La Cañada Flintridge City Council
August 4, 2026

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

30 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026

GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

31 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026

GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS
The goals, policies, and actions in the Conservation Element promote the conservation, preservation, and sustainability of the City’s significant resources. They also emphasize and support the interrelationship of all General Plan elements to achieve a sustainable community.

CNE GOAL 1: Preserve and conserve natural resources in the community.

CNE Policy 1.1: Reduce long-term potable water demand through water conservation measures and the expanded use of recycled and alternative water sources, where available, to reduce projected water service demand.

CNE Action 1.1.1: Coordinate with local water providers to align City land-use policies with regional water conservation programs and drought-response measures, including support for tiered or water-budget–based rate structures, seasonal irrigation restrictions, and long-term demand-reduction strategies administered by water providers.

CNE Action 1.1.2: Facilitate the expanded use of graywater and other on-site water reuse systems consistent with State plumbing standards, including streamlining permitting, providing preapproved system templates, offering education and outreach, removing regulatory barriers, incentivizing installation, and, where appropriate, considering requirements for new development.

CNE Action 1.1.3: Coordinate with local water providers to implement and enhance ongoing public education programs that promote water conservation, drought resilience, and efficient indoor and outdoor water use.

CNE Action 1.1.4:Conduct a review of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and related development standards at least every five years to:
• Maintain consistency with updated State landscape efficiency requirements. • Evaluate opportunities to strengthen local water efficiency standards beyond State minimum requirements.
• Assess water budget thresholds and turf limitations.
• Develop strategies to reduce high outdoor water use in new development, major remodels, and existing large-lot residential properties.
• Evaluate demand-offset or water-neutral development approaches, where legally and technically feasible.
• Integrate wildfire-resilient plant palettes and defensible space compatibility.

CNE Action 1.1.5: Coordinate with Caltrans to promote the use of recycled or non-potable water for irrigation and landscaping within freeway rights-of-way, where infrastructure is available.

CNE Policy 1.2: Protect and enhance surface water and groundwater quality.

CNE Action 1.2.1: Require the implementation of Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater management techniques for new and redeveloped projects consistent with the City’s MS4 Permit and State Water Resources Control Board requirements to:
• Minimize pollutant loading and maintain pre-development hydrologic conditions to the maximum extent practicable.

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

32 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
• Control post-development runoff rates and volumes to reduce downstream erosion and protect stream habitat, consistent with applicable hazard mitigation standards. • Maximize on-site infiltration and groundwater recharge where geologically appropriate. • Preserve wetlands, riparian corridors, and appropriate buffer zones, and limit unnecessary vegetation clearing while protecting natural drainage patterns. • Incorporate structural and non-structural best management practices (BMPs) such as tree wells, retention basins, bioswales, rain gardens, and permeable surfaces to manage stormwater quality and quantity.

CNE Action 1.2.2:Coordinate with regional agencies and environmental partners to support water quality improvement efforts within the Arroyo Seco Watershed.

CNE Action 1.2.3: Support implementation of the Flint Wash Restoration Project and similar watershed enhancement initiatives to improve water quality and ecological function.

CNE Action 1.2.4: Integrate green infrastructure and stormwater management features into corridor and gateway improvement projects to enhance watershed protection and urban greening.

CNE Action 1.2.5: Implement public education programs that promote stormwater pollution prevention, watershed protection, and proper disposal of household and commercial pollutants.

CNE Action 1.2.6:Continue to upgrade and maintain the City’s stormwater drainage infrastructure to improve stormwater quality and regulatory compliance, while coordinating with flood control and hazard mitigation improvements addressed in the Safety Element.

CNE Action 1.2.7: Require all new development and major renovation projects with potential groundwater impacts to demonstrate compliance with State and federal water quality standards and implement appropriate mitigation measures.

CNE Action 1.2.8: Prior to approval of development on vacant lands require confirmation of adequate wastewater treatment facility and connection to an approved sewer or septic system consistent with applicable health and safety standards.

CNE Policy 1.3: Reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable development practices.

CNE Action 1.3.1: Require climate-responsive site and building design in new development and major renovations, including energy-efficiency measures that meet or exceed applicable Title 24 and CalGreen standards and are consistent with the City’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

CNE Action 1.3.2: Incorporate urban heat island reduction strategies in public and private development, including cool roofs, reflective or permeable paving, and expanded tree canopy and shade infrastructure.

CNE Action 1.3.3: Continue to implement and expand energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements in municipal facilities and operations, including fleet modernization, building retrofits, and employee commute reduction programs, and serve as a model for community energy conservation.

CNE Action 1.3.4: Maintain and update outdoor lighting standards in the Zoning Code to require energy-efficient fixtures and appropriate light levels consistent with State standards and dark-sky principles.

CNE Action 1.3.5: Facilitate installation of on-site renewable energy systems, including solar photovoltaic and solar-ready infrastructure, consistent with State energy standards and streamlined permitting requirements.

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

33 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
CNE Action 1.3.6: Promote participation in available rebate, incentive, and financing programs for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects and evaluate opportunities for local incentives or expedited permitting where feasible.

CNE Action 1.3.7: Coordinate with energy providers to expand community outreach and education regarding energy conservation programs, demand-reduction strategies, and renewable energy opportunities.

CNE Action 1.3.8: Continue to implement State electric vehicle charging requirements and facilitate installation of EV charging infrastructure in residential, commercial, and public facilities.

CNE Policy 1.4: Reduce solid waste generation and increase diversion of recyclable and organic materials from landfills.

CNE Action 1.4.1:Continue implementing and enforcing State-mandated recycling, organic waste diversion, and edible food recovery requirements by coordinating with authorized waste haulers and conducting ongoing compliance monitoring.

CNE Action 1.4.2: Continue public education and outreach programs to promote proper recycling and organic waste separation and increase awareness of waste diversion’s role in reducing landfill disposal and greenhouse gas emissions.

CNE Action 1.4.3: Promote waste reduction practices, including source reduction, reuse, recycling, on-site composting, and participation in edible food recovery programs.

CNE Action 1.4.4: Continue to enhance and enforce construction and demolition debris recycling and recovery requirements consistent with State building standards and local ordinance provisions.

CNE Action 1.4.5: Continue compliance with State organic waste procurement requirements and expand the use of compost, mulch, and other recycled materials in municipal operations to reduce landfill waste and support climate resilience.

CNE Goal 2: Preserve and strengthen habitat connectivity, native ecosystems, and the urban forest to support biodiversity, climate resilience, and community safety while balancing wildfire risk reduction.

CNE Policy 2.1: Protect and enhance biological resources, including native vegetation communities, wildlife habitat, and ecological connectivity, while balancing wildfire safety and protection of life and property.

CNE Action 2.1.1: Preserve publicly owned open space and pursue acquisition, conservation easements, or other land protection mechanisms from willing sellers for properties containing significant biological resources, including native vegetation communities, riparian corridors, and wildlife habitat, consistent with available funding and safety considerations. Open space areas of particular ecological and scenic value include Cherry Canyon, Weber Canyon, Gould Canyon, Winery Canyon, Hall-Beckley Canyon, Snover Canyon, Hay Canyon, and their surrounding hillsides, as well as other priority open space areas identified through ongoing habitat mapping and planning efforts.

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

34 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
CNE Action 2.1.2: Maintain and periodically update citywide biological resource mapping and habitat inventories, as feasible, to inform land-use planning, environmental review, and openspace conservation priorities.

CNE Action 2.1.3: Require, through applicable zoning, development standards, and environmental review processes, that new development adjacent to sensitive biological resources or open space areas incorporate appropriate buffers, habitat-sensitive site design, and native landscaping compatible with adjacent ecosystems, while meeting wildfire defensible space requirements.

CNE Policy 2.2: Protect, expand, and strategically manage the City’s urban forest as a critical asset for climate resilience and public health.

CNE Action 2.2.1: Maintain and periodically update the Tree Preservation Ordinance to protect significant trees, regulate removals, and strengthen replacement standards consistent with climate adaptation and wildfire safety requirements.

CNE Action 2.2.2: Prioritize urban tree canopy expansion in heat-vulnerable neighborhoods, streets, parking areas, and public facilities to reduce localized heat impacts and improve environmental equity.

CNE Action 2.2.3: Integrate urban forestry planning into capital improvement projects, streetscape enhancements, park improvements, and public infrastructure upgrades.

CNE Action 2.2.4: Establish long-term maintenance, replacement, and canopy-monitoring strategies to sustain tree health and track canopy-coverage trends over time.

CNE Action 2.2.5: Consider a target of up to 50% shaded parking area at tree maturity or through equivalent shade structures, where feasible and consistent with fire safety requirements.

CNE Action 2.2.6: Incorporate carbon sequestration and long-term canopy-cover considerations into urban forestry planning and open-space management strategies.

CNE Policy 2.3: Identify, protect, and enhance wildlife movement corridors, steppingstone habitats, and pollinator pathways, and reduce barriers to wildlife movement, to maintain ecological connectivity within the City and between regional habitat areas.

CNE Action 2.3.1: Identify, map, and periodically update priority wildlife movement areas within the City using local knowledge and best available science and coordination with CDFW, including:
• The northern foothill interface with Angeles National Forest • The Southern California Edison transmission easement corridor • Arroyo Seco buffer areas
• San Rafael Hills and canyon systems
CNE Action 2.3.2: Incorporate mapped wildlife corridors and habitat linkages into land use planning, zoning, capital improvement planning, and environmental review processes.

CNE Action 2.3.3: Encourage habitat-sensitive design in identified connectivity areas, including:
• Permeable fencing or wildlife-friendly barriers
• Reduced nighttime lighting where appropriate
• Native understory planting
• Avoidance of unnecessary fragmentation

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

35 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
CNE Action 2.3.4: Identify and evaluate physical and operational barriers to wildlife movement, including major roadways (such as the I-210 Freeway), fencing, channelized drainage facilities, lighting, and other infrastructure, and develop strategies to avoid, minimize, or mitigate fragmentation where feasible.

CNE Action 2.3.5: Evaluate and incorporate wildlife-friendly design features in culverts, bridges, drainage channels, and roadway improvements within identified habitat connectivity areas to reduce barriers to movement for small and medium-sized wildlife species.

CNE Action 2.3.6: Promote the establishment of pollinator-supportive landscapes in public rightsof-way, parks, utility corridors, and private development by using native flowering species and reducing pesticide use.

CNE Action 2.3.7: Evaluate the feasibility, in coordination with Southern California Edison, of enhancing the Southern California Edison transmission easement as a multi-benefit corridor that may support pollinator habitat and wildlife connectivity, and/or limited passive or active recreation facilities, while retaining the existing recreational trail and ensuring compatibility with utility maintenance, safety, and operational requirements.

CNE Action 2.3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions (including Pasadena and Glendale), the Angeles National Forest, conservancies, Southern California Edison, Caltrans, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to improve regional habitat connectivity and address major barriers such as the I-210 Freeway and other transportation corridors.

CNE Action 2.3.9: Pursue state and federal grant funding, cost-sharing arrangements, and publicprivate partnerships to evaluate and implement wildlife crossing improvements, habitat restoration, and corridor enhancements.

CNE Action 2.3.10: Following wildfire events, coordinate with regional agencies, land managers, and utility providers to assess impacts to wildlife corridors, pollinator habitat, and native vegetation, and prioritize restoration actions that:
• Stabilize soils and reduce erosion in burned foothill and canyon areas • Reestablish native plant communities and pollinator-supportive species • Prevent the spread of invasive species that can dominate post-fire landscapes • Restore or enhance wildlife movement pathways disrupted by fire, debris flows, or emergency repairs
• Integrate habitat recovery with trail repair and infrastructure restoration where feasible CNE Action 2.3.11: Maintain an up-to-date FEMA-approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and actively pursue state and federal hazard mitigation and post-disaster recovery funding to support habitat restoration, erosion control, and wildlife corridor repair following wildfire and climaterelated events.

CNE Action 2.3.12: Promote public education and design strategies to reduce human–wildlife conflicts in foothill and canyon areas, including wildlife-friendly fencing, responsible waste storage practices, and habitat-sensitive landscaping.

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

36 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
CNE GOAL 3: Preserve natural landforms, scenic resources, and community character that define the foothill setting.

CNE Policy 3.1: Require new development to be compatible with the City’s natural landforms, scenic resources, and established built character.

CNE Action 3.1.1: Continue to implement and periodically update the Hillside Development Ordinance to strengthen grading, erosion control, and vegetation management standards that minimize soil disturbance, protect natural landforms, reduce sedimentation, and address postwildfire debris-flow risks, in coordination with the Safety Element.

CNE Action 3.1.2: Protect prominent landforms, including ridgelines, knolls, waterways, creeks (either dry or active), canyons, or other unique topographic features or viewscapes, and limit alteration except where necessary for public safety or reasonable development.

CNE Action 3.1.3: Minimize visual impacts to hillside viewscapes by regulating grading, building placement, road alignments, cuts and/or fill slopes to avoid prominent scarring or skyline intrusion.

CNE Action 3.1.4: Continue implementing and periodically updating the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance to maintain the community's wooded character and scenic quality.

CNE Action 3.1.5: Pursue acquisition, conservation easements, or other land protection mechanisms from willing sellers for properties containing prominent landforms and scenic resources, consistent with available funding.

CNE Policy 3.2: Protect scenic viewscapes from public vantage points, designated corridors, and community landmarks.

CNE Action 3.2.1: Continue to implement and periodically evaluate development standards and design review criteria that protect scenic views along Angeles Crest Highway, Foothill Boulevard, and other designated view corridors.

CNE Action 3.2.2: Preserve the unique views of the mountains and foothills as seen from Foothill Boulevard by continuing to implement the development standards and design guidelines outlined in the Hillside Development Ordinance and the Downtown Village Specific Plan.

CNE Goal 4: Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources within the City.

CNE Policy 4.1: Protect and preserve archaeological, historical, tribal, and other significant cultural resources within the City.

CNE Action 4.1.1: Maintain and implement procedures for designation and preservation of local historical resources consistent with the Municipal Code and applicable preservation standards.

CNE Action 4.1.2: Continue to administer the Mills Act program, where feasible, to incentivize preservation and rehabilitation of designated historic properties consistent with adopted program guidelines.

CNE Action 4.1.3: Promote public awareness of the City’s cultural and historic resources through educational programs, outreach, social media articles, and interpretive materials.

La Cañada Flintridge General Plan

37 4. Conservation Element
GENERAL PLAN 2026
CNE Action 4.1.4: Support installation of plaques, markers, or interpretive displays to commemorate significant historic and cultural sites.

CNE Action 4.1.5: Evaluate acquisition, conservation easements, or adaptive reuse opportunities for significant historic structures where feasible and consistent with available funding.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Susan Koleda, AICP, Director of Community Development City of La Cañada Flintridge
From: Kiana Daniels, AICP, Environmental Project Manager Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Date: May 19, 2026
Subject: City of La Cañada Flintridge - General Plan Circulation Element Update

PURPOSE
This Technical Memorandum evaluates compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) for the City of La Cañada Flintridge General Plan Circulation Element Update (“Project”).

The Project consists of text amendments to the Circulation Element intended to address State law requirements and update transportation-related goals, policies, and implementation measures, including provisions related to multimodal transportation planning and truck circulation. The Project does not modify land use designations, increase development intensity or capacity, authorize roadway construction or physical improvements, approve development projects, or commit the City to a specific course of future action.

This memorandum documents the City’s CEQA determination and provides substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that the Project is exempt from CEQA.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS
California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a proposed activity is subject to environmental review. An activity is not subject to CEQA if it:
• Does not involve the exercise of discretionary powers by a public agency; • Will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; or
• Does not constitute a “project” as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15378.

State CEQA Guidelines §15378 defines a “project” as an activity that may result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, including activities undertaken by a public agency, such as the adoption or amendment of a General Plan or elements thereof.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 Because the Project involves discretionary adoption of a General Plan element update, it is considered a “project” under CEQA. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15061, once a project is determined to be subject to CEQA, the lead agency must determine whether the project is exempt. A project may be exempt if it falls within a statutory exemption, categorical exemption, or the common sense exemption.

CEQA ANALYSIS
Common Sense Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)) The Project qualifies for the common sense exemption under State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3), which applies where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The following substantial evidence supports this determination:
• Policy-Level Action Only. The Project consists solely of updates to goals, policies, and implementation measures within the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The Project does not approve, authorize, or commit the City to any specific development project, construction activity, or physical alteration of the environment. • No Physical Environmental Change. Adoption of the Project would not result in any direct physical change to the environment. The Project also would not create a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change because it does not modify land use designations, increase allowable development intensity, or increase development capacity. • No New Truck Routes or Freight Facilities. The Project does not establish new truck routes, expand roadway capacity, or introduce new freight corridors within the City. Rather, the Project formally identifies and incorporates existing regional truck facilities and circulation patterns already serving the City, including Interstate 210 and State Route 2, which currently function as the principal facilities accommodating regional truck movement through and adjacent to the City. The Project is intended to codify and recognize existing transportation infrastructure and circulation patterns and does not create new roadway alignments, authorize physical improvements, or alter the operational function of the transportation system. Because the Project merely documents and incorporates existing transportation facilities and circulation conditions, adoption of the Project would not result in physical changes to the environment or reasonably foreseeable indirect impacts. • No Commitment to Future Action. The Project establishes broad planning and policy guidance but does not commit the City to a definite course of action or authorize specific development projects. Any future actions implementing the policies contained in the updated Circulation Element would require separate discretionary approvals and environmental review under CEQA, as appropriate.
• No Growth-Inducing Effects. The Project does not increase allowable residential density, land use intensity, development capacity, or roadway capacity and would not facilitate or induce growth beyond that already anticipated under the City’s existing General Plan framework.
• Future Implementation Activities Subject to Separate Review. Any future capital improvements, roadway modifications, signage programs, traffic operational changes, or other physical implementation measures arising from the updated policies would require separate review and environmental analysis under CEQA, as appropriate.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 Based on the foregoing, it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment.

CONCLUSION
The Project consists of policy-level updates to the City’s Circulation Element that do not authorize or result in direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes to the environment. The Project establishes a planning framework intended to guide future decision-making and does not approve development projects, authorize construction activity, or commit the City to a definite course of action.

Any future actions implementing the updated policies would remain subject to separate discretionary review and environmental analysis under CEQA, as appropriate.

Based on the foregoing and in light of the whole record, it can be seen with certainty that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the common-sense exemption set forth in State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3).

Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §§15061 and 15062, a Notice of Exemption (NOE) has been prepared for the Project and will be filed with the Los Angeles County Clerk and the California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation upon Project approval.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Susan Koleda, AICP, Director of Community Development City of La Cañada Flintridge
From: Kiana Daniels, AICP, Environmental Project Manager Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Date: May 19, 2026
Subject: City of La Cañada Flintridge - General Plan Conservation Element and Open Space and Recreation Element Update

PURPOSE
This Technical Memorandum evaluates compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) for the City of La Cañada Flintridge General Plan Conservation Element and Open Space and Recreation Element updates (“Project”). The Project consists of text amendments to the Conservation Element and Open Space and Recreation Element intended to address current State law requirements and update goals, policies, and implementation measures related to conservation, biological resources, habitat connectivity, parks, recreation facilities, trails, open space preservation, and environmental stewardship. The Project includes updates associated with recent State legislation, including Senate Bill (SB) 1425 and Assembly Bill (AB) 1889, and incorporates updated background information, resource inventories, and planning policies. The Project does not modify land use designations, increase development intensity or development capacity, authorize park construction, approve trail expansion projects, authorize habitat restoration activities, approve land acquisition, or commit the City to a specific course of future action. This memorandum documents the City’s CEQA determination and provides substantial evidence supporting the conclusions that the Project is exempt from CEQA.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS
California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a proposed activity is subject to environmental review. An activity is not subject to CEQA if it:
• Does not involve the exercise of discretionary powers by a public agency; • Will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; or
• Does not constitute a “project” as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15378.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 State CEQA Guidelines §15378 defines a “project” as an activity that may result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, including activities undertaken by a public agency, such as the adoption or amendment of a General Plan or elements thereof.

Because the Project involves discretionary adoption of General Plan element updates, it is considered a “project” under CEQA.

Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15061, once a project is determined to be subject to CEQA, the lead agency must determine whether the project is exempt. A project may be exempt if it falls within a statutory exemption, categorical exemption, or the common sense exemption.

CEQA ANALYSIS
Common Sense Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)) The Project qualifies for the common sense exemption under State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3), which applies where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The following substantial evidence supports this determination:
• Policy-Level Action Only. The Project consists solely of updates to goals, policies, background information, and implementation actions within the Conservation Element and Open Space and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The Project does not approve, authorize, or commit the City to any specific development project, construction activity, or physical alteration of the environment.
• No Physical Environmental Change. Adoption of the Project would not result in any direct physical change to the environment. The Project also would not create a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change because it does not modify land use designations, increase allowable development intensity, increase development capacity, or authorize physical improvements.
• Resource Identification and Planning Framework Only. The Project updates resource inventories and planning information related to biological resources, wildlife connectivity, open space areas, recreation facilities, urban tree canopy, watersheds, and other environmental resources. These updates are informal and policy-oriented in nature and are intended to guide future planning decisions. The Project itself does not authorize implementation actions, site disturbance, or construction. • No Commitment to Future Action. The Project establishes broad planning and policy guidance but does not commit the City to a definite course of action or authorize specific projects. References within the updated Elements to future opportunities involving trail improvements, park enhancements, habitat restoration, wildlife corridor improvements, land acquisition, urban forestry programs, or recreational facility improvements are conceptual planning strategies only and do not constitute approvals of physical activities. • No Growth-Inducing Effects. The Project does not increase allowable residential density, land use intensity, development capacity, or infrastructure capacity and would not facilitate or induce growth beyond that already anticipated under the City’s existing General Plan framework.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 • Future Implementation Activities Subject to Separate Review. Any future capital improvements, park development activities, trail construction, habitat restoration projects, land acquisition actions, wildlife corridor improvements, or other physical implementation measures arising from the updated policies would require separate review and environmental analysis under CEQA, as appropriate.
• Environmentally Protective Purpose. The Project strengthens policies related to conservation of natural resources, preservation of biological resources, enhancement of habitat connectivity, preservation of open space resources, equitable access to parks and recreation facilities, and long-term environmental stewardship.

Based on the foregoing, it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment.

Class 8 Categorical Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15308) The Project also qualifies for the Class 8 categorical exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15308, which applies to actions taken by regulatory agencies for the protection of the environment.

The Project satisfies the requirements of this exemption for the following reasons:
• Regulatory Action. Adoption of General Plan elements constitutes an exercise of the City’s regulatory authority to guide land use and environmental protection through policies and standards.
• Environmental Protection Objective. The Project is intended to protect and enhance environmental resources by:
o Conserving biological resources and open space;
o Supporting wildlife movement and habitat connectivity; o Promoting climate resilience and sustainable resource management strategies; o Preserving parks, recreational resources, and natural systems; and o Minimizing environmental impacts associated with future land use and development decisions.
• Preventative Function. The updated Elements establish planning policies intended to avoid or reduce environmental degradation and preserve environmental resources, consistent with the purpose of the Class 8 exemption.

Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions (State CEQA Guidelines §15300.2) State CEQA Guidelines §15300.2 identifies circumstances in which categorical exemptions do not apply. Each exception has been evaluated as follows:

A. Location. The exception states, “Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. A project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may, in a particularly sensitive environment, be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.”

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 This exception applies only to Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 and is therefore not applicable to the Class 8 exemption.

B. Cumulative Impact. This exception states, “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, is significant.”
The Project does not result in incremental physical changes to the environment. As a policylevel update that does not authorize development or physical disturbance, the Project does not contribute to cumulative environmental impacts.

C. Significant Impact Due to Unusual Circumstances. The exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” The Project involves routine updates to General Plan elements intended to maintain consistency with current planning objectives and State requirements. The Project does not involve unusual circumstances, and there is no reasonable possibility that the Project would result in significant environmental impacts because it does not authorize physical changes to the environment.

D. Scenic Highways. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.”
The Project will not result in damage to scenic resources because it does not involve physical construction or environmental alteration.

E. Hazardous Waste Sites. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Government Code Section 65962.5 refers to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List, commonly known as the Cortese List.

The Project is not a site-specific development and does not involve disturbance of any property listed pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 (Cortese List).

F. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5.

The Project does not involve physical activity or site-specific modifications that could result in a substantial adverse change to a historical resource, as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5.

CONCLUSION
The Project consists of policy-level updates to the City’s Conservation Element and Open Space and Recreation General Plan that do not authorize or result in direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes to the environment. The Project establishes a planning framework intended to guide future decision-making and does not approve development projects, authorize construction activity, or commit the City to a definite course of action. Any future actions implementing the updated policies

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714.939.1030 would remain subject to separate discretionary review and environmental analysis under CEQA, as appropriate.

Based on the foregoing and in light of the whole record, it can be seen with certainty that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the common-sense exemption set forth in State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3).

Additionally, the Project qualifies for the Class 8 categorical exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15308 because it constitutes an action taken by a regulatory agency for the purpose of protecting the environment.

Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §§15061 and 15062, a Notice of Exemption (NOE) has been prepared for the Project and will be filed with the Los Angeles County Clerk and the California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation upon Project approval.

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: August 4, 2026
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges
Presenter: Ashlie Guillot, Management Analyst
Proposed Action: Adoption of a Resolution Adopting a Master Schedule of Fees and Charges
Environmental Impact: Staff has determined that amending the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges do not constitute a “project” under CEQA pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act under Sections 15273(a)(1) (Rates, Tolls Fairs and Charges), as well as Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(4) of Title 14 of the Code of California Regulations because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

Fiscal Impact: The annual impact on the General Fund is anticipated to be netneutral, recouping reasonable costs for services provided.

Background:

Each year, City staff reviews the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The review includes a cost analysis of fees necessitating an increase or decrease and the introduction of new fees for cost recovery. The review also includes the removal of fees no longer applicable.

Discussion/Analysis:

Following a thorough review, staff propose the modifications shown in Attachment A for consideration. The table includes fees associated with changes and does not reflect administrative changes, such as any changes related to corrections of typographical errors, changes in fee descriptions, or formatting changes.

Staff recommends that the City Council review and adopt the attached Resolution to adopt a Master Schedule of Fees and Charges.

Options:

1. Adoption of a Resolution adopting a Master Schedule of Fees and Charges; or

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges; and To direct staff to bring back an item to authorize staff to retain an outside consultant to conduct a comprehensive user fee study waiving the formal bidding process; or

3. Defer adoption of the attached Resolution Adopting a Master Schedule of Fees and Charges; and Provide staff with alternate direction.

Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council take the following action(s): Adoption of Resolution adopting a Master Schedule of Fees and Charges.

Attachments:

1. Resolution Amending the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges

2. Attachment A: Proposed Modifications

3. Attachment B: Industrial Waste Fees Rate Sheet

Resolution No. 26-XX

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MASTER

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City of La Cañada Flintridge (“City”) has conducted an extensive analysis of its services, the costs reasonably borne of providing those services, the beneficiaries of those services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services; and
WHEREAS, based on this analysis, City staff has recommended that the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges be amended to reflect changes in fees as follows: i) an increase in various Building & Safety Fees; ii) a decrease in the appeal of a staff decision to the City Manager; iii) an increase in the Innovation Fee; iv) the removal of the Sewer Covenant Review Fee; v) an increase in various Lanterman Auditorium Fees; vi) removal of the Lanterman Auditorium Rate Surcharge Exclusive Use Fee; vii) removal of the Lanterman Auditorium Refundable User Damage Deposit Fees; viii) removal of a Construction Placed Fee; ix) an increase in the USB/Flash Drive Fee; x) an increase in various Planning Fees; xi) removal of the GIS Printout Fees; xii) removal of the Home Occupation Permit Fee; xiii) removal of the Fence Review Fee; xiv) removal of the Pet Grooming Fee; xv) removal of the DUI Cost Recovery Fee; xvi) an increase in various Public Works Fees; xvii) removal of the C&D Administration Review Fee for Roof/Addition/Remodel Fee; xviii) removal of the C&D Administration Review Fee for Full Demolition/Large Commercial Fee; xix) a new C&D Administration Review Fee; xx) removal of the Encroachment Permit Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Fee; xxi) removal of the Encroachment Permit Curb/Parkway Drain Fee; xxii) removal of the Encroachment Permit Driveway Approach Fee; xxiii) removal of the Encroachment Permit Temporary Parking Fee; xxiv) removal of the Encroachment Permit for Private Encroachment in ROW without Agreement Fee; xxv) a new Encroachment Permit Fee; xxvi) removal of the Public Improvement Plan Check Fee; xxvii) a new Public Works Private Development Review Fee; and xxviii) removal of the Street Renaming Fee; and WHEREAS, the City Council of La Cañada Flintridge desires to amend its Master Schedule of Fees and Charges to reflect these new fees and increases in fees; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the above recitations are true and correct and, accordingly, are incorporated herein as findings and a material part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that this Resolution complies with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq.

Resolution No. 26-XX

Section 3. The City Council finds that this Resolution is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act under Sections 15273(a)(1) (Rates, Tolls Fairs and Charges), as well as Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(4) of Title 14 of the Code of California Regulations.

Section 4. The La Cañada Flintridge Master Schedule of Fees and Charges, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” is hereby adopted. All fees set forth set forth therein are for each identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units.

Section 5. The adopted Master Schedule of Fees and Charges reflects new fees, the removal of fees, or the increases in fees for the following: i) an increase in various Building & Safety Fees; ii) a decrease in the appeal of a staff decision to the City Manager; iii) an increase in the Innovation Fee; iv) the removal of the Sewer Covenant Review Fee; v) an increase in various Lanterman Auditorium Fees; vi) removal of the Lanterman Auditorium Rate Surcharge Exclusive Use Fee; vii) removal of the Lanterman Auditorium Refundable User Damage Deposit Fees; viii) removal of a Construction Placed Fee; ix) an increase in the USB/Flash Drive Fee; x) an increase in various Planning Fees; xi) removal of the GIS Printout Fees; xii) removal of the Home Occupation Permit Fee; xiii) removal of the Fence Review Fee; xiv) removal of the Pet Grooming Fee; xv) removal of the DUI Cost Recovery Fee; xvi) an increase of various Public Works Fees; xvii) removal of the C&D Administration Review Fee for Roof/Addition/Remodel Fee; xviii) removal of the C&D Administration Review Fee for Full Demolition/Large Commercial Fee; xix) a new C&D Administration Review Fee; xx) removal of the Encroachment Permit Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Fee; xxi) removal of the Encroachment Permit Curb/Parkway Drain Fee; xxii) removal of the Encroachment Permit Driveway Approach Fee; xxiii) removal of the Encroachment Permit Temporary Parking Fee; xxiv) removal of the Encroachment Permit for Private Encroachment in ROW without Agreement Fee; xxv) a new Encroachment Permit Fee; xxvi) removal of the Public Improvement Plan Check Fee; xxvii) a new Public Works Private Development Review Fee; and xxviii) removal of the Street Renaming Fee.

Section 6. This Master Schedule of Fees and Charges may be interpreted by the appropriate City department head, in consultation with the City Manager, and should there be a conflict between two fees, then the lower in dollar amount of the two shall be applied.

Section 7. This Resolution shall go into full force and effect immediately; however, the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges shall become effective sixty (60) days after adoption of this Resolution.

Section 8. Upon the effective date of the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges adopted herein, the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges shall supersede any and all prior resolutions and fee schedules adopted prior to that date.

Section 9. All fees and charges in the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges are nonrefundable unless otherwise provided by federal or state law or as provided below:

Resolution No. 26-XX

Service/Fee Title Refund Criteria Amount Unit
Facility Rentals
(Memorial Parks,
Mayor’s Discovery
Park, Athletic Fields)
Written Cancellation Notice
Received
- 30 days prior (Residents)
- 60 days prior (NonResidents)
100% of amount paid Application
Lanterman
Auditorium
Written Cancellation Notice
Received
- 45 days prior
- Less than 45 days prior
- Less than 5 days prior
100% of deposit
50% of deposit
No refund
Application
Entitlement Fees Written Cancellation Notice
Received
- Prior to Application
Completeness Review
- After First Review
- After Second review
completed, or application
scheduled for public hearing
- Third review
- CEQA-no initiated
75% of entitlement fees paid
50% of entitlement fees paid
25% of entitlement fees paid
No refund
100% of CEQA fees paid
Application
Building & Safety
Fees
Written Cancellation Notice
Received
-prior to commencement of
any work or construction no
later than one year after the
expiration date of the permit
-80% of building fees paid
-80% of plan check fees
paid if no review has been
performed
-No refund of plan check
fees paid if review has been
performed
Permit
Encroachment Fees Written Cancellation Notice
Received
-Prior to two business days
from date of application
received
-After two business days
-100% refund of amount
paid
-No refund of amount paid
Permit
Filming/Still
Photography Permit
Written Cancellation Notice
Received
-Prior to 3PM last business
day
-100% refund of Permit Fee
paid
-66% refund of Right-ofWay/City Property Use Fee
Section 10. AUTHORITY TO WAIVE, SUSPEND, OR MODIFY FEES. The City Council may, by resolution, temporarily or permanently waive, suspend, reduce, or otherwise modify any fee, charge, or rate set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule, in whole or in part, provided that such action is consistent with applicable law. Any such waiver, suspension, reduction, or modification shall be effective for the period and under the terms specified in the resolution adopted by the City Council. Unless otherwise stated in such resolution, all fees, charges, and rates listed in the Master Fee Schedule shall remain in full force and effect. City Staff has authority to make clerical changes to the fee schedule that do not result in any substantive

Resolution No. 26-XX

changes to the fees provided for in this fee schedule. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2026. ______________________________
Jeanne Hobson, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk

Resolution No. 26-XX

State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) ss.

City of La Cañada Flintridge )
I, Tania Garcia, City Clerk of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge at a Regular Meeting held on the 4th day of August 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
Dated: August 4, 2026
____________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Credit Card Payment (ConnectLCF)
This is a third-party fee, and no portion of the fee is retained by or remitted to the city.

The processing company will charge a non-refundable
transaction fee of a minimum of $6.95 or up to 2.95% fee to any credit card payment. The processing company collects these fees and not the city.

2.95%
($6.95 Minimum)
Payment
eCheck Payment (ConnectLCF)
This is a third-party fee, and no portion of the fee is retained by or remitted to the city.

The processing company will charge a non-refundable
transaction fee of $1.75 to any eCheck payment. The
processing company collects these fees and not the city. $1.75 Payment
Credit Card & eCheck Payments (ActiveNET) -
Reservations for Parks and Lanterman Auditorium
This is a third-party fee, and no portion of the fee is retained by or remitted to the city.

The processing company will charge a non-refundable
transaction fee of 3.33% fee to any credit card or eCheck payment. The processing company collects these fees and not the city.

3.33% Payment
Cash & Check Payments
There are no processing fees for cash or check payments.

No Charge Payment
The City of La Cañada Flintridge is not responsible for fees charged by outside agencies or third parties, whether such fees are listed in this document or not.

Third-Party Fees
Payment Processing Fee

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Administrative Review Fee Cost recovery fee for processing applications. Varies Application Appeal of a Commission Decision to City Council
Administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs (such as newspaper publication, mailers, staff time, etc.) Exceptions: Refer to the Planning Division's Fee Schedules for fees associated with Planning Commission appeals.
$220
+ Direct Costs
Application
Appeal of a Staff Decision to City Manager
Administrative review fee and any direct costs (such as mailers, staff time, etc.)
Exceptions: Refer to the Planning Division's Fee Schedules for fees associated with Planning Commission appeals.
$100
+ Direct Costs
Application
Appeal of a Staff Decision and/or City Manager Decision to the Commission
Administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs (such as newspaper publication, mailers, staff time, etc.) Exceptions: Refer to the Planning Division's Fee Schedules for fees associated with Planning Commission appeals.
$220
+ Direct Costs
Application
County Posting and/or Fish
and Game Fee
Applicable LA County and/or Fish and Game posting Direct Costs Application Development Permit/Cases $70.31 Application
B&S Trade Permit $43.43 Application
Encroachment Permit $44.46 Application
Encroachment Permit (Trash Bin) $38.26 Application
Notification Mailers &
Postcards
Public meeting and public announcement notifications
including mailers and postcards.
$1.50 Notification /
Page
Oversized Document
Printing
Larger than 11 X 17 $3.50 Page
Citywide
Innovation Fee (Cost for
future equipment and
software updates)
Appeals
Note: Refer to each department’s fee schedule for appeal fees associated with department-specific services and codes.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Up to 5 Pages $5 Page
6 – 10 Pages $10 Page
11+ Pages $15 Page
Returned Payment
Processing
This fee is for all types of returned payments from the banking institution. (e.g. insufficient funds (NSF), unable to locate account, ceiling limit, etc.).
$18 Payment
Oversized Document
Scanning/Upload to
ConnectLCF Fee (Larger
than 11 X 17)

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Group $124.08 Hour
LCF Based Organization with Unpaid Staff $72.38 Hour
Auditorium Manager $77.55 Hour
Auditorium Technician $55.84 Hour
Base Fee $279.18 Reservation
LCF Based Groups $120.98 Reservation
Base Fee: LCF Based Groups booking $5,000 or more worth of use per calendar year & LCUSD affiliated use.

Waived Reservation
One Time Cleaning Fee Direct Costs Performance
Special Effects Cleaning Direct Costs Performance
Marley Flooring Rental Fee $600 Setup /
Clean Up
Liability Insurance
Applicants must provide a certificate of liability insurance with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence naming the City of La Cañada Flintridge as a certificate holder.

Direct Costs Reservation
Recreation Technology Fee $15 Application
Recreational Court Rental
Fee
Tennis & Basketball Courts $10 Hour
Liability Insurance Applicants must provide a certificate of liability insurance with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence naming the City of La Cañada Flintridge as a certificate holder.

Deposit Reservation
Recreation Technology
Fee
$15 Application
Post Event Cleaning Fee Direct Costs Event
Mayor's Discovery Park
Concession Facility Rental
Hourly fee plus direct cost for cleaning. $20
+ Direct Costs
Hour
Lanterman Auditorium
Hourly Use
Auditorium Staff
Capital Improvement Use
Auditorium Cleaning
General Fees
Recreational Facilities
Administration

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Rental Fee (Use Fee) $20 Hour
Electrical Usage - 1st hour $135 Hour
Electrical Usage - Additional hours after 1st hour $10 Hour Rental Fee (Use Fee) $50 Hour
Field Lights $20 Hour
Monday-Saturday Usage (4 Hour Minimum) Direct Costs Hour Sunday Usage (4 Hour Minimum) Direct Costs Hour
Application $100 Event
Review Fee: Police, Fire, etc.

Direct cost of the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside personnel or material costs.

Direct Costs Event
Traffic Engineer Review $250 Hour
Traffic Control Device Direct Costs Event
Special Events
Memorial Park
Athletic Fields
Park Porter Service
Special Event

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Request for a hearing before Building Board of Appeals $966.04 Appeal Investigation fee for work done without a required permit shall be equal to the permit fee, but not less than the required minimum.
100% of Permit Fee
($756.70 Minimum)
Investigation
Exception: One or two family dwellings, when work is
performed by owner-builder the investigation fee shall be equal to the permit fee, but not less than the required minimum.
100% of Permit Fee
($378.35 Minimum)
Investigation
Application Fee
This fee must be paid at the time of application.
$492.06 Application
Investigation Fee
Each hour, or fraction therefore, after the first 2 hours. $246.03 Hour
Occupant Load
Determination: Parking
Requirements
For determining occupant load for purposes of parking
requirements pursuant to Title 11 (Zoning).
$246.03 Determination
Building & Residential Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
General Fees
Note: General fees are applicable to any / all permit types including building permits, MEP permits, grading permits, etc.

Building Code Appeal
Exceptions
A. Regarding the unsafe condition of building or structure per Section 102.4.1.

B. Regarding the initial determination as a welded steel moment frame building in a high earthquake damaged area.

C. Regarding the initial determination as a pre-April 13, 1975 concrete tilt-up building.

D. Regarding initial determination as an unreinforced masonry building (URM) / potentially earthquake hazardous building.

Investigations Unpermitted Work
Note: The payment of the investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions.

Alternate Materials & Methods of Construction
Building & Safety

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
This fee is for the plan check to "standardize" plans per LACBC Section 107.3. The fee shall be 85% of permit fee (see Table 1-A), but not less than the required minimum. 85% of
Permit Fee
($338.38 Minimum)
Plan Check
Extension
Standard plans shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of approval. The standard plan can be extended by the Building Official an additional year upon payment of an extension fee equal to 30% of the original fee providing the standard plans are being restandardized under the same year codes as the original standard plan approval.
30% of
Plan Check Fee
Plan Check
Street Address For assignment or modification of street address.

Note: The applicant is responsible for paying the required applicable fees to LA County Department of Public Works, Survey Mapping and Property Management.
$202.35 Address
Permit Issuance Fee Cost recovery fee for processing the permit application and must be paid prior to permit issuance.
$62.03 Permit
General Plan (GP) Maintenance Fee
5% surcharge of all building permit fees to recover 50% of costs.
5% of Permit Fee Permit
Los Angeles County Building Code (LACBC) Plan
Maintenance Fee
The plan maintenance fee shall be 2% of building permit fee (based on valuation of work) per LACBC Section 107.16.
2% of Permit Fee
($22.16 Minimum)
($946.56 Maximum)
Permit
Group R-3 occupancy $227.25 Written Order
All other occupancies $454.85 Written Order
Unpermitted Work
(Retroactive Permit)
Unpermitted Work fee is for work conducted without a
required permit and doubles the permit fee (See Table 1-A).

This fee applies to all permits issued by the Building & Safety Department.
200% of
Permit Fee
Permit
Standardize Plans
Permit Fees - All Permit Types
Maintenance Fees
Noncompliance Fee
Note: This noncompliance fee is for when person fails to comply with a written order.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Base Fee $98.57 Flat Fee
Base Fee $147.67 Flat Fee
Plus for each additional $1,000 (or fraction thereof) in excess of $1,000.
$38.04 Valuation
Base Fee $1,060.69 Flat Fee
Plus for each additional $1,000 (or fraction thereof) in excess of $25,000.
$29.25 Valuation
Base Fee $1,792.09 Flat Fee
Plus for each additional $1,000 (or fraction thereof) in excess of $50,000.
$22.20 Valuation
Base Fee $2,901.84 Flat Fee
Plus for each additional $1,000 (or fraction thereof) in excess of $100,000.
$15.14 Valuation
Energy Resources
Conservation and
Development Commission
of the State of California
Permit Fee
The permit fee specified in Table 1-A shall be increased by 10 percent for all construction work required to comply with the rules and regulations adopted by the Energy Resources
Conservation and Development Commission of the State of California. This increase in fee shall be included in the building permit fee for the purpose of determining the plan checking fee.
10% of
Permit Fee
Permit
State's Disabled Access
and Adaptability
Requirement Permit Fee
The permit fee specified in Table 1-A shall be increased by 5 percent for all construction work required to comply with Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Section 101, et seq., the State's disabled access and adaptability requirements. The increase in fee shall be included in the building permit fee for the purpose of determining the plan check fee.
5% of
Permit Fee
Permit
$50,001 - $100,000 Valuation
$100,001 Valuation or more
$25,001 - $50,000 Valuation
Building Permit Fees
Building Permit Fee
(LACBC Table 1-A)
$0 - $700 Valuation
$701 - $25,000 Valuation

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Residential $5.38 Square Foot
Non-Residential $0.87 Square Foot
Public Storage $0.09 Square Foot
Group R Occupancy $13 Per $100,000
Valuation
Other Occupancies $28 Per $100,000
Valuation
$1.00 - $25,000 or fraction thereof $1 Valuation
$25,000.01 - $50,000 or fraction thereof $2 Valuation
$50.000.01 - $75,000 or fraction thereof $3 Valuation
$75,000.01 - $100,000 or fraction thereof $4 Valuation
Every $25.000.01 or fraction thereof above $100,000.01 $1 Valuation Site Inspections
For a site inspection not otherwise covered herein by a fee and which is regulated by the City of La Canada Flintridge. $946.56 Inspection
Demolition Inspection
For inspection of the demolition of a building or structure (including sewage system termination).
$367.33 Inspection
Inspection or Reinspection of Group A, Division 4, Structures $491.37 Inspection Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours $220.56
(4 Hours Minimum)
Hour
Outside Agency Fees
Collected by La Canada
Flintridge
School Impact Fee - As adopted by LCUSD on 06/20/2026
Note: The City of La Cañada Flintridge collects the school impact fee on behalf of the La Canada Unified School District.

State Strong-Motion Implementation Program (SMIP) Fee
Note: State Strong-Motion Implementation Program (SMIP) with a minimum of $0.50. PRC Code 2705. This surcharge shall not be included in the building permit fee for the purpose of determining plan check fee.

Green Building Fee
Note: Building Standards Administration Special Revolving Fund (BSASRF) (Green Building Fee) - HSC 18931.1. This surcharge shall not be included in the building permit fee for the purpose of determining plan check fee.

Inspections

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Other Inspections
For inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated. $220.56 Hour
Pool Inspection Fee
Inspection of Barriers for Swimming Pools, Spas or Hot Tubs $206.92 Inspection
Groups of R or U
For inspection of any use, occupancy or change in use or occupancy Group R or U Occupancy.
$491.37 Inspection
Up to 5,000 square feet $1,211.03 Inspection
5,001 - 10,0000 square feet $1,457.40 Inspection
10,0000 - 100,000 square feet $2,422.92 Inspection
100,001 square feet or more $3,672.38 Inspection
The first inspection of the first structure or device. $367.33 Inspection For each additional structure or device. $491.37 Inspection Floor Area: Up to 2,500 square feet $978.43 Permit
Floor Area: 2,501 square feet or more $1,900.21 Permit
Trailer Coaches For investigation and/or permit for trailer coaches required by Chapter 69.
$363.87 Permit
Downtown Village Specific
Plan (DVSP) Fee
New construction and tenant improvements. $0.31 Square Foot Certificate of Occupancy Issuance Fee $227.25 Certificate Issuance Fee $341.30 Certificate
Extension Fee $227.25 Certificate
Preliminary Plan Review Preliminary plan review for conceptual approval code application/interpretation prior to submittal of permit application.
$492.06
(2 Hours Minimum)
Hour
Note: For application and investigation fee for relocation building permits as required by Chapter 34.

Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy
Inspections (Continued)
Groups Other Than R or U
Inspection of Use and/or Occupancy Groups Other Than R or U. This fee is based on affected floor area.

Inspection of Structures or Devices Regulated by Chapter 66 Building Relocation
Permits

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Base Fee
When an application for a building permit is submitted for review, whether or not plans or specification are required by Section 106.4.2, a fee shall be 85% of the permit fee. This fee includes the first and second round of plan check, and the final stamp.
85% of
Permit Fee
($184.00 Minimum)
Valuation
Additional Plan Checks
For additional plan checks required by beyond the first and second check of plans or reports, due to complexity of plans or changes, errors, omissions, or additions or revisions of approved or resubmitted plans.

Note: This does not include additional plan checks required due to scope of work changes.
$246.03 Hour
Drainage Plan Checks
Drainage plans with 50 cubic yard of grading or less that requires drainage plan approval and Low Impact Development Plans.
$184
(2 Hours Minimum)
Hour
Expedited Plan Checks
Are for residential buildings, commercial buildings, plumbing, electrical, and/or mechanical.

Note: Grading permits are not eligible for expedited reviews. 175% of
Plan Check Fee
Plan Check
Simple Plan Review Fees Review of drawings and data which are sufficient to determine nature and scope of work in lieu of submittal of plans and specifications as defined in Section 107.2 (including
pedestrian protection, underground tanks, etc.)
$184 Permit
Scope of Work Change Any revisions resulting in a change to the scope of work during the plan check shall be 25% of the plan check fee. 25% of
Plan Check Fee
Plan Check
Building Plan Check Fees
Plan Check Fees

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Plan Check The Building Official may approve a set of plans for a building or structure as a "standard plan", provided that the applicant has made proper application, submitted complete set of plans as required by this section, and paid the plan checking fee, or fee listed for standards plans, whichever is greater.
70% of
Plan Check Fee
Plan Check
Extension, where permitted, of unexpired permit. 25% of Permit Fee
Permit
New Permit (Previous Permit Expired)
New permit issued within 1 year of expiration of previous permit, provided no changes have or will be made in the original plans.
50% of
Permit Fee
Permit
Extension, where permitted, of an unexpired plan check where no permit has been issued.
25% of Plan Check
Fee
Valuation
New Plan Check (Previous Plan Check Expired): No Changes Where submitted within 1 year of previous plan check
approval date and there are no changes to the plans and no change in code cycle.
50% of Plan Check
fee
Valuation
New Plan Check (Previous Plan Check Expired)
Where submitted within 1 year of previous plan check
approval date and there are changes to the plans and there has been a change in the code cycle.
65% of Plan Check
fee
Valuation
Extensions & Expired Permit / Plan Checks
Permit Extension
Plan Check Extension
Standard Plans
Plans shall reflect laws and ordinances in effect at the time a permit is issued except as provided herein below in this section.

Nothing in this section shall prohibit modifying the remit set of plans to reflect changes in laws and ordinances, which have become effective since the approval of the standard plan. The standard plans shall become null and void where the work required by such changes exceeds 10 percent of the value of the building or structure. When it is desired to use an approved "standard plan" for an identical structure, two plot plans and one duplicate plan shall be submitted and a plan checking fee equal to 70 percent of the full plan checking fee required above shall be paid at the time application is made for such identical structure. Such duplicate plans shall be compared, stamped and kept on the project site. In case of deviation from this standard plan, except as permitted in this section, complete plans, together with a full plan-checking fee, shall be submitted for the proposed work.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Pool Permit, Plan Check,
and Issuance Fees
See Building Fees: The permit fee, plan check fee, and
issuance fee are the same building fees.

Varies Varies
Pool Inspection Fee
(Barriers)
Inspection of barriers for swimming pools, spas, or hot tubs. $206.92 Permit New Private Residential Inground Swimming Pools
For new private, residential, inground swimming pools for single, or multifamily occupancies, including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping, and other similar
electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool.
$182.27 Each
Other Types
Other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirlpools, spas, hot tubs, and alterations to existing swimming pools.
$122.67 Each
Backflow Prevention
Device
For each backflow-prevention device on unprotected water supplies, pools, tanks, vats, etc. (including incidental water piping).
$36.70 Each
Swimming Pool Drainage
Trap & Receptor
For each swimming pool drainage trap and receptor, whether connected to a building drain or a building sewer (water supply for pool not included).
$36.70 Each
Pools, Spas, etc.

Electrical System Fees

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Base Fee $364 Flat Fee
Base Fee $364 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 100 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 50 cubic yards.
$183.14 100 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $2,345.75 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 1,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 1,000 cubic yards.
$153.86 1,000 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $3,730.49 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 1,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 10,000 cubic yards.
$98.22 1,000 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $12,570.26 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 10,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 100,000 cubic yards.
$296.72 10,000 Cubic
Yard
50% of the grading work cost estimate. 50% of
Cost Estimate
Permit
50% of the grading work cost estimate of the first 100,000 cubic yards.
50% of
Cost Estimate
Permit
Plus 25% of the grading work cost estimate of that portion in excess of 100,000 cubic yards.
25% of
Cost Estimate
Permit
Grading, Geotechnical, and Landscaping
51 - 1,000 Cubic Yards
1,001 - 10,000 Cubic Yards
10,001 - 100,000 Cubic Yards
100,001 Cubic Yards or more
Grading Deposit Up to 100,000 Cubic Yards
100,001 Cubic Yards or more
Note: Security as a condition of the issuance of a grading permit per LACBC - Appendix J Grading, Section J103.7.1.

Grading Permit Fees - Based on Volume of Material Handled (Table 1-B) See general fees for all general fees which will or may be applied to grading permits.

Grading Permit Fees 1 to 50 Cubic Yards

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
NPDES - Erosion and
Sediment Control Plans
(ESCP)
See LACBC - Appendix J Grading, Section J110.8. 10% of
Grading Permit Fee
Permit
1 - 10,000 Cubic Yards $51.70 Day
10,001 - 100,000 Cubic Yards $258.50 Day
100,001 Cubic Yards or more $517 Day
Base Fee $644.11 Flat Fee
Base Fee $644.11 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 100 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 50 cubic yards.
$219.06 100 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $2,834.74 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 1,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 1,000 cubic yards.
$181.69 1,000 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $4,469.99 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 1,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 10,000 cubic yards.
$107.35 1,000 Cubic
Yard
Base Fee $15,204.98 Flat Fee
Plus a fee per 10,000 cubic yards (or fraction thereof) in excess of 100,000 cubic yards.
$296.72 10,000 Cubic
Yard
Grading Plan Check Fees - Based on Volume of Material Handled (Table 1-C) NPDES - Penalties for NonComplianceGrading Permit Volume Grading Plan Check Fees
51 - 1,000 Cubic Yards
1,001 - 10,000 Cubic Yards
10,001 - 100,000 Cubic Yards
100,001 Cubic Yards or more
Geotechnical Review & Geological or Engineering Report
Note: Payment of hourly plan check fees incurred for each review is required prior to the commencement of any subsequently required review.
1 to 50 Cubic Yards

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Geotechnical Site and/or
Study Review
Review by geotechnical engineer of geotechnical site review, building and grading plans and processing geological or engineering reports submitted pursuant to Section 110, 111, 113, or 1804.
$310.20 Hour
Geological Site Inspections
and/or Observations
Inspection or observation by city consultant geotechnical engineer.
$310.20 Hour
Landscape Plan Check Fee is per plan check. $319.51 Each New Multifamily Residential Buildings
For new multifamily residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three (3) or more living units not including garages, carports, and other non-commercial
automobiles storage areas constructed at the same time. $0.17 Square Foot
New Single Family and Two-Family Residential Buildings
For new single and two-family residential buildings not including garages, carports and other minor accessory
buildings constructed at the same time.
$0.34 Square Foot
Garages, Carports, and Other Accessory
For garages, carports, and other accessory buildings used in conjunction with multifamily residential buildings use and for other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings.

See Branch Circuit
Fee & Unit Fee
Schedules
System Fee Schedule (The following fees do not include permit application fee) New Residential Buildings Note: The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time.

For garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time as the single or two-family residential buildings a fee will not be required.

Landscape Plan Check Fee
Electrical Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
Electrical Permit Fees

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Electric Generators & Electrically Driven Rides $87.53 Each Mechanical Driven & Walk-Through
For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting.
$36.59 Each
System of Area & Booth Lighting $36.59 Each
Permanently Installed
For permanently installed rides, booths, displays, and
attractions.

See Unit Fee
Schedule
Temporary Service Power Pole or Pedestal
For a temporary service power pole or pedestal, including all pole or pedestal mounted receptacle outlets and
appurtenances.
$98.03 Each
Temporary Distribution System, Lighting, & Receptacles
Outlets (Construction Sites)
For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative lighting, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, sales booths, additional pole, etc.
$48.06 Each
1 - 10 branch circuits $38.94 Each
Each additional branch circuit (11 - 40) $32.38 Each
Each additional branch circuit (41 or more) $28.95 Each 15 or 20 Ampere 208 Volt to 277 Volt Lighting for 15 or 20 Ampere 208 Volt to 277 Volt Lighting
$61.34 Each
Note: Branch circuit fees apply to new branch circuit wiring and the lighting fixtures, switches and receptacles which are supplied by these branch circuits, including their outlets. 15 or 20 Ampere 120 Volt Lighting or General Use Receptacles.

Exception: An individual multiwire branch circuit supplying one appliance may be counted as one circuit.

Branch Circuit Fees
(Alternate to Unit Fees)
Note: Carnivals, circuses or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays, and attractions.

Carnivals and Circuses
Temporary Power Service
Branch Circuit & Unit Fee Schedules
Notes: 1. The following do not include permit issuance fee. 2. Where appropriate either fee schedule may be used.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
1 - 20 Outlets $4.83 Each
Each additional outlet (21 or more) $3.27 Each
Pole or Platform Mounted Lighting Fixtures $5.69 Each
Theatrical-Type Lighting Fixtures or Assemblies $5.69 Each 1 - 20 Fixtures $4.83 Each
Each additional fixtures (21 or more) $3.27 Each
Fixed Residential Appliances or Receptacle Outlets
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens, counter-mounted
cooking tops, electric ranges, self- contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners, space heaters, food waste grinders, dishwashers, washing machines, water heaters, clothes dryers, or other motor-operated appliances, not exceeding three (3) horsepower (HP) in rating.
$23.95 Each
Other Types of Air Conditioners & Motor-Driven Appliances For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings.

See Power
Equipment
Other Appliances of Three
Horsepower or Less
Non-Residential Appliances
For any appliance installed in a non-residential occupancy and not exceeding three (3) horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA) in rating, including medical and dental devices, food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets, illuminated showcases, drinking fountains, vending machines, laundry machines, or other similar types of equipment.

Note: As used in the above sentence, "non-residential
occupancy" includes but is not limited to hotels and motels. $34.80 Each
Lighting Fixtures, Sockets, or Other Lamp Holding Devices Lighting Fixtures
Residential Appliances of
Three Horsepower or Less
Unit Fees (Alternative to
Branch Circuit Fees)
Receptacle, Switch, Lighting, or Other
Notes: 1. For receptacle, switch, lighting, or other outlets at which current is used or controlled except services, feeders and meters. 2. For multi-outlet assemblies, each five feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Other Appliances of Three
Horsepower or Less
(Continued)
Other Types of Air Conditioners & Motor-Driven Appliances For other types of air conditioners and other motor driven appliances having larger electrical ratings.

See Power
Equipment
Rating: over 3 and up to 10 $44.79 Each
Rating: 11 - 50 $103.54 Each
Rating: 51 - 100 $193.65 Each
Rating: 101 or more $320.12 Each
Cable Trays, Trolley & Plug-In Type Busways
100 Feet or fraction thereof
$58.71 100 Feet
Single Branch Circuits
For signs, outline lighting systems, or marquees supplied from one branch circuit.
$87.53 Each
Additional Branch Circuits
For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system, or marquee.
$28.95 Each
600 Volts or Less & 399 Amperes or Less $87.53 Each
600 Volts or Less & 400 to 1,000 Amperes $171.43 Each
Over 600 Volts & Over 1,000 Amperes $364.91 Each
Power Equipment
Busways
Signs, Outline Lighting, &
Marquees
Services, Switchboards,
Switchboard Sections,
Motor Control Centers &
Panelboards
For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment, and other apparatus, with a rating as follows:

Notes:

1. Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR).

2. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used.

3. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contactors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment.)
Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in type busways. No fee is required for portable tools.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth. $146.96 Each
Each hour, or fraction thereof $246.03 Hour
Additional Inspections
For each extra inspection resulting from defective
workmanship or materials.
$74.44 Each
Surcharge Fee For any single hazardous location area, as defined by the provisions of Chapter 5 of the California Electrical Code, larger than 2,000 sq. ft or an aggregate area consisting of smaller hazardous location areas totaling over 2,000 sq. ft., a surcharge in addition to any other applicable fees.
$491.72 Each
For high voltage switchgears, transformers or substations. $1,135.36 Each 1 - 10 items $568.04 Flat Fee
11 - 20 items $1,135.39 Flat Fee
21 - 50 items $1,703.43 Flat Fee
51 or more items $1,893.13 Flat Fee
Flat fee up to 15 KW $449 Flat Fee
Above 15 KW (per Government Code § 66015) $15 KW
Flat fee up to 15 KW $449 Flat Fee
Above 15 KW (per Government Code § 66015) $15 KW
Photovoltaic System (PV) Residential (Not Solar APP+)
Solar APP+
Other Fees
Inspection Fee
Note: For inspection of electrical equipment for which no fee is herein set forth and for emergency inspections for the time consumed.

Investigation and Review
of Test Reports Reports with electrical items, apparatus, machine tools, appliances, or other electrical equipment:

Note: For investigation and review of test reports from local testing laboratories, or to comply with Section 83-3.

Miscellaneous Apparatus,
Conduits & Conductors
Note: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
The fee shall be equal to seventy percent (70%) of the
required electrical permit fee provided.
70% of Electrical
Permit Fee
($246.03 Minimum)
Permit
Additional Plan Checks
For additional plan checks required by beyond the first and second check of plans or reports, due to complexity of plans or changes, errors, omissions, or additions or revisions of approved or resubmitted plans.

Note: This does not include additional plan checks required due to scope of work changes.
$246.03 Hour
Tenant Improvement Plan
Check
The fee for each tenant improvement plan check (installations requiring review to verify compliance with the State's Electrical Energy Conservation requirements (Title 24), when a building plan check is not required for that work.
$30.67
($123.36 Minimum)
1,000 Square
Foot
Permanent Type Dishwasher
For each permanent-type dishwasher whether individually trapped or not.
$36.70 Each
Water Heater and/or Vent $36.70 Each
Water-Treating Equipment $36.70 Each
Backflow Prevention
Device
For each backflow-prevention device on unprotected water supplies, pools, tanks, vats, etc. (including incidental water piping).
$36.70 Each
Fire Sprinkler System &
Backflow Prevention
Device
For sprinkling systems on any one meter, each backflow
prevention device therefor.
$36.70 Each
Electrical Plan Checking Fees
Note: The Electrical Code requires plan check fees to be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications.

Plan Check
Plumbing Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
Plumbing Permit Fees
Appliances

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
1 - 5 Outlets $36.70 Each
Each additional outlet (6 or more) $9.31 Each
Medium or high-pressure system $150.92 Each
Additional fee for each outlet $9.31 Each
Gas Meter For each gas meter not under control and maintenance of the serving gas supplier.
$36.70 Each
Gas Pressure Regulator Gas Pressure Regulator other than Appliance Regulators. $36.70 Each Industrial Waste
Pretreatment Interceptor
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps.
$36.70 Each
Plumbing Fixtures or Trap For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including drainage vent, water piping and backflow prevention devices therefor), (hose bibbs are considered fixtures). $36.70 Each
1-1/2 inch or smaller $36.70 Each
2 - 3 inches $113.88 Each
3 inches or more $246.03 Each
Repair or Alteration of
Drainage and/or Vent
Piping
$36.70 Each
Replacement of Water
Piping, Fixtures, Water
Treatment Device, WaterUsing or Dispensing
Equipment, & Branch /
Risers
For replacing water piping in a building, (1) each fixture, each water treating device and each piece of water-using or
dispensing equipment, or (2) each branch or riser that has none of the above items connected thereto.
$15.17 Each
Roof Drain $36.70 Each
Potable Water
Note: For potable water not covered elsewhere in fee schedule.

Gas Piping System Low-Pressure System
Medium or High-Pressure System
Note: For each gas piping system on any one meter or alteration, extension or retest of existing gas piping system.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Solar Potable WaterHeating SystemSolar potable water-heating system, including water heater and vent.
$122.67 Each
Stacks or Branches -
Future
For future stacks or branches, each waste inlet. $19.99 Each Trap Primer $36.70 Each
Water Pressure Regulator $36.70 Each
Cesspool Cesspool, overflow seepage pit, percolation test pit, swimming pool drywell or drainfield extension or replacement.
$105.27 Each
Drainage or Sewer
Backwater Valve
$105.27 Each
Greywater System For each greywater system (storage tanks and disposal/irrigation fields).
$216.22 Each
Public Sewer Connection
For the connection of a house sewer to a public sewer, or for the extension of a house lateral onto the lot for future use (separate permit required for each such connection or
extension).
$105.27 Each
Additional Building or Work Connection
For the connection of each additional building or additional work to a house sewer.
$68.06 Each
Future Sewer Installation Connection
For each installation of a section of house sewer for future use.
$68.06 Each
House Sewer Manhole $105.27 Each
Sewer Disconnection, Abandonment, Alteration, or Repair Disconnection, abandonment, alteration or repair of any house sewer or private sewage disposal system or part
thereof.
$68.06 Each
Sewer Fees
Public Sewer

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Private Sewage Disposal System
For each private sewage disposal system (septic tank and seepage pits or pits and/or drainfield).
$216.22 Each
Private Sewage Disposal System Connection
For the connection of a house sewer to a private sewage disposal system.
$68.06 Each
Base Fee
The minimum plan checking fee shall be 40% of the plumbing permit fee, but not less than the required minimum.
40% of Plumbing
Permit Fee
($246.03 Minimum)
Permit
Additional Plan Checks
For additional plan checks required by beyond the first and second check of plans or reports, due to complexity of plans or changes, errors, omissions, or additions or revisions of approved or resubmitted plans.

Note: This does not include additional plan checks required due to scope of work changes.
$246.03 Hour
Combination waste and vent system $378.35 System
Gas system containing an earthquake actuated shut-off
valve
$132.15 System
Chemical waste system $75.29 System
Roof drain system $246.03 System
Plumbing Plan Check Fee
Note: A plan checking fee as indicated shall be paid to the Plumbing Official at the time of submitting plans and specifications for work described in this subsection. Said fee shall be equal to 40% of the required plumbing permit fee.

Plan Check Fee
Surcharge If any of the following systems is included in the work proposed, a surcharge shall be collected for each of these systems as follows:

Private Sewage Disposal
System

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Combination waste and vent systems $568.04 System
Gas system containing an earthquake actuated shut-off
valve
$188.99 System
Chemical waste system $113.88 System
Roof drain system $378.35 System
Grey water system $216.22 System
Up to 100,000 BTU $61.00 Each
100,001 BTU - 500,000 BTU $117.50 Each
500,001 BTU or more $294.49 Each
Air Inlet & Air Outlet
For each air inlet and air outlet served by any air-conditioning system.
$9.48 Each
Square Footage of Conditioned Space
When the number of air inlets and outlets are unknown, this fee is calculated per 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof of conditioned area.
$83.56 1,000 Square
Feet
Appliance Vent For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit.
$28.95 Each
Individual Systems For plan checking individual systems not required to be reviewed under Plumbing Code subsection 103.11.1.

Mechanical Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
Mechanical Permit Fees
Note: 1. For a refrigeration system rating; one horsepower, one ton or 12,000 BTU per hour shall mean the same quantity.

2. For steam boilers rated in boiler horsepower; one horsepower shall equal 50,000 BTU per hour.

Refrigeration Compressor
or Absorption Unit,
Furnace, Heater, Boiler, &
Vented Decorative
Appliance
For the installation, alteration or relocation of each refrigeration compressor or absorption unit, and for each fuel burning furnace, heater, boiler and vented decorative appliance including vents attached thereto:

Air Inlet & Air Outlet
Note: An air-conditioned system includes heating and/or cooling.

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
1 - 10 Units $28.95 Each
11 Units or more $8.95 Each
2,001 CFM - 10,000 CFM, each unit $87.53 Each
10,001 CFM or more, each unit $147.13 Each
Evaporative Cooler For each evaporative cooler other than portable type. $49.28 Each 1 - 10 Fans $36 Each
11 Fans or more $12.57 Each
Ventilation System For each ventilation system, which is not a portion of any airconditioning system for which a permit is required elsewhere in LACBC.
$76.15 Each
Commercial Kitchen Hood,
Spray Booth, and/or
Product Conveying Dust
System
For the installation of each commercial kitchen hood, spray booth or product conveying duct system, including the fans and ducts attached thereto.
$147.13 Each
Fire Damper For the installation of each fire damper. $23.77 Each Existing Duct System
Alteration
For the alteration of an existing duct system for which a permit is not required elsewhere in LACBC.
$61 Each
Up to 10 Appliances
The plan checking fee shall be 50% of the mechanical permit fee, but not less than the minimum.
50% of Mechanical
Permit Fee
($246.03 Minimum)
Permit
More than 10 Appliances
Fee for each additional appliance.

An Additional 5% of
Permit Fee
Each
Air Handling Unit
Plan Check Fee
Note: This fee shall not apply to an air handling unit which is a portion of a factory assembled airconditioning appliance for which a permit is required elsewhere in LACBC.

Note: Exception - Identical appliances of 100,000 BTU or less, installed in a single building.

Ventilation Fans (Single
Register)
Mechanical Plan Check Fee
Note: The Mechanical Code requires plan check fees to be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications.

Base Fee
For the installation or alteration of each air handling unit for air conditioning including ducts attached thereto:

Up to and including 2,000 CFM
More than 2,000 CFM

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
For additional plan checks required by beyond the first and second check of plans or reports, due to complexity of plans or changes, errors, omissions, or additions or revisions of approved or resubmitted plans.

Note: This does not include additional plan checks required due to scope of work changes.
$246.03 Hour
Food processing establishments containing a commercial
type I or II hood.
$378.35 Each
Garage ventilation systems required by the adopted Building Code.
$378.35 Each
Stair pressurization systems installed in compliance with provisions of the adopted Building Code.
$378.35 Each
Product conveying systems $378.35 Each
A commercial type I or II hood $568.04 Each
Garage ventilation systems $568.04 Each
Stairs pressurization systems $568.04 Each
Product conveying systems $551.49 Each
Plan Check Fee $123.36
Tenant improvement installations requiring review to verify (Minimum) compliance with the State's Energy Regulations, when a
building permit is not required for that work, the fee shall be:
$61
($123.36 Minimum)
1,000 Square
Feet of
Conditioned
Space
Plan Check Fee
(Continued)
Tenant Improvements
Installations of the following individual systems:

Additional Plan Check
Surcharge If any of the following systems is included in the work proposed, a surcharge shall be collected for each of these systems as follows:

Individual System

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Tenant Improvements
(Continued)
Additional Plan Checks
For additional plan checks required by beyond the first and second check of plans or reports, due to complexity of plans or changes, errors, omissions, or additions or revisions of approved or resubmitted plans.

Note: This does not include additional plan checks required due to scope of work changes.
$246.03 Hour

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Candidate Processing Fee is limited by the State. $25 Candidate Candidate Statement Fee Varies per election - set by the County of Los Angeles Registrar-Recorder's Office and the City. Estimates are charged in advance, but these are not binding.

Varies Application
Document Certification Certification of City Records $10 Document Initiative Processing Fee is limited by the State.

Refundable if, within one year of date of filing Notice of Intent, the City Clerk certifies sufficiency of petition.
$200 Initiative
Electronic Records No Charge Application
Hard Copies $0.10 Copy
Hard Copies - Oversized Direct Costs Application
USB/Flash - Electronic Records $8 Unit
Appeal of a Commission
Decision to City Council
(Non-Planning
Commission)
Administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs (such as newspaper publication, mailers, etc.)
Exceptions: See the Planning Division's Fee Schedules for fees associated with Planning Commission appeals.
$220
+ Direct Costs
Application
Public Records Request
City Clerk

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Business License Late Fee Applies to all business licenses except contractors. 20% per month beginning August 1 until a 100% cap is
reached.

Varies Application
Employee Fee This fee applies to all retail, service, and professional business licenses. See each business license type for
exceptions.
$5 Employee
Investigation Fee See LCFMC § 6.24.060. Investigation Fee $50 Investigation State of California CASp
Fee
$4 Application
Transfer Fee See LCFMC §6.24.110. License - Transferability $25 Transfer Retail Business License Base Fee
This fee includes the 1st Employee. The fee is charged per office and/or per location.
$100 Application
Base Fee
This fee includes the 1st Professional. The fee is charged per office and/or per location.
$160 Application
Each additional Professional after the 1st. $50 Professional Service Business License Base Fee
This fee includes the 1st Employee. The fee is charged per office and/or per location.
$160 Application
General: A or B $160 Application
Sub-Contractor: Class C $90 Application
Homeowner as Contractor Waived Application
Vehicle/Truck Decal (1st Decal) $15 Vehicle/Truck
Vehicle/Truck Decals (Each Additional) $5 Vehicle/Truck Home Occupation Full Time
See base fee under applicable Retail, Service, or Professional Business Licenses category.

Varies Application
Contractors
Retail, Service, & Professional Business Licenses
Community Development
Business License
General Business License Fees
Professional Business
License

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Home Occupation
(Continued)
Part Time
Under 20 hours per week
$25 Application
Billboard Advertising $100 Billboard
Multiple Coin Operated Machines (video game, vending
machine, etc.)
$25 Machine
Bus Bench Advertising $50 Bench
1-35 Students $50 Location
36-70 Students $100 Location
71-100 Students $150 Location
101-150 Students $200 Location
151+ Students $300 Location
Base Fee
This fee includes the 1st Licensed Agent/Broker. The fee is charged per office and/or per location.
$160 Application
Additional Licensed Agent/Broker $15 Agent/Broker
Recreation & Amusement Base Fee
This fee includes the 1st Employee.
$160 Application
Base Fee $100 Application
Seat Fee $1 Seat
Application Fee
See base fee under applicable Retail, Service, or Professional Business Licenses category.

Varies Application
Planning Division Review Deposit $4,500
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Processing Fee
Cost recovery fee for staff time on processing and issuing a film permit.
$400 Permit
Notification Fee
See "Notification Mailers/Postcards" under the Citywide Fee Schedule.

Refer to Citywide
Schedule
Notice
Right-of-Way (ROW) / Public Facility Use $1,500 Day
Miscellaneous Business
License Fees
Private School / Childcare
Real Estate Sale /
Brokerage & Insurance
Sales / Brokerage
Theaters
Adult Business License
Permits
Filming / Still Photography
Permit

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Filming / Still Photography
Permit (Continued)
Traffic Engineer Review $250 Hour
Processing Fee Waived Permit
Notification Fee
See "Notification Mailers/Postcards" under the Citywide Fee Schedule.

Refer to Citywide
Schedule
Notice
Right-of-Way (ROW)/City Property Use $1,500 Day
Part Time
Under 20 hours per week
$25 Application
One-time fee for home occupation permit (full and part time businesses).
$25 Application
New permit: Direct cost at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs plus the permit fee.
$480
+ Direct Costs
Application
Annual Renewal $45 Renewal
Business License See Service
Business License
Category
Application
Planning Division Review Deposit (Required) $2,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Permit Fee $100 Permit
Vendor ID Card $5 ID Card
Permit Fee $160 Permit
Vendor ID Card $5 ID Card
Year 1 $50 License
Year 2-5 Consecutive year of successful compliance. $25 License Year 5+ consecutive year of successful compliance. Waived License Solicitation Permit
Student Filming / Still
Photography Permit
(Academic Purpose)
Massage Establishment
Operator Permit
Home Occupation
Exemption: May be exempt with proof of 501(c)(3) status and proof that the organization is local and volunteer-based.

Sidewalk Vendor Permit
Tobacco Retail License

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Major
New construction or major change to structure, architecture, or site design.
100% of Original
Application Fee
Application
Minor
Change to a condition of approval, minor architectural or site change.
50% of Original
Application Fee
Application
Appeal to Planning Commission
50% of the original application fee plus public noticing fee. 50% of Original
Application Fee
($1,000 Maximum)
+ Direct Costs
Appeal
Appeal of a Planning Commission decision to the City Council 50% of the original application fee plus public noticing fee. 50% of Original
Application Fee
($1,000 Maximum)
+ Direct Costs
Appeal
When work is performed by city staff a flat fee per application is required.
$1,250 Application
Deposit
When work is performed by a consultant, a deposit (for the full contract cost) is required.

Deposit Application
Administration Fee
Plus a 20% fee for administration and processing services. 20% of the Deposit Application
Deposit
When work is performed by a consultant, a deposit (for the full contract cost) is required.

Deposit Report
Administration Fee
Plus a 20% fee for administration and processing services. 20% of the Deposit Application
California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)
General Fees
Amendment to Previously
Approved Permit
Appeals
(Mitigated) Negative Declaration - Review Performed by City Staff (Mitigated) Negative Declaration - Review Performed by an Outside Consultant Environmental Impact Report
Planning

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Notice of Exemption (AB 130) $600 Notice
Notice of Exemption (non-AB 130) $300 Notice
Certification of Compliance Request for a Certificate of Compliance per the state Subdivision Map Act.
$400 Application
Code Enforcement
Inspection
$100 Inspection
When an outside consultant's services are utilized for review or analysis of a project or a portion of a project. Subject to a Reimbursement Agreement. Any funds remaining at the
completion of the contract shall be returned to applicant.

Deposit Project
Administration Fee
Plus a 20% fee for administration and processing services. 20% of the Deposit Application
Developer Requested
Continuance
Request fee, public notice fee, and any other direct costs. $290 + Direct Costs
Request
Development agreement deposit. $5,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Agreement
Application Fee $2,000 Application
Tree Protection during Development Activity
Review of compliance with private tree protection ordinance. $250 Application
Zoning Letter for Planning Division on specific lot or issue. $270 Letter / Director’s Written Determination Determination
Interpretation of provision for zoning codes.
$270 Application
Building Setback Modification, Height Modification, Residential Sport Court/Batting Cage Permit (Unlighted), Chicken Coop Waiver, Pool/Spa Equipment Encroachment, Flat Roof, Yard Equipment, Pedestrian Entries, RV Parking, Roof Equipment, Front Yard Landscaping, Terracing, Personal Wireless
Facilities Microcells or Minor Facilities Additions Not in Residential Single Family or Open Space Zones, and Parking Lot as a Transitional Use, Semi-Circular Driveways
$530 Application
Recreational Vehicle Storage/Parking $200 Application
California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)
(Continued)
Director’s Determination
Director’s Review
Notice of Exemption
Consultant Deposit
Development Agreement

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Application Fee $2,000 Application
Density Bonus Agreement Deposit $2,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Agreement
Finding of Conformance with General Plan
Planning Commission review required by State law – public right-of-way vacations, outside agency projects.
$500 Review
Amendment $5,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Certificate of Appropriateness
To modify historic resources.
$250 Application
Modification of Official Register
Addition to or removal from the Official Register of Historic Properties plus any direct costs (e.g. public noticing fees). $500
+ Direct Costs
Application
Mills Act Request for Mills Act contract. $610 Application Multiple Application
Process
Single project with multiple applications: the highest
application fee will be charged at 100% and subsequent
applications will be charged at 50%.

Varies Application
New application for an
expired approved
application
Where submitted within 1 year of previous approval expiration date and there are no changes to the plans.

This fee will be charged at 50% of application fees plus applicable noticing and CEQA fees.
50% of Original
Application
+ Direct Costs
Application
Overhead Utility Appeal Appeal of requirement to install utilities underground when property is development with a new or relocated main
building, or residential building converted to a non-residential use, or remodeling, alteration or addition to an existing commercial building involving an expense totaling 25% of greater of the market value.
$500 Application
Personal Indoor Cultivation
of Marijuana Permit
Permit fee $530 Permit
Historic Preservation
Exception: Fees associated with the removal from the official register will be waived when the addition to the register was initiated by the City.

Density Bonus Agreement
(per State Law)
General Plan

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Project Monitoring This fee is to conduct monitoring to ensure compliance with conditions of approval and/or environmental compliance per CEQA.
$1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Design Review – Architectural $75 Application
Director’s Review, Hillside (Director), & Tree Removal $100 Application Condo Conversion, Fence Review, TUP (Major), Excessive
Animal, & Telecommunications
$150 Application
Planned Development, Second Floor Review, CUP, Floor
Area Review, Hillside (Planning Commission), Tentative Map, Setback Modification (Planning Commission), Variance, Lot Line Adjustment, Large Garage, & Floor Area.
$750 Application
General Plan Amendment or Specific Plan Amendment
Per Public Hearing required noticing.
$750 Public Hearing
General Plan Zone Change
Per Public Hearing required noticing
$600 Public Hearing
SB 35 - Preliminary
Review/Notice of Intent
Processing SB 35 preliminary review/notice of intent. $1,540 Application Application Fee $10,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Amendment $7,500
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Streamlined Ministerial
Review Application
Processing of streamlined ministerial review application for qualifying multifamily and mixed use, including SB 35.
$4,515 Application
Substantial Conformance
Finding
Application fee to determine that project revisions remain consistent with original approval.
$320 Application
Time Extension For existing entitlements $100 Application Zone Change Application fee for Amendment of Zoning Code text or Zoning Map.
$4,955 Application
New Permit $165 Application
Renewal Permit $30 Application
Excessive Animal Permit Permit fee $165 Application
Public Noticing Fee
Specific Plan
Permits
Animal Keeping
Registration

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Administrative Hearing Application Fee $1,440 Application Director Review Application Fee $465 Application
Planning Commission Review Application Fee $4,515 Application Personal Wireless Service
Facilities
Application Fee $2,905 Application
Major or Master $740 Application
Minor $50 Application
Removal Permit $100 Application
12″ to 23″ $354 Tree
24″ to 35″ $705 Tree
36″ or greater $3,600 Tree
12″ to 23″ $1,062 Tree
24″ to 35″ $2,115 Tree
36″ or greater $10,800 Tree
Annexation Review $5,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Review
Major - New structure $4,515 Application
Minor - Use within an existing structure $1,540 Application Condominium Conversion
Review
Application Fee $6,195 Application
Application Fee $750 Application
Contractor Deposit $1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Sign Only $400 Application
Tree Replacement Fund
Tree Restitution
Exemption: LCF local bona fide 501(c)(3) non-profit entities per Resolution No. 14-12.

Trees
Temporary Use Permit
Design Review
Hillside Development
Permit
Reviews
Conditional Use Permit

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Merger (subject to Reimbursement Agreement)
Actual cost of reviewer at $160/hour with a $1000 deposit $1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Tentative Map/Parcel Map/Final Map/SB (Urban Lot Split
(subject to Reimbursement Agreement)
Actual cost of reviewer at $180/hour with a $2000 deposit. $2,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Engineering Review for
Planning Applications
Applicable to all planning applications review fee.

Exceptions | Reviews requiring Engineering Deposit and the following: Conditional Use Permit, Minor Development
Agreement Design Review, Architectural Design Review, Sign Director’s Written Determination, Excess Animal, Home
Occupation Permit, Personal Indoor Cultivation of Marijuana, DUSP DVSP Directors Review, Mills Act Appeals Reasonable Accommodation, Tree Removal Temporary Use Permit, Minor Zoning Clearance, Director's Review (Pool Equipment)
$140 Application
Extra Plan Checks,
Inspections, and Meetings
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.

Direct Costs Application
Floor Area Review $2,905 Application
Large Garage Review $500 Application
Legal Review Deposit for outside legal costs and direct costs. $2,000 (Minimum Deposit)
Application
Application Fee $75 Application
Zoning Clearance - Non-Discretionary
Applicable to brand new non-discretionary Single Family Residential or addition over 1,000 Square Feet.
$375 Application
Preliminary Review - NonDiscretionary ProjectApplication Fee $275 Application Director’s Review $530 Application
Planning Commission Review $2,905 Application
Consultant Plan Check
Planning Zoning Clearance
Second Floor Review

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Setback Modification Planning Commission Review
Note: See director's review section for setback modifications requiring a director's review.
$2,905 Application
Application Fee $405 Application
Deposit equal to the value of the work not yet completed. Direct Costs Application Variance Application Fee $2,905 Application
Application Fee $1,500 Application
Deposit $1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Deposit
Application Fee $5,700 Application
Application Fee $1,500 Application
Deposit $1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Deposit
Application Fee $11,395 Application
Tentative Map Time
Extension
Application Fee $4,135 Application
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map $6,195 Application
Vesting Tentative Tract Map $10,000
(Minimum Deposit)
+ Direct Costs
Application
Lot Line Adjustment Application Fee $1,000 Application
Lot Merger Application Fee $200 Application
Tract Map
Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy Agreement
Parcel & Tract Maps
Lot Adjustments
Parcel Map Final Parcel Map
Vesting Tentative Parcel &
Tract Maps
Tentative Tract Map
Tentative Parcel Map
Final Tract Map

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Reversion to Acreage $5,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
Application Fee $1,500 Application
Deposit
Review of final subdivision map
$1,000
(Minimum Deposit)
Application
SB 9 Urban Lot Split

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Accessibility Placard
Citation Dismissal
Citation Limited by State Law $25 Citation
Unaltered Dog $50 Dog
Unaltered Dog - Seniors $25 Dog
Spayed / Neutered Dog $25 Dog
Spayed / Neutered Dog - Seniors $8 Dog
30 Days - Late Charge Penalty $30 Dog
60 Days - Late Charge Penalty $75 Dog
No License: Citation issued will result in a Municipal Code Violation. See LCFMC § 4.08.030.

Municipal Code
Violation
Violation
Light Poles No Charge Application
Parking Lot No Charge Application
Removal of banner by the city Direct Costs Banner
DUI Cost Recovery Administration fee plus charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $95 + Direct Cost to the State Set Minimum.
$95
+ Direct Costs
Response
First Response No Charge Response
Second and Subsequent Responses
Direct costs of all responding personnel.

Direct Costs Response
Permit No Charge Application
Display Hanger $1.50 Hanger
First 3 Alarms
In a 12 Month Period
No Charge Alarm
Administrative Fee $50 Alarm
Fine $100 Alarm
Administrative Fee $100 Alarm
Fine $200 Alarm
Loud Party Response
Parking Permit
Fourth Alarm
Fifth Alarm
Policy and Executive Management
Animal Control
Banner Permit
Police False Alarm
Response

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Administrative Fee $150 Alarm
Fine $500 Alarm
Police False Alarm Sixth and Subsequent Alarms
Response (Continued)

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Industrial Waste Fees Annual fee collected by LACDPW on behalf of the City for commercial inspections.

See Rate Sheet See Rate
Sheet
Newsrack Registration One-time newsrack registration fee per LCFMC § 6.30.025(D). $65 Newsrack National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES)
Development Review
Review of drainage related to NPDES compliance impacting the public right of way for new development and
redevelopment projects.
$250 Project
Adoption of City Tree Review fee $175
+ Direct Costs
Tree
Amend Official Map of City
Trees for Entire Street
Block
Public Work's administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs (such as newspaper publication).
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application
Removal of City Tree
Application
Administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs.
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application
Removal of City Tree &
Replacement with Different
Species Application
Administrative review fee, public notice fee, and any direct costs.
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application
Response Private
Vegetation / Tree Fee
Response to private vegetation and/or tree caused by failed response by residents to address a public safety issue or downed private tree.

Direct Costs Occurrence
Less than 12" $1,250 Incident
12" to 23" $1,770 Incident
4" to 35" $3,525 Incident
36" or greater $18,000 Incident
Trunk Diameter Unknown: Estimated to be under 36" $9,000 Incident Trunk Diameter Unknown: Estimated to be over 36" $18,000 Incident Tree Restitution: Right-ofWay (ROW) Trees
Public Works
City Trees

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Construction & Demolition
(C&D)
C&D Administration Review
Administration fee for monitoring compliance with C&D
requirements per LCFMC § 9.14.
$210 Project
C&D Performance Security
Refundable Performance Security upon demonstration of
compliance with LCFMC § 9.14.

See Municipal Code Project
Haul Route Review
Administrative fee for reviewing haul route plan.
$85 Plan
Monitoring
A deposit is required prior to permit issuance for self-haul monitoring.
$2,500
(Minimum Deposit) +
Direct Costs
Project
First 3 hours $2 Hour
Each hour after the first 3 hours $5 Hour
Encroachment Permit Fee
Review of permit application and related plans for private development improvements in public right of way such as curb, gutter, sidewalk, parkway drain, and driveway approach improvements.
$250 Permit
Utility
Permit fee per location/address.
$175 Location /
Address
Inspection Fee
Inspection fee per permit for inspection(s) of construction activity.
$250 Permit
Temporary Encroachment Permit
Temporary trash bins in the public right of way.
$55 Permit
For any encroachment permit where there is excavation, this fee is for the first 100 linear feet, or portion thereof. $175 100 Linear
Feet
For each additional 100 linear feet, or portion thereof. $155 100 Linear Feet
Encroachment Permit
Electric Vehicle Charging
Stations
Excavation Review Fee
Construction Review, Inspection, and Permits
Construction & Demolition
(C&D) (Continued)
C&D Self-Haul

Service/Fee Title Fee Description Fee Unit
Issuance of encroachment agreement for vertical structures. $250 Issuance Issuance of covenant for flat work. $250 Issuance
Appeal of Director's Encroachment Decision
Administrative fee and engineering review fee for appeal of Director's decision to the Public Works and Traffic
Commission per LCFMC § 8.02.120.
$530 Appeal
Public Works Private
Development Review Fee
Initial review of engineering plans for private development. $175 Permit Maintenance Fee
Fee collected on behalf of LA City Sanitation for Sewer District 3A for increased flow volumes.

See LA City
Sanitation District
Fees
New
Connection
Connection Fee
Fee collected on behalf of LA City Sanitation for Sewer District 3A for new sewer connections.

See LA City
Sanitation District
Fees
New
Connection
Street / Right-of-Way
(ROW) Vacation Review
Engineering review and preparation of documents. $525 Project Traffic Engineering Review
Fee
For permits where traffic engineering review is required, such as encroachment permits, film permits, and transportation permits.
$250 Permit
Single Trip - Application review fee. $16 Permit
Annual Trip - Application review fee $90 Permit
Transportation Permit Fee
Sewer Service Fee (District
3A)
Private Encroachment in
Right-of-Way (ROW)

Fee Title Fee Description Original Fee Description
Appeals Staff Decision to the City
Manager
$220 +
Direct Costs
$100 +
Direct Costs
Application Fee reduced as this appeal
does not require public noticing.

Development
Permit/Cases
$68.00 $70.00 Application 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

B&S Trade Permit $42.00 $43.50 Application 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

Encroachment Permit $43.00 $44.50 Application 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

Encroachment Permit
(Trash Bin)
$37.00 $38.00 Application 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

Fee Title Fee Description Original Fee Description
Group $120.00 $124.00 Hour 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

LCF Based Organization
with Unpaid Staff
$70.00 $72.00 Hour 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

Auditorium Manager $75.00 $77.50 Hour 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

Auditorium Technician $54.00 $56.00 Hour 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

Base Fee $270.00 $279.00 Reservation 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

LCF Based Groups $117.00 $121.00 Reservation 3.4% CPI rate adjustment for increased cost.

Fee Amount & Unit
Proposed Modification to Existing Fees
Citywide Fees
Fee Amount & Unit
Innovation Fee
(Cost for future
equipment and
software updates)
Administration Fees
Lanterman
Auditorium -
Hourly Use Rates
Lanterman
Auditorium - Staff
Rates
Lanterman
Auditorium -
Capital
Improvement Use
Rates

Description

3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

3.4% CPI rate adjustment for
increased cost.

Fee Title Fee Description Original Fee Description
(Mitigated) Negative
Declaration: Reviewed
performed by city staff.
$1,000.00 $1,250.00 Application Fee increase is for the Native American tribal notification is
now required and uploading of
final document to state
CEQANet portal.

Notice of Exemption
(Non-AB 130)
$200.00 $300.00 Notice Fee increase is to recover costs for staff time due to exemptions
now being required to be
uploaded to the state's
CEQANet portal.

Design Review Application Fee $750 Application
+ $1,000
Deposit
$750.00 Application This fee no longer requires a
deposit, therefore, is now a flat
fee to recover the cost of staff
time.

Public Noticing
Fee
General Plan
Amendment or Specific
Plan Amendment
$600.00 $750.00 Public Hearing Fee increased to recover the cost of staff time as additional
noticing required per SB 18 for
Native American Tribal
Consultation.

Building & Safety Fees
Planning Fees
Fee Amount & Unit
Building & Residential Code Permit & Plan Check Fees including grading, geotechnical, and landscape.

Fee Title
Electrical Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
Mechanical Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
Plumbing Code Permit and Plan Check Fees
California
Environmental
Quality Act
(CEQA)

Fee Title Fee Description Original Fee Description
National Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System (NPDES)
Development
Review
$250 Deposit +
Direct Costs
$250.00 Project This fee no longer requires a
deposit, therefore, it is now a flat
fee to recover the cost of staff
time.

Amend Official Map of
City Trees for Entire
Street Block
$220 + Direct
Costs
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application Fee increased to recover the
cost of staff time to amend the
official map of city trees.

Removal of City Tree
Application
$220 + Direct
Costs
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application Fee increased to recover the
cost of staff time to process the
application.

Removal of City Tree &
Replacement with
Different Species
Application
$220 + Direct
Costs
$550
+ Direct Costs
Application Fee increased to recover the
cost of staff time to process the
application.

Encroachment
Permit -
Excavation Review
First 100 linear feet. $155.00 $175.00 100 Linear Feet Fee increased to recover the cost of staff time to process the
application.

Agreement for Vertical
Structures
$175.00 $250.00 Issuance Fee increased to recover the
cost of staff time and the traffic
engineering review.

Covenant for Flat Work $175.00 $250.00 Issuance Fee increased to recover the cost of staff time and the traffic
engineering review.

Public Works Fees
Fee Amount & Unit
Private
Encroachment in
Right-of-Way
(ROW)
City Tree

Fee Title Fee Description Original Fee Description
Street / Right-ofWay (ROW)
Vacation Review
Engineering review and
preparation of
documents.
$250 +
Direct Costs
$525.00 Project This fee no longer requires a
deposit, therefore, it is now a flat
fee to recover the cost of staff
time.

Traffic Engineering
Review Fee
$250.00 / Hour $250.00 Permit This fee is no longer an hourly fee and is now a flat fee to
recover the cost of staff time.

Fee Amount & Unit

Fee Title Fee Description
Notary Public
Service
Fee is limited by the
State (Subject to change
by State action)
$15.00 Signature
Sewer Covenant
Review
$250.00 Application
Fee Title Fee Description
Rate Surcharge:

Exclusive Use
(Non-Performance Rate)
1/3 Rate
Surcharge of
Base Rental
Cost
Day
Refundable User
Damage Deposit
$100.00 Event
Fee Title Fee Description
Construction
Placard
$20.00 Each
Fee Title Fee Description
For processing and
recording a Notice of
Violation pursuant to
Section 103.4.
$762.97 Violation
Rescission of Notice of
Violation:

For processing and
recording a Rescission of
Notice of Violation
pursuant to Section
103.4.
$656.34 Violation
Lanterman
Auditorium
Fee Amount & Unit
Notice of Violation
Building & Safety Fees
Fee Amount & Unit
Fee Amount & Unit
Remove these from the fee schedule as it’s a
code enforcement fine per LCF Municipal Code
§103.4.

Description
Remove this fee as non-performance and
performance services are not billed at separate
rates.

Remove this fee as the city no longer collects a
damage deposit.

Remove this fee as it was removed from the
Building Code in 2026.

Description
Description
Remove this fee as the City does not collect this
fee.

Remove this fee as the service is no longer
provided.

Citywide Fees
Administration Fees
Fee Amount & Unit Description
Proposed Removal of Fees

Fee Title Fee Description
Mail List $150.00 Printout
A/B: 8.5 x 11 & 11×17 $2.50 Printout
C/D Plain: 17×22 &
22×34
$20.00 Printout
C/D Glossy: 17×22 &
22×32
$30.00 Printout
E Plain: 34×44 $27.50 Printout
E Glossy: 34×44 $240.00 Printout
Home Occupation
Permit
$65.00 Application
Fence Review Application fee $420.00 Application
Fee Title Fee Description
Animal Control Pet Grooming Services $125.00 Dog
DUI Cost
Recovery
$95
+ Direct Costs
Response
Fee Title Fee Description
C&D Administration Fees
(Roof/Addition/ Remodel)
$100.00 Project
C&D Administration Fees
(Full Demolition/Large
Commercial)
$210.00 Project
Fee Amount & Unit
Fee Amount & Unit
Construction &
Demolition Permit
Description
Remove this fee as it is not a service the city
contracts with the vendor for.

Remove this fee due to the complexity, rate of
DUI conviction, and required staff time involved
in collecting it.

Description
Remove these fees as they are being combined
and replaced with a new fee.

Fee Amount & Unit
GIS Printouts
Description
Remove this fee as the service has not been
requested and GIS is available to the public with
no charge online.

Remove this fee as the service has not been
requested.

Remove this fee as it was removed from the
Zoning Code.

Policy & Executive Management Fees
Planning Fees
Public Works Fees

Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk $175.00 Permit
Curb/Parkway Drain $90.00 Permit
Driveway Approach $175.00 Permit
Temporary Parking $176.00 Permit
Private Encroachment in
Right-of-Way (ROW)
without Agreement
$175.00 Permit
<$100,000 Valuation $3,000 Deposit
+ Direct Costs
Project
$100,000.01 - $500,000
Valuation
$3,500 Deposit
+ Direct Costs
Project
$500,000.01 -
$1,000,000 Valuation
$4,000 Deposit
+ Direct Costs
Project
$1,000,000.01+
Valuation
$4,500 Deposit
+ Direct Costs
Project
Street Renaming Processing $250
+ Direct Costs
Project Remove this fee as it is not a service that is
requested.

Encroachment
Permit
Public
Improvement Plan
Check
Remove these fees as they are being combined
and replaced with a new fee.

Remove this fee as deposits are no longer
utilized for this service and are being replaced
with a new fee.

Fee Title Fee Description
California
Environmental
Quality Act
(CEQA)
Notice of Exemption (AB
130)
$600 Notice
Fee Title Fee Description
Construction &
Demolition
C&D Administration
Review
$210 Project
Encroachment
Permit Fee
Review of permit
application and related
plans for private
development
improvements in public
right of way such as
curb, gutter, sidewalk,
parkway drain, and
driveway approach
improvements.
$250 Permit
Public Works
Private
Development
Review Fee
Initial Review of
engineering plans for
private development.
$175.00 Permit This fee replaces the existing Public
Improvement Plan Check Fees since a deposit is
no longer required.

Public Works Fees
Planning Fees
Proposed New Fees
Description
This fee is to recover costs of staff time as AB130 requires notification of approximately 16 Native American tribal members, consultation
were requested and uploading of Notice of
Exemption to state CEQANet portal.

Description
This fee replaces the existing two C&D
Administration Review Fees for Roof/Additions/
Remodels and Full Demolition/Large
Commercial. The fee will remain to be a flat rate
per project.

This fee replaces the existing four fees for
Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk, Curb/Parkway Drain,
Driveway Approach, and Temporary Parking
Permit. The fee will remain to be a flat rate per
project.

Fee Amount & Unit
Fee Amount & Unit

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: August 4, 2026
Subject: Discussion and Direction Regarding the Future Operation of Lanterman Auditorium
Presenter: Arabo Parseghian, Assistant City Manager
Proposed Action: Motion to direct staff to continue discussions with the La Cañada Unified School District regarding the return of operational responsibility for Lanterman Auditorium to the District, remove the Auditorium from future joint-use arrangements, and return to the City Council with a proposed transition plan, financial analysis, implementation schedule, and any necessary agreement amendments.

Environmental Impact:

This discussion and direction item is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines because it directs staff to evaluate future operational and contractual options and does not approve a physical project or change in use.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with providing direction to staff. Returning operational responsibility to the School District could reduce the City's future operating, staffing, and maintenance costs, and will reduce liability and capital improvement obligations. If the City were to decide to retain operational control, a more sustainable staffing model and a long-term funding strategy for operations, accessibility improvements, deferred maintenance, and major capital projects will be required. This could include reducing operating hours to support realistic staffing models.

Historically, Auditorium operations have generally operated near break-even, with some fiscal years ending in a deficit.

Background:

Lanterman Auditorium is owned by the La Cañada Unified School District and is operated by the City under the parties' joint-use relationship. The City administers public rentals, coordinates facility use, collects fees, provides event and technical staffing, and supports routine operations and maintenance.

Over the past year, City and District staff have discussed whether operational responsibility should return to the District to better align facility ownership with operations, maintenance, capital planning, and long-term risk. These discussions have also occurred as the parties consider the future structure of their broader joint-use relationship.

The Auditorium serves a small population of local schools and community members; however, a substantial share of current use is attributable to nonlocal organizations, including for-profit dance companies, theater groups, and other professional users that rent the facility because its rates are comparatively affordable.

Discussion/Analysis:

Current Operating Model
The current model places day-to-day operational responsibility with the City, even though the District owns the facility. This arrangement creates long-term challenges related to staffing, deferred maintenance, accessibility, capital funding, liability, and the appropriateness of City investment in an asset it does not own.

Financial Analysis
Auditorium operations generally break even or operate at a modest deficit, depending on annual rental activity, staffing costs, maintenance expenses, and unplanned repairs. Rental revenues help offset operating costs, but they do not create a reliable funding source for major capital improvements or accessibility upgrades.

Fiscal Year Operating Revenue Operating
Expenditures
Net Surplus/(Deficit)
FY [2026-27] $180,310.00 $243,810.00 ($63,500.00)
FY [2025-26] $190,400.00 $177,830.00 $12,570.00
FY [2024-25] $177,786.00 $186,543.00 ($8,757.00)
FY [2023-24] $203,383.00 $174,712.00 $28,671.00
FY [2022-23] $187,218.00 $191,330.00 ($4,112.00)
Average $151,793.00 $194,845.00 ($7,025.00)
• Average Annual City staff cost: $135,624.00 (for auditorium staff only; this does not include staff at City Hall who also support the program but are not funded through the program) • Average annual rental revenue: $151,793.00

• Average annual operating surplus/(deficit): ($7,025.00) The principal financial concern is that the current model may cover routine operations in stronger rental years but does not generate sufficient reserves for major building systems, deferred maintenance, or ADA-related improvements. Continuing the current arrangement would therefore require a clearer allocation of capital responsibility and a dedicated funding strategy since the facility does not meet current accessibility standards. In addition, City staff receive complaints from members of the public regarding the lack of ADA seating and the entrance path. These improvements would be costly and include the remaining challenge of funding capital improvements made to a facility that the City does not own.

Rental Usage Statistics For FY2025-26
Available operational experience indicates that a significant portion of Auditorium use is attributable to LCF and non-LCF organizations, including for-profit organizations focused on dance groups, theater companies, and other professional users. These organizations often select the facility because its rates are affordable relative to comparable venues, allowing them to reduce production costs and improve event profitability.

User Category Total Number of Rental Hours % of Total Rentals LCF-based nonprofit/community
groups
77 10%
LCF-based for-profit 134 17%
LCUSD/school-related users 135 18%
LCF-based private schools 161 21%
Non-LCF-based groups 255 34%
Total 762 100%
Known Major Facility Improvements
Lanterman Auditorium is an aging facility with several known or anticipated capital needs. Currently, the facility requires the replacement of the entire stage floor. However, due to funding challenges, a remedial repair - a comprehensive sanding of the stage floor - is taking place, which will delay the full replacement of the floor. The project is being funded by the District and the City at a 50% split with a total estimated cost of $34,500.

The list below is preliminary and should be supplemented by a formal facility condition assessment

and cost estimates in the future.

Improvement Current Condition /
Need
Preliminary Cost Potential Responsible
Party*
Roof replacement Aging roof requiring
replacement to address
long-term water intrusion
risk.
$1.3 M – $2.3 M Shared
HVAC system The facility lacks a
comprehensive HVAC
system suitable for
current public assembly
expectations.
$3.3 M–$6.0 M Shared
Exterior wall repairs Repairs are needed to
prevent water intrusion
and recurring leaks.
$700,000–$1.6 M Shared
Restroom modernization Restrooms are outdated
and may require
functional, accessibility,
and finish upgrades.
$800,000–$1.6 M Shared
Seating replacement Existing wooden chairs
are aging and may
require replacement or
major rehabilitation.
$1.0 M–$1.9 M Shared
ADA compliance
improvements
The facility is not fully
ADA compliant and may
require substantial
improvements to paths
of travel, seating,
restrooms, stage access,
and related features.
$1.5 M Shared
Stage floor replacement The stage floor received
an interim repair
because funding was
unavailable for full
replacement; a future
permanent replacement
remains necessary.
$475,000–$950,000 Shared

The estimated ADA compliance cost is at least $1.5 M and may increase depending on the final scope, required path-of-travel upgrades, restroom modifications, stage access, seating changes, design costs, and related code requirements. Continued public operation by the City may increase exposure to accessibility complaints or claims, while neither agency currently has a dedicated funding source for the full improvement program.
*It is important to highlight that the City does not own the property, and any improvements made to the property do not remain in the City’s ownership but become part of the LCUSD property since it is attached to the property that they own. This, combined with financial limitations from the Joint Use model, limits any significant improvement plans from being incorporated.

Staffing Challenges
The City's current staffing structure is not sustainable as a permanent model. Auditorium work requires specialized knowledge of theatrical lighting, sound, stage operations, and facility systems, but the positions are event-driven and do not provide guaranteed hours.

The model has remained workable largely because key Auditorium personnel are also employed by the School District, which provides them with more consistent work and greater familiarity with the facility. This is an unusual circumstance that will most likely not be replicable when current employees leave. A future recruitment may require the City to choose between materially increasing guaranteed staffing costs based on a fixed schedule and relying on contracted technical services, which is likely to significantly increase the auditorium's operational costs and/or reduce the number of days available for rent.

Option 1: Return Auditorium Operations to the District
Under this option, staff would continue discussions with LCUSD regarding the transfer of operational responsibility back to the District and removal of the Auditorium from future joint-use arrangements.

A transition plan would address existing reservations, deposits, staffing, records, equipment, maintenance responsibilities, insurance, liability, public access, and determine an effective transition date.

This option would require thorough planning and coordination between the two agencies. Therefore, the earliest expected transfer would take place on July 1, 2027 for FY 2027-28. Staff recommends this option.

Option 2: Renegotiate the Agreement and Maintain City Operations Under this option, the City would continue operating the Auditorium under a substantially revised agreement as part of the new broader JUA agreement. Any revised agreement should address capital cost allocation, ADA improvements, minimum District financial participation, staffing, rental rates, cost recovery, commercial use policies, insurance, liability, facility condition assessments, capital reserves, and long-term governance.

Continuing the present arrangement without significant changes would not resolve the identified financial, staffing, capital, ownership, and accessibility challenges. The City anticipates needing cooperation from CJPIA to assess the most pressing areas of risk to the City. While final recommendations are not complete, CJPIA staff toured the facility in late July.

Options:

1. Direct staff to continue discussions with LCUSD regarding returning operational responsibility for

Lanterman Auditorium back to the District, removing the Auditorium from future joint-use arrangements, and returning with a proposed transition plan and necessary agreements; or

2. Direct staff to negotiate a revised agreement that maintains City operation and addresses financial responsibility, staffing, ADA improvements, maintenance, capital investment, liability, rental policies, and long-term governance; or

3. Direct staff to continue the existing operating arrangement without material changes; or

4. Provide an alternative direction.

Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council take the following action(s): Direct staff to continue discussions with the La Cañada Unified School District regarding returning operational responsibility for Lanterman Auditorium back to the District, removing the Auditorium from future joint-use arrangements, and returning to the City Council with a proposed transition plan, financial analysis, implementation schedule, and any necessary agreements or amendments.

Attachments:

None

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: August 4, 2026
Subject: Discussion Regarding Hybrid Meetings for the City's Commissions and Committees and Provide Direction to Staff as Appropriate Presenter: Tania Garcia, City Clerk
Proposed Action: It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:

Receive and file a presentation regarding potential implementation of hybrid meetings for City Commissions and Committees and provide direction to staff as appropriate.

Environmental Impact: N/A
Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact at this time, but if the City Council decides to pursue offering hybrid meetings for all Commissions and Committees, there will be a staffing cost as outlined in a Council Consideration Item during the Fiscal Year 2026-27 annual budget discussions.

Background:

On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill No. 707 (“SB 707”), which revises and updates the Ralph M. Brown Act’s open meeting laws to provide greater flexibility in teleconferencing and to enhance accessibility requirements, including translation services in certain circumstances and real-time captioning. All City Council meetings are subject to SB707, and the City began offering a hybrid option with the July 21, 2026, City Council Meeting. Beyond the City Council requirement, SB 707 requires the City Council to formally authorize teleconferencing for advisory bodies, including commissions, committees, and boards, through a resolution or policy, pursuant to California Government Code section 54953.8.6, if the City Council chooses to offer the hybrid option.

As discussed in greater detail below, offering the hybrid option for all meetings will result in additional costs.

Discussion/Analysis:

To comply with Senate Bill No. 707, the City Council approved a resolution to adopt a policy governing remote participation for City Council at the June 16, 2026, City Council Meeting. A request was introduced to consider hybrid meetings for City commissions and committees. The City currently has eight commissions and three committees:
• Cornishon Corridor Joint Working Group
• Design Commission
• Emergency Preparedness Coordinating Committee
• Investment & Financing Advisory Committee
• Joint Operations Team

• Parks & Recreation Commission
• Planning Commission
• Public Safety Commission
• Public Works & Traffic Commission
• Sustainability & Resilience Commission
• Youth Council
Currently, commission and committee meetings are conducted in person at City Hall and are audio recorded. Implementation of hybrid meetings for all commissions and committees would provide the public with an additional option to observe and participate remotely, potentially increasing accessibility and public engagement. However, expanding hybrid meetings beyond City Council and Planning Commission meetings will require funding for additional staffing, audiovisual/technology support, and administrative resources.

Hybrid meetings require staff to:
• Monitor Zoom participants throughout the meeting
• Manage virtual public comments and speaker queues
• Coordinate between in-person and remote speakers
• Monitor audio and video quality
• Address technical issues before and during meetings
• Pause or suspend meetings as required under SB 707 in the event of unresolved technology disruptions
These duties would be in addition to existing responsibilities such as agenda preparation, minute taking, livestream management in CivicPlus, and post-meeting administration. Commissions and committees are currently staffed by a primary liaison who is responsible for preparing agendas, agenda packets, and minutes as well as facilitating the live meetings and following up on member requests and reporting on City projects. While some commissions have more than one staff person regularly attend the meetings, there are two commissions that only have one staff person present at their live meetings. Hybrid meetings would require additional audiovisual staff to support the primary liaison and effectively manage the virtual platform while allowing primary liaison staff to facilitate the live meeting. Depending on the complexity of the meeting, staff may need assistance from Information Technology with multiple displays, screen sharing, slides, and videos. Implementation could also require additional staff time before and after meetings for setup, testing, troubleshooting, and archiving recordings.

Currently, the City pays between $250 to $800 a month for additional A/V support for the Planning Commission. Cost is charged per hour each meeting along with travel expenses. The City’s commissions and committees collectively conduct approximately 122 meetings throughout the year.

Expanding hybrid capabilities to every commission and committee meeting would significantly increase staff workload and operational demands. Should the City Council express interest in moving forward, staff would return with implementation options and their associated budget impacts, which could $80,000 per year or more, as outlined in the FY2026-27 Council Consideration Item, "Audiovisual Staff for Broadcasting Public Meetings."
Options:

1. Receive and file a presentation regarding the potential implementation of hybrid meetings for City Commissions and Committees and provide direction to staff as appropriate; or

2. Receive and file the presentation; or

3. Provide alternate direction to staff.

Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council take the following action(s): Receive and file a presentation regarding the potential implementation of hybrid meetings for City Commissions and Committees and provide direction to staff as appropriate.

Attachments:

1. SB707Policy

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: June 16, 2026
Subject: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt a Policy Entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings” to implement Senate Bill No. 707 Presenter: Adrian Guerra, City Attorney
Proposed Action: Adopt the Attached Resolution to Adopt a Policy Entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings” to implement Senate Bill No. 707
Environmental Impact: None
Fiscal Impact: None
Background:

On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill No. 707 (“SB 707”), which revises and updates the Ralph M. Brown Act’s open meeting laws to provide greater flexibility in teleconferencing and enhance accessibility requirements, including translation services in certain circumstances and real-time captioning. SB 707 requires the City Council to formally authorize teleconferencing for advisory bodies, including commissions, committees, and boards, through a resolution or policy, pursuant to California Government Code section 54953.8.6.

These new requirements build on the existing teleconferencing framework established under prior legislation, including Assembly Bills 361 and 2449. SB 707 takes effect on July 1, 2026, and will remain in effect until January 1, 2030. A draft policy, entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings,” is now presented to the City Council to implement Senate Bill No. 707.

It is important to note that SB 707 has new provisions applicable to all city councils and new provisions only applicable to an “eligible legislative body”, which is defined as “a city council of a city located in a county with a population of 600,000 or more”. Accordingly, the City will be subject to all provisions of SB 707, i.e., both the general provisions of SB 707 and the provisions applicable to an “eligible legislative body” because the City is located in a county that exceeds a population of 600,000 people.

Discussion/Analysis:

SB 707 updates the City’s open meeting requirements to enhance public participation, transparency, and accessibility.

A. Teleconferencing and Remote Participation Requirements:

• Mandatory Hybrid Meetings: By July 1, 2026, the City Council must provide for hybrid meetings (in-person plus a teleconference option). The teleconference option must be either a two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform (e.g., zoom). If using audiovisual platforms, a call-in option and active captioning (if available) are required. • Policy Regarding Broadcast Disruption: Prior to July 1, 2026, the City Council must adopt an open-session policy regarding hybrid meetings that includes procedures for restoring service in the event of a broadcast disruption. The policy should include: (i) steps to be taken if audio, video, or the entire platform fails; (ii) the appropriate personnel to take corrective action to restore service; and (iii) the procedure to notify the public and resume the meeting upon restoration of service. In addition, the policy should also outline how the City Council will deal with a disruption or disturbance from a member of the public, either in-person or on teleconference, and restore decorum to the meeting. The policy should also address the procedures for accommodating disability requests by a Councilmember or a member of the public in participating in the meeting, as well as define “just cause” and “emergency circumstances” for purposes of remote participation by a Councilmember. • One-Hour Recess Requirement: Starting July 1, 2026, if a disruption prevents the public from attending the meeting remotely, the City Council must take a recess and try to restore service. If service cannot be restored within one (1) hour, the City Council must conduct a roll call vote confirming that good faith efforts were made, and make a finding that public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs remote access.
• Legal Basis for Remote Participation of Councilmember: Starting January 1, 2026, Councilmembers and commissioners who participate remotely must have their legal basis for remote participation recorded in the meeting minutes.
• Councilmember with Disability: Starting January 1, 2026, Councilmembers and commissioners with a disability may participate remotely as a reasonable accommodation, including participation via audio only (but only if their condition prevents participation on camera). Once an accommodation is granted for a disability, the Councilmember’s remote participation counts toward quorum at the in-person meeting site. Unlike the “just cause” or “emergency circumstance” reasons for Councilmembers/commissioners to participate remotely, there are no restrictions on the number of meetings a Councilmember/commissioner may attend remotely and no geographic limits on participation, once a disability is established and accommodated. However, those attending remotely must still disclose any present adults and their relationship to them. • “Just cause” definition expanded and extended: Currently, Councilmembers and commissioners may participate remotely due to “just cause”. In addition to the existing reasons of childcare needs, a contagious illness, official City-related travel, and physical or family medical emergency, as of January 1, 2026 the definition of “just cause” will now include military service obligations. Previously sunsetting at the end of 2025, the allowance for remote participation via “just cause” has been extended to December 31, 2029.

B. Enhancing Public Engagement (Starting July 1, 2026):
• Translation of meeting agendas: If 20 percent of the City’s population speaks an applicable foreign language and at the same time, that population speaks English less than “very well”, then the City must translate meeting agendas (but not the entire agenda packet) into that applicable language. There is no need to verbally state how the foreign language translation of the agenda may be accessed during the applicable Council meeting. [Note that the 20% calculation must be based on data regarding foreign languages from the most recent American Community Survey.]
• Translation of the City website: Similar to meeting agendas, the following information on the City’s website must also be translated if 20 percent of the City’s population speaks an

applicable foreign language and at the same time that population speaks English less than “very well”. Each translation must be accessible through a prominent direct link posted on the City’s website home page.
(A) An accessible internet webpage dedicated to public meetings that includes, or provides a link to, all of the following information:
(I) A general explanation of the public meeting process for the City Council. (II) An explanation of the procedures for a member of the public to provide in-person or remote oral public comment during a public meeting or to submit written public comment. (III) A calendar of all public meeting dates with calendar listings that include the date, time, and location of each public meeting.
(IV) The agenda is posted online.
• Social Media Use: Existing law temporarily allows a Councilmember to participate in individual communications on an internet-based social media platform for specified purposes, provided that a majority of Councilmembers do not use the platforms to discuss or deliberate on matters within the City’s specific subject matter jurisdiction. This bill makes removes the sunset date and makes this exception permanent. • Brown Act Copy: The City must provide a copy of the Brown Act to each Councilmember of the City.
• Oral Reporting of Compensation Decisions: SB 707 clarifies that the City is required to orally report, prior to final action, a summary of any recommendation of final action on compensation for the City Manager, any department heads, or other comparable administrative officer during an open meeting at which the final action is to be taken. • Assistance in translation services: The City is required to reasonably assist members of the public who wish to translate a public meeting into any language or wish to receive interpretation provided by another member of the public. The bill does not require the City to provide translation services, but only to reasonably assist others who choose to engage in translation/interpretation services. It is important to note that in providing any translation service, SB 707 limits the City’s liability in negligent translation and provides that the City will not be responsible for the contents or accuracy of any translation. o The bill states that the City Council shall publicize instructions on how to request assistance to the public.
o The “assistance” listed in the bill may include any of the following, as determined by the City Council: (i) Arranging space for one or more interpreters at the meeting location, (ii) Allowing extra time during the meeting for interpretation to occur, and/or (iii) Ensuring participants may utilize their personal equipment or reasonably access facilities for participants to access commercially available interpretation services.

Automated translation tools, such as Google Translate, may be used to satisfy these requirements, provided the other statutory obligations are met and a disclaimer is included noting that translations are automatically generated and may not be exact. • Translation near posting sites: The City must also provide a freely accessible physical location near where the agendas are posted to allow the public to post additional translations of the agenda in that location.
• Outreach requirements: The City must make reasonable efforts to invite groups that do not traditionally participate in public meetings to attend those meetings. Examples of such groups include the following:
o Media organizations providing news coverage within the City or region, including ethnic and language-specific outlets serving non-English-speaking communities. o Civil-rights, civic-engagement, neighborhood, and community-based organizations,

particularly those active in or serving multilingual or historically marginalized communities.

C. Additional Key Requirements:
• Teleconferencing for Eligible Subsidiary Bodies: SB 707 further standardizes teleconferencing procedures for eligible subsidiary bodies, such as advisory boards and committees of the City. Before an eligible subsidiary body may use teleconferencing, the City Council must first formally authorize it by charter, ordinance, resolution, or other formal action. If teleconferencing is authorized, members participating remotely must maintain realtime, two-way communication for the duration of the meeting, unless the member has a physical or mental condition meeting ADA disability criteria that results in a need to participate off camera. Further, the bill removes the prior requirement to publicly notice each remote location. Also, SB 707 requires each legislative body to reauthorize an eligible subsidiary body’s use of teleconferencing every six months by majority vote, confirming that the practice continues to serve the public interest in accordance with Government Code section 54953.8.6.

The proposed policy sets forth the authority of the City Council to authorize advisory commissions to use teleconferencing, but a separate resolution(s) will need to be adopted by the City Council in the future if the City Council chooses to allow specific teleconferencing authorization. Costs of staffing and the technology for implementation of the hybrid format for each commission will need to be considered.

The policy, if adopted, will help to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 707. Further, the policy will support the City’s mission to ensure public meetings remain transparent, accessible, and inclusive, consistent with the City Council’s goal of proactive communication with all members of the community.

Options:

1. Adopt the Attached Resolution to Adopt a Policy Entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings; or

2. Defer action and provide direction to staff.

Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council take the following action(s): Adopt the Attached Resolution to Adopt a Policy Entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings Attachments:

1. Attachment 1

01172.0001 2098894.2
DRAFT
CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA

FLINTRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY GOVERNING

REMOTE PARTICIPATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF PUBLIC

PARTICIPATION IN CITY COUNCIL AND COMMISSION MEETINGS
FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW PROVISIONS OF THE RALPH M.

BROWN ACT AS ENACTED BY SENATE BILL NO. 707
WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”), California’s open meeting law, governs the conduct of public meetings by governmental bodies; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill No. 707 (“SB 707”) to revise the Brown Act’s open meeting laws by allowing greater flexibility in teleconferencing and accessibility requirements, including translation services in certain circumstances and real time captioning, effective July 1, 2026, and until January 1, 2030; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt a policy, entitled “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings” to implement Senate Bill No. 707.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA

FLINTRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts the “Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings” dated [DATE], attached hereto, for purposes of implementing Senate Bill 707.

SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to implement and enforce the provisions of the Policy adopted herein.

SECTION 4. The City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby directed and authorized to make such modifications as may be necessary to the agenda templates of the City Council and City’s commissions, committees, and boards, along with any other agenda related materials, in order to implement the teleconferencing and related rules of SB 707.

SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions

01172.0001 2098894.2
DRAFT
of this Resolution. The City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, which, shall in turn, have immediate effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of June, 2026. __________________________
Kim Bowman
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Tania Garcia
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Adrian R. Guerra
City Attorney

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY BOOK
No. __ Policy Governing Remote Participation and
Enhancement of Public Participation in
City Council Meetings
DATE REVISED:

BY RESOLUTION:

PAGES:
01172.0001 2106151.4
PURPOSE:

The purpose of this Policy Governing Remote Participation and Enhancement of Public Participation in City Council and Commission Meetings is to implement Senate Bill No. 707 (“SB 707”), signed into law on October 3, 2025, which revises and updates the Ralph M. Brown Act’s open meeting laws to provide greater flexibility in teleconferencing and enhance public participation, transparency, and accessibility in public meetings of the City Council and authorized commissions approved by the City Council pursuant to this Policy.

POLICY:

For purposes of implementation of SB 707, the City Council hereby adopts the following requirements.

I. Hybrid meeting format.

Meetings of the City Council and commissions approved for teleconferencing pursuant to Section VII below shall be conducted in a hybrid-format, consisting of two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform, with a call-in option and automatic captioning activated if the platform provides this feature, pursuant to Government Code section 54953.4(b)(1), as may be amended.

II. Broadcast disruption procedures.

If audio, video, or the entire teleconference platform fails in a manner that prevents the public from observing or participating remotely, the presiding officer shall recess the meeting. The City Clerk or appropriate technical personnel shall take immediate corrective action to restore service. Notice of the disruption shall be posted on the City’s website and announced at the in-person meeting location, if feasible.

If remote access cannot be restored within one (1) hour, the City Council or approved commission shall conduct a roll call vote confirming that good faith efforts were made to restore service and shall make a finding that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the need for remote access before proceeding in accordance with Government Code section 54953.8(b)(7).

If a disruption affects a Councilmember or a commissioner (for commissions approved for teleconferencing pursuant to Section VII below) participating remotely due to an authorized basis, including for just cause or as a reasonable

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY BOOK
No. __ Policy Governing Remote Participation and
Enhancement of Public Participation in
City Council Meetings
DATE REVISED:

BY RESOLUTION:

PAGES:
01172.0001 2106151.4
accommodation for a disability, the presiding officer shall determine whether quorum is maintained and shall recess the meeting if necessary to restore quorum or connectivity. All disruption procedures shall apply equitably whether the disruption affects the public, a Councilmember/ a commissioner (for commissions approved for teleconferencing pursuant to Section VII below), or a member participating remotely for disability accommodation. These procedures also apply to disruptions impacting individuals participating remotely as a reasonable accommodation under applicable law.

III. Disruptions by members of the public.

In addition to authority exercised pursuant to Government Code sections 54954.3 and 54957.9, the presiding officer or their designee may remove, or cause the removal of, an individual who is disrupting a meeting, including a teleconferenced meeting, consistent with Government Code section 54957.95.

For purposes of this Policy, “disrupting” means engaging in behavior during a meeting that actually disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or renders infeasible the orderly conduct of the meeting, including failure to comply with reasonable and lawful regulations governing public comment.

Prior to removing an individual for disruptive behavior, the presiding officer or their designee shall warn the individual that their behavior is disrupting the meeting and that failure to cease the behavior may result in removal. If the individual does not promptly cease the disruptive behavior, the presiding officer or their designee may remove the individual.

A warning is not required if the behavior constitutes use of force or a true threat of force, meaning a threat that a reasonable observer would perceive as an actual threat to use force.

IV. Remote participation by Councilmembers and Commissioners. 1 (1) Just cause. A councilmember or commissioner may participate remotely for “just cause” as defined by Government Code section 54953.8.3(c), including childcare or caregiving needs, a contagious illness, official Cityrelated travel, a physical or family medical emergency, or military service 1 This section applies to the City Council and all commissions whether or not advisory commissions are approved for teleconferencing pursuant to Section VII below.

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY BOOK
No. __ Policy Governing Remote Participation and
Enhancement of Public Participation in
City Council Meetings
DATE REVISED:

BY RESOLUTION:

PAGES:
01172.0001 2106151.4
obligations. The legal basis for remote participation shall be disclosed and recorded in the meeting minutes as required by law.
(2) Emergency circumstances. Remote participation due to emergency circumstances shall comply with applicable statutory requirements, including required findings and disclosures.
(3) Disability accommodation. A Councilmember or a commissioner with a qualifying disability may participate remotely as a reasonable accommodation consistent with state and federal law. Participation may occur via audio only if the disability prevents on-camera participation. Once granted, such remote participation shall count toward quorum at the inperson meeting location. Required disclosures regarding adults present at the remote location shall be made as required by law.

V. Translation and public access.
(1) If twenty percent (20%) or more of the City’s population speaks a single non-English language and speaks English less than “very well,” based on the most recent American Community Survey data, City Council meeting agendas (but not full agenda packets) shall be translated into that language and made accessible on the City’s website pursuant to Government Code section 54953.4(b).
(2) When the applicable population threshold is met, the City shall provide translated versions of required public meeting information on a prominently linked webpage accessible from the City’s homepage, pursuant to Government Code section 54953.4(b), including:
(i) A general explanation of the public meeting process; (ii) Instructions for providing in-person or remote public comment; (iii) A calendar of public meeting dates with date, time, and location; and
(iv) Posted meeting agendas.
(3) The City shall reasonably assist members of the public who wish to provide interpretation or translate public meetings. Assistance may include arranging space for interpreters, allowing additional time for interpretation, or permitting the use of personal equipment or commercially available interpretation services. The City is not responsible for the content or

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY BOOK
No. __ Policy Governing Remote Participation and
Enhancement of Public Participation in
City Council Meetings
DATE REVISED:

BY RESOLUTION:

PAGES:
01172.0001 2106151.4
accuracy of any interpretation or translation it facilitates, assists with, or provides. The City shall publicize clear instructions for requesting such assistance in advance of or during meetings.
(4) The City shall also provide a freely accessible physical location near where the agendas are posted to allow the public to post additional translations of the agenda in that location pursuant to Government Code section 54953.4(c)(3).
(4) The City may use digital translation services, such as Google Translate or similar automated tools, to satisfy the translation requirements for agendas and the public meetings webpage, provided the other requirements of Government Code section 54953.4 are met. The City is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any translation provided by such tools, in accordance with Government Code section 54953.4(b)(2). The City may include a disclaimer noting that translations are automatically generated and may not be exact. The City shall make reasonable efforts to ensure translations are understandable to the public and may provide additional clarification upon request.

VI. Outreach efforts.

The City shall make reasonable, good-faith efforts to invite organizations that do not traditionally participate in public meetings to attend City Council meetings. The City retains discretion in determining what constitutes reasonable effort consistent with applicable law. Outreach efforts may include media organizations serving non-English-speaking communities and community groups that historically have lower participation in public meetings.

VII. Teleconferencing authorization for eligible subsidiary bodies.

Pursuant to Government Code section 54953.8.6, eligible subsidiary bodies of the City may be authorized by the City Council to use teleconferencing consistent with applicable law. This policy shall only apply to advisory commissions if authorized for use by the City Council.

Members of the authorized subsidiary body participating remotely shall maintain real-time, two-way communication for the duration of the meeting.2 The City 2 Members with a qualifying disability may participate via audio communication only, as appropriate.

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE

CITY COUNCIL POLICY BOOK
No. __ Policy Governing Remote Participation and
Enhancement of Public Participation in
City Council Meetings
DATE REVISED:

BY RESOLUTION:

PAGES:
01172.0001 2106151.4
Council shall adopt resolutions authorizing such teleconferencing and, if so adopted, may reauthorize teleconferencing for eligible subsidiary bodies every six (6) months by majority vote confirming that such practice serves the public interest.

VIII. Social media use.

Councilmembers may participate in individual communications on internet-based social media platforms for specified purposes, provided that a majority of Councilmembers do not use the platform to discuss or deliberate on matters within the City’s subject matter jurisdiction.

IX. Brown Act copies.

The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Brown Act to each Councilmember as required by Government Code section 54952.7.

X. Oral reporting of compensation decisions.

Prior to final action on compensation for the City Manager, any department head, or other comparable administrative officer, the City Council shall orally report, during the open meeting at which the final action is to be taken, a summary of any recommendation for final action, consistent with SB 707.