La Mesa City Council
July 8, 2025

LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA

A Regular Meeting

Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:

Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.us), Facebook Live (www.facebook.com/lamesaca) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:

The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:

Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.

Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot be combined or yielded to another speaker. *Live Remote Public Comment ONLY permitted during Councilmember teleconferencing pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953 (AB 2449).
*Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.

Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Administrative Services Department 48 hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].

Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo i.d. or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER CAZARES

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF JULY 2025 AS PARKS AND

RECREATION MONTH

5.2 PROCLAIMING JULY 8, 2025, AS METROPOLITAN AREA ADVISORY

COMMITTEE ON ANTI-POVERTY (MAAC) DAY

5.3 PRESENTATION OF THE LA MESA COMMUNITY PARKING

COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO UPDATE PARKING METER

RATES, PARKING PERMIT PRICING, AND PARKING PERMIT

PROGRAM GUIDELINES IN PARKING DISTRICT ONE
1 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.

If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS

8.1 ANNUAL INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR OPENINGS ON THE
CITY’S BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
8 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman

9. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

9.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE

UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY POLICE

OVERSIGHT BOARD
12 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

The Mayor make the appointment to fill the unscheduled vacancy on the Community Police Oversight Board, with the approval of Council, and adopt the Resolution confirming the appointment.

10. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.

11. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 11.1 through 11.13)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 11.1 through 11.13.

11.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2025
15 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.3 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2025
18 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.4 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR

MEETING, LA MESA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY SPECIAL

MEETING, AND CITY OF LA MESA SUCCESSOR AGENCY SPECIAL
MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025
25 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.5 RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO CHEN RYAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

THE INDUSTRIAL AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(WALKABILITY STUDY)
34 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11.6 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO NV5 TO

PERFORM APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE GROSSMONT

CENTER DRIVE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING PROJECT (CIP
NO. 8309)
44 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11.7 RESOLUTIONS AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR THE 2025 PAVING

PROJECT
63 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BIDDER FOR BID 25-
17 AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
THE 2025 PAVING PROJECT TO HAZARD CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERING, INC. (CIP NO. 8304)
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA

TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE 2025 PAVING PROJECT
(CIP NO. 8304)
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11.8 RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF PROJECT
2024-1135 (4200 LOWELL STREET)
78 A PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY
CONSISTING OF A 185 SQUARE FOOT 8 FOOT HIGH EQUIPMENT

SHELTER AND ASSOCIATED ANTENNAE MOUNTED ON A LIGHT
POLE AT 4200 LOWELL STREET, APN 475-050-06-00, IN THE
URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R1) ZONE
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.9 RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF PROJECT
2025-0903 (GROSSMONT SHOPPING CENTER)
90 PHASE 1 OF THE GROSSMONT SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT;
5500 GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE, (APNS 490-261-09-00 AND 490- 261-10-00) IN THE C-G-D (GENERAL COMMMERCIAL /

GROSSMONT OVERLAY / URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.10 RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF PROJECT 2025-0498 (6957 UNIVERSITY AVENUE)
112

A REDESIGN OF A PROPOSED TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL
BUILDING LOCATED AT 6957 UNIVERSITY AVENUE IN THE

GENERAL COMMERCIAL (URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY / MIXED USE

OVERLAY) ZONE
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.11 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING MAP FOR 9365 CARMICHAEL DRIVE
118

APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF TITLE 24 OF THE LA MESA

MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED
9365 CARMICHAEL DRIVE (APN 495-335-05-00) SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL/SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY (R1S-P)
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

11.12 RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING SB1205 REPORTING

COMPLIANCE WITH THE ANNUAL INSPECTION OF CERTAIN
OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF

THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
122
Staff Reference: Chief Koch
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11.13 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER

INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT FOR THE OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $175,000
126
Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

12. ORDINANCE: FIRST READING

12.1 ORDINANCE RENAMING COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT

AND COMMISSION AND UPDATING SUPERVISORY

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE OF

PARK AREAS
171

CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL
CODE (INCLUDING CHAPTER 2.32, SECTION 2.16.15(D)(6),
CHAPTERS 9.04, 9.05, AND 9.06) TO DO THE FOLLOWING: (1) RENAME (A) "COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT" TO "PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT," (B) "COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMISSION" TO "PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION," AND
(C) "DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES" TO "DIRECTOR OF
PARKS AND RECREATION;" AND, (2) SHIFT THE SUPERVISORY

RESPONSIBILITY OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK

AREAS TO THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE
Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:

Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

13. HEARING/ORDINANCE: FIRST READING

13.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 17.12 OF THE LA

MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADJUST THE SCHEDULE OF SEWER
SERVICE CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026 AND 2027
177
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
(1) Approve the proposed sewer rate increase of 5.96 percent for Fiscal Year 2026, and 5.04 percent for Fiscal Year 2027; and (2) Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

14. HEARING

14.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2025-2029

CONSOLIDATED PLAN
243

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE

CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR
THE PLANNING PERIOD JULY 2025 THROUGH JUNE 2029, THE
PROGRAM YEAR 2025-2026 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM,

AND THE AMENDMENT TO THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
(CPP), AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL TO THE UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)
Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution adopting the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan which includes the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan and amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan.

15. COUNCIL INITIATED

15.1 CONSIDERATION OF REQUIRING COUNCIL APPROVAL TO

CANCEL AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR

AGREEMENTS - COUNCILMEMBER CAZARES AND

COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
375

16. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)

17. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))

18. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS

19. ADJOURNMENT

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PARKING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION TO UPDATE PARKING METER

RATES, PARKING PERMIT PRICING AND PARKING

PERMIT PROGRAM GUIDELINES IN PARKING

DISTRICT ONE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY:

Issue:

Should the City Council consider a Parking Commission Recommendation to update parking meter rates, parking permit pricing and parking permit program guidelines in Parking District One?
Recommendation:

Consider a Parking Commission recommendation to update parking meter rates, parking permit pricing and parking permit program guidelines in Parking District One.

Fiscal Impact:

The Parking Fund (Fund) was established for the collection of moneys from parking meters, parking permits and parking enforcement in Parking District One (District). Funding is used for the maintenance and improvement of public facilities, including public parking lots, traffic signals and equipment, parking technology, and maintenance of common areas. Revenue from parking meters is the largest contributor to the Fund, so an adjustment to meter rates will have the most impact on the Fund. If an adjustment to meter rates is adopted, the amount of additional revenue generated is dependent on the new meter rate. Revenue from parking permits is significantly less, therefore an adjustment to parking permit pricing will have less impact on the Fund.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 7
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

BACKGROUND:

Parking District One (District) was established in 1963 pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951 that allows cities to form parking districts and levy assessments to finance the acquisition, improvement and construction of parking lots and facilities within a district.

The boundary of La Mesa’s parking district is shown on the map below.

There is a total of 433 parking meters on streets and in three of the City’s four municipal parking lots that control and regulate parking between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. every day except Sundays and holidays. The Lemon Avenue Municipal Parking Lot uses a QR-code parking management system and therefore does not have parking meters. Rates for the majority of parking meters are $0.75 per hour except for Allison Avenue, the Allison Avenue Municipal Parking Lot and the La Mesa Boulevard Municipal Parking Lot, which charge $0.50 per hour.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 7
Parking Permit Program Guidelines were established in the 1980’s to manage the supply of parking in the District. The goal of the program is to provide business owners and employees with parking options in designated areas and to improve parking availability for business customers. These designated areas are located away from convenient customer parking zones in the core of the District (La Mesa Boulevard between Acacia Avenue and 4th Street) to discourage employee parking in these areas, reduce “block circling”, and improve parking turnover for customers. Permits are priced at a discount and only available to businesses and employees in the District.

In accordance with Section 12.56.120 of the La Mesa Municipal Code, a parking fund was established for the collection of parking meter revenue in the District. Revenue from parking meters can be used for public improvements and the enhancement of facilities in the District, the maintenance and operation of parking meters, maintenance of infrastructure such as streets, traffic signals, public parking lots and off-street parking facilities. It can also be used for events, programs and advertising in the District.

DISCUSSION:

The La Mesa Community Parking Commission (Commission) acts in an advisory capacity to the City Council regarding parking-related matters within the District. The Commission’s 2025 Work Plan includes a review of parking meter rates and parking permit pricing with the goal of making a recommendation to City Council to update these charges, including an update to the Parking Permit Program Guidelines. The last update to parking meter rates in the District occurred in 2010 and the Parking Permit Program Guidelines was last updated in 2020.

Parking Meter Rates
With staff assistance, the Commission conducted research on parking meter rates in the region to analyze comparable pricing. The following table shows meter rates for cities/agencies in San Diego County that operate them:

City/Agency Days Hours Rate
*Chula Vista Mon-Sat 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. $0.75/hour
Del Mar Mon-Sun 8:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. $3.00/hour
*La Mesa Mon-Sat 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. $0.75/hour
Oceanside Mon-Sun 6:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. $1.50/hour
Port of San Diego Mon-Sun 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. $2.50/hour San Diego Mon-Sat 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. $2.50/hour
*Chula Vista operates 10-hour meters at a rate of $0.50 cents per hour; La Mesa operates meters in some designated parking zones at a rate of $0.50 cents per hour.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 4 of 7
The remaining cities in San Diego County do not utilize parking meters but do have parking zones and facilities that regulate time-limited parking and enforce those areas by issuing citations. The mean (average) meter rate for San Diego County based on the Commission’s research at the time of this report (excluding La Mesa) is $2.05 cents per hour.

The Commission used parking meter and Fund data over the last ten years to estimate the amount of revenue that would have been collected (by year) if rates were $1.00, $1.25, or $1.50 per hour during this timeframe. The data is graphed below. This analysis is helpful in determining how Fund revenue is affected by a change in meter rates.

Fund revenue has not kept pace with the cost of infrastructure maintenance and improvements in the District, necessitating an update to meter rates. The Commission’s recommendation is for an adjustment from $0.75 to $1.50 per hour to adequately support infrastructure and facility needs in the District.

Outreach was conducted to gauge opinions and to receive feedback regarding a possible adjustment. Staff presented at the General Membership meeting of the La Mesa Village Association (LMVA) on October 9, 2025. Additionally, the LMVA assisted with outreach through email notifications to businesses, who were given the opportunity to email staff 2015 – 2024 Parking Meter Revenue Estimate by Year

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 5 of 7
to provide feedback. Staff received emails from three businesses who expressed their general support. No emails were received expressing a lack of support. Feedback from the General Meeting was supportive. Overall, business owners did not think that an increase would adversely impact their business.

Parking Permit Program
The current Parking Permit Program (Program) provides businesses and employees with access to up to 276 parking spaces in seven different locations throughout the District.

The Program provides business owners and employees whose vehicles can remain parked for an extended period of time, with a supply of parking at a discounted rate that does not conflict with prime customer parking and is not subject to time limits. Participants can purchase either a Tier 1 quarterly permit for $40 or a Tier 1 annual permit for $144.

Both Tier 1 and 2 annual permits offer a 10% discount. A Tier 1 parking permit allows for parking in four of the seven designated areas as shown below.

Once purchased online, permits are issued as placards and colored-coded for easy identification by parking enforcement. Placards are used instead of window stickers to provide business owners with the flexibility to share permits amongst their employees, thus reducing cost. However, businesses cannot share permits or purchase permits for use by another business. The placards must always be visible when parking in designated areas.

A Tier 2 parking permit allows participants to park in all seven designated areas at a cost of $60 for a quarterly permit and $216 for an annual permit as shown on the following page.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 6 of 7
A common complaint from new businesses when purchasing permits is that the tiered parking system is confusing, making it difficult to determine which permit is best for their employees. Staff and Commissioners have received feedback from businesses where employees with Tier 1 permits were unclear about where they could park and were eventually issued a citation for parking in a non-designated lot. To reduce confusion and simplify the Program for businesses, the Commission recommends eliminating the permit tiers to provide one parking permit for all seven designated areas.

Permit Program Costs. Tiered permits are offered at a significant discount to businesses and employees. For example, a Tier 1 quarterly permit holder pays about $0.65 per day to occupy one parking space for up to 10 hours versus $7.50 if paying by meter. This represents 9% of the actual cost to park. A Tier 2 quarterly permit holder pays about $0.98 per day, or about 13% of the actual cost to park. The Commission recommends providing one parking permit for all seven designated areas at a cost of $80 for a quarterly permit and $288 for an annual permit. If meter rates are adjusted to $1.50 per hour, this would represent 9% of the actual cost to park for a quarterly permit and 8% for an annual permit.

The current Program allows a business to purchase a maximum of 25 permits. Based on current permit data, no business holds 25 permits and historically businesses in the District have not required this many. The Commission recommends a maximum of five permits per business with the option to purchase additional permits after 30 days from the purchase date if they are available.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 7 of 7
CONCLUSION:

The Commission recommends the following adjustments to parking meter rates, parking permit pricing and parking permit guidelines in the District:

1. Adjust parking meter rates to $1.50 per hour

2. Eliminate the parking permit tiers and provide one parking permit for all seven parking areas at a cost of $80 per quarter or $288 annually.

3. Update the Parking Permit Program Guidelines to allow for a maximum of five permits that can be purchased per business.

Staff is seeking direction from the City Council. If directed to proceed with changes to the District, staff will return at a future meeting with the necessary documents for consideration and potential adoption of the recommended changes.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________
Amanda Lee Lyn Dedmon
Assistant City Manager Assistant to the City Manager

DATE: July 8, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
Amanda Lee, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: ANNUAL INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR OPENINGS ON THE CITY’S BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Attached is a list of applicants seeking appointment or reappointment to the City’s Boards and Commissions as part of the annual recruitment process. The deadline to apply was July 1st, and this list includes all individuals who submitted applications by that date.

Applicants have been invited to attend the meeting and provide a brief, three-minute presentation highlighting their qualifications and interest in serving.

Each applicant will be called forward by the City Clerk. Following their presentation, Councilmembers may ask questions, if desired.

Appointments are scheduled to be made at the Council meeting on Tuesday, July 22nd.

Attachment

A number of applicants listed more than one board or commission of interest.

Arts and Culture Commission: Two (2) positions – four-year terms  One position represents the Art Educator (Kindergarten through 8th Grade) (AE-K-8 th)
 One position represents the Art Educator (9th Grade through College) (AE -9 th
-C)
*Pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 2.87, Arts and Culture Commission: “If these particular appointments cannot be made and consequently vacancies occur, the remaining vacancies may be appointed at large.”
At-Large (A)
Visual Arts (VA)
Performing Arts (PA)
Musical Arts (MA)
The Commission shall consist of seven appointed members as follows:
 Two members to be art educators (one kindergarten through 8th grade, one 9th grade through college)
 One member to represent the visual arts; one member to represent the performing arts  One member to represent the musical arts
 Two members to be at large.

Members shall be either a La Mesa resident, employed at a place of business in La Mesa with a direct relationship to the Arts and Culture Commission membership categories, OR serve in a volunteer capacity at a non-profit organization in La Mesa with a direct relationship to the arts and Culture Commission membership categories
First Appointed Number of Terms
Renee Bareno (A)(VA)
Patrick R. de la Torre (A)
Alison Lindsay (AE – K-8
th)(A) – incumbent 01-25-22 Partial
Emma McClees (A)
Brittany Morrow (A)
Tristan Reed (A)(VA)
Stacey Turner (AE – K-8
th)(A)(VA)(MA)
Community Services Commission: Two (2) positions – four-year terms Members must be resident electors of City of La Mesa and are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code. One appointee shall be nominated by the Grossmont Union High School District.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Robin Ellam
Cassandra Neel
Marc Regier

Design Review Board: One (1) position – three-year term Members shall be design professionals, which are defined as registered architect or landscape architect, building designer, urban designer or urban planner. Members are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Patrick R. de la Torre
Environmental Sustainability Commission: One (1) position – four-year terms  One position represents the professional category (P).

Seven of the members shall be residents of the City of La Mesa and be comprised as follows:
two members from the general populous; three members with professional experience related to environmental sustainability; one member representing the senior adult population (at time of appointment shall be not less than fifty-five years of age); and one member representing the youth population (at the time of appointment shall be not more than 21 years of age).

First Appointed Number of Terms
Michael Bourton (P) – incumbent 01-14-20 1+partial
Lara Dickens (P)
Robin Ellam (P)
La Mesa Community Parking Commission: One (1) position – four-year term  One position represents the general population (G).

Two members shall be at-large members and three members shall be business representatives, property owners, or residents residing in the CD/D Downtown Commercial Zone. Members are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Patrick R. de la Torre
Tristan Reed
Stacey A. Turner

Mobility Commission: Two (2) positions – four-year terms Members must be resident electors of the City of La Mesa and are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Mike Calandra - incumbent 07-09-13 3
Philip Cavello
Patrick R. de la Torre
Emma McClees
Brittany Morrow
Stacey A. Turner
Nescett Wright
Personnel Appeals Board: One (1) position – three-year terms Members shall be resident electors of the City of La Mesa and are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Jocelyn Watkins 07-28-20 1+partial
Planning Commission: Two (2) positions – four-year terms Members must be resident electors of the City of La Mesa and are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Patrick R. de la Torre
Robin Ellam
David Harris – incumbent 07-25-23 Partial
Tristan Reed
Marc Regier
APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

DATE: July 8, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE UNSCHEDULED

VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
On June 10, 2025, the City Council interviewed an applicant who was interested in being appointed to fill the Police Beat 4 vacancy on the City’s Community Police Oversight Board. At the July 8, 2025 City Council meeting, the Mayor will make the appointment with the approval of the City Council.

Attached is a brief description of the requirements, the number of openings, and the name of the applicant seeking to be appointed.

Staff recommends the Mayor make the appointment to fill the vacancy, with the approval of the City Council, and adopt the attached resolution confirming the appointment.

Attachments

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPOINTING

A MEMBER TO FILL THE UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY

POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
___________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, a position on the Community Police Oversight Board has been vacated; and WHEREAS, the person below has been recommended to the City Council for appointment to said City of La Mesa Board.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the following is hereby appointed as a member of the Community Police Oversight Board, with their term to commence after the oath or affirmation of allegiance for public officers or employees is executed as required by Article XX, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California, and to expire on the dates stated below, or until their successor is appointed and qualified:

Community Police Oversight Board: One (1) appointment
(Name) is to fill the Police Beat 4 vacant seat with term ending December 31, 2025 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

A number of applicants listed more than one board or commission of interest.

Community Police Oversight Board: One (1) position – two-year term One appointee will fill the unscheduled vacancy for Police Beat 4, with term set to expire on December 31, 2025.

Eleven of the members shall be residents of the City of La Mesa and be comprised as follows:
 One representative from each of the four police beat areas of the City  One representative of a La Mesa faith-based community  One representative of the La Mesa business community
 One adult employee or designee of Helix Charter High School  One adult employee or designee of the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District  One young adult between the ages of 18 to 30
 One advocate for people experiencing homelessness, substance abuse, mental health or other social issues
 One senior aged 62 or older
First Appointed Number of Terms
Todd McCully (Police Beat 4)
THE APPLICATION IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Special Meeting
Date:

Location:

May 27, 2025, 5:00 p.m.

Council Chambers and City Manager's Conference Room
City Hall, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.

3. OPEN SESSION

3.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
Agency Negotiator: Ms. Spaniol
Employee Organizations:

Unrepresented Employees
La Mesa City Employees Association

3.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR

2 AUTHORITY: Government Code 54956.8
PROPERTY: Assessor's Parcel Number 494-240-4500; 8213
University Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942
CITY NEGOTIATOR: City Manager
TO NEGOTIATE WITH: Steven Sell
UNDER NEGOTIATION: Possible sale of referenced City-owned property
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 5:03 p.m.

Councilmember Cazares arrived to the meeting at 5:05 p.m.

4. CLOSED SESSION

4.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
Agency Negotiator: Ms. Spaniol
Employee Organizations:

Unrepresented Employees,
La Mesa City Employees Association

4.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
AUTHORITY: Government Code 54956.8
PROPERTY: Assessor's Parcel Number 494-240-4500; 8213
University Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942
CITY NEGOTIATOR: City Manager
TO NEGOTIATE WITH: Steven Sell
UNDER NEGOTIATION: Possible sale of referenced City-owned property
The meeting reconvened at 5:21 p.m. with all members present.

5. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Sabine announced there were no reportable actions.

6. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 5:21 p.m.

3 _________________________
City Clerk

1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Date:

Location:

May 27, 2025, 6:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items can be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Sabine announced there were no reportable actions.

3. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

4. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

2 The Mayor, Council and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

5. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

6. PRESENTATIONS

6.1 PRESENTATION OF THE SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL AWARDS -

MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS
Mayor Arapostathis, Chief Sweeney, Lieutenant Higgins and Master Officer Wilson presented the Safety Patrol Awards to:

Jordan Garcia, Rolando Elementary School
Bella Wedge, Lemon Avenue Elementary School
Sterling Santoyo, Northmont Elementary School

6.2 PROCLAIMING JUNE 2025 AS LGBTQ+ PRIDE MONTH
Councilmember Cazares read a proclamation declaring June 2025 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month and invited everyone to attend the 5th Annual Pride Flag Raising at City Hall on June 3, 2025, at 8:30 a.m.

6.3 PROCLAIMING MAY 27, 2025, AS THE LA MESA WOMAN'S CLUB DAY
Vice Mayor Dillard read and presented the proclamation declaring May 27, 2025, as La Mesa Woman's Club Day to La Mesa Woman's Club CoPresidents Marsha McDonald and Sandi Phoenix.

La Mesa Woman's Club Co-Presidents Marsha McDonald and Sandi Phoenix shared an overview of the Club’s ongoing service to the community and expressed their appreciation to the City Council for recognizing and honoring the Club with the proclamation.

7. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Richard Hart thanked the Council for its efforts in addressing fire hazards and homeless encampments in Tungsten Canyon through planned modifications, and gave special recognition to Code Compliance Officer Ellis for their outstanding work.

Tom Villarreal raised concerns about safety and traffic issues throughout the City.

3 Brenda Hammond encouraged everyone to keep smiling, expressed her gratitude to the Police Department, and shared her excitement for the upcoming Sundays at Six Concerts series.

8. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
Councilmember Cazares stated that, while she does not have a conflict of interest under Government Code Section 87100, she previously lobbied on Senate Bill 569 and, as a result, would not participate in the discussion or vote on Item 11.1.

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
MaryAnn spoke on Item 10.4.

Cindy Maina spoke on Item 10.4.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.7)
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 10.4).

Item 10.4 was considered separately upon the City Attorney's recommendation.

Councilmember Lothian asked Director of Community Development Santos about the differences in the number of permits issued across the various quarters as reported in Item 10.5. Director of Community Development Santos responded to her questions.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.7, except for Item 10.4.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

4 10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR

MEETING AND THE LA MESA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
SPECIAL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2025
Approve.

10.3 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 13, 2025
Approve.

10.5 PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
Receive and file.

10.6 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BIDDER FOR BID 25-16 AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 2025 SLURRY
PROJECT TO AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH, INC.

Resolution No. 2025-053
Adopt Resolution.

10.7 ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY OF LA MESA HOUSING ASSET

AUDITED FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ADDENDUM TO THE
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR JUNE 30, 2023
Receive and file.

10.4 *ORDINANCE REZONING 9407 JERICHO ROAD

SECOND READING AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF TITLE 24 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE,
REZONING 9407 JERICHO ROAD (APN 486-670-18-00) FROM ZONE R1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) TO ZONE R3 (MULTIPLE UNIT

RESIDENTIAL)
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
Close the hearing.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

5 Ordinance No. 2025-2917
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Dillard
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, and Councilmember Suzuki
Against (1): Councilmember Lothian
Approved (4 to 1)

11. COUNCIL INITIATED

11.1 CONSIDERATION OF SENDING A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOR SENATE BILL 569
(BLAKESPEAR) - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: HOMELESS

ENCAMPMENTS - COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
Domenic Provence, President of La Mesa Firefighters Local 4759, spoke on behalf of the organization in support of the Council's endorsement of Senate Bill 569 and explained the reasons behind their support for the bill.

Councilmember Suzuki provided a brief explanation regarding her request for Council support of Senate Bill 569.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Mairs Ryan submitted a comment in opposition to Council support of Senate Bill 569, warning that it would worsen veteran homelessness by dismantling encampments without offering adequate alternatives or services.

Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Mayor Arapostathis
Direct staff to prepare a letter of support for Senate Bill 569 (Blakespear):

Department of Transportation: homeless encampments, authorize the Mayor to sign the letter on behalf of the entire City Council, and direct staff to send the letter to the Governor, the City’s legislative representatives, and the bill’s authors.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki

6 Abstain (1): Councilmember Cazares
Approved (4 to 0)

11.2 CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO AGENDIZE A

QUARTERLY UPDATE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN
Councilmember Lothian recommended quarterly updates to the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program to enhance transparency, improve communication with residents, and ensure more timely inclusion of newly submitted petitions, along with a clearer listing of the specific traffic calming measures requested.

Moved By Councilmember Lothian
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
Direct staff to update and present the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program ("NTMP") priority list to the City Council on a quarterly basis; add a new column identifying the specific traffic calming measures requested for each street; and include a legend explaining the three phases of the program.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

13. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
There were no reports.

14. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m.

7 _________________________
City Clerk

1 La Mesa City Council, La Mesa Public Financing Authority, and City of La Mesa Successor Agency
Meeting Minutes
Date:

Location:

June 10, 2025, 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items can be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

2 4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

5. PRESENTATION

5.1 PROCLAIMING JUNE 19TH AS JUNETEENTH NATIONAL

INDEPENDENCE DAY
Vice Mayor Dillard read the proclamation declaring June 19 as Juneteenth National Independence Day.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Elliot Gonzalez spoke regarding undocumented immigrants and immigration laws.

Ted Childers spoke about fire hazard concerns and the presence of homeless encampments in the Tungsten Canyon area.

Grant Affleck spoke about the efforts of the Trauma Intervention Program ("TIP") of San Diego County.

Barbie Wheeler spoke about ongoing issues involving a house on Bellflower Drive.

Cassandra Koldewyn announced the La Mesa Library’s summer programs and events.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS

8.1 INTERVIEW OF APPLICANT FOR AN UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON

THE COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
City Clerk Wiegelman briefly explained the interview process.

Todd McCully spoke regarding their qualifications and interest in being appointed to the Community Police Oversight Board.

City Clerk Wiegelman said the appointment would be made at a future City Council meeting.

Following the interview, no action was taken.

3 9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Christopher Glenn submitted a comment on Item 10.6.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.13)
Moved by Councilmember Cazares
Seconded by Mayor Arapostathis
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.13.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

10.2 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM
GRANT OF $30,264 FOR TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS
Resolution No. 2025-054
Adopt Resolution.

10.3 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM -
URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE GRANT OF $36,347
Resolution No. 2025-055
Adopt Resolution.

10.4 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF ULTRASONIC

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT CLEANER GRANT AWARD

FROM THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE FOUNDATION IN THE
AMOUNT OF $21,477.58
Resolution No. 2025-056
Adopt Resolution.

4 10.5 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

LEASE AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE FOR
THE USE OF FIRE STATION 11 TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT AND

UPDATE THE RENEWAL DATES AND AMOUNT OF THE ANNUAL

INCREASE
Resolution No. 2025-057
Adopt Resolution.

10.6 RESOLUTION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO DUDEK FOR CLEARING

AND REMOVING OF VEGETATION IN THE EASTRIDGE OPEN SPACE

EASEMENT
Resolution No. 2025-058
Adopt Resolution.

10.7 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
Resolution No. 2025-059
Adopt Resolution.

10.8 RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO HARRIS AND

ASSOCIATES FOR WASTEWATER UTILITY BILLING, ANNUAL

ADMINISTRATION AND RELATED SERVICES
Resolution No. 2025-060
Adopt Resolution.

10.9 RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO SNIPES-DYE

ASSOCIATES FOR ROADWAY AND SITE DESIGN SERVICES FOR

THE EL PASO STREET/HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
Resolution No. 2025-061
Adopt Resolution.

10.10 RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR STREET SWEEPING

SERVICES WITH SWEEPING CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Resolution No. 2025-062
Adopt Resolution.

5 10.11 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHWEST SIGNAL SERVICE, INC. FOR

TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND

RELATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Resolution No. 2025-063
Adopt Resolution.

10.12 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHWEST SIGNAL SERVICE, INC. FOR

STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENCY REPAIRS
Resolution No. 2025-064
Adopt Resolution.

10.13 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO D-MAX
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DRY WEATHER MS4 OUTFALL

MONITORING AND PERSISTENT FLOW PROGRAM
Resolution No. 2025-065
Adopt Resolution.

11. STAFF REPORT - CITY COUNCIL - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY -

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

11.1 CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY BIENNIAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025-2027
City Manager Humora began the presentation by outlining the preliminary budget priorities, which support La Mesa’s Strategic Plan Workplan through a pragmatic two-year approach. The budget proposed adding 15 new positions across various departments to meet the needs of a growing community, with a particular emphasis on protecting public safety. It also included investments in infrastructure and community programs such as the Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement Program ("HOME"), the recently updated Climate Action Plan ("CAP"), the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program ("NTMP"), and the La Mesa Entrepreneurship Accelerator Program ("LEAP"). City Manager Humora concluded by thanking the community for its strong approval of Proposition L, which will help sustain city services.

Interim Finance Director Herrera provided an overview of the 2025–2027 Preliminary Budget, noting the City’s strong fiscal position, with a balanced

6 $76.5 million General Fund and a fully funded $122.8 million citywide budget. He reported that the $49.1 million Capital Improvement Program budget included 90 projects spanning transportation, facilities, storm drains, parks, and other areas. The budget proposed 15 new staff positions and maintained General Fund reserves well above the City’s policy thresholds. Staff noted they would incorporate City Council feedback and return with a final budget for adoption within 90 days.

Director of Human Resources Spaniol provided a staffing update as part of the FY 2026–2027 Budget presentation, reporting that 50 new full-time employees had joined the City in the current fiscal year and 7 internal promotions had occurred, with key hires in Public Works, Police, Fire, and Community Development. She noted that while 17 positions remained vacant, recruitment efforts were actively underway to address service needs. The proposed budget included 15 new positions and 3 reclassifications aimed at strengthening public safety, improving operational efficiency, and enhancing internal capacity across multiple departments.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Councilmember Cazares, with Council consensus, directed staff to include in the final budget funding to replace Fire Engine 13 and approximately $20,000 to equip the Urban Search and Rescue 12 apparatus as a Type 1 unit.
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY BIENNIAL
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR THAT BEGINS JULY 1, 2025,
AND ENDS JUNE 30, 2027
Resolution No. 2025-066
Moved by Vice Mayor Dillard
Seconded by Mayor Arapostathis
Adopt Resolution and direct staff to return with any amendments in August with the 2025-2027 Final Budget.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki Approved (5 to 0)

7 b. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

COMPENSATION PLAN, LISTING CLASSIFICATION

RANGES/BANDS AND PAY STEPS
Resolution No. 2025-067
Moved by Vice Mayor Dillard
Seconded by Councilmember Cazares
Adopt Resolution.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki Approved (5 to 0)

11.2 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING (1) THE
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026, AND (2) THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS USED TO

CALCULATE THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Resolution No. 2025-068
Moved by Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded by Councilmember Suzuki
Adopt Resolution pursuant to Propositions 4 and 111, establishing the Gann Spending Limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, using the growth factor for new Non-Residential Construction in the City of La Mesa, and the inflation rate in the City of La Mesa, as the annual adjustment factors used to compute the Appropriations Limit.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

12. HEARING

12.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2025-2029

CONSOLIDATED PLAN

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATED

PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PLANNING
PERIOD JULY 2025 TO JUNE 2029 AND THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR CDBG FUNDING AND CITIZEN

8 PARTICIPATION PLAN (CPP) FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FUNDING PROGRAMS
Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice.

Mayor Arapostathis opened the hearing for Item 12.1.

Senior Management Analyst Pina presented the draft 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan, a federally required document that guides the City’s use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds based on identified housing, economic development, infrastructure, and community service needs. She explained that the plan was developed using data analysis and community outreach and includes a strategic plan, needs assessment, market analysis, and the first annual action plan for FY 2025–2026. For that fiscal year, the City received $456,031 in CDBG funds, which must be used to benefit low- to moderate-income residents, eliminate blight, or address urgent needs. Staff requested Council comments and direction to return on July 8 for final review and approval.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved by Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded by Councilmember Cazares
Close the hearing.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
Moved by Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded by Vice Mayor Dillard
(1) Review and provide input on the draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan, and Citizen Participation Plan; and (2) Direct staff to return on July 8, 2025, for final review and approval.

Yes (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Dillard, Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)

9 13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
There were no reports.

15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

16. ADJOURNMENT
At 7:05 p.m., Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting in honor and memory of former Mayor Art Madrid, recognizing his decades of dedicated public service, leadership, and lasting contributions to the La Mesa community. _________________________
City Clerk

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO CHEN
RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PERFORM TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE INDUSTRIAL

AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(WALKABILITY STUDY)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa award a task order to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., in the amount of $150,000 to perform traffic engineering services for the Industrial Area Roadway Improvement Project (Walkability Study)?
Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution awarding a task order to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., in the amount of $150,000 to perform traffic engineering services for the Industrial Area Roadway Improvement Project (Walkability Study).

Fiscal Impact:

CIP Project No. 8322, Industrial Area Walkability Study, is funded by Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation (RMRA SB1). No general fund money will be used for this project.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.  Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
BACKGROUND:

The Industrial Area Roadway Improvements project is focused on a historically industrialzoned district in La Mesa. This area is in center of the city, north of the I-8 Freeway and includes Center Street, Commercial Street and Guild Street. These streets (shown in Attachment C) are the backbone transportation routes for the industrial and commercial uses of the area. One of the long-term goals of the sidewalk master plan is to provide improved walking accessibility and connectivity to the Spring Street corridor and the Village. This work is in conjunction with improving the roadway for heavy vehicle loads and addressing legacy parking configurations.

DISCUSSION:

In May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications (RFQ 25-01) for as-needed engineering consultant services. Chen Ryan Associates, Inc was selected as one of the qualified firms to provide services. On June 6, 2025, Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. submitted a proposal for services associated with the Industrial Area Roadway Improvements Project and was subsequently found to be the most highly qualified firm for this work. The proposed scope of work includes identifying feasible, cost-effective strategies to improve pedestrian safety, walkability, and potential bicycle access in the project area. Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., proposal is included as Attachment B.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends adopting a resolution awarding a task order to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., in the amount of $150,000 to perform traffic engineering services for the Industrial Area Roadway Improvement Project (Walkability Study).

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ______________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Tristan Leger, PE
Associate Engineer
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. CRA Proposal
C. Site Plan

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 3

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE INDUSTRIAL AREA

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (WALKABILITY STUDY)
WHEREAS, the industrial area has blossoming businesses that would benefit from improved parking and pedestrian access;
WHEREAS, there is no safe path of travel for pedestrians through the industrial area currently;
WHEREAS, in April 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications RFQ 25-01 for as-needed engineering services;
WHEREAS, Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., was selected as a qualified firm to provide asneeded traffic engineering services; WHEREAS, the terms of the master agreement allow for the issuance of task orders to authorize specific items of work on an as-needed basis to the selected consultants; and WHEREAS, a scope of work and fee were negotiated with Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. to provide a walkability study for the Industrial Area Roadway Improvements Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a contract with Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. to provide traffic engineering services for the Industrial Area Roadway Improvements project in the amount of $150,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310 | San Diego, CA 92103 | (619) 795-6086 www.CRAMobility.com
June 6, 2025
City of La Mesa
Attn: Tristan Leger
[email protected]
Re: City of La Mesa As-Needed Request for a Walkability Study Dear Tristan,
Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., dba CR Associates (“CRA”) is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of La Mesa ( “City”) to prepare a Walkability Study to inform the planned enhancements for the area around the City’s Public Works complex.

Project Understanding
We understand that the goal of this study is to identify strategies for facilitating and protecting pedestrians and potentially cyclists once the planned redevelopment for this area is implemented. Our technical approach begins with an extensive existing conditions analysis and close collaboration with staff to understand the planned improvements for the area and the desired outcomes in terms of multimodal connectivity and walkability. This will form the foundation for defining and understanding the purpose and objectives of the project. On a high level, our engineering objective will be to identify and develop feasible, cost-effective options for improving the streets within the project area and transforming them into a safe, welcoming environment for walking and biking. We will work with the City to identify the improvements that best optimize safety and connectivity and prepare 30% plans and accompanying cost estimate, which can be advanced through final design when funding is available.

Scope of Services
The tasks below are intended to be used as the scope items for the task order and to indicate our assumptions, and deliverables to be completed. Design plans, reports, and deliverables indicated will follow the City’s standard format unless indicated otherwise.

Task 1 – Project Management

1.1 Kick-Off Meeting - As soon as the Notice-to-Proceed is received, the CRA Team will schedule a kick-off meeting.

In advance of the meeting, CRA will submit a draft agenda and data request memo based on previous discussions with the City. This will likely include any current development projects and identified future plans for public works grounds/space.

1.2 On-going Project Management – CRA will establish a regular monthly meeting time to advance the project and ensure the team is on track with respect to schedule, decision-making, and design / deliverables development. As part of this task, CRA will submit invoices on a time and materials basis.

Task 1 Deliverables:
- Kick-off meeting
- Agendas, minutes, and action items for kick-off, monthly, and stakeholder meetings. - Monthly project coordination meetings
- As-needed coordination meetings with Caltrans, property owners, and other stakeholders - Monthly invoices and progress reports

Task 2 – Existing Conditions and Data collection
CRA will conduct thorough data collection to inform the development of an existing conditions memo. This task will include a review of available topographic and right-of-way survey data, existing planning documents, utility mapping, and as-built drawings. CRA will also conduct a field review to verify as-built drawings and utility maps, and observe existing driveway access, parking conditions, , environmental constraints, Caltrans facilities, and the general operations and character of the study’s roadways. We understand that the City has pavement cores along Commercial Street which we will analyze to determine the existing pavement section. Data collection may also include identifying and gathering design guidelines, design information bulletins (Caltrans), etc as needed.

CRA will develop an existing conditions memo that includes initial findings with respect to the walking and bicycle environment and opportunities and barriers. The initial review and field review will result in a CAD base with a series of cross sections that highlight existing conditions as well as proposed opportunity. Lighting will be assessed to confirm minimum visibility for proposed improvements.

Key considerations:
- Parking maximization
- PROWAG and accessibility
- Discussion and recommendations to Caltrans to potentially improve on/off ramps to comply with Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 94 (DIB-94)
o Assessment of turn radii, lane widths, other areas of deficiency, etc. o Assumption is that the City would not take on responsibility for the ramps - Safety including lighting and connectivity
- Green streets implementation and drainage

2.1 – Topographic Survey and Right-of-Way Mapping
CRA will review City provided survey and Right-of-Way mapping AutoCAD files. CRA will also utilize the mapping and as-builts collected as part of the SANDAG La Mesa Downtown Trolley Prioritization Study.

2.2 – Utility Research
CRA will coordinate with the City and affected utility agencies to collect readily available record drawings and data such as GIS mapping, utility maps, as-built plans, and future improvement plans within and adjacent to the Project area. CRA will assist the City in preparing and sending utility notification letters to obtain mapping from franchise utilities. Information gathered as part of this task will be incorporated into the existing utility base AutoCAD file.

2.3 – Field Observation
The CRA team will conduct up to two (2) field observations of the project area and take inventory of existing facilities.

2.4 – Multimodal Analysis
CRA will ass the mobility for the project area related to walking, bicycling, accessibility and parking. These areas of evaluation assumes the potential for future development and how the public right-of-way improvements will enhance broader connectivity. CRA will develop a needs analysis and recommendations memo based on the existing conditions and data collection. CRA will meet with City staff to review and discuss before revising the alternatives to a preferred alternative that is moved forward to Task 3.

Task 2 Deliverables:
- Existing Conditions Memo
- Multimodal Recommendations including but not limited to walking, bicycling, accessibility, and parking - Existing Utility Base File
- Field notes, field photos
Task 3 – Construction Documents

3.1 Preliminary Engineering (30%)
The CRA team will develop a Preliminary Engineering (30%) design package including a plan set depicting proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, signing and striping improvements over the City-provided topographic survey base map

prepared in Task 2 as well as a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) based on the preliminary design quantity takeoffs and current unit prices. The preliminary OPCC will identify itemized infrastructure items, unit prices, appropriate contingencies, expected project development and construction management costs, and anticipated escalation based on expected construction date. The Preliminary Engineering Layout Plan will be in plan view and will portray the proposed edge curbs, curb and gutters, sidewalk pavement, striping improvements, and potential utility conflicts within the limit of work. The plans will show potential storm drain and green infrastructure improvements but it assumes the required drainage or stormwater quality analysis will be prepared at the final design stage. This task assumes four improvement sheets and one detail sheet.

The CRA team will prepare one (1) photometric study in the form of an exhibit to determine appropriate lighting levels within the proposed improvement limits. The photometric analysis will depict placement of existing and proposed roadway lighting using Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) lighting standards and standard City of La Mesa light fixtures. Other lighting features such as conduit runs, voltage drop calculations, service points, etc. will not be shown. It is assumed that up to one (1) round of comments will be received from the City of La Mesa.

The Preliminary Engineering improvement plan (30%) will be revised based on one (1) round of consolidated City review and comments. CRA will schedule a meeting following the submittal to discuss and reconcile comments. This assumes a comment resolution meeting with revisions.

Task 3 Deliverables:
- Preliminary Engineering (30%) plan set – 11x17 PDF and CAD base files will be submitted electronically via email
- Preliminary OPCC as an excel file (file will be submitted electronically via email) - Photometric study – (file will be submitted electronically via email) - Comment response log – (file will be on SharePoint as a living document) Project Schedule
Once provided with the notice to proceed by the Client, CRA will schedule a kickoff meeting as soon as possible to gain a better understanding of the Client’s vision and goals for this grant and identify a step-by-step schedule (MS Project Schedule) including review time in order to meet City’s desired timeframe. CRA has a team ready to execute this work immediately.

Fee
The CRA team will perform the scope of services outlined above on a time-and materials basis under the terms of the 25-01 as needed master agreement rates, with a maximum not to exceed fee of One-hundred and fiftythousand dollars ($150,000.00).

Additional Services
Any services not specifically described in the above scope, as well as any changes in the scope the Client requests, will be considered as Additional Services and will be performed at our then-current hourly rates. Prior to commencing Additional Services, Consultant shall obtain prior written approval from the Client. Additional services we can provide include, but are not limited to providing any other services not expressly included in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted practices in the industry.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to helping the City reenvision this area to be more pedestrian and bike friendly.

Sincerely,
Monique Chen, PE
Principal

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: - ISSUED: .

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
SECTION 4216 & 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE @ 1-800-422-4133 TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG.

WEB ADDRESS: WWW.DIGALERT.ORG
SCANNED BY: . DATE: . FILE LOCATION: .

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT
AMENDMENT TO NV5 TO PERFORM APPRAISAL

REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE GROSSMONT CENTER

DRIVE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING PROJECT
(CIP NO. 8309)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa approve a contract amendment to NV5 to perform appraisal review services for the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Rehabilitation and Widening Project (CIP No. 8309) in the amount of $46,804.84? Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution approving a contract amendment to NV5 to perform appraisal review services for the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Rehabilitation and Widening Project (CIP No. 8309) in the amount of $46,804.84.

Fiscal Impact:

Change Order No. 5 to the agreement for CIP No. 8309, Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Rehabilitation and Widening Project, will be funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) grant, with 11.47% required matching funds coming from HUTA gas tax. No general fund money will be used for this project.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 T-1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Development BACKGROUND:

In April 2013, the City was awarded Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) grant funding, administered by Caltrans, to review the feasibility of rehabilitating and widening the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge. The project aims to enhance safety, install sidewalks and bike lanes, and extend the service life of the bridge, supporting the goals of the City’s Climate Action Plan and Vision Zero.

Preliminary design work determined that full bridge widening would be necessary to meet current standards and accommodate sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of the bridge. In March 2017, additional design funds were approved by Caltrans.

In April 2021, the City was awarded an additional $1,050,000 in HBP funds (less local matching funds) to complete the final design and right-of-way acquisition. The right-ofway phase includes obtaining railroad clearance from MTS/SD&AE Railroad, whose facilities are spanned by the bridge.

In September 2020, NV5 was selected as the project design consultant. Since then, there have been four contract change orders to address unforeseen engineering challenges, Caltrans audit findings, address MTS catenary design and traffic signal modifications, and services for right-of-way mapping.

DISCUSSION:

The attached contract amendment, Change Order No. 5, provides for additional right-ofway services related to temporary construction easements. Specifically, the amendment covers appraisal certifications and adjustments to temporary easement boundaries to better accommodate the needs of adjacent private property owners.

These refinements are necessary to ensure the project proceeds efficiently through the right-of-way certification process and remains in compliance with FHWA and Caltrans requirements.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, approving a contract amendment to NV5 to perform appraisal review services for the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Rehabilitation and Widening Project in the amount of $46,804.84.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
___Michael Kinnard_______________
Michael Kinnard, PE
Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Proposal

RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
APPROVING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO NV5 TO PERFORM

APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING PROJECT (CIP NO. 8309)
WHEREAS, in September 2020, an RFQ was issued for final design of the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening and Rehabilitation Project. Based on experience and qualifications, the firm of NV5 was selected;
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution 2021-004 awarding design services for the Project to NV5;
WHEREAS, a task order was issued to NV5 to provide appraisal services for the Project; and
WHEREAS, additional appraisal review services are necessary to provide appraisal certifications and modifications of temporary construction easements to better accommodate adjacent private property owners working near the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of said City, a Contract Amendment for additional appraisal review services between the City of La Mesa and NV5 in an amount of $46,804.66 for the Grossmont Center Drive Rehabilitation and Widening Project. Said Contract Amendment is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025 - , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

15092 Avenue of Science, Suite 200 | San Diego, CA 92128 | www.NV5.com | Office 858.385.0500 | Fax 858.385.0400 June 6, 2025
Michael Kinnard, PE, PTOE
Engineering Project Manager
City of La Mesa City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California 91942
Subject: Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Subject: Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening –Request for Contract Amendment ( Request for Contract Amendment ( Request for Contract Amendment (Independent Independent Appraisal Review Appraisal Review Services Services Services, Acquisition Services, Escrow Coordination , Acquisition Services, Escrow Coordination, Caltra , Caltrans ROW Certification, and Project Management, Administration, and Coordination Services) on, and Coordination Services)

Dear Michael:

NV5, Inc. (NV5) is pleased to submit our proposal for the above additional services, in accordance with your request and the expanded Bender Rosental Inc. (BRI) scope of work.

This proposal covers the effort required to provide these services for this project.

This proposal includes the following four sections:

1. Background

2. Detailed Scope of Services

3. Schedule

4. Proposed Compensation
If the enclosed proposal meets with your approval, please amend our contract, and provide us with a Service Authorization Order under the terms and conditions of our existing Agreement, resolution Number 2021-004 with City of La Mesa, dated January 12, 2021. This proposal is good for 90 days.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal and look forward to our continued working relationship with you. Please feel free to call me (760) 580 8159 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
NV5, Inc.

Darab Bouzarjomehri, P.E. Mark A. Weaver, P.E. S.E.

Engineering Manager Transportation Manager

Attachments:

Attachment “A” – Bender Rosenthal Inc. Scope and Fee & Exhibit 10-H Attachment “B” – NV5 Exhibit 10-H

June 6, 2025

Background: Background:

The City of La Mesa, prior to this request, had approved and awarded the following design services fee for the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Project to NV5:

Original Contract Amount $ 211,189.90
Change Order No. 1 $ 437,610.17
Change Order No. 2 $ 27,377.18
Change Order No. 3 $ 118,118.95
Change Order No. 4 $ 33,094.00
Contract Total $ 827,390.20
On October 8, 2024, the City of La Mesa Project Manager requested that NV5, Inc. provide additional independent appraisal review services, acquisition services, escrow coordination, and Caltrans Rightof-Way Certification for the affected parcels (APNs: 490-200-26, 490-200-47, 490-260-11, and 490- 261-04) located on both sides of the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Project. Our subconsultant Bender Rosenthal Inc. (BRI) is able to perform these required services. Their proposal is attached to this request.

Detailed Detailed etailed Scope of Services Scope of Services Scope of Servicesfor NV5 for NV5 for NV5:

Task 1-Project Management Project Management Project Management and Coordination and Coordination and Coordination (NV5) NV5 will provide continuous project management and coordination with the City and subconsultant, two (2) virtual meetings, and review and submittal of invoices. NV5 will provide a total of 48 Hours of management and support during this phase.

Additional Services: Additional Services:

Additional services if required, beyond the tasks identified in the scope of BRI services such as (construction support services, consultations, etc.) will be charged on a time and material basis per the Charge Rate Schedule at the time of construction. These tasks will not commence prior to written authorization from the city.

Schedule: Schedule:

Please refer to BRI’s proposal attached.

Proposed Compensation: Proposed Compensation:

The following is the list of tasks shown above with their respective compensation amount.

FEE $$
Task 1 – Project Management, Coordination, and Support Services (NV5).………….…$13,808.18 Task 2 – Additional ROW Services (BRI)…………………...……………………………………………$32,996.66

Total Fee Total Fee $46,804.84

2825 Watt Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95821 | www.benderrosenthal.com | 916.978.4900 December 11, 2024
Jack Abcarius, PE
Associate, Project Manager | NV5 ORIGINAL BY EMAIL:
15092 Avenue of Science, Suite 200 [email protected] San Diego, CA 92128
RE: AMENDMENT REQUEST - RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT
GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT – CITY OF LA MESA APNS: 490-200-26, 490-200-47, 490-260-11, 490-261-04
Mr. Abcarius,
Bender Rosenthal, Inc. (BRI) and NV5 entered into a Professional Services Agreement on October 5, 2023, for BRI to provide Appraisal Services for the City of La Mesa (City) Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Project (Project). BRI provided three (3) appraisal reports for the fair market value of the impacted properties, two (2) of which are owned by Rainbow Investments and two (2) of which are owned by the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS).

At this time, BRI’s scope has been expanded to include updates of the three existing appraisals (Memorandums of Appraisal Updates), Independent Appraisal Review Services, Acquisition Services, Escrow Coordination and Caltrans Right of Way Certification, as well as additional Project Management. BRI is therefore respectfully requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $32,996.66 to complete this Project.

The following outlines our scope, methodology, timeline and fee.

TASK 1 - RIGHT OF WAY PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION Chip Willett, CA Real Estate Broker, will continue to serve as the Project Manager and will oversee performance of the tasks involved in the delivery of the right of way for the project.

TASK 2 – MEMORANDUMS OF APPRAISAL UPDATES
BRI will update the existing appraisals to a new date of value, including investigation, data, and analysis to support our conclusion. The properties will not be re-inspected. The Memorandums of Appraisal Updates will be prepared in conformance with, and subject to, the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which fully incorporate the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation and applicable laws.

Deliverables: Three (3) Memorandums of Appraisal Updates.

TASK 3 - INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL REVIEW SERVICES
BRI has enlisted the expertise of Sierra West Valuation, Inc. for independent appraisal review. Upon completion of the review, the original appraisal and a USPAP Standard 3 and 4 compliant review report will be provided and forwarded to NV5 for approval of Just Compensation.

Deliverables: Three (3) Independent Appraisal Review Certificates.

Attachment "A"

Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening
December 11, 2024

2825 Watt Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95821 | www.benderrosenthal.com | 916.978.4900 Task 3, Independent Appraisal Review Services, was initially an optional task, but it has already been accounted for in the budget. It will therefore not appear on the attached 10-H1 fee proposal.

TASK 4 - ACQUISITION SERVICES
Upon completion of the appraisal and establishment of just compensation, BRI will develop the contract and conveyance documents necessary to make the offers and acquire the necessary rights.

Each offer package will be reviewed internally for quality measures. BRI will then convey documents until acceptance or impasse is reached.

BRI will contact or attempt to contact each property owner at least six (6) times within the first sixty (60) days of approval to proceed and will make additional contacts by phone, e-mail or through the postal service. Finally, BRI will prepare a final file for each parcel, ensuring that it has been quality checked and meets State and Federal reporting requirements.

Deliverables: Acquisition of temporary and permanent property rights from three (3) parcels, with files on each negotiation, acquisition, and project settlement.

TASK 5 - ESCROW COORDINATION SERVICES
BRI will deliver documents and checks to the escrow company, review all documents for submission to escrow companies, and review all final title and escrow documents. We will apply extensive acquisition experience so that the project acquires good title and property rights necessary for completion. BRI will coordinate escrow closings and file all applicable forms and documents with the County Assessor’s office.

Deliverables: Facilitate Title and Escrow support as outlined above for three (3) parcels.

TASK 6 - CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION
BRI will coordinate with Caltrans District 11 to supply all required documentation for the draft and final Right of Way Certification Document 13-B at certification level 1 or 2.

Deliverables: One (1) draft and one (1) final Right of Way Certification Document 13-B at certification level 1 or 2.

FEDERAL/CALTRANS COMPLIANCE
Under the City’s direction and operational policies, all right of way services will be provided in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as amended, and implementing regulation, 49 CFR Part 24; California Government Code Section 7267 et seq.; California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1263.010 to 1263.620 and 1255.010 to 1255.060; Housing and Community Development Title 25; USPAP, the City’s real estate policies and Caltrans real estate policies and procedures, as applicable.

DELIVERY SCHEDULE
The Memorandums of Appraisal Updates will be delivered in four (4) weeks of Notice to Proceed (NTP) and the independent appraisal reviews will be delivered within two (2) weeks thereafter.

Acquisition tasks are anticipated to take place over three (3) to six (6) months. Escrow and Right of Way Certification will be completed thereafter.

Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening
December 11, 2024

2825 Watt Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95821 | www.benderrosenthal.com | 916.978.4900

FEE FOR SERVICES
The fee for additional right of way services for the Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Project is $32,996.66. Attached please find BRI’s 10-H1 fee proposal containing the staff proposed, and their hourly rates, direct and indirect, based on Federal Audited Rates, as well as hours per task.

Should you have any questions regarding this scope and fee, please reach out to Project Manager Chip Willett at [email protected] or at (760) 716-8600.

We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,
BENDER ROSENTHAL, INC.

Renee Baur, PMP
CA Real Estate Broker
Chief Executive Officer

Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: BENDER ROSENTHAL, INC.

Project No. TBD Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Senior Project Manager Chip Willett, RE Broker 36 $ 76.92 $ 2,769.12 Project Manager Nicole Cornell, PMP 24 $ 60.00 $ 1,440.00 60 LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 4,209.12
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $168.36
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 4,377.48

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 41.12% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 1,800.02 f) Overhead (Rate: 19.83% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 868.06 h) General & Admin (Rate: 58.70% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ 2,569.58 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 5,237.66
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 961.51 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
3 Each $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
3 Each $ 3,500.00 $ 10,500.00
1 Each $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
6 Each $ 70.00 $ 420.00
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 22,420.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 22,420.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 32,996.66
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

Description of Item
Memorandums of Appraisal Updates
Acquisition Services
Right of Way Certification
Shipping
EXHIBIT 10-H COST PROPOSAL

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
December 11, 2024
Range
$68.00 - $96.00
$35.00 - $65.00
Grossmont Center Drive Bridge Widening Project
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $70.15 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 5.0% = $73.66 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 5.0% = $77.34 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 5.0% = $81.21 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 5.0% = $85.27 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 60 = 12 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 60 = 48 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 60
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 12 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 48 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $70.15 $841.82
$73.66 $3,535.66
$77.34 $0.00
$81.21 $0.00
$85.27 $0.00
$4,377.48
$4,209.12
$168.36

1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

0.0%
100.0%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

20.0%

80.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $70.15
$73.66
$77.34
$81.21
EXHIBIT 10-H COST PROPOSAL

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $4,209.12 60

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 2825 Watt Ave. Suite 200, Sacramento CA 95821
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. 12/11/2024
EXHIBIT 10-H COST PROPOSAL
Certification of Direct Costs:

Right of Way Services
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Renee Baur Chief Executive Officer
[email protected] (916) 978-4900
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

CITY OF LA MESA COST PROPOSAL Exhibit 10-H1 Page 1 of 6 Grossmont Center Drive Bridge
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Sub
Consultant NV5, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. TBD Date 14-Oct-24

DIRECT LABOR
Hours Hourly Rates Total
Principal/Project Manager* 20 $119.67 $2,393.40
Assistant Project Manager* 10 $107.48 $1,074.80
10 $125.00 $1,250.00
8 $69.10 $552.80
48 $5,271.00

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $5,271.00
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for sample) $0.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $5,271.00

FRINGE BENEFITS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 16.54% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $871.82
Classification/Title Name
Jack Abcarius
Darab Bouzarjomehri
2 nd Assistant Project Manager Mehrnoush Yavary
CAD Tech. III Steve Dodge
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
06 - JUNE - 2025 Mark Weaver ATTACHMENT "B"

INDIRECT COSTS Page 2 of 6
f) Overhead (Rate: 54.27% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $2,860.57 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 67.34% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $3,549.49 j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $7,281.89
FIXED FEE (Profit)
q) (Rate: 10.00% ) k) TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] x (q)] $1,255.29 l) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC)
Description Unit(s) Unit Cost Total
Day $0.00
LS $0.00
LS $0.00
Miles $0.00
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00
m) Subconsultants:

Subconsultant 1: BRI, Inc. $23,996.66 63.48%
Subconsultant 2: (DBE) 0.00%
Subconsultant 3: (DBE) 0.00%
Subconsultant 4: (DBE) 0.00%
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT'S COSTS $23,996.66
n) Total Other Direct Costs Including Subconsultants [(l) + (m)] $23,996.66 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $37,804.84
NOTES:
1 Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
2 The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3 Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
$32,996.66 $32,996.66 $32,996.66 $46,804.84

70.50%

CITY OF LA MESA COST PROPOSAL Exhibit 10-H1 Page 3 of 6 Grossmont Center Drive Bridge
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Sub
Consultant NV5, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. TBD Date 14-Oct-24

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor
Subtotal Avg Hourly 2 Year Contract
per Cost
Proposal Rate Duration
$5,271.00 = $109.81 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $109.81 + = $113.11 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $113.11 + = $116.50 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $116.50 + = $120.00 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $120.00 + = $123.59 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each
Year per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 48.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 48.0

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Year 1 $109.81 * = $5,271.00 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $113.11 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $116.50 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $120.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $123.59 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $5,271.00
= $5,271.00
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1 This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2 An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 3% x 5 yrs = $37,500 is not an acceptable methodology) 3 This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4 Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. 0 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
Cost per Year (calculated above)
48 0
0 0
Estimated hours

48.0 48.0

48.0 48.0
Total

48.0 Total Hours
per Cost Proposal
48 Proposed Escalation
3%
3%
3%
3%
Total Hours
per Cost Proposal
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
06 - JUNE - 2025

CITY OF LA MESA Page 4 of 6
Grossmont Center Drive Bridge
Certification of Direct Costs:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. 4.

5. 6.

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Lori Goodwin Title *:

Senior Vice
President
Signature :

Date of Certification
(mm/dd/yyyy): 10/14/2024
Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 559-661-5228
Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

1. Civil Engineering (Surveying, Roadway, Traffic, SWPPP)

2. Structural Engineering (Bridge Design & Retrofit)

3. Geotechnical Engineering

4. Environmental Permitting (if necessary)
Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration ofEngineering and Design Related Service 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable)
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.

Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
15092 Avenue of Science, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92128

CITY OF LA MESA

GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE BRIDGE

SCOPE OF WORK - ESTIMATED HOURS WORKSHEET
$313.49 $281.56 $327.46 $181.02
Staff Name Jack
Abcarius
Darab
Bouzarjomehri
Mehrno
ush
Yavary
Steve
Dodge
Staff Classification
Principal/Project Manager*Assistant Project Manager*2nd Assistant Project ManagerCAD Tech. III 20 10 10 8 48 $13,808.18 $0.00
1 0.1 Project Coordination & Meetings 4 4 4 4 16 $4,414.11

0.2 Quality Assurance & Quality Control 2 2 2 6 $1,845.02

0.3 Project Administration 14 4 4 4 26 $7,549.05
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
Project Management Services

TOTAL HOURSTOTAL FULLY LOADED LABOR COST PER TASKSUBCONSULTANT COSTS Fully Loaded Hourly Rate (Direct Labor, overhead, and profit) TASKS SubTask
No.

TOTAL HOURS FOR PROJECT
Mark Weaver

CITY OF LA MESA

GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE BRIDGE

SCOPE OF WORK - ESTIMATED HOURS WORKSHEET
$313.49 $281.56 $327.46 $181.02
Staff Name Jack
Abcarius
Darab
Bouzarjomehri
Mehrno
ush
Yavary
Steve
Dodge
Staff Classification
Principal/Project Manager*Assistant Project Manager*2nd Assistant Project ManagerCAD Tech. III 20 10 10 8 48 $13,808.18 $0.00
Project Management Services

TOTAL HOURSTOTAL FULLY LOADED LABOR COST PER TASKSUBCONSULTANT COSTS Fully Loaded Hourly Rate (Direct Labor, overhead, and profit) TASKS SubTask
No.

TOTAL HOURS FOR PROJECT
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 0 0 0 0 $0.00

5.1 Pre-Bid Meeting 0 $0.00

5.2 Bid Support - Respond to RFIs (15 max) 0 $0.00

5.3 Evaluate Bids 0 $0.00

5.4 Attend Pre-Construction Meeting 0 $0.00

5.5 Assist RE with Contract Documents 0 $0.00

5.6 Review Shop Drawing Submittals 0 $0.00

5.7 Construction Site Meetings (2 Max) 0 $0.00

5.8 Prepare As-Builts 0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
PHASE 5 - Construction Support

OPTIONAL SERVICES
Mark Weaver

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: A. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 25-17, 2025 PAVING

PROJECT, AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT TO HAZARD CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERING, INC.

B. RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO
ARDURRA GROUP, INC. TO PROVIDE INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR THE 2025 PAVING PROJECT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
SUMMARY:

Should the City Council approve the attached Resolutions:

Issues:

A. Accepting Bid 25-17, 2025 Paving Project and awarding a construction contract to Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $774,729? B. Awarding a task order to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide inspection services for the 2025 Paving Project in the amount of $54,240?
Recommendation:

A. Accept Bid 25-17, 2025 Paving Project and awarding a construction contract to Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $774,729.

B. Award a task order to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide inspection services for the 2025 Paving Project in the amount of $54,240.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 4
Fiscal Impact:

CIP No. 8304, 2025 Paving Project (Street Resurfacing Project), is funded by TransNet Regional Transportation Improvement Program, LAM40. No general fund money will be used for this project.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.  Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s annual street projects aim to provide excellent municipal services to commuters and residents by regularly and responsibly maintaining and improving roadways through means most effective to the community. The 2025 Paving Project will fully reconstruct selected streets utilizing the Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) method that recycles materials for reduced time impact to residents and decreased cost.

The City maintains roadways on a 7-year, 7-zone cycle. Roadways are selected based on multiple factors, including average daily traffic, types of vehicle load, paving history, types of roadway damage, and more. Although this year’s resurfacing zone is 5, due to roadway damage, utility repairs, and various other factors, the City has included the streets shown in Attachment F.

DISCUSSION:

Construction Contract. On June 11, 2025, a notice inviting bids was advertised, and bid documents were distributed. On June 30, 2025, the following six bids were received electronically.

Bidders Base Bid Bid Total
Hazard Construction Engr LLC $774,729.00 $774,729.00
VSI Technologies $850,000.00 $850,000.00
R.J. Noble Company $1,014,996.86 $1,014,996.86
Frank & Son Paving, Inc. $1,062,340.57 $1,062,340.57
TC Construction Company, Inc. $1,121,229.60 $1,121,229.60 LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp. $1,181,084.80 $1,181,084.80

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 4
The apparent responsive and responsible low bidder was identified as Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc., with a base bid of $774,729, which is below the engineer’s estimate for the base bid of $903,733. The contract time for project completion is 30 working days. The work is expected to begin in July 2025 and be completed by October 2025.

Inspection and Construction Management Contract. In May 2025, the City solicited proposals from pre-qualified firms for Inspection and Construction Management services for CIP No, 8304, the 2025 Paving Project. On June 10, 2025, Ardurra Group, Inc. (Ardurra) submitted a proposal and subsequently was found to be the most highly qualified firm. The contract with Adrura is $54,240, and their proposal is included as attachment D.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions:

A. Accepting Bid 25-17, 2025 Paving Project and awarding a construction contract to Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $774,729.

B. Awarding a task order to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide construction management and inspection services for the 2025 Paving Project in the amount of $54,240.

Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Respectfully submitted by:

Tristan Leger_______________________
Tristan Leger
Assistant Engineer

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 4 of 4
Attachments: A – Resolution Awarding Bid 25-17 to Hazard Construction Eng, Inc.

B – Resolution Awarding Task Order to Ardurra Group, Inc.

C – Bid 25-17 Tabulation
D – Ardurra Group, Inc. Proposal
E – Map of Work

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
ACCEPTING THE LOW BIDDER FOR BID 25-17 AND AWARDING A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 2025 PAVING PROJECT TO
HAZARD CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, INC. (CIP NO. 8304)
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa continues to improve public streets and roadways to provide smoother roads for residents and commuters;
WHEREAS, the City advertised a notice inviting bids on June 11, 2025; WHEREAS, the City received six (6) bids on the bid opening date of June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, based on the base bid, the low bidder, Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc., was found to be a responsive and responsible bidder.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:

Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc. was determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bid with a base bid in the amount of $774,729 for Bid 25-17, 2025 Paving Project, CIP Project No. 8304. Said bid is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorized to accept and execute a contract with Hazard Construction Engineering, Inc. to perform the work at the prices set forth in said base bid.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is authorized to approve the substitution of subcontractors.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on said date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE 2025 PAVING
PROJECT (CIP NO. 8304)
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa continues to provide high quality municipal services to residents and commuters;
WHEREAS, in May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications RFQ 25-01 for as-needed engineering services;
WHEREAS, Ardurra Group, Inc. was selected as a qualified firm to provide as-needed construction management and inspection services; and
WHEREAS, the City requires assistance with inspection for the 2025 Paving Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:

The task order to provide construction management and inspection services of 2025 Annual Resurfacing Project, CIP Project No. 8304, for an amount of $54,240 is approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a task order with Ardurra Group, Inc. to perform the work.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Bidders Base Bid Bid Total
1 Hazard Construction Engr LLC $774,729.00
2 VSI Technologies $850,000.00
3 R.J. Noble Company $1,014,996.86
4 Frank & Son Paving, Inc. $1,062,340.57
5 TC Construction Company, Inc. $1,121,229.60
6 LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp. $1,181,084.80
$774,729.00
$850,000.00
$1,014,996.86
$1,062,340.57
$1,121,229.60
$1,181,084.80
Engineer's Estimate $903,703.00 $903,703.00
Bid Tabulation
BID 25-17 2025 Paving Project
All bids compared on the basis of the BASE BID ONLY.

▪
▪
▪

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SECTION 4216 & 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE @ 1-800-422-4133 TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: WWW.DIGALERT.ORG Page 76 of 375

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW OF A NEW
WIRELESS FACILITY; PROJECT NO. 2024-1135 (4200

LOWELL STREET)
DESCRIPTION: CITY COUNCIL RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW

APPROVAL OF A NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 185 SQUARE FOOT 8

FOOT HIGH EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND

ASSOCIATED ANTENNAE MOUNTED ON A LIGHT
POLE AT 4200 LOWELL STREET, APN 475-050-06-00,
IN THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL (R1) ZONE.

ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council ratify the Design Review Board’s determination that the proposed project design meets the intent of the Design Guidelines for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities?
Recommendation:

That City Council ratify the Design Review Board approval of Project 2024-1135 (Attachment 1).

Fiscal Impact:

There is no impact to the General Fund related to this project. The City’s policy is to recover 100% of the cost of staff time through application processing fees.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
BACKGROUND:

The proposed wireless communication facility (wireless facility) is proposed to be located on the Helix Charter High School site,
located on Lowell Street between
University Avenue and Orien Avenue, as
seen on the Vicinity map below.

Development on Lowell Street is
primarily residential, and the school
represents a significant majority of
development on Lowell, south of
University Avenue.

The project includes the replacement of
a 78-foot-tall light pole that will house the
antennae, and a new 185 square foot, eight-foot-tall shelter to house the equipment. The subject light pole would match the surrounding baseball field light poles and no other light poles would be impacted as a result of the project.

The existing parcel is primarily landscaped with
street trees, grass, and other vegetation; however,
the proposed leased area and surrounding areas are
not currently landscaped.

Review by the City’s Design Review Board (DRB) is
required for wireless facilities per the City of La
Mesa’s 2001 Wireless Communication Facilities
Ordinance. The Design Review Board considered
and approved the proposed project on April 14, 2025
(Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

As mentioned above, the applicant proposes to
replace an existing 78-foot-high light pole to add wireless communication equipment and construct a 185 square foot 8-foot-tall concrete masonry unit (CMU) brick equipment enclosure. The DRB determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Design Guidelines for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (Attachment 2) as follows:

Location. Although co-locating wireless infrastructure on existing facilities is encouraged by the Design Guidelines for Wireless Facilities, there currently are no other cellular facilities available to co-locate with in the nearby area. The existing cell sites in the vicinity are either in the process of co-locating with another carrier or did not meet the antenna

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
elevation that the applicant required to provide sufficient coverage. Therefore, the proposed location would provide the best coverage for the applicant while maintaining the existing character of the neighborhood and minimizing the visual impact of the site (Attachment 3).

Color and Materials. To create a cohesive design, the project will utilize the same light pole design with the equipment enclosed in a cylindrical enclosure painted the same grey color as the existing pole. The ground level equipment enclosure would be constructed out of CMU brick wall with a height of eight feet, and painted brown to match the surrounding ground cover.

Scale and Form. The location of the cylinder on the pole would help conceal the equipment out of the normal sightlines of persons within the area and would not change the existing scale of the light pole. The proposed 185 square foot and 8-foot-high equipment shelter is consistent with the scale and form of other buildings on the site and therefore would not create a negative visual impact.

Landscaping. Consistent with the existing condition, no further landscaping is proposed.

To further integrate with the surrounding area, the equipment enclosure will be painted a brown color to minimize impacts to viewers from the street. Viewers from the school and baseball field would experience minimal visual impacts from the enclosure due to the netting blocking views of the street.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the Design Review Board approval of Project 2024-1135.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:

1. Design Review Board Certificate of Action

2. Design Guidelines for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities

3. Photo Simulations

CERTIFICATION OF

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
FILE: Project 2024-1135 (Lowell Street)
MEETING DATE: April 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration for a new wireless communication facility at 4200 Lowell Street, APN 475-050-06-00 in the R1 (Urban Residential) zone.

DETERMINATION: After reviewing the proposal, the Board made a motion to recommend approval of Project 2024-1135 based on plans
stamped received by the City on November 4, 2024, and a materials board stamped received on March 11, 2025, and a finding that the project is consistent with the City’s Wireless Facility Design Guidelines.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Aye: Vice Chair Ruiz-Ostmeyer, Board Member Langdon, Board Member Morita, and Director of Community Development Santos
Nay: None

Absent: None
ATTEST:

Lynnette Santos
Director of Community Development

Exhibit A
Project 2024-1135
Conditions of Approval

1. The project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project drawings received electronically by the City on November 4, 2024, consisting of fourteen (14) sheets total, including Sheet T1 – Title Sheet, Sheet LS-1 – 1A Certificate, Sheet LS-2 – Site Survey, Sheet LS-3 – Site Survey, Sheet PS-1 – Photosim, Sheet PS-2 – Photosim, Sheet PS-3 – Photosim, Sheet A1 – Overall Site Plan, Sheet A2 – Enlarged Site Plan, Sheet A3 – Proposed Antenna Plan & Schedule, Sheet A4 – Proposed Elevations, Sheet A5 – Proposed Elevations, Sheet A6 – Proposed Equipment Elevations, Sheet A7 – Enlarged Equipment Plan.

2. This approval shall not waive compliance with any section of the La Mesa Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein.

3. Prior to any use or issuance of final occupancy of the project site pursuant to this approval, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

4. The applicant is responsible for coordinating civil, landscape, and architectural plans and supplemental materials at building permit submittal to ensure that all project plans and materials are internally consistent and consistent with each other. Inconsistent construction documents will not be accepted.

5. This does not constitute an approval of the discretionary entitlement. Approval from the Planning Commission is required for discretionary entitlement. Additional permits, including but not limited to building and grading permits, may be required by the Community Development Department or other City departments prior to commencement of construction and/or use. It is the property owner and applicant’s responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed.

6. The Owner shall waive any claims of liability against the City and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City and City's employees regarding any component of the City’s approval, and shall execute an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as provided by the Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance, initiating use in reliance of this permit, and the Community Development Director is hereby authorized to execute the same.

7. The applicant shall consult with the landlord to determine a final painting design for the school logo on the equipment enclosure or utilize CMU blocks with natural color aggregates if no design is chosen. The final design shall be approved by the Director of Community Development.

A. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING SUBMITTAL:

Building

1. Plans and calculations must be complete and stamped by a licensed professional before the Building Division can accept them into the plan review and permitting process.

2. The design shall meet all requirements for current adopted California Building Codes.

Engineering

1. Public improvement plans shall be complete and stamped by a licensed professional engineer.

2. All engineering permits (encroachment, grading, et cetera) for this development project shall be submitted concurrently. An encroachment permit (major) with a traffic control plan is required for work to be performed in the street right-of-way, e.g., utility installation; new curb and gutter, sidewalk and driveway approach; lighting; tree planting; parking of construction equipment; storage of materials; etcetera. Use of an appropriate regional standard traffic control plan is suggested.

3. The project shall comply with the applicable adopted City of La Mesa engineering standards and policies and San Diego County Regional Standard Drawings. All public and private improvements in the city right-of-way shall comply with City of La Mesa engineering standards.

4. The project shall comply with the City’s stormwater quality and erosion control requirements.

B. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING AND GRADING PERMITS:

Engineering

1. All engineering bonds shall be secured and fees paid prior to issuance of engineering permits.

C. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF FINAL OCCUPANCY:

Building

1. The applicant shall obtain approvals from all departments for all issued permits: building, fire, planning, engineering, or other permits for the proposed improvements prior to final.

Engineering

1. The applicant shall obtain final inspections and approvals from all departments for all issued permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Agreement of acceptance
I accept all the requirements for the project indicated above. I am aware that permits might not be granted if the requirements are not fulfilled. I, the applicant, or my lawfully authorized agent, acknowledge and agree to all the above-mentioned requirements imposed by the City of La Mesa. _______________________________ _________________
Business owner/ owner’s Agent Date
_______________________________ _________________
Applicant’s name and title Date

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF
PHASE 1 OF THE GROSSMONT SHOPPING CENTER
RENOVATION PROJECT 2025-0903
DESCRIPTION: RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR PHASE 1 OF THE GROSSMONT SHOPPING CENTER
PROJECT; 5500 GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE, (APNS
490-261-09-00 AND 490-261-10-00) IN THE C-G-D
(GENERAL COMMMERCIAL / GROSSMONT OVERLAY
/ URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Does the proposed design meet the intent of the Urban Design Program policies and the Grossmont Specific Plan?
Recommendation:

Ratify the Design Review Board approval of Project 2025-0903 (Attachment A).

Fiscal Impact:

There is no impact to the General Fund related to this project. The City’s policy is to recover 100% of the cost of staff time through application processing fees.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 7
BACKGROUND:

The proposed project includes the renovation of several tenant spaces and an exterior refresh of the portion of the Grossmont Shopping Center (Grossmont Center) that is located along the northern portion of the existing site. The overall site is approximately 64-acre property that is comprised of two lots located at 5500 Grossmont Center Drive, bounded by Center Drive to the west, Murray Drive to the east, and Jackson Drive to the south, as shown on the vicinity map below. The lot is roughly rectangular in shape. Photos of the project site are provided as Attachment B.

No right-of-way improvements are proposed for this phase of renovations. Various renovations that have occurred over the years have resulted in a disjointed and dated design aesthetic. To create a more uniform design theme and to ensure the success of all tenants, the entire shopping center will be renovated, proposed to be completed in three phases.
 Phase 1, the subject of this project, addresses the northern storefronts of the Grossmont Center that are between the two primary anchors at the west and east end of the mall, currently occupied by Target and Walmart, respectively. Target and Walmart are not included in the renovation project.  Phase 2 is proposed to focus on renovation of the anchor tenant building on the southwest side, currently occupied by Macy’s.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 7
 Phase 3 is proposed to include renovation of the buildings and facades along the south and southeast portions of the Center, between the current Macy’s and Walmart.

Target and Walmart are not included in the proposed phases of the renovation project.

Signage will be processed under comprehensive sign program, once tenant details and agreements are finalized. The comprehensive sign program would be reviewed and subject to approval by Planning Commission.

Projects that involve major renovations or remodeling of property within the Urban Design Overlay zone shall be subject to the Urban Design Program. The City’s Urban Design Program and Grossmont Specific Plan prescribe urban design principles to projects that are located within the subject overlay zones. Project entitlement consists of Design Review by the Design Review Board (DRB), subject to City Council ratification. The DRB considered and approved the proposed project on June 23, 2025.

DISCUSSION:

The Urban Design Program identifies Grossmont Center as a major commercial node, which are complexes of buildings and other site development elements having a uniform or related design theme. Similarly, the Grossmont Specific Plan specifies the importance of applying superior design principles to the Grossmont Shopping Center, as well as incorporating landmarks into its design. The DRB determined that the proposed project meets the intent of the Urban Design Program and Grossmont Specific Plan through the site design and architectural design as discussed below.

URBAN DEISGN PROGRAM SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Site Design
The proposed renovations will improve upon the existing shopping center under these considerations:
 The project will establish a unified design theme that is simple, crisp, and modern, allowing each tenant's identity to shine through. Design consistency will be upheld with an overall color and material palette, which consists of neutral hues, a warm wood tone, and a cool, fresh accent color that will be used in discrete doses.  The storefronts will be renovated to meet the requirements of the Urban Design Program by increasing the storefront continuity and improving the appropriate proportion to the pedestrian scale. Additionally, new architectural details, such as wood paneling, stone bases, and pops of blue accent walls, will make the overall building scale to a much more pedestrian-friendly scale.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 4 of 7
 The renovated central plaza and entry paseos strategically integrate sitting areas, pedestrian-focused design, and accessible open space to create a vibrant community hub that aligns with the Urban Design Program. The central pedestrian mall and entry paseos will feature enhanced outdoor seating oriented toward primary circulation paths to activate the space and create natural rest points. The design incorporates pedestrian-appropriate amenities including distinctive planting, a central fountain, decorative paving elements, and shade canopies that provide human-scaled visual interest and comfort. The central plaza will serve as an accessible community gathering node connecting all mall buildings through the integrated pedestrian system, featuring a stage for events, interpretive play elements, and flexible gathering areas.  The project’s exterior lighting design uses wall sconces, path lights, tree lights, and string lighting to illuminate entrances, walkways, and seating areas while enhancing the architectural and landscape design.

Landscape Design
The proposed landscaping includes a combination of accent and broad-spreading shade trees, accent plants and shrubs, and turf areas. The plants proposed are lowmaintenance, low-water, and native to Southern California. The combination of trees, accent plants, and shrubs provide visual focal points and shade from the sun.

For Phase 1, a total of 30 trees are proposed, including six street trees along the entrance from Grossmont Center Drive, and 24 on-site trees.

Off-Street Parking Design
While there are no significant modifications to the existing parking areas, there are proposed changes limited to the loading zone and striping in front of Buildings 9 and 12.

These improvements include widening the sidewalk at the northwest corner of Building 9 and replacing the paving and updating the ADA striping at the secondary pedestrian entrance between Buildings 9 and 12. The existing parking facilities include interior and perimeter landscaping around the paved areas with curbing, striping and wheel stops that all comply with the City’s Parking and Landscape Standards and Off-Street Parking Design Guidelines.

Energy Conservation
The project will meet all energy conservation requirements and the Energy Conservation Guidelines through its site orientation, open spaces, and landscaping. The orientation and siting of structures and landscaping considers water conservation, by management of water run-off and use of plant materials appropriate to the climate.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 5 of 7
Safety Design
Security bollards with lighting along the northern facades provide a clear separation from the vehicular and pedestrian circulation, while new exterior-facing storefronts increase natural surveillance. The project meets the intent of the safety design guidelines by creating a clear distinction of semi-public space on the property and incorporation of strategic light placement.

URBAN DESIGN PROGRAM ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES
Architectural Design
The project addresses the Urban Design Program’s architectural elements for architectural design including design theme, consistency, form and texture, human scale, pedestrian interest, and entries. The modern design theme features simple, crisp lines with varied surface planes, forms, and textures that create visual interest across building elevations while maintaining consistency. Facades renovations break up blank walls, through horizontal and vertical dimensional additions, creating varied window sizes organized in consistent patterns that contribute to the human scale and appropriate building massing. Buildings 9 and 13 will undergo major façade renovations, while Building 12 will receive minor improvements pending future tenant decisions.

BEFORE
AFTER

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 6 of 7
Architectural Finish and Details
The building design utilizes varied colors and materials for visual interest, featuring plaster surfaces with metal canopies and siding, composite wood panels, and stone base accents. Colors include white, dark grey, blue, brown, and copper, creating a neutral theme that complements current and future Grossmont Shopping Center tenants. The color scheme and materials align with Urban Design Program Guidelines by providing visual contrast while remaining compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.

GROSSMONT SPECIFIC PLAN SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES The Grossmont Specific Plan identifies the importance of creating landmarks for the Grossmont Shopping Center that are highly visible from the community and located at major entrances through landmark buildings, signage, and distinctive landscaping. The primary entrance from Grossmont Center Drive will have enhanced landscaping leading to a renovated gateway featuring a new entry portico that reflects the modern design, enhancing the visual presence of Grossmont Shopping Center from the public right-ofway.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council ratify the Design Review Board’s approval of Project 2025-0903.

BEFORE AFTER

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 7 of 7
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:

A. Design Review Board Certification of Action for Project 2025-0903 B. Site Photographs (Existing Photos and Proposed Renderings)

CERTIFICATION OF

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
FILE: Project 2025-0903 (5500 Grossmont Center)
MEETING DATE: June 23, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration for the first phase of renovations of Grossmont Shopping Center (Phase 1) at 5500 Grossmont Center Drive, APNs 490-261-09-00 and 490-261-10-00 in the C-G-D (General Commercial/Grossmont Overlay/Urban Design Overlay) zone.

DETERMINATION: After reviewing the proposal, the Board made a motion to recommend approval of Project 2025-0903 based on plans
stamped received by the City on June 13, 2025, and a materials board stamped received on March 21, 2025, and a finding that the project is consistent with the City’s Urban Design Program and Grossmont Specific Plan Guidelines.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Aye: Board Member Langdon, Board Member Morita, Director of Community Development Santos, and Assistant Director of Community Development Chavez
Nay: None

Absent: Chair Ruiz-Ostmeyer, and Board Member Morita
ATTEST:

Lynnette Santos
Director of Community Development

Exhibit A
Project 2025-0903
Conditions of Approval

1. The project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project drawings received electronically by the City on June 13, 2025, consisting of sixty-fix (65) sheets total, including Sheet 1 – Cover Page, Sheet 2 – Sheet Index, Sheet 3 – Principles, Sheet 4 – Vision, Sheet 5 – Overall Site Plan – Scope, Sheet 6 Overall Site Plan – ADA Stalls and Path of Travel, Sheet 7 – Accessible Parking Layout, Sheet 8 – Overall Landscape Site Plan, Sheet 9 – Color and Material Palette, Sheet 10 – Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 1 – Existing, Sheet 11 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 1 – Proposed, Sheet 12 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 2 – Existing, Sheet 13 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 2 – Proposed, Sheet 14 – Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 3 – Existing, Sheet 15 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: View 3 – Proposed, Sheet 16 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 17 - Bldg. 9 North Facade:

Elevations (BW), Sheet 18 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 19 - Bldg. 9 North Facade: Landscape, Sheet 20 - Bldg. 12 North Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 21 - Bldg. 12 North Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 22 - Bldg. 12 North Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 23 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: View 4 – Existing, Sheet 24 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: View 4 – Proposed, Sheet 25 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: View 5 – Existing, Sheet 26 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: View 5 – Proposed, Sheet 27 - Bldg. 13 North Gateway: Existing And Proposed, Sheet 28 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 29 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 30 - Bldg. 13 North Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 31 - Bldg. 13 East Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 32 - Bldg. 13 East Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 33 - Bldg. 13 East Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 34 - Bldg. 13 North Facade:

Landscape Plan, Sheet 35 - Entry Drive: Landscape Plan, Sheet 36 - Bldg. 9 & 12 East And West Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 37A - Bldg. 9 & 12 East And West Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 37B - Bldg. 9 & 12 East And West Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 38 - Bldg. 9 & 12 East And West Facade: Landscape Plan, Sheet 39 - Bldg. 12 & 13 Main Paseo:

Existing, Sheet 40 - Bldg. 12 & 13 Main Paseo: Proposed, Sheet 41 - Bldg. 12 & 13 Main Paseo: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 42 - Bldg. 12 East Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 43 - Bldg. 12 East Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 44 - Bldg. 13 West Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 45 - Bldg. 13 West Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 46 - Bldg. 12 & 13 Main Paseo:

Landscape Plan, Sheet 47 - Bldg. 9 South Facade: Existing, Sheet 48 - Bldg. 9 South Facade: Proposed, Sheet 49 - Bldg. 9 South Facade: Enlarged Plan, Sheet 50 - Bldg. 9 South Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 51 - Bldg. 9 South Facade: Elevations (Color), Sheet 52 - Bldg. G North Facade: Elevations (BW), Sheet 53 - Central Plaza: Landscape Plan, Sheet 54 - Central Plaza: Landscape Plan, Sheet 55 - Central Plaza: Landscape Images, Sheet 56 - Lighting Schedule 1, Sheet 57 - Lighting Schedule 2, Sheet 58 - Lighting Plan:

Overall, Sheet 59 - Lighting Plan: Central Plaza, Sheet 60 - Lighting Plan: Theater Paseo, Sheet 61 - Lighting Plan: Main Paseo, Sheet 62 - Civil Drawings - Grading Plan, and Sheet 63 - Civil Drawings - Storm Water.

2. This approval shall not waive compliance with any section of the La Mesa Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein.

3. Prior to any use or issuance of final occupancy of the project site pursuant to this approval, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

4. The applicant is responsible for coordinating civil, landscape, and architectural plans and supplemental materials at building permit submittal to ensure that all project plans and materials are internally consistent and consistent with each other. Inconsistent construction documents will not be accepted.

5. Additional permits, including but not limited to building and grading permits, may be required by the Community Development Department or other City departments prior to commencement of construction and/or use. It is the property owner and applicant’s responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed.

6. The Owner shall waive any claims of liability against the City and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City and City's employees regarding any component of the City’s approval, and shall execute an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as provided by the Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance, initiating use in reliance of this permit, and the Community Development Director is hereby authorized to execute the same.

Agreement of acceptance
I accept all the requirements for the project indicated above. I am aware that permits might not be granted if the requirements are not fulfilled. I, the applicant, or my lawfully authorized agent, acknowledge and agree to all the above-mentioned requirements imposed by the City of La Mesa. _______________________________ _________________
Business owner/ owner’s Agent Date
_______________________________ _________________
Applicant’s name and title Date

ATTACHMENT B EXISTING

EXISTING

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

EXISTING

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

EXISTING PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

EXISTING

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B

PROPOSED

EXISTING

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF A
PROPOSED REDESIGN OF 6957 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE (PROJECT 2025-0498).

DESCRIPTION: CITY COUNCIL RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL OF A REDESIGN OF A PROPOSED TWOSTORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 6957

UNIVERSITY AVENUE IN THE GENERAL

COMMERCIAL (URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY / MIXED
USE OVERLAY) ZONE (PROJECT 2025-0498).

ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

1. Should the City Council ratify the June 25, 2025, approval of the Design Review Board, approving the exterior redesign of a proposed two-story commercial building?
Recommendation:

1. That City Council ratify Design Review Board’s approval of Project 2025- 0498 (Attachment A).

Fiscal Impact:

There would be no impact to the General Fund related to this project. City of La Mesa policy is to recover 100% of the cost of staff time through application processing fees

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
City’s Strategic Goal(s):
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

The proposed project is on a 5,382 square foot lot located at 6957 University Avenue, at the southwest corner of University Avenue and Lois Street. Construction is currently underway on a two-story 2,377 square foot commercial building (Cannabis Dispensary) This project was approved by the Design Review Board (DRB) on October 28, 2019.

DISCUSSION:

The applicant requested review and approval of design modifications to the project approved by DRB on October 28, 2019 (Attachment B). The scope of the design changes are outlined below and shown on Attachment C).

Scope of Design Changes

1. North and South Elevations
 Revisions to the Window and Wall Geometry
 Removal of Decorative Fins

2. West Elevation
 Material and Articulation Treatment
 Articulation through a pattern of geometric stucco with squared forms Architectural Design
The current project redesign proposes to remove the wood grain anodized aluminum facade, decorative metal fins, and multi-colored articulated concrete masonry block. The new design is less decorative, and proposes a color and materials palette of white, black, and grey stucco, and a dark bronze anodized aluminum for the trim of the doors and windows. In response to DRB input, the applicant is working with City staff to revise the west elevation to meet the Urban Design Program, which states that colors should be compatible and blend with the existing colors of the surrounding neighborhood and community and should not detract or compete for attention. Earthtones (lighter greys and browns) and white are recommended for base colors of buildings with black used for an accent color.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:

At the June 25, 2025, DRB meeting, the DRB determined that, with some minor improvements to the west elevation, the proposed project redesign meets the Urban Design Program and the Mixed-Use Design Guidelines. The DRB voted unanimously to approve the project redesign and recommended that the City Council ratify the DRB’s approval. Therefore, staff recommends that City Council approve the resolution, ratifying Project 2025-0498.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:

A. June 25, 2025, DRB Certificate of Action for 6957 University Avenue Redesign B. Original Project Design Approved by DRB October 28, 2019 C. Redesign Proposal Approved by DRB June 25, 2025

CERTIFICATION OF

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
FILE: Project 2025-0498 (6957 University Avenue; Redesign) MEETING DATE: June 25,2025
SUBJECT: Design Review approval of a redesign of a proposed two-story commercial building located at 6957 University Avenue, originally approved by the Design Review Board on October 28, 2019.

DETERMINATION: After reviewing the redesign proposal, the Board made a motion to recommend approval of Project 2025-0498 finding that the project is consistent with the City’s Urban Design Program and Mixed Use Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant shall revise the west elevation as follows:
a. The use of grey (shown the color palette as SherwinWilliams Online) b. The use of relief of color and depth (stucco plant-ons) of a darker color (shown as Sherwin- Williams
Cyberspace) to reduce the large expanse of wall(s).

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Aye: Board members Langdon, Morita, and Ruiz-Ostmeyer, Santos, and Chavez
Nay: None

Absent: None
ATTEST:

Lynnette Santos
Director of Community Development

Attachment B
6957 University Avenue – Original Design (Approved by DRB October 28, 2019) North Facade
South Facade

Attachment C
6957 University Avenue – Proposed Redesign (Approved by DRB June 25, 2025)

DATE: July 8, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
Amanda Lee, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF TITLE 24 OF THE LA MESA

MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED
9365 CARMICHAEL DRIVE (APN 495-335-05-00) SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL/SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY R1S-P)
At the June 24, 2025 City Council meeting, the City Council voted 4-0, with Mayor Arapostathis absent, to approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance amending the Zoning Map of Title 24 of the La Mesa Municipal Code to designate the property addressed 9365 Carmichael Drive (APN 495-335-05-00) Suburban Residential/Scenic Preservation Overlay (R1s-P).

Staff recommends the City Council approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

Attachment: A. Draft Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF TITLE 24 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED 9365 CARMICHAEL DRIVE (APN 495-335-05-00) SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL/SCENIC
PRESERVATION OVERLAY (R1S-P)
WHEREAS, on April 27, 2022, Project Applicant, AJX Homes LLC, submitted an application for an annexation, General Plan Amendment, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (“Project 2022-0492”) for the property addressed 9365 Carmichael Drive (APN 495-335-05-00) (“Property”);
WHEREAS, the Property is currently located within the unincorporated area of San Diego County, surrounded on two sides by parcels located in the City of La Mesa; WHEREAS, the Property owner has requested jurisdictional boundary change through annexation to connect to the City’s sewer system due to a failing septic system; WHEREAS, upon annexation, the Property would detach from the County of San Diego and the San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District and would be incorporated into the City of La Mesa jurisdictional boundary;
WHEREAS, the City Sphere of Influence is coterminous with the City boundary; WHEREAS, upon annexation, the City’s Sphere of Influence would expand to include only the subject property, consistent with the jurisdictional boundary change; WHEREAS, a Zoning Ordinance Amendment is required to amend the Zoning Map, made a part of the Municipal Code by Ordinance 2479, to reflect City zoning; WHEREAS, properties surrounding the Property to the east, west, and south located within the City are zoned Suburban Residential/Scenic Preservation Overlay (R1S-P); WHEREAS, the R1S-P zone is typically assigned to areas affected by moderate to severe hillside conditions and to the fringe of such areas; WHEREAS, the Property is consistent with the City zoning designation of the surrounding neighborhood (R1S-P) which would conform to a General Plan Land Use designation of Suburban Residential;
WHEREAS, the project was reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and was determined to be exempt from environmental review; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive and consider a staff report for the Project;
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing and accepted public testimony in consideration of Project No. 2022-0492;

WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC-2025- 09 recommending that Council approve the proposed ordinance amending the Zoning Map of Title 24 of the La Mesa Municipal Code, to designate the Property Suburban Residential/Scenic Preservation Overlay (R1S-P); and
WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on June 24th, 2025, and accepted public testimony in considering Project No. 2022-0492.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That the Zone Map of Title 24 of the La Mesa Municipal Code be amended, designating the Property to R1S-P (Suburban Residential/Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone, subject to the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 2185.

SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published at least once in the Daily Transcript within 15 days of its adoption.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held on the 24th day of June 2025, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to
wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Ordinance No. 2025-xx, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT
BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING SB1205

REPORTING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ANNUAL

INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Fire
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City receive the annual SB1205 reporting?
Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution acknowledging receipt of the report made by the Fire Chief regarding compliance with the annual inspection of certain identified Occupancies pursuant to sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety Code.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the recommendation.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 2
BACKGROUND:

Senate Bill (SB) 1205 mandates that fire departments annually report to the City Council on their compliance with state-required inspections of specific occupancies. In accordance with this requirement, the Fire Chief has prepared the annual compliance report.

DISCUSSION:

SB 1205 was approved on September 27, 2018. Health and Safety Code Section (H&S Code Section) 13146.4 requires all fire departments that provide fire protection services to report annually to their administering authority on their compliance with H&S Code Section 13146.2 and 13146.3. Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 require annual inspections of every building used as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging house, apartment house and certain residential care facilities for compliance with building standards. In accordance with California H&S Code Sections 13146.2, 13146.3, and 13146.4, 86% of the identified occupancies have been inspected during the preceding 12-month period.

The remaining inspections are being scheduled and were delayed due to staffing limitations
The La Mesa Fire Department is required to provide its report, and, in turn, the City Council is required to acknowledge receipt of the Fire Department’s report and its compliance with California H&S Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive the annual reporting in compliance with H&S Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3, requiring inspections annually of every building as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging hours, apartment house and certain residential care facilities for compliance with building standards.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Bent Koch
City Manager Fire Chief
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING SB1205 REPORTING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ANNUAL

INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 was added in 2018 and became effective on January 1, 2019;
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 requires all fire departments, including La Mesa Fire Department, that provide fire protection services, to report annually to its administering authority on its compliance with Health & Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3;
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments, including La Mesa Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to perform annual inspections in every building used as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging house, apartment house, and certain residential care facilities for compliance with building standards;
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Fire Department has conducted 86% of the inspections for the identified occupancy’s pursuant to the California Health & Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 have been inspected during the period covering July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa intends this Resolution to fulfill the requirements of the California Health & Safety Code 13146.4 regarding acknowledgment of La Mesa Fire Department’s compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, are the findings of the City Council, and are incorporated herein.

2. The City Council hereby expressly acknowledges the measure of compliance of La Mesa Fire Department with Health and Safety Code sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 in the City of La Mesa for the time period of July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

3. The City Council hereby approves the adoption of the annual reporting under Health and Safety Code sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE

TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT FOR THE

OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $175,000
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: POLICE
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council authorize the Chief of Police to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement between the Police Department and the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department for the Operation Stonegarden Grant in the Amount of $175,000? Recommendation:

Approve a resolution authorizing the Chief of Police to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement between the Police Department and the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department for the Operation Stonegarden Grant in the Amount of $175,000? Fiscal Impact:

The grant is cost reimbursement, requiring the City to pay costs upfront and receiving a reimbursement for allowable costs associated with the grant activities up to $175,000.

City’s Strategic Goals:

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

In 2005, United States Department of Homeland Security established Operation Stonegarden to enhance cooperation and coordination among federal, state, tribal, and local law enforcement in an effort to reduce border-related state crimes. The Stonegarden grant is focused on addressing crime and is not related to immigration enforcement, as stated in the Memorandum of Agreement (Section 4.2).

The La Mesa Police Department will conduct all Stonegarden operations in compliance with the California Values Act (SB 54) and applicable department policies. This is a competitive grant sponsored by the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), awarding over eight million dollars toward combating border-related violence within California.

DISCUSSION:

The City of La Mesa has been authorized to receive Stonegarden Operations grant funding of $175,000. The operational funding consists of up to $157,600 in operational overtime, $12,056 for fringe benefits, and $5,344 for mileage costs.

La Mesa has three major freeways running through it and five trolley stations that can directly link individuals to the US/Mexico border. These transportation corridors have the potential to bring border-related crime (e.g. drug smuggling, trafficking) into the surrounding areas, including La Mesa.

This grant would allow officers, detectives, dispatchers, and sergeants from the Police Department to work with other police personnel throughout the County on reimbursable overtime to address border-related criminal activity, which affects La Mesa and the entire county. The majority of the operations funded for La Mesa Police personnel will take place within and/or surrounding areas of the City of La Mesa. Most other San Diego County police agencies also participate with the San Diego Sherrif’s Department (Sheriff’s Department) on this grant. Staffing Operation Stonegarden will be on an overtime basis only and will not affect the normal daily operations within the Police Department.

This grant process involves each local agency submitting their overtime requests to the Sheriff’s Department. The Sheriff’s Department will forward the San Diego County request to the State Administrative Agency (SAA), who will then submit the reimbursement request to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: July 8, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
On grant funded overtime, La Mesa Police personnel would typically work with the Sheriff’s Department and other allied local, state, and federal agency personnel conducting activities similar to:
 High visibility enforcement and traffic stop activity in high-intensity drug trafficking areas within the region
 Offer ground support for aerial flights during the day and night  High visibility criminal interdiction and/or covert interdiction operations  Specific operations targeting urban and rural areas of San Diego County All overtime will be reimbursed up to $157,600, including an additional $12,056 for personnel fringe benefits.

No additional equipment is scheduled for purchase under this grant during this cycle.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Police Department’s participation and entry into an MOA with the San Diego Sheriff’s Department for the Operation Stonegarden Grant, which will reimburse expenses related to addressing regional crime with a border nexus.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ _____________________
Greg Humora Ray Sweeney
City Manager Chief of Police
____________________
Amanda Lee
Assistant City Manager
Exhibits: A. FY 2024 OPSG Budget Worksheet
B. FY 2024 OPSG Standard Assurances
C. FY 2024 OPSG Required Federal Grant Provisions
D. FY 2024 OPSG Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form
E. FY 2024 OPSG Operations Order
Attachments: A OPSG Resolution 2024-25
B. FY 2024 OPSG Memorandum of Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM

OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT FOR THE OPERATION
STONEGARDEN GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $175,000
________________________________________________________________ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, that the City Council authorizes the Chief of Police to sign and enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department and the La Mesa Police Department for the reimbursement of overtime and equipment expenditures incurred while increasing law enforcement presence in the County of San Diego to reduce crime with a border nexus by enforcing state and local laws.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City, if awarded the grant, appropriates the funds in the amount of $175,000 for Operation Stonegarden; provided however, that if the actual revenue received from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to equal the amount actually received.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 8
th day of July 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

1 AGREEMENT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024

OPERATION STONEGARDEN (OPSG)

1. PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (COUNTY), the CITY OF

CARLSBAD, CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CITY OF EL CAJON, CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CITY OF LA MESA, CITY OF OCEANSIDE (collectively the CITIES), SAN DIEGO

UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (SDUPD), SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION (SBKN), UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO (UCSD), COUNTY OF ORANGE (OC), COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (SLOC), COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA (SBC),

COUNTY OF VENTURA (VC), COUNTY OF MONTEREY (MC), COUNTY OF SAN

MATEO (SMC), CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (CHP), CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (DFW), and the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (DPR), each a PARTY and collectively the PARTIES, for support of the Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) program.

1.1 Party Departments or Agencies Participating In The Agreement

1.1.1 For the COUNTY, participating agency is the Sheriff's Office (SHERIFF).

1.1.2 For the CITIES, SDUPD, SBKN, and UCSD, participating agencies are their respective police departments.

1.1.3 For OC, SLOC, SBC, VC, MC, and SMC participating agencies are their respective Sheriff's Departments.

1.1.4 CHP, DFW, and DPR do not have subordinate agencies or department participants.

2. RECITALS

2.1 WHEREAS, COUNTY through SHERIFF applied for, and was awarded grant funds from the U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) passed through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) grant program. As an applicant for the San Diego Border Patrol Sector, SHERIFF shall be the lead agency to manage the OPSG program.

2.2 WHEREAS, funds shall be used to support the OPSG program to enhance law enforcement preparedness and operational readiness along the land and water borders of the United States.

2.3 WHEREAS, Government Code § 55632 authorizes COUNTY and PARTIES to contract for provision of joint law enforcement services.

2 2.4 WHEREAS, PARTIES desire to enter into an agreement with provisions concerning the nature and extent of OPSG collaboration, services rendered, and compensation.

2.5 WHEREAS, COUNTY, by action of the Board of Supervisors Minute Order No. 06 on June 24, 2025, approved the appropriation and use of FY 2024 OPSG funds to reimburse PARTIES for program related overtime and fringe benefits; equipment purchases and maintenance costs; fuel; mileage; flight; and management and administration costs incurred not to exceed the amounts described in Exhibit A – FY 2024 OPSG Budget Worksheet in paragraph 2.9 (a), during the period of performance (POP) September 1, 2024 through May 31, 2027 but, the operational project period for PARTIES shall be the date of FEMA's approval, April 10, 2025 through February 28, 2027.

2.6 WHEREAS, PARTIES shall retain documentation supporting all expenditures reimbursed from OPSG grant funds, ensure all expenditures are allowable under grant requirements, adhere to the federal procurement standards found in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart D, Section § 200.317-§ 200.327, and comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements regarding organization-wide financial and compliance audit reports if $750,000 or more of OPSG federal funds are expended in a fiscal year.

2.6.1 Documentation shall be retained in accordance with the FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual and other OPSG grant requirements and shall be available for audit and inspection.

2.7 WHEREAS, PARTIES agree that this Agreement does not provide Federal authority to PARTIES to enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC).

2.8 WHEREAS, PARTIES acknowledge the following information for the OPSG grant program:
(a) Federal Grantor Agency: U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (b) Administrative Authority: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (c) Operational Oversight: U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (d) State Administrative Agency (SAA) or Pass-Through Agency: California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES)
(e) Program Title: Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)
(f) Grant Identification Number: 2024-0088
(g) Federal CFDA Number: 97.067

2.9 WHEREAS, PARTIES agree and shall utilize and adhere to the Exhibits attached hereto and/or available using the referenced links:

3 (a) Exhibit A – FY 2024 OPSG Budget Worksheet
(b) Exhibit B – FY 2024 OPSG Standard Assurances
(c) Exhibit C – FY 2024 OPSG - Required Federal Grant Provisions (d) Exhibit D - FY 2024 OPSG – Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form (e) Exhibit E – FY 2024 OPSG Operations Order
(f) Exhibit F – Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (g) Exhibit G – Appendix II Part 200
(includes guidelines/directions to create/develop mandatory and/or recommended language to cover and address each required provision for incorporation within a contract)
(h) Exhibit H - FY 2024 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
(i) Exhibit I - FY 2024 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) California Supplement to the Federal Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) (j) Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual (PGM)
Nothing in the Exhibits above shall limit the requirements of this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, PARTIES jointly intend that COUNTY will reimburse, and PARTIES will provide, a level of OPSG services as set forth in this Agreement.

3. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of this Agreement is to satisfy the OPSG grant program proposal awarded by the DHS and passed through to Cal OES, under the FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden grant program.

4. SCOPE OF SERVICES

4.1 Method of Service Delivery
SHERIFF shall manage the OPSG grant program, oversee the funding allocation of PARTIES, and be administratively responsible for coordination of PARTIES' obligations under this Agreement. SHERIFF's OPSG grant program team will be staffed as described in paragraph 6. STANDARDS OF SERVICE: OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES.

4.2 Overview of Basic Services
PARTIES shall perform OPSG Operations ("Operations") by increasing law enforcement presence in each PARTY's designated jurisdiction and in coordination with other OPSG participating agencies to support the U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) efforts to improve border security in the region. PARTIES shall enforce local and state laws within their designated jurisdiction subject to the California Values Act (SB 54; Chapter 495) and shall not enforce or aid in the enforcement of immigration laws on behalf of U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U. S. Border Patrol (BP). This Agreement does not provide Federal authority to PARTIES to enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC).

4 5. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The OPSG grant program Period of Performance (POP) is September 1, 2024 through May 31, 2027, but the operational project period for PARTIES shall be the date of FEMA's approval, April 10, 2025 through February 28, 2027.

5.1 Initial Term
The term of this Agreement shall be retroactive to 12:01 a.m. on April 10, 2025 and shall continue in effect through and terminate at midnight on May 31, 2027; subject to the termination provision in paragraph 5.3.

5.2 Option to Extend
Renewal or extension of the Agreement beyond May 31, 2027 shall be subject to remaining grant funds and to a time extension approved by Cal OES. PARTIES that choose not to renew shall terminate its participation at the end of the term of this Agreement.

5.3 Termination
Subject to the applicable provisions of state law, each PARTY may terminate its participation in this Agreement upon ninety (90) days minimum written notice to the other PARTIES.

5.3.1 A PARTY may terminate its participation in this Agreement immediately upon written notice to the other PARTIES in the event it becomes ineligible to receive grant funds under this Agreement.

5.3.2 As the lead agency, SHERIFF, with approval from FEMA, CBP, and/or Cal OES as needed, may require the termination of a PARTY's participation if it is determined that the PARTY has violated the provisions of this Agreement, including failure to provide the Anticipated Outcome set forth in section 6.3.

6. STANDARDS OF SERVICE: OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES

6.1 Suspension and Debarment
SHERIFF will request, and PARTIES shall provide a copy of the SAM.gov report for their agency which shows their Active and Inactive Exclusions. Any PARTY with Active Exclusions at the onset of, or any time during, the term of this Agreement is not eligible to participate as set forth in Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR 200.214, and codified in 2 CFR Part 180, and shall terminate its participation in this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 5.3 Termination.

6.2 Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment
PARTIES that receive an award greater than $100,000 shall certify to SHERIFF on the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form attached hereto as Exhibit D, that it will not and has not used federally appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each

5 PARTY shall also disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from agency to agency up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certifications to the federal awarding agency.

6.3 Anticipated Outcome
The anticipated outcome of Operations to be performed by PARTIES under this Agreement is increased law enforcement presence in each PARTY's designated jurisdiction to support U. S. DHS and U. S. CBP efforts in the region to improve border security and reduce border related crime. The anticipated outcome will be reached by achieving the goals and accomplishing the missions set forth below by PARTIES and in Exhibit E – FY 2024 OPSG Operations Order.

6.3.1 PARTIES shall provide enhanced enforcement by increasing patrol presence in proximity to the border and/or routes of ingress from the border, including the water borders. In addition, PARTIES shall utilize their unique investigatory areas of expertise in operations.

6.3.2 Increased intelligence/information sharing among PARTIES, including but not limited to:
(a) Conducting bi-monthly meetings with a minimum of one representative from each PARTY.
(b) Increasing information sharing during operations.

6.3.3 Prior to Operations, PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator, in paragraph 6.4.3, shall submit an operational plan and schedule to the Integrated Planning Team (IPT) at least 72 hours prior to the operation.

6.3.3.1 The IPT is comprised of SHERIFF and CBP sworn personnel.

6.3.3.2 The role of the IPT is to provide support and guidance to the local, state, and federal law enforcement stakeholders within the grant.

6.3.4 Within 48 hours following the conclusion of each Operation:

6.3.4.1 Each PARTY shall complete a Daily Activity Report (DAR) form in Excel format, which will be submitted as supporting documentation for any reimbursement request. Information entered in the Narrative section of the DAR form shall include statistical data and reports from Field Interviews (FIs), Arrest Reports, and/or Citations.

6.3.4.2 PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator in paragraph 6.4.3, or designee, shall enter and submit the same DAR information directly into DHS's Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN).

6 6.3.4.3 PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator or designee shall ensure DAR information entered in HSIN is correct and shall make necessary corrections until it is processed for approval.

6.4 Personnel Qualifications and Assignment

6.4.1 Qualifications
Each PARTY shall ensure that personnel assigned to perform Operations pursuant to this Agreement meet the minimum qualifications for their specific classification.

6.4.1.1 Personnel assigned to perform law enforcement activities in support of OPSG initiative to enhance border security must be peace officers who are certified to act as public safety officers, including but not limited to rangers, lifeguards, detectives, and investigators who work in a patrol capacity, along with assistance from other law enforcement direct support personnel such as communication officers/dispatchers and patrol pilots.

6.4.2 Management, Direction, and Supervision; Independent Contractors The hiring, firing, management, direction, and supervision of each PARTY's personnel, the standards of performance, the discipline of each PARTY's personnel, and all other matters incident to the performance of such services, shall be performed by and be the responsibility of each PARTY in each PARTY's sole but reasonable judgment and in accord with the provisions of applicable labor agreements. Each PARTY shall be the appointing authority for all its personnel provided to OPSG by this Agreement. PARTIES shall have no liability for any direct payment of salary, wages, indemnity, or other compensation or benefit to any other PARTY's personnel.

Each PARTY and its respective officers, agents, and employees are independent contractors and are not officers, agents, and employees of any other PARTY. Each PARTY's personnel are under the direct and exclusive supervision of that PARTY, and each PARTY assumes full responsibility for the performance of its own personnel in connection with this Agreement. No PARTY has the authority to bind any other PARTY.

6.4.3 Designated Operations Coordinators
SHERIFF shall select a Designated Operations Coordinator, at the rank of Sheriff's Lieutenant or higher, who shall manage and direct OPSG operations. All other PARTIES shall select a Designated Operations Coordinator for their respective agency under this Agreement. The Designated Operations Coordinator for each PARTY shall serve as their agency contact and shall implement, as needed, appropriate procedures governing the performance of all requirements under this Agreement and shall be responsible for meeting and conferring in good faith to address any disputes which may arise concerning implementation of this Agreement.

7 6.4.4 Staffing for Basic Services
PARTIES shall ensure that adequate numbers of their qualified respective personnel are always provided to Operations during the term of this Agreement to meet the Basic Services, Scope of Services, and Standards of Service commitments set forth herein.

6.4.5 Equipment and Supplies
COUNTY will provide SHERIFF OPSG personnel with all supplies and/or prescribed safety gear, body armor, and/or standard issue equipment necessary to perform Operations. Similarly, all other PARTIES will provide their respective OPSG personnel with all supplies and/or prescribed safety gear, body armor, and/or standard issue equipment necessary to perform Operations unless otherwise specified in Exhibit E - FY 2024 OPSG Operations Order.

6.4.5.1 PARTIES are responsible for the procurement of their own equipment to be used in Operations.

6.4.5.2 PARTIES shall maintain an inventory list of all equipment purchased with OPSG funds and when practicable, equipment shall be labeled with:
"Purchased with funds provided by the U. S. Department of Homeland Security".

7. COST OF SERVICES/CONSIDERATION

7.1 General

7.1.1 As full consideration for the satisfactory performance and completion by PARTIES of Operations set forth in this Agreement, COUNTY shall reimburse PARTIES for personnel assigned to perform Operations based on claims and submittals as set forth hereunder. Such payments by COUNTY are dependent on the continued availability of funds from the DHS passed through the Cal OES.

7.1.2 PARTIES agree that awarded funds identified as allowable costs, as set forth in Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual (PGM), shall be expended only for approved Operations operating expenses and equipment as detailed in Exhibit A – FY 2024 OPSG Budget Worksheet, and that unallowable costs are not reimbursable as set forth in Exhibit J – FEMA PGM.

7.1.2.1 Law enforcement activities, such as operational overtime costs incurred by increased patrol operations, in support of enhanced border security will be performed by peace officers who are certified to act as public safety officers, as described in paragraph 6.4.1.1 of this Agreement.

7.1.2.2 Personnel assigned to perform Operations may not work an overtime shift that exceeds 16 hours worked in any 24-hour period.

8 7.1.2.3 Unallowable OPSG activities include but are not limited to, costs associated with evidence collection, arrest processing, prosecution and Traffic/DUI checkpoints, such as evidence documentation cameras, fingerprinting supplies, alcohol breathalyzers, traffic barricades, and similar law enforcement expenses. General IT computing equipment, construction and/or renovation expenses, as well as exercise program costs are also prohibited under OPSG.

7.1.3 No reimbursement shall be made to a PARTY during any period within which that PARTY is in default on filing any informational or financial reports required by SHERIFF. SHERIFF shall make any necessary adjustments to PARTY claims to correct for overpayments, underpayments, or disallowances.

7.2 Project Costs/Rate of Compensation
SHERIFF shall reimburse PARTIES for overtime worked by personnel assigned to perform Operations and shall reimburse for costs approved in Exhibit E – FY 2024 OPSG Operations Order, based upon available funding and the actual costs incurred by PARTIES to provide Operations.

7.3 Reimbursement Method
PARTIES shall submit to SHERIFF, accurate and complete reimbursement forms, labor reports, timesheets, DARs, equipment and equipment maintenance invoices, procurement documents, purchase orders and/or contracts, and proof of payment, that represent amounts to be reimbursed under this Agreement within ninety (90) days from the date when expenditure was incurred or, within thirty (30) days if expenditure is incurred on February 28, 2027. All requests for reimbursement shall be sent to:

San Diego County Sheriff's Office
O-41 Grants Unit (OPSG)
P. O. Box 939062
San Diego, CA 92193-9062

7.3.1 Reimbursement forms and invoices must have the signature of PARTY's Authorized Agent, certifying that the invoice and substantiating documentation, e.g., DARs, timesheets, payroll and labor reports, procurement documents, etc., are true and correct.

7.3.2 PARTIES shall provide payroll records for each person whose costs are reimbursable under this Agreement, to include, at a minimum, the person's name, classification, duty position, task, regular hourly rate, overtime hourly rate, overtime hours worked, date(s) overtime worked, and fringe benefit rate and cost.

7.3.2.1 PARTIES shall make available to SHERIFF for inspection, upon request, all payroll records and any other records that relate to the Basic Services provided under this Agreement.

9 7.3.3 PARTIES shall submit to SHERIFF, verifiable and complete supporting documentation to substantiate reimbursement requests for service maintenance and/or equipment purchase, to include the equipment inventory ledger, certified true copies of invoice, purchase order, proof of payment to vendor and other procurement documentation. Compliance with the disclosure requirements of this Agreement by any PARTY shall not otherwise waive Attorney-Client privilege or any other privilege or exemption.

7.3.3.1 PARTIES shall provide procurement records that show proof of compliance to 2 CFR § 200.317-§ 200.327 requirements, and documents that substantiate full and open competition, to include but not limited to, copies of solicitation (RFQ, RFB, RFP), rationale for the method of procurement, contract policy, basis for the contract type and price, purchase request, statement of work and other pre-solicitation documents, cost/price analysis (if applicable), profit negotiation (if applicable), purchase orders, federal contract provisions with required language incorporated within contracts under federal award (as directed herein by Exhibit G – Appendix II Part 200), notice of award, record of protest, performance or other bond documents, specialized endorsements and request form approvals (if applicable), suspension and debarment listing, etc.

7.3.3.2 PARTIES shall make available to SHERIFF for inspection and upon request, all procurement records that provide historical and background information to answer inquiries pertaining to the acquisition of service maintenance and/or equipment that may arise in a review or audit or until the grant record retention period expires.

7.3.4 PARTIES shall ensure awareness, understanding, and compliance to all grant rules and procurement requirements. PARTIES shall be responsible in making sure that proper authorizations are in place for any OPSG equipment purchase that requires specialized endorsement or approvals, including waiver request forms or Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) review and compliance.

7.3.5 Noncompetitive procurements of equipment exceeding the $250,000 simplified acquisition threshold established by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48 CFR Subpart 2.1, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908, requires prior written approval from Cal OES.

7.3.5.1 Prior to purchasing equipment determined to be noncompetitive, PARTIES shall email SHERIFF a copy of their Purchasing Agent's approval for the noncompetitive procurement which SHERIFF will submit to Cal OES for approval.

7.3.6 PARTIES shall obtain a performance bond from vendors prior to procuring equipment over $250,000, or any vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft, regardless of contract amount, to be paid at the time of purchase, to ensure delivery of the equipment within ninety (90) days of the performance period end date.

10 7.3.6.1 Performance bond shall be included for reimbursement with invoice.

7.3.7 Within ninety (90) days of receipt of valid invoice and supporting documentation specified in subparagraphs under 7.3, SHERIFF will reimburse PARTIES for the Basic Services agreed to.

7.3.8 Each PARTY shall manage their allocation and track their claims to remain within their allocated amount as specified in Exhibit A – FY 2024 OPSG Budget Worksheet.

7.4 Reimbursement Disallowances
PARTIES not in compliance with procedures in paragraph 7.3 above risk having incurred expenditures disallowed for reimbursement by SHERIFF. PARTIES that fail to submit claims for reimbursement within ninety (90) days will be notified in writing by SHERIFF that the claim(s) is/are past due, and funds allocated to the PARTY for that period may be redistributed among other PARTIES.

8. PROGRAM/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION

8.1 PARTIES shall use as the primary reference in all programmatic, financial, and grant administration matters and adhere to the policies and regulations in Exhibit F - Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR Part 200), Exhibit H – FY 2024 HSGP NOFO, Exhibit I – FY 2024 HSGP CA Supplement to the NOFO and Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual, in conjunction with updates issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Grants & Training (G&T) information bulletins, and Cal OES policy, regulations, and statutes.

8.1.1 Contract Provisions
PARTIES shall ensure that all contracts adhere to all applicable procurement rules and regulations stated in 2 CFR § 200.317-§ 200.327 and described in Appendix II Part 200 - Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts under Federal Awards. Reimbursement claims associated with contracts found to be out of compliance will be denied.

8.1.2 Methods of Procurement
PARTIES shall adhere to the procurement methods found in 2 CFR 200, Subpart D, § 200.320.

8.1.3 Grant Requirements
PARTIES shall comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. 200 Subpart D, including requiring their contractors to comply with the applicable Federal Requirements contained in Exhibit C hereto.

11 9. REPAYMENT OF REIMBURSEMENTS

9.1 Any PARTY found through compliance assessments, audits, or monitoring site visits, to be out of compliance with paragraphs 7.3 and 8 above, shall retroactively repay SHERIFF, within ninety (90) days of notification, any reimbursement found out of compliance which was paid to PARTY during the term of, and even after the term, of this Agreement. This provision shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

10. INDEMNIFICATION – WORKERS' COMPENSATION, EMPLOYMENT AND

CLAIMS AND LIABILITY ISSUES

10.1 The COUNTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless non-County PARTIES and their respective officers, employees and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs and/or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of the COUNTY or any contract labor provider retained by the COUNTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or other such matters) which is brought by an employee of the COUNTY or any contract labor provider retained by the COUNTY.

10.2 Each non-County PARTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officers, employees, and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by non-County PARTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or other such matters) which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by the non-County PARTY.

10.3 Each non-County PARTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the other nonCounty PARTIES, its officers, employees, and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by non-County PARTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or

12 other such matters) which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by the non-County PARTY.

11. INDEMNIFICATION RELATED TO ACTS OR OMISSIONS; NEGLIGENCE

11.1 Claims Arising from Sole Acts or Omissions of a PARTY Each PARTY to this Agreement hereby agrees to defend and indemnify the other PARTIES to this Agreement, their agents, officers, and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding against the other PARTIES, arising solely out of its own acts or omissions in the performance of this Agreement. At each PARTY's sole discretion, each PARTY may participate at its own expense in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, but such participation shall not relieve any PARTY of any obligation imposed by this Agreement.

PARTIES shall notify each other promptly of any claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense.

11.2 Claims Arising from Concurrent Acts or Omissions
The PARTIES hereby agree to defend themselves from any claim, action, or proceeding arising out of the concurrent acts or omissions of the PARTIES. In such cases, PARTIES agree to retain their own legal counsel, bear their own defense costs, and waive their right to seek reimbursement of such costs, except as provided in paragraph 11.4 below.

11.3 Joint Defense
Notwithstanding paragraph 11.2 above, in cases where PARTIES agree in writing to a joint defense, PARTIES may appoint joint defense counsel to defend the claim, action, or proceeding arising out of the concurrent acts or omissions of PARTIES. Joint defense counsel shall be selected by mutual agreement of PARTIES. PARTIES agree to share the costs of such joint defense and any agreed settlement in equal amounts, except as provided in paragraph 11.4 below. PARTIES further agree that no PARTY may bind the others to a settlement agreement without the written consent of the others.

11.4 Reimbursement and/or Reallocation
Where a trial verdict or arbitration award allocates or determines the comparative fault of the parties, PARTIES may seek reimbursement and/or reallocation of defense costs, settlement payments, judgments, and awards, consistent with such comparative fault.

12. GENERAL PROVISIONS

12.1 Notices
Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and may be personally delivered or given as of the date of mailing by depositing such notice in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid and addressed as follows, or, to such other place as each PARTY may designate by subsequent written notice to each other:

13 To SHERIFF:

Sheriff
San Diego County Sheriff's Office
P. O. Box 939062
San Diego, CA 92193-9062
To Non-County PARTIES:

Chief Chief
Carlsbad Police Department Chula Vista Police Department 2560 Orion Way 315 Fourth Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92010 Chula Vista, CA 91910
Chief Chief
El Cajon Police Department Escondido Police Department
100 Civic Center Way 1163 North Centre City Parkway
El Cajon, CA 92020 Escondido, CA 92026
Chief Chief
La Mesa Police Department Oceanside Police Department
8085 University Avenue 3855 Mission Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942 Oceanside, CA 92058
Chief Chief
San Diego Harbor Police Department Sycuan Tribal Police Department 3380 North Harbor Drive 4 Kwaaypaay Court
San Diego, CA 92101 El Cajon, CA 92019

Chief Sheriff
University of California-San Diego Orange County Sheriff's Department Police Department 550 North Flower Street
9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0017 Santa Ana, CA 92703
La Jolla, CA 92093
Sheriff Sheriff
San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office Ventura County Sheriff's Office 1585 Kansas Avenue 800 South Victoria Avenue
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Ventura, CA 93009
Sheriff Sheriff
Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office Monterey County Sheriff's Office 4434 Calle Real 1414 Natividad Road
Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Salinas, CA 93906

14 Sheriff Chief
San Mateo County Sheriff's Office California Highway Patrol 330 Bradford Street Border Division
Redwood City, CA 94063 9330 Farnham Street
San Diego, CA 92123
Chief Chief
California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Department of Parks and Law Enforcement Division Recreation
1416 9th Street, Room 1326 P.O. Box 942896
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001
A notice shall be effective on the date of personal delivery if personally delivered before 5:00 p.m. on a business day or otherwise on the first business day following personal delivery; or two (2) business days following the date the notice is postmarked, if mailed; or on the first business day following delivery to the applicable overnight courier, if sent by overnight courier for next business day delivery and otherwise when received.

12.2 Amendment; Assignment
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document signed by the COUNTY through SHERIFF and the affected PARTY or PARTIES, and no oral understanding or agreement shall be binding on any PARTY or PARTIES. No PARTY shall assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other PARTIES.

12.3 Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of agreement among the COUNTY and non-County PARTIES with respect to the subject matter hereto. As such, all prior written and oral understandings are superseded in total by this Agreement.

12.4 Construction
This Agreement will be deemed to have been made and shall be construed, interpreted, governed, and enforced pursuant to, and in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. The headings and captions used in this Agreement are for convenience and ease of reference only and shall not be used to construe, interpret, expand, or limit the terms of the Agreement and shall not be construed against any one PARTY.

12.5 Waiver
A waiver by COUNTY or non-County PARTIES of a breach of any of the covenants to be performed by COUNTY or non-County PARTIES shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions, or conditions of this Agreement. In addition, the failure of any PARTY to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of any right to do so, whether for that breach or any subsequent breach. The acceptance by COUNTY or nonCounty PARTIES of either performance or payment shall not be considered a waiver of PARTY's preceding breach of this Agreement.

15 12.6 Authority to Enter Agreement
COUNTY and non-County PARTIES have all requisite power and authority to conduct their respective business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each PARTY warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective PARTY.

12.7 Cooperation
COUNTY through SHERIFF and Non-County PARTIES will cooperate in good faith to implement this Agreement.

12.8 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. SHERIFF will provide each PARTY with a copy of this Agreement once fully executed.

12.9 Severability
This Agreement is subject to all applicable laws and regulations. If any provision of this Agreement is found by any court or other legal authority, or is agreed upon by the PARTIES, to conflict with any law or regulation, then the conflicting provision shall be considered null and void. If the effect of nullifying any conflicting provision is such that a material benefit of this Agreement to any PARTY is lost, then the Agreement may be terminated at the option of the affected PARTY, with the notice as required in this Agreement. In all other cases, the remainder of this Agreement shall be severable and shall continue in full force and effect.

12.10 Legislative Changes
If any changes are made to regulations pursuant to which this Agreement is made or to any successor legislation or regulations, or if the U. S. DHS imposes any budget requirements or limitations applicable to this Agreement and the services to be provided hereunder, then (1) to the extent any of the changes are of mandatory application, such change(s) shall apply to the PARTIES in this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be amended to be consistent with such changes(s) except to the extent that such change(s) alter(s) a material provision of this Agreement in which case such material provision shall be voidable and the PARTIES will negotiate in good faith to amend the Agreement as necessary, and (2) to the extent any of the changes are not of mandatory application, such change(s) shall not affect this Agreement or the right or obligations of COUNTY and non-COUNTY under this Agreement unless the PARTIES mutually agree to subject themselves to such changes(s).

12.11 Representation
Each PARTY’s Chief, and/or Sheriff, or their respective designee, shall represent its PARTY in all discussions pertaining to this Agreement. SHERIFF, or his or her designee, shall represent COUNTY in all discussions pertaining to this Agreement.

16 12.12 Dispute Resolution Concerning Services and Payment In the event of any dispute concerning services and payment arising from this Agreement, representatives described in paragraph 12.11, will meet, and confer within ten (10) business days after receiving notice of the dispute to resolve the dispute.

12.13 Termination of Funding
If funding for reimbursement of costs related to Operations is terminated by the U. S.

DHS, this Agreement in its entirety shall be considered null and void and COUNTY through SHERIFF and PARTIES shall no longer be required to provide Operations as described herein. In such event, PARTIES shall meet immediately, and if agreed upon by the PARTIES, mutually develop and implement within a reasonable time frame, a transition plan for the provision of Operations through alternate means.

12.14 Obligation
This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors of the PARTIES.

12.15 California Law
This Agreement is executed and delivered within the State of California and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES hereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto approve and agree to the terms of this Agreement, such Agreement being effective April 10, 2025, unless otherwise specified.

Approved as to form and legality:

SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

___________________________ _____________________________ Kelly A. Martinez Mark Day
Sheriff Senior Deputy

CARLSBAD POLICE CHULA VISTA POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _____________________________ Christie Calderwood Roxana Kennedy
Chief Chief

17 EL CAJON POLICE ESCONDIDO POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _____________________________ Jeremiah Larson Ryan Banks
Chief Interim Chief

LA MESA POLICE OCEANSIDE POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _________________________________ Ray Sweeney Taurino Valdovinos
Chief Chief

SAN DIEGO HARBOR POLICE SYCUAN TRIBAL POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ ___________________________ Magda Fernandez Anthony O'Boyle
Chief Chief

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
___________________________ ___________________________ Lamine Secka Don Barnes
Chief Sheriff-Coroner
Approved as to form and legality:

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LEON J. PAGE

SHERIFF'S OFFICE THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

COUNTY OF ORANGE
___________________________ ___________________________ Ian Parkinson Wendy J. Phillips
Sheriff Senior Deputy

18 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY VENTURA COUNTY

SHERIFF'S OFFICE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
___________________________ ___________________________ Bill Brown James Fryhoff
Sheriff-Coroner Sheriff

MONTEREY COUNTY SAN MATEO COUNTY

SHERIFF'S OFFICE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
___________________________ ___________________________ Tina Nieto Christina Corpus
Sheriff-Coroner Sheriff

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

BORDER DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
___________________________ ___________________________ Tommie Cocroft Amy Mowrer
Chief Chief
Business Management Branch

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF PARKS AND RECREATION

___________________________
Lisa Tomas
District Superintendent

EXHIBIT A
FY 2024 OPERATION STONEGARDENANNUAL BUDGET WORKSHEET

SUMMARY

A B C D E FGH I
AGENCY NAME Operational OT Fringe Benefits Vehicle/Vessel Maint Equip Maint New/Replace Equip Fuel Costs Mileage Flight Costs M&A TOTAL San Diego County Sheriff's Office 195,350 2,881,610 - 55,710 810,000 - 231,646 54,743 353,971 4,583,030Carlsbad Police Department 618 36,351 - - - - 3,031 - - 40,000Chula Vista Police Department 1,429 98,571 - - - - - - - 100,000El Cajon Police Department 4,837 115,163 - - - - - - - 120,000Escondido Police Department - 10,000 - - - - - - - 10,000La Mesa Police Department 12,056 157,600 - - - - 5,344 - - 175,000Oceanside Police Department 1,357 93,606 29,037 - - 26,000 - - - 150,000San Diego Harbor Police Department 5,472 44,528 - - - - - - - 50,000Sycuan Tribal Police Department 143 9,857 - - - - - - - 10,000University of California San Diego Police Department 393 9,060 - - - - 547 - - 10,000Orange County Sheriff’s Department 31,536 306,476 26,368 - - 20,880 14,740 - - 400,000San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office 12,643 73,166 3,669 - 45,684 3,750 6,772 - - 145,684Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office - 138,532 12,880 - 43,081 25,650 7,318 15,620 - 243,081Ventura County Sheriff's Office - 355,620 20,047 - 19,306 47,488 - 26,845 - 469,306Monterey County Sheriff's Office 1,306 90,094 - - - - 8,600 - - 100,000San Mateo County Sheriff's Office 5,245 44,755 - - - - - - - 50,000CA Highway Patrol 5,841 402,795 - - 25,600 - 30,119 61,245 - 525,600CA Department of Fish and Wildlife 572 39,428 - - - - - - - 40,000CA Department of Parks and Recreation 1,452 100,151 18,789 - 100,000 5,990 3,618 - - 230,000 Grand Total San Diego County Region 5,007,363 $ 280,250 $ 110,790 $ 55,710 $ 1,043,671 $ 129,758 $ 311,73 $ 158,453 5 $ 353,971 $ 7,451,701 $ Budget Narrative Category

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 1 of 10 Initials _______

EXHIBIT B
Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) FY 2024 OPSG Standard Assurances
(All OPSG Participating Agencies of Friendly Forces)
Name of Agency: ___________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ City: _____________________________________ State: ______________ Zip Code: ______________ As the duly authorized representative of the Agency ("Agency") named above, I hereby certify that the Agency has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and has the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including sufficient funds to pay any non-federal share of project cost or to retroactively repay any reimbursement found out of compliance which was paid to Agency, for as long as the grant is active) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application, within prescribed timelines.

The requirements outlined in these assurances apply to Agency and any of its principals, contractors, and subcontractors.

I further acknowledge that the Agency is responsible for reviewing and adhering to all requirements within the:
(a) Applicable Federal Regulations (see below);
(b) Federal Program Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO); (c) Federal Preparedness Grants Manual;
(d) California State Supplement to the NOFO; and
(e) Federal and State Grant Program Guidelines.

Federal Regulations
Government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant programs are set forth in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) and adopted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at 2 C.F.R. §3002.10. Updates are issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/.

For necessary changes are made to the subaward, including changes to period of performance or terms and conditions, Agency will be notified of the changes in writing. Once notification has been made, any subsequent request for funds will indicate Agency acceptance of the changes to the subaward.

State and federal grant award requirements (some of which appear in the documents listed above) are set forth below. The Agency hereby agrees to comply with the following:

1. Proof of Authority
The Agency will obtain proof of authority from the city council, governing board or authorized body in support of this project. This written authorization must specify that the Agency and the city council, governing board or authorized body agree:
(a) To provide all matching funds required for the grant project and that any cash match will be appropriated as required;

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 2 of 10 Initials _______ (b) Any liability arising out of the performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Agency and the city council, governing board or authorized body; (c) Grant funds shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by the city council, governing board or authorized body;
(d) The Agency is authorized by the city council, governing body, or authorized body to apply for federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-federal share of project cost, if any, or to retroactively repay any reimbursement found out of compliance, which was paid to Agency, for as long as the grant is active) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application; and (e) The official executing this agreement is authorized by the Agency.

This Proof of Authority must be maintained on file and readily available upon request.

2. Period of Performance and Operational Project Period The period of performance is specified in the Award and the operational project period for the Agency is indicated in the FY2024 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The Agency is only authorized to perform allowable activities approved under the award, within the period of performance specified in the grant, within which, the operational project period for the Agency is enforced.

3. Lobbying and Political Activities
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.), for persons entering into a contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement from an agency or requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the Agency certifies that:
(a) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (b) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying”, in accordance with its instructions. (c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all Agencies shall certify and disclose accordingly.

The Agency will also comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and §§7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds.

Finally, the Agency agrees that federal funds will not be used, directly or indirectly, to support the enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy without the express written approval from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) or the federal awarding agency.

4. Suspension and Debarment
As required by Executive Orders (EO) 12549 and 12689, and 2 C.F.R §200.214 and codified in 2 C.F.R Part 180, Debarment and Suspension, the Agency will provide protection against waste, fraud and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the federal government. The Agency certifies that it and its principals, contractors, or subcontractors:

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 3 of 10 Initials _______ (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (4)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

Where the Agency is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application.

5. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
The Agency will comply with all state and federal statutes relating to non-discrimination, including:
(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law (P.L.) 88-352 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin and requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded educational program or activity;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination against those with disabilities or access and functional needs; (d) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, and requires buildings and structures be accessible to those with disabilities and access and functional needs;
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age;
(f) Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd --- 2), relating to confidentiality of patient records regarding substance abuse treatment;
(g) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R Part 100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units --- i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units (all units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators) --- be designed and constructed with certain accessible features (See 24 C.F.R § 100.201);
(h) Executive Order (E.O.) 11246, which prohibits federal contractors and federally assisted construction contractors and subcontractors, who do over $10,000 in Government business in one year from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, or national origin;
(i) Executive Order (E.O.) 11375, which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, or national origin in hiring and employment in both the United States federal workforce and on the part of government contractors; (j) California Public Contract Code § 10295.3, which prohibits discrimination based on domestic partnerships and those in same sex marriages;

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 4 of 10 Initials _______ (k) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations, under which the Agency must comply with equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R. Part 19;
(l) The Agency will comply with California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (California Government Code § 12940 – 12957), as applicable. FEHA prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of ancestry, familial status, race, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, genetic information, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of medical and family care leave, or pregnancy disability leave, military and veteran status, and/or retaliation for protesting illegal discrimination related to one of these categories, or for reporting patient abuse in tax supported institutions;
(m) Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made; and
(n) The requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.

Civil Rights Policies for Program Beneficiaries and Subrecipients of DHS funding, pertaining to the following are available on the Cal OES website:
 Non-discrimination in Programs & Services
 Reasonable Accommodation for Program Beneficiaries
 Language Access Policy

6. Drug-Free Workplace
As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.), the Agency certifies that it will maintain a drug-free workplace and a drug-free awareness program as outlined in the Act.

7. Environmental Standards
The Agency will comply with state and federal environmental standards, including:
(a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177), to include coordination with the city or county planning agency; (b) CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, §§ 15000-15387); (c) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), which establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters;
(d) Federal Clean Air Act of 1955 (42 U.S.C. § 7401), which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources;
(e) Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (P.L. 91-190); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA; and Executive Orders (EO) 12898 which focuses on the environmental and human health effects of federal actions on minority and low-income populations with the goal of achieving environmental protection for all communities; (f) Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 11988; (g) Executive Order (EO) 11514 which sets forth national environmental standards; (h) Executive Order (EO) 11738 instituted to assure that each federal agency empowered to enter into contracts for the procurement of goods, materials, or services and each federal agency empowered to extend federal assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract shall undertake such procurement and assistance activities in a manner that will result in effective enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Executive Order (EO) 11990 which requires preservation of wetlands;
(i) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, (P.L. 93-523);

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 5 of 10 Initials _______ (j) The Endangered Species Act of 1973, (P.L. 93-205);
(k) Assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.); (l) Conformity of Federal Actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.); and (m) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.

The Agency shall not be: 1) in violation of any order or resolution promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution district; 2) subject to a cease-and-desist order pursuant to § 13301 of the California Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or 3) determined to be in violation of federal law relating to air or water pollution.

8. Audits
For grant recipients expending $1,000,000 or more in federal grant funds annually, the Agency will perform the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and C.F.R., Part 200, Subpart F Audit Requirements.

9. Cooperation and Access to Records
The agency must cooperate with any compliance reviews or investigations conducted by DHS. In accordance with 2 C.F.R § 200.337, the Agency will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award. The Agency will require any grant recipients, contractors, successors, transferees and assignees to acknowledge and agree to comply with this provision.

10. Conflict of Interest
The Agency will establish safeguards to prohibit the Agency's employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.

11. Financial Management
False Claims for Payment - The Agency will comply with 31 U.S.C § 3729-3733 which provides that Agency shall not submit a false claim for payment, reimbursement or advance.

12. Reporting - Accountability
The Agency agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (P.L. 109-282), including but not limited to (a) the reporting of subawards obligating $30,000 or more in federal funds, and (b) executive compensation data for first tier subawards as set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 170, Appendix A. The Agency also agrees to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide financial assistance award term regarding the System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements located at 2 C.F.R. Part 25, Appendix A.

13. Whistleblower Protections
The Agency must comply with statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. § 2409, 41 U.S.C. § 4712, and 10 U.S.C. § 2324, 41 U.S.C. § 4304 and § 4310.

14. Human Trafficking
The Agency will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104) which prohibits the Agency or its grant recipients from: (1) engaging in trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect; (2) procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or (3) using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 6 of 10 Initials _______

15. Labor Standards
The Agency will comply with the following federal labor standards:
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-7), as applicable, and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145 and 18 U.S.C. § 874) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction contracts or subcontracts, and (b) The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.) as they apply to employees of institutes of higher learning (IHE), hospitals and other non-profit organizations.

16. Worker’s Compensation
The Agency must comply with provisions which require every employer to be insured to protect workers who may be injured on the job at all times during the performance of the work of this Agreement, as per the workers compensation laws set forth in California Labor Code §§ 3700 et seq.

17. Property-Related
If applicable to the type of project funded by this federal award, the Agency will:
(a) Comply with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally assisted programs.

These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchase;
(b) Comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires federal grant recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more;
(c) Assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470), Executive Order (EO) 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1 et seq.); and
(d) Comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4831 and 24 C.F.R. Part 35) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

18. Certifications Applicable Only to Federally Funded Construction Projects For all construction projects, the Agency will:
(a) Not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project; (b) Comply with the requirements of the awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications; and
(c) Provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms to the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State.

19. Use of Cellular Device While Driving is Prohibited
The Agency is required to comply with California Vehicle Code Sections 23123 and 23123.5. These laws prohibit driving motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication. Drivers are also prohibited from the use of a wireless telephone without hands-free listening and talking, unless to make an emergency call to 911, law enforcement, or similar services.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 7 of 10 Initials _______

20. California Public Records Act and Freedom of Information Act The Agency acknowledges that all information submitted in the course of applying for funding under this program, or provided in the course of an entity’s grant management activities that are under federal control, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the California Public Records Act, California Government Code § 7920.000 et seq. The Agency should consider these laws and consult its own state and local laws and regulations regarding the release of information when reporting sensitive matters in the grant application, needs assessment, and strategic planning process.

21. Acknowledgement of Federal Funding from DHS
The Agency must acknowledge its use of federal funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposal, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal funds.

22. Activities Conducted Abroad
The Agency must coordinate with appropriate government authorities when performing project activities outside the United States and obtain all appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals.

23. Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) DHS defines personally identifiable information (PII) as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual. If the Agency collects PII, the Agency is required to have a publicly available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of PII it collects. The Agency may refer to the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments:

Privacy Guidance and Privacy template a useful resource.

24. Copyright
The Agency must affix the applicable copyright notices of 17 U.S.C. §§ 401 or 402 to any work first produced under federal awards and also include an acknowledgement that the work was produced under a federal award (including the federal award number and federal awarding agency). As detailed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.315, a federal awarding agency reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for federal purposes and to authorize others to do so.

25. Duplicative Costs
Agency is prohibited from charging any cost to this federal award that will be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federal award in either the current or a prior budget period. (See 2 C.F.R. § 200.403(f)). However, the Agency may shift costs that are allowable under two or more awards where otherwise permitted by federal statutes, regulations, or the federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.

26. Energy Policy and Conservation Act
The Agency must comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6201 which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.

27. Federal Debt Status
The Agency is required to be non-delinquent in its repayment of any federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. See OMB Circular A-129.

28. Fly America Act of 1974
The Agency must comply with Preference for United States Flag Air Carriers: (a list of certified air carriers can be found at: Certified Air Carriers List | US Department of Transportation, https://www.transportation.gov/policy/aviationpolicy/certificated-air-carriers-list) for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. § 40118) and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in the

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 8 of 10 Initials _______ March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B-138942.

29. Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
In accordance with Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, the Agency must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space funded in whole or in part with federal funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.

30. Non-supplanting Requirement
If the Agency receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that prohibit supplanting by law, the Agency must ensure that federal funds do not replace (supplant) funds that have been budgeted for the same purpose through non-federal sources.

31. Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
The Agency is subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. and applicable regulations governing inventions and patents, including the regulations issued by the Department of Commerce at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 (Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Awards, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements) and the standard patent rights clause set forth at 37 C.F.R. § 401.14.

32. SAFECOM
If the Agency receives federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communication equipment and its related activities, the Agency must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications.

33. Terrorist Financing
The Agency must comply with Executive Order (EO) 13224 and United States law that prohibit transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. The Agency is legally responsible for ensuring compliance with the EO and laws.

34. Reporting of Matters Related to Subrecipient Integrity and Performance If the total value of the Agency's currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all federal assistance offices exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of this federal financial assistance award, the Agency must comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference in the award terms and conditions.

35. USA Patriot Act of 2001
The Agency must comply with the requirements of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 175- 175c.

36. Use of DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags
The Agency must obtain written permission from its DHS prior to using the DHS seal(s), logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials, including use of the United States Coast Guard seal, logo, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Coast Guard officials.

37. Performance Goals
In addition to the Biannual Strategy Implementation Report submission requirements outlined in the Preparedness Grants Manual, the Agency must demonstrate how the grant-funded project addresses the core capability gap associated with each project. The capability gap reduction must be addressed in the Project Description of the BSIR for each project.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 9 of 10 Initials _______

38. Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes The DHS Standard Terms and Conditions are a restatement of general requirements imposed upon the Agency and flow down to sub tier subrecipients and contractors as a matter of law, regulation, or executive order. If the requirement does not apply to Indian tribes or there is a federal law or regulation exempting its application to Indian tribes, then the acceptance by Tribes of, or acquiescence to, DHS Standard Terms and Conditions does not change or alter its inapplicability to an Indian tribe. The execution of grant documents is not intended to change, alter, amend, or impose additional liability or responsibility upon the Tribe where it does not already exist.

39. Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials The Agency must comply with the "Build America, Buy America" Act (BABAA), enacted as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Executive Order (EO) 14005. Agencies receiving a federal award subject to BABAA requirements may not use federal financial assistance funds for infrastructure projects unless:
(a) All iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States – this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States;
(b) All manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States – this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and
(c) All construction materials are manufactured in the United States – this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States.

The "Buy America" preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. It does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project.

Nor does a "Buy America" preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desk, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project.

Per Section 70914(c) of BABAA, FEMA may waive the application of a "Buy America" preference under an infrastructure program in certain cases.

40. E.O. 14074 - Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
The Agency must comply with the requirements of Section 12(c) of Executive Order (EO) 14074. The Agency is also encouraged to adopt and enforce policies consistent with Executive Order (EO) 14074 to support safe and effective policing.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 10 of 10 Initials _______

IMPORTANT
The purpose of the assurance is to obtain federal and state financial assistance, including any and all federal and state grants, loans, reimbursement, contracts, etc. The Agency recognizes and agrees that state financial assistance will be extended based on the representations made in these assurances. These assurances are binding on the Agency, its successors, transferees, assignees, etc. as well as any of its principals, contractors, and subcontractors. Failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination, or reduction of grant funds.

All appropriate documentation, as outlined above, must be maintained on file by the Agency and available for Cal OES or public scrutiny upon request. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the grant or termination of the grant or both and the Agency may be ineligible for award of any future grants if Cal OES determines that the Agency: (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

All of the language contained within this document must be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers. Agencies are bound by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Standard Terms and Conditions 2024, Version 3, hereby incorporated by reference, which can be found at: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy15- dhs-standard-terms-and-conditions.

The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the above-named Agency.

Name of Agency:

Signature of Authorized Agent:

Printed Name of Authorized Agent:

Title: Date:

Email Address: ____________________________________________________________

EXHIBIT C
Homeland Security Grant Program – FY2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG)

REQUIRED FEDERAL GRANT PROVISIONS

1. Termination for Default. In the event of Contractor's breach of this Agreement, County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in whole or in part.
(a) Prior to termination for default, Contracting Officer will send Contractor written notice specifying the default.

Contractor shall have ten (10) days from issuance (unless a different time is given in the notice) to respond to the notice as directed by County to acknowledge the default or show cause as to why Contractor is not in default. Such notice may provide Contractor the opportunity to cure the default or to demonstrate progress towards curing the default. If Contractor fails to respond, or if Contractor’s response is not satisfactory to the County, County may terminate this Agreement for default upon written notice from Contracting Officer. (b) If County determines that the default contributes to the curtailment of an essential service; poses an immediate threat to life, health, or property; or constitutes fraud or other serious misconduct, County may terminate this Agreement for default by written notice from the Contracting Officer. (c) In the event of termination for default, all finished or unfinished documents, and other materials, prepared by Contractor under this Agreement shall become the sole and exclusive property of County. (d) If, after termination for default, it is determined for any reason that Contractor was not in default under this Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if terminated for convenience under section 2. “Termination for Convenience.”

2. Termination for Convenience. The County may, by written notice from Contracting Officer, terminate this Agreement for convenience, in whole or in part, at any time. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor shall promptly report to County all undelivered or unaccepted work performed in accordance with this Agreement prior to termination (“Incomplete Work”). Contractor may, at County’s option, be required to complete some or all Incomplete Work during disentanglement.
(a) The County shall pay Contractor as full compensation for work performed and costs of termination:
i. The unit or pro rata price for any delivered and accepted portion of the work. ii. Actual and reasonable Contractor costs for Incomplete Work not mitigable or otherwise recoverable by Contractor. Such compensation shall not exceed the unit or pro rata price due to Contractor had the work been completed.
(b) In no event shall the County be liable for any loss of profits or any other consequential damages. (c) County's termination of this Agreement for convenience shall not preclude it from changing the termination to a default, as set forth in section 1. of this Agreement, nor from taking any action in law or equity against Contractor for:
i. Fraud, waste, or abuse of Agreement funds, or
ii. Improperly submitted claims, or
iii. Any failure to perform the work in accordance with the Statement of Work, or iv. Any breach of any terms or conditions of the Agreement, or

v. Any actions under any warranty, express or implied, or vi. Any claim of unprofessional negligence, or
vii. Any other matter arising from or related to this Agreement, whether know, knowable, or unknown before, during, or after the date of termination.

3. Contracting with Small and Minority Businesses, Women's Business Enterprises, and Labor Surplus Area Firms.

Contractor shall, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.321, take affirmative steps to include minority business, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firm by:
(a) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists; (b) Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources;
(c) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; (d) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; and (e) Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce.

4. Clean Air Act and The Federal Water Pollution Control Act. [for contracts more than $150,000] (a) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
(b) The Contractor agrees to report each violation to the County and understands and agrees that the County will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. (c) The Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with federal assistance.
(d) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (e) The Contractor agrees to report each violation to the County and understands and agrees that the County will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. (f) The Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with federal assistance.

5. Debarment and Suspension.
(a) This Agreement is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. 180 and 2 C.F.R. 3000. As such, the Contractor is required to verify that none of the Contractor’s principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. 180.935).
(b) The Contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.

(c) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by County. If it is later determined that the Contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to County, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.

6. Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1352 and related regulations, (a) Contractor certifies, and shall require each lower-tier recipient (as that term is defined in 31 U.S.C. 1352) to certify to the tier above, that it will not and has not used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any covered federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352, and (b) Contractor shall disclose, and shall require each lowertier recipient to disclose to the tier above, any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any covered federal award.

7. Procurement of Recovered Materials.
(a) In the performance of this Agreement, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired:
i. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; ii. Meeting contract performance requirements; or
iii. At a reasonable price.
(b) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensiveprocurementguideline-cpg-program. (c) The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.

8. Domestic Preferences. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.322, as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, Contractor shall, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). This requirement shall be included in all subcontracts under this Agreement. (a) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, must occur in the United States. (b) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of nonferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

9. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.216, Contractor and its subcontractors are prohibited from expending funds under this Agreement to:
(a) Procure or obtain;
(b) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (c) Enter a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).

i. For public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). ii. Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. iii. Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

10. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. [for contracts more than $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers] If mechanics or laborers are to be employed under this Agreement, Contractor shall comply with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 5). Contractor shall compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer based on a standard work week of 40 hours. Work more than the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked more than 40 hours in the work week. Contractor shall not require any laborer or mechanic to work in surroundings or under working conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous.

11. Equal Employment Opportunity. During the performance of this Agreement, the Contractor agrees as follows:
(a) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(b) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (c) The Contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the Contractor's legal duty to furnish information.
(d) The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (e) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

(f) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (g) In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Agreement or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(h) The Contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (a) and the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (h) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance:

Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The applicant further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided, that if the applicant so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the Agreement. The applicant agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The applicant further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the applicant agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

12. Davis-Bacon Act. [for construction contracts more than $2,000] (a) All transactions regarding this Agreement shall be done in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141- 3144, and 3146-3148) and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. 5 as may be applicable. The Contractor shall comply with 40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148 and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. 5 as applicable. (b) Contractors are required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. (c) Additionally, contractors are required to pay wages not less than once a week.

13. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act. [for construction or repair contracts more than $2,000] (a) Contractor. The Contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. (b) Subcontracts. The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as the federal funding agency may by appropriate instructions require, and a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all these contract clauses.
(c) Breach. A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the Agreement, and for debarment as a Contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R. 5.12.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant – Certification Regarding Lobbying P a g e 1 | 2

EXHIBIT D
Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING UNDER FY2024 OPSG
(All OPSG Participating Agencies)
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard FormLLL, 'Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,' in accordance with its instructions.

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

FY 2024 Operation Stonegarden Grant – Certification Regarding Lobbying P a g e 2 | 2 Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING UNDER FY2024 OPSG
(All OPSG Participating Agencies)
The Subrecipient, as identified below, certifies, or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Subrecipient understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Chap. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.

Name of Agency: ________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Agent: _______________________________________________ Printed Name of Authorized Agent: ___________________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________________

APPENDIX A
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Operations Order Report
Op Order Name: SDC OPERATION STONEGARDEN (OPSG) FY2024
Op Order Number: 24-SDCSDC-09-002
Op Dates: From: 09/01/2024 To: 08/31/2027 (POP)
Report Date: 09/18/2024
(U) Warning: The information contained herein remains under the control of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Dissemination is for authorized law enforcement purposes only. (U) This document contains information that is UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (U//FOUO). It contains information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552).

It is to be controlled, stored, handled, transmitted, distributed, and disposed of in accordance with DHS policy relating to FOUO information and is not to be released to the public, the media, or other personnel who do not have a valid need-to-know without prior approval of an authorized CBP official. (U) Privacy Act 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) “No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains [subject to 12 exceptions].” OOs and OPSG Operational documents contain shared intelligence, information, targeted enforcement information, Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of USBP and partner State, Local, and Tribal law enforcement entities. PII should not be released as it places public safety officials in danger from illicit actors and shared intelligence and information should not be disclosed without notice and permission from the contributing law enforcement agencies.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Law enforcement partnerships between federal, state, and local entities are critical to improving operational control of the border. Grant funding in the amount of $7,451,701 via Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) will be utilized by a total of 19 partner law enforcement agencies from local units of government within San Diego County, including the Sycuan Tribal Police Department, Sheriff's Departments from San Diego, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Mateo Counties, as well as California State Agencies to target border-related crime in the U.S./Mexico Border area and the California coastline. The San Diego County Sheriff’s Office (SDSO) will be the OPSG Grant Administrator. The point-of contact (POC) will be Lieutenant Chris Katra. The USBP San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent will have operational oversight. The POC will be Assistant Chief Patrol Agent Anna Sofchek.

The USBP San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent (CPA), in coordination/collaboration with OPSG stakeholders, will determine which areas will be the focus of operations. Security threats and operational hours/activities will be determined jointly between the San Diego Sector unified command staff and the OPSG Integrated Planning Team (IPT). Maritime-specific operations will be coordinated jointly with the San Diego Regional Coordinating Mechanism (ReCoM), Los Angeles/Long Beach ReCoM, Central California Maritime Agency Coordination Group (CenCal MAC), and the San Francisco ReCoM.

Utilizing an all-threats approach in collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), state and local law enforcement agencies will exercise their

unique jurisdictional capabilities in order to collaboratively address border security issues.

Historically, San Diego County has been a highly favored operational area for crime and drug smuggling organizations. The close proximity of Tijuana, Mexico to San Diego, California, population density, significant coastline, and extensive transportation networks leading to the interior immediately north of the border make San Diego a consistently lucrative target. Now, as the maritime smuggling threat increases, these organizations are looking for smuggling opportunities beyond San Diego County as demonstrated by Pangas being discovered more than 400 miles north in San Mateo County. Border-related crime represents an all-threat environment in that the primary criminal activity (drug/human smuggling) often results in cross-border criminal organizations and individuals undertaking secondary and frequently, tertiary criminal activities that involve a wider range of crimes (kidnappings, assaults, murders, money laundering, cross-border weapons trafficking, etc.). These criminal activities, when undertaken in the U.S., constitute a threat to domestic security, subsequently triggering involvement by state and local law enforcement.

I. SITUATION
A. General Situation:

San Diego County (SDC) includes approximately 60 miles of international land border, and the responsibility of the San Diego Sector includes the 931 miles of coastal border of the State of California, including beaches and bays. SDC has an effective level of security that is commensurate with known and identified risks associated with criminal organizations. The incidence of border violence associated with competing drug cartels in the Tijuana/Tecate areas has continued and still has great potential to spread into the United States. Frequent assaults against Border Patrol Agents are a common diversionary tactic utilized by smuggling organizations to further their criminal activity. During a particularly volatile situation on July 23, 2009, Border Patrol Agent Robert Rosas was murdered in close proximity to the border fence while responding to an incursion in the Campo Station area of responsibility (AOR). As security of the border is established and/or expanded within key target zones, criminal organizations resort to increasingly elaborate smuggling methods such as sophisticated cross-border tunnels, watercraft in the maritime environment, and ultra-light aircraft. U.S.

Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego Sector Operation Division will address specific threats posed by such organizations and aggressively integrate OPSG assets to reduce violent crime along the border, increase border security, and improve the quality of life within affected communities throughout the San Diego Sector operational AOR.

As the maritime threat continues to increase in San Diego Sector's AOR, it has been necessary to provide additional funding and support along the coast to address emerging maritime Panga smuggling events approximately 489 miles north in Monterey, Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties.

Since its inception, the intent of OPSG has been to enhance law enforcement preparedness and operational readiness along the nation’s borders. The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act 2010 (PL 111-83), via the

Homeland Security Grant Program, allocated $81 million in FY 2024 OPSG grant funds for use by local units of government to increase coordination and enforcement capabilities in support of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) goals including those outlined in the Border Patrol National Strategy. For this grant year, the San Diego Sector has been awarded $7,451,701 in FY 2024 OPSG Homeland Security Grant funds.

B. Terrain/Weather:

Terrain features within the San Diego Sector include beaches, estuaries, coastal plains, steep canyons and ravines, high desert, and mountains over six thousand feet in elevation. There are numerous environmentally sensitive and protected areas. Dense, low-lying brush and scrub trees cover much of the rural terrain throughout.

San Diego County’s western corridor is one of the most densely populated areas in the United States. The corridor includes the cities of San Diego, Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, Coronado, Encinitas, Carlsbad, and Oceanside. The County’s central corridor is comprised primarily of a blend of sparsely populated remote and rural wilderness areas. The eastern corridor consists of rural mountain and ranching enclaves with populations ranging from a few hundred up to several thousand.

Orange County through San Mateo County represents a rugged coastline along with varying weather. Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties include the Channel Islands. These islands are remote and desolate and represent an area of great concern for the San Diego Sector.

California State Parks and the California Highway Patrol are working together in remote areas from Ventura to San Mateo with the Sheriff’s Offices in each of those counties as the Maritime threat continues to move north along the California Coast.

Weather conditions vary greatly throughout the San Diego Sector. The western corridor generally maintains year-round mild temperatures that average 50 to 80 degrees. The central and eastern corridors can experience extremes in temperatures ranging from subfreezing to well over 100 degrees. Eastern portions of the County can experience occasional snowfall and high winds. In addition, the western portion of the San Diego Sector experiences frequent coastal eddies (a combination of low clouds and fog), which extend several miles inland.

Wildfires are a very real and persistent threat throughout the San Diego Sector.

The fire season extends from May through November. Historically, wildfires have resulted in the devastating loss of life and property.

The combination of climatic extremes, rugged terrain, dense urban corridors, and protected environmental areas presents a complex challenge to conducting daily operations. As such, enforcement entities operating within the counties utilize considerable ingenuity and flexibility in order to achieve their missions.

C. Criminal Element:

Drug smuggling organizations continue to pose significant threats throughout the area. These organizations have become increasingly sophisticated and use counter surveillance, diversionary tactics, night vision devices, and secure communications while conducting operations. Human trafficking, trans-border kidnappings, extortion, murder, and intimidation are common results of cartel competition for lucrative territory. Criminal debriefings, examination of pocket trash, and officer observations indicate substantial intelligence gathering efforts against law enforcement operations by area criminal organizations.

Smugglers frequently utilize dangerous tactics in order to further their cargo into the United States. Among these are failures to yield when vehicle or checkpoint stops are initiated, abandonment of the smuggling vehicle by the driver while it is still in motion, wrong way driving on freeways north through the Mexican Port of Entry into the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, and the overloading of boats with human cargo. The abandonment of individuals or entire groups by their guides in remote, inhospitable environments is not uncommon and has resulted in a significant number of deaths. Smuggling organizations using these, and other tactics, have been historically responsible for several assaults on Border Patrol Agents and local law enforcement officers.

D. Friendly Forces:

San Diego County Sheriff’s Office
San Diego Harbor Police
Carlsbad Police Department
Chula Vista Police Department
Escondido Police Department
La Mesa Police Department
El Cajon Police Department
Oceanside Police Department
Sycuan Tribal Police Department
Ventura County Sheriff's Office
Orange County Sheriff's Department
Monterey County Sheriff’s Office
Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office
San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office
San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office
California Highway Patrol
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Department of Parks and Recreation
University of California San Diego Police Department

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION AND THE FIRST READING

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LA MESA AMENDING THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
(INCLUDING CHAPTER 2.32, SECTION 2.16.15(D)(6),
CHAPTERS 9.04, 9.05 AND 9.06) TO DO THE
FOLLOWING:

DESCRIPTION: (1) RENAME (A) “COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT” TO “PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT,” (B) “COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMISSION” TO “PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION,” AND (C) “DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
SERVICES” TO “DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND
RECREATION;” AND, (2) SHIFT THE SUPERVISORY

RESPONSIBILITY OF LANDSCAPING AND

MAINTENANCE OF PARK AREAS TO THE CITY
MANAGER OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE.

ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council introduce and conduct a first reading of an ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code (Including Chapter 2.32, Section

2.16.15(D)(6), Chapters 9.04, 9.05 And 9.06) to do the following:

1. Rename (A) “Community Services Department” to “Parks and Recreation Department,” (B) “Community Services Commission” to “Parks and Recreation Commission,” and (C) “Director of Community Services” to “Director of Parks and Recreation;” and,

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date:

Page: 2 of 4

2. Shift the supervisory responsibility of landscaping and maintenance of park areas to the City Manager or his or her designee.

Recommendation:

Introduce and conduct a first reading of the following:

An ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code (Including Chapter 2.32, Section 2.16.15(D)(6), Chapters 9.04, 9.05 And 9.06) to do the following:

1. Rename (A) “Community Services Department” to “Parks and Recreation Department,” (B) “Community Services Commission” to “Parks and Recreation Commission,” and (C) “Director of Community Services” to “Director of Parks and Recreation;” and,

2. Shift the supervisory responsibility of landscaping and maintenance of park areas to the City Manager or his or her designee.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the recommendation.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

In 1990, the City renamed the Parks and Recreation Department to the Department of Community Services and updated the Commission’s name accordingly to reflect a broader service-oriented focus. Overtime, the term “Community Services” has caused confusion among residents, who often associate it with social services, public safety, or community outreach rather than parks and recreation programming.

At the April 8, 2025, City Council meeting, at the request of Mayor Arapostathis and Councilmember Suzuki, the City Council directed staff to:

1. Draft the necessary amendments to the La Mesa Municipal Code to rename the Department of Community Services back to the Department of Parks and Recreation.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date:

Page: 3 of 4

2. Update all associated commissions’ names accordingly and return to the City Council within 90 days with a draft ordinance for consideration. Update all position titles currently associated with the Department of Community Services to reflect the Parks and Recreation name.

3. Conduct outreach to inform employees, residents and stakeholders of the transition and provide information about the changes.

DISCUSSION:

In response to City Council direction, staff has reviewed the La Mesa Municipal Code and is proposing amendments to reflect the renaming of the Community Services Department and Commission to the Parks and Recreation Department and Commission. Several sections of the Municipal Code require updates to reflect this change, including Chapter

2.32, Section 2.16.015(D)(6), and Chapters 9.04, 9.05, and 9.06.

Additionally, staff recommends amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to shift supervisory responsibility for the landscaping and maintenance of park areas to the City Manager or their designee. This change is intended to provide greater administrative flexibility by allowing the City Manager to assign these responsibilities to the most appropriate department based on organizational needs.

The proposed changes are outlined in Attachment A.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and conduct a first reading of the following:

An ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code (Including Chapter 2.32, Section 2.16.15(D)(6), Chapters 9.04, 9.05 And 9.06) to do the following:

3. Rename (A) “Community Services Department” to “Parks and Recreation Department,” (B) “Community Services Commission” to “Parks and Recreation Commission,” and (C) “Director of Community Services” to “Director of Parks and Recreation;” and,

4. Shift the supervisory responsibility of landscaping and maintenance of park areas to the City Manager or his or her designee.