LA MESA CITY COUNCIL AND CITY OF LA MESA SUCCESSOR AGENCY AGENDA
A Regular Meeting of the City Council and a Special Meeting of the City of La Mesa Successor Agency
Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2024, 6:00 p.m.
Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:
Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Colin Parent
Councilmember Jack Shu
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region),the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.us), Facebook Live (www.facebook.com/lamesaca) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:
The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:
Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.
Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot by combined or yielded to another speaker. *Live Remote Public Comment ONLY permitted during Councilmember teleconferencing pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953 (AB 2449).
*Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.
Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Administrative Services Department 48 hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].
Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo i.d. or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.
Pages
1. CALL TO ORDER
1.1 INVOCATION - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. PRESENTATION
5.1 PRESENTATION RECOGNIZING OUTGOING COUNCILMEMBERS
COLIN PARENT AND JACK SHU, FOR THEIR SERVICE TO THE CITY
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.
If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.
7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
8. ELECTION RESULTS
8.1 DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE NOVEMBER 5, 2024, GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
7 a. CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT OF VOTE FOR THE NOVEMBER
5, 2024, GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
Recommended Motion:
The City Clerk read the Statement of Vote into the record.
b. ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE
FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON
NOVEMBER 5, 2024, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH
OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
c. FIVE MINUTE RECESS FOR THE TRANSITION OF THE
OUTGOING AND INCOMING COUNCILMEMBERS
d. INSTALLATION OF COUNCILMEMBERS
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
(Items 10.1 through 10.7)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
Recommended Motion:
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.7.
10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT
OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2024
24 Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.3 RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFP 25-11 FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES TO HUB INTERNATIONAL
31 Staff Reference: Mr. Munzenmaier
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.4 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE FORD F-150
LIGHTNING FOR THE COMMUNITY CLEANUP COORDINATOR TO
SEDANO FORD
49 Staff Reference: Mr. Munzenmaier
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.5 PUBLIC WORKS SOLAR PANEL AND BATTERY STORAGE
PROJECT FUNDING
54 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDS
THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD AB102
GRANT PROGRAM FROM THE BUDGET ACT OF 2023/24 TO FUND
THE PUBLIC WORKS SOLAR PANEL AND BATTERY STORAGE
PROJECT, AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING
FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO
EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENTS FOR THE
PROJECT
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.6 RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT TO BWE, INC. FOR ROADWAY AND SITE DESIGN
SERVICES FOR THE TOWER STREET MOBILITY ACCESS
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
59 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.7 RESOLUTION AWARDING SECOND RENEWAL OPTION OF
ANNUAL CONTRACT INCLUDING CPI INCREASE FOR 2024
ANNUAL CONCRETE MAINTENANCE PROJECT, BID 23-04, TO
PORTILLO CONCRETE, INC.
67 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
(Items 11.1 through 11.2)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Successor Agency or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
Recommended Motion:
Approve Consent Calendar Items 11.1 through 11.2.
11.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT
OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
11.2 RESOLUTIONS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
79 Staff Reference: Ms. Royales
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1,
2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26 PERIOD) AND
APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS
25-26) FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM
JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 AND APPROVING
RELATED ACTIONS
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
12. STAFF REPORT - CITY COUNCIL
12.1 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING A COUNCILMEMBER AS THE
INTERIM SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER REPRESENTATIVE TO
TAKE PART IN THE DECEMBER 12, 2024, SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY
POWER BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
99 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:
The Mayor, with City Council approval, appoint an interim representative to the San Diego Community Power Board of Directors to take part in its December 12, 2024, meeting.
13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
16. ADJOURNMENT
DATE: December 10, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CITY CLERK’S STATEMENT OF THE VOTE; ADOPTION OF
RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT AND DECLARING THE RESULT
OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5,
2024; AND INSTALLATION OF COUNCILMEMBERS
Attached is the City Clerk’s Statement of the Vote that will be read aloud and entered into the minutes, and a Resolution reciting the fact and declaring the result of the election.
Staff recommends the Council adopt the attached Resolution, followed by the installation of the Councilmembers.
Attachments
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT OF VOTE
NOVEMBER 5, 2024 GENERAL ELECTION
The following statement shall be entered into the minutes:
I, Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, County of San Diego, State of California, do hereby state as follows:
1. The number of ballots cast in the City was 30,251.
2. The names of the persons voted for and the office for which each person was voted for are as follows:
Member of the City Council:
Shawn Townsend
Kristine C. Alessio
Lauren Cazares
Genevieve Suzuki
3. The measure voted upon is as follows:
Measure L, Measure Protecting La Mesa Essential Services Without Increasing Tax Rates. To continue funding for La Mesa city services, such as keeping parks/ recreation/ community facilities safe, clean and well maintained; fixing potholes/ maintaining streets; and providing rapid 9-1-1 emergency response/ fire protection/ paramedics/ crime prevention, shall the ordinance renewing City of La Mesa's existing ¾% sales tax be adopted at the current rate (no increase), continuing $12,000,000 annually for 20 years, with independent oversight, audits, and all funds locally controlled?
4. The number of votes given at each precinct to each person is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
5. The number of votes given in the City to each person is as follows:
Member of the City Council Total Votes
Lauren Cazares 12,587
Genevieve Suzuki 11,984
Kristine C. Alessio 11,238
Shawn Townsend 3,253
6. The number of votes given to Measure V is as follows:
Measure L Total Votes
Yes 23,073
No 5,284
Dated: December 10, 2024 Megan Wiegelman, CMC
City Clerk
City of La Mesa
(SEAL OF CITY)
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND
SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of La Mesa, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, as required by law; WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2280 adopted January 26, 1982, the election was consolidated with the Statewide general election and the Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A."
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That there were 31 voting precincts established for the purpose of holding the election consisting of the regular election precincts in the City as established for the holding of state and county elections.
SECTION 2. That the whole number of ballots cast in the City was 30,251.
SECTION 3. That the General Municipal Election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of the City as required by laws relating to cities in the State of California, to wit:
Two Members of the City Council of the City for full terms of four years.
SECTION 4. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows:
Shawn Townsend
Kristine C. Alessio
Lauren Cazares
Genevieve Suzuki
SECTION 5. That the measure voted upon at the election is as follows:
Measure L - Measure Protecting La Mesa Essential Services Without Increasing Tax Rates. To continue funding for La Mesa city services, such as keeping parks/ recreation/ community facilities safe, clean and well maintained; fixing potholes/ maintaining streets; and providing rapid 9-1-1 emergency response/ fire protection/ paramedics/ crime prevention, shall the ordinance
2 renewing City of La Mesa's existing ¾% sales tax be adopted at the current rate (no increase), continuing $12,000,000 annually for 20 years, with independent oversight, audits, and all funds locally controlled?
SECTION 6. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against the measure, are as listed in “Exhibit A” attached.
SECTION 7. The City Council does declare and determine that:
Lauren Cazares was elected as Member of the City Council of the City for the full term of four years;
Genevieve Suzuki was elected as Member of the City Council of the City for the full term of four years;
That as a result of the election, a majority of the voters voting on Measure L did vote in favor of it and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified; and
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall enter in the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election, showing: 1) the whole number of ballots cast in the City; 2) the names of the persons voted for; 3) the measure voted upon; 4) for what office each person was voted for; 5) the number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against the measure; and 6) the total number of votes given to each person, and for and against the measure.
SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and duly authenticated; that the City Clerk or designee shall administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected.
SECTION 10. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California held the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
County Operations Center Campus
5600 Overland Avenue, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92123-1278 Telephone: (858) 565-5800 Toll-free: 1 (800) 696-0136 TTY / TDD: (800) 735-2929 Facsimile: (858) 505-7294 Web Address: www.sdvote.com
CYNTHIA L. PAES
Registrar of Voters
SHAWN K. BROM Assistant Registrar of Voters
December 3, 2024
TO: Andrew Potter
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
FROM: Cynthia L. Paes
Registrar of Voters
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 2024, CERTIFICATION Enclosed are the certified results for the following election:
Jurisdiction: Statewide General Election
Election Date: November 5, 2024
Please contact my staff at (858) 505-7210 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Enclosure: Election Results
c: Supervisor Nora Vargas, Chair
Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer, Vice Chair
Supervisor Joel Anderson
Supervisor Monica Montgomery Steppe
Supervisor Jim Desmond
Ebony N. Shelton, Chief Administrative Officer
Caroline Smith, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer
Brian Albright, Deputy CAO, Finance & General Government Group County Board of Education
LUEG, Community Groups
Continued:
Incorporated Cities:
Carlsbad
Chula Vista
Coronado
Del Mar
El Cajon
Encinitas
Escondido
Imperial Beach
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
Poway
San Diego
San Marcos
Santee
Vista
Community College Districts:
Grossmont-Cuyamaca
MiraCosta
Palomar
San Diego
Southwestern
Unified School Districts:
Bonsall
Borrego Springs
Carlsbad
Coronado
Oceanside
Poway
Ramona
San Diego
San Marcos
Valley Center-Pauma
Vista
Warner
High School Districts:
Escondido
Fallbrook
Grossmont
Julian
San Dieguito
Sweetwater
Union/Elementary School Districts:
Alpine
Cajon Valley
Cardiff
Chula Vista
Del Mar
Dehesa
Encinitas
Escondido
Fallbrook
Lakeside
Lemon Grove
National
Rancho Santa Fe
San Ysidro
Santee
South Bay
Special Districts:
Borrego Water
Canebrake County Water
Fallbrook Community Planning Group
Grossmont Healthcare
Helix Water
Lakeside Fire Protection
Lakeside Water
Morro Hills Community Services
North County Fire Protection
Olivenhain Municipal Water
Otay Water
Padre Dam Municipal Water
Palomar Health
Pauma Valley Community Services
Rainbow Municipal Water
Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection
South Bay Water
Sweetwater Community Planning Group
Tri-City Healthcare
Vallecitos Water
Valley Center Community Planning Group
Vista Fire Protection
Vista Irrigation
CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 1
LUKE SHAFFER 5,329 57.00%
ALLISON BLACKWELL 4,020 43.00%
Total 9,349
CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 2
JIM O'HARA 4,109 55.47%
DESTINY PRESTON 3,298 44.53%
Total 7,407
CITY OF ESCONDIDO MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 3
CHRISTIAN GARCIA 5,594 60.94%
VERONICA CIGARROA 2,513 27.37%
CHRISTINE SPENCER 1,073 11.69%
Total 9,180
CITY OF ESCONDIDO MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 4
JUDY FITZGERALD 10,190 68.42%
RODERICK "ROD" HOWELL 4,704 31.58%
Total 14,894
CITY OF ESCONDIDO TREASURER
DOUGLAS W. SHULTZ 40,680 100.00%
Total 40,680
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 2
JOHN "JACK" FISHER 1,076 42.56%
MARTIN "MARTY" MATTES 799 31.61%
BEN SWEARINGEN 653 25.83%
Total 2,528
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 4
MATTHEW LEYBA-GONZALEZ 1,061 68.28%
LINDA KAYE 493 31.72%
Total 1,554
CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
Vote For 2
LAUREN CAZARES 12,587 32.22%
GENEVIEVE SUZUKI 11,984 30.68%
KRISTINE C. ALESSIO 11,238 28.77%
SHAWN TOWNSEND 3,253 8.33%
Total 39,062
CITY OF LEMON GROVE MAYOR
ALYSSON SNOW 4,059 39.77%
LIANA LEBARON 3,087 30.25%
RACQUEL VASQUEZ 3,059 29.98%
Total 10,205
CITY OF LEMON GROVE MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
Vote For 2
JESSYKA HEREDIA 4,494 29.13%
SITIVI "STEVE" FAIAI 4,051 26.26%
GEORGE GASTIL 3,757 24.35%
SETH SMITH 3,127 20.27%
Total 15,429
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 2
JOSE RODRIGUEZ 2,578 73.32%
RANDI CASTLE-SALGADO 938 26.68%
Total 3,516
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 4
MARCUS BUSH 1,736 43.77%
VICTOR M. ARREOLA 1,509 38.05%
DANIEL PEREZ 721 18.18%
Total 3,966
CITY OF OCEANSIDE MAYOR
ESTHER SANCHEZ 39,100 50.15%
RYAN KEIM 38,868 49.85%
Total 77,968
CITY OF OCEANSIDE MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 3
JIMMY FIGUEROA 10,250 47.53%
LAURA BASSETT 8,804 40.82%
TOM DEMOOY 1,679 7.79%
AUSTIN SORENSEN 833 3.86%
Total 21,566
CITY OF OCEANSIDE MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
DISTRICT NO. 4
PETER WEISS 8,995 45.15%
AMBER KAE NIUATOA 5,810 29.16%
OMAR HASHIMI 5,119 25.69%
Total 19,924
CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY CLERK
ZEB NAVARRO 62,004 100.00%
Total 62,004
Printed: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 12:47 PM Page 7 of 14 Presidential General Election
County of San Diego
November 5, 2024
Official Results
(San Diego Portion Only)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - MEASURE G - MajorityRequired to pass NO 701,639 50.46%
YES 688,922 49.54%
Total 1,390,561
CITY OF CARLSBAD - MEASURE B - Majority-Required
to pass
YES 32,759 53.06%
NO 28,981 46.94%
Total 61,740
CITY OF CHULA VISTA - MEASURE P - MajorityRequired to pass YES 81,009 73.40%
NO 29,361 26.60%
Total 110,370
CITY OF DEL MAR - MEASURE M - Majority-Required
to pass
YES 1,866 71.52%
NO 743 28.48%
Total 2,609
CITY OF DEL MAR - MEASURE A - Majority-Required to
pass
YES 1,652 66.24%
NO 842 33.76%
Total 2,494
CITY OF EL CAJON - MEASURE J - Majority-Required
to pass
YES 22,631 67.97%
NO 10,663 32.03%
Total 33,294
CITY OF ENCINITAS - MEASURE K - Majority-Required
to pass
NO 18,884 51.91%
YES 17,492 48.09%
Total 36,376
CITY OF ESCONDIDO - MEASURE I - MajorityRequired to pass YES 32,802 61.12%
NO 20,863 38.88%
Total 53,665
CITY OF LA MESA - MEASURE L - Majority-Required to
pass
YES 23,073 81.37%
NO 5,284 18.63%
Total 28,357
CITY OF LEMON GROVE - MEASURE T - MajorityRequired to pass YES 7,503 71.59%
NO 2,977 28.41%
Total 10,480
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - MEASURE R - MajorityRequired to pass NO 10,145 66.15%
YES 5,192 33.85%
Total 15,337
CITY OF OCEANSIDE - MEASURE X - MajorityRequired to pass YES 55,360 69.67%
NO 24,104 30.33%
Total 79,464
CITY OF POWAY - MEASURE H - Majority-Required to
pass
NO 17,880 68.66%
YES 8,163 31.34%
Total 26,043
CITY OF SAN DIEGO - MEASURE C - MajorityRequired to pass YES 264,086 67.47%
NO 127,314 32.53%
Total 391,400
CITY OF SAN DIEGO - MEASURE D - MajorityRequired to pass YES 375,039 72.32%
NO 143,549 27.68%
Total 518,588
CITY OF SAN DIEGO - MEASURE E - Majority-Required
to pass
NO 288,446 50.31%
YES 284,940 49.69%
Total 573,386
Printed: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 12:47 PM Page 12 of 14 Presidential General Election
County of San Diego
November 5, 2024
Official Results
(San Diego Portion Only)
1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) SHAWN TOWNSEND KRISTINE C. ALESSIO LAUREN CAZARES
GENEVIEVE
SUZUKI
1458-481200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1611 107 6.64 % 24 44 30 41 1458-481200-LA MESA Mail 1611 1221 75.79 % 110 445 518 511 1458-481200-LA MESA Total 1611 1328 82.43 % 134 489 548 552 1459-481500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1163 119 10.23 % 27 62 27 37 1459-481500-LA MESA Mail 1163 868 74.63 % 77 347 368 320 1459-481500-LA MESA Total 1163 987 84.87 % 104 409 395 357 1460-481800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1546 202 13.07 % 41 101 49 60 1460-481800-LA MESA Mail 1546 1002 64.81 % 89 422 391 370 1460-481800-LA MESA Total 1546 1204 77.88 % 130 523 440 430 1461-482100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1319 141 10.69 % 18 76 29 54 1461-482100-LA MESA Mail 1319 951 72.10 % 86 374 414 355 1461-482100-LA MESA Total 1319 1092 82.79 % 104 450 443 409 1462-482400-LA MESA Vote Centers 1565 207 13.23 % 35 87 62 78 1462-482400-LA MESA Mail 1565 1053 67.28 % 87 391 420 393 1462-482400-LA MESA Total 1565 1260 80.51 % 122 478 482 471 1463-482500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1272 166 13.05 % 32 75 50 66 1463-482500-LA MESA Mail 1272 825 64.86 % 75 275 359 314 1463-482500-LA MESA Total 1272 991 77.91 % 107 350 409 380 1464-482700-LA MESA Vote Centers 1061 147 13.85 % 28 62 51 53 1464-482700-LA MESA Mail 1061 677 63.81 % 47 260 269 247 1464-482700-LA MESA Total 1061 824 77.66 % 75 322 320 300 1465-482800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1248 152 12.18 % 29 63 37 50 1465-482800-LA MESA Mail 1248 833 66.75 % 79 269 343 329 1465-482800-LA MESA Total 1248 985 78.93 % 108 332 380 379 1466-483100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1391 140 10.06 % 33 68 42 40 1466-483100-LA MESA Mail 1391 999 71.82 % 90 373 425 396 1466-483100-LA MESA Total 1391 1139 81.88 % 123 441 467 436 1467-483200-LA MESA Vote Centers 41 2 4.88 %
1467-483200-LA MESA Mail 41 32 78.05 % 5 8 12 15
1467-483200-LA MESA Total 41 34 82.93 % 5 8 12 15
1468-483300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1510 206 13.64 % 37 78 58 63 1468-483300-LA MESA Mail 1510 1019 67.48 % 102 350 436 415 1468-483300-LA MESA Total 1510 1225 81.13 % 139 428 494 478 1469-483600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1356 194 14.31 % 47 76 60 72 1469-483600-LA MESA Mail 1356 858 63.27 % 80 279 375 362 1469-483600-LA MESA Total 1356 1052 77.58 % 127 355 435 434 1470-483700-LA MESA Vote Centers 1175 140 11.91 % 34 62 38 39 1470-483700-LA MESA Mail 1175 816 69.45 % 79 266 352 312 1470-483700-LA MESA Total 1175 956 81.36 % 113 328 390 351 1471-484220-LA MESA Vote Centers 1445 158 10.93 % 34 64 56 62 1471-484220-LA MESA Mail 1445 840 58.13 % 93 279 343 290 1471-484220-LA MESA Total 1445 998 69.07 % 127 343 399 352 1472-484800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1258 132 10.49 % 18 65 38 47 1472-484800-LA MESA Mail 1258 876 69.63 % 69 322 377 328 1472-484800-LA MESA Total 1258 1008 80.13 % 87 387 415 375 1473-484900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1348 141 10.46 % 31 66 45 52 1473-484900-LA MESA Mail 1348 946 70.18 % 101 291 427 415 1473-484900-LA MESA Total 1348 1087 80.64 % 132 357 472 467 1474-484910-LA MESA Vote Centers 1311 120 9.15 % 18 47 51 49 1474-484910-LA MESA Mail 1311 933 71.17 % 74 321 423 409 Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 1 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) SHAWN TOWNSEND KRISTINE C. ALESSIO LAUREN CAZARES
GENEVIEVE
SUZUKI
1474-484910-LA MESA Total 1311 1053 80.32 % 92 368 474 458 1475-485000-LA MESA Vote Centers 1122 131 11.68 % 23 58 42 45 1475-485000-LA MESA Mail 1122 779 69.43 % 79 260 381 311 1475-485000-LA MESA Total 1122 910 81.11 % 102 318 423 356 1476-485200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1546 159 10.28 % 40 79 48 45 1476-485200-LA MESA Mail 1546 1094 70.76 % 102 392 490 451 1476-485200-LA MESA Total 1546 1253 81.05 % 142 471 538 496 1477-485300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1183 101 8.54 % 21 47 28 28 1477-485300-LA MESA Mail 1183 858 72.53 % 101 306 403 334 1477-485300-LA MESA Total 1183 959 81.07 % 122 353 431 362 1478-485600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1142 83 7.27 % 17 42 27 26 1478-485600-LA MESA Mail 1142 882 77.23 % 74 375 364 330 1478-485600-LA MESA Total 1142 965 84.50 % 91 417 391 356 1479-485610-LA MESA Vote Centers 0 0
1479-485610-LA MESA Mail 0 0
1479-485610-LA MESA Total 0 0
1480-485620-LA MESA Vote Centers 4 2 50.00 % 2 2
1480-485620-LA MESA Mail 4 1 25.00 % 1 1
1480-485620-LA MESA Total 4 3 75.00 % 1 2 3
1481-485800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1514 140 9.25 % 13 70 48 55 1481-485800-LA MESA Mail 1514 996 65.79 % 85 406 442 421 1481-485800-LA MESA Total 1514 1136 75.03 % 98 476 490 476 1482-485900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1262 124 9.83 % 32 55 43 42 1482-485900-LA MESA Mail 1262 880 69.73 % 62 316 419 384 1482-485900-LA MESA Total 1262 1004 79.56 % 94 371 462 426 1483-486300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1496 105 7.02 % 23 45 31 36 1483-486300-LA MESA Mail 1496 1149 76.80 % 129 387 500 561 1483-486300-LA MESA Total 1496 1254 83.82 % 152 432 531 597 1484-486500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1494 143 9.57 % 28 60 45 54 1484-486500-LA MESA Mail 1494 908 60.78 % 99 317 392 370 1484-486500-LA MESA Total 1494 1051 70.35 % 127 377 437 424 1485-486800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1561 135 8.65 % 19 56 53 60 1485-486800-LA MESA Mail 1561 1064 68.16 % 91 412 446 386 1485-486800-LA MESA Total 1561 1199 76.81 % 110 468 499 446 1486-487010-LA MESA Vote Centers 1101 113 10.26 % 20 63 34 39 1486-487010-LA MESA Mail 1101 737 66.94 % 79 250 297 304 1486-487010-LA MESA Total 1101 850 77.20 % 99 313 331 343 1487-487030-LA MESA Vote Centers 1602 158 9.86 % 37 73 65 63 1487-487030-LA MESA Mail 1602 941 58.74 % 97 336 366 365 1487-487030-LA MESA Total 1602 1099 68.60 % 134 409 431 428 1488-487090-LA MESA Vote Centers 1703 140 8.22 % 36 70 55 58 1488-487090-LA MESA Mail 1703 1204 70.70 % 117 394 591 568 1488-487090-LA MESA Total 1703 1344 78.92 % 153 464 646 626 8062-999062-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8062-999062-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8062-999062-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8629-999629-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 2 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) SHAWN TOWNSEND KRISTINE C. ALESSIO LAUREN CAZARES
GENEVIEVE
SUZUKI
8629-999629-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8629-999629-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8630-999630-VBM-AV Vote Centers 1 0 0.00 %
8630-999630-VBM-AV Mail 1 1 100.00 % 1
8630-999630-VBM-AV Total 1 1 100.00 % 1
8631-999631-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8631-999631-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8631-999631-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8632-999632-VBM-AV Vote Centers 2 0 0.00 %
8632-999632-VBM-AV Mail 2 0 0.00 %
8632-999632-VBM-AV Total 2 0 0.00 %
Total - Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 795 1814 1244 1416 Total - Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 2458 9424 11343 10568
Contest Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 3253 11238 12587 11984 Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 3 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA - MEASURE L
- Majority-Required to pass Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) YES
NO
1458-481200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1611 107 6.64 % 82 14
1458-481200-LA MESA Mail 1611 1221 75.79 % 942 207
1458-481200-LA MESA Total 1611 1328 82.43 % 1024 221
1459-481500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1163 119 10.23 % 92 18 1459-481500-LA MESA Mail 1163 868 74.63 % 648 166
1459-481500-LA MESA Total 1163 987 84.87 % 740 184
1460-481800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1546 202 13.07 % 151 32 1460-481800-LA MESA Mail 1546 1002 64.81 % 749 199
1460-481800-LA MESA Total 1546 1204 77.88 % 900 231
1461-482100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1319 141 10.69 % 99 31 1461-482100-LA MESA Mail 1319 951 72.10 % 675 222
1461-482100-LA MESA Total 1319 1092 82.79 % 774 253
1462-482400-LA MESA Vote Centers 1565 207 13.23 % 160 23 1462-482400-LA MESA Mail 1565 1053 67.28 % 793 193
1462-482400-LA MESA Total 1565 1260 80.51 % 953 216
1463-482500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1272 166 13.05 % 132 23 1463-482500-LA MESA Mail 1272 825 64.86 % 624 149
1463-482500-LA MESA Total 1272 991 77.91 % 756 172
1464-482700-LA MESA Vote Centers 1061 147 13.85 % 110 22 1464-482700-LA MESA Mail 1061 677 63.81 % 502 131
1464-482700-LA MESA Total 1061 824 77.66 % 612 153
1465-482800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1248 152 12.18 % 109 25 1465-482800-LA MESA Mail 1248 833 66.75 % 639 137
1465-482800-LA MESA Total 1248 985 78.93 % 748 162
1466-483100-LA MESA Vote Centers 1391 140 10.06 % 100 27 1466-483100-LA MESA Mail 1391 999 71.82 % 784 163
1466-483100-LA MESA Total 1391 1139 81.88 % 884 190
1467-483200-LA MESA Vote Centers 41 2 4.88 %
1467-483200-LA MESA Mail 41 32 78.05 % 26 3
1467-483200-LA MESA Total 41 34 82.93 % 26 3
1468-483300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1510 206 13.64 % 140 30 1468-483300-LA MESA Mail 1510 1019 67.48 % 778 189
1468-483300-LA MESA Total 1510 1225 81.13 % 918 219
1469-483600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1356 194 14.31 % 154 18 1469-483600-LA MESA Mail 1356 858 63.27 % 679 126
1469-483600-LA MESA Total 1356 1052 77.58 % 833 144
1470-483700-LA MESA Vote Centers 1175 140 11.91 % 100 27 1470-483700-LA MESA Mail 1175 816 69.45 % 606 139
1470-483700-LA MESA Total 1175 956 81.36 % 706 166
1471-484220-LA MESA Vote Centers 1445 158 10.93 % 130 13 1471-484220-LA MESA Mail 1445 840 58.13 % 653 136
1471-484220-LA MESA Total 1445 998 69.07 % 783 149
1472-484800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1258 132 10.49 % 100 22 1472-484800-LA MESA Mail 1258 876 69.63 % 675 162
1472-484800-LA MESA Total 1258 1008 80.13 % 775 184
1473-484900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1348 141 10.46 % 115 15 1473-484900-LA MESA Mail 1348 946 70.18 % 725 163
1473-484900-LA MESA Total 1348 1087 80.64 % 840 178
1474-484910-LA MESA Vote Centers 1311 120 9.15 % 92 16
1474-484910-LA MESA Mail 1311 933 71.17 % 748 135
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 4 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA - MEASURE L
- Majority-Required to pass Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) YES
NO
1474-484910-LA MESA Total 1311 1053 80.32 % 840 151
1475-485000-LA MESA Vote Centers 1122 131 11.68 % 102 10 1475-485000-LA MESA Mail 1122 779 69.43 % 611 114
1475-485000-LA MESA Total 1122 910 81.11 % 713 124
1476-485200-LA MESA Vote Centers 1546 159 10.28 % 115 34 1476-485200-LA MESA Mail 1546 1094 70.76 % 841 194
1476-485200-LA MESA Total 1546 1253 81.05 % 956 228
1477-485300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1183 101 8.54 % 74 21
1477-485300-LA MESA Mail 1183 858 72.53 % 654 167
1477-485300-LA MESA Total 1183 959 81.07 % 728 188
1478-485600-LA MESA Vote Centers 1142 83 7.27 % 61 20
1478-485600-LA MESA Mail 1142 882 77.23 % 615 219
1478-485600-LA MESA Total 1142 965 84.50 % 676 239
1479-485610-LA MESA Vote Centers 0 0
1479-485610-LA MESA Mail 0 0
1479-485610-LA MESA Total 0 0
1480-485620-LA MESA Vote Centers 4 2 50.00 % 2
1480-485620-LA MESA Mail 4 1 25.00 % 1
1480-485620-LA MESA Total 4 3 75.00 % 3
1481-485800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1514 140 9.25 % 103 22 1481-485800-LA MESA Mail 1514 996 65.79 % 775 179
1481-485800-LA MESA Total 1514 1136 75.03 % 878 201
1482-485900-LA MESA Vote Centers 1262 124 9.83 % 97 20
1482-485900-LA MESA Mail 1262 880 69.73 % 681 140
1482-485900-LA MESA Total 1262 1004 79.56 % 778 160
1483-486300-LA MESA Vote Centers 1496 105 7.02 % 81 15
1483-486300-LA MESA Mail 1496 1149 76.80 % 906 185
1483-486300-LA MESA Total 1496 1254 83.82 % 987 200
1484-486500-LA MESA Vote Centers 1494 143 9.57 % 116 13 1484-486500-LA MESA Mail 1494 908 60.78 % 731 132
1484-486500-LA MESA Total 1494 1051 70.35 % 847 145
1485-486800-LA MESA Vote Centers 1561 135 8.65 % 101 28 1485-486800-LA MESA Mail 1561 1064 68.16 % 783 220
1485-486800-LA MESA Total 1561 1199 76.81 % 884 248
1486-487010-LA MESA Vote Centers 1101 113 10.26 % 82 22 1486-487010-LA MESA Mail 1101 737 66.94 % 553 127
1486-487010-LA MESA Total 1101 850 77.20 % 635 149
1487-487030-LA MESA Vote Centers 1602 158 9.86 % 123 21 1487-487030-LA MESA Mail 1602 941 58.74 % 701 170
1487-487030-LA MESA Total 1602 1099 68.60 % 824 191
1488-487090-LA MESA Vote Centers 1703 140 8.22 % 116 18 1488-487090-LA MESA Mail 1703 1204 70.70 % 935 217
1488-487090-LA MESA Total 1703 1344 78.92 % 1051 235
8062-999062-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8062-999062-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8062-999062-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8079-999079-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8629-999629-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 5 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA - MEASURE L
- Majority-Required to pass Registered Voters Voters Cast Turnout (%) YES
NO
8629-999629-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8629-999629-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8630-999630-VBM-AV Vote Centers 1 0 0.00 %
8630-999630-VBM-AV Mail 1 1 100.00 % 1
8630-999630-VBM-AV Total 1 1 100.00 % 1
8631-999631-VBM-AV Vote Centers 0 0
8631-999631-VBM-AV Mail 0 0
8631-999631-VBM-AV Total 0 0
8632-999632-VBM-AV Vote Centers 2 0 0.00 %
8632-999632-VBM-AV Mail 2 0 0.00 %
8632-999632-VBM-AV Total 2 0 0.00 %
Total - Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Total - Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Contest Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 4:05 PM Page 6 of 6 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
Precinct Canvass
November 5, 2024
1 CITY OF LA MESA - MEASURE L
- Majority-Required to pass
1 1
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
YES
NO
CITY OF LA MESA 481000-
487990
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
CITY OF LA MESA 481000-
487990
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
CITY OF LA MESA 481000-
487990
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - INCORP CITY
COUNCIL DISTS
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - INCORP CITY
COUNCIL DISTS
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - INCORP CITY
COUNCIL DISTS
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated -
UNINCORPORATED AREA
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated -
UNINCORPORATED AREA
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated -
UNINCORPORATED AREA
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - CALIFORNIA
WATER DISTRICTS
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - CALIFORNIA
WATER DISTRICTS
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - CALIFORNIA
WATER DISTRICTS
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREAS
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREAS
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - COMMUNITY
PLANNING AREAS
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - CSD - ROAD
MAINT SERV
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - CSD - ROAD
MAINT SERV
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - CSD - ROAD
MAINT SERV
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - CSD - SEWER
SERVICE
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - CSD - SEWER
SERVICE
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - CSD - SEWER
SERVICE
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - OVERALL
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - OVERALL
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - OVERALL
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - DISTRICTS/DIVISIONS
Vote Centers 38353 4008 10.45 % 3039 600
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - DISTRICTS/DIVISIONS
Mail 38353 26243 68.42 % 20034 4684
Unincorporated - FIRE PROT
DIST - DISTRICTS/DIVISIONS
Total 38353 30251 78.88 % 23073 5284
GROSSMONT HEALTHCARE 3 Vote Centers 38312 4006 10.46 % 3039 600 GROSSMONT HEALTHCARE 3 Mail 38312 26211 68.41 % 20008 4681 GROSSMONT HEALTHCARE 3 Total 38312 30217 78.87 % 23047 5281 Printed: Thursday, December 5, 2024 11:56 AM Data Refreshed: Thursday, December 5, 2024 11:56 AM Page 7 of 8 County of San Diego
Presidential General Election
District Total Canvass
Election Date: November 5, 2024
1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Date:
Location:
November 26, 2024, 6:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Colin Parent
Councilmember Jack Shu
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items can be taken out of order during the meeting.
The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.
Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER SHU
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.
4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
2 There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
MaryAnn Fowler spoke about the proposed development project at 9407 Jericho Road.
Cynthia Maina spoke about the proposed development project at 9407 Jericho Road.
6. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflict of interest disclosures.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments on Consent Calendar.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 8.1 through 8.11)
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 8.11).
Moved By Councilmember Shu
Seconded By Vice Mayor Dillard
Approve Consent Calendar Items 8.1 through 8.11.
For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)
8.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.
8.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2024
Approve.
8.3 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO CANCEL THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 24, 2024
3 Approve.
8.4 RESOLUTIONS APPROVING SALARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE
COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING SALARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 COMPENSATION PLAN PER
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-2905, ADJUSTMENT TO MAYOR, CITY
COUNCILMEMBER, AND CITY TREASURER COMPENSATION
Resolution No. 2024-141
Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING SALARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR FIRE
MARSHAL AND PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
CLASSIFICATIONS
Resolution No. 2024-142
Adopt Resolution.
8.5 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF THREE FORD POLICE
INTERCEPTOR UTILITY HYBRID VEHICLES TO SEDANO FORD AND
THE OUTFITTING TO AEP-CALIFORNIA, LLC
Resolution No. 2024-143
Adopt Resolution.
8.6 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF A FORD POLICE
INTERCEPTOR UTILITY HYBRID VEHICLE TO KEARNY MESA FORD
USING OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT FUNDS
Resolution No. 2024-144
Adopt Resolution.
8.7 RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR UKG HCM SYSTEM
ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
Resolution No. 2024-145
Adopt Resolution.
4 8.8 RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR SEWER MAIN
AND STREET RESURFACING WORK
Resolution No. 2024-146
Adopt Resolution.
8.9 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO TO ACT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AND SUBMIT A CALRECYCLE
WASTE TIRE ENFORCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION, EXECUTE
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO SECURE THE GRANT FUNDS, AND
IMPLEMENT THE GRANT ACTIVITIES
Resolution No. 2024-147
Adopt Resolution.
8.10 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 25-08 AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE PAVEMENT
CONDITION INDEX PROJECT
Resolution No. 2024-148
Adopt Resolution.
8.11 *PROJECT 2024-1616 (BLANCHE&BERNICE, LLC) - A REQUEST TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4679 DATE AVENUE,
APN 470-593-11-00 AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND ESTABLISH A
PROPERTY PRESERVATION (MILLS ACT) AGREEMENT
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE REUBEN M. LEVY HOUSE
AT 4679 DATE AVENUE, APN 470-593-11-00 AS A HISTORIC
LANDMARK
Resolution No. 2024-149
Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A HISTORIC
LANDMARK PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT WITH
THE OWNER OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK KNOWN AS THE
REUBEN M. LEVY HOUSE AT 4679 DATE AVENUE, APN 470-
593-11-00
Resolution No. 2024-150
5 Adopt Resolution.
9. STAFF REPORT
9.1 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF THE CLIMATE
ACTION PLAN (CAP) UPDATE
Environmental Sustainability Manager Ego presented a PowerPoint presentation on the CAP Update, outlining the Council's actions related to the CAP, as well as the planning and development process. This process included community outreach and engagement, with the Environmental Sustainability Commission serving as advisors to staff. Key topics covered were the incorporation of climate equity and environmental justice, cobenefits such as improved air quality, public health, safety, job creation, economic growth, resilience, livability, and reduced cost of living. The presentation also addressed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, targets, and projections, CAP Update strategies, measures, and actions, as well as the mode share analysis and climate adaptation strategies.
Additionally, the presentation included information on the Addendum to the 2018 SEIR for the CAP Update, the implementation and monitoring plan, and the public review period for the CAP Update.
Council questions and comments ensued.
Mairs Ryan submitted a comment inquiring about the funding strategy for implementing the CAP Update.
Lee Friedman, on behalf of San Diego Community Power, spoke in support of approving the CAP Update.
Wendy Mihalic spoke in support of approving the CAP Update.
Anthony Dang, representing the Climate Action Campaign, spoke in support of approving the CAP Update and provided recommendations for further improvement.
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE 2018 CAP
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (CEQA) SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (SEIR) FOR THE CAP UPDATE
Resolution No. 2024-151
Moved By Councilmember Shu
Seconded By Vice Mayor Dillard
6 Adopt Resolution.
For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Against (1): Councilmember Lothian
Approved (4 to 1)
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CAP UPDATE
Resolution No. 2024-152
Moved By Councilmember Shu
Seconded By Vice Mayor Dillard
(1) Adopt the Resolution with the following staff directives: (a) It is acknowledged that the GHG reduction goals outlined in the plan represent minimum targets, and achieving these goals more quickly and to a greater extent is desirable, especially considering the cobenefits they provide to city residents; (b) In accordance with a previous City Council resolution, the Council will continue to receive updates every six months or more frequently on the progress of implementing the plan; (c) To address the climate emergency, a previous resolution called for the involvement of all City departments in the implementation of the CAP. Therefore, brief progress reports from each department shall be included in these regular updates; (d) Given that this update is nearly two years behind schedule due to various issues, and recognizing that delays place a greater burden on future residents, an update to the plan, incorporating the most recent science and methods for reducing GHGs, shall be initiated soon and presented to the Council within two years; (e) The City's efforts to implement the actions outlined in the plan, including staff time and other resources, shall generally align with the anticipated GHG reductions in each sector of actions; and (f) Priority shall be given to changes and additional ordinances called for in the plan, with these being presented to the Council within two years or less. (2) The Council CAP Ad Hoc
Subcommittee shall collaborate with staff to develop strategies and methods for addressing equity issues in residential highperformance building conversions, including, but not limited to, budget augmentations.
7 For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Parent, and Councilmember Shu
Against (1): Councilmember Lothian
Approved (4 to 1)
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.
11. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
There were no reports.
12. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO AWARD RFP 25-11 FOR EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES TO HUB
INTERNATIONAL
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Human Resources
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council adopt the resolution to award RFP 25-11 for employee benefits insurance broker services to HUB International? Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt the resolution to award RFP 25-11 for employee benefits insurance broker services to HUB International.
Fiscal Impact:
Compensation for the agreement would be through standard commission rate through the insurance carriers.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 3
BACKGROUND:
The existing contact with HUB International Insurance Services, Inc. (HUB) for employee benefit services expires on December 31, 2024. In September 2024, City staff issued a request for proposals (RFP) 25-11 for employee benefits insurance services and received six responses. Based on the evaluation of the written proposal and oral interviews, staff selected HUB as the most qualified firm to provide the services. HUB has significant experience working in the public sector, demonstrated a thorough understanding of the required scope of services, and provided a competitive fee.
DISCUSSION:
In addition to medical benefits, employees are provided ancillary benefits, such as dental, vision, and life insurance. Human Resources staff work with an insurance broker to ensure competitive rates and effective services are provided. Medical benefits are provided directly through CalPERS Health and not included in the brokers’ scope of services.
The services provided by the insurance broker include identifying programs, products and insurers capable of meeting the City’s employee benefit needs; preparing bid specifications and soliciting proposals; and negotiating premium rates, benefit levels, performance standards and guarantees, and contractual terms and conditions on behalf of the City of La Mesa for those ancillary benefits. In addition, the broker provides claims adjudication support with insurance carriers, and resolves disputes involving coverage, billing and service delivery.
RFP 25-11 for employee benefit insurance broker services was published on September 9, 2024, and proposals were received from six respondents. All proposals were considered to be responsive to the RFP requirements and the top three were invited to be interviewed by department staff. HUB was considered to be the most qualified firm. The term of the agreement will be for three years starting January 1, 2025 with three one-year options to renew at the discretion of the City Manager.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution to award RFP 25-11 for employee benefits insurance broker services to HUB International.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Gretchen Spaniol
City Manager Director of Human Resources
_________________ __
Scott Munzenmaier
Purchasing Officer
Attachments: Resolution
Draft Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA TO AWARD RFP 25-11 FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES TO
HUB INTERNATIONAL
WHEREAS, in addition to medical benefits, employees are provided ancillary benefits, such as dental, vision, and life insurance. Human Resources staff work with an insurance broker to ensure competitive rates and effective services are provided; WHEREAS, RFP (Request For Proposals) 25-11 for Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services was published on September 9, 2024 and proposals were received from six respondents with HUB International considered to be the most qualified based on the written proposal received and oral interview; and
WHEREAS, the term of the agreement will be for three years starting January 1st to be paid through carrier commissions with three one-year options to renew at the discretion of the City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council intends to award RFP 25-11 for employee benefits insurance broker services for an initial term of three years with three one-year options to renew to HUB International.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
City of La Mesa
SERVICES AGREEMENT
Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ...............................
2. ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR............................................................................
3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR ..............................................
4. KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL .......................................................................................
5. CONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................
6. CITY REPRESENTATION ............................................................................................
7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY .............................................................................
8. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE ......................................................................................
9. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR ........................................................................
10. RECORDS .......................................................................................................................
11. METHOD OF COMPENSATION ..................................................................................
12. ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED TO CITY .........................................................................
13. DESIGN CHANGES OR REVISIONS...........................................................................
14. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OUTSIDE SCOPE .............................................................
15. HOLD HARMLESS ........................................................................................................
16. INSURANCE ...................................................................................................................
17. OWNERSHIP OF WORK ...............................................................................................
18. ASSIGNABILITY ...........................................................................................................
19. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENTS ................................................................................
20. NOTICES .........................................................................................................................
21. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ...............................................................................................
22. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE OR CONVENIENCE ...................
23. BUSINESS LICENSE .....................................................................................................
24. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY ...................................................................
25. INTEREST OF CONTRACTOR AND EMPLOYEES; .................................................
26. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................
27. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ..................................................................................
28. PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNIFICATION .................................................................
29. TIME ................................................................................................................................
30. CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT .......................................................................................
31. NON-DISCLOSURE .......................................................................................................
32. SUBCONTRACTING .....................................................................................................
33. CHANGES .......................................................................................................................
34. JOB SITE SAFETY .........................................................................................................
35. PREVAILING WAGES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS .......................................
36. CONFLICT BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS ......................
37. SIGNATURES .................................................................................................................
Attachments:
A - HUB Proposal
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
3 1. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Between the City of La Mesa and
HUB International
for Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
This Agreement is entered into by City of La Mesa as of ____________, by and between the City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and HUB International, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. ;
WHEREAS, the City has need for professional services to perform Employee Benefits Insurance Broker services and is willing to compensate Contractor for such services; WHEREAS, this Agreement is based on Request for Proposals 25-11; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Contractor to render certain technical and professional services in the providing of said professional services; and WHEREAS, Contractor is qualified to provide said professional services for Employee Benefits Insurance Broker service.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
2. ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR
The City hereby agrees to engage Contractor and Contractor hereby agrees to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement shall be for an initial term from the execution date of the Agreement through Friday, December 31, 2027 and may be renewed for an additional three one-year terms by mutual written consent of both parties. The City Manager shall have sole and exclusive right to exercise any options contained in this agreement on behalf of the City.
3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR
Contractor shall commence performance of the Project upon execution of this Agreement by both parties. The term "Project" as used in this Agreement shall include all of the tasks and items listed and described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.
4. KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL
Contractor agrees to provide the services of Jesus Mendoza, Senior Vice President, respectively for the full term of this Agreement. No substitutions will be made without prior written approval by the City. The City reserves the right to request specific qualifications for personnel substituted under this section.
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
4 5. CONTRACTORS
Contractor will utilize the services of the following subcontractors during the course of this study:
None.
Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. No substitution of proposed subcontractors shall be made without prior written approval by the City.
6. CITY REPRESENTATION
The City Manager for the City of La Mesa, or their designated representative, shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and shall administer said Agreement on behalf of the City. This person shall hereinafter be referred to as the "City's Representative."
7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
The City will provide the Contractor, or cause to be provided with, the following documents, services and site information, at no charge to the Contractor.
A. See Exhibit "A"
8. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
Both Contractor and the City recognize that time is of the essence in the completion of this work and the following schedule is dependent upon timely actions by the Contractor and the City.
Accordingly, the Contractor shall complete all of the work outlined in Exhibit "A" and described in this Agreement in accordance with the following schedule:
Execution of the Agreement through December 31, 2027 with three one-year options to renew.
The Contractor shall not be responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or failure of City to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Contractor's work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, or governmental agencies.
9. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR
Compensation to the Contractor shall be based on monthly broker commissions built into the employee benefit plans. Contractor’s commission is based upon percentages negotiated by the various insurance providers and paid directly to Contractor by said insurance providers. The commission percentages shall be disclosed to the City annually. Contractor’s compensation shall include, and Contractors shall be responsible for, the payment of all federal, state, and local taxes of any kind which are attributable to the compensation received. Contractor will include disclosed commissions rates on any new lines of coverage added during the term of the Agreement.
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
5 If there is a material change in risk/exposure base, or the overall scope of work increases on additional lines (e.g. if Contractor begins servicing the City’s health plan instead of CalPERS), Contractor may revise the compensation with approval from the City.
10. RECORDS
Contractor shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection audit of Contractor's time-andmaterial charges under this Agreement. Contractor shall make such records available to the City and to other public agencies responsible for approval, funding or auditing the project, during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records and they will be available only to the City or to public agencies involved with approval, funding or audit functions. Such records shall be maintained by the Contractor for three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement.
11. METHOD OF COMPENSATION
N/A
12. ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED TO CITY
The following items shall be delivered by the Contractor to the City of La Mesa:
A. See Exhibit "A"
13. DESIGN CHANGES OR REVISIONS
N/A
14. ADDITIONAL SERVICES OUTSIDE SCOPE
Only after written authorization from the City, additional services that Contractor could provide, or cause to be provided, include the following:
A. Additional work related to the Project but not included in the Scope of Work.
B. Additional work caused by changes unrelated to the Scope of Work described herein.
Contractor will be compensated for Contractor time and direct personnel expenses as approved by the City.
15. HOLD HARMLESS
To the furthest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage), and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including reasonable attorney's fees and litigation expenses) that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
6 of Contractor, its principals, officers, employees, agents or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement.
If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.
This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.
16. INSURANCE
Throughout the life of this Agreement, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A:VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) authorized by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. Contractor shall provide City with certificates of insurance (COI) evidencing all coverages and endorsements. Contractor agrees to name City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insured under said policy prior to providing the services in this Agreement. The following policies of insurance are required:
A. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Agreement) with limits of liability of not less than the following:
o $2,000,000 per occurrence
o $4,000,000 general aggregate
o $5,000 medical expense
B. ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT CERTIFICATE
C. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
D. COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
7 E. WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
F. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to Contractor’s profession, with limits of liability of $2,000,000 per claim/occurrence and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.
The certificate holder should be stated as:
City of La Mesa Attn: Risk Management, 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942 Should Contractor maintain insurance with broader coverage and/or limits of liability greater than those shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.
Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either:
(i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers: or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to City Manager or his/her designee, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.
All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.
The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form and shall name City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as an additional insured. Such policy(ies) of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. The Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
8 If the Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance policy is written on a claims-made coverage form:
A. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of this Agreement or the commencement of work by Contractor.
B. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Agreement, whichever first occurs.
C. (iii) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Agreement, or work commencement date, Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Agreement, whichever first occurs.
D. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.
E. These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Agreement.
Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received by City and approved by City Manager or his/her designee prior to City’s execution of the Agreement and before work commences. Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.
If at any time during the life of this Agreement or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Agreement.
The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals,
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
9 officers, employees, agents, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, Contractors, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.
If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors' certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.
17. OWNERSHIP OF WORK
All finished or unfinished documents, studies, reports, computer files and materials prepared by Contractor and subcontractors under this Agreement shall be considered the property of the City and will be turned over to the City upon demand, but in any event, upon completion of the Project.
The Contractor shall be allowed to retain copies of documents for his permanent records, if desired.
18. ASSIGNABILITY
Contractor shall not assign, delegate, or transfer this Agreement or any work hereunder, nor assign any monies due or to become due hereunder, except as expressly stated herein. In no event shall any contractual relation be created between any third party and the City without prior written consent of the City. A consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment.
19. INTEGRATION; AMENDMENTS
This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. There are no other agreements, expressed or implied, oral or written, except as set forth herein. This Agreement may be amended upon written mutual consent of both parties hereto.
Amendment requiring changes in compensation shall be subject to the City's change order procedures.
20. NOTICES
Notices and requests to the City or Contractor shall be delivered at the following addresses, either served personally on the designated representative or by U.S. Postal Service at the following addresses:
City:
Director of Administrative Services
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
10 (619) 667-1175
Contractor:
Senior Vice President
HUB International
9855 Scranton Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 768-7331
21. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The City shall require that all Contractors agree to submit any unresolved claims, counterclaims, disputes, controversies and other matters between them and the City or the Contractor and/or any subcontractors of any tier arising out of or relating to their agreement with the City or the breach thereof (“disputes”) first to mediation and then if not resolved, to non-binding arbitration prior to initiating suit or judicial proceeding.
If applicable – As provided in Public Contract Code section 9204, any claim filed by the Contractor on a public works project shall be reviewed by the City with 45 days and a written statement will be provided to the Contractor identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Upon receipt of a claim, the City and the Contractor may, by mutual agreement, extend the time period or it may be extended to allow City Council approval. The Contractor shall include reasonable documentation to support the claim. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the City issues its written statement.
22. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE OR CONVENIENCE
If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner their obligations under this Agreement, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately by giving written notice to the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Contractor under this Agreement shall, at the option of the City, become its property and the Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder.
In addition to termination for cause, the City may terminate this Agreement for City’s convenience upon not less than fifteen (15) days written notice to Contractor. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement unless said notice provides otherwise. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in this paragraph for City’s convenience, the Contractor shall be required to provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, services, etc., prepared by the Contractor as may be requested by City and such work shall
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
11 become City’s property upon payment to Contractor for the value of the work performed, less payments of compensation previously made.
Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the Agreement by the Contractor, and the City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Contractor is determined.
23. BUSINESS LICENSE
The Contractor, including all subcontractors, shall obtain a business license for work within the City of La Mesa pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Sections 6.08.010 through 6.08.240.
No payments shall be made to any Contractor until such business license has been obtained, and all fees paid therefor, by the Contractor and all subcontractors. Business license applications and information may be obtained from the Finance Department, City Hall, 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942-5502, (619) 667-1118 or online at cityoflamesa.us/buslic.
24. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY
No member of the governing body of the City and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the Contractor shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.
25. INTEREST OF CONTRACTOR AND EMPLOYEES;
STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS
The Contractor covenants that they presently have no interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in the study area or any parcels therein or any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their services hereunder. The Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. City may require Contractor to complete and submit a Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, in accordance with applicable law, to City Clerk.
26. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement.
27. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Contractor only insofar as the results of Contractor's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
12 28. PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNIFICATION
In the event that Contractor’s employee and/or agent providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS of the City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employer and employee contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of the employee as well as for payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of the City.
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Contractor’s employees providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation and benefit including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contributions to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
29. TIME
Contractor shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
30. CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT
Except as City may specify in writing, Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
31. NON-DISCLOSURE
The designs, plans, reports, investigations, materials and documents prepared or acquired by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement (including any duplicate copies kept by the Contractor) shall not be shown to any other public or private person or entity, except as authorized by the City.
The Contractor shall not disclose to any other public or private person or entity any information regarding the activities of the City except as authorized by the City.
32. SUBCONTRACTING
None of the services covered by the Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior consent of the City. The Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of their subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as they are for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by them. The Contractor shall insert in each subcontract appropriate provisions requiring compliance with the labor standards provisions of this Agreement.
33. CHANGES
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
13 The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Services of the Contract to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Contractor's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Contractor shall be incorporated to this Contract.
34. JOB SITE SAFETY
The general or prime Contractor who is responsible for means, methods and procedures of the project shall be responsible for job site safety.
The prime contractor and all subcontractors of all tiers shall:
A. Be responsible for the safety of their respective employees as required by law.
B. Come under the jurisdiction and supervision of the general or prime contractor’s job site safety program.
C. Exercise reasonable care to avoid risk of injury to others as required by the professional standard of care.
35. PREVAILING WAGES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
IF APPLICABLE
A. No professional Contractor or subcontractor subject to the requirements of State of California’s prevailing wages may be awarded a contract, or contracted with, for a public works project (submitted on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].
B. This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
36. CONFLICT BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and any documents incorporated by reference in this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall supersede those contained in any such document incorporated by reference.
37. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have executed the Agreement.
HUB International
By: _________________________________
Jesus Mendoza, Senior Vice President
Services Agreement #SA 25-56
Title: Employee Benefits Insurance Broker Services
14 Date: _____________
CITY OF LA MESA,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Dr. Mark Arapostathis, Mayor
Date: _____________
By: _________________________________
Greg Humora, City Manager
Date: _____________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: _________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
Attachment: Exhibit A – Scope of Work and Fee Schedule
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE
FORD F-150 LIGHTNING FOR THE COMMUNITY
CLEANUP COORDINATOR TO SEDANO FORD
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council adopt a resolution to award the purchase of one Ford F-150 Lightning electric vehicle for the Community Cleanup Coordinator to Sedano Ford?
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt the resolution to award the purchase of one Ford F-150 Lightning electric vehicle for the Community Cleanup Coordinator to Sedano Ford.
Fiscal Impact:
The quoted cost for the purchase of the vehicle is $64,577.55 and funds are budgeted and available in account 101-65850-131-000000.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 3
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
T-6 Municipal Fleet – Promote efforts that transition municipal vehicle fleet from gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles to alternative-fuel or lowemissions vehicles.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 2024, the City Council approved the classification of a new Community Cleanup Coordinator and one-time funds of $83,825 for the purchase of a new truck, tools, and supplies for the position.
DISCUSSION:
On September 24, 2024, the City Council approved the purchase of a Ford F-150 Lightning Electric Vehicle from Sedano Ford for the Public Works Fleet Maintenance Division. For that purchase, the City received quotes from two San Diego County Ford dealerships, Sedano Ford and Kearny Mesa Ford, and requested a third quote from Sourcewell, a cooperative purchasing contract provider; however, a quote was not received.
Staff has confirmed with Sedano Ford that the City can purchase an F-150 Lightning with the same specifications and price as previously awarded on September 24, 2024.
The City’s Purchasing Officer may waive competitive bidding when the City Council by resolution determines that, due to special circumstances, it is in the City's best interest to purchase a commodity without compliance with the bidding procedure, per La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070(a)(7).
Purchasing a Ford F-150 Lightning will help the City meet its Climate Action Plan goals and will maintain consistency with the current fleet. By purchasing from a local dealership instead of using a formal bid process, the City can support the local economy while securing the vehicle more quickly and from experienced and reliable vendors in government/commercial sales. Under these facts, the circumstances are that Sedano Ford can provide the needed vehicle quickly and at a reasonable cost while keeping the purchase within the local economy; and, as such, staff recommends that it is in the best interests of the City to enter into a purchase contract for a Ford F150 Lightning.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to award the purchase of one Ford F-150 Lightning electric vehicle for the Community Cleanup Coordinator to Sedano Ford.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Amanda Lee
City Manager Assistant City Manager
_________________ __
Scott Munzenmaier
Purchasing Officer
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Vehicle Pricing
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE FORD F-150 LIGHTNING FOR THE COMMUNITY
CLEANUP COORDINATOR TO SEDANO FORD
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2024 the City Council approved the classification of a new Community Cleanup Coordinator and one-time funds of $83,825 for the purchase of a new truck, tools and supplies for the position;
WHEREAS, the City previously received quotes from the two Ford dealerships in San Diego County that work with government fleets and have supplied the City in previous years and Sedano Ford had the lowest quote;
WHEREAS, the City’s Purchasing Officer may waive competitive bidding when the City Council by resolution determines that, due to special circumstances, it is in the city's best interest to purchase a commodity without compliance with the bidding procedure, per La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070(a)(7); and
WHEREAS, Sedano Ford can provide the needed vehicle quickly and at a reasonable cost while keeping the purchase within the local economy; and, as such, staff recommends that it is in the best interests of the City to enter into a purchase contract for a Ford F-150 Lightning electric vehicle without a formal bidding process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council intends to award the purchase of an F-150 Lightning electric vehicle for $64,577.55 to Sedano Ford.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Vehicle Sedano Ford Kearny Mesa Ford
National Auto Fleet
Group
F-150 Lightning (EV) $ 64,577.55 $ 67,526.13 No quote
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING AND
ACCEPTANCE OF SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS THROUGH
THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD AB102 GRANT
PROGRAM FROM THE CALIFORNIA BUDGET ACT OF
2023-2024 TO FUND THE PUBLIC WORKS SOLAR PANEL
AND BATTERY STORAGE PROJECT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize the filing and acceptance of specified grant funds through the California Air Resources Board AB102 Grant Program from the California Budget Act of 2023 – 2024 to fund the Public Works Solar Panel and Battery Storage Project and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments for the project? Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize the filing and acceptance of California Air Resources Board AB102 Grant funds to the Public Works Solar Panel and Battery Storage Project.
Fiscal Impact:
The grant amount for the Public Works Solar Panel and Battery Storage Project is $400,000. This amount will be appropriated in the City Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
City’s Strategic Goals:
Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 3
Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
E-3 Municipal Energy Efficiency – Reduce community-wide energy consumption for operations of municipal buildings and facilities.
BACKGROUND:
This grant originated from a line item in the State of California Assembly Bill 102, Budget Act of 2023, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The grant aims to support projects that reduce air pollution and promote clean transportation options within the community, often focusing on initiatives such as electric vehicle infrastructure, carsharing programs and community outreach to encourage cleaner transportation choices.
The grant may be applied to any phase of the project including project planning, design and construction.
DISCUSSION:
This grant program represents an opportunity to fund a solar panel and battery storage project at the public works operations yard at 8152 Commercial Street. The proposed project aims to reduce municipal energy costs, decrease carbon emissions, and enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure by implementing renewable energy solutions at a key municipal facility. By integrating solar photovoltaic panels with advanced battery storage technology, the City can generate clean, on-site electricity and maintain power during potential grid disruptions, ultimately supporting both climate action goals and operational continuity for essential public services.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the filing and acceptance of a California Air Resources Board AB102 Grant for Funds for the Public Works Solar Panel and Battery Storage Project and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and any amendments.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Jacob Martin
Senior Management Analyst
Attachments: A. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD AB102 GRANT PROGRAM FROM THE BUDGET ACT OF 2023/24 TO FUND THE PUBLIC WORKS SOLAR PANEL AND
BATTERY STORAGE PROJECT, AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR
DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENTS FOR
THE PROJECT
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 102 (AB 102), the California State Budget Act of 2023, specifically designated the City of La Mesa to receive a grant from the California Air Resource Board (CARB) of $400,000 for a public works solar panel and battery storage project; WHEREAS, the California Air Resource Board (CARB) has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of a grant to the City of La Mesa, setting up necessary procedures governing application; WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Air Resource Board (CARB) require the applicant’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City hereby approves the filing of the project application for grant funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City hereby certifies that it has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing specified grant funds, sufficient funds, including those provided by this grant, to complete the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby certifies that it will review, understand, and agree to the General Provisions contained in the contract referenced in the Procedural Guide once they are made available.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City hereby delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for completion of the project scope.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City hereby agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City, if awarded the grant(s), hereby appropriates the funds in a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in the amount of $400,000 for the Public Works Solar Panel and Battery Storage Project, provided however, that if the actual revenue received
from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to the amount actually received.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT TO BWE, INC. FOR THE
TOWER STREET MOBILITY ACCESS
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City of La Mesa award a professional services agreement to BWE, Inc. in the amount of $129,870 for roadway and site design services for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project?
Recommendation:
Adopt the attached resolution awarding a professional services agreement to BWE, Inc. in the amount of $129,870 for roadway and site design services for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project.
Fiscal Impact:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO BWE, INC.
CIP FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
REQUESTED
AMOUNT AVAILABLE
RTIP LAM 58: CIP 302-225DTR $104,870 $150,000
CA SB158: CIP: 302-225COT $25,000 $175,000
TOTAL $129,870 $325,000
City’s Strategic Goals:
Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 3
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
T-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure – Encourage active transportation options through planning and development of safe active transportation infrastructure and facilities in the City.
BACKGROUND:
This grant originated from a line item in the State of California Budget for fiscal year 2022- 23 at the request of Assembly Member Dr. Akilah Weber. The grant is intended to provide safe routes to schools and parks similar to Active Transportation Programs (ATP). The grant encourages walking and biking safely by providing sidewalks and bike lanes.
The project was awarded $175,000 in grant funds for improvements on Tower Street from 70th Street east to the City limit. The plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) portion of this grant award is $25,000 with the City to provide the remaining local funds via the Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
DISCUSSION:
Tower Street from 70th Street to the City Limit serves Rolando Elementary School and Sunshine Park. Tower Street is substantially under-improved and there is no continuous sidewalk or bike lane. A combination of private improvements and a lack of proper transportation planning and right of way makes it very challenging to provide the required facilities. The design and associated studies will provide a plan as to how to proceed to achieve the end goal of safe modes of transportation.
The scope of the design phase of the project is to develop a construction-ready plan set and specifications package with an engineer’s estimate (noted as Add Alternate on Attachment B).
In April 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications RFQ 24-01 for as-needed engineering services. BWE, Inc. was selected as a qualified firm to provide as-needed roadway and site design services. A master services agreement was executed with BWE, Inc. on August 15, 2024. A scope of work and fee were negotiated with BWE, Inc. to provide roadway and site design and cost estimating services for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project. The total fee for the project is $129,870; $25,000 will be paid for using grant funds, and $104,870 will be paid for using Regional Transportation Improvement Program funds. The remaining $150,000 of grant funding will be used to construct the sidewalk.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding a professional services agreement to BWE, Inc. for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project PS&E phase in the amount of $129,870.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Carly Cubberley, PE
Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Fee Schedule
C. Site Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO BWE, INC. FOR
ROADWAY AND SITE DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE TOWER STREET
MOBILITY ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation awarded a grant to the City of La Mesa for the School and Park Mobility Access Improvements Project; WHEREAS, two separate street segment projects are included in this project: Tower Street and Hoffman Avenue;
WHEREAS, the project application form requesting a grant amount of $175,000 for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project was submitted by the City on September 11, 2023;
WHEREAS, $25,000 of the grant amount requested is identified for pre-construction design services;
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa certifies it has adopted a Vision Zero Policy in September 2018, and the proposed project is in line with four of the activities of the policy; WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa adopted a Climate Action Plan in March 2018, which establishes a goal to reduce community-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 53% and reduce vehicle miles traveled by 6% by 2035 through infrastructure improvements and other programs; WHEREAS, in April 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications RFQ 24-01 for as-needed engineering services;
WHEREAS, BWE, INC. was selected as a qualified firm to provide as-needed roadway and site design services;
WHEREAS, a master service agreement was executed with BWE, Inc. on August 15, 2024; and
WHEREAS, a scope of work and fee were negotiated with BWE, Inc. to provide roadway and site design services for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a contract with BWE, Inc. to provide roadway and site design and cost estimating services for the Tower Street Mobility Access Improvements Project for the amount of $129,870; $25,000 from grant funding and $104,870 from City of La Mesa.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
619.299.5550 | bwesd.com | 9 of 10
PROPOSED FEE SUMMARY
* Final scope and pricing to be provided by the selected Arborist – this is a budget placeholder **Cost Estimation Exclusions: alternate options, supplementary interstitial cost estimates, value engineering studies, reconciliation with GC/CM, site visit (allow $1,000 if required), meetings with the City of La Mesa The estimated fees are based on Prevailing Wage rates for field services according to the Rate Schedule included in our Master Agreement dated August 15, 2024. Items not included in the scope of work including additional meetings and site visits will be provided, if required as an additional service billed on a time and materials basis.
Fee
Survey 1.1 Topographic and Limited Boundary $ 12,400.00 SUBTOTAL $ 12,400.00
2.1 Field Investigation $ 1,400.00
2.2 Civil Concept Design $ 9,200.00
2.3 Landscape Architecture Concept Design $ 10,925.00
SUBTOTAL $ 21,525.00
3.1 Water Quality Management Plan $ 1,600.00
3.2 Drainage Study $ 9,200.00
3.3 Public Improvement Plan Preparation $ 30,465.00
3.4 Revisions to Plans, Report and Forms $ 2,200.00
3.5 Preparation of Special Provisions $ 3,400.00
3.6 Landscape Architect Drawings $ 5,750.00
SUBTOTAL $ 52,615.00
4.1 Design Meetings and Project Coordination $ 1,900.00
4.2 Bidding and Outreach Support $ 3,565.00
SUBTOTAL $ 5,465.00
5.1 Limited Construction Observation and Coordination $ 3,500.00
5.2 Landscape Architecture $ 5,175.00
5.3 Arborist* $ 5,750.00
SUBTOTAL $ 14,425.00
6.1 Punch Walk and Preparation of Contractor Punch List $ 2,000.00
6.2 Processing of As-Builts $ 3,500.00
SUBTOTAL $ 5,500.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 111,930.00
Construction
Observation
Project Close Out
Tower Street Improvements
BWE Scope of Work
Concept Design
Design Devlopment/
Construction
Documents
Meetings, Coord. & Bid
Support Cost Estimation Concept Design, 60%, 100% & Final (1 selected design including 1 revision) ** $ 17,940.00
ADD ALTERNATE
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING SECOND RENEWAL
OPTION OF ANNUAL CONTRACT INCLUDING CPI
INCREASE FOR 2024 ANNUAL CONCRETE
MAINTENANCE PROJECT, BID 23-04, TO PORTILLO
CONCRETE, INC., FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$233,342.83.
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City of La Mesa adopt a resolution awarding a second renewal option of the annual contract including a CPI increase for the 2024 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project, Bid 23-04, to Portillo Concrete, Inc. for $233,342.83? Recommendation:
Adopt the attached resolution awarding the second renewal option of annual contract including CPI increase for 2024 Annual concrete Maintenance Project, Bid 23-04, to Portillo Concrete, Inc. for $233,342.83.
Fiscal Impact:
Funds for the project are available in the Capital Improvement Program, TransNet Repair, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and Ramps account 302-68300-0002-251TR.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 3
ACCOUNT NAME FUND
SOURCE
GL
ACCOUNT
AMOUNT
REQUESTED
AMOUNT
AVAILABLE
RTIP - LAM 33 Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk, and Ramps 21 TransNet 302-2211TR $689.00 $689.00 RTIP - LAM 33 Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk, and Ramps 22
TransNet 302-2221TR $1,420.00 $1,420.00
RTIP - LAM 33 Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk, and Ramps 24
TransNet 302-2241TR $4,027.46 $4,027.46
RTIP - LAM 33 Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk, and Ramps 25
TransNet 302-2251TR $227,206.37 $275,000.00
TOTAL $233,342.83 $281,136.46
City’s Strategic Goals:
Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.
BACKGROUND:
The City is divided into seven maintenance zones. Annually, the City focuses on one maintenance zone and repairs trip hazards, concrete sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, and the concrete infrastructure within the zone. The streets are then typically resurfaced with an asphalt overlay or slurry seal.
On September 15, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Portillo Concrete Inc., for the 2022 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project. Included in the award were options to renew the contract annually for up to four years with satisfactory performance. In addition, the contract allows for an annual unit price increase based on the Department of Transportation Price Index for Highway Items (CPI). This increase shall not exceed 2.5% annually.
DISCUSSION:
For the current fiscal year of the annual concrete maintenance project, there is an option to renew the construction contract awarded to Portillo Concrete Inc. and increase the unit prices based on the CPI. The option requires satisfactory performance as determined by the City Engineer. Portillo Concrete, Inc. completed the 2022 and 2023 Annual Concrete
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 3
Maintenance Project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Staff recommends renewing the second of four options with a 2.5% CPI increase to the unit prices from 2023.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and award the second contract option with a 2.5% CPI increase to the unit prices for the 2024 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project to Portillo Concrete Inc. for an amount not to exceed $233,342.83.
Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Respectfully submitted by:
Tristan Leger_______________________
Tristan Leger
Assistant Engineer
Attachments: A. Resolution awarding Bid 23-04 3rd renewal to Portillo Concrete Inc.
B. Zone 1 concrete maintenance map
C. Zone 1 concrete maintenance list
D. Bid Tabulation for Bid 23-04 3rd renewal
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AWARDING SECOND RENEWAL OPTION OF ANNUAL CONTRACT
INCLUDING CPI INCREASE FOR 2024 ANNUAL CONCRETE MAINTENANCE PROJECT, BID 23-04, TO PORTILLO CONCRETE, INC.
WHEREAS, one of the City’s strategic goals is to invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community;
WHEREAS, there is a need to repair or replace concrete infrastructure to remove damaged sidewalk panels and trip hazards in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA);
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Portillo Concrete Inc., for the 2022 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project; WHEREAS, the award included options to renew the contract annually for up to four one-year periods and allows for an annual increase to unit prices based on the Caltrans Construction Price Index (CPI), not exceeding 2.5%;
WHEREAS, on October 2, Amendment No. 2 was agreed upon for the contract fees to be increased to the Caltrans Construction Price Index, or as agreed upon by the City; and WHEREAS, the renewals required satisfactory performance of work as determined by the City Engineer and Portillo Concrete, Inc. completed the 2022 and 2023 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to accept and execute the second renewal contract with Portillo Concrete Inc., to perform the work, with a
2.5% CPI increase to unit prices, set forth in said contract with a project budget of $233,342.83.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
545660 308 30366 30468 301 79 78 311 41299 71 7686305 306 8990127 313 134 300 139 298 157 160 148 149 919299 233 101 231 169 225 162 224 223 252 251 302 248 247 246218 211 202 243 241 240 238 190114 103 104 106 105 109 110 115 282625 3142220 MAGRUDER ST BALDRICH ST GRABLE ST 199 MACQUARIE ST McRAE AVE MELODY LN
MARYLAND AVE OAKLAND RD
KIOWA DR
LAKE MURRAY BLVD
MARY FELLOWS AVE 176 172 222 177
GUESSMAN AVE 151412 291 69 297 97 145 142
WAKARUSA ST
1 2 SENECA PL
OLIVE AVE 35' 7460 7470 7450
3 UNIVERSITY AVE OLIVE AVE 50' 4440 4450
4 NORTH NORTH NORTH
NORTH
ID Number Width ' Length ' Area Address Street Notes
308 5 15 75 Kiowa & Lake Murray 3 separate areas; east of Kiowa in between intersection and crosswalk on South side 54 5 20 100 Kiowa & Lake Murray SE corner
56 5 30 150 Kiowa 35' South of Kiowa @ Lake Murray (start of red curb) by fire hydrant on East side 60 5 10 50 Kiowa 45' North of Adagio Apartment Driveway in front of transformer on East side 303 5 40 200 Kiowa Spalding on West side
66 5 5 25 Kiowa 233' south of intersection of Lake Murray & Kiowa at Water meter on West side inc. driveway 304 5 10 50 Kiowa Apt. 37 chipping on West side
68 5 20 100 Kiowa South of the light post and transformer across from Apt. 36 on East side 71 5 10 50 Kiowa & Oakland NE corner
86 10 20 200 Kiowa & Oakland SE corner
305 5 10 50 Kiowa 25' South of Oakland across from Apt. 22 on East side 306 5 20 100 Kiowa South of Oakland immediately south of driveway apron on West side 91 0 Kiowa North of elementary school playground access gate 92 0 Kiowa South of elementary school playground access gate 97 5 5 25 Kiowa East of intersection of Kiowa and Macquarie 99 5 5 5 5395 Kiowa North side of driveway
101 5 5 5 5395 Kiowa South side of driveway
169 5 15 75 7200 Baldrich *Notify resident that driveway will be inaccessible for 1 week* 5 5 25 7210 Baldrich 1sqr at address
162 5 25 125 7255 Baldrich South
199 5 5 25 7180 Grable
190 5 5 25 7235 Grable
114 5 5 25 7245 Grable West side on Maryland
157 5 25 125 7230 Macquarie 4 squares and 1 other
298 5 35 175 7240 Macquarie
160 5 20 100 7255 Macquarie Chip next to ccut
148 5 5 25 5396 Mary Fellows 1st area
149 5 5 25 5396 Mary Fellows 2nd area
233 2 5 10 5370 Mary Fellows Median slab
231 5 40 200 5370 Mary Fellows Across from address; from ccut to corner 225 5 7 35 5320 Mary Fellows East side of street
224 10 10 100 5318 Mary Fellows East side of street
223 5 5 25 5290 Mary Fellows Half of the 5x10 uncut slab 218 5 10 50 5260 Mary Fellows
202 5 10 50 Mary Fellows & Grable NE Corner just East of ramp corner on curved/spandrel section 211 5 15 75 5240 Mary Fellows
41 5 5 25 5563 Maryland West side of street
299 5 5 25 Maryland 70' North of intersection at Oakland (Left of transformer) on West side 28 5 10 50 Maryland Just North of painted blue path on East side 26 5 5 25 Maryland Ave Elementary Where school ends by transformer & utility pole Sidewalk Squares
25 5 10 50 Maryland Ave Elementary By ped cross sign just North of parking lot on West side 314 4 8 32 Maryland Ave Elementary Crosswalk on West side 22 5 5 25 5354 Maryland East side of street
20 5 10 50 5348 Maryland Across from; by street light
115 5 5 25 5215 Maryland Immediately N of intersection
300 2 40 80 McRae 70' South of intersection at Melody - next to curb on West side 139 2 20 40 5420 McRae Left of driveway
134 5 20 100 5430 Melody & McRae SW corner
313 5 5 25 Melody & McRae North side
127 5 15 75 7245 Melody North side North and East of driveway 76 5 5 25 Oakland & Kiowa 15' East of intersection on South side 301 5 10 50 5437 Oakland Ave By storm drain cover on North side 79 5 20 100 5437 Oakland Ave By street light on North side 311 2 5 10 Oakland Across from elementary school playground on North side 252 10 25 250 Parkway East of Wellgreens and West of API driveway 251 5 15 75 Parkway Old light post
302 5 10 50 Parkway Red Fire Dept. Meter & Stop sign by Fwy Loop 248 5 15 75 Parkway West of API
247 5 5 25 Parkway Alvarado Parkway Institute immediately east of storm drain 246 5 10 50 Parkway TotalVision by hydrant
243 5 11 55 Parkway 4FrontRx where ccut west of meter
241 5 10 50 Parkway In front of Aromi 45' west of hydrant 240 5 10 50 Parkway By firehydrant in front of JCS
238 5 10 50 Parkway Far right side of Red JCS Building between trees approx. 20' west of ped ramp on North side 62 Locations Total SQFT 4022
ID Number SF Type Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2
89 C Melody Ln Kiowa Dr
89-Sidewalk 175
90 C Melody Ln Kiowa Dr
90-Sidewalk 105
142 A
142-Sidewalk 35
145 A
145-Sidewalk 35
103 A Magruder St Kiowa Dr
103-Sidewalk 35
104 A Magruder St Kiowa Dr
104-Sidewalk 35
106 A Kiowa Dr Maryland Ave
106-Sidewalk 70
105 A Kiowa Dr Maryland Ave
105-Sidewalk 140
15 A
15-Sidewalk 35
14 A
14-Sidewalk 280
109 A Grable St Maryland Ave
109-Sidewalk 245
110 A Grable St Maryland Ave
110-Sidewalk 140
176 A Baldrich St Mary Fellows Ave
176-Sidewalk 140
172 A Baldrich St Mary Fellows Ave
172-Sidewalk 140
222 A Magruder St Mary Fellows Ave
222-Sidewalk 315
177 A Magruder St Mary Fellows Ave
177-Sidewalk 210
1 A Center Dr (Wakarusa St)
1-Sidewalk 0
2 A Center Dr (Wakarusa St)
2-Sidewalk 0
291 A Oakland Rd Kiowa Dr
2-Sidewalk 350
Count: 19 Ramps
Total SF: 2485
Ped Ramps
ID Number Length ' Address Street Notes
3 35 7460 Seneca Pl
4 15 4440 Olive Ave Curb wing on driveway apron
301 10 5437 Oakland
66 8 By ID# 66 @Water meter on Kiowa
306 6 By ID# 306 @Driveway apron on Kiowa
89 8 By ID# 89 @Melody & Kiowa
Count: 82
Curb & Gutter
City of La Mesa
Bid Results for Project 2022 Annual Concrete Maintenance Project (Bid 23-04) (Renewal #2) Award Issued on 06/09/2022
Line Totals (Unit Price * Quantity)
Item Num Section Description Unit of Measure Quantity Portillo Concrete Inc - Unit Price Portillo Concrete Inc - Line Total 1 Main Bid TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFETY PLAN LS 1 11,018.96 $ 11,018.96 $ 2 Main Bid REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER LF 82 16.53 $ 1,355.46 $ 3 Main Bid REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB RAMP, CROSS GUTTER, AND DRIVEWAY SF 8407 5.51 $ 46,322.57 $ 4 Main Bid REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL CY 2 110.19 $ 220.38 $ 5 Main Bid INSTALL 6” CURB AND GUTTER (G-2) LF 82 55.09 $ 4,517.38 $ 6 Main Bid INSTALL PCC SIDEWALK (G-7, G-11) SF 6507 11.02 $ 71,707.14 $ 7 Main Bid INSTALL ‘TYPE A’ CURB RAMP (G-28) EA 17 4,958.53 $ 84,295.01 $ 8 Main Bid INSTALL ‘TYPE C’ CURB RAMP (G-29) EA 2 4,958.53 $ 9,917.06 $ 9 Main Bid INSTALL CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE CY 2 66.11 $ 132.22 $ 10 Main Bid ADJUST UTILITIES TO GRADE LS 2 1,101.90 $ 2,203.80 $ 11 Main Bid REMOVE AND REPLACE EX #3E PULLBOX EA 3 550.95 $ 1,652.85 $ 12 Main Bid INSTALL PCC CROSS GUTTER OVER 10” CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE (G-12) SF 0 27.55 $ - $ 13 Main Bid INSTALL PCC DRIVEWAY (G-14) SF 0 22.04 $ - $ Subtotal $233,342.83
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of adopting (i) a resolution approving the Successor Agency’s Administrative Budget for the twelvemonth period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, and (ii) a resolution approving the Successor Agency’s
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelvemonth period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager and Finance
SUMMARY:
Issues:
1. Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelvemonth period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026?
2. Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026? Recommendation:
1. That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelvemonth period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026; and
2. That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 2 of 4
Fiscal Impact:
The ROPS 25-26 identifies all payment obligations of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency), the anticipated timeframes for payment of the obligations, and the funding sources from which the payments are made. Of note, the ROPS 25-26 includes as Item #5 on the ROPS Detail, as an enforceable obligation of the Successor Agency, the City’s carryback loan to the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency for the former Redevelopment Agency’s purchase of real property from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, among other items. This Item #5 was previously approved by the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board to the La Mesa Successor Agency, and the California Department of Finance (Department of Finance) on a prior ROPS as an “enforceable obligation”.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Dissolution Law governing the wind-down of the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency’s (Former RDA) affairs requires the Successor Agency to prepare an Administrative Budget before each fiscal year period and to submit the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board (defined below) for approval. The Dissolution Law further requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (County Auditor-Controller) for each 6-month period in the fiscal year the administrative cost estimates from its approved Administrative Budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) established for the Successor Agency. The administrative cost estimates paid with RPTTF for the fiscal year is also known as Administrative Cost Allowance. Based on a thorough review of past and present administrative expenses and responsibilities, the Successor Agency is requesting for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 a total amount of $18,900 as its Administrative Cost Allowance to pay its estimated administrative costs that are detailed in the proposed Administrative Budget.
In addition, the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period and to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26), after approval by the Oversight Board (defined below), to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2025. The ROPS serves as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source. The County Auditor-Controller is responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues from the RPTTF sufficient to meet the requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period. In this regard, RPTTF funds are paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency on January 2 and June 1 of each year to
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 3 of 4
make payments on the approved ROPS. The Successor Agency has determined that it requires a total amount of $1,231,476 from the RPTTF for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 to meet the financial enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency listed on the ROPS 25-26.
Payment obligations listed on the ROPS 25-26 include funding for the legal defense of the lawsuit filed by the San Diego Affordable Housing Coalition, funding for annual auditing services, and payment to the City of the City’s carryback loan to the Former RDA for the Former RDA’s purchase of real property located at 8181 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California (commonly referred to as the “Old Police Station Site”) from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, and the Administrative Cost Allowance for the Successor Agency.
As a part of the ROPS 25-26, the Dissolution Law requires a reporting of cash balances for the prior period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 to determine the amount of unspent RPTTF funds received by the Successor Agency for payment obligations listed on the ROPS 22-23 that can be allocated and used toward payment obligations listed on the ROPS 25-26. A separate reconciliation of the ROPS 22-23 covering the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 has determined an unaudited total amount of $35,251 in unspent RPTTF funds which, if concurred by the Department of Finance, will be used by the Successor Agency to fund payment obligations listed on the ROPS 25-26, and therefore reduce the amount of RPTTF to be paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency in Fiscal Year 2025-2026 for the ROPS 25-26.
In 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (Oversight Board) was established pursuant to the Dissolution Law. This Oversight Board oversees all successor agencies located in the County of San Diego, including the Successor Agency, and replaces by operation of law the previously constituted local oversight board of the Successor Agency. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are set forth in the Dissolution Law.
Pursuant to the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is obligated to prepare and submit the ROPS on forms provided by the Department of Finance. In this regard, the Successor Agency staff has included in both Resolution No. 2024-045 SA (i.e. Section 3(vi)) and Resolution No. 2024-046 SA (i.e. Section 3(iv)) authorization and direction to the Executive Director or designee to revise the ROPS 25-26 and the Administrative Budget (if necessary), and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 25-26 and the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 25-26 and the Administrative Budget in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 25-26 and the Administrative Budget to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance. The Oversight Board will consider the
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 10, 2024
Page: 4 of 4
Administrative Budget and the ROPS 25-26 at its meeting set for Thursday, January 16, 2025, and the deadline to submit the ROPS 25-26 to the Department of Finance is February 1, 2025.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the Successor Agency take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026; and
2. Adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (ROPS 25- 26).
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Tammie Royales
City Manager Director of Finance
Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2024-045 SA Approving the Administrative Budget B. Administrative Budget
C. Resolution No. 2024-046 SA Approving the ROPS 25-26
D. ROPS 25-26
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024–045 SA
RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 (ROPS 25-26 PERIOD)
AND APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code;
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of paying, performing and enforcing the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies and expeditiously winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-005 on January 10, 2012, pursuant to Part 1.85 of AB 26, electing for the City to serve as the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Successor Agency”), and electing for the City to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions of the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Housing Successor”); WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved by operation of law and the Successor Agency and Housing Successor were established pursuant to AB 26;
WHEREAS, AB 26 has since been amended by various assembly and senate bills enacted and signed by the Governor. AB 26 as amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Dissolution Law”;
WHEREAS, in 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law;
2 WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare an administrative budget and submit the administrative budget to the Oversight Board for approval. The administrative budget shall include all of the following: (i) estimated amounts for Successor Agency administrative costs for the upcoming two 6-month fiscal periods; (ii) proposed sources of payment for Successor Agency administrative costs; and (iii) proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations services provided by the City or other entity;
WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(k) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) for each 6-month fiscal period the administrative cost estimates from its approved administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) established for the Successor Agency;
WHEREAS, staff of the Successor Agency seeks the Successor Agency’s approval of the administrative budget for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (“Administrative Budget”), in the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting, and the Successor Agency’s authorization to submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its approval and to forward the information required by H&S Code Section 34177(k) to the County Auditor-Controller;
WHEREAS, the Administrative Budget has been prepared in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law and is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law. As indicated in the Administrative Budget, the Successor Agency does not directly employ its own staff but relies on the employees and staff members of the City to perform its functions and operations required by the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, the proposed source of payment of the costs set forth in the Administrative Budget in the amount of $18,900 is property taxes from the County’s RPTTF established for the Successor Agency. These costs in the amount of $18,900 are listed as Item #15 on the proposed Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”) for funding from RPTTF, which ROPS 25- 26 is proposed to be considered by the Successor Agency at this same meeting of the Successor Agency;
WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency will submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the San Diego County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for review and approval;
WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34179(f) of the Dissolution Law, all notices required by law for proposed actions of the Oversight Board will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website or the Oversight Board’s internet website; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law, written
3 notice and information about all actions taken by the Oversight Board shall be provided to the Department of Finance as an approved Resolution by electronic means and in a manner of the Department of Finance’s choosing; except, however, the Oversight Board is not required, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1)(B), to submit the Oversight Board action approving the Administrative Budget to the Department of Finance for its approval; WHEREAS, in furtherance of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the County Auditor-Controller and the State Controller’s Office and will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website. If desired by the Successor Agency and the Oversight Board, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the Department of Finance;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) and (3) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2025 and January 2, 2026 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the approved ROPS 25-26 and for the administrative cost allowance for administrative costs set forth in the Administrative Budget; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.
Section 2. The Successor Agency approves the Administrative Budget for the 12- month fiscal year period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.
Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its review and approval and concurrently submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance; (ii) if desired by the Successor Agency or the Oversight Board, submit the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, and written notice of the Oversight Board’s approval of the Administrative Budget by Resolution, to the Department of Finance electronically pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law; (iii) submit a copy of the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, to the County AuditorController and the State Controller’s Office; (iv) post the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (v) upon approval of the Oversight Board, submit to the County Auditor-Controller the administrative cost estimates from the Administrative Budget in the amount of $18,900 that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established for the Successor Agency; (vi) revise the Administrative Budget, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the Administrative Budget
4 in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the Administrative Budget to the form or format as may be prescribed by the Department of Finance; and (vii) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.
Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.
Section 5. The adoption of this Resolution is not intended to and shall not constitute a waiver by the Successor Agency of any constitutional, legal or equitable rights that the Successor Agency may have to challenge, through any administrative or judicial proceedings, the effectiveness and/or legality of all or any portion of the Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024-045 SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)
Successor Agency to the La Mesa Redevelopment Agency
Agency Administrative Budget
ROPS 25-26
July - December
2025
January - June
2026
Total for Fiscal
Year 2025-2026
SALARIES AND BENEFITS
Salaries $2,611.00 $2,611.00 $5,222.00
Benefits $1,770.75 $1,770.75 $3,541.50
Total Salaries & Benefits $4,381.75 $4,381.75 $8,763.50
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Materials, Services & Supplies
Cell Phone Allowance $12.00 $12.00 $24.00
Office Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Postage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Books, Subscriptions & Printing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Dept Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Advertising $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Mileage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Professional & Specialized Services $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 Car Allowance $56.25 $56.25 $112.50
Misc Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Materials, Services & Supplies $5,056.25 $5,056.25 $10,112.50 Total Successor Agency Admin Allowance $9,450.00 $9,450.00 $18,900.00
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-046 SA
RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING
THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 25-26) FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2025
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 AND APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code;
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of paying, performing and enforcing the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies and expeditiously winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-005 on January 10, 2012, pursuant to Part 1.85 of AB 26, electing for the City to serve as the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Successor Agency”), and electing for the City to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions of the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Housing Successor”); WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved by operation of law and the Successor Agency and Housing Successor were established pursuant to AB 26;
WHEREAS, AB 26 has since been amended by various assembly and senate bills enacted and signed by the Governor. AB 26 as amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Dissolution Law”;
WHEREAS, in 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law;
2 WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34171(h) of the Dissolution Law, “Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule” (“ROPS”) means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency for each fiscal year as provided in H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(3) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS shall be forward looking to the next one year in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(o);
WHEREAS, according to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period. For each recognized obligation, the ROPS shall identify one or more of the following sources of payment: (i) Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds, (ii) bond proceeds, (iii) reserve balances, (iv) administrative cost allowance, (v) the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation or by the provisions of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, and (vi) other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived from the former Redevelopment Agency as approved by the Oversight Board in accordance with Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Dissolution Law that the ROPS serve as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source and that the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) will be responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues sufficient to meet the requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is required to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, after its approval and adoption by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2025; WHEREAS, the ROPS covering the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 (“ROPS 25-26”) is presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting for review, approval, and adoption;
WHEREAS, if approved and adopted by the Successor Agency, the ROPS 25-26 shall thereafter be submitted to the Oversight Board for review, approval, and adoption. In this regard, H&S Code Sections 34177(l)(2)(B) and 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to submit a copy of the ROPS 25-26 to the San Diego County Administrative Officer (“County Administrative Officer”), the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the ROPS 25-26 to the Oversight Board for approval;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(2)(C) of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 25-26 shall be submitted to the County AuditorController, the State Controller’s Office and the Department of Finance and shall be posted on
3 the Successor Agency’s internet website;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1)(A) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall submit a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 25-26 to the Department of Finance in the manner provided by the Department of Finance; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2025 and January 2, 2026 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the ROPS 25-26 and approved by the Department of Finance;
WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 25-26 is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law;
WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 25-26 contains the schedules for payments on enforceable obligations required for the applicable fiscal year period and sources of funds for payments as required pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l) of the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS 25-26 as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board shall be submitted to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2025.
Section 34177(o)(1) further provides that the Department of Finance shall make its determination of the enforceable obligations and the amounts and funding sources of the enforceable obligations no later than April 15, 2025 and that the Successor Agency may, within five (5) business days of the Department of Finance’s determination, request additional review by the Department of Finance and an opportunity to meet and confer on disputed items. In the event of a meet and confer and request for additional review, the Department of Finance shall notify the Successor Agency and the County Auditor-Controller as to the outcome of its review at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of the first property tax distribution for that period (i.e. before June 1, 2025); and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.
Section 2. The Successor Agency approves and adopts the ROPS 25-26 for the 12- month fiscal year period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.
Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) provide the ROPS 25-26 to the Oversight Board for review, approval, and adoption and concurrently submit a copy of the ROPS 25-26 to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance; (ii) submit the ROPS 25-26, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and to the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2025; (iii) submit a copy
4 of the ROPS 25-26, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the State Controller’s Office and post the ROPS 25-26 on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (iv) revise the ROPS 25-26, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 25-26 to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 25-26 in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 25-26 to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance; (v) make other non-substantive changes and amendments to the ROPS 25-26 as may be approved by the Executive Director of the Successor Agency and its legal counsel; and (vi) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.
Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.
Section 5. The adoption of this Resolution is not intended to and shall not constitute a waiver by the Successor Agency of any constitutional, legal or equitable rights that the Successor Agency may have to challenge, through any administrative or judicial proceedings, the effectiveness and/or legality of all or any portion of the Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 10
th day of December 2024, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2024-046 SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: La Mesa
County: San Diego
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
25-26A Total
(July -
December)
25-26B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 25-26
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 1,202,026 $ 29,450 $ 1,231,476 F RPTTF 1,192,576 20,000 1,212,576
G Administrative RPTTF 9,450 9,450 18,900
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,202,026 $ 29,450 $ 1,231,476 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:
Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
$3,848,701 $1,231,476 $- $- $- $1,192,576 $9,450 $1,202,026 $- $- $- $20,000 $9,450 $29,450 5 Police Station
Site Loan
Repayment
per HSC
34191.4(b)
City/County
Loan (Prior
06/28/11),
Property
transaction
11/25/
2008
06/30/2040 City of La
Mesa
Police Station
Land Purchase
-Enforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34191.4(b); OB
Resolution No.
OB 2017-04
finding loan
was made for
legitimate
redevelopment
purposes and
approving
repayment
Fletcher
Pkwy
3,756,251 N $1,139,026 - - - 1,139,026 - $1,139,026 - - - - - $- 15 Administrative
Cost
Allowance
Admin
Costs
07/01/
2025
06/30/2026 Various Administrative
Cost
Allowance
under AB1X26
- See
Oversight
Board
Resolution
approving the
Administrative
Budget and
Administrative
Cost
Allowance
n/a 18,900 N $18,900 - - - - 9,450 $9,450 - - - - 9,450 $9,450 17 Defense of
Affordable
Housing
Coalition
Lawsuit
Litigation 07/30/
2013
06/30/2026 Kane,
Ballmer &
Berkman/
SA
Legal Defense
of Affordable
Housing
Coalition's
lawsuitEnforceable
Obligation per
HSC 34171(b)
and
34171(d)(1)(F)
Central/
Fletcher/
Alvarado
Creek
70,000 N $70,000 - - - 50,000 - $50,000 - - - 20,000 - $20,000 21 Contract for
Auditing
Professional
Services
05/23/
2016
06/30/2026 Rogers,
Anderson,
Auditing
ServicesCentral/Fletcher/
3,550 N $3,550 - - - 3,550 - $3,550 - - - - - $-
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
Services Malody &
Scott
Enforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34171(d)(1)(C),
34177(n) and
34171(d)(1)(F)
Alvarado
Creek
La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.
A B C D E F G H
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.
Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/22)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
44,254 32 98,846 E1: $28,144 PPA (ROPS 20-21) per DOF
Determination letter dated 3/24/23 PLUS
$16,110 PPA (ROPS 21-22) DOF
Determination letter dated 3/15/2024. F1:
Cash on hand with Trustee. G1: $98,846 PPA
(ROPS 19-20) per DOF Determination letter
dated 3/25/22.
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/23)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 22-23 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
1,174,954 G2: ROPS 22-23A/B RPTTF Distributions per
DOF Determination letter dated 3/25/22 and
paid by County Auditor/Controller.
3 Expenditures for ROPS 22-23 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/23)
32 1,270,896 F3: Cash on hand applied by trustee to debt service payment. G3: Expenditures per Audit
Trail for FY 2022-2023. Including $98,846
PPA (ROPS 19-20) per ROPS 22-23 DOF
Determination letter dated 3/25/22.
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/23) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
44,254 E4: $28,144 PPA (ROPS 20-21) per DOF
Determination letter dated 3/24/23 PLUS
$16,110 PPA (ROPS 21-22) per DOF
Determination letter dated 3/15/2024.
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.
A B C D E F G H
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.
Non-Admin
and Admin
5 ROPS 22-23 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 22-23 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required 35,251
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/23)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $- $- $(32,347) E6: SA Shortage
La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Notes July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
Item # Notes/Comments
5 On 12/7/17, OB approved Reso 2017-04, (i) finding per Section 34191.4(b)(1) that City's seller carryback loan provided to former RDA was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; (ii) approving the loan as an EO of SA; (iii) approving repayment of remaining principal balance of $6M of original Purchase Price from RPTTF as an EO to be listed on successive ROPS; and (iv) authorizing SA Exec Dir to include repayment on successive ROPS until the loan is repaid in full. On 1/23/18, DOF letter approved the loan and repayment of loan on the ROPS in outstanding principal balance of $5.3M. For ROPS 25-26, Item A-5, SA estimates the permissible RPTTF payment of $1,139,026, calculated per Section 34191.4(b) as the 50% increase in residual RPTTF paid to ATE's in FY2012-2013 of $2,083,973 and estimated to be paid to ATE's in current year 2024-2025 of $4,362.025. 15 17 Funds required for defense of the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County v. City of La Mesa as Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency et al. Litigation costs due to the filing of a lawsuit by the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County against several successor agencies that unmet obligations of the former RDA pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA payable from RPTTF. Cost relating to potential and pending litigation in connection with assets and obligations constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA and shall be payable from RPTTF funds, not as an administrative cost, pursuant to HSC Section 34171(b) and 34171(d)(1)(f) of the Dissolution Law. Thirty thousand dollars of the $70,000 of the RPTTF requested for this item will be used to repay the City for it's loan to the SA to pay overages for this item in Fiscal year 2023-2024.
21
DATE: December 10, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING A COUNCILMEMBER AS THE
INTERIM SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER REPRESENTATIVE TO
TAKE PART IN THE DECEMBER 12, 2024, SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY
POWER BOARD MEETING
The San Diego Community Power (SDCP) Board of Directors meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 12, 2024. Councilmember Parent is the primary representative, and Councilmember Shu is the alternate. Both Councilmember Parent and Councilmember Shu’s terms end on December 10, 2024, requiring an interim appointment for a City representative to attend the SDCP Board meeting on December
12. Regular appointments and reappointments to outside boards, commissions, and committees will occur at the City Council meeting on January 14, 2025.
The Mayor will make the interim appointment with the approval of the City Council.
Currently, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) allows councilmembers to participate and vote on appointments to outside boards and commissions, even if those appointments may result in income for the councilmember. To comply with FPPC regulations, a Form 806 must be completed and posted on the City’s website. After the interim appointment at the December 10 Council meeting, a Form 806 will be prepared and made available.
Staff recommends that the Mayor, with City Council approval, appoint an interim representative to the SDCP Board of Directors to take part in its December 12, 2024 meeting.