Agenda packet — La Mesa City Council, December 13, 2022

LA MESA CITY COUNCIL AND CITY OF LA MESA SUCCESSOR AGENCY AGENDA

A Regular Meeting of the City Council and a Special Meeting of the City of La Mesa Successor Agency

Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2022, 6:00 p.m.

Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:

Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Colin Parent
Councilmember Bill Baber
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Jack Shu
City Treasurer Eldon Vogt
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
In-Person/Virtual Hybrid City Council/City of La Mesa Successor Agency Meeting Pursuant to AB 361 (Government Code Section 54953(e)(1)-(2))
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region),the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.us), Facebook Live (www.facebook.com/lamesaca) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:

The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:

Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.

Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 500 words. eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 5:00 p.m., the Thursday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.

Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Page 2 of 105 ends

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator, Rida Freeman, Director of Administrative Services, 48 hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].

Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo i.d. or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. ELECTION RESULTS

2.1 DECLARING THE RESULT OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 GENERAL

MUNICIPAL ELECTION
8 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
a. CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT OF THE VOTE FOR THE
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
Recommended Motion:

The City Clerk read the Statement of Vote into the record. b. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT

OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON
NOVEMBER 8, 2022, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF

AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
c. FIVE MINUTE RECESS FOR THE TRANSITION OF THE

OUTGOING AND INCOMING COUNCILMEMBERS
d. INSTALLATION OF CITY TREASURER, COUNCILMEMBERS,

AND MAYOR

3. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

4. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

5. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

Page 3 of 105 ends

6. PRESENTATION

6.1 LA MESA ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACCELERATOR PROGRAM (LEAP)

PRESENTATION AND PARTICIPANT RECOGNITION

7. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.

If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.

8. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
(Items 10.1 through 10.7)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.7.

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

10.2 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54953, AS AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 361,

AND RE-AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL

AND/OR HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2023 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2023
24 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10.3 RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE EDCO REPRESENTATIVE TO THE

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
28 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

Page 4 of 105 ends

10.4 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 23-13 FOR

CITYWIDE COMMUNITY LITTER CLEANUP PROGRAM TO I LOVE A

CLEAN SAN DIEGO
31 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10.5 RESOLUTIONS TO AUTHORIZE TASK ORDER CHANGE ORDERS

TO PARSONS FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION
60 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 TO PARSONS TASK ORDER 6 FOR STAFF

AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE AN ASSISTANT

ENGINEER
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 TO PARSONS TASK ORDER 7 FOR STAFF

AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE A TRAFFIC

ENGINEER
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10.6 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 23-01, EL CAJON BOULEVARD AND

JESSIE AVENUE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND

AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SELECT ELECTRIC,
INC.
66 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

Page 5 of 105 ends

10.7 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIFIED GRANT

FUNDS TO FUND THE SCHOOL AND PARK MOBILITY ACCESS

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
75 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIFIED GRANT

FUNDS THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS

AND RECREATION LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR
SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS FROM BUDGET ACT 2022-2023 TO

FUND THE SCHOOL AND PARK MOBILITY ACCESS

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS; APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY

AMENDMENTS FOR THE PROJECT
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
(Items 11.1 through 11.2)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Agency or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 11.1 through 11.2.

11.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.2 RESOLUTIONS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
80 Staff Reference: Ms. Royales
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1,
2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 (ROPS 23-24 PERIOD) AND

APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

Page 6 of 105 ends

b. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS
23-24) FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM
JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 AND APPROVING

RELATED ACTIONS
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

12. ORDINANCE: SECOND READING - CITY COUNCIL

12.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 2.73.010 OF THE LA

MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST THE NUMBER OF

COMMISSIONERS ON THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND

VETERANS COMMISSION
102
Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance and the reassignments of Commissioner Don Long from an older adult representative to a veteran representative and Commissioner Glenna Bloemen from a disabled community representative to an older adult representative.

13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)

14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))

15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS

16. ADJOURNMENT

Page 7 of 105 ends

DATE: December 13, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CITY CLERK’S STATEMENT OF THE VOTE; ADOPTION OF A

RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT AND DECLARING THE RESULT
OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8,
2022; AND INSTALLATION OF MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND CITY

TREASURER
Attached is the City Clerk’s Statement of the Vote that will be read aloud and entered into the minutes, and a Resolution reciting the fact and declaring the result of the election.

Staff recommends the Council adopt the attached Resolution, followed by the installation of the Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Treasurer.

Attachments A. City Clerk’s Statement of Vote
B. Draft Resolution

Page 8 of 105 ends

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT OF THE VOTE
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 GENERAL ELECTION
The following statement shall be entered into the minutes:

I, Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, County of San Diego, State of California, do hereby state as follows:

1. The number of ballots cast in the City was 21,937.

2. The names of the persons voted for and the office for which each person was voted for are as follows:

Mayor:

Mark Arapostathis
Kristine C. Alessio
Member of the City Council:

Patricia N. Dillard
Mejgan Afshan
Kathleen Brand
Tony Orlando
Laura Lothian
City Treasurer:

William “Bill” Exeter
Matt Strabone

3. The number of votes given at each precinct to each person is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

4. The number of votes given in the City to each person is as follows:

Mayor Total Votes
Mark Arapostathis 11,386
Kristine C. Alessio 8,989
Member of the City Council Total Votes
Patricia N. Dillard 8,600
Laura Lothian 8,414
Mejgan Afshan 8,403
Tony Orlando 6,598
Kathleen Brand 3,938
City Treasurer Total Votes
Matt Strabone 10,185
William “Bill” Exeter 8,622
Dated: December 13, 2022 Megan Wiegelman, CMC
City Clerk
City of La Mesa
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 9 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA,

RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER

MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
___________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of La Mesa, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, as required by law; WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2280 adopted January 26, 1982, the election was consolidated with the Statewide general election and the Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A."

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That there were 44 voting precincts established for the purpose of holding the election consisting of the regular election precincts in the City as established for the holding of state and county elections.

SECTION 2. That the whole number of ballots cast in the City was 21,937.

SECTION 3. That the General Municipal Election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of the City as required by laws relating to cities in the State of California, to wit:

Mayor of the City for a full term of four years;
Two Members of the City Council of the City for full terms of four years; and City Treasurer of the City for a full term of four years.

SECTION 4. That the name of the person voted for at the election for Mayor is as follows:

Mark Arapostathis
Kristine C. Alessio
That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows:

Patricia N. Dillard
Mejgan Afshan
Kathleen Brand
Tony Orlando
Laura Lothian

Page 10 of 105 ends

That the name of the person voted for at the election for City Treasurer is as follows:

William “Bill” Exeter
Matt Strabone
SECTION 5. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates, are as listed in “Exhibit A” attached.

SECTION 6. The City Council does declare and determine that:

Mark Arapostathis was elected as Mayor of the City for the full term of four years; Patricia N. Dillard was elected as Member of the City Council of the City for the full term of four years;
Laura Lothian was elected as Member of the City Council of the City for the full term of four years;
Matt Strabone was elected as City Treasurer of the City for the full term of four years; SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall enter in the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election, showing: 1) the whole number of ballots cast in the City; 2) the names of the persons voted for; 3) for what office each person was voted for; 4) the number of votes given at each precinct to each person; and 5) the total number of votes given to each person.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and duly authenticated; that the City Clerk or designee shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected.

SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it in the book of original Resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California held the 13
th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 11 of 105 ends

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 12 of 105 ends

Page 13 of 105 ends

CITY OF EL CAJON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 1
GARY KENDRICK 5,864 100.00%
Total 5,864

CITY OF ENCINITAS MAYOR
TONY KRANZ 13,369 47.08%
CINDY CREMONA 7,246 25.52%
JEFF MORRIS 6,969 24.54%
MICHAEL "MYEKAH" BLOBE 811 2.86%
Total 28,395

CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 3
JOY LYNDES 3,646 51.42%
JULIE THUNDER 3,445 48.58%
Total 7,091

CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 4
BRUCE EHLERS 3,494 46.57%
PAMELA "PAM" REDELA 2,548 33.96%
DAN VAUGHN 941 12.54%
STACIE DAVIS 520 6.93%
Total 7,503

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MAYOR
DANE M. WHITE 18,317 51.60%
PAUL "MAC" MCNAMARA 17,183 48.40%
Total 35,500

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 1
CONSUELO MARTINEZ 3,139 67.36%
MIKE JOHNSON-PALOMARES 1,521 32.64%
Total 4,660

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 2
JOE GARCIA 6,426 51.02%
JEFF GRIFFITH 6,169 48.98%
Total 12,595

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH MAYOR
PALOMA AGUIRRE 2,688 45.38%
SHIRLEY NAKAWATASE 2,341 39.52%
JOHN "JACK" FISHER 795 13.42%
VANCE E. LOCKE 99 1.67%
Total 5,923

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 1
CAROL SEABURY 548 53.41%
JEN CRUMLEY 478 46.59%
Total 1,026

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 3
MITCHELL "MITCH" MCKAY 1,127 57.88%
ANNA WEBB 820 42.12%
Total 1,947

CITY OF LA MESA MAYOR
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS 11,386 55.88%
KRISTINE C. ALESSIO 8,989 44.12%
Total 20,375

CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
Vote For 2
PATRICIA N. DILLARD 8,600 23.92%
LAURA LOTHIAN 8,414 23.40%
MEJGAN AFSHAN 8,403 23.37%
TONY ORLANDO 6,598 18.35%
KATHLEEN BRAND 3,938 10.95%
Total 35,953

CITY OF LA MESA TREASURER
MATT STRABONE 10,185 54.16%
WILLIAM "BILL" EXETER 8,622 45.84%
Total 18,807

CITY OF LEMON GROVE MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
Vote For 2
ALYSSON SNOW 2,858 25.69%
JENNIFER L. MENDOZA 2,836 25.49%
STEPHANIE KLEIN 1,909 17.16%
JESSICA "JESSYKA" HEREDIA 1,781 16.01%
BLANCA LOPEZ BROWN 1,741 15.65%
Total 11,125

CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MAYOR
RON MORRISON 3,383 36.78%
JOSE RODRIGUEZ 3,315 36.04%
ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS 2,499 27.17%
Total 9,197

CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 1
LUZ MOLINA 1,597 100.00%
Total 1,597
Printed: Thursday, December 8, 2022 9:57 AM Page 10 of 16 2022 Statewide General Election
County of San Diego
November 8, 2022
Official Results (San Diego Portion Only)

Page 14 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MAYOR Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) MARK ARAPOSTATHIS KRISTINE C.

ALESSIO
1521-481200-LA MESA Vote Centers 893 57 6.38 % 23 28
1521-481200-LA MESA Mail 893 545 61.03 % 300 197
1521-481200-LA MESA Total 893 602 67.41 % 323 225
1522-481500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1680 95 5.65 % 40 49
1522-481500-LA MESA Mail 1680 947 56.37 % 467 419
1522-481500-LA MESA Total 1680 1042 62.02 % 507 468
1523-481800-LA MESA Vote Centers 878 49 5.58 % 16 27
1523-481800-LA MESA Mail 878 403 45.90 % 214 151
1523-481800-LA MESA Total 878 452 51.48 % 230 178
1524-481900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1103 68 6.17 % 30 33
1524-481900-LA MESA Mail 1103 567 51.41 % 255 259
1524-481900-LA MESA Total 1103 635 57.57 % 285 292
1525-482100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1320 80 6.06 % 24 50
1525-482100-LA MESA Mail 1320 804 60.91 % 414 346
1525-482100-LA MESA Total 1320 884 66.97 % 438 396
1526-482600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1497 82 5.48 % 27 47
1526-482600-LA MESA Mail 1497 732 48.90 % 363 306
1526-482600-LA MESA Total 1497 814 54.38 % 390 353
1527-482610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1433 93 6.49 % 32 54
1527-482610-LA MESA Mail 1433 671 46.82 % 328 293
1527-482610-LA MESA Total 1433 764 53.31 % 360 347
1528-482800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1230 62 5.04 % 17 36
1528-482800-LA MESA Mail 1230 586 47.64 % 293 248
1528-482800-LA MESA Total 1230 648 52.68 % 310 284
1529-483000-LA MESA Vote Centers 1415 55 3.89 % 22 29
1529-483000-LA MESA Mail 1415 790 55.83 % 391 328
1529-483000-LA MESA Total 1415 845 59.72 % 413 357
1530-483100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1310 66 5.04 % 21 39
1530-483100-LA MESA Mail 1310 748 57.10 % 365 328
1530-483100-LA MESA Total 1310 814 62.14 % 386 367
1531-483200-LA MESA Vote Centers 36 0 0.00 %
1531-483200-LA MESA Mail 36 23 63.89 % 8 13
1531-483200-LA MESA Total 36 23 63.89 % 8 13
1532-483300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1527 104 6.81 % 30 67
1532-483300-LA MESA Mail 1527 815 53.37 % 410 341
1532-483300-LA MESA Total 1527 919 60.18 % 440 408
1533-483600-LA MESA Vote Centers 906 41 4.53 % 10 28
1533-483600-LA MESA Mail 906 403 44.48 % 217 149
1533-483600-LA MESA Total 906 444 49.01 % 227 177
1534-483610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1045 67 6.41 % 28 37
1534-483610-LA MESA Mail 1045 536 51.29 % 269 214
1534-483610-LA MESA Total 1045 603 57.70 % 297 251
1535-484300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1422 44 3.09 % 14 25
1535-484300-LA MESA Mail 1422 557 39.17 % 264 248
1535-484300-LA MESA Total 1422 601 42.26 % 278 273
1536-484800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1226 52 4.24 % 21 27
1536-484800-LA MESA Mail 1226 704 57.42 % 350 309
1536-484800-LA MESA Total 1226 756 61.66 % 371 336
1537-484900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1329 59 4.44 % 26 26
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 1 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 15 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MAYOR Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) MARK ARAPOSTATHIS KRISTINE C.

ALESSIO
1537-484900-LA MESA Mail 1329 652 49.06 % 376 228
1537-484900-LA MESA Total 1329 711 53.50 % 402 254
1538-484910-LA MESA Vote Centers 1445 64 4.43 % 29 33
1538-484910-LA MESA Mail 1445 740 51.21 % 429 261
1538-484910-LA MESA Total 1445 804 55.64 % 458 294
1539-485090-LA MESA Vote Centers 1000 54 5.40 % 26 24
1539-485090-LA MESA Mail 1000 641 64.10 % 343 254
1539-485090-LA MESA Total 1000 695 69.50 % 369 278
1540-485200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1568 80 5.10 % 29 50
1540-485200-LA MESA Mail 1568 903 57.59 % 520 337
1540-485200-LA MESA Total 1568 983 62.69 % 549 387
1541-485300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1157 53 4.58 % 28 23
1541-485300-LA MESA Mail 1157 675 58.34 % 398 234
1541-485300-LA MESA Total 1157 728 62.92 % 426 257
1542-485600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1131 53 4.69 % 19 30
1542-485600-LA MESA Mail 1131 750 66.31 % 403 301
1542-485600-LA MESA Total 1131 803 71.00 % 422 331
1543-485610-LA MESA Vote Centers 0 1 1
1543-485610-LA MESA Mail 0 0
1543-485610-LA MESA Total 0 1 1
1544-485620-LA MESA Vote Centers 4 0 0.00 %
1544-485620-LA MESA Mail 4 3 75.00 % 3
1544-485620-LA MESA Total 4 3 75.00 % 3
1545-485800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1472 64 4.35 % 25 35
1545-485800-LA MESA Mail 1472 770 52.31 % 439 291
1545-485800-LA MESA Total 1472 834 56.66 % 464 326
1546-485900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1238 52 4.20 % 22 26
1546-485900-LA MESA Mail 1238 686 55.41 % 391 250
1546-485900-LA MESA Total 1238 738 59.61 % 413 276
1547-486400-LA MESA Vote Centers 1419 53 3.74 % 21 31
1547-486400-LA MESA Mail 1419 854 60.18 % 512 295
1547-486400-LA MESA Total 1419 907 63.92 % 533 326
1548-486500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1451 67 4.62 % 35 23
1548-486500-LA MESA Mail 1451 693 47.76 % 399 257
1548-486500-LA MESA Total 1451 760 52.38 % 434 280
1549-486800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1483 78 5.26 % 35 38
1549-486800-LA MESA Mail 1483 804 54.21 % 424 331
1549-486800-LA MESA Total 1483 882 59.47 % 459 369
1550-486900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1541 76 4.93 % 30 37
1550-486900-LA MESA Mail 1541 876 56.85 % 521 307
1550-486900-LA MESA Total 1541 952 61.78 % 551 344
1551-487010-LA MESA Vote Centers 1082 55 5.08 % 19 35
1551-487010-LA MESA Mail 1082 541 50.00 % 292 206
1551-487010-LA MESA Total 1082 596 55.08 % 311 241
1552-487030-LA MESA Vote Centers 1605 48 2.99 % 22 21
1552-487030-LA MESA Mail 1605 641 39.94 % 305 276
1552-487030-LA MESA Total 1605 689 42.93 % 327 297
1553-487530-LA MESA Vote Centers 8 1 12.50 % 1
1553-487530-LA MESA Mail 8 3 37.50 % 3
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 2 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 16 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MAYOR Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) MARK ARAPOSTATHIS KRISTINE C.

ALESSIO
1553-487530-LA MESA Total 8 4 50.00 % 1 3
8057-999057-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8057-999057-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8057-999057-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8660-999660-VBM-AV Vote Centers 1 0 0.00 %
8660-999660-VBM-AV Mail 1 1 100.00 % 1
8660-999660-VBM-AV Total 1 1 100.00 % 1
8661-999661-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8662-999662-VBM-AV Vote Centers 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Mail 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Total 2 0 0.00 %
8663-999663-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Total 0 0
Total - Vote Centers 37857 1873 4.95 % 722 1009
Total - Mail 37857 20064 53.00 % 10664 7980
Contest Total 37857 21937 57.95 % 11386 8989
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 3 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 17 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) PATRICIA N. DILLARD MEJGAN AFSHAN KATHLEEN BRAND TONY

ORLANDO
LAURA

LOTHIAN
1521-481200-LA MESA Vote Centers 893 57 6.38 % 19 16 6 23 25 1521-481200-LA MESA Mail 893 545 61.03 % 241 213 89 144 191 1521-481200-LA MESA Total 893 602 67.41 % 260 229 95 167 216 1522-481500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1680 95 5.65 % 24 24 16 48 48 1522-481500-LA MESA Mail 1680 947 56.37 % 377 312 190 307 398 1522-481500-LA MESA Total 1680 1042 62.02 % 401 336 206 355 446 1523-481800-LA MESA Vote Centers 878 49 5.58 % 10 15 6 28 24 1523-481800-LA MESA Mail 878 403 45.90 % 152 160 75 101 141 1523-481800-LA MESA Total 878 452 51.48 % 162 175 81 129 165 1524-481900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1103 68 6.17 % 21 12 10 38 34 1524-481900-LA MESA Mail 1103 567 51.41 % 180 179 84 190 244 1524-481900-LA MESA Total 1103 635 57.57 % 201 191 94 228 278 1525-482100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1320 80 6.06 % 21 23 7 45 41 1525-482100-LA MESA Mail 1320 804 60.91 % 318 274 159 272 347 1525-482100-LA MESA Total 1320 884 66.97 % 339 297 166 317 388 1526-482600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1497 82 5.48 % 24 25 16 39 32 1526-482600-LA MESA Mail 1497 732 48.90 % 289 268 138 223 272 1526-482600-LA MESA Total 1497 814 54.38 % 313 293 154 262 304 1527-482610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1433 93 6.49 % 30 28 24 35 39 1527-482610-LA MESA Mail 1433 671 46.82 % 255 229 117 210 285 1527-482610-LA MESA Total 1433 764 53.31 % 285 257 141 245 324 1528-482800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1230 62 5.04 % 16 10 9 35 35 1528-482800-LA MESA Mail 1230 586 47.64 % 221 216 112 158 219 1528-482800-LA MESA Total 1230 648 52.68 % 237 226 121 193 254 1529-483000-LA MESA Vote Centers 1415 55 3.89 % 12 15 6 31 27 1529-483000-LA MESA Mail 1415 790 55.83 % 307 271 132 232 327 1529-483000-LA MESA Total 1415 845 59.72 % 319 286 138 263 354 1530-483100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1310 66 5.04 % 18 22 8 33 35 1530-483100-LA MESA Mail 1310 748 57.10 % 278 286 156 216 286 1530-483100-LA MESA Total 1310 814 62.14 % 296 308 164 249 321 1531-483200-LA MESA Vote Centers 36 0 0.00 %
1531-483200-LA MESA Mail 36 23 63.89 % 14 11 1 4 4
1531-483200-LA MESA Total 36 23 63.89 % 14 11 1 4 4
1532-483300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1527 104 6.81 % 23 22 26 49 46 1532-483300-LA MESA Mail 1527 815 53.37 % 294 323 150 244 292 1532-483300-LA MESA Total 1527 919 60.18 % 317 345 176 293 338 1533-483600-LA MESA Vote Centers 906 41 4.53 % 13 19 7 11 17 1533-483600-LA MESA Mail 906 403 44.48 % 146 169 76 83 129 1533-483600-LA MESA Total 906 444 49.01 % 159 188 83 94 146 1534-483610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1045 67 6.41 % 22 25 16 25 26 1534-483610-LA MESA Mail 1045 536 51.29 % 192 191 108 145 199 1534-483610-LA MESA Total 1045 603 57.70 % 214 216 124 170 225 1535-484300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1422 44 3.09 % 15 18 8 18 10 1535-484300-LA MESA Mail 1422 557 39.17 % 198 221 104 156 207 1535-484300-LA MESA Total 1422 601 42.26 % 213 239 112 174 217 1536-484800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1226 52 4.24 % 15 10 9 21 25 1536-484800-LA MESA Mail 1226 704 57.42 % 270 279 114 229 263 1536-484800-LA MESA Total 1226 756 61.66 % 285 289 123 250 288 1537-484900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1329 59 4.44 % 23 29 19 19 18 1537-484900-LA MESA Mail 1329 652 49.06 % 275 298 137 138 199 Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 4 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 18 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) PATRICIA N. DILLARD MEJGAN AFSHAN KATHLEEN BRAND TONY

ORLANDO
LAURA

LOTHIAN
1537-484900-LA MESA Total 1329 711 53.50 % 298 327 156 157 217 1538-484910-LA MESA Vote Centers 1445 64 4.43 % 22 25 17 31 27 1538-484910-LA MESA Mail 1445 740 51.21 % 316 324 138 197 237 1538-484910-LA MESA Total 1445 804 55.64 % 338 349 155 228 264 1539-485090-LA MESA Vote Centers 1000 54 5.40 % 15 19 15 15 23 1539-485090-LA MESA Mail 1000 641 64.10 % 281 226 120 174 253 1539-485090-LA MESA Total 1000 695 69.50 % 296 245 135 189 276 1540-485200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1568 80 5.10 % 20 29 15 34 42 1540-485200-LA MESA Mail 1568 903 57.59 % 386 408 148 265 310 1540-485200-LA MESA Total 1568 983 62.69 % 406 437 163 299 352 1541-485300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1157 53 4.58 % 17 11 12 26 24 1541-485300-LA MESA Mail 1157 675 58.34 % 267 269 123 206 254 1541-485300-LA MESA Total 1157 728 62.92 % 284 280 135 232 278 1542-485600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1131 53 4.69 % 9 13 6 29 35 1542-485600-LA MESA Mail 1131 750 66.31 % 291 247 147 260 340 1542-485600-LA MESA Total 1131 803 71.00 % 300 260 153 289 375 1543-485610-LA MESA Vote Centers 0 1 1 1
1543-485610-LA MESA Mail 0 0
1543-485610-LA MESA Total 0 1 1 1
1544-485620-LA MESA Vote Centers 4 0 0.00 %
1544-485620-LA MESA Mail 4 3 75.00 % 1 3 2
1544-485620-LA MESA Total 4 3 75.00 % 1 3 2
1545-485800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1472 64 4.35 % 14 21 13 30 35 1545-485800-LA MESA Mail 1472 770 52.31 % 328 330 118 238 288 1545-485800-LA MESA Total 1472 834 56.66 % 342 351 131 268 323 1546-485900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1238 52 4.20 % 14 18 5 25 28 1546-485900-LA MESA Mail 1238 686 55.41 % 303 308 116 165 251 1546-485900-LA MESA Total 1238 738 59.61 % 317 326 121 190 279 1547-486400-LA MESA Vote Centers 1419 53 3.74 % 15 24 9 23 23 1547-486400-LA MESA Mail 1419 854 60.18 % 418 399 123 227 315 1547-486400-LA MESA Total 1419 907 63.92 % 433 423 132 250 338 1548-486500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1451 67 4.62 % 20 24 12 26 21 1548-486500-LA MESA Mail 1451 693 47.76 % 305 286 114 197 259 1548-486500-LA MESA Total 1451 760 52.38 % 325 310 126 223 280 1549-486800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1483 78 5.26 % 32 18 7 29 43 1549-486800-LA MESA Mail 1483 804 54.21 % 311 319 146 229 304 1549-486800-LA MESA Total 1483 882 59.47 % 343 337 153 258 347 1550-486900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1541 76 4.93 % 22 22 13 36 42 1550-486900-LA MESA Mail 1541 876 56.85 % 406 393 158 212 291 1550-486900-LA MESA Total 1541 952 61.78 % 428 415 171 248 333 1551-487010-LA MESA Vote Centers 1082 55 5.08 % 16 19 11 26 26 1551-487010-LA MESA Mail 1082 541 50.00 % 219 211 96 143 194 1551-487010-LA MESA Total 1082 596 55.08 % 235 230 107 169 220 1552-487030-LA MESA Vote Centers 1605 48 2.99 % 12 16 7 13 20 1552-487030-LA MESA Mail 1605 641 39.94 % 224 208 108 189 242 1552-487030-LA MESA Total 1605 689 42.93 % 236 224 115 202 262 1553-487530-LA MESA Vote Centers 8 1 12.50 % 1 1
1553-487530-LA MESA Mail 8 3 37.50 % 2 2 1 1
1553-487530-LA MESA Total 8 4 50.00 % 2 3 2 1
8057-999057-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 5 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 19 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) PATRICIA N. DILLARD MEJGAN AFSHAN KATHLEEN BRAND TONY

ORLANDO
LAURA

LOTHIAN
8057-999057-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8057-999057-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8660-999660-VBM-AV Vote Centers 1 0 0.00 %
8660-999660-VBM-AV Mail 1 1 100.00 % 1 1
8660-999660-VBM-AV Total 1 1 100.00 % 1 1
8661-999661-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8662-999662-VBM-AV Vote Centers 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Mail 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Total 2 0 0.00 %
8663-999663-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Total 0 0
Total - Vote Centers 37857 1873 4.95 % 535 573 337 841 871 Total - Mail 37857 20064 53.00 % 8065 7830 3601 5757 7543 Contest Total 37857 21937 57.95 % 8600 8403 3938 6598 8414 Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 6 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 20 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA TREASURER Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) WILLIAM "BILL" EXETER MATT

STRABONE
1521-481200-LA MESA Vote Centers 893 57 6.38 % 28 18
1521-481200-LA MESA Mail 893 545 61.03 % 196 255
1521-481200-LA MESA Total 893 602 67.41 % 224 273
1522-481500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1680 95 5.65 % 51 25
1522-481500-LA MESA Mail 1680 947 56.37 % 406 412
1522-481500-LA MESA Total 1680 1042 62.02 % 457 437
1523-481800-LA MESA Vote Centers 878 49 5.58 % 27 11
1523-481800-LA MESA Mail 878 403 45.90 % 147 195
1523-481800-LA MESA Total 878 452 51.48 % 174 206
1524-481900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1103 68 6.17 % 41 22
1524-481900-LA MESA Mail 1103 567 51.41 % 245 218
1524-481900-LA MESA Total 1103 635 57.57 % 286 240
1525-482100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1320 80 6.06 % 40 28
1525-482100-LA MESA Mail 1320 804 60.91 % 347 351
1525-482100-LA MESA Total 1320 884 66.97 % 387 379
1526-482600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1497 82 5.48 % 47 20
1526-482600-LA MESA Mail 1497 732 48.90 % 291 337
1526-482600-LA MESA Total 1497 814 54.38 % 338 357
1527-482610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1433 93 6.49 % 39 39
1527-482610-LA MESA Mail 1433 671 46.82 % 266 313
1527-482610-LA MESA Total 1433 764 53.31 % 305 352
1528-482800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1230 62 5.04 % 38 16
1528-482800-LA MESA Mail 1230 586 47.64 % 215 294
1528-482800-LA MESA Total 1230 648 52.68 % 253 310
1529-483000-LA MESA Vote Centers 1415 55 3.89 % 28 16
1529-483000-LA MESA Mail 1415 790 55.83 % 318 349
1529-483000-LA MESA Total 1415 845 59.72 % 346 365
1530-483100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1310 66 5.04 % 39 20
1530-483100-LA MESA Mail 1310 748 57.10 % 277 380
1530-483100-LA MESA Total 1310 814 62.14 % 316 400
1531-483200-LA MESA Vote Centers 36 0 0.00 %
1531-483200-LA MESA Mail 36 23 63.89 % 8 10
1531-483200-LA MESA Total 36 23 63.89 % 8 10
1532-483300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1527 104 6.81 % 57 25
1532-483300-LA MESA Mail 1527 815 53.37 % 305 388
1532-483300-LA MESA Total 1527 919 60.18 % 362 413
1533-483600-LA MESA Vote Centers 906 41 4.53 % 13 19
1533-483600-LA MESA Mail 906 403 44.48 % 124 198
1533-483600-LA MESA Total 906 444 49.01 % 137 217
1534-483610-LA MESA Vote Centers 1045 67 6.41 % 27 30
1534-483610-LA MESA Mail 1045 536 51.29 % 200 253
1534-483610-LA MESA Total 1045 603 57.70 % 227 283
1535-484300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1422 44 3.09 % 15 24
1535-484300-LA MESA Mail 1422 557 39.17 % 210 273
1535-484300-LA MESA Total 1422 601 42.26 % 225 297
1536-484800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1226 52 4.24 % 24 19
1536-484800-LA MESA Mail 1226 704 57.42 % 287 320
1536-484800-LA MESA Total 1226 756 61.66 % 311 339
1537-484900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1329 59 4.44 % 24 28
1537-484900-LA MESA Mail 1329 652 49.06 % 213 354
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 7 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 21 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA TREASURER Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) WILLIAM "BILL" EXETER MATT

STRABONE
1537-484900-LA MESA Total 1329 711 53.50 % 237 382
1538-484910-LA MESA Vote Centers 1445 64 4.43 % 31 23
1538-484910-LA MESA Mail 1445 740 51.21 % 240 394
1538-484910-LA MESA Total 1445 804 55.64 % 271 417
1539-485090-LA MESA Vote Centers 1000 54 5.40 % 20 23
1539-485090-LA MESA Mail 1000 641 64.10 % 246 286
1539-485090-LA MESA Total 1000 695 69.50 % 266 309
1540-485200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1568 80 5.10 % 41 29
1540-485200-LA MESA Mail 1568 903 57.59 % 323 451
1540-485200-LA MESA Total 1568 983 62.69 % 364 480
1541-485300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1157 53 4.58 % 31 15
1541-485300-LA MESA Mail 1157 675 58.34 % 269 322
1541-485300-LA MESA Total 1157 728 62.92 % 300 337
1542-485600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1131 53 4.69 % 33 14
1542-485600-LA MESA Mail 1131 750 66.31 % 347 315
1542-485600-LA MESA Total 1131 803 71.00 % 380 329
1543-485610-LA MESA Vote Centers 0 1 1
1543-485610-LA MESA Mail 0 0
1543-485610-LA MESA Total 0 1 1
1544-485620-LA MESA Vote Centers 4 0 0.00 %
1544-485620-LA MESA Mail 4 3 75.00 % 3
1544-485620-LA MESA Total 4 3 75.00 % 3
1545-485800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1472 64 4.35 % 37 17
1545-485800-LA MESA Mail 1472 770 52.31 % 304 373
1545-485800-LA MESA Total 1472 834 56.66 % 341 390
1546-485900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1238 52 4.20 % 30 14
1546-485900-LA MESA Mail 1238 686 55.41 % 248 343
1546-485900-LA MESA Total 1238 738 59.61 % 278 357
1547-486400-LA MESA Vote Centers 1419 53 3.74 % 24 24
1547-486400-LA MESA Mail 1419 854 60.18 % 306 450
1547-486400-LA MESA Total 1419 907 63.92 % 330 474
1548-486500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1451 67 4.62 % 26 26
1548-486500-LA MESA Mail 1451 693 47.76 % 271 345
1548-486500-LA MESA Total 1451 760 52.38 % 297 371
1549-486800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1483 78 5.26 % 37 25
1549-486800-LA MESA Mail 1483 804 54.21 % 308 375
1549-486800-LA MESA Total 1483 882 59.47 % 345 400
1550-486900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1541 76 4.93 % 47 18
1550-486900-LA MESA Mail 1541 876 56.85 % 299 469
1550-486900-LA MESA Total 1541 952 61.78 % 346 487
1551-487010-LA MESA Vote Centers 1082 55 5.08 % 32 15
1551-487010-LA MESA Mail 1082 541 50.00 % 206 252
1551-487010-LA MESA Total 1082 596 55.08 % 238 267
1552-487030-LA MESA Vote Centers 1605 48 2.99 % 24 14
1552-487030-LA MESA Mail 1605 641 39.94 % 248 285
1552-487030-LA MESA Total 1605 689 42.93 % 272 299
1553-487530-LA MESA Vote Centers 8 1 12.50 % 1
1553-487530-LA MESA Mail 8 3 37.50 % 3
1553-487530-LA MESA Total 8 4 50.00 % 4
8057-999057-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 8 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 22 of 105 ends

1 CITY OF LA MESA TREASURER Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) WILLIAM "BILL" EXETER MATT

STRABONE
8057-999057-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8057-999057-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8066-999066-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8659-999659-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8660-999660-VBM-AV Vote Centers 1 0 0.00 %
8660-999660-VBM-AV Mail 1 1 100.00 % 1
8660-999660-VBM-AV Total 1 1 100.00 % 1
8661-999661-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8661-999661-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8662-999662-VBM-AV Vote Centers 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Mail 2 0 0.00 %
8662-999662-VBM-AV Total 2 0 0.00 %
8663-999663-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8663-999663-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8664-999664-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8665-999665-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8666-999666-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8667-999667-VBM-AV Total 0 0
Total - Vote Centers 37857 1873 4.95 % 951 619
Total - Mail 37857 20064 53.00 % 7671 9566
Contest Total 37857 21937 57.95 % 8622 10185
Printed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Data Refreshed: Friday, December 9, 2022 10:15 AM Page 9 of 9 County of San Diego
2022 Statewide General Election
Precinct CanvassRPT - City La Mesa
November 8, 2022

Page 23 of 105 ends

DATE: December 13, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, AS AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY
BILL 361, AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL

AND/OR HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF LA MESA FOR THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING
JANUARY 1, 2023 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2023
The City Council, Board and Commission meetings returned to in-person meetings on April 12, 2022. On February 22, 2022, it was the consensus of the Council to permit hybrid meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of La Mesa. A city may meet remotely or use a combination of in-person/virtual (hybrid) platform under AB 361 during a declared state of emergency by the Governor via Government Code § 54953(e) et seq. The attached Resolution (Attachment A) would need to be adopted by Council to allow for hybrid meetings, in which Councilmembers and/or Board and Commission Members may choose to continue to attend meetings virtually while still allowing the public to attend in-person.

On September 28, 2021, the City Council was apprised of the latest Assembly Bill No. 361 (AB 361) signed by Governor Newsom allowing legislative bodies to continue to utilize remote/virtual platforms for meetings as long as one of the following three criteria was met:
 State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or
 For the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or
 The City Council has previously determined, by majority vote, that, as a result of the state of emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

Based on the above criteria, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-115 to allow continued remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of

Page 24 of 105 ends

La Mesa for the month of October 2021 at its September 28, 2021 meeting.

Subsequently, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2021-129, 2021-153, 2022- 006, 2022-018, 2022-020, 2022-028, 2022-042, 2022-063, 2022-083, 2022-087, 2022- 103, 2022-120, and 2022-125 to allow continued remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of La Mesa for the months of November and December 2021 and January through December 2022.

To continue meeting based on the parameters set forth in AB 361, the City Council must adopt subsequent resolutions each month prior to the expiration date of the previously adopted resolutions requesting the same. The adoption of the proposed Resolution is required to allow the City’s legislative bodies to hold hybrid meetings in which Councilmembers, Board Members, and Commissioners may choose to continue to participate virtually. Staff recommends adopting the attached draft resolution this evening to allow the hybrid meeting option for the month of January.

Attachment: A. Draft Resolution

Page 25 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, AS
AMENDED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 361, AND RE-AUTHORIZING THE

CONTINUED USE OF VIRTUAL AND/OR HYBRID MEETINGS OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF LA MESA FOR THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2023 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2023
WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor issued Executive Order Nos. N-08-21, N-25-20 and N-29-20, which suspended certain provisions of the Ralph M.

Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to conduct public meetings without strict compliance with the teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act;
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 361, which was signed into law on September 16, 2021, amended Government Code section 54953, to provide relief from the teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act under certain circumstances provided the legislative body makes certain findings;
WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, in accordance with the section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act, and the state of emergency remains in effect; and WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the California Department of Health and County of San Diego Public Health Services continue to recommended measures to promote social distancing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

1. That the Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the previously declared and existing state of emergency arising from the COVID-19 pandemic;

2. That the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members of the Council to meet safely in person, and further that local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing;

3. That the legislative bodies of the City may continue to conduct public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e); and

4. That the Council will reconsider the above findings within 30-days of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 26 of 105 ends

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 27 of 105 ends

DATE: December 13, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPOINTING THE EDCO REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL

SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
The Environmental Sustainability franchise waste and recycling hauler advisory member seat is vacant. EDCO, the City’s franchise waste and recycling hauler, nominated Fabian Rodriguez, Account Representative, as EDCO’s representative. This appointment only requires ratification from the Council.

Staff recommends the City Council approve the appointment and adopt the attached Resolution.

Attachments:

A. Resolution
B. EDCO’s Nomination Letter

Page 28 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPOINTING

THE EDCO REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

COMMISSION
___________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the franchise waste and recycling hauler advisory member seat of the City of La Mesa Environmental Sustainability Commission is vacant; and WHEREAS, EDCO, the City’s franchise waste and recycling hauler, has recommended the person below to the City Council for appointment to the La Mesa Environmental Sustainability Commission.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the following is hereby appointed as a member of the City of La Mesa Environmental Sustainability Commission, with their term to commence after the oath or affirmation of allegiance for public officers or employees is executed as required by Article XX, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California, and to expire when their successor is appointed and qualified:

Environmental Sustainability Commission:

Fabian Rodriguez is appointed as the EDCO representative.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 29 of 105 ends

6670 Federal Boulevard • Lemon Grove, California 91945
(619) 287-7555 • Fax: (619) 287-5242 • edcodisposal.com • Printed on Recycled Paper 12/01/22
City of La Mesa
Mayor and City Council
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
RE: EDCO Representative to the Environmental Sustainability Commission Dear Mayor and City Council,
On behalf of EDCO Waste & Recycling, Fabian Rodriguez, Account Representative has been appointed to the La Mesa Environmental Sustainability Commission as EDCO’s primary representative. He will replace Maggie Eggers, Senior Account Representative who was previously appointed.

Sincerely,
John Vorgeas
Director of Market Development

Page 30 of 105 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 13, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS 23-13 FOR CITYWIDE COMMUNITY

LITTER CLEANUP PROGRAM
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council approve a professional services agreement for Request for Proposals 23-13 for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program to I Love A Clean San Diego for $99,990?
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a professional services agreement for Request for Proposals 23-13 for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program to I Love A Clean San Diego for $99,990.

Fiscal Impact:

The Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program will be funded through American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) funding from account 215012-6450.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
 Foster community health by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving environmental quality
 Enhanced recreation and quality of life opportunities

Page 31 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 2 of 4
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 SW-3 Divert 75% Waste from Landfill – Maximize waste diversion (75% diversion rate) in the City through zero waste strategy and best practices.

BACKGROUND:

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA"). ARPA provided funding to local governments for numerous programs.

The City Council formed the City Council ARPA Ad-Hoc Subcommittee to consider eligible ARPA expenditures and provide recommendations to the entire City Council. The City Council ARPA Ad-Hoc Subcommittee discussed a desire to develop a communitydriven approach to litter pickup and removal through a contract with a nonprofit provider.

Based on a recommendation from the ARPA Ad-Hoc Subcommittee, on September 27, 2022, the City Council authorized $100,000 in ARPA funding for a citywide litter pickup and removal program.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program is to develop a community-driven approach to litter pickup and removal. The program would enable residents to participate in beautification efforts that would also serve to provide ongoing education regarding the importance of maintaining a clean community. The City Council approved the provision of these services through a contract with a nonprofit provider. The approved ARPA allocation provides for six cleanups per year over a period of five years. The scope of the Program includes the following key elements of each main task:

Planning Community Cleanup Events
 Schedule community cleanup events at the City’s direction  Organize six cleanup efforts per year for five years
 Mobilize groups of resident volunteers and facilitate online registration and communication before the events
 Prepare digital marketing and educational materials for social media, newsletter, and website
Day-of Community Cleanup Process
 Register volunteers at check-in table and sign waivers  Provide safety talk and informational presentation to raise awareness about the importance of clean streets

Page 32 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 3 of 4
 Supply appropriate clean up materials such as bags, buckets, grabbers, and gloves  Provide water for volunteers
 Take photos at the event
 Sort and dispose trash, recyclables, and hazardous waste properly  Provide total collected solid waste data and identify high frequency litter items (e.g. snack wrappers, cigarettes, etc.) after each cleanup
 Provide an annual summary report
A request for proposals (RFP) for the Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program was prepared and posted on the City’s PlanetBids website on October 31, 2022; the City received one proposal. Following review, ranking, and interview by the selection panel, I Love a Clean San Diego was determined to be highly qualified to provide the requested services.

I Love A Clean San Diego is a trusted leader in environmental education and community activation, with longstanding experience mobilizing residents to engage in meaningful action. Currently, I Love A Clean San Diego hosts community cleanup in partnership with the County of San Diego, City of San Diego’s Storm Water Department (Think Blue San Diego), City of Imperial Beach, and City of Chula Vista.

Among the cleanup events, the organization hosts two annual countywide cleanup events – Creek to Bay in April and Coastal Cleanup Day in September, each with 100 simultaneous cleanup sites and 6,000 volunteers across the county. In 2022, I Love A Clean San Diego successfully mobilized over 14,000 volunteers as part of 480 cleanups helping to remove over 137,5000 pounds of litter and debris throughout San Diego County. As a countywide organization, the organization aims to serve residents in all regions of San Diego County and has an established presence within La Mesa through youth presentations, outreach booths, and residential/commercial webinars.

The addition of community cleanups would enhance environmental awareness and stewardship amongst La Mesa residents and businesses. The consistent series of regular cleanups across five years will allow for amplified cumulative impact.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a professional services agreement for Request for Proposals 23-13 for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program to I Love A Clean San Diego for a total not-to-exceed amount of $99,990. Based on the schedule proposed by I Love a Clean San Diego, staff anticipates the program to begin in January 2023 and be completed by December 2027.

Page 33 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 4 of 4
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:

____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Carlo Tomaino
City Manager Assistant City Manager
____________________________
Michael Throne
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
____________________________
Hilary Ego
Environmental Program Manager
Attachments: Attachment A. Resolution
Attachment B. Professional Services Agreement

Page 34 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 23-13 FOR CITYWIDE COMMUNITY LITTER CLEANUP

PROGRAM TO I LOVE A CLEAN SAN DIEGO
WHEREAS, On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA") providing funding to local governments for numerous programs; WHEREAS, the City Council formed the City Council ARPA Ad-Hoc Subcommittee to consider eligible ARPA expenditures and provide recommendations to the entire City Council; WHEREAS, the City Council ARPA Ad-Hoc Subcommittee discussed a desire to develop a community-driven approach to litter pickup and removal through a contract with a nonprofit provider;
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2022, the proposed recommendation for the Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program expenditure for $100,000 was approved by City Council; WHEREAS, the purpose of the Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program is to develop a community-driven approach to litter pickup and removal through a contract with a nonprofit provider for six cleanups per year over a period of five years; WHEREAS, on October 31, 2022, the City requested proposals for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program Services;
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2022, one proposal was received and subsequently evaluated;
WHEREAS, I Love A Clean San Diego (ILACSD), was found to be the most highly qualified firm and was recommended for contract award based on their proposal and interview; and
WHEREAS, a final scope of work and fee were negotiated with ILACSD to provide Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program consulting services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to approve a professional services agreement for Request for Proposals 23-13 for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program Services to I Love A Clean San Diego for the total amount of $99,990.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 35 of 105 ends

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WEIGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WEIGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 36 of 105 ends

City of La Mesa

SERVICES AGREEMENT
Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program

Page 37 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ...............................

2. ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR............................................................................

3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR ..............................................

4. KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL .......................................................................................

5. CONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................

6. CITY REPRESENTATION ............................................................................................

7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY .............................................................................

8. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE......................................................................................

9. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR........................................................................

10. RECORDS.......................................................................................................................

11. METHOD OF COMPENSATION..................................................................................

12. ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED TO CITY.........................................................................

13. DESIGN CHANGES OR REVISIONS...........................................................................

14. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OUTSIDE SCOPE .............................................................

15. HOLD HARMLESS ........................................................................................................

16. INSURANCE...................................................................................................................

17. OWNERSHIP OF WORK...............................................................................................

18. ASSIGNABILITY ...........................................................................................................

19. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENTS ................................................................................

20. NOTICES.........................................................................................................................

21. DISPUTE RESOLUTION...............................................................................................

22. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE OR CONVENIENCE...................

23. BUSINESS LICENSE .....................................................................................................

24. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY...................................................................

25. INTEREST OF CONTRACTOR AND EMPLOYEES;.................................................

26. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................

27. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR..................................................................................

28. PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNIFICATION .................................................................

29. TIME................................................................................................................................

30. CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT.......................................................................................

31. NON-DISCLOSURE.......................................................................................................

32. SUBCONTRACTING .....................................................................................................

33. CHANGES.......................................................................................................................

34. JOB SITE SAFETY.........................................................................................................

35. PREVAILING WAGES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS.......................................

36. CONFLICT BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS ......................

37. DATE OF AGREEMENT...............................................................................................

38. SIGNATURES.................................................................................................................

Page 38 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
3 1. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Between the City of La Mesa and
I Love A Clean San Diego
for Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
This Agreement is entered into by City of La Mesa as of ____________, by and between the City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and I Love A Clean San Diego, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
WITNESSETH THAT:

WHEREAS, the City has adopted Resolution No. 2022- ;
WHEREAS, the City has need for professional services to perform citywide community litter cleanup program services and is willing to compensate Contractor for such services; WHEREAS, this Agreement is based on Request for Proposals 23-13; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Contractor to render certain technical and professional services in the providing of said professional services; and WHEREAS, Contractor is qualified to provide said professional services for citywide community litter cleanup program service.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:

2. ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR
The City hereby agrees to engage Contractor and Contractor hereby agrees to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement shall be for an initial term from the execution date of the Agreement through Wednesday, December 31, 2025 and may be renewed for an additional two one-year terms by mutual written consent of both parties. The City Manager shall have sole and exclusive right to exercise any options contained in this Agreement on behalf of the City.

3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR
Contractor shall commence performance of the Project upon execution of this Agreement by both parties. The term "Project" as used in this Agreement shall include all of the tasks and items listed and described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.

4. KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL
Contractor agrees to provide the services of Emily Nelson, Senior Director of Operations respectively for the full term of this contract. No substitutions will be made without prior written approval by the City. The City reserves the right to request specific qualifications for personnel substituted under this section.

Page 39 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
4 5. CONTRACTORS
Contractor will utilize the services of the following subcontractors during the course of this study:

None.

Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. No substitution of proposed subcontractors shall be made without prior written approval by the City.

6. CITY REPRESENTATION
The City Manager for the City of La Mesa, or its designated representative, shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and shall administer said Agreement on behalf of the City. This person shall hereinafter be referred to as the "City's Representative."

7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
The City will provide the Contractor, or cause to be provided with, the following documents, services and site information, at no charge to the Contractor.

A. See Exhibit "A"

8. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
Both Contractor and the City recognize that time is of the essence in the completion of this work and the following schedule is dependent upon timely actions by the Contractor and the City.

Accordingly, the Contractor shall complete all of the work outlined in Exhibit "A" and described in this Agreement in accordance with the following schedule:

TASK; TARGET DATE
A. See Exhibit "A"
The Contractor shall not be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or failure of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Contractor's work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, or governmental agencies.

9. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR
Final payment of fees shall be upon delivery of approved final documents. Progress payments shall be made based upon evidence that the work is progressing satisfactorily as determined by the City's Project Manager and substantiated with detailed invoices. The amount to be billed shall be based on the Contractor schedule of fees for professional services and the actual time required for each activity. The schedule of fees and estimated time for the project are as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.

Page 40 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
5 The total fee for professional services shall be billed on a flat-rate basis with a total amount not to exceed $99,990.00 as described on page 6 of Exhibit "A".

10. RECORDS
Contractor shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection audit of Contractor's time-andmaterial charges under this Agreement. Contractor shall make such records available to the City and to other public agencies responsible for approval, funding or auditing the project, during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records and they will be available only to the City or to public agencies involved with approval, funding or audit functions. Such records shall be maintained by the Contractor for three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement.

11. METHOD OF COMPENSATION
The Contractor shall invoice the City within 15 days of completion of specified tasks identified on page 6 of Exhibit “A.” Thereafter, the City shall compensate Contractor for satisfactory (to the City in its exclusive discretion) services performed within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of Contractor's invoice for the same. The Contractor shall provide documentation regarding timeand-material charges sufficient to meet normal auditing practice. Copies of the invoices for materials in excess of $500 and subcontractor charges shall be submitted with the request for periodic payment.

The City shall promptly review invoicing and notify Contractor of any objection thereto in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the invoice; absent such objection the invoice shall be deemed proper and acceptable.

In the event that any undisputed invoice is not paid within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice by the City, it shall commence bearing interest on the date that the invoice was rendered at the rate of 1% per month and the City agrees to pay all accrued interest, together with the charges for services rendered.

12. ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED TO CITY
The following items shall be delivered by the Contractor to the City of La Mesa:

QUANTITY; TARGET DATE
A. See Exhibit "A"

13. DESIGN CHANGES OR REVISIONS
No design changes or revisions will be required and no payment therefor will be made except pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. No extra compensation shall be paid the Contractor for revisions required by reason of omissions or errors by the Contractor in the preparation of the original document, plans, working drawings, or specifications. Changes to the scope of this Agreement shall be negotiated prior to commencement of extra work.

Page 41 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
6 14. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OUTSIDE SCOPE
Only after written authorization from the City, additional services that Contractor could provide, or cause to be provided, include the following:

A. Additional work related to the Project but not included in the Scope of Work.

B. Additional work caused by changes unrelated to the Scope of Work described herein.

Contractor will be compensated for Contractor time and direct personnel expenses as approved by the City.

15. HOLD HARMLESS
To the furthest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage), and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including reasonable attorney's fees and litigation expenses) that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Contractor, its principals, officers, employees, agents or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

16. INSURANCE
Throughout the life of this Agreement, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A:VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) authorized by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:

A. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Agreement) with limits of liability of not less than the following:

Page 42 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
7 o $1,000,000 per occurrence
o $2,000,000 general aggregate
B. COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

C. WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Should Contractor maintain insurance with broader coverage and/or limits of liability greater than those shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either:
(i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers: or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to City Manager or his/her designee, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form and shall name City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as an additional insured. Such policy(ies) of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. The Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall

Page 43 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
8 contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received by City and approved by City Manager or his/her designee prior to City’s execution of the Agreement and before work commences. Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.

If at any time during the life of this Agreement or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Agreement.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals, officers, employees, agents, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, Contractors, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors' certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

17. OWNERSHIP OF WORK
All finished or unfinished documents, studies, reports, computer files and materials prepared by Contractor and subcontractors under this Agreement shall be considered the property of the City and will be turned over to the City upon demand, but in any event, upon completion of the Project.

The Contractor shall be allowed to retain copies of documents for his permanent records, if desired.

Page 44 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
9 18. ASSIGNABILITY
Contractor shall not assign, delegate, or transfer this Agreement or any work hereunder, nor assign any monies due or to become due hereunder, except as expressly stated herein. In no event shall any contractual relation be created between any third party and the City without prior written consent of the City. A consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment.

19. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENTS
This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. There are no other agreements, expressed or implied, oral or written, except as set forth herein. This Agreement may be amended upon written mutual consent of both parties hereto.

Amendment requiring changes in compensation shall be subject to the City's change order procedures.

20. NOTICES
Notices and requests to the City or Contractor shall be delivered at the following addresses, either served personally on the designated representative or by U.S. Postal Service at the following addresses:

City:
• Director of Public Works/City Engineer
• City of La Mesa
• 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942
• (619) 463-6611
Contractor:
• Senior Director of Operations
• I Love A Clean San Diego
• 5797 Chesapeake Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92123 • (619) 291-0103

21. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The City shall require that all Contractors agree to submit any unresolved claims, counterclaims, disputes, controversies and other matters between them and the City or the Contractor and/or any subcontractors of any tier arising out of or relating to their agreement with the City or the breach thereof (“disputes”) first to mediation and then if not resolved, to non-binding arbitration prior to initiating suit or judicial proceeding.

Page 45 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
10 If applicable – As provided in Public Contract Code section 9204, any claim filed by the Contractor on a public works project shall be reviewed by the City with 45 days and a written statement will be provided to the Contractor identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Upon receipt of a claim, the City and the Contractor may, by mutual agreement, extend the time period or it may be extended to allow City Council approval. The Contractor shall include reasonable documentation to support the claim. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the City issues its written statement.

22. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE OR CONVENIENCE
If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner his obligations under this Agreement, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately by giving written notice to the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Contractor under this Agreement shall, at the option of the City, become its property and the Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder.

In addition to termination for cause, the City may terminate this Agreement for City’s convenience upon not less than fifteen (15) days written notice to Contractor. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement unless said notice provides otherwise. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in this paragraph for City’s convenience, the Contractor shall be required to provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, services, etc., prepared by the Contractor as may be requested by City and such work shall become City’s property upon payment to Contractor for the value of the work performed, less payments of compensation previously made.

Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the Agreement by the Contractor, and the City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Contractor is determined.

23. BUSINESS LICENSE
The Contractor, including all subcontractors, shall obtain a business license for work within the City of La Mesa pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Sections 6.08.010 through 6.08.240.

No payments shall be made to any Contractor until such business license has been obtained, and all fees paid therefor, by the Contractor and all subcontractors. Business license applications and information may be obtained from the Finance Department, City Hall, 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942-5502, (619) 667-1118 or online at cityoflamesa.us/buslic.

24. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY
No member of the governing body of the City and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out

Page 46 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
11 of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the Contractor shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.

25. INTEREST OF CONTRACTOR AND EMPLOYEES;

STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS
The Contractor covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in the study area or any parcels therein or any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his services hereunder. The Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. City may require Contractor to complete and submit a Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, in accordance with applicable law, to City Clerk.

26. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement.

27. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Contractor only insofar as the results of Contractor's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

28. PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNIFICATION
In the event that Contractor’s employee providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS of the City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employer and employee contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of the employee as well as for payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of the City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Contractor’s employees providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation and benefit including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contributions to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

29. TIME
Contractor shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

Page 47 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
12 30. CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT
Except as City may specify in writing, Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

31. NON-DISCLOSURE
The designs, plans, reports, investigations, materials and documents prepared or acquired by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement (including any duplicate copies kept by the Contractor) shall not be shown to any other public or private person or entity, except as authorized by the City.

The Contractor shall not disclose to any other public or private person or entity any information regarding the activities of the City except as authorized by the City.

32. SUBCONTRACTING
None of the services covered by the Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior consent of the City. The Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of his subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as he is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by him. The Contractor shall insert in each subcontract appropriate provisions requiring compliance with the labor standards provisions of this Agreement.

33. CHANGES
The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Services of the Contract to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Contractor's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Contractor shall be incorporated to this Contract.

34. JOB SITE SAFETY
The general or prime Contractor who is responsible for means, methods and procedures of the project shall be responsible for job site safety.

The prime contractor and all subcontractors of all tiers shall:

A. Be responsible for the safety of their respective employees as required by law.

B. Come under the jurisdiction and supervision of the general or prime contractor’s job site safety program.

C. Exercise reasonable care to avoid risk of injury to others as required by the professional standard of care.

35. PREVAILING WAGES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS

IF APPLICABLE

Page 48 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
13 A. No professional Contractor or subcontractor subject to the requirements of State of California’s prevailing wages may be awarded a contract, or contracted with, for a public works project (submitted on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

B. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

36. CONFLICT BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and any documents incorporated by reference in this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall supersede those contained in any such document incorporated by reference.

37. DATE OF AGREEMENT
The date of this Agreement shall be the date it shall have been signed by a duly authorized representative of City.

38. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have executed the Agreement.

I Love A Clean San Diego
By: _________________________________
Emily Nelson, Senior Director of Operations
Date: _____________

CITY OF LA MESA,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Dr. Mark Arapostathis, Mayor
Date: _____________

Page 49 of 105 ends

Services Agreement #2023-SA-010
Title: Citywide Community Litter Cleanup Program
14 By: _________________________________
Greg Humora, City Manager
Date: _____________
By: _________________________________
Michael Throne, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date: _____________

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: _________________________________

CITY ATTORNEY
Attachment: Exhibit A – Proposal and Fee Schedule
Exhibit B – Scope of Work

Page 50 of 105 ends

I Love A Clean San Diego
PROPOSAL PACKET, RFP 23-13

CITYWIDE COMMUNITY LITTER CLEANUP PROGRAM SERVICES

INFORMATION STATEMENT
Legal Name of Organization: I Love A Clean San Diego County, Inc.

Date Established: 1954
Legal Status, i.e., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship: 501(c)(3) Officers/Owners of Organization:

Name:Summer Haines Title: President, Board of Directors Name: Steve Morris Title: Executive Director
Number of Employees: Permanent – Full Time: 21 Part Time: 10 Business Address: 5797 Chesapeake Court, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92123
Contact Information:

Main Line: (619) 291-0103
[email protected]
Point of Contact: Emily Nelson, Senior Director of Operations [email protected]
Direct Line: (619) 704-2779
Organization Bank Name:

Branch: Torrey Pines Bank
Address: 9280 Clairemont Mesa Blvd, San Diego, CA 92123 Contact Name: Carmine A. Hedrick, (858) 523-4688
The City of La Mesa reserves the right to perform a credit check on your organization to obtain information regarding your organization’s financial stability.

Are you or your organization currently engaged or involved in any litigation over the proprietary rights or patent rights for the software or services to be used for the City of La Mesa? ___No__________________ If yes, please attach explanation.

EXHIBIT A

Page 51 of 105 ends

STATEMENT OF INTEREST
(250 words or less describing why your company has an interest in this project and why it would be the City of La Mesa’s best choice)
I Love A Clean San Diego (ILACSD) is a trusted leader in environmental education and community activation, with longstanding experience mobilizing residents to engage in meaningful action. Prior to COVID-19, ILACSD annually organized 285 cleanups with 35,000 volunteers removing 348,000+ pounds of debris. ILACSD is rebuilding a full calendar of events; to date in 2022, ILACSD mobilized over 14,000 volunteers through 480 cleanups, removing 137,500 pounds of debris throughout San Diego County.

As a countywide organization, ILACSD aims to serve residents in all regions of San Diego County. ILACSD has an established presence within La Mesa through youth presentations, outreach booths, and residential/commercial webinars. The addition of community cleanups as an avenue for activation would enhance environmental awareness and stewardship amongst La Mesa residents and businesses. The consistent series of regular cleanups across five years will allow for amplified cumulative impact and is highly attractive to ILACSD as a long-term investment in the community. ILACSD is uniquely positioned to meet all community cleanup needs for the City of La Mesa based on past experience, existing resources, specific qualifications, and local relevancy.

Community cleanups hosted by ILACSD not only immediately improve environmental health, but also enrich residents’ mental and physical health through social connection, positive outdoor experiences, and benefits of volunteering. This civic engagement creates community pride and deepens commitment to mindful consumption and proper disposal.

The combination of ILACSD’s expertise and the City of La Mesa’s nuanced knowledge of residents and neighborhoods will magnify the city’s prioritization of environmental stewardship.

Page 52 of 105 ends

STATEMENT OF COMPANY BACKGROUND AND PHILOSOPHY
(250 words or less)
Founded in 1954, ILACSD has exceled at activating volunteers across San Diego County for over 68 years and is the premier organization for community cleanups and environmental education in inland and coastal communities. ILACSD engages local partners to create a zero waste, litter free, and environmentally engaged San Diego region.

ILACSD is unique from other local nonprofits due to our apolitical stance, countywide reach, and focus on inland communities due to their direct link to ocean and environmental health. ILACSD’s efforts are centered on informing, inspiring, and empowering local residents in their understanding of environmental issues and capacity to adjust daily habits towards a sustainable lifestyle. ILACSD also partners with government agencies, corporate entities, and local champions in these efforts. All staff and board aim to live zero waste practices in their personal lives as well as in ILACSD’s internal operations.

When coordinating cleanup events, ILACSD strategically selects dates and locations to maximize registration and access across communities. For example, ILACSD collects input on viable locations from local partners, communicates public transportation options to volunteers, and chooses locations with safe and navigable access for volunteers of various mobility levels. Cleanup schedules are designed to engage all parts of a community, often alternating locations with regularity.

Page 53 of 105 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
(To match those required)
Must be a designated nonprofit organization
I Love A Clean San Diego is a 501(c)(3), tax ID 95-2566791.

Demonstrate successful completion of community cleanups in partnership with San Diego regional jurisdictions
ILACSD has engaged 272,683 volunteers over the last ten years and hosted over 2,076 cleanups throughout San Diego County, focusing on both inland and coastal regions. In the last ten years, these cleanup efforts diverted over 3 million pounds of litter and debris from the Pacific Ocean. Cleanups occur throughout all of San Diego’s watersheds and communities. Currently, ILACSD hosts community cleanups in partnership with the following agencies: County of San Diego, City of San Diego’s Storm Water Department (Think Blue San Diego), City of Imperial Beach, and City of Chula Vista. Among the cleanup events, ILACSD hosts two annual countywide cleanup events – Creek to Bay in April and Coastal Cleanup Day in September, each with 100 simultaneous cleanup sites and 6,000 volunteers across the county.

ILACSD has experience in creating event priorities, goals, identifying cleanup locations, delivering events on time and up to stakeholder standards, and reporting impact to government agencies. ILACSD manages a robust volunteer database, which includes collecting volunteer registrations, sharing event and location details, and other important information such as community service hours. In the volunteer database, Community Hub, volunteers create a profile for all ILACSD events and register in one place. ILACSD staff recruit and correspond with interested volunteers and community groups, and have tracked trends and effectiveness of outreach methods. In 2022 to date, ILACSD has successfully mobilized over 14,000 volunteers as part of 480 cleanups in 2022 helping to remove over 137,500 pounds of litter and debris throughout San Diego County.

Have experience with planning and facilitating day-of community cleanup events ILACSD prides itself on its turn-key cleanup events with seamless participation for volunteers and transformational beautification efforts. ILACSD currently hosts an average of 3-6 community cleanups per month. ILACSD selects cleanup site locations based on community needs and in partnership with the City of La Mesa with a focus on local engagement and outreach efforts. Cleanups can be hosted in parks, canyons, or urban areas as street sweeps.

ILACSD’s reputation as a leader in volunteer recruitment and community organizing is based on a proven record of successful events across 68 years. To

Page 54 of 105 ends

run effective cleanup events, ILACSD utilizes its longstanding experience and iterative improvements, maintains and develops partnerships, and targets outreach to promote events. ILACSD selects suitable cleanup sites based on applied experience and suggestions from local stakeholders, including city staff.

ILACSD identifies sites based on accessibility, walkability, parking, restrooms, and type and amount of litter or trash. ILACSD permits for the site location and conducts site visits as needed. ILACSD partners with hauling companies for dumpsters as needed and to properly process trash, recyclables, household hazardous waste, and organic waste.

ILACSD creates marketing materials and promotes each event through social media channels and e-newsletters leading up to the event (current subscription over 30,000). ILACSD engages current volunteers while recruiting new volunteers through targeted outreach, including to community stakeholders, college clubs and sororities, teachers, students, local religious groups, businesses, and more. Marketing may also include paid digital ads, flyering, and staff presentations at community meetings. Each cleanup has a separate event page on the www.cleansd.org calendar to direct interested volunteers to register.

ILACSD facilitates all day-of logistics, including checking in volunteers with safety waivers; providing and distributing water, cleanup supplies, and tools; conducting a safety and informational speech; providing community service verification to volunteers; and properly disposing of collected refuse. ILACSD provides reusable work gloves, buckets, and grabbers during each event. The kickoff speech includes watershed education, recycling education, future cleanup event promotion, and safety measures specific to each cleanup location. ILACSD staff take photos of the event, note high-frequency litter trends, and report on the total impact from the day. ILACSD staff provide comprehensive support in every step of the volunteer experience.

Must be available to work with City staff during the completion of the Scope of Work ILACSD employs a team of over 30 staff. The office is located in Kearny Mesa, with a hybrid workforce available for in-person and/or virtual meetings with City of La Mesa staff. ILACSD staff are available for communications Monday-Friday from 9am-5pm unless otherwise arranged and host public events MondaySaturday. ILACSD has a proven record of working effectively with numerous local jurisdictions, including the City of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa, City of Encinitas, City of Vista, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and others.

Page 55 of 105 ends

COST PROPOSAL
The flat rate for each cleanup is as follows:

Community Cleanups
Year Unit Cost # Cleanups Total Annual Cost
2023 $ 3,200.00 6 $ 19,200.00
2024 $ 3,200.00 6 $ 19,200.00
2025 $ 3,360.00 6 $ 20,160.00
2026 $ 3,360.00 6 $ 20,160.00
2027 $ 3,545.00 6 $ 21,270.00
TOTAL: $ 99,990.00
Cost is inclusive of planning event logistics; coordinating with partners; volunteer recruitment, registration, and stewardship; outreach and marketing; follow-up communications; and reporting. Marketing will include a variety of efforts across the cleanup series, and may include targeted social media, newsletters, community calendars, direct email, flyering, paid digital advertising, outdoor advertising, print media, and/or other efforts. Estimated cost breakdown per cleanup included below:
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Approx. Time Per
Cleanup Hours
Hourly
Rate Total
Hourly
Rate Total
Hourly
Rate Total
Hourly
Rate Total
Hourly
Rate Total
Cleanup Coordination &
Marketing 23 $76 $1,748 $76 $1,748 $80 $1,840 $80 $1,840 $84 $1,932 Day-of Cleanup
Facilitation 10 $76 $760 $76 $760 $80 $800 $80 $800 $84 $840 Admin (reporting,
invoicing, tracking, meet
w/City, etc.) 5 $76 $380 $76 $380 $80 $400 $80 $400 $84 $420 Approx. Materials Per
Cleanup Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost
Event Supplies & Mileage n/a $177 n/a $177 n/a $180 n/a $180 n/a $195 Marketing Expenses n/a $135 n/a $135 n/a $140 n/a $140 n/a $158 TOTAL $3,200 $3,200 $3,360 $3,360 $3,545

Page 56 of 105 ends

CONTRACT EXPERIENCE – REFERENCES
(List most recent experience first and specifically include any government agency experience – List any additional on separate sheet)
Company Name County of San Diego Watershed Protection Program Address 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 410
City San Diego
State CA
Zip 92123
Phone (858) 694-2212
Fax (858) 694-3597
Email [email protected]
Contact Name Nick del Valle
Contact Phone (858) 692-7806
Company Name City of San Diego Stormwater Department (Think Blue) Address 9370 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 100
City San Diego
State CA
Zip 92123
Phone 619-235-1000
Fax n/a
Email [email protected]
Contact Name Mariah Mills
Contact Phone Main Line: (858) 541-4341 Cell: (619) 889-0029 Company Name City of Imperial Beach
Address 495 10th Street
City Imperial Beach
State CA
Zip 91932
Phone (619) 628-1370
Fax (619) 429-4861
Email [email protected]
Contact Name Wbaldo Arellano
Contact Phone (619) 424-4095

Page 57 of 105 ends

EXHIBIT B

SCOPE OF WORK
A. SCOPE OF REQUIRED SERVICES
The nonprofit partner will perform the tasks below:

Planning Community Cleanup Events:
• Schedule community cleanup events at the City’s direction • Organize six cleanup efforts per year for five years
• Mobilize groups of resident volunteers and facilitate online registration and communication before the events
• Prepare digital marketing and educational materials for social media, newsletter, and website
Day-of Community Cleanup Process:
• Register volunteers at check-in table and sign waivers • Provide safety talk and informational presentation to raise awareness about the importance of clean streets
• Supply appropriate clean up materials such as bags, buckets, grabbers, and gloves • Provide water for volunteers
• Take photos at the event
• Sort and dispose trash, recyclables, and hazardous waste properly • Provide total collected solid waste data and identify high frequency litter items (e.g. snack wrappers, cigarettes, etc.) after each cleanup
• Provide summary report once a year

Page 58 of 105 ends

Page 59 of 105 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 13, 2022
SUBJECT: Approving Resolutions to Authorize Task Order Change Orders to Parsons for Staff Augmentation
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issue:

Should the City Council approve resolutions to authorize task order change orders to Parsons for staff augmentation in amounts of $54,575 and $62,083? Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolutions authorizing task order change orders to Parsons for staff augmentation. The change orders are in amounts of $54,575 and $62,083.

Fiscal Impact:

These change orders will be paid out of existing available funds from accounts 4141-6430, 3201-6430 and 3106-6430.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services
BACKGROUND:

The City of La Mesa like many other local businesses and agencies is currently facing staffing shortages. While the recruitment and search for two full time engineers is continuing, there is a need for the City to continue to provide these services.

In April 2018, the City advertised a request for qualifications for its as-needed engineering consultant services. Parsons was selected as one of the qualified firms to provide staff augmentation. Parsons has satisfactorily performed such services in the past and they are the recommended consultant to assist with the current engineering division workload until the vacant positions within the division are filled.

Page 60 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13,2022
Page: 2 of 2
The City’s Municipal Code and Administrative Instruction F-13 require the City Council’s approval for change orders that would result in total contract amount to exceed $50,000.

DISCUSSION:

On July 12, 2022, a task order to hire an assistant engineer to help with Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) for an amount of $45,188 was issued covering a contract period of approximately five months. The City desires to extend this contract for an additional five months. The change order for this service is $54,575 resulting in a total contract amount of $99,763.

On September 14, 2022, a task order to hire a traffic engineer to assist with traffic engineering inquiries and provide customer service to the residents for an amount of $44,345 was issued covering a contract period of approximately three months. The City desires to extend this contract for an additional six months. The change order for this service is $62,083 resulting in a total contract amount of $106,428.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolutions authorizing task order change orders to Parsons for staff augmentation. The change orders are in amounts of $54,575 and $62,083.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne
City Manager Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments: A- Resolution for Assistant Engineer
B- Resolution for Traffic Engineer

Page 61 of 105 ends

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PARSONS TASK ORDER 6 FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE AN

ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa continues to improve high quality municipal services; WHEREAS, Parsons was selected to provide Staff Augmentation Services during 2018 consultant selections for as-needed professional services for a period of five years; WHEREAS, the City issued Task Order 6 to Parsons to provide an assistant engineer to help with staff shortages and to maintain customer service; WHEREAS, the City desires to continue this service; and WHEREAS, the City’s Municipal Code and Administrative Instruction F-13 require the City Council’s approval for change orders that would result in total contract amount to exceed $50,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and is instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City, Contract Change Order No. 1 to Task Order 6 for staff augmentation, for an amount of $54,575 and modifying the task order amount to $99,763. Said contract change order is on file in the City Clerk Department.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the 13th of December 2022 and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 62 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PARSONS TASK ORDER 7 FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE A TRAFFIC

ENGINEER
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa continues to improve high quality municipal services; WHEREAS, Parsons was selected to provide Staff Augmentation Services during 2018 consultant selections for as-needed professional services for a period of five years; WHEREAS, the City issued Task Order 7 to Parsons to provide a traffic engineer to help with staff shortages and to maintain customer service;
WHEREAS, the City desires to continue this service; and WHEREAS, the City’s Municipal Code and Administrative Instruction F-13 require the City Council’s approval for change orders that would result in total contract amount to exceed $50,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and is instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City, Contract Change Order No. 1 to Task Order 7 for staff augmentation, for an amount of $62,083 and modifying the task order amount to $106,428. Said contract change order is on file in the City Clerk Department.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 63 of 105 ends

Page 64 of 105 ends

Page 65 of 105 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 13, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 23-01, EL CAJON
BLVD. AND JESSIE AVE. TRAFFIC SAFETY

IMPROVEMENTS AND AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SELECT ELECTRIC,
INC.

ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa accept Bid 23-01, El Cajon Blvd. and Jessie Ave.

Traffic Safety Improvements and award a construction contract to Select Electric, Inc. for $420,865.

Recommendation:

Adopt the attached resolution accepting Bid 23-01, El Cajon Blvd. and Jessie Ave. Traffic Safety Improvements and awarding a construction contract to Select Electric, Inc. for $420,865.

Fiscal Impact:

Funds for the project are available in Capital Improvement Project account 30220BOT. No general fund money will be used for this project.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services
 Effective and efficient traffic circulation and transportation Environmental Review:

The project was issued a Categorical Exemption-Exclusion determination according to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act.

Page 66 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 T-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure – Encourage active transportation options through planning and development of safe active transportation infrastructure and facilities in the City.

BACKGROUND:

On September 25, 2018, the City of La Mesa approved a resolution adopting a Vision Zero Plan. The Plan’s goal is to reduce traffic fatalities to zero by prioritizing safety within infrastructure projects and combining education and enforcement practices to achieve this goal. Implementation of certain tools including safe and complete streets design criteria advance this plan. This project is consistent with the goals of the Vision Zero Plan.

City staff was successful in obtaining grant funding in an amount of $438,000 through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The grant is intended to serve as a comprehensive framework for reducing fatalities and serious injuries on public roads.

This grant aligns with the City’s Vision Zero Plan.

In alignment with the grant program goals, the El Cajon Blvd. and Jessie Ave. Traffic Safety Improvements involves the installation of a pedestrian high-intensity activated crosswalk beacon (HAWK) signal at the intersection of El Cajon Boulevard and Jessie Avenue. This project also includes curb extensions to help reduce the pedestrian crossing distance of El Cajon Boulevard at Jessie Avenue. The project will increase the safety of pedestrians and further support the implementation of the City’s Vision Zero Plan. This location was selected based on its high pedestrian activity and prior pedestrian related collision history. Engineering has prepared an informational handout about the new type of crosswalk beacon (see attachment) and will be sending it to adjacent property owners and posting on the city’s website.

DISCUSSION:

On November 8, 2022, a notice inviting bids was advertised and bid documents were distributed to 20 plan holders. On November 22, three (3) bids were received electronically. The apparent responsive, responsible low bidder was identified as Select Electric, Inc. with a total base bid price of $420,865. A bid results summary is shown in Attachment B.

The engineer’s estimate for the project was $438,000.

Contract time for completion of the project is 25 working days. The work is expected to begin in March of 2023 and be completed by May of 2023.

Page 67 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Bid 23- 01, El Cajon Blvd. and Jessie Ave. Traffic Safety Improvements and awarding a construction contract to Select Electric, Inc. for $420,865.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne
City Manager Director of Public Works
Attachments: A – Resolution – Bid Award to Select Electric, Inc.

B – Bid Results Tabulation
C - Public Outreach Brochure

Page 68 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
ACCEPTING BID 23-01, EL CAJON BOULEVARD AND JESSIE AVENUE

TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SELECT ELECTRIC, INC.

WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa continues to improve high quality municipal services and revitalize neighborhoods and corridors;
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2018, the City adopted a Vision Zero Plan to reduce traffic fatalities to zero and prioritize safety within infrastructure projects and combine education and enforcement practices to achieve this goal;
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa secured Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant Funding in the amount of $438,000 dollars for the installation a high-intensity activated crosswalk beacon (HAWK) signal and curb extensions at the intersection of El Cajon Boulevard and Jessie Avenue;
WHEREAS, the project under consideration is consistent with the City’s Vision Zero Plan;
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Bid 23-01 was advertised and low bid selection was based on the lowest responsive, responsible base bid;
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2022, the City received three bids and Select Electric, Inc. was the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder with a total base bid amount of $420,865; and WHEREAS, the total bid is below the engineer’s estimate and within the City’s budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:

Select Electric, Inc’s. base bid in the amount of $420,865 for Bid 23-01, El Cajon Blvd. and Jessie Ave. Traffic Safety Improvements was determined to be the lowest, responsive, responsible bid. Said bid is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorized to accept and execute a construction contract with Select Electric, Inc. to perform items of work at the prices set forth in said bid for a total bid award amount of $420,865.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is authorized to approve the substitution of subcontractors.

Page 69 of 105 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 70 of 105 ends

BID 23-01 El Cajon Blvd and Jessie Ave Traffic Safety Improvements Bidders Base Bid
1 Select Electric, Inc. $420,865.00
2 Aster Construction Services $484,974.65
3 LC Paving and Sealing, Inc. $505,813.30
Engineer's Estimate $438,000.00
Bid Results Tabulation
All bids will be compared on the basis of the BASE BID.

Page 71 of 105 ends

HAWK SIGNALS IN LA MESA
The City of La Mesa is installing its first HAWK signal at the intersection of Jessie Ave and La Mesa Blvd. This brochure contains important information on how to use the new HAWK signal system.

The HAWK signal system is a signal beacon designed to help pedestrians safely cross busy streets.
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
Phone: 619.463.6611

Page 72 of 105 ends

2 3

HOW IS A HAWK SIGNAL DIFFERENT?
Similar to conventional traffic signals, the HAWK signal provides pedestrians with an indication notifying them when to cross the street. Unlike conventional traffic signals, the HAWK is only operational when activated by pedestrians and rests in a dormant state. While in its dormant state, the HAWK displays a “Don’t Walk” indication for pedestrian crossing until activated by a pedestrian.

When a pedestrian presses the button, approaching drivers will see a flashing yellow signal indicating they should reduce their speed and prepare to stop for pedestrians. The signal then changes to a solid yellow, then a solid red-light indicating drivers to stop. Once the dual red lights begin alternately flashing, motorists must stop for pedestrians but are permitted to proceed if there are no pedestrians in the crosswalk

ACCESSIBILITY FOR THE DISABLED
HAWK signals feature Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) equipment that provide disabled pedestrians with information regarding the signal. An audible message and vibrating arrow button announce when the WALK signal is on.

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
The City of La Mesa places a high priority on pedestrian safety and is focusing its efforts on high volume roadways. California law requires motorists to legally stop and give the right of way to pedestrians within crosswalks
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Traffic Safety Facts 2015 Data: Pedestrians”, DOT HS 812 375 (Washington, DC:

February 2017).. Accessible at:
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812375.

Source: Fatality analysis Reporting System (FARS) 2006-2014 Final File, 2015 Annual Report File (ARF).

HAWK LOCATION
El Cajon Blvd Jessie Ave 73rd St Comanche Dr Parks Ave Williams Ave Keeney St Mohawk St
La Mesita Pl

Page 73 of 105 ends

Page 74 of 105 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 13, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA

MESA APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIFIED

GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION LOCAL

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS
FROM BUDGET ACT 2022-2023 TO FUND THE SCHOOL

AND PARKS MOBILITY ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT; ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IF
AWARDED; AND APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY

AMENDMENTS
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an application through the State Department of Parks and Recreation for the Local Assistance Specified Grant Program for the School and Park Mobility Access Improvements Project; accepting and appropriating funds if awarded; and appointing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments? Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an application through the State Department of Parks and Recreation for the Local Assistance Specified Grant Program for the School and Park Mobility Access Improvements Project; accepting and appropriating funds if awarded; and appointing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments.

Fiscal Impact:

The total estimated grant amount for the School and Park Mobility Access Improvements Project is $500,000. If approved, this amount will be appropriated in the City Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Page 75 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Safe community
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services
 Enhanced recreation and quality of life opportunities  Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 T-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure – Encourage active transportation options through planning and development of safe active transportation infrastructure and facilities in the City.

BACKGROUND:

This specified grant originated from a line item in the State of California Budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 at the request of Assembly Member Dr. Akilah Weber. The grant is intended to provide safe routes to schools and parks similar to Active Transportation Program (ATP). The grant encourages walking and biking safely by providing sidewalks and bike lanes.

The grant may be applied to any phase of the project including project planning, design, and construction.

DISCUSSION:

This grant program represents an opportunity to fund a transportation study and prepare master plans for Tower Street and Hoffman Drive.

Tower Street from 70th Street to the City Limit serves Rolando Elementary School and Sunshine Park. Tower Street is substantially under-improved and there is no continuous sidewalk or bike lane. A combination of private improvements and a lack of proper transportation planning and right of way makes it very challenging to provide the required facilities. The Study will examine the existing conditions and provide a plan as to how to proceed to achieve the end goal of safe modes of transportation.

Hoffman Drive spans from Massachusetts Avenue to the City Limit and is located at the heart of Vista La Mesa neighborhood. It is designated as a local collector street. This local collector street also serves as a main access road to Vista La Mesa Academy and Vista La Mesa Park. The condition of the road is very similar to Tower Street with no defined road right of way and any active transportation improvements.

If the application is successful the master planning, environmental, design, and

Page 76 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
construction efforts of the project can be delivered upon appropriation of the funds by the State and execution of a grant contract. The projects must be completed no later than December 31, 2025
CONCLUSION:

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne
City Manager Director of Public Works
Attachments: A. Resolution

Page 77 of 105 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPROVING

APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION LOCAL

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS FROM BUDGET ACT 2022-2023 TO FUND THE SCHOOL AND PARK MOBILITY ACCESS

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS; APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENTS FOR

THE PROJECT
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of a grant to the City of La Mesa, setting up necessary procedures governing application; WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City hereby approves the filing of the project application for specified grant project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby certifies that it has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing specified grant funds, sufficient funds, including those provided by this grant, to complete the project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby certifies that it has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Procedural Guide.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for completion of the project scope.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City, if awarded the grant(s), hereby appropriates the funds in a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in the amounts of $500,000 for the School and Park Mobility Access Improvements Project, provided however, that if the actual revenue received from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to the amount actually received.

Page 78 of 105 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13
th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 79 of 105 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
and the CITY OF LA MESA SUCCESSOR AGENCY from the
CITY MANAGER and DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: December 13, 2022
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING (I) A RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE TWELVEMONTH PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 AND (II) A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S RECOGNIZED

OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE
TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager and Finance
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelvemonth period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024? Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024? Recommendation:

That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024; and
That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024

Page 80 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 2 of 4
Fiscal Impact:

The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) 23-24 identifies all payment obligations of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency), the anticipated timeframes for payment of the obligations, and the funding sources from which the payments are made. Of note, the ROPS 23-24 includes as Item #5 on the ROPS Detail as an enforceable obligation of the Successor Agency the City’s carryback loan to the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency for its purchase of real property from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, among other items. This Item was previously approved by the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board to the La Mesa Successor Agency, and the California Department of Finance (Department of Finance) on a prior ROPS as an “enforceable obligation”.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Dissolution Law governing the wind-down of the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency’s (Former RDA) affairs requires the Successor Agency to prepare an Administrative Budget before each fiscal year period and to submit the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board (defined below) for approval. The Dissolution Law further requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (County Auditor-Controller) for each 6-month period in the fiscal year the administrative cost estimates from its approved Administrative Budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) established for the Successor Agency. The administrative cost estimates paid with RPTTF for the fiscal year is also known as Administrative Cost Allowance. Based on a thorough review of past and present administrative expenses and responsibilities, the Successor Agency is requesting for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 a total amount of $134,990 as its Administrative Cost Allowance to pay its estimated administrative costs that are detailed in the proposed Administrative Budget.

In addition, the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period and to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (ROPS 23-24), after approval by the Oversight Board (defined below), to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2023. The ROPS serves as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source. The County Auditor-Controller is responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues from the RPTTF sufficient to meet the

Page 81 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 3 of 4
requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period. In this regard, RPTTF funds are paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency on January 2 and June 1 of each year to make payments on the approved ROPS. The Successor Agency has determined that it requires a total amount of $1,174,954 from the RPTTF for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 to meet the financial enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency listed on the ROPS 23-24. Payment obligations listed on the ROPS 23-24 include debt service payments for the AD98-1 Limited Obligation Refunding Bonds, required fees associated with such bonds, funding for the legal defense of the lawsuit filed by the San Diego Affordable Housing Coalition, funding for annual auditing services, payment to the City of the City’s carryback loan to the Former RDA for the Former RDA’s purchase of real property located at 8181 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California (commonly referred to as the “Old Police Station Site”) from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, and the Administrative Cost Allowance for the Successor Agency.

As a part of the ROPS 23-24, the Dissolution Law requires a reporting of cash balances for the prior period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 to determine the amount of unspent RPTTF funds received by the Successor Agency for payment obligations listed on the ROPS 20-21 that can be allocated and used toward payment obligations listed on the ROPS 23-24. A separate reconciliation of the ROPS 20-21 covering the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 has determined an unaudited total amount of $28,144 in unspent RPTTF funds which, if concurred by the Department of Finance, will be used by the Successor Agency to fund certain payment obligations listed on the ROPS 23-24, and therefore reduce the amount of RPTTF to be paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for the ROPS 23-

24. In 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (Oversight Board) was established pursuant to the Dissolution Law.

This Oversight Board oversees all successor agencies located in the County of San Diego, including the Successor Agency, and replaces by operation of law the previously constituted local oversight board of the Successor Agency. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are set forth in the Dissolution Law.

Pursuant to the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is obligated to prepare and submit the ROPS on forms provided by the Department of Finance. In this regard, the Successor Agency staff has included in both Resolution No. 2022-041 SA (i.e.

Section 3(vi)) and Resolution No. 2022-042 SA (i.e. Section 3(iv)) authorization and direction to the Executive Director or designee to revise the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget (if necessary), and make such changes and amendments as

Page 82 of 105 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 13, 2022
Page: 4 of 4
necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance. The Oversight Board meeting at which it will consider the Administrative Budget and the ROPS 23-24 is set for Thursday, January 19, 2023 and the deadline to submit the ROPS 23-24 to the Department of Finance is February 1, 2023.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the Successor Agency take the following actions:

Adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024; and
Adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (ROPS 23-24).

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:

____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Tammi J Royales
City Manager Director of Finance
Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2022-041 SA Approving the Administrative Budget B. Administrative Budget
C. Resolution No. 2022-042 SA Approving the ROPS 23-24
D. ROPS 23-24

Page 83 of 105 ends

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022–041 SA

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR
PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 (ROPS 23- 24 PERIOD) AND APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v.

Matosantos, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of paying, performing and enforcing the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies and expeditiously winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-005 on January 10, 2012, pursuant to Part 1.85 of AB 26, electing for the City to serve as the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Successor Agency”), and electing for the City to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions of the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Housing Successor”); and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved by operation of law and the Successor Agency and Housing Successor were established pursuant to AB 26; and
WHEREAS, AB 26 has since been amended by various assembly and senate bills enacted and signed by the Governor. AB 26 as amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Dissolution Law”; and
WHEREAS, in 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to

Page 84 of 105 ends

2 H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law; and WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare an administrative budget and submit the administrative budget to the Oversight Board for approval. The administrative budget shall include all of the following: (i) estimated amounts for Successor Agency administrative costs for the upcoming two 6-month fiscal periods; (ii) proposed sources of payment for Successor Agency administrative costs; and (iii) proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations services provided by the City or other entity; and WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(k) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) for each 6-month fiscal period the administrative cost estimates from its approved administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) established for the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, staff of the Successor Agency seeks the Successor Agency’s approval of the administrative budget for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (“Administrative Budget”), in the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting, and the Successor Agency’s authorization to submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its approval and to forward the information required by H&S Code Section 34177(k) to the County AuditorController; and WHEREAS, the Administrative Budget has been prepared in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law and is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law. As indicated in the Administrative Budget, the Successor Agency does not directly employ its own staff but relies on the employees and staff members of the City to perform its functions and operations required by the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, the proposed source of payment of the costs set forth in the Administrative Budget in the amount of $134,990 is property taxes from the County’s RPTTF established for the Successor Agency. These costs in the amount of $134,990 are listed as Item #15 on the proposed Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (“ROPS 23- 24”) for funding from RPTTF, which ROPS 23-24 is proposed to be considered by the

Page 85 of 105 ends

3 Successor Agency at this same meeting of the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency will submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the San Diego County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for review and approval; and
WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34179(f) of the Dissolution Law, all notices required by law for proposed actions of the Oversight Board will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website or the Oversight Board’s internet website; and WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law, written notice and information about all actions taken by the Oversight Board shall be provided to the Department of Finance as an approved Resolution by electronic means and in a manner of the Department of Finance’s choosing; except, however, the Oversight Board is not required, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1)(B), to submit the Oversight Board action approving the Administrative Budget to the Department of Finance for its approval; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the County Auditor-Controller and the State Controller’s Office and will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website. If desired by the Successor Agency and the Oversight Board, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the Department of Finance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) and (3) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2023 and January 2, 2024 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the approved ROPS 23-24 and for the administrative cost allowance for administrative costs set forth in the Administrative Budget; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Successor Agency approves the Administrative Budget for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.

Page 86 of 105 ends

4 Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its review and approval and concurrently submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the County Administrative Officer, the County AuditorController, and the Department of Finance; (ii) if desired by the Successor Agency or the Oversight Board, submit the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, and written notice of the Oversight Board’s approval of the Administrative Budget by Resolution, to the Department of Finance electronically pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law; (iii) submit a copy of the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, to the County Auditor-Controller and the State Controller’s Office; (iv) post the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (v) upon approval of the Oversight Board, submit to the County Auditor-Controller the administrative cost estimates from the Administrative Budget in the amount of $134,990 that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established for the Successor Agency; (vi) revise the Administrative Budget, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the Administrative Budget in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the Administrative Budget to the form or format as may be prescribed by the Department of Finance; and (vii) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.

Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

Section 5. The adoption of this Resolution is not intended to and shall not constitute a waiver by the Successor Agency of any constitutional, legal or equitable rights that the Successor Agency may have to challenge, through any administrative or judicial proceedings, the effectiveness and/or legality of all or any portion of the Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

Page 87 of 105 ends

5 AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022-041 SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 88 of 105 ends

Successor Agency to the La Mesa Redevelopment Agency
Agency Administrative Budget
ROPS 23-24
July - December
2023
January - June
2024
Total for Fiscal
Year 2023-2024

SALARIES AND BENEFITS
Salaries $29,520.00 $29,520.00 $59,040.00
Benefits $21,870.00 $21,870.00 $43,740.00
Total Salaries & Benefits $51,390.00 $51,390.00 $102,780.00

OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Materials, Services & Supplies
Cell Phone Allowance $95.00 $95.00 $190.00
Office Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Postage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Books, Subscriptions & Printing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Dept Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Advertising $250.00 $250.00 $500.00
Mileage $175.00 $175.00 $350.00
Professional & Specialized Services $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 Car Allowance $585.00 $585.00 $1,170.00
Misc Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Materials, Services & Supplies $16,010.00 $16,010.00 $32,020.00 Total Successor Agency Admin Allowance $67,495.00 $67,495.00 $134,990.00

Page 89 of 105 ends

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022–042 SA

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND

ADOPTING THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT
SCHEDULE (ROPS 23-24) FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR
PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 AND

APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v.

Page 90 of 105 ends

2 Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34171(h) of the Dissolution Law, “Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule” (“ROPS”) means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency for each fiscal year as provided in H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(3) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS shall be forward looking to the next one year in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(o); and
WHEREAS, according to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period. For each recognized obligation, the ROPS shall identify one or more of the following sources of payment: (i) Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds, (ii) bond proceeds, (iii) reserve balances, (iv) administrative cost allowance, (v) the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation or by the provisions of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, and (vi) other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived from the former Redevelopment Agency as approved by the Oversight Board in accordance with Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Dissolution Law that the ROPS serve as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source and that the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) will be responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues sufficient to meet the requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is required to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, after its approval and adoption by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2023; and

Page 91 of 105 ends

3 WHEREAS, the ROPS covering the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (“ROPS 23-24”) is presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting for review, approval, and adoption; and
WHEREAS, if approved and adopted by the Successor Agency, the ROPS 23-24 shall thereafter be submitted to the Oversight Board for review, approval, and adoption.

In this regard, H&S Code Sections 34177(l)(2)(B) and 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to submit a copy of the ROPS 23-24 to the San Diego County Administrative Officer (“County Administrative Officer”), the County AuditorController, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the ROPS 23-24 to the Oversight Board for approval; and WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(2)(C) of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23-24 shall be submitted to the County Auditor-Controller, the State Controller’s Office and the Department of Finance and shall be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website; and WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1)(A) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall submit a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 23-24 to the Department of Finance in the manner provided by the Department of Finance; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2023 and January 2, 2024 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the ROPS 23-24 and approved by the Department of Finance; and WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 23-24 is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 23-24 contains the schedules for payments on enforceable obligations required for the applicable fiscal year period and sources of funds for payments as required pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l) of the Dissolution Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS 23-24 as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board shall be submitted to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2023. Section 34177(o)(1) further provides that the Department of Finance shall make its determination of the enforceable obligations and the amounts and funding sources of the enforceable obligations no later than April 15, 2023 and that the Successor Agency may, within five (5) business days of the Department of Finance’s determination, request additional review by the Department of Finance and an opportunity to meet and confer on disputed items. In the event of a meet and confer and request for additional review, the Department of Finance shall notify the Successor Agency and the County

Page 92 of 105 ends

4 Auditor-Controller as to the outcome of its review at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of the first property tax distribution for that period (i.e. before June 1, 2023); and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Successor Agency approves and adopts the ROPS 23-24 for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.

Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) provide the ROPS 23-24 to the Oversight Board for review, approval, and adoption and concurrently submit a copy of the ROPS 23-24 to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance; (ii) submit the ROPS 23-24, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and to the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2023; (iii) submit a copy of the ROPS 23-24, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the State Controller’s Office and post the ROPS 23-24 on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (iv) revise the ROPS 23-24, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 23-24 to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 23- 24 in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 23- 24 to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance; (v) make other non-substantive changes and amendments to the ROPS 23-24 as may be approved by the Executive Director of the Successor Agency and its legal counsel; and (vi) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.

Page 93 of 105 ends

5 Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022-042 SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 94 of 105 ends

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) -
Summary Filed for the July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Period Successor Agency: La Mesa
County: San Diego
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
23-24A Total
(July -
December)
23-24B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS
23-24 Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 1,069,871 $ 105,083 $ 1,174,954 F RPTTF 1,002,376 37,588 1,039,964
G Administrative RPTTF 67,495 67,495 134,990
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,069,871 $ 105,083 $ 1,174,954 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date

ATTACHMENT D

Page 95 of 105 ends

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024

OB 2017-04
finding loan
was made for
legitimate
redevelopment
purposes and
approving
repayment
Fletcher
Pkwy
5,080,004 N $465,434 - - - $465,434 - $465,434 - - - - - $- 11 AD98-1 Bond
Fiscal Agent
Fees
Fees 06/24/
1998
09/30/2023 US Bank Fiscal Agent
fees as
required by
bond issuanceEnforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34171(d)(1)(A)
and
34171(d)(1)(E)
Alvarado
Creek
7,035 N $2,900 - - - - - $- - - - 2,900 - $2,900

Page 96 of 105 ends

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
23-24
Total
ROPS 23-24A (Jul - Dec)
22-23A
Total
ROPS 23-24B (Jan - Jun)
23-24B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
12 AD98-1
Annual
Disclosure
Fees
Fees 06/24/
1998
09/30/2023 Stradling,
Yocca,
Carlson
Annual
Disclosure
Fees as
required by
bond issuanceEnforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34171(d)(1)(A)
and
34171(d)(1)(E)
Alvarado
Creek
2,110 N $600 - - - - - $- - - - 600 - $600
15 Administrative
Cost
Allowance
Admin Costs 07/01/
2023
06/30/2024 Various Administrative
Cost
Allowance
under AB1X26
- See
Oversight
Board
Resolution
approving the
Administrative
Budget and
Administrative
Cost
Allowance
n/a 134,990 N $134,990 - - - - 67,495 $67,495 - - - - 67,495 $67,495 17 Defense of
Affordable
Housing
Coalition
Lawsuit
Litigation 07/30/
2013
06/30/2024 Kane,
Ballmer &
Berkman/
SA
Legal Defense
of Affordable
Housing
Coalition's
lawsuitEnforceable
Obligation per
HSC 34171(b)
and
34171(d)(1)(F)
Central/
Fletcher/
Alvarado
Creek
40,000 N $40,000 - - - 20,000 - $20,000 - - - 20,000 - $20,000 20 Deferred
Housing SetAside
Miscellaneous 06/30/
1994
06/30/2037 La Mesa
Housing
Successor
Agency
Asset
Fund
(Low/Mod
Income
Hsng
Asset
Fund)
Deferred Set
Aside amounts
owed to
Central Project
Area to be paid
from RPTTF -
Enforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34171(d)(1)(G)
and HSC
Central 0 N 0 - - - 0 - 0 - - - - - $-

Page 97 of 105 ends

Page 98 of 105 ends

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 20-21 Cash
Balances (07/01/20 -
06/30/21)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual
07/01/20) RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period
distribution amount.
522,450 358,729 2,913 C1: Amount held by Fiscal Agent per bond covenant. E1: $123,599.83 PPA (ROPS
17-18) per ROPS 20-21DOF Determination
letter dated 3/27/2020 PLUS $136,280 PPA
(ROPS 18-19) per DOF Determination letter
dated 3/27/21 PLUS $98,846 19-20 PPA. F1:

Cash on hand with Trustee. G1: $98,848 PPA
(ROPS 19-20) per ROPS 19-20
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/21) RPTTF
amount should tie to the ROPS 20-21 total
distribution from the County AuditorController
1,318,566 G2: ROPS 20-21A/B RPTTF Distributions
per DOF Determination letter dated
3/27/2021 and paid by County Aud/contrlr
3 Expenditures for ROPS 20-21 Enforceable
Obligations (Actual 06/30/21)
2,913 1,414,170 F3: Cash on hand applied by trustee to debt service payment. G3: Expenditures per
Audit Trail for FY 2020-2021.
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual
06/30/21) RPTTF amount retained should only include
the amounts distributed as reserve for future period(s) 522,450 358,729 C4: Amount held in reserve by fiscal agent per bond covenant. E4: $123,599.83 PPA
(ROPS 17-18 per ROPS 20-21 DOF
$123,600

Page 99 of 105 ends

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 20-21 Cash
Balances (07/01/20
- 06/30/21
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
5 ROPS 20-21 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 20-21
PPA form submitted to the CAC
No entry required
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance
(06/30/21) C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 -5) $- $- $- $- $-148
determination letter 3/27/20 allocated by DOF
to reduce the ROPS 20-21A RPTTF
Distribution plus $136,280 18-19 PPA plus
$98,846 19-20 PPA.
$28,144

Page 100 of 105 ends

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 22-23) -
Notes July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024
Item # Notes/Comments
3 5 On 12/7/17, OB approved Reso 2017-04 (i) finding per Section 34191.4(b)(1) that City's seller carryback loan provided to former RDA was for legitimate redevelopment purposes (ii) approving the loan as an EO of SA (iii) approving repayment of remaining principal balance of $6M of original Purchase Price from RPTTF as an EO to be listed on successive ROPS, and (iv) authorizing SA Exec Dir to include repayment on successive ROPS until the loan is repaid in full. On 1/23/18, DOF letter approved the loan and repayment of loan on the ROPS in outstanding principal balance of $5.3M.

Since Deferrals listed in Item A-20 have been repaid, all RPTTF can be applied as partial repayment of this Item on ROPS 23-24 toward the total debt obligation. For ROPS 23-24, Item A-5, SA estimates the permissible RPTTF payment amount of $465,434, calculated per the Section 34191.4(b) as the 50% increase in residual RPTTF paid to ATEs in FY 2012-2013 of $2,083,973 and residual RPTTF estimated to be paid to ATEs in current FY 2022-2023 of $3,014,840. 11 12 15
17 Funds required for defense of the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County v. City of La Mesa as Successor Agency to La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency et al. Litigation costs due to the filing of a lawsuit by the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County against several successor agencies alleging that unmet obligations of the former RDA pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA payable from RPTTF.

Costs relating to potential and pending litigation in connection with assets or obligations constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA and shall be payable from RPTTF funds, not as an administrative cost, pursuant to HSC Section 34171(b) and 34171(d)(1)(F) of the Dissolution Law. 20 21

Page 101 of 105 ends

DATE: December 13, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 2.73.010 OF THE LA

MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST THE NUMBER OF

COMMISSIONERS ON THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND

VETERANS COMMISSION
At the Council meeting of November 22, 2022, the Council unanimously approved the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance amending Section 2.73.010 of the La Mesa Municipal Code to adjust the number of commissioners on the Community Relations and Veterans Commission.

In November 2016, the Aging and Veteran Commission and the Human Relations Commissions were combined to create the Community Relations and Veterans Commission. The Community Relations and Veterans Commission was formed with nine (9) positions on the roster to accommodate representation from both Commissions.

Currently, two (2) members represent the disabled community, two (2) members represent the older adult community, two (2) members represent the veteran community, and three (3) members are at large. All nine (9) members are resident electors of the City. It is recommended to reduce the number of commissioners from nine (9) to seven (7) resident electors of the City; one (1) disabled community representative, one (1) older adult community representative, two (2) veteran community representatives, and three (3) at large representatives. The reduction of commissioners is recommended because there have been challenges recruiting members and struggles with maintaining quorums for meetings.

This update will require reassigning two current Commissioners, Don Long, from an older adult representative to a veteran representative (a seat he has held in the past), and Glenna Bloemen, from a disabled community representative to an older adult representative (a seat she has held in the past). This will leave the Commission with only one (1) at large vacancy to fill.

Page 102 of 105 ends

Staff recommends the Council approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance and the reassignments of Commissioner Don Long from an older adult representative to a veteran representative and Commissioner Glenna Bloemen from a disabled community representative to an older adult representative.

Attachment: A. Draft Ordinance

Page 103 of 105 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 2.73.010 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ADJUST THE NUMBER OF COMMISSIONERS ON THE COMMUNITY

RELATIONS AND VETERANS COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Section 2.60.010 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“There is hereby created the community relations and veterans commission of the city of La Mesa. The commission shall consist of seven appointed members. One member shall represent senior adults and shall not be less than fifty-five years of age at the time of appointment. One member shall be disabled or represent the disabled members of the community, three members shall be at large and two members shall represent veterans. These two members must meet one of the following criteria: 1) be an honorably discharged veteran of the United States armed forces; 2) be an active duty armed forces member serving in a civilian capacity; or 3) be a member of a veterans service organization based within the La Mesa city limits which is federally chartered and/or recognized by the department of veterans affairs for claim representation. If these particular appointments cannot be made and consequently vacancies occur, the remaining vacancies may be appointed at large. All seven members shall be resident electors of the city.

Each member is entitled to vote on matters before the commission.” SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published at least once in the Daily Transcript within 15 days of its adoption.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 22nd day of November 2022, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk

Page 104 of 105 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2022-XXXX duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 105 of 105 ends

La Mesa City CouncilDecember 13, 2022

La Mesa City Council
December 13, 2022