Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

La Mesa City Council
November 14, 2023

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
November 14, 2023
Body
La Mesa City Council
Pages
522
Original file
403.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-lamesa.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA

A Regular Meeting

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023, 6:00 p.m.

Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:

Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Laura Lothian
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Colin Parent
Councilmember Jack Shu
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.us), Facebook Live (www.facebook.com/lamesaca) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:

The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:

Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.

Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 500 words. eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time. •
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot by combined or yielded to another speaker.

Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.

Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Administrative Services Department 48 hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].

Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo i.d. or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION - VICE MAYOR LOTHIAN

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 BUDGET MONITORING REPORT 1

5.2 CITY TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT 14

5.3 POLICE CHIEF'S QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT 23

5.4 PRESENTATION FROM OCEANA ON SINGLE USE PLASTICS 38

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.

If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 9.1 through 9.10)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 9.6 and 9.7).

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 9.1 through 9.10.

9.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

9.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2023
62 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

9.3 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2023
64 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

9.4 RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF LA MESA

COMPENSATION PLANS
71 Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF LA
MESA COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

LISTING POSITIONS, SALARY RANGES/BANDS, AND PAY
STEPS

INCLUDING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED

SALARY BANDS FOR DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES,

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER, AND RECORDS TECHNICIAN
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF LA
MESA COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024, INCLUDING POSITIONS

AFFECTED BY THE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.5 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS FISCAL YEAR 2023
SUPER NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY; ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS IF AWARDED; AND APPOINTING THE CITY

MANAGER
90 OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY

AMENDMENTS
Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.6 *PROJECT 2023-2346 (MACDOUGALL) - A REQUEST TO
DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE,
APN 494-120-34-00 AND 494-130-16-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK

AND ESTABLISH A PROPERTY PRESERVATION (MILLS ACT)

AGREEMENT FOR THE SITE
95 Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CHARLOTTE AND JOHN
E. KING HOUSE AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE, APN 494-120-34-00
AND 494-130-16-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC

LANDMARK PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT

WITH THE OWNER OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK KNOWN
AS THE CHARLOTTE AND JOHN E. KING HOUSE LOCATED
AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE, APN 494-120-34-00 AND 494-130-
16-00
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.7 *PROJECT 2023-2284 (BOLDUC/YEH) - A REQUEST TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8406 HILLCREST AVENUE, APN 494- 434-01-00 AND 494-282-16-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND

ESTABLISH A PROPERTY PRESERVATION (MILLS ACT)

AGREEMENT FOR THE SITE
238
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CHESTER L. AND ANNE
HARRITT/WILLIAM HENRY WHEELER/A.E. DENNSTEDT
HOUSE AT 8406 HILLCREST AVENUE, APN 494-434-01-00
AND 494-282-16-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC

LANDMARK PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT

WITH THE OWNERS OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK
KNOWN AS THE CHESTER L. AND ANNE HARRIT/WILLIAM
HENRY WHEELER/A.E. DENNSTEDT HOUSE
LOCATED AT 8406 HILLCREST AVENUE, APN 494-434-01-00
AND 494-282-16-00
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.8 RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING BID 24-10, 2023 ANNUAL SLURRY

PROJECT
382
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BIDDER FOR BID 24-
10 AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
THE 2023 ANNUAL SLURRY PROJECT TO AMERICAN
ASPHALT SOUTH, INC.

Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TASK ORDER TO DUDEK TO

PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL SLURRY

PROJECT
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.9 RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING BID 24-08, ROLANDO PARK

RESTORATION PROJECT
396
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BIDDER FOR BID 24-
08 AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR

ROLANDO PARK RESTORATION PROJECT TO FORDYCE
CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF
$124,414.12 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNALLOCATED

RESERVES TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR BID 24-08, ROLANDO PARK RESTORATION PROJECT
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
c. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA

TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND

INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE ROLANDO BALLPARK

RESTORATION PROJECT
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.10 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF A 2023 FORD F-150

TO KEARNY MESA FORD AND KIA
412
Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10. ORDINANCE: FIRST READING

10.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.010 OF THE LA

MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND

TREASURER COMPENSATION
419
Staff Reference: Mr. Dedmon
Recommended Motion:

Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

11. STAFF REPORT

11.1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF LA

MESA COMPLETE STREETS INTEGRATED DESIGN MANUAL
423
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution adopting the Complete Streets Integrated Design Manual dated June 2023.

12. COUNCIL INITIATED

12.1 CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO PREPARE AN
ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE PREVAILING WAGES FOR PRIVATESECTOR EMPLOYEES THAT ARE ENGAGED IN TRAFFIC

CONTROL PROJECTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY - MAYOR

ARAPOSTATHIS AND COUNCILMEMBER PARENT
522
Recommended Motion:

Direct staff to prepare an ordinance to require prevailing wages for private-sector employees that are engaged in traffic control projects in public right-of-way.

13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)

14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))

15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS

16. ADJOURNMENT
DATE: November 14, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tammi Royales, Director of Finance
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: Budget Monitoring Report for Quarter Ending September 30, 2023

Page 1 of 522 ends

2023-2024 Budget Monitoring Report
Quarter Ending September 30, 2023
E:\Budget Monitoring Reports-Presentations\2023-2024\2023-2024 Q1 BMR.docx

Page 2 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 1
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 The Finance Department produces the quarterly Budget Monitoring Report using month-end financial information from the City’s financial system, input from staff in City departments, and relevant information from local, regional, and national sources (e.g., newspapers, economists, League of California Cities, etc.).

If you are new to this report, we suggest that you start by first reviewing the Reader’s Guide located at the end of the document for information on the organization and layout of the report.

Please contact Tammi Royales at 619.667.1122 if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions.

Table of Contents
Page
Executive Summary................................................................................................... 2 Resources .................................................................................................................. 7 Appropriations........................................................................................................... 8 Reserves..................................................................................................................... 9 Reader’s Guide .......................................................................................................... 10

Page 3 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 2
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Budget Monitoring Report details and analyzes economic indicators and forecasts based on certain assumptions and published projections through the quarter ending September 30, 2023.

While unemployment numbers remain relatively stable, we continue to see cracks in the economy as inflationary numbers and high interest rate lessen consumer confidence.

NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECASTS
U.S. Leading Economic Index
The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the U.S. declined by 0.7 percent in September 2023 to 104.6 (2016=100), following a decline of 0.5 percent in August. The LEI is down 3.4 percent over the six-month period between March and September 2023, an improvement from its 4.6 percent contraction over the previous six months (September 2022 to March 2023).
“The LEI for the US fell again in September, marking a year and a half of consecutive monthly declines since April 2022,” said Justyna Zabinska-La Monica, Senior Manager, Business Cycle Indicators, at The Conference Board. “In September, negative or flat contributions from nine of the index’s ten components more than offset fewer initial claims for unemployment insurance.

Although the six-month growth rate in the LEI is somewhat less negative, and the recession signal did not sound, it still signals risk of economic weakness ahead. So far, the US economy has shown considerable resilience despite pressures from rising interest rates and high inflation.

Nonetheless, The Conference Board forecasts that this trend will not be sustained for much longer, and a shallow recession is likely in the first half of 2024.”

Page 4 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 3
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Consumer Price Index
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) rose 0.4 percent in
September on a seasonally adjusted basis,
after increasing 0.6 percent in August, the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in
October. Over the last 12 months, the all
items index increased 3.7 percent before
seasonal adjustment. The index for shelter
was the largest contributor to the monthly
all items increase, accounting for over half
of the increase. An increase in the gasoline
index was also a major contributor to the all
items monthly rise. While the major energy
component indexes were mixed in September, the energy index rose 1.5 percent over the month.

The food index increased 0.2 percent in September, as it did in the previous two months. The index for food at home increased 0.1 percent over the month while the index for food away from home rose 0.4 percent.

The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.3 percent in September, the same increase as in August. Indexes which increased in September include rent, owners' equivalent rent, lodging away from home, motor vehicle insurance, recreation, personal care, and new vehicles. The indexes for used cars and trucks and for apparel were among those that decreased over the month.

The all items index increased 3.7 percent for the 12 months ending September, the same increase as the 12 months ending in August. The all items less food and energy index rose 4.1 percent over the last 12 months. The energy index decreased 0.5 percent for the 12 months ending September, and the food index increased 3.7 percent over the last year.

Municipal Cost Index
The Municipal Cost Index (MCI)
increased 0.3 percent in September after
increasing 0.8 percent in August and 0.4
percent in July. Overall, the MCI has
increased 1.4 percent over the past
twelve months. The MCI reflects the
impact of the costs of labor, materials
and contract services on the actual
inflation experienced by the City. These
costs are all factored into the composite
MCI. Major indicators of these items used
for the MCI include the Consumer Price
Index, the Producer Price Index and the
construction cost indexes published by
the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Page 5 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 4
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 U.S. Unemployment Rate
Total nonfarm payroll employment
increased by 336,000 in September, and
the unemployment rate was unchanged at

3.8 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics reported today. Job gains
occurred in leisure and hospitality;
government; health care, professional,
scientific, and technical services; and
social assistance. The unemployment rate
held at 3.85 percent in September. The
number of unemployed persons was
unchanged at 6.4 million. The number of
long-term unemployed (those jobless for
27 weeks or more) was little changed at 1.2 million in September. The long-term unemployed accounted for 19.1 percent of all unemployed persons.

Federal Funds Rate (Discount Rate)
A recent statement issued by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) indicators suggest that economic activity expanded at a strong pace in the third quarter. Job gains have moderated since earlier in the year but remain strong, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation remains elevated. The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient. Tighter financial and credit conditions for households and businesses are likely to weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. The extent of these effects remains uncertain. The Committee remains highly attentive to inflation risks.

STATE AND LOCAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECASTS
State and Local Unemployment
The state unemployment rate held at 4.6
percent in July and in August before
inclining to 4.7 percent in September.

The County of San Diego and the City of
La Mesa unemployment rates increased
from 3.9 percent and 4.0 percent
respectively in July to 4.3 percent and

4.3 percent respectively in August
before each decreasing to 4.0 percent
and 3.7 percent respectively in
September.

Page 6 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 5
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Total nonfarm employment in California
expanded by 8,700 positions. August’s
gains were also revised down to 8,900,
a 19,000 decrease to the preliminary
estimate of 27,900.

As of September 2023, California has
recovered all of the jobs that were lost
in March and April 2020 (the beginning
of the pandemic), and there are now
436,400 more people employed in the
state compared to pre-pandemic
February 2020. Since that time, total
nonfarm employment in California has grown 2.5% compared to a 3.0% increase nationally. On an annual basis, California increased payrolls by 1.7% from September 2022 to September 2023, trailing the 2.1% increase at the national level over the same period.

California’s unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.7% in the latest numbers, up 0.1 percentage points from the previous month. The state’s unemployment rate remains elevated relative to the

3.8% rate in the United States overall. California continues to struggle with its labor supply, which fell by 17,700 in September, a decrease of 0.1% on a month-over-month basis. Since February 2020, the state’s labor force has contracted by 216,300 workers, a 1.1% decline.

Local Sales Tax Allocations
La Mesa’s receipts from April through
June were 4.13 percent below the first
sales period in 2022, and place of sale
collections were down at 2.8 percent.

The regional economy demonstrated
strength during the first three months
of the year. The City’s largest sales tax
group, general consumer goods,
declined 5.0 percent. The City’s
allocations from the countywide use
tax pool dropped 4.8 percent. The
pools remain a solid source of local
revenue, bolstered by taxes on e-commerce.

The largest shift in sales tax is the change in the County Pool and the allocation of tax revenue.

These reductions were expected and reflected in the budget. Restaurants and food and drugs remain positive in overall growth. Slow-down has occurred in autos & transportation, building & construction, and fuel & service stations.

Proposition L continues to bring in positive results supported by restaurant, food & drug, autos & transportation, and general consumer goods.

Page 7 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 6
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

STATE BUDGET
Governor Gavin Newsom released the May Revision to his proposed 2023-24 California state budget on May 12, projecting a $31.5 billion shortfall, up from a projected $22.5 billion shortfall in January. The administration proposes to resolve the shortfall through a series of spending reductions, trigger cuts, and delays or deferrals of spending authorized in earlier years as well as through internal borrowing and fund shifts. The $224 billion General Fund spending plan would protect many ongoing investments made in prior years, mostly maintains state reserves that are projected to total $37.2 billion, and rejects raising revenues to continue to invest in Californians.

GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
General Fund Resources
General Fund revenues received through the first quarter of fiscal year 2023-2024 are in line with budget expectations at 12.4 percent. The General Fund’s major revenue sources, property tax and sales tax (both base sales & use tax and Proposition L transaction tax) are not received at regular intervals throughout the fiscal year, but rather towards the middle and end of the fiscal year with a final accrual received and recorded in mid-August. For this reason, revenue streams received from these sources through the first quarter of the fiscal year will not equate to 25 percent of the total annual revenues that are eventually received.

Page 8 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 7
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023  Overall, total general fund revenues are meeting budgetary expectations for the fiscal year but came in higher when compared to the same period last fiscal year.  Property tax revenues are not received until the second quarter.

 Sales tax revenues received through the first quarter FY24 are meeting budgetary expectations and are above when compared to the same time last year  Proposition L sales tax revenues are meeting budgetary expectations and, consistent with base sales tax, are above the same time last fiscal year.  Cannabis Tax was not fully collected by the time of this report  Other General Fund revenues, including licenses and permits, mostly due to building permit fees; revenue from other agencies, and service charge revenue from recreation classes and engineering fees are within budgetary expectations.

General Fund Resources
Through 25% of Fiscal Year
2023 - 2024
Budget¹
YTD Collected
(unaudited)
% of
Budget
Collected
YTD Collected
(unaudited)
% of
Budget
Collected
Revenues:

Taxes
Property Tax $ 18,610,380.00 $ 183,820.00 1.0% $ 177,575.00 1.0% Former Tax Increment (RDA) 300,000.00 - 0.0% 343,600.00 114.5% Sales 17,000,000.00 3,249,050.00 19.1% 1,127,792.00 6.6% Proposition L 12,500,000.00 1,715,680.00 13.7% 804,074.00 6.4% Cannabis Business Tax 2,500,000.00 25,960.00 1.0% 2,672.00 0.1% Other 3,207,680.00 265,540.00 8.3% 145,920.00 4.5%
Subtotal Taxes $ 54,118,060.00 5,440,050.00 10.1% 2,601,633.00 4.8% Licenses & permits $ 1,752,300.00 $ 595,440.00 34.0% $ 506,605.00 28.9% Fines, forfeitures & penalties 469,000.00 120,290.00 25.6% 74,704.00 15.9% Use of money and property 1,904,000.00 1,001,240.00 52.6% 290,460.00 15.3% Revenue from other agencies 1,530,750.00 431,210.00 28.2% 76,478.00 5.0% Service charges 2,534,150.00 703,190.00 27.7% 555,226.00 21.9% Other revenue 5,499,190.00 147,760.00 2.7% 8,770.00 0.2% Total Revenues $ 67,807,450.00 8,439,180.00 12.4% 4,113,876.00 6.0% Other financing sources:

Interfund transfers in 3,090,200.00 192,240.00 6.2% 579,947.00 19% Interfund transfers out (2,448,450.00) (254,000.00) 10.4% (233,700.00) 10% Total other financing sources 641,750.00 (61,760.00) -9.6% 346,247.00 54% Plus: Fund Balance at July 1 50,122,196.00 50,122,196.00 100% 42,293,571.00 84% Total resources $ 118,571,396.00 $ 58,499,616.00 49% $ 46,753,694.00 39% ¹ Budget reflects any amendments approved by the City Council through end of the quarter Current Fiscal Tear Prior Year Comparison

Page 9 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 8
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 General Fund Appropriations
 Most departments are at or slightly above expectations through 25 percent of the fiscal year.
 Departments that are higher than budgeted are due timing of contractual obligations.

General Fund Reserves
The estimated available reserves ending the fiscal year 2022-2023 are $50,122,196 The City Council’s reserve policies formally establish two General Fund reserve targets: a Rainy Day Reserve target of 15 percent and an additional Cash Flow Reserve target of 25 percent.

Because of the additional Proposition L Sales Tax revenues, a projected small but steady Forcasted
FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23
Final Budget
FY 23-24
Final Budget FY
24-25
Available Reserves at June 30 36,598,856.00 42,293,571.00 50,122,196.00 41,920,331.00 36,826,970.00 Reserves as % of Operating
Expenditures

69.6% 61.6% 79% 59% 57%
Source of Revenues:

Property Sale (Police Station) 3,050,000.00 3,050,000.00 3,050,000.00 3,050,000.00 3,050,000.00 Property Sale (Other land) 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 Proposition L Revenues 10,900,549.00 11,900,000.00 10,301,000.00 12,500,000.00 12,656,300.00 Reserves from Operations 18,648,307.00 23,343,571.00 32,771,196.00 22,370,331.00 20,687,757.00 Total Ending General Fund Reserves 36,598,856.00 42,293,571.00 50,122,196.00 41,920,331.00 40,394,057.00 Actuals

Page 10 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 9
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 recovery of base sales and property taxes, and continued cost containment measures by departments, the General Fund reserves are projected to meet both the 15 percent Rainy Day Reserve target and the additional Cash Flow Reserve target of 25 percent in fiscal year 2023- 2024.

CONCLUSIONS
There are many factors to consider heading in to 2024 and monitoring the budget. While we have to account for what is going on globally that impacts our economy, there are local factors that play into the consensus as well. Student loan payments have commenced, interest rates are still historically high, the housing market is stagnating due to pricing and interest rates, and inflationary pricing has taken its toll. But, unemployment remains stable and people are still spending. We continue to remain cautious as we head into an election year and will continue to make adjustments as needed.

READER’S GUIDE
Managing a municipality the size of La Mesa is, in many ways, like managing a for profit corporation. Instead of focusing upon bottom-line profits, La Mesa managers must skillfully steward public dollars and ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the City’s operations. They must live within legislatively approved budgets that are reviewed by residents, business leaders, and others interested in the City.

Like private corporations, public entities report their financial condition on a regular basis.

Corporations make reports to stockholders while public entities report to their “stakeholders” -- the individuals and organizations that have a “stake” in the entity’s operations.

In addition to an annual financial report and biennial budget document, the City of La Mesa publishes a quarterly Budget Monitoring Report to provide stakeholders with current information about the City’s financial condition and performance in the essential areas of the City’s operations.

This report is designed to give the reader a sense of how well La Mesa is doing fiscally and what its current successes or challenges might be. It includes a high level overview of the City’s financial condition followed by more detailed information on resources and expenditures for those readers who are interested in going beyond the bottom line.

This Reader’s Guide has been developed to assist you in reviewing the City of La Mesa’s quarterly Budget Monitoring Report. It highlights the type of information contained in each section and presents a glossary of commonly used budget terms.

Please contact Tammi Royales at 619.667.1122 if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions.

Page 11 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 10
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

QUARTERLY BUDGET MONITORING REPORT ORGANIZATION
Executive Summary – A broad level overview of the City of La Mesa’s current financial condition.

It begins with comments on the economy, followed by a summary financial table and graph along with any comments highlighting resources and expenditures.

Resources – A more detailed discussion of revenue collections and other resources supporting the City’s expenditures. Included in the discussion is a financial table showing the current year’s budget, year-to-date collections, and calculated percent of budget collected. The discussion also includes comments on the significant factors and conditions affecting these items.

Appropriations – A more detailed discussion of expenditures and reserves. Included in the discussion is a financial table showing the current year’s budget by department, year-to-date expenditures, and calculated percent of budget expended. The discussion also includes comments on the significant factors and conditions affecting these items.

Reserves - Commentary on estimated ending fund balance and its relationship to reserve targets.

Included is a table displaying historical ending fund balance related to reserve targets.

FUNDS NOT REPORTED ON
This report focuses on the General Fund which provides the majority of government services.

Other funds have been excluded from this report.

GLOSSARY
The following are definitions of some of the more common terms one may encounter in reviewing this document.

Accrual Basis – The basis of accounting under which revenues are recorded when they are earned and expenditures are recorded when they result in liabilities for benefits received.

Accrued Revenue – Revenue earned during the current accounting period but which is not collected until a subsequent accounting period.

Appropriation – Amount authorized for expenditure by the City Council.

Beginning Fund Balance – An account used to record resources available for expenditure in one fiscal year because of revenues collected in excess of the budget and/or expenditures less than the budget in the prior fiscal year.

Budget - A financial operating plan for a given period which displays the expenditures to provide services or to accomplish a purpose during that period together with the estimated sources of revenue (income) to pay for those expenditures. Once the fund totals shown in the budget are appropriated by the City Council, they become maximum spending limits.

Page 12 of 522 ends

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 11
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Ending Fund Balance - An account used to record resources available at year end as a result of revenues collected in excess of the budget and/or expenditures less than the budget during the fiscal year. The City’s operating reserves are budgeted in the General Fund ending fund balance.

Expenditure – The payment for City obligations, goods, and services.

Fiscal Year – A twelve-month period designated as the operating year for accounting and budgeting purposes. The City of La Mesa’s fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.

Fund - Governmental accounting systems are organized and operated on a fund basis. A fund is an independent financial and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts in which financial transactions relating to revenues, expenditures, assets, and liabilities are recorded.

Funds are established to account for the use of restricted revenue sources and, normally, to carry on specific activities or pursue specific objectives.

General Fund – The financial and accounting entity that comprises typical operations of a municipality such as police, fire, public works, and other departments.

Grants – A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function.

Grants may be classified as either operational or capital, depending upon the grantor.

M&O (Maintenance and Operating) Costs – Expenditure category that represents amounts paid for supplies and other services and charges.

Proposition L – The La Mesa Vital City Services Measure which was passed by voters on November 4, 2008 authorizing a ¾ cent local transactions and use tax (commonly referred to as a sales tax). This general purpose tax became effective on April 1, 2009.

Reserve – An account used either to set aside budgeted revenues that are not required for expenditure in the current budget or to earmark revenues for a specific future purpose.

Resources - Total dollars available for appropriation, including estimated revenues, interfund transfers, and beginning fund balances.

Revenue - Sources of income received during the fiscal year, operating transfers from other funds, and other financing sources such as the proceeds derived from the sale of fixed assets.

Revenues from Other Agencies – Funds received from federal, state, and other local government sources in the form of grants, shared revenues, and payments in lieu of taxes.

Taxes – Compulsory charges levied by a government for financing services performed for the common benefit of the people. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefit, such as special assessments.

Trust Funds – Funds used to account for assets held by a government in a trustee capacity for individuals, private organizations, other governments, and/or other funds. Examples are pension trust funds, nonexpendable trust funds, and expendable trust funds.

Page 13 of 522 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 14, 2023
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2023
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Finance Department – City Treasurer

SUMMARY
PORTFOLIO VALUE:

The City’s portfolio ended the quarter with a market value of $72,086,129. This represents a discount of $3,866,173 from par value, or purchase price. As the City maintains an Investment Policy that follows a strict “buy and hold” strategy, there is no economic gain or loss upon call or maturity. The City’s securities continue to earn interest at the stated rates through the dates of redemption.

LIQUIDITY:

Liquidity meets the statutory requirements with $24,601,302 in LAIF for immediate availability. “LAIF” stands for Local Agency Investment Fund, and is operated by the California State Treasurer to act as an immediate-access account for local governments and special districts in California.

EARNINGS:

Investment earnings from the invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit, but excluding LAIF, for the current quarter collected from July 1, 2023, through September 30, 2023, total $278,961, which represents an annualized rate of 2.17%. Investment earnings from LAIF for the current quarter total $260,887, which represents an annualized rate of 4.24%. Combined, investment earnings were $539,848, representing a total annualized rate of return of 2.84% for this quarter.

Please note that this represents interest payments and dividends actually earned by the City during the quarter, and may not necessarily reflect all interest payments and dividends payable to the City for the current quarter due to differing payment schedules and variable interest rates.

Page 14 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 2 of 5
City’s Strategic Goal
To maintain a financially sound and affordable
city government
SAFETY
Federal Agencies
• Carry the implied guarantee of the United States government Corporate Securities
• The City’s Investment Policy requires ratings of Double A (AA) or better Certificates of Deposit
• Guaranteed by the FDIC to $250,000
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
• Managed by the California State Treasurer; consists primarily of U.S. Treasuries, government agency bonds, and other short-term investments.

LIQUIDITY
The City’s LAIF balance of $24,601,302 represents the City’s immediate cash and is 31.8% of the portfolio. Additionally, as investments mature, they can be reinvested at then-current rates or redeemed to provide additional operating cash. The invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit has an average maturity of 2.6 years with $3,969,000 maturing within one year for added liquidity.

EARNINGS
As noted above, the City’s portfolio earned $539,848 this quarter, representing an annualized yield of 2.84%.

Page 15 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 3 of 5

PORTFOLIO PROFILE
To achieve the City’s strategic goal, the City’s primary investment objectives, in order of priority, are: Safety, Liquidity, and Earnings. Key to each of these objectives is a well-diversified portfolio that minimizes credit and interest rate risk and provides necessary liquidity. The City’s portfolio is designed to meet these objectives as summarized in the following table which is presented at par values. This table represents the City’s holdings as of September 30, 2023:

Years to
Maturity
Government
Agencies
Corporate
Securities
Certificates
of Deposit LAIF Total 3/31/2023
%of
Portfolio
Interest
Rate
0 – 1 0 500,000 3,469,000 24,601,302 28,570,302 37.62% 2.69%* 1 – 2 8,000,000 0 2,713,000 - 10,713,000 14.10% 2.51%
2 – 3 9,000,000 1,000,000 2,481,000 - 12,481,000 16.43% 1.42% 3 – 4 16,000,000 0 3,962,000 - 19,962,000 26.28% 2.36%
4 – 5 1,750,000 0 2,476,000 - 4,226,000 5.56% 4.87%
Totals 34,750,000 1,500,000 15,101,000 24,601,302 75,952,302 100.00% Portfolio % 45.75% 1.97% 19.88% 32.39% 100.00%
Interest
Rate 2.21% 1.82% 2.88% 3.59% 2.78%
*Interest rate for assets with 0-1 years to maturity excludes LAIF

Page 16 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 4 of 5

PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
During the quarter, ten certificates of deposit and one federal agency bond were purchased and five certificates of deposit and one federal agency bond matured. No other holdings in the City’s portfolio matured, were called, or were purchased.

Certificates of Deposit Purchased: Maturity Rate Par Value Balboa Thrift & Loan 5 year 4.40% $249,000
First Foundation Bank 4 year 4.60% $244,000
TTCU Credit Union 5 year 5.00% $248,000
Numerica Credit Union 3 year 5.20% $248,000
Farmers Insurance Group Credit Union 3 year 5.10% $248,000 Chartway Federal Credit Union 3 year 5.25% $248,000
Oregon Community 3 year 5.10% $248,000
Gesa Credit Union 3 year 5.25% $248,000
Tucson Federal Credit Union 5 year 5.00% $248,000
Greenstate Credit Union 5 year 5.00% $248,000
Federal Agencies Purchased: Maturity Rate Par Value
FHLB (callable) 5 year 5.75% $750,000
Certificates of Deposit Matured: Maturity Rate Par Value Bank of New England Salem 5 year 3.25% $249,000
Raymond James Bank 4 year 1.95% $247,000
LCA Bank Corp 5 year 3.10% $246,000
Midwest Independent Bank 5 year 3.15% $249,000
Neighbors Federal Credit Union 5 year 3.30% $245,000
Federal Agencies Matured: Maturity Rate Par Value
FAMC 5 year 3.05% $500,000

Page 17 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 5 of 5

PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE
The portfolio complies with California code sections concerning safety and liquidity in the investment of public funds. Investment strategies are based on liquidity requirements and interest rate projections and have been collaboratively determined by the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance. The City Treasurer executes trades in accordance with these strategies.

Required Contents of Investment Reports
California Government Code Section 53646(b) suggests that the quarterly investment report of a local agency contain certain items. These items include the type of investment, the issuer’s name, the date of maturity of the security, the par amount of the instrument, the market value, and the dollar amount invested in each security. The source of the market value also should be included in the report. The report also must reference all funds that are under the management of external investment providers, such as investment advisors and investment managers. A local government’s quarterly report, if submitted, must state the portfolio’s compliance with the agency’s investment policy or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance. Finally, the investment report must include a statement regarding the local agency’s ability to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months.

Accordingly, I advise you of the following facts in compliance with Government Code Section 53646(b):

1. The source of the valuations included herein is U.S. Bank, Saint Paul, MN 55107.

2. No funds are under the management of external providers or managers. Investment decisions are made by a consensus of the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance.

3. The City’s portfolio remains in strict compliance with the Investment Policy of the City of La Mesa for FY 2023-2024.

4. The City of La Mesa’s investment portfolio more than adequately assures the City’s ability to meet its cash flow needs during the ensuing six months.

Reviewed by Respectfully submitted by
___________________________ ___________________________ Greg Humora Matt Strabone
City Manager City Treasurer
Attachments:

A - Schedule of Investments – Summary
B - Schedule of Investments – Detail

Page 18 of 522 ends

City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments (Summary)
As of September 30, 2023
Issuer Type of Investment Maturity Date Par Value Book Value Market Value State of California LAIF 98-37-421 Demand 24,601,302 24,601,302 24,264,455 Federal Agencies U.S. Agency Obligations 10/2024 - 07/2028 34,750,000 34,747,500 32,072,720 Financial/Banking Institutions Certificates of Deposit 11/2023 - 09/2028 15,101,000 15,101,000 14,371,505 Corporate Obligations Medium Term Notes 07/2024 - 02/2026 1,500,000 1,492,425 1,377,450 Total 75,952,302 75,942,227 72,086,129
I certify that the investment of funds is in conformance with California Government Code section 53600. Those investments valued at below market cost will be held until maturity or until they can be sold without a loss. I also certify that the investment of funds provides the cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's estimated expenditure requirements.

Matt Strabone, City Treasurer

Page 19 of 522 ends

City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, September 30, 2023
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 949763VK9 WELLS FARGO BANK C D 11/28/2018 11/28/2023 3.55% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,238.06 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 635573AL2 NATIONAL CITY C D 3.400% 12/21/2018 12/21/2023 3.40% 245,000.00 245,000.00 243,831.35 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 59013KAR7 MERRICK BK SOUTH C D 06/28/2019 12/28/2023 2.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,139.97 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 61760AVJ5 MORGAN STANLEY C D 02/07/2019 02/07/2024 3.10% 246,000.00 246,000.00 243,916.38 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 58117WAD9 MCHENRY SVGS BK C D 03/14/2019 03/14/2024 2.80% 246,000.00 246,000.00 243,055.38 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 7954502D6 SALLIE MAE BANK C D 04/10/2019 04/10/2024 2.75% 246,000.00 246,000.00 242,541.24 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 81407SBG1 SECURITY BK NEW C D 06/10/2019 06/10/2024 2.50% 249,000.00 249,000.00 243,778.47 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 726547BK7 PLAINS ST BK C D 2.300% 06/21/2019 06/21/2024 2.30% 249,000.00 249,000.00 243,165.93 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 46256YBB4 IOWA ST BK C D 2.10% 07/10/2019 07/10/2024 2.10% 247,000.00 247,000.00 240,405.10 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 20143PDY3 COMMERCIAL BK C D 07/15/2019 07/15/2024 2.00% 249,000.00 249,000.00 242,013.06 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 43719LAB1 HOME LN INVT BK C D 07/19/2019 07/19/2024 2.00% 249,000.00 249,000.00 241,908.48 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 29278TKJ8 ENERBANK USA C D 08/07/2019 08/07/2024 2.15% 247,000.00 247,000.00 239,812.30 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 15118RRH2 CELTIC BANK C D 1.82466% 08/30/2019 08/30/2024 1.89% 249,000.00 249,000.00 240,501.63 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 938828BM1 WASHINGTON C D 2.000% 08/30/2019 08/30/2024 2.00% 249,000.00 249,000.00 240,835.29 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 29367SJQ8 ENTERPRISE BANK C D 11/08/2019 11/08/2024 1.80% 249,000.00 249,000.00 238,629.15 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 32117WAN2 FNB OF ALBANY C D 02/28/2020 02/28/2025 1.60% 225,000.00 225,000.00 212,645.25 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 29260MAV7 ENCORE BK C D 1.150% 03/25/2020 03/25/2025 1.15% 249,000.00 249,000.00 233,064.00 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 73319FAK5 POPPY BANK C D 1.100% 03/27/2020 03/27/2025 1.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 232,829.94 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 79772FAF3 SAN FRANCISCO C D 03/27/2020 03/27/2025 1.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 232,829.94 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 020080BX4 ALMA BANK C D 1.400% 03/30/2020 03/28/2025 1.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 233,920.56 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 51210SSD0 LAKESIDE BK C D 1.400% 03/30/2020 03/31/2025 1.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 233,823.45 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 694231AC5 PACIFIC C D 1.150% 03/31/2020 03/31/2025 1.15% 249,000.00 249,000.00 232,927.05 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 856285TF8 STATE BK INDIA C D 1.600% 04/29/2020 04/29/2025 1.60% 248,000.00 248,000.00 233,055.52 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 33847E3F2 FLAGSTAR BK FSB C D 04/30/2020 04/30/2025 1.05% 248,000.00 248,000.00 230,989.68 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 06063HMS9 BANK BARODA NEW C D 07/22/2020 07/22/2025 0.70% 249,000.00 249,000.00 228,156.21 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 89235MKY6 TOYOTA FINL C D 0.900% 04/22/2021 04/22/2026 0.90% 248,000.00 248,000.00 221,203.60 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 02007GQQ9 ALLY BK UT C D 2.850% 05/02/2022 05/05/2026 2.85% 246,000.00 246,000.00 230,568.42 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 90348JQ29 UBS BK USA SALT C D 07/14/2021 07/14/2026 0.90% 249,000.00 249,000.00 219,837.12 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 30960QAS6 FARMERS INS C D 5.100% 07/26/2023 07/27/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 245,896.96 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 16141BAH4 CHARTWAY FED C D 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 246,871.60 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 68584JAG4 OREGON CMNTY CR C D 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 245,899.44 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 37424PAH7 GESA CR UN C D 5.250% 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 246,881.52 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 67054NBL6 NUMERICA CR UN C D 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.20% 248,000.00 248,000.00 246,554.16 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 32022RSC2 FIRST FINL BK C D 3.250% 08/01/2022 08/03/2026 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 234,782.10 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 70962LAE2 PENTAGON C D 0.850% 09/01/2021 09/01/2026 0.85% 249,000.00 249,000.00 218,402.88 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 14042RQB0 CAPITAL ONE NATL C D 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 217,788.64 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 14042TDW4 CAPITAL ONE BANK C D 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 217,788.64 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 07371CE88 BEAL BK USA C D 1.900% 02/23/2022 02/17/2027 1.90% 247,000.00 247,000.00 220,897.04 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 02589ABQ4 AMERICAN EXPRESS C D 03/09/2022 03/09/2027 2.00% 247,000.00 247,000.00 221,393.51 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 06740KPK7 BARCLAYS BK DEL C D 04/13/2022 04/13/2027 2.65% 246,000.00 246,000.00 225,097.38 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 58404DPC9 MEDALLION BK C D 3.200% 05/24/2022 05/24/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 231,674.58 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 20825WAX8 CONNEXUS CR UN C D 05/26/2022 05/26/2027 3.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 230,830.47

Page 20 of 522 ends

City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, September 30, 2023
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 90352RCN3 USALLIANCE FCU C D 05/31/2022 05/28/2027 3.30% 249,000.00 249,000.00 232,466.40 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 50625LBN2 LAFAYETTE FED C D 06/15/2022 06/15/2027 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 231,911.13 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 88413QDL9 THIRD FED SVGS C D 06/28/2022 06/28/2027 3.50% 245,000.00 245,000.00 230,275.50 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 254673L38 DISCOVER BK C D 3.400% 07/06/2022 07/06/2027 3.40% 245,000.00 245,000.00 229,383.70 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 32026UU20 FIRST FNDTN BK C D 07/19/2023 07/19/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 238,339.20 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 307811EM7 FARMERS C D 3.200% 08/05/2022 08/05/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 231,064.53 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 08016PEH8 BELMONT BK TR C D 08/24/2022 08/24/2027 3.15% 249,000.00 249,000.00 230,466.93 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 19075JAB4 COBALT FED CR C D 3.600% 09/15/2022 09/15/2027 3.60% 249,000.00 249,000.00 234,289.08 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 052392BT3 AUSTIN TELCO C D 3.800% 09/21/2022 09/21/2027 3.80% 249,000.00 249,000.00 236,037.06 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 87164YT95 SYNCHRONY C D 4.600% 10/28/2022 10/28/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 238,197.68 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 25460FDW3 DIRECT FED CR C D 4.800% 11/07/2022 11/08/2027 4.80% 248,000.00 248,000.00 243,833.60 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 61690U5K2 MORGAN STANLEY C D 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.45% 244,000.00 244,000.00 235,821.12 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 804767AB7 SAVANNAH BK C D 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 237,040.53 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK C D 05/05/2023 05/05/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 237,023.10 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 92834ABT2 VISIONBANK ST C D 4.050% 05/12/2023 05/12/2028 4.05% 249,000.00 249,000.00 236,460.36 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 05765LBU0 BALBOA THRIFT C D 07/19/2023 07/19/2028 4.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,031.39 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 89854LAD5 TTCU FED CR UN C D 07/26/2023 07/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 244,932.24 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 898812AC6 TUCSON FED CR C D 09/08/2023 09/08/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 244,800.80 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 39573LEM6 GREENSTATE CR UN C D 09/26/2023 09/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 244,748.72 Subtotal: 15,101,000.00 15,101,000.00 14,371,504.52
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value CORPORATE BONDS 48133DN55 JPMORGAN MTN L P 07/29/2022 07/29/2024 4.05% 500,000.00 500,000.00 490,175.00 CORPORATE BONDS 46632FRU1 JPMORGAN CHASE MTN 01/22/2021 01/22/2026 0.70% 500,000.00 500,000.00 436,480.00 CORPORATE BONDS 037833EB2 APPLE INC 0.700% 02/08/2021 02/08/2026 0.70% 500,000.00 492,425.00 450,795.00 Subtotal: 1,500,000.00 1,492,425.00 1,377,450.00
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value US AGENCIES 3130ASPM5 F H L B DEB 3.550% 07/29/2022 10/28/2024 3.55% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 980,820.00 US AGENCIES 3130ASQP7 F H L B DEB 3.625% 07/28/2022 01/28/2025 3.63% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 978,130.00 US AGENCIES 3130ASF61 F H L B DEB 3.450% 06/27/2022 06/27/2025 3.45% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 967,470.00 US AGENCIES 3134GXZY3 F H L M C M T N 4.000% 06/30/2022 06/30/2025 4.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 975,370.00 US AGENCIES 31422XB50 F A M C M T N 3.630% 07/28/2022 07/28/2025 3.63% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 969,220.00 US AGENCIES 3134GXF66 F H L M C M T N 4.000% 08/01/2022 08/01/2025 4.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 974,700.00 US AGENCIES 3136G4G98 F N M A 0.560% 08/12/2020 08/12/2025 0.56% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 916,540.00 US AGENCIES 3136G4C43 F N M A 0.650% 08/14/2020 08/14/2025 0.65% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 917,940.00 US AGENCIES 3130ALD76 F H L B DEB 0.700% 02/25/2021 02/25/2026 0.70% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 898,470.00 US AGENCIES 3130ALGB4 F H L B DEB 0.800% 03/17/2021 03/17/2026 0.80% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 898,760.00 US AGENCIES 3130ALMM3 F H L B DEB 1.000% 03/30/2021 03/30/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 902,190.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMDY5 F H L B DEB 1.000% 05/20/2021 05/20/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 898,590.00 US AGENCIES 3133EMH21 F F C B DEB 0.900% 06/12/2021 06/15/2026 0.90% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 893,300.00

Page 21 of 522 ends

City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, September 30, 2023
US AGENCIES 3130AMPT3 F H L B DEB 1.030% 06/23/2021 06/23/2026 1.03% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 895,850.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMWX6 F H L B DEB 1.020% 06/30/2021 06/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 895,030.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANHW3 F H L B DEB 0.930% 07/29/2021 08/25/2026 0.93% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 888,020.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANSB7 F H L B DEB 1.000% 09/17/2021 09/17/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 887,990.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANYR5 F H L B DEB 0.950% 09/30/2021 09/30/2026 0.95% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 885,530.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6M2 F H L B DEB 1.020% 09/30/2021 09/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 887,450.00 US AGENCIES 3130APB87 F H L B DEB 1.100% 10/13/2021 10/13/2026 1.10% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 888,490.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6U4 F H L B DEB 1.000% 10/14/2021 10/14/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 885,630.00 US AGENCIES 3130APDQ5 F H L B DEB 1.250% 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.25% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 891,380.00 US AGENCIES 3130APL78 F H L B DEB 1.375% 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.38% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 894,870.00 US AGENCIES 3130APQA6 F H L B DEB 1.400% 11/24/2021 11/24/2026 1.40% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 893,080.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQUD3 F H L B DEB 2.010% 02/25/2022 02/25/2027 2.01% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 903,350.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQZ55 F H L B DEB 2.500% 03/10/2022 03/10/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 917,270.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARAH4 F H L B DEB 2.350% 03/04/2022 03/29/2027 2.35% 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 911,810.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARDY4 F H L B DEB 2.500% 03/29/2022 03/29/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 916,320.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARGE5 F H L B DEB 3.000% 04/21/2022 04/21/2027 3.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 930,050.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARW56 F H L B DEB 3.650% 05/12/2022 05/12/2027 3.65% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 946,350.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARYA3 F H L B DEB 4.000% 05/26/2022 05/26/2027 4.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 954,880.00 US AGENCIES 3130AS7J2 F H L B DEB 3.200% 06/10/2022 06/10/2027 3.20% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 935,600.00 US AGENCIES 3134GXZN7 F H L M C M T N 4.250% 07/12/2022 07/12/2027 4.25% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 961,170.00 US AGENCIES 3134GX5E0 F H L M C M T N 5.000% 10/27/2022 10/27/2027 5.00% 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 992,710.00 US AGENCIES 3130AWMJ6 F H L B DEB 5.750% 07/26/2023 07/26/2028 5.75% 750,000.00 750,000.00 738,390.00 Subtotal: 34,750,000.00 34,747,500.00 32,072,720.00
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value Demand 98-37-421 LAIF State of California 3.59% 24,601,302.21 24,601,302.21 24,264,454.76 Grand Total: 75,952,302.21 75,942,227.21 72,086,129.28

Page 22 of 522 ends

DATE: November 14, 2023
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: LMPD Quarterly Report 3rd Quarter
Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Please see the attached 3rd Quarter Report for the Police Department.

Page 23 of 522 ends

Quarterly Report
3rd Quarter 2023
Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
Prepared by Crime Analysis

Page 24 of 522 ends

1 Crime Trends and Statistics
The 3rd quarter of 2023 concluded with 21.0 crimes per thousand residents compared to

23.3 crimes per thousand in the 3rd quarter of 2022, which represents a 10.6% decrease in the number of crimes. During this period violent crime increased 34.8% and property crime decreased 17.1%.

FBI Part 1 Crimes, 3rd Quarter Year to Date
Historical Violent Crime Comparison, 3rd Quarter Year to Date

Page 25 of 522 ends

2 While incidents of homicide and robbery remained relatively the same compared to last year, incidents of rape and aggravated assault increased. Eight of the nine rapes reported in the 3rd Quarter of 2023 were committed by an individual known to the victim. Forty-four (44) percent of aggravated assaults were domestic violence related during the 3rd quarter of 2023. Domestic violence related assaults increased 75% in 2023 year-to-date compared to 2022.

Overall, the total number of robberies committed in 2023 year-to-date increased 2.6% compared to 2022. Sixty (60) percent of all robberies were closed by arrest year-to-date in 2023; this includes a seventy-nine (79) percent clearance rate for commercial robberies.

Case Clearances
On 07/01/23, at approximately 11:50 PM, patrol officers responded to an alarm activation at the 7-Eleven convenience store located at 5726 Amaya Drive. The suspect approached the counter, lifted his shirt, implying he had a firearm, and demanded money from the cashier. The cashier complied, and the suspect fled on foot. La Mesa patrol officers later arrested the suspect at the Amaya Drive Trolley stop. He was convicted of PC 211 – Robbery and received a 15-year prison sentence, which was enhanced due to a prior felony strike on his record.

On 08/19/23, at approximately 11:37 AM, patrol officers responded to a radio call at the Grossmont Center Walmart. Two females reported being assaulted by a fellow shopper after a verbal altercation escalated inside the store. The suspect physically pushed the victims, causing them to fall and sustain injuries. Subsequently, one of the victims had to be transported to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. The suspect was located outside the store. The case was forwarded to the District Attorney's office for prosecution for PC 243(D) – Battery with serious injury. Furthermore, due to one of the victims being over the age of 65, an additional charge of PC 368 (b)(1) – Elder Abuse was also recommended.

On 09/05/23, at approximately 1:21 PM, patrol officers responded to a call about a male throwing rocks at a Grossmont Hospital security guard. The guard had initially asked the suspect to leave the hospital grounds due to loitering. In response, the suspect made a stabbing motion toward the guard. The guard quickly moved away and realized the suspect was not holding a weapon. The suspect then swung a pair of headphones at the guard, hitting the guard's arm. As the suspect walked away, he threw four, three-inch rocks at the guard's torso and head. The suspect was subsequently arrested and booked into San Diego County Jail for PC 245(a)(1) – Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Notably, La Mesa patrol officers had encountered the same individual three times in the previous three days, both at Grossmont Hospital and Grossmont Center mall. During that week, the suspect had been arrested twice for PC 647(f) – Drunk in public and cited for PC 594(b)(2)(a) – Vandalism over $400.

Page 26 of 522 ends

3 Historical Property Crime Comparison, 3rd Quarter Year to Date Compared to the previous year, residential burglary increased 30.6%, commercial burglary decreased 13.3%, theft decreased 25.4%, and auto theft increased 3.6%. Twenty-five (25) percent of residential burglaries in 2023 have been cleared by arrest.

Case Clearances
On the morning of 08/04/23, La Mesa patrol officers were conducting an extra patrol of the Grossmont Trolley stop. Officers engaged in a consensual conversation with an individual who voluntarily disclosed he was in possession of methamphetamine. Subsequently, a consensual search was conducted, leading to the suspect’s arrest for 11377(a) H&S - Possession of a Controlled Substance (Methamphetamine) and 11364(a) H&S - Possession of Drug Paraphernalia. Further investigation revealed that inside the suspect’s four-wheeled wagon, there were 13 packages addressed to 13 separate individuals. All of the packages had addresses within the Jefferson apartment complex located at 4949 Baltimore Drive. The Jefferson property manager confirmed that the parcel room had been burglarized early that morning. The suspect was arrested and booked in Central Jail with an added 13 charges of 530.5 PC – Identity theft and one added charge of 459 PC – Burglary.

On 09/07/23, around 2:45 AM, two suspects used a chain tied to a stolen vehicle to forcibly remove the front security door of 5 Star Liquor, located at 7495 University Avenue. The suspects then fled in an unknown direction. Later that morning, La Mesa residents living south of the liquor store reported suspicious activity to the Police Department.

Subsequently, officers were able to locate and recover the stolen vehicle. Additionally, residents provided a license plate number for a second suspicious vehicle seen in the

Page 27 of 522 ends

4 neighborhood. This license plate was associated with a person of interest in the case and was known to investigators. The suspect also had a warrant for a parole violation. On 09/08/23, the suspect was arrested in Lemon Grove by the San Diego Sheriff’s Department. La Mesa Detectives added charges of 459 PC – Burglary, 594(B)(1) PC – Vandalism, and 182(A)(1) – Conspiracy to Commit a Crime to his booking at Central Jail.

On 09/22/23 at approximately 4:31 AM, La Mesa patrol officers responded to a call of a burglary in progress at La Cuesta Apartments, located at 7272 Saranac Street. The witness reported a subject was attempting to pry open the coin boxes to the laundry machines in the complex’s laundry room. The subject was unsuccessful and fled on foot.

During a search of the neighborhood, officers located a subject nearby who matched the description provided by the witness. Additional evidence led to the arrest of the suspect for 459 PC – Burglary. The suspect was booked into Central Jail.

Supervised Persons in the City
Parolees and Probationers
Below is a graph representing the number of individuals on Parole that have resided in La Mesa over the last four years. Please note that the below graph does not include PostRelease Offenders (AB109).

Registered Sex Offenders
There are currently one hundred (100) active sex registrants in the city, ten (10) of whom are transient individuals. Throughout the year, patrol officers conduct compliance checks on the registrants living in La Mesa. Two (2) registrants were out of compliance during the 3rd Quarter of 2023, meaning they have not completed their annual or monthly check-in

Page 28 of 522 ends

5 and residency verification as required. A case has been submitted to the District Attorney for evaluation regarding one of those out of compliance registrants.

Traffic Unit
Traffic Collisions
2023
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD
Total Traffic Collisions 102 71 85 258
Collisions Involving Injury 63 39 56 158
Total Vehicle Occupants Reporting Injury 78 52 69 199
Occupants Reporting Serious Injury 4 1 2 7
Fatality 0 0 0 0
Top Three Collision Locations

1. Baltimore and Fletcher Parkway

2. Baltimore and El Cajon Blvd

3. Fletcher and Grossmont Center
Traffic Enforcement Operations 3rd Quarter
Date Enforcement Operations Focus Location Total Officers 7/4/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 2
7/24/2023 Traffic Enforcement Speed Citywide 5
7/31/2023 Traffic Enforcement Motorcycles Citywide 3
8/4/2023 Traffic Enforcement Speed Citywide 2
8/18/2023 Traffic Enforcement Distracted Driving Citywide 2 8/26/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 11
9/1/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 3
9/2/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 2
9/3/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 2
9/4/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 4
9/6/2023 Traffic Enforcement Speed Citywide 6
9/10/2023 DUI Checkpoint DUI Citywide 2
9/12/2023 Traffic Enforcement Bicycle/ Pedestrian Citywide 3 9/15/2023 Traffic Enforcement Speed Citywide 4

Page 29 of 522 ends

6 Community Engagement and Information Sharing
Social Media
During the 3rd quarter, the Social Media
Team shared information with the public
related to driving under the influence of alcohol and marijuana, distracted driving, legal restrictions on the use of marijuana, and information on the dangers of fentanyl.

School Resource Officer
The School Resource Officer position is currently vacant.

Events and Presentations
On August 2nd, the La Mesa Police Department, Heartland Fire and Rescue, and City officials joined La Mesa Neighborhood Watch groups at their National Night Out events.

National Night Out provides law enforcement and communites an opportunity to build relationships to keep neighborhoods safe. By hosting small gatherings with their neighbors, residents get to know one another and meet their La Mesa public safety personnel and City officials
On September 11th, members of the La Mesa Police Department participated in the annual 9/11 Memorial Stair Climb to honor those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001.

On September 16th, the Department hosted
the annual Safety Fair in the Civic Center
parking lot. Residents had the opportunity to
meet police officers and firefighters, tour
emergency vehicles, and visit community
resource booths.

Social Media Platform Followers
Nextdoor 23,294 La Mesa Residents
Facebook 7,538
Twitter 5,537
Instagram 3,717
Crime Prevention and Outreach Services
Neighborhood Watch Meetings 2
Community Presentations 2
Residential Security Inspections 1
Commercial Security Inspection 4
Detective J. Bourque
and Officer S.

Thompson, LMPD Stair
Climb representatives.

Detective A. Watkins shares
information on the Special
Response Team at the Safety Fair.

Page 30 of 522 ends

7 Staffing and Training
New Officers
Officer Cynthia Gutierrez completed field training in September this quarter.

Police Academy Graduates
Officer Joseph Kabandauli graduated the 134th Police Academy in August of 2023.

Hiring Updates
Police Officer Trainee Chris Hutson was hired during the 3rd quarter of 2023 and will begin the Academy in December of 2023. Lateral Police Officer Miguel Zarate was hired during the 3rd Quarter and will begin his Field Training in October.

Matt Conlon was hired as a Police Lieutenant during the 3rd Quarter.

Vacancies
The Department currently has four vacancies for police officer and one vacancy for police dispatcher. Applications are being accepted for the following positions: Police Officer Lateral/Academy Graduate, Police Officer Trainee, and Police Dispatcher. Please visit the City of La Mesa’s website for more information or to apply.

Promotions
No promotions during the second quarter.

Officer Training
During the 3rd quarter, all sworn personnel completed quarterly firearms qualifications, which also included Less Lethal Training.

Position Authorized Filled Vacancies
Sworn Officers 70 66 4
Dispatchers 12 11 1
Community Service Officers 4 4 0

Page 31 of 522 ends

8 Department Demographics
Department Wellness
The Department remains committed to the wellness of our staff and we offer a variety of resources to our police officers and professional staff. Our Peer Support Team responded to several call-outs during the past quarter to support staff who were impacted by critical incidents. Our Facility Dog, Declan, has also been called upon to provide his unconditional love and support to those team members impacted by trauma, stress, and the oftenchallenging realities of first responder work. The La Mesa Police Department contracts with a local mental health clinician who is culturally competent in assisting first responders with processing life and work trauma. This clinician is an invaluable asset and helps us protect our people so they can continue to protect you.

Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Reporting
The Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 prohibits racial and identity profiling by law enforcement, and requires all agencies to annually report vehicle and pedestrian stop information, as well as citizen complaints of profiling, to the California Attorney General’s Office. The La Mesa Police Department began collecting stop information in 2022 in compliance with the legislation. Data for 2022 was reported to the Department of Justice at the beginning of the 2nd Quarter of 2023. The latest report from the California RIPA Board can be found on the California Attorney General’s website by following the link:
https://oag.ca.gov/ab953/board/reports
Race/Ethnicity Total Officers Percent of Officers
Asian 1 1.5%
Black or African American 5 7.6%
Hispanic or Latino 17 25.8%
White 43 65.2%
Grand Total 66 100.0%

Page 32 of 522 ends

La Mesa Police Department
Quarterly Crime Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2023
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Homicide 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 100.0%
Cleared 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 N/C
Rape 2 5 2 3 3 3 9 15 9 66.7%
Cleared 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Robbery 8 11 20 8 18 10 12 40 39 2.6%
Cleared 5 3 13 4 10 7 7 24 21 14.3%
Aggravated Assault 23 27 33 42 36 45 39 120 83 44.6%
Cleared 9 8 16 20 21 24 18 63 33 90.9%
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Residential 11 23 15 13 22 22 20 64 49 30.6%
Commercial 18 26 31 24 22 27 16 65 75 -13.3%
Burglary Total 29 49 46 37 44 49 36 129 124 4.0%
Cleared 3 4 8 3 7 17 14 38 15 153.3%
Car Prowl (Included in Theft) 61 43 46 58 47 48 36 131 150 -12.7% Theft > $400 116 95 114 116 79 98 68 245 325 -24.6%
Theft $400 or less 120 116 96 117 107 82 56 245 332 -26.2% Theft Total 236 211 210 233 186 180 124 490 657 -25.4%
Cleared 16 17 16 22 42 25 16 83 49 69.4%
Auto Theft 56 38 43 52 46 39 57 142 137 3.6%
Cleared 2 1 0 5 4 0 6 10 3 233.3%
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Total Violent 33 43 56 53 57 58 62 177 132 34.1%
Cleared* 45.5% 25.6% 51.8% 47.2% 54.4% 53.4% 43.5% 50.3% 41.7% 20.7% Total Property 321 298 299 322 276 268 217 761 918 -17.1% Cleared* 6.5% 7.4% 8.0% 9.3% 19.2% 15.7% 16.6% 17.2% 7.3% 135.9% FBI Index 354 341 355 375 333 326 279 938 1050 -10.7%
Cleared* 10.2% 9.7% 14.9% 14.7% 25.2% 22.4% 22.6% 23.5% 11.6% 101.9% Violent Rate per 1000 Pop. 4.0/K 2.9/K
Property Rate per 1000 Pop. 17.0/K 20.4/K
Index Rate per 1000 Pop. 21.0/K 23.3/K
2022
Violent Crime
Property Crime
Totals
2022
2022
2023
2023
2023
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/20/23
*Percentage change by number of crimes cleared.

N/A = Not Applicable

Page 33 of 522 ends

La Mesa Police Department
Robbery and Theft - 3rd Quarter 2023
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Street/Highway 1 2 6 2 6 5 3 14 9 55.6%
Commercial 3 4 10 3 9 4 6 19 17 11.8%
Gas or Service Station 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Chain Store 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 3 -33.3%
Residential 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 N/C
Bank 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -100.0%
Miscellaneous 0 3 2 1 1 0 1 2 5 -60.0%
Robbery Total 8 11 20 8 18 10 12 40 39 2.6%
Cleared 5 3 13 4 10 7 7 24 21 14.3%
YTD Clearance Rate 60%
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Purse Snatching 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 4 -75.0%
Shoplifting 33 36 35 40 47 34 23 104 104 0.0%
From Motor Vehicles 98 86 76 76 66 72 44 182 260 -30.0% Motor Vehicle Parts & Acc. 46 34 54 53 29 29 17 75 134 -44.0% Bicycles 5 10 7 10 5 9 4 18 22 -18.2%
From Buildings 30 27 20 34 29 24 20 73 77 -5.2%
From Coin Operated Mach. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
All Others 22 17 17 19 10 12 15 37 56 -33.9%
Theft Total 236 211 210 233 186 180 124 490 657 -25.4%
Cleared 16 17 16 22 42 25 16 83 49 69.4%
YTD Clearance Rate 17%
2022
Robbery
Theft
2022 2023
2023
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/20/23
N/A = Not Applicable

Page 34 of 522 ends

La Mesa Police Department
Patrol Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2023
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Primary 5428 4770 4658 4562 4405 4986 5227 14618 14856 -1.6% Officer Initiated 1627 1164 1128 1557 2128 2040 2410 6578 3919 67.8% Reports Taken 1252 1193 1296 1426 1361 1260 1343 3964 3741 6.0% Arrests Made 256 269 283 309 380 404 341 1125 808 39.2% 5150 Detentions 96 99 82 69 89 83 106 278 277 0.4%
Citations 390 214 157 194 398 492 707 1597 761 109.9%
Parking/ Muni Code Citations 103 75 77 71 119 138 134 391 255 53.3% Field Interviews 147 137 128 251 228 225 143 596 412 44.7% 2022 2023
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/20/23 N/A = Not Applicable

Page 35 of 522 ends

La Mesa Police Department
Additional Detailed Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2023
Robbery Location Type 2023 Cleared % Solved
Street/Highway 14 5 35.7%
Commercial 19 15 78.9%
Gas or Service Station 0 0 N/C
Chain Store 2 1 50.0%
Residential 3 1 33.3%
Bank 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 2 2 100.0%
Total 40 24 60.0%
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Ghost Gun(s) Recovered Incident 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0.0%
Fentanyl Related Incident 6 7 5 8 3 1 2 6 18 -66.7%
Naloxone Used Incident 6 2 2 2 5 0 2 7 10 -30.0%
Reported Hate Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
A single incident may reflected in each appliable category, dependent on incident circumstances. 2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Race 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Religion* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Sexual Orientation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Gender 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Citizenship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
None/Unknown Bias 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Communications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Violence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Vandalism 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
N/C: Not Calculable
Robbery Clearances
Year to Date Totals
2022
2023
Details of Hate Crimes Reported to Law Enforcement
Incidents of Special Study and County Interest
2023
Crimes by Bias Motivation 2022
Each reported hate crime is listed twice, once under the relevant bias motivation and again under the category of offensive act.

Data are only available for incidents reported to the La Mesa Police Department. *During the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2023, there were a total of three reported incidents of flyers containing antisemitic messages distributed on La Mesa streets. No crimes were committed and, thus, not reflected above, but the incidents were documented and investigated.

There are 37 reportable bias motivations and 14 reportable offensive acts. To facilitate a more readable data table, only the bias motivations and offensive acts for reported hate crimes will be broken down under each category.

Crimes by Offensive Act 2022 2023
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/20/23 N/A = Not Applicable

Page 36 of 522 ends

La Mesa Police Department
Communications - 3rd Quarter 2023
2023 2022 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change 9-1-1 7106 7024 7459 7164 6899 7338 7038 21275 21589 -1.5% 9-1-1 Answer Time 1 100% 99% 100% 100% 98% 98% 99% 98% 100% N/A Total Calls For Service 2 13828 13840 14439 14163 14319 14548 14935 43802 42107 4.0% Source:
9-1-1 6250 6234 6665 6342 6251 6476 6379 19106 19149 -0.2% Text 9-1-1 3 5 10 10 12 18 16 28 62 25 148.0%
Non-Emergency 5342 5656 5870 5458 5202 5367 5438 16007 16868 -5.1% Officer Initiated 2060 1709 1583 2112 2627 2458 2826 7911 5352 47.8% Walk Ins 171 231 311 239 238 231 264 733 713 2.8%
HOME 4 617 657 549 417 435 384 447 1266 1823 -30.6%
4 The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) is an initiative of the City of La Mesa, in collaboration with the La Mesa Police Department. LMPD Dispatchers route the HOME team (City outreach workers) as primary responders to non-emergency calls for service that do not require a police presence.
2022 2023
2 Calls for Service include all calls that generate agency response and officer initiated contact including, assisting citizens, traffic stops, pedestrian stops, front counter contacts, extra patrol, etc. 3 Capacity to accept texts via 9-1-1 began January 2021. 1 9-1-1 Answer Time indicates the average percentage of 9-1-1 calls answered by the State Ringtime Standard. Beginning 03/01/23, the State Ringtime Standard is 90% within 15 seconds, and 95% within 20 seconds.

Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis,10/20/23 N/A = Not Available

Page 37 of 522 ends

Ending the Plastic Pollution Crisis
Melissa Morris
Southern California Field Representative
Oceana is the largest international
non-profit organization solely
dedicated to protecting the oceans.

Page 38 of 522 ends

What is the problem?

Page 39 of 522 ends
Page 40 of 522 ends

PHOTO:

Shutterstock

Page 41 of 522 ends
Page 42 of 522 ends
Page 43 of 522 ends
Page 44 of 522 ends
Page 45 of 522 ends

VIDEO: Thomson Reuters
Drowning in plastic

Page 46 of 522 ends

ILLUSTRATION: Thomson Reuters Page 47 of 522
SOURCE: Geyer et al. 2017, Plastics Europe and World Chemical Outlook 2021

Page 48 of 522 ends

Source: UNEP (adapted from Geyer, Jambeck and Law, 2017) Page 49 of 522

Page 50 of 522 ends

Single-Use Plastics Are the Most
Commonly Collected Items in Beach
Cleanups
Source: ICC 2019 Report
Straws, Stirrers Forks, Knives, Spoons Plastic Beverage Bottles Plastic Grocery Bags Plastic Cups, Plates

Page 51 of 522 ends

Inadequate Solutions

Page 52 of 522 ends
Page 53 of 522 ends

Glass and aluminum
can be recycled an
infinite number of
times while paper can
be recycled up to 6-7
times

Page 54 of 522 ends

How many times can
plastic be recycled?
Very few at best.

It’s generally “downcycled”
only once.

Page 55 of 522 ends

Recycling Does Not Keep Pace With Plastic Waste
Source: Adapted from Geyer et al. 2017 Million Metric Tons

Page 56 of 522 ends
Page 57 of 522 ends
Page 58 of 522 ends

City Ordinances in San Diego County
(Ordinance Matrix)
Carlsbad
Del Mar
Encinitas
Imperial Beach
Oceanside
San Diego
San Marcos
Solana Beach
Vista

Page 59 of 522 ends
Page 60 of 522 ends
Page 61 of 522 ends

1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Special Meeting
Date:

Location:

October 24, 2023, 5:00 p.m.

Council Chambers and City Manager's Conference Room
City Hall, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lothian
Councilmember Dillard
Councilmember Parent
Councilmember Shu
Staff: City Manager Humora
Assistant City Manager Lee
City Attorney Sabine
City Clerk Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments.

Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 5:03 p.m.

3. CLOSED SESSION
Councilmember Dillard joined the meeting at 5:05 p.m.

Councilmember Dillard announced she was attending virtually under the just cause provision of AB 2449 and there were no individuals over the age of 18 present in the room with her.

3.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6

Page 62 of 522 ends

2 Agency Negotiator: Ms. Lee
Employee Organizations:

La Mesa Police Officers' Association
La Mesa Firefighters' Local #4759
La Mesa City Employees Association
Unrepresented Employees
The meeting reconvened at 5:21 p.m. with all members present.

4. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Sabine announced there were no reportable actions except for the Council gave direction to its negotiator.

5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 5:22 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk

Page 63 of 522 ends

1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Date:

Location:

October 24, 2023, 6:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lothian
Councilmember Dillard
Councilmember Parent
Councilmember Shu
Staff: City Manager Humora
Assistant City Manager Lee
City Attorney Sabine
City Clerk Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items can be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Councilmember Dillard announced she was attending virtually under the just cause provision of AB 2449 and there were no individuals over the age of 18 present in the room with her.

1.1 INVOCATION - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Sabine announced there were no reportable actions except for the Council gave direction to its negotiator.

Page 64 of 522 ends

2 3. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

4. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

5. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Wendy Mihalic spoke in opposition to the installation of digital billboards in the City.

Janet Castanos spoke in opposition to the installation of digital billboards in the City.

Suda House spoke regarding a 6-story development project on El Cajon Boulevard.

Rebecca Arevalo spoke in opposition to the installation of digital billboards in the City.

Gerda Holmstrom spoke on the City Ordinance prohibiting billboards.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflict of interest disclosures.

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

8.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND/OR REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE CITY’S YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
Mayor Arapostathis nominated Zaida Donnelly for reappointment and Aydan Carey, Shannon Elwin, Lamek Eyasu, Sonija Lam, and Sophia Marin for appointment to the Youth Advisory Commission.

Resolution No. 2023-117
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Parent
Approve the reappointment of Zaida Donnelly and the appointments of Aydan Carey, Shannon Elwin, Lamek Eyasu, Sonija Lam, and Sophia

Page 65 of 522 ends

3 Marin to the Youth Advisory Commission and adopt Resolution confirming the appointments.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Lothian, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Joe spoke on Item 10.5.

Janet Castanos spoke on Item 10.2.

Gerda Holmstrom spoke on Item 10.2.

Don Wood spoke and submitted a comment on Item 10.2.

Bonnie Baranoff submitted a comment on Item 10.3.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.6)
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 10.6).

Councilmember Shu requested Item 10.2 be pulled for separate consideration.

Vice Mayor Lothian requested Items 10.3 and 10.5 be pulled for separate consideration.

Moved By Councilmember Shu
Seconded By Mayor Arapostathis
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1, 10.4 and 10.6.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Lothian, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

Page 66 of 522 ends

4 10.4 RESOLUTIONS FOR THE LEMON AVENUE PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (BID 24-04)
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF $100,768

FROM THE DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND TO THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR BID 24-04, LEMON AVENUE

PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Resolution No. 2023-118
Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD AB102 GRANT FUNDS
FROM THE BUDGET ACT OF 2023-2024, AND AWARDING OF
FUNDS TO BID NO. 24-04 LEMON AVENUE PUBLIC PARKING

LOT IMPROVEMENTS
Resolution No. 2023-119
Adopt Resolution.
c. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BID AND INCLUDING
ONE ADDITIVE FOR BID 24-04 AND AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE LEMON AVENUE

PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO SNZ
CONTRACTORS, INC.

Resolution No. 2023-120
Adopt Resolution.

10.6 *RESOLUTION ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF A

PORTION OF TWO EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS
LOCATED AT 8401 FLETCHER PARKWAY
Resolution No. 2023-121
Adopt Resolution.

10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS HELD TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26 AND OCTOBER 10,
2023
Councilmember Shu requested clarification on the motion of Item 10.2 of the September 26, 2023, City Council meeting minutes.

Page 67 of 522 ends

5 City Attorney Sabine asked the City Clerk to read the motion verbatim.

City Clerk Wiegelman read the motion verbatim for Item 10.2 of the September 26, 2023, City Council meeting minutes.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Councilmember Shu
Seconded By Councilmember Parent
Approve.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Lothian, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

10.3 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (HOME)
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (JULY 2023 - SEPTEMBER 2023)
Vice Mayor Lothian spoke on the issue of homelessness in the City and asked what steps were being taken to address the homeless that refuse assistance from the HOME program.

Chief Sweeney responded to Vice Mayor Lothian's questions.

Moved By Vice Mayor Lothian
Seconded By Councilmember Parent
Receive and file.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Lothian, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

10.5 RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR PROJECT 2022-0965 (LA

MESA VIEW LLC)
A PROPOSED 40-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
AT 4400 PALM AVENUE, APN 494-641-09-00 IN THE RB-P-D-MU (RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS/ SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY/

URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY/ MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE
Vice Mayor Lothian commented on affordable housing, transient oriented developments, and the notification process for development projects.

Page 68 of 522 ends

6 Mayor Arapostathis and Councilmember Parent explained the rules of order and the matters that may be discussed under the Item.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Parent
Approve.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Against (1): Vice Mayor Lothian
Approved (4 to 1)

11. STAFF REPORT

11.1 CONSIDERATION OF THE COUNCIL SALARY ADJUSTMENT PANEL

RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY COUNCIL SALARIES (INCLUDING

MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER)
Assistant to the City Manager Dedmon introduced Aaron Landua, Council Salary Adjustment Panel Member, who provided an overview of the process taken by the Panel to reach the proposed recommendation.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
(1) Direct staff to draft an ordinance to increase the Mayor, Councilmembers, and Treasurer monthly compensation (to be effective following the November 2024 General Election) as follows: (a) increase Council salaries by 90% from $1,000 per month to $1,900 per month (the Mayor, as a Councilmember, would receive the same increase); (b) increase the Mayoral compensation by 90% from $1,000 to $1,900 (total:
$1,900 Council salary + $1,900 Mayoral salary = $3,800); and (c) increase the Treasurer's monthly salary by 90% from $579 to $1,100; and (2) Direct staff to return to Council in August of non-election years with a recommended adjustment to the monthly compensation for the Mayor, Councilmembers, and Treasurer for Council consideration.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Lothian, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu

Page 69 of 522 ends

7 Approved (5 to 0)

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

13. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
There were no reports.

14. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 7:11 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk

Page 70 of 522 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 14, 2023
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF
LA MESA COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FY 2023-2024,

INCLUDING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY

BANDS FOR DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES,

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER, AND RECORDS

TECHNICIAN, AND POSITIONS AFFECTED BY THE

MINIMUM WAGE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUMMARY:

Issues:

1. Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective November 23, 2023, including new classifications and salary bands for Director of Human Resources, Environmental Manager, and Records Technician; and

2. Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective January 1, 2024, including positions affected by the minimum wage increase?
Recommendation:

1. That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective November 23, 2024, including new classifications and salary bands for Human Resources, Environmental Manager, and Records Technician; and

2. That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective January 1, 2024, including positions affected by the minimum wage increase.

Page 71 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 2 of 4
Fiscal Impact:

Environmental Manager: For Fiscal Year 2023-2024 the fiscal impact for reclassifying the Environmental Program Manager and Stormwater Program Manager to a newly added position increases the City’s Operating Budget by $99,620, which is spread across different budget accounts effecting the General Fund and Non-General Fund accounts. Due to various vacancies in FY 2023-2024 there is unspent salaries/benefits that will be available to program into the Operating Budget.

Records Technician: The position was included in the FYs 2023-2024 and 2024- 2025 Operating Budget. There is no fiscal impact for adding this position to the Classification and Compensation Index.

Minimum Wage Changes: The positions affected by the January 1, 2024 minimum wage increases are already budgeted and appropriated in the General Fund.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
 Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.

BACKGROUND:

It is important to maintain and keep current classification salary ranges to ensure they are in alignment with the scope of responsibility and complexity of assigned work. A primary goal of the City’s classification system is to promote efficiency and responsiveness to meet the needs and demands of the City, by creating new classifications and redefining position responsibilities for existing classifications.

DISCUSSION:

Periodically, staff reviews the City’s Classification and Compensation Index to address recruitment and retention needs. Following a most recent review, staff recommends the following changes:

1. Changes to the City’s Classification and Compensation Index effective November 23, 2023:

Page 72 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 3 of 4
 Director of Human Resources: Staff has been evaluating the needs of the City and determined that a Director with a Human Resources background is needed to provide more focus on recruitment and retention of employees.

The salary band for the Director of Human Resources will match other department Director positions and will not result in an increase in total salaries or number of positions for the department.
 Environmental Manager: Staff recommends establishing a new position titled Environmental Manager. A reclassification review was conducted for the positions of Environmental Program Manager and Stormwater Program Manager. The reclassification review considered many factors such as supervision, hiring, judgement, decision making, policy/program development and implementation, and degree of independence. Based on the review, staff recommends the two incumbents (Environmental Program Manager and Stormwater Program Manager) be reclassified to Environmental Manager. The purpose of the new Environmental Manager class consists of providing a high degree and level of role and responsibility in managing the assigned environmental area for the City (sustainability or stormwater). The incumbents are required to possess a thorough and advanced level of knowledge of concepts, theories, principles, and practices of their environmental field at the time of hire.
 The proposed salary band for the Environmental Manager ($9,430 monthly to $11,463 monthly) is equal to the median of other agencies in San Diego County and is in the same band as other management classifications such as the Assistant to the City Manager, Communications Manager, Finance Manager, Information Technology Manager, Police Services Manager, and Risk Manager.  Records Technician: On August 8, 2023, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 Operating Budget. Included in the fiscal budget was the addition of a Records Technician position. The position was not included in the Classification and Compensation Index. Staff is recommended the position be added at this time to enable recruitment of the position. The position will assist with digital document processing as the City continues its technology implementation to online platforms.

The position was included in the FYs 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 Operating Budget; therefore, there is no fiscal impact resulting in the recommended addition.

2. Changes to the City Classification and Compensation Index effective January 1, 2024:

Page 73 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 4 of 4
On January 1, 2024, the minimum wage will increase to $16.00/hour. The City’s Classification and Compensation Index must be updated to reflect this increase. There are ten classifications that will be affected: General Service Worker, Intern/Student Worker I, Intern/Student Worker II, Lifeguard Aide, Lifeguard/Instructor, Lead Lifeguard, Live Scan Operator, Recreation Aide, Recreation Leader and Recreation Specialist.

The City has accounted for the minimum wage increase during the Operating Budgeting process; therefore, there are no fiscal impacts associated with this change.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective November 23, 2024, including new classifications and salary bands for Director of Human Resources, Environmental Manager, and Records Technician; and

2. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective January 1, 2024, including positions affected by the minimum wage increase.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Amanda Lee
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective November 23, 2024, including new classifications and salary bands for Director of Human Resources, Environmental Manager, and Records Technician
B. That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 effective January 1, 2024, including positions affected by the minimum wage increase.

Page 74 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF LA MESA COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 LISTING POSITIONS, SALARY RANGES/BANDS,

AND PAY STEPS INCLUDING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED

SALARY BANDS FOR DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES,

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER, AND RECORDS TECHNICIAN
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, as follows:

1. That on August 8, 2023 the City Council adopted the City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 listing positions, salary ranges/bands, and pay steps.

2. That the City Council desires to amend and restate the previously approved and adopted City of La Mesa Compensation Plan to include new classifications and associated salary bands for Director of Human Resources, Environmental Manager, and Records Technician.

3. That the compensation of all employees of the City of La Mesa as set forth and prescribed in the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 listing positions, salary ranges/bands, and pay steps is hereby approved and accepted. A copy of said compensation plan is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, as though the same were set forth in full herein.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the position listings, salary ranges/bands, and pay steps as set forth in the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 75 of 522 ends

Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Accountant I 5,344 30.83 5,611 32.37 5,892 33.99 6,187 35.69 6,496 37.48 6,723 38.79 LMCEA 1000 8810 35 Accountant II 5,882 33.93 6,176 35.63 6,485 37.41 6,809 39.28 7,149 41.24 7,399 42.69 LMCEA 1003 8810 46 Accounting Assistant I 3,415 19.70 3,586 20.69 3,765 21.72 3,953 22.81 4,151 23.95 4,296 24.78 LMCEA 1006 8810 3 Accounting Assistant II 3,752 21.65 3,940 22.73 4,137 23.87 4,344 25.06 4,561 26.31 4,721 27.24 LMCEA 1009 8810 6 Accounting Technician 5,069 29.24 5,322 30.70 5,588 32.24 5,867 33.85 6,160 35.54 6,376 36.78 LMCEA 1012 8810 33 Accounting Technician - Confidential 5,322 30.70 5,588 32.24 5,867 33.85 6,160 35.54 6,468 37.32 6,694 38.62 Confidential 1013 8810 1 Administrative Aide 4,455 25.70 4,678 26.99 4,912 28.34 5,158 29.76 5,416 31.25 5,606 32.34 LMCEA 1015 8810 21 Administrative Analyst I 5,344 30.83 5,611 32.37 5,892 33.99 6,187 35.69 6,496 37.48 6,723 38.79 LMCEA 1018 8810 35 Administrative Analyst I - Confidential 5,611 32.37 5,892 33.99 6,187 35.69 6,496 37.48 6,821 39.35 7,060 40.73 Confidential 1019 8810 6 Administrative Analyst II 5,882 33.93 6,176 35.63 6,485 37.41 6,809 39.28 7,149 41.24 7,399 42.69 LMCEA 1021 8810 46 Administrative Analyst II - Confidential 6,176 35.63 6,485 37.41 6,809 39.28 7,149 41.24 7,506 43.30 7,769 44.82 Confidential 1022 8810 7 Administrative Coordinator 4,740 27.35 4,977 28.71 5,226 30.15 5,487 31.66 5,761 33.24 5,963 34.40 LMCEA 1024 8810 25 Administrative Coordinator -
Confidential 4,977 28.71 5,226 30.15 5,487 31.66 5,761 33.24 6,049 34.90 6,261 36.12 Confidential 1025 8810 5 Administrative Office Assistant 3,654 21.08 3,837 22.14 4,029 23.24 4,230 24.40 4,442 25.63 4,597 26.52 LMCEA 1027 8810 5 Animal Control Officer 4,467 25.77 4,690 27.06 4,925 28.41 5,171 29.83 5,430 31.33 5,566 32.11 Police N/S 1030 9420 2 Assistant Center Manager 4,140 23.88 4,347 25.08 4,564 26.33 4,792 27.65 5,032 29.03 5,208 30.05 LMCEA 1033 8810 15 Assistant City Manager 14,893 85.92 18,103 104.44 Mgmt 1036 9410 Assistant Director of Community
Development 11,267 65.00 13,695 79.01 Mgmt 1146 9410
Assistant Director of Public Works 11,267 65.00 13,695 79.01 Mgmt 1145 9410 Assistant Engineer 6,726 38.80 7,062 40.74 7,415 42.78 7,786 44.92 8,175 47.16 8,461 48.81 LMCEA 1039 9410 54 Assistant Planner 5,918 34.14 6,214 35.85 6,525 37.64 6,851 39.53 7,194 41.50 7,446 42.96 LMCEA 1042 9410 48 Assistant to the City Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1037 9410 Associate Engineer 7,751 44.72 8,139 46.96 8,546 49.30 8,973 51.77 9,422 54.36 9,752 56.26 LMCEA 1045 9410 56 Associate Planner 6,510 37.56 6,836 39.44 7,178 41.41 7,537 43.48 7,914 45.66 8,191 47.26 LMCEA 1048 9410 53 Building Inspection Supervisor 7,954 45.89 9,669 55.78 Mgmt 1055 9410 Building Inspector I 5,378 31.03 5,647 32.58 5,929 34.21 6,225 35.91 6,536 37.71 6,765 39.03 LMCEA 1051 9410 36 Building Inspector II 5,916 34.13 6,212 35.84 6,523 37.63 6,849 39.51 7,191 41.49 7,443 42.94 LMCEA 1054 9410 49 Building Maintenance Lead Worker 4,998 28.83 5,248 30.28 5,510 31.79 5,786 33.38 6,075 35.05 6,288 36.28 LMCEA 1057 9420 31 Building Maintenance Supervisor 5,909 34.09 6,204 35.79 6,514 37.58 6,840 39.46 7,182 41.43 7,433 42.88 LMCEA 1060 9420 47 Building Maintenance Worker I 4,131 23.83 4,338 25.03 4,555 26.28 4,783 27.59 5,022 28.97 5,198 29.99 LMCEA 1063 9420 13

CITY OF LA MESA / HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION COMPENSATION PLAN FY 2023-2024
EFFECTIVE 11/23/2023, AS AMENDED & APPROVED 11/14/2023
Class Title
Step A
(Minimum) Step B Step C Step D Step E
(Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
#

Page 76 of 522 ends

Building Maintenance Worker II 4,546 26.23 4,773 27.54 5,012 28.92 5,263 30.36 5,526 31.88 5,719 32.99 LMCEA 1066 9420 23 Building Official 11,068 63.85 13,453 77.61 Mgmt 1069 9410 Business License Officer 4,129 23.82 4,335 25.01 4,552 26.26 4,780 27.58 5,019 28.96 5,195 29.97 LMCEA 1072 9410 14 Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour City Attorney 24,192 139.57 Mgmt 1078 8810
City Clerk 10,003 57.71 12,158 70.14 Mgmt 1081 8810
City Councilmember 1,000 5.77 Elected 1084 9410 2
City Engineer 11,267 65.00 13,695 79.01 Mgmt 1086 9410
City Manager 22,896 132.09 Mgmt 1087 9410
City Treasurer 579 3.34 Elected 1090 8810 1
Clerical Assistant I 3,012 17.38 3,163 18.25 3,321 19.16 3,487 20.12 3,661 21.12 3,789 21.86 LMCEA 1093 8810 1 Clerical Assistant II 3,250 18.75 3,413 19.69 3,584 20.68 3,763 21.71 3,951 22.79 4,089 23.59 LMCEA 1096 8810 2 Clinical Homeless Outreach Specialist 5,882 33.93 6,176 35.63 6,485 37.41 6,809 39.28 7,149 41.24 7,399 42.69 LMCEA 1097 9420 46 Code Compliance Officer I 4,921 28.39 5,167 29.81 5,425 31.30 5,696 32.86 5,981 34.51 6,190 35.71 LMCEA 1099 9410 28 Code Compliance Officer II 5,417 31.25 5,688 32.82 5,972 34.45 6,271 36.18 6,585 37.99 6,815 39.32 LMCEA 1102 9410 39 Comm Develop Program Coordinator 6,762 39.01 7,100 40.96 7,455 43.01 7,828 45.16 8,219 47.42 8,507 49.08 LMCEA 1105 9410 55 Communications Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1106 8810 Communications Supervisor 6,575 37.93 6,904 39.83 7,249 41.82 7,611 43.91 7,992 46.11 8,192 47.26 Police N/S 1104 8810 6 Community Resource Supervisor 6,572 37.92 6,901 39.81 7,246 41.80 7,608 43.89 7,988 46.08 8,268 47.70 LMCEA 1103 9410 61 Community Services Manager 8,034 46.35 9,766 56.34 Mgmt 1140 9410 Community Services Officer 4,467 25.77 4,690 27.06 4,925 28.41 5,171 29.83 5,430 31.33 5,566 32.11 Police N/S 1108 9420 2 Crime Analyst 5,806 33.50 6,096 35.17 6,401 36.93 6,721 38.78 7,057 40.71 7,304 42.14 LMCEA 1111 8810 45 Crime Prevention Specialist I 4,204 24.25 4,414 25.47 4,635 26.74 4,867 28.08 5,110 29.48 5,289 30.51 LMCEA 1114 9410 16 Crime Prevention Specialist II 4,921 28.39 5,167 29.81 5,425 31.30 5,696 32.86 5,981 34.51 6,190 35.71 LMCEA 1117 9410 28 Custodian 3,250 18.75 3,413 19.69 3,584 20.68 3,763 21.71 3,951 22.79 4,089 23.59 LMCEA 1120 9420 2 Customer Service / Finance Assistant 3,828 22.08 4,019 23.19 4,220 24.35 4,431 25.56 4,653 26.84 4,816 27.78 LMCEA 1123 8810 7 Customer Service Specialist I 4,021 23.20 4,222 24.36 4,433 25.58 4,655 26.86 4,888 28.20 5,059 29.19 LMCEA 1126 8810 11 Customer Service Specialist II 4,338 25.03 4,555 26.28 4,783 27.59 5,022 28.97 5,273 30.42 5,458 31.49 LMCEA 1129 8810 17 Deputy City Clerk 5,188 29.93 5,447 31.43 5,719 32.99 6,005 34.64 6,305 36.38 6,526 37.65 LMCEA 1132 8810 34 Deputy Fire Chief 13,738 79.26 16,698 96.33 Mgmt 1178 7706 Deputy Fire Marshal 6,865 39.61 7,208 41.58 7,568 43.66 7,946 45.84 8,343 48.13 8,635 49.82 LMCEA 1135 9410 64 Development Coordinator Temporary 2136 9410 33
Development Services Technician I 4,371 25.22 4,590 26.48 4,820 27.81 5,061 29.20 5,314 30.66 5,500 31.73 LMCEA 1148 9410 19

27.33 28.70 30.14 31.65 33.23
Salary Established by Ordinance
Salary Established by Contract
Salary Established by Ordinance - rev 12/06
Step I Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
#
Salary Established by Contract
Class Title
Step A
(Minimum) Step B Step C Step D Step E(Maximum) Step F Step G Step H

Page 77 of 522 ends

Development Services Technician II 4,800 27.69 5,040 29.08 5,292 30.53 5,557 32.06 5,835 33.66 6,039 34.84 LMCEA 1149 9410 57 Director of Community Development 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1138 9410 Director of Community Services 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1141 9410 Director of Finance 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1142 9410 Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Director of Human Resources 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1151 9410 Director of Public Works 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1143 9410 Director of Public Works / City
Engineer 13,177 76.02 16,017 92.41 Mgmt 1144 9410
Downtown Operations Assistant 3,968 22.89 4,166 24.03 4,374 25.23 4,593 26.50 4,823 27.83 4,992 28.80 LMCEA 1147 9410 9 Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 6,762 39.01 7,100 40.96 7,455 43.01 7,828 45.16 8,219 47.42 8,507 49.08 LMCEA 1184 9410 62 Engineering Aide 4,371 25.22 4,590 26.48 4,820 27.81 5,061 29.20 5,314 30.66 5,500 31.73 LMCEA 1150 9410 19 Engineering Project Manager 9,530 54.98 11,584 66.83 Mgmt 1153 9410 Engineering Technician I 4,933 28.46 5,180 29.88 5,439 31.38 5,711 32.95 5,997 34.60 6,207 35.81 LMCEA 1156 9410 29 Engineering Technician II 5,422 31.28 5,693 32.84 5,978 34.49 6,277 36.21 6,591 38.03 6,822 39.36 LMCEA 1159 9410 40 Environmental Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1158 9420 Environmental Program Manager 7,492 43.22 7,867 45.39 8,260 47.65 8,673 50.04 9,107 52.54 9,426 54.38 LMCEA 1160 9420 58 Environmental Specialist 5,935 34.24 6,232 35.95 6,544 37.75 6,871 39.64 7,215 41.63 7,468 43.08 LMCEA 1355 9420 50 Equipment Operator 4,595 26.51 4,825 27.84 5,066 29.23 5,319 30.69 5,585 32.22 5,780 33.35 LMCEA 1162 9420 24 Equipment Service Worker 3,604 20.79 3,784 21.83 3,973 22.92 4,172 24.07 4,381 25.28 4,534 26.16 LMCEA 1165 9420 4 Executive Assistant to the City
Manager 5,886 33.96 6,180 35.65 6,489 37.44 6,813 39.31 7,154 41.27 7,404 42.72 Confidential 1339 8810 2 Executive Secretary to the Police Chief 4,740 27.35 4,977 28.71 5,226 30.15 5,487 31.66 5,761 33.24 5,963 34.40 LMCEA 1023 8810 25 Facilities Manager 5,536 31.94 5,813 33.54 6,104 35.22 6,409 36.98 6,729 38.82 6,965 40.18 LMCEA 1168 9410 41 Facilities Specialist 4,740 27.35 4,977 28.71 5,226 30.15 5,487 31.66 5,761 33.24 5,963 34.40 LMCEA 1169 8810 25 Finance Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1172 8810 Fire Battalion Chief (112 hour) 10,586 43.62 11,115 45.80 11,671 48.09 12,255 50.50 12,868 53.03 13,190 54.35 Fire 1182 7706 7 Fire Battalion Chief (80 hour) 10,586 61.07 11,115 64.13 11,671 67.33 12,255 70.70 12,868 74.24 13,190 76.10 Fire 1176 7706 8 Fire Battalion Chief / Paramedic
(112 hour) 11,941 49.21 12,470 51.39 13,026 53.68 13,610 56.09 14,223 58.61 14,545 59.94 Fire 1194 7706 13 Fire Battalion Chief / Paramedic
(80 hour) 11,941 68.89 12,470 71.94 13,026 75.15 13,610 78.52 14,223 82.06 14,545 83.91 Fire 1193 7706 14 Fire Battalion Chief w/ PM Cert (112
hour) 11,264 46.42 11,793 48.60 12,349 50.89 12,933 53.30 13,546 55.82 13,868 57.15 Fire 1181 7706 11 Fire Battalion Chief w/ PM Cert (80
hour) 11,264 64.98 11,793 68.04 12,349 71.24 12,933 74.61 13,546 78.15 13,868 80.01 Fire 1179 7706 12 Fire Captain 8,573 35.33 9,002 37.10 9,452 38.95 9,925 40.90 10,421 42.94 10,682 44.02 Fire 1174 7706 5 Fire Captain / Paramedic 9,928 40.91 10,357 42.68 10,807 44.53 11,280 46.48 11,776 48.53 12,037 49.60 Fire 1175 7706 6 Fire Captain w/ PM Cert 9,251 38.12 9,680 39.89 10,130 41.74 10,603 43.69 11,099 45.74 11,360 46.81 Fire 1173 7706 10 Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
# Class Title
Step A
(Minimum) Step B Step C Step D Step E(Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I

Page 78 of 522 ends

Fire Chief 15,988 92.24 19,432 112.11 Mgmt 1177 7706
Fire Division Chief 12,077 69.68 14,680 84.69 Mgmt 1180 7706 Fire Engineer 7,537 31.06 7,914 32.61 8,310 34.24 8,726 35.96 9,162 37.76 9,391 38.70 Fire 1186 7706 2 Fire Engineer / Paramedic 8,892 36.64 9,269 38.20 9,665 39.83 10,081 41.54 10,517 43.34 10,746 44.28 Fire 1187 7706 4 Fire Engineer w/ PM Cert 8,215 33.85 8,592 35.41 8,988 37.04 9,404 38.75 9,840 40.55 10,069 41.49 Fire 1188 7706 9 Fire Inspector I 5,378 31.03 5,647 32.58 5,929 34.21 6,225 35.91 6,536 37.71 6,765 39.03 LMCEA 1052 9410 36 Fire Inspector II 5,916 34.13 6,212 35.84 6,523 37.63 6,849 39.51 7,191 41.49 7,443 42.94 LMCEA 1053 9410 49 Fire Marshal 11,069 63.86 13,454 77.62 NS Mgmt 1183 9410 Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Firefighter 6,284 25.90 6,598 27.19 6,928 28.55 7,274 29.98 7,638 31.48 7,829 32.26 Fire 1189 7706 1 Firefighter / Paramedic 7,432 30.63 7,804 32.16 8,194 33.77 8,604 35.46 9,034 37.23 9,260 38.16 Fire 1190 7706 3 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 5,909 34.09 6,204 35.79 6,514 37.58 6,840 39.46 7,182 41.43 7,433 42.88 LMCEA 1226 9420 47 General Service Worker Temporary 1192 9410 2
Heavy Equipment Operator 4,822 27.82 5,063 29.21 5,316 30.67 5,582 32.20 5,861 33.81 6,066 35.00 LMCEA 1195 9420 27 Homeless Outreach Technician 5,344 30.83 5,611 32.37 5,892 33.99 6,187 35.69 6,496 37.48 6,723 38.79 LMCEA 1196 9420 35 Human Resources Analyst 6,547 37.77 6,874 39.66 7,218 41.64 7,579 43.73 7,958 45.91 8,237 47.52 Confidential 1203 8810 3 Human Resources Assistant 3,841 22.16 4,033 23.27 4,235 24.43 4,447 25.66 4,669 26.94 4,832 27.88 Confidential 1205 8810 4 Human Resources Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1201 8810 Human Resources Technician 5,093 29.38 5,348 30.85 5,615 32.39 5,896 34.02 6,191 35.72 6,408 36.97 Confidential 1202 8810 1 Human Resources/Risk Manager 10,377 59.87 12,614 72.77 Mgmt 1200 8810 Human Services Manager 6,762 39.01 7,100 40.96 7,455 43.01 7,828 45.16 8,219 47.42 8,507 49.08 LMCEA 1204 9410 55 Information Technology Analyst 6,726 38.80 7,062 40.74 7,415 42.78 7,786 44.92 8,175 47.16 8,461 48.81 LMCEA 1208 9410 54 Information Technology Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1207 9410 Information Technology Specialist I 5,609 32.36 5,889 33.98 6,183 35.67 6,492 37.45 6,817 39.33 7,056 40.71 LMCEA 1210 9410 44 InformationTechnology Specialist II 6,168 35.58 6,476 37.36 6,800 39.23 7,140 41.19 7,497 43.25 7,759 44.76 LMCEA 1213 9410 52 Intern/Student Worker I Temporary 1216 9410 3
Intern/Student Worker II Temporary 1219 9410 7
Irrigation Technician 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,328 30.74 5,514 31.81 LMCEA 1222 9420 20 Juvenile Services Officer Temporary 1118 9410 28
Lead Lifeguard Temporary 1230 9410 25
Lead Mechanic 5,569 32.13 5,847 33.73 6,139 35.42 6,446 37.19 6,768 39.05 7,005 40.41 LMCEA 1225 9420 43 Lifeguard Aide Temporary 1227 9410 5
Lifeguard/Instructor 16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78 Temporary 1228 9410 9

15.50 16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84

17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78 20.77

23.81 25.00 26.25 27.56 28.94

16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78

15.50 16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84

15.50 15.50 15.50 15.50 15.50
Step I Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
# Class Title Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H

Page 79 of 522 ends

Live Scan Operator Temporary 1229 8810 6
Management Analyst 6,708 38.70 8,153 47.04 Mgmt 1231 8810 Mayor 2,000 11.54 Elected 1234 9410 3
Mechanic I 4,541 26.20 4,768 27.51 5,006 28.88 5,256 30.32 5,519 31.84 5,712 32.95 LMCEA 1237 9420 22 Mechanic II 4,994 28.81 5,244 30.25 5,506 31.77 5,781 33.35 6,070 35.02 6,282 36.24 LMCEA 1240 9420 30 Park Maintenance Lead Worker 5,051 29.14 5,304 30.60 5,569 32.13 5,847 33.73 6,139 35.42 6,354 36.66 LMCEA 1243 9420 32 Park Maintenance Supervisor 5,909 34.09 6,204 35.79 6,514 37.58 6,840 39.46 7,182 41.43 7,433 42.88 LMCEA 1246 9420 47 Park Maintenance Worker I 3,604 20.79 3,784 21.83 3,973 22.92 4,172 24.07 4,381 25.28 4,534 26.16 LMCEA 1249 9420 4 Park Maintenance Worker II 3,986 23.00 4,185 24.14 4,394 25.35 4,614 26.62 4,845 27.95 5,015 28.93 LMCEA 1252 9420 10 Park Maintenance Worker III 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,328 30.74 5,514 31.81 LMCEA 1255 9420 20 Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Permit Technician 3,907 22.54 4,102 23.67 4,307 24.85 4,522 26.09 4,748 27.39 4,914 28.35 LMCEA 1258 8810 8 Planning Technician 4,800 27.69 5,040 29.08 5,292 30.53 5,557 32.06 5,835 33.66 6,039 34.84 LMCEA 1261 9410 57 Police Assistant 4,039 23.30 4,241 24.47 4,453 25.69 4,676 26.98 4,910 28.33 5,082 29.32 LMCEA 1264 8810 12 Police Captain 13,528 78.05 16,443 94.86 Mgmt 1267 7720 Police Chief 16,882 97.40 20,520 118.38 Mgmt 1270 7720
Police Dispatcher 5,276 30.44 5,540 31.96 5,817 33.56 6,108 35.24 6,413 37.00 6,573 37.92 Police N/S 1276 8810 5 Police Lieutenant 12,265 70.76 14,908 86.01 Mgmt 1279 7720 Police Officer 7,043 40.63 7,395 42.66 7,765 44.80 8,153 47.04 8,561 49.39 8,989 51.86 9,438 54.45 9,910 57.17 10,406 60.03 Police 1282 7720 1 Police Officer Trainee 7,043 40.63 7,395 42.66 7,765 44.80 8,153 47.04 8,561 49.39 8,989 51.86 9,438 54.45 9,910 57.17 10,406 60.03 Police 1283 7720 1 Police Property Officer I 4,335 25.01 4,552 26.26 4,780 27.58 5,019 28.96 5,270 30.40 5,402 31.17 Police N/S 1284 9410 7 Police Property Officer II 4,772 27.53 5,011 28.91 5,262 30.36 5,525 31.88 5,801 33.47 5,946 34.30 Police N/S 1285 9410 3 Police Sergeant 9,071 52.33 9,525 54.95 10,001 57.70 10,501 60.58 11,026 63.61 11,577 66.79 12,156 70.13 12,764 73.64 13,402 77.32 Police 1288 7720 2 Police Services Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1290 9410 Police Services Specialist 4,831 27.87 5,073 29.27 5,327 30.73 5,593 32.27 5,873 33.88 6,020 34.73 Police N/S 1293 8810 4 Police Services Technician 4,466 25.77 4,689 27.05 4,923 28.40 5,169 29.82 5,427 31.31 5,563 32.09 Police N/S 1291 8810 1 Public Works Crew Leader 5,569 32.13 5,847 33.73 6,139 35.42 6,446 37.19 6,768 39.05 7,005 40.41 LMCEA 1301 9420 60 Public Works Inspector I 5,392 31.11 5,662 32.67 5,945 34.30 6,242 36.01 6,554 37.81 6,783 39.13 LMCEA 1294 9420 37 Public Works Inspector II 5,938 34.26 6,235 35.97 6,547 37.77 6,874 39.66 7,218 41.64 7,471 43.10 LMCEA 1297 9420 51 Public Works Maint Lead Worker 5,051 29.14 5,304 30.60 5,569 32.13 5,847 33.73 6,139 35.42 6,354 36.66 LMCEA 1300 9420 32 Public Works Maintenance Supervisor 5,909 34.09 6,204 35.79 6,514 37.58 6,840 39.46 7,182 41.43 7,433 42.88 LMCEA 1303 9420 47 Public Works Maintenance Worker I 3,604 20.79 3,784 21.83 3,973 22.92 4,172 24.07 4,381 25.28 4,534 26.16 LMCEA 1306 9420 4 Public Works Maintenance Worker II 3,986 23.00 4,185 24.14 4,394 25.35 4,614 26.62 4,845 27.95 5,015 28.93 LMCEA 1309 9420 10 Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
# Class Title Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H Step I Salary Established by Ordinance - rev 12/06

15.50 16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84

Page 80 of 522 ends

Public Works Maintenance Worker III 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,328 30.74 5,514 31.81 LMCEA 1312 9420 20 Public Works Operations Manager 7,716 44.52 9,379 54.11 Mgmt 1314 9420 Purchasing Officer 7,716 44.52 9,379 54.11 Mgmt 1315 8810 Records & Elections Manager 8,362 48.24 10,164 58.64 Mgmt 1318 8810 Records Technician 4,466 25.77 4,689 27.05 4,923 28.40 5,169 29.82 5,427 31.31 5,563 32.09 LMCEA 1317 8810 Recreation Aide Temporary 1321 9410 1
Recreation Leader Temporary 1324 9410 4
Recreation Specialist Temporary 1327 9410 8
Recreation Supervisor 5,545 31.99 5,822 33.59 6,113 35.27 6,419 37.03 6,740 38.88 6,976 40.25 LMCEA 1330 9410 42 Risk Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1333 9410
Safety Volunteer Coordinator 5,402 31.17 5,672 32.72 5,956 34.36 6,254 36.08 6,567 37.89 6,797 39.21 LMCEA 1336 9410 38 Senior Accountant 7,716 44.52 9,379 54.11 Mgmt 1342 8810 Senior Accounting Technician 5,575 32.16 5,854 33.77 6,147 35.46 6,454 37.23 6,777 39.10 7,014 40.47 LMCEA 1014 9420 63 Payroll Group
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Senior Building Inspector 6,510 37.56 6,836 39.44 7,178 41.41 7,537 43.48 7,914 45.66 8,191 47.26 LMCEA 1345 9410 53 Senior Management Analyst 7,716 44.52 9,379 54.11 Mgmt 1348 8810 Senior Planner 9,190 53.02 11,172 64.45 Mgmt 1351 9410
Senior Tree Trimmer 4,800 27.69 5,040 29.08 5,292 30.53 5,557 32.06 5,835 33.66 6,039 34.84 LMCEA 1354 9420 26 Stormwater Program Manager 7,492 43.22 7,867 45.39 8,260 47.65 8,673 50.04 9,107 52.54 9,426 54.38 LMCEA 1356 9420 58 Superintendent of Public Works 8,630 49.79 10,491 60.53 Mgmt 1357 9420 Transportation Specialist 4,210 24.29 4,421 25.51 4,642 26.78 4,874 28.12 5,118 29.53 5,297 30.56 LMCEA 1328 8810 59 Tree Trimmer 4,361 25.16 4,579 26.42 4,808 27.74 5,048 29.12 5,300 30.58 5,486 31.65 LMCEA 1360 9420 18 Wastewater Maintenance Worker I 3,604 20.79 3,784 21.83 3,973 22.92 4,172 24.07 4,381 25.28 4,534 26.16 LMCEA 1307 9420 4 Wastewater Maintenance Worker II 3,986 23.00 4,185 24.14 4,394 25.35 4,614 26.62 4,845 27.95 5,015 28.93 LMCEA 1310 9420 10 Wastewater Maintenance Worker III 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,328 30.74 5,514 31.81 LMCEA 1313 9420 20

Class
Code
WC
Code
Range
# Class Title Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F Step G Step H Step I

17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78 20.77

16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78

15.50 16.28 17.09 17.94 18.84

Page 81 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING THE AMENDED CITY OF LA MESA COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024, INCLUDING POSITIONS AFFECTED BY THE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

WHEREAS, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) requires that all CalPERS employers list their compensation levels on one document, approved and adopted by the governing body, in accordance with California Code of Regulations section 570.5, and meet all of the following requirements:

1. Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws;

2. Identifies the position title for every employee position;

3. Shows the pay rate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range;

4. Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually;

5. Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's internet website;

6. Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions;

7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and

8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend and restate the previously approved and adopted City of La Mesa Compensation Plan to include changes to the pay rates of positions affected by the minimum wage increase effective January 1, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, as follows:

1. That the City Council amend and adopt the City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 to include pay rate changes of several positions affected by the minimum wage increase effective January 1, 2024.

2. That the compensation of all employees of the City of La Mesa as set forth and prescribed in the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plans for FY 2021-2022 listing positions, salary ranges/bands and pay steps is hereby approved and accepted. A copy of said compensation plan is attached hereto and made a part of by reference as though the same were set forth in full herein.

Page 82 of 522 ends

3. That the position listings, salary ranges/bands and pay steps as set forth in the amended City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2023-2024 shall be in full force and effect beginning January 1, 2024.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 83 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Accountant I 5,531 31.91 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,235 41.74 LMCEA 1000 8810 35 Accountant II 6,088 35.12 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 7,964 45.95 LMCEA 1003 8810 46 Accounting Assistant I 3,535 20.39 3,712 21.42 3,898 22.49 4,093 23.61 4,298 24.80 4,513 26.04 4,626 26.69 LMCEA 1006 8810 3 Accounting Assistant II 3,883 22.40 4,077 23.52 4,281 24.70 4,495 25.93 4,720 27.23 4,956 28.59 5,080 29.31 LMCEA 1009 8810 6 Accounting Technician 5,246 30.27 5,508 31.78 5,783 33.36 6,072 35.03 6,376 36.78 6,695 38.63 6,862 39.59 LMCEA 1012 8810 33 Accounting Technician - Confidential 5,509 31.78 5,784 33.37 6,073 35.04 6,377 36.79 6,696 38.63 7,031 40.56 7,207 41.58 Confidential 1013 8810 1 Administrative Aide 4,611 26.60 4,842 27.93 5,084 29.33 5,338 30.80 5,605 32.34 5,885 33.95 6,032 34.80 LMCEA 1015 8810 21 Administrative Analyst I 5,531 31.91 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,235 41.74 LMCEA 1018 8810 35 Administrative Analyst I - Confidential 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,412 42.76 7,597 43.83 Confidential 1019 8810 6 Administrative Analyst II 6,088 35.12 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 7,964 45.95 LMCEA 1021 8810 46 Administrative Analyst II - Confidential 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 8,159 47.07 8,363 48.25 Confidential 1022 8810 7 Administrative Coordinator 4,906 28.30 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,418 37.03 LMCEA 1024 8810 25 Administrative Coordinator -
Confidential 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,574 37.93 6,738 38.87 Confidential 1025 8810 5 Administrative Office Assistant 3,782 21.82 3,971 22.91 4,170 24.06 4,379 25.26 4,598 26.53 4,828 27.85 4,949 28.55 LMCEA 1027 8810 5 Animal Control Officer 4,467 25.77 4,690 27.06 4,925 28.41 5,171 29.83 5,430 31.33 5,566 32.11 Police N/S 1030 9420 2 Assistant Center Manager 4,285 24.72 4,499 25.96 4,724 27.25 4,960 28.62 5,208 30.05 5,468 31.55 5,605 32.34 LMCEA 1033 8810 15 Assistant City Manager 15,414 88.93 16,185 93.38 16,994 98.04 17,844 102.95 18,736 108.09 Mgmt 1036 9410 Assistant Director of Community
Development 11,661 67.28 12,244 70.64 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 14,174 81.77 Mgmt 1146 9410 Assistant Director of Public Works 11,661 67.28 12,244 70.64 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 14,174 81.77 Mgmt 1145 9410 Assistant Engineer 6,961 40.16 7,309 42.17 7,674 44.27 8,058 46.49 8,461 48.81 8,884 51.25 9,106 52.53 LMCEA 1039 9410 54 Assistant Planner 6,125 35.34 6,431 37.10 6,753 38.96 7,091 40.91 7,446 42.96 7,818 45.10 8,013 46.23 LMCEA 1042 9410 48 Assistant to the City Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1037 9410 Associate Engineer 8,022 46.28 8,423 48.59 8,844 51.02 9,286 53.57 9,750 56.25 10,238 59.07 10,494 60.54 LMCEA 1045 9410 56 Associate Planner 6,738 38.87 7,075 40.82 7,429 42.86 7,800 45.00 8,190 47.25 8,600 49.62 8,815 50.86 LMCEA 1048 9410 53 Building Inspection Supervisor 8,232 47.49 8,644 49.87 9,076 52.36 9,530 54.98 10,007 57.73 Mgmt 1055 9410 Building Inspector I 5,566 32.11 5,844 33.72 6,136 35.40 6,443 37.17 6,765 39.03 7,103 40.98 7,281 42.01 LMCEA 1051 9410 36 Building Inspector II 6,123 35.33 6,429 37.09 6,750 38.94 7,088 40.89 7,442 42.93 7,814 45.08 8,009 46.21 LMCEA 1054 9410 49 Building Maintenance Lead Worker 5,173 29.84 5,432 31.34 5,704 32.91 5,989 34.55 6,288 36.28 6,602 38.09 6,767 39.04 LMCEA 1057 9420 31 Building Maintenance Supervisor 6,116 35.28 6,422 37.05 6,743 38.90 7,080 40.85 7,434 42.89 7,806 45.03 8,001 46.16 LMCEA 1060 9420 47 Building Maintenance Worker I 4,276 24.67 4,490 25.90 4,715 27.20 4,951 28.56 5,199 29.99 5,459 31.49 5,595 32.28 LMCEA 1063 9420 13 Building Maintenance Worker II 4,705 27.14 4,940 28.50 5,187 29.93 5,446 31.42 5,718 32.99 6,004 34.64 6,154 35.50 LMCEA 1066 9420 23 Building Official 10,466 60.38 10,989 63.40 11,538 66.57 12,115 69.89 12,721 73.39 Mgmt 1069 9410 Business License Officer 4,274 24.66 4,488 25.89 4,712 27.18 4,948 28.55 5,195 29.97 5,455 31.47 5,591 32.26 LMCEA 1072 9410 14 City Attorney Salary Established by Contract 21,736 125.40 Mgmt 1078 8810 Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I

CITY OF LA MESA / HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
COMPENSATION PLAN FY 2024-2025
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2024, AS AMENDED & APPROVED 11/14/2023
Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code

Page 1 of 6 ends
Page 84 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code
City Clerk 10,353 59.73 10,871 63 11,415 66 11,986 69 12,585 72.61 Mgmt 1081 8810 City Councilmember Salary Established by Ordinance - rev 12/06 1,000 5.77 Elected 1084 9410 2 City Engineer 11,661 67.28 12,244 70.64 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 14,174 81.77 Mgmt 1086 9410 City Manager Salary Established by Contract 20,572 118.68 Mgmt 1087 9410 City Treasurer Salary Established by Ordinance 579 3.34 Elected 1090 8810 1 Clerical Assistant I 3,117 17.98 3,273 18.88 3,437 19.83 3,609 20.82 3,789 21.86 3,978 22.95 4,077 23.52 LMCEA 1093 8810 1 Clerical Assistant II 3,364 19.41 3,532 20.38 3,709 21.40 3,894 22.47 4,089 23.59 4,293 24.77 4,400 25.38 LMCEA 1096 8810 2 Clinical Homeless Outreach Specialist 6,088 35.12 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 7,964 45.95 LMCEA 1097 9420 46 Code Compliance Officer I 5,093 29.38 5,348 30.85 5,615 32.39 5,896 34.02 6,191 35.72 6,501 37.51 6,664 38.45 LMCEA 1099 9410 28 Code Compliance Officer II 5,607 32.35 5,887 33.96 6,181 35.66 6,490 37.44 6,815 39.32 7,156 41.28 7,335 42.32 LMCEA 1102 9410 39 Comm Develop Program Coordinator 6,999 40.38 7,349 42.40 7,716 44.52 8,102 46.74 8,507 49.08 8,932 51.53 9,155 52.82 LMCEA 1105 9410 55 Communications Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59 10,760 62 11,298 65 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1106 8810 Communications Supervisor 6,575 37.93 6,904 39.83 7,249 41.82 7,611 43.91 7,992 46.11 8,192 47.26 Police N/S 1104 8810 6 Community Resource Supervisor 6,802 39.24 7,142 41.20 7,499 43.26 7,874 45.43 8,268 47.70 8,681 50.08 8,898 51.33 LMCEA 1103 9410 61 Community Services Manager 8,315 47.97 8,731 50.37 9,168 52.89 9,626 55.53 10,107 58.31 Mgmt 1140 9410 Community Services Officer 4,467 25.77 4,690 27.06 4,925 28.41 5,171 29.83 5,430 31.33 5,566 32.11 Police N/S 1108 9420 2 Crime Analyst 6,009 34.67 6,309 36.40 6,624 38.22 6,955 40.13 7,303 42.13 7,668 44.24 7,860 45.35 LMCEA 1111 8810 45 Crime Prevention Specialist I 4,351 25.10 4,569 26.36 4,797 27.68 5,037 29.06 5,289 30.51 5,553 32.04 5,692 32.84 LMCEA 1114 9410 16 Crime Prevention Specialist II 5,093 29.38 5,348 30.85 5,615 32.39 5,896 34.02 6,191 35.72 6,501 37.51 6,664 38.45 LMCEA 1117 9410 28 Custodian 3,364 19.41 3,532 20.38 3,709 21.40 3,894 22.47 4,089 23.59 4,293 24.77 4,400 25.38 LMCEA 1120 9420 2 Customer Service / Finance Assistant 3,962 22.86 4,160 24.00 4,368 25.20 4,586 26.46 4,815 27.78 5,056 29.17 5,182 29.90 LMCEA 1123 8810 7 Customer Service Specialist I 4,162 24.01 4,370 25.21 4,589 26.48 4,818 27.80 5,059 29.19 5,312 30.65 5,445 31.41 LMCEA 1126 8810 11 Customer Service Specialist II 4,490 25.90 4,715 27.20 4,951 28.56 5,199 29.99 5,459 31.49 5,732 33.07 5,875 33.89 LMCEA 1129 8810 17 Deputy City Clerk 5,370 30.98 5,639 32.53 5,921 34.16 6,217 35.87 6,528 37.66 6,854 39.54 7,025 40.53 LMCEA 1132 8810 34 Deputy Fire Chief 11,962 69.01 12,560 72.46 13,188 76.08 13,847 79.89 14,539 83.88 Mgmt 1178 7706 Deputy Fire Marshal 7,105 40.99 7,460 43.04 7,833 45.19 8,225 47.45 8,636 49.82 9,068 52.32 9,295 53.63 LMCEA 1135 9410 64 Development Coordinator 28.29 29.70 31.19 32.75 34.39 Temporary 2136 9410 33 Development Services Technician I 4,524 26.10 4,750 27.40 4,988 28.78 5,237 30.21 5,499 31.73 5,774 33.31 5,918 34.14 LMCEA 1148 9410 19 Development Services Technician II 4,968 28.66 5,216 30.09 5,477 31.60 5,751 33.18 6,039 34.84 6,341 36.58 6,500 37.50 LMCEA 1149 9410 57 Director of Administrative Services 13,638 78.68 14,320 83 15,036 87 15,788 91 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1137 9410 Director of Community Development 13,638 78.68 14,320 83 15,036 87 15,788 91 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1138 9410 Director of Community Services 13,638 78.68 14,320 83 15,036 87 15,788 91 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1141 9410 Director of Finance 13,638 78.68 14,320 83 15,036 87 15,788 91 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1142 9410 Director of Human Resources 13,638 78.68 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1151 9410 Director of Public Works 13,638 78.68 14,320 83 15,036 87 15,788 91 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1143 9410 Director of Public Works / City
Engineer 13,638 78.68 14,320 82.62 15,036 86.75 15,788 91.08 16,577 95.64 Mgmt 1144 9410

Page 2 of 6 ends
Page 85 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code
Downtown Operations Assistant 4,107 23.69 4,312 24.88 4,528 26.12 4,754 27.43 4,992 28.80 5,242 30.24 5,373 31.00 LMCEA 1147 9410 9 Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 6,999 40.38 7,349 42.40 7,716 44.52 8,102 46.74 8,507 49.08 8,932 51.53 9,155 52.82 LMCEA 1184 9410 62 Engineering Aide 4,524 26.10 4,750 27.40 4,988 28.78 5,237 30.21 5,499 31.73 5,774 33.31 5,918 34.14 LMCEA 1150 9410 19 Engineering Project Manager 9,864 56.91 10,357 59.75 10,875 62.74 11,419 65.88 11,990 69.17 Mgmt 1153 9410 Engineering Technician I 5,106 29.46 5,361 30.93 5,629 32.48 5,910 34.10 6,206 35.80 6,516 37.59 6,679 38.53 LMCEA 1156 9410 29 Engineering Technician II 5,612 32.38 5,893 34.00 6,188 35.70 6,497 37.48 6,822 39.36 7,163 41.33 7,342 42.36 LMCEA 1159 9410 40 Environmental Manager 9,430 54.40 11,463 66.13 Mgmt 1158 9420 Environmental Program Manager 7,754 44.73 8,142 46.97 8,549 49.32 8,976 51.78 9,425 54.38 9,896 57.09 10,143 58.52 LMCEA 1160 9420 58 Environmental Specialist 6,143 35.44 6,450 37.21 6,773 39.08 7,112 41.03 7,468 43.08 7,841 45.24 8,037 46.37 LMCEA 1355 9420 50 Equipment Operator 4,756 27.44 4,994 28.81 5,244 30.25 5,506 31.77 5,781 33.35 6,070 35.02 6,222 35.90 LMCEA 1162 9420 24 Equipment Service Worker 3,730 21.52 3,917 22.60 4,113 23.73 4,319 24.92 4,535 26.16 4,762 27.47 4,881 28.16 LMCEA 1165 9420 4 Executive Assistant to the City
Manager 6,092 35.15 6,397 36.91 6,717 38.75 7,053 40.69 7,406 42.73 7,776 44.86 7,970 45.98 Confidential 1339 8810 2 Executive Secretary to the Police
Chief 4,906 28.30 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,418 37.03 LMCEA 1023 8810 25 Facilities Manager 5,730 33.06 6,017 34.71 6,318 36.45 6,634 38.27 6,966 40.19 7,314 42.20 7,497 43.25 LMCEA 1168 9410 41 Facilities Specialist 4,906 28.30 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,418 37.03 LMCEA 1169 8810 25 Finance Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1172 8810 Fire Battalion Chief (112 hour) 9,987 41.16 10,486 43.21 11,010 45.37 11,561 47.64 12,139 50.02 Fire 1182 7706 7 Fire Battalion Chief (80 hour) 9,987 57.62 10,486 60.50 11,010 63.52 11,561 66.70 12,139 70.03 Fire 1176 7706 8 Fire Battalion Chief / Paramedic
(112 hour) 11,265 46.42 11,764 48.48 12,288 50.64 12,839 52.91 13,417 55.29 Fire 1194 7706 13 Fire Battalion Chief / Paramedic
(80 hour) 11,265 64.99 11,764 67.87 12,288 70.89 12,839 74.07 13,417 77.41 Fire 1193 7706 14 Fire Battalion Chief w/ PM Cert
(112 hour) 10,626 43.79 11,125 45.84 11,649 48.00 12,200 50.27 12,778 52.66 Fire 1181 7706 11 Fire Battalion Chief w/ PM Cert
(80 hour) 10,626 61.30 11,125 64.18 11,649 67.21 12,200 70.38 12,778 73.72 Fire 1179 7706 12 Fire Captain 8,088 33.33 8,492 34.99 8,917 36.75 9,363 38.58 9,831 40.51 Fire 1174 7706 5 Fire Captain / Paramedic 9,366 38.60 9,770 40.26 10,195 42.01 10,641 43.85 11,109 45.78 Fire 1175 7706 6 Fire Captain w/ PM Cert 8,727 35.96 9,131 37.63 9,556 39.38 10,002 41.22 10,470 43.15 Fire 1173 7706 10 Fire Chief 15,083 87.02 15,837 91 16,629 96 17,460 101 18,333 105.77 Mgmt 1177 7706 Fire Division Chief 11,393 65.73 11,963 69 12,561 72 13,189 76 13,848 79.89 Mgmt 1180 7706 Fire Engineer 7,110 29.30 7,466 30.77 7,839 32.30 8,231 33.92 8,643 35.62 Fire 1186 7706 2 Fire Engineer / Paramedic 8,388 34.57 8,744 36.03 9,117 37.57 9,509 39.19 9,921 40.88 Fire 1187 7706 4 Fire Engineer w/ PM Cert 7,749 31.93 8,105 33.40 8,478 34.94 8,870 36.55 9,282 38.25 Fire 1188 7706 9 Fire Inspector I 5,566 32.11 5,844 33.72 6,136 35.40 6,443 37.17 6,765 39.03 7,103 40.98 7,281 42.01 LMCEA 1052 9410 36 Fire Inspector II 6,123 35.33 6,429 37.09 6,750 38.94 7,088 40.89 7,442 42.93 7,814 45.08 8,009 46.21 LMCEA 1053 9410 49 Fire Marshal 11,456 66.09 12,029 69.40 12,630 72.87 13,262 76.51 13,925 80.34 Mgmt 1183 9410 Firefighter 5,928 24.43 6,224 25.65 6,535 26.93 6,862 28.28 7,205 29.69 Fire 1189 7706 1 Firefighter / Paramedic 7,011 28.89 7,362 30.34 7,730 31.85 8,117 33.45 8,523 35.12 Fire 1190 7706 3 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 6,116 35.28 6,422 37.05 6,743 38.90 7,080 40.85 7,434 42.89 7,806 45.03 8,001 46.16 LMCEA 1226 9420 47

Page 3 of 6 ends
Page 86 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code
General Service Worker 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Temporary 1192 9410 2 Heavy Equipment Operator 4,991 28.79 5,241 30.24 5,503 31.75 5,778 33.33 6,067 35.00 6,370 36.75 6,529 37.67 LMCEA 1195 9420 27 Homeless Outreach Technician 5,531 31.91 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,235 41.74 LMCEA 1196 9420 35 Human Resources Analyst 6,776 39.09 7,115 41.05 7,471 43.10 7,845 45.26 8,237 47.52 8,649 49.90 8,865 51.14 Confidential 1203 8810 3 Human Resources Assistant 3,975 22.93 4,174 24.08 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,201 30.01 Confidential 1205 8810 4 Human Resources Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1201 8810 Human Resources Technician 5,271 30.41 5,535 31.93 5,812 33.53 6,103 35.21 6,408 36.97 6,728 38.82 6,896 39.78 Confidential 1202 8810 1 Human Resources/Risk Manager 10,740 61.96 11,277 65.06 11,841 68.31 12,433 71.73 13,055 75.32 Mgmt 1200 8810 Human Services Manager 6,999 40.38 7,349 42.40 7,716 44.52 8,102 46.74 8,507 49.08 8,932 51.53 9,155 52.82 LMCEA 1204 9410 55 Information Technology Analyst 6,961 40.16 7,309 42.17 7,674 44.27 8,058 46.49 8,461 48.81 8,884 51.25 9,106 52.53 LMCEA 1208 9410 54 Information Technology Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1207 9410 Information Technology Specialist I 5,805 33.49 6,095 35.16 6,400 36.92 6,720 38.77 7,056 40.71 7,409 42.74 7,594 43.81 LMCEA 1210 9410 44 InformationTechnology Specialist II 6,384 36.83 6,703 38.67 7,038 40.60 7,390 42.63 7,760 44.77 8,148 47.01 8,352 48.18 LMCEA 1213 9410 52 Intern/Student Worker I 16.00 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 Temporary 1216 9410 3 Intern/Student Worker II 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 20.42 Temporary 1219 9410 7 Irrigation Technician 4,536 26.17 4,763 27.48 5,001 28.85 5,251 30.29 5,514 31.81 5,790 33.40 5,935 34.24 LMCEA 1222 9420 20 Juvenile Services Officer 23.81 25.00 26.25 27.56 28.94 Temporary 1118 9410 28 Lead Lifeguard 17.94 18.84 19.78 20.77 21.81 Temporary 1230 9410 25 Lead Mechanic 5,764 33.25 6,052 34.92 6,355 36.66 6,673 38.50 7,007 40.43 7,357 42.44 7,541 43.51 LMCEA 1225 9420 43 Lifeguard Aide 16.00 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 Temporary 1227 9410 5 Lifeguard/Instructor 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 20.42 Temporary 1228 9410 9 Live Scan Operator 16.00 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 Temporary 1229 8810 6 Management Analyst 6,943 40.06 7,290 42.06 7,655 44.16 8,038 46.37 8,440 48.69 Mgmt 1231 8810 Mayor Salary Established by Ordinance - rev 12/06 2,000 11.54 Elected 1234 9410 3 Mechanic I 4,700 27.12 4,935 28.47 5,182 29.90 5,441 31.39 5,713 32.96 5,999 34.61 6,149 35.48 LMCEA 1237 9420 22 Mechanic II 5,169 29.82 5,427 31.31 5,698 32.87 5,983 34.52 6,282 36.24 6,596 38.05 6,761 39.01 LMCEA 1240 9420 30 Park Maintenance Lead Worker 5,228 30.16 5,489 31.67 5,763 33.25 6,051 34.91 6,354 36.66 6,672 38.49 6,839 39.46 LMCEA 1243 9420 32 Park Maintenance Supervisor 6,116 35.28 6,422 37.05 6,743 38.90 7,080 40.85 7,434 42.89 7,806 45.03 8,001 46.16 LMCEA 1246 9420 47 Park Maintenance Worker I 3,730 21.52 3,917 22.60 4,113 23.73 4,319 24.92 4,535 26.16 4,762 27.47 4,881 28.16 LMCEA 1249 9420 4 Park Maintenance Worker II 4,126 23.80 4,332 24.99 4,549 26.24 4,776 27.55 5,015 28.93 5,266 30.38 5,398 31.14 LMCEA 1252 9420 10 Park Maintenance Worker III 4,536 26.17 4,763 27.48 5,001 28.85 5,251 30.29 5,514 31.81 5,790 33.40 5,935 34.24 LMCEA 1255 9420 20 Permit Technician 4,044 23.33 4,246 24.50 4,458 25.72 4,681 27.01 4,915 28.36 5,161 29.78 5,290 30.52 LMCEA 1258 8810 8 Planning Technician 4,968 28.66 5,216 30.09 5,477 31.60 5,751 33.18 6,039 34.84 6,341 36.58 6,500 37.50 LMCEA 1261 9410 57 Police Assistant 4,180 24.12 4,389 25.32 4,608 26.58 4,838 27.91 5,080 29.31 5,334 30.77 5,467 31.54 LMCEA 1264 8810 12 Police Captain 13,528 78.05 14,204 81.95 14,914 86.04 15,660 90.35 16,443 94.86 Mgmt 1267 7720 Police Chief 16,882 97.40 17,726 102 18,612 107 19,543 113 20,520 118.38 Mgmt 1270 7720

Page 4 of 6 ends
Page 87 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code
Police Dispatcher 5,276 30.44 5,540 31.96 5,817 33.56 6,108 35.24 6,413 37.00 6,573 37.92 Police N/S 1276 8810 5 Police Lieutenant 12,265 70.76 12,878 74.30 13,522 78.01 14,198 81.91 14,908 86.01 Mgmt 1279 7720 Police Officer 7,043 40.63 7,395 42.66 7,765 44.80 8,153 47.04 8,561 49.39 8,989 51.86 9,438 54.45 9,910 57.17 10,406 60.03 Police 1282 7720 1 Police Officer Trainee 7,043 40.63 7,395 42.66 7,765 44.80 8,153 47.04 8,561 49.39 8,989 51.86 9,438 54.45 9,910 57.17 10,406 60.03 Police 1283 7720 1 Police Property Officer I 4,335 25.01 4,552 26.26 4,780 27.58 5,019 28.96 5,270 30.40 5,402 31.17 Police N/S 1284 9410 7 Police Property Officer II 4,772 27.53 5,011 28.91 5,262 30.36 5,525 31.88 5,801 33.47 5,946 34.30 Police N/S 1285 9410 3 Police Sergeant 9,071 52.33 9,525 54.95 10,001 57.70 10,501 60.58 11,026 63.61 11,577 66.79 12,156 70.13 12,764 73.64 13,402 77.32 Police 1288 7720 2 Police Services Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1290 9410 Police Services Specialist 4,831 27.87 5,073 29.27 5,327 30.73 5,593 32.27 5,873 33.88 6,020 34.73 Police N/S 1293 8810 4 Police Services Technician 4,466 25.77 4,689 27.05 4,923 28.40 5,169 29.82 5,427 31.31 5,563 32.09 Police N/S 1291 8810 1 Public Works Crew Leader 5,764 33.25 6,052 34.92 6,355 36.66 6,673 38.50 7,007 40.43 7,357 42.44 7,541 43.51 LMCEA 1301 9420 60 Public Works Inspector I 5,581 32.20 5,860 33.81 6,153 35.50 6,461 37.28 6,784 39.14 7,123 41.09 7,301 42.12 LMCEA 1294 9420 37 Public Works Inspector II 6,146 35.46 6,453 37.23 6,776 39.09 7,115 41.05 7,471 43.10 7,845 45.26 8,041 46.39 LMCEA 1297 9420 51 Public Works Maint Lead Worker 5,228 30.16 5,489 31.67 5,763 33.25 6,051 34.91 6,354 36.66 6,672 38.49 6,839 39.46 LMCEA 1300 9420 32 Public Works Maintenance Supervisor 6,116 35.28 6,422 37.05 6,743 38.90 7,080 40.85 7,434 42.89 7,806 45.03 8,001 46.16 LMCEA 1303 9420 47 Public Works Maintenance Worker I 3,730 21.52 3,917 22.60 4,113 23.73 4,319 24.92 4,535 26.16 4,762 27.47 4,881 28.16 LMCEA 1306 9420 4 Public Works Maintenance Worker II 4,126 23.80 4,332 24.99 4,549 26.24 4,776 27.55 5,015 28.93 5,266 30.38 5,398 31.14 LMCEA 1309 9420 10 Public Works Maintenance Worker III 4,536 26.17 4,763 27.48 5,001 28.85 5,251 30.29 5,514 31.81 5,790 33.40 5,935 34.24 LMCEA 1312 9420 20 Public Works Operations Manager 7,986 46.07 8,385 48.38 8,804 50.79 9,244 53.33 9,706 56.00 Mgmt 1314 9420 Purchasing Officer 7,986 46.07 8,385 48.38 8,804 50.79 9,244 53.33 9,706 56.00 Mgmt 1315 8810 Records & Elections Manager 8,655 49.93 9,088 52.43 9,542 55.05 10,019 57.80 10,520 60.69 Mgmt 1318 8810 Records Technician 4,446 25.77 4,689 27.05 4,923 28.40 5,169 29.82 5,427 31.31 5,563 32.09 LMCEA 1317 8810 Recreation Aide 16.00 16.80 17.64 18.52 19.45 Temporary 1321 9410 1 Recreation Leader 17.09 17.94 18.84 19.78 20.77 Temporary 1324 9410 4 Recreation Specialist 17.94 18.84 19.78 20.77 21.81 Temporary 1327 9410 8 Recreation Supervisor 5,739 33.11 6,026 34.77 6,327 36.50 6,643 38.33 6,975 40.24 7,324 42.25 7,507 43.31 LMCEA 1330 9410 42 Risk Manager 9,760 56.31 10,248 59.12 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 11,863 68.44 Mgmt 1333 9410 38 Safety Volunteer Coordinator 5,591 32.26 5,871 33.87 6,165 35.57 6,473 37.34 6,797 39.21 7,137 41.18 7,315 42.20 LMCEA 1336 9410 Senior Accountant 7,986 46.07 8,385 48.38 8,804 50.79 9,244 53.33 9,706 56.00 Mgmt 1342 8810 63 Senior Accounting Technician 5,770 33.29 6,059 34.96 6,362 36.70 6,680 38.54 7,014 40.47 7,365 42.49 7,549 43.55 LMCEA 1014 9420 53 Senior Building Inspector 6,738 38.87 7,075 40.82 7,429 42.86 7,800 45.00 8,190 47.25 8,600 49.62 8,815 50.86 LMCEA 1345 9410 Senior Management Analyst 7,986 46.07 8,385 48.38 8,804 50.79 9,244 53.33 9,706 56.00 Mgmt 1348 8810 Senior Planner 9,512 54.88 9,988 57.62 10,487 60.50 11,011 63.53 11,562 66.70 Mgmt 1351 9410 26 Senior Tree Trimmer 4,968 28.66 5,216 30.09 5,477 31.60 5,751 33.18 6,039 34.84 6,341 36.58 6,500 37.50 LMCEA 1354 9420 58 Stormwater Program Manager 7,754 44.73 8,142 46.97 8,549 49.32 8,976 51.78 9,425 54.38 9,896 57.09 10,143 58.52 LMCEA 1356 9420 Superintendent of Public Works 8,932 51.53 9,379 54.11 9,848 56.82 10,340 59.65 10,857 62.64 Mgmt 1357 9420 59

Page 5 of 6 ends
Page 88 of 522 ends

C
Step A
(Minimum)
Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Month Hour Step B Step C Step D Step E (Maximum) Step F Step G Step H Step I Class Title Range
# Payroll Group Class
Code
WC
Code
Transportation Specialist 4,357 25.14 4,575 26.39 4,804 27.72 5,044 29.10 5,296 30.55 5,561 32.08 5,700 32.88 LMCEA 1328 8810 18 Tree Trimmer 4,514 26.04 4,740 27.35 4,977 28.71 5,226 30.15 5,487 31.66 5,761 33.24 5,905 34.07 LMCEA 1360 9420 4 Wastewater Maintenance Worker I 3,730 21.52 3,917 22.60 4,113 23.73 4,319 24.92 4,535 26.16 4,762 27.47 4,881 28.16 LMCEA 1307 9420 10 Wastewater Maintenance Worker II 4,126 23.80 4,332 24.99 4,549 26.24 4,776 27.55 5,015 28.93 5,266 30.38 5,398 31.14 LMCEA 1310 9420 20 Wastewater Maintenance Worker III 4,536 26.17 4,763 27.48 5,001 28.85 5,251 30.29 5,514 31.81 5,790 33.40 5,935 34.24 LMCEA 1313 9420 For additional Temporary employees
hired into Regular classifications, use
data associated with the Regular
classification, but use "2" instead of
"1" as the first digit of the Class Code.

Page 6 of 6 ends
Page 89 of 522 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 14, 2023
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GRANT

APPLICATION FOR THE REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON
THE HOMELESS FISCAL YEAR 2023 SUPER NOTICE
OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY; ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS IF AWARDED; AND

APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE,

TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY

AMENDMENTS
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager’s Office
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a grant application for the Regional Task Force on the Homeless Fiscal Year 2023 Super Notice of Funding Opportunity; accepting and appropriating funds if awarded; and appointing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments? Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a grant application for the Regional Task Force on the Homeless Fiscal Year 2023 Super Notice of Funding Opportunity; accepting and appropriating funds if awarded; and appointing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments.

Fiscal Impact:

The grant does not require a General Fund match. Funds in the amount of $1,231,570 have been requested to fund two new HOME Team positions (one clinical social worker and one outreach worker), rental assistance costs, and supportive services. If awarded, the funds will be appropriated to various General Fund and Non-General Fund accounts.

Page 90 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 2 of 3
Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Task Force on Homelessness (RTFH) is a 501(c)3 non-profit and is the designated lead of the San Diego City and County Continuum of Care (CoC), as designated by The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The RTFH is the administrative entity of the State of California funds and the direct recipient of other local, state, and philanthropic funding that has been identified to address homelessness in the San Diego Region. On October 2, 2023 the RTFH released a Super Notice of Funding Opportunity (“Super NOFO”), which includes multiple sources of funding. The Super NOFO’s was released to agencies who are interested in providing critical programs that align with the RTFH Regional Plan; focusing on access and movement toward housing for people experiencing homelessness.

DISCUSSION:

On October 31, 2023, staff applied for the Super NOFO in the amount of $1,231,570. All funds awarded from the grant must be fully expended by December 2025. The City requested funds to cover the cost of two additional HOME Team members until December 2025, at which time the City will continue to fund the costs as was approved by the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 Operating Budget. Additionally, the City requested funds to cover the costs of landlord engagement incentives, unit deposits, and rental assistance for occupants. If the program proves successful, the City will review City available funding and continue the program.

As homelessness is not an isolated issue, the City of La Mesa has been and plans to continue coordinating with its East County partners the Cities of El Cajon, Lemon Grove and Santee and the County of San Diego. If these funds are awarded, La Mesa anticipates that the use of resources will benefit the East County region.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a grant application for the Regional Task Force on the Homeless Fiscal Year 2023 Super Notice of Funding

Page 91 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 3 of 3
Opportunity; accepting and appropriating funds if awarded; and appointing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Amanda Lee
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Attachments: Resolution

Page 92 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS FISCAL YEAR 2023 SUPER NOTICE OF
FUNDING OPPORTUNITY; ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IF AWARDED; AND APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE TO

EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the Regional Task Force on Homelessness (RTFH) is a 501(c)3 non-profit and is the designated lead of the San Diego City and County Continuum of Care (CoC), as designated by The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); WHEREAS, the RTFH is the administrative entity of the State of California funds and the direct recipient of other local, state, and philanthropic funding that has been identified to address homelessness in the San Diego Region;
WHEREAS, On October 2, 2023 the RTFH released a Super Notice of Funding Opportunity (“Super NOFO”), which includes multiple sources of funding; and WHEREAS, City Council of the City of La Mesa desires to submit an application for the RTFH Super NOFO for approval of grant funding for programs that assist persons experiencing homelessness.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California:

1. Approves an application for the RTFH Super NOFA;

2. Accepts and appropriate funds for the RTFH Super NOFA, if awarded; and

3. Appoints the City Manager, or a designee, as agent of the City Council of the City of La Mesa to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 93 of 522 ends

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 94 of 522 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 14, 2023
SUBJECT: PROJECT 2023-2346 (MACDOUGALL) -

CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO DESIGNATE
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE,
APN 494-120-34-00 AND 494-130-16-00 AS A

HISTORIC LANDMARK AND ESTABLISH A

PROPERTY PRESERVATION (MILLS ACT)

AGREEMENT FOR THE SITE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issue:

Does the property at 4987 Colina Drive qualify for designation as a historic landmark, and should the City enter into a property preservation (Mills Act) agreement with the owner?
Recommendation:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to 1) designate the property known as the Charlotte and John E. King House located at 4987 Colina Drive as a historic landmark (Attachment A) and 2) enter into a Mills Act Property Preservation Agreement with the property owner (Attachment B).

Fiscal Impact:

The amount of property tax to the City would be reduced by approximately $900 annually. In exchange for discounted property taxes, the City receives guaranteed property maintenance and improvements to ensure the ongoing preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration as stipulated in a property preservation agreement. Well maintained historic landmarks can increase property values in the neighborhood.

Page 95 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 2 of 6
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
 Ensure safe and affordable homes for La Mesa's current and future residents
Environmental Review:

This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331.

BACKGROUND:

The Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan provides a framework for the City’s Historic Preservation program, of which a Register of Historic Landmarks is a key component. Chapter 25.03 of the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance provides for the designation of historic landmarks by the City Council. A cultural resource may be designated a historic landmark if it meets one or more of eight criteria listed below.

A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship;
D. It is representative of the notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect;
E. It is identified with a person or groups who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City;
F. It embodies elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail materials, or craftsmanship;
G. It is an archeological or paleontological site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value; or
H. It is a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of sites, buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement.

Page 96 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 3 of 6
Alterations to historic landmarks are subject to development approval by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to ensure that cultural resources are being maintained in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

Properties with landmark designation are eligible for a reduced property tax assessment through the Mills Act, and the owners have applied for this benefit in conjunction with the landmark nomination. California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into property preservation agreements with owners of qualified historical properties to ensure the preservation, maintenance and restoration of historic properties through reduced property tax assessments. The preservation agreement has an initial 10-year term that automatically extends by one additional year on each anniversary of the effective date, unless either party files a notice of non-renewal.

The owner of 4987 Colina Drive has nominated the property to the local historic landmark registry. On October 3, 2023, the HPC conducted a public hearing and voted 4-0 to adopt resolutions (Attachments C and D) recommending that the City Council approve historical landmark designation and enter into a Mills Act Preservation Agreement with the owner.

DISCUSSION:

Located on the south side of Colina Drive east of Maiden Lane, the site sits near the top of a knoll overlooking the Downtown Village to the south. The property is listed as the Charlotte King House in the Historic Resources Inventory (Attachment E). A vicinity map is shown below, and the Assessor Parcel
map is provided as Attachment F.

As described in the nomination report
(Attachment G), the Charlotte King house was
constructed on a portion of Lot 69 of La Mesa
Colony in 1922, when developers Annie
Temple and Jane Judson embarked on a
project to build a group of small bungalows
called the “Colina Cottages” on this land. They
graded a road into the hillside and established
a footpath with steps from Orchard Avenue,
which remains today as a public stairway.

Ultimately only two of the cottages were built.

In 1928, the area was subdivided into “Colina
Del Sol,” nicknamed the little hill in the
sunshine.

Page 97 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 4 of 6
The first residents of the property, Charlotte and John E. King, were community leaders active in local clubs and organizations. Mr. King was in the insurance and real estate business and actively promoted the many advantages of La Mesa’s ideal geography and climate. After his death in 1924, Mrs. King continued to live at the residence until 1956.

The property description in the nomination report notes the Craftsman Bungalow characteristics present on both the house and garage. Both structures are clad in wood shingles with gable and cross-gable roofs, with wide overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails. The original windows are varied, single and double sash and at the front, vertical paned with small vertical panes at the top. Alterations to the house include construction of the back porch sometime between 1929 and 1949, enclosure of the front porch, replacement of some of the original windows with vinyl fixtures, and new wood shingle siding.

Overall the resource retains a good level of architectural integrity of location, setting, workmanship, and feeling, with a fair degree of design and materials from its 1922-1949 period of significance, and exhibits character-defining features of the Craftsman Bungalow style. For this reason, the HPC concluded the property is eligible for landmark designation under Criterion A as a special element of Colina Del Sol’s architectural and landscaping development, and Criterion C, for embodying distinctive characteristics of the Craftsman Bungalow style of architecture. With the landmark designation, the proposed historic name of the resource would be the Charlotte and John E. King House in recognition of both of the original owners.

Mills Act Agreement
While the site and improvements are in excellent condition, the owners have identified a number of planned rehabilitation projects. Those improvements would be funded with the Mills Act tax savings and are therefore proposed for inclusion in the Mills Act agreement. The owners’ proposed timeline is as follows:

Page 98 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 5 of 6
 Replace all vinyl windows in house and garage with wood frame windows to match originals (by 2033)
 Repair dry rot on eaves and fascia of house and garage (by 2033)  Repair redwood shingle siding on the garage (by 2033)  Repair foundation cracks in garage (by 2033)
 Replace garage roof (by 2033)
Public Notice of Project
Notification of the November 14, 2023, public hearing to consider the historic landmark application and preservation agreement was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on November 2, 2023, and published in the Daily Transcript on November 3, 2023. No comments have been received.

Environmental Review:

The historic landmark nomination request is exempt from environmental review pursuant to categorical exemption Class 1, Existing Facilities and categorical exemption Class 31, Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation, as provided by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331, respectively.

Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility. Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. None of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 apply.

CONCLUSION:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the draft resolutions provided as Attachments A and B to designate the property known as the Charlotte and John E. King House located at 4987 Colina Drive as a historic landmark and execute a Mills Act Preservation Agreement.

Page 99 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 6 of 6
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:

Lynnette Santos
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments:

A. Draft Council Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation B. Draft Council Resolution for Mills Act Agreement
C. Resolution HPC 2023-07 Recommending Landmark Designation D. Resolution HPC 2023-08 Recommending a Mills Act Agreement E. Historic Resources Inventory Worksheet
F. Assessor Parcel Map Sheet
G. Historic Landmark Nomination Report

Page 100 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
DESIGNATING THE CHARLOTTE AND JOHN E. KING HOUSE AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE, APN 494-120-34-00 AND 494-130-16-00 AS A HISTORIC

LANDMARK
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Robert MacDougall, owner of the property located at 4987 Colina Drive, APN 494-120-34-00 and 494-130-16-00 in the R1 (Urban Residential) zone, has submitted a request to designate the property as a local historic landmark of the City of La Mesa; WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of La Mesa held a duly noticed public hearing on October 3, 2023, and accepted public testimony in considering the request;
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission did adopt Resolution HPC 2023-07 on October 3, 2023, recommending to the City Council designation of the Charlotte and John E. King House, located at 4987 Colina Drive, as a Historic Landmark; WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered a staff report on the Historic Preservation Commission’s determination; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 2023, and accepted public testimony in considering Project 2023-2346, a request to designate the Charlotte and John E. King House at 4987 Colina Drive as a historic landmark in the City of La Mesa.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility.

Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. The project meets the criteria for the exemptions and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. Project 2023-2346 complies with Section 25.03.010 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Historic Landmark and Historic District Designation Criteria, finding that Criteria A and C of the Section apply to the historical and cultural significance of the property.

Page 101 of 522 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The City Council designates the Charlotte and John E. King House, located at 4987 Colina Drive and further described in “Exhibit A”, attached thereto and made a part thereof, as a Historic Landmark.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14
th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 102 of 522 ends

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1:

LOT 11 OF COLINA DEL SOL, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2094, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 10, 1928.

EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOT 11 THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11 WHICH IS DISTANT THEREON EAST 22.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 10.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61° 25' WEST 34.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85° 36' WEST, 43.45 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF MAIDEN LANE, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 2094.

PARCEL 2:

THAT PORTION OP LOT 69 OF LA MESA COLONY, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 346, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 8, 1887, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COLINA DEL SOL, AS SHOWN ON MAP THEREOF NO. 2094, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 10, 1928, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID COLINA DEL SOL, 253.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 201.68 FEET. A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARING NORTH 14° 22' WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE

25.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 258.46 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 69; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

APN 494-120-34-00; 494-130-16-00

Page 103 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY

PRESERVATION AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNER OF THE HISTORIC
LANDMARK KNOWN AS THE CHARLOTTE AND JOHN E. KING HOUSE
LOCATED AT 4987 COLINA DRIVE, APN 494-120-34-00 AND 494-130-16-00 ________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Robert MacDougall, owner of the property located at 4987 Colina Drive Hillcrest Avenue, 494-120-34-00 and 494-130-16-00 in the R1 (Urban Residential) zone, wishes to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of their historic property by entering into an Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement authorized under the Mills Act with the City;
WHEREAS, properties listed on the City of La Mesa Historic Landmarks Registry are eligible, by Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement, for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, also known as the Mills Act;
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, the City Council of the City of La Mesa adopted Resolution No. 2023-XX designating the Charlotte and John E. King House located at 4987 Colina Drive as a historic landmark; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 2023, considered a staff report, and accepted public testimony in considering the request for a Historic Landmark Property Preservation agreement.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility.

Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. The project meets the criteria for the exemptions and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. That the project complies with California Government Code Sections 50280 et seq. as set forth in the Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

Page 104 of 522 ends

2. The Mayor is hereby authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City that certain Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement with Robert MacDougall, owner of the Historic Landmark known as the Charlotte and John E.

King House at 4987 Colina Drive, to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, subject to the following improvement schedule that shall be placed in a timeline as an attachment to the agreement:
a. Replace all vinyl windows in house and garage with wood frame windows to match originals (by 2033)
b. Repair dry rot on eaves and fascia of house and garage (by 2033) c. Repair redwood shingle siding on the garage (by 2033) d. Repair foundation cracks in garage (by 2033)
e. Replace roof of garage (by 2033)
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 105 of 522 ends
Page 106 of 522 ends
Page 107 of 522 ends
Page 108 of 522 ends
Page 109 of 522 ends
Page 110 of 522 ends
Page 111 of 522 ends
Page 112 of 522 ends
Page 113 of 522 ends
Page 114 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination
September 2023 Charlotte and John E. King House
Prepared for: Robert MacDougall, Property Owner, 4987 Colina Dr. La Mesa, CA 91942 Submitted to: City of La Mesa, Community Development Department / Planning Division, Historic Preservation Commission, 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California 91942
Prepared by: Document prepared by Robert MacDougall with supporting documentation and images.

Property description and significance conclusions were prepared by Ginger Weatherford, MPS, who meets 36 CFR Part 61 of the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History.

Original research provided by Jim Newland.

Page 115 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM........................................................................................ 3 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................... 7 East Elevation (Main Façade) ........................................................................................................................................7 North Elevation .................................................................................................................................................................8 West Elevation (Rear Façade) ......................................................................................................................................8 South Elevation .................................................................................................................................................................9 III. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE...................................................................................................... 11 La Mesa Colony and “Colina Del Sol”.......................................................................................................................11 Property History.............................................................................................................................................................12 Craftsman Bungalow Residential Architecture..........................................................................................................16 Significance Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................16 IV. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................. 18 V. WORKS CITED/ENDNOTES ............................................................................................................... 100

Page 116 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 3
I. HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM

Page 117 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 4

Page 118 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 5

Page 119 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 6

Page 120 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 7
II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Constructed around 1922, the subject property at 4987 Colina Drive was designed in the Craftsman Bungalow Style. The property includes two historic-era buildings: the main dwelling and a garage constructed in the same style, as described in the historic resources inventory (Figure 1). Both buildings are clad in wood shingles with gable and cross-gable roofs, covered in composition shingles, with wide overhanging eaves and exposed rafters.

The Charlotte King house was constructed around 1922 (Figure 2, Figure 3) on Lot 69 of the La Mesa Colony (Figure 5) which was subdivided in 1925 by a partnership that included the original owners (Ms.

Temple, Ms. Judson), and the first residents (Ms. Charlotte King and Mr. John E. King) to rename this part of the hill “Colina Del Sol” (Figure 6). The main dwelling is in the center of the lot with the garage set 50' away to the north-east near Colina Drive. The house is nestled within the center of La Mesa, bearing witness to the city's historical development.

The property contains several unique historic features including a gate on the south border of the property leading to a footpath to Orchard Avenue with easy access to downtown La Mesa, a vision of the original developers of Lot 69 and this hill in La Mesa (Figure 87-89).

Constructed around 1922, the main dwelling is sited near the center of the lot, built in the Craftsman Bungalow style. This style was popular in the early 20th century and is characterized by its practical layout, wide front porches, and handcrafted details, all of which are exemplified by this property.

The original windows are varied, single and double sash and at the front, vertical paned with small vertical panes at the top. Over the front entrance there is a small roof and pediment. The house stands on a large piece of ground with many mixed trees including eucalyptus, pine, pistachio, apple, lemon, and fig trees.

The property retains a good level of architectural integrity of location, setting, workmanship, and feeling, with a fair level of integrity of design and materials from its 1922-1949 period of significance, and exhibits character-defining features of the Craftsman Bungalow style.

East Elevation (Main Façade)
The east elevation is the main façade of the dwelling, facing the landscaping and the neighboring properties at 5001 and 5051 Colina Drive. The front door is accessed by entering through the driveway on Colina Drive and walking behind the garage and by taking the concrete steps up to the property from Orchard Avenue. A paver stone walkway winds from the asphalt of the garage and parking area and ends in a curved design to meet the natural stone patio area near the front door. A wooden bench is present at the edge of the curve across from the front door. A grilling area, dining table, and fountain are also present south of the bench. The entry door is a set of wood French doors flanked by matching sidelights and two sets of multi-light casement windows. These doors, sidelights and casement windows do not appear original to the circa 1922 construction campaign. They may have been installed in the 1990s.

Wide wood moulding frames the front door, sidelights, and casement windows. Craftsman style sconces flank the sidelights within the moulding. The entrance area is covered by a shed roof with a gable peak

Page 121 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 8
behind. The south section of this façade features a Chicago-style window arrangement; a large fixed window in the center with four vertical lights over one large light, flanked by multi-light casement windows.

The north section of this façade features two sets of original large casement windows, each with two sets of casements. The south two sets contain two smaller lights over two larger lights, while the north two sets contain one smaller light over one larger light. This façade may have been altered over the years. The 1982 Department of Parks and Recreation form (Figure 1) describes the front entrance as containing “a small roof and pediment.” The photograph on the form was taken from the north, looking south without a view of the front entrance. Sanborn Maps from 1929 and 1949 (Figure 49, Figure 50) indicate the façade is asymmetrical with the northern portion being larger than the southern portion with a set-back between the two portions. The Residential Building Record site plan (Figure 4) illustrates the façade in its current configuration of straight across with a 7’ x 18’ set-back within. The letters “C”, “E”, “A” and “P” in this area likely mean Concrete or Covered, Enclosed, Area, Porch. It is not clear if the current facade filled in the entrance area with the French doors, sidelights, and casement windows. The Residential Building Record contains a 10’ x 12’ patio on the north corner which is not present today.

North Elevation
The north elevation of the dwelling faces the side yard, which is covered in red brick and enclosed by a vertical wood fence, a pergola, a sauna, the parking area, which is covered in asphalt, the garage, and Colina Drive. This façade features a side gable roof with wide overhanging eaves and decorative beams on each corner. East of the gable peak is a set of wood French doors with a concrete stoop lined in red brick. A decorative wood channel surrounds the electrical panel with horizontal boards from the ground to the gable peak framed with long vertical wood moulding on each side. Near the west corner is a oneover-one vinyl window with framed with wood moulding. Three Craftsman style sconces are present along this portion of the façade. The west 10’-7” of the façade is part of the 2009 addition. A set of vinyl multi-light casement windows, framed in wood moulding, is present in the east corner. Below the windows is a wood cabinet with a marble top. A tall wood cabinet sits next to the set of windows.

West Elevation (Rear Façade)
The west elevation, which is the rear façade of the dwelling, faces the rear yard, which is covered in red brick and gravel, and the neighboring property at 4981 Colina Drive. A small three-light vinyl window is present in the 11’-7” section of the original façade. The 30’ projection from the principal mass is part of the 2009 addition. Originally, a 4’ x 8’ projection from the principal mass was present near the center of the façade. The rear-facing gable addition contains wide overhanging eaves with decorative beams on each corner and in the peak. Three small three-light vinyl windows are present below the gable end. The south 16’ of this façade is part of the historic portion of the dwelling. A 6’ x 8’ concrete covered porch is present in the south corner. One concrete step leads up to the concrete stoop. A narrow square wood column supports the porch roof on the southwest corner of the concrete stoop. According to the Sanborn Maps, this porch was added at an unknown date between 1929 and 1949 (Figure 49, Figure 50). The north corner contains a multi-light wood entrance door covered with a wood framed screen door. A Craftsman style sconce is present to the right of the door. Continuing the concrete step to the south is a composite deck and step. The deck continues around the corner to the south elevation. Near the south corner is a set of four-light wood casement windows. All windows and doors are framed in wide wood moulding.

Page 122 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 9
South Elevation
The south elevation of the dwelling faces the south side yard, a thoughtfully designed terraced landscape; with pathways, trees and bushes; and the neighboring properties below at 8270 and 8276-8288 Orchard Avenue. The west 10’-7” of the façade is part of the 2009 addition. A narrow vertical piece of siding demarcates the original dwelling from the addition. Near the west corner is a set of vinyl multi-light casement windows. A set of wood multi-light casement windows is present near the east corner, within the concrete covered porch. The side-facing gable end contains decorative wood beams on each corner with an exterior red brick chimney within the peak continuing through the eave. A decorative band of brick lines the top of the chimney along with a metal spark arrestor. The base of the chimney is wider than the shaft with stepped bricks on either side transitioning from the wider portion to the narrower portion. The chimney serves an original Batchelder fireplace with original mantel and built in shelving on the interior (Figure 91). Flanking the chimney are three-over-one wood windows. Craftsman style sconces are present between the east and west corners and the windows. All windows are framed with wide wood moulding.

A tree is outlined within the south edge of the composite decking. A wood pergola covers the deck, which continues to the east corner.

Garage
The garage is the only building on the property viewable from Colina Drive. Redwood shingles cover the façades of the front-facing gable building. The roof is clad in composition shingles and contains wide overhanging eaves with exposed rafters. The two-car garage door on the north façade is a horizontal wood pull-up door. A red brick wall on the east property line sits very near the east façade of the garage. The east façade is void of fenestration. Near the east corner of the south façade is a wood paneled door. A vinyl horizontal sliding window is present under the peak of the gable roof. Fenestration are framed with wood moulding. The west façade is void of fenestration and contains a wood and corrugated metal fence enclosing the trash cans. Metal braces connect the fence posts to the west façade.

A large Eucalyptus tree sits near the northwest corner of the garage. This tree was trimmed recently due to high winds breaking the large limbs causing them to fall. The driveway is clad in concrete and asphalt.

The asphalt continues beyond the driveway to the garage and parking area, which has room for three cars. Previous owners operated a pottery store out of the garage. The street facing portion of the property is landscaped with a variety of trees and bushes.

Exterior alterations to the property since 1922 include: construction of the garage in 1931; construction of the back porch at an unknown date between 1929 and 1949 (may have been constructed in 1931 along with the garage, the 1929 Sanborn map does not depict a back porch, the 1949 Sanborn map depicts the back porch); enclosure of the front porch by adding a set of French doors flanked by multi-light sidelights and two sets of multi-light casement windows covered by a shed roof at an unknown date between 1949 and 1982 (the 1949 Sanborn map does not depict a porch on the front façade, the appraiser notes on the Residential Building Record between 1961 and 1974 include the letters “C”, “E”, “A” and “P” in the entry area which likely mean Concrete or Covered, Enclosed, Area, Porch, the 1982 Department of Parks and Recreation forms describe a small roof and pediment over the front entrance, the pediment is most likely the front-facing gable peak roof behind the shed roof); a decorative wood channel was added around the electrical panel and an original wood window was replaced with a oneover-one vinyl window in the original opening and retaining the wood moulding, on the north façade (these alterations may have occurred during the 2009 addition); in 2009 an addition was constructed on the west side of the dwelling replacing the 4’ x 8’ projection from the principal mass near the center of the façade, the original windows on this façade were replaced with vinyl windows within the original opening

Page 123 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 10
retaining the wood moulding; the wood shingle siding appears to have been covered with new wood shingle siding during the 2009 addition, the original wood shingles may be under the new wood shingles or the original wood shingles were replaced in kind to match the wood shingles on the addition; a Trex composite deck was added to the south façade which continues around to the west façade to meet up with the back concrete covered porch and step; a vinyl horizontal sliding window was added on the south façade of the garage and a wood and corrugated metal fence enclosing the trash cans with metal braces connecting the fence posts to the garage wall was added to the west façade of the garage at an unknown date, possibly during the 2009 addition.

Page 124 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 11
III. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
La Mesa Colony and “Colina Del Sol”
The property was built in Lot 69 of the La Mesa Colony, adjacent to the historic Orchard Track, which was subdivided in 1907 (Figure 5). The La Mesa colony had separate ownership.

In 1922, two ladies, Ms. Annie Temple and Ms. Jane Judson, buy the west half of Lot 69. Previous to 1922, ownership likely changed between speculators and investors (e.g. the name “Webster” comes up in early records). In 1922, ownership changes to Temple and Judson.

That year, 1922, they write an article in The La Mesa Scout (Figure 8) about plans to build a group of small bungalows known as the “Colina Cottages”, which was the first indication of their plans for the land.

The land was completely inaccessible so they start grading the road into their property at this time, which will also be accessible from Orchard via “an easy graded footpath with steps”, a remarkable feature of the property that remains today (Figure 87-89).

Only two bungalows were built, with Ms. Charlotte King and Mr. John E. King becoming the first residents of the first bungalow, the subject dwelling, and Ms. Temple occupying the second bungalow to the west of the current property.

In 1925, Miss Temple and Miss Judson are part of the partnership to create a new subdivision named “Colina del Sol” – the little hill in the sunshine (Figure 6, Figure 7), which was the nickname for that piece of the hill. On the second page of the subdivision map (Figure 6), we see the signatures of Annie Temple, Jane Judson, the Lights (who owned property in the subdivision – see the Light Tract in Figure 9) and Charlotte King, the first resident of the house with her husband, John E. King, with the name King written right onto the subdivision in lot eleven map (Figure 7). The current tax records of the property have two parcels (Lot 11 and Lot 69) reflecting the history of the Colina Del Sol subdivision.

Page 125 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 12
Property History
The periods 1922-1956 and 1978-2002 are the most relevant to the historical significance. 1922-1956
The main dwelling at 4987 Colina Dr. was constructed in 1922. From improvement records (Figure 2), there were no improvements on their property under the improvement column in 1922, but, in 1923, there are improvements on the property indicating the house was built in 1922. The “year built” date of 1922 is confirmed by the county building record (Figure 3).

There is a record of Annie Temple working with a local contractor in town, D.C. Marker (Figure 19) at this time. There is a possibility that Marker built the property, as he did later build the garage in 1931 (Figure 32) probably because he was familiar with the property.

Annie Temple and Jane Judson
Annie Temple was from Kentucky, born in 1865 (Figure 12). The first record of her in La Mesa is 1922 with an address of “Palm and Orchard”. Her business is listed as “rentals” and “landlady” (Figure 13). Ms.

Temple intends to invest and build houses in California, including the “Colina Cottages”, where she is going to live in one and rent the other. In 1926, her address changes to “2 Colina Hill” (Figure 13), the second of the “Colina Cottages”, to the west of the first “Colina Cottage”, the subject dwelling with address: “1 Colina Hill”.
[NOTE: Address history]
Between 1922-1931, the address is “1 Colina Hill”. Following the move to 4 digit addresses in 1931, the property is identified as “4901 Colina Dr” (Figure 38b), and later in the 1980’s “4987 Colina Dr”.

Her address is 2 Colina Hill i.e. the second bungalow or “Colina Cottage”, in 1926 and 1930, indicating she is likely living next to the subject dwelling occupied by the Kings. In 1931, with the introduction of the four digit address system, her address changes to 4903 Colina Dr. (formerly 2 Colina Hill), which is next to the subject dwelling at 4901 Colina Dr. (formerly 1 Colina Hill).

Ms. Temple’s business of “rentals” explains the arrangement with the Kings who “purchased” the property in 1927, possible with a mortgage agreement from Temple, but don’t receive full title until 1937. Ms.

Temple lived in the bungalow to the west and rented 4987 to Charlotte King, eventually transferring full title in 1937.

In 1928, Annie Temple is an active member of the Woman’s Club (Figure 14). In 1931 she writes an editorial denouncing the defacing of local hills by high school kids (Figure 15). She is also part of congregational church in La Mesa in 1931 (Figure 16).

Jane Judson is the co-owner and development partner of the Colina Cottages. She first appears in the San Diego directory in 1922 (Figure 17), and was the professional and financial partner of Ms. Temple.

While we know she is a partner in buying property with Annie, the full nature of the relationship is unclear.

She’s noted as working with the Marston's Department Store Company in the 1922 directory with an

Page 126 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 13
address in La Mesa (Figure 17). Jane was also an investor and speculator with various real estate deals in La Mesa (Figure 18).

The partnership of Ms. Temple and Ms. Judson represents a very interesting history of enterprising women in the early history of La Mesa, specifically of the Colina Del Sol subdivision.

Charlotte and John E. King
Ms. Charlotte King and Mr. John E King are the first residents of the property, as indicated from records in 1924 with a residence at 1 Colina Hill (Figure 38) and the name “King” on Lot 11 of the Colina Del Sol subdivision (Figure 7). Given the record of Ms. Temple and Judson’s plans to rent the bungalows, the Kings were likely renting from 1922-1927. Between 1927 and 1937, Charlotte King lives in the house under an agreement with Miss Temple to purchase the property, possibly with mortgage from Ms. Temple. In 1933, Ms. King declares a homestead on the property and in 1937, receives full title from Ms. Temple. During the period 1923-1931, Ms Temple likely lived in the second “Colina Cottage” bungalow to the west of this property. In 1931, Charlotte King hires D.C. Marker to build the garage.

Ms. Charlotte King is the longest resident of the house, with records confirming residence from 1922-1956 (Figure 38). While originally occupying the home with her husband, Mr. John E. King, she continued to live in the home following his death in 1924 until her death in 1956.

John King was born in Ireland in 1862, immigrated to Brooklyn, NY and served in the military, including during World War One, released to inactive duty in 1919 (Figure 23). After discharge, he lived in Montclair New Jersey with his wife Charlotte Kings, near Charlotte’s family. Bookkeeping was his specialty.

As early residents, they were leaders in the community, and Mr. King was an early vocal ambassador of La Mesa, exemplified in all aspects of his life as detailed below. He was also very enterprising and involved many businesses and social scenes: (insurance, Coolidge Club, realty boards, early member of La Mesa Country Club, Chamber of Commerce, and many activities promoting the growth of La Mesa).

John E. King was 17 years older than Charlotte. The couple arrived via cruise in LA in 1922. The earliest record in San Diego County is January 1922, saying that that Mr. and Mrs. J E King are in San Diego for winter travel. First local record is lunch at the Grossmont Inn. He liked to golf and joined brand new La Mesa Country Club (Figure 20). At this time, he starts to come out of retirement and starts becoming very active in business life in La Mesa, becomes very active socially, and becomes a staunch ambassador of life in La Mesa.

Mrs. king and her mother, Mrs. Culmer, who also moved to La Mesa, are very active in the social scene. As a typical example, they accompany Mr. Light, who's also partnering create the new “Colina Del Sol” subdivision on a motor trip to La Jolla (Figure 22). The Kings are good friends with the Lights, also early residents of “Colina Del Sol”. They also stay in close contact with friends and family in New Jersey, entertaining and receiving visitors from Montclair and return to visit family but always return home to La Mesa, indicating they have a permanent residence in one of the bungalows. Charlotte’s mother is living in La Mesa at this time (Figure 21).

Page 127 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 14
Charlotte is a member of Woman’s club her entire life in La Mesa. The regular meeting of the book section of the La Mesa Woman’s club took place in the King house (Figure 25). And she is chairman of hostess committee in 1924 (Figure 26).

In May 1923, John King enters the insurance business. (Figure 28, Figure 29), with an article noting in May of 1923 that he's entered into the insurance business and he's on the side door next to the theater, the current location of Por Favor restaurant. That site originally was what was called the Opera House, which was a theater. His office was in the building next door, right in the center of downtown. At this time, he's also involved in fire insurance, house insurance, and he's selling real estate: his retired life appears to be over at this point. He also starts doing investment bonds, real estate bonds, many different activities, such as real estate gold bonds.

Early 1923, King gets into real estate, and in July 1923, with the La Mesa Scout reporting “J.E. King now has “a corner on real estate” (Figure 28), a reference to his office location at the corner of Lookout and Palm Ave. He is advocating for and selling La Mesa. One example of Mr. King’s advocacy of La Mesa is of C.W. Anderson (Figure 24), who moved from Montclair, NJ (former hometown of Mr. King), and purchased a lot on Rose Cliffs from J.E. King, noting that he became interested by J. E. King, “a warm booster for our city and a former resident of Montclair”.

In one real estate advertisement in 1923 in the Evening Tribune, Mr. King describes La Mesa as an “Ideal Residence Suburb… mild climate, sunshine, flowers, restful, peaceful, grand views” and a “King Service… offered to those who are interested in real estate of any kind or in rentals” (Figure 27).

He is becoming a main player in the business community with a lot of activity at this time late 1922-1924, while living at the Colina Cottage on 1 Colina Hill, the subject dwelling, later 4987 Colina Dr. He joins the Chamber of Commerce, and he's part of an appointed committee to coordinate activities for the Chamber of Commerce (Figure 33), e.g., exhibiting at the county fair. He’s bought out an insurance company (Figure 29), and is selling real estate gold bonds (Figure 30). All of this activity is from late 1922 into summer 1923, during which he was exceptionally active in all aspects of life in La Mesa. He leads the realty board formation in the area (Figure 34) and he's listed in the countywide realty board (Figure 35). He is part of the Coolidge Club (Figure 36). In early 1924, he's supporting the bond for the new La Mesa and Spring Valley Irrigation District (Figure 37)for the irrigation district, an important infrastructure development, and meets with many groups to discuss the importance of this initiative.

In 1924, a woman working at the office next door to him gets a phone call from downtown San Diego that her father had died after being hit by a trolley car. John offers to drive her downtown, gets his car, pulls it up in front of the office, has a massive heart attack and dies on the spot. Several articles go into great detail about the irony of the circumstances, e.g. “death follows death”.

In his obituary, it notes that “Mr. King engaged in the real estate business here, and from his advent into business was very highly public-spirited, took a sincere interest in the advancement of the community and was an ardent and enthusiastic La Mesan” (Figure 31).

Charlotte King lives until her death in 1956 (Figure 38), and continues to be very active in the Woman’s club and social life.

Page 128 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 15
In 1931, the address changes to 4 digits address – first 4901, and later 4987.

Given they both contributed to the early growth of the La Mesa, with Charlotte living in the house for over 30 years, it would be appropriate to name this house the “Charlotte and John E. King House” given their ardent support of the city.
1958-1962
Henry Burrell (Figure 39): Lived at the address for 4 years and later built a house down the street (5000 Colina Dr.). He owned a silk screen company (Figure 39). He had a daughter named Michael who was in the Women’s Air Corps in the 1960’s (Figure 39c).
1962-1963: Lloyd Fulton Vandusen shows up in directories with ownership from 1962-1963 (Figure 40) 1964-1969: Richard Gordon, who might be part of an older family. Not much background information except that his brother was killed in the war (Figure 41). 1970-72: Records show ownership by Edward N Patton from 1972-1973 (Figure 42) 1978-2002: Raymond and Florence Uyeda
Raymond Uyeda
The historical inventory lists the “Uyeda House” as the common name with “Charlotte King House” as the historic name.

Mr. Raymond Uyeda owned the property from 1978-2002 with his wide Florence (Figure 43). Raymond was a Japanese American, and Florence (b. Fusaa Kida) was from the Kida family that pre-dates WW2.

Florence went to Grossmont High and the Kidas were one of approximately 20 families with students attending Grossmont High that were interned. Raymond and Florence were married in 1954.

Raymond worked for the County of San Diego as a microbiologist for the Public Health Department that performed water testing for the county (Figure 45). Raymond shows up as the owner in 1984, and appears to have lived in the subject dwelling from 1978-2002. Florence died in 2010 (Figure 44).

During this period, the address changes to 4987 Colina Dr., with a record of the new address in 1995 (Figure 46).

An ad in the San Diego Union-Tribune in 2002 (Figure 47) describes the subject dwelling as “Historic Home w/ view and private steps to village”

Page 129 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 16
Craftsman Bungalow Residential Architecture
Craftsman Bungalow residential architecture gained popularity in the United States as a suburban style from 1905 to the early 1920s. The Craftsman architectural style in Southern California was popularized by the work of Charles and Henry Greene, architects who practiced in Pasadena from 1893 to 1914. The Greenes had been influenced by the Arts & Crafts movement in England, a movement that placed emphasis on the use of natural materials and fine hand craftsmanship to produce not just architecture, but furniture, fabrics, and decorative arts as well. With the rise in popularity of high style Craftsman homes such as those designed by the Greene brothers, demand for more modest versions grew, and regional architects and builders stepped in with their own versions of the Craftsman style. Eventually pattern books brought the Craftsman style to the working class and allowed a small and easy to construct version, a Craftsman Bungalow, to be delivered to a building site for construction by local builders and homeowners.

Character defining features of the Craftsman architectural style include, but are not limited to: one, one and one-half, or two story massing; a low to medium pitch gable or hipped roof, with dormers present on one and one-half story varieties; wide eave overhangs, with exposed rafters and projecting rafter tails; triangular knee braces in the gable ends; exterior finish of shingle, horizontal wood, brick, or stucco, sometimes in combination; a front porch, full or partial width, supported by columns or posts; wood windows, generally double-hung or casement, with awning or hopper windows used less frequently, and Chicago-style arrangements of a fixed window flanked by double hung windows frequently seen on the front façade.

The property retains a good level of architectural integrity from its 1922-1949 period of significance, and exhibits character defining features of the Craftsman Bungalow style, including: one story massing; a medium-pitched gable roof; wide eave overhangs, with exposed rafters; exterior finish of wood shingle siding; a wide brick chimney base which steps up narrower as it protrudes through the roofline, with threeover-one wood windows on each side; double-hung, fixed, and casement wood windows, and a Chicagostyle arrangement of a large fixed window, of four-over-one, flanked by multi-light casement windows on the front façade. The dwelling retains a good level of architectural integrity of location, setting, workmanship, and feeling, with a fair level of integrity of design and materials, and qualifies for historical designation under Criterion C, for the Craftsman Bungalow style.

Significance Conclusion
The 4987 Colina Drive property represents Craftsman Bungalow architecture, consistent with the characterdefining features of the style, as detailed in the paragraph above. It is eligible for designation by the City of La Mesa under Historic Preservation Commission Criterion A as a special element of Colina Del Sol’s architectural and landscaping development; the house is one of two properties developed by Annie Temple and Jane Judson under their “Colina Cottages” plan and features a path linking the two properties accessible from Orchard Avenue via the “easy graded footpath with steps” they had constructed along with grading Colina Drive; and under Criterion C for its embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of the Craftsman Bungalow style of architecture. The period of significance under Criterion A is 1922, when the dwelling was designed and constructed, Colina Drive was graded, and the concrete stairs were built from Orchard Avenue to the south side of the property. The period of significance under Criterion C is 1922- 1949, when the dwelling was designed and constructed, the garage was designed and constructed, and the back porch was added. In its current configuration and appearance, the 4987 Colina Drive property

Page 130 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 17
retains a moderate level of integrity including Location: it has remained in its original place since its original construction of the dwelling in 1922, its original construction of the garage in 1931, and the original construction of the back porch at an unknown date between 1929 and 1949; Design: its original form, plan, space, structure, and style is intact on the original east portion of the dwelling, although the front entryway was enclosed with multi-light casement windows and French doors, modifications to the dwelling’s plan and layout occurred in 2009 when an addition was constructed on the west portion of the dwelling, the character-defining features remain on the original dwelling and were included on the addition; Setting: the residential development patterns, house massing, and aesthetic of the surrounding Colina Del Sol subdivision remain in place; Materials: existing historic wood framed windows and door patterns, wide brick chimney, exposed rafters and decorative wood beams, and wood siding on the garage are consistent with the original materials, while newer wood doors and windows were added to the front façade and an addition was constructed in 2009 replacing some original windows with vinyl windows as well as either replacing the original wood shingle siding in-kind with new wood shingles or new wood shingles were added on top of the original wood shingles; Workmanship: quality workmanship is evident in the original construction, design, fabrication and finishing details, the porch enclosure and 2009 addition also reflect quality workmanship; Feeling: the property’s appearance and location on Colina Drive conveys and evokes a feeling of Craftsman Bungalow architecture and the residential development of the Colina Del Sol subdivision; Association: does not apply to this property.

Page 131 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 18
IV. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Figure 1: Historic Resources Inventory Document for 4901/4987 Colina Dr.

Page 132 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 19

Page 133 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 20

Page 134 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 21

Page 135 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 22

Page 136 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 23
Figure 2: Assessment Roll of Property within the City of La Mesa 1922-23

Page 137 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 24

Page 138 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 25

Page 139 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 26
Figure 3: County Building Record

Page 140 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 27
Figure 4: Residential Building Record

Page 141 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 28

Page 142 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 29

Page 143 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 30

Page 144 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 31

Page 145 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 32

Page 146 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 33
Figure 5: La Mesa Colony Lot 69 (Map 1102)

Page 147 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 34
Figure 6: Colina Del Sol with signature by Annie Temple, Jane Judson, and Charlotte King. Back side of Map 2094.

Page 148 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 35
Figure 7: Colina Del Sol Subdivision (~1922)

Page 149 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 36
Figure 8: Article in the La Mesa Scout (March 24, 1922) references naming the hill "Colina Del Sol" and plan to build bungalows known as the "Colina Cottages"

Page 150 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 37
Figure 9: The Light Tract (Map No. 2496)

Page 151 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 38
Figure 10: Assessor's Parcel Map (Lot 11)

Page 152 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 39
Figure 11: Assessor’s Parcel Map (Por 69)

Page 153 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 40
Figure 12: Annie B Temple (b. 1865)

Page 154 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 41
Figure 13: Annie Temple: Palm and Orchard (1922); 2 Colina Hill i.e. “west” Colina Cottage, later 4903 Colina Dr. (1926-1931); Occupation “Rentals” and “Landlady”

Page 155 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 42

Page 156 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 43

Page 157 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 44
Figure 14: Annie Temple (member of Woman's Club)

Page 158 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 45
Figure 15: Annie Temple editorial

Page 159 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 46
Figure 16: Annie Temple (Congregational Church)

Page 160 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 47
Figure 17: Jane Judson (Marston's Department Store)

Page 161 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 48
Figure 18: Jane Judson

Page 162 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 49
Figure 19: Record of Annie Temple communication with D.C. Marker

Page 163 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 50

Page 164 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 51
Figure 20: John E. King, founding member of La Mesa CC

Page 165 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 52
Figure 21: Mrs. Katherine Culmer (Charlotte's mother), living in La Mesa

Page 166 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 53
Figure 22

Page 167 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 54
Figure 23: Military service of John E. King

Page 168 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 55
Figure 24: John E. King advocating to Mr. Anderson

Page 169 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 56
Figure 25: Charlotte King hosts the monthly meeting of the book section of the La Mesa Woman's Club

Page 170 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 57
Figure 26: Charlotte KIng, Chairman of Hostess Committee

Page 171 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 58
Figure 27: John E. King real estate ad in the Evening Tribune (1923)

Page 172 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 59
Figure 28: J.E. King in La Mesa Scout (twice on same page): Insurance ad and "a corner on real estate"

Page 173 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 60
Figure 29: John E. King, Insurance Company

Page 174 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 61
Figure 30: John E. King, Real Estate Gold Bonds

Page 175 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 62
Figure 31: John E. King Obituary

Page 176 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 63
Figure 32

Page 177 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 64
Figure 33: John E. King, Chamber of Commerce

Page 178 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 65
Figure 34: John E. King, Realty Board

Page 179 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 66
Figure 35: County Realty Board

Page 180 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 67
Figure 36: John E. King, Coolidge Club

Page 181 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 68
Figure 37: La Mesa Irrigation District Water Bonds

Page 182 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 69
Figure 38: Record of occupancy by Ms. Charlotte King

Page 183 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 70

Page 184 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 71

Page 185 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 72

Page 186 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 73

Page 187 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 74
Figure 39: Henry Burrell

Page 188 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 75

Page 189 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 76

Page 190 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 77
Figure 40: Vandusen

Page 191 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 78
Figure 41: Richard Gordon

Page 192 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 79

Page 193 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 80

Page 194 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 81

Page 195 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 82

Page 196 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 83

Page 197 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 84
Figure 42: Edward N Patton

Page 198 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 85

Page 199 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 86

Page 200 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 87

Page 201 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 88
Figure 43: Raymond Uyeda and spouse, Florence Kida

Page 202 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 89
Figure 44: Raymond and Florence (Fusaa) Uyeda

Page 203 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 90
Figure 45: Raymond Uyeda, Microbiologist - County Public Health

Page 204 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 91

Page 205 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 92

Page 206 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 93

Page 207 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 94
Figure 46: Change to 4987 Colina Dr.

Figure 47: Real Estate Ad for 4987 Colina in the San Diego Union-Tribune

Page 208 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 95
Figure 48: Owner and resident 2002-2022, Keith and Danae Dehne

Page 209 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 96
Figure 49: 1929 Sanborn Map

Page 210 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 97
Figure 50: 1949 Sanborn Map

Page 211 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 98
Figure 51: East and south elevation
Figure 52: East elevation

Page 212 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 99
Figure 53: East and north elevations

Page 213 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 100
Figure 54: North elevation
Figure 55: North elevation

Page 214 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 101

Page 215 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 102
Figure 56: North elevation corner

Page 216 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 103
Figure 57: Western elevation
Figure 58: Western elevation

Page 217 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 104
Figure 59: Southern elevation porch (door facing west)
Figure 60: Southen elevation; one of two multi-light casement windows flanking the chimney

Page 218 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 105
Figure 61: South elevation

Page 219 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 106
Figure 62: Southern elevation; two original case windows flanking chimney Figure 63: West elevation porch; window facing south, door facing west

Page 220 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 107
Figure 64: South elevation; original chimney
Figure 65: South elevation; second original casement window east of chimney

Page 221 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 108
Figure 66: South elevation and east elevation
Figure 67: East elevation; Chicago-style window

Page 222 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 109
Figure 68: East elevation; entrance

Page 223 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 110
Figure 69: East elevation; one of two original large casement windows Figure 70: East elevation; second original laarge casement window

Page 224 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 111
Figure 71: Garage north and west elevation
Figure 72: Garage north and east elevation

Page 225 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 112
Figure 73: Garage south and west elevation
Figure 74" Garage south elevation siding and roof

Page 226 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 113
Figure 75: Garage north elevation from Colina Dr

Page 227 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 114
Figure 76: Garage redwood shingles
Figure 77: Driveway (facing west)

Page 228 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 115
Figure 78: Garage southern elevation and garden on east border fence Figure 79: Arch leading from driveway to stone path in front of east elevation

Page 229 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 116
Figure 80: Stone path outside east elevation
Figure 81: Stone path and dining area outside east elevation

Page 230 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 117
Figure 82: Dining area outside east elevation
Figure 83: Fountain near dining area outside east elevation

Page 231 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 118
Figure 84: Steps on east side of south garden

Page 232 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 119
Figure 85: South elevation from top of garden path
Figure 86: South elevation from gate at top of stairs leading to Orchard Ave.

Page 233 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 120
Figure 87: Gate leading to public steps leading to Orchard Ave (facing south)

Page 234 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 121
Figure 88:Steps leading to southen gate leading to Orchard Ave Figure 89: Steps leading to gate (top of stairs) from Orchard Ave

Page 235 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John King E. House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 122
Figure 90: Steps leading to gate from Orchard Ave
Figure 91: Batchelder Fireplace with original mantel and built in shelving (interior of south elevation)

Page 236 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination: Charlotte and John E. King House 4987 Colina Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942
September 2023 |Page 123
V. WORKS CITED/ENDNOTES
1 Cotton, J. Randall. “Ornamental Concrete Block Houses.” The Old-House Journal, XII, No. 8, Oct. 1984, p. 180. 2 Johnson, Hadley O., and Donna Regan. La Mesa Historic Landmark Nomination Form, 1995, p. 5, Reynolds/Lingren House.
3 “Building Permits in City Make Marvelous Growth Past Year.” The La Mesa Scout, 11 March 1921. 4 “Real Estate Transfers.” The San Diego Union, 7 January 1911. 5 “Obituary for Robert B. Stevens.” The San Diego Union, 30 August 1912. 6 “Real Estate Transfers.” The San Diego Union, 7 July 1919. 7 “George H. Moore Called by Death.” The La Mesa Scout, 22 March 1935. 8 “Johanna Moore.” The San Diego Union, 31 July 1941.
9 “Shirley Hardin.” The San Diego Union, 20 April 1952. 10 “Obituary for Anne von der Mehden 1930 - 2015.” The San Diego Union-Tribune, 29 November 2015.

Page 237 of 522 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 14, 2023
SUBJECT: PROJECT 2023-2284 (BOLDUC/YEH)

CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO DESIGNATE
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8406 HILLCREST
AVENUE, APN 494-434-01-00 AND 494-282-16-00 AS

A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND ESTABLISH A

PROPERTY PRESERVATION (MILLS ACT)

AGREEMENT FOR THE SITE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issue:

Does the property at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue qualify for designation as a historic landmark, and should the City enter into a property preservation (Mills Act) agreement with the owner?
Recommendation:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to 1) designate the property known as the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue as a historic landmark (Attachment A) and 2) enter into a Mills Act Property Preservation Agreement with the property owners (Attachment B).

Fiscal Impact:

The amount of property tax to the City would be reduced by approximately $550 annually. In exchange for discounted property taxes, the City receives guaranteed property maintenance and improvements to ensure the ongoing preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration as stipulated in a property preservation agreement. Well maintained historic landmarks can increase property values in the neighborhood.

Page 238 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 2 of 6
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
 Ensure safe and affordable homes for La Mesa's current and future residents
Environmental Review:

This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331.

BACKGROUND:

The Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan provides a framework for the City’s Historic Preservation program, of which a Register of Historic Landmarks is a key component. Chapter 25.03 of the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance provides for the designation of historic landmarks by the City Council. A cultural resource may be designated a historic landmark if it meets one or more of the eight criteria listed below.

A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship;
D. It is representative of the notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect;
E. It is identified with a person or groups who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City;
F. It embodies elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail materials, or craftsmanship;
G. It is an archeological or paleontological site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value; or
H. It is a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of sites, buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement.

Page 239 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 3 of 6
Alterations to historic landmarks are subject to development approval by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to ensure that cultural resources are being maintained in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

Properties with landmark designation are eligible for a reduced property tax assessment through the Mills Act, and the owners have applied for this benefit in conjunction with the landmark nomination. California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into property preservation agreements with owners of qualified historical properties to ensure the preservation, maintenance and restoration of historic properties through reduced property tax assessments. The preservation agreement has an initial 10-year term that automatically extends by one additional year on each anniversary of the effective date, unless either party files a notice of non-renewal.

The owners of 8406 Hillcrest Avenue have nominated their property to the local historic landmark registry. On October 3, 2023, the HPC conducted a public hearing and voted 4-0 to adopt resolutions (Attachments C and D) recommending that the City Council approve historical landmark designation and enter into a Mills Act Preservation Agreement with the owners.

DISCUSSION:

Situated prominently above the intersection of Hillcrest Avenue and Lemon Avenue, the property is known as the Chester Harritt Home in the Historic Resources Inventory (Attachment E). A vicinity map is shown below, and the Assessor Parcel map is provided as Attachment F.

As described in the nomination report
(Attachment E), Chester L. Harritt, the first
owner of the home, was a hydraulic
engineer who fought for and oversaw the
replacement of the leaking San Diego flume
with a carefully engineered piping system.

He also secured critical water agreements
and funding to ensure the long-term
security of La Mesa’s water supply. For
these accomplishments, the Chet Harritt
Dam at Lake Jennings bears his name. The
second owner, Commander Theodore S.

Coulbourn, US Navy Ret., served as the
City’s Recreation Commissioner and
campaign chairman for the City’s first Youth
Center, now the Community Center, in
MacArthur Park.

Page 240 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 4 of 6
The three-story Spanish Eclectic residence was designed by Master Architect William Henry Wheeler and constructed by Master Builder A.E. Dennstedt. Wheeler’s work includes the Balboa Theatre and the Ernestine Schumann-Heink residence on Grossmont. The property at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue is the designer’s only known residential project in La Mesa. The Dennstedts were prolific builders of custom and tract housing across San Diego, including 11 other properties on the City of San Diego’s Historical Register. For being the representative work of an acclaimed architect and builder, the HPC concluded the resource qualifies for landmark designation under Criterion D.

The residence is in excellent
condition. Significant architectural
features include a Spanish tile
roof, lightly textured stucco on the
exterior walls, heavy straight-cut
rafter beams with clipped corners,
and an arched portal with an
ornate “wrought iron” (steel) gate.

Also extant are the original
windows and shutters, fired hollow
clay pipe attic vents, original entry
light fixtures, tile inlays, and other
hardware. The only known exterior
alterations are to the basement,
which was converted from a
garage/carport in 1947. Other
contributing elements on the property include a detached garage, outdoor barbecue, perimeter site walls, original interior terrace walls, and backyard granite stairs. The HPC concluded that the resource is eligible for landmark designation under Criterion C for embodying distinctive characteristics of a style, type, and period and under Criterion F for embodying elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail, materials and craftsmanship.

With the landmark designation, the proposed historic name of the resource would be the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House to acknowledge the original owners and the design/ build partnership of two well-known masters of their time.

Mills Act Agreement
While the site and improvements are in excellent condition, the owners have identified a number of planned rehabilitation projects. Those improvements would be funded with

Page 241 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 5 of 6
the Mills Act tax savings and are therefore proposed for inclusion in the Mills Act agreement. The owners’ proposed timeline is as follows:
 Replace roof using the original clay tiles (by 2025)
 Install a main electrical panel to replace the current four-circuit subpanel (by 2025)
 Rewire the whole home from knob and tube electrical (by 2025)  Restore or replace in-kind all 32 of the home’s double-hung windows and one large picture window with the same exterior color, within the same window openings, and using the same window types, materials, and design, including dimensions and profiles (by 2025)
 Insulate attic (by 2025)
 Stabilize outdoor barbecue and refurbish internal parts of outdoor barbecue and sink (by 2025)
 Repair or replace wood door sills in-kind (by 2027)
 Install whole house fan and air conditioning (by 2027)  Replace basement awning on the west elevation in-kind (by 2028)  Restore or replace the wrought iron fence in the west elevation in-kind (by 2028)  Re-stucco, re-plaster and paint the home’s exterior to match existing texture and finish (by 2029)
Public Notice of Project
Notification of the November 14, 2023, public hearing to consider the historic landmark application and preservation agreement was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on November 2, 2023, and published in the Daily Transcript on November 3, 2023. No comments have been received.

Environmental Review:

The historic landmark nomination request is exempt from environmental review pursuant to categorical exemption Class 1, Existing Facilities and categorical exemption Class 31, Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation, as provided by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331, respectively.

Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility. Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the

Page 242 of 522 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: November 14, 2023
Page: 6 of 6
resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. None of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 apply.

CONCLUSION:

The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the draft resolutions provided as Attachments A and B to designate the property known as the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue as a historic landmark and execute a Mills Act Preservation Agreement.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:

Lynnette Santos
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments:

A. Draft Council Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation B. Draft Council Resolution for Mills Act Agreement
C. Resolution HPC 2023-05 Recommending Landmark Designation D. Resolution HPC 2023-06 Recommending a Mills Act Agreement E. Historic Resources Inventory Worksheet
F. Assessor Parcel Map Sheet
G. Historic Landmark Nomination Report

Page 243 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
DESIGNATING THE CHESTER L. AND ANNE HARRITT/WILLIAM HENRY WHEELER/A.E. DENNSTEDT HOUSE AT 8406 HILLCREST AVENUE, APN 494- 434-01-00 AND 494-282-16-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Vince Yeh and April Bolduc, owners of the property located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, APN 494-434-01-00 and 494-282-16-00 in the R2 (Medium Low Density Residential) zone, have submitted a request to designate the property as a local historic landmark of the City of La Mesa;
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of La Mesa held a duly noticed public hearing on October 3, 2023, and accepted public testimony in considering the request;
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission did adopt Resolution HPC 2023-05 on October 3, 2023, recommending to the City Council designation of the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House, located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, as a Historic Landmark;
WHEREAS, the City Council received and considered a staff report on the Historic Preservation Commission’s determination; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 2023, and accepted public testimony in considering Project 2023-2284, a request to designate the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue as a historic landmark in the City of La Mesa.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility.

Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. The project meets the criteria for the exemptions and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. Project 2023-2284 complies with Section 25.03.010 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Historic Landmark and Historic District Designation Criteria, finding that Criteria C, D, and F of the Section apply to the historical and cultural significance of the property.

Page 244 of 522 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The City Council designates the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House, located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue and further described in “Exhibit A”, attached thereto and made a part thereof, as a Historic Landmark.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14
th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 245 of 522 ends

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
PARCEL 1: (494-434-01-00)
ALL OF LOT 50 OF BOULDER HEIGHTS, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 2039, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 22, 1927.

PARCEL 2: (494-282-16-00)
THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 6 OF OUTLOOK TERRACE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 1186, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY, JUNE 6, 1909, WHICH SAID PORTION LIES EAST OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 90 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12; BEING EASTERLY 50 FEET OF SAID LOT 12.

Page 246 of 522 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY

PRESERVATION AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNERS OF THE HISTORIC
LANDMARK KNOWN AS THE CHESTER L. AND ANNE HARRITT/WILLIAM HENRY WHEELER/A.E. DENNSTEDT HOUSE LOCATED AT 8406 HILLCREST AVENUE, APN 494-434-01-00 AND 494-282-16-00
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Vince Yeh and April Bolduc, owners of the property located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, APN 494-434-01-00 and 494-282-16-00 in the R2 (Medium Low Density Residential) zone, wish to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of their historic property by entering into an Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement authorized under the Mills Act with the City;
WHEREAS, properties listed on the City of La Mesa Historic Landmarks Registry are eligible, by Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement, for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, also known as the Mills Act;
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, the City Council of the City of La Mesa adopted Resolution No. 2023-XX designating the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E.

Dennstedt House located at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue as a historic landmark; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 2023, considered a staff report, and accepted public testimony in considering the request for a Historic Landmark Property Preservation agreement.

THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331. Section 15301 exempts activities involving negligible or no expansion of use of an existing facility.

Section 15331 exempts the preservation and conservation of historical resources when carried out in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project serves to protect the resource by ensuring that future alterations are subject to the standards described in Section 15331. The project meets the criteria for the exemptions and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

2. That the project is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan.

3. That the project complies with California Government Code Sections 50280 et seq. as set forth in the Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

Page 247 of 522 ends

2. The Mayor is hereby authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City that certain Historic Landmark Property Preservation Agreement with Vince Yeh and April Bolduc, owners of the Historic Landmark known as the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, to be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk, subject to the following improvement schedule that shall be placed in a timeline as an attachment to the agreement:
a. Replace roof using the original clay tiles (by 2025) b. Install a main electrical panel to replace the four-circuit subpanel (by 2025) c. Rewire the whole home from knob and tube electrical (by 2025) d. Restore all 32 of the home’s double-hung windows and one large picture window in the same exterior color, within the same window openings, and using the same window types, materials, and design, including dimensions and profiles. If restoration is not feasible, replacement shall be in kind. (by 2025) e. Insulate attic (by 2025)
f. Stabilize outdoor barbecue and refurbish internal parts of outdoor barbecue and sink (by 2025)
g. Repair or replace wood door sills in-kind (by 2027)
h. Install whole house fan and air conditioning (by 2027) i. Replace basement awning on the west elevation in kind (by 2028) j. Restore or replace the wrought iron fence in the west elevation in kind (by 2028)
k. Re-stucco, re-plaster and paint the home’s exterior to match existing texture and finish (by 2029)
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2023- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 248 of 522 ends
Page 249 of 522 ends
Page 250 of 522 ends
Page 251 of 522 ends
Page 252 of 522 ends
Page 253 of 522 ends
Page 254 of 522 ends
Page 255 of 522 ends
Page 256 of 522 ends
Page 257 of 522 ends

Historic Landmark Nomination
September
2023
Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/
A.E. Dennstedt House
Prepared for: April Bolduc and Vince Yeh, Property Owners 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, La Mesa, California 91941
Submitted to: City of La Mesa, Community Development Department, Planning Division, Historic Preservation Commission,
8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California 91942
Prepared by:

Page 258 of 522 ends

1 Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by S Curve Strategies. A technical review was completed by Ginger Weatherford | Historic Preservation Consulting. The research was performed in partnership with the La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 259 of 522 ends

2 Table of Contents
I. HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM .......................................................................3 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................8 South Elevation .........................................................................................................................9 East Elevation............................................................................................................................9 North Elevation..........................................................................................................................9 West Elevation (Main Façade)...................................................................................................9 III. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE........................................................................................10 Area of Significance 1: Architecture........................................................................................10 A. Designed by Master Architect William Henry Wheeler....................................................10 B. Built by Master Builder A. E. Dennstedt..........................................................................13 C. Spanish Eclectic Residential Architecture Style .............................................................14 Area of Significance 2: Agriculture, Community Planning, and Engineering ..........................17 A. Chester L. Harritt.............................................................................................................17 B. Commander Theodore S. Coulbourn..............................................................................20 Significance Conclusion..........................................................................................................20 IV. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION .....................................................................................22 Assessor’s Parcel Map............................................................................................................22 Subdivision Map......................................................................................................................26 Sanborn Map...........................................................................................................................27 Residential Building Record....................................................................................................28 Chain of Title ...........................................................................................................................37 City Directory Listings .............................................................................................................38 Deed and Notice of Completion..............................................................................................61 Historic Resources Inventory ..................................................................................................68 Previous Documentation.........................................................................................................74 Articles ....................................................................................................................................77 Historic and Transitional Photographs..................................................................................107 Current Photographs.............................................................................................................109

Page 260 of 522 ends

3 I. HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM

Page 261 of 522 ends

4

Page 262 of 522 ends

5

Page 263 of 522 ends

6

Page 264 of 522 ends

7

Page 265 of 522 ends

8 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The residence known as the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House stands as a distinguished exemplar of Spanish Eclectic architecture, emblematic of the period spanning 1915 to 1940. Constructed in 1935, this property is located on the USGS La Mesa Quadrangle, at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue, La Mesa, CA, 91941 (APN 494-434-01) at the intersection of Hillcrest Avenue and Lemon Avenue. The dwelling is a three-story Spanish Eclectic, approximately 2,455 square feet in area. A detached garage is located on a separate parcel (APN 494-282-16) and is also part of the request for historic designation or the total square footage.

The two parcels combined comprise an area of approximately 13,202 square feet and are prominently featured on a hill with views of Old Town La Mesa, Mount Nebo, Cowles Mountain, and beyond to La Jolla’s Mount Soledad. The three-bedroom, two-bath home boasts Spanish Eclectic architecture with a clay tile roof and stucco walls throughout the exterior; wood, tile inlays, and natural stone add to the stunning architecture of the dwelling. The wood door entrance with a tile inlay landing leads to a large living room and fireplace with panoramic views. The front yard is adorned with mature natural landscape with accent stone walkways and stairs. The property is in excellent condition.

The original Spanish-fired red clay “Angulo” two-piece Mission-style roof tile and the white Mission finish stucco both are consistent with the original materials. Fired hollow clay pipe attic vents are located throughout the exterior. There are 4” thick, straight-cut rafter beams with clipped corners, 26” in the center under the exposed roof eaves.

The stucco has a relatively smooth, undulating texture with coarse river sand in the valleys typical of the period. The single and double sash windows are another architecturally defining element to this house. These types of windows are found in North Africa, Spain, and Mexico and are a common feature of the Spanish Eclectic home in San Diego.

The public views of this corner house involve the west, south, and east elevations. The primary public view of the Harritt House at 8406 Hillcrest Avenue is from the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Hillcrest Avenue, looking due east toward the home’s west elevation. This view centers on its three stories with tile roof, original shutters, large living room picture window, balcony, and large awning-covered patio. This public view clearly shows the roof ridgeline, Mission half-barrel tiles, exposed rafter tails, smooth stucco walls, double-hung windows, and wood faux shutters. Each of these features are architecturally defining element of the house.

There is a slope in the sidewalk along the frontage of this west elevation street-level floor like a driveway slope. The enclosed basement was at one time a garage or carport; however, there are no photos of this. This is the only exterior modification made to the house, with records showing this original lower-level space was enclosed as a “rumpus room,” as stated in the 1947 permit from the second homeowner.

Page 266 of 522 ends

9 The daughter of the previous owners who lived in the house from 1972 to 2022 confirmed the basement was enclosed when they moved in.

Significant architectural features of the home include the conical shape of the Spanish tile roof, a curved stucco cornice, and fired hollow clay tile attic vents. Leading to the front steps of the arched portal is an ornate “wrought iron” (steel) gate that is a defining element of the dwelling.

The mail slot lid and street address plaque are both 1920s -1930s period and original to the house. The porch lamps flanking the tower entrance are original fixtures visible in the 1935 newspaper photo. They are charming in design and contribute to the architectural significance of the home.

Other standout elements include the outdoor barbecue, perimeter site walls, original interior terrace walls, and backyard granite stairs.

South Elevation
The front door of the home is located on its south elevation, while the stairs to the front door begin on the east elevation. The south elevation is only partially visible from the street due to large pine trees and dense vegetation blocking the view from the street. The previous owner who purchased the home in 1972 installed a matching stucco retaining wall around the front yard that changed the original cement pathway to the front door from the south to tiled steps from the east side of the home. Other original details include the wood front door, mailbox, and doorbell.

East Elevation
The east elevation of the home is mostly obscured by a row of Bottle Brush bushes in front of a long 6’ stucco wall. The wall features three blue-arched wooden gates that connect to the detached garage. The detached garage is located on a separate parcel also owned by the homeowners.

North Elevation
The north elevation is mostly obscured from public view. In this location, the first of three separate patios is located off the kitchen with a built-in barbecue and sink. The second and third patios are large, entertainment-size courtyards with mature palm, fir, and pine trees as well as mature landscape shrubbery. The second patio has stairs leading to the home’s family room and the third is off the master bedroom. Granite and wood comprise the patio stairways.

West Elevation (Main Façade)
The west elevation features the most prominent and public side of the home and features a balcony, a lower-level patio with a wrought iron/steel fence and gate, lattice fencing enclosing a native plant garden with robust bougainvillea and a matching stucco retaining wall. All three

Page 267 of 522 ends

10 stories of the home are visible from Hillcrest Avenue, and the cobalt blue shutters create a striking contrast to the white stucco exterior.

III. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
The City of La Mesa Historical Landmark Nomination Form “Areas of Significance” for the Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House Include Architecture, Agriculture, Community Planning, and Engineering. The home’s architecture is significant due to being designed by Master Architect William Henry Wheeler in the Spanish Eclectic style and built by Master Builder Aaron Edward (A.E.) Dennstedt in 1935.

The original homeowners make up a combination of the Areas of Significance for Agriculture, Community Planning, and Engineering due to the water agreement that Chester L. Harritt negotiated as manager of the La Mesa, Lemon Grove, and Spring Valley Irrigation District (now known as Helix Water District). This agreement ensured water delivery to the City of La Mesa and exists in place today. Harritt was the hydraulic engineer who oversaw the building of infrastructure to carry this water to the city. The Chet Harritt Dam was named in his honor.

The second homeowner also fulfills the Area of Significance for Community Planning due to the role of Retired Commander Theodore S. Coulbourn, US Navy, as the chairman of the campaign to build the first youth center in La Mesa, at the now MacArthur Park.

Area of Significance 1: Architecture
A. Designed by Master Architect William Henry Wheeler
The Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House was designed by prominent Master Architect William Henry Wheeler (1874 - 1956). Wheeler would have been 62 years old when the house was completed in 1935. It was built by Master Builder A.E.

Dennstedt. This partnership by two well-known masters of their time underscores the rarity and significance of the Hillcrest Avenue residence. Notably, Wheeler was an employee of A.E.

Dennstedt and his brother A.I. Dennstedt designing many prominent homes and commercial buildings.

While the Hillcrest Avenue home is the only known La Mesa residence built by the master architect, Wheeler was not new to this neighborhood. In 1930, just two blocks away Wheeler designed the Erickson Mortuary in a similar Spanish Colonial Revival style, and it still stands today.

Page 268 of 522 ends

11 Wheeler's imprint on the
architectural fabric throughout
San Diego County is marked
by a series of notable
commissions. They
encompass landmarks such
as the Balboa Theater in San
Diego’s Gaslamp District
named in honor of Vasco
Nuñez de Balboa, the first
European to discover the
Pacific Ocean in 1513.1 The
interior of the theatre reflects
a 1920s theatre eclecticism
that blends Wheeler’s Spanish
and Moorish Revival style with Mediterranean Classicism. Wheeler was a known opera singer and performer himself, and the design also reveals the performer/architect's touches in ways that appreciative modern musicians and performers have noted were designed by someone who had to have been a performer himself. For example, the orchestra pit is larger than most legitimate theatres of this capacity and can accommodate 30 to 40 pieces with excellent access. There are 14 dressing rooms in the basement. The unamplified sound delivery is unusually efficient and excellent for both music and theatre.2 The Balboa Theater is one of the last remaining theatres from the 1920s still in existence in San Diego.

Wheeler’s other well-known designs include Temple Beth Israel, All Saints Episcopal Church, Thomas Sefton residence on Henry Street in San Diego, and Madame McAlester and Ernestine Schumann-Heink residences, among others. Wheeler credits his frequent travel through Mexico as having a large impact on his design aesthetic.3 Originating from Australia in 1874, Wheeler's early affinity for architecture culminated in an apprenticeship undertaken in Melbourne at a young age. Following a period of skill cultivation, he embarked on a trajectory that traversed Vancouver, Canada, eventually steering him towards the diverse landscape of San Francisco, which he perceived as fertile ground for his professional aspirations. Subsequently, he pursued advanced engineering studies at the University of California, Berkeley. These formative experiences led him to establish his roots in 1 The Balboa Theater: A Preservation Project Completed, San Diego History Center. https://sandiegohistory.org/journal/v54- 2/pdf/v54-2engstrand.pdf
2 National Register of Historic Places: Balboa Theater Registration Form. https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/4ec16cce-9ba0- 41ad-a19d-82fd44ecc118
3 San Diego History Center. (n.d). Burlingame. https://sandiegohistory.org/journal/1993/july/burlingame/

Page 269 of 522 ends

12 San Diego in 1912, catalyzed by a significant personal juncture, the loss of his first wife Mabel F. Severance.4
The distinction of Wheeler's designation as a Master Architect is substantiated through meticulous historical research, exemplified by the architectural finesse exhibited at 2174 Guy Street in San Diego (1926), and noted by the Historical Resource Board (HRB) #766 as the Percy Benbough/William Wheeler House. This residence signifies the embodiment of Wheeler’s mastery and is a testament to his versatility of styles from the elegance of Spanish Colonial to the grandeur of Italian Renaissance, and the Colonial Revival, among others. This nuanced approach is reflective of Wheeler's multifaceted sensibilities, extending beyond architecture to encompass diverse interests such as opera performances, theatrical pursuits, and affiliations with esteemed organizations including Freemasonry, Shriners, and the American Legion.

Of particular significance is Wheeler's instrumental role in advocating for architectural licensure, evident through his leadership roles within professional associations such as founding the San Diego chapter of the American Institute of Architects and being appointed by the Governor of California as President of the State Board of Architecture where he would hold the title for eight years.5
Wheeler's enduring legacy resonates through his accomplished progeny: Richard G. Wheeler (1917-1990),6 who formed the prominent architectural firm RWG & Associates in 1947,7 and Henry L. Wheeler, a respected figure within the general contracting industry in San Diego.

Wheeler's architectural legacy continues to permeate the architectural discourse of the region, leaving a lasting imprint upon San Diego's built environment and heritage.

The historic contributions of Wheeler are staggering. Among those are the following in order of the year built:
● Dr. Harry & Rachel Granger Wegeforth Residence, 3004 Laurel St., San Diego (1912) ● With Halley: O. Walter Strange Residence 9530 La Jolla Shores Dr., La Jolla (1914) ● Whiteman House, 2523 San Marcos Ave., San Diego (1915) ● Madame McAlester and Ernestine Schumann-Heink Residence, 8369 University Ave., La Mesa (1916)
● Eagle’s Hall, 733 Eighth Ave., San Diego (1917)
● Vegetable Canning Plant, G St., San Diego (1917)
4 Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada 1800-1950. (n.d.). http://dictionaryofarchitectsincanada.org/node/2271 5 The City of San Diego. Biographies of Established Masters. (2020) http://www.sohosandiego.org/enews/images/0121hrbmasterslist2020.pdf 6 Coronado Historical Association. Architect Wednesday: Richard George Wheeler. https://coronadohistory.org/blog/architectwednesday-richard-george-wheeler/ 7 Modern San Diego. https://modernsandiego.com/people/richard-wheeler

Page 270 of 522 ends

13 ● St. Mary's Church, El Cajon (1917)
● Steele Packing Company, Foot of Juniper St., San Diego (1918) – where Solar Turbines is now
● Arrow Packing Company, Foot of Juniper St., San Diego (1918) ● Citrus/Pacific Soap Factory, 301 West Market St., San Diego (1921) ● Plymouth Church, Oregon Street and University Ave., San Diego (1922) ● Western Cotton Product Company's Mfg. Plant, National City (1922) ● Angeles Temple for Aimee Semple McPherson, 1100 Glendale Blvd., Echo Park, Los Angeles (1923)
● Mission Theatre, 1245 5th Ave., San Diego, CA (1924)
● YMCA at Rockwell Field, North Island, San Diego (1924) ● Balboa Theatre, 648 Fourth Ave., San Diego (1924)
● Coliseum Athletic Club, Fifteenth Avenue and E Street, San Diego (1924) ● San Diego Unified School District, Encanto School, 822 65th St., San Diego (1924) ● Arlington and Highlands Elementary School, 1717 Seventh Ave., Los Angeles, CA (1924)
● Home for Needy Children, (Boy's and Girl's Aid Society), 4285 Third St., San Diego (1924)
● Percy Benbough/William Wheeler/Dennstedt House 2174 Guy St., San Diego (1926) – Wheeler lived adjacent to this home when he passed in 1956 ● Congregation Beth Israel Temple, Third and Laurel Streets, San Diego (1926) ● Earl C. Anthony automobile agency, Front and B Streets, San Diego (1926) ● Residence for Godfrey S. Strobeck, Guy and Witherby Streets, San Diego (1926) ● Elliot Street Residence, 3726 Elliot St., San Diego (1927) ● Agua Caliente: Casino, hotel, pool and golf course with Gordon E. Mayer, Tijuana, Mexico (1928)
● San Diego Athletic Club, 1250 Sixth Ave., San Diego (1926) ● All Saints Episcopal Church, 625 Pennsylvania Ave., San Diego (1926) ● Logan Heights Elementary School, 2875 Ocean View Blvd., San Diego (1929) ● Klauber-Wangenheim Building, 611 Island Ave., San Diego (1929) ● Erickson Mortuary, Allison Street, La Mesa (1930)
● Eagle’s Hall remodel, 733 Eighth Ave., San Diego (1934) ● Lt. Earl and Mildred Delong/William H. Wheeler/A.I. and A.E. Dennstedt House, 4990 Westminster Ter., Kensington, San Diego (1935)
● Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House, 8406 Hillcrest Ave., La Mesa (1935) – pending designation
B. Built by Master Builder A. E. Dennstedt
The Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt House was built by A.E.

Dennstedt of the A.L. & A.E. Dennstedt Building Company who was established as a Master

Page 271 of 522 ends

14 Builder in 2007 with the designation of HRB Site #818, the Hazel Weir/Dennstedt Company House in La Jolla.8 The Dennstedt Company has built eleven other properties designated on the City of San Diego’s Historical Register including HRB #892, the Jean P. Hampton/A.L. & A.E. Dennstedt Building Company Spec House #1 located at 7015 Vista del Mar Avenue; HRB #1006, the Lt. Earl and Mildred De Long/William H. Wheeler/A.L. and A.E. Dennstedt House located 4990 Westminster Terrace; and HRB #1124, Jean P. Hampton/A.L. & A.E. Dennstedt Building Company Spec House #1 located at 4600 Kensington Drive.

The Dennstedt brothers came to San Diego from Minnesota in 1924 and soon began their careers as builders. They became well known as a design-build company producing high quality custom homes with financing options. By the mid-1930s, the Dennstedt Company split, and the resulting companies continued in custom home construction. The Dennstedt Company produced houses in the Spanish Eclectic, Mexican Hacienda, Tudor, English Monterrey, and Ranch styles in San Diego communities including North Park, Burlingame, Talmadge, Kensington, La Jolla, and Point Loma, as well as in Escondido and La Mesa. With several iterations of the firm name, the firm continued until 1988. The subject property is a significant example of the Dennstedt Company’s work as it retains a high level of integrity to its original 1935 design. While most of the Dennstedt Company’s Spanish Eclectic properties on the City’s register are grand in massing, this property exemplifies their broad range of work and highlights their attention to craftsmanship and detail.

Notable Works:
● HRB 535 Carlos and Blanche Livers House
● HRB 627 Antoine and Jeanne Frey House
● HRB 664 A.L. and Cleveland Dennstedt House
● HRB 806 Anne and Edward Lindley House
● HRB 818 Hazel Weir/Dennstedt Company House/Mut kula xuy/Mut lah hoy ya Site #4 ● HRB 892 Jean P. Hampton/A.L. & A.E. Dennstedt Building Company Spec House #1 C. Spanish Eclectic Residential Architecture Style
The Chester L. and Anne Harritt/William Henry Wheeler/A.E. Dennstedt was built in 1935 in the Spanish Eclectic architectural style best known from 1915 - 1940. Spanish eclectic architecture dominates large regions of California, Arizona, and Florida. The orange and red terra-cotta roofing defines the local architecture reflecting the abundant sunshine in these regions. Stucco is the next most important element in this style. Historically it covered adobe brick walls, but later was adapted to wood-frame construction and has proven to be forgiving and flexible.

Spanish eclectic style developed in the early 20th century and falls under the umbrella of Mediterranean architecture. Spanish, African, Latin American, and Native American influences 8 Biographies of Established Masters. (2011). https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/201109biographies.pdf

Page 272 of 522 ends

15 combined to provide a diverse and rich palette on which the style is built. The preceding Spanish colonial and mission styles confirm the eclectic’s base identity, which can also be referred to as Spanish colonial revival. Spanish colonial architecture is simpler, with less detail, and mission style reflects the characteristics of California’s Spanish missions established in the 18th century.9
The 1915 Panama-California Exposition in San Diego prompted tremendous national interest in the richness of Spanish architecture. The rapidly growing population in California easily adopted the architecture and incorporated the aesthetics into many different building types.

Character-defining features include terra cotta roofs, use of balconies, smooth stucco exterior walls (usually painted white), arched openings, thick wall dimensions, colorful tile work, ornamental vents and grille work at windows and doors, ornamental elaborations at windows and doors in the form of relief surrounds including the ornate Spanish Baroque Churrigueresque detailing. In the 1920s and 1930s architectural publications were readily disseminated worldwide including the American magazine Architecture that, in 1926, began a regular series of portfolios featuring traditional Spanish architectural details designed by U.S. architects. “These included Spanish Revival staples such as Iron Railings, Balconies, Garden, Pools, Patios, Window Grilles, and Outside Stairways.”10 According to architect and author Arrol Gellner:

The charismatic architecture of Spain, with its photogenic contrasts of light and shade and its sharply drawn wrought-iron ornament, remained a favorite subject of the trade magazines well into the thirties; as late as 1934, Architecture was still featuring measured drawings of Spanish-style details such as spindled window grilles in Santiago, Cuba.11
With notable civic and academic examples of the eclectic subtypes within the larger idiom of Spanish Revival architecture, San Diego’s architects and builders transformed the region’s residential landscape with innumerable examples of the eclectic Spanish Revival style. Two notable design-build companies that offered both modest and grand examples of residential and commercial buildings in the Spanish Revival / Spanish Eclectic style are the Dennstedt Building Company and the Olmstead Building Company, both recognized as Master Builders by the City of San Diego. The Master Architect most closely tied to the style locally is Richard Requa.

Basic stylistic features of the Spanish Eclectic/Spanish Revival style include:
● Asymmetrical façades
9 Times of San Diego. (2016). Weekend Design: All About California’s Spanish Eclectic Style. https://timesofsandiego.com/life/2016/11/05/weekend-design-all-about-californias-spanish-eclectic-style/ 10 Arrol Gellner. Red Tile Style: America’s Spanish Revival Architecture (Penguin Group, New York: 1982) 21 11 Ibid.

Page 273 of 522 ends

16 ● Arched windows and doorways
● Stucco or tile decorative vents
● Terra cotta roofing tiles
● Stucco siding
Most of these character-defining features should additionally be present to support an individual statement of significance:
● Towers or other vertical elements round or square in plan and massing ● Arcaded/arched wing walls
● Elaborate chimney tops
● Balconies or patios enclosed with wood or wrought iron railing Decorative tile work at the exterior and interior
● Decorative ironwork in the form of sconces, grill covers, door knockers ● Decorative chimney tops
● Sculptural (Churrigueresque) articulations at roof parapets or façade walls12 The Spanish fired red clay Mission style tiles found on the roof of 8406 Hillcrest Ave. are marked “Angulo.” The Angulo Roof Tile Works factory began in Santa Barbara and operated from 1919 to 1925. Reducindo and Virginia (Haros) Angulo first began making tiles in Santa Barbara in 1890, but that business was not successful. They started a second venture in 1919, which was the Angulo Roof Tile Works. Angulo inherited the family business from his parents, R.F. and Virginia Angulo. The Angulo Tile Factory fired the tiles higher than the Mexican kilns, creating a hard and dense ceramic that some people refer to as “quarry tile.” The Tile Heritage Foundation has further information on Angulo Roof Tile Works. Their address was 228 East De La Guerra Street in Santa Barbara, California.

William H. Angulo graduated from high school and then worked at the Angulo Roof Tile Works, which supported fifty employees at their two plants in Santa Barbara and Reseda, California.

They roofed the California Hotel, Packard Garage, St. Vincent’s Orphanage, County National Bank, and the Central, Parks, San Marcos, and Daily News buildings in Santa Barbara County.13 Based on the above information, the Angulo Roof tiles on the roof of 8406 Hillcrest Ave. are original materials. They are high-fired, high-quality tiles, and distinctive from the softer low-fired tiles found on many other local houses in the San Diego region. 12 Wendy Tinsley-Becker and Ginger Weatherford, Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC, Historical Resource. Research Report – 1025 Devonshire Drive, San Diego, CA 92107, September 2018. 13 History of Santa Barbara County, California, From its Earliest Settlement to the Present Time, by Michael James Phillips, 1927, and published by the S.J. Clarke Publishing Company.

Page 274 of 522 ends

17 Area of Significance 2: Agriculture, Community Planning, and Engineering
A. Chester L. Harritt
Chester “Chet” L. Harritt (1877 - 1948) and his wife Anne W. Harritt (1883 -1957) exemplify special elements of the La Mesa community. They moved to La Mesa in 1927 and purchased the Hillcrest Avenue land from S. C. Grable, who 20 years earlier had obtained 200 acres from a few fruit growers and divided it into 1,000 town lots.14 The Harritt’s lived at the Eucalyptus Reservoir until 1936 when they moved into the home designed by Wheeler and built by Dennstedt. Harritt is a person of significance to La Mesa and the surrounding communities in the areas of agriculture, community planning, and engineering due to an important water deal he struck with the City of San Diego while an engineer at the La Mesa, Lemon Grove, and Spring Valley Irrigation District, now known as the Helix Water District. The result of this water deal ensured The City of La Mesa would have sufficient storage capacity for water needed in dry years as well as significantly reducing the debt the city had accrued. This allowed the Irrigation District to lower rates and spur growth through land sales.

Harritt first became the Superintendent of the Cuyamaca Water Company (CWC) and a hydraulic engineer15 under the famous La Mesan Ed Fletcher (1872-1955),16 the real estate developer and California State Senator who built the Lake Murray Dam, and who Fletcher Hills and Fletcher Parkway are named after.17
The CWC was established in 1910 and
operated until 1926.18 The origins of the
CWC can be found in the San Diego Flume
Company.19
The San Diego Flume Company was
purchased on June 1, 1910, for $125,000
by Fletcher and Montana businessman
James A. Murray and transferred all water
rights and properties owned by the San
Diego Flume Company to the newly
14 San Diego County Genealogy Trail History Group, La Mesa. http://genealogytrails.com/cal/sdiego/la_mesa.htm 15 UC San Diego Library: Harritt, Chester (Fletcher’s hydraulic engineer) http://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb0820678h/ 16 San Diego History Center, Colonel Ed Fletcher. https://sandiegohistory.org/archives/biographysubject/edfletcher/ 17 City of La Mesa Website, Famous La Mesans. https://cityoflamesa.us/1260/Famous-LaMesans#:~:text=Ed%20Fletcher%20%2D%20Real%20Estate%20Developer,Fletcher%20Parkway%20are%20his%20namesakes 18 UC San Diego Library Digital Collections. (2020). Harritt, Chester (Fletcher's hydraulic engineer). http://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb0820678h/
19 Ramona Home Journal: The San Diego Flume. (2019). https://ramonajournal.com/the-san-diego-flume-p642-101.htm 1 Far Left: Chester L. Harritt inspecting the San Diego Flume.

Page 275 of 522 ends
← All documents from this meeting