La Mesa City Council
August 13, 2024

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 1

INFORMATION STATEMENT
Legal Name of Organization: BPR Consulting Group, LLC
Date Established: Partners have worked together for 17 years and as BPR Consulting Group since July 1, 2021.

Legal Status, i.e., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship: California Limited Liability Corporation Officers/Owners of Organization:

Name: Ron Beehler, SE, CBO Title: Principal / Partner
Name: Roger Peterson, SE Title: Principal / Partner
Name: Bill Rodgers, SE Title: Principal / Partner
Number of Employees: Permanent – Full Time: _36___ Part Time: _28____ Business Address - Corporate: 2201 Francisco Drive, #140-658 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Business Address – Southern California: 316 Tejon Place Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
Contact Information: Ron Beehler, Principal-in-Charge
[email protected]
Organization Bank Name: Chase
Branch: Folsom, CA
Address: 2750 East Bidwell Street, #400, Folsom, CA 95630 Contact Name: Travis Tremble, Senior Relationship Manager BPR Consulting Group maintains a sound financial standing with adequate cash reserves to meet the ongoing business needs of our firm. Additionally, BPR has no outstanding debt and neither BPR nor any of its principals has ever filed for bankruptcy.

Are you or your organization currently engaged or involved in any litigation over the proprietary rights or patent rights for the software or services to be used for the City of La Mesa? __________No___________ If yes, please attach explanation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 2

STATEMENT OF INTEREST
We understand that the City of La Mesa is looking to partner with an outside consultant who can provide Building and Fire Plan Review services to assist City staff in meeting plan review turnaround requirements and avoiding development delays. BPR is interested in providing these services to the City and has a positive track record of providing the requested services in a thorough, professional and customer-focused manner.

BPR’s staff members have previous experience providing these services for numerous California public agencies including the Cities of Gardena, Ontario, Eastvale, Imperial, Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Inglewood, Monterey Park, Wildomar, Anaheim, Rosemead, Newport Beach and Arroyo Grande
BPR’s staff of experienced building safety personnel provide high quality, thorough building and fire plan review services for our clients and their permit applicants. Unlike the large national firms, BPR’s services are focused on supporting California communities in the delivery of high-quality, building and fire department services, tailored to your community’s specific needs, with the goal of exceeding our clients’ expectations by:
 Providing all services in a cost-effective and timely manner.  Providing qualified and experienced personnel who have the ability to effectively communicate and explain relevant code requirements to designers, contractors, and owner builders.  Providing a high level of customer service for internal and external customers.  Balancing the need to ensure conformance to standards and regulations with the need for predictability, uniformity, and efficiency.

The team proposed to serve the City of La Mesa are appropriately licensed and possess all requested certifications.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 3

STATEMENT OF APPROACH
BPR understands the City of La Mesa is a full-service city with a population of approximately 73,000. The City has experienced an increase in development resulting in an increase in plan review submittals. Current staffing levels at the City are making it difficult to meet expected turnaround times and the City is looking to partner with experienced and qualified firms who can perform plan review services for building and fire permits. The addition of an outside consultant will enable the City to provide timely customer service as well as avoid development delays.

BPR has a team of experienced and appropriately licensed and certified professionals available to support the City and provide the requested Building and Fire Plan Review Services.

From the RFP, we understand and are ready to immediately provide the following services:
 BPR’s Plans Examiners can expect to spend a minimum of ten (10) hours per week providing plan review services to support the needs of the Building and Fire Department.  BPR’s Plans Examiners will meet or exceed the City’s required turnaround times of two (2) weeks for all first submittals and one (1) week for subsequent re-submittals.  BPR’s Plans Examiners are experienced in and prepared to provide all services remotely.  BPR staff will be available to discuss projects with applicants and City staff via phone and email during regular business hours as necessary.
 BPR staff will provide a high level of customer service to internal and external clients at all times.

BUILDING AND FIRE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES

PLAN REVIEW
BPR’s staff possesses significant technical capabilities in all areas of building and fire plans examination competency gained from years of experience providing these same services. All plans examiners are California Licensed Engineers or ICC Certified Plans Examiners with multiple years of experience providing plan review services. Our staff will provide expedited, accelerated, or project-specific phased plan reviews on an as-needed basis as requested by the City.

Plans examiners will provide comprehensive plan review services to the city and review submitted project documents for compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local codes and ordinances. Disciplines will include, but are not limited to Building, Fire, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical, Green Building, Energy Conservation, Geotechnical and Structural.

Our plans examiners have a thorough understanding of code requirements, are able to read, understand and interpret construction documents, energy calculations, geotechnical reports, structural calculations, electrical load calculations, commissioning reports, hydraulic calculations, hazardous materials reports, and other

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
associated design documents. Our plans examination staff have the ability to prepare well-written plan review letters, communicate effectively orally and in writing and work effectively with jurisdiction staff, project design teams, contractors and permit applicants. Our plans examiners possess knowledge of the most current state adopted building standards.

Architectural
BPR’s non-structural plans examiners have provided plan review services for a vast array of projects including large residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, retail, and OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 medical office buildings. Many of our plans examiners are CASP certified. Completed plan review projects range from single-story residential projects to complex high-rise commercial buildings and numerous building additions and remodels. We are experienced and familiar with the use and application of the most current editions of the following model codes:
 California Building Standards Code
(Title 24) Parts 1 through 6 and 9
 International Building Code (IBC)
 Americans with Disabilities Act
Standards for Accessible Design
 ANSI Standards
 NFPA Codes & Standards
 CA Code of Regulations (CCR) Titles 19 and 25
 Jurisdiction-Adopted Amendments or Ordinances
 CA Existing Building Code
 CA Historical Building Code
Structural
Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing building projects subjected to the significant seismic loads necessitated by the geographic location of the City of La Mesa. Our structural engineers have reviewed all types of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, and multi-story projects including mid-rise and high-rise projects, institutional projects, industrial projects, retail buildings, schools, medical office buildings and court facilities.

Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing projects constructed with all building materials including the following:
 Wood
 Reinforced Masonry
 Heavy Timber / Timber Frame / CLT
 Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete
 Stressed Skin Panels
 Structural Steel
 Light Gauge Steel Framing
 Straw Bale
 Rammed Earth
 Insulated Concrete Forms, (ICF)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Our engineers have designed or reviewed a wide array of structural lateral force resisting systems including:
 Structural steel moment frames
 Buckling-restrained braced frames
 Eccentric braced frames
 Concentric braced frames
 Concrete moment frames
 Wood shear wall systems
 Masonry shear wall systems
 Concrete shear wall systems
 Cantilevered column systems
 Pre-stressed and post-Tensioned Concrete
 Various proprietary lateral force resisting systems
Our structural engineers and inspectors are experienced with the provisions of most model codes including current versions of:
 CCR Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 2 & 2.5
 International Building Code (IBC)
 AISC 341, 358 and 360
 ASCE 7
 ASCE 41
 AISI Standards for Cold Formed Steel
 ANSI / AF&PA NDS for wood framing
 ACI 318
 ACI 530 / TMS 402/602
 CA Historic Building Codes
 CA Existing Building Codes
 NEHRP
Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical
BPR’s Mechanical and Electrical Engineers are well versed in the California Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical codes. We will review submitted design documents to ensure compliance to the current edition of the following codes:
 California Building Code
 California Residential Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Electrical Code
 Jurisdiction-adopted amendments
Specialty plan review services may be provided utilizing the most current editions of national standards including the following:
 International Building Code
 International Residential Code
 International Mechanical Code
 International Plumbing Code
 NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire
sprinkler systems)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 99 (medical gases)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
 NEHRP Requirements for Existing Building
Energy Compliance
Our engineers and plans examiners are up to date on all California Energy Code requirements as they relate to both new and remodel construction for all project types. Our staff have experience verifying CA Energy Code requirements for projects located within all climate zones. The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. These standards have

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
been updated since that time to address a multitude of building components, systems and equipment with the goal of having new and updated buildings be more energy efficient, comfortable for building occupants, and less reliant of fossil fuels.

Green Building Standards
BPR’s staff has a working knowledge of the proper incorporation of CALGreen building criteria into project designs and the resulting potential impact of these standards related to building code compliance and the environment. Our plans examiners will review project documents to verify compliance with adopted Green Building Code Standards as required by state law and local amendments and ordinances.

LEED
Developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED provides building owners and operators a framework for identifying and implementing measurable green building design methodologies, construction, operations, and building maintenance. LEED certification consists of a variety of rating systems applicable to multiple building types including commercial as well as residential. Ratings reflect a measure of how well a building performs across many sustainability metrics including: energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, indoor environmental quality, energy usage and the projects impact on the local environment.

Access Compliance & CASP Review
All BPR CASP-certified professionals are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. Our staff are experts in the industry, maintaining appropriate certifications demonstrating their expertise, and are experienced providing services for building departments in a seamless manner balanced and in coordination with our client’s expectations and needs. We work collaboratively with our clients to address accessibility plan review and inspection related issues as efficiently as possible.

Our plans examiners are fully trained and familiar with CA Building Code Accessibility requirements and ADA compliance requirements and are available for plan review and/or inspection services. We offer support to municipalities for compliance enforcement and/or developing transition plans. We can assist our clients in researching and providing interpretations of various specific issues related to access compliance including access compliance obligation, transition plan development, construction costs and phasing, and regulation interpretations.

Fire Code Plan Reviews
Our experienced and licensed professional Fire Protection Engineering staff and certified Fire Plans Examiners are properly trained and prepared to address your fire and life safety plan review needs. If requested, our fire safety plan review staff can quickly and accurately check plans for compliance with applicable fire codes and

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
standards. Our fire protection staff routinely review and inspect projects for compliance with CA Fire Code fire and life safety regulations.

Our Fire Plans Examiners have extensive experience in the use and application of the following model codes, standards, and regulations:
 California Fire Code (CFC) and California Building Code (CBC), with local amendments and regulations.  Adopted National Fire Protection Standards
 California Health and Safety Code
 Appropriate listings (CSFM, U.L., etc.) for common systems and materials  Fire Department Standards
 Municipal, State or Federal regulations enforced by local Fire Agencies  NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire sprinkler systems
 NFPA Standards 14 (standpipes)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 96 (smoke control)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
BPR’s staff is active with California Fire Prevention Officer’s Association, as well as local chapters of International Code Council Building Officials Organizations throughout the State of California.

Flood Zones
BPR’s staff of engineers and plans examiners have experience in providing plan reviews for projects located in FEMA designated flood zones and areas prone to flooding. BPR Consulting Group’s staff has provided numerous plan reviews for projects located in flood zones using FEMA’s Technical Bulletins as well as locally adopted ordinances. Additionally, members of our team have participated in state-sponsored committees to establish guideline and building code requirements for projects planned in areas designated as flood zones.

OSHPD 2, 3 & 5
BPR Consulting Group’s staff of plans examiners and building inspectors have extensive experience providing plan review and inspection services for OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 projects. Our staff is well versed with the OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 requirements included in the California Building Code. Our inspection staff has recent experience providing inspection services for hemodialysis, outpatient surgery, hyperbolic chamber, medical clinics and acute psychiatric facilities.

On-Site Consultant Services & Meeting Attendance
Our plan review staff is available for pre-construction or pre-design meetings, field visits, contacts with the
design team, and support for field inspection personnel as needed. We understand, fully grasp, and utilize the
efficiency afforded by the many electronic meeting
platforms that have become available in recent years.

We find electronic meeting platforms such as Microsoft

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Teams, Zoom, and others allow for efficient and constructive communication between parties located throughout the United States and are an efficient tool for resolution of challenging issues both during plan review and field inspections. Our staff is available to meet with the City, project applicants and their design teams either in person or via electronic platform to resolve plan review issues efficiently and collaboratively.

Standard Plan Review Completion Timeframes
We complete all plan reviews within the timeframes shown below for both commercial and residential projects as our standard business practice. We will accommodate any turnaround schedule agreed to with our clients.

We can provide expedited plan review services when requested.

Electronic Document Review
BPR’s staff are thoroughly experienced providing electronic plan review and will perform electronic plan reviews as requested by the City using a format that is acceptable to the City. BPR will comply with the City’s established policies and procedures for electronic plan reviews. BPR maintains an efficient cloud-based, electronic-document, submittal system for receiving and sending large electronic document files. Our electronic document portal utilizes a ShareFile system to allow permit applicants and client staff the ability to upload construction documents for our plan review services. We are also able to use Dropbox to share and collaborate with the City.

BPR has provided electronic plan review services, serving building departments and other public agencies with efficient electronic plan review services. We are prepared to provide electronic plan check services for your community utilizing our Bluebeam electronic plan review system, or any electronic plan review system presently used by your department. We have had the opportunity to work with many different electronic plan review systems and Bluebeam is our preferred system. Its industry-leading software is used by many jurisdictions, design teams and contractors to review and annotate construction documents. We have worked with multiple clients to purchase and deploy Bluebeam software, develop jurisdiction-specific stamps, develop Project Type
Maximum Turn-Around Time
(Business Days)
Initial Submittal Recheck Reviews
Residential (Single Family)
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel 10 5
Non-Residential
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel, Tenant Improvement 10 5
Large, Complex Commercial,
Industrial or Residential Multi-Family
Apartment Projects
10 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
tools to increase efficiencies for electronic plan reviews, and participate and provide ongoing training on the use of the software.

Transporting Plans
For paper submittal documents, if needed we will arrange for all pick-up and delivery of the plan review documents from your office at no additional cost. We utilize specific methods for project document pick-up and delivery with the goal of providing same-day service.

Communicating Plan Review Results
Plan review comments, when necessary, will be
type written and refer to specific details, drawing
or supporting document, and reference
applicable code sections. BPR will provide a clear,
concise, and thorough plan review letter itemized
by specific discipline such as life safety,
accessibility, structural, plumbing, mechanical,
etc., that can be utilized by clients, designers,
contractors, and owners to understand the noted
deficiencies and make necessary corrections to
the project documents. At the completion of each plan review cycle, BPR Consulting Group will return a copy of the plan review comment list to the designated applicant and project representative. If requested, we will coordinate plan review re-checks directly with the designated project applicant. Upon completion of the plan review process, we will return completed plan review documents, in either hard copy or electronic format as needed, bearing BPR’s plan review stamps and ready for final approval and permit issuance by the jurisdiction.

As requested, BPR will provide the City with monthly plan review status reports for all projects assigned.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 4

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
BPR Consulting Group was founded by a group of experienced veterans of the building safety industry with the sole focus of providing thorough and efficient building and fire plan review, inspection and other building and fire department services on behalf of California communities. Our leadership team has worked together for nearly 20 years and collectively possesses more than 100 years of experience providing building safety services to cities, counties, state agencies and other municipal agencies throughout California and the western United States. Our focus is to support California Building and Fire Departments in a professional manner by providing efficient, timely and professional building safety services for the communities we serve. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services and presently provide building and fire plan review and inspection services similar to those being requested, to multiple Southern California Building Departments. We are also experienced in providing plan review and inspection services for high profile and unique projects. We have worked with numerous public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

The team proposed to serve the City of La Mesa has extensive knowledge of California Building and Fire Codes and consists of the following: ICC-certified plans examiners, building and fire inspectors, fire marshal, building officials, plans examiners, permit technicians, and highly experienced administrative personnel. California licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers; and Certified Access Specialist (CASP) professionals.

Building and fire department services we provide to municipalities and agencies include:
 Building safety plan review services
 Building inspection services
 CASP plan review and inspection services
 Building Department management services
 Fire prevention plan review and inspection services
 Permit Technician and support services
 Building Official services
 Civil plan review and inspection services
On the following pages you see our team’s experience providing the same services as being requested by the City. Our team has a proven track record of providing efficient and predictable building and fire department services in support of California communities. Our key objectives in providing these services in support of the City of La Mesa are as follows:
 To provide timely and responsive plan review services. Our well qualified and professionally licensed team of plans examiners will provide you with efficient and timely building and fire plan review services including clear communication of plan review results. We will work with you to tailor our services to align with your unique and specific community needs.
 To be responsive to your specific staffing needs. As construction and development activity fluctuates within your community, we will adjust our service levels to maintain seamless service to your customers.  To provide staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge. We will utilize appropriately experienced and qualified staff to perform all identified services.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

ORGANIZATION CHART
The Organization Chart below provides an overview of the staff available to serve the City of La Mesa. BPR will not be utilizing any sub-consultants to perform the requested services.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

KEY PERSONNEL
Below you will find brief bios of the management team that will oversee and manage the delivery of all services to the City. We have identified Ron Beehler as Principal-in-Charge. Ron will serve as your primary contact throughout the RFP process, will manage all contract and billing issues and will be the individual authorized to negotiate and execute the Consultant Services Agreement with the City. Mark Berg will serve as Project Manager and will be your primary representative throughout the term of the contract and will manage the successful delivery of services.

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Ron is licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. He utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building department plan review services, including building department plan review services for high-profile projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. Ron’s experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large multi-building projects and unique fast paced development projects. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. Years of Experience: 35 Mark Berg, CBO, MCP, ICC PROJECT MANAGER
Mark is an ICC Certified Fire Code Official, Fire Marshal, Building Official, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and Master Code Professional with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and fire reviews in residential, multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review of all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing and performing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mark also possesses exceptional skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building. Years of Experience: 31

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

BRIEF BIOGRAPHIES
All of our staff maintain appropriate certifications or professional licenses for the services they provide. We encourage our staff to continually obtain additional certifications and support ongoing training and education for our staff. Our focus is to maintain the highest and best qualified building and fire department support staff in the industry. BPR’s staff has a proven track record of providing high quality and timely services on behalf of the public agencies we serve. BPR has the necessary resources available to immediately provide all the proposed services to the City of La Mesa. Complete resumes have been provided in the Appendix of this proposal. Licenses and certifications held by our proposed team are provided immediately following the biographies.

Bill Rodgers, SE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW / PLAN REVIEW MANAGER Bill is a California licensed civil and structural engineer with over 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including over 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. Bill has worked closely with Building Departments across the State of California, including many years serving Southern California communities, and has assisted government agencies with numerous projects of varying size and type. His wealth of experience includes managing plan review services for all building types throughout California and Nevada on behalf of public agency clients and performing structural plan review for commercial, industrial, and residential projects. Years of Experience: 30
Roger Peterson, SE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Roger is a California licensed civil and Structural Engineer, and an experienced building safety professional with 35 years of experience in structural design and building plan review. Roger has designed and provided plan review services for single and multi-story steel, and concrete-framed buildings, as well as structures utilizing timber, and masonry framing systems. Roger’s experience includes plan review of numerous high-profile and fast paced multi-story building projects for multiple public agency clients including management of inspection programs for these same types of projects. Roger utilizes his detailed code knowledge, extensive design experience and on-site construction project experience to ensure accurate, thorough, and timely plan review and inspection services on behalf of municipal client agencies. Years of Experience: 35 Elena Hartsough, SE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Elena is a dedicated structural engineer with over 18 years of experience designing structures, from small home renovations to large warehouse spaces and custom homes. Elena’s strengths include experience with multiple building materials including wood, light-gage, masonry, steel and concrete; knowledge of the California Building Code and proficiency in relevant software programs including Enercalc, SAP2000, L-Pile and AutoCAD.

Years of Experience: 18
Joseph Leonard, SE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Joseph has 20 years of experience as a consultant structural engineerforlight framed construction, including single family dwellings, commercial buildings, and public schools, throughout California. He also has 10 years of working as a consultant structural engineer on heavy, low to mid-rise building structures, for public and military use. Clients included NAVFAC, NASA, the Navy, and the Army Corp of Engineers, and various public-school districts in the

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
California. Joseph also has multiple years experience examining construction documents for compliance with the California Building Code and other adopted coded for California Building Departments. Years of Experience: 30 Kyle Hansen, PE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Kyle is a California Licensed Civil Engineer with relevant experience providing plan review services to support multiple California public agencies to ensure compliance withall relevant and applicable building codes, ordinances and requirements. Kyle offers incredible attention to detail and an admirable focus on customer service. Years of Experience: 6
Chandra Desai, PE STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Chandra is a California Licensed Civil Engineer with over 35 years of experience in structural engineering, which includes the design of structures for residential, commercial, and industrial facilities. He has over 16 years of experience providing plan review, permit processing and field issue resolution for all types of buildings. Years of Experience: 35
Denise Reese, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Denise is an ICC Certified Chief Building Official and Life Safety Plans Examiner. She has experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural reviews of residential, multifamily and commercial projects, including OSHPD-3 licensed facilities. This valuable experience is also evident in that Denise specializes in working with applicants, designers and jurisdictions, having successfully served multiple California communities. Years of Experience: 15
David Castillo, ME, FPE PLAN REVIEW
David brings more than 35 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers. David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review on Central Treatment Centers, Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities, Inpatient Mental Health Clinics, and Inmate Housing Units for the Department of Corrections. He has engineered and designed Acute Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings. Years of Experience: 36
Thomas Trimberger, ME, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Thomas has more than 30 years of experience working within building departments both successfully providing and supervising virtually all building department functions. Thomas is a CA Registered Mechanical Engineer, ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector. His extensive experience and knowledge enables him to provide excellent services to our clients. Thomas is skilled at developing relationships with developers, designers and the community to ensure plan reviews, inspections and development review functions are performed in an effective and efficient manner. He continuously assists clients by providing guidance and education on the construction and inspection process. Always helpful, personable, professional and successful in delivering a high level of customer service. Years of Experience: 30

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Jingpei Zhang, EE, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Jingpei is a licensed electrical engineer in California and has over 30 years of experience. He holds a master’s degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. His extensive experience in designing a variety of facilities and systems lends to his ability to provide excellent plan review services. His experience includes the design of electrical distribution systems for healthcare centers, data centers, commercial and industrial building and educational facilities. Years of Experience: 30
Jerry Schreiber, EE, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Jerry has more than 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical Inspector. Jerome’s experience is wide and varied, having provided engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies. Years of Experience: 40 Rick Maddox, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. While working for Clark County Building Department, Richard represented his department for multiple years at all electrical industry events such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums. Years of Experience: 27
Kevin Brenton, CBO, CASP, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Kevin is a California Certified Building Official, a CASP professional, certified plans examiner, and Commercial Combination Building Inspector with over 24 years in the construction and inspection industry combined. He is an active local chapter member of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and active member in the local chapter of International Code Council. Years of Experience: 24 Sharon Vanderpool, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Sharon is a proficient building plans examiner with over seven years of experience with residential construction projects and permitting. She is well-versed in the design and plan review process, municipal submittal requirements, and building permit procurement. Years of Experience: 7 Tammie Rikard, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Tammie has 30 years of experience in municipal government, performing a wide range of functions in Community Development; Building and Planning Divisions. Her education, certifications and experience provide her with a well-rounded and broad- based capability to deliver excellent customer service in all capacities of permit center management, building code administration, plan review and field inspection within a development services department. Years of Experience: 30

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Andrew Burke, CASP, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist, CASP, and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California Building Codes. His CASP certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, helps him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field. Years of Experience: 10 Rick Mauldin, CASP, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Rick is a skilled CASP certified Plans Examiner and Inspector for major multi-discipline and multi-level building projects, known for providing inclusive plan examinations and support to fellow co-workers and various jurisdictional building staff. As a Building Official, Senior Plans Examiner and Senior Inspector, Rick has 37 + years of management, inspection, contracting, building inspection, and building code compliance review experience, including experience with both a city agency and the private sector. Years of Experience: 37 Nathan Saracino, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Nathan has over 15 years of experience in the construction / building industry with a strong proven knowledge of Federal, State, and local laws, codes and ordinances as they relate to building construction. He is fully versed in the accepted safety standards, testing procedures and methods of construction. He possesses the ability to read and interpret various codes and to apply good judgment in the enforcement of such. Nathan’s hands on experience in the construction field coupled with his knowledge and experience in building inspection and plan review make him and asset to any project he is assigned. He possesses a strong work ethic, proactive problem-solving approach and is a valuable team player. Years of Experience: 15
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
For the past 20 years Tim has provided building safety services on behalf of California communities. Tim has served in the capacity of Deputy Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector on behalf of multiple California communities. His experience as a Deputy Building Official exposed him to the many facets of managing a Building Department and allowed him to develop the exceptional organizational and management skills necessary to provide superior services to the communities he serves. Tim’s experience includes plan review and inspection for all types and sizes of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, institutional, and industrial projects. He is familiar with multiple permit tracking software systems utilized by jurisdictions and has managed all facets of building department services. Tim currently utilizes his skills as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector to benefit California communities. Years of Experience: 22

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Melissa Vink, CSFM FIRE PLAN REVIEW
Melissa is a results-driven professional with over 15 years of experience in the fire service, including seven years as a hospital-based fire inspector. She was appointed as a Designated Campus Fire Marshal from the California State Fire Marshal’s Office and is highly efficient in performing fire inspection and plan review services for a wide variety of clients and project types. Years of Experience: 15 Russell Blair, ICC FIRE PLAN REVIEW
He brings more than 40 years of experience as a career member of the fire service. He has managed and participated in a wide range of projects including plan review, inspection, hazard analysis, fire investigation, fire suppression, hazardous materials response, emergency medical services, policy development, and curriculum development. Russ is a four-time graduate of the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Maryland, specializing in the Fire Prevention Management Curriculum. He currently provides fire protection plan review services to Building and Fire Departments throughout California. Years of Experience: 40 Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
For over 30 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator serving multiple California communities. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities.

He currently serves as an Inspection Manager and Building Official, supervising plan review, inspection and clerical staff ensuring a high level of customer services and technical excellence for assigned California based clients and projects. Years of Experience: 31
Rick Walters, CASP, LEED, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Rick has over numerous years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the building inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official, building inspector and is CASP certified. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures. Years of Experience: 33 Don Ctibor, PE, QSD CIVIL PLAN REVIEW
Don is a highly experienced Licensed California Professional Engineer with extensive project experience and management experience. Specific skills include budget strategy, preparation and oversight and implementation of best practices across multiple departments. Knowledgeable in enforcing compliance and minimum standards to safeguard life, limb, health property and public welfare. Don has successfully provided project management expertise for many California clients. Years of Experience: 16

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Below you will find the extensive licenses and certifications that our proposed staff hold.

Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO,
ICC
Principal-in-Charge
Sr. Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CABO Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Building Inspector
C39404
S3632
CE019992
SE019992
1492
801789
801789
801789
801789
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
---
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
Mark Berg, ICC
ICC Master Code
Professional
Project Manager
ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Fire Code Official
ICC Certified Fire Marshal
ICC Combination Dwelling Inspector - Uniform Codes
ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Fire Code Specialist
ICC Fire Codes and Standards
ICC Fire Inspector I
ICC Fire Inspector II
ICC Fire Plans Examiner
ICC Master Code Professional
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Permit Specialist
ICC Permit Technician
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
12/11/2025
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/28/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
04/27/2023
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/05/2024
07/14/2024
10/03/2024
10/02/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
12/11/2025
04/08/2024
Bill Rodgers, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Structural Plan Review
Plan Review Manager
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
S4198
C50673
CE18427
SE18427
09/30/2023
09/30/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
Roger Peterson, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Structural Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
ID Registered Professional Civil Engineer
ID Registered Professional Structural Engineer
C46096
S3846
C8225
S8225
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
06/30/2024
06/30/2024
Elena Hartsough, SE
Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
C67675
S5538
06/30/2025

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Structural Plan Review
Joseph Leonard, PE,

SE, PRE
CA Registered Structural Engineer
CA Registered Civil Engineer
SE-5880
CE-73026
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
Kyle Hansen, PE
Civil Engineer
Structural Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer CE91071 03/31/2024 Chandra Desai, PE
Civil Engineer
Structural Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer C47213 12/31/2023 Denise Reese, CBO,
ICC
Non-Structural Plan
Review
ICC CALGreen Inspector
ICC California Building Plans Examiner
ICC Permit Technician
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Permit Specialist
8096275
8096275
8096275
8096275
8096275
04/23/2025
04/23/2025
04/23/2025
04/23/2025
04/23/2025
David Castillo, ME/FPE
Mechanical, Plumbing
and Fire Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer
CA Registered Fire Protection Engineer
M31455
FP2013
12/31/2024
03/31/2026
Tom Trimberger, ME,
ICC
Mechanical, Plumbing
and Electrical Plan
Review
CA Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Mechanical Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Code Official
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Plumbing Code Official
ICC Plumbing Code Specialist
ICC Mechanical Code Specialist
26359
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
866408
06/30/2023
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
12/20/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
05/16/2025
Jingpei Zhang, EE
Electrical Engineer
Electrical Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
NCCER HVAC Level IV Certification
NCCER Plumbing Level IV Certification
NCCER Building Maintenance Level III Certification
NCCER Carpentry Level IV Certification
NCCER Solar Photovoltaic Level I Certification
NCCER Wind Power Level I Certification
NCCER Green Technology Level I Certification
NCCER Weatherization Technician Level I
Certification
EE16243 12/31/2024
Jerry Schreiber, EE
Electrical Engineer
Electrical Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
HI Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
EE12290
EE13259
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
09/30/2024
n/a
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
07/27/2024

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
879275
879275
07/27/2024
07/27/2024
Rick Maddox, ICC
Electrical
Plan Review
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Master Electrician (NV)
ATC 20 Post Disaster Training
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
000-001221
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
---
Kevin Brenton, ICC,
CASP
Non-Structural Plan
Review
ICC Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Commercial Electrical Inspector
ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Combination Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Management Module
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
Certified Access Specialist (CASP)
Licensed General Contractor
Journeyman Electrician, 2002
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
8259529
CASP-964
B-88891
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
12/23/2024
10/10/2023
04/11/2025
04/11/2025
08/04/2024
Sharon Vanderpool,
ICC
Fire & Life Safety Plan
Review
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Plumbing Plans Examiner
8789037
8789037
8789037
8789037
07/03/2025
07/03/2025
07/03/2025
07/03/2025
Tammie Rikard, ICC
Fire & Life Safety Plan
Review
ICC Building Inspector 5104615 10/26/2024
Andrew Burke, CASP,
ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Fire & Life Safety Plan
Review
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Permit Technician
CASP-710
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
08/12/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
Rick Mauldin, CASP,
ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Non-Structural Plan
Review
Commercial Mechanical Inspector
Combination Inspector
Residential Mechanical Inspector
Commercial Electrical Inspector
California Combination Inspector
Commercial Plumbing Inspector
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Residential Electrical Inspector
Building Plans Examiner
California Commercial Building Inspector
Electrical Inspector
Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner
California Commercial Plumbing Inspector
California Residential Electrical Inspector
Commercial Building Inspector
Mechanical Inspector
California Residential Building Inspector
California Residential Plumbing Inspector
Plumbing Inspector
California Commercial Mechanical Inspector
Residential Plumbing Inspector
California Building Plans Examiner
California Residential Mechanical Inspector
Building Inspector
Residential Building Inspector
California Commercial Electrical Inspector
California Commercial Combination Inspector
California Residential Combination Inspector
Residential Combination Inspector
Commercial Combination Inspector
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
1064528
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
Nathan Saracino, ICC
Non-Structural Plan
Review
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
CA General Contractor, Class B
9518768
9518768
9518768
9518768
9518768
9518768
B881390
10/26/2026
03/26/2026
08/18/2026
10/15/2023
12/2/2024
12/3/2024
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC
Non-Structural Plan
Review
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist B8
ICC California Building Plans Examiner I6
ICC California Residential Combination Inspector J5
ICC California Residential Inspector J1
ICC California Residential Electrical Inspector J2
ICC California Residential Plumbing Inspector J3
ICC California Residential Mechanical Inspector J4
ICC California Commercial Building Inspector I1
ICC California Commercial Plumbing Inspector I3
ICC California Commercial Mechanical Inspector I4
ICC Accessibility Inspector / Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Inspector P5
ICC Building Inspector B5
ICC Building Inspector UBC
ICC Mechanical Inspector M5
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Building Plans Examiner B3
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Melissa Vink
Fire Plan Review
CSFM Plans Examiner 1A, 1B, 1C
CSFM Fire Inspector 1
Hazardous Materials First Responder
Fire Alarm Plan Review
Fire Prevention 3B
Fire Inspector 1A, 1B, 1C
Fire Inspector 2A, 2B, 2C
Russell Blair, ICC
Fire Plan Review
ICC Fire Plans Examiner
CA Certified Firefighter, 1986, 011770
CA Fire Prevention 1A, 1990
CA Fire Prevention 1B, 1993
CA Fire Prevention 1C, 1992
CA Fire Prevention 2A, 2003
CA Fire Prevention 2B, 2006
CA Fire Prevention 3A, 2001
CA Fire Prevention 3B, 2000
CA Fire Investigation 1A, 1997
CA Fire Investigation 1A, 1997
CA Fire Investigation 1B, 1995
CA Fire Instructor 1A, 2007
CA Fire Instructor 1B, 2007
Hazardous Materials 1A, 1987
Hazardous Materials 1B, 1987
CA Hazardous Materials 1C, 1987
CA Hazardous Materials 1D, 1987
Emergency Medical Technical, County of Sacramento,
D2828
8092477 09/01/2023
Don Ctibor, PE, QSD
Civil Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Engineer
CA Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD)
ERA RRP Certification (NAT-F115845 & R139176)
General Engineering Contractor
General Building Contractor
DSA Engineer of Record
76392
24244
744754
744754
12/31/2024
Rick Walters, CASP,

LEED, CBO, ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Inspection
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
CASP-439
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
08/02/2024
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Commercial Combination Inspector
CA LEED Certified LEED AP BD+C
IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector
IAPMO Certified Mechanical Inspector
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
10436985
030666
090146
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
---
---
---

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS / COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
BPR’s staff is encouraged and supported to be involved in the communities in which they work. In addition to community events, our team is highly active in a variety of industry organizations throughout the state including California Building Officials, local ICC Chapters, Structural Engineers Association, County Building Officials Association of CA, CA Fire Prevention Officers Association, and others. BPR’s staff members have developed and presented training classes on behalf of many of these professional organizations on building and fire code related topics. BPR’s proposed Project Manager, Mark Berg, and proposed Principle-in-Charge, Ron Beehler, have recently presented multiple training classes on behalf of CALBO on 2022 CBC Chapter 10 requirements for building structures and due to positive feedback from class attendees both Ron and Mark are slated to present the same training classes for the next two CALBO EdWeek events.

STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING
All of our staff maintain appropriate certifications or professional licenses for the services they provide. We encourage our staff to continually obtain additional certifications and support ongoing training and education for our staff. We ensure our staff is properly trained and require ongoing training for our staff equal or greater that that required by California Health and Safety Code Section 18949.29. Many opportunities for continuing education for building safety professionals are offered by multiple providers throughout the state and hosted by a variety of providers including California Building Officials, local ICC Chapters, AIA, City Building Officials Association of CA, and others. In addition to participating in these opportunities, BPR’s staff members have developed and presented training classes on behalf of many of these professional organizations on building code related topics including:
• Means of Egress in the 2022 CBC
• CBC Requirements for Wood Framed
Building Design
• CBC Requirements for Horizontal
Diaphragm and Shear-Wall Design
• Structural and Non-Structural CRC
Requirements
• Overview of Wind Load Changes to the CBC
• CRC Wall Bracing Requirements
• Load Path Systems for Building Structures
• Structural Welding and Bolting
• Overview of CPC and CMC Requirements
for Building Systems
• Anchorage of Nonstructural Building
Components Per ASCE-7
• Simplified Structural Design
• Plan Check 1 and 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
BPR’s proposed Principal-in-Charge, Ron Beehler, has authored the well-received monthly Code Quiz for over eight years for multiple ICC Chapters. The Code Quiz has become an education component of monthly ICC Chapter meetings throughout California. BPR is now the sponsor of the Code Quiz and uses the quiz as an internal training element for our staff. The monthly Code Quiz is available at this link: https://bprgrp.com/code-quiz.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 5

COST SCHEDULE
PLAN REVIEW SERVICES: For complete plan review services for building projects reviewed in either hard copy of electronic format we propose utilizing the hourly billing rates included in the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below for the specific labor classification utilized.

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
The rates displayed in the schedule below reflect BPR’s current hourly billing rates.

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
Licensed Plan Review Engineer (structural, civil, electrical, mechanical).....................................$145 ICC Certified Plans Examiner ............................................................................................................. 120 CASp Plans Examiner or Inspector ....................................................................................................125 Fire Protection Engineer....................................................................................................................145 ICC Fire Plans Examiner ..................................................................................................................... 120

Permit Technician* .....................................................................................................................65 to 75 Permit Technician Trainee/ Building Department Support Staff.......................................................45 * Based on qualifications and certifications of proposed staff.  Shipping: There is no charge for courier or shipping services for plan reviews conducted off site.  Expedited Plan Reviews: Expedited plan reviews can be provided upon request. Fees for expedited plan review services will be 145% of the above noted hourly rates.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Section 6

REFERENCES & PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Over the past 20 years, BPR’s Principals have worked hard to develop a reputation within California for providing top quality, timely, and efficient building safety services in a professional, courteous manner, always in our clients’ best interests by honoring our commitment to provide timely superior services. We believe our best advertisement is references from current and previous clients and we encourage you to contact our client references.

City of Gardena | Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director 1700 West 162nd Street, Gardena, CA 90247 | 310.217.9526 | [email protected] Services Provided:
• In-house and out-sourced plan review, building inspection, Building Official and permit technician services.

City of Arroyo Grande | Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director 1375 Ash Street, Arroyo Grande, CA, 93420 | 805.473.5466 | [email protected] Services Provided:
• Out-sourced plan review, building inspection, Building Official and permit technician services.

City of Ontario | James Caro, Building Official
303 East B Street, Ontario, CA 91764 | 909.395.2172 | [email protected] Services Provided:
• Out-sourced plan review and permit technician services on behalf of the City’s building department.

Williams Fire Protection Authority | Jeff Gilbert, Fire Chief 810 E Street, Williams, CA 95987 | 530.473.2269 | [email protected] Services Provided:
• Out-sourced fire plan review and fire inspection services on behalf of the Williams Fire Protection Authority.

Arbuckle-College City Fire Protection District | Casey Cox, Fire Chief 506 Lucas Street, Arbuckle, CA 95912 | 530.476.2231 | [email protected] Services Provided:
• Out-sourced fire plan review and fire inspection services on behalf of the ArbuckleCollege City Fire Protection District.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

PROJECT SUMMARIES
Seamlessly integrating municipal service professionals in support of public agencies is BPR Consulting Group’s sole purpose and the basis on which we were founded. BPR’s staff have extensive experience providing the same services as being requested by the City of La Mesa to communities of comparable size throughout California. Our focus is to support California Building and Fire Departments in a professional manner allowing our clients the ability to provide efficient, timely and professional building safety services for their communities.

We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services in support of Building and Fire Departments, including building and fire plan check services. We have worked with public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

CITY OF GARDENA
Crenshaw 5-Story Apartment Complex:

BPR’s staff provided complete building department plan review services for this new 5-story, 203,055 SF apartment complex which sits atop a 3-story podium. The mixed-use podium structure is Type I-A construction and fully fire sprinklered and the apartment units above the podium are Type III-A construction and also fully fire sprinklered.

This is the first use of podium style construction within the City of Gardena.

Industrial Warehouse with MEPS:

BPR’s staff provided building department plan review services for The OMP Gardena Industrial Center project consisting of a new 190,860 S.F., one story office warehouse building and warehouse, along with associated site improvements. The proposed building will be of Type IIIB Constructions with Groups S-1 and B Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls and detention pond.

Senior and Aquatics Center:

BPR’s provided complete plan review services for the City of Gardena’s new Senior and Aquatics Center Building which consists of a two-story building for the senior center, a single-story pool equipment building, and new outdoor pools. This was a high-profile project for the community, and it was important that our plan review services were comprehensive and timely. The proposed buildings will be of Type VB Construction with Groups A-3, B and S-1 Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
of travel, signage, BBQ and picnic area, trash enclosure and perimeter fencing.

CITY OF ONTARIO
New Fire Station Building:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for a new Fire Station Building in the City of Ontario. This mixed occupancy building included Occupancy Type B (4,432 S.F.), Type S2 (14,112 S.F.), and Type R-2 (9,291 S.F.) for a total area of 27,835 square feet. This two-story, sprinklered building utilized Type V-B Construction and included staff living quarters, office functions and apparatus bays.

Raising Cane Restaurant:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for this new fast service restaurant located in the City of Ontario. This fully fire sprinklered 3,449 S.F. building is Occupancy Group A-2 with Type V-B Construction. This fully accessible building included exterior site improvements, a dining area, sales counter, restrooms, storage areas, and commercial kitchen with grease hood, fire suppression system, and make up air units.

New Multi Family Complex:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for this new 48-unit multi-family apartment complex located in the City of Ontario. This project consisted of four two-story, sprinklered buildings with stucco exteriors and concrete tile roofing. The buildings structural systems utilized platform framing with prefabricated roof and floor trusses, panelized horizontal floor and roof diaphragms, with wood shear walls. The buildings were of Occupancy Group R2 and utilized Type V-B Construction with a total area of 12,690 S.F per building.

Emporia Place:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for phase one of this new multi-phased residential complex. Phase one included the construction of two, three-level, residential buildings of Occupancy Group R-2 and one community building of Occupancy Group A-3. The new three-level residential buildings utilized Type V-A Construction and were fully fire sprinklered with a total building area of 58,698 S.F. The 1,921 S.F. Community Building utilized Type V-B Construction. The building’s structural systems utilized platform framing with prefabricated roof and floor trusses, panelized horizontal floor and roof diaphragms, with wood shear walls. All buildings included stucco exteriors with lap siding accents and concrete tile roofing.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
Costco Warehouse & Fuel Station:

BPR’s staff provided building department plan review services on behalf of the City of Monterey Park for the new Costco Warehouse and Fuel Station project. Plan review services included plan review of the non-structural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, green and energy efficiency improvements associated with the project. The 154,974 SF tilt-up warehouse building utilized Type VB Construction. The fueling station utilized Type ll-B Construction.

The building was classified as a Group M Occupancy.

Pacific Plaza Mixed-Use Hotel and Condominium:

BPR’s staff members provided complete building plan review services for the Pacific Plaza Monterey Park project which was designed as a mixed-use project to include Hotel, Condominium and Restaurant uses. The project includes 398,792 SF within five levels above two levels of underground parking. The project utilized Construction Type I-A at the two lower parking levels and Construction Type III-A above the 2nd level. The building includes Occupancy Groups A-2, A-3, M, B and S-2.

CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Walmart Remodel:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services of the remodel of a 125,440 S.F. Walmart Store. The project is Type IIB Construction with Occupancy Groups M, B and R and is fully fire sprinklered. The remodel consisted of new exterior signage, upgraded interior finishes, installation of new racks and fixtures in both the stock room and on the sales floor, remodel and upgrade of existing restrooms, a new modular kitchen, installation of new coolers, installing new doors in the existing walls and upgrading the accessibility features on the site which included new truncated domes, restriping ADA parking and paths of travel and adding ADA signage.

Modelhōm Furniture + Design:

BPR provided complete plan review services for this 4,000-sf commercial tenant improvement. This remodel included
adding new metal siding and roofing, new windows and
doors as well as new signage. There were upgrades to the exterior wall studs and insulation, attic space insulation, and interior drywall. There was also the addition to a 728-sf mezzanine. The project included a bathroom remodel to
accommodate handicapped requirements and revised
lighting. Exterior improvements included parking lot restriping and the widening of walkways.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova:

The Logisticenter project consists of a new 155,076 S.F., one story shell building and associated site improvements. The proposed building will be of Type IIIB Constructions with Groups S-1 and B Occupancies and will be fully fire
sprinklered. The construction of the building consists of a hybrid roof system constructed of plywood sheathing
supported by wood sub-purlins which are supported by steel open-webbed truss joists and girders. The roof structure is supported by concrete walls at the perimeter of the building and steel columns at the interior of the building.

The wall system consists of concrete “tilt-up” wall panels. The lateral force resisting system will consist of concrete shear walls at the perimeter of the building and a concentric steel braced frame at the interior of the building. The building is supported on continuous footings at the concrete perimeter walls and pad footings at the interior columns. The floor consists of a concrete slab-on-grade.

Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls and detention pond.

BPR Consulting Group is providing complete building department plan review services for this project including review of the site improvements and the accessibility review of the site.

CITY OF CLEARLAKE
Oak Valley Villas Apartments:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building
department plan review services for the 80-unit apartment complex. The apartment complex consists of three 19,379 sf, three story apartment buildings, one 19930 sf, three story apartment building, one 6,803 sf, two story apartment building and a 3,498 sf single story community building. The three-story apartment buildings consist of Type VA
Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The two-story apartment consisted of Type VB Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The Community Building consists of Type VB Construction with B and A-3 Occupancies. All buildings are fully fire sprinklered. The apartment buildings contain (20) one-bedroom units, (36) two-bedroom units, (18) three-bedroom units and (6) four-bedroom units.

The buildings are constructed of typical wood framed construction with manufactured floor and roof trusses being supported by wood stud bearing walls. The foundation system consists of continuous spread and isolated footings with a concrete slab on grade at the ground level. The lateral force resisting system consists of light frame wood walls sheathed with wood structural shear panels. The exterior finish consists of a combination of stucco, cementitious board & batten siding, and cementitious clapboard siding. BPR’s staff provided complete plan review services for this project on behalf of the City of Clearlake.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR

COUNTY OF MADERA
Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center 2:

BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center. These two projects consisted of a new 25,314 S.F. single story warehouse building with a 1,813 S.F. mezzanine. The structure is Type II-B Construction with Occupancy Groups S-1 and B and is fully fire sprinklered. The building is constructed of structural steel framing, supporting steel roof decking. The roof structure is supported by steel bents and steel columns.

The lateral force resisting system consists of steel moment frames and steel cross-bracing. The exterior walls consist of a combination of steel siding, stucco and stone veneer. The foundation for the structure consists of continuous footing at the perimeter of the building and typical spread pad footings at all columns and frames with a concrete slab-on-grade. The mezzanine is a steel framed self-supporting structure with a composite concrete over steel deck system. The lateral force resisting system for the mezzanine consists of steel braced frames.

Site improvements include Landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls, electrical transformer, backup generator and landscaping.

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Marriott Residence Inn:

The Marriott Residence Inn project consists of the plan review of a new 84,576 S.F., five story hotel building and associated site improvements. The proposed building is Type IIIA
Constructions with Groups R-1, B and A-2 Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. The construction of the building consists of pre-manufactured wood roof trusses and
manufactured wood I-joists supported by wood framed bearing walls. The structure is supported on convention continuous and pad footings with a concrete slab-on-grade at the ground level. The lateral force resisting system consists of light framed wood walls sheathed with wood structural panels. The building houses offices, meeting room, dining room, buffet area, living room, front desk, bar, laundry room, mechanical and electrical rooms, a fitness area and guest rooms at the first floor level. The second through fifth floors contain guest rooms. Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, concrete ramps, concrete sidewalks, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls and an outdoor pool. BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for this project including review of the site improvements and the accessibility review of the site.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Westgate / Carefield Senior Living Facility:

The Westgate Assisted Living Facility project consists of the plan review of a new 105,724 S.F., two story assisted living facility and associated site improvements. The proposed building is Type VA Constructions with Groups R-2.1, A-2, A-3 and B Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. The construction of the building consists of pre-manufactured wood roof trusses and
manufactured wood I-joists supported by wood framed bearing walls. The structure is supported on a 10” thick post-tensioned mat slab at the ground level. The lateral force resisting system consists of light framed wood walls sheathed with wood structural panels. The building houses offices, lobby area, bistro, multi-purpose room, library, lounge, exercise studio, kitchen, beauty parlor, clinics, dining areas, games / activity areas, laundry room, memory care, mechanical and electrical rooms and resident’s rooms at the first-floor level. The second floor contains resident’s rooms. Site improvements include landscaping, an outdoor courtyard, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, concrete sidewalks and walking paths, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures and fencing. BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for this project including review of the site improvements and the accessibility review of the site.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

CITY OF LA MESA | RFP 23-20

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE BPR
Appendix
• TEAM RESUMES

DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Graduate Coursework in Structural &
Geotechnical Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico
 AA, Physical Science, Butte College,
Oroville, CA

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3632
 CA Civil Engineer CE-39404
 NV Structural Engineer
SE-019992
 NV Civil Engineer CE-019992
 National Earthquake Hazard
Reduction Program Training
 CA Construction Law Training
International Code Council - 801789
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Building Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 San Joaquin ICC Chapter of Building
Officials – Past President
 Napa Solano ICC Chapter – Past
President
 Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials – Multiple Term
Board of Directors Member
 CALBO Building and Fire Advisory
Committee – Appointed Member
 CALBO Structural Committee –
Appointed Member

RON BEEHLER, SE, CBO

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Ron utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility, and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building departments, building department services and high-profile building projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. His experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large, multi-building projects and unique, fast-paced development projects. Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. He has also provided building department assessments on behalf of municipal clients to identify inefficiencies and implement best practice improvements.

Licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Code Specialist, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).

Ron is dedicated to maintaining his knowledge of California building codes, laws and regulations related to building department operations. He frequently lectures and presents classes on technical topics on behalf of professional organizations including CALBO and multiple International Code Council Chapters throughout California and other western states.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Director of Operations | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Ron manages client plan review and inspection services on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Director, Building Safety Services | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Ron provided direct oversight of all Building Safety Services including coordination of all plan review and building inspection services, ensuring timely and responsive services. He worked with building officials for fullservice clients to insure timely and efficient services. Ron also managed and provided direct oversight of plan review and inspection services for large, complicated and fast-paced projects on behalf of public agency clients.

Chief Building Official | City of Sacramento | 2003 – 2006 Ron planned, directed, and managed activities for a 120-person building department with oversight responsibilities for construction inspections and plan review of 18,000 permitted projects annually. He planned, organized,

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO – Principal-in-Charge
BPR
administered, and evaluated staff work. Other duties included report writing and presentations to community groups, city council and professional organizations, and planning and administering a budget of $13.6 million.

Supervising Engineer | Building Inspection Division | City of Sacramento | 2002 – 2003 Ron supervised plan review, managed plan intake and public counter functions for two regional permit centers, trained and mentored staff, met with architects and engineers to resolve building code related issues, coordinated plan review for high profile projects, and worked with field inspection supervisors and inspectors.

Regional Compliance Officer, Senior Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1998 – 2002
Ron supervised regional hospital inspection program coordinating field inspection staff and approval of special inspection issues. He resolved complicated code related inspection issues, and reviewed plans, specifications, and structural calculations for healthcare facilities. Ron consulted with architects and engineers to resolve complex code interpretation issues. He researched and investigated structural adequacy of building materials and manufactured products, and verified proper loads, forces, and materials for the design of buildings and equipment anchorage.

Chief of Facilities Engineering | California National Guard | 1991 – 1998 Ron supervised and planned work for engineering design and project inspection staff, developed scope and budgets for projects, directed preparation of plans from preliminary design through working drawings, coordinated and approved project specifications and cost estimates, negotiated and approved project changes, coordinated inspection activities, resolved inspection disputes, represented National Guard/Military Department at public meetings, conducted plan review for projects designed by consultants, and presented design concepts and final designs.

Associate Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1987 – 1991
Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications for new hospitals and skilled nursing facilities for California Building Code and UBC requirements, met with architects and engineers to resolve plan review issues, reviewed field changes, investigated, and resolved construction conflicts and other administrative duties.

Associate Engineer Architect | Sacramento County Building Department | 1983 – 1987 Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications, and structural calculations for building code compliance, reviewed plans for residential, multi-residential, commercial, and industrial structures, and met with designers to resolve code issues related to commercial and residential structures.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Public Administration, Minor in
English, California Baptist University
 AA, Construction Technology,
Riverside Community College
 AA, Physical Education, Riverside
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council - 859362
 Master Code Professional
 ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans
Examiner
 ICC Building Code Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Certified Fire Code Official
 ICC Certified Fire Marshal
 ICC Combination Dwelling
Inspector - Uniform Codes
 ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
 ICC Electrical Inspector
 ICC Fire Code Specialist
 ICC Fire Codes and Standards
 ICC Fire Inspector I
 ICC Fire Inspector II
 ICC Fire Plans Examiner
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Permit Specialist
 ICC Permit Technician
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Residential Combination
Inspector
 ICC Residential Energy
Inspector/Plans Examiner
 ICC Residential Plans Examiner

MARK BERG, CBO, MCP, ICC
PROJECT MANAGER | NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Mark is an ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and Master Code Professional with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural reviews in residential, multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review of all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mark also possesses exceptional skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | BPR
Consulting Group | 2021-Present
Performing comprehensive plan review and inspection services for client agencies. Reviews residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, Life Safety, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy and Green Standards, local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2017-2021
Performed comprehensive plan review and inspection services for residential and commercial projects for client agencies. Projects included residential, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial projects consisting of tenant improvements and new buildings.

Building Official | City of Redlands | 2015-2017
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various Technical or legal aspects of programs. Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements.

Building Inspection Supervisor | City of Rancho Cucamonga | 2010-2015
Supervised and trained building inspection staff, developed inspection related policies and guidelines for the department, conflict resolution and code interpretations.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

MARK BERG, CBO, ICC – Project Manager / Non-Structural Plan Review BPR
Building Official | City of Norco | 2006-2011
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various technical or legal aspects of programs.

Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements. Investigated violations of building construction codes and determined necessity for issuance of legal complaints.

Building Division Manager | County of Riverside | 2001-2006 Handled difficult public relations problems, directs investigations of complaint or problems, and recommends resolutions. Assisted in arranging and conducting classroom and on-the-job training sessions for the technical personnel and counter staff. Supervised the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development process.

Plans Examiner-Sr. Building Inspector | City of Temecula | 1991-2001 Oversee the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development review process.

Provided code interpretations and developed technical documents. Performed the most complex building code compliance plan reviews.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 CALBO – Damage Assessment Committee, State Building Codes Committee  CACEO – California Association of Code Enforcement Officers  CEC – California Energy Commission
 ICC – Administrative Committee
 NFPA – National Fire Prevention Association, Building Systems Committee  IAPMO – Code Interpretation Committees for UPC, UMC
 JAEI – Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections
 City of Riverside Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Sacramento

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-4198
 CA Civil Engineer CE-50673
 NV Structural Engineer SE-18427
 NV Civil Engineer CE-18427

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Structural Engineers Association,
Northern California (SEAONC)

BILL RODGERS, SE
STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW | PLAN REVIEW MANAGER
Bill has more than 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including more than 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. His wealth of experience includes a varied and vast list of projects throughout California and Nevada. Bill is in demand for handson work within jurisdictions due to his great success in blending excellent engineering skills with responsive customer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Bill directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer |Plans Examiner | Interwest
Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada. In addition to providing structural plan review services, he was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. Bill’s duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | LP2A / Bureau Veritas | 2001 - 2006 Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada Structural Engineer| Associate | DES Architects + Engineers | 1995 – 2001 Bill was responsible for the structural design of many projects throughout the Bay Area, including Pacific Shores Center in Redwood City, Moffett Corners in Sunnyvale, Carlmont High School in Belmont, and many other projects. Additionally, Bill oversaw the structural department of this architecture and engineering firm, and was responsible for staff development and work quality.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Judicial Council of California | State of California | 2010 – 2021
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new court buildings and court building upgrades throughout California. Most recently he provided services for the new Sonora courthouse, the new courthouse in Modesto, and the new eighteen-story high-rise Sacramento Criminal Courthouse.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Division of State Architect | State of California | 2016 – 2021
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new school buildings and school upgrades throughout California. Recent projects include Westmore Oaks Elementary School, Santa Maria High School and El Camino College District, New Behavioral Health and Social Science Building.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Bill Rodgers, SE – Structural Plan Review / Plan Review Manager BPR
Project Manager/Structural Engineer | University of California, Merced | 2020 Campus Expansion | 2017 – 2021
Bill ensured all plan reviews were completed within the agreed upon timeframes by leading weekly conference calls with the plan review and onsite team and regularly visiting the project site. Additionally, Bill provided structural plan review services for this expansive project.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | City of Berkeley | Berkeley, CA | 2008 – 2021 Bill ensured all plan review services for the City of Berkeley were accurate and completed in a timely manner.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Downtown Commons Tower | Sacramento, CA | 2016 – 2019
Bill served as the project manager for the plan review of this new 634,357 gross SF, 16-story, mixed-use tower located adjacent to the new Sacramento Kings Arena. The tower included office space for the team and area management, a 250-room hotel, 44-residential units and below grade parking.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
Wyoming

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3846
 CA Civil Engineer CE-46096
 ID Structural Engineer SE-8225
 ID Civil Engineer CE-8225
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 Structural Engineers Association of
Northern California (SEAONC)

ROGER PETERSON, SE

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
With more than 34 years of experience in structural design and plan review, Roger brings considerable depth and knowledge to any project. Roger is a California Registered Structural and Civil Engineer who has designed and provided plan review services for multi-story steel and concrete-framed buildings, as well as one-story structures utilizing steel, concrete, timber, and masonry framing systems. His design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. Roger's expertise contributes to the success and safety of all projects.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Roger directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer | Project Manager | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Roger provided management for several of Interwest’s offices and special projects as well as performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California. In addition to providing structural plan review services, Roger was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. His duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | Plans Examiner | Branch Manager LP2A | Bureau Veritas | CA | 1999 - 2006
Roger served as branch manager and lead structural plan reviewer for the Sacramento Area branch office. He was responsible for the production and performance of office including maintaining client relationships. His duties included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial and residential projects.

Project Engineer | Power Engineers, Inc. | 1999
Roger was a project design engineer for commercial and industrial-type projects. He provided structural design and construction administration services.

Project Engineer | Office Manager | R2H Engineering, Inc. | 1998 - 1999 Roger was the office manager and project design engineer responsible for the structural design of commercial projects.

Project Engineer | Rutherford & Chekene | 1995 - 1998
Roger was responsible for providing design and detailing for commercial and industrial type projects, including numerous projects in the micro-chip industry.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Roger Peterson, SE – Structural Plan Review
BPR
Design Engineer | Project Engineer | DES Engineers & Architects | 1997 - 1995 Roger provided engineering design and detailing for commercial, institutional, corporate and residential building projects using wood, steel, concrete and masonry building materials.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Hollywood Park | Inglewood, CA | 2018 – 2021 Roger provided plan review services for this new, mixed-use development which included retail and office space with associated parking encompassing 28.5 acres.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Nasa Ames Research Center | Moffett Field, CA | 2018 Roger provided structural plan review and project management of this 1.2 million square-foot development comprised of office, research, and development space.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Monterey Park Hotel & Residence | Monterey Park, CA | 2017 – 2021
Roger provided plan review services and project management for this new, mixed-use hotel, condominium, and restaurant podium type building.

Project Manager |Structural Engineer | Hatchet Ridge Wind Farm | Shasta County, CA | 2009 - 2010
Roger provided project management, structural plan review and field inspections for this 101.2 MW power generating facility that consists of 44 – 2.3 MW wind turbines constructed along 9 miles of the ridge line on Hatchet Ridge near Burney, CA.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Architectural Engineering,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-5538
 CA Civil Engineer CE-67675

ELENA HARTSOUGH, SE

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Elena is a dedicated structural engineer with over 18 years of experience which includes the design and structural review of structures ranging from small home renovations to large warehouse spaces and custom homes.

Elena’s strengths include experience with multiple building materials including wood, light-gage, masonry, steel and concrete; knowledge of the California Building Code and proficiency in relevant software programs including Enercalc, SAP2000, L-Pile and AutoCAD.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Structural Engineer / Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Elena provides structural and non-structural plan review for residential, industrial and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Structural Engineer / Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2014-2022 Elena reviewed residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, and International building standards; state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Senior Engineer | Department of Water Resources | 2009 – 2014 Elena managed a staff of five, providing resource management and project coordination within the Division of Engineering. She prepared and reviewed preliminary engineering reports, technical memos, and project plans, details, and specifications. She also designed warehouse structure with light-gage wall framing and steel truss roof framing.

Project Engineer / Project Manager | Harris & Sloan Consulting Group | 2003 - 2009 Elena took projects from the schematic design phase through the construction document phase and was point of contact during construction administration. She designed wood-framed residential and commercial structures, researched structural insulated panel (SIP) construction and utilized them in design of structures.

Project Designer | Jon Brody Consulting Group | 2001 - 2003 Elena designed and detailed gravity and lateral systems for new and re-modeled structures utilizing wood, steel, light-gage, and concrete. She

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, Emphasis on
Structures, California State
University, Chico. 1997-2003.
 Civil Engineering Courses, Cal Poly
San Luis Obispo. 1995-1997.

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-5880
 CA Civil Engineer CE-73026

JOSEPH LEONARD, PE, SE

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Joseph has 20 years consultant structural engineering of light framed construction, including single family dwellings, commercial buildings, and public schools, throughout California.He also has 10 years of working as a consultant structural engineering on heavy, low to mid-rise building structures, for public and military use. These clients included NAVFAC, NASA, the Navy, and the Army Corp of Engineers, and various public-school districts in the Southern California area. Joseph also has 2 years examining construction documents for compliance with Parts 1-10, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for and as adopted by, various local Building Departments.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Structural Engineer & Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2023 - Present
Joseph provides structural engineering services and plan review for BPR Consulting Group. This includes review for residential, industrial and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Principal Structural Engineer | Joseph Leonard Structural Engineering (JLSE) | 2017 - 2023 Joseph founded Joseph Leonard’s, Structural Engineering (JLSE), specializing in Architectural Engineering and Plan Review for primarily single-family residential structures.

Plan Review Engineer | Coastland Civil Engineering (CCE) | 2015 – 2017 Joseph provided plan reviews of all types of projects, including all aspects of building design, and client management. Reviewedconstruction documents for compliance with all of Title 24, including all aspects of building design. More specifically, review included occupancy, allowable building heights/area/stories, construction type, egress and exit paths, access (Chapters 11A and 11B), site access, fire and smoke-rated construction requirements, Wildland-Urban Interface, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, green, and energy, as well as structural (Building Plan Check, Title 24 Parts 1 – 10)).

He also provided review of residential and commercial construction documents for AHJ’s in the North Bay Area and the local area, including everything from single family dwellings to villages. More specifically, the projects included SFD’s, hotels, apartments, townhomes, villages, and senior living facilities.

A partial list ofthese projects:
 Managed the contract and plan review/inspection team for the County of Amador and the City of Ione, to provide building department services. CCE provided both plan review, and inspection services to both authorities.
 Acquired and managed a contract with the Division of the State Architect (DSA) to provide Structural Plan Review services for public school projects, throughout California.  Earned Continuing Education units, by attending numerous seminars through SVABO, with topics ranging from Electrical to Access (11A and 11B).

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Joseph Leonard, PE, SE – Structural Plan Review
BPR
Senior Structural Engineer | Stedman and Dyson Structural Engineers | 2008 – 2015 Consultantfor structural engineering design services for all types of low to mid-rise structures, structural plan review for the Division of the State Architect (DSA), structural peer review for various UC projects, and Seismic Evaluations of existing buildings and bridges (utilizing ASCE 31 and 41). Joseph also worked on structural design including several schools, a shoot-house, rifle range, church and monastery, planetarium, and parking lot. These clients included NAVFAC, NASA, the Navy, and the Army Corp of Engineers, and various public-school districts in the Southern California area.

Design Engineer | SMR-ISD | 2008 – 2008
Joseph consulted structural engineering design, of ‘heavy’ structures (steel, concrete, and masonry), and forensics engineering.

Structural Designer | Various Design Firms | 2004 – 2008 Joseph consulted structural engineering of light framed structures, ranging from room additions to new large commercial retail structures, including custom and tract SFDs.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering,
California State University, Chico
Graduated Magna Cum Laude
 Yuba Community College
Lower Division Engineering &
General Education

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Civil Engineer CE-91071
 Engineer-in-Training (EIT)

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Structural Engineers Association of
California (SEAOC)
 American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
 Mathematics, Engineering and
Science Achievement (MESA)
 Honors Societies
o Phi Kappa Phi – Top 5%
o Golden Key National Honors
Society – Top 15%
KYLE M. HANSEN, PE

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Kyle is a California Licensed Civil Engineerwith relevant experience providing plan review services to California public agencies to ensure compliance will all relevant and applicable building codes, ordinances and requirements.

Kyle offers incredible attentionto detail and an admirable focus oncustomer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Structural Plans Examiner / Plan Review Engineer
| BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Kyle provides structural plan review for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Structural Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2016 - 2022 Kyle supported Northern California public agency clients by reviewing building plans and related documents for compliance with Building Codes, policies, and jurisdiction requirements for commercial and residential buildings. Projects included new residential, commercial, tenant improvement, and remodel projects. Kyle assisted homeowners, designers, and contractors by providing information and interpretations of building codes and regulations, recommended necessary changes to design documents as required to obtain compliance with applicable codes and regulations.Kyle was responsible for preparing written correction letters and maintaining and updating records and database information.

Academic Support | Department of Civil Engineering, CSU Chico | 2013 - 2015
Kyle provided academic support to students by completing daily paperwork to include grading fluid mechanics papers, laboratories, and data entry. He was responsible for tracking student progress and Kyle attendedweekly and monthly department meetings.

Academic Support | Yuba Community College | 2011 - 2015 Kyle provided students with drop-in mathematics support including Calculus (I, II, III), Physics, and Engineering (Statics, Materials).

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 MS, Civil / Structural Engineering,
University of Illinois

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Civil Engineer CE-47213
International Code Council
 ICC Building Plans Examiner

CHANDRA DESAI, PE

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Chandra is a California Licensed Civil Engineer with over 35 years of experience in structural engineering, which includes the design of structures for residential, commercial and industrial facilities. He has over 16 years of experience providing plan review, permit processing and field issue resolution for all types of buildings.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Structural Plans Examiner / Plan Review Engineer | BPR
Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Chandra provides structural and non-structural plan review for residential, industrial and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plan Check Engineer | Consulting Firm | 2015 – 2022
Responsibilities included plan review for residential, industrial, commercial and miscellaneous structures for structural code compliance. Chandra worked with multiple city and county clients along with outside engineers, architects and Building Departments to coordinate and resolve plan review related issues, expedite permit processing and address field related challenges.

Plan Check Engineer | County of Riverside | 1999 – 2015 Responsibilities included plan review for residential, industrial, commercial and miscellaneous structures for both engineering and non-engineering items. Chandra worked with outside engineers, architects and other consultants to coordinate and resolve plan review related issues in order to expedite permit processing and field problem resolution. Chandra assisted Junior Engineers, Inspectors and front counter staff to resolve any code related issues.

Principal Engineer | Parsons Corp. | 1980-1983 / 1987-1999 Responsibilities included design of steel and concrete structures for Petro-Chemical Plants, Gas Plants and industrial facilities. Prepared and checked structural design calculations, cost estimates and construction drawings. Extensive use of in-house computer programs and other structural programs in preparing calculations and drawings. Chandra supervised 4-6 Junior Engineers and CAD Operators in producing construction documents. He prepared cost estimates and man-hour estimates for future and ongoing projects.

Senior Engineer | Sargent and Lundy | 1983 - 1987
Work included the design of steel and concrete structures for nuclear power plant buildings. Chandra prepared structural calculations for reinforced concrete and steel structures for reactor buildings and auxiliary buildings per NRC requirements. Chandra worked on the job site for two years to resolve construction problems and coordinate field activities.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Consumnes River College,
Building Inspection Technology

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council - 8096275
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Certified CALGreen Inspector
 ICC Certified Permit Technician
 ICC Permit Specialist

DENISE REESE, CBO, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Denise is an ICC Certified Chief Building Official and Life Safety Plans Examiner.

She has experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and minimal structural reviews in residential, multifamily and commercial projects, including OSHPD-3 licensed facilities. This valuable experience is also evident in that Denise specializes in working with applicants, designers and jurisdictions, and successfully serving multiple client jurisdictions.

Denise approaches plan review with her unique knowledge balancing the delivery of timely and accurate reviews while remaining responsive and approachable. Denise is extremely skilled in all disciplines required to successfully bring projects to approval.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Life Safety Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Denise provides comprehensive plan review and inspection services for California client agencies. She performs detailed reviews of residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, CalGreen, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy Standards, state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances. Denise supervises life safety plans examiners and the permit intake team. She also provides training to new plans examiners.

Building Official & Supervising Life Safety Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2014-2022 Denise performed comprehensive plan review and inspection services for client agencies. Reviewed residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, CalGreen, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy Standards, state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances. Supervised life safety plans examiners and permit intake team. Provided training to new plan reviewers.

Building Permit Technician II | City of Rancho Cordova | 2010 – 2014 Denise Interpreted and explained policies and regulations accurately and tactfully to the public assisting with the completion of building permit applications. She performed preliminary plan review for completeness and accuracy and to determine appropriate fees.

Customer Service Specialist | City of Rancho Cordova | 2007 - 2010 Denise provided customer and administrative support to the Building & Safety Division as well as other departments throughout City Hall.

Administrative Secretary | City of Rancho Cordova | 2006 - 2007 Provided administrative support to the City Manager’s office, his Executive Assistant and the City Council.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BSME, California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
 Credentialed Instructor, Los Rios
Community College District
Campuses: Cosumnes River College,
Folsom Lake College, & Sacramento
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Registered Mechanical Engineer,
31455
 CA Registered Fire Protection
Engineer, 2013
 Certificate Fire Protection
Engineering | University of California
Davis Extension
 Certificate in HVAC and Refrigeration
| University of California Davis
Extension
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating & Air Conditioning
Engineers
 American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
 National Fire Protection Association
 American Society of Plumbing
Engineers

DAVID CASTILLO, ME, FPE

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
David brings more than 30 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers.

David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review on Central Treatment Centers, Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities, Inpatient Mental Health Clinics, and Inmate Housing Units for the Department of Corrections. He has engineered and designed Acute Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Plan Review Engineer | BPR Consulting Group |
2021 – Present
David performs mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for BRP’s California clients.

Senior Plan Review Engineer | Consulting Group | 2012 - 2021
David performed mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for Interwest’s California clients.

Senior Mechanical Engineer | State of California, OSHPD Group | 2001 - 2012
David performed plan checking of mechanical systems for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and surgery centers to ensure code compliance with the CBC, CMC, CPC and NFPA.

Vice President | Technical Engineering Group, Inc. | 2000 - 2001 David responsibilities included acquiring new clients, maintaining existing clients and preparing proposals. He performed heating and cooling load calculations, laid out mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems and variable air volume systems for hospitals, prisons, and educational facilities. David performed in-house plan check of all projects, and served as the Engineer of Record for all projects. He is knowledgeable of CMC, CPC, CBC, NFPA and OSHPD.

Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Mazzetti & Associates | 1999 - 2000 David provided project management for all aspects of mechanical design on prisons, hospitals, pharmaceutical facilities, and office buildings. He was familiar with cGMP and all classes of clean rooms related to manufacturing facilities.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Dave Castillo, ME, FPE – Non-Structural Plan Review
BPR
Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Interface Engineering, Inc. / 1997 - 1999 David was the lead engineer for the Mechanical Division of a Mechanical/Electrical engineering firm. He initiated and implemented the writing of a Project Management Procedures Manual for companywide use. David performed heating and cooling load calculations, layout of mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems, variable air volume systems, and write specifications.

Mechanical Designer | Edward Rios & Associates | 1994 - 1997 David was responsible for all aspects of HVAC, process piping and plumbing design and drafting for a mechanical engineering firm. He performed heating and cooling load calculations using Trane Trace analysis software.

Mechanical Designer | The Spink Corporation | 1991 - 1994 David was responsible for all plumbing and process piping design and drafting for the Mechanical Division of a 115-person multidisciplinary engineering firm. Drafting was done using AutoCAD Release 11. David’s primary responsibilities included running HVAC loads using Trane “Load 600” analysis program, Title 24 compliance, and field work for remodel/rehabilitation projects.

Mechanical Designer / Estimator | Mark III Engineering Contractors | 1986 - 1991 David performed material takeoffs for plumbing and HVAC. He designed HVAC and plumbing for commercial projects. David priced out projects and submitted bids to general contractor. He also served as a project manager for field staff.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Bachelors of Science, Mechanical
Engineering
 California State University,
Sacramento
 Certificate in Total Quality
Management
 Lost Rios Community College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 LEED Accredited Professional
 Build It Green Certified Green
Building Professional
 Build It Green Greenpoint Rater
CA Registered Mechanical Engineer |
M026359 *Registered ME in 14 States
 CABEC Residential & Non-Residential
Certified Energy Plans Examiner
International Code Council - 866408
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Certified Mechanical Code
Official
 ICC Certified Plumbing Code Official
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Mechanical Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Plans Examiner
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials (SVABO)
 California Building Standards
Commission (CBSC)
 California Association of Building
Officials (CALBO)

THOMAS TRIMBERGER, ME, CBO, ICC

MECHANICAL ENGINEER
Thomas has more than 30 years of experience working within building departments both successfully providing and supervising virtually all building department functions. Thomas is a CA Registered Mechanical Engineer, ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector. His extensive experience and knowledge enables him to provide excellent services to our clients. Thomas is skilled at developing relationships with developers, designers and the community to ensure plan reviews, inspections and development review functions are performed in an effective and efficient manner. He continuously assists clients by providing guidance and education on the construction and inspection process. Always helpful, personable, professional and successful in delivering a high level of customer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Mechanical Engineer/Building Official | BPR Consulting Group | 2023 - Present
Thomas provides plans examination and building official services to municipal clients throughout California.

Building Official/Mechanical Engineer/Plans Examiner| Consulting Firm | 2017 – 2023
Thomas has served as the Chief Building Official for the City of Modesto for and the City of Woodland. He is responsible for both Building Safety and Code Enforcement. Additionally, Thomas works for the City of Vallejo coordinating and performing plan review. Thomas also provides comprehensive building and safety services to a variety of clients throughout the Northern California region.

Chief Building Official/Senior Mechanical Engineer/Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2016 - 2017
Thomas provided Fire and Life Safety, Accessibility, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Green Building Code review standards for both Private and Publicsector clientele.

Mechanical Engineer | California Energy Commission | 2015-2016 Thomas worked in the Existing Buildings (AB758) Program. His responsibilities included, collaborations with local governments and real estate industry personnel regarding energy use in existing buildings.

Senior Mechanical Engineer | Consulting Firm | 2010 - 2015 Thomas provided plan review services for power plants plan. Plan reviews were completed per CA Code standards for mechanical, plumbing, energy, fire and life safety as well as applicable industry standards.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Thomas Trimberger, ME, CBO, ICC – Mechanical Engineer / Plan Review BPR
Reviews were also completed for both private and public buildings and properties. Additional projects included Commercial Property Assessments.

Special Project Manager| City of Rancho Cordova | 2001 - 2010 Thomas managed special projects for the City Manager and Public Works Director, including an Energy Efficiency and Conservations Block Grant, Cemetery expansion and Police Station remodel.

Chief Building Official | County of Sacramento/City of Rancho Cordova | 2003 - 2009 Thomas was responsible for the Building Department operational management and budget. He was responsible for the establishment of the new building and safety department, overseeing all aspects of Building and Safety plan review, permit issuance, field inspections, complaints and violations, business license inspections, staffing and budgeting.

Senior Mechanical Engineer | County of Sacramento | 1999 - 2005 Thomas duties included; managing 26 inspectors including all aspects of commercial inspections, managing all plan review activities including residential, commercial and all specialists, helped institute a new automated permit system for permit issuance and tracking as well as coordinated special issues for residential staff for energy compliance and alternate means and materials.

Associate Engineer | County of Sacramento | 1987 - 1999 Thomas was responsible for determining acceptability of proposed mechanical and plumbing systems; advising building owners and designers about the design and code compliance of public potable water, sewer, and gas systems, fire resistive building protection, ventilation, and commercial kitchen exhaust and markup air systems. He supervised the mechanical plan review staff, writing technical correspondence and various other tasks.

HVAC Design Engineer | Airway Heating and Air | 1985 - 1987 Thomas was responsible for the design, estimation of HVAC systems, and technical assistance to jobsite superintendents, preparation of bids, bills of materials, major equipment purchased, issuing and managing subcontracts. Other duties included life-cycle-cost analysis, energy budget analysis, Title 24 Energy Certification and development program.

Design Engineer | Comeau Engineering | 1983 - 1985
Thomas worked in the design of industrial, commercial and residential HVAC, piping and plumbing systems. He performed site surveys concept development and design, drafting, and coordination with contractors and facility staff. Thomas also performed load calculations, residential and non-residential Title 24 energy compliance certifications.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 MS, Electrical Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento CA
 BS, Electrical Engineering, South
China University of Technology,
China

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Professional Engineer, E16243
 NCCER Plumbing Level IV
Certification
 NCCER Plumbing Level IV
Certification
 NCCER Building Maintenance Level
III Certification
 NCCER Carpentry Level IV
Certification
 NCCER Solar Photovoltaic Level I
Certification
 NCCER Wind Power Level I
Certification
 NCCER Green Technology Level I
Certification
 NCCER Weatherization Technician
Level I Certification
HONORS
 Professional Engineer Achievement
Award; Carlson Corporation, July
2000
 Student of the Year Award; South
China University of Technology,
China, 1987

JINGPEI ZHANG, EE

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Jingpei is a licensed electrical engineer in California and has over 30 years of experience. He holds a master’s degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. His extensive experience in designing a variety of facilities and systems lends to his ability to provide excellent plan review services. His experience includes the design of electrical distribution systems for healthcare centers, data centers, commercial and industrial building and educational facilities.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2023 – Present
Jingpei provided plan review services for BPR’s California clients to included residential and commercial projects. Project types include residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2011 – 2023
Jingpei provided plan review services for public agencies throughout California.

Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2009 – 2017
Jingpei designed health care facilities, commercial and industry buildings, and schools. Representative Projects included:
• Farm Credit West (bank), Yuba City
• Almadon Ranch Commercial Office Building O6/P5
• El Dorado Surgery Center, Folsom Surgery Center
• Kaiser Folsom HVAC upgrade
• San Francisco Honda Service Center in Folsom and Bayshore • University Village Shopping Center
• Folsom Broderick Restaurant
• Folsom Natural Result Surgery Center
• Sunnyvale Building T warm shell
• Twin River School District schools HVAC system Replacement Senior Electrical Engineer/Project Integration Engineer | Worley Parsons | Folsom/Sacramento, CA | 2007 – 2009
In this position, Jingpei designed and reviewed plans for power plants, including the Ivanpah Solar thermal power plant in Mojave Desert, Ca.; the Geothermal power plant grid transmission upgrade and retrofit in Imperial County; and the PG&E Gas-fired power plant planning phase, Colusa, Ca.

Senior Electrical Engineer | Mazzetti & Associates Inc. | Sacramento, CA | 2000 – 2007 Jingpei designed health care facilities, commercial and industry buildings, including:

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Jingpei Zhang, EE – Non-Structural Plan Review
BPR
• St. Joseph Hospital main office building (MOB), Eureka, CA. • North bay Medical Center:
• Medical Center Emergency Department, Vacaville, CA.
• Cardio-vascular surgery center, Fairfield, CA.
• Lakeside Hospital, Tele-medical surgery suites, Lakeport, CA. • UC Davis Briggs Hall Chemical Laboratory Building
• Franchise Tax Board Administration building, Rancho Cordova, CA. • Kaiser Hospitals, San Francisco, Vacaville, Roseville, Elk Grove. • Veteran’s Hospital Radiology Department, Mather, CA.
• Woodland Memorial Hospital, mental health department renovation, Woodland, CA. • Microsoft Data center, Redmond, Seattle, WA.
• Lockheed Martin Power distribution system upgrade, Santa Clara, CA. • CDCR Prison Housing units, Delano; Salinas; Vacaville, CA. • Elk Grove Middle school, Elk Grove, CA.
• Santa Clara Elementary School, Santa Clara, CA.
• San Jose Elementary School, San Jose, CA.

Assistant Electrical Engineer | Carlson Corporation | San Francisco, CA | 1997 – 2000 Jingpei designed and built data centers, including:
• AT&T Web hosting data center, Seattle, WA.
• Level 3 Data center, Portland, Or.
• Equinix data centers, New York, city, Chicago, IL.
• GTE call center, various sites.
• Safeco Call Center, Seattle, WA.
• Bank of America Branch offices, various sites.
• Wells Fargo Bank Branch offices, various sites.

Electrical Designer/Draftsman | Peters Engineering | Sacramento, CA | 1996 – 1997 Jingpei designed commercial/industry, residential and schools. AutoCAD drafting and design. Also, Jingpei designed power lighting fire alarm systems for various commercial, industrial, schools and office buildings.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Electrical Engineering, California
Polytechnic University

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Electrical Engineer 12290
 HI Electrical Engineer 13259
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors – Electrical
Plans Examiner and Electrical
Inspector – 6027880
International Code Council (ICC)
 ICC CA Commercial Building
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors
 IEEE

JERRY SCHREIBER, EE

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Jerome has more than 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii, and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical inspector. Jerome’s experience is wide and varied, having provided engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Inspector | City of Glendale | 2013 -Present
Jerome has served as a Building Inspector for the City of Glendale since August 2013. His duties have included Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical Inspections and Plans Examination.

Instructor | Long Beach City College | 2013 -Present
Since 2013, Jerome has served as an instructor in National Electrical Code for Industrial & Commercial Applications at Long Beach City College.

Senior Electrical Inspector | City of Vernon | 1987 -2013 Jerome was responsible for electrical plans examination and performing Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical inspections and all electrical installation in the City and for the City municipal facilities.

Electrical Consultant | BSK Engineering | 1986 -1987
Jerome served as an Electrical Consultant for a private firm that provided design for factories, restaurants, computer rooms, car lots, and other such installations.

Distribution Engineer | Southern California Edison | 1983 -1986 Jerome provided service planning and customer coordination for this Southern California utility.

Interior Electrician | Air National Guard | 1978 -1980
Jerome provided electrician services for various installations as a member of the Air National Guard.

Automatic Flight Control Systems Specialist, Sergeant | US Air Force | 1973 -1977
As a Sergeant in the US Air Force, Jerome served as Shift Supervisor and was responsible for repair crew to facilitate maintenance on transient aircraft.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Victor Valley College Inspection
Technology Certificate
 Pacesetter Schools Building
Inspections Certificate
 Gordon Copper Vocational
Technical School

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC NO. 848507:
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
 ICC Electrical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Master Electrician (NV)
000-001221
 OSHA 10 & 30 Training
 ATC 20 Post Disaster Training

RICHARD MADDOX, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. While working for Clark County, Richard represented his department for multiple years at all electrical industry events such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Electrical Plan Review  BPR Consulting Group  2021 –
Present
Richard provides electrical plan reviews for residential and commercial projects for compliance with the California Electrical Code, California Energy Code requirements as well as local codes and ordinances.

Building Inspector and Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2013-2021
Provided electrical plan review and inspections for residential and commercial buildings for compliance with California Electrical Code and Energy Code requirements, local codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Supervising Building Inspector, Electrical Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2003-2012
Supervised a staff of 15 inspectors. Assisted customers in addressing problems and concerns with compliance issues on code-related matters.

Assisted with plan checking for complex projects and conflict resolution.

Participated in budget planning, budget review and long-range planning.

Building Inspection Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2000-2003 Developed an education program for inspectors. Researched, authored and maintained the department’s electrical policies, procedures and inspection technical guidelines. Represented the department to the local utility on all electrical related issues. Represented the department at all electrical industry meetings such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW.

Senior Building Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1997-2000 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions. Assisted all customers in addressing problems and concerns on compliance issues on all code-related matters related to active permits.

Combination Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1995-1997 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 AS, Computer Science,
Carrington College

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council - 8259529
 ICC Commercial Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Building Inspector
 ICC Commercial Electrical Inspector
 ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
 ICC Commercial Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Electrical Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Commercial Combination
Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Legal Module
 ICC Building Codes and Standards
Module
 ICC Management Module
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
Certified Access Specialist - #964
Licensed General Contractor – B-88891
Journeyman Electrician, 2002
KEVIN BRENTON, CBO, CASp, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Kevin is a Certified Building Official, CASp professional, and commercial combination building inspector with over 24 years in the construction and inspection industry combined. He is an active Local Chapter member of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and active member in the local chapter of International Code Council. Kevin has a strong understanding and knowledge of the implementation of local, state and federal building codes.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Plans Examiner / Building Inspector | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Kevin provides plan review and inspection services for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Senior Plans Examiner / Inspector | Stanford University | 2019 - 2022
Kevin provided combination field inspections of new and existing building construction including, large complex commercial Structural, Accessibility, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical and Fire installations. He performed plan review and specifications for completeness, accuracy and implementation.

Kevin provided the campus with onsite CASp review and Inspection; served as the subject matter expert for building codes and accessibility; and provided a high level of customer service to all stakeholders though out the duration of projects.

Building Inspector | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 2019 - 2019
Kevin provided combination field inspections of new and existing building construction including large complex commercial Structural, Accessibility, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical and Fire installations. Kevin utilized his understanding and implementation of local, state and federal building codes to perform plan review and specifications for completeness, accuracy and implementation. He possessed and practiced his experience with DOE procedures and provided expert code evaluations of onsite construction projects.

Structural Building Inspector | Santa Clara County Planning & Development | 2017 - 2018 Kevin provided combination field inspections of new and existing buildings for both commercial and residential projects. He served as the commercial combination building inspector for Stanford University, was the lead Inspector for Stanford University Escondido Village (1.5 million sqft. Pre-cast facility) and served as Building Inspectorfor Santa Clara County correctional facilities.

Senior Building Inspector | Consulting Firm | 2012 - 2021 Kevin provided combination field inspections of new and existing building construction including but not limited to large complex commercial Structural, Accessibility, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical and Fire installations. He

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Kevin Brenton, ICC, CBO, CASp – Non-Structural Plan Review BPR
served as Senior Combination Inspector for the APPLE AC2 campus for the entire duration of project and was the Combination Building Inspector at Sandia National Laboratory. Kevin supervised up to six employees at the AC2 project for daily assignments.

Journeyman Electrician and Pipe Fitter | KRB Construction | 1999 - 2012 Kevin worked on electrical systems in an industrial and commercial environment. He Installed and modified old and new work including but not limited to lighting, outlets electrical fixtures, electrical equipment transformers, switch gear and distribution equipment. Kevin tested and maintained repairs of emergency systems, backup generators, switch gear, fans and motors. Project types included class 1 division 1 electrical systems, fire alarm systems, emergency power systems, solar arrays, and underground storage tank electrical.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Business Administration,
University of Phoenix
 Certificate / Construction
Management Technology,
Cosumnes River College

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council - 8789037
 ICC Certified Building Plans
Examiner
 ICC Certified Residential Plans
Examiner
 ICC Certified Residential Building
Inspector
 ICC Certified Plumbing Plans
Examiner

SHARON VANDERPOOL, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Sharon is proficient building plans examiner with over seven years of experience with residential construction projects and permitting. She is well-versed in the design and plan review process, municipal submittal requirements, and building permit procurement.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Sharon provides plan reviewservices for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2017 - 2022
Sharon performed plan review of residential projects for numerous municipal building departments throughout California. She provided technical review of building plans and related documents for compliance with California Building Codes, client requirements and policies. Sharon performed plan reviews of new residential, master plans, remodel, and tenant improvements. Sharon assisted applicants and project designers by providing information and interpretations of building codes and recommended assembly details as required to obtain compliance with applicable codes. Sharon was responsible for preparing written correction letters and maintaining project records.

Administrative Specialist | El Dorado Hills Community Services District | 2014 - 2015 Sharon served as lead Code Compliance Officer by ensuring that all buildings and properties followed community CC&Rs. She handled various compliance issues from homeowners and committee members through meetings/site visits/phone/email communication with tact and consideration with the goal of resolution. Sharon facilitated monthly Citizen Advisory Committee meetings including the preparation of agendas and meeting minutes. She always maintained a high level of customer service in communicating with homeowners, HOAs, and county agencies.

Building Permit Technician | Consulting Firm | 2006 - 2009 Sharon was responsible for processing all plans and documents for permit issuance for the City of Elk Grove Building Department. She reviewed and processed permit applications and plans for compliance with applicable building codes; responded to inquiries from developers, architects, and property owners by providing pertinent permit procedures and policies at the public counter, email, over the phone; and Sharon served as permit coordinator for large projects requiring multiple permit approvals

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Building Inspection Technology,
Coursework
Utah Valley State College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 Certified Evaluator, Post-Disaster
Safety Assessment Program
 InterNACHI Certified Professional
Inspector
International Code Council - 5104615
 ICC Building Inspector

TECHNOLOGY
Accela, Citizen Serve, Adobe, Blue Beam,
Microsoft Suite, Teams, Zoom

TAMMIE RIKARD, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Tammie has 30 years of experience in municipal government, performing a wide range of functions in Community Development; Building and Planning Divisions. Her education, certifications and experience provide her with a well-rounded and broad- based capability to deliver excellent customer service in all capacities of permit center management, building code administration, plan review and field inspection within a development services department.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group
2022 - Present
Tammie provides plan review services for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Building Inspector III / Plan Review | City of Sacramento 2016 - 2022
Tammie performed detailed, comprehensive technical reviews of building plans, specifications and calculations for accuracy, completeness and conformance with governing codes, state regulations and local ordinances in all aspects related to life safety, structural, accessibility, E/M/P, energy and green building standards. She prepared correction notices defining plan deficiencies.

Tammie offered effective communication with architects, engineers, contractors, designers and homeowners regarding building codes and permits; responded to inquiries and performed special investigations of complex building and construction related issues in order to develop resolutions to problems. She provided customer service, assistance and information to members of the public pertaining to building codes and regulations/ assist in resolving problems regarding plan submissions and sufficiency; and conducted Teams and Zoom meeting discussions with project stakeholders as needed to collaborate on plan review items.

Development Services Technician II / Plan Check | City of Yuba City | 1992 - 2016 Tammie performed a wide range of technical functions within the Building, Planning and Code Enforcement Divisions. She reviewed residential and commercial building plans for conformance with applicable codes, regulations and local ordinances in all aspects of building life safety, structural, accessibility, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, green building and energy conservation as well as zoning and land use. Tammie prepared detailed correction notices advising applicants of plan deficiencies; coordinated plan review process, prepared plan check correspondence and incorporated aggregation of plan review comments from all review disciplines, maintained plan review records, monitored progress and established applicable fees. She provided plan review project management; coordinated and conducted design review, pre-construction, progress and pre-final meetings with development team, anticipated foreseeable development related issues in order to facilitate preemptive resolution.

Tammie processed planning project and building permit applications and employed advancements in technology to streamline and improve processes. She produced statistical reports of development activity and advised and assisted contractors, owner/builders, architects and the general public concerning building and planning related issues.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Associates in Building Inspection
Technology, Butte Community
College
 Associates in Mathematics, Butte
Community College

CERTIFICATIONS
 Certified Access Specialist – CASp710
International Code Council, 8250398
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Permit Technician
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Plans Examiner
 ICC Residential Combination
Inspector
ANDREW BURKE, CASp, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California building codes.

His CASp certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, helps him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present
Provides life safety and accessibility plan review for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | Interwest Consulting Group|2013 – 2021
Provided life safety and accessibility plan reviews for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Building Department Intern | Town of Los Gatos | 2012
Andrew worked as an intern in various areas of a building department. Performed field inspections and worked behind the counter as a permit technician.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion | University of California, Merced | 2016 - 2021 Life Safety and Accessibility Plans Examiner | Andrew reviewed plans for the campus expansion for compliance California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy Standards, Fire Codes, Green Building Standards Code, and California Accessibility Standards; state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Sac Republic Soccer Stadium | City of Sacramento | 2019 Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided plan review for this new 409,664 SF stadium to ensure compliance with applicable accessibility codes and standards.

North 40 | Town of Las Gatos | 2018 - 2019
Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided accessibility reviews for the new 211,773 SF mixed use building in the North 40 development consisting of residential, parking garage, community room and commercial.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 AS, Building Inspection Technology,
Butte College
 AA, Drafting Technology,
Butte College


PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council - 1064528
 Commercial Mechanical Inspector
 Combination Inspector
 Residential Mechanical Inspector
 Commercial Electrical Inspector
 California Combination Inspector
 Commercial Plumbing Inspector
 Residential Electrical Inspector
 Building Plans Examiner
 CA Commercial Building Inspector
 Electrical Inspector
 Accessibility Inspector/Plans
Examiner
 CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
 CA Residential Electrical Inspector
 Commercial Building Inspector
 Mechanical Inspector
 CA Residential Building Inspector
 CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
 Plumbing Inspector
 CA Commercial Mechanical
Inspector
 Residential Plumbing Inspector
 California Building Plans Examiner
 CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
 Building Inspector
 Residential Building Inspector
 CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
 CA Commercial Combination
Inspector
 CA Residential Combination
Inspector
 Residential Combination Inspector
 Commercial Combination Inspector
 CASp / #779
RICKEY D. MAULDIN, CASp, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Mr. Rickey D. Mauldin is a skilled Plans Examiner and Inspector for major multi-discipline and multi-level building projects, known for providing inclusive plan examinations and support to fellow co-workers and various jurisdictional building staff. As a Building Official, Senior Plans Examiner and Senior Inspector, Rickey has 37 + years of management, inspection, contracting, building inspection, and building code compliance review experience, including experience with both a city agency and the private sector.

He has completed complex reviews of a variety of projects including fire stations, indoor and outdoor malls, multi-story parking structures, hotels and motels, various cellular towers, electrical distribution systems, photovoltaic systems, mechanical systems, plumbing systems, multi-level commercial establishments, various restaurants and fast food buildings, medical and dental offices, commercial swimming pools, mixed use occupancy buildings, multi-family buildings, single and multi-level single-family dwellings and site civil review for site accessibility access. Rickey is extremely organized and professional when managing several large projects and working with clients.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
 Roseville Galleria Mall, $240 million, 400,000-sq. ft. Expansion and Renovation (Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing)
 2-Story Parking Structure – Galleria Mall, Roseville, CA  5-Story Parking Structure (Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing) – Galleria Mall, Roseville, CA
 Palladio Mall Buildings – Folsom, CA
 Palladio Mall 2-Story Parking Structure – Folsom, CA
 UC Davis X-Ray Room - Folsom, CA
 4-Story Parking Structure/Mixed Use Building - Folsom, CA  Nextel Cell Site - Folsom, CA
 Bed Bath and Beyond Store - Folsom, CA
 Fresh and Easy Stores - Folsom and Lincoln, CA
 Dialysis Clinics - Folsom, Lincoln, Yuba City and Clearlake, CA  Yuba City Fire Station #4 - Yuba City, CA
 Folsom Fire Station - Folsom, CA
 Rite-Aide Pharmacy - Clearlake, CA
 Walgreens Pharmacy - Clearlake, CA
 Target Store Solar Array – Lincoln, CA
 UPS System C & D Installation, Electrical – Rancho Cordova, CA  4-Story Hotel, Townplace Suites - Roseville, CA
 4-Story Hotel, Springhill Suites - Roseville, CA
 3-Story Hotel, Hampton Inn - Yuba City, CA
 88,000 SF Mercury Insurance Tenant Improvement – Folsom, CA  LDS Church – Folsom, CA
 U-Store-It Storage Facility - Disabled Access Compliance Survey on 8 Store Locations – Sacramento Area.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Rickey D. Mauldin, CASp, ICC – Non-Structural Plan Review BPR
 Wells Fargo Building - Disabled Access Compliance Survey – Sacramento, CA  4-Story Hyatt Hotel – Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical Review – UC Davis Campus  Buena Vista ME-Wuk Indian Tribe Casino - Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical Review – Ione, CA  Orchard Village Apartment Complex - Winters, CA
 Walgreens Pharmacy - Lincoln, CA
 Placer County Correctional Facility – Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical Review  Del Norte Family Medical Clinic – Yuba City, CA
 Oroville Transit Station – Oroville, CA
 Sonic Restaurant – Oroville, CA

STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS
 City of Oroville | Building Official & Plans Examiner  Butte County Building Department | Plans Examiner
 City of Lincoln | Plans Examiner/Inspector
 City of Winters | Inspector
 Tehama County Building Department | Plans Examiner/Inspector  City of Clearlake Building Department | Inspector
 Sierra County Building Department | Plans Examiner/Inspector

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Commercial and Residential Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm Building Official, Plans Examiner and Code Official | City of Oroville Commercial and Residential Plans Examiner | Butte County Senior Plans Examiner and Senior Inspector | Consulting Firm Commercial and Residential Plans Examiner | City of Folsom Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Acting Building Official | City of Seaside Plans Examiner and Building Inspector | City of Susanville General Building and Plumbing Contractor

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Southern Regional High School
Manahawkin, NJ

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA General Contractor, Class B
B881390
International Code Council - 9518768
 ICC Residential Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Residential Electrical Inspector

NATHAN SARACINO, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Nathan has over 15 years of experience in the construction / building industry with a strong proven knowledge of Federal, State, and local laws, codes and ordinances as they relate to building construction. He is fully versed in the accepted safety standards, testing procedures and methods of construction. He possesses the ability to read and interpret various codes and to apply good judgment in the enforcement of such. Nathan’s hands on experience in the construction field coupled with his knowledge and experience in building inspection and plan review make him and asset to any project he is assigned. He possesses a strong work ethic, proactive problem-solving approach and is a valuable team player.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Inspector | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present Nathan provides building inspection services for various California municipalities. He provides inspections for code compliance and compliance with the approved construction documents for residential and commercial projects.

Building Inspector | Consulting Firm | 2021 - 2022
Nathan performed inspections of new buildings, additions, and alterations of existing buildings for compliance with the currently adopted California Building Code and related regulations. He articulated complex building issues to the public, contractors, designers, and owners, with an emphasis on building regulations pertaining to life/safety issues. Nathan identified and solved complex problems by conferring with and providing information to developers, engineers, architects, property owners, contractors, and others regarding code requirements and alternatives. Nathan fielded questions regarding building requirements; made independent analysis during the inspection process; and advised Planning, Engineering and/or Code Enforcement personnel regarding building-related issues. He provided clear and complete correction notices and inspection reports.

Nathan analyzed, interpreted, and accurately reviewed building plans, specifications and building codes. He enforced codes with good judgment and impartiality; applied technical knowledge of building trades; and performed duties within OSHA standards.

Owner/Operator | Saracino Construction | 2006 – 2019
Nathan performed a full range of tasks and duties to include client meetings; estimating the cost of materials and labor for each project; measuring architectural plans and structural details, and performing customer requests.

Nathan obtained necessary project permits,retained and managed Sub-Contractors as needed and operated dump trailer and specialty equipment for special jobs. He was responsible for saws, paint machines, nail guns, hand tools, vehicle maintenance and tool maintenance. He performed jobs in electrical, plumbing, framing, cabinetry, landscaping, dry wall, texture and painting. Held an A+ Rating with Yelp.com.

Framing Foreman/Superintendent | JTS Communities | 2004 – 2006 Under general supervision, Nathan assisted framing superintendent in day-to-day framing activities; helped establish daily priorities to ensure all buildings were framed to the plan, on budget, on schedule and delivered to the JTS Construction schedule. He was also responsible for ensuring buildings met quality assurance and framing inspections. Nathan was responsible for labor personnel, forklift operators, framers, all quality assurance, pre-sheer and pre-frame inspections, and all discrepancies on the job.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 Consumnes River College – Building
Inspection Technology
 Yuba College – Course work in
Pesticide Applications

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council 5087217
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist B8
 ICC California Building Plans
Examiner I6
 ICC California Residential
Combination Inspector J5
 ICC California Residential Inspector
J1
 ICC California Residential Electrical
Inspector J2
 ICC California Residential Plumbing
Inspector J3
 ICC California Residential
Mechanical Inspector J4
 ICC California Commercial Building
Inspector I1
 ICC California Commercial Plumbing
Inspector I3
 ICC California Commercial
Mechanical Inspector I4
 ICC Accessibility Inspector / Plans
Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector P5
 ICC Building Inspector B5
 ICC Building Inspector UBC
 ICC Mechanical Inspector M5
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Building Plans Examiner B3
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
For the past 20 years Tim as provided building safety services on behalf of Northern California communities. Tim served as theDeputy Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector for the City of Davis, City of Elk Grove and the County of Sacramento. His experience as a Deputy Building Official exposed him to the many facets of managing a Building Department and allowed him to develop the exceptional organizational and management skills necessary to provide superior services to the communities he serves.

Tim’s experience includes plan review and inspection for all types and sizes of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, institutional, and industrial projects. He is familiar with multiple permit tracking software systems utilized by jurisdictions and has managed all facets of building department services. Tim currently utilizes his skills as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector to benefit Northern California communities.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Official / Plans Examiner / Building Inspector  BPR Consulting Group  2021 – Present
Tim provides Building Official, plan review and inspection services to Cities and Counties throughout Northern California. Tim’s responsibilities also include meeting with clients to ensure that expectations are being met and maintaining client relationships.

Assistant Chief Building Official / Sr. Plans Examiner  City of Davis  2008 – 2019
Tim’s role included management ofthe City of Davis’s Building Department, supervising inspection and plan review staff. Tim over-saw the plan review department to ensure that plan reviews were being completed in a timely and consistent manner. Tim also coordinated plan reviews performed by outside consultants and provided quality control of the consultants reviews.

Assistant Building Official / Sr. Plans Examiner Consultant / City of Elk Grove2003 – 2008
Tim worked in the City of Elk Grove on a contract basis. Tim’s duties included assisting with management of the City’s Building Department including management of the City’s plan review department to ensure quality and consistency of the plan reviews. Tim began working in the City of Elk Grove early in the City’s formation and was instrumental in establishing policies and procedures for the City’s new Building Department.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Tim Scott, CBO, ICC – Non-Structural Plan Review
BPR
Plans Examiner / Building Inspector County of Sacramento  2000 – 2003 Tim provided plan reviews and building inspection services for the County of Sacramento Building Department. Tim was responsible for a range of projects from small residential remodels to large complex commercial and industrial projects.

General Building Contractor Self Employed  1993 – 2000 As a self-employed general contractor Tim was responsible for coordination of all activities associated with a small business including client relations and managing all phases of construction for wood framed residential and commercial projects.

Carpenter / Foreman  Timberline Builders  1983 - 1993 Tim began working for Timberline Builders as a carpenter and worked his way up to the position of foreman where he supervised a crew of carpenters. Tim was responsible for quality assurance as well as the productivity of the crew.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Supervising Plan Examiner / Assistant Building Official  City of Elk Grove  2003 - 2008 As the Assistant Building Official and Supervising Plans Examiner Tim was instrumental in developing and implementing policies and procedures in the development of the City of Elk Grove’s Building Department.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 AS, Paralegal Studies
MTI College
 AS, General Studies
Cuyamaca College

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS

AND CERTIFICATIONS
 CSFM Plans Examiner 1A, 1B, 1C
 CSFM Fire Inspector 1
 Hazardous Materials First
Responder
 Fire Alarm Plan Review
 Fire Prevention 3B
 Fire Inspector 1A, 1B, 1C
 Fire Inspector 2A, 2B, 2C
Melissa Vink, CSFM

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Melissa is a results driven professional with over 15 years of experience in the fire service, including seven years as a hospital-based fire inspector. She was appointed as a Designated Campus Fire Marshal from the California State Fire Marshal’s Office and is highly efficient in performing fire inspection and plan review services for a wide variety of clients and project types.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Fire Inspector / Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2022 - Present
Melissa performs fire inspection and fire plan review services for various municipal clients. Reviews commercial and residential buildings to ensure compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances. Reviews plans and specifications for building construction projects to ensure compliance with applicable codes and ordinances as well as calculations for fire alarm and extinguishing systems.

Fire Inspector / Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2021 - 2022 Responsibilities included performing visual inspections of fire components in new construction and tenant improvements; reviewing new construction plans and tenant improvement plans to ensure compliance with local, state and federal fire and life safety laws; and writing detailed plan review and inspection reports for clients. Melissa performed fire alarm and fire sprinkler inspections along with other required inspections on new construction and tenant improvements. MELISSA worked closely with various agencies to ensure inspections and plan review submittals were completed in an efficient and timely manner and conducted research of various codes and statutes to ensure proper enforcement of fire and life safety compliance. Responsibilities also included attending pre-construction meetings for various jurisdictions to establish expectations for fire and life safety inspections during construction.

Fire Inspector II / Designated Campus Fire Marshal (DCFM) | UC Davis Health Fire Marshal’s Office | 2016 - 2021
As Fire Inspector II / DCFM, Melissa performed monthly, quarterly and annual existing building inspections for fire and life safety code compliance. This included the hospital as well as outlying clinics, office buildings and warehouses. Melissa managed the fire extinguisher inspection and maintenance program. She also wrote and submitted for Hospital Administration approval, fire safety policies and procedures for the Health System based on research conducted from the California Fire Code, Title 19 and Health and Safety Codes; once approved, policies were implemented on the UCDH Fire Prevention website as well as the UC Davis Health Policy and Procedures website. Created, facilitated, integrated and maintained 300+ fire and evacuation plans in accordance with current California Fire Code, Health and Safety Code and Title 19, as well as Joint Commission and CMS requirements. Melissa assisted in scheduling and performing annual kitchen hood testing, annual fire

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Melissa Vink - Non-Structural Plan Review
BPR
alarm testing and quarterly/semi-annual fire sprinkler testing. Assisted with review of new construction and tenant improvement plans for fire and life safety code compliance in non-OSHPD regulated facilities. Managed the fire drill program for the hospital, outpatient clinics, and no-patient office buildings. Conducted fire drills on a quarterly and annual basis. Assisted with staff training of emergency Paraslydes, which included: product research, creation of the Paraslyde training manual and staff hands-on training. Melissa also responded to evacuation/relocation emergencies within the hospital and other medical center facilities as needed. She also researched and conducted audience appropriate fire safety training sessions for up to 300 employees and wrote detailed inspection and plan review reports.

Fire Inspector 1 | UC Davis Health Fire Prevention Department | 2014 - 2016 As Fire Inspector I, Melissa Organized and prepared detailed inspection reports for the Joint Commission and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) audits. She served as Public Education Coordinator for the Fire Prevention department, including fire extinguisher training and emergency evacuation training. As the designated Safety Coordinator, created the fire prevention departmental safety plan which was used as the policy for emergencies within the Fire Prevention office. She created and approved permits, and performed inspections for each, for hazardous materials, special event and hot works requests. Melissa assisted with fire alarm, smoke control and fire sprinkler testing, weekly hospital rounds inspections, monthly kitchen hood inspections, monthly and annual building inspections, wet/dry standpipe inspections, FDC visual inspections and audio-visual device testing. She also managed the fire extinguisher program which included cataloging the number and type of each fire extinguisher and researching the California Fire Code and National Fire Protection Association standards for proper size and type of extinguisher in all UCDH buildings.

Administrative Assistant III | UC Davis Health Fire Prevention Department | 2010 - 2014 In this role, Melissa streamlined the fire inspection and maintenance programs which contributed to increasing the annual inspection and maintenance of fire extinguishers from 2K to 6500 within 12 months. Responsibilities included collecting, organizing and reviewing all weekly & monthly payroll sheets and backup documents; hiring, training and supervising the department's temporary office assistant; assisting in department-wide organizational transition, and obtaining, analyzing and auditing monthly and annual reporting of expenses and account status per university policies. Melissa assisted in the organization of inspection and testing binders for the Joint Commission as well as attended several successful Joint Commission surveys for fire and life safety compliance.

Administrative Assistant II | UC Davis Health Fire Prevention Department | 2007 - 2010 Melissa collected and compiled data for monthly, quarterly and annual reports for the UC Davis Medical Center as well as the State Fire Marshal’s Office; logged all inspections in the company database, including findings, results and inspection date; and managed office personnel calendars and coordinated all inspections, fire drills and departmental meetings. In the role she also assisted with monthly inspections of fire extinguishers within the hospital and various medical center facilities.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Certified Firefighter, 1986, 011770
 CA Fire Prevention 1A, 1990
 CA Fire Prevention 1B, 1993
 CA Fire Prevention 1C, 1992
 CA Fire Prevention 2A, 2003
 CA Fire Prevention 2B, 2006
 CA Fire Prevention 3A, 2001
 CA Fire Prevention 3B, 2000
 CA Fire Investigation 1A, 1997
 CA Fire Investigation 1A, 1997
 CA Fire Investigation 1B, 1995
 CA Fire Instructor 1A, 2007
 CA Fire Instructor 1B, 2007
 Hazardous Materials 1A, 1987
 Hazardous Materials 1B, 1987
 CA Hazardous Materials 1C, 1987
 CA Hazardous Materials 1D, 1987
 Emergency Medical Technical,
County of Sacramento, D2828
International Code Council – 8092477
 ICC Fire Plans Examiner

RUSSELL BLAIR, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Russ is a Fire and Life Safety plans examiner with more than 40 years of experience within the fire protection and life safety service as a career member of the fire service. He has managed and participated in a wide range of projects including plan review, inspections, hazard analysis, fire investigation, fire suppression, hazardous materials response, emergency medical services, policy development, and curriculum development.

Russ participated in the development and implementation of one of the first accredited Fire Inspector Academies in California. He has also instructed at the California Regional Fire Academy, specifically on the subject of fire protection systems and fire alarm systems.

Russ is a four-time graduate of the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Maryland, where he specialized in the Fire Prevention Management Curriculum. The courses included Management of Fire Prevention Programs; Code Management: A Systems Approach; Fire Service Communications; and Interpersonal Dynamics.

Additionally, Russ previously served as a Fire Services Representative on the California State Fire Marshal’s Automatic Extinguishing System Advisory Committee. He has also served on the Planning Commission for the City of Citrus Heights.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Fire Plans Examiner | BPR Consulting Group | 2022-Present As a Fire Plans Examiner, Russ reviews plans and their specifications for code compliance and safety for numerous construction projects in California.

Fire Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2012 – 2022
Review plans and specifications for building construction projects to ensure compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances.

Fire and Life Safety Consultant | Self Employed | 2009 – 2014 Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District | 1994 – 2014
Pomona Fire Department | 1990 – 1994
Northrop Fire Department | 1983 – 1990
SAF Fire Department | 1978 - 1982

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Business and General
Management, San Francisco State
University
 AA, Business Administration, College
of San Mateo
 Coursework, Electrical Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council 8005399
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector

MARK MEYERS, CBO, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
For 25 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator for the City and County of Madera and the City of Clovis. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities. He recently servedas an Inspection Manager, supervising inspection and clerical staff, for the UC Merced 2020 Project, helping to design and implement the inspection program to fit the University’s evolving needs.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building OfficialProject Manager  BPR Consulting Group  2021 – Present
Mark provides Building Official services for several Cities and Counties throughout California. In addition, Mark provides supervision for inspection staff and clerical staff for the Cities and Counties where he works. Marks responsibilities also includes meeting with clients to ensure that expectations are being met and maintaining client relationships.

Inspection Manager  Consultant  2016 – 2021
Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fitthe changing needs of UC Merced.

Building Official City of Clovis2008 – 2015
Mark supervised 9 staff and was responsible for all building inspections. His duties included supervision and training of office staff and implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Planning and Development Services Department.

This system included complete integration with the City’s well-developed GIS systems. All permit processing was done manually before new permit tracking system was implemented. The program interfaces with the Tax Collector and Assessor’s Office. Mark formulated a million-dollar budget and presented it annually. He worked regularly with the Fire, Planning, and Engineering Departments.

Deputy Building Official City of Clovis  2006 – 2008
Mark supervised 14 staff responsible for building inspection processes and building permit fee revision. He trained office staff and implemented new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented new computerized permit fees to better comply with state laws and to track time for each inspection type.

Permit Coordinator County of Madera  2000 – 2006
Mark was responsible for all building inspection processes and coordinating building permit issuance. He performed all the duties of a Building Official, and supervised and trained a staff of 20 employees, as well as implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Resource Management Agency. Mark coordinated and supervised the remodel of a 37,000 square foot retail building into an office complex for the Resource Management Agency and moved four

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC – Non-Structural Plan Review
BPR
departments into one building. Mark’s duties allowed him to work regularly with the Environmental Health, Fire, Planning, Engineering and General Services, Public Works, Roads and Transportation Departments.

Building Inspector  Plans Examiner  Acting Chief Building Official  City of Madera | 1991 – 2000
As a building inspector, Mark inspected residential and commercial buildings, and was responsible for enforcing all building codes per State and local codes. As a plans examiner, Mark regularly worked with the planning department. He formulated the budget for the Building Department and regularly presented staff reports to the City Council. He also did preliminary work on designing a computerized tracking program for the issuance of permits for the Building Department. Mark was eventually designated Acting Chief Building Official.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion  University of California, Merced  2016 - 2021 Inspection Manager | Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fit the changing needs of UC Merced.

Table Mountain RancheriaFriant, CA  2018 – 2021
Building Official | Mark served as the Building Official for the Table Mountain Casino and Hotel Expansion providing guidance to the Tribe for code alternatives and manages the inspection and plan review team for the project.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

BPR

CERTIFICATIONS
 IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector,
030666
 IAPMO Certified Mechanical
Inspector, 090146
 CA LEED Certified, LEED AP BD+C,
10436985
 Certified Access Specialist, CASp-439
International Code Council, 1061008
 ICC Building Code Official
 ICC CA Residential Building,
Plumbing, Mechanical,
Combination, Electrical Inspector
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC CA Commercial Building,
Plumbing, Electrical, Combination,
Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Building, Electrical,
Combination, Mechanical , Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Combination Inspector
 ICC Mechanical UMC
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Commercial Combination
Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 International Code Council,
RICK WALTERS, CASp, LEED, CBO, ICC

NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Rick has over 30 years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the Building Inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official and inspector. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures.

Rick has provided inspection services for over 25 different City, County, State and Military installations. He inspected services of a Wildfire Disaster Zone involving over 100 structures and provided Flood Zone inspections for over 1,100 homes. He provided Chief Building Official services to the Cities of Dixon, Calistoga, Yountville, St. Helena, Gridley, Auburn and Woodland.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / BPR Consulting Group / 2021 - Present
Rick provides Building Official, building inspection, plan review, CASp review and inspection services for several clients in Northern California.

Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / Interwest Consulting Group / 2014 - 2021
Performed Building Official, building inspection and plan review services for various Northern California municipalities, as well as providing CASp plan review and inspection services.

Inspection Services / Bureau Veritas | Beale Air Force Base, CA / 2012 - 2014
Rick provides full inspection services for military housing at Beale Air Force Base. Inspections of single family homes and duplexes include foundation, framing, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and final inspections. Daily and weekly reports are compiled listing any deficiencies or items needing repair/replacement.

Fill-In Building Inspection Services / Bureau Veritas, CA / 2011 - 2012 Rick has provided fill-in building inspection services during staff vacations, sick-time, and periods of high-workload for the Cities of West Sacramento and Napa. He has inspected residential and commercial structures for compliance with all applicable building codes and local ordinances.

Building Inspection Services Manager / City of Woodland, CA / 2008 - 2011 Rick oversaw the inspection program for the City of Woodland. He managed and directed the inspectors on staff as well as performed inspections for residential, commercial, and industrial facilities.

EXHIBIT A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 58D6C38E-9C25-443D-BB56-D05A99443E47

RESOLUTION NO. ___________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

RENEWING THE AGREEMENT FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR
BUILDING AND FIRE PERMITS TO BPR CONSULTING GROUP, LLC.

WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has a goal to increase livability by promoting a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home; WHEREAS, La Mesa utilizes outside contracts to supplement staff in providing services as necessary to maintain high levels of service to the community; WHEREAS, the Fire Department has a need for outside contract assistance to provide plan review services for building and fire permits; WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals (RFP) 23-20 for plan review services for building and fire permits was published on the City's online bid system; WHEREAS, it was determined that BPR Consulting Group would best fit the City's needs for these services;
WHEREAS, a resolution was approved to award RFP 23-20 for Plan Review Services for Building and Fire Permits to BPR Consulting Group, LLC. For FY24.

WHEREAS, the initial amount of the contract was $50,000; WHEREAS, the need for plan review services has increased from the first year’s projections;
WHEREAS, the vendor has proven to be a positive assistance for the department in the plan review process, and staff would like to expand on this going forward; and WHEREAS, the Fire department is requesting to increase their annual expenditures, under this contract, to $100,000;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council approves the contract increase and renewal to BPR Consulting Group, LLC for plan review services for fiscal year 2024/2025 with three remaining one-year options to renew through fiscal year 2027/2028.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of August 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City
Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: August 13, 2024
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RIGHT-OF-WAY USE AGREEMENT

WITH PACIFIC WYYERD LLC FOR INSTALLATION,

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FIBER OPTIC

COMMUNICATION LINES IN CITY STREETS
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council approve a right-of-way use agreement with Pacific Wyyerd LLC for the installation, operation and maintenance of fiber optic communication lines in city streets?
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a right-of-way use agreement with Pacific Wyyerd LLC for the installation, operation and maintenance of fiber optic communication lines in city streets.

Fiscal Impact:

The City will receive an annual administrative fee of $3,000 annually for the 5-year term of the agreement. The City will also collect modest revenue from the issuance of encroachment and building permits.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: August 13, 2024
Page: 2 of 2
BACKGROUND:

As a telephone cooperation defined by the California Public Utilities Commission, Pacific Wyyerd LLC seeks to install fiber optic communication lines in La Mesa to provide to businesses and residences telecommunication services such as internet and streaming.

DISCUSSION:

Pacific Wyyerd proposes to enter into a 5-year agreement with the City to install, maintain and operate fiber optic communication lines within the public right-of-way. They will pay an administrative fee of $3,000 annually in addition to all fees related to the issuance of encroachment and building permits. All construction will be in accordance with City engineering standards. After the fifth year, a subsequent 5-year extension may be granted at the City’s discretion.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a right-of-way use agreement with Pacific Wyyerd LLC for the installation, operation and maintenance of fiber optic communication lines in city streets and authorizes the City Manager to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Attachments: A. Resolution with right-of-way use agreement

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

RESOLUTION APPROVING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF LA MESA AND PACIFIC WYYERD LLC FOR THE INSTALLATION,

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION

LINES IN CITY STREETS
WHEREAS, one of the City of La Mesa’s strategic goals is to invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community;
WHEREAS, Pacific Wyyerd LLC, a California telephone cooperation, seeks to expand its telecommunication service to La Mesa residences and businesses; WHEREAS, the City and Pacific Wyyerd LLC have agreed to terms and conditions to allow the orderly deployment of Wyyerd services into La Mesa.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and instructed to execute an agreement with Pacific Wyyerd LLC, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, for the installation, operation and maintenance of fiber optic communication lines in city streets.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of August 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

-1-

RIGHT-OF-WAY USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF LA MESA AND PACIFIC WYYERD LLC
This Right-of-Way Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of , 2024 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation (the “City”), and Pacific Wyyerd LLC, a limited liability company (“COMPANY”).

RECITALS
“COMPANY” includes its lawful successors or assigns pursuant CPUC 7901. “City” includes the duly elected or appointed officers, agents, and employees of the City of La Mesa, individually or collectively.
“Agency” herein refers to any local, county, state, or federal governmental agency or quasi-governmental body other than the City, including, without limitation the Federal Communications Commission and the State of California Public Utilities Commission.
“Agreement” means this “RIGHT-OF-WAY USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND COMPANY.”
“Council” or “Council Members” herein refers to elected officials which are authorized to exercise the legislative powers vested in City under Government Code section 37100.
“Day” herein refers to any calendar day, including weekends, holidays, and other non-business days unless otherwise specified. For the purposes of this Agreement, the time in which an act is to be performed shall be computed by excluding the first Day, or the day of submittal if applicable, and including the last. “Director of Public Works” includes the City Manager or his or her designee. “Fee” herein means any assessment, license, charge, cost, imposition, tax (Excluding utility users tax), or any lawfully cost imposed by any governmental body.
“Public Right of Way” or “ROW” herein means in, upon, along, across, through, under, or over the public streets, roads, lanes, boulevards, and places, including, without limitation, all public utility easements and public service easements, as the same now or may hereafter exist that are owned occupied, leased, or otherwise under the jurisdiction and control of City.
“Standard” shall herein mean the requirements of the City, or agency, that governs the design, construction, installation, or maintenance of any improvement within the City ROW.

-2-
A. COMPANY owns, maintains, operates and controls, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”), telecommunications networks serving homes, residences, businesses, and government agencies through fiber-to-the-premises network in public rights-of-way (“ROW”) in the State of California.

B. COMPANY is a competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) that holds a valid fullfacilities-based certificate of public convenience and necessity (“CPCN”) issued by the PUC on November 4, 2022 (Decision 22-11-014).

C. COMPANY shall maintain its status as a Telephone Cooperation pursuant CPUC 7901 at all times or the City shall reserve the right to reject all applications and void this agreement.

D. Pursuant to the rights afforded by the issuance of the CPCN, COMPANY seeks to enter the City’s ROW to install, maintain, operate and repair cable containing bundles of multiple optical fibers (the “Network”). The Network will provide fiber-based services, including internet services, telephony services, and end-to-end fiber-based services, to COMPANY’s customers (“Services”). While not its primary business focus, COMPANY may also provide ancillary fiber-based services to enterprise and wholesale customer segments. The Network will be designed to accommodate an initial customer as a carrier providing services (“Initial Carrier”). The Network also will allow additional carriers, to provide Services from the Network (“Additional Carriers”). For the avoidance of doubt, the City acknowledges that the above language is not imposing an open access network requirement on COMPANY.

E. Some features of the Network include, without limitation, conduit, fiber optic cable, ducts, inner-ducts, manholes, handholes, antenna, pedestals, fiber repeaters and related equipment in a configuration substantially similar to the construction drawings and elevations depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and to be located at certain locations described and diagrammed in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Facilities”).

F. COMPANY has certain rights to use the City’s ROW to deploy the Network under state and federal law, including, but not limited to, Public Utilities Code sections 1001, 7901 and 7901.1 and Government Code section 50030. The City has certain rights to control the time, place and manner of the installation of the Network.

In consideration of the Recitals set forth above, the terms and conditions of this Agreement and other valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. INSTALLATION OF THE NETWORK

1.1. Permitted Installation. COMPANY may at COMPANY’s sole cost and expense and during the term of this Agreement, locate, place, attach, install, operate, use, control, repair, upgrade, enhance and maintain the Network in the City’s ROW pursuant to all applicable local, state, and federal rules, regulations, and laws. As part of the Network, COMPANY also may install the Facilities at the locations within the City’s ROW depicted and described in Exhibit B. COMPANY shall undertake and perform any work authorized by this Agreement in a skillful and workmanlike manner. City agrees to make its poles, which are

-3-
located in the City’s ROW, available to COMPANY for COMPANY’s use in installing the Network. Such poles may include, but are not limited to traffic signal, streetlight, or any other pole capable of supporting COMPANY’s equipment (“City Poles”). COMPANY will make reasonable efforts to utilize City Poles, and existing third party poles (“Third Party Poles”) and structures for its Network prior to placing any new poles within the City’s ROW, which this agreement contemplates. In utilizing City Poles, it may be necessary to remove and replace such poles to accommodate COMPANY’s equipment. In any situation where COMPANY has a choice of attaching its Equipment to either City Poles or third-party-owned property in the Public Way, COMPANY agrees to attach to the City Poles, provided that (i) such City Poles are at least equally suitable functionally for the operation of the Network and (ii) the rental fee and installation costs associated with such attachment over the length of the term are equal to or less than the fee or cost to COMPANY of attaching to the alternative third-party-owned property.

1.2. Expansion of the Network. During the term of this Agreement, COMPANY may, pursuant to the prior written approval by the City, expand the Network by using other locations within the City’s ROW not described in Exhibit B. In such an event, the parties shall enter into an amendment to this Agreement, that will not require further discretionary review nor City Council action if the proposed Facilities are consistent with Exhibit A, that modifies Exhibit B to reflect the additional locations in the City’s ROW that COMPANY desires to use.

Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing, any expansion of the Network pursuant to this Section 1.1 shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

1.3. Compliance with Laws. This Agreement is subject to any and all applicable laws and the parties shall comply with any such laws in the exercise of their rights and performance of their obligations under this Agreement. “Law” or “Laws” as used in this Agreement means any and all statutes, constitutions, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, judicial decisions, rules, permits, approvals or other applicable requirements of the City or other governmental entity or agency having joint or several jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement or having jurisdiction that is applicable to any aspect of this Agreement, that are in force on the Effective Date of this Agreement.

1.4. Permits. COMPANY shall obtain any permits relating to the installation of the Network to the extent required by Law, including without limitation, those permits listed below (the “Permits”). COMPANY shall submit to the City’s Public Works Department, prior to installation, an application, for review and conceptual approval of the proposed installation Equipment. So long as the proposed Facility is in substantial conformance of Facilities listed in Exhibit A of this agreement, said permits will be approved administratively by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee within thirty (30) days of submittal.

1.4.1. Encroachment Permits. COMPANY shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the City for the installation of the Network and for any other work within the City’s ROW if required by the City’s Municipal Code (“Code”).

1.4.2. Building Permits. COMPANY shall obtain any necessary building permits from the City for the installation of the Network and for any other work within the City’s ROW if required by the Code.

-4-

1.4.3. Compliance with Permits. All work within the City’s ROW shall be performed in strict compliance with the applicable Permits and all applicable regulatory requirements.

1.4.4. Permitting Zones. COMPANY shall obtain an umbrella permit each year from the City per the City’s maintenance Zone Map that will dictate where repairs will be allowed. Public CIP projects are designed and completed on a yearly 7 Zone map (Exhibit C), and any work COMPANY wishes to complete outside of the approved Zone may be deferred until said Zone is approved at the City’s discretion.

1.5. Coordination of Excavation with Other Permittees. Upon request from the City, and at least thirty (30) days prior to commencing excavation work in the City’s ROW pursuant to this Agreement, COMPANY shall notify in writing, on a form approved by the City, other existing or potential users (“User”) of the City’s ROW which are (a) shown on the list of users maintained by the City; and (b) are likely to be affected by such excavation work. The notice shall describe the work to be performed, the specific ROW of the City that will be used, and the time when such work will be performed. Each User receiving such notice shall have thirty (30) days from the date thereof to inform in writing COMPANY and the City that such User desires to perform work jointly with COMPANY. To the extent reasonably feasible, and subject to COMPANY and User entering into a written agreement for such work and/or use, COMPANY shall coordinate its work with any User who timely informs COMPANY that it desires to perform work jointly in the City’s ROW, provided that such User obtains any required ROW agreement and permits from the City as required by the Code before such User performs any work in the City’s ROW, including the installation of any facilities, or uses any facilities installed by COMPANY on their behalf. Nothing in this section 1.4 is intended to cause delays to COMPANY’s construction schedule.

1.6. Fee. COMPANY is solely responsible for the payment of all lawful fees in connection with COMPANY’s performance under this Agreement, including those set forth below.

1.6.1. Right-of-Way Fee. Subject to the representations by COMPANY as to its status as a telephone corporation, and in accordance with California Public Utilities Code § 7901, in its current form and as currently interpreted by California courts with competent jurisdiction, the City shall not impose, and the COMPANY shall not be required to pay, any revenue generating, linear per foot fee, or right-of-way use fee in connection with its use or occupancy of the public rights-of-way for provision of telephone services. The COMPANY’s rights to use the City’s right-of-way free from any revenue-generating fee, linear per foot fee, or right-of-way use fee imposed by the City is based on the COMPANY’s CPCN and the COMPANY’s representations to the City that it will use the City’s right-of-way solely to provide telephone service to the public (or other such users as to be effectively available to the public) in accordance with the COMPANY’s CPCN. The City expressly reserves the right, in addition to all other rights that City has now or may have in the future, to amend this Agreement, in whole or in part, and require the COMPANY to comply with any lawful requirements, which may include full fair and reasonable compensation to the City for the COMPANY’s use and occupancy on, over, under, or in the City’s right of way if: (1) the COMPANY uses the facilities for any purposes other than to provide telephone services or any other purposes not sanctioned by the COMPANY’s CPCN; or (2) the City determines that the applicable laws, which includes without limitation

-5-
California Public Utilities Code § 7901 as may be amended or superseded in the future, do not preclude the City’s right to impose any other lawful requirements not contained in this Agreement. The foregoing condition is not applicable to a company subject to DIVCA that represents its status as a DIVCA certificate holder to use the City’s right-of-way. DIVCA certificate holders must comply with DIVCA with respect to making payments.

1.6.2. Administration Fee. In addition to the Right-of-Way Fee, COMPANY shall pay the City for the administration of the agreement three thousand ($3,000) dollars within forty-five (45) days of the execution of the agreement, amendment, or renewal and every 5 years thereafter for the term of the agreement, (“Administration Fee”). If the City incurs costs above $3,000 for administration during the term of the agreement, then COMPANY shall pay the City the additional fees within forty-five (45) days from the City request for reimbursement.

1.6.3. Permit Fees. In addition to the Right-of-Way and Administration Fees, COMPANY shall pay the City for all permits required to complete the installation and maintenance including but not limited to Encroachment permits, Traffic Control permits, and similar permit fees prior to conducting any work in the Public ROW. In Compensation to the City for COMPANY’s enhanced access, the COMPANY shall pay the City a flat fee per facility location per the City’s Standard ‘Minor Encroachment Permit Fee’ and ‘Minor Encroachment Permit Inspection Fee’ applicable for the reviewal and processing of overhead permits. The Encroachment Permit Fee for underground conduit installation, new facility installation changing the Right of Way in any form shall require the City’s standard ‘Major Encroachment Permit Fee’ and ‘Major Encroachment Permit Inspection Fee’. Any permits that have been approved as ‘Minor Encroachment Permits’ that require undergrounding or impact to the City’s ROW due to unforeseen conditions shall be subject to paying the City’s standard ‘Major Encroachment Permit Fee’ and ‘Major Encroachment Permit Inspection Fee’ and shall be subject to a full review, with the time for approval extended to the full ‘Major Encroachment Permit’ reviewal and approval process, prior to any undergrounding or ROW impacting the COMPANY requires to perform.

1.6.4. COMPANY shall provide a deposit of equal value to the Encroachment Permit Fee for any work within the City ROW.

2. TERM AND TERMINATION

2.1. Term. The initial term of this Agreement shall be for five (5) years (“Initial Term”) beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall automatically renew under the same terms and conditions for a successive five (5) year period (“Renewal Term”). Within one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the Renewal Term, COMPANY may request an additional five (5) year term, which the City may grant in its discretion. The term of any license granted pursuant to this Agreement shall be coextensive with the Term of this Agreement.

2.2. Termination of Use. Notwithstanding Section 2.1 above, COMPANY may terminate its use of any or all of the Network by providing the City with sixty (60) days’ prior written notice.

-6-

3. REMOVAL AND RELOCATION

3.1. Removal Due to Public Project. Except to the extent not permitted by Law, upon receipt of a written demand from the City pursuant to this Article 3, COMPANY, at its sole cost and expense, shall remove and relocate any part of the Network, constructed, installed, used and/or maintained by COMPANY under this Agreement, whenever the City reasonably determines that the removal and/or relocation of any part of the Network is needed for any of the following purposes:

3.1.1. due to any work proposed to be done by or on behalf of the City or any other governmental agency, including but not limited to, any change of grade, alignment or width of any street, sidewalk or other public facility, installation of curbs, gutters or landscaping and installation, construction, maintenance or operation of any underground or aboveground facilities such as sewers, water mains, drains, storm drains, pipes, gas mains, poles, power lines, telephone lines, cable television lines and tracks;

3.1.2. because any part of the Network is interfering with or adversely affecting the proper operation of City-owned light poles, traffic signals, or other City facilities; or

3.1.3. to protect or preserve the public health and safety.

3.1.3.1. Pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code, section 21.04.02, if aerial installation is allowed prior to the formation of a utility underground district encompassing COMPANY installations, future undergrounding of COMPANY facilities shall be done at COMPANY’s sole cost.

The City shall cooperate with COMPANY in relocating any portion of the Network removed pursuant to this Section 3.1 in a manner that allows COMPANY to continue providing service to its customers, including, but not limited to, expediting approval of any necessary permits required for the relocation of that portion of the Network relocated under this Section

3.1. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the City issues a permit subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement to a private developer, and such work contemplated under the permit requires the removal or relocation of any of COMPANY’s equipment subject to this Agreement, temporary or otherwise, those costs shall be borne by the developer.

3.2. Removal Due to Termination. Except to the extent not permitted by Law, no later than ninety (90) days after termination of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, COMPANY shall, at its sole cost and expense, remove the Network and, if such removal disturbs the City’s ROW, restore the City’s ROW to its original condition.

Alternatively, the City may allow COMPANY, in the City’s sole and absolute discretion, to abandon the Network, or any part thereof, in place and convey it to the City.

3.3. Abandonment. In the event COMPANY ceases to maintain and/or abandons the Network, or any part thereof, for a period of ninety (90) days or more, COMPANY shall, at its sole cost and expense and no more than 30 days after expiration of the 90-day time period herein, vacate and remove the Network or the abandoned part thereof. If such removal disturbs the City’s ROW, COMPANY shall also, at its sole cost and expense, restore the City’s ROW to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and further excepting landscaping

-7-
and related irrigation equipment, or other aesthetic improvements made by COMPANY to the City’s ROW. Alternatively, the City may allow COMPANY, in the City’s sole and absolute discretion, to abandon the Network, or any part thereof, in place and convey it to the City.

4. RECORDS AND FIELD LOCATIONS

4.1. Notification. COMPANY shall be a member of the regional notification center for subsurface installations (Underground Services Alert) and shall field mark, at its sole expense, the locations of its underground Telecommunications Network Facilities upon notification in accordance with the requirements of section 4216 of the California government code, as it currently reads or as it is hereinafter amended.

4.2. As-Builts. COMPANY shall maintain accurate maps, improvement plans, and as-builts of said Telecommunications Network Facilities located within the City. The maps, plans, and as-builts are to accurately show in detail each location of work, along with the size, depth, description, and notes on any field changes of all facilities constructed. Prior to City acceptance, COMPANY shall provide maps, plans, and as-builts to the City free of charge, and at any subsequent time at the City’s request or to any third party representing the City or working within the City within thirty (30) days after such request. When required by the City for the purpose of confirming the location of Facilities to accomplish the design or construction of public facilities, the COMPANY shall, at its sole cost and expense, expose by potholing to a depth of one (1) foot below the bottom of its subsurface Telecommunications Network Facilities, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a written request by the City.

4.3. Locating Wire. COMPANY shall install locator wire in conjunction with its construction of the Telecommunications Network Facilities pursuant to this Agreement.

5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

5.1. Electricity Use. COMPANY shall pay for the electricity it consumes in its operations at the rate charged by the servicing utility company.

5.2. Maintenance and Repair. COMPANY shall, at COMPANY’s sole cost and expense, perform all maintenance and repairs reasonably needed to maintain the Network in good condition and appearance, and in compliance with all applicable Laws. In the event any part of the Network requires replacement because such part cannot be repaired, COMPANY shall, at COMPANY’s sole cost and expense, replace the irreparable part of the Network. If in the City’s reasonable judgment, any portion of the Network is in need of repair, the City shall notify COMPANY in writing of the City’s determination. The Parties may meet and confer to discuss the nature of the City’s determination and establish a timeline for maintenance and/or repair. COMPANY shall have sixty (60) days from notice from the City to make such repair which may be extended by the City so long as COMPANY is diligently pursuing the repair. If after sixty (60) days, or an extension granted by the City, COMPANY has not repaired its Network to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, the City may make, or cause to make the repair utilizing the bond in Section 4.4 below as reimbursement for any costs incurred by the City effecting the repair.

-8-

5.3. Repair of ROW. COMPANY shall be responsible for any damage, ordinary wear and tear excepted, to street pavement, existing facilities and utilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, and all other public or private facilities to the extent caused by COMPANY’s construction, installation, maintenance, access, use, repair, replacement, relocation, or removal of the Network in the City’s ROW (“COMPANY’s Activities”). COMPANY shall promptly repair such damage and return the City’s ROW and any affected adjacent property to a safe and satisfactory condition to the City in accordance with the City’s applicable street restoration standards or to the property owner if not the City. COMPANY’s obligations under this Section 4.3 shall survive for one (1) year past the completion of such reparation and restoration work and return of the affected part of the City’s ROW by COMPANY to the City.

5.4. Bond. Prior to commencement of construction as allowed by issuance of a permit, the COMPANY shall post a performance bond in a form acceptable to the City in accordance with applicable law and based on a written estimate from a qualified contractor with experience in infrastructure removal or registered civil engineer. The written estimate must include the cost to remove all facilities and other improvements constructed or installed in connection with the facilities, plus the cost to completely restore any public rights-of-way and areas affected by the removal work to a standard compliant with applicable laws. The City, in the City’s sole discretion, may authorize the COMPANY to post a single performance bond to cover multiple sites or permits subject to the City' s rules and regulations if the amount for additional permits is increased in accordance with the terms of this condition. The performance bond required by this condition shall expressly survive the duration of the permit term. Any failure by COMPANY to comply with this condition before permit issuance shall not relieve the COMPANY of any of its bond related obligations, nor constitute any waiver of such requirements and COMPANY shall post the required bond immediately and, in any event, before commencing construction. Upon the completion of construction allowed by issuance of a permit and submittal of as-built drawings to City by COMPANY, City shall inspect the completed construction within 30 days. Upon inspection and approval by City, City shall release the performance bond associated with the inspected and approved work within thirty (30) days of final approval by City.

6. TAXES

6.1. Taxes. COMPANY agrees that it will be solely responsible for the payment of any and all lawful taxes, fees and assessments levied on its use and maintenance of the Network.

Pursuant to Section 107.6 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the City hereby advises, and COMPANY recognizes and understands, that COMPANY’s use of the City’s ROW may create a possessory interest subject to real property taxation and that COMPANY may be subject to the payment of real property taxes levied on such interest. COMPANY will cooperate with the San Diego County Assessor in providing any information necessary for the Assessor to make a property tax determination. COMPANY reserves the right to challenge any such assessment, and the City agrees to cooperate with COMPANY in connection with any such challenge.

7. INDEMNIFICATION

7.1. Indemnity. COMPANY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its councilmembers, officers, employees, agents, and contractors, from and against liability,

-9-
claims, demands, losses, damages, fines, charges, penalties, administrative and judicial proceedings and orders, judgments, and the costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of defense to the extent directly or proximately resulting from COMPANY’s Activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, except to the extent arising from or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its councilmembers, officers, employees, agents, or contractors. The City shall promptly notify COMPANY of any claim, action or proceeding covered by this Section 6.1.

City agrees to indemnify COMPANY to the extent permitted by applicable law.

7.2. Waiver of Claims. The City and its officers, agents, elected or appointed officials, employees, departments, boards and commissions, shall not be liable to COMPANY or to its affiliates or customers for any interference with or disruption in the operations of COMPANY’s Network or the provision of services, or for any damages arising out of or materially related to COMPANY’s use of the ROW, except to the extent of intentional misconduct or gross negligent on the part of the City and its officers, agents, elected or appointed officials, employees, departments, boards and commissions. COMPANY waives all claims, demands, causes of action, and rights it may assert against the City on account of any loss, damage, or injury to any portion of the Network, or any loss or degradation of the services provided by the Network resulting from any event or occurrence that is beyond the City’s reasonable control.

7.3. Limitation of Liability. Neither party to this Agreement shall be liable to the other for indirect, punitive or consequential damages for any activities related to this Agreement.

8. INSURANCE

8.1. Minimum Insurance Requirements. COMPANY shall obtain and maintain at its sole cost and expense for the duration of this Agreement insurance pursuant to the terms and conditions described in this Article.

8.1.1. Minimum Insurance. COMPANY shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

8.1.1.1. General Liability: A policy or policies of Commercial General Liability Insurance, with minimum limits of $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, death, loss and property damage resulting from wrongful or negligent acts by COMPANY. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The required commercial general liability limit may be met by a combination of primary and excess or umbrella policies.

8.1.1.2. Automobile Liability: A policy or policies of Commercial Vehicle Liability Insurance covering personal injury and property damage, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage covering any vehicle utilized by COMPANY in performing the work covered by this Agreement.

-10-

8.1.1.3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ compensation limits as required by the Labor Code, and Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.

8.1.2. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000; provided, however, if COMPANY’s insurance policy expressly provides (i) that the insurer is required to pay covered claims with no deduction for all or any part of the COMPANY’s deductible, and (ii) insurer’s obligation to pay covered claims is triggered irrespective of whether or not the insured pays the deductible, then the limitation does not apply.

8.1.3. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

8.1.3.1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage.

8.1.3.1.1. The City, and its elected and appointed council members, board members, commissioners, officers and officials (the “Insureds”) shall be named as additional insureds on all required insurance policies, except for Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability policies.

8.1.3.1.1.1. COMPANY’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance in regard to the Insureds with respect to the matters covered by this Agreement. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Insureds shall be in excess of COMPANY’s insurance and shall be non-contributory.

8.1.3.1.1.2. Any failure of COMPANY to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the Insureds.

8.1.3.1.1.3. COMPANY’s insurance shall apply separately to each of the Insureds against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Each of the Insureds is subject to all policy terms and conditions and has an obligation, as an Insured, to report claims made against them to the insurance carrier.

8.1.3.1.2. Worker’s Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Insureds for losses arising from work performed by COMPANY in the City’s ROW.

8.1.3.1.3. All Coverages. Except for non-payment of premium, each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to provide at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the City. If for any reason insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits, COMPANY shall, within five (5) business days of notice from the insurer, notify the City by phone or fax of the changes to or cancellation of the policy and shall confirm such notice via certified mail, return receipt requested.

-11-

8.1.4. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with an A.M.

Best rating of no less than A-:VII.

8.1.5. Verification of Coverage. COMPANY shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance required by this Article7. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person, either manually or electronically, authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates are to be received and approved by the City before work commences, which approval may not be reasonably withheld.

9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1. No Waiver. The parties do not intend, and nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as, a waiver of any of COMPANY’s rights under state and/or federal law, including, but not limited to, Public Utilities Code section 7901 and 7901.1 and Government Code section 50030.

9.2. Non-exclusive Use. COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement does not provide COMPANY with exclusive use of the City’s ROW or any municipal facility and that City retains the right to permit other providers of communications services to install equipment or devices in the City’s ROW and on municipal facilities, so long as subsequently granted permits do not interfere with COMPANY’s operation of its Network. COMPANY acknowledges that the City may make information available to other providers of communications services concerning the presence or planned deployment of the Network in the City’s ROW.

9.3. Notices. All notices which shall or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and personally served or transmitted through first class United States mail, or by private delivery systems, postage prepaid, to the following address or such other address of which a party may give written notice:

City:

Attention: City Manager
With a copy to:
[City Attorney]
COMPANY: Pacific Wyyerd LLC
Scott Beer
Chief Legal Officer
Attn: Legal
1601 29th St., STE
Boulder, CO 80301

-12-
With a copy which shall not constitute notice to:

Pacific Wyyerd LLC
401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 100
National City, CA 91950
Any notice required or provided for under this Agreement shall be deemed served at the time of personal service. Mailed notices will be deemed served as of the day of receipt.

9.4. Most Favored Nations. In the event COMPANY obtains another Right of Way Use Agreement with a municipality within San Diego County, which contains different terms than this Agreement, City shall have the right to amend this Agreement to incorporate said terms.

9.5. Transfers. COMPANY shall provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the City prior to any transfer of any part of the Network to a third party. An assignment shall not be effective until the proposed transferee agrees in writing to comply with and be subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Code. Without limiting any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, COMPANY may in the ordinary course of its business and without the prior written consent of or notice to the City: (a) lease the Network, or any portion thereof, to another person; (b) grant an indefeasible right of user interest in the Network or any portion thereof to another person; or (c) offer or provide capacity or bandwidth from the Network to another person; (d) assign any contract to any entity which controls, is controlled by, or which is under common control with COMPANY or to any entity acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of COMPANY. Provided that whether COMPANY does any of these three things listed in (a) – (c) of this section, it or one of its affiliates must at all times retain exclusive control over the Network and remain responsible for locating, servicing, repairing, maintaining, replacing, relocating, or removing the Network pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

9.6. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, assigns and transferees.

9.7. Entire Agreement; Modification; Waiver. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations, negotiations, and understandings of the parties, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof, are merged into and superseded by this Agreement. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be of no force and effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar. No waiver or consent shall constitute a continuing waiver or consent or commit either party to provide a waiver in the future except to the extent specifically set forth in writing. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver.

9.8. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judicial action to be void, voidable, or unenforceable, such provision or provisions shall be deemed separable from the remaining provisions of this

-13-
Agreement and shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement.

9.9. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced according to, and the parties rights and obligations governed by, the domestic law of the State of California, without regard to its laws regarding choice of applicable law. Any proceeding or action to enforce this Agreement shall occur in the federal court with jurisdiction over San Diego County and the state courts located in San Diego County, California.

9.10. Survival of Terms. All of the terms and conditions in this Agreement related to payment, removal due to termination, indemnification, limits of City’s liability, and waiver shall survive termination of this Agreement.

9.11. Captions and Paragraph Headings. Captions and paragraph headings used herein are for convenience only. They are not a part of this Agreement and shall not be used in construing this Agreement.

9.12. Exhibits. All Exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated as though set forth in full herein.

9.13. Drafting. The parties agree that this Agreement is the project of joint draftsmanship and that should any of the terms be determined by a court, or in any type of quasi-judicial or other proceeding, to be vague, ambiguous and/or unintelligible, that the same sentences, phrases, clauses or other wording or language of any kind shall not be construed against the drafting party in accordance with California Civil Code Section 1654, and that each party to this Agreement waives the effect of such statute.

9.14. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more identical counterparts and all such counterparts together shall constitute a single instrument for the purpose of the effectiveness of this Agreement.

9.15. Authority to Execute This Agreement. Each person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of a party, warrants and represents that he or she has the full right, power, legal capacity and authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and has the authority to bind such party to the performance of its obligations under this Agreement without the approval or consent of any other person or entity.

9.16. Controlling Terms. This Agreement shall supersede any previous agreements entered into by the Parties, or in the case of COMPANY, by any of its predecessors or acquirees, and if a conflict shall exist between the instant Agreement and any previous, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

-14-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the date stated in the introductory clause.

City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation
By:

City Manager
Greg Humora

COMPANY, Pacific Wyyerd LLC
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:________________________________
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Megan Wiegelman, CMC
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:_______________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
Glenn Sabine

-15-

EXHIBIT A
Equipment
Attached behind this page are descriptions and diagrams of the Facilities covered that will be installed under this Agreement.

PART NO. 1730 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES BODY: POLYMER CONCRETE COVER: POLYMER CONCRETE WEIGHT 145-195 LBS. TOLERANCE +/- 1/8" ANSI/SCTE 77 2013 TIER 15/22 RATED 10/21/2014 FILE 1730 PC SERIES THIS PRODUCT DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF MARTIN ENTERPRISES. THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO BE ALTERED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY MARTIN ENTERPRISES.

HARDWARE DETAIL

CUTAWAY
VIEW

NON SKID SURFACE

LIFT PINS

COVER VIEW
1730 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES / TIER 22

TOP VIEW

MARKING
BOLT
HOLES (X2)
3/8" INSERTS
Pc05MIX
3208 COMBO MAT (IN RED)
24 OZ (IN BLUE)

CUTAWAY
VIEW

EXTERIOR WALL
PC05 MIX
YELLOW REPRESENTS 10

OZ MAT - BUILT INTO

THE INTERIOR AND

EXTERIOR WALL

CUT-AWAY VIEW

INTERIOR
WALL
3/4" TYPICAL WALL END VIEW THICKNESS

RING HOLE RING
COVER
1 1
8" WASHER
N.T.S.

SIDE VIEW
13" X 24" X 18" VAULT DETAIL
11 3
4 "
21 1
4 "
15 1
2 "
1"
2 1
2 "
12"/18"/24"
2" 23 1
4 "
8"
13 2"
3 4
"
25"
23 1
4 " GRADE
GRADE
3

PART NO. 1730 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES BODY: POLYMER CONCRETE COVER: POLYMER CONCRETE WEIGHT 145-195 LBS. TOLERANCE +/- 1/8" ANSI/SCTE 77 2013 TIER 15/22 RATED 10/21/2014 FILE 1730 PC SERIES THIS PRODUCT DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF MARTIN ENTERPRISES. THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO BE ALTERED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY MARTIN ENTERPRISES.

HARDWARE DETAIL

CUTAWAY
VIEW

NON SKID SURFACE

LIFT PINS

COVER VIEW
1730 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES / TIER 15 & 22

TOP VIEW

MARKING
BOLT
HOLES (X2)
3/8" INSERTS
Pc05MIX
3208 COMBO MAT (IN RED)
24 OZ (IN BLUE)

CUTAWAY
VIEW

EXTERIOR WALL
PC05 MIX
YELLOW REPRESENTS 10

OZ MAT - BUILT INTO

THE INTERIOR AND

EXTERIOR WALL

CUT-AWAY VIEW

INTERIOR
WALL
3/4" TYPICAL WALL END VIEW THICKNESS

RING HOLE RING
COVER
1 1
8" WASHER
N.T.S.

SIDE VIEW
17" X 30" VAULT DETAIL
15 3
4 "
28 5
8 "
19 7
8 "
1"
2 1
2 "
12"/18"/22"/24"/30"
1 7
8 "
30 3
4 "
8"
17 2"
1 2
"
32 3
4 " 30 3
4 "

2436 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES / TIER 15 & 22

EXTERIOR WALL
PC05 MIX

YELLOW REPRESENTS
10 OZ MAT - BUILT

INTO THE INTERIOR

AND EXTERIOR WALL

CUT-AWAY VIEW

INTERIOR
WALL
9/16" TYPICAL WALL THICKNESS

TOP VIEW

END VIEW
3/8" INSERTS

MARKING
BOLT
HOLE
3208 COMBO MAT (IN RED)
24 OZ (IN BLUE)

CUTAWAY
VIEW
Pc05MIX

HARDWARE DETAIL
DRAIN

HOLE CORROSION

RESISTANT INSERT
COVER
1 1
8" WASHER
RING

SIDE VIEW
PART NO. 2436 POLYMER CONCRETE SERIES
BODY: POLYMER CONCRETE COVER: POLYMER CONCRETE WEIGHT 260-425 LBS. TOLERANCE +/- 1/8" ANSI/SCTE 77 2013 TIER 15/22 RATED 10/21/2014 FILE 2436 PC SERIES
THIS PRODUCT DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF MARTIN ENTERPRISES. THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO BE ALTERED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY MARTIN ENTERPRISES.

NON SKID

BOLT HOLE SURFACE

COVER VIEW

STAINLESS STEEL LIFT PINS
37"

LIFTING BOLT
3/8 SS HEX HEAD BOLT
2' X 3' VAULT DETAIL N.T.S.
18"
26 1
4 "
3 7
8 "
1"
12"
33 7
8 "
22 1
4 " 23 7
8 " 6 3
4 "
2 7
8 " 35 3
4 " 37 3
4 "

30" X 48" VAULT DETAIL N.T.S.
15"

SIDE VIEW

END VIEW
13230 Saticoy Street. North Hollywood, CA 91065
(818) 982-3800
ARMORCAST@PRODUCTS COMPANY

THE INFORMATION IN THIS DRAWING IS CONFIDENTIAL, THE DRAWING

IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR ITS CONTENTS DIVULGED IN ANY WAY

WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF
ARMORCAST PRODUCTS COMPANY. 13233 SATICOY STREET, NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA 91065
30"X48"X18" POLYMER CONCRETE BOX & COVER ASSEMBLY

PART DESCRIPTION

CUSTOMER WYYERD
DRAWN DATE SCALE HB 2/98 NONE
APROV. MATERIAL WS 2/98 POLYMER CONCRETE
MAX. LOAD 20,000 LBS. MAX. LOAD
DRAWING NUMBER A6001430TAPCX18
49 7/8"
47 5/8"
18"
47 7/8"
30 3/8"

RPM BOX PLAN VIEW
30 1/8"
32 3/8"

OPEN BASE

ARMOCAST
LOGO

NON-SKID

SURFACE

POLYMER

CONCRETE
BOX
BOLTDOWN (4X)
WYYERD LIFT PIN(2X) 20K
WYYERD 20K
WYYERD
20K
47 5/8"
3"
APPROX. WT. = 369 LBS
LIFT PIN(2X)
WYYERD
20K 30 1/8"

POLYMER CONCRETE COVER
4"
1/4" S.S.

ROD

VAULT WITH NON SKID SURFACE,

COEFFICIENT OF STATIC FRICTION
= >0.6 ASTM 1028
1

36" X 60" X 36" VAULT DETAIL N.T.S.
3660 OLD CASTLE FRP HANDHOLE
36"
41 1
2 "
62 7
8 "

MODEL SIZE (LXW) DEPTH AVAILABLE COVERS
3660 36"X60" 36" LW DURALITE

POLYOLEFN BLEND (GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER PLASTIC)

COMPOSITE (GLASS FIBER REINFORCED SMC) STRAIGHT
TIER 15*, TIER 22 MEDIUM DUTY, HEAVY DUTY

BODY MATERIAL COVER MATERIAL WALL TYPE

PERFORMANCE RATINGS
2

FLOWER POT HANDHOLE DETAIL N.T.S.
11"
12"
WYYERD
11"
11"

FOR PROPER CABLE CABLE ENTRY INTO THE CABINET, PLACE

CONDUIT INTO THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS
A. 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC CONDUIT FOR OUTSIDE PLANT CABLE
B. EARTH GROUND WIRE (PREFERED LOCATION FOR DIRECT
CONNECTION TO CABINER GROUND BAR).

C. 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT FOR AC CABLE

USE THE CLEARFEILD CAST IN PLACE TEMPLATE TO PROVIDE

PRECISE CONDUIT ORIENTION
A.

B.

CONDUIT LOCATIONS
A.

A.

TEMPLATE MOUNTING
STUDS

CONCRETE PAD EARTHGROUND WIRE

COMPACTED

SOIL GRAVEL

PAD CROSS SECTION
(1) 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC
(1) 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC
(2) 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC

PAD CROSS SECTIONS

3.25 DIA

PAD OVERVIEW
CABINET DETAILS N.T.S.

NEW ONT SPECIFICATIONS

REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW
H
W D1
D2
(DOOR REMOVED) (DOOR REMOVED) (DOOR REMOVED)
23"X27RU

HORIZONTAL EQUIPMENT RACK AREA
23"X27RU

HORIZONTAL EQUIPMENT RACK AREA
23"/36"X31RU

HORIZONTAL EQUIPMENT RACK AREA

COPPER OR

SPLICE COMPONENT
FAC 5400 - ACTIVE ELECTRONICSENCLOSURE
Weight: 1175 lbs.

Dimensions: H 74.0-in
Supported Batteries: (3) Strings - Northstar NSB - 100FT 100Ah (3) Strings - Northstar NSB - 170FT 170Ah
(3) Strings - Northstar NSB - 190FT 190Ah
W: 49.0 - in D1: 58.0 - in
D2: 66.0 - in

CLEARFIELD
96"
47"
44"
25"

1.38" 1.38"

3.13"
6" 43" 72" 46" 13" 21"

7.25" 4.73" 10.91" 42.39" 18.38"
CABINET PAD DETAILS N.T.S.

C.
3 4

SINGLE METER SERVICE PEDESTAL

TYPICAL APPLICATIONS INCLUDE PARKING LOT

LIGHTING, HIGHWAY, STREET AND SIGN
LIGHTING AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIRCUITS.

STANDARD FEATURES
METER SOCKET WITH TEST BLOCKS 4+JAW
UTILITY LANDING LUGS 250kCMIL
STANDARD VOLTAGE 120/240 VAC 1-PHASE 3-WIRE

CIRCUIT BREAKER INTERIOR COPPER BUS
*ALL METERED 12-CIRCUIT 125 OR 200 AMPEREA OR
8-CIRCUIT 125 AMPERES, METERED AND UN-METERED
ACCOMODATES 24-CIRCUIT INTERIOR MAXIMUM

SPECIFICATIONS
* LIGHT GREEN COLOR NO. 14672 PER
FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONS 595 -
* ALL FACTORY WIRING 600 VOLT RATED COPPER
* ALL COMPONETS UL LISTED
* ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND COVERS PADLOCKABLE
* UTILITY COVERS SEALABLE
* COMPLIES WITH EUSERC STANDARDS & DWG. 308
* 12 GA. NEMA 3R CONSTRUCTION
* POLYESTER POWDER-COATED FINISH
EXCEEDS ASTM B-117 SPECIFICATIONS
* FABRICATED FROM CORROSION-RESISTANT

ZINC COATED STEEL
* AVAILABLE IN ALUMINUM & STAINLESS STEEL

CALTRANS TYPE III-BF
LINE
LOAD
FRONT

CUSTOMER

SECTION
PUP
METER
AND
TEST
BLOCK

SECTION UTILITY PULL SECTION

LOAD LINE

FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW
16" 16.50"
48"

8.53" 6.71"
3"

27.5"

14.25"

6.71"

8.53"
13"

12.25"
POWER PEDESTAL DETAIL N.T.S.
100 AMP METER PEDESTAL -
PART # USP16M210012CTBSD +

PEDBASE
5

STANDARD

INSTALLATION TYPES
Existing Conduit
Plow
Directional Bore

STANDARD COLORS

FEATURES

SMOOTHWALL
• Manufactured from flexible HDPE, makes gradual bends without special equipment
• Continuous lengths reduce joining costs
• Excellent low temperature properties, allows installation in cold climates
• Outstanding long term cable protection from shifting ground, rock and root impingement
• Provides a permanent pathway, simpifies future cable repairs or replacement
UV
UV

SIZE RANGE AVAILABLE

0.5"

0.75"

1.0"

1.25"

1.5"

2.0"

2.5"

3.0"

4.0"

5.0"

6.0"

8.0"

10.0"

12.0"

WALL TYPES
SDR-9
SDR-11
SDR-13.5
SDR-15.5
SDR-17
SCH-40
SCH-80
SIDR-9
SIDR-11

STANDARD
FOOTAGE MARKINGS Sequential foot or meter markings. Custom print streams available.

SPECIFICATIONS All Smoothwall conduit dimensions meets or exceeds one or more of the following:

ASTM F-2160, ASTM D-3035, ASTM D-2239, ASTM D-3485, NEMA TC-7, UL 651, UL 1990, Bellcore GR-356.

OPTIONS
SILICORE is co-extruded with the tough HDPE jacket creating a super, slick permanent lining. SILICORE lined ducts allow for higher speed cable jetting and longer cable pulls.

PREINSTALLED TAPE Factory pre-installed Bull-Line™ Pull Tape with EVEN-LOAD™, ensures extra slack at any access point throughout the reel. Available 500lb–6,000lb tensile strength or locatable.

UL LISTING AVAILABLE from ½"–6" for SDR 13.5, SCH 40 and SCH 80.

EXTERNAL STRIPES can be added from our standard color offering to facilitate visual identification.

UV PROTECTANT available for aerial/lashed placement.
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

WALL TYPE
PIPE SIZE ½" ¾" 1" 1¼" 1½" 2" 2 ½"
NOM OD (IN) 0.840 1.050 1.315 1.660 1.900 2.375 2.875
OD TOLERENCE +/– 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 BEND RADIUS (IN) SUPPORTED 8 10 13 17 19 24 29
BEND RADIUS (IN) UNSUPPORTED 16 20 26 34 38 48 58
SDR-9
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.093 0.117 0.146 0.184 0.211 0.264 0.319 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.022 0.025 0.032 0.038 AVG ID (IN) 0.634 0.796 1.003 1.270 1.453 1.815 2.199
MIN ID (IN) 0.614 0.776 0.983 1.248 1.428 1.783 2.161
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.098 0.152 0.234 0.370 0.485 0.759 1.110 SWPS (LBS) 525 821 1,288 ,052 2,688 4,200 6,155
SDR-11
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.076 0.095 0.120 0.151 0.173 0.216 0.261 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.026 0.031 AVG ID (IN) 0.668 0.840 1.055 1.338 1.533 1.917 2.322
MIN ID (IN) 0.648 0.820 1.035 1.318 1.512 1.891 2.291
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.084 0.128 0.199 0.312 0.408 0.636 0.930 SWPS (LBS) 440 687 1078 1717 2249 3515 5151
SDR-13.5
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.062 0.078 0.097 0.123 0.141 0.176 0.213 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.026 AVG ID (IN) 0.696 0.874 1.101 1.394 1.598 2.002 2.423
MIN ID (IN) 0.676 0.854 1.081 1.374 1.578 1.981 2.397
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.072 0.110 0.167 0.263 0.342 0.528 0.775 SWPS (LBS) 365 570 894 1425 1867 2917 4274
SDR-15.5
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.062 0.068 0.084 0.107 0.123 0.153 0.185 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.018 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.022 AVG ID (IN) 0.698 0.894 1.127 1.426 1.634 2.049 2.483
MIN ID (IN) 0.680 0.874 1.107 1.406 1.614 2.029 2.461
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.071 0.098 0.149 0.234 0.304 0.467 0.680 SWPS (LBS) 792 1,234 1,607 2,466 3,592
SDR-17
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.062 0.077 0.098 0.112 0.140 0.169
WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020
AVG ID (IN) 0.906 1.141 1.444 1.656 2.075 2.517
MIN ID (IN) 0.886 1.121 1.424 1.636 2.055 2.497
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.091 0.138 0.217 0.281 0.432 0.625
SWPS (LBS) 460 722 1150 1507 2355 3450
SMOOTHWALL (SDR) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (SIZES 3"-12" NEXT PAGE) (SIZES 3"-12: NEXT PAGE)
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

WALL TYPE
PIPE SIZE 3" 4" 5" 6" 8" 10" 12"
NOM OD (IN) 3.500 4.500 5.563 6.625 8.625 10.750 12.750 OD TOLERENCE +/– 0.018 0.023 0.028 0.033 0.043 0.054 0.064 BEND RADIUS (IN) SUPPORTED 39 50 61 73 155 194 230
BEND RADIUS (IN) UNSUPPORTED 78 100 122 146 233 290 344 SDR-9
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.389 0.500 0.618 0.736 0.958 1.194 1.417 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.047 0.060 0.074 0.088 0.115 0.143 0.170 AVG ID (IN) 2.675 3.440 4.253 5.065 6.593 8.219 9.746
MIN ID (IN) 2.628 3.380 4.179 4.977 6.479 8.076 9.576
WEIGHT (#/FT) 1.648 2.723 4.161 5.901 10.001 15.534 21.866 SWPS (LBS) 9,122 15,080 23,045 32,684 55,397 8,6057 121,056 SDR-11
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.318 0.409 0.506 0.602 0.784 0.977 1.159 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.038 0.049 0.061 0.072 0.094 0.117 0.139 AVG ID (IN) 2.826 3.633 4.490 5.349 6.963 8.679 10.293
MIN ID (IN) 2.788 3.584 4.429 5.277 6.869 8.562 10.154
WEIGHT (#/FT) 1.380 2.282 3.490 4.944 8.383 13.019 18.319 SWPS (LBS) 7633 12618 19284 27349 46355 72010 101297
SDR-13.5
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.259 0.333 0.412 0.491 0.639 0.796 0.944 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.031 0.040 0.049 0.059 0.077 0.096 0.113 AVG ID (IN) 2.951 3.794 4.690 5.584 7.270 9.062 10.749
MIN ID (IN) 2.920 3.754 4.641 5.525 7.193 8.966 10.636
WEIGHT (#/FT) 1.146 1.895 2.896 4.112 6.969 10.821 15.214 SWPS (LBS) 6335 10472 16004 22697 38470 59762 84067
SDR-15.5
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.226 0.290 0.359 0.427
WALL TOLERANCE + 0.027 0.035 0.043 0.051
AVG ID (IN) 3.021 3.885 4.802 5.720
MIN ID (IN) 2.994 3.850 4.759 5.669
WEIGHT (#/FT) 1.011 1.669 2.552 3.615
SWPS (LBS) 5,342 8,814 13,483 19,123
SDR-17
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.206 0.265 0.327 0.390
WALL TOLERANCE + 0.025 0.032 0.039 0.047
AVG ID (IN) 3.063 3.938 4.870 5.798
MIN ID (IN) 3.038 3.906 4.831 5.751
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.928 1.534 2.339 3.324
SWPS (LBS) 5114 8453 12918 18321
SMOOTHWALL (SDR) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (SIZES ½"-2½" PREVIOUS PAGE) (SIZES ½"-2½" PREVIOUS PAGE)
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

WALL TYPE
PIPE SIZE ½" ¾" 1" 1¼" 1½" 2" 2 ½"
NOM OD (IN) 0.840 1.050 1.315 1.660 1.900 2.375 2.875
OD TOLERENCE +/– 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 BEND RADIUS (IN) SUPPORTED 8 10 13 17 19 24 29
BEND RADIUS (IN) UNSUPPORTED 16 20 26 34 38 48 58
SCH-40
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.109 0.113 0.133 0.140 0.145 0.154 0.203 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.024 MIN ID (IN) 0.582 0.784 1.009 1.340 1.570 2.027 2.421
AVG ID (IN) 0.602 0.804 1.029 1.360 1.590 2.047 2.445
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.111 0.148 0.217 0.293 0.350 0.469 0.740 SWPS (LBS) 601 798 1340 1604 1919 2579 4090
SCH-80
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.147 0.154 0.179 0.191 0.200 0.218 0.276 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.023 0.024 0.026 0.033 MIN ID (IN) 0.506 0.702 0.915 1.232 1.452 1.887 2.257
AVG ID (IN) 0.526 0.722 0.936 1.255 1.476 1.913 2.290
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.139 0.188 0.276 0.382 0.463 0.641 0.978 SWPS (LBS) 768 1040 1533 2116 2564 2545 5409

SMOOTHWALL SDR & SCHEDULE NOTES

1. Bend Radius
½" through 2 ½" Supported Bend Radius 10 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 20 times the OD 3" through 6" Supported Bend Radius 11 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 22 times the OD 8" through 16" Supported Bend Radius 18 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 27 times the OD

2. During cable placement, large sweeping bends are recommended over tighter bends.

Pre-formed sweeps are recommended for conduit sizes 8" through 16" diameters.

3. SWPS (Safe Working Pull Strength) is calculated using a 25% safety factor with the minimum resin tensile strength of 3,000 psi, the average OD and average wall thickness.

SMOOTHWALL (SCH) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (SIZES 3"-12" NEXT PAGE) (SIZES 3"-12: NEXT PAGE)
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

WALL TYPE
PIPE SIZE 3" 4" 5" 6" 8" 10" 12"
NOM OD (IN) 3.500 4.500 5.563 6.625 8.625 10.750 12.750 OD TOLERENCE +/– 0.018 0.023 0.028 0.033 0.043 0.054 0.064 BEND RADIUS (IN) SUPPORTED 39 50 61 73 155 194 230
BEND RADIUS (IN) UNSUPPORTED 78 100 122 146 233 290 344 SCH-40
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.216 0.237 0.258 0.280 0.322 0.365 0.406 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.026 0.028 0.031 0.034 0.039 0.044 0.049 MIN ID (IN) 3.016 3.970 4.985 5.997 7.903 9.932 11.840
AVG ID (IN) 3.042 3.998 5.016 6.031 7.942 9.976 11.889
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.969 1.380 1.872 2.432 3.661 5.215 6.846 SWPS (LBS) 5348 7618 10320 13395 20158 28580
SCH-80
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.300 0.337 0.375 0.432
WALL TOLERANCE + 0.036 0.040 0.045 0.052
MIN ID (IN) 2.828 3.746 4.723 5.657
AVG ID (IN) 2.864 3.786 4.768 5.709
WEIGHT (#/FT) 1.310 1.914 2.657 3.656
SWPS (LBS) 7238 10578 14669 20172
SMOOTHWALL (SCH) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (SIZES ½"-2½" PREVIOUS PAGE) (SIZES ½"-2½" PREVIOUS PAGE)
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

WALL TYPE
PIPE SIZE ½" ¾" 1" 1 ¼" 1 ½" 2" 2 ½" 3" 4" 6"
MIN ID (IN) 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026 6.065 ID TOLERENCE + 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.020 0.020 ID TOLERENCE – 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.030 0.020 0.035

BEND RADIUS (IN)
SUPPORTED 8 10 13 17 19 24 29 39 50 73

BEND RADIUS (IN)
UNSUPPORTED 16 20 26 34 38 48 58 78 100 146
SIDR-9
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.069 0.092 0.117 0.153 0.230
WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.028
AVG OD (IN) 0.780 1.026 1.298 1.701 2.553
WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.072 0.122 0.192 0.324 0.729
SWPS (LBS) 445 760 1471 1652 4535
SIDR-11.5
MIN. WALL (IN) 0.060 0.072 0.091 0.120 0.140 0.180 0.215 0.267 0.350 0.527 WALL TOLERANCE + 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.022 0.026 0.032 0.042 0.063 AVG OD (IN) 0.762 0.986 1.246 1.635 1.908 2.447 2.919 3.627 4.768 7.175 WEIGHT (#/FT) 0.063 0.096 0.150 0.253 0.341 0.558 0.792 1.225 2.111 4.782 SWPS (LBS) 390 597 891 1,549 2,123 3,468 4,934 7,627 13,119 29,750 SMOOTHWALL SIDR NOTES:

1. Bend Radius ½” through 2 ½”
Supported Bend Radius 10 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 20 times the OD 3” through 6” Supported Bend Radius 11 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 22 times the OD 8” through 16” Supported Bend Radius 18 times the OD Unsupported Bend Radius 27 times the OD

2. During cable placement, large sweeping bends are recommended over tighter bends.

Pre-formed sweeps are recommended for conduit sizes 8” through 16” diameters.

3. SWPS (Safe Working Pull Strength) is calculated using a 25% safety factor with the minimum resin tensile strength of 3,000 psi, the average OD and average wall thickness.

4. Internal or external ribs are in addition to the average wall and for determining OD and ID dimensions.

The average rib height to be added is 0.020”

5. Add 0.016 #/ft for ribbed products 1 1/2” and less. For 2” and larger, add 0.025 #/ft

SMOOTHWALL (SIDR) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
+1 800 847 7661
WWW.DURALINE.COM
DL.SMOOTHWALL.5.2020

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Dry core, Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY 144B1 (24F/tube)
250um fiber
Prepared by Songjie Xue Approved by Pengxiang Yin

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 250±10μm
(Included color layer) 250±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
144 24 6 0.5 7.8±0.3 50
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 1.0mm.

Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 700N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-40oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826

3.7 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
13 Blue with black ring
14 Orange with black ring
15 Green with black ring
16 Brown with black ring
17 Grey with black ring
18 White with black ring
19 Red with black ring
20 Natural with black ring
21 Yellow with black ring
22 Violet with black ring
23 Pink with black ring
24 Aqua with black ring

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2020100826
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube Color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY 12F/tube
Prepared by Songjie Xue Approved by Pengxiang Yin

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 245±10μm
(Included color layer) 250±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section
48 cores
Fiber
Jelly
PBT
Water-blocking yarn
FRP
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
2-72 12 6 0.55 6.0±0.3 30
96 12 8 0.55 7.0±0.3 47
288 12 24 0.55 9.5±0.4 84
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 0.3mm.

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 600N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-40oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071301

3.7 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Dry core, Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY 12F/tube
250um
Prepared by Xin Zhang Approved by Pengxiang Yin

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 245±10μm
(Included color layer) 250±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section
48 cores
Fiber
Jelly
PBT
Water-blocking yarn
FRP
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
2-72 12 6 0.50 6.0±0.3 30
96 12 8 0.50 7.0±0.3 47
144 12 12 0.50 9.0±0.3 73
192 12 18 0.50 9.2±0.5 74
288 12 24 0.50 10.9±0.5 104
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 0.3mm.

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 600N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-20
oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071602

3.7 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Dry core, Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY 24F/tube
250um

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 245±10μm
(Included color layer) 250±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
144 24 6 0.50 7.5±0.3 49
192 24 8 0.50 8.8±0.5 69
288 24 12 0.50 11.6±0.5 118
432 24 18 0.50 11.9±0.5 125
576 24 24 0.50 13.7±0.5 161
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 0.3mm.

Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 600N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-20
oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

3.4 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
13 Blue with black ring
14 Orange with black ring
15 Green with black ring
16 Brown with black ring
17 Grey with black ring
18 White with black ring
19 Red with black ring
20 Natural with black ring
21 Yellow with black ring
22 Violet with black ring
23 Pink with black ring
24 Aqua with black ring

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Dry core, Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY 24F/tube
Prepared by Xin Zhang Approved by Pengxiang Yin

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 245±10μm
(Included color layer) 250±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
288 24 12 0.55 11.6±0.5 118
432 24 18 0.55 11.9±0.5 125
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 0.3mm.

Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 600N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-20
oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603

3.4 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
13 Blue with black ring
14 Orange with black ring
15 Green with black ring
16 Brown with black ring
17 Grey with black ring
18 White with black ring
19 Red with black ring
20 Natural with black ring
21 Yellow with black ring
22 Violet with black ring
23 Pink with black ring
24 Aqua with black ring

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071603
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604

SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
Loose tube, all dielectric,
Dry core, Micro air blown cable
GCYFTY
200um fiber

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604

1. General

1.1 This specification covers the requirements for the supply of single-mode optical fiber cables.

1.2 The single mode optical fiber cables comply with the requirements of this specification and generally meet any latest relevant ITU-T Recommendation G.652D.

2. Fiber characteristics

2.1 G.652D

2.1.1 Geometric characteristics
Item Construction
Mode field diameter At 1310nm 9.2±0.4μm
Cladding diameter 125±1.0μm
Core concentricity error ≤0.7μm
Cladding non-circularity ≤1.0%
Cut-off wavelength (λcc) (for cable) ≤1260nm
Cut-off wavelength (λc) (for fiber) 1180nm~1330nm
Primary coating diameter
(Not included color layer) 200±10μm
(Included color layer) 205±15μm
Coating-cladding concentricity error ≤12.5μm
Fiber curl radius ≥4m

2.1.2 Transmission characteristics
Item Performance
Attenuation
At 1310nm ≤0.36dB/km
At 1550nm ≤0.25dB/km
Macro bending loss Φ=60mm, 100turns at 1550nm ≤0.1dB
Chromatic dispersion
Within 1288~1339nm ≤3.5ps/nm·km
At 1550nm ≤18ps/nm·km
Zero dispersion wavelength 1300~1324nm
Zero dispersion slope ≤0.092ps/nm2·km

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604
3 Optical Fiber Cable

3.1 Cross section
144 cores
192 cores
Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
Ripcord
HDPE outer sheath
Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
PE outer sheath
Ripcord

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604
216 cores

3.2 Dimension of the cable
Amount of
fiber
Max. no. of the
fiber per tube
No. of tube
positions
*Nom. thickness
of sheath
Diameter
(Appr.)
Weight
(Appr.)
mm mm Kg/km
96 24 6 0.5 6.4±0.3 36
144 24 6 0.5 6.4±0.3 36
192 24 8 0.5 7.4±0.3 55
216 24 9 0.5 7.9±0.3 85
288 24 12 0.5 9.4±0.3 88
432 24 18 0.50 10.2±0.5 93
576 24 24 0.50 11.9±0.5 130
*Note：The minimum thickness of the sheath is 0.3mm.

Fiber
Jelly
PBT
FRP
Water blocking yarn
PE outer sheath
Ripcord

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604

3.3 Performance

NO ITEM TEST METHOD SPECIFICATION
1 Tensile performance
IEC60794-1-21-E1
- Load: 600N
- Time: 5 minutes
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 nm (after test)
- Fiber strain  0.6 %
- No sheath damage
2 Crush test
IEC60794-1-21-E3
- Load: 1000 N /100mm
- Time: 1 minute
- Length: 100 mm
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
3 Impact test
IEC60794-1-21-E4
- Impact hight:1m
- Impact weight: 300g
- Points of impacts: 3
- Impacts per point: 1
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
4 Repeated bending
IEC60794-1-21-E6
- Bending radius: 20 × D
- Load: 5kg
- Flexing rate: 3sec/cycle
- No. of cycle: ≥35
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
5 Water penetration
IEC60794-1-22-F5B
- Height of water: 1m
- Sample length: 3 m
- Time: 24 hr
- No drip through the cable core
assembly
6 Twist / Torsion
IEC60794-1-21-E7
- Length: 1 m
- Load: 100N
- Twist rate: 6sec/cycle
- Twist angle: ±180°
- No. of cycle: 10
- No fiber degradation
- No sheath damage
7 Temperature
Cycling
IEC60794-1-22-F1
- Temperature step:
+20oC→-20
oC→+70oC→+20oC
- Number of cycle: 2 turns
- Time per each step: 12 hrs
- Loss change  0.05 dB
@1550 (90%)
- Loss change  0.15 dB
@1550 (100%)
- No sheath damage
D*: Cable diameter

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604

3.7 Color Coding of Loose Tubes and Fibers
Fiber color code
Position Fiber color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua
13 Blue with black ring
14 Orange with black ring
15 Green with black ring
16 Brown with black ring
17 Grey with black ring
18 White with black ring
19 Red with black ring
20 Natural with black ring
21 Yellow with black ring
22 Violet with black ring
23 Pink with black ring
24 Aqua with black ring

Vocom-Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021071604
Color codes for Loose Tube
Position Loose Tube Color
1 Blue
2 Orange
3 Green
4 Brown
5 Grey
6 White
7 Red
8 Black
9 Yellow
10 Violet
11 Pink
12 Aqua

4. Sheath Marking
Manufacturer Cable type Manufacturing year ID Length marking in feet or meter

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021072802
1 SPECIFICATION
Optical Fiber Cable
GYFS
Gel-Free, Single-Jacket,
Single-Armored Cables, 2-864 Fibers
Prepared by Xin Zhang Approved by Yin Pengxiang

Nanjing Wasin Fujikura Optical Communication Ltd.

SPEC.No: 2021072802
2 Nanjing Wasin Fujikura G.652D fiber complies with or exceeds the ITU-T Recommendation G.652D, the IEC60793-2-50 type B1.3 and the TIA-472E000 type IVa Optical Fiber Specification.

Nanjing Wasin FujikuraG.657A1 fiber complies with or exceeds the ITU-T Recommendation G.657A1, the IEC60793-2-50 type B6a1.

1. Product description
GYFS is gel-free, single-jacket, single-armored cable for direct burial, duct and aerial. GYFS is from 2-count to 432-count suitable for a variety of system configurations. The loose tube is freeing the fiber from environmental hazards to ensure a high transmission reliability and quality.

Gel-free indicates there are water-blocking yarns in the loose tubes and water-blocking tape under the armored layer, meaning no mess or cleanup. The structure of cable is additionally reinforced with the single armor: corrugated steel tape, which has extra protection against crush and rodent.

GYFS is easy to strip with two ripcords under the armored layer. The jacket is rugged and durable medium density polyethylene.

2. Features and Benefits

2.1 High transmission reliability and quality

2.2 Gel-free: no mess or cleanup

2.3 Single armored: extra protection against crush and rodent

2.4 Ripcords: easy to strip; cause no unevenness of the jacket

2.5 Medium density polyethylene jacket: rugged and durable