Agenda packet, study session — Laguna Beach City Council, May 26, 2026

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING
COMMISSION/DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
MAY 26, 2026
COUNCIL CHAMBERS – 505 FOREST AVENUE, LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 MARK ORGILL, Mayor Steven Kellenberg, PC Chair Imer Bauta, DRB Chair HALLIE JONES, Mayor Pro Tem Steven Goldman, PC Chair Pro Tem Debbie Neev, DRB Chair Pro Tem SUE KEMPF, Councilmember Jorg Dubin, Commissioner Mary Jo "MJ" Coveny, DRB member ALEX ROUNAGHI, Councilmember Ken Sadler, Commissioner Tom Gibbs, DRB member BOB WHALEN, Councilmember Susan McLintock Whitin, Commissioner Louis Weil, DRB member DAVE KIFF, City Manager
MEGAN GARIBALDI, City Attorney
LAURA PARISI, City Treasurer
ANN MARIE McKAY, City Clerk
LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the City Council is required to disclose on the record any campaign contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 commencing on January 1, 2025, made by the party or the party’s agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure should be made when the agenda item is called and must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution, the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Council Members are also required to make such disclosures and recuse themselves.

Public Participation: You may submit comments in person on any agenda item or any item not on the agenda. You may also submit written comments on any agenda item or on any item not on the agenda via mail to the City Clerk at 505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA. 92651 or by email to [email protected]. In order to allow sufficient time for members of the City Council and staff to review and consider your written comments, written comments will be accepted for consideration up until the close of business (i.e., 5:30 p.m.) on the business day before the date on which this public meeting is scheduled. Written comments WILL NOT be read aloud during the City Council Meeting. Please note that written comments are posted on the City’s website, so do not include any personal information you do not want posted on the web. Any comments received after the deadline for submittal may not become part of the public record for that meeting. For comments submitted on a topic not on the agenda, please indicate that you would like your comments included in the official record for this meeting.

Courtesy Virtual Broadcast: Please take notice that the City also plans to broadcast the meeting via the below listed mediums. These virtual broadcast mediums are also provided as a courtesy only and are not guaranteed to be technically feasible or uninterrupted. Thus, in order to guarantee livetime viewing, members of the public are encouraged to attend in person.

1. Online on the City of Laguna website: www.lagunabeachcity.net/meetings

2. Cox cable channel 852

3. Online on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQsj8cEM7IvTH6p4uf3NUzQ JOINT CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION / DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STUDY SESSION ************************************************
A. ROLL CALL 3:00 p.m.

B. STUDY SESSION.

1. JOINT STUDY SESSION OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

PROJECTS
1 of 129

B. STUDY SESSION.

1. JOINT STUDY SESSION OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

PROJECTS
Recommendations: Receive a presentation and recommendations from City consultant JKA regarding the first public review draft of the proposed “phase two” single and twofamily residential objective design standards, receive public input, and provide direction as appropriate.

C. ADJOURNMENT. The Laguna Beach City Council will adjourn to its 5:00 p.m. regular meeting.

ADA ACCOMMODATIONS
*************************
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons with a disability who require a disabilityrelated modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, may request such modification or accommodation from the City Clerk at (949) 4970705 (telephone) or (949) 4970771 (facsimile). Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to the meeting.

COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.5
********************************************************* Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office at 505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, California, during normal business hours. 2 of 129

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date:

May 26, 2026

STUDY SESSION
1 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY SESSION TO CONSIDER OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS

FOR SINGLE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board:

1. Receive a presentation and recommendations from City consultant JKA regarding the first public review draft of the proposed “phase two” single- and two-family residential objective design standards, receive public input, and provide direction as appropriate.

SUMMARY OF THE MATTER
The City is continuing preparation of Objective Design Standards (“ODS”) for single- and two-family residential development as part of the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (“CZCU”). The ODS program is intended to establish clear, objective, and legally defensible design standards that comply with recent State housing laws while maintaining Laguna Beach’s unique architectural character and neighborhood compatibility.

The ODS program is being developed in two phases. Phase One focuses on objective form and massing standards, including height and setback requirements, and is incorporated into the Design Review Efficiency Ordinance, which was last reviewed by the City Council on May 12, 2026. Phase Two expands upon the basic form and massing standards to include objective architectural character and style standards for single- and two-family residential development. This phased approach was developed in the community interest to hasten the implementation of ODS in response to State housing laws that preempt the City’s ability to impose subjective design criteria on certain qualifying housing projects.

This Joint Study Session is intended to provide the City Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board with an update on the Phase Two ODS effort and obtain feedback on the evolving draft standards and document framework. Since the prior study session1, JKA prepared the first public review draft of the Phase Two ODS document, including preliminary architectural style standards, illustrative examples, and organizational concepts. (Attachment 1.) Additional efforts will continue through 2026, with two public hearings anticipated in summer 2026 prior to final adoption of the Phase Two ODS.

DISCUSSION
Comprehensive Zoning Code Update
On October 8, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to De Novo Planning Group for preparation of the CZCU, a key initiative identified through the City’s 2022 Strategic Planning and Goal Setting Workshop and reaffirmed during the 2024 Annual Planning Workshop. On July 22, 2025, the City Council approved a contract amendment expanding the scope of work to prioritize preparation of Objective Design Standards (“ODS”) for single- and two-family residential projects, as well as updated parking standards. De Novo 1 November 19, 2025 Planning Commission and Design Review Board Joint Study Session (Development of objective design standards for single- and two-family residential projects.) 1 of 127
JOINT STUDY SESSION - OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE- AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS May 26, 2026

Page 2 of 5 ends

Planning Group subcontracted with JKA to develop the ODS for single- and two-family residential projects and Kittelson for updated parking standards.

Since initiation of the project, De Novo Planning Group and its subcontractors, JKA and Kittelson, have undertaken a range of project activities including staff coordination meetings, background research, site visits, parking occupancy data collection, preparation of outreach materials, development of project branding, and coordination with the CZCU Ad Hoc Committee (the “Ad Hoc Committee”), consisting of Mayor Orgill and Councilmember Whalen.

Need for Objective Design Standards
In recent years, the State of California has enacted legislation intended to increase housing production and reduce barriers to residential development. These laws limit the ability of local agencies to rely upon subjective design criteria when reviewing qualifying housing projects and instead require the use of objective design standards that are uniformly verifiable and measurable.

Objective design standards are defined by California Government Code Section 65913.4 as standards that “involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.” Because portions of the City’s existing design review framework rely on subjective findings, the City is developing ODS to preserve local design oversight while ensuring compliance with State law. The standards are intended to maintain compatibility with Laguna Beach’s established architectural character and neighborhood context while creating a clear and legally defensible review process for future residential development.

Without adoption of objective standards, the City’s ability to influence the design and compatibility of future residential projects may be substantially limited under State housing law.

Prior Consideration
On November 19, 2025, the Planning Commission and Design Review Board held a Joint Study Session to receive a presentation from JKA on their existing conditions report and preliminary recommendations for the architectural styles that would be included in the Phase Two ODS. (The November 19, 2025 Staff Report, JKA Existing Conditions Report, and Minutes are attached as Attachments 2-4, respectively.) On April 21, 2026, City staff and the consultant team met with a small group of local design professionals and the Ad Hoc Committee to review JKA’s administrative draft of the Phase Two ODS and gather early feedback regarding the proposed standards and document organization. The meeting was an important milestone in the process and helped identify potential refinements to improve clarity, usability, visual presentation, and overall effectiveness of the standards prior to preparation of the first public review draft.

The public review draft attached to this report includes graphics, architectural illustrations, visual examples, and publication-ready formatting intended to make the document more user-friendly and accessible for applicants, property owners, City staff, decision-makers, and the general public. 2 of 127
JOINT STUDY SESSION - OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE- AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS May 26, 2026

Page 3 of 5 ends

Two-Phase Approach to Objective Design Standards
The ODS program is being prepared in two phases:

Phase One focuses on objective form and massing standards, including building height, setbacks, and envelope requirements utilizing a “box inside a box” approach3. As currently proposed, projects utilizing these streamlined standards without discretionary design review would be limited to single-story structures not exceeding 15 feet in height and subject to increased setbacks beyond the minimum requirements of the underlying zoning district. Phase One does not address architectural styles or detailed design elements and is intended to facilitate timely implementation of foundational objective standards.

Phase Two expands the ODS program to address architectural character and style standards for single- and two-family residential development. The standards are intended to be highly illustrated, user-friendly, and supported by form-group architectural style guidance and visual examples. They include standards related to architectural detailing to ensure housing projects make positive contributions to the aesthetics of a neighborhood4 and massing design standards to avoid box-like forms and promote 360-degree design5.

They also include objective standards related to entryways and lighting to prioritize the orientation of buildings toward public streets and promote safety through exterior lighting while minimizing the potential for light and glare impacts.

Purpose of the Joint Study Session
The purpose of this Joint Study Session with the City Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board is to discuss the first public review draft of the Phase Two ODS for single- and two-family residential development. JKA will present a project update including a summary of prior outreach and how that outreach informed the development of the Phase Two ODS, and provide an overview of the first public review draft of the ODS document. A copy of the public review draft is also attached to this staff report for review prior to the Joint Study Session. (Attachment 1.) Staff respectfully requests that all meeting attendees, including community members with an interest in this project, prepare for the discussion by reviewing the document prior to the meeting. The Joint Study Session is intended to obtain additional feedback and direction from the City Council, Planning Commission, Design Review Board, and community prior to preparing the final ODS document for potential adoption.

NEXT STEPS
Based on feedback received during this Joint Study Session, JKA will continue refining the Phase Two ODS and prepare a final ODS document for formal consideration and adoption. Two public hearings are 3 The “box inside a box” concept will provide objective design standards that allow a certain form of development. Still, an applicant will have the option to pursue discretionary design review should the applicant want to exceed such allowed form of development. The Phase One ODS have now been drafted and presented to the City Council for a first reading of the Design Review Efficiency Ordinance and Efficiency Ordinance on May 12, 2026. The ordinance was continued to May 26, 2026, for a first reading, in order to allow staff sufficient time to contact certain neighborhood associations regarding the zone-specific design criteria applicable to Three Arch Bay, Residential/Hillside Protection, South Laguna Village Commercial, etc. 4 For example, requirements for the design of window muntins, mullions, and sticking to frame and divide panes of glass. 5 For example, straight and continuous building walls cannot exceed a 30-foot length without a horizontal offset. 3 of 127
JOINT STUDY SESSION - OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE- AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS May 26, 2026

Page 4 of 5 ends

anticipated in summer 2026 to present the proposed ODS, receive public testimony, and consider final adoption of the standards.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The recommended action has no financial impact to the budget.

ALIGNMENT WITH CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES
The development of the ODS is consistent with the City Council’s strategic goals and priorities related to implementation of the CZCU, preservation of neighborhood character, and compliance with evolving State housing laws. The project supports the City Council’s direction to modernize the City’s development regulations while maintaining Laguna Beach’s distinct architectural identity and community character.

The ODS effort also advances the City Council priorities related to improving government efficiency, providing clear and predictable development standards, increasing transparency in the development review process, and ensuring the City maintains local design oversight through objective and legally defensible regulations. The ongoing public outreach process, including meetings with the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, design professionals, and the Ad Hoc Committee, further supports the City Council’s commitment to inclusive public engagement and thoughtful long-range planning.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The recommended action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act under CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 because it consists of basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. The recommended action is strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded. Here, the recommended action meets the exemption because the City Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board are providing direction on research, analysis, and preliminary recommendations related to the development of single- and two-family residential ODS, which are informational and planning activities that will not result in any physical changes to the environment.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Single- and Two- Family Objective Design Standards (First Public Review Draft) (Pgs. 6-72)

2. November 19, 2025 PC and DRB Joint Study Session Staff Report (Pgs. 73-76)

3. November 19, 2025 Existing Conditions Report (Pgs. 77-120)

4. November 19, 2025 PC and DRB Joint Study Session Minutes (Pgs. 121-125) Submitted By: Matthew Schneider Approved: .David A Kiff Matthew Schneider, Director of
Community Development
Dave Kiff, City Manager
4 of 127
JOINT STUDY SESSION - OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE- AND TWOFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS May 26, 2026

Page 5 of 5 ends

Report Prepared By: Coordinated With:

Wendy Jung, Principal Planner Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney Anthony Viera, Deputy Director of Community
Development
5 of 127

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
City of Laguna Beach

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
May 2026
Design
Standards
Attachment 1
6 6 of 127

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
City Council
Mark Orgill, Mayor
Hallie Jones, Mayor Pro Tem
Alex Rounaghi
Bob Whalen
Sue Kempf
Planning Commission
Steven Kellenberg, Chair
Steven Goldman, Chair Pro Tem
Jorg Dubin
Ken Sadler
Susan McLintock Whitin
Design Review Board
Imer Bauta, Chair
Debbie Neev, Chair Pro Tem
Tom Gibbs
Louis Weil
Mary Jo "MJ" Coveny
City Staff
Matthew Schneider, Community Development Director
Anthony Viera, Deputy Community Development Director
Wendy Jung, Principal Planner

CONSULTANT TEAM
John Kaliski Architects (JKA)
for
De Novo Planning Group
DRAFT 5/15/26
7 7 of 127

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION4

1.1 Intent and Purpose5

1.2 Applicability and Approval Process6

1.3 Document User Guide8

1.4 Form Group Style Guide9

1.5 Typical Document Checklist/Layout 13

1.6 Key Terms 14
GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS 22
GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS 23

2.1 Site 23

2.2 Massing 25
FORM GROUP STANDARDS 26
FORM GROUP A STANDARDS 27
3A.1 Roofs 27
3A.2 Walls 29
3A.3 Exterior Openings 30
3A.4 Entry Elements 32
3A.5 Building Elements and Details 34
3A.6 Building Colors 36
FORM GROUP B STANDARDS 37
3B.1 Roofs 37
3B.2 Walls 38
3B.3 Exterior Openings 39
3B.4 Entry Elements 41
3B.5 Building Elements and Details 43
3B.6 Building Colors 46
FORM GROUP C STANDARDS 48
48 49
50 52
53 56
FORM GROUP D STANDARDS 57
3D.1 Roofs 57
3D.2 Walls 59
3D.3 Exterior Openings 60
3D.4 Entry Elements 62
3D.5 Building Elements and Details 64
3D.6 Building Colors 66
DRAFT 5/15/26
8 8 of 127
T O C
Chapter 1

1.1 Intent and Purpose

1.2 Applicability and Approval Process

1.3 Document User Guide

1.4 Form Group Style Guide

1.5 Typical Document Checklist/Layout

1.6 Key Terms

INTRODUCTION
4 DRAFT 5/15/26
9 9 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
The City of Laguna Beach single-family neighborhoods are “eclectic”— not only does no architectural style overwhelmingly characterize any particular neighborhood, the City’s character is a result of a non-rigorous, often hybrid use of architectural styles. Traditionally, Laguna Beach has relied on a combination of design guidelines and discretionary Design Review by decision-makers to regulate the built-form character of their communities. This document is a primary design reference and tool for applicants seeking a more streamlined and ministerial approval process for new single-family and two-family developments.1 You may opt into a discretionary Design Review process
if these standards do not fit with your project goals.

The design standards in this document are measurable, objective, and quantifiable criteria that establish the minimum design requirements for by-right approval while helping to ensure a streamlined and consistent review and approval process by City staff. Use of the design standards by applicants as they plan and design single-family and two-family developments will also foster a consistently applicable design quality that reflects Laguna Beach’s distinct character. 1 The City is located in the Coastal Zone. A Coastal Development Permit may still be required in accordance with Chapter 25.07 of the Laguna Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”).

1.1 INTENT AND PURPOSE
5 DRAFT 5/15/26
10 10 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
The City of Laguna Beach (“City”) single-family neighborhoods are “eclectic”— not only does no architectural style overwhelmingly characterize any particular neighborhood, the City’s character is a result of a non-rigorous, often hybrid use of architectural styles. Traditionally, Laguna Beach has relied on a combination of design guidelines and discretionary Design Review by decision-makers to regulate the built-form character of their communities. This document is a primary design reference and tool for applicants seeking a more streamlined and ministerial approval process for new single-family and two-family developments.1 You may opt into a discretionary Design Review process
if these standards do not fit with your project goals.

This document only applies to single-family and two-family housing developments.2 The design standards in this
document do not apply to multi-family developments,3
mixed-use developments, or non-residential developments.

Figure 1: Applicability Map highlights the Laguna Beach zones that permit single-family and two-family dwellings and projects permitted under Senate Bill 9: California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency (HOME) Act.

Projects that can prove compliance with the standards of this document, as well as compliance with the Laguna Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”), including Section 25.05.0404
shall be approved without Design Review. Single-family or two-family projects that do not comply with the standards in this document may either 1) receive an explanation from City staff regarding the non-compliance, revise the building design to be in compliance, and resubmit their application for approval; 2) choose the established discretionary Design Review process with the Design Review Board or Planning Commission for project approval; or 3) withdraw their application.

The Community Development Director may expand upon and/or regularly update the design standards in this document as per their discretion. The removal of any design standards in this document can only be decided upon by the City Council, following a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 1 The City is located in the Coastal Zone. A Coastal Development Permit may still be required in accordance with Chapter 25.07 of the Laguna Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”).
2 A single- or two-family housing development may have one or more accessory dwelling units and/or junior accessory dwelling units.
3 A multifamily development consists of three or more primary dwelling units, not including any accessory dwelling units. 4 In accordance with LBMC Section 25.05.040, new primary dwelling units that do not exceed a height of 15 feet and a single story, with greater setbacks than those required by the underlying zone as specified, and otherwise complying with all applicable objective development standards in the Zoning Code, are exempt from design review. Note that there may be other triggers for design review, such as grading outside of the building footprint, new swimming pools and spas, and elevated decks or terraces more than three feet above grade.

1.2 APPLICABILITY AND

APPROVAL PROCESS
6 DRAFT 5/15/26
11 11 of 127
T O C
Coast Hwy
First Ave
Monterey St
Del Mar Ave
Avenue W
Catalina St
Bluebird Canyon Dr
Temple Hills Dr
Park Ave
Hillcrest Dr
Jasmine St
High Dr
Park Ave
Alta Laguna Bl
Laguna Canyon Rd
Figure 1. Applicability Map
mile
1/2 1
DRAFT 5/15/26
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction R/HP
Residential Hillside Protection Zone
R-1
Residential Low Density Zone
R-2
Residential Medium Density Zone
R-3
Residential High Density Zone
LBP
Local Business Professional Zone
STP
Sarah Thurston Park Specific Plan
Specific Plan Boundary
DSP
Downtown Specific Plan
VC
Village Community Zone
*NOTE: Residential use is allowed
under conditional use permit
TAB
Three Arch Bay Zone
LAG
Lagunita Zone
ABHSP
Arch Beach Heights Specific Plan
LCAASP
Laguna Canyon Annexation Area Specific Plan
DCSP
Diamond Crestview Specific Plan
CH-M
Commercial-Hotel Zone*
7 12
12 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C

1.3 DOCUMENT USER GUIDE
Prior to the use of this document, applicants should
familiarize themselves with the goals and policies for
new single-family and two-family development in the
General Plan and ensure compliance with any objective
design, development, and subdivision standards within
the City of Laguna Beach Municipal Code, in addition
to the City’s Coastal Development Permit regulations
(LBMC Chapter 25.07). In the event of a conflict between the design standards in this document and the objective standards in the Municipal Code, the more restrictive
standard shall take precedence.

The design standards provided in subsequent chapters
of this document are organized in two categories,
“General Design Standards” and “Form Group Design
Standards.”
The General Design Standards, found in Chapter 2 of
this document, apply to all applicable single-family and two-family developments regardless of architectural
style. Split into two sections, 2.1. Site and 2.2. Massing, the General Design Standards intend to enhance
the pedestrian experience of projects by prioritizing
the orientation of buildings towards public streets,
providing pathways that connect public rights-ofway to project entries, and promoting safety through exterior lighting. The massing design standards in this chapter require modulation to avoid box-like forms and
promote 360-degree design and architectural continuity
between primary and accessory structures.

The Form Group Design Standards, found in the
chapters following the General Design Standards,
strive to capture the wide variety of architectural styles present in Laguna Beach through four different stylistic frameworks, consistent with characteristic elements. An applicant must select one Form Group and comply with
all of the standards in that chapter. Each Form Group
chapter provides distinct design standards defining
roofs, walls, exterior openings, building details, and a building color palette.

Form
Group B
Form
Group C
Form
Group D
Form
Group A
Familiarize yourself with the intent and purpose
of this document and determine the building use
of the proposed project, as projects with uses
other than single-family or two-family are not
applicable. Before continuing to other chapters,
review Chapter 1.6: Key Terms.

Comply with Chapter 2: General Design Standards
and complete the correlated Applicant Checklist
to confirm compliance with the design criteria.

Select one Form Group and comply with the
standards in Chapter 3: Form Group Design
Standards associated with the selected Form
Group. Complete the correlated Applicant Checklist
to confirm compliance with the design criteria.

Single-Family
Chapter 2
General Design Standards
Chapter 3:

Form Group Design Standards &
Compliance Checklist
Two-Family

1. REVIEW CHAPTER 1

2. COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS

3. SELECT A FORM GROUP TO COMPLY WITH

HOW TO USE THIS

DOCUMENT
T O C
8 DRAFT 5/15/26
13 13 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Form Group A
Arts and Crafts, Shingle, and Bungalow Style Characteristics Form Group A is based upon the composite of Arts and Crafts, Shingle, and Bungalow style homes seen throughout older Laguna Beach neighborhoods. Roof forms range from gentle to more steeply sloped gabled, side-gabled, and cross gabled forms, sometimes with hips. Uncharacteristic of this form group are flat roofs. Roof surfaces usually utilize three-dimensional architectural asphalt shingles. Eaves and rakes are deep and articulated by rafters and brackets. Building bulk is broken down by a collage of minor massing components including use of varied roof ridge heights, and smaller asymmetrical masses such as attached porches, verandas, and bay windows. Entry porches are common, sometimes stretching across almost an entire facade, and feature wood, stone, or rough stucco columns and piers. Individual windows are vertically oriented, though often ganged to realize horizontal expression across elevations. Entry doors are paneled and typically glazed, some with vertical sidelights. Both windows and doors are set on facade surfaces complemented with large and small trim details at headers, jambs, sills, and aprons. The overall character of these structures is predominantly delineated by their vertical surfacing, natural and painted wood or composite fiber cement wood. Building elevations are skinned with all manner and combinations of vertical and horizontal siding, shingles, and board and battens. Accent colors at trim clearly contrast with the natural or painted surfaces. More fanciful homes in this group feature trellises, brick and rubble chimneys, towers, and rubble-work at building, column, and pier bases. Use of this latter material is often seen to extend to retaining, garden, and security walls.

1.4 FORM GROUP STYLE GUIDE
Steeply sloped
cross-gabled
roof
Rafter tails
Wood
shingles
Ganged vertical
windows
Glazed entry
door
Stone chimney
9 DRAFT 5/15/26
14 14 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Form Group B
Southern California Spanish Revival and Mediterranean Style Characteristics Form Group B incorporates the full range of Southern California Spanish Revival and Mediterranean traditions in Laguna Beach. These projects feature a variety of roof forms including low-pitched gabled, hipped, and cross-gabled roofs clad with terracotta clay tiles, as well as flat roofs with extended parapets capped by stucco coping, tiles, or coping ledges. Light colored stucco walls are paired with accent colors at windows and openings and include the use of half-round arches. Facades may include larger focal windows ornamented with arches, cast stone edging, and decorative window grills that divide the glazing. Recessed openings establish shadowing. Porches take the form of arcades and galleries, sometimes defined by arched bays. Structures are further defined with minor masses at entries or key living areas, offsetting of building planes, and massing accent elements such as round, square, or polygonal tower elements with pyramidal or gabled roofs placed at entries or at building corners.

Red terracotta clay
barrel roof tiles Chimney Gable vents
Arched entry
Minor mass Low- to moderatelypitched rooflines
Little to no roof
overhang
10 DRAFT 5/15/26
15 15 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Shingle roof
Flat rectangular
window
Wooden door Leaded window
Form Group C
Tudor, English Cottage, French Cottage, Norman, Storybook Style Influences Form Group C is based upon an appreciation of the many examples of Tudor, English Cottage, French Cottage, Norman, Storybook and the like residences seen in Laguna Beach. These dwellings are characterized by whimsical, informal, and asymmetrical massing featuring steeper pitched roofs, often with hips and multiple ridgelines, and often complemented by conical and pyramidal tower and dormer skyline accents. The overall bulk of structures is broken down by collaging onto major volumes smaller building expressions including projecting and gabled minor masses, bay and oriel windows, porches, entry canopies, turrets, and chimneys.

Openings are set flat onto wall surfaces but expressed by flat or decorative trim at headers, jambs, and sills.

Individual windows, sometimes with transoms, are vertically proportioned, and divided, including at times with lattice or diamond patterning. The widest range of materials, singly and in combination, are featured including wood, composite, and slate shingles at roofs. Exterior walls feature a dominant material such as smooth and rough stucco, horizontal siding, or shingles, sometimes complimented by a secondary material such as brick or cobble on a feature such as a chimney. In almost all cases, a further decorative articulation of the main surface material is utilized through incorporation of half-timbering, or decorative shingles, or use of quoins or cast stone at feature points such as entries or building corners. These decorative accents, whether patterned masonry or stone at a chimney, or projecting bay windows, half-timbering, or the repetition of minor gables beneath major roof shapes, establish the intricate and informal quality of these residences.

Cross-gabled
roof
Chimney
11 DRAFT 5/15/26
16 16 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Photo:

Malaga Cove Plaza, Palos Verdes Estates, CA., 1939
Horizontal
siding
Outdoor
terrace
Entry porch
Low-pitched
roofline
Cross-gabled
roof
Large
windows
Form Group D
Ranch, Minimal Traditional, Mid-20th-Century, and Contemporary Style Characteristics Form Group D is influenced by the presence of Ranch, Minimal Traditional, and Mid-20th-Century post and beam structures seen throughout Laguna Beach. This Group is characterized by low-pitched roof lines sometimes establishing broad eaves and deep soffits hovering over entries or outdoor terraces, as well as flat-roofed structures. Windows and openings are larger in scale, floor to ceiling in some cases. These buildings, more often than the designs of the other form groups, emphasize indoor-outdoor living and transparency between the inside and outside. A wide range of materials, from vertical and horizontal siding to stucco and stone are seen on these structures. While overall wall surfaces are flatly rendered, almost always present is a feature, such as a deep overhang, the use of a secondary accent material, a feature window or bay at a prime living space, a corner window, or brightly colored entry door, that establishes the quality of these homes. 12 DRAFT 5/15/26
17 17 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

Select one
option:

Applicant Checklist:

Applicants shall use this Checklist and indicate compliance with all design standards in Chapter 2 and all design
standards in the selected Form Groups in Chapter 3. Under “Sheet Number,” the applicant must indicate on what
project sheet the information pertaining to the standard can be found. If a standard does not apply to the project (i.e. standards for surface parking when the proposed project has a garage), the applicant may check “Not Applicable” (N/A).

T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable
37 3B.1.1 Roofs, allowed types. Utilize at least one of the following roof types. All other roof types are prohibited.
a. Gabled.
b. Cross-gabled.
c. Hipped.
d. Cross-hipped.
e. Flat, not to exceed 20 percent of the total roof area. 3B.1.2 Roof Material. Provide one of the following materials. a. Spanish, Pantile, Mission, or Roman terracotta tile; straight or tapered barrel.
b. Plain concrete tile.
3B.1.3 Roof pitch. Roof pitches shal be a minimum 2:12 slope and a maximum 4:12 slope.
3B.1.4 Optional: roof rake. If provided, roof rakes shall be a maximum of 12 inches in height and horizontally project no more than six inches inclusive of the rake tile.
3B.1.5 Optional: roof eave. If provided, eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of six inches and a maximum of 12 inches, measured from the edge of the exterior wall to the edge of the eave.

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Proposed
Project Name:
3B.1 ROOFS
The following design standards are for single-family and two-family residential projects that have selected Form Group B. For more information on Form Group B, see Section 1.4: Form Group Style Guide.

Select at
least one
option:

Select
only one
option:

FORM GROUP B STANDARDS
Applicant
Name:

Email:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:

To demonstrate compliance with the design
standards, project applicants must fill out the
Applicant Information form to the right and the
Applicant Checklist for all standards in this chapter
by checking “compliant” or “not applicable” as
appropriate and indicating the project sheet number
that the information pertaining to the standard
can be found. This chapter shall be included in
the application submittal package. If the applicant
requires additional space to further explain or
illustrate compliance to a standard, attachments
may also be submitted along with the Checklist. For
more information on the checklists and City review,
see Chapter 1: Introduction.

Southern California Spanish Revival and Mediterranean Style Characteristics CITY USE ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
38 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Primary walls shall be a natural finish stucco or a pigmented and painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes.
a. Cat Face finish.
b. English finish.
c. Fine Sand Float finish.
d. Glacier finish.
e. Light Dash finish.
f. Medium Dash finish.
g. Heavy Dash finish.
h. Medium Sand Float finish.
i. Monterey finish.
j. Sand/float 20/30 finish.
k. Santa Barbara finish.
l. Spanish finish.
m. Smooth finish.
n. Trowel Sweep finish.
o. Tunnel Dash finish.
3B.2.2 Optional: secondary wall material. If provided, secondary wall materials shall not exceed 10 percent of each elevation surface area and be composed of one of the following.
a. Board and batten fiber cement or wood siding.
b. Cast stone.
c. Matte or non-glossy ceramic, decorative, porcelain, or terracotta tiles.
d. Stone.
3B.2 WALLS
A gabled roof with terracotta tile. See standards 3B.1.1 and 3B.1.2.

Select one
option:

Select all
that apply:

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
38 Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Primary walls shall be a natural finish stucco or a pigmented and painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes.
a. Cat Face finish.
b. English finish.
c. Fine Sand Float finish.
d. Glacier finish.
e. Light Dash finish.
f. Medium Dash finish.
g. Heavy Dash finish.
h. Medium Sand Float finish.
i. Monterey finish.
j. Sand/float 20/30 finish.
k. Santa Barbara finish.
l. Spanish finish.
m. Smooth finish.
n. Trowel Sweep finish.
o. Tunnel Dash finish.
3B.2.2 Optional: secondary wall material. If provided, secondary wall materials shall not exceed 10 percent of each elevation surface area and be composed of one of the following.
a. Board and batten fiber cement or wood siding.
b. Cast stone.
c. Matte or non-glossy ceramic, decorative, porcelain, or terracotta tiles.
d. Stone.
3B.2 WALLS
A gabled roof with terracotta tile. See standards 3B.1.1 and 3B.1.2.

Select one
option:

Select all
that apply:

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
3B.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Primary walls shall be a natural finish stucco or a pigmented and painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes.
a. Cat Face finish.
b. English finish.
c. Fine Sand Float finish.
d. Glacier finish.
e. Light Dash finish.
f. Medium Dash finish.
g. Heavy Dash finish.
h. Medium Sand Float finish.
i. Monterey finish.
j. Sand/float 20/30 finish.
k. Santa Barbara finish.
l. Spanish finish.
m. Smooth finish.
n. Trowel Sweep finish.
o. Tunnel Dash finish.
3B.2.2 Optional: secondary wall material. If provided, secondary wall materials shall not exceed 10 percent of each elevation surface area and be composed of one of the following.
a. Board and batten fiber cement or wood siding.
b. Cast stone.
c. Matte or non-glossy ceramic, decorative, porcelain, or terracotta tiles.
3B.2 WALLS
A gabled roof with terracotta tile. See standards 3B.1.1 and 3B.1.2.

Select one
option:

Select all
that apply:

1.5 TYPICAL DOCUMENT CHECKLIST/LAYOUT
Design Standard
Form Group and
Section Title
Table of Contents
Button
Precedent
Imagery
Additional Applicant Selection:

Some standards in this document are written to provide design flexibility, asking applicants to select from a list of options in order to achieve compliance. Applicants must indicate their selection(s) in this area when additional selection is requested.

City Reviewer Checklist:

Upon receiving an applicant’s submittal package,
inclusive of the checklists, the City shall utilize
the same checklists to confirm compliance with
the design standards.
13 DRAFT 5/15/26
18 18 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
A
Apron. A piece of decorative
trim installed horizontally on
the wall directly beneath the
window sill.

Arcade. A pedestrian
walkway delineated by
vertical structural members
supporting a roof, which
provides shade, accessible
through large openings
at either end and along
the length of the walkway.

Openings extend to the
ground and are separated
only by structural members
allowing for access and
views from the interior to
the exterior and vice versa.

Awning. A canopy, typically
over windows and doors, that
shelters people or things
from the rain or sun.

B
Ballast. Heavy material
used to stabilize structures
against wind uplift,
particularly in roofing
systems.

Barge board. A board
fastened to each projecting
gable of a roof to give it
strength and protection, and
to conceal the otherwise
exposed end grain of the
horizontal timbers or purlins
of the roof.

Battered foundation.

A structure, common
in retaining walls and
foundations, that tapers
inward as it rises, meaning it
is thicker at the base than at
the top.

Board and batten. Vertical
siding wall treatment using
wide boards and narrow
strips (battens) to cover
joints.

Bracket. A structural or
decorative element that
projects from a wall,
usually to carry weight and
sometimes to strengthen an
angle.

C
Cast stone. A refined artificial
stone, typically a form of
precast concrete, used as a
building material to simulate
natural-cut masonry.

Chimney pot. A pipe installed
atop a chimney stack to
increase height, improve
draught for efficiency, and
protect against rain and
debris.

Chimney cap or hood. A
protective cover installed
on top of a chimney flue
to prevent water damage,
animal intrusion, and debris
buildup.

Chimney, crown. An
articulation at the visual
edge of the top of a chimney
Column, H-column. A column
with an H-shaped crosssection.

Column, I-beam. A column
with an I-shaped crosssection.

Column, square. A column
with a square cross-section.

1.6 KEY TERMS
The following definitions are for specialized terms used in this document. This section is supplemental to Chapter

25.08 (Definitions and Standards) of the City of Laguna Beach Municipal Code. 14 DRAFT 5/15/26
19 19 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Concrete, board-formed.

A construction technique
where concrete is poured
into wooden forms, leaving
a lasting, textured grain
pattern on the surface.

Concrete, salt finished. A
decorative technique created
by pressing coarse rock salt
into freshly poured, wet
concrete, then washing it
away after setting to leave a
speckled, pitted texture.

Concrete, scored or stamped.

A decorative technique
involving cutting shallow,
1/16 to 1/4-inch deep,
grooves into hardened
concrete to create patterns
like tiles, diamonds, or lines.

Concrete, textured. A
decorative or functional
finish, such as stamped,
stenciled, exposed aggregate,
applied to concrete surfaces
to improve traction,
durability, and at times mimic
natural materials.

Cornice. A decorative,
projecting molding that
crowns the top of a building,
wall, or chimney, typically
located below the roofline.

D
Door leaf. The largest panel
of a door, attached to a door
frame by hinges, and swings
open and closed.

Dormer. A projecting
structure built out from
a sloping roof, usually
housing a vertical window or
ventilating louver.

E
Eave. The junction of the
lower edge of a sloped roof
and the wall of a building,
running parallel to the
ground plane.

Edging. The use of a material
to highlight the juncture of
two different elements.

F
Face stone. The exterior
surface or visible portion of
natural stone, specifically
denoting the exposed part
of a stone that has been cut,
dressed, or finished to meet
aesthetic and functional
requirements.

Fully shielded. Exterior
lighting units designed with
a solid, opaque top and side
barriers that direct light
exclusively downward.

G
Grille. Decorative bars
inserted within window
frame or attached on top of a
window to create a pattered,
multi-pane look.

H
Half-timbering. A technique
featuring an exposed, loadbearing timber skeleton.

Head. The top, horizontal
member of a window frame.

HEX color. A six-digit
alphanumeric code that
specifies a color based on its
intensity of red, green, and
blue.
15 DRAFT 5/15/26
20 20 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
J
Jamb. The vertical or
horizontal frame component
that forms the outer
perimeter of a window unit.

See ‘Head.’
K
Knee brace. See ‘Bracket.’
L
Lap siding. Exterior cladding
where horizontal boards
overlap to shed watter
efficiently.

Lighting, bistro. See ‘Lighting,
string,’
Lighting, festoon. See
‘Lighting, string,’
Lighting, string. A series of
small, often decorative, light
bulbs connected along a
flexible wire, cable, or string.

Low E coating.

A microscopically thin,
transparent layer of metal
oxide applied to window
glass that reflects infrared
heat while allowing visible
light to pass through.

Lumen. The SI unit of
luminous flux, equal to the
amount of light emitted
per second in a unit solid
angle of one steradian from
a uniform source of one
candela.

M
Major massing. The primary,
dominant volumes or the
main body of a building.

Minor massing. The
secondary, subordinate
volumes or smaller building
elements that are attached
to or set within the main
body of a building, often used
to add articulation, depth,
and rhythm to a building
facade.

Mullion. A vertical, structural
member that divides a large
window opening into smaller,
individual glass panes or
units.

Muntin. Thin strips that
divide a single window sash
into smaller planes.

O
Opening, arched. A curved or
rounded top.

Opening, pointed arch.

Two arcs meeting at a central
apex to create a distinctive
“pointy” look.

Opening, segmental arch. A
structural arch composed of
a circular arc that is less than
a semicircle.

Overhang. A protruding
structure off of a building
facade that may provide
protection for lower levels.

P
Porch. An exterior covered
approach or vestibule to a
doorway.

Porte-cochere. A covered
entrance large enough for
vehicles to pass through,
typically opening into a
courtyard.

R
Rafter tail. Structural or
decorate ends of roof rafters
that extend beyond the
exterior walls, creating a
distinctively styled, exposed
eave or overhang.

Rafter. A series of sloped
structural beams that extend
from the ridge or hip of a
roof down to the wall plane.

Rail. The top and bottom
parts of a window sash.
16 DRAFT 5/15/26
21 21 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Rake. The junction of the
lower edge of a sloped roof
and the wall of a building,
following the slope of the
roof.

Recess. A set-back area or
indentation within a wall or
building facade, typically at
doors and windows.

River rock. Smooth and
rounded stones that have
been polished by the
constant movement of water
in rivers and streams.

Roof ridge. The highest
horizontal lines on a roof
where two sloping planes
meet at the top of a
structure.

Roof, clipped-gabled. A
traditional gable roof with a
small hip section at the peak.

Roof, conical. A cone-shaped,
often circular-based, roof
structure that tapers to a
single point.

Roof, cross-gabled.

The intersection of two or
more gable rooflines, usually
positioned perpendicular
to one another at a ninetydegree angle.

Roof, cross-hipped.

The connection of two or
more hip roof sections
at perpendicular angles,
typically creating an L- or
T-shaped structure.

Roof, flat. The angle of a
roof is sloped less than 15
degrees.

Roof, front-gabled.

A gable roof, where the
triangular gable end faces
the street.

Roof, gable. A triangularshaped roof design featuring
two sloping sides that meet
at a central ridge, forming a
peak.

Roof, hexagonal. A six-sided
roof structure where six
sloping panels meet at a
central peak.

Roof, hip. A triangular-shaped
roof design featuring four
sloping sides that meet at a
top ridge.

Roof, shed. A single-sloped
roof surface.

S
Sash. The movable or fixed
framework that holds the
glazing within a window
structure.

Shingle, composite. A highperformance material made
from recycled polymers,
plastics, and rubber to mimic
slate or cedar shake.

Shingle, dimensional.

Roofing material featuring a
layered design that mimics
cedar shake or slate.
17 DRAFT 5/15/26
22 22 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Shutter. A solid and stable
window covering, consisting
of a frame with horizontal
slats, solid panels, or fabric.

Side casing. The vertical trim
molding that covers the gap
between the window frame
and the wall to provide a
finished, decorative edge.

Sidelite, full glass. A narrow,
stationary vertical window
panel positioned on one
or both sides of an entry
door, featuring a single,
uninterrupted pane of glass.

Sidelite, half glass. A narrow,
stationary vertical window
panel positioned on one or
both sides of an entry door,
featuring glass only on the
top half of the panel.

Sidelite, vision glass. A
narrow, stationary vertical
window panel positioned
on one or both sides of an
entry door, featuring small to
medium framed glass inserts.

Sill. A ledge forming the
bottom part of a window.

Simulated sticking
Decorative grids applied
to the exterior and interior
surfaces of a single, large
pane of glass to mimic the
appearance of traditional,
individual window panes
Single-ply roofing.

A flexible, lightweight
membrane applied in a
single layer, commonly
used on low-slope or flat
commercial roofs.

Slate tile roofing.

Natural stone roofing
material.

Standard seam metal
roofing. Roofing system
featuring vertical panels
with concealed fasteners to
prevent leaks and allow for
thermal expansion.

Stile. A vertical side member
of a window sash or frame.

Stucco, 16/20 Heavy Sand
Float finish. A textured stucco
application using coarse
sand (16/20 mesh) to create
a bold, gritty, and uniform
sandpaper-like appearance.

Stucco, 16/20 Medium Sand
Float finish. Stucco texture
created using a 16/20
aggregate blend (a mix of
16 and 20 mesh sand) and a
sponge float.

Stucco, 20/30 Fine Sand
Float finish. A premium,
uniform, and slightly textured
stucco finish characterized
by a tight, consistent
appearance created with fine,
20/30 graded aggregate.

Stucco, Briar finish. A
textured appearance stucco
characterized by random,
intersecting lines, often
created using a specialized
trowel technique.

Stucco, Cat Face finish.

A decorative stucco texture
characterized by a largely
smooth, troweled surface
broken up by random,
sporadic patches of
rough, textured base coat
resembling “cat faces.”
Stucco, Combed finish. A
decorative texture created
by dragging a toothed
tool through the wet, thick
topcoat of stucco to produce
a series of parallel, raised
lines or grooves.
18 DRAFT 5/15/26
23 23 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Stucco, English finish.

A traditional, hand-applied
stucco texture characterized
by a rustic, old-world
appearance featuring
wide, overlapping, and
intermingled indentations.

Stucco, Fine Sand Float finish.

Stucco texture characterized
by uniformly sized sand
aggregate to achieve a tight,
minimally textured look.

Stucco, Glacier finish.

A warm white or off-white
color, often utilized as an
integrated color finish coat
to stucco to provide a clean,
modern, or Mediterranean
look.

Stucco, Heavy Dash finish.

A highly textured, rough
exterior plaster application
achieved by spraying a thick,
cementitious mixture using
a hopper gun or pressure
sprayer.

Stucco, Heavy Lace finish.

A decorative, hand-applied
stucco texture characterized
by dense, overlapping “blobs,”
peaks, and valleys that create
a complex, porous pattern
resembling thick lace.

Stucco, Knockdown Dash
finish. A textured exterior
coating created by spraying
a wet, soupy stucco mix onto
a wall to create a rough,
“dashed” texture, which is
then flattened or “knocked
down” with a trowel.

Stucco, Light Dash finish.

A textured exterior coating
applied by spraying or handthrowing a cementitious
mixture onto a wet base coat,
resulting in a moderately
rough, pebbled appearance.

Stucco, Light Lace finish.

A durable stucco texture
featuring a delicate, cloudy,
or “skip-trowel” pattern that
creates moderate texture to
hide imperfections.

Stucco, Medium Dash
finish. A textured stucco
coating characterized by
a moderately rough, gritty,
and bumpy surface, often
described as having small,
evenly distributed, or dense
peaks.

Stucco, Monterey finish.

A heavy-texture stucco
application characterized
by an often two-coat, handtroweled application that
creates a rustic appearance.

Stucco, Sand/float 20/30
finish. A textured stucco
application using a 20/30
mesh sand aggregate to
produce a fine-to-medium
grit sandpaper appearance.

Stucco, Santa Barbara or
Mission finish. A stucco
coating characterized by
a very smooth, semi-fine,
and slightly variegated
(mottled) texture that mimics
traditional, historic adobe
buildings.

Stucco, Smooth finish. A
stucco coating characterized
by a flat, modern, and sleek
appearance with no visible
grain.

Stucco, Spanish finish.

A traditional stucco texture
characterized by a mottled,
semi-smooth appearance
with subtle, raised “islands”
or “clouds” of texture.
19 DRAFT 5/15/26
24 24 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Stucco, Trowel Sweep finish.

A decorative texture created
by applying a top coat of
stucco and using a steel
trowel in rapid, fan-shaped
strokes.

Stucco, Tunnel Dash finish. A
highly textured, rustic stucco
application characterized
by a heavy, dripping, and
gravity-defying, bumpy
appearance.

Stucco, Wet Groove Plaster
finish. A decorative stucco
technique that involves
cutting or raking joints into
the final, wet layer of cement
mortar to create a textured,
block-like appearance, similar
to tiled or ashlar stone walls.

Synthetic shake roofing. A
modern, high-performance
roofing material engineered
to replicate the authentic,
hand-split look of natural
cedar shakes, but made from
blends of rubber, plastic, and
polymers.

T
Terracotta tile, straight
barrel. Tiles that are roughly
consistent in width from
top to bottom, creating a
more consistent and uniform
roofing aesthetic.

Terracotta tile, tapered
barrel. Tiles that are wider at
one end and narrower at the
other, creating a more rustic,
varied appearance.

Tower element. A structural
part of a larger building that
is higher in proportion to its
lateral dimensions.

Trellis. Freestanding or
attached vertical structure
with posts, supporting a
semi-open, slatted roof
structure.

True divide. A traditional
window design featuring
multiple individual glass
panes separated by a grid of
muntins, rather than a single
sheet of glass.

Veneer stone. A lightweight,
thin layer of natural or
manufactured stone used
as a decorative facing on
exterior walls, offering the
aesthetic appeal of fullthickness stone but more
affordable and easier to
install.

Wall vent. Functional and/
or aesthetic openings that
facilitate continuous airflow
and prevent moisture
buildup.

Window, awning. A type of
window hinged at the top,
designed to open outward
from the bottom.

Window, bay. A window built
to project outward from an
outside wall.

Window, casement. A window
with hinges on the side that
opens outward or inward like
a door.

Window, corner expression.

A window that goes around a
corner.

Window, double-hung.

A window featuring two
operable sashes that slide
vertically up and down
within the frame.

Window, fixed. A nonoperable window designed
to remain stationary.
20 DRAFT 5/15/26
25 25 of 127
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Introduction T O C
Window, ganged casement.

Two or more individual
casement windows are
joined together, side-byside, within a single, unified structural frame.

Window, ganged. Two or
more individual window
units joined together sideby-side or stacked vertically to function as a single, larger
unit.

Window, hopper. A singlesash window hinged at the
bottom that tilts inward from
the top.

Window, oriel. A form of bay
window that projects from
an upper story, supported by
brackets and corbels rather
than rising from the ground.

Window, picture.A typically
fixed window, with or without
muntins and divides, that
provides an unobstructed
view of the outdoors.

Window, single-hung. A
window where only the
bottom sash moves up and
down for ventilation, while
the top sash remains fixed in
place.

Window, sliding. A window
that opens horizontally by
gliding on tracks at the top
and bottom of the frame.

Window, transom. A window
set above the transom of a
door.

Wingwall. A parallel
structural extension to an
existing wall.
21 DRAFT 5/15/26
26 26 of 127
T O C
Chapter 2

GENERAL DESIGN

STANDARDS

2.1 Site

2.2 Massing
22 DRAFT 5/15/26
27 27 of 127
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: General Design Standards

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
23 2.1.1 Publicly visible gate or door. At least one project entry, either a gate or door, shall be directly visible from the public right of way.

2.1 SITE

GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Applicant
Name:

Email:

Proposed
Project Name:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:

The General Design Standards apply to all single-family and two-family developments regardless of Form Group.
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable
A gate connected to the public right-of-way provides entry to the single-family home.

See standard 2.1.1.

2.1.2 On-site pedestrian pathway. All project entries shall be internally connected to the public right-of-way by a minimum four-foot-wide continuous pathway.

2.1.3 Garage orientation. Where an alley provides access to a residential lot, the garage shall be accessed from the alley.
28 28 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
24 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: General Design Standards

2.1.4 Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting shall utilize the following criteria. • Each exterior lighting fixture shall not emit more than 1,000 lumens and shall be fully shielded, with all light directed downward. • Notwithstanding the requirements of standard 2.1.4.a, the following light fixtures with visible light sources are allowed.
• A maximum of two light fixtures with visible light sources not exceeding 750 lumens and placed a maximum of seven feet above the adjacent finished surface shall be allowed on the total of all exterior walls that are oriented in the same direction. • Bistro, festoon, or string lighting where no individual lamp emits more than 50 lumens and the lumen density of the string is no greater than 25 lumens per foot.
• Directional light fixtures used for facade illumination which are shielded and aimed to hit their target.
• Security lighting that exceeds the lumen levels and light source visibility otherwise allowed by this Section shall be by fully shielded fixtures, activated by motion detection, and automatically turn off no more than five minutes after activity is no longer detected. • No lighting or lighting fixture shall be more than 10 feet above grade in the front yard and 15 feet above grade elsewhere.
• No more than two exterior light fixtures with visible light sources are permitted for each wall and building elevation, with a maximum of eight total fixtures allowed on a lot or parcel.

A gate connected to the public right-of-way provides entry to the single-family home.

See standard 2.1.1.
29 29 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
25 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: General Design Standards

2.2 MASSING

2.2.1 Building wall, maximum length. A straight and continuous building wall shall not exceed 30 feet in length without a horizontal offset in plan that establishes, top to bottom of the wall, a minimum 18-inch offset for sites with less than 50 feet of street frontage and a three-foot offset for sites with 50 feet or greater street frontage.

2.2.2 Architectural continuity, detached garages and accessory structures. Detached garages and accessory structures shall be architecturally treated and meet the form group standards of the primary structure by implementing at least two of the following components.
a. Consistent use of roof forms and if sloped, roof materials and colors. b. Consistent use of facade materials.
c. Consistent use of primary wall colors.

Exterior lights at the site entry and building entry are no more than 10 feet above grade.

See standard 2.1.4.

2.2.3 Rooftop-mounted equipment. Rooftop-mounted equipment shall be screened from view either behind a pitched roof or behind a parapet, wall, or screen that is a minimum six inches taller than the tallest equipment of the roof.

2.2.4 Glazing. Glazing at openings shall be clear glass or clear glass with a nonreflective Low E coating.

2.2.5 Skylights. With the exception of flat glass skylights constituting no more than five percent of the roof area, all skylights, including dome skylights, are prohibited.

Select at
least two
options:
30 30 of 127
T O C
26 Chapter 3

FORM GROUP

STANDARDS
3A Form Group A Standards
3B Form Group B Standards
3C Form Group C Standards
3D Form Group D Standards
26 DRAFT 5/15/26
31 31 of 127
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.1.1 Roofs, allowed types. Utilize at least one of the following roof types. All other roof types are prohibited.
a. Front-gabled.
b. Cross-gabled.
c. Hipped.
3A.1.2 Roof material. Provide one of the following roof materials. a. Dimensional shingles.
b. Composite shingles and tiles that simulate shake, slate, and concrete.
c. Concrete tiles.
d. Metal roofing and standard seam metal roofing meeting the color standards of §A.6.
e. Slate shingles.
f. Dimensional architectural asphalt shingles.

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
27 Select at
least one
option:

Select
only one
option:
3A.1 BUILDING ROOFS
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable

FORM GROUP A STANDARDS

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Applicant
Name:

Email:

Proposed
Project Name:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:

The following design standards are for single-family and two-family residential projects that have selected Form Group A. For more information on Form Group A, see Section 1.4: Form Group Style Guide.

Arts and Crafts, Shingle, and Bungalow Style Characteristics 32 32 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
28 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.1.3 Roof pitch. Roof pitches shall be a minimum 3:12 slope and a maximum 8:12 slope.
3A.1.4 Roof rake. Roof rakes shall comply with all of the following standards. • Measured from the main roof form to the exterior wall, rakes shall horizontally project a minimum of 18 inches to a maximum of three feet.
• Measured from the dormer to the exterior wall, rakes shall horizontally project a minimum of eight inches and a maximum of 14 inches. 3A.1.5 Roof eave. Roof eaves shall comply with all of the following standards • Measured from the main roof form, eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of two-and-a-half feet.
• At the dormer, eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of eight inches.

The detached garage uses the same roof slope, roof material, and vertical siding as the primary structure behind. See standard 2.2.2.
33 33 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
29 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Utilize any of the following materials for primary walls.
a. Wood or fiber cement board and batten, minimum 50 percent of each elevation surface area.
b. Wood or fiber cement lap siding, minimum 50 percent of each elevation surface area.
c. Wood or fiber cement shingle, minimum 50 percent of each elevation surface area.
d. Natural finish stucco, or a pigmented and painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes and a maximum 50 percent of each elevation surface area.
i. 16/20 Medium Sand Float finish.
ii. 16/20 Heavy Sand Float finish.
iii. 20/30 Fine Sand Float finish.
iv. English finish.
v. Light Dash finish.
vi. Medium Dash finish.
vii.Heavy Dash finish.
viii. Tunnel Dash finish.
ix. Santa Barbara or Mission finish.
x. Smooth finish.
3A.2.2 Optional: additional wall material. If provided, additional wall materials shall not exceed 30 percent of each elevation surface area and be composed of one of the following.
a. Concrete, painted per the requirements of §A.6.
b. River rock.
c. Brick.
d. Cast stone.
e. Stone.
3A.2 WALLS
Stone is used as an additional wall material to highlight the entrance. See standard 3A.2.2.

Select one
option:

Select all
that apply:
34 34 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
30 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.3.1 Exterior openings: percentage of wall. Exterior openings on all building walls with the same orientation, inclusive of doors and windows, shall be a minimum of 15 percent and a maximum of 35 percent.
3A.3 EXTERIOR OPENINGS
Window Surround Dimension
Apron 3 inches min.

Head 3 inches min.

Jamb 3 inches min.
3A.3.2 Exterior openings types. Provide a minimum of three distinct exterior opening sizes, inclusive of doors and windows.
3A.3.3 Exterior opening shapes. Openings shall be rectangular or circular in shape. 3A.3.4 Exterior opening surrounds. Opening surrounds, when provided at the exterior edge of a window or door opening, shall comply with the dimensions per the table below.

Windows and doors do not exceed 35 percent of all building walls. See standard 3A.3.1. 3A.3.5 Exterior opening materials. With the exception of the front door, provide one of the following exterior opening materials with clear glazing. a. Wood, pre-finished, stained, or painted per the color requirements of §A.6.
b. Metal-clad wood, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §A.6.
c. Steel, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §A.6. d. Composite, acrylic, or fiberglass [AV23.1][D23.2]set a minimum of two inches inward from the adjacent exterior surface and finished per the color requirements of §A.6.

Select one
option:
35 35 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
31 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.3.6 Window types. Provide at least one and a maximum of two of the following window types.
a. Awning.
b. Casement.
c. Double-hung.
d. Fixed.
e. Ganged, with a maximum three windows either fixed all across, casement all across, or casement sandwiched by fixed.
f. Single-hung.

Casement and fixed windows. See standard 3A.3.6.
3A.3.7 Window recess. Not applicable.
3A.3.8 Window sashes, rails, and stiles. Window sashes, rails, and stiles shall be a minimum of two inches wide (jambs) or two inches high (sills or heads). 3A.3.9 Window muntins, mullions, and sticking. Window muntins, mullions, and sticking shall comply with all of the following standards. • Provide muntins, mullions, or sticking to create true divides at all window sashes with a glazing area greater than one square foot in size, as well as at glazing at doors with a glazing area greater than one square foot in size. When a double-hung window, transom window, or vertically ganged window is utilized, a divided window sash over an undivided window may be utilized.
• Window muntins, mullions, and sticking[D24.1] that divide window sash shall have a minimum ½-inch profile.
• Simulated, snap-on, and between glass muntins or sticking is prohibited.
3A.3.10 Door leaves. Provide no more than two contiguous door leaves.

Select 1-2
options:
36 36 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
32 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.4 ENTRY ELEMENTS
3A.4.1 Entry element. Provide two of the following entry elements. a. Street-facing entries placed either at grade or a maximum 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade shall comply with at least one of the following.
i. Recessed a minimum of two feet from a building plane that faces a street.
ii. Framed by an arched or segmental arched opening(s). iii. Incorporated into a projecting minor mass that does not exceed the eave line by more than three feet or a tower element that does not exceed the otherwise allowed height limit.
b. An entry path no greater than five feet in width shall connect at least one street to the primary residential entry. Within ten feet of the entry, the path may exceed this width but shall not exceed in this area adjacent to the entry a width of more than eight feet. The entry path shall incorporate one or more of the following materials. i. Colored and scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
ii. Scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
iii. Concrete or stone pavers no larger than 30 inches by 30 inches.
iv. Brick used as a uniform or as an accent material.
c. Porches with columns and/or piers, comprising all of the following standards.
• Porches shall make up a maximum of 60 percent of the
primary frontage.
• Columns shall be one of the following shapes.

1. H-column.

2. I-beam.

3. Square.
• Columns shall be wood, stained or painted per the
requirements in §A.6.
d. Roof overhangs comprising all of the following standards. • Overhangs shall provide a minimum horizontal projection of three feet.
• Overhangs may be supported by brackets.
e. Trellises, a minimum of three feet in depth, either stained, natural, or painted per the requirements in §A.6.

Select two
options:
37 37 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
33 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.4.2 Fence and wall materials. Fences and walls facing public streets or rightsof-way and within a required setback shall be constructed of the following materials or any combination of the following materials. a. Wood, stained or painted per the requirements in §A.6. b. Stucco or stucco plaster, integrally colored or painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
c. Stone, face stone, and/or veneer stone.

This porch, supported by square beams, highlights the building entrance. See standard 3A.4.1.

A stained wood fence faces the public right-of-way. See standard 3A.4.2.

Select all
that apply:
38 38 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
34 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.5 BUILDING ELEMENTS AND DETAILS
3A.6.1 Building elements. If the following building elements are incorporated into a design, they shall meet the following criteria.
a. Chimneys that comply with all of the following standards. • Chimneys shall utilize one of the following materials.

1. Brick, naturally fired.

2. River rock or rounded cobbles.

3. Stucco, finished and painted to match the same
color as the main residential structure.
• Chimneys shall incorporate one of the following elements.

1. Metal or copper chimney cap. If metal, the chimney
cap shall be pre-finished or painted to match the
requirements of standard §A.6.

2. Chimney hood protecting the chimney opening.

3. Chimney ledge with the ledge projecting ¾-inch
minimum.

4. Chimney cornice.
b. Exterior stairs and ramps that connect the site and walkways to the interior floor level shall comply with all of the following standards. • Exterior stair railings shall utilize one of the following materials.

1. Metal, pre-finished or painted per the requirements
of §A.6.

2. Mild steel or wrought iron, pre-finished or painted
per the requirements of §A.6.

3. Wood or cement fiber with a wood grain finish,
painted or stained per the requirements of §A.6.
• Treads and risers shall be constructed of one or more of the following materials.

1. Brick.

2. Standard gray or colored concrete.

3. Pavers and tiles.

4. Wood, painted or stained per the requirements of
§A.6. or pre-finished composite wood to match the
requirements of §A.6.

Select all
that apply:
39 39 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
35 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.6.2 Building components and details. Buildings and structures shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following components and details. a. Battered or sloping foundation.
b. Brackets and knee braces under ridge lines, eaves, and overhangs, either wood, plain, or decorative.
c. Edging at jambs and heads utilizing wood or composite material that simulates wood.
d. Door, paneled, pre-finished, natural, or painted.
e. Dormers, gabled or shed.
f. Entry door that is either wood paneled, pre-finished, or natural, with glazing a minimum of one square foot in area and a minimum of one sidelite.
g. Porch supports utilizing columns above brick, river rock or cobble, or rough stone or masonry piers.
h. Rafters, rafter tails, or false rafters under eaves or projecting beyond eaves with plain or decorative tails.
i. Roof beams under roof ridges and rakes.
j. Roof planes, multiple.
k. Trellised porch or porte-cochere.
l. Window garden boxes.
3A.6.3 Visible exterior lighting, shell and casing material. The shell and casing of exterior lighting fixtures with visible light sources shall utilize one of the following materials.
a. Metal, mild steel, or wrought iron, painted per the requirements of §B.6.
b. Copper or oil-rubbed bronze, naturally finished.
c. Wood, painted or stained per the requirements of §A.6. d. Engineered polymer, painted per the requirements of §A.6.

Gabled dormers and a river rock chimney with a chimney cap add additional detail to the building. See standards 3A.6.1 and 3A.6.2.

Select at
least three
options:

Select
one (if
applicable):
40 40 of 127
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
36 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group A 3A.6 BUILDING COLORS
3A.6.1 Roof color. Roof colors and materials, when visible from a street, shall match one of the following.
#7494AA #B5545B #D6A373 #58331F #7698A4 #764E49
#789DBF #58331F #A9B397 #C2BCA8 #C7D0C2 #AAACA9
#FFFBF2 #BAC8C8 #E5D6B9 #C2AD9A #B2B7A3 #D5A97A
#EFE7DB #AEBAC6 #E2D0BA #AC836B #9C9D87 #94613D
#CAC5B8 #8597A0 #C9BBA3 #C19080 #8E8D71 #6B4E3E
#BAAF96 #707A80 #C8A979 #886E54 #8A8160 #63615E
#A19E91 #C09D77 #405554 #5E6A57 #6C6A57 #51626C
#A98C71 #3F4740 #425940
#386067 #32373A #373939 #41332F #41332F #47423A
#6C6A57 #3F4740 #C09D77 #A98C71 #886E54 #FFFBF2
#EFE7DB #E5D6B9 #E2D0BA #C9BBA3 #C8A979
#6F767C #916856 #716C69 #A1897C #716C69
3A.6.2 Balcony railings, porch railings, and exterior stair and ramp railings. Select one color per the palette below for balcony railings, porch railings, and exterior stair railings.
3A.6.3 Form Group A colors. A maximum of four colors may be utilized for primary walls, accent materials, windows, doors, gutters, trellises, porch columns, exterior lighting, exterior stair treads and risers, chimneys, and rafter tails, from the palette below.

The following colors are annotated with a HEX color code. Applicants shall use the HEX color code to identify the paint name and number from their chosen paint manufacturer that most similarly matches each of the selected colors in this section.

Paint manufacturers can match colors to a provided HEX color code. All colors are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.
41 41 of 127
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable
37 3B.1.1 Roofs, allowed types. Utilize at least one of the following roof types. All other roof types are prohibited.
a. Gabled.
b. Cross-gabled.
c. Hipped.
d. Cross-hipped.
e. Flat, not to exceed 20 percent of the total roof area. 3B.1.2 Roof Material. Provide one of the following materials. a. Spanish, Pantile, Mission, or Roman terracotta tile; straight or tapered barrel.
b. Plain concrete tile.
3B.1.3 Roof pitch. Roof pitches shall be a minimum 2:12 slope and a maximum 4:12 slope.
3B.1.4 Optional: roof rake. If provided, roof rakes shall be a maximum of 12 inches in height and horizontally project no more than six inches inclusive of the rake tile.
3B.1.5 Optional: roof eave. If provided, eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of six inches and a maximum of 12 inches, measured from the edge of the exterior wall to the edge of the eave.

Select at
least one
option:

Select
only one
option:

FORM GROUP B STANDARDS
Applicant
Name:

Email:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:

Southern California Spanish Revival and Mediterranean Style Characteristics 42 42 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

Select one
option:

Select all
that apply:
43 43 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
39 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.3 EXTERIOR OPENINGS
3B.3.1 Exterior openings: percentage of wall. Exterior openings on building walls with the same orientation, inclusive of doors and windows, shall be a minimum of 15 percent and a maximum of 30 percent.
3B.3.2 Exterior opening types. Provide a minimum of two exterior opening sizes, inclusive of doors and windows.
3B.3.3 Exterior opening shapes. Openings shall be rectangular, square, segmental arch, and/or round arch in shape.

Window Surround Dimension
Apron 3 inches min.

Head 3 inches min.

Jamb 3 inches min.
3B.3.4 Exterior opening surrounds. Opening surrounds, when provided at the exterior, shall comply with the dimensions per the table below. 3B.3.5 Exterior opening materials. With the exception of the front door, provide one of the following exterior opening materials.
a. Wood, pre-finished, stained, or painted per the color requirements of §B.6.
b. Metal-clad wood, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §B.6.
c. Steel, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §B.6. d. Composite, acrylic, or fiberglass set a minimum of two inches inward from the adjacent exterior surface and finished per the color requirements of §B.6.

Double-hung window. See standard 3B.3.5.

Select one
option:
44 44 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
40 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.3.6 Window types. Provide at least one and a maximum of two of the following window types.
a. Casement.
b. Double-hung.
c. Fixed.
d. Ganged casement or double-hung windows.

If casement windows are utilized, double-hung windows are prohibited. If double hung windows are utilized, casement windows are prohibited. 3B.3.7 Optional: window recess. Windows shall be recessed at the sill, jamb, and header of the window a minimum of two inches from the adjoining surface.

Window sills, edging of jambs and headers established by cast stone or plaster are permitted to establish the recess but shall surround all sides of the window.
3B.3.8 Window sashes, rails, and stiles. Window sashes, rails, and stiles shall be a minimum of two inches wide (jambs) or two inches high (sills or heads). 3B.3.9 Optional: window muntins, mullions, and sticking. If windows that include muntins, mullions, and/or sticking are provided, they shall incorporate full sticking establishing true divided glazing and have a minimum ½-inch profile.

Simulated sticking is prohibited. Snap on and/or between glass muntins is also prohibited.
3B.3.10 Door leaves. Provide no more than two contiguous door leaves. 3B.3.11 Door recess. Doors shall be recessed a minimum of two inches, measured from the face of the door to the face of the surround or adjoining building wall.
3B.3.12 Optional: transoms and sidelites. If provided, the maximum width of sidelites shall be half the width of the door. Transom windows shall not extend beyond the door or sidelite edges, and shall not exceed 18 inches in height. 3B.3.13 Door location. Doors shall be placed in one of the following locations. a. Doors are centered within balconies and arches.
b. Doors are a minimum 18 inches distant from a wall or balcony edge.

Select 1-2
options:

Select one
option:
45 45 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
41 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.4.1 Entry element. Provide two or more of the following entry elements. a. Street-facing entries placed either at grade or a maximum 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade shall comply with at least one of the following.
i. Recessed a minimum of two feet from a building plane that faces a street.
ii. Framed by an arched or segmented arched opening(s). iii. Incorporated into a projecting minor mass that does not exceed the eave line by more than three feet or a tower element that does not exceed the otherwise allowed height limit.
b. An entry path no greater than five feet in width shall connect at least one street to the primary residential entry. Within ten feet of the entry, the path may exceed this width but shall not exceed in this area adjacent to the entry a width of more than eight feet. The entry path shall incorporate one or more of the following materials. i. Colored and scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
ii. Scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
iii. Concrete or stone pavers no larger than 30 inches by 30 inches.
iv. Brick used as a uniform or as an accent material.
c. Porches with columns and/or piers, comprising all of the following standards.
• Porches shall make up a maximum of 80 percent of the
primary frontage.
• Porch depth shall be a minimum of five feet and a maximum of ten feet.
• Columns shall be spaced at a minimum eight feet on center. d. Arcade with arches or segmented arches, comprising all of the following standards.
• Arcades shall make up a maximum of 80 percent of the
primary frontage.
• Arcade depth shall be a minimum of five feet and a
maximum of ten feet.
3B.4 ENTRY ELEMENTS
Select at
least two
options:
46 46 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
42 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.4.2 Fences and wall materials. Fences and walls adjoining streets shall be constructed of the following materials or any combination of the following materials.
a. Wood, stained or painted per the requirements in §B.6. b. Stucco or stucco plaster, integrally colored or painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
c. Stone, face stone, and/or veneer stone.
d. Mild steel or wrought iron pre-finished or painted per the requirements of §B.6.

Entry porch. See standard 3B.4.1.

Stucco fence along the street frontage. See standard 3B.4.2.

Select all
that apply:
47 47 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
43 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.5 BUILDING ELEMENTS AND DETAILS
3B.5.1 Optional: building elements. If the following building elements are incorporated into a design, they shall meet the following criteria. a. Chimneys, utilizing one of the following materials.
i. Brick, naturally fired or painted to match the same color as the main residential structure.
ii. Metal or copper chimney cap. If metal, the chimney cap shall be pre-finished or painted to match the requirements of standard B.5.2.b.
iii. Stucco, painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
b. Exterior stairs and ramps that connect the site and walkways to the interior floor level shall comply with all of the following standards. • Exterior stair railings shall utilize one of the following materials.

1. Metal, pre-finished or painted per the requirements
of §B.6.

2. Mild or wrought iron, pre-finished or painted per
the requirements of §B.6.

3. Wood, painted or stained per the requirements of
§B.6.
• Treads and risers shall be constructed of one or more of the following materials.

1. Brick.

2. Standard gray or colored concrete.

3. Pavers and tiles meeting the criteria of standard
B.4.1.b.

A stucco chimney. See standard 3B.5.1.

Select all
that apply:
48 48 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
44 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.5.2 Building components and details. Buildings and structures shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following architectural details. a. Fabric awnings above openings with a maximum five-foot horizontal projection, colored per the requirements of §B.6.
b. Brackets under eaves and overhangs, either wood, metal, or engineered polymer.
c. Chimney caps utilizing at least one of the following. i. Stucco or brick coping cap the same length and depth as the chimney.
ii. Stucco or brick cornice and cap no more than 16 inches in height and projecting no more than three inches.
iii. Inward inclining or stepped back and inward from the face of the chimney stucco or brick cap no more than 30 inches in height.
iv. Terracotta clay chimney pots.
d. Corner and prick posts supporting the roof of a porch, arcade, or gallery made of wood that is either plain and cased, pre-finished, or painted per the color requirements of §B.6.
e. Decorative shutters, painted per the color requirements in §B.6. f. Edging at jambs and heads of one or more openings facing streets utilizing cast stone, columns, patterned ceramic tiles, terracotta tiles, painted wood, pilasters, or stonework.
g. Wood door designed with panels or paneled with true divide glazing. h. Wall or gable vents utilizing one of the following materials. i. Masonry or stone wall vents.
ii. Mild steel or wrought iron vents.
iii. Terracotta clay cylinder vents.
iv. Wrought iron grills, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements in §B.6.

Wall vents add a detailed component to the building. See standard 3B.5.2.

Select at
least three
options:
3B.5.2 continues on the next page.
49 49 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
45 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B i. Porte-cochere projecting across a driveway for vehicles to pass through, architecturally treated to meet the form group standards of the primary structure by implementing at least one of the following components.
i. Consistent use of roof forms and if sloped, roof materials and colors.
ii. Consistent use of facade materials.
iii. Consistent use of primary wall colors.
j. Prefinished or painted rafters, rafter tails, or false rafters at eaves with plain or decorative tails.
k. Shutters, solid cased or louvered and proportioned to fully cover the adjacent opening, pre-finished or painted.
l. Oriel window, no more than one on a street-facing elevation. m. Window muntins, mullions, and sticking that comply with standard B.3.8.
n. Window grilles on a minimum of two street-facing openings, either natural, pre-finished, or painted wood spindlework grilles, or painted mild steel or wrought iron grilles.
o. Wingwall facing a street, matching the primary material, and with an arcaded or opening element.
3B.5.3 Visible exterior lighting, shell and casing material. The shell and casing of exterior lighting fixtures with visible light sources shall utilize one of the following materials.
a. Metal, mild steel or wrought iron, painted per the requirements of §B.6.
b. Copper or oil-rubbed bronze, naturally finished.

Metal exterior lighting attached to the wall. See standard 3B.5.3. 50 50 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
46 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.6.1 Roof color. Roof colors and materials, when visible from a street, shall match one of the following. Flat roofing including built up roofs and membrane roofs shall match the colors of this standard or the colors of standard B.6.2., with the exception of #FFF8F5 and #FFFFFF.
3B.6 BUILDING COLORS
#FFF8F5 #EBE6D5 #EDE8DE #E8E2D8 #E8DED4
#EBDFCD #F2E0D2 #E1D9C9 #DFD3BF #D5D2CB
#E1DDD0 #E6D6C4 #EAE5DB #EFE1D1 #ECDED7
#D5CEC3 #E8DBD2 #DDD2C2 #FFFFFF
#B2665D #916856 #88837E #C16242 #B2665D #88837E
#594f48 #32373A #373939 #41332F #47423A
3B.6.2 Primary colors. Primary walls, chimneys, walls, and parapets adjoining exterior stairs or ramps providing access to the interior shall match one of the following colors. No more than two primary colors shall be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site.
3B.6.3 Gutters, railings, and fixed exterior fixtures. Gutters, downspouts, railings, decorative metal components, and fixed exterior fixtures shall match the colors of this standard or the adjoining primary wall color as allowed in standard B.6.2.

Paint manufacturers can match colors to a provided HEX color code. All colors are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.
51 51 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
47 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group B 3B.6.4 Accent colors. Accent colors at windows, doors, shutters, columns, rafters, awnings, and guard rails shall match either the colors selected in standard B.6.2. or selected from the colors of this standard. No more than two accent colors may be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site. #E6DCD1 #D6D0BF #BDB6AA #BCA595 #9C8978 #545049
#989683 #5A5343 #827A6E #AFA08D #67533D #4C3C31
#666C67 #9C6D4C #564638 #7A473A #57392D #5A392D
#95B2A7 #758579 #6C937F #91281D #8E453A #622F2D
#3A8B80 #2E6964 #006D5F #4E6E65 #96A07E #64684D
#5E6C74 #4E7186 #4B626E #2C4F44 #4F676A #4E4246
#53879F #4D7AAE #445162 #3E5062 #3C474C #3C4450
#007781 #386067 #F8AE38 #D19331
52 52 of 127
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
48 APPLICANT INFORMATION
Proposed
Project Name:

The following design standards are for single-family and two-family residential projects that have selected Form Group C. For more information on Form Group C, see Section 1.4: Form Group Style Guide.

Applicant
Name:

Email:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable
3C.1 ROOFS
3C.1.1 Roofs, allowed types. Utilize at least one of the following roof types. All other roof types are prohibited.
a. Front-gabled, with straight and/or curved edges.
b. Cross-gabled, with straight and/or curved edges.
c. Clipped-gabled.
d. Conical.
e. Hexagonal, for tower elements only.
f. Hipped.
3C.1.2 Roof material. Provide one of the following roof materials. a. Composite shingles and tiles that simulate shake and slate. b. Concrete tiles.
c. Slate tiles.
d. Synthetic shake roofing.
e. Three-dimensional architectural asphalt shingles.
3C.1.3 Roof pitch. Roof pitches shall be a minimum of 5:12 and a maximum of 12:12. 3C.1.4 Roof rake. Measured from the roof form to the exterior wall, rakes shall horizontally project a maximum of 12 inches.
3C.1.5 Roof eave. Eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of six inches and a maximum of 18 inches, measured from the edge of the exterior wall to the edge of the roof tile.

Select at
least one
option:

Select one
option:

To demonstrate compliance with the design
standards, project applicants must fill out the
Applicant Information form to the right and
the Applicant Checklist for all standards in this
chapter by checking “compliant” or “not applicable”
as appropriate and indicating the project sheet
number that the information pertaining to the
standard can be found. This chapter shall be
included in the application submittal package. If
the applicant requires additional space to further
explain or illustrate compliance to a standard,
attachments may also be submitted along with the
Checklist. For more information on the checklists
and City review, see Chapter 1: Introduction.

FORM GROUP C STANDARDS
Tudor, English Cottage, French Cottage, Norman, Storybook Style Influences 53 53 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
49 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Provide at least one of the following materials/finishes for primary walls.
a. Brick.
b. Wood or fiber cement lap siding
c. Wood or fiber cement shingles.
d. Natural finish stucco, or a pigmented and painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes.
i. 16/20 Medium Sand Float finish.
ii. 20/30 Fine Sand Float finish.
iii. 16/20 Heavy Sand Float finish.
iv. Briar finish.
v. Cat face finish.
vi. Light Dash finish.
vii. Medium Dash finish.

Heavy Dash finish.
viii. Tunnel Dash Finish.
ix. Knockdown Dash finish.
x. English finish.
xi. Glacier finish.
xii.Light Lace finish.
xiii. Heavy Lace finish.
xiv. Sand/float 20/30 finish.
xv. Santa Barbara finish.
xvi. Smooth finish.
xvii. Wet Groove Plaster finish.
e. Stone or stone veneer.
3C.2.2 Secondary wall material. Provide a secondary wall material utilizing the materials noted in standard C.3.1 that does not exceed 50 percent of the total wall area of any structure. Notwithstanding this standard, only one stucco finish may be utilized.
3C.2 WALLS
Cross-gable and conical roofs. See standard 3C.1.1.

Select at
least one
option:
54 54 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
50 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.3.1 Exterior openings: percentage of wall. Exterior openings on all building walls, inclusive of doors and windows, shall be a minimum of 15 percent and a maximum of 30 percent.
3C.3.2 Exterior opening types. Provide a minimum of three distinct exterior opening sizes, inclusive of doors and windows.
3C.3.3 Exterior opening shapes. Openings shall be rectangular, segmental arch, or pointed arch in shape.
3C.3.4 Exterior opening surrounds. Opening surrounds, when provided at exterior openings at heads, jambs, and sills, shall comply with the dimensions per the table below.
3C.3 EXTERIOR OPENINGS
Window Surround Dimension
Apron 4 inches min.

Head 4 inches min.

Jamb 4 inches min.
3C.3.5 Exterior opening materials. With the exception of the front door, provide one of the following exterior opening materials.
a. Wood, pre-finished, stained, or painted per the color requirements of §C.6.
b. Metal-clad wood, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §C.6.
c. Steel, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §C.6. d. Composite, acrylic, or fiberglass set a minimum of two inches inward from the adjacent exterior surface and finished per the color requirements of §C.6.
e. Window types. Provide at least one and a maximum of two of the following window types.

Wood-framed window. See standard 3C.3.5.

Select one
option:
55 55 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
51 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.3.6 Window types. Provide at least one and a maximum of two of the following window types.
a. Casement.
b. Single-hung.
c. Double-hung.
d. Fixed.
e. Ganged, with a maximum three windows either fixed all across, casement all across, or casement sandwiched by fixed.

Ganged and double-hung windows. See standard 3C.3.6.
3C.3.7 Window recess. Not applicable.
3C.3.8 Window sashes, rails, and stiles. Window rails and stiles shall be a minimum of two inches in height or width.
3C.3.9 Window muntins, mullions, and sticking. Window muntins, mullions, and sticking shall comply with all of the following standards. • Sticking and muntins that divide windows shall be a minimum of ¾-inch in profile. Simulated sticking and snap on or between glass muntins is prohibited.
• If provided, multipane windows shall incorporate one of the following patterns.
i. Fully divided with orthogonal sticking with a minimum of four divides per sash.
ii. Lattice/diamond sticking.
3C.3.10 Door leaves. Provide no more than two contiguous door leaves. 3C.3.11 Door recess. Not applicable.

Select 1-2
options:
56 56 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
52 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.4.1 Entry element. Provide two or more of the following entry elements. a. Street-facing entries placed either at grade or a maximum 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade shall comply with at least one of the following.
i. Recessed a minimum of two feet from a building plane that faces a street.
ii. Framed by an arched or segmented arched opening(s). iii. Incorporated into a projecting minor mass that does not exceed the eave line by more than three feet or a tower element that does not exceed the otherwise allowed height limit.
iv. Entry accessed by exterior stairs.
b. An entry path no greater than five feet in width shall connect at least one street to the primary residential entry. Within ten feet of the entry, the path may exceed this width but shall not exceed in this area adjacent to the entry a width of more than eight feet. The entry path shall incorporate one or more of the following materials. i. Colored and scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
ii. Scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
iii. Concrete or stone pavers no larger than 30 inches by 30 inches.
iv. Brick used as a uniform or as an accent material.
c. Porches with columns and/or piers, comprising all of the following standards.
• Porches shall make up a maximum of 60 percent of the
primary frontage.
• Columns shall be one of the following shapes.

1. H-column.

2. I-beam.

3. Square.
• Columns shall be wood, stained or painted per the
requirements in §C.6.
d. Roof overhangs comprising all of the following standards. • Overhangs shall provide a minimum horizontal projection of three feet.
• Overhangs may be supported by brackets.
e. Trellises, either stained, natural, or painted per the requirements in §C.6.
3C.4 ENTRY ELEMENTS
Select at
least 2
options:
57 57 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
53 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.4.2 Fences and wall materials. Fences and walls adjoining streets shall be constructed of the following materials or any combination of the following materials.
a. Wood, stained or painted per the requirements in §A.6. b. Stucco or stucco plaster, integrally colored or painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
c. Brick.
d. Stone, face stone, and/or veneer stone.

Recessed, street-facing entry. See standard 3C.4.1.
3C.5 BUILDING ELEMENTS AND DETAILS
3C.5.1 Optional building element: exterior stairs and ramps. If exterior stairs and ramps connect site and walkways to the interior floor level, they shall meet the following criteria.
• Exterior stair railings shall utilize one of the following materials. i. Metal, pre-finished or painted per the requirements of §C.6. ii. Mild or wrought iron, pre-finished or painted per the requirements of §C.6.
iii. Wood, painted or stained per the requirements of §C.6. • Treads and risers shall be constructed of one or more of the following materials.
i. Brick.
ii. Standard gray or colored concrete.
iii. Pavers and tiles meeting the criteria of standard C.4.1.b. 58 58 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
54 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.5.2 Building components and details. Buildings and structures shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following components and details. a. Brackets and knee braces under ridge lines, eaves, and overhangs, either wood, plain, or decorative.
b. Chimneys, utilizing one of the following materials.
i. Brick, naturally fired or painted to match the same color as the main residential structure.
ii. River rock or rounded cobbles.
iii. Stucco, painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
c. Chimney caps utilizing at least one of the following components. i. Chimney hood protecting the chimney opening.
ii. Chimney ledge, with the ledge projecting ¾-inches
minimum.
iii. Chimney cornice.
iv. Metal or copper chimney cap. If metal, the chimney cap shall be pre-finished or painted to match the requirements of standard C.5.2.b.
v. Terracotta clay chimney pots.
vi. Stucco or brick coping cap the same length and depth as the chimney.
vii.Stucco or brick cornice no more than 16 inches in height and projecting no more than three inches.
d. Corner and prick posts supporting the roof of a porch, arcade, or gallery, made of wood that is either plain and cased, pre-finished, or painted per the color requirements of §C.6.
e. Diamond pattern divided windows.
f. Dormers, gabled or shed.
g. Edging that is either wood, fiber cement, cast stone, ceramic tiles, terracotta tiles, or stone.
h. Wood entry door, either pre-finished or painted per the requirements of §C.6., with glazing that is at least one square foot in area. i. Half-timbering.
j. Oriel or bay window, no more than one on a street-facing elevation. k. Entry porch utilizing posts or columns.
l. Porte-cochere that matches the architecture of the primary building. m. Roof planes, multiple.
n. Tower element with the top of the tower not to exceed the highest ridgeline.

Select at
least 3
options:
59 59 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
55 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.5.3 Visible exterior lighting, shell and casing material. The shell and casing of exterior lighting fixtures with visible light sources shall utilize one of the following materials.
a. Metal, mild steel or wrought iron, painted per the requirements of §C.6.
b. Copper or oil-rubbed bronze, naturally finished.

Tower element with half timbering. See standard 3C.5.2.

Metal shell and casing on exterior lighting. See standard 3C.5.3.

Select one
option:
60 60 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
56 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group C 3C.6 BUILDING COLORS
3C.6.1 Roof color. Roof colors and materials, when visible from a street, shall match one of the following.
#DCBE9F #F0F2F1 #EAE9DF #F2F1EC #E5D7BC
#614737 #CBC4B4 #ACB2A7 #804A49 #8D5139
#656469 #64595C #4A3435 #8B7369 #B9B6A3
#685C4C #9E9D95 #B69C7B #716C69
#594f48 #32373A #373939 #41332F
#392318 #A2B494 #626060 #71857F #B2C5A1 #D26455
#5B794F #737B64 #585A63 #AE4658 #9E4755 #BA8D72
3C.6.2 Primary colors. Primary walls, chimneys, walls, and parapets adjoining exterior stairs or ramps providing access to the interior shall match one of the following colors. No more than two primary colors shall be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site.
3C.6.3 Gutters, railings, and fixed exterior fixtures. Gutters, downspouts, railings, decorative metal components, and fixed exterior fixtures shall match the colors of this standard or the adjoining primary wall color as allowed in standard C.6.2.
3C.6.4 Accent colors. Accent colors at windows, doors, shutters, columns, rafters, and guard rails shall match the colors of this standard. No more than two accent colors may be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site.

Paint manufacturers can match colors to a provided HEX color code. All colors are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.
61 61 of 127
DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
57 T O C

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Proposed
Project Name:

The following design standards are for single-family and two-family residential projects that have selected Form Group D. For more information on Form Group D, see Section 1.4: Form Group Style Guide.

Applicant
Name:

Email:

Project
Address:

Project
APN(s):

Date:

Phone:
3D.1 ROOFS
3D.1.1 Roofs, allowed types. Utilize at least one of the following roof types. All other roof types are prohibited.
a. Gabled.
b. Cross-gabled.
c. Hipped.
d. Shed.
e. Flat.
3D.1.2 Roof material. Provide one of the following roof materials. a. Flat roofs only: built-up roofing with pea gravel ballast. b. Flat roofs only: single-ply roofing that meets the color requirements of §D.6.
c. Composite shingles and tiles that simulate slate and concrete. d. Concrete tiles.
e. Metal roofing and standing seam metal roofing.
f. Slate shingle tile.
*C=Compliance; N/C=Non-Compliance; N/A=Not Applicable
Select at
least one
option:

Select one
option:

FORM GROUP D STANDARDS
Ranch, Minimal Traditional, Mid-20th-Century, and Contemporary Style Characteristics 62 62 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
58 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D A 2:!2 sloped roof. See standard 3D.1.3.

Hipped metal roofing. See standards 3D.1.1 and 3D.1.2.
3D.1.3 Roof pitch. Roof pitches shall be a minimum 2:12 slope and maximum 8:12 slope.
3D.1.4 Optional: roof rake. If provided, measured from the exterior wall to the end of the rake, rakes shall horizontally project a minimum of 18 inches and a maximum of three feet.
3D.1.5 Optional: roof eave. If provided, eaves shall horizontally project a minimum of 18 inches.
63 63 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
59 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.2.1 Primary wall materials and finishes. Provide one of the following materials for primary walls.
a. Natural finish stucco, or pigmented or painted stucco utilizing one of the following finishes.
i. Combed finish.
ii. Light Dash finish.
iii. Medium Dash finish.
iv. 16/20 Medium Sand Float finish.
v. 20/30 Fine Sand Float finish.
vi. Santa Barbara finish.
vii.Smooth finish.
b. Wood or fiber cement, horizontally or vertically oriented lap or plank siding, shingles, or board and batten siding.
c. Fiber cement architectural panels with no individually expressed panel larger than 30 inches by five feet in size.
3D.2.2 Optional: secondary wall materials. When a secondary wall material is used, provide no more than one of the following secondary wall materials not to exceed 20 percent of the area of all of the walls facing a single orientation. a. Board-formed gray concrete, natural or stained or painted per the requirements of §D.6.
b. Salt finished concrete, natural or stained or painted per the requirements of §D.6.
c. Wash pebbled concrete, naturally finished.
d. Textured concrete.
e. Brick.
f. Ceramic tile.
g. Stone or veneer stone with a natural finish.
3D.2 WALLS
Brick is provided as a secondary material. See standard 3D.2.2.

Select one
option:

Select one
option:
64 64 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
60 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.3.1 Exterior openings percentage of wall. Exterior openings on building walls with the same orientation, inclusive of doors and windows, shall be a minimum of 15 percent and a maximum of 30 percent.
3D.3.2 Exterior opening types. Provide a minimum of three distinct exterior opening sizes, inclusive of doors and windows.
3D.3.3 Exterior opening shapes. Windows shall be rectangular and/or right trapezoid in shape.
3D.3.4 Exterior opening surrounds. Opening surrounds, when provided at the exterior, shall comply with the dimensions per the table below. 3D.3 EXTERIOR OPENINGS
Window Surround Dimension
Apron 4 inches min.

Head 4 inches min.

Jamb 4 inches min.
3D.3.5 Exterior opening materials. With the exception of the front door, provide one of the following exterior opening materials with clear glazing. a. Wood, pre-finished, stained, or painted per the color requirements of §D.6.
b. Metal-clad wood, pre-finished or painted per the color requirements of §D.6.
c. Metal or steel, clear anodized, oil-rubbed bronze, or pre-finished and painted per the color requirements of §D.6.
d. Composite, acrylic, or fiberglass set a minimum of two inches inward from the adjacent exterior surface and finished per the color requirements of §D.6.

Metal exterior opening window and door frames. See standard 3D.3.5.

Select one
option:
65 65 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
61 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.3.6 Window types. Provide at least one and a maximum of two of the following window types.
a. Awning.
b. Casement.
c. Fixed.
d. Hopper.
e. Sliding.
3D.3.7 Window recess. Not applicable.
3D.3.8 Window muntins, mullions, and sticking. Windows that include muntins, mullions, and/or sticking shall incorporate full sticking establishing true divided glazing. Simulated sticking and snap-on or between glass muntins are prohibited. Snap on and/or between glass muntins is also prohibited.

Sticking, stiles, and muntins that divide windows shall be a minimum of one inch in profile.
3D.3.9 Window sashes, rails, and stiles. Not applicable. 3D.3.10 Door leaves. Not applicable.
3D.3.11 Door recess. Not applicable.
3D.3.12 Optional: transoms and sidelites. If provided, the maximum width of sidelites shall be half the width of the door. Transom windows shall not extend beyond the door or sidelite edges and shall not exceed 18 inches in height. 3D.3.13 Door location. Doors shall be placed off-center in relation to the overall length of the street-facing facade(s) or located on a wall perpendicular to the street-facing facade within a street-facing facade recess.

The entry door is off-center within the recessed facade. See standard 3D.3.13.

Select 1-2
options:
66 66 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
62 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.4.1 Entry element. Provide two or more of the following entry elements. a. Street-facing entries placed either at grade or a maximum 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade shall comply with at least one of the following.
i. Recessed a minimum of two feet from a building plane that faces a street.
ii. Framed by an arched or segmental arched opening(s). iii. Incorporated into a projecting minor mass that does not exceed the eave line by more than three feet or a tower element that does not exceed the otherwise allowed height limit.
b. An entry path no greater than five feet in width shall connect at least one street to the primary residential entry. Within ten feet of the entry, the path may exceed this width but shall not exceed in this area adjacent to the entry a width of more than eight feet. The entry path shall incorporate one or more of the following materials. i. Colored and scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
ii. Scored concrete with score lines placed no more than 30 inches apart.
iii. Concrete or stone pavers no larger than 30 inches by 30 inches.
iv. Brick used as a uniform or as an accent material.
c. Porches with columns and/or piers, comprising all of the following standards.
• Porches shall make up a maximum of 60 percent of the
primary frontage.
• Columns shall be one of the following shapes.

1. H-column.

2. I-beam.

3. Square.
• Columns shall be wood, stained or painted per the
requirements in §D.6.
d. Roof overhangs comprising all of the following standards. • Overhangs shall provide a minimum horizontal projection of three feet.
• Overhangs may be supported by brackets.
e. Trellises, either stained, natural, or painted per the requirements in §D.6.
3D.4 ENTRY ELEMENTS
Select at
least two
options:
67 67 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
63 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.4.2 Fences and wall materials. Fences and walls adjoining streets shall be constructed of the following materials or any combination of the following materials.
a. Wood, stained or painted per the requirements in §D.6. b. Stucco or stucco plaster, integrally colored or painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.

Entry porch with piers. See standard 3D.4.1.

Stucco and wood street-facing wall. See standard 3D.4.2. 68 68 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
64 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.5 BUILDING ELEMENTS AND DETAILS
3D.5.1 Optional: building elements. If the following building elements are incorporated into a design, they shall meet the following criteria. a. Chimneys, utilizing one of the following materials.
i. Brick, naturally fired or painted to match the same color as the main residential structure.
ii. Stucco, painted and matching the same color as the main residential structure.
b. Chimney caps utilizing at least one of the following. i. Chimney caps utilizing at least one of the following. ii. Stucco or brick coping cap the same length and depth as the chimney.
c. Exterior stairs and ramps that connect the site and walkways to the interior floor level shall comply with all of the following standards. • Exterior stair railings shall utilize one of the following materials.

1. Metal, pre-finished or painted per the requirements
of §D.6.

2. Mild steel or wrought iron, pre-finished or painted
per the requirements of §D.6.

3. Wood, painted or stained per the requirements of
§D.6.
• Treads and risers shall be constructed of one or more of the following materials.

4. Brick.

5. Standard gray or colored concrete.

6. Pavers and tiles meeting the criteria of standard
D.4.1.b.

Brick chimney and exterior stairs. See standard 3D.5.1. 69 69 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
65 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.5.2 Building components and details. Buildings and structures shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following architectural details. a. Use of secondary wall material (see standard D.2.2.) at the entry facade and abutting primary entry door.
b. Awnings above openings with a maximum three-foot horizontal projection, colored per the requirements of §D.6.
c. Corner window expression.
d. Entry porch a minimum of five feet in depth inclusive of recesses, under the main roof form.
e. Entry door, paneled, pre-finished, natural, or painted with a minimum of three square feet of glazed area.
f. Roof eaves per the requirements of standard D.1.5.
g. Roof rake per the requirements of standard D.1.4.
h. Roof ridges, a minimum of two distinct heights with a vertical separation between adjoining roof ridges of at least one foot. i. Picture window facing a street, with a minimum of 48 square feet of opening area.
j. Visible exterior lighting, shell and casing material. The shell and casing of exterior lighting fixtures with visible light sources shall utilize one of the following materials.
k. Metal, mild steel or wrought iron, painted per the requirements of §D.6.
l. Copper or oil-rubbed bronze, naturally finished.

Corner window expression. See standard 3D.5.2.
3D.5.3 Visible exterior lighting, shell and casing material. The shell and casing of exterior lighting fixtures with visible light sources shall utilize one of the following materials.
a. Metal, mild steel or wrought iron, painted per the requirements of §D.6.
b. Copper or oil-rubbed bronze, naturally finished.

Select at
least three
options:

Select one
option:
70 70 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
66 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D 3D.6 BUILDING COLORS
3D.6.1 Roof color. Roof colors and materials, when visible from a street, shall match one of the following.
#1C232A #B4CBC1 #F2F1EC #AAABA6 #7A5045
#C8C9BF #D0CBC8 #F8EAD5 #B6A58B #8E96A3
#E7EBEB #C4C5C1 #EEE8D2 #A8926A #EAE3D0
#949693 #989584 #E1E4D1 #ECEDE7 #A4BFD7
#FFFBF2 #EFE7DB #E2E5EC #CCD2DA #E8E2D8
#D5D2CB #E5D6B9 #E1DDD0 #BAC8C8 #BCA595
#BDB6AA #E2D0BA
#716C69 #6B5851 #A7A3A1 #9FA19B #A4A6A1 #9E9784
#7C7B6F #91928C #7C7B6F #A28280 #707480 #958A88
3D.6.2 Primary colors. Primary walls, chimneys, walls, and parapets adjoining exterior stairs or ramps providing access to the interior shall match one of the following colors. No more than two primary colors shall be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site.
3D.6.3 Gutters, railings, and fixed exterior fixtures. Match the adjoining primary wall color (see standard D.6.2) or select one paint color per the options below. #594f48 #32373A #373939 #41332F #47423A #47423A
#A19E91 #6C6A57 #3F4740 #C09D77 #A98C71 #886E54
#FFFBF2 #EFE7DB #E5D6B9 #E2D0BA #C9BBA3 #C8A979
Adjoining
primary wall
color
The following colors are annotated with a HEX color code. Applicants shall use the HEX color code to identify the paint name and number from their chosen paint manufacturer that most similarly matches each of the selected colors in this section.

Paint manufacturers can match colors to a provided HEX color code. All colors are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.
71 71 of 127

CITY USE
ONLY

APPLICANT

CHECKLIST
C N/C N/A N/A C SHEET #
*C=Compliance N/C=Non-Compliance N/A=Not Applicable
67 DRAFT 5/15/26
T O C
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Design Standards: Form Group D #242621 #887FB4 #965355 #2F2F30 #9CAD9A #933942
#0055B6 #45423D #7D6C61 #21211D #8D99A1 #3F4740
#65B3DF #B2B1AC #828380 #70382B #9F5526 #EAB2CB
#BAAF96 #386067 #8597A0 #C2AD9A #91281D #D5A97A
#9C9D87 #3C4450 #707A80 #C9BBA3 #C19080 #63615E
#8E8D71 #5E6A57 #59717C #C8A979 #AD6C56 #764E49
#8A8160 #425940 #51626C #C09D77 #A76152 #A76152
3B.6.4 Accent colors. Accent colors at windows, doors, shutters, columns, rafters, and guard rails shall match the colors of this §D.6.4. No more than two accent colors may be utilized at any individual structure or structures on a lot or site. 72 72 of 127

PLANNING COMMISSION AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JOINT STUDY SESSION

STAFF REPORT
November 19, 2025
Agenda Item No. 6.1
Request: Provide direction on the development of objective design standards for single- and two-family residential projects.

Project Location: Citywide
Prepared By: Community Development Department
Wendy Jung, Principal Planner
(949) 497-0321 | [email protected]
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Planning Commission and Design Review Board receive a presentation and recommendations from City consultant JKA regarding the development of single- and twofamily residential objective design standards, receive public input, and provide direction as appropriate.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On October 8, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to De Novo Planning Group to prepare the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (“CZCU”), a key initiative identified through the City’s 2022 Strategic Planning and 2024 Annual Planning Workshops. In July 2025, the City Council approved a contract amendment to expand the scope of work and prioritize the adoption of objective design standards (“ODS”) for single- and two-family residential projects, as well as updated parking standards. Since that time, De Novo Planning Group and its subconsultants, JKA and Kittelson, have initiated project activities including staff coordination meetings, background research, site visits, parking data collection, and preparation of a public participation plan with project branding and outreach materials.

In response to recent state housing laws limiting the use of subjective design criteria, the City is developing ODS to preserve local design control and ensure new housing is compatible with Laguna Beach’s architectural character. The ODS will be completed in two phases: Phase One will establish objective form and massing parameters such as, height and building setbacks, while Phase Two will expand to include architectural style and character standards for single- and twofamily development, including hillside areas. The November 2025 Joint Study Session with the Attachment 2
73 73 of 127
PC and DRB Joint Study Session Staff Report
November 19, 2025

Page 2 of 4 ends

Planning Commission and Design Review Board will provide an opportunity to review existing conditions, assess neighborhood character, and discuss preliminary recommendations.

Subsequent steps include preparation of an administrative draft of the proposed ODS in early 2026, additional study sessions in the spring, and public hearings in summer 2026 leading to adoption of the final ODS.

BACKGROUND:

Comprehensive Zoning Code Update
On October 8, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to De Novo Planning Group for the preparation of the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update ("CZCU"), a key project identified during the 2022 Strategic Planning and Goal Setting Workshop and as a policy initiative during its 2024 Annual Planning Workshop held on January 19, 2024. On July 22, 2025, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract amendment to revise and expand the scope of services associated with the CZCU. The revised schedule prioritized the adoption of the ODS for singlefamily and two-family residential projects and the updated parking standards. Since then, De Novo Planning Group and subconsultants1JKA and Kittelson have conducted kick-off meetings with staff, researched past documents, conducted site visits throughout the City, collected parking occupancy data during both peak and non-peak periods, prepared a public participation plan, including a logo and branding for the CZCU effort, and collaborated with the CZCU ad hoc committee.

Need for Objective Design Standards
In recent years, the State of California has enacted a series of housing laws aimed at increasing the state’s housing inventory by reducing barriers to housing production. These laws limit a city’s authority to deny certain eligible residential development projects based on standards that are subjective in nature and, instead, requires that such projects be reviewed using objective design standards. Objective design standards are defined under state law as, “standards that involve no personal or subjective judgement by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.” (California Government Code, Section 65913.4.) Some of the City’s design review standards are subjective, which cannot be relied upon to ensure that resulting development is compatible with existing development patterns when the City’s review authority is limited under state law. To preserve local design control and ensure compatibility with Laguna Beach’s architectural character, the City will develop ODS to provide clear, measurable criteria that comply with state law while supporting high-quality design outcomes.

Without these standards, the City’s ability to shape the design of future multi-family, mixed-use, and small-scale residential projects would be limited to existing objective provisions in the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. Establishing ODS will provide a consistent, legally defensible 1 JKA is the subconsultant preparing the ODS, while Kittelson is preparing the draft updates to the City’s parking regulations.
74 74 of 127
PC and DRB Joint Study Session Staff Report
November 19, 2025

Page 3 of 4 ends

framework for project review while maintaining the distinct architectural identity of Laguna Beach neighborhoods.

Two-Phase Approach to Objective Design Standards
The ODS program will be completed in two phases:
• Phase One will focus on form and massing, and establishing maximum height and minimum building setback requirements through a “box inside a box” concept.2 As currently proposed by staff, any development allowed under these standards without design review would be limited to a single story and at a height not to exceed 16 feet, and with greater setbacks than those required by the underlying zone. This phase does not address architectural styles or detailed building design elements. This phased approach will allow the City to more quickly adopt and implement objective design standards. Staff proposes to include the Phase One ODS in the Design Review Efficiency Ordinance • Phase Two, which is the proposed topic of this study session, will expand the ODS to include architectural style and character standards for single- and two-family development, including hillside areas. The standards will be illustrated, user-friendly, and supported by a neighborhood-based architectural style map.

DISCUSSION:

Purpose of the Study Session
The main purpose of this Planning Commission and Design Review Board Joint Study Session is to present an overview and initial recommendations for the development of single- and two-family residential ODS. Specifically, subconsultant JKA will provide a review of relevant documentation, a comprehensive assessment of neighborhood character, analysis of prevailing architectural styles, an overview of their research and analysis of comparable cities undergoing similar development of ODS, and preliminary recommendations for architectural styles. This session plays an essential role for JKA to obtain direction from the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, and the community, and to identify the City's priorities for the development of ODS. The specific key ideas and findings that JKA will be addressing during the study session are provided in the attached deliverable (Task A5.2 of De Novo Planning Group’s scope of work). Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and Design Review Board prepare for the meeting by reviewing the existing conditions report (Attachment 1) in advance.

Next Steps
To advance the project, the following key activities are planned. JKA will prepare an administrative draft of the ODS for internal review, which will include detailed character and style standards 2 The “box inside a box” concept will provide objective design standards that allow a certain form of development. Still, an applicant will have the option to pursue discretionary design review should the applicant want to exceed such allowed form of development. The Phase One ODS have now been drafted and are being presented to the City Council for review and direction on November 18, 2025 as part of a revised draft Design Review Efficiency Ordinance. 75 75 of 127
PC and DRB Joint Study Session Staff Report
November 19, 2025

Page 4 of 4 ends

presented in both illustrative and zoning text formats, along with a checklist and architectural style options. Additional study sessions with decision-makers and the public will be conducted in spring 2026 to review and provide direction on the draft document. Based on input received, a public review draft of the ODS will be developed, incorporating feedback from stakeholders and decisionmakers to further refine the standards and style options. Following this, the ODS will be finalized, integrating public and decision-maker comments to prepare the document for formal adoption.

Two public hearings are anticipated in summer 2026 to present the proposed ODS and gather community input prior to final approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The recommended action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act under CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 because it consists of basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. The recommended action is strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded. Here, the recommended action meets the exemption because the Planning Commission and Design Review Board are providing direction on research, analysis, and preliminary recommendations related to the development of single- and two-family residential ODS, which are informational and planning activities that will not result in any physical changes to the environment.

RECOMMENDATION:

ATTACHMENT:

Attachment 1 – JKA Existing Conditions Report / Presentation 76 76 of 127

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
NOVEMBER 2025
for the development of
Single-Family and Two-Family Residential
Design Standards
Existing
Conditions
Report
Prepared by:

Attachment 3
77 77 of 127
2 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

IN THIS REPORT
1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 3
Objective Design Standards 4
Project Goals 5
Project Timeline 6
Project Applicability 7
2 DOCUMENT OBSERVATIONS 8
Landscape & Scenic Highways Resource Document 9
Historic Resources Element 10
Land Use Element 11
Development Standards 12
Design Guidelines 13
3 PROJECT OBSERVATIONS 14
Exemplary Projects 15
Controversial Projects 16
4 PRECEDENT OBSERVATIONS 17
Precedents 18
5 NEIGHBORHOOD OBSERVATIONS 19
Laguna Beach Neighborhoods 20
1 Downtown Laguna 21
2 North Laguna 22
3 Central Laguna 23
4 Laguna Canyon 24
5 Mystic Hills 25
6 Temple Hills 26
7 Bluebird Canyon 27
8 Diamond Crestview 28
9 Arch Beach Heights 29
10 Portafina 30
11 Top of the World 31
12 South Laguna 32
13 Sycamore Hills 33
Consultant Findings 34
6 “STYLE” / “GROUP” CONSIDERATIONS 35
Arts & Crafts / Shingle / Bungalow 36
Spanish Revival / Monterey 37
Cottage / Storybook / Tudor 38
Period Styles 39
Minimal Traditional with “Style” Overtones 40
“Beach” / Cottage 41
Midcentury / Modern / Post & Beam 42
Contemporary 43
Questions for Discussion 44
78 78 of 127

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 3 TOC PROJECT 1 INTRODUCTION
79 79 of 127
4 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

OBJECTIVE DESIGN

STANDARDS (ODS)
“... standards that involve
no personal or subjective
judgment by a public official
and are uniformly verifiable by
reference to an external and
uniform benchmark or criterion
available and knowable by both
the development applicant or
proponent and the public official
before submittal.”
(California Government Code, Section 65913.4)
• Senate Bill 9: “...a local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards that do not conflict with this section.” • City staff can approve single-family and two-family projects if they comply with one of the defined architectural styles and the ODS associated with the architectural style.
• New homes would still require discretionary approval (CDP process).

DESIGN GUIDELINES DESIGN STANDARDS
• Subjective: open to interpretation and difficult to measure • “Should” statements
• Recommendation, which may/may not be enforced by DRB
• Discretionary project approval process
• Objective: measurable and verifiable
• “Shall” statements
• Requirements, which are enforceable as regulations
• Ministerial project approval process
80 80 of 127
5 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

PROJECT GOALS
• Explore and define Laguna Beach single- and twofamily architectural character on a neighborhood-byneighborhood basis. • Engage with Staff and decision-makers to understand
the expectations and aspirations of single-family and
two-family development in Laguna Beach.
• Prepare objective design standards (ODS) for singlefamily and two-family developments, inclusive of hillside standards.
• PROJECT KICK-OFF
• CITY TOUR WITH STAFF
• ADDITIONAL CITY VISITS & DOCUMENTATION
• EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT
• 11/19 JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION & DESIGN

REVIEW BOARD STUDY SESSION
• TWO ADDITIONAL STUDY SESSIONS WITH DECISIONMAKERS
• TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS
• ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT DESIGN STANDARDS
• PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT DESIGN STANDARDS
• FINAL DESIGN STANDARDS

PROJECT TASKS
81 81 of 127
6 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

PROJECT TIMELINE

SEPTEMBER
2025

OCTOBER
2025

NOVEMBER
2025

DECEMBER
2025

JANUARY
2026

FEBRUARY
2026
MARCH
2026
APRIL
2026
MAY
2026
JUNE
2026
JULY
2026
AUGUST
2026

PROJECT

KICKOFF &

CITY TOUR

JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION
& DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

STUDY SESSION
11/19/2025

DECISION-MAKER

STUDY SESSION
date TBD

DECISION-MAKER

STUDY SESSION
date TBD
Existing Conditions
Report Administrative Draft Design Standards Staff Review Staff Review Public Review
Draft Design
Standards
Final
Design
Standards
Public Hearings
dates TBD
Staff
Review
FALL
2026
Training
dates TBD
82 82 of 127
TOC

PROJECT

APPLICABILITY
7 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
mile SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1
R/HP
Residential Hillside Protection Zone
Laguna Canyon Annexation Area
Specific Plan
Sarah Thurston Park
Specific Plan
Downtown
Specific Plan
Diamond Crestview Specific Plan
Arch Beach Heights Specific Plan
CH-M
Commercial Hotel-Motel Zone
R-1
Residential Low Density Zone
STP
Sarah Thurston Park
R-2
Residential Medium Density Zone
DSP
Downtown Specific Plan
VC
Village Community Zone
R-3
Residential High Density Zone
LBP
Local Business Professional Zone
TAB
Three Arch Bay Zone
LAG
Lagunita Zone
Applicable zones permit singlefamily and two-family dwellings per the existing Laguna Beach
Municipal Code as well projects
permitted under SB 9.
83 83 of 127

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 8 TOC DOCUMENT 2 OBSERVATIONS
84 84 of 127
9 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

LANDSCAPE & SCENIC HIGHWAYS
RESOURCE DOCUMENT (2018)
Laguna Beach General Plan
• 1992-1995: Master Landscape Task Force
developed community-wide landscape
guidelines, working with community residents
to identify residential neighborhoods related
to topography and other visual distinctions
• 2018: Updates to neighborhood character
descriptions, with more detailed site-specific
landscape lists and recommendations
This Existing Conditions Report uses the same
neighborhood areas to organize observations
of architectural character (see Section 5:

Neighborhood Observations).
85 85 of 127
10 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

HISTORIC RESOURCES
ELEMENT (2022)
Laguna Beach General Plan
• Laguna Beach: a “pedestrian community with a unique
village atmosphere and significant aesthetic amenities” • Pre-1927 homes: Craftsman style, those remaining are
Bungalow style
• late 1920s-mid 1930s: Period Revival styles, recreating the architecture of Europe (Spanish Colonial Revival,
Mediterranean Revival, English Tudor Revival)
• Depression: Art Deco, Streamline Moderne, Minimal
Traditional
• Excerpts from a Historic Resources Report from 1980
identify six architectural styles in Laguna Beach:

Craftsman, Bungalow, Beach Cottage, Period Revival,
Moderne, Eclectic
Are the six architectural styles identified in this
Element still relevant in describing Laguna Beach
35 years later?
If Laguna Beach has one-of-a-kind interpretations
of style, how can styles be identified?
• Artist influence in Laguna Beach led to an
individualized architecture: “Laguna Beach
architecture illustrates the personality that results
from one-of-a-kind interpretations of styles, as
well as strong European influences in the desire to
emphasize the village quality.”
86 86 of 127
11 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

LAND USE
ELEMENT (2025)
Laguna Beach General Plan
Related to Community and Single-Family Architectural Character:
• Guiding Principle 5: Preserve the village atmosphere of the downtown, characterized by diverse architectural styles. • Policy 2.1: Maintain the diversity and uniqueness of individual neighborhoods.
• Policy 2.7: Evaluate the impact of proposed development on hillsides and along ridgelines and require building design, location, and arrangement to avoid continuous and intrusive impacts on hillside view areas and skyline profiles.
• Policy 2.8: Require building design and siting to be compatible and integrated with natural topographic features.
• Action 2.10.2: Ensure that the Design Guidelines sufficiently protect public views.

Related to Relevant Process and Procedures:
• Action 2.4.1: Investigate methods to encourage
neighborhoods to establish overlay zones or special
development standards to address neighborhood-specific
development impacts.
• Action 5.1.1: Improve design guidelines and review
procedures to more effectively evaluate development
projects.
• Action 9.4.1: Provide ongoing education to the City
Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review
Board to achieve consistent application, interpretation, and implementation of the zoning standards, General Plan policies, and Design Review Guidelines.

The General Plan envisions Laguna Beach as a place of
abundant scenic and natural beauty, small-town village
charm, and cultural diversity. Ensure that new singlefamily and two-family design standards reflect goals, policies, and actions established in the Land Use Element. 87 87 of 127
12 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS
LBMC Title 25: Zoning
The City shared a matrix summarizing the development
standards for the following zones:
• Residential Low, Medium, and High Density Zones
• Residential Hillside Protection Zone
• Lagunita Zone
• Arch Beach Heights Specific Plan
• Sarah Thurston Park Specific Plan
• Three Arch Bay Zone
• Village Community Zone
• Laguna Canyon Annexation Area Specific Plan
• Diamond Crestview Specific Plan
Development Standards Topic Areas:
• Lot Coverage
• Gross Floor Area
• Setbacks
• Height
• Fences, Hedges, and Walls
• Spaces Between Buildings
• Access
• Parking
• Landscape Open Space
• Chimneys
• Patios, Stairs, Terraces
• Accessory Structures
• Driveways
Are there development standards that should be refined
for single-family projects going through a ministerial
process?
Are there development standards that need to be tailored to reflect particular architectural styles?
88 88 of 127
13 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC DESIGN
GUIDELINES (2010)
The Design Guidelines present an opportunity to convert subjective language into measurable and quantifiable standards that allow for Staff to ministerially approve single-family and twofamily developments in compliance with the design standards. • “Should” vs. “shall”: Design Guidelines are mostly subjective language, “should” statements, that begin to describe Laguna Beach character
• Precedent photos and diagrams supplement the guidelines to illustrate design intent
• Architecture styles are not explicitly described, but neighborhood context is crucial in the selection of style 89 89 of 127

14 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC PROJECT 3 OBSERVATIONS
90 90 of 127
15 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

EXEMPLARY

PROJECTS
*as provided by City Staff
*

GENERAL

FINDINGS
• Broken down massing.
• Varied roof expression.
• Larger overhangs for contemporary
architecture.
• Clear progression between public to semiprivate to private. • Light/beige color tones.
• Darker roof contrast.
• Designed perimeter fencing and walls.
• Second level of detail (i.e. trellises, chimneys,
breakdown of fence elements, bay windows,
etc.).

IRVINE COVE PLACE
• Contemporary with traditional period
style ranch massing
• Broken down massing
• High quality materials/details
• Landscaped retaining walls

BLUEBIRD CANYON DRIVE
• Contemporary Hawaiian Plantation
• Overhangs
• Indoor/outdoor
• Broken massing
• Varied roofline
• Foundation landscape walls

ALTA VISTA WAY
• Contemporary
• Broken down massing
• Vertical stepbacks
• Modest overhangs
• Foundation landscape walls

ASTER STREET
• Contemporary Spanish Revival
• Broken massing
• Varied roofline
• Trellis
• Foundation landscape walls

CRESCENT BAY DRIVE
• Contemporary
• Overhanging eaves
• Broken massing
• Entry element at sidewalk
• Varied materials

CORAL DRIVE
• Contemporary Arts and Crafts Ranch
• Broken massing
• Entry porch and trellis
• Low perimeter wall
• Rake details
91 91 of 127
16 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

CONTROVERSIAL

PROJECTS
*as provided by City Staff
*
• Size, mass, bulk, and setback areas.
• View equity and privacy issues.
• Poor depictions of context and views.
• DRB conversations about aesthetics in controversial project tend to be more about gross development parameters and less about architectural style.

General Findings
92 92 of 127
17 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC PRECEDENT 4 OBSERVATIONS
93 93 of 127
18 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

CITY OF DEL MAR

CALIFORNIA

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

CALIFORNIA

CITY OF CORAL GABLES

FLORIDA
6 single-family zones 3 single-family zones; 1 single-family zone defines front yard & side yard setbacks
lot-by-lot
1 single-family zone with some parcelspecific standards by locale No specific character or style requirement No specific character or style requirement Robust development/design standards with additional architecture standards
Design review for all single-family
developments by a Design Review Board,
plus a required Citizen Participation process
Design review for all single-family
developments by a Planning Commission
Design review for all single-family
developments by a Board of Architects
Allowance for a minor project Administrative
Design Review process
Review allowance for a defined minor
project by a Planning Commission Chair or
Community Development Director
Defined City Architect position
Standards and guidelines for ocean views
from adjoining properties, 360-degree
architecture, privacy/modesty, compatible
colors
Encouragement of character based upon
tradition, context, and historical structures;
but with guidelines that emphasize
distinction from tradition with equal
detailing and materials
Requirement for original design with
Colonial, Venetian, Mediterranean, Italian,
French, Bahamian, or other identifiable style
(local precedents cited)
Availability and required use of a Best
Practices: Single-Family Residences For
Aesthetic Review Manual
94 94 of 127
19 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC NEIGHBORHOOD 5 OBSERVATIONS
95 95 of 127
TOC

LAGUNA BEACH
NEIGHBORHOODS*
*per the Landscape and Scenic Highways Element (2018)
and Downtown Specific Plan area
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
20 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 1 Downtown Laguna 7 Bluebird Canyon
2 North Laguna 8 Diamond Crestview
3 Central Laguna 9 Arch Beach Heights
4 Laguna Canyon 10 Portafina
5 Mystic Hills 11 Top of the World
6 Temple Hills 12 South Laguna
13 Sycamore Hills
mile
0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1
96 96 of 127
21 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC DOWNTOWN 1 LAGUNA*
• Tudor / Cottage Style
• Period Style
• Spanish Revival
• Minimal Traditional

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
Unincorporated
Orange County
North
Laguna
Mystic
Hills
Central
Laguna
Laguna
CanyonBroadway St.

Park Ave.

Forest Ave.

N. Coast Hwy.
3rd St.

Pacific
Ocean
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
*neighborhood boundary inclusive of
the Downtown Specific Plan area
97 97 of 127
22 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC NORTH 2 LAGUNA
• Prairie, but updated
• Minimal Traditional
• Spanish Revival meets Frank Lloyd
Wright-inspired
• Arts and Crafts
• Shingle Style meets Minimal Traditional
• Farmhouse meets Bungalow Arts and
Crafts
• Mid-Century Modern Post and Beam
• Storybook
• Ranch with customizations
• Monterey
IRVINE COVE Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
2G
2G
2A
2A NORTH LAGUNA
2E
2E SUNSET RIDGE
2F
2F SMITHCLIFFS
2C
2C HILLCREST
2D
2D CRESCENT BAY
2B
2B HEISLER
Unincorporated
Orange County
Pacific
Ocean
Downtown
Laguna
N. Coast Hwy.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
98 98 of 127
23 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC CENTRAL 3 LAGUNA
• Modern
• Spanish Revival
• Hand-crafted Mediterranean
• Shingle-Style
• 1930s Period Style
• New England Cottage
• Tudor-Influenced Cottage
• Late Post Modern
• Arts and Crafts / “grandma” Arts and
Crafts
• California “Beach”
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
3A ARROYO CHICO 3G VICTORIA BEACH
3E ROCKLEDGE/LOWER WOODS COVE
3C GAVIOTA 3F UPPER VICTORIA/ALTA VISTA
3D WOODS COVE
3B OAK
3A
3B
3C
3D
3E
3G
3F
Pacific
Ocean
Unincorporated
Orange County
Mystic
Hills
Temple
Hills
Bluebird
Canyon
Diamond
Crestview
South
Laguna
Arch Beach
Heights
Portafina
N. Coast Hwy.

Thalia St.

Calliope St.

Alta Vista Way

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
99 99 of 127
24 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC LAGUNA 4 CANYON
• Farmhouse Arts and Crafts
• Neo Colonial
• Folk Houses National
• Contemporary
• Tudor
• Arts and Crafts with Colonial
• Tudor with French Chateau tendencies
• Brutalist
• Spanish Revival
• Modern
• A-Frame
Unincorporated
Orange County
Unincorporated
Orange County
Downtown
Laguna
Mystic
Hills
Top of the
World
Temple
Hills Bluebird
Canyon
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
4A SARAH THURSTON PARK 4C CASTLE ROCK
4B CANYON ACRES 4D SUN VALLEY
4A
4B
4C
4D Laguna Canyon Rd.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
100
100 of 127
25 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC MYSTIC 5 HILLS
• Contemporary Minimal Traditional
• Contemporary Ranch
• Contemporary
• Shed
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
5A MANZANITA
5B MYSTIC HILLS
Downtown
Laguna
Laguna
Canyon
Temple
Hills
Top of the
World
Central
Laguna
5A
5B Park Ave.

Park Ave.

Skyline Dr.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
101
101 of 127
26 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC TEMPLE 6 HILLS
• Contemporary Ranch
• Minimal Traditional
• Contemporary Prarie
• “Beach”
• Mid Century Modern / Post & Beam
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
6A TEMPLE HILLS
6B RIMROCK
Unincorporated
Orange County
Mystic
Hills
Central
Laguna
Bluebird
Canyon
Diamond
Crestview
Top of the
World
6A
6B
Temple Hills Dr.

Temple Hills Dr.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
102
102 of 127
27 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC BLUEBIRD 7 CANYON
• Suburban late Modern
• Suburban style Minimal Traditional with Bungalow Character • Ranch with Contemporary Expression
• Mid Century Shed
• Mid Century Contemporary
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
7A BLUEBIRD CANYON
7B RANCHO LAGUNA
Unincorporated
Orange County
Diamond
Crestview
Arch Beach
Heights
Temple
Hills
Central
Laguna
Bluebird Canyon Dr.

Morningside Dr.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
7A
7B
103
103 of 127
28 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC Specific Plan Area
DIAMOND 8 CRESTVIEW
• Minimal Traditional
• Modern
• Spanish Revival
• Italianate
• Bungalow
• Mid Century Modern
• New England/Nantucket
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
Arch Beach
Heights
Bluebird
Canyon
Central
Laguna
Inez Dr.

Diamond St.

Crestview Dr.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
104
104 of 127
29 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC Specific Plan Area
ARCH BEACH 9 HEIGHTS
• Post/beam expression
• Minimal Traditional
• Mediterranean/Spanish Revival
• Contemporary architecture reflective of 60s/70s
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
Unincorporated
Orange County
Central
Laguna
Portafina
Diamond
Crestview
Bluebird
Canyon Balboa Ave.

Inez St.

Del Mar Ave.

Alisos Ave.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
105
105 of 127
30 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC 10 PORTAFINA • Contemporary Arts and Crafts
• Mid Century Modern
• Contemporary
• Contemporary Spanish Revival
• Contemporary Minimal Traditional
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
Arch Beach
Heights
Central
Laguna
South
Laguna

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
106
106 of 127
31 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

TOP OF THE
WORLD 11 • “Beach”
• Arts and Crafts
• Contemporary
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
11A TOP OF THE WORLD
Unincorporated
Orange County
Temple
Hills
Bluebird
Canyon
Mystic
Hills
11B OLD TOP OF THE WORLD
11B
11A Alta Laguna Blvd.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
107
107 of 127
32 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC SOUTH
LAGUNA 12 • Minimal Traditional
• Spanish Revival
• Beach inspired
THREE ARCH BAY Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
12A DRIFTWOOD/ALISO 12D 12G
12E
12F
12B
12C

UPPER VILLAGE
ALISO CANYON SOUTH LAGUNA VILLAGE TRACT 849

COAST ROYAL

LAGUNITA/TREASURE ISLAND
Unincorporated
Orange County
Dana
Point
Laguna
Niguel
Portafina
Pacific
Ocean
12A
12B
12C
12D
12E
12F
12G
N. Coast Hwy.

OBSERVED
“STYLES”
108
108 of 127
33 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

SYCAMORE
HILLS 13 • Minimal Traditional / Colonial tendancies
• Technically single-family is permitted, but an already built-out multifamily development
Neighborhood Boundary
Applicable Zoning
Sub-Neighborhood Boundary
Not Applicable Zoning
Aliso Viejo
Laguna
Woods
Laguna
Beach
El Toro Rd.

GENERAL

FINDINGS
109
109 of 127
34 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

CONSULTANT

FINDINGS

1. There was no style
overwhelmingly characteristic to
any neighborhood.

2. Laguna Beach character is the
non-rigorous use of architectural
style.

3. Larger lots in newer hillside
neighborhoods are less “quirky”
and more contemporary.

Consider style “groupings”
with a stylistic framework and
characteristic elements instead
of design standards for pure
architectural styles.

Roofline:

Contemporary Style
Deck:

Midcentury/
Contemporary Style
Entry:

Arts & Crafts / Colonial Style
110
110 of 127
“STYLE” / “GROUP” 6 CONSIDERATIONS
35 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC 111
111 of 127
36 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

ARTS & CRAFTS / SHINGLE / BUNGALOW

CENTRAL LAGUNA CANYON ACRES
112
112 of 127
37 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

SPANISH REVIVAL / MONTEREY

DOWNTOWN LAGUNA DOWNTOWN LAGUNA
113
113 of 127
38 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

COTTAGE / STORYBOOK / TUDOR

WOODS COVE CANYON ACRES
114
114 of 127
39 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

PERIOD STYLES

WOODS COVE DOWNTOWN LAGUNA
115
115 of 127
40 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC MINIMAL TRADITIONAL WITH “STYLE” OVERTONES

WOODS COVE DOWNTOWN LAGUNA
116
116 of 127
41 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC “BEACH” / COTTAGE

CENTRAL LAGUNA CENTRAL LAGUNA NORTH LAGUNA
117
117 of 127
42 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

MIDCENTURY / MODERN / POST & BEAM

NORTH LAGUNA ARCH BEACH HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN
118
118 of 127
43 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

SINGLE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

CONTEMPORARY

WOODS COVE PORTAFINA
119
119 of 127
44 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
SINGLE
-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TOC

QUESTIONS FOR

DISCUSSION

1. Is our understanding of Laguna
Beach architectural character and
style aligned with yours?

2. Are there architectural
characteristics you would like to see
become objective design standards,
or architectural characteristics you
believe should remain subjective?
120
120 of 127
PC Minutes 1 November 19, 2025

THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING
November 19, 2025
A regularly noticed meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Laguna Beach, California, convened at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers on November 19, 2025.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Chairperson Steven Kellenberg, and Commissioners Jorg Dubin, Susan McLintock Whitin, and Ken Sadler.

Chair Tom Gibbs, Board Members Louis Weil, MJ Coveny, and Imer Bauta.

Remote: Pro Tem Jessica Gannon
7974 Melrose Ave.

Los Angeles, CA. 90046
Remote: Chair Pro Tem Steve Goldman
1 Hotel South Beach, Business Center
2341 Collins Ave.

Miami Beach, CA. 33139
Staff Present: Anthony Viera, Deputy Director
Patrick Donegan, Assistant City Attorney
Samantha Beier, Planning Manager
Bill Rodrigues, Planning Manager
Wendy Jung, Principal Planner
Nancy Cardoza, Administrative Assistant
Time of Meeting: Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m.

3. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

3.1 None.

Attachment 4
121
121 of 127
PC Minutes 2 November 19, 2025

4. CONSENT CALENDAR

4.1 September 3, 2025 Draft Minutes

4.2 September 17, 2025 Draft Minutes
Motion: JD Second: KS Action: The Planning Commission approved the above-mentioned Planning Commission Minutes. Motion carried 5-0.

Vote: Goldman _Y Dubin Y Whitin Y Kellenberg Y Sadler _Y_

4.3 Item: General Plan Consistency 25-2296
Location: 1377 Dunning Drive | APN: 644-141-04
Request: The applicant requested a General Plan consistency determination for summary vacation of a City-owned storm drain easement measuring five feet in width and totaling approximately 973 square feet. The easement is located on private property at 1377 Dunning Drive.

Motion: JD Second: KS Action: The Planning Commission approved Resolution 25-2296 found that the potential summary vacation of the City-owned storm drain easement on the property located at 1377 Dunning Drive is consistent with the City’s General Plan and found said action exempt from CEQA. Motion carried 5-0.

Vote: Goldman _Y Dubin Y Whitin Y Kellenberg Y Sadler _Y_

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 None

6. OTHER BUSINESS

6.1 Item: Planning Commission and Design Review Board Joint Study Session Location: Citywide
Request: Provide direction on the development of objective design standards for single- and two-family residential projects.

Staff Presentation: Wendy Jung, Principal Planner, presented a description of the project and staff’s recommendation provided in the report.
122
122 of 127
PC Minutes 3 November 19, 2025
John Kaliski and Amee Bhatt from JKA | John Kaliski Architects presented an overview of the Design Guidelines and Standards outlined in the report.

Questions of Staff: Board Member Bauta asked whether the initial internal review included Board and Planning Commission. Staff replied that it was for staff review only.

He preferred language allowing owners to pursue a future Design Review Board and Planning Commission hearing. Ashley Brodkin, Project Manager with De Novo Planning Group, stated the proposal was one available path and multiple paths remained available, providing an option consistent with State requirements.

Board Member Coveny asked how “style groupings” would be defined for remodels. Staff responded that input from City Council, Board Members, and Commissioners would help refine an approach to improve the process.

Board Member Weil noted some residential plan areas might be missing and asked if the consultants would be open to exploring additional zones and characteristics. John Kaliski confirmed.

Chair Gibbs stated that the Design Review Board’s issues were mass and scale, view equity, and privacy, and asked whether objective standards were being considered. John Kaliski confirmed.

Chair Pro Tem Goldman asked whether the 50% retention rule for non-conforming projects should be evaluated in planning. John Kaliski replied it had not yet been considered but agreed it should be a factor. Ashley Brodkin stated the applicability of the objective design standards was currently focused on new development, not historic designation.

Commissioner Sadler asked whether, once the new process for certain residential projects was developed, anyone could opt for that pathway instead of the regular Design Review process. Staff confirmed and noted that more meetings would be held on this.

Commissioner Whitin asked whether the effort, given the City’s mostly built-out status, was primarily defensive, aimed at clarifying standards and streamlining the process for certain projects. Staff confirmed it was intended to simplify the process.

Chair Kellenberg stated the discussion was broadly framed but focused on a narrow subject—a single track of approval that an applicant could choose—and asked whether it would affect all guidelines Citywide. Staff confirmed.

Chair Gibbs asked whether the expedited application process was not limited to SB 9 (State Bill 9) or ADU (Accessory Dwelling Units) projects and would be available to everyone. Staff confirmed.

Discussion ensued regarding SB9.

Chair Kellenberg opened the public hearing.
123
123 of 127
PC Minutes 4 November 19, 2025
Public Testimony Regarding the Project: Morris Skenderian, Architect, noted that the 2010 Residential Design Guidelines, a 100-page document developed by an Ad Hoc group of designers and architects, had long guided applicants and should be reviewed if it has not been.

Ann Christoph stated the proposal involved far broader impacts and changes to existing practices than merely addressing neighborhood styles.

Penelope Milne, of Canyon Alliance of Neighborhoods Defense Organization, stated that workshops were needed to allow for interactive discussion and additional time to work on the proposal.

A resident objected to SB 9, expressing concern that it infringes upon property ownership rights.

Chair Kellenberg closed the public hearing.

Commissioners Comments: Chair Gibbs stated that objective standards should be developed to provide community protection if an alternative pathway was created for SB 9 and other new construction projects.

Staff replied that The City Council discussed policy-level considerations regarding what the City would do to help ensure the character of residential neighborhoods is maintained, while acknowledging that State laws are regularly adopted that reduce local regulatory control.

Discussion ensued regarding the scope of consultant services.

Board Member Coveny commented on the new SB 9 guidelines.

Chair Kellenberg stated that Laguna Beach is an eclectic community.

Discussion continued regarding the urgency ordinance, which addresses the immediate preservation of public peace, health or safety.

Board Member Weil commented on the Design Review Board’s challenges related to nonconforming conditions.

Commissioner Dubin stated they did not support the creation of additional zones with separate objective standards for each.

Board Member Bauta expressed support for considering architectural styles by location.

Commissioner Sadler requested clarification, asking whether SB 9 prevents the City from imposing stricter restrictions than the underlying zone and staff confirmed. 124
124 of 127
PC Minutes 5 November 19, 2025
Pro Tem Gannon suggested that proposed projects should avoid orienting primary living spaces toward neighboring properties to protect privacy.

Commissioner Whitin asked whether Phase One, “the box within the box,” would return for another meeting or go to the Design Review Board. Staff replied that it would conclude under the current contract.

Discussion ensued regarding future state housing laws.

The Planning Commission and Design Review Board Joint Study Session provided conceptlevel direction.

7. COMMITTEE, COMMISSIONERS, AND STAFF REPORTS

7.1 Staff Reports – None
Commissioners’ Reports – None

8. ADJOURNMENT

8.1 Adjourn – To the regular Planning Commission meeting on December 3, 2025.

Motion: KS Second: JD Action: The Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 8:49 p.m. to the regular Planning Commission meeting on December 3, 2025. Motion carried 5-0.

Vote: Goldman Y Dubin Y Whitin Y Kellenberg Y Sadler Y_ 125
125 of 127
1 McKay, Ann Marie CC
Subject: 5/26/26 Joint Meeting CC, DRB and PC: Please distribute to CC, DRB & PC members.

From: Susan Whitin
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 3:07 PM
To: Beier, Samantha CD <[email protected]>; McKay, Ann Marie CC <[email protected]> Subject: 5/26/26 Joint Meeting CC, DRB and PC: Please distribute to CC, DRB & PC members.

May 26, 2026
Re: Joint Session of the City Council, Design Review Board, and Planning Commission — Objective Design Standards
Dear Mayor, Council Members, Design Review Board Members, and Planning Commissioners:

I am unable to attend the entire meeting and wanted to provide my thoughts regarding the Objective Design Standards submittal.

I confess to approaching this process with a mindset of not wanting Laguna Beach to be hampered by outside agencies requiring a streamlined process through objective design standards. My concern has been that objective standards could gradually reduce Laguna’s wide variety of architectural styles and detailing, which are central to the town’s unique character and identity.

However, after reviewing the material, that does not appear to be the case.

The proposed Objective Design Standards identify a broad range of architectural and detailing options, including an illustrated glossary of terms, within the four identified architectural styles. The checklist format appears to facilitate the process for both applicants and the City. Frankly, with or without the state requirement to create objective design standards, these standards simplify the process for everyone involved while still allowing the City to retain an important degree of regulatory control.

In addition, if a proposed project falls outside the requirements for ministerial approval, the option remains to proceed through the Design Review Board process. That distinction is important and reassuring.

I do have several questions regarding the proposed standards:

1. How did the consultant narrow the previously identified six architectural styles down to the four styles included in the Objective Design Standards?

2. Using the “box within a box” approach, projects without discretionary design review appear limited to a single story, not exceeding 15 feet in height, and subject to increased setbacks beyond the minimum requirements of the underlying zone. How are those increased setbacks calculated?

3. For additions to an existing house where the addition differs in architectural style and color from the existing structure, would the project be required to go through the DRB process?

4. What is the anticipated turnaround time for ministerial approval using the objective standards and checklist format?
126 of 127
2 5. Will project submittals still require building elevations, plans, details, and similar materials as required today? There has also been discussion about requiring a 3-D street-view representation as part of project submittals. Will that become part of the application requirements?

6. Regarding building colors, Section 3A.6 states that all colors must be approved by the Community Development Director. Would this approval requirement be considered subjective?

7. Questions regarding the Form Group Standards:

FORM GROUP A
 Page 38, Section 3A.4.1 — Entry Elements: stamped concrete and stone columns are not identified in the checklist. Are they permitted?
 Page 40, Section 3A.6.1 — Treads/Risers: solid stone stairs are not identified. Are they permitted?

FORM GROUP B
 Page 43, Sections 3B.1.1, 3B.1.2, and 3B.1.3 — Roofs: is a flat roof surrounded by a parapet permitted? If so, could the roofing material consist of built-up roofing or hot-mop roofing? Thank you to the consultants and staff for the considerable work that has gone into preparing these standards and for continuing to balance state requirements with preservation of Laguna Beach’s character.

Regards,
Susan Whitin
127 of 127

Laguna Beach City CouncilMay 26, 2026

Laguna Beach City Council
May 26, 2026