Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
6 city ordinance.
b. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. c. A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law and by the city's building department.
d.
A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual chance flood (one -hundred-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in any official maps published by FEMA. If an applicant is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site sa tisfies this paragraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, the city shall not deny the application on the basis that the applicant did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by the city that is applicable to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this paragraph if either of the following are met:
i. The site has been subject to a letter of map revision prepared by FEMA and issued to the city; or
ii. The site meets FEMA requirements necessary to meet minimum floodplain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter 1 of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulationsas further spelled out in Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)(G)(ii).
e. A regulatory floodway as determined by FEMA in any of its official maps, published by FEMA unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
If an applicant is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this paragraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, the city shall not deny the application on the basis that the applicant did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by the city that is applicable to that site. d.f. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Ac (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), habitat conservation plan pu rsuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural resource protection plan. g. Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
7 (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).
e.h. Lands under a conservation easement.
5. The proposed lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income; b. Housing on a parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property exercised rights under Government Code Section 7060 et seq. to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within fifteen years before the date of the application; or
c. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.
6. The lot split does not result in more than two units on a parcel.
C.D.Standards and Requirements. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this municipal code to the contrary, the following requirements shall apply:
1. The lot split conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, Title 16 (Subdivisions) and Title 18 (Zoning) of the municipal code, except as the same are modified by this section.
2. No setback shall be required for an existing structure, or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
3. Except for circumstances described in subsection (C)(2) above, the setback for side and rear lot lines shall be four feet.
4. The applicant shall provide easements for the provision of public services and facilities as required.
5. Landlocked parcels created by an urban lot split shall have a frontage to the public right- of-way that is no less than ten feet in width resulting in the creation of a flag lot, provided that requiring the frontage does not preclude two eight-hundred-square-foot residential units from existing on each lot. Where a flag lot is not possible , an access easement over the other parcel on the same map shall be required. The easement shall be not less than ten feet in width and must connect to the same curb cut and apron as the other parcel on the same map.
6. Residential units developed on a lot created pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.122.
7. The split of the lot will not result in less than one parking space per unit. a. This does not apply in either of the following instances:
i. The parcel is located within one -half mile walking distance of either a high - quality transit corridor as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155 or a major transit stop as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21064.3; or ii. There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. b. If a parking space is not required, then the owner shall be required to disclose that
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
8 fact in any sales or rental agreement.
D.E. The city shall not require or deny an application based on any of the following:
1. The city shall not require dedications of rights -of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map.
2. The city shall not impose any subdivision standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than eight hundred square feet.
3. The city shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions as a condition for the lot split.
4. The city shall not deny an application solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that all building code safety standards are met, and they are sufficient to allow a separate conveyance.
E.F. An applicant for an urban lot split shall be required to sign an affidavit in a form approved by the city attorney to be recorded against the property stating the following:
1. That applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of approval. This requirement does not apply when the applicant is a "community land trust" or a "qualified nonprofit corporation" as the same are defined in the Revenue and Taxation Code.
2. That the uses shall be limited to residential uses.
3. That any rental of any unit created by the lot split shall be for a minimum of thirty-one days.
4. That the maximum number of units to be allowed on each parcel is two, including units otherwise allowed pursuant to density bonus provisions, accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, or units allowed pursuant to Chapter 18.122.
F.G. The city may deny the lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2), upon the public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
G.H. This section shall not apply to:
1. Any parcel which has been established pursuant to a lot split in accordance with this section; or
2. Any parcel where the owner of the parcel being subdivided or any person acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel in accordance with this section. For purposes of this section, "acting in concert" shall include, but not be limited to, where the owner of a property proposed for an urban lot split is the same, related to, or connected by partnership to the owner, buyer or seller (if transferred within the previous three years) of an adjacent lot.
SECTION 3. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the provisions of the authorizing statute, SB 9, as set forth in Government Code sections 65852.21 and 66411.7.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
9 SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance or any part thereof.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after adoption.
SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which time the same is pa ssed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published as required by law, in a publication of general circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 2025.
______________________________________
Mayor Tim Hepburn
_______________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance XXXX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE: August 18, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cody Howing, City Engineer
SUBJECT: LOS ANGELES METRO LONE HILL AVENUE TO WHITE AVENUE DOUBLE- TRACK PROJECT UPDATE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONCEPT DISCUSSION.
SUMMARY
Los Angeles Metro is nearing completion of the design phase for the Lone Hill Avenue to White Avenue Double-Track Project, which aims to improve track reliability and safety along the Metrolink rail corridor through City of La Verne. The project safety enhancements to these tracks, which are operated by Metrolink, will include quiet zone-ready infrastructure and affect six existing at-grade crossings in La Verne. The project design phase is projected to reach the 100% completion milestone in Fall 2025 and updates to the features of the San Dimas Canyon intersection work will be presented by Metro Staff.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council provide concurrence with the proposed design updates presented, including signalization of a U-Turn pocket on Arrow Highway that will be constructed as part of the regional transportation improvements.
DISCUSSION
The Metro Lone Hill Ave to White Avenue Double-Track Project has been an ongoing planning and design effort by Metro to enhance track reliability for the railroad track that is mostly located south of Arrow Highway as it passes through the City of La Verne. Metrolink operates the commuter rail within the subject rail corridor serving the San Gabriel Valley and beyond into San Bernardino County. The project is nearing the 100% design completion milestone status and continues to actively seek construction funding.
During the planning and design phase, Metro conducted community outreach events to ensure information was shared with the community and opportunities for feedback on the project details were created. Most recently, Metro staff conducted a community meeting focused on La Verne residents on March 20, 2024. Following that meeting, a Study Session was held on April 15, 2024 with the La Verne City Council. A notable feature of those presentations that occurred last year was the existing rail crossing located at San Dimas Canyon Road. The proposed changes at that location created a mandatory “free right-turn” condition for northbound traffic approaching the intersection at Arrow Highway. This change would require that all existing traffic that would otherwise proceed through the intersection in either a north or westbound direction be directed east onto Arrow Highway without stopping at the traffic signal.
Acknowledging that traffic may still want to continue in those prohibited directions following construction of the "free right-turn" movement, a U-Turn pocket was proposed to relieve that
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Los Angeles Metro Lone Hill Avenue to White Avenue Double-Track Project Update and Traffic Signal Concept Discussion., Page 2
traffic from having to travel to Wheeler Avenue to make such a movement. The resulting condition created by this proposed U-Turn was then further analyzed to determine if signalization of the movement was justified by a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, as dictated by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD). The findings of that study conducted by Metro’s design team identified that two signal warrants were met in the proposed conditions. For a traffic signal to be justified as a traffic control measure, at least one warrant must be met. However, should an intersection meet the conditions of a signal warrant, an agency is not obligated to signalize that intersection.
An examination of the number of vehicles that currently make the northbound and westbound movements from the south leg of San Dimas Canyon Road was conducted as part of the warrant analysis. That information was also compared with the conditions of Arrow Highway, which include arterial roadway level traffic volumes, a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour, and three westbound lanes approaching the proposed U-Turn Pocket location. To ensure an orderly movement of traffic and improve the safety of a U-Turn movement at this location, signalization is recommended.
Consideration of traffic flow and the impacts an additional signal may cause at this location were also considered. As part of the A-Line (Gold Line) light rail project, all the traffic signals along the Arrow Highway corridor were updated with interconnect technology. This proposed signal would be required to be integrated into the now existing system to support enhanced functionality of the signal on the corridor. The County of Los Angeles is also approaching the beginning of a Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Project, which encompasses Arrow Highway. That regional signal coordination project is scheduled for late 2025 to begin the construction bidding phase with construction estimated for completion in 2027. It’s anticipated that these existing and future features will support the efficient function of the signalized U-Turn and reduce delays to traffic that might otherwise be caused.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Metro will be responsible for all costs related to design, permitting, construction, etc. for the project. However, since the signal is not located within Metro right-of-way, once constructed and activated, the City would be responsible for ongoing operations and maintenance costs of the traffic signal. Signal operations and maintenance costs vary from location to location, and assessing a clear estimate on the cost of this location is difficult at this time. However, when constructed, this location is not expected to cost more than the typical signal that the City currently maintains.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Metro is the lead agency for the Lone Hill Avenue to White Avenue Double Track Project. The burden of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act for this project is on Metro as the lead agency. The proposed signalized U-Turn intersection will be a feature of the project scope should City Council concur with the proposed approach.
LEGAL REVIEW
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Los Angeles Metro Lone Hill Avenue to White Avenue Double-Track Project Update and Traffic Signal Concept Discussion., Page 3
1. Los Angeles Metro Project Presentation - Lone Hill Ave to White Ave Double-Track
Coordinated with:
Danny
Wu, Director of Public Works
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
LONE HILL AV TO WHITE AV DOUBLE-TRACK PROJECT
We’re building more railway tracks to reduce
travel time and enhance safety.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Agenda
2 I. Background
II. Last City Approved Project Features
III. Current Item for City Direction
IV. Next Steps
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Background - Project Location Map
3 • 3.9 miles of double track along San Bernardino Line (SBL) N
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Last City Approved Project Features – San Dimas Canyon
4 Modified
No Change
Right Turn for
Northbound
Four Quad Vehicular
Gates (CPUC 9, 9E)
Shortened Crosswalk
Across Arrow Hwy
Metrolink TracksPedestrian Gates
New
Pedestrian
Refuge Area
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
5 1,400 ft
Last City Approved Project Features – San Dimas Canyon
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Current Item for City Direction
6 Signalization of the Proposed U-Turn along Arrow Highway Plan View Concept – U-Turn for Eastbound Traffic on Arrow Hwy
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Current Item for City Direction
7 Signalization of the Proposed U-Turn along Arrow Highway • City Staff Requested a Warrant Analysis to Justify Need Recommendation: Intersection is warranted for a traffic signal. • LA County Arrow Hwy Corridor Study
Recommendation: The proposed traffic signal system will tie into the LA County synchronization. • Safety Concerns
Recommendation: Left turn lane bypass to use U-turn pocket with signalization for Arrow Highway.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
Next Steps
8 • Modify the design contract to incorporate any new scope of work items • Advance the final design documents to a draft 100% level by Fall 2025. • Continue seeking State and Federal Funding for Construction. • Report back to the Metro Board with a Project Status Update once the Draft 100% level for final design is achieved.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
9 Questions?
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
10 Thank you for joining us!
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE: August 18, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2025-2026.
SUMMARY
The City Council designates members to serve on City Council committees, regional boards and committees, and as liaisons to various City Committees, Commissions, and Boards, among other Community groups in order to continue to be informed and partake in local and regional issues. This action will designate current members to serve until the process is redone after the November 2026 election, unless performed earlier.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review the list of assignments and select members to represent the City Council on the designated committees.
DISCUSSION
Members of the City Council represent the City at various regional agencies, community groups, and act as liaisons to City Council-appointed resident advisory committees. As representatives to the regional agencies, a designated Council Member participates in the regional agency meetings, represents the City to the outside agency, and reports back to the City Council on the actions and activities of the regional agency.
With regard to City Council appointed committees, a designated Council Member will act as a liaison to the resident advisory committee, sub-committee or community group.
Through this process, it is requested that the City Council agree as to which Council Member will represent the City at the designated groups. Generally, these designations are made after the seating of a new City Council, will now be done in January after the November General Election in even years. With the new re-organization of the City's Commissions, Committees, and Boards, the item is being brought back at this time for Council consideration.
The City Council is requested to review each City Committee, City Council Sub-Committee, Regional Agency, or Community Group and designate either a Liaison or Delegate and an alternate if applicable. City staff sent the attached matrix to each member to solicit interest in each position using a scale of 1 to 5. The results, based on the feedback received, are in red. Some positions had multiple members interested in serving. Each assignment should be agreed to and once all assignments are made, the 2025-26 City Council Assignments should be moved, seconded, and then voted on.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments for 2025-2026., Page 2
FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no fiscal impact resulting from this recommended action.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
LEGAL REVIEW
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copy of 2025-26 City Council Assignments for Committees and Commissions
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
City Committees
Committee Liaison Alternate Staff Liaison Meeting details - When Stipend Backgound or Responsibilities 1 Infrastructure & Active Transportation
Committee
Meets at: City Hall Lau Hepburn(?) Wu Quarterly NONE
2 Finance Commission
Meets at: City Hall Johnson
Lau, Crosby, or
Hepburn(?) Lopez Quarterly NONE
3 Parks & Recreation Commission
Meets at: City Hall Lau
Johnson, Kash, or
Hepburn(?) Duran Quarterly NONE
4 Public Financing Authority (EIFD)
Meets at: UNKNOWN Johnson or Hepburn Johnson or Hepburn CM As needed NONE Meets to discuss bond issuance for EIFD projects. 5 Senior Advisory Committee
Meets at: Community Center
Rotation - All Council
Members None Duran
3rd Wednesday each month @
10:00 am NONE Meets to discuss senior citizen issues.
6 Youth & Family Action Committee (YFAC)
Meets at: City Hall Crosby Lau or Johnson Ranells 4th Tue @ 5:00 pm NONE Meets with interested citizens to develop positive
programs for youth.
City Council SubCommittees
Committee Delegate Alternate Staff Liaison Meeting details - When Stipend Backgound or Responsibilities 7 Economic Development Sub Committee
Meets at: City Hall Hepburn & Lau NONE Scherer As needed NONE Meets to discuss economic development with the City and OTLVBID and Chamber issues.
8 Legislative Committee
Meets at: Location TBD Kash & Crosby Hepburn None As needed NONE Meets with local, county, state and federal legislators as requested and needed.
Regional Agencies
Committee Delegate Alternate Staff Liaison Meeting details - When Stipend Backgound or Responsibilities 9 Calif Joint Powers Ins Authority
Meets at: 8081 Moody St,
La Palma, CA (800) 229-2343 Crosby Kash CM Annual meeting in July $100 Meets as needed to review insurance issues/policies and attends the annual meeting.
10 Fairplex Liaison Committee
Meets at: 1101 W. McKinley Ave, Pomona, CA
91768 (909) 623-3111 Lau or Kash Lau or Kash CM As needed NONE Meets to review Fairplex activities affecting La Verne and to plan Community Day at the Fair.
11 Foothill Transit Zone Liaison
Meets at: 100 S. Vincent Ave, Suite 200, West
Covina, CA (626) 967-3147 Crosby or Hepburn Crosby or Hepburn Ranells Meets quarterly, on a Friday at
7:30 am for breakfast then
meeting. $152
Meets with staff to discuss issues related to Foothill Transit services, Liaison also attends annual meeting as City's representative.
12 Gold Line Phase 2 Comm/Joint Powers Authority
Meets at: 406 Huntington Drive, Suite 202,
Monrovia, CA
Contact person: Chris Lowe Kash or Hepburn Kash or Hepburn CM 2nd Thursday of Month @
11:30 am
$100.00 (for attendee
only)
Meets to provide oversight of proposed light rail line
extension.
13 L.A. County City Selection Committee and MTA
City Selection Committee
Meets at: Location TBD Kash VACANT CM As needed NONE
L.A. County City Selection Committee is an ad hoc
committee that meets to select city rep for L.A. Co Div of the League of Calif Cities. MTA/City Selection Committee meets as needed for MTA Activities.
14 L.A. County Sanitation Dist 21 & 22
Meets at: 1955 Workman Mill Rd,
Whittier, CA 90601
(562) 908-4288 Hepburn or Kash Hepburn or Kash Wu 4th Wednesday of each month $125 per district Meets regarding special districts serving the water
pollution control and solid waste management needs of
each district under a joint administration.
15 League of California Cities - LA Division
Meets at: Location TBD Johnson VACANT CM 1st Thursday of each month NONE Meets to discuss Los Angeles County issues affecting cities. 16 Pomona Valley Transportation Authority (PVTA)
Meets at: City Hall Crosby Lau or Johnson Ranells
Every other month, usually the
2nd Wednesday @ 5:00 pm NONE
A joint powers authority, meets to discuss transportation issues.
CITY OF LA VERNE 2025 COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025
17 San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
(COG)
Meets at: 600 E. Huntington Drive, Monrovia Hepburn Johnson CM 3rd Thursday of each month $50 per meeting
(attendee only)
Meets to discuss issues of mutual concern affecting San Gabriel Valley cities.
18 So California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
Meets at: Locations TBD Johnson Hepburn ??? MONTHLY NONE Meets to discuss issues affecting Southern California cities. 19 Tri-City Mental Health Authority Liaison
Meets at: Tri-City Admin office, 1717 N. Indian
Hill Blvd, #B Claremont (909) 623-6131 Lau Johnson Duran 3rd Wednesday @ 5:00 pm NONE Meets to review mental health programs/activities for the cities of La Verne, Claremont and Pomona.
20 San Dimas/La Verne JPA (golf course)
Meets at: San Dimas Golf Course Crosby NONE Ranells/Duran Quarterly-Usually 7 am
breakfast meetings NONE
Meets to provide input to management and prioritize
capital outlay expenditures.
21 San Gabriel Valley Mosquito and Vector Control
District
Meets at: 1145 N. Azusa Canyon Road, West Covina Kash NONE CM Second Friday of each month at
7:00 am NONE
Meets to provide protection from vector-borne
diseases.
22 Public Financing Authority/EIFD Meets at: City Hall Hepburn & Crosby NONE CM Quarterly - 9 am NONE Meets to discuss bond issuance for EIFD projects.
Community Groups
Committee Delegate Alternate Staff Liaison Meeting details - When Stipend Backgound or Responsibilities 23 4th of July Committee
Meets at: City Hall Kash & Lau VACANT Peterson
Meets 4th Wednesday of each
mo (Feb thru July) or as needed NONE Plans and organizes the annual 4th of July festivities. 24 Bonita Educational Foundation
Meets at: Location TBD
(909) 971-8200 Hepburn & Crosby Kash NONE As needed NONE Committee meets to support student success by enriching and enhancing educational opportunities.
25 BUSD (Ad Hoc Committee)
Meets at: Location TBD
(909) 971-8200
Crosby or Hepburn or
Kash
Crosby or Hepburn or
Kash Duran Meets 2 times per year NONE
Committee meets with two representatives from the BUSD
to discuss issues of mutual concern.
26 Christmas Morning Kash NONE Duran As needed NONE Meets to discuss the annual Christmas Morning event 27 Cultural Awareness & Social Inclusion
Committee
Meets at: Hillcrest Community Hepburn & Lau VACANT CM Meets on the first Wednesday
of each month NONE
Meets to educate, inform, encourage, and build
awareness.
28 Mobile Home Park Liaison
Meets at: Can meet at Mobile Home Park if
needed. Residents will come into City Hall to
meet with Liaison also Hepburn & Crosby Johnson Ranells As needed NONE Meets with staff and citizens to discuss issues of mutual concern.
29 University of La Verne Liaison
Meets at: Location TBD Hepburn & Lau NONE CM As needed NONE Meets to discuss the development of community
recreational facilities on the vacant ULV property in south La Verne.
30 Youth Sports Working Group
Meets at: City Hall Hepburn & Johnson Lau Duran
1st Wednesday on odd
numbered months NONE
Meets to facilitate coordination and communication
between youth sports organizations, the City, and schools within the community.
Council Agenda Packet - August 18, 2025