LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting of the City Council
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2026, 6:00 p.m.
Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:
Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.gov), the City's YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/cityoflamesa) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:
The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:
Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.
Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however, any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot be combined or yielded to another speaker. *Live Remote Public Comment ONLY permitted during Councilmember teleconferencing pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953 (AB 2449).
*Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.
Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Human Resources Department 48 business hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].
Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo ID or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.
Pages
1. CALL TO ORDER
1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER DILLARD
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. PRESENTATIONS
5.1 CITY TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT 1
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.
If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.
7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
8. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
8.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND/OR REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE CITY’S COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
9 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:
The Mayor appoint and/or reappoint members to fill the openings on the City’s Community Police Oversight Board, with the approval of the City Council, and the City Council adopt the Resolution confirming the appointments and/or reappointments.
8.2 RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE
UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
14 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:
The City Council appoint a member to fill the vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission and adopt the Resolution confirming the appointment.
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.11)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 10.5).
Recommended Motion:
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.11.
10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT
OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2026
18 Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.3 2026 BOARD AND COMMISSION WORK PLANS 27
• ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
• COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND VETERANS COMMISSION
• ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
• MOBILITY COMMISSION
• PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
• YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file.
10.4 ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY OF LA MESA INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
40 Reference: City Treasurer Strabone
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.5 *APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
REPEALING LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (LMMC) CHAPTER 18.18 –
SIDEWALK CAFES
67 Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
10.6 PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY QUARTERLY REPORT
(OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
70 Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file.
10.7 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (HOME)
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 – DECEMBER
2025)
74 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file.
10.8 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
87 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file.
10.9 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
RESOLUTIONS
90 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET
AND HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT AND AWARDING A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT INCLUDING THE EL
PASO/DALHART ROUNDABOUT BID ALTERNATE TO
MIRAMAR GENERAL ENGINEERING
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA
GROUP, INC., FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET
AND HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
c. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., FOR TRAFFIC
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
d. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO PARSONS
TRANSPORTATION GROUP FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION
SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.10 RESOLUTION AMENDING SECTION 12.44.130 OF THE LA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE INSTALLING A DISABLED PERSONS PARKING
SPACE AT 8855 FABIENNE WAY
120
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
10.11 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., TO PROVIDE AS-NEEDED
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE
HELIX WATER DISTRICT PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
(CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 21002)
125
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
11. COUNCIL INITIATED
11.1 ADVOCACY LETTERS REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION 133
CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO DRAFT ADVOCACY
LETTERS TO STATE LEGISLATORS AND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA
CITIES (CAL CITIES) REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO
STRENGTHEN STATEWIDE REGULATION, OVERSIGHT, AND
ENFORCEMENT FOR LICENSED AND UNLICENSED SOBER LIVING
FACILITIES AND RESIDENTIAL DETOX FACILITIES (2025-2026
LEGISLATIVE SESSION) – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND
COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN
11.2 REAFFIRMING COMMITMENT TO THE CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
134
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING
THE CITY COUNCIL’S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY OF LA MESA
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS, INCLUDING SAFE COMMUNITY,
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY, LIVABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND
AMENITIES, AND HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, WHICH
GUIDE CITY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND LEGISLATIVE
ADVOCACY EFFORTS – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND
COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN
12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
13. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
14. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
15. ADJOURNMENT
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending
December 31, 2025
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Finance Department – City Treasurer
SUMMARY
PORTFOLIO VALUE:
The City’s portfolio ended the quarter with a market value of $73,914,137. This represents a discount of $204,665 from par value, or purchase price. As the City maintains an Investment Policy that follows a strict “buy and hold” strategy, there is no economic gain or loss upon call or maturity. The City’s securities continue to earn interest at the stated rates through the dates of redemption.
LIQUIDITY:
Liquidity meets the statutory requirements with $36,949,802 in LAIF for immediate availability. “LAIF” stands for Local Agency Investment Fund, and is operated by the California State Treasurer to act as an immediate-access account for local governments and special districts in California.
EARNINGS:
Investment earnings from the invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit, but excluding LAIF, for the current quarter collected from October 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, total $215,836, which represents an annualized rate of 2.32%. Investment earnings from LAIF for the current quarter total $344,262, which represents an annualized rate of 3.73%. Combined, investment earnings were $560,098, representing a total annualized rate of return of 3.02% for this quarter.
Please note that this represents interest payments and dividends actually earned by the City during the quarter, and may not necessarily reflect all interest payments and dividends payable to the City for the current quarter, nor be representative of future quarterly performance, due to differing payment schedules and variable interest rates.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 2 of 5
City’s Strategic Goal
To maintain a financially sound and affordable
city government
SAFETY
Federal Agencies
Carry the implied guarantee of the United States government Corporate Securities
The City’s Investment Policy requires ratings of Double A (AA) or better Certificates of Deposit
Guaranteed by the FDIC to $250,000
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Managed by the California State Treasurer; consists primarily of U.S. Treasuries, government agency bonds, and other short-term investments.
LIQUIDITY
The City’s LAIF balance of $36,949,802 represents the City’s immediate cash and is 49.9% of the portfolio. Additionally, as investments mature, they can be reinvested at then-current rates or redeemed to provide additional operating cash. The invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit has an average maturity of 1 year and 4 months with $19,977,000 maturing within one year for added liquidity.
EARNINGS
As noted above, the City’s portfolio earned $560,098 this quarter, representing an annualized yield of 3.02%.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 3 of 5
PORTFOLIO PROFILE
To achieve the City’s strategic goal, the City’s primary investment objectives, in order of priority, are: Safety, Liquidity, and Earnings. Key to each of these objectives is a well-diversified portfolio that minimizes credit and interest rate risk and provides necessary liquidity. The City’s portfolio is designed to meet these objectives as summarized in the following table which is presented at par values. This table represents the City’s holdings as of December 31, 2025:
Years to
Maturity
Government
Agencies
Corporate
Securities
Certificates
of Deposit LAIF Totals %of Portfolio
Interest
Rate
0 – 1 16,000,000 1,000,000 2,977,000 36,949,802 56,926,802 76.80% 1.32%*
1 – 2 7,000,000 0 3,958,000 - 10,958,000 14.78% 2.97%
2 – 3 0 0 1,984,000 - 1,984,000 2.68% 4.51%
3 – 4 1,250,000 0 0 - 1,250,000 1.69% 4.16%
4 – 5 3,000,000 0 0 - 3,000,000 4.05% 4.88%
Totals 27,250,000 1,000,000 8,919,000 36,949,802 74,118,802 100.00% Portfolio % 36.77% 1.35% 12.03% 49.85% 100.00%
Interest
Rate 2.04% 0.70% 3.53% 4.20% 3.28%
*Interest rate for assets with 0-1 years to maturity excludes LAIF
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 4 of 5
PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
During the quarter, two federal agency bonds were called. No other holdings in the City’s portfolio matured, were called, or were purchased.
Federal Agencies Called: Maturity Rate Par Value
FNMA 4 year 4.50% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 4.00% $1,000,000
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 5 of 5
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE
The portfolio complies with California code sections concerning safety and liquidity in the investment of public funds. Investment strategies are based on liquidity requirements and interest rate projections and have been collaboratively determined by the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance. The City Treasurer executes trades in accordance with these strategies.
Required Contents of Investment Reports
California Government Code Section 53646(b) suggests that the quarterly investment report of a local agency contain certain items. These items include the type of investment, the issuer’s name, the date of maturity of the security, the par amount of the instrument, the market value, and the dollar amount invested in each security. The source of the market value also should be included in the report. The report also must reference all funds that are under the management of external investment providers, such as investment advisors and investment managers. A local government’s quarterly report, if submitted, must state the portfolio’s compliance with the agency’s investment policy or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance. Finally, the investment report must include a statement regarding the local agency’s ability to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months.
Accordingly, I advise you of the following facts in compliance with Government Code Section 53646(b):
1. The source of the valuations included herein is U.S. Bank, Saint Paul, MN 55107.
2. No funds are under the management of external providers or managers. Investment decisions are made by a consensus of the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance.
3. The City’s portfolio remains in strict compliance with the Investment Policy of the City of La Mesa for FY 2025-2026.
4. The City of La Mesa’s investment portfolio more than adequately assures the City’s ability to meet its cash flow needs during the ensuing six months.
Reviewed by Respectfully submitted by
___________________________ ___________________________ Greg Humora Matt Strabone
City Manager City Treasurer
Attachments:
A - Schedule of Investments – Summary
B - Schedule of Investments – Detail
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments (Summary)
As of December 31, 2025
Issuer Type of Investment Maturity Date Par Value Book Value Market Value State of California LAIF 98-37-421 Demand 36,949,802 36,949,802 37,030,407 Federal Agencies U.S. Agency Obligations 02/2026 - 03/2030 27,250,000 27,248,500 26,947,310 Financial/Banking Institutions Certificates of Deposit 04/2026 - 09/2028 8,919,000 8,919,000 8,939,250 Corporate Obligations Medium Term Notes 01/2026 - 02/2026 1,000,000 992,425 997,170 Total 74,118,802 74,109,727 73,914,137
I certify that the investment of funds is in conformance with California Government Code section 53600. Those investments valued at below market cost will be held until maturity or until they can be sold without a loss. I also certify that the investment of funds provides the cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's estimated expenditure requirements.
Matt Strabone, City Treasurer
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, December 31, 2025
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 89235MKY6 TOYOTA FINL C D 0.900% 4/22/26 04/22/2021 04/22/2026 0.90% 248,000.00 248,000.00 245,812.64 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 02007GQQ9 ALLY BK UT C D 2.850% 5/05/26 05/02/2022 05/05/2026 2.85% 246,000.00 246,000.00 245,230.02 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 90348JQ29 UBS BK USA SALT C D 0.900% 7/14/26 07/14/2021 07/14/2026 0.90% 249,000.00 249,000.00 245,384.52 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 30960QAS6 FARMERS INS C D 5.100% 7/27/26 07/26/2023 07/27/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,063.36 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 16141BAH4 CHARTWAY FED C D 5.250% 7/28/26 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,284.08 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 68584JAG4 OREGON CMNTY CR C D 5.100% 7/28/26 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,073.28 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 37424PAH7 GESA CR UN C D 5.250% 7/31/26 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,346.08 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 67054NBL6 NUMERICA CR UN C D 5.200% 7/31/26 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.20% 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,274.16 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 32022RSC2 FIRST FINL BK C D 3.250% 8/03/26801/2022 08/03/2026 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,482.08 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 70962LAE2 PENTAGON C D 0.850% 9/01/26901/2021 09/01/2026 0.85% 249,000.00 249,000.00 244,493.10 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 14042RQB0 CAPITAL ONE NATL C D 1.100% 11/17/26 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 242,715.12 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 14042TDW4 CAPITAL ONE BANK C D 1.100% 11/17/26 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 242,715.12 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 07371CE88 BEAL BK USA C D 1.900% 2/17/27 023/2022 02/17/2027 1.90% 247,000.00 247,000.00 242,381.10 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 02589ABQ4 AMERICAN EXPRESS C D 2.000% 3/09/27 03/09/2022 03/09/2027 2.00% 247,000.00 247,000.00 242,415.68 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 06740KPK7 BARCLAYS BK DEL C D 2.650% 4/13/27 04/13/2022 04/13/2027 2.65% 246,000.00 246,000.00 243,003.72 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 58404DPC9 MEDALLION BK C D 3.200% 5/24/27 05/24/2022 05/24/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,528.41 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 20825WAX8 CONNEXUS CR UN C D 3.100% 5/26/27 05/26/2022 05/26/2027 3.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,222.14 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 90352RCN3 USALLIANCE FCU C D 3.300% 5/28/27 05/31/2022 05/28/2027 3.30% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,874.52 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 50625LBN2 LAFAYETTE FED C D 3.250% 6/15/27 06/15/2022 06/15/2027 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,618.05 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 88413QDL9 THIRD FED SVGS C D 3.500% 6/28/27 06/28/2022 06/28/2027 3.50% 245,000.00 245,000.00 244,461.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 254673L38 DISCOVER BK C D 3.400% 7/06/27 07/06/2022 07/06/2027 3.40% 245,000.00 245,000.00 244,042.05 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 32026UU20 FIRST FNDTN BK C D 4.600% 7/19/27 07/19/2023 07/19/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 247,355.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 307811EM7 FARMERS C D 3.200% 8/05/27 08/05/2022 08/05/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,237.08 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 08016PEH8 BELMONT BK TR C D 3.150% 8/24/27 08/24/2022 08/24/2027 3.15% 249,000.00 249,000.00 246,958.20 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 19075JAB4 COBALT FED CR C D 3.600% 9/15/27 09/15/2022 09/15/2027 3.60% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,733.57 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 052392BT3 AUSTIN TELCO C D 3.800% 9/21/27 09/21/2022 09/21/2027 3.80% 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,527.88 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 87164YT95 SYNCHRONY C D 4.600% 10/28/27 10/28/2022 10/28/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 247,864.96 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 25460FDW3 DIRECT FED CR C D 4.800% 11/08/27 11/07/2022 11/08/2027 4.80% 248,000.00 248,000.00 252,960.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 61690U5K2 MORGAN STANLEY C D 4.450% 5/03/28 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.45% 244,000.00 244,000.00 247,879.60 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 804767AB7 SAVANNAH BK C D 4.100% 5/03/28 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 251,049.27 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK C D 4.100% 5/05/28 05/05/2023 05/05/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 251,051.76 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 92834ABT2 VISIONBANK ST C D 4.050% 5/12/28 05/12/2023 05/12/2028 4.05% 249,000.00 249,000.00 250,777.86 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 05765LBU0 BALBOA THRIFT C D 4.400% 7/19/28 07/19/2023 07/19/2028 4.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 258,038.70 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 89854LAD5 TTCU FED CR UN C D 5.000% 7/26/28 07/26/2023 07/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 255,583.84 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 898812AC6 TUCSON FED CR C D 5.000% 9/08/28 09/08/2023 09/08/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 255,849.20 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 39573LEM6 GREENSTATE CR UN C D 5.000% 9/26/28 09/26/2023 09/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 255,963.28 Subtotal: 8,919,000.00 8,919,000.00 8,939,250.43
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value CORPORATE BONDS 46632FRU1 JPMORGAN CHASE MTN 0.700% 1/22/26 01/22/2021 01/22/2026 0.70% 500,000.00 500,000.00 498,750.00 CORPORATE BONDS 037833EB2 APPLE INC 0.700% 2/08/2602/08/2021 02/08/2026 0.70% 500,000.00 492,425.00 498,420.00 Subtotal: 1,000,000.00 992,425.00 997,170.00
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, December 31, 2025
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value US AGENCIES 3130ALD76 F H L B DEB 0.700% 2/25/2602/25/2021 02/25/2026 0.70% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 995,640.00 US AGENCIES 3130ALGB4 F H L B DEB 0.800% 3/17/2603/17/2021 03/17/2026 0.80% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 994,290.00 US AGENCIES 3130ALMM3 F H L B DEB 1.000% 3/30/2603/30/2021 03/30/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,770.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMDY5 F H L B DEB 1.000% 5/20/2605/20/2021 05/20/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 989,210.00 US AGENCIES 3133EMH21 F F C B DEB 0.900% 6/15/2606/12/2021 06/15/2026 0.90% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,930.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMPT3 F H L B DEB 1.030% 6/23/260/23/2021 06/23/2026 1.03% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,980.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMWX6 F H L B DEB 1.020% 6/30/260/30/2021 06/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,560.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANHW3 F H L B DEB 0.930% 8/25/2607/29/2021 08/25/2026 0.93% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 982,720.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANSB7 F H L B DEB 1.000% 9/17/2609/17/2021 09/17/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 981,760.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANYR5 F H L B DEB 0.950% 9/30/2609/30/2021 09/30/2026 0.95% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 980,970.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6M2 F H L B DEB 1.020% 9/30/2609/30/2021 09/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 981,150.00 US AGENCIES 3130APB87 F H L B DEB 1.100% 10/13/26 10/13/2021 10/13/2026 1.10% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 980,850.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6U4 F H L B DEB 1.000% 10/14/26 10/14/2021 10/14/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 979,460.00 US AGENCIES 3130APDQ5 F H L B DEB 1.250% 10/28/26 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.25% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 981,210.00 US AGENCIES 3130APL78 F H L B DEB 1.375% 10/28/26 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.38% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 982,510.00 US AGENCIES 3130APQA6 F H L B DEB 1.400% 11/24/26 11/24/2021 11/24/2026 1.40% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 980,810.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQUD3 F H L B DEB 2.010% 2/25/2702/25/2022 02/25/2027 2.01% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 982,510.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQZ55 F H L B DEB 2.500% 3/10/2703/10/2022 03/10/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,650.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARAH4 F H L B DEB 2.350% 3/29/2703/04/2022 03/29/2027 2.35% 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 985,050.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARDY4 F H L B DEB 2.500% 3/29/2703/29/2022 03/29/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,160.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARGE5 F H L B DEB 3.000% 4/21/2704/21/2022 04/21/2027 3.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,130.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARW56 F H L B DEB 3.650% 5/12/2705/12/2022 05/12/2027 3.65% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,930.00 US AGENCIES 3130AS7J2 F H L B DEB 3.200% 6/10/2706/10/2022 06/10/2027 3.20% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 995,110.00 US AGENCIES 3135GAU25 F N M A DEB 4.375% 8/06/29 08/06/2024 08/06/2029 4.38% 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,780.00 US AGENCIES 3130B2K95 F H L B DEB 4.100% 8/28/2908/30/2024 08/28/2029 4.10% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 999,270.00 US AGENCIES 3130B5AM0 F H L B DEB 4.900% 2/27/3002/27/2025 02/27/2030 4.90% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,150.00 US AGENCIES 31424WVS8 F A M C M T N 4.980% 2/27/30 02/27/2025 02/27/2030 4.98% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,200.00 US AGENCIES 3136GACF4 F N M A M T N 4.750% 3/05/30 03/05/2025 03/05/2030 4.75% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,001,550.00 Subtotal: 27,250,000.00 27,248,500.00 26,947,310.00
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value Demand 98-37-421 LAIF State of California 4.20% 36,949,801.62 36,949,801.62 37,030,406.98 Grand Total: 74,118,801.62 74,109,726.62 73,914,137.41
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND/OR REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE CITY’S COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
On January 27, the City Council interviewed applicants interested in appointment or reappointment to the City’s Community Police Oversight Board (CPOB). At the February 10 Council meeting, the Mayor will make appointments to the CPOB, subject to City Council approval.
There are five Board Member seats currently open for appointment or reappointment.
The openings are for the following seats:
Police Beat 1
Police Beat 2
Police Beat 3
Police Beat 4
Advocate for People Experiencing Homelessness, Substance Abuse, Mental Health, or Other Social Issues
Applications from individuals seeking appointment or reappointment to the CPOB are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. Attached is a matrix identifying the categories for which each applicant is eligible.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Mayor appoint and/or reappoint members to fill the openings on the City’s Community Police Oversight Board, with the approval of the Council, and that the Council adopt the attached resolution confirming the appointments and/or reappointments.
Attachments
A. Draft Resolution
B. Applicant Matrix
APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPOINTING AND/OR REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE CITY’S COMMUNITY POLICE
OVERSIGHT BOARD
___________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, terms on the City of La Mesa Community Police Oversight Board have either expired or been vacated; and
WHEREAS, the list of persons below has been recommended to the City Council for appointment to said City of La Mesa Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the following are hereby appointed and/or reappointed as members of the City of La Mesa Community Police Oversight Board, with their terms to commence after the oath or affirmation of allegiance for public officers or employees is executed as required by Article XX, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California, and to expire on the dates stated below, or until their successors are appointed and qualified:
Community Police Oversight Board: 5 appointments
(Name) is appointed/reappointed as the Police Beat 1 representative for term ending December 31, 2027.
(Name) is appointed as the Police Beat 2 representative for term ending December 31, 2027.
(Name) is appointed/reappointed as the Police Beat 3 representative for term ending December 31, 2027.
(Name) is appointed/reappointed as the Police Beat 4 representative for term ending December 31, 2027.
(Name) is appointed/reappointed as the Advocate for People Experiencing Homelessness, Substance Abuse, Mental Health, or Other Social Issues representative for term ending December 31, 2027.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Police Beat 1 Police Beat 2 Police Beat 3 Police Beat 4 Advocate for People Experiencing Homelessness
Aaron Landau Bonnie Baranoff Clifton Ewbank Todd McCully Bonnie Baranoff Jeffrey McIllwain Elizabeth Morgante Clifton Ewbank
Alexandra Metz Aaron Landau
Susan Reeder Alexandra Metz
Susan Reeder
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE UNSCHEDULED
VACANCY ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Currently, there is an unscheduled vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Interviews were conducted at the City Council meeting on January 27, 2026.
Nomination forms for the appointment will be distributed at the meeting. Each Councilmember will indicate their nomination on the form, after which the forms will be provided to the City Clerk, who will read each nomination aloud. The nomination process will continue until a majority nomination of the Council is achieved.
Attached is a brief description outlining the position requirements, the number of openings, and the names of the applicants seeking appointment.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint a member to fill the vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission and adopt the attached resolution confirming the appointment.
Attachments
A. Draft Resolution
B. List of Applicants
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPOINTING
A MEMBER TO FILL THE UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
___________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, a position on the City of La Mesa Parks and Recreation Commission has been vacated; and
WHEREAS, the person below has been elected by the City Council for appointment to said City of La Mesa Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the following is hereby appointed as a member of the City of La Mesa Parks and Recreation Commission, with their term to commence after the oath or affirmation of allegiance for public officers or employees is executed as required by Article XX, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California, and to expire on the date stated below, or until their successor is appointed and qualified:
Parks and Recreation Commission: 1 appointment
(Name) is appointed to fill the unscheduled vacancy with term expiring June 30, 2028.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Parks and Recreation Commission: One (1) position – four-year term • One appointee will fill the vacancy with term expiring June 30, 2028.
Members shall be resident electors of City of La Mesa and are subject to the Conflict of Interest Code. One appointee shall be nominated by the Grossmont Union High School District.
First Appointed Number of Terms
Jonathan Austin
Cherie Meek
Jason Molen
THE APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
1 La Mesa City Council
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Location:
January 27, 2026, 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items may be taken out of order during the meeting.
The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.
Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council, and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.
4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
2 There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.
5. PRESENTATIONS
5.1 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN PROGRESS REPORT PRESENTATION
Environmental Manager Ego, Environmental Program Coordinator Lee, and CivicSpark Fellows Clio Goodwin and Maya Feldman-Dragich presented the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) Progress Report, noting the CAP was adopted in 2018 and updated in 2024 as a roadmap to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while providing community co-benefits.
The report highlighted recent outreach and engagement efforts, youth and staff education, and implementation activities across clean energy, building efficiency, transportation, water conservation, waste reduction, and urban forestry, including tree giveaways and expansion of EV charging and solar at City facilities. Staff also referenced regional greenhouse gas inventory data and ongoing coordination with partner agencies and community organizations. Staff stated that, looking ahead to 2026, the City would focus on initiatives such as the Home Energy Fair, Extreme Heat Action Plan, EV Charging Station Master Plan, additional clean-up events, and pursuing grant funding to support CAP programs.
Council questions and comments ensued.
5.2 PRESENTATION OF THE PUBLIC PARTNER OF THE YEAR AWARD
TO THE CITY OF LA MESA BY THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY BICYCLE
COALITION
Executive Director Chloe Lauer of the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition presented Mayor Arapostathis, on behalf of the City of La Mesa, with the Partner of the Year Award and highlighted the City’s efforts and accomplishments that led to the recognition.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Russ Buckley spoke about the Challenge Center.
7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.
8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS
8.1 ANNUAL INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR OPENINGS ON THE
CITY’S COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
City Clerk Wiegelman briefly explained the interview process.
3 The following applicants spoke regarding their qualifications and interest in being appointed or reappointed to the Community Police Oversight Board:
Bonnie Baranoff
Clifton Ewbank
Aaron Landau
Todd McCully
Jeffrey McIllwain
Elizabeth Morgante
Susan Reeder
City Clerk Wiegelman said the appointments would be made at the February 10 City Council meeting.
8.2 INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR THE UNSCHEDULED VACANCY
ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
City Clerk Wiegelman briefly explained the interview process.
The following applicants spoke regarding their qualifications and interest in being appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission:
Jonathan Austin
Cherie Meek
Jason Molen
City Clerk Wiegelman said the appointment would be made at the February 10 City Council meeting.
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no comments on Consent Calendar items.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.6)
Vice Mayor Cazares made comments on Item 10.3.
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Cazares
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.6.
4 For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.
10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2026
Approve.
10.3 ACCEPTANCE OF THE SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERALLY ASSISTED GRANT PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2024
Approve.
10.4 LA MESA PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT
APPLICATION
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT
APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
(OTS) GRANT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR
THE LA MESA PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM AND
IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE
PROJECT
Resolution No. 2026-005
Adopt Resolution.
10.5 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH AXON
ENTERPRISE, INC. FOR AXON PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Resolution No. 2026-006
Adopt Resolution.
10.6 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH CCS FACILITY
SERVICES FOR JANITORIAL AND CUSTODIAL SERVICES FOR CITY
FACILITIES
Resolution No. 2026-007
Adopt Resolution.
5 11. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING
11.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA MESA REPEALING LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 18.18 - SIDEWALK CAFES
Director of Community Development Santos presented the proposed ordinance to repeal La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 18.18 (Sidewalk Cafes) and outlined the distinction between existing sidewalk cafe and outdoor dining regulations, including the temporary flexibility that had been granted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the update was to streamline the process for outdoor dining, activate commercial frontages, support economic development, and maintain clear pedestrian paths.
City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Cazares
Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.
For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
12. STAFF REPORTS
12.1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY FOR
SIDEWALK DINING IN COMMERCIAL ZONES
Senior Planner Merker presented the proposed Sidewalk Dining Policy, outlining goals to streamline permitting, activate commercial frontages, support economic development, and maintain accessible paths of travel.
She summarized outreach efforts, key policy components, and updated standards addressing location eligibility, permit process and renewals, fencing, furniture, tree protections, accessibility clearances, and hours of operation. Senior Planner Merker also reviewed implementation timelines and transition provisions for existing operators, including temporary permits and compliance deadlines.
Council questions and comments ensued.
6 The following members of the public spoke in support of the proposed Sidewalk Dining Policy, subject to amendments to specific sections:
Gerald Torres
Mark Hunter
Tony Gaipa
Brenda Leek
Alberto Morreale
Council questions and comments continued.
Resolution No. 2026-008
Moved By Vice Mayor Cazares
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
(1) Adopt the Resolution adopting a policy for sidewalk dining in commercial zones, with Sections 7, 9, and 10 of the policy amended to read as follows:
Section 7: The Sidewalk Dining Permit shall expire three (3) years from the date of issuance and may be renewed for successive three-year terms. Permits shall be automatically renewed administratively unless the permittee has incurred multiple significant violations, as determined by the City, of applicable permit conditions or municipal regulations.
In the event of such violations, the City shall provide written notice of infraction to the permittee within fourteen (14) business days of receipt of a complaint. The permittee shall be afforded thirty (30) days to correct the identified violations prior to the permit’s expiration date, except where the nature of the violation poses an immediate threat to public health or safety.
If the permit expires and is not renewed within thirty (30) days following the expiration date, all sidewalk dining furniture and equipment shall be removed in its entirety from the public right-of-way by the permittee.
Section 9: Any Sidewalk Dining Permit may be terminated for the City’s convenience at any time, upon ninety (90) days’ prior written notice, by the sole determination of a vote of the City Council.
Section 10: Sidewalk dining hours shall coincide with the operating hours of the associated food or beverage establishment. Beginning at 10:00 p.m., no additional patrons shall be seated in sidewalk dining areas.
7 Patrons seated prior to 10:00 p.m. may remain until their dining service is complete. All sidewalk dining furniture and appurtenances shall be removed from the public right-of-way within one (1) hour of the establishment’s closing time.
(2) Direct City staff, within sixty (60) days of adoption, to publicly publish a detailed and transparent process outlining: (a) how violations are reported and addressed; and (b) the process by which businesses may appeal enforcement actions or permit termination decisions.
For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
13. COUNCIL INITIATED
13.1 ELECTRIC MICROMOBILITY VEHICLES (E-BIKES) ORDINANCE
CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING RULES GOVERNING THE USE OF E-BIKES WITHIN
THE CITY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
RIDERS OF E-BIKES AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC -
COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
Councilmember Suzuki explained the purpose of requesting that the Council direct staff to draft an ordinance establishing rules governing the use of e-bikes within the City, emphasizing that the safety of residents and visitors is a top priority. She stated the current regulatory framework needs to be evaluated to ensure City policies adequately address community safety.
Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Mayor Arapostathis
Direct staff to draft an ordinance establishing rules governing the use of ebikes within the City to protect the health, safety, and welfare of riders of e-bikes and the general public.
For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
8 13.2 CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY BECOMING A MEMBER OF THE GovAI COALITION FOUNDED BY THE CITY OF SAN JOSE TO
ADVANCE RESPONSIBLE AND PURPOSEFUL ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE PRACTICES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR -
COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
Councilmember Suzuki explained the purpose of requesting Council approval for the City to become a member of the GovAI Coalition, a national network of public agencies promoting responsible and effective AI use in government. She noted the Coalition provides free resources such as NIST-aligned policy templates, procurement and vendor accountability tools, training, and opportunities for peer collaboration to support AI governance while addressing risks related to privacy, bias, and safety.
She stated that membership reflects La Mesa’s commitment to protecting residents’ privacy and civil rights while thoughtfully and responsibly leveraging AI to enhance public services.
Council questions and comments ensued.
Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Approve City membership in the GovAI Coalition, founded by the City of San Jose, to support the advancement of responsible and purposeful artificial intelligence practices in the public sector.
For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Approved (5 to 0)
14. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions, and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.
15. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
Councilmember Suzuki reported that she attended the League of California Cities Conference in Sacramento, California, from January 20–30, 2026, where she participated in the Governance, Transparency, and Labor Relations Committee meeting.
16. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
9 There were no remarks.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: BOARD AND COMMISSION WORK PLANS
At the start of each calendar year, the city’s Boards and Commissions meet to update their respective Work Plans. The Work Plans provide a roadmap for the major initiatives and projects each commission will work to achieve over the year.
Attachments:
A. Arts and Culture Commission
B. Community Relations and Veterans Commission
C. Environmental Sustainability Commission
D. Mobility Commission
E. Parks and Recreation Commission
F. Youth Advisory Commission
ATTACHMENT A
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Staffing Department: Community Services
GOALS DUE
DATE
TRACKING MILESTONES STATUS
1. Increase community
engagement and advocacy for
the arts through increased
public awareness and highvisibility events.
Ongoing Expand the Commission’s reach
by identifying new marketing
channels and establishing
collaborative partnerships
through active participation in
arts and culture events.
2. Seek out funding streams,
including grants to ensure the
long-term growth of arts and
culture in La Mesa.
Summer
2026
Create a draft support document
that can be adapted easily for
funding opportunities.
3. Contribute to the development
of the Arts and Culture Master
Plan to ensure alignment with
community goals.
December
2026
Assist with public outreach
efforts and ensure community
input is accurately captured for
the plan.
4. Support the administration and
execution of the Artist to Work
Program to enhance public art
within the community.
December
2026
Participate in the selection of
artists and promote engagement
through attendance and
promotion of ribbon-cutting
ceremonies.
5. Assist with the planning and
execution of a bimonthly event
series supported by the San
Diego ART Matters grant to
strengthen community arts
engagement in La Mesa.
December
2026
Support implementation of
bimonthly events and track
attendance data to measure the
impact of the capacity-building
initiatives.
Arts & Culture Commission
2.87.070 - Mission, duties and functions.
(a) The mission of the arts and culture commission is to promote the arts, along with the historical, aesthetic, and cultural aspects of the community by using the arts as a mechanism to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion.
(b) The commission shall have the following duties and functions:
(1) Serve in an advisory capacity to the city council on policies relating to public art; (2) Promote, encourage and increase support for the art; (3) Make recommendations on new ways to integrate arts and culture into community life; (4) Plan, participate in, and/or help sponsor events showcasing art throughout the city; (5) Consult and work with community organizations to coordinate activities of the commission.
ATTACHMENT B
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Staffing Department: Parks and Recreation
GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING
MILESTONES STATUS
1 Host speakers or events to
educate commission and
public about resources
related to veterans, seniors,
disabled and the community
at large.
Ongoing
Host minimum of (2)
presentations February
to December 2026.
Track attendance at
meetings.
Disseminate calendar
via social media.
2 Participate in Veteran Day
event November
Assist with or attend a
local Veterans Day
event.
3 Participate in City or
community events. Ongoing
Volunteer or have a
tabletop at community
events to increase
Commission’s visibility.
4 Recognize La Mesa citizens,
veterans, organizations and
businesses.
Ongoing
nominations,
monthly/quarterly
recognition
Accept, review and
present Good Neighbor
awards.
Recognize military
residents.
(a) The mission of the Community Relations and Veterans Commission is to address the needs and concerns of senior adults, the disabled, veterans, and the community-at-large, and develop activities which promote positive community relations in the city of La Mesa. (b) The commission shall have the following duties and functions:
(1) Provide a forum for discussion by the commission and the community on senior adult, disabled, veterans, and human relations issues;
(2) Plan, participate in, and/or help sponsor events dealing with senior adult, the disabled, veterans, and human relations issues, which promote positive relations within the community; and
COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND VETERANS COMMISSION
(3) Consult with other community organizations, senior groups, veteran-related associations, and organizations serving the disabled community to best coordinate the activities of the commission.
ATTACHMENT C
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Staffing Department: Public Works
GOALS DUE
DATE TRACKING MILESTONES STATUS
1 Support City
staff, boards
and
commissions
in the
implementati
on of actions
and
supporting
actions that
result in the
greatest
greenhouse
gas emission
reductions.
Ongoing
1.1. Support implementation of CAP Measure T-1:
a. Assist in the evaluation and identification of
sidewalk infrastructure improvements through
community outreach and advisement of Cityled projects or programs. b. Support the prioritization of pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure improvements identified
in the City's Bicycle Facilities and Alternative
Transportation Plan.
c. Support redesigning streets for bicycle
facilities and active transportation and
identifying bicycle parking locations at retail,
restaurants, housing, and employment
centers.
d. Develop driver and alternative transportation
education and events for adults and youth.
1.2. Assist in the development of programs and
partnerships that reduce vehicle miles traveled
and vehicle pollution, including:
a. Support the development of Transportation
Demand Management programs (e.g.,
first/last mile programs, NEVs) and policy
(Measure T-2).
b. Support staff coordination with local schools
and districts to improve safety and efficiency
of on-site transportation operations (Measure
T-7).
c. Receive and provide input on transportationrelated City projects.
In
Progress
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
d. Explore opportunities for the ESC to host or
partner with other organizations to create
bicycle valet services at events in the City.
1.3. Support education and pursuit of grant
opportunities and evaluation of infrastructure
priorities (Measure T-8).
1.4. Support increased adoption of EVs and usage -
especially for multi-family renters - through
projects such as EV charging infrastructure
development through the EV Charging Station
Master Plan working group, education and
outreach, and grant pursuits.
1.5. Support the development of education programs
and resources for residents and businesses to
increase renewable energy project installation
(Measure RE-2).
1.6. Support activities to increase electrification of
new and existing buildings (Measures BE-1 and
BE-2), including:
a. Develop and support educational workshops
for energy efficiency, weatherization, and
building efficiency standards.
b. Support the development of an existing
building and housing stock analysis.
c. Explore cost-effective citywide policies,
strategies, rebates, grants, and methods for
addressing equity to further decarbonize
existing building stock. (Measure BE-1).
2 Support City
staff in the
implementati
on of actions
and
supporting
actions that
promote
equitable
distribution
of City
resources
and cobenefits of
actions.
Ongoing
2.1. Support food waste reduction and food recovery
efforts (Measure WR-5), including:
a. Developing and distributing educational
materials.
b. Support identifying communities where food
recovery and local food access should be
prioritized.
2.2. Support research and development of single-use
plastic reduction policy and educational programs
(Measure WR-3).
2.3. Support programs that increase education and
awareness of urban forestry and encourage
native landscaping (Measure U-1.2), including:
a. Incorporate native plant and urban forestry
education into new or existing educational
programs (e.g., La Mesa Walks).
b. Support the development of a native planting
program.
In
Progress
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
2.4. Promote stormwater capture and reuse systems
for commercial and industrial properties to
enhance water conservation and reduce runoff.
2.5. Support the implementation of the Equity
Framework that is informed by best practice
research and identifies methods and priorities for
CAP implementation.
2.6. Develop programs that engage youth with
opportunities for climate action in the community.
(e.g. youth camp activities, classroom materials).
3 Support City
staff in
responding
to Council
direction and
guidance
related to the
CAP and
Climate
Emergency.
Ongoing
3.1. In response to the City’s declared Climate
Emergency (Resolution 2021-020 and Resolution
2022-010):
a. Support City staff in the development and
implementation of new and urgent GHG
reduction actions that go beyond existing
measures identified in the CAP.
b. Support and uplift actions that ensure a just
transition and incorporate climate adaptation
strategies.
3.2. Support City staff in development of updates to
the Council on CAP progress and
implementation.
3.3. Support City staff in identifying potential actions for consideration in future CAP updates.
3.4. Support continued City staff efforts to identify,
coordinate, and implement Climate Change
Adaptation Strategies, including extreme heat, as
identified in the CAP Update (Section 3.2)
In
Progress
ATTACHMENT D
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home. Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community
Staffing Department: Public Works Department – Traffic Engineering Section
GOALS DUE
DATE TRACKING MILESTONES STATUS
1. Continuation of the
Neighborhood Traffic Management
Program implementation and
program adjustments
Annual
a. Prepare and present draft
annual report to Mobility
Commission for approval
prior to City Council.
b. Staff to recommend program
adjustments as needed
Annual
Plan, May
2026
2a. Vision Zero policy
implementation and monitoring,
support with CAP measure T1
Annual
Work with staff to identify and
recommend potential Capital
Improvements Projects to City
Council for budgetary consideration
CIP
Presentation
in March
2026
2b. Climate Action Plan in support
of CAP Measure T1, T2, T7, RE-1,
and RE-2
Annual
Work with staff to identify and
recommend potential Capital
Improvements Projects to City
Council for budgetary consideration.
Mobility commission will be directed
to work with the Environmental
Sustainability Commission to better
support the CAP measures
Ongoing
2c. Transportation Demand
Management and Parking Demand
Management in support of CAP
Measure T3 and T4
Annual
Work with staff to develop
transportation demand management
and parking demand management
policies for City Council
consideration
Ongoing
3. Commissioners to attend
mobility related public meetings on
a rotating basis
Ongoing
Commissioners to continue to attend
public NTMP meetings in addition to
other traffic related public meetings
Ongoing
4. Commissioners to attend
continuing education as available
and/or provide updates at
meetings
Ongoing
Commissioners to continue to attend
continuing education opportunities
and coordinate with staff on other
educational opportunities as they
arise
Ongoing
ATTACHMENT E
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Staffing Department: Parks and Recreation
GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING
MILESTONES
STATUS
1. Inspect parks and submit
maintenance and program
related information via
Google Docs digital form.
March, June,
September and
December by the
9 th of the month.
Provide quarterly
feedback.
2. Promote and support City
initiatives.
Ongoing Actively assist in
dissemination of
information.
Participate in
community programs.
3. Court subcommittee January 2026 Subcommittee to make final recommendations
to Commission.
Ongoing court
oversight.
4. Support the completion of
the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan.
April 2026 Review and provide
feedback for the draft
plan.
Provide
recommendations to
City Council.
5. Assist in the completion of
the Collier Park Spring
House Reuse Plan.
March 2026 Review and provide
feedback for the draft
plan.
Parks and Recreation Commission
6. Assist in implementation of
the Waite Park Master
Plan.
June 2026 Provide input on
construction
documents.
7. Support the completion of
the MacArthur Park Master
Plan.
December 2026 Attend community
meetings.
Review and provide
feedback for the draft
plan.
Provide
recommendations to
City Council.
8. Assist in implementation of
the La Mesita Skate Park
Renovation.
December 2026 Provide input on design.
Support fundraising
efforts.
La Mesa Municipal Code:
2.32.110 - Duties generally.
The board shall provide for and do any other acts which may be found necessary and proper by it to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
2.32.120 - Recommendations—Land acquisition.
The commission may recommend to the city council and the planning commission the acquisition of lands for recreation and park purposes.
2.32.130 - Recommendations—Needs and policies.
The community services commission shall have the power and it shall be its duty to consider, advise or recommend to the city council:
(a) Need pertaining to the acquisition, development and use of facilities, buildings and structures for recreational and park purposes;
(b) Policies relating to the management, maintenance, control and improvement of facilities and land used for public recreational and park purposes within or without the corporate limits of the city.
2.32.140 - Recommendations—Ordinances and regulations.
The community services commission shall develop and recommend ordinances and resolutions necessary in the establishing of administrative rules and regulations as deemed proper to regulate and govern the use of recreational and park facilities.
2.32.150 - Recommendations—Budget.
The community services commission shall review the proposed administration budget for recreation and park purposes and make recommendations to the city council concerning its adoption.
2.32.160 - Public improvement program.
The community services commission shall recommend a program of public improvement and land acquisitions which it deems necessary or desirable.
2.32.170 - Promotion of public interest.
Parks and Recreation Commission
The community services commission shall promote public interest in and understanding of the recreation and park program and regulations relating thereto.
2.32.180 - Consulting of public.
The community services commission may consult and confer with public officials and agencies, civic educational, professional and other organizations, and with the citizens generally, with relation to the effecting of such program.
2.32.190 - Contracts for facilities.
The community services commission shall make recommendations to the city council concerning desirable contractual relations between city and public schools and other agencies for use of buildings, playgrounds, and other recreational facilities.
2.32.200 - Additional powers and duties.
The community services commission shall have such other powers and duties as the city council may, by ordinance or resolution, confer upon it.
ATTACHMENT F
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
Staffing Department: Parks and Recreation Department
GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING
MILESTONES STATUS
1 Coordinate volunteer
service opportunities
Spring & Fall
2026
Attend City operated
service events, Park
Appreciation Day,
Earth Day, and
cleanup events.
2 Host a Teen Night May 2026
Host a free event for
teens to enjoy a safe
and fun environment.
3 Education on government
agency operations and
non-profit agencies
Spring & Fall
2026
Host various
presentations by local
municipalities and
non-profits. Schedule
a day and time to tour
City Hall. Meet the
Directors of each
department and get a
brief description of
their department’s
operation.
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Matthew Strabone, City Treasurer
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY OF LA MESA INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Please see the attached Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
INVESTMENT POLICY
of the
City of La Mesa, California
FY 2025-2026
INVESTMENT POLICY
of the
City of La Mesa, California
Sections Title Page (s)
1. Policy Statement 1
2. Investment Policy Objectives 1-3
3. Investments 5
4. Safekeeping of Securities 6
5. Structure and Responsibilities 6-7
6. Reporting 7-8
7. Performance Standards 8
8. Review of Investment Policy 8
9. Definitions 8
10. Adoption of Policy 8
1 City of La Mesa, California
Investment Policy
1. POLICY STATEMENT
La Mesa is a “general law” city that derives its power from California State Law. Founded in 1869, the City was incorporated on February 16, 1912. La Mesa employs a “Council – Manager” form of government under which the Council determines policy and the City Manager assures that the policy is implemented.
All funds of the City of La Mesa shall be invested in accordance with principles of sound treasury management and in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and this Investment Policy (“Policy”). These funds are defined and detailed in the City’s Basic Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report and includes any new funds created unless specifically excluded by the City Council.
Specifically excluded funds are:
• Funds deposited with the State Public Employees’ Retirement System and; • Bond proceeds that are subject to covenants and restrictions as defined in the Bond’s indenture or are administered under the direct control of the Bond Trustee.
2. INVESTMENT POLICY OBJECTIVES
A. Overall Risk Profile
The objectives of the City of La Mesa’s Investment Program are, in order of priority:
1. Safety of principal of invested funds;
2. Maintenance of sufficient liquidity to meet cash flow needs; and
3. Attainment of the maximum yield possible consistent with the first two objectives.
To achieve these objectives, The City shall consider the following when making an investment:
1. Safety of Principal of Invested Funds
The City shall mitigate the risk to the principal of invested funds by limiting credit and interest rate risks. Credit Risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of a security’s issuer or backer. Interest Rate Risk is the risk that the market value of the City’s portfolio will fall due to an increase in general interest rates. a) Credit risk will be mitigated by:
(i) Limiting investments to only the most creditworthy types of securities as evaluated “investment grade” by one of the four Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSRO) as determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including (1) Standard &
2 Poor’s Rating Service, (2) Moody’s Investors Service, (3) Fitch Ratings and (4) Dominion Bond Rating Service.
(ii) Pre-qualifying the financial institutions with which it will do business; and (iii) Diversifying the investment portfolio so that the potential failure of any one issue or issuer will not place an undue financial burden on the City. b) Interest rate risk will be mitigated by:
(i) Structuring the City’s portfolio so that securities mature to meet the City’s cash requirements for ongoing obligations, thereby avoiding the possible need to sell securities on the open market at a loss prior to their maturity to meet those requirements;
(ii) Investing primarily in shorter term securities; and (iii) Not paying a premium for any security which includes a “call feature”, thereby obviating the possibility that the interest realized will be less than anticipated, and/or that the call price will be substantially less than book value, resulting in a potential loss of principal.
2. Liquidity
The City’s investment portfolio shall be structured in a manner which emphasizes that securities mature at the same time the cash is needed to meet anticipated demands (Static Liquidity). Additionally, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio should consist of securities with active secondary markets (Dynamic Liquidity). The maximum percentage of different investment instruments and maturities is described in Section 3 of this Policy.
3. Yield
Yield on the City’s investment portfolio is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. Investments are limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk being assumed. While it may occasionally be necessary or strategically prudent for the City to sell a security prior to maturity to either meet unanticipated cash needs or to restructure the portfolio, this policy specifically prohibits trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates.
B. Basic Investment Strategy
The City shall pursue a “passive” strategy of investment under which investments shall be of “laddered” maturities, facilitating a “buy and hold” process where financial instruments are held until maturity rather than actively bought and sold at various times. An “active” strategy of market timing, sector rotation, indexing to a benchmark and similar strategies are considered inappropriate for the size of the City’s portfolio. It is understood that it may be appropriate to sell a particular security prior to maturity to meet unanticipated cash needs with the approval of the City Treasurer.
3 The City’s investment portfolio shall be structured to provide that sufficient funds from investments are available each month to meet the City’s anticipated cash needs. Subject to the objectives stated above, the choice in investment instruments and maturities shall be based upon an analysis of future anticipated cash needs, existing and anticipated revenues, interest rate trends and specific market opportunities. No investment may have a maturity of more than five (5) years from its date of purchase without receiving prior City Council approval. After approval by City Council, reserve funds associated with bond issues may have a maturity of more than five (5) years, up to the earliest date the bonds may be redeemed or mature.
3. INVESTMENTS
This section of the Investment Policy identifies the types of investments in which the City will invest its idle or surplus funds.
A. Standard of Prudence
The City operates its investment portfolio under the Prudent Investor Standard (California Government Code Section 53600.3) which states in essence that:
“When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the Agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the Agency”.
This standard shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio.
Investment officers, acting in accordance with written procedures and this investment policy and exercising the above standard of diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
B. Eligible Securities
The City is provided a broad spectrum of eligible investments under California Government Code Section 53600 et seq. The City may choose to restrict its permitted investments to a smaller list of securities that more closely fits the City’s cash flow needs and requirements for liquidity. If a type of investment is added to California State Code 53600, it will not be added to the City’s Authorized Investment List until this policy is amended and approved by the City Council. If a type of investment permitted by the City should be removed from California State Code 53600, it will be deemed concurrently removed from the City’s Authorized Investment List, but existing holdings may be held until they mature.
State Government Authorized Investment List
Allowable investment instruments per State Government Code Section 53600 et seq., as applicable to all local agencies is detailed in the most recent version of the
4 Local Agency Investment Guidelines as published by the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission, located at
https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cdiac/laig/guideline.pdf
Appendix A, “Description of Authorized Investments” is a more detailed description of the authorized investments.
A thorough investigation of any pool or fund is required prior to investing and on a continual basis. The investigation will, at a minimum, obtain the following information:
• A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policies and objectives.
• A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are distributed.
• A description of how securities are safeguarded (including the settlement process) and how often the securities are marked to market and how often an audit is conducted.
• A description of who may invest in the program, how often, what size deposits and withdrawals are permitted.
• A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings. • Does the pool/fund maintain a reserve or retain earnings or is all income after expenses distributed to participants?
• A fee schedule which also discloses when and how fees are assessed. • Is the pool or fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds?
The purpose of this investigation is to determine the suitability of a pool or fund and evaluate the risk of placing funds with that pool or fund.
One of the purposes of this Investment Policy is to define what investments are permitted. If a type of security is not specifically authorized by this policy, it is not a permitted investment.
C. Qualification of Brokers, Dealers and Financial Institutions The City Treasurer or his/her designee will establish and maintain a list of the financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to provide investment and depository services to the City, will perform an annual review of the financial condition and registrations of the authorized financial institutions and broker/dealers, and require annual audited financial statements to be on file for each approved entity. The Investment Committee may limit the number of broker/dealers as deemed appropriate. The City shall annually provide its current Investment Policy to all interested parties, including all financial institutions and broker/dealers approved to do business with the City, by posting the Investment
5 Policy on the City’s official website. Upon annual notification of the approved Investment Policy, receipt of the Policy, including confirmation that it has been reviewed by the person(s) handling the City’s account, shall be acknowledged in writing within thirty (30) days of such notification. Audited financial statements as required herein shall be submitted annually within 90 days of such notification.
All broker-dealers and financial institutions that desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must submit a “Broker-Dealer Application” and related documents relative to eligibility. This includes a current audited financial statement, proof of state registration, proof of FINRA registration and a certification that all persons handling the City’s account have received and reviewed the City’s Investment Policy and agree to comply with the provisions outlined in the Investment Policy. The City Treasurer or his/her designee may establish any additional criteria deemed appropriate to evaluate and approve any financial services provider. The selection process for broker-dealers shall be open to both “primary dealers” and “secondary/regional dealers” that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule). The provider must have an office in California and the provider’s representative must be experienced in institutional trading practices and familiar with the California Government Code as it relates to investments by a City. The current form of the Broker Dealer Questionnaire appears as Appendix B of this policy.
D. Collateralization Requirements
Uninsured Time Deposits with banks and savings and loans shall be collateralized in the manner prescribed by state law for depositories accepting municipal investment funds.
Repurchase Agreements shall be collateralized in accordance with terms specified in the Master Repurchase Agreement. The valuation of collateral securing a Repurchase Agreement will be verified weekly to ensure a minimum of 102% of the value of the transaction being held by the City’s depository agent.
E. Diversification
The City will diversify its investments by security type and investment. With the exception of bond reserve funds, bond escrow funds, and any other specific funds approved by the City Council, the City Treasurer or his/her designee and the City’s Investment Committee will adopt a strategy that combines current market conditions with the City’s cash needs to maintain the maximum degree of safety of principal and liquidity throughout market and budgetary cycles. This strategy will include diversification by investment type and maturity allocations and will be included in the regular quarterly reports to Council. This strategy will be reviewed quarterly and can be changed accordingly.
F. Confirmations
Receipts for confirmation of purchases or sales of authorized securities shall include at a minimum the following information: trade date, settlement date, description of the security, par value, interest rate, price, yield to maturity, City’s name, net amount due and third party custodial information.
6 4. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
The City shall contract with a bank or banks for the safekeeping of securities that are owned by the City as a part of its investment portfolio or transferred to the City under the terms of a Repurchase Agreement.
All securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment (DVP) procedures. The third party bank trustee agreement must comply with Section 53608 of the California Government Code. No outside broker/dealer or advisor may have access to City funds, accounts or investments and any transfer of funds must be approved by the City Treasurer.
The City’s current custodian is:
U.S. Bank
Institutional Trust and Custody
60 Livingston Ave
Saint Paul, MN 55107
ATTN: Katherine G Artishon
Telephone 651.466.6312.
5. STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
This section of the policy defines the overall structure and areas of responsibility within the investment management program.
A. Responsibilities of the City Treasurer
The City Treasurer is charged with responsibility for maintaining custody of all public funds and securities belonging to or under the control of the City, and for the deposit and investment of those funds in accordance with principles of sound treasury management, applicable laws, ordinances and this Investment Policy.
This includes establishing written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this policy. The procedures should include reference to safekeeping, master repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, banking services contracts and depository agreements. Such procedures shall also include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions.
No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer and approved by the Investment Committee.
The current delegation of authority, Appendix C hereof, will be provided to all approved financial institutions. They will be notified of any changes to this delegation in a timely fashion and acknowledge receipt.
B. Responsibilities of the Director of Finance
The Director of Finance is responsible for keeping the City Council fully advised as to the financial condition of the City.
7 C. Responsibilities of the City Council
The City Council shall consider and adopt a written Investment Policy. As provided in that policy, the Council shall receive, review and accept quarterly investment reports.
D. Responsibilities of the Investment Committee
There shall be an Investment Committee consisting of the Director of Finance, the City Manager, the City Treasurer and their designees. The Committee shall meet quarterly to discuss cash flow requirements, the quarterly investment reports, investment strategies, investment and banking procedures and significant investment related work projects being undertaken in each department that will affect the cash flow management of the City Treasurer. This will require timely reports from the department heads to the Director of Finance concerning significant future cash flow requirements. The Investment Committee, with the approval of the City Council, may retain an external investment manager on behalf of the City. The investment manager will be required to act in accordance with this investment policy.
E. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
All City officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program, or that could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Those employees and investment officials shall disclose to the appropriate City executive (City Manager, City Attorney, or the Director of Finance) any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business within the City, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the City’s investments.
6. REPORTING
The City Treasurer shall prepare a quarterly investment report, including a succinct management summary that provides a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio and transactions made. This management summary shall be prepared in a manner that will allow the Director of Finance and the City Council to ascertain whether investment activities during the reporting period have complied with the City’s Investment Policy.
The quarterly report shall include the following:
A. A list of individual securities held at the end of the reporting period.
B. Unrealized gains or losses resulting from amortization or accretion of principal versus market value changes by listing the cost and market value of securities owned by the City.
C. Dollar weighted yield of the City’s investments.
D. Maturity schedule by type, of each of the City’s investments.
8 E. Statement of compliance of the City’s Investment Policy with California Government Code Section 53601 et seq.
F. Statement as to ability to meet all scheduled expenditure requirements for the next six months.
G. Market value, book value, par value and cost basis of all investments.
7. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The investment portfolio will be managed in accordance with the standards established within this Investment Policy and should obtain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles. The Investment Committee will establish and periodically review the City’s portfolio benchmarks and performance. A benchmark will be selected that compares with the portfolio composition, structure and investment strategy at that time.
8. REVIEW OF INVESTMENT POLICY
A. Policy Review
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed annually by the City Council to ensure its consistency with respect to the overall objectives of safety, liquidity and yield.
Proposed amendments to the policy shall be prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Investment Committee and then be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The Investment Committee shall annually review the Investment Policy and any proposed amendments and forward to the City Council for its consideration and adoption at a public meeting.
B. Internal Control and Review
The external auditors shall annually review the investments and general activities associated with the investment program to ensure compliance with this Investment Policy. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures established by this Investment Policy.
9. DEFINITIONS
The City has adopted the glossary of terms as published by the State of California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (Appendix A).
10. ADOPTION OF POLICY
This Policy was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Mesa on the 10th day of February 2026.
APPENDICES
A. Description of Authorized Investments and
Glossary
B. Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
C. Delegation of Authority
APPENDIX A
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The City of La Mesa’s investments may be placed in those securities as outlined below; the allocation between the various investment instruments may change in order to give the City the best combination of safety, liquidity and higher yield. Surplus funds of local agencies may only be invested in certain eligible securities. The City limits its investments to allowable securities under the State of California statutes (Government Code Section 53601, et seq., Section 53356, et seq., and Section 53595, et seq.) and is further limited to those listed below.
Certificates of Deposit
Certificates of deposit allow the City to select the exact amount and day of maturity as well as the exact depository. Certificates of deposit are issued in any amount for periods of time as short as fourteen days and as long as several years. At any given time, the City may have certificates of deposit in numerous financial institutions.
Collateral is not required for that portion of a deposit, which is insured pursuant to federal law.
Currently, the first $250,000 of a deposit is federally insured by FDIC. Non-negotiable CD’s for amounts in excess of federal insurance are not permitted.
Local Agency Investment Fund
The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) of the State of California offers high liquidity because deposits can be wired to the City checking account within twenty-four hours. Interest is computed on a daily basis.
This is a special fund within the State Treasury, which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000 in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum of $75,000,000 for any city. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash within twenty-four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly by adding it to the principal.
The State charges participants a small fee to cover reasonable costs associated with operating the investment pool, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings.
The interest rates received are fairly stable because of the pooling of the State’s surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local governments. This creates a well- diversified multi-billion dollar money pool.
U.S. Treasury Securities
U.S. Treasury securities are highly liquid and considered the safest of all investments because they are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. • U.S. Treasury Bills are direct obligations of the United States Government. They are issued weekly with maturity dates up to six months. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on a 360-day basis using the actual number of days to maturity.
They are issued in the minimum amount of $10,000 and in multiples of $5,000 thereafter.
• U.S. Treasury Notes are direct obligations of the United States Government. They are issued throughout the year with maturities up to 30 years. Notes are coupon securities paying a fixed amount every six months. The City will not invest in notes having maturities longer than five years.
Federal Agency Securities and Government Sponsored Enterprises Federal Agency securities are highly liquid and considered to be virtually without credit risk.
Federal Agency issues have a partial guarantee directly by the United States Government and are considered “moral” obligations of the U.S. Government (implied guarantee). All Agency obligations that are fixed-rate and meet the maturity restrictions of the State Code and this policy qualify as legal investments and are acceptable as security for public deposits. They usually provide higher yields than regular Treasury issues with all of the same advantages. Examples are:
• FNMA's (Federal National Mortgage Association) are used to assist the home mortgage market by purchasing mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration and the Farmers Home Administration, as well as those guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. • FHLB's (Federal Home Loan Bank Notes and Bonds) are issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank System to help finance the housing industry. The notes and bonds provide liquidity and home mortgage credit to savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, cooperative banks, insurance companies and mortgage-lending institutions. • Other Federal Agency issues are Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), Small Business Administration Notes (SBA), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA).
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Negotiable certificates of deposit are high-grade instruments, generally paying a higher interest rate than regular certificates of deposit. They are liquid because they can be traded in the secondary market.
Local agencies may invest up to 30% of their surplus money in negotiable certificates of deposit.
Negotiable certificates of deposit shall at no time exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000.
Medium-Term Corporate Notes
A City may invest in medium term corporate notes with a maximum maturity of five years issued by a corporation organized and operating within the United States, a depository institution licensed by the United States government or any state government and operating within the United States. The California State Code (53601 et seq.) permits cities to invest in corporations with a rating category of “A” or better, but the City will limit its investments in corporate medium term notes to those issued by corporations that have been rated “AA” or its equivalent by two nationally recognized ratings agencies.
Passbook Savings or Money Market Account
Passbook savings account allows us to transfer money from checking to savings and earn interest on smaller amounts of money, which are not available for a longer-term investment.
The passbook savings account is similar to a CD, except not for a fixed term. The interest rate is much lower than CD's, but the savings account provides daily liquidity and funds can be deposited and withdrawn according to our daily needs.
GLOSSARY
A
ACCRUED INTEREST
Coupon interest accumulated on a
bond or note since the last interest
payment or, for a new issue, from the
dated date to the date of delivery.
ARBITRAGE
Transactions by which securities are
bought and sold in different markets
at the same time for the sake of the
profit arising from a yield difference
in the two markets. The 1986 Tax
Reform Act made this practice by
municipalities illegal solely as a borrowing
tactic, except under certain
safe-harbor conditions.
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
Securities that are supported by
pools of assets, such as installment
loans or leases, or by pools of revolving
lines of credits. Asset-backed
securities are structured as trusts in
order to perfect a security interest in
the underlying assets.
AVERAGE
An arithmetic mean of selected stocks
intended to represent the behavior of
the market or some component of it.
B
BANK DEPOSITS
To deposit collateral in the form of
currency that may be in the form of
demand accounts (checking) or investments
in accounts that have a fixed
term and negotiated rate of interest.
BANK NOTES
A senior, unsecured, direct obligation
of a bank or U. S. branch of a
foreign bank.
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE
A draft or bill or exchange accepted
by a bank or trust company. The
accepting institution, as well as the
issuer, guarantees payment of the bill.
BASIS POINTS
Refers to the yield on bonds. Each
percentage point of yield in bonds
equals 100 basis points (1/100% or
0.01%). If a bond yield changes from
7.25% to 7.39%, that is a rate of 14
basis points.
BENCHMARK
A passive index used to compare the
performance, relative to risk and
return, of an investor’s portfolio.
BOND PROCEEDS
The money paid to the issuer by the
purchaser or underwriter of a new
issue of municipal securities. These
moneys are used to finance the project
or purpose for which the securities
were issued and to pay certain costs
of issuance as may be provided in the
bond contract.
BONDS
A debt obligation of a firm or public
entity. A bond represents the agreement
to repay the debt in principal
and, typically, in interest on the
principal.
BOOK VALUE
The value at which an asset is carried
on a balance sheet.
BROKER
A person or firm that acts as an
intermediary
by purchasing and selling
securities for others rather than for its
own account.
C
CALLABLE SECURITIES
An investment security that contains
an option allowing the issuer to
retire the security prior to its final
maturity date.
CASH FLOW
A comparison of cash receipts (revenues)
to required payments (debt
service, operating expenses, etc.).
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT
A short-term, secured deposit in a financial
institution that usually returns
principal and interest to the lender at
the end of the loan period. Certificates
of Deposit (CDs) differ in terms
of collateralization and marketability.
Those appropriate to public agency
investing include:
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Generally, short-term debt instrument
that usually pays interest and is
issued by a bank, savings or federal
association, state or federal credit
union, or state-licensed branch of a
foreign bank. The majority of negotiable
CDs mature within six months
while the average maturity is two
weeks. Negotiable CDs are traded in
a secondary market and are payable
upon order to the bearer or initial
depositor (investor).
Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
CDs that carry a penalty if redeemed
prior to maturity. A secondary market
does exist for these non-negotiable
CDs, but include a transaction cost
that reduces returns to the investor.
Non-negotiable CDs issued by banks
and savings and loans are insured by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
up to the amount of $250,000,
including principal and interest.
Amounts deposited above this amount
may be secured with other forms
of collateral through an agreement
between the investor and the issuer.
Collateral may include other securities
including Treasuries or agency securities
such as those issued by the Federal
National Mortgage Association.
CDARS (CERTIFICATE
OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
REGISTRY SYSTEM)
A private CD placement service that
allows local agencies to purchase
more than $250,000 in CDs from a
single financial institution (must be a
participating institution of CDARS)
while still maintaining FDIC insurance
coverage. CDARS is currently
the only entity providing this service.
CDARS facilitates the trading
of deposits between the California
institution and other participating
institutions in amounts that are less
than $250,000 each, so that FDIC
coverage is maintained.
CD PLACEMENT SERVICE
A service that allows local agencies to
purchase more than $250,000 in CDs
from a single financial institution
while still maintaining FDIC insurance
coverage. See “CDARS”.
COLLATERALIZATION
Process by which a borrower pledges
securities, property, or other deposits
for the purpose of securing the repayment
of a loan and/or security.
COMMERCIAL PAPER
An unsecured short-term promissory
note issued by corporations, with maturities
ranging from 2 to 270 days.
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS
Debt instruments, typically unsecured,
issued by corporations, with
original maturities in most cases
greater than one year and less than
ten years.
COUNTY POOLED
INVESTMENT FUNDS
The aggregate of all funds from public
agencies placed in the custody of the
county treasurer or chief finance officer
for investment and reinvestment.
COUPON
The annual rate of interest that a
bond’s issuer promises to pay the
bondholder on the bond’s face value; a
certificate attached to a bond evidencing
interest due on a payment date.
CREDIT RATING
Various alphabetical and numerical
designations used by institutional
investors, Wall Street underwriters,
and commercial rating companies
to give relative indications of bond
and note creditworthiness. Standard
& Poor’s and Fitch Ratings use the
same system, starting with their highest
rating, of AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB,
B, CCC, CC, C, and D for default.
Moody’s Investors Service uses AAA,
AA, A, BAA, BA, B, CAA, CA, and
D. Each of the services use pluses (+),
minuses (-), or numerical modifiers
to indicate steps within each category.
The top four letter categories are
considered investment grade ratings.
CREDIT RISK
The chance that an issuer will be unable
to make scheduled payments of
interest and principal on an outstanding
obligation. Another concern for
investors is that the market’s perception
of a corporation’s credit will cause
the market value of a security to fall,
even if default is not expected.
CUSIP NUMBER
The Committee on Uniform Security
Information Procedures (CUSIP)
Number refers to a security’s identification
number assigned to each
publicly traded security by the CUSIP
Service Bureau operated by Standard
& Poor’s for the American Bankers
Association. The CUSIP Number is
a nine-character identifier unique to
the issuer, the specific issue and the
maturity, if applicable (the first six
characters identifying the issuer, the
next two identifying the security and
the last digit providing a check digit
to validate the accuracy of the preceding
CUSIP number).
CUSTODIAN
A bank or other financial institution
that keeps custody of stock certificates
and other assets.
D
DEALER
Someone who acts as a principal in all
transactions, including underwriting,
buying, and selling securities, including
from his/her own account.
DEFEASED BOND ISSUES
Issues that have sufficient money to
retire outstanding debt when due so
that the agency is released from the
contracts and covenants in the bond
document.
DERIVATIVE
Securities that are based on, or derived
from, some underlying asset, reference
date, or index.
DISCOUNT
Discount means the difference between
the par value of a security and
the cost of the security, when the
cost is below par. Investors purchase
securities at a discount when return
to the investor (yield) is higher than
the stated coupon (interest rate) on
the investment.
DURATION
A measure of the timing of the cash
flows to be received from a security
that provides the foundation for a
measure of the interest rate sensitivity
of a bond. Duration is an elasticity
measure and represents the percentage
change in price divided by the
percentage change in interest rates.
A high duration measure indicates
that for a given level of movement in
interest rates, prices of securities will
vary considerably.
E
EFFECTIVE DURATION
Duration measures the weighted
average of the present value of the
cash flows of a fixed-income investment.
Effective duration measures
the price sensitivity of fixed-income
investments, especially for those with
embedded option features such as call
options. As yields rise, the effective
duration of a callable investment rises
to reflect the fact that it has become
less likely to be called. The more rates
rise, the longer the effective duration
will become, approaching the duration
to maturity. The converse is true
in a declining interest rate environment
(that is, the more rates fall, the
shorter the effective duration will
become, approaching the duration to
call). For securities without an embedded
option, the duration to call,
maturity, and effective duration are all
the same. The calculation for effective
duration is complicated and involves
averaging the duration under a simulation
of many possible interest rate
scenarios in the future.
EXTENDABLE NOTES
Securities with maturity dates that
can be extended by mutual agreement
between the issuer and investor.
When investing in these types
of securities, the maturity date plus
the stated extendable option must
not exceed the time frames that are
allowed in California Government
Code or the investment policy for
the investment type.
F
FIDUCIARY
An individual who holds something
in trust for another and bears liability
for its safekeeping.
FIRST TIER SECURITIES
Securities that have received short-term
debt ratings in the highest category
from the requisite nationally
recognized statistical-rating organizations
(NRSROs), or are comparable
unrated securities, or are issued by
money market funds, or government
securities. [See SEC Rules: Paragraph
(A)(12) of rule 2A-7.]
G
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS BOARD (GASB)
A standard-setting body, associated
with the Financial Accounting
Foundation, which prescribes standard
accounting practices for governmental
units.
GUARANTEED INVESTMENT
CONTRACTS (GICS)
An agreement acknowledging receipt
of funds for deposit, specifying terms
for withdrawal, and guaranteeing a
rate of interest to be paid.
I
INTEREST
The amount a borrower pays to a
lender for the use of his or her money.
INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS
Investment agreements are contracts
with respect to funds deposited by an
investor. Investment agreements are
often separated into those offered by
banks and those offered by insurance
companies. In the former case, they
are sometimes referred to as “bank
investment contracts.”
INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE
A committee of three to eleven members
formed under Section 27131 to
monitor and review a county’s investment
policy by causing an annual
audit and discussing its finding at an
open meeting. Although cities and
other local agencies are not required
to compose an investment oversight
committee, the State Legislature
has declared that all local agencies
“should participate in reviewing the
policies that guide the investment of
those funds.”
L
LIQUIDITY
The measure of the ability to convert
an instrument to cash on a given date
at full face or par value.
LIQUIDITY RISK
The chance that a security, sold prior to
maturity, will be sold at a loss of value.
For a local agency, the liquidity risk of
an individual investment may not be as
critical as how the overall liquidity of
the portfolio allows the agency to meet
its cash needs.
LOCAL AGENCY
INVESTMENT FUND
A voluntary investment fund open
to government entities and certain
non-profit organizations in California
that is managed by the State
Treasurer’s Office.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP)
Investment pools that range from the
State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) to county
pools, to Joint Powers Authorities
(JPAs). These funds are not subject
to the same SEC rules applicable to
money market mutual funds.
M
MARKET RISK
The chance that the value of a security
will decline as interest rates rise. In
general, as interest rates fall, prices of
fixed income securities rise. Similarly,
as interest rates rise, prices fall. Market
risk also is referred to as systematic
risk or risk that affects all securities
within an asset class similarly.
MARKET VALUE
The price at which a security is trading
and presumably could be purchased
or sold at a particular point
in time.
MATURITY
The date on which the principal or
stated value of an investment becomes
due and payable.
MEDIUM-TERM NOTE
Corporate or depository institution
debt securities meeting certain minimum
quality standards (as specified
in the California Government Code)
with a remaining maturity of five
years or less.
MONEY MARKET
MUTUAL FUNDS
MMF’s are mutual funds that invest
exclusively in short-term money
market instruments. MMF’s seek the
preservation of capital as a primary
goal while maintaining a high degree
of liquidity and providing income
representative of the market for short
term investments.
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are
created when a mortgagee or a purchaser
of residential real estate mortgages
creates a pool of mortgages and
markets undivided interests or participations
in the pool. MBS owners
receive a prorata share of the interest
and principal cash flows (net of fees)
that are “passed through” from the
pool of mortgages. MBS are complex
securities whose cash flow is determined
by the characteristics of the
mortgages that are pooled together.
Investors in MBS face prepayment
risk associated with the option of the
underlying mortgagors to pre-pay or
payoff their mortgage. Most MBS are
issued and/or guaranteed by federal
agencies and instrumentalities (e.g.,
Government National Mortgage Association
(GNMA), Federal National
Mortgage Association (FNMA), and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(FHLMC)).
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
OBLIGATIONS
Securities that are created when
residential mortgages (or other mortgages)
are pooled together and undivided
interests or participations in the
stream of revenues associated with the
mortgages are sold.
MUNICIPAL NOTES, BONDS, AND
OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Obligations issued by state and local
governments to finance capital and
operating expenses.
MUTUAL FUNDS
An investment company that pools
money and can invest in a variety of
securities, including fixed-income securities
and money market instruments.
N
NET ASSET VALUE
Net asset value (NAV) is a term used
in the mutual fund industry to determine
the average price per share of a
pool or mutual fund. How this measure
varies over time provides information
on whether the pool is stable
or variable. NAV is the market value
of all securities in a mutual fund,
less the value of the fund’s liabilities,
divided by the number of shares in
the fund outstanding. Shares of mutual
funds are purchased at the fund’s
offered NAV.
NET PRESENT VALUE
An amount that equates future cash
flows with their value in present terms.
NOTE
A written promise to pay a specified
amount to a certain entity on demand
or on a specified date. Usually bearing
a short-term maturity of a year or less
(though longer maturities are issued—
see “Medium-Term Note”).
O
OPTIONS
An option is a contract that gives
the buyer the right to buy or sell an
obligation at a specified price for
a specified time. Exchange Traded
Options are standardized option
contracts that are actively traded on
the Chicago Board of Exchange on a
daily basis whereas Over-the-Counter
Options are traded directly between
the buyer and seller at agreed upon
prices and conditions (the former
type of option is therefore more
liquid than the latter).
P
PAR AMOUNT OR PAR VALUE
The principal amount of a note or
bond which must be paid at maturity.
Par, also referred to as the “face
amount” of a security, is the principal
value stated on the face of the security.
A par bond is one sold at a price of
100 percent of its principal amount.
PORTFOLIO
Combined holding of more than one
stock, bond, commodity, real estate
investment, cash equivalent, or other
asset. The purpose of a portfolio is to
reduce risk by diversification.
PREMIUM
Premium means the difference between
the par value of a security and
the cost of the security, when the cost
is above par. Investors pay a premium
to purchase a security when the return
to the investor (yield) is lower than
the stated coupon (interest rate) on
the investment.
PRICE
Price is the amount of monetary
consideration
required by a willing seller
and a willing buyer to sell an investment
on a particular date.
PRINCIPAL
The face value or par value of a debt
instrument, or the amount of capital
invested in a given security. PROSPECTUS
A legal document that must be provided
to any prospective purchaser
of a new securities offering registered
with the SEC that typically includes
information on the issuer, the issuer’s
business, the proposed use of proceeds,
the experience of the issuer’s
management, and certain certified
financial statements (also known as an
“official statement”).
PRUDENT INVESTOR STANDARD
A standard of conduct where a person
acts with care, skill, prudence,
and diligence when investing, reinvesting,
purchasing, acquiring,
exchanging, selling, and managing
funds. The test of whether the standard
is being met is if a prudent person
acting in such a situation would
engage in similar conduct to ensure
that investments safeguard principal
and maintain liquidity.
R
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
An agreement of one party (for example,
a financial institution) to sell
securities to a second party (such as a
local agency) and simultaneous agreement
by the first party to repurchase
the securities at a specified price from
the second party on demand or at a
specified date.
REVERSE REPURCHASE
AGREEMENTS
An agreement of one party (for example,
a financial institution) to
purchase securities at a specified price
from a second party (such as a public
agency) and a simultaneous agreement
by the first party to resell the securities
at a specified price to the second party
on demand or at a specified date.
RISK
The uncertainty of maintaining the
principal or interest associated with an
investment due to a variety of factors.
RULE G-37 OF THE
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES
RULEMAKING BOARD
Federal regulations to sever any connection
between the making of political
contributions and the awarding of
municipal securities business.
S
SAFEKEEPING SERVICE
Offers storage and protection of
assets provided by an institution serving
as an agent.
SAFETY
In the context of investing public
funds, safety relates to preserving
the principal of an investment in an
investment portfolio; local agencies
address the concerns of safety by
controlling
exposure to risks.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION (SEC)
The federal agency responsible for
supervising and regulating the securities
industry.
SECURITIES LENDING
AGREEMENT
An agreement of one party (for
example, a local agency) to borrow
securities at a specified price from a
second party (for example, another
local agency) with a simultaneous
agreement by the first party to return
the security at a specified price to the
second party on demand or at a specified
date. These agreements generally
are collateralized and involve a third
CALIFORNIA DEBT AND INVESTMENT
ADVISORY COMMISSION
party custodian to hold the securities
and collateral. Economically similar to
reverse repurchase agreement.
T
TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION
NOTES (TRANS)
Notes issued in anticipation of receiving
tax proceeds or other revenues at a
future date.
TIME DEPOSITS
Time deposits are issued by depository
institutions against funds deposited for
a specified length of time. Time deposits
include instruments such as deposit
notes. They are distinct from certificates
of deposit (CDs) in that interest
payments on time deposits are calculated
in a manner similar to that of
corporate bonds whereas interest payments
on CDs are calculated similar to
that of money market instruments.
TRUSTEE, TRUST COMPANY OR
TRUST DEPARTMENT OF A BANK
A financial institution with powers
to act in a fiduciary capacity for the
benefit of the bondholders in enforcing
the terms of the bond contract.
U
UNDERWRITER
A dealer that purchases a new issue of
municipal securities for resale.
U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS
Debt obligations of the U.S. Government
sold by the Treasury Department
in the forms of bills, notes, and
bonds. Bills are short-term obligations
that mature in one year or less and are
sold at a discount. Notes are obligations
that mature between one year
and ten years. Bonds are long-term
obligations that generally mature in
ten years or more.
W
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
MATURITY (WAM)
The average maturity of all the securities
that comprise a portfolio, typically
expressed in days or years.
Y
YIELD
The current rate of return on an
investment security generally expressed
as a percentage of the securities
current price.
YIELD CURVE
A graphic representation that shows
the relationship at a given point in
time between yields and maturity for
bonds that are identical in every way
except maturity.
Z
ZERO-INTEREST BOND
A bond on which interest is not payable
until maturity (or earlier redemption),
but compounds periodically
to accumulate to a stated maturity
amount. Zero-interest bonds are typically
issued at a discount and repaid at
par upon maturity.
APPENDIX B
Investment Policy
Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
1. Name of Firm:
2. Address:
3. Telephone:
4. Principal(s)/Manager(s)/Partner(s):
Name: Title:
Name: Title:
5. Is Your Firm:
Broker? Yes No (a firm that does not own the securities being offered) Dealer? Yes No (a firm that owns a position in the securities being offered)
6. Year Founded:
7. Firm’s Total Volume of U.S. Government Securities Traded in Most Recent Fiscal Year:
$
Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
8. Financial Instruments Most Regularly Offered:
9. References: (Public sector clients in the local geographical area are preferred):
Name: Title: Telephone:
Address:
Name: Title: Telephone:
Address:
Name: Title: Telephone:
Address:
10. Local Office and Representative assigned to the City of La Mesa account:
NOTE: Your firm must have an office in California (See 3.c of the Policy) Address:
Name: Title: Telephone:
11. Has any client sustained a loss on a securities transaction engendered from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the risk characteristic of the financial instrument?
Yes No
If Yes, please explain:
Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
12. Has your firm, its employees, or local office been the subject of a state or federal investigation for alleged unfair, illegal, or fraudulent activities? Yes No
If Yes, please explain:
13. Please explain your usual custody or delivery process. Who audits these fiduciary systems?
14. Describe the capital line and trading limits imposed on the office that would service the account and conduct business with the City of La Mesa:
15. Please enclose recent audited financial statements and/or other indications of your firm’s capitalization.
16. Please describe the limits of insurance (Securities Investor Protection Corporation, excess SIPC, etc.) available:
17. Please provide proof of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) certification.
18. Please provide proof of registration with the State of California.
19. Please provide proof that your firm is qualified under SEC Rule 15C3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule).
Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
20. What information do you require of the City of La Mesa?
21. What transaction documents can the City of La Mesa expect to receive from you?
22. Please confirm that you and your representatives have read and understand the City of La Mesa’s Investment Policy and are familiar with Government Code Sections 53600 et seq by signing below:
Name: Signature:
Title: Date:
Attach resumes of all persons receiving a copy of our investment policy.
Broker/Dealer Questionnaire
APPENDIX C
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The following named individua(s) are hereby designated ASSISTANT CITY TREASURER with full authority to act, in descending order, as La Mesa City Treasurer during periods of my disability, extended absence or inability to perform the Treasurer’s tasks, duties and responsibilities:
This designation shall remain valid until rescinded, superseded or my elected term of office expires, whichever occurs earlier.
_____________________________
Matt Strabone
City Treasurer of the City of La Mesa, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
On ____________, before me, Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk, personally appeared ___________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
___________________________
Megan Wiegelman, MPA, CMC
(SEAL) City Clerk of the City of La Mesa
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
REPEALING LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (LMMC) CHAPTER 18.18 –
SIDEWALK CAFES
At the Council meeting of January 27, 2026, the Council unanimously approved the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance repealing LMMC Chapter 18.18 – Sidewalk Cafes.
Staff recommends the Council approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
Attachment: A. Draft Ordinance
ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA REPEALING LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (LMMC) CHAPTER 18.18 -
SIDEWALK CAFES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa adopted Ordinance 2358, June 21, 1984, which enacted Chapter 18.18 Sidewalk Cafes;
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to repeal LMMC Chapter 18.18 – Sidewalk Cafes;
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to replace LMMC Chapter 18.18 – Sidewalk Cafes with a policy for sidewalk dining to promote opportunities to revitalize commercial districts, and maximize the potential of commercial centers in order to attract an appealing mix of new businesses, consistent with the goals of the La Mesa General Plan; WHEREAS, the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act in accordance with Title 14 Cal. Code Regs. 15061(b)(3); and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to repeal the ordinance adopting Chapter 18.18 – Sidewalk Cafes of the La Mesa Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California as follows:
SECTION 1: LMMC Chapter 18.18 –Sidewalk Cafes is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days of its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held on the 27th day of January, 2026, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 10 th day of February, 2026, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Ordinance No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lynnette Santos, Director of Community Development Kristen Flores, Management Analyst
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: Quarterly Permit and Development Report (October 2025 – December 2025)
The Quarterly Permit and Development Update shows how the City continues to fulfill its mission of providing high-quality public services by tracking and improving permit processes and turnaround times. This update covers permit activity, including applications and issued permits, as well as process improvements made between October and December 2025. Consistent with the fourth quarter of the previous year, development and construction activity experienced a slight seasonal decrease from the third quarter with 368 applications received and 377 permits issued. This trend is typical for this time of year. Table 1 shows the number of applications received and permits issued for both the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2025.
Table 1 - Total Applications and Permits
Year Quarter Applications Issued Permits
2025 4th Quarter 368 377
2025
3rd Quarter 465 409
A summary of applications and permits issued since the first quarter of 2024, organized by permit type, has been provided in Attachment A.
Review and Processing Times
Community Development continues to see success with the MaintStar Permitting Portal and the City’s instant solar permitting platform, Symbium. Staff utilizes the MaintStar
portal’s permit tracking system to monitor the review timeframes for permit submittals.
This system allows staff to track submittal dates, the number of reviews, and the length of each review.
Table 2 shows the average review and processing times for additions/alterations and miscellaneous projects in both the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2025. The slight increase in processing times within this quarter, is largely attributable to several holidays that fell within the quarter. It is anticipated that there will be a return to normal processing times during the first quarter of 2026. Average processing times reflect the total duration from initial submittal to final approval, and also include any time the applicant spends resubmitting required corrections or additional information.
Table 2 - Review and Processing Times
Project Type Quarter -Year Average Time for
First Review
Average Processing Time
(Application to Approval)
Additions/Alterations
4th Quarter - 2025 17 days 24 days
3rd Quarter - 2025 10 days 21 days
Miscellaneous
4th Quarter - 2025 5 days 8 days
3rd Quarter - 2025 5 days 9 days
Solar
The use of instant solar permitting remains consistent with previous quarters. Of the 86 solar permits issued in the 4th quarter, 56 permits were issued instantly via the Symbium platform, consistent with the 58 instant solar permits issued in the 3rd quarter.
We continue to encourage the use of the instant permitting platform through the instant permitting portal from the solar permit webpage. Staff anticipates a similar number of Symbium submittals moving into the first quarter of 2026.
Table 3 – Review and Processing Times for Solar
Year Quarter Average Time for
First Review
Average Processing Time
(Application to Approval)
2025 4th Quarter 5 days 10 days
2025 3rd Quarter 5 days 11 days
Accessory Dwelling Units
The average first review time for Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) permits remained consistent with the third quarter. Overall processing times increased slightly during the holiday season, consistent with anticipated seasonal impacts. First quarter 2026 processing times for ADU’s are also expected to realign with or improve upon average processing times. Staff will continue to monitor review timeframes and work to reduce
average processing times through on-going training on state ADU laws, updating application handouts, and promoting the use of the ADU guidebook by applicants.
Additional process improvements are discussed below.
As reported in 2025, the City implemented a Pre-approved ADU Plans program. The Pre-Approved Plans program provides five pre-approved ADU plans, available to the public via City’s ADU webpage. To date, four pre-approved ADU applications have been received, two of which were received in the 4th quarter. Of the four, two have been approved and issued, and one has completed construction. Ongoing program promotion by staff, including a promotional video currently in development, is expected to drive an increase in applications as we move into 2026.
Table 4 – Review and Processing Times for Accessory Dwelling Units Year Quarter Average Time for
First Review
Average Processing Time
(Application to Approval)
2025 4th Quarter 23 days 58 days
2025 3rd Quarter 22 days 55 days
Conclusion
Total permits issued peaked in Q2 at 432, then decreased to 409 in Q3 and 377 in Q4.
This pattern aligns with trends observed in 2024 and remains within the typical range per quarter, indicating a stable pace of development activity and permit activity that peaks around mid-year, with a seasonal decrease towards the end of the year.
As part of ongoing efforts to educate, inform, and streamline the development process for applicants, the Community Development Department continues to update its webpage, including the Interactive Development Project Map. This map is updated monthly to provide key information about new projects and their status in the planning process. In addition, the MaintStar permitting map remains a valuable resource for those interested in viewing active or completed projects.
Attachment A - Applications and Issued Permits by Permit Type Q1
2024
Q2
2024
Q3
2024
Q4
2024
Q1
2025
Q2
2025
Q3
2025
Q4
2025
Accessory Dwelling Units 28 42 23 24 19 20 34 39
New Construction 6 10 6 6 6 9 16 3
Solar Photovoltaic 93 110 100 79 90 73 83 82
Alterations/Additions 82 111 121 99 98 115 125 108
Miscellaneous 194 196 218 172 184 248 202 133
Grading 0 0 2 1 0 1 5 3
Total 403 469 470 381 397 466 465 368
APPLICATIONS
Q1
2024
Q2
2024
Q3
2024
Q4
2024
Q1
2025
Q2
2025
Q3
2025
Q4
2025
Accessory Dwelling Units 39 23 30 23 22 18 25 17
New Construction 11 10 1 5 10 10 8 20
Solar Photovoltaic 103 104 94 91 94 72 76 86
Alterations/Additions 84 92 113 110 101 105 108 119
Miscellaneous 193 178 205 191 187 225 190 132
Grading 0 0 2 5 1 2 2 3
Total 430 407 445 425 415 432 409 377
ISSUED PERMITS
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (HOME) PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 – DECEMBER
2025)
Please find attached the Fourth Quarter HOME Report.
City of La Mesa
Homeless Outreach &
Mobile Engagement (HOME) Program
Quarterly Report: October – December 2025
HOME Program Overview
The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) Team is an initiative of the City of La Mesa and the La Mesa Police Department (LMPD). The HOME Team provides a housing-first and traumainformed approach to addressing homelessness in La Mesa. The HOME Team utilizes progressive engagement and harm reduction to assist individuals who are unable to access homeless services on their own. This report breaks down the the HOME Team efforts and successes during the 4 th quarter
of 2025.
Since the beginning of the quarter, the HOME program outreach specialists have:
Contacted 137 total individuals experiencing homelessness and newly enrolled 68 adults and 27 children. Many of these newly enrolled adults are one-time contacts that were provided shortterm services as they passed through La Mesa. A total of 61 individuals contacted this quarter were connected to a temporary or permanent home.
Responded to 505 service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and as follow-ups to previous contacts. Historically, many of these calls would have been handled by city emergency response services and law enforcement. Prioritized the most vulnerable individuals in the City of La Mesa, including individuals living on the street with chronic physical and mental health conditions, households with children, and individuals facing chronic homelessness.
Clients Served
The HOME Team operates out of LMPD headquarters in downtown La Mesa and responds to nonemergency calls for service related to homelessness that are generated through police dispatch, HOME email, and The HOME Hotline. Each of these calls is first attended by a HOME Team outreach specialist; PD or PERT officers are only requested for rare cases involving legal or safety concerns.
Total Number of Clients Served
New Clients in Quarter Continuing Clients
*Instances of service are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service. 59 137 78
Instances of
Service*
349
Callsfor
Service
505
HOME Team Assistance: 41
# of Calls LMPD Officers
requested HOME assistance
# of Callsthe HOME team
requested:
Officer Assistance: 5
PERT Assistance: 1
Client Demographics and Household Composition
Total Clients Served Demographics
71 66
Female Male
0 to 17 18 to 24
25 to 34 35 to 44
45 to 54 55 to 64
65 or Above Unknown
Chronically
Homeless
64%
790
Single Person
Households
9 Adult Couple
Households
14 Households
with Children
12 33
21 12
23 17
19
Housing Outcomes
41 households (61 people) exited the HOME program to a shelter, temporary placement, institutional setting or permanent placement during the quarter. 8 households (13 persons) exited to Emergency shelter, including hotel or motel paid for with emergency shelter voucher, Host Home shelter, and traditional emergency shelter.
10 households (13 persons) exited to temporary living situation including transitional housing or staying with friends and/ or family. 3 households (3 persons) exited to an institutional setting including detox/ substance use rehabilitation program, jail/ prison, or a long term care facility/ nursing home.
20 households (32 people) exited to permanent housing, defined as a leased unit meeting United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) occupancy standards with or without supportive services, such as mental health counseling.
16 housing matches were provided through the Coordinated Entry System
Housing Matches
Housing matches provided through the Coordinated Entry System (CES) are an essential part of people attempting to access permanent housing. In short, a housing match is when a person is connected to a housing provider for assistance in the form of a subsidized room or ongoing rental assistance. Once a person has been matched through CES, the HOME Team does their best to help a client connect with the housing provider to complete the housing process. During this quarter, the HOME Team clients received 16 housing matches.
Client Services
The HOME Team continues to excel in helping clients navigate and connect with a variety of existing services within the community. Some of these services include ongoing nutritional, medical, and financial support through programs such as Cal-Fresh, Medical, and General Relief.
The HOME Team was able to connect multiple people with these services by transporting and supporting these clients in navigating these services at the Family Resource Centers located in Lemon Grove and El Cajon.
The HOME Team continues to provide housing navigation throughout this quarter. Housing Navigation aids individuals who have an income, housing voucher, or rental assistance subsidies that could support a rental unit on an ongoing basis. The HOME Team Housing Navigator works with these clients to identify suitable units, pay for application fees, advocate to landlords, and provide financial assistance to cover the move-in costs related to the rental unit.
The HOME Team also continues to assist with acquiring identifying documentation. Almost all of the clients who successfully exited the program during this quarter worked with the HOME Team to acquire both State Identification cards and/ or Social Security Cards; attaining these documents was a necessity for their housing placements.
The HOME Team continues to work closely with a non-profit: 2nd Chance. This non-profit provides a Job Readiness Training (JRT) course for clients who struggle with connecting to employment due to their homelessness status and/ or involvement with the justice system. As part of the JRT, the participants are provided with professional interview attire. During the last week of JRT, the participants take part in a round of interviews with potential employers including but not limited to Western Towing, ACE Parking, and Sycuan Casino.
Having consistent access to a van continues to be an important resource for clients. During the quarter, the HOME Team utilized the van to view units for rent in El Cajon, Downtown San Diego, and San Diego County. Being able to go to units quickly and with little notice has resulted in clients being able to successfully exit our program into rental assistance programs. The HOME Team has also utilized this van to clear encampments by taking clients and their belongings to storage, housing opportunities, or alternative camping locations. Most importantly, this van is accessible to people that have disabilities or are experiencing mobility issues.
During this quarter, the HOME Team provided some form of financial and/or basic-needs assistance to all enrolled clients with the dual objectives of moving them toward a housing outcome and keeping them safe.
All clients received COVID-19-related services, including updates related to local public-health guidelines, vaccine information, hygiene supplies, and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as face masks and hand sanitizer.
All clients received food, water, or other nutrition services, with approximately 60 prioritized for on-going meal support.
HOME program staff distributed $32,338.40 in direct financial assistance, including vehicle repair, and funds used to secure new rental units. 0 household received accommodation in a motel, designed to provide shortterm, bridge shelter for those with a concrete housing plan.
HOME program staff arranged 69 rides to apartment viewings, shelter stays, program intake interviews, and other critical appointments via ridesharing service.
4 Clients were connected to ongoing physical, mental, and/or behavioral healthcare.
20 Instances of clients connected to CA ID, Birth Certificate, and/ or Social Security Card.
10 Instances of clients connected to Cal Fresh and/ or Medi-Cal. 3 of clients connected to Serving Seniors.
2 Instances of people enrolled into employment training and support
Ongoing Care
Throughout the life of the program, HOME has noticed that the majority of calls related to someone experiencing homelessness were generated because of another community member’s concern for a person’s mental, physical, or behavioral health. Because of this, the HOME Team has prioritized connecting people to ongoing healthcare through organizations such as Family Health Centers, East County Behavioral Health, Jane Westin, Alvarado Parkway Institute, McAlister, Peoples Advocacy Voices & Education. and Volunteers in Medicine. All of these organizations provide low to no-cost services to people experiencing homelessness. Connecting people to ongoing and preventative care such as what is being offered at these organizations is essential to addressing issues that invariably result in emergent health situations for people experiencing homelessness. These situations result in over-burdend emergency rooms, ambulances, and other emergency services. Additionally, due to the limited nature of HOME services provided to a person after they are housed, having connections to ongoing community support is an important part of someone maintaining housing stability.
Calls for Service
The HOME Team responded to 505 calls for service during the quarter. This number includes service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and follow-ups to previous contacts.
Of these calls for service, 63 calls were new requests for assistance related to homelessness in the City. Historically, these calls would have been addressed by city emergency response services and law enforcement.
Of these calls, 259 were direct responses to calls to the HOME hotline and email requests made by community members regarding someone experiencing homelessness.
Additionally, 214 calls were service-driven appointments with clients or proactive rapport-building contacts, in support of the HOME Team’s mission.
During the entirety of this quarter, the HOME Team was connected to the La Mesa Police Department’s dispatch center via police radio. Starting the 4th quarter of 2021, the HOME Team has been able to realize the benefits of the technology and partnerships with call-takers through decreased response times to current calls for service, improved support to police officers, enhanced understanding of the program workload and service provision through data tracking, and improved safety of the HOME Team members and the community.
Hotel Utilization
The HOME Team did not provide hotel accommodation for any clients during the quarter. The HOME Team can utilize local motels as a form of shelter to bridge this gap. This service is a crucial benefit for people that have a scheduled move-in date. This bridge housing assists in allowing the client to keep their phones charged, meet regularly with HOME Housing Navigator, and present at lease signing/ final walkthrough as clean, showered, and presentable.
Client success stories
In June 2025, the HOME Team encountered a veteran who reported experiencing homelessness since losing his employment in 2023. This veteran was previously housed in an apartment in La Mesa, and when he lost his job, he moved into his vehicle.
After reaching out to the HOME Team, the veteran and HOME immediately began exploring available resources. First, the HOME Team assisted the veteran with obtaining a copy of his DD-214 to begin connecting to veteran assistance programs. After learning that the veteran was eligible for Supportive Services for Veterans & Families (SSVF), a rental assistance program for veterans, the HOME Team completed a referral to PATH’s SSVF program.
While in the process of working with SSVF, the HOME Team connected this client to a community event: the Stand Down Resource Event. This is a two-day event dedicated to serving unhoused and at-risk veterans, their families, and new this year—active-duty service members.
This vital event provides access to support, shelter, and life-changing services. While at the event, the HOME Team assisted the veteran with connecting to and completing paperwork to both upgrade his discharge status and get rated for disability related to his service. He was ultimately granted an upgrade to his discharge and a disability rating at the end of 2025.
Unfortunately, while in the process of working with the HOME Team, the veteran’s car broke down, and it was towed. The HOME Team worked quickly to connect him to a Grant Per Diem (GPD) shelter at PATH which is funded through the VA. While at GPD, the client was able to attain employment and rental housing with PATH’s SSVF assistance. The client officially moved into housing on 11/22/25.
In September 2025, the HOME Team met a couple who had been homeless for more than 3 years.
Both clients were in their early 20s and fell into the Transition Age Youth (TAY) category. This couple was originally contacted by a La Mesa Police Department officer and referred to the HOME Team.
This couple immediately accepted services and began working with the HOME Team to get their documentation replaced and be placed into the Coordinated Entry System (CES). They were in CES for less than a month before receiving a match for Rapid Rehousing Support. Rapid Rehousing is a short-term rental assistance & case management program designed to assist people with moving into a rental unit then attaining employment to ultimately take over the rent.
The HOME Team assisted this couple with attending their Rapid Rehousing Intake and followup appointments. In early October, the HOME Team provided transportation for these clients to view a unit in downtown San Diego. Their application to this unit was accepted and they moved in on 10/20/2025.
Community Support Partnerships
Journey Community Church continues to provide any and all food items to the HOME Program, allowing HOME staff to feed up to 60 people per week
La Mesa Village Association
La Mesa Thrift Shop
La Mesa First United Methodist Church
Empire Thrift Store of El Cajon
Eagle Scouts
Community Resource Partnerships
Home-Start, Inc.
East County Behavioral Health
Center Star ACT
McAlister Inc.
La Mesa – Spring Valley School District Social Workers East County Homeless Task Force
San Diego County Mental Health
HOME staff have developed a word-of-mouth network of donors and residents and regularly interface with anyone interested in helping those facing hardship on the streets of La Mesa. Assisted Replacement Medication Therapy Medical Specialists The Lodge of La Mesa (Transition Age Youth)
Borrego Health-Centro Medico El Cajon
New Found Homes ILF
Mission Academy
2
nd Chance
Alvarado Parkway Institute
Bayview Crisis Stabilization Unit
Volunteers in Medicine
Serving Seniors
HOME Program Historical Statistics
Client Enrollment
Quarter
Total
Clients
Served
New Clients Continuing
Clients
Q4 2020 56 n/a n/a
Q1 2021 108 61 47
Q2 2021 75 44 31
Q3 2021 86 44 31
Q4 2021 25 10 15
Q1 2022 69 48 21
Q2 2022 96 62 34
Q3 2022 73 38 35
Q4 2022 108 65 43
Q1 2023 71 28 43
Q2 2023 72 53 19
Q3 2023 71 43 28
Q4 2023 56 27 29
Q1 2024 43 29 14
Q2 2024 40 21 19
Q3 2024 39 24 15
Q4 2024 57 40 17
Q1 2025 95 24 71
Q2 2025 174 120 54
Q3 2025 172 98 74
Q4 2025 137 78 59
Grand
Total 1723 957 699
Calls for Service
Quarter Instances of
Service1 Calls for Service
Calls Officers
requested
HOME
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested
Officer
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested
PERT
assistance
Q4 2020 191 110 --- 1 1
Q1 2021 397 187 --- 0 1
Q2 2021 349 355 --- 0 0
Q3 2021 393 134 --- 0 0
Q4 2021 237 81 --- 0 0
Q1 2022 373 617 24 10 0
Q2 2022 626 657 11 22 4
Q3 2022 584 549 26 5 1
Q4 2022 744 417 16 3 0
Q1 2023 633 435 19 7 0
Q2 2023 494 384 16 2 0
Q3 2023 173 447 12 3 0
Q4 2023 274 391 24 3 0
Q1 2024 273 443 19 2 0
Q2 2024 261 473 13 9 0
Q3 2024 244 463 23 12 0
Q4 2024 358 448 10 5 0
Q1 2025 476 465 11 5 1
Q2 2025 358 631 16 7 0
Q3 2025 381 680 43 5 0
Q4 2025 349 505 41 5 1
Grand Total 8168 8872 324 106 9
1 Instances of service are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service.
Total People Housed 322
Services and Housing
Quarter
HOME
Rides
Direct Financial
Assistance
Clients who
Received Motel
Vouchers
Clients
Permanently
Housed
Households
Permanently
Housed
Clients
Temporarily
Housed
Households
Temporarily
Housed
Q4 2020 18 $ 3,357.00 7 5 --- 3 ---
Q1 2021 16 $ 10,506.00 7 --- 4 --- 19
Q2 2021 7 $ 4,967.00 9 8 7 --- 5
Q3 2021 144 $ 16,623.42 7 8 3 --- 5
Q4 2021 84 $ 1,071.40 0 12 11 --- 4
Q1 2022 92 $ 6,579.56 5 10 9 6 6
Q2 2022 96 $ 3,727.96 2 16 11 5 3
Q3 2022 68 $ 3,445.75 3 8 6 4 4
Q4 2022 69 $ 3,411.55 3 15 6 2 2
Q1 2023 56 $ 2,210.47 2 17 7 2 2
Q2 2023 59 $ 2,581.44 0 4 2 5 5
Q3 2023 59 $ 7,560.47 2 2 2 6 6
Q4 2023 91 $ 1,344.96 1 10 8 1 1
Q1 2024 52 $ 3,506.91 1 7 6 1 7
Q2 2024 86 $ 8,428.53 0 9 4 5 5
Q3 2024 61 $ 20,935.20 1 4 2 2 2
Q4 2024 56 $ 8,895.15 1 7 7 2 2
Q1 2025 79 $ 10,007.91 0 15 6 3 8
Q2 2025 138 $ 8,895.15 0 7 7 9 9
Q3 2025 129 $ 43,306.39 4 40 24 17 13
Q4 2025 69 $ 32,338.40 0 32 20 13 8
Grand Total 1529 $ 203,700.62 55 236 152 86 116
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
On May 27, 2025, the City Council approved a council-initiated request to provide quarterly updates to the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) to improve communication with residents and list the specific traffic calming measures requested. In addition, the following modifications to the City’s NTMP Matrix were to be incorporated:
1. Provide the traffic calming element being requested
2. Provide a description of the NTMP phases within the Matrix The following status report for Phases 1 through 3 is based on the City Council-approved NTMP Work Plan for 2025. Bold font indicates actions taken since September 23, 2025 report.
Phase 1 Traffic Calming Status (measures primarily consisting of signage, striping, and enforcement):
1. Eastridge Drive (Corolyn to Cinthia) Additional neighborhood outreach planned
2. Lemon Avenue (Nebo to Acacia) … completed (edgelines installed)
3. Lake Murray Blvd (Bob to Aztec) … no update
4. Jackson Drive (Lemon to La Mesa) … completed (edgelines installed)
5. Glen Street (La Mesa to Lemon) … in design
6. Glen Street (Lemon to Alpine) … no update
7. Palm Avenue (Echo to Pasadena) … in design
8. Toni Lane (Tower to Alamo) …completed (25 mph sign and legend at two locations installed)
9. Bruce Court … completed (25 mph sign and legend installed)
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
10. Lambda Lane … completed (25 mph sign and legend installed)
11. Date Avenue (Allison Ave to Acacia) … completed (raised pavement marker installed on centerline curve)
Phase 2 Traffic Calming Status (measures typically consist of meetings with the neighborhood, designing, and obtaining consensus for permanent traffic calming elements):
1. Dugan Ave (between Lake Murray and Laird St) … Received consensus (Vote) for a resident supported traffic calming design. The design approved by the neighborhood included the installation of six speed humps
2. Lois St (between Boulevard Dr and King St) … Received consensus (Vote) for a resident supported traffic calming design. The design approved by the neighborhood included the installation of four speed humps Phase 3 Traffic Calming Status (construction of traffic calming elements approved by neighborhood vote in Phase 2):
1. El Paso (between Lake Murray and Jackson Dr) …Traffic calming to be implemented includes flashing crosswalk, angled parking, and a roundabout Construction contact on Council agenda for award February 10, 2026.
2. El Paso (between Jackson Dr and Amarillo) … Traffic calming to be implemented includes raised pedestrian island, striping and speed radar signs. Construction contract on Council agenda for award February 10, 2026
3. Highwood Ave (between Cinnabar and Eastridge) … Traffic calming to be implemented includes chicanes, speed table, edgelines and speed radar signs.
Construction contact on Council agenda for award February 10, 2026
4. Safety Corridors (AB 43): Installations approved to proceed to implementation, adjacent to public schools, anticipated by Spring 2026.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
Temporary Speed Hump Program:
On June 24, 2025, the City Council approved consideration of implementing a temporary speed hump program as part of La Mesa’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.
An evaluation of two different speed humps has been underway and a proposed program will be presented to Council in March.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Michael Kinnard
Engineering Project Manager
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM RESOLUTIONS
DESCRIPTION: 1. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT FOR THE EL PASO STREET AND
HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION AND TRAFFIC
ENGINEERING SERVICES
2. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO
ARDURRA GROUP, INC. TO PROVIDE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET AND
HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
3. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE
ORDER 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC. FOR
ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
4. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP TO PROVIDE
ENGINEERING STAFF AUGMENTATION FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 2 of 5
SUMMARY:
Issues:
1. Should the City of La Mesa accept Bid 26-02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project, and awarding a construction contract including the El Paso/Dalhart roundabout bid alternate to Miramar General Engineering in the amount of $652,617.50?
2. Should the City of La Mesa authorize the issuance of a task order in the amount of $103,120 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide construction management and inspection services for the project?
3. Should the City of La Mesa authorize Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $139,708 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide additional traffic engineering services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program?
4. Should the City of La Mesa authorize the issuance of a task order in the amount of $86,688 to Parsons Transportation Group to provide engineering staff augmentation for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program? Recommendation:
1. Adopt the attached resolution accepting Bid 26-02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project, awarding a construction contract including the El Paso/Dalhart roundabout bid alternative to Miramar General Engineering in the amount of $652,617.50.
2. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance of a task order in the amount of $103,120 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide construction management and inspection services for Bid 26-02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project.
3. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing a Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $139,708 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide additional traffic engineering services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.
4. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance of a task order in the amount of $86,688 to Parsons Transportation Group for Engineering Staff Augmentation for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.
Fiscal Impact:
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 3 of 5
Funding for the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program contracts is available in the following accounts:
CONTRACTOR SERVICE FUNDING AMOUNT
Miramar General Engineering Construction CIP 8306 $652,617.50 Ardurra Group, Inc. CM and inspection CIP 8308 $103,120.00 Ardurra Group, Inc. Traffic engineering CIP 8308 $139,708.00 Parsons Transportation Group Staff augmentation CIP 8308 $86,688.00 TOTAL $982,133.50
City’s Strategic Goals:
Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe. Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community. Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
BACKGROUND:
The Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) was adopted by the City Council on January 13, 2004 and last year three segments on two streets were approved by the City Council to move to Phase 3 construction (see Attachment H) with the following scope of work:
El Paso (between Lake Murray and Jackson Dr) – The plan includes installing an all-way stop control at El Paso Street and Dalhart Ave, a crosswalk with flashers, restriping of the corridor and a roundabout (contingent on funding availability).
El Paso (between Jackson Dr and Amarillo) – The design includes installation of new radar speed feedback signs, striping and an upgraded traffic island with crosswalk upgrades.
Highwood Ave (between Cinabar and Eastridge) – The design includes a speed table, striping updates and a chicane system.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 4 of 5
DISCUSSION:
On December 11, 2025, a notice inviting bids was advertised and bid documents were distributed to 52 plan holders. On January 21, 2025, four bids were received electronically. The apparent responsive, responsible low bidder was determined to be Miramar General Engineering with a total base bid price of $301,067.50, and an additive price for the El Paso roundabout of $351,550.50, totaling $652,617.50. A summary of bid results is attached.
The engineer’s estimate for the project (base bid) was $320,000 and as there is $737,150 available of ARPA funding in CIP No. 8306, staff recommends including the El Paso/Dalhart roundabout into the construction project.
Contract time for completion of the base bid work is 40 working days and expected to begin in April and be completed in June. Contract time for completion of the project alternate bid (the roundabout) is an additional 40 working days with that work expected to begin in June and be completed by August.
A task order is recommended for Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide construction management services and traffic engineering services for the construction project.
The NTMP has proven to be a very popular public engagement/neighborhood quality of life improvement program and the City has been utilizing the services of Ardurra Group and Parsons Transportation group for traffic engineering and staff augmentation services.
To maintain the high level of responsiveness to citizen-driven requests for traffic calming and overall transportation-related issues, the need has been identified for additional funding to complete traffic projects on-hand and in the implementation queue. Both firms have been performing well and consequently staff recommends the issuance of contract change order to Ardurra Group for additional traffic engineering services to support other neighborhood traffic management plan projects in the traffic calming queue and a task order to Parsons Transportation Group to provide engineering staff augmentation for the overall La Mesa traffic calming program.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Bid 26- 02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project and authorizing a construction contract including the El Paso/Dalhart roundabout bid alternate in the amount of $652,617.50 to Miramar General Engineering.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance of a task order in the amount of $103,120 to Ardurra Group, Inc. for construction
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 5 of 5
management and inspection services for Bid 26-02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $139,708 to Ardurra Group, Inc. for additional traffic engineering services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance of a task order in the amount of $86,688 to Parsons Transportation Group for engineering staff augmentation services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Brianda De La Torre
Assistant Engineer
Attachments: A – Resolution – Bid Award to Miramar General Engineering B – Bid Results Tabulation
C – Resolution – Ardurra Task Order Const Mgt Services
D – Resolution – Ardurra CCO-1 Traffic Engineering Services E – Resolution – Parsons Task Order Staff Augment Services F – Proposal - Ardurra Const Mgt Services
G – CCO-1 – Ardurra Traffic Engineering
H – Proposal – Parsons Staff Augmentation
I – Project locations
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA ACCEPTING BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET AND HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT AND AWARDING A
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT INCLUDING THE EL PASO/DALHART
ROUNDABOUT BID ALTERNATE TO MIRAMAR GENERAL ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa adopted a Neighborhood Traffic Management program in February 2004 to provide engineering solutions, known as traffic calming measures, for managing traffic issues on residential streets, and established a formal process for handling requests for traffic calming measures;
WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, City Council issued Resolution 2024-020, approving the American Rescue Plan Act, Phase 4 funding expenditure spending plan, which included $737,150 for Citywide Traffic Calming Measures;
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, the City approved the El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue project from the NTMP to begin Phase III construction of all approved improvements determined during Phase II;
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2025, a notice inviting bids for project construction was advertised and bid documents were distributed to 52 plan holders; WHEREAS, the engineer’s estimate for the project base bid was $320,000; WHEREAS, on January 21, 2026, four bids were received and subsequently determined Miramar General Engineering as the lowest apparent bidder for a base bid of $301,067.50 and the El Paso/Dalhart roundabout additive of $351,550.50 for a project of total of $652,617.50; and WHEREAS, American Rescue Plan Act funding for Citywide Traffic Calming Measures is budgeted in Capital Improvement Project 8306.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a contract including the bid alternate with Miramar General Engineering to provide construction services for the El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Project in the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program for $652,617.50.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Bidders Base Bid Additive Bid Total
1 Miramar General Engineering $ 301,067.50 $ 351,550.00 $ 652,617.50 2 L C Paving & Sealing, Inc. $ 423,256.25 $ 302,647.50 $ 725,903.75 3 Palm Engineering Construction Co., Inc. $ 582,487.50 $ 398,690.00 $ 981,177.50 4 Tri-Group Construction & Development Inc $ 639,980.00 $ 959,720.00 $ 1,599,700.00 Engineer's Estimate $ 320,000.00 $ 320,000.00
Bid Tabulation
BID 26-02 El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Project All bids compared on the basis of the BASE BID ONLY.
ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BID 26-02, El PASO STREET AND HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City requires assistance with construction management and inspections specialized professional services for Bid 26-02 El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) during project construction; WHEREAS, in May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications, RFQ 25-01 for as-needed professional services;
WHEREAS, Ardurra Group, Inc. was selected as a qualified firm to provide construction management and inspection services;
WHEREAS, in September 2024, a Master Agreement was executed with Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide Construction Management and Inspection services; WHEREAS, funding for this task order is available in CIP 8308, Street Rehabilitation Project; and
WHEREAS, the City’s purchasing rules require the City Council’s approval for professional services contracts over $50,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Task Order with Ardurra Group, Inc to provide construction management and inspection services for Bid 26-02, El Paso Street and Highwood Avenue NTMP Project in the amount of $103,120.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
ATTACHMENT D
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC.,
FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City requires assistance with traffic engineering support services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) to support the City’s traffic calming program;
WHEREAS, in May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications, RFQ 25-01 for as-needed professional services;
WHEREAS, Ardurra Group, Inc. was selected as a qualified firm to provide traffic engineering services;
WHEREAS, in July 2025, the City awarded a task order in the amount of $46,512 to Ardurra Group, Inc. for traffic engineering services for the NTMP; WHEREAS, in January 2026, the encumbered funds for traffic engineering services for the NTMP were completely utilized necessitating additional funding to maintain high levels of responsiveness to citizen’s traffic calming concerns;
WHEREAS, funding to maintain this service is available in CIP 8308, Street Rehabilitation Project; and
WHEREAS, Administrative Instruction F-13 requires City Council approval when cumulative change orders for professional services exceed $50,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute Contract Change Order 1 with Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide additional traffic engineering services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program in the amount of $139,708.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
ATTACHMENT E
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP FOR
STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City requires assistance with engineering staff augmentation services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP);
WHEREAS, in May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications, RFQ 25-01 for as-needed professional services;
WHEREAS, Parsons Transportation Group, was selected as a qualified firm to provide engineering staff augmentation services;
WHEREAS, in July 2024, a master agreement was executed with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. to provide engineering staff augmentation services; WHEREAS, in January 2026, staff augmentation costs were projected to significantly increase based on the quantity of traffic engineering requests received and in process; WHEREAS, funding for the additional staff augmentation is available in CIP 8308, Street Rehabilitation Project; and
WHEREAS, the City’s purchasing rules require the City Council’s approval for professional services contracts over $50,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a task order with Parsons Transportation Group for engineering staff augmentation services for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program in the amount of $86,688.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com January 27, 2026
Mr. Michael Throne
Director of Public Works
City of La Mesa
8031 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91941
REFERENCE: FY 26 TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT
Dear Mr. Throne:
In accordance with your request, Ardurra Group, Inc. (Ardurra) is pleased to provide this proposal for Construction Management and Inspection services for the City of La Mesa (City) FY 26 Traffic Calming Project.
Our proposed scope of work will include the following:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Presented below is Ardurra’s proposed Detailed Scope of Work to be provided based on our understanding of the project requirements. Ardurra has assembled a comprehensive and detailed scope of work to accomplish the City’s project objectives and ensure a complete and well-coordinated construction management program that results in a project that is delivered on time and within budget.
Task 1 – Pre-Construction Phase Services
Task 1.1 – Pre-Construction Conference
Notify appropriate parties, schedule and conduct the Pre-Construction Conference with the Contractor.
The meeting shall cover the overall project objectives, responsibilities of key personnel and agencies, schedules, procedures for handling submittals, correspondence, utility relocations, local agency permit requirements, request for clarification, progress payments, change orders, and other pertinent topics.
Task 1.2 – Review Pre-Construction Submittals
Review the Contractor’s pre-construction submittals such as initial CPM schedule, schedule of values, staging plans, and bypass plans and provide comment to the City on the adequacy of those documents.
Task 1.3 – Coordinate with Outside Agencies/Stakeholders
Mr. Michael Throne
City of La Mesa
January 27, 2026
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com Provide coordination with outside agencies and property owners regarding upcoming construction.
Provide regular communication and coordinate any possible additional meetings that may be required to satisfy encroachment permit requirements or stakeholder concerns.
Task 2 – Construction Phase Services
Task 2.1 – Reports and Communications (Document Control) A. Project Document Control
Maintain field memoranda, transmittals, updated schedules, logs of shop drawings and other submittals, logs of requests for information, change orders, progress payment requests, progress meeting reports, compaction reports, daily inspection reports, required storm water inspection reports, and all other project correspondence. Project documentation will be kept digitally as well as hard copies, and files will be organized in a logical manner as approved by the City.
Task 2.2 – Construction Administration
A. Construction Progress Meetings
Schedule and conduct bi-weekly construction progress meetings with the Contractor(s) and the City.
Provide meeting agendas and discuss the schedule, near-term activities, clarifications and problems which need resolution, coordination with other Contractors, status of change orders, and safety issues.
Prepare minutes of the meetings with identified action items. Prepare and distribute the minutes to the attendees.
B. Project Coordination
Provide coordination between the Contractor, Agencies, Public Outreach Consultant, Private Properties and the City as needed to facilitate the construction process. Ardurra will ensure that the parties have up to date necessary information and documents such as shop drawings, submittals, plan revisions, bypass plans, and traffic control plan. A documentation tracking procedure will be developed to track the distribution of these documents.
C. Shop Drawings and Submittal Reviews
Coordinate submittal review and approval. Ardurra will be responsible for processing and monitoring the status of submittals. Ardurra will provide cursory review of the Contractor’s submittals for general conformance with the contract document requirements prior to sending the submittals to the design engineer. Submittals of a general nature will be reviewed and processed by the CM team at the City’s request. The CM team may also provide review of technical specifications of a general nature such as crushed rock, asphalt paving, and import.
Ardurra will log, track, and monitor shop drawings, calculations, data samples, submittals, and manuals from the Contractor. Shop drawings and submittals which significantly do not meet the specified requirements will be returned to the Contractor with comments for corrections and resubmittal.
Exception reports, which identify outstanding submittals or reviews needed, shall be prepared periodically.
D. Plans and Specifications Interpretation (RFI Processing)
Mr. Michael Throne
City of La Mesa
January 27, 2026
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com Review and respond to Contractor RFIs if of a general nature. Technical RFIs will be submitted to the project design engineer for response. Maintain a log of RFIs to ensure that written clarifications are provided to the Contractor in a timely manner. Responses to requests for changes to the design will be submitted to the City’s Project Manager and Design Engineer for response and approval.
E. Respond to Change Order Requests
Identify, prepare, log, and monitor Contractor or City initiated claims, changes, extra work, and change orders. Negotiate claims to an agreed Contractor/Consultant/City conclusion. Provide written recommendations to the City regarding the resolution of change orders and submit change orders to the City for approval. Prepare a report providing statement of claim, extra work, or change; background leading to the issue; resolution recommendation for action by the City. Prepare written justification and cost estimates for each change order that requires design modifications or clarifications, including revisions to the drawing, details, and specifications. Resolve claims, extra work, and change orders for changes to the work and obtain City approval.
F. Progress Payment Reviews
Prepare project related invoices and progress payments. Submit invoices to the City’s project manager with a recommendation stating the proper amount for payment using the Schedule of Values and actual quantities as a basis to prepare payment requests. Progress Payment review will also include evaluation of the monthly updated construction schedule and review of the project as-builts to verify that the Contractor is up to date. In addition, review of monthly progress payments will include review of the Contractor’s required inspections, testing, and reports as required by the project SWPPP and the Construction General Permit.
Task 2.3 – Construction Inspection Services
A. Daily Construction Monitoring
Provide full-time inspection and necessary specialty inspection to observe and document that the Contractor’s work is in compliance with the contract documents. Prepare daily reports of the construction activities including weather conditions, Contractor’s equipment and manpower, work performed, materials used, site visitors, note delays in work and reasons for the delays, and deficiencies. Prepare daily reports of deviations and non-conformance to specifications and provide a timely response. Perform technical inspection at the job site as required of materials and workmanship and discuss with the Contractor appropriate revisions to the methods and procedures used in performing the work. Observe and record all material deliveries to the site. Material certificates shall be verified and documented for compliance with plans, specifications, and approved shop drawings.
Prepare a detailed daily report summarizing all observations and work performed on site each day/shift.
B. Photo Documentation
Take and file construction documentation photographs on a regular basis. Maintain a digital photographic library of significant construction activities. Take additional photographs to document differing site conditions, change order claim items and any special or unique conditions as they arise.
C. Community Outreach
Mr. Michael Throne
City of La Mesa
January 27, 2026
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com Provide a central point of contact for stakeholders on the project and act as the City’s representative in the field. Meet with affected stakeholders regularly and keep a log of complaints with a description of the complaint and the measures taken to mitigate the complaint.
D. Labor Compliance Services
Verify DIR registration of prime and subcontractors. Coordinate the submittal of certified payroll records, fringe benefit records, and apprentice registration materials. Verify proper apprentice ratios are being met. Verify proper signage and wage rate determinations are displayed on the project.
Perform employee interviews as required by project funding conditions. Spot check certified payroll records for proper pay rates.
Task 3 – Post-Construction Phase Services
Task 3.1 – Project Closeout
Prepare detailed project punch lists at closeout of the project. Upon correction of deficiencies, schedule, coordinate, and conduct a final walk through prior to acceptance of work with the City. Verify work, testing, cleanup and demobilization is complete. Check and submit final payment requests after final walk through. Review and certify that the Contractor’s project record drawings are complete and accurate.
Task 3.2 – Final Project Documents
Within 30 days of filing of the notice of completion, provide a Construction Documentation notebook and electronic copy comprised of all approved shop drawings, material test reports, certifications, daily inspection reports, meeting minutes, conversation logs, and photo documentation. Also provide and submit one set of redlined as-built drawings.
FEE
Ardurra is pleased to present this estimated fee and estimated schedule for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the FY 26 Traffic Calming Project. We understand that services will be provided as half time (4 hours per day) or as requested by City staff for a 80 working day project.
Our estimated not to exceed fee for the proposed scope of work is $103,120.00 (One Hundred Three Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars). As part of this proposal, we have included a breakdown of anticipated hours by staff type that we feel will be dedicated to each task outlined in our scope. As stated above, we understand that services will be provided and billed for on a time and materials basis as they are requested by City staff. Should the City want us to provide services in excess of this estimate additional budget will need to be negotiated.
Construction Manager 12 hrs @ $260.00/HR $ 3,120.00
Resident Engineer 120 hrs @ $192.00/HR $ 23,040.00
Sr. Construction Observer 320 hrs @ $182.00/HR $ 58,240.00 Labor Compliance Specialist 120 hrs @ $156.00/HR $ 18,720.00 TOTAL $ 103,120.00
Mr. Michael Throne
City of La Mesa
January 27, 2026
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal and assist the City with this project. Please contact me at (858) 243-4977 should you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Scott Adamson, PE, QSD/P
Practice Director – SW Water CM/PM
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com November 26, 2025
Mr. Michael Kinnard
Engineering Project Manager
City of La Mesa
8031 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91941
REFERENCE: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES IN 2026
Dear Mr. Kinnard,
In accordance with your request, Ardurra Group, Inc. (Ardurra) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional traffic engineering and transportation planning services in the City of La Mesa (City). In order to best provide these services Ardurra has teamed with C2 Consulting Collective (C2 ).
This proposal letter outlines our proposed Scope of Work to provide focused, on-call traffic and traffic calming staff augmentation support services. These services can include flexible assistance for special assignments such as process- improvement initiatives, continuity with prior projects supported by key staff, and hands-on training or mentoring in traffic-engineering tools to ensure seamless service and knowledge transfer during staff transitions.
C2 is a full-service Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering, and Fire/Emergency Evacuation firm based in Southern California. They strive to move projects forward by building partnerships, leveraging technology, demonstrating technical excellence, and executing creative solutions. Walter B. Musial, the founder of C2 , has
over 25 years of experience as a registered Road Safety Professional (RSP), Professional Traffic Engineer (PE), and published researcher. He has built a team of experts at C2 with professional licenses in Traffic Engineering, Traffic Operations, and Civil Engineering.
Brian Damiani, PE, TE, will lead this assignment for C2 . Brian serves as the Transportation Planning Lead at C2, where he guides multimodal infrastructure planning, traffic impact analysis (TIA), and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) assessments for jurisdictions across California. He has helped shape local TIA and VMT guidelines and works closely with cities to develop practical, data-driven solutions tailored to their unique needs. Brian brings 16 years of experience delivering transportation projects across planning, environmental, and final design phases—with a strong focus on stakeholder engagement, CEQA/NEPA compliance, and policy development.
SCOPE OF WORK
This proposal assumes the following for the initial scope of work, starting January 1, 2026:
Mr. Michael Kinnard
City of La Mesa
November 26, 2025
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com Task 1 – On-Call Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Support (Up to 12 hours per week for 52 weeks/12 months)
Flexible, as-needed assistance for traffic engineering and transportation planning support at City Hall including special assignments, workflow improvements, and staff training; only actual hours worked will be billed. This proposal assumes up to 12 hours per week (8 hours in person at La Mesa City Hall and 4 hours of flexible support for field investigations, remote work, and additional meetings as directed by City staff.)
Staff augmentation support will begin January 1, 2026, and extend through December 31, 2026, unless otherwise modified. Additional hours or an extension beyond this period can be provided upon request and mutual agreement.
FEE
Ardurra is pleased to present this estimated fee for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning support. Our estimated not to exceed fee for the proposed scope of work is $139,708 (One hundred thirty-nine thousand, Seven Hundred Eight Dollars). Services will be billed on a time and materials basis as they are provided. As part of this proposal, we have included a breakdown of anticipated hours by staff type that we feel will be dedicated to the task outlined in our scope and the anticipated number of hours for each proposed staff member as they relate to the resource schedule presented above. Please note billing rates have been increased per the CPI index for each subsequent July per our contract. The CPI in July of 2025 was four (4) percent which is the percent increase of our rates in this proposal.
Project Management
Mr. Jennifer Rosales
Traffic & Transportation Group Leader 28 hrs @ $265.00/HR $ 7,420 Task 1 – On-Call Traffic and Traffic Calming Support
Mr. Brian Damiani
Transportation Planning Lead 624 hrs @ $212.00/HR $ 132,288 TOTAL $ 139,708
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal and assist the City with this project. Please contact me at (949) 216-6833 should you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Rosales, PE, PTOE
Traffic and Transportation Group Leader
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: - ISSUED: . UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SECTION 4216 & 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE @ 1-800-422-4133 TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: WWW.DIGALERT.ORG SCANNED BY: . DATE: . FILE LOCATION: . NTMP Project Locations No. Project Location 1 Highwood Ave 2 Highwood Ave 3 El Paso St 4 El Paso St 5 El Paso St Page 112 of 136 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: - ISSUED: . UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SECTION 4216 & 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE @ 1-800-422-4133 TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: WWW.DIGALERT.ORG SCANNED BY: . DATE: . FILE LOCATION: . Page 113 of 136 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: - ISSUED: . UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SECTION 4216 & 4217 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE @ 1-800-422-4133 TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: WWW.DIGALERT.ORG SCANNED BY: . DATE: . FILE LOCATION: . Page 114 of 136 ° MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 23
HWD W.O. #
GIS UPDATE:
CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. 46469
DESCRIPTION BY APPROVED FILMED
ORIGINAL
DATE
DATE
UTILITIES:
TRAFFIC:
DEVELOPMENT:
PUBLIC WORKS:
EL PASO STREET AND DALHART AVENUE ROUNDABOUT
CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA - PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION SHEET OF 25 SHEETS
THOMAS BROS. PG/GRID
CITY MAINTENANCE ZONE
DRAWING NUMBER
X
BENCHMARK DATA
DESCRIPTION: CITY OF LA MESA SURVEY CONTROL POINT NO. 3066Q02, 3 1/2" BRASS DISC FLUSH WITH GROUND
LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF JACKSON DRIVE AND NENTRA
STREET
RECORD FROM:
ELEVATION: 611.998 DATUM: NGVD 29
RECORD DRAWING
BY: RCE:
GIS UPDATED:
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED:
CITY ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR DATE
DATE:
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
civil engineers and land surveyors BULIDNG INSPECTOR DATE Snipes-Dyeassociates
9435.
C.I.P. NO.
26-02
PRIVATE CONTRACT
SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLAN FOR:
°
22 22
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AMENDING SECTION 12.44.130 OF THE
LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE INSTALLING A DISABLED
PERSONS PARKING SPACE AT 8855 FABIENNE WAY
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council approve the installation of a disabled parking space at 8855 Fabienne Way?
Recommendation:
Adopt the attached resolution, approving the installation of a disabled person parking space at 8855 Fabienne Way.
Fiscal Impact:
The cost to install the space is under $1,000 and funds are budgeted in Public Works Traffic Operations maintenance budget (3107-6420).
City’s Strategic Goals:
Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
BACKGROUND:
Requests for an on-street disabled persons parking space require possession of a valid disabled person placard, available on-street space, and no or limited available access from the private property. The homeowner has provided a valid disabled placard issued
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 2 of 2
by the State of California, has available on-street parking, and has limited accessible access to their property.
DISCUSSION:
The request for an on-street disabled persons parking space at 8855 Fabienne Way is from the homeowner. The homeowner’s child uses a wheelchair and needs full assistance entering and exiting vehicles.
There is a driveway located at this residence, but it has a steep slope and therefore is not suitable for the disabled member of the household to enter and exit vehicles. There is an area of flat driveway at the back of the house, but it is not suitable for the disabled member of the household because it is not on the same level of the residence is on. Additionally, the steep slope of the driveway prevents the residents from parking at the back of the home and helping the disabled resident to the appropriate entrance.
Consequently, the family needs close, manageable access to their home from the street.
A blue curb would allow the residents to utilize the sidewalk leading to their front entrance.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution amending Section 12.44.130 of the La Mesa Municipal Code installing a disabled persons parking space at 8855 Fabienne Way.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Michael Kinnard
Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Site Photographs
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AMENDING SECTION 12.44.130 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE INSTALLING A DISABLED PERSONS PARKING SPACE AT 8855 FABIENNE WAY
BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, as follows:
Section 12.44.130 of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following:
Street Side of Street Location Description or Address
Fabienne Way South One parking space located at 8855 Fabienne Way PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
Attachment B
Report to Mobility Commission
Date: February 4, 2026
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE
ORDER NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC. TO
PROVIDE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR HELIX WATER DISTRICT PIPELINE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:
Issues:
Should the City Council authorize Contract Change Order 1 in the amount of $47,320 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide as-needed encroachment permit inspection services for the Helix Water District CIP 21002 Pipeline Replacement Project?
Recommendation:
Adopt the attached resolution authorizing a Contract Change Order 1 in the amount of $47,320 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide as-needed encroachment permit inspection services for the Helix Water District CIP 21002 Pipeline Replacement Project .
Fiscal Impact:
Funds for the services are budgeted and available in the Engineering Professional Services Operating Account 3201-6430.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.
BACKGROUND:
In May 2024, the City advertised RFQ 25-01 for as-needed engineering consultant services. Ardurra Group, Inc. was selected as one of the qualified firms to provide on-call construction management services and on September 7, 2024, a master agreement was executed. The terms of the master agreement allow for the issuance of task orders to authorize specific items of work on an as-needed basis to the selected consultants.
In July 2025, Ardurra Group, Inc. was awarded a task order to provide as-needed encroachment permit inspection services for Helix Water District’s CIP 21002 Pipeline Replacement project. The scope of services included construction monitoring and storm water pollution prevention services.
DISCUSSION:
Ardurra Group, Inc. has provided as-needed encroachment permit inspection services for this project since the task order was issued. As the Helix project is still under construction, a change order is necessary to extend support and inspection services through the anticipated June 2026 completion.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $47,320 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide as-needed encroachment permit inspection services.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 10, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Carly Cubberley, PE
Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Contract Change Order 1
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., TO PROVIDE AS-NEEDED ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR THE HELIX WATER DISTRICT PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 21002)
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, in May 2024, Ardurra Group, Inc. was selected as one of the qualified firms to provide on-call traffic engineering services through a master agreement that allows the issuance of task orders to authorize specific items of work on an as-needed basis; WHEREAS, in July 2025, Ardurra Group, Inc. was awarded a task order for $29,750 to provide encroachment permit inspection services for the Helix Water District CIP 21002 Pipeline Replacement Project with a scope of services including construction monitoring and storm water pollution prevention inspection;
WHEREAS, Administrative Instruction F13 mandates that approval by the City Council is required for change orders when the aggregate contract value exceeds $50,000; and WHEREAS, funding for Contract Change Order 1 is budgeted in Engineering Professional Services Operating Account 3201-6430.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, adopts a resolution authorizing Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $47,320 to Ardurra Group, Inc. to provide as-needed encroachment permit inspection services for the Helix Water District Pipeline Replacement project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
RE Contract: Date:
P.O. No.:
Scott Adamson, Construction Program Management/Group Leader I, THE UNDERSIGNED CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT, have given careful consideration to the changes proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the price shown above.
Michael Throne, Director of Public Works
159.06%
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY: APPROVED BY:
This document shall become an amendment to the contract and all provisions for the contract will apply hereto. The contractor accepts this change order as full compensation for additional work and delay to the project caused by this change order. This change order was requested by the City/Contractor.
NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT (C + B + A) $ 77,070.00 % Change
$ 47,320.00
Total Change
NET CHANGE THIS CCO (+ or -) % Change 159.06%
TOTAL CCO's (+ or -) $ 47,320.00 % Change 159.06%
CCO's PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (+ or -) $ - % Change 0.00%
Mark Arapostathis, Mayor
ARDURRA GROUP, INC.
TO:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 47,320.00
$ 29,750.00
1 Additional Encroachment Inspection Services $ 47,320.00 Reso. No.: 2026-____
CITY OF LA MESA
You are hereby requested to comply with the listed changes in the contract plans and specifications. Furnish to the City of La Mesa as follows:
Item No.
Change in
Contract Price
2/10/2026
262047
Detailed Description of Changes & Quantities or Scope of Work Encroachment Inspection Services for Helix
Water CIP21002
CM-100133-25-8
Ardurra Group, Inc.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Task Order:
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92 123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com December2, 202 5
Mr. Michael Throne
City Engineer/Director of Public Works
City of La Mesa
8031 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91941
REFERENCE : PROPOSAL FOR HELIX WATER DISTRICT 2025 PIPELINE PROJECT (CIP21002) INSPECTION SERVICES – CCO NO. 1
Dear Mr. Throne:
In accordance with your request, Ardurra Group, Inc. (Ardurra) is pleased to provide this proposal for 2025 Helix Water District Pipeline Project (CIP21002)Additional Inspection services for the City of La Mesa (City).
Ardurra has reviewed the documents provided and prepared a proposed scope of work and an estimated fee to complete the proposed scope.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Field Observation/Inspections
Ardurra will provide as-needed field observation of the construction activities. Ardurra will serve as the primary point of contact on-site in representing the City Engineering staff. This task will entail the following major subtasks:
▪ Construction Monitoring: Review project site for compliance with the City encroachment permit, and approved traffic control plans. Review surface improvement installation and repair to verify work is being performed in accordance with City standards.
▪ SWPPP Inspection: Provide site inspections to verify that proper BMPs are being utilized on the project site and prepare written reports at the required frequency for filing with the City’s stormwater compliance program.
FEE
Based on our understanding of the project, and as directed by City staff, Ardurra has prepared an estimated initial fee for continuedservices. We understand that the City is additionally requesting that we provide a proposed project budget to include services roughly from the beginning of December 202 5 through the beginning of June 202 6 (Approximately Twenty Six Weeks). We have estimated that our staff will spend approximately 10 hours per week providing services through that time period. Ardurra also unde rstands that these services will be provided on an As-needed basis as requested by the City of La Mesa staff. The fee for this project will be billed on a “Time and Materials” basis andinvoiced monthly. The increasedbudget will not be exceeded without prior negotiation with the City.
Mr. Michael Throne
City of La Mesa
December2, 202 5
9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 230 | San Diego, CA 92123 | 858.413.2400 | www.ardurra.com Ardurra requests a total not-to-exceed fee of $ 47 ,32 0.00 (Forty Sevin Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Dollars). This fee is all inclusive of vehicle, mileage, computer, testing equipment, and all other necessary equipment and materials to perform the required tasks. A breakdown of the fee is as follows:
▪ Field Observation/Inspection
Senior Construction Observer 260 hrs @ $182.00/HR $ 47,320 .00 TOTAL $ 47 ,32 0.00
We sincerely appreciate the opportunities to provide this proposal and assist the City with this project. Please contact me at (858) 243-4977 should you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Scott Adamson, PE, QSD/P
Construction Management – Group Leader
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares and Councilmember Laura Lothian VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO DRAFT ADVOCACY
LETTERS TO STATE LEGISLATORS AND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA
CITIES (CAL CITIES) REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO
STRENGTHEN STATEWIDE REGULATION, OVERSIGHT, AND
ENFORCEMENT FOR LICENSED AND UNLICENSED SOBER LIVING
FACILITIES AND RESIDENTIAL DETOX FACILITIES (2025-2026
LEGISLATIVE SESSION)
Direct staff to prepare and transmit advocacy letters to the City’s state legislative representatives, including but not limited to Senator Weber, Assemblymember Blakespear, Assemblymember Sharp-Collins, and relevant Orange County legislative representatives, as well as to Cal Cities requesting that they take action during the 2025-2026 California Legislative Session to strengthen statewide regulation, oversight, and enforcement related to licensed and unlicensed sober living homes, residential detox facilities, and similar residential recovery/treatment operations.
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Vice Mayor Cazares and Councilmember Lothian
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE CITY COUNCIL’S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY OF LA MESA
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS, INCLUDING SAFE COMMUNITY,
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY, LIVABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND
AMENITIES, AND HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, WHICH
GUIDE CITY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY
EFFORTS
Please find the proposed resolution attached.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
REAFFIRMING THE CITY COUNCIL’S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY’S
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS, INCLUDING SAFE COMMUNITY, FINANCIAL
SUSTAINABILITY, LIVABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND AMENITIES, AND
HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, WHICH GUIDE CITY POLICIES,
PROGRAMS, AND LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY EFFORTS
WHEREAS, in September 2023, the City Council adopted the 2023-2028 Citywide Strategic Plan that established the City’s vision, priorities, and goals to guide City operations, resource allocation and decision-making;
WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan goals support a community where residents and visitors feel safe, services are delivered in a fiscally responsible manner, infrastructure and amenities meet community needs, and City operations are carried out with professionalism and accountability;
WHEREAS, the goal of livability reflects the City Council’s commitment to promoting a high quality-of-life for current and future generations who call La Mesa home; WHEREAS, some community challenges and quality-of-life concerns require coordination and action beyond the authority of local government and may be addressed through state-level policy, regulation, and oversight;
WHEREAS, the City Council has identified growing and persistent challenges affecting neighborhood well-being, including impacts associated with licensed and unlicensed sober living homes, residential detox facilities, and similar residential recovery or treatment operations; WHEREAS, existing state laws and regulatory frameworks substantially limit the ability of local governments to effectively regulate, monitor, and enforce standards related to the operation, concentration, and oversight of such uses;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lack of adequate state-level regulation, oversight, constrains the City’s ability to respond to community impacts, creating a need for legislative reform to better balance individual recovery needs with neighbor well-being; WHEREAS, meaningful and durable solutions to these challenges require clear, consistent, and enforceable state policy, including strengthened oversight, accountability, and enforcement mechanisms that support local governments in protecting residents, neighborhoods, and community quality of life;
WHEREAS, in 2025, the City entered into an agreement with Townsend Public Affairs (TPA) to provide legislative advocacy and grant-writing services to support the City’s goals; WHEREAS, concurrent with this reaffirmation, the City Council has directed staff to direct and transmit advocacy letters to state legislative representatives and the League of California Cities during the 2025-2026 California Legislative Session on matters affecting neighborhood well-being; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to clearly communicate to the community that the Strategic Plan goals remain the foundation for City decision-making, including policy development, operational priorities, and legislative advocacy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:
1. The City Council reaffirms its commitment to the City’s Strategic Plan and its five goals:
Safe Community, Financial Sustainability, Livability, Infrastructure and Amenities, and High-Performing Organization.
2. Legislative advocacy is an appropriate and necessary tool to advance the City’s Strategic Plan goals and to address issues that impact community livability and neighborhood wellbeing.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)