Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

La Mesa City Council
August 9, 2022

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
August 9, 2022
Body
La Mesa City Council
Pages
290
Original file
59.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-lamesa.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

From: Planning
To: "Sarah B."
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: opposition to No. 2017-31(CUP17-88)
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:30:00 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: Sarah B. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 4:55 PM
To: Planning
Subject: RE: opposition to No. 2017-31(CUP17-88)
To the City of La Mesa,
I am writing to state my opposition to approving project No.: 2017-31 (CUP17-88) and am against the building of a dispensary with access and entry through the residential area on Hillside Dr. La Mesa CA.

I object to the project.

This is a neighborhood, and on Hillside Dr. it is an area where kids like to play and ride their bikes. If the proposed establishment is built, it would drastically change the dynamic of the neighborhood in a negative way.

The increase in traffic may spill out onto Guava Ave and El Cajon Blvd, an intersection already causes traffic for those attempting to turn onto Hillside Dr. Within the neighborhood, the increase in traffic would decrease
There are some major concerns regarding safety and privacy of the residents.

This is an area where the neighborhood kids like to ride bikes and play. With the proposed business, the neighborhood kids will no longer have this safe area to play in.

The proposed plan cannot guarantee that its customers will not use the neighborhood as an area to smoke in- reminder- this is an area where kids live.

Can the proposed business ensure that the odor of the product be detected outside the doors?

Page 250 of 291 ends

Despite all attempts to conceal the odor, they cannot guarantee there will be no odor detection.

Concern over increased criminal activity in the area, even with the inclusion of security. Hillside Dr. is near enough to another dispensary, Cookies. Over the past year, there have been many altercations between security and customers/patrons and/or peoples. These altercations happen enough based on the environment to suppose that it would continue in this new location. What is problematic are the peoples leaving or being kicked out by the security, they may be leaving with anger and/or outrage, they would be kicked out of the dispensary and right onto Hillside Dr. and the neighborhood.

As the hours of operation will be until 9 pm at night, the comings and goings of patrons, especially those trying to get in before closing time will, be a nuisance. Living almost directly across the street from the proposed business will drastically affect quality of life.

I feel my privacy and safety will be diminished as this is going up right across from my house, the same for the other neighbors on the street.

I do not want to be neighbors with a dispensary, and I do not want to cater my life and the lives of my children to it.

La Mesa needs to consider the people who have been living here and raising their children here over that of a business that can easily set up in one of the many empty buildings in the area that are not within a neighborhood.

What kind of message does this send to the people of La Mesa? That its city approves of dispensaries to be placed where children are raised? I expect better of the town that I love.

I am uncomfortable living with the proposed business on the same street. It will decrease quality of life, decrease property values, and I should not have to cater to it.

I will not have a dispensary for a neighbor.

I hope the Zoning Department amends zoning for mixed use parcels on Hillside Dr. East of Clearview St. to allow no commercial access, and limits access to El Cajon Blvd.

Thank you,
Sarah Bosen

Page 251 of 291 ends
Page 252 of 291 ends
Page 253 of 291 ends
Page 254 of 291 ends

From: Nickolas Del Pego
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: Re: 7901 Hillside Dr Proposed Marijuana Dispensary Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:05:54 AM
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your response. This is a neighborhood we have been in since 1978, where I used to ride my bicycle on the residential streets of Clearview and the upper eastern side of Hillside Drive as I grew up. While the parcels that straddle El Cajon Blvd and Hillside Drive, east of Clearview Way, have been mixed use, they have never impacted the residential homes with commercial traffic. General access to their commercial operations has been through the El Cajon Blvd. side. I'm aware of the zoning and the implications, work professionally in government land use, and from a practical side this would be the first parcel on that East end of hillside to bring in commercial traffic by routing it through the side of the parcel directly adjacent to the residential neighborhood. I do not believe the intent of these mixed use parcels was to do so and they never have before. If approved, this proposal would change the nature of the residential portion of a neighborhood that has been relatively quiet for the past 70 plus years since our neighbor Mr. Hall first built his home on the top of the dirt street.

Best,
Nick Del Pego
Yvonne's Son and co-owner of her home, literally five doors down from the proposed dispensary's parking lot
858-248-9492
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 9:08 AM Michael Fellows <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Yvonne,
The existing residence at 7901 Hillside Drive would be removed. A new commercial building would be constructed at the ground level of and front upon El Cajon Boulevard.

The parking lot for this building would be accessed from Hillside drive and be partially located on the roof of the building . Customer access to the dispensary would be provided via an elevator from the Hillside Drive parking lot.

While staff understands your concern about impacts on the neighborhood, Measure U (approved by voters) specified requirements for dispensaries. Staff has reviewed the application and found it complies with Measure U and development standards for the zone, including the required number of parking spaces for the building.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions, Mike Michael Fellows, AICP
Contract Planner
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1103 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us -----Original Message-----

Page 255 of 291 ends

From: Hotmail [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 7:11 PM
To: Michael Fellows
Cc: Nick Del Pego
Subject: 7901 Hillside Dr Proposed Marijuana Dispensary To: Michael Fellows, AICP, Contract Planner
Please clarify if the “proposed storefront marijuana dispensary in a proposed commercial building” is for a new commercial building to be built on the lower ElCajon Blvd side of the Hillside property or if the proposal is to have the current residential house on that property changed to be considered a commercial building.

My property at 4930 Clearview Way is in very close proximity to the Hillside property.

How customers would access the proposed dispensary would make a significant difference.

Access from the residential side would hugely impact the significantly limited residential parking. Any additional traffic on the very narrow Hillside, Clearview and Culowee streets would cause additional issues.

Your clarification of what is being proposed is greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
Yvonne Ellen

Page 256 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: FW: Proposed 7901 Hillside Drive Storefront Marijuana Dispensary Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:51:08 AM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
Hi Mike,
This came from the Planning email.

Thank you
Tejennia Hargrove
Development Services Technician II
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1348 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us From: Yvonne Ellen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 12:52 AM
To: Planning
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed 7901 Hillside Drive Storefront Marijuana Dispensary The issue is this proposal, if passed, will transform a quiet residential neighborhood into a high impact customer based commercial business area and have a far ranging impact. Those initiating this proposal are attempting to avoid current laws prohibiting marijuana dispensaries to be located within 1,000 feet of each other. If measured in a straight line along El Cajon Boulevard, Cookies marijuana dispensary, located at 7935 El Cajon Boulevard, is only 235 feet from the El Cajon Boulevard side of the 7901 Hillside Drive property. But if you go to the end of the El Cajon Boulevard block, turn the few feet onto Guava, and immediately turn onto Hillside to the 7901 address, that driving distance is 2,018 feet. It is a nice trick! But that is why the dispensary entrance must be on Hillside instead of El Cajon Boulevard. That is why there would only be an emergency exit on the El Cajon Boulevard side in the proposed new commercial building. In addition, most marijuana dispensaries, like Cookies, operate from 7 AM to 9 PM seven days a week! If this proposal is allowed to pass, the immediate and long-term result will be 14 hours a day of high-volume street and pedestrian traffic, and street parking issues for the residents of the surrounding neighborhoods that already have extremely limited street parking available. To allow any customer based storefront commercial business to operate out of any existing residential neighborhood destroys the peace and quiet of that neighborhood and the surrounding neighborhoods.

There are numerous residential properties zoned for mixed use throughout La Mesa that abut major thoroughfares. It is unlikely that the intent was ever for those properties to allow the intrusion of high volume, customer based commercial businesses to operate in quiet, established, residential neighborhoods where residents are raising their children and hoping for a little peace and quiet. I

Page 257 of 291 ends

bought my home on Clearview Way in 1978. It is where I have raised my family and enjoyed decades of friendships and the mutual support neighbors give to each other. These neighborhoods should be valued, not destroyed.

Hillside Drive is a short, non-through street. To eliminate the prospect of high volume commercial traffic in our neighborhood, is it feasible for the Zoning Department to amend zoning for the few mixed use parcels on Hillside to limit any commercial access to El Cajon Boulevard and to allow no new commercial access for mixed use properties on Hillside east of the Clearview Way intersection, and anywhere on Clearview Way or Culowee Street?
Respectfully,
Yvonne Ellen
Property Owner of
4930 Clearview Way
Sent from Mail for Windows

Page 258 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: "Rita Gonzalez"
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: Clearview Way
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:27:21 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: Rita Gonzalez [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 1:15 PM
To: Planning
Subject: Clearview Way
To whom it may concern:

The proposal of placing a dispensery in or close to a quiet neighborhood is unwise and a lack of concern for all residents of La Mesa.

Vehicles already pass through the street at a high rate of speed. There is a special needs home and kids that live on Clearview as well as my grandchildren of which are 2 and 5.

This also imposes on the police department as it will increase the ratio per officer. It increases the risk of more violence and hostility as the riots that have already taken place in our city.

Please listen to the residents of La Mesa and not about the financial aspects.

Thank you for allowing me to voice my concerns.

Page 259 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: "Dwayne I"
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: 7901 Hillside Drive Dispensary = NO!
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:27:48 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: Dwayne I [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 1:40 PM
To: Planning
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 7901 Hillside Drive Dispensary = NO!
Hello,
We recently became aware of the city of La Mesa considering a marijuana dispensary on Hillside Dr. with the storefront access pointing into the neighborhood at this location.

If you're not aware, the Hitching Post Motel is on that street and currently the residents there fight for street parking on Hillside Drive already as there is LIMITED TO NO PARKING anywhere in our neighborhood and the Hitching Post has few parking spaces which force the occupants to park mostly on Hillside and occasionally spilling onto Clearview Way.

As we bought a home on Clearview Way 8 years ago and we have maintained residence here this entire time, I can personally attest that the occupants that live on Clearview Way have regularly competed for parking the ENTIRE time we have lived here. Simply, there is NO PARKING available for anyone else except those that live in this neighborhood which includes Hillside Drive, Clearview Way and Culowee St.

In fact, it appears those evaluating this proposal are completely unaware even of the limited width of Hillside Drive, Clearview Way AND Culowee St. On both Hillside Drive and Clearview Way, only ONE vehicle can pass thru at a time due to there not being enough space

Page 260 of 291 ends

for two cars to drive past each other in both directions at the same time. Cars are parked daily on each side of the street, as well.

Furthermore, though the city seems to think that it's important to pave and repave Guava, La Mesa Drive and El Cajon Blvd, I know for a fact that Hillside Drive and Clearview Way have NOT been paved by the city in at least 8 years! And now you want to send more traffic our way?! No!
Additionally, every time you close Guava and/or La Mesa Blvd, our neighborhood gets slammed with drivers speeding thru our one vehicle able to pass thru at a time street since there is no other way to get to El Cajon Blvd unless you go all the way to Baltimore, or worse, down west toward Parks Ave! You don't put cones up, you do not staff the corners or the streets in our neighborhood with construction personnel to ensure neighborhood safety. No, the drivers just speed their way thru our ordinarily peaceful neighborhood while putting our pets and children's lives in peril. That's another issue, I know, however, since apparently you are not adept to understand the dynamics of this neighborhood someone has to inform you of these issues.

And, adding a ridiculous business that will surely be super busy, constantly, will only compound these issues and completely ruin this neighborhood. Cookies, the marijuana dispensary that recently was allowed to be placed just below this proposed location on El Cajon Blvd already has added additional parking problems in our neighborhood when that business has a sale or special. El Cajon Blvd curbside parking gets filled and everyone then parks in our neighborhood thus clogging the streets and eliminating parking for our residents.

Furthermore, a business with entry into our neighborhood, as is being proposed, will surely REDUCE THE VALUE of our home. So, if you go thru with allowing this business to occupy said space with said entry into our neighborhood, I will tell you to expect lawsuits for the devaluation of our property due to this action. Our home is currently valued at OVER 800k and constantly increasing in value. Allowing this business, or ANY business to enter our neighborhood with neighborhood facing entry only via our streets of Hillside Drive, Clearview Way and/or Culowee will always be unacceptable!
Thank you.

Dwayne Ivey
Sara Backus
And the Backus Estate

Page 261 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: FW: Public Comments - Pot Shop Density; PROJECT NO. 2017-31 (HILLSIDE) - CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED

COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A CANNABIS USE
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:13:30 PM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
Hi Mike,
This came from the Planning email.

Thank you
Tejennia Hargrove
Development Services Technician II
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1348 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us From: Dianne Osterling [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 3:44 PM
To: Dianne Osterling; Planning
Cc: Mark Arapostathis; Bill Baber; Jack Shu; Colin Parent Subject: RE: Public Comments - Pot Shop Density; PROJECT NO. 2017-31 (HILLSIDE) -

CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A CANNABIS USE I just saw that on 9/1/2021 another dispensary was put forth before the Planning Commission for approval at 7584 University Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91941. So make that 17 dispensaries, not including the one proposed at Hillside. Is walkability to a dispensary really a priority? Just saying. Maybe you could encourage having some right at the trolley stations in the middle of La Mesa.

From: Dianne Osterling <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 3:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jack Shu <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Public Comments - Pot Shop Density; PROJECT NO. 2017-31 (HILLSIDE) - CONSIDERATION

OF PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A CANNABIS USE
Dear Planning Commissioners & Councilmembers,
La Mesa’s website says email comments by 5 pm on the day of a committee meeting. Unfortunately, I just noticed today’s meeting was 8:48 a.m., and no link to the proposal was included with the agenda.

Page 262 of 291 ends

On 8/9/2021 Design Review Board Recommended PROJECT NO. 2017-31 (HILLSIDE) –

CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A CANNABIS USE How many La Mesa dispensaries are enough? 16 exist. I’m not opposed to legal marijuana, but request Council consider pot shop density community impact. THE 7901 HILLSIDE location IS A 4- MINUTE WALK FROM A POT SHOP & IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD- apartments West: 4979 Clearview Way & 4951 Clearview Way. Single Family: East @ 7930 Hillside Drive & Northwest @ 7893 El Cajon Blvd. Walks: 1-minute to The Hitching Post, 6-minutes to St. Martin of Tours. It’s surrounded by housing, except the backyard. A Pot Shop facing residents, minutes from a Pot Shop doesn’t enhance this neighborhood. After listening to the budget discussion at the council meeting last night, I realize the tax from pot sales are bringing in money to the city. However, I ask you to consider the cost to the community. Allowing dispensaries to infringe on residential neighborhoods, just to bring in sales tax is not necessarily good long term community development.

La Mesa Dispensary Density a MAP: https://weedmaps.com/dispensaries/in/unitedstates/california/east-san-diego

1. Lit La Mesa
Dispensary
7729
University
Ave, La Mesa,
CA 91942
https://litlamesa.treez.io/onlinemenu/?customerType=ADULT

2. Wellgreens 8160
Parkway Dr,
La Mesa, CA
91942
https://wellgreens.store/locations

3. Wellgreens 5301 Lake
Murray Blvd,
La Mesa, CA
91942
https://wellgreens.store/locations

4. The Grove 8155 Center
St, La Mesa,
CA 91942
https://thegroveca.com/

5. Urbn Leaf La
Mesa
Dispensary
7339 El Cajon
Blvd, La
Mesa, CA
91942
https://urbnleaf.com/dispensaries/ca/la-mesa/

6. Cookies 7935 El Cajon
Blvd, La
Mesa, CA
91942
https://www.cookiessandiego.com/location

7. Emjay - La
Mesa
7180
University
Ave, La Mesa,
CA 91942
https://heyemjay.com/cannabis-delivery-san-diego/?
utm_source=google&utm_medium=gmb&utm_campaign=sd

8. The Reserve 8744 La
Mesa Blvd, La
https://www.reservesd.com/home

Page 263 of 291 ends

Mesa, CA
91942

9. EMBR
Dispensary
8300 Center
Dr, La Mesa,
CA 91942
https://embr.us/

10. Exotic Meds $Mount
Helix, La
Mesa, CA
91941
https://www.yelp.com/biz/exotic-meds-la-mesa

11. Hotbox -
San Diego
8260
Parkway Dr
La Mesa, CA
91942
https://www.yelp.com/biz/hotbox-san-diego-la-mesa

12. Holistic
Daze Delivery
8130 La
Mesa Blvd, La
Mesa, CA
91942
https://www.yelp.com/biz/holistic-daze-delivery-la-mesa

13. Merry Jane
Collective
Mount Helix
– La Mesa,
91941
https://www.yelp.com/biz/merry-jane-collective-la-mesa-2

14. CMC 7364 El Cajon
Blvd Ste 203,
La Mesa, CA
91941
https://www.yelp.com/biz/cmc-la-mesa

15. Dr.

Greenthumb’s
8760 Campo
Rd La Mesa,
CA 91941
https://www.sandiegodgt.com/

16. East County
Cooperative
7200
Parkway Dr
Ste 101,102
La Mesa, CA
91942
https://www.yelp.com/biz/east-county-cooperative-la-mesa

17. La Mesa
Medicinal
Marijuana
8851 Ctr Dr
Fl 7th Ste
701, La
Mesa, CA
91942
(Apparently this is a place to get a medical MJ license) Yelp’s “Top 10” La Mesa Pot Dispensaries: https://www.yelp.com/search? cflt=cannabisdispensaries&find_loc=la+mesa%2C+CA

Page 264 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: "cyrussrust"
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: Proposed Hillside Drive Marijuana Dispensary Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:33:52 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: cyrussrust [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Planning
Subject: Proposed Hillside Drive Marijuana Dispensary
Hello,
I am a resident on Culowee Street in the City of La Mesa. I am writing to voice my objection to the proposed marijuana dispensary at 7901 Hillside Drive.

The nearby Cookies Dispensary at 7935 El Cajon Blvd has created a very noticible increase in both vehicle and pedestrian traffic for that area. I frequently see pedestrians jaywalking across El Cajon Blvd to get to this dispensary because of the insufficient business parking this dispensary provides or illegally parking in the nearby apartment complex. This occurs even with the already available street parking along El Cajon Blvd. This is a concern that would be exasturbated by another dispensary being placed in the immediate area.

The permit request is not clear if access to the proposed 7901 Hillside Drive storefront marijuana dispensary would be from Hillside Drive or El Cajon Blvd. If it is Hillside Drive this is an absurd request that clearly has no regard for the impact a marijuana dispencery would have being placed in a residential neighborhood, let alone the negative effect these types of businesses have in general when in/near

Page 265 of 291 ends

residential neighborhoods. Armed private security with bullet proof vests are outside the front of every dispensary in La Mesa. Bringing these types of businesses into residential areas should be avoided for this reason alone. If this permit is requesting a storefront on El Cajon Blvd I believe the lack of parking in the area for additional businesses of this type needs to be addressed first.

Thank you for your time,
Cyruss
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S20 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone

Page 266 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: FW: No To Marijauna Dispensary on 7901 Hillside Dr.

Date: Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:15:50 PM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
Hi Mike,
This came from the Planning email.

Thank you
Tejennia Hargrove
Development Services Technician II
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1348 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us From: Matthew Stevens [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 12:43 PM
To: Planning
Subject: No To Marijauna Dispensary on 7901 Hillside Dr.

Hello,
Please do not approve the location of the proposed dispensary at 7901 Hillside Dr. I live a couple of blocks away from that site and I know how it is already very competitive for residents to find their own parking spots. Plus added commercial traffic will make the surrounding neighborhood even more unsafe for pedestrians and children at play. Please put the quality of life for La Mesa's residents ahead of the potential tax revenues from yet another dispensary.

Thank You for your consideration.
--
Cheers,
Matthew D. Stevens
(619) 961-7091
8038 Culowee St, La Mesa, CA 91942.

Page 267 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: FW: Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88) (Hillside) Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:02:14 AM
Hi Mike,
This came from the Planning email.

Thank you
Tejennia Hargrove
Development Services Technician II
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1348 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us -----Original Message-----
From: Bill Stilwell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2021 10:29 PM
To: Planning
Subject: Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88) (Hillside)
La Mesa Planning Commission,
Regarding the proposed Dispensary at 7901 Hillside Dr.

My wife and I have owned the property and lived at 4938 Clearview Way since January 1996. In that time the neighborhood has gone from about 50% rental property to about 80% rental. With that has come an increase in traffic and street parking. Clearview Way and Hillside drive are narrow streets. Cars traveling in opposite directions can not pass without one of them pulling over out of the way. This is extremely evident when Guava is closed and traffic detoured through Clearview and Hillside.

Our objection is to the vehicle access and parking lot on Hillside Drive.

Any business proposed for the mixed use lots on Hillside need to have vehicle access from El Cajon Blvd.

Clearview Way and Hillside Drive can not handle any commercial traffic safely. These are narrow residential streets. Many times I have encountered kids playing in the street on Hillside when driving to my house. Add that to the narrow streets where cars can not pass in opposite directions at the same time and you can see why parking and vehicle access for a retail business on Hillside Drive is a bad idea.

Thank You,
Bill Stilwell
Sent from my iPad

Page 268 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: Michael Fellows
Subject: FW: Proposed dispensary - 7901 Hillside drive -project # 2017-31(CUP 17-88) - neighbor concerns - Ken Vollmer Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:59:10 AM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
Hi Mike,
This came from the Planning email.

Thank you
Tejennia Hargrove
Development Services Technician II
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: 619.667.1348 | Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.us From: Ken Vollmer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:52 AM
To: Planning
Cc: Ken Vollmer
Subject: Proposed dispensary - 7901 Hillside drive -project # 2017-31(CUP 17-88) - neighbor concerns - Ken Vollmer
Dear Planning Commission:

As a resident of the neighborhood where this business is proposed to be located, I have major concerns with this proposal. My address is 4935 Clearview Way.

Most importantly, I'm very concerned about the increase in traffic that this would bring. There are several small children very nearby that play near the street and, even though their parents are watching closely, they sometimes wander into the street. As a resident in this neighborhood, I know to drive slowly on Hillside Drive and Clearview Way. However, I'm sure you'd agree that a non-resident that is driving down these streets to get to a business may not be so careful. I believe the risk of a terrible accident would be too high and the dispensary should not be allowed to open here.

I'm also concerned about the likely overcrowding of parked cars on the nearby streets. As it is, our streets are very narrow and sometimes 2 cars going in opposite directions cannot even pass each other when cars are parked on both sides of the street. Also, several of the people that work in the assisted living home in our neighborhood currently park on my street. This is not an issue right now but these essential workers will likely have much more difficulty finding available parking if this business were to open.

Please consider my comments as you decide whether or not to approve this proposal.

Thank you,

Page 269 of 291 ends

Ken Vollmer
[email protected]

Page 270 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: "Robert Brinkmeier"
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: Hilldale Marijuana Dispensary
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:34:31 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: Robert Brinkmeier [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 3:40 PM
To: Planning
Subject: Hilldale Marijuana Dispensary
To the La Mesa Planning Commision,
My wife and I (20+ year home owners on Culowee Street) are STRONGLY OPPOSED to having a Marijuana Dispensary on Hillsdale Drive for the following reasons;

1. This is a residential neighborhood with limited main street access, narrow streets and extremely limited parking. The addition of a dispensary would make our parking and any guests we have over nearly impossible as well as for my live at home college student son and his girlfriend when she visits.

2. There is already another dispensary on El Cajon Blvd not more than 500 feet or so down the hill. I thought the minimum requirement was the dispensaries were to be located at least 1,000 feet apart.

3. This is a residential neighborhood with several families with small children. The increased traffic will put those young lives at risk due to the expected increase in traffic traveling to the dispensary. People already use Culowee Street as a "shortcut" due to all the construction in the area. I can only imagine the impact a dispensary will have on Culowee Street traffic.

Plainly and simply this neighborhood is not set up for high volume traffic businesses, it was designed for people to live in a nice QUIET neighborhood which is why we bought a house here!

Page 271 of 291 ends

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Mr. & Mrs Robert Brinkmeier

Page 272 of 291 ends

From: Planning
To: "Calvin Gipson, Gipson.Assoc."
Cc: Kerry Kusiak; Michael Fellows
Subject: RE: Project No 2017-31 (CUP 17-88)
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:28:45 PM
Good Afternoon,
Project No. 2017-31 (CUP 17-88), which is listed on tonight’s Planning Commission agenda, will be continued to a date certain of October 6th.

Thank you for your interest in the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Cheryl
Cheryl Davis ƒ Administrative Coordinator ƒ Community Development ƒ 619.667.1190 P ƒ 619.667.1380 F From: Calvin Gipson, Gipson.Assoc. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 3:07 PM
To: Planning
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Project No 2017-31 (CUP 17-88)
To the members of the La Mesa Planning Commission,
In all my years as a Professional Architect and Planner, I have never seen any project so horrendous and inappropriately proposed.

If this CUP application (CUP 17-88) proposes to allow a commercial,14 hours a day operation; to occur at 7901 Hillside Dr. with it's commercial entrance on Hillside Dr.(a residential dead end street, with limited vehicular access and parking) it appears intuitively obvious to me, that this is a terrible Idea. And for the planning commission; who's task it is is to provide for the general welfare and good city planning for it's citizenry, to approve this would be an horrific performance of that duty.

As it is, to access that portion of Hillside Dr. from Clearview Way, due to narrowness of the street, on many of occasions, one has to stop and pull over or back up to allow opposite flowing traffic to pass. So no, this is not a good idea.

And to reiterate, this is a dead end residential street, one in which some the neighborhood children use as an area to play, seeing as the opportunity for outdoor

Page 273 of 291 ends

play in this area is also very limited. This poses a considerable safety challenge. So no, this is not a good idea.

Dear Commissioners, assuming you live in a residential area (and I hate to make assumptions cause you know what that means) would any of you want an operation like this on the block where you reside? Does this make sense? Maybe to have access on El Cajon Blvd., maybe, but not Hillside Dr. Seriously? Please consider your recommendations carefully and it's impact on this neighborhood and future neighborhoods.

This is a "Conditional Use Application". The applicate is asking for conditions that don't make sense at this location and are certainly not an example good city planning.

II urge you in your infinite wisdom, do not approve this application.

Thank you, for your time and consideration
Calvin E. Gipson,
Residential and Commercial Architect
Resident of 7939 Hillside Dr. La Mesa, CA 91942 Ph (619) 540-2237

Page 274 of 291 ends

C-D-MU

VACANT LOT
13'-5"

PARKING

EXISTING RESIDENCE

EXISTING RETAINING WALL BELOW TO REMAIN
H/C
AISLE
H/C 8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPE

E L C A J O N B L V D

H I L L S I D E D R I V E
42" WALL

SIDEWALK
A
A

ROLLING GATE
7'-7" 16'-3"
13'-5"
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
C-D-MU

STDR STDR STDR STDR

COMP COMP COMP
19'-0"
16'-0" 27'-5" 9'-0" TYP. 8'-0" TYP.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN
20'-0"
COMP
4'-0"
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL
CURB
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING

GATE BELOW
C
C
20'-0"
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
3'-0"
L P
L P
L P
L P

FACE OF CURB

PLANTER

NEW STRUCTURAL WALL BELOW

RETAINING WALL VARIES BELOW

STRUCTURE BELOW

SERVICE AREA

ENTRY COVER
4'-0"
SEE C.1. FOR ADDITIONALCURB CUT INFORMATION

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

LOADING ZONE - NO PARKING

LOADING ZONE

NO PARKING SIGN
6"
4'-0" 6"

METAL ROOF

ELEVATOR
13'-5"
10'-4"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE AND

STREET TREE
LANDS

INCLUDING
GRATE

GATE BELOW
4'-0"
4'-6"
5'-0"
4'-6"
LANDS
4'-4"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE AND

STREET TREE

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE BELOW AT

SERVICE AREA

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

LANDSCAPE BELOW AT

SERVICE AREA
25'-0"

POST FOR COVERED
PARKING ROOF ( TYP).

LINE OF COVERED PARKING

LINE OF COVERED PARKING
8" 8" 6" CURB ONE STORY METAL ROOFMECHANICAL TRASH ( BINS ) SCREEN B
B
. All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a Professional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A1

SITE PLAN
N

SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN
3/16" = 1'-0"
PROJECT DATA:

VICINITY MAP
PROJECT ADDRESS: 7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE, LA MESA, CALIFORNIA APPLICANT: WILL SENN (619) 346-0587
LEGAL LOT: LOT 4 OF EVENTIDE, PER MAP 1781, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OFTHE COUNTY RECORDER, FEBRUARY 20, 1924.

APN: 470-200-27
OWNER: 7901 HILLSIDE LLCCONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-BOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: M ZONE: C-D-MULOT SITE AREA: 5,617 sq ft. 0.129 Ac.LOT DIMENSIONS: 49.25' x 114.12'FLOOR AREA (BUILDING): 2,122 sq ft.PROPOSED USE: M (Retail/Commercial Service) / B (Office) Medical Marijuana Dispensary / Retail space
LANDSCAPE AREA: 1,296 sq ft.

SHEET INDEX
A1 SITE PLAN / ROOF PLANA2 MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY NOTESA3.1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLANA4 DEMOLITION PLAN / SECURITY FLOOR PLAN / BUILDING CODE MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY:

Application for a Conditional Use Permit, (CUP) for a Medical Marijuana Dispensary.

Scope of work to include:
1) Remove existing residential unit and driveway2) New 2122 sf. Medical Marijuana Dispensary and retail space3) New 8 lot parking area at upper level4) New elevator, mechanical and trash areas5) New Landscaping Hours of Operations: 7:00AM to 9:00PM, seven days a week No proposed deviations to building code
Proposed deviations for landscape at 3' setback
A6 SECTIONS AND TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS
(PROJECT SCOPE)PARKING ANALYSIS:

BUILDING AREA: 2122 SFREQUIRED PARKING: 1 / 2502122 / 250 = 8 SPACES SPACES PROVIDED = 8 SPACES
A3.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANE1 ELECTRICAL NOTESL1 LANDSCAPE PLANC0 CIVIL EXISTING TOPOC1 CIVIL GRADINGC2 CONCEPTUAL PERMANENT BMP PLAN

FIRE HYDRANT
A7 EXTERIOR COLOR RENDERSA8 SITE PHOTOS

SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN
A5.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.2 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS COLORS This CUP is subject to all requirements specified under LMMCC 24.23. 01-09-2019
E2 SITE PARKING REFLECTIVE CEILING PLAN
Attachment C

Page 275 of 291 ends

. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A2

MMCC NOTES
I. All commercial medical marijuana facilities shall secure a State license within 6 months of the State issuance.

Revocation of a permittee's State license shall result in immediate revocation of the permittee's City of La Mesapermit.

2. The site shall be alarmed with a centrally monitored fire and burglar alarm system and monitored by an alarm company licensed by the State of California (Business & Professions Code 7590 et.seq.).

3. At all times the medical marijuana facility is open, the facility shall provide at least one security guard who is licensed, possesses a valid Department of Consumer Affairs "security guard card" and has a valid City of LaMesa Business License.

4. All commercial medical marijuana facilities shall maintain a minimum of 600 feet radius separation from schools as defined and in compliance with Health and Safety code 11362.768. (the Path of Travel separation fromsensitive uses is an independent measure).

5. Lighting at commercial medical marijuana facilities shall remain illuminated at all times between sunset and sunrise with sufficient intensity to illuminate every portion of the premises including but not limited to parking,any accessory uses and adjoining sidewalks.

6. 24-hour fixed-camera video surveillance shall be required at aU commercial marijuana facilities and digital storage in the cloud or other off-site method of recordings shall be available for 90 days after recording. Further, thatrecording shall be of a sufficient quality to provide identification of any individual being recorded; that thesurveillance covers every interior area and room and adjacent perimeter areas within a minimum of 50 feet; andthat the City of La Mesa Porke Department or other City authorized department shall have 24-hour remoteaccess to the surveillance system.

7. No consumption of any cannabis product shall be allowed on any of the facility's premises.

8. All products shall be tracked, tested, sealed and labeled at a minimum by State Medica! Cannabis Regulation Act and as it may be amended.

9. All cannabis products that .can be ingested by eating or drinking shall have a warning label or sign advising them of the potential hazard associated with over-consumption.

10. A licensee shall keep accurate records of commercial cannabis activity.

I I. All records related to commercial cannabis activity shall be maintained for a minimum of seven years.

12. The City or its designee may examine the records of licensees and inspect the premises of a licensee as the licensing authority as may be authorized by law. The City or its designee shall have access to any licensedmedical marijuana facility for inspection of the facility, the employees and records (HIPPA compliance rules apply) during any normal business hours or at any other reasonable time. Licensees shall provide and deliver records to the licensing authority upon request (Business and Professions Code 19327(c).)

13. Authorized regulatory staff shall be allowed access to the premises in accordance with State law (Business and Professions Code 19311 (e) ; 19327 (c»).

14. All commercial medical marijuana businesses shall maintain a current register of the names of all employees currently employed by the dispensary and shall disclose such registration for any City officer or authorizedofficial for purposes of determining compliance with local and state medical marijuana employmentrequirements.

15. The medical marijuana permit holder shaH have a BOE seller's permit or application for BOE seller's permit for the commercial medical marijuana activity in which they engage pursuant to Business and Professions Code19312(a) and I 9320(d»).

16. A commercial medical marijuana licensee shall have a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed 14 calendar days to cure a legitimate complaint unless the complaint would result in an immediate danger to thepublic and shall be cured immediately as determined by local law enforcement or other appropriate authority.

17. Disposal of any unused or unwanted medical marijuana shall undergo a special process and shall not be disposed of as or with routine garbage.

18. All employees shall undergo a background check and any person who has been convicted of a felony may not be employed by or operate, manage, control or own a dispensary facility or premise.

19. All employees of any medical marijuana facility shall have clearly visible photo identification badges that are to be worn at all times when they are on the premises of the facility.

20. Electricity in all commercial marijuana facilities shall be grid connected and compliant with current code. The use of generators other than for emergency security back-up is prohibited.

21. Any plumbing modifications for all commercial marijuana facilities shall be approved by the Building Department prior to modification.

22. A unique identifier shall be used to identify and track any plant over 12" in height as provided by State regulation from the cultivator until the time of sale. The identifier shall contain all and any information required by Statelaw as it may be amended. At a minimum, the identifier shall identify the origin of the plant and the dispensary ordistributor for which the plant is being grown and any other information required by State law (Business andProfessions Code I 9334(a)(3) as may be amended.

23. Any volatile substances as well as any hazardous materials stored or used on premises shall be disclosed in advance to the City and stored or fastened in a secure manner or as required by City code. Volatile solventsshall be prohibited.

24. An annual Medical Marijuana Maintenance Report and fee to operate any commercial medical marijuana facility is required. Applications for the annual Medical Marijuana Maintenance Report and fee shall be filed with City ofLa Mesa Planning Department at least 60 calendar days before the expiration of the current permit(commencing after the effective date of the Conditional Use Permit with the first issuance of a Business licenseand annually on the anniversary date for five consecutive years).

25. A commercial medical marijuana business shall not transfer ownership or control of the business to another person or entity unless and until the transferee first obtains an approval from the City of La Mesa and the City of La Mesa and the appropriate fees are paid.

26. No commercial medical marijuana facility may be phYSically changed or increased in size (e.g., floor area or buildings utilized) without prior approval and/or amending the existing permit.

27. All staff of commercial medical marijuana businesses shall receive appropriate training for their intended duties as required by state and local law.

28. Pursuant to the LMMC Section 24.02.060 a conditional use permit may be revoked by the planning commission if it determines that the permit was obtained through fraudulent representatives or the use was subsequentlychanged in operation contrary to representations or conditions applied and pursuant to LMMC Section 24.23. AConditional Use Permit may be revoked or suspended due to failure to enact a correction ordered by the Cityin response to a legitimate and city confirmed smell and/or noise complaint as well as non-compliance with theregulations of the Medical Marijuana Activity Zoning Ordinance or failure to comply with Senate Bill 643,Assembly Bill 266, and Assembly Bill 243, as amended.

29. The project shall comply with the most recent adopted California Fire and Building Codes and Standards.

30. A Fire inspection is required prior to a certificate of occupancy or issuance of business license.

31. The project shall implement and maintain CPTED principles as illustrated on Exhibit "A" or as required by the Conditional Use Permit.

32. All activities associated with the business shall be conducted indoors.

33. Any new rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the street and adjacent properties.34. A building permit application shall be submitted to the building department for review and if a change in use occupancy load is required. The construction shall be completed in compliance with an approved buildingpermit.

35. Business operations shall not commence unless all required approvals, inspections and licenses have been obtained.

36. Site landscape shall be consistent with the Water Conservation Ordinance and Landscape requirements of the underlying zone.

37. The applicant shall maintain the project in good condition and repair. Maintenance of the property and the responsibility for such maintenance shall be that of the owner of record and/or the occupant, separately orjointly, and either or both may be cited for any violation on the building site.

38. All yards and other open spaces around buildings shall be kept free of waste, litter, junk, or storage of any material; provided, where outside storage is a permitted use or is a nonconforming use, such storage shall bedone in an orderly manner. Packing boxes, lumber. litter. dirt and other debris accumulated in vestibules,doorways or the adjoining sidewalks or outside commercial buildings and visible from public or private streetsshall be prohibited.

39. All approved landscaped areas shall be properly maintained by regular watering. mowing. pruning. fertilizing, clearing of weeds and debris, the removal and replacement of dead or diseased plants and trees, and the repairand replacement of irrigation systems and integrated architectural features (e.g., fountains).

40. All driveways and parking areas shall be graded, hard surfaced, and maintained in accordance with standards established by the City Council resolution.

41. All fences and structures shall be kept in good condition. All building materials and architectural features shall be kept in good condition, both structurally and aesthetically. Awnings and other features constructed ofmaterials subject to weathering and deterioration shall be replaced when they are worn, tattered. excessivelyfaded, or otherwise in poor condition. All building and exterior finishes and architectural features shall be maintained to avoid the appearance of deterioration or disrepair from excessive weathering. paint chipping orpeeling. excessive cracks. broken windows or doors. or other conditions that represent lack of proper propertymaintenance.

42. Attractive nuisances dangerous to children, including but not limited to abandoned and broken equipment, iceboxes, refrigerators, and unprotected and/or hazardous pools, ponds and excavations are prohibited.

43. The following requirements shall be accomplished at no cost to the City in connection with development (see exceptions LMMC24.06.040B.I.a &b);
a. If the building site has frontage on a public street which is substandard with respect to either width or improvements as prescribed in the Street Standards Resolution or General Plan. then land needed for wideningof each such substandard street shall be granted to the city and needed street improvements specified in suchresolution shall be made to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Such improvement shall include but is notlimited to preparation of the street right-of-way by grading, removal of obstructions. construction of retaining walls. guardrails or other protective devices determined by the city engineer to be necessary, together with preparation of engineering plans for all improvements.
b. All public utility services shall be underground.

44. Fire access. fire hydrants. water service, and other fire protection facilities shall be provided in accordance with current La Mesa fire standards.

45. On-site and offsite drainage shall be provided for and disposed of to the satisfaction of the city engineer.

46. Payment for the Maintenance Report shall be submitted to the City no later than 60 days in advance of the required annual Maintenance Report due date. The annual Maintenance Report due date is the anniversary dateof the effective date of the Conditional Use Permit.

47. The business shall be subject to future local taxes. If a local tax is implemented, a payment schedule may be established.

48. Fees are non-refundable and shall be consistent with the Fee Schedule. The Fee Schedule is updated on an annual basis.

49. All points of ingress, egress and parking shall comply with ADA regulations. Additional requirements may apply based on the existing conditions and proposed improvements.

50. The site and business shall conform to the approved Conditional Use Permit and associated Exhibit "A" and approved building plans for any tenant improvements including any changes to electrical, plumbing or mechanicalsystems prior to conducting business.

51. No one under 18 years is allowed in dispensaries unless accompanied by a primary caregiver or a licensed attending physician or documented legal guardian.

52. At least two (2) employees shall be on the premises during business hours.53. A copy of the Medical Marijuana Dispensary Permit/License shall be displayed inside the facility in a place visible to the public.

54. Any entrance to the dispensing area and any storage areas including restrooms shall be locked at all times and under the control of the dispensary employees with current and valid employee permits.

55. No consumption of food allowed.

56. No sales or consumption of any alcohol or tobacco products allowed on premises.57. Logos visible to the public are prohibited.58. The maximum size of outdoor signage visible to the public and shall conform to LMMC Title 15 in addition to the restrictions of this ordinance.

59. Signs may be illuminated subject to obtaining a Building Permit.

60. The dispensary shall post and maintain professional quality sign consistent with LMMC Title 15 and Chapter

24.23 facing the parking lot(s) that reads "No loitering, no littering violators subject to arrest" in English andSpanish.

61. The operation of the business shall comply with State Licensing outlined in California Business and Professions Code, Division 8, Chapter 3.5 as amended and any other applicable laws or regulations.

62. Mobile dispensaries are prohibited.

63. The Project shall comply with the Development Standards of the underlying zone including but not limited to parking standards and requirements, trash and recycling enclosures, and landscape.

64. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for retail sales purposes only.

65. Performance entertainment as defined by LMMC Section 24.01.100 is prohibited.66. Provide proof of a bond to cover the costs of destruction of medical cannabis or medical cannabis products if necessitated by a violation of licensing requirements pursuant to applicable law.

67. Dispensaries shalf comply with the most recent adopted California Fire Codes and Standards.

68. A site plan and floor plan shall be submitted for review, approval and permits prior to commencing work. It is strongly encouraged that the applicant hires a design professional (Le. an Architect) to prepare the plandocuments.

69. A fire inspection is required prior to a certificate of occupancy or business license being issued. The applicant Shall ensure the dispensary is set up and ready for operation prior to the fire inspection.

70. The applicant shall provide a letter indicating any hazardous materials to be used or stored on site for the dispensary. This does not include normal business cleaning materials however; they must be in a limitedquantity.

71. The applicant shall provide a letter detailing the security provisions for the dispensary and how the applicable Building and Fire Code requirements will be achieved for emergency ingress and egress.

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY (SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES )

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY (MEASURE U NOTES)
Dispensaries
Dispensaries shall be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in General Commercial (C), Light Industrial and Commercial Services (CM) and Industrial Services and Manufacturing (M) zones subject to the following restrictions and regulations. a) Dispensaries shall maintain the following minimum separation between uses, as measured by path of travel. 1) 1,000 feet from City designated licensed childcare centers, playgrounds, minor-oriented facilities, other Dispensaries, or schools. For purposes of this section, school means any public or private institution of learning providing instruction in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12, inclusive, but does not include any private school in which education is primarily conducted in private homes.
b) Consultations by medical professionals shall not be a permitted at a dispensary. c) Lighting shall be provided to illuminate the interior of the dispensary, facade, and the immediate surrounding area, including any accessory uses, parking lots, and adjoining sidewalks. Lighting shall be hooded or oriented so as to deflect lightaway from adjacent properties. d) Security shall be provided at the dispensary which shall include operable cameras, alarms, and a security guard. The security guard shall be licensed by the State of California and be present on the premises during business hours.

Signs shall be posted on the outside of the dispensary and shall only contain the name of the business, limited to two colors. f) The name and emergency contact phone number of an operator or manager shall be posted in a location from outside of the dispensary in character size at least two inches in height. g) The dispensary shall operate only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00p.m., seven days a week. h) The use of Vending Machine which allow access to medical marijuana except by a responsible person, is prohibited. For purposes of this Section, a vending machine is any device which allows access to medical marijuana without a human intermediary.
i) Applicants for Conditional Use Permit for cannabis manufacturing must provide written proof that the building owner and management condone cannabis manufacturing activity on the premise. j) A Conditional Use Permit for a dispensary site shall expire no later than five (5) years from the date of issuance. k) The City has may charge a reasonable set application fee for a Conditional Use Permit for a dispensary site and, as well as reasonable set annual fee for maintaining the dispensary Site Conditional Use Permit. Such fees shall be established by the City planning department.
l) A Conditional Use Permit for a dispensary site may be revoked or suspended due to legitimate loitering complaints, noise complaints, upon City confirmation of the smell or loitering nuisance, or non-compliance with the Conditional Use Permit, or noncompliance with other applicable state or local regulation. The licensee shall have a reasonable opportunity and time to cure the complaint or possible non-compliance as defined in this section before being subject to revocation or suspension. m) The applicant must meet any additional standard criteria and fulfill any additional standard requirements typically associatedwith obtaining a Conditional Use Permit in the City. The City shall review all qualifying applications at a reasonable pace and level of review equivalent to other land use projects requiring a conditional use permit. n) Rules, regulations and local permitting requirements imposed on a Dispensary by the City shall conform to the State licensingrequirements for a Dispensary, as set forth by the California Business and Professions Code, Division 8, Chapter 3.5.

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY (SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES )

Page 276 of 291 ends

N 00°44'00" W 114.12'

EXISTING RESIDENCE
C-D-MU

E L C A J O N B L V D
A
A
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
C-D-MU

VACANT LOT

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

SIDEWALK

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN

NEW WALL

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

NEW RETAINING WALL

ADA PATH ( UPPER LEVEL VIA ELEVATOR )
C
C

PERMEABLE

PERMEABLE
GATE
GATE

LANDSCAPE AT

SERVICE AREA

PLANTER
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE AND

STREET TREE
4'-6"
LANDS
5'-0"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE AND

STREET TREE

INCLUDING
4'-4"
GRATE
4'-6"
LANDS
VAULT

ELEVATOR
OFFICE

MECH / ELEV
ROOM

RESTROOM
UNISEX
DIA. CLEAR
60" MIN.

LOBBY

GUARD STATION WITHMETAL WAND

SECURITY
CHECK

LEASE SPACE

DISPENSARY
POS

POS POS POS

POS POS POS POS

MAIN ENTRY

CHECK IN

RECEPTION

EMERGENCY

EXIT ONLY
RETAIL
( ALARMED )

LIMITED ACCESSFROM ELEVATORTO LEASE SPACE
ENTRY
ENTRY

FROM ABOVE

H I L L S I D E D R I V E

EXISTING RESIDENCE
4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPE

H I L L S I D E D R I V E ROLLING GATE
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
C-D-MU

COMP COMP COMP COMP
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL
CURB
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
L P
SEE C.1. FOR ADDITIONALCURB CUT INFORMATION

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE

POST FOR COVERED
PARKING ROOF ( TYP).

LINE OF COVERED PARKING
( NO CANNABIS PRODUCTS

PERMITTED )
B
B
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A3.1
NEW

FLOOR PLANS
N

LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN / ADA
3/16" = 1'-0"

LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN / ADA

ACCESSIBLE ELEVATOR
3'-0" ACCESSIBLE DOOR

ACCESSIBLE COUNTER AT CHECK INACCESSIBLE COUNTER AT DISPENSARY 123456 ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS

THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE DISABLED

ACCESSIBILITY REGULATIONS AS CONTAINED IN CHAPTERS
11B, TITLE 24 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.
1 2

EMERGENCY EXIT ONLY - ALARMED GATE
3 3
3 3 3
3 3
6 4
5

Page 277 of 291 ends

C-D-MU

VACANT LOT
13'-5"

PARKING

EXISTING RESIDENCE

EXISTING RETAINING WALL BELOW TO REMAIN
H/C
AISLE
H/C 8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPE

E L C A J O N B L V D

H I L L S I D E D R I V E
42" WALL

SIDEWALK
A
A

ROLLING GATE
7'-7" 16'-3"
13'-5"
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
B
B
C-D-MU

STDR STDR STDR STDR

COMP COMP COMP
19'-0"
25'-0"
16'-0" 27'-5" 9'-0" TYP. 8'-0" TYP.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN
20'-0"
COMP
4'-0"
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL
CURB
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING

GATE BELOW
C
C
20'-0"
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
3'-0"
L P
L P
L P
L P

FACE OF CURB

PLANTER

NEW STRUCTURAL WALL BELOW

RETAINING WALL VARIES BELOW

STRUCTURE BELOW

SERVICE AREA

ENTRY COVER
4'-0"
SEE C.1. FOR ADDITIONALCURB CUT INFORMATION

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

LOADING ZONE

MARKED NO PARKING

LOADING ZONENO PARKING SIGN

ELEVATOR

MAIN ENTRANCE TO DISPENSARY
6"
4'-0" 6"

POST FOR COVERED
PARKING ROOF ( TYP).

LINE OF COVERED PARKING

LINE OF COVERED PARKING
8" 8" 6" CURB ONE STORY METAL ROOFMECHANICAL TRASH ( BINS ) SCREEN 5'-0"
14'-7"
2'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8"
5'-0"
14'-7"
7'-10"
14'-7"
5'-0"
7'-10"
1 / 4" = 1' - 0"

TRASH ENCLOSURE

SIDE ELEVATION

FLOOR PLAN

FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

STUCCO W/ ROUND TOPSTUCCO REVEALSTUCCO

STUCCO W/ ROUND TOPSTUCCO REVEALSTUCCO

STUCCO W/ ROUND TOPSTUCCO REVEALSTUCCO

SOLID METAL

GATES PER

LA MESA

REQUIREMENTS
MECH

SCREEN TRASH
( BINS )
3'-0" 2'-11" . rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A3.2

UPPER LEVEL

FLOOR PLAN
N

UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
3/16" = 1'-0"

UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

Page 278 of 291 ends

BUILDING CODE, EXITING AND OCCUPANCY
NTS
BUILDING CODE DATAZONE C-D-MUBUILDING TYPE VBALLOWED AREA 9,000 SF AREA OF BUILDING 2,122 SF OCCUPANCY B,MSETBACKS PERMITTED 0'0" @ BULDING SEPARATION B-M NONE REQUIREDEXITING ANALYSISBUILDING: PROPOSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND RETAIL SPACEM USE 1537 SF / 60 = 26 OCCUPANTSB USE 585 SF /100 = 6 OCCUPANTSTOTAL = 32 OCCUPANTSREQUIRED EXIT LESS THAN 50 OCCUPANTS = 1 EXITEXITS PROVIDED = 1 EXIT N

SECURITY LOWER FLOOR PLAN
3 / 32" = 1' - 0"
N

DIRECTIONAL CAMERA

EXISTINGRESIDENCE
⅊
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
⅊
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
⅊
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
⅊
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
℄
A.C. PAVING
WM

SIDEWALK

DRIVEWAY

SIDEWALK
CONC.

LANDING
538
RET. WALL
552
CONC. PAD

DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN
3 / 32" = 1' - 0"
N

DEMOLITION WALLS
PROPOSED: FRONT 0'
SIDE 3'REAR 51'

GROSS FLOOR AREA ANALYSIS
NTS

REMOVE THISPORTION

REMOVE THISPORTION

EXISTINGRETAINING

WALL TO
REMAIN

EXISTING

RETAININGWALL TOREMAIN

WALLS TO REMAIN
1 SURVEILLANCE CAMERA PLACED

AT FACE LEVEL TO CAPTURE ALL INDIVIDUALS COMING AND GOING SECURITY NOTES:A) Alarm System: Provide a valid alarm Company Operator License.B) The site shall be alarmed with centrally monitored fire and burglary alarm system and monitored by an alarm company licensed by theState of California ( B & P Code 7590 et.seq.) C) Operable Cameras: Illustrate on the plans the locations where cameras will be placed around the building.

D) and E) Show and note on the floor plan that a surveillance camera shall be placed at face level to capture recording of every individual coming and going from the business for identification purposes.

F) 24-hour fixed camera video surveillance shall be available for 90 days after recording. The recording shall be of a sufficient quality to provideidentification of any individual being recorded; that the surveillance coversevery interior area and room and adjacent perimeter area within a minimum of 50 feet; and the City of La Mesa Police Department or other City authorized department shall have 24 hour remote access to the surveillancesystem.

VAULT

ELEVATOR
OFFICE

MECH / ELEV
ROOM

RESTROOM
UNISEX
DIA. CLEAR
60" MIN.

LOBBY

GUARD STATION WITHMETAL WAND

SECURITY
CHECK

DISPENSARY
POS

POS POS POS

POS POS POS POS

MAIN ENTRY

CHECK IN

RECEPTION

EMERGENCY

EXIT ONLY
( ALARMED )

LIMITED ACCESSFROM ELEVATORTO LEASE SPACE
ENTRY
ENTRY

FROM ABOVE
VAULT

ELEVATOR
OFFICE

MECH / ELEV
ROOM

RESTROOM
UNISEX
LOBBY

GUARD STATION WITHMETAL WAND
CHECK

SECURITY

LEASE SPACE

DISPENSARY
POS

POS POS POS

POS POS POS POS

MAIN ENTRY

CHECK IN

RECEPTION

EMERGENCY RETAIL EXIT ONLY
( ALARMED )

LIMITED ACCESSFROM ELEVATORTO LEASE SPACE
ENTRY
ENTRY

FROM ABOVE
957 SF
322 SF
269 SF
311 SF 263 SF
47'-10"
43'-3"
6'-4"
28'-8"

E L C A J O N B L V D

SIDEWALK
58'-0"
9'-10"
E L C A J O N B L V D SIDEWALK 4'x8' TREE WALKABLE GRATE AND STREET TREE 4'-6"
LANDS
4'-6"
LANDS
5'-0"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE ANDSTREET TREE

INCLUDING
4'-4"
GRATE
1 1
1 L P

VISIBLE TRIANGLE
C-D-MU

VACANT LOT
13'-5"

PARKING

EXISTING RESIDENCE

EXISTING RETAINING WALL BELOW TO REMAIN
H/C
AISLE
H/C 8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPE

E L C A J O N B L V D

H I L L S I D E D R I V E
42" WALL

SIDEWALK
A A

ROLLING GATE
7'-7" 16'-3"
13'-5"
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
C-D-MU

STDR STDR STDR STDR

COMP COMP COMP
19'-0"
16'-0" 27'-5" 9'-0" TYP. 8'-0" TYP.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN
20'-0"
COMP
4'-0"
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL
CURB
3' WALL @

THIS AREA
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING

GATE BELOW
C
C
20'-0"
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
3'-0"
L P

L P L P

FACE OF CURB

PLANTER

NEW STRUCTURAL WALL BELOW

RETAINING WALL VARIES BELOW

STRUCTURE BELOW

SERVICE AREA

ENTRY COVER
4'-0"
SEE C.1. FOR ADDITIONAL

CURB CUT INFORMATION

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

LOADING ZONE - NO PARKING

LOADING ZONENO PARKING SIGN
6"
4'-0" 6"

METAL ROOF

ELEVATOR
13'-5"
10'-4"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE ANDSTREET TREE
LANDS

INCLUDING
GRATE

GATE BELOW
4'-0"
4'-6"
5'-0"
4'-6"
LANDS
4'-4"
4'x8' TREEWALKABLE

GRATE ANDSTREET TREE

VISIBLE TRIANGLE

LANDSCAPE BELOW AT

SERVICE AREA

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

LANDSCAPE BELOW AT

SERVICE AREA
25'-0"

POST FOR COVERED
PARKING ROOF ( TYP).

LINE OF COVERED PARKING

LINE OF COVERED PARKING
8" 8"

DIRECTIONAL CAMERA

SECURITY UPPER FLOOR PLAN
3 / 32" = 1' - 0"
N

ONE STORY METAL ROOF

MECHANICAL
TRASH
( BINS )
SCREEN

LEASE SPACE
RETAIL
( NO CANNABIS PRODUCTS

PERMITTED )
B
B
( NO CANNABIS PRODUCTS

PERMITTED )
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A4

EXISTING & NEW

FLOOR PLANS

DEMOLITION AND SECURITY FLOOR PLANS

Page 279 of 291 ends

DRIVE
STREET
STREET
PL
PL
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"

HILLSIDE DRIVE WEST ELEVATION
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"

HILLSIDE DRIVE EAST ELEVATION

SIDEWALK

HILLSIDE

BOULEVARD

EL CAJON
38'-11"
38'-11"
PL PL
PL
PL
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"

HILLSIDE DRIVE NORTH ELEVATION
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"
HILLSIDE DRIVE SOUTH ELEVATION @ STREET

PLANTER
38'-11"
18'-7"

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN

LINE OF DISPENSARY WALL

EXISTING MASONRY WALL

TO REMAIN - PAINTED

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT NEW STUCCO WALL

NEW STUCCO WALL

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT

EXISTING MASONRY WALL

TO REMAIN - PAINTED

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN

LINE OF DISPENSARY WALL

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT NEW STUCCO WALL

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT

NEW STUCCO WALL

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

SPLIT FACE BASE

STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

BLACK FRAME

GLASS WDWS
STUCCO

WITH ANTI GRAFFITI COATING

LIGHTED STREET ADDRESS

EXISTING RETAINING

WALL TO REMAIN

EXISTING GRADEBEYOND

URBN LEAF

TRASH MECHANICAL ELEVATOR

HILLSIDE DRIVE SOUTH ELEVATION
@ ELEVATOR
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"
PL PL

URBN LEAF

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

SPLIT FACE BASE
STUCCO

BLACK SIGN LETTERS

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT

STUCCO WALL

WITH ANTI GRAFFITI COATING
3'-0"
4'-0"

WROUGHT IRON ROLLING GATE

EXISTINGRETAINING WALL

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADEBEYOND

PROPOSEDRETAINING WALL

PROPOSEDRETAINING WALL

EXISTING
GRADE
6'-0"

METAL BLACK

SERVICE GATE
6'-0"

UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
STUCCO

WITH ANTI

GRAFFITI COATING
24'-10"
4'-0"
3'-0"

PLANTER METAL BLACK

SERVICE GATE
9'-0"
8'-0" MIN
3060 EMERGENCY

EXIT GATE

SECURITY
GATE

STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF

STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A5.1

EXTERIOR

ELEVATIONS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

Page 280 of 291 ends

PL PL
PL
PL

PLANTER

EXISTING GRADEBEYOND

URBN LEAF

ELEVATOR
PL PL

URBN LEAF

WROUGHT IRON ROLLING GATE

EXISTING GRADEBEYOND
DRIVE
STREET
STREET
PL
PL

SIDEWALK

HILLSIDE

BOULEVARD

EL CAJON

TRASH MECHANICAL
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A5.2

PROPOSED
COLORS

ROOF STANDING SEAM - MEDIUM BRONZE
STUCCO - MERLEX P-100 WHITE
ACCENT STUCCO - MERLEX P-1661 LT.GREY

WINDOW / DOOR FRAMES - MATTE BLACK
GATES - VISTA BLACK # 56

WROUGHT IRON ROLLING GATE - BLACK

SPLIT FACE BLOCK

EXISTING MASONARY WALL PAINT
VISTA WHISPER GRAY # 178

LIGHT FIXTURES - BRUSHED ALUMINUM
1 23456789
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3 3 3
3 3
3 3
4 4 4 4 4
4 5
5 5
6 7
7 7 7
7 7
7 7
9 9

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COLORS
10 10
10 10
10 11 EMERGENCY EXIT ONLY
( NO PEDESTRIAN ACCESS )
11 11
4 STUCCO - MERLEX P-100 WHITE WITH

ANTI GRAFFITI COATING
12 ALUMINUM CANOPY
12 12
12 12
1 1
1 1
12 12
12

Page 281 of 291 ends

PARKING LEVEL
PL
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"
HILLSIDE DRIVE SECTION "A"

EXISTING GRADE

DISPENSARY
LOBBY
DRIVE

HILLSIDE

BOULEVARD

EL CAJON
5'-0"
11'-5"
11'-5"
38'-11"
GATE

TRASH AND MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN

NEW WALL

EXISTING GRADE
PL PL
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"
HILLSIDE DRIVE SECTION "C"

EXISTING

GRADE AT

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

DRIVEWAY BEYOND

WALL BEYOND

EXISTING GRADE
ELEVATOR 4'-0"
CANOPY @ ELEVATOR

WALKWAY LEVEL AT ELEVATOR

STUCCO REVEAL JOINT NEW STUCCO WALL
3'-0"
4'-0"

PARKING LOT

ADJACENT
SFD
9'-0"
8'-0" MIN
4' MAX ENCROACHMENT

SUBJECT TO EMRA

RECEPTION

RESTROOM DISPENSARY
PL

NEW RETAINING WALL

TRASH AND MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE

PLANTER WALL

WALKWAY
PL

RECEPTION

GRADE AT

ADJACENT

PROPERTY
HILLSIDE DRIVE SECTION "B"
3 / 16" = 1' - 0"

URBN LEAF

GRADE AT

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

DROP CEILING

DROP CEILING
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A6

ELEVATIONS

SECTIONS

Page 282 of 291 ends

PERSPECTIVE ELEVATOR AT PARKING LEVEL FRONT ELEVATION FROM EL CAJON BLVD

BIRDS EYE HILLSIDE DRIVE ELEVATION
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A7

RENDERS

EXTERIOR COLOR RENDERS
NTS

EXTERIOR COLOR RENDERS

Page 283 of 291 ends

SITE SITE FROM ECB SHOWING EXISTING WALLS SITE AND ADJACENT HOUSE FROM ECB DIRECTLY ACROSS ECB

LOOKING WEST AT SITE APARTMENT BUILDING EAST OF SITE ECB SIDEWALK LOOKING EAST NEAR BALTIMORE SIDEWALK LOOKING EAST

HILLSIDE AT GUAVA HILLSIDE AT SITE LOOKING TOWARD DEAD END . rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMD
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa10-10-19LUIS HDEZ
-------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
21 A8

SITE PHOTOS

SITE PHOTOS
NTS

SITE PHOTOS

Page 284 of 291 ends

. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMCC
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa04-25-17ARB
1 - SITE LTG - 08/26/20 ------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

LA MESA, CALIFORNIA
E1

ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS

LEGEND AND NOTES

Page 285 of 291 ends

C-D-MU

VACANT LOT

PARKING

EXISTING RESIDENCE
H/C
AISLE
H/C
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 LANDSCAPE

ONE STORY METAL ROOF

OF DISPENSARY BELOW

MECHANICAL
TRASH
SCREEN
42" WALL

ROLLING GATE
S 72°14'00" W 51.50'
"W 51.50'
N 00°44'00" W 114.12'
C-D-MU

STDR STDR STDR STDR

COMP COMP COMP

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN
COMP 4' WALL

GATE BELOW
4' WALL ABOVE PARKING
L P
L P

SERVICE AREA

ENTRY COVER

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

LOADING ZONE - NO PARKING

LANDSCAPE

METAL ROOF

ELEVATOR
TREE
KABLE
TE AND

EET TREE
LANDS

INCLUDING
GRATE

GATE BELOW
DS

LANDSCAPE BELOW AT

SERVICE AREA

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

POST FOR COVERED
PARKING ROOF ( TYP).

LINE OF COVERED PARKING

LINE OF COVERED PARKING
6" CURB
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
B
B

A A A A A A A
AAA

B B B B
B B
. rofessional Corporation, and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written permission of Scott Bernet Architects All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Scott Bernet Architects, a P Scott Bernet Architects
REVISIONS:PROJECT:DATE:DRAWN:SHEET NUMBER:

A Professional Corporation
2031 Second Ave., San Diego, CA 92101 619/237-9433 fax 619/237-9499 C
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMCC
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.

La Mesa04-25-17ARB
1 - SITE LTG - 08/26/20 ------
APPLICANT : WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587

LA MESA, CALIFORNIA
E2

SITE PARKING

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN

Page 286 of 291 ends

VACANT LOT

EXISTING RESIDENCE

E L C A J O N B L V D

H I L L S I D E D R I V E

TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT QTY
KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE FLAME TREE 24"BOX 1
PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 24"BOX 2

SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT QTY
AGAVE AMERICANA `VARIEGATA` VARIEGATED CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL 3 DIANELLA REVOLUTA `LITTLE REV` LITTLE REV FLAX LILY 5 GAL 23DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL 7 GREVILLEA X `PEACHES AND CREAM` GREVILLEA 5 GAL 3
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS `REGAL MIST` TM MUHLY 5 GAL 6
WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA COAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL 13

GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING QTY HEDERA HELIX ENGLISH IVY FLAT 12" o.c. 64LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS `YELLOW` TRAILING LANTANA 1 GAL 36" o.c. 15 MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM TRAILING MYOPORUM FLAT 12" o.c. 34

PLANT SCHEDULE

CONCEPTUAL

PLANTING PLAN
L-1.0 N O R T H
These designs, drawings and specifications
are the property and copyright of the
landscape architect and shall not be used in
connection with any other work except by
agreement with the landscape architect.

There shall be no changes or deviation
without the consent of the landscape
architect. Written dimensions shall be
verified on the job site. Any discrepancy
shall be brought to the notice of the
landscape architect prior to the
commencement of any work.
12315 OAK KNOLL RD, SUITE 300
URBN LEAF LA MESA INC.
7901 HILLSIDE DRIVE MMCC

LA MESA, CA
APPLICANT: WILLIE SENN 619-346-0587
0 SCALE:
feet 10 20 30
1" = 10'
Water Conservation Note:

This project has been designed to conserve water
using low water use plants and will incorporate dripirrigation to maximize water use efficiency. The plantmaterial will require low maintenance. Trees will beirrigated with a separate bubbler system.

All planting areas, excluding slopes over 3:1, will be
top dressed with a minimum of 2” depth shredded
bark mulch to retain soil moisture.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL

BELOW PARKING LOT PAVING ROLLING GATE
18" HT. RAISED PLANTER

OVER BOTTOM FLOOR ROOF
42" HT. WALL
This plan is consistent with the State of California
Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
4' X 8'
Landscape Area:

Total Landscape Area: 791 SF
Quantity of trees required; 1 per 500 SF= 2Quantity of trees provided: 3

TREE GRATE
(TYPICAL OF 2)

VISIBILITY TRIANGLE

VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE
*Landscape Note (Per cycle comment #48):

Landscape design and maintenance shall implement
applicable CPTED principles.

A. Trees shall be at least 8 feet above the ground
and bushes shall be trimmed to less than 3 feet
to allow for natural surveillance of the property.

B. Landscape shall not obstruct the view of any
windows, doorway, security cameras, and light.

LINE OF COVERED ROOF PARKING

Page 287 of 291 ends
Page 288 of 291 ends

C.1
9666 BUSINESSPARK AVENUE, SUITE 210

Page 289 of 291 ends

C.2
9666 BUSINESSPARK AVENUE, SUITE 210

Page 290 of 291 ends

ROOF STANDING SEAM - MEDIUM BRONZE STUCCO - MERLEX P-100 WHITE ACCENT STUCCO - MERLEX P-1661 LT.GREY WROUGHT IRON ROLLING GATE - BLACK LIGHT FIXTURES - BRUSHED ALUMINUM EXISTING MASONARY WALL PAINT VISTA WHISPER GRAY # 178 WINDOW / DOOR FRAMES - MATTE BLACK GATES - VISTA BLACK # 56 SPLIT FACE BLOCK CUP - 17-88 Page 291 of 291 7901 HILLSIDE MATERIALS BOARD

← All documents from this meeting