La Mesa City Council
February 24, 2026

LA MESA CITY COUNCIL, LA MESA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY

OF LA MESA SUCCESSOR AGENCY
AGENDA

A Regular Meeting of the City Council, a Special Meeting of the La Mesa Public Financing Authority, and a Special Meeting of the City of La Mesa Successor Agency

Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2026, 6:00 p.m.

Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:

Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.gov), the City's YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/cityoflamesa) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:

The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:

Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84472650722
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 900-6833 or (253) 215-8782 Webinar ID: 844 7265 0722 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.

Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however, any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot be combined or yielded to another speaker. *Live Remote Public Comment ONLY permitted during Councilmember teleconferencing pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953 (AB 2449).
*Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.

Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Human Resources Department 48 business hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].

Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo ID or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER DILLARD

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PRESENTATION

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.

If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS

8.1 INTERVIEW OF AN APPLICANT FOR THE UNSCHEDULED VACANCY

ON THE ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
1 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.8)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.8.

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2026
4 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

10.3 2026 BOARD AND COMMISSION WORK PLANS 12
• COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
• HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
• LA MESA COMMUNITY PARKING COMMISSION
• PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Receive and file.

10.4 BUDGET MONITORING QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
25 Staff Reference: Ms. Esenwein
Recommended Motion:

Receive and file.

10.5 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MILITARY USE POLICY AND

CONTINUED USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT FOR POLICE
SERVICES PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 7071 ET SEQ)
39 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10.6 POLICE CHIEF’S QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
84 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Receive and file.

10.7 RESOLUTION AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030 (6.7) OF THE LA

MESA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO EL

PASO STREET AT AMARILLO AVENUE AS A THROUGH STREET
99 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10.8 SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER 2026 COMMUNITY CLEAN

ENERGY PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION
131

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT
APPLICATION TO THE SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER 2026

COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY GRANT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE

FUNDING FOR THE LA MESA E-BIKE INCENTIVE PROGRAM AND IF

AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE

PROJECT
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

11. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY -

SUCCESSOR AGENCY
(Items 11.1 through 11.3)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 11.1 through 11.3.

11.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

11.2 RESOLUTION ADOPTING (1) THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025, AND (2) THE ANNUAL

ADJUSTMENT FACTORS USED TO CALCULATE THE

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
136
Staff Reference: Ms. Esenwein
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution pursuant to Propositions 4 and 111, establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, using the growth factor for new Non-Residential Construction in the City of La Mesa, and the change in population in San Diego County, as the annual adjustment factors used to compute the Appropriations Limit.

11.3 RESOLUTION ADOPTING (1) THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026, AND (2) THE ANNUAL

ADJUSTMENT FACTORS USED TO CALCULATE THE

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
142
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution pursuant to Propositions 4 and 111, establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, using the change in California’s per capita personal income and the change in population in San Diego County, as the annual adjustment factors used to compute the Appropriations Limit.

12. COUNCIL INITIATED

12.1 ADVOCACY LETTERS REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION 148

CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO DRAFT ADVOCACY

LETTERS TO STATE LEGISLATORS AND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA

CITIES (CAL CITIES) REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO

STRENGTHEN STATEWIDE REGULATION, OVERSIGHT, AND

ENFORCEMENT FOR LICENSED AND UNLICENSED SOBER LIVING
FACILITIES AND RESIDENTIAL DETOX FACILITIES (2025-2026
LEGISLATIVE SESSION) – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND

COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN

12.2 REAFFIRMING COMMITMENT TO THE CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
149

CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING
THE CITY COUNCIL’S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY OF LA MESA

STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS, INCLUDING SAFE COMMUNITY,

FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY, LIVABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND

AMENITIES, AND HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, WHICH

GUIDE CITY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND LEGISLATIVE
ADVOCACY EFFORTS – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND

COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN

13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)

14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))

15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS

16. ADJOURNMENT
DATE: February 24, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: INTERVIEW OF AN APPLICANT FOR THE UNSCHEDULED VACANCY

ON THE ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
The Arts and Culture Commission currently has a vacancy for the Musical Arts Representative. Attached is a brief summary outlining the vacancy requirements, the number of openings, and the name of the applicant seeking appointment. The applicant has been invited to attend the meeting and provide a brief, three-minute presentation highlighting their qualifications and interest in serving.

The City Clerk will call the applicant forward for the presentation. Following the presentation, you will have the opportunity to ask questions, if desired.

The appointment will be made at the City Council meeting on March 10.

Attachment

Arts and Culture Commission: One (1) position – four-year term • One appointee will fill the vacancy with term expiring June 30, 2026 and represents the musical arts.
*Pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 2.87, Arts and Culture Commission: “If these particular appointments cannot be made and consequently vacancies occur, the remaining vacancies may be appointed at large.”
At-Large (A) Visual Arts (VA)
Performing Arts (PA) Musical Arts (MA)
The Commission shall consist of seven appointed members as follows:
• Two members to be art educators (one kindergarten through 8th grade, one 9th grade through college)
• One member to represent the visual arts; one member to represent the performing arts • One member to represent the musical arts
• Two members to be at large.

Members shall be either a La Mesa resident, employed at a place of business in La Mesa with a direct relationship to the Arts and Culture Commission membership categories, OR serve in a volunteer capacity at a non-profit organization in La Mesa with a direct relationship to the arts and Culture Commission membership categories
First Appointed Number of Terms
Guthre Leonard (MA)

THE APPLICATION IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

1 La Mesa City Council
Meeting Minutes
Date:

Location:

February 10, 2026, 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki

Absent: Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items may be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER DILLARD

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council, and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

2 Council Initiated Items 11.1 and 11.2 were deleted from the agenda and scheduled for consideration at the next City Council meeting.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 CITY TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT
City Treasurer Strabone made a presentation regarding the investment earnings for the quarter ending December 31, 2025.

Following Council questions and comments, no action was taken.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Dianne Osterling spoke on the importance of government transparency, considering long-term impacts rather than short-term fixes, and keeping priorities in focus.

Vaughn Rios spoke regarding the undeveloped park at Waite Drive and Murray Hill Road and expressed concern that the distribution of park funds does not appear equitable.

Barbie Wheeler spoke regarding ongoing issues related to a house on Bellflower Drive.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

8.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND/OR REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE CITY’S COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
Mayor Arapostathis nominated the following individuals for appointment and/or reappointment to the City's Community Police Oversight Board:

Jeffrey McIllwain, Police Beat 1 representative
Elizabeth Morgante, Police Beat 2 representative
Clifton Ewbank, Police Beat 3 representative
Todd McCully, Police Beat 4 representative
Aaron Landau, Advocate for People Experiencing Homelessness, Substance Abuse, Mental Health, or Other Social Issues representative

3 Resolution No. 2026-009
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Approve the appointment of Elizabeth Morgante and the reappointments of Jeffrey McIllwain, Clifton Ewbank, Todd McCully, and Aaron Landau to the Community Police Oversight Board and adopt the Resolution confirming the appointments and reappointments.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (1): Vice Mayor Cazares
Approved (4 to 0)

8.2 RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE

UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION

COMMISSION
City Clerk Wiegelman explained the nomination process for the Parks and Recreation Commission.

The Council began the open nomination process for one position on the Parks and Recreation Commission.

City Clerk Wiegelman announced the nominations as follows:

Round 1:

Mayor Arapostathis nominated Jonathan Austin
Councilmember Dillard nominated Jonathan Austin
Councilmember Lothian nominated Jonathan Austin
Councilmember Suzuki nominated Jonathan Austin
City Clerk Wiegelman announced that Jonathan Austin had received a majority nomination.

Resolution No. 2026-010
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Suzuki
Approve the appointment of Jonathan Austin to the Parks and Recreation Commission and adopt the Resolution confirming the appointment.

4 For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (1): Vice Mayor Cazares
Approved (4 to 0)

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Dianne Osterling spoke on Item 10.3.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.11)
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 10.5).

Councilmember Dillard requested Item 10.7 be pulled for separate consideration.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Suzuki
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.11, except for Item 10.7.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (1): Vice Mayor Cazares
Approved (4 to 0)

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2026
Approve.

10.3 2026 BOARD AND COMMISSION WORK PLANS
 ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
 COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND VETERANS COMMISSION

5  ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
 MOBILITY COMMISSION
 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
Receive and file.

10.4 ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY OF LA MESA INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Approve.

10.5 *APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
REPEALING LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (LMMC) CHAPTER 18.18 –

SIDEWALK CAFES
Ordinance No. 2026-2926
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

10.6 PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY QUARTERLY REPORT
(OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
Receive and file.

10.8 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY
REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 - DECEMBER 2025)
Receive and file.

10.9 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

RESOLUTIONS
Resolution Nos. 2026-011, 2026-012, 2026-013, and 2026-014 Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET AND

HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT AND AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT INCLUDING THE EL

PASO/DALHART ROUNDABOUT BID ALTERNATE TO

MIRAMAR GENERAL ENGINEERING
Resolution No. 2026-011

6 Adopt Resolution.
b. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO ARDURRA
GROUP, INC., FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BID 26-02, EL PASO STREET

AND HIGHWOOD AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
Resolution No. 2026-012
Adopt Resolution.
c. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., FOR TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Resolution No. 2026-013
Adopt Resolution.
d. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER TO PARSONS

TRANSPORTATION GROUP FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION

SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Resolution No. 2026-014
Adopt Resolution.

10.10 RESOLUTION AMENDING SECTION 12.44.130 OF THE LA MESA

MUNICIPAL CODE INSTALLING A DISABLED PERSONS PARKING
SPACE AT 8855 FABIENNE WAY
Resolution No. 2026-015
Adopt Resolution.

10.11 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO ARDURRA GROUP, INC., TO PROVIDE AS-NEEDED

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE HELIX

WATER DISTRICT PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 21002)
Resolution No. 2026-016
Adopt Resolution.

7 10.7 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (HOME)
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025 – DECEMBER
2025)
Councilmember Dillard commented on the change in the number of individuals assisted between 2024 and 2025.

Chief Sweeney commented on the efforts that contributed to these improvements.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Councilmember Dillard
Seconded By Councilmember Suzuki
Receive and file.

For (4): Mayor Arapostathis, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (1): Vice Mayor Cazares
Approved (4 to 0)

11. COUNCIL INITIATED

11.1 ADVOCACY LETTERS REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION

CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO DRAFT ADVOCACY

LETTERS TO STATE LEGISLATORS AND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA

CITIES (CAL CITIES) REQUESTING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO

STRENGTHEN STATEWIDE REGULATION, OVERSIGHT, AND

ENFORCEMENT FOR LICENSED AND UNLICENSED SOBER LIVING
FACILITIES AND RESIDENTIAL DETOX FACILITIES (2025-2026
LEGISLATIVE SESSION) – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND

COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN
This item was deleted from the agenda.

11.2 REAFFIRMING COMMITMENT TO THE CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS

CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE
CITY COUNCIL’S COMMITMENT TO THE CITY OF LA MESA

STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS, INCLUDING SAFE COMMUNITY,

FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY, LIVABILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND

8 AMENITIES, AND HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, WHICH

GUIDE CITY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY EFFORTS – VICE MAYOR CAZARES AND COUNCILMEMBER

LOTHIAN
This item was deleted from the agenda.

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions, and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

13. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
There were no reports.

14. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 6:53 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk

DATE: February 24, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: BOARD AND COMMISSION WORK PLANS
At the start of each calendar year, the city’s Boards and Commissions meet to update their respective Work Plans. The Work Plans provide a roadmap for the major initiatives and projects each commission will work to achieve over the year.

Attachments:

A. Community Police Oversight Board
B. Historic Preservation Commission
C. La Mesa Community Parking Commission
D. Planning Commission

COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
1 FY 2026 Work Plan
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
● Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe ● Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability ● Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home ● Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community ● Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community
Staffing Department: City Manager’s Office

GOALS DUE

DATE TRACKING MILESTONES STATUS
Work Plan Item 1: Continue to collect data to gather information for the purpose of measuring change over time
1 Continue to collect data (i.e.
arrests, stop data, etc.) and use
RIPA and TrueNorth Community
Survey data to gather information
to measure change over time.

Ongoing

1.1 Use data sources such as RIPA,
TrueNorth Community Survey, and
along with other sources to analyze data
and report results.

1.2 Present update on data collection to
CPOB once per year.

Ongoing
Work Plan Item 2: Continue to evaluate LMPD policies and provide ongoing recommendations 1 Evaluate and recommend
policies including use of force,
officer training, de-escalation,
employee wellness, compliance
with health and safety
standards, and compliance with
the Racial and Identity Profiling
Act ("RIPA").
2 Review recommendations from
the Independent Police Auditor
regarding investigations.

Ongoing

1.1 Reconvene ad-hoc group or
subcommittees.

1.2 Receive written information from LMPD
on implemented recommendations.

1.3 Review implemented recommendations
and work with LMPD to implement
remaining After Action Report
recommendations.

1.4 Make recommendations to LMPD based
on the continued changes to RIPA data.

Ongoing

1. Adopt policies that promote
police community relations and
encourage the use of new, less
lethal technologies.

Ongoing

1.1. Consider best practices and discuss
community relations initiatives and less
lethal technologies with the Chief of
Police.

1.2 Receive presentations and updates
from LMPD regarding implementation of
new policies and community relations
initiatives.

Ongoing

COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
2 Work Plan Item 3: Receive ongoing training and continuing educational training for all new and current CPOB members
1 Receive confidentiality training
(from legal counsel) for the
purpose of reviewing personnel
or other documents that are
protected by privacy laws.

Ongoing

1.1 Continue receiving updated training by
December 31, 2026. Add Discussion
Item regarding training dates throughout
the year to a future CPOB agenda
(board meeting).

Ongoing
2 Receive training on LMPD
policies and procedures,
including officer training,
vehicular stops, arrests, and use
of force including hands on
training opportunities.

Ongoing 2.1 Continue receiving updated training by
December 31, 2026.

Ongoing
3 Receive training on CommunityOriented Policing. Ongoing 3.1 Continue receiving updated training by December 31, 2026.

Ongoing
4 Receive training on LMPD hiring
practices and employee wellness. Ongoing 4.1 Continue receiving updated training by December 31, 2026.

Ongoing
5 Receive training from other
qualified agencies, professional
organizations (i.e. National
Association for Civilian Oversight
of Law Enforcement "NACOLE"),
etc.

Ongoing 5.1 Continue receiving updated training by
December 31, 2026.

Ongoing
Work Plan Item 4: Maintain a program for the accessibility and mediation of the complaint process 1 Determine effective outreach and
messaging regarding the
complaint process.

Ongoing

1.1 Identify strategies and platforms to
utilize.

1.2 Work with City staff to implement
outreach and messaging strategies.

Ongoing
2 Review and evaluate outreach
and messaging strategies as
necessary.

Ongoing 2.1 Review and evaluate as necessary. Ongoing
3 Review and update the Mediation
Policy as needed. Ongoing 3.1 Review and evaluate as necessary. Ongoing

COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
3 Work Plan Item 5: Develop and recommend community outreach programs and alternative social service and crime-prevention policies regarding policing in La Mesa 1 Identify ideas for LMPD and
CPOB to participate in activities
that bridge the gap and improve
relationships with people of color.

Ongoing

1.1 Create Subcommittee and/or select
CPOB board members to develop and
recommend draft programs as needed.

1.2 Work with LMPD to implement activities.

Ongoing
2 Update and maintain webpage
for CPOB as necessary and
develop PSA and social media
outreach.

Ongoing

2.1 Identify materials and topics to be added
to the webpage such as use of license
plate reader technology, use of drones,
RIPA, human trafficking, gun storage
and safety, use of military equipment,
PERT qualifications, and any other
relevant topics, policies or procedures in
addition to handbooks, forms, bylaws,
work plan, etc.

Ongoing
3 Form a sub-group to stay
informed about the City’s
approach to social services and
crime-prevention, monitor
updates, and recommend
adjustments as needed to the
Chief of Police, Mayor, City
Council, and City Manager.

Ongoing

3.1 Orient and educate CPOB regarding
which current social service and crime
prevention policies are currently in place
(Homeless Outreach and Mobile
Engagement "HOME" Program, Mobile
Crisis Response Team "MCRT" for
example).

3.2 Present recommended policies and
strategies to CPOB for comments and
feedback.

3.3 Incorporate comments and feedback
into recommended policies and
strategies and bring them back to CPOB
for approval (if necessary).

Ongoing
Work Plan Item 6: Provide annual public reports to La Mesa City Council and City Manager 1 In conjunction with the
Independent Police Auditor,
provide annual public reports to
City Council and City Manager
on the number and types of
complaints reviewed and the
CPOB's response, investigative
findings, analysis, and police
progress on CPOB
recommendations.

Ongoing

1.1 Schedule item on CPOB agenda as
needed to discuss, review, and finalize
each public report.

1.2 Determine which two months each fiscal
year to present public report to City
Council.

Reports
submitted and
ongoing

COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
4 Work Plan Item 7: Continue working with the Chief of Police to engage in LMPD hiring process when possible and offer recommendations regarding the hiring process, exams, and the interview process

1. Continue working with the Chief
of Police to engage in LMPD
hiring process when possible
and offer recommendations
regarding the hiring process,
exams, and the interview
process.

Ongoing

1.1 Invite CPOB members to participate in
the oral interviews for LMPD applicants.

1.2 Seek to obtain demographic data on
applicants that pass or fail various
testing elements: written exam, oral
interview, physical abilities test,
background investigation, psychological
examination, and medical examination.

1.3 Conduct full review of "automatic" and
"potentially disqualifying" background
issues. Consider adding automatic
disqualifiers such as posting hate
speech on social media or conducting
themselves inappropriately or in a
manner that discredits the profession,
on social media or otherwise.

1.4 Research the various options available
that satisfy the P.O.S.T. requirements
for the psychological exam.

1.5 Research innovative ways to target a
diverse applicant pool.

1.6 Reach out to Administration of Justice
programs at Grossmont College and
Southwestern College to see if there are
any roles (instructor, guest lecturer,
career fairs) that LMPD personnel can
assist with.

1.7 Research the possibility of reinstituting
an Explorer/Cadet program.

CPOB
participated in
recruitments;
ongoing
efforts
Work Plan Item 8: Collaborate with the IPA to review audits of LMPD investigations

1. Collaborate with the IPA to
review audits of LMPD
investigations.

Ongoing

1.1 Review of audits of LMPD investigations
with the IPA only after policies and
procedures are approved by City
Council.

Completed;
audits
ongoing

2.30.010 – Creation and purpose.
(a) There is hereby permanently created the community police oversight board (hereinafter referred to as the "CPOB").

The purpose of the CPOB is to advise the chief of police, mayor, city council, and city manager on the administration of the La Mesa Police Department and on matters of public safety within the city. (b) The CPOB shall function as a means of community participation and oversight by directing and reviewing audits, and by reviewing and recommending policies, practices and programs designed to bring about community policing that is sensitive, effective, and responsive to the needs of the city and its residents. (c) The CPOB shall promote and encourage open communication and cooperation between the La Mesa Police Department and residents of the city, recognizing that policing the City of La Mesa is a shared responsibility. The CPOB shall also develop and make recommendations directed toward informing the community of its rights and responsibilities when coming into contact with police officers.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
 Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
 Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
 Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.  High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.

Staffing Department: Community Development

GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING MILESTONES STATUS
1 Ordinance/Policy
Updates
Upon City
Council
Direction
 Develop an ordinance amendment to
require a review process for properties
50 years or older and assess
community support for the ordinance.
 Update historic district eligibility criteria,
including Mills Act eligibility for
contributing resources.

Subject to
City
Council
Direction
2 Update Historic
Resources Inventory
On-going and
as staffing
support
permits
 Continue field survey and research with
assistance from SDSU/LMHS.
 Develop a phased program to
implement update procedures.
 Develop assessment ranking criteria.
 Bring completed submissions forward
for consideration.
 Prioritize Date Avenue Historic District
contributors for current inventory efforts.

On-going
3 Improve public
understanding of
historic preservation
On-going and
as staffing
support
permits
 Develop outreach tools, such as a web
page, story maps, and brochures to
promote the City’s historic preservation
program and the benefits of historic
preservation.

On-going

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
4 Regular Duties as
identified in LMMC

25.01.060.G
As-needed
 Continue to review applications for
Certificates of Appropriateness
 Continue to recommend to the City
Council requests for local historic
landmark designation
 Encourage the protection,
enhancement, appreciation and use of
structures of historical, cultural,
architectural, community or aesthetic
value.

On-going
LMMC 25.01.060 - Historic preservation commission.

G. Powers and Duties. The Commission shall have the power and duty to:

1. Conduct a continuing survey of all cultural resources in the City which the Commission, on the basis of information available or presented to it, has reason to believe may be eligible for designation as a historic landmark or historic district or for recognition as a structure of merit.

2. Review the La Mesa Historic Resources Inventory according to the criteria set forth in the Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan.

3. Recommend to the City Council amendments to the La Mesa Historic Resources Inventory.

4. Recommend to the City Council that certain areas, places, buildings, structures, natural features, works of art or other improvements having significant historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological, community or aesthetic value as part of the heritage of the City be designated as a historic landmark or historic district.

5. Maintain a local register of designated landmarks and historic districts within the City.

6. Approve or disapprove, in whole or in part, applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness pertaining to alteration, modification, or removal of any exterior architecture feature of a designated landmark or improvement within a historic district.

7. Adopt guidelines to be used by the Commission in reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness.

8. Review and comment upon applications for demolition permits pertaining to designated cultural resources and applications for demolition and alteration permits for cultural resources included in the La Mesa Historic Resources Inventory.

9. Explore means for protection, retention and use of any designated or potential landmark including, but not limited to, appropriate legislation and financing.

10. Recommend and encourage the protection, enhancement, appreciation and use of structures of historical, cultural, architectural, community or aesthetic value which have not been designated as landmarks but are deserving of recognition as structures of merit so as to emphasize their importance in the lifestyle of La Mesa.

11. Encourage public understanding of an involvement in the unique architectural and environmental heritage of the City through educational and interpretative programs. Such may include, but shall not be limited to, lectures, tours, walks, reports, publications, films, open houses, special events.

12. Encourage private efforts to acquire property and raise money on behalf of historic preservation; however, the Commission is specifically denied the power to acquire property or invest therein for or on behalf of itself or the City.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

13. Render advice and guidance on any structure at the request of the property owner as time permits (i.e., painting, color, materials, landscaping, fencing, lighting). This advice shall not be construed to impose any controls, but shall be offered in a spirit of friendly help.

14. Investigate and report to the City Council on the use of various federal, state, local or private funding sources and mechanisms available to promote historic resource preservation in the City.

15. Cooperate with local, county, state and federal governments in the pursuit of the objectives of historic preservation.

16. Implement other historic preservation plans and programs including, but not limited to, those listed as Complementary Programs in the General Plan Element.

17. Prepare or cause to be prepared nominations to the National Register of Historic Places, as time permits.

18. Consult with professionals and experts in fields such as archaeology, paleontology, history, preservation, architecture, design and engineering whenever such consultation is desired or necessary.

COMMUNITY PARKING COMMISSION
E:\Ldedmon\Parking Operations\Parking Commission\Work Plan\2026\ Work Plan
Calendar Year 2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
 Safe Community: Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Financial Sustainability: Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.
 Livability: Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
 Infrastructure and Amenities: Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.  High-Performing Organization: Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.

Staffing Department: City Manager’s Office

GOALS DUE DATE

TRACKING

MILESTONES STATUS

1. Repair & Maintenance of
Parking Lots
*Supports CAP Measure(s):

T-1: Bicycle Infrastructure
Development
By end of 2026
calendar year
1a. Complete
assessment of all
municipal lots
Annually

2. Research new parking
management technology to
replace coin-only meters and
possibly smart meters on-street
and in municipal lots
*Supports CAP Measure(s):

T-3: Transportation Demand
Management
Ongoing 2a. Research
technology options
2b. Make
recommendation to
Council
Ongoing

3. Review of Parking Meter and
Parking Permit Pricing every two
years
*Supports CAP Measure(s):

T-3 Transportation Demand
Management
Biennial 3a. Research parking
meter and parking
permit pricing
3b Determine a metric
to increase meter rates
3c. Make
recommendation to
Council
Ongoing

4. Conduct Visitor Parking Survey
*Supports CAP Measure(s):

T-3: Transportation Demand
Management
Annual 4a. Complete survey By end of 2026
calendar year

COMMUNITY PARKING COMMISSION
E:\Ldedmon\Parking Operations\Parking Commission\Work Plan\2026\

5. Consider Parking Master Plan
*Supports CAP Measure(s):

T-3: Transportation Demand
Management
Ongoing 5a. Determine
feasibility
5b. Develop scope of
work, including
expansion of Parking
District One
By end of 2026
calendar year

6. Research the expansion of
Parking District One
Annual 6a. Collect data for
GIS mapping of district
6b. Conduct GIS
analysis
6c. Make
recommendation to
Council
Ongoing
La Mesa Municipal Code

2.80.080 - Powers and duties.

The La Mesa community parking commission shall exercise the powers and duties as provided in this title. In addition, the commission may consider other parking issues as directed by the city council of the city of La Mesa and as set forth within the organization, rules, and procedures of the La Mesa Community Parking Commission.

PLANNING COMMISSION
1 | P a g e
Work Plan
2026
Goals should be consistent with the City’s goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe  Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home  Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community  Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community
Staffing Department: Community Development

GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING

MILESTONES STATUS

1. Regular Duties as identified
in LMMC 2.60.060 and

24.02.010
As needed 2025 Accomplishment:

Reviewed and
considered 21
discretionary projects
including, but not limited
to Site Development
Plans, Variances,
Special Permits,
Conditional Use Permits,
Annexations, Zone
Change, and General
Plan Amendment.
2026: Continue to review
and consider plans,
applications, maintain
the zone map, and
interpret, administer and
enforce the Zoning
Code.

Ongoing

2. In performing all actions and
duties, seek and promote
support of the City’s Climate
Action Plan (CAP) including
assisting in the 2026/2027
implementation and
monitoring work plan.

As needed Appointed
commissioners to aid for
development of EV
requirements to aid with
the implementation of
the CAP.

Ongoing

3. Review and comment on
proposed Zoning Ordinance
Amendments, including
As needed 2025 Accomplishment:

Reviewed and provided
direction on the
Ongoing

PLANNING COMMISSION
2 | P a g e

GOALS DUE DATE TRACKING

MILESTONES STATUS
Clean-Up Amendments and
Specific Plans updates.

Objective Design
Standards
2026: Review and
provide input on Housing
Element Implementation
Programs

4. Downtown Village Specific
Plan Update. Review and
provide comment as
presented and provide
recommendations to staff
and/or Council as needed.
2026 2025 Accomplishment:

Reviewed DVSP Update
materials and provided
direction.
2026: Review and
provide comment on the
DVSP Administrative
Draft
In Process

5. Assist the City in advancing
goals with focus on economic
development and housing
with with consideration of
alignment with the City’s
Strategic Plan and fiscal
sustainability.
2026 2025 Accomplishment:

Held a Sidewalk Dining
Workshop
2026: Hold a Planning
Commission Workshop
To be scheduled in
the Spring/Summer
of 2026

6.

PLANNING COMMISSION
3 | P a g e
The Planning Commission shall have, and is hereby vested with all the powers and duties provided by said act and amendments thereto, and such other powers and duties as may be conferred upon the Planning Commission by any and all laws of the State of California and the City Council.

2.60.140 - La Mesa relocation appeals board.

The planning commission shall also act as the "La Mesa relocation appeals board" and shall have the power when it acts in that capacity as provided by the by-laws for the relocation appeals board and shall carry out its duties and obligations pursuant to said by-laws. Said by-laws shall be adopted at the first meeting of the planning commission acting as the relocation appeals board and shall not thereafter be amended without the prior approval of the city council.

LMMC Title 24 – Zoning Ordinance

24.02.010 - Administration and enforcement agencies
B. Planning Agency. The city council, planning commission and community development department are hereby designated collectively as the planning agency. The planning agency shall perform all functions required by California state law. The specific duties and functions of the council, commission, and departments relative to this title are given below.

1. Perform all functions required by California law of a planning agency.

2. Furnish information and general assistance to the public in the administration of this title.

3. Maintain the Zone Map.

4. Review site development plans as to their compliance with the requirements of this title.

5. Review applications for adjustments in development regulations.

6. Interpret, administer and enforce this title.

7. Assist the planning commission in performance of its functions.

E. Planning Commission. The authority and functions of the planning commission in the administration of this title shall be to:

1. Review and approve plans, including site development plans when either required of or when appealed or referred to the commission, and to perform such other functions as provided by this title.

2. Resolve the question as to whether or not a proposed use is permitted in one or more zones in keeping with the general description and intent of such zones and the Land Use Element of the General Plan.

3. Consider appeals from any determination made in the administration or enforcement of this title.

4. Review applications for special permits, conditional use permits and variances.

5. Perform other functions as provided by state law.

6. Resolve questions or alleged ambiguity on appeal from the determination of the Community Development Department.

DATE: February 24, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Shannon Esenwein, Director of Finance
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: BUDGET MONITORING QUARTERLY REPORT (OCTOBER 2025- DECEMBER 2025)
Please see the attached Budget Monitoring Report.

2025-2026 Budget Monitoring Report
Quarter Ending December 31, 2025

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 1
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
The Finance Department produces the quarterly Budget Monitoring Report using month end financial information from the City’s financial system, input from staff in City departments, and relevant information from local, regional, and national sources (e.g., newspapers, economists, League of California Cities, etc.).

If new to municipal budgets, it’s suggested to start by first reviewing the Reader’s Guide located at the end of the document for information on the organization and layout of the report.

Table of Contents
Page
Executive Summary................................................................................................... 2 Resources .................................................................................................................. 6 Appropriations........................................................................................................... 7 Reserves..................................................................................................................... 9 Reader’s Guide .......................................................................................................... 10

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 2
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The second quarter of Fiscal Year 2025–2026 reflects a period of steady financial performance for the City of La Mesa. National economic indicators point to a gradual cooling of economic activity, while local conditions remain stable. Within the City’s General Fund, revenues are tracking close to expectations, expenditures remain manageable, and reserve levels continue to exceed policy targets.

This report provides a high level overview of the City’s financial position. It includes narrative explanations of economic trends, descriptions of revenue and expenditure activity, and context for how these factors influence the City’s fiscal outlook. The goal is to help residents, community partners, and stakeholders understand how the City is managing public resources and preparing for future economic conditions.

NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECASTS
U.S. Leading Economic Index
The U.S. Leading Economic Index (LEI), a widely used measure of future economic conditions, continued its downward trend in late 2025. The index fell 0.3% in November to 97.9, marking the latest in a series of small monthly declines. Over the six month period ending in November, the index decreased 1.2%, a slower rate of decline than the previous six months.

The LEI’s movement reflects several underlying dynamics:
• Weak consumer expectations continued to be the largest drag on the index. • New orders in manufacturing and other sectors also contributed to the decline. • Labor market indicators, such as initial unemployment claims and manufacturing hours, provided modest positive support.

Despite strong real GDP growth of 4.4% in the third quarter of 2025, the LEI suggests that national economic activity may slow in 2026. This type of movement, strong current performance paired with weakening forward indicators, is typical during periods of economic transition.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 3
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
Consumer Price Index
Inflation remains moderate but persistent. The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI U) increased 0.3% in December and 2.7% over the past 12 months.

Key drivers include:
• Shelter costs, which rose 0.4% in December and continue to be the largest contributor to monthly inflation.
• Food prices, both at home and away from home, which increased 0.7% for the month. • Energy prices, which rose 0.3%.

Core inflation (excluding food and energy) increased 0.2% in December. Several categories, including recreation, airline fares, medical care, apparel, personal care, and education, experienced price increases, while communication, used vehicles, and household furnishings saw declines.

Overall, inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long term target but has stabilized compared to the more volatile periods of recent years.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 4
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025

LOCAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECASTS
Unemployment Rate
Local labor market conditions remain steady. National unemployment held at 4.4% in December, while California’s unemployment rate remained within a narrow 5.4%–5.6% range throughout 2025.

This stability reflects several trends:
• Employment continues to trend up in food services and drinking places, health care, and social assistance.
• Slower job switching, as workers remain in positions longer. • Longer job searches, particularly among individuals reentering the labor force. • Stable job losses, indicating that employers are not reducing staff at elevated rates.

San Diego County and the City of La Mesa continue to mirror these statewide patterns. While unemployment remains slightly elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, the labor market shows no signs of broad deterioration.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 5
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
Local Sales Tax Allocation
Sales tax performance across California showed modest improvement in 2025. Statewide, local one cent sales and use tax receipts increased 1.9% for the July–September period. La Mesa outperformed the statewide trend, with receipts rising 8.0% compared to the same quarter in 2024.

After adjusting for reporting anomalies, underlying taxable sales increased 0.8%. Sector specific performance varied:
• Autos & Transportation: New car dealers saw modest gains as consumers accelerated purchases ahead of tariff changes.
• State–County Pools: Strong performance with an 8.8% return, benefiting La Mesa as one of its major revenue categories.
• General Consumer Goods: Declines in apparel and electronics reflected more cautious household spending.
• Food & Drugs: Cannabis retailers experienced reduced revenue due to market saturation and falling commodity prices.
• Building & Construction: Activity slowed as contractors faced higher material costs following tariff increases.

Measure L revenues increased 2.1%, driven primarily by general consumer goods. Countywide taxable sales grew 3.1%, and the Southern California region increased 1.8%.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 6
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025

GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
General Fund Resources
As of the second quarter of FY26, revenues remain consistent with projections and align with prior year performance. It is normal for revenue to lag behind during the first half of the year because the largest income source, property tax, is predominantly collected in the latter half of the fiscal year. In addition, sales tax payments (including base sales and use tax and Proposition L transaction tax) are subject to a standard two-month processing delay by the State before being remitted to the City. Overall, General Fund revenue is strong, exceeding the prior fiscal year by almost $4 million and achieving 35.5% of the total budgeted revenue to date.

Detailed Revenue Highlights
• Property Tax - The City collected $4.94 million through the second quarter, representing

23.9% of the budget. Property tax revenue is historically concentrated in the second half of the fiscal year, so early year collections are typically low. Current receipts are $265,636 higher than the same period last year.
• Sales Tax, Proposition L, and Cannabis – These three revenue sources appear higher than last year due to an unprocessed accounting adjustment. After adjusting for timing, sales

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 7
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
tax and cannabis business tax revenues are trending slightly above prior year levels, while Proposition L is slightly lower.
• Licenses and Permits - Revenue increased by $540,898 compared to last year. Several major development projects, including the Jericho Road (73 units) and Spring Street (147 units) housing developments, contributed to higher plan check fees. While the final 17 single family dwelling in the Summit Estates has increased permit fee revenue. Fee adjustments implemented in April 2025 also supported revenue growth in this category. • Revenue from Other Agencies - Lower than last year due to a temporary delay in Heartland JPA reimbursement processing.
• Use of Money and Property – Trending at last year’s levels and will increase when all accounting entries are posted to the financial system. The Finance Department continues to monitor revenue in this category.

General Fund Appropriations
With 50% of the fiscal year completed, overall General Fund expenditures total 50.6% of the approved budget. The level of spending is slightly higher than at the same point in the prior year and reflects a more constrained budget environment in the current fiscal year.

Departmental Expenditure Overview
• Fire – Overall expenditures are at 52.6% while fire overtime expenditures are at 84.6% of the approved budget. Spending is modestly above the midyear mark, expenditure patterns in this area are consistent with the same period in the prior fiscal year and remain within expected ranges.
• Administrative Services - Includes several departments such as the city council, city treasurer, city attorney, city manager, city clerk, human resources, finance, communication manager, information technology and non-departmental. Combined expenditures are at 61% of the approved budget. The main area exceeding the midyear benchmark is NonPage 33 of 151 CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 8
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
Departmental, which reflect the budgeted contingency amount of ($2,187,800). This contingency represents anticipated savings intended to offset appropriations in the general fund as a whole.
• Community Development - Expenditures are at 53.7% midway through the year with $673,035 or 15.31% encumbered for professional and specialized services. Salary and benefit expenses are at 46.01% versus 31.89% in the previous year and material and supplies are at 69.15% versus 49.95% in the previous year.

Salaries and wages and materials and supplies total 51.43% and 55.82% respectively for all General Fund expenditures. This is mainly due to a tightening of the budget for salaries and wages and the budgeted contingency amount in materials, supplies and services.

Year-to-date expenditures include all payments made to vendors and all purchase commitments recorded in the financial system as of the report date. Some expenses, such as credit card transactions are recorded one to two months after purchases are made due to processing timelines. In addition, certain accounting entries may still be in progress. As a result, reported figures may change as additional transactions are finalized.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 9
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
The Finance Department in coordination with the City Manager’s Office will continue to closely monitor spending throughout the fiscal year to ensure expenditures remain within the limits approved by the City Council.

Overall, spending at the midpoint of the fiscal year is generally aligned with budget expectations.

While certain areas require continued attention, expenditures remain manageable, and staff will continue proactive oversight to maintain fiscal stability through yearend.

General Fund Reserves
Estimated available reserves for FY 25–26 total $58.55 million. Final reserve levels will be confirmed following completion of the FY 24–25 audit.

The City continues to exceed both reserve policy targets:
• 15% Rainy Day Reserve
• 25% Cash Flow Reserve
Strong reserves provide financial stability, support essential services, and help the City navigate economic uncertainty. General Fund reserves are projected to meet both the Rainy Day Reserve target and the additional Cash Flow Reserve target in FY 25-26.

CONCLUSIONS
The City of La Mesa remains in a stable financial position as it enters the second half of FY 25-

26. Revenues are performing as expected, expenditures remain manageable, and reserves continue to exceed policy thresholds. While national indicators point to slower economic growth in 2026, the City’s conservative budgeting practices and ongoing monitoring efforts position La Mesa well for the months ahead.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 10
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
READER’S GUIDE
Managing a municipality the size of La Mesa is, in many ways, like managing a for profit corporation. Instead of focusing upon bottom-line profits, La Mesa managers must skillfully steward public dollars and ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the City’s operations. City Staff must operate within legislatively approved budgets that are reviewed by residents, business leaders, and others interested in the City.

Like private corporations, public entities report their financial condition on a regular basis.

Corporations make reports to stockholders while public entities report to their “stakeholders” -- the individuals and organizations that have a “stake” in the entity’s operations.

In addition to an annual financial report and biennial budget document, the City of La Mesa publishes a quarterly Budget Monitoring Report to provide stakeholders with current information about the City’s financial condition and performance in the essential areas of the City’s operations.

This report is designed to give the reader a sense of how well La Mesa is doing fiscally and what its current successes or challenges might be. It includes a high-level overview of the City’s financial condition followed by more detailed information on resources and expenditures for those readers who are interested in going beyond the bottom line.

This Reader’s Guide has been developed to assist readers in reviewing the City of La Mesa’s quarterly Budget Monitoring Report. It highlights the type of information contained in each section and presents a glossary of commonly used budget terms.

Please contact Shannon Esenwein at (619) 667-1122 with any questions, comments, or suggestions.

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 11
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025

QUARTERLY BUDGET MONITORING REPORT ORGANIZATION
Executive Summary – A broad level overview of the City of La Mesa’s current financial condition.

Resources – A more detailed discussion of revenue collections and other resources supporting the City’s expenditures. Included in the discussion is a financial table showing the current year’s budget, year-to-date collections, and calculated percent of budget collected. The discussion also includes comments on the significant factors and conditions affecting these items.

Appropriations – A more detailed discussion of expenditures and reserves. Included in the discussion is a financial table showing the current year’s budget by department classification, year-to-date expenditures, and calculated percent of budget expended. The discussion also includes comments on the significant factors and conditions affecting these items.

Reserves - Commentary on estimated ending fund balance and its relationship to reserve targets.

Included is a table displaying historical ending fund balance related to reserve targets.

FUNDS NOT REPORTED ON
This report focuses on the General Fund which provides many government services. Other funds have been excluded from this report.

GLOSSARY
The following are definitions of some of the more common terms one may encounter in reviewing this document.

Accrual Basis – The basis of accounting under which revenues are recorded when earned, and expenditures are recorded when incurred, regardless of when cash actually changes hands.

Accrued Revenue – Revenue earned during the current accounting period, but which is not collected until a subsequent accounting period.

Appropriation – Amount authorized for expenditure by the City Council.

Beginning Fund Balance – An account used to record resources available for expenditure in one fiscal year because of revenues collected more than the budget and/or expenditures less than the budget in the prior fiscal year.

Budget - A defined-period financial plan detailing anticipated income and expenses. After City Council approval, these figures act as maximum spending authority for the City.

Ending Fund Balance - An account used to record resources available at year end as a result of revenues collected in excess of the budget and/or expenditures less than the budget during the fiscal year. The City’s operating reserves are budgeted in the General Fund ending fund balance.

Expenditure – The payment for City obligations, goods, and services.

Fiscal Year (FY) – A twelve-month period designated as the operating year for accounting and

CITY OF LA MESA PAGE 12
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT QUARTER ENDING DEC. 31, 2025
budgeting purposes. The City of La Mesa’s fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.

Fund - Governmental accounting systems are organized and operated on a fund basis. A fund is an independent financial and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts in which financial transactions relating to revenues, expenditures, assets, and liabilities are recorded.

Funds are established to account for the use of restricted revenue sources and, normally, to carry on specific activities or pursue specific objectives.

General Fund – The financial and accounting entity that comprises typical operations of a municipality such as police, fire, public works, and other departments.

Grants – A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function.

Grants may be classified as either operational or capital, depending upon the grantor.

M&O (Maintenance and Operating) Costs – Expenditure category that represents amounts paid for supplies and other services and charges.

Proposition L – Initially passed by voters on November 4, 2008, the La Mesa Vital City Services Measure established a ¾ cent local transactions and use tax (commonly referred to as a sales tax) that took effect on April 1, 2009. On November 5, 2024, residents overwhelmingly reaffirmed this support, with 81.37% of the voters approving Measure L to extend the tax for another 20 years.

Reserve – An account used either to set aside budgeted revenues that are not required for expenditure in the current budget or to earmark revenues for a specific future purpose.

Resources - Total dollars available for appropriation, including estimated revenues, interfund transfers, and beginning fund balances.

Revenue - Sources of income received during the fiscal year, operating transfers from other funds, and other financing sources such as the proceeds derived from the sale of fixed assets.

Revenues from Other Agencies – Funds received from federal, state, and other local government sources in the form of grants, shared revenues, and payments in lieu of taxes.

Taxes – Compulsory charges levied by a government for financing services performed for the common benefit of the people. This term does not include specific charges made against persons or property for current or permanent benefit, such as special assessments.

Trust Funds – Funds used to account for assets held by a government in a trustee capacity for individuals, private organizations, other governments, and/or other funds. Examples are pension trust funds, nonexpendable trust funds, and expendable trust funds.

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 24, 2026
SUBJECT: ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORTING

AND APPROVAL OF CONTINUED USE PER LA MESA
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-2896 (LA MESA POLICE
DEPARTMENT’S MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
– ASSEMBLY BILL 481)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Police Department
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council accept the annual report and adopt the Resolution approving the Police Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy and the continued use of Military Equipment by the La Mesa Police Department based on the findings, as required by law?
Recommendation:

Review and accept the annual report and adopt the Resolution approving the policy and the continued use of Military Equipment by the La Mesa Police Department based on the findings as required by law.

Fiscal Impact:

There would not be any new direct fiscal impacts to continuing the use of equipment already in the Policy Department’s inventory. Maintenance costs of existing equipment are within the Department’s budget.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 2 of 4
BACKGROUND:

Effective January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 481 (codified in Government Code section 7070, et seq.) requires legislative bodies to adopt ordinances approving military equipment use policies before law enforcement agencies can continue to engage in specified activities related to the use of what the state legislature has now defined as “military equipment” in Government Code section 7070.

The La Mesa Police Department has several pieces qualifying as “military equipment” in inventory and engages in critical public safety activities.

On May 10, 2022, the La Mesa City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022-2896, approving a Military Equipment Use Policy.

On April 25, 2023, the La Mesa City Council renewed Ordinance No. 2022-2896.

On February 27, 2024, the La Mesa City Council renewed Ordinance No. 2022-2896.

On February 25, 2025, the La Mesa City Council renewed Ordinance No. 2022-2896.

The Military Equipment Use Police Annual Report was made public on January 21, 2026, at the Community Police Oversight Board meeting and has been posted on the Police Department’s website at least 30 days prior to this Council meeting.

DISCUSSION:

The Police Department is responsible for ensuring that all provisions of Government Code sections 7071 and 7072 are met. The City Council is required by law to review the ordinance and policy at least annually and have the opportunity to renew it or make any necessary changes.

The annual policy approves the continued use of equipment currently in the Police Department’s inventory by authorized and trained personnel when the use is necessary to maintain public safety.

The policy approval would also allow the continued use of military equipment when necessary. In certain circumstances, there arises a need to deploy military equipment from, or lend military equipment to, outside entities to promote the safety and security of community members.

A full inventory of the Police Department’s military equipment is contained in the Annual Report, which is attached. Government Code §7071(d)(1) sets forth the findings that City

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 3 of 4
Council must make in order to annually approve the policy and ordinance. The City Council can make the required findings because:

1. Authorizing the use of military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

The use of this equipment is part of the La Mesa Police Department’s overall approach to Critical Incident Management, Use of Force, De-Escalation and public safety. The equipment will enable department members to properly respond to both planned and unplanned events efficiently and effectively.

2. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties by ensuring required reporting out, the opportunity for community engagement and feedback, and transparency and oversight regarding the acquisition and use of the specified military equipment in the City of La Mesa.

3. For the proposed equipment purchases, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. Prior military equipment use has complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 4 of 4
CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the Council adopt the following actions:

1. Review and accept the Military Equipment Use Policy Annual Report, attached.

2. By Resolution, re-approve the Military Equipment Use Policy (Ordinance No. 2022-2896) and the continued use of Military Equipment by the La Mesa Police Department based on the findings, as required by law.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Ray Sweeney
City Manager Chief of Police
Attachments:

A. Draft Resolution
B. Military Equipment Use Policy Annual Report and Inventory C. Ordinance No. 2022-2896
D. Military Equipment Use Policy 706

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING A MILITARY USE POLICY AND CONTINUED USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT FOR POLICE SERVICES PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7071 et seq.)
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, the City Council of the City of La Mesa accepted the La Mesa Police Department’s annual report on its use of “military equipment” and approves the “military equipment use policy” by means of a resolution in compliance with Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”) (Government Code sections 7071 et. seq.);
WHEREAS, La Mesa Police Policy 706 sets forth a military equipment use policy that is consistent with the Police Department's current practices, has been posted on the Department's website for at least thirty (30) days, complies with all the requirements of AB 481, will ensure ongoing regulation and compliance with the law going forward and will provide a means of community engagement and transparency regarding use of military equipment by the Department;
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Police Department held a public meeting on the annual report of its use of “military equipment” during the La Mesa Community Police Oversight Board meeting on January 21, 2026, where the La Mesa Police Department received public comment on its use of “military equipment” during the preceding year;
WHEREAS, authorizing the use of military equipment as set forth in La Mesa Police Department Policy 706 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. The acquisition and use of the military equipment as set forth in La Mesa Police Department Policy 706 is part of the Police Department's overall approach to Critical Incident Management, Use of Force, De-escalation, and public safety. The equipment will enable department members to properly respond to both planned and unplanned events efficiently and effectively;
WHEREAS, La Mesa Police Department Policy 706 will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties by ensuring required reporting out, the opportunity for community engagement and feedback, and transparency and oversight regarding the acquisition and use of the specified military equipment in the City of La Mesa; and WHEREAS, prior military equipment use by the La Mesa Police Department complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time of the use.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa that:

1. That the City Council of the City of La Mesa hereby adopts and approves the findings set forth above in support of this Resolution.

2. That the City Council of the City of La Mesa hereby approves La Mesa Police Department Policy 706 and annual report attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held on the 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026-__ , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Annual AB 481 Equipment
Report
LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 1
Executive Summary
AB 481, approved by the Governor on September 30, 2021, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body by adoption of a military equipment use policy. The La Mesa Police Department is required to seek City Council approval of its military equipment use by ordinance at a regular open meeting prior to taking certain actions related to the finding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined in Government Code 7070(c).

The bill allows the City Council to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines the military equipment meets specified standards. La Mesa Ordinance 2022-2896 was passed and adopted by the La Mesa City Council on April 26, 2022. This ordinance is subject to annual City Council review to determine whether, based on an annual military equipment report, the standards set forth in that ordinance have been met. The City Council may renew the authorizing ordinance, disapprove authorization for particular military equipment where standards have not been met, or require modifications to the military equipment use procedure to address any noncompliance with standards.

The bill also requires publication of the military equipment use policy and the annual military equipment report on the Department’s website.

Section 7072 of the Government Code states:
(a) A law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment use policy pursuant to Section 7071 shall submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.
(4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
(5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment. (b) Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report pursuant to this section, the law enforcement agency shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 2
Introduction
The La Mesa Police Department retains and employs a variety of equipment to assist in safely achieving the furtherance of its mission to “protecting life and property while promoting community involvement through professional service, honor, trust and integrity.” While the inventory of equipment is varied, the mere possession of the equipment does not warrant its use during every incident.

The La Mesa Police Department recognizes that critical incidents are unpredictable and can be dynamic in nature. A variety of equipment options can greatly assist trained officers and supervisors in bringing those incidents to a swift and safe resolution. The use of this equipment is restricted by Department policy for use only in certain instances and in some cases only by certain units and highly trained personnel.

While the Department’s equipment procedure is wide-ranging, it is not all inclusive. There may be circumstances where unpredictable incidents demand the need for incident commanders to authorize the use of equipment in a manner not outlined within Department procedures. In evaluating those instances, the judgement of the incident commander in considering the totality of the circumstances, public safety, officer safety, civil rights, and information known to the incident commander at the time will be used.

It is incumbent upon incident commanders, supervisors, individual officers, and specific units to recognize the particular circumstances in which equipment should be employed to enhance public safety and the safety or officers, in order to bring critical incidents to a safe resolution.

Definitions
The La Mesa Police Department recognizes that differing terms, descriptions, or terminology is often applied to military equipment. Therefore, in the interest of transparency and clarity, this report will utilize definitions enumerated in Government Code 7070, which states:
(a) “Governing body” means the elected body that oversees a law enforcement agency or, if there is no elected body that directly oversees the law enforcement agency, the appointed body that oversees a law enforcement agency. In the case of a law enforcement agency of a county, including a sheriff’s department or a district attorney’s office, “governing body” means the board of supervisors of the county.
(c) “Military equipment” means the following:
(1) Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. (2) Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.

However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
(3) High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 3
(4) Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion. (5) Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. (6) Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. (7) Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature.

However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision. (8) Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
(9) Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.
(10) Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency. (11) Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. (12) “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray. (13) Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
(14) The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, “bean bag,” rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
(15) Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
(16) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), “military equipment” does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.
(d) “Military equipment use policy” means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by a law enforcement agency or a state agency that addresses, at a minimum, all of the following:
(1) A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 4
(2) The purposes and authorized uses for which the law enforcement agency or the state agency proposes to use each type of military equipment. (3) The fiscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment. (4) The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use. (5) The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any officer, agent, or employee of the law enforcement agency or the state agency is allowed to use each specific type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy. (6) The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy. (7) For a law enforcement agency, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the law enforcement agency will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.

Government Code 7072(a)(1) Equipment Use Summary 2025

TRAINING EVENT USAGE
Expendables are recorded based on the number of rounds utilized during training events. Multi-use items and platforms are recorded based on the number of training events conducted during the year.

During each training event, multiple users may receive training on each piece of equipment. In 2025, the La Mesa Police Department utilized the following equipment during training events:

Equipment Used Category Total Quantity Used
Lenco BearCat 3 3 training events
DJI Avanta 2 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) 1 5 training events Skydio x-10 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) 1 5 training events PepperBall 2% PAVA Rounds 12 10 rounds
40MM Launcher 14 12 training events
Bean Bag shotgun 14 12 training events
CTS 2581 Super Sock cartridge (bean bag) 14 313 rounds
Speer LE Gold Dot Ammo, .223 (from M4) 10 4685 rounds
Federal Ammo, 147 grain .40 10 300 rounds
Hornady ELD Match Tap Precision Ammo, .308 10 186 rounds

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 5
Daniel Defense M4 Rifle 10 60 training events
Remington .308 700 Rifle 10 5 training events
PepperBall (inert rounds) 12 2,261 rounds
PepperBall SA Launcher 12 12 training events
4557 40MM Foam Baton 14 353 rounds
Colt M4 Rifle 10 9 training events
CTS 7290 Flash Bang 12 2 rounds

FIELD INCIDENT USAGE
Although deployed and available for use during an incident, not all pieces of equipment are utilized during an incident. For example, officers may carry a bean bag shotgun with them during an incident, but do not fire any Super Sock cartridges during that incident, and thus the cartridges are not included on the table below. Accordingly, the following information differentiates between equipment deployed and equipment discharged.

In 2025, the La Mesa Police Department utilized AB 481 equipment during the following field incidents:

Date Equipment Used Category # Used Description
January 17 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a vandalism suspect.

January 18 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for theft suspects.

January 18
UAS Skydio X-10
1 1 deployed Video of a death scene.

UAS Autel 1 deployed
February 9
UAS Autel 1 1 deployed Armed barricaded suspect wanted for false imprisonment. Lenco BearCat 3 1 deployed
February 21 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for an attempted vehicle theft suspect.

February 21 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a vehicle theft suspect.

March 6 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a robbery suspect.

March 20 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for an encampment.

May 23
UAS DJI Avanta 2 1 1 deployed Armed barricaded suspect wanted for the discharge of a firearm. Lenco BearCat 3 1 deployed
June 21 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Barricaded Assault with a Deadly Weapon suspect.

July 5 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Suspicious death scene photographs.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 6

FIELD INCIDENT USAGE CONTINUED
Date Equipment Used Category # Used Description
July 8 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a stolen vehicle.

July 13
Lenco BearCat 3 1 deployed Armed barricaded Assault with a MCV Deadly Weapon suspect. 5 1 deployed
September 4 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Perimeter for 4th Waiver search.

September 9 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a discarded firearm.

September 18 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a vehicle used in an attempted felony crime.

September 18 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search the location for a possible fire.

September 26 UAS Skydio X-1o 1 1 deployed Search for a felony warrant suspect.

September 26 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a felony suspect.

September 30 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Overview of a property for warrant planning
October 9
UAS Skydio X-10 1 2 deployed
Arrest of a barricaded felony suspect
who threatened to shoot officers.

Lenco BearCat 3 1 deployed
MCV 3 1 deployed
40 mm Launcher 14 1 round
4557 40 mm Foam Baton 14 1 round
October 12 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a theft suspect.

October 15 UAS Skydio X-10 11 1 deployed Search for a felony suspect.

October 21
Pepperball Launcher 12 1 deployed
Barricaded felony suspect in a vehicle.

Pepperball (2% Pava Rounds) 12 10 Rounds
October 29 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a theft suspect.

November 8 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Arrest of barricaded felony suspect.

UAS DJI Avanta 2 Threatened to shoot officers. 1 1 deployed

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 7
Pepperball Launcher 12 1 deployed
Pepperball (2% Pava Rounds) 14 7 rounds
40 mm Launcher 14 1 deployed
4557 40 mm Foam Baton 14 7 rounds
November 12 Lenco BearCat 3 1 deployed Responded to a shooting at a residence
November 23 UAS Skydio X-10 1 1 deployed Search for a theft suspect.

December 6 UAS DJI Avanta 2
Lenco BearCat
1 1 deployed Barricaded felony suspect. Threatened
to shoot officers 3 1 deployed
Complaints Summary Regarding Equipment Usage Per Government Code 7072(a)(2)
In some instances, the application and use of equipment specified in Government Code 7070 may cause questions and/or concerns for members of the community. The Department recognizes this, and it is vital that such concerns are addressed, and questions are answered.

The La Mesa Police Department is committed to full and fair investigations into citizen complaints.

Existing procedures ensure that complaints are resolved in a fair, impartial, and expeditious manner to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the Department. The professional working relationship with the La Mesa Citizens’ Police Oversight Board and the Independent Police Auditor further underscores the Department’s commitment to transparency in resolving complaints, advancing and improving training, and ensuring public trust.

During the 2025 calendar, the La Mesa Police Department received zero (0) complaints/concerns regarding the use of any equipment.

Summary and Responses to Equipment Procedure Violations Per Government Code 7072(a)(3)
Methods for discovering any violations of the La Mesa Police Department’s AB 481 Equipment Policy/Procedure include citizen complaints/reports, reports received via the Citizens’ Police Oversight Board online reporting portal, the Department’s online complaint portal, supervisory review of Body Worn Cameras, and direct observation by supervisory personnel and/or training staff.

No violations of the La Mesa Police Department’s AB 481 Equipment policy/procedure were observed, discovered, or reported during 2025.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 8
AB 481 Equipment Inventory and Costs Per Government Code 7072(a)(4) & 7072(a)(5)
The La Mesa Police Department’s AB 481 Equipment Inventory is included in Appendix A in this report.

The Inventory consists of fiscal information, including the cost of each item, expected lifespan, and annual cost. In 2025, the department purchased 2 DJI Avata UAS devices and 18 Penn Arms single-shot 40mm launchers, which were requested and approved in the 2024 report.

Projected AB 481 Equipment Acquisitions FY 26/27 Per Government Code 7072(a)(6)

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS (CTS) OC AEROSOL DEFENSE FOGGER The Department is requesting approval to purchase 100 Combined Tactical Systems (CTS) level 3 OC Aerosol Defense Fogger (model 1337).

Combined Tactical System (CTS)
Description The fogger deploys Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) as an aerosol fog for small or confined spaces.

Quantity 100
Capability Effective deployment method for small spaces where the suspect is alone but cannot be targeted by an OC stream.

Life Span 5 years
Manufacture’s
Description
These units are used to apply controlling force in pre-entry situations and for area denial in rooms, including hallways, tunnels, and basements.

Purpose Allows for effective OC deployment in small or confined spaces where the suspect is alone.

Authorized
Use/ Training
Required
Only authorized SRT operators who have been fully trained.

Costs Unit Cost: $ 18. Total Cost: $1800
Maintenance Costs: None
Year Obtained: Request to purchase in 2026
How to purchase: Department Budget
The Department seeks to add the Combined Tactical Systems (CTS) level 3 OC Aerosol Defense Fogger (model 1337). The fogger deploys Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) as an aerosol fog, making it an effective deployment method for small spaces where a suspect is alone but cannot be targeted by traditional OC delivery. Potential scenarios would include suspects barricaded in vehicles or small rooms. The availability of this device would increase officer safety by reducing the need for officers to enter enclosed spaces where suspects are hiding. Because this is an aerosol device, there are no sparks, heat, or threat of accidental fire damage to people or property.

La Mesa Police Department Annual AB 481 Equipment Report 2025 PAGE 9

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS (CTS) LAUNCHING CUP
The Department is requesting approval to purchase a launching cup device attached to the barrel of a shotgun that can deploy chemical agents.

Combined Tactical Systems (CTS) Launching Cup
Description The launching cup is a device attached to the barrel of a shotgun that can deploy chemical agents.

Quantity 2
Capability This device allows SRT operators to deploy chemical agents from a shotgun platform instead of deploying them by hand or a gas ram. Also allows deployment at the upper levels of structures.

Life Span 5 years
Manufacture’s
Description
The Launching Cups can be attached to virtually any 12-gauge shotgun. These can be fired from most 12-gauge smooth-bore shotguns.

Purpose To allow operators to remain behind positions of cover and concealment and deploy chemical agents.

Authorized
Use/ Training
Required
Only specially trained La Mesa Police Special Response Team operators will be authorized to use this equipment.

Costs Unit Cost: $355. Total Cost: $710
Maintenance Costs: None.

Year Obtained: Request to purchase in 2026
How to purchase: Department budget
The Special Response Team does not have a method of deploying large chemical agent canisters from a distance. In these scenarios, officers must approach a suspect’s barricaded position, which poses a significant threat to officer safety. The launcher allows officers to remain behind cover and concealed positions to deploy the munitions. It can also be used to deploy munitions to upper-level structures.

Item Item Category Item Name Item Description Quantity Capabilities Purchase
Cost Purpose/Use Authorized Use/Training Required Expected Lifespan Annual Cost 1 Category 1 /
Unmanned Aircraft
System (UAS/Drone)
Skydio 2* Commercial-grade UAS
(Unmanned Aircraft System)
/ Drone. This is a battery
powered, remote operated
aircraft.
2 Capable of providing live and
recorded video images
captured from aerial positions.

Per unit
$1418.09
To be deployed when its view would assist
officers or incident commanders with tactical
or other public safety and life preservation
missions.

Only authorized operators that have been fully trained and acquire FAA certification are allowed to pilot this aircraft.
5-10 years $100-$500
2 Category 1 /
Unmanned Aircraft
System (UAS/Drone)
Skydio X10 Commercial-grade UAS
(Unmanned Aircraft System)
/ Drone. This is a battery
powered, remote operated
aircraft.
6 Capable of providing live and
recorded video images
captured from aerial positions.

Per unit
$25467.40
UASI Grant
funded
To be deployed when its view would assist
officers or incident commanders with tactical
or other public safety and life preservation
missions.

Only authorized operators that have been fully trained and acquire FAA certification are allowed to pilot this aircraft.
5-10 years ≤ $6000
3 Category 1 /
Unmanned Aircraft
System (UAS/Drone)
Autel* The EVO II is a commercialgrade UAV (Unmanned
Aerial Vehicle) / Drone. It is
a battery powered, remote
operated vehicle.
1 Capable of providing live and
recorded video images
captured from aerial positions.

Per unit
$9648.04
To be deployed when its view would assist
officers or incident commanders with tactical
or other public safety and life preservation
missions.

Only authorized operators that have been fully trained and acquire FAA certification are allowed to pilot this aircraft.
5-10 years $100-$500
4 Category 2/ Armored
Personnel Carrier
Lenco BearCat The Lenco BearCat is an
armored vehicle designed to
provide protection during
rescues and tactical events.
1 Capable of transporting
personnel and equipment
while providing them with
armored protection from
gunfire. It is designed to
withstand multiple bullet
strikes from small arms fire as
well as low level explosions.

UASI Grant
$297,367
To rescue police and civilian individuals from
dangerous scenes and move personnel and /or
resources in support of tactical operations in
which there is reason to expect potential
armed resistance requiring protection. Also to
enhance officer and community safety,
improve scene containment and stabilization,
and assist in resolving critical incidents.

Only La Mesa Police operators that have been trained in the operation of the BearCat are allowed to drive this vehicle.
20 Yrs. $1500-2000
5 Category 1/ Robot LT2-F Tactical Support
Robot
Tactical Robot/Unmanned,
remotely piloted, powered
ground vehicle.
1 This equipment is a battery
powered, remote operated
device. Equipped with two
cameras and two-way radio
capabilities.
$28,000 Increases safety to the community and officers
by allowing operators to remotely gain
visual/audio data, deliver crisis negotiations
phones, open doors, disrupt packages, and
clear buildings without putting an officer or
civilian in harm's way.

Only trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to use this robot. Appr. 15 years None 6 Category 1/ Robot Avatar Tactical Robot/Unmanned,
remotely piloted, powered
ground vehicle.
1 This equipment is a battery
powered, remote operated
device. Equipped with two
cameras and two-way radio
capabilities.
$14,350 Increases safety to the community and officers
by allowing operators to remotely gain
visual/audio data, deliver crisis negotiations
phones, open doors, disrupt packages, and
clear buildings without putting an officer or
civilian in harm's way.

Only trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to use this robot. Appr. 15 years There has been one repair which came
to $2000
7 Category 5/
Command and
Control Vehicles
Mobile Command
Vehicle (MCV)
2014 Dodge Ram 3500
ProMaster
1 The MCV is equipped with
communication and tactical
planning equipment and is
capable of being used as a
mobile operations command
and dispatch center. The
vehicle is also capable of
transporting personnel and
equipment to and from
incident scenes.
$100,000 This vehicle is used based on the specific
circumstances of a given critical incident, large
event, natural disaster or community event
that is taking place.

Only assigned personnel are allowed to drive and operate the Mobile Command Vehicle.
20 years ≤ $2500
La Mesa Police Department Military Equipment Inventory
* The Skydio 2 and Autel UAS will be phased out with the acquisition of the Skydio X10 Page 55 of 151

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
8 Category 7/ Breaching
Apparatus/ Slugs
Shotgun Breaching
Rounds / Royal Arms
and CTS 2570
Shotgun breaching rounds
are specialty shotgun shells
utilized for door breaching.
65 Designed to breach heavy
locks, dead-bolts, and hinges
mounted inside of solid oak or
steel doors.

Per unit
$4.14
To safely gain entry into a structure. Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to use the CTS 2570 round. Breaching tools that are explosive in nature can be deployed any time operators determine that it is tactically necessary to safely complete a lawful breaching, and then only when non-explosive breaching methods are not practical. Explosive breaching may only occur in the field or during training exercises after authorization by the Incident Commander or SRT Commander.

Until expended None
9 Category 12/
PepperBall Launcher
PepperBall/ Tac
700/Launchers
A system that uses high
pressure air to deliver
projectiles (similar to a paint
ball delivery system).
15 Launches less lethal munitions
up to 150 feet. Munitions open
upon impact and can disperse
oleoresin capsicum (OC)
powder or water that cause
irritation upon contact or
inhalation. Other munitions
are simply projectiles utilized
as a less lethal impact tool.

Per unit
$1100
The PepperBall Launcher is a less lethal use of
force option and limits the escalation of conflict
where employment of lethal force is prohibited
or undersirable.

Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on the use of the PepperBall Launcher are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
15 Years None
10 Category 12/
PepperBall Launcher
PepperBall Live
Projectile
The basic PepperBall
projectile with 2% pepper
powder
7762 Discharged from the
PepperBall launcher, the
projectile will break on impact
and release 2% PAVA pepper
powder. It is designed for
direct impact and area
saturation, especially in
confined, interior spaces. The
projectile has a velocity of 280-
350 FPS. The direct impact is
60ft and an area of saturation
of 150ft. It also contains 0.5%
PAVA Powder.8230.

Per 1500
rounds
$3420.00
The PepperBall Launcher is a less lethal use of
force option and limits the escalation of conflict
where employment of lethal force is prohibited
or undersirable.

Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on the use of the PepperBall Launcher are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
1 Year None
11 Category 12/
PepperBall Launcher
PepperBall Inert
Projectile
This is a PepperBall pratice
projectile.
6,425 Discharged from the
PepperBall launcher, the
projectile will break on impact,
and is designed for training
purposes, or when chemical
exposure is not desired or
required. Inside is a non toxic
white power.

Per 3000
rounds/
$1750
The PepperBall Launcher is a less lethal use of
force option and limits the escalation of conflict
where employment of lethal force is prohibited
or undersirable.

Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on the use of the PepperBall Launcher are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
1 Year None
12 Category
12/Flashbangs
CTS 7290 Flash Bang A Noise Flash Diversionary
Device (NFDD) is a device
that creates a bright flash
and loud sound to
temporarily divert the
attention of subjects in the
immediate area.
42 Capable of creating visual and
auditory distractions during
tactical operations which
allows for tactical advantage
during high-risk situations.

Per unit/
$48.00
NFDD's are used to distract and temporarily
disorient dangerous suspects by overwhelming
their senses of vision and hearing. The
distraction allows officers to seize a moment of
opportunity to safely resolve critical situations
during high-risk tactical operations.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are authorized to deploy flashbang devices.
5 Yrs. None

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
13 Category 12/Tear Gas OC-Oleoresin
Capsicum 5440
Flameless Explusion
Pyrotechnic grenade/nonlethal tool. 31 Pyrotechnic grenade that discharges a high volume of
OC through multiple emission
ports designed mostly for
indoor use, but can be
deployed outside. OC is an
inflammatory agent which
causes involuntary closure of
the eyes (open in 2-5 min) and
respiratory inflammation
(subsides in approximately 2
min.)
Per unit/
$36.73
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

N/A N/A
14 Category 12/Tear Gas 5230B CSChlorobenzylidenema
lononitrile
Pyrotechnic grenade/nonlethal tool.76 Pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a
maximum amount of irritant
smoke throughout multiple
rooms with minimal risk of
fire. CS is an irritating agent
and lachrymator (irritates the
eyes and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$36.74
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
15 Category 12/ Tear Gas 6230 CSChlorobenzylidenema
lononitrile
Pyrotechnic grenade/nonlethal tool.82 Pyrotechnic canister grenade emitting smoke through
multiple emission ports for 30
to 40 seconds. May be
launched or hand thrown. CS is
an irritating agent and
lachrymator (irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$26.50
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
16 Category 12/ Tear Gas 8230 CSChlorobenzylidenema
lononitrile
The smallest diameter
burning grenade/ non-lethal
tool.
87 Specifically for outdoor use.

Can be hand thrown or
launched. CS is an irritating
agent and lachrymator
(irritates the eyes and causes
tears to flow).

Per unit/
$21.38
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
17 Category 12/Tear Gas 2430 CTS 12 ga.
cartridge (shotgun)
CS
Chlorobenzylidenema
lononitrile
12 gauge Shotgun Cartridge/

1.5 grams CS Powder
164 Powder or liquid filled, nonburning, fin-stabilized rounds designed to penetrate light to
intermediate barriers such as
windows and hollow core
doors. The projectiles break
upon impact and deliver agent
payloads of powder or liquid
throughout the adjacent
target area. CS is an irritating
agent and lachrymator
(irritates the eyes and causes
tears to flow).

Per unit/
$9.00
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
18 Category 12/ Tear Gas 4431 CTS 40 mm CSChlorobenzylidenema lononitrile
40 MM projectile 6 grams CS
Powder Barricade
108 Kinetic Energy Munition used
as a less lethal use of force
option.

Per unit/
$29.00
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
19 Category 12/Tear Gas 5230 CTS CSChlorobenzylidenema lononitrile
Pyrotechnic grenade/nonlethal tool.11 The largest diameter burning grenade that discharges a high
volume of smoke and chemical
agent through multiple
emission ports. Specifically for
outdoor use. Can be hand
thrown or launched. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator (irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$35.00
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
20 Category 12/ Tear Gas 3230 CTS CSChlorobenzylidenema lononitrile
37MM CS Smoke Projectile/
non-lethal tool.
52 A short range CS cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator (irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$8.98
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
21 Category 12/ Tear Gas 3430 CS Muzzle Blast 37MM CS Smoke Projectile/ non-lethal tool.
30 A short range CS cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator (irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$8.98
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
22 Category 12/ Tear Gas 3440 OC Muzzle Blast 37MM OC Smoke Projectile/ non-lethal tool.
15 A short range OC cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. OC is an
inflammatory agent which
causes involuntary closure of
the eyes (open in 2-5 min) and
respiratory inflammation
(subsides in approximately 2
min.)
Per unit/
$8.98
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
23 Category 12/ Tear Gas 4630 CS Muzzle Blast 40MM CS Smoke Projectile/ non-lethal tool.
20 A short range CS cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator (irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Per unit/
$29.00
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None
24 Category 12/ Tear Gas 5099 MK-9 Magnum
Stream OC Aerosol
12 oz. Aerosol canister/ OC
Pepper Spray/ non-lethal
tool.
5 Aerosol that is equiped with a
trigger handle and will deliver
short burst of OC at an
effective range of 18-20 feet.

OC is an inflammatory agent
which causes involuntary
closure of the eyes (open in 2-
5 min) and respiratory
inflammation (subsides in
approximatley 2 min.)
Per unit/
$49.95
A non lethal use of force option used to limit
the escalation of conflict and safely resolve
critical situations.

Only specially trained La Mea Police operators who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
5 Yrs. None

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
25 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Speer LE Gold Dot
Ammunition
.223 Rem. 62 grain cartridge
for duty rifles and range
training
94,000
rounds
The Speer LE Gold Dot
cartridge is ammunition
deployed during potential
lethal encounters at long
distances. This 62 grain
projectile is designed to
maintain accuracy at long
distances. 12,000 rounds are
used for range qualificaitons
and training.

Per box of
500 rounds/
$303.00
Used wih all .223 cal. assualt rilfe precision
weapons to address a threat with more
precision and/ or greater distances than a
handgun, if present or feasible. It is only
deployed in situations where lethal force is
authorized.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators/police officers are authorized to use this ammunition. Required training includes: CA POST certified rifle course or CA POST certified SWAT training, and regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

Until expended None
26 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Colt M-4 Rifle This rifle is a firearm,
capable of accurately
stopping an armed subject
at various distances. The
Carbine rifle is a lightweight,
air-cooled, gas operated,
magazine fed, shoulder fired
weapon, designed for semiautomatic, selective fire (full auto).
14 The Colt M-4 is capable of
firing a 5.56mm projectile
bullet. Ammunition: Speer LE
Gold Dot .223 Rem. 62 grain
cartridge.

Per unit
$2,011.78
This rifle is only authorized for use by specially
trained La Mesa Police Special Response Team
operators in situations where lethal force is
authorized by law and department policy.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are authorized to use this rifle. Required training includes: CA POST certified rifle course, CA POST certified SWAT training, and regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

No expiration / rifle will
need to be replaced if/
when it becomes
unserviceable.

Varies/
maintenance
conducted by
departmental staff.
27 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Hornady .308 WIN.
168 Grain
ELD Match Tap Percision
cartridge ammunition
1640
rounds
The Hornady .308 168 grain,
ELD Match Tap Precision
cartridge is ammunition
deployed during potential
lethal encounters at long
distances. This 168 grain
projectile is designed to
maintain accuracy at long
distances.

Per 2000
rounds/
$1958.87
To be used wih the Remingtion .308 precision
weapon to address a threat with more
precision and/ or greater distances than a
handgun, if present or feasible. It is only
deployed in situations where lethal force is
authorized.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to operate with this ammuntion. Operators must successfully complete the CA Post certified Sniper Rifle Course as well as regular department presented training and qualifications as required by law and department policy.

Until expended None
28 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Daniel Defense M-4
Rifle
The carbine rifle is a
lightweight, air-cooled, gas
operated, magazine fed,
shoulder fired firearm,
designed for semiautomatic, selective fire (full
auto).
12 The Daniel Defense M-4 is
capable of firing a 5.56mm
projectile bullet. Ammunition:

Speer LE Gold Dot .223 Rem.
62 grain cartridge.

Per unit/
$2795.84
This rifle is only authorized for use by specially
trained La Mesa Police Special Response Team
operators in situations where lethal force is
authorized by law and department policy.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are authorized to use this rifle. Required training includes: CA POST certified rifle course, CA POST certified SWAT training, and regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

No expiration / rifle will
need to be replaced if
and when it becomes
unserviceable.

Varies; maintenance
is conducted by
department staff.
29 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Remington .308 Rifle/ The Remington .308 700
Bolt Action Rifle, 26" heavy
barrel with an aluminum
block bedded in its stock.

Manually operated bolt
action with 2 forward dualopposed lugs. The bolt face
is recessed, fully enclosing
the base of the cartridge.

The extractor is a C-clip
sitting within the bolt face.

The ejector is a plunger on
the bolt face actuated by a
coil spring. The bolt is a 3-
piece construction, brazed
together (Head, body and
bolt handle). The receiver is
milled from round cross
section steel.
4 The Remington 700 Bolt Action
rifle is capable of firing a .308
projectile bullet. The Hornady
.308 168 grain, ELD Match Tap
Precision
Per unit/
$800.00
To be used as a precision weapon to address a
threat with more precision and/ or greater
distances than a handgun, if present or
feasible. It is only deployed in situations where
lethal force is authorized.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to operate this weapon. Operators must successfully complete the CA Post certified Sniper Rifle Course as well as regular department presented training and qualifications as required by law and department policy.

Appr. 15 years N/A

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
30 Category 13/LRAD/
Mutual Aid
Long Range Acoustic
Device
The LRAD system is a type of
Acoustic Hailing Device
(AHD) used to send public
announcement messages
over long distances.
**This item is included in
the event that the La Mesa
Police Department borrows
and operates an LRAD
owned by another
agency.***
0 LRAD systems produce much
higher sound levels (volume)
than normal loudspeakers or
megaphones and can send
public announcement
messages clearly over long
distances.

N/A The device is used as a public announcement
system to deliver dispersal orders or other
instructions to unlawful assemblies or to
deliver critical emergency information (such as
evacuation instructions) to large crowds.

LRADs can only be deployed in accordance with all applicable laws and department policies governing use of force and first amendment events, and never as an acoustical weapon. While the La Mesa Police Department does not possess an LRAD, it is anticpated that one could be borrowed from another agency for use at an event in La Mesa. In such an event, only specially trained La Mesa Special Response Team operators would be authorized to deploy the LRAD.

N/A N/A
31 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Heckler and Koch
MP5 40 Cal.

This is a submachine gun
firearm, capable of
accurately stopping an
armed subject at various
distances. It is a
lightweight, magazine fed,
shoulder fired weapon,
designed for semiautomatic, selective fire (full
auto).
5 The Heckler and Koch MP5 is
capable of firing a 40 cal.
projectile bullet. Ammunition:

Speer LE Gold Dot .223 Rem.
62 grain cartridge.

Per unit/
$1700
This firearm is only authorized for use by
specially trained La Mesa Police Special
Response Team operators and officers in
situations where lethal force is authorized by
law and department policy.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators and officers are authorized to use this weapon. Required training includes: CA POST certified rifle course, and regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

No expiration / no longer
in production as of 2001
and will not be replaced
when it becomes
unserviceable.

None
32 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Heckler and Koch
MP5 9mm
This is a submachine gun
firearm, capable of
accurately stopping an
armed subject at various
distances. It is a
lightweight, magazine fed,
shoulder fired weapon,
designed for semiautomatic, selective fire (full
auto).
2 The Heckler and Koch MP5 is
capable of firing a 9mm
projectile bullet.

Per unit/
$1700
This firearm is only authorized for use by
specially trained La Mesa Police Special
Response Team operators and officers in
situations where lethal force is authorized by
law and department policy.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators and officers are authorized to use this rifle. Required training includes: CA POST certified rifle course, and regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

No expiration / no longer
in production as of 2001
and will not be replaced
when it becomes
unserviceable.

None
33 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Federal 40 Cal.

Ammunition
40 Cal. 147 gain premium
law enforcement tactical
ammunition round
14,500
rounds
The Federal 40 Cal.
ammunition round was the
primary duty ammunition
deployed during potential
lethal encounters, .

Per 1000
rounds/
$350.00
To be used wih Department issued MP5
weapons to address a threat if present or
feasible. It is only deployed in situations where
lethal force is authorized.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police SRT operators and officers are authorized to use this ammunition. Required training includes regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

Until expended None
34 Category 10/
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition
Federal 9mm
Ammunition
9mm 147 gain premium law
enforcement tactical
ammunition round
75,000
rounds
The Federal 9mm ammunition
round is the primary duty
ammunition deployed during
potential lethal encounters.

Per 1000
rounds/
$340.00
To be used wih Department issued 9mm
handguns and MP5 weapons to address a
threat if present or feasible. It is only deployed
in situations where lethal force is authorized.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police SRT operators and officers are authorized to use this ammunition. Required training includes regular qualifications as required by law and department policy.

Until expended None
35 Category 14/
Projectile Launch
platforms and
associated munitions
40mm Less Lethal
Launcher
The 40mm Projectile
Launcher is not a firearm. It
is a less-lethal system that
uses smokeless powder to
deliver 40mm projectiles
from a safe distance. It is a
single launcher, which
allows the operator to reassess the situation after
every spent munition.
23 The 40mm Less Lethal
Launcher is capable of firing
40mm Kinetic Energy
Munitions.

Per unit
$1000
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic
Energy Munitions are a less lethal use of force
option.

Only trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to use the 40mm Less Lethal Launcher. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

Appr. 15 years The ongoing cost for
munitions will vary
and maintenance is
conducted by
department staff.

APPENDIX A
2025 ANNUAL REPORT INVENTORY
36 Category 14/ (Bean
Bag Shotgun and
Bean Bag Projectile)
Remington 870 Remington 870 Bean Bag
Shotgun/Shotgun that has
been modified to fire less
lethal projectiles consisting
of a tear shaped bag filled
with #9 shot and has a
weight of 1.4 ounces.
14 The Bean Bag Shotgun is
capable of firing a less lethal
projectile with an effective
range of approximately 5-20
yards.

Per unit
$625.95
The Bean Bag Shotgun and bean bag projectile
are a less lethal use of force option.

Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on the use of the Bean Bag Shotgun are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The Bean Bag Shotgun may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

No Expiration None
37 Category 14/ (Bean
Bag Shotgun and
Bean Bag Projectile)
2581 CTS Super Sock
cartridge
A aerodyamic projectile
fired from a modified
shotgun that is a flexible
tubular material bag
435 The CTS Super Sock is a
transferred Kinetic Energy
Munition used as a less lethal
use of force option with a
terminal velocity of 280 fps at
10 yards Optimal ranges are
between 5 - 20 yards.

Per box of
5/ $35.50
The Bean Bag Shotgun and bean bag projectile
are a less lethal use of force option.

Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on the use of the Bean Bag Shotgun are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The Bean Bag Shotgun may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

Until expended None
38 Category 14/
Projectile Launch
platforms and
associated munitions
4557 40MM Foam
Baton
A 40MM sponge baton
rubber foam impact round/
Less-Lethal
689 This 40MM sponge baton is a
stabilised rubber foam round
with a optimal range between

9.84 ft to 98.4 ft.

Per unit
$35.00
The Sponge Baton munition is used as a LessLethal weapon designed to de-escalate a potenitially violent encounter.

Only trained La Mesa Police operators are allowed to use the 40mm Less Lethal Launcher. It is authorized for use only in situations where the use of force is authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subude dangerous and/or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage; protection from vicious animals; training exercises; and approved demonstrations. The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher may only be deployed to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

Until expended None

END OF INVENTORY

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-2896

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING THE LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT' S MILITARY EQUIPMENT

USE POLICY
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 ( creating Government Code Section 7070, et seq.), relating to use of military equipment by California law enforcement agencies;
WHEREAS, AB 481 seeks to provide transparency, oversight, and an opportunity for meaningful public input on decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used;
WHEREAS, the La Mesa Police Department is in possession of certain items of equipment that qualify under the broad definition of "military equipment" under AB 481; WHEREAS, AB 481 requires that a law enforcement agency possessing and using such qualifying equipment prepare a publicly released and written military equipment use policy document covering the inventory, description, purpose, use, acquisition, maintenance, fiscal impacts, procedures, training, oversight, and complaint process, applicable to the Department's use of such equipment;
WHEREAS, the Policy and supporting information must be approved by the governing body by ordinance, and reviewed annually;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa, having received the information required under AB 481 regarding the La Mesa Police Department' s use of " military equipment" as defined in said law, deems it to be in the best interest of the City to approve the Military Equipment Use Policy as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance will not be codified in the La Mesa Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves and adopts the following:

La Mesa Police Department Policy 706 - Military Equipment, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and Military Equipment Inventory, attached hereto as Exhibit " B," which are hereby incorporated by reference.
a) The City Council has made the following determinations:
1) The military equipment inventoried and presented to the City Council is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;

2) This proposed military equipment use policy attached hereto as Exhibit A" ("Policy") will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; 3) The equipment described in the Policy is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety (if any); and
4) Prior military equipment use complied with the applicable equipment use policy ( which included equipment now defined as military equipment) that was in effect at the time and any future use of items deemed military equipment will be fully compliant with the Policy approved by this Ordinance.
b) The La Mesa Police Department has made the Policy available on the Police Department's website for at least 30 days prior to the public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue and described in the Policy.
c) The Policy was considered by the City Council as an agenda item in an open session of a regular meeting, noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, at which public comment was permitted.
d) The Policy shall be made publicly available on the La Mesa Police Department' s website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. e) The La Mesa Police Department shall submit an annual military equipment report to the City Council, containing the information required in Government Code Section 7072, and the City Council shall determine whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in ( a)(1 )-(4) above. f) The City Council shall review this Ordinance, and vote on whether to renew it, on an annual basis at a regular meeting, in accordance with Government Code Section 7071 ( e)(2). g) The City Council approves the use of the Policy and finds that it satisfies the requirements of Government Code Section 7070( d).

SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published at least once in the East County Californian within 15 days of its adoption.

INTRODUCED AND READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California , held the 26 th day of April 2022, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 10 th day of May 2022 , by the following vote, to wit:

AYES : Councilmembers Baber, Lothian , Parent, Shu and Mayor Arapostathis NOES: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED :

ATTEST:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa , California , do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2022-2896, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC , City Clerk

SEAL OF CITY)

Policy
706

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy establishes guidelines for the acquisition, funding, approval, use, and reporting of military equipment", as the term is defined in Government Code section 7070. This policy is provided to fulfill the obligations set forth in Assembly Bill No. 481. These obligations include, but are not limited to, seeking approval on specific items deemed to be military equipment and requirements related to compliance, annual reporting, and community engagement regarding these items.
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Pursuant to AB-481, the following definitions are applicable only to the Department's current military equipment inventory and potential future military equipment acquisitions for operational needs.

Governing body" means the La Mesa City Council and Mayor.

Military equipment" means the following:

1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

2. Mine- resistant ambush- protected ( MRAP} vehicles or armored personnel carriers.

3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles ( HMMWV), two- and- one- half- ton trucks, fiveton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.

4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants.

5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.

8. Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard- issue shotguns and standard- issue shotgun ammunition.

9. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than . 50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue service weapons.

DRAFT*** Page 1 of 6

Military Equipment

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual

10. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.

11. Noise- flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.

12. Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service- issued handheld pepper spray.

13. TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long- range acoustic devices ( LRADs).

14. Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.

15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

The Department" means the La Mesa Police Department.

Military equipment use policy" refers to this Department Procedure and means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by the Department.

Law enforcement agency" means any of the following:

1. A police department, including the police department of a transit agency, school district, or any campus of the University of California, the California State University, or California Community Colleges.

2. A sheriff' s department.

3. A district attorney' s office.

4. A county probation department.
706. 2 POLICY
It is the policy of the La Mesa Police Department that members of this Department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 706. 3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of the Department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.

DRAFT*** Page 2 of 6

Military Equipment

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual
b) Identifying Department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of La Mesa Police Department ( Government Code § 7071 ). e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the Department' s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made. available on the Department website ( Government Code 7072).
g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUPIMENT INVENTORY AND USAGE GUIDELINES The La Mesa Police Department r~tains and employs a variety of military equipment to assist in safely achieving the furtherance of its objective to maintain public safety.

The La Mesa Police Department recognizes that the deployment of military equipment can have a significant and traumatizing impact on the community. These potential influences should be included in the decision- making process before approving the use of the equipment covered by this policy. The use of the equipment covered by this policy is subject to all other policies, regulations, and laws regarding the use of force.

The La Mesa Police Department recognizes that critical incidents are unpredictable and can be very dynamic in nature. A variety of military equipment options can greatly assist incident commanders, officers, and specific units in bringing those incidents to a swift resolution in a safe manner. The use of military equipment is restricted for use only in certain instances. While this procedure is wide- ranging, it is not all inclusive. There may be instances wherein unpredictable critical incidents demand the need for incident commanders to authorize military equipment to be used in a manner not outlined within this procedure. In scrutinizing those particular instances, the judgment of the incident commander influenced by the totality of the circumstances, public safety, officer safety, civil rights, and information available at the time will be used.

DRAFT*** Page 3 of 6

Military Equipment

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual
It is incumbent upon incident commanders, supervisors, individual officers, and specific units to recognize the particular circumstances wherein military equipment should be employed to enhance the safety of the public and officers, and to bring a critical incident to a safe resolution.

The following are the various types, descriptions, and guidelines for usage of military equipment currently employed or anticipated to be employed by the La Mesa Police Department:

See Attachment 1
706.5 APPROVAL
a) The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the Department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue ( Government Code § 7071 ). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following ( Government Code § 7071 ):

1. Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a.

2. Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, , or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

3. Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.

4. Collaborating with c:lnother law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this Department.

5. Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.

6. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.

7. Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above.

DRAFT*** Page 4 of 6

Military Equipment

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual
b) When military equipment is of a consumable nature and the Department's inventory becomes too low for operational purposes, the governing body authorizes the Department to acquire additional quantities of previously authorized military equipment to maintain availability for the Department' s needs. Acquisition of consumable military equipment shall be reflected in the Department' s annual report. ( Government Code§ 7072.) 706. 6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
On occasion, the Department may be required to assist other law enforcement agencies in a mutual aid request or support with day-to-day operational collaboration (i.e. pursuits, investigative unit assistance, joint law enforcement operations, etc.).

In certain mutual aid or operational collaboration circumstances, it may be necessary for sworn Department members to utilize military equipment in order to fulfill an assigned mission (i.e. SWAT requests, barricaded suspects in a vehicle, civil unrest, etc.). When sworn Department members utilize military equipment in instances of mutual aid or law enforcement collaboration, the following shall apply:
a) Department members are required to adhere to the Department' s Military Equipment Procedure and all policies and procedures outlined within the La Mesa Police Department' s Policy Manual, regardless of operational jurisdiction. b) Should the La Mesa Police Department request mutual aid from another law enforcement agency for assistance within the City of La Mesa pursuant to a mutual aid agreement, and military equipment is required during the course of the response, the assisting agency will be expected to adhere to their respective policies and procedures, particularly those governing the use ofmilitary equipment. Th~ La Mesa Police Department shall remain in charge ofthe overall incident in accordance with the mutual aid agreement. 706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use ( Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the Department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in Department inventory. 706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

DRAFT*** Page 5 of 6

Military Equipment

LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Policy Manual
DRAFT*** Page 6 of 6

17-,....._· £_
7f;-'f'\ CITYOI
1i~~LAMESA ~:;::,?:

JEWELof< heHILLS
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name
Description
1 · Category 1 / Skydio 2
2 Unmanned Aerial & Drone
Ground Vehicles
Category 1 / Autel Drone
Unmanned Aerial &
Ground Vehicles
Item Description
The Skydio 2 is a commercialgrade UAV ( Unmanned Aerial Vehicle)/ Drone. This is a
battery powered, remote
operated vehicle.

The EVO II is a commercialgrade UAV ( Unmanned Aerial
Vehicle)/ Drone. It is a
battery powered, remote
operated vehicle.
3 c~t~gorvi/ LT2- F Tactical Tactical Robot/ Unmanned,
Unmanned Aerial & · Support , remotely piloted, powered Ground Vehicles Robot : ground vehicle.
4 Category 1 / Avatar Robot Tactical Robot/ Unmanned,
Unmanned Aerial & remotely piloted, powered
Ground Vehicles : ground vehicle.
5 Category 3 / Lenco The Lenco BearCat is an
Wheeled Vehicle BearCat armored vehicle designed to
with Breaching provide protection during
Apparatus rescues and tactical events.
3/ 9/ 2022
La Mesa Pc :! partment
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity Capabilities
2 , Capable of providing live and
recorded video images
captured from aerial positions
during daylight hours only.
1 Capable of providing live and
recorded video images
captured from aerial positions.

Cameras are equipped with
night- vision and Forward
Looking Infrared ( FUR)
technology, allowing for use
during darkness.
1 This equipment is a battery
powered, remote operated
device. Equipped with two
cameras and two- way radio
capabilities.
1 : This equipment is a battery
powered, remote operated
device. Equipped with two
cameras and two- way radio
capabilities.
1 Capable of transporting
personnel and equipment
while providing them with
armored protection from
gunfire. It is designed to
withstand multiple bullet
strikes from small arms fire as
well as low level explosions.

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/ Training Required 1,418. 09 To be deployed when its view would Only authorized operators that have been fully assist officers or incident commanders trained and acquire FAA certification are allowed with tactical or other public safety and : to pilot this vehicle. This item may be utilized life preservation missions. ; during training exercises. 9,648. 04 To be deployed when its view would Only authorized operators that have been fully assist officers or incident commanders trained and acquire FAA certification are allowed with tactical or other public safety and to pilot this vehicle. This item may be utilized life preservation missions. , during training exercises. 28, 000. 00 Increases safety to the community and : Only trained La Mesa Police operators are officers by allowing operators to , allowed to use this robot. This item may be remotely gain visual/ audio data, deliver : utilized during training exercises. crisis negotiations phones, open doors,
disrupt packages, and clear buildings
without putting an officer or civilian in
harm' s way.
14, 350. 00 Increases safety to the community and : Only trained La Mesa Police operators are officers by allowing operators to allowed to use this robot. This item may be remotely gain visual/ audio data, deliver utilized during training exercises. crisis negotiations phones, open doors,
disrupt packages, and clear buildings
without putting an officer or civilian in
harm' s way.
297, 367. 00 To rescue police and civilian individuals , Only La Mesa Police operators that have been from dangerous scenes and move trained in the operation of the BearCat are personnel and/ or resources in support : allowed to drive this vehicle. This item may be of tactical operations in which there is utilized during training exercises. reason to expect potential armed
resistance requiring protection. Also to
enhance officer and community safety,
improve scene containment and
stabilization, and assist in resolving
critical incidents.

Expected
Lifespan
5-10 Yrs
5-10 Yrs
Appr. 15 Yrs
Appr. 15 Yrs
20Yrs
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
100- 500
100- 500
iN;~ e / This robot
is near the end of
its lifespan and
will be phased
out when
significant repairs
are needed.

None/ This robot
is under warranty:
and currently has
no associated
maintenance
costs.
1500- 2000

17,2'~ CITY OF ;.,.. ,.,." '
LAME c11~~7
1 SA
c:::::::;~) JEWEL of.,,_ H/LJ.S
f" '
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name
Description
Mobile
Item Description
6 Category 5 / 2014 Dodge Ram 3500
Command and
Control Vehicles
1 Command Pro Master
i, Vehicle ( MCV)
7 : Category 7 / ! Royal Arms
Explosive Breaching : Tesar 2
Apparatuses Shotgun
Breaching
Rounds
8 · iCategory 7 / ·· ·· · iCTS 2570
Explosive Breaching ! Shotgun
iApparatuses Breaching
Rounds
9 . ic~t;g~;:.,:ioT iColt M- 4 Rifle
iSpecialized Firearms !
iand Ammunition ( < I
1 . 50 cal)
3/ 9/2022
Shotgun breaching rounds are
specialty shotgun shells
utilized for door breaching.

Shotgun breaching rounds are
specialty shotgun shells
utilized for door breaching.

The carbine rifle is a
lightweight, air- cooled, gas
operated, magazine fed,
shoulder fired firearm,
designed for semi- automatic,
selective fire and is capable of
fully automatic fire.

Quantity
1 20
69 14
La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment Inventory
Capabilities Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authooied lJselrraining Required . Expected Lifespan
The Mobile Command Vehicle i $ 100, 000. 00 This vehicle is used based on the Only assigned personnel are allowed to drive and 20Yrs is equipped with
communication and tactical
planning equipment and is
capable of being used as a
mobile operations command
and dispatch center. The
vehicle is also capable of
transporting personnel and
equipment to and from
incident scenes.

Designed to breach heavy
locks, dead- bolts, and hinges
mounted inside of doors.

Designed to breach heavy
locks, dead- bolts, and hinges
mounted inside of solid oak or
steel doors.

The Colt M-4 is capable of
firing a .223 round.
specific circumstances of a given critical operate the Mobile Command Vehicle. This item incident, large event, natural disaster or may be utilized during training exercises. community event that is taking place.

5.oo! To defeat hea" Y locks, dead- bolts, and
hinges mounted inside of doors in as
Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are allowed to use the Tesar 2 round. Breaching
little time as possible, lessening the risk tools that are explosive in nature can be i,to the officers involved. , deployed any time operators determine that it is tactically necessary to safely complete a lawful
breaching, and then only when non- explosive
breaching methods are not practicable or safe.
iExplosive breaching may only occur in the field
after authorization by the Incident Commander
or SRT Commander. This item may be utilized
during training exercises.

4.14 To defeat heavy locks, dead- bolts, and : Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators hinges mounted inside of doors in as , are allowed to use the CTS 2570 round. little time as possible, lessening the risk Breaching tools that are explosive in nature can to the officers involved. :, be deployed any time operators determine that it is tactically necessary to safely complete a
lawful breaching, and then only when nonexplosive breaching methods are not practicable or safe. Explosive breaching may only occur in
the field after authorization by the Incident
Commander or SRT Commander. This item may
be utilized during training exercises.

Until expended
Until expended
2,011. 78 This rifle is only authorized for use by
specially trained La Mesa Police
operators in situations where lethal
force is authorized by law and
Department policy.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators : No estimated are authorized to use this rifle. Required training expiration/ this includes: CA POST certified rifle course, CA POST . rifle is being certified SWAT training, and regular phased out and
qualifications as required by law and Department will not be policy. This item may be utilized during training repaired when it exercises. becomes
unserviceable.

Replaced with
ltem# lO.

Annual
Maintenance
Cost
2,500
None
None
None/
Maintenance is
conducted by
Department staff. I
I

0 1'1~0
CITYOI
LAMESA
JEWEL ofthe HILLS
Item AB481 category/ Item Name Item Description
Description
10 Category 10 / Daniel The carbine rifle is a
Specialized Firearms Defense M- 4 ; lightweight, air- cooled, gas and Ammunition ( < Rifle operated, magazine fed,
50 cal ) shoulder fired firearm,
designed for semi- automatic,
selective fire and is capable of
fully automatic fire.
11 Category 10 / Speer LE . 223 Remington 62 grain
Specialized Firearms Gold Dot icartridge for duty rifles and , and Ammunition ( < Ammunition ' range training
SO cal) ,
12 Category 10 / Remington ; The Remington . 308 700 is a 13 14
Specialized Firearms . 308 700 Rifle ' bolt action single shot rifle. and Ammunition ( <
SO cal)
Category 10 / Hornady ELD 1 . 308 Winchester 168 Grain
Specialized Firearms Match Tap . cartridge
and Ammunition ( < Precision
50 cal) Ammunition
Category 10 / Heckler and This is a submachine gun
Specialized Firearms Koch MPS 40 firearm. It is a lightweight, and Ammunition ( < Cal. magazine fed, shoulder fired
SO cal) weapon, designed for semiautomatic, selective fire and is capable offully automatic
fire.
3/ 9/2022
La Mesa Pc ! partment
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity
12 Capabilities
The Daniel Defense M- 4 is
capable of firing a .223 bullet.
34, 000 The Speer LE Gold Dot
rounds cartridge is ammunition
deployed during potential
lethal encounters at long
distances. This 62 grain
projectile is designed to
maintain accuracy at long
distances.
4 of firing a .308 bullet.
2000 The Hornady . 308 168 grain,
rounds ELD Match Tap Precision
cartridge is ammunition
deployed during potential
lethal encounters at long
distances. This 168 grain
projectile is designed to
maintain accuracy at long
distances.
5 The Heckler and Koch MPS is
capable of firing a 40 cal.
bullet.

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use
2,795. 84 This rifle is only authorized for use by
specially trained La Mesa Police
operators in situations where lethal
force is authorized by law and
Department policy.

Authorized Use/ Training Required Expected
Lifespan
Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators , No estimated are authorized to use this rifle. Required training expiration/ the includes: CA POST certified rifle course, CA POST rifle will need to certified SWAT training, and regular be replaced if
qualifications as required by law and Department and when it policy. This item may be utilized during training becomes exercises. unserviceable.

0.58 To be used with all . 223 caliber assault • Only. specially trained La Mesa Police operators Until expended rifle precision weapons to address a are authorized to use this ammunition. Required threat with more precision and from training includes: CA POST certified rifle course greater distances than a handgun. It is , or CA POST certified SWAT training, and regular only deployed in situations where lethal , qualifications as required by law and Department force is authorized.
800: 00' To be used as a precision weapon to
address a threat with more precision
and/ or at greater distances than a
handgun. It is only fired in situations
where lethal force is authorized by law
and Department policy.

0.98 T~ be used ,;:, lththe Remington . 308
precision weapon to address a threat
with more precision and/ or greater
policy. This item may be utilized during training
exercises.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are allowed to operate this weapon. Operators
must successfully complete the CA POST certified
Sniper Rifle Course as well as regular Department
presented training and qualifications as required
by law and Department policy. This item may be
utilized during training exercises.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are allowed to operate with this ammunition.

Operators must successfully complete the CA
distances than a handgun, if present or POST certified Sniper Rifle Course as well as feasible. It is only deployed in regular Department presented training and situations where lethal force is
authorized by law and Department
policy.
qualifications as required by law and Department
policy. This item may be utilized during training
exercises.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are authorized to use this weapon. Required
training includes: CA POST certified rifle course,
Until expended
No estimated
expiration /
these firearms
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None/
Maintenance is
conducted by
Department staff.

None
Maintenance is
conducted by
Department staff. ,
None
None/
Maintenance is
conducted by
1,700. 00 This firearm is only authorized for use
by specially trained La Mesa Police
operators in situations where lethal
force is authorized by law and
Department policy.
and regular qualifications as required by law and are no longer in Department staff.

Department policy. This item may be utilized production as of during training exercises. 2001 and will not
be replaced
when it becomes
unserviceable.

CITYOF
11~8@1

LA MESA
JEWEJ.ofdu,HILJ..S
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name Item Description
Description
15 Category 10 / Heckler and This is a submachine gun
Specialized Firearms Koch MPS firearm. Itis a lightweight, and Ammunition ( < : 9mm magazine fed, shoulder fired
50 cal ) I weapon, designed for semiautomatic, selective fire and is; capable offully automatic
fire.
16 iCategory 10 / Federal . 40 · 40 Cal. 147 gain premium law Specialized Firearms Cal.
and Ammunition ( < Ammunition
SO cal)
enforcement tactical
ammunition round
17 Category 10 /
Specialized Firearms
and Ammunition ( <
SO cal)
Federal 9mm 9mm 147 gain premium law
Ammunition enforcement tactical
ammunition round
18 ICateg~ ry 12 / Noise-! CTS 7290 ; A Noise Flash Diversionary jFlash Diversionary IFlash Bang ' Device (NFDD) is a device that iDevices : ' creates a bright flash and loud
sound totemporarily divert
the attention ofsubjects in
19 Category 12 / Tear PepperBall
Gas & OC { Oleoresin Tac 700
Capsicum) Launchers
Munitions
3/9/2022
Ithe immediate area.

A system that uses high
pressure air to deliver
projectiles from a specially
designed launcher ( similar to
a paint ball delivery system).

Quantity
2 La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment Inventory
Capabilities
The Heckler and Koch MPS is
capable offiring a 9mm bullet.

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/ Trai~ ing Required Expected Lifespan
Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators No estimated are authorized to use this weapon. Required expiration/ training includes: CA POST certified rifle course, these firearms Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None/
Maintenance is
conducted by
1,700.00 This firearm is only authorized for use
by specially trained La Mesa Police
operators in situations where lethal
force is authorized by law and and regular qualifications as required by law and are no longer in ' Department staff. rounds ammunition round is the La
Mesa Police Department' s
primary .40 cal. duty
ammunition.
16,000 ' The Federal 9mm ammunition
rounds : round is the La Mesa Police
Department' s primary . 40 cal.
j duty ammunition .

Department policy.

0.31, To be used with Department issued
MPS weapons to address athreat if
present or feasible. It is only deployed
in situations where lethal force is
I, authorized by law and Department
li<:y.

0.31!To be used with Department issued
1 9mm handguns and MPS weapons to
address athreat ifpresent orfeasible.

Itis only deployed in situations where
lethal force is authorized by law and
Department policy.

Department policy. This item may be utilized production as of during training exercises. 2001 and will not
1 be replaced
Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are authorized to use this ammunition. Required
training includes regular qualifications as
required by law and Department policy. This item
may be utilized during training exercises.

Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators
are authorized to use this ammunition. Required
training includes regular qualifications as
required by law and Department policy. This item
may be utilized during training exercises.
when it becomes
unserviceable.

Until expended
Until expended
None
None
m~' ~~-~-~-•-~,~~~-------
33 9
Capable of creating visual and
auditory distractions during

48. 00 INFDD' s are used to distract and
temporarily disorient dangerous
Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators S Yrs
Itactical operations which
allows for tactical advantage
j during high- risk situations.
suspects by overwhelming their senses
ofvision and hearing. The distraction
allows officers toseize a moment of
opportunity tosafely resolve critical
Isituations during high-risk tactical
joperations.

Iare authorized to deploy flashbang devices. This
item may be utilized during training exercises.

Launches less lethal munitions --$- 6-00 ___ 0-'0'The P-ep_ p_e_ r_ B-al-1-La- u~~ her is a less lethal , Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on up to 150 feet. Munitions open : use of force option that can de- escalate the use of the PepperBall Launcher are upon impact and can disperse ' situations and increase safety to the ; authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use oleoresin capsicum {OC) public and officers by allowing officers : only in situations where the use offorce is powder or water that cause to use less lethal force from a distance. · authorized per Department policy, including but irritation upon contact or not limited to: to subdue dangerous and/or inhalation. Other munitions
are simply projectiles utilized
as a less lethal impact tool.
combative individuals to obtain a tactical
advantage; protection from vicious animals;
training exercises; and approved
demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may
only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

None
None
10

17/"'oi,. ,_:- y;,,~
1~d,
c::::::; ~-P .........__ ·
1-.'-
CITYOF
LAMESA
JEWEL oft.he HILLS
Item AB481 category/ Item Name
Description
Item Description
20 · Category 12/ Tear : PepperBall ! The basic PepperBall Gas & OC (Oleoresin Live Projectile projectile containing 2% PAVA Capsicum) • ( pelargonic acid vanillylamide)
Munitions irritant pepper powder
La Mesa Pc ! partment
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity capabilities
1545 Discharged from the
rounds PepperBall launcher, the
projectile will break on impact
and release 2% PAVA
pelargonic acid vanillylamide)
irritant pepper powder. It is
designed fordirect impact and
area saturation, especially in
confined, interior spaces.

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Autt, o'rized Use/ Training Required

2.28 The PepperBall Launcher is a less lethal : only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on use offorce option that can de-escalate ' the use ofthe PepperBall Launcher are situations and increase safety to the
public and officers by allowing officers
to use less lethal force from a distance.
authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use
only in situations where the use offorce is
authorized per Department policy, including but
not limited to: to subdue dangerous and/ or
combative individuals to obtain atactical
advantage; protection from vicious animals;
training exercises; and approved
demonstrations.The PepperBall Launcher may
only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
21 Category 12 / Tear PepperBall This is a PepperBall practice / 1925 Discharged from the $ 0.27 The PepperBall Launcher is a less lethal · Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on 1Gas & OC (Oleoresin Inert use offorce option that can de-escalate the use ofthe PepperBall Launcher are Capsicum)
Munitions
Projectile
training projectile. rounds PepperBall launcher, the
projectile will break on impact,
and is designed for training
purposes, orwhen chemical
exposure is not desired or
required. Inside is a non toxic
white power.
situations and increase safety to the authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use public and officers by allowing officers · only in situations where the use of force is to use less lethal force from a distance. ' authorized per Department policy, including but not limited to: to subdue dangerous and/ or
combative individuals to obtain atactical
advantage; protection from vicious animals;
training exercises; and approved
demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may
only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

Expected
Lifespan
1 Yr
1 Yr
22 Category 12/Tear PepperBall This is a solid PepperBall ~ 7 Discharged from the PepperBall launcher, the
projectile is designed to break
glass windows from a safe
distance.
2~70•This round is used for glassb~.;~king
purposes only (not to apply force to
Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on Until expended Gas & OC ( Oleoresin Glass Break round specifically designed to Capsicum)
Munitions
3/9/2022
Rounds break glass windows.
the use ofthe PepperBall Launcher are
humans). This round allows officers to · authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use safely break windows on vehicles and • only in situations authorized per Department buildings from a distance to gain policy. The PepperBall Launcher may only be tactical access and line of sight. deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy.

Annual
Maintenance
Cc>st
None
None
None

i7:'/!> -'"");:~
11~}S1'
CITYOF
LAMESA
JEWE! Lofth•HILLS
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name
Description
23 Category 12 / Tear : PepperBall
Gas & OC (Oleoresin , Marking
Capsicum) Rounds
Munitions
24 ' Category 12 / Tear Defense
Gas & OC ( Oleoresin Technologies
Capsicum) 5099 MK- 9
Munitions Magnum
L
Stream OC
oleoresin
capsicum)
Aerosol
Sprayer
Item Description
This PepperBall projectile
contains washable marking
paint
12 oz. Aerosol canister/ OC
Pepper Spray/ non-lethal tool.
25 ICategory 12 / Tear CTS 5440 QC Pyrotechnic grenade/ nonGas & OC (Oleoresin , (oleoresin lethal tool.

Capsicum) '
Munitions
capsicum)
Expulsion
Grenade
I--······----'---
26 ICategory 12 / Tear ' CTS 3440 OC i37MM OC Smoke Projectile/ IGas & OC (Oleoresin : (oleoresin
Capsicum) Icapsicum)
iMunitions 137mm muzzle
blast
3/9/2022
non-lethal tool.

La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity Capabilities
0 - may Discharged from the
be ' PepperBall launcher, the
purchase Iprojectile is designed to break
d in the on impact and release
future : washable marking paint on the ;
target
8 Aerosol that is equipped with a
trigger handle and will deliver
short burst of OC at an
effective range of 18- 20 feet.

OC is an inflammatory agent
Iwhich causes involuntary
Iclosure of the eyes ( open in 2-5
min) and respiratory
inflammation ( subsides in
j approximately 2 min.)
I
I
29 jPyrotechnic grenade that
15 discharges a high volume ofOC
through multiple emission
i ports designed mostly for
i indoor use, but can be
deployed outside. OC is an
Iinflammatory agent which
1 causes involuntary closure of
the eyes ( open in 2-5 min) and
respiratory inflammation
subsides in approximately 2
min.)
A short range OC cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, itwill disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. QC is an
inflammatory agent which
causes involuntary closure of
the eyes (open in 2-5 min) and
respiratory inflammation
subsides in approximately 2
min.)
Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/Training Required

0.24,This round is used to mark subjects with, Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on washable paint forlater identification , the use ofthe PepperBall Launcher are when making physical contact with the ' authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use subject is not safe orfeasible. only in situations where the use offorce is authorized per Department policy, including but
not limited to: to subdue dangerous and/or
combative individuals to obtain atactical
advantage; protection from vicious animals;
training exercises; and approved
demonstrations. The PepperBall Launcher may
only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, ordemonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.

49.95 ·Anon lethal use offorce option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation ofconflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

36.73 A;:;;~·i;thal use offorce option used to O~ly.~p~~ially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and who have received POST certification in the use safely resolve critical situations. ' of chemical agents are authorized to use i chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

8.98 A non lethal use of force option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators :
limit the escalation ofconflict and who have received POST certification in the use safely resolve critical situations. of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

Expected
Lifespan
Until expended
5 Yrs
None
SYrs
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None
None
None
None

i7b c ;:, 7 -.: ".('\ ITY Oi
1'1,~,:Q LAMESA
JEWELoftheHlllS
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name Item Description
Description
27 Category 12 / Tear CTS 5230B CS , Pyrotechnic grenade/ nonGas & OC ( Oleoresin ( 2- lethal tool.

Capsicum) chlorobenzyli :

Munitions dene
malononitrile '
Baffled
Canister
Grenade
28 Category 12 / Tear CTS 6230 CS : Pyrotechnic grenade/ nonGas & OC ( Oleoresin ( 2-: lethal tool.

Capsicum) chlorobenzyli
Munitions dene
malononitrile
Cannister
Grenade
29 Category 12 / Tear CTS 8230 CS : The smallest diameter Gas & QC ( Oleoresin ( 2- burning grenade/ non- lethal
Capsicum) chlorobenzyli ' tool.

Munitions dene
malononitrile
Outdoor
Tactical
Grenade
30 Category 12 / Tear CTS 2430 CS 12 gauge Shotgun Cartridge/ Gas & QC ( Oleoresin ( 2-, 1.5 grams CS Powder
Capsicum)
Munitions
3/ 9/ 2022
chlorobenzyli
dene
malononitrile ,
12 gauge
powder
projecticle
La Mesa Pc ! partment
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity Capabilities
90 Pyrotechnic grenade designed
for indoor use delivering a
maximum amount of irritant
smoke throughout multiple
rooms with minimal risk of fire.

CS is an irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).
95 Pyrotechnic canister grenade
emitting smoke through
multiple emission ports for 30
to 40 seconds. May be
launched or hand thrown. CS is
an irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).
94 , Specifically for outdoor use.

Can be hand thrown or
launched. CS is an irritating
agent and lachrymator
irritates the eyes and causes
tears to flow).
186 Powder or liquid filled, nonburning, fin- stabilized rounds designed to penetrate light to
intermediate barriers such as
windows and hollow core
doors. The projectiles break
upon impact and deliver agent
payloads of powder or liquid
throughout the adjacent target
area. CS is an irritating agent
and lachrymator ( irritates the
eyes and causes tears to flow).

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/ Training Required

36. 74 A non lethal use of force option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

26. 50 A non lethal use of force option used to ; Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

21.38 1A, non lethal use of force option used to ' Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
P,XP:. rci5F:> 5

9.00 A non lethal use of force option used to ' Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

Expected
Lifespan
5 Yrs
5 Yrs
5 Yrs
5 Yrs
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None
None
None
None

1.1::::, .;:~- y--,•.":'.'\ CITYOF
1~·~~, LAMESA
c::::::::::;. --, .. > JEWELofdH, HIU.S
1-.;.•
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name Item Description
Description
31 Category 12 / Tear · CTS 4431 CS 40 MM projectile 6 grams CS Gas & OC ( Oleoresin I (2- Powder Barricade
Capsicum) ·: chlorobenzyli .

Munitions dene
malononitrile
40mm
powder
iprojectile
32 iCategory 12 / Tear ! CTS 5230 CS Pyrotechnic grenade/ nonGas & OC ( Oleoresin 1 ( 2- lethal tool. capsicum)
Munitions
chlorobenzyli .
dene
malononitrile
canister
1grendae
J ____ ··-"'·-·········· I .......... ,. .. ,,,.~··-------.. --···· ............. ~···- 33 ICategory 12 / Tear ! CTS 3230 CS , 37MM CS Smoke Projectile/ I Gas & OC ( Oleoresin I (2-· non- lethal tool.

Capsicum) , chlorobenzyli
Munitions ! dene
malononitrile
37mm short
range
cartridge
34 ' category 12 / Tear CTS 3430 CS 37MM CS Smoke Projectile/ Gas & OC ( Oleoresin ( 2- non- lethal tool.

Capsicum) chlorobenzyli
Munitions
3/ 9/2022
dene
malononitrile
37mm
muzzle blast
La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment Inventory
Quantity
52 Capabilities
Kinetic Energy Munition used
as a less lethal use of force
option.
15 The largest diameter burning
grenade that discharges a high
volume of smoke and chemical
agent through multiple
emission ports. Specifically for
outdoor use. Can be hand
thrown or launched. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow) •
46 . A short range CS cartridge
33 delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

A short range CS cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/ Training Required

29. 00 1A non lethal use of force option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

35. 00IA- non leth-~ I use of force optio~~;~ dto- Onlyspe~ iallytrained La Mesa Poli~;·.;;;; ratorslimit the escalation of conflict and safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
iexercises.

8.98 1A non lethal use of force option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

I

8.98 1
A non lethal use of force option used to Only specially trained La Mesa Police operators limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
who have received POST certification in the use
of chemical agents are authorized to use
chemical agents. Chemical agents may only be
deployed to disperse any unlawful assembly,
protest, or demonstration in strict accordance
with AB 48 and Department policy. Chemical
agents may also be used during training
exercises.

Expected
Lifespan
5 Yrs
5 Yrs
5 Yrs
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None
None
None
5 Yrs None

CITYOI ", 17~ .:~''
0 J1~w ~ :' ii-, . LAMESA
JEWEL afdse HILLS
Item AB481 category/ Item Name
Description
35 Category 12 / Tear CTS 4630 CS
Gas & OC ( Oleoresin ( 2-
Capsicum)
Munitions
chlorobenzyli
dene
ma lononitrile
40mm
muzzle blast
Item Description
40MM CS Smoke Projectile/
non- lethal tool.
36 Category 13 / Long Long Range . The LRAD system is a type of Range Acoustical Acoustic Acoustic Hailing Device ( AHO) Devices
37 1C~ tegory 14 /
Kinetic Energy
Weapons&
Munitions
3/9/2022
Device
40mm Less
Lethal
Launcher
used to send public
announcement messages over
long distances.

This item is included in the
eventthatthe La Mesa Pa/ice
Department borrows and
operates an LRAD ownedby
another agency.

The 40mm Projectile Launcher
is not a firearm. It is a lesslethal system that uses
smokeless powder to deliver
40mm projectiles from a safe
distance. It is a single
launcher, which allows the
operator to re-assess the
situation after every spent
munition.

Quantity
17 0
6 La Mesa Pc ? partment
Military Equipment Inventory
capabilities
A short range CS cartridge
delivering a single munition.

Used outdoors, it will disperse
crowds, deny areas and
prevent violence. CS is an
irritating agent and
lachrymator ( irritates the eyes
and causes tears to flow).

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/ Training Required

29. 00.A non lethal use of force option used to ' LRADs can only be deployed in accordance with limit the escalation of conflict and
safely resolve critical situations.
all applicable laws and department policies
governing use of force and first amendment
events, and never as an acoustical weapon.

While the La Mesa Police Department does not
possess an LRAD, it is anticipated that one could
be borrowed from another agency for use at an
event in La Mesa, or during training exercises. In
such an event, only specially trained La Mesa
Special Response Team operators would be
authorized to deploy the LRAD.

LRAD systems produce much N/ A :· The device is used as a public announcement system to deliver
LRADs can only be deployed in accordance with
higher sound levels ( volume) all applicable laws and Department policies · than normal loudspeakers or
megaphones and can send
public announcement
messages clearly over long
distances.

The 40mm Less Lethal
Launcher is capable offiring
40mm Kinetic Energy
Munitions.
dispersal orders or other instructions to : governing use of force and first amendment unlawful assemblies or to deliver events, and never as an acoustical weapon . critical emergency information ( such as While the La Mesa Police Department does not evacuation instructions) to large
crowds.
1,000. 00 The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and
Kinetic Energy Munitions are a less
lethal use of force option.
possess an LRAD, it is anticipated that one could
be borrowed from another agency for use at an
event in La Mesa or during training exercises. In
such an event, only specially trained La Mesa
Special Response Team operators would be
authorized to deploy the LRAD.

Only trained La Mesa Police operators are
allowed to use the 40mm Less Lethal Launcher.
1t is authorized for use only in situations where
the use of force is authorized per Department
policy, including but not limited to: to subdue
dangerous and/ or combative individuals to
obtain a tactical advantage; protection from
vicious animals; training exercises; and approved
demonstrations. The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher
may only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy .

Expected
Lifespan
5 Yrs
N/A
Appr. 15 Yrs
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None
N/A
None/
Maintenance is
conducted by
Department staff.

117">..,·,, ,·-- y.,.::' '' '\ CITY OF
J'l~~SJ, ~.~(;
i, JEWEL ofw HILJ.S
LAMESA
Item AB481 Category/ Item Name
Description
Item Description
38 : Category 14 /
Kinetic Energy
Weapons &
4557 40MM A 40MM sponge baton rubber
Foam Baton foam impact round/ LessLethal
Munitions
i I
39c.; i;gory 14 / IB~~~ Bag
Kinetic Energy iShotgun ,
I
Weapons& ,
Munitions
l ~-··· ,. ,
40 iCategory 14 /
Kinetic Energy
Weapons&
Munitions
3/ 9/2022
j
crs 2581
isuper Sock
cartridge
lethal projectiles.

An aerodynamic projectile ,
fired from a modified shotgun :
that is a flexible tubular
material bag
Quantity
6 525
La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment Inventory
Capabilities
This 40MM sponge baton is a
stabilized rubber foam round
with a optimal range between

9.84 ft. to 98.4 ft.
of firing a less lethal
projectile with an effective
range of approximately 5-20
yards.

The CTS Super Sock is a
transferred Kinetic Energy
Munition used as a less lethal
use of force option.

Cost per unit Purpose/ Use Authorized Use/Training Required

35. 00 The Sponge Baton munition is used as a Only trained La Mesa Police operators are Less- Lethal weapon designed to de- allowed to use the 40mm Less Lethal Launcher. escalate a potentially violent
encounter.

It is authorized for use only in situations where
the use of force is authorized per Department
policy, including but not limited to: to subdue
dangerous and/ or combative individuals to
obtain a tactical advantage; protection from
vicious animals; training exercises; and approved ,
demonstrations. The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher :
may only be deployed to disperse any unlawful
assembly, protest, or demonstration in strict
accordance with AB 48 and Department policy.
vrn,~,v-----•-----------------•
625. 95 The Bean Bag Shotgun is a less lethal Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on J
use of force option. · the use of the Bean Bag Shotgun are authorized to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in
situations where the use of force is authorized
per Department policy, including but not limited
to: to subdue dangerous and/ or combative
1 individuals to obtain a tactical advantage;
Iprotection from vicious animals; training
Iexercises; and approved demonstrations. The
Bean Bag Shotgun may only be deployed to
disperse any unlawful assembly, protest, or
demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48
and Department policy.

7.l0!The Bean Bag projectile is a less lethal Only La Mesa Police officers who are trained on iuse of force option designed to be fired the use of the Bean Bag Shotgun are authorized Iat non- vital areas of the body to safely to deploy it. It is authorized for use only in gain pain compliance without placing situations where the use of force is authorized ithe subject or officer at risk of injujry per Department policy, including but not limited from physical contact. to: to subdue dangerous and/ or combative individuals to obtain a tactical advantage;
protection from vicious animals; training
exercises; and approved demonstrations. The
Bean Bag Shotgun may only be deployed to
disperse any unlawful assembly, protest, or
demonstration in strict accordance with AB 48
and Department policy.

Expected
Lifespan
Until expended
None
Until expended
Annual
Maintenance
Cost
None
None
None

Policy
706
La Mesa Police Department
Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/04, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• Area denial electroshock devices, microwave weapons, water cannons, long-range acoustic devices (LRADs), acoustic hailing devices, and sound cannons. • Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

La Mesa Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/04, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment - 2
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the La Mesa Police Department that members of this Department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this Department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying Department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of La Mesa Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the Department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the Department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:
[Insert attachment here]
706.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the Department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):

La Mesa Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/04, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by La Mesa Police Department
Military Equipment - 3
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this Department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy. 706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the Department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in Department inventory. 706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

DATE: February 24, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: La Mesa Police Department 4th Quarter Report 2025 Please see the attached La Mesa Police Department 4th Quarter Report for 2025.

Quarterly Report
4th Quarter 2025
Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
Prepared by Crime Analysis

1 Crime Trends and Statistics
The fourth quarter of 2025 concluded with a total crime rate of 17.4 crimes per 1,000 residents, down from 18.7 in the fourth quarter of 2024. Violent crime decreased slightly by 0.8%, while property crime declined by 7.4% compared to the same period in 2024.

FBI Part 1 Crimes, 4th Quarter Year to Date
Historical Violent Crime Comparison, 4th Quarter Year to Date Incidents of homicide, robbery, and aggravated assault decreased compared to the same period last year, while reported rapes showed an increase. Robberies declined by 2%.

2 Analysis of aggravated assaults indicates that 65% of victims knew the suspect, and 34% of aggravated assaults during the fourth quarter of 2025 were domestic-violence related.

Case Clearances
On June 29, 2025, at approximately 8:45 PM, an unknown male suspect entered the Shell Gas Station, located in the 5100 block of 70th Street in the City of La Mesa. Once inside, the suspect selected beer and chips and attempted to leave the store without paying.

A store employee behind the counter ran after the suspect as the suspect approached the exit carrying the unpaid-for merchandise. At the same time, a second store employee positioned themselves outside the store and blocked the exit, preventing the suspect from leaving. When the employee from behind the counter attempted to retrieve the merchandise, the suspect brandished a brown firearm toward the employee.

The suspect dropped the merchandise and was unable to recover it. He then fled the location on foot, running southbound on 70th Street.

Detectives subsequently created a Be on the Lookout (BOL) bulletin with still images of the suspect. In September 2025, the BOL was redistributed to surrounding law enforcement agencies with clearer images in an effort to identify the suspect. An officer from a neighboring agency later identified the suspect and provided updated photographs from a recent field interview. The suspect was arrested and booked into San Diego Central Jail for the robbery.

On October 21, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, an unknown male suspect entered the San Diego County Credit Union (SDCCU) located in the 8500 block of Fletcher Parkway in the City of La Mesa. Once inside the bank, the suspect presented a demand note to a bank teller, stating he had a bomb in his backpack. Fearing for her safety, the teller provided the suspect with an undisclosed amount of money. The suspect then fled the location on foot toward the nearby trolley station.

Later that same day, at approximately 7:30 PM, the same suspect was contacted at Grossmont Center Mall, located at 5500 Grossmont Center in the City of La Mesa, while attempting to rob the Vitamin Shoppe. Officers responded to the radio call from the Vitamin Shoppe regarding the attempted robbery and made contact with the suspect at the mall.

The suspect was arrested for the attempted robbery.

Detectives later determined the suspect was wearing similar clothing and appeared to match the individual observed in the SDCCU surveillance video. As a result, detectives added the bank robbery to the suspect’s charges, and he was booked at San Diego Central Jail.

3 Historical Property Crime Comparison, 4th Quarter Year to Date Compared to the previous fourth quarter, residential burglaries increased by 19.6%, with 72% of incidents involving no forced entry. In contrast, commercial burglaries decreased by 26%, thefts declined slightly by 1.2%, and auto thefts decreased by 33%.

Case Clearances
On November 18, 2025, at approximately 12:41 AM, officers were dispatched to the 4500 block of Normandie Place in the City of La Mesa regarding a residential burglary that had just occurred. The reporting party stated they were awakened by their dogs barking inside the home. The homeowner armed himself with a firearm and went to investigate, at which time he observed a male subject peeking around the corner of the front entrance hallway.

The subject was inside the residence in the hallway connecting the front door to the living room. The reporting party described the suspect as a male with dark hair and glasses, approximately 20 to 30 years old.

While officers were on scene, dispatch received a call from a neighbor in the 4400 block of Harbinson Avenue. The neighbor reported a male hiding in their backyard inside a playhouse. Officers responded to that location and located a male hiding inside the playhouse. The subject was detained, and a records check revealed he had an active misdemeanor warrant for his arrest.

The victim of the residential burglary was able to positively identify the detained subject as the same individual observed inside their home. The suspect was arrested and booked into San Diego Central Jail.

4 Supervised Persons in the City
Registered Sex Offenders
There are currently eighty-one (81) active sex registrants in the city, seven (7) of whom are transient individuals. Throughout the year, patrol officers conduct compliance checks on the registrants living in La Mesa. Three (3) registrants were out of compliance during the fourth quarter of 2025, meaning they have not completed their annual or monthly check-in and residency verification as required.

Traffic Unit
Traffic Collisions
2025
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD
Total Traffic Collisions 78 82 67 29 256
Collisions Involving Injury 41 45 38 14 138
Total Vehicle Occupants Reporting Injury 54 56 55 21 186 Occupants Reporting Serious Injury 2 2 4 3 11
Fatality 1 0 1 0 2
Top Three Collision Locations

1. Jackson Dr. and Murray Dr.

2. Fletcher Parkway and Baltimore Dr.

3. Jackson Dr. and Fletcher Parkway
Traffic Enforcement Operations 4th Quarter
Date Enforcement Operations Focus Location Total Officers 12/12/2025 DUI Enforcement DUI Checkpoint 4500 Spring St. 13

5 School Resource Officers
The School Resource Officer (SRO) met with school staff as requested regarding numerous issues on campuses throughout the City.

The SRO responded to approximately ninety-five (95) calls for service. Approximately seventy-eight (78) of those calls for service involved a school. The SRO took twelve (12) new cases, one (1) of which resulted in a detention as per 5150 W&I. The SRO submitted two (2) cases to the District Attorney’s Office and closed (3) cases by various means.

The SRO completed the following additional tasks/trainings:
• Presented at Threat Assessment training at LMPD hosted by San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center
• Participated in the presentation of bicycle donations at La Mesa Dale Elementary School
• Worked with the San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center to provide information to local schools on Behavioral Threat Assessment Teams • Journey Christian School Fun Run / Jog-A-Thon to support students as they ran. • Read “I’m Not Scared, I’m Prepared” ALICE book to TK-5th grade students at Journey Christian School
Community Engagement and Information Sharing
Social Media
Events and Presentations
During the fourth quarter, the Department hosted the 2025 Citizens’ Academy. The La Mesa Police Department’s Citizens’ Academy is a free six-week program that provides participants with an overview of patrol operations, traffic investigations, community Social Media Platform Followers
Nextdoor 28,214 La Mesa Residents
Facebook 9,972
X (formerly Twitter) 6,059
Instagram 5,945
Crime Prevention and Outreach Services
Neighborhood Watch Meetings 1
Community Presentations 1
Residential Security Inspections 0
Commercial Security Inspection 0
Community Events 13

6 policing, and other core law enforcement topics. The Department hosted 24 attendees during the academy.

Each year, on the first Saturday in December, the La Mesa Police Department volunteers alongside law enforcement agencies from across the county to provide local underprivileged children with a holiday shopping experience at no cost. Children are nominated by their schools and begin the day with breakfast at SeaWorld before traveling to Target, where each child receives a $200 gift card to shop for the holidays.

The 32nd Annual Shop with a Cop event was held on December 6th and served approximately 300 children from across the county. Funding for the event is raised throughout the year by participating law enforcement agencies through community-based fundraisers such as sporting events, barbecues, and raffles. The La Mesa Police Department will be hosting the 2026 Shop with a Cop event.

New Officers/ Lateral Police Officers
The police department hired two lateral police officers, Alejandro Tatenco and Justis Valenzuela, both of whom have started phase training.

Vacancies
The Department currently has four police officer vacancies and two Police Dispatcher vacancies. Applications are being accepted for the following positions: Police Officer Lateral/Academy Graduate and Police Dispatcher Experienced. Please visit the City of La Mesa’s website for more information or to apply.

Officer Training
Sworn personnel completed the quarterly firearms qualification.

Home Team Success Story
In September 2025, the HOME Team made contact with a couple who had been experiencing homelessness for over three years. Both individuals were in their early twenties and qualified as Transition Age Youth (TAY). The initial contact was made by a La Mesa Police Department officer, who referred the couple to the HOME Team.

Position Authorized Filled Vacancies
Sworn Officers 73 69 4
Dispatchers 14 12 2
Community Service Officers 6 6 0

7 The couple immediately accepted services and began working with the HOME Team to replace vital documentation and complete enrollment in the Coordinated Entry System (CES). They remained in CES for less than one month before being matched with Rapid Rehousing support. Rapid Rehousing is a short-term rental assistance and case management program designed to help individuals secure housing, obtain employment, and ultimately assume responsibility for rental payments.

The HOME Team assisted the couple with their Rapid Rehousing intake and follow-up appointments. In early October, the HOME Team provided transportation for the couple to view a rental unit in downtown San Diego. Their application was approved, and they successfully moved into the unit on October 20, 2025.

Department Demographics
Department Wellness
The Department remains committed to our staff's wellness and offers various resources to our police officers and professional staff. Our Peer Support Team responded to several callouts during the past quarter to support staff impacted by critical incidents. Our Facility Dog, Declan, has also been called upon to provide unconditional love and support to those team members impacted by trauma, stress, and the often-challenging realities of first Race/Ethnicity Total Officers Percent of Officers
Asian 2 2.94%
Black or African American 6 8.82%
Hispanic or Latino 13 19.12%
Pacific Islander 1 1.47%
White 46 67.65%
Grand Total 68 100.0%

8 responder work. The La Mesa Police Department contracts with a local mental health clinician who is culturally competent in assisting first responders with processing life and work trauma. This clinician is an invaluable asset and helps us protect our people so they can continue to protect you.

Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Reporting
The Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 prohibits racial and identity profiling by law enforcement and requires all agencies to annually report vehicle and pedestrian stop information, as well as citizen complaints of profiling, to the California Attorney General’s Office. The La Mesa Police Department began collecting stop information in 2022 in compliance with the legislation. The latest report from the California RIPA Board can be found on the California Attorney General’s website by following the link:
https://oag.ca.gov/ab953/board/reports
California Incident-Based Reporting
Historically, the La Mesa Police Department has reported crime statistics through the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary Statistics program. California and the nation have now transitioned to new standardized reporting systems: the California IncidentBased Reporting System (CIBRS) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). These new systems allow for the robust reporting of fifty-two offense types, an increase from eight offense types under UCR. Reported data includes case details to more accurately analyze crime trends statewide and nationally.

La Mesa Police Department
Quarterly Crime Statistics - 4th Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Homicide 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 -33.3%
Cleared 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Rape 4 5 5 2 2 6 2 7 17 16 6.3%
Cleared 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 N/C
Robbery 9 13 10 19 11 13 10 16 50 51 -2.0%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 3 5 4 10 22 24 -8.3%
Aggravated Assault 34 50 37 60 32 44 57 47 180 181 -0.6% Cleared 21 33 25 38 26 29 44 30 129 117 10.3%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Residential 17 8 11 20 15 13 21 18 67 56 19.6%
Commercial 23 16 23 11 10 15 21 8 54 73 -26.0%
Burglary Total 40 24 34 31 28 28 42 26 124 129 -3.9%
Cleared 6 10 6 7 8 8 11 7 34 29 17.2%
Car Prowl (Included in Theft) 34 26 19 24 21 23 24 68 103 -34.0% Theft > $400 92 73 54 58 65 43 76 58 242 277 -12.6%
Theft $400 or less 102 73 75 63 81 86 88 86 341 313 8.9% Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 129 164 144 583 590 -1.2% Cleared 26 26 14 26 31 26 43 50 150 92 63.0%
Auto Theft 52 37 41 30 29 22 31 25 107 160 -33.1%
Cleared 1 0 2 3 3 3 5 3 14 6 133.3%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Total Violent 47 69 54 81 47 63 69 70 249 251 -0.8%
Cleared* 53.2% 56.5% 51.9% 60.5% 61.7% 55.6% 69.6% 58.6% 61.4% 56.2% 9.4% Total Property 286 207 204 182 203 179 237 195 814 879 -7.4% Cleared* 11.5% 17.4% 10.8% 19.8% 20.7% 20.7% 24.9% 30.8% 24.3% 14.4% 68.4% FBI Index 333 276 258 263 250 242 306 265 1063 1130 -5.9% Cleared* 17.4% 27.2% 19.4% 32.3% 28.4% 29.8% 35.0% 38.1% 33.0% 23.7% 39.2% Violent Rate per 1000 Pop. 4.1/K 4.2/K
Property Rate per 1000 Pop. 13.3/K 14.5/K
Index Rate per 1000 Pop. 17.4/K 18.7/K
2024
Violent Crime
Property Crime
Totals
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 1/28/26
*Percentage change by number of crimes cleared.

N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Robbery and Theft - 4th Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Street/Highway 2 6 0 4 1 5 3 4 13 12 8.3%
Commercial 4 5 7 7 5 5 6 7 23 23 0.0%
Gas or Service Station 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 N/C
Chain Store 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 8 -75.0%
Residential 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 100.0%
Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 1 0 2 4 4 1 0 3 8 7 14.3%
Robbery Total 9 13 10 19 11 13 10 16 50 51 -2.0%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 2 5 4 10 21 24 -12.5%
YTD Clearance Rate 42%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr done 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Pocket-Picking 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 -66.7%
Purse Snatching 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 4 3 33.3%
Shoplifting 59 36 35 29 43 48 65 55 211 159 32.7%
From Motor Vehicles 55 46 41 39 35 33 44 37 149 181 -17.7% Motor Vehicle Parts & Acc. 38 19 16 12 13 14 12 6 45 85 -47.1% Bicycles 5 8 3 3 9 -1 3 10 21 19 10.5%
From Buildings 24 27 25 23 37 27 25 28 117 99 18.2%
From Coin Operated Mach. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
All Others 11 6 8 15 6 7 15 7 35 40 -12.5%
Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 129 164 144 583 590 -1.2% Cleared 26 26 14 19 31 26 43 50 150 85 76.5%
YTD Clearance Rate 26%
2024
Robbery
Theft
2024 2025
2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 1/13/26 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Patrol Statistics - 4th Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Primary 4818 4715 4920 4824 4294 4491 4796 4190 17771 19277 -7.8% Officer Initiated 2927 1892 2129 1882 2567 2491 2875 2266 10199 8830 15.5% Reports Taken 1376 1290 1330 1268 1131 1413 1412 1190 5146 5264 -2.2% Arrests Made 349 395 374 424 367 469 469 438 1743 1542 13.0% 5150 Detentions 112 94 85 76 92 74 76 99 341 367 -7.1%
Citations 473 434 499 448 643 639 442 163 1887 1854 1.8% Parking/ Muni Code Citations 113 117 79 112 82 137 166 88 473 421 12.4% Field Interviews 140 142 182 170 113 161 185 121 580 634 -8.5% 2024 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 01/28/26 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Additional Detailed Statistics - 4th Quarter 2025
Robbery Location Type 2025 Cleared % Solved
Street/Highway 13 5 38.5%
Commercial 23 12 52.2%
Gas or Service Station 2 0 0.0%
Chain Store 2 2 100.0%
Residential 2 1 50.0%
Bank 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 8 1 12.5%
Total 50 21 42.0%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Ghost Gun(s) Recovered Incident 0 4 0 0 2 4 2 5 13 4 225.0% Fentanyl Related Incident 4 7 6 4 1 6 5 3 15 21 -28.6%
Naloxone Used Incident 5 3 5 4 1 2 1 1 5 17 -70.6%
Reported Hate Crimes 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0.0%
A single incident may reflected in each appliable category, dependent on incident circumstances. 2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Race 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Religion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Sexual Orientation 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 N/C
Gender 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Citizenship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
None/Unknown Bias 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change Communications 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Violence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Vandalism 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 N/C
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
N/C: Not Calculable
2025
2025
There are 37 reportable bias motivations and 14 reportable offensive acts. To facilitate a more readable data table, only the bias motivations and offensive acts for reported hate crimes will be broken down under each category.

Robbery Clearances
Year to Date Totals
2024
Details of Hate Crimes Reported to Law Enforcment
Incidents of Special Study and County Interest
Crimes by Bias Motivation 2024
Crimes by Offensive Act 2024
Each reported hate crime is listed twice, once under the relevant bias motivation and again under the category of offensive act.

Data are only available for incidents reported to the La Mesa Police Department. 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 1/28/26
N/A = Not Applicable Page 97 of 151 N/C = Not Calculable La Mesa Police Department
Communications - 4th Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD YTD % Change 9-1-1 6656 6924 7490 6832 6366 6508 7103 6835 26812 27902 -3.9% 9-1-1 Answer Time 1 99% 99% 99% 99% 98% 97% 98% 98% 99% -1.0% Total Calls to the Department 25090 27256 28318 25413 24397 25345 27256 24749 101747 106077 -4.1% Total Calls For Service 2 15369 15225 16308 15001 14933 15274 16757 14917 61881 30594 102.3% Source:
9-1-1 6074 6300 7069 6535 6077 6185 6782 6471 25515 25978 -1.8% Text 9-1-1 3 32 11 4 9 8 6 13 9 36 56 -35.7%
Non-Emergency 4870 5370 6063 5792 5428 5690 6109 5393 22620 22095 2.4% Officer Initiated 2928 2270 2582 2444 3206 3059 3467 2780 12512 10224 22.4% Walk Ins 255 262 320 221 223 334 386 264 1207 1058 14.1% HOME 4 443 473 463 458 465 631 680 505 2281 1837 24.2%
4 The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) is an initiative of the City of La Mesa, in collaboration with the La Mesa Police Department.

LMPD Dispatchers route the HOME team (City outreach workers) as primary responders to non-emergency calls for service that do not require a police presence.
2024
2 Calls for Service include all calls that generate agency response and officer initiated contact including, assisting citizens, traffic stops, pedestrian stops, front counter contacts, extra patrol, etc.
3 Capacity to accept texts via 9-1-1 began January 2021. 1 9-1-1 Answer Time indicates the average percentage of 9-1-1 calls answered by the State Ringtime Standard. Beginning 03/01/23, the State Ringtime Standard is 90% within 15 seconds, and 95% within 20 seconds. 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 01/31/26
N/A = Not Available

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 24, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030
(6.7) OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO EL PASO STREET

AT AMARILLO AVENUE AS A THROUGH STREET
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa approve a Resolution amending Subsection 12.28.030 (6.7) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to El Paso Street as a through street to read as follows:
(6.7) El Paso Street a through street between Jackson Drive and Amarillo Avenue, except at its intersection with Amarillo Avenue.

Recommendation:

Adopt the attached resolution amending Subsection 12.28.030 (6.7) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to El Paso Street as a through street to read as follows:
(6.7) El Paso Street a through street between Jackson Drive and Amarillo Avenue, except at its intersection with Amarillo Avenue.

Fiscal Impact:

Funds for the installation of the all-way stop are budgeted and available in the Public Works Operations account 3107-6420.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 2 of 2
BACKGROUND:

The City received a request to install stop signs on El Paso Street and Amarillo Avenue.

Currently, the El Paso Street and Amarillo Avenue approaches do not have any stop control. The City contracted Kimley-Horn Associates to perform a warrant study at this intersection, and a study (Attachment B) was completed, recommending a minor street stop control at the El Paso eastbound approach with Amarillo Avenue.

DISCUSSION:

Currently the intersection of El Paso Street at Amarillo Avenue, a three-legged intersection, meets the restricted view criteria, requiring road users to stop to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street, and the use of a stop sign on the minorstreet approach based on CA-MUTCD guidance. Staff recommends the installation of a stop sign on the minor street approach of eastbound El Paso Street at Amarillo Avenue intersection.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending Subsection 12.28.030 (6.7) of the La Mesa Municipal Code, establishing exceptions to El Paso Street as a Through Street to read as follows:
(6.7) El Paso Street a through street between Jackson Drive and Amarillo Avenue, except at its intersection with Amarillo Avenue.

Reviewed by: Respectfully Submitted by:

Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Brianda De La Torre
Assistant Engineer
Attachments: A – Resolution- Amendment to Subsection 12.28.030 (15.2) B – Stop Warrant Study
C – Exhibit

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.28.030 (6.7) OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL

CODE, ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS TO EL PASO STREET AT AMARILLO

AVENUE AS A THROUGH STREET
WHEREAS, a minor street stop control analysis (Kimely-Horn December 9, 2025) of the intersection of El Paso Street at Amarillo Avenue concluded that stop control on the El Paso Street eastbound approach at the intersection with Amarillo Avenue is warranted due to the intersection meeting restricted view criteria for the use of a STOP sign on the minor-street approach based on CA-MUTCD guidance and a high number of pedestrians crossing El Paso Street near the intersection with those pedestrians being of primarily elementary school-aged children; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa may establish stop control at intersections proving to be warranted of said traffic control measures.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:

Subsection 12.28.030 (6.7) of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
(6.7) El Paso Street as a through street between Jackson Drive and Amarillo Avenue, except at its intersection with Amarillo Avenue.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 December 9, 2025
Michael Kinnard, PE, PTOE
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa CA 91942
RE: Minor Street Stop Analysis at Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street Dear Mr. Kinnard,
In accordance with your request, Kimley-Horn and Associates has prepared this memo to provide comprehensive minor street stop analyses for the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street, a three-legged intersection that currently does not have a stop-control but operates with vehicles stopping on the eastbound approach. The intersection meets the restricted view criteria for the use of a STOP sign on the minor-street approach based on CA-MUTCD guidance. Therefore, it is recommended to install a STOP sign on the eastbound approach of the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street.

This minor street stop analysis was prepared using 24-hour traffic volume and speed counts conducted on Thursday, April 11, 2024, when schools were in session. A site visit was previously conducted on Monday, April 8, 2024 and an all-way stop analysis memorandum was submitted on May 6, 2024, which is included as an appendix. The memorandum contains existing count and sight distance information.

The intersection is located near Murray Manor Elementary School and Jackson Park.

Minor Street Stop Control Analysis
Based on follow-up request from City of La Mesa staff, all components outlined in Section 2B.04 through 2B.06 of the California Manual of Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) were addressed when performing this minor-street stop control analysis. Section 2B.06 of the MUTCD, Stop Sign Applications, lists three conditions that must be considered within an engineering study. Generally, minor street stop control is installed where there are high traffic volumes, restricted sight distance, and/or collision history has been indicated by reported collisions of a type susceptible to correction by a stop sign. A summary of each condition is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street intersection analysis, when applicable.

Condition A: Traffic Volumes
Condition A requires the vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway to exceed 6,000 vehicles per day.

Based on the counts conducted, the vehicular traffic volumes on the through street, Amarillo Avenue, were 1,119 vehicles on an average day. This criteria is not met.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Condition B: Restricted View
Condition B stipulates that a restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway.

There are no visibility obstructions that results in limited sight distance at the intersection based on 85th percentile speeds of 30 mph and 200 foot stopping sight distance requirement:
• Eastbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling southbound ~ 350 feet (175%) • Eastbound traffic looking south at vehicles traveling northbound ~ 325 feet (162%) However, during the site visit, several northbound vehicles were observed making a left-turn at a high-speed. Though road users may have an adequate view of the intersection when vehicles are traveling at the 85th percentile speed, road users may not have adequate sight distance to make a safe turning maneuver when vehicles are traveling at these high speeds. Therefore, this criteria is met.

Condition C: Collision Review
Condition C requires that crash records indicate three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway.

Per SWITRS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023.

According to SWITRS collision data, zero crashes were reported. This criteria is not met.

Final Recommendation
The intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street meets the restricted view criteria for the use of a STOP sign on the minor-street approach based on CA-MUTCD guidance. Therefore, it is recommended to install a STOP sign on the eastbound approach of the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Joe Shultz, PE, TE, PTOE
RCE P.E. No. 84152

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Appendix A: Multi-Way Stop Analysis at Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street • Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications
• Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets
• Attachment C – Speed Survey Data Sheets
• Attachment D – Intersection Sight Distance Exhibit/Photos • Attachment E – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets • Attachment F – City of La Mesa Safe Routes to School Map

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Appendix A – Multi-Way Stop Analysis at Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 May 6, 2024
Mr. Michael Kinnard
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa CA 91942
RE: Multi-Way Stop Analysis at Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street Dear Mr. Kinnard,
In accordance with your request, Kimley-Horn and Associates have prepared this memo to provide a comprehensive multi-way stop analysis for the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street, a three-legged intersection that currently does not have a stop-control but operates with vehicles stopping on the eastbound approach. This multi-way stop analysis was prepared using 24-hour traffic volume and speed counts conducted on Thursday, April 11, 2024, when schools were in session. A site visit conducted on Monday, April 8, 2024. Existing counts are included as an attachment. The intersection is located near Murray Manor Elementary School and Jackson Park.

ALL-WAY STOP ANALYSIS
Per direction from the City of La Mesa, all components outlined in the Department of Public Works Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop (April 8, 2003) were addressed when performing this all-way stop analysis. The City of La Mesa Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop control lists five cases that must be considered within an engineering study. Generally, all-way stops are installed where traffic signals are warranted and/or accident history has been indicated by reported accidents of a type susceptible to correction by an all-way stop. Points are assigned to each warrant. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum of 45 points. A summary of each warrant is provided with the corresponding calculations for the intersection analysis, when applicable.

Case 1
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the point system is not applicable if Caltrans’ Traffic Manual Criteria is met. In Chapter 4, Signs, refers to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Part 2. Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation. Generally, multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. When an intersection meets one or more of the criteria, it should be considered for a multi-way STOP sign installation. A summary of each CA-MUTCD criteria with the corresponding calculations for the Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street intersection analysis, when applicable, is included as an attachment.

The intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street does not meet any of the criteria for a multi-way STOP sign installation based on CA-MUTCD guidance, therefore Case 1 is not satisfied.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Case 2 (10 bonus points)
Within the City of La Mesa guidelines, the subject intersection shall receive 10 points if the four conditions below are met. A summary of each condition is provided with the corresponding calculations for the Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street Avenue intersection analysis, when applicable. a) The street to be controlled is within a residence district Based on Section 515 of the California Vehicle Code, Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street is within a residence district.
b) The street to be controlled is classified/functioning as a collector According to the City of La Mesa General Plan, Amarillo Avenue and El Paso Street are classified as a Local Collectors.
c) The subject intersection is not within 600 feet from the nearest controlled intersection along the collector
The nearest controlled intersection (Kelton Avenue at El Paso Street) is approximately 1,050 feet from the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street. d) There is a parallel arterial highway that can be used as an alternative route Jackson Drive is classified as an arterial, generally runs parallel to Amarillo Avenue and could be used at an alternative route. Additionally, vehicles could cut-thru Amarillo Avenue to avoid traffic and signalized intersections along Jackson Drive.

All conditions are satisfied.

POINTS: 10

1. Accident Warrant (25 points)
Five points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an all-way stop control during any 12-month period prior to the investigation date.

Per SWITRS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023. According to SWITRS collision data, zero crashes were reported.

Total number of accidents correctable by all-way stop: 0 POINTS: 0

2. Unusual Condition Warrant (21 points)
Where unusual conditions exist, points are assigned based on engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. The 45-point minimum requirement may be waived and an all-way stop may be installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a documented problem.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 All-way stops may be justified based on projected volumes and accident frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within a specified period of time.

Unusual Conditions:

A. Adjacent school, fire station, playground, senior center and/or amusement park 0 Points – The intersection is located more than 500 feet from Jackson Park and Murray Manor Elementary school.

B. Any visibility obstructions which result in limited stopping sight distance based on either the posted speed limit or the 85% ile speed.
0 Points – There are no visibility obstructions that results in limited sight distance at the intersection based on 85th percentile speeds of 30 mph and 200 foot stopping sight distance requirement:
 Eastbound traffic looking north at vehicles traveling southbound ~ 350 feet (175%)  Eastbound traffic looking south at vehicles traveling northbound ~ 325 feet (162%) A sight distance graphic and intersection photos are included as an attachment.

C. An intersection leading to an arterial from an interior (circular) collector. 2 Points – Both El Paso St and Amarillo Avenue provide access to Jackson Drive.

D. Intersection with steep grades within 500 feet from the intersection on the downhill approach 0 Points – There is no grade that is greater than six percent in the vicinity of the intersection.

E. Intersection is on “Suggested Route To School” and no other controlled crossing is located within 600’
0 Points – Intersection is not located on the Murray Manor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Map and is located more than 600 feet from school grounds. The Murray Manor Elementary Suggested Routes to School Map is included as an attachment.

F. High Approach Speeds
1 Point – Per the traffic speed data collected at the intersection, the 85th percentile speed is 30 mph. Speed Survey is included as an attachment.

G. Curbside Facilities/Services
0 Points – There are no school bus stops, public mailboxes or transit stops adjacent to the intersection.

POINTS: 3

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411

3. Pedestrian Volume (20 points)
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the busiest hour of an average day.

Pedestrian crossing counts were not conducted at subject intersection since existing conditions indicate low volume of pedestrian are present due to the generally low density residual and adjacent intersections where pedestrian can also cross. 4 points are assigned based on the assumption that less than 10 pedestrians would be present during the peak pedestrian hour. This was verified to be accurate during the site visit conducted.

POINTS: 4

4. Traffic Volume (24 points)
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the eight busiest hours of an average day.

Hour
Ending
At: 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 NB 6 51 25 17 25 26 33 38 40 42 41 48 36 21 23
SB 13 26 25 15 18 19 22 25 29 29 29 22 15 11 12
Subtotal 19 77 50 32 43 45 55 63 69 71 70 70 51 32 35
EB 4 20 18 17 15 17 19 14 39 24 20 23 15 5 4
WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 4 20 18 17 15 17 19 14 39 24 20 23 15 5 4
TOTAL 23 97 68 49 58 62 74 77 108 95 90 93 66 37 39
POINTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In residence districts, if the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 35 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants 70% of the above requirements. The 85th percentile approach speed at the intersection of Amarillo Avenue and El Paso Street is 30 mph.

POINTS: 0

5. Traffic Volume Difference (10 points)
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach traffic volumes are nearly equal.

Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following table:
271 (24-Hour Minor St Approach Volume) = 31.8%
508+340 (24-Hour Major St Approach Volume)
POINTS: 3

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411

6. Caltrans Criteria (Chapter 4 Caltrans Traffic Manual) Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation regardless of the point system:

1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.

The intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street would not warrant the installation of a traffic signal.

2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include rightand left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

According to SWITRS collision data, zero crashes were reported at the intersection between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023.

3. Minimum traffic volumes – the total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but when the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements According to counts conducted, the average total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is approximately 88 vehicles for any 8 hours of an average day and major street traffic is below 35 mph. The vehicular volumes do not meet the required volumes to satisfy this criterion.

Based on Caltrans criteria, the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street does not warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation.

TOTAL POINTS: 20

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Final Recommendation
After performing all cases listed in the City of La Mesa’s Guidelines for Installation of All-Way Stop, it is not recommended to install an all-way stop at the intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street.

The all-way stop analysis above resulted in a total score of 20 points, where the minimum required to justify an all-way stop is 45 points (out of 100 possible points).

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Joe Shultz, P.E.

RCE P.E. No. 84152
Attachments:
 Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications
 Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets
 Attachment C – Speed Survey Data Sheets
 Attachment D – Intersection Sight Distance Exhibit/Photos  Attachment E – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets  Attachment F – City of La Mesa Safe Routes to School Map

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications

Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation.

Criteria A states that where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

The intersection of Amarillo Avenue at El Paso Street does not warrant the installation of a traffic control signal. This criteria is not met.

Criteria B analyses the crash history at the intersection. For this criteria, five or more reported crashes must be reported within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop. Crashes susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop include right- and left-turn collisions and right-angle collisions.

Per SWITRS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023. According to SWITRS collision data, zero crashes were reported. This criteria is not met.

Criteria C analyses the minimum volumes at the intersection approaches. This criteria has three parts.

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.

According to counts conducted, the average vehicular volume entering the intersection from both approaches of the major street is 44 vehicles for 8 hours of an average day. This criteria is met.

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor–street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

According to counts conducted, the average vehicular volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches is 75 vehicles for 8 hours of an average day. Crossing pedestrian counts were not conducted, but four points were assigned based on the field observations. This criteria is not met.

3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

Given the existing speed limit and roadway characteristics, the 85th percentile approach speed of Amarillo Avenue does not exceed 40 mph. This criteria is not met.

Criteria D states that where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 can be satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. This criteria is not met.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_003
NB SB EB WB Total
508 470 0 0 978

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 01 1 12:00 78 15 00:00 01:00 41 5
0:15 10 1 12:15 57 12 01:00 02:00 11 2
0:30 00 0 12:30 12 7 19 02:00 03:00 11 2
0:45 30 3 12:45 14 6 20 03:00 04:00 15 6
1:00 00 0 13:00 13 12 25 04:00 05:00 46 10
1:15 10 1 13:15 13 10 23 05:00 06:00 6 16 22
1:30 01 1 13:30 5 20 25 06:00 07:00 51 36 87
1:45 00 0 13:45 9 12 21 07:00 08:00 25 31 56
2:00 00 0 14:00 10 10 20 08:00 09:00 17 20 37
2:15 10 1 14:15 12 11 23 09:00 10:00 25 27 52
2:30 00 0 14:30 8 12 20 10:00 11:00 26 29 55
2:45 01 1 14:45 12 7 19 11:00 12:00 33 29 62
3:00 02 2 15:00 10 13 23 12:00 13:00 38 28 66
3:15 01 1 15:15 15 10 25 13:00 14:00 40 54 94
3:30 10 1 15:30 10 7 17 14:00 15:00 42 40 82
3:45 02 2 15:45 68 14 15:00 16:00 41 38 79
4:00 01 1 16:00 16 9 25 16:00 17:00 48 32 80
4:15 02 2 16:15 94 13 17:00 18:00 36 20 56
4:30 20 2 16:30 13 10 23 18:00 19:00 21 15 36
4:45 23 5 16:45 10 9 19 19:00 20:00 23 11 34
5:00 12 3 17:00 12 6 18 20:00 21:00 12 15 27
5:15 16 7 17:15 10 7 17 21:00 22:00 77 14
5:30 11 2 17:30 82 10 22:00 23:00 45 9
5:45 37 10 17:45 65 11 23:00 00:00 23 5
6:00 37 10 18:00 72 9
6:15 88 16 18:15 65 11 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 10 24 18:30 23 5 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 26 11 37 18:45 65 11 194 202 396
7:00 4 14 18 19:00 64 10 6:30 6:15 6:15
7:15 10 4 14 19:15 33 6 54 43 95
7:30 66 12 19:30 63 9 0.519 0.768 0.642
7:45 57 12 19:45 81 9
8:00 26 8 20:00 45 9 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 67 13 20:15 23 5 314 268 582
8:30 34 7 20:30 13 4 12:30 13:00 13:00
8:45 63 9 20:45 54 9 52 54 94
9:00 84 12 21:00 32 5 0.929 0.675 0.940
9:15 56 11 21:15 02 2
9:30 6 10 16 21:30 33 6 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 67 13 21:45 10 1 42 51 93
10:00 67 13 22:00 20 2 7:00 7:00 7:00
10:15 47 11 22:15 01 1 25 31 56
10:30 59 14 22:30 11 2 0.625 0.554 0.778
10:45 11 6 17 22:45 13 4
11:00 49 13 23:00 01 1 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 95 14 23:15 11 2 84 52 136
11:30 13 8 21 23:30 01 1 16:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 77 14 23:45 10 1 48 32 80
TOTALS 194 202 0 0 396 TOTALS 314 268 0 0 582 0.750 0.800 0.800 SPLIT % 49% 51% 0% 0% 40% SPLIT % 54% 46% 0% 0% 60%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Amarillo Ave S/O El Paso St
4/11/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_002
NB SB EB WB Total
348 340 0 0 688

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 2 4 6 00:00 01:00 3 3 6
0:15 1 1 2 12:15 5 4 9 01:00 02:00 3 0 3
0:30 0 2 2 12:30 9 8 17 02:00 03:00 1 1 2
0:45 2 0 2 12:45 8 6 14 03:00 04:00 1 1 2
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 6 8 14 04:00 05:00 1 4 5
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 3 4 7 05:00 06:00 2 2 4
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 6 10 16 06:00 07:00 3 13 16
1:45 3 0 3 13:45 6 3 9 07:00 08:00 18 26 44
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 7 9 16 08:00 09:00 25 25 50
2:15 1 0 1 14:15 6 2 8 09:00 10:00 17 15 32
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 5 11 16 10:00 11:00 16 18 34
2:45 0 1 1 14:45 7 7 14 11:00 12:00 20 19 39
3:00 0 1 1 15:00 10 7 17 12:00 13:00 24 22 46
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 7 5 12 13:00 14:00 21 25 46
3:30 1 0 1 15:30 7 12 19 14:00 15:00 25 29 54
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 9 5 14 15:00 16:00 33 29 62
4:00 0 1 1 16:00 9 9 18 16:00 17:00 29 29 58
4:15 0 1 1 16:15 9 8 17 17:00 18:00 34 22 56
4:30 1 0 1 16:30 6 4 10 18:00 19:00 29 15 44
4:45 0 2 2 16:45 5 8 13 19:00 20:00 14 11 25
5:00 0 1 1 17:00 12 6 18 20:00 21:00 12 12 24
5:15 0 0 0 17:15 6 3 9 21:00 22:00 7 11 18
5:30 1 0 1 17:30 7 6 13 22:00 23:00 6 5 11
5:45 1 1 2 17:45 9 7 16 23:00 00:00 4 3 7
6:00 1 1 2 18:00 9 5 14
6:15 1 3 4 18:15 9 4 13 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 2 2 18:30 6 2 8 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 1 7 8 18:45 5 4 9 110 127 237
7:00 4 6 10 19:00 6 2 8 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 2 3 5 19:15 4 4 8 30 29 57
7:30 2 8 10 19:30 1 2 3 0.750 0.806 0.750
7:45 10 9 19 19:45 3 3 6
8:00 4 7 11 20:00 3 4 7 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 10 5 15 20:15 3 4 7 238 213 451
8:30 6 6 12 20:30 2 3 5 15:30 15:30 15:30
8:45 5 7 12 20:45 4 1 5 34 34 68
9:00 5 4 9 21:00 3 2 5 0.944 0.708 0.895
9:15 6 6 12 21:15 1 5 6
9:30 2 3 5 21:30 0 1 1 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 4 2 6 21:45 3 3 6 43 51 94
10:00 6 2 8 22:00 3 1 4 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 3 6 9 22:15 0 1 1 30 29 57
10:30 3 7 10 22:30 2 2 4 0.750 0.806 0.750
10:45 4 3 7 22:45 1 1 2
11:00 7 4 11 23:00 2 0 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 3 5 8 23:15 1 0 1 63 51 114
11:30 3 5 8 23:30 1 1 2 17:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 7 5 12 23:45 0 2 2 34 29 58
TOTALS 110 127 0 0 237 TOTALS 238 213 0 0 451 0.708 0.806 0.806 SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 34% SPLIT % 53% 47% 0% 0% 66%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Amarillo Ave N/O El Paso St
4/11/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_001
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 271 297 568

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 00 0 12:00 64 10 00:00 01:00 10 1
0:15 10 1 12:15 25 7 01:00 02:00 01 1
0:30 00 0 12:30 59 14 02:00 03:00 11 2
0:45 00 0 12:45 61 7 03:00 04:00 00 0
1:00 00 0 13:00 42 6 04:00 05:00 10 1
1:15 01 1 13:15 43 7 05:00 06:00 22 4
1:30 00 0 13:30 2 10 12 06:00 07:00 46 10
1:45 00 0 13:45 45 9 07:00 08:00 20 42 62
2:00 00 0 14:00 9 12 21 08:00 09:00 18 16 34
2:15 10 1 14:15 99 18 09:00 10:00 17 10 27
2:30 00 0 14:30 13 2 15 10:00 11:00 15 18 33
2:45 01 1 14:45 83 11 11:00 12:00 17 15 32
3:00 00 0 15:00 34 7 12:00 13:00 19 19 38
3:15 00 0 15:15 97 16 13:00 14:00 14 20 34
3:30 00 0 15:30 77 14 14:00 15:00 39 26 65
3:45 00 0 15:45 57 12 15:00 16:00 24 25 49
4:00 10 1 16:00 85 13 16:00 17:00 20 21 41
4:15 00 0 16:15 47 11 17:00 18:00 23 27 50
4:30 00 0 16:30 23 5 18:00 19:00 15 16 31
4:45 00 0 16:45 66 12 19:00 20:00 59 14
5:00 00 0 17:00 8 12 20 20:00 21:00 4 14 18
5:15 10 1 17:15 54 9 21:00 22:00 75 12
5:30 01 1 17:30 46 10 22:00 23:00 33 6
5:45 11 2 17:45 65 11 23:00 00:00 21 3
6:00 10 1 18:00 45 9
6:15 20 2 18:15 74 11 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 5 18:30 14 5 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 02 2 18:45 33 6 96 111 207
7:00 22 4 19:00 12 3 7:15 7:30 7:15
7:15 97 16 19:15 12 3 23 44 66
7:30 4 14 18 19:30 11 2 0.639 0.579 0.688
7:45 5 19 24 19:45 24 6
8:00 53 8 20:00 12 3 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 78 15 20:15 01 1 175 186 361
8:30 21 3 20:30 15 6 14:00 13:30 14:00
8:45 44 8 20:45 26 8 39 36 65
9:00 61 7 21:00 32 5 0.750 0.750 0.774
9:15 54 9 21:15 00 0
9:30 33 6 21:30 12 3 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 32 5 21:45 31 4 38 58 96
10:00 33 6 22:00 11 2 7:15 7:30 7:15
10:15 23 5 22:15 10 1 23 44 66
10:30 47 11 22:30 11 2 0.639 0.579 0.688
10:45 65 11 22:45 01 1
11:00 41 5 23:00 00 0 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 32 5 23:15 10 1 43 48 91
11:30 54 9 23:30 00 0 16:45 16:15 16:45
11:45 58 13 23:45 11 2 23 28 51
TOTALS 0 0 96 111 207 TOTALS 0 0 175 186 361 0.719 0.583 0.638 SPLIT % 0% 0% 46% 54% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 48% 52% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
El Paso St W/O Amarillo Ave
4/11/2024

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15‐Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00

NB SB EB WB

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment C – Speed Survey Data Sheets

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_002
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 0021000000000 3 0001200000000 3 0022200000000 61:00 0030000000000 3 0000000000000 0 0030000000000 32:00 0010000000000 1 0001000000000 1 0011000000000 23:00 0010000000000 1 0001000000000 1 0011000000000 24:00 0000100000000 1 0021000000000 3 0021100000000 45:00 0011000000000 2 0002000000000 2 0013000000000 46:00 0010000000000 1 0028000000000 10 0038000000000 117:00 0067300000000 16 0097800000000 24 0 0 15 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 408:00 0076300000000 16 0 0 10 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 17 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389:00 0083100000000 12 0092110000000 13 0 0 17 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 10:00 0066200000000 14 0066200000000 14 0 0 12 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2811:00 0 0 10 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0075200000000 14 0 0 17 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3012:00 0 0 11 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 10 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 21 13 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 13:00 0088100000000 17 0 0 11 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 19 15 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 14:00 0088110000000 18 0 0 9 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 17 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 15:00 0 0 11 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 13 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 24 23 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 16:00 0 0 10 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 10 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 20 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 17:00 0 0 17 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 11 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 28 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 18:00 0 0 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0077000000000 14 0 0 17 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 19:00 0062010000000 9 0054200000000 11 0 0 11 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20:00 0015100000000 7 0054100000000 10 0069200000000 17 21:00 0032000000000 5 0052300000000 10 0084300000000 15 22:00 0013100000000 5 0021010000000 4 0034110000000 9
23:00 0011010000000 3 0012000000000 3 0023010000000 6
Totals 0 0 133 110 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 134 109 46 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 297 0 0 267 219 71 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 569 % of Totals 49% 40% 9% 1% 100% 45% 37% 15% 3% 100% 47% 38% 12% 2% 100% 00:00 ‐ 12:00 0 0 46 28 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 45 43 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 91 71 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 % 0% 0% 17% 10% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 32% 0% 0% 17% 16% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 39% 0% 0% 33% 26% 11% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 71% Peak Hour 0:00 0:00 11:45 7:00 7:45 11:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 0:00 0:00 8:15 7:15 7:00 8:30 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:30 0:00 0:00 8:15 7:30 7:00 8:30 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 0 0 12 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 12 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 21 17 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 12:00 ‐ 24:00 0 0 87 82 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 89 66 29 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 176 148 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 376 % 0% 0% 32% 30% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 68% 0% 0% 33% 24% 11% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 0% 0% 65% 54% 15% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 138% Peak Hour 12:00 12:00 17:00 14:45 14:30 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:45 12:00 12:00 12:30 15:15 14:00 15:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:30 12:00 12:00 16:45 14:45 14:30 12:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:45 Peak Volume 0 0 17 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 14 11 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 28 23 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 07:00 ‐ 09:00 0 0 13 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 19 16 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 32 29 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 % 0% 0% 5% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 12% 0% 0% 7% 6% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 0% 0% 12% 11% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:00 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:15 7:00 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:30 7:00 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 0 0 10 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 10 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 19 17 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 16:00 ‐ 18:00 0 0 27 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 21 15 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 48 35 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 % 0% 0% 10% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 0% 8% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 0% 0% 18% 13% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% Peak Hour 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 Peak Volume 0 0 17 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 13 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 28 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 NORTHBOUND 22 25 26 29 33 272
297
TOTALS 22 25 26 30 34 569
SOUTHBOUND 22 26 26 31 34

HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles 15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Amarillo Ave N/O El Paso St
4/11/2024
Time

NORTHBOUND
Total

SOUTHBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_002
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Amarillo Ave N/O El Paso St
4/11/2024
Time

NORTHBOUND
Total

SOUTHBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
0:00 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 00:15 10000000000 1 01000000000 1 0011000000000 20:30 00000000000 0 00200000000 2 0000200000000 20:45 11000000000 2 00000000000 0 0011000000000 21:00 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 01:15 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 01:30 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 01:45 30000000000 3 00000000000 0 0030000000000 32:00 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 02:15 10000000000 1 00000000000 0 0010000000000 12:30 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 02:45 00000000000 0 01000000000 1 0001000000000 13:00 00000000000 0 01000000000 1 0001000000000 13:15 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 03:30 10000000000 1 00000000000 0 0010000000000 1 3:45 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 0
4:00 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 0
4:15 00000000000 0 10000000000 1 0010000000000 1
4:30 00100000000 1 00000000000 0 0000100000000 1
4:45 00000000000 0 11000000000 2 0011000000000 2
5:00 00000000000 0 01000000000 1 0001000000000 1
5:15 00000000000 0 00000000000 0 0000000000000 0
5:30 10000000000 1 00000000000 0 0010000000000 1
5:45 01000000000 1 01000000000 1 0002000000000 2
6:00 10000000000 1 01000000000 1 0011000000000 2
6:15 00000000000 0 21000000000 3 0021000000000 3
6:30 00000000000 0 01000000000 1 0001000000000 1
6:45 00000000000 0 05000000000 5 0005000000000 5
7:00 03100000000 4 21200000000 5 0024300000000 9
7:15 11000000000 2 20100000000 3 0031100000000 57:30 11000000000 2 33200000000 8 0044200000000 107:45 42200000000 8 23300000000 8 0065500000000 168:00 11100000000 3 15000000000 6 0026100000000 98:15 32000000000 5 40000000000 4 0072000000000 98:30 22200000000 6 21210000000 6 0043410000000 128:45 11000000000 2 33000000000 6 0044000000000 89:00 30100000000 4 30100000000 4 0060200000000 89:15 31000000000 4 30010000000 4 0061010000000 89:30 01000000000 1 12000000000 3 0013000000000 49:45 21000000000 3 20000000000 2 0041000000000 5 10:00 23100000000 6 02000000000 2 0025100000000 810:15 30000000000 3 22100000000 5 0052100000000 810:30 12000000000 3 41000000000 5 0053000000000 810:45 01100000000 2 01100000000 2 0002200000000 4 11:00 51000000000 6 11000000000 2 0062000000000 8
11:15 11100000000 3 31100000000 5 0042200000000 8
11:30 01000000000 1 12100000000 4 0013100000000 5
11:45 41100000000 6 21000000000 3 0062100000000 9
15‐MINUTE BREAKDOWN

Day: Thursday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_002
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Amarillo Ave N/O El Paso St
4/11/2024
Time

NORTHBOUND
Total

SOUTHBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
12:00 20000000000 2 20200000000 4 0040200000000 612:15 32000000000 5 12100000000 4 0044100000000 912:30 33010000000 7 41010000000 6 0074020000000 1312:45 33100000000 7 32100000000 6 0065200000000 1313:00 13000000000 4 52010000000 8 0065010000000 1213:15 20000000000 2 21000000000 3 0041000000000 513:30 23000000000 5 33200000000 8 0056200000000 1313:45 32100000000 6 11000000000 2 0043100000000 814:00 32000000000 5 33100000000 7 0065100000000 1214:15 12000000000 3 01100000000 2 0013100000000 514:30 21000000000 3 25300000000 10 0046300000000 1314:45 23110000000 7 41100000000 6 0064210000000 1315:00 34200000000 9 32100000000 6 0066300000000 1515:15 33100000000 7 22100000000 5 0055200000000 1215:30 24000000000 6 54110000000 11 0078110000000 17 15:45 33000000000 6 31010000000 5 0064010000000 11
16:00 22100000000 5 24010000000 7 0046110000000 12
16:15 43100000000 8 31300000000 7 0074400000000 15
16:30 22100000000 5 12000000000 3 0034100000000 8
16:45 23000000000 5 41100000000 6 0064100000000 11
17:00 44000000000 8 51000000000 6 0095000000000 14
17:15 40100000000 5 11100000000 3 0051200000000 8
17:30 52000000000 7 32100000000 6 0084100000000 13
17:45 44000000000 8 23200000000 7 0067200000000 15
18:00 15000000000 6 32000000000 5 0047000000000 11
18:15 42100000000 7 21000000000 3 0063100000000 10
18:30 23000000000 5 11000000000 2 0034000000000 7
18:45 31000000000 4 13000000000 4 0044000000000 8
19:00 30010000000 4 02000000000 2 0032010000000 6
19:15 21000000000 3 40000000000 4 0061000000000 719:30 01000000000 1 02000000000 2 0003000000000 319:45 10000000000 1 10200000000 3 0020200000000 420:00 01000000000 1 31000000000 4 0032000000000 520:15 03000000000 3 11000000000 2 0014000000000 520:30 10000000000 1 11100000000 3 0021100000000 420:45 01100000000 2 01000000000 1 0002100000000 321:00 21000000000 3 20000000000 2 0041000000000 521:15 10000000000 1 11200000000 4 0021200000000 521:30 00000000000 0 00100000000 1 0000100000000 121:45 01000000000 1 21000000000 3 0022000000000 422:00 11000000000 2 00010000000 1 0011010000000 322:15 00000000000 0 01000000000 1 0001000000000 122:30 02000000000 2 20000000000 2 0022000000000 422:45 00100000000 1 00000000000 0 0000100000000 1 23:00 10000000000 1 00000000000 0 0010000000000 1
23:15 00010000000 1 00000000000 0 0000010000000 1
23:30 01000000000 1 10000000000 1 0011000000000 2
23:45 00000000000 0 02000000000 2 0002000000000 2
Totals 0 0 133 110 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 134 109 46 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 297 0 0 267 219 71 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 569 % of Totals 0% 0% 49% 40% 9% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 45% 37% 15% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 47% 38% 12% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 15‐MINUTE BREAKDOWN

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment D – Intersection Sight Distance Graphic

DECISION POINT

MEASURED AT A
10' OFFSET

FROM THE EDGE

OF TRAVEL WAY
325' SSD AVAILABLE
350' SSD AVAILABLE AMARILLO AVE EL PASO ST NORTH
A speed survey conducted on
Amarillo Avenue, resulting in an
85th percentile speed of 30 MPH
which is used to determine the
required Stopping Sight Distance
(SSD). Stopping Sight Distance
(SSD) required for 30 MPH is 200'
for movements from El Paso Street
per HDM 201.1.

Right turn and left turn SSD
requirements are met for El Paso
Street.

Required Stopping Sight Distance
Decision Point

NOTES LEGEND

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment E – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets

Warrant Title Standard
1 Eight-Hour Volume The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that 1 of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day. In applying each condition the major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours.
- Condition A Part 1 Part 2 A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100%/80% columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection, or - Condition B Part 1 Part 2 A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100%/80% columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection. 2 Four-Hour Volume See Figure 4C-1 in MUTCD.
3 Peak Hour Volume This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.

The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following 2 categories are met:

A. If all 3 of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour of an average day:

1. The total stopped time delay experience by the traffic on 1 minor-street approach (1 direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a 1-lane approach; or 5 vehicle-hours for a 2-lane approach, and

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (1 direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for 1 moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for 2 moving lanes, and

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vph for intersections with 3 approaches or 800 vph for intersections with 4 or more approaches.

B. See Figure 4C-3 in MUTCD.
4 Pedestrian Volume See Page 4C-6 in MUTCD
5 School Crossing See Page 4C-6 in MUTCD
6 Coordinated Signal System See Page 4C-8 in MUTCD
7 Crash Experience The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:

A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and
B. 5 or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12- month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and
C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vph given in both the 80% columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80% columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80% of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.
8 Roadway Network See page 4C-9 in MUTCD

TRAFFIC SIGNAL VOLUME WARRANT ANALYSIS (2000 MUTCD)
MAJOR STREET: Amarillo Ave NB SB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1 MINOR STREET: El Paso St EB WB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
CITY, STATE: La Mesa, CA
COMMENTS:

ISOLATED COMMUNITY WITH POPULATION LESS THAN 10,000 (Y OR N): N 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED GREATER THAN 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET (Y OR N): N NB SB Total EB WB Minor Street
Approach Approach Approach Approach Heavy Leg
06:00 AM TO 07:00 AM 6 13 19 4 4
07:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 51 26 77 20 20
08:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 25 25 50 18 18
09:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 17 15 32 17 17
10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 25 18 43 15 15
11:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 26 19 45 17 17
12:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 33 22 55 19 19
01:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 38 25 63 14 14
02:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 40 29 69 39 39
03:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 42 29 71 24 24
04:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 41 29 70 20 20
05:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 48 22 70 23 23
06:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 36 15 51 15 15
07:00 PM TO 08:00 PM 21 11 32 5 5
08:00 PM TO 09:00 PM 23 12 35 4 4
09:00 PM TO 10:00 PM 7 11 18 7 7
05/06/24
Kimley-Horn and Associates
Amarillo Ave El Paso St
K:\SND_TPTO\095198039-La Mesa Traffic On Call\ALL WAY STOP ANALYSIS\Stop Analysis - El Paso and Amarillo\CAMUTCD Signal Warrants w Graphs.xls \ Intersection Info

TRAFFIC SIGNAL VOLUME WARRANT ANALYSIS (2000 MUTCD)
MAJOR STREET: Amarillo Ave NB SB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1 MINOR STREET: El Paso St EB WB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
CITY, STATE: La Mesa, CA
COMMENTS: 0
0 ISOLATED COMMUNITY WITH POPULATION LESS THAN 10,000 (Y OR N): N 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED GREATER THAN 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET (Y OR N): N MAJOR ST MINOR ST WARRANT 2 WARRANT 3

TWO-WAY

TRAFFIC

TRAFFIC

HEAVY LEG
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
Four-Hour Peak Hour
THRESHOLD VALUES 500 150 750 75 400 120 600 60
06:00 AM TO 07:00 AM 19 4
07:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 77 20
08:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 50 18
09:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 32 17
10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 43 15
11:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 45 17
12:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 55 19
01:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 63 14
02:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 69 39
03:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 71 24
04:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 70 20
05:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 70 23
06:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 51 15
07:00 PM TO 08:00 PM 32 5
08:00 PM TO 09:00 PM 35 4
09:00 PM TO 10:00 PM 18 7
800 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 HRS NEEDED 1 HR NEEDED
NOT

SATISFIED
NOT

SATISFIED
05/06/24
Kimley-Horn and Associates
8 HOURS NEEDED for both Condition A & B
WARRANT 1 - Condition A, Part 1 WARRANT 1 - Condition A, Part 2 WARRANT 1 - Condition B, Part 1

NOT SATISFIED
8 HOURS NEEDED 8 HOURS NEEDED

NOT SATISFIED NOT SATISFIED
WARRANT 1 - Condition B, Part 2
5/6/2024, 2:05 PM
K:\SND_TPTO\095198039-La Mesa Traffic On Call\ALL WAY STOP ANALYSIS\Stop Analysis - El Paso and Amarillo\CAMUTCD Signal Warrants w Graphs.xls \ Calculations Warrants 1,2,3

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment F – Murray Manor Elementary Safe Routes to School Map

n

EL PASO
BOB

JACKSON

LAKE MURRAY
DUGAN
KELTON
LAIRD

AMARILLO
DALLAS
SAMUEL
ALIDA
ZETA
MANON

BLUE LAKE
TEX
PAT

MICHELLE
KAPPA
DERK

MIDLAND
ZORA

STADLER
CLAY

YORKSHIRE
RAINEY

DALHART

MARENGO
AZTEC
NENTRA
TAU

AVENORRA
LAMBDA
DENTON

BINNEY JEANETTE

KIMBERLY

PRIVATE

TANGLEROD
CHAZ

ABILENE

CARLETTE

COWLES MTN
SARAH

HIGHGATE
WARREN

PRIVATE
CLAY
Murray Manor
Elementary
School
Jackson
Park
ù
ù
í
ææ ææ æ ææ æ
0 0.0625 0.125 F Miles
WSB
WSB
Legend
Crosswalk Monitor
Parent Suggested Routes
Marked Crosswalk
õ 1/4 Mile (5 Min Walk)
n School Entrance
í
ùååCommunity Watch Route
High Visibility Crosswalk
WSB Walking School Bus
Gathering Spot

9'
R1-1
1 REQUIRED
(1 NEW POST)

EL PASO ST

AMARILLO AVE

INSTALL NEW POST
WITH "STOP" (R1-1)

INSTALL THERMO
"STOP" LEGEND
INSTALL 1' WIDE

WHITE THERMO STOP BAR
9' FROM CENTER
OF TRAVELED WAY (L = 16.5')
Feet
0 20 40

PROPOSED

STOP SIGN AND

THERMO ON EL

PASO ST AT
AMARILLO AVE Page 130 of 151

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 24, 2026
SUBJECT: SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO SAN DIEGO

COMMUNITY POWER FOR GRANT FUNDING OF THE

LA MESA E-BIKE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application to San Diego Community Power Clean Energy Program to provide funding for the La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program and if awarded, accepting and appropriating funds for the project?
Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application to San Diego Community Power Clean Energy Program to provide funding for the La Mesa EBike Incentive Program and if awarded, accepting and appropriating funds for the project.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact on the submittal of the grant application. The City is seeking $50,000 and if awarded, this amount would support expenditures approved in the FY26-27 Public Works Environmental Services Budget for the EBike incentive program.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

Climate Action Plan Reduction Strategy:
 T-1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Development  T-2: Transportation Demand Management Program
BACKGROUND:

In 2018, the La Mesa City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Vizion Zero plan to reduce traffic fatalities to zero in the City of La Mesa. In March 2025, the City launched the pilot La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program utilizing grant funds awarded by the Community Power Member Agency Grant Program. The City partnered with the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition (SDCBC) to provide safety education and 44 e-bike incentives were redeemed at a local bike shop, Stay True Cycleworks.

DISCUSSION:

In February 2026, Community Power opened the 2026 Community Clean Energy Grants Program to support projects and programs that create healthier, more sustainable communities in the San Diego Region. Grant funding is available in two tracks based on the work proposed, Track 1: Clean Energy Infrastructure and Track 2: Clean Energy Programming. Proposed projects or programs must align with one or more of the following focus areas: increased overall energy literacy, energy-focused educational programming that encourages clean energy use, particularly for youth, indoor and/or outdoor air quality improvement related to electrification, clean energy workforce development, ad improved energy resilience to ensure communities can avoid, prepare for, minimize, adapt to and recover from energy disruptions.

Staff evaluated the grant program criteria and recommends utilizing the funds to implement a second round of the La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program that supports CAP Measure T-1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Development and T-2: Transportation Demand Management Program. Like the pilot program launched in March 2025, the La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program will partner with SDCBC to provide community education classes such as bike rodeos, city cycling classes, and webinars and trainings. The E-Bike Incentive Program will use lessons learned from the 2025 program and will be developed to ensure equity considerations are incorporated in the program design. This proposed project is requesting the maximum funding amount of $50,000 in Track 2: Clean Energy Programming.

The La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program will promote biking as a main form of transportation for people who live and/or work in the City of La Mesa. The very successful

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
E-Bike voucher program to partially offset the purchase of an E-Bike will be continued.

Eligible applicants must be a resident or an employee of a business within the City of La Mesa, be 18 years of age or older, be limited to one voucher per household, and provide proof of residence or employment. Selection will be based on a scoring and random drawing system that is applied to all eligible applicants.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application to the San Diego Community Power Clean Energy Grant program to provide funding for the La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program and if awarded, accepting and appropriating funds for the project.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Hilary Ego
Environmental Sustainability Manager
Attachments: A: Resolution

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER 2026 COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY GRANT

PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE LA MESA E-BIKE INCENTIVE

PROGRAM AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS

FOR THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, in 2018 the La Mesa City Council adopted a Climate Action Plan and update in 2024 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that includes measures T-1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Development and T-2: Transportation Demand Management Program; WHEREAS, in 2025 the City of La Mesa launched the pilot La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program and offered free education and safety courses in partnership with the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition and distributed 44 e-bike vouchers that were redeemed at a local bike shop, Stay True Cycleworks;
WHEREAS, San Diego Community Power (Community Power) opened the 2026 Community Clean Energy Grants Program to support projects and programs that create healthier, more sustainable communities in the San Diego Region;
WHEREAS, the Community Power 2026 Community Clean Energy Grants Program has available grant funding for the La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to receive grant funding from Community Power to continue and expand the City’s existing bicycle infrastructure and safety programs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council that the City of La Mesa is authorized to submit a grant application for the following program to Community Power, which is referred to as:
 La Mesa E-Bike Incentive Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, if a grant award is made by Community Power, the City of La Mesa authorizes staff to accept the grant funds and execute the grant agreement(s).

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 24th day of February 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WEIGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WEIGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: February 24, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE APPROPRIATIONS

LIMIT (GANN SPENDING LIMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025 AND THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT

FACTORS USED TO CALCULATE THE LIMIT
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City council adopt the attached resolution to: 1) Establish the Appropriations Limit, also called the Gann Spending Limit for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025, and 2) Adopt the annual adjustment factors used to calculate the limit.

Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt a resolution pursuant to Propositions 4 and 111, establishing the Gann Spending Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, using the growth factor for new Non-Residential Construction in the City of La Mesa, and the change in population in San Diego County, as the annual adjustment factors used to compute the Appropriations Limit.

Fiscal Impact:

Adoption of the recommended action establishes the City’s annual appropriations limit as required by State law. This action does not increase actual expenditures or authorize new spending but sets the legal spending threshold for proceeds of taxes for the fiscal year.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: February 24, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.

BACKGROUND:

The Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) was passed on November 6, 1979 by the voters of California and became a constitutional amendment that limited the annual growth of State and local government budgets. The amendment established fiscal year 1978-79 as the base year and allowed the base amount to increase in future years by two factors: (1) the percentage change in population (city or county), and (2) the greater of the percentage change in the California Per Capita Personal Income (CPCI) index or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the City of La Mesa due to the addition of local nonresidential new construction. These annual adjustment factors were provided by the State Department of Finance and were used to calculate the Appropriations Limit for the City of La Mesa for each fiscal year through 1989-90.

DISCUSSION:

By resolution, the City Council must adopt the Gann Spending Limit based on the growth factors provided as follows:

1. Price Factor: Growth rate of 12.90%

2. Population Factor: Growth rate of 0.07%
The compounded growth factor used in fiscal year 2024-2025 is 1.1298% It should be noted that only appropriations financed from "Proceeds of Taxes" are subject to the Appropriations Limit. "Proceeds of Taxes" includes such revenue as property taxes, sales and use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, and interest earned on taxes. Revenues from other sources such as fees, charges, and Federal grants are considered "Nonproceeds of Taxes" and are not subject to the Appropriations Limit.

As detailed in Schedule A, the City of La Mesa's fiscal year 2024-2025 Appropriations Limit of $1.58 billion, is well above the amount subject to the limit of $56.3 million. The disparity between the City's Gann Spending Limit is due the City’s ability to contain costs well under the growth in spending allowed by Prop 4 and 111.

As required by SB 813, passed by the State Legislature in 1987, the Appropriations Limit and the "Appropriations Subject to the Limit" are to be included in the annual budget adopted by the City Council.