LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting of the City Council
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2026, 6:00 p.m.
Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:
Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
City Treasurer Matthew Strabone
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.gov), the City's YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/cityoflamesa) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:
The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:
Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1606535921
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 216-1590 or (669) 254-5252 Webinar ID: 160 653 5921 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor calls your name, step to the podium and state your name for the record. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.
Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however, any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
PLEASE NOTE: Public Comment will be limited to 3 minutes per item. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot be combined or yielded to another speaker. *Live Remote Public Comment ONLY permitted during Councilmember teleconferencing pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953 (AB 2449).
*Zoom Audio Comments: To provide oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the “Raise Hand” feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during non-agenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9. Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor closes public comment. •
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.
Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.
ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Human Resources Department 48 business hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].
Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo ID or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.
Pages
1. CALL TO ORDER
1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
3. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
4. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
5. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
6. PRESENTATIONS
6.1 CITY TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT 1
6.2 PROCLAIMING MAY AS POPPY MONTH
6.3 RECOGNITION OF 100 YEARS OF SERVICE BY AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY LA MESA UNIT 282
6.4 PROCLAIMING MAY 17-23, 2026 AS NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK
6.5 PROCLAIMING MAY AS OLDER AMERICANS MONTH
6.6 PROCLAIMING MAY AS BIKE MONTH
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.
If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.
8. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.4)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.
Recommended Motion:
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.4.
10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT
OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026
9 Recommended Motion:
Approve.
10.3 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (“HOME”)
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (JANUARY 2026 – MARCH 2026)
17 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file.
10.4 RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO D-MAX
ENGINEERING FOR DRY WEATHER AND MUNICIPAL SEPARATE
STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) OUTFALL AND PERSISTENT FLOW
MONITORING PROGRAM
32 Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
11. STAFF REPORTS
11.1 CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ARTWORK SELECTIONS
FOR THE ARTISTS TO WORK PUBLIC ART PROGRAM
40 Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:
Review and approve the artwork selections for the Artist to Work Public Art Program.
12. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING
12.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 6.11.200(M)(3) OF
THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE INTENT AND
AUTHORITY FOR CANNABIS DISPENSARIES TO USE THE PHRASE
“DISPENSARY” IN SIGNAGE CONTENT
85 Staff Reference: Ms. Santos
Recommended Motion:
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
12.2 ELECTRICAL BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM ORDINANCE 88
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA MESA ADDING CHAPTER 12.38 TO THE LA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE LA MESA ELECTRIC
BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21214.7, 312.5, AND 22651.08
Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
13. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
14. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
15. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
16. ADJOURNMENT
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending
March 31, 2026
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Finance Department – City Treasurer
SUMMARY
PORTFOLIO VALUE:
The City’s portfolio ended the quarter with a market value of $75,730,003. This represents a discount of $253,060 from par value, or purchase price. As the City maintains an Investment Policy that follows a strict “buy and hold” strategy, there is no economic gain or loss upon call or maturity. The City’s securities continue to earn interest at the stated rates through the dates of redemption.
LIQUIDITY:
Liquidity meets the statutory requirements with $39,594,064 in LAIF for immediate availability. “LAIF” stands for Local Agency Investment Fund, and is operated by the California State Treasurer to act as an immediate-access account for local governments and special districts in California.
EARNINGS:
Investment earnings from the invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit, but excluding LAIF, for the current quarter collected from January 1, 2026, through March 31, 2026, total $253,709, which represents an annualized rate of 2.79%. Investment earnings from LAIF for the current quarter total $401,560, which represents an annualized rate of 4.06%. Combined, investment earnings were $655,268, representing a total annualized rate of return of 3.45% for this quarter.
Please note that this represents interest payments and dividends actually earned by the City during the quarter, and may not necessarily reflect all interest payments and dividends payable to the City for the current quarter, nor be representative of future quarterly performance, due to differing payment schedules and variable interest rates.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 2 of 5
City’s Strategic Goal
To maintain a financially sound and affordable
city government
SAFETY
Federal Agencies
Carry the implied guarantee of the United States government Corporate Securities
The City’s Investment Policy requires ratings of Double A (AA) or better Certificates of Deposit
Guaranteed by the FDIC to $250,000
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Managed by the California State Treasurer; consists primarily of U.S. Treasuries, government agency bonds, and other short-term investments.
LIQUIDITY
The City’s LAIF balance of $39,594,964 represents the City’s immediate cash and is 52.1% of the portfolio. Additionally, as investments mature, they can be reinvested at then-current rates or redeemed to provide additional operating cash. The invested portfolio of government agency bonds, corporate securities, and certificates of deposit has an average maturity of 1 year and 5 months with $20,471,000 maturing within one year for added liquidity.
EARNINGS
As noted above, the City’s portfolio earned $655,268 this quarter, representing an annualized yield of 3.45%.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 3 of 5
PORTFOLIO PROFILE
To achieve the City’s strategic goal, the City’s primary investment objectives, in order of priority, are: Safety, Liquidity, and Earnings. Key to each of these objectives is a well-diversified portfolio that minimizes credit and interest rate risk and provides necessary liquidity. The City’s portfolio is designed to meet these objectives as summarized in the following table which is presented at par values. This table represents the City’s holdings as of March 31, 2026:
Years to
Maturity
Government
Agencies
Corporate
Securities
Certificates
of Deposit LAIF Totals %of Portfolio
Interest
Rate
0 – 1 17,000,000 0 3,471,000 39,594,064 60,065,064 79.05% 1.63%* 1 – 2 3,000,000 0 3,464,000 - 6,464,000 8.51% 3.44%
2 – 3 0 0 1,984,000 - 1,984,000 2.61% 4.51%
3 – 4 1,250,000 0 0 - 1,250,000 1.65% 4.16%
4 – 5 5,975,000 0 245,000 - 6,220,000 8.19% 4.18%
Totals 27,225,000 0 9,164,000 39,594,064 75,983,064
Portfolio % 35.83% 0% 12.06% 52.11% 100.00%
Interest
Rate 2.33% n/a 3.54% 3.98% 3.34%
*Interest rate for assets with 0-1 years to maturity excludes LAIF
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 4 of 5
PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
During the quarter, one certificate of deposit was purchased, six federal agency bonds were purchased, two corporate bonds matured, three federal agency bonds matured, and three federal agency bonds were called. No other holdings in the City’s portfolio matured, were called, or were purchased.
CDs Purchased: Maturity Rate Par Value
State Bank of India - NY 5 year 4.00% $245,000
Fed Agency Bonds Purchased: Maturity Rate Par Value
FHLB 5 year 4.02% $975,000
FHLMC 5 year 4.00% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 4.00% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 4.40% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 4.50% $1,000,000
FNMA 5 year 4.20% $1,000,000
Corporate Bonds Matured: Maturity Rate Par Value
JPMorgan Chase 5 year 0.70% $1,000,000
Apple 5 year 0.70% $1,000,000
Fed Agency Bonds Matured: Maturity Rate Par Value
FHLB 5 year 0.70% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 0.80% $1,000,000
FHLB 5 year 1.00% $1,000,000
Fed Agency Bonds Called: Maturity Rate Par Value
FAMC 3 year 4.98% $1,000,000
FHLB 3 year 4.90% $1,000,000
FNMA 3 year 4.75% $1,000,000
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 5 of 5
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE
The portfolio complies with California code sections concerning safety and liquidity in the investment of public funds. Investment strategies are based on liquidity requirements and interest rate projections and have been collaboratively determined by the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance. The City Treasurer executes trades in accordance with these strategies.
Required Contents of Investment Reports
California Government Code Section 53646(b) suggests that the quarterly investment report of a local agency contain certain items. These items include the type of investment, the issuer’s name, the date of maturity of the security, the par amount of the instrument, the market value, and the dollar amount invested in each security. The source of the market value also should be included in the report. The report also must reference all funds that are under the management of external investment providers, such as investment advisors and investment managers. A local government’s quarterly report, if submitted, must state the portfolio’s compliance with the agency’s investment policy or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance. Finally, the investment report must include a statement regarding the local agency’s ability to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months.
Accordingly, I advise you of the following facts in compliance with Government Code Section 53646(b):
1. The source of the valuations included herein is U.S. Bank, Saint Paul, MN 55107.
2. No funds are under the management of external providers or managers. Investment decisions are made by a consensus of the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Director of Finance.
3. The City’s portfolio remains in strict compliance with the Investment Policy of the City of La Mesa for FY 2025-2026.
4. The City of La Mesa’s investment portfolio more than adequately assures the City’s ability to meet its cash flow needs during the ensuing six months.
Reviewed by Respectfully submitted by
___________________________ ___________________________ Greg Humora Matt Strabone
City Manager City Treasurer
Attachments:
A - Schedule of Investments – Summary
B - Schedule of Investments – Detail
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments (Summary)
As of March 31, 2026
Issuer Type of Investment Maturity Date Par Value Book Value Market Value State of California LAIF 98-37-421 Demand 39,594,064 39,594,064 39,593,305 Federal Agencies U.S. Agency Obligations 05/2026 - 03/2031 27,225,000 27,223,500 26,971,697 Financial/Banking Institutions Certificates of Deposit 04/2026 - 02/2031 9,164,000 9,164,000 9,165,002 Corporate Obligations Medium Term Notes n/a - - -
Total 75,983,064 75,981,564 75,730,003
I certify that the investment of funds is in conformance with California Government Code section 53600. Those investments valued at below market cost will be held until maturity or until they can be sold without a loss. I also certify that the investment of funds provides the cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's estimated expenditure requirements.
Matt Strabone, City Treasurer
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, March 31, 2026
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 89235MKY6 TOYOTA FINL C D 0.900% 04/22/2021 04/22/2026 0.90% 248,000.00 248,000.00 247,541.20 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 02007GQQ9 ALLY BK UT C D 2.850% 05/02/2022 05/05/2026 2.85% 246,000.00 246,000.00 245,734.32 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 90348JQ29 UBS BK USA SALT C D 07/14/2021 07/14/2026 0.90% 249,000.00 249,000.00 246,866.07 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 30960QAS6 FARMERS INS C D 5.100% 07/26/2023 07/27/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,944.88 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 16141BAH4 CHARTWAY FED C D 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,071.36 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 68584JAG4 OREGON CMNTY CR C D 07/28/2023 07/28/2026 5.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,952.32 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 37424PAH7 GESA CR UN C D 5.250% 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.25% 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,125.92 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 67054NBL6 NUMERICA CR UN C D 07/31/2023 07/31/2026 5.20% 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,086.24 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 32022RSC2 FIRST FINL BK C D 3.250% 08/01/2022 08/03/2026 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,472.12 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 70962LAE2 PENTAGON C D 0.850% 09/01/2021 09/01/2026 0.85% 249,000.00 249,000.00 245,867.58 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 14042RQB0 CAPITAL ONE NATL C D 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 243,769.12 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 14042TDW4 CAPITAL ONE BANK C D 11/17/2021 11/17/2026 1.10% 248,000.00 248,000.00 243,769.12 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 07371CE88 BEAL BK USA C D 1.900% 02/23/2022 02/17/2027 1.90% 247,000.00 247,000.00 242,840.52 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 02589ABQ4 AMERICAN EXPRESS C D 03/09/2022 03/09/2027 2.00% 247,000.00 247,000.00 242,667.62 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 06740KPK7 BARCLAYS BK DEL C D 04/13/2022 04/13/2027 2.65% 246,000.00 246,000.00 242,915.16 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 58404DPC9 MEDALLION BK C D 3.200% 05/24/2022 05/24/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,070.25 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 20825WAX8 CONNEXUS CR UN C D 05/26/2022 05/26/2027 3.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 246,823.74 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 90352RCN3 USALLIANCE FCU C D 05/31/2022 05/28/2027 3.30% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,356.60 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 50625LBN2 LAFAYETTE FED C D 3.250% 06/15/2022 06/15/2027 3.25% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,117.56 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 88413QDL9 THIRD FED SVGS C D 3.500% 06/28/2022 06/28/2027 3.50% 245,000.00 245,000.00 243,806.85 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 254673L38 DISCOVER BK C D 3.400% 07/06/2022 07/06/2027 3.40% 245,000.00 245,000.00 243,510.40 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 32026UU20 FIRST FNDTN BK C D 4.600% 07/19/2023 07/19/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 246,156.96 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 307811EM7 FARMERS C D 3.200% 08/05/2022 08/05/2027 3.20% 249,000.00 249,000.00 246,741.57 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 08016PEH8 BELMONT BK TR C D 08/24/2022 08/24/2027 3.15% 249,000.00 249,000.00 246,482.61 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 19075JAB4 COBALT FED CR C D 3.600% 09/15/2022 09/15/2027 3.60% 249,000.00 249,000.00 247,986.57 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 052392BT3 AUSTIN TELCO C D 3.800% 09/21/2022 09/21/2027 3.80% 249,000.00 249,000.00 248,661.36 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 87164YT95 SYNCHRONY C D 4.600% 10/28/2022 10/28/2027 4.60% 244,000.00 244,000.00 246,559.56 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 25460FDW3 DIRECT FED CR C D 4.800% 11/07/2022 11/08/2027 4.80% 248,000.00 248,000.00 251,506.72 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 61690U5K2 MORGAN STANLEY C D 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.45% 244,000.00 244,000.00 246,630.32 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 804767AB7 SAVANNAH BK C D 4.100% 05/03/2023 05/03/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,968.61 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 91527PBW6 UNIVEST NATL BK C D 05/05/2023 05/05/2028 4.10% 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,971.10 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 92834ABT2 VISIONBANK ST C D 4.050% 05/12/2023 05/12/2028 4.05% 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,722.10 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 05765LBU0 BALBOA THRIFT C D 4.400% 07/19/2023 07/19/2028 4.40% 249,000.00 249,000.00 256,248.39 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 89854LAD5 TTCU FED CR UN C D 5.000% 07/26/2023 07/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 253,954.48 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 898812AC6 TUCSON FED CR C D 5.000% 09/08/2023 09/08/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 254,209.92 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 39573LEM6 GREENSTATE CR UN C D 09/26/2023 09/26/2028 5.00% 248,000.00 248,000.00 254,319.04 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 856288EF8 STATE BK INDIA C D 4.000% 02/12/2026 02/12/2031 4.00% 245,000.00 245,000.00 244,573.70 Subtotal: 9,164,000.00 9,164,000.00 9,165,001.96
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value US AGENCIES 3130AMDY5 F H L B DEB 1.000% 05/20/2021 05/20/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,090.00
City of La Mesa
Schedule of Investments, March 31, 2026
US AGENCIES 3133EMH21 F F C B DEB 0.900% 06/12/2021 06/15/2026 0.90% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 994,140.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMPT3 F H L B DEB 1.030% 06/23/2021 06/23/2026 1.03% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,810.00 US AGENCIES 3130AMWX6 F H L B DEB 1.020% 06/30/2021 06/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,520.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANHW3 F H L B DEB 0.930% 07/29/2021 08/25/2026 0.93% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 988,760.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANSB7 F H L B DEB 1.000% 09/17/2021 09/17/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,360.00 US AGENCIES 3130ANYR5 F H L B DEB 0.950% 09/30/2021 09/30/2026 0.95% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 986,340.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6M2 F H L B DEB 1.020% 09/30/2021 09/30/2026 1.02% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 986,680.00 US AGENCIES 3130APB87 F H L B DEB 1.100% 10/13/2021 10/13/2026 1.10% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 985,930.00 US AGENCIES 3130AP6U4 F H L B DEB 1.000% 10/14/2021 10/14/2026 1.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 984,820.00 US AGENCIES 3130APDQ5 F H L B DEB 1.250% 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.25% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 985,640.00 US AGENCIES 3130APL78 F H L B DEB 1.375% 10/28/2021 10/28/2026 1.38% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 986,550.00 US AGENCIES 3130APQA6 F H L B DEB 1.400% 11/24/2021 11/24/2026 1.40% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 985,170.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQUD3 F H L B DEB 2.010% 02/25/2022 02/25/2027 2.01% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 984,340.00 US AGENCIES 3130AQZ55 F H L B DEB 2.500% 03/10/2022 03/10/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 988,290.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARAH4 F H L B DEB 2.350% 03/04/2022 03/29/2027 2.35% 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 986,040.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARDY4 F H L B DEB 2.500% 03/29/2022 03/29/2027 2.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 987,810.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARGE5 F H L B DEB 3.000% 04/21/2022 04/21/2027 3.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 990,840.00 US AGENCIES 3130ARW56 F H L B DEB 3.650% 05/12/2022 05/12/2027 3.65% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 995,630.00 US AGENCIES 3130AS7J2 F H L B DEB 3.200% 06/10/2022 06/10/2027 3.20% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 993,230.00 US AGENCIES 3135GAU25 F N M A DEB 4.375% 08/06/2024 08/06/2029 4.38% 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,055.00 US AGENCIES 3130B2K95 F H L B DEB 4.100% 08/30/2024 08/28/2029 4.10% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 995,690.00 US AGENCIES 3130B9DE7 F H L B DEB 4.020% 02/11/2026 02/11/2031 4.02% 975,000.00 975,000.00 965,181.75 US AGENCIES 3134HCUD9 F H L M C M T N 4.000% 02/26/2026 02/26/2031 4.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 982,360.00 US AGENCIES 3130B9WS5 F H L B DEB 4.000% 03/17/2026 03/17/2031 4.00% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 997,380.00 US AGENCIES 3130B9ZK9 F H L B DEB 4.400% 03/26/2026 03/18/2031 4.40% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,280.00 US AGENCIES 3130B9ZM5 F H L B DEB 4.500% 03/30/2026 03/25/2031 4.50% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,430.00 US AGENCIES 3136GCWV3 F N M A 4.200% 03/27/2026 03/27/2031 4.20% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 999,330.00 Subtotal: 27,225,000.00 27,223,500.00 26,971,696.75
Type of Investment CUSIP Id Asset Short Name Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Par Value Book Value Market Value Demand 98-37-421 LAIF State of California 3.98% 39,594,063.68 39,594,063.68 39,593,304.70 Grand Total: 75,983,063.68 75,981,563.68 75,730,003.41
1 La Mesa City Council
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Location:
April 28, 2026, 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Present: Vice Mayor Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Councilmember Genevieve Suzuki
Absent: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items may be taken out of order during the meeting.
The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.
Vice Mayor Cazares called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
1.1 INVOCATION - VICE MAYOR CAZARES
1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.
3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Vice Mayor, Council, and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.
2 4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.
5. PRESENTATIONS
5.1 PROCLAIMING MAY 15, 2026 AS PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY Vice Mayor Cazares read and presented the proclamation proclaiming May 15, 2026, as Law Enforcement Officers' Memorial Day to the La Mesa Police Department.
5.2 PROCLAIMING MAY AS WATER SAFETY MONTH
Vice Mayor Cazares read the proclamation proclaiming the month of May as Water Safety Month.
5.3 SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY POWER PRESENTATION ON 2026 RATES,
POWER PROCUREMENT, AND PROGRAM OFFERINGS
Karen Burns, Chief Executive Officer, San Diego Community Power ("SDCP"), provided an overview of SDCP’s role in delivering cleaner, competitively priced energy and outlined its renewable energy goals, customer program options, and high participation rates in La Mesa. She highlighted local impacts, including renewable energy adoption, incentives, community partnerships, and infrastructure investments supporting sustainability efforts. She also discussed future initiatives focused on local energy development, affordability, and expanded clean energy programs.
Council questions and comments ensued.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Debbie Eyler raised concerns regarding street maintenance and traffic conditions on Glen Street.
7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments on Consent Calendar items.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 9.1 through 9.4)
3 *If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 9.4).
Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
Approve Consent Calendar Items 9.1 through 9.4.
For (3): Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (3 to 0)
9.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.
9.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026
Approve.
9.3 RESOLUTION AWARDING AGREEMENTS TO A DEBT FINANCING
TEAM CONSISTING OF URBAN FUTURES, INC., BEST BEST &
KRIEGER LLP, AND OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC. FOR POTENTIAL
PROPOSITION D BOND REFINANCING AND PROPERTY TAX
SAVINGS
Resolution No. 2026-045
Adopt Resolution.
9.4 *SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) ANNUAL
ADJUSTMENT TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTCIP) DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SANDAG ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT TO
THE RTCIP DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SANDAG COMMISSION ORDINANCE 04-01 AND
TRANSNET EXTENSION ORDINANCE AND EXPENDITURE PLAN
Resolution No. 2026-046
4 Adopt Resolution.
10. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING
10.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 6.11.200(M)(3) OF THE
LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE INTENT AND
AUTHORITY FOR CANNABIS DISPENSARIES TO USE THE PHRASE
"DISPENSARY" IN SIGNAGE CONTENT
City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.
Director of Community Development Santos presented the proposed ordinance amending Section 6.11.200(M)(3) of the La Mesa Municipal Code to clarify that cannabis dispensaries may use the phrase “dispensary” in signage content. She explained the amendment was intended to reduce confusion about the nature of cannabis businesses and noted there would be no direct fiscal impact associated with the item.
Council questions and comments ensued.
Moved By Vice Mayor Cazares
Seconded By Councilmember Suzuki
Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.
For (3): Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (3 to 0)
11. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING
11.1 ELECTRICAL BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM ORDINANCE
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA MESA ADDING CHAPTER 12.38 TO THE LA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE LA MESA ELECTRIC
BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21214.7, 312.5, AND 22651.08
City Attorney Sabine read the title of the ordinance.
5 The following members of the public spoke or submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed Electrical Bicycle Safety Pilot Program Ordinance:
Andrea Cryer
Joseph Cryer
Cassi Knight
Chris Jack
Council questions and comments ensued.
Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Vice Mayor Cazares
To continue the item to a date certain of May 12, 2026, to allow consideration by the full Council.
For (2): Vice Mayor Cazares, and Councilmember Suzuki
Against (1): Councilmember Lothian
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (2 to 1)
12. HEARINGS
12.1 CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 AND A
SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2025 ANNUAL
ACTION PLAN
Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice.
Vice Mayor Cazares opened the hearing for Item 12.1.
Senior Management Analyst Pina presented the CDBG Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Annual Action Plan, outlining proposed funding allocations to support infrastructure improvements, public services, and program administration in alignment with the City’s Consolidated Plan goals. She also described a proposed amendment to the FY 2025 Action Plan to reallocate funds from
6 the Nancy Drive project, which cannot be completed within the program year, to sidewalk improvement projects.
Council questions and comments ensued.
Moved By Vice Mayor Cazares
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
Close the hearing.
For (3): Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (3 to 0)
Moved By Vice Mayor Cazares
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
Direct staff to draft and circulate for public review the CDBG FY 2027 Annual Action Plan and the FY 2025 Annual Action Plan with the proposed amendment and return to Council on May 26, 2026, for final review and approval.
For (3): Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (3 to 0)
13. COUNCIL INITIATED
13.1 CITY SPONSORSHIP FOR MINI MESA CIVIC LAB
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CITY SPONSORSHIP FOR MINI
MESA: CIVIC LAB, INCLUDING AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF CITY FACILITIES; STAFF SUPPORT FOR PLANNING AND ON-SITE
COORDINATION; DEMONSTRATIONS AND EVENT STAFFING BY
THE LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND HEARTLAND FIRE; AND
EVENT PROMOTION THROUGH CITY COMMUNICATION CHANNELS
AND PARTNER OUTREACH - COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI
Councilmember Suzuki introduced Mini Mesa: Civic Lab, a proposed oneday, City-sponsored civic education event for students in grades 4–8
7 designed to promote civic literacy through hands-on activities, demonstrations, and career exploration with local agencies. The program would involve partnerships with organizations such as Helix Water District, San Diego Community Power, and the La Mesa Police and Fire Departments, with City staff coordinating logistics and outreach.
Dawn Tol spoke in support of approving City sponsorship of Mini Mesa:
Civic Lab.
Moved By Councilmember Suzuki
Seconded By Vice Mayor Cazares
Approve City sponsorship of Mini Mesa: Civic Lab, including authorization for use of City facilities; staff support for planning and on-site coordination; participation by the La Mesa Police Department and Heartland Fire & Rescue for demonstrations and event staffing; and promotion through City communication channels and partner outreach; and direct staff to finalize event logistics, secure partner commitments, and return to Council with a proposed date, location, and budget for consideration and approval.
For (3): Vice Mayor Cazares, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Suzuki
Absent (2): Mayor Arapostathis, and Councilmember Dillard Approved (3 to 0)
14. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Vice Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions, and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.
15. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
There were no reports.
16. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Cazares adjourned the meeting at 7:18 p.m.
_________________________
8 City Clerk
DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOME 1st Quarter Report 2026
Please see the attached 1st Quarter Report.
City of La Mesa
Homeless Outreach &
Mobile Engagement (HOME) Program
Quarterly Report: January – March 2026
HOME Program Overview
The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) Team is an initiative of the City of La Mesa and the La Mesa Police Department (LMPD). The HOME Team provides a housing-first and traumainformed approach to addressing homelessness in La Mesa. The HOME Team utilizes progressive engagement and harm reduction to assist individuals who are unable to access homeless services on their own. This report breaks down the the HOME Team efforts and successes during the 1st quarter of 2026.
Since the beginning of the quarter, the HOME program outreach specialists have:
• Contacted 156 total individuals experiencing homelessness and newly enrolled 114 adults and 21 children. Many of these newly enrolled adults are one-time contacts that were provided shortterm services as they passed through La Mesa. A total of 48 individuals contacted this quarter were connected to a temporary or permanent home.
• Responded to 638 service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and as follow-ups to previous contacts. Historically, many of these calls would have been handled by city emergency response services and law enforcement. • Prioritized the most vulnerable individuals in the City of La Mesa, including individuals living on the street with chronic physical and mental health conditions, households with children, and individuals facing chronic homelessness.
Clients Served
The HOME Team operates out of LMPD headquarters in downtown La Mesa and responds to nonemergency calls for service related to homelessness that are generated through police dispatch, HOME email, and The HOME Hotline. Each of these calls is first attended by a HOME Team outreach specialist; PD or PERT officers are only requested for rare cases involving legal or safety concerns. 114
42 Total Number of Clients Served
New Clients in Quarter Continuing Clients
156
Instances of
Service*
386
Calls for
Service
683
HOME Team Assistance: 28
# of Calls LMPD Officers
requested HOME assistance
# of Calls the HOME team
requested:
Officer Assistance: 8
PERT Assistance: 0
*Instances of service are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service.
Client Demographics and Household Composition
Single Person
Households
79 Adult Couple
Households
10 12
71 85
60 75
90 Female Male
33 12
20 15
36 21
19 0 to 17 18 to 24
25 to 34 35 to 44
45 to 54 55 to 64
65 or Above Unknown
Total Clients Served Demographics
Chronically
Homeless
57% Households
with Children
86
Housing Outcomes
35 households (58 people) exited the HOME program to a shelter, temporary placement, institutional setting or permanent placement during the quarter. 7 households (18 persons) exited to Emergency shelter, including hotel or motel paid for with emergency shelter voucher, Host Home shelter, and traditional emergency shelter.
5 households (8 persons) exited to temporary living situation including transitional housing or staying with friends and/ or family. 2 households (2 persons) exited to an institutional setting including detox/ substance use rehabilitation program, jail/ prison, or a long-term care facility/ nursing home.
21 households (30 people) exited to permanent housing, defined as a leased unit meeting United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) occupancy standards with or without supportive services, such as mental health counseling.
16 housing matches were provided through the Coordinated Entry System
Housing Matches
Housing matches provided through the Coordinated Entry System (CES) are an essential part of people attempting to access permanent housing. In short, a housing match is when a person is connected to a housing provider for assistance in the form of a subsidized room or ongoing rental assistance. Once a person has been matched through CES, the HOME Team does their best to help a client connect with the housing provider to complete the housing process. During this quarter, the HOME Team clients received 16 housing matches.
Client Services
The HOME Team continues to excel in helping clients navigate and connect with a variety of existing services within the community. Some of these services include ongoing nutritional, medical, and financial support through programs such as Cal-Fresh, Medical, and General Relief.
The HOME Team was able to connect multiple people with these services by transporting and supporting these clients in navigating these services at the Family Resource Centers located in Lemon Grove and El Cajon.
The HOME Team continues to provide housing navigation throughout this quarter. Housing Navigation aids individuals who have an income, housing voucher, or rental assistance subsidies that could support a rental unit on an ongoing basis. The HOME Team Housing Navigator works with these clients to identify suitable units, pay for application fees, advocate to landlords, and provide financial assistance to cover the move-in costs related to the rental unit.
The HOME Team also continues to assist with acquiring identifying documentation. Almost all of the clients who successfully exited the program during this quarter worked with the HOME Team to acquire both State Identification cards and/ or Social Security Cards; attaining these documents was a necessity for their housing placements.
The HOME Team continues to work closely with a non-profit: 2nd Chance. This non-profit provides a Job Readiness Training (JRT) course for clients who struggle with connecting to employment due to their homelessness status and/or involvement with the justice system. As part of the JRT, the participants are provided with professional interview attire. During the last week of JRT, the participants take part in a round of interviews with potential employers including but not limited to Western Towing, ACE Parking, and Sycuan Casino.
Having consistent access to a van continues to be an important resource for clients. During the quarter, the HOME Team utilized the van to view units for rent in El Cajon, Downtown San Diego, and San Diego County. Being able to go to units quickly and with little notice has resulted in clients being able to successfully exit our program into rental assistance programs. The HOME Team has also utilized this van to clear encampments by taking clients and their belongings to storage, housing opportunities, or alternative camping locations. Most importantly, this van is accessible to people that have disabilities or are experiencing mobility issues.
During this quarter, the HOME Team provided some form of financial and/or basic-needs assistance to all enrolled clients with the dual objectives of moving them toward a housing outcome and keeping them safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. These objectives have not changed throughout this quarter.
All clients received COVID-19-related services, including updates related to local public-health guidelines, vaccine information, hygiene supplies, and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as face masks and hand sanitizer.
All clients received food, water, or other nutrition services, with approximately 60 prioritized for on-going meal support.
2 people were connected to ongoing family nutrition assistance HOME program staff distributed $46,848.89 in direct financial assistance, including vehicle repair, and funds used to secure new rental units. 2 households received accommodation in a motel, designed to provide shortterm bridge shelter for those with a concrete housing plan.
HOME program staff arranged 68 rides to apartment viewings, shelter stays, program intake interviews, and other critical appointments via ridesharing service.
10 Clients were connected to ongoing physical, mental, and/or behavioral healthcare.
10 Instances of clients connected to CA ID, Birth Certificate, and/ or Social Security Card.
8 Instances of clients connected to Cal Fresh and/ or Medi-Cal. 0 of clients connected to Serving Seniors.
4 Instances of people enrolled into employment training and support 7 people contacted by HOME became homeless for the first time this quarter.
2 people were connected to legal support services.
Ongoing Care
Throughout the life of the program, HOME has noticed that the majority of calls related to someone experiencing homelessness were generated because of another community member’s concern for a person’s mental, physical, or behavioral health. Because of this, the HOME Team has prioritized connecting people to ongoing healthcare through organizations such as Family Health Centers, East County Behavioral Health, Jane Westin, Alvarado Parkway Institute, McAlister, Peoples Advocacy Voices & Education. and Volunteers in Medicine. All these organizations provide low to no-cost services to people experiencing homelessness. Connecting people to ongoing and preventative care such as what is being offered at these organizations is essential to addressing issues that invariably result in emergent health situations for people experiencing homelessness. These situations result in overburdened emergency rooms, ambulances, and other emergency services. Additionally, due to the limited nature of HOME services provided to a person after they are housed, having connections to ongoing community support is an important part of someone maintaining housing stability.
Calls for Service
The HOME Team responded to 638 calls for service during the quarter. This number includes service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and follow-ups to previous contacts.
Of these calls for service, 63 calls were new requests for assistance related to homelessness in the City. Historically, these calls would have been addressed by city emergency response services and law enforcement.
Of these calls, 30 were direct responses to calls to the HOME hotline and email requests made by community members regarding someone experiencing homelessness.
Additionally, 340 calls were service-driven appointments with clients or proactive rapport-building contacts, in support of the HOME Team’s mission.
During the entirety of this quarter, the HOME Team was connected to the La Mesa Police Department’s dispatch center via police radio. Starting the 4th quarter of 2021, the HOME Team has been able to realize the benefits of the technology and partnerships with call-takers through decreased response times to current calls for service, improved support to police officers, enhanced understanding of the program workload and service provision through data tracking, and improved safety of the HOME Team members and the community.
Hotel Utilization
The HOME Team provided bridge housing in the form of a motel stay to 2 households during the quarter. One of the households consisted of a single woman who is a Transition Age Youth and was living in their vehicle. This person was connected to HOME after their car was struck by someone who ran a red light. HOME was able to connect this person with a local shelter that, specifically, served
people in the TAY age range, but the person was not going to be able to get an intake until 10AM the next day, so HOME was able to put this person in a hotel for the night until their intake. The other household that utilized bridge housing during the quarter consisted of a mother and teenage son. This household was able to secure a lease towards the end of February, but the move-in was not scheduled until the first of next month, so HOME was able to put this family in a hotel until the start of their lease.
This service is a crucial benefit for people that have a scheduled move-in or intake date. This bridge housing assists in allowing the client to keep their phones charged, meet regularly with HOME & HOME Housing Navigator, and present at lease signing/ final walkthrough as clean, showered, and presentable.
Client success stories
In February of 2026, the HOME Team met a woman who was living in her car with her teenage son.
This person reported to the HOME Team that this was their first experience of homelessness. This woman was previously renting an apartment in La Mesa, but they were forced to move out of their unit after continuous rent increases were combined with sporadic & part-time employment opportunities after being laid off from their job.
The HOME Team spoke with this person about various housing options throughout the county as well as the possibility and benefits of shared housing. After this conversation, the client was able to identify someone who was working full-time and could be a potential roommate. Despite this potential roommate’s employment, they also could not afford a unit with their sole income. This client and their roommate worked closely with the HOME housing navigator to identify a place within their budget.
After identifying a place, the HOME housing navigator communicated with the landlord to get all the necessary paperwork signed and submitted. This client, their son, and their roommate move into their unit with HOME assistance. This client was housed quickly due to their own hard work as well as being open to taking advantage of the benefits of shared housing. The current economic climate does not allow many people to acquire & sustain rental units with one income. With that in mind, the HOME Team has been encouraging all clients to think about shared housing and who in their network can be suitable roommates.
In April of 2021, the HOME team encountered an individual who was living in his car. He reported that he had been experiencing homelessness since 2009 and had been staying in his car during this time.
Using a progressive engagement model, the HOME team-built rapport and trust with the individual through consistent and meaningful interactions. Although he had been experiencing homelessness for over a decade, he had never been connected to long-term services that could provide the support and motivation he needed. At the time of enrollment, the client had a limited income of approximately $800 per month, making it impossible to afford housing within the local rental market.
Through ongoing conversations, the client shared that he had previously worked for a company and believed that he was entitled to a pension, but he did not know how to access it. With the HOME team’s assistance and the individual’s patience, the HOME team was able to help guide the client through all the steps necessary to obtain his pension. This process took over a year to complete. Even after obtaining this additional income, housing remained out of reach, as the client prioritized maintaining his vehicle, including keeping up with registration, necessary repairs and living expenses. Like many other individuals facing prolonged homelessness, there were times when he was discouraged, particularly as he encountered barriers to accessing available housing resources in the county. However, through continued outreach, motivational interviewing and HOME Team’s commitment to the progressive engagement model, the HOME team was able to reconnect with him and re-establish a positive working relationship.
In 2024, the client made the decision to prioritize housing as a significant goal. In 2025, he was randomly selected to receive a Permanent supportive Housing Voucher which allowed him to attain a unit for 30% of his income while supporting his long-term housing stability. The process of securing housing was not without challenges. Having not rented a home or held a lease in 19 years, the client experienced uncertainty and self-doubt throughout the process. Despite this, and despite years of limited trust in service providers, he remained engaged and committed to completing the required orientations and documentation. With continued encouragement from the HOME team and support from property management, the client began to envision a new chapter of his life, living indoors in a place of his own, alongside his 8-month-old puppy, Chucky.
On January 14, 2026, the client successfully moved into his new home. During a follow-up two months later, the client reflected on his journey and shared that there were moments when he felt like giving up, not out of a lack of gratitude, but because adjusting to this new way of living felt unfamiliar and, at times, overwhelming. However, with each passing day, he discovered new comforts and simple joys within his home, things that many take for granted, but which represented stability, safety, and hope for him. Today, he continues to adjust and grow in his new environment, building a life that once felt out of reach. His journey is a testament to resilience, patience, and the impact of consistent, compassionate support.
Community Support Partnerships
• Journey Community Church continues to provide any and all food items to the HOME Program, allowing HOME staff to feed up to 60 people per week
• La Mesa Village Association
• La Mesa Thrift Shop
• La Mesa First United Methodist Church
• Empire Thrift Store of El Cajon
• Eagle Scouts
Community Resource Partnerships
• Home-Start, Inc.
• East County Behavioral Health
• Center Star ACT
• McAlister Inc.
• La Mesa – Spring Valley School District Social Workers • East County Homeless Task Force
• San Diego County Mental Health
• HOME staff have developed a word-of-mouth network of donors and residents and regularly interface with anyone interested in helping those facing hardship on the streets of La Mesa. • Assisted Replacement Medication Therapy Medical Specialists • The Lodge of La Mesa (Transition Age Youth)
• Borrego Health-Centro Medico El Cajon
• New Found Homes ILF
• Mission Academy
• 2nd Chance
• Alvarado Parkway Institute
• Bayview Crisis Stabilization Unit
• Volunteers in Medicine
• Serving Seniors
HOME Program Historical Statistics
Client Enrollment
Quarter
Total
Clients
Served
New
Clients
Continuing
Clients
Q4 2020 56 n/a n/a
Q1 2021 108 61 47
Q2 2021 75 44 31
Q3 2021 86 44 31
Q4 2021 25 10 15
Q1 2022 69 48 21
Q2 2022 96 62 34
Q3 2022 73 38 35
Q4 2022 108 65 43
Q1 2023 71 28 43
Q2 2023 72 53 19
Q3 2023 71 43 28
Q4 2023 56 27 29
Q1 2024 43 29 14
Q2 2024 40 21 19
Q3 2024 39 24 15
Q4 2024 57 40 17
Q1 2025 95 24 71
Q2 2025 174 120 54
Q3 2025 172 98 74
Q4 2025 137 78 59
Q1 2026 156 114 42
Grand
Total 1879 1071 741
Calls for Service
1 Instances of servic
Quarter Instances of
Service1 Calls for Service
Calls Officers
requested
HOME
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested
Officer
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested
PERT
assistance
Q4 2020 191 110 --- 1 1
Q1 2021 397 187 --- 0 1
Q2 2021 349 355 --- 0 0
Q3 2021 393 134 --- 0 0
Q4 2021 237 81 --- 0 0
Q1 2022 373 617 24 10 0
Q2 2022 626 657 11 22 4
Q3 2022 584 549 26 5 1
Q4 2022 744 417 16 3 0
Q1 2023 633 435 19 7 0
Q2 2023 494 384 16 2 0
Q3 2023 173 447 12 3 0
Q4 2023 274 391 24 3 0
Q1 2024 273 443 19 2 0
Q2 2024 261 473 13 9 0
Q3 2024 244 463 23 12 0
Q4 2024 358 448 10 5 0
Q1 2025 476 465 11 5 1
Q2 2025 358 631 16 7 0
Q3 2025 381 680 43 5 0
Q4 2025 349 505 41 5 1
Q1 2026 386 638 28 8 0
Grand Total 8554 9510 352 114 9
e are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service.
Services and Housing
Quarter HOME
Rides
Direct Financial
Assistance
Clients
who
Received
Motel
Vouchers
Clients
Permanently
Housed
Households
Permanently
Housed
Clients
Temporarily
Housed
Households
Temporarily
Housed
Q4 2020 18 $ 3,357.00 7 5 --- 3 ---
Q1 2021 16 $ 10,506.00 7 --- 4 --- 19
Q2 2021 7 $ 4,967.00 9 8 7 --- 5
Q3 2021 144 $ 16,623.42 7 8 3 --- 5
Q4 2021 84 $ 1,071.40 0 12 11 --- 4
Q1 2022 92 $ 6,579.56 5 10 9 6 6
Q2 2022 96 $ 3,727.96 2 16 11 5 3
Q3 2022 68 $ 3,445.75 3 8 6 4 4
Q4 2022 69 $ 3,411.55 3 15 6 2 2
Q1 2023 56 $ 2,210.47 2 17 7 2 2
Q2 2023 59 $ 2,581.44 0 4 2 5 5
Q3 2023 59 $ 7,560.47 2 2 2 6 6
Q4 2023 91 $ 1,344.96 1 10 8 1 1
Q1 2024 52 $ 3,506.91 1 7 6 1 7
Q2 2024 86 $ 8,428.53 0 9 4 5 5
Q3 2024 61 $ 20,935.20 1 4 2 2 2
Q4 2024 56 $ 8,895.15 1 7 7 2 2
Q1 2025 79 $ 10,007.91 0 15 6 3 8
Q2 2025 138 $ 8,895.15 0 7 7 9 9
Q3 2025 129 $ 43,306.39 4 40 24 17 13
Q4 2025 69 $ 32,338.40 0 32 20 13 8
Q1 2026 81 46,848,89 2 30 21 28 14
Grand
Total 1610 $ 203,700.62 57 266 173 114 130
Total People
Housed 380
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO D-MAX
ENGINEERING FOR DRY WEATHER AND MUNICIPAL
SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) OUTFALL
AND PERSISTENT FLOW MONITORING PROGRAM
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Recommendation:
That the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a task order to D-MAX Engineering, Inc. for the Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring and Persistent Flow Program.
Fiscal Impact:
This task order totals $85,706 and is available in the Wastewater Engineering Operating Budget Account 4141-6450.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
BACKGROUND:
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for storm water discharge requires the City of La Mesa to implement a Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring and Persistent Flow Sampling Program. The intent of this program is to provide lab and field analysis, flow measurement, observations, and trash assessment at selected storm drain outfalls around the City. The work also includes a required written report, data assessment, and analysis to compare to past years' data.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 2 of 2
Two times per monitoring year (October 1 through September 30), the City assesses at least 80 percent of its major MS4 outfalls. The City has 24 major outfalls for a total of 40 visits. Also, 5 outfalls that are persistently flowing are tested twice each year for pH, conductivity, temperature, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen.
In May 2024, the City advertised a request for qualifications (RFQ 25-01) and conducted a formal selection process to choose highly qualified firms that could provide various services. D-MAX Engineering, Inc. was one of the consultants selected to enter into a master agreement that allows for the issuance of task orders to authorize specific items of work on an as-needed basis for the selected consultants.
DISCUSSION:
D-MAX Engineering, Inc., is the current on-call consultant for storm water pollution prevention services and is very familiar with La Mesa’s drainage system. D-MAX Engineering, Inc. has provided La Mesa with excellent and cost competitive services for field monitoring programs and monitoring reports.
The proposed fee for the MS4 Outfall Monitoring Program is $85,706 (Attachment B) and includes follow-up work, source determinations, and action to respond to and address regulatory requests pertaining to storm water sampling and monitoring CONCLUSION:
Given the service provided by D-MAX Engineering, Inc., staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution authorizing a task order to D-MAX Engineering, Inc., for the Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring and Persistent Flow Program.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. D-MAX Engineering task order cost proposal
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO D-MAX ENGINEERING FOR DRY WEATHER AND MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) OUTFALL AND
PERSISTENT FLOW MONITORING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has a strategic goal to promote a high quality of life that current and future residents can afford to call home;
WHEREAS, the City is required by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board to annually implement a Dry Weather Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Outfall Monitoring and Persistent Flow Program;
WHEREAS, the intent of this program is to provide lab and field analysis, observations, and trash assessment at selected storm drain outfalls around the City; and WHEREAS, in 2024, D-MAX Engineering was selected per Request for Qualifications No. 25-01 to provide professional engineering services for storm water pollution prevention and field monitoring services and subsequently has provided professional and cost-competitive services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of the City a task order between the City of La Mesa and D-MAX Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $85,706 for the Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring and Persistent Flow Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 12
th day of May 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026-___, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
D-MAX Engineering, Inc.
Consultants in Water & Environmental Sciences
5440 Morehouse Drive Suite 4500 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 352-6816 Fax (858) 352-6817 March 19, 2026
Mr. Joe Kuhn
Environmental Manager
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91944-0937
Re: Proposal for Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring for the 2025-2026 Monitoring Year
Dear Mr. Kuhn:
D-MAX Engineering, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the City of La Mesa (City) stormwater program with monitoring tasks required by San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by Order Nos. R9-2015- 0001 and R9-2015-0100 (Municipal Permit) for the 2025-2026 monitoring year.
Scope of Services
The scope of services for major tasks to be completed are described below.
I. Dry Weather Major MS4 Outfall Discharge Monitoring and Reporting The Municipal Permit requires the City to perform Dry Weather Major MS4 Outfall Discharge Monitoring each monitoring year (October 1 through September 30). The City is required to visit at least 80 percent of its major MS4 outfalls within each Watershed Management Area (WMA) twice per monitoring year. The City has 18 major MS4 outfalls (14 within the San Diego River WMA and 4 within the San Diego Bay WMA), which equates to a total of 32 required site visits (24 in San Diego River and 8 in San Diego Bay).
The field work will include performing flow measurements, collecting visual observations, conducting trash assessments, and performing discharge source investigations. In cases where outfalls are inaccessible, upstream proxy sites are used as a replacement. Data will be recorded such that relevant parameters can be reported in the regional standard format for delivery to the watershed groups.
A summary report will be provided to the City upon completion of the program, which will include an updated inventory of monitoring sites, results in tabular form, and recommendations based on monitoring results. The summary report will also include a map of monitoring locations and monitoring site photos as attachments. A spreadsheet of relevant data in regional data sharing format will be provided along with the report.
II. Non-Stormwater Persistent Flow Sampling
In accordance with Section D.2.b. of the Municipal Permit, the City is required to perform nonstormwater persistent flow MS4 outfall discharge monitoring. In each WMA, the “highest priority” persistently flowing (HPPF) outfalls are selected for lab sampling. Based on results from last year’s monitoring program, the numbers of highest priority outfalls in each watershed are as follows:
• San Diego River (Alvarado): 5
• San Diego Bay (University): 2
ATTACHMENT B
Mr. Joe Kuhn
March 19, 2026
5440 Morehouse Dive Suite 4500 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 352-6816 Fax (858)352-6817 As required by the Municipal Permit, we will visit each highest-priority persistently flowing outfall twice during the monitoring year and collect samples when measurable flow is present. During each visit with sufficient flow, the following will occur:
• Field tests will be completed for pH, temperature, conductivity, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen using calibrated field meters.
• Grab samples will also be collected and submitted to certified laboratories for the constituents identified in the Storm Drain Outfall Monitoring Plan of the San Diego River WMA WQIP and in the MS4 Outfall Monitoring Program Monitoring Plan of the San Diego Bay WMA WQIP, depending on which WMA the outfall is located in.
All sampling and analyses will be conducted in accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 136. Lab reports will be delivered from our lab in CEDEN compatible format, as requested by the WQIP groups.
As directed by the San Diego River WMA and the San Diego Bay WMA monitoring plans, a field duplicate and a field blank will be submitted for the monitoring program. For cost effectiveness, these will be completed as follows:
• 1 duplicate for San Diego Bay.
• 1 duplicate for San Diego River, but it will only include the tests that were not already run as part of the San Diego Bay duplicate.
• 1 blank covering all analytes that are required in either of the two watersheds.
In addition, as required by the WQIPs, we will also collect one sample for total hardness, as well as total organic carbon and total dissolved carbon, from the receiving water upstream of the point where any flow from the outfall converges with the receiving water. During each round of sampling a maximum of seven receiving water samples will be collected. Data from these samples will be incorporated into compliance calculations during reporting.
The monitoring summary report will summarize the results of the analyses, including a comparison of results to the applicable NALs as provided in the Municipal Permit. We will also discuss potential sources of NAL exceedances and recommendations for further investigation if applicable.
Based on the Regional Board’s comments on the City’s Microbial Source Identification Work Plan (MSIWP), submitted in compliance with Time Schedule Order (TSO) Number R9-2024- 0010, additional bacteria sampling will take place during the remainder of the TSO period (through 2028). E. coli samples will be collected up to twice per year during routine dry weather monitoring from six (6) persistently flowing outfalls when sufficient flow is present. The cost associated with this work is planned for removal at the completion of the TSO.
III. Discharge Source Investigations
Source investigations will be required in order to determine a source of any non-stormwater discharges observed at each major outfall. Investigations will be conducted in accordance with the County of San Diego Follow Up Investigation Procedures and will focus on identifying sources of flow, particularly in cases where observations (color, clarity, odor, floatables, etc.) indicate a high possibility of an illegal discharge occurring. Any illegal discharges identified will be directly reported to the City via shared tracking spreadsheet or email, and investigation results will be summarized and included in the monitoring report.
ATTACHMENT B
Mr. Joe Kuhn
March 19, 2026
5440 Morehouse Dive Suite 4500 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 352-6816 Fax (858)352-6817 IV. As-Needed Services
We are also available to provide additional services to support the City’s compliance with stormwater regulations on an as-needed basis. Most funds are expected to be allocated toward assisting the City with regional compliance tasks under Time Schedule Order Number R9-2024- 0010, including field work coordination and annual reporting based on monitoring activities.
Other as-needed services may include, but are not limited to, additional discharge source investigations, inspections of facilities or areas identified as potential sources of NAL exceedances, supplemental sampling, data analysis, reporting, responding to regulatory requests or orders, and literature review.
Cost Estimate
Our proposed costs to complete the scope of services described above are as follows:
Service Cost
1. Dry Weather MS4 Outfall Monitoring and Reporting $14,568
2. Non-Stormwater Persistent Flow Sampling (time and
materials, not to exceed) $44,814
3. Discharge Source Investigations (time and materials, not to exceed) $6,323
4. As-needed Tasks (time and materials, not to exceed) $20,000 Total $85,706
Costs for Task 1 are based on lump sum service, and the costs for Tasks 2 through 4 are based on time and materials. Time and materials services will be completed in accordance with our attached fee schedule.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or would like to discuss this proposal in more detail. We look forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
D-MAX Engineering, Inc.
John Quenzer, MS, QSD, CPSWQ
Vice President
ATTACHMENT B
SF-1
SCHEDULE OF FEES
January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
1 LABOR
Classification Hourly Rate
Word Processor/Admin 100
Drafter 111
Technician 95
Senior Technician 110
Staff Scientist I 121
Staff Scientist II 136
Staff Scientist III 144
Assistant Project Scientist 157
Project Scientist 176
Senior Scientist 200
Principal Scientist 232
Staff Engineer I 136
Staff Engineer II 147
Assistant Project Engineer 170
Project Engineer 191
Senior Engineer 216
Principal Engineer 244
Field and hourly services will be charged
portal to portal from our office, with a twohour minimum.
Appearance as expert witnesses at court
trials, mediation, arbitration hearings and
depositions will be charged at $350/hour.
Time spent preparing for such
appearances will be charged at the above
standard hourly rates.
OTHER CHARGES
Subcontracted services, such as sub
consultants, outside testing, drilling, and
surveyors, will be charged at cost plus
15%. Other project-specific costs, such
as rentals, expendable or special
supplies, special project insurance,
permits and licenses, shipping,
subsistence, tolls and parking, outside
copying/printing, etc., will be charged at
cost plus 15%. Mileage will be charged at
the current IRS rate. Meals, lodging, and
travel expenses, when pre-approved by
the City, will be charged at cost or at
standard per diem rates, as applicable.
Client will be responsible for any
applicable taxes in addition to the fees
due for Services.
1This fee schedule is proposed for work in 2026. Updates to the fee schedule for work in future years will be proposed as applicable and will be based on the San Diego CPI increase from the preceding year.
ATTACHMENT B
REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 12, 2026
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ARTWORK
SELECTIONS FOR THE ARTISTS TO WORK PUBLIC
ART PROGRAM
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: City Manager’s Office
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that City Council review and approve the artwork selections for the Artist to Work Public Art Program.
Fiscal Impact:
The Artists to Work Public Art Program is funded through the City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation. There is no impact to the General Fund.
City’s Strategic Goals:
Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.
BACKGROUND:
On February 27, 2024, the City Council approved the Artists to Work Public Art Program and allocated $250,000 from the City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to support its implementation.
In December 2025, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ 26-05) to solicit artist qualifications for four project categories:
Crosswalk Art (digital design)
Murals
Utility Art Wraps (digital design)
Pole-Mounted Sculptures
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 2 of 4
Applications were open to artists who live or work in San Diego County. Submissions were evaluated based on artistic merit, project feasibility, and connection to the La Mesa community, as outlined in the RFQ’s selection criteria (Attachment A).
The City received a strong response, with 47 total submissions:
9 sculpture submissions
5 mural submissions
9 crosswalk submissions
24 utility art wrap submissions
The Arts & Culture Commission (Commission), together with the Council Arts Subcommittee, met on March 18 and April 15 to review all eligible submissions and develop recommendations for City Council consideration. All approved artwork is anticipated to be installed prior to October 2026.
DISCUSSION:
Crosswalk Art
The Crosswalk Art category features creative digital designs intended to enhance visibility and beautify intersections.
Proposed installation locations include:
Parks Ave. & Normal Ave.
Rolando Elementary School area (Tower St. & Tori Ln. / Rolando entrance) The Tower St. & Tori Ln. location and the crosswalk at the Rolando Elementary School entrance are considered part of one cohesive crosswalk area, and one artist will be selected to design both segments to ensure visual consistency.
Locations were selected to place artwork near schools and in areas that have recently received slurry seal treatment, which supports both community safety and pavement longevity. Final locations may be adjusted based on field conditions.
The recommended designs are included as Attachment B:
Fulton – “Alternative Concept”
Danger – “Space Race Game”
Pearson – “Superbloom” (alternate)
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 3 of 4
Staff requests that the City Council select two designs for installation. The installation will be completed by a City-contracted thermoplastic installer, and minor adjustments may be required to ensure safe installation.
Mural
Artists were invited to propose designs for the exterior of the MacArthur Park Municipal Pool Spa enclosure. Submissions were evaluated on artistic quality, feasibility, and compatibility with the site.
Two mural designs are being forwarded for City Council consideration (Attachment C):
Danger – Arts & Culture Commission recommendation
Pearson –Council Arts Subcommittee recommendation
Both options are provided to offer flexibility in selecting the design that best aligns with the desired aesthetic and community setting. Staff requests that the City Council select one design for installation.
Utility Art Wraps
Utility Art Wraps support digitally designed artwork that will be applied to utility boxes using durable vinyl wraps installed by a professional contractor. The program aims to refresh aging installations and expand artwork into additional neighborhoods. Artists submitted two designs each, and 20 designs are recommended to proceed based on visual impact and compatibility with box dimensions.
Selected designs are included as Attachment D. Staff requests that the City Council select 20 designs for installation
Pole-Mounted Sculptures
Pole-mounted sculptures provide three-dimensional works for highly visible public spaces. The City provides the artists with a steel pole that is six inches in diameter and up to ten feet in length, as well as a square concrete planter as a base for the artwork.
Eight sculptures are recommended for installation. The selected designs are included as Attachment E. Staff requests that the City Council select eight designs for installation Once approved, the pole-mounted sculpture remains the property of the artist and can be sold upon completion of the display period, which will be from October 2026 through September 2028.
Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 12, 2026
Page: 4 of 4
Site selection is underway and will prioritize visibility and equitable distribution across the City using the seven public works Maintenance Zones.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that City Council review and approve the artwork selections for the Artist to Work Public Art Program.
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Amanda Lee
City Manager Assistant City Manager
Attachments: Attachment A – Artist to Work Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Attachment B – Recommended Crosswalk Art Designs
Attachment C – Recommended Mural Designs
Attachment D – Recommended Utility Box Wrap Designs
Attachment E – Recommended Pole-Mounted Sculptures
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
RFQ 26-05
OPEN CALL TO ARTISTS
FOR ARTIST TO WORK PROGRAM
December 4, 2025
City of La Mesa
Finance Department - Purchasing
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
SECTION 1
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
A. INVITATION
The City of La Mesa, funded through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), invites San Diego County artists and artist teams to participate in the Artist to Work Program. This initiative aims to beautify public spaces and celebrate La Mesa’s vibrant and diverse community.
This open call seeks qualifications from talented individuals or teams for projects that infuse creativity, color, and connection into public areas throughout the City.
This program will result in the creation of permanent and temporary public artworks, significantly enhancing La Mesa’s identity and providing opportunities for local artists to contribute to the visual landscape of the community. Artists may be considered for more than one project, depending on qualifications and artistic style.
Qualified artists are invited to submit an online response to the City no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 6, 2026.
B. BACKGROUND OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
The City of La Mesa was incorporated in 1912, as a General Law, Council-Manager municipality.
The City’s approximate population size is 60,000. La Mesa is a full-service city located in San Diego County, just east of the City of San Diego.
SECTION 2
SCOPE OF PROJECT
A. PROJECT OPPORTUNITIES
The City of La Mesa is seeking qualified artists or teams for the following opportunities:
1. Crosswalk Art (Digital Design): Creative and vibrant designs that enhance pedestrian safety and beautify intersections. Up to two (2) artists or teams will be selected. • Artists submit digital artwork only; installation will be performed by a city contractor using thermoplastic materials.
• $300 honorarium for design finalists, $2,000 consideration for final selected design.
Proposed intersections include:
• Parks Ave. & Normal Ave. (4 crosswalks)
• Tower St. at entrance to Rolando Elementary School (1 crosswalk) and Tower St. at Tori Ln. (1 crosswalk)
Final locations and additional locations may be added or adjusted based on field conditions and artist connection to the neighborhood.
2. Murals: A large-scale mural installation on the rear wall of the MacArthur Park Municipal Pool Spa Enclosure (approximately 420 square feet). One (1) artist or team will be selected. • $750 honorarium for finalists; $5,000 stipend for the selected artist (includes materials, fabrication, and installation).
3. Pole-Mounted Sculptures: Temporary sculptures to be installed in seven (7) City maintenance zones at prominent public locations.
• $750 design honorarium for finalists; $5,000 stipend for approved installations. • Loan Period & Ownership: Artwork will be loaned to the City for 24 months.
Ownership of the artwork remains with the artist throughout the loan period. The loan may be extended upon mutual agreement between the Artist and the City. • Estimated Value of Artwork: Artists shall submit an estimated fair market value of the artwork. This valuation is required for insurance purposes and to establish a purchase price shall the City or any member of the public wish to buy the artwork at the conclusion of the loan period.
• Removal & Storage Responsibilities: At the conclusion of the loan period, the Artist is responsible for removal of the sculpture in coordination with City staff. The City is not responsible for dismantling, transporting, or storing the artwork. If the Artist
fails to remove the sculpture within the timeframe specified by the City, the City may remove and store the artwork at the Artist’s expense, and the City will not be liable for damage incurred during this process.
• City-Provided Plaque: The City will provide a standardized plaque including the artist’s name and artwork title (and purchase price, if applicable).
4. Utility Art Wraps (Digital Design): Colorful designs to be applied to approved utility boxes throughout La Mesa. Up to ten (10) artists or teams will be selected. • Artists submit digital artwork only; wraps will be fabricated and installed by the City’s vendor.
• $100 honorarium for design finalists, $750 stipend for selected artwork.
B. PAYMENT SCHEDULE
After designs are approved for installation, artists will receive 50% of the stipend amount upon execution of the agreement, and the remainder of the stipend will be paid upon completion of the artists designated project.
C. ELIGIBILITY
1. Open to artists aged 18 or older who live or work in San Diego County.
2. Applicants may apply individually or as part of a team.
3. Artists with experience overseeing the design, fabrication, and installation of artwork similar to the project opportunities crosswalk digital art, pole-mounted sculptures, murals, and utility box digital art are preferred. Artists without direct experience in these project types may still apply if they can demonstrate the skills, capacity, and project-management ability necessary to successfully complete the work and meet the project goals.
D. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. Crosswalk Art (Digital Design): Creative crosswalk designs shall comply with California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Section 3B.18 standards and all applicable City requirements. Selected artwork will be applied within existing marked crosswalk areas by the City’s contractor.
• Each crosswalk shall include two white transverse (horizontal) lines consistent with CA MUTCD standards, except in school zones, where they shall be yellow. All creative artwork shall fit within these two lines.
• Artwork shall not obscure or diminish the visibility of the transverse lines and shall not be reflective.
• Creative crosswalks are intended solely for aesthetic enhancement and may not include political, religious, or commercial messaging. Designs shall exclude logos, text, advertising, offensive symbols, or geometric shapes (e.g., triangles, octagons) that could be mistaken for traffic-control devices or legends.
• Designs that could distract drivers or be confused with traffic signage or pavement markings are prohibited.
• Artwork shall enhance the streetscape’s visual quality through simplicity and cohesion, using a limited color palette and clear, consistent graphic imagery that avoids visual clutter. Artists are encouraged to consider accessibility and visibility for individuals with color deficiencies or partial sight (see the U.S. Access Board website, https://www.access-board.gov/prowag, for guidance). • If multiple crosswalks at one intersection are designed, the collection shall form a unified and cohesive aesthetic across all crosswalks.
• Artwork shall not extend onto sidewalks, curbs, or gutters. • All colors and patterns shall be uniform, consistent, repetitive, and predictable, ensuring the design supports safe driver and pedestrian behavior (pursuant to CA MUTCD Official Ruling 3(09)-24(I)).
2. Murals:
• Artwork shall be designed for long-term outdoor durability, including resistance to UV exposure, moisture, pool chemicals, and physical wear. • Artists shall use high-quality, fade-resistant exterior mural paints and sealants appropriate for a recreation facility environment.
• The mural may not include text, logos, advertising, or political, religious, or derogatory imagery.
• The City of La Mesa will provide basic preparation of the walls prior to installation and apply graffiti coating after installation.
• The selected artist will coordinate directly with City staff regarding site access, installation schedule, weather considerations, and surface conditions.
3. Pole-Mounted Sculptures:
• City-Provided Structural System
➢ The City will provide a 10-foot-tall, 6-inch-diameter steel pole for the artists to mount their sculpture.
➢ The 10-foot pole will be secured over a 4½-foot steel post that is embedded in a concrete base. This embedded post and concrete foundation are provided by the City and serve as permanent structural support for the sculpture installation.
➢ Sculptures shall include a center lift point so that Public Works staff can safely lift and place the assembled sculpture and 10-foot pole onto the embedded post.
➢ All sculpture components shall be securely fastened to the 10-foot pole using structurally sound methods such as welding, bolting, or bracketing. • Clearance & Height Requirements
➢ The sculpture can be tall and cylindrical in shape, wide with a canopy on top, or a combination of both.
➢ A minimum 7-foot clearance shall be maintained for pedestrians to walk underneath the sculpture wherever it extends beyond the width of the base. ➢ Total sculpture weight shall not exceed 200 pounds, unless supported by stamped structural calculations demonstrating compatibility with the City’s pole and foundation system.
• Mounting and Attachment Requirements
➢ Sculptures shall be designed for secure attachment to the City-provided pole. Acceptable methods include welding, bolting, bracketing, or other structurally sound fasteners.
➢ Artwork shall not interfere with the pole’s structural performance or create hazards during installation or display.
➢ All mounting methods shall ensure long-term stability under typical weather and wind conditions.
• Structural Integrity and Safety Review
➢ All sculptures shall be structurally self-supporting and compatible with the City-provided pole and foundation.
➢ The City Engineer and Building Official will review structural drawings and wind-load calculations and may require modifications to ensure public safety.
➢ Moving, motorized, or illuminated components permitted only upon preapproval by the City.
Wind-Load Requirements
➢ To ensure stability in windy conditions, sculptures shall meet the City’s projected-area wind-load criteria.
A = Height of the projected artwork area (feet)
B = Width of the projected artwork area (feet)
H = Height of the center of the projected area above ground (feet) ➢ Wind Load Limitation: The product of the projected area (A × B) multiplied by the height of its center above ground (H) shall not exceed 350. ➢ Formula: Projected Area (A × B) × Height (H) ≤ 350.
Diagram 1: Wind-Load Calculation. The diagram illustrates the sculpture’s projected area (A × B), the height of the center of that area above ground (H), and the 7-foot minimum pedestrian clearance line. For wind-load review, the projected area and height shall satisfy the formula: (A × B) × H ≤ 350.
B
A
7-foot minimum pedestrian clearance
(Applicable if sculpture elements
extend outside the base) H
• Material and Finish Standards. All materials shall be:
➢ Durable and weather-resistant for a minimum 24-month outdoor installation.
➢ Suitable for exposure to heat, moisture, and temperature changes. ➢ Finished with non-reflective coatings to prevent glare and surface fading. ➢ Artwork may not include text, logos, advertising, or political, religious, or derogatory imagery.
• Installation Responsibilities. Artists shall be responsible for:
➢ Transporting the sculpture to the site.
➢ Providing all hardware and mounting components.
➢ Coordinating installation timing and logistics with City staff. ➢ Installing the artwork in accordance with the approved structural plan. • At the end of the display period:
➢ Artists shall be responsible for removing the artwork in coordination with City staff.
➢ The City is not responsible for dismantling, transporting, or storing the artwork.
➢ If removal is not completed within the required timeframe, the City may remove and store the artwork at the artist’s expense.
Example Installations (Format Reference Only): The following images are provided solely to illustrate the general format of a pole-mounted sculpture installation. These examples are not intended to suggest any specific theme, style, or material. Artists are encouraged to propose original concepts that meet the structural requirements of this RFQ.
3 Utility Art Wraps (Digital Design):
• Artists shall create digital artwork that shall be professionally printed and installed by the City’s vendor using durable, high-quality vinyl wrap material. • A Utility Box Template, similar to Diagram 2, Utility Box Template, shall be provided to selected artists to illustrate the four sides and top of a typical box. However, utility boxes vary in size, shape, and configuration.
• Designs shall avoid all meters, vents, ID numbers, warning labels, locks, and handles. These elements cannot be covered by vinyl.
• Artwork shall not include text, logos, advertising, or political, religious, or derogatory imagery.
• Artists retain copyright to their artwork; however, the City retains reproduction rights for non-commercial use.
• Artists shall be responsible for preparation, design, and coordination with City staff for installation.
Diagram 2: Utility Box Template.
E. ARTIST GUIDELINES
1. Artwork shall adhere to parameters outlined in the City of La Mesa Visual Public Art Selection Process Policy.
2. Artwork shall translate artistic concepts into designs that are appropriate for a public space, taking into consideration maintenance, safety, and longevity.
3. Artwork shall demonstrate a connection to the theme of the project.
4. Artwork shall be sensitive to social, environmental, historical, and other relevant contexts.
5. Artists and workers shall consider safety of pedestrians and participants while doing onsite work.
6. Artwork shall not include text, logos, advertising, or imagery that could be interpreted as commercial, political, derogatory, or religious in nature.
F. MODIFICATIONS
From time-to-time minor modifications may be required to the Scope of Work. Permanent modifications to the Scope of Work will be provided to the contractor in writing. In the event such modifications, in the opinion of the Contractor, make compliance with contract conditions impractical, Contractor shall submit a written request for modification to the requirements in the Scope of Work. This request shall set forth in detail the reasons why the specified changes make the Scope of Work impractical and include Contractor’s proposal or recommendation to relieve the impracticality.
SECTION 3
SELECTION CRITERIA
Applications shall be reviewed by a panel as defined in the City’s Visual Public Art Selection Process Policy. Artists will be rated using the following criteria:
1. Artistic Qualifications:
• Strength and creativity of portfolio.
• Artistic merit and alignment with La Mesa’s character. • Experience working in public settings or on community-based projects.
2. Project Approach and Feasibility
• Demonstrated understanding of site context, materials, and safety. • Ability to complete projects within budget and schedule.
3. Connection to La Mesa
• Residency, employment, volunteer experience, or community connection.
Finalists may be invited to interviews and will receive a design honorarium as outlined above.
Final selections will be recommended by the Arts and Culture Commission and approved by the La Mesa City Council.
SECTION 4
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
A. SUBMISSIONS DUE
Please submit qualifications online in the form of scanned documents through PlanetBids. Only submissions made through the online system will be accepted.
All submissions are due no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 6, 2026. Submissions received after the deadline will not be considered.
B. REQUIRED COMPONENTS
1. Cover Letter: Include artist/team name, contact information, and preferred project(s).
Artists interested in being considered for multiple opportunities shall clearly indicate all project types they wish to be reviewed for (e.g., mural, crosswalk art, sculpture, or utility wrap).
2. Resume: No longer than two (2) pages for each artist or team member, include a list of projects completed during the past ten (10) years, selected public art projects, awards, gallery/studio affiliations, grants/fellowships, and other relevant experience.
3. Two (2) Professional References: Provide contact information for two individuals familiar with the artist’s or team’s work on past public art or related projects.
4. Digital Images of Past Work: Submit five (5) to ten (10) images featuring examples of previous commissioned art or related projects with particular emphasis on works of a similar scope or utilizing similar techniques. Each image shall be numbered and include:
• Title
• Date of completion/installation
• Budget (if applicable)
• Materials/media
• Dimensions
• Location (if applicable)
• Brief description of the work
Artists applying in teams shall split the allotted number of work examples.
5. Letter of Interest/Artist Statement (500 word maximum):
• Describe the conceptual basis for your body of work.
• Describe your experience working with and coordinating teams to successfully incorporate art into a public site.
• Explain why you are applying for this opportunity.
• Describe any connection to the City of La Mesa, such as residency, employment, volunteer work, or community involvement.
13 6. Provide a brief statement outlining your overall approach to completing a public art project in La Mesa. The statement shall address:
• Understanding of the project site and its context
• Considerations for materials, durability, and public safety • Ability to complete the project within the City’s established budget and schedule • A general overview of your typical project timeline (concept, fabrication, installation)
• Any anticipated challenges and how you would address them A Proposal Packet (Section 6) has been included for your use. If you choose to provide your own forms you shall include all information listed.
14 SECTION 5
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS
A. QUALIFICATION EVALUATION PROCESS
Phase I, Qualifications Review: Applications will be evaluated by a panel as outlined using the following criteria to determine which artists advance to the finalist round:
40% Artistic Qualifications
40% Project Approach and Feasibility
20% Connection to La Mesa
Phase 2, Finalist Concept Development: Selected finalists will be invited to develop a concept proposal that demonstrates what they intend to create. Finalists will receive a design honorarium, as specified in this RFQ, to support the preparation of the concept proposal.
Finalist submissions will typically include (but are not limited to):
• A conceptual rendering or visual example of the proposed artwork • A narrative describing artistic intent and site integration • Preliminary materials information
• A refined project timeline and fabrication/installation overview Finalists may also be invited to participate in an interview or presentation with the review panel.
Final Selection: After review of finalist concepts, the panel will make a recommendation to the Arts and Culture Commission, which will forward a final recommendation to the La Mesa City Council for approval.
B. SCHEDULE FOR THE RFQ (all dates tentative)
Call for Artists Released December 4, 2025
Application Deadline January 6, 2026
Review of Applications January 2026
Finalist Interviews / Proposal
Phase Late January – February 2026
Artist Selection & Council Approval March – May 2026
Notice to Proceed June 2026
Artwork Fabrication & Installation June – October 2026
Dedication Ceremony Fall 2026 (post-installation)
C. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Questions related to this RFQ must be submitted through the PlanetBids system and will only be accepted through 12:00 p.m. on Monday, January 5, 2026.
15 D. WAIVER
As a condition of award, all selected artists shall be required to sign the City of La Mesa’s standard Artist Agreement, including Section 19: Waiver, which addresses rights under the California Art Preservation Act (CAPA) and the federal Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA). By entering into the Agreement, the Artist acknowledges and agrees to the following:
“ARTISTS recognizes that they may have certain rights arising from the “California Art Preservation Act” (Civil Code 987 et. seq.) or the “Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990” (17 U.S.C. et.seq.). Those Acts require that a waiver of their provisions be expressly made in writing and being fully informed, ARTISTS and their agents, heirs, successors, and assigns hereby waive any and all right they may have under the provisions of the “California Art Preservation Act” (Civil Code 987 et seq.) or the “Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990” (17 U.S.C. et.seq.). ARTISTS and their agents, heirs, successors, and assigns further agree not to attempt to defeat this waiver by cooperating, encouraging, or assisting any organization which seeks to bring an action under these Acts. CITY has the right to replicate in whole or in part ARTWORK design and ARTWORK.” E. REVISIONS TO THE RFQ
The City reserves the right to revise the RFQ prior to the date that submissions are due. Revisions to the RFQ shall be communicated via PlanetBids vendor and bid management system to all prospective businesses. The City reserves the right to extend the date by which the submittals are due.
F. DISCRETION AND LIABILITY WAIVER
The City reserves the right to exercise discretion and apply its judgment with respect to any qualifications submitted.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all submittals, either in part or in their entirety, or to request and obtain, from one or more of the businesses submitting, supplementary information as may be necessary for City staff to analyze the qualifications pursuant to the contractor selection criteria contained herein.
The City may require contractors to participate in additional rounds of discussions, negotiations, or more refined submittals before the ultimate selection of a contractor is made. These rounds could encompass revisions of the submittal criteria in response to the nature and scope of the initial qualifications.
The contractor, by submitting a response to this RFQ, waives all right to protest or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this RFQ.
This RFQ does not commit the City to award a contract, to defray any costs incurred in the preparation of a submission pursuant to this RFQ, or to procure or contract for work. The company shall be responsible for all costs associated with preparation of their submission to the City.
Any and all materials submitted in response to this RFQ become the property of the City.
Consequently, any and all information contained in such materials shall be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act.
16 The City reserves the right to cancel or modify in part or in its entirety this RFQ including, but not limited to: selection procedures, submittal date, and submittal requirements. If the City cancels or revises the RFQ, all companies will be notified via PlanetBids.
G. CITY’S STANDARD GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
The successful company is expected to execute the City’s standard general services agreement (copy attached) as is with minor modifications as required to customize the agreement to the specific services. Successful companies shall comply with all insurance and licensing requirements as set forth in the standard agreement.
H. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES
Other public agencies may piggyback on this RFQ or the executed agreement from this RFQ award in order to enter into contracts with the successful company for any and all services specified within.
I. PROTESTS
Protests by unsuccessful bidders to the selection for award shall be submitted in writing to the Purchasing Officer no later than ten calendar days after the date of the intent to award. For bids that exceed thirty thousand dollars ($30,000), the City Manager and the Purchasing Officer shall consider such protests in award recommendation or award. The unsuccessful bidder shall have the right to appear at the City Council to protest any award to be confirmed by Council (over $50,000). Failure to submit a timely written protest to the Purchasing Officer shall bar consideration of such protest.
Crosswalks – Anna Pearson
Superbloom - “Superbloom” draws inspiration from
the rare California phenomenon when seasonal rains
awaken dormant wildflower seeds, transforming
hillsides into radiant fields of color. For a brief and extraordinary moment, muted earth tones give way to
vibrant bloom - a powerful reminder that life is always preparing to emerge beneath the surface.
This crosswalk translates that moment of
transformation into the suburban landscape of La
Mesa. Set against asphalt and infrastructure, the
design introduces a burst of organic color that
symbolizes renewal, resilience, and the coexistence of
city and nature.
As pedestrians step off the curb, they move from traffic and routine into a visual “carpet” of blossoms: a brief immersion in color, movement, and softness. While not
a literal hillside, the composition evokes the feeling of walking through one. The intent is to bring a moment of wonder into everyday life.
Just as a superbloom depends on the alignment of
rain, soil, and sunlight, thriving neighborhoods depend on shared care and connection. This design reflects
that parallel - growth emerges when conditions are
right. A superbloom is fleeting and unscheduled. It
arrives unexpectedly and transforms the familiar into
something extraordinary. This crosswalk captures that
sense of surprise.
In the middle of a typical weekday - commuting,
running errands, heading to school - the ground itself
appears to bloom. The intervention is subtle yet
impactful: an emotional pause within routine.
Children may experience it as playful and magical,
adults may feel a quiet lift in mood. The goal is not
simply decoration, but a moment of visual and
emotional interruption - an invitation to notice.
Crosswalks – Channin Fulton
ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT - This alt concept
captures communal interaction through peace
birds in circular flight to represent the
connection, exchanges, and flow that make La
Mesa a thriving community. It’s a visual
celebration of the city that builds relationships,
powers up, and fosters life.
Crosswalks – Nicholas Danger
Murals – Nicholas Danger
Murals – Anna Pearson
Utility Boxes – Annalise Neil Studio
Utility Boxes – Becca Dwyer
Utility Boxes – Belen Islas
Utility Boxes – Bernice Badillo
Utility Boxes – Channin Fulton
Utility Boxes – Christopher Lloyd Tucker
Utility Boxes – Don Masse
Utility Boxes – Hilary Dufour
Utility Boxes – Kate Caughey Art
Utility Boxes – Nicholas Danger
Utility Boxes – Sharon Finzi
Utility Boxes – Sheena Rae Dowling
Housing Crisis by Bradley Begent
La Mesa Jewel by Bradley Begent
Jewel of the Hills by Vicki Leon
Kite String by Vicki Leon
Orion’s Arrival by Vicki Leon
In the City by Christopher Lloyd Tucker
Jam Band by Christopher Lloyd Tucker
Sun Colored by Christopher Lloyd Tucker
DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 6.11.200(M)(3) OF THE
LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE INTENT AND
AUTHORITY FOR CANNABIS DISPENSARIES TO USE THE PHRASE
“DISPENSARY” IN SIGNAGE CONTENT
At the April 28, 2026 Council meeting, the Council voted 3–0 to approve the introduction and first reading of an ordinance amending Section 6.11.200(M)(3) of the La Mesa Municipal Code. The amendment clarifies the intent and authority for cannabis dispensaries to use the term “dispensary” in signage. Councilmembers Lothian and Suzuki and Vice Mayor Cazares voted in favor; Councilmember Dillard and Mayor Arapostathis were absent.
Staff recommends the Council approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
Attachment: A. Draft Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 6.11.200(M)(3) OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
TO CLARIFY THE INTENT AND AUTHORITY FOR CANNABIS DISPENSARIES TO USE THE PHRASE “DISPENSARY” IN SIGNAGE CONTENT
WHEREAS, at times, cannabis dispensaries are mistaken for other types of businesses due to their unique names and advertising (e.g., Cookies mistaken for a bakery); and WHEREAS, to avoid this confusion, especially relating to minors, the Council desires to amend La Mesa Municipal Code (LMMC) Section 6.11.200(M)(3) to clarify the intent and authority for cannabis dispensaries to use the phrase “dispensary” in signage content.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 6.11.200(M)(3) of the La Mesa Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Business identification signage shall be limited to that needed for identification only and shall not contain any logos or information that identifies, advertises, or lists the services or the products offered; however, notwithstanding any provision in this code, the phrase ‘dispensary’ may be used in signage content. Properly permitted signs in existence at the time of adoption of this ordinance that do not comply with this provision may remain in place. Such signs may be maintained as originally permitted, but any new or replacement sign must comply with this provision.”
SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to use summary publication procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 utilizing a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of La Mesa.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 28th day of April 2026, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 12th day of May 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.
BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA ADDING CHAPTER 12.38 TO THE LA MESA
MUNICIPAL COE TO ESTABLISH THE LA MESA ELECTRIC BICYCLE
SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE
CODE SECTIONS 21214.7, 312.5, AND 22651.08
At the Council meeting of April 14, 2026, the Council unanimously approved the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance adding Chapter 12.38 to the La Mesa Municipal Code to establish the La Mesa Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program pursuant to California Vehicle Code Sections 21214.7, 312.5, and 22651.08.
Staff recommends the Council approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.
Attachment: A. Draft Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA ADDING CHAPTER 12.38 TO THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE
LA MESA ELECTRIC BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21214.7, 312.5, AND 22651.08 WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted California Vehicle Code section 21214.7 to establish the “San Diego Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program,” authorizing local authorities within San Diego County to prohibit operation of Class 1 and Class 2 electric bicycles by persons under 12 years of age;
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 312.5 defines “electric bicycle,” sets statewide classifications for Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 electric bicycles, and identifies vehicles that are not electric bicycles pursuant to state law (as amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 791 (Senate Bill 1271), effective January 1, 2025);
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 875 (2023–2024) added California Vehicle Code section 22651.08, authorizing peace officers to remove non-compliant electric-motor vehicles and Class 3 electric bicycles operated unlawfully, and established procedures for seizure, release, administrative cost recovery, and safety-course requirements; WHEREAS, the City seeks to enhance public safety, reduce collisions involving electric bicycles, clarify local operating rules consistent with state law, and implement data collection and public information efforts required by state law; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that adoption of this Ordinance is necessary and appropriate to protect the health, safety, and welfare of residents and visitors, particularly children, while maintaining consistency with state law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and hereby adopts such recitals as findings.
SECTION 2: The City Council desires to add a new Chapter 12.38 entitled “The La Mesa Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Sections 21214.7, 312.5, and 22651.08”, to the La Mesa Municipal Code as follows:
“Chapter 12.38
THE LA MESA ELECTRIC BICYCLE SAFETY PILOT PROGRAM PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21214.7, 312.5, AND 22651.08
12.38.010 Authority
12.38.020 Definitions
12.38.030 Operation by Persons Under 12 – Prohibited
12.38.040 Enforcement; Violations; Penalties
12.38.050 Removal and Seizure of Vehicles
12.38.060 Data Collection and Reporting
12.38.070 Public Information Campaign
12.38.080 Sunset; Pilot Program Expiration
12.38.090 Severability
12.38.010 Authority.
This Chapter is adopted pursuant to:
A. California Vehicle Code Section 21214.7.
B California Vehicle Code Section 312.5.
C California Vehicle Code Section 22651.08
12.38.020 Definitions.
The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall have the meanings defined in this section:
A. “Electric bicycle” means a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts of power. (Veh. Code § 312.5(a)) (1) A “class 1 electric bicycle,” or “low-speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, that is not capable of exclusively propelling the bicycle, except as provided in paragraph (4), that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour, and that is not capable of providing assistance to reach speeds greater than 20 miles per hour. (Veh. Code § 312.5(a)(1))
(2) A “class 2 electric bicycle,” or “low-speed throttle-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour. (Veh. Code § 312.5(a)(2))
(3) A “class 3 electric bicycle,” or “speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, that is not capable of exclusively propelling the bicycle, except as provided in paragraph (4), and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour, and equipped with a speedometer. (Veh. Code § 312.5(a)(3))
(4) A class 1 or class 3 electric bicycle may have start assistance or a walk mode that propels the electric bicycle on motor power alone, up to a maximum speed of 3.7 miles per hour. (Veh. Code § 312.5(a)(4))
B. “Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Program” means a bicycle-safety education course that includes instruction on electric bicycle classifications, age restrictions, safe operation, helmet requirements, traffic laws, and roadway hazard awareness, and that is approved by the City Manager for purposes of this Chapter. The program may be administered by the City, a local nonprofit, or any other qualified provider approved by the City Manager.
12.38.030 Operation by Persons Under 12 – Prohibited
A person under 12 years of age shall not operate a Class 1 or Class 2 electric bicycle within the City’s boundaries.
12.38.040 Enforcement; Violations; Penalties
A. For the first sixty (60) days following the effective date of the Chapter, any violation of Section 12.38.030 shall be punishable by issuance of a warning notice.
B. After the first sixty (60) days following the effective date, any violation of Section
12.38.030 shall constitute an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25).
C. No record of the action shall be transmitted to the court, and no fee shall be imposed upon a citation for this infraction if the parent or legal guardian of the violator delivers proof to the City within one hundred twenty (120) days after issuance of the citation that the violator has completed an Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Program.
D. If an unemancipated minor violates Section 12.38.030, the parent or legal guardian with control or custody of the minor shall be jointly and severally liable for the amount of the fine imposed pursuant to this Section.
12.38.050 Removal and Seizure of Vehicles
A. Authority to Remove. Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22651.08, a peace officer may remove a vehicle located within the City under any of the following circumstances:
(1) A person is operating a vehicle with fewer than four wheels that:
a. Does not meet the definition of an electric bicycle set forth in California Vehicle Code section 312.5;
b. Is powered by an electric motor capable of exclusively propelling the vehicle in excess of 20 miles per hour; and
c. Is being operated by a person who is not licensed to operate the vehicle. (2) A person is operating a Class 3 electric bicycle in violation of California Vehicle Code section 21213(a).
B. Administrative Cost Recovery. The City may establish, by ordinance or resolution, charges equal to its actual administrative costs for the removal, seizure, and storage of a vehicle removed under this section.
(1) An administrative cost recovery fee shall apply to the removal, seizure, or storage of any vehicle under this chapter, in the amount set forth in the City’s adopted cost recovery fee schedule.
(2) The City Council may establish or amend such fees by resolution. (3) The current schedule of applicable fees shall be posted conspicuously on the City’s public website.
C. Release of Seized Vehicles. Vehicles seized under this section shall be released to the owner, violator, or their agent after a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours, provided that:
(1) The request for release is made during normal business hours; and (2) All applicable removal, seizure, and storage costs have been paid.
D. Safety Course Requirement as a Condition of Release. For vehicles removed pursuant to subdivision (A)(2), the City may require the owner, violator, or the parent or legal guardian of the violator to provide proof of completion of an Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Program approved by the City as a condition of release.
12.38.060. Data Collection and Reporting.
The City shall collect and maintain all enforcement data required by California Vehicle Code section 21214.7(d) in connection with this Chapter and shall transmit such data in accordance with Government Code Section 9795. The required data shall include:
A. The total number of traffic stops initiated for violations of this chapter.
B. The results of those traffic stops, including whether a warning or citation issued, property seized, or an arrest made.
C. The number of times a person was stopped for allegedly operating a Class 1 or Class 2 electric bicycle while under 12 years of age but found to be over the age limit.
D. If a warning or citation was issued, a description of the warning or violation cited.
E. If an arrest or traffic stop was made, the offense cited by the officer and the perceived race or ethnicity, gender, and approximate age of the person stopped, provided that the identification of these characteristics is solely based on the observation and perception of the peace officer who initiated the traffic stop.
F. The actions taken by peace officer during a traffic stop, including but not limited to:
(1) Whether the peace officer requested consent to search the person and, if so, whether consent was provided.
a. Whether the peace officer asked for consent to search the person and, if so, whether consent was provided.
b. Whether the peace officer searched the person or property, and, if so, the basis for the search and the type of contraband or evidence discovered. c. Whether the peace officer seized property and, if so, the type of property that was seized and the basis for seizing the property.
G. The number of times a person opted to complete, and completed, an Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Program in lieu of paying a fine.
H. The number of times a person under 12 years of age was operating an electric bicycle and involved in a crash resulting in a permanent, serious injury as defined in California Vehicle Code section 20001, or a fatality, in the six months preceding adoption of this chapter, including the cause of the crash and the class of electric bicycle involved.
I. The number of times a person under 12 years of age was operating an electric bicycle and was involved in a crash resulting in a permanent, serious injury as defined in California Vehicle Code section 20001, or a fatality, after adoption of this Chapter, including the cause of the crash and the class of electric bicycle involved.
12.38.070 Public Information Campaign.
Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 21214.7(e), the City shall administer a public information campaign for at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the enactment of this Chapter, which shall include public announcements in major media outlets and press releases.
12.38.080 Sunset; Pilot Program Expiration.
This Chapter, and all authority granted to the City under California Vehicle Code section 21214.7, shall remain in effect until January 1, 2029, and shall be automatically repealed on that date unless extended or renewed by state law.
12.38.090 Severability.
If any part of this Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, such validity, unlawfulness, or unconstitutional shall not affect the validity, lawfulness, or constitutionality of any other part of this chapter."
SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to use summary publication procedures pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 utilizing a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of La Mesa.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of April 2026, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of said City Council held the 12th day of May 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
__________________________
MARK ARAPOSTATHIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited and that the same has been duly published according to law.
BRITNEY HAZZARD, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)