Agenda packet — La Mesa City Council, October 11, 2022 (part 3 of 3)

KTUA
Whalen/
Singleton/L
angdon Jacob Leon
Alex
Samarin KTUA Staff
Alan
Pennington
Khushboo
Hussain
Matrix
Staff
Kim
Baranek TBD
Principal
Planner
Project
Manager
Assist
PM/GIS
Park
Planners
Senior
Analyst
Senior
Analyst TBD
Principal
Planner Staff
$185 $145 $145 $120 $200 $185 $110 $180 $110 Hours Labor Totals

CITY OF LA MESA

RECREATION & PARKS MASTER PLAN
Matrix Baranek
TASK 7 | DRAFT MASTER PLAN DOCUMENT

7.1 Parks and Facilities
Identify needs for each park and conflicts in current layout 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Prioritize projects and investment priorities per park 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Identify goals, priorities, policies, standards per park 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Identify phasing to improve equity and meet standards 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Determinine minimum maintenance standards 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Summarize usage and identify minimum maintenance per park 1 2 6 9 $1,155

7.2 Amenities
Recommend universal access for playgrounds and seating 1 6 7 $865 Balance shortages of high prioritiy amenities and suggest parks to solve 1 6 7 $865 Identify park infill and amenitiy opportunities 1 6 7 $865 Develop public safety guidelines including lighting 1 6 7 $865 Identify trail opportunities and other physical workout opportunities 1 0 6 7 $865

7.3 Connectivity and Accessibility
Map barriers to safe access to parks within parksheds 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Verotu existing/proposed walk/bike facilities in parkshed 1 2 6 9 $1,155 Identify connectivity opportunities 1 2 6 9 $1,155
Identify new linear parks, urban greening, active transportation routes 1 2 6 9 $1,155

7.4 Development of New Parks and Open Space
Prepare project descriptions & infill amenity graphics 4 12 16 $2,020 Prepare general planning costs for new and expanded parks 2 12 14 $1,730 Prepare general planning costs for infill amenity projects 2 8 10 $1,250 Prepare GIS maps of vacant and underutilized parcels 1 8 9 $1,305 Identify land for park connections or to address park gaps 1 4 8 13 $1,685 Recommend new parks to meet demand and recreation gaps 4 2 8 14 $1,830

7.5 Draft Master Plan
Prepare text, tables, maps 2 8 12 24 46 $6,150
Prepare renderings and other graphics for priority projects 2 8 8 24 42 $5,570 Prepare executive summary and presentation materials 2 6 4 12 24 $3,260 Total Task 7 Hours: 6 51 58 198 0 0 0 0 0 313
Total Task 7 Costs: $1,110 $7,395 $8,410 $23,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,675 check $40,675
TASK 8 | REVIEW OF DRAFT MASTER PLAN

8.1 Submit draft master plan for review 2 4 4 6 16 $2,250 Total Task 8 Hours: 2 4 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 16
Total Task 8 Costs: $370 $580 $580 $720 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250

Page 284 of 366 ends

CITY OF LA MESA

RECREATION & PARKS MASTER PLAN
Matrix Baranek
TASK 9 | CEQA - DRAFT CEQA DOCUMENT CIRCULATED FOR PUBLIC REVIEW

9.1 General Plan and CEQA conformance 1 1 4 4 10 $1,490

9.2 Draft CE document 1 1 20 40 62 $8,330

9.3 Final CE document 1 1 18 30 50 $6,870

9.4 Prepare and file CEQA notice of exemption 2 6 8 $1,020

9.5 Meetings with city 1 6 7 $1,225

9.6 Conformation review of circulation element and new access options 1 1 8 4 14 $2,210

9.7 Provide conformance review for GP affecting parks & growth 1 1 8 4 14 $2,210 Total Task 9 Hours: 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 66 88 165
Total Task 9 Costs: $925 $870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,880 $9,680 $23,355 check $23,355
TASK 10 | CITY REVIEW

10.1 Submit draft CEQA document for review and address comments 2 2 4 8 $1,090 Total Task 10 Hours: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 8
Total Task 10 Costs: $0 $290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360 $440 $1,090 check $1,090
TASK 11 | FINALIZE MASTER PLAN

11.1 Incorporate comments from staff and presentations 1 4 4 12 21 $2,785

11.2 Pre-final document production & review 4 10 20 40 74 $9,890 Total Task 11 Hours: 5 14 24 52 0 0 0 0 0 95
Total Task 11 Costs: $925 $2,030 $3,480 $6,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,675 check $12,675
TASK 12 | PUBLIC HEARINGS

12.1 Public hearings
Community Services Commission (1) 2 4 4 10 $1,430
Community Relations & Veterans Commission (1) 2 4 4 10 $1,430 Planning Commission (2) 4 8 8 20 $2,860
Arts & Culture Commission (1) 2 4 4 10 $1,430
City Council (2) 8 8 4 20 $3,120
Two Additional Public Hearing Based Meetings (2) 4 4 6 14 $2,040 Total Task 12 Hours: 22 32 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 84
Total Task 12 Costs: $4,070 $4,640 $0 $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,310 check $12,310

Page 285 of 366 ends

CITY OF LA MESA

RECREATION & PARKS MASTER PLAN
Matrix Baranek
TASK 13 | ADOPTION OF THE MASTER PLAN

13.1 Adoption of Master Plan
Incorporate comments from staff and presentations 2 4 4 8 18 $2,490 Final document production & review 2 8 8 8 26 $3,650
Package all files for final deliverable 2 2 4 8 $1,060
Total Task 13 Hours: 4 14 14 20 0 0 0 0 0 52
Total Task 13 Costs: $740 $2,030 $2,030 $2,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,200 check $7,200

SUMMARY BASE CONTRACT
BASE TASK SUMMARY: KTUA Totals Totals
Project Total Base Hours: 92 295 206 544 68 128 178 74 92 1,677 Total Base Costs: $17,020 $42,775 $29,870 $65,280 $13,600 $23,680 $19,580 $13,320 $10,120 $235,245 GRAND TOTAL LABOR PER FIRM: $154,945 $56,860 $23,440 $235,245 Printed Documents (20 Total) $740 $740
Workshop and Outreach Printed Materials $200 $200
Total of Direct Costs $940 $0 $0 $940
GRAND TOTAL LABOR AND MATERIALS: $155,885 $56,860 $23,440 $236,185

66.00% 24.07% 9.92% 100%
check $236,185
5% Pulled for Contingency
Calculated contingency for the project allowing the City to hold for unforseen scope additions or meeting requirements: $11,809 $247,994
Matrix Baranek

Page 286 of 366 ends

Page 287 of 366 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 11, 2022
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT BY
REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, AND TO

REPEAL PREVIOUS ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT

THEREWITH
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Title 14 of the La Mesa Municipal Code to adopt the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, incorporating the 2021 International Building Code, the 2021 International Residential Code, the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code, and the 2020 National Electrical Code, as required by law, and repeal previous ordinances in conflict therewith?
Recommendation:

1. Introduce for First Reading an Ordinance (Attachment A) to amend La Mesa Municipal Code Title 14 to adopt the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, incorporating the 2021 International Building Code, the 2021 International Residential Code, the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code, and the 2020 National Electrical Code, as required by law, and repeal previous ordinances in conflict therewith.

2. Schedule the Second Reading of the Ordinance and the required public hearing for November 22, 2022.

Page 288 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
Fiscal Impact:

There are no direct fiscal impacts related to adoption of the 2022 California Building Code.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services
 Ensure safe and affordable homes for La Mesa's current and future residents
DISCUSSION:

The various model technical codes are updated every three years. The latest editions of the codes were issued in 2021, with the exception of the National Electrical Code, which was published in 2020. State law requires that the City of La Mesa adopt the same editions of the model technical codes as the State adopts. The California Building Standards Commission recently published and adopted the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, incorporating the 2021 International Building Code, the 2021 International Residential Code, the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code, and the 2020 National Electrical Code.

The State Health and Safety Code limits the ability of local jurisdictions to amend the State Building Standards Code. Accordingly, local technical amendments of the codes are limited to those required to address local climatic, geological or topographical conditions. This 2022 code adoption maintains existing La Mesa amendments related weathering.

In prior code adoption cycles, La Mesa amendments included amendments to Appendix J, Grading, of the California Building Code. The La Mesa amendments exempted grading that resulted in a cut two feet or less, a fill of one foot or less, or 50 cubic yards or less of excavation. Exemptions allowed by other jurisdictions nearby range from one to eight feet of cut or fill and up to 200 yards of excavation (most jurisdictions exempt up to 50 cubic yards). To facilitate development of small projects such as single-family homes, accessory dwelling units, and small commercial structures, the proposed amendments for the 2022 code adoption increase the exemption for cut and fill slopes to three feet each and increases the excavation exemption to up to 100 cubic yards.

This change will relieve the burden on small projects while continuing to protect public safety by requiring grading permits for larger projects.

The proposed draft ordinance is attached as Attachment A. Attachment B is a

Page 289 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
summary of code changes relevant to local building construction.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

2. Schedule the Second Reading of the Ordinance and the required public hearing for November 22, 2022.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments:

A. Draft Ordinance to amend Title 14 to adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Code
B. Review of changes in the 2022 California Building Standards Code

Page 290 of 366 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, INCORPORATING THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, THE 2021 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, THE 2021 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, AND THE 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AND AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE LA MESA

MUNICIPAL CODE AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT

THEREWITH
The City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings of Local Conditions. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:

A. Mediterranean weather conditions, hilly terrain, density of development, canyons with dry dense brush, and the environment existing in the City of La Mesa constitute local conditions which require that the California Building Code and the California Residential Code be modified as expressed herein.

B. The high water table expansive clay-like soils and history of unregulated grading, including uncompacted fills existing in the City of La Mesa constitute, local conditions which require that the California Building Code be modified as expressed herein.

SECTION 2. Chapter 14.04 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.04

BUILDING CODE

14.04.010 Adoption of the California Building Code. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 2, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), incorporating the International Building Code, 2021 Edition, published by the International Code Council. Said document is hereby adopted as the Building Code of the City of La Mesa for regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings or structures within the City of La Mesa. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.” SECTION 3. Chapter 14.05 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:

Page 291 of 366 ends

“Chapter 14.05

GRADING

14.05.010 Adoption of Appendix J of the California Building Code. There is hereby adopted by the City of La Mesa for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing the excavation and grading on private property and the issuance of permits and providing for the inspection thereof, Appendix J of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of La Mesa.

14.05.020 Permits Required. Section J103.2 of Appendix J of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, adopted by reference in Section 14.05.010 hereof is hereby amended to read as follows:

J103.2 Exemptions. A grading permit shall not be required for the following:

8. An excavation or fill which is less than three (3) feet (915 mm) in depth and does not create a slope steeper than two horizontal to one vertical and does not exceed 100 cubic yards (76.5 m3) on any one lot and does not obstruct or alter a drainage course.

SECTION 4. Chapter 14.08 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.08

PLUMBING CODE

14.08.010 Adoption of the California Plumbing Code. There is hereby adopted by the City of La Mesa for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing the installation, alteration, or repair of plumbing and drainage systems, the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition (Part 5, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), incorporating the Uniform Plumbing Code, 2021 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.”
SECTION 5. Chapter 14.09 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.09

MECHANICAL CODE

14.09.010 Adoption of the California Mechanical Code. There is hereby adopted by the City of La Mesa for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing the design, installation, alteration, or repair of heating, ventilating, cooling, refrigeration systems, incinerators and other miscellaneous heating producing appliances within the City of La Mesa, the California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition, (Part 4, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), incorporating the Uniform Mechanical Code, 2021 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials. There is one (1) copy of said code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.”
SECTION 6. Chapter 14.10 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.10

Page 292 of 366 ends

ELECTRICAL CODE

14.10.010 Adoption of the California Electrical Code. There is hereby adopted by the City of La Mesa for the purpose of operation and maintenance of all electrical wiring and electrical apparatus of any nature, whether inside or outside of any building, the California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition (Part 3, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), incorporating the National Electrical Code, 2020 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.”
SECTION 7. Chapter 14.12 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.12

RESIDENTIAL CODE

14.12.010 Adoption of the California Residential Code. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition (Part 2.5, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), incorporating the International Residential Code, 2021 Edition, published by the International Code Council. Said document is hereby adopted as the Residential Code of the City of La Mesa for regulating the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal and demolition of every detached one- and two-family dwelling, efficiency dwelling unit, and townhouse not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress and structures accessory thereto within the City of La Mesa. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.

14.12.020 Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria. Table R301.2(1) of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, adopted by reference in Section 14.12.010 hereof is hereby amended to read as follows:

TABLE R301.2(1)

CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA
Ground
Snow Load
Wind Design
Seismic
Design
Category
Subject to Damage from
Winter
Design
Tempe
Ice Barrier
Underlayment
Requiredh
Flood
Hazardg
Air
Freezing
Indexi
Mean
Annual
Tempj
Wind Speedd
(mph)
Topographic Effectsk WeatheringaFrost Line
Depthb Termitec
Zero 85 No D1 Negligible 12” Very Heavy 44oF No Footnote ‘g’ Zero 60oF For SI: 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479kPa, 1 mile per hour = 0.447m/s.

Footnotes:
a. Weathering may require a higher strength concrete or grade of masonry than necessary to satisfy the structural requirements of this code. The weathering column shall be filled in with the weathering index (i.e., “negligible, “moderate” or “severe”) for concrete as determined from the Weathering Probability Map [Figure R301.2(3)]. The grade of masonry units shall be determined from ASTM C34, C55, C62, C73, C90, C129, C145, C216 or C652. b. The frost line depth may require deeper footings than indicated in Figure R403.1(1). The jurisdiction shall fill in the frost depth column with the minimum depth of footing below finish grade.

Page 293 of 366 ends

c. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table to indicate the need for protection depending on whether there has been a history of local subterranean termite damage. d. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the wind speed from the basic wind speed map [Figure R301.2(4)]. Wind exposure category shall be determined on a sitespecific basis in accordance with Section R301.2.1.4. e. Temperatures shall be permitted to reflect local climates or local weather experience as determined by the Building Official.
f. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the seismic design category determined from Section R301.2.2.1.
g. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with:
(a) the date of the jurisdiction’s entry into the National Flood Insurance Program (date of adoption of the first code or ordinance for management of flood hazard areas), i.e., City of La Mesa Ordinance 2002-2721 06/25/2002,
(b) the date(s) of the Flood Insurance Study, i.e., Study date 01/31/2001 adopted by Ordinance 2002-2721;
(c) the panel numbers and dates of all currently effective FIRMs and FBFMs or other flood hazard map adopted by the authority having jurisdiction, as amended, i.e., Panel 06073C1643H current effective date 09/28/2006; Panel 06073C1644G current effective date 09/05/2006.
h. In accordance with Sections R905.2.7.1, R905.4.3.1, R905.5.3.1, R905.6.3.1, R905.7.3.1 and R905.8.3.1, where there has been a history of local damage from the effects of ice damming, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with “YES”. Otherwise, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with “NO”. i. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the 100-year return period air freezing index (BF-days) from Figure R403.3(2) or from the 100-year (99%) value on the National Climatic Data Center data table “Air Freezing Index – USA Method (Base 32o)” at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/fpsf.html.
j. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the mean annual temperature from the National Climatic Data Center data table “Air Freezing Index – USA Method (Base 32oF)” at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/fpsf.html.
k. In accordance with Section R301.2.1.5, where there is local historical data documenting structural damage to buildings due to topographic wind speed up effects, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with “YES.” Otherwise the jurisdiction shall indicate “NO” in this part of the table.”

Page 294 of 366 ends

SECTION 8. Chapter 14.13 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:
“Chapter 14.13

GREEN BUILDING CODE

14.13.010 Adoption of the California Green Building Standards Code. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Part 11, Title 24, California Code of Regulations). Said document is hereby adopted as the Green Building Code of the City of La Mesa for establishing minimum standards to improve public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.” SECTION 9. Chapter 14.14 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows
“Chapter 14.14

EXISTING BUILDING CODE

14.14.010 Adoption of the California Existing Building Code. There is hereby adopted by reference the California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 10, Title 24, California Code of Regulations), based on the 2021 International Existing Building Code. Said document is hereby adopted as the Existing Building Code of the City of La Mesa for regulating alteration, repair, addition, and change of occupancy or relocation of existing building and structures. There is one (1) copy of said Code on file in the office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public as required by law.”
SECTION 10. Constitutionality. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council of the City of La Mesa hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, respective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid. Such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of the Ordinance are declared to be severable.

SECTION 11. This Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2023 and the City Clerk of the City of La Mesa is hereby authorized to use summary publication procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 utilizing the Daily Transcript, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of La Mesa.

Page 295 of 366 ends

INTRODUCED AND READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 11th day of October 2022, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 22nd day of November 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 296 of 366 ends

Review of changes in the 2022 California Building Standards Code The following provides a review of the Building Code Adoption process and a summary of significant changes in the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) compared to the existing code affecting permits in the City of La Mesa.

Adoption process
State Law requires that the City of La Mesa adopt the same edition of the model technical codes as adopted and amended by the State. The California Building Standards Code incorporating the latest edition of the model technical codes applies in all parts of California. Failure to adopt the codes within 180 days of State adoption results in the codes being enforced by the City by default. The California Building Standards Commission has published and adopted the 2022 Edition of the California Building Standards Code that incorporates the 2021 International Building Code, the 2021 International Residential Code, the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code, 2020 National Electrical Code, 2022 California Green Building Standards Code and the 2022 California Existing Building Code, based on 2021 International Existing Building Code.

Section 18947.5 of the State Health and Safety Code provides that local amendments to the State's Building Standard for all occupancies are limited to those amendments required to addresslocalclimatic,geological ortopographical conditions.

Summary
The following is a summary of the Building Codes that staff has identified as relevant to future design and development within the City of La Mesa. The Residential Code brings important updates to “Aging in place” design to contribute towards California’s housing goals. The 2022 Energy Code encourages the state’s clean energy goals with efficient electric heat pumps and electric-ready requirements for new homes. It expands on solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards, strengthens ventilation standards, and more.

The 2022 California Green Code brings progressive changes related to electric vehicle (EV) charging that account for the Governor’s Executive Orders to achieve over 1.5 million zero emission vehicles (ZEV’s) on California roadways in 2025. Furthermore, the Building, Residential, Plumbing and Mechanical codes all officially changed permit expirations from 180 days to 12 months, in agreement with La Mesa’s existing Municipal Code. 2022California Building Code (2021 International Building Code) CCR Title 24 Part 2
CBC 105.5.1 Permit expiration
New section changed permit expiration from 180 days to 12 months.

CBC 310.3 Residential Group R- 2
Amended definition for Group R-2 to meet requirements of SB 234, Small and large family child care in apartment houses can operate in R-2 occupancies when they comply with Health and Safety Codes.

Page 297 of 366 ends

CBC 508 Mixed Use and Occupancy
Amendment permitting the consideration of some uses as accessory occupancies, mainly in medical and long-term care facility occupancy exterior entrances.

CBC 710A Accessory Buildings and Misc Structures
Clarifies that Group U occupancy accessory buildings shall conform to this section.

Amendment and subsections that are organized by categories of distances from applicable buildings and mandate enforcement for buildings greater than 120 sq feet.

CBC 903.3.1.1.3 Solar Photovoltaic power systems
Amendment to delete requirement for the installation of smoke detectors in outdoor locations as a substitute for sprinkler protection.

CBC 11B 108 Maintenance of Accessible Features
Added requirements to include facilities regulated by Ch 11B. 2022 California Residential Code(2021 International Residential Code) CCR Title 24 Part 2.5
CRC 105 Permit expiration
New section changed permit expiration from 180 days to 12 months.

CRC 326 Habitable Attics
New section that states a habitable attic shall be considered a story above grade plane.

CRC 327 Aging in place design and fall protection
Sets infrastructure in new residential construction for grab bars, electrical control height, and door sizing for at least one bedroom and one bath on the entry level. 2022 California Electrical Code (2020 National Electrical Code) CCR Title 24 Part3
Article 404.4 Damp or Wet Locations. (C)
Switches in Tub or Shower Spaces Amendment to reduce the restriction distance for the installation of receptacles from five feet to three feet horizontally. 2022 California Mechanical Code (2020 Uniform Mechanical Code) CCR Title 24 Part 4
CMC 104.4.3.1 Permit Expiration
New section changed permit expiration from 180 days to 12 months. 2022 California Plumbing Code (2020 Uniform Plumbing Code) CCR Title 24 Part 5
CPC 105.5.1 Permit Expiration

Page 298 of 366 ends

New section changed permit expiration from 180 days to 12 months. 2022 California Energy Code (2019 California Energy Code) CCR Title 24 Part 6
A) Residential
Section §150.1(c)6 Space heating equipment must be a heat pump in climate zones 3, 4, 13, and 14. In other climate zones it can be either a heat pump or a gas heating system.

Section §150.1(c)8 Water heating equipment must be a HPWH meeting certain criteria or solar water heating system with electric backup.

Section §150.0(s) New energy storage system (ESS) ready requirements, including interconnection equipment or a dedicated raceway, a minimum of four branch circuits, a minimum busbar rating of 225 amps, and space for future installation of a system isolation equipment or transfer switch.

Section §150.0(t)-(v) New electric ready requirements for space heating, cooking, and clothes dryers when gas equipment is installed. Electrical infrastructure must be provided and reserved to the equipment location for the future installation of electrical appliances.

Section §150.1(c)14 No PV system required when size is less than 1.8 kWdc.

B) Non Residential
Section §140.10 New prescriptive requirements added for PV and battery storage systems for specific building types.

Section §140.1(b) Energy Commission-approved shared solar PV, other renewable electric generation system, or ESS may be used to meet PV or ESS requirements using the performance method.
2022 California Green Building Standards Code
CCR Title 24 Part 11
A) Residential

4.106.4 and subsections. EV charging for new construction Expanded EV charging requirements to installation of EV charging receptacles and EV chargers (EVSE). Modified Exception 1 to address situations in which there is no local utility power supply or when the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. Repealed references to specific dollar amounts for exceptions due to variations in utility costs based upon locations. Included an exception related to adverse impact to construction cost of a project, similar to the provision for nonresidential EV charging.

4.106.4.2 New multifamily dwellings, hotels and motels and new residential parking facilities
New regulation to clarify that calculations for EV spaces are to be rounded up to the

Page 299 of 366 ends

nearest whole number and EV spaces to be counted as parking spaces only for the purposes of meeting parking space requirements at the local level (Vehicle Code Section 22511.2).

4.106.4.2.1 Multifamily development projects with less than 20 dwelling units; and hotels and motels with less than 20 sleeping units or guest rooms New regulation requiring that ten percent of the total number of parking spaces on a building site support future Level 2 EVSE, the installation of EV ready spaces for twentyfive percent (25%) of the total number of parking spaces equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles, and clarification that no more than one receptacle must be installed per dwelling unit.

4.106.4.2.2 Multifamily development projects with 20 or more dwelling units, hotels and motels with 20 or more sleeping units or guest rooms
New regulations requiring that ten percent (10%) of the total number of parking spaces on site support future Level 2 EVSE; the installation of EV-ready spaces for twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of parking spaces equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles; and five percent (5%) of the total number of parking spaces shall be equipped with Level 2 EVSE. The use of an ALMS is allowed when low-power Level 2 EV charging receptacles or Level 2 EVSE are installed beyond the minimum required.

4.106.4.2.2.1 Electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) Added requirements for space location and dimensions, with a reference to the California Building Code to address accessibility.

4.106.4.2.3 EV space requirements
Amended requirements for single and multiple EV spaces, and added a requirement for EV-ready space signage.

4.106.4.3 Electric vehicle charging for additions and alterations of parking facilities serving existing multifamily buildings
Expanded EV charging infrastructure for additions and alterations triggered when new parking facilities are added, or electrical systems or lighting of existing parking facilities are added or altered, and the work requires a building permit. The new regulation requires that 10 percent (10%) of the total number of parking spaces being added or altered be EV capable to support future Level 2 EVSE.

B) Non-Residential

5.106.5.2 Designated parking for clean air vehicles
Repealed the mandatory requirement for designated parking for clean air vehicles.

5.106.5.3 Electric vehicle (EV) charging and subsections Amended to increase the EV capable space percentages and add a new requirement for installed Level 2 or DCFC chargers.

5.106.5.4 Electric vehicle (EV) charging: medium-duty and heavy-duty and subsections Added new regulations for electric vehicle charging readiness requirements for new construction of warehouses, grocery stores and retail stores with planned off-street loading spaces.

Page 300 of 366 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 11, 2022
SUBJECT: PROJECT 2022-0770 (BINOTTI) – CONSIDERATION

OF A REQUEST TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 9190 BRIER ROAD, APN 490-402-72-00
IN THE R1S-BT (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL / BRIER

TRACT OVERLAY) ZONE AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK

AND TO ESTABLISH A PROPERTY PRESERVATION
(MILLS ACT) AGREEMENT FOR THE SITE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Does the property at 9190 Brier Road known as the Stanley and Virginia Scott House qualify for designation as a historic landmark, and should the City enter into property preservation (Mills Act) agreement with the owner? Recommendation:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to 1) designate the Stanley and Virginia Scott House at 9190 Brier Road as a historic landmark (Attachment A) and 2) enter into a Mills Act Property Preservation Agreement with the property owner (Attachment B).

Fiscal Impact:

The amount of property tax to the City would be reduced by approximately $600 annually. In exchange for discounted property taxes, the City receives guaranteed property maintenance and improvements to ensure the ongoing preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration of Mills Act properties. Well maintained historic landmarks can increase property values in the neighborhood.

Page 301 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 2 of 6
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
 Ensure safe and affordable homes for La Mesa's current and future residents
Environmental Review:

This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331.

BACKGROUND:

Chapter 25.03 of the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance provides for the designation of historic landmarks by the City Council. A cultural resource may be designated a historic landmark if it meets one or more of eight criteria listed below.

A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship;
D. It is representative of the notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect;
E. It is identified with a person or groups who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City;
F. It embodies elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail materials, or craftsmanship;
G. It is an archeological or paleontological site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value; or
H. It is a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of sites, buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement.

Page 302 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 3 of 6
Properties with landmark designation are eligible for a reduced property tax assessment through the Mills Act, and the owners have applied for this benefit in conjunction with the landmark nomination. California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into property preservation agreements with owners of qualified historical properties to ensure the preservation, maintenance and restoration of historic properties through reduced property tax assessments. This program, known as the Mills Act, provides for a 10-year preservation agreement. Each year, on the anniversary of the effective date of the Agreement, a year is automatically added to the initial term of the agreement unless either party files a notice of non-renewal.

Alterations to historic landmarks are subject to development approval by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to ensure that cultural resources are being maintained in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

The owners of 9190 Brier Road have nominated the property to the local historic landmark registry. On September 6, 2022, the HPC voted 4-0 to adopt resolutions recommending that the City Council approve historical landmark designation and enter into a Mills Act Preservation Agreement with the owners. Resolutions memorializing the HPC’s actions are provided as Attachments C and D.

DISCUSSION:

Located on the east side of Brier Road
between Briercrest Drive and Bramble Road,
the 1.3-acre site is developed with a singlefamily residence, attached garage, detached accessory structure, and pool. The
improvements are situated on the westerly
half of the site, facing the street. Much of the
area between the house and the street
contains a paved, looped driveway. The rear
half of the site slopes downhill towards the
east. When the property was originally
developed, the lot included an additional 80-
foot wide strip of land to the southeast. The
southeasterly 80 feet, totaling one-half-acre,
was split from the original site by a parcel
map recorded in 2020. A vicinity map is
shown below, and the Assessor Parcel map
is provided as Attachment E.

Page 303 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 4 of 6
As described in the nomination report, Attachment G, the residence is a custom ranch built in 1950 for local developer Stanley Scott and his family. Stanley Scott was a partner in Jackson & Scott Builders, Inc., prolific builders of over 3,000 homes in San Diego County during the post-WWII development boom. The years of residence for the Scott family, 1950-1962, were the peak building period for Jackson & Scott.

The house embodies a typical mid-century
aesthetic on both the interior and exterior and is in
excellent near-original condition. The house is long
and low and sits wide to the street. Exterior
character defining features include a low-sloped
gable roof with cedar shingles, walls of white brick
with weeping mortar and vertical board and batten
siding, and a prominent brick chimney. Contributing
interior elements include vaulted open beam
ceilings, wood parquet flooring, an exposed red
brick double-sided fireplace, and unpainted cedar
paneling. Contributing site improvements include
the pool and basket-weave brickwork in the front
and back patios. The driveway layout retains its
original configuration as well. Overall, the
craftsmanship is of above-average quality and both
the house and site improvements retain integrity of
location, design, setting, materials, workmanship,
feeling and association.

The Historic Preservation Commission concluded
that based on the architectural description and
analysis contained within the statement of
significance the property is eligible for landmark
designation under four eligibility criteria. As relates to architecture and design, the resource embodies
distinctive characteristics of the Custom Ranch
sub-style of Midcentury Modern (Criterion C), and
embodies elements of outstanding attention to
architectural design, detail materials, and
craftsmanship (Criterion F). For being associated with persons significant in local history, the property is significant under Criterion B, and for being the work of a locally acclaimed builder, the resource meets Criterion D.

Page 304 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 5 of 6
Mills Act Agreement
Planned improvements identified by the owners are listed below. Those improvements would be funded with the Mills Act tax savings and are proposed for inclusion in the Mills Act agreement, with a recommended timeline of five years for completion:
 Replace cedar shake roofing with shake-like tile, similar in size and texture to the existing shakes (by 2023).
 Repair broken brick mortar from wear/sprinklers in front yard and around the pool (by 2023).
 Repair broken brickwork throughout landscaping (by 2023).  Replace all rotten/falling fencing street-side with like-kind 2x4 white fencing (by 2023)
 Repair and replace deteriorated board and batten siding in-kind as needed (by 2025)
 Maintain original craftsman woodwork including: built-in closets, doors, and unpainted cedar paneling in main living spaces (ongoing)  Maintain mature citrus and eucalyptus trees that are important to area history.

Replace aging citrus trees with new citrus as needed (ongoing) Public Notice of Project
Notification of the October 11, 2022, public hearing to consider the historic landmark application and preservation agreement was published in the Daily Transcript and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on September 30, 2022. One comment letter in support of the nomination has been received (Attachment F).

Environmental Review
The historic landmark nomination request is exempt from environmental review pursuant to categorical exemption Class 1, Existing Facilities, and categorical exemption Class 31, Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation, as provided by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331, respectively. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility. Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to

Page 305 of 366 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 11, 2022
Page: 6 of 6
protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. None of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 apply.

CONCLUSION:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the draft resolutions provided as Attachments A and B to designate the Stanley and Virginia Scott House at 9190 Brier Road as a historic landmark and execute the Mills Act Preservation Agreement.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments:

A. Draft Council Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation B. Draft Council Resolution for Mills Act Agreement
C. Resolution HPC 2022-04 Recommending Landmark Designation D. Resolution HPC 2022-05 Recommending a Mills Act Agreement E. Assessor Parcel Map Sheet
F. Correspondence
G. Historic Landmark Nomination Report

Page 306 of 366 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

DESIGNATING THE STANLEY AND VIRGINIA SCOTT HOUSE LOCATED AT 9190 BRIER ROAD, APN 490-402-72-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK ________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Bryan and Catherine Binotti, owners of the property located at 9190 Brier Road, APN 490-402-72-00 in the R1S-BT (Suburban Residential/Brier Tract Overlay) zone, have submitted a request to designate the property as a local historic landmark of the City of La Mesa; WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of La Mesa held a duly noticed public hearing on September 6, 2022, and accepted public testimony in considering the request;
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission did adopt Resolution HPC 2022-04 on September 6, 2022, recommending to the City Council designation of the Stanley and Virginia Scott House, located at 9190 Brier Road, as a Historic Landmark; WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered a staff report on the Historic Preservation Commission’s determination; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on October 11, 2022, and accepted public testimony in considering Project 2022-0770, a request to designate the Stanley and Virginia Scott House at 9190 Brier Road as a historic landmark in the City of La Mesa.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility.

Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. The project meets the criteria for the exemptions and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. That the project complies with Section 25.03.010 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Historic Landmark and Historic District Designation Criteria, finding that Criterion B, C, D, and F of the Section apply to the historical and cultural significance of the property.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

Page 307 of 366 ends

2. The City Council designates the Stanley and Virginia Scott House, located at 9190 Brier Road and further described in “Exhibit A”, attached thereto and made a part thereof, as a Historic Landmark.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 11th day of October, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 308 of 366 ends

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Real property located in the City of La Mesa, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows:

PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 21817, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 04, 2020 AS FILE NO. 2020-7000406 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

APN 490-402-72-00

Page 309 of 366 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY

PRESERVATION AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNERS OF THE HISTORIC

LANDMARK KNOWN AS THE STANLEY AND VIRGINIA SCOTT HOUSE
LOCATED AT 9190 BRIER ROAD, APN 490-402-72-00
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Bryan and Catherine Binotti, owners of the property located at 9190 Brier Road, APN 490-402-72-00 in the R1S-BT (Suburban Residential/Brier Tract Overlay) zone, wish to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of their historic property by entering into an Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement authorized under the Mills Act with the City;
WHEREAS, properties listed on the City of La Mesa Historic Landmarks Registry are eligible, by Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement, for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, also known as the Mills Act;
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the City Council of the City of La Mesa adopted Resolution No. 2022-XX designating the Stanley and Virginia Scott House located at 9190 Brier Road as a historic landmark; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on October 11, 2022, considered a staff report, and accepted public testimony in considering the request for a Historic Landmark Property Preservation agreement.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. That the project complies with California Government Code Sections 50280 et seq. as set forth in the Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

Page 310 of 366 ends

2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City that certain Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement with Bryan and Catherine Binotti, owners of the Historic Landmark known as the Stanley and Virginia Scott House located at 9190 Brier Road, to be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk, subject to the following improvement schedule that shall be placed in a timeline as an attachment to the agreement:
a. Replace cedar shake roofing with shake-like tile, similar in size and texture to the existing shakes (by 2023).
b. Repair broken brick mortar from wear/sprinklers in front yard and around the pool (by 2023).
c. Repair broken brickwork throughout landscaping (by 2023). d. Replace all rotten/falling fencing street-side with like-kind 2x4 white fencing (by 2023).
e. Repair and replace deteriorated board and batten siding in-kind as needed (by 2025).
f. Maintain original craftsman woodwork including: built-in closets, doors, and unpainted cedar paneling in main living spaces (ongoing). g. Maintain mature citrus and eucalyptus trees that are important to area history.

Replace aging citrus trees with new citrus as needed (ongoing).

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 11th day of October, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 311 of 366 ends

Page 312 of 366 ends

Page 313 of 366 ends

Page 314 of 366 ends

Page 315 of 366 ends

Page 316 of 366 ends

Page 317 of 366 ends

3525 Seventh Avenue • San Diego CA 92103 • www.SOHOsandiego.org • 619/297-9327 Tuesday, March 1, 2022
La Mesa Historic Preservation Commission
La Mesa City Hall
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
Re: March 1st agenda, Item 5.2 - 9190 Brier Road
Commissioners,
Save Our Heritage Organisation (SOHO) supports a historic designation nomination report being submitted for 9190 Brier Road, the Stanley and Virginia Scott house. Potentially significant under Criteria B and C, this resource is associated with Stanley Scott, a notable builder and developer during the post-war period within the San Diego region, and appears to be a good example of the Custom Ranch style.

Stanley Scott was a partner in Jackson and Scott Builders, who contributed to San Diego housing development in the post WWII period, and personally contributed to several San Diego organizations. Notable tracts located across the county include Del Cerro, Pamela Park in South Park, Woodland Terrace in Point Loma, Farms Club Estates in La Jolla and Oak Park. Further, Jackson and Scott Builders worked with Master Architect Lloyd Ruocco during the 1940s. Stanley Scott also contributed to the community as a member of various San Diego organizations including the Building Industry Association of San Diego County, the Construction Industry Federation, and the Construction Industry Advancement Fund as well as the California Building Industry Association. These contributions and achievements demonstrate his potential historical significance under Criterion B and should be included and analyzed within a historic designation nomination report.

In addition, renderings of the building’s exterior demonstrate the original design appears to be intact and reflect the Custom Ranch style. Notable features include the single-story horizontal massing oriented to the street, a lowpitch gable roof clad in wood shingles with deep overhangs, brick and vertical wood siding exterior, large brick chimney, attached garage, and a high level of craftsmanship. These character defining features illustrate this resource is a good candidate for designation under Criterion C and further supports the preparation of a designation report.

SOHO recommends a historic designation report be prepared for 9190 Brier Road and reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission, which appears significant under multiple criteria.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment,
Amie Hayes
Senior Historic Resources Specialist

Page 318 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 1
Historic Site Designation Report
March2022
Stanley and Virginia Scott House
Prepared for/by: Bryan and Catherine Binotti, Property Owners 9190 Brier Road, La Mesa, CA 91942
Submitted to: La Mesa City Planning

Page 319 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. HISTORICAL LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
III. HISTORICAL CONTEXT
a. GROSSMONT-BRIER COMMUNITY
b. MID-CENTURY ARCHITECTURE
c. REGISTERED DESIGNER
d. JACKSON-SCOTTCONSTRUCTION
i. Early years
ii. Construction period
iii. Stanley Scott’sProfessional Achievements
IV. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
a. STANLEY AND VIRGINIA SCOTT
b. PAUL WOLCOTT JR.
c. RICHARD GAUSTI
d. LAVERNE AND MARGARET JOHNSON
V. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE
a. WEST ELEVATION (Main Façade)
b. EAST ELEVATION (Rear façade)
c. NORTH ELEVATION
d. SOUTH ELEVATION
e. INTERIOR
f. INTENTION/CONCLUSION
VI. CITATIONS
VII. APPENDIX
a. APPENDIX A: BUILDING DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
i. Original Sketches and Blueprints
ii. Residential Description
iii. Construction/Building Permits
b. APPENDIX B: MAPS AND HISTORY
i. 1912 Division Map
ii. 2022 Current map
iii. Newspaper Clippings
c. APPENDIX C: OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
i. Obituaries
d. APPENDIX D: PHOTOS

Page 320 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942
3

Page 321 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942
4

Page 322 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942
5

Page 323 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942
6

Page 324 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 7
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This Historic Site Designation report has been preparedfor the Scott house, located at 9190 Brier Rd, in the Brier tract of LaMesanorthwest of Mt. Helix, by and for the developer Stanley Scott and his family. Stanley Scott was a partner in Jackson & Scott builders-prolific builders in the East San Diego County during the post WWII development boom. This property is identified as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No.490-402-72-00 on Map 1475. The custom ranch residence is a 4 bedroom, 3 bathroom single family 2563 sq ft residence, on 1.31acre. This report was prepared by property owners Bryan and Catherine Binotti in order to support a designation request to the La Mesa City Historic Board.

The aforementioned property owners are seeking La Mesa historical designation in order to enter into a Mills Act Property Abatement contract.

Designed for property owners Stanley and Virginia Scottin 1949,the Scott family resided there from 1950-1962. Tucked into a grove of mature eucalyptus behind a small orchard of orange trees sits aranchstylehome boasting a cedarshake roof and weeping whitebrick. The 9190Brier Dr.dwelling retains a high degree of integrity, maintained meticulouslysuch that the dwelling’sappearance has not been significantlychanged from the originaldesign and construction. The home embodies the mid-centuryappeal in interior and exterior work with great individual traits of a classic custom ranch residence. Built during 1950 it exemplifies the shift in modern construction to cater to the family needs and interests.

Great skill and detail exhibited by Jackson &Scott Builders Incwent intothe home.

The home is historically and architecturally significant for its reflection of Mid-century construction that characterized the La Mesa community in the post WWII development period, masterful craftsmanship, as well as the impact of original owner Stanley Scott to the growth and development of La Mesa and the surrounding community during the peak of his career. The exterior and interior of the dwelling,as well as the garage,are all contributing elements to theproperty’s significance. Contributory elements of the interior include: vaulted open beam ceiling of the entryway, main living room, and front den. Interior elements also include wood parquet wood flooring, exposed red brick fireplace shared between the living room and kitchen, andclear unpainted cedar panelingin the living room. Rear exterior contributory elements include the mid-century oval shaped pool,and brick colored edging, as well as basket-weave brickwork on the patio.

The years of residence for the Scott family in their custom built home was a peak building period for Jackson-Scott, with the business office located locally in La Mesa. With high community involvement, and small desks and shelving throughout the home, it is only assumed that work was often brought into the Scott home in a social and professional capacity. 9190 Brier Road is found to meet criteria B and D due to the association with builder Stanley Scott. Criteria C and F are met due to the exceptional nature of the integrityof the home remaining true to its distinctive design, style, and craftsmanship. According to the City of La Mesa Code of Ordinances 25.03.010 -Historic landmark and historic district designation criteria: a cultural resource may be recommended for designation as a landmark or historic district, ifit meets one ofmore of the following criteria.

A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; or
B. It isidentified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; or C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or

Page 325 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 8
D. It is representative of the notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect; or E. It is identified with a person or persons or groups who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City; or
F. It embodies elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship; or G. It is an archeological or paleontological site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value; H. It is a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of sites, buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collectivevalue of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement.

III. HISTORICAL CONTEXT:
a. GROSSMONT-BRIER COMMUNITY
Brier Tract is found in the community of La Mesa, incorporated in 1912. (21)The Brier tract was mapped and subdivided in 1912 per map shown in Appendix B. Land was bought and subdivided in the early 1900’s but was not developed until laws and fundsmade construction available once againfollowing WWII. A La Mesa Scout article, datedJune 22, 1950 mentions “33 county roads are now named” Brier Lane beingamong the newly named roads. La Mesa was annexed into San Diego in 1951. Today the tract has been subdividedmultiple times,the original Scott home sittingon one of the largest remaining lots of the tractat 1.31acre. The La Mesa 1953-1954 Directory shows 6 addresses listed on Brier Rd (also documented as Lane). Brier tract is tucked away immediately north of 8 freeway, andlooks westward over the 125 freewayand northward over Fletcher Hills.

The Brier tract was part of the land utilized to carry water to greater San Diego from the Cuyamaca Mountains, with the historical flume defining the northern property line of 9190 Brier Road. San Diego was outgrowing its dependence on well water and in 1872 San Diego’s first water company was organized, incorporated January 20, 1873. The next water development hurtle in San Diego was the San Diego Flume Company who sought to irrigate the rich valley of El Cajon and bring water to San Diego. Many barriersstoodin their way along the road including financial, man-power, and political boundaries. “Construction began in May, 1886, on Cuyamaca Dam and a wooden flume 35 miles long to bring water to San Diego. The Los Coches Trestle was the highest of all the trestles supporting the San Diego Flume. The flume was completed in 1888.” The flume traveledfromthe San Diego River a short distance below the mouth of Boulder Creek and ends at a reservoiron the side of Cuyamaca Mountain with a capacity of nearly 4,000,000,000 gallons. (20)
This influx of water allowed the land to sustain more development and expand to include agriculture and citrus orchards with packing warehouses as well as health resorts and limited film production facilities at the turn into the twentieth century. (21) Further development in the Brier tract area is described in Historian Jim Newland’s article in the winterspring 2021 edition of Lookout Avenue. The 125 North extension,in addition to the 8 interchange,caused original southern lots in Brier Tract to be removed by CalTrans. Nearby Murray drive and Nokomisstreet arewhere the SL/Grossmont Movie Studio once sat.

Page 326 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 9
Marvin Jackson, of Jackson & Scott Builders Inc, served as President on the board of directorsof Grossmont Community hospital(14). He was a leading visionary for the Grossmont hospital which became a reality with a groundbreaking ceremony in April 1954. A dedication ceremony was held in July 1955 in which Jackson said to the audience “This is your hospital. It was your work and money which made this day possible” (14). Scott’s home and the subject of this designation is less than a mile from Grossmont hospital. Jackson and Scott were prominent and successful San Diegans in the building industry and East county community leadership roles. b. MID-CENTURY ARCHITECTURE
Mid-centurymodern architecture was birthed with Irving Gill and Rudolf Schindler being credited as pioneers in San Diego modernismat the beginning of the twentieth century. They brought an architecture of simplicity,valuingfunction overform. Their contributions were valued considerably more after their careers had ended by others that followed in their footsteps.

Post WWII housing demand brought great opportunities for the building industry. Previously whenland was sold to individuals the land was provided with utilities and infrastructure, and then an architect was hired to design a custom home. The housing act of 1949 made it beneficial for developers to build tract homes, therefore cutting out the need for thehomeowner to seek architectural services. Jackson-Scott is listed as aprominent builder of Rolando, Oak Park, Pt.

Loma, and Del Cerro as shown in the table in appx Bfrom the San Diego Modernism Context Statement. (18) Architectural styles of the mid-centuryvaried, with modernism not fully emerging until the post-war bust of prosperity and construction. Modernist styles areall noted tohave a forward lookingattitude, utilizingnew materials and techniques, expansive glass, integration of indoor-outdoor spaces, functional floor plans, and easy maintenance features. Sub-styles within modernism do not share a uniformdesign motif. According to San DiegoModernism Historic Context Statement sub-stylesin San Diego include • Streamline Moderne
• Minimal traditional
• International
• Futurist-Googie
• Tiki-Polynesian
• Post and Beam
• Tract Ranch
• Custom ranch
• Contemporary
• Brutalisms
• Organic Geometric
• Organic Free-form
The mass production of the1940s gave way to the 1950s which broughtmore varietyof styles such as tract ranch, splitlevel, and contemporary. The rise in the economy paralleled the designof homes, most boasting a two car garage

Page 327 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 10
visually oriented towards the street. Tract Ranch was the most prominent style, largely popularized by Cliff May in the Los Angelesarea and the publication “Western Ranch Houses by Cliff May” by Sunset Magazine in 1958.(18) Mid Centuryarchitecture was molded by the changes to thelifestyle of familiesin the post-WWII era. Technology was rapidly changingwhile automobileswere becoming more common. Modern Residential Architecture focused on the needs and interests of the residents,leading to a wide range of variability in building materials, form, and appearance.

The garage became a crucialpart of the home.Between 1945 and 1955, the number of cars on the road doubled, with around 70 percent of families owning an automobile by 1958 in comparison to the 20 percent at the beginning of the decade. This allowed greater expansive development away from the city. (18) Due to the Great depression, WWII, and interestin developing the fringes of the city surrounding shopping centers, thedowntownSan Diegoarea remained stagnant. By the late 1950s no significant building has been constructed in the downtown area in nearly thirty years.

Organizations were developed and money was funneled to rehabilitate downtown. New life was breathedinto the downtown areathrough city initiatives, including building a new city hall, convention center and auditorium, and Civic Theater designed by Lloyd Ruocco which opened in 1965. Clean simple design was utilizedas seen in the Civiccenter, reflectingthe budget of the time, as well as the growth of modernism seen in commercial buildings. The 1960’s also welcomed a new sports arena in Mission Valley as well as large research companies and intellectual pursuits such as UCSD and Salk research institute, driven by the cold war’s need for higher education as a driving political force.

San Diegoattractedlarge numbers of architects such as Lloyd Ruocco, Cliff May, John Mortenson, John Lloyd Wright, and Homer Delawie. Outdoor living in San Diego was emphasized with redwood paneling and large glass windows in efforts to bringthe outdoors to blend seamlessly with the indoors. Adaptation of house and lot to man, elimination of the sense of confinement while integrating and valuingviews, materials and structure.

Modernism evolved to the tract ranch as a prominent style home from 1950-1970 and the suburban areas grew rapidly.

Primary characteristicsinclude horizontalmassing, single story, and low sloped gabled or hippedroofs with deep overhangs. Roofs were generallyfinished with wood shingles and wall materials included horizontal wood siding, wood board and batten, stone, and brick. Details such as wood shutters, wide brick or stone chimneys, and wood windows were commonly included. (18)
Custom Ranch homes were builtwith specific clients inmind and were popularized by San Diego Designers such as Cliff May, Richard Wheeler, CJ Paderewski, and Weir Brothers Construction. Cliff May became a ranch style icon due tohis book and articles published in Sunset Magazine.

Custom Ranch homes followed the same characteristics as ranch tract homes but often were much more lavish including deep street setbacks, expansive yard landscaping, “larger garages, motor courts, servant’s quarters, expanded kitchens, and generousliving spaces”. (18)Materialsparallel their Ranch tract counterparts with detailing including “paneled wood doors, divided lite windows, wood shutters, and prominent chimneys. Custom ranch oftenhave sprawling floor plans in an “L” or “U” shape surrounding a central courtyard,large attached garages, and expensive building materials with more generous materials and craftsmanship. Due to the custom build of many of these homes, vast individualizationsresulted in efforts to the meet the client’s needs and preferences.

Page 328 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 11
c. REGISTERED DESIGNER
No architect or designer was uncovered through research done on 9190 Brier Rd. It is assumed that as a proficient builder with expansive exposure to various styles, that Scott had his home built with his favorite aspects of multiple designers. The natural landscape of hills and valleys, with large boulders, and panoramic views in east county lent itself to the mid-century modern California architecture.

Although not documented on the original drawings for the home, multiple known architects have been tied to the Scott name through his business. Llyoyd Ruocco has been credited with designing business partner Marvin Jackson’shome at 4421 Mayapan Drivein 1949. John Nelson Mortenson, although never an accredited architect,was tied to multiple homes in the Mt. Helix area for his “Mortenson house” design approach. He worked for Jackson and Scott at the beginning of his career, for seven years until 1958. (2)
d. JACKSON-SCOTT CONSTRUCTION
i. Early years:

Richard Marvin Jackson, also known asR. Marvin Jackson, andStanley Scott formed abuilding partnership in 1945.

Jackson was originally from Oklahoma, and moved to San Diego as a young man with his family where they lived in the North Park neighborhood. He also studied architecture at San Diego State College, similar to Stanley Scott. Jackson married Helen Elizabeth Bates of Reno, Nevada. The 1937 San Diego City Directory shows Jacksonas a partner with the now established Master Builder Carl B. Hayes before partnering with Scottin 1945.Jackson and Hayesremained partnered untilthe early 1940s and worked primarily in the North park region. (6) Marvin Jackson had an office in North Park from his brief time as an independent builder between working with Carl B.

Hayes and partnering with Stanley Scott. Out of this office in North Park Jackson & Scott were able to capitalize greatly on the post war construction boom. Demand for new homes soared with lifted Federal building restrictions following the end of the war in 1945. Promotions and newspaper advertisements are seen prominentlydisplayed in the San Diego Union(SDU)Newspaper and other advertisement materialsas seen in Appendix D.

According to the Chamber of Commerce’s 1945 Industrial and Commercial Survey, the labor force of the city increased 62%;from 88,140 in 1940 to 142,590 in 1944 (18). This massive growth led to large growing pains in housing, transportation, and schools. Between 1940 and 1943 San Diego managed to increase the housing supply by more than thirty percent to mitigate the enormous need for defense housing. This was largely in part to the Lanham Act, 150 million dollars for the development of housing in defense industry centers, but stipulated that all war housing units had to be either sold or demolished immediately after the war. The 1940 census measured San Diego’s population at 203,341 in 1940, and by 1950 the population increased to 334,387.(18) Post WWII housing demand broughtgreat opportunities for the building industry, further spurred by The Housing act of 1949. Jackson-Scott Builders arelisted as aprominent builder of Rolando, Oak Park, Pt. Loma, and Del Cerro as shown in the table in appendix B below from the San Diego Modernism Context Statement.

Page 329 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 12
ii. Construction period
A fewnoteworthy builds of Jackson and Scott includethe Jackson residence designed by modern contemporary master architect LloydRuocco, a Loma Portal Colonial Revival style home for baseball Padre player John “Swede” Jensen (appendix B), and an “All electric house” with all appliances powered by electricity for Mr. and Mrs. Robert Redfield in El Cajon. Other builds include several subdivisions throughout San Diego including DelCerro, Pamela park subdivision in South park, Woodland Terrace subdivision in Point Loma, and Oak park in SE San Diego.(appendix B) Del Cerro, at 675 acres,was the biggestundertaking of Jackson-Scott as they were responsiblefor a great portion of the development of that area, approximately 1500 homes. Inthe mid 1950’s Jackson-Scott also purchasedover 100 acres of the William H.

Black estate in La Jolla which was subdivided into the La Jolla Farms Club Estates. A fewJackson-Scott homes have been historically designated including thehome of Ben and Ruth Rubin, as well as the Marvin Jackson residence.

Jackson-Scott are not considered master builders at this time with the information known. (6) The 1949 Housing Act called for “a decent home and suitable living environment for every American family”. (18) Advertisements around the city began to emphasize family values and upward status mobilitysuch as the ad in appendix B; encouraginghomebuyersto “Move up to Del Cerro” which was a “Real family center…a kind of living that has been planned…for a family like yours.” (18) Around 50% of homes were being bought on VA or FHA loans. Anadvertisement depicts a woman hugging a man holding a luggage pricetag stating“Wasn’t this the reason you married him” seen inthe 1953 SDUAdvertisementfor Del Cerro.

Just a segmented search betweenyears of 1949 to 1953 offer dozens of hits on Jackson & Scott Inc throughoutSan Diego.

Advertisements include 2-3 bedroom homes in La Mesa selling for between 10,900-13,400$, 2-3 bedroomnear 54thSt. and University Ave. for 7850-8750$, and Ridge View developmentlocated up on a high Mesa at Fairmont andHome avenues. See appendix B for newspaper clippings.

The Mr.and Mrs.Ben Rubin home in Mission Hills, currently historically designated today, was described in the SDU 6/19/1949 with multiple photos. Louvredoors are noted in the photo seen in the article, mirroring louvre doors seen in the Stanley Scott home.

Building permits were found for the Rolando areas and North park. Point Loma also boasted 2-3 bedroom homes that Ruocco may have assisted in. Ruocco and Jackson-Scott also worked together on many custom homes in the Grossmont-Helix area.

Arnold Dahl realtors’ advertised Jackson-Scott2-3 bedroom homes in the Sweetwater Springs Knolls as having “lots of redwood, steel casement windows, plumbing roughed in for garbage disposal and water softener. All are large quarter acre or more view lots. In picturesque Sweetwater Knolls, climatically perfect (according to government tests); 3 miles east of La Mesa. See them soon, they sparkle, they’re selling just: $14,000 to $19,000. FHA terms. Hurry!” The La Mesa Scout January 1953 announces a new commercial office for Jackson and Scott Inc on El Cajon Boulevard at FuerteDrive, making use of stone and floor–length windows. Both Jackson and Scottlived in La Mesa at this time, the office reflecting“their faith in the continuing growth and demand for homes. The firm employsa staff of4 including an architect and engineer.”
iii. Stanley Scott Professional Achievements

Page 330 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 13
Jackson and Scott Builders was establishedin 1945. (9) They soon became a prolific San Diego home and community builder. According to Stanley C. Scott’s profile on the website of the California Homebuilding Foundation, Stanley Scott “became President of Jackson & Scott, Inc. Builders and Developers. The corporation was responsible for the development of some 20 subdivisions within San Diego County, including more than 3,000 homes. The firm also built commercial structures and schools.”(9)(San Diego Union Tribune, January 11, 1993).

Stanley Scott was involved in a board capacity on multiple building organizations throughout San Diego including president/Executive Vice President of the Building Industry Association of San Diego County of which he was involved with for over 30 years leading to a lifetime honorary member. Also, as Executive Director of the Construction Industry Federation, Scott directly impacted legislation activity for San Diego’s building industry. Scott also served as executive director of the Construction Industry Advancement Fund.(9) On a state level Stanley Scott proved to add great value to his industry. He was a Lifetime Director of the California Building Industry Association (CBIA). (9) CBIA claims “In 2018 CBIA was proud to celebrate 75 years of industry advocacy, progress and milestones. Since 1943, CBIA has become one of the strongest voices in the building industry in California, growing to 9 regional affiliate offices complete with legislative, technical, communications and membership departments.” (10)
Throughout its history CBIA boasts landmarks such as:
• 1978 California homebuilding foundation (CHF) is founded and has now awarded 3.5 million to student and grants supporting home-building in California.
• 1990 CBIA spearheads the creation of California Schools Facilities program • 2016 CBIA wins Prop 51 a 9$ billion statewide school bond initiative among other achievements for the building industry.(10)
As president of CBIA in 1959, Scott helped found and launch the Pacific Coast Builders Conference (PCBC) in San Francisco(9) which continues to bring industry professions together yearly for the PCBC conference. He sat as the president of PCBS the following year 1960 and was awarded the prestigious Rodney Radom Award for his efforts.(9) It was thisRodney Radom award for being named the California builder of the year in 1974 that Scott was the most proud of according to an interview (1982 Union Tribune6).

The conference is “dedicated to advancing the art, science and business of housing, PCBC is the largest homebuilding tradeshow representing the west coast region. In our 60+ year history, we've grown from a small educational conference at San Francisco's Sheraton Palace Hotel to apowerful, annual business exchange of 10,000+ industry professionals withindustry-leading education, products, and networking.”(11) According to the SDUOct 3, 1982 (6) Scott helped it become one of the post powerful voice of the building industry in the 11 western states and the second largest builder’s conventions in the nation. (6)
San Diego Blood bank historical timeline identified September 11, 1950 as the day SDBB was established by a “group of community leaders who recognized the importance of a local blood bank” (13). In 1954 San Diego Blood bank began their proud partnership with Sharp healthcare system as their blood supplier, a partnership that is still going strong today. (13) Interestingly, Marvin Jackson was on the board of directors for Grossmont hospital from 1952-1965. San Diego Blood bank, of whichStanley Scott was president at some point, joined forces with Sharp in 1954. A dedication ceremony was

Page 331 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 14
held in July 1955 in which board president Marvin Jackson said to the audience “This is your hospital. It was your work and money which made this daypossible” (14). Scott’s home and the subject of this designation is less than a mile from Grossmont hospital. Jackson and Scott were prominent and successful San Diegans in the building industry and East county community leadership roles.

Stanley Scott retired in 1982 but the impacts of his work continue to grow through the organizations and people he helped to strengthen and bring together. In 1986 Scott was inducted into the California Business Industry hall of Fame (12), and a write-up is found on California Homebuilders Foundation naming hima 1986 Honoree. (9) IV. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
a. STANLEY AND VIRGINIA SCOTT
Stanley Crawford Scott was born on June 9, 1913. His father’s name was Sydney Scott, who emigratedfrom Belfast Ireland to San Francisco in 1905 to work in the construction industry. (SDU, Oct 13, 1950) His mother, Ethel Christie Sturtevant, a Kansas native, met his father in San Francisco and then moved in 1911 to San Diego. According to the 1920 Census, Stanley had one older brother and lived with his parents in the Normal Heights neighborhood where his father had a long career as a building contractor and his mother was an interior decorator. (6) Stanley Scott learned the business from the ground up by working with his father.

Stanley Scott built and presumably designed 9190 Brier, living there with his family from construction in 1950 to 1962. The La Mesa City Directory shows the Scott family taking up residence previously at 8414 Porter Hill Terrace in La Mesa. The original permit for the home was published in SDU March 16, 1950 “Stanley Scott, res and gar, per Jackson & Scott, Brier, Mount Helix, $18,500”. For reference, most tract homes would have been around $10,000 during 1950.

Scottgraduated Francis Parker School in 1929 and went on to attend San Diego State College (now San Diego State University) with a pursuit of architecture. The Great Depression forced Scott into quitting college and going to work for his dad, becoming known as “Mr. Builder of San Diego” by his colleagues. He also spent a few years employed at Dixieline Lumber Company. The 1940’s brought exciting changes in Scott’s life as he paired with Marvin Jackson to form Jackson and Scott Construction and develop some 20 subdivisions, the largest being the 675 acre community of Del Cerro. (12) Scott married his wife Virginia Kerr, also a native San Diegan in 1936 and had two children Stuart and Karen. (6). The SDU 10/1/1961 notes the wedding details of Karen Ann Scott to Donald Hamlin. A picture of Karen is seen in her family home in appendix C.

Outside of his professional achievementsScott was integrated into his San Diego community as a long-time member of both the La Mesa Lions Club and the San Diego yacht Club. (12) An October 3rd, 1982 SDUarticle (appendix B) has a picture of StanleyScott relaxing aboard his 36 foottroller named Virginia as he tells his son Stuart about how the housing industry has evolved yet remains the same, “rough”, after his 50 years in the housing industry building 2500 houses and commercial buildings.

Page 332 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 15
Both Mr. and Mrs.Scott were very involved with their community according to the La Mesa Scout (LMS) and the San Diego Union(SDU). Newspaperarticles mention Mrs. Scott assisting in local plays and social gatherings. Mr.Scott was on the board of directors for the La Mesa Kiwanis club in 1950, and was responsible forthe brick work for Wa-di-ta-ka La Mesa Boy Scout memorial camp. Mr.and Mrs. Scott also sponsored a youth fellowship retreatfor the La Mesa Methodist church according to the La Mesa Scout October 5th, 1950. The Scott home was a destination for neighborhood holiday parties and gift exchanges.

Original owners Stanley and Virginia Scottwere acquaintances of Leonard M. Smith realtor and Associates “La Mesa’s longest established real estate business serving Mt. Helix and east county since 1949”. Daughter of Mr. Leonard Smith, Jill Smith was involved in the sale of 9190 Brier and recalls growing up swimming in the poolat the Scott residence.

Scott died at Alvarado Convalescent Hospital on January 9, 1993 according to the SDUTribune January 11, 1993. (6) b. PAUL WOLCOTT JR.

The SDUDirectory lists the secondowner, Paul Wolcott Jr., seen in 1963 through 1967 after a purchase price of 55,000$.

Paul Wolcott Jr. was in the businessofinsurance, an ad in the SDUfrom 4/18/1949 advertisesfor “ The Wolcott Company” General Insurance Management on 3653 Voltaire St San Diego. Mr.Wolcott was also the San Diego State Director at the time, in charge of the education breakfast panel in LA discussing educational insurance training according to the paper.

SDU 2/6/1952 notes that Wolcott merged withthe firm of Barney &Barney-San Diego’slargest insurance agency. Hitting great achievementsat an early age of 35, Wolcottbecame head of the California Association of Insurance agents in late 1954. Mrs.Wolcott made a newspaper appearancein the SDUin 1964as a noted guest of the autumn fashion show at Rancho Santa Fe Inn which annually attracts countrywide representation. The Wolcott’s did not remain at 9190 forvery long, seeking a smaller home in 1967 according to real estate records. (appendix D) c. RICHARD GAUSTI
Third owner, Richard Guasti, purchased the home for 70,000in 1967, where he resided until 1971. Described as a ruddy redhead Guasti was the vice president of merchandising for J. Jessop & Sons of San Diego since 1960. Gausti also did not live in the residence for very long, moving to Minneapolis to accept a position as Vice Presidentof Merchandising of Dayton Hudson jewelers.
d. LAVERNE AND MARGARET JOHNSON
Laverne and Margaret Johnson were the longest residents of this midcentury home, buying from Mr. Richard Gausti in 1971. LaverneJohnson was born in Alabama in 1925 and moved with his parents and two brothers to Taft, California in 1936. At 18 years old in 1943 Johnson joined the US Army Air Force where his plane was among the 461 B-29s summoned by President MacArthur to overfly the surrender signing on the USS Missouri in Tokyo Harbor. Demobilized in 1946, Johnson continuedhis education at Taft junior college, continuing on to receive his BA, MA, and PhD in psychologyfrom Stanford University
The Johnsons were a heavily community centered family. SDU 7/1/1978 noted David Michael Johnsonreceiving 8,000$ from the Boys Club of San Diego Scholarship for his pursuitof law at Harvard University.

Page 333 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 16
Mr. Johnson lived in his home at 9190 Brier for46 years, until his death in 2016. He is survived by his wife Margaret and three children. (15)The Johnsons were highly regarded by those who knew them as a staple of the neighborhood, with weekly Sunday volleyball games and get-togethers in theirhome, aswell as 4th of July neighborhood barbecue and potluck. They had a great love for the neighborhood and their home.

Johnson’s greatest professional success involved his pioneering contributions to the study of sleep. Coming from St.

Louis, Lavern Johnson moved to San Diego to join the new US Naval Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, now called the Naval Health Research Center. He retired from this group as the second Scientific Director after 26 years of service. (15)
Many recognitions and awards accompanied Johnson’s research including the Distinguished Civilian Service Award from the Secretary of the Navy in 1977, appointed a charter member of the US Senior Executive Service in 1979, and In 1993, his career achievements were honored by the Sleep Research Society (which he helped found) which named him its "Distinguished Scientist of the Year”. Johnson published over 128 scholarly articles in 45 journals, including Science and Nature, and contributed 28 chapters to books.(15) American Psychology association website notes Johnson’s publications attest to the importance of the value he placed onscientific research asa collaborative, team endeavor. As a clinical psychologiststudying sleep and its biological rhythms, his emphasis fell on the relation of sleep loss and recovery,and its correlation to human performance. This was particularly relevantto military serviceoperations and theirvariablework schedulesand sustained performance periods, which Johnson had experienced firsthand, as had many in San Diego’s military family. (16) As a scholar and researcher, Johnson was also involved with UCSD and SDSU.

V. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE
a. WEST ELEVATION (Main Façade)
Original drafts,shown in Appendix A, parallel the current condition of the home in regards tonearly every aspectof this sprawling one-story mid-century ranch home.

San Diego Modernism Context Statement states “Custom Ranch homes followed the same characteristics as ranch tract homes but often were much more lavish including deep street setbacks, expansive yard landscaping, “larger garages, motor courts, servant’s quarters, expanded kitchens, and generous living spaces”. (18) The front façade of the homehas a strong horizontal emphasisfacingdirectly into a circle driveway arching around a small grove of citrus trees. The home is on a curve on the dead end street of Brier Roadand lined with a whitewoodrail fence. The garage and main home are in line with one another, divided by a dutch door into a breezeway under a semiconnecting garage. This is another notable characteristicof the custom ranch. Board and batten garage doors seamlessly blend the garage with the rest of the body of the home. The asphalt circle driveway has an extensionto be used as a car port for additional parking.

The home is currently painteda custom “Johnson Green”—a light green with a darker shade of moss green for trim and shutters complimented by white crisp eaves. The wide sprawling home is a slight U shape centering on an outdoor east facing patio. The recessed front porch entry is met with awideolive-colored original wood door, withupper glass panes of bottled glass flanked by louvered wood sidelights.

Page 334 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 17
All windows are wood double hung,with simulated divided litefollowing the panel pattern from the original sketch.

Exterior siding is board and batten of 1x3, and 1x12 woodwork, and weeping brick painted white under the front and back areas covered by a wide hip roofand wide eaves for afront porch and rearpatio. The front porch walkway is red brick in a basket weave pattern. Exterior wood louvered shutters are found on all windows of the main homewith the exception of the garage and picture window of the front den. The exteriorand interior of the home utilizes high end custom details and materials for the Ranch design.

A prominentand wide brick chimney is seen protruding fromthe cedar shake roof. Original drawings also notate a cedar shake roof.

Photos in Appendix D from 1971 show landscaping of grass with a lamppost, and a few citrus planted near the road.

Today, areas once covered by grass have been retrofitted for drought tolerant native landscaping, yet the lamppost remains the same. The circle driveway surroundsan orange grove of 6 prolific mature trees, reminiscence of East County’shistory in citrus farming.
b. EAST ELEVATION (Rear façade)
The east elevation of the home is viewed through floor to ceiling glass looking over a swimming pool with north facing vistas ofFletcher Hills. The backside façade of the home mirrors the front with asprawling deep set roof with weeping mortar, and basket weavebrick patio. Unobstructed views to the north as well asopen land slopingdown the east portion of the property,allow for breezes and air to flow through the home from the double back doors to the air inlets flanking the extra-wide front dooron the west facade.

The east elevation, or the backyard, has an oval swimming pool and slide, with a detached pool house and covered cabana area. There is evidence of a previous diving board in the cement and in photos in appendix D.

The slight U shape of the home can be seen from the east elevation. The patio can be entered by a door from the master bedroom on the north,double door from the living room on the west of the patio, and a southern door from the dining room.

The east façade is the only angle with notable exteriorchangedeviating fromthe original sketchdesign. An open pergola off of the master bedroomhasbeen added, and the rear patio has been enclosed to create a sunroom. In doing so, there was no removal or alteration to the east facing brickworkon siding or patio. c. NORTH ELEVATION
The north elevation is not viewable from the street, and is comprisedof threebedroomsand two bathroom double hung wood windows, as well asthe board and batten siding pattern.

The north end of the property has abrick lined walkway separating a pathway from planter beds against the house.

Further north of thewalkway is maintained, but undeveloped land with many mature eucalyptusand remnants of a previously used sand volleyball court.
d. SOUTH ELEVATION

Page 335 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 18
The south elevationis primarily composed of the three car garage,a reminderof the change in family life and mobility withincreasedaccess to the automobile in the 1950s. A three car garage allows ample room for automobilistsand storage. The single car garage has access from both the rear and front for privacy in the “shop” and accessibility. The rear of thegarage faces anopen courtyard area with a basketball hoop and the kitchen window accentuating family life.

These characteristics show the modernistic approach as homes were adapted to the enjoyment and convenience of the family residing in them and the natural elements around the property. e. INTERIOR
The low and wide ranch style exterior opens into a vaulted mid-century interior immediately upon entering through the front door. Vaulted open and unpainted beams are in the entryway, front den, and main great room. Clear tongue-ingroove cedar paneling is throughout the great room, with glass windows seen on the east side of the room. Along the western ceilinglights are hid to draw the eye upward to the great beams in the ceiling and beautiful craftsmanship of the room. This is also noted in the newspaper article as seen in appendix B. The easterly glass walls and glass doors blur the lines between interior and exterior, in mid-century style. The entire southern wall of the great room is quality red brick floor-to-ceiling with alarge-mouthfireplace below a mantle spanning the wall. The brickwork carriesthrough the shared wall intothe kitchen. Finish work, molding, and baseboards are all clean cut, without ornate detailing.

Heat source throughout the home is radiant heat under the oak parquet flooring,also reflected in the sales notice between owners in Appendix Aof the 1960s.

Louvered doors welcome guests from the wallpapered entryway into the great room, and stained wood doors are throughout the home, leading to the three north bedrooms and 2 bathrooms.

There was detailedattention made to storage, built in desks, cabinets, and linen closets, all of which do notappear to have been altered from their original condition. The third bathroom is near the kitchen off of the laundry room, or maid’s quarters. Choppingblocks and other amenities are seen in the room off of the kitchen which would have been utilized by hired help.
f. INTENTION/CONCLUSION
Refer to Appendixes for originalhouse plans, maps, and photos.

The property is found to have significance and integrity when evaluated accordingto the following definition by La Mesa Code of Ordinances 25.03.010 - Historic Landmark and Historic District Designation Criteria:

A cultural resource may be recommended for designation as a landmark or historic district, if it meets one ormore of the criteria outlined in the above Executive summary.
9190 Brier Road is found to meet criteria B and D due to the original homeowner and prolific builder Stanley Scott’s significant influence on La Mesa and the San Diego community at large. Criteria C and F are met due to the exceptional nature of the integrity of the home remaining true to its distinctive design, style, and craftsmanship. “In addition to determining the significance of a property under local, state, and national criteria, a property must also must possess integrity. Integrity is defined by the National Register of Historic Places as the ‘ability of a Property to

Page 336 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 19
conveyand maintain its significance.’ It is defined by the HRB Guidelines for the Application of Historical Resources Board Designation Criteria as “the authenticity of a historical resource’s pyhsical identity clearly indicated by the retention of characteristics that existed during the resource’s period of significance.” Further, integrity relates “to the presence or absence of historic materials and character defining features” of a resource. The local, state, and national registers recognize seven aspects ofintegrity—location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.”
Location:
9190 Brier Roadin the Brier tract faces southwest, with a northeast view over Fletcher Hills and a gentle easterly slope, all true to its original form. The building has remained in its original location throughout its existence. As such, the property retains its location element for integrity purposes. This property is identified as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No. 490-402-72-00on Map 1475. The custom ranch residence is a 4 bedroom, 3 bathroom single family 2563 sq ft residence, on 1.31acre. The property has at least one major acreage change in its history-2019 lot splitof 0.5 acre. There is evidence of multiple other boundary adjustments due tothe San Diego water flume, SDGE easement, and neighbor boundary adjustments. The location has excellent integrity of location.

Design:
9190 Brier Road is a custom ranch home built with wood siding, brick with weeping mortar, clear wood paneling, large glasswindows, expansive car amenities and landscaping, as well a prominent brick chimney and generous front yard with circle driveway to a three car garage. Although the rearaddition of the enclosed sunroom does affect the home originalarchitectural design, the rear addition doesnot greatly impact the main defining character elements of the home. The design element of the home is an excellentdisplayof custom ranch design.

Setting:

The setting is custom homes with a natural semi-rural feel in a suburban environmentdue to large mature trees and winding roads. The setting may have been altered due to infill homes adjusting the rural magnitudeof the lots. The house has good integrity of setting.

Materials:

Original inspection reports for the home parallel the current condition of the home in regards to the nearly every aspect.

Windows are wood double hung, heat source is radiant heat covered by wood parquetflooring, exposed brickwork is boasted throughout the great room fireplace and kitchen,and pristine woodpaneling and tonguein groove ceiling and beams are in the main great room. Exterior shutters are found on all windows of the main home, except the garage and picture window of the front den. Exterior siding is board and batten of 1x3,and 1x12 woodwork, and weeping brick painted white under the front and back areas covered by a wide hip roof.

Expensive building materialswere used for the horizontal massing, thick cedar shakeshingle roofing, wood cabinetry, and extensivered brick. The materials are in excellent condition.

Page 337 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 20
Roofing has been replaced in the lifetime of the home, with high grade cedar shake roofing. Some materials are showing wear such as mortar between some bricks which will need repair, as well as maintaining integrity of wood siding, and roof replacement. Windows have been replaced with like kindin the lifetime of the home.

The interior of the home, specificallythe great roompaneling and brickwork,is in pristine condition. The kitchen has been remodeled in the 1990s and bathrooms have been updated. The overall materialsaspect of integrityis excellent.

Workmanship:

Workmanship in the home in incomparable. Being built by a builder for his family, great care was clearly taken for longevity and quality of the building materials themselves and the quality of workmanship. There was great attention to detail with storage, built in desks, cabinets, and linen closets, all of which do not appear to havebeen altered from their original condition. The laid brickwork, both interior and exterior, show a high degree of finish and quality workmanship.

Feeling:

The feeling of the property is true to the mid-centuryaesthetics as well as cultural changes as discussed previously in this designation research. These include the garage near the front of the home, as well as the main room for TV and other family entertainment at the back of the house-common shifts of the era.

A grove of 6 citrus trees in the front yardreminisce of the history of citrus growing in the region. The feeling aspect of integrity is excellent.

Association:

Specific association to the Scott Family and Jackson & Scott Builders Inc allowed for extensive customization and craftsmanship. The weight of the association is further discussed in the history and achievement of the previous owners in the above portions. The association aspect of integrity is excellent.

This Historic Site Designation report has been prepared for the Scott house, located at 9190 Brier Rd, in the Brier tract of La Mesa Tract northwest of Mt. Helix by and for the developer Stanley Scott and his family. Thishigh-end custom residential home maintains its high level of integrity through preservation of all the essential features that relay the character and appearance of the home in the mid-century era.(18) The original condition of the home has been preserved exceptionallywell with replacements of like-kind materials on the exterior and interior portions of the home.

The owners Bryan and Catherine Binotti are seeking designation due to a highdegree of integrity as well as association with a significant builder to the city of La Mesa and surrounding area. They intend to identifyand respect the historic architectural character of the home. Inconclusion, the Stanley and Virginia Scott house meets the location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, and feeling aspects of architectural integrity. The house is an excellent example of a custom ranch true to its original character, with association with important characters to the city of San Diego.

Page 338 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 21
VI. CITATIONS
(1) http://www.sohosandiego.org/tourbooklets/2005sdmodernismweekend.pdf (2) https://www.modernsandiego.com/article/historically-designated-modern-buildings-in-san-diegocounty (3) https://patch.com/california/lamesa/history-gems-november-4-visionary-architects-homesfed296ee3af4 (4) https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/4421-Mayapan-Dr-La-Mesa-CA-91941/17036825_zpid/” (5) http://cityoflamesa.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_04082019-804 (6) http://sandiego.cfwebtools.com/images/files/06.pdf
(7) https://lamesahistory.com/history/
(8) Historical Nomination (cfwebtools.com)
(9) https://www.mychf.org/scott-stanley-c/
(10)https://cbia.org/75th-anniversary/

Page 339 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 22
(11) https://www.pcbc.com/pcbc/public/Content.aspx?ID=590&sortMenu=102000 (12)San Diego UnionTribune, January 11, 1993 image
(13)https://www.sandiegobloodbank.org/celebrating-70-years (14)http://www.grossmonthealthcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/GHD-Public-InformationBooklet-E-Version.pdf (15)Published in San Diego Union-Tribune on Nov. 13, 2016. (16)https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2017-29745-016
(17)https://www.lloydruocco.com/project-list-1
(18)http://www.sohosandiego.org/resources/SanDiegoModernismContext.pdf (19)Box ofarticles/documents with home
(20) https://sandiegohistory.org/archives/books/smythe/part4-4/ (21)https://www.cityoflamesa.us/DocumentCenter/View/6201/07LaMesaGPHistoricPreservationCD?bidId= (22)ldmhistorical.pdf (sandiego.gov)
(23)James Newland-Historian expertise
VIII. APPENDIX
a. APPENDIX A: BUILDING DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
i. Original Sketches and Blueprints

Page 340 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 23

Page 341 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 24

Page 342 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 25
ii. Residential description

Page 343 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 26

Page 344 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 27
iii. Construction/Building Permits

Page 345 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 28

Page 346 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 29
b. APPENDIX B: MAPS AND HISTORY
i. 1912 Division Map

Page 347 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 30
ii. 2022 Current map

Page 348 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 31
iii. Newspaper Clippings
San Diego Modernism Context Statement:

Page 349 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 32

Page 350 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 33

Page 351 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 34

Page 352 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 35

Page 353 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 36

Page 354 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 37
c. APPENDIX C: OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
i. Obituaries

Page 355 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 38

Page 356 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 39

Page 357 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 40

Page 358 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 41

Page 359 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 42
d. APPENDIX D: PHOTOS

Page 360 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 43

Page 361 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 44

Page 362 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 45

Page 363 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 46

Page 364 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 47
1971
Photos
1971
Photos

Page 365 of 366 ends

HISTORIC SITE DESIGNATION: SCOTT HOUSE
9190 BRIER ROAD, LA MESA, CA 91942 48

Page 366 of 366 ends

La Mesa City CouncilOctober 11, 2022

La Mesa City Council
October 11, 2022