La Mesa City Council
October 13, 2026

LA MESA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA

A Regular Meeting of the City Council

Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2026, 6:00 p.m.

Location: City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California
Elected
Officials:

Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Genevieve Suzuki
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
City Treasurer Emmett Stewart
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
City Attorney Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
The City Council meeting may be viewed in-person or live on Cox Cable Channel 24 (within La Mesa City limits), AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 (in the San Diego Region), the City’s website (www.cityoflamesa.gov), the City's YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/cityoflamesa) or using the following Zoom Webinar options:

The public may view the meeting live using the following remote options:

Teleconference Meeting Webinar
https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1606535921
Telephone (Audio only)
(669) 216-1590 or (669) 254-5252 Webinar ID: 160 653 5921 Copy and paste the webinar link into your internet browser if the webinar link does not work directly from the agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Each member of the public will have three (3) minutes to address the Council. The Mayor or presiding officer may adjust the allotted speaking time based on the number of speakers or other meeting considerations. The timer begins when the participant begins speaking. Time cannot be combined or yielded to another speaker. No further comments will be entertained after the Mayor or presiding officer closes public comment.

In-Person comments during the meeting: Join us for the City Council meeting at the time and location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Please complete a “Request to Speak” card and submit it to the Council Hostess. When the Mayor identifies you, you may step to the podium and state your name for the record. •
Remote Public Comments: To provide remote oral public comments during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting by computer, mobile phone, or dial in number. On Zoom video conference by computer or mobile phone, use the "Raise Hand" feature. This will notify the moderator that you wish to speak during a specific item on the agenda or during nonagenda Public Comment. Members of the public will not be shown on video but will be able to speak when called upon. If joining the meeting using the Zoom dial-in number, you may raise your hand by pressing *9.
•
How to submit eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published.

Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can be submitted when the agenda is published and until 24 hours prior to the meeting. eComments are limited to 3700 characters (approximately 500 words). eComments may be viewed by the City Council and members of the public following the close of the eComment submission period (24 hours prior to the meeting). Email your comment to [email protected] if you have difficulty submitting an eComment. eComments will not be read aloud as a regular meeting item; however, any member of the Council or member of the public may do so during their respective comment time.
•
Citizens who wish to make an audio/visual presentation pertaining to an item on the agenda, or during Public Comments, should contact the City Clerk’s office at 619.667.1120, no later than 12:00 p.m., the Monday prior to the meeting day. Advance notification will ensure compatibility with City equipment and allow Council meeting presentations to progress smoothly and in a consistent and equitable manner. Please note that all presentations/digital materials are considered part of the maximum time limit provided to speakers.

Agenda reports for items on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk's Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 8130 Allison Avenue, during normal business hours.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of La Mesa encourages the participation of disabled individuals in the services, activities and programs provided by the City. Individuals with disabilities, who require reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the City Council meetings, should contact the Human Resources Department 48 business hours prior to the meeting at 619.667.1175, fax 619.667.1163, or [email protected].

Hearing assisted devices are available for the hearing impaired. A City staff member is available to provide these devices upon entry to City Council meetings, commission meetings or public hearings held in the City Council Chambers. A photo ID or signature will be required to secure a device for the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER DILLARD

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
NOTE: In accordance with state law, an item not scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment; however, the City Council will not be able to discuss or take any action on the item at this meeting.

If appropriate, the item will be referred to Staff or placed on a future agenda.

6. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES

7. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

7.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY

COMMISSION
1 Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Appoint members to fill the openings on the City's Youth Advisory Commission and adopt Resolution confirming the appointments.

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time in which members of the Council or audience may pull items from the CONSENT CALENDAR for discussion. Public Comments are also invited on Consent Calendar items.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 9.1 through 9.9)
The Consent Calendar includes items considered to be routine. Unless discussion is requested by members of the Council or audience, all Consent Calendar items may be approved by one motion.

Recommended Motion:

Approve Consent Calendar Items 9.1 through 9.9.

9.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Recommended Motion:

Approve.

9.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS HELD TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, AND TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 22, 2026
5 Recommended Motion:

Approve.

9.3 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BPR CONSULTING

GROUP, LLC, FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND

FIRE PERMITS, TO UPDATE THE SCHEDULE OF FEES
25 Staff Reference: Chief Koch
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.4 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER

INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE POLICE

DEPARTMENT AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT FOR THE OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $300,000
33 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.5 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND

APPROPRIATION OF A GRANT FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF

TRAFFIC SAFETY TO CONDUCT A SELECTIVE TRAFFIC

ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM FOR DUI ENFORCEMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $115,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027
97 Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.6 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND

APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY TO CONDUCT A TRAFFIC RECORDS
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027
122
Staff Reference: Chief Sweeney
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.7 RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO STRADA TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING TO UPDATE THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
142
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.8 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
TO NV5, INC., TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

SERVICES FOR THE TOWER STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT,
BID 27-05 (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 8307)
157
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

9.9 RESOLUTION AWARDING A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE CONTRACT TO WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC., FOR TREE MAINTENANCE AND RELATED SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $294,700 FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2027
168
Staff Reference: Mr. Throne
Recommended Motion:

Adopt Resolution.

10. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING

10.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTION 6.10.060(B)(3) OF THE

LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE RETAIL CANNABIS
BUSINESS TAX RATE FROM FOUR PERCENT (4%) TO FIVE
PERCENT (5%) OF GROSS RECEIPTS
208
Staff Reference: Ms. Lee
Recommended Motion:

Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

11. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING

11.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.30.020, 2.32.030,

2.73.010, 2.85.010, AND 2.87.010 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL

CODE REGARDING MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN

CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
214
Staff Reference: Ms. Wiegelman
Recommended Motion:

Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)

13. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))

14. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS

15. ADJOURNMENT
DATE: October 13, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Megan Wiegelman, CMC, City Clerk
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY

COMMISSION
On September 22, the City Council interviewed applicants who were interested in being appointed to the City’s Youth Advisory Commission. At the Council meeting on October 13, the Mayor will make the appointments with the approval of the City Council.

Attached is a brief description of the requirements, the number of openings, and the names of each applicant seeking to be appointed.

The Mayor appoint members to fill the openings on the City's Youth Advisory Commission, with the approval of the Council, and adopt Resolution confirming the appointments.

Attachments: A. Resolution
B. List of Applicants

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
WHEREAS, terms on the City of La Mesa Youth Advisory Commission have expired or been vacated; and
WHEREAS, the list of persons below has been recommended to the City Council for appointment to said City of La Mesa Commission.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the following are hereby appointed as members of the City of La Mesa Youth Advisory Commission, with their terms to commence after the oath or affirmation of allegiance for public officers or employees is executed as required by Article XX, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California, and to expire on the dates stated below, or until their successors are appointed and qualified:

Youth Advisory Commission: 9 appointments
(Name) is appointed to fill the vacancy with term ending September 30, 2027. (Name) is appointed to fill the vacancy with term ending September 30, 2027. (Name) is appointed to fill the vacancy with term ending September 30, 2027. (Name) is appointed to fill the Alternate Member vacancy with term ending September 30, 2027.
(Name) is appointed for term ending September 30, 2028. (Name) is appointed for term ending September 30, 2028. (Name) is appointed as an Alternate Member for term ending September 30, 2028.
(Name) is appointed as an Alternate Member for term ending September 30, 2028.
(Name) is appointed as an Alternate Member for term ending September 30, 2028.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Youth Advisory Commission: 9 positions – two-year terms Five (5) member positions: three positions with term expiring September 30, 2027; and two positions with term expiring September 30, 2028.

Four (4) alternate positions: one alternate position with term expiring September 30, 2027; and three alternate positions with terms expiring September 30, 2028.

Members must be between the ages of 13 and 20 years and reside within the City of La Mesa or attend school in the City of La Mesa.

First Appointed Number of Terms
Bodie Arzt
Grace Caamacho
Zian Hobbs
Anthony Legge
Alanis Lee
Hendrix Lee
Mason Littig
Mikaeyla Matthews
Giovanni Natalia
Santana Reardon
Jaylyn Surrency
Quinn Suzuki
APPLICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

1 La Mesa City Council
Meeting Minutes
Date:

Location:

September 8, 2026, 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Genevieve Suzuki
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items may be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION - COUNCILMEMBER SUZUKI

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. ANNUAL ROTATION OF THE VICE MAYOR
Mayor Arapostathis thanked Councilmember Cazares for her service as Vice Mayor and announced that Councilmember Suzuki would serve as the next Vice Mayor.

3. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

2 4. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council, and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

5. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

6. PRESENTATIONS

6.1 PROCLAIMING SEPTEMBER AS NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS
MONTH
Mayor Arapostathis read the proclamation proclaiming September as National Preparedness Month.

7. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Truth spoke regarding the remote public comment process, the La Mesa Gateway sign, and concerns about potential traffic and parking impacts associated with the development project at the Spring Street Trolley Station.

MaryAnn spoke regarding issues affecting the neighborhood as a result of the Meritage project on Jericho Road.

Cindy Maina spoke regarding issues affecting the neighborhood as a result of the Meritage project on Jericho Road.

Toni Lopez spoke regarding speeding concerns on Date and Orange Avenues and inquired about authorized users of the “Staff Only” EV charging stations near City Hall.

Ian Allen spoke regarding issues affecting the neighborhood as a result of the Meritage project on Jericho Road.

Abigail Scott presented a proposal to transform a vacant lot into a regenerative community garden.

Andrew Lawson introduced himself as a candidate for 79th Assembly District.

8. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.

9. HEARINGS

9.1 INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR CITY TREASURER AND

CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT

3 Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice.

Mayor Arapostathis opened the hearing for Item 9.1.

Andee Aceves spoke regarding the applicants’ qualifications and stated her recommendation for appointment.

City Clerk Wiegelman provided an overview of the City Treasurer vacancy and the appointment process.

The following applicants provided a verbal presentation outlining their qualifications and interest in serving as the City Treasurer:

William Exeter
Emmett Stewart
Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
Close the hearing.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)
Resolution No. 2026-096
Moved By Councilmember Dillard
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
Appoint Emmett Stewart as City Treasurer and adopt Resolution confirming the appointment.

For (4): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Against (1): Councilmember Lothian
Approved (4 to 1)

10. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

4 10.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ARTS AND CULTURE

COMMISSION, ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION,

MOBILITY COMMISSION, AND PARKS AND RECREATION

COMMISSION
City Clerk Wiegelman provided an overview of the three remaining vacancies on the Arts and Culture Commission, Mobility Commission, and Environmental Sustainability Commission, as well as the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District’s nomination of Eric Nunez to the Parks and Recreation Commission.

Mayor Arapostathis nominated the following individuals for appointment or reappointment to the various City Boards and Commissions:

Arts and Culture Commission
Rodney Elliot as the performing arts representative.

Environmental Sustainability Commission
Emily Fisher as a professional representative.

Mobility Commission
Dinah Justice as an at-large representative.

Resolution No. 2026-097
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Cazares
(1) Approve the appointment of Rodney Elliot as the performing arts representative on the Arts and Culture Commission; (2) approve the appointment of Emily Fisher as a professional representative on the Environmental Sustainability Commission; (3) approve the reappointment of Dinah Justice as an at-large representative on the Mobility Commission; (4) appoint Eric Nunez as the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District representative on the Parks and Recreation Commission; and (5) adopt Resolution confirming the appointments and reappointments.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

11. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR

5 Truth spoke on Item 12.12.

12. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 12.1 through 12.13)
*If a public hearing item is part of the Consent Calendar, the public hearing shall be deemed held if the item is not removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action (Item 12.9).

Councilmember Lothian made comments on Item 12.6.

Councilmember Cazares made comments on Item 12.7.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Suzuki
Approve Consent Calendar Items 12.1 through 12.13.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

12.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

12.2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2026
Approve.

12.3 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING HELD MONDAY, AUGUST 10, 2026
Approve.

12.4 CITY TREASURER'S QUARTERLY REPORT (APRIL 2026 - JUNE 2026)
Receive and file.

12.5 ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY OF LA MESA INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027
Approve.

6 12.6 PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY UPDATE (APRIL 2026 – JUNE 2026)
Receive and file.

12.7 RATIFICATION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL OF PROJECT 2026-0092

RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL
FOR PROJECT 2026-0092, A MAJOR REMODEL AND FAÇADE

IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LOCATED AT 8370 LA MESA BOULEVARD, IN THE CD-D
(DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL / URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
AND DOWNTOWN VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (APN 470-561-17- 00)
Resolution No. 2026-098
Adopt Resolution.

12.8 RATIFICATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF PROJECT 2026-0560

RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
OF PROJECT 2026-0560 - A ONE-LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO

CONVERT AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT OFFICE BUILDING TO A
COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM AT 5575 LAKE PARK WAY IN THE

CN-D (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL / URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY)
ZONE
Resolution No. 2026-099
Adopt Resolution.

12.9 *FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL

PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) FOR

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026 DRAFT CAPER

AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO MAKE ANY NECESSARY
CORRECTIONS AND SUBMIT TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY SEPTEMBER 28, 2026
Resolution No. 2026-100
Adopt Resolution.

7 12.10 POLICE CHIEF'S QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT (APRIL 2026 - JUNE 2026)
Receive and file.

12.11 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO LM
RASMUSSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR BID 27.09, POLICE

DEPARTMENT TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY OFFICE EXPANSION (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 8615)
Resolution No. 2026-101
Adopt Resolution.

12.12 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT

WITH PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE ACTION PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR THE CIVICSPARK PROGRAM
2026-2027 SERVICE YEAR
Resolution No. 2026-102
Adopt Resolution.

12.13 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE SECOND

AMENDED AND RESTATED WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT

AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT
Resolution No. 2026-103
Adopt Resolution.

13. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING

13.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LA MESA DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY OF

SAN DIEGO TO ENFORCE REGULATIONS FOR THE DISCHARGE OF

INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TO SEWERAGE FACILITIES,

PRETREATMENT, AND SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM
City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.

Environmental Manager Kuhn provided an overview of the proposed ordinance updating the City’s Municipal Code provisions related to industrial wastewater to align with the Metro Sewer JPA agreement and current requirements. The ordinance would transfer primary enforcement, billing, and cost recovery authority to the City of San Diego and update

8 provisions related to wastewater pretreatment and source control to help protect the regional Pure Water system.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

14. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING

14.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP

FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED ON LA PERLA WAY

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF TITLE 24 OF THE LA MESA

MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE PROPERTIES ADDRESSED AS
4821, 4831, AND 4841 LA PERLA WAY (APNs 495-423-10, 495-423-13, AND 495-423-14) SEMI-RURAL ESTATE / SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY (R1E-P)
City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.

Ordinance No. 2026-2929
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

15. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS

15.1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE CITY

ATTORNEY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY ATTORNEY TARA

MAZZANTI

9 Mayor Arapostathis introduced incoming City Attorney Tara Mazzanti and noted that City Attorney Glenn Sabine would retire on September 12, 2026, after nearly 29 years of service. He stated that Ms. Mazzanti had been selected following a competitive recruitment and interview process and highlighted her more than 15 years of municipal law experience serving California cities, most recently as Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Livermore.

City Attorney Tara Mazzanti introduced herself and expressed her appreciation for the opportunity to serve the City.

The Mayor and Council welcomed City Attorney Mazzanti to the City of La Mesa.

In compliance with the Government Code, the Mayor stated the key terms of City Attorney Tara Mazzanti's employment agreement as follows:
 The agreement is effective October 13, 2026;
 The annual base salary is $292,000; and
 The City Attorney shall receive the benefits provided in the Summary of Management Group Benefits, except as herein
provided:
o The City Attorney shall receive an automobile allowance in the total amount of $6,000 annually;
o The City shall pay the maximum annually allowed to the City's 457 deferred compensation program on behalf of the City Attorney in equal proportionate amounts each pay period; o The City Attorney shall accrue 180 hours of vacation each year and receive an advance of 80 hours of vacation available to her on her start date; and
o If the City terminates the Employment Agreement early, without cause, the Agreement provides for a severance payment
equivalent to six months base salary.

Resolution No. 2026-104
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Suzuki
Adopt Resolution.

10 For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

16. STAFF REPORTS

16.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GLENN SABINE FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES; AND

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
180-DAY WAITING PERIOD TO HIRE A CALPERS RETIRED

ANNUITANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 7522.56, 2122(H), AND 21224
Director of Human Resources Spaniol explained that the proposed contract and resolution would authorize retiring City Attorney Sabine to serve as Interim City Attorney as a retired annuitant through October 12, 2026, with transition support through October 31, 2026. She noted that the City was required to waive the 180-day waiting period under CalPERS rules and stated that the appointment would ensure continuity of legal services and a smooth transition to the incoming City Attorney.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Truth thanked City Attorney Sabine for his service to the City.

Resolution No. 2026-105
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Approve the Agreement and adopt Resolution.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

16.2 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF THE LA MESA

COMMUNITY PARKING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE

LA MESA VILLAGE ENHANCEMENT FUND PROGRAM, AND

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS
Assistant to the City Manager Dedmon provided an overview of the La Mesa Village Enhancement Fund program and the Community Parking

11 Commission’s funding recommendations. The Commission recommended $20,000 for La Mesa Village Association/Acru Health’s Wellness Fair and $15,000 for Diversionary Theater’s La Mesa Pride, for a total of $35,000 in recommended funding.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Truth expressed concerns regarding the proposed allocations and use of the Downtown Parking Fund.

Resolution No. 2026-106
Moved By Vice Mayor Suzuki
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
(1) Approve the allocation of La Mesa Village Enhancement Fund Program funding, as recommended by the La Mesa Community Parking Commission, in the amount of $35,000, with the following allocations:
$20,000 for the La Mesa Village Association/Acru Health 2027 Annual Wellness Fair and $15,000 for the Diversionary Theater La Mesa Pride event; and (2) adopt Resolution appropriating $35,000 from the Downtown Parking Fund to the Fiscal Year 2027 Downtown Village Enhancement Fund budget.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

17. COUNCIL INITIATED

17.1 CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO REVIEW TRAFFIC AND

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CONDITIONS IN THE AREA OF LEE AVENUE,

SUNSET STREET, AND MAPLE AVENUE - VICE MAYOR CAZARES
Councilmember Cazares presented concerns raised by residents regarding traffic and pedestrian safety along Lee Avenue, Sunset Drive, and Maple Avenue, including roadway width, on-street parking, visibility, and pedestrian conditions.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Councilmember Cazares
Seconded By Vice Mayor Suzuki

12 Direct staff to review traffic and pedestrian safety conditions in the area of Lee Avenue, Sunset Street, and Maple Avenue.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

18. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions, and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

19. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
Mayor Arapostathis and Vice Mayor Suzuki announced they would be attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo in Anaheim, California, from September 23 through September 25, 2026.

20. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

21. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 7:38 p.m. in honor of Bob Kuhne, a longtime local educator and founder of Peter Pan Junior Theater. Mayor Arapostathis recognized Mr. Kuhne’s contributions to the community and his lasting impact on generations of local students through education and the performing arts.
_________________________
City Clerk

1 La Mesa City Council and La Mesa Public Financing Authority Meeting Minutes
Date:

Location:

September 22, 2026, 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Mark Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Genevieve Suzuki
Councilmember Lauren Cazares
Councilmember Patricia N. Dillard
Councilmember Laura Lothian
Staff: City Manager Greg Humora
Assistant City Manager Amanda Lee
Interim City Attorney Glenn Sabine
City Clerk Megan Wiegelman
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items may be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented, except for Item 5.1, the proclamation honoring City Attorney Glenn Sabine, which was presented following City Attorney Remarks.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Councilmember Cazares announced that she was participating remotely under the just cause provision of Government Code Section 54953.8.3(c)(4), which allows for remote participation while traveling on official business of the legislative body or another state or local agency. She stated that there were no individuals present in the room with her.

1.1 INVOCATION - VICE MAYOR SUZUKI

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2 2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council, and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 PROCLAMATION HONORING CITY ATTORNEY GLENN SABINE

UPON HIS RETIREMENT AND RECOGNIZING HIS DEDICATED

SERVICE TO THE CITY
Mayor Arapostathis read a proclamation honoring City Attorney Glenn Sabine upon his retirement and recognizing his dedicated service to the City. The Mayor, Council, and City Manager Humora then presented City Attorney Sabine with a La Mesa street sign and plaque in recognition of his many years of service.

5.2 PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 4 - 10, 2026, AS FIRE

PREVENTION WEEK
Mayor Arapostathis read the proclamation proclaiming the week of October 4 - 10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Truth commented on the public comment process, freedom of speech, and the appointment of the new City Treasurer.

Becky Rapp spoke on the public health consequences of marijuana and intoxicating hemp products.

Gene Carpenter spoke about license plate reader data sharing and the City’s Flock Safety and Vigilant Solutions data audit logs.

Manny Aceves commented on the appointment of the new City Treasurer.

Andee Aceves commented on the appointment of the new City Treasurer.

Kirsten Ireson spoke on current and upcoming events at the La Mesa Community Library and requested that the City’s website include a link to the library’s website.

3 Vaughn Rios spoke about Waite Drive Park and flooding and drainage issues in his neighborhood.

Marco Espinosa spoke about his experiences attending City Council meetings throughout the San Diego region.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS

8.1 ANNUAL INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR OPENINGS ON THE

YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
City Clerk Wiegelman briefly explained the interview process and reported that Camryn Langdon had withdrawn their application from consideration.

The following applicants spoke regarding their qualifications and interest in being appointed to the Youth Advisory Commission:

Bodie Arzt
Anthony Legge
Alanis Lee
Hendrix Lee
Mason Littig
Mikaeyla Matthews
Giovanni Natalia
Jaylyn Surrency
Quinn Suzuki
City Clerk Wiegelman said the appointments would be made at the October 13 Council meeting.

No action was taken following the interviews.

Truth commended all applicants who applied and participated in the interview process.

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments on Consent Calendar items.

4 10. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 10.1 through 10.6)
Councilmember Cazares asked whether any of the Consent Calendar items had a significant budgetary impact other than Item 10.6.

Mayor Arapostathis responded that none of the other items had a significant budgetary impact.

Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Approve Consent Calendar Items 10.1 through 10.6.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

10.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

10.2 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE BODY AND APPENDIX OF THE CITY’S AMENDED LOCAL CONFLICT

OF INTEREST CODE
Resolution No. 2026-107
Adopt Resolution.

10.3 RESOLUTION WAIVING COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.40.070(a)(7)

AND AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN SIGN &
AWNING, INC., FOR UTILITY BOX ART WRAP SERVICES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $86,050
Resolution No. 2026-108
Adopt Resolution.

10.4 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID 27-05 AND AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MIRAMAR GENERAL

ENGINEERING FOR THE TOWER STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 8307)

5 Resolution No. 2026-109
Adopt Resolution.

10.5 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WITH SC VALLEY ENGINEERING, INC., FOR THE PHASE 6 SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BID 25-12 (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 8103)
Resolution No. 2026-110
Adopt Resolution.

10.6 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE POLICE STATION COOLING

TOWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT

RESOLUTION WAIVING COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS

PURSUANT TO LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

2.40.070(a)(5)(7), APPROPRIATING GENERAL FUND RESERVES,

AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO B&B
MECHANICAL, INC., FOR THE POLICE STATION COOLING TOWER
REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
8641)
Resolution No. 2026-111
Adopt Resolution.

11. STAFF REPORTS

11.1 ANALYSIS OF THE FEASIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF

PARKING MODIFICATIONS IN THE DOWNTOWN VILLAGE
Assistant to the City Manager Dedmon provided an analysis of five proposed parking modifications in the Downtown Village, including adjustments to red curbs and loading zones, relocation of bike racks to create golf cart parking, expansion of the Allison Avenue parking lot by removing a landscaped area, and installation of parking T’s. Staff recommended moving forward with several modifications, while recommending against expanding the Allison Avenue parking lot due to the estimated $50,000 cost and retaining the red curb at Sprouts Market due to sight-distance requirements.

Truth commented on the recommended parking modifications for the Downtown Village.

Council questions and comments ensued.

6 Mayor Arapostathis announced that he would abstain from the vote because he had a potential conflict of interest due to the proximity of his home to the Downtown Village.

Moved By Councilmember Lothian
Seconded By Vice Mayor Suzuki
Direct staff to make the following modifications intended to provide additional parking spaces on the east side of Spring Street in Downtown La Mesa: (1) Reduce the red curb on Allison Avenue, just west of 8361 Allison Avenue, to add one metered parking space; (2) Reduce the passenger loading zone in front of 4719 Palm Avenue to add two metered parking spaces, while maintaining 19 feet of passenger loading zone; (3) Relocate two bike racks on La Mesa Boulevard to create two metered golf cart and motorcycle parking spaces and monitor parking behavior for six months before considering expansion to additional areas. At the conclusion of the six-month period, return to Council with a recommendation to either expand to additional areas or discontinue the program; (4) Mark all trial and future golf cart parking spaces with a painted or stenciled golf cart symbol; (5) Retain the existing trees and landscaped area in the Allison Avenue parking lot; (6) Retain the existing red curb at Sprouts Market; and (7) Begin neighborhood engagement in accordance with the adopted Parking T Marking Policy for residential areas.

For (4): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Vice Mayor Suzuki
Abstain (1): Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (4 to 0)

12. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING

12.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.30.020, 2.32.030,

2.73.010, 2.85.010, AND 2.87.010 OF THE LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN CITY

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Interim City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.

Dave Hardenburger expressed support for updating membership requirements for the Community Police Oversight Board.

7 Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Councilmember Dillard
Seconded By Councilmember Lothian
Approve the introduction and first reading of the Ordinance.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

13. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING

13.1 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LA MESA DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY OF

SAN DIEGO TO ENFORCE REGULATIONS FOR THE DISCHARGE OF

INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TO SEWERAGE FACILITIES,

PRETREATMENT, AND SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM
Interim City Attorney Sabine read the title of the Ordinance.

Ordinance No. 2026-2930
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Suzuki
Approve the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

14. COUNCIL INITIATED

14.1 CONSIDERATION OF SENDING A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO
GOVERNOR NEWSOM FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 2518 (SHARPCOLLINS): SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY:

ENERGIZATION PILOT PROGRAM - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS
Mayor Arapostathis presented a request to support Assembly Bill 2518, which would establish a pilot program to improve the predictability and efficiency of the electric energization process for affordable housing and essential community infrastructure projects while maintaining existing safety and reliability requirements.

8 Truth raised concerns about San Diego Gas & Electric and Assembly Bill 2518.

Council questions and comments ensued.

Moved By Councilmember Dillard
Seconded By Mayor Arapostathis
Direct staff to prepare and transmit a letter to Governor Newsom expressing support for Assembly Bill 2518 (Sharp-Collins): San Diego Gas and Electric Company: Energization Pilot Program and requesting his signature.

For (5): Councilmember Cazares, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, Vice Mayor Suzuki, and Mayor Arapostathis
Approved (5 to 0)

15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions, and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

16. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3(d))
Mayor Arapostathis and Vice Mayor Suzuki announced they would be attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo in Anaheim, California, from September 23 through September 25, 2026.

17. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

18. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 7:34 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 13, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECOND

AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH BPR CONSULTING GROUP, LLC

FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND

FIRE PERMITS TO UPDATE THE SCHEDULE OF FEES
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Fire
Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the second amendment to the agreement with BPR Consulting Group, LLC for plan review services for building and fire permits, to update the schedule of fees for Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27).

Fiscal Impact:

Fees are assessed to private development to recover costs associated with plan review. The total annual fees for Professional Services (2203-6430) would remain the same at $100,000 for plan review services for FY27.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

BACKGROUND:

To assist staff in managing workload associated with private development activity, a Request for Proposals (RFP) 23-20 for plan review services for building and fire permits was published on the City’s online bid system. A contract was awarded to BPR Consulting Group, LLC (BPR) in FY24 in the amount of $50,000. This contract provides for annual renewals by mutual written consent of both parties with the City Manager having sole and exclusive right to exercise any options contained in the agreement on

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: Oktober 13, 2026
Page: 2 of 2
behalf of the City. An amendment was approved on October 4, 2024 to increase the annual contract amount to $100,000.

DISCUSSION:

BPR submitted an updated rate schedule request on June 1, 2026 for FY27. BPR has based this request on a 2.8% Cost-of-Living Adjustment. Changes to the schedule of fees require City Council approval.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the second amendment to the professional services agreement with BPR Consulting Group, LLC for plan review services for building and fire permits, to update the schedule of fees.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Bent Koch
City Manager Fire Chief
Attachments:

A – Resolution No. 2026-XXX
B – 2
nd Amendment to BPR Contract and
Exhibit A to 2nd Amendment - Schedule of Fees for FY27

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BPR

CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR

BUILDING AND FIRE PERMITS, TO UPDATE THE SCHEDULE OF
FEES
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has a strategic goal to increase livability by promoting a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home; WHEREAS, La Mesa utilizes outside contracts to supplement staff in providing services as necessary to maintain high levels of service to the community; WHEREAS, the Fire Department has a need for outside contract assistance to provide plan review services for building and fire permits; WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals (RFP) 23-20 for plan review services for building and fire permits was published on the City's online bid system; WHEREAS, it was determined that BPR Consulting Group would best fit the City's needs for these services;
WHEREAS, a Resolution was approved to award RFP 23-20 and schedule of fees for Plan Review Services for Building and Fire Permits to BPR Consulting Group, LLC (BPR) for FY24;
WHEREAS, an amendment was executed on October 4, 2024 to increase the annual amount of the contract to $100,000;
WHEREAS, BPR submitted an updated rate schedule on June 1, 2026 for FY27, attached hereto;
WHEREAS, BPR has based this request on a 2.8% Cost-of-Living Adjustment; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department is requesting that Council approve the updated rate schedule for FY27.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council approves the second amendment to the professional services agreement with BPR Consulting Group, LLC for plan review services for building and fire permits, to update the schedule of fees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held this 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026-__, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF LA MESA AND BPR CONSULTING GROUP,

LLC FOR PLAN REVIEW SERVICES FOR BUILDING AND FIRE PERMITS ___________________________________________________________ THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT executed this __ day of _________, 2026, by and between the City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and BPR Consulting Group, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."

1. RECITALS:

1.1 The City and Contractor have entered into an agreement for professional services for plan review services for the City (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to Section 18 – “Integration; Amendments” of the Agreement the parties may amend the same upon written mutual consent.

1.2 The Contractor desires to update the schedule of fees for professional services provided for FY27.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Section 1. Section 8 of the Agreement for contract term is hereby amended to read:

Final payment of fees shall be upon delivery of approved final services. Progress payments shall be made based upon evidence that the work is progressing satisfactorily as determined by the City's Project Manager and substantiated with detailed invoices. The amount to be billed shall be based on the Contractor schedule of fees for professional services and the actual time required for each activity. The schedule of fees and estimated time for the project, dated June 1, 2026, are as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.

The total fee for professional services shall be billed on a monthly basis with a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) Dollars per term of the Agreement.

Section 3. All other terms, conditions and obligations contained in the Agreement other than those specified in this Second Amendment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Agreement as of the date first above written.

BPR Consulting Group, LLC
Date: By:

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO, Principal-in-Charge

CITY OF LA MESA,
A Municipal Corporation
Date: By:

Greg Humora, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM

CITY ATTORNEY

BPR
June 1, 2026
Ken King, Fire Marshal
City of La Mesa
8054 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
[email protected]
RE: FY 26/27 Billing Rates
Dear Marshal King,
BPR Consulting Group strives to provide high quality services to our customers, and to do so, it is necessary to maintain highly qualified and experienced staff. Our goal is to maintain our hourly billing rates for the duration of our agreements even where these agreements allow for annual increases for the services we provide. Due to recent cost increases related to employee salaries, health benefits and other market issues outside our control, we find it necessary to slightly adjust our hourly billing rates for the next fiscal year.

The rates are adjusted using the COLA (2.8% as of April 2026, per https://www.ssa.gov/news/en/cola/index.html.)
Attached, please find our updated hourly billing rates effective 7/1/26.

Please feel free to reach out to us with any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

BPR CONSULTING GROUP
Debbie Thorson, CFO
Cc: Bill Rodgers, [email protected]

BPR

COST SCHEDULE – FY2026-2027 PLAN REVIEW SERVICES: For complete plan review services for building projects reviewed in either hard copy of electronic format we propose utilizing the hourly billing rates included in the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below for the specific labor classification utilized.

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
The rates displayed in the schedule below reflect BPR’s current hourly billing rates.

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
Licensed Plan Review Engineer (structural, civil, electrical, mechanical)..................$153 ICC Certified Plans Examiner..........................................................................................126 CASp Plans Examiner or Inspector.................................................................................132 Fire Protection Engineer.................................................................................................153 ICC Fire Plans Examiner..................................................................................................126 Permit Technician* ....................................................................................................... 70 to 79 Permit Technician Trainee/ Building Department Support Staff .........................................47 * Based on qualifications and certifications of proposed staff.  Shipping: There is no charge for courier or shipping services for plan reviews conducted off site.
 Expedited Plan Reviews: Expedited plan reviews can be provided upon request.

Fees for expedited plan review services will be 145% of the above noted hourly rates.

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 13, 2026
SUBJECT: PROPOSED MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)
BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S OFFICE AND

THE LA MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE

OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $300,000
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Police Department
Recommendation:

Approve a resolution authorizing the Chief of Police to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement between the Police Department and the San Diego County Sheriff’s Office for the Operation Stonegarden Grant in the Amount of $300,000.

Fiscal Impact:

The grant is cost reimbursement, requiring the City to pay costs upfront and reimbursement for allowable costs associated with grant activities and equipment costs up to $300,000.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

BACKGROUND:

In 2005, United States Department of Homeland Security established Operation Stonegarden to enhance cooperation and coordination among federal, state, tribal, and local law enforcement in an effort to reduce border-related state crimes. The Stonegarden grant is focused on addressing crime and is not related to immigration enforcement, as stated in the Memorandum of Agreement (Section 4.2).

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
The La Mesa Police Department will conduct all Stonegarden operations in compliance with the California Values Act (SB 54) and applicable department policies. This is a competitive grant sponsored by the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), awarding over eight million dollars toward combating border-related violence within California.

DISCUSSION:

The City of La Mesa has been authorized to receive Stonegarden Operations grant funding of $300,000. The operational funding consists of up to $157,600 in operational overtime, $12,056 for fringe benefits, and $5,344 for mileage costs. The equipment funding consists of $125,000 for a fully equipped marked patrol truck. This marked patrol truck, a pursuit-rated Ford F150, would match the Department’s existing DUI truck, and would additionally serve as a vehicle for the Department’s Mobile Field Force Team, which requires the ability to transport bulky equipment and personnel during emergency operations.

La Mesa has three major freeways running through it and five trolley stations that can directly link individuals to the US/Mexico border. These transportation corridors have the potential to bring border-related crime (e.g. drug smuggling, trafficking) into the surrounding areas, including La Mesa.

This grant would allow officers, detectives, dispatchers, and sergeants from the Police Department to work with other police personnel throughout the County on reimbursable overtime to address border-related criminal activity, which affects La Mesa and the entire county. The majority of the operations funded for La Mesa Police personnel will take place within and/or surrounding areas of the City of La Mesa. Most other San Diego County police agencies also participate with the San Diego Sherrif’s Office (Sheriff’s Office) on this grant. Staffing Operation Stonegarden will be on an overtime basis only and will not affect the normal daily operations within the Police Department.

This grant process involves each local agency submitting their overtime requests to the Sheriff’s Office. The Sheriff’s Office will forward the San Diego County request to the State Administrative Agency (SAA), who will then submit the reimbursement request to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

On grant funded overtime, La Mesa Police personnel would typically work with the Sheriff’s Department and other allied local, state, and federal agency personnel conducting activities similar to:
 High visibility enforcement and traffic stop activity in high-intensity drug trafficking areas within the region
 Offer ground support for aerial flights during the day and night

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
 High visibility criminal interdiction and/or covert interdiction operations  Specific operations targeting urban and rural border areas of San Diego County
All overtime will be reimbursed up to $157,600, including an additional $12,056 for personnel fringe benefits.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Police Department’s participation and entering into a MOA with the San Diego Sheriff’s Office for the Operation Stonegarden Grant, which will reimburse expenses related to addressing regional crime with a border nexus.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Ray Sweeney
City Manager Chief of Police
Attachments: A. OPSG Resolution 2025-26
B. FY 2025 OPSG Memorandum of Agreement
Exhibits: A. FY 2025 OPSG Budget Worksheet
B. FY 2025 OPSG Standard Assurances
C. FY 2025 OPSG Required Federal Grant Provisions
D. FY 2025 OPSG Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form
E. FY 2025 OPSG Operations Order Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER INTO A

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT FOR THE OPERATION STONEGARDEN GRANT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $300,000
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has a strategic goal to maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council authorizes the Chief of Police to sign and enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department and the La Mesa Police Department for the reimbursement of overtime and equipment expenditures incurred while increasing law enforcement presence in the County of San Diego to reduce crime with a border nexus by enforcing state and local laws.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City, if awarded the grant, appropriates the funds in the amount of $300,000 for Operation Stonegarden; provided however, that if the actual revenue received from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to equal the amount actually received.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

1 AGREEMENT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025

OPERATION STONEGARDEN (OPSG)

1. PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (COUNTY), the CITY OF

CARLSBAD, CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CITY OF EL CAJON, CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CITY OF LA MESA, CITY OF OCEANSIDE (collectively the CITIES), SAN DIEGO

UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (SDUPD), CITY OF PORT HUENEME (PH), COUNTY OF

ORANGE (OC), COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (SLOC), COUNTY OF SANTA

BARBARA (SBC), COUNTY OF VENTURA (VC), COUNTY OF MONTEREY (MC),

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO (SMC), CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (CHP), CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (DFW), and the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (DPR), each a PARTY and collectively the PARTIES, for support of the Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) program.

1.1 Party Departments or Agencies Participating In The Agreement

1.1.1 For the COUNTY, participating agency is the Sheriff's Office (SHERIFF).

1.1.2 For the CITIES, SDUPD, and PH, participating agencies are their respective police departments.

1.1.3 For OC, SLOC, SBC, VC, MC, and SMC participating agencies are their respective Sheriff's Departments.

1.1.4 CHP, DFW, and DPR do not have subordinate agencies or department participants.

2. RECITALS

2.1 WHEREAS, COUNTY through SHERIFF applied for, and was awarded grant funds from the U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) passed through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) grant program. As an applicant for the San Diego Border Patrol Sector, SHERIFF shall be the lead agency to manage the OPSG program.

2.2 WHEREAS, funds shall be used to support the OPSG program to enhance law enforcement preparedness and operational readiness along the land and water borders of the United States.

2.3 WHEREAS, Government Code § 55632 authorizes COUNTY and PARTIES to contract for provision of joint law enforcement services.

2 2.4 WHEREAS, PARTIES desire to enter into an agreement with provisions concerning the nature and extent of OPSG collaboration, services rendered, and compensation.

2.5 WHEREAS, COUNTY, by action of the Board of Supervisors Minute Order No. 06 on June 24, 2025, approved the appropriation and use of FY 2025 OPSG funds to reimburse PARTIES for program related overtime and fringe benefits; equipment purchases and maintenance costs; fuel; mileage; flight; and management and administration costs incurred not to exceed the amounts described in Exhibit A – FY 2025 OPSG Budget Worksheet in paragraph 2.9 (a), during the period of performance (POP) September 1, 2025 through May 31, 2028 but, the operational project period for PARTIES shall be the date of FEMA's approval, April 30, 2026 through February 29, 2028.

2.6 WHEREAS, PARTIES shall retain documentation supporting all expenditures reimbursed from OPSG grant funds, ensure all expenditures are allowable under grant requirements, adhere to the federal procurement standards found in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart D, Section § 200.317-§ 200.327, and comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements regarding organization-wide financial and compliance audit reports if $1,000,000 or more of OPSG federal funds are expended in a fiscal year.

2.6.1 Documentation shall be retained in accordance with the FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual and other OPSG grant requirements and shall be available for audit and inspection.

2.7 WHEREAS, PARTIES agree that this Agreement does not provide Federal authority to PARTIES to enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC).

2.8 WHEREAS, PARTIES acknowledge the following information for the OPSG grant program:
(a) Federal Grantor Agency: U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (b) Administrative Authority: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (c) Operational Oversight: U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (d) State Administrative Agency (SAA) or Pass-Through Agency: California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES)
(e) Program Title: Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)
(f) Grant Identification Number: 2025-5020
(g) Federal CFDA Number: 97.067

2.9 WHEREAS, PARTIES agree and shall utilize and adhere to the Exhibits attached hereto and/or available using the referenced links:

3 (a) Exhibit A – FY 2025 OPSG Budget Worksheet
(b) Exhibit B – FY 2025 OPSG Standard Assurances
(c) Exhibit C – FY 2025 OPSG - Required Federal Grant Provisions (d) Exhibit D - FY 2025 OPSG – Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form (e) Exhibit E – FY 2025 OPSG Operations Order
(f) Exhibit F – Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (g) Exhibit G – Appendix II Part 200
(Includes guidelines/directions to create/develop mandatory and/or recommended language to cover and address each required provision for incorporation within a contract)
(h) Exhibit H - FY 2025 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
(i) Exhibit I - FY 2025 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) California Supplement to the Federal Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) (j) Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual (PGM)
Nothing in the Exhibits above shall limit the requirements of this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, PARTIES jointly intend that COUNTY will reimburse, and PARTIES will provide, a level of OPSG services as set forth in this Agreement.

3. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of this Agreement is to satisfy the OPSG grant program proposal awarded by the DHS and passed through to Cal OES, under the FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden grant program.

4. SCOPE OF SERVICES

4.1 Method of Service Delivery
SHERIFF shall manage the OPSG grant program, oversee the funding allocation of PARTIES, and be administratively responsible for coordination of PARTIES' obligations under this Agreement. SHERIFF's OPSG grant program team will be staffed as described in paragraph 6. STANDARDS OF SERVICE: OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES.

4.2 Overview of Basic Services
PARTIES shall perform OPSG Operations ("Operations") by increasing law enforcement presence in each PARTY's designated jurisdiction and in coordination with other OPSG participating agencies to support the U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) efforts to improve border security in the region. PARTIES shall enforce local and state laws within their designated jurisdiction subject to the California Values Act (SB 54; Chapter 495) and shall not enforce or aid in the enforcement of immigration laws on behalf of U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U. S. Border Patrol (BP). This Agreement does not provide Federal authority to PARTIES to enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC).

4 5. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The OPSG grant program Period of Performance (POP) is September 1, 2025 through May 31, 2028, but the operational project period for PARTIES shall be the date of FEMA's approval, April 30, 2026 through February 29, 2028.

5.1 Initial Term
The term of this Agreement shall be retroactive to 12:01 a.m. on April 30, 2026 and shall continue in effect through and terminate at midnight on May 31, 2028; subject to the termination provision in paragraph 5.3.

5.2 Option to Extend
Renewal or extension of the Agreement beyond May 31, 2028 shall be subject to remaining grant funds and to a time extension approved by Cal OES. PARTIES that choose not to renew shall terminate its participation at the end of the term of this Agreement.

5.3 Termination
Subject to the applicable provisions of state law, each PARTY may terminate its participation in this Agreement upon ninety (90) days minimum written notice to the other PARTIES.

5.3.1 A PARTY may terminate its participation in this Agreement immediately upon written notice to the other PARTIES in the event it becomes ineligible to receive grant funds under this Agreement.

5.3.2 As the lead agency, SHERIFF, with approval from FEMA, CBP, and/or Cal OES as needed, may require the termination of a PARTY's participation if it is determined that the PARTY has violated the provisions of this Agreement, including failure to provide the Anticipated Outcome set forth in section 6.3.

6. STANDARDS OF SERVICE: OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES

6.1 Suspension and Debarment
SHERIFF will request, and PARTIES shall provide a copy of the SAM.gov report for their agency which shows their Active and Inactive Exclusions. Any PARTY with Active Exclusions at the onset of, or any time during, the term of this Agreement is not eligible to participate as set forth in Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR 200.214, and codified in 2 CFR Part 180, and shall terminate its participation in this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 5.3 Termination.

6.2 Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment
PARTIES that receive an award greater than $100,000 shall certify to SHERIFF on the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Certification Form attached hereto as Exhibit D, that it will not and has not used federally appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each

5 PARTY shall also disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from agency to agency up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certifications to the federal awarding agency.

6.3 Anticipated Outcome
The anticipated outcome of Operations to be performed by PARTIES under this Agreement is increased law enforcement presence in each PARTY's designated jurisdiction to support U. S. DHS and U. S. CBP efforts in the region to improve border security and reduce border related crime. The anticipated outcome will be reached by achieving the goals and accomplishing the missions set forth below by PARTIES and in Exhibit E – FY 2025 OPSG Operations Order.

6.3.1 PARTIES shall provide enhanced enforcement by increasing patrol presence in proximity to the border and/or routes of ingress from the border, including the water borders. In addition, PARTIES shall utilize their unique investigatory areas of expertise in operations.

6.3.2 Increased intelligence/information sharing among PARTIES, including but not limited to:
(a) Conducting bi-monthly meetings with a minimum of one representative from each PARTY.
(b) Increasing information sharing during operations.

6.3.3 Prior to Operations, PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator, in paragraph 6.4.3, shall submit an operational plan and schedule to the Integrated Planning Team (IPT) at least 72 hours prior to the operation.

6.3.3.1 The IPT is comprised of SHERIFF and CBP sworn personnel.

6.3.3.2 The role of the IPT is to provide support and guidance to the local, state, and federal law enforcement stakeholders within the grant.

6.3.4 Within 48 hours following the conclusion of each Operation:

6.3.4.1 Each PARTY shall complete an Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Activity Log (AL) form in Excel format, which will be submitted as supporting documentation for any reimbursement request. Information entered in the Narrative section of the OPSG AL form shall include statistical data and reports from Field Interviews (FIs), Arrest Reports, and/or Citations.

6.3.4.2 PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator in paragraph 6.4.3, or designee, shall enter and submit the same OPSG AL information directly into DHS's Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN).

6 6.3.4.3 PARTIES' Designated Operations Coordinator or designee shall ensure OPSG AL information entered in HSIN is correct and shall make necessary corrections until it is processed for approval.

6.4 Personnel Qualifications and Assignment

6.4.1 Qualifications
Each PARTY shall ensure that personnel assigned to perform Operations pursuant to this Agreement meet the minimum qualifications for their specific classification.

6.4.1.1 Personnel assigned to perform law enforcement activities in support of OPSG initiative to enhance border security must be peace officers who are certified to act as public safety officers, including but not limited to rangers, lifeguards, detectives, and investigators who work in a patrol capacity, along with assistance from other law enforcement direct support personnel such as communication officers/dispatchers and patrol pilots.

6.4.2 Management, Direction, and Supervision; Independent Contractors The hiring, firing, management, direction, and supervision of each PARTY's personnel, the standards of performance, the discipline of each PARTY's personnel, and all other matters incident to the performance of such services, shall be performed by and be the responsibility of each PARTY in each PARTY's sole but reasonable judgment and in accord with the provisions of applicable labor agreements. Each PARTY shall be the appointing authority for all its personnel provided to OPSG by this Agreement. PARTIES shall have no liability for any direct payment of salary, wages, indemnity, or other compensation or benefit to any other PARTY's personnel.

Each PARTY and its respective officers, agents, and employees are independent contractors and are not officers, agents, and employees of any other PARTY. Each PARTY's personnel are under the direct and exclusive supervision of that PARTY, and each PARTY assumes full responsibility for the performance of its own personnel in connection with this Agreement. No PARTY has the authority to bind any other PARTY.

6.4.3 Designated Operations Coordinators
SHERIFF shall select a Designated Operations Coordinator, at the rank of Sheriff's Lieutenant or higher, who shall manage and direct OPSG operations. All other PARTIES shall select a Designated Operations Coordinator for their respective agency under this Agreement. The Designated Operations Coordinator for each PARTY shall serve as their agency contact and shall implement, as needed, appropriate procedures governing the performance of all requirements under this Agreement and shall be responsible for meeting and conferring in good faith to address any disputes which may arise concerning implementation of this Agreement.

7 6.4.4 Staffing for Basic Services
PARTIES shall ensure that adequate numbers of their qualified respective personnel are always provided to Operations during the term of this Agreement to meet the Basic Services, Scope of Services, and Standards of Service commitments set forth herein.

6.4.5 Equipment and Supplies
COUNTY will provide SHERIFF OPSG personnel with all supplies and/or prescribed safety gear, body armor, and/or standard issue equipment necessary to perform Operations. Similarly, all other PARTIES will provide their respective OPSG personnel with all supplies and/or prescribed safety gear, body armor, and/or standard issue equipment necessary to perform Operations unless otherwise specified in Exhibit E - FY 2025 OPSG Operations Order.

6.4.5.1 PARTIES are responsible for the procurement of their own equipment to be used in Operations.

6.4.5.2 PARTIES shall maintain an inventory list of all equipment purchased with OPSG funds and when practicable, equipment shall be labeled with:
"Purchased with funds provided by the U. S. Department of Homeland Security".

7. COST OF SERVICES/CONSIDERATION

7.1 General

7.1.1 As full consideration for the satisfactory performance and completion by PARTIES of Operations set forth in this Agreement, COUNTY shall reimburse PARTIES for personnel assigned to perform Operations based on claims and submittals as set forth hereunder. Such payments by COUNTY are dependent on the continued availability of funds from the DHS passed through Cal OES.

7.1.2 PARTIES agree that awarded funds identified as allowable costs, as set forth in Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual (PGM), shall be expended only for approved Operations operating expenses and equipment as detailed in Exhibit A – FY 2025 OPSG Budget Worksheet, and that unallowable costs are not reimbursable as set forth in Exhibit J – FEMA PGM.

7.1.2.1 Law enforcement activities, such as operational overtime costs incurred by increased patrol operations, in support of enhanced border security will be performed by peace officers who are certified to act as public safety officers, as described in paragraph 6.4.1.1 of this Agreement.

7.1.2.2 Personnel assigned to perform Operations may not work an overtime shift that exceeds 16 hours worked in any 24-hour period.

8 7.1.2.3 Unallowable OPSG activities include but are not limited to, costs associated with evidence collection, arrest processing, prosecution and Traffic/DUI checkpoints, such as evidence documentation cameras, fingerprinting supplies, alcohol breathalyzers, traffic barricades, and similar law enforcement expenses. General IT computing equipment, construction and/or renovation expenses, as well as exercise program costs are also prohibited under OPSG.

7.1.3 No reimbursement shall be made to a PARTY during any period within which that PARTY is in default on filing any informational or financial reports required by SHERIFF. SHERIFF shall make any necessary adjustments to PARTY claims to correct for overpayments, underpayments, or disallowances.

7.2 Project Costs/Rate of Compensation
SHERIFF shall reimburse PARTIES for overtime worked by personnel assigned to perform Operations and shall reimburse for costs approved in Exhibit E – FY 2025 OPSG Operations Order, based upon available funding and the actual costs incurred by PARTIES to provide Operations.

7.3 Reimbursement Method
PARTIES shall submit to SHERIFF, accurate and complete reimbursement forms, labor reports, timesheets, OPSG ALs, equipment and equipment maintenance invoices, procurement documents, purchase orders and/or contracts, and proof of payment, that represent amounts to be reimbursed under this Agreement within ninety (90) days from the date when expenditure was incurred or, within thirty (30) days if expenditure is incurred on February 29, 2028. All requests for reimbursement shall be sent to:

San Diego County Sheriff's Office
O-41 Grants Unit (OPSG)
P. O. Box 939062
San Diego, CA 92193-9062

7.3.1 Reimbursement forms and invoices must have the signature of PARTY's Authorized Agent, certifying that the invoice and substantiating documentation, e.g., OPSG ALs, timesheets, payroll and labor reports, procurement documents, etc., are true and correct.

7.3.2 PARTIES shall provide payroll records for each person whose costs are reimbursable under this Agreement, to include, at a minimum, the person's name, classification, duty position, task, regular hourly rate, overtime hourly rate, overtime hours worked, date(s) overtime worked, and fringe benefit rate and cost.

7.3.2.1 PARTIES shall make available to SHERIFF for inspection, upon request, all payroll records and any other records that relate to the Basic Services provided under this Agreement.

9 7.3.3 PARTIES shall submit to SHERIFF, verifiable and complete supporting documentation to substantiate reimbursement requests for service maintenance and/or equipment purchase, to include the equipment inventory ledger, certified true copies of invoice, purchase order, proof of payment to vendor and other procurement documentation. Compliance with the disclosure requirements of this Agreement by any PARTY shall not otherwise waive Attorney-Client privilege or any other privilege or exemption.

7.3.3.1 PARTIES shall provide procurement records that show proof of compliance to 2 CFR § 200.317-§ 200.327 requirements, and documents that substantiate full and open competition, to include but not limited to, copies of solicitation (RFQ, RFB, RFP), rationale for the method of procurement, contract policy, basis for the contract type and price, purchase request, statement of work and other pre-solicitation documents, cost/price analysis (if applicable), profit negotiation (if applicable), purchase orders, federal contract provisions with required language incorporated within contracts under federal award (as directed herein by Exhibit G – Appendix II Part 200, notice of award, record of protest, performance or other bond documents, specialized endorsements and request form approvals (if applicable), suspension and debarment listing, etc.

7.3.3.2 PARTIES shall make available to SHERIFF for inspection and upon request, all procurement records that provide historical and background information to answer inquiries pertaining to the acquisition of service maintenance and/or equipment that may arise in a review or audit or until the grant record retention period expires.

7.3.4 PARTIES shall ensure awareness, understanding, and compliance with all grant rules and procurement requirements. PARTIES shall be responsible in making sure that proper authorizations are in place for any OPSG equipment purchase that requires specialized endorsement or approvals, including waiver request forms or Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) review and compliance.

7.3.5 Noncompetitive procurements of equipment exceeding the $350,000 Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) established by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48 CFR Subpart 2.1, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908, requires prior written approval from Cal OES.

7.3.5.1 Prior to purchasing equipment determined to be noncompetitive, PARTIES shall email SHERIFF a copy of their Purchasing Agent's approval for the noncompetitive procurement which SHERIFF will submit to Cal OES for approval.

7.3.6 PARTIES shall obtain a performance bond from vendors prior to procuring equipment over $350,000, or any vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft, regardless of contract amount, to be paid at the time of purchase, to ensure delivery of the equipment within ninety (90) days of the performance period end date.

10 7.3.6.1 Performance bond shall be included for reimbursement with invoice.

7.3.7 Within ninety (90) days of receipt of valid invoice and supporting documentation specified in subparagraphs under 7.3, SHERIFF will reimburse PARTIES for the Basic Services agreed to.

7.3.8 Each PARTY shall manage their allocation and track their claims to remain within their allocated amount as specified in Exhibit A – FY 2025 OPSG Budget Worksheet.

7.4 Reimbursement Disallowances
PARTIES not in compliance with procedures in paragraph 7.3 above risk having incurred expenditures disallowed for reimbursement by SHERIFF. PARTIES that fail to submit claims for reimbursement within ninety (90) days will be notified in writing by SHERIFF that the claim(s) is/are past due, and funds allocated to the PARTY for that period may be redistributed among other PARTIES.

8. PROGRAM/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION

8.1 PARTIES shall use as the primary reference in all programmatic, financial, and grant administration matters and adhere to the policies and regulations in Exhibit F - Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR Part 200), Exhibit H – FY 2025 HSGP NOFO, Exhibit I – FY 2025 HSGP CA Supplement to the NOFO and Exhibit J – FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual, in conjunction with updates issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Grants & Training (G&T) information bulletins, and Cal OES policy, regulations, and statutes.

8.1.1 Contract Provisions
PARTIES shall ensure that all contracts adhere to all applicable procurement rules and regulations stated in 2 CFR § 200.317-§ 200.327 and described in Appendix II Part 200 - Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts under Federal Awards. Reimbursement claims associated with contracts found to be out of compliance will be denied.

8.1.2 Methods of Procurement
PARTIES shall adhere to the procurement methods found in 2 CFR 200, Subpart D, § 200.320.

8.1.3 Grant Requirements
PARTIES shall comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. 200 Subpart D, including requiring their contractors to comply with the applicable Federal Requirements contained in Exhibit C hereto.

11 9. REPAYMENT OF REIMBURSEMENTS

9.1 Any PARTY found through compliance assessments, audits, or monitoring site visits, to be out of compliance with paragraphs 7.3 and 8 above, shall retroactively repay SHERIFF, within ninety (90) days of notification, any reimbursement found out of compliance which was paid to PARTY during the term of, and even after the term, of this Agreement. This provision shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

10. INDEMNIFICATION – WORKERS' COMPENSATION, EMPLOYMENT AND

CLAIMS AND LIABILITY ISSUES

10.1 The COUNTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless non-County PARTIES and their respective officers, employees and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs and/or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of the COUNTY or any contract labor provider retained by the COUNTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or other such matters) which is brought by an employee of the COUNTY or any contract labor provider retained by the COUNTY.

10.2 Each non-County PARTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officers, employees, and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by non-County PARTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or other such matters) which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by the non-County PARTY.

10.3 Each non-County PARTY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless the other nonCounty PARTIES, its officers, employees, and agents, from any claims, losses, fines, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs or arbitration costs), costs, damages or liabilities arising from or related to (1) any workers' compensation claim or demand or other workers' compensation proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, employment which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by non-County PARTY, or (2) any claim, demand, suit, or other proceeding arising from or related to, or claimed to arise from or relate to, the status of employment (including without limitation, compensation, demotion, promotion, discipline, termination, hiring, work assignment, transfer, disability, leave or

12 other such matters) which is brought by an employee of that respective non-County PARTY or any contract labor provider retained by the non-County PARTY.

11. INDEMNIFICATION RELATED TO ACTS OR OMISSIONS; NEGLIGENCE

11.1 Claims Arising from Sole Acts or Omissions of a PARTY Each PARTY to this Agreement hereby agrees to defend and indemnify the other PARTIES to this Agreement, their agents, officers, and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding against the other PARTIES, arising solely out of its own acts or omissions in the performance of this Agreement. At each PARTY's sole discretion, each PARTY may participate at its own expense in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, but such participation shall not relieve any PARTY of any obligation imposed by this Agreement.

PARTIES shall notify each other promptly of any claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense.

11.2 Claims Arising from Concurrent Acts or Omissions
The PARTIES hereby agree to defend themselves from any claim, action, or proceeding arising out of the concurrent acts or omissions of the PARTIES. In such cases, PARTIES agree to retain their own legal counsel, bear their own defense costs, and waive their right to seek reimbursement of such costs, except as provided in paragraph 11.4 below.

11.3 Joint Defense
Notwithstanding paragraph 11.2 above, in cases where PARTIES agree in writing to a joint defense, PARTIES may appoint joint defense counsel to defend the claim, action, or proceeding arising out of the concurrent acts or omissions of PARTIES. Joint defense counsel shall be selected by mutual agreement of PARTIES. PARTIES agree to share the costs of such joint defense and any agreed settlement in equal amounts, except as provided in paragraph 11.4 below. PARTIES further agree that no PARTY may bind the others to a settlement agreement without the written consent of the others.

11.4 Reimbursement and/or Reallocation
Where a trial verdict or arbitration award allocates or determines the comparative fault of the parties, PARTIES may seek reimbursement and/or reallocation of defense costs, settlement payments, judgments, and awards, consistent with such comparative fault.

12. GENERAL PROVISIONS

12.1 Notices
Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and may be personally delivered or given as of the date of mailing by depositing such notice in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid and addressed as follows, or, to such other place as each PARTY may designate by subsequent written notice to each other:

13 To SHERIFF:

Sheriff
San Diego County Sheriff's Office
P. O. Box 939062
San Diego, CA 92193-9062
To Non-County PARTIES:

Chief Chief
Carlsbad Police Department Chula Vista Police Department 2560 Orion Way 315 Fourth Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92010 Chula Vista, CA 91910
Chief Chief
El Cajon Police Department Escondido Police Department
100 Civic Center Way 1163 North Centre City Parkway
El Cajon, CA 92020 Escondido, CA 92026
Chief Chief
La Mesa Police Department Oceanside Police Department
8085 University Avenue 3855 Mission Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942 Oceanside, CA 92058
Chief Chief
San Diego Harbor Police Department Port Hueneme Police Department 3380 North Harbor Drive 250 N Ventura Road
San Diego, CA 91101 Port Hueneme, CA 93041

Sheriff Sheriff
Orange County Sheriff's Department Ventura County Sheriff's Office 550 North Flower Street 800 South Victoria Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92703 Ventura, CA 93009
Sheriff Sheriff
San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office Monterey County Sheriff's Office 1585 Kansas Avenue 1414 Natividad Road
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Salinas, CA 93906
Sheriff Sheriff
Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office San Mateo County Sheriff's Office 4434 Calle Real 330 Bradford Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Redwood City, CA 94063

14 Chief Chief
California Highway Patrol California Department of
Border Division Fish and Wildlife
9330 Farnham Street Law Enforcement Division
San Diego, CA 92123 715 P Street, #11-119
Sacramento, CA 95814

Chief
California Department of
Parks and Recreation
P.O. Box 942896
Sacramento, CA 94296-0001
A notice shall be effective on the date of personal delivery if personally delivered before 5:00 p.m. on a business day or otherwise on the first business day following personal delivery; or two (2) business days following the date the notice is postmarked, if mailed; or on the first business day following delivery to the applicable overnight courier, if sent by overnight courier for next business day delivery and otherwise when received.

12.2 Amendment; Assignment
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document signed by the COUNTY through SHERIFF and the affected PARTY or PARTIES, and no oral understanding or agreement shall be binding on any PARTY or PARTIES. No PARTY shall assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other PARTIES.

12.3 Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of agreement among the COUNTY and non-County PARTIES with respect to the subject matter hereto. As such, all prior written and oral understandings are superseded in total by this Agreement.

12.4 Construction
This Agreement will be deemed to have been made and shall be construed, interpreted, governed, and enforced pursuant to, and in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. The headings and captions used in this Agreement are for convenience and ease of reference only and shall not be used to construe, interpret, expand, or limit the terms of the Agreement and shall not be construed against any one PARTY.

12.5 Waiver
A waiver by COUNTY or non-County PARTIES of a breach of any of the covenants to be performed by COUNTY or non-County PARTIES shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions, or conditions of this Agreement. In addition, the failure of any PARTY to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of any right to do so, whether for that breach or any subsequent breach. The acceptance by COUNTY or nonPage 50 of 218 15 County PARTIES of either performance or payment shall not be considered a waiver of PARTY's preceding breach of this Agreement.

12.6 Authority to Enter Agreement
COUNTY and non-County PARTIES have all requisite power and authority to conduct their respective business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each PARTY warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective PARTY.

12.7 Cooperation
COUNTY through SHERIFF and Non-County PARTIES will cooperate in good faith to implement this Agreement.

12.8 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. SHERIFF will provide each PARTY with a copy of this Agreement once fully executed.

12.9 Severability
This Agreement is subject to all applicable laws and regulations. If any provision of this Agreement is found by any court or other legal authority, or is agreed upon by the PARTIES, to conflict with any law or regulation, then the conflicting provision shall be considered null and void. If the effect of nullifying any conflicting provision is such that a material benefit of this Agreement to any PARTY is lost, then the Agreement may be terminated at the option of the affected PARTY, with the notice as required in this Agreement. In all other cases, the remainder of this Agreement shall be severable and shall continue in full force and effect.

12.10 Legislative Changes
If any changes are made to regulations pursuant to which this Agreement is made or to any successor legislation or regulations, or if the U. S. DHS imposes any budget requirements or limitations applicable to this Agreement and the services to be provided hereunder, then (1) to the extent any of the changes are of mandatory application, such change(s) shall apply to the PARTIES in this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be amended to be consistent with such changes(s) except to the extent that such change(s) alter(s) a material provision of this Agreement in which case such material provision shall be voidable and the PARTIES will negotiate in good faith to amend the Agreement as necessary, and (2) to the extent any of the changes are not of mandatory application, such change(s) shall not affect this Agreement or the right or obligations of COUNTY and non-COUNTY under this Agreement unless the PARTIES mutually agree to subject themselves to such changes(s).

12.11 Representation
Each PARTY’s Chief, and/or Sheriff, or their respective designee, shall represent its PARTY in all discussions pertaining to this Agreement. SHERIFF, or his or her designee, shall represent COUNTY in all discussions pertaining to this Agreement.

16 12.12 Dispute Resolution Concerning Services and Payment In the event of any dispute concerning services and payment arising from this Agreement, representatives described in paragraph 12.11, will meet, and confer within ten (10) business days after receiving notice of the dispute to resolve the dispute.

12.13 Termination of Funding
If funding for reimbursement of costs related to Operations is terminated by the U. S.

DHS, this Agreement in its entirety shall be considered null and void and COUNTY through SHERIFF and PARTIES shall no longer be required to provide Operations as described herein. In such event, PARTIES shall meet immediately, and if agreed upon by the PARTIES, mutually develop and implement within a reasonable time frame, a transition plan for the provision of Operations through alternate means.

12.14 Obligation
This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors of the PARTIES.

12.15 California Law
This Agreement is executed and delivered within the State of California, and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES hereto shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto approve and agree to the terms of this Agreement, such Agreement being effective April 30, 2026, unless otherwise specified.

Approved as to form and legality:

SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

SHERIFF'S OFFICE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

___________________________ _____________________________ Kelly A. Martinez Mark Day
Sheriff Senior Deputy

CARLSBAD POLICE CHULA VISTA POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _____________________________ Christie Calderwood Dan Peak
Chief Acting Chief

17 EL CAJON POLICE ESCONDIDO POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _____________________________ Jeremiah Larson Ken Plunkett
Chief Chief

LA MESA POLICE OCEANSIDE POLICE

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT
___________________________ _________________________________ Ray Sweeney Taurino Valdovinos
Chief Chief

SAN DIEGO HARBOR POLICE PORT HUENEME

DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
___________________________ ___________________________ Magda Fernandez Michael Federico
Chief Chief
Approved as to form and legality:

ORANGE COUNTY LEON J. PAGE

SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

COUNTY OF ORANGE
___________________________ ___________________________ Don Barnes Annie Loo
Sheriff-Coroner Senior Deputy

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY VENTURA COUNTY

SHERIFF'S OFFICE SHERIFF'S OFFICE

___________________________ ___________________________ Ian Parkinson James Fryhoff
Sheriff Sheriff

18 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MONTEREY COUNTY

SHERIFF'S OFFICE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
___________________________ ___________________________ Bill Brown Tina Nieto
Sheriff-Coroner Sheriff-Coroner

SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

SHERIFF'S OFFICE BORDER DIVISION
___________________________ ___________________________ Kenneth Binder Brandon Shipwash
Sheriff Chief

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF FISH AND WILDLIFE OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
___________________________ ___________________________ Amy Mowrer Lisa Adams
Chief District Superintendent
Business Management Branch

FY 2025 OPERATION STONEGARDEN

ANNUAL BUDGET WORKSHEET

SUMMARY

A B C D E FGH I
AGENCY NAME Operational OT Fringe Benefits Vehicle/Vessel Maint Equip Maint New/Replace Equip Fuel Costs Mileage Flight Costs M&A TOTAL San Diego County Sheriff's Office 198,190 3,014,743 - 55,710 440,000 - 263,786 55,156 322,715 4,350,300Carlsbad Police Department 411 28,329 - - - - 1,260 - - 30,000Chula Vista Police Department 1,143 78,857 - - - - - - - 80,000El Cajon Police Department 5,795 142,440 - - - - 1,765 - - 150,000Escondido Police Department - 10,000 - - - - - - - 10,000La Mesa Police Department 12,056 157,600 - - 125,000 - 5,344 - - 300,000Oceanside Police Department 1,478 101,948 23,574 - - 23,000 - - - 150,000San Diego Harbor Police Department 13,143 70,019 17,000 - - 22,464 2,374 - - 125,000Port Hueneme Police Department - 40,000 - - - - - - - 40,000Orange County Sheriff’s Department 28,591 295,970 39,279 - - 24,960 11,200 - - 400,000San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office 18,231 74,810 - - 29,700 - 6,959 - - 129,700Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office - 127,418 12,880 - - 38,400 5,682 15,620 - 200,000Ventura County Sheriff's Office - 322,819 15,614 - - 25,575 - 35,992 - 400,000Monterey County Sheriff's Office 1,072 73,945 - - 95,000 - 4,983 - - 175,000San Mateo County Sheriff's Office 5,245 44,755 - - - - - - - 50,000CA Highway Patrol 7,434 512,705 - - - - 39,031 40,830 - 600,000CA Department of Fish and Wildlife 429 29,571 - - - - - - - 30,000CA Department of Parks and Recreation 1,366 94,206 16,004 - 60,000 4,896 3,528 - - 180,000 Grand Total San Diego County Region 5,220,13 $ 294,58 5 $ 124,351 4 $ 55,710 $ 749,700 $ 139,29 $ 345,912 5 $ 147,598 $ 322,71 $ 7,400,000 5 $ Budget Narrative Category

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 1 of 11 Initials _______

EXHIBIT B
Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) FY 2025 OPSG Standard Assurances
(All OPSG Participating Agencies of Friendly Forces)
Name of Agency: ___________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ City: _____________________________________ State: ______________ Zip Code: ______________ As the duly authorized representative of the Agency ("Agency") named above, I hereby certify that:
• The Agency has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and has the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including sufficient funds to pay any non-federal share of project cost or to retroactively repay any reimbursement found out of compliance which was paid to Agency, for as long as the grant is active) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application, within prescribed timelines.
• The Agency, and any of its principals, contractors, and subcontractors, will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal statutes, including but not limited to the following state and federal statutes prohibiting hate-based conduct:
(a) California Penal Code section 422.6 (a);
(b) California Penal Code section 404.6;
(c) California Penal Code section 422 (a);
(d) California Civil Code section 52.1;
(e) 18 U.S.C. § 249;
(f) 42 U.S.C. § 3631;
(g) 18 U.S.C. § 247; and
(h) 18 U.S.C. § 241, 245
Additionally, the Agency will not engage, and certifies that it will take steps to ensure that its principals, contractors, and subcontractors do not engage in conduct contrary to the purposes of the grant program and/or that threatens the safety and security of Californians, including, but not limited to, acts of violence or unlawful intimidation on the basis of race, gender, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or other protected classifications. Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to, violation of the federal and state laws identified herein.

The requirements outlined in these assurances apply to the Agency and any of its principals, contractors, and subcontractors.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 2 of 11 Initials _______ I further acknowledge that the Agency is responsible for reviewing and adhering to all requirements within the:
(a) Applicable Federal and State Regulations;
(b) Federal Program Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)*; (c) Federal Preparedness Grants Manual;
(d) California State Supplement to the NOFO
*All instructions, guidance, limitations, scope of work, and other conditions set forth in the NOFO are incorporated by reference in the federal award. All grant recipients, including the Agency, contractors and subcontractors, must comply with any such requirements set forth in the NOFO. If a condition of the NOFO is inconsistent with the grant terms and conditions and any such terms of the federal award, the condition in the NOFO shall be invalid to the extent of the inconsistency. The remainder of that condition and all other conditions set forth in the NOFO shall remain in effect.

The Agency is encouraged to consult with its counsel prior to signing and submitting these Standard Assurances when accepting its grant award allocation.

Federal Regulations
Government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements, and audit requirements for federal grant programs are set forth in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) and adopted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at 2 C.F.R. §3002.10. Updates are issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/.

For necessary changes made to the subaward, including changes to the period of performance or terms and conditions, Agency will be notified of the changes in writing. Once notification has been made, any subsequent request for funds will indicate Agency acceptance of the changes to the subaward.

State and federal grant award requirements are set forth below. The Agency hereby agrees to comply with the following:

1. Proof of Authority
The Agency will obtain proof of authority from the city council, governing board or authorized body in support of this project. This written authorization must specify that the Agency and the city council, governing board or authorized body agree:
(a) To provide all matching funds required for the grant project and that any cash match will be appropriated as required;
(b) Any liability arising out of the performance of this agreement shall be the responsibility of the Agency and the city council, governing board or authorized body; (c) Grant funds shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by the city council, governing board or authorized body;
(d) The Agency is authorized by the city council, governing body, or authorized body to apply for federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-federal share of project cost, if any, or to retroactively repay any reimbursement found out of compliance, which was paid to Agency, for as long as the grant is active) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application; and (e) The official executing this agreement is authorized by the Agency.

This Proof of Authority must be maintained on file and readily available upon request.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 3 of 11 Initials _______

2. Period of Performance and Operational Project Period The period of performance is specified in the Award and the operational project period for the Agency is indicated in the FY2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The Agency is only authorized to perform allowable activities approved under the award, within the period of performance specified in the grant, within which, the operational project period for the Agency is enforced.

3. Lobbying and Political Activities
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.), for persons entering into a contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement from an agency or requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the Agency certifies that:
(a) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (b) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying”, in accordance with its instructions. (c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all grant recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

The Agency will also comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and §§7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds.

Finally, the Agency agrees that federal funds will not be used, directly or indirectly, to support the enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy without the express written approval from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) or the federal awarding agency.

4. Debarment and Suspension
As required by Executive Orders (EO) 12549 and 12689, and 2 C.F.R §200.214 and codified in 2 C.F.R Part 180, Debarment and Suspension, the Agency will provide protection against waste, fraud and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the federal government. The Agency certifies that it and its principals, contractors, or subcontractors:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (4)(b) of this certification; and

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 4 of 11 Initials _______ (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

Where the Agency is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application.

5. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity
The Agency will comply with all state and federal statutes and regulations relating to non-discrimination, including:
(a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law (P.L.) 88-352 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin and requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded educational program or activity, as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R § 19 for awards issued by FEMA;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination against those with disabilities or access and functional needs in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance;
(d) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, and requires buildings and structures be accessible to those with disabilities and access and functional needs;
(e) Age Discrimination Act of 1975, (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance; (f) Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd --- 2), relating to confidentiality of patient records regarding substance abuse treatment;
(g) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing as implemented by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R § 100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units --- i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units (all units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators) --- be designed and constructed with certain accessible features (See 24 C.F.R § 100.201);
(h) California Public Contract Code § 10295.3, which prohibits discrimination based on domestic partnerships and those in same sex marriages;
(i) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations, under which the Agency must comply with equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R. § 19;
(j) The California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (California Government Code § 12940 – 12957), as applicable. FEHA prohibits harassment and discrimination in employment because of ancestry, familial status, race, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, mental and physical disability, genetic information, medical condition, age, pregnancy, denial of medical and family care leave, or pregnancy disability leave, military and veteran status, and/or retaliation for protesting illegal discrimination related to one of these categories, or for reporting patient abuse in tax supported institutions; (k) Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made; and
(l) The requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 5 of 11 Initials _______ Civil Rights Policies for Program Beneficiaries and Subrecipients of DHS funding, pertaining to the following are available on the Cal OES website:
• Non-discrimination in Programs & Services
• Reasonable Accommodation for Program Beneficiaries
• Language Access Policy

6. Anti-Discrimination
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) included the following provisions for FY 2025 grant awards:

The Agency must comply with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of 31 U.S.C. § 372(b)(4).
(1) Definitions. As used in this clause –
(a) DEI means “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
(b) DEIA means “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.” (c) Discriminatory equity ideology has the meaning set forth in Section 2(b) of Executive Order 14190 of January 29, 2025.
(d) Federal anti-discrimination laws mean Federal civil rights law that protect individual Americans from discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, and national origin. (e) Illegal immigrant means any alien, as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3), who has no lawful immigration status in the United States.
(2) Grant award certification.

By accepting the grant award, the Agency is certifying that:
(i) It does not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI, DEIA, or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal antidiscrimination laws; and (ii) It does not engage in and will not during the term of this award engage in, a discriminatory prohibited boycott.

7. Drug-Free Workplace
As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.), the Agency certifies that it will maintain a drug-free workplace and a drug-free awareness program as outlined in the Act.

8. Environmental Standards
The Agency will comply with State and Federal environmental standards, including:
(a) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177), to include coordination with the city or county planning agency; (b) CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, §§ 15000-15387); (c) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), which establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters;
(d) Federal Clean Air Act of 1955 (42 U.S.C. § 7401), which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources;
(e) Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (P.L. 91-190); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA;
(f) Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 11988;

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 6 of 11 Initials _______ (g) Executive Order (EO) 11738 instituted to assure that each federal agency empowered to enter into contracts for the procurement of goods, materials, or services and each federal agency empowered to extend federal assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract shall undertake such procurement and assistance activities in a manner that will result in effective enforcement of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Executive Order (EO) 11990 which requires preservation of wetlands;
(h) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, (P.L. 93-523); (i) The Endangered Species Act of 1973, (P.L. 93-205);
(j) Assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.); (k) Conformity of Federal Actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.); and (l) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.

The Agency shall not be: 1) in violation of any order or resolution promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution district; 2) subject to a cease-and-desist order pursuant to § 13301 of the California Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or 3) determined to be in violation of federal law relating to air or water pollution.

9. Audits
For grant recipients expending $1,000,000 or more in federal grant funds annually, the Agency will perform the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and C.F.R., § 200, Subpart F Audit Requirements.

10. Cooperation and Access to Records
The Agency must cooperate with any compliance reviews or investigations conducted by DHS. In accordance with 2 C.F.R § 200.337, the Agency will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award.

The Agency will require any grant recipients, contractors, successors, transferees and assignees to acknowledge and agree to comply with this provision.

11. Conflict of Interest
The Agency will establish safeguards to prohibit the Agency's employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.

12. Financial Management
False Claims for Payment - The Agency will comply with 31 U.S.C § 3729-3733 which provides that Agency shall not submit a false claim for payment, reimbursement or advance.

13. Reporting - Accountability
The Agency agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (P.L. 109-282), including but not limited to (a) the reporting of subawards obligating $30,000 or more in federal funds, and (b) executive compensation data for first tier subawards as set forth in 2 C.F.R. § 170, Appendix A. The Agency also agrees to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide financial assistance award term regarding the System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements located at 2 C.F.R. § 25, Appendix A.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 7 of 11 Initials _______

14. Whistleblower Protections
The Agency must comply with statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. § 2324, 10 U.S.C. § 2409, 41 U.S.C. § 4304 and § 4310, and 41 U.S.C. § 4712.

15. Human Trafficking
The Agency will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104) which prohibits the Agency or its grant recipients from: (1) engaging in trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect; (2) procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or (3) using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.

16. Labor Standards
The Agency will comply with the following federal labor standards:
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-7), as applicable, and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145 and 18 U.S.C. § 874) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction contracts or subcontracts, and (b) The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.) as they apply to employees of institutes of higher learning (IHE), hospitals and other non-profit organizations.

17. Worker’s Compensation
The Agency must comply with provisions which require every employer to be insured to protect workers who may be injured on the job at all times during the performance of the work of this Agreement, as per the workers compensation laws set forth in California Labor Code §§ 3700 et seq.

18. Property-Related
If applicable to the type of project funded by this federal award, the Agency will:
(a) Comply with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally assisted programs.

These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchase;
(b) Comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires federal grant recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more;
(c) Assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470), Executive Order (EO) 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1 et seq.); and
(d) Comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4831 and 24 C.F.R. § 35) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

19. Certifications Applicable Only to Federally Funded Construction Projects For all construction projects, the Agency will:
(a) Not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the federal awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project;

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 8 of 11 Initials _______ (b) Comply with the requirements of the awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications; and
(c) Provide and maintain competent and adequate engineering supervision at the construction site to ensure that the complete work conforms to the approved plans and specifications and will furnish progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State.

20. Use of Cellular Device While Driving is Prohibited
The Agency is required to comply with California Vehicle Code Sections 23123 and 23123.5. These laws prohibit driving motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication. Drivers are also prohibited from the use of a wireless telephone without hands-free listening and talking, unless to make an emergency call to 911, law enforcement, or similar services.

21. California Public Records Act and Freedom of Information Act The Agency acknowledges that all information submitted in the course of applying for funding under this program, or provided in the course of an entity’s grant management activities that are under Federal control, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the California Public Records Act, California Government Code § 7920.000 et seq. The Agency should consider these laws and consult its own State and local laws and regulations regarding the release of information when reporting sensitive matters in the grant application, needs assessment, and strategic planning process.

22. Acknowledgement of Federal Funding from DHS
The Agency must acknowledge its use of federal funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposal, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

23. Activities Conducted Abroad
The Agency must coordinate with appropriate government authorities when performing project activities outside the United States and obtain all appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals.

24. Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) DHS defines personally identifiable information (PII) as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual. If the Agency collects PII, the Agency is required to have a publicly available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of PII it collects. The Agency may refer to the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments:

Privacy Guidance and Privacy template a useful resource.

25. Copyright
The Agency must affix the applicable copyright notices of 17 U.S.C. §§ 401 or 402 to any work first produced under Federal awards and also include an acknowledgement that the work was produced under a federal award (including the Federal Award Number and Federal Awarding Agency). As detailed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.315, a Federal Awarding Agency reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for Federal purposes and to authorize others to do so.

26. Duplicative Costs
Agency is prohibited from charging any cost to this federal award that will be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federal award in either the current or a prior budget period. (See 2 C.F.R. § 200.403(f)). However, the Agency may shift costs that are allowable under two or more awards where otherwise permitted by Federal statutes, regulations, or the Federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.

27. Energy Policy and Conservation Act
The Agency must comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6201 which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 9 of 11 Initials _______

28. Federal Debt Status
The Agency is required to be non-delinquent in its repayment of any Federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. See OMB Circular A-129.

29. Fly America Act of 1974
The Agency must comply with Preference for United States Flag Air Carriers: (a list of certified air carriers can be found at: Certified Air Carriers List | US Department of Transportation, https://www.transportation.gov/policy/aviationpolicy/certificated-air-carriers-list) for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. § 40118) and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in the March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B-138942.

30. Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
In accordance with Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, the Agency must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space funded in whole or in part with Federal funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.

31. Non-supplanting Requirement
If the Agency receives Federal financial assistance awards made under programs that prohibit supplanting by law, the Agency must ensure that Federal funds do not replace (supplant) funds that have been budgeted for the same purpose through non-federal sources.

32. Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
The Agency is subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. and applicable regulations governing inventions and patents, including the regulations issued by the Department of Commerce at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 (Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Awards, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements) and the standard patent rights clause set forth at 37 C.F.R. § 401.14.

33. SAFECOM
If the Agency receives Federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communication equipment and its related activities, the Agency must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications.

34. Terrorist Financing
The Agency must comply with Executive Order (EO) 13224 and United States law that prohibit transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. The Agency is legally responsible for ensuring compliance with the EO and laws.

35. Reporting of Matters Related to Subrecipient Integrity and Performance If the total value of the Agency's currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all Federal assistance offices exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of this Federal financial assistance award, the Agency must comply with the requirements set forth in the governmentwide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. § 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference in the award terms and conditions.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 10 of 11 Initials _______

36. USA Patriot Act of 2001
The Agency must comply with the requirements of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 175- 175c.

37. Use of DHS Seal, Logo, and Flags
The Agency must obtain written permission from DHS prior to using the DHS seals, logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials. This includes use of DHS component (e.g., FEMA, CISA, etc.) seals, logos, crests or reproductions of flags or likenesses of component officials.

38. Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes The DHS Standard Terms and Conditions are a restatement of general requirements imposed upon the Agency and flow down to sub tier grant recipients and contractors as a matter of law, regulation, or executive order. If the requirement does not apply to Indian tribes or there is a federal law or regulation exempting its application to Indian tribes, then the acceptance by Tribes of, or acquiescence to, DHS Standard Terms and Conditions does not change or alter its inapplicability to an Indian tribe. The execution of grant documents is not intended to change, alter, amend, or impose additional liability or responsibility upon the Tribe where it does not already exist.

39. Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials The Agency must comply with the "Build America, Buy America" Act (BABAA), enacted as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Executive Order (EO) 14005. Agencies receiving a federal award subject to BABAA requirements may not use Federal financial assistance funds for infrastructure projects unless:
(a) All iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States – this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States;
(b) All manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States – this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and
(c) All construction materials are manufactured in the United States – this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States.

The "Buy America" preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. It does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project.

Nor does a "Buy America" preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desk, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project.

Per Section 70914(c) of BABAA, FEMA may waive the application of a "Buy America" preference under an infrastructure program in certain cases.

40. Presidential Executive Orders
DHS included the following provision for FY 2025 grant awards:

The Agency must comply with the requirements of Presidential Executive Orders related to grants (also known as Federal Assistance and Financial Assistance) and are incorporated by reference.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant - Standard Assurances Page 11 of 11 Initials _______

41. Limited Waiver of Sovereign Immunity by Federally Recognized California Indian Tribe The Agency and any of the grant recipients, contractors and subcontractors recognize nothing outlined in these assurances shall be constructed as consent by any Federally recognized California Indian tribe to be bound by the laws of the State of California or the laws of the United States to which the Federally recognized California Indian tribe is not bound, except as expressly agreed herein. This limited waiver of sovereign immunity shall be strictly construed.

IMPORTANT
The purpose of the assurance is to obtain Federal and State financial assistance, including any and all Federal and State grants, loans, reimbursement, contracts, etc. The Agency recognizes and agrees that state financial assistance will be extended based on the representations made in these assurances. These assurances are binding on the Agency, its successors, transferees, assignees, etc. as well as any of its principals, contractors, and subcontractors. Failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination, or reduction of grant funds.

All appropriate documentation, as outlined above, must be maintained on file by the Agency and available for Cal OES or public scrutiny upon request. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the grant or termination of the grant or both and the Agency may be ineligible for award of any future grants if Cal OES determines that the Agency: (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

All of the language contained within this document must be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers. The Agency is encouraged to consult with its counsel prior to signing and submitting these Standard Assurances when accepting its grant award allocation.

The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the above-named Agency. The Agency understands that failure to comply with any of the assurances may result in suspension, termination, reduction, or de-obligation of funding. The Agency agrees to repay funds in the event there is a violation of grant assurances.

Name of Agency:

Signature of Authorized Agent:

Printed Name of Authorized Agent:

Title: Date:

Email Address: ____________________________________________________________

EXHIBIT C
Homeland Security Grant Program – FY2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG)

REQUIRED FEDERAL GRANT PROVISIONS

1. Termination for Default.

In the event of Contractor's breach of this Agreement, County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in whole or in part.
(a) Prior to termination for default, Contracting Officer will send Contractor written notice specifying the default.

Contractor shall have ten (10) days from issuance (unless a different time is given in the notice) to respond to the notice as directed by County to acknowledge the default or show cause as to why Contractor is not in default. Such notice may provide Contractor the opportunity to cure the default or to demonstrate progress towards curing the default. If Contractor fails to respond, or if Contractor’s response is not satisfactory to the County, County may terminate this Agreement for default upon written notice from Contracting Officer. (b) If County determines that the default contributes to the curtailment of an essential service; poses an immediate threat to life, health, or property; or constitutes fraud or other serious misconduct, County may terminate this Agreement for default by written notice from the Contracting Officer. (c) In the event of termination for default, all finished or unfinished documents, and other materials, prepared by Contractor under this Agreement shall become the sole and exclusive property of County. (d) If, after termination for default, it is determined for any reason that Contractor was not in default under this Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if terminated for convenience under section 2. “Termination for Convenience.”

2. Termination for Convenience.

The County may, by written notice from Contracting Officer, terminate this Agreement for convenience, in whole or in part, at any time. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor shall promptly report to County all undelivered or unaccepted work performed in accordance with this Agreement prior to termination (“Incomplete Work”).

Contractor may, at County’s option, be required to complete some or all Incomplete Work during disentanglement. (a) The County shall pay Contractor as full compensation for work performed and costs of termination:
i. The unit or pro rata price for any delivered and accepted portion of the work. ii. Actual and reasonable Contractor costs for Incomplete Work not mitigable or otherwise recoverable by Contractor. Such compensation shall not exceed the unit or pro rata price due to Contractor had the work been completed.
(b) In no event shall the County be liable for any loss of profits or any other consequential damages. (c) County's termination of this Agreement for convenience shall not preclude it from changing the termination to a default, as set forth in section 1. of this Agreement, nor from taking any action in law or equity against Contractor for:
i. Fraud, waste, or abuse of Agreement funds, or
ii. Improperly submitted claims, or

iii. Any failure to perform the work in accordance with the Statement of Work, or iv. Any breach of any terms or conditions of the Agreement, or v. Any actions under any warranty, express or implied, or vi. Any claim of unprofessional negligence, or
vii. Any other matter arising from or related to this Agreement, whether know, knowable, or unknown before, during, or after the date of termination.

3. Equal Opportunity.

Contractor shall comply with Federal and State equal employment opportunity laws, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in that it will not discriminate against any individual with respect to his or her compensation terms, conditions or privileges of employment nor shall Contractor discriminate in any way that would deprive or intend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his or her status as an employee because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status.

4. Davis-Bacon Act. [for construction contracts more than $2,000] Work to be performed by Contractor in accordance with this Agreement is a “public work” under Labor Code section 1720, et seq. and is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the California Department of Industrial Relations. If Contractor will receive federal funds, this Agreement may also be subject to the payment of prevailing wages pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 USC § 3141 et seq., and other federal laws. It is the sole responsibility of Contractor to ensure that all workers who perform work pursuant to this Agreement are paid the correct rate of prevailing wages. Contractor waives and releases any rights it may have under Labor Code section 1726 and 1781 to seek recovery of costs from the County. When working on a federally funded project, Contractor shall ensure that all workers entitled to the payment of prevailing wages receive the higher of the applicable State or federal prevailing wage.

County has obtained from the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations general prevailing wage determinations for the locality in which work is being performed. These determinations are on file and available in the Department of Purchasing and Contracting, 5560 Overland Avenue, Suite 270, San Diego, CA 92123, and are available from the Department of Industrial Relations on the internet at www.dir.ca.gov. Federal prevailing wage rates are available from the U.S. Department of Labor on the internet at www.access.gpo.gov.

Contractor acknowledges that because portions of the work to be performed by Contractor may be subject to the payment of State and federal prevailing wages, certain requirements must be included in this Agreement. Contractor certifies that it is generally aware of State and federal prevailing wage requirements and shall be bound by these requirements to the extent applicable to the work performed, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) If a worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rate owed for a day or portion of a day, Contractor shall pay the worker the difference between the prevailing wage rate and the amount actually paid as specified in Labor Code section 1775;
(b) Contractor shall maintain and make available payroll and worker records in accordance with Labor Code sections 1771.4(a)(3), 1776 and 1812;
(c) If apprentices are employed on the project, Contractor shall ensure compliance with Labor Code section 1777.5;
(d) Contractor is aware of the limitations imposed on overtime work by Labor Code section 1810, et seq. and shall be responsible for any penalties levied in accordance with Labor Code section 1813 for failing to pay required overtime wages;
(e) Contractor shall be bound by each of the stipulations set forth at 40 USC § 3142(c), including the obligations to a) pay all laborers or mechanics employed directly on the site of the work, unconditionally and at least once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account, the full amounts accrued at the time of payment, computed at the required wage rate; b) post the applicable prevailing wage scale in a prominent and

accessible place at the work site; and c) agree that there may be withheld from accrued payments funds necessary to ensure workers are paid the required wage rate; (f) In accordance with 40 USC § 3143, all or part of this Agreement may be terminated for failure to pay the required prevailing rate of wages;
(g) In accordance with 8 Cal. Code Reg. section 16451(d), the applicable prevailing wage determinations shall be posted at each job site and Contractor will be responsible for posting the notice required by 8 Cal. Code Reg. section 16451(d) at each job site. Posters are available on the CMU website, at the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement District Offices or by emailing a request to [email protected]; and (h) Contractor and all subcontractors must comply with the requirements of Labor Code section 1771.1 pertaining to the registration of contractors pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. Registration and all related requirements of those sections must be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. This project is a “public work” in accordance with Labor Code §1720, et seq. It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to ensure that all workers employed in the execution of the Agreement are paid the correct prevailing rate of wages. The County has obtained from the director of the Department of Industrial Relations general prevailing wage determinations for the locality in which the work is to be performed. The determinations are on file and available in the County of San Diego Department of Purchasing and Contracting; 5560 Overland Ave., Ste. 270, San Diego, CA 92123-1204 and are available from the Department of Industrial Relations on the internet at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm.

5. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act. [for construction or repair contracts more than $2,000] (a) Contractor. The Contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. (b) Subcontracts. The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as the federal funding agency may by appropriate instructions require, and a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all these contract clauses.
(c) Breach. A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the Agreement, and for debarment as a Contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R. 5.12.

6. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. [for contracts more than $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers]
If mechanics or laborers are to be employed under this Agreement, Contractor shall comply with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR 5). Contractor shall compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. Contractor shall not require any laborer or mechanic to work in surroundings or under working conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous.

7. Clean Air Act and The Federal Water Pollution Control Act. [for contracts more than $150,000] Contractor shall comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.). Contractor shall report each violation to the USDA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office as required.

In addition, contractor shall report each violation to the County (and understands and agrees that the County will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency) and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

Contractor shall include this requirement in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal Assistance.

8. Debarment and Suspension.

Contractor certifies that, to the best of its knowledge, and except as disclosed to County and acknowledged in writing by County prior to the execution of this Agreement, Contractor and members of its Workforce:

(a) Are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension, or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency; (b) Have not within a 3-year period preceding this Agreement been convicted of, or had a civil or administrative judgment rendered against them for, the commission of fraud or a criminal offense or civil action in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, State, or local) transaction; violation of federal or State anti-trust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property; physical, financial or sexual abuse or misconduct with a patient or client, or medical negligence or malpractice; (c) Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally, civilly, or administratively charged by a government entity (federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in the paragraph above; (d) Are not presently the target or subject of any investigation, accusation, or charge related to the conduct of business by any federal, state, or local agency or law enforcement, licensing, certification, labor standards, occupational safety, ethics, or compliance body;
(e) Are not proposed for debarment by any state, local, or federal department or agency; (f) Do not have a judgment rendered against them by a body described in section 27. e. above that is unsatisfied; and
(g) Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this Agreement (i) been found in violation or had a judgment rendered against them resulting from the type of investigation, accusation, or charge described in section 27. d. or (ii) had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

Contractor shall have an ongoing duty during the term of this Agreement to disclose to the County any occurrence that would prevent Contractor from making the certifications contained in this section 27 on an ongoing basis.

Such disclosure shall be made in writing to the COR and the County Office of Ethics and Compliance within five (5) business days of when Contractor discovers or reasonably believes there is a likelihood of such occurrence.

This Agreement is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000. As such, the Contractor is required to verify that none of the Contractor’s principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935).

The Contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.

This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by County. If it is later determined that the Contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to County, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.

9. Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment.

In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1352 and related regulations, (a) Contractor certifies, and shall require each lowertier recipient (as that term is defined in 31 U.S.C. 1352) to certify to the tier above, that it will not and has not used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any covered federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352, and (b) Contractor shall disclose, and shall require each lower-tier recipient to disclose to the tier

above, any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any covered federal award.

10. Procurement of Recovered Materials.

Contractor shall comply with 2 CFR part 200.323 and shall procure only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000.

Contractor certifies that the percentage of recovered materials to be used in the performance of this Agreement will be at least the amount required by applicable specifications or other contractual requirements. (a) In the performance of this Agreement, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired:
i. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; ii. Meeting contract performance requirements; or
iii. At a reasonable price.
(b) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines website: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurementguideline-cpg-program. (c) Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, including the following:
i. For contracts over $100,000 in total value, Contractor shall estimate the percentage of total material utilized for the performance of the Agreement that is recovered materials and shall provide such estimate to County upon request.

11. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

In accordance with 2 CFR part 200.216, Contractor and its subcontractors are prohibited from expending funds under this Agreement to:
(a) Procure or obtain;
(b) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (c) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). i. For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). ii. Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. iii. Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

12. Domestic Preferences.

In accordance with 2 CFR 200.322, as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, Contractor shall, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). This requirement shall be included in all subcontracts under this Agreement. (a) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, must occur in the United States. (b) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of nonferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

13. Contracting with Small Businesses, Minority Businesses, Women's Business Enterprises, Veteran-Owned Businesses, and Labor Surplus Area Firms.

When possible, Contractor should ensure, in accordance with 2 C.F.R. § 200.321 “Contracting with small businesses, minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, veteran-owned businesses, and labor surplus area firms,” that small businesses, minority businesses, women’s business enterprises, veteran-owned businesses, and labor surplus area firms are considered for work under the Agreement by:
(a) Including such businesses on solicitation lists;
(b) Soliciting such businesses whenever they are deemed eligible as potential sources; (c) Dividing procurement transactions into separate procurements to permit maximum participation by such businesses;
(d) Establishing delivery schedules that encourage participation by such businesses; and (e) Using organizations such as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce.

14. Audit.

Contractor shall annually engage a Licensed Certified Public Accountant licensed to perform audits and attests in the State of California to conduct an annual financial audit of the organization. Contractors that expend $1,000,000 or more of federal grant funds per year shall have an audit conducted in compliance with Government Auditing Standards, which includes Single Audit Act Amendments and the Compliance Supplement (2 CFR part 200 App.

XI). Contractors that are commercial organizations (for-profit) are required to have a non-federal audit if, during its fiscal year, it expended a total of $750,000 or more under one or more HHS awards. 45 CFR part 74.26(d) incorporates the threshold and deadlines of the Compliance Supplement but provides for-profit organizations two options regarding the type of audit that will satisfy the audit requirements. Contractor shall include a clause in any agreement entered into with an audit firm, or notify the audit firm in writing prior to the audit firm commencing its work for Contractor, that the audit firm shall, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 7503, and to the extent otherwise required by law, provide access by the federal government or other legally required entity to the independent auditor’s working papers that were part of the independent auditor’s audit of Contractor. Contractor shall submit two (2) copies of the annual audit report, the audit performed in accordance with the Compliance Supplement, and the management letter to the County fifteen (15) days after receipt from the independent Certified Public Accountant but no later than nine (9) months after the Contractor’s fiscal year end.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant – Certification Regarding Lobbying P a g e 1 | 2

EXHIBIT D
Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING UNDER FY2025 OPSG
(All OPSG Participating Agencies)
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard FormLLL, 'Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,' in accordance with its instructions.

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden Grant – Certification Regarding Lobbying P a g e 2 | 2 Homeland Security Grant Program - Operation Stonegarden Grant (OPSG) CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING UNDER FY2025 OPSG
(All OPSG Participating Agencies)
The Subrecipient, as identified below, certifies, or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the Subrecipient understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Chap. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.

Name of Agency: ________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Agent: _______________________________________________ Printed Name of Authorized Agent: ___________________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________________

1 APPENDIX A
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Operations Order Report
Op Order Name: SDC/SDSO Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) FY2025 Op Order Number: 25-SDCSDC-09-001
Op Dates: From: 09/01/2025 To: 08/31/2026 (POP)
Report Date: 11/26/2025
(U) Warning: The information contained herein remains under the control of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Dissemination is for authorized law enforcement purposes only. (U) This document contains information that is UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (U//FOUO). It contains information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552).

It is to be controlled, stored, handled, transmitted, distributed, and disposed of in accordance with DHS policy relating to FOUO information and is not to be released to the public, the media, or other personnel who do not have a valid need-to-know without prior approval of an authorized CBP official. (U)
any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of,
Operational documents contain shared intelligence, information, targeted enforcement information, Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of USBP and partner State, Local, and Tribal law enforcement entities. PII should not be released as it places public safety officials in danger from illicit actors and shared intelligence and information should not be disclosed without notice and permission from the contributing la

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Law enforcement partnerships between federal, state, and local entities are critical to improving operational control of the border. Grant funding in the amount of $7,400,000 via Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) will be utilized by a total of 19 partner law enforcement agencies from local units of government within San Diego County, Sheriff's Offices from San Diego, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Mateo Counties, as well as California State Agencies to target border-related crime in the U.S./Mexico Border area and the Office (SDSO) will be the OPSG Grant
Administrator. The point-of contact (POC) will be Lieutenant Michael Gonzales. The U.S.

Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent will have operational oversight. The POC will be Assistant Chief Patrol Agent Anna Sofchek.

The USBP San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent (CPA), in coordination/collaboration with OPSG stakeholders, will determine which areas will be the focus of operations. Security threats and operational hours/activities will be determined jointly between the San Diego Sector unified command staff and the OPSG Integrated Planning Team (IPT). Maritime-specific operations will be coordinated jointly with the San Diego Regional Coordinating Mechanism (ReCoM), Los Angeles/Long Beach ReCoM, Central California Maritime Agency Coordination Group (CenCal MAC), and the San Francisco ReCoM.

2 Utilizing an all-threats approach in collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), state and local law enforcement agencies will exercise their unique jurisdictional capabilities in order to collaboratively address border security issues.

Historically, San Diego County has been a highly favored operational area for crime and drug smuggling organizations. The close proximity of Tijuana, Mexico to San Diego, California, population density, significant coastline, and extensive transportation networks leading to the interior immediately north of the border make San Diego a consistently lucrative target. Now, as the maritime smuggling threat increases, these organizations are looking for smuggling opportunities beyond San Diego County as demonstrated by Pangas being discovered more than 400 miles north in San Mateo County. Border-related crime represents an all-threat environment in that the primary criminal activity (drug/human smuggling) often results in cross-border criminal organizations and individuals undertaking secondary and frequently, tertiary criminal activities that involve a wider range of crimes (kidnappings, assaults, murders, money laundering, cross-border weapons trafficking, etc.). These criminal activities, when undertaken in the U.S., constitute a threat to domestic security, subsequently triggering involvement by state and local law enforcement.

I. SITUATION
A. General Situation:

San Diego County (SDC) includes approximately 60 miles of international land border, and the responsibility of the San Diego Sector includes the 931 miles of coastal border of the State of California, including beaches and bays. SDC has an effective level of security that is commensurate with known and identified risks associated with criminal organizations. The incidence of border violence associated with competing drug cartels in the Tijuana/Tecate areas has continued and still has great potential to spread into the United States. Frequent assaults against Border Patrol Agents are a common diversionary tactic utilized by smuggling organizations to further their criminal activity. During a particularly volatile situation on July 23, 2009, Border Patrol Agent Robert Rosas was murdered in close proximity to the border fence while responding to an incursion in the Campo Station area of responsibility (AOR). As security of the border is established and/or expanded within key target zones, criminal organizations resort to increasingly elaborate smuggling methods such as sophisticated cross-border tunnels, watercraft in the maritime environment, and ultra-light aircraft. U.S.

Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego Sector Domestic Operation Division will address specific threats posed by such organizations and aggressively integrate OPSG assets to reduce violent crime along the border, increase border security, and improve the quality of life within affected communities throughout the San Diego Sector operational AOR.

As the maritime threat continues to increase in San Diego Sector's AOR, it has been necessary to provide additional funding and support along the coast to address emerging maritime Panga smuggling events approximately 400 miles north in Monterey, Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties.

3 Since its inception, the intent of OPSG has been to enhance law enforcement Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act 2010 (PL 111-83), via the Homeland Security Grant Program, allocated $81 million in FY 2025 OPSG grant funds for use by local units of government to increase coordination and enforcement capabilities in support of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) goals, including those outlined in the Border Patrol National Strategy. For this grant year, the San Diego Sector and the San Diego County have been awarded $7,400,000 in FY 2025 OPSG Homeland Security Grant funds.

B. Terrain/Weather:

Terrain features within the San Diego Sector include beaches, estuaries, coastal plains, steep canyons and ravines, high desert, and mountains over six thousand feet in elevation. There are numerous environmentally sensitive and protected areas. Dense, low-lying brush and scrub trees cover much of the rural terrain throughout.

S
in the United States. The corridor includes the cities of San Diego, Imperial central corridor is comprised primarily of a blend of sparsely populated remote and rural wilderness areas. The eastern corridor consists of rural mountain and ranching enclaves with populations ranging from a few hundred up to several thousand.

Orange County through San Mateo County represents a rugged coastline along with varying weather. Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties include the Channel Islands. These islands are remote and desolate and represent an area of great concern for the San Diego Sector.

California State Parks and the California Highway Patrol are working together in those counties as the Maritime threat continues to move north along the California Coast.

Weather conditions vary greatly throughout the San Diego Sector. The western corridor generally maintains year-round mild temperatures that average 50 to 80 degrees. The central and eastern corridors can experience extremes in temperatures ranging from subfreezing to well over 100 degrees. Eastern portions of the County can experience occasional snowfall and high winds. In addition, the western portion of the San Diego Sector experiences frequent coastal eddies (a combination of low clouds and fog), which extend several miles inland.

4 Wildfires are a very real and persistent threat throughout the San Diego Sector.

The fire season extends from May through November. Historically, wildfires have resulted in the devastating loss of life and property.

The combination of climatic extremes, rugged terrain, dense urban corridors, and protected environmental areas presents a complex challenge to conducting daily operations. As such, enforcement entities operating within the counties utilize considerable ingenuity and flexibility in order to achieve their missions.

C. Criminal Element:

Drug smuggling organizations continue to pose significant threats throughout the area. These organizations have become increasingly sophisticated and use counter surveillance, diversionary tactics, night vision devices, and secure communications while conducting operations. Human trafficking, trans-border kidnappings, extortion, murder, and intimidation are common results of cartel competition for lucrative territory. Criminal debriefings, examination of pocket trash, and officer observations indicate substantial intelligence gathering efforts against law enforcement operations by area criminal organizations.

Smugglers frequently utilize dangerous tactics in order to further their cargo into the United States. Among these are failures to yield when vehicle or checkpoint stops are initiated, abandonment of the smuggling vehicle by the driver while it is still in motion, wrong way driving on freeways north through the Mexican Port of Entry into the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, and the overloading of boats with human cargo. The abandonment of individuals or entire groups by their guides in remote, inhospitable environments is not uncommon and has resulted in a significant number of deaths. Smuggling organizations using these, and other tactics, have been historically responsible for several assaults on Border Patrol Agents and local law enforcement officers.

D. Friendly Forces:

California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Department of Parks and Recreation
California Highway Patrol
Carlsbad Police Department
Chula Vista Police Department
El Cajon Police Department
Escondido Police Department
La Mesa Police Department
Oceanside Police Department
Orange County Sheriff's Department
Port Hueneme Police Department
San Diego Harbor Police Department

5 San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office
Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office
University of California San Diego Police Department
Ventura County Sheriff's Office
II. MISSION
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. CBP/U.S. Border Patrol, state, and local law enforcement agencies operating in San Diego, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Mateo Counties will collaborate to raise border security by:
intelligence/fusion opportunities
III. EXECUTION
A. Management/Supervisor Intent:

Participating OPSG law enforcement agencies will enforce local/state laws within their jurisdiction and will not enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC) on behalf of CBP/Border Patrol. Each participating agency will conduct enforcement activities that have a nexus and contribute to border security as described in the B. General Concept:

OPSG operational activities will emphasize those measures that increase border security in direct collaboration with CBP/Border Patrol. Participating agencies will utilize their unique areas of expertise and jurisdictional authority to patrol targeted areas within the county and participate in special operations targeting border nexus crime.

Border security threat and operational hours/activities will be determined jointly between the San Diego Sector unified command staff and the OPSG Integrated Planning Team (IPT). Maritime-specific operations will be coordinated jointly with the San Diego Regional Coordinating Mechanism (ReCoM), Los Angeles/Long Beach ReCoM, CenCal MAC, and the San Francisco ReCoM.

This operational concept does not result in a change or extension of Federal authority to state or local law enforcement agencies to enforce Federal immigration laws (Title 8 USC). It is anticipated however, that increased enforcement activities under OPSG will reduce the threat of border incursions and

6 also significantly impact the ability of criminal organizations to operate from the U.S. Mexico border in San Diego north along the coast to San Mateo County.

Participating agencies will utilize OPSG funding for overtime, fuel, mileage, vehicle/vessel maintenance, air support, and equipment in order to support enforcement operations as identified in the quarterly OPSG Operational Plan(s). If Federal immigration violations are encountered, state and local agencies will follow current local and state laws, policies and practices. This plan is subject to approval by the San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent (CPA) and the Office of Border Patrol (OBP) prior to release of OPSG funds.

C. Specific Responsibilities:

The main objective is to raise the level of U.S. border and California coastline security to reduce the threat of border-related crime by increasing law enforcement presence and special operations in rural and coastal areas, communities, and routes of land and marine egress throughout the San Diego Sector AOR, including San Diego, Orange, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Mateo Counties.

The participating agencies below will not enforce Title 8 (US Immigration law).

Participating OPSG law enforcement agencies within the State of California will continue to enforce local ordinances and state laws, including adherence to Senate Bill (SB) 54 guidelines, against violators in target areas to help reduce criminal activity associated with transnational criminal organizations.

Participating agencies will utilize OPSG funding for operational overtime, fuel, mileage, vehicle/vessel maintenance, air support, and equipment in order to support operations.

Participating agencies may conduct intelligence-driven operations and perform coordinated cyclical intelligence based criminal interdiction operations as necessary in collaboration with the OPSG IPT. Operations described as follows may be modified in order to facilitate additional enforcement efforts within allocated funds.

All OPSG air operations will de-conflict with CBP and notify the San Diego ReCoM, Los Angeles/Long Beach ReCoM, CenCal MAC, or the San Francisco ReCoM prior to flight.

San Diego County Sheriff's Office, USBP San Diego Sector and Station Special Operations Groups and Intelligence Units, in conjunction with OPSG Partners and Task Forces, will conduct intelligence-based operations within the San Diego Sector during the time period outlined during the Border Patrol weekly Unified Command meetings, along with the ReCoM and OPSG IPT.

7 Sector-wide, high visibility special operations will be performed quarterly with a focus on intelligence based criminal interdiction. The multi-agency, cross jurisdictional special operations will include all the participating agencies below and be coordinated by the San Diego County Sheriff's Office and USBP San Diego Sector.

OPSG funds will be used for reasonable operational overtime costs associated with law enforcement activities in support of the mission to reduce the threat of border-related crimes. Overtime pay is specifically for increased patrol time for sworn/certified public safety officers or peace officers, including, but not limited to, rangers, lifeguards, detectives, and investigators who will work in a patrol capacity on assigned OPSG shifts, along with other law enforcement support personnel such as communication officers/dispatchers and patrol pilots.

Participating agencies may not utilize OPSG funds to pay for a personnel's overtime hours or cost that exceeds 16 hours worked in any 24-hour period.

D. Coordinating Instructions:

The San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent will have operational oversight and in coordination/collaboration with OPSG stakeholders, will determine which areas will be the focus of operations. The San Diego Sector and local participating agencies will be executing a yearly OPSG operational plan for submission to OBP. San Diego Sector stations will be responsible for OPSG-related enforcement activities and intelligence sharing within their respective AORs. An Incident Command System (ICS) may be utilized to facilitate Sector-wide coordination and monitoring of OPSG activities as warranted during special operations. San Diego Sector stations and local/state representatives will ensure daily OPSG activities within their respective AOR are monitored and reported accordingly. Stations will be responsible for reporting OPSG-related intelligence to the Sector Intelligence Department (SID) as appropriate. For maritime operations, the ReCoM will be responsible for the aforementioned requirements.

Each of the 19 participating OPSG agencies will have a designated management representative as noted in the Specific Responsibilities section of this operational plan.

Activity Reporting:

The Daily Activity Report must be submitted using the CBP Operation Stonegarden Data Management System in www.HSIN.gov within 48 hours of the conclusion of each OPSG shift.

Information Sharing:

Information from source documents (e.g., arrest reports, citations, field interviews, etc.) will be entered into www.HSIN.gov. Items of interest will

8 be developed by Intelligence Units and forwarded to appropriate agency/task force for action.

Intelligence Products:

Intelligence products including mapping, trend analysis, community impact, and target files will be developed via a collaborative effort between the Intelligence Units and appropriate agency/task force.

Performance Metrics:

OPSG impact on border security and public safety will be gauged by several mechanisms:
misdemeanor/felony arrests, and contraband seizures in OPSG target areas.
their activities.
community impact data developed by Fusion Centers within the San Diego Sector.

Regional Scheduling:

Each partner agency will send their weekly/bi-weekly/monthly OPSG schedule (whichever applies), utilizing the appropriate format, to the San Diego Sector OPSG Points of Contact.

Points of Contact:

1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW)
OPSG Representative: Lieutenant Austin Smith (858) 750-5898 Conduct coastal waters and tidelands patrols along the state coastline and the shore islands including San Clemente and Catalina islands Conduct maritime interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbor/marinas, and routes of egress from the border to include beach communities between the counties of San Diego and Santa Cruz Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations with special emphasis on support of maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities

9 2. California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) OPSG Representative: Chief Ranger Nicole Van Doren (619) 985-7169 Conduct interdictions to assist in the reduction of criminal activity associated with transnational criminal organizations through State Parks, with special emphasis to support maritime enforcement
Conduct high visibility enforcement within Border Field State Park with a focus on criminal activities impacting border security to include hosted social functions or special events
Conduct waterside and land side patrols within the eastern, desert region of San Diego County, the coastal districts of San Diego County and Orange County, and other coastal districts in the north to include Los Angeles City, San Luis Obispo County and Santa Cruz County (intelligence-driven or on-call basis)

3. California Highway Patrol (CHP)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Todd Maxson (858) 944-6353 Road enforcement dedicated task forces at various hours in the San Diego Sector AOR, with special emphasis on border egress and maritime smuggling routes
Conduct coastal interdiction patrols along the San Diego, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo counties
Task forces consisting of commercial, canine and patrol officers will perform coordinated cyclical intelligence based criminal interdiction operations throughout the San Diego Sector AOR with emphasis on commercial traffic waiting to avoid scales and check points during operational hours
Commercial dedicated task forces patrolling in the San Diego Sector AOR

4. Carlsbad Police Department (CPD)
OPSG Representative: Lieutenant Gary Marshall (760) 931-2197 Conduct weekly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR to include Pacific Coast Highway, Interstate-5, and State Route 78
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways and routes of egress from the border

5. Chula Vista Police Department (CVPD)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Joe Picone (619) 691-5124

10 Border egress patrols in the vicinity of the eastern and southern boundaries of the City of Chula Vista to include Otay Lakes Road, Wueste Road, Proctor Valley Rd, Hunte Parkway, Birch Road and Main Street Intelligence-driven and storm drain surveillance and interdiction Conduct high visibility intelligence-based criminal interdiction operations targeting drug trafficking organizations within the city limits of Chula Vista, Marinas, and known smuggling corridors
Conduct weekly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR
Conduct interdiction operations on coastline roads and routes of egress from the border

6. El Cajon Police Department (ECPD)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Kai Mandelleh (619) 921-7051 Conduct high visibility intelligence-based criminal interdiction operations targeting transnational criminal organization activity within the city limits of El Cajon, the I-8 egress and surrounding feeder roads and areas, to include known smuggling corridors
Conduct monthly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR

7. Escondido Police Department (EPD)
OPSG Representative: Lieutenant Janice Kuehn (760) 839-4763 Conduct operations targeting criminal gang members and border security nexus crime
Conduct weekly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on inland corridors/roadways and routes of egress from the border

8. La Mesa Police Department (LMPD)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Daniel Herrin (619) 405-2111 Conduct weekly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on smuggling corridors and routes of egress from the border

9. Oceanside Police Department (OPD)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Mark Bussey (760) 435-4706 Conduct vessel patrols along San Diego coastal waters and Oceanside Harbor

11 Conduct land side patrols in the vicinity of Coast Highway in the City of Oceanside providing coastal observation, prevention, and interdiction of maritime incursions
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbors/marinas, and routes of egress from the border 10 OPSG Representative: Sergeant Charles Johnson (949) 723-1002 Conduct patrols in and around Newport, Dana Point, and Sunset Harbors.

Open ocean patrols will be conducted in coastal waters north to the Los Angeles County border and south to the San Diego County border as intelligence dictates. OCSD marine assets may be utilized farther north or south as required
Utilizing specially trained highway interdiction Deputies and Investigators along known trafficking corridors, OCSD will conduct high visibility interdiction patrols in a focused effort to intercept contraband being transported by means of private or commercial motor vehicles along the freeways and highways throughout Orange County and its surrounding areas
Coordinate efforts through the Los Angeles/Long Beach ReCoM and the Maritime Coordination Center (MCC) and provide coastal observation per MAC IC collection requirements for maritime enforcement assets patrolling the immediate coastline
Perform coordinated cyclical intelligence based criminal interdiction operations
Report and de-conflict all OPSG operations through the MCC in Long Beach prior to deployment

11. Port Hueneme Police Department (PHPD)
OPSG Representative: Officer Zach Frum (805) 657-7040
Conduct intelligence-based coastline patrols from Carpinteria to Mugu Rock
Conduct critical infrastructure patrol near Naval CBC Port Hueneme, Point Mugu Naval Air Station and the Port of Hueneme.
12 OPSG Representative: Sergeant Rafael Garcia (831) 755-3722 Conduct coastal interdiction patrols with special emphasis on support of maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities
Conduct weekly patrol operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the San Diego Sector AOR

12 Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline highways to include State Highway 1 that parallels the Pacific Ocean

13. OPSG Coordinator: Lieutenant Michael Gonzales (858) 790-1367 Conduct patrols (days and times of shift to be determined during weekly ReCoM meetings) in the vicinity of Seacoast Drive, Border Field State Park and adjacent beach areas. Deputies will coordinate efforts and provide coastal observation for maritime enforcement assets patrolling the immediate coastline.

Perform coordinated cyclical intelligence based criminal interdiction operations once per month in the Imperial Beach and South San Diego areas.

Conduct patrols in the vicinity of Otay Lakes Road from Wueste Road to State Route 94 and/or Alta Road to Otay Mesa Road.

Conduct multiple special operations as necessary, including traffic enforcement in the vicinity of Donovan and George Bailey Detention Facilities, off-road vehicle enforcement on Otay Mesa, joint bandit interdiction operations on Otay Mountain, and joint narcotic interdiction in Otay Valley.

Coordinate border egress patrols in the vicinity of State Route 94 from Barrett Lake Road to Forest Gate Road and adjacent communities, with special emphasis on State Route 188 and Tecate.

Conduct patrols on Interstate 8, from Greenfield Drive to In Ko Pah Road, to include communities of Lakeside, unincorporated El Cajon, Alpine and Boulevard.

Deploy directed patrols and traffic enforcement on Interstate 8 and State Route 94, to include Border Patrol checkpoint and the Tecate Port of Entry (POE).

Coordinate border egress patrols in the vicinity of State Route 94, from Campo to Jacumba and intersecting routes north to Interstate 8, to include Pine Valley and Border Patrol Interstate-8/Old Highway 80 westbound checkpoints.

Conduct narcotic interdiction, focusing on both Interstate 15 and Interstate 5, north of State Route 78.

Conduct directed patrols in the City of Vista, along State Route 78, for illegal gang and narcotic activities.

Coordinate highway interdiction on Interstate 5 between San Diego and Orange counties, to include directed patrols at the rest areas and harbors.

Conduct maritime interdiction/coastal observation and patrols at or near beach communities from Del Mar north to the County line.

Liaise with USBP personnel and specialized units to conduct intelligencedriven operations.

Sector-wide-Special Operations

13 SDSO, San Diego Sector and Station Special Operations Group and Intelligence Units, in conjunction with OPSG partners and task forces, will conduct intelligence-based operations within the County during the time period outlined in the Border Patrol weekly Unified Command meetings, along with the ReCoM and OPSG Integrated Planning Team (IPT).

SDSO dispatchers and/or Lieutenant-field operations may be utilized to support high visibility enforcement actions when multiple stakeholders and/or multiple SDSO units are engaged and/or while working under the ICS system.

SDSO may conduct ASTREA flight operations in support of OPSG mission. All OPSG air operations will de-conflict with CBP Air San Diego and notify the San Diego Sector Communications Center at (619) 498- 9900 prior to flight.

14. San Diego Harbor Police Department (SDHPD)
OPSG Representative: Lieutenant Victor Banuelos (619) 686-6376 Conduct weekly vessel patrols around the coastal waters and/or tidelands in the Southern California coastline
Conduct boat ramp/marina patrol in the San Diego Sector AOR Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways and routes of egress from the border

15. San Luis Obispo Sheriff's Office (SLOSO)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Eleotte Coyes (805) 788-2087 Conduct ground and coastal operations along remote rural areas of the County's coastline, with special emphasis on support of maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities.

Conduct maritime patrols off the County's coastline from Point Sal to Ragged Point
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbors/marinas, and routes of egress from the coastal border

16. OPSG Representative: Sergeant Robert Raw (650) 573-3740 Conduct coastal interdiction patrols to include the entire coastline along Highway 1 between the City of Pacifica in San Mateo County and the Town of Davenport in Santa Cruz County
Conduct high-visibility patrol operations on a monthly basis with a focus on maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbors/marinas, and routes of egress from the coastal border

14 17. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office (SBSO)
OPSG Representative: Lieutenant Robert Minter (805) 681-4353 Conduct coastal interdiction patrols with special emphasis on support of maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities
Conduct overt and covert patrols with a focus on transnational criminal activity along the Santa Barbara County coastline and Highway 101 corridor
Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbors/marinas, and routes of egress from the coastal border

18. University of California San Diego Police Department (UCSD PD) OPSG Representative: Sergeant Patrick Dobbins (858) 534-3644 Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on maritime roadways and routes of egress from the border, with special emphasis to areas adjacent to the UCSD, San Diego campus
Conduct high visibility patrols and special operations along the shorelines of La Jolla, Del Mar, Torrey Pines, Glider Port, Scripps Pier and Scripps Institute of Oceanography

19. Ventura County Sheriff's Office (VCSO)
OPSG Representative: Sergeant Adam Garnier (805) 797-7141 Conduct high-visibility coastal patrols with special emphasis on support of maritime enforcement related to smuggling activities
Conduct operations to include aerial support and covert operations with a focus on transnational criminal activity within the Ventura County AOR Conduct efforts through the Maritime Coordination Center (MCC) and provide coastal observation per MAC IC collection requirements for maritime enforcement assets patrolling the immediate coastline Conduct intelligence based criminal interdiction operations on coastline roadways, harbors/marinas, and routes of egress from the coastal border E. Public/Open Records Requests:

In order to accomplish the Operation Stonegarden mission, law enforcement sensitive information is shared between Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies. This information includes intelligence sharing, CONOPS/Applications, Operations Orders, Fragmentary Orders, Daily Activity Reports, After Action Reports, and more. OPSG records and documents may contain law enforcement sensitive information. Participating agencies agree to protect OPSG documents in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Agencies should, while

15 complying with State and local laws and policies, also notify their local USBP San Diego Sector staff when the agency receives a public records request for OPSG documents that were created by USBP.

IV. ADMINISTRATION/LOGISTICS
A. Cost Estimates/Funding Issues:

Reimbursement for OPSG participants will be contingent upon approval of this operational plan, developed jointly between OPSG representatives and CBP/Border Patrol. No operations will commence and/or funds drawn prior to plan approval by OBP. The San Diego Office will be the OPSG Grant Administrator.

Funding for each participant will be approved on a case-by-case basis specific to the operational plan. Enforcement efforts and priorities may be shifted accordingly.

The State Administrative Agency (SAA) must report Operation Stonegarden obligations/expenditures via the Categorical Assistance Progress (CAPR)/Biannual Strategy Implementation Reports (BSIR) semi-annually and the Financial Status Report (SF-269a) by calendar quarter.

Local and state law enforcement agencies shall not utilize OPSG funding to supplant their inherent routine patrol and law enforcement operations in order to perform activities not directly related to increasing border security. Fringe Benefits for friendly forces:

The agencies listed below are not requesting any additional fringe benefits. All benefits costs associated with OPSG shifts will be covered in overtime costs.

Escondido Police Department
Port Hueneme Police Department
Ventura County Sheriff's Office

16

17

18

19

20 B. Travel:

Not applicable.

C. Lodging:

Not applicable.

D. Reception of Detailed Personnel:

Not applicable.

E. Uniform and Equipment:

All personnel assigned to this operation will utilize the approved agency uniform in accordance with each agency Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). No deviations from these SOPs are anticipated.

F. Special Equipment:

Not applicable.

G. Processing:

Participating OPSG law enforcement agencies will enforce local and state laws within their jurisdiction and will not enforce immigration laws (Title 8 USC) on behalf of CBP/Border Patrol. Apprehension and seizures will be processed in accordance with existing federal, state, and local laws, policies and guidelines.

State felony warrant suspects in CBP/Border Patrol custody will be managed in accordance with existing agreements between the San Diego Sector and local agencies.

21 H. Medical:

Medical emergencies will be handled by the closest available medical facility, and in accordance with established departmental policies and procedures of each OPSG participating agency.

I. Detention/Transportation:

Apprehended individuals will be transported in accordance with federal, state and local laws, policies, agreements and guidelines of the arresting agency.

J. Vehicles:

Local and state law enforcement vehicles will be used in support of this operation. Participating agencies will be responsible for the fuel and maintenance of their vehicles. Fuel, mileage, and maintenance costs may be reimbursed in whole or in part for those vehicles utilized in OPSG-related operations.

V. COMMAND/CONTROL/COMMUNICATION
A. Chain of Command:

Participating agencies will maintain their individual chains of command as dictated by internal policies and guidelines.

U.S. Border Patrol - San Diego Sector
Chief Patrol Agent: Jeffrey Stalnaker
Deputy Chief Patrol Agent: Rjay Rippel
Deputy Division Chief: Lewis F Salling
Assistant Chief Patrol Agent: Anna M. Sofchek (520) 603-2293 Special Operations Supervisor: Saul Rocha (760) 807-8411 B. Unit Command:

U.S. Border Patrol Stations:

Boulevard Station
Brown Field Station
Campo Station
Chula Vista Station
Imperial Beach Station

22 Murrieta Station
San Clemente Station
C. Communication Details:

Communication protocol will be managed in accordance with each participating necessary, coordinated by the Incident Command System (ICS) when active.

ANNEXES A. Administration Annex:

Office will be the OPSG Grant Administrator. The grant
funding for each of the OPSG participants is approved on a case-by-case basis specific to the yearly operational plan. The San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent in coordination with the OPSG IPT will determine which areas will be the focus of operations and may shift enforcement efforts and priorities accordingly. Operational plans may be amended as necessary. State and local law enforcement agencies shall not use OPSG funding to supplant their inherent routine patrol and law enforcement operations in order to perform activities not directly related to increasing border security.

B. Execution Annex:

Not applicable.

C. Media Action Plan:

Inquiries will be directed to the USBP San Diego Sector Information and Communications Division (619) 216-4182. Participating OPSG agencies will manage media inquiries as indicated by their individual departmental policies.

D. Legal Review:

This operational plan has been reviewed for legal sufficiency by CBP Office of Assistant Chief Counsel.

E. Risks:

No additional risks have been associated with this Operation Order (OPORD).

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 13, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND

APPROPRIATION OF A GRANT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) TO

CONDUCT A SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT

PROGRAM (STEP) FOR DUI ENFORCEMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $115,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 (FY27)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Police
Recommendation:

In line with Vision Zero, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution accepting and appropriating $115,000 in FY27 funding from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to support traffic and safety education, prevention, and enforcement efforts focused on primary collision factors (PCF) and driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol and drugs. The funding will support overtime, equipment, and training expenses incurred during the 12-month program.

Fiscal Impact:

Participation by the La Mesa Police Department will be limited to paid overtime for Police Sergeant(s), Police Officer(s), Community Service Officer(s), Downtown Operations Assistant(s), Communication Supervisor(s), and Police Dispatcher(s) for selected traffic enforcement operations during the twelve-month period of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027. Monies will also be used for DUI checkpoint supplies and training in drug and alcohol-impaired driving enforcement.

Total costs are not to exceed the final grant award of $115,000 and will be reimbursed by billing OTS. With City Council approval, the maximum amount that OTS would reimburse the City of La Mesa would be $115,000.

City’s Strategic Goals:

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

BACKGROUND:

The La Mesa City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Vision Zero Plan to reduce traffic fatalities in the City to zero.

In January 2026, the La Mesa Police Department applied for a competitive grant through the OTS. The grant was awarded to the City of La Mesa to support enforcement efforts focused on DUI, speeding, distracted driving, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. These efforts support the City’s goal of improving public safety through proven and effective strategies to reduce traffic crashes and prevent serious injuries and fatalities.

The Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) aims to reduce the number of people killed or injured in collisions involving these enforcement areas. The grant provides funding for local police resources to conduct overtime enforcement within their primary jurisdictions and implement best-practice strategies, including community education, DUI checkpoints, speed enforcement, distracted driving enforcement, and pedestrian and bicycle safety enforcement. These activities will be conducted at various times during a twelve-month grant period from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027.

Data from 2023–2025 show that traffic safety remains a concern in the City of La Mesa.

Fatal crashes increased from 1 in 2023 to 3 in both 2024 and 2025. Although injury crashes declined in 2025, alcohol-related, nighttime, speeding, DUI, improper turning, and hit-and-run crashes continued to cause deaths and injuries. These trends show that risky driving behaviors remain a major factor in crashes and support the need for continued OTS STEP grant-funded enforcement and education efforts.

DISCUSSION:

During this grant’s twelve-month enforcement program, the La Mesa Police Department will be scheduling approximately six DUI checkpoints, eight DUI saturation patrols, three “Know Your Limit” DUI education campaigns, three enforcement operations focused on, but not limited to, PCF violations, two enforcement operations focused on bicyclists and pedestrian violations, and four enforcement operations focusing on violations of “distracted driving.” All operations will be conducted in the City of La Mesa on an overtime basis, where the officers will work above and beyond the normal patrol staffing levels. The grant will provide funding for officer training and DUI checkpoint supplies, enabling officers to conduct safe, effective, and highly visible traffic enforcement operations.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the acceptance of this grant and appropriation of the related funds.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Ray Sweeney
City Manager Chief of Police
Attachments:

A: Resolution
B. Grant Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF A GRANT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY TO CONDUCT A

SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM FOR DUI
ENFORCEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $115,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 WHEREAS, on September 25, 2018, the La Mesa City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Vision Zero Plan to reduce traffic fatalities to zero in the City of La Mesa;
WHEREAS, the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has established the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant to support enforcement and education efforts aimed at deterring unsafe roadway behaviors and promoting safer driving practices;
WHEREAS, OTS has awarded the City of La Mesa $115,000 under the STEP grant for the period of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027; WHEREAS, the funding will be utilized to support local law enforcement traffic safety and education; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Mesa has agreed that increasing selective traffic enforcement is an important element in improving public safety.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council authorizes the acceptance and appropriation of a grant from OTS, in the amount of $115,000 to conduct a twelve-month traffic program; provided, however, that if the actual revenue received from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to equal the amount actually received.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 1 of 20
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT27190

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
La Mesa From:

To:
10/01/2026
09/30/2027 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
La Mesa Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed:

Allocation is contingent upon availability of federal funds. $115,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
• Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure • Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable) • Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable) • Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
• Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
• Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *The item shown with an asterisk (*), is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto. This document can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

Use of OTS Grant Agreement template in lieu of the California Model Agreement (CMA) The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) utilizes its standardized OTS Grant Agreement template for awards. The format, structure, and uniformity of the OTS Grant Agreement template allows for processing through Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS). OTS’s approach to using the OTS Grant Agreement template is consistent with the California Model Agreement (CMA) developed by University of California Office of the President (UCOP) and directed by the Department of General Service (DGS). For more information, please review the OTS Grant Program Manual.

Pre-Agreement Work
No work shall commence and no costs shall be incurred prior to the grant start date or the grant agreement being fully signed and executed. Any such costs are incurred at the grantee’s own risk and may not be reimbursed.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 2 of 20

8. Approval Signatures
We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the grant terms and conditions described herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

David Willis
Sergeant
[email protected]
(619) 667-7576
8085 University Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Greg Humora
City Manager
[email protected]
(619) 667-1105
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Shannon Esenwein
Finance Director
[email protected]
(619) 667-1122
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Stephanie Dougherty
Director
[email protected]
(916) 509-3030
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Mary Khang SAM #:

REGISTERED
ADDRESS:

CITY:

ZIP+4:

YZG4GLD1LTA1
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa
91942-5502
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95758

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 3 of 20

10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $115,000.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above, notwithstanding allocations contingent on availability of federal funds.
$115,000.00

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE $115,000.00

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 4 of 20
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT27190

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Describe the city, county, or jurisdiction this grant will impact.

The City of La Mesa is an incorporated municipality located in eastern San Diego County, California. It is nine square miles with an updated population of 65,000 people. It is a fully developed urban community with a mix of residential neighborhoods, commercial corridors, schools, parks, and transit facilities. La Mesa is intersected by major regional transportation routes, such as Interstate 8 and several high-volume arterial roadways that serve both local and regional traffic. In addition, the City of La Mesa has 5 trolley stops which attract residents and travelers all across San Diego County. These areas experience significant daily vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian activity, increasing exposure to traffic conflicts.

Describe the problem(s) to be addressed, supported by current and relevant crash data. (most recent calendar year data/stats).

Crash data from 2023 to 2025 indicate ongoing roadway safety concerns in the City of La Mesa. Fatal crashes increased from 1 in 2023 to 3 in 2024 and remained at 3 in 2025, with fatal victims following the same pattern. Injury crashes rose from 196 in 2023 to 209 in 2024 before declining to 154 in 2025, while injured victims totaled 258, 273, and 208 respectively. Alcohol-involved crashes contributed to 25 injury crashes and 31 injured victims in 2023, increased to 41 injury crashes and 58 injured victims in 2024, and remained elevated in 2025 with 26 injury crashes and 34 injured victims, and were associated with fatal crashes in 2024 and 2025. Nighttime crashes between 21:00 and 02:59 hours resulted in fatal crashes in 2 of the 3 years, and injury crashes increased from 23 in 2023 to 30 in 2025, with injured victims rising from 27 to 35. Driving under the influence accounted for 1 fatal crash and 56 injury crashes, resulting in 1 death and 34 injuries, while improper turning contributed to 40 injury crashes and 17 injuries, and unsafe speed resulted in 37 injury crashes and 35 injuries. Hit-and-run crashes produced no fatalities but resulted in 17 to 25 injury crashes per year and 20 to 27 injured victims. These data demonstrate that preventable, behaviorrelated factors continue to drive fatal and injury crashes in La Mesa, highlighting the need for targeted enforcement and education efforts to reduce impaired driving, speeding, and other high-risk behaviors on local streets and arterial roadways.

Define the target population the grant intends to serve and how they are affected by the problem(s).

The target population for this grant includes all roadway users in La Mesa, including drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and bicyclists, who are directly affected by the city’s high rates of fatal and injury crashes.

Certain groups are particularly at risk, including older adults and low-income residents, who may have limited access to safe transportation options, rely more on walking or public transit, and may be disproportionately affected by traffic-related injuries. Nighttime drivers, young adults, pedestrians, and bicyclists are also at higher risk for involvement in crashes. In addition, a high-risk area in La Mesa is the La Mesa Village, which is our downtown area that's all contained within 4 blocks. This makes it a highly congested area and has a higher risk for driving under the influence.

Targeted traffic enforcement and education programs aimed at reducing impaired driving, speeding, unsafe maneuvers, and other high-risk behaviors. By focusing on high-risk areas, times, and behaviors, the grant will enhance roadway safety for all users while providing additional protection to at-risk groups, including seniors and low-income residents.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 5 of 20

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a news release announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31st. The kick-off news releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
12 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. Report on the outcomes of the “DUI BOLO” program.
12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 2 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 2 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).
1 7. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.
6 8. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 8

9. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
3 10. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
4 11. Conduct highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers. 1 12. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 2

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 6 of 20

13. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
2 14. Conduct Know Your Limit campaigns with an effort to reach members of the community.
3 15. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 1

16. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 3

17. Send law enforcement personnel to DUI Checkpoint Planning and Management training.
1 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year) • The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
• Conduct all training needed to implement the program, in the first quarter. • Purchase all grant related supplies and materials to implement the program, in the first quarter. • Items with a unit cost of $5,000 more (including tax and shipping) must comply with the Buy America Act.
• In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly. • Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

Media Requirements
Issue a news release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31 and after the grant is signed and executed, but no sooner than October 1, the start of the grant year. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO. If you are unable to meet the December 31 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate the reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year) Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
• Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
• Send all PowerPoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process.
• The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator. • Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, news releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a news release, educational material, or link to social media post.
• If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.
• News releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are EXEMPT from the OTS PIO approval process.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 7 of 20
The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
• Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are EXEMPT from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator with the embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email. • Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval.
• Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
• Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication. • Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. • Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult the OTS PIO and copy your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.
• Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so the OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event. If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of the event within 7 days following significant grant-related event or program. The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified in advance when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
• Any news releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year must be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
• For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and FAQs .
• Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
• Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives. • Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
• Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
• Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 8 of 20

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 9 of 20
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT27190

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
164ID-27 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$86,000.00
402PT-27 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$18,000.00
405e DDA-27 20.616 Distracted Driving Awareness $11,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI/DL Checkpoints 164ID-27 $7,500.00 6 $45,000.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 164ID-27 $3,050.00 8 $24,400.00
Know Your Limit 164ID-27 $2,550.00 3 $7,650.00
Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164ID-27 $2,006.00 1 $2,006.00 Benefits - 164ID OT @ 6.15% 164ID-27 $79,056.00 1 $4,862.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-27 $3,000.00 3 $9,000.00
Motorcycle Safety Enforcement 402PT-27 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-27 $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 Traffic Safety Educational Presentations 402PT-27 $502.00 2 $1,004.00 Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-27 $815.00 3 $2,445.00 Benefits - 402PT OT @ 6.15% 402PT-27 $15,449.00 1 $950.00 Distracted Driving Enforcement 405e DDA27$2,590.67 4 $10,363.00 Benefits - 405e OT @ 6.15% 405e DDA27$10,362.52 1 $637.00 Category Sub-Total $111,317.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-27 $1,601.00 1 $1,601.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $1,601.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies 164ID-27 $2,082.10 1 $2,082.00
Category Sub-Total $2,082.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 10 of 20
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $115,000.00

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 11 of 20
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT27190

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Know Your Limit - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety presentations or campaigns conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Benefits - 164ID OT @ 6.15% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Total Benefits: 6.15%
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Motorcycle Safety Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Traffic Safety Educational Presentations - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety educational presentations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Benefits - 402PT OT @ 6.15% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Total Benefits: 6.15%
Distracted Driving Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Benefits - 405e OT @ 6.15% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Total Benefits: 6.15%

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum, OTS Traffic Safety Summit, GHSA Annual Meeting in Anaheim. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
-

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device Supplies, PAS Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies. Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed.

INDIRECT COSTS

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 12 of 20
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Salaries may include wages, salaries, special compensations, or authorized absences such as annual leave and sick leave provided the cost for the individual employee is (a) reasonable for the services rendered, and (b) follows an appointment made in accordance with state or local laws and rules and meets federal requirements.

Any non-grant funded vacancies created by reassignment to a grant-funded position must be filled at the expense of the grantee agency.

Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

The OTS grant funded activities must be separate from other grant funded program activities and maintained under separate accounting tracking codes (example: the same DUI checkpoint may not be funded by both the CHP Cannabis Tax Fund and the OTS).

Benefits for personnel costs can only be applied to straight time or overtime hours charged to the grant.

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 13 of 20
Appendix A to Part 1300—Certifications and Assurances for Highway Safety Grants (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Section 25024, Public Law 117- 58)
The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.

Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:
• 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended; • Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58; • 23 CFR part 1300—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs; • 2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
• 2 CFR part 1201—Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
• 49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); • 28 CFR 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);
• The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);
• Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
• The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the
Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federallyfunded or not); • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT27190

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 14 of 20
The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,” respectively.

GENERAL ASSURANCES
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA.”
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:

1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.

2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
“The [name of Recipient], in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”

3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred to as DOT order 1050.2A) [1]in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.

4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.

5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 15 of 20
form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any subrecipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.

The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing below is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will—

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted—

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 16 of 20
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES)

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 17 of 20

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS—PRIMARY TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 18 of 20
its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 19 of 20
records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION—LOWER TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts. b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

8/19/2026 11:22:52 AM Page 20 of 20
No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient.

If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website ( www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or reevaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 13, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND

APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE

CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) TO

CONDUCT A TRAFFIC RECORDS IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT (TRIP) FOR FY27
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Police
Recommendation:

In line with Vision Zero, staff recommends that the City Council accept and appropriate $14,000 in FY27 funding from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to support the Traffic Records Improvement Project (TRIP).

Fiscal Impact:

Total costs are not to exceed the final grant award of $14,000 and will be reimbursed by billing OTS. With City Council approval, the maximum amount that OTS would reimburse the City of La Mesa would be $14,000.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.

BACKGROUND:

The State of California’s OTS provides grant funding to law enforcement agencies throughout the state. These funds support the development and continuation of programs designed to address current and emerging traffic safety needs. In addition to administering grant funding, OTS conducts public awareness campaigns and serves as a statewide traffic safety resource, engaging the public and media to reinforce local education and enforcement efforts. The City of La Mesa has historically received OTS grants to support the Traffic Unit’s enforcement, training, and traffic safety initiatives.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 2 of 2
The purpose of the TRIP grant is to strengthen traffic data collection and reporting capabilities, supporting safer roadways and efforts to reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities. Grant funding will support the purchase and implementation of an upgraded electronic collision reporting system that improves the collection and transmission of information to state and local records management systems.

DISCUSSION:

During this grant period, the La Mesa Police Department will purchase and implement upgraded software to improve its current collision reporting system. The upgraded system will facilitate the timely submission of data to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). Enhanced reporting capabilities will provide more reliable and accessible data, helping the Department identify trends, assess traffic safety concerns, and prioritize enforcement and prevention efforts.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the acceptance of this grant and appropriation of the related funds.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Ray Sweeney
City Manager Chief of Police
Attachments:

A. Resolution
B. Grant Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF GRANT

FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY TO

CONDUCT A TRAFFIC RECORDS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $14,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2018, the La Mesa City Council approved a resolution to adopt a Vision Zero Plan to reduce traffic fatalities to zero in the City of La Mesa;
WHEREAS, the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has established the Traffic Records Improvement Project (TRIP) grant to advance traffic record data reporting, collection, and management;
WHEREAS, OTS has awarded the City of La Mesa $14,000 under the TRIP grant for the period of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, the funding will be utilized to upgrade the collision reporting system to allow timely and accurate data to be submitted to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council authorizes the acceptance and appropriation of a grant from OTS, in the amount of $14,000 to improve our traffic records system; provided, however, that if the actual revenue received from the source specified should be more or less than the amount set forth herein, that the appropriations shall be adjusted to equal the amount actually received.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: October 13, 2026
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO

STRADA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TO UPDATE THE

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt a resolution waiving competitive bidding requirements pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070a (6) and a $69,800 task order to Strada Traffic Engineering to update the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP).

Fiscal Impact:

Funds in the amount of $69,800 are available in the current fiscal year budget in Account No. 3106-6430, Professional and Specialized Services. The updated LRSP is required for the City to remain eligible to apply for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community.

BACKGROUND:

In November 2019, the City of La Mesa received a Caltrans grant to prepare its first LRSP.

In February 2020, the City Council awarded a task order to STC Traffic, Inc., to prepare the Plan. A preliminary draft of the LRSP was reviewed by City staff and circulated to the City’s safety partners for review and comment. Comments received from the safety partners were subsequently incorporated into the draft LRSP.

On February 1, 2023, the Mobility Commission reviewed the draft LRSP and provided recommendations related to pedestrian safety, coordination between the Capital

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 2 of 3
Improvement Program (CIP) and Climate Action Plan (CAP), school district engagement, and prioritizing of bicycle facilities based on safety, connectivity, and usability. On April 23, 2024, the La Mesa City Council adopted the LRSP by Resolution No. 2024-046.

The completed LRSP provides a data-driven framework for identifying traffic safety concerns, prioritizing locations and improvements, and pursuing funding for safety projects. To maintain eligibility for HSIP grant funding, Caltrans requires local road safety plans to be updated at least every five years. Because the existing LRSP relies on collision data from 2015 through 2019, an update is necessary to incorporate more recent data and support future grant funding.

DISCUSSION:

The LRSP is a citywide, data-driven assessment used to identify traffic collision trends, evaluate safety needs, and prioritize improvements. The existing LRSP analyzed collision data from 2015 through 2019 using State and local sources, including UC Berkeley’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and the La Mesa Police Department’s Crossroads database.

An updated LRSP will analyze collision data from the more recent five-year period of 2021–2025. Calendar year 2020 will be excluded because COVID-19 significantly affected travel patterns and traffic volumes.

Staff recommends awarding a task order to Strada Traffic Engineering based on the firm’s experience in recent years providing traffic engineering services to the City and its familiarity with La Mesa’s transportation system, traffic safety needs, and operational requirements. La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070a (6) authorizes the City Council to waive competitive bidding requirements when a firm has previously performed similar or equivalent work for the City in a satisfactory manner, and the proposed work is within the same or substantially similar scope of services.

Updating the LRSP will support the City’s Vision Zero goals by identifying collision trends and potential countermeasures and prioritizing future safety improvements.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution waiving competitive bidding requirements pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070a (6) and awarding a $69,800 task order to Strada Traffic Engineering for updating the LRSP.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: October 13, 2026
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
_Michael
Kinnard________________
Michael Kinnard
Engineering Project Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Strada Traffic Engineering Proposal

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AWARDING A TASK ORDER TO STRADA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TO

UPDATE THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has a strategic goal to maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe and to invest in infrastructure to serve the needs of the community;
WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa is committed to a Vision Zero plan to improve the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and other active transportation modes and to reduce traffic deaths and injuries to the maximum extent possible; WHEREAS, an update of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is required for eligibility for Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funds;
WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding a task order to Strada Traffic Engineering based on the firm’s prior experience and familiarity with the City’s transportation system, safety needs, and operational requirements;
WHEREAS, La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070a (6) allows the City Council to waive bidding requirements when a firm has previously performed similar or equal work for the City; and
WHEREAS, $69,800 is available in the current fiscal year budget in Account No. 3106-6430, Professional and Specialized Services, for the cost of updating the LRSP.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the City Council does hereby authorize waiver of bidding requirements pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Section 2.40.070a (6), and adopt a resolution awarding a task order to Strada Traffic Engineering in the amount of $69,800 for updating the Local Road Safety Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of October 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2026-__, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

PROPOSAL
Project: City of La Mesa Local Road Safety Plan Update and HSIP Evaluation Data Program Prepared for: City of La Mesa, Department of Public Works Prepared by: Strada Traffic Engineering (A Wisherwill LLC venture) Date: September 1, 2026

PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Base fixed fee of $69,800 in two phases. Phase 1 delivers the HSIP evaluation data package to Caltrans in October 2026, ahead of the November 2 Cycle 13 deadline; Phase 2 delivers the final LRSP Update Report in Q1 2027, with Council adoption at the first available date following. Optional add-on services are individually priced and electable by purchase order amendment. The October delivery requires authorization at the September 22, 2026 Council meeting. This proposal is valid for 90 days.

1. Purpose
Strada Traffic Engineering is pleased to submit this proposal to update the City of La Mesa's Local Road Safety Plan and to produce the HSIP before and after evaluation data requested by Caltrans District 11.

The team, approach, and qualifications are as presented in the Statement of Qualifications submitted August 20, 2026, which this proposal incorporates by reference.

The program is structured in two phases so the most time-sensitive work lands first. Because four of the five constructed HSIP projects are citywide programs, the evaluation data Caltrans has requested is produced practically through the crash-database rebuild this update performs. Phase 1 delivers that package in October 2026, ahead of the November 2 Cycle 13 deadline. Phase 2 carries the update through screening, priority locations, and adoption. Optional add-on services are priced separately so the City can elect them individually.