AGENDA
KINGSBURG CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING Council Chamber, 1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631 (559) 897-5821 www.cityofkingsburg-ca.gov
THE COUNCIL CHAMBER IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AT 100% CAPACITY.
Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 6pm
Invocation to be given by Pastor John Palms, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Laura North
6 P.M. REGULAR SESSION MEETING:
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Approve Agenda: Action by the Council to approve the agenda or to make modifications. Items that can be added to the agenda is constrained by State law.
3. Presentations:
None
4. Public Comments: This is the time for any citizen to come forward and address the City Council on any issue within its jurisdiction that is not listed on the Agenda. A maximum of five (5) minutes is allowed for each speaker.
5. Consent Calendar: Items considered routine in nature are to be placed on the Consent Calendar.
They will be considered as one item and voted upon in one vote unless individual consideration is requested. Each vote in favor of the Consent Calendar is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Approval of the Consent Calendar items include recitals reading ordinance(s) by titles(s) only and adoption of recommended action(s) contained in Staff Reports.
5.1 Approval of City Council Minutes: Approve the minutes from the June 15, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.
Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
City of Kingsburg
1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631-1908
Phone (559)897-5821 Fax (559)897-5568
Mayor Laura North
Mayor Pro Tem Vince Palomar
Council Member Michelle Roman
Council Member Jewel Hurtado
Council Member Brandon Pursell, Jr.
City Manager Alexander J. Henderson
Kingsburg City Council Agenda
July 20, 2022
5.2 Check Register: Ratify/approve payment of bills listed on the check register for the period June 7, 2022 through July 11, 2022 as prepared by Accounts Payable Clerk Marsha Alves.
Sponsor: Finance Department
5.3 Approve the Contract between Fresno County Fire Protection District and City of Kingsburg for Fire Dispatch- Staff Report by Fire Chief Daniel Perkins Sponsor: Fire Department
5.4 Public Safety Committee Appointment- Affirm Mayor North’s appointment of Brent Andersen to Public Safety Committee to a 4 year term that is set to expire November 2026.
Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
5.5 Award of the 2022 Slurry Seal Project to VSS International, Inc. in the amount of $175,000.00– Staff Report by City Engineer Dave Peters
Sponsor: City Engineer’s Office
6. Regular Calendar
6.1 Commercial Zoning Update - Proposed Scope of Work - Staff Report by Community Development Director Holly Owen
Sponsor: Community Development Department
Possible Action(s):
a. Presentation by Jerry Hittleman, Senior Planner- Rincon Consultants, Inc. b. Council Discussion
c. Action As Deemed Necessary
6.2 Water Conservation – Turf Replacement Program Update- Staff Report by Public Works Director Daniel Galvez.
Sponsor: Public Works Department
Possible Action(s):
a. Presentation by Public Works Director Daniel Galvez
b. Council Discussion
c. Informational- No Action Necessary
6.3 National Opioid Settlement Update- Staff Report by City Attorney Michael Noland.
Sponsor: City Attorney’s Office
Possible Action(s):
a. Presentation by City Attorney Michael Noland
b. Council Discussion
c. Action As Deemed Necessary
6.4 Crime Statistics Report for the Month of June 2022 and General Police Department Update- Crime Statistics Report prepared by Kingsburg Police Department Records Supervisor Corina Padilla.
Sponsor: Police Department
Possible Action(s):
a. Presentation by Police Chief Neil Dadian
b. Council Discussion
Kingsburg City Council Agenda
July 20, 2022
c. Informational- No Action Necessary
7. Council Reports and Staff Communications
7.1 Community Services Commission
7.2 Public Safety Committee
7.3 Chamber of Commerce
7.4 Economic Development
7.5 Finance Committee
7.6 Planning Commission
7.7 South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency Joint Powers Authority (SKGSA)
7.8 Downtown Business Improvement District
7.9 Council of Governments
-Measure C Renewal Update
7.10 Council Member Reports
7.11 City Manager’s Report
8. Future Agenda Items:
None
9. The Kingsburg City Council adjourns out of the Regular Calendar into Closed Session:
9.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
California Government Code Section 54957.6
City Designated Representative: Alexander Henderson
Employee Organization: Public Service Employees Association (KPSEA) Employee Organization: Kingsburg Police Officer Association (KPOA) Employee Organization: Kingsburg Professional Fire Association (KPFA) Employee Organization: Non-represented Employees
9.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
California Government Code Section 54956.8
Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel Number: APN: 394-042-04 City Negotiator: Alexander J. Henderson
Under Negotiation: Rental Terms and Conditions
9.3 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: City of Kingsburg street right-of-way in various locations within the City of Kingsburg.
City Negotiator: Alexander Henderson
Negotiation parties: Fiber-Optic Contractors
Under Negotiation: Terms and conditions of lease of City of Kingsburg street rightof-way for installation of fiber-optic cable.
10. Adjourn out of Close Session into Regular Kingsburg City Council Meeting and report out of Closed Session.
11. Adjourn Regular Kingsburg City Council Meeting.
Kingsburg City Council Agenda
July 20, 2022
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk’s office, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the City’s website at www.cityofkingsburg-ca.gov.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (559) 897-6520. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II].
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Agenda was posted at the front entrance of City Hall not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 15th day of July 2022.
____________________________________
Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk
JOINT MEETING OF THE KINGSBURG CITY COUNCIL, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
CITY OF KINGSBURG PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE KINGSBURG REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
June 15, 2022
Invocation was given by Pastor Pete Querin, New Life Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Laura North
6 P.M. REGULAR SESSION MEETING:
Call to Order and Roll Call: Mayor Laura North called the Joint Meeting of The Kingsburg City Council, Board of Directors of The City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority And Board of Directors of The Successor Agency of The Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency at 6:04 p.m.
Council Members present: Council Member Jewel Hurtado, Council Member Vince Palomar, Council Member Brandon Pursell Jr, Council Member Michelle Roman, Mayor Laura North.
City Staff present: City Manager Alex Henderson, City Attorney Michael Noland, Finance Director Alma Colado, Community Development Director Holly Owen, Police Chief Neil Dadian, Public Works Director Daniel Galvez and City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.
Approve Agenda: A motion was made by Council Member Palomar, seconded by Council Member Roman, to approve the agenda, as published. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote of those Council Members present.
Presentations: None.
Public Comments:
Michael Brewer, resident, spoke about pride month and the previous public comment. Residents are not abomination whether their race, creed or sexuality.
Approve Joint Meeting Agenda:
A motion was made by Council Member Brandon Pursell Jr., seconded by Council Member Vince Palomar, to approve the items appearing on the Joint Meeting Agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Joint Meeting Consent Calendar: A motion was made by Council Member Palomar, seconded by Council Member Roman, to approve the items appearing on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
(To be approved only by City Council)
5.1 Approval of City Council Minutes: Approve the minutes from the May 31, 2022, Regular City Council Meeting as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.
Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
5.2 Check Register: Ratify/approve payment of bills listed on the check register for the period May 9, 2022 through June 6, 2022 as prepared by Accounts Payable Clerk Marsha Alves.
Sponsor: Finance Department
Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
5.3 Approve the City of Kingsburg COVID-19 Prevention Plan.- Staff Report prepared by Administrative Services Director Christina Windover.
Sponsor: Administrative Services Department
5.4 Adopt Resolution 2022-040 adopting the Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines for VMT evaluations within the City of Kingsburg with a 13% threshold over existing VMT as the significance criteria for determining transportation impacts.- Staff Report prepared by City Engineer Dave Peters Sponsor: Engineering
5.5 Accept the infrastructure improvements to Tract 6306 and authorize the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion.- Staff Report prepared by City Engineer Dave Peters
Sponsor: Engineering
5.6 SB 1 Resolution FY 2022/23- Review the proposed project list and approve Resolution 2022-039 as presented. - Staff Report prepared by City Engineer Dave Peters Sponsor: Engineering
5.7 Authorize City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 of Agreement CDBG CV19392 and transmit the document to the County of Fresno for consideration by the Board of Supervisors.- Staff Report prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
(To be approved only by Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency)
5.8 Approval of Kingsburg Redevelopment Successor Agency Minutes - Approve the minutes from the regular meeting held on June 16, 2021 as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.
Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
(To be approved only by Board of Directors of the Kingsburg Public Financing Authority)
5.9 Approval of Kingsburg Financing Authority Minutes - Approve the minutes from the regular meeting held on June 16, 2021 as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.
Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
Regular Calendar
PUBLIC HEARING-Competitive Housing Allocations for Residential Development for 2022- Staff Report Prepared by Community Development Director Holly Owen (Action only by the City Council)
Sponsor: Community Development Department
Open Public Hearing: Mayor North opened the public hearing at 6:12 p.m.
Community Development Director Holly Owen said we are here tonight to consider awarding housing allocations in 2022. In November 2004 growth management system was voted in by the people of Kingsburg allowing 115 allocations per year. On May 12th the Planning Commission held a public Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
hearing and adopted resolution 2022 – 01 recommending housing allocations for two proposed projects (63 Lot Single Family Development (West Star Construction, applicant) and 51 Lot Single Family development (Bonadelle Homes, Inc., applicant)). Both projects are in the North Kingsburg Specific Plan area and the land that each project will be constructed will need to be annexed into the City of Kingsburg through the Fresno Lafco process.
Council Discussion: 6:15 p.m.
Mayor North said to the public, it may seem that the city is building a lot, but the Growth Management System is in effect. Some residents have concerns of being in a serious drought and adding more housing.
Community Development Director Owen said each project is put through environmental assessments and impacts to ensure we have enough water to sustain current and new housing developments. Council could decide for next year to not issue any allocations and can go throw the process.
OpenPublicComment: 6:23 p.m.
Jennifer Delinger, resident, asked if water pressure was a consideration in the environmental document process and how do we calculate when we will need another school.
City Engineer Peters said The Water Board requires water calculations for every subdivision and showing that ground supply can sustain them. The water pressure would have to do with the Public Works Department in adjusting some of the pumps.
Mayor North responded that we have empty classrooms in majority of our school. New affordable housing brings us more kids and welcome more students, more teachers, and more funding. Currently there is no issue needing another school.
.
ClosePublic Comment: 6:26 p.m.
Continued Council Discussion: 6:26 p.m.
Close Public Hearing: 6:26 p.m.
A motion was made by Council Member Pursell, Jr., seconded by Council Member Hurtado, to adopt Resolution 2022–034 awarding 114 housing units as the 2022 housing unit allocation. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARING - Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget Review-Consider 2022/2023 Fiscal Year Recommended ExecutiveBudget
Sponsor: City Manager’s Office
Open Public Hearing: 6:28 p.m.
City Manager Henderson presented the City Manager’s proposed FY2022/2023 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget. The FY23 All-Funds budget is ~$31.64M, an 19% increase over FY22. This increase can be attributed to the return of normal programming after two years of imposed or self-imposed reductions in forecasting COVID-19 impacts. We are projecting that our 7/1/23 All-Funds fund balance will be 9.55% higher when compared to the anticipated 7/1/22 fund balance. The budget also includes nearly $10M for fifty-seven (57) capital improvement projects, including $3.2M for the installation of a Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
fiber optic broadband network city-wide.
Council Discussion: 6:31 p.m.
Council Member Hurtado said there is a lot of hard work, you make it very user friendly. She appreciates to see the positive growth for the city. The format makes the budget accessible to our community. Mayor North said it is not a boring document, and you told a story of our town. She noted some changes to the names of festivals to be updated and that she would like to discuss spending parks and recreation funding for the Sports Complex and start capital fundraising. Council Member Palomar said he would like to add a shade structure for Heritage Park. Council discussed the benefit of the sports complex and fiber optics.
Council Member Pursell Jr. said it’s pretty and it looks great, it is also a sound document. Years of planning has gotten us to this point. Thank you.
OpenPublicComment: 6:37 p.m.
Michael Brewer, resident, asked about parks and recreation funding towards the dog park and where is that going.
Mayor North said the City received a grant from the State of California 1.2 million dollars for the dog park in it’s existing location off the freeway. Community Services Commission is helping to plan the project with City Council.
ClosePublicComment: 6:39 p.m.
Continued Council Discussion: 6:39 p.m.
Close Public Hearing: 6:39 p.m.
A motion was made by Council Member Pursell Jr., seconded by Council Member Roman, to adopt Resolution 2022-035 approving the City of Kingsburg 2022/2023 Fiscal Year Budget; including the Kingsburg Public Finance Authority and Kingsburg Redevelopment Successor Agency budgets. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARING-Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 93-01- Consider Approval of Engineer's Report and Levy and Collection of Assessments within such District for Fiscal Year 2022/2023- Staff Report Prepared by Finance Director Alma Colado (Action only by the City Council)
Sponsor: Finance Department
Open Public Hearing: Mayor North opened the public hearing at 6:41 p.m.
Finance Director Alma Colado said The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 authorizes cities to impose assessments on benefitted properties to finance construction of street landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, parks, street trees, sidewalk repair, and recreational improvements as well as maintenance and servicing of any of these improvements within public places within the boundaries of the District. The expenses incurred included servicing turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, irrigation lighting systems, entry monuments, walls, drainage systems, park facilities, and associated appurtenances located in public places within the boundaries of the District. The total levy is $107,803.13 for FY 2022/23, which is a $2,973.53 increase from the current fiscal year.
Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
Council Discussion: 6:43 p.m.
OpenPublicComment: 6:43 p.m.
ClosePublic Comment: 6:43p.m.
Continued Council Discussion: 6:43 p.m.
Close Public Hearing: 6:43 p.m.
Possible Action: A motion was made by Council Member Pursell, Jr., seconded by Council Member Palomar, adopt Resolution 2022-036 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the City’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessments Districts. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Community Facilities District 2017-01 FY 2022-2023 Levy- Staff Report prepared by City Manager Alexander Henderson
(Action only by the City Council)
Sponsor: City Manager’s Office
Valerie Merklin, Senior Associate at DTA, presented City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017- 023, entitled “Resolution of Formation of Kingsburg Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2017-01. The public services that will be financed by the CFD levy include, without limitation, police services, fire and ambulance and emergency response services, parks and open space maintenance, lighting and landscape maintenance, alley maintenance and repair, administrative fees of the City and reimbursement of costs related to the formation of CFD 2017-01 advanced by the City.
City Manager Henderson said all new developments since 2017 are annexed in to the CFD, it is an updated version of landscaping and lighting. Pays for services that are impacted by new development. It is dependent when they pull the actual permit.
Council discussed what it funds and that it is important new developments contribute. They discussed that the homes actually built in Tulare County can never be annexed in the City limits.
The Fresno County Summerlyn tax zone is higher so that they mirror the Tulare County Summerlyn tax zone.
A motion was made by Council Member Pursell, Jr., seconded by Council Member Hurtado, to adopt Resolution 2022-037 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Kingsburg, Acting in its Capacity as the Legislative Body of Community Facilities District No. 2017-1 (Public Services District) Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Gann Limit Adoption for 2022-2023 Fiscal Year Budget Figures-Staff Report Prepared by Finance Director Alma Colado
(Action only by the City Council)
Sponsor: Finance Department
Finance Director Alma Colado said each year the City Council must approve a resolution to adopt Gann Limit for the City for the new fiscal year budget figures using the County or City Growth percentage for Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
calculations. The 2022-23 Gann Limit based on budget figures are $19,575,348 and appropriations subject to limitations are $4,723,165 under the limit for the 2022-23 fiscal year budget $14,852,183. The City growth percentage is -.22% and the County percentage is .19%. The larger percentage gives us a higher limit.
A motion was made by Council Member Palomar, seconded by Council Member Hurtado, to adopt Resolution 2022-038 approving the Gann Limit calculation for 2022-23 Fiscal Year using the Fresno County Growth percentage. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Ordinance No. 2022-02, An Urgency Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City Of Kingsburg Temporarily Placing A Moratorium On The Issuance Of Land Use Entitlements And Permits Which Allow Professional Or Commercial Offices To Locate Within The Central Commercial District, Along Draper Street From Lincoln Street To California Street- Staff Report by Community Development Director Holly Owen
(Action only by the City Council)
Sponsor: Community Development Department
Community Development Director Holly Owen discussed that a large number of retail spaces in the downtown area along Draper Street which have been converted to commercial/business back-office space (as opposed to customer serving retail space). The recent sharp upturn in back-office uses have caused a noticeable shortage of on-street customer parking for existing customer serving retail businesses along Draper Street. The Urgency Ordinance is to place a moratorium on the issuance of land use entitlements and permits which allow professional or commercial offices to locate within the Central Commercial District, along Draper Street from Lincoln Street to California Street.
Public Comment:
Sherman Dix, resident and a building owner on Draper. Has an issue with the ordinance- most concerned it is an urgency – it should be a threat of health and safety. He is for encouraging as much retail to Draper including incentives. Opposed to the city limiting of the zoning. Quality foot traffic will assist retail. Expenses of converting older buildings in to restaurants is high. Asked why there hasn’t been collaboration with building owners. There is a recession on the horizon and this is the wrong process with good intentions. Discussed office vs retail. Mayor North asked what incentives would help bring in retail? Mr. Dix said incentives for tenants for particular types of businesses, like the City’s façade grants.
Jeanette Akers, resident, who presented this idea of moratorium? Mayor North said business owners have approached Council. Council Member Roman said planners that came in to town recommended it as did the Economic Development Commission. Ms. Akers asked what is the purpose of this ordinance if it came from people from out of town? Mayor North said business owners have approached Council, buildings come up and they are leased as office space. Ms. Akers said we need more events and venues.
Steve Safarjian, business owner, has been a Draper Street business for over 32 years as an office. He is also a building owner on Draper. The Economic Development Committee has been working on this for decades- a healthy downtown is a mix. Office space is in demand. The best interest is to stop and research. We can take a 45 day period to look at it to see if there is a solution.
Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
Jolene Polyack, Economic Development Consultant and resident, this has been a directive since she has started. It is only 3 blocks on Draper. The reason is an east coast developer was going to locate 50 brokers on Draper. 45 day moratorium will allow for us to discuss the future of downtown.
Council Member Pursell Jr. asked about the retail and restaurants. Why are they not beating out the office spaces? Consultant Polyack said it is easier to rent for office space.
Leslie Carpenter, resident and a business owner and BID Board Member, said we formed the BID to promote retail and our city. I do understand property owners. Would love to have them come sit down and have a conversation. I do support this pause for one reason so we can gather all the tools and make the best decisions.
June Hess, resident and business owner, this town is now a destination town. We are unique and we need to keep our uniqueness.
Jennifer Delinger, resident, business owner, landlord of one block on Draper. Tries to rent to retail, she works hard for her money and would not like Council to tell her who to rent to. Doesn’t want to be told by any part of government what she can do with her property. She is for incentives for retail.
Mayor North asked about business spaces upstairs.
Michelle Buckner, resident and business owner, concerned that the city would tell business owners what they can or cannot do. We are just getting back our income and may be going into a recession. It will cost more with the cost of building out. When she first got here Council was asking businesses to come on to Draper and didn’t say what kind. Now there are trying to say what kind of business.
Michael Brewer, resident, valid points on both sides, Kingsburg is unique. Having retail would be important but understand the landlord’s side. Sees why a 45 day moratorium is a good idea to pause and collaborate.
Council Member Pursell, Jr is opposed to the Urgency Ordinance. Mayor North said the government overreach she opposes, but supports doing something as a collaboration. Council Member Roman said there are some businesses that are for it. Building owners have been against it, but she understands that something needs to be done. We don’t want our downtown area to be office space. We want people to eat and shop down here. We are good at working together to find a solution.
Council Member Hurtado asked if there is an existing tenant space, can you rent it to another office space. City Manager Henderson said yes, this is to stop the retail spaces from going to office. Council Member Hurtado said we have spoken about parking- is there some type of urgency with parking if we don’t pass this? Can we do something about parking? Council Member Pursell, Jr. said we don’t have timed parking. Council Member Roman said we don’t want our police officers downtown writing tickets, we want them out fighting crime. She is torn on a decision.
Council Member Palomar said I don’t buy items on amazon; he goes to stores. Has also seen a lot of office space. If we adopt it, business owners will need to sit down with city staff. No easy answer.
Council Member Hurtado said we understand that it is rights being taken away, this is a small commitment to see if it will work. Mayor North said she understands that if we pass this, the building owners that are losing retail leases will have the potential to not have renters for 45 days. Covid isn’t gone, we know a downturn is coming. We were begging for businesses to come down. Not sure if the 45 day is the right thing. She would like to have a public hearing in and invite the building owners.
She is not comfortable will with the 45 days and then pushing it 1 year and then 1 year, It is pushing Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
the can down the line.
Council Member Pursell, Jr. would love to see downtown to be balanced but he is not willing to do this on the back of the building owners. It is a reduction of the property owner’s rights. Will do anything with in our rights to protect our brand. Doesn’t think this applies to the definition of what an urgency ordinance is. To infringe on the rights for a want is a slippery slope. It is a hard no but wants to continue with this conversation. Let’s move forward with the conversation of parking.
Council Member Hurtado asked when it comes to the specifically of the ‘urgency’ of this, how does this qualify?
City Attorney Noland said the issue that we have with the regards of the ordinance. Health and safetyin a broader aspect, looking at this area as a whole of the welfare of the city. How this section of Draper will be populated as whole, broader aspect of welfare. Basis upon which to adopt it on the definition. Mayor North asked a loss of sales tax to support public safety? City Attorney Noland said that is one of them. Mayor North said which hasn’t happened yet.
Council Member Pursell Jr. said financial welfare where we just approved the budget that is healthy. Is all for going through the proper process for re-zoning. Doesn’t want to shortcut the process.
City Manager Henderson said for clarification it is not just the city’s dollars that we are talking about, it is also the general welfare of the businesses. Staff will take the responsibility for bringing this to tonight. Even if you pass this, we won’t figure this out in 45 days. After holding a public hearing, you can extend it, and it doesn’t have to pushed forward for a whole year. The question for council is this conversation with the moratorium, or without it. We will have to make zoning changes over time and we are working with COG.
Council Member Roman said if you have a current office space, this would not change it. She is not against find incentives for adding retail. We’ll will have this discussion sooner than later Council Member Hurtado agrees with not telling building owners what to do, especially after coming off a pandemic. How long will it take without this?
City Manager Henderson said so many options, 6-9 months. Hard to pin point how long it will take.
Council Member Hurtado said it is going to take a long time no matter what. If we put a hold, it is just for a possible 50 person in the office.
Council Member Pursell, Jr. said there is a due process, and the building owners are due their due process to go through the proper zoning process. Mayor North said when the zoning process starts, we will do public hearings, correct? City Attorney Noland said yes.
Council Member Palomar said if we do adopt it, this process this will potentially 6-9 months. What happens after 45 days? City Manager Henderson said if the ordinance is passed, we would plan a public hearing, and then could extend it.
Mayor North asked if we don’t pass it today, can we start this conversation in July? City Manager Henderson said yes, and we would still have a public hearing.
Council Member Hurtado wants to talk about parking and incentives.
Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
Mayor North said she is not in favor of 45 days, but is for a public hearing in July.
Council Member Pursell, Jr. motioned, seconded by Council Member Palomar, to not adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-02. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Council directed staff to bring it back in July to look at the zoning and incentives and include property owners. Council asked for the public to send in their solutions and for parking.
Crime Statistics Report for the Month of May 2022 and General Police Department UpdateCrime Statistics Report prepared by Kingsburg Police Department Records Supervisor Corina Padilla.
Sponsor: Police Department
Police Chief Neil Dadian gave an update in catalytic converter thefts, they are up. In regards to the robbery at Arco in March, detectives are working on it. Bank robbery update- the suspect has been captured and cash has been returned. Update on the attempted homicide last month, a son stabbed his mother. Graffiti update. Update on hiring and training. Spoke about billing for forest fires. Preparing for upcoming billing for support for state responses. Officer Nissi Robledo spearheaded the Special Olympic torch run with donations. Tip of the hat for the KPOA.
Council Member Palomar thanked Chief for sending the email to his officers on the expectation on active shooters, to engage until the threat is down. Mayor Laura North thanked the police department for sending the officers to the schools for the last week of school.
Council Reports and Staff Communications
Community Services Commission: Mayor Laura North said they have not met.
Public Safety Committee: Council Member Vince Palomar said they have not met Chamber of Commerce: Mayor Laura North said they spoke about the emergency ordinance, talked about Fresno Street Eats. Well attended event, didn’t have enough vendors and it pushed push patrons down Draper, so those businesses were busy also.
Economic Development: Council Member Michelle Roman said they have not met.
Finance Committee: Council Member Brandon Pursell Jr. said they have not met.
Planning Commission: Mayor Laura North said they have not met South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency Joint Powers Authority (SKGSA): Mayor Laura North said they have not met
Downtown Business Improvement District: Council Member Jewel Hurtado said they met this week to discuss photos from the Swedish festival, they are going to reach out to community members for photos.
Council of Governments: Council Member Michelle Roman said they meets next week Council Member Reports: Council Member Michelle Roman said they there is a regional program for jobs, and other investments. We could get more funds for our area. Thank you for the voters for Measure Z passing. Mayor Laura North said Tuesday at 8:45am kick off the state meet at the Gun Club.
Kingsburg City Council, City of Kingsburg Public Financing Authority and Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the Kingsburg Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting Minutes June 15, 2022
City Manager’s Report- City Manager Henderson reminded Council of the cancelation of the 7/6/2022 City Council Meeting
Future Agenda Items- None.
Submitted by:
____________________________________
Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
marshaa
7/12/2022 4:05 PM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
81554 3067 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/07/2022 12,065.14
Total for 6/7/2022: 12,065.14
81555 4267 ACTIVE 911 06/09/2022 611.00
81556 3565 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 06/09/2022 1,137.12
81557 4545 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 06/09/2022 20.68
81558 4703 ART OF HOME IMPROVEMENT 06/09/2022 400.00
81559 3029 AT&T CALNET 3 06/09/2022 707.81
81560 3300 AVENU INSIGHTS & ANALYTICS 06/09/2022 60.06
81561 4694 BALANCED COMFORT 06/09/2022 14,667.00
81562 3902 BLOOMING BELLE MARKETING 06/09/2022 1,389.61 81563 3063 CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOC 06/09/2022 145.00 81564 4429 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC 06/09/2022 424.41 81565 3831 ADAM CASTANEDA 06/09/2022 1,483.83
81566 3074 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 06/09/2022 861.67
81567 4556 CENTURION COIN & EMBLEM 06/09/2022 752.93
81568 3918 CINTAS 06/09/2022 1,279.70
81569 3152 E C N POLYGRAPH & INVEST 06/09/2022 200.00
81570 4698 ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS INTERNATIONAL INC 06/09/2022 311.02 81571 4615 EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES 06/09/2022 328.71
81572 3166 FALCON TIRE & TOWING 06/09/2022 300.00
81573 3693 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 06/09/2022 1,014.34 81574 3184 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE-Business Office 06/09/2022 939.00 81575 3188 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF 06/09/2022 34,650.80
81576 4508 GEMT QAF,Accounting Section/ 06/09/2022 10,560.72 81577 3219 HEALTHWISE SERVICES 06/09/2022 173.75
81578 3222 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 06/09/2022 384.76
81579 4585 ISIDRO HERRERA 06/09/2022 225.00
81580 3999 IRON MOUNTAIN 06/09/2022 42.40
81581 3520 IRVINE & JACHENS, INC 06/09/2022 331.03
81582 3248 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP 06/09/2022 5,500.00 81583 3249 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC06/09/2022 5,410.54 81584 3686 KINGSBURG AUTO CARE 06/09/2022 379.98
81585 3253 KINGSBURG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE06/09/2022 2,500.00 81586 3254 KINGSBURG CHEVRON 06/09/2022 275.00
81587 3510 KINGSBURG TOWING 06/09/2022 1,980.00
81588 3266 BRENT KROEGER 06/09/2022 39.79
81589 4081 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 06/09/2022 2,042.19
81590 3784 LEXIPOL, LLC 06/09/2022 5,194.45
81591 3277 LINCOLN AQUATICS 06/09/2022 5,632.90
81592 3288 MCCLASKEY, INC. 06/09/2022 6,930.00
81593 3293 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL 06/09/2022 113,704.24
81594 3797 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 06/09/2022 70,585.03 81595 3466 NAPA AUTO PARTS 06/09/2022 458.04
81596 3307 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE 06/09/2022 1,235.23
81597 3793 NVB EQUIPMENT, INC 06/09/2022 1,046.73
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/12/2022 4:05 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
81598 3611 HOLLY OWEN 06/09/2022 35.00
81599 3315 P G & E 06/09/2022 1,761.21
81600 3450 ABIGAIL PALSGAARD 06/09/2022 35.00
81601 3319 KEVIN PENDLEY 06/09/2022 52.47
81602 3321 PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP 06/09/2022 119,120.58 81603 3326 PITNEY BOWES 06/09/2022 222.40
81604 4030 PRINT THEORY 06/09/2022 31.13
81605 3334 PROFESSIONAL PRINT & MAIL, INC 06/09/2022 214.70 81606 4705 SERVICE MASTER BY BENEVENTO 06/09/2022 100.00 81607 3368 SIGN RANCH BY ROD'S CUSTOM SIGNS06/09/2022 296.95 81608 3369 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC. 06/09/2022 11,028.45 81609 4697 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING 06/09/2022 177.00 81610 3378 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 06/09/2022 2,345.24
81611 3380 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-D O J 06/09/2022 1,090.00 81612 3385 STRYKER SALES CORPORATION 06/09/2022 439.06
81613 4028 SUPERIOR POOL CARE 06/09/2022 3,988.49
81614 3484 SWANK MOTION PICTURE, INC. 06/09/2022 2,520.00 81615 4016 ULINE Shipping Supplies Specialist 06/09/2022 1,244.67 81616 3419 VIKING CLEANING SERVICE 06/09/2022 3,500.00
81617 3493 VILLAGE TIRE SALES 06/09/2022 64.43
81618 4287 VSS INTERNATIONAL, INC 06/09/2022 1,854.07
81619 3469 WECO SUPPLY CO., INC. 06/09/2022 33.48
81620 3448 CHRISTINA WINDOVER 06/09/2022 35.00
81621 3430 WONG, ANDY & BETTY 06/09/2022 2,600.00
Total for 6/9/2022: 449,105.80
ACH 3231 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP - WIRE 457 06/17/2022 1,283.65 ACH 3470 Internal Revenue Service - ACH 06/17/2022 56,658.46 ACH 3471 Employment Development Department - ACH06/17/2022 10,322.81 ACH 3472 CalPERS - ACH 06/17/2022 45,893.71
ACH 3475 Empower 06/17/2022 3,564.55
ACH 3476 CHILD SUPPORT STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - ACH 06/17/2022 240.46 ACH 3526 Public Employees Retirement System 457 Plan-Deferred Comp - ACH 06/17/2022 333.96 Total for 6/17/2022: 118,297.60
ACH 3221 ALEX HENDERSON 06/23/2022 1,143.57
1 4707 ICMA-WIRE 401(A) 06/23/2022 250.00
81622 3005 AFLAC 06/23/2022 766.70
81623 3006 AIRGAS NCN 06/23/2022 997.02
81624 4712 ALLIANCE ENVIROMENTAL GROUP 06/23/2022 129.00 81625 4532 ALTA TESTING SERVICES 06/23/2022 165.00
81626 3565 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 06/23/2022 347.14
81627 4545 AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. 06/23/2022 477.21
81628 3891 AMERICAN BUSINESS MACHINES 06/23/2022 15.00
81629 4307 AT & T MOBILITY 06/23/2022 1,982.24
81630 3043 BETTS TRUCK PART'S & SERVICE 06/23/2022 1,489.02 81631 4714 ERIN BUNNELL 06/23/2022 200.00
81632 3056 CAL STATE TERMITE AND PEST 06/23/2022 460.00 81633 4429 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC 06/23/2022 1,584.59 81634 3077 CENTRAL VALLEY OVERHEAD DOOR 06/23/2022 190.00 81635 4713 KATRINA CHARLES 06/23/2022 25.00
81636 4710 DAVE CHRISTIAN 06/23/2022 1,656.57
81637 4385 CPSI 06/23/2022 19,224.47
81638 3142 DELRAY TIRE & RETREADING 06/23/2022 3,204.72 81639 4534 DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 06/23/2022 145.08
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/12/2022 4:05 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
81640 3148 DON BERRY CONSTRUCTION 06/23/2022 23,564.01
81641 3149 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. 06/23/2022 4,937.16 81642 4615 EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES 06/23/2022 1,301.76 81643 3158 ENER POWER 06/23/2022 3,437.00
81644 3187 FRESNO COUNTY DEPT OF COMM. HE 06/23/2022 2,154.75 81645 3188 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF 06/23/2022 18,369.56
81646 4664 FRESNO PLUMBING & HEATING 06/23/2022 289.90
81647 3197 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT 06/23/2022 72.00
81648 3640 RICHARD GORDON 06/23/2022 200.00
81649 3222 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 06/23/2022 1,336.37
81650 4650 INTERWEST 06/23/2022 22,515.00
81651 4250 J.S. SIGNS 06/23/2022 200.00
81652 3534 JACK'S REFRIGERATION, INC. 06/23/2022 2,640.22 81653 3237 JCS LAND MANAGEMENT 06/23/2022 6,200.00
81654 3242 JOE SAUBERT INC. 06/23/2022 382.62
81655 UB*00053 KIMBLEY'S FLOORING 06/23/2022 116.16
81656 3887 KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCC. MED CTR., INC. 06/23/2022 2,549.59 81657 3686 KINGSBURG AUTO CARE 06/23/2022 721.27
81658 3253 KINGSBURG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE06/23/2022 17,000.00 81659 3625 KINGSBURG MEDIA FOUNDATION 06/23/2022 5,149.03 81660 3259 KINGSBURG SUPERMARKET, INC. 06/23/2022 414.37 81661 4687 KINGSBURG TRUCK CENTER 06/23/2022 5,553.15
81662 3269 LAW & ASSOCIATES 06/23/2022 600.00
81663 4517 LECHOWICZ & TSENG MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 06/23/2022 2,204.44 81664 4711 LEGION CONSTRUCTION 06/23/2022 104.00
81665 3275 LIEBERT, CASSIDY, WHITMORE 06/23/2022 1,857.00 81666 3277 LINCOLN AQUATICS 06/23/2022 4,891.79
81667 4329 MCI COMM SERVICES 06/23/2022 34.57
81668 3518 METRO UNIFORM 06/23/2022 119.69
81669 3997 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL RECYCLING & TRANSFER STATION 06/23/2022 843.15 81670 4709 JOHN MONTES 06/23/2022 10.00
81671 4230 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 06/23/2022 1,890.65 81672 3611 HOLLY OWEN 06/23/2022 140.13
81673 3315 P G & E 06/23/2022 34,826.90
81674 4635 PAYCHEX 06/23/2022 425.00
81675 3334 PROFESSIONAL PRINT & MAIL, INC 06/23/2022 2,476.11 81676 3363 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS 06/23/2022 600.99
81677 3369 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC. 06/23/2022 11,224.73 81678 4262 SILVERFOX ELECTRIC, INC. 06/23/2022 720.00
81679 3397 THE GAS COMPANY 06/23/2022 3,289.18
81680 4167 UPTOWN SPROUTS 06/23/2022 29.00
81681 3493 VILLAGE TIRE SALES 06/23/2022 670.44
81682 3421 VINCENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 06/23/2022 32,416.97 81683 4463 WHITE CAP 06/23/2022 3,759.64
Total for 6/23/2022: 256,690.63
ACH 3231 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP - WIRE 457 07/01/2022 1,283.65 ACH 3470 Internal Revenue Service - ACH 07/01/2022 57,999.91 ACH 3471 Employment Development Department - ACH07/01/2022 10,221.76 ACH 3472 CalPERS - ACH 07/01/2022 45,427.28
ACH 3475 Empower 07/01/2022 3,558.98
ACH 3476 CHILD SUPPORT STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - ACH 07/01/2022 240.46 ACH 3526 Public Employees Retirement System 457 Plan-Deferred Comp - ACH 07/01/2022 327.35 Total for 7/1/2022: 119,059.39
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/12/2022 4:05 PM) Page 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Report Total (146 checks): 955,218.56
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Date (7/12/2022 4:05 PM) Page 4
CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor North & City Council
REPORT FROM: Daniel Perkins, Fire Chief REVIEWED BY: AP AGENDA ITEM: Change of Dispatch Contract Agreement from Fresno County EMS to Fresno County Fire Protection District / Cal-Fire Communications ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ____Resolution √ Motion ______Receive/File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Kingsburg has seen significant growth throughout the past 5 years with the Fire Department on track to see record call volumes for both EMS and FIRE calls for service. This increased demand in call volume places a tremendous strain on the current capabilities of the contracted Dual Communications abilities provided by Fresno County Emergency Medical Services Authority (FCEMSA).
Currently, FCEMSA dispatches both FIRE and EMS calls from the same SINGLE radio channel, “sharing” this channel via simulcast with other local agencies such as American Ambulance South County Units, Selma Fire, Sanger Fire, Orange Cove, and Sequoia Safety Council of Reedley. The volume of EMS calls has increased on this channel so much so that it has made communications difficult when FIRE calls occur and has caused several “near misses” due to improper FIRE radio operations. Adding to this difficulty is the fact that Communications are cited as one of the top 5 factors in Firefighter Fatalities and Severe Injuries according to National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). As such, staff is recommending that Kingsburg FIRE separate the dispatch channels, retaining the current ability to dispatch EMS units for free via FCEMSA and their county-wide exclusive operator (EOA) contract. The current Fire Dispatching portion of the contract would be dissolved and KFD will cease paying $9,000 per year for FCEMSA’s Firerelated Dispatching services. KFD will then replace this Fire Dispatching Contract with a dedicated, Firecentric, regional communications center through the Fresno County Fire Protection District/Cal Fire Communications Center. This regional communications center contract would allow for the following:
• KFD’s immediate use of several emergency FIRE channels, increasing firefighter safety • A committed FIRE Console Operator and the separation of EMS and FIRE Radio Traffic.
The agreement costs will be shared in a “regionalization” of the communications center contract with Selma FIRE simultaneously undergoing the same change thereby decreasing the expenditure for both entities. The cost of the contract per year for each agency is $28,265.10 and is offset for a net impact of $19,265 for KFD. This expenditure was anticipated and is budgeted in the FY23 operating budget.
This change will ensure that growth seen by both communities in the Southern Fresno County area is adequately supported through robust and expandable emergency FIRE communications.
RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
1. Approve the Contract between Fresno County Fire Protection District and city of Kingsburg.
Meeting Date: 07/20/2022
Agenda Item: 5.3
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Council could choose to not support the signing of the contracts; however, this would cause the current unsafe and overcrowded radio operations to remain in place.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC
1. Improve Public Safety
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The cost of the contract is $28, 625.10 per year offset by $9,000 in dissolved communications costs with a net impact of $19,625.10 per year for a total of 5 years with “opt- out” abilities for cause included.
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
N/A
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
These contracts are usual and customary for Emergency service agencies and serve to identify responsibilities and parameters of service as well as length of contracts.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Dispatching agreement from Fresno County Fire Protection District FISCAL IMPACT:
1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes
2. Is it Currently Budgeted? Yes
3. If Budgeted, Which Line? Measure E 106-6200-5710
Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
1 of 8
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND THE CITY OF KINGSBURG
Made for the following services:
□ FIRE PROTECTION
□ MEDICAL SERVICES
□ RESCUE SERVICES
□ FIRE PREVENTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
X EMERGENCY DISPATCH SERVICES
□ FIRE APARATUS REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE
□ HAZMAT RESPONSE SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into and effective this 1st day of August, 2022, by and between The Fresno County Fire Protection District (hereinafter referred to as “DISTRICT”) and the City of Kingsburg (hereinafter referred to as “CITY”), whereby it is agreed as follows:
Article I. SECTION I: PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of the Agreement is to arrange for the DISTRICT, through its Cooperative Fire Protection Programs and current Fire Protection Reimbursement Agreement (“CAL FIRE Agreement”), see, attached Exhibit “A”, with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”) to provide CITY with Emergency Dispatch Services. DISTRICT will dispatch CITY apparatus and personnel to any and all medical responses, motor vehicle accidents, fires, mutual aid calls, and any other lifethreatening emergency that comes through the 911 system within the response area of the CITY (“Scope of Services”), see attached Exhibit “B”.
This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority granted by Government Code Sections 55603, 55603.5, 55606, 55632 and 55642, and will provide Emergency Dispatch Services only. The parties hereto understand and agree that services to be provided under this agreement must be consistent with the terms and conditions of the CAL FIRE Agreement, that no services may be provided by the DISTRICT under this agreement that are not consistent and in conformity with the CAL FIRE Agreement, and that the DISTRICT is under no obligation to provide services under this agreement that are not consistent and in conformity with the CAL FIRE Agreement.
SECTION II: DESIGNATION OF FIRE CHIEF
A. The DISTRICT Fire Chief appointed by the Board of Directors of the DISTRICT, or his designee, (hereinafter referred to as “Chief”) shall represent the DISTRICT during the period of this Agreement and Chief shall, under the supervision and Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
2 of 8
direction of the DISTRICT’S Board of Directors, have charge of providing the Emergency Dispatch Services as provided in the Scope of Services.
B. CITY shall assign an existing Chief Officer or designee as the City contract representative (“City of Kingsburg Representative”). The DISTRICT Fire Chief shall communicate with the City of Kingsburg Representative for directing the Emergency Dispatch Services provided to CITY as set forth in Exhibit “C”.
SECTION III: PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
A. CITY shall pay the DISTRICT actual costs for Emergency Dispatch Services pursuant to this agreement in an amount not to exceed that set forth in Exhibit “C,” as amended annually based on annual call volume as agreed by the DISTRICT and the CITY. The DISTRICT shall make a claim to CITY for the actual cost of contracted services, pursuant to Exhibit “C,” on a bi-annual basis with the first payment due on January 31st, covering the period July 1st thru December 31st. The second payment will be due on July 31st, covering the period January 1st thru June 30th. CITY shall pay the claim within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof.
B. The DISTRICT Fire Chief is authorized to negotiate and execute any amendments to Exhibit “C” of this Agreement on behalf of the DISTRICT without further authority from the DISTRICT’S Board of Directors. The City of Kingsburg Representative is authorized to negotiate and execute any amendments to Exhibit “C” of this Agreement on behalf of the CITY without further authority from the CITY’S City Council.
SECTION IV: INITIAL TERM AND RENEWAL
A. The term of this Agreement shall be from August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025.
This Agreement may be extended by an additional term of twelve (12) months from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 (“Extension Term”), unless either party provides notice of nonrenewal not later than April 1, 2025. If a notice of non-renewal is given unilaterally by the DISTRICT, except any notice issued because of actions of CAL FIRE or CITY, the DISTRICT agrees to continue to provide Emergency Dispatch Services (only) to CITY until such time as CITY has a reasonable opportunity to implement an alternative Emergency Dispatch Service.
B. The Scope of Services and Exhibit C calculations shall apply to the Extension Term unless the parties agree to a modification. CITY shall give the DISTRICT written notice not later than April 1, 2025, of whether CITY intends to change the level of fire protection services from that provided by this agreement. DISTRICT shall give the CITY written notice not later than April 1, 2025, of any proposed changes in rate(s) and an updated Exhibit C for FY 2025-26.
SECTION V: PROPERTY ACCOUNTING
Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
3 of 8
All personal property or fixtures to real property provided by CITY OF KINGSBURG and by the DISTRICT for the purpose of providing Emergency Dispatch Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be marked and accounted for in such a manner as to conform to the standard operating procedure established by the DISTRICT for the segregation, care, and use of the respective property of each.
SECTION VI: INDEMNIFICATION
A. DISTRICT and CITY hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold the other party, its governing board or council, officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys and volunteers harmless from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, damages, losses, expenses, and other liabilities, (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the alleged or actual acts, errors, omissions or negligence of the indemnifying party or its subcontractors relating to the performance of this Agreement to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless the injuries or damages are the result of the non-indemnifying party’s sole negligence or willful misconduct, subject to any limitations imposed by law.
DISTRICT and CITY agree that said indemnity and defense obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any items specified herein that arose or occurred during the term of this Agreement.
B. Prior to commencement of the Emergency Dispatch Services, DISTRICT shall take out and maintain at its own expense insurance coverage in an amount of not less than ONE MILLION dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming the CITY as an additional insured.
DISTRICT shall provide the CITY with a Certificate of Insurance showing proof of such coverage.
SECTION VII: AUDIT
The DISTRICT and CITY agree that their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. The DISTRICT and CITY agree to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated, and to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records.
SECTION VIII: DISPUTES
The CITY of Kingsburg Representative shall, under the supervision and direction of CITY, be available for contract resolution or policy intervention with the DISTRICT, when, upon determination by the DISTRICT Fire Chief that a situation exists under this agreement in which a decision to serve the interest of CITY has the potential to conflict with the DISTRICT interest or policy. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this agreement which is not resolved by the DISTRICT and the CITY Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
4 of 8
representatives within a reasonable period of time (ten days), shall be subject to nonbinding arbitration as set forth below.
Disputes that are unable to be resolved by CITY and the DISTRICT representatives will attempt to be resolved through non-binding arbitration. If non-binding arbitration is unsuccessful, venue for litigation will be the County of Fresno.
SECTION IX: ATTORNEY’S FEES
If CITY fails to remit payments for services rendered pursuant to any provision of this agreement, the DISTRICT may seek recovery of reasonable attorney fees through arbitration and/or litigation, in addition to all other remedies available.
In the event of arbitration or litigation between the DISTRICT and CITY to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any right of either party hereto, the unsuccessful party to such litigation agrees to pay the prevailing party’s costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, all of which shall be included in and as a part of the judgment rendered in such arbitration or litigation.
SECTION X: DELIVERY OF NOTICES
Any notices to be served pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered delivered when deposited in the United States mail and addressed to:
FRESNO COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY OF KINGSBURG
Fire Chief Fire Chief
210 S. Academy Ave. 1401 Draper Street
Sanger, CA 93657 Kingsburg, CA 93631
Provisions of this section do not preclude any notices being delivered in person to the addresses shown above. Delivery in person shall constitute service hereunder, effective when such service is made.
SECTION XI: ENTIRE CONTRACT
This Agreement contains the whole contract between the parties for the provision of Emergency Dispatch Services (only). It may be amended or modified upon the mutual written consent of the parties hereto. This agreement does NOT supplement other specific agreements entered into by both parties for equipment or facilities, and excepting those equipment or facilities agreements, this agreement cancels and supersedes any previous agreement for the same or similar services.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duty authorized officials of the parties hereto have, in their respective capacities, set their hands as of the date first hereinabove written.
Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
5 of 8
Dated: _________________________ CITY OF KINGSBURG
By: ___________________________
Title: Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________ _______________________________
CITY OF KINGSBURG
LEGAL COUNSEL
Title: City Clerk
(SEAL)
Dated: ___________________________ FRESNO COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
By: ___________________________
President, Board of Directors
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________ ______________________________ Clerk of the Board FRESNO COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
LEGAL COUNSEL
(SEAL)
Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
6 of 8
EXHIBIT A
Link to CAL FIRE Agreement: https://www.fresnocountyfire.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/05/Sched-A-Contract-4CA04406-FY19_22-Signed.pdf Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
7 of 8
EXHIBIT B
Eng Res TRK WT* BC UC DC BC FP TG PIO UC DC BC FP TG
4 1 2 1 x x 1 x x
6 1 2 2 x x 1 x x
1 1or2 x
1 2 x x 1
x^ x x x x x
2 1 x
1 1 x x
1 2 1 1 x x x
2 1 1 x x x x x x
1 x
x
1 x x
2 x x x x
3 1 1 1 x x
2 3 2 1 x x
1 2 1 x
1 Bomb Threat/Terrorism 1 x x x x x x x
1st Alarm Notifications
MVA (bus, train)
FMS/PSA
Smoke Check
Haz-mat Incident (MEN, PAR)
Technical Rescue
MVA
2nd Alarm Notifications
EACH Additional Alarm
Vegetation (SRA)
Harvested Ag
Improvement
Farm Equipment
Fire Alarm Residential
Duplicate 1st Alarm
Other
Medical Aid/Industrial Accident
FIRE
Pin-in/Multi-Cas
Veh (pass. Pickup) LRA/SRA
Veh (big rig, bus) LRA/SRA
Aircraft/Train
Unknown Type/Reported Out
Fire Alarm Commercial
Structure
Refuse
Vegetation (LRA)
Structure Target Hazard
Fresno County Fire Protection District Standard Response Plan Incident Type 1st Alarm Response
See CALFIRE SRA Response
Dispatch Agreement
City of Kingsburg
August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026
8 of 8
EXHIBIT C
Exhibit C - Final
City of Kingsburg
FY22/23 Cost Estimate for August 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Fire Protection Services - Dispatch Services Only
CLASSIFICATION NUMBER SALARY MONTHS SUB-TOTAL BENEFITS TOTAL COST
Salaries 63.86%
Communications Operator 1 $4,400.00 7.00 $30,800.00 $19,668.88 50,468.88 Extended Duty Week Compensation 0.00%
Not Applicable
Overtime 1.45%
Overtime 1 $0.00 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00
Uniforms 0.00%
Uniforms (Perm) 0 $104.17 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00
Sub-Total Personnel Services 50,468.88
Contract Administrative Fee CAL FIRE Administrative Rate of 12.01% for Personnel. 12.01% 6,061.31 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 56,530.19
Operating
Utilities 0.00
Fuel 0.00
Vehicle Maintenance 0.00
Miscellaneous Operating Expenses 0.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 0.00
FCFPD Administrative Fee - 10% for Operating Expenses 10.00% 0.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL AND OPERATIONS 56,530.19
Less: 50% Discount expanded auto aid agreement 28,265.10 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR 2022/2023 FISCAL YEAR 28,265.10
CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor North & City Council
REPORT FROM: David Peters, City Engineer REVIEWED BY: AH AGENDA ITEM: Award 2022 Slurry Seal Project
ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ____Motion ____Receive/File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City advertised the 2022 Slurry Seal Project and requested bids on June 24, 2022. On July 12, 2022, the City received two responses from contractors for the project with bids ranging from $175,000.00 to $229,762.00. The lowest bid was submitted by VSS International, Inc. from Sacramento, California in the amount of $175,000.00. VSS International, Inc. possesses an active Class A Contractors license in the State of California and the license is in good standing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
1. Staff recommends the award of the 2022 Slurry Seal Project to VSS International, Inc. in the amount of $175,000.00.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Council could choose to reject all bids.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC
1. VSS International, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
None
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City advertised the 2022 Slurry Seal Project and requested bids on June 24, 2022. The work to be done consists, in general, of surface preparation, type II slurry seal, hot mix asphalt, pavement grinding, pavement striping, markers and markings, and utility adjustment. at the following locations in the City of Kingsburg:
1. Silverbrooke Street – 23rd Avenue to 25th Avenue
2. Lingonberry Street – 25th Avenue to Madsen Avenue
3. Howard Street – 19th Avenue to 25th Avenue
4. Skansen Street – 19th Avenue to end
FISCAL IMPACT:
1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes
2. Is it Currently Budgeted? Yes
3. If Budgeted, Which Line?
Meeting Date: 07/20/2022
Agenda Item: 5.5
5. Skansen Street – 20th Avenue to end
6. Klepper Street – 22nd Avenue to Madsen Avenue
7. 19th Avenue – Howard Street to Klepper Street
8. 21st Avenue – Skansen Street to Klepper Street
9. 22st Avenue – Howard Street to Skansen Street
10. 22nd Avenue – Skansen Street to Sophia Lane
11. 23rd Avenue – Kamm Avenue to Silverbrooke Street
12. 25th Avenue – Silverbrooke Street to Howard Street
On July 12, 2022, the City received two responses from contractors for the project with bids ranging from $175,000.00 to $229,762.00. The lowest bid was submitted by VSS International, Inc. from Sacramento, California in the amount of $175,000.00. VSS International, Inc. possesses an active Class A Contractors license in the State of California and the license is in good standing.
ATTACHED INFORMATION
1. Bid Summary
CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor North & Council Members
REPORT FROM: Holly Owen, AICP, Community Development Director REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM: Commercial Zoning Update - Proposed Scope of Work ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ___Motion _____Receive/File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attached is a summary of the scope of work and specific tasks recommended by the Fresno Council of Governments Circuit Planner program. This is in response to Council’s request at the meeting of June 15th , 2022, for further study and recommendations regarding changes to the zoning ordinance, with particular focus on the downtown corridor uses.
Staff and the consultant will be available to answer questions and to provide a general timeline for the proposed ordinance updates. A PowerPoint presentation will also be reviewed.
RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
1. Staff is recommending the Council approve the proposed scope of services and direct staff to move forward with the consultant on the work plan.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Council may provide input on the scope of services.
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
1. Ensure Financial Stability
2. Increase Retail Opportunities
3. Promote Sustainable Development
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
Council considered an emergency ordinance during the June 15, 2022 regular meeting that would prohibit additional professional offices from leasing on Draper St. from Lincoln St. to California St. While the council did not move forward with the ordinance, they did provide direction to bring the item back for discussion during the July 20, 2022, meeting.
Meeting Date: 07/20/2022
Agenda Item: 6.1
FISCAL IMPACT:
1. Is There a Fiscal Impact? No
2. Is it Currently Budgeted? N/A
3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
See Executive Summary.
ATTACHED INFORMATION
1. Fresno COG Circuit Planner Zoning Ordinance Update
2. PowerPoint Presentation-Fresno COG Circuit Planner Project Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG)
Circuit Planner and Engineer Program
Kingsburg Zoning Update
Project Purpose and Need
The City of Kingsburg has an immediate need for assistance in processing a number of Zone Code Amendments within the Highway-Commercial (CH) district and to limit or prohibit additional professional office uses along Draper Street in the downtown Central Commercial (CC) District. Updating the permitted uses and adding the allowance of residential uses in the CH district will assist the City in providing needed housing resources for the community and meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation in the coming years. Concurrently, by controlling additional professional office uses along Draper Street, the City will curtail the loss of retail and commercial space along this key downtown corridor while creating a more walkable, livable, and economically beneficial downtown area.
Existing Form Based Code Standards Downtown Kingsburg
The City of Kingsburg has implemented Form Based Code (FBC) regulations to revitalize the downtown core of City and to preserve its historic significance and unique character. The existing FBC consists of three distinct transects located within the City’s downtown. Each transect provides distinct development standards and include a variety of uses aimed at supporting mixed-use neighborhoods throughout Kingsburg’s downtown core.
Amendments to FBC3: Draper Street Commercial Corridor
Existing FBC3 standards generally allow for a variety of uses including limited residential, retail, restaurants, public and private offices, personal services and office uses. Amendments to FBC3 would focus on public and private spaces located adjacent to Draper Street approximately between California and Lincoln Streets. Proposed amendments to the existing FBC3 standards include the following:
Revise building form to allow structures up to 3 stories Enable hotel/residential lobbies on the ground floor along Draper St. Revise existing FBC3 to limit office uses on ground floor and continue office uses on 2nd floor along Draper St.
Enable multi-family residential and/or hotel uses on upper floors.
Amendments to FBC2 and FBC3: Simpson Street
Simpson Street provides a direct path leading traffic from Highway-99 and Sierra Street to the Draper Street downtown Corridor. Public and private spaces along Simpson Street can be developed to include additional uses and design features that aid in creating a walkable and vibrant passageway guiding visitors toward Draper Street. Development in public and private spaces along Simpson Street (between Sierra and Draper Streets) are regulated by existing FBC 2 and FBC3 standards. The proposed amendments to FBC2 and FBC3 include:
Amend existing building form standards to allow 4 story development Allow restaurants, outdoor dining, retail, personal services and hotel uses Enhance public spaces and wayfinding by including lighting, pedestrian walkways, public art, benches, and signage
Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG)
Circuit Planner and Engineer Program
Create FBC4 at the Intersection of Sierra and Simpson Street.
The creation of FBC4 will expand FBC code standards and regulations along the corner of Sierra Street and Simpson Street, which is currently not included within existing FBC transects. Due to its proximity to the State Route 99 exit into Kingsburg, the intersection of Sierra and Simpson can serve as a primary guiding point leading visitors through Simpson Street and into the downtown commercial corridor along Draper Street. The existing site, where FBC4 is proposed, is currently zoned Central Commercial (CC) and contains an existing gas station and medical office. FBC4 provides an opportunity to allow a range of diverse uses that create inviting public spaces and increase connectivity throughout Downtown Kingsburg. FBC4 standards will implement the following:
Include building form standards that allow 4 and/or 5 story structures Allow restaurant and retail uses and limit them to the ground floor and allow hotel and/or residential uses on upper floors
Expand the character and historical significance of Kingsburg within the area through use of building form and design standards for public and private spaces Continue implementing directional signage into the proposed FBC4 transect to maintain uniformity with the existing wayfinding elements in surrounding areas Enhance walkability and public space by creating pedestrian pathways, implementing sidewalk furniture, lighting, planters
Highway Commercial District
Currently, the Highway Commercial (CH) district is located along Highway- 99. This district generally permits uses for automobile services, hotels and motels, retail, service stations, restaurants, offices, and other personal service uses. Residential uses are not permitted by right, through Administrative Approval or Commission Approval.
CH Zone Code Amendment
Update section 17.40.040 (Commercial Highway District) by amending the current permitted uses and language. Updates will also include adding residential as a Permitted Use in the CH district which would involve a Zone Code Amendment that adds multi-family residential as a permitted use and require a General Plan Amendment to maintain consistency between the zoning ordinance and the General Plan.
Additionally, property development standards would need to be established for the multi-family dwellings in the CH zone. The CH district of the zoning code can incorporate a section that includes objective design standards for residential developments and can develop a ratio of commercial to residential for a block or other boundary to maximize walkability of the area.
Create a Specific Plan Area
Create a Specific Plan area to specify design standards and other regulations to help guide development in a specified area of the city. Under Gov. Code § 65453, specific plan can be implemented either by adoption by resolution or ordinance. Some jurisdictions have adopted policy portions by resolution and regulatory provisions by ordinance. City of Kingsburg Development Code contains a process for preparing, processing, reviewing, adopting, and amending Specific Plans in Chapter 7.050. A typical specific plan will contain: establishment, relationship to municipal plan, purpose (guide new allowable development consistent with form and character), definitions, prohibitions, etc.
Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG)
Circuit Planner and Engineer Program
Specific design standards can apply to areas and subareas of the specific plan including:
Prohibitions of uses (office space at ground level in mixed-use buildings) Allowable uses (mixed-use residential)
Building standards
Building height
Public realm design guidelines
Buffering walls and screening for noise mitigation
Landscaping (drought tolerant)
Parking
Sign standards
Preservation of cultural resources
Lighting
Update Mixed-Use Overlay Zoning District
A mixed-use overlay is a regulatory tool to facilitate the development of commercial and residential uses in certain areas of a city. While some overlay zones such as historic preservation or coastal conservation impose additional regulations that can limit development, a mixed-use overlay gives developers the option to build housing units while leaving the underlying zoning intact. The overlay provides the option for the development of residential and or a mix of both commercial and residential with commercial up front on the ground floor. To implement residential uses in the CH district the city can update section
17.48.020- MXU- Mixed Use Combining District to include opportunity sites along Highway-99 in the CH district. Objective design standards will be added under to section 17.48.020- MXU to create design standards. Proposed property developments within the CH Mixed use overlay district will have to follow the mixed overlay standards and the Highway Beautification Overlay District standards.
Objective Design Standards
Objective design standards are standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards can improve the overall site and building design throughout the city by guiding the form and character of developments.
Examples of a few standards
Setbacks
Residential building 100 feet from Highway
15 ft front yard
Building Mass
Special care should be taken to break down a building's mass wherever possible through variation in height. Varied floor plans can be designed in such a way so that less long runs of side wall can be paired with plans that have longer runs. Floor Area Ratio
Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG)
Circuit Planner and Engineer Program
Currently no FAR standards are established but we can incorporate an FAR of 1.5 which is close to what City of Fresno uses for their mixed-use zones. Common open space
The minimum area of any common open space shall be 1,000 square feet. The calculation of the common open space area shall exclude structures which are unusable as open space, but shall include structures that enhance its usability, such as swimming pools, changing facilities, fountains, planters, benches, and landscaping Reduce Pollution Risks near Highways
Allowing residential near heavy trafficked highways poses many health risks to residents due to pollution concentrations and emission rates of cars and trucks. CalEnviroScreen shows that the City of Kingsburg has a pollution burden of 94 and a CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile of 70. Kingsburg also has an asthma percentile of 77 meaning that the asthma rate is higher than 77% of the census tracts in California. The traffic impacts for the portion of Kingsburg South of Highway 99 has a traffic density percentile of 39 and a diesel particulate matter percentile of 83. The area north of highway 99 has a traffic percentile of 24 and a diesel particulate percentile of 48.
Cities can implement regulations to reduce some of the risks for those living near highways. The City can require developments to provide solid barriers with vegetation such as sound walls and trees along freeways to help reduce noise and pollutants from freeway. The city can also require residential developments to have high efficiency filtration system and devices specifically high-efficiency filtration with mechanical ventilation or portable high efficiency air cleaners. Development standards can also require open space areas to be as far from the freeway sources as possible and can prioritize the location of non-habitable uses such as parking structures nearest the freeway.
Incentive Programs
A development incentive program encourages a developer to voluntarily provide a community benefit in exchange for building incentives. Since development incentive programs are voluntary it cannot include required development exactions, in-lieu and impact fees, or off-site improvements. For an incentive program to be effective it is important for it to be structured in a way to make it attractive for developers to voluntarily provide good quality public amenities. It must be clear, simple, and predictable.
Developers can provide
Public Open Space
Public right-of-way improvements
Public Parking
Neighborhood centers
Water efficiency and Alternative energy
Public art
Eco roofs
Development incentives can include:
Height increases
Density increase
Floor Area Ratio bonuses
Relaxation of parking requirements
Fee waiver
Expedited City Approvals
Zoning Ordinance Update
City Council Meeting| July 20, 2022
City of Kingsburg
Kingsburg Form Based Code and Zoning Update Team
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 2
Holly Owen
• Community
Development
Director
• City of
Kingsburg
Alexander
Henderson
• City Manager
• City of
Kingsburg
Eric VonBerg
• Project
Manager
• Rincon
Consultants
Jerry
Hittleman
• Zoning Lead
• Rincon
Consultants
Agenda
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 3
What improvements can be
made to Draper Street’s Form
Based Code?
How to incorporate housing
into the Commercial Highway
zone?
What input do you have now, as
we get started?
Existing Form Based Code Downtown Kingsburg
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 4
Draper Street Form Based Code (FBC) Updates
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 5
Amend existing FBC standards to:
Permit retail, restaurants and personal services and limit office uses on the ground floor of structures along
Draper St.
Encourage development of up to 3 stories and allow
multi-family residential, hotel and office uses upper
floors of buildings along Draper St.
Increase existing height standards within FBC 2 to allow hotel uses up to 5 stories, and within FBC3, allow hotel and/ or residential uses up to 3 stories.
Form Based Code (FBC) updates Cont’d
Zoning Ordinance Update 6
Amend existing FBC & Zoning Ordinance standards to:
Establish new FBC4 Transect at corner of Sierra St and Simpson St to allow restaurant and retail uses on ground floor and hotel and/or residential uses on upper floors. Enhance wayfinding and public spaces near Hwy-99 exit & Sierra St. to Draper Street commercial corridor.
Revise existing FBC2 and FBC3 standards to allow
restaurants, outdoor dining and retail uses and enhance wayfinding along Simpson St. (between Sierra St. and
Draper St.).
Include design standards to incorporate lighting, signage and other features to vehicles and pedestrians into the downtown corridor on Draper St.
7/20/2022
Commercial Highway (CH) Zone
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 7
Existing Kingsburg Standards
CH Highway Commercial Zone
Building Placement Requirements: Front/Rear/Side setbacks Building Form Requirements: height 50’ max
Parking Requirements: Varies per use
Allowable uses include
Industrial
Retail
Recreation, education, and public assembly
Services
Transportation, communication, infrastructure
Commercial Highway Zone- Option 1
Add Residential as a permitted use
Zone Code Amendment and General Plan
Amendment
Establish Development Standards for multifamily dwellings in CH zone Develop a ratio of commercial to residential for a
block or other boundary to maximize walkability
of the block
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 8
Commercial Highway Zone- Option 2
Create a Specific Plan to specify design
standards and other regulations to help
guide development
Specific Design Standards can apply to
areas and subareas of the specific plan
including:
Prohibition of uses (office space at ground level
in mixed use buildings)
Building standards
Height
Public realm design guidelines
Parking
Sign standards
Lighting
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 9
Alvarado Specific Plan Draft Site Development Plan (La Mesa, CA) Commercial Highway Zone- Option 3
Create a mixed-use overlay zoning
district for opportunity sites along
Highway 99
Provide options for residential or mix
of both commercial (Vertical and/or
Horizontal Mixed-use)
Establish Objective Development
Standards for multi-family dwellings
in CH zone
Develop a ratio of commercial to
residential for a block or other
boundary to maximize walkability of
the block
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 10
Objective Design Standards
Objective Design Standards are
standards that involve no personal
or subjective judgement by a public
official
Improve overall site and building
design throughout the city
Guide building form and character
Encourage development that
facilitates a sense of community
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 11
Objective Design Standards continued…
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 12
Examples of objective design standards include:
Setbacks (front, rear, side), building height, minimum parking spaces, private and common open space,
distance between structures, lot coverage, etc.
Density/Intensity:
Commercial: Floor area ratio (FAR)
Residential: Dwelling units per area (Du/Ac)
Open Space- standards for common and private
open space
Reduce Pollution Risks near Highways
Require solid barriers and vegetation
along freeways
Reduce noise and disperse pollutants
Indoor high efficiency filtration system
Locate open space areas far from
freeway sources
Prioritize non-habitable uses nearest
freeways
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 13
Incentive Programs
Encourage developers to voluntarily provide a
community benefit in exchange for building
incentives
Developers provide: Public open space, Larger
units, sustainable designs, public parking,
public art, public right of way improvements
Development incentives can include: height
increases, density increase, FAR bonuses, fee
waivers, expedited city approvals
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 14
Wayfinding
Improve Existing Signage
Directional Signage
Downtown Entry Sign
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 15
Tell us…
What types of housing is needed
in the City?
What types of businesses and
entertainment would you like to
see in Kingsburg?
What types of uses would fit in
what parts of the city? Or what
uses do not fit in certain parts?
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 16
Thank You!
Holly Owen, City of Kingsburg
[email protected]
Eric VonBerg, Rincon Consultants
[email protected]
7/20/2022 Zoning Ordinance Update 17
CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Laura North & City Council
REPORT FROM: Daniel A. Galvez -Public Works Director REVIEWED BY: AP AGENDA ITEM: Turf Replacement Program Update
ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ____Motion _____Receive/File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City is continuing the Turf replacement program in the new fiscal year, 22/23. The City has budgeted $30,000 and is funded by the Water Enterprise fund. The program has received a great amount of interest and has been promoted in the Carrier and City Website. The turf replacement program assists with converting grass landscapes with drought tolerant landscape or artificial turf. The rebate program allows for a maximum of $3,000 per project for materials and labor. The program provides $2 per Sq Ft of turf replaced (1500 sq-ft maximum). The goal of the program is to reduce water usage among its residential and commercial customers.
Staff has worked to make this program as easy as possible. • Residents submit an application for the program and the application is reviewed by City staff. • If the project is eligible, a site visit is scheduled and notice to proceed is given with an estimated rebate amount.
• The applicant will have 60 days to complete the project. • When the project is complete, a follow up verification meeting is scheduled. The project is confirmed, and cost documentation is submitted by the applicant and rebate amount is confirmed. • A reimbursement request is submitted, and check is issued.
In total the City has received 29 applications. For fiscal year 21/22 which ended June 30, 2022, 11 projects were completed. 10,796 sq ft. of turf was removed and 125 of sprinkler heads were removed or converted to drip irrigation. We currently have 9 projects in progress and 7 waiting to be processed.
The initial cycle has been a learning experience for staff and in the new fiscal year staff hopes to improve the program by sharing some of the lessons learned. In 2021 and 2022 the cost of materials has increased including the cost for artificial turf and base materials, knowing that the rebate may not cover the full cost of the replacement and having various quotes will lead a successful project. Removing turf is also labor intensive and disposing of the removed grass is also a challenge that needs to be pre-planned. Staff recommends for the DIY’er to utilize a sod remover to facilitate the work. As staff has inspected projects, we also found that requiring 4 plants for every 100 sq ft of sod removed did not work for every project and some applicants had already converted their flower beds with drought tolerant plants and drip irrigation. Some projects are looking to remove turf. The City has modified the program guidelines to allow for 2 plants for every 100 sq ft of turf removed and for project that just want to have turf replaced provided drip irrigation is/ or will be installed or capped.
Our goal for next cycle is improve the pre-inspection process and encourage commercial properties to apply.
Meeting Date: 7/20/2022
Agenda Item: 6.2
RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
1. No action information item only
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. No alternatives -information item only
STRATEGIC GOAL(S) MET:
1. Promote Sustainable Development
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
Council previously approved $30, 000 from the water enterprise for the fiscal year 2021/2022. The program was renewed for the fiscal year 2022/2023 for the same amount. The City has previously participated in irrigation and reduced water use programs. The City previously provided smart irrigation controllers to its residents. This program allowed for residents to automatically program an irrigation schedule to coincide with the City’s current watering schedule.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The EPA estimates that the average American family uses 320 gallons of water per day, about 30 percent of which is devoted to outdoor uses. Eliminating lawns can provide significant water savings a typical pop-up station of a lawn irrigation system uses approximately 16 gallons of water per minute. Here is an example of how to calculate how much water is being used per month:
Number of Minutes x Number of Stations/Zones = Total Minutes Total Minutes x Gallons per minute = Total Gallons used per watering cycle Total Gallons per cycle x Number of days per month you water = Total gallons used per month If your system has eight stations, and you water twice per week, and each station runs for 15 minutes, then you are using 1,920 gallons each day you water, or 15,360 gallons per month.
Our current watering schedule has two cycles:
Outdoor watering is allowed three (3) days per week from April - October.
Odd numbered addresses can water on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.
Even numbered addresses can water on Wednesday, Friday and Sunday.
No watering on Monday.
Outdoor watering is allowed two (2) days per week from November - March.
Odd numbered addresses can water on Tuesday and Saturday only.
Even numbered addresses can water on Wednesday and Sunday only.
No watering on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
The State of California recently issued an emergency mandate that bans the use of potable (drinkable) water on decorative or non-functional grass at commercial, industrial, and institutional properties. The regulations also apply to common areas of subdivisions and properties controlled by homeowner association. The regulations do not apply to recreational or residential areas or trees.
FISCAL IMPACT:
1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes
2. Is it Currently Budgeted? Yes
3. If Budgeted, Which Line? Water Enterprise
In June 2021, our water wells produced 114. 682(Million Gallons) MG compared to 132.702 MG in 2021, and 111.67 MG in 2020. The amounts produced in recent years is significantly less than in June 2013 when 162.8 MG of water were produced. Water production is trending upwards from 2019 when drought was fresh and maximum enforcement was in place.
In the month of June, staff issued 12- $25 water violations to residents who were watering on the incorrect day, time or had watering flowing beyond their property line.
The State of California is in a drought with most counties categorized in one of the following categories: D2- Severe Drought, D3 Extreme Drought, and D4 Exceptional Drought. Fresno County is currently categorized as D4 exceptional drought. The City of Kingsburg has seen water levels drop across all well sites, but the water system has not shown any signs of not being able to meet the water demands of the City. Conservation is key to continue to have a healthy water system.
ATTACHED INFORMATION
1. Turf Program guidelines
2. Turf Program application
3. Turf Replacement Presentation- Power Point
Turf Replacement
Rebate Program Guidelines
Offer available thru June 30, 2023, and subject to funding availability Outdoor landscaping is the single largest use of water in a typical California home. In most yards, grass consumes the most water, therefore reducing or eliminating how much grass you have can significantly reduce your water use.
How to Apply:
1. Obtain an application using one of the following methods:
a. Telephone: (559) 897-1066
b. Website: http://ca-kingsburg.civicplus.com/213/Water c. Email: [email protected]
2. Send the completed application, photos of the current landscape, list of proposed plants and a sketch of proposed conversion to one of the following:
a. Mail:
City of Kingsburg
Attention: Water Division – Rebate Program
1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631
b. Email: [email protected]
3. A City of Kingsburg representative will contact you to schedule a brief appointment to verify your existing landscape.
*Do not begin your conversion until the rebate has been approved after the pre-inspection.
City of Kingsburg
1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631-1908
(559) 897-5821 Fax: (559) 897-5568
City of Kingsburg water customers may be eligible for a rebate when they convert their existing grass area with any qualifying artificial turf products or drought tolerant landscape products. The rebate amount may not exceed $3,000 per residential or commercial City of Kingsburg water account. Funding is limited and applications will be accepted on a first come, first served basis. The City reserves the right to terminate this program at any time and for any reason. 2 Program Guidelines & FAQs
Who Qualifies?
Residential and Commercial City of Kingsburg customers who pay a water utility bill to the City of Kingsburg.
Customer accounts that are in good standing.
Tenants who provide written approval from the property owner or property manager. Area to be converted must have grass or traditional sprinklers intact at the Pre-Inspection appointment in order to qualify for the rebate.
New homes with existing drought tolerant landscape or unfinished yards are not eligible. Project must be a minimum of 250 sq-FT and maximum of 1500 sq-FT.
Timelines
Program applies to turf replaced between 7/1/2022 thru 6/30/2023. A pre-inspection will be scheduled once the application has been received. After approval of pre-inspection, you will have 60 days to complete the conversion of your existing landscaping, which will be indicated in the Notice to Proceed Letter. Once completed, contact the City of Kingsburg at 559-897-1066 or by email at [email protected] to schedule the post-inspection. Itemized dated sales receipts for the products used in the conversion are required at the post-inspection.
If not approved at inspection, you have 30 days to make corrections and to schedule a final inspection.
Project must be completed by 6/30/2023.
Turf Replacement
Turf replacement must be drought tolerant and permeable (allow water to penetrate into the ground) and must include California friendly and drought tolerant plants- 2 minimum per 100 sq FT .
Applicant must provide a simple sketch of the proposed landscape, as well as photos of the existing landscape.
When replacing turf, irrigation system must be capped, eliminated or converted to drip. Turf replacement must be maintained and kept in healthy condition for a minimum of 5 years.
Turf replacement must be installed within the City of Kingsburg service area and at the address listed on the application.
Applicants must provide a list of proposed plants with the application. If only part of the lawn is converted, the new planting area must be on a separate valve.
Turf replacements that include only mulch, gravel, rocks or just artificial turf are not eligible without prior approval.
3 Rebates
Existing artificial turf, new construction, accessories, and taxes do not qualify.
Reimbursement is for products used in the conversion. Labor cost will be capped at 50% of the total drought material cost.
Rebate checks will be mailed within 8 weeks after completing the rebate process.
Rebate amount cannot exceed the cost of the products used in the conversion. Dated, itemized sales receipts are required at the post-inspection.
Rebates are limited to $3,000 per eligible utility billing account per fiscal year (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023). $2 per Sq Ft- turf replacement 1,500 sq ft max.
Application and Rebate Approval or Denial
On-site compliance verification is required.
Original itemized, dated sales receipt for the products used in the conversion area is required at the post-inspection
Incomplete, incorrect, or unsigned applications cannot be processed. We will contact you with any discrepancies and may require you to submit a new application.
Customer must fulfill all program guidelines to be eligible for rebates.
Other Considerations
The Rebate Program is not responsible for materials lost by mail.
The City is not liable, responsible nor will warrant any work done with any reimbursed funds.
Submission or possession of a rebate application does not guarantee receiving a rebate.
Rebates are processed on a first come, first served basis.
Photos of the project site may be used for printed or digital promotional material.
Funding for this rebate program is limited to available resources.
Rebate amounts are subject to change without notification.
This program shall at all times be subject to change or termination without prior notice.
For Official Use Only:
Final Inspection Date: ________ Tracking #:________________ Inspector: _________ Approved: __ Denied: __ Reason for denial: __________________ Approved By: _____________________________ Rebate Check sent: Date: ______________ By: ____________ Total Rebate Amount: $_______
Turf Replacement Rebate Program Application
thru June 30, 2023, and subject to fund availability
$2.00per Sq Ft- Turf Replacement
(1,500 Sq Ft max Residential & Commercial)
Account Information
Applicant Name: ________________________________ Phone: _____________________ Service Address: _________________________________ Email: ____________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________
Water Account Number: __________________________________ Type of Property Circle One : Residential Commercial
Inspection Required: Do Not Begin Project Until After Pre-Inspection Approval Rebate Information:
• Note to tenants: approval from property owner/property manager must be included. • The rebate value cannot exceed the actual cost of the products used in the conversion. • An original itemized dated sales receipt is required at the post-inspection. • Limit of $3,000 rebate per eligible account per fiscal year (July 1, 2022-June 30, 2023) • Compliance with Turf replacement guidelines is required.
Agreement of Terms and Conditions:
The City of Kingsburg may deny any application that does not meet program requirements. The undersigned expressly agrees that the City may inspect all items submitted for the Turf Replacement Rebate Program. Applicant confirms and agrees they have read, understand and will adhere to the Turf replacement guideline. The City does not guarantee the performance of any turf replacement; does not warrant any turf replacement or installation to be free of defects, the quality of the workmanship, or the suitability of the premises or the turf replacement installation.
The undersigned further agrees to hold harmless the City of Kingsburg against all loss, damage, expense and liability resulting from the loss, destruction or damage to property arising out of or in any way connected with the turf replacement. The City reserves the right to alter this program at any time. Funding for this rebate program is limited to available resources. Rebates are processed on a first come, first served basis. In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) of 1990, the Fair Employment & Housing Act (“FEHA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (as amended), Government Code section 11135 and other applicable codes, the City of Kingsburg (“City”) will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of disability in the City’s services, programs, or activities. For more information, please visit the City of Kingsburg website at https://www.cityofkingsburg-ca.gov/404/ADA-and-Section-504 I have read, understand, and agree to the terms and conditions of this rebate program Signature of Applicant: ____________________________________________ Date: ______________________ City of Kingsburg
1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631-1908
(559) 897-5821 Fax: (559) 897-5568
Kingsburg Turf
Replacement
Program
Turf Replacement Program
• First Approved in September 2021 for FY
21/22
• Approved for FY 22/23
• $30,000 allocated for each fiscal year
• $2 for every sq ft. of turf removed
• Maximum rebate amount $3000
• Must have drought tolerant landscape
• Irrigation – spray Heads must be capped or
converted to drip
2 Turf Rebate Process
3 Step 1
Application
Submitted/
Reviewed
Step 2
Site Visit/Notice
to Proceed
Step 3
60 days to
complete work
Step 4
Verification
Meeting
Step 5
Reimbursement
Turf Replacement : By the Numbers
• 29 applications received as of
7/11/22
• 11 projects completed - FY 21/22
• $21,591 rebates issued
• 10796 sq ft. of turf removed
• 125 sprinklers capped or converted
to drip
• 9 applications currently in progress
• 7 applications waiting to be
processed
4 7/15/2022
Program Challenges
• Review and pre -inspection
• Design
• Materials Cost & Estimates
• Sod Removal
• Plant requirements 4 for
every 100 sq ft
• Sod Removal Only
5 Program Adjustments
• Additional Staff
• Design – more examples
• Material Cost
• Estimates- Quotes
• Sod Removal –Labor
• Plant requirements 2 for every 100 sq ft*
• Sod Removal Only - Flexibility
6 Turf Rebate Program
Goals FY 22/23
• Improve – Review and Pre-inspection timing
• Fully Utilize Budgeted Funds
• Encourage Commercial Applicants
• Questions?
7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor North & City Council
REPORT FROM: Michael Noland, City Attorney REVIEWED BY: AH AGENDA ITEM: National Opioid Settlement
ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ____Motion ____Receive/File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During the December 1, 2021 City Council meeting, City staff advised the City Council the City had registered to participate in the National Opioid Settlement.
In July, 2021, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced $26 billion in opioid litigation settlements. The settlements include settlements with Cardinal, McKesson, and AmerisourceBergen – the nation’s three major pharmaceutical distributors and Janssen, a company that manufactured and marketed opioids which is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. As part of the proposed settlements, it was anticipated California would receive a maximum of approximately $2.26 billion (“Settlement Funds”). Eligible cities and counties that elected to participate in the settlement will receive a portion of the Settlement funds, and the more eligible cities and counties that join, the larger the Settlement Funds will be to the State of California.
The litigating California entities (about 78 cities and counties) finalized an allocation agreement with the Attorney General. The County of Fresno has been involved in these negotiations on behalf of the County and the cities in Fresno County. As a result of the Attorney General’s final approval the final allocation agreement approximately $2.1 to $2.5 billion will be received by the State of California over the next 18 years (the Johnson and Johnson money is paid over 8 years). The Year 1 Payment Allocations for the State of California, the County of Fresno and the City of Kingsburg are attached to this Staff Report as Exhibit “A”. As you will note, the Year 1 Payment Allocation to the City of Kingsburg is $4,422.77 and the Year 1 Payment Allocation to the County of Fresno is $1,042,955.13. If the allocation remains the same for the 18-year period, the City could receive a total of approximately $79,609.86.
The funds received by each jurisdiction may only be spent on an approved list of opioid abatement purposes.
Every participating jurisdiction that elects to receive direct settlement payments must comply with annual reporting requirements to the National Settlement Administrator and to possible audits by the State of California.
The County of Fresno is suggesting that rather than a city in Fresno County receiving a direct payment of settlement funds, each city allow its share of the settlement funds to flow to the County of Fresno. It is our understanding, the County of Fresno plans to use the settlement funds for a County-wide program dealing with opioid treatment and abatement. City Staff is requesting direction from the City Council regarding the following: (i) receive the settlement amounts and initiate a City-wide opioid abatement program funded by the annual settlement payments received by the City; or (ii) allow the City’s share of settlement funds to flow to the County of Fresno to assist with funding County-wide programs for opioid treatment and abatement.
Meeting Date: 07/20/2022
Agenda Item: 6.3
RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
1. Assign the City’s share of settlement funds to the County of Fresno to assist with funding County-wide programs for opioid treatment and abatement.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Receive the settlement funds and develop a City-wide opioid treatment and abatement program.
STRATEGIC GOAL(S) MET:
1. Improve Public Safety
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FISCAL IMPACT:
1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes
2. Is it Currently Budgeted? No
3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A
MEASURE C • SHARING YOUR TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
City of Fresno
Measure C Renewal - MC3
Proposed Alternative | July 7, 2022
Introduction of City of Fresno Alternative
Benefits to Other Cities
City of Fresno Alternative
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Clovis $20.9 million (+4.1%)
Coalinga $7.4 million (+10.6%)
Firebaugh $4.3 million (+12.6%)
Fowler $1.5 million (+4.3%)
Fresno $86.9 million (+3.8%)
Huron $4.5 million (+18.4%)
Kerman $7.6 million (+12.3%)
Kingsburg $4.7 million (+9.0%)
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Mendota $6.7 million (+13.9%)
Orange Cove $5.4 million (+14.3%)
Parlier $6.7 million (+11.5%)
Reedley $7.9 million (+7.6%)
San Joaquin $2.9 million (+17.2%)
Sanger $10.3 million (+9.9%)
Selma $8.4 million (+8.4%)
Fresno County: Decreased Revenues
$185 million (-15.5%)
Overall Positive Components of COG Plan
• Emphasis on neighborhoods and street
repair (51% of total program)
• No Neighborhood Left Behind – 30%
minimum requirement for Disadvantaged
Neighborhoods
• Reduction in Regional Program from 30% to
15% in the proposed MC3 Renewal Plan
City of Fresno Alternative
• All funding allocations by
program to remain the
same
• Recommending
adjustments to policies
and calculations/formulas
Comparison
Measure C Programs
Program Current Measure C
(2007-27)
FCTA/COG
Presentation MC3
City of Fresno Alternative
MC3
Local & Neighborhood Streets 15.3% 51% 51%
Flexible/Local Control 14.8% 18% 18%
Public Transit 19.66% 12% 12%
Senior/ADA Taxi Scrip/Van Pools 1.95% Absorbed in Transit New Tech, PTIS 2.39%
Regional Program 30.4% 15% 15%
ADA 0.5%
Pedestrian/Bicycle 4% 1% 1%
Environmental Enhancement 3.5% 2% 2%
Rail Consolidation 6%
Administration 1.5% 1% 1%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
COG Recommended Plan
Overall Shortcomings
• Urban Tier 1 project list – should focus more on existing needs rather than capacity for new growth areas
• Clarity needed for Local Hire, Urban TOD requirements • Flawed assumption that Measure C revenue growth would outpace inflation and enable a 39% smaller share for the Public Transit program without service impacts starting in July 2027.
Shortcomings of the COG Recommended Plan
(Local & Neighborhood Streets)
• Elimination of the $100,000 baseline allocation to every agency prior to distributing funds by formula, which has served to provide greater equity to smaller cities in the current 2007-27 program • Inability for agencies to repair curbs and sidewalks, or to perform Complete Streets projects
Solutions | City of Fresno Alternative
(Local & Neighborhood Streets)
• Restore equity, provide
flexibility
• Provide a baseline $100,000 to each
agency prior to distributing the
balance by population-road miles
(same as current Measure)
• Modify formula to be 80%
population, 20% road miles
• Allow agencies to repair curbs,
gutters & sidewalks; and/or provide
Complete Streets when roadways
are repaved
Shortcomings of the COG Recommended Plan
(Local Control)
• COG PLAN
• Insufficient Local Control funding levels for cities
• CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSAL:
• Local Control / Flexible Funding – to address public transit program reductions and local agency needs, the Local Control / Flexible funding needs to be 100% population-based.
Benefits to Other Cities
City of Fresno Alternative
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Clovis $20.9 million (+4.1%)
Coalinga $7.4 million (+10.6%)
Firebaugh $4.3 million (+12.6%)
Fowler $1.5 million (+4.3%)
Fresno $86.9 million (+3.8%)
Huron $4.5 million (+18.4%)
Kerman $7.6 million (+12.3%)
Kingsburg $4.7 million (+9.0%)
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Mendota $6.7 million (+13.9%)
Orange Cove $5.4 million (+14.3%)
Parlier $6.7 million (+11.5%)
Reedley $7.9 million (+7.6%)
San Joaquin $2.9 million (+17.2%)
Sanger $10.3 million (+9.9%)
Selma $8.4 million (+8.4%)
Fresno County: Decreased Revenues
$185 million (-15.5%)
Shortcomings of the COG Recommended Plan
(Transit)
• 39% cut in Regional Public Transit
funding per year, as compared to the
2007-27 Measure C Expenditure Plan
(12% share v. 19.66% share)
• Elimination of category for
Senior/ADA Taxi Script/Van Pools
assuming that services will be
absorbed by urban cities while
reducing allocation in transit share
Brief Overview
FAX Transit Service
• 10.5 million passenger trips (pre-COVID)
• BRT – 25% of total ridership, $56.3 million project
with $16.8 million in local funding
• High frequency route ridership at 21% of total
• 18 total routes
• Promotes infill, transit-oriented development,
affordable housing, economic development in
older neighborhoods
• 70% of passengers indicate no access to a car or
other vehicle and depend on public transit
Adjustments to Regional Tier 1 Urban Program
City of Fresno Alternative
Reductions (move to Tier 2) New Additions to Tier 1
Grantland Avenue (#54/55)
Move full amount to Tier 2
($25M) East/West Corridors west of 99
(Shaw, Ashlan, Clinton, McKinley)
$40M
Temperance Ave (#76)
Preserve $10.8M for
Temperance Avenue in Tier 1)
($20M) Blackstone BRT Corridor
Smart Mobility Improvements
$5M
Reductions in Tier 1 ($45M) Additions in Tier 1 $45M
Net Change (Fresno) (0)
• No changes to program funding levels
• No changes to Rural or Clovis projects
• Proposed changes affect City of Fresno jurisdiction only Environmental Sustainability / TOD
City of Fresno Alternative
• Environmental Sustainability – incorporate guidelines for projects to ensure true Transit Oriented Development:
• Be located in an urban area on a site that has either been previously developed or that adjoins existing major urban uses on at least seventy-five percent of the site’s perimeter.
• Be located within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor.
• Density of at last 20 units per acre, and a commercial infill mixed-use project should have a floor area ratio of at least 0.75.
• “High-quality transit corridor” means an existing corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.
Local Hire Provisions
City of Fresno Alternative
• Local Hire – The Expenditure Plan should provide for the ability to establish local hiring goals for Contractors on Measure C projects.
City of Fresno Summary
Summary of Benefits
City of Fresno Alternative
• No changes to the program funding levels as presented by staff • No impacts to Urban or Rural regional programs
• Restores equity for smaller cities, consistent with the current Measure C Expenditure Plan (2007-27)
• Provides flexibility to local agencies to utilize street repair funds for curbs, gutters and sidewalks if needed
• Provides resources to address pavement conditions
• Increased funding levels for every city
• County road repair funding of $1.01 billion over 30 years, a 79% greater share of the total program over the current Measure C • Protects transit, avoids severe cutbacks in service
Comparison
Measure C Programs
Program FCTA/COG
Presentation MC3
City of Fresno Alternative
MC3
Local & Neighborhood Streets 51% 51%
Flexible/Local Control 18% 18%
Public Transit 12% 12%
Senior/ADA Taxi Scrip/Van Pools Absorbed in Transit
New Tech, PTIS
Regional Program 15% 15%
ADA
Pedestrian/Bicycle 1% 1%
Environmental Enhancement 2% 2%
Rail Consolidation
Administration 1% 1%
TOTAL 100% 100%
Benefits to Other Cities
City of Fresno Alternative
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Clovis $20.9 million (+4.1%)
Coalinga $7.4 million (+10.6%)
Firebaugh $4.3 million (+12.6%)
Fowler $1.5 million (+4.3%)
Fresno $86.9 million (+3.8%)
Huron $4.5 million (+18.4%)
Kerman $7.6 million (+12.3%)
Kingsburg $4.7 million (+9.0%)
Agency Increased Revenues over
30 Years for Street Repairs,
Flexible Funds (Local
Control)
Mendota $6.7 million (+13.9%)
Orange Cove $5.4 million (+14.3%)
Parlier $6.7 million (+11.5%)
Reedley $7.9 million (+7.6%)
San Joaquin $2.9 million (+17.2%)
Sanger $10.3 million (+9.9%)
Selma $8.4 million (+8.4%)
Fresno County: Decreased Revenues
$185 million (-15.5%)
MEASURE C • SHARING YOUR TRANSPORTATION NEEDS Measure C 3 Local Flow Thru
TWG/EC
Committee Recommendation Fresno Proposal Difference
Agency
Clovis 496,660,395 10.36% 519,210,059 10.83% $22,549,664 Coalinga 69,196,730 1.44% 74,562,264 1.55% $5,365,534
Firebaugh 32,379,516 0.68% 36,943,730 0.77% $4,564,214
Fowler 29,414,298 0.61% 32,599,858 0.68% $3,185,560
Fresno 2,210,712,853 46.10% 2,307,800,260 48.13% $97,087,407 Huron 28,275,367 0.59% 33,128,585 0.69% $4,853,218
Kerman 65,270,367 1.36% 71,008,461 1.48% $5,738,094
Kingsburg 58,709,643 1.22% 61,935,554 1.29% $3,225,911
Mendota 47,821,219 1.00% 53,838,196 1.12% $6,016,977
Orange Cove 39,791,905 0.83% 44,073,084 0.92% $4,281,179 Parlier 60,804,739 1.27% 67,641,387 1.41% $6,836,648
Reedley 107,393,155 2.24% 114,213,410 2.38% $6,820,255
San Joaquin 16,972,795 0.35% 20,611,555 0.43% $3,638,760 Sanger 113,431,849 2.37% 120,149,116 2.51% $6,717,267
Selma 100,787,707 2.10% 107,380,167 2.24% $6,592,460
County of Fresno 1,317,696,922 27.48% 1,130,223,774 23.57% ($187,473,148) TOTAL 4,795,319,460 100.00% 4,795,319,460 100.00% $0
Fiscal Impact of Fresno City Alternative