prediction of crash severity distribution and does not perfectly represent the future crash data.

Delay
Delay measures the societal cost associated with the number of person-hours of delay at the intersection during the study period. Consistent with the Caltrans Vehicle Operation Cost Parameters 2020, vehicle occupancy of 1.15 is used to convert delay to person-hours of delay at a value of $19.70 per vehicle-hour of delay, which is the weighted-average of automobile and truck.

Emissions
The emissions performance measure calculates the societal cost associated with exposure to health-based pollutants emitted by motor vehicles. Pollutant emissions are running emissions based on the average speed of vehicles traveling through the intersection during the study period. Pollutant emissions evaluated include reactive organic gasses (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM10). The societal cost of emissions is calculated using emission data from the California Air Resource Board (CARB) Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects, Table 4 Emission Factors by Speed, ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
September 2019 and cost per ton data from Caltrans Vehicle Operation Cost Parameters 2020 for emissions (Note: VOC is assumed to be synonymous with ROG).

Cost Performance Measures
The following performance measures are used to calculate the added cost of the proposed intersection control improvements compared to the existing control. For each performance measure, the proposed improvements add to the cost of the intersection if the calculated life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement is greater than the life-cycle cost of existing condition. The magnitude of the cost is the difference between the life-cycle cost of the proposed improvement less the life-cycle cost of the existing condition.

Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
The operations and maintenance performance measure incorporate common annualized costs associated with operating and maintaining the proposed type of intersection control. Common costs include signal timing and maintenance, power consumption for signal operations and intersection illumination, landscape maintenance, and pavement rehabilitation. Average annualized costs were used.

Initial Capital Costs
The initial capital costs performance measure estimates the capital costs needed to plan, design, and construct the proposed intersection improvement. The capital costs include construction, capital support, and right of way.

As described in the United States Department of Transportation’s Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs (Jan. 2020 , p. 6), a blend of “localized data with national estimates or industry standards to complete a more robust analysis” can be applied. The default parameters for the 2020 INFRA Cal-B/C tool are a blend of California and national values assessed at a 2018 base year.

Users should revise default parameters if more applicable values exist for a project being assessed. Revisions can be made within the “Parameters” tab of the Excel workbook by entering a new value into the individual cell. In addition, assumptions identified in the “Project Information” tab (red or blue cells) can be adjusted based for a specific project, e.g., average vehicle occupancy, percent truck, roadway type, etc. The table below is a comparison of California and national values—assumed 2020 INFRA Cal-B/C values are highlighted in yellow.

Parameters Cal-B/C Values Fed. Values Notes
Current Dollar Value applied
in tool 2018 2018
All assumed Cal-B/C parameters are adjusted for 2018 dollars.

Assumed Cal-B/C values in the model have been escalated to 2018 dollars, as recommended in the guidance.

Real Discount Rate 4.00% 7.00% A sensitivity analysis of 3% is no longer required.

Average Vehicle Occupancy

1.67 Cal-B/C factors in peak and non-peak average vehicle occupancy, whereas the federal guidance uses a single AVO figure. Thus, the default values apply to California statewide average.

Non-peak – 1.3
Peak – 1.15
Period of analysis Construction, plus 20
years after completion.

Construction, plus 20 years
after completion in most
situations.

Federal guidance suggests applying no more than 30 years for analytical purposes after project completion.

Travel Time Parameters
Statewide Average Hourly
Wage ($/hr.) $28.44 California values extracted from BLS data.

Heavy and Light Truck
Drivers Average Hourly
Wage ($/hr.)
$21.20 California values extracted from BLS data.

Heavy and Light Truck
Drivers Benefits and Costs
($/hr.)
$11.08 California values extracted from BLS data.

Automobile/Personal
($/hr./per) $14.20 $15.20
For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38.

Link : https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Truck/Business ($/hr./veh.) $32.30 $29.50
For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Auto & Truck
Composite/All Purpose
($/hr./veh)
$19.70 $25.55
Federal weighted average based on a typical distribution of local travel by surface modes (95.4% personal, 4.6% truck). California assumes a different distribution (91% personal, 9% truck). Applicants should apply their own distribution of business versus personal travel if available.

Transit/Transit Rail
Operators ($/hr./per) $14.20 (passenger)
$15.20 (local personal
travel) Cal-B/C only values “transit” per passenger. Federal guidance states, for wait times, the value should be doubled. Values for personal travel based on local travel values and intercity personal travel are described in US DOT’s Value of Travel Time guidance. A valuation of the “transit operator” is also not a factor in the Cal-B/C model.
$21.30 (intercity personal
travel)
$50.20 (transit rail
operator)
Average Fuel Price
Automobile (regular
unleaded) ($/gal) $3.31
Fuel prices for gasoline and diesel were extracted the US Energy Information Administration's 2018 Petroleum and Other Liquids annual report.

For calculation methodology, see Cal-B/C tech doc. (Volume 4), pp. II-37 to II-38. pp. II-37 to II-46.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
Truck (diesel) ($/gal.) $3.44
Fuel prices for gasoline and diesel were extracted the US Energy Information Administration's 2017 Petroleum and Other Liquids annual report.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0009451- cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf
State Sales Tax (gasoline) 2.25% Value is applicable to California.

State Sales Tax (diesel) 13.00% Value is applicable to California.

Average Local Sales Tax 0.50% Value is applicable to California.

Federal Fuel Excise Tax
(gasoline) ($/gal.) $0.184
Federal Fuel Excise Tax
(diesel) ($/gal.) $0.244
State Fuel Excise Tax
(gasoline) ($/gal.) $0.417 Value is applicable to California (current rate increased on 7/19 to $0.473)
State Fuel Excise Tax
(diesel) ($/gal.) $0.36 Value is applicable to California (reflective of Nov. 2017 SB-1 increase) Non-Fuel Cost Per Mile
Automobile $0.326
Federal guidance does not provide an estimate. Non-fuel costs are based on 2016 Cal-B/C estimate and escalated to 2018 using OMB Table

10.1 GDP. Cal-B/C auto value assessed at 3.13 cents (2016) and base value for truck is ATRI (2014) value.

Truck/Light Duty Vehicles $0.434 $0.41
Cal-B/C breaks out fuel and non-fuel costs. US DOT Guidance factors in fuel costs when estimating vehicle operation costs. Truck was escalated using 2018 divided by 2014 indices, as the base year in the model was 2016.

Commercial Trucks $0.96
Cal-B/C breaks out fuel and non-fuel costs for commercial trucks. US DOT Guidance factors in fuel costs, repair, insurance, permits, license, etc.

Accident Cost Parameters
Cost of Fatality/Killed $9.8M $9.6M
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level A (Severe)/Incapacitating $467,000 $459,100
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level B (Moderate)/Nonincapacitating $127,100 $125,000 Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Level (Minor)/Possible Injury $65,000 $63,900
Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Cost of Property Damage (PDO) $4,374 $4,400 Accident costs are based on reported federal benefit-cost guidance rate for 2018. The assumed rate in the 2016 Cal-B/C model differs.

Pollutant Emissions
CO $75 - $160 $0
Cal-B/C estimates are based on Corporate Average Fuel Economy for MY2017-MY2025 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (August 2012), page 922, Table VIII-16, “Economic Values Used for Benefits Computations (2010 dollars)”. Values are inflated from 2010 dollars to 2016 dollars using the GDP deflator. Cal-B/C rates vary depending on project location. Cal-B/C calculation methodology can be viewed in its tech. doc. vol. 4, pp. II-51 to II-61. Cal-B/C value differs based on geographic three regional categories within California.

Link: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportationplanning/documents/f0009451-cal-bctechsupplementvol4v4-a11y.pdf No value identified in the federal guidance document, thus, no value assessed.

CO2 $38 $0.91
USDOT recommends using a monetary value of $1 per metric ton (2018) for the social cost of carbon based on the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021- 2026 report. However, Cal-B/C’s CO2 unit of measurement is in short ton. Thus, the conversion value is $1 per metric divided by 1.1023 short ton equals $0.91.

NOX
$13,900 –
$63,900 $8,600 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

PM10
$107,700 –
$523,300 $387,300 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

SO2
$54,400 –
$196,600 $50,100 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

VOC $1,025 –
$3,970 $2,100 Cal-B/C value differs based on three regional categories within California.Applied the 2018 federal rate.

ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix B
Traffic Volumes

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-080074-001 Day:

City: King City Date:

AM 3 0 2 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
1 383 0 240
0 0 0 0 0 30 0 15
3 0 1 0 TEV 727 0 999 0 0 0 0
370 0 388 1 PHF 0.64 0.94
51 0 61 0
0 1 0 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 93 0 43 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 25 0 14 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 1
Franciscan Way & Broadway St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Franciscan Way Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 4/9/2024

PEAK HOURS
2:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 7 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
431 0 386
Totals (AM) 91 Total Bikes (AM)
Broadway St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Broadway St
268 0 476

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 66

NORTHBOUND
Franciscan Way
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
1 2
0 0
20 310
5 3
0 2
2 0
6 50
10 30 14
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 1
000
001
1 383
61 30
388
1 000
93043
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
4 240
51 15
370
3 302
25014
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-080074-002 Day:

City: King City Date:

AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 382 0 216
0 0 0 0 1 91 0 75
0 0 0 0 TEV 647 0 1055 0 0 0 0
220 0 358 1 PHF 0.92 0.92
37 0 64 0
0 1 0 1

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 42 0 118 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 14 0 85 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0
Canal St & Broadway St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Canal St Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 4/9/2024

PEAK HOURS
2:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
476 0 305
Totals (AM) 155 Total Bikes (AM)
Broadway St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Broadway St
230 0 424

CONTROL
1-Way Stop(NB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 112

NORTHBOUND
Canal St
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
34 0
28 14
0 185
130 5520
15 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 00 0
0 1
0 1
1 0
000
002
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1
0 0
1 0
000
000
0 382
64 91
358
0 000
420118
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 216
37 75
220
0 000
14085
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 24-080074-003 Day:

City: King City Date:

AM 124 41 39 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 160 40 57 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 54 0 47
1 293 0 151
0 0 0 0 1 29 0 9
103 0 151 1 TEV 828 0 1218 0 0 0 0
169 0 307 1 PHF 0.89 0.93
15 0 26 0
0 0 1 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 23 53 25 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 34 72 24 AM
0 NONE
03:45 PM - 04:45 PM 258
Mildred Ave & Broadway St
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Mildred Ave Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 4/9/2024

PEAK HOURS
2:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 222 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
389 0 232
Totals (AM) 95 Total Bikes (AM)
Broadway St

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Broadway St
309 0 476

CONTROL
4-Way Stop
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 65

NORTHBOUND
Mildred Ave
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
11 0
1 5
0 56
170 050
10 12
0 42
8 0
0 70
16 1250 22
0 2
0 1
3 1
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 2
0 0
0 1
000
100
54 293
26 29
307
151
1604057
235325
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
47 151
15 9
169
103
1244139
347224
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix C
Side Street Stop Control Synchro Operational Analysis

King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 370 51 15 240 4 25 1 14 2 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 3 370 51 15 240 4 25 1 14 2 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 13 0 4 4 0 13 1 0 8 8 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 529 73 21 343 6 36 1 20 3 0 6
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 362 0 0 606 0 0 970 982 578 993 1015 360 Stage 1 - - - - - - 578 578 - 401 401 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 392 404 - 592 614 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1197 - - 972 - - 233 249 516 224 238 684 Stage 1 - - - - - - 501 501 - 626 601 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 633 599 - 493 483 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1184 - - 969 - - 224 238 511 205 227 676 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 224 238 - 205 227 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 497 497 - 616 578 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 610 576 - 467 479 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.5 21.2 14.6

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 279 1184 - - 969 - - 383
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.205 0.004 - - 0.022 - - 0.022
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 21.2 8.1 0 - 8.8 0 - 14.6
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 388 61 30 383 1 93 0 43 0 1 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 388 61 30 383 1 93 0 43 0 1 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 19 0 7 7 0 19 2 0 5 5 0 2
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 408 64 32 403 1 98 0 45 0 1 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 423 0 0 479 0 0 924 940 452 961 972 425 Stage 1 - - - - - - 453 453 - 487 487 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 487 - 474 485 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1136 - - 1083 - - 250 264 608 236 252 629 Stage 1 - - - - - - 586 570 - 562 550 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 573 550 - 571 552 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1118 - - 1077 - - 239 247 602 207 236 618 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 239 247 - 207 236 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 580 564 - 551 521 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 547 521 - 524 546 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.6 28.2 14

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 295 1118 - - 1077 - - 401
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.485 0.003 - - 0.029 - - 0.008
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 28.2 8.2 0 - 8.4 0 - 14
HCM Lane LOS D A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 2.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 457 63 19 296 5 31 1 17 2 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 4 457 63 19 296 5 31 1 17 2 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 13 0 4 4 0 13 1 0 8 8 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 497 68 21 322 5 34 1 18 2 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 340 0 0 569 0 0 913 925 543 937 957 339 Stage 1 - - - - - - 543 543 - 380 380 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 370 382 - 557 577 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1219 - - 1003 - - 254 269 540 245 258 703 Stage 1 - - - - - - 524 520 - 642 614 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 650 613 - 515 502 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1206 - - 1000 - - 245 257 535 226 247 695 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 245 257 - 226 247 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 516 - 632 591 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 628 590 - 490 498 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.5 19.5 13.4

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 302 1206 - - 1000 - - 436
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.004 - - 0.021 - - 0.017
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 19.5 8 0 - 8.7 0 - 13.4
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 479 75 37 473 1 115 0 53 0 1 2
Future Vol, veh/h 4 479 75 37 473 1 115 0 53 0 1 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 19 0 7 7 0 19 2 0 5 5 0 2
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 521 82 40 514 1 125 0 58 0 1 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 534 0 0 610 0 0 1175 1191 574 1218 1232 536 Stage 1 - - - - - - 577 577 - 614 614 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 598 614 - 604 618 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1034 - - 969 - - 168 187 518 157 177 545 Stage 1 - - - - - - 502 502 - 479 483 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 489 483 - 485 481 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1018 - - 963 - - 157 171 513 130 162 535 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 157 171 - 130 162 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 496 496 - 468 448 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 457 448 - 426 475 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.6 90.3 17

HCM LOS F C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 201 1018 - - 963 - - 303
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.909 0.004 - - 0.042 - - 0.011
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 90.3 8.6 0 - 8.9 0 - 17
HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 7.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 220 37 75 216 14 85
Future Vol, veh/h 220 37 75 216 14 85
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 57 57 0 213 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 239 40 82 235 15 92
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 336 0 928 316
Stage 1 - - - - 316 -
Stage 2 - - - - 612 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1223 - 297 724
Stage 1 - - - - 739 -
Stage 2 - - - - 541 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1165 - 214 690
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 214 -
Stage 1 - - - - 704 -
Stage 2 - - - - 409 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 2.1 13.6

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 525 - - 1165 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.205 - - 0.07 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.6 - - 8.3 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.8 - - 0.2 -
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 358 64 91 382 42 118
Future Vol, veh/h 358 64 91 382 42 118
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 28 28 0 48 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 389 70 99 415 46 128
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 487 0 1113 452
Stage 1 - - - - 452 -
Stage 2 - - - - 661 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1076 - 231 608
Stage 1 - - - - 641 -
Stage 2 - - - - 514 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1051 - 190 594
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 190 -
Stage 1 - - - - 626 -
Stage 2 - - - - 433 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 1.7 22.1

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 381 - - 1051 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.456 - - 0.094 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 22.1 - - 8.8 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 2.3 - - 0.3 -
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 272 46 93 267 17 105
Future Vol, veh/h 272 46 93 267 17 105
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 57 57 0 213 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 296 50 101 290 18 114
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 403 0 1083 378
Stage 1 - - - - 378 -
Stage 2 - - - - 705 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1156 - 240 669
Stage 1 - - - - 693 -
Stage 2 - - - - 490 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1101 - 168 637
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 168 -
Stage 1 - - - - 660 -
Stage 2 - - - - 359 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 2.2 16

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 459 - - 1101 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.289 - - 0.092 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 16 - - 8.6 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 1.2 - - 0.3 -
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 442 79 112 472 52 146
Future Vol, veh/h 442 79 112 472 52 146
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 28 28 0 48 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 480 86 122 513 57 159
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 594 0 1356 551
Stage 1 - - - - 551 -
Stage 2 - - - - 805 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 982 - 165 534
Stage 1 - - - - 577 -
Stage 2 - - - - 440 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 959 - 127 522
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 127 -
Stage 1 - - - - 564 -
Stage 2 - - - - 347 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 1.8 47.3

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 287 - - 959 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.75 - - 0.127 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 47.3 - - 9.3 0
HCM Lane LOS E - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 5.6 - - 0.4 -
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix D
All Way Stop Control Synchro Operational Analysis

King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 370 51 15 240 4 25 1 14 2 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 3 370 51 15 240 4 25 1 14 2 0 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 529 73 21 343 6 36 1 20 3 0 6
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.7 12.3 9.7 9

HCM LOS C B A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 63% 1% 6% 33%
Vol Thru, % 3% 87% 93% 0%
Vol Right, % 35% 12% 2% 67%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 40 424 259 6
LT Vol 25 3 15 2
Through Vol 1 370 240 0
RT Vol 14 51 4 4
Lane Flow Rate 57 606 370 9
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.094 0.751 0.489 0.014
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.953 4.461 4.756 5.933
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 596 806 755 607
Service Time 4.049 2.504 2.809 3.933
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 0.752 0.49 0.015
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.7 19.7 12.3 9
HCM Lane LOS A C B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 7.1 2.7 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 388 61 30 383 1 93 0 43 0 1 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 388 61 30 383 1 93 0 43 0 1 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 408 64 32 403 1 98 0 45 0 1 2
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 16 15.5 11 9.1

HCM LOS C C B A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 68% 1% 7% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 86% 93% 33%
Vol Right, % 32% 13% 0% 67%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 136 452 414 3
LT Vol 93 3 30 0
Through Vol 0 388 383 1
RT Vol 43 61 1 2
Lane Flow Rate 143 476 436 3
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.24 0.634 0.608 0.005
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.039 4.905 5.023 6.082
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 597 742 723 589
Service Time 4.058 2.905 3.023 4.112
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.24 0.642 0.603 0.005
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11 16 15.5 9.1
HCM Lane LOS B C C A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 4.6 4.2 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.7
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 457 63 19 296 5 31 1 17 2 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 4 457 63 19 296 5 31 1 17 2 0 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 497 68 21 322 5 34 1 18 2 0 5
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 17.1 11.6 9.5 8.8

HCM LOS C B A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 63% 1% 6% 29%
Vol Thru, % 2% 87% 93% 0%
Vol Right, % 35% 12% 2% 71%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 49 524 320 7
LT Vol 31 4 19 2
Through Vol 1 457 296 0
RT Vol 17 63 5 5
Lane Flow Rate 53 570 348 8
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.086 0.699 0.454 0.012
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.829 4.416 4.697 5.642
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 610 814 765 627
Service Time 3.912 2.452 2.741 3.738
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.7 0.455 0.013
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.5 17.1 11.6 8.8
HCM Lane LOS A C B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 5.8 2.4 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
3: Franciscan Way/Driveway & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 31
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 479 75 37 473 1 115 0 53 0 1 2
Future Vol, veh/h 4 479 75 37 473 1 115 0 53 0 1 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 521 82 40 514 1 125 0 58 0 1 2
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 36.7 30.7 13.2 10.2

HCM LOS E D B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 68% 1% 7% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 86% 93% 33%
Vol Right, % 32% 13% 0% 67%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 168 558 511 3
LT Vol 115 4 37 0
Through Vol 0 479 473 1
RT Vol 53 75 1 2
Lane Flow Rate 183 607 555 3
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.34 0.894 0.841 0.007
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.701 5.305 5.45 7.189
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 533 679 661 501
Service Time 4.779 3.362 3.508 5.189
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.343 0.894 0.84 0.006
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.2 36.7 30.7 10.2
HCM Lane LOS B E D B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 11.2 9.3 0
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 220 37 75 216 14 85
Future Vol, veh/h 220 37 75 216 14 85
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 239 40 82 235 15 92
Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.8 10.6 8.6

HCM LOS A B A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1
Vol Left, % 14% 0% 26%
Vol Thru, % 0% 86% 74%
Vol Right, % 86% 14% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 99 257 291
LT Vol 14 0 75
Through Vol 0 220 216
RT Vol 85 37 0
Lane Flow Rate 108 279 316
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.142 0.345 0.399
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.757 4.451 4.541
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 751 807 791
Service Time 2.801 2.484 2.574
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 0.346 0.399
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.6 9.8 10.6
HCM Lane LOS A A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1.5 1.9
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.8
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 358 64 91 382 42 118
Future Vol, veh/h 358 64 91 382 42 118
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 389 70 99 415 46 128
Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 16.9 20.8 11.2

HCM LOS C C B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1
Vol Left, % 26% 0% 19%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 81%
Vol Right, % 74% 15% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 160 422 473
LT Vol 42 0 91
Through Vol 0 358 382
RT Vol 118 64 0
Lane Flow Rate 174 459 514
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.283 0.645 0.731
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.855 5.065 5.117
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 612 711 710
Service Time 3.901 3.097 3.146
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.284 0.646 0.724
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.2 16.9 20.8
HCM Lane LOS B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 4.7 6.4
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.6
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 272 46 93 267 17 105
Future Vol, veh/h 272 46 93 267 17 105
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 296 50 101 290 18 114
Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.4 12.6 9.3

HCM LOS B B A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1
Vol Left, % 14% 0% 26%
Vol Thru, % 0% 86% 74%
Vol Right, % 86% 14% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 122 318 360
LT Vol 17 0 93
Through Vol 0 272 267
RT Vol 105 46 0
Lane Flow Rate 133 346 391
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.187 0.444 0.511
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.074 4.626 4.705
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 702 774 763
Service Time 3.149 2.682 2.76
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.189 0.447 0.512
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.3 11.4 12.6
HCM Lane LOS A B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 2.3 2.9
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
9: Canal St & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 39.4
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 442 79 112 472 52 146
Future Vol, veh/h 442 79 112 472 52 146
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 480 86 122 513 57 159
Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 33.9 53.1 13.6

HCM LOS D F B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1
Vol Left, % 26% 0% 19%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 81%
Vol Right, % 74% 15% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 198 521 584
LT Vol 52 0 112
Through Vol 0 442 472
RT Vol 146 79 0
Lane Flow Rate 215 566 635
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.386 0.866 0.976
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.464 5.508 5.534
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 553 651 654
Service Time 4.554 3.577 3.598
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.389 0.869 0.971
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.6 33.9 53.1
HCM Lane LOS B D F
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.8 10 14.4
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix E
Roundabout SIDRA Operational Analysis

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2024 AM Existing Alt00 (Site Folder: Franciscan)] Broadway St at Franciscan Way
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Franciscan Way
Lane 1d 57 2.0 830 0.069 100 5.0 LOS A 0.2 6.2 Full 950 0.0 0.0 Approach 57 2.0 0.069 5.0 LOS A 0.2 6.2
East: WB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 370 2.0 1296 0.286 100 5.1 LOS A 1.6 40.3 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 370 2.0 0.286 5.1 LOS A 1.6 40.3
North: SB_Driveway
Lane 1d 10 2.0 884 0.011 100 4.2 LOS A 0.0 1.1 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 10 2.0 0.011 4.2 LOS A 0.0 1.1
West: EB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 606 2.0 1318 0.459 100 6.5 LOS A 3.4 86.6 Full 750 0.0 0.0 Approach 606 2.0 0.459 6.5 LOS A 3.4 86.6
Intersectio
n
1043 2.0 0.459 5.9 LOS A 3.4 86.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2024 PM Existing Alt00 (Site Folder: Franciscan)] Broadway St at Franciscan Way
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Franciscan Way
Lane 1d 144 2.0 928 0.155 100 5.3 LOS A 0.6 15.2 Full 950 0.0 0.0 Approach 144 2.0 0.155 5.3 LOS A 0.6 15.2
East: WB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 436 2.0 1216 0.358 100 6.3 LOS A 2.1 54.2 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 436 2.0 0.358 6.3 LOS A 2.1 54.2
North: SB_Driveway
Lane 1d 4 2.0 767 0.005 100 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.5 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 2.0 0.005 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.5
West: EB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 476 2.0 1307 0.364 100 5.7 LOS A 2.3 58.4 Full 750 0.0 0.0 Approach 476 2.0 0.364 5.7 LOS A 2.3 58.4
Intersectio
n
1060 2.0 0.364 5.9 LOS A 2.3 58.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2044 AM Existing Alt00 (Site Folder: Franciscan)] Broadway St at Franciscan Way
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Franciscan Way
Lane 1d 53 2.0 855 0.062 100 4.8 LOS A 0.2 5.6 Full 950 0.0 0.0 Approach 53 2.0 0.062 4.8 LOS A 0.2 5.6
East: WB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 348 2.0 1299 0.268 100 4.9 LOS A 1.5 36.9 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 348 2.0 0.268 4.9 LOS A 1.5 36.9
North: SB_Driveway
Lane 1d 9 2.0 907 0.010 100 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.9 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 9 2.0 0.010 4.1 LOS A 0.0 0.9
West: EB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 570 2.0 1321 0.431 100 6.2 LOS A 3.1 77.6 Full 750 0.0 0.0 Approach 570 2.0 0.431 6.2 LOS A 3.1 77.6
Intersectio
n
979 2.0 0.431 5.6 LOS A 3.1 77.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [2044 PM Existing Alt00 (Site Folder: Franciscan)] Broadway St at Franciscan Way
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Franciscan Way
Lane 1d 184 2.0 831 0.221 100 6.7 LOS A 0.9 22.2 Full 950 0.0 0.0 Approach 184 2.0 0.221 6.7 LOS A 0.9 22.2
East: WB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 555 2.0 1180 0.471 100 7.9 LOS A 3.2 81.5 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 555 2.0 0.471 7.9 LOS A 3.2 81.5
North: SB_Driveway
Lane 1d 4 2.0 656 0.007 100 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.6 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 2.0 0.007 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.6
West: EB_Broadway St
Lane 1d 607 2.0 1295 0.468 100 7.0 LOS A 3.5 88.2 Full 750 0.0 0.0 Approach 607 2.0 0.468 7.0 LOS A 3.5 88.2
Intersectio
n
1350 2.0 0.471 7.3 LOS A 3.5 88.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [INT_2024_AM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Canal St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - Canal St
Lane 1d 108 2.0 1051 0.102 100 4.3 LOS A 0.4 11.2 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 108 2.0 0.102 4.3 LOS A 0.4 11.2
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 316 2.0 1333 0.237 100 4.3 LOS A 1.3 32.3 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 316 2.0 0.237 4.3 LOS A 1.3 32.3
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 279 2.0 1243 0.225 100 4.8 LOS A 1.2 29.2 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 279 2.0 0.225 4.8 LOS A 1.2 29.2
Intersectio
n
703 2.0 0.237 4.5 LOS A 1.3 32.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [INT_2024_PM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Canal St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - Canal St
Lane 1d 174 2.0 896 0.194 100 5.9 LOS A 0.9 21.8 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 174 2.0 0.194 5.9 LOS A 0.9 21.8
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 514 2.0 1291 0.398 100 6.3 LOS A 2.6 66.7 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 514 2.0 0.398 6.3 LOS A 2.6 66.7
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 459 2.0 1220 0.376 100 6.4 LOS A 2.3 58.6 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 459 2.0 0.376 6.4 LOS A 2.3 58.6
Intersectio
n
1147 2.0 0.398 6.3 LOS A 2.6 66.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [INT_2044_AM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Canal St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - Canal St
Lane 1d 133 2.0 990 0.134 100 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.8 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 133 2.0 0.134 4.8 LOS A 0.6 14.8
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 391 2.0 1329 0.294 100 4.8 LOS A 1.7 43.2 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 391 2.0 0.294 4.8 LOS A 1.7 43.2
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 346 2.0 1217 0.284 100 5.4 LOS A 1.5 39.2 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 346 2.0 0.284 5.4 LOS A 1.5 39.2
Intersectio
n
870 2.0 0.294 5.1 LOS A 1.7 43.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [INT_2044_PM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Canal St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - Canal St
Lane 1d 215 2.0 813 0.265 100 7.3 LOS A 1.2 30.3 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 215 2.0 0.265 7.3 LOS A 1.2 30.3
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 635 2.0 1276 0.497 100 7.6 LOS A 3.8 97.1 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 635 2.0 0.497 7.6 LOS A 3.8 97.1
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 566 2.0 1191 0.475 100 7.9 LOS A 3.3 83.9 Full 900 0.0 0.0 Approach 566 2.0 0.475 7.9 LOS A 3.3 83.9
Intersectio
n
1416 2.0 0.497 7.7 LOS A 3.8 97.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 2 [INT_2024_AM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Mildred St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - S Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 146 2.0 935 0.156 100 5.3 LOS A 0.7 17.2 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 146 2.0 0.156 5.3 LOS A 0.7 17.2
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 233 2.0 1056 0.220 100 5.4 LOS A 1.1 26.7 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 233 2.0 0.220 5.4 LOS A 1.1 26.7
North: SB - N Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 229 2.0 1075 0.213 100 5.3 LOS A 1.0 25.9 Full 800 0.0 0.0 Approach 229 2.0 0.213 5.3 LOS A 1.0 25.9
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 322 2.0 1219 0.265 100 5.2 LOS A 1.4 35.8 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 322 2.0 0.265 5.2 LOS A 1.4 35.8
Intersectio
n
930 2.0 0.265 5.3 LOS A 1.4 35.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 2 [INT_2024_PM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Mildred St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - S Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 109 2.0 752 0.144 100 6.3 LOS A 0.6 14.9 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 109 2.0 0.144 6.3 LOS A 0.6 14.9
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 404 2.0 1046 0.387 100 7.4 LOS A 2.2 55.4 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 404 2.0 0.387 7.4 LOS A 2.2 55.4
North: SB - N Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 276 2.0 914 0.302 100 7.1 LOS A 1.5 37.3 Full 800 0.0 0.0 Approach 276 2.0 0.302 7.1 LOS A 1.5 37.3
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 520 2.0 1174 0.443 100 7.5 LOS A 2.9 73.7 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 520 2.0 0.443 7.5 LOS A 2.9 73.7
Intersectio
n
1310 2.0 0.443 7.3 LOS A 2.9 73.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 2 [INT_2044_AM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Mildred St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - S Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 181 2.0 857 0.211 100 6.3 LOS A 0.9 23.6 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 181 2.0 0.211 6.3 LOS A 0.9 23.6
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 287 2.0 996 0.288 100 6.5 LOS A 1.4 36.3 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 287 2.0 0.288 6.5 LOS A 1.4 36.3
North: SB - N Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 283 2.0 1019 0.278 100 6.2 LOS A 1.4 35.1 Full 800 0.0 0.0 Approach 283 2.0 0.278 6.2 LOS A 1.4 35.1
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 399 2.0 1189 0.336 100 6.1 LOS A 1.9 48.8 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 399 2.0 0.336 6.1 LOS A 1.9 48.8
Intersectio
n
1149 2.0 0.336 6.3 LOS A 1.9 48.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 2 [INT_2044_PM_ALT00 (Site Folder: Mildred St RAB)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB - S Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 133 2.0 656 0.203 100 7.9 LOS A 0.8 20.9 Full 300 0.0 0.0 Approach 133 2.0 0.203 7.9 LOS A 0.8 20.9
East: WB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 500 2.0 986 0.507 100 9.8 LOS A 3.6 92.2 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 500 2.0 0.507 9.8 LOS A 3.6 92.2
North: SB - N Mildred Ave
Lane 1d 341 2.0 833 0.409 100 9.3 LOS A 2.3 57.4 Full 800 0.0 0.0 Approach 341 2.0 0.409 9.3 LOS A 2.3 57.4
West: EB - Broadway St
Lane 1d 642 2.0 1136 0.565 100 9.8 LOS A 4.3 109.6 Full 550 0.0 0.0 Approach 642 2.0 0.565 9.8 LOS A 4.3 109.6
Intersectio
n
1616 2.0 0.565 9.5 LOS A 4.3 109.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 3:31:22 PM Project: K:\SAC_RDWY\094557XXX - King City San Antonio Path SRTS\Analysis\Sidra\King City San Antonio_05.2024.sip9 ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix F
Preliminary Concept Layouts for Side Street Stop Control, All Way Stop Control, Proposed Signal, and Roundabout

BROADWAY ST
N

FRANCISCAN
W
AY

BROADWAY ST

FRANCISCAN W AY
N

BROADWAY ST

FRANCISCAN W AY
N

BROADWAY ST
N
CANAL
ST

BROADWAY ST
N

M ILDRED AVE

BROADWAY ST
N

M ILDRED AVE
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix G
Signal Warrants

Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
Source: CAMUTCD 2014, Revision 6
Major Street: Broadway St Number of Approach Lanes: 1
Minor Street: Franciscan Dr Number of Approach Lanes: 1 City, State: King City, California
Speed Limit or critical speed on major traffic > 40 mph? In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population? This locationCANNOT use the 70% Factor
Warrant 3 is Satisfied if a peak hour of an average day is plotted above the applicable curve.

Warrant 3 Satisfied: NO
Point falls above the the applicable curve
Plotted points representing the VPH above the applicable curve (1 total) Plotted points representing the VPH below the applicable curve (1 total) Both Approaches
Major Street
Highest Approach
Minor Street
578
33 866
136

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Approach Lanes 7:00 AM-8:00 AM 4:00 PM-5:00 PM
FALSE
FALSE
Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
Source: CAMUTCD 2014, Revision 6
Major Street: Broadway St Number of Approach Lanes: 1
Minor Street: Canal St Number of Approach Lanes: 1
City, State: King City, California
Speed Limit or critical speed on major traffic > 40 mph? In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population? This location CANNOT use the 70% Factor
Warrant 3 is Satisfied IF a peak hour of an average day is plotted above the applicable curve.

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Approach Lanes 8:00 AM-9:00 AM 4:00 PM-5:00 PM
FALSE
FALSE
Both Approaches
Major Street
Highest Approach
Minor Street
493
77 895
160
Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
Source: CAMUTCD 2014, Revision 6
Major Street: Broadway St Number of Approach Lanes: 1
Minor Street: Mildred Ave Number of Approach Lanes: 1
City, State: King City, California
Speed Limit or critical speed on major traffic > 40 mph? In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population? This location CANNOT use the 70% Factor
Warrant 3 is Satisfied if a peak hour of an average day is plotted above the applicable curve.

Warrant 3 Satisfied: YES
Point falls above the the applicable curve
Plotted points representing the VPH above the applicable curve (1 total) Plotted points representing the VPH below the applicable curve (1 total)

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Approach Lanes 8:00 AM-9:00 AM 4:00 PM-5:00 PM
FALSE
FALSE
Both Approaches
Major Street
Highest Approach
Minor Street
392
201
851
253
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix H
HSM Predictive Method Safety Analysis IHSDM KABCO Values

US 101 SB Ramps at Terven Ave/Airport Blvd
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.26% 12.19% 37.57% 47.75%
- - 0.009 0.082 0.444 1.368 1.738
KABC PDO 0.24% 2.27% 12.24% 37.75% 47.50%
- - 0.009 0.087 0.468 1.443 1.816
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.22% 11.97% 36.90% 48.69%
- - 0.006 0.061 0.327 1.009 1.332
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.23% 12.01% 37.02% 48.52%
- - 0.007 0.064 0.343 1.056 1.384
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.26% 12.19% 37.59% 47.73%
- - 0.009 0.082 0.444 1.369 1.738
KABC PDO 0.24% 2.27% 12.25% 37.76% 47.49%
- - 0.009 0.087 0.468 1.444 1.816
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.22% 11.97% 36.91% 48.67%
- - 0.006 0.061 0.328 1.010 1.332
KABC PDO 0.23% 2.23% 12.01% 37.03% 48.50%
- - 0.007 0.064 0.343 1.057 1.384
Year Total K A B C O
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.80% 4.34% 13.37% 81.40%

0.288 1.379 0.002 0.024 0.128 0.394 2.397
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.81% 4.36% 13.44% 81.31%

0.288 1.385 0.003 0.025 0.135 0.416 2.515
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.79% 4.26% 13.13% 81.73%

0.288 1.358 0.002 0.017 0.094 0.291 1.809
KABC PDO 0.08% 0.79% 4.27% 13.18% 81.67%

0.288 1.362 0.002 0.018 0.099 0.304 1.885
Existing Signal Safety Values
2025 3.64
2036 2.74
2035 3.82
2045 2.85
CMF
2045

2.94 2.31
2045 2.85
Proposed Roundabout Safety Values
CMF
Proposed Signal Safety Values
2035 3.09
2036 2.21
2025
CMF
2025 3.64
2035 3.82
2036 2.74
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix I
Proposed Traffic Signal Control Synchro Operational Analysis King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 207 10 223 146 229
v/c Ratio 0.73 0.30 0.06 0.58 0.44 0.60
Control Delay (s/veh) 59.7 16.2 28.3 24.8 23.8 19.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 59.7 16.2 28.3 24.8 23.8 19.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 39 3 54 35 34
Queue Length 95th (ft) #142 128 18 135 94 102
Internal Link Dist (ft) 121 152 195 84
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 75
Base Capacity (vph) 158 681 158 556 585 576
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.30 0.06 0.40 0.25 0.40
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 103 169 15 9 151 47 34 72 24 39 41 124 Future Volume (veh/h) 103 169 15 9 151 47 34 72 24 39 41 124 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.87 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 190 17 10 170 53 38 81 27 44 46 139 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 135 538 48 18 321 100 79 168 56 64 66 201
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1648 147 1781 1234 385 447 953 318 293 306 925 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 0 207 10 0 223 146 0 0 229 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1796 1781 0 1618 1718 0 0 1524 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 5.2 0.3 0.0 7.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 5.2 0.3 0.0 7.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.24 0.26 0.18 0.19 0.61
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 135 0 586 18 0 421 303 0 0 331 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.35 0.55 0.00 0.53 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 135 0 586 135 0 451 479 0 0 425 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 0.0 15.2 29.2 0.0 18.8 22.0 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 38.6 0.0 0.4 23.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 2.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 65.6 0.0 15.6 52.3 0.0 19.8 23.1 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E B D B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 323 233 146 229
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.5 21.2 23.1 24.7
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 23.3 16.9 8.5 19.4 14.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 16.5 16.5 4.5 16.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 7.2 10.2 5.8 9.0 6.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 26.6
HCM 6th LOS C
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 162 358 31 373 109 276
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.20 0.77 0.43 0.72
Control Delay (s/veh) 35.0 17.6 37.2 38.1 31.5 31.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 35.0 17.6 37.2 38.1 31.5 31.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 90 13 144 37 75
Queue Length 95th (ft) 132 222 43 #335 89 #191
Internal Link Dist (ft) 121 152 195 84
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 75
Base Capacity (vph) 443 869 154 529 448 472
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.41 0.20 0.71 0.24 0.58
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2024 Existing
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 151 307 26 29 293 54 23 53 25 57 40 160 Future Volume (veh/h) 151 307 26 29 293 54 23 53 25 57 40 160 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 162 330 28 31 315 58 25 57 27 61 43 172 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 225 604 51 48 390 72 50 113 54 78 55 219
Arrive On Green 0.13 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1690 143 1781 1514 279 397 904 428 357 252 1006 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 162 0 358 31 0 373 109 0 0 276 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1833 1781 0 1792 1730 0 0 1614 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 9.2 1.0 0.0 11.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 9.2 1.0 0.0 11.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.16 0.23 0.25 0.22 0.62
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 225 0 655 48 0 462 217 0 0 352 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.00 0.55 0.64 0.00 0.81 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 503 0 939 176 0 589 486 0 0 456 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.7 0.0 15.1 28.3 0.0 20.4 24.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.7 13.5 0.0 6.4 1.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 5.3 1.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 29.0 0.0 15.8 41.8 0.0 26.9 25.8 0.0 0.0 28.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B D C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 520 404 109 276
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.9 28.0 25.8 28.3
Approach LOS B C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.6 25.0 16.8 11.4 19.2 11.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.8 30.1 16.6 16.6 19.3 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 11.2 11.5 7.1 13.5 5.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 0.8 0.3 1.2 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 24.7
HCM 6th LOS C
King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 138 248 12 265 176 273
v/c Ratio 0.93 0.37 0.08 0.67 0.50 0.68
Control Delay (s/veh) 97.6 18.0 30.5 29.1 25.7 23.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 97.6 18.0 30.5 29.1 25.7 23.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 55 4 74 49 51
Queue Length 95th (ft) #176 161 20 #172 112 137
Internal Link Dist (ft) 121 152 195 84
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 75
Base Capacity (vph) 147 669 147 519 546 544
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.94 0.37 0.08 0.51 0.32 0.50
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

King City San Antonio Path SRTS 2044 Future
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 127 209 19 11 186 58 42 89 30 48 51 153 Future Volume (veh/h) 127 209 19 11 186 58 42 89 30 48 51 153 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.88 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 138 227 21 12 202 63 46 97 33 52 55 166 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 130 516 48 21 312 97 83 174 59 67 71 214
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1640 152 1781 1229 383 450 948 322 292 309 932 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 138 0 248 12 0 265 176 0 0 273 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1791 1781 0 1613 1720 0 0 1532 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 6.8 0.4 0.0 9.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 6.8 0.4 0.0 9.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.24 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.61
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 130 0 564 21 0 409 316 0 0 352 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 1.06 0.00 0.44 0.56 0.00 0.65 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 130 0 564 130 0 432 461 0 0 410 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.6 0.0 16.8 30.3 0.0 20.5 22.9 0.0 0.0 22.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 96.1 0.0 0.5 20.8 0.0 3.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 0.0 2.7 0.3 0.0 3.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 124.6 0.0 17.3 51.1 0.0 23.6 24.4 0.0 0.0 30.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F B D C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 386 277 176 273
Approach Delay, s/veh 55.7 24.8 24.4 30.1
Approach LOS E C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.7 23.4 18.1 8.5 19.6 15.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 16.5 16.5 4.5 16.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 8.8 12.3 6.5 11.0 7.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 36.8
HCM 6th LOS D
2044 Future
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 447 39 466 135 344
v/c Ratio 0.77 0.55 0.35 0.84 0.53 0.86
Control Delay (s/veh) 56.8 21.2 48.6 41.1 37.5 47.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 56.8 21.2 48.6 41.1 37.5 47.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 174 20 213 59 136
Queue Length 95th (ft) #234 295 54 #393 115 #314
Internal Link Dist (ft) 121 152 195 84
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 75
Base Capacity (vph) 271 844 110 658 380 415
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.53 0.35 0.71 0.36 0.83
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
2044 Future
12: Mildred Ave & Broadway St Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 186 379 32 36 362 67 28 65 31 70 49 198 Future Volume (veh/h) 186 379 32 36 362 67 28 65 31 70 49 198 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 202 412 35 39 393 73 30 71 34 76 53 215 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 243 685 58 53 452 84 49 115 55 81 56 228
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1691 144 1781 1514 281 384 909 435 357 249 1010 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 202 0 447 39 0 466 135 0 0 344 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1834 1781 0 1795 1729 0 0 1616 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 0.0 14.4 1.6 0.0 18.5 5.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.3 0.0 14.4 1.6 0.0 18.5 5.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.16 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.62
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 243 0 743 53 0 536 219 0 0 365 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.00 0.60 0.74 0.00 0.87 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 284 0 868 116 0 680 379 0 0 365 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.6 0.0 17.6 36.2 0.0 25.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.5 0.0 0.9 18.1 0.0 9.8 2.8 0.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 0.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 48.1 0.0 18.5 54.3 0.0 34.8 33.9 0.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D C C E
Approach Vol, veh/h 649 505 135 344
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.7 36.3 33.9 61.0
Approach LOS C D C E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 34.5 21.0 14.3 26.4 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.9 35.6 17.0 12.0 28.5 16.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 16.4 17.7 10.3 20.5 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 37.9
HCM 6th LOS D
ICE – Broadway Street at Franciscan Way, Canal Street, and Mildred Avenue May 20, 2024
Appendix J
Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Ratio Worksheet
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $138,150 $92,348 $82,610
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $1,983,646 $1,322,668 $1,189,335 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 922 3272 1010
Annual Cost $13,283 $48,665 $15,362
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $278,938 $1,021,975 $322,594 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Cost $3,236 $4,387 $3,454
Total Discounted Lify Cycle Cost $47,214 $64,008 $50,395 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $600 $600 $1,200
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $8,754 $8,754 $17,508
Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $0 $0 $0
Total O&M Costs $9,354 $9,354 $18,708
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
High Approximation $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,135,000
Low Approximation $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,135,000
Average for Both Ramps $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,135,000 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Safety $ 1,983,646 $ 1,322,668 $ 1,189,335
Delay $ 278,938 $ 1,021,975 $ 322,594
Emissions $ 47,214 $ 64,008 $ 50,395
O&M $ 9,354 $ 9,354 $ 18,708
Initial Capital $ 1,000,000 $ 1,001,000 $ 1,135,000
Total Net Present Value $3,319,152 $3,419,005 $2,716,033 Added Benefits Compared to SSSC SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Safety $ - $ 660,978 $ 794,311
Delay $ - $ (743,038) $ (43,657)
Emissions $ - $ (16,793) $ (3,181)
Total Benefits $ - $ (98,854) $ 747,473
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions SSSC AWSC Roundabout O&M $ - $ - $ 9,354
Initial Capital $ - $ 1,000 $ 135,000
Total Costs $ - $ 1,000 $ 144,354
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions N/A -98.85 5.18 Delay
Operations and Maintenance
Initial Capital
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Total Costs ( C )
Total Benefits ( B )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Emissions

FRANCISCAN WAY - LIFE CYCLE COST CALCULATIONS

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
Intersection
Intersection Icons
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $93,378 $78,006 $73,382
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $1,337,416 $1,124,302 $1,086,327 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 806 3566 983
Annual Cost $11,913 $52,245 $14,880
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $250,170 $1,097,146 $312,478 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual Cost $2,951 $4,095 $3,341
Total Discounted Lify Cycle Cost $43,056 $59,747 $48,746 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $600 $600 $1,200
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $8,754 $8,754 $17,508
Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $0 $0 $0
Total O&M Costs $9,354 $9,354 $18,708
SSSC AWSC Roundabout
High Approximation $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,090,000
Low Approximation $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,090,000
Average for Both Ramps $1,000,000 $1,001,000 $1,090,000 SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Safety $ 1,337,416 $ 1,124,302 $ 1,086,327
Delay $ 250,170 $ 1,097,146 $ 312,478
Emissions $ 43,056 $ 59,747 $ 48,746
O&M $ 9,354 $ 9,354 $ 18,708
Initial Capital $ 1,000,000 $ 1,001,000 $ 1,090,000
Total Net Present Value $2,639,996 $3,291,550 $2,556,260 Added Benefits Compared to SSSC SSSC AWSC Roundabout
Safety $ - $ 213,114 $ 251,089
Delay $ - $ (846,976) $ (62,308)
Emissions $ - $ (16,691) $ (5,690)
Total Benefits $ - $ (650,553) $ 5,075,018
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions SSSC AWSC Roundabout O&M $ - $ - $ 9,354
Initial Capital $ - $ 1,000 $ 90,000
Total Costs $0 $ 1,000 $ 99,354
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions N/A -650.55 51.08 Delay
Operations and Maintenance
Initial Capital
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Total Costs ( C )
Total Benefits ( B )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Emissions

CANAL STREET - LIFE CYCLE COST CALCULATIONS

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
Intersection
Intersection Icons
Signal Roundabout
Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $220,708 $99,926
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $3,191,275 $1,436,895 Signal Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 6091 1412
Annual Cost $90,898 $21,289
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $1,908,856 $447,060
Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost $6,315 $6,893
Total Discounted Lify Cycle Cost $92,138 $100,571
Signal Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $9,700 $1,200
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $141,526 $17,508
Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $0 $0
Total O&M Costs $151,226 $18,708
Signal Roundabout
High Approximation $1,150,000 $1,195,000
Low Approximation $1,150,000 $1,195,000
Average for Both Ramps $1,150,000 $1,195,000
Signal Roundabout
Safety $ 3,191,275 $ 1,436,895
Delay $ 1,908,856 $ 447,060
Emissions $ 92,138 $ 100,571
O&M $ 151,226 $ 18,708
Initial Capital $ 1,150,000 $ 1,195,000
Total Net Present Value $6,493,496 $3,198,235
Added Benefits Compared to Signal Signal Roundabout
Safety $ - $ 1,754,380
Delay $ - $ 1,461,796
Emissions $ - $ (8,433)
Total Benefits $0 $ 23,976,822
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions Signal Roundabout O&M $ - $ (132,518)
Initial Capital $ - $ 45,000
Total Costs $0 $ (87,518)
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions N/A -273.97
Delay
Operations and Maintenance
Initial Capital
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Total Costs ( C )
Total Benefits ( B )
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
Emissions

MILDRED AVENUE - LIFE CYCLE COST CALCULATIONS

PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE) Safety
Intersection
Intersection Icons

King City City CouncilJanuary 14, 2025

King City City Council
January 14, 2025