Agenda packet, regular meeting, first session — King City City Council, March 25, 2025

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CITY OF KING CITY COUNCIL
AND
Sitting as SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF

THE RDA FOR THE CITY OF KING
TUESDAY MARCH 25, 2025
6:00 P.M.

CITY HALL
212 S. VANDERHURST AVENUE
KING CITY, CALIFORNIA 93930
The City Council meeting will be conducted in hybrid in-person/virtual format.

To join the meeting virtually, please use the link below to join the Zoom meeting:
https://bit.ly/3e0zvaR
Meeting ID: 881 5287 9536
Or by telephone: 1-669-900-9128
Passcode: 052933
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, Please contact the City Clerk's Office (831-386-5925) at least 48 hours prior to the Meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* Please submit all correspondence for City Council PRIOR to the meeting with a copy to the City Clerk.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:

Council Members Oscar Avalos, Robert Cullen, Carlos Victoria, Mayor Pro Tem Carlos DeLeon, and Mayor Mike LeBarre

FLAG SALUTE

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT
Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes’ total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council that is not on the agenda. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda. Comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not to any individual Council Member.

Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member, staff member or member of the audience is not permitted.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS & COMMITTEE REPORTS
Individual Council Members may comment on Council business, his or her Council activities, City operations, projects or other items of community interest. Council Members may also request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting on any matter or take action to direct staff to prepare a staff report for a future agenda.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Comments presented by the City Manager, City Attorney or other staff on City business

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.
activities, City operations, projects or other items of community interest. Council Members may also request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting on any matter or take action to direct staff to prepare a staff report for a future agenda.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Comments presented by the City Manager, City Attorney or other staff on City business and/or announcements.

CONSENT AGENDA
The following items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Members of the audience may speak on any item(s) listed on the Consent Agenda. Any Council Member, the City Manager, or the City Attorney may request that an item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to allow for full discussion. The Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion. Items withdrawn from the Consent Agenda may be considered by separate motions at the conclusion of the discussion of each item.

Consideration: Meeting Minutes Of March 11, 2025 Council Meeting Recommendation: approve and file.
9(A) 03-11-2025 MINUTES_.PDF
Consideration: City Of King Check Register March 1-15, 2025 Recommendation: receive and file.
9(B) CITY OF KING CHECK REGISTER MARCH 1-15, 2025.PDF
Consideration: Commission And Committee Appointments
Recommendation: adopt a Resolution : 1) reappointing Jeff Francis and Scott Prewitt to the Airport Advisory Committee; 2) reappointing Teri Storelli and Margarita Lopez to the Planning Commission.
9(C) COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS.PDF
Consideration: Amendments To The Schedule Of Administrative Citation Fines Recommendation: adopt a Resolution amending the City of King Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines.
9(D) AMENDMENTS TO THE SCHEDULE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION FINES.PDF
Consideration Of Annual General Plan Report And Housing Element Annual Report For 2024
Recommendation: review and accept the 2024 Annual General Plan Progress and Housing Element Annual Reports.
9(E) ANNUAL GENRAL PLAN REPORT AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024.PDF
Consideration: Acceptance Of Easements For Public Utility Purposes Over (I) Nino

8. 9.

Documents:

F.
9(E) ANNUAL GENRAL PLAN REPORT AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024.PDF
Consideration: Acceptance Of Easements For Public Utility Purposes Over (I) Nino Property, And (Ii) City-Owned Property
Recommendation: Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-5025 to accept easements for utility and related purposes on (i) Nino Family L.P. property, and (ii) City-owned land (jointly the “Easements”); and 2) grant the City Manager signature authorization for minor changes to the easement deeds if required by the County Recorder’s Office and to execute the Certificate of Acceptance. 9(F) ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.PDF
Consideration: Interpretation Regarding Worker Permit Requirements For Commercial Cannabis Business Labor Contractors
Recommendation: 1) adopt a Resolution interpreting the application of employee work permit requirements for commercial cannabis businesses to employees of labor contractors under the provisions of Section 17.03.070 of Title 17 of the King City Municipal Code; and 2) direct staff to prepare an ordinance incorporating the interpretation into the Municipal Code provisions.
9(G) WORK PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS.PDF Consideration: Prohousing Designation Program Application Recommendation: adopt a Resolution authorizing submittal of a Prohousing Designation Program Application with the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD")
9(H) PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION.PDF
Consideration: Approval Of Loan Document With CHISPA For The Mills Ranch Affordable Housing Project Under The Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (PLHA) Recommendation: 1) authorize the City Attorney to approve the final Loan Agreement for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (“PLHA”) financing for CHISPA’s affordable housing project to be constructed at the following five addresses: 691 Brandywine Lane, 235 Ermosa Way, 147 Ermosa Way, 260 Legacy Drive, 164 Legacy Drive in a loan amount of one hundred and twenty-six thousand, one hundred and eighty six dollars and seventy-five cents ($126,186.25), and 2) authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to review and approve any and all documents related to this project.
9(I) APPROVAL OF LOAN DOCUMENT WITH CHISPA FOR THE MILLS RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT UNDER THE PLHA.PDF

PUBLIC HEARINGS

Documents:

10. 11.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

REGULAR BUSINESS
Consideration: Process For Comprehensive Plan To End Youth Violence Phase II Plan Recommendation: approve the proposed process for developing a second phase of the King City Comprehensive Plan to End Youth Violence.
11(A) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN.PDF
Consideration: King City Golf Course Restoration Project Process And Amendment To Operation Contract Services Agreement With First Tee Monterey County Recommendation: 1) provide direction to staff to proceed with an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to amend the project cost estimate for the King City Golf Course restoration project; and 2) approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the contract services agreement with First Tee Monterey County for operation and management of the King City Golf Course; and 3) authorize the City Manager to make non-substantive changes as necessary in a form approved by the City Attorney.
11(B) GOLF COURSE.PDF

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
Announcement(s) of any reportable action(s) taken in Closed Session will be made in open session and repeated at the beginning of the next Regular City Council meeting as this portion of the meeting is not recorded.

ADJOURNMENT
The City of King is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

10. 11.

Documents:

12. 13.

Page 1 of 3 ends

City Council Meeting
March 11, 2025

1.__CALL TO ORDER:

Regular Meeting called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor LeBarre.

2.__ROLL CALL:

City Council: Mayor Mike LeBarre, Mayor Pro Tem Carlos DeLeon, Council member Carlos Victoria, Council member Rob Cullen, Council members Oscar Avalos (absent) City Staff: City Manager Steve Adams, City Attorney Roy Santos (remote); City Clerk Erica Sonne

3.__FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Mayor LeBarre.

4. CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

None

5.__SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:

None

6. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS:

Evangelica Perez spoke about the uptick in violence and would like the City Council consideration putting another SRO Officer at the schools to help protect children a little more. She would like to have fights prevented. City Manager Adams asked her for her information so he could reach out to her.

Paster Ken Reese expressed gratitude for the Resolution for a Day of Peace and gratitude for City Council, Mayor and City Manager for their participation and help on the Day of Peace. He expressed gratitude for others that were involved as well.

Liz Hall spoke on Waste Management 4 Letters were sent out and she gave a progress report on progress being made. She also reported that there will be their first bulky drop off for 2025 on April 12th.

7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Mayor LeBarre stated that staff had prepared a very detailed strategy for the tax measure and have a plan in place with one of the items being an additional SRO officer however when the sales tax increase measure was not passed it has kept the city from getting an additional SRO officer. Our city is very conscience of where our dollars of our community are going and make sure they are used effectively.

When we ask for more dollars, it is for a good reason.

Council Member Cullen stated we have an issue and crime has reared its ugly head again. We had and have a plan in place and we tried to do a sales tax measure. The community wasn’t comfortable passing that. If we had more resources we could do more. With limited resources we have to make tough decisions for what we do with limited resources. The sales tax measure will go back on the ballot in 2026 and he asked for support of the sales tax measure so we can see crime go down, see more youth activities and more resources in our town we have to pass that sales tax measure. The vast majority of the sales tax is from the people who pass through town and purchase gas. It is critical that we pass the sales tax measure. 9(A)

Page 2 of 3 ends

Council Member Victoria stated Ms. Perez has been working with the school districts on what community members can do to reduce crime and suspensions. In 2026 the sales tax measure needs to pass to help with getting another SRO officer. School district report: Prom is coming soon and there will be an opportunity for young ladies to get a free dress. There is a field trip on Monday the 17th to go get dresses.

The Golf team won 2
nd place in the recent tournament. Spring Carnival moved to March 20th. Santa Lucia had a walking field trip for First Tee. Board meeting tomorrow. Chalone Peaks preparing for end of year activities. Council Member Victoria thanked the Police Department for apprehending persons responsible for the incident.

Mayor Pro Tem DeLeon wanted to reiterate the importance of the tax measure. It will be the third time for it to go on the ballot. He stated that what happened from 2016 on with funding at the federal level, if we don’t get the tax measure passed it is going to get financially worrisome. With the shooting he was pleased that the community came together and called in what they saw so that an arrest could be made.

He has noticed that each of the shootings has resulted in an arrest. The Police Department is doing very good work. The sales tax measure goes hand in hand with that and maintaining the camera system has as well. He will not be able to make the April 8th meeting.

8. CITY STAFF REPORTS AND COMMENTS:

City Manager Adams thanked all the council for the comments on the sales tax measure. He recognized Pastor Reese for the Day of Peace again. The budget is a little behind with all the finance program changes.

He is proposing May 29th for the budget workshop. Staff will be proposing some ideas at the next meet on the Comprehensive plan to end youth violence.

City Attorney Santos had nothing to report this evening.

9. CONSENT
A. Consideration: Meeting Minutes of February 25, 2025 Council Meeting B. Consideration: City of King Check Register February 16, through February 28, 2025 C. Consideration: Modifications to Parking Restrictions to Comply with AB 413 D. Consideration: City of King KCCP Payments for the Month of February 2025 Action: Motion to approve consent agenda items A- D by Victoria seconded by Cullen.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members: Avalos
ABSTAIN: Council Members:

Mayor LeBarre stated that we would be hearing Item 11(A) before 10(A)

11. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. Consideration: Wastewater Rate Study
City Manager Adams introduced this item.

Consultants Alex Handlers and Erik Helgesen from Bartle Wells to make a presentation.

Karen Jernigan is concerned about the affordability to live in King City because of sewer, water, electricity and rent. She is concerned that younger people can’t afford to live here. She feels that more families will be living together and cause overcrowding. She is concerned also that it could jeopardize the sales tax measure. She appreciates the council taking this seriously and trying to do something about it.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Action: Motion to 1) accept the Wastewater Rate Study; and 2) direct staff to distribute a Proposition 218 Public Hearing Notice for proposed wastewater rate increases to be held on May 13, 2025 by LeBarre seconded by Cullen.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Cullen, Victoria, NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members: Avalos
ABSTAIN: Council Members:

Council Member Cullen recused himself from item 10(A) due to a conflict and he left the meeting.

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

A. Consideration: The Riverbed Wildfire Prevention Plan, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Community Development Director Liberto introduced this item and Nate Dayley Deer Creek Resources and Stuart Poulter, EMC
Christine Phillips stated that she wanted to clarify alternative housing would be part of this plan and she is concerned that there is a lot of illegal dumping of yard waste down there. She also asked if there will be further Public Hearings on the plans for the annexation of the property.

City Manager stayed that we are looking into adding this area into the Cities Sphere of Influence.

Mayor LeBarre asked about Arundo removal as it sucks up a lot of water.

Action: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Riverbed Wildfire Prevention Plan (Plan or Project) and adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; 2) direct staff to file a Notice of Determination (NOD); and 3) direct staff to proceed with the process of amending the City’s Sphere of Influence and annexation of the Riverbed area by DeLeon seconded by Victoria.

AYES: Council Members: LeBarre, DeLeon, Victoria,
NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members: Avalos, Cullen,
ABSTAIN: Council Members:

12. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
None
ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor LeBarre adjourned the meeting at 7:26p.m.

Approved Signatures:

Mayor Mike LeBarre City Clerk, Erica Sonne
City of King City of King
Item No. 9(B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MIKE HOWARD, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF KING CHECK REGISTER
MARCH 1 THROUGH MARCH 15, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council receive and file.

BACKGROUND:

At least once a month, the City Treasurer shall submit to the City Council, a copy of the invoices paid for the previous month.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this item is to provide the Council an opportunity to review and monitor ongoing expenditures. These documents are attached.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

No Environmental Review required for this item.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Receive and file the report; or

2. Provide other direction to staff regarding requests for additional information.

3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 1 of 6
Check Report
King City, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Bank Code: POOL-WFB-POOL - WELLS FARGO BANK
Payment Type: EFT
ADAMS ADAMS ASHBY GROUP LLC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 562.50 10163 6302 Invoice 02/28/2025 PLHA Program Administration 0.00 562.50 A & W ALESHIRE & WYNDER LLP 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 29,824.69 10164 93266 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services 0.00 5,645.19
93268 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services 0.00 87.00
93269 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services 0.00 2,226.00
93270 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services - Grocery Outlet Litigation 0.00 680.00 93271 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services - HCD Litigation 0.00 20,548.50 93272 Invoice 02/28/2025 Legal Services - Homeless Project 0.00 638.00 ALVAREZ ALVAREZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 10,382.53 10165 75229 Invoice 02/28/2025 Laptop & USB Dock 0.00 3,842.87 75349 Invoice 02/28/2025 Net. Manage. Equip. Subscription - Meraki… 0.00 1,276.81 75355 Invoice 02/28/2025 Printer 0.00 489.40
75376 Invoice 02/28/2025 Net. Manage. Equip. Subscription - Meraki… 0.00 638.41 75381 Invoice 02/28/2025 Printer Installation 0.00 165.00 75382 Invoice 02/28/2025 Firewall & Access Point Installation 0.00 1,069.20 75404 Invoice 02/28/2025 Internet - Service Provider 0.00 2,900.84 AM SUPPLY AMERICAN SUPPLY CO 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 144.26 10166 3052491 Invoice 02/28/2025 Janitorial Supplies 0.00 221.42 3052493-CM Credit Memo 02/28/2025 CREDIT Janitorial Supplies 0.00 -77.16 CAROLLO CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 174,702.00 10167 FB62231 Invoice 02/28/2025 WWTP Upgrade-KC 0.00 174,702.00 CSGCON CSG CONSULTANTS INC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 10,011.00 10168 59932 Invoice 02/28/2025 Mark McClain Inspector 0.00 9,693.75 B250071 Invoice 02/28/2025 CSG Plan Review 1015 Broadway 0.00 317.25 GIS GONZALES IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 100.25 10169 KC127002 Invoice 02/28/2025 PPE - Rain Boot 0.00 34.07
KC127102 Invoice 02/28/2025 Broadway Bulbout Repairs 0.00 36.69 KC127176 Invoice 02/28/2025 PPE - Leather Gloves 0.00 29.49 LA HEARNE LA HEARNE COMPANY 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 321.68 10170 1502228 Invoice 02/28/2025 Pool Chemicals 0.00 321.68
MAGICC NORMA L DOMINGUEZ 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 6,440.00 10171 5023 Invoice 02/28/2025 Janitorial - Park & City 0.00 6,440.00 RRM DESIGN RRM DESIGN GROUP INC 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 1,583.75 10172 0597-04-0125 Invoice 02/28/2025 King City Downtown Plaza Construction 0.00 1,583.75 SPECTRUMT SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE Charter Communication 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 319.98 10173 170002601020725 Invoice 02/28/2025 Internet 0.00 319.98 SPCA THE SPCA FOR MONTEREY COUNTY 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 1,470.00 10174 1-25 Invoice 02/28/2025 SPCA - January 0.00 1,470.00
TORO TORO PETROLEUM CORP 03/03/2025 EFT 0.00 4,440.17 10175 CL82942 Invoice 02/28/2025 Fuel 0.00 3,043.93
CL83439 Invoice 02/28/2025 Fuel 0.00 1,396.24
Total EFT: 0.00 240,302.81
Check Report Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 2 of 6
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Payment Type: Regular
KC GLASS KING CITY GLASS SERVICES 03/04/2025 Regular 0.00 -981.25 72203 GARCIATE TERRY GARCIA 03/04/2025 Regular 0.00 -32.60 72216 MOCO CLERK MONTEREY COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 Regular 0.00 3,018.75 72461 031125 Invoice 03/11/2025 CEQA Notice of Determination for Riverbe… 0.00 3,018.75 AFLAC AFLAC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 188.42 72462
INV0000523 Invoice 03/14/2025 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 85.58 INV0000524 Invoice 03/14/2025 PAYROLL DEDUCTION - INSURANCE 0.00 102.84 ANTHEM BLU ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 4,026.36 72463 INV0000525 Invoice 03/14/2025 HEALTH INSURANCE DEDUCTION 0.00 4,026.36 CAL PERS R CAL PERS RETIREMENTSYSTEM 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 38,541.87 72464 INV0000531 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYER 0.00 6,329.70 INV0000532 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS PEPRA MISC EMPLOYEE 0.00 6,233.20 INV0000533 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYER 0.00 7,700.96 INV0000534 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS PEPRA SAFETY EMPLOYEE 0.00 7,695.38 INV0000535 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 1,593.24 INV0000536 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS MISC CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 921.55 INV0000537 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS SAFETY CLASSIC EMPLOYER 0.00 5,590.90 INV0000538 Invoice 03/14/2025 PERS SAFTEY CLASSIC EMPLOYEE 0.00 2,476.94 CACHLDSUP CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 522.00 72465 INV0000540 Invoice 03/14/2025 M. DILLON CHILD SUPPORT 0.00 522.00 K.C.P.O.A. K.C.P.O.A. 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 825.00 72466 INV0000529 Invoice 03/14/2025 KCPOA UNION DUES 0.00 825.00 K.C.P.S.A. K.C.P.S.A. 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 340.00 72467 INV0000530 Invoice 03/14/2025 KCPSA UNION DUES 0.00 340.00 ICMA RETIR MISSION SQUARE-302397 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 8,743.87 72468 INV0000520 Invoice 03/14/2025 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 720.61 INV0000521 Invoice 03/14/2025 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 639.27 INV0000522 Invoice 03/14/2025 EMPLOYER MATCH - ICMA DC 0.00 443.82 INV0000526 Invoice 03/14/2025 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 4,438.84 INV0000527 Invoice 03/14/2025 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 2,206.06 INV0000528 Invoice 03/14/2025 DEF COMP EMPLOYEE 0.00 295.27 SEIU SEIU LOCAL 521 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 476.25 72469 INV0000539 Invoice 03/14/2025 SEIU UNION DUES 0.00 476.25 A & G PUMP A & G PUMPING INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 187.00 72470 25-100306 Invoice 03/14/2025 Porta Potty Trailer Rental 0.00 187.00 KCTVHARD ALCANTAR HARDWARE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 174.99 72471 577282 Invoice 03/14/2025 PPE / Equipment for Weed Abatement Bik… 0.00 96.77 577545 Invoice 03/14/2025 Chemical Sprayer Repair 0.00 20.64 577968 Invoice 03/14/2025 Building Maintenance Windows 0.00 29.33 577978 Invoice 03/14/2025 Building Maintenance Window Cleaning S… 0.00 28.25 TRUJILLOA ALICIA TRUJILLO 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 117.20 72472 03112025 Invoice 03/14/2025 Reimbursements 0.00 117.20
AMAZON AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 604.49 72473 13N1-F4N9-9FGX Invoice 03/14/2025 SOCOS Supplies 0.00 15.06 161T-W7HV-XR… Invoice 03/14/2025 First Aid Kits 0.00 52.08 1FVN-NVKK-WDP9 Invoice 03/14/2025 Office Supplies & Case for Office Manager 0.00 87.33 1P9L-F3K9-YKY1 Invoice 03/14/2025 Pool Test Kit 0.00 235.98 1PWC-GNYK-9K4G Invoice 03/14/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 39.16 1RF6-J1XF-PDXT Invoice 03/14/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 85.98 1XP4-QG9L-C171 Invoice 03/14/2025 Softball Supplies 0.00 88.90 Check Report Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 3 of 6
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount CARMEL FIR ART BLACK 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 72474 125080 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 125081 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 125082 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 125083 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fire Sprinkler System 0.00 250.00 AT & T AT & T 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 159.79 72475
022225 Invoice 03/14/2025 Internet 0.00 159.79
AT & T-FIR AT & T MOBILITY 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 218.35 72476 030125 Invoice 03/14/2025 Cellphones - City 0.00 218.35 AT&T - C AT&T Calnet 3 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 195.54 72477 000023077875 Invoice 03/14/2025 Cell Phone 0.00 78.84
000023079042 Invoice 03/14/2025 Phone - Land Line 0.00 13.84 022425 Invoice 03/14/2025 911 Line 0.00 31.81
022425B Invoice 03/14/2025 KCPD Line 0.00 31.81
030425 Invoice 03/14/2025 Phone Service 0.00 39.24
BENITEZ SECURITY BENITEZ SECURITY SERVICES 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 8,640.00 72478 2652 Invoice 03/14/2025 Monarch Inn Interim Homeless Shelter Se… 0.00 3,264.00 2669 Invoice 03/14/2025 Monarch Inn Interim Homeless Shelter Se… 0.00 2,688.00 2679 Invoice 03/14/2025 Monarch Inn Temporary Shelter Security 0.00 2,688.00 CAL WATER CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 9,935.47 72479 24-25 Invoice 03/14/2025 Water 0.00 9,935.47
CASEY PRIN CASEY PRINTING INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 106.58 72480 226066 Invoice 03/14/2025 Immigration Forum Flyer Prints 0.00 106.58 CNC ELECTR CLARK N CLEVENGER CNC ELECTRIC AND OUTDOOR POWER 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 53.81 72481 7933 Invoice 03/14/2025 Trimmer Repair 0.00 100.13
7935 Credit Memo 03/14/2025 Credit INV# 7933 0.00 -100.13 7950 Invoice 03/14/2025 Stihl Chain & Saw Lube 0.00 53.81 CO OF MO S COUNTY OF MONTEREY Sheriff * Marshal * Coroner 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 17,838.86 72482 2837 Invoice 03/14/2025 CJIS 0.00 17,838.86
DAVE'S REP DAVE'S REPAIR SERVICE David L Gambetta 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 95.00 72483 38102 Invoice 03/14/2025 Monthly Inspection 0.00 95.00
DEPT ACCNT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 940.00 72484 794691 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fingerprints 0.00 940.00
DIMES MEDI DIMES MEDIA CORPORATION 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 325.00 72485 4628 Invoice 03/14/2025 KRKC Ads 0.00 250.00
4672 Invoice 03/14/2025 KRKC Ads 0.00 75.00
EARTHSYS EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 6,200.00 72486 852832 Invoice 03/14/2025 KC Homeless Shelter 0.00 6,200.00 GISPL GIS PLUMBING 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 251.46 72487 4708 Invoice 03/14/2025 Womens Locker Room Drain Repair 0.00 251.46 INDEPENDEN JEFFREY D HIETHOFF 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 2,540.00 72488 013125 Invoice 03/14/2025 Independent Fee Estimate - Airport 0.00 2,540.00 TIRE KING JOSE RODRIGUEZ TIRE KING & AUTO EXPRESS 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 2,851.48 72489 91257 Invoice 03/14/2025 Vehicle Maint. 0.00 223.60
91278 Invoice 03/14/2025 Vehicle Maint. 0.00 190.84
91286 Invoice 03/14/2025 Vehicle Maint. 0.00 955.59
91370 Invoice 03/14/2025 Vehicle Maint. 0.00 1,401.45
91424 Invoice 03/14/2025 Car Wash 0.00 80.00
KC AUTO SE KC AUTO SERVICE LLC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 617.21 72490 Check Report Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 4 of 6
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 15520-41298 Invoice 03/14/2025 Batteries For Engines 0.00 675.94 15520-41396 Credit Memo 03/14/2025 CREDIT 0.00 -58.73
KEYEVID KEY EVIDENCE LOCK & SAFE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 639.64 72491 136157 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fix Back Door 0.00 639.64
KIMLEY-HOR KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 46,285.66 72492 29992597 Invoice 03/14/2025 KC Division St Striping 0.00 2,277.55 31062763 Invoice 03/14/2025 101 Broadway RAB PS&E 0.00 44,008.11 KC GLASS KING CITY GLASS SERVICES 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 75.73 72493 2499 Invoice 03/14/2025 Fix Broken Mirror On 8561 0.00 75.73 KC IND KING CITY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 57.90 72494 361934 Invoice 03/14/2025 Chemical Trailer Repair 0.00 34.50 362233 Invoice 03/14/2025 Black Trailer Repair 0.00 23.40 LINCOLN LINCOLN AQUATICS 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 1,871.87 72495 Q2030170 Invoice 03/14/2025 Chlorine 0.00 1,871.87
MEDICS MEDICS FOR LIFE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 1,440.00 72496 1554 Invoice 03/14/2025 CPR First Aid Certification 0.00 1,440.00 MONARCH IN MELDI LLC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 53,625.00 72497 031225 Invoice 03/14/2025 Monarch Inn Temporary Shelter 0.00 53,625.00 MO CO EMER MONTEREY COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 72,970.00 72498 FY 2024/25 Invoice 03/14/2025 County Comm 0.00 72,970.00 NEWSV NEW SV MEDIA INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 535.50 72499 136373 Invoice 03/14/2025 Riverbed Wildlife Prevention Plan City Cou… 0.00 535.50 ODP ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 60.12 72500 411708754001 Invoice 03/14/2025 Office Supplies for City Hall & Rec Coordin… 0.00 60.12 O'REILLY A O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 62.37 72501 3133-148383 Invoice 03/14/2025 Headlight Bulbs 0.00 20.22 3133-148491 Invoice 03/14/2025 ATO Fuse For Large Mower 0.00 5.75 3133-148511 Invoice 03/14/2025 Headlight Bulbs 0.00 36.40 PARTS & SE PARTS & SERVICE CTR- NAPA INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 580.25 72502 002035 Invoice 03/14/2025 Batteries For 8514 0.00 658.55 002054 Credit Memo 03/14/2025 CREDIT 0.00 -78.30
PETE'S TOW PDP INVESTMENTS INC PETES TOWING AND P & R TOWING 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 960.00 72503 57534 Invoice 03/14/2025 Evidence Tow 0.00 960.00
PURE WATER PENINSULA PURE WATER INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 97.95 72504 448922 Invoice 03/14/2025 Water Delivery Service 0.00 49.20 448923 Invoice 03/14/2025 Water 0.00 48.75
PAC PG&E 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 392.69 72505
022425 Invoice 03/14/2025 Electricity for Cameras 0.00 273.32 022625 Invoice 03/14/2025 Electricity 0.00 119.37
PBGFS PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 622.01 72506 3107080654 Invoice 03/14/2025 Lease for Postage Meter 0.00 186.50 3107110820 Invoice 03/14/2025 Postage Machine Lease 0.00 435.51 PURCHASE P PURCHASE POWER*PITNEY BOWES 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 1,054.00 72507 022125 Invoice 03/14/2025 Postage 0.00 1,054.00
RAZZOLINK RAZZO LINK INC RAZZOLINK 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 34.90 72508 421500 Invoice 03/14/2025 Website Maintenance 0.00 34.90 SL POWER SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 851.84 72509 Check Report Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 5 of 6
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 52721 Invoice 03/14/2025 Generator Maintenance 0.00 851.84 SENTRY SENTRY ALARM SYSTEMS 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 90.00 72510 2274942 Invoice 03/14/2025 Alarm System 0.00 90.00
SPEAK SPEAKWRITE BILLING DEPT 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 19.05 72511 cca2f946 Invoice 03/14/2025 Transcription Services 0.00 19.05 STALK STALKER RADAR Applied Concepts, Inc. 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 4,794.79 72512 452070 Invoice 03/14/2025 OTS Grant 0.00 4,794.79
STERI STERICYCLE INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 150.47 72513 8009890826 Invoice 03/14/2025 Stericycle 0.00 150.47
TEMP UNIF TEMPLETON UNIFORMS LLC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 202.28 72514 12018 Invoice 03/14/2025 Double Cuff, Radio Holder 0.00 202.28 T - MOBILE T-MOBILE USA, INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 150.00 72515 9594421244 Invoice 03/14/2025 Phone Investigation 0.00 150.00 TYLER TECH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 3,800.00 72516 025-500123 Invoice 03/14/2025 E-File of W2 & 1099 for 2024 Tax Season 0.00 2,000.00 025-500291 Invoice 03/14/2025 Conversion 0.00 1,800.00
VERIZON WI VERIZON WIRELESS 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 988.26 72517 6106144399 Invoice 03/14/2025 MDT's 0.00 988.26
WALLACEGR WALLACE GROUP A California Corporation 03/14/2025 Regular 0.00 786.25 72518 64298 Invoice 03/14/2025 Regulatory Compliance Jan 2025 0.00 786.25 Total Regular: 0.00 301,919.43
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code POOL-WFB Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
58 0
2 0
13 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
73 0.00
Payment
302,933.28

0.00 -1,013.85

0.00 240,302.81
542,222.24
Payable
Count
106
0 0
0 29
135
Check Report Date Range: 03/01/2025 - 03/15/2025
3/17/2025 8:34:07 AM Page 6 of 6
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
58 0
2 0
13 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
73 0.00
302,933.28

0.00 -1,013.85

0.00 240,302.81
542,222.24
106
0 0
0 29
135
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 Pooled Cash Fund 3/2025 542,222.24
542,222.24
Item No. 9(C)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE

APPOINTMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopt a Resolution: 1) reappointing Jeff Francis and Scott Prewitt to the Airport Advisory Committee; 2) reappointing Teri Storelli and Margarita Lopez to the Planning Commission.

BACKGROUND:

In 2016, the City Council established new staggered terms for each of the commissions, committees and boards. Terms expire on March 31st of odd numbered years. As a result, a number of commissioner terms are now expiring.

DISCUSSION:

The City has received applications from the following individuals to be reappointed:

Jeff Francis, Airport Advisory Committee
Scott Prewitt, Airport Advisory Committee
Tori Storelli, Planning Commission
Margarita Lopez, Planning Commission
Applications for all the recommended appointments are attached.

COST ANALYSIS:

There are no costs projected from this action.

CITY OF KING
APPLICATION King City FEB 1 0 2025
o. CITY OF KING

FOR APPOINTMENT TO

COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND BOARDS
Please print or type the following information:

Address:

Marne: James
PO Box
Francis
1108

King City, Ca 93930
Telephone (day): 831-320-8461 fax/e-mail (optional) [email protected] Commission/Committee/Board applying for: Airport advisory member Describe your interest in becoming a member of this commission/committee/board:

I have always been intrerested in what is happening at the airport.

Background relevant to this commission/committee/board:

Pilot, aircraft mechanic, have been working on the airport for 35 years. Have been on the advisory committee for years.

Other comments:
01-08-2025
Date Applicant’s Signature
RETURN TO: City Hall, 212 S. Vanderhurst Ave., King City. CA 93930 Ph (831) 386-5971 * Fx (831) 385-6887

Item No. 9 (D)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE SCHEDULE OF

ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION FINES
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution amending the City of King Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines.

BACKGROUND:

The Municipal Code sets forth that fine amounts for administrative citations shall be set forth in a schedule of fines established by City Council Resolution. The City’s Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines (“fine schedule”) was established in 2004 and has not been updated since. As a result, staff have been working on the process of drafting a new fine schedule to ensure it is accurate and can be easily updated on a regular basis in the future. As part of the process, the City Council adopted an Ordinance at the January 28, 2025 meeting requiring posting of the fine schedule on the City website to help ensure that the public has easy access to the fine amounts. A recommended updated fine schedule has been developed and is now being presented to City Council for consideration.

DISCUSSION:

Update of the fine schedule was labor intensive because many of the fines have been established and/or changed by Ordinances amending different sections of the Municipal Code regarding specific violations. However, this will now make it much easier to find fine amounts by providing them in one document, which has been formatted to be similar to the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The fine schedule includes relative Municipal Code sections and is organized by Title number.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE SCHEDULE OF

ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION FINES
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 3
Each of the City departments reviewed fines for violations within their operations.

Staff also reviewed each section of the Municipal Code identified in the fine schedule in order delete or update any changes made to the Municipal Code section corresponding to the fine listed since the fine schedule was created.

Most of the changes fall within fines administered by the Police Department.

Parking restriction fines were not included in the original fine schedule, along with several other violations. These have been added, and the City’s recommended parking fine amounts have been increased. This will enable the City to begin the parking enforcement program in the downtown area. Many of the other Police Department fine amounts are also proposed to be adjusted. The recommended amounts were determined based upon a comparison of other cities in South Monterey County. In addition to fines for Municipal Code violations, the section on Vehicles and Traffic includes proposed fines for State Vehicle Code regulations for which the City has authority to establish the fine amounts.

Please note that the City’s code enforcement program attempts to avoid citations as much as possible. They are only issued once multiple other attempts are made to seek voluntary compliance. Therefore, this action does not represent a change in that approach and will not result in an increase in more citations. The objective is simply to update the fine amounts since they have not been reviewed for over 20 years and to create a fine schedule that can be more easily accessed, reviewed and updated in the future.

COST ANALYSIS:

Given the limited number of citations that are issued by the City, the increase in revenues will be minor.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines is not a “project” for the purpose of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as they do not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change to the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. No further action is required under CEQA for City Council action.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:

1. Adopt the Resolution;

2. Modify and adopt the Resolution to change the recommended fine amounts;

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5031

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING

AMENDING A SCHEDULE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION FINES FOR VIOLATIONS OF

THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE WHEREAS, on December 9, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 known as the Administrative Remedies Ordinance, as set forth in Title 20 of the King City Municipal Code, which established administrative citation and administrative remedies processes for enforcing violations of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 1 of said Ordinance provides that an enforcement officer of the City of King charged with enforcement of the King City Municipal Code shall have the authority to issue administrative citations to any person responsible for violations of the King City Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City enforces violations of the State of California Vehicle Code which the City has authority to establish the fine amounts as long as they are as or more restrictive than established by the State; and
WHEREAS, Section 1 of said Ordinance states that the administrative fine amounts for code violations shall be set forth in a schedule of fines established by resolution of the City Council, which shall specify any increased fines for repeat violations of the same section within thirty-six (36) months; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 4023 on January 13, 2004 establishing the Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines to update fine amounts and include fines for missing code sections.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of King hereby approves the Schedule of Administrative Citation Fines attached and included herein as Exhibit A.

This resolution was passed and adopted this 25th day of March, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, Council Members:

NAYS, Council Members:

ABSENT, Council Members:

ABSTAIN, Council Members:

APPROVED:
______________________________
Mike LeBarre, Mayor
CC Resolution No.2025-5031

Page 2 of 2 ends

01222.0001/325812.1
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Roy Santos, City Attorney

Item No. 9 (E)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DOREEN LIBERTO, AICP, MDR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN REPORT AND
HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council review and accept the 2024 Annual General Plan Progress and Housing Element Annual Reports.

BACKGROUND:

California Government Code Section 65400(a) (2) requires an annual report on the status of the General Plan and the City's progress in its implementation, including progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. This annual General Plan Progress Report (Progress Report) is submitted to the City Council, the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD), and the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). This is an opportunity to review activities and projects of the prior year in the areas of development and other programs that work toward implementing the City's General Plan. The Annual Report is due to the State on April 1st.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the Progress Report is twofold. First, it informs the State of California of the City’s planning activities and assists in facilitating the legislative process as it pertains to land use and local planning issues. Second, the Progress Report serves to update the decision makers on progress toward the implementation of policies of the City of King General Plan and assists in formulating future implementation priorities.

The State of California requires each county and city to adopt a General Plan for long-term growth. The general plan consists of a statement of development

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN REPORT AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 4
policies and includes a map or maps and text setting forth goals and policies. It is a comprehensive long-term plan for the physical development of the county and city. In this sense, it is a "blueprint" for development.

The seven (7) State-mandated elements of the General Plan include:

1. Land Use

2. Circulation

3. Housing

4. Safety

5. Open Space

6. Noise

7. Conservation
The City of King’s General Plan consists of the mandated elements and an optional element called Economic Development. A comprehensive General Plan update occurred in 1998. Modifications to the land use, housing, safety, open space, and conservation elements were adopted by the City Council in 2016.

At the February 11, 2025 meeting, the City Council adopted the 2023-2031 King City Housing Element update (6th Cycle). It was subsequently submitted to and certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). According to HCD, "We are pleased to announce that the 2023-2031 (Cycle 6) Housing Element was officially adopted by the City Council on February 11, 2025 and certified by the State Housing and Community Development Department on February19, 2025. The City is in the process of updating the Land Use Element (LUE), and Safety Element . Exhibit 1 provides details related to the General Plan, which includes the Housing Element.

One important aspect of the Annual General Plan and Housing Element Progress Report is to track the number and type of permits processed by the City. This also includes the number of Code Enforcement cases. The following chart provides the number of planning and building permits submitted and the number of code enforcement cases processed for the years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. A further breakdown of the types of project is included in Table 1.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL GENERAL PLAN REPORT AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2024
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 3 OF 4
Table 1: Number of Projects (2020-2024)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Planning Permit
(including
Planning
Commission
Review)
23 26 41 10 54
Building Permit 117 88 122 67 117
Code
Enforcement
12 77 48 45 42
City Council
Review
6 3 4 7 10
COST ANALYSIS:

The cost associated with the Annual Progress Report includes staff time preparing and distributing it.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Review and accept the Report;

2. Amend and accept the Report;

EXHIBIT 1
2024 Annual Report on the General Plan and
2 EXHIBIT 1

CITY OF KING
City Council Planning Commission
Mike LeBarre, Mayor David Nuck, Chairperson
Carlos DeLeon, Mayor Pro Team David Mendez, Vice Chairperson Carlos Victoria Margarita Lopez
Robert Cullen Steve Wilson
Oscar Avalos Teri Storelli
City Administration
Steven Adams, City Manager
Erica Sonne, City Clerk
Roy Santos, City Attorney
Community Development Department
Doreen Liberto, AICP
Community Development
Director
Maricruz Aguilar,
Planner
Esmeralda Alvarez,
Planning Technician
Mark McClain, Building Official
Adriana Granados,
Administrative Assistant
Natalia Rios Gonzales,
Customer Service Assistant
3 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 3 of 23 ends

I. Introduction
A. Executive Summary ………………………………………………4
B. Background Information …………………………………………..4
C. Information Document (CEQA Review)………………………….5
D. Report Acceptance Date…………………………………………..5
II. Community Development Project
A. Planning Division..………………………………………………….6
B. Building Division.……………………………………………………7
C. Code Enforcement………………………………………………….8
III. General Plan Implementation, Projects and
Accomplishments
A. Land Use Element………………………………………………….9
B. Conservation, Open Space & Safety Element...………………….10 C. Circulation Element……………………………………………………10
D. Housing Element……………………………………………………11
E. Economic Development……………………………………………17
IV. Grants………………………………………………………………….19
V. Conclusion……………………………………………………………21
Appendix……………………………………………………………….22
• Appendix 1: 2024 Housing Element Annual Progress Report 4 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 4 of 23 ends

I. INTRODUCTION
A. Executive Summary
California Government Code Section 65400(a) (2) requires an annual report on the status of the General Plan and the City's progress in its implementation, including progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. (Charter Cities were required to start submitting the Annual Reports in April 2018.) The General Plan Annual Progress Report and Housing Element Annual Report are being submitted to the City Council, State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) and the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). This is an opportunity to review activities and projects of the prior year in the areas of development and other programs that work toward implementing the City's General Plan. This Report provides spreadsheets and Tables of the specific developments proposed and approved in the City during 2024. The City of King’s General Plan is a long range comprehensive plan that will control and regulate land uses and development in the City. The individual Elements (land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, design, and economic development) of this General Plan contain policies and programs that will guide future development in the City.

The City of King’s 2024 General Plan Annual Progress Report is prepared by the Community Development Department with input from various City Departments including Public Works, Fire, Police, Parks and Recreation. The report is intended to provide information on the measurable outcomes and actions associated with the implementation of all of the General Plan Elements. It also reviews the activities of the Community Development Department including the Planning and Building Divisions.

B. Background Information
King City is a major population center in the Salinas Valley, an important agricultural area. Framed by the Santa Lucia Range in the west and the Gabilán Range in the east, the land immediately surrounding King City is comprised of agricultural fields intersected by the Salinas River—the largest river system on California’s Central Coast. The river flows northwesterly from its headwaters in eastern San Luis Obispo County, 175 miles through the Salinas Valley, and into Monterey Bay north of the city of Marina. The river is an important wildlife corridor, provides irrigation for an immense agricultural industry, and is the main source for aquifer recharge in the valley.

Agriculture has been the region’s primary economic draw in the Central Salinas Valley. Ninety percent (90%) of the jobs in the unincorporated Central Salinas Valley are in the agricultural sector. Historically, King City was the commercial and industrial center for South Monterey County.

California State law establishes a framework for local planning procedures. The California Government Code (§65000 et seq.) establishes the laws pertaining to the regulation of land uses by all local governments including: the general plan 5 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 5 of 23 ends

requirement, specific plans, subdivisions, and zoning. The City of King is mandated by the State to conform to the California Government Code. (It should be noted that since the City is a Charter City, some provisions of the Government Code do not apply.) The City’s General Plan was comprehensively updated in 1998. Since its adoption (and subsequent amendments), the City has worked to implement the policies outlined in the General Plan. The various departments that make up the City of King work together to implement various aspects of the General Plan.

These departments include the City Manager's office, Parks and Recreation, Fire, Public Safety, Public Works, and Community Development. This report is organized to comply with OPR's General Plan Guidelines.

C. Information Document (CEQA Review)
This document is a reporting document and does not create or alter policy and therefore, not a project for the purpose of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

D. Report Acceptance Date
The 2024 General Plan Annual Progress Report will be reviewed by the City Council on March 25, 2025.
6 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 6 of 23 ends

II. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
A. Planning Division
The Planning Division maintains and implements the King City Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and prepares other specialized planning documents. The division reviews development requests for conformance with the City's planning policies and standards, and conducts environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The list below outlines the activities of the Planning Division from January 2024 through December 2024. The day-to-day planning activities include:
• Administrating the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Development Code) • Answering public inquiries on the telephone and over the public counter • Processing entitlement applications for the Planning Commission and City Council
• Reviewing and approving business license applications for zoning compliance
• Reviewing development plans for compliance with City standards (Plan Checks)
The Planning Division staffs the Planning Commission, which meets on the first and third Tuesday of the month. The Planning Commission conducts public hearings on all entitlements, including new commercial and multi-family residential buildings, conditionally permitted uses, variances and similar land use requests. On legislative items such as General Plan Amendments (GPA), Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Changes, the Planning Commission acts as an advisory body to the City Council. The City Council makes the final decisions on legislative items. Tables 1 and 2 list the number of projects reviewed by the Planning staff, Planning Commission and City Council.

Table 1: Planning Permits, Including Planning Commission Review (2020 – 2024) Permit Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Conditional Use Permit * 2 3 4 4 1
Conditional Use Permit
Amendment/Revisions
(including cannabis) *
2 4 4
0 2
Tentative Tract/Parcel Maps * 0 1 2 1 0
Lot Line Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0
Lot Merger 0 0 0 0 0
General Plan Amendment * 0 1 1 0 0
Rezone/Zone Change/Zone
Text Amendment Ordinances *
1 1 1
2 4
Architectural Review * 1 1 5 1 2
7 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 7 of 23 ends

Permit Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Specific Plan Amendment * 1 0 0 0 0
Misc. (e.g., Home Occupation
Permits ,Environmental
Review, Plot Plan Reviews,
Landscaping Plans, Pre-app
Reviews, Sign Permits,
Temporary, Mural Permits,
Variances, Operation Permits)
16 15 24 1 45
TOTAL: 23 26 41 10 54
*Planning Commission Review
Table 2: City Council Review By Application Type
(2018 – 2022)
Permit Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
General Plan Amendment 0 1 1 0 0
Rezone/Zone Change/Zone
Text Amendments
1 1 1 1 3
Ordinances (excluding zone
changes)
5 1 1 6 7
Appeals 0 0 1 0 0
TOTAL: 6 3 4 7 10
B. Building Division
The Building Division is responsible for a variety of tasks that include issuing permits, processing plan check submittals, and inspections. The Building and Safety Division reviews all plans and permits for compliance with Building regulations.

In 2024,theBuildingDivision processed 117 permitapplications. These applications include all construction related projects and installation of mechanical and utility equipment. Also, there were a total of 37 new single family residential dwellings submitted for plan check in 2024. In 2024, there were a total of 14 new ADU plan check submittals. Table 3 provides a breakdown of building permits from 2020 to 2024.

Table 3: Building Permits (2020-2024)
Permit Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
New Single-Family Dwellings 51 24 48 25 37
Carriage Units 0 6 4 1 2
8 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 8 of 23 ends

Permit Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Tenant Improvements 5 1 2 2 1
Commercial Remodels/Additions 4 4 2 0 3
Single Family Residential
Remodels/Additions
1 7 1 1 3
Roof-Mounted Solar Panels
(Commercial & Residential)
51 44 61 32 55
Multi-Family New Projects 0 1 0 0 0
Multi-Family Remodel Projects 1 0 0 0 1
Industrial New Construction Issued
Permits
1 0 0 0 0
Industrial Remodel Projects 3 1 4 0 0
ADU (Detached) 2 5
ADU (Garage Conversions) 4 9
ADU (Attached) 0 0
Junior ADU 0 1
Other 0 1
1 0
TOTAL 117 88 122 67 117
C. Code Enforcement
The Code Enforcement Committee, which consists of staff members from Police Department, Fire Department, City Administration and Community Development Department, is responsible for enforcing the King City Municipal Code that relate to residential and business property maintenance standards, including business licensing. Code Enforcement also enforces building, health and safety standards related to environmental protection and neighborhood preservation. Code Enforcement activity for the year of 2024 involved 42 cases for various property violations (e.g., commercial, residential, public street, park and recreational).

Table 4 provides the number of code enforcement cases from 2020 to 2024.

Table 4: Code Enforcement Cases By Application Type (2020 – 2024)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
12 77 48 45 42
9 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 9 of 23 ends

III. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION, PROJECTS AND

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The Annual General Plan Progress Report discusses specific projects and policies that demonstrate the implementation of the goals outlined in the General Plan.

A. Land Use Element
The Land Use Element (LUE) establishes the type and density of land uses and guides growth and development by presenting a plan that reflects the community's desire to maintain and enhance an enjoyable, balanced quality of life. The City's Land Use Map identifies specified land use areas, including Agriculture, Residential, Commercial, industrial and Open Space/Recreation.

The City updated the LUE in 2016 and is currently in the process of updating it again to incorporate State housing policies and the City’s future land use patterns.

The City has implemented many of the Goals, Policies and Programs in the updated 2016
Land Use Element, as listed below.

1. Objective 7.1.3: Continue to develop and adequately maintain a coordinate system of parks and recreational facilities in the city.

Accomplishments:
a. The Central Community Park in Mills Ranch was open in December 2024. It contains a soccer field, basketball courts, playground, pickleball courts and picnic area.
b. The City obtain $3.5 m. from AHSC grant via the CHISPA affordable housing project in Mills Ranch to install bicycle trails/multi-use trails from Mills Ranch to the future MMTC via Metz Road and Second Street. c. City staff continues to work on the Plaza Park, which will include a performance stage with gazebo, open lawn areas, children’s play elements, a promenade, interactive public art pieces, restroom, park, parking lot, landscaping, and lighting.

2. Program No. 4.1.1.1: The City shall encourage development of new businesses that will offer year-round employment in order to reduce the seasonal unemployment that is characteristic of the current local employment.

Accomplishment:
a. The City continues to collaborate with Laurence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) on future carbon capture and storage opportunities. This includes establishing relationships with potential businesses that could be located in King City.

3. Objective 8.1: Build an efficient, multi-modal transit center (MMTC) surrounded by mixed use developments to improve the quality of life, support economic vitality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

4. Policy 8.1.1: The City shall collaborate with federal, state and regional governments. Fort Hunter Liggett, Union Pacific and other involved entities to locate funding for the design and construction of the MMTC. 10 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 10 of 23 ends

Accomplishments:
a. The City continues to collaborate on the design and engineering plans with Union Pacific (UP).

5. Program No. 8.1.1.2: The City shall pursue available revenues to fund the multimodal transit center (MMTC).

Accomplishment:
a. The City has approximately $53 ml in funding for Phase 1 of the MMTC.

In early 2025, the City applied for an additional $25 ml from the BUILD Grant.

B. Conservation, Open Space & Safety Element
The City amended the conservation, open space and safety elements in 2016, and combined the three (3) elements. Updates and amendments to these elements were primarily to make corrections and ensure consistency with the updated housing and land use elements. The open space, conservation and safety elements incorporates goals, policies and programs that protect residents from flooding hazards by updating flood maps that incorporate the most recent Federal Emergency Management Agency flood mapping.

Amendments also recommend the development of a proposed MMTC near First Street. The changes will help provide better housing, reducing vehicular trips, reducing energy consumption, reducing use of fossil fuels and improving air quality.

1. Hazard Prevention Goal COS-12: Reduce the risks from fire hazards, hazardous materials and seismic events to an acceptable level.

Accomplishment:
a. The City applied for and received a $214,000 Cal Fire Wildfire Prevention Plan grant to prepare a Riverbed Wildfire Prevention Plan (RWPP). The RWPP provided a range of programs to reduce the risk of fires. Two Community Meetings were conducted in 2024 and the final draft was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in early 2025.

C. Circulation Element
The circulation element provides goals, objectives and policies to service future transportation needs. One goal is to provide an integrated transportation system to adequately serve residential, commercial, industrial and recreation uses. The City has been working with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) and applying for funding for the proposed multi-modal transit center and installation of bike lanes.

1. Policy 1.4: The City shall coordinate its transportation planning efforts with TAMC and Caltrans. City staff shall attend TAMC technical meetings as needed and shall maintain regular contact with state and regional transportation planning officials.
11 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 11 of 23 ends

Accomplishment:
a. City staff regularly meets with and talks to TAMC, Caltrans and other transportation related officials to communicate the city’s transportation needs.
b. The City designed a roundabout to eliminate the only traffic signal in the town. The design is near 100%. An encroachment permit has been applied for with Caltrans. It is anticipated that construction will begin in 2025.

2. Goal No. 3: To provide a Public Street and Highway System that accommodates Existing and Project Traffic Volumes within the Planning Area.

3. Goal No. 7: To Provide a System of Hiking and Equestrian Trails that Promote the Recreation Potential of the City’s Parks and Open Space Areas.

Accomplishment:
a. The City has received an $11 million grant for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for the San Antonio Drive bike path and pedestrian path and educational program. The City received funding to begin planning and installing multi-use trails throughout the City. The San Antonio bike path connects the Arboleda Linear Park at San Antonio Road and Mildred Street and goes down San Antonio Road and Broadway Street, ending at the high school.

D. Housing Element
The Housing Element establishes housing objectives, policies and programs in response to community housing conditions and needs. Some of the goals and policies met during 2024 are identified below. (Note that the 6th Cycle Housing Element was approved by HCD in February 2025.)

1. Goal 1 Housing Availability and Services: Provide New Housing Units accessible to all members of the community in accordance with the regional fair share housing goals.
a. Policy 1.1: Encourage the development of range of housing types and prices to facility housing production commensurate with the city’s regional share and address the city’s job-based housing demand.

Accomplishments:

Program 6 to Allow Mobile Homes: A draft ordinance has been prepared to amend the zoning ordinance Title 17 to allow mobile and manufactured homes in residential zones.

2. Goal 2 Housing and Neighborhood Conservation: Preserve and rehabilitate the existing housing stock to meet health and safety requirements and to improve the quality of life of residents. a. Policy 2.1: Continue to monitor and enforce building and property maintenance code standards in residential neighborhoods.

Accomplishments:

Program 7 Enhance Code Enforcement: The City continues to have monthly Code Enforcement staff meetings. The group is composed 12 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 12 of 23 ends

of Police, Fire, Building and Planning staff. The City also has a Citizen Code Enforcement Committee composed of local residents whose focus is to identify substandard areas in the city with the goal to improve the quality of life of residents. Ongoing monitoring of substandard housing continues to be a top priority for the Code Enforcement Committee.
b. Policy 2.2: Encourage the rehabilitation of housing in despair and demolition of units that are substandard and beyond repair as a means to help improve the neighborhoods.

Accomplishments:

In 2024, two (2) single family dwellings were identified as substandard and are current open code enforcement cases. One multifamily complex was identified in 2022 and case was closed in 2024.

3. Goal 3 Special Housing Needs: Meet the housing needs of special groups of City residents, including the growing farmworker and senior populations, large families, single mothers, homeless and the disabled.

Accomplishments:

Program 8 Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types: A draft ordinance has been prepared to amend the zoning ordinance Title 17 to allow or the following:
• Permanent Supportive Housing to be a by-right use in all zones where multifamily and mixed-uses are permitted.
• Transitional and Supportive Housing in zones that allow for residential uses.
• Low Barrier Navigation Centers to be a by-right use in zones where multifamily and mixed-uses are permitted, including the nonresidential zones where multifamily is permitted. • Amend the definition of Emergency Shelter to include other interim interventions, including, but not limited to, a navigation center, bridge housing, and respite or
recuperative care.
• Amend the parking standards for emergency shelters to require no more than sufficient parking to accommodate all staff working in the shelter.
• Single-room occupancy units. To clarify which zones will allow for single-room occupancy (SRO) units with
appropriate development standards.
• Residential Care Facilities. Define and allow residential care facilities for six or fewer persons, and residential care facilities regardless of size, in all zones that permit residential uses of the same type.
• Farmworker Employee Housing. Amend the zoning code to clarify that farmworker housing is permitted by right, without 13 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 13 of 23 ends

a conditional use permit, in single-family zones for six or fewer persons and in zones allowing agricultural uses with no more than 12 units or 36 beds consistent with Health and Safety Codes Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6.
• Density Bonus. Review and revise the City’s Zoning Code to ensure consistency with State Density Bonus Law.

4. Goal 4 Fair and Equal Housing Opportunity: Ensure fair and equal housing opportunity for all, regardless of race age, marital status, ethnicity, sex, religion, household type, or other protected status or special needs households.

Accomplishment:

Program 10 Reasonable Accommodation: A draft ordinance has been prepared to amend the zoning ordinance Title 17 to establish a reasonable accommodation procedure that does not require a CUP or variance to assist people with disabilities by ensuring equal access to housing.

The State Annual Housing Element requires the City provide a status update on Programs and Objectives. Table 5 provides a summary of the Housing Element implementation.

Table 5: Housing Element Implementation
14 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 14 of 23 ends

15 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 15 of 23 ends

16 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 16 of 23 ends

17 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 17 of 23 ends

E. Economic Development Element
The purpose of the Economic Development Element is to identify current economic development conditions and to demonstrate how the land use plan will promote business activity and employment growth within the City consistent with the priorities identified by City leaders and the community. The Economic Development Element establishes goals and policies to promote fiscal stability, expand the City’s employment base, and enhance the City’s revenues in order to provide quality services to the community. These goals and policies provide for the implementation of the City of King’s vision as a regional economic job center and commercial hub. The Economic Development Element was updated and approved by the City Council on January 25, 2022.

1. Policy 1.4: Continue to find financial support for the ultimate buildout of the Multi-Modal Transit Center located in the proximity of Pearl Street and First Street.

Accomplishment:
a. The City has approximately $53 ml in funding for Phase 1 of the MMTC.

In early 2025, the City applied for an additional $25 ml from the BUILD Grant.

2. Policy 1.5: Undertake strategies to attract new and retain existing commercial uses and a broad range of housing developments.

Accomplishments:
a. The City has been working closely with the Monterey County Business Council on potential commercial and hotel developments. A Retail Market Assessment was prepared by Kosmont Company to assess how to attract retail uses.
b. The City continues to collaborate with Laurence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) on future carbon capture and storage opportunities. This includes establishing relationships with potential businesses that could be located in King City.

3. Action Item 2.1.04: Increase and market properties with prime freeway access and visibility to chain retail businesses to expand shopping opportunities and decrease loss of sales tax to outside areas. 18 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 18 of 23 ends

Accomplishments:
a. The City continues to work with the property owners of 40-acres adjacent to Highway 101 and First Street to identify the appropriate land uses for development of mixed use housing and commercial development.
b. The City continues to work with StayCal to locate a hotel off of Broadway Street (APN: 026-391-028-000), which will be adjacent to the recently constructed Dutch Bros and future Grocery Outlet Store.
19 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 19 of 23 ends

IV. Grants
The City has been working on several grants to generate housing and promote a livable community. The grants are highlighted in Table 6.

Table 6: Grants
Grant
Funding
Purpose Status Grant Amount
Cal Fire
Wildfire
Grant
The Project will focus on protecting
King City, the adjacent communities,
including the Pine Canyon, structures
(e.g., houses), infrastructure, and the
Salinas River and San Lorenzo Creek
corridor. This Plan will address
innovative nature-based solutions to
reduce disasters caused by climate
change, such as drought, wildfires,
recharge groundwater, and pollution
control.

Approved $224,000
SB 1 Phase 1 of MMTC. Engineer and
design of temporary platform.

During 2022, the City conducted a
stakeholder’s meeting to collaborate
on funding, submitted draft
engineering plans to Union Pacific,
worked with Amtrak to establish an
estimated timeframe to provide
passenger service in King City and
submitted an ITIP grant to help fund
the accelerated rail
platform.
$1,475,000.00
SB 2 Update
LUE/Prepare ADU Ordinance
$160,000.00
LEAP Update Housing Element Approved $65,000.00
REAP Update various General Plan policies
related to
attracting housing.

Approved $65,000.00
PHLA Various Housing Projects, including
providing housing,
including rapid rehousing.

Approved $134,000/year.$805,000/
5 yrs.

LHLA Regional Housing Trusts. Work with
the County and other cities to support a
regional housing trust.

County discussing applying and
leading the effort on this funding
source.

City’s portion presently
unknown.

Prop. 68 Construction of the Plaza Park at 332
Broadway
City received funding and a
contractor has been selected, as of
$2,135,000
20 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 20 of 23 ends

Grant
Funding
Purpose Status Grant Amount
2023.

City
Façade
Grant
Staff is working with
businesses/property owners within the
Historic Downtown on providing grants
Ongoing process City awards a $12,500
grant for façade
improvements and
$2,500 for business
signs.

Airport
Improvem
ent
Program
Federal grant program for
improvements to public-use airports
Approved to Rehabilitate Taxiway $355,500
21 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 21 of 23 ends

V. Conclusion
The General Plan Progress Report and Annual Housing Element Report illustrates activities undertaken by the City of King in 2024 that worked toward implementing the City's General Plan. The City has worked to progressively implement the policies outlined in each element of the City's guiding planning document as outlined in the various sections of this Progress Report. The General Plan represents the community's collective vision for preserving and improving the quality of life in the City. As noted by the accomplishments set forth in this document over the course of 2024, the City has implemented many of the collective goals and policies identified in the General Plan. The ideas, proposals and suggestions that have come to the City have all furthered the City's goal to preserve important local resources, improve the local economy, provide a variety of housing and improve the quality of life for the community. 22 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 22 of 23 ends

23 CITY OF KING
2024 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT/HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL REPORT MARCH 25, 2025

Page 23 of 23 ends

Jurisdiction King City ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Planning
Period 6th Cycle 12/15/2023 - 12/15/2031
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Project Type Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12 13
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total

PROPOSED
Units by
Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by
project
Total

DISAPPROVE
D Units by
Project
Please select
state
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.

Did the
housing
development
application
seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915?
Were
incentives or
concessions
requested
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915
approved?
Please
indicate the
status of the
application.

Is the project
considered a
ministerial
project or
discretionary
project?
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 11 0 026-461-001-
000 236 Rio Vista Dr Single Family B24-000015 SFD O8/13/2024 1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-602-024-
000 1307 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
Attached ADU B23-000265
ADU O
1/3/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-052-019-
000 209 Canal St Garage Conversion ADU B23-000266 ADU O1/17/2024 1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-211-032-
000
545 S
Vanderhurst
Ave
Garage Conversion
to ADU B23-000285
ADU O
1/24/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-472-012-
000
602 N
Vanderhurst
Ave
Garage Converson
to ADU B24-000022
ADU R
3/27/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-602-025-
000 1311 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
to ADU B24-000049
ADU O
6/27/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-602-030-
000 1312 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
+ addition B24-000090
ADU O
6/11/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-106-014-
000 306 7th Street Garage Conversion
+ addition B24-000123
ADU R
9/16/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-602-043-
000 231 Oxford Ave Garage Conversion B24-000135 ADU O7/8/2024 1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-186-015-
000 513 N Third St Garage Conversion B24-000174 ADU R9/5/2024 1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
026-082-201-
000
330 Patterson
St JADU B24-000040 ADU R6/12/2024
1 1 1 0 NONE No N/A Approved Ministerial
Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bonus Law Applications
10 Housing Development Applications Submitted
APPENDIX 1
Jurisdiction King City ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning
Period 6th Cycle 12/15/2023 - 12/15/2031
Table A2
2 3 5 6 8 9
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units
issued
Entitlements
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Building
Permits Date
Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 59 63 026-461-001-000 236 Rio Vista Dr Single Family
Dwelling B24-000015 SFD O 0 1 8/14/2024 1
026-602-024-000 1307 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
Attached ADU B23-000265 ADU O 0 1 1/24/2024 1
026-052-019-000 209 Canal St Garage Conversion
ADU B23-000266 ADU O 0 1 2/7/2024 1
026-211-032-000 545 S Vanderhurst
Ave
Garage Conversion
to ADU B23-000285 ADU O 0 1 2/8/2024 1
026-472-0120-000 602 N Vanderhurst
Ave B24-000022 B23-000144 ADU R 0 1 4/17/2024 1
026-602-025-000 1311 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
to ADU B24-000049 ADU O 0 1 6/25/2024 1
026-602-030-000 1312 Sussex Ct Garage Conversion
+ addition B24-000090 ADU O 0 1 6/18/2024 1
026-106-014-000 306 7th Street Garage Conversion
+ addition B24-000123 ADU R 0 1 9/16/2024 1
026-602-043-000 231 Oxford Ave Garage Conversion B24-000135 ADU O 0 1 7/16/2024 1 026-186-015-000 513 N Third St Garage Conversion B24-000174 ADU R 0 1 9/16/2024 1 026-082-201-000 330 Patterson St JADU B24-000040 ADU R 0 1 7/15/2024 1 026-101-015-000 301 Seventh St ADU B22-000242 ADU R 0 1 4/18/2023 1 026-561-020-000 260 Oxford Ave Garage Conversion
to ADU B23-000101 ADU O 0 1 7/27/2023 1
026-601-027-000 1396 CAMBRIDGE
Ave ADU B23-000017 ADU O 0 1 3/8/2023 1
026-551-025-000 710 Sandringham
St ADU B23-000123 ADU O 0 1 8/1/2023 1
026-591-060-000 1315 Cambridge
Ave ADU B23-000102 ADU O 0 1 8/16/2023 1
026-651-025-000 676 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000281 SFD O 0 1 11/21/2023 1
026-651-025-000 676 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000280 ADU R 0 1 11/21/2023 1
026-651-026-000 678 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000279 SFD O 0 1 11/28/2023 1
026-642-021-000 754 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000202 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2023 1
026-642-022-000 758 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000203 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2023 1
026-642-023-000 762 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000207 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2023 1
026-642-024-000 766 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000209 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2023 1
026-642-002-000 748 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000308 SFD O 0 1 10/2/2023 1
026-642-001-000 740 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000310 SFD O 0 1 10/12/2023 1
026-642-042-000 170 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000191 SFD O 0 1 10/11/2023 1
026-642-043-000 186 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000190 SFD O 0 1 10/10/2023 1
026-642-020-000 750 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000200 SFD O 0 1 10/10/2023 1
026-642-019-000 742 Brandywine
lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000205 SFD O 0 1 10/10/2023 1
026-651-024-000 674 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000278 SFD O 0 1 8/8/2023 1
026-642-005-000 772 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000302 SFD O 0 1 8/8/2023 1
026-642-004-000 764 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000304 SFD O 0 1 8/8/2023 1
026-642-003-000 756 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000306 SFD O 0 1 8/8/2023 1
026-642-007-000 788 Spreckels Rd Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B22-000315 SFD O 0 1 8/8/2023 1
026-651-023-000 672 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000277 SFD O 0 1 8/7/2023 1
026-651-022-000 670 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B22-000276 SFD O 0 1 6/7/2023 1
026-071-083-000 313 Mustang Ct ADU B23-000162 ADU O 0 1 10/11/2023 1 026-051-016-000 710 Bassett St ADU B23-000188 ADU R 0 1 10/25/2023 1 026-242-023-000 325 Haven Dr ADU B23-000185 ADU O 0 1 11/29/2023 1 026-561-026-000 224 Oxford Ave ADU B23-000195 ADU R 0 1 11/29/2023 1 026-651-028-000 682 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B23-000289 ADU R 0 1 3/6/2024 1
026-651-028-000 682 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B23-000290 SFD O 0 1 3/6/2024 1
026-651-035-000 696 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000114 SFD O 0 1 8/23/2024 1
026-651-035-000 696 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000113 ADU R 0 1 8/23/2024 1
026-651-033-000 692 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000118 SFD O 0 1 7/10/2024 1
026-651-033-000 692 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000117 ADU R 0 1 7/10/2024 1
026-651-043-000 712 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000282 SFD O 0 1 12/10/2024 1
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 4 7
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without
Financial Assistance or
Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy
or other
forms of
readiness
How many of
the units
were
Extremely
Low Income?
Please select the
state
streamlining
provision the
project was

APPROVED
pursuant to.
(may select
multiple)
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined the
units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable in
perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destro
yed Units
Demolished
or Destroyed
Units
Demolished/
Destroyed
Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus
Applied to the Project
(Percentage Increase in
Total Allowable Units or
Total Maximum
Allowable Residential
Gross Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given
to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project
receive a reduction or
waiver of parking
standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
0 0 2 0 0 0 56 58 0 1
0 0 NONE Y
1 4/10/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 4/29/2024 1 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y
1 7/29/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 9/16/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 9/24/2024 1 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y JADU
1 2/7/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 3/15/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/8/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 10/30/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 3/25/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 5/22/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 5/22/2024 1 0 NONE Y Other INC 55 carriage unit
1 5/23/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/4/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 5/29/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/5/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/5/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 3/11/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 3/12/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/17/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 4/25/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/13/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 5/8/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/17/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/23/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 2/1/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 2/26/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/23/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/17/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 1/17/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 4/10/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 4/26/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 10/1/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 6/14/2024 1 0 NONE Y
1 7/30/2024 1 0 NONE Y Other INC 55 CARRIAGE UNIT
1 7/30/2024 1 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y Other INC 55 carriage unit
0 0 NONE Y
0 0 NONE Y Other INC 55
0 0 NONE Y
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy Density Bonus 10 Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units
Jurisdiction King City ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2024
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning
Period 6th Cycle 12/15/2023 - 12/15/2031
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
026-651-043-000 712 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000281 ADU
R
0 1 12/10/20241
026-651-041-000 708 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000284 SFD
O
0 1 12/11/20241
026-642-032-000 791 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000278 SFD
O
0 1 3/15/20241
026-642-033-000 783 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000280 SFD
O
0 1 4/24/20241
026-651-030-000 686 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000080 SFD
O
0 1 4/30/20241
026-651-036-000 698 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000201 SFD
O
0 1 9/16/20241
026-651-034-000 694 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000115 SFD
O
0 1 8/23/20241
026-642-027-000 778 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000215 SFD
O
0 1 2/6/20241
026-651-039-000 704 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000197 SFD
O
0 1 9/16/20241
026-642-040-000 755 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000056 SFD
O
0 1 6/24/20241
026-642-035-000 775 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000031 SFD
O
0 1 4/24/20241
026-643-013-000 105 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000266 SFD
O
0 1 12/4/20241
026-642-028-000 782 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000216 SFD
O
0 1 2/7/20241
026-651-027-000 680 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B23-000291 SFD
O
0 1 3/6/20241
026-642-029-000 790 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000218 SFD
O
0 1 3/15/20241
026-643-010-000 129 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000282 SFD
O
0 1 12/3/20241
026-642-041-000 751 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000282 SFD
O
0 1 7/2/20241
026-643-002-000 118 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000218 SFD
O
0 1 10/1/20241
026-642-030-000 798 Brandywine
Lame
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000220 SFD
O
0 1 3/15/20241
026-643-005-000 154 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000222 SFD
O
0 1 10/1/20241
026-642-025-000 770 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000212 SFD
O
0 1 2/7/20241
026-651-037-000 700 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000200 SFD
O
0 1 9/16/20241
026-651-038-000 702 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000199 SFD
O
0 1 9/6/20241
026-651-042-000 710 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000283 SFD
O
0 1 12/10/20241
026-642-036-000 771 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000033 SFD
O
0 1 4/24/20241
026-651-046-000 718 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000276 SFD
O
0 1 12/4/20241
026-642-031-000 797 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000276 SFD
O
0 1 3/15/20241
026-651-031-000 688 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000079 SFD
O
0 1 4/30/20241
026-651-029-000 684 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000288 SFD
O
0 1 3/7/20241
026-642-034-000 779 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000029 SFD
O
0 1 4/24/20241
026-643-007-000 153 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000260 SFD
O
0 1 11/19/20241
026-642-026-000 774 Brandywine
Lane
Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B23-000213 SFD
O
0 1 2/7/20241
026-642-039-000 759 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000054 SFD
O
0 1 6/24/20241
026-643-003-000 130 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000219 SFD
O
0 1 10/16/20241
026-643-006-000 161 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000259 SFD
O
0 1 11/19/20241
026-643-008-000 145 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000261 SFD
O
0 1 11/19/20241
026-651-040-000 706 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000286 SFD
O
0 1 12/11/20241
026-642-037-000 767 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000035 SFD
O
0 1 6/24/20241
026-642-038-000 763 Roma Way Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000052 SFD
O
0 1 6/24/20241
026-643-001-000 106 Boston Lane Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000216 SFD
O
0 1 10/2/20241
026-643-011-000 121 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000264 SFD
O
0 1 12/3/20241
026-643-012-000 113 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000265 SFD
O
0 1 12/3/20241
026-643-009-000 137 Brunia Place Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000262 SFD
O
0 1 11/19/20241
026-651-032-000 690 Bikle Dr Arboleda Specific
Plan B24-000119 SFD
O
0 1 7/3/20241
026-643-004-000 142 Boston Ln Mills Ranch Specific
Plan B24-000220 SFD
O
0 1 10/1/20241
026-165-003-000 210 S Russ SFD B22-000031 SFDO01 8/26/20221 026-082-201-000 330 Patterson St ADU KCB-210-033 ADU
O01 7/7/20211
026-543-013-000 408 Willow Ct ADU B22-000177 ADUO01 10/27/20221 0 0 NONEY Other INC 55
00 NONEY
1 9/30/20241 NONEY
1 10/11/2024
1 NONEY
1 10/24/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 7/30/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 12/10/20241 NONEY
1 10/18/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 7/11/20241 NONEY
1 8/15/20241 NONEY
1 8/23/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 12/10/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 8/23/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 7/10/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONE
Y
0 NONEY
1 11/22/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 8/28/20241 NONEY
1 10/28/20241 NONEY
1 8/15/20241 NONEY
1 10/11/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 7/10/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 11/22/20241 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
0 NONEY
1 6/13/20241 NONEY1 DemolishedO Rebuilt House
1 5/3/20241 NONEY
1 11/27/20241 NONEY
Jurisdiction King City ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 12/15/2023 - 12/15/2031
1 Projection
Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
06/30/2023-
12/14/2023
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Total Units to
Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by
Income Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted 1 - 4 - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Above Moderate 364 29 - 59 - - - - - - - 88 276
702
30 - 63 - - - - - - - 93 609
5 6 7
Extremely lowIncome Need 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Units to Date
Total Units
Remaining
49 - - - - - - - - - - 49
VLI Deed Restricted
VLI Non Deed Restricted
LI Deed Restricted
LI Non Deed Restricted
MI Deed Restricted
MI Non Deed Restricted
Above Mod Income
Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 178
-
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs. - Moderate
97 63
178
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 5 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
97 58
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Extremely Low-Income Units*
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). *Extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten.

Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).

Please Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data.

Jurisdiction King City
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation Program 1: Emphasize Infill Development
Encourage the development of underutilized parcels in City Limits. Continue In 2020 the City began discussing with residents, including surveys to evaluate support for opportunity zones in the downtown core, allowing increased density, height, and intensity on underutilized sites such as aging motor hotels. In 2023 the City purchased fire equipment sufficient to reach four stories.

Program 2: Provide Future Sites for Residential Growth
Coordinate with stakeholders Continue The potential for new development was focused on three Opportunity Zones west and east Broadway St and the intersection of First Street and US 101.

Program 3: Provide Future Housing Sites for Low Income Residents Expand potential locations for Agricultural working housing Continue Dual use allowed in FSC Zone, facilitating temporary Agricultural Worker Quarters. In 2016 the City approved temporarily 214 beds of barrack style housing for seasonal employee H2A farmworkers. In 2018 the City approved an amendment to increase the number of beds to 364.

Program 4: Partner with Development Community to Create Affordable Housing Identify and maintain regular contact with potential Affordable and Agricultural working housing developers. Identify potential applicable programs
Continue
The City worked with a developer who specializes in permanent restorative housing and housing for seniors and persons of lower income. Two sites (Ausonio and Days Inn) have been identified one is under construction, the other is being reviewed in concept.

Program 5: Reduce Barriers to Creating MultiFamily Housing Review current Land Use and Zoning Designations for restrictions to and opportunities for multi-family use with the purpose of broadening and facilitating opportunities for annexation.

Cycle 5
This review was conducted as a part of the basis for Opportunity Area concept. Survey results and evolving Opportunity Areas concepts were presented to the Planning Commission in 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023.

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583 Program 6: Promote
Housing Choice Voucher Program
Increase the number of units that are available under the Housing Choice Voucher Program. Promote understanding of the County's Housing Choice Voucher Program and include information on the website and newsletter.

Delete and refer to County Program (Displacement Prevention) Residents were directed to access the County's voucher porgram.

Program 7: Allow Mobile Homes
Review zoning code and general plan for hindrances including mobile/manufactured dwellings in Single Family Residential districts and amend Code as directed Incorporate into Program 6 (Allow Mobile Home)
While the City currenlty implements mobile homes as required by State Law, the Zoning Code must be updated to reflect this practice. A draft ordinance is in progress.

Program 8: Enhance Code Enforcement
Provide community with building permit process information and ways to remedy code violations. Respond to residents who note pontential violations in their neighborhoods.

Ongoing
City established a Code Enforcement Committee and hired a Code Enforcement Officer in 2020 to address code violations. The Committee meets monthly and includes staff members from Police, Fire, Building, Community Development and City Manager departments. City established a Citizen Advisory Code Enforcement Committee that helps guide code enforcement goals and priorities for each year. The Citizen Advisory group meets quarterly.

Program 9: Provide Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Implement a Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program.

Delete and refer to active programs in the County
The City did not implement this program but relies on Monterey County to provide resources to assist with the rehabilitation of rental units.

Program 10: Agricultural Employee Housing
Facilitate the approval process and identify potential funding for Agricultural Employee Housing projects. Amend the zoning ordinance to ensure compliance with Health & Safety Code 17021.5 and 17021.6 Delete and Merge with New Program 10
City amended the FSC and C-2 Zoning District to allow Farmworker Housing approving a 364 bed facility for a period of 10 years. A Dual Land Use Designation Ordinance was adopted in 2018 to establish standards to ensure adequate and safe living conditions of seasonal employee housing. The Dowtown Addition Specific Plan was revised to allow Agricultural Employeee Housing, increasing density and resulting in approvals of 118 units, 55 under Phase 1 constructed.

Program 11: Group Home Program
Permit residential care facilities in appropriate zones as required by State law Delete. Merge with new Program 10
Sun Street facility with accomodations for 30 persons was permitted in 2018 and opened for occupancy in 2018.

Program 12: Fair Housing Program
Provide fair housing information to tenants and landlords at regular intervals Continue program. Modified into Program 9.

The City maintains this information on the City's website in addition to ECHO.

Providing on-site efforts in the City on a monthly basis.

Program 13: Reasonable Accomodation Ordinance
Ensure Reasobale Accomodation Procedures in City review and approval of accomodations for persons with disabilities Continue action, modified into Program 10.

The City reviewed the current procedures and is preparing recommendations to present to the Planning Commission and City Council.

Program 14: Universal
Design
Provide homes in new developments that are capable of accomodating residents throughout life as their physical cababilities change. Identify barriers to universal design and potential solutions to participate in. Present concepts/program to Planning Commission. Document research and discuss updates sem-annually.

Continue, modified to Program 11.

City worked with developers to provide a wide range of housing types to accommodate people with different abilities. An example of this is the Rava Farmworker Employee Housing and the King's Station Affordbale Housing Complex which provides units for disabled individuals, senior citizens and families.

Program 15: Efficient Land Use
Identify and adopt policies to be included in ongoing Genearl Plan Updates that define and implement efficient use of land. Present policies to Planning Commission.

Continue, modified to Program 12.

The Land Use Element / Housing Element Update began in 2020 with a Community Survey. Since that time several presentations and public discussions have ocurred at Planning Commission and Council. The Land Use Element will include Opportunity Zones to accomplish the transit, pedestrian and density goals as noted above. Update to the Land Use Element will occur after the ado ption of the Housin
g Element.

Program 16: Smart Planning Incentives
Increase applicants for Smart Planning Funds. Prepare and present proposed Program to City Manager and Planning Commission to improve competiveness. Identify sources of funding.

Continue, modified to Program 13.

The City continues to support funds for smart plannign projects. This includes working with AMBAG and TAMC on locating a multimodal transit center on First Street and the Downtown Addition developer to locate funding to build affordable housing along First Street Program 17: Energy Efficient Housing
Establish energy efficiency in older homes/new construction as standard practice in the Cit
y.

Continue, modified to Program 14.

The City continues to work with various developers to install solar energy. This includes working with King's Staion developer to install solar panels.

Program 18: Energy & Water Conservation
Reduce residential (and commercial) water use conformance with State guidelines and reduce the overall energy usa ge in the Cit
y.

Continue, modified to Program 15.

The City continues to work to conserve natrual resources. This includes work with the State Regional Water Quality Control Board, developing designs to allow stormwater infiltration into the groundwater basin.

Program 19: Green / Sustainable Building
Achieve increased energy efficiency/sustainability in all new projects.

Continue, modified to Program 16.

The City continues to work with developers to become more energy efficient. An example of this is King's Sation Affordable Housing Project was designed to qualify for the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED Program.

Jurisdiction King City
Reporting Year 2024 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested Other Funding Update the 6th Cycle (2023-2031)
of the City's Housing Element of
the General Plan
$65,000.00 $52,947.28 REAP
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0 00 Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 4Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0 5963
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 2Non-Deed Restricted 0Deed Restricted 0Non-Deed Restricted 0 5658

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in S $ 65,000.00
Task Status
In Progress
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Item No. 9(F)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: OCTAVIO HURTADO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
RE: ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES OVER (i) NINO FAMILY, L.P. PROPERTY, AND (ii)

CITY-OWNED PROPERTY
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-5025 to accept easements for utility and related purposes on (i) Nino Family L.P. property, and (ii) City-owned land (jointly the “Easements”); and 2) grant the City Manager signature authorization for minor changes to the easement deeds if required by the County Recorder’s Office and to execute the Certificate of Acceptance.

BACKGROUND:

The original specific map and tentative map of the Mills Ranch subdivision designed around an existing PG&E line that runs diagonally through the development. During the design and development of the improvement plans, the developer decided to underground an existing utility line in the proposed street right of way. In order to achieve undergrounding of the entire line across the development, utility easements are required.

DISCUSSION:

Phase 3 of the Mills Ranch development requires that the electrical lines be undergrounded. PG&E has commenced the work with inserting the conduit into the ground but requires proof of the existence of an easement in order to continue to insert the alternate lines and remove the overhead lines. The easement will be across a portion of the City’s real property currently used as a detention basin. The easement is located along the property line near the street.

Although the easement across the City’s real property is in favor of the City, the easement document provides that the easement will remain separate and not

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY

PURPOSES
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 3
merged into the fee interest until such time as the City may vacate the easement.

Given that the same requirement for undergrounding electrical lines will be required for Phase 4 of the Mills Ranch development, the developer has requested that the City accept a similar easement across a portion of the Phase 4 land.

A resolution accepting the Easements must be adopted to establish easements to underground the electrical lines.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no significant fiscal impact on the City caused by the adoption of the resolution accepting the Easements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Staff has performed a preliminary environmental assessment of this project and has determined that it falls within the Categorical Exemption set forth in Class 3 which exempts new construction of limited small new facilities, section 15303 because there are no improvements proposed. Furthermore, Staff has determined that none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in the CEQA Guidelines, section 15300.2 apply to this project.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Approve staff’s recommendations;

2. Modify and approve the proposed Resolution;

3. Do not approve staff’s recommendations; or

4. Provide other direction to staff.

Exhibits:

1. Resolution 2025-5025

2. Exhibit A Grant of Easement for Utilities and Related Purposes across property owned by Nino Family L.P.

3. Exhibit B Grant of Easement for Utilities and Related Purposes across property owned by the City of King. The Grant of Easement provides that the easement shall not merge into the fee interest owned by the City

RESOLUTION 2025-5025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING

ACCEPTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (I) OVER THE NINO FAMILY L.P. PROPERTY, AND (II) OVER CITY-OWNED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, ________________________ (“Developer”) is developing a residential project in multiple phases and needs PG&E to underground existing electrical lines pursuant to easements (i) across real property (APN 026-621-004) owned by Nino Family L.P. (“Nino Property”), and (ii) across a portion of real property owned by the City (APN 026-621-001) used as a detention basin (“City Property”); and WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept (i) the easement across the Nino Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Nino Easement”); and (ii) the easement across the City Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (“City Easement”).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KING, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. That the Nino Easement and the City Easement attached hereto (jointly the “Easements”) which are designated for use as public utility purposes are hereby accepted by the City and the City Manager is authorized to make minor modifications if required and to execute the acceptance of the Easements for recordation.

Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of March, 2025.

Mike LeBarre, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
By: ____________________
Roy Santos, City Attorney

CITY OF KING )

COUNTY OF MONTEREY )

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
I, ________________, City Clerk of the City of King, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-5025 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King at the regular meeting thereof, held on this 25th day of March , 2025, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Erica Sonne, City Clerk

EXHIBIT A

COPY OF NINO EASEMENT

EXHIBIT B

COPY OF CITY EASEMENT
EXHIBIT 2
1 FREE RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of King
212 S Vanderhurst Ave
King City, CA 93930
Attn: City Engineer
____________________________________________________________________________

GRANT OF EASEMENT

FOR UTILITIES AND RELATED PURPOSES
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, NINO FAMILY L.P., a California limited partnership (“Grantor”) hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF KING, a California municipal corporation (“Grantee”) a non-exclusive easement for utilities and related purposes, in, on, over, under and across the real property described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Easement”).

IN THE WITNESS THEREOF, Grantor has caused this Grant of Easement to be executed by its duly authorized representatives on the date and year set forth below.

Dated: _______________, 2025 “GRANTOR”
SUBORDINATION:

Nino Homes at Mills Ranch Phase 3, Inc, a
California corporation as optionee under
that certain Option Agreement recorded on
July 1, 2024 as Instrument No. 2024022865
in the Official Records of Monterey County,
hereby subordinates its interest under the
Option to this Grant of Easement.

Nino Homes at Mills Ranch Phase 3, Inc.,
a California corporation
By: _____________________
Michael J. Nino, Chief Executive Officer
By: ____________________
Tracy L. Nino, Secretary
NINO FAMILY L.P., a California limited
partnership
By: _________________________
Michael J. Nino, Trustee of the Mike
and Tracy Nino Family Revocable
Trust dated February 17, 1999 as
amended
General Partner
By: _________________________
Tracy L. Nino, Trustee of the Mike and
Tracy Nino Family Revocable Trust
dated February 17, 1999 as amended
General Partner
APN a portion of 026-621-004 (Space Above This Line for Recorder’s Office Use Only) THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES:

Documentary Transfer Tax is: $-0- per R&T §11922
(Exempt from Recording Fee per Gov. Code §6103)

EXHIBIT A
1 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR PURPOSES OF RECORDATION This is to certify that the easement interest in real property conveyed by the NINO FAMILY L.P., a California limited partnership as grantor to the CITY OF KING as grantee (“Grantee”), is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer and agent of Grantee and Grantee consents to the recording of the Grant of Easement for Utilities and Related Purposes.

Signed and dated on _____________, 2025 at City of King, California.

GRANTEE
CITY OF KING, a municipal corporation
By: ___________________________
Steve Adams, City Manager
1 EXHIBIT A TO GRANT DEED

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT
That certain real property in the City of King, County of Monterey, State of California legally described as follows:
1 EXHIBIT B TO GRANT DEED

DEPICTION OF EASEMENT
1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF ____________ )
On _________________, 2025 before me, ___________________________, a notary public, personally appeared _______________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_________________________________________
Notary Public
SEAL:

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_________________________________________
Notary Public
SEAL:

EXHIBIT 3
1 FREE RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of King
212 S Vanderhurst Ave
King City, CA 93930
Attn: City Engineer
____________________________________________________________________________

GRANT OF EASEMENT

FOR UTILITIES AND RELATED PURPOSES
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF KING, a California municipal corporation (“Grantor”) hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF KING, a California municipal corporation (“Grantee”) a non-exclusive easement for utilities and related purposes, in, on, over, under and across the real property described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Easement”).

The Easement is to remain separate and distinct and not be deemed merged into the fee interest until such time as the CITY OF KING may vacate the Easement in accordance with California law.

IN THE WITNESS THEREOF, Grantor has caused this Grant of Easement to be executed by its duly authorized representatives on the date and year set forth below.

Dated: _______________, 2025 “GRANTOR”

CITY OF KING CITY,
a California municipal corporation
By: _________________________
Steve Adams, City Manager
ATTEST:
__________________________
Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APN a portion of 026-621-001 (Space Above This Line for Recorder’s Office Use Only) THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES:

Documentary Transfer Tax is: $-0- per R&T §11922
(Exempt from Recording Fee per Gov. Code §6103)

EXHIBIT B
1 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR PURPOSES OF RECORDATION This is to certify that the easement interest in real property conveyed by the CITY OF KING as grantor to the CITY OF KING as grantee (“Grantee”), is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer and agent of Grantee and Grantee consents to the recording of the Grant of Easement for Utilities and Related Purposes.

Signed and dated on _____________, 2025 at City of King, California.

GRANTEE
CITY OF KING, a municipal corporation
By: ___________________________
Steve Adams, City Manager
1 EXHIBIT A TO GRANT DEED

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT
That certain real property in the City of King, County of Monterey, State of California legally described as follows:
1 EXHIBIT B TO GRANT DEED

DEPICTION OF EASEMENT
1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_________________________________________
Notary Public
SEAL:

Joint Use Agreement (Rev. 7/2022)
1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO:

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 210
Oakland, CA 94612
Attn: Land Rights Library
Location: City/Uninc______________________
Recording Fee $_____________________________
Document Transfer Tax $ __________
[ ] This is a conveyance where the consideration and
Value is less than $100.00 (R&T 11911).
[ ] Computed on Full Value of Property Conveyed, or
[ ] Computed on Full Value Less Liens
& Encumbrances Remaining at Time of Sale
[ ] Exempt from the fee per GC 27388.1 (a) (2); This
document is subject to Documentary Transfer Tax
Signature of declarant or agent determining tax
(SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
LD# AGREEMENT

J O I N T U S E A G R E E M E N T
This JOINT USE AGREEMENT, hereinafter called “Agreement”, entered into this ______ day of______________, 20___, by and between PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation, hereinafter called "PG&E", and the CITY OF KING, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter called "Agency",

RECITALS
A. PG&E is the owner in possession of certain rights of way and easements, hereinafter referred to as "PG&E's easement", described as follows:

A claim of prescription on the electric distribution facilities originally installed as an adverse use on private property with knowledge of the property owner and without permission and evidence of a grant of right of way, easement, permit, lease or license and were immediately placed into public service. The electric distribution facilities have Exhibit 4
2 been continuously maintained in the same location in excess of five years to meet the requirements for PG&E to claim a prescriptive right.

B. Nino Family L.P., a California limited partnership, hereinafter called “Developer”, has a project known as “Tract No. 1568, Mills Ranch Phase 3” in the vicinity of Carmona Drive and Roma Way, in the City of King, County of Monterey.

Developer is required, by Agency, to underground certain existing PG&E overhead electric facilities, and construct road improvements as conditions of approval for the Developer’s project, hereinafter called “Project”.

C. Agency has acquired certain rights of ways for road purposes within the Project, hereinafter referred to as "Agency right of way", which said Agency right of way is subject to PG&E's easement.

D. PG&E's overhead facilities installed pursuant to PG&E's easement will interfere with the development of the Project and the Developer desires to eliminate such interference, by relocating and modifying a portion of PG&E’s facilities to a new underground location within said Agency right of way.

NOW, THEREFORE, PG&E and Agency hereby mutually agree as follows:

1. The location of PG&E's easement so far as it now lies within said Agency right of way is hereby changed to the strip of land within said Agency right of way, hereinafter referred to as "Joint Use Area", described as follows:

A ten (10) foot wide strip of land lying five (5) feet on each side of the relocated underground facilities, shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3 2. Agency acknowledges PG&E’s title to PG&E’s easement in said new location and the priority of PG&E’s title over the title of Agency therein. PG&E has and reserves the right and easement to use, in common with the public’s use of Agency’s right of way, said new location for all of the purposes for which PG&E’s easement was acquired, without need for any further permit or permission from Agency. Except in emergencies, PG&E shall give reasonable notice to Agency before performing any work on PG&E’s facilities in said new location where such work will be performed in, on or over the traveled way or improved shoulders of said Agency right of way or obstruct traffic. PG&E shall make adequate provisions for the protection of the traveling public.

3. In the event that the future use of said Agency right of way shall at any time or times necessitate a rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal of any of PG&E’s facilities then existing in said new location, the Agency shall notify PG&E in writing of such necessity and agree to reimburse PG&E on demand for its costs incurred in complying with such notice. PG&E will provide Agency with plans of its proposed rearrangement and an estimate of the cost thereof and, upon approval of such plans by Agency and the execution of a relocation contract, PG&E will promptly proceed to effect such rearrangement, relocation, reconstruction or removal. PG&E shall make adequate provisions for the protection of the traveling public. No further permit or permission from Agency for such rearrangement shall be required and if such rearrangement shall require relocation of any of PG&E’s facilities outside of said new location, Agency will (1) enter into PG&E’s standard form of Joint Use Agreement covering the replacement location of PG&E’s easement within the right of way, (2) provide executed document(s) granting to PG&E good and sufficient easement(s) outside of the right of way if necessary to replace PG&E’s easement or any part thereof, and (3) reimburse PG&E for any costs it may be required to expend to acquire such 4 easement, provided it is mutually agreed in writing that PG&E shall acquire such easement.

4. PG&E does hereby surrender and quitclaim to Agency all of PG&E's right, title and interest under and by virtue of PG&E's easement in the existing location within said Agency right of way and not included in said new location.

5. PG&E hereby consents to the construction, reconstruction, maintenance or use by Agency of the Project over, along and upon PG&E's easement in the new location subject to PG&E's right and easement to use said new location for all of the purposes for which PG&E's easement was acquired and to the terms and conditions herein contained. PG&E does not by this Agreement and shall not be deemed to subordinate its rights in the new location to any use which Agency shall make of said area.

6. Except as expressly set forth herein, this Agreement shall not in any way alter, modify or terminate any provision of PG&E's easement or the priority thereof over the title of Agency in said new location. Both Agency and PG&E shall use said new location in such a manner as not to interfere unreasonably with the rights of the other.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed as a release or waiver of any claim for compensation or damages which PG&E or Agency may now have or may hereafter acquire resulting from the construction of additional facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either Agency or PG&E in such a manner as to cause an unreasonable interference with the use of said new location by the other party. 5 7. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of both parties.

The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officials.

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a
California corporation
By______________________________
Name Marisol Garcia
Its Supervisor, Land Rights
CITY OF KING, a California municipal
corporation
By______________________________
Name ___________________________
Its ______________________________
I hereby certify that a resolution was adopted
on the ____ day of _________, 20____, by the
_____________________________________
authorizing the foregoing grant of easement.

By__________________________________
Rancho San Lorenzo

BRUNIAPLACE

AURORA W AY
ROMA
W
AY

BOSTONLANE

LIVINGSTON
AVENUE

VICTORIAAVENUE
CARMONA DRIVE (60' wide)
UTILITY LOCATIONS & AREAS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.

Project:

SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE

PLAT MAP

REFERENCES

MERIDIAN

SCALE DATE
CITY OF:

PG&E DIVISION AUTHORIZ DRAWING NO.

COUNTY OF:

F.B.: DR.BY: CH.BY:
10'
10'
EXHIBIT "A"
1"=200' 2/24/2025

MONTEREY
BFF3 LJTG
Central Coast 35501135 EXHIBIT "A"
(05) (20 S.) (08 E.) (MDB&M)
Joint Use Areas - Tract No. 1568, Mills Ranch Phase 3
N/A
R 2208 (E)
24 C&T 92, 2219-08-0074
KING
PG&E
Electric
Transm
ission
Easem
ent(LD
2219-08-0074, 617-OR-769)
NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4)
(T. 20 S. R. 08. E, SEC. 5

EXISTING ELECTRIC POLE
MILLS RANCH PHASE 3 PROJECT BOUNDARY

OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE LINE TO REMAIN

OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE LINE BEING REMOVED

LOT / PARCEL LINES

JOINT USE AREA
(TO REMAIN)

POLE LINE

OVERHEAD

EXISTING

POLE LINE (TO REMAIN)

EXISTING OVERHEAD
(BEING REMOVED)

POLE LINE

EXISTING OVERHEAD

UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
LYING 5' ON EACH SIDE OF RELOCATED
10' WIDE JOINT USE AREA
24 C&T 92
PHASE 3

MILLS RANCH
24 C&T 83
PHASE 2B

MILLS RANCH
24 C&T 92
Parcel A
Item No. 9 (G)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF INTERPRETATION REGARDING

WORKER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL

CANNABIS BUSINESS LABOR CONTRACTORS
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council: 1) adopt a Resolution interpreting the application of employee work permit requirements for commercial cannabis businesses to employees of labor contractors under the provisions of Section 17.03.070 of Title 17 of the King City Municipal Code; and 2) direct staff to prepare an ordinance incorporating the interpretation into the Municipal Code provisions.

BACKGROUND:

In September 2016, the City Council adopted amendments to Title 17, Chapter

17.03 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to commercial cannabis activity to facilitate and regulate the allowance of indoor commercial cannabis activity, as well as the manufacturing and testing of commercial cannabis products. In June 2017, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Ordinance that refined the work permit approval process and other provisions. The Ordinance was further amended in September 2021.

The work permit process includes requirements for a background check and approval by the City Manager, including a Livescan. It covers all employees and independent contractors. The fee for each employee work permit is $250 for new employees and $200 for renewals. There are separate provisions in Section

17.03.210 covering additional background checks required for owners, investors, shareholders, board members, managers, and supervisors.

Cannabis businesses have communicated that they currently have a need to utilize labor contractors to meet their temporary employment demand to remain economically viable. Staff have assessed the issue and recommend the City

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF INTERPRETATION REGARDING WORKER PERMIT

REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS LABOR

CONTRACTORS
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 3
Council approve an interpretation of the employee work permit requirements to address this issue.

DISCUSSION:

The City’s work permit requirements will make the use of labor contractors infeasible if applied to temporary seasonal workers employed by the labor contractor. These are typically temporary workers who are assigned to multiple jobs. They are also often brought in to help with spikes in short-term workload to address immediate needs. Background checks for that number of workers could not meet the required time constraints, would be logistically difficult to process, and would be cost prohibitive.

Staff believe that seasonal workers employed and supervised by a labor contractor on a temporary basis pose less safety risks than permanent employees. It appears that the City’s requirements exceed those of many other jurisdictions. Given the current oversaturation of cannabis product and competitive status of the market, staff has determined some modifications to the City’s processes are needed to avoid closure of cannabis businesses, which would result in a loss of jobs and City revenues.

The proposed Resolution would determine that the owners and direct managers of a labor contractor hired by a commercial cannabis business shall fall under the definition of an independent contractor involving the application of employee work permits requirements. Other workers employed by a labor contractor hired by a commercial cannabis business to provide temporary labor would not fall under the definition of employee or independent contractor as it pertains to the requirement to obtain a work permit prior to commencing work.

The Resolution interpretation would become effective immediately. It is also recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare a revision to the Ordinance to incorporate the interpretation into the Municipal Code provisions.

COST ANALYSIS:

There will be legal costs associated with drafting the Ordinance changes. The overall potential impact will be to help prevent a potential loss of up to $400,000 annually.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5032

RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERPRETATION OF THE APPLICATION OF EMPLOYEE

WORK PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESSES TO

EMPLOYEES OF LABOR CONTRACTORS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION

17.03.070 OF TITLE 17 OF THE KING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, in September 2016, the City Council adopted amendments to Title 17, Chapter 17.03 of the King City Municipal Code pertaining to commercial cannabis activity to facilitate and regulate the allowance of indoor commercial cannabis activity, as well as the manufacturing and testing of commercial cannabis products; and WHEREAS, in June 2017, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Ordinance that refined the work permit approval process and other provisions; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance was further amended in September 2021; and WHEREAS, Section 17.03.070 sets forth provisions and requirements for employee work permits, which requires every employee or independent contractor working at a commercial cannabis business to obtain an employee work permit issued by the City before commencing any work; and
WHEREAS, the work permit process includes requirements for a background check and approval by the City Manager;
WHEREAS, cannabis businesses have communicated that they currently have a need to utilize labor contractors to meet their temporary employment demand in order to remain economically viable; and
WHEREAS, the City’s work permit requirements will make the use of labor contractors infeasible if applied to temporary seasonal workers employed by the labor contractor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that seasonal workers employed and supervised by a labor contractor pose less safety risks than permanent employees; and WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Attorney have determined an interpretation of the City Council regarding the definition and application of the term “independent contractor” in the Ordinance is necessary to render a decision regarding the application of worker permit requirements to workers employed by a labor contractor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined this interpretation is consistent with the language and intent of the Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of King approves the following determination regarding provisions set forth in Section 17.03.070 Employee work permits:

1. The owners of a labor contractor hired by a commercial cannabis business and direct managers of employees assigned to work at the site shall fall under the definition of an independent contractor with regard to the application of employee work permits requirements.

CC Resolution No. 2025-5032

Page 2 of 2 ends

2. Other workers employed by a labor contractor hired by a commercial cannabis business to provide temporary workers shall not fall under the definition of employee or independent contractor as it pertains to the requirement to obtain a work permit prior to commencing work.

This resolution was passed and adopted this 25th day of March, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, Council Members:

NAYS, Council Members:

ABSENT, Council Members:

ABSTAIN, Council Members:

APPROVED:

Mike LeBarre, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Sonne, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Roy Santos, City Attorney
Item No. 9 (H)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DOREEN LIBERTO, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
RE: CONSIDERATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing submittal of a Prohousing Designation Program Application with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”).

BACKGROUND:

On July 1, 2021, HCD established the Prohousing Designation Program pursuant to California Government Code §65589.9. The Program creates incentives for jurisdictions compliant with Housing Element requirements that can demonstrate that they have enacted, or plan to enact, Prohousing policies in four categories. The categories are Favorable Zoning and Land Use, Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes, Reduction of Construction and Development Costs, and Providing Financial Subsidies.

The Prohousing Designation provides jurisdictions with incentives in the form of additional points and other preferences in several of the State's competitive grant funding programs, including the Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities (AHSC) and Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) programs. The State also adds incentives for additional funding programs.

The application includes a self-scoring worksheet that provides between 1 and 3 points for each Prohousing policy. Additional points can be awarded for "enhancement factors" for policies that further implement specified Statewide goals.

To earn the Prohousing Designation, a city must achieve a minimum score of 30 points. Staff has proposed a total score of 41 points for King City.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION MARCH 25, 2025

Page 2 of 3 ends

In 2024, the City submitted an application for the Prohousing Designation; however, the application was rejected in light of the 6th Cycle Housing Element not being completed. Now that the 2023 -2031 (Cycle 6) Housing Element has been adopted the intent is to reapply for the Prohousing Designation.

DISCUSSION:

Exhibit 1 of the staff report is the Prohousing Designation Application. Staff calculated a total of 41 points based on past, current and proposed housing efforts made on behalf of the City. Once the Prohousing Application is submitted to HCD it will take them approximately 60 days to review and respond back with a determination on the designation. Exhibit 2 (Resolution) authorizes the submittal of the Prohousing Designation Application and authorizes the City Manager to sign all related documents.

COST ANALYSIS:

City staff prepared the draft application for the Prohousing Designation using currently budgeted staff time. No additional funding appropriation from the General Fund is required. Granting the Prohousing designation would provide the City with a competitive advantage for several State grant funding programs, which could make more grant funding available to the City.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Staff has conducted an assessment of the type of environmental document that may be needed and determined with certainty that there is no possibility that the Prohousing Application activity will have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore is not subject to CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061 (b) (3).

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:

1. Approve Resolution No. 2025 – 5030 and authorize submittal of the Prohousing Designation Application;

2. Direct staff to modify the Prohousing Designation Application;

3. Do not approve submittal of the Prohousing Designation Application; or

5. Provide other direction to staff.

Exhibits:

1. Prohousing Designation Program Application

2. Prohousing Designation Program Resolution No. 2025-5030

EXHIBIT 1
Prohousing Designation Program Application
State of California
Governor Gavin Newsom
Melinda Grant, Undersecretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development
Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
2020 West El Camino, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/prohousing Email: [email protected]
January 2024
Prohousing Designation Program Application Package
Instructions
The applicant is applying for a Prohousing Designation under the Prohousing Designation Program (“Prohousing” or “Program”), which is administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) pursuant to Government Code section 65589.9.

The Program creates incentives for Jurisdictions that are compliant with State Housing Element Law and that have enacted Prohousing Policies. These incentives will take the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of applications for competitive housing and infrastructure programs. The administrators of each such program will determine the value and form of the preference.

In order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation, the applicant must accurately complete all sections of this application, including any relevant appendices. The Department reserves the right to request additional clarifying information from the applicant.

This application is subject to Government Code section 65589.9 and to the regulations (Cal.

Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) adopted by the Department in promulgation thereof (“Regulations”). All capitalized terms in this application shall have the meanings set forth in the Regulations.

All applicants must submit a complete, signed application package to the Department, in electronic format, in order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation. Please direct electronic copies of the completed application package to the following email address:

[email protected].

A complete application will include all items identified in the Application Checklist.

In relation to Appendix 1, the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, please use strikethrough and underline if proposing any modifications to the text of the Resolution. Please be aware, any sustentative deviations from the Formal Resolution may result in an incomplete application and will likely be subject to additional internal review and potential delays.

Appendix 2, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule, applies only if an application includes proposed policies.

Appendix 3, Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet, includes a blank template to be completed by the applicant as part of the application, as well as a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet with an example of how this template may be completed.

Appendix 4 lists examples of Prohousing Policies with enhancement factors to aid applicants in understanding how enhancement factors may be applied.

Appendix 5 is where the applicant will include any additional information and supporting documentation for the application.

If you have questions regarding this application or the Program, or if you require technical assistance in preparing this application, please email [email protected].

Application Checklist
Yes No
Application Information ☒ ☐
Certification and Acknowledgement ☒ ☐
The Legislative Information form is completed. ☒ ☐
The Threshold Requirements Checklist is completed. ☒ ☐
A duly adopted and certified Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program is included in the application package. (See Appendix 1 for the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program form.)
☒ ☐
If applicable, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule is completed. (See Appendix 2.)
☒ ☐
The Project Proposal Scoring Sheet is completed. (See Appendix 3 for the Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and the Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet.)
☒ ☐
Additional information and supporting documentation (Applicant to provide as Appendix 5)
☒ ☐
Application Information
Applicant (Jurisdiction): City of King
Applicant Mailing Address: 212 S. Vanderhurst Avenue
City: King City
ZIP Code: 93930
Website: www.kingcity.com
Authorized Representative Name Steven Adams
Authorized Representative Title: City Manager
Phone: (831) 385-3281
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person Name: Doreen Liberto, AICP
Contact Person Title: Community Development Director
Phone: (831) 385-3281
Email: [email protected]
Proposed Total Score (Based on
Appendix 3):
41 CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
As authorized by the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution No. 2025-5030), which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, I hereby submit this full and complete application on behalf of the applicant.

I certify that all information and representations set forth in this application are true and correct.

I further certify that any proposed Prohousing Policy identified herein will be enacted within two (2) years of the date of this application submittal.

I acknowledge that this application constitutes a public record under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) and is therefore subject to public disclosure by the Department.

Signature: __________________________________________
Name and Title: Steven Adams, City Manager
Date: March 13, 2025
Legislative Information
District Number Legislators Name(s)
State
Assembly
District
29 Assembly Member Robert Rivas
State
Senate
District
17 Senator John Laird
Applicants can find their respective State Senate representatives at https://www.senate.ca.gov/, and their respective State Assembly representatives at https://www.assembly.ca.gov/
Threshold Requirements Checklist
The applicant meets the following threshold requirements in accordance with Section 6604 of the Regulations:

Yes No
The applicant is a Jurisdiction. ☒ ☐
The applicant has adopted a Compliant Housing Element. ☒ ☐ The applicant has submitted or will submit a legally sufficient Annual Progress Report prior to designation.
☒ ☐
The applicant has completed or agrees to complete, on or before the relevant statutory deadlines, any rezone program or zoning that is necessary to remain in compliance with Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1), and 65584.09, subdivision (a), and with California Coastal Commission certification where appropriate. ☒ ☐
The applicant is in compliance, at the time of the application, with applicable state housing law, including, but not limited to those included in Government Section 65585, subdivision (j); laws relating to the imposition of school facilities fees or other requirements (Gov. Code, § 65995 et seq.); Least Cost Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65913.1); Permit Streamlining Act (Gov. Code, § 65920 et seq.); and provisions relating to timeliness of CEQA processing by local governments in Public Resources Code sections 21080.1, 21080.2, and 21151.5(a). ☒ ☐
The applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its treatment of homeless encampments on public property complies with and will continue to comply with the constitutional rights of persons experiencing homelessness and that it has submitted a one-page summary to the Department demonstrating how the applicant has enacted best practices in their jurisdiction related to the treatment of unhoused individuals camping on public property, consistent with United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments,” (June 17, 2022 update), hereby incorporated by reference. ☒ ☐
The applicant has duly adopted and certified, by the applicant’s governing body, a Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (A true and correct copy of the resolution is included in this application package.) ☒ ☐
The applicant has demonstrated that they engaged in a diligent public participation process that included 1) outreach through a variety of methods and languages; 2) specific efforts to engage all segments of the community, including individuals or representatives of lower-income and special needs households, for-profit and non-profit developers and special needs service providers; 3) availability of the draft document to the public, including notification to interested parties and all segments of the community for 30 days and subsequent versions for 7 days; 4) public hearings and informative meetings; and 5) consideration of comments, including incorporation of comments into a jurisdiction’s application and Prohousing Policies, as appropriate. The applicant has submitted documentation of comments received during this process. ☒ ☐
Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1). 3 1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 162, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). 3 1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1).
2 1D Density bonus programs that allow additional density for additional affordability beyond minimum statutory requirements (Gov. Code, § 65915 et seq.).
2 1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit Law, (Gov. Code, §§ 65852.2, 65852.22) (e.g., permitting more than one converted ADU; one detached, new construction ADU; and one JADU per single-family lot), and in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 192, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B).
2 1F Eliminating minimum parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 1G Zoning or incentives that are designed to increase affordable housing development in a range of types, including, but not limited to, large family units, Supportive Housing, housing for transition age foster youth, and deep affordability targeted for Extremely Low-Income Households in all parts of the Jurisdiction, with at least some of the zoning, other land use designation methods, or incentives being designed to increase affordable housing development in higher resource areas shown in the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, and with the Jurisdiction having confirmed that it considered and addressed potential environmental justice issues in adopting and implementing 2 this policy, especially in areas with existing industrial and polluting uses.
1H Zoning or other land use designation methods to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more non-residential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying non-residential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1I Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions or land use designation methods to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio, height limits, minimum lot or unit sizes, setbacks, and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
1 1J Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a Housing Sustainability District, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 1K Establishment of an inclusionary housing program requiring new developments to include housing affordable to and reserved for lowand very low-income households, consistent with the requirements of AB 1505 (Chapter 376, Statutes of 2017, Gov. Code, § 65850.01). 1 1L Other zoning and land use actions not described in Categories (A)-(K) of this section that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for multiple housing types, including, for example, single-family, multifamily and mixed-use housing.
3 2B Acceleration of Housing Production through the establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents. 2 2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law, (e.g., Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2D Establishment of permitting processes that take less than four months to complete. Policies under this category must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2F Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for homes affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 2G Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan. 1 2H Absence, elimination, or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 2I Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 2J Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs or multifamily housing.
1 2K Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 2L Documented practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the internet.
1 2M Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this category.
1 2N Other policies not described in Categories (2)(A)-(M) of this section that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development with units affordable to Lower-Income Households. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable housing impact fees, and commercial linkage fees).
3 3B Adoption of policies that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design packages.
2 3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A), including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable impact fees and commercial linkage fees).
1 3D Accelerating innovative housing production through innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models, community ownership, and other forms of social housing) that reduce development costs.
1 3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes, creation of on-street parking for bikes, transit-related improvements, or establishment of carshare programs. 1 3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in lowdensity, single-family residential areas. 1 3H Adoption of ordinances that reduce barriers, beyond existing law, for the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 3I Other policies not described in Categories (3)(A)-(H) of this section that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs. 1 Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
4A Establishment of a housing fund or contribution of funds towards affordable housing through proceeds from approved ballot measures.
2 4B Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund, which include the Jurisdiction’s own funding contributions. The Jurisdiction must contribute to the local or regional housing trust fund regularly and significantly. For the purposes of this Category, “regularly” shall be defined as at least annually, and “significant” contributions shall be determined based on the impact the contributions have in accelerating the production of affordable housing.
2 4C Demonstration of regular use or planned regular use of funding (e.g., federal, state, or local) for preserving assisted units at-risk of conversion to market rate uses and conversion of market rate uses to units with affordability restrictions (e.g., acquisition/rehabilitation).

For the purposes of this category, “regular use” can be demonstrated through the number of units preserved annually by utilizing this funding source.
2 4D Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to Lower- and Moderate-Income Households.
2 4E A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to Lower Income Households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or below-market land leases.
2 4F Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to Lower-Income Households. 2 4G Prioritization of local general funds to accelerate the production of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
2 4H Directed residual redevelopment funds to accelerate the production of affordable housing.
1 4I Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source sufficient to facilitate and support the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 4J Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. This point shall not be awarded if the applicant earns two points pursuant to Category (4)(G).
1 4K Providing operating subsidies for permanent Supportive Housing. 1 4L Providing subsidies for housing affordable to Extremely Low-Income Households.
1 4M Other policies not described in Categories (4)(A)-(L) of this section that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors
The Department shall utilize enhancement factors to increase the point scores of Prohousing Policies. An individual Prohousing Policy may not use more than one enhancement factor.

Each Prohousing Policy will receive extra points for enhancement factors in accordance with the chart below.

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1 The policy represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, housing affordable to Lower-Income Households, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) toward placebased strategies for community revitalization and equitable quality of life in lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and disadvantaged communities pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 39711 and 39715 (California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of Lower-Income Households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 5 Rezoning and other policies that support intensification of residential development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 7 Zoning policies, including inclusionary housing policies, that increase housing choices and affordability, particularly for Lower-Income Households, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing outside of those required pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(10), and 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Instructions
The Department shall validate applicants’ scores based on the extent to which each identified Prohousing Policy contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production. The Department shall assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies in accordance with statutory requirements and the Regulations.

The Department shall further assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies using the following four scoring categories: Favorable Zoning and Land Use, Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes, Reduction of Construction and Development Costs, and Providing Financial Subsidies. Applicants shall demonstrate that they have enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production in each of the four categories. A Prohousing Designation requires a total score of 30 points or more across all four categories.

Instructions
Please utilize one row of the Scoring Sheet for each Prohousing Policy. • Category Number: Select the relevant category number from the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. Where appropriate, applicants may utilize a category number more than once. • Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy: Set forth a brief description of the enacted or proposed Prohousing Policy.
• Enacted or Proposed: Identify the Prohousing Policy as enacted or proposed. For proposed Prohousing Policies, please complete Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule. • Documentation Type: For enacted Prohousing Policies, identify the relevant documentary evidence (e.g., resolution, zoning code provisions). For proposed Prohousing Policies, identify the documentation which shows that implementation of the policy is pending.
• Web Links/Electronic Copies: Insert the Web link(s) to the relevant documentation or indicate that electronic copies of the documentation have been attached to this application as Appendix 5. • Points: Enter the appropriate number of points using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Category Number (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the appropriate category number using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Points (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the point(s) for that Prohousing Policy.
• Total Points: Add the enhancement point(s) to the Prohousing Policy’s general point score.

Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 01/24)
Appendix 1: Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program Formal Resolution for the PROHOUSING Designation Program RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5030

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF

CITY OF KING AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE

PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the City of King (“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and actions include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that the Prohousing Policies in its Application comply with its duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing pursuant to Government Code sections 8899.50 and 65583. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its general plan is in alignment with an adopted sustainable communities strategy pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21155- 21155.4. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its policies for the treatment of homeless encampments on public property comply with and will continue to comply with the Constitution and that it has enacted best practices in its jurisdiction that are consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments” (June 17, 2022, update).

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

6. City Manager is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: ______ NOES: ______ ABSENT: ______ ABSTAIN: ______ The undersigned, Steven Adams, City Manager of Applicant, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: DATE:

NAME: TITLE:

Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule
Category
Number
Concise Written Description of
Proposed Policy
Key Milestones and
Milestone Dates
Anticipated
Completion
Date
Notes
1G The City is preparing a comprehensive update
to the Zoning Code into a single regulatory
document as a Development Code. The
Development Code includes zoning,
subdivision regulations to accelerate housing
development.

In progress December
2025
3D The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to
allow mobile and manufactured homes in
residential zones subject to the requirements
of California Health and Safety Code §18500
et seq and Government Code section 65852.3.

Amended to allow mobile
and manufactured homes in
Sections 17.10.040 (A
District), 17.12.020 (R-1
District), 17.13.020 (RI
District), 17.14.020 (R-2
District), 17.16.020 (R-3
District), 17.18.020 (R-4
District), and 17.38.020 (S-F
District).

August 2025
1J Farmworker Employee Housing. Consistent
with Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5
and 17021.6, amend the Zoning Code to clarify
that farmworker housing is permitted by right,
without a conditional use permit, in singlefamily zones for six or fewer persons and in zones allowing agricultural uses with no more
than 12 units or 36 beds.

Amend text to allow
farmworker employee
housing for six or fewer
persons by right, without a
conditional use permit, in
single-family zones in
Sections 17.10.020 (A
District), 17.12.020 (R-1
District), 17.14.020 (R-2
District), 17.16.020 (R-3
District), 17.18.020 (R-4
District), 17.34.020 (O
District), and 17.38.020 (S-F
District).
.

August 2025 In addition, amend text to allow farmworker employee housing with no more than 12
units or 36 beds in zones allowing
agricultural uses with no more than 12 units
or 36 beds in Sections 17.10.020 (A
District), 17.13.020 (RI District), 17.24.030
(C-2 District), 17.30.020 (M-1 District),

17.31.020 (M-2 District), 17.34.030 (O
District), 17.36.020 (P-F District), and

17.38.020 (S-F District).

Added new Chapter 17.81 (Employee
Housing (for Farmworkers)) to comply with
State law requirements
1D Density Bonus. Review and revise the City’s
Zoning Code to ensure consistency with State
Density Bonus Law.

Added Chapter 17.51
(Density Bonus)
August 2025
3H Establishing reasonable accommodation
procedures (i.e., that does not require a CUP
or variance) to assist people with disabilities by
ensuring equal access to housing.

Regulations, policies, and practices should not:
(1) Deny housing based upon the disability of
the residents, (2) Impose special restrictions
on disability related services, (3) Characterize
congregate living arrangements as a business,
and (4) Impose restrictions on ADA retrofits.

Draft Chapter 17.74 August 2025
Appendix 3: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Project Proposal Scoring Sheet for KING CITY
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Point
s
Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1B Duplexes permitted by
right through a
ministerial review
process in the R-1
Single-Family Zone per
Municipal Code Section

17.80.020. Two
primary dwelling units
are permitted with an
ADU or a Junior ADU.

Applications are
reviewed by the
building official through
a plot plan review
process.

E Zoning Code City of King,

CA SECOND

UNITS AND

TWO-UNIT

DEVELOPME
NTS
City of King,

CA URBAN

LOT SPLITS
3 0 0 3
1D City is currently working
on a Development
Code that will merge
Title 17 Zoning and
Title 16 Subdivision into
one regulatory
document and focus on
ways to accelerate
housing development.

The Development Code
will include a Density
Bonus ordinance.

P Commitment Letter Electronic
Copy Attached
2 0 0 2
1F No additional parking
requirements for
accessory dwelling
units in R-1 and Muti-
family zones if located
within one-half mile of
public transit.

Reduced parking for
housing developments
may be processed
(Muni Code 17.52.040)
through a
recommendation to
Planning Commission
when undue hardship
on the property exists.

E Zoning Code/ City of King,
CA

ACCESSORY

DWELLING
UNITS
City of King,

CA OFF-
STREET

PARKING
2002
1G Zoning Amendment for
Neighborhood
Commercial (C-N) Zone
District Standards to
include mixed use
projects with residential
on second floor and
affordable residential,
affordable multiple-
family dwellings of 12
units per acre.

City is preparing a
comprehensive update
to the Zoning Code into
a single regulatory
document as a
Development Code.

The Development Code
includes zoning,
subdivision regulations
to accelerate housing
development.

EPZoning Code City of King,
CA C-N—

NEIGHBORH
OOD

COMMERCIA

L DISTRICT
1612
1H In 2016 City approved a
Zoning Text
Amendment to allow
Farmworker Housing in
the First Street Corridor
(FSC) Zone and within
the General
Commercial (C-2) Zone
allowing Mixed
Development with
Residential Units in the
first floor.

E Zoning Code
Ordinance 722 and
Ordinance 2015-715
City of King,
CA C-2—

GENERAL

COMMERCIA

L DISTRICT
Electronic
Copy Attached
1001
1J Established a Dual
Land Use Designation
and Zoning Overlay to
allow for seasonal
employee housing
development
Farmworker Employee
Housing. Consistent
with Health and Safety
Code Sections 17021.5
and 17021.6, amend
the Zoning Code to
clarify that farmworker
housing is permitted by
right, without a
conditional use permit,
in single-family zones
for six or fewer persons
and in zones allowing
agricultural uses with
no more than 12 units
or 36 beds.

EPZoning Code
Draft Ordinance
City of King,
CA

SEASONAL

EMPLOYEE

HOUSING
1123
1K Established
Inclusionary Housing
Program for
developments of 20 or
more units to provide

2.5% very low and 5%
low income units and
run with the land for 55
years.

E Zoning Code City of King,
CA

INCLUSIONA

RY HOUSING

REQUIREME
NTS
1001
1L City initiated
proceedings pursuant
to Cortese-Knox-
Hertberg Local
Government
Reorganization Act of
2000 to provide
connection to
wastewater treatment
services to Collegville
an agricultural
employee housing
project on septic for
health and safety of the users of the septic
system.

E Resolution No. 2017-
4567
Electronic
copy attached
1812
2A Established ministerial
review for approval of
single-family homes
and multi-family as
permitted by right and
processed through the
building permit process.

E Zoning CodeR-1
https://ecode3

60.com/44584
404#4458440 6R-2
https://ecode3

60.com/44584
490#4458449 2R-3
https://ecode3

60.com/44584
531#4458453 3R-4
https://ecode3

60.com/44584
585#4458458 7
3003
2B Arboleda Specific Plan
and Mills Ranch
Specific Plans were
approved and adopted
for acceleration of
housing production.

These specific plans
with accompanying
EIRs allow for quick
review of housing
permits at the building
permit level. A Master
Plan Check for each
model home type is
done and then production plot plans
are submitted as part of
the housing permits at
the building permit
level.

E Resolution Arboleda
Specific Plan
Resolution 4053
and Mills Ranch
Specific Plan
Resolution 05-4127
Electronic
Copy Attached
2002
2D Established an online
permit submittal system
for online building and
planning permit
submittals.

Development review of
entitlement projects
includes a streamline
cross-departmental
project review and
weekly established
Project Review
Committee meetings to
track progress.

Established flow charts
for processing of
development review
projects.

E Website for permit
portal is through
Citizenserve
Building Permit
Review Flowchart
https://www4.c
itizenserve.co
m/Portal/Porta
lController?Act
ion=showPer
mit&ctzPageP
refix=Portal_&i
nstallationID=
367&original_ii
d=0&original_
contactID=0
Attached
Flowcharts for
Building and
Development
Review
Process
2002
2E Architectural Reviews
are (non-public hearing
items for development
projects that are
consistent with zoning
and general plan. City
may process an
Architectural Review
concurrently with
Building and
Engineering plans.

E Zoning Code City of King,
CA

ARCHITECTU
RAL

CONTROL
2002
2G Establishment of the
Historic Corridor
Revitalization Plan VC,
FSC, VB and C-2 zone
allowing a mixed use
and live work
development with a list
of allowable uses by
right.

E HCRP Regulatory
Plan
Final-Draft-
Historic-
Corridor-
Revitalization-
Plan-PDF
1001
2I Concurrent reviews are
accepted for land use
entitlement/developmen
t review applications for
expedited review under
one submittal. Project
Review Committee
(PRC) is established to
review projects on a
weekly basis consisting
with representative of
city departments
(planning, public works,
building, city manager,
fire, police). City
recently hired a full-time
Community
Development Director
and a full-time Planning
Technician to
coordinate with PRC on
the applications from
beginning to end.

E Community
Development General
Application Form and
Flow Chart
Land Use
Development
Permits | King,
CA
1001
2J The Building
Department has
established priority
permit review for ADUs
and JADUs. There is a
two week plan check
review period set up.

Building Staff is in
communication with the
applicants on status or
the applicants can log
into their Citizenserve
account to see the
status online.

E ADU Handout FAQs • ADU
Permit
Process for
King City
1123
2K The Community
Development
Department has a
standardized
application form for all
entitlements. The City’s
permit portal is in the
process of updated to
reflect that
standardized
application for
entitlements.

E General Application
Form
General-
Application-
Form-PDF
1001
3A Approved City Master
Fee Schedule has a
reduction in impact fees
for Low, Very Low and
Extremely Low Income
Restricted Dwellings.

E Fee Schedule (Impact
Fee Schedule starts
on page 12)
Master-Fee-
Schedule-PDF
3003
3B The City has pre-
approved ADU design
packages.

E Pre-Approved
Detached ADU plans
Accessory
Dwelling Pre-
Approved
Plans | King,
CA
2002
3D City is working on a
proposed zoning text
amendment to allow
mobile and
manufactured homes in
residential zones
subject to the
requirements of
California Health and
Safety Code §18500 et
seq and Government
Code section 65852.3
P Draft Ordinance Electronic
Copy Attached
1001
3E Working towards a
Multi-Modal Transit
Center through grant
funds received for
design of the re-
establishment of rail
service in King City and
coordination with Fort
Hunter Liggett.

Working to improve
safety and circulation
with a roundabout on
the intersection of
Broadway St and San
Antonio Drive and the
northbound on-ramp to
Highway 101.

PPDraft Designs Electronic
Copy Attached
1001
3H Working on draft
ordinance to establish
reasonable
accommodation
procedures (i.e., that
does not require a CUP
or variance) to assist
people with disabilities
by ensuring equal
access to housing.

P Draft Ordinance Electronic
Copy Attached
1001
3I City funded grant
assistance program
Façade Improvement
Program to enhance
reface the
commercial/mixed-use
building facades
including on properties
within the Historic
Downtown Area that
include residential on
top floor and
commercial on the
bottom.

E Resolution 2017-4569 Electronic
Copy attached
Economic
Development
& Business
Assistance |
King, CA
1 0 0 1
4M City is providing a
portion of PLHA funding
to CHISPA for the
construction of 40 low
income apartment
units.

P Commitment Letter Electronic
Copy Attached
1 0 0 1
TOTAL 35 6 41
Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet
Note: This is a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet; an actual submission may include more specificity when an applicant completes the “Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy.” Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1B Permitted missing
middle housing uses by
allowing duplexes and
E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
3 6 1 4
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
triplexes by right in
existing low-density,
single-family residential
zones beyond what is
required by SB 9.
1C Sufficient sites to
accommodate 131
percent of the current
RHNA with rezoning by
total or income
category.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
2 1 2 4
1D Density bonus program
exceeds statutory
requirements by 12
percent.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
1F Eliminated parking
requirements for
residential development
as authorized by
Government Code
section 65852.2.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
1G Zoning that that is
designed to increase
affordable housing for a
range of types and for
extremely low-income
households.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
1H Modified development
standards/other
applicable zoning
provisions to allow for
residential uses in nonresidential zones (light
industrial).

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1L Other zoning and land
use actions that
measurably support the
Acceleration of Housing
Production.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
1 1
2B Streamlined programlevel CEQA analysis
and certification of
general plans,
community plans,
specific plans with
accompanying
Environmental Impact
Reports (EIR), and
related documents.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
2G Consolidated permit
processes that
minimize the levels of
review and approval
required for projects.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
2I Established a one-stopshop permitting
process.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
1 1 2 3
2N Other actions that
quantifiably decrease
production timeframes.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
3A Waiver of residential
development impact
fees.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
3 3
3B Adopted policies that
result in less restrictive
requirements than
Government Code
P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
2 1 2 4
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
sections 65852.2 and
65852.22.
3E Measures that reduce
costs for transportationrelated infrastructure.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
3I Other actions that
quantifiably reduce
construction or
development costs.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
1 1
4A Local housing trust
funds.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
4C Regular use of funding
for preserving assisted
units at-risk of
conversion to marketrate uses.

E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2 1 3
4E Establishes a program
that complies with the
Surplus Land Act and
offers below-market
land leases for
affordable housing.

E Zoning code 2 2
4G Prioritization of local
general funds for
affordable housing.

E Zoning code 2 2
4M Other actions that
leverage financial
resources for housing.

E Zoning code 1 1
TOTAL 33 12 45
Appendix 4: Examples of Prohousing Policies with Enhancement Factors If a Prohousing Policy incorporates any of the enhancement factors specified in the Project Proposal Enhancement Factors chart, it will receive extra points as indicated therein.

Examples of such qualifying Prohousing Policies include the following:

Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
• Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in Location Efficient Communities.
• Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Rezoning to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations. • Expanding density bonus programs to exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more in Location Efficient Communities.
• Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2 in Location Efficient Communities. • Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit Law in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
• Coupling rezoning actions with policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower-income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower-income households.

Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes • Ministerial approval processes for multifamily housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of specific plans in Location Efficient Communities.
• Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level in downtown commercial corridors and other infill locations. • Expedited permit processing for housing affordable to lower-income households in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs • Fee waivers for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Fee waivers or reductions for higher density housing in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
• Measures that reduce costs and leverage financial resources for transportation-related infrastructure or programs in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Adoption of universal design ordinances to increase housing choices and affordability for persons with disabilities in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Permitting innovative housing types, such as manufactured homes, recreational vehicles or park models, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
• Targeting local housing trust funds to acquisition or rehabilitation of existing affordable units, or to affordable units at risk of converting to market rate uses, in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Marketing grants and other financial products for ADUs/JADUs in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Utilizing publicly owned land for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool in a Low Resource or High Segregation & Poverty area (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Directing residual redevelopment funds or general funds to conservation or preservation of affordable housing in areas at high risk of displacement.

Appendix 5: Additional Information and Supporting Documentation • 1D – Density Bonus Ordinance Commitment Letter / Draft Density Bonus Ordinance • 1H – Ordinance 722 and Ordinance 2015-715
• 1J – Draft Ordinance for Farmworker Employee Housing consistent with Health & Safety Code Section 17021.5 and 17021.6
• 1L – Providing connection to wastewater treatment services to Collegeville Seasonal Employee Housing Facility located outside of city limits Resolution No. 2017-4567 • 2B – Arboleda Specific Plan Resolution 4053 and Mills Ranch Specific Plan Resolution 05- 4127
• 2D – Building Permit Review Flowchart
• 3D – Draft Ordinance to allow mobile and manufactured homes in residential zones • 3E – Multi-Modal Transit Draft Concept Plans & Roundabout Draft Concept Plans • 3H - Draft Ordinance to establish reasonable accommodation procedures ‘ • 3H – City funded grant assistance program Façade Improvement Program Resolution 2017- 4569
• 4M – Commitment Letter for use of PLHA for proposed low-income units EXHIBIT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5030

A RESOLUTION OF CITY OF KING AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION

IN THE PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER

TO SIGN ALL DOCUMENTS RELATEDTO THE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the City of King (“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law. The City Manager is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King at a regular meeting thereof held on the 25 day of March, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED
__________________________
MIKE LEBARRE, Mayor
ATTEST
________________________________
ERICA SONNE, City Clerk

CITY OF KING
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
ROY SANTOS, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
I, ______________________________, City Clerk of the City of King, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of the Resolution passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King on the date and by the vote indicated herein Item No. 9(I)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DOREEN LIBERTO, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR

ROY SANTOS, CITY ATTORNEY
RE: APPROVAL OF LOAN DOCUMENT WITH CHISPA FOR THE

MILLS RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT UNDER

THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION PROGRAM
(PLHA)
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) authorize the City Attorney to approve the final Loan Agreement for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (“PLHA”) financing for CHISPA’s affordable housing project to be constructed at the following five addresses: 691 Brandywine Lane, 235 Ermosa Way, 147 Ermosa Way, 260 Legacy Drive, 164 Legacy Drive in a loan amount of one hundred and twenty-six thousand, one hundred and eighty six dollars and seventy-five cents ($126,186.25), and 2) authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to review and approve any and all documents related to this project.

BACKGROUND:

The Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA”) is a funding program that provides financial assistance to local government for eligible housing related projects to address the unmet housing needs of local communities. The City was allocated a total of $1,093,228 for the years 2019 to 2024. The allocations for the five-years will be used for low-income housing (i.e., CHISPA) and homeless assistance/homeless housing projects. The PLHA programs stipulate that the funding for the type of housing CHISPA will build must be a loan. The five-year PLHA program breakdown is:

Low-Income
Housing (CHISPA) $126,187.25
Homeless
Assistance $561,755.50

CITY COUNCIL

APPROVAL OF LOAN DOCUMENT FOR CHISPA MILLS RANCH PROJECT MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 3
Homeless Housing $351,794.00
Administration $53,491.25
Subtotal $1,093,228.00
A Loan Agreement must be entered into between the City and CHISPA before allocation of any money. The Loan Agreement had to be reviewed and approved by the State Housing and Community Development Department (“HCD”).

DISCUSSION:

On August 30, 2005, the City Council approved the Mills Ranch Specific Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map. To comply with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, the project needed to include 15% inclusionary housing for lowincome households. This required the project provide 60 affordable housing units. In 2006 the City Council entered into the Mills Ranch Affordable Housing Program Agreement which allowed the developer to provide 10%, or at least 40 units, as affordable housing onsite. The remaining 5% obligation was met by providing $605,000 to the Housing Authority to rehab Leo A. Meyer Senior Plaza.

Five parcels were identified in the Mills Ranch Specific Plan for the 40 or more affordable housing units. CHISPA acquired the five parcels and will be constructing the affordable housing units on them. Their intent is to obtain government funding and tax credits to construct the units.

On May 24, 2022, the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a Loan Agreement approving a 55-year loan under the PLHA program be provided to Chispa. The Loan Agreement is between the City and CHISPA and loans $126,186.25 of PLHA funds at 3% simple interest rate, deferred for the 55-year term. The PLHA 2019 allocation is $33,546.25 and the 2020 PLHA allocation is $92,641 for a total allocation of $126,186.25. The loan document must be approved by the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). As of the writing of the staff report, HCD is still reviewing the document.

According to our grant consultant, the Loan Agreement needs to be in the files by April 2025 in order to release the 2019 allocations. Therefore, staff is recommending the City Council authorize the City Attorney to review and approve the final Loan Document with the 3% simple interest rate and deferred 55-year term. Since the City Manager lives within 500-feet of the CHISPA project, staff is requesting the City Council designate and authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to sign documents related to this project.

COST ANALYSIS:

There is no fiscal impact to the City for this loan.

Item No. 11 (A)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TO END YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council approve the proposed process for developing a second phase of the King City Comprehensive Plan to End Youth Violence.

BACKGROUND:

In 2016, the City Council formed a Community Task Force to develop a Comprehensive Plan to Address Youth Violence. The Community Task Force included 23 representatives from government agencies, public safety, non-profit organizations, and the community at large. The King City Comprehensive Plan to End Youth Violence was adopted by the City Council on January 24, 2017. A copy of the updated plan is attached as Exhibit 1.

The plan includes 5 categories of recommendations, which are prevention, intervention, enforcement, re-entry, and public outreach. The Community Task Force reviewed each category, identified existing programs to better coordinate and expand them, and then identified recommended programs and implementation strategies. The Plan also included measures for evaluation, tracking and updates.

Almost all the measures were implemented, and the immediate results were dramatic. Overall shootings dropped from 32 to 1 the first year and 0 the second year. In addition, the community response and involvement were very positive.

Information provided by the community regarding incidents involving violence increased significantly, which assisted the Police Department to increase cases solved. It was recognized with the Helen Putnam Award for Excellence by the League of California Cities and a summary brochure is attached as Exhibit 2.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END

YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 6
However, gang violence has been steadily increasing since the pandemic, which threatens our youth, the public’s safety and everyone's quality of life. As a result, staff are proposing the City initiate a second phase of the Comprehensive Plan to End Youth Violence to expand the efforts and continue working toward the ultimate goal of eliminating gang activity and youth violence.

DISCUSSION:

The data below presents King City’s history of shooting activity over the last 13 years.

Homicides
2012 2
2013 5
2014 0
2015 5
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 4
2022 1
2023 0
2024 5
2025 1
Attempted Homicides
2012 4
2013 7
2014 7
2015 11
2016 11
2017 14
2018 0
2019 0
2020 2
2021 4
2022 14
2023 12
2024 17
2025 0

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END

YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 3 OF 6
Other Shootings
2012 8
2013 1
2014 1
2015 12
2016 2
2017 15
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 3
2022 8
2023 2
2024 2
2025 0
Total Shootings
2012 12
2013 13
2014 8
2015 17
2016 15
2017 32
2018 1
2019 0
2020 3
2021 11
2022 23
2023 14
2024 24
2025 1
Below is a graph showing the history of total shootings per year:

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END

YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 4 OF 6
Data for 2024 includes the mass shooting, so it is inflated by one incident, but it is clear the trend is at an unacceptable level.

Staff are recommending the City undertake a similar process of forming a community task force to develop a plan to supplement the original Comprehensive Plan to End Youth Violence. The following steps are proposed:
• Development of preliminary research, analysis and recommendations by staff
• Formation of Task Force and initiation of meetings
• Task Force review of the existing plan and determination where existing programs can increase effectiveness by expanding and/or modifying • Present initial staff analysis and conceptual recommendations for new programs
• Task Force discussion and deliberation of staff recommendations • Task Force discussion and deliberation of additional ideas from the Task Force and public
• Prioritization of recommendations based on impact and feasibility • Preparation of implementation strategies
• Completion and presentation of final report to the City Council for consideration
Staff’s preliminary recommendations for the representation on the Community Task Force include the following:
• Mayor (Task Force Chair)
• Council Member
• City Manager
• Police Chief
• Recreation Department
• South Monterey County Joint Union High School District • King City Union School District
• Hartnell College
• County of Monterey Behavioral Health
• County Sheriff’s Department
• County Probation Department
• Sol Treasures
• Sun Street Centers
• ProYouth
• First Tee
• First Baptist Church

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END

YOUTH VIOLENCE PHASE II PLAN
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 5 OF 6
• St. John the Baptist Catholic Church
• Fundamentalist Baptist Church
• King City Culture Academy
• Girls, Inc.
• King City Boxing Club
The purpose of the process will be: 1) to develop a plan of measures that will be effective in creating a dramatic impact on the reduction and future elimination of gang activity and youth violence; 2) to engage and involve the entire community in both the planning and implementation effort; and 3) to identify, support and incorporate other existing and planned efforts to create a coordinated and extensive overall movement. The meetings will be open to the public and opportunities for public input will be provided.

Since youth violence is a regional problem, success will also depend on regional strategies and measures. Discussions are under way to coordinate such an effort, but it has not yet been defined or agreed upon. It is recommended the City participate in and advocate for regional activities. The City’s Task Force is proposed to focus on the local plan to achieve involvement and buy-in from the community and to ensure tangible and timely results are achieved. However, the membership is designed to include several individuals who will participate in regional efforts, who can then help link, coordinate and reinforce the results of the local and regional efforts in two complimentary tracts.

The following timeline is proposed as follows:

Staff research and formation of Task Force April
Begin meeting May
Review of existing plan May
Presentation and review of staff analysis June – July
Identify and deliberate Task Force and public ideas July – August Prioritize proposed measures August – September
Implementation plan September – October
Finalize and present report October
COST ANALYSIS:

The process will be coordinated by in-house staff. It is recommended the City Council budget $2,500 for the process to fund refreshments and supplies. The results of the planning effort will likely involve a substantial investment, but the costs and funding strategies will be determined through the implementation plan.

KING CITY
C' A L 1 F O R N I

CITY OF KING

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TO END YOUTH VIOLENCE

ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 24, 2017

UPDATED BY CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 23, 2018
JANUARY 22, 2019
EXHIBIT 1

KING CITY ABOUT
15,000 approximately of community Friendly O
people
plcturesque southern the In located Ideally C)
Valley Salinas
Monterey Park, National Pinnacles 0 Near
Fort Garrison y Arm U.S. region, wine County
history in rich area an and Liggett, Hunter
John of writings the by famous made
Steinbeck
hillsides, surrounding of views Beautiful 0
quaint a and streets, neighborhood tree-lined
historic downtown
Hometo: C)
hospital art State-of-the ►
course golf I Municipa ►
complex pool Swimming ►
airport Municipal ►
campus satellite college Community ►
schools public Five ►
Theatre Stanton ►
Fairgrounds Valley Salinas ►
and Campground Park, Lorenzo San ►
Rural and Agricultural County Monterey
History Museum Life

CITY KING

CHALLENGES
2012-2017 Between
17murders
capita per 2013 Highest
California in rate murder
and poverty h g Hi
unemployment
shootings 110
r-r-r r r- r- r r r
FFPFFFPPFr
FFFFFFPPFP"'
FFF�FFPFF,, FFFrP""F>PFP
>FFifffFFP
trl P F F F P P F F

IJPFPFFPFFF

RESPONSE
community 23-member
appointed force task
''''
''''
"''
''''
''''
'''

RESULTS
£!lB!I&
-
most Second
distressed financially
Callfomla In city
2014 In
Plan Comprehensive
Violence Youth End to
Coundl by adopted
2017 In
measures 24 of 19
2018 by under way
In 32 from decreased Shootings
2019 in o and 2018, In to 1 2017
,,. ,,..,,.,,..,..
�2m--�
NII
in reduction 60% over
debt General Fund
illion m $2 2019
- I
model PIER on based Plan
Outreach Community and
categories crime other All
significantly down
�
.,;; .a
In Increase 45%
solved cases
�
EXHIBIT 2

Item No. 11 (B)

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: MARCH 25, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
RE: CONSIDERATION OF KING CITY GOLF COURSE

RESTORATION PROJECT PROCESS AND AMENDMENT TO

OPERATION CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FIRST

TEE MONTEREY COUNTY
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council: 1) provide direction to staff to proceed with an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to amend the project cost estimate for the King City Golf Course restoration project; and 2) approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the contract services agreement with First Tee Monterey County for operation and management of the King City Golf Course; and 3) authorize the City Manager to make non-substantive changes as necessary in a form approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

At the October 11, 2022 meeting, the City Council approved an agreement with First Tee Monterey County to operate the King City Golf Course beginning November 1, 2022. The Council then approved an amended agreement at the November 8, 2022 meeting to address issues with the landscape maintenance contract.

The 2023 winter floods caused substantial damage to the Golf Course, which has had a significant impact on the operations and revenues. The agreement was amended in January 2024 to increase the payments to First Tee to address a portion of the financial impact. Those payments expired at the end of 2024. First Tee has continued to operate the Golf Course at a loss through 2024 due to the damage to the facility, so they are requesting additional financial assistance this year. Since their revenue comes from donors who are making contributions for

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF KING CITY GOLF COURSE RESTORATION PROJECT

PROCESS AND AMENDMENT TO OPERATION CONTRACT SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH FIRST TEE MONTEREY COUNTY
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 2 OF 6
the purpose of funding youth programming, they do not feel they can continue to utilize the donor money to subsidize operation of the Golf Course in the future.

Staff and representatives of the First Tee administration met to discuss how to best address and balance their financial constraints with the City’s budget limitations. A proposed additional amendment to the contract services agreement with First Tee is being presented for consideration along with potential options.

Staff have been working since the floods to coordinate a restoration project. The design is complete, and applications have been submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for funding assistance. It has been a slow and complex process. Bids were solicited and only two bids were received.

The low bid is substantially above the engineer’s estimate, which was used in the FEMA application. FEMA is ready to proceed to allocate the funding, but it would be based on the engineer’s estimate, not the actual bid. Their typical process is to address cost increases at the end when the project is complete. Requesting an update to the project cost estimate will delay the project. Staff are presenting options and a recommendation for proceeding.

DISCUSSION:

Several recommended amendments to the operation contract services agreement have been negotiated to address the ongoing losses due to the flooding damage. The drafted amendment is attached as Exhibit 1.

First, it is proposed that the City assume responsibility for the cost of any operating losses in the future beginning on April 1, 2025 until the restoration project is complete, but not pay any additional subsidy to First Tee for the period of January 1, 2024 through March 2025. Once the restoration project is complete, the subsidy will be eliminated entirely.

Second, the current agreement calls for First Tee and the City to equally share any profits from the Golf Course. To address First Tee’s operating losses during the past 15 months, it is proposed that the cost sharing provision not become effective until First Tee receives profits equal to the total amount of their loss, which is estimated to be $337,500.

Third, to ensure losses remain within the projected amounts, it is proposed to place a cap on operating expenses at no more than 10% above the proposed operating budget. Any expenditures above that amount will not be included in the calculation of net loss at the end of the year.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF KING CITY GOLF COURSE RESTORATION PROJECT

PROCESS AND AMENDMENT TO OPERATION CONTRACT SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH FIRST TEE MONTEREY COUNTY
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 3 OF 6
Fourth, when construction of the course commences, it may impact ongoing revenues and increase the cost to the City. At that time, the City will retain the right in its sole discretion to direct First Tee to modify hours of operation or temporarily close the Golf Course to reduce costs. If there is a substantial reduction, it would be staff’s recommendation to modify hours or close the Golf Course at that time on a temporary basis.

Fifth, First Tee has requested to extend the agreement by 5 years, which is currently scheduled to expire in December 2027. This would be needed to recoup their costs. Staff have been pleased with their operation of the Golf Course and recommend the extension.

In order to protect the City as best as possible from the potential of expending funding on the Golf Course restoration project and then not receiving full reimbursement from FEMA, it is recommended to request modification to the allocation to include the full amount of the bid. FEMA has indicated this could restart the process from the beginning and create a delay of 6 to 8 months. To expedite the process, staff has requested the assistance of the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) and Congresswoman Lofgren’s Office. Both have agreed to assist with the process. Based on the feedback received, staff believe the delay can be reduced significantly.

Bids received are for the restoration of the Golf Course and irrigation improvements only. There is a separate and concurrent project to replace the two bridges. Bids have not yet been solicited for the replacement of the bridges.

One additional issue of concern is whether the FEMA reimbursement can be structured so that reimbursements are provided as the project proceeds. The normal FEMA process only provides reimbursements at the end when construction is completed. It is typical for the City to up front the funding for grant funded projects, and it usually has the cash reserves to do that without it creating a financial issue for the City. However, this is a much larger project than the City has funded in the past and the turnaround time for FEMA reimbursement can often take up to several years. Therefore, utilizing that process would create a significant strain on the City’s cash balance. State OES has indicated that there is a process for larger projects to provide reimbursements on an incremental basis during the construction period, and they believe the City will qualify in this case. Staff recommend the contract be awarded only after this is confirmed. If it were not approved, staff would recommend the bids be rejected and the project be reevaluated.

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF KING CITY GOLF COURSE RESTORATION PROJECT

PROCESS AND AMENDMENT TO OPERATION CONTRACT SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH FIRST TEE MONTEREY COUNTY
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 4 OF 6
COST ANALYSIS:

The cost of the increased subsidy to the operation of the Golf Course is estimated to be $15,000 per month for approximately 12 to 15 months.

Therefore, the total cost to the City is projected to be $180,000 to $250,000.

It is projected that this could be reduced by approximately $50,000 to $55,000 if the course were open only on 2 to 4 days per week. It is estimated that it could be reduced by $120,000 if the Golf Course is closed.

The Golf Course restoration project engineer’s estimates were as follows:

Golf Course restoration $4,217,872
Golf Course bridges $1,247,647
Total $5,465,519
The revised estimate based on the bids received is as follows:

Golf Course restoration $7,570,000
Golf Course bridges $1,247,647
Total $8,817,647
Therefore, the difference in costs that would be unallocated if the City decides to move forward with the project and address increased costs once construction is complete would be the following:

Projected total cost $8,817,647
Engineer’s estimate $5,465,519
Difference $3,352,128
For FEMA funded projects, the majority is reimbursed from FEMA, State OES funds a portion, and the City is responsible for a local match of 6.25%. In this case, if full funding is approved from FEMA and State OES, the City will still be responsible for $551,103. Therefore, the total projected cost to the City for the Golf Course through the upcoming period of construction will be as follows:

Operation $180,000 - $250,000
Construction $551,103
Total $731,103 - $801,103
The costs would all be paid from the City’s General Fund unappropriated fund balance. It would result in a significant reduction to the fund balance, but the City

CITY COUNCIL

CONSIDERATION OF KING CITY GOLF COURSE RESTORATION PROJECT

PROCESS AND AMENDMENT TO OPERATION CONTRACT SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH FIRST TEE MONTEREY COUNTY
MARCH 25, 2025
PAGE 5 OF 6
currently has sufficient funding to address the cost and maintain the fund balance within the City’s reserve policy of 20% of the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Operation of the Golf Course is not a “project” for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change to the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The environmental review process has been completed for the restoration project and the determination will be presented to the City Council for consideration when the award of bid is presented. No further action is required under CEQA for City Council action.

ALTERNATIVES:

The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:

1. Approve staff's recommendations;

2. Limit the hours of operation of the Golf Course to only Thursday – Sunday or Saturday – Sunday to reduce costs, which would negatively impact some of the increased business that First Tee has been able to generate and would create issues from people playing free on days it is closed;

3. Close the Golf Course until construction is complete to further reduce costs, which also further increase the issues identified for the second alternative;

4. Direct staff to proceed with awarding the bid for construction at this time and risk the potential of not receiving the unallocated funding amount;

5. Reject all bids and rebid the project to determine if the City could obtain additional and more competitive bids this time, but this could create problems in bidding in the future if the bids remained high and the City had to reject all bids a second time;

6. Rescope the project to reduce costs, but this will likely create a longer delay than the request to update the allocation amount;

7. Pursue sale of the Golf Course in order to eliminate the cost, which would eliminate eligibility for the FEMA funding and would require the project to be privately funded;

8. Pursue sale of the Golf Course property for some other type of development; or

9. Provide staff other direction.

Exhibits:

1. Second Amendment to Contract Services Agreement

2. First Tee Monterey County 2024 Financial Report

CITY OF KING

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT

FOR GOLF COURSE OPERATOR SERVICES
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein "Agreement") is made and entered into this ___ day of______, 2025, by and between the CITY OF KING, a California municipal corporation ("City") and Future Citizens Foundation DBA First Tee - Monterey County (herein "Operator").

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

Termination of Prior Agreement. The previous agreement entered into between the City and Operator executed on October 11, 2022, is hereby terminated and this Agreement shall supercede said agreement.

1. SERVICES OF OPERATOR

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Operator shall perform the work or services in operating the King City Golf Course ("Golf Course"), as set forth in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A". and in conformance with the "Special Requirements, King City Golf Course Maintenance Specifications attached hereto as Exhibit "B", both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Operator warrants that it has the experience and ability to perform all work and services required hereunder and that it shall diligently perform such work and services in a professional and satisfactory manner.

1.2 Compliance With Law. All work and services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction.

1.3 Licenses. Permits. Fees and Assessments. Operator shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by the Agreement, including a City business license.

1.4 Operator will determine all rates charged at the Golf Course (including but not limited to golf green fees, cart fees, driving range), but rates shall not exceed the mean of those charged by other public golf courses within a 65 mile driving distance from the King City Golf Course without City approval.

2. REMUNERATION

2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Operator or City shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Three Hundred and Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($375,000) ("Contract Sum") paid by City to Operator.
01222.0001/830296.l 1
EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT 2

King City City CouncilMarch 25, 2025

King City City Council
March 25, 2025