La Quinta City Council
June 7, 2022

Coral Mountain Resort EIR
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis
Based on a review of these government databases and consideration of the past agricultural history of the site, no significant impacts were identified in the City’s EIR.

While preparation Phase I and II ESAs and incorporation of information from ESAs is not required by CEQA or the CEQA Guidelines, a Phase I ESA of the Project site completed in August 20181 and a Phase II ESA2 completed in September 2018 have been provided to the City of La Quinta to provide additional information on the presence of pesticide and herbicide residue on the Project site. The Phase I ESA documents the historical use of the site for agriculture and the Phase II ESA includes the results of analysis of soil samples collected from the Project site. The soil samples were tested for the presence of Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). OCPs detected in these soil samples included DDE, DDT, DDD, Dieldrin and Chlordane. None of the concentrations detected for any of these OCP compounds exceeded the Regional Screening Level for Residential [RSL‐R], a US EPA guideline for evaluating whether concentrations pose a health hazard for residential land use. In other words, the Phase I and Phase II ESAs confirm the conclusion in the EIR that development of the project site does not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Total DDT (TDE), which is the additive sum of the DDT, DDE and DDD concentrations, is the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) that defines whether a compound constitutes regulated waste under California law. Some of the soil samples exceeded the TTLC for TDE, which means that any off-site transport or disposal of the soil would require further testing to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. It is important to note that the TTLC is not a threshold that indicates the concentrations pose a health hazard for development or residential land uses. Rather, exceeding this limit affects how that soil that may be exported from the site. Because soil on the site may exceed the TTLC for TDE, the Phase II ESA recommends that any soil planned to be exported off the current site be tested for OCPs prior to export. If found to exceed regulatory limits, the soil should be manifested appropriately to comply with applicable regulations on the handling and transport of regulated waste under California law.

The results of the Phase II ESA soil investigations support the conclusion in the Draft EIR that the potential presence of pesticide and herbicide residue on the Project site will not result in any potentially significant human health impacts.

In addition, the Phase I ESA provides further evidence that the Project site poses no other significant health hazards, including from soil contamination from petroleum products. This report found no evidence of “the presence of drums, storage tanks, drywells, potential PCB-containing equipment (such as transformers). sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic systems” (p. 1 Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California, August 3, 2018, Earth Systems Pacific. 2 Revised Report of Preliminary Phase II Investigation for Organochlorine Pesticides 377.206 Acres West of Madison W of Madison Street, S of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California, Revised September 17, 2018, Earth Systems Pacific.

Coral Mountain Resort EIR
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis
19). The only recognized environmental conditions (RECs) identified in the Phase I report are the potential for hazardous pesticide residue in the soil (which was further evaluated and determined to not pose a health risk, as described above), and typical conditions that are addressed through compliance with standard regulatory requirements (abandoned water wells, lead based paint, and the potential for underground storage tanks). By way of example, if the prior farming operations included an underground fuel storage tank (even though the report found no evidence of such USTs), and that UST was discovered during grading or other ground disturbing activities, existing regulations require a removal permit issued by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, removal by a licensed contractor with hazardous substance certification, and inspection, testing and reporting in compliance with County and State requirements (see, e.g., California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2672, and Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Material Management Division, Informational Bulletin on “Underground Storage Tank Guidelines to Closure by Removal”).

Mr. Tsai’s April 26, 2022 letter also asserts that the City’s EIR should include an evaluation of the Project’s construction workers’ potential occupational exposure to any contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) that may be present on the Project site while building the Project, including exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) to address the potential for health risk impacts. However, there is no evidence of the existence of such contaminants on the Project site, nor are these contaminants consistent with the prior or current uses on the site.

The attached Center for Disease Control (CDC) fact sheet on Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) states that per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of chemicals used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. Fluoropolymer coatings can be in a variety of products.

These include clothing, furniture, adhesives, food packaging, heat-resistant non-stick cooking surfaces, and the insulation of electrical wire. This factsheet states that PFAS persist in the environment and exposure in people can occur by consuming PFAS-contaminated water or food. Exposure may also result by using products that contain PFAS.

It is important to note that the exposure pathways to PFAs identified by the CDC do not include exposure to PFAs in soil. Since PFAs are chemicals used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products, these chemicals would not have been used in the practice of agriculture and, for this reason, there is no information or evidence that these chemicals may be present in soil on the Project site or that short term exposure to these substances during construction activities could result in any health risks to construction workers. For these reasons, no evaluation of the potential for health risk impacts from the potential presence of CECs is required in the City’s EIR as there is no evidence of either the presence of CECs on the Project site or the potential for significant health risk impacts from CECs.

Statement of Qualifications
2022

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5/ Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Meridian Consultants LLC is an industry leader in the fields of community, environmental, and natural resource planning. Meridian Consultants offer a diverse experience in assisting public agencies, private businesses, and landowners throughout California in meeting the challenges of entitlement and regulatory compliance.

Our team has extensive experience in land use planning, environmental review, and natural resource management.

Our experience includes the successful environmental review and entitlement of some of the largest and most complex projects in California. Meridian also assists our clients with processing local, state, and federal permits under a variety of regulations; stakeholder outreach; mitigation implementation; and the preparation of a wide range of supporting technical studies.

Meridian has expertise in the preparation of a broad range of environmental documents to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our team has consistently been at the forefront of emerging issues, such as climate change and water supply sustainability, and we are regularly sought out for our CEQA expertise and technical capabilities to address complex and controversial projects.

Our partners have an extensive history of successful work on major projects subject to intense public and legal scrutiny. Our technical expertise and experience is matched by our ability to communicate planning and environmental information in well-organized and straightforward reports and presentations that produce successful outcomes.

Experience.

Expertise.

Excellence.

Firm Profile

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Meridian Consultants provides its clients with a wide range of services including:
• Strategic Compliance Planning and Management
• CEQA/NEPA Compliance
• Regulatory Permitting Services
• Land Use Planning
• Noise Studies
• Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Studies
• Water Rights Permitting Services and Water Banking and Transfer Consulting • Water Supply Assessments and Verifications
• Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring
• Public Outreach and Facilitation
Strategic Compliance Planning and Management
The partners of Meridian Consulting excel at assisting our clients in navigating the environmental compliance process deliberately and strategically. Through hands-on collaboration, we work with our clients to identify key issues and stakeholders and develop a strategy to ensure efficient and timely completion of the various permits, environmental, and regulatory compliance processes required for each project. This includes early evaluation of project constraints and opportunities; dialogue with regulatory agencies and other interested and involved parties; and coordination of scheduling of key tasks and deliverables, such as CEQA documentation and permit applications, to avoid unnecessary delays.

Early input from agency and other stakeholders can help identify ways of modifying a project to reduce environmental impacts and minimize potential cost, schedule, and litigation issues while making sure that project objectives are met. Meridian Consultants assists our clients by identifying all processing and review requirements, technical information needed, and team members required at the beginning of the project. Developing and maintaining project schedules by actively managing the activities of the project team is a primary focus of the Meridian Consultants approach.

CEQA/NEPA Compliance
Achieving CEQA and NEPA compliance are fundamental to the success of our client’s planning and infrastructure projects. Our team has prepared CEQA and NEPA documents for a wide variety of projects throughout California.

We take pride in our ability to turn smaller documents around in a quick, cost-effective manner without sacrificing Services and Expertise

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com quality. Our partners have provided expert and responsive assistance with the full spectrum of CEQA and NEPA compliance documents, ranging from Notices of Exemption or Exclusion to Initial Studies and Environmental Assessments to complex Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), and joint documents for major projects.

Regulatory Permitting Services
As part of our services, we are able to work with a variety of regulatory permitting and agency negotiation services.

We understand the need for efficient and solution-oriented agency coordination and are known for our ability to work productively with resource agency staff. When regulatory permits are required, we are able to call on a combination of outstanding technical expertise and solid regulatory skills, ensuring successful project implementation.

Land Use Planning
Meridian Consultants offer expertise in all aspects of the land use planning process, including preparation and amendment of General Plans and Specific Plans, preparation of land use and project opportunity and constraint studies, identification of entitlements required for projects, and assistance with processing.

Noise Studies
Meridian Consultants has the capability to evaluate noise sources associated with a range of projects, from special events to spectator sports facilities, land development, and vehicle traffic. All measurements are taken in accordance with accepted methodologies such as ISO or ASTM, using Type I/II integrating sound level meters. Evaluations are made in reference to community planning standards, such as local noise control ordinances and the California Model Community Noise Control Ordinance and are based on accepted community noise equivalent level/day-night average sound level (CNEL/Ldn) measurement methodology.

Meridian Consultants utilizes computer models to predict noise impacts from increased traffic volumes or other activities associated with proposed land uses. Anticipated noise levels are projected with respect to parcel boundaries or planimetric features and in accordance with applicable regulations or client objectives. Predictive studies may address a variety of variables, such as traffic volumes, vehicle mix, stationary source operation patterns, topographic conditions, and mitigation options.
• Noise level management
• Strategic sampling
• Monitoring
• Predictive modeling
• National, state, and/or local
Register resource
evaluations
• Noise contour mapping
• Attenuation/Control plans
Meridian Consultants staff has prepared Noise Control Plans as part of mitigation requirements and conducts longterm noise monitoring. We own several noise monitors and related equipment and have the staff available to

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com mobilize and monitor noise on short notice. The Noise Control Plans incorporate the most practical and effective measures to mitigate noise and vibration impacts from the construction activities. Our Plans includes the following elements:
• Noise monitoring with state-of-the-art equipment
• Reporting and availability of monitoring data
• Mapping of sensitive receptors and noise monitoring meter locations • Action levels to evaluate noise from construction operations • Complaint resolution processes
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Studies
Meridian Consultants’ air quality and climate change professionals are a specialized team with an up-to-date and indepth understanding of the complex and evolving regulatory landscape. The services offered include air quality impact assessments for CEQA and NEPA documents, health risk assessments (HRAs), greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, and stationary source permitting and emission inventories.

Our services include:
• Feasibility studies
• Air quality impact assessments (CEQA/NEPA)
• Health risk assessments (HRAs)
• Agency negotiation and litigation support
• Construction equipment loading and emissions
monitoring
• Stationary source permitting and emission
inventories
• Construction dust monitoring
In conducting construction air quality mitigation, the following components are included:
• Assign in-house SCAQMD-certified dust control supervisors • Use meteorological data to assist in selecting the sampler locations • Monitor work area dust using hand-held dust monitors
• Ensure applicable Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) • Obtain Tier certifications for construction equipment as needed • Ensure that air quality monitors provide written records of all dust control measures well as fugitive dust observations and data
• Complete all required SCAQMD forms

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A-5 / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Water Rights Permitting and Water Banking & Transfers
Meridian is a leader in completing water rights permitting and the associate environmental review. As the lead environmental consultant for the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Water Rights Division, we are responsible for assisting the Division with the environmental review of water rights permit applications throughout California.

Our senior staff has experience in water banking and water purchases and transfers. Through a variety of projects, we have worked with water agencies and water banks to address the short and long-term environmental issues associated with these projects. Through our involvement, we have become experienced in the intricacies associated with habitat issues, movement, and storage of water through a variety of methods, water quality and mixing issues, and water rights implications.

Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification
Meridian is recognized statewide as a leading preparer of water supply assessments (WSAs) required under California Water Code Sections 10910 and of water supply verifications (WSVs) required under Government Code Section 66473.7. Meridian has provided water reliability planning for projects in communities across the state, and isregularly sought out to prepare WSAs in areas where water supply is a complex and controversial issue. We provide water reliability planning consulting services as a stand-alone service or as part of a comprehensive package of services that also includes CEQA compliance and other related support.

Mitigation Implementation
Completing CEQA/NEPA compliance and obtaining regulatory permits enables project initiation, but successful project completion requires that mitigation and permit terms be implemented in a manner that meets regulatory requirements while allowing construction to move ahead smoothly. With that in mind, we can provide a full range of mitigation implementation and monitoring services, including “tailgate” training sessions for construction personnel. Our experienced personnel interface effectively with construction, agency, and local jurisdiction staff, providing efficient and economical mitigation implementation.

Public Outreach and Facilitation
We provide stakeholder outreach in support of land use and water planning, infrastructure development, and environmental compliance processes, ranging from individual milestone meetings with specifically designated goals to formulating and implementing comprehensive outreach programs. CEQA and NEPA establish minimum requirements for public dialogue, and for some projects additional outreach can be essential to project success, offering a powerful tool to build trust at project initiation, and providing the opportunity to resolve issues if opposition is identified during the process. For each project, Meridian staff works closely with our clients to develop and implement a carefully coordinated program of services designed to achieve the specific objectives of the project.

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Leadership
The leaders of Meridian Consultants are:

Tony Locacciato, AICP
Group Leader, Planning and Environmental Compliance Practice Joe Gibson
Group Leader, Water and Natural Resources Practice
Christ Kirikian
Group Leader, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Noise Assessment Practice The partners of Meridian Consulting have worked together for more than 15 years and have complementary skill sets and experience.

Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
Mr. Locacciato is an urban and regional planner with 40 years of diverse experience in planning and environmental analysis. His background in consulting, public sector planning, and private development results in an understanding of the relationships between land use regulations, environmental impacts, and the implementation of projects.

Mr. Locacciato has experience in land use planning; land use studies; the preparation of Specific Plans, Master Environmental Assessments, Program and Project Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Supplemental EIRs and Addendums to EIRs, Initial Studies, and Mitigated Negative Declarations; and site feasibility and constraints analysis.

He also has provided a wide range of environmental consulting services, including preparation of EIRs, review of EIRs, and direction of mitigation monitoring programs, to numerous public agencies.

He has been involved in the planning and environmental review of commercial, industrial, residential, and mixeduse projects in both urban and rural settings for communities throughout California, as well as for a wide variety of public infrastructure and public facility projects. His specialty is the management of complex multidisciplinary projects and project teams. As a Partner of Meridian Consultants, Mr. Locacciato provides oversight and direction of projects and directly manages projects.

The Meridian Team

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Joe Gibson
Partner
Mr. Gibson has 35 years of experience managing and conducting environmental studies. He has participated in a variety of projects involving the California Environmental Protection Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for federal, state, and local government and private-sector clients.

Mr. Gibson leads the water and natural resource practice group and has previously served as principal-in-charge for the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) CEQA Efficiency Pilot Project as well as for numerous other water infrastructure and water right application projects. As such, he is experienced in maneuvering projects through the SWRCB application and hearing process, and is considered an expert in the application of CEQA to water resource and permitting projects. Among his specialties are the preparation of water supply assessments/verifications, hydrologic analysis of surface water improvements, and studies requiring analysis of surface hydrology and water quality management.

Mr. Gibson has completed numerous CEQA documents for large-scale development projects in Southern California.

He has also recently served as CEQA Program Director for the Los Angeles Unified School District when he oversaw the preparation of dozens of EIRs for the District’s new school construction program. In addition, he oversaw the development of guidelines for a variety of special studies required for school facilities, including rail safety, pipeline safety, and other issues. Recently, he has managed the preparation of studies for water resource projects for local and state agencies.

Mr. Gibson has experience serving on both elected and appointed boards that have land use responsibilities, including serving as a Planning Commissioner for the City of Thousand Oaks and as a longtime elected Board Member of the Conejo Recreation & Park District. He also serves as Board Member of the California Association of Recreation and Park Districts. Mr. Gibson is currently serving as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee for the California Natural Resources Agency’s (CRNA) Climate Change Adaption Policy Guide (APG). The CNRA, created by an executive order of the Governor, is coordinating with ten different state agencies, scientists, a consulting team, and public stakeholders to develop the first statewide multisector adaptation strategy in the country.

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Meridian Consultants LLC / 910 Hampshire Road, Suite V / Westlake Village, CA 91361 / Tel: (805) 367-5720 / Fax: (805) 367-5733 / www.meridianconsultantsllc.com Christ Kirikian
Principal
Mr. Kirikian is the Director of Air Quality & Acoustics with Meridian Consultants. As a Principal with Meridian Consultants, Mr. Kirikian’s role includes participating at the top level of the organization and reporting to the Board of Managers regarding environmental and planning projects and market initiatives. In addition, Mr. Kirikian’s role as the Director of Air Quality & Acoustics includes securing and overseeing implementation of a variety of air quality and acoustics (noise) projects.

Mr. Kirikian’s experience related to Air Quality and Climate Change includes preparing air pollutant emissions inventories, dispersion modeling, and health risk assessments (HRAs) for residential, commercial, and transportation projects utilizing the CalEEMod and AERMOD models.

Mr. Kirikian’s experience related to Noise includes assessment of a variety of mobile (aviation and vehicle) and stationary noise sources associated with urban development and infrastructure projects, with specific expertise in utilizing SoundPLAN, Aviation Environmental Design Tool, and FHWA TNM models.

Additional roles include serving as an environmental monitoring manager for large-scale compliance monitoring efforts during construction and operation ensuring compliance of all disciplines including air quality, biology permitting, noise monitoring, stormwater management, geotechnical oversight of excavations, cultural resources monitoring and other associated activities.

Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
Practice Group Leader, Environmental Compliance and Planning 920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
About
Mr. Locacciato is an urban and regional planner with 40 years of diverse experience in planning and environmental analysis. His background in consulting, public sector
planning, and private development results in an
understanding of the relationships between land use
regulations, environmental impacts, and the
implementation of projects.

Mr. Locacciato has experience in land use planning; land use studies; the preparation of Specific Plans, Master
Plans, Environmental Assessments (EAs), Program and
Project Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs),
Supplemental EIRs and Addendums to EIRs, Initial Studies, and Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs); and site
feasibility and constraints analysis. He also has provided a wide range of environmental consulting services to cities, including the preparation of EIRs, the review of EIRs, and the direction of mitigation monitoring programs.

Mr. Locacciato has been involved in the planning and
environmental review of commercial, industrial,
residential, and mixed-use projects in urban and rural
settings for communities throughout California as well as for a wide variety of public infrastructure and public
facility projects. His specialty is the management of
complex multidisciplinary projects. Mr. Locacciato
provides oversight and direction of projects and directly manages complex projects.

Education
Bachelor of Science, City and Regional Planning
California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo
Affiliations
American Institute of Certified Planners
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental Professionals
Urban Land Institute
Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
Relevant Project Experience
Project Manager for the Music Festivals Plan EIR in the city of Indio. The project proposed an amendment to the City of Indio Municipal Code to adopt an ordinance
pertaining to Major Music Festival Event Permits; a Major Music Festival Event Permit; and a Development
Agreement. The Major Music Festival Event Permit would
allow an increase in attendance for the Coachella and
Stagecoach Music Festivals and for two events in the fall through 2030. The EIR analysis focused on the potential environmental impacts to local and regional air quality and greenhouse gases, biological resources, land use
compatibility with the surrounding residential
neighborhoods, noise associated with the festival events, public services, and traffic on the surrounding
communities.

Project manager for the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. This EIR evaluated a Specific Plan proposed for an automobile dealership mall on onehalf of this site at Washington Street and Highway 111, and for a major retail commercial center on the other half of the site. Mr. Locacciato was also retained by the City to prepare a Supplemental EIR for this project that addressed a proposed amendment to the Specific Plan to allow for
greater flexibility in the mix of auto-related and general commercial uses on the site. To garner support for the
approval of the retail center component of the project, Mr. Locacciato completed an Addendum to the previous
EIRs that focused on the potential impacts of having a new Super Walmart anchoring this center.

Project director for the preparation of the Glendale Town Center EIR for the Glendale Redevelopment Agency in
Glendale. This EIR provided a comprehensive analysis of a mixed-use commercial and residential project on a key 16- acre site in the center of downtown Glendale. The
Glendale Town Center includes 475,000 square feet of
retail and entertainment uses, with 338 residential units in the upper floors of the buildings. A major objective of this project was to connect major facilities and
development in the downtown area, including the
adjacent Glendale Galleria Mall, the existing retail
development along Brand Boulevard, and the City’s
Central Library by creating pedestrian connections
through the site and the new public park, which would
serve as the centerpiece of the Project. A full project EIR was prepared, and Mr. Locacciato managed all phases of
the environmental review process for the redevelopment
agency. A lawsuit was filed on the adequacy of the EIR, which was found to be adequate by the Los Angeles
Superior Court; and this decision was upheld on appeal.

Project manager for the Burbank Media Center EIR for the City of Burbank. Over a period of 4 years, Mr. Locacciato prepared two project EIRs for a mixed-use project
proposed on a 4-acre site at a key location in the Burbank Media District. As originally proposed, the Burbank Media Center consisted of 925,000 square feet of development, including office uses; a business- and visitor-serving hotel; a health club; a childcare facility; retail space; and a church in 3-, 6-, and 18-story buildings. The first EIR included an analysis of several alternative configurations of uses and buildings on the site. After the original project was not approved, Mr. Locacciato prepared a second EIR for the
City, evaluating four additional development scenarios at an equal level of detail to assist the City in determining the appropriate intensity of development for this site. After completion of the second EIR, the City approved a
residential and retail commercial project.

Project manager for the Warner Bros. Studio Master Plan Expansion EIR for the City of Burbank. Mr. Locacciato
organized and conducted public scoping meetings and
prepared an Expanded Initial Study to determine the
scope of this EIR, which addressed master plans for two separate studio sites in the City of Burbank. The project involved plans to add more than 4 million square feet of new studio facilities over a 20-year period. Traffic,
aesthetics, historical resources, and neighborhood
compatibility were major issues of concern. Mr.

Locacciato also prepared an addendum to this EIR for the City that provided a detailed analysis of a multilevel
parking garage located next to an existing residential
neighborhood.

Project manager for the Wilshire Vermont Joint-Use
project Addendum to the EIR for the Los Angeles
Community Redevelopment Agency and the Metropolitan
Transportation Agency in Wilshire. Mr. Locacciato
prepared a comprehensive addendum to the Wilshire
Center and Koreatown Redevelopment Project EIR
evaluating a mixed-use residential and retail commercial project proposed on the site above the Metro Red Line’s Wilshire/Vermont Station. The project included 444
Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
residential apartments planned in six levels above a
ground level containing approximately 30,600 square feet of retail commercial space. Parking was provided in a 3- story subterranean parking structure containing 732
parking spaces. Reconfiguration of the portal to the Red Line Station was also a part of the project.

Project manager for the Wilshire Boulevard Temple
Master Plan EIR for the City of Los Angeles. This master plan addressed the renovation of the Wilshire Boulevard Temple, designated as a City of Los Angeles HistoricCultural Monument and listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historic
Resources, and the addition of a new school and other
facilities to this key block on Wilshire Boulevard to
accommodate its evolving spiritual, educational,
community, and administrative programs. The main topic
addressed in the EIR was the compatibility of new
buildings with the existing historic building on the site.

Project manager for the University Gateway EIR for the
Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency. This
8-story, 630,000-square-foot residential and commercial building at the northwest corner of the intersection of Figueroa Street and Jefferson Boulevard provided 421
new student apartments designed to accommodate up to
1,656 University of Southern California (USC) students, with retail commercial uses on the ground floor. The
project is located within the Exposition/University Park Redevelopment Project Area and is also part of the
Figueroa Corridor. Key issues associated with this project and preparation of the environmental analysis included
the provision of adequate on- and off-site parking,
consistency with the Exposition/University Park
Redevelopment Plan and the South Los Angeles
Community Plan; impacts on the adjacent historic Shrine Auditorium; aesthetic impacts; and traffic and parking
impacts on the surrounding community.

Project director for the City Center II project in the City of Glendale. This mixed-use residential and hotel high-rise development project includes a 20-story residential tower and an 18-story hotel/residential mixed-use tower. In
addition, a retail/café component is to be provided on the ground floor of the east tower and would open up to the existing City Center I Plaza. A full project EIR was prepared based on direction from the Glendale Redevelopment
Agency. Issues addressed in the EIR included land use and planning, population and housing, aesthetics, geologic
and seismic hazards, hydrology and water quality, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, archeological and
historic resources, hazards and hazardous materials,
public services, utilities and services systems, and
recreation.

Project manager for the Figueroa and Adams Student
Housing project EIR for the City of Los Angeles. This
project involved the development of a residential building containing 137 student housing units and replacement
parking for an adjacent church on Figueroa Street near the University of Southern California (USC). Key issues
addressed in the EIR included historic resources and
aesthetics because of the presence of adjacent historic properties; archaeological resources due to the potential for impacts to a portion of a late 1800s water delivery system, and to encounter buried remains of a circa 1888 residential complex; traffic and circulation; and the effects of construction on air quality and noise.

Project Manager for the Glendale Triangle project EIR for the City of Glendale. The project is a mixed‐use
development containing 218 dwelling units and 54,000
square feet of commercial space with 3½ levels of
subterranean parking. Key issues being addressed in the EIR are construction aesthetics, noise, and parking.

Project director for the California State University,
Northridge (CSUN) Master Plan EIR. The Master Plan for
the 353-acre San Fernando Valley campus was proposed
to enable the University to accommodate the growing
enrollment and broadening range of programs offered on
the campus. The Master Plan addresses the expansion of
academic and administrative facilities; the enhancement of campus open space; the expansion of student housing
and dining facilities; the development of faculty and staff housing; improved vehicle and pedestrian access and
circulation; new parking facilities; and upgrades of campus utilities. The EIR evaluated the overall Master Plan as well as a number of the individual new buildings and facilities included in the Master Plan. Major issues included traffic and circulation, parking, housing, and a range of aesthetic issues, including balancing increased campus
development with retention of open space and the
creation of an attractive, distinct campus identity along the community interface.

Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
Project director for the Brentwood School Education
Master Plan EIR. The Brentwood School, a private K–12
coed day school, currently operates on two separate
campuses located east and west of Sunset Boulevard in
the community of Brentwood, within the City of Los
Angeles. The Master Plan provides for adding
approximately 240,000 square feet of new facilities to
both campuses and guiding land use and development at
the school for the next 25 years. The majority of the new facilities would be added to the East Campus, which
houses the middle and high school; the smaller portion of new facilities would be added to the West Campus, which is home to the elementary school. Key issues relate to the compatibility of the new facilities with the surrounding residential neighborhoods, including visual, traffic, and circulation impacts. Impacts during construction are also being thoroughly assessed to address neighborhood
concerns.

Project manager for the 500-acre East Area 1 Specific Plan EIR for the City of Santa Paula. Over a span of 6 years, Mr.

Locacciato prepared and managed the preparation of the
full range of technical, environmental, and economic
studies to guide the preparation of a Specific Plan and EIR for this project and supported the review and approval of a Sphere of Influence amendment and annexation of this
area by the County of Ventura Local Agency Formation
Commission in March 2011.

Project manager for the Runkle Canyon Specific Plan EIR for the City of Simi Valley. This specific plan was prepared to allow for the development of a master-planned
residential community on 1,595 acres, containing a mix of residential densities, natural open space, a neighborhood park, a multiuse trail system, and an area for a potential future public golf course. The specific plan allows 460 homes on approximately 150 acres in the northern
portion of the specific plan area. Approximately 1,454
acres will remain in open space and recreational uses,
including a 10-acre neighborhood park, 1,150 acres of
natural open space, and approximately 220 acres
designated for the potential future development of a
public golf course. In addition to supporting the adoption of the Specific Plan by the City of Simi Valley, this EIR served as the environmental clearance document for
approval of annexation of this site by the Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).

Project director for the Azusa Pacific University Master Plan EIR for the City of Azusa. This long-range Master Plan provided for the addition of new educational facilities on the east and west campuses located in Azusa. The
objectives of the Master Plan included balancing the uses on both campuses by providing additional student
housing and parking on both campuses in addition to new classroom buildings. Key issues included the compatibility of the proposed increase in intensity of uses on the
campus with existing surrounding neighborhoods and the
proposed redevelopment of the Azusa Drive-In Theater,
which is designated as a historic resource and eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources as the last drive-in theater on historic Route 66 in the state.

Project manager for the Sun City Shadow Hills Master
Plan EIR for the City of Indio. This full-scope EIR, prepared over a 7-month period for the City, evaluated the first major development project proposed in Indio’s Gateway
Conceptual Specific Plan Area in north Indio. The Shadow Hills project consisted of a proposal to develop a private, age-restricted residential community on approximately
800 acres with 2,500 single-family homes, a golf course, and 65 acres of commercial uses. Key issues included
compatibility with the Bermuda Dunes Airport, changes to the General Plan Circulation Plan for north Indio, and the preparation of one of the first SB 610 Water Supply
Assessments (WSA) for a major project served by the
Coachella Valley Water District.

Project manager for the Sun City Shadow Hills Expansion for the City of Indio. This Supplemental EIR evaluated the addition of 305 acres to the Sun City Shadow Hills
community to allow for the development of a third phase.

This full-scope EIR evaluated the proposed development
of an additional 1,200 homes and an 18-hole golf course on the expansion area.

Project manager for the Travertine Point Specific Plan EIR for the County of Riverside. The County of Riverside
certified this EIR and adopted the Specific Plan for this new 5,000-acre master planned community in December 2011.

Travertine Point is a new town planned on the northwest shore of the Salton Sea. The majority of this Specific Plan area is located in Riverside County with a portion located in Imperial County. Portions of the project site also include Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian tribal lands. This comprehensive EIR addresses a Specific Plan permitting
Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
the development of over 16,655 new homes and 5 million
square feet of commercial and light industrial
development. This full scope EIR includes extensive
analysis of traffic impacts, greenhouse gas and other air quality impacts, cultural resource and other impacts, as well as a Water Supply Assessment.

Project director for the 2011 City of Coachella General Plan Update EIR. Mr. Locacciato assisted the City of
Coachella and its General Plan consultant with the General Plan update program by preparing a Program EIR on the
2011 General Plan.

Project manager for the La Quinta Resort Master Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. This EIR addressed a proposed amendment to the Specific Plan for the La Quinta Resort to allow for an expansion of the resort. New facilities were proposed to add 800 new hotel and timeshare units to the existing resort. Proposed buildings in the resort core
included a new four-story hotel/conference center
building. Key issues assessed in this EIR included aesthetic impacts, traffic impacts, and potential historic resource impacts from the proposed intensification of resort
facilities.

Project manager forthe Shadow View Specific Plan EIR for the City of Coachella. This EIR evaluated a residential and retail commercial project proposed on an important 455- acre site located at the entry of the City’s Commercial Entertainment Zone. A full-scope EIR addressed all
potential impacts of the proposed gated residential golf course community and major retail center. Major topics of interest included the consistency of the proposed uses
with the City’s General Plan Land Use and Circulation
Elements. After a new plan was developed for the project, the entire EIR was revised and recirculated for additional public review. Mr. Locacciato also prepared the Specific Plan document for the City.

Project manager for the Desert Lakes Specific Plan for the City of Coachella. Mr. Locacciato prepared a full-scope EIR for this Specific Plan for approximately 2,500 acres located north of the I-10 Freeway. As proposed, the Desert Lakes community was to include 7,300 new homes in three
separate residential villages surrounding a town center containing up to 300,000 square feet of
retail/commercial, office, and high-density residential uses. Services provided include full management of the
environmental review process, including conducting
scoping and agency consultation meetings, and directing the preparation of all technical studies, including traffic, cultural resources, and geology studies. In addition, Mr.

Locacciato coordinated the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment and consultation with Native American tribal representatives on traditional tribal cultural places as required by SB 18.

Project manager for the Country Club of the Desert
Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared a comprehensive EIR for the City of La Quinta for this Specific Plan addressing a 990-acre site located
immediately north of the PGA West Community in La
Quinta. This Specific Plan allows for the development of approximately 525 acres of the 988-acre site as a private golf course country club with three 18-hole golf courses and related clubhouse facilities. Development of
approximately 402 acres with a variety of single-family homes, including custom homes, detached production
homes, detached villas, and attached casitas, is also
allowed by this Specific Plan. After the initial approval of this project, the City retained Mr. Locacciato to prepare a comprehensive Addendum to the original EIR to add 120
acres to the Specific Plan area and to revise the permitted land uses to allow for the development of the site with the Madison Club and Hideaway development projects.

Project manager for The Ranch Specific Plan EIR,
SilverRock Resort Specific Plan, MND, and an Addendum
to this MND for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato
served as the City of La Quinta’s environmental planning consultant on this important 700-acre site located north of the PGA West Community over several years. A
comprehensive EIR was prepared by Mr. Locacciato for a
new resort proposed for this site. Following preparation of this EIR, Mr. Locacciato prepared an MND for
acquisition of this site by the City’s Redevelopment
Agency. Mr. Locacciato then supported the City’s planning and development efforts for this site by preparing a
Specific Plan for the golf course and resort hotel project and an Addendum to MND evaluating this proposed
Specific Plan.

Project manager for The Pointe Specific Plan EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared an EIR for this Specific Plan to guide the development of a residential retirement community on a 43-acre site located adjacent Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
to the Santa Rosa Mountains and south of Highway 111
and west of Washington Street. A comprehensive EIR was
prepared focusing on potential biological resource,
aesthetic, and traffic impacts.

Project director for the Supplemental EIR for Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 281 (Sun City Palm Desert) for the County of Riverside. This EIR evaluated a major
amendment to this Specific Plan to realign major
roadways, other infrastructure, and planning area
boundaries in the northern half of this 1,575-acre Specific Plan area. A comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of this amendment was provided in this EIR.

Managed the preparation of an Addendum to the EIR to
for County of Riverside Specific Plan EIR for the Sun City Palm Desert project to evaluate the impacts of an
amendment to the Specific Plan for the County of
Riverside. In addition, Mr. Locacciato managed the
preparation of an EA and EIR Addendum for the City of
Palm Desert evaluating the impacts of a set of
preannexation actions on the Sun City Palm Desert
project, including a General Plan Amendment, Zone
Change, and approval of a Development Agreement.

Project manager for the Desert Dunes Specific Plan EIR for the County of Riverside. This comprehensive EIR
evaluated the adoption of a Specific Plan by the County of Riverside to allow 2,250 homes to be developed on 475
acres located around the existing Desert Dunes golf
Course located 2 miles north of the I-10 Freeway and 1
mile south of the City of Desert Hot Springs in the
Coachella Valley.

Project director for the Eden Rock Subsequent EIR for the City of La Quinta. Mr. Locacciato prepared this
Subsequent EIR, evaluating a residential development
project proposed for the undeveloped land portion of the PGA West Community. A General Plan Amendment and
Zone Change were proposed to allow 97 multifamily
residential condominiums to be developed on 42 acres in the center of the PGA West Golf Course Community. This
Subsequent EIR updated the information and analysis in
the Final EIR for the PGA West project to evaluate this proposed project.

Project manager for the RiverPark Specific Plan EIR for the City of Oxnard. This EIR evaluated the impacts of the
largest mixed-use project ever approved in Ventura
County. The 700-acre RiverPark project includes 2,800
residential units and 2.8 million square feet of commercial development. The land plan reflects new urbanism
planning principles and incorporates a mixed-use town
center. The project involves the annexation and
reclamation of an existing sand and gravel mine site
located next to the Santa Clara River, a sensitive area for biological resources. Mr. Locacciato directed the
preparation of a full range of detailed technical studies and prepared a detailed full-scope EIR addressing all
topics. Mr. Locacciato also reviewed and directed the
preparation of the Specific Plan by the applicant.

Project manager for the Northwest Golf Course
Community Specific Plan and EIR for the City of Oxnard.

Managed a multidisciplinary team to prepare a specific
plan for the addition of 18 holes to an existing golf course and the creation of a compatible community of 450
homes. The golf course extension was planned on a closed landfill and an amendment of the approved closure plan
was required as well as an adjustment of the sphere of
influence for the City and annexation of the property.

Project manager for the North Shore at Mandalay Bay EIR for the City of Oxnard. Managed the preparation of a
series of technical studies to determine the feasibility of redeveloping a closed oil field waste site for residential uses. A comprehensive consultation process with
responsible agencies was conducted to determine the
scope of the EIR for the project. The EIR evaluated a
proposal for 450 waterfront homes on this 80-acre site in the coastal zone.

Project manager for the Central LA Middle School No. 3
project for the Los Angeles Unified School District in Los Angeles. This EIR evaluated a new 789 two-semester seat middle school in a new 30-classroom building on a 2.5-
acre site above the Metro Red Line Wilshire/Vermont
Station.

Project manager for the Chaffey Community Master Plan
for the Chaffey Community College District in Rancho
Cucamonga. This EIR looked at the Master Plan for
expansion of the main campus on Haven Avenue in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. Major issues included the
impacts of changes in the access and circulation system Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
for the campus and traffic impacts on the streets
surrounding the campus.

Project manager for the Canyon Oaks Supplemental EIR
for the County of Los Angeles. This comprehensive
Supplemental EIR evaluated a revised project proposed
for a sensitive 100-acre site in the Santa Monica
Mountains. Previous proposals for this site had been
under review for over 12 years. Visual impacts, land use compatibility, effect on community character, biology,
grading, geologic stability, and water quality were issues of concern.

Project director for the Mountaingate South EIR for the City of Los Angeles. Mountaingate South is located in a steep canyon area of the Santa Monica Mountains. The
project area totaled 281 acres with development on 61
acres with 29 dwelling units. The remaining portions of the project area are dedicated as permanent open space. A
full-scope EIR was prepared for this project with key issues including plant and animal habitats, fire management, and viewsheds.

Project director for the Sierra Madre Master
Environmental Assessment (MEA) and General Plan EIR in
Sierra Madre. The MEA was compiled to provide
information to the City’s General Plan Advisory
Committee for use during the process of updating the
General Plan. The EIR was prepared after the draft update of the General Plan was completed based on the
information in the MEA.

Project manager for the Commercial Development
Standards EIR for the City of Santa Monica. This EIR
provided a comparative evaluation of 12 different sets of alternative development standards being considered by
the City for all commercial and industrial zones in the City.

Project manager for preparation of the Sun City Tehama
Specific Plan EIR for the County of Tehama. This project proposed the development of a master-planned, mixeduse community including residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The proposed Specific Plan would allow for the development of a total of approximately 4,200
residential units, with the majority (approximately 3,700 units) comprised by an age-restricted retirement
community. Approximately 500,000 square feet of
commercial uses were also initially proposed. Mr.

Locacciato prepared and circulated a comprehensive fullscope EIR for Tehama County and also prepared a revised EIR for recirculation after the project was modified in response to comments on the original Draft EIR. Major
issues include the provision of public services to this planned new community and the impact of the project on
the adjacent I-5 Freeway.

Project director for the Rancho La Sierra Specific Plan in Riverside. Directed the preparation of the Specific Plan document, which incorporated a land plan designed
through a public planning process.

Project manager for the City of Santa Monica Master
Environmental Assessment (MEA) in Santa Monica. This
MEA was prepared during a moratorium on commercial
and industrial development in the City in order to provide a comprehensive source of information on environmental
conditions throughout the City. This MEA also included an analysis of the potential cumulative effects of
development based on a master list of projects for the
entire City. This MEA was prepared based on available
published information and is updated on an annual basis.

Project manager for the College Park project
environmental database for the City of Palmdale. This
database was compiled for a 640-acre site in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to guide the preparation of a Specific Plan for this site and to provide information for the Specific Plan EIR. Planned uses included a community college campus and residential uses. The site was located in a sensitive foothill area adjacent to the San Andreas Fault. Mr. Locacciato also managed the preparation of a Supplemental EIR on this project, which evaluated a set of comprehensive revisions to the Specific Plan.

Project manager for the Arroyo Linda Crossroads Specific Plan EIR for the City of Arroyo Grande. This EIR evaluated the impacts of the development of mixed commercial,
light industrial, and residential uses on a 290-acre site in San Luis Obispo County. The project involved annexing
185 acres to the City of Arroyo Grande.

Project director for the Antelope Valley Enterprise Zone EIR for the Cities of Palmdale and Lancaster and the
County of Los Angeles. This program EIR evaluated the
potential impacts of designating a 28,000-acre area under the jurisdiction of the cities of Lancaster and Palmdale and Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
the County of Los Angeles as an Enterprise Zone. The EIR was prepared within a short time frame based on existing planning and environmental documents previously
prepared by the three jurisdictions.

Project director for the City of Lancaster Master
Environmental Assessment (MEA) and General Plan EIR.

The MEA provided a statement of existing conditions for the city to be used to streamline environmental
documentation of future projects. The MEA is formatted
for the City to update on an as-needed basis. The General Plan EIR analyzes three potential development scenarios, including an expanded sphere of influence area extending to the San Bernardino County line.

Project director for a Program EIR for the City of South Pasadena General Plan Update. The project involved the
update of the City of South Pasadena General Plan with
the exception of the Housing Element.

Project manager for the Douglas Ranch Specific Plan
project for the City of Simi Valley. The Specific Plan
provides for the development of several residential areas and a cemetery on a hillside site.

Project director for the West Main Street Corridor
Redevelopment Master Plan EIR in Alhambra. The project
involved a Master Plan for the redevelopment of a fiveblock portion of West Main Street in downtown Alhambra, as well as the redevelopment of four sites in downtown Alhambra totaling approximately 13.96 acres,
and would result in the creation of nearly 70,000 square feet of commercial uses, 725 residential units, including for-sale condominiums and rental apartments, and
offices. Proposed redevelopment is intended to
complement the previous redevelopment of West Main
Street in the adjacent Civic Center district of Alhambra.

Key project elements include the creation of
comprehensive design standards for use throughout the
West Main Street redevelopment area, the creation of
public open space, a provision of affordable housing, and the relocation of the public library. Major issues to be addressed included aesthetics; traffic and circulation; population and housing, including relocation of existing businesses and residents; and historic architectural
resources.

Prepared an EIR for the City of Simi Valley that evaluated a major amendment to the City’s adopted Whiteface
Specific Plan for the Lost Canyons Specific Plan, which guides development in 1,770 acres of hillside and canyon areas in the northern portion of the City. The Lost Canyons Golf Club currently consists of two 18-hole golf courses in this existing Specific Plan area. The Lost Canyons Specific Plan would allow for the redevelopment of one of these
golf courses into a new residential community containing 365 homes. This comprehensive EIR includes an analysis
of potential impacts with regard to aesthetics, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology, hazards and
hazardous materials, hydrology, land use, mineral
resources, noise, population and housing, public services, traffic, and utilities.

Project manager for the EIR for the Downtown Specific
Plan for the Uptown and Town Center areas of the City of Paso Robles. The goals of the Specific Plan included
continuing revitalization of the City’s historic downtown district while encouraging appropriate infill development.

The EIR evaluated the growth projected to occur under
the new Form-Based Code included in the Specific Plan.

Key issues evaluated in the EIR identify environmental
impacts within five key walkability sheds, which represent the extent of the distance a typical pedestrian will walk (approximately 5 minutes or one-quarter of a mile).

Environmental issues evaluated in the EIR will include
impacts to the Salinas River Corridor from Specific Plan implementation, transportation and traffic impacts,
infrastructure improvements, land use and planning,
cultural and historic resources, and public services.

Project director for the Verdugo Gardens EIR in the City of Glendale that evaluated a proposed 24-story residential condominium building, including 287 housing units; 3,600 square feet of ground-floor retail-commercial uses; a
public open space plaza and park; landscaping; lighting; utilities; subterranean and above-grade parking, which
would be screened from public streets with perimeter
housing; and associated amenities. A full project EIR was prepared based on direction from the Glendale
Redevelopment Agency. Issues addressed in the EIR
included land use and planning, population and housing, aesthetics, geologic and seismic hazards, hydrology and water quality, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, archeological and historic resources, hazards and
Tony Locacciato, AICP
Partner
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, California 91361
805.367.5720
hazardous materials, public services; recreation; and
utilities and service systems.

Project director for the Walmart Food Distribution Center EIR for the City of Barstow. This EIR evaluated the
proposed West Barstow Specific Plan No. 4, which
authorizes the construction and operation of a 1-millionsquare-foot regional food distribution center on approximately 145-acres of land in Barstow. Topics
evaluated in this EIR included aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation,
transportation and traffic, and utilities and service
systems.

Project manager for the Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Specific Plan EIR for the City of Thousand Oaks. This
proposed Specific Plan addressed more than 275 acres
within the core of the City of Thousand Oaks along 3.5
miles of Thousand Oaks Boulevard. This Specific Plan
regulates the mix of land uses, heights, setbacks, and
parking requirements allowed within the Specific Plan
Area and contains new development standards allowing
mixed-use projects, increased height and density, and
master planned streetscape and landscape standards to
improve the visual and pedestrian character of the
Boulevard. The EIR evaluated the potential impacts of up to 1.1 million square feet of commercial development and 370 housing units within the Specific Plan area.

Project manager for the NBC Studios Master Plan EIR for the City of Burbank. The Master Plan was designed to
meet the changing needs of NBC and the media sector.

The master plan included six new studios, each consisting of approximately 23,000 square feet and four 15-story
office buildings, and each containing approximately
475,000 square feet of space. Required parking was
provided through the construction of multilevel parking structures, which included more than 7,000 spaces.

Development of these facilities was phased to meet the
business needs of NBC. This EIR was prepared and
certified within 7 months.

Sunrise Company
300 Eagle Dance Circle
Palm Desert, California 92211
File No. 300300‐005
Doc. No. 18‐08‐702
Report of Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California
August 3, 2018
Submitted By:

Earth Systems Pacific
79811B Country Club Drive
Bermuda Dunes, California 92203
©2018 Earth Systems Pacific
Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Earth Systems Pacific.

August 3, 2018 File No. 300300‐005
Doc. No. 18‐08‐702
Sunrise Company
300 Eagle Dance Circle
Palm Desert, California 92211
Attention: Mr. Phillip K. Smith
Subject: Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project: 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California
Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] has completed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA] of the site referenced above.   This report was prepared for your exclusive use.  It was prepared to stand as a whole and no part should be excerpted or used in exclusion of any other part.   This project was conducted in accordance with our proposal dated July 6, 2018 and authorized on July 12, 2018.  Thank you for this opportunity to be of service.  If you have any questions regarding this report, or the information contained herein, please contact this office at your convenience.

I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10.  I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject site.  I have endeavored to perform this project in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312.

Respectfully submitted,

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Alexander Schriener, Jr., PG 7198
Associate Geologist
ESA/asj/klm/cgj
Distribution: 6/Sunrise Company
1/BD File

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Report of Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California
August 3, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Project Information................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work ................................................................................... 1

1.3 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2

1.4 Qualifications.......................................................................................................... 3

1.5 Exclusions and Data Gaps....................................................................................... 3

1.6 Limitations and Reliance......................................................................................... 4

2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 5

2.1 Size, Location, and Name........................................................................................ 5

2.2 Assessor’s Parcel Number(s)................................................................................... 5

2.3 Township, Range, Section....................................................................................... 5

2.4 Site Boundaries....................................................................................................... 5

2.5 Current Development and Access .......................................................................... 6

2.6 Zoning/Land Use Records....................................................................................... 6

2.7 Site Topography ...................................................................................................... 6

2.8 Surface Water Bodies ............................................................................................. 6

2.9 Geology and Hydrogeology..................................................................................... 6

3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................ 7

3.1 Onsite Observations................................................................................................ 7

3.2 Site Vicinity Observations....................................................................................... 8

4.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION.......................................................................................... 8

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW ...................................................................................................... 11

5.1 Agency Database Search Report........................................................................... 11

5.2 California EPA, State Water Resources Control Board ......................................... 12

5.3 California Department of Toxic Substances Control............................................. 12

5.4 Tribal Records ....................................................................................................... 12

5.5 Engineering and Institutional Controls................................................................. 12

5.6 Environmental Cleanup Liens ............................................................................... 12

5.7 CA Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Maps......... 12

5.8 Riverside County Building Department Records .................................................. 13

6.0 INTERVIEWS, GENERAL RESEARCH, AND PRIOR REPORTS .......................................... 13

6.1 Current Owners/Occupants/Operators................................................................ 13

6.2 Past Owners/Occupants/Operators ..................................................................... 13

6.3 Owners/Occupants of Neighboring Properties .................................................... 14

6.4 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health...................................... 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued ii

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

6.5 Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office .......................................... 14

6.6 Common Farm Irrigation Materials...................................................................... 14

6.7 Other Sources of Information............................................................................... 15

6.7.1 2006 ESSW ESA ......................................................................................... 15

6.7.2 2006 ESSW Supplemental Pesticide Sampling.......................................... 16

6.7.3 2006 ESSW ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling ............ 16

6.8 Prior Experience Regarding Pesticides at Farms................................................... 16

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................. 17

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................. 19 Appendix A Figures
Appendix B Photographs
Appendix C Agency Database Search Report
Appendix D     Additional Documentation
Appendix E Qualifications Statement
Appendix F Reliance Form

August 3, 2018  ‐ 1 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Information
This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA] conducted by Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] for 377.206 acres located west of Madison Street, south of Avenue 58, and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California [the site].  This project was conducted for Sunrise Company in accordance with our proposal dated July 6, 2018 and authorized on July 12, 2018.   We understand that you propose to develop the site for residential purposes.   This project has been performed at the request of the client for due diligence purposes.   Earth Systems conducted a 2006 ESA, 2006 Supplemental Pesticide Sampling, and 2007 ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling.  Portions of those prior reports were used for historical background for this ESA.   We are not aware of special requirements for this ESA.

1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work
The purpose of an ESA is to evaluate the potential for the presence of soil or groundwater contamination that may be present because of the past use, handling, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or petroleum products on or near the property.  The scope of work for this evaluation is based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency Final All Appropriate Inquiry Rule (2006) [US EPA AAI]; and, the ASTM Standard E1527‐13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, and consisted of the tasks listed below.

Site Reconnaissance:   This involved a visual reconnaissance of the site, noting physical evidence of potential contamination or possible sources of contamination; and observation of adjacent properties to identify readily observable visual evidence of possible impacts to the subject site.  Figures depicting the site location and layout are presented in Appendix A.

Significant onsite features were photographed to document current conditions.  Selected site photographs are presented in Appendix B.

Records Review:   Records regarding the regulatory status and history of the site were evaluated regarding the possible presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions [REC].

Regulatory agency records were reviewed by obtaining a report listing known sites that generate, store, use, and/or have released hazardous materials from a firm that specializes in maintaining a database of this type of information.  A copy of the agency database search report is presented in Appendix C, and is discussed in Section 5.1.  The search radius for the agency database search was in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM standard E1527‐ 13 as measured from the approximate property boundary.  Other sources of information are listed in the references section of this report and may include the following categories of information (note that each category is utilized at the discretion of Environmental Professional [EP] until, in the EP’s opinion, sufficient data has been obtained):
 Historical aerial photographs
 Topographic maps
 California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources maps August 3, 2018  ‐ 2 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
 Fire insurance maps
 Land title information
 Local street directories
 Zoning/land use records
 Engineering and institutional controls, such as deed restrictions and restrictive zoning to a radius of ¼ mile, if contained in publicly available lists/registries  Tribal records of subject property and adjoining properties (if tribal land)  Local government records such as building department files  Environmental cleanup liens
 Prior reports
If the property was not previously developed, sources such as building department files and street directories were not reviewed.    Relevant supporting documents are provided in Appendix D.

Interviews:   Persons familiar with the site were interviewed (if possible) regarding the potential presence of RECs on the site or in a position to affect the site, including the site owner/operator/occupant, former site owners/operators/occupants (if reasonably accessible), neighboring property occupants (if the site is abandoned), and selected government personnel likely to have information regarding environmental conditions at or near the site.  Information from persons who were successfully contacted is presented in Section 6.

Report Preparation:   This report was prepared to present our findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

1.3 Definitions
ASTM E1527‐13 provides definitions for 102 terms and 27 acronyms used in the ESA process.

Earth Systems endeavorsto use these terms and acronyms within the meaning provided by ASTM E1527‐13.  The majority of these terms are either obvious in their meaning or are seldom used in this report, but a few are significant enough to warrant defining here, as follows:

Site: The term “site” is used in place of the term “property” as defined by ASTM E1527‐13, and is the physical location that is the subject of the assessment.  The site can include more than one parcel of land, or only a portion of a parcel of land, depending on the needs of the client.  ESAs focus primarily on activities that occur within the boundaries of the site, or that could potentially affect conditions and activities within the boundaries of the site.  RECs on offsite properties that are not likely to affect the site are not considered to be RECs for the subject site.

Recognized Environmental Condition [REC]: the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to a release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under August 3, 2018  ‐ 3 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.  The term does not include de minimis conditions.

Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition [CREC]: An REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum projects allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.

Historical Recognized Environmental Condition [HREC]:   A past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (such as use restriction).  HRECs are no longer RECs for a site.

De minimus: A condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.

Environmental Professional [EP]: An EP is defined by US EPA AAI as “a person who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (of hazardous substances) on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors (of the rule).”   Specific minimum credentials are required by US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 to be identified as an EP.

User: The “user” of the report is defined by ASTM Practice E1527‐13 as the party for whom the assessment is being conducted (the “client”), not the EP.

1.4 Qualifications
Work on this project was performed under the direct supervision of an Environmental Professional [EP], in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 requirements.  Mr. Alex Schriener, Jr. (PG) was the lead EP, the project manager, conducted the site reconnaissance, and provided senior review.   Ms. Kirsten Murch, Project Geologist, conducted historical aerial photograph review, other historical review, and agency database review.   A qualifications statement regarding the personnel who performed this evaluation is presented in Appendix E.

1.5 Exclusions and Data Gaps
The scope of work for this ESA did not include testing the air, groundwater, soil, or building materials for the presence of hazardous constituents.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 4 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
The US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 require that gaps in the data used in evaluating the site be identified.   Data gaps encountered in this project, and their significance to the project, are summarized below.
 As stated in the proposal, land title information would only be reviewed if furnished by the Client.  Land title information was not provided to Earth Systems, and therefore was not reviewed.   Because of the availability of other data sources, the lack of title information is not considered to be significant.
 Prior owners, operators, or employees of the site could not be contacted to be interviewed.  Based on the 2007 Earth Systems Southwest ESA Update this data gap is not considered significant “since agricultural operations on‐site had ceased by 1990 and these parties would be unlikely to have information regarding historical agricultural usage of the site.”
 City building department records were requested.  The results of that file review were not available by the time this report went to publication.  This data gap could be considered significant if records provided information about farm‐related features onsite.  Historical street directories were not requested.   This data gap is not considered significant due to the site’s historical usage for agriculture and residences.  Sanborn maps were not available for the site.   This data gap is not considered to be significant due to the availability of information from other sources.

Recommendations concerning these data gaps are presented in the Recommendations section of this report.

1.6 Limitations and Reliance
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Sunrise Company.   Other parties participating in the transaction for which this project was conducted may also use the information presented in this report, provided said parties agree that Earth Systems shall have no additional liability arising from such use than described in the contract under which this project was conducted.  Any other use of or reliance on the information and opinions contained in this report without the written authorization of Earth Systems is at the sole risk of the user (to apply for written authorization to rely on thisreport, please complete and submit the application provided in Appendix F).

Note that the conclusions and recommendations rendered in this report are opinions based on readily available information obtained to date within the scope of the work authorized by the client, and apply only to site conditions as of the date of the site visit.  The scope of work for this project was developed to address the needs of the client as part of a property transaction (purchase, sale, refinance, etc.) and may not meet the needs of other users.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 5 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
It should be noted that any level of assessment cannot ascertain that a property is completely free of chemical or toxic substances.  We believe the scope of work has been appropriate to allow the client to make an informed business decision.  According to US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13:
the “shelf life” of an ESA report is six months; an “Update” can be provided to the client within the first year of the report’s publication (at an additional cost); and if the report is older than one year, the ESA should be re‐conducted.  Changes in site conditions can render this report obsolete within a shorter period of time.  Use of this report outside of these time frames or after site conditions have changed is at the sole risk of the user and without liability and legal exposure to Earth Systems.

The results contained in this report are based upon the information acquired during the assessment, including information obtained from third parties. Earth Systems makes no claim as to the accuracy of the information obtained from others.  In addition, it is possible that variations exist beyond or between points evaluated during this assessment, and that changesin conditions can occur in the future due to the works of man, contaminant migration, variations in rainfall or temperature, a broadening of knowledge, changes in regulatory standards, and/or other factors not apparent at the time of the field investigation.

The services performed by Earth Systems have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the site vicinity.  No warranty, express or implied, is offered.

2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION

2.1 Size, Location, and Name
The site consists of 377.206 acres of land located west of Madison Avenue, south of Avenue 58, and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California.  The site is not known by a particular name, though it has been referred to as Andalusia West in some correspondence we have received.  The site location is depicted in Figure 1.  The site layout is depicted in Figure 2.

2.2 Assessor’s Parcel Number(s)
The site is identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 764‐200‐076; 764‐210‐007, ‐028, and ‐029; 766‐070‐003, ‐006, and ‐012; and 766‐080‐001, ‐002, ‐004, and ‐005.  A copy of the report from the Riverside County Information Technology Geographic Information Services [RCIT] website is included in Appendix D.

2.3 Township, Range, Section
The site is located across much of Section 28 and across approximately 35 acres of the west quarter of Section 27, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian.

2.4 Site Boundaries
The property boundaries are defined by Avenue 58 to the north; Madison Street to the west, and Avenue 60 and a levee along portions of the south.  The west boundary was not demarcated.  For August 3, 2018  ‐ 6 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
the purposes of this report, the west boundary was estimated based on the RCIT map with aerial photo, which depicts APN boundaries.

2.5 Current Development and Access
The site is former agricultural and undeveloped land accessed from Avenue 58 to the north and Madison Street to the east.  Four building sites, one with a dilapidated structure, and a concrete pad are onsite.  Dirt farm roads cross the site in a grid pattern.  Smaller trails or ATV tracks are scattered across the north and west portions of the site.

2.6 Zoning/Land Use Records
Zoning/Land Use information was obtained from the City of La Quinta Planning Division website, which indicated that the property usage is designated as Golf Course – GC, and Residential – RL.

2.7 Site Topography
The surface of the site slopes uniformly to the east at a slight angle.  The elevation of the site ranges from about sea level in the west to about 45 feet below mean sea level in the east.

2.8 Surface Water Bodies
Surface water bodies are not present on the site, either as lakes or streams.  Rain water appears to infiltrate within the site.   The nearest surface water body is Lake Cahuilla, ¼ mile west‐ northwest, and hydrogeologically up‐gradient of the site.  Water bodies are not located in a position to be readily affected by contaminants released at the site.

2.9 Geology and Hydrogeology
The site is located in the Coachella Valley of Southern California.  The Coachella Valley is part of the tectonically active Salton Trough, which is a closed, internally draining basin bound by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest; the San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest; and the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains to the northeast and east.

These mountain ranges, and the basement rock underlying the Coachella Valley, are primarily composed of granitic and metamorphic rock.  Within the Coachella Valley, the basement complex is overlain by a series of unconsolidated and semi‐consolidated continental clastic sediments eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges; lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla; and wind‐blown sand deposited in the active blow‐sand area of Riverside County (DWR, 1964).  The site is located on lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla.

The northwest trending San Andreas fault zone is the major geologic feature of the Coachella Valley.  The Banning, Mission Creek, and Garnet Hill faults, which are part of the San Andreas fault system, divide the Coachella Valley into four distinct hydrogeologic subbasins.   Each subbasin is further divided into subareas, based on either the type of water‐bearing formation, water quality, areas of confined groundwater, forebay areas, groundwater divides, or surface water divides.  The site is located within the Thermal subarea of the Indio subbasin.  This subarea consists of the confined portion of the Indio subbasin, where water from the up‐gradient Palm August 3, 2018  ‐ 7 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Springs subarea moves into the interbedded sands, silts and clays underlying the central portion of the valley.  Groundwater in this subarea generally flows in a southeasterly direction toward the Salton Sea.  The water‐bearing materials in this area have been divided into four units:  a semi‐perched zone at the ground surface and extending to a depth of up to 100 feet below ground surface [bgs]; an upper aquifer which is 150 to 300 feet thick; a lower aquifer in excess of 500 feet thick; and an aquitard between these two aquifers which is 100 to 200 feet thick.  The semi‐perched zone may be the uppermost water‐bearing zone under the site.  Water quality within this zone is generally poor.  The deeper and upper aquifers are typically used for water supply.  Throughout the Thermalsubarea, the horizontal permeability isseveral timesthe vertical permeability resulting in a predominantly lateral flow of groundwater (DWR, 1964).

The depth to groundwater at the site was evaluated by contacting Mr. Saul Montalvo with the Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD].  Mr. Montalvo indicated that the depth to groundwater in the CVWD production well located approximately 0.3 miles south of the southeast corner of the site was 67.8 feet below ground surface [bgs] on June 26, 2018.  Note that the CVWD obtains depth to water information from production wells that tend to tap deeper aquifers and may not represent uppermost groundwater.  Note that CVWD recharge basins are located 0.1 milessouth of the site.

3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

3.1 Onsite Observations
Earth Systems personnel visited the site on July 17 and 18, 2018, to observe current site conditions and adjacent land use.   Photographs of selected onsite features are presented in Appendix B.  A summary of our findings is presented below.  The site was observed to consist of former agricultural fields and undeveloped desert (Photos 1‐3).  Native vegetation was established throughout the site and did not show unusual signs of stress other than from drought.  As shown in photo 3, the agricultural areas appeared to have been unused for many years.
 The 3 building areas and 1 concrete pad identified in the 2006a Earth Systems ESA were found as were the two building sites adjacent to Madison Street (Figure 2).   The 1 remaining building onsite was constructed of hand‐made adobe brick and was in a run‐ down condition (Photo 4).  It is clearly visible in the 1956 aerial photographs for the site, but not visible in the 1939 photograph.
 All‐terrain vehicle tracks crossed the primarily the southern, central and western portions of the site.  More substantial dirt farm roads crossed the site in a grid pattern.  Minor dumping of debris was found at the edges of the site and near the three former building areas and consisted of landscaping, typical household and construction debris (Photo 5).  Hazardous materials were not observed in the dumped materials.  Several areas of more extensive dumping are identified on Figure 2.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 8 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
 Evidence of the onsite manufacture or storage of hazardous materials was not observed; though small amounts of asbestos concrete [AC] pipe was found at the west, central, and south parts of the site (Photo 6).
 One of the three wellsidentified in the 2006 ESA waslocated.  It was not abandoned.  The other wells were likely hidden under debris or brush.  In discussions with Mr. King, of Andalusia Country Club, he said that two additional water wells were located on the site.

One was associated with a former residence (since removed) located at the southeast corner of the adjacent to Madison Avenue.   That well was capped for future use, according to Mr. King.  The other well was located west of the former ranch house in the southwest corner of the site.   That well was abandoned according to Mr. King.   No documentation was obtained as to the work done on the two aforementioned wells.  Evidence was not observed during the site visit of the presence of drums, storage tanks, drywells, potential PCB‐containing equipment (such as transformers), sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic system.

3.2 Site Vicinity Observations
The site vicinity generally consisted of undeveloped, former agricultural, and residential properties.  Properties adjacent to the site consisted of the following:

North: Developed and undeveloped residential properties East: Andalusia Country Club
South: Former agricultural land; single family residences; partially developed single‐ family residential neighborhoods; and a levee with CVWD recharge basins beyond
West: Undeveloped and mountainous land
Evidence was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities on properties in the site vicinity.

4.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION
Information regarding the history of the site was obtained from various sources, as listed in the references section of this report.  The results of this research are summarized chronologically in the following table.   Footnotes regarding the sources of historical information are provided following the table.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 9 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Table 1 – Summary of Historical Site Usage
Date Source Discussion
1939 2007 ESSW ESA
Update – Aerial
Photo
The site was primarily agricultural land with some undeveloped land along the northwest and south margins.  The immediate vicinity was agricultural land, and undeveloped native desert was in the extended vicinity.  Lake Cahuilla to the northwest had not been constructed at that time.
1‐17‐1956 Earth Systems
aerial photo
archive
The site was primarily agricultural.  The northeast, south and west potions are undeveloped native desert.  The dwelling and farm building in the north central part of the site and the two dwellings to the northeast were visible.  A home east of Madison, that later becomes incorporated into the site when Madison is realigned, is visible. Roadways in the vicinity were unimproved.  The vicinity was agricultural and undeveloped.
1956 USGS
Topographic
map (Valerie
only)
The portion of the site east of the original location of Madison Street was primarily agricultural with buildings near the north center.  The site vicinity was undeveloped or agricultural with scattered dwellings/farm buildings.  Madison Street and Avenue 58 were light duty roads.
1959 USGS
Topographic
map (La Quinta
only)
An unimproved road skirted the northwestern edge of the site south of Avenue

58.   The site vicinity was undeveloped and agricultural land with scattered dwellings.
1972 USGS
Topographic
map (Valerie
only)
Changes are not depicted onsite.  Two buildings had been constructed near the building east of Madison Street.
4‐11‐1973 Earth Systems
aerial photo
archive
Much of the south half of the site was agricultural (fallow or active), though the southernmost, west, and northeast portions appeared to be undeveloped native desert.  Mature native shrubs on the north and northeast portions of the site were aligned in a diagonal pattern – northwest to southeast.  Farm buildings and/or residences were adjacent to Avenue 58, on the east side of Madison Street approximately ¼ mile south of Avenue 58, and near the north central part of the site.  The roadways in the vicinity were dirt.  Properties in the vicinity to the north and east were primarily agricultural (fallow or active) with scattered residences; and undeveloped desert or mountainous terrain to the west. 6‐20‐1974 Earth Systems
aerial photo
archive
The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.
1980 USGS
Topographic
map (La Quinta
only)
Two dwellings were located in the north portion of the site.  Lake Cahuilla to the west‐northwest had been constructed.  A few more dwellings were scattered in the vicinity.
5‐26‐1980 Earth Systems
aerial photo
archive
By 1980, a residence with a U‐shaped access road was in the northeast portion of the site.  In the vicinity, the parcel north of the northwest corner of the site had been cleared and developed with what appears to be a nursery. 1981 USGS
Topographic
map (Martinez
Mountain only)
Approximately 100 acres of the east half of the site was agricultural with unimproved farm roads.  Unimproved roads crossed the southwest portion of the site and generally paralleled an aqueduct/water pipeline.   A second aqueduct/water pipeline crossed the center of the site from west to east.  A farm building and a dwelling were located near the north central part of the site, approximately 400 feet apart ¼ mile south of Avenue 58.  Fences throughout the site appear as red or red and black dashed lines.   The vicinity was undeveloped or agricultural land.  An intermittent stream was beyond the levee approximately ¼ mile southwest of the southwest corner of the site.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 10 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
1988 USGS
Topographic
map (Martinez
Mountain only)
By 1988 several unimproved roads had appeared onsite.  Two dwellings were in the north portion of the site, one about 650 feet south of Avenue 58 and the second about 200 feet south of Avenue 58.   In the vicinity, more scattered dwellings had been constructed.
9‐25‐1996 Google Earth
aerial photo
Much of the central portion of the site appeared to be former agricultural land.

Undeveloped land was along the west boundary and in the southern portion.

Dirt farm roads in a grid pattern and dirt trails crossed throughout the site.

Madison Street was a two‐lane unimproved road.  Avenues 58 and 60 were unimproved roads.    Dwellings and/or outbuildings or date groves were located near the northeast corner of the site, near the north central boundary, near the northeast corner of the site on the east side of the former location of Madison Street, and at the southeast corner of the site adjacent the Madison Street.   The site vicinity was undeveloped, agricultural, new and older residential (including a horse ranch beyond the southwest corner), and a commercial building beyond the northwest boundary.   Lake Cahuilla Park was less than ½ mile to the northwest.
5‐8‐2002 Google Earth
aerial photo
The site was generally unchanged.  The commercial operation to the northwest was largely reduced and development of properties in the extended vicinity to the north had continued.   Trilogy La Quinta was under development to the southeast.
11‐16 ‐2004 Google Earth
aerial photo
The residences east of the old location of Madison Street had been razed and the lots graded.  Several hundred truckloads of soil had been deposited on the southernmost parcel of the site.  In the vicinity the new location of Madison Street had been established and grading and development of Andalusia Country Club to the east was well underway.
5‐24‐2009 Google Earth
aerial photo
By 2009, the dwellings near the north central boundaries of the site had been razed.  The soil deposit area at the south end of the site appeared to have been graded and dust suppressant applied.   This practice of soil dumping/grading continued through June 2011 (see Section 6.1).  Development of the vicinity and the extended vicinity to the north, east and southeast had continued, including residential grading beyond the northwest boundary of the site.  Water recharge basins had been constructed to the south.
4‐11‐2014 Google Earth
aerial photo
The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.
2‐17‐2018 Google Earth
aerial photo
The site and vicinity were generally unchanged.

Historical information footnotes:

We attempted to obtain historical information from a standard set of resources, including historical aerial photographs, historical USGS topographic maps, Sanborn fire insurance maps, historical street directories, chain‐of‐title documents, city building permit files, and personnel interview.  However, historical information was not obtained from some sources, as follows:

Sanborn Fire Insurance maps: Based on prior research, Earth Systems is aware that Sanborn Fire Insurance maps are not available for the site or vicinity.

Historical City Directories:  Historical Street Directories were not requested due to the relatively recent development of the site vicinity; and due to the primary historical agricultural usage of the site and vicinity.

Chain of Title documents:  Chain of title documents were not provided prior to publication of this report and, therefore, were not reviewed.

City Building Permits were requested but the results of that file search were not available by the time this report went to publication.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 11 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW

5.1 Agency Database Search Report
A report summarizing the information available from regulatory agencies regarding sites that generate, store, use, and/or have released hazardous materials was obtained from a firm that specializes in maintaining a database of this type of information.  The publications reviewed in the database search are referenced in the database report, presented in Appendix C.  The search radii used for each list were in accordance with the US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13 guidelines as measured from the approximate property boundary.   Given the limitations of the agency’s plotting tool, only an approximate boundary of the site could be selected.  In one case, a location offsite was included as an onsite listing and vice versa.  Significant information obtained in the database search is summarized below.
 The site is listed in the database report as follows:
o Riverside Co Fire (Map Key 1): incident located behind 58500 Madison Street (on the east side of the former location of Madison Avenue, approximately 1,400 feetsouth of Avenue 58) is included on the California Hazardous Materials Report System [CHMIRS].   On October 15, 2002, a caller reported that “a construction site unearthed a large dumping area of drug lab waste.”  The administrative agency wasthe Riverside County Department of Environmental Health [RCDEH], cleanup was conducted by “contractor,” and the incident was “contained.”  Given the age of the incident and oversite by RCDEH, this is not an REC.  This is identified as Home 4 in the current report. o Rindlesbach Construction (Map Key 2), located at 59781 Madison Street, is offsite near the northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60.   The facility is listed in the database report as on the Hazardous Waste Information System [HAZNET] database, which documents hazardous waste manifest data.   The facility handles asbestos‐ containing waste.   The California Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC] monitors the HAZNET database.  No problems regarding disposal of hazardous materials are reported for the listing and this is not an REC.
 Two sites within the search radii are listed a total of seven times in the database report, but one of the sites(Andalusia Country Club, aka, Coral Option I LLC (Map Key 3), located at 81120 Avenue 60, east of the Madison Street/Avenue 60 intersection) does not appear to pose a threat to the site due to the distance, direction, or nature of the issues at those sites (such as registered above ground storage tanks or hazardous waste generators with no reported problems).  The remaining site is summarized as follows:
o PGA West (Map Key 4), located at 80202 Avenue 58, is located approximately 0.21‐mile northwest of the subject site.  The site is listed as a Leaking Underground Storage Tank [LUST] and Riverside County Local Oversight Program [LOP] site and the status of the site is “Completed ‐ case closed”.  This is not an REC.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 12 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
 The database search report has nine listings categorized as unmapped, due to vague address listings or the inability of the automated search system to identify the location of the release site.  A review of these listings did not identify them to be within the search radii.

The sites identified in the agency database review do not appear to be RECs for the subject site due to the distance, direction, status, or nature of the issue at these sites.

5.2 California EPA, State Water Resources Control Board The California Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB] GeoTracker website was accessed to research records on file regarding known problems at the site.  Other than the issues discussed in Section 5.1, the database search found no results for the site or properties in the vicinity.

5.3 California Department of Toxic Substances Control
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC] EnviroStor website was accessed to research records on file regarding known problems at the site or in the site vicinity.  Other than the issues discussed in Section 5.1, the database search found no results for the site or properties in the vicinity.

5.4 Tribal Records
This site is not within ¼ mile of tribal land, and therefore Tribal records for the subject property or adjoining properties were not reviewed.

5.5 Engineering and Institutional Controls
Engineering and Institutional Controls [EICs] (i.e. deed restrictions and restrictive zoning) were not identified for the subject site in the agency database search report.   Engineering and Institutional Controls to a radius of ¼ mile were not identified.

5.6 Environmental Cleanup Liens
Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens [ECLs] on a property are indicators that contamination exists or existed at the site.  ECLs are “encumbrances on a property for the recovery of incurred cleanup costs on the part of a state, tribal, or federal government agency or other third party” (EPA 2006).  Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development (site owner) stated that they are not aware of ECLs assigned to the site.

5.7 CA Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Maps The California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal [DOGGR] maps on the DOGGR website were reviewed for information regarding historic oil‐well or geothermal drilling activities near the site.   The maps and databases did not depict permitted oil or geothermal wells within 1 mile of the site.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 13 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

5.8 Riverside County Building Department Records
The RCIT website lists several permits for the site.  Most are permits for residential buildings or upgrades.  The following permits are of interest to this assessment:
 100 amp change of service to pump
 100 amp service to 5 HP well pump
 Trap and skeet buildings
 200 amp service to 15HP and 40HP motor
 Add heaters and electric to greenhouse

6.0 INTERVIEWS, GENERAL RESEARCH, AND PRIOR REPORTS

6.1 Current Owners/Occupants/Operators
Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development [T D] (site owner) was contacted regarding his knowledge of the site.  Mr. Sparks provided the following information:
 T D bought the land November 17, 2000 and “no significant alterations have taken place except the developers of Trilogy to the southeast dumped excess soil from their grading operations on the south end of our land about 15 years ago.”  T D has no knowledge/suspicion of the release of hazardous materials onsite.  T D is unaware of “any previous underground storage tanks and we have not installed any.”
 T D is not aware of ECLs assigned to the site.
 T D is unaware of any septic systems onsite.
 Mr. Sparks recalls that T D abandoned two of the three wells observed onsite at the time of the 2006 ESA Update.  He believes that the third was plugged only in case it was put into use at a later date.
 Mr. Sparks stated that “despite (T D’s) efforts, illegal dumping has occurred” onsite.

6.2 Past Owners/Occupants/Operators
From the 2007 Earth Systems Southwest ESA Update for portions of the site:
“Prior owners(operators or employees) of the site could not be contacted to be interviewed.

Regarding the most recent owners, this is not considered significant since agricultural operations on‐site had ceased by 1990 and these parties would be unlikely to have information regarding historical agricultural usage of the site.   Contact information for owners or operators during the agricultural usage years was not available.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 14 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
This assessment is still pertinent, given that few if any changes have occurred onsite since the 2007 report.

6.3 Owners/Occupants of Neighboring Properties
The US EPA recommends that interviews with persons on adjoining properties be conducted for properties that are “abandoned.”  Mr. Nolan Sparks, Vice President of T D Desert Development (site owner) stated that they monitor the site on a regular basis, but illegal dumping still occurs.

The site is not considered to be abandoned and interviews of owners/occupants of neighboring properties were not conducted.

6.4 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Mr. Paul Mitchell with the RCDEH is currently in charge of overseeing agriculturalsites containing elevated concentrations of pesticide residues.  Mr. Mitchell indicated that pesticide residuesthat resulted from use in conformance with legal requirements at the time of use are not subject to hazardous waste regulations, unless those soils are exported from the site (at which time they become subject to hazardous waste regulations).  However, the RCDEH is concerned that onsite workers and future residents may suffer adverse health effects from the presence of these residues when the agricultural properties are converted to other uses.  The RCDEH has started requiring that Phase II investigations be performed to evaluate whether pesticide residues are present at elevated concentrations.

Note that information regarding leaking underground storage tank and other cleanup sites in Riverside County is available from the State GeoTracker information system (see Section 5.2).

6.5 Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office Ms. Carolyn Brown with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s office [RCAC] was contacted previously for general information regarding pesticide use.  Ms. Brown indicated that the pesticide DDT was widely used throughout the Coachella Valley prior to its ban in the early 1970's.  Consequently, it should be assumed that DDT and/or other organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] could have been used on all properties used for agriculture prior to that time.

6.6 Common Farm Irrigation Materials
Mr. Tom Brickley with Brickley Environmental, an asbestos removal contractor, was contacted during a previous project regarding the use of asbestos piping in irrigation systems.  Mr. Brickley indicated that they have been involved in the removal of asbestos‐containing irrigation piping at numerous sites, and that finding this type of piping common.  He also stated that these pipes are not considered a hazardous material and can be left in place, but are often removed due to engineering and site development considerations.  If the pipes are removed, the removal needs to be performed by a licensed asbestos‐removal contractor and disposed to a permitted landfill following appropriate protocols.   The costs to remove and dispose of the asbestos pipe is dependent upon its condition, but Mr. Brickley stated that pipe in good condition can be removed for an average cost of about $500 to $2,000 per 100 linear feet of pipe.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 15 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Mr. Bob Sheppard with CV Grading, a contractor that installs irrigation systems, was contacted during a previous project for information regarding typical uses of asbestos‐cement [AC] pipe.

He indicated that AC pipe is used in irrigation systems when the pressure is anticipated to exceed the design strength of common concrete pipe.   Commonly‐used concrete pipe has a design strength sufficient for a hydrostatic head of about 20 feet, while AC pipe can have design strengths of 50 to 100 feet of hydrostatic head.   AC pipe is more expensive than common concrete pipe, and therefore AC pipe is usually used only when the head is anticipated to exceed 20 feet of head.  Non‐pressurized, gravity‐feed irrigation systems are usually constructed of non‐ asbestos concrete pipe.

6.7 Other Sources of Information
Earth Systems Southwest [ESSW], a prior entity of Earth Systems Pacific, conducted an ESA and Supplemental Pesticide Sampling in 2006 for portions of the site.  A 2007 ESSW ESA Update was conducted to satisfy the requirements of Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD] for installation of irrigation lines.  Summaries of the three reports, are as follows.

6.7.1 2006 ESSW ESA
Based on a review of historical aerial photos, the 2006 ESSW ESA report indicated that from as early as 1974 until 1990, the majority of the site was used agriculturally.  AC vent pipes were observed associated with the irrigation system on and/or near the site.

However, AC pipe is not normally used subsurface in gravity‐flow irrigation systems and we believe it is unlikely for subsurface AC pipes to be present.  Non‐hazardous debris and trash were observed but did not warrant removal.

The site vicinity was observed to consist of residential, agricultural, golf resort, park, and undeveloped properties.  Three abandoned wells were identified near the subject site, within the boundaries of the proposed Andalusia West development.  The wells appeared to have not been properly abandoned.  One well, located approximately 100 feet east of Lateral E1, was noted to contain a significant layer of oily, odorous liquid above the groundwater level, which is probably lubricating oil dating from prior use of the well.  Due to the off‐site locations of these wells, further investigations of these features do not appear warranted.  Former building areas were noted near the site, but not within the alignments of the existing or proposed laterals.  Evidence of a hazardous materialsrelease was not noted in association with these building areas.  While the building areas may contain abandoned underground storage tanks or pesticide storage or mixing facilities, these building areas were not located in a position to be likely to affect the existing or proposed lateral alignments.  Therefore, further investigations regarding these building areas did not appear warranted in the lateral alignment project.   Evidence was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities in the site vicinity.

The agency database review did not list the site, and sites in the vicinity were not identified to pose a risk to the subject site (ESSW, 2007).

August 3, 2018  ‐ 16 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

6.7.2 2006 ESSW Supplemental Pesticide Sampling
In June 2006, surface soil samples were collected along the irrigation laterals within the West Andalusia Development.  Sixteen samples were collected to evaluate the possible presence of Organochlorine Pesticide [OCP] residues at concentrations of concern in the soil due to the historic agricultural use of the site.  The samples were combined in pairs to yield eight composite samples.  The laboratory results of those analyses indicated that DDT, DDE, DDD, and Toxaphene were detected at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits.  Other OCPs were not detected.  DDE and DDD are by‐products of the breakdown of DDT.  Maximum concentrations of DDT, DDE, DDD, and Toxaphene were less than both (1) the US EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals for residential usage [PRG‐ r] and (2) the California, Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration [TTLC], a California criterion for defining a waste as hazardous.  The analytical results from the June 2006 sampling episode are summarized and included in Table 1.  These results suggested that pesticide residues from those locations do not significantly affect the site.   Further evaluation of this matter did not appear warranted and was not recommended (ESSW, 2007).

6.7.3 2006 ESSW ESA Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling In addition to an Update of the prior ESA and finding no significant changes onsite other than one piece of asbestos‐cement [AC] pipe that should be disposed appropriately offsite, the 2006 ESA Update with Supplemental Sampling included collection of eight soil samples from irrigation lateral locations that were not previously sampled.  The eight samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] and the results show that pesticide residues in some of the samples exceed the TTLC for DDT‐related compounds and/or exceed the PRG‐r for Toxaphene.  The samples with elevated pesticide residue concentrations were from three adjacent blocks of agricultural fields.   Further investigations of these areas were recommended.  Itshould also be noted that evaluation and sampling of the former residential areas was not completed since these were not associated with the lateral realignment.

An evaluation was conducted for the potential presence of subsurface AC pipe that concluded that further investigations did not appear warranted.

6.8 Prior Experience Regarding Pesticides at Farms
The potential presence of pesticide residues is an issue affecting land used for agriculture prior to 1990.  Of primary concern are OCPs, which includes DDT, DDE, DDD, Gamma‐BHC (Lindane), Technical Chlordane, Dieldrin, Endosulfan II, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Lindane, and Toxaphene.

These compounds are notable for both their toxicity and their longevity in the soil.  As such, residues of these compounds can be found at concentrations of concern well after usage of the material has ceased.  Some of these chemicals were widely used well into the 1980’s.

Most OCPs are listed in the California Code of Regulations [CCR] governing the classification of hazardous waste (CCR Title 22).  The Total Threshold Limit Concentration [TTLC] for DDT and its August 3, 2018  ‐ 17 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
breakdown by‐products is 1 mg/kg, which is the concentration of DDT which would classify a waste as hazardous.  The US EPA Regional Screening Level for a residentialsetting [RSL‐r] for DDT is 1.9 mg/kg, for Toxaphene is 0.49 mg/kg; and for Dieldrin is 0.034 mg/kg (US EPA 2016).  The RSL‐r is based on health risks from exposure to the substance in a residential setting for 70 years, and would be an appropriate comparison criterion for assessing the risks posed by pesticide residues to residential occupants of a property.

Earth Systems has conducted numerous Phase II investigations of agricultural sites.  OCPs have been found at concentrations of concern at about ¼ of these sites.  The most common pesticides found at concentrations of concern are DDT, DDE, Toxaphene, and Dieldrin, which were de‐ registered for use between 1972 and 1990.  We have not identified a pattern indicative of where elevated levels of OCPs are found, though spills atstorage areas are more frequent than elevated concentrations in field areas.   The level of concern expressed by the regulatory agencies regarding the potential presence of pesticide residues has increased in the last few years, including the publication of a guidance document by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control [DTSC] concerning sampling of agricultural properties that are proposed to be developed as schools.  That guidance document may become a basis for defining the “standard of care” for the evaluation of pesticide residues on agricultural land.  Given our prior experience with pesticide residues and the increasing focus this issue has received by the regulatory agencies, we believe testing for the presence of OCP residues may appropriate for land that was in use for agriculture after the development of OCPs and prior to 1990, particularly if site usage changes to residential/schools.

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA] conducted by Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] for 377.206 acres located west of Madison Street, south of Avenue 58, and north of Avenue 60, in La Quinta, Riverside County, California [the site].  We have endeavored to perform this ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527‐13.  Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Sections

1.5 and 1.6 of this report.   The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the site for the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions [REC] related to the current or past use, handling, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or petroleum products on or near the subject property.   This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with this property except as discussed in the project summary presented below.   Our findings and conclusions are summarized as follows:

1. The site was observed to consist of undeveloped desert, former agricultural land, and dwelling/farm building sites.

2. Construction and household debris were noted primarily adjacent to the building sites and along the edges of the site.   The debris does not appear to contain hazardous materials and is not considered an REC.

3. Evidence of the onsite manufacture, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials was not observed except that small amounts of asbestos concrete [AC] pipe were found at the west, central, and south parts of the site.  The AC pipe is an REC.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 18 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

4. USTs began to be regulated in California in the 1980’s (at least as early as 1956).  Prior to that time, it was common practice for farms to maintain their own USTs to store fuels for onsite equipment.  Such USTs were often abandoned in place rather than removed when they were no longer used.  Records regarding farm USTs are rarely found in the agency database search.  Evidence of these features was not observed during the site visit.  The concern with USTsisthat a release can occur and not be noticed until the UST isremoved.

USTs are commonly found abandoned in place on older farm properties.  The potential presence of USTs is an REC.

5. Septic systems provide a pathway for contaminants to be released into the ground, if contaminants are disposed into the waste water system.  We did not obtain information that indicates hazardous materials were disposed into the septic system and it is unlikely that the current systems have been used in this manner.   However, this could be a problem in areas where maintenance and repair of farm machinery occurred.  If this issue is of concern, a survey for the old systems including sampling can be conducted to evaluate whether hazardous materials have been released in association with these onsite septic systems

6. The site was used for agriculture prior to 1990.   Since soil sampling and testing for pesticides in prior investigations of the site was limited to locations of irrigation laterals onsite, the potential exists for residues of organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] to be present in other agricultural and building areas of the subject site.   Those prior investigations found areas where the OCPs exceeded the results show that pesticide residues in some of the samples exceed the TTLC for DDT‐related compounds and/or exceed the PRG‐r for Toxaphene.  The potential presence of OCP residues is an REC.

7. The potential exists for AC pipe to have been used in the former irrigation system due to the prior agricultural use of the site.  However, AC pipe is normally used at sites where more than 20 feet of hydrostatic head is anticipated due to topographic relief.  The subject site is relatively flat.   Therefore, the potential presence of subsurface AC pipe is not considered to be a concern at this site, other than as discussed above.

8. County building permits cite service to “pump” and “well pump;” and prior reports cite the presence of three improperly abandoned wells “within the boundaries of the proposed Andalusia West development.”  T D Desert Development (current owner ofsite) abandoned two of the wells, but the wells were not the three wells found in the 2006 Earth Systems studies.  This is an REC.

9. Riverside County Department of Building and Safety cites a permit for “trap and skeet buildings.”  Shooting ranges and the like often have an excess of heavy metals in the soil from spent cartridges.  Evidence of a shooting range was not observed on the site during the site visit.  If this is a concern of you, it can be investigated further.

10. The potential exists for the presence of lead residue from lead‐based paint in the soil around buildings.  This is an REC.

11. The potential exists for the presence of OCPs around buildings, where pesticides were stored or applied around the perimeter of the buildings.  This is an REC.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 19 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

12. Evidence was not observed during the site visit of the presence of drums, storage tanks, drywells, potential PCB‐containing equipment (such as transformers), sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil, stressed vegetation (other than due to weather), or onsite septic systems.

13. The site vicinity consists of primarily agricultural, residential, and golf course properties.

Evidence was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities in the site vicinity.   Between approximately 2004 and 2011, development activities of Trilogy La Quinta included deposition of surplus soil onto the southern parcel of the subject site.

This was done in an organized manner and with the owner’s knowledge and it is unlikely that the soil contained hazardous materials.  This is not an REC.

14. The site was identified in the agency database review.  However, the listings for the site and the site vicinity do not appear to pose a risk to the subject site based on the status of those sites, the distance, or direction from the subject site, or the nature of the issue(s) at those sites.

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
RECs were identified for this site (Section 1.5, and Items 4 through 10 in Section 7).  Further investigations are recommended as follows:
 Data gap of unavailability of City of La Quinta building permit file review: City Building Department record reviews will be provided when those documents become available.  AC pipe found onsite should be properly removed by a licensed asbestos‐removal contractor.
 There is the potential that building areas may contain abandoned underground storage tanks and or septic systems.  A geophysical survey for these features is warranted and, if found, appropriate soil sampling for the potential presence of contaminants where appropriate is warranted due to agricultural usage of portions of the site.  Since prior soil sampling and testing for pesticides was limited to locations of irrigation laterals onsite,soilsampling and analysisis warranted for former building and agricultural areas of the site.
 An inspection of known wells onsite is warranted.   Wells that are planned for abandonment or were improperly abandoned should be abandoned according to all applicable state and/or county ordinances and regulations.  There is the potential for the presence of lead residue in the soil around buildings from lead‐based paint.  Soil sampling with analysis is warranted.  There is the potential for the presence of heavy metals in the soil relative to the trap and skeet buildings.  If this is a concern, soil sampling with analysis could be conducted. ‐o0o‐
August 3, 2018  ‐ 20 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

REFERENCES
Brickley Environmental, 1998, Tom Brickley, personal interview, February 24, 1998.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/WellFinder.aspx, website accessed July 14, 2018.

California Department of Food and Agriculture, 1985, Agricultural Sources of DDT Residues in California’s Environment, dated September 1985.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor website, http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/default.asp, accessed July 20, 2018.

California Department of Water Resources [DWR], 1964, Bulletin Number 108 – Coachella Valley Investigation, July 1964.

California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board, https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/, website accessed July 20, 2018.

City of La Quinta, City Clerk, Request for Public Records, July 20, 2018. _____, Department of Design and Development, Planning Division, City of La Quinta, Official Zoning Map, dated July 2016.

Coachella Valley Grading, 1999, Bob Sheppard, personal interview, August 1999.

Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD], Saul Montalvo, Engineering Aide II, email communication, July 17, 2018.

Earth Systems Pacific, aerial photograph archives, as listed below:

Date Source/Flight Frame Approximate Scale
01‐17‐1956 Fairchild, C‐22386       1:106          1:2000‐ 04‐11‐73 RCFCD 12        ‐ ‐
6‐20‐1974 RCFCD 780 1:2112‐
5‐26‐1980 RCFCD   808  ‐ ‐
Earth Systems Southwest (prior entity of Earth Systems Pacific), 2006a, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Irrigation Laterals Within West Andalusia Development West of Madison Street Between Avenues 58 and 60 La Quinta, California, File No.: 09305‐ 06, Doc. No.: 06‐06‐700, dated June 1, 2006.
_______, 2006b, Supplemental Pesticide Sampling West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals West of Madison Street between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, California. File No.: 09305‐06, Doc. No.: 06‐07‐705, dated July 6, 2006.
_______, 2007, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling, West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals, West of Madison Street between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California File No.: 09305‐08, Doc. No.: 07‐01‐752, dated January 12, 2007.

August 3, 2018  ‐ 21 ‐  File No.: 300300‐005
Doc. No.: 18‐08‐702

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
ERIS, Database Report, 377.206 Acres W. of Madison Street, La Quinta CA, Project No.: 300300‐ 005, Order No.: 20180717212, dated July 19, 2018.

Google Earth, aerial photograph archives, as listed below:

Date Source/Flight
9‐25‐1996 USGS
5‐8‐2002 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe
11‐16 ‐2004 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe
5‐24‐2009 USDA Farm Service Agency
4‐11‐2014 USDA Farm Service Agency
2‐17‐2018 Landsat/Copernicus; 2018 DigitalGlobe
Riverside County Agricultural Commission, 1997, Carolyn Brown, personal communication, July 17, 1997.

Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, 2007, Paul Mitchell, personal communication, August 2007.

Riverside County Information Technology, Riverside County Geographic Information Services, http://mmc.rivcoit.org/MMC_Public/Custom/disclaimer/Default.htm, website accessed July 18, 2018.

Saltzman, Sarina, and Bruno Yaron, editors, 1986, Pesticides in Soil, published by Van Nostrand Reinhold Soil Sciences Series, New York.

T D Desert Development, Nolan Sparks, Vice President, email contact July 21, 2018.

Thomson, W. T., 1998. Agricultural Chemicals: Book I – Insecticides, 14th Edition.   Thomson Publications, Fresno, California.

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972. _____.  La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo‐revised 1980. _____.  Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo‐revised 1988. _____.  Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.

US Department of Environmental Protection, 2000, Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals Table 2000.
_____, 2013, 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, Final Rule, dated November 13, 2013.

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix A
Figures
Scale: 1" = 2,000’
0 2,000’ 4,000’
Figure 1
Site Location
Approximate Site Boundary
Base Map: USGS 7-1/2' Quadrangle, Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972; La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photorevised 1980; Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo-revised 1988; Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972.

File No.: 300300-005
SITE
Earth Systems
8/3/2018
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

LEGEND
LEGEND
Figure 2
Site Layout
Approximate Site Boundary
Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

Earth Systems
8/3/2018
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

File No.: 300300-005
Madison Street
Avenue 58
Avenue 60
Residential
Andalusia
Country
Club
Levee
Rindlesbach
Construction
Residential
Trilogy at La Quinta
Country Club
Home 1
Home 2
Home 3 (Old Ranch)
Well 1
Well 2
Well 3
Well 4
Well 5
Former Farmland
Concrete Slab
Approximate Areas of Concentrated Debris
Approximate Well Locations
Approximate Scale: 1" = 875’
0 875’ 1,750’
Approximate Home Locations
Residential
Former Location of Madison Street
Home 4
Home 5

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix B
Photographs
Storm Drain Inlet
Site Photographs

Photo 1: View south from north central part of site.

Photo 3: Former farm land in central part of site.

Photo 5: Debris at House 1 area. Photo 6: Asbestos cement pipe on west side of site.

Photo 4: Debris at House 2 area.

Photo 2: View north of east side of site on old Madison Street.
8/3/2018
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

File No. 300300-005

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix C
Agency Database Search Report
Project Property: 377.206 Acres W. of Madison
n/a
La Quinta CA
Project No: 300300-005
Report Type: Database Report
Order No: 20180717212
Requested by: Earth Systems Pacific
Date Completed: July 19, 2018
2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Table of Contents
Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY
Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records.

License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier.

The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold.

Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service.

No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.

Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS.

Table of Contents
Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................8 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................9 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................10 Map...............................................................................................................12 Aerial.............................................................................................................15 Topographic Map..........................................................................................16 Detail Report.................................................................................................17 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................26 Unplottable Report........................................................................................27 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................32 Definitions.....................................................................................................43 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary
Property Information:

Project Property: 377.206 Acres W. of Madison
n/a La Quinta CA
Project No: 300300-005
Coordinates:

Latitude: 33.619942
Longitude: -116.255164
UTM Northing: 3,720,265.86
UTM Easting: 569,089.53
UTM Zone: UTM Zone 11S
Elevation: -33 FT
Order Information:

Order No: 20180717212
Date Requested: July 17, 2018
Requested by: Earth Systems Pacific
Report Type: Database Report
Historicals/Products:

Executive Summary
4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary
Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi
.125mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
Standard Environmental Records
Federal
rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-SEMS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-ODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-CERCLIS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-IODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-RCRA CESQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-FED ENG-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-FED INST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-FEMA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
State
rr-RESPONSE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
NPL

PROPOSED NPL

DELETED NPL
SEMS
ODI

SEMS ARCHIVE

CERCLIS
IODI

CERCLIS NFRAP

CERCLIS LIENS

RCRA CORRACTS

RCRA TSD

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG

RCRA CESQG

RCRA NON GEN

FED ENG

FED INST
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

FEMA UST

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD

RESPONSE
Executive Summary: Report Summary
5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi
.125mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-ENVIROSTOR-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-DELISTED ENVS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-HWP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-LDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-SWAT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1
rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-SWRCB SWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-UST CLOSURE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-HHSS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-DELISTED TNK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-CERS TANK-aa Y .25 0 1 0 - - 1
rr-LUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-HLUR-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DEED-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-VCP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-CLEANUP SITES-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DELISTED CTNK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-HIST TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
Tribal
rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
County
rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-KERN AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1
rr-UST RIVERSIDE-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-SUNNYVALE CUPA-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
Additional Environmental Records
Federal
rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 1 - - - 1
rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-HMIRS-aa Y .125 0 0 - - - 0
rr-NCDL-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF
HWP
LDS
SWAT
LUST

DELISTED LST
UST

SWRCB SWF

UST CLOSURE
HHSS
AST

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK
LUR
HLUR
DEED
VCP

CLEANUP SITES

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED ILST

DELISTED IUST

DELISTED COUNTY

KERN AST

RIVERSIDE LOP

UST RIVERSIDE

SUNNYVALE CUPA

FINDS/FRS
TRIS
HMIRS
NCDL
6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi
.125mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 - - - 0
rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 - - - 0
rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-MINES-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-SSTS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-PCB-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
State
rr-INSP COMP ENF-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-CDL-aa Y .125 0 0 - - - 0
rr-SCH-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr-CHMIRS-aa Y PO 1 - - - - 1
rr-HAZNET-aa Y PO 1 1 - - - 2
rr-HWSS CLEANUP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DTSC HWF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-HIST MANIFEST-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-HIST CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0
rr-HIST CORTESE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-CDO/CAO-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DELISTED HAZ-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0
rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-DELISTED DRYC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-WASTE DISCHG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-EMISSIONS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0
rr-CERS HAZ-aa Y .125 0 0 - - - 0
Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-aa Y .125 0 1 - - - 1
rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-aa Y .125 0 1 - - - 1
TSCA

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
FUDS
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES

ALT FUELS
SSTS
PCB

INSP COMP ENF
CDL
SCH
CHMIRS
HAZNET

HWSS CLEANUP

DTSC HWF

HIST MANIFEST

HIST CHMIRS

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

DELISTED HAZ

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYC

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS

CERS HAZ

RIVERSIDE HWG

RIVERSIDE HZH
7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi
.125mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
Total: 2 5 2 0 0 9
* PO – Property Only
* 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m1d dd-CHMIRS-821802190-aa Riverside Co Fire Behind 58500 Madison Av.

La Quinta CA
- 0.00 / 0.00 -16 p1p-17-821802190-x1x
m2d dd-HAZNET-826593254-aa RINDLESBACH

CONSTRUCTION
59781 MADISON ST
LA QUINTA CA 922537656
- 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-17-826593254-x1x
17 17
1 2
CHMIRS
HAZNET
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m3d dd-CERS TANK-864890975-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 AVENUE 60 LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-18-864890975-x1x
m3d dd-FINDS/FRS-840042193-aa ANDALUSIA COUNTRY
CLUB
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-22-840042193-x1x
m3d dd-RIVERSIDE HWG-820094002-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-820094002-x1x
m3d dd-RIVERSIDE HZH-820089232-aa Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60 La Quinta CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-820089232-x1x
m3d dd-HAZNET-826784462-aa CORAL OPTION I LLC

DBA ANADALUSIA

COUNTRY CLUB
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 0 p1p-23-826784462-x1x
m4d dd-RIVERSIDE LOP-820083889-aa KSL PGA West
Weiskoff/Nicklaus Private
80202 Ave 58
La Quinta CA
NW 0.21 /
1,126.93
19 p1p-24-820083889-x1x
Site ID | Status Desc: 9914972 | CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED m4d dd-LUST-820194235-aa KSL PGA WEST

WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS
80202 AVENUE 58
LA QUINTA CA 92253
NW 0.21 /
1,126.93
19 p1p-24-820194235-x1x
Global ID | Status | Status Date: T0606500977 | Completed - Case Closed | 1999-10-29 00:00:00 18 22
23 23
23 24
24 3
3 3
3 3
4 4
CERS
TANK

FINDS/FRS

RIVERSIDE
HWG

RIVERSIDE
HZH
HAZNET

RIVERSIDE
LOP
LUST
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source
Standard
State
LUST - Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports
A search of the LUST database, dated Apr 3, 2018 has found that there are 1 LUST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key

KSL PGA WEST

WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS
80202 AVENUE 58
LA QUINTA CA 92253
NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 m-4-820194235-a
Global ID | Status | Status Date: T0606500977 | Completed - Case Closed | 1999-10-29 00:00:00 CERS TANK - California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks A search of the CERS TANK database, dated Mar 22, 2018 has found that there are 1 CERS TANK site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-864890975-a

County
RIVERSIDE LOP - Riverside County Local Oversight Program List A search of the RIVERSIDE LOP database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE LOP site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key KSL PGA West Weiskoff/Nicklaus
Private
80202 Ave 58
La Quinta CA
NW 0.21 / 1,126.93 m-4-820083889-a
Site ID | Status Desc: 9914972 | CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED Non Standard
Federal
FINDS/FRS - Facility Registry Service/Facility Index
A search of the FINDS/FRS database, dated Apr 17, 2018 has found that there are 1 FINDS/FRS site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-840042193-a
4 3
4 3
Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source
11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key

State
CHMIRS - California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) A search of the CHMIRS database, dated Jun 19, 2018 has found that there are 1 CHMIRS site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Riverside Co Fire Behind 58500 Madison Av.

La Quinta CA
- 0.00 / 0.00 m-1-821802190-a

HAZNET - Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
A search of the HAZNET database, dated Oct 24, 2016 has found that there are 2 HAZNET site(s) within approximately 0.02 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION 59781 MADISON ST
LA QUINTA CA 922537656
- 0.00 / 0.00 m-2-826593254-a

CORAL OPTION I LLC DBA

ANADALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-826784462-a

County
RIVERSIDE HWG - Riverside County Hazardous Waste Generator Sites List A search of the RIVERSIDE HWG database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE HWG site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60
La Quinta CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-820094002-a

RIVERSIDE HZH - Riverside County Disclosure Facility List A search of the RIVERSIDE HZH database, dated Feb 15, 2018 has found that there are 1 RIVERSIDE HZH site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Andalusia Country Club 81120 Avenue 60
La Quinta CA 92253
SSE 0.01 / 63.73 m-3-820089232-a

1 2
3 3
3 #*
#*
#*
#*
m2c
m1c
m4c(2)
m3c(5)
Lake
Cahuilla
116°17'W 116°16'30"W 116°16'W 116°15'30"W 116°15'W 116°14'30"W 116°14'W 33°38'30"N
33°38'30"N
33°38'N
33°38'N
33°37'30"N
33°37'30"N
33°37'N
33°37'N
33°36'30"N
33°36'30"N
33°36'N
33°36'N

0.4 0.2 0 0.4
Miles
Order No: 20180717212
Map : 1 Mile Radius
1:26700
Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA
Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc.

Project Property
Buffer Outline
#* Eris Sites with Higher Elevation
") Eris Sites with Same Elevation
#* Eris Sites with Lower Elevation
( Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation
County Boundary
Rails
Major Highways
Major Highways Ramps
Major Roads
Major Roads Ramps
Secondary Roads
Secondary Roads Ramps
Local Roads and Ramps
State Boundary
National Priority List Sites
National Wetland
Indian Reserve Land
Historic Fill
100 Year Flood Zone
500 Year Flood Zone
FWS Special Designation Areas
State Brownfield Sites
State Brownfield Areas
State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense
State Superfund Areas:NPL
WQARF Areas
Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense
(owned/administered areas)
2 1
4 (2)
3 (5)
#*
#*
#*
#*
m2c
m1c
m4c(2)
m3c(5)
Lake
Cahuilla
116°16'W 116°15'30"W 116°15'W 116°14'30"W
33°38'N
33°38'N
33°37'30"N
33°37'30"N
33°37'N
33°37'N
33°36'30"N
33°36'30"N

0.25 0.125 0 0.25
Miles
Order No: 20180717212
Map : 0.5 Mile Radius
1:17800
Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA
Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc.

Project Property
Buffer Outline
#* Eris Sites with Higher Elevation
") Eris Sites with Same Elevation
#* Eris Sites with Lower Elevation
( Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation
County Boundary
Rails
Major Highways
Major Highways Ramps
Major Roads
Major Roads Ramps
Secondary Roads
Secondary Roads Ramps
Local Roads and Ramps
State Boundary
National Priority List Sites
National Wetland
Indian Reserve Land
Historic Fill
100 Year Flood Zone
500 Year Flood Zone
FWS Special Designation Areas
State Brownfield Sites
State Brownfield Areas
State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense
State Superfund Areas:NPL
WQARF Areas
Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense
(owned/administered areas)
2 1
4 (2)
3 (5)
#*
#*
#*
#*
m2c
m1c
m4c(2)
m3c(5)
Lake Cahuilla
Madison St
58th Ave
Hermitage
Avenue 60
Aracena
60th Ave
Andalusia
M arbel l a
Interlachen
C h antic leer Dr
Quarry Ln
Se minole Dr
Calle Azul
Black Diamond
Calle Conchita
Barristo Cir
S
Val ley Ln
Salida Del Sol
Barrel Cactus Rd
Santa Rosa Trl
Red Rock Rd
Santo Thomas
Desert Rose Dr
Mijas
Archine Ln
Coral Mo untain Ct
Aloe Cir
Riviera
Angora Ct
Stone Creek
Trl W
Old R a n ch Trl S
Cherrywood Pl
Madison St
60th Ave
Madison St
60th Ave
58th Ave
116°16'W 116°15'30"W 116°15'W 116°14'30"W
33°37'30"N
33°37'30"N
33°37'N
33°37'N
33°36'30"N
33°36'30"N

0.2 0.1 0 0.2
Miles
Order No: 20180717212
Map : 0.25 Mile Radius
1:13400
Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA
Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc.

Project Property
Buffer Outline
#* Eris Sites with Higher Elevation
") Eris Sites with Same Elevation
#* Eris Sites with Lower Elevation
( Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation
County Boundary
Rails
Major Highways
Major Highways Ramps
Major Roads
Major Roads Ramps
Secondary Roads
Secondary Roads Ramps
Local Roads and Ramps
State Boundary
National Priority List Sites
National Wetland
Indian Reserve Land
Historic Fill
100 Year Flood Zone
500 Year Flood Zone
FWS Special Designation Areas
State Brownfield Sites
State Brownfield Areas
State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense
State Superfund Areas:NPL
WQARF Areas
Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense
(owned/administered areas)
2 1
4 (2)
3 (5)
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 116°15'30"W 116°15'W
33°37'30"N
33°37'30"N
33°37'N
33°37'N

0.1 0.05 0 0.1
Miles
Order No: 20180717212 Aerial
1:8900
Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA
© ERIS Information Inc. Source: ESRI World Imagery
(2017)
116°16'30"W 116°16'W 116°15'30"W 116°15'W 116°14'30"W 116°14'W 33°38'30"N
33°38'30"N
33°38'N
33°38'N
33°37'30"N
33°37'30"N
33°37'N
33°37'N
33°36'30"N
33°36'30"N
33°36'N
33°36'N

0.35 0.175 0 0.35
Miles
Topog Order No: 20180717212 raphic Map
1:24000
Address: n/a, La Quinta, CA
© ERIS Information Inc.

Source: USGS Topographic Map
(2015)
Quadrangle(s): Valerie, CA; Martinez Mountain, CA; La Quinta, CA; Indio, CA; 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Detail Report
Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
m-1-821802190-b 1 of 1 - 0.00 /

0.00 -49.28 /
-16
Riverside Co Fire
Behind 58500 Madison Av.

La Quinta CA
dd-CHMIRS-821802190-bb
p1p-821802190-y1y
ID: 02-5704 Notified Date: 10/21/200202:03:50 PM
Control No: 02-5704 Notified Date Time:

Year: 2002 County: Riverside County
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
Contained: Yes Bbls: 0
Substance: Drug Lab Waste Cups: 0
Incident Date: 10/15/200212:00:00 AM Cuft: 0
No of Injuries: 0 Gals: 0.000000
No of Fatals: 0 Grams: 0
No of Evacs: 0 Lbs: 0
Cleanup: Contractor Liters: 0
Water: No Oz: 0
Water Way: Pts: 0
City: La Quinta Qts: 0
County: Riverside County Sheen: 0
Zip: Tons: 0
Site: Road Unknown: 0
Admin Agency: Riverside County Environmental Health
Location: Behind 58500 Madison Av.

Description: Per caller, a construction site unearthed a large dumping area of drug lab waste. m-2-826593254-b 1 of 1 - 0.00 /

0.00 -40.13 /
-7

RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION
59781 MADISON ST
LA QUINTA CA 922537656
dd-HAZNET-826593254-bb
p1p-826593254-y1y
SIC Code: Mailing City: LA QUINTA
NAICS Code: Mailing State: CA
EPA ID: CAC002596470 Mailing Zip: 922537656
Create Date: 10/13/2005 Region Code: 4
Fac Act Ind: No Owner Name: RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION
Inact Date: 4/12/2006 Owner Addr 1: 59781 MADISON ST
County Code: 33 Owner Addr 2:

County Name: Riverside Owner City: LA QUINTA
Mail Name: Owner State: CA
Mailing Addr 1: 59781 MADISON ST Owner Zip: 922537656
Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 7603997263
Owner Fax:

Contact Information
-- --
Contact Name: BLAKE JUMPER
Street Address 1: 59781 MADISON ST
Street Address 2:

City: LA QUINTA
State: CA
Zip: 922537656
Phone: 7603997263
-- --
-- --
Tanner Information
-- --
1 2
CHMIRS
HAZNET
Detail Report
18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Generator EPA ID: CAC002596470
Generator County Code: 33
Generator County: Riverside
TSD EPA ID: AZC950823111
TSD County Code: 99
TSD County: Unknown
State Waste Code: 151
State Waste Code Desc.: Asbestos containing waste
Method Code:

Method Description:

Tons: 0.16856
Year: 2005
-- --
m-3-864890975-b 1 of 5 SSE 0.01 /

63.73 -33.40 /
0 Andalusia Country Club
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
dd-CERS TANK-864890975-bb
p1p-864890975-y1y
Site ID: 92248
Latitude: 33.612785
Longitude: -116.253005
Regulated Programs
EI ID: 10324504
EI Description: Hazardous Waste Generator
EI ID: 10324504
EI Description: Chemical Storage Facilities
EI ID: 10324504
EI Description: Aboveground Petroleum Storage
Affiliations
Affil Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: Andalusia Country Club
Entity Title:

Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone:

Affil Type Desc: Primary Emergency Contact
Entity Name: William Carrick
Entity Title: Golf Course Supnt.

Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone: (760) 275-7990
Affil Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: William Carrick
Entity Title:

Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone:

Affil Type Desc: Secondary Emergency Contact
3 CERS TANK
19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Entity Name: Jerry Hernandez
Entity Title: Assistant Supnt.

Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone: (760) 469-6381
Affil Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: William Carrick
Entity Title: Golf Course Superintendent
Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone:

Affil Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: William Carrick
Entity Title:

Address:

City:

State:

Country:

Zip Code:

Phone: (760) 275-7990
Affil Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: William Carrick
Entity Title:

Address: 81-120 Avenue 60
City: La Quinta
State: CA
Country:

Zip Code: 92253
Phone: (760) 771-9160
Affil Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title:

Address: 81120 Avenue 60
City: La Quinta
State: CA
Country:

Zip Code: 92253
Phone:

Affil Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: Drummond Corp/William Carrick
Entity Title:

Address: 81120 60th Ave
City: La Quinta
State: CA
Country: United States
Zip Code: 92253
Phone: (800) 289-2625
Affil Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Riverside Cnty Env Health
Entity Title:

Address: 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104
City: Riverside
State: CA
Country:

Zip Code: 92503
Phone: (951) 358-5055
20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Coordinates
Env Int Type Code: HWG Longitude: -116.253000
Program ID: 10324504 Coord Name:

Latitude: 33.612780 Ref Point Type Desc: Center of a facility or station.

Evaluations
Eval Date: 04-07-2016
Violations Found: No
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: APSA
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Eval Date: 11-04-2013
Violations Found: No
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Reinspection
Eval Date: 04-07-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Eval Date: 04-07-2016
Violations Found: No
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Eval Date: 09-12-2013
Violations Found: Yes
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Routine inspection
Eval Date: 09-12-2013
Violations Found: Yes
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Eval Program: HMRRP
21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Eval Source: CERS
Eval Notes:

Routine inspection
Violations
Violation Date: 09-12-2013 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 105D] Hazardous materials containers have been labeled properly.

Violation Description:

Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations
Violation Date: 04-07-2016 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 04/26/2016. Owner/operator failed to post NFPA-704 signs. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner operator shall research the safety data sheets for chemicals stored onsite and post the appropriate NFPA-704 signs where hazardous materials are stored and at all entrances to the facility.

Violation Description:

Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violations
Violation Date: 09-12-2013 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 104A] NFPA 704 sign(s) have been posted appropriately.

Violation Description:

Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violations
Violation Date: 09-12-2013 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.5 25250.7 - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) 25250.7 Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 09/12/2013.

Violation Description:

Failure to handle contaminated used oil (other than minimal amounts of vehicle fuel) as a hazardous waste.

Violations
22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Violation Date: 04-07-2016 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 04/26/2016. Owner/operator failed to clearly identify emergency equipment storage locations. CORRECTIVE ACTION:

Clearly identify the locations where emergency equipment is stored.

Violation Description:

Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations
Violation Date: 09-12-2013 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 11/04/2013. [LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION 104C] Hazardous materials storage area(s) have been posted appropriately.

Violation Description:

Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General Violations
Violation Date: 09-12-2013 Violation Program:

Violation Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Violation Source:

Citation: 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) Violation Notes:

Returned to compliance on 09/12/2013.

Violation Description:

Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", name and address of the generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation date.

Enforcements
Enf Action Date: 09-12-2013 Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program) Enf Action Source: CERS Enf Action Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes:

Enf Action Date: 09-12-2013 Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program) Enf Action Source: CERS Enf Action Division: Riverside County Department of Env Health Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes:
m-3-840042193-b 2 of 5 SSE 0.01 /

63.73 -33.40 /
0 ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
dd-FINDS/FRS-840042193-bb
p1p-840042193-y1y
Registry ID: 110066151354
FIPS Code:

Program Acronyms: CA-ENVIROVIEW
3 FINDS/FRS
23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
HUC Code: 18100200
Site Type Name: STATIONARY
Location Description:

Supplemental Location:

Create Date: 14-OCT-2015 10:09:12
Update Date:

Interest Types: STATE MASTER
SIC Codes:

SIC Code Descriptions:

NAICS Codes:

NAICS Code Descriptions:

Conveyor: FRS-GEOCODE
Federal Facility Code:

Federal Agency Name:

Tribal Land Code:

Tribal Land Name:

Congressional Dist No.: 45
Census Block Code: 060650456054023
EPA Region Code: 09
County Name: RIVERSIDE
US/Mexico Border Ind:

Latitude: 33.61274
Longitude: -116.252905
Reference Point: ENTRANCE POINT OF A FACILITY OR STATION Coord Collection Method: ADDRESS MATCHING-HOUSE NUMBER
Accuracy Value: 50
Datum: NAD83
Source:

Facility Detail Rprt URL: http://ofmpub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110066151354 m-3-820094002-b 3 of 5 SSE 0.01 /

63.73 -33.40 /
0 Andalusia Country Club
81120 Avenue 60
La Quinta CA 92253
dd-RIVERSIDE HWG-820094002-bb
p1p-820094002-y1y
m-3-820089232-b 4 of 5 SSE 0.01 /

63.73 -33.40 /
0 Andalusia Country Club
81120 Avenue 60
La Quinta CA 92253
dd-RIVERSIDE HZH-820089232-bb
p1p-820089232-y1y
m-3-826784462-b 5 of 5 SSE 0.01 /

63.73 -33.40 /
0 CORAL OPTION I LLC DBA

ANADALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB
81120 AVENUE 60
LA QUINTA CA 92253
dd-HAZNET-826784462-bb
p1p-826784462-y1y
SIC Code: 3429,3519,3599,3714,3799 Mailing City: LA QUINTA NAICS Code: 336399 Mailing State: CA
EPA ID: CAL000313822 Mailing Zip: 922530000
Create Date: 11/28/2006 Region Code: 4
Fac Act Ind: Yes Owner Name: DRUMMOND CO INC
Inact Date: Owner Addr 1: PO BOX 10246
County Code: 33 Owner Addr 2:

County Name: Riverside Owner City: BIRMINGHAM
Mail Name: Owner State: AL
Mailing Addr 1: 81120 AVE 60 Owner Zip: 352020246
Mailing Addr 2: Owner Phone: 8002892625
Owner Fax: 2059456557
Contact Information
-- --
Contact Name: WILLIAM CARRICK GOLF SUPT
Street Address 1: 81-570 CARBONERAS
Street Address 2:
3 3
3 RIVERSIDE
HWG

RIVERSIDE
HZH
HAZNET
24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
City: LA QUINTA
State: CA
Zip: 92253
Phone: 7607719160
-- --
m-4-820083889-b 1 of 2 NW 0.21 /
1,126.93
-14.76 /
19 KSL PGA West Weiskoff/Nicklaus
Private
80202 Ave 58
La Quinta CA
dd-RIVERSIDE LOP-820083889-bb
p1p-820083889-y1y
Site ID: 9914972 Closed Code: Y
Status Code: 9 Closed Desc: CLOSED SITE
Status Desc: CLOSED/ACTION COMPLETED Employee: Shurlow-LOP Case Type Code: S
Case Type Desc: SOIL ONLY IS IMPACTED
m-4-820194235-b 2 of 2 NW 0.21 /
1,126.93
-14.76 /
19 KSL PGA WEST

WEISKOFF/NICKLAUS
80202 AVENUE 58
LA QUINTA CA 92253
dd-LUST-820194235-bb
p1p-820194235-y1y
Global ID: T0606500977 CUF Case: NO
Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site Begin Date: 1998-11-23 00:00:00 Status: Completed - Case Closed How Discovered: Other Means Status Date: 1999-10-29 00:00:00 Stop Method: Close and Remove Tank RB Case No: 7T2253011 County: Riverside
LOC Case No: 9914972 Latitude: 33.6281886772241
Lead Agency: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP Longitude: -116.264376180391 Case Worker: RIV File Location: Local Agency Warehouse
Local Agency: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP
Potential Media Of Concern: Gasoline
Potential Media Affected: Soil
How Discovered Description:

Stop Description:

Cal Water Watershed Name: Whitewater - Coachella - Indio (719.47) DWR Groundwater Subbasin
Name:

Coachella Valley - Indio (7-21.01)
Site History:

Status History
Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 1998-11-23 00:00:00 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 1999-10-29 00:00:00 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 1999-03-02 00:00:00 Activities
Action Type: Other
Action: Leak Stopped
Date: 1998-11-23 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #RCDEH1029
Date: 1999-10-29 00:00:00
Action Type: Other
Action: Leak Reported
Date: 1999-03-02 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
4 4

RIVERSIDE
LOP
LUST
25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action: File review - #RCDEH Upload Site File 8/26/2015 Date: 1999-10-28 00:00:00
Action Type: Other
Action: Leak Discovery
Date: 1999-03-02 00:00:00
Contacts
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker City: PALM DESERT Contact Name: Phan Le Email: [email protected] Organization Name: COLORADO RIVER BASIN RWQCB
(REGION 7)
Phone No: 7607768974
Address: 73720 FRED WARING DRIVE SUITE #100
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker City: RIVERSIDE
Contact Name: Riverside County LOP Email:

Organization Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOP Phone No: 9519558980 Address: 3880 LEMON ST SUITE 200
26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Unplottable Summary
Total: 11 Unplottable sites
DB Company Name/Site
Name
Address City Zip ERIS ID
uu-CDL-820128393-aa 62ND AVE (DIRT ROAD) THERMAL CA 92274 820128393 uu-CDL-820127712-aa FOUND @ FREDA & MADISON

STREETS
RIVERSIDE CA 92503 820127712
uu-CLEANUP SITES-820165142-aa BRINE FAC, LAYTON
POND
Madison Street and Lenox Ave RIVERSIDE CA 92504 820165142 uu-EMISSIONS-861245679-aa COACHELLA VALLEY

WATER DIST
AVENUE 38 E MADISON INDIO CA 92236 861245679
uu-HHSS-822935508-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN
THERMAL CA 92274 822935508
uu-HHSS-822949830-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN
THERMAL CA 92274 822949830
uu-HIST TANK-865061935-aa PETER RABBIT FARMS AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN
THERMAL CA 865061935
uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084974-aa CVWD Well Site #6729-1 Madison at Taylor Country St La Quinta CA 92253 820084974 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820086422-aa Ave #42 Substation Ave 42 w/o Madison St Indio CA 92201 820086422 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084689-aa CVWD Booster Station
#06730
Ave 58 & QuarryLn La Quinta CA 92253 820084689
uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084671-aa Avenue #58 Substation Ave 58 1/4 mi w/o La Quinta CA 92253 820084671 CDL
CDL

CLEANUP SITES

EMISSIONS
HHSS
HHSS

HIST TANK

RIVERSIDE HZH

RIVERSIDE HZH

RIVERSIDE HZH

RIVERSIDE HZH
Unplottable Summary
27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Unplottable Report
Site:
62ND AVE (DIRT ROAD) THERMAL CA 92274 uu-CDL-820128393-bb Clue: 1997-02-150
Date: 2/27/1997
County: RIVERSIDE
Lab Type: A
Lab Type Description: Abandoned Drug Lab Waste - location away from an actual illegal drug lab where drug lab waste and/or equipment were abandoned.

Site:

FOUND @ FREDA & MADISON STREETS RIVERSIDE CA 92503 uu-CDL-820127712-bb Clue: 1998-12-036
Date: 12/8/1998
County: RIVERSIDE
Lab Type: M
Lab Type Description: Mobile Lab - location where illegal drug lab equipment and materials were found in a vehicle or other mode of transport.

Site: BRINE FAC, LAYTON POND
Madison Street and Lenox Ave RIVERSIDE CA 92504 uu-CLEANUP SITES-820165142-bb Global ID: L10008444825 CUF Case: NO
Case Type: Land Disposal Site Begin Date:

Status: Open - Inactive How Discovered:

Status Date: 2014-11-04 00:00:00 Stop Method:

RB Case No: 8 330117001 County: Riverside
LOC Case No: Latitude: 33.9212748561894
Lead Agency: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Longitude: -117.391480207443 Case Worker: KDP File Location: Regional Board
Local Agency:

Potential Cntm of Concrn:

Potential Media Affected:

How Discovered Description:

Stop Description:

Cal Water Watershed Name: Santa Ana River - Middle Santa Ana River - Arlington (801.26) DWR Groundwater Subbasin
Name:

Upper Santa Ana Valley - Riverside-Arlington (8-2.03)
Site History:

Layton Brine Pond Site Summary - It is a brine disposal pond located about half a mile southeast of the Victoria Ave. and Madison St. intersection in Riverside and is located within the Arlington Groundwater Basin -The pond is rectangular and measures approximately 250 feet by 150 feet - Layton Soft Water, Inc leases the property from Union Pacific, and disposed of the brine that was a by-product of operations -Brine consisted primarily of sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) -Disposal of brine has ceased since June 1, 1989 -The geological setting of the site is characterized as silty and coarse sand alluvium, overlaying granite bedrock -Since the site located in an abandoned granite quarry, the RWQCB has found that the brine pond is impermeable and has no signs of leakage or that groundwater is being impacted -Cornerstone completed a Groundwater Monitoring Investigation in early 2009 that concurs with the findings made by the RWQCB -According to RWQCB Order No. 81-74, the pond was found to be impermeable and bi-annual monitoring was to be implemented -March 8, 1990, RWQCB wrote a letter stating that if site remained closed, there would be no objection to letting the remaining brine solution evaporate -due to seasonal rain fall, this has not proven very effective Closure Plan -Move surrounding soil (previously from the rock quarry), back into the brine pond -Cover the existing liquid in the pond with 2 to 3 feet of dirt, allowing adsorption -Following a period for adsorption to take place, more soil will be move to the pond, increasing the coverage level to 4 to 5 feet, allowing natural vegetation -Closure Work Plan submitted back in 2009 mention the soil would be compacted to 90% relative compaction. No mention of compaction was made in the latest submittal. Clarification is needed -In the event that there is not enough soil in the surrounding area, soil approved by the RWQCB will be brought in Contingencies -Closure is dependent on approval of: -Action plan by the RWQCB -Permit from City of Riverside and complete release of liability with the closing of the conditional use permit under which Layton has operated under -Termination of lease with Southern Pacific Railroad and release of liability for any and all circumstances regarding any relationship with them   CDL
CDL

CLEANUP SITES
Unplottable Report
28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Status History
Status: Open - Inactive Status Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00 Status: Open - Inactive Status Date: 2014-11-04 00:00:00 Activities
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Monitoring Report - Other
Date: 1990-01-25 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
Date: 2017-11-22 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Monitoring Report - Other
Date: 2017-12-14 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
Date: 2017-03-13 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date: 2017-03-14 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Correspondence
Date: 2010-09-03 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Waste Discharge Requirements
Date: 1981-04-10 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Other Report / Document
Date: 2015-12-15 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Closure Plan
Date: 2009-05-11 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date: 2017-03-20 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Closure Plan
Date: 2014-06-05 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Other Report / Document
Date: 2016-12-05 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Monitoring Report - Other
Date: 2017-06-15 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Monitoring Report - Other
Date: 2003-02-06 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #81-74 Date: 2017-03-15 00:00:00
29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Staff Letter
Date: 2010-10-12 00:00:00
Action Type: RESPONSE
Action: Correspondence
Date: 2015-12-14 00:00:00
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Action: Staff Letter
Date: 2014-06-25 00:00:00
Contacts
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker City: RIVERSIDE Contact Name: KEITH PERSON Email: [email protected] Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Phone No:

Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500
Site: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST
AVENUE 38 E MADISON INDIO CA 92236 uu-EMISSIONS-861245679-bb 1996 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC
TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:
1997 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC
TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:
1998 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC
TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:
1999 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC

EMISSIONS
30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:
2000 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC
TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:
2001 Toxic Data
Facility ID: 17818 COID: RIV
Facility SIC Code: 4952 DISN: SOUTH COAST AQMD
CO: 33 CHAPIS:

Air Basin: SS CERR Code:

District: SC
TS:

Health Risk Asmt:

Non-Cancer Chronic Haz Ind:

Non-Cancer Acute Haz Ind:

Site: PETER RABBIT FARMS
AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 uu-HHSS-822935508-bb County: Imperial
Pdf File Url: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001f49d.pdf Site: PETER RABBIT FARMS
AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA 92274 uu-HHSS-822949830-bb County: Riverside
Pdf File Url: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001f49d.pdf Site: PETER RABBIT FARMS
AVE 58 BETWEEN HWY 86 AND VAN THERMAL CA uu-HIST TANK-865061935-bb Owner Name: CARDINAL DISTRIBUTING CO No of Containers: 1 Owner Street: 85-810 GRAPEFRUIT BLVD. County: RIVERSIDE Owner City: COACHELLA Facility State: CA
Owner State: CA Facility Zip: 92274
Owner Zip: 92236
Site: CVWD Well Site #6729-1
Madison at Taylor Country St La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084974-bb Site: Ave #42 Substation
Ave 42 w/o Madison St Indio CA 92201 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820086422-bb Site: CVWD Booster Station #06730
HHSS
HHSS

HIST TANK

RIVERSIDE HZH

RIVERSIDE HZH
31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Ave 58 & QuarryLn La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084689-bb Site: Avenue #58 Substation
Ave 58 1/4 mi w/o La Quinta CA 92253 uu-RIVERSIDE HZH-820084671-bb

RIVERSIDE HZH

RIVERSIDE HZH
32 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions
Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information:
"Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources
Federal
National Priority List: rr-NPL-bb
National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action.

Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018
National Priority List - Proposed: rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb
Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment.

Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018
Deleted NPL: rr-DELETED NPL-bb
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.

In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.

Government Publication Date: Feb 6, 2018
SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: rr-SEMS-bb
The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted.

Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018
Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: rr-ODI-bb
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257).

Government Publication Date: Jun 1985
SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb
The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time.

Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018
NPL

PROPOSED NPL

DELETED NPL
SEMS
ODI

SEMS ARCHIVE
Appendix: Database Descriptions
33 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS:
rr-CERCLIS-bb
Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998
CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.

Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
CERCLIS Liens: rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb
A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014
RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur.

EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site.

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018
RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: rr-RCRA TSD-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018
RCRA Generator List: rr-RCRA LQG-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018
RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA SQG-bb
RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month.

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018

CERCLIS
IODI

CERCLIS NFRAP

CERCLIS LIENS

RCRA CORRACTS

RCRA TSD

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG
34 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA CESQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018
RCRA Non-Generators: rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Apr 12, 2018
Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: rr-FED ENG-bb
Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016
Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: rr-FED INST-bb
Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site.

Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1982-1986
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1987-1989
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS-bb
Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017
The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Feb 20, 2018
FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: rr-FEMA UST-bb
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017

RCRA CESQG

RCRA NON GEN

FED ENG

FED INST
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

FEMA UST
35 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 LIEN on Property: rr-SEMS LIEN-bb
The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program.

Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018
Superfund Decision Documents: rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb
This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).

Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2018
State
State Response Sites: rr-RESPONSE-bb
A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database is state equivalent NPL.

Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018
EnviroStor Database: rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb
The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS.

Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018
Delisted State Response Sites: rr-DELISTED ENVS-bb
Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018
Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): rr-SWF/LF-bb
The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites.

Government Publication Date: May 7, 2018
EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities: rr-HWP-bb
A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database.

Government Publication Date: May 31, 2018
Land Disposal Sites: rr-LDS-bb
Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills.

Government Publication Date: Dec 04, 2017
Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report: rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports: rr-LUST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency.

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD

RESPONSE

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF
HWP
LDS
SWAT
LUST
36 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018
Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED LST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures.

Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018
Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker: rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Mar 11, 2018
Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels: rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit.

Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006
Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases: rr-UST CLOSURE-bb List of UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2018
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database: rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker.

Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015
Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST-bb
A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM.

Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009
Delisted Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED TNK-bb
This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM).

Government Publication Date: Mar 11, 2018
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-CERS TANK-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions: rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions.

Government Publication Date: Apr 18, 2018
Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions: rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.

DELISTED LST
UST

SWRCB SWF

UST CLOSURE
HHSS
AST

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK
LUR
HLUR
37 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2018
Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions: rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials.

Government Publication Date: Jan 11, 2018
Voluntary Cleanup Program: rr-VCP-bb
List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services.

Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018
GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data: rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb
A list of cleanup sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups.

Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2018
Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-DELISTED CTNK-bb This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal.

Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary: rr-HIST TANK-bb The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated.

Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988
Tribal
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN LUST-bb LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN UST-bb USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2017
Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Oct 14, 2017
County
Delisted County Records: rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb
Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds.

DEED
VCP

CLEANUP SITES

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED ILST

DELISTED IUST

DELISTED COUNTY
38 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Government Publication Date: May 30, 2018
Kern County AST List: rr-KERN AST-bb
A list of aboveground storage tanks in the county of Kern. This list is made available by Kern County Public Health Services Department.

Government Publication Date: Jun 15, 2018
Riverside County Local Oversight Program List: rr-RIVERSIDE LOP-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. Environmental Cleanup Program provides oversight of assessments and cleanups at properties that have been, or may have been, contaminated with hazardous substances from LUSTs or releases associated with other commercial/industrial use.

Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018
Riverside County Underground Storage Tanks List: rr-UST RIVERSIDE-bb A list of registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites in Riverside County. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. The Hazardous Materials Management Branch (HMMB) regulates and oversees the inspections of constructions, repairs, upgrades, system operation and removal of UST systems.

Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018
Santa Clara County - Sunnyvale City CUPA List: rr-SUNNYVALE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Sunnyvale City, Santa Clara County. This list is made available by the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials division of the Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety.

Government Publication Date: Jun 14, 2018
Additional Environmental Record Sources
Federal
Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel.

Government Publication Date: Apr 17, 2018
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: rr-TRIS-bb
The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2016
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation.

Government Publication Date: Sep 11, 2017
National Clandestine Drug Labs: rr-NCDL-bb
The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy.

Government Publication Date: Dec 21, 2017
Toxic Substances Control Act: rr-TSCA-bb

KERN AST

RIVERSIDE LOP

UST RIVERSIDE

SUNNYVALE CUPA

FINDS/FRS
TRIS
HMIRS
NCDL
TSCA
39 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI).

Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2017
Hist TSCA: rr-HIST TSCA-bb
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006
FTTS Administrative Case Listing: rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb
An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
FTTS Inspection Case Listing: rr-FTTS INSP-bb
An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
Potentially Responsible Parties List: rr-PRP-bb
Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site.

Government Publication Date: Oct 10, 2017
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports.

Government Publication Date: Nov 18, 2016
Drycleaner Facilities: rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments.

Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016
Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb
List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment).

Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
40 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Formerly Used Defense Sites: rr-FUDS-bb
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Government Publication Date: Nov 22, 2016
Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): rr-MLTS-bb
A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016.

Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2017
Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010
Mines Master Index File: rr-MINES-bb
The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself.

Government Publication Date: Jul 31, 2017
Alternative Fueling Stations: rr-ALT FUELS-bb
List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups.

Government Publication Date: Apr 25, 2018
Registered Pesticide Establishments: rr-SSTS-bb
List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Mar 1, 2018
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: rr-PCB-bb
Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number.

Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2017
State
EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement: rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked in the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) EnviroStor.

Government Publication Date: May 28, 2018
Clandestine Drug Lab Sites: rr-CDL-bb
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
School Property Evaluation Program Sites: rr-SCH-bb
FUDS
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES

ALT FUELS
SSTS
PCB

INSP COMP ENF
CDL
SCH
41 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school.

Government Publication Date: Feb 26, 2018
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).

Government Publication Date: Jun 19, 2018
Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZNET-bb
A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016
Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup: rr-HWSS CLEANUP-bb The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Feb 1, 2018
List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action: rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment.

Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016
Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992
Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).

Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993
Historical Cortese List: rr-HIST CORTESE-bb
List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites.

Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008
Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders.

Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2012
Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator.

Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018
CHMIRS
HAZNET

HWSS CLEANUP

DTSC HWF

HIST MANIFEST

HIST CHMIRS

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

DELISTED HAZ
42 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2018
Delisted Drycleaners: rr-DELISTED DRYC-bb
Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Jun 21, 2018
Waste Discharge Requirements: rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb
List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

Government Publication Date: May 30, 2018
Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities: rr-EMISSIONS-bb
A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. This program requires emission inventory updates every four years.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2015
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-CERS HAZ-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs:

Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2018
Tribal
No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
Riverside County Hazardous Waste Generator Sites List: rr-RIVERSIDE HWG-bb A list of Hazardous Waste Generator Sites in the County of Riverside. This list is made available by Riverside County Department of Environmental Health which has been designated as the CUPA for the County.

Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018
Riverside County Disclosure Facility List: rr-RIVERSIDE HZH-bb A list of facilities disclosed to Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (DEH). This list is made available by Riverside County DEH which has been designated as the CUPA for the County. A business is required to establish and submit a Business Plan if the facility handles hazardous material equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds or 200 cubic feet at any time during the year.

Government Publication Date: Feb 15, 2018

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYC

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS

CERS HAZ

RIVERSIDE HWG

RIVERSIDE HZH
43 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180717212 h-Definitions
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.

Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.

Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation.

Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report.

Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation.

Source: Google Elevation API.

Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections:
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.

Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property.

The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.

Definitions

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix D
Additional Documentation
¾
__________________
_________________________________

APN(s)
Riverside County Parcel Report

MAPS/IMAGES
766070003, 766070006, 766070012, 764200076, 764210007, 764210029, 764210028, 766080004, 76608000 766080001, 766080002
PARCEL
Previous APN
APN
Owners Not Available Online
764-200-076-0 76420007
764-210-007-9 76421000
764-210-028-8 76421002
764-210-029-9 76421002
766-070-003-7 76607000
766-070-006-0 76607000
766-070-012-5 76607001
766-080-001-6 76608000
766-080-002-7 76608000
766-080-004-9 76608000
766-080-005-0 76608000
764-200-013
764-210-001
764-210-009
764-210-009
000-000-000
000-000-000
766-070-005
000-000-000
000-000-000
000-000-000
000-000-000
Address

NOT AVAILABLE
764-200-076

NOT AVAILABLE
764-210-007

NOT AVAILABLE
764-210-028

NOT AVAILABLE
764-210-029

NOT AVAILABLE
766-070-003

NOT AVAILABLE
766-070-006

NOT AVAILABLE
766-070-012

NOT AVAILABLE
766-080-001

NOT AVAILABLE
766-080-002

NOT AVAILABLE
766-080-004

Legal Description
Mailing Address

NOT AVAILABLE
766-080-005
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
764-200-076
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
764-210-007
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
764-210-028
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
764-210-029
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-070-003
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-070-006
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-070-012
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-080-001
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-080-002
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-080-004
81570 CARBONERAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
766-080-005
Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
764-200-076
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
764-210-007
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
764-210-028
0 Lot Size
Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
764-210-029
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-070-003
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-070-006
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-070-012
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-080-001
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-080-002
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-080-004
0 Subdivision Name:

Recorded Book/Page:

Lot/Parcel:

Tract Number:

Block:
766-080-005
0 Recorded lot size is 17.26 acres
764-200-076
Recorded lot size is 16.95 acres
764-210-007
Recorded lot size is 0.5 acres
764-210-028
Recorded lot size is 0.1 acres
764-210-029

Property
Characteristics
Recorded lot size is 45 acres
766-070-003
Recorded lot size is 101.65 acres
766-070-006
Recorded lot size is 29.54 acres
766-070-012
Recorded lot size is 20.08 acres
766-080-001
Recorded lot size is 20.08 acres
766-080-002
Recorded lot size is 79.09 acres
766-080-004
Recorded lot size is 37.37 acres
766-080-005

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION

UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: YES
Central Cool: YES
Central Heat: YES
764-200-076
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
764-210-007

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION

UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: YES
Central Cool: YES
Central Heat: YES
764-210-028

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION

UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Year Constructed:
764-210-029

UNKNOWN
Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Pool: YES
Central Cool: YES
Central Heat: YES
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-070-003
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-070-006
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-070-012
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-080-001
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Year Constructed:
766-080-002

Supervisorial District
Township/Range
Thomas Bros. Maps
Page/Grid
Elevation Range (ft.)
City Boundary
Annexation Date
LAFCO Case
City Spheres of
Influence
Indian Tribal Land
0 UNKNOWN
Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-080-004
0000
0 0

SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION
0 UNKNOWN
Number of Baths:

Number of Bedrooms:

Construction Type:

Garage Type:

Property Area (sq ft):

Roof Type:

Number of Stories:

Year Constructed:

Pool: NO
Central Cool: NO
Central Heat: NO
766-080-005
V MANUEL PEREZ, DISTRICT 4
T6SR7E SEC 27 SW
T6SR7E SEC 28 SW
T6SR7E SEC 27 NW
T6SR7E SEC 28 SE
T6SR7E SEC 28 NW
T6SR7E SEC 28 NE
-56 - 160
Page: 5530 GRID: C6
Page: 5530 GRID: D7
Page: 5530 GRID: B7
Page: 5530 GRID: C7
Page: 5590 GRID: C2
Page: 5590 GRID: D1
Page: 5590 GRID: B1
Page: 5590 GRID: C1
Not in a Tribal Land

LA QUINTA
Not in a city sphere
6/26/2002 12:00:00 AM
8/13/2002 12:00:00 AM
2001-35-4
PLANNING more...

ENVIRONMENTAL more...

Airport Compatibility
Zones
General Plan Policy
Areas
Agricultural Preserve
Area Plan (RCIP)
Community Advisory
Councils
Zoning Classifications
(ORD. 348)
Land Use
Designations
General Plan Policy
Overlays
Zoning Overlays
Airport Influence
Areas
Specific Plans
Zoning Districts/Areas
Historical Preservation
Districts
CVMSHCP (Coachella
Valley Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation
Plan) Plan Area
CVMSHCP Fluvial Sand
Transport Special
Provision Areas
March Joint Powers
Authority
Proposals
County Service Area
Residential Permit
Statistics
CVMSHCP (Coachella
Valley Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation
Plan) Conservation
Area
2002-4-4
N/A
Not in the jurisdiction of the March Joint
Powers Authority
Not in a County Service Area
Not in a Specific Plan
CITY
Not in a General Plan Policy Area
Western Coachella Valley
Not in a General Plan Policy Area
Contact the
city for more
information
Zoning: CZ Number:

Not in a Zoning Overlay
Not in a Historical Preservation District
Not in an Agricultural Preserve

NOT IN AN AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA

NOT IN AN AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONE
Not in a Zone District/Area
Not in a Community Advisory Council
Final
Expected Units:

BRS Permit Units:

Current Permits:
% of Expected:

Cumulative Total:

N/A
Issued Active

COACHELLA VALLEY

NOT COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION

NOT IN A FLUVIAL SAND TRANSPORT

FIRE

DEVELOPMENT FEES
Vegetation (2005)
Provision Areas
WRMSHCP (Western
Riverside County
Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan) Plan
Area
WRMSHCP (Western
Riverside County
Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan) Cell
Group
WRMSHCP Cell Number
Fire Responsibility
Area
Fire Hazard
Classification (Ord.
787)
CVMSHCP (Coachella
Valley Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation
Plan) Fee Area (Ord
875)
Western TUMF
(Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee
Ord. 824)
Road & Bridge Benefit
District
Eastern TUMF
(Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee
Ord. 673)
DIF (Development
Impact Fee Area Ord.
659)
SKR Fee Area
(Stephen’s Kagaroo
Rat Ord. 663.10)
WRMSHCP (Western
Riverside County
Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan)
Fee Area (Ord 810)
HANS/ERP (Habitat
Acquisition and
Negotiation
Strategy/Expedited
Review Process)
Not in the Western Riverside County MSHCP
Fee Area
Not in a Cell Group
Not in a Cell Number
Project: N/A
Notes:

Status:

LMS Case:

Intake Num:

Conserve:

No Vegetation
Not in a Fire Hazard Zone
Not in a Fire Responsibility Area

COACHELLA VALLEY
Not in the Western Riverside County MSHCP
Fee Area
Not in the Western TUMF Fee Area
IN OR PARTIALLY WITHIN A TUMF FEE AREA.

NOT IN AN ROAD/BRIDGE BENEFIT

DISTRICT
WESTERN COACHELLA VALLEY, AREA 2
Not in the SKR Fee Area

GEOLOGIC

HYDROLOGY
TRANSPORTATION more...

Development
Agreements
Transportation
Agreements
CETAP (Community
and Environmental
Transportation
Acceptability Process)
Corridors
Circulation Element
Ultimate Right-of-Way
Road Book Page
Flood Control District
Flood Plain Review
Water District
Watershed
Fault Zone
Liquefaction Potential
Subsidence
Paleontological
Sensitivity
Faults
Agreement # 42
Amendment #
Expiration Date Line

IN OR PARTIALLY WITHIN A CIRCULATION
222
Contract Number: Not in a Trans Agreement
Not in a CETAP Corridor
*MAYBE REQUIRED, CONTACT

OUTSIDE FLOODPLAIN, REVIEW NOT

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

WHITEWATER

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

NOT IN A FAULT ZONE

NOT IN A FAULT LINE
High
Low
Moderate
Active
Susceptible
HIGH SENSITIVITY (HIGH A): BASED ON

GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS OR MAPPABLE

ROCK UNITS THAT ARE ROCKS THAT

CONTAIN FOSSILIZED BODY ELEMENTS,

AND TRACE FOSSILS SUCH AS TRACKS,
NESTS AND EGGS. THESE FOSSILS

OCCUR ON OR BELOW THE SURFACE
LOW POTENTIAL (L): FOLLOWING A

LITERATURE SEARCH, RECORDS CHECK

AND A FIELD SURVEY, AREAS MAY BE

DETERMINED BY A QUALIFIED

VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST AS

HAVING LOW POTENTIAL FOR CONTAINING

SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SUBJECT TO ADVERSE
IMPACTS.

UNDETERMINED POTENTIAL (U): AREAS

UNDERLAIN BY SEDIMENTARY ROCKS FOR

WHICH LITERATURE AND UNPUBLISHED

STUDIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE HAVE

UNDETERMINED POTENTIAL FOR

CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. THESE

AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED BY A FIELD

SURVEY CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST.

MISCELLANEOUS
School Districts
Farmland
Lighting (Ord. 655)
Communities
2010 Census Tract
Tax Rate Area &
District Name
Special Notes

CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. THESE

AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED BY A FIELD

SURVEY CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGIST.

COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED
Not in a community
Zone: B
456.05
456.08

LOCAL IMPORTANCE

OTHER LANDS

OTHER LANDS
PLEASE REFER TO ORDINANCE 457.96 FOR

WITHIN IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT UTILITY
020148 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2
020148 - CITY OF LA QUINTA
020148 - CO FREE LIBRARY
020148 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED
020148 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
020148 - CSA 152
020148 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL
020148 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT
020148 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE
020148 - GENERAL
020148 - GENERAL PURPOSE
020148 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW
020148 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL
020148 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP
020148 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION
020149 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2
020149 - CITY OF LA QUINTA
020149 - CO FREE LIBRARY
020149 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED
020149 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
020149 - CSA 152
020149 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL
020149 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS
020149 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT
020149 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE
020149 - GENERAL
020149 - GENERAL PURPOSE
020149 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW
020149 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL
020149 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP
020149 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION
020150 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2
020150 - CITY OF LA QUINTA
020150 - CO FREE LIBRARY
020150 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED
020150 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
020150 - CSA 152
020150 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL
020150 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS
020150 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT
020150 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE
020150 - GENERAL
020150 - GENERAL PURPOSE
020150 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW
020150 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL
020150 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP
020150 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION
020195 - CITRUS PEST CONTROL 2
020195 - CITY OF LA QUINTA
020195 - CO FREE LIBRARY
020195 - CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT BLO HS
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY PUBLIC
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY REC & PK
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY RESOURCE
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED
020195 - COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
020195 - CSA 152
020195 - CV MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL
020195 - CVWD IMP DIST 1 DS
020195 - CVWD IMP DIST 55
020195 - CVWD STORM WATER UNIT
020195 - DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE
020195 - GENERAL
020195 - GENERAL PURPOSE
020195 - LA QUINTA NO-LOW
020195 - RDV PROJ 4-THERMAL
020195 - RIV CO REGIONAL PARK & OPEN SP
020195 - RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION

Status
Case Case Description
Survey Cases
Case Description
Administrative Cases

PLUS PERMITS & CASES
Building and Safety Cases
Planning Cases
Status
Status
Case
Fire Cases
Status
Case Description
Case Case Description
Status
Case Description
Case
Case
Case Status
Code Cases
Case Description

N/A N/A N/A
035324 100 AMP CH OF SERVICE TO PUMP FINAL
081049 SVC CHANGE 40HP & 3 HP FINAL
150105 CHG OF SVC (200AMP)TO DWELL FINAL
201569 GRADING 779CY CUT/3867CY FILL ISSUED
204932 100AMP SVC TO 5HP WELL PUMP FINAL
205222 DWELL 4003SF W/ATT GAR 701SF DWELLY R-3 WOOD 4003 110483 PRIGRY M-1 WOOD 701 6379 AIRY R-3 R 4003 8807 PATY M V-N 1515 7424
FINAL
309121 REPAIR EX. OVERHANG (VAL$3000) ISSUED
347085 ELECTRICAL UPGRADE/REPLACE A/C UNIT ISSUED
361264 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO DWELLING ISSUED
BZ258481 M/H SITE PREP FINAL
BZ258482 TRAP & SKEET BLDGS FINAL
BZ258483 COMM COAC INSTALL FINAL
BZ260903 M/H SITE PREP FINAL
BZ272130 PLAN CHECK DWL & GAR FINAL
BZ272220 DWG & ATT GAR FINAL
BZ320815 SITE PREP FINAL
BZ326168 PLAN CHECK DWLG & ATT GAR FINAL
BZ326169 200 AMP SVC TO 15HP & 40HP MTR FINAL
BZ332931 DWLG & ATT GAR FINAL
BZ332932 RELOCATE AWNING EXPIRED
BZ375505 SITE PREP MOBILE HOME ISSUED
BZ399534 ADD HEATERS AND ELECTRIC TO GREENHOUSE FINAL
BZA001690 M/H SET UP (SANDPOINTE 12*60) FINAL
BZH00194 M/H INSTL (SKYLINE 12*64) FINAL
BZH04457 M/H INSTALLATION (24X61 LA PAZ) FINAL

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
CFG01647 F & G FOR EIR 232 (SP00218A1) $850.00 PAID
CUP02388 PROPOSAL FOR TRAP SKEET AND PISTOL SHOOTING RANGE EXPIRED CZ05134 CHANGE OF ZONE FROM ? TO SP EA 31647, EIR 232, SP 218, DA 42 APPROVED CZ06454 CHANGE ZONING IN SP218A1 APPROVED
EA37465 EA FOR SPOO218A1 APPROVED
EA38124 EA FOR GPA00546 COUNTY INITIATED APPLIED
GPA00493 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CORAL MT SP218A1 APPROVED GPA00546 ADD MADISON ST AS AN ARTERIAL HWY BETW 60TH & 62ND APPLIED SP00218 SP ON 1251 ACRES WITH 4262 DU'S ON 795 ACRES, 35 A CRES OF COMMERCIAL, 1 ACRE FIRE STATION, * EA 31647, EIR 232, CZ 5134, DA 42

APPROVED
SP00218A1 AMENDMENT TO SP 218 APPROVED
MAP31249 ISSUED
MAP31399 ISSUED

Maps, permit information and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user.

Permit Approved Date
Application Date Plan Check Approved Date
Septic Permits
Record Id PE
Record Id
Permit Paid Date
Well Water Permits
Final Inspection Date
Well Finaled Date
Approved Date
* DISCLAIMER *
Case Status
Transportation Cases
Case Description
DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERMITS
MAP31681 ISSUED
MAP34644 ISSUED

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
WP0020690 Well Abandonment 10 Mar 2010 10 Mar 2010

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix E
Qualifications Statement

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Earth Systems Pacific
Qualifications Statement for Environmental Work
The principals of the Earth Systems Pacific companies have been consulting for an average of over 20 years, and the combined staff numbers nearly 100.   Earth Systems Pacific’s multidisciplinary professional staff has extensive experience with and education in chemistry, geology, geophysics, hydrogeology, mechanical engineering, civil engineering, mapping,soilscience, drafting, and surveying.

Our senior project and staff professionals include Certified Engineering Geologists, Registered Geologists, Registered Environmental Assessors and Professional Engineers.  These professionals are highly qualified, holding an average of two registrations and/or certifications in their area of expertise.

To continue to meet our commitment to technical expertise, Earth Systems Pacific considersit essential to train our personnel in the latest scientific advancements in assessment and mitigation techniques.

This involves continuing education in the form of training seminars, literature reviews, and pertinent conferences to remain abreast of recent developments in this complex and rapidly changing field.

The Environmental Professional [EP] who provided oversight for this project meets the qualifications specified by US EPA AAI and ASTM E1527‐13.  An EP is defined by US EPA AAI as ”a person who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (of hazardous substances) on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors (of the rule).”  In addition, an environmental professional must have:
 A state, tribal, or territory‐issued certification or license (Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist) and three years of relevant full‐time work experience; or  A Baccalaureate degree or higher in science or engineering and five years of relevant full‐time work experience; or
 Ten years of relevant full‐time work experience.

The attached resumes describe the credentials of the professionals who performed field, research and/or report preparation work on the project.

Earth Systems Resume
Alexander Schriener Jr., P.G.   Associate Geologist
Mr. Schriener has over thirty‐seven years as an alternative energy, natural resource and environmental geologist.   He has seven years consulting experience specifically in the field of environmental geology.  Mr. Schriener also manages geothermal energy services for Earth Systems.

Key Qualifications:

Mr. Schriener experience performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater contamination at industrial, commercial, residential and agricultural properties, as well as vacant land.  He has performed Phase II Investigations to evaluate whether contamination is actually present, and the concentration and extent of those contaminants.  If contaminates are found, then site remediation is required.  Mr. Schriener has successfully performed numerous Phase III site remediation and brought sites to closure with public agencies.

Mr. Schriener has over thirty years’ experience in geothermal resource management, development and exploration.

Mr. Schriener has also been an expert witness in legal proceedings involving geothermal energy management and well drilling.

Relevant Project Experience:

Gasoline Station Investigation and Closure
Mr. Schriener was project manager for an assessment of gasoline stations with potential leaking underground storage tanks.  He placed monitoring wells, completed groundwater and soil assessments and successfully got agency closure on 5 of 7 sites he was managed between 2004 and 2008.

Phase II Site Assessments and Phase III Site Closure
Mr. Schriener was project manager on numerous Phase II site assessments in the Coachella Valley and southern California.  At each site, he selected the investigative methods, oversaw sampling and analysis activities, reviewed the laboratory data, and prepared a report meeting the requirements of the lender or agency.  If contamination was found, Mr. Schriener prepared a work plan to mitigate the site and obtain closure.  Significant sites that were evaluated and closure was obtained included several parcels of farm land over 20 acres each, a metal salvage yard, an industrial warehouse, a former cattle ranch and former sewage treatment facility.

Geothermal Exploration and Development
Mr. Schriener over thirty years’ experience in geothermal energy including geology, geochemistry, geophysics, drilling, reservoir modeling, land leasing, exploration, and field development.  He has managed the resource staff and activities in the three major geothermal fields in California: The Geysers, Coso and The Salton Sea, as well as Desert Peak in Nevada and Roosevelt/Blundell in Utah.  Mr. Schriener has regularly managed an annual drilling and resource department budget of over $10 Million. .

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Geologist, State of California,
2001 (No. 7198)

EDUCATION
B.S., Geology
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 1976
M.S., Geology
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 1978
MS Thesis; The Geology and Mineralization
of the Northern Part of the Washougal
Mining District, Skamania County,
Washington.

Professional Affiliations:

Member: Geological Society of America
Member: American Association of
Petroleum Geologists.

Member: Geothermal Resources Council
Publications
19 publications and field trip guidebooks,
including published in: Geological Society of
America, Association of Petroleum
Geologists, United States Geological Survey
Open File Report, Stanford Geothermal
Program Conference, Geothermal
Resources Council Transactions,
Department of Energy, Journal of Scientific
Drilling, and Geochemistry, Geophysics and
Geosystems.

EMAIL
[email protected]

PRIME OFFICE LOCATION
Bermuda Dunes, CA
Earth Systems Resume
Kirsten L. Murch Project Geologist

Employed with Earth Systems’ Bermuda Dunes office since 2000, Ms.

Murch is the project coordinator for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment projects in our environmental services department.   In this capacity, she coordinates all aspects regarding these projects, including fieldwork and report preparation. Ms. Murch also coordinates and conducts site characterizations (Phase II), including fieldwork, data evaluation, and report preparation.

KEY QUALIFICATIONS
 Project manager for, and conducts environmental site
assessments (Phase I) according to EPA All Appropriate Inquiry guidelines and entailing site reconnaissance, historical research, regulatory agency records and database searches, aerial photograph review, and final report preparation.
 Performs site characterizations (Phase II) entailing supervision of subcontractors, subsurface exploration, sampling of soil and groundwater, chemical analyses of samples, evaluation of laboratory data, preparation of final report including
recommendations for remediation.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Stream Gauging Study.  Ms. Murch participated in a multi‐ location stream‐gauging program being conducted to evaluate water quality of a primary drainage channel as part of a watershed management project.  Tasks included the initial design of the stream gauging protocol, selection of equipment, and writing a Standard Operating Procedure manual for stream gauging for review and approval by the US EPA, and conducting the stream gauging activities. Ms. Murch was involved with establishing gauging transects, testing and refining the equipment operations protocols, conducting the stream gauging, data evaluation, quality control oversight, and report preparation.  Proposed School Site Preliminary Endangerment Assessments (PEAs) and Supplemental Site Investigations (SSIs).  Ms. Murch has conducted and/or assisted in conducting several PEAs and/or SSIs for the Corona‐Norco Unified School District (CNUSD), the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD), and the Palo Verde Unified School District (PVUSD) in California in liaison with the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).
 Environmental Site Assessments.  Ms. Murch has conducted over three hundred ESAs in the Coachella Valley of California, southeastern California, and high desert areas of southern California.

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA 40‐Hour HAZWOPER Course

EDUCATION
B.A. Geology, Archaeology Minor, Smith
College 1997

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Sigma Xi Associate Member
EMAIL
[email protected]

PRIME OFFICE LOCATION
Bermuda Dunes, CA

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Appendix F
Reliance Form

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Application for Authorization to Rely on Environmental Report This form serves as an application for third parties to apply for permission to use and rely on the referenced report [Report].  It is the applicant’sresponsibility to obtain the approval of the original client prior to submitting the form.  As a condition of approval for authorization to use and rely on the referenced Report, applicant agrees to waive any conflict of interest arising out of, and applicant will not object to, our representation of our original client; that Earth Systems Pacific’s liability for errors and omissions from the Report shall be limited to $15,000; and Earth Systems Pacific shall have no liability for any other cause or action.  Use of this Report without written permission releases Earth Systems Pacific from any liability that may arise from the use of this Report.

Reference:   Report of Environmental Site Assessment, 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street, W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, File No. 300300‐ 005, Doc. No. 18‐08‐702, dated August 3, 2018.

Original Client: Sunrise Company, 300 Eagle Dance Circle, Palm Desert, California 92211, Mr. Phillip K. Smith (760) 772‐7227
To be completed by Applicant.   A processing fee of $200 made payable to Earth Systems Pacific must accompany application.  Submit to Earth Systems Pacific, 79811 Country Club Drive, Indio, California 92203.

Signature signifies applicant’s acceptance of the use and liability limitations described above, and caveats described below*.

By:
(Company Name)                           (Print Name)

(Address)                            (Signature)
Title:
(City, State, Zip)
Date:
(Telephone)              (FAX)
Approval of Original Client
By:
(Print Name)                                 (Signature) For Earth Systems Pacific’s use only
Approved for re‐use with caveat that findings discussed in Report were based on available information and site conditions as noted at time of Report, but may not be applicable to current site conditions.

Disapproved (application fee to be refunded).

By:   Date:
(Earth Systems Pacific)
*Caveats ‐ Applicant understands and agrees that the referenced Report is a copyrighted document, that Earth Systems Pacific is the copyright owner, and that unauthorized use or copying of the Report isstrictly prohibited without the express written permission of Earth Systems Pacific.  Applicant understandsthat Earth Systems Pacific may withhold such permission at itssole discretion, or grant permission upon such terms and conditions as it deems acceptable.   Applicant acknowledges that: (1) Earth Systems Pacific did not have an opportunity to evaluate the applicant’s relationship to the site; (2) Applicant‐specific information can affect the conclusions and recommendations presented in the Report; (3) The Report speaks only to conditions observed onsite at the time of the site visit, and site conditions may have changed since that time; (4) The scope of the Report was limited to the scope defined by our proposal; (4) The shelf life of the Report, as defined by the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry [AAI] guidelines, is six months (the Report expires after six months and should not be relied upon without an update in accordance with the AAI guidelines); and, (5) Earth Systems Pacific maintains its contract with the original client for the Report.

Sunrise Company
300 Eagle Dance Circle
Palm Desert, California 92211
Job No.: 300300‐007
Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R
Revised Report of
Preliminary Phase II Investigation for
Organochlorine Pesticides
377.206 Acres West of Madison
W of Madison Street, S of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California
September 10, 2018
Revised September 17, 2018
© 2018 Earth Systems Pacific
Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Earth Systems Pacific.

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
September 10, 2018 File No. 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018 Doc. No. 18‐09‐703R
Sunrise Company
300 Eagle Dance Circle
Palm Desert, California 92211
Attention: Mr. Phillip K. Smith
Subject: Revised Report of Preliminary Phase II Investigation for Organochlorine Pesticides Project: 377.206 Acres West of Madison
West of Madison Street, South of Avenue 58, North of Avenue 60 La Quinta, Riverside County, California
Earth Systems Pacific [Earth Systems] has completed a limited surface investigation to evaluate the potential presence of regulated levels of pesticides, regarding the site referenced above.  This report has been prepared to document our activities and present our findings, conclusions and recommendations in accordance with Proposal No.: BER‐18‐8‐004, Reference File No.: 300300‐ 005, dated August 8, 2018.  This report was revised to correct the identification of a street name.

No conclusions or recommendations have been changed.

Background
The site consists of approximately 377.206 acres of fallow agricultural land and former building sites located west of Madison Street, south of Avenue 58 and north of Avenue 60 in La Quinta, Riverside County, California.   Earth Systems recently completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the site (Earth Systems Pacific, 2018). There were 7 Recognized Environmental Concerns [RECs] identified that require additional field work.  These include:
1) AC pipe found onsite that should be properly removed by a licensed asbestos‐removal contractor.
2) The potential that former building areas may contain abandoned underground storage tanks and or septic systems.  A geophysical survey for these features is warranted and, if found, appropriate soil sampling for the potential presence of contaminants. 3) Prior limited soil sampling and testing for currently banned Organochlorine Pesticides [OCPs] by Earth Systems (Earth Systems, 2007) in parts of the site associated with location of irrigation laterals, revealed levels of OCPs above levels of regulatory concern.   Thus, additional soil sampling and analysis is warranted for former buildings locations and agricultural areas of the site.
4) Arsenic‐based pesticides were also commonly used at the same time as banned OCPs.  Testing for arsenic in soil samples that have elevated levels of OPCs is warranted.

September 10, 2018  ‐ 2 ‐  Job No.: 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018   Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
5) There is the potential for the presence of lead residue in the soil around buildings from lead‐ based paint.  Soil sampling with analysis is warranted. 6) Abandonment of known old water wells onsite is warranted. 7) There is the potential for the presence of heavy metals in the soil relative to the trap and skeet buildings.  If this is a concern, soil sampling with analysis could be conducted.

This study involves only recommendation 3; the investigation of the presence of DDT and related OCPs on site.  The other 6 recommendations can be done later, as warranted.

To investigate the presence of OCPs, 56 surface samples were collected in the fields and composited into 14 sets of 4 samples each.  Twenty‐four samples were collected around the former residences and buildings.  Of these samples, 8 composite samples were selected from the field areas (that showed most obvious prior agricultural usage), and 10 samples from the former building areas were analyzed for OCPs.

Site Description
The site consists of approximately 377.206 acres of fallow agricultural land located south of Avenue 58, west of Madison Street and north of Avenue 60 in La Quinta, California (Figure 1).

The site is bounded on the north by Avenue 58, the east by a residential development, and the south and west by undeveloped land (Figure 2).  At the time of the sampling most of the site was fallow (Photo 1).  Five possible residences formally existed on site, and currently only the shell of one structure exists on the site (Photo 2).   All that remains of the other four structures is disturbed ground.

Generally, the soils exposed around the site were sandy silt to silty sand, typical of lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla, with evidence of gastropod and bivalve shells from the former lake deposits.

Geology and Hydrogeology
The site is located in the Coachella Valley of Southern California.  The Coachella Valley is part of the tectonically active Salton Trough, which is a closed, internally draining basin bound by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest; the San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest; and the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains to the northeast and east.

These mountain ranges, and the basement rock underlying the Coachella Valley, are primarily composed of granitic and metamorphic rock.  Within the Coachella Valley, the basement complex is overlain by a series of unconsolidated and semi‐consolidated continental clastic sediments eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges; lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla; and wind‐blown sand deposited in the active blow‐sand area of Riverside County (DWR, 1964).  The site is located on lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla.

The depth to groundwater at the site was evaluated by contacting Mr. Saul Montalvo with the Coachella Valley Water District [CVWD].  Mr. Montalvo indicated that the depth to groundwater September 10, 2018  ‐ 3 ‐  Job No.: 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018   Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
in the CVWD production well located approximately 0.3 miles south of the southeast corner of the site was 67.8 feet below ground surface [bgs] on June 26, 2018.  Note that the CVWD obtains depth to water information from production wells that tend to tap deeper aquifers and may not represent uppermost groundwater.  Note that CVWD recharge basins are located 0.1 milessouth of the site.

Purpose and Scope of Work
The purpose of this work isto evaluate the potential presence of pesticide residues at the former agricultural portion of site, with the chemicals of concern being OCPs.  The purpose was also to evaluate the presence of OCPs in the area around the former building areas, where such chemicals could have been applied for pest control, stored or mixed.

Tasks performed to accomplish this objective are outlined below.

Surface Sampling
The presence of surface contamination was evaluated by collecting surface soil samples.  The following samples were collected between August 13 and 15, 2018.  The approximate locations of the samples are shown on Figure 2 through 8 in Appendix A. 1) Fifty‐six surface samples (SS‐1 through SS‐56) were collected in former agricultural fields.

Each set of four adjoining primary samples were composited by the laboratory into one sample, for a total of 14 composite samples (Composite A through N).   Of these, 8 composite samples were analyzed for OCPs (Composite B‐E, and J‐M).  The other samples were held, pending results of the first set.
2) Twenty‐three surface samples were collected adjacent to the former buildings and the slab on site.  The samples collected were as follows:  Residence 1 (H1‐1 to H1‐5, Figure 3), Residence 2 (H2‐1 to H2‐5, Figure 4), Residence 3 (H3‐1 to H3‐3, Figure 5), Residence 4 (H4‐1 to H4‐5, Figure 6), Residence 5 (H5‐1 to H5‐3, Figure 7) and the slab (SB‐1 to SB‐3, Figure 8).  Of these 23 samples, 10 samples were analyzed for OCPs(H1‐1, H1‐3, H2‐1, H2‐ 4, H3‐1, H4‐3, H4‐4, H5‐1, H5‐2 and SB‐3).  The other samples were held, pending results of the first set.

The samples were collected at a depth of approximately 1 inch below the surface.  If needed, a disposable tool was used to move surface and plant debris out of the way of the sampling location.  The laboratory supplied sample container was then pushed directly into the exposed soil to collect a sample.  Each jar is sealed with a Teflon‐lined screw‐on lid.  The samples were labeled and logged onto a chain‐of‐custody form, placed into an ice‐chest, and transported to a California‐certified testing laboratory.

Laboratory Testing
Analysis of the collected samples was performed by A & R Laboratories, a California‐certified testing laboratory.  The analyses consisted of the following:

September 10, 2018  ‐ 4 ‐  Job No.: 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018   Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
1) Eight composite samples were analyzed for OCP residues using EPA method 8081A. 2) Ten discrete samples located in the general former building site area were analyzed for OCP residues, using EPA method 8081A.

A summary of the test results is presented in Table 1.  The laboratory report is presented in Appendix B.

Laboratory Results
Organochlorine Pesticides ‐ As shown in Table 1, all 8 composite soil samples taken in the former agricultural field and all 10 discrete soil samples taken in the general building areas contained traces of OCPs.
 In the field areas, DDE and DDT were detected in all the composite 8 samples analyzed.

DDD was detected in 4 of the 8 composite field samples.  Dieldrin was detected in 1 sample and Chlordane was detected in 5 of the 8 samples.   No other OCPs were detected in the composite samples.  None of the concentrations detected for any of the OCP compounds exceeded the Regional Screening Level for Residential [RSL‐R], a US EPA guideline for evaluating whether concentrations pose a health hazard under typical residential land‐use scenarios.  Total DDT (TDE), which is the additive sum of the DDT, DDE and DDD concentrations, is the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) which is the level that defines a compound as a regulated waste.  Four of the 8 composite samples collected in the fields (Composites B – E) exceeded the TTLC level for TDE.  In the building areas, DDE was detected in all the 10 samples analyzed.  DDT was detected in 3 of the 10 samples and DDD was not detected in any of the 10 samples.  Dieldrin was detected in 2 samples and Chlordane was detected in 1 of the 10 samples.   No other OCPs were detected in the samples around the former home sites.  None of the concentrations detected for any of the OCP compounds exceeded the RSL‐R.  None of the samples were over the TTLC TDE level that defines a compound as a regulated waste.

Summary
Based on the field activities and laboratory testing results, Earth Systems offers the following summary on this preliminary testing for OCPs:

1. Up to five OCPs were detected in all samples collected in the former agricultural field areas and around the five residences and slab.  DDE and DDT were detected in allsamples from the fields.  DDE was detected in all samples around the former residences and slab.

DDD, Dieldrin, and Chlordane were detected in selected othersamples.  Only one sample, Field composite sample K, had detectable amounts of all five OCPs.  Other OCPS were not detected.

September 10, 2018  ‐ 5 ‐  Job No.: 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018   Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

2. None of the surface soil samples collected in the fields or around the five former residences had levels of OCPs that exceeded the US EPA RSL‐R, a guideline used for determining if a compound or metal is a potential health hazard in residential building area.

3. Four of the eight composite samples collected in the former agricultural fields exceeded the TTLC limit for TDE (additive of the three total DDT compounds).  These areas were Composite Areas B, C, D and E.

4. Since half of the field samples analyzed for OPCs exceeded the TTLC level for TDE, and not all the fields were tested for OCPs, it isrecommended that any soil planned to be exported off the currentsite be tested for OCPs prior to export.  If found to exceed regulatory limits, the soil should be manifested appropriately.
‐o0o‐
Earth Systems appreciates the opportunity to assist you on the project.  If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (760) 345‐1588. Note that this report was prepared based on our proposal for scope of services and contract with our client, and may not meet the needs of other users. Use of this report by others is at the sole risk of the user.

Additional limitations on the use of this report are presented in Appendix C.

Respectfully submitted,

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
Alexander Schriener Jr., PG
Associate Geologist
Rpt/asj/cgj
Attachments: Appendix A – Figures, Photos and Tables
Appendix B – Laboratory Report
Appendix C – Limitations
September 10, 2018  ‐ 6 ‐  Job No.: 300300‐007
Revised September 17, 2018   Doc. No.: 18‐09‐703R

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC
References
California Department of Water Resources [DWR], 1964, Bulletin Number 108 – Coachella Valley Investigation, July 1964.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2008, Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision), California Environmental Protection Agency, Dated April 30, 2008.

Earth Systems Southwest, 2007, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update with Supplemental Pesticides Sampling West Andalusia – Irrigation Laterals, West of Madison Street Between Avenues 58 and 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, File No.:
09305‐08, Doc No.: 07‐01‐752, dated January 12, 2007.

Earth Systems Pacific, 2018, Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 377.206 Acres West of Madison Street, W. of Madison Street, S. of Avenue 58, N. of Avenue 60, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, File No.: 300300‐005, Doc. No. 18‐08‐702, dated August 3, 2018.

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photo‐revised 1980.

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Martinez Mountain, Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo‐ revised 1988.

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo‐revised 1972.

US Department of Environmental Protection, 2018, Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals Table.

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

APPENDIX A
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Former Agricultural Field Sample Location Map Figure 3 – H‐1 Former Building Site Sample Location Map Figure 4 – H‐2 Former Building Site Sample Location Map Figure 5 – H‐3 Former Building Site Sample Location Map Figure 6 – H‐4 Former Building Site Sample Location Map Figure 7 – H‐5 Former Building Site Sample Location Map Figure 8 – Slab Site Sample Location Map
Site Photographs
Table 1 – OCPs

Scale: 1" = 2,000’
0 2,000’ 4,000’
Figure 1
Site Location
Approximate Site Boundary
Base Map: USGS 7-1/2' Quadrangle, Indio, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972; La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle, 1959, photorevised 1980; Martinez Mtn., Calif. Quadrangle, 1981, photo-revised 1988; Valerie, Calif. Quadrangle, 1956, photo-revised 1972.

File No.: 300300-007
SITE
Earth Systems
/ϭϬ/2018
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

LEGEND
Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

Madison Street
Avenue 58
Avenue 60
H1
H2
H3
Concrete Slab
H4
H5
Figure 2
Sample Location Map
Approximate Scale: 1” = 575’
0 575’ 1,150’
SS-51
(Comp-E)
LEGEND
Approximate Sample Locations
Approximate Site Boundary
Approximate Building Site Area
Earth Systems
9/10/2018
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

File No.: 300300-007
SS-48
(Comp-L)
SS-47
(Comp-L)
SS-46
(Comp-L)
SS-45
(Comp-L)
SS-41
(Comp-K)
SS-42
(Comp-K)
SS-43
(Comp-K)
SS-44
(Comp-K)
SS-20
(Comp-E)
SS-19
(Comp-E)
SS-18
(Comp-E)
SS-17
(Comp-E)
SS-15
(Comp-D)
SS-16
(Comp-D)
SS-13
(Comp-D)
SS-14
(Comp-D)
SS-37
(Comp-J)
SS-38
(Comp-J)
SS-39
(Comp-J)
SS-40
(Comp-J)
SS-7
(Comp-B)
SS-6
(Comp-B)
SS-5
(Comp-B)
SS-8
(Comp-B)
SS-9
(Comp-C)
SS-10
(Comp-C)
SS-11
(Comp-C)
SS-12
(Comp-C)
SS-52
(Comp-M)
SS-51
(Comp-M)
SS-50
(Comp-M)
SS-49
(Comp-M)
SS-3
(Comp-A)
SS-4
(Comp-A)
SS-2
(Comp-A)
SS-1
(Comp-A)
SS-26
(Comp-G)
SS-25
(Comp-G)
SS-27
(Comp-G)
SS-28
(Comp-G)
SS-29
(Comp-H)
SS-32
(Comp-H)
SS-33
(Comp-I)
SS-34
(Comp-I)
SS-35
(Comp-I)
SS-36
(Comp-I) SS-31
(Comp-H)
SS-30
(Comp-H)
SS-56
(Comp-N)
SS-55
(Comp-N)
SS-54
(Comp-N)
SS-53
(Comp-N)
SS-22
(Comp-F) SS-21
(Comp-F)
SS-23
(Comp-F)
SS-24
(Comp-F)
Exceeded TDE TTLC Limit
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
Scale: 1" = 100’
0 100’ 200’
H-1 Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
9/10/2018
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

LEGEND
Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

H1-5 Approximate Sample Locations
H1-5
H1-2
H1-3
H1-4
H1-1
Well 1
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
Figure 3
Figure 4
Scale: 1" = 50’
0 50’ 100’
H-2 Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

H2-1
H2-4
H2-3
H2-2
H2-5
LEGEND
H2-5 Approximate Sample Locations
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
9/10/2018
Figure 5
Scale: 1" = 100’
0 100’ 200’
H-3 Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

H3-1
H3-2
H3-3
LEGEND
H3-3 Approximate Sample Locations
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
9/10/2018
Figure 6
Scale: 1" = 70’
0 70’ 140’
H-4 Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

H4-4
H4-3
H4-5
H4-2
H4-1
LEGEND
H4-5 Approximate Sample Locations
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
9/10/2018
Figure 7
Scale: 1" = 100’
0 100’ 200’
H-5 Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

H5-2
H5-1
H5-3
Well 4
LEGEND
H5-3 Approximate Sample Locations
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
9/10/2018
Figure 8
Scale: 1" = 50’
0 50’ 100’
Slab Pullout Sample Locations
File No.: 300300-007
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Reference: Google Earth satellite image dated February 17, 2018.

SB-3
SB-1
SB-2
Well 2
LEGEND
SB-3 Approximate Sample Locations
Less Than TDE TTLC Limit
Not Analyzed
9/10/2018
Site Photographs

Storm Drain Inlet
9/10/2018 File No.: 300300-007
Photo 1: Typical former agricultural field area at sample location SS-07.

Photo 2: Building area H-2. Location of H2-1 and H2-4.

SS-7
H2-1
H2-4
Earth Systems
377.206 Acres West of Madison Street
W. of Madison, S. of Avenue 58, N of Avenue 60
La Quinta, Riverside County, California

Table 1
Organochlorine Pesticides in Former Agricultural Fields and around Home Site EPA Method 8081
Collection
Date Area Composite/Sample ID 4,4-DDE 4,4-DDT 4,4-DDD Dieldrin Chlordane Other OCPs Field B (SS5-SS8) 1.4 0.062 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 0.018 ND Field C (SS9-SS12) 1.2 0.043 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND Field D (SS13-SS16) 1.5 0.037 0.022 ND< 0.002 0.020 ND
Field E (SS17-SS20) 1.4 0.048 0.025 ND< 0.002 0.016 ND
Field J (SS37-SS40) 0.57 0.026 0.019 ND< 0.002 0.011 ND Field K (SS41-SS44) 0.40 0.035 0.020 0.020 0.011 ND
Field L (SS45-SS48) 0.20 0.014 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND 15-Aug-18 Field M (SS49-SS52) 0.18 0.011 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND 13-Aug-18 home 3 H3-1 0.23 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND H1-1 0.0064 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND
H1-3 0.0020 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND
H2-1 0.060 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND
H2-4 0.070 0.062 ND< 0.002 0.0056 0.066 ND
H4-3 0.056 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010 ND
H4-4 0.020 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND
H5-1 0.012 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 0.012 ND< 0.020 ND
H5-2 0.092 0.018 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND <0.010
14-Aug-18 Slab SB-3 0.40 0.014 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.002 ND< 0.020 ND na na Various

1.7 mg/kg 1.7 mg/kg 2.4 mg/kg 0.034 mg/kg 1.7 mg/kg Various

7.0 mg/kg 7.0 mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg 0.14 mg/kg 7.7 mg/kg Various Notes: All concentrations in mg/kg.

Composite samples were made as shown by the laboratory.

ND - not detected greater than the listed detection limit. Na is not available Red high-lighted values exceed the TTLC guideline
Yellow high-lighted values exceed the Residential PRGs
13-Aug-18
14-Aug-18
14-Aug-18
home 1
home 2
home 4

1.0 mg/kg as sum total of DDT, DDE, DDD
(TDE)
Residential PRG
Industrial PRG
home 5
15-Aug-18
"Other OCPs" includes: Aldrin, Alpha-BHC, Beta-BHC, Delta-BHC, Gamma-BHC, Endosulfan I, Endosulfan II, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Endrin Ketone, Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide, and Methoxychlor
TTLC
ESP # 300300-007

EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC

APPENDIX B
Laboratory Reports

951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories, Inc.
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
08/22/2018 16:41:37 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1808-00158 Project Name / No. WEST OF MADISON-P-2 300300-007
Dates Sampled (from/to) 08/13/18 To 08/15/18
Dates Received (from/to) 08/15/18 To 08/15/18
Dates Reported (from/to) 08/22/18 To 8/22/2018
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

Subcontracting
Organic Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Other Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Sample Condition(s)
All samples intact
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories, Inc.
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]