Agenda — Kingsburg City Council, October 7, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA

KINGSBURG CITY COUNCIL REGULAR

MEETING
WEDNESDAY, October 7, 2026 at 6:00pm
Meeting held in the Council Chamber, 1401 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA 93631 (559)897-5821
www.cityofkingsburg-ca.gov
Staci Smith, Mayor
Brandon Pursell, Mayor Pro Tem Vince Palomar, Council Member Laura North, Council Member David M. Silva, Council Member The Council Chamber is accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 559-897-6520.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

This meeting will be open to the public for in-person and remote participation. Members of the public may attend the City Council Meeting in person at the address listed above, or join the City Council Meeting via teleconference using Zoom by visiting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82909008392?pwd=A7yrYAaf8mZoL29ATSsbEkQhMfMvZ0.1 and entering Meeting ID: 829 0900 8392 and Passcode: 926600 or dialing +1-646-568-7788, entering 829 0900 8392# when prompted, entering # (pound) when prompted, and entering 926600# when prompted.

If you wish to make a public comment:
• Comments via Email – Submit written comments via email to apalsgaard@cityofkingsburgca.gov, using “public comment” as the subject line. Your comment will be provided to the City Council and appropriate staff member(s) and will become a permanent part of the official meeting record. Please submit your comments as far in advance as possible. Emailed comments must be received before 12:00 p.m. (i.e., 11:59 a.m. or earlier) on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, in order to be included in the record.

Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting. • In-Person Comments – When asked by the Mayor, raise your hand that you would like to speak. • Comments via Zoom – Visit:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89686061553?pwd=CRPb8Tn5JwxEtIHLFdP3ZBeq88WzAl.1 Enter Meeting ID: 829 0900 8392, and Passcode: 926600, and click on the “React” icon and using the “Raise Hand” button to speak on an item; or Dial +1-646-568-7788, enter 829 0900 8392# when prompted, enter # (pound) when prompted, enter 926600# when prompted, press *9 to raise the Hand icon to speak on an item, and press *6 to unmute when you are requested to speak. If you would like to participate in public comment anonymously, you may submit your comment online via Zoom by typing “Anonymous” when prompted to provide a name.

Kingsburg City Council Agenda
October 7, 2026

INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Invocation to be given by Cathleen Lawler, Police Chaplain, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Staci Smith.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
APPROVE AGENDA - To better accommodate members of the public or inconvenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed.

Additions to Agenda may be added only pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2 (b).

PRESENTATIONS AND INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:

None.

PUBLIC COMMENT - Provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items of interest to the public within the Council's jurisdiction and which are not already on the agenda this evening. It is the policy of the Council not to answer questions impromptu. Speakers should limit their comments to not more than THREE (3) minutes. For items which are on the agenda this evening, members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council as each item is brought up for discussion.

CONSENT CALENDAR - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and include a recommended action from Staff and shall be acted on by one motion of the Council. If a Council member requests additional information or would like to pull an item for discussion, that item shall be pulled from the Consent Calendar and acted upon separately. A motion to approve the Consent Calendar is deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar.

1. Approval of City Council Minutes: Approve the minutes from the September 16, 2026, Regular Council Meeting as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.

Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office

2. Ratify/approve payment of bills listed on the check register for the period September 8, 2026, through September 28, 2026, as prepared by Accounts Payable Clerk Rachelle Resendez.

Sponsor: Finance Department

3. Kingsburg Downtown Business Improvement District Board Appointment- Accept Mayor Smith’s appointment of Anneliese Hess to the Kingsburg Downtown Business Improvement District Board to a term that is set to expire November 2026.

Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office

4. Adopt Resolution 2026-043 confirming the acceptance of the ABC Alcohol Policing Partnership grant in the amount of $17,824.00 and directing staff to execute the grant agreement (Agreement Number 26-APP14). – Staff report by Police Chief Shaun Stephens Sponsor: Police Department

5. Adopt Resolution 2026-044 authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute the grant application for the Zero Emission Landscaping Equipment Voucher Program and authorize Kingsburg City Council Agenda
October 7, 2026
the purchase of the equipment of landscape equipment. – Staff report by Public Works Director Daniel Galvez
Sponsor: Public Works Department

6. Accept the Treasurer’s Report from April 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026.- Staff report by Finance Director Alma Colado
Sponsor: Finance Department

REGULAR CALENDAR

7. Matoian Agreement To Develop Vacant Land Discussion; APN 394-042-04 Presentation by City Manager Alexander Henderson
Sponsor: City Manager’s Office
Action deemed necessary

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council requests for future agenda items. Items require a consensus.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

COUNCIL REPORTS/COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Brief report by Council members on City related functions as authorized by the Brown Act.

ADJOURN REGULAR KINGSBURG CITY COUNCIL MEETING INTO CLOSED SESSION:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
California Government Code Section 54957.6
City Designated Representative: Alexander Henderson
Employee Organization: Kingsburg Professional Firefighters Association (KPFA)

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 1600 Draper Street, Kingsburg, CA
Agency Negotiator: Alexander Henderson
Under Negotiation: Lease Terms

ADJOURN OUT OF CLOSE SESSION INTO REGULAR KINGSBURG CITY

COUNCIL MEETING AND REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURN REGULAR KINGSBURG CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Kingsburg City Council Agenda
October 7, 2026
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Agenda was posted at the front entrance of City Hall not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 2nd day of October 2026.
___________________________________
Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk
Kingsburg City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 16, 2026

INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Invocation was given by Pastor Marlin Hiett, Kingsburg Covenant Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Staci Smith.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mayor Staci Smith called the regular meeting of the Kingsburg City Council to order at 6:00 p.m.

COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: David Silva, Vince Palomar, Laura North, Brandon Pursell, and Mayor Staci Smith.

COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None.

APPROVE AGENDA: A motion was made by Council Member Silva, seconded by Council Member North, to approve the agenda as published. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.

PRESENTATIONS AND INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:

Promotion Recognition of Police Department Personnel
Lieutenant Lee Forlines
Sergeant Miguel Guzman
Sergeant Jordan Gong
Sponsor: Police Department
PUBLIC COMMENT:

Adam Hughes, resident, representing the Kingsburg Aquatics, thanked the City and Council Members for the generous gift of the scoreboard.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

A motion was made by Council Member Silva, seconded by Council Member Palomar, to approve the items appearing on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.

1. Approval of City Council Minutes: Approve the minutes from the September 2, 2026, Regular Council Meeting as prepared by City Clerk Abigail Palsgaard.

Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office

2. Ratify/approve payment of bills listed on the check register for the period August 25, 2026, through September 7, 2026, as prepared by Accounts Payable Clerk Rachelle Resendez.

Sponsor: Finance Department

3. Kingsburg Downtown Business Improvement District Board Appointment- Accept Mayor Smith’s appointment of Penny Kyle to the Kingsburg Downtown Business Improvement District Board to a term that is set to expire November 2026.

Sponsor: City Clerk’s Office
Kingsburg City Council Minutes
September 2, 2026

REGULAR CALENDAR
November Ballot Initiatives Update- Report by Spencer Street, Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Presentation by Spencer Street, Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Sponsor: City Manager’s Office
Spencer Street gave a preview on what will be in the November ballot as well as the State and Federal activity. The Townsend Public Affairs, TPA, has engaged on behalf of the City in some other items that they are watching, that can impact the City moving into the future.

The three main things the TPA watches out for the City is the State Budget & Federal Funding Update, Priority State Legislation, and Looking Ahead (at the November Ballot).

FY26-27 Revenue Collection Report- Presentation by City Manager Alexander Henderson
Sponsor: City Manager’s Office
City Manager Henderson presented the Year End Fiscal Year 2026 Revenue Update. The vast majority of the discussion was based upon revenues for the General Fund and the 1% Measure E.

Informational – no action deemed necessary

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Henderson informed the council that Senator Hurtado’s office reached out about putting together a Check Presentation Ceremony as it relates to the $1,000,000.00 allocation They are still finalizing the date.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Silva reported that the Chamber brought in 16 new members and the Crayfish Festival financial position is going strong with positive cash flow and expenses are down. All the years’ events so far have posted positive cash flow.

Council Member North had nothing to report.

Council Member Palomar reported that the Public Safety Committee gave an update on the cameras in Kingsburg and update on the Drone Program. Officer Moon is qualified to fly the drone. The SKF Board passed a resolution to establish records management and retention policy.

They also passed a resolution proving and adopting the SKF Sanitation District collection system construction standards.

Council Member Pursell had nothing to report.

Mayor Smith reported that the BID had a workshop to discuss ideas for the Holiday Kickoff.

Kingsburg City Council Minutes
September 2, 2026
At 6:52pm Mayor Smith adjourned the Regular Kingsburg City Council Meeting.

Submitted by:
____________________________________
Karyl Bartel, Comm. Dev. Admin. Assist.

Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:
[email protected]
10/1/2026 3:59 PM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH 4789 US BANKCORP SERVICE CENTER 09/11/2026
Burrola 8/28/26 Amazon- under desk foot rest (Padilla) 42.49 Burrola 8/28/26 Hotel Stay- Reserve Coordinator Course (Forlines) 954.18 Burrola 8/28/26 Reconyx- Security Cameras 21.80
Burrola 8/28/26 RISE Conf. 2026 Registration (Chavez) 426.19 Burrola 8/28/26 Hotel Stay- Reserve Coordinator Course (Guzman) 1,004.18 Burrola 8/28/26 RISE Conf. 2026 Registration (Alves) 426.19 Burrola 8/28/26 Amazon- Wireless Mouse (Burrola, Padilla, Zimmerman) 261.39 Burrola 8/28/26 Amazon- printer ink (Burrola, Sgts Office) 341.94 Burrola 8/28/26 Hotel REFUND- Rise Conf. 2026 (Ruiz) -213.10 Burrola 8/28/26 Amazon- Wireless Mouse (Alves) 87.13
Burrola 8/28/26 Hotel Stay- Natnl Gang Violence Conf. (Meza) 1,054.70 Burrola 8/28/26 Surveillance Techniques Course Registration (Castellanos) 899.00 Burrola 8/28/26 RISE Conf. 2026- REFUND (Ruiz) -500.00
Burrola 8/28/26 RISE Conf. 2026 Registration (Colegio) 426.19 Colado 8/28/26 Staples- printer ink (Hernandez), tea, receipt tape 175.71 Colado 8/28/26 Amazon- File Folders (Lozano) 4.57
Colado 8/28/26 Staples- printer ink (Hernandez), tea, receipt tape 175.71 Colado 8/28/26 Amazon- File Folders (Lozano) 8.86
Colado 8/28/26 Amazon- File Folders (Lozano) 8.86
Colado 8/28/26 Amazon- File Folders (Lozano) 4.56
Cstnda 8/28/26 Sams Club- Senior Meal Program- Food 299.38 Cstnda 8/28/26 Sams Club- Senior Meal Program- Food 223.62 Cstnda 8/28/26 Senior Center Food Supply- Instacart 199.12 Cstnda 8/28/26 Sams Club- Senior Meal Program- Food 73.76 Cstnda 8/28/26 Amazon- Senior Meal Program- Food 139.44 Cstnda 8/28/26 Amazon- Senior Center- Food Containers 78.20 Cstnda 8/28/26 Sierra Packaging- Senior Center- Storage Containers 91.59 Cstnda 8/28/26 Community Services Fuel- August 58.52
Cstnda 8/28/26 Amazon- Senior Meal Program- Food 228.69 Cstnda 8/28/26 Pool Concession/Senior Food Service Instacart Subscription 99.00 Forlines8/28/26 Hotel Stay- LE Executive Summit 467.06
Galvez 8/28/26 APW- membership- Galvez 277.20
Galvez 8/28/26 Chlorine Tablets- Memorial Park Fountain 151.13 Galvez 8/28/26 Google TV 82.99
Galvez 8/28/26 Traffic/ Flag training- Flores, Galvez, Azevedo 49.15 Galvez 8/28/26 Car Wash- PW #652 39.99
Hndrsn 8/28/26 Amazon Prime Business Subscription 140.58 Hrndz 8/28/26 Panera Bread- Fraudulent Charge- REFUND -68.00 Hrndz 8/28/26 Kura Revolving Sushi- Fraudulent Charge- REFUND -64.27 Hrndz 8/28/26 ID Creator- Dept Badges 222.30
Hrndz 8/28/26 Js Taco Shop- burritos- captains mtg 66.29 Hrndz 8/28/26 Panera Bread- Fraudulent Charge- REFUND -42.00 Hrndz 8/28/26 Fandango- Fraudulent Charge- REFUND -46.00 Hrndz 8/28/26 Fandango- Fraudulent Charge- REFUND -93.00 Owen 8/28/26 Karyl- Permit Tech Study Companion 61.00
Owen 8/28/26 Amazon- Refrigerator Filter 41.41
Owen 8/28/26 Holly- Sierra Reatreat Registration 65.00
Plsgrd 8/28/26 Central Valley Clerks Meet Up Supplies/Snacks 91.42 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Plsgrd 8/28/26 Central Valley Clerks Meet Up Lunch (Chicken Nation) 173.46 Plsgrd 8/28/26 Central Valley Clerks Meet Up Supplies/Drinks-Table Covers 9.91 Plsgrd 8/28/26 Parking Fee- City of Fresno 1.24
Plsgrd 8/28/26 Council Chamber Supplies/Snacks 36.05
Roberts 8/28/26 Autozone- OES Rig- antifreeze,inverter 58.97 Roberts 8/28/26 Business Apple Subscription for Ipads 34.95 Salinas 8/28/26 Hotel Stay- LE Executive Summit 527.06
Stephens8/28/26 Hotel Stay- LE Executive Summit 467.06
Young 8/28/26 Anthopic- Claude Sub- Dariuss 20.00
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4789: 9,872.82
90168 4394 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. 09/11/2026
274862 NFPA Fire Helmet w/Ratchet Susp. x7; Det. Earlap;Chinstrap 3,860.34 Total for Check Number 90168: 3,860.34
90169 3565 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 09/11/2026
1FG3-7T4D-J9VJ 3 fold handtowels, trash bags, notebook 131.05 1GRT-TNF3-VLJ7 streamlight- E140 fleet 144.65
1QCQ-6M6G-CMKK engraver, heat gun-radio com 42.14
1YCX-P3CL-VD34 fire extinguisher, bracket 248.38
Total for Check Number 90169: 566.22
90170 3891 AMERICAN BUSINESS MACHINES 09/11/2026
885097 Fanance Copier Toner- Cyan 7.50
885097 Fanance Copier Toner- Cyan 7.50
Total for Check Number 90170: 15.00
90171 3029 AT&T CALNET 3 09/11/2026
0025777798 MN Phone Svc Charges 8/2/26-9/1/26 Acct (559) 897-6561 35.84 0025777798 MN Phone Svc Charges 8/2/26-9/1/26 Acct (559) 897-8942 26.14 0025777798 MN Phone Svc Charges 8/2/26-9/1/26 Acct (559) 897-2265 33.59 Total for Check Number 90171: 95.57
90172 3300 AVENU INSIGHTS & ANALYTICS 09/11/2026
INV004921 TAX-0029- Data & Analytics: Clearview Analytics 450.00 Total for Check Number 90172: 450.00
90173 4875 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 09/11/2026
86329255 Ambulance Medical Supplies 221.94
86342253 Ambulance Medical Supplies 229.54
Total for Check Number 90173: 451.48
90174 3507 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 09/11/2026
1580 New Explorer- Post 55; Elijiah Quiroz 95.00
Total for Check Number 90174: 95.00
90175 3054 BSK ASSOCIATES 09/11/2026
AJ120647 BACT 8-18-26 125.76
AJ120759 BACT 8-20-26 188.64
AJ120927 TCP Lead/Lag 8-10-26 290.44
AJ120929 TCP effluent 8-10-26 290.44
AJ121025 BACT 8-24-26 125.76
AJ122085 Nitrates 8-19-26 72.36
AJ19322 BACT 8-4-26 125.76
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
AJ19853 BACT 8-10-26 125.76
Total for Check Number 90175: 1,344.92
90176 5032 CALIFITNESS INC 09/11/2026
13266 Labor: Installed replacement parts on treadmill 115.00 Total for Check Number 90176: 115.00
90177 3059 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC INSTITUTE 09/11/2026
2323 Health & Wellness (Kroeger) 400.00
2324 Health & Wellness (Lomeli) 100.00
2324 Health & Wellness (Chavez) 200.00
Total for Check Number 90177: 700.00
90178 3831 ADAM CASTANEDA 09/11/2026
9/9/26-9/11/26 Per Diem- CPRS Leadership Summit 215.00
Sept 2026 Monthly Cell Phone Allowance- Sept 2026 75.00 Total for Check Number 90178: 290.00
90179 4491 GABRIEL CASTELLANOS 09/11/2026
9/21/26-9/22/26 Per Diem- Vehicle Containment Techniques Course 46.00 9/23/26 Per Diem- Vehicle Extraction Techniques Course 23.00 Total for Check Number 90179: 69.00
90180 5021 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA S.P.C.A 09/11/2026
77096 TNR- Aug 2026 625.00
Total for Check Number 90180: 625.00
90181 3080 CHADS AUTO GLASS 09/11/2026
112189 Passenger Door Window- PW #611 357.32
Total for Check Number 90181: 357.32
90182 3918 CINTAS 09/11/2026
Aug 2026 Uniforms- MN- Public Works 8/1/26-8/31/26 212.80 Aug 2026 Uniforms- MN- Public Works 8/1/26-8/31/26 422.16 Aug 2026 Uniforms- MN- Public Works 8/1/26-8/31/26 65.17 Aug 2026 Uniforms- MN- Public Works 8/1/26-8/31/26 81.95 Aug 2026 Uniforms- MN- Public Works 8/1/26-8/31/26 63.17 Total for Check Number 90182: 845.25
90183 3607 CIVICPLUS 09/11/2026
369408 Annual Ordinance Supplement Fee 1,467.87
Total for Check Number 90183: 1,467.87
90185 4615 EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES 09/11/2026
EFRE-00391292 Linens and mats 8/16-8/22/26 440.67
EFRE-00392448 Linens and mats 8/23-8/31/26 412.35
Total for Check Number 90185: 853.02
90186 5235 ERMA 09/11/2026
CSJ-00124-3Q26 ERMA 3Q26 Dollar one Billing for Program Yr. 2026 37.50 CSJ-00124-3Q26 ERMA 3Q26 Dollar one Billing for Program Yr. 2025 5,202.00 CSJ-00124-4Q26 ERMA 4Q26 Dollar one Billing for Program Yr. 2026 24,962.50 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
CSJ-00124-4Q26 ERMA 4Q26 Dollar one Billing for Program Yr. 2025 19,549.50 Total for Check Number 90186: 49,751.50
90187 3633 FRESNO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 09/11/2026 3357 E141 6" White Reflective Radio Decal 30.36
3416 Anderson Village Reorganization 226.02
3416 Kamm- Academy Northeast No. 1 Reorganization 654.43 3416 Mendocino- Klepper Northwest Reorganization 129.64 3416 Kamm- Academy Northwest Reorganization 511.62
3416 Kamm- Bethel Northwest Reorganization 1,405.12
3416 Mendocino- Kamm Northwest Reorganization 1,628.97
3416 Kamm- Academy Northwest No. 2 Reorganization 214.63 3416 Matoian Reorganization 466.76
Total for Check Number 90187: 5,267.55
90188 3188 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF 09/11/2026
SO23855 Dispatch Services- September 2026 19,827.86
SO23855 RMS/JMS Access Fees- September 2026 154.99
Total for Check Number 90188: 19,982.85
90189 4932 FRESNO OXYGEN/BARNES WELDING 09/11/2026
0063817092 Pool Cylinder Maintenance/Rental- Service Charge 7.22 0063817430 Service Charge 1.41
0091748515 Pool Cylinder maintenance/rental 240.78
0091759799 Pool Cylinder Maintenance/Rental 240.78
0091760651 Medical Oxygen 93.79
0091763472 Pool Cylinder Maintenance/Rental 240.78
Total for Check Number 90189: 824.76
90190 5001 G&H DIESEL SERVICE, INC. 09/11/2026
53157 A502- Tomar Installation,Back Cabinet Door Repair,90 dy BIT Insp 2,810.86 Total for Check Number 90190: 2,810.86
90191 3219 HEALTHWISE SERVICES 09/11/2026
231143 Kiosk Lease Fee- Site Charges- Manifest #1770937 8/7/26 184.88 Total for Check Number 90191: 184.88
90192 3221 ALEX HENDERSON 09/11/2026
9/22/26-9/25/26 Cal Legue of Cities Conf.- Per Diem 301.00 Total for Check Number 90192: 301.00
90193 3222 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 09/11/2026
60926451 Ambulance Medical Supplies 250.53
60929227 Ambulance Medical Supplies 166.58
61226110 Ambulance Medical Supplies 214.13
Total for Check Number 90193: 631.24
90194 5144 APRIL JOHNSON 09/11/2026
083126AJ TNR Reimb.- Aug 2026 HOPE services 160.00
Total for Check Number 90194: 160.00
90195 3329 JOLENE POLYACK MARKETING 09/11/2026
3292 Economic Development- August 2026 3,333.75
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 4 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90195: 3,333.75
90196 3248 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP 09/11/2026
35433 Business General- Peterson Pitchess Motion 2,202.95 35434 General Business- Subpoena File 66.00
35726 Professional Services- General Retainer Aug 2026 600.00 35726 Professional Services- General Retainer Aug 2026 6,375.00 35726 Professional Services- General Retainer Aug 2026 525.00 Total for Check Number 90196: 9,768.95
90197 3253 KINGSBURG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE09/11/2026
Sept 2026 Monthly Budget Allowance- Sept 2026 2,500.00
Total for Check Number 90197: 2,500.00
90198 3254 KINGSBURG CHEVRON 09/11/2026
Aug 2026 ACT Car Washes (1 x $5) 5.00
Aug 2026 ME Car Washes (17 x $5) 85.00
Aug 2026 GF Car Washes (38 x $5) 190.00
Aug 2026 SRO KES Car Washes (3 x $5) 15.00
Aug 2026 SRO KHS Car Washes (3 x $5) 15.00
Total for Check Number 90198: 310.00
90199 3625 KINGSBURG MEDIA FOUNDATION 09/11/2026
106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 30.47 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 73.82 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 37.26 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 14.38 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 14.38 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 18.40 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 11.76 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 12.50 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 1.74 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 148.31 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 8.69 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 65.04 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 7.03 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 26.04 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 3.43 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 82.89 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 20.72 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 14.38 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 33.76 106-20260827-1 Service Agreement Increase- July & Aug 2026 50.00 106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 131.25
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 20.00
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 240.00
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 65.68 106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 189.47
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 0.17 106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 24.88
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 181.67
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 213.81
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 18.26
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 6.30 106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 50.23
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 217.60
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 1.46 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 5 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 62.08
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 172.97
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 16.67
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 44.10
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 17.25
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 60.00
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 47.37
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 20.00
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 150.94
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 273.44
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 102.90
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 74.75
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 31.39 106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 1,464.26
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 391.26
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 91.28
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 112.50
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 7.60 106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 48.50
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 303.16
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 3.40
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 44.10
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 6.70
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 19.80
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 19.38
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 4.98
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 16.25 106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 114.81
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 120.82
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 134.24
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 525.00
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 67.95
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 25.60
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 262.50
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 73.83
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 76.67
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 76.56
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 100.00
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 305.16
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 0.42
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 3.75 106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 3.71 106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 20.00 106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 7.60 106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 6.55
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 682.93
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 9.81
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 50.75
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 48.50
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 81.25
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 868.12
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 354.48
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 123.49
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 20.63
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 23.00
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 13.33 106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 33.66
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 193.26
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 7.60 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 870.39
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 44.10
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 89.38
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 5.02 106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 89.00
106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 18.75
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 0.74 106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 10.05
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 32.57
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 319.92
106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 48.50
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 193.20
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 2.63 106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 130.60
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 17.63 106-20260901-1 Internet Sept 2026 20.00
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 35.97
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 56.45
106-20260901-1 E-Mail Sept 2026 75.79
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 9.73 106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 45.00
106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 150.94
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 16.42 106-20260901-1 Service Agreement Sept 2026 150.94
106-20260901-1 Licensse Fee- Emails Sept 2026 (66 Emails) 26.99 106-20260901-1 Phones Sept 2026 17.00
Total for Check Number 90199: 12,556.50
90200 5229 KNOX COMPANY 09/11/2026
INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 - 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 - S/H 435.00 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 - 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 Item SMS-1002C1 - 721.00 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 - 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 - Taxes 2,110.74 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209-8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 Item 5541 MedVault 2,320.00 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 Item 5801 Station V 3,148.00 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 - 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 Item KD-1KM1 KeyD 919.00 INV-KA-558209 9/1/2026 Inv-KA-558209 - 8/13/26 - QT-KA-77905 Item S241 Medvaul 16,696.00 Total for Check Number 90200: 26,349.74
90201 4668 SEAN KOPAS 09/11/2026
10/13-10/17 Per Diem- Excellance Class 10/13-10/15, insp new amb 10/16-10/17 302.00 Total for Check Number 90201: 302.00
90202 5234 LEO TIDWELL EXCAVATING 09/11/2026
Meter Refund Refund Hydrant Meter Deposit after water usage calc. 1,584.38 Total for Check Number 90202: 1,584.38
90203 4319 KENNY LEQUIN 09/11/2026
8/29/26 Lenquin Safety Boot Reimb. 156.96
Total for Check Number 90203: 156.96
90204 3784 LEXIPOL, LLC 09/11/2026
INVLEX11270608 Annual Fire/Training Policy/Bulletins Renewal 7/1/26-6/30/27 3,372.39 INVLEX11270608 Annual Fire/Training Policy/Bulletins Renewal 7/1/26-6/30/27 3,372.39 Total for Check Number 90204: 6,744.78
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 7 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
90205 4194 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE-KINGSBURG09/11/2026
177014 PW/Water- Well #12- Vinyl Tubing PVC 11.60
177055 PW/Water- CM Socket 11pc 16.26
177560 FD 2 & Senior Center repairs 54.63
177665 PW/Water- Midget Fuse 20A 48.79
177671 PW/Water- Midget Fuse 20A RETURN -24.40
177672 PW/Water- 50/50 Antifreeze- Generator #13 17.56
177673 PW/Parks- Dog Food 102.49
177697 E140 Carbide Chainsaw Blade 384.45
177698 hardware 1.08
177700 PW/Water- Seasonings 21.46
177711 claw pic hangers, anchor bolts, block FT 61.76
177856 PW/Parks- sprinkler valve 29.28
177865 PW/Parks- solid pipe, union pvc, pipe adaptor, pvc nipple 38.56 177867 PW/Parks- hobby hacksaw blades 6" 3.89
177885 PW/Parks- conduit locknut,gasket tip toe drain,push couplings 61.04 177890 PW/Water- Clamp 3/4 to 1 3/4" 5.84
177891 PW/Parks- union pvc,adaptor,valve,sol pipe + returns 1.56 177912 PW/Parks- safety pin cstl x 3 19.30
177922 PW/Parks- PTFE tape, sprinkler valvue 111.18
177940 Chain x2 for saws 98.06
Total for Check Number 90205: 1,064.39
90206 3312 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 09/11/2026
4445-111462 Blue Def 2.5gal x2 37.03
4445-114580 Battery w/Core Exchange 184.86
4445-114581 Return Battery, Core Return -206.86
4445-120470 Ring Terminal 11.43
4445-137717 Blue Def Drum 55gal 309.49
4445-144499 Antifreeze x2, Brake Cleaner x2 62.68
4445-151316 Parks #601- wiper blades 15.23
4445-151949 Parks TW- Spark Plug x2 13.75
4445-490137 Return Core x2 -44.00
4445-490236 Blue Def Drum 55 gal 411.93
4445-490299 RETURN Blue Def Drum 55 gal -411.93
4445-491572 Coolant Hose 6.79
Total for Check Number 90206: 390.40
90207 3611 HOLLY OWEN 09/11/2026
Sept 2026 Monthly Cell Phone Allowance- Sept 2026 75.00 Total for Check Number 90207: 75.00
90208 3315 P G & E 09/11/2026
7/27/26-8/25/26 Electricity 7/27/26-8/25/26; Acct #9285082237-7 108.97 7/29/26-8/27/26 Electricity 7/29/26-8/27/26; Acct #1628344672-8 978.59 Total for Check Number 90208: 1,087.56
90209 4885 PACIFIC SHREDDING 09/11/2026
5329790 City Hall paper shredding services 8/7/26 30.80 5329790 City Hall paper shredding services 8/7/26 30.80 5329801 PD Shredding Services 8/7/26 56.00
Total for Check Number 90209: 117.60
90210 3450 ABIGAIL PALSGAARD 09/11/2026
9/17/26 CCAC Advanced Records Management for Municipal clerks- Per Diem 215.00 Sept 2026 Monthly Cell Phone Allowance- Sept 2026 75.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 8 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90210: 290.00
90211 5233 PAUL'S. CERTIFIED APPLIANCE 09/11/2026
129308 Station 1 refrigerator: WR55X32080 door board, WR60X32568 auger 306.63 Total for Check Number 90211: 306.63
90212 5142 DOVEY PLAIN 09/11/2026
083126DP August TNR Reimb. 3,324.00
Total for Check Number 90212: 3,324.00
90213 3333 PRICE PAIGE&COMPANY, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT 09/11/2026 39493 Work in Prog. on prep of bank rec for year end June 30,2026 352.80 39493 Work in Prog. on prep of bank rec for year end June 30,2026 630.00 39493 Work in Prog. on prep of bank rec for year end June 30,2026 277.20 Total for Check Number 90213: 1,260.00
90214 3334 PROFESSIONAL PRINT & MAIL, INC 09/11/2026
131148 Statements- Delinquent Notices- August 2026; Qty 813 174.86 131148 Statements- Delinquent Notices- August 2026; Qty 813 174.86 131239 Statements- Monthly Utlity Bills- September 2026; Qty 3696 654.67 131239 Statements- Monthly Utlity Bills- September 2026; Qty 3696 654.67 Total for Check Number 90214: 1,659.06
90215 3337 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 09/11/2026
132220 Professional Services- studies for new City Hall 6/1/26-6/30/26 500.00 Total for Check Number 90215: 500.00
90216 3341 QUINN COMPANY 09/11/2026
WON50037884 KPD-Gcu- Engine heater coolant 1,586.23
Total for Check Number 90216: 1,586.23
90217 5230 SCHEDULE2.IT 09/11/2026
S2-1458 White Barcode Seals x500 125.00
S2-1458 Control Value Colors Sheets x3 105.00
S2-1458 Annual Truck License- Narcotic Inventory x6 1,560.00 S2-1458 On Boarding- virtual (set up, data import, training, in service) 525.00 S2-1458 S2 box- large x1 80.00
S2-1458 Optional DEA compliance features x1 260.00
S2-1458 S2 box- small x1 72.00
S2-1458 Annual Station License x1 260.00
Total for Check Number 90217: 2,987.00
90218 UB*00093 SUSAN SERNA 09/11/2026
Refund Check 008306-000, 587 SUNSET ST 1.75
Refund Check 008306-000, 587 SUNSET ST 3.60
Refund Check 008306-000, 587 SUNSET ST 32.57
Refund Check 008306-000, 587 SUNSET ST 38.06
Total for Check Number 90218: 75.98
90219 3368 SIGN RANCH BY ROD'S CUSTOM SIGNS09/11/2026
16824 8 city polos 207.32
Total for Check Number 90219: 207.32
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 9 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
90220 3369 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC. 09/11/2026
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 106.63
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 688.37
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 141.42
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 66.47
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 559.10
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 246.79
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 106.63
206837CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 8/16-8/31/26 169.03
206838CT GF Fuels 1,977.21
206838CT ACT Fuels (Castellanos) 672.28
206838CT ME Fuels (Salinas,Forlines,Ruiz,Chavez,Bustillos,Gomez) 1,349.14 206838CT SRO KHS Fuels (Moon) 87.19
206838CT SRO KES (Jimenez) 220.61
206839CT Fuel- Ambulance 8/16-8/31/26 1,188.34
206839CT Fuel- Measure E 8/16-8/31/26 1,188.34
206839CT Fuel- Fire 8/16-8/31/26 1,188.35
Total for Check Number 90220: 9,955.90
90221 4274 SPRINGBROOK FINANCE HOLDING COM09/PANY, INC. 11/2026 INV-024877 Civic Pay Transaction Fee 372.00
INV-024877 Civic Pay Transaction Fee 372.00
Total for Check Number 90221: 744.00
90222 3378 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 09/11/2026
6072948961 binderclips,bus. cards,staples,6 pk folder,pencil pouch 124.42 6072949862 Clorox wipes,tab dividers,pencil puch,cardstock paper, ink 411.34 Total for Check Number 90222: 535.76
90223 4028 SUPERIOR POOL CARE 09/11/2026
5279 Chlorine- Well #16 923.94
5280 Chlorine- Well #12 986.94
5304 Pool Chlorine Delivery 8/12/26 1,059.43
5308 Pool Service- August 2026 3,150.00
Total for Check Number 90223: 6,120.31
90224 3484 SWANK MOTION PICTURE, INC. 09/11/2026
4391708 Dive in Movie Series- The Iron Giant 400.00
4398892 Dive in Movie Series- Goat 400.00
Total for Check Number 90224: 800.00
90225 4827 SWEEPING CORP OF AMERICA LLC 09/11/2026
2026-008090 Subdivision Kamm & S. Academy Aug 2026 400.00 2026-008090 Streets, Medians, Subdivisions Aug 2026 3,675.00 2026-008090 New Subdivision 20th & Azalea/ Solig & 20th Aug 2026 1,600.00 2026-008090 Air Sweep for the month of Aug 2026 17,500.00 2026-008090 Kings Crossing Aug 2026 350.00
2026-008090 Subdivision 16th & Kern Aug 2026 800.00
Total for Check Number 90225: 24,325.00
90226 5119 SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA INC 09/11/2026
584071855 Senior Center- August Food Supply- Sysco 2,609.85 Total for Check Number 90226: 2,609.85
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 10 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
90227 3612 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING 09/11/2026
INV151254 Target Solutions- Vector Check IT LE Stations 10/1/26-9/30/27 1,492.05 Total for Check Number 90227: 1,492.05
90228 3396 THE BUSINESS JOURNAL 09/11/2026
2026-11652 Invoice 2026-11652 Election 444.00
Total for Check Number 90228: 444.00
90229 4636 THE MOWERS EDGE INC 09/11/2026
230450 Carburetor for Honda 16100-ZH, spark plugs, oil, air cleaner 167.72 Total for Check Number 90229: 167.72
90230 4788 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC. 09/11/2026
25898 Consulting services for the month of Sept 2026 6,000.00 Total for Check Number 90230: 6,000.00
90231 3411 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 09/11/2026
349539845 Lease-Rent 1316 Lewis St. Access Public Parking 6,333.86 Total for Check Number 90231: 6,333.86
90232 5127 VERATHON INC 09/11/2026
81476894 GlideScope Go 2 Monitor kit x1 ( $1,4000 discount) 2,000.00 81476894 Carrying casr kit, go 2 large 155.00
81476894 Shipping/Handling 92.00
81476894 GS Go 2 1 year extended warranty 444.00
81476894 Sales Tax 319.06
Total for Check Number 90232: 3,010.06
90233 3419 VIKING CLEANING SERVICE 09/11/2026
Sept 2026 Janitorial Services- Sept 2026 3,864.28
Total for Check Number 90233: 3,864.28
90234 3493 VILLAGE TIRE SALES INC 09/11/2026
38755 PW Mower #306- 2 tires 299.55
38756 PW Mower #303- 2 tires 299.55
38794 PD #2122- Sensor/tire pressure monitor system 85.92 Total for Check Number 90234: 685.02
90235 3421 VINCENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 09/11/2026
92587 KNG P150 RF Connector, Tech Labor 291.03
Total for Check Number 90235: 291.03
90236 4689 WATERMEN 09/11/2026
505675 Lifeguard gear- whistles/Jackets 1,925.22
505675-2 Lifeguard gear- whistles/Jackets- missing from first order 85.00 Total for Check Number 90236: 2,010.22
90237 3469 WECO SUPPLY CO., INC. 09/11/2026
982786 PW Cyl Rental 8/31/26 39.06
Total for Check Number 90237: 39.06
90238 3448 CHRISTINA WINDOVER 09/11/2026
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 11 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Sept 2026 Monthly Cell Phone Allowance- Sept 2026 75.00 Total for Check Number 90238: 75.00
90239 3430 BETTY WONG, 09/11/2026
Sept 2026 Wong Bldg Leases- Sept 2026 3,000.00
Total for Check Number 90239: 3,000.00
Total for 9/11/2026: 253,029.80
ACH 3231 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP - WIRE 457 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 457 Percent - Mission Square PR Batch 00003.09.2026 457 Percent - Mission Square 505.09 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Roth % PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Roth % 286.72 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 457 Mission Square PR Batch 00003.09.2026 457 Mission Square 7,708.66 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Roth Flat Rate PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Roth Flat Rate 100.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3231: 8,600.47
ACH 3470 Internal Revenue Service - ACH 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Federal Income Tax 25,316.21 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Medicare Employee Portion PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Medicare Employee Portion 4,572.09 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 FICA Employee Portion PR Batch 00003.09.2026 FICA Employee Portion 18,695.10 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Medicare Employer Portion PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Medicare Employer Portion 4,505.07 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 FICA Employer Portion PR Batch 00003.09.2026 FICA Employer Portion 18,695.10 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3470: 71,783.57
ACH 3471 Employment Development Department - ACH09/18/2026 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 State Income Tax PR Batch 00003.09.2026 State Income Tax 9,879.36 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 CA SDI PR Batch 00003.09.2026 CA SDI 3,577.57 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3471: 13,456.93
ACH 3472 CalPERS - ACH 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPRPR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPR A 4850 A 4850 466.08 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. Classic ER PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. Classic ER 4,406.25 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. PEPRA PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. PEPRA 4,985.63 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire PEPRA ER PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire PEPRA ER 7,018.40 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire -ClassicPR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire -Classic 1,698.39 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police 1,714.78 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPRAPR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPRA 8,541.78 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire PEPRAPR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire PEPRA 6,937.68 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police ER PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police ER 4,456.20 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire ER PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Fire ER 4,414.15 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. PEPRA ER PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. PEPRA ER 5,149.36 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. Classic PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Misc. Classic 2,548.78 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPRPR Batch 00003.09.2026 PERS Safety Police PEPR A ER A ER 9,112.67 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3472: 61,450.15
ACH 3476 CHILD SUPPORT STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - ACH 09/18/2026 PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Child Support PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Child Support 246.91 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3476: 246.91
ACH 4707 ICMA-WIRE 401(A) 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 Def Comp 401(a) ICMAPR Batch 00003.09.2026 Def Comp 401(a) ICMA 250.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4707: 250.00
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 12 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
90240 3660 KPFA 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 KPFA - Union Dues PR Batch 00003.09.2026 KPFA - Union Dues 640.00 Total for Check Number 90240: 640.00
90241 3525 Kingsburg Police KPOA 09/18/2026
PR Batch 00003.09.2026 KPOA Union Dues PR Batch 00003.09.2026 KPOA Union Dues 1,010.00 Total for Check Number 90241: 1,010.00
Total for 9/18/2026: 157,438.03
ACH 4789 US BANKCORP SERVICE CENTER 09/25/2026
Burrola 9/11/26 World's Finest Chocolate- 35 boxes (Explorer Program) 1,713.60 Burrola 9/11/26 Central Calif. Women's Conf. 2026 (Burrola) 310.50 Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- wireless mouse REFUND -87.13
Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- screen cleaner, lithium battery 5pk x10 150.87 Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- lithium battery 9pk x 4 REFUND -37.04 Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- Lithium Battery 9pk x4 37.04
Burrola 9/11/26 Tempoarary Holding Cells Registration (Colegio) 105.19 Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- Nitrile Gloves 93.98
Burrola 9/11/26 Hotel Stay- Intoximeters Training (Fuentes) 151.20 Burrola 9/11/26 Amazon- sticky not holder 2pc (Padilla) 10.34 Colado 9/11/26 Staples- highlighters,copy paper,coffee,tape 72.76 Colado 9/11/26 Staples- batteries, yellow copy paper 40.25 Colado 9/11/26 Staples- batteries, yellow copy paper 40.25 Colado 9/11/26 Staples- highlighters,copy paper,coffee,tape 72.77 Cstnda 9/11/26 Selma Kia- Community Services Car Wipers 47.96 Cstnda 9/11/26 Sams Club- Senior Meal Program Supplies/Food 86.04 Cstnda 9/11/26 Amazon- Senior Center- printer paper 53.39 Cstnda 9/11/26 Community Services Dept- Grammerly Subscription 144.00 Cstnda 9/11/26 3J's- Community Services Vehicle Gas 63.56 Cstnda 9/11/26 Amazon- Senior Center- pen refills, calendar, dish cloths 98.62 Cstnda 9/11/26 Selma Kia- Comm Svcs Car- HCA Inspect/Replace, oil chng 94.83 Cstnda 9/11/26 Amazon- Senior Center Calendar 13.07
Cstnda 9/11/26 Sams Club Senior Center Meal Program Supplies/Food 181.41 Cstnda 9/11/26 Sams Club- Senior Meal Program Supplies/Food 243.95 Cstnda 9/11/26 Sams Club Senior Center Meal Program Supplies/Food 97.81 Forlines9/11/26 Hotel Stay- Police Chiefs Workshop 880.86 Galvez 9/11/26 Street Sign- Work Ahead 153.66
Galvez 9/11/26 Amazon- LED drivers- Street Lights 244.65 Galvez 9/11/26 Amazon- flags- US, Swedish- Vets 347.66
Hndrsn 9/11/26 Monthly ChatGPT Subscription 20.00
Hrndz 9/11/26 Tollhouse Leather- Helmet Shields Probational 431.48 Hrndz 9/11/26 Career Success Library Subscription- Rolinda 19.00 Hrndz 9/11/26 Fungs Kitchen- Fraudulent Charge- Credit Pending 73.58 Hrndz 9/11/26 Js Taco Shop- burritos- Panel FF/EMT position 55.29 Hrndz 9/11/26 Paypal Subscription for Amb 25.00
Hrndz 9/11/26 Wilmas- Fraudulent Charge- Credit Pending 47.00 Hrndz 9/11/26 Panera Bread- Fraudulent Charge- Credit Pending 53.77 Hrndz 9/11/26 Zazzle- Plaque for Fer Yang 100.33
Hrndz 9/11/26 Bookeo Amb Subscription for CPR 39.95
Hrndz 9/11/26 Truth BBQ- Fraudulent Charge- Credit Pending 96.34 Osborne 9/11/26 California Jumping of Fresno- Open House Bounce House 93.65 Owen 9/11/26 Amazon (for HR)- chair cover 21.78
Plsgrd 9/11/26 Richard Griffin Gift Card- CheyAnne's 350.00 Plsgrd 9/11/26 California Municipal Revenue TA Membership- Palsgaard 400.00 Plsgrd 9/11/26 Sandbags 512.00
Plsgrd 9/11/26 CA League of Cities Conf. Lunch Cancellantion- Pursell -25.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 13 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Plsgrd 9/11/26 CA League of Cities Conf. Cancellation- Palomar -600.00 Plsgrd 9/11/26 NAGARA Membership- Palsgaard 89.00
Plsgrd 9/11/26 CA League of Cities Conf. Cancellation- Pursell -600.00 Plsgrd 9/11/26 Richard Griffin Retirement Card 4.35
Plsgrd 9/11/26 Sandbags- BID 56.89
Plsgrd 9/11/26 Admin Car Wash 8.00
Plsgrd 9/11/26 ChatGPT Subscription- Palsgaard 8.00
Plsgrd 9/11/26 CA League of Cities Conf. Lunch Cancellantion- Palomar -25.00 Roberts 9/11/26 Ventura TV Electronics & Appliances- Stn 2 washer,dryer 3,058.70 Roberts 9/11/26 Hotel- League of Ca Cities Conf.- Roberts 265.69 Roberts 9/11/26 League of Ca Cities Member Dues- Roberts 500.00 Salinas 9/11/26 Hotel Stay- Police Chiefs Workshop 830.86 Stphens 9/11/26 Hotel Stay- Police Chief's Workshop 880.86 Stphens 9/11/26 Amazon- keyboard case 147.02
Stphens 9/11/26 Amazon- typecase Edge + keyboard case 129.24 Stphens 9/11/26 Amazon- Logitech Signature Slim MK955 124.22 Stphens 9/11/26 Amazon- keyboard case RETURN -147.02
Wndvr 9/11/26 Best Best and Krieger 132.00
Wndvr 9/11/26 Best Best and Krieger 132.00
Young 9/11/26 Red Helmet Fire Training- Dom Smith, Jeremy Cazares 512.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4789: 13,247.53
90242 3565 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 09/25/2026
14DC-NT1Y-KD1T pressure washer connector, grip 655.20
1DQT-N3X7-76LK screen protector- Ipads/amb 38.76
1DVG-QDM4-KJJ7 car wash supplies 65.80
1F67-H97P-1CX4 glow sticks, mylar blanket- CERT Supply 121.66 1LJQ-1CFR-M6W3 dept supplies- Lysol, batteries 177.77
1MFQ-X6FM-CLLN CERT training supply- filtration straw 21.73 1QLJ-TWNY-MCTW banner background drop 221.94
1V1C-CPNX-J7VR coordless battery blowers 131.04
1YN1-XXXR-1CLY ice chests, extinguisher- dept tools 550.94 Total for Check Number 90242: 1,984.84
90243 3891 AMERICAN BUSINESS MACHINES 09/25/2026
886592 Finance Copier Contract 166.86
886592 Finance Copier Contract 166.87
888251 Building Dept. Copier Contract 138.68
Total for Check Number 90243: 472.41
90244 4628 JOSEFINO AREVALO 09/25/2026
9/29/26-10/1/26 Per Diem- Intro to Science- Based Interviewing 57.00 Total for Check Number 90244: 57.00
90245 5236 ASSOCIATED TRAFFIC SAFETY INC 09/25/2026
16979 Stop Signs x8 720.62
Total for Check Number 90245: 720.62
90246 4307 AT & T MOBILITY 09/25/2026
Aug Body Cam SRO Body Cam 23/MDT 23 (Moon) H 83.48
Aug Body Cam SRO Body Cam 10/MDT 46 (Jimenez) E 83.48
Aug Body Cam ACT Body Cam 8/MDT29 (Castellanos) 83.48
Aug Body Cam ME Body Cam (Bustillos, Chavez, Salinas, Ruiz, Forlines, Gomez) 250.44 Aug Body Cam GF Body Cam (Aug 3- Sept 2) 709.59
Aug Cell Phones SRO Cell Phones (Jimenez) E 40.76
Aug Cell Phones GF Cell Phones (Aug 3- Sept 2) 761.25
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 14 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Aug Cell Phones Act Cell Phones (Castellanos) 40.76
Aug Cell Phones ME Cell Phones (Bustillos,Chavez,Salinas,Ruiz,Forlines,Gomez) 378.10 Aug Cell Phones SRO Cell Phones (Moon) H 40.76
Total for Check Number 90246: 2,472.10
90247 4875 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 09/25/2026
86351501 Ambulance Medical Supplies 31.81
86354988 Ambulance Medical Supplies 154.38
86358544 Ambulance Medical Supplies 684.44
86363609 Ambulance Medical Supplies 238.23
Total for Check Number 90247: 1,108.86
90248 3054 BSK ASSOCIATES 09/25/2026
AJ21973 BACT 9/1/26 125.76
AJ22159 EPA 504.1 DBCP/EDB 8/20/26 604.60
AJ22656 EPA 533 PFAS 8/25/26 2,266.90
AJ22723 BACT 9/14/26 125.76
AJ22847 EPA 533 PFAS 8/26/26 453.38
AJ23436 BACT 9/16/26 188.64
AJ23841 BACT 9/14/26 116.76
Total for Check Number 90248: 3,881.80
90249 4456 CORINA BURROLA 09/25/2026
9/15/26 Per Diem- CCWC Conf. 9/15/26 23.00
Total for Check Number 90249: 23.00
90250 5086 ANTHONY BUSTILLOS 09/25/2026
10/9/26 Per Diem- Building Searches for Patrol Course 23.00 Total for Check Number 90250: 23.00
90251 3056 CAL STATE TERMITE AND PEST 09/25/2026
0485228 Pool Rodent Control 15.00
0485243 Police Pest Control 35.00
0485243 Pool Pest Control 56.50
0485243 Fire Pest Control 35.00
0485243 City Buildings Pest Control 168.50
0485243 Senior Center Pest Control 35.00
0485243 Amb Pest Control 35.00
0485243 Memorial/ Downtown Park Pest Control 95.00
Total for Check Number 90251: 475.00
90252 4429 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC 09/25/2026
43841718 Senior Center Printer Services (Back Printer)- Sept 2026 147.35 43841724 CL Maintenamce Overage (8/1/26-8/31/26) 50.78
43841724 Contract Charge (9/1/26-9/30/26) 252.08
43844610 Police Canon Copier Contract- Sept 2026 566.50 43860005 Senior Center Printer Services (Front Printer)- Sept 2026 472.33 43869755 PW Copier Contract 7/1/26-9/30/26 437.11
43881388 CL Maintenance Overage (8/1/26-8/31/26) 60.87
43881388 Maintenance & Service (9/1/26-9/30/26) 43.86
43881388 Contract Charge (9/1/26-9/30/26) 225.05
43881391 Copier Contract- Building Dept. 9/1/26-9/30/26 304.41 4388389 City Hall Copier Contract Sept 2026 229.54
4388389 City Hall Copier Contract Sept 2026 229.54
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 15 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90252: 3,019.42
90253 4491 GABRIEL CASTELLANOS 09/25/2026
9/28/26-9/30/26 Per Diem- Surveillance Techniques 69.00 Total for Check Number 90253: 69.00
90254 5021 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA S.P.C.A 09/25/2026
78342 TNR Services 313.00
Total for Check Number 90254: 313.00
90255 3551 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY 09/25/2026
348906 Case #26-0991 150.00
Total for Check Number 90255: 150.00
90256 5077 STEPHANIE CHAVEZ 09/25/2026
10/9/26 Per Diem- Building Searches for Patrol Course 23.00 Total for Check Number 90256: 23.00
90257 3822 ALMA COLADO 09/25/2026
9/15/26-9/18/26 Reissue Ck 90184- Per Diem- CAJPA Conf. 9/15-18,2026 301.00 Sept 2026 Reissue Ck 90184- Monthly Cell Phone Allowance- Sept 2026 75.00 Total for Check Number 90257: 376.00
90258 4488 COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS 09/25/2026
867 Perishable Skills POST IV (Carey,Fuentes,Gong,Fan,Gagnon,Moon) 630.00 Total for Check Number 90258: 630.00
90259 3119 COOK'S COMMUNICATIONS CORP. 09/25/2026
164927 BK Vehicle Charger x2 550.42
Total for Check Number 90259: 550.42
90260 4448 CORE & MAIN 09/25/2026
Z655695 Repair Parts 222.76
Z693210 Repair Parts 791.47
Total for Check Number 90260: 1,014.23
90261 3148 DON BERRY CONSTRUCTION INC 09/25/2026
Pymnt #2 (2026) Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project 67,875.75 Pymnt #2 (2026) Retention- Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project -6,889.29 Pymnt #2 (2026) Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project 69,910.00 Pymnt #2 (2026) Retention- Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project -8,768.94 Pymnt #2 (2026) Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project 121,482.00 Pymnt #2 (2026) Kingsburg 2026 Streets Project 53,896.75 Total for Check Number 90261: 297,506.27
90262 4645 ELITE UNIFORMS 09/25/2026
JJ2W3488 Belt (Roberts) 48.75
Total for Check Number 90262: 48.75
90263 4615 EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES 09/25/2026
EFRE-00395371 Linens and mats 9/1-9/5/26 440.67
EFRE-00397307 Linens and mats 9/6-9/12/26 458.14
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 16 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90263: 898.81
90264 3158 ENER POWER 09/25/2026
73491 Electric Energy Charges for : 7/24/26-8/24/26 SID:7543447613 9,979.00 Total for Check Number 90264: 9,979.00
90265 3163 EXCELLANCE, INC. 09/25/2026
X2924 9/8/26 Inv X2924 - 2027 Freightliner M2-106 Plus Chassis, New A 276,294.32 Total for Check Number 90265: 276,294.32
90266 4072 FAHRNEY FORD SALES 09/25/2026
261430 driver seat repair & spark plug replace- PW #650 1,216.49 Total for Check Number 90266: 1,216.49
90267 5005 FIRESTATS, LLC. 09/25/2026
2026-624 Maintenance & Operations of Data Analysis Tools- Sept 2026 600.00 Total for Check Number 90267: 600.00
90268 3186 FRESNO COUNTY CLERK 09/25/2026
002 Election Services- Kingsburg Measure 4,585.47
002 Election Services- Kingsburg Measure 4,585.47
Total for Check Number 90268: 9,170.94
90269 4932 FRESNO OXYGEN/BARNES WELDING 09/25/2026
0063825702 Pool CO2 Bulk Order 719.66
Total for Check Number 90269: 719.66
90270 5001 G&H DIESEL SERVICE, INC. 09/25/2026
53192 A504- cooling fan sensor wiring repair, full service, BIT insp 1,680.30 53287 A504- A/C cooling syst. line leak repair, hose, clamps, coolant 1,882.36 Total for Check Number 90270: 3,562.66
90271 3211 GRAINGER 09/25/2026
9073602691 Faucet- City Park 104.21
9084335026 Hand Dryer- Dog Park 373.29
Total for Check Number 90271: 477.50
90272 3994 GUARDIAN 09/25/2026
10/1-10/31/26 Monthly Insurance Premium 10/2026- Vol. Life Ins. 1,673.17 10/1-10/31/26 Monthly Insurance Premium 10/2026- Guardian- Dental 7,231.86 10/1-10/31/26 Monthly Insurance Premium 10/2026- Life- Employee 200.26 10/1-10/31/26 Monthly Insurance Premium 10/2026- VSP- Vision 1,060.04 10/1-10/31/26 Monthly Insurance Premium 10/2026- Vol. Ins. Plans 1,637.43 Total for Check Number 90272: 11,802.76
90273 4472 MIGUEL GUZMAN 09/25/2026
Reimb. Valley Uniform- Explorer Shirts 73.77
Reimb. Drinks and Snacks- Explorers 32.58
Total for Check Number 90273: 106.35
90274 3222 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 09/25/2026
32243808 Ambulance Medical Supplies 158.42
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 17 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
61672051 Ambulance Medical Supplies 43.46
61788256 Ambulance Medical Supplies 494.81
61888486 Ambulance Medical Supplies 238.15
61951919 Ambulance Medical Supplies 105.00
61952592 Ambulance Medical Supplies 631.62
61967820 Ambulance Medical Supplies 106.29
Total for Check Number 90274: 1,777.75
90275 3550 HERWALDT MOTORSPORTS 09/25/2026
37506 PD #0918- annual service w/ brake flush & oil change 1,156.44 37606 PD #1414- R1200RT annual service, throttle inspection 780.00 Total for Check Number 90275: 1,936.44
90276 4928 IMAGE TREND, LLC 09/25/2026
PS-INV126806 Image Trend- Agency Level Validation EMS - Annual Fee 500.00 PS-INV126806 Image Trend- Agency Level Validation- Fire- Annual Fee 500.00 PS-INV126806 Modules set up and implementation- One time 1,350.00 PS-INV127760 Elite EMS- SaaS- Annual Fee 7,750.85
PS-INV127760 EMS w/NFIRS Reporting- Annual Fee 2,413.33 PS-INV127760 Continuum Fire Content Package- Annual Fee 980.03 PS-INV127760 Continuum- Annual Fee 2,940.10
PS-INV127760 CAD Distribution- Annual Fee 4,287.65
PS-INV127760 Continuum EMS Content Package- Annual Fee 980.03 Total for Check Number 90276: 21,701.99
90277 3584 JAM SERVICES, INC. 09/25/2026
206522 hand hole covers- signals 392.31
Total for Check Number 90277: 392.31
90278 3860 JAS PACIFIC 09/25/2026
BI 15558 Building Inspector 8/1/26-8/31/26 3,660.00
PC3389 Plan Check 8/1/26-8/31/26 2,612.50
Total for Check Number 90278: 6,272.50
90279 4830 JC LAND MANAGEMENT INC 09/25/2026
4020 Ladscape Services- Aug 2026 6,572.20
Total for Check Number 90279: 6,572.20
90280 3249 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC09/25/2026
Oct 2026 Med. Ins. Premium- Oct 2026 2,626.98
Total for Check Number 90280: 2,626.98
90281 3887 KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCC. MED CTR., INC. 09/25/2026 362129 Police Dept. Pre Employment Physical- Nathan Maddox 582.15 Total for Check Number 90281: 582.15
90282 3262 JAMES KIRK 09/25/2026
Reimb. Kirk- D3 Reimb. 100.00
Total for Check Number 90282: 100.00
90283 4081 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 09/25/2026
INV1103972 5 gal pails of Fire Brake Class A Foam 2,345.91 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 18 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90283: 2,345.91
90284 5200 EDGAR MALDONADO 09/25/2026
10/9/26 Per Diem- Building Searches for Patrol Course 23.00 Total for Check Number 90284: 23.00
90285 3293 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL 09/25/2026
August 2026 Disposal Conttract: Aug 2026 Franchise Fees 13,144.92 August 2026 Disposal Conttract: Aug 2026 Comm- less FF's (9910.89) 56,161.69 August 2026 Disposal Conttract: Aug 2026 Franchise Fees -13,144.92 August 2026 Disposal Conttract: Aug 2026 Residential 116,075.82 August 2026 Disposal Conttract: Aug 2026 Multi 2-4 & 5+ -less (3234.03) 18,326.16 Total for Check Number 90285: 190,563.67
90286 3466 NAPA AUTO PARTS 09/25/2026
749386 PW/Streets #607E- connectors, incn pdstlmnt rd ambr 32.67 749396 PW/Streets #607E- magnt tow lights 67.55
749882 PW/Streets #607E- rubber gloves, oil mix 43.84
749999 PW/Streets #397- 5W20 synthetic oil 25.04
Total for Check Number 90286: 169.10
90287 4194 NELSON'S ACE HARDWARE-KINGSBURG09/25/2026
177666 PW/Streets- hedge trimmer cleaner, grabber tool 40.44 177864 PW/Water- gas can nospill, 2cyl lowash oil 31.22 178006 PD Lights- FH PHL MS Z 6-32x1/2 & 3/4, ballast bypass led 109.80 178025 PW/Parks- Hose Nozzle 9.36
178251 PW/Streets- Key Master M1 4.87
178357 PW/Parks- Drill Brush Set 3pc, Flap Disc 4 1/2" 61.46 178378 PW/Parks- prof spray bottle, ss clnr/polish, flap disc 4 1/2" 38.62 178382 PW/Parks- flap disc 4 1/2" 11.70
178405 PW/Water leak- shop towels, j bends, PTFE tape, 10q bucket 75.90 178424 PW/Water leak- j bends,p-trap,45d elbow,sink trap,waste outlet 210.63 Total for Check Number 90287: 594.00
90288 3315 P G & E 09/25/2026
7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 472.31 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 155.04 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 550.80 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 1,028.99 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 68.78 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 4,452.89 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 37,004.42 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 741.57 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 1,960.08 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 245.80 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 10.51 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 2,299.38 7/24/26-8/24/26 Electricity 7/24/26-8/24/26 Acct #7543447781-8 4,637.87 8/13/26-9/13/26 Electricity 8/13/26-9/13/26 Acct #5421414331-2 230.14 8/13-9/13/26 Electricity 8/13/26-9/13/26 Acct #2881582117-9 931.44 8/14/26-9/14/26 Electricity 8/14/26-9/14/26 Acct #7502184272-1 4,471.39 8/14/26-9/14/26 Electricity 8/14/26-9/14/26 Acct #7502184272-1 4,471.39 8/14-9/14/26 Electricity 8/14/26-9/14/26 Acct #2493668675-7 28.23 8/14-9/14/26 Electricity 8/14/26-9/14/26 Acct #2493668675-7 28.23 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 19 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 90288: 63,789.26
90289 4669 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC 09/25/2026
090426 Purchase Power- Aug 2026 205.00
Total for Check Number 90289: 205.00
90290 4715 PRICKETTS DISTRIBUTING, INC. 09/25/2026
421701 Service on ice machine 341.00
Total for Check Number 90290: 341.00
90291 3337 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 09/25/2026
134639 Well #10 TCP Treatment 8/1-8/31/26 per contract 8,906.10 Total for Check Number 90291: 8,906.10
90292 3341 QUINN COMPANY 09/25/2026
WON50037946 Well #13- Gen 356.15
WON50037963 1600 DRaper- Gen- Troubleshoot 576.03
Total for Check Number 90292: 932.18
90293 3363 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS 09/25/2026
520260629084305 Senior Lunch Supplies/Food 30.82
Total for Check Number 90293: 30.82
90294 3961 SHARP AMBULANCE BILLING 09/25/2026
53988 Ambulance Billing Service- Aug 2026 6,232.09
Total for Check Number 90294: 6,232.09
90295 3369 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC. 09/25/2026
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 289.21
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 160.40
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 758.80
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 46.94
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 89.43
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 46.94
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 129.48
207098CT PW & CH Gas Card Charges 9/1-9/15/26 472.92
207099CT ME Fuels (Salinas,Forlines,Ruiz,Chavez,Bustillos,Gomez) 1,563.00 207099CT SRO KES Fuels (Jimenez) 168.12
207099CT ACT Fuels (Castellanos) 563.37
207099CT SRO KHS Fuels (Moon) 98.80
207099CT GF Fuels 2,039.22
207100CT Fuel- Measure E 9/1-9/15/26 1,706.50
207100CT Fuel- Fire 9/1-9/15/26 1,706.50
207100CT Fuel- Ambulance 9/1-9/15/26 1,706.51
Total for Check Number 90295: 11,546.14
90296 4262 SILVERFOX ELECTRIC, INC. 09/25/2026
4251 Pool Ectrical Work/Repair 1,299.61
Total for Check Number 90296: 1,299.61
90297 3380 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-D O J 09/25/2026
064903 Cert of Elig.- App x1 22.00
064903 Fingerprints (Alyssa Vides- CH intern) x1 32.00
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 20 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
064903 Fed Lvl Volteer- Billed x7 105.00
064903 Fingerprint- FBI x7 119.00
064903 Fingerprint Apps x9 288.00
071400 Fed Lvl Volteer- Billed x1 15.00
071400 Fingerprint Apps x9 288.00
071400 Fingerprint- FBI x3 51.00
Total for Check Number 90297: 920.00
90298 4028 SUPERIOR POOL CARE 09/25/2026
5317 Well #15 Chlorine 235 gal 9/10/26 964.22
5319 Well #16 Chlorine 210 gal 9/10/26 861.64
5321 Pool Chlorine Delivery 9/15/26 1,716.29
Total for Check Number 90298: 3,542.15
90299 3397 THE GAS COMPANY 09/25/2026
8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 114.19 8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 82.63 8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 118.41 8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 149.97 8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 455.12 8/11/26-9/10/26 Gas for city dates: 8/11/26-9/10/26 17.38 Total for Check Number 90299: 937.70
90300 5228 TIM'S HEATING & A.C. 09/25/2026
642957 FD Stn #2 HVAC coil replacement 9/11/26 3,290.00 Total for Check Number 90300: 3,290.00
90301 4788 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC. 09/25/2026
25618 Consulting Services for the month of July 2026 6,000.00 Total for Check Number 90301: 6,000.00
90302 3416 VERIZONWIRELESS 09/25/2026
6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 72.46 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 81.99 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 20.77 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 90.18 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 90.82 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 114.08 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 37.56 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 52.17 6153515585 Cellular Svc 8/16/26-9/15/26 Acct 5180355707-00003 14.61 6153515586 Wireless Bill for Fire/Ambulance Aug 16- Sept 15,2026 675.72 Total for Check Number 90302: 1,250.36
90303 3493 VILLAGE TIRE SALES INC 09/25/2026
39210 PW #607E- 2 tires, mount, & disposal fee 223.26
39260 PD #2216- front brakes 78.83
Total for Check Number 90303: 302.09
90304 4441 VULCAN MATERIALS CO. WESTERN DIVISION 09/25/2026 7451640 Fill Sand 10 Tons 9/10/26 253.80
Total for Check Number 90304: 253.80
90305 3448 CHRISTINA WINDOVER 09/25/2026
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 21 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Reimb. Consortium: Live Stream Recording Event Registration Payment 100.00 Total for Check Number 90305: 100.00
Total for 9/25/2026: 988,531.04
Report Total (145 checks): 1,398,998.87
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (10/1/2026 3:59 PM) Page 22

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Staci Smith & City Council
REPORT FROM: Shaun Stephens, Chief of Police REVIEWED BY:

AGENDA ITEM: Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control - Alcohol Policing Partnership Grant ACTION REQUESTED: Ordinance X Resolution Motion_____ Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In March 2026, city applied for an alcohol policing partnership grant through the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Per the grant agreement: "Contractor agrees to implement the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), Alcohol Policing Partnership program. This program is intended to work with law enforcement agencies to develop an effective, comprehensive and strategic approach to eliminate the crime and public nuisance problems associated with problem alcoholic beverage outlets." The grant agreement outlines several enforcement and education activities to be performed by the Kingsburg Police Department, specifically: "Contractor agrees to implement ABC's Minor Decoy, Shoulder Tap Programs and conduct Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies (IMPACT) Inspections. These programs target both ABC licensed premises and individuals who furnish alcoholic beverages to the underage operators. The project is targeted to reduce underage drinking and the resultant DUI driving injuries and fatalities, and/or property damages, reduce youth access to alcoholic beverages through the education of licensee(s), enforcement intervention and the impressions of omnipresence of law enforcement."
Grant Details
The city’s original grant application is included for your review. Highlights of the request include:
• Overtime for officers and sergeants to perform retail compliance checks and decoy operations. • Operating Expenses
• Travel Expenses for out of area training for the grant. • Administrative Costs (HR, Payroll, ect.)
The total grant award is $17,824.00 for one year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-043 confirming the acceptance of the ABC Alcohol Policing Partnership grant in the amount of $17,824.00 and directing staff to execute the grant agreement (Agreement Number 26-APP14).

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)
Council could choose not to accept the grant as awarded by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and not adopt the proposed resolution.

STRATEGIC GOAL(S) MET:

1. Financial Stability

2. Community Safety
Meeting Date:

Agenda Item:
10/07/2026
4 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
None.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The city applied for an alcohol policing partnership grant through the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Per the grant agreement, the program is intended "to work with law enforcement agencies to develop an effective, comprehensive and strategic approach to eliminate the crime and public nuisance problems associated with problem alcoholic beverage outlets."
ABC Grant Requirements
Goal 1 - Conduct Minor Decoy and Shoulder Tap operations Goal 2 - Conduct IMPACT inspections and General Enforcement operations Goal 3 - Provide TRACE and LEAD trainings and press/social media releases

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. Resolution 2026-043

2. Grant Agreement Number 26-APP14

3. Approved Grant Budget Detail
FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There a Fiscal Impact? Yes

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? No

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-043

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF KINGSBURG TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,824.00 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ALCOHOL POLICING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM;

AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KINGSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; AND AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027

ANNUAL BUDGET
WHEREAS, The City of Kingsburg (City) is interested in participating in the Alcohol Policing Partnership Program, which is made available through the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to support local efforts to eliminate the crime and public nuisance problems associated with problem alcoholic beverage outlets in the City; and
WHEREAS, Following the City's submittal of a proposal for the Program, the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control offered to award the City of Kingsburg for the grant program under Agreement Number 26-APP14 beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, Grant funds will be used to conduct Minor Decoy operations, Shoulder Tap operations, Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies (IMPACT) inspections, and General Enforcement operations and administrative costs, and
WHEREAS, In order to be considered eligible to receive grant funding, the City must submit Grant Award Contract to the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KINGSBURG AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Manager or a designated representative is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to accept grant funding in the amount of $17,824.00 from the State of California ABC.

2. The City Manager or a designated representative is hereby authorized, on behalf of the city to execute the grant documents between the City and the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control not to exceed $17,824.00.

3. The City Manager or a designated representative is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute the grant documents and to submit all documents including, without limitation, contracts, amendments, extensions, and payment requests as appropriate to accept the funds under and comply with the conditions of the grant.

4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to establish all required accounts and make any and all expenditures, appropriations, transfers, and/or distributions of funds on behalf of the City as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

5. Grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant ongoing law enforcement expenditures.
***********
I, Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk of the City of Kingsburg, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution 2026-043 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Kingsburg City Council held on the 7th of October, 2026 by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers:

Noes: Councilmembers:

Absent: Councilmembers:

Abstain: Councilmembers:
_________________________________________
Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk
City of Kingsburg

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 1 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK
I. SCOPE OF WORK
• Contractor agrees to implement the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), Alcohol Policing Partnership program. This program is intended to work with law enforcement agencies to develop an effective, comprehensive and strategic approach to eliminate the crime and public nuisance problems associated with problem alcoholic beverage outlets. • Contractor agrees to implement ABC’s Minor Decoy, Shoulder Tap Programs and conduct Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies (IMPACT) Inspections.

These programs target both ABC licensed premises and individuals who furnish alcoholic beverages to the underage operators. The project is targeted to reduce underage drinking and the resultant DUI driving injuries and fatalities, and/or property damages, reduce youth access to alcoholic beverages through the education of licensee(s), enforcement intervention and the impressions of omnipresence of law enforcement. In addition, Contractor agrees to the following goals:

1. The operation period of the grant is July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.

2. Contractor agrees to raise public awareness that selling, serving and/or furnishing alcoholic beverages to individuals under twenty-one years old is a criminal violation that will be prosecuted by local city and district attorneys.

3. Minor Decoy operations are designed to educate and deter licensed locations from selling/furnishing alcohol to minors. Contractor agrees to conduct Minor Decoy Operations at both “On-Sale” and “Off-Sale” licensed establishments within the operation period of the grant.

4. Shoulder Tap operations are used to detect and deter adult furnishers outside of a licensed business. Contractor agrees to conduct Shoulder Tap Operations at “Off-Sale” licensed locations to apprehend adults that are unaffiliated with the licensed businesses and who are purchasing alcohol for minors outside of the stores within the operation period of the grant.

5. Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies (IMPACT) primary goal is to educate licensees on alcohol related laws to help reduce alcohol-related crime in and around licensed premises. Contractor agrees to conduct visits and inspections of licensed premises identifying areas of non-compliance at “On-Sale” and “Off-Sale” licensed locations within the operation period of the grant.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 2 of 3 ends

II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

1. Conduct at least two(2) Minor Decoy operations.

2. Conduct at least two (2) Shoulder tap operations, including the Statewide Shoulder tap operation.

3. Conduct at least two (2) IMPACT operations.

4. Conduct at least two (2) General Enforcement operations.

5. Provide one (1) Roll call/TRACE training.

6. Schedule and coordinate at least one (1) LEAD training.

7. Provide press/social media releases on grant enforcement activities.

A. To announce the start of the program;
B. At the conclusion of each Minor Decoy Operation has been held (to announce the number of licensed premises who sold to the minor decoy) C. At the conclusion of each Shoulder Tap Operation has been held (to announce the number of adults arrested for purchasing alcoholic beverages for the decoy).

8. Contractor will fax (916) 419-2599 or email each press release to the Department’s Public Information Officer ([email protected]) as soon as it is released.

9. Contractor agrees in all press releases, in addition to any credits the agency wishes to give, will include the following statement: “This project is part of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control’s Alcohol Policing Partnership.”
Contractor agrees to complete and submit monthly reports on a format designed and provided by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control due no later than 15th of the following month.

III. PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES
The project representatives during the term of this agreement will be:

Kingsburg Police Department
Brent Kroeger, Sergeant
1300 California Street
Kingsburg, CA 93631
(559) 897-4418
[email protected]
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Jennifer Delarosa, Supervising Agent in Charge
3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95834
[email protected]
Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 3 of 3 ends

Direct all fiscal inquiries to:

Kingsburg Police Department
Jennifer Alvarez, Account Clerk II
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA 93631
(559) 897-5821
[email protected]
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Kristine Okino, Grant Coordinator
3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95834
(916) 312-4349
[email protected]
Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 1 of 3 ends

EXHIBIT B

BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS
I. INVOICING AND PAYMENT
• For services satisfactorily rendered and upon receipt and approval of the invoice, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control agrees to pay a monthly payment of approved reimbursable costs per the Budget Detail of personnel overtime and benefits (actual cost) and/or allowable costs.
• Invoices shall clearly reference this contract number (26-APP14) and must not exceed the contract total authorized amount of $17,824.00. Invoices are to be submitted by the 15th of every month, on the prescribed form designed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

Submit to: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Attn: Kristine Okino, Grant Coordinator
3927 Lennane Drive
Sacramento, California 95834
• Payment shall be made in arrears within 30 days from the receipt of an undisputed invoice.

Nothing contained herein shall prohibit advance payments as authorized by Item 2100-101- 3036, Budget Act, Statues of 2026.
• Contractor understands in order to be eligible for reimbursement; cost must be incurred on or after the effective date of the project, July 1, 2026 and on or before the project termination date, June 30, 2027.
• Revisions to the “Scope of Work” and the “Budget Detail” may be requested by a change request letter submitted by the Contractor. If approved, the revised Grant Scope of Work and/or Budget Detail supersedes and replaces the previous grant and will initiate an amendment. No revisions can exceed allotted amount as shown on the Budget Detail. The total amount of the grant must remain unchanged.
• Contractor agrees to refund to the State any amounts claimed for reimbursement and paid to Contractor which are later disallowed by the State after audit or inspection of records maintained by the Contractor.
• Only the costs displayed in the Budget Detail are authorized for reimbursement by the State to Contractor under this agreement. Any other costs incurred by Contractor in the performance of this agreement are the sole responsibility of Contractor. • Prior approval by the State in writing is required for the location, costs, dates, agenda, instructors, instructional materials, and attendees at any reimbursable training seminar, workshop or conference, and over any reimbursable publicity or educational materials to be made available for distribution. Contractors are required to acknowledge the support of the State whenever publicizing the work under this grant in any media.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 2 of 3 ends

II. BUDGET DETAIL

COST CATEGORY TOTAL COST
A. Personnel Services
Overtime
Officer $7,394.00
Sergeant/Supervisor $4,633.00
Benefits – 7.65% $3,007.00
TOTAL Personnel $15,034.00
B. Operating Expenses (receipts required)
Buy Funds $140.00
TOTAL Operating $140.00
C. Equipment (receipts required, must be purchased by 12/31) n/a $0.00
TOTAL Equipment $0.00
D. Travel Costs
Registration, hotel and per diem $2,650.00
TOTAL Travel $2,650.00
GRANT TOTAL $17,824.00
Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 3 of 3 ends

III. BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
• It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current year and/or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect. In this event, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Contractor or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Contractor shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement.

• If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act for purposes of this program, the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the State, or offer an agreement amendment to Contractor to reflect the reduced amount.

IV. PROMPT PAYMENT CLAUSE
• Payment will be made in accordance with, and within the time specified in, Government Code Chapter 4.5, commencing with Section 927.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 1 of 5 ends

General Terms and Conditions (GTC 02/2025)

EXHIBIT C

1. APPROVAL: This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties and approved by the Department of General Services, if required. Contractor may not commence performance until such approval has been obtained.

2. AMENDMENT: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or Agreement not incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the parties.

3. ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement is not assignable by the Contractor, either in whole or in part, without the consent of the State in the form of a formal written amendment.

4. AUDIT: Contractor agrees that the awarding department, the Department of General Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. Contractor agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Contractor agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement. (Gov. Code §8546.7, Pub. Contract Code §10115 et seq., CCR Title 2, Section 1896).

5. INDEMNIFICATION: Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement.

6. DISPUTES: Contractor shall continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute.

7. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The State may terminate this Agreement and be relieved of any payments should the Contractor fail to perform the requirements of this Agreement at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. All costs to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Agreement and the balance, if any, shall be aid to the Contractor upon demand.

8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the State.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 2 of 5 ends

9. RECYCLING CERTIFICATION: The Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post-consumer material as defined in the Public Contract Code Section 12200, in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold to the State regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 12209. With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall specify that the cartridges so comply (Pub. Contract Code §12205).

10. NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE: During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall not deny the contract’s benefits to any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Contractor shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. Contractor and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12900 et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Gov. Code §§11135-11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the awarding state agency to implement such article. Contractor shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the awarding state agency upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours’ notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or Agency shall require to ascertain compliance with this clause. Contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11105.) Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement.

11. CERTIFICATION CLAUSES: The CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION CLAUSES contained in the document CCC 04/2017 are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement by this reference as if attached hereto.

12. TIMELINESS: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

13. COMPENSATION: The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractor's expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel, per diem, and taxes, unless otherwise expressly so provided.

14. GOVERNING LAW: This contract is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. ANTITRUST CLAIMS: The Contractor by signing this agreement hereby certifies that if these services or goods are obtained by means of a competitive bid, the Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Government Codes Sections set out below.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 3 of 5 ends

a. The Government Code Chapter on Antitrust claims contains the following definitions:
1) "Public purchase" means purchase by means of competitive bids of goods, services, or materials by the State or any of its political subdivisions or public agencies on whose behalf the Attorney General may bring an action pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 16750 of the Business and Professions Code.
2) "Public purchasing body" means the State or the subdivision or agency making a public purchase. Government Code Section 4550.
b. In submitting a bid to a public purchasing body, the bidder offers and agrees that if the bid is accepted, it will assign to the purchasing body all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.

Sec.15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code),arising from purchases of goods, materials, or services by the bidder for sale to the purchasing body pursuant to the bid. Such assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the purchasing body tenders final payment to the bidder. Government Code Section4552.
c. If an awarding body or public purchasing body receives, either through judgment or settlement, a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter, the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred and may, upon demand, recover from the public body any portion of the recovery, including treble damages, attributable to overcharges that were paid by the assign or but were not paid by the public body as part of the bid price, less the expenses incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery. Government Code Section4553. d. Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year from such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned under this part if the assign or has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of action arose and (a)the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (b) the assignee declines to file a court action for the cause of action. See Government Code Section4554.

16. CHILD SUPPORT COMPLIANCE ACT: For any Agreement in excess of $100,000, the contractor acknowledges in accordance with Public Contract Code 7110, that:
a. The contractor recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all applicable state and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code; and b. The contractor, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the California Employment Development Department.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 4 of 5 ends

17. UNENFORCEABLE PROVISION: In the event that any provision of this Agreement is unenforceable or held to be unenforceable, then the parties agree that all other provisions of this Agreement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby.

18. PRIORITY HIRING CONSIDERATIONS: If this Contract includes services in excess of $200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 11200 in accordance with Pub. Contract Code §10353.

19. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND DVBE PARTICIPATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:
a. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve small business participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) report to the awarding department the actual percentage of small business participation that was achieved. (Govt. Code § 14841.) b. If for this Contract Contractor made a commitment to achieve disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) certify in a report to the awarding department: (1) the total amount the prime Contractor received under the Contract; (2) the name and address of the DVBE(s) that participated in the performance of the Contract; (3) the amount each DVBE received from the prime Contractor; (4) that all payments under the Contract have been made to the DVBE; and (5) the actual percentage of DVBE participation that was achieved. A person or entity that knowingly provides false information shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation. (Mil. & Vets. Code § 999.5(d); Govt. Code § 14841.)

20. LOSS LEADER: If this contract involves the furnishing of equipment, materials, or supplies then the following statement is incorporated: It is unlawful for any person engaged in business within this state to sell or use any article or product as a “loss leader” as defined in Section 17030 of the Business and Professions Code. (PCC 10344(e).)

21. GENERATIVE AI DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS:
a. The following terms are in addition to the defined terms and shall apply to the Contract:
1) “Generative AI (GenAI)” means an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system's training data. (Gov. Code § 11549.64.)
b. Contractor shall immediately notify the State in writing if it: (1) intends to provide GenAI as a deliverable to the State; or (2), intends to utilize GenAI, including GenAI from third parties, to complete all or a portion of any deliverable that materially impacts: (i) functionality of a State system, (ii) risk to the State, or (iii) Contract performance. For avoidance of doubt, the term “materially impacts” shall have the meaning set forth in State Administrative Manual (SAM) § 4986.2 Definitions for GenAI.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 5 of 5 ends

c. Notification shall be provided to the State designee identified in this Contract. d. At the direction of the State, Contractor shall discontinue the provision to the State of any previously unreported GenAI that results in a material impact to the functionality of the System, risk to the State, or Contract performance, as determined by the State. e. If the use of previously undisclosed GenAI is approved by the State, then Contractor will update the Deliverable description, and the Parties will amend the Contract accordingly, which may include incorporating the GenAI Special Provisions into the Contract, at no additional cost to the State.
f. The State, at its sole discretion, may consider Contractor’s failure to disclose or discontinue the provision or use of GenAI as described above, to constitute a material breach of Contract when such failure results in a material impact to the functionality of the System, risk to the State, or Contract performance. The State is entitled to seek any and all remedies available to it under law as a result of such breach, including but not limited to termination of the contract.

Agreement Number: 26-APP14
City of Kingsburg through the Kingsburg Police Department

Page 1 of 1 ends

EXHIBIT D

SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Disputes: Any disputes concerning a question of fact arising under this contract which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, or designee, who shall reduce his decision in writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the Contractor. The decision of the Department shall be final and conclusive unless, within 30 days from the date of receipt of such copy, the Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes to the State a written appeal addressed to the Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The decision of the Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control or his duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. In connection with any appeal proceeding under this clause, the contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its appeal. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the contract and in accordance with the decision of the State.

2. Cancellation/Termination: This agreement may be cancelled or terminated without cause by either party by giving thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice to the other party. Such notification shall state the effective date of termination or cancellation and include any final performance and/or payment/invoicing instructions/requirements. No penalty shall accrue to either party because of contract termination.

3. Contract Validity: This contract is valid and enforceable only if adequate funds are appropriated in Item 2100-101-3036, Budget Act of 2026, for the purposes of this program.

4. Contractor Certifications: By signing this agreement, Contractor certifies compliance with the provisions of CCC 04/2017, Standard Contractor Certification Clauses. This document may be viewed at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources/Page-Content/Office-ofLegal-Services-Resources-List-Folder/Standard-Contract-Language

5. If the State determines that the grant project is not achieving its goals and objectives on schedule, funding may be reduced by the State to reflect this lower level of project activity and/or cancel the agreement.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Smith & City Council
REPORT FROM: Daniel Galvez – Public Works Director REVIEWED BY: AJH AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2026-044 allowing City staff to apply for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Zero- Emission Landscape Equipment Voucher Program
ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ____Motion ____Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) offers the Zero-Emission Landscape Equipment (ZELE) Voucher Program to assist eligible public agencies and other qualifying entities with the purchase of zeroemission landscaping equipment.

The City of Kingsburg Public Works Department is seeking to utilize this program to purchase a zero-emission rideon mower and additional electric landscape maintenance equipment. The proposed equipment will support the City's ongoing parks and landscape maintenance operations while reducing emissions and maintenance associated with traditional gasoline-powered equipment. The City intends to apply for available voucher funding to offset the purchase costs. Final equipment selections and purchase amounts will be subject to program requirements, funding availability. The grant allows for a reimbursement of up to $15,000 for a ride on mower a typical gas mower would cost about $20,000 with the grant funds the cost of mower will be approximately $6,500. Leaf blowers are reimbursed at $1400 and edgers, string trimmers, chainsaws and poles saws are reimbursed at $700 each.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL

1. Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution 2026-044 authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute the grant application for the Zero Emission Landscaping Equipment Voucher Program and authorize the purchase of the equipment of landscape equipment.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Council could choose not to authorize the grant application and direct staff to find alternative funding sources for the purchase of landscaping equipment.

STRATEGIC GOAL(S) MET:

1. Financial Stability

2. Community Safety
Meeting Date: 10/07/2026
Agenda Item: 5

Page 2 of 2 ends

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW
Council approved the purchase of the mower and equipment as part of the 2026-2027 fiscal year budget, utilizing SJVAPCD grant fund to offset the final purchase price.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In 2024, CA AB1346 banned the sale of new gasoline powered small off-road engines under 25 horsepower including leaf blowers, timers, chainsaws and mowers as of January 1, 2024.

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. Resolution 2026-044

2. Estimate for Mower

3. SJVAPCD Zero-Emission Landscape Equipment (ZELE) Voucher Program application FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? Yes

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? 001-4200-549-5701
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-044
Electric Mowers Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment Voucher Program WHERAS, the City of Kingsburg wishes to apply for a Public Benefit Grant Program to obtain funds from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District ( Air District) to purchase zero emission landscaping equipment; and WHEREAS, the Air District can award grants up to $15,000 for ride on/stand-ride mowers, up to $700 for each edger, string trimmer, hedge trimmer, chainsaw, pole saws and up to $1,400 for each leaf blower; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to sign the grant application for the Zero Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) voucher program on behalf of the City, and execute a grant agreement and other grant-related documents and implement the project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Staff is authorized to prepare and submit to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District an application for the Zero -Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) voucher program. ******
I, Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk of the City of Kingsburg, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Kingsburg City Council held on the 7th day of October 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers:

Noes: Councilmembers:

Absent: Councilmembers:

Abstain: Councilmembers:

Abigail Palsgaard, City Clerk
City of Kingsburg
1 CP: ELIAN

Q U O T A T I O N
DATE:

CUSTOMER #:

P.O.#:
20805
TERMS: Net 30
California Turf Equipment & Supply Inc. 8/23/2026
956 N J STREET
TULARE, CA 93274 USA
Phone #: (559)688-2505
Fax #: (559)688-0861
PHONE #:

ALT. #:
(559)419-0066
LOCATION: 1
STATUS: Active
PAGE:

ORDER #: 415911
SALES TYPE: Quote
CELL #:

CITY OF KINGSBURG
1401 Draper Street
KINGSBURG, CA 93631 US

CITY OF KINGSBURG
1401 Draper Street
KINGSBURG, CA 93631 US
BILL TO 20805 SHIP TO

MFR PRODUCT NUMBER DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE NET TOTAL
GREECZ60R24X $26,999.99 $19,499.99 $19,499.99 CZ60R24X-G5 GWC OPT 82V 60" ZTR RO 1 24kWh CZ60R24X
GREE7510702 $299.99 $299.99 $299.99 Mulch Baffles Kit Accessory for 82ZTC152 1 SOURCEWELL CONTRACT NUMBER: 112624-GNW
This quote is valid for 30 days. Please contact your sales representative to confirm availability prior to acceptance. Prices are subject to change after the validity period.

ORDER TOTAL: $21,578.02
TAX: $1,778.04
SUBTOTAL: $19,799.98
Authorized By:

ZELE Voucher Program | August 2026
www.valleyair.org/ZELE

VOUCHER PROGRAM APPLICATION
Please fill out this form completely and as accurately as possible. To be eligible for a voucher, do not purchase your new equipment before receiving a voucher from the District. If replacing more than one piece of equipment, please submit a single page one (1) and two (2) and a separate page three (3) for each individual piece of equipment to be replaced.

Page 1 of 3 ends

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Select Applicant Type Application # Date Received
Business Entity: Landscape business providing service to homes and/or businesses, or a business performing commercial scale in-house landscape maintenance
Are you a small business? (see guidelines for definition) Yes No Public Agency: Performs commercial scale in-house landscape maintenance Please describe landscape tasks performed and type of location where performed (i.e. Landscape maintenance for homes):

Organization Name (as it appears on IRS Form W-9)
County of where operation is located (check all that apply) San Joaquin Stanislaus Merced Madera Fresno Kings Tulare Kern (Valley portion) Physical Address of Organization City State Zip Code
Mailing Address of Organization (as it appears on IRS Form W-9) City State Zip Code Primary Contact Name Title
E-mail (optional) Check here if you prefer your voucher emailed Primary Phone Alternate Phone Signing Authority Name (if different from above) Title
Signing authority must be a duly authorized official within the business entity or public agency, and has the authority to make financial decisions and guarantees on behalf of the business/agency (i.e., President, Chief Financial Officer, Mayor, City Manager, Superintendent, etc.).

CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I certify that I am a duly authorized official of the organization identified on this application and have the authority to submit a program application, implement the project, and make guarantees on behalf of the organization to complete the project in accordance to the program guidelines. In addition, I certify that I have read, understand and will adhere to the Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) Voucher Program guidelines and agree to adhere to all of the following:
• The information provided in the application and supporting documents is true and correct and meets the minimum requirements of the ZELE Program.
• I understand that an incomplete or illegible application may be immediately rejected, and I will be notified. • I am an individual that resides within the District boundaries or a business or public agency whose principal place of business is physically located within the District boundaries.
• I have not purchased the new equipment that I am seeking funding for prior to applying to this program. I understand I must receive an approved program voucher from the District prior to purchasing the new equipment, or my project may be deemed ineligible. (Applicants are encouraged to wait to dispose of any old equipment until receiving an approved voucher) • I have owned and operated the equipment listed under the Old Equipment section of this application, 100% within the District boundaries for the two years prior to submitting this application.

ZELE Voucher Program | August 2026
www.valleyair.org/ZELE

Page 2 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATION (continued)
• The old gas- or diesel-powered equipment that is being replaced as part of this application is in operable condition, is able to start and move, and has all operational parts intact.
• The new, cordless zero-emission electric equipment I will purchase under this project will be owned and operated 100% within the boundaries of the District for a minimum of 36 months from the date of purchase and is not being acquired for resale. • I agree to surrender the equipment listed under the Old Equipment section of this application to a participating dismantler within 60 days of receiving my new equipment and submit a Claim for Payment Packet to the District for the new equipment purchased within 75 days of receiving my new equipment. I understand that failure to do so may result in my claim for payment being deemed ineligible.
• I understand the submission of this application does not guarantee incentive funding for the new equipment. Eligibility of the application is determined at the sole discretion of the District. Applications not meeting the intent and/or eligibility of the program will be deemed ineligible.
• I understand as an applicant that incentive programs have limited funds and shall terminate upon depletion of program funding. Unless written notification is provided stating otherwise, all applications submitted to the District will remain active and will be funded in the order received.
• I have disclosed all additional co-funding sources and discounts that will be applied to my purchase. • If I do not or cannot meet all program requirements as determined by the District, I shall repay the District a pro-rated portion, up to the full amount of my voucher.
• If applying as a small business, my signature means I fully meet the definition of a small business and I agree to provide the following information, if requested, to verify my small business status: total revenue, receipts, and sales reported to the Internal Revenue Service in your most recent filing. This information may be reported in Box 1c of IRS Form 1120, Box 1c of IRS Form 1065, or Box 3 of IRS Schedule C (Form 1040).
• The District is not in partnership with nor endorses any manufacturers or dealers. Any issues arising from the purchase of the new equipment is between applicant and the manufacturer or dealer. The District will not be held liable for any circumstances that occur between the applicant and the manufacturer or dealer.

Signature of Signing Authority Date

CHECKLIST
Please submit the following items on this checklist for the application to be deemed complete for funding consideration.

Completed application
First page of IRS Form W-9: The name identified on the W-9 must match the organization name on this application.

Business Entities Only: Verification that the business is currently in operation. Acceptable documentation includes, but is not limited to, one of the following:
» Copy of a valid business license, covering the past 24 months from the date of application submittal; or » C-27-Landscape Contractors License Number; or
» Identification number assigned to a business entity by the California Secretary of State at the time of registration » The District maintains the discretion to accept or request other documentation to demonstrate applicant is a commercial landscape maintenance provider and meets the intent of the program.

VOUCHER PROGRAM APPLICATION

STEPS & SUBMIT
PROGRAM PROCESS When complete, please submit via:

STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
STEP 5
- Submit a complete application
- Receive a Voucher from the District
- Purchase your new equipment and destroy your old
equipment
- Submit a Claim for Payment Packet
- Own and operate your new equipment for 36 months
MAIL
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Attention: ZELE Program Staff
1990 East Gettysburg Ave., Fresno, CA 93726-0244
E-MAIL:
[email protected]
FAX
(559) 230-6112
OR APPLY ONLINE AT www.valleyair.org/ZELE
ZELE Voucher Program | August 2026
www.valleyair.org/ZELE

Page 3 of 3 ends

VOUCHER PROGRAM APPLICATION
Please submit a separate page three (3) for each individual piece of equipment to be replaced. OLD EQUIPMENT Type of Equipment to be Disposed of (CHECK ONLY ONE OPTION) Edger Chainsaw Leaf Blower Walk-behind Mower Stand-on Mower Brushcutter String Trimmer Hedge Trimmer Pole saw Leaf Vacuum Ride-on Mower Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Equipment Specifics (if known)
Make Model No. Model Year EPA Engine Family Name

NEW EQUIPMENT
New electric equipment purchased must be:

1. In the same equipment category as identified in the Equipment Type Categories table. For example, an old gas-powered chainsaw can be replaced with a new electric chainsaw, string trimmer, hedge trimmer, pole saw, edger, or brushcutter.
» Additional batteries and chargers acquired as part of the new equipment purchase may be included as part of the total eligible cost.

See Program Guidelines for more information regarding additional batteries and chargers.

2. Purchased from a manufacturer-authorized retailer or dealer.

3. Battery-powered electric and new, not previously owned or used.

4. Purchased with a power head.
» Attachments without a power head are ineligible, and manual equipment without an engine are not eligible.
» Combo kits with one power head and multiple attachments will be considered as one piece of equipment.

DISCLOSURE
Applicants must disclose if they are receiving or will be applying for additional funding for the purchase of the new equipment in this application. Please choose from one of the following:

Yes, I have applied or will apply for funding from other sources, for the purchase of the new equipment listed in this application. List the Program name, Project/Reference Number, and Funding amount Program Name(s) Project/Reference # Funding Amount(s)
No, I have not applied and will not apply for funding from other sources.

EQUIPMENT TYPE CATEGORIES
Edgers, String Trimmers, Hedge Trimmers,
Chainsaws, Pole Saws, and Brushcutters
Leaf Blowers and Vacuums
Walk-behind Mowers
Ride-on or Stand/Sit Mowers

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Smith & City Council
REPORT FROM: Alma Colado, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: AJH AGENDA ITEM: Treasurer’s Reports
ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution _√_ Motion ____Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attached for the Council’s information is the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarters ended June 30, 2026. Historically, the City invested most of our reserves with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). LAIF is a pooled investment fund established by the state to provide cities with safe investment option that is administered by the State of California Treasure’s Office. Interest rates in LAIF lag behind the current economic trends; earnings or returns are typically lower than other investment channels. At the end of the third quarter, the interest rate for LAIF was at

3.98%.

Currently the cash balances of the City of Kingsburg are invested in Local Area Investment Fund Pool (LAIF) and California CLASS Pool investments.

In the first half of the 2022-23 Fiscal Year, the Council amended the city’s financial policy to allow for investment with California CLASS. CA CLASS is a local government investment pool that provides public agencies with the opportunity to pool their funds together with the goal of collectively earning interest on investments. “The California CLASS philosophy is to provide competitive returns while focusing on safety and liquidity. While CA CLASS operates a similar formula, the short to medium term securities portfolio offers the opportunity to optimize interest earnings, while not sacrificing safety or liquidity of the funds. At the end of the third quarter, the interest rate for CA CLASS was at 3.696%.

The monthly financial summaries attached provide a detailed report of the City’s cash and investments.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL

1. City Council accepts the Treasurer’s Report from April 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. N/A

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC

1. Financial Stability

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
None related to the City budget.

Meeting Date: 10/7/2026
Agenda Item: 6
FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? N/A

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A

Page 2 of 2 ends

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. April – June 2026 Treasurer’s Reports
Pooled Investments Interest Rate
Petty Cash/Change Fund N/A $ 1,050.00
WestAmerica Payroll A/C N/A -
WestAmerica Bank General Operating N/A 1,157,317.62
WestAmerica Finance Authority A/C N/A -
Cal Class Investments 3.692% 1,711,778.16
Local Agency Investment Fund-City 3.920% 20,709,395.24
Total $ 23,579,541.02
Funds
General Fund- $5,803,513.63
Pool -$198,225.76
Senior Center -$443,339.92
CDBG -$9,466.29
Park Improvements -$367,814.25
Transient Oriented Development -$71,238.50
San Joaquin Valley Air Grant $21.00
COPS $116,353.29
Linnaea Villas Public Project $99,544.68
Frontage Road $3,376.33
Heritage Clean Ca Grant -$72,725.00
18th Ave Sidewalks $462.00
10th Ave Reconstruction $71,103.77
18/Kern Lighted Crosswalk -$144,564.62
Bethel Avenue Improvements $10,652.37
Madsen Ave Recon Sierra to Std -$47,492.91
Madsen Av Bike Pth Strd to Kam -$76,309.91
Bethel Sierra Roundabout $2,005.50
Mehlert Ave Reconstruction $200,430.49
12th Ave Sidewalks -$9,112.95
18th Ave Sidewalks -$29,417.76
18th Ave Sidewalks-Sierra-Stroud -$531.00
18th Ave Reconstruction -$9,377.32
20TH21ST Alley Improvements -$304,148.70
Gilroy Mariposa 18th Roundabout -$8,840.00
Fund $752,501.51
LTF 3 $168,574.16
LTF 8 $1,188,411.32
Measure C $582,202.09
Measure E -$87,209.06
Abandoned Vehicle $18,768.22
Act Task Force -$62,224.03
School Resource Officer Grant -$201,274.40
KJUHSD SRO Grant $66,047.98
Elementary SRO Grant $45,473.05
Tri-County-Emtparamedic Grant -$101,526.47
Capital Facilites $6,001,074.37
Sewer $1,907,346.56
Storm Drain $240,170.42
Par & Rec $798,435.71
Traffic Impact $14,955.50
Equipment Reserve $28,143.48
Water $348,017.02
Solid Waste -$45,970.40
Ambulance -$1,982,502.89
Risk Management $358,662.59
CALPERS UAL Fund $1,173,351.82
Economic Stabilization Fund $6,887,588.74
Equipment Reserve Fund $196,903.06
Forgivable Loan Program Fund $310,636.95
Finance Authority -$103,883.97
Landscaping & Lighting $13,691.64
Community Facilities District $837,191.76
Cash Payroll Clearing -$307,474.44
Deposit adjustments $18,600.56
Total $ 23,579,541.02
City of Kingsburg Treasurer's Report
Pooled Cash Investments and Cash
Period Ended April 30, 2026
12,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
17,000,000.00
18,000,000.00
19,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
21,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
23,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
25,000,000.00

MONTHLY POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
FY 25-26
FY 24-25
FY 23-24
FY 22-23
FY 21-22
Pooled Investments Interest Rate
Petty Cash/Change Fund N/A $ 1,050.00
WestAmerica Payroll A/C N/A -
WestAmerica Bank General Operating N/A 670,935.22
WestAmerica Finance Authority A/C N/A -
Cal Class Investments 3.697% 1,717,154.03
Local Agency Investment Fund-City 3.980% 21,109,395.24
Total $ 23,498,534.49
Funds
General Fund- $5,456,553.53
Pool -$189,777.19
Senior Center -$455,596.03
CDBG -$9,466.29
Park Improvements -$375,741.60
Transient Oriented Development -$71,238.50
San Joaquin Valley Air Grant $21.00
COPS $95,896.84
Linnaea Villas Public Project $99,544.68
Frontage Road $3,376.33
Heritage Clean Ca Grant -$72,725.00
18th Ave Sidewalks $462.00
10th Ave Reconstruction $71,103.77
18/Kern Lighted Crosswalk -$144,564.62
Bethel Avenue Improvements $10,652.37
Madsen Ave Recon Sierra to Std -$47,492.91
Madsen Av Bike Pth Strd to Kam -$76,309.91
Bethel Sierra Roundabout $2,005.50
Mehlert Ave Reconstruction $192,147.99
12th Ave Sidewalks -$9,112.95
18th Ave Sidewalks -$29,417.76
18th Ave Sidewalks-Sierra-Stroud -$531.00
18th Ave Reconstruction -$27,877.32
20TH21ST Alley Improvements -$314,611.20
Gilroy Mariposa 18th Roundabout -$17,340.00
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations -$620.00
Various RRFB Enhancements $1,360.00
Fund $786,713.32
LTF 3 $168,625.55
LTF 8 $1,103,718.71
Measure C $561,090.16
Measure E -$53,991.99
Abandoned Vehicle $18,768.22
Act Task Force -$12,790.52
School Resource Officer Grant -$201,274.40
KJUHSD SRO Grant $48,606.96
Elementary SRO Grant $28,864.32
Tri-County-Emtparamedic Grant -$101,526.47
Capital Facilites $6,081,624.14
Sewer $1,915,917.40
Storm Drain $240,243.63
Par & Rec $808,678.14
Traffic Impact $14,960.06
Equipment Reserve $28,143.48
Water $478,322.36
Solid Waste -$29,209.58
Ambulance -$2,090,281.14
Risk Management $468,579.67
CALPERS UAL Fund $1,158,785.16
Economic Stabilization Fund $6,881,588.74
Equipment Reserve Fund $196,903.06
Forgivable Loan Program Fund $310,636.95
Finance Authority -$103,883.97
Landscaping & Lighting $4,668.48
Community Facilities District $928,222.26
Cash Payroll Clearing -$239,976.09
Deposit adjustments $7,106.15
Total $ 23,498,534.49
City of Kingsburg Treasurer's Report
Pooled Cash Investments and Cash
Period Ended May 31, 2026
12,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
17,000,000.00
18,000,000.00
19,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
21,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
23,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
25,000,000.00

MONTHLY POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
FY 25-26
FY 24-25
FY 23-24
FY 22-23
FY 21-22
Pooled Investments Interest Rate
Petty Cash/Change Fund N/A $ 1,050.00
WestAmerica Payroll A/C N/A -
WestAmerica Bank General Operating N/A 911,145.50
WestAmerica Finance Authority A/C N/A -
Cal Class Investments 3.696% 1,722,374.87
Local Agency Investment Fund-City 3.980% 21,509,395.24
Total $ 24,143,965.61
Funds
General Fund- $4,940,223.21
Pool -$189,558.84
Senior Center -$455,812.13
CDBG -$9,466.29
Park Improvements -$3,756.60
Transient Oriented Development -$71,238.50
San Joaquin Valley Air Grant $21.00
COPS $75,425.75
Linnaea Villas Public Project $99,544.68
Frontage Road $3,376.33
Heritage Clean Ca Grant -$72,725.00
18th Ave Sidewalks $462.00
10th Ave Reconstruction $71,103.77
18/Kern Lighted Crosswalk -$144,564.62
Bethel Avenue Improvements $10,652.37
Madsen Ave Recon Sierra to Std -$47,492.91
Madsen Av Bike Pth Strd to Kam -$76,309.91
Bethel Sierra Roundabout $2,005.50
Mehlert Ave Reconstruction $192,147.99
12th Ave Sidewalks -$9,112.95
18th Ave Sidewalks -$29,417.76
18th Ave Sidewalks-Sierra-Stroud -$531.00
18th Ave Reconstruction -$3,310.25
20TH21ST Alley Improvements -$314,611.20
Gilroy Mariposa 18th Roundabout -$3,740.00
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations -$620.00
Various RRFB Enhancements $1,360.00
Fund $832,281.25
LTF 3 $175,772.15
LTF 8 $1,084,056.38
Measure C $514,176.56
Measure E -$88,657.72
Abandoned Vehicle $18,768.22
Act Task Force -$39,233.77
School Resource Officer Grant -$201,274.40
KJUHSD SRO Grant $36,464.38
Elementary SRO Grant $16,105.00
Tri-County-Emtparamedic Grant -$101,526.47
Capital Facilites $6,065,851.53
Sewer $1,919,711.51
Storm Drain $240,290.08
Par & Rec $813,119.33
Traffic Impact $14,962.95
Equipment Reserve $28,143.48
Water $569,285.85
Solid Waste -$11,907.83
Ambulance -$1,783,630.99
Risk Management $578,496.75
CALPERS UAL Fund $1,144,218.50
Economic Stabilization Fund $6,875,588.74
Equipment Reserve Fund $196,903.06
Forgivable Loan Program Fund $320,433.51
RDA Cap Proj Successor Agency $148,262.28
Finance Authority -$103,883.97
Landscaping & Lighting $1,725.75
Community Facilities District $894,102.77
Cash Payroll Clearing $12,579.11
Deposit adjustments $8,726.98
Total $ 24,143,965.61
City of Kingsburg Treasurer's Report
Pooled Cash Investments and Cash
Period Ended June 30, 2026
12,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
17,000,000.00
18,000,000.00
19,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
21,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
23,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
25,000,000.00

MONTHLY POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
FY 25-26
FY 24-25
FY 23-24
FY 22-23
FY 21-22

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Smith & City Council
REPORT FROM: Alexander J. Henderson, City Manager; ICMA-CM REVIEWED BY: MN AGENDA ITEM: Matoian Agreement To Develop Vacant Land; APN 394-042-04 ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ___Motion ____Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2021, the city began discussions with the owner of the 13-acre parcel of land located north of the existing Business Park. The discussions were initiated as the property owner, George Matoian, originally inquired about the ability to annex the parcel into the city, and to pre-zone it for Highway Commercial use. Attachments to this staff report include previous actions taken, which ultimately included the execution of an Agreement to Develop Vacant Land and associated Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, Agreement for Donation of Real Property from the developer to the city, annexation into the city limits, and extension of services including street and utilities to the southern boundary donated 3-acre parcel.

Originally, the donated 3-acre parcel was to be utilized as a location for a new City Hall. Given the city’s recent acquisition of an existing commercial building for relocation, this no longer remains the case. As part of the original development agreement, certain uses were excluded from development on the remaining 10.24 parcel that staff and Council felt would not be suitable to have co-located/adjacent with a City Hall facility – those limitations are identified in Exhibit B – Excluded Uses and Exhibit C – Limited Uses of Attachment #1to this Staff Report.

After informing the owner of the adjacent 10.24 acres of the city’s plans to no longer build on the adjacent 3-acre site, the owner is asking Council to consider amending the Restrictive Covenant. Specifically, • Remove the following from Exhibit B – Excluded Uses;
- Ambulance Service
- Automobile Washing
- Bus Depot and Transit Station
- Service Stations
- Private Clubs and Lodges
• Increase the limited uses identified in Exhibit C from “One (1)” of each use to “Two (2)” of each use.

The owner is also requesting the extension of services including street and utilities to the northern boundary of the 3-acre donated land. This work was planned with the original City Hall build-out. Staff is already working on planning for this extension, per the original development agreement.

Any proposed development would still need to meet city standards and submit for normal entitlement through a site plan application or other entitlement process and necessary conditions of development as identified by staff.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL
Meeting Date: 10/7/2026
Agenda Item: 7

Page 2 of 2 ends

1. Staff is seeking Council directions with regards to the property owner’s request to amend the development agreement.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. N/A

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC

1. Community Engagement

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants

2. Parcel Map

3. August 17, 2022 Staff Report & Supporting Documents

4. February 21, 2024 Staff Report & Supporting Documents FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Potentially

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? N/A

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Kingsburg
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Gity of Kingsburg
Attn: Gity Clerk
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA 93631
EYhib* "C
"
2022-0106696
FRESN0 County Recorder Paul Dictos,-CPA
llednesday , AuE 24, ZO22 0t:09:b4 pll

CONFORMED COPY
Copy of docunent recorded. Has not been compared uith original. -SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
( fxe vnel {raYt't geqo'^d\Y F€eS- hout Col S<c. TllXZ\

ER'S USE

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
By and Among

CITY OF KINGSBURG
And

GEORGE MATOIAN AND DARLENE MATOIAN
Dated: August l'l ,zozz

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ("Declaration") is made and entered into August n , ZO22 ("Ettective Date") by and between the CITY OF KINGSBURG a municipal cor-poratiil-1"City"), and GEORGE MATOIAN, an individual and DARLENE MATOIAN, an individual, Husband and Wife as joint tenants (collectively "Owner").

RECITALS
A. City and the Owner have entered into an Agreement To Development Vacant Land ("Development AgrLement") regarding that certain real property owned by Owner and identified in tf'e Oevelopment Agreement as the "Property" and identified in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Property").

B. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement, the Property will be zoned and located in the City's CH Highway Commercial zone district ("CH District"). Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement, City and Owner have agreed certain land uses which are allowed in the CH District will be excluded from the Property (collectively "Excluded Uses") as identified in Exhibit "8" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. However, the City and Owner have agreed a limited number of Excluded Uses can be developed upon the Property ("Limited Uses;) as identified in Exhibit "C" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

C. ln order to assure the City, the Owner and any subsequent owners of the Property are prohibited from developing the Property for any of the Excluded Uses, except for the Limited Uses, City and Owner have agreed to enter into this Declaration and have this Declaration recorded against title to the ProPertY.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City and Owner entering into the Development Agreement and in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, and other good and vJluable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the City and the Owner hereby agree as follows.

Section 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise specifically defined in this Declaraiion, all capitalized terms used in this Declaration shall have the same meanings as ascribed to them in the Development Agreement.

Section 2. Restriction To Development of The Propertv. City and Owner acknowledge and agree the City and the Owner and all subsequent owners of the Property are prohibited irom and lhall not, at any time, develop or attempt to develop or use any portion of the Property for an Excluded Use. However, City, Owner and all subsequent owners of the Property may develop and use the Property for a Limited Use. City and Owner acknowledge and agree only one of each type of each Limited Use may be developed and used on the entire Property, regardless of the configuration of the Property or the number of parcels that comprise the Property.

Section 3 Title Prioritv Declaration. This Declaration shall be recorded against tifle to the property. Except for real property taxes not yet due and easements of record recorded prior to the date of recordation of this Declaration, this Declaration shall be senior in title to the Property' prior to recordation of this Declaration, City shall obtain a preliminary title report and copies of all documents identified in the preliminary title report (collectively "Prelim") confirming that, upon recordation of the Declaration, the requirements of this Section 3 will be satisfied. lf the Prelim identifies liens or encumbrances, other than identified in this Section 3, recorded against title to the Property (collectively "Prohibited Encumbrances"), Owner shall have thirty (30) days after the date of dwner's receipt oi ttre Prelim to remove, to the satisfaction of the City and the title company issuing the Prelim, all Prohibited Encumbrances from title to the Property. Owner acknowledges the City will not agree to subordinate this Declaration to any other lien or encumbrance.

Section 4. Representations and Warranties of the Owner. (a) The Owner acknowledges, represents and warrants that they understand the land use restrictions applicable to the Property as identified in this Declaration; they understand the 1nancial and legal risks inherent in the restrictions to the use of the Property identified in the Development Agreement and the land use restrictions identified in this Declaration; and that they have not relied on the City or any of its officials, officers, employees, representatives and agents for any guidance or expertise in analyzing the financial or other consequences related to the restrictions on the development and use of the Property as identified in the Development Agreement or this Declaration.

Section 5. Term. This Declaration and all of the terms, covenants and land use restrictions identified in this Declaration shall become effective upon execution of this Declaration and shall remain in fullforce and effect in perpetuity.

Section 6. Covenants to Run With the Land. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1461 of the California Civil Code, the Owner hereby subjects the Property to the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration. The City and the Owner hereby declare their express intent that the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the City's and Owner's successors in title to the Property or any portion thereof and shall burden the Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof or any interest therein shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration regardless of whether such covenants and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instruments.

Section 7. Default; Enforcement. lf City, Owner or any Successor in title the Property or any portion thereof (collectively "successors") defaults in the performance of any covenant, agreement or obligation set forth in this Declaration, and if such default remains uncured for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of written notice of default by the non-defaulting party, then the non-defaulting party shall have the right to declare an "Event of Default" to have occurred under this Declaration; provided, however, that if the default is of such a nature that it cannot be corrected within thirty (30) days, such default shall not constitute an Event of Default hereunder so long as the defaulting party institutes corrective action within said thirty (30) days and diligently pursues such action until the default is corrected. Following the declaration of an Event of Default, the nondefaulting party may exercise any one or more of the following remedies, in addition to all other remedies provided by law or equitY:
(a) by suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity, including injunctive relief, requiring the defaulting party to perform its obligations, agreements and covenants under this Declaration or enjoin any acts or things that may be unlawful, in breach or default under this Declaration or in violation of the rights of the non-defaulting parties under this Declaration; (b) take such other action at law or in equity as may be necessary or desirable to enforce the obligations, covenants and agreements of the non-defaulting party under this Declaration.

City and Owner agree specific enforcement of their respective agreements and obligations contained in this Agreement is the only means by which the each party may fully obtain the benefits of such agreements and obligations made by the other party, and the parties agree damages alone are an inadequate remedy and the imposition of the remedy of specific performance against a defaulting party in the case of any Event of Default by the defaulting party is a proper 2 remedy.

Section 8. Recordinq and Filins.
(a) The City shall cause this Declaration and all amendments and supplements hereto, to be recorded in the real property records of the County of Fresno. The City shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with any such recording. (b) The Owner and the City will file of record such other documents and take such other steps as are reasonably necessary as determined by City, in order to ensure that the requirements and restrictions of this Declaration will be binding upon all owners of the Property. (c) City and Owner hereby covenant to include or reference the requirements, restrictions and covenants contained in this Declaration in any documents transferring any interest in the Property to another person so that such transferee has notice of, and is bound by, such requirements, restrictions and covenants, and obtain the agreement from any transferee to abide by all requirements and restrictions of this Declaration.

Section 9. Governi no Law This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

Section 10. Waiver. No waiver or any breach of any term, condition or provision of this Declaration shall constitute a waiver of any other breach of any other term, condition or provision and no consent of one party to any departures by the other shall be effective unless such waiver shall be in writing and shall be signed by the non-waiving party or a duly authorized agent thereof and the same shalf be effective only for a period, on the conditions and for the specific instances and purposes specified in such writing. No notice to or demand on the non-waiver party in any case shall entitle the non-waiving parly to any other or further notice or demand in similar or other circumstances.

Section 11. Notice. Any notice, consent, authorization, or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received when delivered perlonally, when transmitted by facsimile or email if receipt is verified, one (1) business day after being deposited for next-day delivery with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, of three (3) business days after being mailed by first class mail, charges and postage prepaid, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice at the last address furnished for such purpose by the party to whom notice is directed and addressed as follows:

Owner: City:

George Matoian
Darlene Matoian
875 E Ridgecrest Dr,
Fresno, CA 93730
Telephone: (559) 308-9553
Email: [email protected]
The parties hereto may change their address as set forth in this paragraph by providing the other party with written notice thereof.

Section 12. lnvaliditv. lf any provision of this Declaration held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

City of Kingsburg
Attention: Alex Henderson, City Manager
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, California 93631
Telephone: (559) 897 -5821
Email: alexhenderson@cityofkingsburg-ca. gov
I
J
Section 13. Multiple Counterparts. This Declaration may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

Section 14. Sole and Onlv Aqreement. The Development Agreement and this Declaration supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters. Each party to this Declaration acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or in writing, have been made by any party or anyone acting on behalf of any party which are not embodied in the Development Agreement and this Declaration and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding, Section 15. Attornevs' Fees. lf an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Declaration, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other reasonable relief to which he may be entitled. With respect to any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Declaration, or the documentation related hereto, the parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction and venue of the Superior Court in the County of Fresno, State of California for any proceeding arising hereunder.

Section 16. Amendment. No change, amendment or modification of this Declaration shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto Section 17. Construction and I n. The parties to this Declaration acknowledge that each party has participated in the drafting and revision of this Declaration.

Accordingly, the parties agree that any rule of construction to the effect ihat ambiguities are to be resolved
-against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Declaration or any supplement or exhibit hereto.

Section 18. Successors. The burdens and benefits of this Declaration are appurtenant to the Property described in this Declaration, and consequently follow ownership. The benefits and burdens of this Declaration are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successive owners of the Property.

Section 19
incorporated herein.

Exhibits. The following-listed exhibits are attached hereto and Exh ..A"
Exhibit *Bt'
Exhibit "C"
Property
Excluded Uses
Limited Uses

ISTGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGEI
4 lN WITNESS WI-.IEREOF, the City and the Owner have executed this Declaration by duly authorized representatives, all as of the Effective Date.

Gity:

CITY
By:

FKI
By
ayor
ATTEST:

AB AL ity Clerk

APPROVED AS T FORM
MICHAEL J. N D, City Attorney
[Notary Pages to Follow]
Owner:

GEORGE TOIAN, an individual
NE MATOIAN, an individual
, a Charter City
5 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed ihe document to which this certifiCate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF FRESNO
on August 17 , 2022,
SS
before me, I rL s r Notary Public, personallY
appeared LAURA NORTH, who Proved to e on the of satisfactory evidence to be the person(t) whose name(\) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/tllE{r authorized capacity(ies), and that by f*s/her/their signature(S\on the instrument the person($, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s,) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature (Seal)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF FRESNO +btasAt
on August W, 2022, before me, Notary Public, personallY appeared GEORGE MATOIAN, who proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personQ) whose name(q) is/bre subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/SRe/tlrey executed the same in his/h\r/tlieir authorized capacity(hs), and that by hisihbr/tlpir signature(a) on the instrument the personp), or the entity upon behalf of which the person\s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the taws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal
(Seal)
SS
6 A notary public or other otficer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed ih" do"ument to which this certifiCate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
@"";ff'ffi,{i'i"Hffr'^

FRESNO COUNTY
My Comm. Exp. February g, A023 Signature
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed ihe document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF FRESNO
SS
)
)
)
on August ?-t{ , 2022, before me, l q Notary Public, personally I
I
(. I
appeared DARLENE MATOIAN, who proved me on the of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose nam
ltre/she/tlr\y executed
e(\) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the same in hi{her/tlie ir authorized capacity(iec[ and that by hls/her/their signature$) on the instrument the person(Q, o, the entity upon behalf of which the person\s) acted, executed the instrument.

I cerlify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature (Seal)
7 EXHIBIT "A''

LEGAL DESGRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The real property located in the County of Fresno, State of California, and more particularly described as:

The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the half Section Line 9.754 chains West of the center line of Section 22, Township- 16 south, Range 22East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official Plat of the Survey of said land on file in Bureau of Land Management; thence at right angles South 20 chains; thence at right angles West 9.754 chains; thence at right angles North 20 chains; thence at right angles East 9.754 chains to the true point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to the State of California in deed recorded February 4, 1963 in Book 4817, page 197 of Official Records, as Document No. 9941; Alto excepting therefrom an undivided % interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances lying in or under said land, as reseryed in lnstrument recorded January 27, 1943 in Book 2043, Page 417 of Official Records.

APN: 394-042-04
8 EXHIBIT "B"

EXCLUDED USES
Ambulance service;
Automobile sales, service and repair, including body and fender work; Automobile washing;
Bus depots and transit stations;
Motorcycle sales, service and repair;
Private clubs and lodges;
Recreation vehicle sales and service;
Repair garages;
Service stations (gasoline, butane, and dieselfuels only); Soda fountains;
Used car sales;
Utility trailer sales, service and rental;
Laundromats;
Liquor stores;
Gas and electric transmission lines except as needed for development of Three Arce Parcel or the Remaining Acres, but excluding any above ground lines; Christmas tree sales lots;
Overnight parking for recreational vehicles; mini storage facilities.

Expansion of remodeling of an existing non-conforming use of a structure or land, up to fifty (50) percent or less of the value of the structure, or reestablishment of a nonconforming use which has been damaged, except non-conforming signs and outdoor advertising structures, non-conforming uses occupying a structure with an assessed valuation of less than two hundred (200) dollars, and non-conforming fences, walls and hedges.

Expansion, remodeling, or additions to a conditional use that are not considered an incidental or accessory use as defined in Chapter 17.96.

Uses involving the manufactui'e, sale, repair and maintenance cf light duty utility vehicles and agricultural equipment.
9 1
EXHIBIT "C"

LIMITED USES
One (1) combined automobile and truck dealership (e.9. Ford).

One (1) farm equipment dealership (e.9, John Deere).

One (1) automobile supply store (e.9. AutoZone).

One (1) farm supply zone (e.9. Tractor Supply).

One (1) service station (gasoline, butane, and dieselfuels only) (e.9. Chevron)

2. 3.

4. 5.
10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor North & City Council

REPORT FROM: Alexander J. Henderson, City Manager; ICMA-CM REVIEWED BY: MN AGENDA ITEM: Matoian Agreement To Develop Vacant Land; APN 394-042-04 ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ___Motion ____Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2021, the city began discussions with the owner of the 13-acre parcel located north of the existing Business Park (Parcel Map Attached). The parcel is in the city’s Sphere of Influence. The discussions were initiated as the property owner, George Matoian, originally inquired about the ability to annex the parcel into the city, and to prezone it for Highway Commercial use. Because the property didn’t have a pending “project” for development, it did not meet the requirements for annexation as set forth on the city’s Memorandum of Understanding with Fresno County. Because the property is located in the city’s sphere of influence, and has potential for a higher and better use, the city and property owner began to discuss the potential of a development agreement that would benefit both the city and property owner.

The proposal involves both the city and property owner. Here is a synopsis of the discussion:

City benefit:

1. Receive donated real property (3 acres) to the city for future use, including the potential construction of a new City Hall/Council Chamber facility.

2. 10 additional acres of commercial property with highway frontage that is more likely to be developed, thus increasing potential property tax/sales tax collection for the city. These additional 10 acres would remain owned by the private property owner.

3. Input/partnership with the property owner regarding future compatible development/use through a development agreement.

Property owner benefit

1. Extension of road right-of-way, sewer, water, and ancillary utilities from Avenue B. Currently, the lack of road access and availability of utilities makes future development untenable. The costs for this infrastructure would be borne by the city.

2. City-annexed property in the highway commercial zone; process of annexation to be led by the city.

3. Tax benefit of donation of real property (3 acres valued at ~$110,000/acre.

From an engineering and planning standpoint, it’s unlikely the property will be developed for some time without additional access from the south. One point of access exists from Stroud Ave. on the north side of the property, but this access is off a Fresno County road and is not suitable for other utility extensions or for primary access to the property.

Meeting Date: 08/17/2022
Agenda Item: 6.1

Page 2 of 3 ends

The parties have agreed in principle to a Development Agreement that outlines the responsibility of each party. As part of the agreed upon language, the parties agreed to exclude or limit certain uses that are currently allowed in the Highway Commercial zoning, which city staff did not feel would be appropriate co-located with a government facility. In addition, we are in the process of examining the city HC zone for possible amendments (for example – the inclusion of mixed use residential). Exhibit B of the agreement outlines the excluded uses from the HC zone. If approved, the development agreement also includes a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, indented to keep the agreement in place in the event the current property owner sells the remaining 10 acres.

The development agreement also includes timelines for the installation of the road and utilities, which must be completed within one year after the recordation of the parcel map. The parcel map recordation will occur once the property has been annexed (as approved by Fresno LAFCo.).

Given the benefits outlined for both the property owner and the city, staff is recommending that the city council approve the donation agreement and development agreement as presented.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL

1. Staff recommends approving the proposed donation agreement as presented. The agreement has been reviewed by both the city attorney and owner’s legal counsel.

2. Staff recommends approving the proposed development agreement as presented. The agreement has been reviewed by both the city attorney and owner’s legal counsel.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Council may provide direction at their discretion.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC

1. Promote Sustainable Economic Development

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PRIOR ACTION
Below are a list of items that have been completed to date. • Completed an updated appraisal to determine a fair market value of the land. This will provide the property owner with the gift amount for the donation.
- The appraisal has been completed. Total property is appraised at $1,440,000; (~$110,769/per acre). • Staff to develop possible site plan scenarios that maximizes both the city parcel and remaining parcel to be developed.
- The property owner has agreed to a donation of 3 acres. - Final 3 acre parcel location to be determined.
• After appraisal, consider donation agreement and development agreement that identifies responsibilities of each party.
- This has occurred over the last several months and both agreements are being presented to council for consideration.

The City will pay the costs associated for the following:
a. Pre-zone the entire parcel highway commercial.
b. Process the application with the City of Kingsburg and Fresno LAFCo to annex the entire parcel FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Potentially

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? No

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A

Page 3 of 3 ends

into the City.
c. Process a parcel map or parcel map waiver to divide the parcel into two separate parcels including the 3 acre City parcel.
d. Once the parcel map or parcel map waiver Certificate of Compliance is recorded, construct the street right-of-way and install all utilities as far as the northern boundary line of the City parcel. e. The right-of-way for the street through the entire property will be dedicated on the parcel map or if the parcel map waiver process is used, by separate dedication. Depending upon the storm drainage issues, dedication of a storm drainage basin may also be necessary.

Costs estimates for each of the above processes include:
- LAFco Fees are $7,200
- Extension of relevant roadway/utilities: ~$350,000. Property owner (or designee) will pay the costs and fees to develop the remaining 10 acres, including street right-of-way and utility extensions. - Given the per acre appraised value of the property, even with the utility extension costs, a “sale” of the 3 acres at a sales price equal to the per acre appraised value would be over $330,000, and the parcel would still require the extension of services to be functional.

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. DRAFT Donation Agreement

2. DRAFT Development Agreement

3. Parcel Map: APN 394-042-04
2022-08-09

AGREEMENT FOR DONATION OF REAL PROPERTY
This AGREEMENT FOR DONATION OF REAL PROPERTY (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___day of August, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between GEORGE MATOIAN and DARLENE MATOIAN, husband and wife as joint tenants (“collectively “Donors”), and the CITY OF KINGSBURG, a Charter City and municipal corporation (“City”). Donors and City are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” and singularly as a “Party.” This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts:

RECITALS
A. The City is evaluating the costs, expenses and fees associated with the construction of a new City hall complex to be located on land adjacent to the City’s business park.

B. Donors own real property in Fresno County, California consisting of approximately 13.24 acres (+/-), APN: 394-042-04 and more particularly described in Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and depicted on Exhibit “B” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Real Property”). The Real Property is located adjacent to and north of the City’s business park. In order to reduce the City’s cost of constructing a new City Hall complex, the City has requested Donors donate a

3.0 acre portion of the Real Property to the City upon which the new City hall complex will be constructed.

C. Donors as proponents of City and wishing to benefit the City and continue their support of the City, wish to donate to the City a 3.0 acre parcel of the Real Property to be used for the new City hall complex.

D. The City wishes to accept the donation of the Donation Property from Donors, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Gift and Acceptance. Donors hereby donate to the City and the City hereby accepts Donors’ donation of the Donation Property. The transfer of the Donation Property shall be consummated by means of a Gift Deed in the form of Exhibit “C” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The City shall attach to the Gift Deed a certificate or resolution of acceptance as required by California Government Code Section 27281.The Gift Deed and certificate or resolution of acceptance shall be recorded by the City with the Fresno County Recorder’s office after the Donation Property becomes a separate legal parcel and the City has constructed and installed all necessary offsite public improvements required so that the City can construct the City Hall complex on the Donation Property as more particularly set forth in that certain Agreement to Develop Vacant Land of even date herewith by and between Donor and City.

2. No Consideration. Except for the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, the City has given no consideration to for the transfer of the Donation Property to the City and Donors have not received any consideration from the City for the Donation Property. The City acknowledges and understands that as a result of the conveyance and donation of the Donation Property to the City, Donors intend to take all appropriate charitable deductions against Donors’ State and Federal income taxes (including, without limitation, under Internal Revenue Code Sections 170(s) and 2055 (a) and California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 17201) using any and all values and valuation with respect to the Donation Property, which Donor may reasonably support. In accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 170(f)(8), the City acknowledges that it has not and 2 will not provide any goods or services to Donors in consideration of the donation of the Donation Property.

3. Appraisal. Simon & Hower, Inc. was retained to appraise the Donation Property (“Appraisal”) in order to establish the fair market value of the Donation Property at the time of the transfer of the Donation Property to the City. A copy of the Appraisal has been provided to the City.

The Appraisal establishes a fair market value for the Donation Property as of March 22, 2022 of One Million Four Hundred Forty Dollars ($1,440,000.00). The City has no position as to the Appraisal.

Donors are and shall remain solely responsible for the preparation and filing of any and all Internal Revenue Service and California Franchise Tax Board documents applicable to its donation of the Donation Property as well as any and all tax consequences to Donor arising from such donation.

4. Reporting Requirements. The City shall reasonably cooperate with Donor in complying with any State and Federal reporting requirements applicable to the donation of the Donation Property. By way of example and not by way of limitation, at Donors’ request, the City shall execute Internal Revenue Service Form 8283 (the terms of which shall be consistent with the provisions of this Agreement), prepared by Donors, with respect to the donation of the Donation Property to the City. The City shall not dispose of the Donation Property within three (3) years after recordation of the Gift Deed.

5. Possession. Donors shall deliver possession of the Donation Property to the City at the time the Gift Deed is recorded by the City. The Gift Deed shall be recorded upon the closing of an escrow for the transfer of the Donation Property to the City. The City shall pay all costs associated with the escrow and the recordation of the Gift Deed.

6. Encroachment. Attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and made a part hereof is a depiction of an encroachment of an adjoining landowners’ orchard upon the Real Property (“Encroachment”).

Donors shall, prior to recordation of the Gift Deed, provide to City for City’s and the title company which will issue to the City a policy of title insurance for the Donation Property all documents required by the City and title Company to eliminate the Encroachment.

7. Condition of Property. The City acknowledges and agrees that except as otherwise provided herein and, except for the Encroachment, neither Donors nor any employee, agent or representative of Donors have made any representation or warranty to the City concerning the Donation Property, including, without limitation, the suitability of the Donation Property for the City’s intended use or its compliance with any statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations or the physical status of the Donation Property. The City shall perform and rely solely upon its own independent investigation concerning the Donation Property and the Donation Property’s compliance with any applicable law. The City acknowledges that it is acquiring the Donation Property subject to all existing laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, and that neither Donors nor any of Donors’ representatives, agents or employees have made any warranties, representations or statements regarding any laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of any governmental or quasi-governmental body, entity, district or agency having authority with respect to the use, condition or occupancy of the Donation Property by the City. The City acknowledges and agrees except as otherwise provided herein and, except for the Encroachment, Donation Property is donated “AS IS WHERE IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS”.

8. Existing Surveys and Reports. Within ten (10) days after Donors’ execution of this Agreement, Donors shall furnish the City with copies of all existing surveys, soil reports, engineering studies, environmental audits or reports, site plans, and other information in Donors’ possession pertaining to the Donation Property.
3 9. Covenants, Warranties, and Representations of Donors. Donors hereby make the following covenants, representations and warranties:
(a) Except as otherwise disclosed herein, Donors’ execution of this Agreement and performance of its obligations hereunder will not violate any agreement, option, covenant, condition, obligation or undertaking of Donors related to the Donation Property. (b) Except as otherwise disclosed herein, to Donors’ best knowledge, there are no actions, suits, or proceedings of any kind or nature whatsoever, legal or equitable, pending or threatened against Donors or the Donation Property, and relating to or arising out of Donors’ ownership, management, or operation of the Donation Property, in any court or before or by any federal, state, county or municipal department, commission, board, bureau, agency, or other governmental instrumentality.
(c) There are no agreements with third parties which currently convey any interest of any kind in the Donation Property.
(d) To Donors’ best knowledge, the Donation Property currently is in compliance in all respects with the rules, regulations, ordinances and laws of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Donation Property.
(e) Donors shall notify the City immediately if Donors becomes aware of any new information or material change concerning the Donation Property prior to recordation of the Gift Deed that affects the representations and warranties of Donors set forth in this Agreement.
(f) Donors are unaware of the release of any hazardous materials at/on the Donation Property while Donors were owners of the Donation Property that may be subject to any federal, state, or local law, statute, ordinance, or regulation, and Donors are unware of any underground storage tanks that are or may have been located at the Donation Property.
(g) Donors have all required authority and as required by law to execute this Agreement and the Gift Deed and to bind Donors to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to otherwise perform the provisions of this Agreement as set forth herein. (h) Except for the Encroachment, title to the Donation Property is free and clear of any monetary liens, encumbrances and claims of third parties of any kind.

10. Covenants, Warranties, and Representations of City. The City hereby makes the following covenants, representations and warranties:
(a) The City has the authority to enter into this Agreement, to accept the donation of the Donation Property and receive the Donation Property, and to otherwise perform the provisions of this Agreement as set forth herein. The person executing this Agreement on behalf of the City has the full legal authority and is duly authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the City and to bind the City to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
(b) The City’s execution of this Agreement and performance of its obligations hereunder will not violate any agreement, option, covenant, condition, obligation or undertaking of the City or any law, rule, regulation or ordinance. 4 (c) There are no actions, suits, or proceedings of any kind or nature whatsoever, legal or equitable, pending or, to the best of the City’s knowledge, threatened against the City, in any court or before or by any federal, state, county or municipal department, commission, board, bureau, agency, or other governmental instrumentality seeking to challenge the City’s ability or right to accept the Donors’ donation of the Donation Property and take title to the Donation Property.

11. Survival of Warranties. The satisfaction, truth, accuracy and completeness of each of the representations, warranties and covenants of the City and Donors contained in this Agreement, as of the date of this Agreement and as of the date of recording of the Gift Deed, shall constitute conditions precedent to the obligations of Donors and the City, respectively, hereunder. All representations, warranties, covenants, obligations, responsibilities and agreements set forth in this Agreement shall survive the recordation of the Gift Deed.

12. Brokerage Commissions. The City and Donors each represent and warrant to the other that it has not engaged the services of any real estate broker, salesperson, agent or finder, nor done any other act nor made any statement, promise or undertaking which would result in the imposition of liability for the payment of any real estate brokerage commission, finder’s fee or otherwise in connection with the transaction described in this Agreement.

13. City Remedies. Should Donors for any reason other than City’s breach of any provision of this Agreement fail or refuse to transfer title of the Donation Property to City in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall have the right to pursue any remedy available at law or on equity, including the specific performance of this Agreement by Donors.

14. Notice. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any notice, consent, authorization or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received when delivered personally, when transmitted by facsimile or e-mail if receipt is acknowledged by the addressee, one business day after being deposited for next-day delivery with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or five (5) business days after being mailed by first class mail, charges and postage prepaid, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice at the last address furnished for such purpose by the party to whom notice is directed and addressed as follows:

To City: City of Kingsburg
c/o Alexander Henderson, City Manager
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA 93631
[email protected]
To Donors: George Matoian
Darlene Matoian
201 W. Stroud Avenue
Kingsburg, CA 93631
Telephone: (559) 897-6652
[email protected]

15. Sole and Only Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally 5 or in writing, have been made by any party or anyone acting on behalf of any party that are not embodied in this Agreement and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding.

16. Further Action. The Parties agree to perform all further acts, and to execute, acknowledge, and deliver any documents that may be reasonably necessary, appropriate or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

17. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement by any Party shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

18. Choice of Laws. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to such law.

19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed by the Parties in different counterparts and the signature pages combined to create a document binding on all Parties.

20. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event of any action between Donor and the City seeking enforcement of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or in connection with the Donation Property, the prevailing Party in such action shall be awarded, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief, its reasonable costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, taxable costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

21. Amendment. No change, amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

22. Authority to Execute the Agreement. This Agreement has been approved by the City Council for the City of Kingsburg (“City Council”) at a meeting duly called and lawfully held by the City Council. The person executing this Agreement on behalf of the City has been duly authorized by the City Council to execute this Agreement on behalf of the City and to bind the City to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
(Signature Page Follows This Page)
6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date set forth below.
“DONORS”
Dated: _____________, 2022

By: ____________________________________
George Matoian, an individual
Dated: _____________, 2022

By: ____________________________________
Darlene Matoian, an individual
“GRANTEE”
Dated: ______________, 2022

By: ____________________________________

ALEX HENDERSON,
City Manager, City of Kingsburg
F:\WORD\11\11140.255\Agreement for Donation Execution Version 2022-08-09.docx 7 EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY
The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the half Section Line 9.754 chains West of the center line of Section 22, Township 16 south, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official Plat of the Survey of said land on file in the Bureau of Land Management; thence at right angles South 20 chains; thence at right angles West 9.754 chains; thence at right angles North 20 chains; thence at right angles East 9.754 chains to the true point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to the State of California in deed recorded February 4, 1963 in Book 4817, Page 197 of Official Records, as Document No. 9941; Alto excepting therefrom an undivided ¼ interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances lying in or under said land, as reserved in Instrument recorded January 27, 1943 in Book 2043, Page 417 of Official Records.

APN: 394-042-04
8 EXHIBIT “B”

DEPICTION OF PROPERTY
9 EXHIBIT “C”

GIFT DEED AND CERTIFICATE OR RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE
[SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE]
[SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE]
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $..........-0-......... ..... Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR ..... Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at the time of sale.
_____________________________________
Signature of declarant or agent determining tax
____________________________________________________________________________________

GIFT DEED
FOR NO CONSIDERATION, GEORGE MATOIAN and DARLENE MATOIAN, husband and wife as joint tenants hereby irrevocably GRANT to the CITY OF KINGSBURG, a municipal corporation the real property located in the County of Fresno, State of California, described as SEE EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
APN:

Dated: ____________ ___, 2022 __________________________________________ George Matoian
__________________________________________
Darlene Matoian

MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF KINGSBURG
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY OF KINGSBURG
Attention: City Clerk
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, California 93631
11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF ___________ )
On __________ ___, 2022, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared GEORGE MATOIAN and DARLENE MATOIAN, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature_________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
12 EXHIBIT “A” TO GIFT DEED

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That certain real property located in the City of Kingsburg, County of Fresno, State of California, and more particularly described as follows:

The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

Page 417 ends

APN: 394-042-04
13 GIFT DEED CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the GIFT DEED dated ______________, 2022 from GEORGE MATOIAN and DARLENE MATOIAN to the CITY OF KINGSBURG, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council of the CITY OF KINGSBURG and the Grantee consents to recordation by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: ______________, 2022 CITY OF KINGSBURG,
a municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
ALEXANDER J. HENDERSON,
City Manager
Attest: ___________________________

ABIGAIL PALSGAARD,
City Clerk
14 EXHIBIT “D”

ENCROACHMENT
15 2022-08-09

AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP VACANT LAND
This AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP VACANT LAND (“Agreement”) is made and entered into the ____ day of August, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF KINGSBURG, a Charter city (“City”), and GEORGE MATOIAN, an individual and DARLENE MATOIAN, an individual as Husband and Wife as joint tenants (collectively “Owner”). City and Owner shall be referred in this Agreement jointly as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS
A. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located in Fresno County, California, consisting of approximately 13.24 (+/-) acres, APN: 394-042-04 and more particularly described on Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Property”). The Property is located adjacent to the City of Kingsburg city limits and adjacent to the Kingsburg Business Park.

B. The City is seeking a location for the construction of a new City Hall and related improvements (collectively “City Project”). In accordance with the provisions of an Agreement For Donation of Real Property by and between the City and the Owner, the Owner agreed to donate to the City three (3) acres of the Property (“Three Acre Parcel”) for location of the City Project. The City is reviewing opportunities and alternatives available to the City to provide financing for the construction of the City Project.

C. City has agreed to take the required actions to annex the Property into the City, create the Three Acre Parcel with a parcel map for the Property and construct the off-site improvements for the Three Acre Parcel and Owner has agreed to construct the offsite improvements for the remaining 10.24 acres (collectively “Remaining Acres”) all in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and having determined that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and hereby incorporated into this Agreement and intending to be legally bound, the Parties agree as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS.

The following words and phrases are used as defined terms throughout this Agreement.

Each defined term shall have the meaning set forth below.

1.1 Applications. “Application(s)” means a completed application for the applicable land use entitlements for the City Project and the Remaining Acres and complying with all current City ordinances provided that any additional or alternate land use requirements in City ordinances enacted after the Effective Date, shall apply.

1.2 Assignment. Sale, conveyance, transfer, lease, or assignment of the Remaining Acres.

1.3 Capital Facilities Fees/Development Impact Fees. “Capital Facilities Fees” means a monetary Exaction as defined in Section 1.14, other than a tax or assessment, which is levied by the City for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities and 2 services but does not include fees for processing applications for land use entitlements, or other fees or exactions authorized by this Agreement.

INTENTIONALLY DELETED

1.5 Default. A “Default” refers to any default, breach, or violation of a provision of this Agreement as defined in Section 9. A “City Default” refers to a Default by the City, while a “Owner Default” refers to a Default by Owner.

1.6 Development. “Development” means the improvement of the Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres by constructing and installing the improvements and facilities as defined in this Agreement including, without limitation: the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the development of the City Project or development of the Remaining Acres.

1.7 Development Approvals. “Development Approvals” means City’s approval of all applicable site-specific plans, maps, permits, and entitlements of every kind and nature.

Development Approvals include, without limitation, City’s approval of all applicable site plans, variances, zoning designations, planned unit developments, grading, building, and other similar permits, the site-specific provisions of general plans, environmental assessments, including environmental impact reports.

1.8 Effective Date. The “Effective Date” means the date the Agreement becomes effective as set forth in Section 2.2.

1.9 Exaction. “Exaction” means dedications of land and payment of development fees including, without limitation capital facilities fees.

1.10 Improvements. “Improvements” mean all of the public Improvements and Private Improvements, respectively, to be constructed onsite or offsite the Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres in accordance with the Development Approvals and the Land Use Regulations.

1.11 Land Use Regulations. “Land Use Regulations” means all federal, state and local land use laws, regulations and rules applicable to the development of the City Project or the Remaining Acres.

1.12 Mortgage. “Mortgage” means a deed of trust, leasehold or other transaction in which all or any portion of or interest in the Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres are pledged as security.

1.13 Mortgagee. “Mortgagee” shall mean the holder of a beneficial interest under a Mortgage, including the beneficiary of a deed of trust and the holder of any Mortgage, or other security interest, or the lessor under a lease-back, or the grantee under any other conveyance for financing.

1.14 Private Improvements. “Private Improvements” means all improvements to be constructed on the Remaining Acres in accordance with Development Approvals and Land Use Regulations.

1.15 Public Improvements. “Public Improvements” means all on-site and off-site public improvements required to be constructed as part of the development of the Three Acre 3 Parcel or the Remaining Acres pursuant to all applicable City specifications, development standards and requirements and as otherwise required by the Development Approvals and Land Use Regulations for the Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres.

INTENTIONALLY DELETED

1.17 Term. The “Term” means that period of time during which this Agreement shall be in effect and bind the Parties.

2. TERM.

2.1 Term. The Term shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of _______________, except as to those provisions in this Agreement which by their terms survive the termination of this Agreement.

3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY PROJECT. City will perform the following, at its sole cost and expense:
a. Obtain all land use entitlements to:
(1) Annex the Property into the city limits of the City and zone the Property Highway Commercial.
(2) Record a parcel map or parcel map waiver and Certificate of Compliance (collectively “Parcel Map”) to create the Three Acre Parcel as a separate legal parcel under the California Subdivision Map Act. Unless Owner provides City with the division of the Remaining Acres into four (4) or less separate legal parcels to be shown on the Parcel Map, the Remaining Acres will be shown as the “designated remainder” on the Parcel Map and Owner will divide the designated remainder into separate parcels at a later date, in Owner’s sole discretion (3) Construct and install offsite street improvements, utility lines, water line, sewer line and storm drain line (collectively “City Offsite Improvements”) extending to the northern boundary line of the Three Acre Parcel in locations on and in the Property that will allow for extension of such offsite improvements by Owner to the Remaining Acres. City shall complete the construction and installation of the City Offsite Improvements within one (1) year after the date of recordation of the Parcel Map.
(4) Owner acknowledges and agrees the City’s Land Use Regulations, master plans and improvement standards and conditions may require the dedication of certain improvements, including without limitation, street right-of-way, utility easements, and storm drainage basins (collectively “Dedications”) at specific locations in and upon the Property, including the Remaining Acres to be dedicated on the Parcel Map or by way of separate dedications, in order to allow for further development of the Property. City will advise Owner of the location of the Dedications prior completion of the processing of the Parcel Map or parcel map waiver.
(5) Owner shall have no financial responsibility for the annexation of the Property into the City in addition to any costs associated with the prezoning of the Property to Highway Commercial (described below).
4 4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE REMAINING ACRES.

4.1 Development. The development of the Remaining Acres shall conform to the Development Approvals, Land Use Regulations, all local building codes, public works improvement standards, other applicable ordinances and all the provisions of this Agreement.

4.2 Right to Develop. The Development Approvals and Land Use Regulations shall control the development of the Remaining Acres, including, but not limited to, the uses of the Remaining Acres, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed structures, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Remaining Acres.

4.3 Capital Facilities Fees/Development Impact Fees. Owner shall pay to the City the applicable City Capital Facilities Fees/Development Impact Fees (collectively “Capital Fees”) for the development of the Remaining Acres in accordance with the provisions of Section 15.48 of Title 15 of the City Municipal Code and related City Ordinances and City Council Resolutions.

4.4 Public Improvements. Any Public Improvements which will be dedicated to the City or any other public agency, shall be constructed and installed by Owner in accordance with all applicable City specifications, development standards and requirements and as otherwise required by applicable Land Use Regulations for Remaining Acres.

5. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REGARDING USE OF THE PROPERTY. Even though the Property will be zoned Highway Commercial, Owner and City believe it is in their collective best interests for the future development and use of the Property, to restrict the use of the Property.

City and Developer agree the uses identified on Exhibit “B” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (collectively “Excluded Uses”) will be excluded from and not allowed to operate on the Property. Except that, the following limited uses (collectively “Limited Uses”) will not be considered Excluded Uses on the Remaining Acres: (i) one (1) combined automobile and truck dealership (e.g. Ford); (ii) one (1) farm equipment dealership (e.g. John Deere); (iii) one (1) automobile supply store (e.g. AutoZone); (iv) one (1) farm supply zone (e.g. Tractor Supply); and (v) one (1) service station (gasoline, butane and diesel fuels only) (e.g. Chevron).

The City will proceed with the amendment of Chapter 17.40.040 (CH Highway Commercial District) of the Kingsburg Municipal Code to allow for the use of the Mixed Use Combined District Overlay (MXU Mixed Use Combined District) identified in Chapter 17.48.020 of the Kingsburg Municipal Code for development in the CH Highway Commercial Zone District. Any Mixed-Use development in the CH Highway Commercial Zone District will be a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.76 of the Kingsburg Municipal Code. Should the Owner and City agree to add or exclude one or more other uses (collectively “Other Uses”) in the CH Highway Commercial Zone District, Owner will file an application with the City seeking to amend Section 17.40.040 D. of Chapter 17.40 of Title 17 of the Kingsburg Municipal Code to identity any Other Uses to be added as Conditional Uses in the CH Highway Commercial Zone District under Chapter 17.40.040 D. of the Kingsburg Municipal Code or excluded as a use in the CH Highway Commercial Zone District.

Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Owner and City will execute a Declaration Restrictive Covenant in the form of Exhibit “C” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Declaration”) . Owner’s performance of Owner’s obligations under Section 3 of the Declaration shall be a condition precedent to City’s performance of City’s obligations under 5 Section 3 of this Agreement. After execution of the Declaration the City will record the Declaration against title to the Property.

6. FEES, TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS.

6.1 Payment of Fees, Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay all fees, taxes and assessments as are described in or required by this Agreement, the Development Approvals or Land Use Regulations to the extent such fees, taxes and assessments apply to the Remaining Acres.
a. Owner shall pay any fees, taxes or assessments imposed on a City-wide basis, if applicable to Owner, which are not specifically related to the development of the Remaining Acres including, without limitation, business license fees, utility taxes, landscape and lighting assessments, community service assessments and bond assessments, whether or not they existed on the Effective Date; and
b. Owner shall pay all fees applicable to any Application charged by City at the time such Application is filed by Owner.

7. PROCESSING OF REQUESTS AND APPLICATIONS; OTHER GOVERNMENT PERMITS.

7.1 Processing. Owner, in a timely manner, will provide City with all documents, applications, plans and other information necessary for City to process Owner’s Applications and carry out its obligations under this Agreement and will cause Owner’s planners, engineers and all other consultants to submit in a timely manner all required materials and documents therefore.

7.2 Other Governmental Permits. Owner shall apply in a timely manner for such other permits and approvals as may be required from other governmental or quasigovernmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Remaining Acres and as may be required for the development of, or provision of services to, the Remaining Acres. City shall cooperate with Owner in its efforts to obtain such permits and approvals.

7.3 Public Agency Coordination. City and Owner shall cooperate and use reasonable efforts in coordinating the implementation of the Development Approvals with other public agencies, if any, having jurisdiction over the Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres.

8. AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

8.1 Initiation of Amendment. Either Party may propose an amendment to this Agreement.

8.2 Procedure. The procedure for proposing and adopting an amendment to this Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this Agreement in the first instance.

8.3 Consent. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, no amendment to any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless set forth in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of each of the Parties to this Agreement and approved by the City Council for the City.
6 8.4 Effect of Amendment to Agreement. The Parties agree that except as expressly set forth in any such amendment, an amendment to this Agreement will not alter, affect, impair, modify, waive, or otherwise impact any other rights, duties, or obligations of either Party or any other provision under this Agreement.

9. DEFAULT, REMEDIES AND TERMINATION.

9.1 Rights of Non-Defaulting Party After Default. The Parties acknowledge that both Parties shall have all legal and equitable remedies as provided by law following the occurrence of a default. Before this Agreement may be terminated or action may be taken to obtain judicial relief, the Party seeking relief (“Non-Defaulting Party”) shall comply with the provisions of Section 9.2.

9.2 Notice and Opportunity to Cure. A Non-Defaulting Party may declare a default under this Agreement only in accordance with the procedures hereinafter set forth for any failure or breach by the other party (“Defaulting Party”) to perform any responsibility or obligation to be performed by the Defaulting Party under the terms of this Agreement. The Non-Defaulting Party must provide written notice (“Default Notice”) to the Defaulting Party setting forth the nature of the breach or failure and the actions required by Defaulting Party to cure such breach or failure. The Defaulting Party shall be deemed in “default” under this Agreement, if the Defaulting Party has failed to take such actions and cure such default within thirty (30) days after the date of the Default Notice (or such lesser time as may be specifically provided in this Agreement). However, if such default cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period, and, as long as the Defaulting Party does each of the following the Defaulting Party shall not be deemed in default of this Agreement:
a. Notifies the Non-Defaulting Party in writing of the reasons the default is not curable within the thirty (30) day period;
b. Notifies the Non-Defaulting Party in writing of the Defaulting Party’s proposed course of action to cure the default;
c. Promptly commences to cure the default within the initial thirty (30) day period; d. Makes weekly written reports (reports by e-mail are acceptable) to the NonDefaulting Party as to the progress of the program of cure; and e. Diligently prosecutes such cure to completion.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Defaulting Party shall be deemed in default under this Agreement if said breach or failure involves the payment of money and the Defaulting Party has failed to completely cure said monetary default within fifteen (15) days (or such lesser time as may be specifically provided in this Agreement) after the date of the Default Notice.

9.3 City’s Remedies for Owner Default. If Owner fails to cure a default within the cure periods identified in this Section 9 (or such lesser time as may be specifically provided in this Agreement), City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and pursue any remedy available at law or on equity.

9.4 Owner’s Remedies for City’s Default. If City fails to cure a default within the cure periods identified in this Section 9 (or such lesser time as may be specifically provided in this 7 Agreement), Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and pursue any remedy available at law or on equity.

9.5 Mediation. All questions and disputes with respect to rights and obligations of the Parties arising under the terms of this Agreement shall be submitted to non-binding mediation.

Either Party may demand mediation by filing a written demand with the other Party within thirty (30) days after occurrence of the dispute. The Parties may agree on one mediator. If they cannot agree on one mediator, there shall be three mediators: one named in writing by each of the Parties within ten (10) days after demand for mediation is received by the other Party, and a third chosen by the two appointed mediators. Should either Party refuse or neglect to join in the appointment of the mediator(s) the mediator selected by the other Party shall act as the sole mediator.

Mediation shall take place before the mediator(s) in the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, at the time and place agreed to by the Parties and the mediator. At the mediation, any relevant evidence may be presented by either Party, and the formal rules of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings shall not govern. Evidence may be admitted or excluded in the sole discretion of the mediator(s). The mediator(s) shall hear and determine the matter and shall execute and acknowledge the decision in writing and cause a copy of the writing to be delivered to each of the Parties.

If there is only one mediator, his or her decision shall be conclusive on the Parties, and if there are three mediators, the decision of any two shall be conclusive. The submission of a dispute to the mediator(s) and the rendering of a decision by the mediator(s) shall be a condition precedent to any right of legal action on the dispute. The costs of the mediation shall be borne equally by the Parties.

9.6 Waiver of Breach. By commencing development of any portion of the Remaining Acres, Owner shall be deemed to have waived any claim that any condition to the Development Approvals theretofore issued are unlawful or improper.

10. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.

11. INDEMNITY.

11.1 Third-Party Litigation.
a. Non-liability of City. City shall have no liability under this Agreement for any failure of City to perform under this Agreement or the inability of Owner to develop the Remaining Acres as contemplated by any Development Approvals or this Agreement as the result of a statutory enactment or final judicial determination that on the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the Development Approvals, this Agreement, or portions thereof, or any other law, ordinance, rule or regulation, were invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law. b. Legal Challenges. In the event that a legal challenge to the validity of this Agreement, the development of the Remaining Acres or the Development Approvals is filed prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and such challenge results in a final judicial determination that any portion of this Agreement, the development of the Remaining Acres or the Development Approvals are not valid or were not properly adopted or approved, Owner and City agree their respective obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement shall be stayed until final judicial determination of the legal challenge. If, after the final judicial 8 determination of the legal challenge, the provisions of this Agreement are not held as invalid and allows for each Party’s performance under this Agreement or as this Agreement may be amended by the Parties, the Parties will proceed with performance of their respective obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.
c. Participation in Litigation; Indemnity. The City shall not have any obligation to defend any legal challenge to the validity of this Agreement, the development of the Remaining Acres or the Development Approvals. If Owner elects to defend any such legal challenge, Owner agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its elected and appointed officials, boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, liabilities, losses, damages, penalties, obligations and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and costs) arising from any challenge in any way related to the development of the Remaining Acres, including, without limitation, a challenge to the validity of this Agreement or the Development Approvals.

11.2 Hold Harmless; Owner’s Construction and Other Activities. Owner agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its elected and appointed officials, boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all actions, suits, claims, liability, losses, damages, penalties, obligations, and expense (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees) in any way related with development of the Remaining Acres and construction and installation of Remaining Acres of any improvements, including, without limitation, Public Improvements and Structures, personal injury or death, or property damage which may arise, directly or indirectly, from the actions or omissions of Owner or Owner’s agents, contractors, subcontractors or employees and compliance with prevailing wage laws, regulations and rules.

11.3 Survival of Indemnity Obligations. All indemnity obligations hereunder shall survive termination of this Agreement for any reason.

12. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NO LIABILITY; NON-DISCRIMINATION.

12.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No elected or appointed officials, boards, commissions, officers, agents or employees of City shall be personally liable to the Owner, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City.

12.2 Conflict of Interest. No official, officer or employee of City, officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he/she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any state statute or regulation.

12.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Each Party covenants that, by and for itself, its successors and assignees, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Each Party shall take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.
9 13. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION.

13.1 Owner’s Mortgage Lien. As a condition precedent to receiving any rights under this Agreement, the Mortgagee or successor (“New Owner”) who acquires an interest in the Remaining Acres by foreclosure or trustee’s sale, must execute an Assumption Agreement (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “C”) whereby the New Owner agrees that all of the terms, conditions, covenants and restrictions of this Agreement shall be binding and effective against the New Owner. The New Owner shall execute the Assumption Agreement within ten (10) days after acquiring title to the Remaining Acres or any portion thereof. The New Owner’s failure to execute the Assumption Agreement within said ten (10) day time period shall constitute a Owner’s default under this Agreement.

14. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. Owner represents, warrants, and covenants to City that Owner shall not at any time use or permit the Remaining Acres to be used in violation of any and all laws, rules and regulations which relate to or govern hazardous materials and/or the environmental conditions in, on, under or about the Property, including, without limitation, air quality, soil and surface and subsurface water conditions (individually and collectively, “Environmental Regulations”). Owner assumes sole and full responsibility for, and shall remedy at its sole cost and expense, all such violations. Owner shall not at any time use, generate, release, store, treat, dispose of, or otherwise deposit, in, on, under or about the Remaining Acres, any hazardous or toxic substances, wastes or related materials (“Hazardous Materials”) or permit or allow any third party, including, without limitation, Owner’s employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and materialman to do so without compliance, at Owner’s sole cost and expense, with all Environmental Regulations. For the purposes of this Section 13, Hazardous Materials shall include, without limitation, asbestos, asbestos-containing matter, and the group or organic compounds known as polychlorinated byphenyls, as well as substances defined as “hazardous substances” or “toxic substances” in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq; (“CERCLA”); the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 1802; the Resource Conservation Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq; (“RCRA”); those substances identified in regulations, orders, and publications adopted pursuant to California Health and Safety Code 25249.8, as “Chemicals Known to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity”; and those substances defined as “hazardous wastes” in Section 25117 of the California Health and Safety Code and in the regulations adopted and publications promulgated pursuant thereto and any Regulation which now exists or which may be enacted or become effective after the Effective Date; all as the foregoing may be amended or re-codified from time to time. It shall be a material default by Owner under this Agreement, entitling City to exercise any of its rights and remedies under Section 9 of this Agreement, if any provision of this Section 14 is not strictly complied with at all times.

Owner shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, liabilities, losses, damages, penalties, forfeitures, or expenses (including attorneys’ fees) arising from or caused in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by (A) the presence in, on, under or about the Remaining Acres or discharge in or from the Remaining Acres of any Hazardous Materials or the use, analysis, storage, transportation, disposal release, threatened release, discharge or generation of Hazardous Materials to, in, on, under, about or from the Remaining Acres by Owner or any employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor or materialman, or (B) the failure to comply with any Environmental Regulations by Owner, or any employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor or materialman. Owner’s obligations hereunder shall 10 include, without limitation, all costs of any required or necessary repair, cleanup or detoxification or decontamination of the Remaining Acres and the preparation and implementation of any closure, remedial action or the required plans in connection therewith, and shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of the term of the Agreement or any extension thereof.

15. GENERAL.

15.1 Force Majeure. The time within which Owner or City shall be required to perform any act under this Agreement shall be extended by a period of time equal to the number of days during which performance of such act is delayed due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock-outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, natural disasters, Acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, archaeological finds, initiative or referendum, moratoria, or unusually severe weather, or any other similar causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any such cause shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause. Any act or failure to act on the part of a Party shall not excuse performance by that Party.

15.2 Construction of Agreement. The language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole and given its fair meaning. The captions of the sections and subsections are for convenience only and shall not influence construction. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. This Agreement is not intended to constitute, or be construed to constitute, an impermissible attempt to contract away the legislative and governmental functions of the City, and in particular, City’s powers. This Agreement shall not, be deemed to constitute the surrender or abrogation of City’s governmental powers over the Property.

15.3 Attorney’s Fees. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other reasonable relief to which it may be entitled. With respect to any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement, or the documentation related hereto, the Parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction and venue, in the County of Fresno, State of California for any proceeding arising hereunder.

15.4 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of all the provisions of this Agreement.

15.5 Waiver. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party’s right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement.

15.6 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. The only parties to this Agreement are Owner and City. There are no third-party beneficiaries and except as otherwise identified in this Agreement, including, without limitations, the provisions of Section 10 of this Agreement as they relate to the City, this Agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed to benefit or be enforceable by any other person or entity.

15.7 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the Party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited Party. 11 15.8 Authority to Execute. Owner and the persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Owner warrant that (i) Owner is a California limited partnership duly organized, existing and in good standing in the State of California, (ii) such persons are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of Owner, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, Owner is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement, (iv) the entering into of this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which Owner is bound and (v) there is no litigation or legal proceeding which would prevent Owner from entering into this Agreement and performing its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.

15.9 Notice. Any notice, consent, authorization, or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received when delivered personally, when transmitted by facsimile or email if receipt is verified, one (1) business day after being deposited for next-day delivery with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or three (3) business days after being mailed by first class mail, charges and postage prepaid, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice at the last address furnished for such purpose by the party to whom notice is directed and addressed as follows:

Owner:

George Matoian
Darlene Matoian
201 W. Stroud Avenue
Kingsburg, California 93631
Telephone: (559) 308-9553
Email: [email protected]
City:

City of Kingsburg
Attention: Alex Henderson, City Manager
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, California 93631
Telephone: (559) 897-5821
Email: [email protected]
The parties hereto may change their address as set forth in this paragraph by providing the other party with written notice thereof.

15.10 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent necessary to implement this Agreement. Upon the request of either Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

15.11 Recitals. The recitals in this Agreement constitute part of this Agreement and each Party shall be entitled to rely on the truth and accuracy of each recital as an inducement to enter into this Agreement.

15.12 Relationship of Parties. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties that neither Party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder. The only relationship between City and Owner is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the Owner of such private property.

15.13 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions, and agreements between the Parties. Any amendment or modification to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the Parties. 12 15.14 Exhibits. The following-listed exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated therein.

Exhibit “A” Property
Exhibit “B” Excluded Uses
Exhibit “C” Declaration of Restrictive Covenants

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date.

City:

CITY OF KINGSBURG, a Charter City
By: ______________________________
MICHELLE ROMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
ABIGAIL PALSGAARD, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ______________________________
MICHAEL J. NOLAND, City Attorney
Owner:

__________________________________
GEORGE MATOIAN, an individual
__________________________________
DARLENE MATOIAN, an individual
F:\WORD\11\11140.255\Agreement to Develop Vacant Land Execution Version 2022-08-09.doc 13 EXHIBIT “A”

PROPERTY
The real property located in the County of Fresno, State of California, and more particularly described as:

The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the half Section Line 9.754 chains West of the center line of Section 22, Township 16 south, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official Plat of the Survey of said land on file in Bureau of Land Management; thence at right angles South 20 chains; thence at right angles West 9.754 chains; thence at right angles North 20 chains; thence at right angles East 9.754 chains to the true point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to the State of California in deed recorded February 4, 1963 in Book 4817, page 197 of Official Records, as Document No. 9941; Alto excepting therefrom an undivided ¼ interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances lying in or under said land, as reserved in Instrument recorded January 27, 1943 in Book 2043, Page 417 of Official Records.

APN: 394-042-04
EXHIBIT “B”

EXCLUDED USES

Ambulance service;
Automobile sales, service and repair, including body and fender work; Automobile washing;
Bus depots and transit stations;
Motorcycle sales, service and repair;

Private clubs and lodges;
Recreation vehicle sales and service;
Repair garages;
Service stations (gasoline, butane and diesel fuels only); Soda fountains;
Used car sales;
Utility trailer sales, service and rental;
Laundromats;
Liquor stores;
Gas and electric transmission lines except as needed for development of Three Acre Parcel or the Remaining Acres, but excluding any above ground lines; Christmas tree sales lots;
Overnight parking for recreational vehicles; mini storage facilities.

Expansion of remodeling of an existing non-conforming use of a structure or land, up to fifty (50) percent or less of the value of the structure, or reestablishment of a non-conforming use which has been damaged, except non-confirming signs and outdoor advertising structures, non-conforming uses occupying a structure with an assessed valuation of less than two hundred (200) dollars, and non-conforming fences, walls and hedges.

Expansion, remodeling, or additions to a conditional use that are not considered an incidental or accessory use as defined in Chapter 17.96.

Uses involving the manufacture, sale, repair and maintenance of light duty utility vehicles and agricultural equipment.

EXHIBIT “C”

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Kingsburg
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Kingsburg
Attn: City Clerk
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA 93631
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
By and Among

CITY OF KINGSBURG
And

GEORGE MATOIAN AND DARLENE MATOIAN
Dated: August ___, 2022
2022-08-09

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ("Declaration") is made and entered into August ____, 2022 (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF KINGSBURG a municipal corporation ("City"), and GEORGE MATOIAN, an individual and DARLENE MATOIAN, an individual, Husband and Wife as joint tenants (collectively "Owner").

RECITALS
A. City and the Owner have entered into an Agreement To Development Vacant Land (“Development Agreement”) regarding that certain real property owned by Owner and identified in the Development Agreement as the “Property” and identified in Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (“Property”).

B. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement, the Property will be zoned and located in the City’s CH Highway Commercial zone district (“CH District”). Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement, City and Owner have agreed certain land uses which are allowed in the CH District will be excluded from the Property (collectively “Excluded Uses”) as identified in Exhibit “B” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. However, the City and Owner have agreed a limited number of Excluded Uses can be developed upon the Property (“Limited Uses”) as identified in Exhibit “C” which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

C. In order to assure the City, the Owner and any subsequent owners of the Property are prohibited from developing the Property for any of the Excluded Uses, except for the Limited Uses, City and Owner have agreed to enter into this Declaration and have this Declaration recorded against title to the Property.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City and Owner entering into the Development Agreement and in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the City and the Owner hereby agree as follows.

Section 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise specifically defined in this Declaration, all capitalized terms used in this Declaration shall have the same meanings as ascribed to them in the Development Agreement.

Section 2. Restriction To Development of The Property. City and Owner acknowledge and agree the City and the Owner and all subsequent owners of the Property are prohibited from and shall not, at any time, develop or attempt to develop or use any portion of the Property for an Excluded Use. However, City, Owner and all subsequent owners of the Property may develop and use the Property for a Limited Use. City and Owner acknowledge and agree only one of each type of each Limited Use may be developed and used on the entire Property, regardless of the configuration of the Property or the number of parcels that comprise the Property.

Section 3. Title Priority of Declaration. This Declaration shall be recorded against title to the Property. Except for real property taxes not yet due and easements of record recorded prior to the date of recordation of this Declaration, this Declaration shall be senior in title to the Property.

Prior to recordation of this Declaration, City shall obtain a preliminary title report and copies of all documents identified in the preliminary title report (collectively “Prelim”) confirming that, upon recordation of the Declaration, the requirements of this Section 3 will be satisfied. If the Prelim identifies liens or encumbrances, other than identified in this Section 3, recorded against title to the Property (collectively “Prohibited Encumbrances”), Owner shall have thirty (30) days after the date 2 of Owner’s receipt of the Prelim to remove, to the satisfaction of the City and the title company issuing the Prelim, all Prohibited Encumbrances from title to the Property. Owner acknowledges the City will not agree to subordinate this Declaration to any other lien or encumbrance.

Section 4. Representations and Warranties of the Owner. (a) The Owner acknowledges, represents and warrants that they understand the land use restrictions applicable to the Property as identified in this Declaration; they understand the financial and legal risks inherent in the restrictions to the use of the Property identified in the Development Agreement and the land use restrictions identified in this Declaration; and that they have not relied on the City or any of its officials, officers, employees, representatives and agents for any guidance or expertise in analyzing the financial or other consequences related to the restrictions on the development and use of the Property as identified in the Development Agreement or this Declaration.

Section 6. Covenants to Run With the Land. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1461 of the California Civil Code, the Owner hereby subjects the Property to the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration. The City and the Owner hereby declare their express intent that the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the City’s and Owner's successors in title to the Property or any portion thereof and shall burden the Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof or any interest therein shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration regardless of whether such covenants and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instruments.

Section 7. Default; Enforcement. If City, Owner or any Successor in title the Property or any portion thereof (collectively “Successors”) defaults in the performance of any covenant, agreement or obligation set forth in this Declaration, and if such default remains uncured for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of written notice of default by the non-defaulting party, then the non-defaulting party shall have the right to declare an "Event of Default" to have occurred under this Declaration; provided, however, that if the default is of such a nature that it cannot be corrected within thirty (30) days, such default shall not constitute an Event of Default hereunder so long as the defaulting party institutes corrective action within said thirty (30) days and diligently pursues such action until the default is corrected. Following the declaration of an Event of Default, the nondefaulting party may exercise any one or more of the following remedies, in addition to all other remedies provided by law or equity:
(a) by suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity, including injunctive relief, requiring the defaulting party to perform its obligations, agreements and covenants under this Declaration or enjoin any acts or things that may be unlawful, in breach or default under this Declaration or in violation of the rights of the non-defaulting parties under this Declaration; (b) take such other action at law or in equity as may be necessary or desirable to enforce the obligations, covenants and agreements of the non-defaulting party under this Declaration.

City and Owner agree specific enforcement of their respective agreements and obligations contained in this Agreement is the only means by which the each party may fully obtain the benefits of such agreements and obligations made by the other party, and the parties agree damages alone are an inadequate remedy and the imposition of the remedy of specific performance 3 against a defaulting party in the case of any Event of Default by the defaulting party is a proper remedy.

Section 8. Recording and Filing.
(a) The City shall cause this Declaration and all amendments and supplements hereto, to be recorded in the real property records of the County of Fresno. The City shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with any such recording. (b) The Owner and the City will file of record such other documents and take such other steps as are reasonably necessary as determined by City, in order to ensure that the requirements and restrictions of this Declaration will be binding upon all owners of the Property. (c) City and Owner hereby covenant to include or reference the requirements, restrictions and covenants contained in this Declaration in any documents transferring any interest in the Property to another person so that such transferee has notice of, and is bound by, such requirements, restrictions and covenants, and obtain the agreement from any transferee to abide by all requirements and restrictions of this Declaration.

Section 9. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

Section 10. Waiver. No waiver or any breach of any term, condition or provision of this Declaration shall constitute a waiver of any other breach of any other term, condition or provision and no consent of one party to any departures by the other shall be effective unless such waiver shall be in writing and shall be signed by the non-waiving party or a duly authorized agent thereof and the same shall be effective only for a period, on the conditions and for the specific instances and purposes specified in such writing. No notice to or demand on the non-waiver party in any case shall entitle the non-waiving party to any other or further notice or demand in similar or other circumstances.

Section 11. Notice. Any notice, consent, authorization, or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received when delivered personally, when transmitted by facsimile or email if receipt is verified, one (1) business day after being deposited for next-day delivery with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, of three (3) business days after being mailed by first class mail, charges and postage prepaid, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice at the last address furnished for such purpose by the party to whom notice is directed and addressed as follows:

Owner: City:

George Matoian City of Kingsburg
Darlene Matoian Attention: Alex Henderson, City Manager 201 W. Stroud Avenue 1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, California 93631 Kingsburg, California 93631 Telephone: (559) 308-9553 Telephone: (559) 897-5821
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] The parties hereto may change their address as set forth in this paragraph by providing the other party with written notice thereof.

4 Section 12. Invalidity. If any provision of this Declaration held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

Section 13. Multiple Counterparts. This Declaration may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

Section 14. Sole and Only Agreement. The Development Agreement and this Declaration supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters. Each party to this Declaration acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or in writing, have been made by any party or anyone acting on behalf of any party which are not embodied in the Development Agreement and this Declaration and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding.

Section 15. Attorneys' Fees. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Declaration, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other reasonable relief to which he may be entitled. With respect to any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Declaration, or the documentation related hereto, the parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction and venue of the Superior Court in the County of Fresno, State of California for any proceeding arising hereunder.

Section 16. Amendment. No change, amendment or modification of this Declaration shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

Section 17. Construction and Interpretation. The parties to this Declaration acknowledge that each party has participated in the drafting and revision of this Declaration.

Accordingly, the parties agree that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Declaration or any supplement or exhibit hereto.

Section 19. Exhibits. The following-listed exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Exhibit “A” Property
Exhibit “B” Excluded Uses
Exhibit “C” Limited Uses
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Owner have executed this Declaration by duly authorized representatives, all as of the Effective Date.

City: Owner:

CITY OF KINGSBURG, a Charter City
By: _____________________________ ______________________________ LAURA NORTH, Mayor GEORGE MATOIAN, an individual
ATTEST:
________________________________ ______________________________ ABIGAIL PALSGAARD, City Clerk DARLENE MATOIAN, an individual APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _____________________________
MICHAEL J. NOLAND, City Attorney
[Notary Pages to Follow]
6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF FRESNO )
On August ____, 2022, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared LAURA NORTH, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature_____________________________ (Seal)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF FRESNO )
On August ___, 2022, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared GEORGE MATOIAN, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature_____________________________ (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF FRESNO )
On August ____, 2022, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared DARLENE MATOIAN, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The real property located in the County of Fresno, State of California, and more particularly described as:

The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the half Section Line 9.754 chains West of the center line of Section 22, Township 16 south, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official Plat of the Survey of said land on file in Bureau of Land Management; thence at right angles South 20 chains; thence at right angles West 9.754 chains; thence at right angles North 20 chains; thence at right angles East 9.754 chains to the true point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to the State of California in deed recorded February 4, 1963 in Book 4817, page 197 of Official Records, as Document No. 9941; Alto excepting therefrom an undivided ¼ interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances lying in or under said land, as reserved in Instrument recorded January 27, 1943 in Book 2043, Page 417 of Official Records.

APN: 394-042-04
9 EXHIBIT “B”

EXCLUDED USES
Ambulance service;
Automobile sales, service and repair, including body and fender work; Automobile washing;
Bus depots and transit stations;
Motorcycle sales, service and repair;

Expansion, remodeling, or additions to a conditional use that are not considered an incidental or accessory use as defined in Chapter 17.96.

Uses involving the manufacture, sale, repair and maintenance of light duty utility vehicles and agricultural equipment.
10 EXHIBIT “C”

LIMITED USES

1. One (1) combined automobile and truck dealership (e.g. Ford).

2. One (1) farm equipment dealership (e.g. John Deere).

3. One (1) automobile supply store (e.g. AutoZone).

4. One (1) farm supply zone (e.g. Tractor Supply).

5. One (1) service station (gasoline, butane, and diesel fuels only) (e.g. Chevron).

Subject Parcel

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
REPORT TO: Mayor Pursell, Jr. & City Council
REPORT FROM: Holly Owen, Community Development Director REVIEWED BY: CW AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Annexation 2024-01, (Matoian Annexation), Pre-Zone 2024-01, and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Matoian Annexation ACTION REQUESTED: ___Ordinance ___Resolution ____Motion ____Receive/File

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This reorganization is a City-sponsored annexation of 13.18 acres of property into the City of Kingsburg. The property is contiguous to the City limits, north of the Kingsburg Business Park (Avenue B and Ventura Court) and southwest of Highway 99. The reorganization will require several actions to annex the property into the City of Kingsburg:

1. Annexation into the City of Kingsburg of 13.18 acres of property and known as the Matoian Reorganization;

2. Pre-Zone the property from Fresno County’s AE-20 zone district to Kingsburg’s highway commercial (CH) zone district, and

3. Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the reorganization, and acceptance of the Mitigated Monitoring Program.

The 13.18 acre annexation site is contiguous to the City limits, north of the Kingsburg Business Park (Avenue 13 and Ventura Court) and Southwest of Highway 99. There are several Kingsburg Business Park lots and a ponding basin to the south of the property.

The Kingsburg General Plan designation for the property is Highway Commercial, and the subject property is in the Kingsburg Sphere of Influence (SOI). This reorganization is consistent with the Kingsburg General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as set forth in the Kingsburg Municipal Code. It is also consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Fresno and the City of Kingsburg. The Memorandum of Understanding addresses the annexation of property out of the County of Fresno and into the City of Kingsburg and real property tax sharing issues related to the annexation of property into the City of Kingsburg. Staff performed an Initial Environmental Study (Attachment A) and determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration includes a Mitigation Monitoring Program as Attachment B for reference which addresses the mitigations required to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In 2021, the property owner and the City began discussions about the potential annexation of the property into the City and prezoning the property to Highway Commercial. A potential ‘project’ was needed as part of the annexation application with Fresno LAFCo as the County, as part of the Memorandum of Understanding with Kingsburg, requires a potential use/project to be represented as 25% of the property under consideration. The City and the property owner agreed that there were mutual benefits in working together to facilitate the annexation. At the Council meeting of August 8, 2022, a staff report addressing an Agreement to Develop Vacant Land was presented to Council for their review, and the following benefits for the landowner and the City were identified:

Property Owner Benefits:

Meeting Date: 02/21/2024
Agenda Item: 6.1

Page 2 of 4 ends

1. Extension of road right-of-way, sewer, water, and ancillary utilities from Avenue B. The costs for this infrastructure would be borne by the City.

2. Annexation of the property into the City and prezoning the property to highway commercial. The annexation process would be initiated by the City.

3. Tax benefit of donation of a three (3) acre portion of the property to the City.

City Benefits:

1. Landowner donates three (3) acres of the property to the City for future use, including the potential construction of a new City Hall/Council Chamber facility.

2. Ten (10) acres of commercial property with highway frontage available for development, with the potential property tax/sales tax benefits for the City. The ten (10) acres will remain owned by the landowner.

3. Use of a Restrictive Covenant to control future use and development of the remaining ten (10) acres.

After approval and execution of the Agreement to Develop Vacant Land and related documents, Staff was directed to initiate the annexation process. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment A) was prepared and was circulated and released for the required public comment period. The review period (From November 15 to December 14, 2023) is now completed, and the City has received one comment letter on the project, from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Attachment C). This comment letter would not necessitate revisions to the Initial Study, and the Initial Study addresses areawide analysis of air quality issues. Any future project proposed for the property will be subject to further environmental assessment, including air quality impacts during and after construction.

At the Planning Commission hearing of January 11, 2024 and after a duly noticed public hearing on the project, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the approval of Annexation 2024-01, the Pre-Zone 2024- 01 and recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration dated November 2023 prepared for the annexation and pre-zone.

DISCUSSION
Reorganization
This City-sponsored action is proposing to annex the subject property from the County of Fresno into the City of Kingsburg. The site contains 13.18 acres and the reorganization will be known as the Matoian Reorganization.

Because the property is located within Kingsburg’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) and there is a proposal to convert an agricultural use to other uses, the City will seek approval (a finding) from Fresno County that the proposed reorganization is consistent with the City of Kingsburg/Fresno County Memorandum of Understanding.

The reorganization also includes the detachment of the property from the Fresno County Fire Protection District, Consolidated Irrigation District, and the Kings River Conservation District.

The property is contiguous to the City limits on the east and south side of the parcel, hence no “county island” will be created by the annexation.

The approval of the reorganization by Fresno LAFCo must be consistent with the City’s General Plan, ordinances and policies, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Kingsburg and the County of Fresno and other relevant documents and Fresno LAFCo policies and procedures. This reorganization meets all the requirements of the City and of Fresno LAFCo. A pre-application meeting was held with Fresno LAFCo Staff to discuss the reorganization and Fresno LAFCo Staff found that all initial reorganization requirements have been met.

Pre-Zone 2024-01 (AE-20 to Highway Commercial)
The property must be rezoned consistent with the land use designation as consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The property is currently in the County, with an AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural) Designation. The Kingsburg SOI and the City’s General Plan gives the property a zoning designation of Highway Commercial.

Page 3 of 4 ends

The City of Kingsburg Municipal Code Section 17.88.070 requires that the Planning Commission make findings as to whether the Pre-Zoning of the property will achieve the objectives set forth in Section 17.04.020, Purposes and Objectives of the Code. The objectives in Section 17.04.020 are the following:

A. To provide a zone plan to guide the physical development of the City in such a manner as to achieve progressively the general arrangement of land uses described and depicted in the general plan.

B. To foster a wholesome, serviceable and attractive living environment, the beneficial development of areas which exhibit conflicting patterns of use, and the stability of existing land uses which conform with objectives, policies, principles and standards of the general plan.

C. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of land with structures.

D. To promote a safe, effective traffic circulation system, the provision of adequate off-street parking and truck loading facilities, and the appropriate location of community facilities.

E. To protect and promote appropriately located commercial and industrial activities in order to preserve and strengthen the City's economic base.

F. To protect and enhance property values and the City's natural assets.

G. To ensure unimpeded development of such new urban expansion that is logical, desirable and in conformance with objectives and policies of the general plan.

H. To provide and protect open space in accordance with policies of the open space element of the general plan, including avoiding the premature development of prime agricultural lands.

At the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on January 11, 2024, the Planning Commission found that the proposed Pre-Zoning of the territory to Highway Commercial (CH) satisfied all the objectives identified in Section 17.04.020 of the Kingsburg Municipal Code (Attachment D). The proposed Pre-Zoning is also consistent with the City of Kingsburg General Plan.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City hired a CEQA consultant for this reorganization. The consultant prepared an Initial Study which recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Potential impacts identified by the Initial Study included biological resources, geology/soils, cultural resources, and tribal cultural resources. The Initial Study determined that the reorganization, with incorporation of mitigation measures, would have a less than significant effect on the environment. The potential for impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, and tribal cultural tribal resources from the implementation of the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures1.

A Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published in The Business Journal on November 15, 2023, inviting the public to review and/or comment on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. The comment period closed on December 14, 2023. One comment was received during the comment period (Attachment C).

A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP, Attachment B) has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the City of Kingsburg’s Matoian Reorganization. The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements as well as conditions recommended by responsible agencies who commented on the project2.
1 Initial Study, Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project, p.4-54 2 Initial Study, Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project, p. 5-1, Table 5-1

Page 4 of 4 ends

Site Plan
Although the City Council does not review site plan because under the Zoning Ordinance these types of applications are processed administratively, staff is providing the Council with the parcel map/site plan as background information (Attachment F). This parcel map is conceptual at this point, and any future proposed development may involve revisions to the proposed parcel map. Any proposal will have to be reviewed and will require a corresponding environmental assessment for any proposed development.

RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL

1. That the City Council adopt Resolution 2024-009.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Council could choose to provide alternative direction to staff or to not approve moving forward with this proposal.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION/KEY METRIC

1. Preserve the Kingsburg Experience.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ATTACHED INFORMATION

1. Attachment A – Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

2. Attachment B- Mitigation Monitoring Program

3. Attachment C-Comment Letter from SYVAPCD December 14, 2023

4. Attachment D-Planning Commission Resolution 2024-01

5. Attachment E-Location Map

6. Attachment F-Draft Parcel Map for Project

7. Resolution 2024-009
FISCAL IMPACT:

1. Is There A Fiscal Impact? Yes

2. Is it Currently Budgeted? No

3. If Budgeted, Which Line? N/A
KINGSBURG 13-ACRE PARCEL

ANNEXATION

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION
NOVEMBER 2023
PREPARED FOR:

City of Kingsburg
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA, 93631
PREPARED BY:

Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Regulatory Information ....................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Document Format ............................................................................................................................1-1 Chapter 2 Project Description ....................................................................................................................2-1

2.1 Project Background ..........................................................................................................................2-1

2.1.1 Project Title..............................................................................................................2-1

2.1.2 Lead Agency Name and Address..............................................................................2-1

2.1.3 Contact Person and Phone Number.........................................................................2-1

2.1.4 Project Location .......................................................................................................2-1

2.1.5 General Plan Designation and Zoning ......................................................................2-1

2.1.6 Description of Project ..............................................................................................2-1

2.1.7 Site and Surrounding Land Uses and Setting............................................................2-2

2.1.8 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May Be Required.......................................2-2

2.1.9 Consultation with California Native American Tribes...............................................2-2 Chapter 3 Determination ...........................................................................................................................3-1

3.1 Potential Environmental Impacts.....................................................................................................3-1

3.2 Determination ..................................................................................................................................3-2 Chapter 4 Environmental Impact Analysis..................................................................................................4-1

4.1 Aesthetics.........................................................................................................................................4-1

4.1.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................4-1

4.1.2 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................4-2

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................................4-4

4.2.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................4-4

4.2.2 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................4-6

4.3 Air Quality.........................................................................................................................................4-8

4.3.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................4-8

4.3.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-12

4.4 Biological Resources.......................................................................................................................4-14

4.4.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-14

4.4.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-15

4.4.3 Mitigation...............................................................................................................4-16

4.5 Cultural Resources..........................................................................................................................4-17 Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 ii

4.5.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-17

4.5.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-17

4.5.3 Mitigation...............................................................................................................4-18

4.6 Energy.............................................................................................................................................4-19

4.6.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-19

4.6.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-19

4.7 Geology and Soils ...........................................................................................................................4-21

4.7.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-21

4.7.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-22

4.7.3 Mitigation...............................................................................................................4-24

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................................................................4-25

4.8.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-25

4.8.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-26

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..................................................................................................4-28

4.9.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-28

4.9.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-29

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .......................................................................................................4-31

4.10.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-31

4.10.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-34

4.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................................4-36

4.11.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-36

4.11.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-36

4.12 Mineral Resources........................................................................................................................4-37

4.12.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-37

4.12.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-37

4.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................................4-39

4.13.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-39

4.13.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-39

4.14 Population and Housing ...............................................................................................................4-41

4.14.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-41

4.14.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-41

4.15 Public Services..............................................................................................................................4-42

4.15.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-42

4.15.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-43

4.16 Recreation ....................................................................................................................................4-45 Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 iii

4.16.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-45

4.16.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-45

4.17 Transportation..............................................................................................................................4-46

4.17.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-46

4.17.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-46

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources..............................................................................................................4-48

4.18.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-48

4.18.2 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................4-49

4.18.3 Mitigation...............................................................................................................4-49

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems........................................................................................................4-50

4.19.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-50

4.19.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-50

4.20 Wildfire.........................................................................................................................................4-52

4.20.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................4-52

4.20.2 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................4-52

4.21 CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance....................................................................................4-54

4.21.1 Statement of Findings............................................................................................4-54 Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program .......................................................................5-1 Chapter 6 References.................................................................................................................................6-1

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: CalEEMod Output Files..............................................................................................................1 Appendix B: Biological Resources..................................................................................................................1 Appendix C: Cultural Resources.....................................................................................................................1 Appendix D: Natural Resources Conservation Service...................................................................................1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Regional Vicinity Map...............................................................................................................2-4 Figure 2-2: Aerial Map................................................................................................................................2-5 Figure 2-3: Topo Quad................................................................................................................................2-6 Figure 2-4: General Plan Land Use Designation Map .................................................................................2-7 Figure 2-5: Existing Zoning Map .................................................................................................................2-8 Figure 2-6: Prezone Map............................................................................................................................2-9 Figure 2-7: Parcel Map .............................................................................................................................2-10 Figure 2-8: Site Plan..................................................................................................................................2-11 Figure 4-1: Farmland Designation Map ......................................................................................................4-5 Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 iv
Figure 4-2: FEMA Flood Zone Map...........................................................................................................4-33

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Existing Uses, General Plan Designation, & Zone Districts of Surrounding Properties ............2-2 Table 4-1: Aesthetics Impacts.....................................................................................................................4-1 Table 4-2: Agriculture and Forest Impacts .................................................................................................4-4 Table 4-3: Air Quality Impacts....................................................................................................................4-8 Table 4-4: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Designation ..............................4-10 Table 4-5: Project-Level Air Quality CEQA Thresholds of Significance......................................................4-11 Table 4-6: Unmitigated Short-Term Construction Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants..........4-12 Table 4-7: Unmitigated Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants.............4-12 Table 4-8: Maximum Daily Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants................................................................4-12 Table 4-9: Biological Resources Impacts...................................................................................................4-14 Table 4-10: Cultural Resources Impacts...................................................................................................4-17 Table 4-11: Energy Impacts......................................................................................................................4-19 Table 4-12: Geology and Soils Impacts.....................................................................................................4-21 Table 4-13: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts......................................................................................4-25 Table 4-14: Short Term Construction Related GHG Emissions.................................................................4-27 Table 4-15: Long Term Operational Related GHG Emissions....................................................................4-27 Table 4-16: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts............................................................................4-28 Table 4-17: Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts...................................................................................4-31 Table 4-18: Land Use and Planning Impacts.............................................................................................4-36 Table 4-19: Mineral Resources Impacts ...................................................................................................4-37 Table 4-20: Noise Impacts........................................................................................................................4-39 Table 4-21: Population and Housing Impacts...........................................................................................4-41 Table 4-22: Public Services.......................................................................................................................4-42 Table 4-23: Recreation Impacts................................................................................................................4-45 Table 4-24: Transportation Impacts.........................................................................................................4-46 Table 4-25: Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts .........................................................................................4-48 Table 4-26: Utilities and Service Systems Impacts....................................................................................4-50 Table 4-27: Wildfire Impacts ....................................................................................................................4-52 Table 4-28: CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance.............................................................................4-54 Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program.......................................................................5-2 Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 i

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AB ........................................................................................................................................... Assembly Bill APN .......................................................................................................................Assessor’s Parcel Number BPS .................................................................................................................. Best Performance Standards BMP ................................................................................................................... Best Management Practices CalEEMod ...................................................................... California Emissions Estimator Modeling (software) CARB................................................................................................................California Air Resources Board CALFIRE...................................................................... California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CCAA........................................................................................................................... California Clean Air Act CEQA .....................................................................................................California Environmental Quality Act CFCs ...............................................................................................................................Cholorfluorocarbons City ..................................................................................................................................... City of Kingsburg CGS ....................................................................................................................California Geological Survey CH4 ................................................................................................................................................. Methane CHRIS.............................................................................. California Historical Resources Information System CO ................................................................................................................................. Carbone Monoxide CO2 ........................................................................................................................................Carbon dioxide CO2e.................................................................................................................... Carbon Dioxide Equivelents County ......................................................................................................................................Fresno County DOC .................................................................................................................. Department of Conservation DTSC ............................................................................................... Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR .................................................................................................................Environmental Impact Report FEMA............................................................................................. Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG ......................................................................................................................................Greenhouse Gas GSA ........................................................................................................Groundwater Sustainability Agency GWP .......................................................................................................................Global Warming Potential HFCs ................................................................................................................................Hydrofluorocarbons IS ............................................................................................................................................. Initial Study IS/MND......................................................................................Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration km ............................................................................................................................................... kilometers MMRP.................................................................................... Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MND..............................................................................................................Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 ii
MRZ ......................................................................................................................... Mineral Resource Zones MT CO2e.......................................................................................... Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide Equivelents N2O ..........................................................................................................................................Nitrous Oxide NAHC................................................................................................. Native American Heritage Commission ND ...............................................................................................................................Negative Declaration NO2 .....................................................................................................................................Nitrogen Dioxide NOx ...................................................................................................................................... Nitrogen Oxides NRHP ....................................................................................................... National Register of Historic Places O3 ......................................................................................................................................................Ozone Pb ........................................................................................................................................................ Lead PFCs .................................................................................................................................... Perfluorocarbons PG&E ..............................................................................................................Pacific Gas & Electric Company PM10 ..................................................................................................... particulate matter 10 microns in size PM2.5 ................................................................................................... particulate matter 2.5 microns in size ppb .......................................................................................................................................parts per billion ppm ......................................................................................................................................parts per million Project......................................................................................Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project QSD ................................................................................................................Qualified Sediment Developer QSP ................................................................................................................Qualified Sediment Practioner ROG ...........................................................................................................................Reactive Organic Gases SHPO.......................................................................................................State Office of Historic Preservation SJVAB...................................................................................................................San Joaquin Valley Air Basin SJVAPCD ...............................................................................San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SKFCSD ............................................................................ Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District SO2 ..........................................................................................................................................Sulfur Dioxide SSJVIC ................................................................................. Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center SRA ........................................................................................................................ State Responsibility Area CARB................................................................................................................California Air Resources Board SWPPP............................................................................................... Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB................................................................................................. State Water Resources Control Board USEPA..................................................................................United States Environmental Protection Agency UST .....................................................................................................................Underground Storage Tank VMT ............................................................................................................................ Vehicle Miles Traveled μg/m3.................................................................................................................micrograms per cubic meter Chapter 1: Introduction
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 1-1
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (Provost & Pritchard) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) on behalf of The City of Kingsburg (City) to address the environmental effects of the Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project (Project). This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. The City is the CEQA lead agency for this Project.

The site and the Project are described in detail in Chapter 2 Project Description.

1.1 REGULATORY INFORMATION
An Initial Study (IS) is a document prepared by a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. In accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 14 (Chapter 3, Section 15000, et seq.)-- also known as the CEQA Guidelines--Section 15064 (a)(1) states that an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared if there is substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Project under review may have a significant effect on the environment and should be further analyzed to determine mitigation measures or project alternatives that might avoid or reduce project impacts to less than significant levels. A negative declaration (ND) may be prepared instead if the lead agency finds that there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. An ND is a written statement describing the reasons why a proposed Project, not otherwise exempt from CEQA, would not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, why it would not require the preparation of an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15371). According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, a ND or mitigated ND shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when either:
a. The IS shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment, or b. The IS identified potentially significant effects, but:

1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed MND and IS is released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur is prepared, and

2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the proposed Project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.

1.2 DOCUMENT FORMAT
This IS/MND contains six chapters. Chapter 1 Introduction, provides an overview of the Project and the CEQA process. Chapter 2 Project Description, provides a detailed description of proposed Project components and objectives. Chapter 3 Determination, the Lead Agency’s determination based upon this initial evaluation. Chapter 4 Environmental Impact Analysis presents the CEQA checklist and environmental analysis for all impact areas, mandatory findings of significance, and feasible mitigation measures. If the Project does not have the potential to significantly impact a given issue area, the relevant section provides a brief discussion of the reasons why no impacts are expected. If the Project could have a potentially significant impact on a resource, the issue area discussion provides a description of potential impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures and/or permit requirements that would reduce those impacts to a less than significant level. Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP), provides the Chapter 1: Introduction
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 1-2
proposed mitigation measures, implementation timelines, and the entity/agency responsible for ensuring implementation. Chapter 6 References details the documents and reports this document relies upon to provide its analysis.

The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model, Biological Resources Information, Cultural Resources Information, and Soils Information are provided as technical Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, and Appendix D respectively, at the end of this document.

Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-1
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

2.1.1 Project Title
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project

2.1.2 Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Kingsburg
1401 Draper Street
Kingsburg, CA, 93631

2.1.3 Contact Person and Phone Number
Lead Agency Contact
Holly Owen
Community Development Director
(559) 897-5328
CEQA Consultant
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski, Project Manager
(559) 449-2700

2.1.4 Project Location
The Project is located in Fresno County, California, approximately 176 miles southeast of Sacramento and 85 miles northwest of Bakersfield (see Figure 2-1). The Project site is located on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 394-042-04. The centroid of the Project site is 36° 31’ 22” N, 119° 34’ 9” W.

2.1.5 General Plan Designation and Zoning
The Project site is designated Highway Commercial by the City’s General Plan and is currently zoned Exclusive Agriculture (20 acres) by the County of Fresno (County). 1 2

2.1.6 Description of Project
The City of Kingsburg has proposed the construction of an approximately 18,500 square foot (sqft) office building on APN 394-042-04 (Project Site). APN 394-042-04 is approximately 13.18 acres in size and is generally located north of the intersection of Avenue B and Ventura Court in the County of Fresno. The 1 (City of Kingsburg 2014)
2 (County of Fresno 2023)
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-2
Project site is designated as Highway Commercial under the City’s General Plan. In order for the proposed building to be constructed on this site, the City of Kingsburg has proposed the annexation and prezoning of APN 394-042-04. In accordance with the site’s General Plan Land Use designation, the entire site would be prezoned to the Highway Commercial zone district. Additionally, the City has proposed a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the Project site into four smaller parcels. Parcel 1 would be 0.65 acres in size, Parcel 2 would be 2.13 acres in size, Parcel 3 would be 10.3 acres in size, and Parcel 4 would be 0.11 acres in size (total acreages may differ due to rounding). The proposed public facilities office building would be constructed on Parcel 2. Public facilities are an allowed use within the Highway Commercial zone district.

Construction activities proposed on the site would be subject to the approval of a Site Plan Review. No development is proposed on Parcel 1, 3, or 4 at this time. Any future development of these parcels would require separate, future environmental analysis. Construction of the Project would involve grading, paving, building construction, and painting. As a part of the Project, Avenue B would be extended, providing access to the Project site. Principal deliveries to the Project site would include construction equipment, concrete and asphalt materials, building materials, and any additional hardware required to construct the Project.

2.1.7 Site and Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Table 2-1: Existing Uses, General Plan Designation, & Zone Districts of Surrounding Properties3 4 5 Direction from Project
Site
Existing Use General Plan Designation Zone District
NORTH State Route 99 - -
EAST Vacant Highway Commercial Highway Commercial
SOUTH Commercial Businesses Highway Commercial Highway Commercial WEST Agriculture Agriculture/Open Space
(County)
Exclusive Agriculture
(County)

2.1.8 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May Be Required • County of Fresno
• Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

2.1.9 Consultation with California Native American Tribes Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, et seq. ((codification of Assembly Bill (AB) 52, 2013-14)) requires that a lead agency, within 14 days of determining that it will undertake a project, must notify in writing any California Native American Tribe traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project if that Tribe has previously requested notification about projects in that geographic area. The notice must briefly describe the project and inquire whether the Tribe wishes to initiate request formal consultation. Tribes have 30 days from receipt of notification to request formal consultation. The lead agency then has 30 days to initiate the consultation, which then continues until the parties come to an agreement regarding necessary mitigation or agree that no mitigation is needed, or one or both parties determine that negotiation occurred in good faith, but no agreement will be made. 3 (City of Kingsburg 2014)
4 (County of Fresno 2023)
5 (City of Kingsburg 2018)
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-3
The City of Kingsburg has not received any written correspondence from a Tribe pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 requesting notification of proposed projects.

Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-4
Figure 2-1: Regional Vicinity Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-5
Figure 2-2: Aerial Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-6
Figure 2-3: Topo Quad
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-7
Figure 2-4: General Plan Land Use Designation Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-8
Figure 2-5: Existing Zoning Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-9
Figure 2-6: Prezone Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-10
Figure 2-7: Parcel Map
Chapter 2: Project Description
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 2-11
Figure 2-8: Site Plan
Chapter 3: Determination
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 3-1
CHAPTER 3 DETERMINATION

3.1 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
As indicated by the discussions of existing and baseline conditions, and impact analyses that follow in this Chapter, environmental factors not checked below would have no impacts or less than significant impacts resulting from the project. Environmental factors that are. checked below would have potentially significant impacts resulting from the project. Mitigation measures are recommended for each of the potentially significant impacts that would reduce the impact to less than significant.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
The analyses of environmental impacts in Chapter 4 Impact Analysis result in an impact statement, which shall have the following meanings.

Potentially Significant Impact. This category is applicable if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant, and no feasible mitigation measures can be identified to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. This category applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce an effect from a “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measure(s), and briefly explain how they would reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced).

Less than Significant Impact. This category is identified when the proposed Project would result in impacts below the threshold of significance, and no mitigation measures are required.

No Impact. This category applies when a project would not create an impact in the specific environmental issue area. “No Impact” answers do not require a detailed explanation if they are adequately supported by the information sources cited by the lead agency, which show that the impact does not apply to the specific project (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

Chapter 3: Determination
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project

3.2 DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation (to be completed by the Lead Agency) X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.

An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
lfind that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NE VE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated antto that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures are i osed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Date
ly Owe mmunity Development Director
Printed Name/Position
p
I I
re
November 2023 3-2
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-1
CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

ANALYSIS

4.1 AESTHETICS
Table 4-1: Aesthetics Impacts
Except as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Have substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?

4.1.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located adjacent to the City of Kingsburg within Fresno County. The site is surrounded by commercial uses to the south, agricultural land to the west, State Route (SR) 99 to the north, and vacant land to the east. The Kingsburg General Plan does not list any specific scenic vistas, nor does the Fresno County General Plan Background Report identify one within the vicinity of the Project site.6 Agriculture and views of the Sierra Nevada Mountains are generally regarded as a scenic resource within Fresno County.

Additionally, within Fresno County the SR 99 corridor is an area in which aesthetically pleasing development is emphasized through the Highway 99 Beautification Master Plan.7 This document encourages the development of areas along SR 99 to be held to a higher standard in terms of image and consistency with the existing themes of each city in Fresno County (Kingsburg Swedish style architecture). Development standards for new development within Kingsburg is regulated by the City’s zoning ordinance. The City has also adopted a Highway Beautification Overlay District within its zoning ordinance, providing for additional 6 (County of Fresno 2000)
7 (Association for the Beautification of Highway 99 2016) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-2
development standards for projects within the overlay district boundaries. The Project site is located within this overlay district.

4.1.2 Impact Analysis
a) Have substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building on an undeveloped and vacant parcel. As mentioned above, the City and County have not designated any scenic vistas on or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Agriculture and views of the Sierra Nevada Mountains are generally regarded as resources of aesthetic value within the County. While the Project site has historically been used for agriculture, it is currently vacant and is not currently in use for agricultural purposes. Additionally, while a new building could obstruct views in the immediate area, there are no homes or businesses whose viewshed would be impacted by the proposed building. The Project would also result in a permitted use to be constructed on land planned for commercial development. As a result, development of the parcel has previously been contemplated within the City’s General Plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The Project would not be located on or in the vicinity of a State scenic highway. The nearest officially designated State scenic highway is SR 180, located approximately 15.7 miles to the northeast of the Project site. The Project would be located within the Highway 99 Beautification Area, where City development standards more strictly enforce building and landscaping character.8 The Project would be required to comply with all development standards of the Highway 99 Beautification Area. Therefore, there would be no impact.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage points). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
No Impact. The Project would result in the annexation and prezoning of a parcel for the City of Kingsburg.

Subsequent to these actions, construction of the proposed office building would be required to meet all applicable City development standards, including those of the Highway 99 Beautification Area. The Project is required to meet all local regulations governing scenic resources. Therefore, there would be no impact.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of an approximately 18,500 sqft office building which would introduce new sources of light and glare to the undeveloped site. The Project would result in the construction of this building in an area planned for commercial development. The Project would be constructed in an existing commercial area with other existing sources of light and glare.

While the Project would add to lighting and glare within the area, a review and approval of a lighting plan 8 (City of Kingsburg 2018)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-3
by the City Engineer and Community Development Director would be required prior to construction of the Project. This would ensure that any potential lighting and glare impacts would be minimized.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-4

4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
Table 4-2: Agriculture and Forest Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?

4.2.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is currently located in Fresno County, northwest of the City of Kingsburg. Fresno County and the larger San Joaquin Valley as a whole is one of the largest producers of agricultural products in the world and relies on its agricultural industry to support the regional economy. The Project site has historically been used for agricultural production however is currently vacant. While in production, temporary, nonpermanent buildings supported the agricultural use on site, however these have since been removed.

The California Department of Conservation (DOC) identifies the entire site as land that is Prime Farmland.9 No Williamson Act exists on the site.
9 (California Department of Conservation 2022)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-5
Figure 4-1: Farmland Designation Map
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-6

4.2.2 Impact Analysis
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less than Significant Impact. According to the DOC, the Project site is designated as Prime Farmland (see Figure 4-1). The Project would result in the conversion of this land to a non-agricultural use which would constitute a significant environmental impact under CEQA. While the Project would result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, the City of Kingsburg General Plan and EIR acknowledges that significant environmental impacts would result from the buildout of the General Plan and the conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses. Within this acknowledgement, the General Plan and EIR states that if approved, the approving body would be required to make a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093.10 The General Plan and EIR was adopted in July of 1992, at which time a Statement of Overriding Considerations would have been adopted, identifying that buildout of the General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to agricultural resources due to future development under the General Plan, but that the benefits of the future buildout of the site outweigh the impacts to agricultural resources on-site. Additionally, the Project site was included in a General Plan Amendment in 1996 for which an EIR was prepared.11 The General Plan Amendment redesignated the site’s land use from Highway Commercial Reserve to Highway Commercial. This EIR recognized that future development of the land being redesignated would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to agricultural resources. The Kingsburg City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this action on December 11th, 1996, again recognizing that the future buildout of the site would provide a benefit to the City that would outweigh the impacts on agricultural resources that would result. For this reason, conversion and the ultimate development of the Project site to a non-agricultural use would not be considered a significant impact for this Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is zoned Exclusive Agriculture by the County of Fresno. The Project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. While the Project would result in the conversion of land zoned for agriculture to a commercial zone district, the prezoning of the site to Highway Commercial promotes consistency with the site’s General Plan designation. As a result, the City’s previously conducted analysis has already contemplated the conversion of the site from an agricultural use within the County to a commercial use within the City. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The site is currently zoned Exclusive Agriculture by the County and would be prezoned Highway Commercial as a part of the Project. Additionally, the site 10 (City of Kingsburg 1992)
11 Information derived from City of Kingsburg Resolution 96-52 and correspondence with City staff.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-7
is currently vacant and undeveloped. No forest or timberland exists on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use. The site is a vacant and undeveloped property, adjacent to urban uses. The site is planned for commercial use by the Kingsburg General Plan. Therefore, there would be no impact. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, would result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped and does not currently contain agriculture or forest lands. As discussed above, the Project would result in the loss of Prime Farmland and the conversion of the site from a County agricultural zoning designation to a City commercial zoning designation. Due to its consistency with the adopted General Plan and EIR, these would not be considered significant for this Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-8

4.3 AIR QUALITY
Table 4-3: Air Quality Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under
an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

4.3.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located within the boundaries of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) and the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The SJVAB is positioned within the San Joaquin Valley of California. The San Joaquin Valley is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range to the east and the Coastal Mountain Range to the west. Wind within the SJVAB typically channels south-southwest during the summer months, while wind flows to the north-northwest during the winter months. Wind velocity for the region is considered low for an area of such size.12 Due to a lack of strong wind and the natural confinement of the mountain ranges surrounding the SJVAB, the region experiences some of the worst air quality in the world.

Regulatory Attainment Designations
Under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is required to designate areas of the State as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified with respect to applicable standards. An “attainment” designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations did not violate the applicable standard in that area. A “nonattainment” designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the applicable standard at least once, excluding those occasions when a violation was caused by an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. Depending on the frequency and severity of pollutants exceeding applicable standards, the nonattainment designation can be further classified as serious nonattainment, severe nonattainment, or extreme nonattainment, with extreme nonattainment being the most severe of the classifications. An “unclassified” designation signifies that the data does not support either an attainment or nonattainment designation. The CCAA divides districts into moderate, serious, and severe air pollution categories, with increasingly stringent control requirements mandated for each category.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) designates areas for ozone, CO, and NO2 as “does not meet the primary standards,” “cannot be classified,” or “better than national standards.” For 12 (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2012) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-9
SO2, areas are designated as “does not meet the primary standards,” “does not meet the secondary standards,” “cannot be classified,” or “better than national standards.” However, the CARB terminology of attainment, nonattainment, and unclassified is more frequently used. The USEPA uses the same subcategories for nonattainment status: serious, severe, and extreme. In 1991, USEPA assigned new nonattainment designations to areas that had previously been classified as Group I, II, or III for PM10 based on the likelihood that they would violate national PM10 standards. All other areas are designated “unclassified.”
According to the USEPA Fresno County was not in non-attainment for two pollutant concentrations, with PM-2.5 (2012) being classified as in serious non-attainment, and 8-hour Ozone (2015) classified as being in extreme non-attainment as of October 20th, 2023.
13 13 (United States Environmental Protection Agency 2023) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-10
Table 4-4: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Designation Pollutant
Averaging
Time
California Standards* National Standards*
Concentration*
Attainment
Status
Primary
Attainment
Status
Ozone
(O3)
1-hour 0.09 ppm Nonattainment/
Severe
– No Federal
Standard
8-hour 0.070 ppm Nonattainment 0.075 ppm Nonattainment
(Extreme)**
Particulate
Matter
(PM10)
AAM 20 μg/m3 Nonattainment – Attainment
24-hour 50 μg/m3 150 μg/m3
Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)
AAM 12 μg/m3 Nonattainment 12 μg/m3 Nonattainment
24-hour No Standard 35 μg/m3
Carbon
Monoxide
(CO)
1-hour 20 ppm Attainment/
Unclassified
35 ppm Attainment/
8-hour 9 ppm 9 ppm Unclassified
8-hour
(Lake Tahoe)
6 ppm –
Nitrogen
Dioxide
(NO2)
AAM 0.030 ppm Attainment 53 ppb Attainment/
1-hour 0.18 ppm 100 ppb Unclassified
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
AAM – Attainment -- Attainment/
24-hour 0.04 ppm -- Unclassified
3-hour – 0.5 ppm
1-hour 0.25 ppm 75 ppb
Lead (Pb) 30-day Average 1.5 μg/m3 Attainment – No
Designation/
Classification
Calendar Quarter –
--
Rolling 3-Month
Average
– 0.15 μg/m3
Sulfates (SO4) 24-hour 25 μg/m3 Attainment No Federal Standards Hydrogen
Sulfide (H2S)
1-hour 0.03 ppm
(42 μg/m3)
Unclassified
Vinyl Chloride
(C2H3Cl)
24-hour 0.01 ppm
(26 μg/m3)
Attainment
VisibilityReducing
Particle Matter
8-hour Extinction coefficient:

0.23/km-visibility of
10 miles or more due
to particles when the
relative humidity is
less than 70%.

Unclassified
* For more information on standards visit: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf ** No Federal 1-hour standard. Reclassified extreme nonattainment for the Federal 8-hour standard 10/20/23. ***Secondary Standard
Source: (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2012) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-11
Construction-Generated Emissions
Construction of the Project is assumed to be completed over approximately twelve months. Emissions associated with the Project were calculated using CalEEMod (California Emissions Estimator Model) Air Quality Model, Version 2020.4.0. The emissions modeling includes emissions generated by off-road equipment, haul trucks, and worker commute trips. Emissions were quantified based on anticipated construction schedules and the default parameters contained in the model. Localized air quality impacts associated with the Project would be minor and were qualitatively assessed. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A.

Thresholds of Significance
Air pollutant emissions have regional effects and localized effects. This analysis assesses the regional effects of the Project’s criteria pollutant emissions in comparison to SJVAPCD thresholds of significance for shortterm construction activities and long-term operation of the Project. Localized emissions from Project construction and operation are also assessed using concentration-based thresholds that determine if the Project would result in a localized exceedance of any ambient air quality standards or would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to an existing exceedance.

The primary pollutants of concern during Project construction and operation are ROG (reactive organic gases), NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. The SJVAPCD Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts, adopted in 2015, contains thresholds for ROG and Nitrogen Oxides (NOX); Sulfur Oxides (SOX), CO, PM10, and PM2.5.

Ozone is a secondary pollutant that can be formed miles away from the source of emissions through reactions of ROG and NOX emissions in the presence of sunlight. Therefore, ROG and NOx are termed ozone precursors. The SJVAB often exceeds the state and national ozone standards. Therefore, if the Project emits a substantial quantity of ozone precursors, the Project may contribute to an exceedance of the ozone standard. The SJVAB also exceeds air quality standards for PM10, and PM2.5; therefore, substantial Project emissions may contribute to an exceedance for these pollutants.

The SJVAPCD adopted significance thresholds for construction-related and operational ROG, NOX, PM, CO, and SOX, these thresholds are included in Table 4-5.

Table 4-5: Project-Level Air Quality CEQA Thresholds of Significance Pollutant
Significance Threshold
Construction Emissions (tons/year) Operational Emissions (tons/year) CO 100 100
NOx 10 10
ROG 10 10
SOx 27 27
PM10 15 15
PM2.5 15 15
Source: SJVAPCD. 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. Website:
https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI-2015/FINAL-DRAFT-GAMAQI.PDF. Accessed October 20, 2023.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-12

4.3.2 Impact Analysis
Short-Term Construction-Generated Emissions
Estimated construction-generated emissions are summarized in Table 4-6.

Table 4-6: Unmitigated Short-Term Construction Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Source
Annual Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Annual Project
Construction Emissions

0.3089 1.2978 1.5415 3.1000e0030.0887 0.0575
SJVAPCD Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Long-Term Operational-Generated Emissions
Estimated operational-generated emissions are summarized in Table 4-7.

Table 4-7: Unmitigated Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Source
Annual Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Total Annual Project Operational
Emissions

0.2068 0.1711 0.9026 1.9900e0030.1944 0.0538
SJVAPCD Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Maximum Daily Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants
Daily construction and operational emissions generated by the Project are summarized in Table 4-7.

Table 4-8: Maximum Daily Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Source
Daily Emissions Maximum (in pounds)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Construction – Summer 29.0236 13.8343 15.2163 0.0307 7.7373 3.9733 Construction – Winter 29.0213 13.8372 15.0929 0.0304 7.7373 3.9733 Operational – Summer 1.6050 1.2210 7.2162 0.0161 1.5337 0.4214 Operational – Winter 1.3194 1.3562 7.3478 0.0148 1.5337 0.4214 SJVAPCD Threshold 100 100 100 100 100 100
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan. The proposed Project would not exceed any threshold for air quality emissions that has been set by the SJVAPCD. Therefore, there would be no impact.
b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment. As shown in Table 4-6, Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-13
Table 4-7, and Table 4-8, the Project would not exceed an emissions threshold which has been set by the SJVAPCD for construction or operational related emissions. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the proposed Project would not result in significant long-term operational emissions. Constructed related emissions, shown in Table 4-6 and Table 4-8, would be temporary in nature and would cease upon Project construction. Short-term construction activities, however, could result in temporary increases in pollutant concentrations that could impact nearby sensitive receptors. Sensitive Receptors are groups that would be more affected by air, noise, and light pollution, pesticides, and other toxic chemicals than others. This includes infants, children under 16, elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. High concentrations of these groups would include daycares, residential areas, hospitals, elder care facilities, schools and parks. While the Project would be located in an area near sensitive receptors, such as the residential homes to the north and west and the hotel to the southeast, the Project would not exceed the daily emission thresholds set by the SJVAPCD. Additionally, the HARP2 air dispersion model was run for the Project site to show the health risk the Project would have on sensitive receptors in the area. The model run, which can be viewed in Appendix A, indicates that the Project would result in a cancer risk of

0.0001297 in one million, which is less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of 20 in one million. The Project would also present a chronic risk of 0.00000014586 in one million and an acute risk of 0 in one million, which would be less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of one in one million for both chronic and acute.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than Significant Impact. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust and application of asphalt, structural coating and other construction applications would temporarily emit odors. Construction would be completed within the City of Kingsburg (subsequent to annexation), and could have an effect on some residences that would be located near the construction area of the Project.

Construction of the Project would be temporary, and odors would not remain after Project completion.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-14

4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Table 4-9: Biological Resources Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

4.4.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located on a vacant and undeveloped site within Fresno County that has previously been used for agricultural production. The site abuts both the City of Kingsburg city limits and SR 99. While the site was previously used for agriculture, no vegetation currently exists on-site, outside of naturally occurring weeds. The site is regularly tilled in order to ensure that naturally occurring weeds do not become a blight.

No surface water or canal is located on or within the immediate vicinity of the site. The site is also not located on or near a wetland, according to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.14 According to the 14 (United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2023)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-15
City’s General Plan and EIR the City’s planning area has not been identified to contain any special status species.15

4.4.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is located in an area adjacent to urban uses and has experienced activities that would discourage the occurrence of special status species on-site, such as the use of farming equipment and machinery on-site, and the traffic of SR 99 adjacent to the site. Despite the unlikelihood of special status species occurring on-site, database searches for the Project site indicated that the Fresno Kangaroo Rat, San Joaquin Kit Fox, California Tiger Salamander, Monarch Butterfly, and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp have the potential to be observed on-site (see Appendix B). The City’s General Plan and EIR indicated that no special status species have been observed within the Planning Area. Additionally, the Project site is a vacant field without naturally occurring vegetation (outside of weeds), reducing the likelihood that special status species would be located on-site. Out of an abundance of caution, mitigation measure BIO-1 would be implemented in order to ensure that none of these special status species, and nesting or migratory birds, are located onsite prior to construction activities. This would diminish any potential impacts to a less than significant level.
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The Project site has not been identified as containing riparian habitat or other sensitive natural habitat by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or within local or regional plans policies and regulations.16 17 The site is a vacant and undeveloped parcel which has previously been utilized for agriculture. The site contains a dirt field with naturally occurring weeds as the only vegetation present.

The site is routinely tilled in order to control the growth of naturally occurring weeds. Therefore, there would be no impact.
c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Project site would not be located on or in the immediate vicinity of a federally protected wetland.18 As a result, the Project does not have the potential to impact any federally protected wetlands. Therefore, there would be no impact. 15 (City of Kingsburg 1992)
16 (United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2023)
17 (City of Kingsburg 1992)
18 (United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2023)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-16
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located adjacent to the City of Kingsburg city limits, abutting an existing commercial area. As a part of the Project the site would be annexed into the City.

While the site is vacant and previously undeveloped, it has experienced prior disturbances that would have discouraged the movement of wildlife through the Project site. Such disturbances include the use of the farm equipment and machinery on the site, proximity to urban uses located immediately south of the Project site, and the location of the Project site in proximity to SR 99. SR 99 provides a barrier for movement from the west to the east of this roadway. Additionally, this roadway produces traffic that generates relatively high levels of noise, making it unlikely that a natural wildlife movement corridor would exist in proximity to SR 99. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. The City does not have a tree preservation ordinance and no trees would be removed as part of the Project. The Project would be required to comply with all local policies and regulations protecting biological resources. Therefore, there would be no impact.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. The Project site is located adjacent to the City of Kingsburg and would be annexed to the City as a part of the Project. The site is not currently located within a habitat conservation plan or other type of conservation area. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.4.3 Mitigation
BIO-1 Prior to issuing a grading permit, the developer shall conduct a pre-construction biological survey prepared by a qualified biologist, acceptable to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The survey will be focused on the Fresno Kangaroo Rat, San Joaquin Kit Fox, California Tiger Salamander, Monarch Butterfly, Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp and nesting raptors, and migratory birds. The applicant shall follow any recommendations contained in the survey.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-17

4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Table 4-10: Cultural Resources Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource
pursuant to in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?

4.5.1 Baseline Conditions
Records Search
A records search from the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), located at California State University, Bakersfield was conducted in October of 2023. The SSJVIC records search includes a review of all recorded archaeological and built-environment resources as well as a review of cultural resource reports on file. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, the California Historical Landmarks, the California Register of Historical Resources, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and the California State Built Environment Resources Directory listings were reviewed for the above referenced development site and an additional ¼-mile radius. Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources, archaeological site locations are not released. (Appendix C). Additional sources included the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) Historic Properties Directory, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, and the California Inventory of Historic Resources.

4.5.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in § 15064.5?
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. According to the records search performed by CHRIS staff at California State University Bakersfield, received October 9, 2023, there have been no previous cultural resource studies conducted within the Project area. There have been seven previous cultural resource studies completed within a one half-mile radius: FR-00135, 00669, 00670, 00671, 01940, 02287, & 02452.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-18
There are no recorded resources within the Project area, and it is not known if any exist there. There are three recorded resources within the one-half mile radius: P-10-002966, 003930, & 005812. These resources consist of historic era ditches, and a railroad. Project activities would not have any impacts on these resources.

Resources: P-10-003930, & P-10-005812 have been given California Historical Resource Status codes of 6Y, indicating Determined ineligible for National Register by consensus through Section 106 process – Not evaluated for California Register or local listing. There are no other recorded cultural resources within the Project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks.

While there are no known cultural or archeological resources known to exist on the site, a resource could be uncovered during construction activities. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation measure CUL-1 as outlined below, impacts to archaeological resources that may potentially exist on site would be less than significant.
c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. There is no evidence or record that the Project has the potential to be an unknown burial site or the site of buried human remains. In the unlikely event of such a discovery, incorporation of mitigation measure CUL-2, impacts resulting from the discovery of remains interred on the development site would be less than significant.

4.5.3 Mitigation
CUL-1 Should archaeological remains or artifacts be unearthed during any stage of Project activities, work in the area of discovery shall cease until the area is evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If mitigation is warranted, the Project proponent shall abide by recommendations of the archaeologist.

CUL-2 In the event that any human remains are discovered on the development site, the Fresno County Coroner must be notified of the discovery (California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5) and all activities in the immediate area of the find or in any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains must cease until appropriate and lawful measures have been implemented. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not recent, but rather of Native American origin, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 24 hours to permit the NAHC to determine the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-19

4.6 ENERGY
Table 4-11: Energy Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?

4.6.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located within Fresno County, adjacent to the City of Kingsburg. The Project area is served by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for its natural gas and electricity needs.

4.6.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less than Significant Impact. Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over the course of Project construction. For heavy-duty construction equipment, horsepower and load factor were assumed using default data from the CalEEMod model. Fuel use associated with construction vehicle trips generated by the Project was also estimated; trips include construction worker trips, haul trucks trips for material transport, and vendor trips for construction material deliveries. Fuel use from these vehicles traveling to the Project was based on (1) the projected number of trips the Project would generate (CalEEMod default values), (2) default average trip distance by land use in CalEEMod, and (3) fuel efficiencies estimated in the ARB 2017 Emissions Factors model (EMFAC2017) mobile source emission model.

Construction is estimated to consume a total of 35,656.17 gallons of diesel fuel and 3,415.59 gallons of gasoline fuel (See Appendix A). California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, Section 2449(d)(2), Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel because of unproductive idling of construction equipment. In addition, the energy consumption for construction activities would not be ongoing as they would be limited to the duration of Project construction.

The development’s anticipated annual energy consumption is approximately 183,359.8 kilowatt-hours and 2,390.2 therms of natural gas (see Appendix A). Energy consumption of non-residential uses is currently governed by the 2022 California Building Code, Part 6 for structures, and Title 20 of the California Code of Regulations for appliances. Energy consumption is anticipated to decrease over time Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-20
as more energy efficient standards take effect and energy-consuming equipment reaches its end-of-life and necessitates replacement. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
No Impact. State and local authorities regulate energy use and consumption. These regulations at the State level are intended to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These include, among others, AB 1493 – Light-Duty Vehicle Standards; California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 – Energy Efficiency Standards; and California Code of Regulations Title 24, Parts 6 and 11 – California Energy Code and Green Building Standards. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-21

4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Table 4-12: Geology and Soils Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994) creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of wastewater?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geological feature?

4.7.1 Baseline Conditions
Geology and Soils
According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Web Soil Survey, the Project site is comprised of one soil: the Delhi loamy sand 0-3 percent slope (see Appendix D).

Faults and Seismicity
Like most of California, the Project site experiences seismic activity to a varying degree. The Project area is not located on any known fault or fault zone, but it could experience seismic activity as a result of fault Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-22
activity in other parts of the state. The nearest active fault is the Kern Canyon Fault, approximately 55 miles to the east of the Project site. The San Andreas Fault is located approximately 85 miles to the west of the Project site.19
Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a seismic phenomenon in which loose, saturated granular and non-plastic, fine-grained soils lose their structure or strength when subjected to high-intensity ground shaking. Soil liquefaction causes ground failure that can damage roads, pipelines, underground cables, and buildings with shallow foundations. Liquefaction more commonly occurs in loose, saturated materials. The Project is not known to be an area that experiences liquefaction.

Soil Subsidence
Subsidence occurs below the surface when subsurface pressure is reduced by the withdrawal of fluids (e.g., groundwater, natural gas, oil) resulting in sinking of the ground. While the Central Valley of California is known as an area that has experienced soil subsidence due to groundwater overdraft, the Project is not located in the immediate vicinity of an area that has been subject to subsidence. 20 Dam and Levee Failure
According to the California Department of Water Resources Dam Breach Inundation Map, the Project is not in an area that would be susceptible to flooding as a result of dam or levee failure.21

4.7.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than Significant Impact. Ground shaking intensity is a function of distance from an earthquake’s epicenter and underlying geology. The most common impact associated with ground shaking is damage to structures. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building that would meet California Building Code requirements governing potential structural damage due to earthquakes. The Project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death as a result in a rupture of a known earthquake fault, nor would it result in strong seismic activity from Project inundations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 19 (California Department of Conservation 2015)
20 (United States Geological Survey 2023)
21 (California Department of Water Resources 2023)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-23
No Impact. The Project would not be located in an area that is known to experience liquefaction. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building. The new building would not increase the likelihood for liquefaction to occur within the Project. Therefore, there would be no impact. iv. Landslides?
No Impact. The Project is located in a relatively flat area with little to no potential for landslides to occur.

Construction of the Project would not increase the likelihood for landslides to occur at the Project site.

Therefore, there would be no impact.
b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building on an approximately 2.13-acre site (Parcel 2). Developers whose projects disturb one (1) or more acres of soil or whose projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the Statewide General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation, and construction of linear underground or overhead facilities associated with trail construction but does not include regular maintenance activities performed to restore the original lines, grade, or capacity of the overhead or underground facilities. The Construction General Permit requires the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer. Project construction activities may result in soil erosion and the loss of topsoil, including the buildup of soil in runoff areas. Through the use of a SWPPP and industry Best Management Practices (BMPs), impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No Impact. Due to the relatively flat topography of the Project and greater surrounding area and distance from active faults, landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse are not considered a potentially significant geologic hazard. The Project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or would become unstable during seismic activity. Therefore, there would be no impact. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? No Impact. The Project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building code, creating substantial direct or indirect risks to property or life. The Project site is comprised of loamy sand that is not expansive in nature. Therefore, there would be no impact. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The Project would not result in the use of septic tanks or any alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-24
f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. There are no known unique paleontological resources or geological features on the Project; however, during construction unique paleontological or geological resources could be unearthed. In this event all construction would stop, the City would be notified, and a qualified geologist and/or paleontologist would be consulted. Employment of mitigation measure GEO-1 any potential significant impacts would be lowered to a less than significant level.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

4.7.3 Mitigation
GEO-1 Should a unique paleontological resource, site, or unique geological feature be unearthed during any stage of Project activities, work in the area of discovery will cease until the area is evaluated by a qualified geologist and/or paleontologist. If discoveries are uncovered, the Project proponent will abide by recommendations of the geologist or paleontologist.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-25

4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Table 4-13: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?

4.8.1 Baseline Conditions
Commonly identified GHG emissions and sources include the following:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an odorless, colorless natural greenhouse gas. CO2 is emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources. Natural sources include the following: decomposition of dead organic matter; respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus; evaporation from oceans; and volcanic out gassing. Anthropogenic sources include the burning of coal, oil, natural gas, and wood.

Methane (CH4) is a flammable greenhouse gas. A natural source of methane is the anaerobic decay of organic matter. Geological deposits, known as natural gas fields, also contain methane, which is extracted for fuel. Other sources are from landfills, fermentation of manure, and ruminants such as cattle.

Nitrous oxide (N2O), also known as laughing gas, is a colorless greenhouse gas. Nitrous oxide is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions that occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel-fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load.

Water vapor is the most abundant, and variable greenhouse gas. It is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere, it maintains a climate necessary for life.

Ozone (O3) is known as a photochemical pollutant and is a greenhouse gas; however, unlike other greenhouse gases, ozone in the troposphere is relatively short-lived and, therefore, is not global in nature. O3 is not emitted directly into the atmosphere but is formed by a complex series of chemical reactions between volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and sunlight.

Aerosols are suspensions of particulate matter in a gas emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the earth’s surface). CFCs were first synthesized in 1928 for use as Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-26
refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. CFCs destroy stratospheric ozone; therefore, their production was stopped as required by the Montreal Protocol in 1987.

Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are synthetic chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Of all the greenhouse gases, HFCs are one of three groups (the other two are perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride) with the highest global warming potential. HFCs are human-made for applications such as air conditioners and refrigerants.

Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere; therefore, PFCs have long atmospheric lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacture.

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. It has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection.

There are uncertainties as to exactly what the climate changes will be in various local areas of the earth, and what the effects of clouds will be in determining the rate at which the mean temperature will increase.

There are also uncertainties associated with the magnitude and timing of other consequences of a warmer planet: sea level rise, spread of certain diseases out of their usual geographic range, the effect on agricultural production, water supply, sustainability of ecosystems, increased strength and frequency of storms, extreme heat events, air pollution episodes, and the consequence of these effects on the economy.

Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are largely attributable to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors.

About three-quarters of human emissions of CO2 to the global atmosphere during the past 20 years are due to fossil fuel burning. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O have increased by at least 40 percent, 150 percent, and 20 percent respectively since the year 1750. GHG emissions are typically expressed in carbon dioxide-equivalents (CO2e), based on the GHG’s Global Warming Potential (GWP). The GWP is dependent on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. For example, one ton of CH4 has the same contribution to the greenhouse effect as approximately 25 tons of CO2.

Therefore, CH4 is a much more potent GHG than CO2. In accordance with SJVAPCD’s CEQA Greenhouse Gas Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects22, proposed projects complying with Best Performance Standards (BPS) would be determined to have a less-thansignificant impact. Projects not complying with BPS would be considered less than significant if operational GHG emissions would be reduced or mitigated by a minimum of 29 percent, in comparison to business-asusual (year 2004) conditions. In addition, project-generated emissions complying with an approved plan or mitigation program would also be determined to have a less-than-significant impact.

4.8.2 Impact Analysis
Project Related Emissions
Short-term construction emissions associated with the Project were calculated using CalEEMod, Version 2020.4.0. The emissions modeling includes emissions generated by off-road equipment, haul trucks, and 22 (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2009) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-27
worker commute trips. Emissions were quantified based on an anticipated construction schedule of approximately twelve months. Remaining assumptions were based on the default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A. Estimated constructiongenerated and operational related emissions are summarized in Table 4-14 and Table 4-15. GHGs impact the environment over time as they increase and contribute to climate change.

Table 4-14: Short Term Construction Related GHG Emissions Emissions (MT CO2e) in Tons per
Year
Maximum Annual Construction CO2e Emissions 265.5290
AB 32 Consistency Threshold for Land-Use Development Projects* 1,100 AB 32 Consistency Threshold for Stationary Source Projects* 10,000 Threshold Exceeded? No
* As published in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Available online at http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en Accessed 10/19/2023.

Table 4-15: Long Term Operational Related GHG Emissions Emissions (MT CO2e) in Tons per
Year
Annual Operational CO2e Emissions 227.2875
AB 32 Consistency Threshold for Land-Use Development Projects* 1,100 AB 32 Consistency Threshold for Stationary Source Projects* 10,000 Threshold Exceeded? No
* As published in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Available online at http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en Accessed 10/19/2023.

Construction related generation of GHGs would be a maximum of 265.5290 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MT CO2e) per year, while operational emissions are expected to be 227.2875 MTCO2e per year. The Project would not exceed the AB 32 consistency threshold for land use projects for both short term construction emissions and long-term operational emissions as a result. a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. As shown in Table 4-14 and Table 4-15, the Project is not expected to result in the generation of GHG emissions that would exceed the AB 32 consistency threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e annually during both construction and operational activities.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No Impact. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The Project would be in compliance with all SJVAPCD policies and regulations and would not exceed an applicable threshold for GHG emissions. Therefore, there would be no impacts.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-28

4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Table 4-16: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires?

4.9.1 Baseline Conditions
Hazardous Materials
The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies, and developers to comply with CEQA requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to develop at least annually an updated Cortese List. The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is responsible for a portion of the information contained in the Cortese List. Other State and local government agencies are required to provide additional hazardous material release information for the Cortese List. DTSC’s EnviroStor database provides DTSC’s component of Cortese Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-29
List data (DTSC, 2010). In addition to the EnviroStor database, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker database provides information on regulated hazardous waste facilities in California, including underground storage tank (UST) cases and non-UST cleanup programs, including Spills-LeaksInvestigations-Cleanups sites, Department of Defense sites, and Land Disposal program. A search of the DTSC EnviroStor database and the SWRCB Geotracker performed on October 18, 2023 determined that there are no known active hazardous waste generators or hazardous material spill sites within the Project site or immediate surrounding vicinity.23 24
Airports
The Project is not located within the boundaries of an adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The nearest airport or air strip to the Project is the Selma Airport located approximately six miles to the northwest.

Emergency Response Plan
The City of Kingsburg has an Emergency Services Plan that was adopted in 2010. 25 The Plan addresses risks
to the community such as fire, law enforcement, public health threats, and other risks. An update to the plan is currently underway and should be complete in early 2024.

Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive Receptors are groups that would be more affected by air, noise, and light pollution, pesticides, and other toxic chemicals than others. This includes infants, children under 16, elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. High concentrations of these groups would include, daycares, residential areas, hospitals, elder care facilities, schools and parks. The nearest sensitive receptor to the area in which the construction is proposed is a rural residence approximately 900 feet to the northwest.

4.9.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
a-b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building on land that would be annexed into the City of Kingsburg. During construction, equipment would be used that could result in the spill of hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel, lubricants, and solvents. However, the contractor would comply with all California Department of Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations regarding regular maintenance and inspection of equipment, spill prevention, and spill remediation in order to reduce the potential for incidental release of pollutants or hazardous substances onsite. Furthermore, any potential 23 (California Department of Toxic Substances Control 2023) 24 (State Water Resources Control Board 2023)
25 (City of Kingsburg 2010)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-30
accidental hazardous materials spills during construction are the responsibility of the contractor to remediate in accordance with industry BMPs and State and local regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. The Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed School. No school, public or private, exists within one quarter mile of the Project site, nor is one currently proposed within one quarter mile of the site. Therefore, there would be no impact. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. The Project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As discussed above, a search of the EnviroStor and GeoTracker databases was conducted and the Project area has not been identified to contain a known hazardous material spill. Therefore, there would be no impact. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The Project would not be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or within two miles of a public or private airport where such a plan has not been adopted. The Project is located approximately six miles southeast of the nearest airport, the Selma Airport, and is not located within an adopted airport land use compatibility plan. Therefore, there would be no impact. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The Project, during construction, would result in truck deliveries, however, no detours or road closures are expected to occur as a result of construction activities. In addition, any potential work within existing roadways would be required to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, there would be no impact. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
No Impact. The Project is located adjacent to the City of Kingsburg and would be annexed to the City as a result of the Project. This area is characterized by urban development, where wildland fires are unlikely to occur. The Project is not located within the vicinity of a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or a very high fire hazard severity zone (see Section 4.20, Wildfire). Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-31

4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Table 4-17: Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground
water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i. result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
off-site;
iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?

4.10.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project is located within the San Joaquin Valley Basin and the Kings Subbasin. The site is also located within the boundaries of the of the Central Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA).26 The City of Kingsburg is, for the most part, located within the boundaries of the South Kings GSA. While the Project site is not located in the vicinity of a surface body of water, the site is located within the boundaries of the Fresno County Sole Source Aquifer.27 This aquifer provides for the majority of drinking water for the area, 26 (California Department of Water Resources 2023)
27 (United States Environmental Protection Agency 2023) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-32
making water quality protection increasingly important in the Project area. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Project site is located approximately 1.8 miles from the nearest flood zone (see Figure 4-2).
28 28 (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2023)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-33
Figure 4-2: FEMA Flood Zone Map
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-34

4.10.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality. Construction activities could result in a potential impact through the erosion of soils and the build-up of silt and debris in runoff areas, however under California General Construction Permit 2009-0009-DWQ guidelines implementing a SWPPP, performed and approved by a qualified sediment practitioner (QSP) or a qualified sediment developer (QSD), would be required prior to construction, handling, and transportation of hazardous materials within the Project. In addition, construction activities could result in accidental spills of fuels, paints, and other hazardous materials entering runoff areas. Through a SWPPP carried out by the contractor and a QSP/QSD, the Project would design and utilize BMPs in order to stabilize any sedimentation and erosion from leaving the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of an 18,500 sqft office building on land planned for commercial use by the City’s General Plan. While water would be used by the office building for services such as plumbing, the demand for water is not expected to be substantial. According to the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, which was completed taking into account planned land uses of the General Plan, the City is expected to be in water balance through the year 2040. 29 Because the Project would result in a use that aligns with the site’s General Plan land use designation, the Project would be in line with the analysis provided within the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
i-iv) Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of an office building and associated pavement, resulting in the introduction of impervious surfaces to the Project site. The Project would construct storm drainage infrastructure which would connect to the existing City storm basin 29 (City of Kingsburg 2017)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-35
abutting the Project site to the southwest. The Project site does not contain, nor is it in the immediate vicinity of any naturally occurring surface waters or canals. While construction activities and the introduction of impervious surfaces would result in changes in drainage, connection of the site to the City’s drainage basin would ensure that significant impacts do not occur. Any potential erosion and siltation from construction activities would be controlled on-site by the contractor through the implementation of a SWPPP. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundations?
No Impact. The Project would not in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to Project inundations. The Project is not located within a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone.

Therefore, there would be no impact.
e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No Impact. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. The Project would be located within the boundaries of the Central Kings GSA. The City of Kingsburg is primarily located within the South Kings GSA. Subsequent to annexation of the Project site to the City, the California Department of Water Resources and the two aforementioned GSA’s could agree upon a boundary realignment which would result in the Project site being moved into the South Kings GSA. Both of the two GSA’s have completed their Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The Project would not be in conflict with either plan. Position of the Project site in one GSA or the other could result in a difference in fees due, but would not have a physical impact on the environment. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-36

4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Table 4-18: Land Use and Planning Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Physically divide an established
community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

4.11.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located within the County, adjacent to the City of Kingsburg. The site is within the City’s sphere of influence and is designated Highway Commercial by the City’s General Plan. Additionally, the site is zoned Exclusive Agriculture by the County. As a part of the Project, the site would be annexed into the City and prezoned Highway Commercial consistent with the site’s existing Highway Commercial land use designation.

4.11.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The Project would not physically divide and existing community. As mentioned above, the subject parcel would be annexed to the City from the County. As the Project site is located adjacent to the current city limits, annexation of this parcel would be done in a contiguous manner. In order for the Project to be approved, the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission would be required to approve an application regarding the Project. Furthermore, development proposed as a part of this Project would be completed on a vacant and undeveloped parcel. The City would connect the site to development south of the Project via extension of Avenue B through City owned property. Therefore, there would be no impact.
b) Would the project cause a significant environmental conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The Project would result in the construction of an office building in an area planned for commercial uses. To facilitate the Project, the site would be annexed to the City of Kingsburg and prezoned Highway Commercial to be consistent with the site’s existing Highway Commercial land use designation. These actions further the objectives of the City’s General Plan by providing development in the areas in the City where they are planned for. The Project would be required to meet all applicable City of Kingsburg land use policies and regulations. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-37

4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
Table 4-19: Mineral Resources Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?

4.12.1 Baseline Conditions
The California Geological Survey (CGS) is responsible for the classification and designation of areas within California containing or potentially containing significant mineral resources. The CGS classifies lands into Aggregate and Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs) based on guidelines adopted by the California State Mining and Geologic Board, as mandated by the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. These MRZs identify whether known or inferred significant mineral resources are presented in areas. Lead agencies are required to incorporate identified MRZs resource areas delineated by the state into their general plans.30 According to the CGS Mineral Land Classification map, the Fresno County area, including the Project site, is known to produce aggregate materials.31 The Kingsburg General Plan and the Fresno County General Plan Background Report have not identified the Project site or land in its vicinity as containing mineral resources.32 33 The nearest known mineral producing site (sand and gravel) is along the Kings River, approximately 10.5 miles to the northeast.

4.12.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. The Project site is not known to contain any mineral deposits that would be of value to the region and the State. The Project would not result in the loss of availability of a mineral resource which would be of value to the region or the State. Therefore, there would be no impact. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 30 Public Resources Code, Section 2762(a)(1).
31 (California Geological Survey 2022)
32 (City of Kingsburg 1992)
33 (County of Fresno 2000)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-38
No Impact. The Project site has not been identified as containing a locally important mineral resource by the Kingsburg General Plan, a specific plan, or any other land use plan. The Project would not result in the loss of any locally important mineral resource. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-39

4.13 NOISE
Table 4-20: Noise Impacts
Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise
levels?

4.13.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located within the County of Fresno and would be annexed into the City as a part of the Project. The City of Kingsburg requires that daytime noise sources within commercial areas remain below 65 decibels during the day.
34 The site is located adjacent to an existing commercial area, an agricultural field that is accustomed to heavy machinery use, and SR 99 which produces high levels of noise due to traffic.

4.13.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. During construction, the Project would temporarily utilize equipment that would exceed 65 decibels. While noise levels may temporarily be exceeded during such activities, construction noise would diminish with distance from the source. As a result, construction noise is not anticipated to be significant. Construction noise would also be temporary and cease upon completion. The newly constructed office building would not exceed acceptable noise levels during operation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 34 (City of Kingsburg 1992)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-40
b) Would the project result in generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not result in generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. Like ordinary noise levels, ground borne noise levels diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. Construction activities can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures, and soil type. The generation of vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels.

Given the type of improvements, it is not anticipated the Project would generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. The Project would be required to adhere to all applicable City policies and regulations governing ground borne vibration. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project would not be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or within two miles of a public or private airport where such a plan has not been adopted. The Project is located approximately six miles southeast of the nearest airport, the Selma Airport, and is not located within an adopted airport land use compatibility plan. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-41

4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Table 4-21: Population and Housing Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?

4.14.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site is located within Fresno County and would be annexed into the City of Kingsburg. According to the United States Census Bureau, the County of Fresno had an estimated population of 1,015,190 in 2022, while the City of Kingsburg had an estimated population of 12,613 people in 2022.35

4.14.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
No Impact. The Project would not result in substantial direct or indirect population growth. The Project would result in the annexation of an approximately 13.18-acre parcel to the City of Kingsburg and the construction of an 18,500 sqft office building. The land annexed as a part of the Project is planned for commercial use and would be prezoned accordingly. The newly constructed office building would provide the City with additional space for administrative purposes. As a result, the Project does not have the potential to result in substantial unplanned population growth. Therefore, there would be no impact. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The Project would not displace any existing residents, necessitating them to find shelter elsewhere. The Project site is a vacant and undeveloped parcel without any existing structures. Therefore, there would be no impact.
35 (United States Census Bureau 2023)
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-42

4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
Table 4-22: Public Services
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?

4.15.1 Baseline Conditions
Fire Protection:

The Project would be served by the Kingsburg Fire Department station located approximately 2,100 feet to the southwest of the Project.

Police Protection:

The Project would be served by the Kingsburg Police Department, located approximately 1.1 miles to the southeast of the Project site.

Schools:

Kingsburg Unified School District operates several schools within the City. The nearest public schools to the site are Reagan Elementary School, approximately 3,400 feet to the south, and Rafer Johnson Junior High School, approximately 3,400 feet to the east of the site. The nearest private school facilities to the Project site are Central Valley Home School and Island Community Day School, located approximately 2,800 feet to the southeast of the site.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-43
Parks:

The City of Kingsburg provides parks and open space for the residents of the City. The nearest City owned and operated parks are Athwal Park, approximately 2,800 feet to the south of the Project site, and Kingsburg Dog Park, approximately 2,300 feet to the southeast.

Landfills:

The City of Kingsburg contracts with Mid Valley Disposal for its trash and recycling services.

4.15.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i. Fire Protection:

No Impact. The Project site is located approximately 2,100 from the nearest City of Kingsburg Fire Department station. The service area of this station would remain unchanged with approval of the Project. Therefore, there would be no impact.
ii. Police Protection:

No Impact. The Kingsburg Police Department would provide police protection for the Project once it is annexed to the City. While the site would have been under County jurisdiction prior to annexation, the Kingsburg Police Department would have already responded to calls to the site, as it is the nearest police entity. As a result, the Kingsburg Police Department’s service area would remain unchanged due to the Project. Therefore, there would be no impact.
iii. Schools:

No Impact. The Project would result in the construction of an office building. Substantial population growth which would necessitate new school facilities or increases in school staff is not anticipated as a result of the Project. Therefore, there would be no impact. iv. Parks:

No Impact. The Project does not propose a use that would result in substantial induced population growth. As a result, the usage of existing parks and the demand for new parks is expected to remain unchanged. No additional City staff would be required to maintain parks as a result of this Project.

Therefore, there would be no impact.
v. Other public facilities:

Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the generation of solid waste during construction and operational activities. During construction, waste produced would be the responsibility of the contractor to dispose of. Subsequent to the construction of the 18,500 sqft office building, operations would result in the generation of solid waste, recyclables, and organics. The Project would be required Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-44
to construct a trash enclosure to City standards, allowing for pickup by Mid Valley Disposal. Review by the City Engineer and ultimate approval of the Project during the entitlement process would ensure that generation of waste at the site does not constitute a significant impact. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-45

4.16 RECREATION
Table 4-23: Recreation Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

4.16.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site would be annexed into the City of Kingsburg as a result of the Project. The City of Kingsburg provides parks and open space for the residents of the City. The nearest City owned and operated parks are Athwal Park, approximately 2,800 feet to the south of the Project site, and Kingsburg Dog Park, approximately 2,300 feet to the southeast.

4.16.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The Project would not result in increased usage of existing parks and recreational facilities in a manner such that substantial physical deterioration of such resources would occur. The Project would result in the annexation of a commercially planned parcel of approximately 13.18 acres. The Project would also result in the construction of an 18,500 sqft office building and would not result in substantial population growth that would increase use of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, there would be no impact.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project would not include the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. The Project proposes the construction of an 18,500 sqft office building. No other construction is currently proposed on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-46

4.17 TRANSPORTATION
Table 4-24: Transportation Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?

4.17.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project would result in the annexation of the Project site to the City of Kingsburg. Major transportation routes within the City include SR 99 and SR 201. The Project site is abutted by SR99 to its northeast.

4.17.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project conflict with a plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. While the Project would result in the extension of Avenue B, the Project would be required to adhere to all applicable laws, policies, and plans regarding circulation and transit facilities within the City of Kingsburg. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 subdivision (b)? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the construction of a new City of Kingsburg office building on land that would be annexed into the City and prezoned Highway Commercial in accordance with the City’s General Plan. This analysis relies on a qualitative analysis as permitted by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(3), as models for such land uses are not available. The city facility portion of the Project would have a less than significant impact to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as, in accordance with the Fresno Council of Governments VMT Guidelines:

The development of institutional/government and public service uses that support community health, safety and welfare may also be screened from subsequent CEQA VMT analysis. These facilities (e.g. police stations, fire stations, community centers, refuse stations) are already part of the community and, as a public service, the VMT is accounted for in the existing regional average.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-47
Many of these facilities generate fewer than 500 ADT and/or use vehicles other than passenger cars or light‐duty trucks. These other vehicle fleets are subject to regulation outside of CEQA, such as CARB and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. The local jurisdiction will have the discretion to determine whether such facilities, that provide safety, security, and serve the local communities, can be screened out from the VMT analysis.

The remaining 10.3-acre portion of the site (Parcel 3) has no specific identified use and may not be developed as public facilities in the future. This area is designated by the Kingsburg General Plan as Highway Commercial, which is “limited to business or services that rely on visibility from highways and/or serve the needs of the traveling public and residents of the surrounding agricultural area.” Highway Commercial allows for a site coverage percentage of 60%, or approximately 269,200 square feet of floor area. Commercial land uses in this area as specified rely on visibility from the highway, and thus it is presumed that a significant portion of traffic to these businesses would be “pass-by” trips, where visiting the business is not the primary traveler’s goal. Typical uses, as specified by the General Plan, include motels, restaurants, service stations, regional auto malls, factory outlet shopping centers, RV, boat and mobile home sales, transportation services, and governmental and agricultural services relying on highway access. Furthermore, these uses generally do not encourage additional trips, and therefore VMT, simply because they have been constructed. For example, households do not frequent motels more because more motels exist. These uses simply capture a trip when the highway driver finds it most convenient—at the next highway exit. Therefore, it can be presumed that there would no additional increase in VMT from these highway-visible, pass-by trip generating commercial uses. Additionally, future development of the overall Project site, outside of what is proposed under this Project, would be subject to separate environmental review. Impacts would thus be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. The Project would result in the construction of a new office building on a vacant and undeveloped site. The Project does not propose the construction of a hazardous geometric design feature, nor does it propose an incompatible use for the site. Therefore, there would be no impact. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. The Project would result in the extension of Avenue B to serve the Project site. No complete road closures would be necessary in order for the Project to be developed. The Project would be required to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval, ensuring that access would be maintained. In addition, construction of the Project would be located in an area away from major roadways that would serve as emergency routes.

Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-48

4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Table 4-25: Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of
the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in the local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native
American tribe.

4.18.1 Baseline Conditions
Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, et seq. (codification of AB 52, 2013-14) requires that a lead agency, within 14 days of determining that it will undertake a project, must notify in writing any California Native American Tribe traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project if that Tribe has previously requested notification about projects in that geographic area. The notice must briefly describe the project and inquire whether the Tribe wishes to initiate request formal consultation. Tribes have 30 days from receipt of notification to request formal consultation. The lead agency then has 30 days to initiate the consultation, which then continues until the parties come to an agreement regarding necessary mitigation or agree that no mitigation is needed, or one or both parties determine that negotiation occurred in good faith, but no agreement will be made. Pursuant to PRC Section 21080.3, the City of Kingsburg has not received letters from any tribe requesting notification.

Records Search
A records search from the SSJVIC of the CHRIS, located at California State University, Bakersfield was conducted in October of 2023. The SSJVIC records search includes a review of all recorded archaeological Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-49
and built-environment resources as well as a review of cultural resource reports on file. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, the California Historical Landmarks, the California Register of Historical Resources, the NRHP, and the California State Built Environment Resources Directory listings were reviewed for the above referenced development site and an additional ¼-mile radius. Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources, archaeological site locations are not released. (Appendix C).

Additional sources included the SHPO Historic Properties Directory, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, and the California Inventory of Historic Resources.

4.18.2 Impact Assessment
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in the local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The City of Kingsburg, as the lead agency, has not received a letter any tribal letters pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, et seq. (AB 52) officially requesting notification of any projects. Additionally, a records search of the Project site indicated that there were no known tribal cultural resources on-site. In the unlikely event of a discovery, mitigation will be implemented. With incorporation of mitigation measure CUL-1 and CUL-2 described above in Section 4.5, impacts resulting from the discovery of remains interred on the Project site or the discovery of another tribal cultural resource would be less than significant.

4.18.3 Mitigation
Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-50

4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Table 4-26: Utilities and Service Systems Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

4.19.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site would be annexed to the City of Kingsburg as a part of the Project. The City of Kingsburg is the water and storm drainage provider for residents of the City. The City also contracts with Mid Valley Disposal for solid waste pickup services. The Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District (SKFCSD) is the sewer facilities provider for the City of Kingsburg. PG&E is the natural gas and electricity provider for the area. The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, devoid of existing utility services.

4.19.2 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. Subsequent to annexation to the City of Kingsburg the Project would connect to City infrastructure for water and storm drainage services. The Project would connect to City water services existing in the commercial development to the south. Additionally, the Project would connect to the existing City storm drain basin abutting the Project site to the southwest. For sewer Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-51
services the Project would connect to existing SKFCSD infrastructure located in the commercial development to the south of the Project site. Likewise, the Project would connect to existing PG&E and telecommunications facilities existing in the development immediately south of the site. Utility connections are available within the vicinity of the Project site and no substantial extension of any utility service would be required of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant Impact. According to the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, the City is expected to be in balance of its water budget through the year 2040. The 2015 Urban Water Management Plan was developed taking into account planned land uses contained in the City’s General Plan. Due to the fact that the Project would result in a use that aligns with the site’s existing General Plan land use designation, the Project would align with the 2015 Water Urban Management Plan. Additionally, the operation of an 18,500 sqft office building is not expected to result in substantial demand for water supplies. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would be required to connect to existing SKFCSD facilities. While the Project would include a new sewer connection to serve the proposed office building, the added usage as a result of the Project is not anticipated to be substantial. Review by SKFCSD staff during the entitlement process would ensure that significant environmental impacts do not occur as a result of any new sewer connections. The Project would also be required to file all necessary applications and pay fees to the SKFCSD. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the generation of solid waste during construction and operational activities. During construction, waste produced would be the responsibility of the contractor to dispose of. Subsequent to the construction of the 18,500 sqft office building, operations would result in the generation of solid waste, recyclables, and organics. The Project would be required to construct a trash enclosure to City standards, allowing for pickup by Mid Valley Disposal. Review by the City Engineer and ultimate approval of the Project during the entitlement process would ensure that generation of waste at the site does not constitute a significant impact. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact. The Project would be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-52

4.20 WILDFIRE
Table 4-27: Wildfire Impacts
If located in or near state
responsibility areas or lands classified
as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrollable spread of wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

4.20.1 Baseline Conditions
The Project site would be annexed into the City of Kingsburg as a part of the Project. The City of Kingsburg is served by the Kingsburg Fire Department for fire protection services. The nearest Kingsburg Fire Department station to the Project site is located approximately 2,100 feet to the southwest. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) SRA viewer, the nearest SRA to the Project site is located approximately 17 miles to the northeast.36 Additionally, according to the CALFIRE fire hazard severity map, the Project site is located approximately 22 miles to the southwest of the nearest very high fire hazard severity zone.37

4.20.2 Impact Analysis
a) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby 36 (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2023) 37 (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2023) Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-53
expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? a-d) No Impact. The Project site is located approximately 17 miles from the nearest SRA and 22 miles from the nearest very high fire hazard severity zone. The site is located on a relatively flat, vacant, and undeveloped site that is surrounded by urban uses, making wildfire unlikely to occur at the site. The Project would be served by the Kingsburg Fire Department station located approximately 2,100 feet to the southwest of the site. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-54

4.21 CEQA MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Table 4-28: CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance
Does the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?

4.21.1 Statement of Findings
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The analysis conducted in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration results in a determination that the Project, with incorporation of mitigation measures, would have a less than significant effect on the environment. The potential for impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, and tribal cultural resources from the implementation of the Project would be less than significant with the incorporation of the mitigation measures identified in this analysis. Accordingly, the Project would involve no potential for significant impacts through the degradation of the quality of the environment, the reduction in the habitat or population of fish or wildlife, including endangered plants or animals, the elimination of a plant or animal community or example of a major period of California history or prehistory. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 4-55
Less than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) States that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects. The Project involves the annexation of 13.18 acres into the City and the construction and operation of a new City office building, the effects of which would not result in significant cumulatively considerable impacts. Implementation of the Project would not result in significant cumulative impacts and all potential impacts would be less than significant through the implementation of basic regulatory requirements and Project design. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact. The analysis conducted in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration results in a determination that the Project, would have a less than significant effect on the environment.

All potential impacts to human beings have found to be unsubstantial and would be considered less than significant.

Chapter 5- Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 5-1
CHAPTER 5 MITIGATION,

MONITORING, AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This MMRP has been formulated based upon the findings of the IS/MND for the Project in the City of Kingsburg. The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the Project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements.

Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program presents the mitigation measures identified for the Project. Each mitigation measure is numbered with a symbol indicating the topical section to which it pertains, a hyphen, and the impact number. For example, AIR-2 would be the second mitigation measure identified in the Air Quality analysis of the IS/MND.

The first column of Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “When Monitoring is to Occur,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The third column, “Frequency of Monitoring,” identifies the frequency of the monitoring of the mitigation measure. The fourth column, “Agency Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last columns will be used by the Lead and Responsible Agencies to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been complied with and monitored.

Chapter 5- Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 5-2
Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure When Monitoring is
to Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to
Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
Biological Resources
BIO-1 Prior to issuing a grading permit, the developer
shall conduct a pre-construction biological survey
prepared by a qualified biologist, acceptable to the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The
survey will be focused on the Fresno Kangaroo Rat,
San Joaquin Kit Fox, California Tiger Salamander,
Monarch Butterfly, Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp and
nesting raptors, and migratory birds. The applicant
shall follow any recommendations contained in the
survey.

Prior to construction
activities Daily
City of Kingsburg
and/or construction
contractor
City of
Kingsburg
with
assistance of
a qualified
biologist
Cultural Resources
CUL-1 Should archaeological remains or artifacts be
unearthed during any stage of Project activities,
work in the area of discovery shall cease until the
area is evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If
mitigation is warranted, the Project proponent shall
abide by recommendations of the archaeologist.

During construction
activities Daily
City of Kingsburg
and/or construction
contractor
City of
Kingsburg
with
assistance of
a qualified
archaeologist
CUL-2 In the event that any human remains are
discovered on the development site, the Fresno
County Coroner must be notified of the discovery
(California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5)
and all activities in the immediate area of the find
or in any nearby area reasonably suspected to
overlie adjacent human remains must cease until
appropriate and lawful measures have been
implemented. If the Coroner determines that the
remains are not recent, but rather of Native
American origin, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in
Sacramento within 24 hours to permit the NAHC to
determine the Most Likely Descendent of the
deceased Native American.

During construction
activities Daily
City of Kingsburg
and/or construction
contractor
City of
Kingsburg
with
assistance of
County
Coroner
Geology and Soils
Chapter 5- Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 5-3
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure When Monitoring is
to Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to
Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
GEO-1 Should a unique paleontological resource, site, or unique geological feature be unearthed during any
stage of Project activities, work in the area of
discovery will cease until the area is evaluated by a
qualified geologist and/or paleontologist. If
discoveries are uncovered, the Project proponent
will abide by recommendations of the geologist or
paleontologist.

During construction
activities Daily
City of Kingsburg
and/or construction
contractor
City of
Kingsburg
with
assistance of
a qualified
geologist
and/or
paleontologist
References
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 6-1
CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES
Association for the Beautification of Highway 99. 2016. Highway 99 Beautification Master Plan. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://fresnocog.wpenginepowered.com/wpcontent/uploads/publications/99/Master_Plan_2016_Update/Hwy_99_Assoc_MasterPlan_Sept._ 2016_.pdf.

California Department of Conservation. 2022. California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed October 18, 2023. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/.
—. 2015. Fault Activity Map of California. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2023. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://calfireforestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=988d431a42b242b29d89597ab693 d008.
—. 2023. State Responsibility Area (SRA) Viewer. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://calfireforestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=468717e399fa4238ad8686163876 5ce1.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2023. EnviroStor. Accessed October 18, 2023. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?global_id=37750009.

California Department of Water Resources. 2023. Dam Breach Inundation Map Web Publisher. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://fmds.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=dam_prototype_v2. —. 2023. GSA Map Viewer. Accessed October 18, 2023.
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/index.jsp?appid=gasmaster&rz=true.

California Geological Survey. 2022. CGS Information Warehouse: Mineal Land Classification. Accessed October 16, 2023.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc.

City of Kingsburg. 2017. "2015 Urban Water Management Plan." City of Kingsburg. 2010. "City of Kingsburg Emergency Operations Plan." —. 1992. Comprehensive General Plan & Environmental Impact Report for the Swedish Village of Kingsburg.

Accessed October 16, 2023. http://www.cityofkingsburgca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1815/City-of-Kingsburg-General-Plan. —. 2014. Kingsburg General Plan Land Use Designations. Accessed October 16, 2023. http://www.cityofkingsburg-ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/185/Kingsburg-Official-General-PlanMap-PDF. —. 2018. Kingsburg Zone Map. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://www.cityofkingsburgca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/275/Kingsburg-Official-Zone-Map.

References
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 6-2
County of Fresno. 2023. County of Fresno Zoing. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://gisportal.co.fresno.ca.us/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b921843d343d4df99 8b5b3c6a301756a.

County of Fresno. 2000. "General Plan Background Report." Fresno.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2023. FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer.

Accessed October 18, 2023. https://hazardsfema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9 cd.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. 2012. Air Quality Attainment Plans. Accessed October 20, 2023. http://valleyair.org/Air_Quality_Plans/air-quality-plans.htm.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. 2009. "Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emissions Impacts for New Projects under CEQA."
State Water Resources Control Board. 2023. GeoTracker. Accessed October 18, 2023. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Sacramento.

United States Census Bureau. 2023. Quickfacts - Kingsburg city, California; Fresno County, California.

Accessed Ocotber 16, 2023.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/kingsburgcitycalifornia,fresnocountycalifornia/PST 045222.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2023. Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants. Accessed October 20, 2023. https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html. —. 2023. Map of Sole Source Aquifer Locations. Accessed October 18, 2023. https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9ebb047ba3ec41ada1877155fe 31356b.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2023. National Wetlands Inventory. Accessed October 20, 2023. https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/.

United States Geological Survey. 2023. Areas of Land Subsidence in California. Accessed October 19, 2023. https://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-areas.html.

Appendices
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 A-1
Appendix A: CalEEMod Output Files
Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Government Office Building 18.50 1000sqft 0.42 18,500.00 0 Parking Lot 1.30 Acre 1.30 56,628.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.41 Acre 0.41 17,859.60 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/27/2025 10/30/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/30/2025 10/2/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 11/28/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/13/2025 10/16/2025 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/18/2024 11/20/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/14/2025 10/17/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/27/2024 11/29/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/19/2024 11/21/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/31/2025 10/3/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/14/2024 11/18/2024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.0257 0.2170 0.2150 4.5000e0040.0285 8.7200e0030.0372 0.0119 8.2500e0030.0201 0.0000 38.6517 38.6517 7.3500e0035.7000e00439.0051 2025 0.3089 1.2978 1.5415 3.1000e0030.0398 0.0489 0.0887 0.0108 0.0467 0.0575 0.0000 263.1055 263.1055 0.0408 4.7100e003265.5290 Maximum 0.3089 1.2978 1.5415 3.1000e0030.0398 0.0489 0.0887 0.0119 0.0467 0.0575 0.0000 263.1055 263.1055 0.0408 4.7100e003265.5290 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.0257 0.2170 0.2150 4.5000e0040.0141 8.7200e0030.0228 5.4300e0038.2500e0030.0137 0.0000 38.6516 38.6516 7.3500e0035.7000e00439.0051 2025 0.3089 1.2978 1.5415 3.1000e0030.0398 0.0489 0.0887 0.0108 0.0467 0.0575 0.0000 263.1052 263.1052 0.0408 4.7100e003265.5288 Maximum 0.3089 1.2978 1.5415 3.1000e0030.0398 0.0489 0.0887 0.0108 0.0467 0.0575 0.0000 263.1052 263.1052 0.0408 4.7100e003265.5288 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.10 0.00 11.45 28.36 0.00 8.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 11-18-2024 2-17-2025 0.4852 0.4852
2 2-18-2025 5-17-2025 0.4559 0.4559
3 5-18-2025 8-17-2025 0.4707 0.4707
4 8-18-2025 9-30-2025 0.2251 0.2251
Highest 0.4852 0.4852

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0915 0.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Energy 1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 29.7202 29.7202 2.9900e0035.7000e00429.9637 Mobile 0.1140 0.1594 0.8926 1.9200e0030.1919 1.6200e0030.1935 0.0513 1.5200e0030.0529 0.0000 177.5586 177.5586 0.0114 0.0108 181.0711 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.4935 0.0000 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1660 2.5694 3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974 Total 0.2068 0.1711 0.9026 1.9900e0030.1919 2.5100e0030.1944 0.0513 2.4100e0030.0538 4.6594 209.8485 214.5080 0.3410 0.0143 227.2875 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 Paving Paving 10/3/2025 10/16/2025 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/17/2025 10/30/2025 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 27,750; Non-Residential Outdoor: 9,250; Striped Parking Area: 4,469 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.71
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 37.00 15.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.6000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0730 0.0730 0.0000 0.0000 0.0736 Total 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.6000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0730 0.0730 0.0000 0.0000 0.0736 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 9.3000e0040.0000 9.3000e0041.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8600e0030.0197 0.0144 4.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 3.2300 3.2300 1.0400e0030.0000 3.2561 Total 1.8600e0030.0197 0.0144 4.0000e0059.3000e0047.5000e0041.6800e0031.0000e0046.9000e0047.9000e0040.0000 3.2300 3.2300 1.0400e0030.0000 3.2561 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9000e0030.0415 0.0261 6.0000e0051.7200e0031.7200e0031.5800e0031.5800e0030.0000 5.4311 5.4311 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4750 Total 3.9000e0030.0415 0.0261 6.0000e0050.0213 1.7200e0030.0230 0.0103 1.5800e0030.0119 0.0000 5.4311 5.4311 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4750 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.0000e0055.0000e0056.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1824 0.1824 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1840 Total 9.0000e0055.0000e0056.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1824 0.1824 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1840 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 8.2900e0030.0000 8.2900e0034.0100e0030.0000 4.0100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9000e0030.0415 0.0261 6.0000e0051.7200e0031.7200e0031.5800e0031.5800e0030.0000 5.4311 5.4311 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4750 Total 3.9000e0030.0415 0.0261 6.0000e0058.2900e0031.7200e0030.0100 4.0100e0031.5800e0035.5900e0030.0000 5.4311 5.4311 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4750 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0184 0.1475 0.1622 2.9000e0046.1900e0036.1900e0035.9300e0035.9300e0030.0000 23.8871 23.8871 4.4500e0030.0000 23.9983 Total 0.0184 0.1475 0.1622 2.9000e0046.1900e0036.1900e0035.9300e0035.9300e0030.0000 23.8871 23.8871 4.4500e0030.0000 23.9983 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.8000e0047.5800e0032.2200e0033.0000e0051.1400e0035.0000e0051.1900e0033.3000e0045.0000e0053.8000e0040.0000 3.2610 3.2610 2.0000e0054.9000e0043.4077 Worker 1.2200e0037.5000e0049.2500e0033.0000e0053.4000e0032.0000e0053.4200e0039.0000e0041.0000e0059.2000e0040.0000 2.5871 2.5871 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.6103 Total 1.4000e0038.3300e0030.0115 6.0000e0054.5400e0037.0000e0054.6100e0031.2300e0036.0000e0051.3000e0030.0000 5.8481 5.8481 9.0000e0055.6000e0046.0180 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0184 0.1475 0.1622 2.9000e0046.1900e0036.1900e0035.9300e0035.9300e0030.0000 23.8871 23.8871 4.4500e0030.0000 23.9983 Total 0.0184 0.1475 0.1622 2.9000e0046.1900e0036.1900e0035.9300e0035.9300e0030.0000 23.8871 23.8871 4.4500e0030.0000 23.9983 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1467 1.1843 1.3797 2.4700e0030.0463 0.0463 0.0443 0.0443 0.0000 204.6193 204.6193 0.0375 0.0000 205.5574 Total 0.1467 1.1843 1.3797 2.4700e0030.0463 0.0463 0.0443 0.0443 0.0000 204.6193 204.6193 0.0375 0.0000 205.5574 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.5100e0030.0647 0.0186 2.9000e0049.8000e0034.2000e0040.0102 2.8300e0034.0000e0043.2300e0030.0000 27.3943 27.3943 1.4000e0044.1200e00328.6263 Worker 9.6900e0035.7300e0030.0735 2.3000e0040.0291 1.3000e0040.0293 7.7400e0031.2000e0047.8600e0030.0000 21.4126 21.4126 5.7000e0045.7000e00421.5972 Total 0.0112 0.0704 0.0922 5.2000e0040.0389 5.5000e0040.0395 0.0106 5.2000e0040.0111 0.0000 48.8069 48.8069 7.1000e0044.6900e00350.2235 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1467 1.1843 1.3797 2.4700e0030.0463 0.0463 0.0443 0.0443 0.0000 204.6190 204.6190 0.0375 0.0000 205.5572 Total 0.1467 1.1843 1.3797 2.4700e0030.0463 0.0463 0.0443 0.0443 0.0000 204.6190 204.6190 0.0375 0.0000 205.5572 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.9300e0030.0372 0.0584 9.0000e0051.7500e0031.7500e0031.6200e0031.6200e0030.0000 7.7565 7.7565 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 1.7000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6300e0030.0372 0.0584 9.0000e0051.7500e0031.7500e0031.6200e0031.6200e0030.0000 7.7565 7.7565 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e0041.2000e0041.5100e0030.0000 6.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4407 0.4407 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4445 Total 2.0000e0041.2000e0041.5100e0030.0000 6.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4407 0.4407 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4445 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.9300e0030.0372 0.0584 9.0000e0051.7500e0031.7500e0031.6200e0031.6200e0030.0000 7.7565 7.7565 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 1.7000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6300e0030.0372 0.0584 9.0000e0051.7500e0031.7500e0031.6200e0031.6200e0030.0000 7.7565 7.7565 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.0000e0056.0000e0057.1000e0040.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 2.8000e0047.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 0.2056 0.2056 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2074 Total 9.0000e0056.0000e0057.1000e0040.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 2.8000e0047.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 0.2056 0.2056 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2074 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.1442 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.5000e0045.7300e0039.0500e0031.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 7.0000e0050.0000 1.2784 Total 0.1450 5.7300e0039.0500e0031.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.0000 1.2766 1.2766 7.0000e0050.0000 1.2784 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1140 0.1594 0.8926 1.9200e0030.1919 1.6200e0030.1935 0.0513 1.5200e0030.0529 0.0000 177.5586 177.5586 0.0114 0.0108 181.0711 Unmitigated 0.1140 0.1594 0.8926 1.9200e0030.1919 1.6200e0030.1935 0.0513 1.5200e0030.0529 0.0000 177.5586 177.5586 0.0114 0.0108 181.0711

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Government Office Building 0.521458 0.053308 0.175656 0.151963 0.025001 0.006656 0.014407 0.022718 0.000702 0.000287 0.023515 0.001463 0.002865 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.521458 0.053308 0.175656 0.151963 0.025001 0.006656 0.014407 0.022718 0.000702 0.000287 0.023515 0.001463 0.002865 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Parking Lot 0.521458 0.053308 0.175656 0.151963 0.025001 0.006656 0.014407 0.022718 0.000702 0.000287 0.023515 0.001463 0.002865

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.9651 16.9651 2.7400e0033.3000e00417.1329 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.9651 16.9651 2.7400e0033.3000e00417.1329 NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Government
Office Building
239020 1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Government
Office Building
239020 1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2900e0030.0117 9.8400e0037.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0048.9000e0040.0000 12.7550 12.7550 2.4000e0042.3000e00412.8308 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Government
Office Building
163540 15.1313 2.4500e0033.0000e00415.2810
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 19819.8 1.8338 3.0000e0044.0000e0051.8519 Total 16.9651 2.7500e0033.4000e00417.1329
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0915 0.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Unmitigated 0.0915 0.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0144 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e0050.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Total 0.0915 0.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0144 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e0050.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Total 0.0915 0.0000 1.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e0043.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.8000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974
Unmitigated 3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Government
Office Building

3.6752 /

2.25254

3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Government
Office Building

3.6752 /

2.25254

3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.7354 0.1202 2.8800e0037.5974
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Unmitigated 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Government
Office Building

17.21 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Government
Office Building

17.21 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.4935 0.2065 0.0000 8.6549
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 32 Date: 10/20/2023 8:25 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project
Fresno County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/27/2025 10/30/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/30/2025 10/2/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 11/28/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/13/2025 10/16/2025 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/18/2024 11/20/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/14/2025 10/17/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/27/2024 11/29/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/19/2024 11/21/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/31/2025 10/3/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/14/2024 11/18/2024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.7355 13.8343 15.2163 0.0307 7.1647 0.5726 7.7373 3.4465 0.5268 3.9733 0.0000 2,871.569 8 2,871.569
8 0.7691 0.0536 2,898.404
5 2025 29.0236 12.7058 15.0512 0.0305 0.4056 0.4755 0.8811 0.1099 0.4551 0.5650 0.0000 2,856.655 9 2,856.655
9 0.5444 0.0522 2,882.902
5 Maximum 29.0236 13.8343 15.2163 0.0307 7.1647 0.5726 7.7373 3.4465 0.5268 3.9733 0.0000 2,871.569 8 2,871.569
8 0.7691 0.0536 2,898.404
5 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.7355 13.8343 15.2163 0.0307 2.8444 0.5726 3.4170 1.3574 0.5268 1.8842 0.0000 2,871.569 8 2,871.569
8 0.7691 0.0536 2,898.404
5 2025 29.0236 12.7058 15.0512 0.0305 0.4056 0.4755 0.8811 0.1099 0.4551 0.5650 0.0000 2,856.655 9 2,856.655
9 0.5444 0.0522 2,882.902
5 Maximum 29.0236 13.8343 15.2163 0.0307 2.8444 0.5726 3.4170 1.3574 0.5268 1.8842 0.0000 2,871.569 8 2,871.569
8 0.7691 0.0536 2,898.404
5 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.07 0.00 50.13 58.74 0.00 46.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Energy 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mobile 1.0965 1.1568 7.1602 0.0157 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,598.545 7 1,598.545
7 0.0901 0.0894 1,627.451
5 Total 1.6050 1.2210 7.2162 0.0161 1.5164 0.0174 1.5337 0.4048 0.0166 0.4214 1,675.591 2 1,675.591
2 0.0916 0.0909 1,704.955
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Energy 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mobile 1.0965 1.1568 7.1602 0.0157 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,598.545 7 1,598.545
7 0.0901 0.0894 1,627.451
5 Total 1.6050 1.2210 7.2162 0.0161 1.5164 0.0174 1.5337 0.4048 0.0166 0.4214 1,675.591 2 1,675.591
2 0.0916 0.0909 1,704.955
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/18/2024 11/20/2024 5 3 2 Grading Grading 11/21/2024 11/28/2024 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 11/29/2024 10/2/2025 5 220 4 Paving Paving 10/3/2025 10/16/2025 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/17/2025 10/30/2025 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 27,750; Non-Residential Outdoor: 9,250; Striped Parking Area: 4,469 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.71
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 37.00 15.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.4971 0.4971 0.4573 0.4573 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Total 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 1.5908 0.4971 2.0878 0.1718 0.4573 0.6291 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0264 0.0132 0.2003 5.8000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 58.2900 58.2900 1.4500e0031.4200e00358.7501 Total 0.0264 0.0132 0.2003 5.8000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 58.2900 58.2900 1.4500e0031.4200e00358.7501 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6204 0.0000 0.6204 0.0670 0.0000 0.0670 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.4971 0.4971 0.4573 0.4573 0.0000 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Total 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.6204 0.4971 1.1175 0.0670 0.4573 0.5243 0.0000 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0264 0.0132 0.2003 5.8000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 58.2900 58.2900 1.4500e0031.4200e00358.7501 Total 0.0264 0.0132 0.2003 5.8000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 58.2900 58.2900 1.4500e0031.4200e00358.7501 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0330 0.0165 0.2503 7.2000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 72.8625 72.8625 1.8100e0031.7800e00373.4377 Total 0.0330 0.0165 0.2503 7.2000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 72.8625 72.8625 1.8100e0031.7800e00373.4377 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 2.7622 0.5722 3.3345 1.3357 0.5265 1.8621 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0330 0.0165 0.2503 7.2000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 72.8625 72.8625 1.8100e0031.7800e00373.4377 Total 0.0330 0.0165 0.2503 7.2000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 72.8625 72.8625 1.8100e0031.7800e00373.4377 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0162 0.6306 0.1900 2.9500e0030.1017 4.2500e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0700e0030.0334 312.3245 312.3245 1.6500e0030.0470 326.3698 Worker 0.1222 0.0611 0.9262 2.6700e0030.3040 1.3500e0030.3053 0.0806 1.2400e0030.0819 269.5912 269.5912 6.6900e0036.5800e003271.7193 Total 0.1384 0.6917 1.1162 5.6200e0030.4056 5.6000e0030.4112 0.1099 5.3100e0030.1152 581.9157 581.9157 8.3400e0030.0536 598.0891 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0162 0.6306 0.1900 2.9500e0030.1017 4.2500e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0700e0030.0334 312.3245 312.3245 1.6500e0030.0470 326.3698 Worker 0.1222 0.0611 0.9262 2.6700e0030.3040 1.3500e0030.3053 0.0806 1.2400e0030.0819 269.5912 269.5912 6.6900e0036.5800e003271.7193 Total 0.1384 0.6917 1.1162 5.6200e0030.4056 5.6000e0030.4112 0.1099 5.3100e0030.1152 581.9157 581.9157 8.3400e0030.0536 598.0891 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Total 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0158 0.6281 0.1861 2.9000e0030.1017 4.2500e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0600e0030.0333 306.3193 306.3193 1.5600e0030.0461 320.0910 Worker 0.1134 0.0544 0.8579 2.5800e0030.3040 1.2800e0030.3052 0.0806 1.1800e0030.0818 260.4468 260.4468 6.0200e0036.1300e003262.4228 Total 0.1292 0.6825 1.0440 5.4800e0030.4056 5.5300e0030.4112 0.1099 5.2400e0030.1151 566.7661 566.7661 7.5800e0030.0522 582.5139 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 0.0000 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Total 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 0.0000 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0158 0.6281 0.1861 2.9000e0030.1017 4.2500e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0600e0030.0333 306.3193 306.3193 1.5600e0030.0461 320.0910 Worker 0.1134 0.0544 0.8579 2.5800e0030.3040 1.2800e0030.3052 0.0806 1.1800e0030.0818 260.4468 260.4468 6.0200e0036.1300e003262.4228 Total 0.1292 0.6825 1.0440 5.4800e0030.4056 5.5300e0030.4112 0.1099 5.2400e0030.1151 566.7661 566.7661 7.5800e0030.0522 582.5139 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7854 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Paving 0.3406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1260 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0460 0.0220 0.3478 1.0400e0030.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 105.5866 105.5866 2.4400e0032.4800e003106.3876 Total 0.0460 0.0220 0.3478 1.0400e0030.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 105.5866 105.5866 2.4400e0032.4800e003106.3876 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7854 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 0.0000 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Paving 0.3406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1260 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 0.0000 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0460 0.0220 0.3478 1.0400e0030.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 105.5866 105.5866 2.4400e0032.4800e003106.3876 Total 0.0460 0.0220 0.3478 1.0400e0030.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 105.5866 105.5866 2.4400e0032.4800e003106.3876 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.8313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 29.0022 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0215 0.0103 0.1623 4.9000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 49.2737 49.2737 1.1400e0031.1600e00349.6476 Total 0.0215 0.0103 0.1623 4.9000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 49.2737 49.2737 1.1400e0031.1600e00349.6476 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.8313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 29.0022 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0215 0.0103 0.1623 4.9000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 49.2737 49.2737 1.1400e0031.1600e00349.6476 Total 0.0215 0.0103 0.1623 4.9000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 49.2737 49.2737 1.1400e0031.1600e00349.6476 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.0965 1.1568 7.1602 0.0157 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,598.545 7 1,598.545
7 0.0901 0.0894 1,627.451
5 Unmitigated 1.0965 1.1568 7.1602 0.0157 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,598.545 7 1,598.545
7 0.0901 0.0894 1,627.451
5 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Government Office Building 417.92 0.00 0.00 511,910 511,910 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 417.92 0.00 0.00 511,910 511,910
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Government Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 62.00 5.00 50 34 16 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Government
Office Building
654.849 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.654849 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Unmitigated 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.4223 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.9000e0042.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Total 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.4223 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.9000e0042.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Total 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:27 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/27/2025 10/30/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/30/2025 10/2/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 11/28/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/13/2025 10/16/2025 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/18/2024 11/20/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/14/2025 10/17/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/27/2024 11/29/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/19/2024 11/21/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/31/2025 10/3/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/14/2024 11/18/2024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.7210 13.8372 15.0929 0.0304 7.1647 0.5726 7.7373 3.4465 0.5268 3.9733 0.0000 2,841.961 0 2,841.961
0 0.7693 0.0544 2,869.073
4 2025 29.0213 12.7589 14.9403 0.0302 0.4056 0.4755 0.8811 0.1099 0.4551 0.5650 0.0000 2,828.140 2 2,828.140
2 0.5447 0.0530 2,854.645
8 Maximum 29.0213 13.8372 15.0929 0.0304 7.1647 0.5726 7.7373 3.4465 0.5268 3.9733 0.0000 2,841.961 0 2,841.961
0 0.7693 0.0544 2,869.073
4 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.7210 13.8372 15.0929 0.0304 2.8444 0.5726 3.4170 1.3574 0.5268 1.8842 0.0000 2,841.961 0 2,841.961
0 0.7693 0.0544 2,869.073
4 2025 29.0213 12.7589 14.9403 0.0302 0.4056 0.4755 0.8811 0.1099 0.4551 0.5650 0.0000 2,828.140 2 2,828.140
2 0.5447 0.0530 2,854.645
8 Maximum 29.0213 13.8372 15.0929 0.0304 2.8444 0.5726 3.4170 1.3574 0.5268 1.8842 0.0000 2,841.961 0 2,841.961
0 0.7693 0.0544 2,869.073
4 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.07 0.00 50.13 58.74 0.00 46.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Energy 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mobile 0.8109 1.2920 7.2919 0.0144 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,472.017 2 1,472.017
2 0.1050 0.0952 1,503.020
4 Total 1.3194 1.3562 7.3478 0.0148 1.5164 0.0174 1.5337 0.4048 0.0166 0.4214 1,549.062 7 1,549.062
7 0.1065 0.0966 1,580.524
0 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Energy 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mobile 0.8109 1.2920 7.2919 0.0144 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,472.017 2 1,472.017
2 0.1050 0.0952 1,503.020
4 Total 1.3194 1.3562 7.3478 0.0148 1.5164 0.0174 1.5337 0.4048 0.0166 0.4214 1,549.062 7 1,549.062
7 0.1065 0.0966 1,580.524
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 27,750; Non-Residential Outdoor: 9,250; Striped Parking Area: 4,469 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 1.71
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 37.00 15.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 7.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.4971 0.4971 0.4573 0.4573 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Total 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 1.5908 0.4971 2.0878 0.1718 0.4573 0.6291 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0235 0.0155 0.1722 5.1000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 51.7577 51.7577 1.6400e0031.5800e00352.2700 Total 0.0235 0.0155 0.1722 5.1000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 51.7577 51.7577 1.6400e0031.5800e00352.2700 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6204 0.0000 0.6204 0.0670 0.0000 0.0670 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.4971 0.4971 0.4573 0.4573 0.0000 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Total 1.2406 13.1186 9.5796 0.0245 0.6204 0.4971 1.1175 0.0670 0.4573 0.5243 0.0000 2,373.651 4 2,373.651
4 0.7677 2,392.843
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0235 0.0155 0.1722 5.1000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 51.7577 51.7577 1.6400e0031.5800e00352.2700 Total 0.0235 0.0155 0.1722 5.1000e0040.0657 2.9000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.7000e0040.0177 51.7577 51.7577 1.6400e0031.5800e00352.2700 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0294 0.0194 0.2152 6.4000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.6972 64.6972 2.0500e0031.9800e00365.3374 Total 0.0294 0.0194 0.2152 6.4000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.6972 64.6972 2.0500e0031.9800e00365.3374 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 2.7622 0.5722 3.3345 1.3357 0.5265 1.8621 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0294 0.0194 0.2152 6.4000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.6972 64.6972 2.0500e0031.9800e00365.3374 Total 0.0294 0.0194 0.2152 6.4000e0040.0822 3.6000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.6972 64.6972 2.0500e0031.9800e00365.3374 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0152 0.6746 0.1965 2.9600e0030.1017 4.2600e0030.1060 0.0293 4.0800e0030.0334 312.9274 312.9274 1.6000e0030.0471 327.0095 Worker 0.1087 0.0717 0.7963 2.3700e0030.3040 1.3500e0030.3053 0.0806 1.2400e0030.0819 239.3795 239.3795 7.5700e0037.3100e003241.7485 Total 0.1239 0.7463 0.9928 5.3300e0030.4056 5.6100e0030.4113 0.1099 5.3200e0030.1152 552.3069 552.3069 9.1700e0030.0544 568.7580 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0152 0.6746 0.1965 2.9600e0030.1017 4.2600e0030.1060 0.0293 4.0800e0030.0334 312.9274 312.9274 1.6000e0030.0471 327.0095 Worker 0.1087 0.0717 0.7963 2.3700e0030.3040 1.3500e0030.3053 0.0806 1.2400e0030.0819 239.3795 239.3795 7.5700e0037.3100e003241.7485 Total 0.1239 0.7463 0.9928 5.3300e0030.4056 5.6100e0030.4113 0.1099 5.3200e0030.1152 552.3069 552.3069 9.1700e0030.0544 568.7580 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Total 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0148 0.6719 0.1925 2.9000e0030.1017 4.2600e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0800e0030.0334 306.9140 306.9140 1.5200e0030.0462 320.7213 Worker 0.1012 0.0637 0.7405 2.2900e0030.3040 1.2800e0030.3052 0.0806 1.1800e0030.0818 231.3364 231.3364 6.8500e0036.8100e003233.5358 Total 0.1160 0.7356 0.9331 5.1900e0030.4056 5.5400e0030.4112 0.1099 5.2600e0030.1152 538.2504 538.2504 8.3700e0030.0530 554.2571 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 0.0000 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Total 1.4897 12.0233 14.0072 0.0250 0.4700 0.4700 0.4498 0.4498 0.0000 2,289.889 8 2,289.889
8 0.4200 2,300.388
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0148 0.6719 0.1925 2.9000e0030.1017 4.2600e0030.1059 0.0293 4.0800e0030.0334 306.9140 306.9140 1.5200e0030.0462 320.7213 Worker 0.1012 0.0637 0.7405 2.2900e0030.3040 1.2800e0030.3052 0.0806 1.1800e0030.0818 231.3364 231.3364 6.8500e0036.8100e003233.5358 Total 0.1160 0.7356 0.9331 5.1900e0030.4056 5.5400e0030.4112 0.1099 5.2600e0030.1152 538.2504 538.2504 8.3700e0030.0530 554.2571 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7854 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Paving 0.3406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1260 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0410 0.0258 0.3002 9.3000e0040.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 93.7850 93.7850 2.7800e0032.7600e00394.6767 Total 0.0410 0.0258 0.3002 9.3000e0040.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 93.7850 93.7850 2.7800e0032.7600e00394.6767 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.7854 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 0.0000 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Paving 0.3406 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1260 7.4371 11.6737 0.0179 0.3503 0.3503 0.3234 0.3234 0.0000 1,710.006 7 1,710.006
7 0.5420 1,723.555
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0410 0.0258 0.3002 9.3000e0040.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 93.7850 93.7850 2.7800e0032.7600e00394.6767 Total 0.0410 0.0258 0.3002 9.3000e0040.1232 5.2000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.8000e0040.0332 93.7850 93.7850 2.7800e0032.7600e00394.6767 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.8313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 29.0022 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0192 0.0121 0.1401 4.3000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 43.7663 43.7663 1.3000e0031.2900e00344.1825 Total 0.0192 0.0121 0.1401 4.3000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 43.7663 43.7663 1.3000e0031.2900e00344.1825 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 28.8313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 29.0022 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0192 0.0121 0.1401 4.3000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 43.7663 43.7663 1.3000e0031.2900e00344.1825 Total 0.0192 0.0121 0.1401 4.3000e0040.0575 2.4000e0040.0578 0.0153 2.2000e0040.0155 43.7663 43.7663 1.3000e0031.2900e00344.1825 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.8109 1.2920 7.2919 0.0144 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,472.017 2 1,472.017
2 0.1050 0.0952 1,503.020
4 Unmitigated 0.8109 1.2920 7.2919 0.0144 1.5164 0.0125 1.5288 0.4048 0.0117 0.4165 1,472.017 2 1,472.017
2 0.1050 0.0952 1,503.020
4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Government Office Building 417.92 0.00 0.00 511,910 511,910 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 417.92 0.00 0.00 511,910 511,910
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Government Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 62.00 5.00 50 34 16 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Government
Office Building
654.849 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.654849 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0600e0030.0642 0.0539 3.9000e0044.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e0034.8800e00377.0411 77.0411 1.4800e0031.4100e00377.4989 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Unmitigated 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003

0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.4223 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.9000e0042.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Total 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.4223 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.9000e0042.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Total 0.5015 2.0000e0052.0600e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0054.4200e0034.4200e0031.0000e0054.7100e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 26 Date: 10/20/2023 8:28 AM Kingsburg 13 ACre Parcel Annexation Project - Fresno County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied HARP Project Summary Report 10/24/2023 10:06:40 AM
***PROJECT INFORMATION***
HARP Version: 22118
Project Name: KINGSBURG_ANX
Project Output Directory: G:\Kingsburg_City of - 1345\134523002-Parcel Annexation\200 Technical\215 Environmental Planning\Appendices\App A - Air Quality\KINGSBURG_ANX HARP Database: NA
***FACILITY INFORMATION***
Origin
X (m):269936
Y (m):4044897
Zone:11
No. of Sources:1
No. of Buildings:0
***EMISSION INVENTORY***
No. of Pollutants:1
No. of Background Pollutants:0
Emissions
ScrID StkID ProID PolID PolAbbrev Multi Annual Ems MaxHr Ems MWAF (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr)
_____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ PJT_AREA 0 0 9901 DieselExhPM 1 115.24 0.071575 1
Background
PolID PolAbbrev Conc (ug/m^3) MWAF
________________________________________________________________ Ground level concentration files (\glc\)
________________________________________
9901MAXHR.txt
9901PER.txt
***POLLUTANT HEALTH INFORMATION***
Health Database: C:\HARP2\Tables\HEALTH17320.mdb
Health Table Version: HEALTH22013
Official: True
PolID PolAbbrev InhCancer OralCancer AcuteREL InhChronicREL OralChronicREL InhChronic8HRREL
_____________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
9901 DieselExhPM 1.1 5
***AIR DISPERSION MODELING INFORMATION*** Versions used in HARP. All executables were obtained from USEPA's Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling website (http://www.epa.gov/scram001/) AERMOD: 18081 AERMAP: 18081
BPIPPRM: 04274
AERPLOT: 13329
***METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION***
Version: 18081
Surface File: G:\Kingsburg_City of - 1345\134523002-Parcel Annexation\200 Technical\215 Environmental Planning\Appendices\App A - Air Quality\ KINGSBURG_ANX\Visalia_2007-2010.SFC Profile File: G:\Kingsburg_City of - 1345\134523002-Parcel Annexation\200 Technical\215 Environmental Planning\ Appendices\App A - Air Quality\KINGSBURG_ANX\Visalia_2007-2010.PFL Surface Station: 93144
Upper Station: 23230
On-Site Station: 0
Start Date & Time: 7 1 1 1
End Date & Time: 10 12 31 24
Hours Processed: 35064
Calm Hours: 9717
Missing Hours: 1213
***LIST OF AIR DISPERSION FILES***
AERMOD Input File: \KINGSBURG_ANX_AERMOD.inp
AERMOD Output File: \KINGSBURG_ANX_AERMOD.out
AERMOD Error File: \KINGSBURG_ANX_AERMOD.ERR
Plotfile list _____________
MAX1HRPJT_AREA.PLT
PERIODPJT_AREA.PLT
***LIST OF RISK ASSESSMENT FILES***
Health risk analysis files (\hra\)
_________
Con_CancerRisk.csv
Con_CancerRiskSumByRec.csv
Con_GLCList.csv
Con_HRAInput.hra
Con_NCAcuteRisk.csv
Con_NCAcuteRiskSumByRec.csv
Con_NCChronicRisk.csv
Con_NCChronicRiskSumByRec.csv
Con_Output.txt
Con_PathwayRec.csv
Con_PolDB.csv
Spatial averaging files (\sa\)
_______________________
**HA
RP -
Air
Disp
ersio
n
Mod
eling
and
Risk
Tool
v221
18 **10/
24/
2023
**Ex
port
ed
Risk
Res
ults

REC GRP NET
ID

X Y RIS
K_S
UM
SCE
NAR
IO
INH
AL_
RIS
K
SOI
L_RI
SK
DER
MAL
_RIS
K
MMI
LK_
RIS
K
WAT
ER_
RIS
K
FIS
H_R
ISK
CRO
P_RI
SK
BEE
F_RI
SK
DAI
RY_
RIS
K
PIG
_RIS
K
CHI
CKE
N_R
ISK
EGG
_RIS
K
4 SEN
SITI
V
2694
46 4044
913

2.65 31E11
1Yr
Can
cerD
erive
d_In
hSoil
Der
mM
Milk
_FA
H16t
o70

2.65 31E11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 SEN
SITI
V
2696
26 4045
220

1.12 02E10
1Yr
Can
cerD
erive
d_In
hSoil
Der
mM
Milk
_FA
H16t
o70

1.12 02E10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SEN
SITI V
2702
53 4044
772

1.29 7E10
1Yr
Can
cerD
erive
d_In
hSoil
Der
mM
Milk
_FA
H16t
o70

1.29 7E10
00000000000
**H
AR
P -
Air
Disp
ersi
on
Mod
elin
g
and
Risk
Tool
v22
118
**10
/24/
202
3 **Ex
port
ed
Risk
Res
ults
RE
C
GR
P
NET
ID
X Y SC
EN
ARI
O
CV CN
S
IMM
UN
KID
NE
Y
GIL
V
RE
PR
O/
DE
VEL
RE
SP
SKI
N
EYE BO
NE/
TEE
TH
EN
DO
BLO
OD
OD
OR
GE
NE
RAL
MA
XHI
4 SE
NSI
TIV
269
446
404
491
3 Non
Can
cer
Chr
onic
Deri
ved
_Inh
Soil
Der
mM
Milk
0 0 0 0 0 0 2.98
35E
-08
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.98
35E
-08
2 SE
NSI
TIV
269
626
404
522
0 Non
Can
cer
Chr
onic
Deri
ved
_Inh
Soil
Der
mM
Milk
0 0 0 0 0 0 1.25
97E
-07
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.25
97E
-07
3 SE
NSI
TIV
270
253
404
477 2
Non
Can
cer
Chr
onic
Deri
ved
_Inh
Soil
Der
mM
Milk
000000 1.45
86E
-07
0000000 1.45
86E
-07
**H
AR
P -
Air
Disp
ersi
on
Mod
elin
g
and
Risk
Tool
v22
118
**10
/24/
202
3 **Ex
port
ed
Risk
Res
ults
RE
C
GR
P
NET
ID
X Y SC
EN
ARI
O
CV CN
S
IMM
UN
KID
NE
Y
GIL
V
RE
PR
O/
DE
VEL
RE
SP
SKI
N
EYE BO
NE/
TEE
TH
EN
DO
BLO
OD
OD
OR
GE
NE
RAL
MA
XHI
1 SE
NSI
TIV
269
754
404
523
9 Non
Can
cer
Acut
e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 SE
NSI
TIV
269
626
404
522
0 Non
Can
cer
Acut
e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SE
NSI
TIV
270
253
404
477
2 Non
Can
cer
Acut
e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Appendices
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 B-1
Appendix B: Biological Resources
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
alkali-sink goldfields
Lasthenia chrysantha
PDAST5L030 None None G2 S2 1B.1
American bumble bee
Bombus pensylvanicus
IIHYM24260 None None G3G4 S2
Antioch efferian robberfly
Efferia antiochi
IIDIP07010 None None G1G2 S1S2
bristly sedge
Carex comosa
PMCYP032Y0 None None G5 S2 2B.1
brittlescale
Atriplex depressa
PDCHE042L0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
ABNSB10010 None None G4 S2 SSC
California alkali grass
Puccinellia simplex
PMPOA53110 None None G2 S2 1B.2
California glossy snake
Arizona elegans occidentalis
ARADB01017 None None G5T2 S2 SSC
California jewelflower
Caulanthus californicus
PDBRA31010 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
California linderiella
Linderiella occidentalis
ICBRA06010 None None G2G3 S2S3
California satintail
Imperata brevifolia
PMPOA3D020 None None G3 S3 2B.1
California tiger salamander - central California DPS
Ambystoma californiense pop. 1
AAAAA01181 Threatened Threatened G2G3T3 S3 WL
coast horned lizard
Phrynosoma blainvillii
ARACF12100 None None G4 S4 SSC
Crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
IIHYM24480 None Candidate
Endangered
G2 S2
Earlimart orache
Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis
PDCHE042V0 None None G3T1 S1 1B.2
foothill yellow-legged frog - south Sierra DPS
Rana boylii pop. 5
AAABH01055 Proposed
Endangered
Endangered G3T2 S2
Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest
Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest
CTT61420CA None None G2 S2.2
Greene's tuctoria
Tuctoria greenei
PMPOA6N010 Endangered Rare G1 S1 1B.1
hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
AMACC05032 None None G3G4 S4
Query Criteria: Quad IS (Selma (3611955) OR Malaga (3611966) OR Sanger (3611965) OR Wahtoke (3611964) OR Reedley (3611954) OR Conejo (3611956) OR Laton (3611946) OR Burris Park (3611945) OR Traver (3611944)) Report Printed on Friday, September 29, 2023
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 1 2023 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 3 Information Expires 3/1/2024
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Hurd's metapogon robberfly
Metapogon hurdi
IIDIP08010 None None G1G2 S1S2
lesser saltscale
Atriplex minuscula
PDCHE042M0 None None G2 S2 1B.1
loggerhead shrike
Lanius ludovicianus
ABPBR01030 None None G4 S4 SSC
Madera leptosiphon
Leptosiphon serrulatus
PDPLM09130 None None G3 S3 1B.2
molestan blister beetle
Lytta molesta
IICOL4C030 None None G2 S2
Morrison bumble bee
Bombus morrisoni
IIHYM24460 None None G3 S1S2
Northern California legless lizard
Anniella pulchra
ARACC01020 None None G3 S2S3 SSC
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
CTT44120CA None None G1 S1.1
pallid bat
Antrozous pallidus
AMACC10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
San Joaquin adobe sunburst
Pseudobahia peirsonii
PDAST7P030 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
San Joaquin kit fox
Vulpes macrotis mutica
AMAJA03041 Endangered Threatened G4T2 S3
San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass
Orcuttia inaequalis
PMPOA4G060 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Sanford's arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii
PMALI040Q0 None None G3 S3 1B.2
spiny-sepaled button-celery
Eryngium spinosepalum
PDAPI0Z0Y0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Swainson's hawk
Buteo swainsoni
ABNKC19070 None Threatened G5 S4
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
IICOL48011 Threatened None G3T3 S3
Valley Sacaton Grassland
Valley Sacaton Grassland
CTT42120CA None None G1 S1.1
vernal pool fairy shrimp
Branchinecta lynchi
ICBRA03030 Threatened None G3 S3
vernal pool tadpole shrimp
Lepidurus packardi
ICBRA10010 Endangered None G3 S3
western mastiff bat
Eumops perotis californicus
AMACD02011 None None G4G5T4 S3S4 SSC
western pond turtle
Emys marmorata
ARAAD02030 None None G3G4 S3 SSC
Report Printed on Friday, September 29, 2023
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 1 2023 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 3 Information Expires 3/1/2024
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
western spadefoot
Spea hammondii
AAABF02020 None None G2G3 S3S4 SSC
western yellow-billed cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus occidentalis
ABNRB02022 Threatened Endangered G5T2T3 S1
Winter's sunflower
Helianthus winteri
PDAST4N260 None None G2? S2? 1B.2
Record Count: 43
Report Printed on Friday, September 29, 2023
Commercial Version -- Dated September, 1 2023 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 of 3 Information Expires 3/1/2024
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
September 29, 2023
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:

Project Code: 2023-0135623
Project Name: City of Kingsburg 13 Acre Parcel Annexation CEQA Document Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 09/29/2023 2
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultationhandbook.pdf Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/whatwe-do.

The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.

In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservationmigratory-birds.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.
09/29/2023 3
▪
Attachment(s):

Official Species List

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600
09/29/2023 4

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0135623
Project Name: City of Kingsburg 13 Acre Parcel Annexation CEQA Document Project Type: New Constr - Above Ground
Project Description: The City of Kingsburg has proposed the annexation and prezoning of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 394-042-04. Additionally, the City has proposed a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the APN into four smaller parcels. Parcel 1 would be 0.65 acres in size, Parcel 2 would be 2.13 acres in size, Parcel 3 would be 10.3 acres in size, and Parcel 4 would be 0.11 acres in size. The City of Kingsburg has proposed the construction of an approximately 18,500 square foot office building on Parcel 2 (project site). The project site is approximately 13.18 acres in size and is generally located north of the intersection of Avenue B and Ventura Court in the County of Fresno. No development is proposed on Parcel 1, 3, or 4 at this time. Any future development of these parcels would require separate, future environmental analysis. Construction of the project would involve grading, paving, building construction, and painting. As a part of the project, Avenue B would be extended, providing access to the project site.

Project Location:

The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@36.52363975,-119.56975194735551,14z Counties: Fresno County, California
09/29/2023 5

1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

MAMMALS

NAME STATUS
Fresno Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5150
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered

AMPHIBIANS

NAME STATUS
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
Population: U.S.A. (Central CA DPS)
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened

INSECTS

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
1 09/29/2023 6

CRUSTACEANS

NAME STATUS
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

CRITICAL HABITATS

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.

YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
09/29/2023 7

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Provost & Pritchard Consulting
Name: Shaylea Stark
Address: 455 W Fir Ave
City: Clovis
State: CA
Zip: 93612
Email [email protected]
Phone: 5594492700
Appendices
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 C-1
Appendix C: Cultural Resources
To: Wyatt Czeshinski Record Search 23-414
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
455 W. Fir Ave.

Clovis, CA 93611
Date: October 9, 2023
Re: City of Kingsburg Parcel Annexation CEQA Project
County: Fresno
Map(s): Selma 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies completed within the project area. There have been seven previous cultural resource studies completed within the one half-mile radius: FR-00135, 00669, 00670, 00671, 01940, 02287, & 02452.

Record Search 23-414

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS According to the information in our files, there are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is unknown if any exist there. There are three recorded resources within the one-half mile radius: P-10-002966, 003930, & 005812. These resources consist of historic era ditches, and a railroad.

Resources: P-10-003930, & P-10-005812 have been given California Historical Resource Status codes of 6Y, indicating Determined ineligible for National Register by consensus through Section 106 process – Not evaluated for California Register or local listing. There are no other recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, for the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand the project consists of the construction of a 18,500 square foot building, the annexation and prezoning of APN 394-042-04. At present time, this project area has not been previously studied for cultural resources, and it is unknown if any exist there. As such, prior to ground disturbance activities, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey to determine if cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Jeremy E David, Assistant Coordinator Date: October 9, 2023 Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Appendices
Kingsburg 13-Acre Parcel Annexation Project
November 2023 D-1
Appendix D: Natural Resources Conservation Service
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
October 17, 2023
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.

They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.

Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.

The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 DhA—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17..........................13 References............................................................................................................15 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).

Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.

The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.

These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.

Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Custom Soil Resource Report
7 Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4044850 4044900 4044950 4045000 4045050 4045100 4045150 4045200 4045250 4044850 4044900 4044950 4045000 4045050 4045100 4045150 4045200 4045250 269790 269840 269890 269940 269990 270040 270090
269790 269840 269890 269940 269990 270040 270090
36° 31' 30'' N
119° 34' 16'' W
36° 31' 30'' N
119° 34' 3'' W
36° 31' 16'' N
119° 34' 16'' W
36° 31' 16'' N N 119° 34' 3'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 30 60 120 180
Meters
Map Scale: 1:2,180 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:

Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Aug 31, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2022—May 30, 2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
10 Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI DhA Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes, MLRA 17

Kingsburg City CouncilOctober 7, 2026

Kingsburg City Council
October 7, 2026