Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 12 March 21, 2022
March 21, 2022
TRI-CITYCITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
Note: Written communications received from the public prior to the start of this meeting can be viewed at:
http://orindaca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=2210. They are also kept in the City Clerk’s Office as part of the public record and available upon request. 7:00 P.M. –SPECIAL SESSION – BY TELECONFERENCE
A. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL:
Mayor Fay called the Special Meeting to order at approximately 7:00 p.m.
ORINDA CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Dennis Fay, Vice Mayor Inga Miller, and Councilmembers:
Darlene Gee, Nick Kosla, Amy Worth
LAFAYETTE CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Teresa Gerringer, Vice Mayor Carl Anduri, and Councilmembers: Susan Candell, Gina Dawson, Wei-Tai Kwok MORAGA TOWN COUNCIL: Mayor Renata Sos, Vice Mayor Steve Woehleke, and Councilmembers: Sona Makker, Mike McCluer, Teresa Onoda B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Led by Moraga Mayor Sos.
C. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
MOTION by Vice Mayor Anduri and seconded by Mayor Gerringer to adopt the agenda. Said motion carried by unanimous (15-0) roll call vote.
D. PUBLIC FORUM
Supervisor Candace Andersen voiced her excitement to be present for the meeting and looks forward to listening to the presentation.
E. POLICY MATTERS
E.1. Presentation by John Hoang, Director of Planning at Contra Costa Transportation Authority on the Lamorinda Action Plan Update. Councilmember Discussion and Direction, if any
John Hoang, Director of Planning, CCTA, introduced Matt Kelly, CCTA’s Senior Transportation Planner and consultants David Early and Terina Wilson from PlaceWorks who are assisting CCTA on updating the Action Plans and Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP).
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 12 March 21, 2022
Mr. Hoang gave background of the item, described the meetings held with the Lamorinda Program Management Committee, the LPMC Technical Group and the LMPC Board, provided an update of current efforts relating to update of the Lamorinda Action Plan which was last amended June 2021, and looks forward to hearing from Councilmembers. He then introduced CCTA’s Senior Planner Matt Kelley who gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Matt Kelly, CCTA, Senior Transportation Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding their update of the Action Plans, the Countywide Transportation Plan. He gave a background of CCTA, the sales tax authority and congestion management agency for the County, stating the original transportation sales tax Measure C was passed in 1988 which was superseded by Measure J with an over 75% countywide in vote in 2004, implemented in 2009, and this is when they made some major changes to the Growth Management Program. (GMP). Measure J seeks to manage the impacts of land use decisions on the transportation system among other efforts and it requires compliance for all 19 local jurisdictions and the County through the submittal of a biannual checklist in order to receive 18% in return to source funds.
One of the major parts of the GMP is the voter-approved Urban Limit Line. It seeks to focus new residential and commercial development within urban growth boundaries, thus precluding the need to build on green fields and agricultural lands, and it reduces the need for new infrastructure to be extended beyond their current limits.
Another major part of the GMP are Actions Plans for Routes of Regional Significance. The plans seek to allow the RTPC’s or subareas to apply goals, objectives, and performance measures to routes deemed as major regional routes. The GMP seeks to ensure mitigation of negative impacts on new land use developments with objectives set for each route.
One of the main reasons LMPC was formed was to administer Lamorinda Fee and Finance Authority (LFFA) and this is where fees and taxes are collected from developers which then may be spent on local or regional improvements.
Due to changes in SB 43, this caused them to take a new look at Action Plans which will be discussed by the PlaceWorks team as to what they have been doing.
David Early, PlaceWorks, described each of the following successes of the Action Plans in the past and said he will be talking about what updates will entail:
• Caldecott Tunnel 4th Bore
• Moraga Way multimodal improvements
• Lamorinda School Bus Program
• Transportation for Livable Communities Project Grants • Livable Moraga Way
• Canyon Road Bridge Improvements
• Countywide: GoMentum Autonomous Vehicle Testing Facility • Countywide: Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements • Countywide: Charge Up Contra Costa
• Countywide: BART Parking and Access Improvements
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 12 March 21, 2022
The project is an update of all 5 Action Plans, Lamorinda being one of them. There is a second update in SWAT and those in East, Central and West County. Once that is over, they will be beginning on an update as well to the Countywide Transportation Plan which will roll up the results of the Action Plans into a single Countywide Plan.
Both of these efforts will contain bold ideas to enhance Contra Costa’s transportation network with emphasis on reducing vehicle miles traveled, on multi-modal transportation and key over-arching issues that include equity and transportation, safety and transportation, and addressing climate change as it will affect the transportation network.
Efforts will also build on three concepts that came forward in the 2020 Transportation Expenditure Plan:
the high use of innovation and new technology, a holistic multi-modal approach and an integrated approach to corridor management.
The Action Plan will:
• Address transportation issues of today
• Establish quantitative service objectives
• Identify Regional Routes
• Provide Growth Management Program compliance metrics
• Expand MTSOs to become Regional Transportation Objectives (RTOs) for:
Roadway Safety
Transit Climate Change
Bike/PedestrianEquity
Technology
Mr. Early said they are working with the three City staff and held four workshops to establish regional transportation objectives in all 7 areas and to identify important regional facilities. He then presented a slide on the project schedule milestones and dates, noting that they will be wrapping up and presenting the Action Plans in October with an interim check-in in June, and then moving into the Countywide Transportation Plan update starting in July with preparation and adoption by the end of 2023.
Mr. Early then described how the Action Plans might mesh with local growth policies, and with the Housing and Safety Element updates underway which are required by law. • Action Plans and CTP will account for growth foreseen in Housing Elements (as assigned by ABAG). • Action Plans and CTP have a horizon of 2050, while Housing Elements are only for 8 years so total development numbers are different.
• Lack of roadway capacity will no longer be a viable reason to disapprove of residential growth projects foreseen in a Housing Element.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 12 March 21, 2022
He then presented graphs and said they are identifying additionally important potential roadway routes, potential transit routes, and potential bike/pedestrian routes. All routes that may be put into the Action Plans do not become a subject of that compliance effort. He emphasized that cities do need to be in compliance with the GMP to receive return to source funds. It may be cities set an objective for one of these facilities and may not be able to comply with that due to growth beyond their control, but that does not put cities out of compliance with an Action Plan.
What planning for routes does is allow them to do is to make commitments from one jurisdiction to the other about an effort for regional planning. He congratulated all cities for the fact that the County has a framework for regional planning that does not exist almost anywhere else in the entire State of California.
Regarding next steps:
• Policy Board and TACs help promote public outreach
• Future TAC and Policy Board Meetings:
February 2022 – TAC Round 3:
Introduce the new preliminary goals, projects, programs, RTOs, and Regional Routes for comment and refinement
Late March/April 2022 – TAC Round 4:
Review 2050 RTO projections and implications for travel in 2050 with recommended projects and programs for comment and refinement
June – October 2022
Policy Board review of Action Plan components
TAC Review of Draft Action Plan
TAC Review of Final Action Plan
Policy Board Adoption
Regarding public outreach:
• Project webpage: ccta.net/ctp
• Countywide Public Polling
• 11 Public Workshops and 21 Pop-Ups
o Two rounds of five separate workshops (one for each planning area). o One extra workshop for Lamorinda area.
• 3 Stakeholder Workshops
• Oversight Committee
• Jurisdiction and Outside Agency Coordination
• Lamorinda Round 1 Outreach:
o Lafayette BART Pop-Up 3/8 from 4 to 6 PM
o Orinda farmers Market 3/12 from 9 to 1 PM
He concluded the presentation and thanked the Councils and said the team is available to answer questions regarding the overall process.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 12 March 21, 2022
Councilmember Candell asked and confirmed with Mr. Early that the public meetings were focused on two-way interactions to educate people about the Action Plan process, what they are, why they are important, why the work of CCTA is so important and how sales tax dollars are being put to work.
He said at the same time, they are asking people for their comments about what they believe are the most important initiatives that can be undertaken for transportation over the next 25 years. In some cases, they are hearing specific comments about road repairs, traffic signals, bikeways, and in other cases, comments are broad about people wanting to see more autonomous vehicles, more ride-sharing, an overall better bikeway network, expansion of transit, etc. They have structured exercises at the workshops and also online on the website for members of the public to provide feedback.
Councilmember Candell asked if they will have another round in the process, and Mr. Early said they will have two more rounds with both popups and interactive workshops. Lamorinda residents wanted additional opportunities for input and they are doing three rounds of workshops in Lamorinda.
Councilmember McCluer said he thought the presentation would cover an update on the Lamorinda Action Plans and where they stand on each one. Mr. Early noted this is not on the agenda this evening and explained CCTA does do a biannual assessment of compliance with the objectives and some of that information is available and some is being compiled by the consultant team now. Hopefully, the information will be made available to the TAC at the April meeting.
Their work is not only to assess where you are today in achieving the existing objectives but also helping to set new objectives that are realistic and those assumed to be achieved over the next 10-25 year planning horizon.
Mr. Kelly stated the way they track current objectives is through the checklist reporting of each town every two years and they report back to CCTA about what they have done in terms of implementing the actions in their Action Plan. However, they can always get a city or town that information.
With the pandemic and fewer people using the roadways, roads have been operating relatively well with high compliance with existing objectives. Existing objectives are almost exclusively oriented towards roadways. There is one objective about seating capacity on BART and there are many seats available here.
They were not completely in compliance before the pandemic and will be working on new objectives for assessing transit, bike and pedestrians moving forward.
Vice Mayor Miller stated as projects are approved she asked if there will be programs that compliant communities can apply for to seek funding for roadway enhancements such as Moraga Way, St. Mary’s Road, Moraga Way and Acalanes/Glorietta as an example. If they are adding car trips to those areas and adding population, she wondered if it is appropriate to use this current plan and if so, how they go about that to address multi-jurisdictional issues they will be facing together as part of the housing cycle.
Mr. Early agreed that questions of how to design roadways to have regional connections is fundamental to this process and future planning. It is the case that there are parts of these roadways where it may be possible to add facilities. Some might move additional cars, some might enhance bike safety, and there are other places like Moraga Way where the right-of-way is so constrained it is not possible to make many changes. This may be a planning to get people out of their cars and enhance transit service. Perhaps there is also a way for carpool, Lyft and Uber use so multiple people can share rides in one vehicle.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 12 March 21, 2022
There is funding through CCTA and MTC over the next years to make additional improvements. The big question will be to achieve consensus in Lamorinda about what those improvements might look like and collaboration will be needed.
Vice Mayor Woehleke asked how this interfaces with the Plan Bay Area 2050 which is broad in scope and has a projected price of +$850 billion.
Mr. Kelly said Plan Bay Area is, to some degree, a parallel or similar effort to the Countywide Transportation Plan being conducted for the entire 9 county Bay Area. It has just recently been adopted by the MTC Board and ABAG Board as the blueprint for growth for the Bay Area through 2050, contains a host of programs and in a way cities can think about the Action Plan and the CTP as steps towards implementing Plan Bay Area 2050.
Growth projections were taken from Plan Bay Area 2050 growth projections, retooled by all staff members to ensure they are up-to-date and now are using those refined 2050 projections for the new transportation planning they are doing now for the Action Plans and the CTP. Those things will be rolled up and resubmitted to MTC 3-5 years from now for the next Regional Transportation Plan which will roll up all of these CTPs.
Vice Mayor Woehleke asked if there are funding opportunities from the $850 billion or is this an unknown.
Mr. Kelly said to a fair degree, it is an unknown. Either 8 or 9 counties are sales tax counties to make transportation improvements. Those monies sunset at various times and it will be important to consider whether those measures should be renewed. It was thought there might be a regional measure for all 9 counties or a subset, and he then described other funding sources available from the State surplus, SB 1, SB 2, federal government and the Biden Administration for infrastructure and housing improvements.
However, these do not amount to $850 billion so it will be important to continue to look at additional funding sources the region can agree on.
Mr. Hoang added that CCTA worked with MTC on their project list for consideration and also programmatic projects which include bike and pedestrian projects, etc. so all projects identified in the Action Plans and the CTP all get uploaded to MTC.
Councilmember Makker asked what tools CCTA have for transportation regarding fire. Mr. Hoang said in their forecasting they focus on the transportation aspect but realizing climate change and fire is important to this region. He thinks they can incorporate evacuation scenarios as far as roadways are concerned, using models relating to fire which can be determined and further studied.
Mr. Kelly commented that they do not per se have a countywide plan for evacuation from the transportation side but that is the conversation they are having at the TAC level with staffs. They are hearing in Lamorinda so they are trying to find a way to fit that into the action planning process. It is about what each city’s vision and what they can incorporate into the plans.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 12 March 21, 2022
Mr. Early noted that PlaceWorks is beginning work on a project for the City of Orinda to try and quantify evacuation capacity through GIS analysis of the individual roadways. While it is specific to Orinda and this may be a model project other cities might want to look at and see if they could implement something similar or whether this is an effort CCTA might take on over the next several years to look at subregionwide or countywide.
Mayor Sos asked and confirmed that one of the threshold tasks here is for the three jurisdictions in the Lamorinda Action Plan to agree on routes of regional significance.
Mr. Early noted they are still working at the staff and consultant level to understand exactly how those will be defined. He referred to the three maps and said there has been some discussion of trying to merge those into corridors, as there are 5-6 transportation facilities in the one corridor that serve a variety of modes. They are looking at these one mode at a time and may actually merge the maps together into a single map of key corridors within the subregion. So coming to consensus on what those corridors are is going to be an important aspect of this process.
Mayor Sos said Mr. Early had stated earlier that if something is designated as a route of regional significance, it does not commit that route to being widened, does not commit it to be subject to particular metrics or performance expectations. Rather, it is up to the three jurisdictions to define what the parameters are and what the metrics might be and that there is no risk to any of them of non-compliance just because they have a route of regional significance going through their jurisdiction.
Mr. Early confirmed this is correct. He underscored that the non-risk is two-fold; 1) you as a region will agree on the objectives for those facilities and no one is going to impose them on you; and 2) beyond that, non-achievement of an objective is not one of the things that would make you non-compliant from the growth management perspective. CCTA wants to encourage cities to set robust objectives but does not want to penalize cities for non-attainment of the objectives.
Mayor Sos asked and confirmed that the potential benefits, in addition to the commitment of the three jurisdictions to coordinate, also includes potential funding advantages to have a route of regional significance, which he described.
Councilmember Worth cited the substantial changes in terms of housing development projects being required to pay for relative to traffic improvements and said it would be helpful if CCTA could provide additional information on what are the requirements of a route of regional significance versus intrajurisdictional routes.
She was trying also to understand the impact of funding, given she did not recall seeing routes of regional significance identified in the OBAG programs and other regional criteria identified for the future. Most are active transportation programs and they typically do not see monies for single occupancy vehicle widening, which is included in their Action Plan as one of the goals.
Mr. Early said the concept of a route of regional significance at all is unique to Contra Costas County, so it is true they will not find in MTC’s guidance the designation as a reason that MTC would fund a project. If a city writes a grant application, it can explain a route of regional significance and what that means locally and why it is important, and it does provide an extra boost.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 12 March 21, 2022
Another term mentioned was that the Lamorinda Action Plan is the only action plan among five but of those five, the Lamorinda plan is the only one that has an intra-regional route of significance which is different from a regional route of significance. This is applied in particular to Moraga Way and Moraga Road and does not exist elsewhere.
He was not in the process when this was done earlier and Councilmember Worth most likely was, but one of his goals has been to streamline these five documents to bring them more into compliance with each other to make it possible to cross reference them and simplify them. From his reading, it does not seem clear what the differences are from being an intra-regional route or a regional route. It is the case Moraga Way and Moraga Road do cross jurisdictional boundaries and in that sense meet the definition of a route of regional significance as they are the only two ways in and out for those living in Moraga. In that sense, they are important to designate as routes of regional significance, and he has not come to understand what difference it makes to call them by a different sub-designation.
So, it has been his advice they should have one classification instead of several or two and that as Mayor Sos said, this does not create any punitive measures but just an opportunity for inter-regional cooperation so moving away from having two classes to just having one class would be more streamlined.
Mr. Kelly added that there is a push from the CCTA side to get Lamorinda to add more routes of regional significance, namely the Moraga Roads and Moraga Ways, and there was resistance at the staff level around 2014. They came to an agreement that they would include these routes in the action plan but they would not have the full significance of a route of regional significance and would not be subject to the land use development review that the full routes have. When they were talking about doing the plans again they just thought it did not make sense to include routes that did not fit into the countywide framework.
He also noted that in their local OBAG guidelines, they do include routes of regional significance so when CCTA is providing funds they bring in that route of regional significance as criteria, but he agreed, it is not at the regional level.
Mr. Early added that the current signal technology project is being focused at least on the routes of regional significance, so designating Moraga Way and Moraga Road as routes of regional significance will qualify them for the signal interconnection project which should make traffic flow much more smoothly through all three communities and may not be available if those remain outside the realm of the full routes of regional significance.
Mr. Hoang said going forward, they are right at the thick of trying to transition away from routes of regional significance to corridors and are trying to come up with a systematic way to explain that.
Ironically, back in 1995 it was corridor at one point.
Councilmember Worth said she thinks the idea of corridors make sense because they look at multi-modal corridors, which she described.
Mayor Fay cited the changes in travel behaviors from the pandemic as well as behaviors from the last 30 years. He asked if CCTA has some way of dealing with that as part of the Action Plans and the overall County Transportation Plan.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 12 March 21, 2022
Mr. Early said at this point everyone who works in planning are at a critical juncture to figure out what is the post-pandemic future will look at. He has colleagues that say things will go back in time the way they were and within 2-5 years they will see just as many people commuting as they used to, and there are other colleagues who thinks this has been a permanent change and 30% to 50% of workers will continue to work at home. He does not know, thinks his sense is planners need to plan for a variety of outcomes where a worst case outcome is that trips go back to where they were or even expanding incrementally, so they will have to wait and see.
Mr. Kelly said CCTA is trying to figure that out to an extent of what people will do in the future. They have begun a travel behavior survey around the county starting with the I-680 corridor and spoke to thousands of people and found out their current behavior, what they think their future travel behavior will be, when they would get on a train, what would get them on a bike, etc. They have done two surveys in two different corridors and plan on getting the Hwy 4 and Hwy 24 corridors done in the next several months.
A majority of people agreed to provide on-going feedback into the future so as to track what people are doing a year or two from now.
Mr. Hoang added that possibly what they can do is alternative forecasts and see what the differences are.
Mayor Gerringer asked and confirmed with Mr. Early that it has not been the practice in the past for City Councils to formally vote on the Action Plans; that it is presumed that representatives from each city and county who sit on the LPMC Policy Board and ultimately on the SWAT Board are representing their agencies.
Mayor Gerringer said a couple of communities are also working on local Road Safety Plans and Lafayette has committed to Vision Zero. She asked if staff is providing that input or what should Councilmembers know moving forward on this.
Mr. Early that staff has made them aware of the Road Safety Plans and the Vision Zero planning. One of the issues for which they are setting objectives is safety and they are trying to dovetail with the plans and Vision Zero plan so those outcomes will be reflected in the Action Plans and the CTP as well.
Mr. Hoang said different cities are at different points with their road safety plans and Lafayette’s is in a good position to be incorporated into the Action Plans.
Councilmember Worth said she knows all three communities are concerned about bike/pedestrian safety and she asked and confirmed that whatever progress made with the traffic safety plans will be included in the Action Plans.
Councilmember Worth commented that the City has a committee called Bay Area Collaborative and they are working on their draft Joint Work Plan with MTC, BAAQMD, ABAG and BCDC. What originally began as sea level rise has now evolved into multi-risk strategies which includes things like fire risk. Her sense is there are more conversations about all impacts to communities, transportation, etc.
Councilmember McCleur asked and confirmed with Mr. Early that they would like to hear from Lamorinda over the next one to two months regarding its new Action Plan with new ideas, projects and improvements.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 12 March 21, 2022
Councilmember Makker asked what is the source of data and questioned if there are new sources that can inform this.
Mr. Early said much of the data they are currently using old school data, traffic counts, the traffic model that has existed for some years which help them to know pre-pandemic levels of traffic volumes as measured, putting those into a model and ensuring the model can replicate existing patterns.
Then, they look at changes of land use and model future patterns, and this is a model up to date that uses the most recent modeling technology, and it then gives projections of the levels of service that would exist for vehicles on facilities throughout the sub-region. Additionally, they are looking at safety information such as collisions and hot spots and also looking at VMT and from the model are able to calculate how many trips are being made, their length per person within each region.
They augment some of that with ‘big data’ from cell phones and this gets inputted into the data to ground proof it. They are also using census data to analyze how equity issues are coming forward, trying to understand racial makeup and economic makeup of various census tracts and understand how commute trips differ from one to another, commute patterns of higher income versus lower income individuals, modeling transit usage and ridership on transit, mode share on transit bikes, etc. They will be bringing that altogether over the next month or two and then using that to set goals for how they might see positive change.
Councilmember Dawson asked if cities will have access to that data as they do their land use planning.
Mr. Kelly said it is a lot of output that they try to summarize in the plans themselves, but they could provide access to the raw or summarized data to staff.
Mr. Kelly added that when a traffic consultant does an analysis of an individual project, that consultant uses the same model they are using for this effort, so the data sits in the model.
Mayor Fay opened the Public Forum.
Sora O’Doherty, Lamorinda Weekly, said she is listening to getting people out of their cars, onto bicycles, public transit, and in the event of evacuation from a wildfire she asked if people will use their bicycles or carpool, or do they need to have capacity for everyone to get out of these areas in the event of a fire.
Mr. Early said most people will evacuate the area in an emergency in a car. It will be a very different circumstance than normal trip making and most roadways will be managed to move in one direction only.
They will also presumably have multiple people in one vehicle and have people wanting to cooperate, with public safety managing traffic.
Vice Mayor Woehleke noted a correction of his previous comments, stating that the Plan Bay Area 2050 is actually $580 billion and not $850 billion. In reviewing the Action Plan for Lamorinda, he is trying to understand what is in scope. He draws that regional planning is being done as part of this effort, then manage Measure J funding, as well as advocacy and facilitation related to traffic issues. He posed as a suggestion that in the updated plan, they might consider having a succinct description of what is in scope and what is out of scope. As he read it, it is hard for him to see where it ends. It covers a broad area and it may help readers if this could be further defined.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 12 March 21, 2022
Mayor Sos thanked the team for the presentation, acknowledged the incredible amount of work of respective jurisdictions, CCTA and consultants have put into this and get ting public input, and Councilmembers echoed these sentiments.
Mayor Fay concluded the item, thanked representatives for the presentation, Councilmember questions, and for providing clarity.
E.2 Possible Items for Future Joint Meeting
Mayor Fay stated wildfire risk is very high on the Orinda priority list and has recently been added for Lafayette, so he assumes this will be a candidate topic for a future meeting.
Councilmember Kwok wondered if there is an interest in looking at drought resilience in terms of potentially bringing recycled and reclaimed water to communities from Central Sanitary District.
Mayor Fay said he would say another closely related issue is climate change which is driving wildfire problems.
Councilmember Gee suggested an item that gets a lot of public commentary through social media and rises to levels of concern is crime and policing services and neighborhood activities to deter crime and further public safety.
Councilmember Dawson said in terms of wildfire preparations, how they can look at the overlap of evacuation routes and making this clear as they impact all three communities.
Vice Mayor Woehleke commented that they should not wait for the next joint meeting. He knows police departments are responsible for that and is confident that Moraga might have input on that.
Moraga Police Chief Jon King noted that later this week is a meeting of all involved public safety agencies in Lamorinda specifically to address this issue. Also, Contra Costa County is just completing adoption of the Zone Haven Evacuation Zones through a grant which was coordinated by MOFD. So, they are well on the way and this is a meeting they hold at the beginning of every fire season.
They are also working on a reissue of the Residential Guide for evacuation and emergencies. They have a meeting about that tomorrow and they are hoping to have that out in June with some revisions. Lastly, they will be doing a couple of evacuation drills virtually and getting residents acclimated to what they need to do.
Tri-City City Council
Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 12 March 21, 2022
F. ADJOURNMENT – 8:46p.m.
APPROVED:
______________________________________
Teresa Gerringer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Joanne Robbins, City Clerk