La Mesa City Council
December 9, 2025

6 11.04.130 Section 505.3 Added – Response Map Updates
Section 505.3 of the CFC is added to read as follows:
505.3 Response map Updates. Any new development, which necessitates updating of the emergency response maps by virtue of new structures, hydrants, roadways or similar features, shall be required to provide map updates in a format compatible with current department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all response maps.

11.04.200 Section 5704.2.9.6.1 Amended – Location where above-ground tanks are prohibited
Section 5704.2.9.6.1 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:

Location where above-ground tanks are prohibited. Storage of Class I and Class II liquids in above-ground tanks outside of buildings is prohibited except for zones classified as commercial or industrial.

11.04.210 Section 5706.2.4.4 Amended – Location where above-ground tanks are prohibited
Section 5704.2.4.4 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:
5705.2.4.4 Location where above-ground tanks are prohibited. Storage of Class I and Class II liquids in above-ground tanks outside of buildings is prohibited except for zones classified as commercial or industrial.

11.04.220 Section 5806.2 Amended – Limitations
Section 5806.2 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:
5802.2 Limitations. Storage of flammable cryogenic fluids in stationary containers outside of buildings is prohibited except for zones classified as commercial or industrial.

11.04.230 Section 6104.2 Amended – Maximum capacity within established limits Section 6104.2 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:
6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The geographic limits in which the bulk storage of liquefied petroleum gas is prohibited for the protection of heavily populated and congested areas is hereby established as jurisdiction limits of the City of La Mesa except for areas zoned for industrial use."

11.05. 010 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code 2025 Edition – Adopted by reference
The California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, 2025 Edition, as adopted by the California Office of the State Fire and published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference as the Wildland-Urban Interface Code of the city, for protecting the interests of health, life and safety as they relate to the use or occupancy of building or premises. The California

7 Wildland-Urban Interface Code is referred to in this chapter as the "CWUIC" and one copy is on file in the office of the city clerk.

SECTION 3: Constitutionality. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council of the City of La Mesa hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, respective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid. Such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of the Ordinance are declared to be severable.

SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2025 and the City Clerk of the City of La Mesa is hereby authorized to use summary publication procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 utilizing a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of La Mesa.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 12th day of November 2025, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 9 th day of December 2025, by the
following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk

8 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Ordinance No. 2025- 1
Attachment B
Amended

11.04.010 California Fire Codes, 20252 Edition – Adopted by reference The California Fire Code, 20252 Edition, as adopted by the California Office of the State Fire Marshal and including Appendix Chapters 4, B, BB, C, CC, H, and O but excluding section 109 112 and 1132.4 as published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference as the fire code of the city (the "fire code"), for protecting the interests of health, life and safety as they relate to the use or occupancy of building or premises. All of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of the California Fire Code 20252 Edition, are referred to, adopted and made a part of this chapter as though fully set out in this chapter, excepting such portions as are added, deleted, modified or amended by this chapter. The California Fire Code is referred to in this chapter as the "CFC" and one copy is on file in the office of the city clerk.

Explanation:

Updated code edition and code sections referenced which were changed in the International Fire Code.

11.04.020 – Repealing of Previous Ordinance
Ordinance 2019-2878 22-2901of the City of La Mesa adopting by reference the California Fire Code, 202219 Edition, known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9 incorporating the International Fire Code, 202118 Edition, published by the International Code Council, and all other ordinances or parts of ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed Explanation:

Updated ordinance number and edition of the Fire Code being repealed.

11.04.080 Section 1087 Amended and Added – Schedule of Fees Section 1087.2 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:
1087.2 Schedule of fees. The permit fees for all permits authorized by this code shall be as listed in the City of La Mesa Schedule of Fees.

Section 1087.2.15 of the CFC is added to read as follows:
1087.2.17 Cost Recovery. This section is to establish authority to obtain reimbursements from responsible individuals for the expenses of any emergency response and/or code enforcement action by the City of La mesa Fire Department to protect the public from fire or hazardous substances and situations as allowed by the general laws if the State of California and the La Mesa Municipal Code.

Section 1087. 7 of the CFC is added to read as follows:
1087.7 Reimbursements. (a) in accordance with the Health as Safety Code Section 13000 et

Ordinance No. 2025- 2
seq., any individual who acts negligently or in violation of the law and thereby requires the jurisdiction to provide an emergency response to a danger posed by a fire or hazardous substances shall be liable for reimbursement to the agency for the cost incurred.(b) In accordance with Government Code Sections 53150 through 53158, any individual who is under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug or the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug, and whose negligent operation of a motor vehicle, boat or vessel, or civil aircraft caused by that influence, proximately causes any incident and thereby requires that agency to provide an emergency response shall reimburse the agency for the cost incurred.

Section 1087.8 of the CFC is added to read as follows:
1087.8 Expense Recovery. This section establishes authority to obtain from responsible individuals for the expanse of any emergency response and/or enforcement action by the City of La Mesa Fire Department to protect the public from fire, hazardous substances and dangerous situations as allowed under the La Mesa Municipal Code and by laws if the State of California.

Section 1087.9 of the CFC is added to read as follows: 107.9 Cumulative Remedies. The remedies contained in this code are cumulative and inclusive of other remedies contained in the La Mesa Municipal Code. Nothing herein prevents the City Attorney or appropriate enforcement officer from pursuing remedies at law or equity to address violations of this code. Nothing herein shall prevent the application of civil remedies authorized by La Mesa Municipal Code Section

1.12.010(e).

Explanation:

Updated code sections referenced which were changed in the International Fire Code.

11.04.050 Section 1121 Amended - Board of Appeals
Section 1121 of the CFC is amended to read as follows:

Appeals Board. Appeals to the decisions or determinations made by the Fire Marshal or Fire Code Official relative to the application and interpretation of the Fire Code adopted by the City, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Fire Chief and the City Manager within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision appealed and further defined in the City of La Mesa Municipal Code 11 .12. 030.

Explanation:

Updated code sections referenced which were changed in the International Fire Code.

11.04.040 Section 503.3.1 Added – Fire Lane Designation Section 503.3.1 of the CFC is added to read as follows:
503.3.1 Fire lane designation. Where the fire code official determines that it is necessary to ensure adequate fire access, the fire code official may designate existing roadways as fire access roadways as provided by Vehicle Code Section 22500.1 (public) or 22658(a) (private).

Explanation:

Updated code section in the title.

Ordinance No. 2025- 3

11.05.010 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code 2025 Edition – Adopted by reference
The California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, 2025 Edition, as adopted by the California Office of the State Fire and published by the International Code Council, is adopted by reference as the Wildland-Urban Interface Code of the city, for protecting the interests of health, life and safety as they relate to the use or occupancy of building or premises. The California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is referred to in this chapter as the "CWUIC" and one copy is on file in the office of the city clerk.

Explanation:

Added the new State adopted California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to the referenced codes in Title 11.

DATE: December 9, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Misty Thompson, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
Amanda Lee, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE FIELD ALLOCATION

AND USE POLICY AND REPEALING THE EXISTING FIELD USE

SCHEDULING POLICY
BACKGROUND:

In May 2005, the City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Field Use Scheduling Policy for the La Mesa Athletic Council Leagues for use of City and School District fields scheduled by the City. The City currently coordinates field allocations for sixteen (16) athletic organizations across twenty-five (25) fields. This policy provides the framework for field assignments and is primarily utilized to resolve conflicts when multiple groups request the same field during the allocation process.

After two decades, the current policy requires an update to ensure fair and equitable field allocation for City and La Mesa Spring Valley School District athletic fields administered by the Parks and Recreation Department for all members of the community. The proposed revisions aim to consolidate related policies, incentivize leagues to maximize service to La Mesa residents, and establish clear criteria that prioritize community needs and demographic equity in scheduling decisions.

DISCUSSION:

At the November 12, 2025 City Council meeting, staff requested adoption of the updated Field Allocation and Use Policy. Following discussion, City Council directed staff to address the public comments and bring back the item for consideration at a future meeting. Staff reviewed the policy and adjusted the scoring rubric based on public comment. Following the review, the revised policy was sent to the Athletic Council for review. On December 2, 2025, staff met with the Athletic Council to review the policy and answer any questions by League representatives.

At this time, staff recommends replacing the current Field Use Scheduling Policy with the Field Allocation and Use Policy (Attachment A). This version addresses concerns raised at the November 12 City Council meeting, and includes all previous revisions to improve the field allocation process:
 Policy Consolidation: Merge the current City Sponsorship guidelines directly into the Field Allocation and Use Policy, providing a single reference point for all sponsored league practices.
 Residency Requirement Timeline: Create a structured timeline for sponsored leagues to demonstrate growth in La Mesa residency numbers, with the goal of prioritizing leagues that serve La Mesa residents.
 Youth Use Prioritization: Separate Youth field use into two distinct categories:

Recreation and Competitive. Under the new policy, Recreational use will be given clear priority over competitive use in step 1 of the conflict resolution.  Adult and Senior Prioritization: Separate field use for Adults and Seniors by age, granting Seniors (ages 55+) priority over general adult leagues.  Creation of a Scoring Rubric: Establish a quantitative scoring rubric to determine field priority when conflicts arise. This rubric will be based on league factors including:
o Residency tier (percentage of La Mesa participants)
o Gender Equity (opportunities provided)
o Amount of time received prior to the request (fair distribution) o Past performance (policy adherence, field maintenance, etc.) o Season of play (peak vs. non-peak demand)
At the November 6, 2025, La Mesa Parks and Recreation Commission Special Meeting, the Commissioners reviewed the updated policy and approved to recommend that the City Council approve the updated policy.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Field Allocation and Use Policy and repeal the existing Field Use Scheduling Policy.

Attachments:

A. Resolution
B. Field Allocation and Use Policy

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING THE FIELD ALLOCATION AND USE POLICY AND REPEALING

THE EXISTING FIELD USE SCHEDULING POLICY
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Athletic Council was established to unite athletic organizations within the City of La Mesa;
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2005, the City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Field Use Scheduling Policy for the La Mesa Athletic Council leagues for use of City and School District fields scheduled by the City;
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa currently coordinates field allocations for sixteen (16) athletic organizations across twenty-five (25) fields;
WHEREAS, staff recommend replacing the current Field Use Scheduling Policy with the Field Allocation and Use Policy; and
WHEREAS, the Field Allocation and Use Policy will ensure fair and equitable field allocation for City of La Mesa and La Mesa Spring Valley School District athletic fields administered by the Parks and Recreation Department for all members of the community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council adopts the updated Field Allocation and Use Policy.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

1 City of La Mesa
Parks and Recreation

FIELD ALLOCATION AND USE POLICY
DRAFT – December 2025
I. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to provide fair and equitable field allocation for City of La Mesa (City) and La Mesa Spring Valley School District (District) athletic fields administered by the Parks and Recreation Department for all members of the community. This policy establishes a clear and comprehensive priority system to resolve scheduling conflicts when multiple user requests compete for the same field time.

II. Priority of Field Use
Athletic fields are allocated based on the following priority, as outlined in the Field Use Agreement:

A. City and District Use: Exclusive priority for City-sponsored programs on City fields and District-sponsored programs on District fields.

B. Sponsored Youth Leagues: Youth sports Leagues that are in good standing and maintain City sponsorship.

C. Sponsored Adult and Senior Leagues: Adult and senior sports Leagues that are in good standing and maintain a City Sponsorship.

D. All Other Users: Remaining Leagues, organizations, and private rentals will be assigned on a first-come, first-served basis.

III. City Sponsorship
City sponsorship of any sports league (League) is established through a Sponsorship Agreement. This agreement shall be between the City and the League and requires the League to adhere to all City sponsorship criteria requirements, and the City agrees to assume limited responsibilities, primarily focused on providing facilities and special needs. Leagues are expected to be self-sufficient regarding their organization, leadership, and program management.

A. Sponsorship Requirements: To be sponsored, a League must meet the following:

1. The organization must be structured to serve a constructive recreational purpose benefiting the community.

2. The organization must be a non-profit (must produce state identification number).

3. The League shall not restrict participation by any individual on the basis of religion, race, ethnic background, sex, social, economic status or any other protected class.

4. The League must maintain membership where at least 51% of all participants are residents of the City of La Mesa.

Leagues who were members of the La Mesa Athletic Council (Athletic Council) prior to the enactment of the 51% resident requirement will adhere to a transition plan to reach this requirement.
a. By January 1, 2028, residency numbers shall be at least 35%.

2 b. By January 1, 2030, all groups must have 51% La Mesa residency.

To calculate the percentage of residents/non-residents, the City shall use the average of the two most recent regular seasons. Participant rosters must be submitted to the Recreation Supervisor each season.

5. Leagues must ensure the Parks and Recreation Department is fully informed of all activities, needs and operational matters. To ensure compliance, the League must meet the following requirements:
a. Designate a contact person annually that is responsible for working with the Department’s representative regarding the use and scheduling of facilities, the issuance of City keys (and collection of League keys) and who will attend the Athletic Council meetings as scheduled.
b. Submit a copy of the League’s bylaws and all current board members’ names and emails.
c. Provide a schedule of play, including opening and closing dates, prior to the opening of regular season play.
d. Provide full roster documentation verifying the residency/non-residency of all participants.

6. League must be in full compliance with all City or District limitations, requirements and regulations related to use of a facility.

7. No advertising shall be posted and no solicitation or sales shall be conducted on facility grounds without written permission from the Department representative.

B. City’s Responsibility and Service: The City, through the Parks and Recreation Department, may provide one or more of the following services:

1. Secure and schedule use of City and District facilities.

2. Use of City facilities (meetings, banquets) at the non-profit rate during regular facility hours.

3. Use of certain City equipment and materials.

4. Priority scheduling for sponsored groups for the use of District facilities, as applicable under the Joint Use Agreement.

C. Procedure for Initiating Sponsorship: The process for a League to initiate and obtain City sponsorship requires the following steps:

1. League requesting sponsorship must first obtain copies of the City’s sponsorship information, fee schedule, and application form.

2. League must submit the completed sponsorship application and make an appointment with the Department representative.

3. League representative must meet with the Department representative to discuss the following:
a. City’s sponsorship requirements.
b. City’s rules, regulations and rental charges for the use of facilities. c. League’s schedule for activities.
d. League’s method of financing.

3 e. Payment of fees (Athletic Council dues, facility use, CIP). f. City services provided (facilities, equipment, etc.). g. Name, address and phone number of contact person responsible for working with the City.
h. League bylaws and board member information.

4. The Director of Parks and Recreation reserves the right to grant exemptions to the sponsorship requirements based on the needs of the City.

D. Extension and Evaluation of Sponsorship: Sponsorship by the City will be authorized for a one-year period, commencing on January 1. At the close of each year, sponsorship may be authorized for an additional year following a joint review conducted by the Department representative and the League representative. This mandatory annual review evaluates the League's adherence to the following conditions: Signed Facility Use Agreements, proof of insurance, payment of fees, and attendance at Athletic Council meetings.

E. Termination of Sponsorship: The City reserves the right to terminate sponsorship for the use of City or District facilities by providing written notice to the sponsored League if any of the following occur:

1. League fails to comply with the sponsorship requirements for the use of facilities.

2. League fails to respond in a timely manner to damages to property resulting from League activities.

3. Mutual consent by the City and League.

IV. Facility Allocation Priorities
City sponsored organizations in good standing will have requests for overlapping field usage scheduled according to the following criteria:

Step 1:

A. Recreational based

1. Youth games

2. Youth practices
B. Competitive (Club/Travel)

1. Youth games

2. Youth practices
C. Senior Play (55+)

1. Senior games

2. Senior practices
D. Adult Use

1. Adult games

2. Adult practices

4 Recreational Program is defined as a League with open enrollment accepting participants on a first-come, first-serve basis regardless of skill level. These programs are introductory and have a minimum play rule that ensures each player receives a minimum prescribed amount of playing time, regardless of skill level, promoting fairness over competition.

Competitive League is defined as a League which holds tryouts to place registrants according to their ability on competitive teams. A group that forms teams through an individual selection process or tryout intended to identify elite athletes, and not all players are accommodated.

Step 2:

In the event that multiple users of the same age tier request the same field, the City will consider additional factors to resolve the scheduling conflict including:

Proof of Residency
Residency will be verified from the previous year’s corresponding season.

First priority tier 85-100% La Mesa residents
Second priority tier 70-84%
Third priority tier 51-69%
Last priority tier 0-50%
Gender Equity
AB 2404, California Fair Play in Community Sports Act, requires that girls be given equal opportunities to participate in community youth sports programs, both in quality and scope, as those provided to boys.

First priority tier 50% or more female
Second priority tier 49% or below female
Amount of time received in allocated season
The number of hours requested by an organization in the current allocation season will be evaluated based on the ratio of total hours to the verified participant count from the previous year’s corresponding season.

Past Performance
This criterion reviews the League’s history of full compliance with all terms and conditions as described in the Field Use Agreement, including, but not limited to, submitting fees and all required documentation within the specified time frames.

Season of Play
While many athletic programs operate on a year-round basis, sport seasons are based on “traditional” athletic time frames for allocation priority.

Primary Season Spring Baseball/Softball/Lacrosse/Rugby
Fall Football/Soccer
Secondary Season Spring Football/Soccer
Fall Baseball/Softball/Lacrosse/Rugby

5 The rubric for the above items will be scored as follows:

Proof of Residency 85-100% 70-84% 51-69% 0-50%
3 2 1 0
Gender Equity 50-100% female 0-49% female
2 1
Amount of time Primary season
Less than
14 hours/player
Secondary
Less than
7 hours/player
Primary season
Greater than
14 hours/player
Secondary
Greater than
7 hours/player
5 3 0 0
Past Performance No breeches Minimal
reminders
needed
Official warnings
issued in past
season
2 1 0
Season of Play Primary Secondary
3 1
The League with highest score that remains in contention after all criteria are applied to resolve the scheduling conflict will be granted allocation priority.

V. Policies and Procedures

1. The City shall have discretion to resolve schedule conflicts as needed if not resolved by above steps.

2. Any disputes regarding field use should be addressed first to the Athletic Council. If there is no successful resolution to the dispute, the matter may then be forwarded to the Recreation Supervisor, then to the Director of Parks and Recreation, and then to the Parks and Recreation Commission.

3. The City reserves the right to limit field use during any program period.

4. Fields will not be scheduled for use during the period of yearly maintenance/renovation, as scheduled by the Parks and Recreation Department.

5. A request for a particular athletic field does not guarantee availability or assignment to a specific organization. There is no guarantee on year-to-year use of fields.

6. Field use allocation is not transferable, and all users will ensure that no unauthorized usage outside of the allocated intent is granted permission to the field or any portion thereof, including submitting or re-allocation fields without prior approval from City staff.

7. Field users must use good judgment when assessing field conditions and not use fields when conditions are such that said use is likely to cause injury to participants or result in damage to the playing surface.

8. All managers, coaches, and persons in charge of a group using the fields will be responsible for the conduct of all participants, spectators and others connected with the activity, including visiting teams and opponents.

9. City staff may deny an applicant use request or terminate use if they determine that substantial evidence exists that one or more of the following has occurred:

6 a. Required documentation is not submitted.
b. Field and light usage fees are not paid within the specified time frame. c. A history of field damage, violations of field use agreements, or inadequate supervision of attendees is noted.
d. Discrimination of any protected class.
e. Participants of the requesting organization have demonstrated dangerous or violent behavior towards others or among themselves, and/or participants/organizations whose literature/stated philosophy promotes hatred and/or violence.
f. Progressive disciplinary measures to address spectator, coach, official, or athlete behavioral problems are not established or followed.
g. Assigned fields are sublet or re-allocated without prior approval from Parks and Recreation staff.
h. The use of the fields can or may cause damage to the facility or harms or threatens to harm an individual.

10. The City shall have the right to deny the use of a field to any person or organization at any time and/or impose a penalty for any user, group, or organization not complying with this policy and its rules and regulations.

DATE: December 9, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: POLICE CHIEF’S QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT (JULY 2025 – SEPTEMBER 2025)
Please see the attached report.

Quarterly Report
3rd Quarter 2025
Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
Prepared by Crime Analysis

1 Crime Trends and Statistics
The 3rd quarter of 2025 concluded with 17.4 total crimes per thousand residents, down from 19.1 in the third quarter of 2024. Violent crime increased by 5.3%, and property crime decreased by 11.2% compared to the third quarter of 2024.

FBI Part 1 Crimes, 3rd Quarter Year to Date
Historical Violent Crime Comparison, 3rd Quarter Year to Date Incidents of homicide and rape decreased compared to the same period last year, while robbery and aggravated assault increased. Robberies rose by 6%. 60% of aggravated assault victims knew the suspect. Additionally, 30% of aggravated assaults during the 3rd quarter of 2025 were related to domestic violence.

2 Case Clearances
On May 26, 2025, at approximately 5:00 PM, two unidentified suspects robbed a victim of a gold bracelet in the 4500 block of Pomona Avenue in the City of La Mesa. The approximate value of the bracelet was $1,000. The suspects fled to a waiting vehicle down the street, where two additional suspects were inside. The victim pursued the suspects on foot and was struck by the vehicle during the chase. As the suspects fled, the driver of the vehicle pointed a firearm at the victim. Home video surveillance provided a clear image of the suspect vehicle, and officers conducted an investigative check using the Flock Safety License Plate Detection System. La Mesa Detectives later set an alert in the Flock System for the vehicle.

On May 30, 2025, officers received a Flock alert on the vehicle, located it, conducted a traffic stop, and contacted the driver. The vehicle was towed to the La Mesa Police Department on an evidence hold. On 06/13/2025, La Mesa Police Detectives executed a search warrant on the vehicle. During the search, Detectives located a loaded, unserialized “ghost gun” under the driver’s seat. The firearm contained 15 rounds of 9mm ammunition in the magazine and had an empty chamber.

On July 1, 2025, at approximately 7:30 AM, La Mesa Police Detectives contacted the suspect at their residence in the City of El Cajon. The suspect was arrested and transported to San Diego Central Jail.

Historical Property Crime Comparison, 3rd Quarter Year to Date Compared to the previous third quarter, residential burglaries increased by 36%, with 67% of those cases involving no forced entry or an attempted burglary. Commercial burglaries decreased by 26%, thefts decreased by 6%, and auto thefts decreased by 37%.

3 Case Clearances
On June 21, 2025, at approximately 5:22 AM, an unknown suspect burglarized Deano’s Pub, located on the 5200 block of Baltimore Drive in the City of La Mesa. The suspect forced entry through the front door and targeted the cash register and ATM. Video surveillance captured footage of the suspect.

On June 26, 2025, at approximately 3:00 AM, two unknown suspects again burglarized Deano’s Pub, located on the 5200 block of Baltimore Drive. The suspects forced entry through the front door and targeted the ATM. The suspects used an unknown cutting tool to cut open the side of the ATM but were unable to remove the internal cash box. At the time of the report, there was no identified loss other than property damage. Officers on scene reviewed the business’ video surveillance and obtained a partial plate from the suspect vehicle as it fled the area. The vehicle was also captured by the City of La Mesa’s Flock camera system during the time period of this crime.

On June 28, 2025, at approximately 1:10 AM, two unknown suspects burglarized Surf Rider Pizza Company, located on the 8300 block of La Mesa Boulevard. The suspects breached a lock box, accessed a key, and unlocked the rear door to make entry. Once inside, they targeted the safe, using an unknown cutting tool to open it and remove cash.

On July 11, 2025, at approximately 1:22 AM, an unknown suspect burglarized Mastiff Kitchen, located on the 4200 block of Palm Avenue. The suspect forced entry through the side door, targeted the cash register, and removed a safe from inside the business.

La Mesa Police Detectives identified these cases as part of a larger county-wide burglary series targeting safes.

Two suspects were arrested and booked into San Diego Central Jail for all four cases.

4 Supervised Persons in the City
Registered Sex Offenders
There are currently eighty-three (83) active sex registrants in the city, eight (8) of whom are transient individuals. Throughout the year, patrol officers conduct compliance checks on the registrants living in La Mesa. Four (4) registrants were out of compliance during the third quarter of 2025, meaning they have not completed their annual or monthly check-in and residency verification as required.

Traffic Unit
Traffic Collisions
2025
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD
Total Traffic Collisions 78 82 67 227
Collisions Involving Injury 41 45 38 124
Total Vehicle Occupants Reporting Injury 54 56 55 165
Occupants Reporting Serious Injury 2 2 4 8
Fatality 1 0 1 2
Top Three Collision Locations

1. La Mesa Blvd and University Ave.

2. Baltimore and El Cajon Boulevard

3. Baltimore Drive and Lake Park
Traffic Enforcement Operations 3rd Quarter
Date Enforcement Operations Focus Location Total Officers 7/4/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 3 8/7/2025 DUI Enforcement Know Your Limits Citywide 2
8/8/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 2 8/21/2025 DUI Enforcement Know Your Limits Citywide 2
8/22/2025 DUI Enforcement DUI Checkpoint Citywide 13
8/22/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 4 8/22/2025 Traffic Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 3 8/29/2025 Traffic Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 3 8/30/2025 Traffic Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 3 9/1/2025 Traffic Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 3
9/6/2025 DUI Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 2
9/19/2025 DUI Enforcement DUI Saturation Citywide 2

5 School Resource Officers
The School Resource Officer (SRO) met with school staff as requested regarding numerous issues on campuses throughout the City.

The SRO responded to approximately one hundred and twenty-eight (128) calls for service. Approximately fifty-four (54) of those calls for service involved a school. The SRO took eight (8) new cases, one (1) of which resulted in a detention as per 5150 W&I. The SRO submitted one (1) case to the District Attorney’s Office and closed (6) cases by various means.

The SRO completed the following additional tasks/trainings:
• Trained Journey Church security and school staff on ALICE Training Model in response to violent threats
• Trained staff at The Table: United Methodist Church on ALICE Training Model in response to violent threats
• Coordinated and participated in instructing Active Shooter Response Training for all sworn personnel
• Attended School Threat: Active Assailant Investigations Course • Met with Northmont Elementary Safety Patrol to discuss the importance of their role • Completed safety walk through with Principal of St. Martin of Tours Academy • Trained staff at St. Martin of Tours Preschool on ALICE Training Model in response to school threats
• Completed Vulnerability Assessment for St. Martin of Tours Preschool • Attended Threat Assessments for Targeted Violence Course Community Engagement and Information Sharing
Social Media
During the 3rd quarter, Crime Prevention planned and coordinated National Night Out and Safety Fair events.

Social Media Platform Followers
Nextdoor 27,266 La Mesa Residents
Facebook 9,226
X (formerly Twitter) 6,025
Instagram 5,291

6 Events and Presentations
On August 5, 2025, the La Mesa Police Department, Heartland Fire & Rescue, and City officials joined Neighborhood Watch groups across La Mesa for their National Night Out events. National Night Out is a nationwide initiative that strengthens partnerships between law enforcement and the community to help keep neighborhoods safe. By hosting neighborhood gatherings, residents had the chance to connect with one another while meeting La Mesa public safety personnel and City officials.

On September 13, 2025, the Department hosted its annual Safety Fair in the Civic Center parking lot. The event provided residents the opportunity to meet police officers and firefighters, explore emergency vehicles, and learn about local resources through various community booths.

New Officers
None.

Lateral Police Officers
None.

Vacancies
The Department currently has five police officer vacancies and five Police Dispatcher vacancies. Applications are being accepted for the following positions: Police Officer Lateral/Academy Graduate and Police Dispatcher Experienced. Please visit the City of La Mesa’s website for more information or to apply.

Officer Training
During the third quarter, sworn personnel completed their quarterly firearms qualifications, active shooter training, and domestic violence update training.

Crime Prevention and Outreach Services
Neighborhood Watch Meetings 0
Community Presentations 3
Residential Security Inspections 0
Commercial Security Inspection 0
Position Authorized Filled Vacancies
Sworn Officers 73 68 5
Dispatchers 14 9 5
Community Service Officers 6 6 0

7 Home Team Success Story
In June 2025, the HOME Team encountered a veteran who reported experiencing homelessness since 2019. After meeting with this individual, the team began building rapport and exploring available resources that could support them. The veteran shared that while they were aware the VA offered some services, they did not realize the VA specifically provided housing support. They also felt they lacked the guidance needed to begin accessing these services.

The HOME Team quickly connected the veteran to a VA-funded program operated through PATH called Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF). SSVF is a housing-first program that assists veterans in securing housing through rental assistance while they work toward financial stability and self-sufficiency.

To help the veteran fully utilize this program, the HOME Team assisted with obtaining a California LifeLine-funded phone and provided transportation to view potential rental units.

Before moving into housing, the team also connected the veteran to Stand Down, an annual event in San Diego that offers veterans access to essential services. At this event, the veteran began the process of being assessed for service-related disabilities and connected with an employment program designed to help veterans reenter the civilian workforce.

After several unit viewings, the veteran successfully secured housing on August 20, 2025.

Department Demographics
Race/Ethnicity Total Officers Percent of Officers
Asian 2 2.8%
Black or African American 7 9.9%
Hispanic or Latino 14 19.7%
Pacific Islander 1 1.4%
White 47 66.2%
Grand Total 71 100.0%

8 Department Wellness
The Department remains committed to our staff's wellness and offers various resources to our police officers and professional staff. Our Peer Support Team responded to several callouts during the past quarter to support staff impacted by critical incidents. Our Facility Dog, Declan, has also been called upon to provide unconditional love and support to those team members impacted by trauma, stress, and the often-challenging realities of first responder work. The La Mesa Police Department contracts with a local mental health clinician who is culturally competent in assisting first responders with processing life and work trauma. This clinician is an invaluable asset and helps us protect our people so they can continue to protect you.

Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Reporting
The Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 prohibits racial and identity profiling by law enforcement and requires all agencies to annually report vehicle and pedestrian stop information, as well as citizen complaints of profiling, to the California Attorney General’s Office. The La Mesa Police Department began collecting stop information in 2022 in compliance with the legislation. The latest report from the California RIPA Board can be found on the California Attorney General’s website by following the link:
https://oag.ca.gov/ab953/board/reports
California Incident-Based Reporting
Historically, the La Mesa Police Department has reported crime statistics using the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary Statistics program with the FBI. California and the nation have now transitioned to new standardized reporting systems: the California Incident-Based Reporting System (CIBRS) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). These new systems allow for the robust reporting of fifty-two offense types, an increase from 8 offense types under UCR. Reported data includes case details to more accurately analyze crime trends statewide and nationally.

La Mesa Police Department
Quarterly Crime Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Homicide 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 3 -33.3%
Cleared 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Rape 4 5 5 2 2 6 2 10 14 -28.6%
Cleared 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 N/C
Robbery 9 13 10 19 11 13 10 34 32 6.3%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 3 5 4 12 13 -7.7%
Aggravated Assault 34 50 37 60 32 44 57 133 121 9.9%
Cleared 21 33 25 38 26 29 44 99 79 25.3%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Residential 17 8 11 20 15 13 21 49 36 36.1%
Commercial 23 16 23 11 10 15 21 46 62 -25.8%
Burglary Total 40 24 34 31 28 28 42 98 98 0.0%
Cleared 6 10 6 7 8 8 11 27 22 22.7%
Car Prowl (Included in Theft) 34 26 19 24 21 23 24 68 79 -13.9% Theft > $400 92 73 54 58 65 43 76 184 219 -16.0%
Theft $400 or less 102 73 75 63 81 86 88 255 250 2.0%
Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 129 164 439 469 -6.4%
Cleared 26 26 14 26 31 26 43 100 66 51.5%
Auto Theft 52 37 41 30 29 22 31 82 130 -36.9%
Cleared 1 0 2 3 3 3 5 11 3 266.7%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Total Violent 47 69 54 81 47 63 69 179 170 5.3%
Cleared* 53.2% 56.5% 51.9% 60.5% 61.7% 55.6% 69.6% 62.6% 54.1% 15.6% Total Property 286 207 204 182 203 179 237 619 697 -11.2% Cleared* 11.5% 17.4% 10.8% 19.8% 20.7% 20.7% 24.9% 22.3% 13.1% 70.8% FBI Index 333 276 258 263 250 242 306 798 867 -8.0%
Cleared* 17.4% 27.2% 19.4% 32.3% 28.4% 29.8% 35.0% 31.3% 21.1% 48.4% Violent Rate per 1000 Pop. 3.9/K 3.7/K
Property Rate per 1000 Pop. 13.5/K 15.4K
Index Rate per 1000 Pop. 17.4/K 19.1/K
2024
Violent Crime
Property Crime
Totals
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/23/25
*Percentage change by number of crimes cleared.

N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Robbery and Theft - 3rd Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Street/Highway 2 6 0 4 1 5 3 9 8 12.5%
Commercial 4 5 7 7 5 5 6 16 16 0.0%
Gas or Service Station 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 N/C
Chain Store 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 2 5 -60.0%
Residential 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 N/C
Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 1 0 2 4 4 1 0 5 3 66.7%
Robbery Total 9 13 10 19 11 13 10 34 32 6.3%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 2 5 4 11 13 -15.4%
YTD Clearance Rate 32%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr done 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Pocket-Picking 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 -66.7%
Purse Snatching 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 3 3 0.0%
Shoplifting 59 36 35 29 43 48 65 156 130 20.0%
From Motor Vehicles 55 46 41 39 35 33 44 112 142 -21.1% Motor Vehicle Parts & Acc. 38 19 16 12 13 14 12 39 73 -46.6% Bicycles 5 8 3 3 9 -1 3 11 16 -31.3%
From Buildings 24 27 25 23 37 27 25 89 76 17.1%
From Coin Operated Mach. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
All Others 11 6 8 15 6 7 15 28 25 12.0%
Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 129 164 439 469 -6.4%
Cleared 26 26 14 19 31 26 43 100 66 51.5%
YTD Clearance Rate 23%
2024
Robbery
Theft
2024 2025
2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/23/25 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Patrol Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Primary 4818 4715 4920 4824 4294 4491 4796 13581 14453 -6.0% Officer Initiated 2927 1892 2129 1882 2567 2491 2875 7933 6948 14.2% Reports Taken 1376 1290 1330 1268 1131 1413 1412 3956 3996 -1.0% Arrests Made 349 395 374 424 367 469 469 1305 1118 16.7% 5150 Detentions 112 94 85 76 92 74 76 242 291 -16.8%
Citations 473 434 499 448 643 639 442 1724 1406 22.6%
Parking/ Muni Code Citations 113 117 79 112 82 137 166 385 309 24.6% Field Interviews 140 142 182 170 113 161 185 459 464 -1.1% 2024 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/23/25 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Additional Detailed Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2025
Robbery Location Type 2025 Cleared % Solved
Street/Highway 9 3 33.3%
Commercial 16 6 37.5%
Gas or Service Station 1 0 0.0%
Chain Store 2 1 50.0%
Residential 1 1 100.0%
Bank 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 5 0 0.0%
Total 34 11 32.4%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Ghost Gun(s) Recovered Incident 0 4 0 0 2 4 2 8 4 100.0% Fentanyl Related Incident 4 7 6 4 1 6 5 12 17 -29.4%
Naloxone Used Incident 5 3 5 4 1 2 1 4 13 -69.2%
Reported Hate Crimes 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0.0%
A single incident may reflected in each appliable category, dependent on incident circumstances. 2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Race 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Religion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Sexual Orientation 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 N/C
Gender 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Citizenship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
None/Unknown Bias 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change Communications 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Violence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Vandalism 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 N/C
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
N/C: Not Calculable
2025
2025
There are 37 reportable bias motivations and 14 reportable offensive acts. To facilitate a more readable data table, only the bias motivations and offensive acts for reported hate crimes will be broken down under each category.

Robbery Clearances
Year to Date Totals
2024
Details of Hate Crimes Reported to Law Enforcment
Incidents of Special Study and County Interest
Crimes by Bias Motivation 2024
Crimes by Offensive Act 2024
Each reported hate crime is listed twice, once under the relevant bias motivation and again under the category of offensive act.

Data are only available for incidents reported to the La Mesa Police Department. 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/23/25
N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Communications - 3rd Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr YTD YTD % Change 9-1-1 6656 6924 7490 6832 6366 6508 7103 19977 21070 -5.2% 9-1-1 Answer Time 1 99% 99% 99% 99% 98% 97% 98% 98% 99% -1.0% Total Calls to the Department 25090 27256 28318 25413 24397 25345 27256 76998 80664 -4.5% Total Calls For Service 2 15369 15225 16308 15001 14933 15274 16757 46964 30594 53.5% Source:
9-1-1 6074 6300 7069 6535 6077 6185 6782 19044 19443 -2.1% Text 9-1-1 3 32 11 4 9 8 6 13 27 47 -42.6%
Non-Emergency 4870 5370 6063 5792 5428 5690 6109 17227 16303 5.7% Officer Initiated 2928 2270 2582 2444 3206 3059 3467 9732 7780 25.1% Walk Ins 255 262 320 221 223 334 386 943 837 12.7%
HOME 4 443 473 463 458 465 631 680 1776 1379 28.8%
4 The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) is an initiative of the City of La Mesa, in collaboration with the La Mesa Police Department. LMPD Dispatchers route the HOME team (City outreach workers) as primary responders to non-emergency calls for service that do not require a police presence.
2024
2 Calls for Service include all calls that generate agency response and officer initiated contact including, assisting citizens, traffic stops, pedestrian stops, front counter contacts, extra patrol, etc.
3 Capacity to accept texts via 9-1-1 began January 2021. 1 9-1-1 Answer Time indicates the average percentage of 9-1-1 calls answered by the State Ringtime Standard. Beginning 03/01/23, the State Ringtime Standard is 90% within 15 seconds, and 95% within 20 seconds. 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/23/25 N/A = Not Available

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030
(74.21) TO THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE

DESIGNATING OAKLAND ROAD A STOP STREET AT

KIOWA DRIVE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa approve a resolution adding Subsection 12.28.030 (74.21) to the La Mesa Municipal code, designating Oakland Road as a stop street at Kiowa Drive to read as follows:
“(74.21) OAKLAND ROAD AT KIOWA DRIVE: All vehicles must make a full and complete stop before entering Kiowa Drive from Oakland Road.” Recommendation:

Adopt the attached resolution amending Subsection 12.28.030 (74.21) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, designating Oakland Road as a stop street at Kiowa Drive to read as follows:
“(74.21) OAKLAND ROAD AT KIOWA DRIVE: All vehicles must make a full and complete stop before entering Kiowa Drive from Oakland Road.” Fiscal Impact:

Funds for the installation of the one-way stop are budgeted and available in the Public Works Operations account 3107-6420.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.  Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 2 of 2
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

The City received a request to investigate the intersection of Kiowa Drive and Oakland Road for the installation of stop signs. Stop signs are recommended for installation based on the preparation of industry standard accepted best practice warrant analysis using a numerical point ranking system by a traffic engineer. Traffic data was collected for the intersection and an analysis conducted. Data collected include collision history, vehicle counts, pedestrian counts, site distance and other factors..

DISCUSSION:

The analysis recommended that the intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road meets all the criteria for installation of a full stop from the westbound approach of Oakland Road to facilitate safe turning maneuvers. Therefore, it is recommended to install a stop sign on the westbound approach of Oakland Road at the intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopting the attached resolution amending Subsection 12.28.030 (74.21) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, designating Oakland Road as a stop street at Kiowa Drive to read as follows:

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Brianda De La Torre
Assistant Engineer
Attachments: A – Resolution – Adding Subsection 12.28.030 (74.21) B – Exhibit – One Way Stop
C - Stop Warrant Study

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA ADDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030(74.21) TO THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE,

DESIGNATING OAKLAND ROAD A STOP STREET AT KIOWA DRIVE
WHEREAS, a stop control warrant study (Kimley-Horn November 3, 2025) of the intersection of Kiowa Drive and Oakland road concluded that stop control on the Oakland Road westbound approach is warranted due to site distance visibility at the intersection; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa may designate minor street stop control at intersections proving to be warranted by traffic control measures.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that
Subsection 12.28.030 (74.21) of the La Mesa Municipal code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“OAKLAND ROAD AT KIOWA DRIVE: All vehicles must make a full and complete stop before entering Kiowa Drive from Oakland Road.” PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Feet 0 20 40 Page 217 of 309
kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 November 3, 2025
Michael Kinnard, PE, PTOE
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa CA 91942
RE: All-Way and Minor Street Stop Control Analysis at Kiowa Drive and Oakland Road Dear Mr. Kinnard,
In accordance with your request, Kimley-Horn and Associates has prepared comprehensive multi-way and minor street stop control analyses for the intersection of Kiowa Drive (N-S) at Oakland Road (EW), a three-legged intersection with the westbound, northbound and southbound approaches free. The posted speed limit is 25 mph on Kiowa Drive. These analyses were prepared using intersection vehicle volumes collected during the school year by Veracity Traffic Group on Thursday, September 11, 2025, over 24-hours. Vehicular speeds on Kiowa Drive were obtained with the traffic segment counts along the south leg of Kiowa Drive. Based on the data, the 85th percentile speed was calculated to be 27 mph overall. A site visit was conducted on Monday, June 30, 2025. Existing intersection counts and the Kiowa Drive speed data are included as attachments.

All-Way Stop Control Analysis
Per direction from the City of La Mesa, all components outlined in the Department of Public Works Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop (April 8, 2003) were addressed when performing this all-way stop analysis. The City of La Mesa Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop control lists five cases that must be considered within an engineering study. Generally, all-way stops are installed where traffic signals are warranted and/or collision history has been indicated by reported collisions of a type susceptible to correction by an all-way stop. Points are assigned to each warrant. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum of 45 points. A summary of each warrant is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road intersection analysis, when applicable.

CASE 1: CALTRANS CRITERIA
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the point system is not applicable if Caltrans’ Traffic Manual Criteria is met. Since the Caltrans Traffic Manual reference in the City of La Mesa guidelines is outdated, this section will refer to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Part 2. Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation. Generally, multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. When an intersection meets one or more of the criteria, it should be considered for a multi-way STOP sign installation.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Criteria A: Traffic Signal
Criteria A states that where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

It is Kimley-Horn’s understanding that this intersection has not been identified for a traffic signal installation. This criteria is not met.

Criteria B: Collision Review
Criteria B analyzes the crash history at the intersection. For this criteria, five or more reported crashes must be reported within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop.

Crashes susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop include right- and left-turn collisions and rightangle collisions.

The Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database is typically accessed for collision data. However, the information has recently been unavailable. Therefore, the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database was used, which does not include property-damage-only collisions. According to TIMS collision data, there were no injury or fatal collisions recorded at the subject intersection between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022. Therefore, it is assumed there has been less than five intersection collisions that would be susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop within a 12-month period. This criteria is not met.

Minimum Traffic Volumes
Criteria C
Criteria C analyzes the minimum volumes at the intersection approaches. This criteria has three parts.

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.

According to counts conducted, the average vehicular volume entering the intersection from both approaches of the major street (Kiowa Drive) is 67 vehicles for 8 hours of an average day.

This criteria is not met.

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor–street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

According to counts conducted, the average vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from both approaches of the minor street (Oakland Road) is 34 vehicles for the same 8 hours of an average day. This criteria is not met.

3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Per the traffic speed data collected at the intersection, the 85th percentile approach speed along Kiowa Drive is 27 mph. This criteria is not met.

Criteria D
Criteria D states that where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 can be satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. This criteria is not met.

The intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road does not meet any of the criteria for a multi-way STOP sign installation based on CA-MUTCD guidance. Therefore, Case 1 is not satisfied.

CASE 2: POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on factual data. Points are assigned to each of the warrants below. The total points possible are 100. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum of 45 points. A summary of each condition is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road intersection analysis, when applicable.

0. Bonus Points
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the subject intersection shall receive 10 bonus points if the four conditions below are met.
a) The street to be controlled is within a residence district Based on Section 515 of the California Vehicle Code, Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road is within a residence district.
b) The street to be controlled is classified/functioning as a collector According to the City of La Mesa General Plan, Kiowa Drive is classified as a Local Street. c) The subject intersection is not within 600 feet from the nearest controlled intersection along the collector
Neither Kiowa Drive nor Oakland Ave are classified as a collector. d) There is a parallel arterial highway that can be used as an alternative route Lake Murray Boulevard is classified as an arterial highway, runs parallel to Kiowa Drive, and could be used as an alternative route.

Not all conditions are satisfied. Therefore, no bonus points are received.

POINTS: 0/10

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411

1. Accident Warrant
Five points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an all-way stop control during any 12-month period prior to the investigation date.

The Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database is typically accessed for collision data. However, the information has recently been unavailable. Therefore, the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database was used, which does not include property-damage-only collisions.

According to TIMS collision data, there were no injury or fatal collisions recorded at the subject intersection between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022. Therefore, it is assumed there has been less than five intersection collisions that would be susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop within a 12-month period. The TIMS Collision Map is included as an attachment.

POINTS: 0/25

2. Unusual Condition Warrant
Where unusual conditions exist, points are assigned on the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. The 45-point minimum requirement may be waived and an all-way stop may be installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a documented problem.

All-way stops may be justified based on projected volumes and accident frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within a specified period of times.

Unusual Conditions:

A. Adjacent school, fire station, playground, senior center and/or amusement park 3/7 Points – The intersection is within approximately 350’ of Maryland Avenue Elementary School, which includes a playground.

B. Any visibility obstructions which result in limited stopping sight distance based on either the posted speed limit or the 85% ile speed
4/7 Points – There are visibility obstructions due to parked vehicles that result in limited sight distance at the intersection based on 85th percentile speeds of 27 mph and 185 foot stopping sight distance requirement (downgrade for vehicles traveling southbound at a grade of just less than 6%) and 164 foot stopping sight distance requirement (for vehicles traveling northbound conservatively assuming no grade change):
• Westbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling southbound ~ 125/185 feet (68%) • Westbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling northbound ~ 100/164 feet (61%) Sight Distance Photos are included as an attachment.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 C. An intersection leading to an arterial from an interior (circular) collector. 0/2 Points – Neither street is identified as an arterial per the City of La Mesa’s 2012 General Plan.

D. Intersection with steep grades within 500 feet from the intersection on the downhill approach 0/7 Points – There is no grade that is greater than six percent in the vicinity of the intersection.

E. Intersection is on “Suggested Route To School” and no other controlled crossing is located within 600’
0/7 Points – The intersection was not noted on any publicly available “Suggested Routes to School Plan”. The controlled crossing of Kiowa Dr and Lake Murray Blvd is approximately 550’ from the target intersection, so this does not apply.

F. High Approach Speeds
1/7 Points – Per the traffic speed data collected at the intersection, the 85th percentile speed is 27 mph, just 2 mph above the 25 mph assumed speed limit. Speed data is included as an attachment.

G. Curbside Facilities/Services
0/7 Points – There are no school bus stops, public mailboxes or transit stops adjacent to the intersection.

POINTS: 8/21

3. Pedestrian Volume Warrant
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the busiest hour of an average day.

Counts were conducted while school was in session. 14 pedestrians crossed the major street during the peak pedestrian hour, which occurred between 7:30 and 8:30 AM.

POINTS: 8/20

4. Traffic Volume Warrant
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the eight busiest hours of an average day. A summary of count information with associated points included in Attachment A.

In residence districts, if the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 35 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants 70% of the above requirements. The 85th percentile approach speed along Kiowa Drive is 27 mph, so this reduction does not apply.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 The maximum total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 135 vehicles during one hour of an average day and the maximum total minor street volume is 38 vehicles. The 85th percentile approach speed along the major street (Kiowa Drive) is 27 mph. This criteria is not met.

POINTS: 0/24

5. Traffic Volume Difference Warrant
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach traffic volumes are nearly equal.

For T-intersections, the percent is the ratio of the minor street approach volume to the highest single leg approach volume on the major street multiplied by one hundred. 388 (24-Hour Minor St Approach Volume) = 83%
467 (24-Hour Major St Approach Volume)
POINTS: 8/10
TOTAL POINTS: 24/100
FINAL RECOMMENDATION – ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
After performing all cases listed in the City of La Mesa’s Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop, it is not currently recommended to install an all-way stop at the intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road. The all-way stop analysis above resulted in a total score of 24 points, where the minimum required to justify an all-way stop is 45 points (out of 100 possible points).

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Minor Street Stop Control Analysis
Per direction from the City of La Mesa, Kimley-Horn reviewed Sections 2B.04 through 2B.06 of the California Manual of Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to perform this minor-street stop control analysis.

Section 2B.06 of the MUTCD, Stop Sign Applications, lists three conditions that must be considered within an engineering study. Generally, minor street stop control is installed where there are high traffic volumes on the major roadway, restricted sight distance, and/or collision history has been indicated by reported collisions of a type susceptible to correction by a stop sign. A summary of each condition is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road intersection analysis, when applicable.

Per Section 2B.06 of the MUTCD, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures, such as YIELD signs, at intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times. This will be evaluated as part of the three conditions below.

CONDITION A: TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Condition A requires the vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway to exceed 6,000 vehicles per day.

The vehicular traffic volume on the through street, Kiowa Drive, is approximately 820 vehicles per day. This criteria is not met.

CONDITION B: RESTRICTED VIEW
Condition B requires a restricted view to exist that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway.

As reviewed above as part of the All-Way Stop Analysis, there are visibility obstructions due to parked vehicles that result in limited sight distance at the intersection based on 85th percentile speeds of 27 mph and 185 foot stopping sight distance requirement (downgrade for vehicles traveling southbound at a grade of just less than 6%) and 164 foot stopping sight distance requirement (for vehicles traveling northbound conservatively assuming no grade change):
• Westbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling southbound ~ 125/185 feet (68%) • Westbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling northbound ~ 100/164 feet (61%) Sight Distance Photos are included as an attachment. In order to observe conflicting traffic on the through street, drivers must come to a full stop to facilitate safe turning maneuvers from the westbound approach, meaning less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs do not first need to be considered. Therefore, this criteria is met.

CONDITION C: COLLISION REVIEW
Condition C requires that crash records indicate three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway.

The Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database is typically accessed for collision data. However, the information has recently been unavailable. Therefore, the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database was used, which does not include property-damage-only collisions. As reviewed above as part of the All-Way Stop Analysis, according to TIMS collision data, there were no injury or fatal collisions recorded at the subject intersection between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2022. Therefore, it is assumed there has been less than five intersection collisions that would be susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop within a 12-month period. This criteria is not met.

FINAL RECOMMENDATION – MINOR STREET STOP CONTROL
The intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road meets the criteria related to restricted sight distance for the use of a STOP sign on the minor-street approach based on CA-MUTCD guidance. The CAMUTCD states that consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures, such as YIELD signs, at intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times. However, the limited sight distance results in a condition requiring a full stop to facilitate safe turning maneuvers from the westbound approach. Therefore, it is currently recommended to install minor street stop control on the westbound approach of Oakland Road at the intersection of Kiowa Drive at Oakland Road.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Zachary McFann, P.E., T.E.

P.E. No. 90466
T.E. No. 3064

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachments:
• Attachment A – Existing Traffic Count Data
• Attachment B – Speed Data
• Attachment C – Intersection Sight Distance Photos
• Attachment D – TIMS Collision Map

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment A – Existing Traffic Count Data

11/3/2025 Count Summary
Hour Ending At: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NB 0 1 1 0 1 6 10 57 43 20 20 29 17 32 66 34 26 33 34 18 10 4 3 2 SB 1 2 3 2 1 8 13 33 22 15 18 17 20 19 31 27 17 29 23 16 11 11 10 4 Kiowa Subtotal 1 3 4 2 2 14 23 90 65 35 38 46 37 51 97 61 43 62 57 34 21 15 13 6 EB
WB 2 0 0 0 3 3 6 38 36 22 18 12 19 31 38 27 38 27 25 17 10 9 6 1 Peds/Bikes 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 7 2 4 0 3 2 0 2 6 3 11 3 2 0 0 0 Oakland Subtotal 2 0 0 0 3 3 6 38 36 22 18 12 19 31 38 27 38 27 25 17 10 9 6 1 Oakland Subtotal (w/ Peds/Bikes) 2 0 0 0 3 3 9 51 43 24 22 12 22 33 38 29 44 30 36 20 12 9 6 1 Total Vehicles 3 3 4 2 5 17 29 128 101 57 56 58 56 82 135 88 81 89 82 51 31 24 19 7 Points 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Points (70%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
0 1 0 N
0 26
9 #
PEAK HR 24-HRS 24-HR PEAK HR

VOLUME TOTAL TOTAL VOLUME
0 0 166 17 0
0 0 0 0 1
0 222 37 0
0 1 0
1200AM -
-
-

PEAK HOUR
TMC SUMMARY OF Kiowa Dr & Oakland Rd

THURSDAY
Day
Project #: 25-1469-001
0 Kiowa Dr
Oakland Rd

CONTROL
No Controls
VOLUME
LOCATION #:

Kiowa Dr & Oakland Rd
25-1469-001
130

APPROACH LANES
24-HR
0 APPROACH LANES

PEAK HR
APPROACH LANES 269 84
0 TOTAL VOLUME
09/11/25
730 AM
1200AM
Date
Oakland Rd

APPROACH LANES
0 337
0 5418
(Intersection Name)

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
24-HR
Kiowa Dr
0 TOTAL
0 PEAK HR

COUNT PERIODS

Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:

N-S STREET: Kiowa Dr DATE: 09/11/25 LOCATION: La Mesa
E-W STREET: Oakland Rd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
4:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
5:00 AM 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5
5:15 AM 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
5:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:45 AM 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
6:00 AM 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
6:15 AM 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8
6:30 AM 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
6:45 AM 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 8
7:00 AM 0 3 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12
7:15 AM 0 6 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 21
7:30 AM 0 7 6 3 7 0 0 0 0 19 0 2 44
7:45 AM 0 25 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 51
8:00 AM 0 6 4 2 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 27
8:15 AM 0 16 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 39
8:30 AM 0 4 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 16
8:45 AM 0 6 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 19
9:00 AM 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 15
9:15 AM 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 16
9:30 AM 0 2 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12
9:45 AM 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 14
10:00 AM 0 5 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 14
10:15 AM 0 5 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 14
10:30 AM 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 12
10:45 AM 0 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 16
11:00 AM 0 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 13
11:15 AM 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 11
11:30 AM 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 15
11:45 AM 0 9 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 19
12:00 PM 0 3 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 13
12:15 PM 0 6 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 16
12:30 PM 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12
12:45 PM 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 15
1:00 PM 0 5 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 18
1:15 PM 0 5 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 16
1:30 PM 0 6 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 21
1:45 PM 0 4 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 11 0 3 27
2:00 PM 0 5 2 4 11 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 31
2:15 PM 0 35 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 11 0 6 65
2:30 PM 0 3 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 17
2:45 PM 0 8 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 22
3:00 PM 0 1 3 3 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 23
3:15 PM 0 6 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 17
3:30 PM 0 10 4 6 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 29
3:45 PM 0 4 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 19
4:00 PM 0 8 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 20
4:15 PM 0 3 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 18
4:30 PM 0 6 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 26
4:45 PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 17
5:00 PM 0 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 16
5:15 PM 0 5 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 21
5:30 PM 0 11 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 30
5:45 PM 0 5 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 22
6:00 PM 0 8 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 24
6:15 PM 0 6 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 17
6:30 PM 0 3 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 19
6:45 PM 0 6 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 22
7:00 PM 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 14
7:15 PM 0 5 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 15
7:30 PM 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11
7:45 PM 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 11
8:00 PM 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10
8:15 PM 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 9
8:30 PM 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6
8:45 PM 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6
9:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6
9:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
9:30 PM 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
9:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 6
10:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3
10:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7
10:30 PM 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
10:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4
11:00 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
11:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
11:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
11:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
Volumes 0 337 130 84 269 0 0 0 0 222 0 166 1208
Approach % 0.00 72.16 27.84 23.80 76.20 0.00 #### #### #### 57.22 0.00 42.78 App/Depart 467 / 503 353 / 491 0 / 214 388 / 0
730 AM
PEAK
Volumes 0 54 18 9 26 0 0 0 0 37 0 17 161
Approach % 0.00 75.00 25.00 25.71 74.29 0.00 #### #### #### 68.52 0.00 31.48 PEAK HR.

FACTOR: 0.789

32.777761, -117.040561
No Controls
COMMENT 1:

GPS:

CONTROL:
25-1469-001
Peak Hr Begins at:

0.643

WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.643 0.795 0.000
veracity group traffic

N-S STREET: Kiowa Dr DATE: 09/11/25 LOCATION:

E-W STREET: Oakland Rd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 25-1469-001

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
7:00 AM 0 3 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12
7:15 AM 0 6 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 21
7:30 AM 0 7 6 3 7 0 0 0 0 19 0 2 44
7:45 AM 0 25 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 51
8:00 AM 0 6 4 2 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 27
8:15 AM 0 16 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 39
8:30 AM 0 4 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 16
8:45 AM 0 6 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 19
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM

TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
Volumes 0 73 27 12 43 0 0 0 0 47 0 27 229
Approach % 0.00 73.00 27.00 21.82 78.18 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 63.51 0.00 36.49 App/Depart 100 / 100 55 / 90 0 / 39 74 / 0
AM Peak Hour: 730 AM
PEAK
Volumes 0 54 18 9 26 0 0 0 0 37 0 17 161
Approach % 0.00 75.00 25.00 25.71 74.29 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 68.52 0.00 31.48 PEAK HR.

FACTOR: 0.789
La Mesa

0.643 0.795 0.000 0.643

AM PEAK HOUR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

N-S STREET: Kiowa Dr DATE: 09/11/25 LOCATION:

E-W STREET: Oakland Rd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 25-1469-001

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM 0 8 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 20
4:15 PM 0 3 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 18
4:30 PM 0 6 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 26
4:45 PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 17
5:00 PM 0 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 16
5:15 PM 0 5 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 21
5:30 PM 0 11 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 30
5:45 PM 0 5 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 22
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM

TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
Volumes 0 44 15 8 38 0 0 0 0 36 0 29 170
Approach % 0.00 74.58 25.42 17.39 82.61 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 55.38 0.00 44.62 App/Depart 59 / 73 46 / 74 0 / 23 65 / 0
PM Peak Hour: 500 PM
PEAK
Volumes 0 26 7 3 26 0 0 0 0 12 0 15 89
Approach % 0.00 78.79 21.21 10.34 89.66 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 44.44 0.00 55.56 PEAK HR.

FACTOR: 0.635 0.806 0.000 0.750 0.742
La Mesa

PM PEAK HOUR

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

N-S STREET: Kiowa Dr Date: 09/11/25 City: La Mesa
E-W STREET: Oakland Rd Day: THURSDAY Project #: 25-1469-001

N-LEG S-LEG E-LEG W-LEG N-LEG S-LEG E-LEG W-LEG
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0
12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 12:15 AM 0 0 0 0
12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 12:30 AM 0 0 0 0
12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 12:45 AM 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0
1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0
1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0
1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1:45 AM 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0
2:15 AM 0 0 0 1 2:15 AM 0 0 0 0
2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0
2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0
3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0
3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0
3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 3:45 AM 0 0 0 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0
4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0
4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0
4:45 AM 0 0 0 1 4:45 AM 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 0
5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 0 0 0 0
5:30 AM 0 0 0 0 5:30 AM 0 0 0 0
5:45 AM 0 0 0 0 5:45 AM 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM 0 1 0 2 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0
6:15 AM 0 2 2 0 6:15 AM 0 0 0 0
6:30 AM 0 0 0 1 6:30 AM 0 0 0 0
6:45 AM 0 0 0 1 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 1 0 3 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 5 0 9 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 3 2 3 11 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 6 3 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 4 0 4 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 2 2 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 3 0 0 1 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0
9:00 AM 0 0 2 2 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0
9:15 AM 0 2 0 2 9:15 AM 0 0 0 0
9:30 AM 0 0 1 0 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0
9:45 AM 0 0 0 1 9:45 AM 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 1 10:00 AM 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 1 0 1 10:15 AM 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 1 0 0 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 2 0 0 0 10:45 AM 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 0 0 2 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 0 2 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 2 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 1 0 2 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 2 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 3 0 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 1 0 1 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 1 0 3 1 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 1 2 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 0 0 0 9 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 0 1 1 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 4 3 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 1 0 1 3:15 PM 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 1 0 1 0 3:30 PM 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 3 0 3 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 1 0 1 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 1 1 3 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 1 3 3 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 1 4 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 1 0 2 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 1 1 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 1 3 1 1 6:00 PM 0 0 2 0
6:15 PM 0 0 0 6 6:15 PM 0 0 0 1
6:30 PM 4 1 1 3 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0
6:45 PM 2 0 1 4 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 1 0 2 1 7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:15 PM 0 1 1 4 7:15 PM 0 0 0 0
7:30 PM 1 0 0 1 7:30 PM 0 0 0 0
7:45 PM 0 0 0 0 7:45 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 2 0 2 8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:15 PM 0 0 0 1 8:15 PM 0 0 0 0
8:30 PM 0 0 0 0 8:30 PM 0 0 0 0
8:45 PM 0 0 0 0 8:45 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 1 9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:15 PM 0 0 0 0 9:15 PM 0 0 0 0
9:30 PM 0 0 0 0 9:30 PM 0 0 0 0
9:45 PM 0 0 0 0 9:45 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
10:15 PM 0 0 0 0 10:15 PM 0 0 0 0
10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0
10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 0 0 0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0
11:15 PM 0 0 0 0 11:15 PM 0 0 0 0
11:30 PM 0 0 0 0 11:30 PM 0 0 0 0
11:45 PM 0 0 0 0 11:45 PM 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 22 39 42 117 TOTAL 0 0 2 1
Pedestrian & Bicycle Study

PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES
veracity group traffic

City: La Mesa Project #:

Location: Kiowa Dr north of Oakland Rd
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 1 0 12:00 4 5
00:15 0 1 12:15 9 4
00:30 0 0 12:30 3 8
00:45 0 1 0 1 2 12:45 7 23 3 20 43
01:00 0 1 13:00 9 4
01:15 0 0 13:15 6 4
01:30 0 0 13:30 7 6
01:45 0 0 1 2 2 13:45 7 29 5 19 48
02:00 0 1 14:00 7 15
02:15 0 1 14:15 41 5
02:30 0 0 14:30 8 6
02:45 0 0 1 3 3 14:45 11 67 5 31 98
03:00 0 1 15:00 5 8
03:15 0 0 15:15 8 5
03:30 0 0 15:30 12 10
03:45 0 0 1 2 2 15:45 7 32 4 27 59
04:00 0 0 16:00 11 5
04:15 0 0 16:15 5 5
04:30 0 0 16:30 12 4
04:45 1 1 1 1 2 16:45 4 32 3 17 49
05:00 0 2 17:00 8 5
05:15 3 2 17:15 10 7
05:30 0 3 17:30 15 8
05:45 2 5 1 8 13 17:45 8 41 9 29 70
06:00 1 0 18:00 10 5
06:15 1 6 18:15 8 4
06:30 2 4 18:30 6 7
06:45 2 6 3 13 19 18:45 10 34 7 23 57
07:00 3 4 19:00 9 4
07:15 8 8 19:15 6 4
07:30 9 10 19:30 5 6
07:45 28 48 11 33 81 19:45 6 26 2 16 42
08:00 12 9 20:00 2 5
08:15 22 5 20:15 3 4
08:30 8 3 20:30 3 1
08:45 10 52 5 22 74 20:45 3 11 1 11 22
09:00 8 2 21:00 2 2
09:15 7 1 21:15 2 2
09:30 2 7 21:30 2 5
09:45 4 21 5 15 36 21:45 3 9 2 11 20
10:00 8 5 22:00 3 0
10:15 6 4 22:15 1 6
10:30 5 3 22:30 1 3
10:45 6 25 6 18 43 22:45 2 7 1 10 17
11:00 6 4 23:00 0 2
11:15 6 3 23:15 1 1
11:30 9 5 23:30 0 1
11:45 11 32 5 17 49 23:45 0 1 0 4 5
Total Vol. 191 135 326 312 218 530
GPS: NB SB EB WB Combined
503 353 856
Split % 58.6% 41.4% 38.1% 58.9% 41.1% 61.9%
Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 14:00 13:30 14:00
Volume 71 38 106 67 31 98
P.H.F. 0.63 0.86 0.68 0.41 0.52 0.53
Daily Totals
AM PM

32.777761, -117.040561
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745 Volumes for: Thursday, September 11, 2025 25-1469-002

City: La Mesa Project #:

Location: Kiowa Dr south of Oakland Rd
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 12:00 5 7
00:15 0 1 12:15 7 6
00:30 0 1 12:30 1 5
00:45 0 0 0 2 2 12:45 4 17 7 25 42
01:00 0 0 13:00 8 5
01:15 0 0 13:15 8 6
01:30 1 0 13:30 8 10
01:45 0 1 1 1 2 13:45 8 32 16 37 69
02:00 0 1 14:00 7 18
02:15 1 0 14:15 43 16
02:30 0 0 14:30 4 6
02:45 0 1 1 2 3 14:45 12 66 6 46 112
03:00 0 1 15:00 4 12
03:15 0 0 15:15 9 5
03:30 0 0 15:30 14 7
03:45 0 0 0 1 1 15:45 7 34 9 33 67
04:00 0 0 16:00 10 6
04:15 0 1 16:15 6 9
04:30 0 1 16:30 9 10
04:45 1 1 2 4 5 16:45 1 26 11 36 62
05:00 1 4 17:00 7 5
05:15 3 2 17:15 5 10
05:30 0 3 17:30 13 12
05:45 2 6 1 10 16 17:45 8 33 11 38 71
06:00 4 0 18:00 13 8
06:15 0 5 18:15 8 7
06:30 4 5 18:30 5 8
06:45 2 10 5 15 25 18:45 8 34 9 32 66
07:00 6 5 19:00 4 3
07:15 10 8 19:15 7 6
07:30 13 26 19:30 4 5
07:45 28 57 16 55 112 19:45 3 18 4 18 36
08:00 10 9 20:00 2 6
08:15 21 12 20:15 2 4
08:30 6 6 20:30 4 2
08:45 6 43 8 35 78 20:45 2 10 2 14 24
09:00 6 4 21:00 0 3
09:15 7 6 21:15 2 3
09:30 4 5 21:30 2 2
09:45 3 20 5 20 40 21:45 0 4 2 10 14
10:00 5 5 22:00 1 0
10:15 6 7 22:15 0 3
10:30 6 6 22:30 1 2
10:45 3 20 8 26 46 22:45 1 3 2 7 10
11:00 6 5 23:00 1 0
11:15 6 4 23:15 1 2
11:30 7 6 23:30 0 1
11:45 10 29 6 21 50 23:45 0 2 0 3 5
Total Vol. 188 192 380 279 299 578
GPS: NB SB EB WB Combined
467 491 958
Split % 49.5% 50.5% 39.7% 48.3% 51.7% 60.3%
Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 13:30 13:30 13:30
Volume 72 63 135 66 60 126
P.H.F. 0.64 0.61 0.77 0.38 0.83 0.53
Daily Totals
AM PM

32.777761, -117.040561
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745 Volumes for: Thursday, September 11, 2025 25-1469-002

City: La Mesa Project #:

Location: Oakland Dr east of Kiowa Dr
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 1 12:00 2 3
00:15 0 0 12:15 1 5
00:30 0 1 12:30 4 3
00:45 0 0 0 2 2 12:45 1 8 8 19 27
01:00 1 0 13:00 4 6
01:15 0 0 13:15 4 4
01:30 1 0 13:30 4 7
01:45 0 2 0 0 2 13:45 4 16 14 31 47
02:00 0 0 14:00 6 9
02:15 2 0 14:15 8 17
02:30 0 0 14:30 3 7
02:45 0 2 0 0 2 14:45 5 22 5 38 60
03:00 0 0 15:00 6 11
03:15 0 0 15:15 4 3
03:30 0 0 15:30 10 5
03:45 1 1 0 0 1 15:45 3 23 8 27 50
04:00 0 0 16:00 3 5
04:15 0 1 16:15 4 7
04:30 0 1 16:30 4 13
04:45 0 0 1 3 3 16:45 2 13 13 38 51
05:00 1 2 17:00 3 4
05:15 0 0 17:15 1 9
05:30 0 0 17:30 3 9
05:45 1 2 1 3 5 17:45 3 10 5 27 37
06:00 3 0 18:00 6 6
06:15 2 2 18:15 2 5
06:30 2 1 18:30 5 7
06:45 1 8 3 6 14 18:45 3 16 7 25 41
07:00 4 2 19:00 2 6
07:15 5 3 19:15 3 4
07:30 9 21 19:30 1 1
07:45 7 25 12 38 63 19:45 1 7 6 17 24
08:00 6 8 20:00 2 3
08:15 5 13 20:15 2 3
08:30 2 7 20:30 1 1
08:45 1 14 8 36 50 20:45 1 6 3 10 16
09:00 3 7 21:00 1 4
09:15 3 8 21:15 0 1
09:30 5 1 21:30 3 0
09:45 5 16 6 22 38 21:45 1 5 4 9 14
10:00 1 4 22:00 0 2
10:15 1 4 22:15 3 1
10:30 1 3 22:30 2 1
10:45 2 5 7 18 23 22:45 0 5 2 6 11
11:00 2 3 23:00 3 0
11:15 1 2 23:15 0 1
11:30 0 3 23:30 0 0
11:45 2 5 4 12 17 23:45 0 3 0 1 4
Total Vol. 80 140 220 134 248 382
GPS: NB SB EB WB Combined
214 388 602
Split % 36.4% 63.6% 36.5% 35.1% 64.9% 63.5%
Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:30 14:45 13:30 13:30
Volume 27 54 81 25 47 69
P.H.F. 0.75 0.64 0.68 0.63 0.69 0.69
Daily Totals
AM PM

32.777761, -117.040561
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745 Volumes for: Thursday, September 11, 2025 25-1469-002

City: La Mesa Project #:

Location: Kiowa Dr & Oakland Rd
AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 0 1 12:00 5 5 0 3
00:15 0 1 0 0 12:15 7 4 0 5
00:30 0 0 0 1 12:30 1 8 0 3
00:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 12:45 4 17 3 20 0 0 8 19 56
01:00 0 1 0 0 13:00 8 4 0 6
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 8 4 0 4
01:30 1 0 0 0 13:30 8 6 0 7
01:45 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 13:45 8 32 5 19 0 0 14 31 82
02:00 0 1 0 0 14:00 7 15 0 9
02:15 1 1 0 0 14:15 43 5 0 17
02:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 4 6 0 7
02:45 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 14:45 12 66 5 31 0 0 5 38 135
03:00 0 1 0 0 15:00 4 8 0 11
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 9 5 0 3
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 14 10 0 5
03:45 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:45 7 34 4 27 0 0 8 27 88
04:00 0 0 0 0 16:00 10 5 0 5
04:15 0 0 0 1 16:15 6 5 0 7
04:30 0 0 0 1 16:30 9 4 0 13
04:45 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 5 16:45 1 26 3 17 0 0 13 38 81
05:00 1 2 0 2 17:00 7 5 0 4
05:15 3 2 0 0 17:15 5 7 0 9
05:30 0 3 0 0 17:30 13 8 0 9
05:45 2 6 1 8 0 0 1 3 17 17:45 8 33 9 29 0 0 5 27 89
06:00 4 0 0 0 18:00 13 5 0 6
06:15 0 6 0 2 18:15 8 4 0 5
06:30 4 4 0 1 18:30 5 7 0 7
06:45 2 10 3 13 0 0 3 6 29 18:45 8 34 7 23 0 0 7 25 82
07:00 6 4 0 2 19:00 4 4 0 6
07:15 10 8 0 3 19:15 7 4 0 4
07:30 13 10 0 21 19:30 4 6 0 1
07:45 28 57 11 33 0 0 12 38 128 19:45 3 18 2 16 0 0 6 17 51 08:00 10 9 0 8 20:00 2 5 0 3
08:15 21 5 0 13 20:15 2 4 0 3
08:30 6 3 0 7 20:30 4 1 0 1
08:45 6 43 5 22 0 0 8 36 101 20:45 2 10 1 11 0 0 3 10 31 09:00 6 2 0 7 21:00 0 2 0 4
09:15 7 1 0 8 21:15 2 2 0 1
09:30 4 7 0 1 21:30 2 5 0 0
09:45 3 20 5 15 0 0 6 22 57 21:45 0 4 2 11 0 0 4 9 24
10:00 5 5 0 4 22:00 1 0 0 2
10:15 6 4 0 4 22:15 0 6 0 1
10:30 6 3 0 3 22:30 1 3 0 1
10:45 3 20 6 18 0 0 7 18 56 22:45 1 3 1 10 0 0 2 6 19
11:00 6 4 0 3 23:00 1 2 0 0
11:15 6 3 0 2 23:15 1 1 0 1
11:30 7 5 0 3 23:30 0 1 0 0
11:45 10 29 5 17 0 0 4 12 58 23:45 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 7
Total Vol. 188 135 140 463 279 218 248 745
GPS: NB SB EB WB Combined
467 353 388 1208
Split % 40.6% 29.2% 30.2% 38.3% 37.4% 29.3% 33.3% 61.7% Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 07:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 13:30 Volume 72 38 54 161 66 31 47 144
P.H.F. 0.64 0.86 0.64 0.79 0.38 0.52 0.69 0.55
Daily Totals
AM PM

32.777761, -117.040561
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona/Veracity Traffic Group (520) 316-6745 Volumes for: Thursday, September 11, 2025 25-1469-002

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment B – Speed Data

STREET: STREET CLASS.: DIR(S):

LIMITS: ROAD COND: GOOD OBSERVER: Aaron Barry
WEATHER: DRY DATE:

CNRA: COLLISION RATE: #DIV/0! (Acc/MVM) TIME:

EXPECTED COLLSION RATE: 0.902 (Acc/MVM) POSTED SL: 25
50th Percentile Speed 24.0 10 MPH Pace Speed 19 to 28
85th Percentile Speed 27.0 Percent in Pace Speed 84
Number of Vehicles Observed 100 Percent over Pace Speed 9 Average Speed 24 Percent under Pace Speed 7
Range of Speeds 14 to 32
Speed No. Pct. Cum. Pct.
(MPH) (cars) (%) (%)
10 0 0 0
11 0 0 0
12 0 0 0
13 0 0 0
14 1 1 1
15 1 1 2
16 0 0 2
17 3 3 5
18 2 2 7
19 5 5 12
20 3 3 15
21 6 6 21
22 8 8 29
23 9 9 38
24 12 12 50
25 15 15 65
26 11 11 76
27 9 9 85
28 6 6 91
29 4 4 95
30 3 3 98
31 1 1 99
32 1 1 100
33 0 0 100
34 0 0 100
35 0 0 100
36 0 0 100
37 0 0 100
38 0 0 100
39 0 0 100
40 0 0 100
41 0 0 100
42 0 0 100
43 0 0 100
44 0 0 100
45 0 0 100
46 0 0 100
47 0 0 100
48 0 0 100
49 0 0 100
50 0 0 100
51 0 0 100
52 0 0 100
53 0 0 100
54 0 0 100
55 0 0 100

VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY SHEET
NONE 12:00-12:59
9/11/2025
Field Data Services of Arizona Speed Study

KIOWA DR FEDERAL AID SYSTEM MAP

JUST SOUTH OF OAKLAND RD
NB/SB
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
105
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

CUMULATIVE SPEED CURVE
85th Percentile Speed
50th Percentile Speed
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Cum. Pct.

Speed (mph)
No. of Vehicles
Speed (mph)

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment C – Intersection Sight Distance Photos

Oakland Road (Westbound) – Looking Right (North at Southbound traffic approaching intersection)

Oakland Road (Westbound) – Looking Left (South at Northbound traffic approaching intersection)

Kiowa Drive (Northbound) – Looking Right (East at Westbound traffic approaching intersection)

Kiowa Drive (Southbound) – Looking Left (East at Westbound traffic approaching intersection)

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment D – TIMS Collision Map

Lake
Murray
Blvd
Murray
Blvd
Kiowa Dr
aryland Ave
Oakland Rd
Melody Ln
Kiowa
Dr
McRae Ave
Macquarie St
Maryland
Avenue
Elementary
TIMS Data Referencing SWITRS (PDO not Included) 01/01/2018 - 12/31/2022 Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
SWITRS
Crashes
7/1/2025
0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi
0 0.03 0.06 0.11 km
1:2,497
TIMS (https://tims.berkeley.edu), SafeTREC, UC Berkeley Copyright © 2025 UC Regents; all rights reserved.

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE

AGREEMENT WITH MOBILE MODULAR

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE

AND DELIVERY OF A MOBILE MODULAR OFFICE

SPACE FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS
YARD
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council adopt a resolution to authorize a purchase agreement with Mobile Modular Management Corporation for the purchase and delivery of a mobile modular office space at the Public Works Operations Yard, Capital Improvement Project 8612?
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a purchase agreement with Mobile Modular Management Corporation for the purchase and delivery of a mobile modular office space at the Public Works Operations Yard, Capital Improvement Project 8612.

Fiscal Impact:

The quoted cost for the purchase and delivery of the mobile modular office is $198,189.74, and funds are budgeted and available in Capital Improvement Project No. 8612.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
BACKGROUND:

In January 2024, severe winter storms struck, bringing intense rainfall to the City. These winter storms caused widespread flooding, mudslides, and debris flows, threatening life and safety, as well as structures and other critical infrastructure. The impacts from these winter storms also caused evacuations, road and school closures, and widespread damage to public and private property.

The 1990s era traffic safety modular building located at the Public Works Corporation Yard was deemed unsafe for occupancy after those storms and demolished. This building was previously used as a lab by the Helix Water District back when the District was located on the Civic Center property. The building was relocated to the Public Works Operations Yard to allow for the construction of the new police station.

In addition to supporting the traffic safety division, there is a need to provide office space for a portion of the Public Works engineering division at the Operations Yard since there is no room for additional staff at City Hall. The location of the previous traffic safety modular building was identified as the site for the new engineering building.

DISCUSSION:

In accordance with the La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.190, Cooperative Purchasing is exempt from competitive purchasing procedures. The Purchasing Officer may join with other public jurisdictions in cooperative purchasing plans, programs, or pricing agreements. Modular Management Corporation has provided a quote from Sourcewell ID# 120822, a cooperative purchasing program.

City staff worked with Mobile Modular Management Corporation to identify a suitable modular building to fit the department's needs. The selected building is a refurbished modular building measuring 36 feet by 40 feet. It contains four offices, a cubicle area with six workstations, a conference room with a table and chairs for ten people, a kitchenette, and two bathrooms. Mobile Modular will deliver and install the building in the location identified in the Operations Yard.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a purchase agreement with Mobile Modular Management Corporation, for the purchase and delivery of a mobile modular office space at the Public Works Operations Yard, Capital Improvement Project 8612.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Mobile Modular Management Quote

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MOBILE MODULAR

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OF A

MOBILE MODULAR OFFICE SPACE FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS YARD (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 8612)
WHEREAS, due to severe weather in January 2024, the traffic safety modular building located at the Public Works Operations Yard was deemed unsafe for occupancy; WHEREAS, in accordance with the La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.190, Cooperative Purchasing, the Purchasing Officer may join with other public jurisdictions in cooperative purchasing plans, programs or pricing agreements; WHEREAS, Modular Management Corporation has provided a quote from Sourcewell ID# 120822, a cooperative purchasing program, in the amount of $198,189.74; and WHEREAS, funds are budgeted and available in Capital Improvement Project 8612.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council authorizes a purchase agreement with Mobile Modular Management Corporation for the purchase and delivery of a mobile modular office space at the Public Works Operations Yard, Capital Improvement Project 8612 for $198,189.74.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

220042784, Printed: 11-10-2025 04:01PM Thank you for contacting Mobile Modular.

Mobile Modular Management Corporation a
Division of McGrath RentCorp
11450 Mission Blvd.

Mira Loma, CA 91752
Phone: (951) 360-6600
www.mobilemodular.com
Sale Agreement
Contract: 220042784.1 Date
Printed: 11/10/2025
Buyer Name & Billing Address Site Location Mobile Modular Management Corporation a Division of McGrath RentCorp ("Seller")
City Of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
Carly Cubberley
[email protected]
619 6671153
City Of La Mesa
8152 Commercial Street
La Mesa, CA 91942
Michael Kinnard
[email protected]
619 6671166
Customer PO/Reference:

Pending Exp: //
By:

Questions?
Please Contact: Chris Parker
[email protected]
Direct Phone: (817) 663-8527
All other inquiries: (951) 360-6600
Office, 36x40 HCD (NonStd) 1 $126,724.00 $126,724.00 Y
Non-Standard Configuration. Size excludes 3' towbar.

Ramp, Custom Plan 1 $24,840.00 $24,840.00 Y
Galvanized swithcback ramp, and one access stairs
Qty Charge Each Total One Time Taxable
Charges Upon Delivery:

Office, 36x40 HCD (NonStd)
Additional Labor, On Blvl, Other (PW) 1 $1,980.00 $1,980.00 N Prevailing Wage Cert. Payroll
Rolling and positioning office
Block and Level Building (A7) (PW) 1 $6,355.00 $6,355.00 N Prevailing Wage Cert. Payroll
Delivery Haulage 12 wide 3 $1,691.00 $5,073.00 N
Essential Material Handling Fee 3 $75.00 $225.00 N
Fee, License or Registration for Sale 1 $2,752.50 $2,752.50 N Installation, Ramp Custom Plan (PW)
Prevailing Wage Cert. Payroll
1 $2,840.00 $2,840.00 N
ADA ramp install
Installation, Skirting, Wood (PW) 152 $30.00 $4,560.00 Y Prevailing Wage Cert. Payroll
Install Foundation, CP Seismic Piers(PW) 18 $490.00 $8,820.00 Y Prevailing Wage Cert. Payroll CP
Siesmic pier anchors
$32,605.50
Tax: $14,020.24
Total Sales Price Including Tax: $198,189.74
Special Notes
Clarifications
• The Total Sales Price specified in this Agreement shall be valid for 30 days from the Date Printed, unless otherwise specified in the Special Notes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event this Agreement is signed by Buyer after the applicable expiration date, Seller shall have the option to either accept as set forth below or reject the Agreement in writing. Seller may accept the Agreement by: (1) signing the Agreement below; (2) notifying Buyer in writing of Seller's acceptance; or (3) beginning performance of the Services set forth herein. • This transaction is subject to prior approval of Buyer's credit to the sole satisfaction of Seller. • Buyer is responsible for proper preparation of the Site prior to delivery of the Equipment in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

Product Information
Qty Purchase Price Extended Purchase Price Taxable

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH

PRECISION ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR THE DESIGN

AND INSTALLATION OF A SOLAR ELECTRIC SYSTEM

AT THE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS YARD
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issue:

Should the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a contract with Precision Electric Company for the design and installation of a solar electric system at the Public Works Operations Yard?
Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing a contract with Precision Electric Company for the design and installation of a solar electric system at the Public Works Operations Yard.

Fiscal Impact:

CIP Number 8609 Public Works Solar and EV Charging Station Project will be funded through a California Air Resources Board grant ($400,000) and general funds ($547,000), for a total budget of $947,000.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
Environmental Review:

The project is exempt from environmental review in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303. Section 15303 states that “new construction or conversion of small structures” are exempt. The project meets all the conditions necessary to qualify for the exemption and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 BE-3: Municipal Facility Energy Retrofit Program
 RE-1: Increase Renewable Energy and Energy Storage at Municipal Facilities
 T-6: Municipal Fleet Transition
BACKGROUND:

The City is a recipient of a $400,000 grant for a solar electrical system at Public Works Corporation Yard from the California Air Resource Board (CARB) and supported by Senator Dr. Akilah Weber Pierson in Assembly Bill 102, the California State Budget Act of 2023.

In 2024 City staff issued a Request for Qualifications to develop a comprehensive energy program pursuant to Government Code 4217. This recent law allows local agencies to accelerate the procurement process by directly selecting a qualified energy provider who can provide a turnkey system (one designed and built by the contractor) with financing through electrical energy savings.

In July 2025 City staff received a proposal from Precision Electric Company to provide the design and installation of a solar electric system including electric vehicle charging stations at the Public Works Operations Yard. This location was selected based on construction simplicity. Additionally, the proposed system will provide almost 100 percent of the facility’s power needs.

DISCUSSION:

A solar savings energy analysis of the proposed system was prepared that shows the out-of-pocket cost to the City would be paid back via savings on electric energy consumption in approximately 7.6 years (Attachment B). Over the projected 25-year lifetime of the solar energy infrastructure, the cumulative savings is estimated between $1.2 and $1.6 million. The cost to implement the energy-related improvements will be less

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
than the anticipated cost of energy consumed in the absence of energy improvements.

The project is being considered under California Government Code §4217, which allows public agencies to approve energy projects when anticipated savings exceed project costs. In accordance with §4217, the required public notice was provided on November 25, 2025, and a public hearing was conducted at the December 9, 2025 City Council meeting to allow for review and comment before Council action.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council award a contract in accordance with Government Code 4217 with Precision Electric Company for the completion of design and installation of a solar electric system at the Public Works Operations Yard.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________ ____________________________
Hilary Ego Carly Cubberley, PE
Environmental Sustainability Manager Engineering Project Manager Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Solar Energy Analysis
C. Precision Electric Company Proposal

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AUTHORIZING A

CONTRACT WITH PRECISION ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR THE DESIGN AND

INSTALLATION OF A SOLAR ELECTRIC SYSTEM AT THE PUBLIC WORKS

OPERATIONS YARD
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa adopted a Climate Action Plan in March 2018, which establishes a goal to reduce community-wide greenhouse gas emissions through infrastructure improvements and other programs;
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 102 (AB 102), the California State Budget Act of 2023, specifically designated the City of La Mesa to receive a grant from the California Air Resource Board (CARB) of $400,000 for a public works solar panel and battery storage project; WHEREAS, the project is being considered under California Government Code §4217, which allows public agencies to approve energy projects when anticipated savings exceed project costs. In accordance with §4217, the required public notice was provided on November 25, 2025, and a public hearing was conducted on the December 9, 2025; WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa entered into a contract with the State of California to complete the project in December of 2024;
WHEREAS, Precision Electric Company worked with City of La Mesa staff to complete a preliminary solar electric system design for the Public Works Operations Yard; WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 4217.10-4217.18, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects may be sole-sourced or procured through either formal or informal procurement if the City Council is able to make findings at a regular meeting, following a public hearing, that the cost of the proposed project will be less than the anticipated cost of energy that would have been consumed by the City if the project is not completed (i.e., the energy cost savings exceed the project cost);
WHEREAS, based on all the evidence presented, the City Council finds as follows:

1. This project is a positive step in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and operating costs at facilities owned and operated by the City;

2. It has been determined that the cost of the proposed project will be less than the anticipated cost of energy that would have been consumed by the City if the project is not completed in accordance with Government Code §§4217.10-4217.18;

3. The project will result in positive annual cash flow and significant net savings to the City of La Mesa over the useful life of the equipment being installed; and WHEREAS, the project is exempt from environmental review in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303. Section 15303 states that “new construction or conversion of small structures” are exempt. The project meets all the conditions necessary to qualify for the exemption and none of the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

1. That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporate herein as findings and determinations.

2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a contract with Precision Electric Company for the completion of design and installation of a solar electric system at the Public Works Operations Yard for the amount of $947,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Attachment B: Solar Energy Analysis
Solar Energy System Analysis: 100 kW Installation under NEM 3.0 The City’s annual electricity usage averages 138,367 kWh, resulting in an annual energy cost of $71,980.87, or approximately $0.52 per kWh. This consumption profile represents a substantial opportunity for cost savings through renewable energy investment.

A proposed 100 kW solar installation is estimated to produce approximately 166,621 kWh annually under the local solar conditions in La Mesa. Under NEM 3.0, the system’s generation would primarily offset on-site electricity consumption, with any excess generation exported to the grid credited at a lower export rate.

With production exceeding the City’s annual usage, the system would fully cover all onsite electricity demand except for approximately 2450 kWh combined shortfall in the months of January and September, offsetting 135,917 kWh of usage. The remaining 30,704 kWh of excess energy could be exported to the grid, with a conservative export credit of $0.05 per kWh, resulting in approximately $1535.20 of additional annual value.

To reduce the overall cost of electricity from the grid down to $0

Attachment B: Solar Energy Analysis
The system’s out-of-pocket cost of $550,000 to the City results in a payback period of approximately 7.6 years. After this point, the City would realize net savings from reduced energy bills for the remainder of the system’s operational lifetime, adjusted for minor maintenance and eventual inverter replacements.

Over a projected 25-year lifetime, assuming 0.5% annual degradation and a 3% annual electricity rate inflation, the cumulative savings could reach $1.2–$1.6 million, including both avoided energy costs and revenue from exported electricity. This demonstrates the system’s potential to provide predictable, long-term financial benefits in addition to significant environmental and sustainability contributions.

Attachment B: Solar Energy Analysis
In conclusion, the proposed 100 kW solar installation represents a cost-effective and environmentally responsible approach to reducing electricity costs and enhancing energy resilience. With detailed charts illustrating monthly production, energy offset, and cumulative savings, this analysis clearly demonstrates that solar investment under NEM

3.0 can provide both measurable financial and sustainability benefits for the City.

BID
LINE (619) 966-9671

November 6, 2025
Project: City of La Mesa - 100KW DC PV Roof Mount System, One Solar Carport and 4 EV Charging Stations.

We are pleased to provide you with our proposal for a design-built 100 KW DC PV system (divided between roof mount system, and one solar carport), Two (level 3) and Three (level 2) EV Charging stations work for the above referenced project at 8152 Commercial Street La Mesa CA. Our proposal includes all material, tax, labor, insurance, tools, equipment, submittals, O&M manuals, startup, and commissioning. Our bid is for solar installation work and based upon information provided. Items not shown or cross-referenced on the listed drawings or specifications (not provided) or excluded are not considered in this proposal or scope of work and are not included in the proposal price.

Base Bid 947,000
Clarifications:
• Provide and install total of (182) AXITECH Solar Modules @ 550-watt each (or equivalent solar modules) for a total of 100 Kw DC Solar carport system per PEC`s design. • Provide and install one 41 kw solar carport at 14’ high on location and layout shown on site layout enclosed.
• Provide and install 59 Kw roof mount solar array on main building. • Provide and install 2 x SE50KW 208V SolarEdge 208V string inverter (or equivalent string inverter) per PEC`s design.
• Provide and install an EMT/ PVC conduit for DC/AC wire between solar modules and DC/AC equipment to electric room and main switchboard.
• Provide and install AC disconnect for solar system equipment. • Provide and install standard solar system production monitoring system. • Provide & installation (2) Level 3 @80 KW/each Charging Point - Express 280 DC fast charging for total of 160kw charging capacity when paired together. (Each 80-kw station has dual ports, but only one port can be used for charging up to 80kw at the time.) • Provide & installation (3) Level 2 @ 19 KW Charging Point (CP6021- L5.5) EV dual ports charging station.
• Provide and install an EMT/ PVC conduit, wire, AC disconnect, breakers for DC/AC connection between charging station and main switchboard at electric room. • Prepare and submit utility paperwork for interconnection of PV system to utility Company. • Confirm proper operation/efficiency and commissioning, as necessary. • If electric and solar equipment/material are not available or has a long lead time, PEC will suggest alternate equivalent equipment, GC agrees to submit it to the engineer to review. and approve if necessary.
• All work is based on M-F 7:00am-3:30 pm.
• The proposal is contingent upon contract terms and conditions, on a project specific basis,

BID
LINE (619) 966-9671

being acceptable to PEC.
• By listing Precision Electric company, the contractor accepts, and agrees to terms of this proposal. • 1 - year workmanship warranty (Warranty does not cover the owner`s provided material.) • 10 - Years string inverter warranty through manufacturer. • 10 - Year product and 25-year solar panel power performance warranty through manufacturer. • 2 - Years EV charging station warranty through manufacturer. Extended warranty with service available upon request at additional cost.
• Our bid is based on prevailing wage rates.
• PEC reserves the right to revise prices due to material, equipment, freight, and fuel escalations at time of procurement.

We exclude the following:
• Any engineering, design, calculation, modification, additional support, and/or retro fit of the Retaining wall due to the carport installation at the location at upper section of the parking lot. • Custom design of solar roof mounting system or attachment, and Solar mounting roof attachment support or backing of any kind.
• Additional engineering, design, material, labor, and permitting due to unforeseen conditions or owner, general contractor, third party inspection, and AHJ requirements. Third party inspectors, lab verification or costs associated with each.
• Any concrete scope of work including sawcut and patch back. • All fees. To include, but not limited to, permits, storm water management, air pollution, encroachment, and third-party accounting systems such as Textura CPM. • Painting of any kind, patching, access panels, and cutting or replacing ceiling tiles. • Grade staking or site surveying. Landscape Repairs, S.W.P. P’s, or Geotech engineering report. • Demolition of any kind, Disconnect, Remove, replace, repair, upgrade or recycle existing equipment.

Removal, disposal, handling, or abatement of hazardous materials. Dumpster fees or containers, including city recycling fees,
• Existing roof repair, stability, pre-existing roof leaks, structural engineering calculation & stamp, structural upgrades, Wall, roof and floor x ray, scan, and coring, • Main electric service equipment/upgrades, utility service equipment/upgrades, and/or service entrance conductors/upgrades. Stand- by power generator or power shutdown application. All existing electrical issues, relay protection settings, RDB file, power flow, or power study, trench simulation. • PV system annual Kwh energy production guarantees incentives and utility electricity bill reimbursement. • lightning and surge protection system and installation, Battery storage system equipment, and installation.

EV Charger equipment, and any related material and labor. • light pole and bollard base install or removal. Tree removal, landscaping removal, or replanting. • All or any fees. To include, but not limited to ADA requirements per AHJ, owner, general contractor, or third-party inspection.

BID
LINE (619) 966-9671

• Anti-Vibration and Pads & Isolators, housekeeping pads, concrete wash out requirements, bollard base material, and labor of any kind.
• DAS monitoring system material and components, Internet service set up or additional ISP equipment. • Bidirectional net metering replacement or power shutdown application. • Temporary power for the building, any power generators and equipment’s to provide power through construction period and required shutdown.
• Any project schedule delay due to Third party, material delivery, City / County or utility plan review and permit process.
• Crane rent, permit/fees, and traffic plan.
• Equipment and material, Labor rate price escalation
Note: Ts proposal may withdraw if not accepted within 30 days.

Note: This proposal is an estimate. System design may change after a site survey and engineering design.

If you should have any questions, please contact us.

Respectfully submitted:

Brandon Abell (619)971-8205
Aram Mardirosian (619)971-9164

City of La Mesa - 100 KW DC Solar Photovoltaic and EV Charging Stations Schedule of Value
#
Budget
Code Description Amount
1 Site Survey, Design & Engineering, Permitting, Mobilization. $50,000 2 Photovoltaic Submittals, Material Securement, Net Metering Application. $100,000 3 Procurement of Solar Carport, Solar Modules, Mounting System, Inverters, EV Charging, AC Equipment. $300,000 4 Material Delivery, Layout Panels & Equipment. $57,000 5 Install Solar Carport Foundation/Steel Structure and Solar Roof Mounting Racking System. $100,000 6 Solar Panels Installation & DC stringing. $100,000
7 Rough in Conduit for Solar Arrays, DC Stringing Connection and PV wire. $50,000 8 Solar Inverter Installation, DC Disconnects Connection and Termination. $25,000 9 AC Equipment Installation, AC Wire pull, PV breakers, Terminations and Connection. $50,000 10 PV Monitoring Installation and Programing. $10,000
11 Installation of (3) Level 2 EV Charging station and (1) Level 3 EV DC Fast Charging Station. $75,000 12 Solar Photovoltaic System and EV Charging station Testing & Commissioning. $10,000 13 First AHJ Inspection and Correction list $10,000
14 Final AHJ Inspection. $5,000
15 SDG&E Final Inspection & Permit to Operate (PTO) $5000 Grand Total: $947,000

ChargePoint® Express 280

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 2 Ordering Information
The order codes below represent specific product configurations. Other product options are available.

Please contact ChargePoint Sales for information and order codes.

Hardware
Description Order Code
Model
Express 280 Station includes 2x Power Modules, 1 x

5.4m CCS1 cable, 1x 5.4m NACS cable CPE280-800-NA-3A1S1-3A4S1 Express 280 Station includes 2x Power Modules, 1 x

5.4m CCS1 cable, 1x 5.4m CHAdeMO cable CPE280-800-NA-3A1S1-1A3S1 Express 280 Station includes 2x Power Modules, 1 x

5.4m CCS1 cable CPE280-800-NA-3A1S1
Express 280 Station includes 2x Power Modules, 2 x

7.5m CCS1 cable CPE280-800-NA-3A1M2-3A1M2
Hardware Accessories
Description Order Code
AC Surface Conduit
Entry Kit
Express 280 Surface Conduit Entry AC
Extrusion for above ground conduit
installations of a single station. Requires
CPE280-SCEK-AC-KIT.

CPE280-SCEK-AC-EXTRUSION
Express 280 Surface Conduit Entry AC
Side Kit for above ground conduit
installations of a single station. Requires
CPE280-SCEK-AC-EXTRUSION.

CPE280-SCEK-AC-KIT
DC Surface Conduit
Entry Kit
Express 280 Surface Conduit Entry DC
Extrusion for one station when pairing
Express 280 stations using above ground
conduits. Requires CPE280-SCEK-DC-KIT.

CPE280-SCEK-DC-EXTRUSION
Express 280 Surface Conduit Entry DC
Side Kit for one station when pairing
Express 280 stations using above ground
conduits. Requires CPE280-SCEK-DCEXTRUSION.

CPE280-SCEK-DC-KIT

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 3 Concrete Mounting
Template
Concrete mounting template for bottom
cable entry for poured concrete
applications

DC-UNIVERSAL-CMT-METRIC
Software & Services
ChargePoint Express 280 requires the purchase of separate Cloud, Activation and Commissioning services to ensure a smooth deployment and support experience. ChargePoint also offers various support plans such as ChargePoint Assure.® Learn more at www.chargepoint.com/products/guides.

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 4 Express 280 Specifications
Station Electrical Input
Input Rating North America: 3-phase, 480WYE VAC (91.5 kVA), 100 A, 60 Hz Wiring L1, L2, L3, Earth
Short Circuit Current Rating 65 kA
Station Electrical Output
Max Output Power 80 kW
Output Voltage, Charging 100 to 1000 VDC
Max Output Current
CHAdeMO (North America): 140 A
CCS1: 200 A
North American Charging Standard (NACS): 200 A
Power Modules per Station 2
Paired Station Electrical Output
Paired Max Output Power 160 kW
Output Voltage, Charging 100 to 1000 VDC
Paired Max Output Current
CHAdeMO (North America): 140 A
CCS1: 250A
NACS: 250A
Power Modules per Pair 4
Power Module Output
Max Output Power 40 kW
Max Output Current 100 A
Power Conversion Efficiency Up to 96%
Power Factor 0.99 at full load

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 5 Power Module Specifications
Power Module Dimensions 760 mm H x 430 mm W x 130 mm D (2 ft 6 in x 1 ft 5 in x 5 ft) Power Module Weight 45 kg (98.5 lb)
Power Module Cooling Liquid Cooling Technology
Harmonics iTHD < 5% (Complies with IEEE 519)
Functional Interfaces
Number of Connectors Up to two connectors per station. Sequential charging between 2 connectors on the same station
Supported Connector Types
CHAdeMO
CCS1 (SAE J1772™ Combo)
NACS
Cable Length
Standard 5.4 m (18 ft) with Cable Management Kit (CMK)* Medium 7.5 m (24 ft) with Tall Cable Management Kit (CMK)* LCD Display Full-color 254 mm (10 in) display for driver interaction Authentication
RFID: ISO 15693, ISO 14443, NEMA EVSE 1.2-2015 (UR)
Tap to Charge (NFC on Apple & Android, contactless credit card) ISO 15118-2, Plug&Charge
Remote: Mobile and in vehicle (if supported by vehicle) * Horizontal reach to typical vehicle charging port: 3.76 m (12 ft 4 in) with Standard cable and Standard cable and 6m (20 ft) with Medium cable.

Connectivity Features
Vehicle Safety Communication
CHAdeMO: JEVS G104 over CAN
CCS1 and NACS: SAE J1772 over PLC
Plug-Out Detection Power terminated per SAE J2931 (CCS1) and JEVS G104 (CHAdeMO)
Local Area Network 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz WiFi (802.11 b/g/n) Wide Area Network 4G LTE
Supported Communication
Protocols OCPP 2.0.1

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 6 Service and Maintenance Remote system monitoring, diagnostic, and proactive maintenance
Safety and Operational Ratings
Station Enclosure Rating Type 3R
Station Impact Rating IK10
Safety and Compliance
UL and cUL listed: Complies with UL 2202, UL 2231-1, UL 2231- 2 Energy Star, NTEP/CTEP
Station Surge Protection Tested to IEC 6100-4-5, Level 5 (6 kV @ 3,000 A) EMC Compliance North America: FCC part 15 Subpart B Class A Storage Temperature -40°C to 50°C (-40°F to 122°F)
Operating Temperature -40°C to 50°C (-40°F to 122°F) with derating Operational Altitude < 3,000 m (9,800 ft)
Operating Humidity Up to 95% at 50°C (122°F) non-condensing Generic Specifications
Station Enclosure Dimensions
Standard CMK: 2,413 mm H x 712 mm W x 438 mm D (7 ft 11 in x 2 ft 4 in x 1 ft 4 in)
Tall CMK: 3,048 mm H x 712 mm W x 438 mm D (10 ft x 2 ft 4 in x 1 ft 4 in)
Station Weight (without Power
Modules) 250 kg (551 lb)
Standard Warranty Limited 2-Year Parts Warranty
Energy Management Features
Dynamic Power Management Allows a fixed maximum power output per station or lets the system dynamically manage the power distribution per station Remote Energy Management Manage output power via the ChargePoint Admin Portal, API, and Open ADR 2.0b VEN

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 7 Architectural Drawings
Note: Images are not to scale. Measurements appear in metric units (mm), followed by imperial equivalents (inches).

Express 280
Express 280, with Tall CMK, and dual CCS1 connectors.
1023
(40.3)
583
(23)
1221
(48)
722
(28.4)
2413
(95)
2132
(84)
1139
(44.8)
410
(16.1)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 8 Express 280, with Tall CMK, and dual CCS1 connectors. 1250
(49.2)
431
(17)
1221
(48)
722
(28.4)
3048
(120)
2132
(84)
1139
(44.8)
410
(16.1)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2025
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 9 Express 280 Power Module
Contact Us
ChargePoint, Inc.
240 East Hacienda Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008-6617 USA
+1.408.841.4500 or
+1.877.370.3802 US and Canada toll-free
Visit chargepoint.com
Call +1.408.705.1992
Email [email protected]
Copyright © 2025 ChargePoint, Inc. All rights reserved. CHARGEPOINT is a U.S. registered trademark/service mark, and an EU registered logo mark of ChargePoint, Inc. All other products or services mentioned are the trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks or registered service marks of their respective owners. July 2025 126
(5)
432
(17)
768
(30.25)

ChargePoint® CP6000 AC Commercial Station
Specifications and Ordering Information
Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 2 Ordering Information
The order codes below represent specific product configurations. Please contact ChargePoint Sales for additional information. Specify model number followed by the applicable code(s).

The order code sequence is Model-Options. Software, Services and Other are ordered as separate line items.

Hardware: Station Model
Description Order Code
80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable CP6021B-80A-L5.5 80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable CP6011B-80A-L5.5 80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
EMV
chip reader
CP6021B-80A-L5.5-CHIP
80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6011B-80A-L5.5-CHIP
50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable CP6021B-50A-L5.5 50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable CP6011B-50A-L5.5 50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6021B-50A-L5.5-CHIP
50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6011B-50A-L5.5-CHIP
80 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable CP6023B-80A-L5.5 80 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable CP6013B-80A-L5.5 80 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, EMV
chip reader
CP6023B-80A-L5.5-CHIP
80 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, EMV
chip reader
CP6013B-80A-L5.5-CHIP
50 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable CP6023B-50A-L5.5 50 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable CP6013B-50A-L5.5 50 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, EMV
chip
CP6023B-50A-L5.5-CHIP

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 3 reader
50 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, EMV
chip reader
CP6013B-50A-L5.5-CHIP
80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable CP6021B-80A-L7 80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable CP6011B-80A-L7 80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6021B-80A-L7-CHIP
80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
EMV
chip reader
CP6011B-80A-L7-CHIP
50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable CP6021B-50A-L7 50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable CP6011B-50A-L7 50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6021B-50A-L7-CHIP
50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
EMV chip reader
CP6011B-50A-L7-CHIP
80 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable CP6023B-80A-L7
80 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable CP6013B-80A-L7 80 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, EMV
chip reader
CP6023B-80A-L7-CHIP
80 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, EMV
chip
reader
CP6013B-80A-L7-CHIP
50 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable CP6023B-50A-L7
50 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable CP6013B-50A-L7 50 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, EMV
chip reader
CP6023B-50A-L7-CHIP
50 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, EMV
chip
reader
CP6013B-50A-L7-CHIP

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 4 80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6621B-80A-L5.5
80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6611B-80A-L5.5
50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6621B-50A-L5.5
50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 18 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6611B-50A-L5.5
80 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6623B-80A-L5.5
80 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6613B-80A-L5.5
50 A Dual port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6623B-50A-L5.5
50 A Single port, wall mount, 18 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6613B-50A-L5.5
80 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6621B-80A-L7
80 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6611B-80A-L7
50 A Dual port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6621B-50A-L7
50 A Single port, pedestal mount, 23 ft cable,
Omni Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6611B-50A-L7

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 5 80 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6623B-80A-L7
80 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6613B-80A-L7
50 A Dual port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6623B-50A-L7
50 A Single port, wall mount, 23 ft cable, Omni
Port (enables J1772 and/or NACS vehicle
charging)
CP6613B-50A-L7
Hardware: Other
Description Order Code
Pedestal Concrete Mounting Kit CP6K-CMT-NA
CP6000 Dual Port Omni Port Conversion Kit CP6000-DUAL-J1772-NACS-OMNI-CONV-KIT CP6000 Single Port Omni Port Conversion Kit CP6000-SINGLE-J1772-NACS-OMNI-CONV-KIT Software and Services
Description Order Code
ChargePoint Enterprise Plan CPCLD-ENTERPRISE-n*
ChargePoint Fleet Commercial CPCLD-COMMERCIAL-n*
ChargePoint Assure CP6000-ASSURE-n*
ChargePoint Installation CP6000-INSTALL-COMMISSIONING
Note: All CP6000 stations require a network service plan per port. *Substitute n for desired years (1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 years)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 6 Architectural Drawings and Dimensions
Pedestal Mount

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 7 Wall Mount

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 8 General Specifications
Electrical Input
The CP6000 AC Commercial Station supports flexible electrical input/output settings up to 80 A to fit your fueling needs, whether for a workplace, multi-family dwelling, or other application.

Power Select allows stations to be installed and configured for current lower than the maximum 80 A.

Power Select current options include 16 A, 24 A, 32 A, 40 A, 48 A, 50 A, 56 A, 64 A, and 72 A.

Power Share allows a dual-port station to share power from a single circuit across two ports, adjusting power depending on whether one or both are charging. Standard wiring uses an independent circuit for each port. Power Share can be used in combination with Power Select.

Station Electrical
Input
Single Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V AC)
Dual Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V AC)
Input
Current
Input
Power
Connection
Required
Service
Panel
Breaker
Input
Current
Input Power
Connection
Required
Service
Panel
Breaker
80 A Maximum
80 A
(Standard)
80 A One 100 A
branch
circuit
100 A
dual pole
(nonGFCI)
80 A x
2 Two
independent
100 A
branch
circuits
100 A
dual pole
(non
GFCI) x 2
Maximum
80 A
(Power
Share*)
N/A N/A N/A 80 A One 100 A
branch
circuit
100 A
dual pole
(non
GFCI)
Power
Select**
16 A – 72
A
(Standard)
16 A -
72 A
One
branch
circuit
rated
125% of
input
current (20
A – 90 A)
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)
rated
125% of
input
current (20
A – 90 A)
16 A -
72 A x
2 Two
independent
branch
circuits
rated 125%
of input
current (20
A – 90 A)
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)
rated
125% of
input
current
(20 A – 90
A) x 2
Power
Select 16
A
N/A N/A N/A 16 A -
72 A
One branch
circuit rated
125% of
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 9 - 72 A
(Power
Share)
input
current (20
A – 90 A)
rated
125% of
input
current (20
A – 90 A)
50 A Maximum
50 A
(Standard)
50 A One 70 A
branch
circuit
70 A dual
pole (nonGFCI)
50 A x
2 Two
independent
70 A branch
circuits
70 A dual
pole (non
GFCI) x 2
Maximum
50 A
(Power
Share*)
N/A N/A N/A 80 A One 70 A
branch
circuit
70 A dual
pole (non
GFCI)
Power
Select**
16 A – 48
A
(Standard)
16 A -
48 A
One
branch
circuit
rated
125% of
input
current (20
A – 60 A)
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)
rated
125% of
input
current
(20 A- 60
A)
16 A -
48 A x
2 Two
independent
branch
circuits
rated 125%
of input
current (20
A – 60 A)
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)
rated
125% of
input
current
(20 A – 60
A) x 2
Power
Select 16
A
- 48 A
(Power
Share)
N/A N/A N/A 16 A -
48 A
One branch
circuit rated
125% of
input
current (20
A – 60 A)
Dual pole
(nonGFCI)
rated
125% of
input
current
(20 A – 60
A)
Service Panel/Breaker
GFCI
Do not provide external GFCI as it may conflict with internal GFCI (CCID) Wiring – Standard 3-wire (L1, L2, Earth) No neutral 5-wire (L1, L1, L2, L2, Earth) Wiring – Power Share N/A 3-wire (L1, L2, Earth)
Station Power 8 W typical (standby), 15 W maximum (operation)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 10 Line to Ground Voltage 120 V +/- 10%
Electrical Output for 80A Station
Electrical Output Single Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V
AC)
Dual Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V
AC)
Maximum 80 A (Standard) 19.2 kW (240 V AC @ 80A) 19.2 kW (240 V AC @ 80 A) Maximum 80 A (Power Share) N/A 19.2 kW (240V AC @ 80A) x 1 or

9.6 kW (240V AC @ 40A) x 2
Power Select 16A - 72A
(Standard)

3.8 kW - 17.3 kW (240V AC @
16A - 72A)

3.8 kW - 17.3 kW (240V AC @
16A - 72A) x 2
Power Select 16A - 72A (Power
Share)
N/A 3.8 kW - 17.3 kW (240V AC @
16A - 72A) x 1
or

1.9 kW - 8.6 kW (240V AC @
8A
- 36A) x 2
Electrical Output for 50A Station
Electrical Output Single Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V
AC)
Dual Port
(AC Voltage 208 / 240 V
AC)
Maximum 50A (Standard) 12.0 kW (240V AC @ 50A) 12.0 kW (240V AC @ 50A) Maximum 50A (Power Share) N/A 12.0 kW (240V AC @ 50A) x 1 or

6.0 kW (240V AC @ 25A) x 2
Power Select 16A - 48A
(Standard)

3.8 kW - 11.5 kW (240V AC @
16A - 48A)

3.8 kW - 11.5 kW (240V AC @
16A - 48A) x 2
N/A 3.8 kW - 11.5 kW (240V AC @

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 11 Power Select 16A - 48A (Power
Share)
16A - 48A) x 1
or

1.9 kW - 5.8 kW (240V AC @
8A
- 24A) x 2
Mounting and Functional Interfaces
Connector Type J1772, NACS (Omni Port)
Number of Ports Single, dual
Mounting Pedestal, wall
Cable Length 18 ft (5.5 m), 23 ft (7 m)
Cable Management Yes
Authentication and Payment
RFID: ISO 15693, ISO 14443, NEMA EVSE 1.2-2015 (UR)
Virtual RFID NFC (Tap to Charge)
Contactless credit card
Virtual Contactless credit card Apple Pay / Google Pay
EMV chip credit card (available on -CHIP models only)
Remote: Mobile App and In Vehicle Dash (if supported by vehicle) Locking Holster Yes
ISO 15118 Protocol Supported by hardware
Display
Full color 8-inch interactive display with full motion video, UV protection, gesture touch controls, and multi-language support Safety and Connectivity Features
Ground Fault Detection 20 mA CCID with auto retry
Open Safety Ground Detection Continuously monitors presence of safety (green wire) ground connection
Plug-Out Detection Power terminated per SAE J1772 specifications Energy Measurement Meter accuracy 1%
Accuracy class 2.0

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 12 Acceptance tolerance 1.0%
Power Report/Store Interval 15-minute interval aligned to hour. Responsive to load management signals.

Local Area Network Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz and 5GHz (802.11 a/n/b/g) Wide Area Network LTE Category 4
Network Communication
Protocol
OCPP 2.0.1
Ethernet connection Capable with accessory
Safety and Operational Ratings
Station Enclosure Rating Type 3R per UL 50E
Safety and Compliance UL and cUL listed; complies with UL 2594, UL 2231-1, UL 2231-2, and NEC Article 625
Energy Star

NTEP/CTEP
Station Surge Protection 6 kV @ 3,000 A. In geographic areas subject to frequent thunderstorms, supplemental surge protection at the service panel is recommended.

Short Circuit Current Rating 5 kA
EMC Compliance FCC Part 15 Class B
Operating Temperature -40°C to 50°C (-40°F to 122°F)
Non-Operating Temperature -40°C to 60°C (-40°F to 140°F) Terminal Block Temperature
Rating
105°C (221°F)
Operating Humidity Up to 85% @ 50°C (122°F) non-condensing Non-Operating Humidity Up to 95% @ 50°C (122°F) non-condensing Other Specifications
Weight Wall Mount: 68 kg (150 lb)

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 13 Pedestal Mount: 77 kg (170 lb)
Warranty Limited 2-Year Parts Warranty
FHWA Buy American compliant options available
Contact Us
ChargePoint, Inc.
240 East Hacienda Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008-6617 USA
+1.408.841.4500 or
+1.877.370.3802 US and Canada toll-free
Visit chargepoint.com
Call +1.408.705.1992
Email [email protected]

ChargePoint, Inc. | Copyright © 2024
ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 14 Copyright © 2024 ChargePoint, Inc. All rights reserved. CHARGEPOINT is a U.S. registered trademark/service mark, and an EU registered logo mark of ChargePoint, Inc. All other products or services mentioned are the trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks or registered service marks of their respective owners. August 2024

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
A.) RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE

BUDGET FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH FISCAL YEAR
PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2026, THROUGH JUNE 30,
2027 (ROPS 26-27 PERIOD), AND APPROVING

RELATED ACTIONS
B.) RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
(ROPS 26-27) FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH FISCAL
YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2026, THROUGH
JUNE 30, 2027, AND APPROVING RELATED

ACTIONS
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager’s Office and Finance
SUMMARY:

Issues:

1. Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027?

2. Should the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027?
Recommendation:

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 2 of 5

1. That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027; and

2. That the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.

Fiscal Impact:

The ROPS 26-27 identifies all payment obligations of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency), the anticipated timeframes for payment of the obligations, and the funding sources from which the payments are made. Of note, the ROPS 26-27 includes as Item #5 on the ROPS Detail, an enforceable obligation of the Successor Agency, the City’s carryback loan to the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency for the former Redevelopment Agency’s purchase of real property from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, among other items. This Item #5 was previously approved by the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board to the La Mesa Successor Agency, and the California Department of Finance (Department of Finance) on a prior ROPS as an “enforceable obligation”.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Dissolution Law governing the wind-down of the former La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency’s (Former RDA) affairs requires the Successor Agency to prepare an Administrative Budget before each fiscal year period and to submit the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board (defined below) for approval. The Dissolution Law further requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (County Auditor-Controller) for each 6-month period in the fiscal year the administrative cost estimates from its approved Administrative Budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) established for the Successor Agency. The administrative cost estimates paid with RPTTF for the fiscal year is also known as Administrative Cost Allowance. Based on a thorough review of past and present administrative expenses and responsibilities, the Successor Agency is requesting

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 3 of 5
for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 a total amount of $18,900 as its Administrative Cost Allowance to pay its estimated administrative costs that are detailed in the proposed Administrative Budget.

In addition, the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period and to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 (ROPS 26-27), after approval by the Oversight Board (defined below), to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2026. The ROPS serves as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source. The County Auditor-Controller is responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues from the RPTTF sufficient to meet the requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period. In this regard, RPTTF funds are paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency on January 2 and June 1 of each year to make payments on the approved ROPS. The Successor Agency has determined that it requires a total amount of $1,214,234 from the RPTTF for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to meet the financial enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency listed on the ROPS 26-27.

Payment obligations listed on the ROPS 26-27 include funding for the legal defense of the lawsuit filed by the San Diego Affordable Housing Coalition, funding for annual auditing services, and payment to the City of the City’s carryback loan to the Former RDA for the Former RDA’s purchase of real property located at 8181 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California (commonly referred to as the “Old Police Station Site”) from the City for development of low and moderate income affordable housing, and the Administrative Cost Allowance for the Successor Agency.

As a part of the ROPS 26-27, the Dissolution Law requires a reporting of cash balances for the prior period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 to determine the amount of unspent RPTTF funds received by the Successor Agency for payment obligations listed on the ROPS 23-24 that can be allocated and used toward payment obligations listed on the ROPS 26-27. A separate reconciliation of the ROPS 23-24 covering the period from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 has determined an unaudited total amount of $33,750 in unspent RPTTF funds which, if concurred by the Department of Finance, will be used by the Successor Agency to fund payment obligations listed on the ROPS 26-27, and therefore reduce the amount of RPTTF to be paid by the County Auditor-Controller to the Successor Agency in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the ROPS 26-27.

In 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (Oversight Board) was established pursuant to the Dissolution Law. This Oversight Board oversees all successor agencies located in the County of San Diego, including the Successor Agency, and replaces by operation of law the previously constituted local oversight board of the Successor Agency. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 4 of 5
entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are set forth in the Dissolution Law.

Pursuant to the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is obligated to prepare and submit the ROPS on forms provided by the Department of Finance. In this regard, the Successor Agency staff has included in both Resolution No. 2025-xxx SA (i.e. Section 3(vi)) and Resolution No. 2025-xxx SA (i.e. Section 3(iv)) authorization and direction to the Executive Director or designee to revise the ROPS 26-27 and the Administrative Budget (if necessary), and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 26-27 and the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 26-27 and the Administrative Budget in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 26-27 and the Administrative Budget to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance. The Oversight Board will consider the Administrative Budget and the ROPS 26-27 at its meeting set for Thursday, January 15, 2026, and the deadline to submit the ROPS 26-27 to the Department of Finance is February 1, 2026.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the Successor Agency take the following actions:

1. Adopt a resolution approving the Administrative Budget for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027; and

2. Adopt a resolution approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 (ROPS 26- 27).

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________
Greg Humora Shannon Esenwein
City Manager Director of Finance
Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2026-xxx SA Approving the Administrative Budget B. Administrative Budget
C. Resolution No. 2026-xxx SA Approving the ROPS 26-27

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: December 9, 2025
Page: 5 of 5
D. ROPS 26-27

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025–XXX SA

RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2026, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027 (ROPS 26-27 PERIOD),

AND APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code;
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of paying, performing and enforcing the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies and expeditiously winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-005 on January 10, 2012, pursuant to Part 1.85 of AB 26, electing for the City to serve as the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Successor Agency”), and electing for the City to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions of the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Housing Successor”); WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved by operation of law and the Successor Agency and Housing Successor were established pursuant to AB 26;
WHEREAS, AB 26 has since been amended by various assembly and senate bills enacted and signed by the Governor. AB 26 as amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Dissolution Law”;
WHEREAS, in 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law;

2 WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to prepare an administrative budget and submit the administrative budget to the Oversight Board for approval. The administrative budget shall include all of the following: (i) estimated amounts for Successor Agency administrative costs for the upcoming two 6-month fiscal periods; (ii) proposed sources of payment for Successor Agency administrative costs; and (iii) proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations services provided by the City or other entity;
WHEREAS, H&S Code Section 34177(k) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to provide to the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) for each 6-month fiscal period the administrative cost estimates from its approved administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment revenues) deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) established for the Successor Agency;
WHEREAS, staff of the Successor Agency seeks the Successor Agency’s approval of the administrative budget for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 (“Administrative Budget”), in the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting, and the Successor Agency’s authorization to submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its approval and to forward the information required by H&S Code Section 34177(k) to the County Auditor-Controller;
WHEREAS, the Administrative Budget has been prepared in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Law and is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law. As indicated in the Administrative Budget, the Successor Agency does not directly employ its own staff but relies on the employees and staff members of the City to perform its functions and operations required by the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, the proposed source of payment of the costs set forth in the Administrative Budget in the amount of $18,900 is property taxes from the County’s RPTTF established for the Successor Agency. These costs in the amount of $18,900 are listed as Item #15 on the proposed Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 (“ROPS 26-27”) for funding from RPTTF, which ROPS 26- 27 is proposed to be considered by the Successor Agency at this same meeting of the Successor Agency;
WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency will submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the San Diego County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for review and approval;
WHEREAS, as required by H&S Code Section 34179(f) of the Dissolution Law, all notices required by law for proposed actions of the Oversight Board will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website or the Oversight Board’s internet website;

3 WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law, written notice and information about all actions taken by the Oversight Board shall be provided to the Department of Finance as an approved Resolution by electronic means and in a manner of the Department of Finance’s choosing; except, however, the Oversight Board is not required, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1)(B), to submit the Oversight Board action approving the Administrative Budget to the Department of Finance for its approval; WHEREAS, in furtherance of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the County Auditor-Controller and the State Controller’s Office and will be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website. If desired by the Successor Agency and the Oversight Board, a copy of the Administrative Budget as it may be approved by the Oversight Board will be submitted to the Department of Finance;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) and (3) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2026 and January 4, 2027 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the approved ROPS 26-27 and for the administrative cost allowance for administrative costs set forth in the Administrative Budget; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency as follows:

Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Successor Agency approves the Administrative Budget for the 12- month fiscal year period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.

Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) submit the approved Administrative Budget to the Oversight Board for its review and approval and concurrently submit a copy of the Administrative Budget to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance; (ii) if desired by the Successor Agency or the Oversight Board, submit the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, and written notice of the Oversight Board’s approval of the Administrative Budget by Resolution, to the Department of Finance electronically pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(h)(1) of the Dissolution Law; (iii) submit a copy of the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, to the County AuditorController and the State Controller’s Office; (iv) post the Administrative Budget, as approved by the Oversight Board, on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (v) upon approval of the Oversight Board, submit to the County Auditor-Controller the administrative cost estimates from the Administrative Budget in the amount of $18,900 that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the County’s Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established for the Successor Agency; (vi) revise the Administrative Budget, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the Administrative Budget to the

4 Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the Administrative Budget in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the Administrative Budget to the form or format as may be prescribed by the Department of Finance; and (vii) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.

Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

Section 5. The adoption of this Resolution is not intended to and shall not constitute a waiver by the Successor Agency of any constitutional, legal or equitable rights that the Successor Agency may have to challenge, through any administrative or judicial proceedings, the effectiveness and/or legality of all or any portion of the Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following
vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025-xxx SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)

Successor Agency to the La Mesa Redevelopment Agency
Agency Administrative Budget
ROPS 26-27
July - December
2026
January - June
2027
Total for Fiscal
Year 2026-2027

SALARIES AND BENEFITS
Salaries $2,611.00 $2,611.00 $5,222.00
Benefits $1,770.75 $1,770.75 $3,541.50
Total Salaries & Benefits $4,381.75 $4,381.75 $8,763.50

OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Materials, Services & Supplies
Cell Phone Allowance $12.00 $12.00 $24.00
Office Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Postage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Books, Subscriptions & Printing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Dept Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Advertising $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Mileage $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Professional & Specialized Services $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 Car Allowance $56.25 $56.25 $112.50
Misc Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Special Other Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Materials, Services & Supplies $5,056.25 $5,056.25 $10,112.50 Total Successor Agency Admin Allowance $9,450.00 $9,450.00 $18,900.00

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX SA

RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING
THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS 26-27) FOR THE 12-MONTH FISCAL YEAR PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2026,
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027, AND APPROVING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) was a redevelopment agency in the City of La Mesa (“City”), duly created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code) (“Redevelopment Law”); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. X1 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.) (“AB 26”) was signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the Redevelopment Law and to the California Health and Safety Code (“H&S Code”), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the H&S Code;
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 26, as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011 by its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, all California redevelopment agencies, including the Redevelopment Agency, were dissolved on February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were designated and vested with the responsibility of paying, performing and enforcing the enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment agencies and expeditiously winding down the business and fiscal affairs of the former redevelopment agencies;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 2012-005 on January 10, 2012, pursuant to Part 1.85 of AB 26, electing for the City to serve as the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Successor Agency”), and electing for the City to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions of the Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency on February 1, 2012 under AB 26 (“Housing Successor”); WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved by operation of law and the Successor Agency and Housing Successor were established pursuant to AB 26;
WHEREAS, AB 26 has since been amended by various assembly and senate bills enacted and signed by the Governor. AB 26 as amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Dissolution Law”;
WHEREAS, in 2018, the County of San Diego Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179(j) of the Dissolution Law. The Oversight Board possesses fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property taxes and other revenues. The duties and responsibilities of the Oversight Board are primarily set forth in H&S Code Sections 34179 through 34181 of the Dissolution Law;

2 WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the California Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) issued the Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency pursuant to H&S Code Section 34179.7 of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34171(h) of the Dissolution Law, “Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule” (“ROPS”) means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency for each fiscal year as provided in H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(3) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS shall be forward looking to the next one year in accordance with H&S Code Section 34177(o);
WHEREAS, according to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall prepare a ROPS before each fiscal year period. For each recognized obligation, the ROPS shall identify one or more of the following sources of payment: (i) Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds, (ii) bond proceeds, (iii) reserve balances, (iv) administrative cost allowance, (v) the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation or by the provisions of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law, and (vi) other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived from the former Redevelopment Agency as approved by the Oversight Board in accordance with Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Dissolution Law that the ROPS serve as the designated reporting mechanism for disclosing the Successor Agency’s minimum fiscal year payment obligations by amount and source and that the San Diego County Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor-Controller”) will be responsible for ensuring that the Successor Agency receives revenues sufficient to meet the requirements of the ROPS during each fiscal year period; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency is required to submit the ROPS for the fiscal year period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, after its approval and adoption by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2026; WHEREAS, the ROPS covering the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 (“ROPS 26-27”) is presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting for review, approval, and adoption;
WHEREAS, if approved and adopted by the Successor Agency, the ROPS 26-27 shall thereafter be submitted to the Oversight Board for review, approval, and adoption. In this regard, H&S Code Sections 34177(l)(2)(B) and 34180(j) of the Dissolution Law requires the Successor Agency to submit a copy of the ROPS 26-27 to the San Diego County Administrative Officer (“County Administrative Officer”), the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the ROPS 26-27 to the Oversight Board for approval;

3 WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l)(2)(C) of the Dissolution Law, a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 26-27 shall be submitted to the County AuditorController, the State Controller’s Office and the Department of Finance and shall be posted on the Successor Agency’s internet website;
WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1)(A) of the Dissolution Law, the Successor Agency shall submit a copy of the Oversight Board-approved ROPS 26-27 to the Department of Finance in the manner provided by the Department of Finance; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34183(a)(2) of the Dissolution Law, the County Auditor-Controller is required to make a payment of property tax revenues (i.e. former tax increment funds) from the RPTTF to the Successor Agency on June 1, 2026 and January 4, 2027 for payments to be made toward recognized obligations listed on the ROPS 26-27 and approved by the Department of Finance;
WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 26-27 is consistent with the requirements of the H&S Code and other applicable law;
WHEREAS, the proposed ROPS 26-27 contains the schedules for payments on enforceable obligations required for the applicable fiscal year period and sources of funds for payments as required pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(l) of the Dissolution Law; WHEREAS, pursuant to H&S Code Section 34177(o)(1) of the Dissolution Law, the ROPS 26-27 as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board shall be submitted to the Department of Finance and the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2026.

Section 34177(o)(1) further provides that the Department of Finance shall make its determination of the enforceable obligations and the amounts and funding sources of the enforceable obligations no later than April 15, 2026 and that the Successor Agency may, within five (5) business days of the Department of Finance’s determination, request additional review by the Department of Finance and an opportunity to meet and confer on disputed items. In the event of a meet and confer and request for additional review, the Department of Finance shall notify the Successor Agency and the County Auditor-Controller as to the outcome of its review at least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of the first property tax distribution for that period (i.e. before June 1, 2026); and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency as follows:

Section 1. The Successor Agency determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Successor Agency approves and adopts the ROPS 26-27 for the 12- month fiscal year period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, in substantially the form presented to the Successor Agency at this meeting.

Section 3. The Executive Director, or designee, of the Successor Agency is authorized and directed to: (i) provide the ROPS 26-27 to the Oversight Board for review,

4 approval, and adoption and concurrently submit a copy of the ROPS 26-27 to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, and the Department of Finance; (ii) submit the ROPS 26-27, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the Department of Finance and to the County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2026; (iii) submit a copy of the ROPS 26-27, as approved and adopted by the Oversight Board, to the State Controller’s Office and post the ROPS 26-27 on the Successor Agency’s internet website; (iv) revise the ROPS 26-27, and make such changes and amendments as necessary, before official submittal of the ROPS 26-27 to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance in order to complete the ROPS 26-27 in the manner provided by the Department of Finance and to conform the ROPS 26-27 to the form or format as prescribed by the Department of Finance; (v) make other non-substantive changes and amendments to the ROPS 26-27 as may be approved by the Executive Director of the Successor Agency and its legal counsel; and (vi) take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution on behalf of the Successor Agency.

Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

Section 5. The adoption of this Resolution is not intended to and shall not constitute a waiver by the Successor Agency of any constitutional, legal or equitable rights that the Successor Agency may have to challenge, through any administrative or judicial proceedings, the effectiveness and/or legality of all or any portion of the Dissolution Law, any determinations rendered or actions or omissions to act by any public agency or government entity or division in the implementation of the Dissolution Law, and any and all related legal and factual issues, and the Successor Agency expressly reserves any and all rights, privileges, and defenses available under law and equity.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency held on the 9
th day of December 2025, by the following
vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

5 CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025-xxx SA, duly passed and adopted by the Successor Agency to the La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, Secretary
(SEAL OF CITY)

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Period Successor Agency: La Mesa
County: San Diego
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
26-27A Total
(July -
December)
26-27B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 26-27
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 1,181,234 $ 33,000 $ 1,214,234 F RPTTF 1,171,784 23,550 1,195,334
G Administrative RPTTF 9,450 9,450 18,900
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,181,234 $ 33,000 $ 1,214,234 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
26-27
Total
ROPS 26-27A (Jul - Dec)
26-27A
Total
ROPS 26-27B (Jan - Jun)
26-27B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
$2,683,225 $1,214,234 $- $- $- $1,171,784 $9,450 $1,181,234 $- $- $- $23,550 $9,450 $33,000 5 Police Station
Site Loan
Repayment
per HSC
34191.4(b)
City/County
Loan (Prior
06/28/11),
Property
transaction
11/25/
2008
06/30/2040 City of La
Mesa
Police Station
Land Purchase
-Enforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34191.4(b); OB
Resolution No.

OB 2017-04
finding loan
was made for
legitimate
redevelopment
purposes and
approving
repayment
Fletcher
Pkwy
2,617,225 N $1,148,234 - - - 1,148,234 - $1,148,234 - - - - - $- 15 Administrative
Cost
Allowance
Admin
Costs
07/01/
2025
06/30/2026 Various Administrative
Cost
Allowance
under AB1X26
- See
Oversight
Board
Resolution
approving the
Administrative
Budget and
Administrative
Cost
Allowance
n/a 18,900 N $18,900 - - - - 9,450 $9,450 - - - - 9,450 $9,450 17 Defense of
Affordable
Housing
Coalition
Lawsuit
Litigation 07/30/
2013
06/30/2026 Kane,
Ballmer &
Berkman/
SA
Legal Defense
of Affordable
Housing
Coalition's
lawsuitEnforceable
Obligation per
HSC 34171(b)
and
34171(d)(1)(F)
Central/
Fletcher/
Alvarado
Creek
40,000 N $40,000 - - - 20,000 - $20,000 - - - 20,000 - $20,000 21 Contract for
Auditing
Professional
Services
05/23/
2016
06/30/2026 Rogers,
Anderson,
Auditing
ServicesCentral/Fletcher/
7,100 N $7,100 - - - 3,550 - $3,550 - - - 3,550 - $3,550

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
26-27
Total
ROPS 26-27A (Jul - Dec)
26-27A
Total
ROPS 26-27B (Jan - Jun)
26-27B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
Services Malody &
Scott
Enforceable
Obligation per
HSC
34171(d)(1)(C),
34177(n) and
34171(d)(1)(F)
Alvarado
Creek

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 23-24 Cash Balances
(07/01/23 - 06/30/24)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/23)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/24)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 23-24 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
647,274 G2: ROPS 23-24A/B RPTTF Distributions per
DOF Determination letter March 24, 2023 and
paid by County Aud/contrlr
3 Expenditures for ROPS 23-24 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/24)
613,524 G3: Expenditures per expenditure report for
FY 2023-2024.
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/24) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
5 ROPS 23-24 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 23-24 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required -
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/24)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $- $- $33,750

La Mesa
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Notes July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027
Item # Notes/Comments
5 On 12/7/17, OB approved Reso 2017-04, (i) finding per Section 34191.4(b)(1) that City's seller carryback loan provided to former RDA was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; (ii) approving the loan as an EO of SA; (iii) approving repayment of remaining principal balance of $6M of original Purchase Price from RPTTF as an EO to be listed on successive ROPS; and (iv) authorizing SA Exec Dir to include repayment on successive ROPS until the loan is repaid in full. On 1/23/18, DOF letter approved the loan and repayment of loan on the ROPS in outstanding principal balance of $5.3M. For ROPS 25-26, Item A-5, SA estimates the permissible RPTTF payment of $1,148,234, calculated per Section 34191.4(b) as the 50% increase in residual RPTTF paid to ATE's in FY2012-2013 of $2,083,973 and estimated to be paid to ATE's in current year 2025-2026 of $4,380,440. 15 17 Funds required for defense of the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County v. City of La Mesa as Successor Agency to La Mesa Community Redevelopment Agency et al. Litigation costs due to the filing of a lawsuit by the Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County against several successor agencies alleging that unmet obligations of the former RDA pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA payable from RPTTF.

Costs relating to potential and pending litigation in connection with assets or obligations constitute an enforceable obligation of the SA and shall be payable from RPTTF funds, not as an administrative cost, pursuant to HSC Section 34171(b) and 34171(d)(1)(F) of the Dissolution Law. 21 Audit fees for FY2023-2024 have not yet been invoiced as of November 24, 2026. In documenting the PPA for FY2023-2024, the $3,350 was recaptured. The current request for fees includes $3,550 for FY 2023-2024 audit expenses as well as current year audit expenses of $3,550 for a total of $7,100.