LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting
Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:
Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Colin Parent
Councilmember Bill Baber
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Jack Shu
City Treasurer Eldon Vogt
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
In-Person/Virtual Hybrid City Council Meeting Pursuant to AB 361 (Government Code Section 54953(e)(1)-(2))
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.us), Facebook Live (www.facebook.com/lamesaca) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:
The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:
Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.
Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 500 words. eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 5:00 p.m., the Thursday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.
Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator, Rida Freeman, Director of Administrative Services, 48 hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].
Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo i.d. or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.
Pages
1. CALL TO ORDER
1.1. INVOCATION - VICE MAYOR PARENT
1.2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.
If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.
6. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 8.1 through 8.5)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
Recommended Motion:
Approve Consent Calendar Items 8.1 through 8.5.
8.1. APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
8.2. RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54953, AS AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 361, AND
RE-AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL AND/OR
HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES BEGINNING
NOVEMBER 1, 2022 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2022
1 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
8.3. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH
CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS, LLC FOR PUBLIC WORKS OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE
5 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
8.4. RESOLUTION AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030 (0.5) OF THE LA
MESA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO ALLISON AVENUE AS A THROUGH STREET;
26 INSTALLATION OF AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ON ALLISON
AVENUE AT ITS WESTERN INTERSECTION WITH PALM AVENUE
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
8.5. RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE CHEVROLET
BOLT EUV FOR BUILDING INSPECTION TO BOB STALL
CHEVROLET
55 Staff Reference: Mr. Kusiak
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
10. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
11. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
12. ADJOURNMENT
DATE: October 25, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, AS AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY
BILL 361, AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL
AND/OR HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF LA MESA FOR THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING
NOVEMBER 1, 2022 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2022
The City Council, Board and Commission meetings returned to in-person meetings on April 12, 2022. On February 22, 2022, it was the consensus of the Council to permit hybrid meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of La Mesa. A city may meet remotely or use a combination of in-person/virtual (hybrid) platform under AB 361 during a declared state of emergency by the Governor via Government Code § 54953(e) et seq. The attached Resolution (Attachment A) would need to be adopted by Council to allow for hybrid meetings, in which Councilmembers and/or Board and Commission Members may choose to continue to attend meetings virtually while still allowing the public to attend in-person.
On September 28, 2021, the City Council was apprised of the latest Assembly Bill No. 361 (AB 361) signed by Governor Newsom allowing legislative bodies to continue to utilize remote/virtual platforms for meetings as long as one of the following three criteria was met:
State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or
For the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or
The City Council has previously determined, by majority vote, that, as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
Based on the above criteria, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-115 to allow continued remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of
La Mesa for the month of October 2021 at its September 28, 2021 meeting.
Subsequently, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2021-129, 2021-153, 2022- 006, and 2022-018, to allow continued remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of La Mesa for the months of November and December 2021 and January, February, and March 2022. Similarly, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2022-020, 2022-028, 2022-042, 2022-063, 2022-083, 2022-087, and 2022-103 to allow hybrid meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of La Mesa for April, May, June, July, August, September, and October 2022.
To continue meeting based on the parameters set forth in AB 361, the City Council must adopt subsequent resolutions each month prior to the expiration date of the previously adopted resolutions requesting the same. The adoption of the proposed Resolution is required to allow the City’s legislative bodies to hold hybrid meetings in which Councilmembers, Board Members, and Commissioners may choose to continue to participate virtually. Staff recommends adopting the attached draft resolution this evening to allow the hybrid meeting option for the month of November.
Attachment: A. Draft Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, AS
AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 361, AND RE-AUTHORIZING THE
CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL AND/OR HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF LA MESA FOR THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING NOVEMBER 1, 2022 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2022
WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor issued Executive Order Nos. N-08-21, N-25-20 and N-29-20, which suspended certain provisions of the Ralph M.
Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to conduct public meetings without strict compliance with the teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act;
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 361, which was signed into law on September 16, 2021, amended Government Code section 54953, to provide relief from the teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act under certain circumstances provided the legislative body makes certain findings;
WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, in accordance with the section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act, and the state of emergency remains in effect; and WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the California Department of Health and County of San Diego Public Health Services continue to recommended measures to promote social distancing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:
1. That the Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the previously declared and existing state of emergency arising from the COVID-19 pandemic;
2. That the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members of the Council to meet safely in person, and further that local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing;
3. That the legislative bodies of the City may continue to conduct public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e); and
4. That the Council will reconsider the above findings within 30-days of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 25
th day of October 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 25, 2022
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing a Purchase Agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC for Public Works Operation
and Maintenance Software
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize a 38-month purchase agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC for $322,045?
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approves a resolution to authorize a three-year purchase agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC for $322,045.
Fiscal Impact:
Funds are available in the operating Accounts 3101-6486 and 4142-6486 and Reserve Fund 101-4899.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Continue to improve high quality municipal services
BACKGROUND:
Operation and maintenance software (OMS) allow the user to log in customer requests, issue work orders, track work and resources, schedule tasks, manage infrastructure assets, compile data to assist with enhancement of public works services, and streamline the operational budgets. OMS is a means of modernization of public works service and work. OMS is being used by many jurisdictions throughout the country and becoming a standard tool in the public works field.
In 2003, the City chose to purchase Cartegraph Navigator, an OMS for its operations and maintenance needs after extensive evaluation of available software at the time. In 2015, the City upgraded Cartegraph Navigator to Cartegraph OMS, which is assetPage 5 of 60 Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 25, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
based software with mobile capabilities. This version of the software allows maintenance crews to receive requests, create tasks and log the work performed and resources used in the field with use of tablet computers.
The Public Works Department has implemented Cartegraph for several divisions and is continuing to expand the software’s services and capabilities to other divisions.
Currently, external and internal requests are logged in Cartegraph for wastewater, streets, traffic, parks, and storm water divisions.
A recently added feature is the addition of the See-Click-Fix mobile app. The City receives maintenance and other requests through this app and can seamlessly incorporate the works order into Cartegraph. See-Click-Fix also allows the City to communicate with the requesters of the work.
Recently, Cartegraph Systems LLC was purchased by OpenGov Software Services.
The City of La Mesa Finance Department entered into an agreement with OpenGov for financial reporting and transparency purposes about 10 years ago. The City is expanding OpenGov services to budgeting, planning, citizen services, financials and procurement in the near future. Since the OpenGov contract will renew in December 2025 and OpenGov owns Cartegraph, there is a desire to align the two agreements. In order to achieve that, the staff has negotiated to extend the terms of the Cartegraph agreement to 14 months for the first renewal. The cost of the two additional months were prorated based on the monthly charges.
DISCUSSION:
Cartegraph, like many other software solutions, is on a subscription basis. Cartegraph Systems, LLC, has provided the City a 38-month purchase agreement starting in October 2022. The 38-month agreement will align with the future OpenGov software agreement renewals in December 2025.
This agreement commits a price structure to the City of La Mesa without any budgetary commitments for second and third years. The City Council has already approved the current fiscal year’s budget that includes sufficient funds to cover the first year of the agreement. The Cartegraph fee for the first 14 months is $115,340. The second and third year fees are $101,825 and $104,880 respectively, resulting to a total 38-month fee of $322,045.
The City’s Purchasing Officer may waive competitive bidding if the commodity being purchased is required to match or be compatible with equipment presently on hand, and the purchase is made from the supplier that supplied such other equipment, per La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070(a)(3). Purchasing Cartegraph software will keep
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 25, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
our OMS software consistent for both staff and the public. Under these facts, the circumstances are that Cartegraph Systems, LLC, can provide the same system as already used and, as such, staff recommends that it is in the best interests of the City to enter into a 38-month purchase agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC, for $322,045 without a formal bidding process.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the Council waive competitive bidding for the continued use of Cartegraph OMS software and authorize a purchase agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC, for $322,045.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ___________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne
City Manager Director of Public Works
______________________
Scott Munzenmaier Hamed Hashemian
Purchasing Officer Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A. Purchase Agreement
B. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION OF TH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS,
LLC FOR PUBLIC WORKS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE WHEREAS, the City’s strategic goal is to continue to improve high quality municipal services;
WHEREAS, the City’s Purchasing Officer may waive competitive bidding if the commodity being purchased is required to match or be compatible with equipment presently on hand, and the purchase is made from the supplier that supplied such other equipment, per La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070(a)(3);
WHEREAS, Purchasing Cartegraph software will maintain the continuity of City’s current Operation and Maintenance Software for both staff and the public; WHEREAS, The City’s purchasing Officer recommends that it is in the best interests of the City to enter into a 38-month purchase agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC; WHEREAS, OpenGov Software Services has purchased Cartegraph Systems LLC; WHEREAS, OpenGov is one the City’s vendors providing financial software services; WHEREAS, there is desire to align the renewal agreement of the Cartegraph services with the OpenGov;
WHEREAS, Cartegraph Systems LLC has proposed a 38-month Purchase Agreement with fixed pricing structure of $115,340 for 14-months to align the renewal dates of the two agreements, $101,825 and $104,880 for second and third years respectively; WHEREAS, the purchase of the software for the current fiscal year is part of the approved budget for current fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City is under no obligation to purchase the software for the second and third years, should the City Council decide not to approve the budget for this purchase.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.40.070 paragraph (a)(3) waives competitive bidding for the purchase of Cartegraph software.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the Purchase Agreement with Cartegraph Systems, LLC.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 25
th day of October 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
City of La Mesa
Cartegraph Solutions
Purchase Agreement
Purchase Agreement: PA-006224
Date Prepared: 10/11/2022
Date of Expiration: 11/30/2022
For any questions or assistance, please contact:
Mike Koenig
Sales Senior Account Manager
Phone: 918-625-2083
Mobile: +1 9186252083
Email: [email protected]
Cartegraph Systems LLC
3600 Digital Drive
Dubuque, IA 52003-8962
http://www.cartegraph.com
Toll Free: (800) 688-2656
Phone: (563) 556-8120
Fax: (563) 556-8149
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Purchase Agreement
Cartegraph Systems LLC is pleased to present this Purchase Agreement for the implementation of world class technology solutions. This Purchase Agreement is made and entered into between City of La Mesa (hereinafter referred to as "City of La Mesa", or "Customer") and Cartegraph Systems LLC (hereinafter referred to as Cartegraph).
In the case that any terms or conditions provided in the Cartegraph Solutions Agreement differ from, are provided in more detail by, or are made irrelevant by the terms and conditions provided in this Purchase Agreement, the terms in this Purchase Agreement shall control. For all terms and conditions not addressed by this Purchase Agreement, the Cartegraph Solutions Agreement shall control.
CUSTOMER ADDRESS: LICENSEE ADDRESS:
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Ave.
La Mesa, California
91942
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Ave
La Mesa, California
91942
The following Addendums are attached to the Purchase Agreement and are incorporated by reference:
ADDENDUM A - SOLUTIONS SUPPORT
ADDENDUM B - Not Used
ADDENDUM C - SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT can be found at www.cartegraph.com/solutions-agreement ADDENDUM D - Not Used
ADDENDUM E - CARTEGRAPH OMS EDITIONS
ADDENDUM F - Not Used
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Investment Summary
The following section describes Purchase Agreement line items for Customer's Solution. Based on the core needs that have been identified and understanding the organization's budgeting and funding cycle, Cartegraph is providing the following Solution configuration.
Term 01 - 9/30/2022 - 11/30/2023 -
Subscription
No. Product Code Quantity Price
1 OMS Plus OMSPLS 1 USD 56,935.00
2 OMS User OMSUSR 100 USD 28,000.00
3 Integration Toolkit (option) OMSAPI 1 USD 2,000.00
4 Asset Builder (option) OMSABD 1 USD 1,335.00
5 811 Integration 811NORINT 1 USD 5,835.00
6 SCF City 40,000 - 59,999 (includes 40 SCF users) SCC004 1 USD 21,235.00 7 Facilities Domain DOM001 1 USD 0.00
8 Signal Domain DOM006 1 USD 0.00
9 Parks & Recreation Domain DOM004 1 USD 0.00
10 Sanitary Sewer Domain DOM005 1 USD 0.00
11 Stormwater Domain DOM007 1 USD 0.00
12 Transportation Domain DOM008 1 USD 0.00
13 Walkability Domain DOM009 1 USD 0.00
14 Water Distribution Domain DOM010 1 USD 0.00
Term 01 - 9/30/2022 - 11/30/2023 - Subscription TOTAL: USD 115,340.00 Term 02 - 12/1/2023 - 11/30/2024 -
Subscription
No. Product Code Quantity Price
1 OMS Plus OMSPLS 1 USD 50,270.00
2 OMS User OMSUSR 100 USD 24,720.00
3 Integration Toolkit (option) OMSAPI 1 USD 1,765.00
4 Asset Builder (option) OMSABD 1 USD 1,175.00
5 811 Integration 811NORINT 1 USD 5,150.00
6 SCF City 40,000 - 59,999 (includes 40 SCF users) SCC004 1 USD 18,745.00 7 Facilities Domain DOM001 1 USD 0.00
8 Signal Domain DOM006 1 USD 0.00
9 Parks & Recreation Domain DOM004 1 USD 0.00
10 Sanitary Sewer Domain DOM005 1 USD 0.00
11 Stormwater Domain DOM007 1 USD 0.00
12 Transportation Domain DOM008 1 USD 0.00
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
No. Product Code Quantity Price
13 Walkability Domain DOM009 1 USD 0.00
14 Water Distribution Domain DOM010 1 USD 0.00
Term 02 - 12/1/2023 - 11/30/2024 - Subscription TOTAL: USD 101,825.00 Term 03 - 12/1/2024 - 11/30/2025 -
Subscription
No. Product Code Quantity Price
1 OMS Plus OMSPLS 1 USD 51,780.00
2 OMS User OMSUSR 100 USD 25,460.00
3 Integration Toolkit (option) OMSAPI 1 USD 1,820.00
4 Asset Builder (option) OMSABD 1 USD 1,210.00
5 811 Integration 811NORINT 1 USD 5,305.00
6 SCF City 40,000 - 59,999 (includes 40 SCF users) SCC004 1 USD 19,305.00 7 Facilities Domain DOM001 1 USD 0.00
8 Signal Domain DOM006 1 USD 0.00
9 Parks & Recreation Domain DOM004 1 USD 0.00
10 Sanitary Sewer Domain DOM005 1 USD 0.00
11 Stormwater Domain DOM007 1 USD 0.00
12 Transportation Domain DOM008 1 USD 0.00
13 Walkability Domain DOM009 1 USD 0.00
14 Water Distribution Domain DOM010 1 USD 0.00
Term 03 - 12/1/2024 - 11/30/2025 - Subscription TOTAL: USD 104,880.00 Summary By Term - Includes Services & Subscriptions
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Term 1 USD 115,340.00
Total Term 2 USD 101,825.00
Total Term 3 USD 104,880.00
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Investment Notes:
• All pricing presented in this document is valid through the date of expiration. Any pricing concessions made are only applicable to this transaction and should not be assumed for future purchases.
• Purchasing the products presented in this document through any alternative procurement method other than that identified will require a revised price proposal which may include an associated price adjustment.
• Any applicable taxes are not included.
• Pricing does not include any applicable Esri ArcGIS licenses. • Customer Purchase Order or Contract must reference the Cartegraph Purchase Agreement Number identified on the title page of this document for pricing to be valid. • All pricing is in U.S. Dollars ($USD).
• Pricing is valid through 11/30/2022
• Hosting includes 250 GB of available file storage. If additional storage in required, the Customer can purchase additional storage in 1 TB increments. The fee for adding additional storage is $2,500 per 1 TB of storage for the initial annual term. Each additional annual term will incur a 3% uplift.
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Payment Terms and Conditions
In consideration for the Solutions provided by Cartegraph to Customer, Customer agrees to pay Cartegraph the Fees as described below:
DELIVERY
Upon execution of this Purchase Agreement, Cartegraph will provide the Solution Subscriptions and/or Solution Services as detailed in the Investment Summary.
SOLUTION SUBSCRIPTION INVOICING
Customer shall be provided with the ability to access and use the Solution Subscriptions upon execution of this Purchase Agreement. The payment for the initial term is due upon execution of the Purchase Agreement.
Payment for any subsequent renewal terms will be due in annual installments as specified herein and prior to the anniversary of the initial term in the amount(s) that follow:
• Term 1: $115,340.00
• Term 2: $101,825.00
• Term 3: $104,880.00
PAYMENT
• All payments are due Net 30 days from date of invoice. • All payments are to be in U.S. Dollars ($USD).
• For customers within the United States, any applicable taxes required at the time of invoice will be determined based on the laws and regulations of the taxing authority(s) governing the "Customer Address" identified herein.
TERMINATION FOR NON-APPROPRIATION.
For public governmental Customers, if funds are not appropriated or otherwise made available to support the continuation of its obligations under this agreement, this Contract will be terminated automatically as of the beginning of the period for which funds are not available. Customer shall provide sixty (60) days written notice to Cartegraph of such non-appropriation of funds, and this Agreement shall terminate, provided, however, that each party shall remain liable for all obligations accrued up to the date of such termination.
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Acceptance
BY SIGNING BELOW, THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ALL USE AND ACCESS TO THE SOLUTIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE CARTEGRAPH SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT. THE PARTIES AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
OF THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT, THE CARTEGRAPH SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT, AND ALL OTHER AGREEMENTS AND ADDENDUMS SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED HEREIN.
Cartegraph Systems LLC:
By:
(Signature)
(Print Name)
Title:
Date:
City of La Mesa:
By:
(Signature)
(Print Name)
Title:
Date:
Drew Dingman
CFO
October 14, 2022
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
ADDENDUM A
Solutions Support
As part of the annual Solution Subscription fee identified in the above Investment Summary, Customer will receive the following support for the duration of the paid subscription Term.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
1. Campus – www.cartegraph.com/campus
Our User Assistance area is a convenient and easily shareable resource designed to help you and your co-workers better understand the functions and capabilities of your Cartegraph Solutions.
Instantly access user tips, step-by- step guides, videos, and more.
2. Dedicated, Unlimited, Toll-free Phone Support - 877.647.3050 and Live Chat When questions need answers and difficulties arise, count on our industry- leading Support team to provide the guidance and assistance you need. Live Chat is available within the product or through Campus. Reach us as often as you need Monday-Friday, 7:00 am-7:00 pm CT.
3. Secure, Live Remote Support
If your challenge requires a more hands-on approach, we have the remote support tools to fix it. Let one of our Support Team members directly interact with your system to find a fast, effective solution.
TRAINING & EDUCATION SUPPORT
1. Convenient Online Resources
All the information you need, one click away. Take advantage of online training opportunities, tutorial videos, upcoming event information, and more.
2. Customer Led User Groups
Meet and network with similar Cartegraph users in your region. Customer led User Groups allow you to find out what other organizations are doing to get more from their Cartegraph solutions and services.
RELEASES & UPGRADES
1. New Releases
Be the first to know about all new Cartegraph releases, enhancements, and upgrades. Cartegraph is continuously innovating and enhancing the Cartegraph OMS collection of products and as a customer with an active subscription, you will receive each new release of the software.
1. Your cloud-hosted site will be automatically upgraded by our System Consultants after the release is available. This way, you'll experience increased system performance while gaining timely access to the latest features and functionality.
2. For your on-Premises Installation, our Technical Consultants will work with your organization's IT staff to receive the latest software release in a timely manner. This way, you'll experience increased system performance while gaining prompt access to the latest features and functionality
2. Service Packs
A Service Pack consists of lower-severity bug fixes and/or small platform updates.
1. If required, cloud-hosted sites will receive Service Packs as needed. These Service Packs are installed by the Cartegraph System Consultants.
2. On-premises customers that contacted Cartegraph Technical Support about an issue that is resolved with the Service Pack, will be provided the service pack for installation. These onPage 8 of 15
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
premises customers can then schedule a time to install the Service Pack with our Technical Support team
3. Hot Fixes
If an issue is determined to be a defect and falls outside the standard release cycle, Cartegraph will issue a hot fix and provide application specialists with detailed levels of product knowledge to work with you in achieving a timely and effective resolution.
Cartegraph will provide the Support Services only to Customer, provided that Cartegraph reserves the right to contact any third party as necessary to facilitate the delivery of Support Services or other services relating to the Solutions. Said support applies only to the most current version of the product and the previous version in succession.
All Support Services are dependent upon the use by Customer of the Solutions in accordance with Cartegraph's documentation and specifications. Cartegraph is under no obligation to modify the Solutions so that the modified Solutions would depart from Cartegraph's published documentation and specifications for such Solutions.
City of La Mesa / 9/2/2022
ADDENDUM B
Not Used.
City of La Mesa / 9/2/2022
ADDENDUM C
SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT can be found at www.cartegraph.com/solutions-agreement
City of La Mesa / 9/2/2022
ADDENDUM D
Not Used.
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
ADDENDUM E
Cartegraph OMS Editions
Cartegraph OMS supports customers in the operation, maintenance, and management of the following asset domains. By employing these features as applicable, customers can effectively manage and report on the assets that they care about. Indicated below are the capabilities and options available for each OMS Edition at the time this document was prepared, which are subject to change.
Essentials Pro Plus Premium
Dashboard / Home Screen Included Included Included Included User Management
Included Included Included Included
Role Management Included Included Included
Esri GIS Integration
Included Included Included Included
Report Viewer
Included Included Included Included
Library Management Included Included Included Included
Standard KPI / ROI gadgets Included Included Included Included Esri Identity-Ready Included Included Included Included Structure Manager
Included Included Included
Layout Manager
Included Included Included
Import / Export
Included Included Included
Record Filter Administration Included Included Included Container / Component
Included Included Included Included
Embedded Maps Included Included Included Included
Report Designer
Included Included Included
Integration Toolkit Option Option Included
Cartegraph for Zapier Option Option Included Included
Automation Manager
Included Included
Notification Manager Included Included Included
Routing – Esri Identity Required Included Included Included Included Geocode Options- Esri Identity Required Included Included Included Included Work
Task Management Included Included Included Included
City of La Mesa / 10/11/2022
Work Orders Included Included
Task Calendar Included Included Included Included
Scenario Builder Option Included
Request
Request Management
Required w/ SeeClickFix Included Included Included
SeeClickFix Option Option Option Option
Internal Requests Option Included Included
Resources
Resource Management (LEMV)
Included Included Included Included
Advanced Material Management
Option Included
Fleet Management
Option Included Included
Assets
Asset Inventory By Domain/Asset By Domain/Asset By Domain/Asset By Domain/Asset Container / Component Included Included Included Included Preventative Maintenance Plans
Included Included Included
Asset Condition Manager / Advanced
Inspections
Required w/ Fleet Mgmt. Included Included
Asset Builder
Option Option Included
City of La Mesa / 9/2/2022
ADDENDUM F
Not Used.
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 25, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030
(0.5) OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE,
ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO ALLISON AVENUE
AS A THROUGH STREET
DESCRIPTION: Installation of all-way stop control on Allison Avenue at its western intersection with Palm Avenue
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City of La Mesa approve a resolution amending subsection 12.28.030 (0.5) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to Allison Avenue as a through street to read as follows:
(0.5) Allison Avenue from the southeasterly line of University Avenue to the northwesterly line of La Mesa Boulevard, except at its intersection with Date Avenue, its intersection with the northerly approach of Palm Avenue, and at the traffic signal at Spring Street.
Recommendation:
Adopt the attached resolution amending subsection 12.28.030 (0.5) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to Allison Avenue as a through street to read as follows:
(0.5) Allison Avenue from the southeasterly line of University Avenue to the northwesterly line of La Mesa Boulevard, except at its intersection with Date Avenue, its intersection with the northerly approach of Palm Avenue, and at the traffic signal at Spring Street.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: 10/25/2022
Page: 2 of 2
Fiscal Impact:
Funds for the installation of the all way stop are available in Public Works Operations account 3107-6420.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Effective and efficient traffic circulation and transportation BACKGROUND:
The City received a request for installing stop signs on Allison Avenue at the northerly approach from Palm Avenue. The northerly approach of Palm Avenue has an existing stop sign (controlled). The City contracted Kimley-Horn to perform a warrant study at this intersection. The study was completed in June of this year (Attachment B), indicating that an all way stop at this intersection is warranted.
DISCUSSION:
The City has reviewed potential locations to install stop signs at this location. Based on physical constraints and safety considerations, it was decided to install stop signs in the center of the street. Attachment C provides a layout of the proposed all way stop.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution amending subsection 12.28.030 (0.5) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to Allison Avenue as a through street to read as follows:
(0.5) Allison Avenue from the southeasterly line of University Avenue to the northwesterly line of La Mesa Boulevard, except at its intersection with Date Avenue, its intersection with the Northerly Approach of Palm Avenue, and at the traffic signal at Spring Street.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne
City Manager Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments: A - Resolution- Amendment to Subsection 12.28.030 (0.5) B – Stop Warrant Study
C – All Way Stop Layout
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030 (0.5) OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL
CODE, ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO ALLISON AVENUE AS A THROUGH STREET
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:
Subsection 12.28.030 (0.5) of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
(0.5) ALLISON AVENUE from the southeasterly line of University Avenue to the northwesterly line of La Mesa Boulevard, except at its intersection with Date Avenue, its intersection with the northerly approach of Palm Avenue, and at the traffic signal at Spring Street.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 25th day of October 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 June 28, 2022
Mr. Michael Kinnard
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa CA 91942
RE: Multi-Way Stop Analysis at Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue Dear Mr. Kinnard,
In accordance with your request, Kimley-Horn and Associates have prepared this memo to provide a comprehensive multi-way stop analysis for the intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue. The intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue is currently a four-legged off-set intersection with the northbound and southbound approaches stop-controlled and the westbound and eastbound approaches free. This multi-way stop analysis was prepared using the existing counts that were conducted on Wednesday, May 4, 2022 between 12:00 am and 12:00 pm. Existing counts are included as an attachment.
ALL-WAY STOP ANALYSIS
Per direction from the City of La Mesa, all components outlined in the Department of Public Works Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop (April 8, 2003) were addressed when performing this all-way stop analysis.
The City of La Mesa Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop control lists five cases that must be considered within an engineering study. Generally, all-way stops are installed where traffic signals are warranted and/or accident history has been indicated by reported accidents of a type susceptible to correction by an all-way stop. Points are assigned to each warrant. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum of 45 points. A brief summary of each warrant is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue intersection analysis, when applicable.
Case 1
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the point system is not applicable if Caltrans’ Traffic Manual Criteria is met. In Chapter 4, Signs, refers to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Part 2.
Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation. Generally, multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. When an intersection meets one or more of the criteria, it should be considered for a multi-way STOP sign installation. A brief summary of each CA-MUTCD criteria with the corresponding calculations for the Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue intersection analysis, when applicable, is included as an attachment.
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 The intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue did not meet any of the criteria for a multi-way STOP sign installation based on CA-MUTCD guidance, therefore Case 1 is not satisfied.
Case 2 (10 bonus points)
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the subject intersection shall receive 10 points if the four conditions below are met. A brief summary of each condition is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue intersection analysis, when applicable. a) The street to be controlled is within a residence district Based on Section 515 of the California Vehicle Code, Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue are within a business district.
b) The street to be controlled is classified/functioning as a collector According to the City of La Mesa General Plan, Allison Avenue and Palm Avenue are classified as a local road.
c) The subject intersection is not within 600 feet from the nearest controlled intersection along the collector
The nearest controlled intersection (Allison Avenue and Spring Street) is approximately 370 feet from the intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue. d) There is a parallel arterial highway that can be used as an alternative route Spring Street is classified as an arterial highway and can be used as an alternative route.
Conditions A, B, and C are not met therefore no points are awarded.
POINTS: 0
1. Accident Warrant (25 points)
Five points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an all-way stop control during any 12-month period prior to the investigation date.
Per TIMS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2014 and 12/01/2019. TIMS states that 2020-2021 collision data is provisional and subject to change. According to TIMS collision data, one crash was reported on July 30, 2019. Crashes susceptible to correction by an all-way stop control include right and left-turn collisions and right-angle collisions. The crash is susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop. TIMS Collision Data is attached.
Total number of accidents correctable by all-way stop: 1 POINTS: 5
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411
2. Unusual Condition Warrant (21 points)
Where unusual conditions exist, points are assigned on the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. The 45-point minimum requirement may be waived and an all-way stop may be installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a documented problem.
All-way stops may be justified based on projected volumes and accident frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within a specified period of times.
Unusual Conditions:
A. Adjacent school, fire station, playground, senior center and/or amusement park 0 Points – There are none of the above within 500 feet of the intersection.
B. Any visibility obstructions which result in limited stopping sight distance based on either the posted speed limit or the 85% ile speed
6 Points – There are parking obstructions that result in limited sight distance at the intersection.
From Palm Avenue, northbound and southbound traffic looking east, have a total of 115’ available corner sight distance. Per Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the minimum corner sight distance for a roadway with a design speed of 25 mph is 275 feet. The intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue provides for less than 50% of the required sight distance. Sight Distance Photos are included as an attachment.
C. An intersection leading to an arterial from an interior (circular) collector. 0 Points – Not applicable.
D. Intersection with steep grades within 500 feet from the intersection on the downhill approach 0 Points – There is no grade that is greater than six percent in the vicinity of the intersection.
E. Intersection is on “Suggested Route To School” and no other controlled crossing is located within 600’
0 Points – Not applicable.
F. High Approach Speeds
0 Points – No speed survey has been conducted at Allison Avenue. The existing speed limit on Allison Avenue is 25 mph. To be conservative, it is assumed that the prevailing speeds are more than 10 mph higher than the posted speed limit.
G. Curbside Facilities/Services
0 Points – There are no curbside Facilities/Services within the vicinity of the intersection.
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 POINTS: 6
3. Pedestrian Volume (20 points)
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the busiest hour of an average day.
No pedestrian crossing counts have been conducted at Allison Avenue. However, this intersection is in the center district, with heavy pedestrian activity, therefore 20 maximum points is assigned.
POINTS: 20
4. Traffic Volume (24 points)
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the eight busiest hours of an average day.
Hour
Ending
At:
0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 NB 30 87 222 232 158 158 185 158 146 188 244 175 191 153 98 SB 5 15 30 42 44 29 53 43 53 64 88 97 81 51 23
Subtotal 35 102 252 274 202 187 238 201 199 252 332 272 272 204 121 EB 10 39 108 142 100 92 131 122 147 140 155 147 146 95 70 WB 21 54 98 115 99 93 117 124 157 144 175 180 157 122 73 Subtotal 31 93 206 257 199 185 248 246 304 284 330 327 303 217 143 TOTAL 66 195 458 531 401 372 486 447 503 536 662 599 575 421 264 POINTS 1 3 1 2 3 3 3 3
In residence districts, if the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 35 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants 70% of the above requirements. Thresholds are still not met based on traffic counts.
POINTS: 19
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411
5. Traffic Volume Difference (10 points)
For T-intersections, the percent is the ratio of the minor street approach volume to the highest singleleg approach volume on the major street. 3382 (24-Hour Minor St Approach Volume) = 92%
3664 (24-Hour Major St Approach Volume)
POINTS: 9
6. Caltrans Criteria (Chapter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual) Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation regardless of the point system:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation
The intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue does not warrant the installation of a traffic control signal.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include rightand left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
Per TIMS collision data, the 12-month data was taken between 01/01/2014 and 12/01/2019.
TIMS states that 2020-2021 collision data is provisional and subject to change. According to TIMS collision data, one crash was reported on July 30, 2019. The crash is susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop.
3. Minimum traffic volumes – the total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but when the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements According to counts conducted, the average total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 544 vehicles for any 8 hours of an average day. Given the existing speed limit and roadway characteristics, the 85th percentile approach speed of Allison Avenue does not exceed 40 mph.
Based on Caltrans criteria, the intersection of Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue does not warrant a multiway STOP sign installation.
TOTAL POINTS: 59
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Final Recommendation
After performing all cases listed in the City of La Mesa’s Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop, it is recommended to install an all-way stop at Allison Avenue at Palm Avenue. The all-way stop analysis above resulted in a total score of 59 points, where the minimum required to justify an all-way stop is 45 points (out of 100 possible points).
Please call me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Leo Espelet, P.E., T.E.
RCE P.E. No. 71532
T.E. No. 2678
Attachments:
• Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications
• Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets
• Attachment C – TIMS – Collision Data
• Attachment D – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheets • Attachment E – Intersection Sight Distance Photos
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications
Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation.
Criteria A states that where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
The intersection of Allison Ave at Palm Ave does not warrant the installation of a traffic control signal. This criteria is not met.
Criteria B analyses the crash history at the intersection. For this criteria, five or more reported crashes must be reported within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop. Crashes susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop include right- and left-turn collisions and right-angle collisions.
Per TIMS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2014 and 12/01/2019. TIMS states that 2020-2021 collision data is provisional and subject to change. According to TIMS collision data, one crash was reported on July 30, 2019. This criteria is not met.
Criteria C analyses the minimum volumes at the intersection approaches. This criteria has three parts.
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.
According to counts conducted, the average vehicular volume entering the intersection from both approaches of the major street is 282 vehicles for 8 hours of an average day. This criteria is not met.
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor–street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.
The pedestrian and bicycle volumes could not be analyzed for this intersection because they were not provided. This criteria is not met.
3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Given the existing speed limit and roadway characteristics, the 85th percentile approach speed of Allison Ave does not exceed 40 mph. This criteria is not met.
Criteria D states that where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 can be satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. This criteria is not met.
Based on the 20 percent reduction minimums, the criteria is not met.
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets
Day: City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA22_040069_001
NB SB EB WB
672 764 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 11 8 19
0:15 0 0 0 13 11 24
0:30 0 0 0 7 8 15
0:45 1 1 1 1 2 2 15 46 16 43 31 89
1:00 0 0 0 12 16 28
1:15 0 0 0 11 13 24
1:30 0 0 0 9 11 20
1:45 2 2 0 2 2 6 38 13 53 19 91
2:00 1 1 2 8 16 24
2:15 1 0 1 9 17 26
2:30 0 0 0 17 14 31
2:45 0 2 0 1 0 3 12 46 17 64 29 110
3:00 0 0 0 8 20 28
3:15 0 0 0 16 15 31
3:30 0 0 0 10 33 43
3:45 0 0 0 16 50 20 88 36 138
4:00 1 0 1 5 25 30
4:15 0 0 0 9 22 31
4:30 1 0 1 8 28 36
4:45 0 2 1 1 1 3 10 32 22 97 32 129
5:00 2 2 4 20 17 37
5:15 1 0 1 10 29 39
5:30 0 2 2 8 22 30
5:45 4 7 1 5 5 12 5 43 13 81 18 124
6:00 5 3 8 7 16 23
6:15 9 4 13 4 11 15
6:30 13 2 15 7 12 19
6:45 7 34 6 15 13 49 8 26 12 51 20 77
7:00 14 3 17 8 6 14
7:15 26 9 35 4 4 8
7:30 23 10 33 8 9 17
7:45 21 84 8 30 29 114 6 26 4 23 10 49
8:00 23 11 34 4 7 11
8:15 19 10 29 4 5 9
8:30 13 7 20 3 8 11
8:45 20 75 14 42 34 117 4 15 5 25 9 40
9:00 11 14 25 3 5 8
9:15 9 13 22 3 4 7
9:30 8 8 16 4 3 7
9:45 14 42 9 44 23 86 2 12 2 14 4 26
10:00 8 4 12 0 1 1
10:15 11 5 16 2 1 3
10:30 11 6 17 3 1 4
10:45 8 38 14 29 22 67 2 7 0 3 2 10
11:00 8 14 22 1 1 2
11:15 9 12 21 1 0 1
11:30 12 14 26 0 0 0
11:45 13 42 13 53 26 95 0 2 0 1 0 3
TOTALS 329 221 550 343 543 886
SPLIT % 59.8% 40.2% 38.3% 38.7% 61.3% 61.7%
NB SB EB WB
672 764 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:15 10:45 7:15 14:30 15:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 93 54 131 53 100 144
Pk Hr Factor 0.894 0.964 0.936 0.779 0.758 0.923
7 - 9 Volume 159 72 0 0 231 75 178 0 0 253
7 - 9 Peak Hour 7:15 8:00 7:15 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 93 42 0 0 131 48 97 0 0 144
Pk Hr Factor 0.894 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.936 0.600 0.866 0.000 0.000 0.923 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Palm Ave N/O Allison Ave
Wednesday
5/4/2022
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,436
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
SPLIT %
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,436
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Day: City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA22_040069_002
NB SB EB WB
2,618 1,331 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 2 2 4 39 23 62
0:15 2 0 2 43 19 62
0:30 0 0 0 38 23 61
0:45 2 6 0 2 2 8 38 158 23 88 61 246
1:00 0 2 2 57 30 87
1:15 0 0 0 53 26 79
1:30 2 1 3 16 34 50
1:45 2 4 0 3 2 7 20 146 37 127 57 273
2:00 0 0 0 28 33 61
2:15 2 0 2 51 31 82
2:30 0 0 0 64 31 95
2:45 2 4 0 2 4 45 188 26 121 71 309
3:00 0 0 0 56 30 86
3:15 0 0 0 72 20 92
3:30 2 0 2 53 48 101
3:45 0 2 0 0 2 63 244 40 138 103 382
4:00 2 0 2 41 37 78
4:15 2 0 2 57 23 80
4:30 1 1 2 32 43 75
4:45 9 14 1 2 10 16 45 175 31 134 76 309
5:00 9 1 10 65 20 85
5:15 8 2 10 60 31 91
5:30 8 2 10 32 35 67
5:45 5 30 0 5 5 35 34 191 22 108 56 299
6:00 15 5 20 55 25 80
6:15 14 11 25 38 17 55
6:30 38 12 50 31 10 41
6:45 20 87 18 46 38 133 29 153 22 74 51 227
7:00 55 12 67 33 12 45
7:15 49 10 59 21 9 30
7:30 56 10 66 23 8 31
7:45 62 222 10 42 72 264 21 98 8 37 29 135
8:00 71 25 96 28 12 40
8:15 40 23 63 22 5 27
8:30 65 10 75 15 8 23
8:45 56 232 20 78 76 310 14 79 7 32 21 111
9:00 43 20 63 11 6 17
9:15 39 13 52 4 2 6
9:30 34 25 59 15 2 17
9:45 42 158 12 70 54 228 12 42 1 11 13 53
10:00 45 19 64 11 3 14
10:15 40 21 61 5 1 6
10:30 53 17 70 3 4 7
10:45 20 158 26 83 46 241 10 29 2 10 12 39
11:00 37 37 74 0 1 1
11:15 51 31 82 6 0 6
11:30 41 27 68 4 2 6
11:45 56 185 19 114 75 299 3 13 3 6 6 19
TOTALS 1102 445 1547 1516 886 2402
SPLIT % 71.2% 28.8% 39.2% 63.1% 36.9% 60.8%
NB SB EB WB
2,618 1,331 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:15 10:45 8:00 15:00 15:30 15:00
AM Pk Volume 238 121 310 244 148 382
Pk Hr Factor 0.838 0.818 0.807 0.847 0.771 0.927
7 - 9 Volume 454 120 0 0 574 366 242 0 0 608
7 - 9 Peak Hour 7:15 8:00 8:00 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 238 78 0 0 310 202 134 0 0 327
Pk Hr Factor 0.838 0.780 0.000 0.000 0.807 0.777 0.779 0.000 0.000 0.898 Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,949
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Palm Ave S/O Allison Ave
Wednesday
5/4/2022
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,949
Day: City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA22_040069_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 1,775 1,890
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 2 2 33 24 57
0:15 2 3 5 29 31 60
0:30 0 0 0 21 31 52
0:45 2 4 1 6 3 10 39 122 38 124 77 246
1:00 0 1 1 40 38 78
1:15 0 0 0 47 39 86
1:30 1 2 3 26 38 64
1:45 1 2 1 4 2 6 34 147 42 157 76 304
2:00 1 0 1 29 39 68
2:15 1 0 1 26 34 60
2:30 0 2 2 39 36 75
2:45 0 2 0 2 0 4 46 140 35 144 81 284
3:00 1 0 1 35 61 96
3:15 0 0 0 39 29 68
3:30 0 0 0 30 45 75
3:45 0 1 0 0 1 51 155 40 175 91 330
4:00 1 0 1 38 47 85
4:15 0 2 2 33 34 67
4:30 1 0 1 38 56 94
4:45 0 2 2 4 2 6 38 147 43 180 81 327
5:00 2 3 5 47 34 81
5:15 3 6 9 39 42 81
5:30 1 5 6 29 49 78
5:45 4 10 7 21 11 31 31 146 32 157 63 303
6:00 2 11 13 26 36 62
6:15 8 10 18 26 33 59
6:30 14 16 30 17 26 43
6:45 15 39 17 54 32 93 26 95 27 122 53 217
7:00 14 11 25 19 24 43
7:15 25 25 50 24 22 46
7:30 30 27 57 10 12 22
7:45 39 108 35 98 74 206 17 70 15 73 32 143
8:00 46 34 80 16 27 43
8:15 36 29 65 13 14 27
8:30 27 25 52 12 10 22
8:45 33 142 27 115 60 257 18 59 15 66 33 125
9:00 29 25 54 11 17 28
9:15 25 30 55 9 14 23
9:30 10 26 36 7 10 17
9:45 36 100 18 99 54 199 10 37 6 47 16 84
10:00 27 17 44 1 7 8
10:15 22 25 47 6 4 10
10:30 27 22 49 5 3 8
10:45 16 92 29 93 45 185 4 16 8 22 12 38
11:00 34 29 63 2 5 7
11:15 25 32 57 5 1 6
11:30 33 27 60 1 3 4
11:45 39 131 29 117 68 248 0 8 1 10 1 18
TOTALS 633 613 1246 1142 1277 2419
SPLIT % 50.8% 49.2% 34.0% 47.2% 52.8% 66.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 1,775 1,890
AM Peak Hour 7:30 7:30 7:30 16:30 16:00 15:45
AM Pk Volume 151 125 276 162 180 337
Pk Hr Factor 0.821 0.893 0.863 0.862 0.804 0.896
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 250 213 463 0 0 293 337 630
7 - 9 Peak Hour 7:30 7:30 7:30 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 151 125 276 0 0 162 180 337
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.821 0.893 0.863 0.000 0.000 0.862 0.804 0.896 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Allison Ave Bet. Palm Ave N & Palm Ave S
Wednesday
5/4/2022
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,665
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
SPLIT %
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,665
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment C – TIMS – Collision Data
https://tims.berkeley.edu/
2022/05/19 TIMS - Transportation Injury Mapping System
Crash Details for: Case ID 8914476
Crash Information
Parties: 1
Map View
Street View
County San Diego
City La Mesa
Date & Time (M/D/Y) 07/30/2019 09:30
Location (Intersection) Allison Av & Palm Av
Dist. & Dir. from
Intersection
At Intersection
State Highway No
Geocoded Location 32.7660408, -117.0194931
Type of Crash - - Not Stated
Motor Vehicle Involved
With
A - Non-Collision
Crash Severity 3 - Injury (Other Visible)
PCF Violation Category - - Not Stated
Weather A - Clear
Alcohol Involved No
Pedestrian Accident No Bicycle Accident Yes
Motorcycle Accident No Truck Accident No
Party
Number
Party Type Statewide Vehicle Type At
Fault
Party
Direction
Movement Preceding
Collision
1 4 - Bicyclist L - Bicycle No West E - Making Left Turn Victims: 1
Party Number Victim Role Victim Gender Victim Age Victim Degree of Injury 1 4 - Bicyclist M - Male 38 6 - Suspected Minor Injury
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment D – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheets
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 844
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
MAY 4, 2022 ALLISON AVE PALM AVE X
0800
0900
1200
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
08000900
1200
1400
1500
1600
17001800
98 115 99 117 157 175 180 157 222 232 185 146 188 244 175 191 222 232 185 146 188 244 175 191 206 257 248 304 284 330 327 303 X X
X
X
X
X
X
2530
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 845
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
0800
0900
1200
1400
222 232 185 146 X 206 257 248 304 X
X
0900
232 257 X
X
X
X
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 846
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 847
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
370' X
X
X
X
X
X
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 848
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
X
X
X
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 839
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 840
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
_____________________________________________________________________________________
POINTS DON'T FALL ON GRAPH
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment E – Intersection Sight Distance Photos
FROM PALM AVENUE (30 MPH) – SOUTHBOUND LOOKING RIGHT (WEST) FROM PALM AVENUE (30 MPH) – SOUTHBOUND LOOKING LEFT (EAST)
FROM PALM AVENUE (30 MPH) – NORTHBOUND LOOKING RIGHT (EAST) FROM PALM AVENUE (30 MPH) – NORTHBOUND LOOKING LEFT (WEST)
STOP STOP
STOP KEEP CLEAR STOP
LEGEND
30" STOP SIGN
CROSS WALK
EDGE OF CURB
1' THICK STOP BAR
STOP SIGN PROTECTION ZONE
PARKING INDICATOR
STOP LEGEND
DOUBLE YELLOW LINE STRIPING
ALLISON AVE. PALM AVE. PALM AVE.
STOP
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 25, 2022
SUBJECT: AWARDING OF THE PURCHASE OF ONE
CHEVROLET BOLT EUV FOR BUILDING INSPECTION
TO BOB STALL CHEVROLET
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council adopt the resolution to add one vehicle to the current equipment replacement schedule and award the purchase of one Chevrolet Bolt EUV for Building Inspection to Bob Stall Chevrolet?
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt the resolution to add one vehicle to the current equipment replacement schedule and award the purchase of one Chevrolet Bolt EUV for Building Inspection to Bob Stall Chevrolet.
Fiscal Impact:
The quoted cost for the purchase of one Chevrolet Bolt EUV is $31,908.84.
Funds are currently available in Equipment Replacement Fund account 1315- 6584. A total of $33,000 is requested to be transferred to vehicle replacement account 1315-6585 to include the vehicle purchase and outfitting.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Continue to improve high quality municipal services
Foster community health by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving environmental quality
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 25, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
T-6 Municipal Fleet – Promote efforts that transition municipal vehicle fleet from gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles to alternative-fuel or lowemissions vehicles.
BACKGROUND:
One Chevrolet Bolt EUV (Electric Utility Vehicle) was budgeted last fiscal year and has already been ordered to replace a 2007 Ford Escape Hybrid inspection vehicle for the Building Division. This division has a second 2007 Ford Escape Hybrid which is also used daily around the City by staff.
The City Hall fleet includes eight vehicles assigned to two departments (Community Development and Engineering). Two of the vehicles are specialized (an F-150 for the Public Works Inspector and a Ford Escape with a roof attachment for the Fats Oils and Grease (FOG) Inspector) and the remaining six include two Escapes of less than eight years of age and four other SUVs ranging from 12-15 years old, including the two hybrids referenced above. The vehicles not used by inspectors can be borrowed by other departments when requested.
In 2018, the City adopted the Climate Action Plan (CAP) which includes a greenhouse gas reduction goal of 53% by 2035. The CAP provides a list of measures and actions to explore in order to achieve this goal, including transitioning municipal vehicle fleet from gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles to zero-emissions vehicles.
The FY19-22 CAP Implementation Plan Measure T-6, Municipal Fleet, includes exploring opportunities to integrate alternative fuel options and more efficient vehicles, including EVs, into the City's fleet as older vehicles become eligible for replacement. In 2019, the City's fleet was analyzed as part of technical assistance provided by the San Diego Clean Cities Coalition and future opportunities continue to be explored.
DISCUSSION:
Chevrolet Bolt EUVs are currently available for order. Replacing the second 2007 hybrid now will increase the City’s EV use for a heavily-used vehicle. Further, moving the newer non-inspection vehicles to a pool system for City Hall will better utilize the vehicles and reduce maintenance needs and costs. An additional older SUV (2010 Ford Explorer) will be retired and the City Hall fleet will be reduced from eight vehicles to seven. The additional EV would also move the City Hall fleet to almost 30% full-electric in support of the City’s CAP. Future vehicle replacements would also be electric whenever possible.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 25, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
The City received quotes from the two local Chevrolet dealerships that conduct commercial and government sales, Bob Stall in La Mesa and Courtesy Chevrolet in San Diego. A third quote from the cooperative purchasing contract Sourcewell was not available for the Bolt at this time. Bob Stall had the lowest quote at $31,908.84 after the local preference discount was applied. A total of $33,000 is recommended to be transferred from equipment replacement account 1315-6584 to vehicle replacement account 1315-6585 to include outfitting of a fuel system and logos.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution to add one vehicle to the current equipment replacement schedule with a budget of $33,000 and award the purchase of one Chevrolet Bolt EUV for Building Inspection to Bob Stall Chevrolet.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development
___________________
Scott Munzenmaier
Purchasing Officer
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Pricing Summary
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA TO
AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE CHEVROLET BOLT EUV FOR BUILDING
INSPECTION TO BOB STALL CHEVROLET
WHEREAS, one Chevrolet Bolt EUV (Electric Utility Vehicle) has been ordered to replace a 2007 Ford Escape Hybrid inspection vehicle for the Building Division and the division has a second hybrid which is also used daily around the City by staff; WHEREAS, Chevrolet Bolt EUVs are currently available for order and replacing the second 2007 hybrid now will take advantage of favorable ordering timing and increase the City’s EV use for a heavily-used vehicle;
WHEREAS, the additional electric vehicle would also move the City Hall fleet to almost 30% full-electric in support of the City’s CAP; and
WHEREAS, the City received a quote from Bob Stall Chevrolet for $31,908.84 and a total of $33,000 is recommended to be transferred from equipment replacement account 1315- 6584 to vehicle replacement account 1315-6585 to include outfitting of a fuel system and logos.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council intends to add one vehicle to the equipment replacement schedule with a budget of $33,000 including outfitting costs and award the purchase of one Chevrolet Bolt EUV for Building Inspection to Bob Stall Chevrolet.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 25th day of October 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Quantity:
1 Unit Total Unit Total
Base Price 29,316.00 $ $ 29,316.00 $ 29,199.00 $ 29,199.00 Additional Costs 85.00 $ $ ‐ 85.00 $ Sales Tax 2,499.09 $ $ 2,499.09 $ 2,481.92 $ 2,481.92 Fees 8.75 $ $ 8.75 $ 38.00 $ 38.00 Paint $ ‐
TOTAL 31,908.84 $ $ 31,908.84 $ 31,718.92 $ 31,718.92 Local Dealer Preference (386.35) $ $ (386.35) ADJUSTED TOTAL 31,522.49 $ $ 31,522.49 $ 31,718.92 $ 31,718.92
FINAL AWARD
RECOMMENDATION
Bob Stall
Chevrolet $ 31,908.84
Bob Stall Chevrolet Courtesy Chevrolet
ONE CHEVROLET BOLT EUV FOR BUILDING INSPECTION