Agenda packet, regular meeting — Laguna Hills City Council, March 28, 2023 (part 3 of 4)

The significant proposed change to the Policy, as directed by the City Council, is that requests for items to be placed on a future agenda for purposes of discussion may, but are no longer required to, be made during the “City Council Member Comments” portion of the City Council agenda. If at least two Council Members agree to have an item placed on a future agenda and both Council Members make a written request to the City Manager by deadline stated in the policy, such item shall be placed under the “Matters Agendized and Presented by City Council Members” portion of the City Council agenda on a future agenda for discussion.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed Resolution amending and restating City Council Policy No. 120 regarding procedures for placing items on a future City Council agenda. For the City Council’s reference, a redline version of City Council Policy No. 120 has also been included as an attachment to this staff report.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Proposed Resolution Amending and Reinstating City Council Policy No. 120 • City Council Policy No. 120 - REDLINED

4.10 Packet Pg. 336
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND
RESTATING CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 120

REGARDING PROCEDURES FOR PLACING ITEMS ON A

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council may establish City Council Policies for providing procedures and guidelines to the City Manager for the administration, operation, and general health, safety, and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted City Council Policy No. 120 on April 14, 2015 to specify a procedure for City Council Members to place items on a future City Council agenda; and
WHEREAS, City Council Policy No. 120 was amended and reinstated by City Council action at the regular meeting of May 8, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make changes to the current procedures as outlined in City Council Policy No. 120.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

SECTION 2: City Council Policy No. 120, currently entitled “Procedures for Council Members to Place Items on a Future City Council Agenda” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

4.10.a
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Amending and Reinstating City Council Policy No. 120 (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS )
I, Jennifer Lee, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Hills, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X adopted by the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

4.10.a
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Amending and Reinstating City Council Policy No. 120 (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy 1 CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
City Council Policy
Subject: Procedures for Placing Items
on a Future City Council
Agenda
Policy No. 120
Effective Date: April 14, 2015
Last Revision: March 28, 2023
PURPOSE:

To establish requirements to place items on a future City Council Agenda.

POLICY:

It shall be a policy of the City of Laguna Hills to follow a prescribed procedure regarding the placement of items on a City Council Agenda by City Council Members.

PROCEDURE:
1) The City Clerk shall assemble a preliminary agenda based on input received from the City Council, Department Heads and the City Manager regarding reports they are preparing for the meeting.
2) All reports and agenda item requests are due to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week in advance of the scheduled meeting. 3) The City Manager and the Mayor shall determine which items are placed on the agenda and the timing for scheduling such items. In the Mayor’s absence, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall act in the Mayor’s place. If there is no agreement on an agenda item between the Mayor, the City Manager, and the initiator, placement and timing shall be at the discretion of the initiator. Council Members may place items on a future agenda, provided at least one other Council Member concurs with the request. All such requests shall be made in writing to the City Manager. If at least two Council Members request to have an item placed on a future agenda, such item shall be placed under the “Matters Agendized and Presented by City Council Members” portion of the City Council agenda on a future agenda for discussion. The timing for the Council Member agenda item shall be at the discretion of the initiating Council Member. 4) At a minimum, the report shall: (1) set forth a subject matter that reasonably describes the issue to be presented for consideration by the City Council; and (2) the report must contain a recommendation if the Council Member desires a specific action to be taken by the City Council at the meeting. Reports may provide background information and Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X
Exhibit A 4.10.a
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Amending and Reinstating City Council Policy No. 120 (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy City Council Policy
No. 120
Council Member Agenda Item Placement Policy
2 attachments or exhibits that they believe will be helpful. Council Members may coordinate with the City Manager for assistance from staff with obtaining copies of existing materials and/or data related to their agenda report. If the staff time request is large, the City Council and City Manager shall determine the staff time to be allocated as an agenda item. 5) If the ultimate action desired includes adoption of an Ordinance or Resolution, then the recommended action in the Agenda Report should include direction to City staff to prepare said Ordinance or Resolution for consideration by the City Council at a future meeting.
6) The City Clerk and the City Manager shall review all reports for grammar, spelling, appearance, and format, ensuring that all supporting materials or documents are attached and complete. All changes shall be approved by the initiator and the initiator shall have the final say.

ATTACHMENTS:
● NONE

4.10.a
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Amending and Reinstating City Council Policy No. 120 (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy 1 CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
City Council Policy
Subject: Procedures for Council
Members to Place Placing Items on a Future
City Council Agenda
Policy No. 120
Effective Date: April 14, 2015
Last Revision: May 8, 2018March 28, 2023
PURPOSE:

To establish requirements for City Council Members to place items on a future City Council Agenda.

POLICY:

It shall be a policy of the City of Laguna Hills to follow a prescribed procedure regarding the placement of items on a City Council Agenda by City Council Members.

PROCEDURE:
1) The City Clerk shall assembles a preliminary agenda based on input she receiveds from the City Council, Department Heads and the City Manager regarding reports they are preparing for the meeting. 2) All reports and agenda item requests are due to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week in advance of the scheduled meeting. 3) The City Manager and the Mayor shall determines which items are placed on the agenda and the timing for scheduling such items. In the Mayor’s absence, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall act in the Mayor’s place. If there is no agreement on an agenda item between the Mayor, the City Manager, and the initiator, placement and timing shall be at the discretion of the initiator. Council Members may place request items be placed on a future agenda for purposes of discussion, provided at least one other Council Member concurs with the request.

All such requests shall be made during the “City Council Member Comments” portion of the City Council agenda in writing to the City Manager. If at least two Council Members, upon consensus, agree to have an item placed on a future agenda, such item shall be placed under the “Matters Agendized and Presented by City Council Members” portion of the City Council agenda on a future agenda for

4.10.b
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: City Council Policy No. 120 - REDLINED (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy No. 120) City Council Policy
No. 120
Council Member Agenda Item Placement Policy
2 discussion. The timing for the Council Member agenda item shall be at the discretion of the initiating Council Member.
4) In accordance with Procedure 3 above, Council Members must submit their report in writing to the City Clerk by the same deadline as stated above. At a minimum, the report shallmust: (1) set forth a subject matter that reasonably describes the issue to be presented for consideration by the City Council; and (2) the report must contain a recommendation if the Council Member desires a specific action to be taken by the City Council at the meeting. Council Members may Reports may provide background information as a part of their report and attachments or exhibits that they believe will be helpful to their presentation and with gaining support for their recommended action.

Council Members may coordinate with the City Manager for may request limited assistance from staff with obtaining copies of existing materials and/or data related to their agenda report., provided said assistance does not require any new work or independent analysis to be performed and in the aggregate, does not require more than onehour of staff time. If the staff time request is large, the City Council and City Manager shall determine the staff time to be allocated as an agenda item.
5) Council Member agenda reports cannot include any Ordinances or Resolutions. If the ultimate action desired includes adoption of an Ordinance or Resolution, then the recommended action in the Agenda Report should include direction to City staff to prepare said Ordinance or Resolution for consideration by the City Council at a future meeting.
6) The City Clerk and the City Manager shall reviews all staff reports for grammar, spelling, appearance, and format, ensuring that all supporting materials or documents are attached and complete. All changes shall be approved by the initiator and the initiator shall have the final say.
7) The City Manager reviews all reports for content, clarity, and recommended action(s), making changes as he deems appropriate and/or making requests for additional information that he believes are necessary to present the Council with a complete report. The City Manager may exercise his sole discretion and judgment in deciding the content and timing of all agenda items, with the exception of reports that are specifically requested by a majority of the City Council or actions that are required by law.

4.10.b
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: City Council Policy No. 120 - REDLINED (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy No. 120) City Council Policy
No. 120
Council Member Agenda Item Placement Policy
3 ATTACHMENTS: ● NONE

4.10.b
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: City Council Policy No. 120 - REDLINED (2023-45 : Amended and Restated City Council Policy No. 120) City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: March 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jarad Hildenbrand
City Manager
ISSUE: Consideration for Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority for General Liability, Property, Workers' Compensation, and Other Insurance Coverage
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the following actions:
1) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EXECUTION OF THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY”; 2) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING POOLING OF SELFINSURANCE THROUGH THE LIABILITY PROTECTION PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY”;
3) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING POOLING OF SELFINSURANCE THROUGH THE PRIMARY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY”;
4) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN CITY VOLUNTEERS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3363.5 OF THE LABOR CODE”;
5) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A POLICY THAT DELEGATES BASIC TORT

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 344
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 2 ends

CLAIM HANDLING OF MINOR CLAIMS TO THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY AS AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 910, ET SEQ”; 6) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement and any related documents;
7) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING FROM MEMBERSHIP IN THE EXCLUSIVE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA”; and
8) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING FROM MEMBERSHIP IN THE WORKERS’

COMPENSATION PROGRAM OF THE SPECIAL DISTRICTS RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY”.

SUMMARY:

The City receives insurance coverage, claims services, and risk management services through participation in the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC) and its insurance partners and workers’ compensation coverage through the Special Districts Risk Management Authority (SDRMA). Due to significant cost increases to the City’s insurance premiums, staff began a due diligence insurance review to identify similar municipal insurance programs that would meet the City’s insurance and risk management needs.

As a result of this review, the City identified the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) as a potential insurance and risk management provider and began its application and underwriting processes. Ultimately, the City received a cost indication of $508,500 for participation in CJPIA’s liability protection program, all-risk property protection program, and other commercial insurance programs. In contrast, ERMAC’s insurance premium for FY 2022-23 was $862,804. In fact, the City’s insurance premiums through ERMAC have risen yearly by an average of 13 percent.

As a result of the due diligence review of each insurance provider’s risk management services, insurance programs, limits, and cost indications, staff recommends participation in the CJPIA based on the organization’s comprehensive risk management strategy, quality and economy of insurance programs, fiscally responsible premiums, extensive employee training academies and programs delivered online and in-person,

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 345
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 3 ends

policy development, contract review, highly qualified and professional staff including a dedicated risk manager, and other impactful services to mitigate the City’s exposures to risk and loss.

BACKGROUND:

Since 2003, the City has been a member of the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC), a joint insurance pool consisting of the Cities of Laguna Hills, Beaumont, Hayward, and Santa Maria. The City participates in various insurance programs through ERMAC and its partner insurance agencies, including General Liability, Property, Employment Practices Liability, Crime Coverage, Cyber Liability, and SDRMA’s Workers’ Compensation Program.

While the City has been satisfied with ERMAC’s insurance programs and services, its insurance premiums have risen dramatically over the years. In 2009, the City’s total cost for insurance with ERMAC was $184,443 compared to $862,804 in 2023, representing an increase of a 4.68 factor over 14 years. Furthermore, in the same timeframe, the City’s total insurance premium has risen yearly by an average of 13 percent. The table below summarizes the City’s annual insurance premiums since joining ERMAC in 2009.

As a result of the significant increases to the City’s insurance premiums year-over-year, staff conducted a detailed review and cost analysis of ERMAC’s insurance programs and related services. The primary goal of this due diligence insurance review was to identify highly-regarded municipal insurance providers that would provide the same, or better,

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 346
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 4 ends

insurance coverages and risk management services at a reduced cost.

After a review of multiple municipal insurance programs, staff identified the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) as the best agency to replace the City’s current insurance programs provided by ERMAC. Accordingly, staff underwent CJPIA’s application and underwriting process to receive a cost indication, including information about each program. The table below summarizes the FY 2023-24 total cost estimate and self-insured retention (SIR) amounts. A self-insured retention requires the insured party to make payments up to and including the established SIR before the insurer makes any payments toward a claim.

FY 2023-24 Annual Insurance Premium Estimates
Agency FY 23-24
Premium Liability SIR WorkersComp SIR
Property
SIR
ERMAC $848,968 $100,000 $0 $10,000
CJPIA $508,500 $0 $0 $10,000
Both cost indications are estimates for the upcoming 2023-24 fiscal year, and final premiums may increase or decrease slightly. However, based on current market conditions, staff does not foresee a substantial variation in either cost indication.

As a result of the due diligence insurance review of each insurance provider’s risk management services, insurance programs, limits, and cost indications, staff recommends participation in the CJPIA based on the organization’s comprehensive risk management strategy, quality and economy of insurance programs, fiscally responsible premiums, extensive employee training academies and programs delivered online and in-person, assistance with policy development and contract review, highly qualified and professional staff including a dedicated risk manager, and other impactful services to mitigate the City’s exposures to risk and loss.

About CJPIA
The CJPIA was established in 1978 and is headquartered in La Palma, California. The agency is one of California's largest municipal self-insurance pools, with an asset portfolio of over $300 million. Furthermore, CJPIA has approximately 123 members throughout California, which includes 97 cities, 20 joint powers authorities, and six special districts.

CJPIA has 17 members from Orange County, including the cities of Aliso Viejo, Dana

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 347
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 5 ends

Point, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Seal Beach, Stanton, Villa Park, and the Orange County Council of Governments, to name a few.

CJPIA’s Board of Directors comprises of one individual from each member organization.

CJPIA also has an Executive Committee, Managers Committee, Finance Officers Committee, and Risk Managers Committee in which the City may participate to direct the organization's programs, services, and direction.

Additional information regarding the CJPIA and details of each insurance program is included in the proceeding sections and the attached CJPIA Cost Indication Report.

Liability Program
As part of the initial Risk Management Evaluation (IRME) process, CJPIA reviewed ten years of the City's liability claims. The IRME found that the City's liability loss history and risk profile are similar to other cities in the CJPIA pool. The scatterplot below summarizes the City’s liability claims over the past ten years.

CJPIA’s liability program has a coverage limit of $50 million per occurrence with no selfinsured retention, reducing the City’s exposure to unforeseen financial loss in the event of a claim. The primary liability program also includes land subsidence coverage with no self-insured retention.

CJPIA’s liability program is consistent with the City's current liability level of coverage.

The graphic below shows the coverage layers for the Primary Liability Program. The CJPIA Pooled Retention Layer, up to $3 million, is funded by annual contributions from members. CJPIA purchases the Reinsurance Level of $3 million to $30 million on behalf

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 348
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 6 ends

of its members for higher levels of coverage. The Excess layer of $30 million to $50 million is purchased by CJPIA from CSAC-EIA for additional coverage, bringing the City's total coverage to $50 million.

Workers’ Compensation Program
As part of the IRME process, the CJPIA reviewed ten years of the City's Workers’ Compensation (WC) claims. The IRME found that the City's WC loss history and risk profile is very low compared to other cities in the CJPIA pool. The scatterplot below depicts the WC claims incurred over the past ten years. The City's proposed SIR limit is $0.

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 349
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 7 ends

The following graphic shows the coverage layers for the WC Program. Members' annual contributions fund the Pooled Retention layer of up to $1 million. The Reinsurance layer of $2 million, up to the statutory limits required by the State of California, is purchased by CJPIA on behalf of its members. The total coverage meets State requirements.

Commercial Insurance Programs
All other insurance options reviewed are through CJPIA's insured programs or Alliant Insurance Services (Alliant). The CJPIA's insured programs represent commercial insurance programs, including property, earthquake, mechanical breakdown, vehicle physical damage, pollution and remediation legal liability, crime, special events, and vendors/contractors. The CJPIA contracts with Alliant Insurance Services to administer the crime insurance program, providing coverage for faithful performance, depositors’ forgery, money and securities crime, and computer fraud. In addition, cyber security coverage is provided under the CJPIA liability program.

The chart below compares insurance program costs between ERMAC and CJPIA for the upcoming fiscal year. While the premiums for both programs are estimates, staff expects the finalized premiums to slightly increase or decrease based on market conditions in the upcoming months.

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 350
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 8 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

Staff’s recommendation to join the CJPIA would provide the City with a cost-savings of approximately $348,468 based on the latest cost-indication from CJPIA. Funds for the City’s insurance programs, approximately $508,500, will be included in the FY 2023-2025 general fund budget.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Proposed Resolution Approving Execution of the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) • Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Liability Protection Program of the CJPIA
• Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving the Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Primary Worker's Compensation Insurance Program of the CJPIA

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 351
Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority March 28, 2023

Page 9 ends

• Proposed Resolution to Provide Workers' Compensation Coverage for Certain City Volunteers Pursuant to the Provisions of Labor Code Section 3363.5 • Proposed Resolution Delegating Tort Liability Claims Handling Responsibilities to the CJPIA as Authorized by Government Code Sections 910, Et Seq • CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement
• CJPIA Bylaws
• Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC) Liability Program • Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Workers' Compensation Program of the Special Districts Risk Management Authority of California

7.1.1 Packet Pg. 352
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EXECUTION

OF THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 990, 990.4, 990.8 and 6500 of the California Government Code, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority ("California JPIA") has been created by a Joint Powers Agreement; and WHEREAS, Joint Protection Programs have been developed by the California JPIA pursuant to the provisions of said Agreement; and WHEREAS, Article 22 of said Agreement provides for additional members to become parties to the Joint Powers Agreement creating the California JPIA and enter one or more Joint Protection Programs providing self-insurance and loss pooling; and WHEREAS, the self-insurance and loss pooling programs of the California JPIA, as well as its group insurance coverage programs, offer significant advantages to the City of Laguna Hills in terms of cost, protection, risk management and loss control advice and assistance, and entering such programs would be in the best interest of the City of Laguna Hills.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the Mayor of the City of Laguna Hills is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of the City of Laguna Hills binding the Member to the terms and conditions of said Agreement. The City of Laguna Hills understands and agrees that, by executing the Agreement, it will be bound by the terms of the Joint Powers Agreement, specifically Article 21, “Responsibilities of Members,” including the obligation to make deposits and deposit adjustments for joint protection programs it joins.

SECTION 2. That the City of Laguna Hills hereby joins the California JPIA, for a period of not less than three (3) years.

SECTION 3. That the City of Laguna Hills acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of Article 24 of the Agreement, which provides:
a) A Member that enters into this Agreement may not withdraw as a party to this Agreement and as a Member of the Authority for a three-year period commencing on the effective date of its membership.

7.1.1.a
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Approving Execution of the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the California Joint Powers Insurance Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

b) A Member that enters into a joint protection program may not withdraw as a participant in that program for a three-year period commencing on the effective date of its participation in the joint protection program. c) After the initial three-year non-cancellable commitment to membership in the Authority or participation in a joint protection program, a Member may withdraw only at the end of any protection period, provided it has given the Authority a twelve-month written notice of its intent to withdraw from this Agreement and/or any joint protection programs in which it participates.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.a
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Approving Execution of the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the California Joint Powers Insurance RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND

APPROVING POOLING OF SELF-INSURANCE THROUGH

THE LIABILITY PROTECTION PROGRAM OF THE

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 6500 et seq. and also Sections 990.4 and 990.8 of the California Government Code, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (“California JPIA”) was created in 1977; and WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills has executed the Joint Powers Agreement to become a member of the California JPIA; and WHEREAS, the California JPIA has established and administered a successful Liability Self-Insurance and Loss Pooling Program since April 1, 1978; and WHEREAS, there are significant financial and administrative advantages for the City of Laguna Hills to participate in the Primary Liability Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Liability coverage for the City of Laguna Hills through the Liability Program of the California JPIA is hereby authorized and directed effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum of Coverage in effect at the time of any occurrence covered by the Memorandum of Coverage.

SECTION 2. That an initial annual contribution of $216,100, or such pro-rata part thereof as the California JPIA might determine for coverage of less than a fiscal period, for the Liability Program is approved and the appropriate officers of the City of Laguna Hills are authorized to pay the same to the California JPIA.

SECTION 3. That the City of Laguna Hills will subsequently be required to make deposits and deposit adjustments as provided in the California JPIA Joint Powers Agreement.

SECTION 4. That the coverage provided is from the first dollar incurred per occurrence and there is no self-insured retention level. The cost allocation formula, including the self-insured retention level, is periodically reviewed by the California JPIA and may be changed or amended in subsequent Program years.

7.1.1.b
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Liability Protection Program of the CJPIA Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

SECTION 5. That the Mayor shall sign, and the City of Laguna Hills’ Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force.

SECTION 6. That the City of Laguna Hills’ Clerk is directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the California JPIA, 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, CA 90623.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.b
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Liability Protection Program of the CJPIA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND

APPROVING POOLING OF SELF-INSURANCE THROUGH
THE PRIMARY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM

OF THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE

AUTHORITY
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 6500 et seq. and also Sections 990.4 and 990.8 of the California Government Code, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (“California JPIA”) was created in 1977; and WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills has executed the Joint Powers Agreement to become a member of the California JPIA; and WHEREAS, the California JPIA has established and administered a successful Workers' Compensation Self-insurance and Loss Pooling Program for its members since January 1, 1980; and
WHEREAS, there are significant financial and administrative advantages for the City of Laguna Hills to provide workers' compensation coverage for its employees through the Primary Workers' Compensation Protection Program of California JPIA.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Workers' compensation coverage for employees of the City of Laguna Hills through the Workers’ Compensation Protection Program of the California JPIA is hereby authorized and directed, effective July 1, 2023, for a minimum commitment period of three years, pursuant to the terms of the Primary Worker’s Compensation Memorandum of Coverage in effect at the time of any occurrence covered by the Memorandum of Coverage.

SECTION 2. The City Manager or his/her designee of the City of Laguna Hills is authorized and directed to apply to the Department of Industrial Relations for a Certificate of Consent to Self-insure, and to take such other actions as be necessary to effectuate self-insurance of workers' compensation for employees of the City of Laguna Hills.

SECTION 3. That an initial annual contribution of $79,600 is approved for the Primary Workers’ Compensation Protection Program is approved and the appropriate officers of the City of Laguna Hills are authorized to pay the same to the California JPIA.

7.1.1.c
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving the Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Primary Worker's Compensation Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

SECTION 4. That the City of Laguna Hills will subsequently be required to make annual contributions and annual contribution adjustments as provided in Articles 17 and 21 of the Joint Powers Agreement.

SECTION 5. That coverage is provided on a first dollar incurred per claim basis and there is no self-insured retention level. The cost allocation formula, including the selfinsured retention level, is periodically reviewed by the California JPIA and may be changed or amended in subsequent Program years.

SECTION 6. That the Mayor shall sign and the City of Laguna Hills’ Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force.

SECTION 7. That the City of Laguna Hills’ Clerk is directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the California JPIA, 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, CA 90623.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.c
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving the Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Primary Worker's Compensation Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 3 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.c
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Authorizing and Approving the Pooling of Self-Insurance through the Primary Worker's Compensation RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING WORKERS’

COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN CITY

VOLUNTEERS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 3363.5 OF THE LABOR CODE
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills finds its best interest will be served by utilizing volunteers in the provision of certain government services; and WHEREAS, said volunteers should be eligible for workers’ compensation coverage while on duty.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Find and determine that the public interest is best served by providing workers’ compensation coverage for City volunteer workers as specified by the City Manager.

SECTION 2. Provide eligibility for said volunteers for workers’ compensation benefits which will be applicable during the time the person actually performs volunteer services, provided, however, that the rights of volunteers shall be limited as set forth in the Labor Code.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.d
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Proposed Resolution to Provide Workers' Compensation Coverage for Certain City Volunteers Pursuant to the Provisions of Labor Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.d
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Proposed Resolution to Provide Workers' Compensation Coverage for Certain City Volunteers Pursuant to the Provisions of Labor RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A POLICY

THAT DELEGATES BASIC TORT CLAIM HANDLING OF

MINOR CLAIMS TO THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS

INSURANCE AUTHORITY AS AUTHORIZED BY
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 910, ET SEQ
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (California JPIA), and pursuant to Government Code sections 990.4, et seq. and 6500 et seq. pools its self-insured liability claims and losses with other California JPIA members under a Memorandum of Coverage; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement creating the California JPIA authorizes it to exercise powers common to members and appropriate to defend and indemnify members from liability claims under the Memorandum of Coverage.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City of Laguna Hills delegates to California JPIA authority to act on its behalf pursuant to Government Code sections 910, et seq. to accept, reject, return as insufficient, or return as untimely any claims against it, and to provide any notices authorized under those statutes on behalf of the City of Laguna Hills.

SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority, 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, CA 90623.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.e
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Delegating Tort Liability Claims Handling Responsibilities to the CJPIA as Authorized by Government Code Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.e
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Delegating Tort Liability Claims Handling Responsibilities to the CJPIA as Authorized by Government Code i

Page 1 of 18 ends

Joint Powers Agreement
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
Amended July 17, 2019

JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE

AUTHORITY
AMENDED JULY 17, 2019

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 2 ARTICLE 2 - PURPOSES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 3 - PARTIES TO AGREEMENT............................................................................................................ 4 ARTICLE 4 - TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................................................................................................. 4 ARTICLE 5 - CREATION OF AUTHORITY ......................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE 6 - POWERS OF AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................. 4 ARTICLE 7 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................................................................. 5 ARTICLE 8 - POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ............................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 9 - MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS........................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 10 - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .......................................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 11 - POWERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ........................................................................ 6 ARTICLE 12 - MEETINGS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .................................................................... 7 ARTICLE 13 - CLAIMS COMMITTEE.................................................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 14 - OFFICERS OF THE AUTHORITY ............................................................................................... 8 ARTICLE 15 - ADVISORY COMMITTEES........................................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE 16 - COVERAGE ...................................................................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE 17 - DEVELOPMENT OF THE JOINT PROTECTION PROGRAMS............................................. 9 ARTICLE 18 - ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS ......................................................................................................10 ARTICLE 19 - RESPONSIBILITY FOR MONIES ..............................................................................................11 ARTICLE 20 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUTHORITY............................................................................11 ARTICLE 21 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEMBERS .........................................................................................12 ARTICLE 22 - NEW MEMBERS............................................................................................................................13 ARTICLE 23 - PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................14 ARTICLE 24 - WITHDRAWAL .............................................................................................................................15 ARTICLE 25 - EFFECT OF WITHDRAWAL......................................................................................................15 ARTICLE 26 - CANCELLATION OF PROGRAM PARTICIPATION.............................................................16 ARTICLE 27 - CANCELLATION OF MEMBERSHIP .......................................................................................16 ARTICLE 28 - CANCELLATION FOR NON-PAYMENT ..................................................................................16 ARTICLE 29 - ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS OF COLLECTION ...............................................................17 ARTICLE 30 - TERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION .....................................................................................17 ARTICLE 31 - PROVISION FOR BYLAWS.........................................................................................................18 ARTICLE 32 - NOTICES.........................................................................................................................................18 ARTICLE 33 – PROVISION FOR MAILED BALLOTS .....................................................................................18 ARTICLE 34 - AMENDMENT................................................................................................................................19 ARTICLE 35 - PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT ................................................................................19 ARTICLE 36 - AGREEMENT COMPLETE.........................................................................................................19

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 1 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019

JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

CREATING THE CALIFORNIA

JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the public entities organized and existing under the Constitution or laws of the State of California, hereinafter collectively referred to as “Members” and individually as “Member,” that are parties signatory to this Agreement. Said Members are sometimes referred to herein as “parties.” RECITALS:

WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. provides that two or more public agencies may by agreement jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 990.4 provides that a local public entity may self-insure, purchase insurance through an authorized carrier, or purchase insurance through a surplus line broker, or any combination of these; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 990.8 provides that two or more local public entities may, by a joint powers agreement, provide insurance for any purpose by any one or more of the methods specified in Government Code Section 990.4; and WHEREAS, each of the parties to this Agreement desires to join together with the other parties for the purpose of pooling their self-insured losses and jointly purchasing excess insurance and administrative services in connection with one or more joint protection programs for said parties; and
WHEREAS, it appears economically feasible and practical for the parties to this Agreement to do so;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of all of the mutual benefits, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 2 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply to the provisions of this Agreement:
(a) “Advisory Committee” shall mean the Managers Committee, Finance Officers Committee, Risk Managers Committee and any other committee created by the Board of Directors or Executive Committee for the purpose of providing specialized advice to the Board of Directors or Executive Committee on the subject matter brought before it. (b) “Alternate” shall mean that person or persons selected by the legislative body of each Member to represent the Member at the Board of Directors meeting in the absence of the Director, pursuant to Article 7 of this Agreement.
(c) “Authority” shall mean the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority created by this Agreement.
(d) “Board of Directors” or “Board” shall mean the governing body of the Authority. (e) “Chief Executive Officer” shall mean that employee of the Authority who is appointed by the Executive Committee, and is granted authority and responsibility for the management and administration of the Authority and its joint protection programs. (f) “Claims” shall mean demands made against the Authority, a Member, or Members arising out of occurrences that are within an Authority joint protection program as developed by the Executive Committee.
(g) “Contribution” shall mean an amount determined by the Executive Committee that is to be paid by the Member as its established share of funding required to cover the financial obligations of each joint protection program in which the member participates. (h) “Director” shall mean that person selected by and from the legislative body of each Member to represent the Member on the Board of Directors pursuant to Article 7 of this Agreement.
(i) “Executive Committee” shall mean the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Authority.
(j) “Finance Officers Committee” shall mean the committee of the Authority composed of the Finance Directors or chief finance officers of the Members by whatever title locally designated.
(k) “Fiscal Year” shall mean that period of twelve months that is established as the fiscal year of the Authority.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 3 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (l) “Insurance” shall mean and include pooled self-insurance through a funded program and/or any commercial insurance, excess insurance, or reinsurance contract purchased on behalf of the Authority to protect the funds of the Authority against catastrophes or an unusual frequency of losses during a specific protection period. (m) “Managers Committee” shall mean the committee of the Authority composed of the City Managers, City Administrators, or chief executive officers of the Members by whatever title locally designated.
(n) “Risk Managers Committee” shall mean the committee of the Authority composed of the Risk Managers or risk officers of the Members by whatever title locally designated.
(o) “Secretary” shall mean the person selected by the Executive Committee from among its members to serve as Secretary of the Authority. (p) “Treasurer” shall mean the person selected by the Executive Committee to serve as Treasurer of the Authority.

ARTICLE 2 - PURPOSES
This agreement is entered into by the Members pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Sections 990, 990.4, 990.8, and 6500 et seq. in order to provide more comprehensive and economical protection from financial loss, to reduce the amount and frequency of their losses, and to decrease the cost incurred in the handling and litigation of claims. This purpose shall be accomplished through the exercise of the powers of the Members jointly in the creation of a separate entity, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (the Authority), to administer joint protection programs wherein Members will pool their losses and claims, jointly purchase insurance and administrative and other services, including claims adjusting, data processing, risk management consulting, loss prevention, training, legal, and related services.

It is also the purpose of this Agreement to provide, to the extent permitted by law, for the inclusion at a subsequent date of such additional public entities organized and existing under the Constitution or laws of the State of California as may desire to become parties to this Agreement.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 4 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 ARTICLE 3 - PARTIES TO AGREEMENT
Each party to this Agreement certifies that it intends to and does contract with all other parties who are signatories of this Agreement and, in addition, with such other parties as may later be added as parties to and signatories of this Agreement pursuant to Article 22. Each party to this Agreement also certifies that the deletion of any party from this Agreement, pursuant to Articles 24, 26, 27, or 28 shall not affect this Agreement nor such party's intent to contract as described above with the other parties to the Agreement then remaining.

ARTICLE 4 - TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement became effective on June 29, 1977, and shall continue until and unless terminated as hereinafter provided.

ARTICLE 5 - CREATION OF AUTHORITY
Pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code, there is hereby created a public entity separate and apart from the parties hereto, to be known as the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 6508.1, the debts, liabilities and obligations of the Authority shall not constitute debts, liabilities or obligations of any party to this Agreement; except with respect to public retirement system liabilities, which shall be governed by Sections 6508.1 and 6508.2.

ARTICLE 6 - POWERS OF AUTHORITY
(a) The Authority shall have the powers common to its Members and is hereby authorized to do all acts necessary for the exercise of said common powers, including, but not limited to, any or all of the following:

1. To make and enter into contracts;

2. To incur debts, liabilities or obligations;

3. To acquire, hold or dispose of property, contributions and donations of property, funds, services and other forms of assistance from persons, firms, corporations and governmental entities;

4. To sue and be sued in its own name; and

5. To exercise all powers necessary and proper to carry out the terms and provisions of this Agreement, or otherwise authorized by law.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 5 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (b) Said powers shall be exercised pursuant to the terms hereof and in the manner provided by law and are subject to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising the powers of the City of Lakewood.

ARTICLE 7 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(a) The Authority shall be governed by the Board of Directors that is hereby established and that shall be composed of one representative Director from each Member, who shall be selected from the legislative body of that Member by the process chosen by the Member. (b) Each legislative body, in addition to appointing its Director of the Board, shall appoint at least one alternate who shall be an officer or employee of the Member. The alternate shall have the authority to attend, participate in, and vote at any meeting of the Board when the regular Director for whom he or she is an alternate is absent from said meeting.

ARTICLE 8 - POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of the Authority shall have the following powers and functions:
(a) The Board shall elect from its members pursuant to Article 10 of this Agreement an Executive Committee, to which it may give authority to make and implement any decisions, including those involving the administration of the Authority, except those decisions that would require an amendment of this Agreement, under Article 34 herein. (a) The Board shall adopt the operating budget of the Authority. (b) The Board may review all acts of the Executive Committee, including development of the memoranda of coverage, and shall have the power to modify and/or override any decision or action of the Executive Committee upon a majority vote of a quorum of the Board of Directors.
(c) The Board shall receive and review periodic accountings of all funds under Articles 18 and 19 of this Agreement.
(d) The Board shall have the power to conduct on behalf of the Authority all business of the Authority, including that assigned to the Executive Committee, that the Authority may conduct under the provisions hereof and pursuant to law. (e) The Board shall have such other powers and functions as are provided for in this Agreement.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 6 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (f) The Board shall not have the power to overturn the decisions of the Claims Committee in regard to the settlement of claims.

ARTICLE 9 - MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(a) Meetings. The Board shall provide for its regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings; provided, however, that it shall hold at least one regular meeting annually at a time and place determined by the Executive Committee.
(b) Minutes. The Secretary of the Authority shall cause minutes of regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings to be kept and shall, as soon as possible after each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member of the Board. (c) Quorum. A majority of the Directors or Alternates of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum may adjourn from time to time. A vote of the majority of those Directors or Alternates present at a meeting shall be sufficient to constitute action by the Board.
(d) Compliance with the Brown Act. All meetings of the Board, including, without limitation, regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings, shall be called, noticed, held, and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950 et seq.

ARTICLE 10 - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
There shall be an Executive Committee of the Board of Directors that shall consist of nine (9) members. Two of the members of the Executive Committee shall be the President and Vice President of the Board of Directors. The other members of the Executive Committee shall be elected by the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting for the terms provided in the Bylaws.

The President of the Authority, or the Vice President in his or her absence, shall serve as the Chairperson of the Executive Committee.

ARTICLE 11 - POWERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors shall have the following powers:
(a) The Executive Committee shall determine and select joint protection programs for the Authority including adoption of language of the Memoranda of Coverage and any limitations or endorsements to such Memoranda.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 7 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (b) The Executive Committee shall determine and select all insurance necessary to carry out the joint protection programs of the Authority. (c) The Executive Committee shall have the authority to approve membership in the Authority and Member participation in one or more joint protection programs in accordance with Articles 22 and 23.
(d) The Executive Committee shall have the authority to cancel Member participation in one or more joint protection programs in accordance with Articles 26 and 28. (e) The Executive Committee shall develop the operating budget of the Authority. (f) The Executive Committee shall have authority to contract for or develop various services for the Authority, including, but not limited to, claims adjusting, loss control, and risk management consulting services.
(g) The Executive Committee shall receive and act upon reports of the Advisory Committees and the Chief Executive Officer.
(h) The Executive Committee shall appoint the Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of the Authority.
(i) The Executive Committee shall have the power to hire such persons as the Executive Committee deems necessary for the administration of the Authority. (j) The Executive Committee shall have the general supervisory and policy control over the day-to-day decisions and administrative activities of the Chief Executive Officer of the Authority.
(k) The Executive Committee shall have such other powers and functions as are provided for in this Agreement or as delegated by the Board of Directors, including the power to create committees it deems necessary.

ARTICLE 12 - MEETINGS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The meetings of the Executive Committee shall be held and conducted in the same manner as the meetings of the Board of Directors, provided for in Article 9 of this Agreement.

In addition, the Committee shall make periodic reports to the Board of Directors, advising the Board of its decisions and activities concerning the implementation of the joint protection programs of the Authority.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 8 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 ARTICLE 13 - CLAIMS COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee members, together with the Chairs of the Managers Committee and the Finance Officers Committee, shall sit as the Claims Committee of the Authority. The Claims Committee shall have authority to make all determinations regarding defense, indemnity, and settlement of claims under the Memoranda of Coverage. Decisions of the Claims Committee regarding settlement of claims shall be final and not subject to further review.

Decisions regarding coverage for defense or indemnity of claims shall be final, but subject to the Member’s appeal rights as detailed in the applicable Memorandum of Coverage.

ARTICLE 14 - OFFICERS OF THE AUTHORITY
(a) President and Vice President. The Board shall elect a President and Vice President of the Authority, each to hold office for a two-year term, except as hereinafter provided, and until a successor is elected. The election of the President and Vice President shall be on alternate years. In the event the President so elected ceases to be a member of the Board, or for other reasons is unable to serve, the Vice President shall assume the position of President and serve the remainder of the prior President’s unexpired term. In the event the Vice President so elected ceases to be a member of the Board, or for other reasons is unable to serve, the Executive Committee shall select from among its membership a new Vice President who shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term.
(b) Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer shall be authorized and responsible for the overall management and administration of the Authority and its joint protection programs and shall select and appoint all employees. (c) Secretary. The Secretary shall be responsible for all minutes, notices and records of the Authority and shall perform such other duties as may be assigned by the Executive Committee.
(d) Treasurer. The duties of the Treasurer are set forth in Articles 18 and 19 of this Agreement.
(e) Attorney. The Executive Committee shall select an attorney for the Authority.

The attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the Executive Committee. (f) The Executive Committee shall have the power to appoint such other officers as may be necessary in order to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 9 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 ARTICLE 15 - ADVISORY COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors or Executive Committee may establish Advisory Committees as deemed necessary. Such Committees shall meet from time to time as deemed necessary by them, and shall make recommendations to the Executive Committee based upon their expertise.

ARTICLE 16 - COVERAGE
(a) The coverage provided for Members through the Authority’s joint protection programs may include protection for Personal Injury, Errors and Omissions, Contractual and Comprehensive Liability, Workers’ Compensation and such other areas of coverage as the Executive Committee may determine. Such coverage may be through insurance as defined in Article 1.
(b) The Authority shall maintain limits of coverage for Members determined by the Executive Committee to be adequate. The Executive Committee may arrange for a group policy to be issued for Members interested in obtaining additional coverage above the limits of coverage at an additional cost to those participating Members. (c) The Executive Committee shall arrange for the purchase of insurance it deems necessary to protect the funds of the Authority against catastrophes. The Executive Committee shall have the authority to discontinue purchase of this insurance, if at a future time the Executive Committee determines that it is no longer needed to protect the Authority's funds.

ARTICLE 17 - DEVELOPMENT OF THE JOINT PROTECTION PROGRAMS (a) The joint protection programs provided by the Authority shall extend to agencies or authorities as determined in the Memorandum of Coverage of each program. (b) The cost allocation formula for each joint protection program shall be adopted by the Executive Committee.
(c) The contribution for each Member’s participation in a joint protection program shall be determined by the Executive Committee.
(d) The cost allocation formula adopted by the Executive Committee for each joint protection program may provide for retrospective adjustments, and each Member shall pay any additional contribution required by such retrospective adjustment.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 10 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (e) The Executive Committee may provide for payment of a portion of such contributions to be made over a period of time on terms set by the Executive Committee. (f) The Executive Committee may expand the Authority's offerings of joint protection programs to make available for Members’ protection in addition to that which is provided for in this Agreement.
(g) Contributions held by the Authority for each joint protection program shall be accounted for separately, so that only Members participating in the program will share in pooled losses and expenses of that program. This separate accounting shall not prohibit the Authority from commingling contributions for purposes of investment, nor from paying losses or expenses when due from all available funds. As deemed appropriate, the Executive Committee may provide for inter-program transfers in the forms of loans, letters of credit, or other financial arrangements that stipulate that the lending program will be made whole by the borrowing program through the timely repayment of principal and compensation for the value of lost investment earnings during the financing period.

ARTICLE 18 - ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
(a) Budget. The Authority shall adopt an operating budget, pursuant to Article 11(e) of this Agreement.
(b) Funds and Accounts. The Treasurer of the Authority shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice or by the Executive Committee. Books and records of the Authority in the hands of the Treasurer shall be open to any inspection at all reasonable times by representatives of a Member. (c) Treasurer's Report. The Treasurer, within 270 days after the close of each fiscal year, shall give a complete written report of all financial activities for such fiscal year to the Board and to each Member.
(d) Annual Audit. The Executive Committee shall provide for a certified, annual audit of the accounts and records of the Authority. The audit shall conform to generally accepted auditing standards. When such an audit of the accounts and records is made by a Certified Public Accountant, a report thereof shall be filed as a public record with each of the Members.

Such report shall be filed within nine months of the end of the year under examination.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 11 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (e) Costs. Any costs of the audit, including contracts with, or employment of, Certified Public Accountants, in making an audit pursuant to this Article, shall be borne by the Authority and shall be considered included within the term “administrative costs.” ARTICLE 19 - RESPONSIBILITY FOR MONIES
(a) The Treasurer of the Authority shall have the custody of and disburse the Authority's funds. He or she shall have the authority to delegate the signatory function of Treasurer to such persons as are authorized by the Executive Committee. (b) A bond or other insurance protection providing coverage for embezzlement or other criminal acts in an amount determined by the Executive Committee to be adequate shall be required of all officers and personnel authorized to disburse funds of the Authority. The cost of such bond or insurance protection shall be paid for by the Authority. (c) The Treasurer of the Authority shall perform the duties described in California Government Code Sections 6505.5 and 6505.6 pertaining to the receipt, safekeeping, payment, and reporting of Authority funds.

ARTICLE 20 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUTHORITY
The Authority shall perform the following functions in discharging its responsibilities under this Agreement:
(a) Provide loss protection as necessary, through various means including but not limited to insurance or other financial risk transfer, by negotiation or bid and purchase. (b) Assist Members in obtaining coverage for risks not included within the joint protection programs of the Authority.
(c) Assist each Member’s assigned risk manager with the implementation of that function within the Member.
(d) Provide loss prevention and safety and consulting services to Members as required, which may include programs for grants or loans to Members for loss prevention or safety purposes.
(e) Provide claims adjusting and subrogation services for claims covered by the Authority's joint protection programs.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 12 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (f) Provide loss control and analysis by the use of statistical analysis, data processing, and record and file keeping services, in order to identify high exposure operations and to evaluate proper levels of self-retention and deductibles. (g) Provide contract review when requested by Members to determine sufficiency of indemnity and insurance provisions.
(h) Conduct risk management evaluations of each Member to encourage implementation of best risk management practices.
(i) The Authority shall have standing and shall pursue recovery in its own name or in the name of a Member for losses covered by a joint protection program. Such recovery may be through subrogation, cross complaint, or salvage, as appropriate. (j) The Authority shall have such other responsibilities as deemed necessary by the Board of Directors or Executive Committee in order to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 21 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEMBERS
Members shall have the following responsibilities:
(a) The legislative body of each Member shall appoint a representative and at least one alternate representative to the Board of Directors, pursuant to Article 7 of this Agreement. (b) Each Member shall appoint an employee to be responsible for the risk management function of that Member, and to serve as a liaison between the Member and the Authority as to risk management.
(c) Each Member shall maintain an active safety officer and/or committee, and shall consider all recommendations of the Authority concerning unsafe practices or exposures. (d) Each Member shall pay its contribution and any retrospective adjustment promptly to the Authority when due. After withdrawal or termination, each Member shall pay promptly to the Authority its share of any additional contribution, when and if required of it by the Executive Committee under Articles 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 of this Agreement. (e) Each Member shall report all claims to the Authority in accordance with the policies and procedures governing the joint protection program to which the claim applies. (f) Each Member shall provide the Authority with such other information or assistance as may be necessary for the Authority to carry out the joint protection programs under this Agreement.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 13 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (g) Each Member shall cooperate with and assist the Authority in the pursuit of recoveries for losses covered by a joint protection program, including assigning its right to recover subrogated amounts, and if necessary, executing a written agreement to effect such assignment.
(h) Each Member shall in any and all ways cooperate with and assist the Authority, and any insurer of a joint protection program, in all matters relating to this Agreement and covered losses, and will comply with all bylaws, rules and regulations adopted by the Board of Directors and Executive Committee.
(i) Each Member shall actively participate in the Authority’s Risk Management Evaluation and Loss Control Action Plan (LossCAP) programs.

ARTICLE 22 - NEW MEMBERS
The Authority shall allow entry of new Members approved by the Executive Committee. (a) Executive Committee approval for new Members shall be according to the following procedure:

1. Investigation of each potential member by Authority staff and preparation of a report;

2. Review of the report by the Underwriting Committee, which shall then be forwarded to all Directors for review and comment;

3. Review by the Directors and submittal of comments to the Chief Executive Officer during the comment period; and

4. Approval by a two-thirds vote of the Executive Committee. (b) Membership is effective immediately upon approval by the Executive Committee and execution of this Agreement by the new Member to join the Authority. (c) A Member entering under this Article may be required to pay its share of organization expenses as determined by the Executive Committee including those necessary to analyze its loss data and determine its contributions.
(d) Should the Board of Directors rescind the membership approval made by the Executive Committee pursuant to Article 8(b), the Member shall be given at least ninety days advance notice of the effective date of termination of Membership, and the Member shall be

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 14 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 treated as if it had withdrawn on the effective date, and shall have the same responsibilities as if the Member had voluntarily withdrawn on the effective date. (e) New Members, accepted into membership after July 1, 2016, shall have provisional membership status throughout the initial five years of membership. During the provisional membership period:

1. The Authority reserves the right to retrospectively adjust the cost of coverage for provisional Members based on actual claims development, in the event that it varies materially from claims data provided to the Authority at the time of the initial underwriting; and

2. The Authority reserves the right to terminate membership of any provisional Member at the end of a protection period, with or without cause, by a two-thirds vote of the Executive Committee, provided the Executive Committee gives the provisional Member at least ninety days advance notice of the effective date of the termination of membership.

3. A provisional Member subject to termination under Paragraph 2, above, may appeal said termination to a panel of five chief executives randomly selected from the other Members.
(f) If a provisional Member does not complete five successive years of membership in good standing, due to withdrawal or termination, that provisional Member is not eligible to receive in any refunds, dividends, or equity distributions that may occur during the provisional membership period or at any time thereafter.

ARTICLE 23 - PROGRAM PARTICIPATION
The Authority shall allow for the participation of Members in the joint protection programs as approved by the Executive Committee.
(a) Executive Committee approval for new Members shall be according to the following procedure:

1. Investigation of a potential participant by Authority staff and preparation of a report;

2. Consideration of the report by the Underwriting Committee with a recommendation to the Executive Committee; and

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 15 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019

3. Approval by a two-thirds vote of the Executive Committee, (b) Program participation is effective immediately upon approval by the Executive Committee and execution of appropriate resolutions and/or other documents by the new participant allowing participation in the joint protection program. (c) A Member entering into a joint protection program may be required to pay its share of program development expenses as determined by the Executive Committee including those necessary to analyze its loss data and determine its contributions. (d) Should the Board of Directors rescind the program participation approval made by the Executive Committee pursuant to Article 8(b), the Member shall be given at least ninety days advance notice of the effective date of termination of program participation, and the Member shall be treated as if it had withdrawn on the effective date, and shall have the same responsibilities as if the Member had voluntarily withdrawn on the effective date.

ARTICLE 24 - WITHDRAWAL
(a) A Member that enters into this Agreement may not withdraw as a party to this Agreement and as a Member of the Authority for a three-year period commencing on the effective date of its membership.
(b) A Member that enters into a joint protection program may not withdraw as a participant in that program for a three-year period commencing on the effective date of its participation in the joint protection program.
(c) After the initial three-year non-cancellable commitment to membership in the Authority or participation in a joint protection program, a Member may withdraw only at the end of any protection period, provided it has given the Authority a twelve-month written notice of its intent to withdraw from this Agreement and/or any joint protection programs in which it participates.

ARTICLE 25 - EFFECT OF WITHDRAWAL
(a) The withdrawal of any Member from this Agreement shall not terminate the Agreement, and no Member by withdrawing shall be entitled to payment or return of any deposits, contributions, consideration or property paid, or donated by the Member to the Authority, or to any distribution of assets.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 16 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 (b) The withdrawal of any Member from participation in a joint protection program shall not terminate the Member’s responsibility to contribute its share of contributions or funds to the program until all claims, or other unpaid liabilities, covering the period the Member was signatory hereto have been finally resolved and a determination of the final amount of payments due from the Member or credits to the Member for the period of its participation has been made by the Executive Committee. In connection with this determination, the Executive Committee may exercise similar powers to those provided for in the Article 30(c) of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 26 - CANCELLATION OF PROGRAM PARTICIPATION
The Executive Committee shall have the right to cancel any Member’s participation in one or more joint protection programs upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and in accordance with the Healthy Members Practices and Procedures protocol. Any Member so cancelled shall on the effective date of the cancellation be treated the same and shall have the same responsibilities as if the Member had voluntarily withdrawn from the joint protection program.

ARTICLE 27 - CANCELLATION OF MEMBERSHIP
The Board of Directors shall have the right to cancel the membership of any Member based upon a three-fourths vote of the entire Board of Directors. Any Member so cancelled shall on the effective date of the cancellation be treated the same as if the Member had voluntarily withdrawn from membership, and said Member shall have the same responsibilities.

Cancellation, as specified above, shall be within the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and may occur with or without cause, and the Board's discretion shall not be subject to any further review or appeal.

ARTICLE 28 - CANCELLATION FOR NON-PAYMENT
In the absence of a payment plan as authorized in Article 17(e), any Member’s participation in a joint protection program may be cancelled automatically in the event of a failure of the Member to pay any contribution as required in this Agreement. Should any contribution remain unpaid more than thirty (30) days after receipt of notice by the Member, the Authority will send a notice advising the Member that it is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the Member’s participation will be cancelled within thirty (30) additional

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 17 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 days unless full payment is received. Failure to make full payment as required in the notice of default shall be considered a withdrawal by the Member from the program effective on the date of cancellation specified in the notice of default; and no coverage shall apply to any claims submitted subsequent to the effective date of cancellation that arise from occurrences taking place during the current protection period. A Member cancelled for non-payment shall remain liable for a prorated share of the current year’s contribution and for all retrospective adjustment contributions through the date of cancellation and attributable to prior years of coverage in which it participated.

ARTICLE 29 - ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS OF COLLECTION
Should any Member or former Member fail to pay any contribution or retrospective adjustment contribution when due, the Member shall also be liable to the Authority for attorney fees and costs incurred by the Authority in pursuing collection of such sums.

ARTICLE 30 - TERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION
(a) This Agreement may be terminated by the written consent of three-fourths of the Members; provided, however, that this Agreement and the Authority shall continue to exist for the purpose of disposing of all claims, distribution of assets and all other functions necessary to wind up the affairs of the Authority.
(b) Upon termination of this Agreement, all assets of the Authority shall be distributed only among the parties that have been Members of a joint protection program, including any of those parties that previously withdrew pursuant to Article 24 of this Agreement, in accordance with and proportionate to their cash (including contributions) payments and property (at market value when received) contributions made reduced by their share of losses and expenses paid during the term of this Agreement. The Executive Committee shall determine such distribution within six months after the last pending claim or loss covered by this Agreement has been finally disposed of.
(c) The Executive Committee is vested with all powers of the Authority for the purpose of winding up and dissolving the business affairs of the Authority. These powers shall include the power to require Members, including those that were Members at the time a claim arose or at the time a loss was incurred, to pay their share of any additional amount of

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 18 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 contribution deemed necessary by the Executive Committee for final disposition of all claims and losses covered by this Agreement. A Member’s share of such additional contributions shall be determined on the same basis as that provided for annual contributions in Article 17 of this Agreement, and shall be treated as if it were the next year's annual contribution for that Member. (d) In the absence of an Executive Committee, the Secretary shall exercise all powers and authority under this Article. The decision of the Executive Committee or Secretary under this Article shall be final.
(e) A provisional Member that does not complete five years of membership pursuant to Article 22 shall not be entitled to any distribution of assets upon termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 31 - PROVISION FOR BYLAWS
The Board shall cause to be developed Authority Bylaws. Each Member shall receive a copy of any Bylaws developed under this Article.

ARTICLE 32 - NOTICES
Notices to Members hereunder shall be sufficient if delivered to the administrative office of the respective Member. Delivery may be by U.S. Mail, email, or other form of notice acceptable under the Ralph M. Brown Act.

ARTICLE 33 – PROVISION FOR MAILED BALLOTS
Unless specifically prohibited elsewhere within this Agreement or the Bylaws, all actions contemplated by the Board of Directors may be voted on by the Members by mailed ballot as defined in the Bylaws. This shall not include the election of officers or members of the Executive Committee. Actions taken by mailed ballot shall require the same percentage of votes cast by the entire Membership as the percentage that would be required of a quorum voting on an item at a Board of Directors meeting.

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Joint Powers Agreement Page 19 of 19 Amended July 17, 2019 ARTICLE 34 - AMENDMENT
With the exception of Article 27, this agreement may be amended by two-thirds vote of the Directors present at a duly held Board of Directors meeting, or by a two-thirds vote of the Membership for an amendment placed before the Membership by mailed ballot. Amendment to Article 27 shall require a three-fourths vote of the entire Board of Directors at a duly held Board of Directors meeting, or by a three-fourths vote of the Membership for an amendment placed before the Membership by mailed ballot.

ARTICLE 35 - PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT
With the exception of Article 21 (g), no Member may assign any right, claim or interest it may have under this Agreement, and no creditor, assignee or third party beneficiary of any Member shall have any right, claim or title to any part, share, interest, fund, contribution, or asset of the Authority.

ARTICLE 36 - AGREEMENT COMPLETE
The foregoing constitutes the full and complete Agreement of the parties. There are no oral understandings or agreements not set forth in writing herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have first executed this Agreement by authorized officials thereof on the date indicated below.

Date:

MEMBER:

By:

7.1.1.f
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: CJPIA Joint Powers Agreement (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 1 of 14 Adopted July 16, 2008
BYLAWS

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE

AUTHORITY
AMENDED JULY 17, 2019

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) ii
BYLAWS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I – OFFICES .............................................................................................................. 1 Section 1. Principal Executive Office. ________________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Other Offices. __________________________________________________________ 1 ARTICLE II - BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................................. 1 Section 1. Composition and Selection. _______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Vacancies. _____________________________________________________________ 2 Section 3. Annual Meeting. ________________________________________________________ 2 Section 4. Special Meetings. _______________________________________________________ 3 Section 5. Place of Meetings. _______________________________________________________ 3 Section 6. Quorum. ______________________________________________________________ 4 Section 7. Adjourned Meetings. ____________________________________________________ 4 Section 8. Voting. _______________________________________________________________ 4 Section 9. Inspectors of Election. ___________________________________________________ 5 ARTICLE III - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ........................................................................... 6 Section 1. Number of Members. ____________________________________________________ 6 Section 2. Composition, Selection and Term of Office. __________________________________ 6 Section 3. Vacancies. _____________________________________________________________ 7 Section 4. Resignation. ___________________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Removal of Executive Committee or its Individual Members by Board of Directors. ___ 8 Section 6. Regular Meetings. _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 7. Special Meetings. _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 8. Actions at Meetings. _____________________________________________________ 9 Section 9. Adjourned Meetings. ___________________________________________________ 10 ARTICLE IV – CLAIMS COMMITTEE ................................................................................ 10 Section 1. Composition. __________________________________________________________ 10 Section 2. Meetings._____________________________________________________________ 10 ARTICLE V - ADVISORY COMMITTEES ........................................................................... 11 Section 1. Managers Committee. ___________________________________________________ 11

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) iii
Section 2. Finance Officers Committee. _____________________________________________ 11 Section 3. Underwriting Committee. ________________________________________________ 12 Section 4. Other Committees ______________________________________________________ 12 Section 5. Meetings._____________________________________________________________ 12 ARTICLE VI - OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.................................................................... 12 Section 1. Officers. _____________________________________________________________ 13 Section 2. Election and Term of Office. _____________________________________________ 13 Section 3. Other Officers and Employees. ____________________________________________ 13 Section 4. Vacancies. ____________________________________________________________ 13 Section 5. Removal and Resignation. _______________________________________________ 13 Section 6. President._____________________________________________________________ 14 Section 7. Vice President. ________________________________________________________ 14 Section 8. Secretary. ____________________________________________________________ 14 Section 9. Treasurer. ____________________________________________________________ 15 Section 10. Chief Executive Officer _________________________________________________ 15 ARTICLE VII - MISCELLANEOUS ....................................................................................... 15 Section 1. Rules and Regulations of Joint Protection Programs. ___________________________ 15 Section 2. Annual Report. ________________________________________________________ 16 Section 3. Defense of Agents of the Authority. ________________________________________ 16 Section 4. Inspection of Authority Records. __________________________________________ 16 Section 5. Checks and Drafts. _____________________________________________________ 16 Section 6. Register of Demands. ___________________________________________________ 17 Section 7. Execution of Contracts. __________________________________________________ 17 Section 8. Rules of Procedure for Meetings. __________________________________________ 17 ARTICLE VIII - AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS .................................................................. 18 Section 1. Power of Board of Directors. _____________________________________________ 18 Section 2. Power of Executive Committee. ___________________________________________ 18

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 1 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
BYLAWS

FOR THE REGULATION, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY

STATUTE, OR THE AGREEMENT CREATING THE AUTHORITY, OF THE

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
ARTICLE I – OFFICES
Section 1. Principal Executive Office.

The principal executive office for the transaction of the business of the Authority is hereby fixed and located at 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, California 90623. The Executive Committee of the Authority shall have the authority to change the location of the principal executive office from time to time. Any such change shall be noted on the Bylaws by the Secretary, opposite this section, or this section may be amended to state the new location.

Section 2. Other Offices.

Other business offices may at any time be established by the Executive Committee at any place or places where the Authority is qualified to do business.

ARTICLE II - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 1. Composition and Selection.

The Board of Directors shall be composed of one Director from each Member of the Authority, who shall be a member of and selected by the legislative body of that Member, as provided for in the Agreement creating the Authority. Each legislative body shall also appoint at least one alternate, who shall be an officer or employee of that Member. The alternate may attend meetings and vote in the absence of the Director. One person may be duly appointed by more than one Member as the Director representing those Members. "Absence," as the term is used in this section, includes "vacancy" as defined in Section 2 of this Article II. “Director” as the term is used in these Bylaws includes an “alternate” serving in the absence of the Director.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 2 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
If a Member's membership in the Authority is terminated for whatever reason and by whatever method, that Member shall no longer have a representative on the Board of Directors, Executive Committee, or any other Committee of the Authority.

Section 2. Vacancies.

A vacancy or vacancies on the Board of Directors shall be deemed to exist in case of death, resignation, expiration of term, removal by the Member that made the appointment, or when the Director ceases to be a member of the legislative body of the appointing Member. Vacancies in the positions of Director or alternate or alternates shall be filled in the manner provided for regular appointment of such persons in the Agreement creating the Authority and the Bylaws.

Section 3. Annual Meeting.
(a) Time Held and Business to be Transacted.

The annual meeting of the Board of Directors shall be held in July of each year or at such other time as may be designated by the Executive Committee. At such meeting the President and Vice President of the Authority and other members of the Executive Committee shall be elected as provided in Article III, reports of the affairs of the Authority shall be considered, and any other business may be transacted that is within the powers of the Board of Directors.
(b) Notice.

Written notice of each annual meeting shall be given to each Member of the Authority by mail, email, or other means of written communication, in the manner provided by the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950, et seq. Such notice shall specify:
(1) the place, the date, and the hour of such meeting;
(2) those matters that are intended to be presented for action or review by the Board of Directors;
(3) if officers and members of the Executive Committee are to be elected, the names of nominees intended at the time of the notice to be presented for election;

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 3 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
(4) the general nature of any proposal to be presented for action with respect to approval of (i) a new Member, (ii) a contract or other transaction of the Authority with an interested Member, (iii) amendment of the Agreement creating the Authority, (iv) the cancellation of a Member's participation in a joint protection program, (v) voluntary termination of the Agreement creating the Authority, or (vi) a distribution of program assets upon program dissolution; and (5) such other matters, if any, as may be expressly required by statute or by the Agreement creating the Authority.

Section 4. Special Meetings.

Special meetings of the Board of Directors, for the purpose of taking any action permitted by statute and the Agreement creating the Authority, may be called at any time by the President, or by the Vice President in the absence or disability of the President, or by the Executive Committee of the Authority or by not less than ten (10) Members. Upon request in writing that a special meeting of the Board of Directors be called for any proper purpose, directed to the President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Authority, by any person or persons entitled to call a special meeting of the Board of Directors, the officer receiving such request forthwith shall cause notice to be given to the Members that a meeting will be held at a time requested by the person or persons calling the meeting, not less than fifteen (15) nor more than sixty (60) days after receipt of the request. Notice of any special meeting shall be given in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950, et seq. Such notice shall specify the place, date and hour of such meeting, and, if applicable, the names of nominees for officers or members of the Executive Committee intended at the time of the notice to be presented for election and the nature of the business to be transacted. No business other than that specified in the notice of the special meeting may be transacted at that meeting.

Section 5. Place of Meetings.

All annual or other meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at a place within the State of California designated by the Executive Committee by resolution.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 4 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 6. Quorum.

At any meeting, the presence in person or by approved teleconference by the Director or alternate of a majority of the Members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

Section 7. Adjourned Meetings.
(a) Adjournment.

Any meeting of the Board of Directors may be adjourned from time to time by the vote of a majority of the Directors present.
(b) Notice.

When any meeting of the Board of Directors is adjourned for forty-five (45) days or more, notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given as in the case of an original meeting.

Except as specifically provided herein, or by the Ralph M. Brown Act, it shall not be necessary to give any notice of the time and place of the adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted thereat, other than by announcement of the time and place thereof at the meeting at which such adjournment is taken.

Section 8. Voting.

Unless a record date for voting purposes is fixed by the Executive Committee, Members that are Members on the day of the meeting of the Board of Directors shall be entitled to vote at such meeting. Such vote may be by voice vote or ballot; provided, however, that all elections for officers or members of the Executive Committee must be by ballot upon demand made by a Director at any election and before the voting begins. If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority of the Members represented at the meeting shall be the act of the Board, unless the vote of a greater number is required by the Agreement creating the Authority or by statute. A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of Directors, provided that any action taken is approved by a number of Directors at least equal to a majority (or greater number if required) of the number required for a quorum for such meeting. Every Member shall have one vote to be exercised by its Director. If one person has been duly appointed by more than one Member as the Director representing those

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 5 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Members, said person shall have the right to cast votes equal to the number of Members for which he or she has been appointed as Director.

Ballots shall have imprinted on them, the name of the Member on whose behalf a ballot is cast.

Ballots shall be open to inspection and public disclosure. A Director has the right to change his or her vote up to the time the vote is finally announced and thereafter only with permission of the Board of Directors prior to adjournment. No Director may change his or her vote, nor may anyone challenge the vote of any Director after the results have been announced, except by the consent of the Board of Directors, and then only prior to adjournment of the meeting at which the vote was cast. Written proxies or powers of attorney casting the vote for any Director, directing any Director to vote in a particular fashion, or acting in the place and stead of any Director, are not acceptable. The vote of each Director or his or her alternate shall not be challenged on the basis that said Director or alternate voted contrary to the express will of the legislative body of the Member for which he or she acts.

Section 9. Inspectors of Election.
(a) Appointment.

In advance of any meeting of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee may appoint any persons, other than nominees for office, as inspectors of election to act at such meeting or any adjournment thereof. If inspectors of election are not so appointed, the President, or Vice President in his or her absence, may, and on the request of any Director or alternate, shall make such appointment at the meeting. The number of inspectors shall be either one (1) or three (3), at least one of whom shall be a member of the Board of Directors. In case any person appointed as inspector fails to appear or fails or refuses to act, the vacancy may, and on the request of any Director, shall be filled by appointment by the Executive Committee in advance of the meeting, or at the meeting by the President, or the Vice President in his or her absence. (b) Duties.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 6 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
The duties of such inspectors shall include: Determining the current number of Members, the Members represented at the meeting, and the existence of a quorum; receiving votes, ballots or consents; hearing and determining all challenges and questions in any way arising in connection with the right to vote; counting and tabulating all votes or consents; determining when the polls shall close; determining the result; and such acts as may be proper to conduct the election or vote with fairness to all Members. (c) Procedure.

The inspectors of election shall perform their duties impartially, in good faith, to the best of their ability and as expeditiously as is practical. The decision, act or certificate of a majority of the inspectors shall be effective in all respects as the decision, act or certificate of all. Any report or certificate made by the inspectors of election is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

ARTICLE III - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Section 1. Number of Members.

The authorized number of members of the Executive Committee shall be nine (9), until and unless changed by amendment of this Section, duly adopted by the vote or written consent of a majority of the Board of Directors, and subject to the limitations in the Agreement creating the Authority.

Section 2. Composition, Selection and Term of Office.

The Executive Committee shall consist of the President, Vice President and seven other members elected by the Board of Directors from the members of the Board.

The terms of office of the Executive Committee members shall be for a term of two years or until he or she resigns or is removed or otherwise disqualified to serve. Members of the Executive Committee shall hold office until their successors are elected.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 7 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
The President, or in his or her absence, the Vice President, shall serve as Chairperson of the Executive Committee.

Section 3. Vacancies.
(a) Creation of Vacancies.

A vacancy or vacancies in the Executive Committee shall be deemed to exist in case of the death, resignation, expiration of term, termination of membership on the Board of Directors, removal of any Executive Committee member by the Board of Directors, declaration of unsound mind by order of court, conviction of a felony, increase in the authorized number of members by amendment of the Agreement creating the Authority, or if the Board of Directors fail, at any annual or special meeting of the Board at which any members of the Executive Committee are elected, to elect the full authorized number of Executive Committee members to be voted for at that meeting. A vacancy in the Executive Committee may further be created by removal of any member by the Executive Committee when such member has been absent from two or more regular meetings of the Executive Committee without advance excuse approved by the Executive Committee during any one year (from July 1 to June 30), and the Executive Committee determines, after reviewing the circumstances of said absences, that such member should be removed.
(b) Vacancies Filled by Executive Committee.

Vacancies in the Executive Committee, except for a vacancy created by the removal of an Executive Committee member, may be filled by appointment by a majority of the remaining members of the Executive Committee, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining member of the Executive Committee, and each member so appointed shall hold office until the expiration of the term of the vacated seat. (c) Vacancies Filled by Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors may elect a member of the Executive Committee at any time to fill any vacancy or vacancies or seat filled on an interim basis by the Executive

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 8 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Committee. A vacancy in the Executive Committee created by the removal of a member by the Board of Directors may be filled only by the vote of a majority of the Directors present at a duly held meeting of the Board of Directors.

Section 4. Resignation.

Any Executive Committee member may resign effective upon written notice to the President, the Vice President, the Secretary or the Board of Directors of the Authority, unless the notice specifies a later time for the effectiveness of such resignation. A vacancy created by such resignation shall be filled pursuant to Article III, Section 3.

Section 5. Removal of Executive Committee or its Individual Members by Board of Directors.

The entire Executive Committee or any of its individual members may be removed from office by a two-thirds vote of the Directors present at a duly held meeting of the Board of Directors.

Section 6. Regular Meetings.
(a) Regular Meetings.

The Executive Committee shall hold a regular monthly meeting. In the event a meeting date falls on a holiday or conflicts with another activity of the Authority or its Members, the President and Chief Executive Officer may confer, and the President will reschedule the monthly meeting to a more convenient date, giving notice to all Members. (b) Call and Notice.

No further call or notice of regular meetings need be given, except as is required to comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950 et seq.

Section 7. Special Meetings.
(a) Call.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 9 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Special meetings of the Executive Committee for any purpose or purposes may be called at any time by the President, the Vice President, the Secretary, any two members of the Executive Committee, or the Chief Executive Officer.
(b) Notice.

Notice of the time and place of special meetings shall be given in writing to the members of the Executive Committee, delivered personally, by mail, email, or other approved method of delivery to each member at least 24 hours before the time of such meeting.

Such notice shall specify the business to be transacted at the meeting and no business other than that specified in the notice shall be transacted at that meeting. Said notice shall be given in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950 et seq.

Section 8. Actions at Meetings.

The President, or in his or her absence, the Vice President shall serve as the Chairperson of the Executive Committee. The presence of a majority of the authorized number of Executive Committee members at a meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business, except as hereinafter provided. Members of the Executive Committee may participate in a meeting through use of conference telephone or similar communications equipment, so long as all members participating in such meeting can hear one another; such participation in a meeting constitutes presence in person at such meeting. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Executive Committee members present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Executive Committee, unless a greater number is required by law, by the Agreement creating the Authority, or by these Bylaws. A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of members, provided that any action taken is approved by a number of members at least equal to a majority (or greater number if required) of the number required for a quorum for such meeting.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 10 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 9. Adjourned Meetings.
(a) Adjournment.

A quorum of the members of the Executive Committee may adjourn any Executive Committee meeting to a stated day, hour and place; provided, however, that in the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Executive Committee members present at any meeting may adjourn from time to time to a time not later than the time fixed for the next regular meeting of the Executive Committee.
(b) Notice of Adjournment.

If a meeting is adjourned for more than 24 hours, at least 24-hours written notice of such adjournment to another time or place shall be given prior to the time of the adjourned meeting to the Executive Committee members who were not present at the time of adjournment. Otherwise, notice of the time and place of holding an adjourned meeting need not be given if the time and place are fixed at the time of adjournment, except that the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., shall be complied with.

ARTICLE IV – CLAIMS COMMITTEE
Section 1. Composition.

The Claims Committee shall be composed of each member of the Executive Committee, the Managers Committee Chair, and the Finance Officers Committee Chair.

Section 2. Meetings.

The President shall appoint an Executive Committee member to serve as the Chair of the Claims Committee. The Chair, or in his or her absence the President, shall preside over the meetings.

The presence of a majority of the authorized number of Claims Committee members at a meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business, except as hereinafter provided. Members of the Claims Committee may participate in a meeting through use of conference telephone or similar communications equipment, so long as all members participating in such meeting can

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 11 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
hear one another; such participation in a meeting constitutes presence in person at such meeting.

Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Claims Committee members present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Claims Committee, unless a greater number is required by law, by the Agreement creating the Authority, or by these Bylaws. A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of members, provided that any action taken is approved by a number of members at least equal to a majority of the number required for a quorum for such meeting.

ARTICLE V - ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Section 1. Managers Committee.

Pursuant to the Agreement creating the Authority, the Managers Committee shall be composed of one representative from each Member, who shall be the City Manager, City Administrator or the Chief Executive Officer of that Member. An alternate may be designated in writing to serve in place of and may vote for that representative in his or her absence. At any meeting, the presence in person or by approved teleconference of at least seven Managers or alternates shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Committee members present at any meeting may adjourn from time to time to a time not later than the time fixed for the next regular meeting of the Committee.

Section 2. Finance Officers Committee.

Pursuant to the Agreement creating the Authority, the Finance Officers Committee shall be composed of one representative from each Member, who shall be the Finance Director or Chief Finance Officer of that Member. An alternate may be designated in writing to serve in place of and may vote for that representative in his or her absence. At any meeting, the presence in person or by approved teleconference of at least seven Finance Officers or alternates shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Committee members present at any meeting may adjourn from time to time to a time not later than the time fixed for the next regular meeting of the Committee.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 12 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 3. Risk Managers Committee.

Pursuant to the Agreement creating the Authority, the Risk Managers Committee shall be composed of one representative from each Member, who shall be the Risk Manager or risk officer of that Member. An alternate may be designated in writing to serve in place of and may vote for that representative in his or her absence. At any meeting, the presence in person or by approved teleconference of at least seven Risk Managers or alternates shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Committee members present at any meeting may adjourn from time to time to a time not later than the time fixed for the next regular meeting of the Committee.

Section 4. Underwriting Committee.

Pursuant to the Agreement creating the Authority, the Underwriting Committee shall be composed of the Managers Committee Chair and Vice Chair, the Finance Officers Committee Chair and Vice Chair, and the Chief Executive Officer of the Authority. Three representatives shall constitute a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the Committee members present at any meeting may adjourn.

Section 5. Other Committees
Other committees may be created by the Executive Committee for the purpose of providing specialized advice to the Executive Committee on the subject matter brought before it. The committee’s purpose, composition, quorum requirements, and meeting schedule may be defined by the Executive Committee or delegated by the Executive Committee to the advisory committee itself.

Section 6. Meetings.

Such Committees shall meet from time to time and shall elect their respective Chairpersons, Vice Chairpersons and other officers as deemed necessary by them. All meetings shall be noticed in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950, et seq.

ARTICLE VI - OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 13 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 1. Officers.

The officers of the Authority shall be a President, a Vice President, a Secretary, and a Treasurer.

The Executive Committee may, in addition, provide for other officers as it deems necessary for the performance of the business of the Authority.

Section 2. Election and Term of Office.

The President and Vice President of the Authority shall be elected by the Board of Directors at its annual meeting, and each shall hold office for a term of two years or until he or she resigns or is removed or otherwise disqualified to serve, and until his or her successor is elected.

Section 3. Other Officers and Employees.

The Executive Committee shall appoint, or may empower the President to appoint, subject to ratification by the Executive Committee, all officers other than the President and Vice President.

Except as may otherwise be provided in the Agreement creating the Authority or the Bylaws, such officers shall hold office until replaced by action of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall also appoint a Chief Executive Officer and Authority Attorney who shall serve at the pleasure of the Executive Committee or for such term as the Executive Committee may provide by agreement. All officers and employees shall have such authority and perform such duties as are provided in the Agreement creating the Authority, or the Bylaws or as the Executive Committee may from time to time determine. The Executive Committee may provide for the payment of compensation to officers or employees for their services to the Authority.

Section 4. Vacancies.

A vacancy in any office because of death, resignation, removal, disqualification, expiration of term, or any other cause shall be filled in the manner prescribed in the Agreement creating the Authority and the Bylaws for regular appointments to such office.

Section 5. Removal and Resignation.
(a) Removal.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 14 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
The President, Vice President or any Executive Committee member may be removed, without cause, by the Board of Directors, at any regular or special meeting thereof. An officer chosen by the Executive Committee may be removed, without cause, by the Executive Committee or by any officer upon whom such power of removal may be conferred by the Executive Committee, (subject, in each case, to the rights, if any, of an officer under any contract of employment).
(b) Resignation.

Any officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Executive Committee or to the President, or to the Secretary of the Authority, without prejudice, however, to the rights, if any, of the Authority under any contract to which such officer is a party.

Any such resignation shall take effect at the date of the receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein; and, unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

Section 6. President.

The President shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee. He or she shall be a member of all of the Executive Committee standing committees and shall have the powers and duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors, the Agreement creating the Authority, or the Bylaws.

Section 7. Vice President.

In the absence or disability of the President, the Vice President shall perform all the duties of the President, and when so acting shall have all the powers of, and be subject to all the restrictions upon, the President. The Vice President shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as from time to time may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or the Bylaws.

Section 8. Secretary.

The Secretary shall record or cause to be recorded, and shall keep or cause to be kept, at the principal executive office or such other place as the Executive Committee may order, a permanent record of minutes of actions taken at all meetings of the Board of Directors and

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 15 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Executive Committee, whether regular or special, (and, if special, how authorized), the notice thereof given, the names of those present at the meetings, and the proceedings thereof.

The Secretary shall keep, or cause to be kept, at the principal executive office of the Authority a list of all designated Directors and alternates of each Member.

The Secretary shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the Executive Committee required by the Bylaws or by law to be given, and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Executive Committee, the Agreement creating the Authority, or by the Bylaws.

Section 9. Treasurer.

The Treasurer shall keep and maintain, or cause to be kept and maintained, adequate and correct financial records of the Authority, including accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, and disbursements, and shall have such other duties as are provided for in the Agreement creating the Authority.

Section 10. Chief Executive Officer
The Chief Executive Officer shall be authorized and responsible for the overall management and administration of the Authority and its joint protection programs and shall select and appoint all employees. The Chief Executive Officer shall have such other and related duties as may be prescribed by the Executive Committee or the Bylaws.

ARTICLE VII – MISCELLANEOUS
Section 1. Rules and Regulations of Joint Protection Programs.

As soon as practicable after development of the details of a joint protection program of the Authority, the specific rules and regulations for the implementation of the program shall be adopted by the Executive Committee, which shall cause them to be set forth in written form and a copy thereof distributed to each Member. Such rules and regulations shall be included in any procedure manual prepared by the Authority for the Members.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 16 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 2. Annual Report.

The Executive Committee of the Authority shall cause an annual report to be sent to the Members not later than 270 days after the close of each fiscal year. Such report shall contain a statement of net position as of the end of such fiscal year and a statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net position for such fiscal year, and shall be accompanied by the annual audit report thereon and such other information as may be required by law.

Section 3. Defense and Indemnification of Agents of the Authority. (a) For the purpose of this Article, "agent" means any person who is or was an officer, board member, employee, or other agent of the Authority.
(b) The Authority shall provide for the defense and indemnity of any civil action or proceeding brought against any such agent of the Authority in his or her official or individual capacity or both, on account of an act or omission within the scope of his or her agency as an agent of the Authority, and to the extent of such defense as is provided for in California Government Code Section 995 et seq.

Section 4. Inspection of Authority Records.

The accounting, books and records, the list of Members' designated Directors and alternates, and minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee and all other committees of the Authority shall be open to the inspection of any Member at any reasonable time. Such inspection by a Member may be made in person or by agent or attorney, and the right of inspection includes the right to copy and make extracts.

Section 5. Checks and Drafts.

All checks, drafts or other orders for payment of money, notes or other evidences of indebtedness, issued in the name of or payable to the Authority, shall be signed or endorsed by the President and Treasurer or by such person or persons and in such manner as, from time to time, shall be determined by the Executive Committee.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 17 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019
Section 6. Register of Demands.

A register of all demands shall be submitted to the Executive Committee for payment approval and shall have attached thereto the affidavit or declaration of the Chief Executive Officer certifying as to the accuracy of the demands and the availability of funds for payment thereof.

The Executive Committee shall not hear, consider, allow or approve any bill or demand against the Authority unless the same is itemized giving names, dates, and particular services tendered, and any other pertinent details as the case may be. Demands for salaries and wages of officers and employees of the Authority may, but need not be, presented to the Executive Committee prior to payment but shall appear on the next register of demands for approval.

After approval of the register of demands by the Executive Committee, the public officer performing the function of Treasurer shall sign the warrant authorizing payment of the demands so approved. Signatures on warrants may be by facsimile.

Section 7. Execution of Contracts.

The Executive Committee may authorize any officer or officers, agent or agents, to enter into any contract or execute any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the Authority, and such authorization may be general or confined to specific instances. Unless so authorized by the Executive Committee, no officer, agent or employee shall have any power or authority to bind the Authority by any contract or engagement or to pledge its credit or to render it liable for any purpose or to any amount. The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to enter into any contract or execute any instrument in the name of, and on behalf of, the Authority for services and programs approved by the Executive Committee or Board of Directors, subject to limitations (including budget limitations) set by the Executive Committee or the Board of Directors.

Section 8. Rules of Procedure for Meetings.

All meetings of the Board of Directors, Executive Committee, and any other Committees of the Authority, shall be conducted in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order, except where such are in conflict with California law, the Agreement creating the Authority, or the Bylaws, whereupon the latter three shall govern over said Rules of Order.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) Bylaws Page 18 of 18 Amended July 17, 2019

ARTICLE VIII - AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS
Section 1. Power of Board of Directors.

New Bylaws may be adopted, or these Bylaws may be amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of a majority of the quorum at a meeting of the Board of Directors, except as otherwise provided by the Agreement creating the Authority.

Section 2. Power of Executive Committee.

Subject to the right of the Board of Directors as provided in Section 1 of this Article VIII to adopt or amend Bylaws, Bylaws other than a bylaw or amendment thereof changing the authorized number of members of the Executive Committee may be adopted or amended by the Executive Committee. Any amendment by the Executive Committee shall be on the agenda of the next meeting of the Board of Directors for ratification. An affirmative vote by a majority of the quorum shall constitute ratification of the amendment.

7.1.1.g
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: CJPIA Bylaws (3098 : Participation in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING FROM

MEMBERSHIP IN THE EXCLUSIVE RISK MANAGEMENT

AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, in 2003, the City of Laguna Hills became a member of the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC) for the purpose of jointly funding insurance and risk management programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills conducted a due diligence insurance program review to ensure the City of Laguna Hills is receiving the best value in services and insurance costs and risk management programs; and
WHEREAS, at the March 28, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council determined that the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) would provide the City of Laguna Hills with enhanced insurance programs and risk management programs at a reduced cost; and
WHEREAS, at the March 28, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council approved a Resolution to allow the City of Laguna Hills to participate and join the CJPIA; therefore, ending membership in ERMAC.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. This Resolution confirms the City of Laguna Hill’s withdrawal from ERMAC, effective July 1, 2023.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.h
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC) Liability Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.h
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Exclusive Risk Management Authority of California (ERMAC) Liability RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03-28-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING FROM
MEMBERSHIP IN THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAM OF THE SPECIAL DISTRICTS RISK

MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, in 2003, the City of Laguna Hills became a member of the Workers’ Compensation Program of the Special Districts Risk Management Authority (SDRMA) for the purpose of retaining workers’ compensation insurance coverage; and WHEREAS, the City of Laguna Hills conducted a due diligence insurance program review to ensure the City of Laguna Hills is receiving the best value in services and insurance costs and risk management programs; and
WHEREAS, at the March 28, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council determined that the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) would provide the City of Laguna Hills with enhanced workers’ compensation insurance coverage and risk management services related to employee health, safety, and wellness; and WHEREAS, at the March 28, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council approved a Resolution to allow the City of Laguna Hills to participate and join the CJPIA; therefore, terminating membership in the workers’ compensation program provided by SDRMA.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA

HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. This Resolution confirms the City of Laguna Hill’s withdrawal from the workers’ compensation program provided by SDRMA, effective July 1, 2023.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2023. ____________________________________

JANINE HEFT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.i
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Workers' Compensation Program of the Special Districts Risk Resolution No. 2023-03-28-X

Page 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(SEAL)
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

7.1.1.i
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Proposed Resolution Withdrawing from Membership in the Workers' Compensation Program of the Special Districts Risk City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE:

TO:

FROM:

ISSUE:

March 28, 2023
Mayor and Council Members
Joe Ames, P.E., T.E.

Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Motorized Mobility Device Safety RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) Receive and file the report; and 2) Direct Police Services to monitor and observe violations of state law and city codes related to motorized bicycles and devices and report back to the Commission in one year.

SUMMARY:

At the September 13, 2022, City Council meeting, the City Council directed the Traffic Commission and City staff to research safety concerns over bicycles, electric bicycles, and motorized mobility devices and provide a report to City Council. After discussion at two Traffic Commission meetings held in November and March where City staff and the Chief of Police Services indicated there is no electric bicycle problem and that no further ordinances are required to prohibit unsafe use of bicycles, electric bicycles, or motorized mobility devices, the Traffic Commission recommended “that the City Council direct Police Services to monitor and observe violations of state law and city codes related to motorized bicycles and devices and report back to the Commission in one year.” Therefore, this recommendation is being brought to City Council this evening for approval.

BACKGROUND:

At the September 13, 2022, City Council meeting, the City Council directed the Traffic Commission and City staff to research safety concerns over bicycles, electric bicycles, and motorized mobility devices and provide a report to City Council. Subsequently, City staff participated in a newly formed city staff level Quarterly E-Bike Coordination

7.2.1 Packet Pg. 410
Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Motorized Mobility Device Safety March 28, 2023

Page 2 ends

meeting led by the Orange County Transportation Authority on October 3, 2022, collected information on other Orange County city ordinances and how other cities were addressing any issues related to bicycles, electric bicycles and motorized mobility devices, and attended a Bicycle and Pedestrian Active Transportation Subcommittee meeting with then Mayor Wheeler on September 20, 2022.

The Quarterly E-Bike Coordination meeting held on October 3, 2022, focused on defining the problem of electric bicycles, if any, and discussing ways to conduct educational outreach. Out of the discussion, the attendees expressed an interest in exploring opportunities for creating new or enhancing existing bikeways, collecting and comparing city ordinances related to the topic, and asking OCTA to continue to lead coordination efforts, including public outreach.

On November 16, 2022, City staff presented a written report and an oral report to the Traffic Commission on this topic, which included a presentation from the Chief of Police Services. As the City department most likely to observe issues with bicycles, electric bicycles, and motorized mobility devices, the Chief of Police Services gave an oral presentation accompanied by a slideshow indicating there has not been an electric bicycle problem and that no further ordinances are required to prohibit unsafe use of bicycles, electric bicycles, or motorized mobility devices. Consequently, the Traffic Commission recommended “that the City Council direct Police Services to monitor and observe violations of State law and City codes related to motorized bicycles and devices and report back to the Commission in one year.” However, the Traffic Commission requested additional time to review the City staff written report before recommending any changes be made prior to presentation to City Council.

In the intervening period of time, City staff attended the February 2, 2023, Quarterly EBike Coordination Meeting to discuss updates on electric bicycle use and law outreach, regulations adopted by cities, planning initiatives to create more user-friendly bikeways, and enforcement issues and statistics. Information presented at the February 2, 2023, Quarterly E-Bike Coordination Meeting did not change City staff’s views on the issue.

The review of the November 16, 2022, City staff written report was placed on the agenda for the March 15, 2023, Traffic Commission meeting. At the March 15, 2023, Traffic Commission meeting, the Traffic Commission had no additional comments for City staff to incorporate into its written report. In his oral report to Traffic Commission, the Chief of Police Services provided updated statistics regarding bicycle and electric bicycle enforcement and accidents:

7.2.1 Packet Pg. 411
Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Motorized Mobility Device Safety March 28, 2023

Page 3 ends

• Since 2020, there have been 8 reported e-bike accidents. • Since 2020, there have been 19 reported bicycle accidents and 1 death. • Since 2020, there have been 3 citations issued regarding “riding on the right side of roadway,” “helmet required,” and “unlicensed” issues.

Previously, the Chief also provided other statistics in his November 16, 2022, slideshow.

Based on this oral update from the Chief of Police Services, the Traffic Commission indicated they wanted an update from Police Services on bicycle and electric bicycle enforcement and accident statistics at each Traffic Commission meeting to track the issue, and if necessary to recommend a different course of action.

Therefore, based upon City staff and Police Services presentations, the Traffic Commission recommended “that the City Council direct Police Services to monitor and observe violations of State law and City codes related to motorized bicycles and devices and report back to the Commission in one year.” It should be noted that the Chief of Police Services already agreed to do this, and will also provide statistical updates at each Traffic Commission meeting.

CEQA FINDINGS:

The recommended action does not qualify as a "project" subject to CEQA because it constitutes continuing administrative or maintenance activities, such as general policy and procedure making. (State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060(c)(3)) ATTACHMENTS:
• Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting
• Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting

7.2.1 Packet Pg. 412

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 415
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 416
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 418
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 420
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 421
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 422
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 423
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 424
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 425
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 426
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 427
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 428
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 429
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 430
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 431
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 432
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

7.2.1.a
Packet Pg. 433
Attachment: Police Services E-Bike Powerpoint Presentation, November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS

MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 16, 2022
TO: Traffic Commission
FROM: Joe Ames, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Motorized Mobility Device Safety In response to City Council’s direction for the Traffic Commission and City staff to research concerns over bicycle, electric bicycle, and motorized mobility device safety, the Public Works Director/City Engineer is providing this memorandum reporting on the following:

1. Types of electric bicycles (e-bikes) and motorized mobility devices, relative speeds, and why riding them on sidewalks, trails, and other areas can pose a risk to other users;

2. Existing City ordinances and State law regarding bicycles and motorized mobility devices;

3. A summary of observations by Police Services regarding safety issues and enforcement;

4. Existing bicycle routes and classes of bicycle routes; and

5. Proposed solutions including education, new ordinances, and new bicycle infrastructure, including ideas for future new dedicated Class 1 bikeways.

In addition, Police Services will make a presentation to the Traffic Commission at the November 16, 2022 meeting regarding their own observations and enforcement. This memorandum, after receipt of comments from the Traffic Commission, will be modified for use in a future report to City Council.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Types of Bike Routes
While bicycle facility design standards are not covered directly in the California Highway Design Manual or the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, there are bicycle facility classifications that have been agreed upon throughout the United States based upon the degree of separation from motor vehicle traffic. These classifications are defined in California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4.

The Orange County Transportation Authority’s District 5 Bikeways Strategy provides the following summaries and diagrams outlining the facility classifications:

Shared Roadways (No bikeway designation): Bikeways where bicyclists and cars operate within the same travel lane, either side by side or in single file depending on roadway configuration. In some instances, streets may be fully adequate and safe without bicycle specific signing and pavement markings.

Class III Bikeways (Bike Routes): Shared Roadways configured with pavement markings, signage and other treatments including directional signage, traffic diverters, chicanes, chokers and/or other traffic calming devices to reduce vehicle speeds or volumes. Such enhanced treatments often are associated with Bicycle Boulevards.

An example of a Class III Bikeway (Bike Route)
Class II Bikeways (Bike Lanes): These bikeways use signage and striping to delineate the right-of-way assigned to bicyclists and motorists. Bike lanes encourage predictable movements by both bicyclists and motorists.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and An example of a Class II Bikeway (Bike Lanes)
Class IV Bikeways (Cycle Tracks): These bikeways are exclusive bike facilities that combine the user experience of a separated path with the on-street infrastructure of conventional bike lanes.

Example of a Class IV Bikeway (Cycle Tracks)
Class 1 Bikeways (Bike Paths): These bikeways are facilities separated from roadways for use by bicyclists and pedestrians.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and An example of a Class I Bikeway (Bike Path or Trail)
State Laws Defining These Devices
The State Vehicle Code separates and specifically defines electric bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility devices, electrically motorized skateboards/boards, motorized scooters, and shared mobility devices.

The definition of an electric bicycle is provided for in Vehicle Code Section 312.5:
(a) An “electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts.
(1) A “class 1 electric bicycle,” or “low-speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour.
(2) A “class 2 electric bicycle,” or “low-speed throttle-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour.
(3) A “class 3 electric bicycle,” or “speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle,” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour, and equipped with a speedometer.
(b) A person riding an electric bicycle, as defined in this section, is subject to Article 4 (commencing with Section 21200) of Chapter 1 of Division 11. (c) On and after January 1, 2017, manufacturers and distributors of electric bicycles shall apply a label that is permanently affixed, in a prominent location, to each electric bicycle. The label shall contain the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and classification number, top assisted speed, and motor wattage of the electric bicycle, and shall be printed in Arial font in at least 9-point type.

There are no age restrictions for persons riding class 1 or class 2 electric bicycles, but persons operating a class 3 electric bicycle must be 16 years or older and all persons under age 18 must wear a helmet while riding an electric bicycle.

Examples of electric bicycles.

Some can look like motorcycles – the pedals give them away.

Others carry more than one passenger.

Most class 2 and 3 electric bicycles have a “throttle” that will propel the bicycle without pedaling.

This table provides a good summary of the different classes of electric bicycles and the laws governing their use:

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Credit: San Diego County Bicycle Coalition
The definition of electric personal assistive mobility devices, more commonly known as a “hoverboard,” is provided for in Vehicle Code Section 313:

The term “electric personal assistive mobility device” or “EPAMD” means a self-balancing, nontandem two-wheeled device, that is not greater than 20 inches deep and 25 inches wide and can turn in place, designed to transport only one person, with an electric propulsion system averaging less than 750 watts (1 horsepower), the maximum speed of which, when powered solely by a propulsion system on a paved level surface, is no more than 12.5 miles per hour.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Example of an “electric personal assistive mobility device” or “EPAMD” The definition of electric skateboards/boards is provided for in Vehicle Code Section 313.5:

An “electrically motorized board” is any wheeled device that has a floorboard designed to be stood upon when riding that is not greater than 60 inches deep and 18 inches wide, is designed to transport only one person, and has an electric propulsion system averaging less than 1,000 watts, the maximum speed of which, when powered solely by a propulsion system on a paved level surface, is no more than 20 miles per hour. The device may be designed to also be powered by human propulsion.

Examples of electric skateboards. They often come with remote controls.

The definition of motorized scooters is provided for in Vehicle Code Section 407.5:
(a) A “motorized scooter” is any two-wheeled device that has handlebars, has either a floorboard that is designed to be stood upon when riding

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and or a seat and footrests in place of the floorboard, and is powered by an electric motor. This device may also be designed to be powered by human propulsion. For purposes of this section, a motorcycle, as defined in Section 400, a motor-driven cycle, as defined in Section 405, or a motorized bicycle or moped, as defined in Section 406, is not a motorized scooter.
(b) A device meeting the definition in subdivision (a) that is powered by a source other than electrical power is also a motorized scooter.

Example of a motorized scooter.

Not to be confused with a motorized wheelchair, which is also sometimes called a motorized scooter.

Related to this discussion, the definition of “shared mobility devices” is defined by California Civil Code Section 2505 and is not a distinct class of vehicles in and of themselves. Rather, they are any of the above listed motorized vehicles that are made available to the general public for compensation through a digital application. Examples of shared mobility devices include Bird or Lime scooters and/or bikes. Being that these devices are not a distinct class of vehicles on their own, it does not appear that there are State laws regulating their use, and instead use is regulated based upon the specific type of device.

Furthermore, all of these devices are defined differently from motorcycles, “motor-drive cycles,” “motorized bicycles,” or “mopeds” in State law, generally, by having a seat or saddle and either by having a higher maximum speed or an internal combustion engine.

Thus, the subject of this report excludes motorcycles, “motor-drive cycles,” “motorized bicycles,” and “mopeds.”
State Laws Relating to the Operation of Bicycles, Electric Bicycles, Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Devices, Electric Skateboards and Motorized Scooters
Electric bicycle or (“E-bike”): Persons riding E-bikes must comply with the regulations of the vehicle code related to bicycles, specifically VC § 21200

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and through § 21213. This includes a provision requiring persons riding upon a highway to comply with all applicable sections of the vehicle code including but not limited to the following: DUI and rules of the road related to traveling at a speed safe for prevailing conditions, obeying traffic signals, sharing of the roadway, following stop signs, and yielding of the right of way. While there is no state law prohibiting the operation of a bicycle or E-bike on a sidewalk, local authorities are permitted to adopt ordinances regulating the use of bicycles including E-bikes on pedestrian facilities including banning them from sidewalks or other areas under VC § 21206.

Electric personal assistive mobility devices: Pursuant to VC § 21281.5 a person operating these devices cannot operate without “due regard” to current road and weather conditions, cannot operate at a speed that endangers the safety of persons or property, and must yield the right of way to all pedestrians.

Electric skateboards/boards: Operation of electrically motorized boards is governed under VC §§ 21290-21296. These rules include that a motorized board is not to be operated by persons under the age of 16, they cannot be operated upon a highway, bikeway, sidewalk or trail unless a bicycle helmet is properly worn, if operated at night they are equipped with proper lighting and reflectors, they can only be operated on a highway with a speed limit of less than 35 mph, they cannot be operated at a speed greater than 15 mph or at a speed that is unsafe for prevailing conditions, they cannot be operated while under the influence of any alcohol or drug.

Specifically related to electric skateboards, which again operate outside of the size and power restrictions of a motorized board mentioned above, cannot be operated on any sidewalk, roadway, or any other part of a highway or on any bikeway, equestrian trail, hiking or recreational trail pursuant to VC § 21968.

The State permits local authorities to adopt additional rules and regulations related to the operation of Motorized boards by ordinance or resolution pursuant to VC § 21967.

Motorized scooters: Persons riding motorized scooters are governed under VC § 21220 through § 21235. This includes a provision requiring persons riding upon a highway to comply with all applicable sections of the vehicle code including but not limited to the following: drivers’ licenses, DUI and rules of the road related to traveling at a speed safe for prevailing conditions, obeying traffic signals, sharing of the roadway, following stop signs, and yielding of the right of way. Additionally, there are provisions of State law requiring motorized scooters to be equipped with relevant safety equipment, to operate with an exhaust system that is not excessively loud, and when traveling at a speed slower than the normal speed of traffic to operate as far to the right hand edge of the roadway as possible, to operate within a designated class II bike lane when available,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and to not operate on sidewalks, or to attach the rider or the scooter onto any other vehicle on the roadway.

The State permits local authorities to adopt additional rules and regulations by ordinance related to registration or parking of motorized scooters pursuant to VC § 21225. As well as to prohibit use of a motorized scooter on bicycle path, trail or bikeway pursuant to VC § 21230.

City Ordinances (Laws) Relating to the Operation of Bicycles, Electric Bicycles, Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Devices, Electric Skateboards and Motorized Scooters
The City of Laguna Hills already bans electric bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility devices, electric skateboards and motorized scooters in City parks.

Motorized wheelchairs or other similar conveyances for the disabled are not affected by the City’s municipal code. An excerpt from the Municipal Code can be found below.
8-04.280 Motor vehicles or similar conveyances.

Except for motorized wheelchairs or other similar conveyances for the disabled, and motorized vehicles used for park maintenance, no person shall operate or drive any motor vehicle, motorcycle, ATV, motorized quadricycle, motorized tricycle, or motorized scooter in a designated park, nor shall any person clean, wash, polish, or make any repairs to any such vehicle, cycle, or scooter in a designated park without a valid facility permit issued by the Director, or in the case of a private park, a written authorization from the consenting owner. (Ord. 2015-4 § 1 (part): Ord. 2004-12 § 2: prior code § 8-05.075.

Formerly 8-04.160)
“Motorcycle” means any motor vehicle, motorized bicycle, or motor-driven cycle as defined respectively in Sections 400, 405, and 406 of the California Vehicle Code. “Motorized quadricycle” means a four-wheeled device, as defined in Section 407 of the California Vehicle Code.
“Motorized scooter” means any two-wheeled device that has handlebars, is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, and is powered by an electric motor that is capable of propelling the device with or without human propulsion, as defined in Section 407.5 of the California Vehicle Code.
“Motorized tricycle” means a three-wheeled device, as defined in Section 407 of the California Vehicle Code.

Observations by Police Services Regarding Use of Bicycles, Electric Bicycles, Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Devices, Electric Skateboards and Motorized Scooters
Generally, Police Services reports users of these devices do not constitute a nuisance within the City. The number of complaints received and the number of accidents reported have been few, and the statistical data from Police Services

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and supports this viewpoint. Additional data can be found in the OCTA District 5 Bikeways Strategy Report, attached.

One fatality involving a motor vehicle striking a bicyclist occurred in September 2022 on southbound Paseo de Valencia near Alisal Avenue; however, it appears the driver of the motor vehicle was at fault for this collision.

City staff believes the interest in the topic has been driven by recent news articles on the subject, especially in light of the Carlsbad “state of emergency” declaration resulting from the deaths of electric bicycle operators after being involved in collisions with motor vehicles. Social media posts, especially originating from residents in coastal cities, and anecdotal information regarding unreported bicycle collisions and “near misses” have contributed to the perception that bicyclists, and in particular, electric bicycle riders are not respecting the laws.

Existing Bicycle Routes
In April 2011, the City Council approved the last update to the City’s 2001 Bikeways, Trails & Open Space Master Plan (Master Plan). The City also adopted the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan as the City’s “Bicycle Transportation Plan” in December 2009. The OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan identified proposed improvements to the City’s bicycle transportation system (bike routes) in order to allow the City to meet eligibility requirements for State bicycle transportation funding. The 2011 Master Plan update included proposed improvements identified in the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan.

Subsequently, the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG) and OCTA commissioned the District 5 Bikeways Strategy Report. This report was completed in March 2015. This report focused on nine “bikeway corridors” in South Orange County and proposed improvements which could be made to finish the corridors.

The existing bicycle routes in the City are outlined in Table 1 of the 2011 Master Plan update shown below.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 1 of the City’s Bikeways, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, updated in 2011, identifying existing Class I, II, and III Bikeways However, there are several gaps in the routes where bicyclists must share the road with motorists to traverse the City.

Insufficient connections exist between Mission Viejo and Laguna Hills, except via the Aliso Creek Bike Trail south of Los Alisos Boulevard. The Interstate 5 South County Improvement Project will provide a dedicated bike lane on La Paz Road within Laguna Hills and will provided a dedicated bike lane for the Los Alisos Boulevard bridge crossing over Interstate 5. However, the portion of La Paz Road within Mission Viejo immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 will not have a dedicated bike lane, and Oso Parkway and Alicia Parkway will still not have dedicated bike lanes to connect Laguna Hills with Mission Viejo.

Insufficient connections also exist between the central portion of Laguna Hills and north Laguna Hills. Some examples are below:
• There is insufficient right-of-way to provide a bicycle connection along Avenida de la Carlota from Ridge Route Drive to Los Alisos Boulevard. • There are segments of Moulton Parkway with insufficient right-of-way in the City of Laguna Woods.
• There is no bike lane on El Toro Road.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Opportunities and constraints for creating Class II and III bikeways are discussed in the next section of this memorandum.

Proposed Solutions
Proposed solutions may take the form of increased education, additional laws and enforcement, and/or new infrastructure to support the use of bicycles.

Education
Regarding increased education, Capistrano Valley Unified School District in partnership with the cities of Dana Point and Laguna Niguel and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department started a program requiring students attending certain schools to apply for a permit if they are planning on riding a bicycle, electric bicycle, scooter or skateboard to school. Attached is a printout from the Capistrano Valley Unified School District website outlining an example of the new permit process for Laguna Ranch Middle School. This program might be a model for schools in Laguna Hills.

Additionally, the City of Laguna Niguel has published a bicycles topic page on the City’s website encouraging residents to voluntarily register their bicycles with Police Services (Orange County Sheriff’s Department). The page also includes a “Electric Bicycle Feedback” form to allow citizens to report unsafe e-bike riding behavior, and a video published on YouTube by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department on bike safety.

Laws and Enforcement
Generally, State law allows local authorities to adopt ordinances regulating the use of bicycles including electric bicycles on pedestrian facilities including banning them from sidewalks or other areas under VC § 21206.

Recently, the City of Carlsbad declared a “state of emergency” over electric bicycle collisions. In response, the City passed a new comprehensive ordinance.

The Carlsbad ordinance regulates bicycles, electric bicycles, and electric personal assistive mobility devices in the following areas: 1) specific posted no riding zones, 2) some sidewalk riding prohibitions, 3) drainage facility riding prohibitions, 4) sports court riding prohibitions, 5) gymnasium prohibitions, 6) requirements to ride with due care and to reduce speeds, and 7) trail use limitations and prohibitions. The City Attorney advises the Carlsbad approach would be appropriate to follow, except for the penalties section, which would need to be changed to the standard misdemeanor and infraction penalties for Laguna Hills. In addition, the Carlsbad ordinance contemplates the establishment of an e-bike safety school which Laguna Hills could not conduct

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and due to staffing constraints. A copy of Chapter 10.56 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is attached for reference.

Aliso Viejo also recently passed an ordinance concerning bicycles, electric bicycles, and electric personal assistive mobility devices. Generally, the Aliso Viejo ordinance prohibits these devices from being ridden on sidewalks within a commercial or business center or complex, sidewalks adjacent to any public school building when school is in session, sidewalks and parking lots adjacent to or within any community or recreation center when in use, sidewalks adjacent to a church during services, parking lots of any property owned or operated by the City, or any pedestrian overcrossing or other sidewalk where prohibited by posted signs. In addition, the Aliso Viejo ordinance allows the Public Works Director to prohibit these devices on additional portions of sidewalk, as designated by the Public Works Director, and supported by appropriate signage.

A copy of the Aliso Viejo ordinance is attached for reference.

Both the Carlsbad and Aliso Viejo ordinances generally seek to ban bicycles, electric bicycles, and electric personal assistive mobility devices from sidewalks where potential conflicts with pedestrians exist thereby, in most cases, displacing these device users into lanes of vehicular traffic. As such, the Public Works Director/City Engineer recommends against enacting an ordinance which creates additional conflicts between bicyclists and motorists. Both ordinances also require enforcement by police.

New Infrastructure
There exist gaps in the roadway network to allow bicyclists and other mobilized device users to cross from area to area in the City. To this end, the Traffic Commission and City Council may consider authorizing funding to update the City’s existing bicycle route master plan in order to prioritize work efforts and funding toward constructing new and improved bicycle routes.

An example of a gap in the bicycle route network exists on Paseo de Valencia between La Paz Road and Cabot Road connecting the Class II bike route on Paseo de Valencia north of La Paz Road with the Class III bike route on Cabot Road. At a future Traffic Commission meeting, the Public Works Director/City Engineer may propose to place Paseo de Valencia on a “road diet” south of La Paz Road to reduce the number of through lanes in each direction from two (2) lanes to one (1) lane. This section of road is lightly travelled, and the City Engineer has determined the existing roadway configuration is not needed to accommodate the existing average daily traffic counts on this section of roadway.

Theoretically, this road diet would allow for space for the construction of a new median, dedicated bike lane in each direction, and parkway landscaping without the need to purchase any right-of-way. This road diet should also allow for space on the north side of the roadway to construct dedicated refuge lane in front of Valencia Elementary school that would be separated from through traffic, which

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and would address a verbal request made by Councilmember Pezold in October 2022 to investigate ways of providing a safer “drop off zone” on Paseo de Valencia in front of Valencia Elementary school. Currently, parents often park their vehicles on the shoulder of the roadway to drop off and pick up their children because the school’s existing parking lot does not have enough capacity for all the vehicles. This type of project should qualify for State funding under the Active Transportation Program because it would include bicycle and pedestrian mobility improvements. Potentially, Paseo de Valencia between La Paz Road and Alicia Parkway could also be placed on a road diet as part of this project to construct and continue the same improvements northerly to Alicia Parkway.

Even if this project were approved by the Traffic Commission and the City Council, unfortunately, it would be a multi-year effort. This proposed project would first need to be approved by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) because Paseo de Valencia is part of the County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). In order for the City to remain eligible for Measure M turnback funds, the City is required to certify annually that it has not reduced the number of travel lanes on any arterial highway. Therefore, an amendment to the MPAH would first need to be approved by OCTA prior to investigating any additional time and effort on this project.

The 2011 City’s Bikeways, Trails & Open Space Master Plan identifies Class II and Class III improvements to reduce the number of bicycle connectivity gaps in the City.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 2 of the City’s Bikeways, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, updated in 2011, identifying future Class II and Class III Bikeways.

Most of these locations will not be feasible under roadway widenings are implemented.

Final Thoughts
It looks decades for infrastructure to be built for the automobile. Now it appears we are the cusp of needing new infrastructure for e-bikes and bicycles.

The City Engineer is of the opinion that e-bikes are here to stay. For better or for worse, in particular, Southern California is at the forefront of e-bike movement.

The area has the combination of hilly terrain, nearly year-round good weather, and residents who can afford e-bikes that has resulted in their popularity as a method of recreation and transportation. It seems appropriate that the community embrace it with better and new education, enforcement, and bicycle infrastructure.

Attachments:

1. OCTA District 5 Bikeways Strategy Report

2. Appendix to the 2001 City of Laguna Hills Bikeways, Trails and Open Space Master Plan

3. City of Laguna Hills Bikeways Report – 2009

4. 2011 Bikeways, Trails & Open Space Master Plan Update

5. Police Services Bike Safety Flyer

6. Carlsbad City Ordinance – Chapter 10.56

7. Aliso Viejo Staff Report & Ordinance

8. Capistrano Valley Unified School District E-Bike Program

9. City of Laguna Niguel website printout

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Attachment 1

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and March 2015
KOA Corporation
KTU+
A

7.2.1.b
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and TABLE
I. EXECU
I.I Back
I.II Faci
I.III Reg
I.IV Ne
I.V Fun
I.VI Pro

1.0 INTRO

1.1 Bac

1.2 Stra

1.3 Bike

1.4 Juri

2.0 EXIST

2.1 Con

2.2 Rat

2.3 Act

3.0 REGIO

3.1 Reg

3.2 Eva

4.0 ACTIO

4.1 Pot

4.2 Pro

5.0 BICYC

5.1 Intr

5.2 Bicy

5.3 Sha

5.4 Path

5.5 Sep

E OF CO

TIVE SUMMA
kground ..........
litation Effort
gional Corrido
ar-Term Acti
ding Strategie
ograms ............

ODUCTION
ckground ........
ategy Overvie
eways Classif
sdictional Go

TING COND
ntext ..............
tionale .............
tivity Levels a

ONAL BIKEW
gional Corrido
luation and R
ON PLAN .....
tential Near-T
ogrammatic R

CLE FACILITY
roduction .......
ycle Facility S
ared-use Paths
h/Roadway C
parated Bikew
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
NTENTS
ARY ................
.........................
ts ......................
ors ..................
ion Plan ..........
es .....................
.........................

N .......................
.........................
ew ...................
fications ..........
overnance ......

DITIONS .........
.........................
.........................
nd Collision A

WAY CORRID
ors ..................

Ranking ............
.........................

Term Efforts ..
ecommendat
Y TOOLKIT .
.........................
election .........
s ......................

Crossing ..........
ways .................
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
S
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Analysis .........

DORS ...........
........................
........................
........................
........................
tions ...............
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

S STRATEG
ransportation
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

GY
Authority
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

KOA
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................

A Corporation
KTU+A
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
i
........ 1
........ 1
........ 2
........ 4
........ 9
........ 9
........ 9
...... 10
...... 10
...... 12
...... 12
...... 13
...... 15
...... 15
...... 15
...... 16
...... 23
...... 23
...... 43
...... 52
...... 52
...... 56
...... 65
...... 65
...... 69
...... 74
...... 83
...... 88

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.6 Sep

5.7 Sign

5.8 Sha

5.9 Bike

5.10 Re

5.11Bic

5.12 Bi

6.0 FUND

6.1 Fed

6.2 Stat

6.3 Reg

6.4 Priv

7.0 APPEN
A. Sam
B. Facil
C. Out
D. Cor
E. Corr
F. List o
parated Bikew
nalization ........
ared Roadway
eway Signing .
etrofitting Exi
cycle Support
keway Facility

DING STRAT
deral Program
te Programs ..
gional & Loca
vate Program
NDICES .........
ple Letter of
itation Efforts
treach ..............
rridor Ranking
ridor Cost Es
of References
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ways at Interse
.........................
ys .....................
.........................
isting Streets
Facilities .......
y Maintenanc
TEGIES ............
ms .....................
.........................
l Programs ....
s ......................
.........................

Support .........
s.......................
.........................
g Criteria .......
stimates – De
s .......................
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ections ..........
........................
........................
........................
to Add Bikew
........................
e .....................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
etailed Summa
........................

S STRATEG
ransportation
........................
........................
........................
........................
ways ...............
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
ary ..................
........................

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and LIST O
Figure ES.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.1
Figure 4.1
Figure B.1
LIST O
Table ES.

Table ES.2
Table 2.1:

Table 2.2:

Table 3.1:

Table 3.2:

Table 3.3:

Table 3.4:

Table 4.1:

Table 5.1:

OF FIGUR
.1: Project Co
: OC Superv
2: Caltrans Bik
: Bicycle Com
2: Causes of B
3: Bicyclist-Inv
: South OC R
2: Corridor A
3: Corridor B
4: Corridor C
5: Corridor D
6: Corridor E:
7: Corridor F:
8: Corridor G
9: Corridor H
0: Corridor
: Near-Term
: PDT Identif

OF TABLE
1: Corridor S
2: Corridor R
: Bicycle Tren
: Bicycle Colli
: Criteria We
: Criteria De
: Corridor Co
: Corridor Sc
: Proposed N
: National and
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
RES
orridor Over
visorial Distric
keway Classif
mmute Mode
Bicyclist-Invol
volved Crashe
Regional Bike
A: Pacific Coas
: Laguna Cany
C: El Toro/Alic
D: Portola/San
: Aliso Creek
: Muirlands/C
G: Oso Parkw
H: Antonio/La
I: San Juan Cr
m Corridor Im
fied Potential
ES
Scoring ............

Ranking ...........
nds in District
isions in Dist
eighting Facto
escription and
ost Estimates
coring ..............

Near-Term Im
d State Desig
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
rview...............
cts ...................
fications .........

Share by Cit
ved Crashes
es by Year ....
eway Corrido
st Highway ...
yon ................
cia/Laguna Ca
nta Margarita
k .......................

Cabot/Camino
way ...................

Pata/Pico .....
reek ................
mprovements
Bikeway Co
........................
........................
t 5 ..................
rict 5, 2007-2
or Adjustment
d Weighting S
s .......................
........................
mprovements .
n Guides .......

S STRATEG
ransportation
........................
........................
........................
ty1 ...................
by Year .........
........................
ors ...................
........................
........................
anyon .............
........................
........................
o Capistrano .
........................
........................
........................
........................
rridors ..........
........................
........................
........................
2011 ...............
ts ....................

Summary ........
........................
........................
........................
........................

A Corporation
KTU+A
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
iii
........ 6
...... 11
...... 14
...... 17
...... 22
...... 22
...... 24
...... 26
...... 28
...... 30
...... 32
...... 34
...... 36
...... 38
...... 40
...... 42
...... 55
... 147
........ 8
........ 8
...... 18
...... 21
...... 43
...... 44
...... 46
...... 47
...... 52
...... 69

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and I. EXE
This repo
bikeways
efforts, ni
a subsequ
at a later
While the
Authority
the agenc
of Pacific
promote
maintenan
Additiona
companie
The Distr
residents
establishe
centers. T
reduced a
outcomes
complete
These ass
and provi
I.I Backg
The Distr
which inv
pilot effor
in central
with a 20
process.
that conn
communit
and objec
more de
recomme
ECUTIV
ort summarize
throughout
ne regional b
uent feasibility
date, as agen
e Orange Co
y (OCTA) hav
cy’s that have
Coast Highw
the impleme
nce of the c
ally, the cities
s, rail operato
rict 5 Bikeway
and bicyclists
es bikeways t
The coordin
automobile tr
s within Dist
or enhance
sessments an
de the basis t
ground
rict 5 Bikeway
volves OCTA
rt for Supervi
and western
0% local matc
Phase 1 is th
nect to majo
ty and agency
ctives (see Ta
etail with th
ndations to t
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

VE SUMM
es the results
south Orang
bikeway corri
y study for th
cies work tow
unty Council
ve commissio
e jurisdiction.
way (State Ro
entation of co
corridors wi
s or the Cou
ors, and OCT
ys Strategy a
s of all skill le
hat cross jur
ated efforts
rips, reduced
trict 5. The
the corridor
nd recommen
to apply for st
ys Strategy w
A, local jurisd
isorial Distric
n Orange Co
ch provided b
his bikeways
or activity c
y input and r
able ES.1 and
he developm
the local jurisd
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
MARY
s of a collabo
ge County (S
dors were id
he top three
ward obtainin
of Governm
oned this rep
In some case
oute 1) or at
orridors reco
ll be coordi
nty may nee
TA for right-o
ims to enhan
evels througho
isdictional bo
by OCTA
fuel consump
feasibility st
rs, recommen
ndations are
tate and fede
was developed
ictions, and p
ct 4 in northe
ounty in 2012
by OCTA. T
strategy, whi
centers. The
anked based
d Chapter 3)
ment of a f
dictions.

S STRATEG
ransportation
orative effort
Supervisorial
dentified and
corridors. T
ng funding for
ments (OCCO
port, impleme
es, roadways
t freeway inte
ommended in
inated and c
d to coordin
of-way acquis
nce communit
out south Or
oundaries and
and member
ption and air
udy will incl
nded designs
intended to
eral grants.
d as part of O
public stakeh
ern Orange C

2. It is funde
There are tw
ich identifies
regional bi
on criteria c
). In Phase 2
feasibility stu
GY
Authority
t to identify a
District 5).
ranked. The
The remaining
r the complet
OG) and the O
entation of bi
are managed
erchanges. W
n this report,
conducted by
nate with var
sition.
ty interaction
range County
d serve major
r agencies s
emissions, an
ude an asse
s, preliminary
help advance
OCTA’s regio
olders. This
County, then f
ed by a feder
wo phases of
the regional
keway corri
onsistent wit
2, the top-ra
udy, which
EXEC
KOA
and prioritize
Through ex
e rankings ser
g six corridor
tion of each c
Orange Coun
ikeway corrid
d by Caltrans
While OCCO
final design,
y the respec
ious landown
n and expand
y. The integra
r destination
upport impr
nd improved
ssment of w
y drawings, a
e local proje
onal bikeways
s process beg
for Superviso
ral grant rece
the regional
“backbone”
dors are ide
th regional tr
anking corrid
provide pla

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
e potential reg
xtensive facilit
rve as the bas
rs may by ass
corridor.
nty Transport
dors will be l
s, such as po
OG and OCTA
construction
ctive jurisdic
ners such as
travel choice
ated planning
s and employ
roved road s
community h
what is neede
nd cost estim
ct implement
s planning pro
gan in 2011 w
orial Districts
eived by OCC
bikeways pla
bikeway corr
entified base
ransportation
ors are stud
nning-level d
MARY
1 gional
tation
sis for
sessed
tation
led by
rtions
A will
n, and
ctions.
utility
es for
effort
yment
safety,
health
ed to
mates.
tation
ocess,
with a
1 & 2
COG,
anning
ridors
ed on
goals
ied in
design

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Regional b
as the Lo
Orange C
travel cho
Building o
team for
include h
railroads,
District 5
 G
 G
 G
tr
 G
I.II Facil
Preparatio
and the g
including t
bikeway plann
ong Range Tr
County Sustai
oices, improvi
on these broa
District 5. T
igh speed an
and freeways
local contex
Goal #1: Incre
Goal #2: Coor
Goal #3: Build
ransportation
Goal #4: Impro
itation Effo
on of this rep
general publ
the project d
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ning supports
ransportation
inable Comm
ing safety, and
ad goals, a se
These goals an
nd high volu
s, and hilly te
xt:
ease the use o
rdinate region
a bicycle tra
n facilities that
ove bicycling
orts
port was a co
ic. The pro
evelopment t
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
s the goals co
n Plan, OCTA
munities Strat
d supporting
et of goals, o
nd objectives
ume arterial
errains. Ther
of bicycles as
nal bikeways
nsportation n
t will meet th
safety in the
ollaborative e
ocess for fac
team and the

S STRATEG
ransportation
ontained in ex
A Commute
egy. These g
the viability o
objectives, and
recognize th
roadways, la
re are four m
a viable alter
planning and
network by p
he needs for a
district
effort betwee
cilitating discu
bicycling com
GY
Authority
xisting county
r Bikeways S
oals are inte
of bicycle tran
d strategies w
e physical cha
arge intersec
main goals esta
native to the
construction
lanning, desig
all types of bic
en OCTA, lo
ussions betw
mmunity is de
EXEC
KOA
ywide transpo
Strategic Plan
rrelated and
nsportation.
were develop
allenges facin
ctions, flood
ablished in ac
automobile
n among indiv
gning, and ma
cyclists
ocal agencies,
ween the var
etailed below

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
ortation plans
n (CBSP), an
include expa
ped by the p
g District 5, w
control cha
ccordance wit
idual cities
intaining
bicycle advo
rious stakeho
:

MARY
2 s, such
d the
anding
roject
which
annels,
th the
ocates,
olders

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The follow
Strategy:
 A
fr
C
La
C
te
o
cr
 Fo
D
bi
an
th
fe
 T
th
p
o
A
sa
re
p
w
bi
p
ni
ch
ro
p
co
ro
ra
p
re
co
wing summar
A project deve
rom each loca
County of Or
aguna Nigue
Clemente, San
eam participat
bjectives, op
riteria.
ocus group m
During the foc
ikeways corr
nd opportuni
he transporta
eatures for co
Two communi
he project. T
resentation o
n corridor
Approximately
afety, and soc
esidents. Pres
roposed corr
was attended
ikeway co
resentation
ine corrido
hanges sinc
oundtable wi
rioritizing th
orridors. Att
oundtable d
anking analys
rovided feed
ecommended
orridors. Pro
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
rizes the pro
elopment team
al jurisdiction
ange and the
l, Laguna W
n Juan Capistr
ted on the PD
pportunities a
meetings wer
cus group me
idors. The b
ties. This inc
ation network
onsideration a
ity roundtable
The first rou
on the draft r
concepts, ra
y 30 attende
cial justice sec
sentations de
ridors were
by approxim
orridors.
described t
ors and k
ce the fir
ith a focus o
he top thr
tendees at t
discussed t
sis results a
dback on t
d top thr
omotion of t
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ocess for facil
m (PDT) was
n (county and
e cities of Alis
Woods, Lake
rano, and Calt
DT. The PDT
and constrain
re conducted
eetings, largeboards presen
cluded the id
k, existing an
and collabora
e discussions
undtable occ
regional bikew
anking evalua
ees included
ctors, bicycle
escribing the
provided. Th
mately 50 peo
A
the
key
rst
on
ree
the
the
nd
the
ree
the

S STRATEG
ransportation
litating the re
s organized w
d city) within
so Viejo, Dan
Forest, Mis
trans District
T met on mu
nts, prelimina
d with smalle
-format board
nted informat
dentification o
d proposed b
ative brainstor
were held to
curred in Ma
way corridors
ation criteria
public stakeh
shop owner
planning pro
he second ro
ople with boa
GY
Authority
egional bikew
with planning a
Supervisoria
na Point, Irvin
ssion Viejo,
t 12. OCTA
ultiple occasio
ary corridor
er working g
ds were print
tion to help f
of flood cont
bikeways, ma
rming.
o provide an
ay 2014 dur
s was made a
a, and their
holders from
rs, as well as e
cess and larg
oundtable occ
ards showing
EXEC
KOA
way discussio
and engineeri
al District 5.
ne, Laguna B
Rancho San
staff and the
ons to discuss
alignments,
roups of PD
ted for brain
frame bikewa
rol channels
ajor destinatio
opportunity f
ring National
and public inp
top three d
m the bicycle
elected officia
ge-format boa
curred in Sep
the top thre

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
n in preparin
ing represent
These includ
each, Laguna
nta Margarita
project cons
s project goa
and draft ra
DT representa
storming pot
ays demand, n
and rail corr
ons, and othe
for public inp
Bike Month
put was requ
desired corr
advocacy, h
als and comm
ards displayin
ptember 201
ee ranked re
MARY
3 ng the
tatives
de the
Hills,
a, San
ultant
ls and
anking
atives.
tential
needs,
ridors,
er key
put on
h. A
uested
ridors.
health,
munity
ng the
4 and
gional

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and ro
ad
 A
R
re
in
 A
as
bi
 A
o
as
I.III Reg
As shown
viability o
proposed
superviso
existing b
more det
parallel o
alignment
 C
so
La
fin
 C
C
co
 C
Pa
C
 C
Pa
w
A
oundtables w
dvertisement
A project
Ride/Bike/Dist
egularly with
nformation.

An online que
sking respond
icycling prefe
A second ques
n the propos
sked to rank
ional Corr
n in Figure ES
f bicycling and
corridors pr
rial districts
ikeway facilit
ailed analysis
r adjacent st
ts evaluated in
Corridor A
outh along PC
antern Street
nally along El
Corridor B
Canyon Road
ontinues to P
Corridor C –
arkway from
Canyon Road
Corridor D
arkway from
west of Palom
Antonio Parkw
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
was conduct
s on OCTA a
webpage w
trict-5-Bikewa
h project ma
estionnaire w
dents to gaug
rences and fr
stionnaire wa
sed corridor
the top three
ridors
S.1, a total of
d cross-jurisd
rovide conne
and between
ies and new
during the fe
treets that pr
n this Strategy
– Pacific C
CH from the
t, down to D
Camino Real
– Laguna C
from the Su
PCH.
– El Toro/A
Santa Marga
(State Route
– Portola/S
the Supervis
ma, and conti
way.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ted by mea
and city webs
was created
ays-Roundtab
aterials, inclu
was promote
ge attendees’
requency. Alm
as distributed
rs. It include
e corridors. T
f nine region
dictional bikew
ctions to oth
n major poin
proposed seg
easibility stud
rovide a mor
y are the follo
Coast Highw
southern Ne
Dana Point Ha
l to the south
Canyon – T
upervisorial D
licia/Laguna
arita, onto P
133) to Broa
Santa Marg
sorial Distric
nues along S

S STRATEG
ransportation
ans of dire
sites, OCTA’s
d on OC
ble). It inclu
uding meetin
d online and
level of bicy
most 200 que
online and a
ed a map of
There were
al bikeway co
way connecti
her regional b
nts of interes
gments. The e
y phase. For
re feasible ro
owing:
way (PCH)
ewport Beach
arbor Drive,
hern San Juan
This 8.8-mile
District 5 bo
a Canyon –
Paseo de Vale
adway Street,
garita – Thi
ct 5 boundary
Santa Margari
GY
Authority
ect emails t
s “On the Mo
CTA’s webs
uded a projec
ng materials,
d distributed
ycling comfor
stionnaires w
at the second
the propose
150 questionn
orridors are
vity througho
bikeway corri
st. These cor
exact corrido
example, cor
oute. The pro
– This 20-m
h city bounda
along Park L
n Capistrano c
e north-south
oundary in Irv
This 15.3-mil
encia, to El T
and ending a
s 6.7-mile co
ry at the wes
ita Parkway t
EXEC
KOA
to over 1,0
ove” blog, and
ite (www.o
ct overview
, meeting da
at the first
rt and gather
were complet
d roundtable
ed corridors.
naires comple
proposed to
out south Or
dors establis
rridors are c
or alignments
rridors may b
oposed corri
mile north-so
ary, along De
Lantern to C
city limit.
h corridor r
vine at the I
le corridor ex
Toro Road, t
at PCH in Lag
orridor exte
stern city lim
to Avenida E

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
000 stakeho
d social media
octa.net/Share
that was up
ates, and co
public round
r input about
ed.
to solicit fee
Participants
eted.
o help improv
range County
hed in neighb
comprised of
s may change
be realigned t
dors and cor
uth corridor
el Prado to G
oast Highway
runs along L
-405 Freewa
xtends along
then along L
guna Beach.
nds along Po
mit of Lake F
Empresa, end
MARY
4 olders,
a.
e-thepdated
ontact
dtable
t their
dback
were
ve the
. The
boring
f both
upon
to use
rridor
r runs
Golden
y, and
Laguna
ay and
Alicia
Laguna
ortola
orest,
ing at

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and  C
th
R
pa
 C
M
al
pa
R
R
La
T
al
co
to
 C
W
D
 C
fr
to
 C
fr
Corridor E –
he Supervisor
Road, to El T
arallel to El T
Corridor F –
Muirlands Bou
long the Alis
arallel to Pas
Road and the
Road to the La
a Zanja Stree
Trail, to the Sa
long a propo
ontinue along
o Palisades D
Corridor G
Woodfield and
Drive.

Corridor H
rom Avenida
o El Camino R
Corridor I –
rom Antonio
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
– Aliso Cree
rial District 5
oro Road at
Toro Road an
– Muirlands
ulevard from
so Creek Bik
eo de Valenc
Cabot-Forbe
aguna Niguel
et, then onto
an Juan Creek
sed bikeway
g Via Californ
rive and dow
– Oso Park
d continues a
– Antonio/L
De Las Flore
Real.
– San Juan C
Parkway dow
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ek – This 20
5 boundary
Ridgeline Ro
d ends at PC
s/Cabot/Cam
the Supervi
ke Path at Lo
cia, then on P
es bike path a
Metrolink Sta
Avenida De
k Trail along
currently in
nia and Via Fo
wn to PCH.
kway – This
along Oso Pa
La Pata/Pic
es and continu
Creek – Thi
wn to PCH.

S STRATEG
ransportation
.3-mile corrid
in Modjeska
oad, continue
H.
mino Capis
sorial Distric
os Alisos Bo
Paseo de Vale
at Rapid Falls
ation, crossin
La Vista. It p
Camino Capi
development
ortuna to Via
s 8.9-mile co
arkway to its
o – This 18-
ues along La
s 8.6-mile co
GY
Authority
dor runs alon
Canyon at a
es along the
strano– This
ct 5 boundar
oulevard. It
encia at Lagun
Road. From
ng over to Ca
picks up from
istrano to acc
t that would
Sacramento,
orridor runs
s eastern end
-mile corrido
Pata Avenue,
orridor exten
EXEC
KOA
ng Santiago C
approximately
Class I Aliso
s 18-mile co
ry east of Ba
continues alo
na Hills Drive
m there, it ext
amino Capistr
m there on th
cess San Juan
connect to A
then along C
along Pacific
d at Bend Ro
or runs along
, then onto A
nds along San

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
Canyon Road
y Bolero Loo
o Creek bike
orridor runs
ake Parkway,
ong the bike
e, and onto C
tends along F
rano, continu
he Trabuco C
Creek Road
Avenida Calif
Camino Capis
c Park Drive
oad/Coto De
g Antonio Par
Avenida Pico
n Juan Creek
MARY
5 from
okout
e path
along
, then
e path
Cabot
Forbes
ing to
Creek
, then
fornia,
strano
from
Caza
rkway
down
k Trail

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Pacific
Ocean
0 1.25 2.5 5
Miles
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
ORTEGA
ALICIA
OSO

EL TORO

ANTONIO
LA PAZ

MOULTON

MARGUER TI E

N GI UEL

JERONIMO

LOS AL SI OS

LAGUNA CANYON

CROWN VALLEY

LAKE FOREST
FELIPE

ALISO CREEK
TOLEDO

AVENIDA PICO

OLYMP AI D

EL CAMINO REAL

CAM NI O CAP SI TRANO

DEL OBISPO

SANTA MARGARITA

ROCKFIELD

PACIFIC COAST

MELINDA

LA PATA
SELVA

STONEHILL
ALIPAZ

ALISO VIEJO

PACIFIC PARK

CAMINO DEL AVION
TALEGA

RANCHO VIEJO

SAN JUAN CREEK

PACIFIC ISLAND
VALEN

RIDGELINE

RIDGE ROUTE

AVENIDA LA PATA

GLENN RANCH

H GI HLANDS
AVERY

GLENWOOD

DEL RIO

QUAIL HILL

WOOD CANYON

GLENNEYRE

MARINA HILLS

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

BEACON HILL

DEL PRADO

ALMAALDEA

AVEN DI A DE LAS FLORES

MINO LAS RAMBLAS

VISTA HERMOSA

PLANO TRABUCO

SANTA MARIA

CLUB HOUSE

PASEO DE COLINAS

LAGUNA HILLS

AVEN DI A DE LAS BANDERAS
RANCHO
TRONG

DANA POINT HARBOR

TRABUCO CREEK

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

CAMINO VERA CRUZ

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA
FOREST

SUNNYHILL

PORTOLA

LA PATA

TRABUCO

CAMINO CAPISTRANO
TON

RIDGE ROUTE
RANCHO
UVSR-261
UVSR-241
UVSR-241
UVSR-73
§¨¦I-5
§¨¦I-5
§¨¦I-5
Sand Canyon
Reservoir
Laguna
Reservoir
El Toro
Reservoir
Veeh
Reservoir
Lagunas
Sulphur
Creek
Reservoir
Krum
Reservoir
PalisadesReservoir
C
Sp
Lake
Mission
Viejo
COUNTY
IRVINE
LAKE
FOREST

MISSION
VIEJO
SAN

CLEMENTE
COUNTY
LAGUNA
NIGUEL

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
LAGUNA
BEACH
ALISO
VIEJO
DANA
POINT
HILLS
COUNTY
LAGUNA
WOODS

RANCHO SANTA

MARGARITA
SUNN
VU
VU
I
Transportation CenterRailSchoolsCollegesParks / Open SpaceWaterbodyCity BoundarySupervisorial District 5 nm
nm
n¤
LEGEND
Source: OCTA
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative

PROJECT CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Figure ES-1

BIKEWAY CORRIDORS
n
TRA
RID
Pacific Coast Hwy
Laguna Canyon Rd
Pacific Coast Hwy
Cabot Rd
Muirlands
Oso Pkwy
Alicia Pkwy
Oso Pkwy
Camino Capistrano
Creek Trail
Trabuco
Ave. California
Via
Sacramento
Coast Hwy
Pico
La Pata
Antonio Pkwy
Antonio Pkwy
Santa Margarita
Portola
Aliso Creek Trail
Aliso Creek Trail
El Camino Real
Dana Point Harbor
Laguna Canyon Rd
Laguna Canyon Rd
El Toro Rd
Paseo De Valencia
Paseo De Valencia
San Juan Creek Trail
Pacific Coast Highway CorridorLaguna Canyon CorridorEl Toro/Alicia CorridorPortola/Santa Margarita CorridorAliso Creek CorridorMuirlands/Cabot Corridor/Camino CapistranoOso Parkway CorridorAntonio/La Pata/Pico CorridorSan Juan Creek Corridor F
D
B
H
I
E
C
A
G
F
F
D
B
B
H
H
H
I
E
E
A
A
G
G
C
C
C

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 460
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Each corr
from crit
criteria co
The evalu
 T
 Le
 R
 P
 P
 C
 C
 Ec
Table ES.
each cate
account fo
The regio
improvem
potential
safety, wh
implemen
phase of t
 C
 C
 C
Each of th
least one
the other
continuing
Table ES.
shows the
ridor was eva
eria specified
onsider a rang
uation criteria
Trip Demand
evel of Traffic
Reported Coll
ublic Support
hysical Const
Completes the
Completes the
conomic Effic
1 summarize
egory were c
or normalizin
onal corrido
ments. The ev
benefit to bic
hile also poss
ntation. The f
the District 5
Corridor A:

Corridor C:

Corridor F: M
he District 5
of these thre
r six corrido
g the efforts o
2 summarize
e distance of
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
aluated using
d in OCTA’s
ge of opport
a include the f
c Stress (LTS)
isions
t
traints
e Corridor
e Network
ciency
es the ranking
calculated usi
ng between 0
rs were ran
valuation proc
cyclists in ter
essing signific
following top
Bikeways Str
Pacific Coast
El Toro/Alicia
Muirlands/Ca
cities, the C
ee corridors.
ors, cities m
of the Strateg
es criteria ran
each corrido
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
criteria con
2009 CBSP
unities, const
following cate
)
g evaluation,
ng a method
and 100 and
nked to help
cess determin
ms of regiona
cant public su
ranked corr
rategy:

Highway
a/Laguna Can
bot/Camino C
County of Or
While feasi
ay advance t
gy.
nking results
r and range o

S STRATEG
ransportation
sistent with
and District
traints, and ot
egories:
with raw an
dology descri
the weighting
p guide impl
ned which co
al connectivit
upport and lim
idors will be
nyon
Capistrano
range, and Ca
bility review
the study of
for the nine
of cost.

GY
Authority
District 5 go
t 1, 2 and 4
ther factors a
nd weighted
bed in Chap
g of each crit
lementing ag
orridors wou
ty, access to
mited physica
further stud
altrans have j
is not immed
f any corrido
e proposed c
EXEC
KOA
oals and objec
Bikeways C
affecting dem
scores show
pter 3.2. The
terion.
gencies in pr
ld provide th
key destinatio
al constraints
ied for feasib
jurisdiction o
diately being
or where th
corridors wit

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
ctives and bu
Collaboratives
mand and feas
n. Raw score
e weighted s
rioritizing bik
he greatest re
ons, and imp
s that could h
bility in the se
over portions
provided for
here is intere
thin District
MARY
7 uilding
s. The
ibility.
es for
scores
keway
elative
roved
hinder
econd
s of at
r all of
est in
5 and

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table ES
Cr
B
Possib

A PCH C
B Laguna
C El Toro
Laguna
D
Portola
Margar
E Aliso C
F
Muirlan
Camino
G Oso Pa
H
Antoni
Pata/Pi
I San Jua
Note: RS = Ra
Table ES
Corridor
ID
A
C
F
D
B
E
G
H
I
TOTAL
S.1: Corrido
riteria
Best
ble Score
T
Corridor
a Canyon
o/Alicia/
a Canyon
a/Santa
rita
Creek
nds/Cabot /
o Capistrano
arkway
o/La
co
an Creek
aw Score; WS = We
S.2: Corrido
Corrid
PCH
El Toro/Alicia
Canyon
Muirlands/Ca
Capistrano
Portola/Santa
Laguna Canyo
Aliso Creek
Oso Parkway
Antonio/La P
San Juan Cre
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
or Scoring Score
Level
of
Traffic
Stress
Tot. RS WS
100 4.0 20
70 4 19
54 4 20
65 4 20
59 4 20
50 1 6
60 2 12
48 4 19
44 3 17
38 1 3
eighted Score
or Ranking
dor Name
a/Laguna
abot/Camino
a Margarita
on
y
Pata/Pico
ek
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Reported
Collisions
Ec
Ef

RS WS R

3.0 20 6
3 20
1 9 0
2 16 2
1 7
0 1 5
1 8 6
0 3
1 7
0 0 5
Rank
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 S STRATEG
ransportation
conomic
fficiency
T
Dem

RS WS RS
.4 15 343.6
1 2 280
0 1 209
2 4 289
1 1 317
5 11 261
6 15 344
1 2 277
1 1 245
5 12 313
Weigh
GY
Authority
Trip
mand
Publi
Input

WS RS W
6 15 96 1
0 12 96 1
9 9 62 6
9 13 21 2
7 14 19 2
11 58 6
4 15 47 5
7 12 13
5 11 23 2
3 14 22 2
hted Score
70 65
60 59
54 50
48 44
38 EXEC
KOA
c
t
Completes
the
Network
P

WS RS WS
10 1.7 5
10 1 3
6 1 2
2 1 4
2 2 5
6 1 4
5 1 3
1 1 4
2 1 2
2 1 3
Length (miles

19.0 15.3

17.9 6.7

8.8 20.3

8.9 18.0

8.6 123.5

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
Physical
Constraints
Co
ple
th
Co
rid

RS WS RS
3 10 0%
12 2 0
29 1 0
20 1 0
6 5 0
3 10 0
21 1 0
16 2 0
20 1 0
11 2 0
s) Cost R
(millio
$11.5 –
$12.2 –
$7.4 –
$6.5 –
$8.4 – $
$8.2 – $
$5.5 –
$11.1 –
$3.8 –
$74.6 –
MARY
8 ometes
he
ordor
WS
5 1
5 5
5 1
1 5
2 1
Range
ons)
$14.1
$15.0
$9.0
$8.0
$10.3
$10.0
$6.8
$13.5
$4.6
$91.3

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and I.IV Nea
In an effo
Strategy
proposed
acquisitio
projects m
street to
Each juris
OCTA ca
grant app
to implem
I.V Fund
Funding a
at improv
and that t
transport
competiti
Most fede
often req
of fundin
appointed
specifying
A summa
requireme
sources to
I.VI Pro
Non-infra
and evalua
through p
users. Ba
are provi
proposed
ar-Term A
ort to build m
recommends
corridors
n, and minim
may include r
designate it a
sdiction will
an provide su
lication guida
ment linkages
ding Strate
ssistance can
ving bicycle in
the proper pr
ation funding
on between j
eral funding r
uires similar f
g, a full-time
d. Bicycle coo
the project d
ary table by
ents associat
o implement
grams
astructure bic
ation (four of
policy develo
ased on comm
ded in this S
corridors.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Action Plan
momentum t
s potential n
can be imp
mal environm
restriping a s
as a Class III b
lead funding
upport to the
nce, and desi
simultaneous
egies
be provided
nfrastructure.
rocedures are
is allocated t
jurisdictions t
requires that
funding matc
e bicycle co
ordinators sh
details and ju
y source typ
ted with fund
improvement
cycle program
f the “Five Es
opment and e
munity input
Strategy to co
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
to complete
near-term pr
lemented re
mental review
street to imp
bike route.
and implem
ese jurisdictio
gn solutions.
sly.
through fede
It is importa
e followed in
toward bicyc
to successfully
funds be ma
hes from loca
oordinator w
hould also hav
risdictional ne
pe has been
ding sources
ts along the p
ms, such as ed
” of bicycle p
engineering i
and coordina
omplement t

S STRATEG
ransportation
the regional
rojects. Thes
quiring mini
w as funds
lement a Cla
mentation effo
ons through e
Coordinatio
eral, state, an
ant that comm
applying for
le policy deve
y secure fund
atched by sta
al agencies. T
with extensive
ve a strong c
eeds and opp
n provided w
, to support
proposed cor
ducation, enco
planning - with
mplementatio
ation with ag
he infrastruc
GY
Authority
bikeway net
se potential
mal constru
become ava
ass II bike lan
orts for proj
efforts such a
n between ju
nd local gover
munities are
the grants. B
elopment and
ding.
ate and/or loc
To facilitate th
e knowledge
capability to d
portunities fo
with details
t agency effo
rridors (Chap
ouragement (
h the fifth bei
on to enhanc
gency staff, pr
ture recomm
EXEC
KOA
twork, the D
near-term p
ction costs,
ilable. Examp
ne or providi
ects in their
as providing g
urisdictions is
rnment agenc
made aware
Because only a
d infrastructu
cal municipal
he acquisition
e of funding
develop a com
r bicycle imp
regarding e
orts in findin
pter 6).
(public outrea
ing engineerin
ce the bicycl
rogrammatic
mendations as

CUTIVE SUMM
A Corporation
KTU+A
District 5 Bike
projects alon
low right-o
ples of near
ing signage al
r respective
grant notifica
highly encou
cy programs a
of funding so
a portion of
ure, there is s
ities. State fu
n and coordin
sources is
mpetitive pro
rovements.
ligibility, use
ng outside fu
ach), enforce
ng), work tog
le network f
recommenda
ssociated wit
MARY
9 eways
g the
of-way
r-term
ong a
areas.
ations,
uraged
aimed
ources
public
strong
unding
nation
often
oposal,
e, and
unding
ement,
gether
for all
ations
th the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

1.0 IN
This docu
regional b
(“the Str
implemen
effort bet
potential
was estab

1.1 Back
The Distr
involving
cities of A
Forest, M
This proc
then for S
grant rec
provided
Superviso
Regional
plans, suc
Strategy.

They also
bikeways
 Su
 A
 P
 Pa
The CBS
centers, a
potential
coordinat
coordinat
NTRODU
ument summa
bikeways thro
rategy”) is to
nting regional
tween the lo
regional bikew
blished to out
kground
rict 5 Bikeway
OCTA, local
Aliso Viejo, D
Mission Viejo,
cess began in
Supervisorial
eived by the
by the Or
orial District 5
bikeway plan
ch as the Lon
These goals
o build on the
planning, as f
uggesting reg
Assisting in co
roviding plann
articipating in
SP outlines “
and major em
District 5 re
ted by OCTA
tion with Calt
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
UCTION
arizes the rec
oughout sout
o coordinate
lly-beneficial
ocal agencies
ways that cou
tline potential
ys Strategy w
jurisdictions
Dana Point, Irv
Rancho Sant
2011 with a
Districts 1 &
e Orange Co
range Count
5 boundaries.
nning efforts
ng Range Tra
include expa
e 2009 Comm
follows:
ional prioritie
ordinating pla
ning and desig
n outreach eff
“regional prio
mployment ar
egional bikew
A, local juris
trans and OC
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
N
commendatio
th Orange Co
e planning a
bikeways. Th
and commu
uld best serve
next steps fo
was developed
, and public s
vine, Laguna
ta Margarita,
pilot effort f
& 2 in west ce
ounty Counci
ty Transport
support the
ansportation
anding travel
muter Bikewa
es for optima
ans between
gn guidelines;
forts to enco
ority location
reas. These r
way corridor
dictions will
CTA as neede

S STRATEG
ransportation
ons and nearounty. The o
and funding
he recomme
nity stakehol
e bicyclists of
or completing
d as part of O
stakeholders.

Beach, Lagun
San Clement
for Superviso
entral Orang
l of Governm
tation Autho
goals conta
Plan and the
choices, imp
ys Strategic P
l use by local
jurisdictions;
; and
urage bicycle
ns”, including
regional prior
s. While th
bring projec
ed.

GY
Authority
-term action
bjective of th
efforts betw
endations are
lders. The S
f varying skill
g the regiona
OCTA’s regio
. The Count
na Hills, Lagun
te, and San J
orial District
ge County in
ments (OCC
ority (OCTA
ined in exist
e Orange Co
proving safety
Plan (CBSP) w
jurisdictions
e commuting.
g colleges an
rities served
his planning p
cts from con

1.0 KOA
plan for the
he District 5
ween the va
e the result
Strategy focu
levels. A nea
al bikeway net
onal bikeways
ty of Orange,
na Niguel, Lag
uan Capistra
4 in norther
2012. It is fu
COG), with a
A). Figure 1
ting countyw
ounty Sustain
y, and suppo
which outline
;
nd universiti
as the basis
process has
ncept to con
0 INTRODUCT
A Corporation
KTU+A
implementati
Bikeways Str
arious entitie
of a collabo
uses on ident
ar-term action
twork.
s planning pro
, Caltrans, an
guna Woods,
ano were invo
rn Orange Co
unded by a fe
a 20% local m
.1 illustrates
wide transport
able Commu
rting sustaina
es OCTA’s ro
es, transport
for developin
been initiated
struction, th
TION
10 ion of
rategy
es for
orative
tifying
n plan
ocess:
nd the
, Lake
olved.
ounty,
ederal
match
s the
tation
unities
ability.
oles in
tation
ng the
d and
rough

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Pacific
Ocean
RAITT

IRVINE TCITY HE

ANAHEIM

GYPSUM CANYON

QUAIL HILL
ROSE
4TH

ANAHEIM
GLENN
RANCH
KNOTT
SHADY
CANYON

WESTMINSTER

ANAHEIM

WHITAKER

HER VISTAMOSA
HOLT

MANCHESTER

ORANGEWOOD

LINCOLN

RIO VISTA
17TH

EDWARDS
BOLSA
CARSON

ROSECRANS
LAPATA
LEWIS

RUSSELL
MAIN

ECKHOFF
WAGNER

GLASSELL

WARNER ROCKFIELD
PALM
KASS
15TH
MACY
FRENCH
LOS
ALISOS
PUENTE

ORANGE OLIVE

KATELLA

FAIRVIEW
I
RV
IN
E
EUCLID
MARINA
DEL
MAR

SAYBROOK

JUNIPERO SERRA
WILSON

ESPLANADE
CAMPUS
5TH
E
S
P
E
RAN
ZA
BIRCH

BROWNING

SANTIAGO
BOND

NEWLAND

LEXINGTON
SA
NTA
ANA

JEFFERSON
YAL
E
MIRA
LOMA
DALE
WALNUT
17TH

RIVERDALE

VALLEY VIEW
9TH
PACI
F
IC
ISLA
N
D
EL
R
C
E
A
A
MINO L

NUTWOOD

WESTWOOD

PRAIRIE

GARDEN GROVE
PARKER

VALLEY VIEW

BUFFALO

MELROSE
NEW
PORT

ALGONQUIN

BUSHARD

ORANGETHORPE

AVENIDA LA PATA

KRAEMER

IMPERIAL
CAR
L
S
O
N
BERRY

FAIRMONT
TAFT
WALKER

TURTLE ROCK
M
A
R
G
U
ERITE
16TH
TALEGA
YALE

SUNKIST
GRAHAM

LA VETA

CHAPMAN
RANCHO

WOOD CANYON
GRAND
WANDA
WARD

LA HABRA

BUENA VISTA
WALNUT

MALVERN
PALM
DYER

SANTA CLARA

PLANO TRABUCO
ACACIA

PLACENTIA

PACIFIC
VIEW
HASTER
22ND

VIA LIDO
MAIN
BEACH

SANTA ANA CHESTNUT
SOUTH

AVENIDA DE

LA CARLOTA

STANTON
5TH

PACIFIC COAST
DODGE

CRESCENT
ELLIS
VO
N
KAR
M
A

N LOS ALAMITOS

BROOKHURST

FOOTHILL

CROWTHER

GILBERT

LA PALMA

SANTIAGO CANYON

MADISON

TECHNOLOGY

EASTWOOD
OSO
HOLDER

BLUE GUM
BR
EA

MICHELSON
HARBOR

TRABUCO

CAMBRIDGE

ALVIISO EJO
OSO
MEATS
GISLER

VERA CRUZ

ARLINGTON

EL CAMINO REAL

SUNFLOWER
32ND

PACIFIC COAST

BOLSA CHICA
HOWELL
BAKER

PORTOLA
MAIN

SANTIAGO CANYON

HOSPITAL

GENE AUTRY PORTOLA
CABOT

SAN JUAN CREEK

BLOOMFIELD
TU
ST
I
N
R
A
N
C
H
ELLIS

SANTIAGO

MUIRLANDS

MIRALOMA

LA MIRADA

JAMBOREE
FAIR
4TH
OLD
IRVINE
S
A
N
D
CA
N
Y
O
N

RED HILL

YORBA BRYAN
H
ARVAR
D

LAKEVIEW
MABURY

BARRANCA

PROSPECT
RANCHO

RICHFIELD

ANTONIO
TUSTIN
CULVE
R

WEIR CANYON

CLEMENTINE
HYLAND
DOVE
R
SERRA
N
O

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

RIDGE ROUTE ALTON
WEST

HAMILTON

FRONTERA

UNIVERSITY

PAULARINO

WESTERN

ASSOCIATE
D

SAN JOAQUIN HILLS
FLOWER
D
E
L
O
B
S
I
P
O
N
EWPORT

BRISTOL
HOOVER

RIDGELINE

MESA VERDE

STANDARD

AVENIDA PICO

COMMONWEALTH
EAST
LAKE
BONITA
CANYON

HANDY CREEK
DORY

BRISTOL

SPRING CCRAWFORD ANYON

CANYON LAGUNA
COAST

BREA CANYON
SOUTH
N
EW
PO
RT
C
OA
S
T
CLUB
HOUSE
TOLEDO

SEAPOINT

VALENCIA
17TH

BERKELEY

DELAWARE

FAIRHAVEN

SYCAMORE
RAM
PART
19TH
BALL

WHITTIER
SELVA

PIONEER

CANYON RIM
HEIL

ASSOCIATED
SANTA

MARGARITA

ATLANTA

GARFIELD

METROPOLITAN

RAYMOND
DALE

SANTA CRUZ
1ST

PLACENTIA

UNIVERSITY

MAGNOLIA

IRVINE CENTER

INDIANAPOLIS

SPRINGDALE
LEMON

SANTIAGO
ADAMS
BEAR

CENTRAL

BERKELEY

VILLA PARK

PROSPECT
MEMORY

CAMINO CAPISTRANO
SAN
MIGUEL
M
A

RGUERITE

YORKTOWN

YORBA LINDA
SHADY
CANYON
YA
L
E
WALNUT

BEACON HILL
M
ACART
H
U

R SEGERSTROM SAKIOKA

VICTORIA

FAIRMONT

SOUTH COAST

TALBERT
TAFT

SEAL BEACH
OHIO

BASTANCHURY
GROVE
BALBOA

TUSTIN RANCH
STAGE
YA
L
E
BEACH
MEMORY

BANNING
T
RABU
CO
C
R
E
E
K
WALNUT
CREEK
N
IGUEL
HEWES
ALTON

CABRILLO PARK

CARBON CANYON
MESA

LAMPSON
PARKS
LAKE

JEFFREY

WESTCLIFF

GLASSELL

RANCHO VIEJO
N
EW
P
O
RT
CA
M
INODE
L
O
S
MARES
NE
W
P
O
RT

ARBORWOOD
ORANGE

CROWN VALLEY

ANAHEIM SHORES

KELLOGG
BIRCH
RANCHO
MAR
N
I
A
H
ILLS
KNOTT

DOUGLASS

BROADWAY

ARTESIA

JAMBOREE

DEL RIO

DISNEYLAND

CANYON VIEW
BAKE

NEWPORT CENTER
LA PAZ

HACIENDA
E
L
TO
RO
AVE
N
IDA
DE
LAS
F
L
ORES

PROSPECT

COLLINS
CANNON

TRABUCO CIVIC CENTER
MAIN

MEADOWOOD

BATAVIA

CERRITOS

HIGHLAND
BISON

ROYAL OAK

BROADWAY

PACIFIC COAST

BROWNING ORTEGA

MCFADDEN

ALTAVISTA

ESPLANADE
GOLDEN

LAMBERT

ORANGEWOOD
SLATER
HEIL

VALENCIA

CERRITOS
WARNER

HOUSTON
HEIL

GOLDENWEST
IDAHO
LEWIS
BEACH
DENNI
HAZARD

CHAPMAN
MILLER
YORBA
WARD

STATE COLLEGE

GOTHARD

FLETCHER

TRASK HALLADAY

TALBERT

NEWHOPE
MOODY
BOLSA
ARGOSY
ORANGE
WALNUT

EDINGER

RIDGE ROUTE
ANTON

LA VETA
OAK
CANYON
L
A
KE
F
O
RE
ST

GILBERT

JERONIMO

MOULTON

ARMSTRONG

SANTAANA CANYON
ALICIA

NOHL RANCH

KELLOGG
BRYAN

VILLAGE CENTER

MERRIMAC

ANAHEIM HILLS
FLOWER
CENTER
FORD

CHAPMAN

EASTBLUFF
COAST

BAYSIDE

VALENCIA

SPYGLASS HILL
VIA
ESCOLA
2 PALM
4 3
1 5
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative

ORANGE COUNTY SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS
Figure 1-1

DISTRICT INFORMATION
Source: OCTA
048 2
Miles I
DISTRICT 1
Fountain Valley (Portions of)Garden GroveSanta AnaWestminster DISTRICT 2
Buena Park (Portions of)Costa MesaCypressFountain Valley (Portions of)Huntington BeachLa PalmaLos AlamitosNewport BeachSeal BeachStanton DISTRICT 3
Anaheim (Portions of)Irvine (Portions of)OrangeTustinVilla ParkYorba Linda DISTRICT 4
Anaheim (Portions of)BreaBuena Park (Portions of)ullertonLa HabraPlacentia DISTRICT 5
Aliso ViejoDana PointIrvine (Portions of)Laguna BeachLaguna HillsLaguna NiguelLaguna WoodsLake ForestMission ViejoRancho Santa MargaritaSan ClementeSan Juan Capistrano

7.2.1.b
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting

1.2 Stra
The Strat
unincorpo
alignment
of attract
maintenan
complex i
The repo
criteria a
communit
planning-l
provide t
design and
In an effo
corridors
cost and
Local gov
The Strat
used alon
lanes and
treatment
appropria
The Strat
as well as
Finally, th
sources o

1.3 Bike
Througho
California
fourth ca
California
classificati
ategy Over
egy identifies
orated areas
ts are describ
tions along t
nce roads and
intersections)
ort describes
are based on
ty. The top th
evel design
he informatio
d constructio
ort to facilitat
is outlined i
with few ma
ernmental ag
tegy also con
g these corri
shared-use
ts, signage, a
ate are identif
egy outlines e
public outrea
he Strategy o
of funds for bi
eways Clas
out this repor
a Department
ategory, sepa
a Streets and
ions are illust
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
rview
s nine regiona
within sout
ed in Chapte
he corridor,
d available ro
).
each of the
n goals and
hree corridor
recommenda
on and data
on of sections
te project im
n this report
ajor constrain
encies are alr
nsists of a det
dors in south
markings or
and street m
fied.
educational a
ach are review
outlines fundi
ke infrastruct
ssifications
rt, reference
t of Transpo
rated bikewa
Highways C
trated in Figur
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
al corridors t
th Orange C
er 3. The repo
and the ide
oad right-of-w
eight criteria
objectives de
rs have been
ations for ke
required for
s of each corr
mplementation
t. The plan r
nts such as s
ready working
tailed discuss
hern Orange C
“sharrows”
markings. Sec
pproaches fo
wed.
ing strategies
ture and educ
is made to fo
ortation (Calt
ays or cycle
Code (SHC) S
re 1.2 and su

S STRATEG
ransportation
to serve as th
County. The
ort includes a
entification of
way) and cons
a used to ass
eveloped wit
selected for
ey sections o
local jurisdic
ridor.
n, a high-leve
ecommends
slope, enviro
g on many of
sion of the v
County. Facil
to separated
ctions of the
r bicyclists an
s and points
cational proje
our classes o
trans) used t
tracks, has
Section 890.4
mmarized be
GY
Authority
he backbone
ese corridors
an overview o
f opportuniti
straints (e.g. s
sess and rank
th input from
a follow-up f
of each corri
ctions to pre
el near-term
implementing
onmental con
f the items ide
various types
lities covered
d paths, cycle
e corridors w
nd motorists.
to a variety
ects.
r categories o
three categor
recently bee
4 defines the
low:

1.0 KOA
bikeway netw
s and the r
of current co
ies (e.g. exist
significant inc
k the regiona
m the local
feasibility stud
idor. The fe
epare grant ap
action plan
g items that
ncerns, or lac
entified in the
of bike facili
d in this sectio
e tracks, com
where these
. Classes for c
y of public, a
of bikeways.
ries for bikew
en added to
four bikeway
0 INTRODUCT
A Corporation
KTU+A
work for citie
rationale for
onditions, high
ting flood ch
clines/ decline
al corridors. T
agencies an
dy that will in
asibility stud
pplications fo
for all nine o
are relatively
ck of right-of
e plan.
ities that cou
on range from
mplex interse
e facilities ma
children and a
as well as pr
Until recentl
ways. Howev
the classific
y. These bik
TION
12 es and
their
hlights
hannel
es and
These
d the
nclude
y will
or the
of the
y lowf-way.
uld be
m bike
ection
ay be
adults
rivate,
y, the
ver, a
cation.
keway

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and  C
sh
 C
an
m
 C
ac
ro
lo
 C
th
la
A mo

1.4 Juris
While OC
led by th
managed
interchang
While OC
design, co
respective
coordinat
way acqui
Class I – Off-S
hared by bicy
Class II – Onnd stencils to
more predicta
Class III – O
ccommodate
oadways; how
ower speeds a
Class IV Bikew
he user exper
anes.
ore detailed d
sdictional G
CCOG and O
e cities or th
by Caltrans,
ges.

CCOG and O
onstruction, a
e jurisdictions
te with vario
isition.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Street Paved B
clists and ped
Road Striped
o delineate the
ble movemen
On-Road Sha
vehicles and
wever, for saf
and traffic vo
ways - Separat
rience of a se
escription is i
Governanc
OCTA comm
he County o
, such as po
OCTA promo
and maintena
s as outlined
us landowner
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Bike Paths: fa
destrians.
d and Signed B
e right-of-way
nts by each.
ared-Lane Si
d bicycles in
fety purposes
lumes.
ted Bikeways
parated path
in Chapter 5
ce
issioned this
of Orange, w
ortions of Pa
ote the implem
ance of the c
above. Addit
rs such as ut

S STRATEG
ransportation
cilities on a s
Bicycle Lanes
y assigned to
gned Bicycle
the same tra
s, signed bicy
(Cycle Track
with the on-
(Bicycle Facil
report, the i
whomever has
acific Coast
mentation of
corridor wou
tionally, the c
tility compan
GY
Authority
separate right
s: on-street fa
o bicyclists an
e Routes: si
avel lane. B
ycle routes a
ks): exclusive
-street infrast
lity Toolkit).
mplementatio
s jurisdiction.

Highway (St
corridors rec
uld ultimately
cities or the C
ies, rail oper

1.0 KOA
t-of-way from
acilities that u
d motorists,
igned on-str
icycles are p
re often foun
e bike facilitie
tructure of co
on of bikeway
. In some ca
tate Route
commended
y need to be
County of Or
rators, and O
0 INTRODUCT
A Corporation
KTU+A
m roadways, u
use painted s
and to provid
reet facilities
permitted on
nd on streets
es that combin
onventional b
y corridors w
ases, roadway
1), or at fre
in this report
e accepted b
range may ne
OCTA for rig
TION
13 usually
tripes
de for
s that
most
s with
ne
ike
will be
ys are
eeway
t, final
by the
eed to
ght-of7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Figure

BIKEWAY
nge County T

1.2: Caltran

S STRATEG
ransportation
s Bikeway
GY
Authority
Classificatio

1.0 KOA
ns
0 INTRODUCT
A Corporation
KTU+A
TION
14 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

2.0 EX

2.1 Con
The 2009
communit
than in C
lanes alon
change, a
shopping
fewer job
result in
opportun
According
Orange C
by driving
the stree
produced
estimates
percent, b
Range Tra

2.2 Rati
Implemen
air polluti
trips. It so
work, five
dioxide e
(www.dat
Serious o
rate in th
mid 20's
people in
the Oran
bicycling a
Control a
adults abo

XISTING
ntext
9 OCTA C
ties over the
Central Count
ng the shoul
and alignmen
centers. This
b opportuniti
more challen
ities still exist
g to the 201
County’s popu
g alone. This
ets and freew
by the Cen
Orange Cou
by 2035, whi
ansportation
onale
nting bikeway
ions, and imp
olves first mi
e days a wee
emissions eac
ta.worldbank.
besity and dia
e County is o
(www.public
Orange Cou
nge County H
and other ph
and Preventio
out 30 minute
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
G COND
BSP notes t
e last 30 year
ty. The advan
ders. Howev
nts through
s layout often
ies near the
nges for bicyc
t, such as pro
13 American
ulation comm
shows how a
ways are at,
nter for Dem
unty’s 2013 p
ich will only
Plan (www.o
facilities can
proved air qu
le/last mile is
ek, avoids 2,0
ch year, whic
.org).
abetes issues
over 33%, wi
healthadvoca
unty suffer fro
Health Care
hysical activiti
on, children
es per day. B
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
DITION
that much o
rs. The roadw
ntage to thes
ver, these ro
low-density
results in lon
residential c
clists desiring
oviding impro
Community
mutes by bicy
automobile-d
or close to,
mographic Re
population of
put more de
octa.net/LRTP
result in dec
uality and he
ssues for tran
000 miles of
ch is approxi
exist in the U
th most citie
acy.org). As
om diabetes,
Agency, 20
es may help
6 to 17 year
Bicycling can p

S STRATEG
ransportation
S
of south Or
way network
se roads is th
oads typically
communities
nger trips, an
communities.
g to share an
ved access an
y Survey (U.S
ycle. The vast
dependent Or
, maximum c
esearch (out

3.114 million
emand on tra
P/).
reased levels
ealth. Biking
nsit riders. A
driving and (
mately 5% o
US. Orange
s in southern
the graphic
with an incre
14-2016 OC
reduce diabe
rs of age sho
provide much
GY
Authority
range Count
ks are genera
hat many of
y have higher
s with housi
nd the lower
The higher
nd cross the
nd facilities at
S. Census Bu
t majority of
range County
capacity. The
t of Californ
n to grow by
ansportation
s of traffic con
is a viable t
A bicycle com
(in the U.S.)
of the average
County is no
n Orange Co
on the follo
easing numbe
C Health Imp
etes. Accord
ould get one
h of this benef

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
ty was deve
ally wider an
them were d
r speed limit
ng separated
densities con
speed limits
roadways. N
t transit statio
ureau), less t
commuters c
y currently is
e Orange Co
ia State Univ
y nearly 600,0
infrastructur
ngestion, fuel
ransportation
mmuter who r
about 2,000
e American’s
ot immune. T
ounty having r
owing page s
er of them be
provement Pl
ding to the C
hour of exe
ficial exercise

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
eloped as pla
d more circu
designed with
ts, more elev
d from work
nsequently res
s and wider
Nonetheless,
ons.
than 1 perce
commute to
s and why ma
ounty Projec
versity, Fulle
000, more th
re. See 2014
consumption
n option for
rides four mi
pounds of ca
s carbon foo
The overall o
rates in the lo
hows, over 7
eing children
lan). Encou
enters for D
ercise per da
e.

IONS
15 anned
uitous
h bike
vation
k and
sult in
roads
many
ent of
work
any of
ctions,
rton),
han 19
Long
n, and
short
les to
arbon
otprint
besity
ow to
7% of
(from
raging
isease
ay and

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and However,
the roads
United St
represent
occurred
2,857 traf
Data, pub
The Strat
are inten
environm
districts;
centers. T

2.3 Acti

2.3.1 Bic
Bicycle co
the US C
between
national a
, to increase
and bikeway
tates. In 20
ts 2.2% of a
in urban are
ffic fatalities in
blished in Apr
tegy identifies
ded to be d
ental, social,
within those
This effort wil
ivity Levels
cycle Com
ommute mod
Census Burea
0% and 2.7%
average is 0.6%
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
the number
ys. According
12, there we
ll traffic fata
as. In Califor
n 2012”. (Na
ril 2014). Bike
s corridors th
designed for
safety, and ec
boundaries,
ll require coo
s and Colli
mmute Mod
e share by cit
au. Figure 2.
% within the
%.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
of people wh
g to pedbikei
ere 726 bicy
alities during
rnia, there we
ational Highw
e safety has b
hat touch all
and used by
conomic cond
connect ma
ordination am
sion Analy
de Share by
ty is determin
1 illustrates t
District 5 c
Orange Coun
2014-2016 OC

S STRATEG
ransportation
ho bike on a
nfo.org, “Bicy
yclist fatalitie
the year. S
ere 124 bicyc
ay Traffic Saf
become an inc
portions of
y bicyclists o
ditions. The c
ajor points of
mong associate
ysis
y City
ned using Am
that the bicy
cities. The sta
nty Heath Care
Health Improve
GY
Authority
regular basis
ycle trips acco
es and 49,00
ixty-nine per
clist fatalities,
fety Administ
creasing conc
south Orang
of all skill lev
corridors will
f interest, in
ed entities to
merican Comm
ycle mode sh
ate and coun
Agency,
ement Plan

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
s, bicyclists ne
ount for only
00 bicyclist i
rcent of the
representing
tration Traffic
cern over the
ge County's 5
vels and hel
l connect neig
cluding empl
o implement.
munity Surve
hare for all w
nty average

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
eed to feel sa
y 1% of trips
injuries. This
bicyclist fat
g 4.3% of the
c Safety Facts
e years.
5th District.
p improve h
ghboring citie
loyment and
ey (ACS) data
work trips r
is 1.0%, whil
IONS
16 afe on
in the
s data
talities
e total
2012
They
health,
es and
retail
a from
ranges
le the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and 1: U
Not

2.3.2 Es
In order
health, le
needs to
achieve t
bicycling r
the mode
The follow
populatio
trips by b
estimate,
0 0
1 1
2 2
3 US Census Bureau
te: Only the tracts
timated C
to recognize
ss traffic con
be maximize
hese goals o
rates across d
es which resid
wing estimate
ns other than
icycle estimat
based on ava

0.2%
0 0.0%

0.5%
.0%
.5%

2.0%

2.5%
.0%
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Figure 2.1:
: 2009-2013 Amer
s within Superviso
ommuter
e the multipl
ngestion, and
ed. A better
of the Strateg
different popu
dents use for
es include ad
n adults comm
ted in Distric
ailable data an

0.0%

0.7% 0.6
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
: Bicycle Co
rican Community
orial District 5 of I
and Utilita
e benefits of
maintenance
understandin
gy. The U.S
ulations and g
commuting to
ditional utilita
muting to wo
ct 5. It is imp
nd does not in
6%

0.1% 0.2%

S STRATEG
ransportation
ommute Mo
Survey, 5-Year Est
rvine (mix of land
arian Bicyc
f these regio
e of ambient
ng of the num
S. Census’ AC
geographies, a
o and from w
arian trips, su
ork. As show
portant to no
nclude recrea
%

0.8%

0.2%
GY
Authority
ode Share b
stimates
uses)
lists
onal bikeway
air quality le
mber of exis
CS provides
as shown in F
work.
uch as those
wn in Table 2.
ote that this i
ational trips.
%

0.0%

0.6%

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
by City1
corridors, in
evels, the nu
sting bicycle t
useful data
Figure 2.1, bu
trips made fo
1, there are
s simply an o

0.1%

0.3%
0 NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
ncluding imp
umber of bicy
trips is need
for understa
ut they only r
for daily activ
about 25,000
order-of-magn

0.7%

2.7%
IONS
17 roved
yclists
ed to
anding
report
vity by
0 daily
nitude

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 2.

Variable
Existing E
Existing B
Existing N
Commute
Existing W
Existing N
Populatio
Existing N
Bicyclists
Existing T
Existing T
Existing T
Existing S
(Grades K
Existing S
Share
Existing S
Commute
Existing N
Existing C
Existing C
Existing T
Commute
Total Da
1: Bicycle T
e
mployed Pop
Bike-to-Work
Number of Bik
ers
Work-at-Hom
Number of W
n
Number of W
Transit-to-Wo
Transit-to-Wo
Transit Bicycle
chool Childre
K-8)
chool Childre
chool Childre
ers
Number of Co
College Bicycl
College Bike C
Total Number
ers
aily Bicycling
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Trends in Di
pulation
k Mode Share
ke-to-Work
me Mode Shar
Work-at-Home
Work-at-Home
ork Mode Sha
ork Commute
e Commuters
en, Ages 5-14
en Bike Mode
en Bike
ollege Studen
ing Mode Sha
Commuters
r of Bike
g Trips
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
strict 5
Va
290

0.8 1,4
re 8.7
e
25,
e
1,2
are 1.
ers 3,3
s 6
4 41,
e

2.0 82
ts 35,
are 25
8,7
12,
24,

S STRATEG
ransportation
alue Sou
0,934 200
8% 200
460 (Ex
Bik
7% 200
288 (Ex
Wo
264
Ass
mak
1% 200
335 (Ex
Tra
67 Ass
bicy
405 200
0% Nat
28 (Ex
Ch
137 200
.0%
Nat
Cas
784 (Ex
(Est
403 Tot
util
807 Tot
GY
Authority
urce
09-2013 ACS
09-2013 ACS
xisting Employ
ke-to-Work M
09-2013 ACS
xisting Employ
ork-at-Home
sumes 5% of
kes at least o
09-2013 ACS
xisting Employ
ansit-to-Wor
sumes 2% of t
ycle
09-2013 ACS
tional Safe Ro
xisting School
ildren Bicyclin
09-2013 ACS
tional Bicyclin
se Study No.
xisting Numbe
timated Colle
tal bike-to-wo
itarian trips.
tal bicycle co

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
, B08101 5-Y
, B08101 5-Y
yed Populatio
Mode Share)
, B08101 5-Y
yed Populatio
Mode Share)
population w
one daily bicyc
, B08101 5-Y
yed Populatio
k Mode Share
transit riders
, B01001 5-Y
outes to Scho
Children) x
ng Mode Shar
, B14001 5-Y
ng & Walking
I, 1995).
er of College
ege Bicycling
ork, school, c
Does not inc
mmuters x 2

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
Year Estimates
Year Estimates
on) x (Existing
Year Estimates
on) x (Existing
)
working at hom
cle trip
Year Estimates
on) x (Existing
e)
access trans
Year Estimates
ools surveys,
(Existing Scho
re)
Year Estimates
g Study, FHW
Students) x
Mode Share)
college and
clude recreati
(for round t
IONS
18 s
s
g
s
g
me
s
g
it by
s
2010
ool
s
WA,
on
rips)

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

2.3.3 Im
E-bikes ar
areas suc
trips by b
A recent
Portland S
older, (2)
bicycling
people
bikes_in_
“I
it
According
to replace
ride with
work/scho
The study
the e-bike
The incre
Southern
used large
the deman
At the pr
rules and
21200-21
Code 240
equestrian
the local
permits, b
the use o
the use of
mpact of E-B
re gaining po
h as much of
ike versus ca
survey based
State Univers
those comm
difficult, (5)
who need
_North_Amer
I live in a hilly
up the hills. M
g to the surve
e some car tr
less effort.
ool and for lo
y shows that
e purchase; th
eased popula
Orange Cou
ely for comm
nd for bike fa
resent time in
regulations g
212. In additi
016). At the p
n trails, or hi
authority or
by ordinance,
of electric bike
f electric bike
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Bike Techn
opularity in th
f southern O
r as well as u
d study titled
sity suggests
mute over 5
people who
d to carr
rica.pdf
town and wou
My electric assi
ey the major
rips, (2) healt
The study
ocal trips. Th
of the survey
his went to up
rity of e-bike
unty. As show
muting and for
acilities where
n the State o
governing op
on all users m
present time
iking or recre
r governing b
, such operat
es are curren
es as outlined
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
nology
he US with s
Orange Count
se a bike for
“Electric Bik
that people w
miles, (3) liv
don't want t
ry or ha
uld never comm
ist bike makes
reasons peop
th - to increas
also showed
he third larges
y respondent
p to 93% afte
es will help
wn by the Po
r short trips t
e all levels of
of California a
peration of a
must be at lea
electric bikes
eational trails
body of a pub
tion (Californ
ntly being rea
d in the Califo

S STRATEG
ransportation
sales expecte
ty, e-bikes w
exercise and
kes (E-Bikes)
who are likely
e in hilly are
to sweat or
ul items.
mute to work o
s commuting by
ple bought ese physical fit
that the big
st use was for
ts 55% rode t
er purchase.
drive the nu
ortland State
to local store
bicyclists feel
anyone opera
bicycle as o
ast 16 years o
s cannot be o
s, unless it is
blic agency h
nia Vehicle C
assessed. The
ornia Vehicle C
GY
Authority
d to double
will make it ea
recreation.
in the United
y to use e-bi
eas, (4) have
wear special
http://ppms
on a standard
by bike possible
bikes or conv
tness, (3) live
ggest uses fo
r recreation.
their standar
umber of peo
University S
es and restau
l comfortable
ating an elect
utlined in Ca
of age and we
operated on b
within or ad
having jurisdic
Code section
erefore, revie
Code must b

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
over the nex
asier for peo
d States” by J
kes include t
physical limit
l clothes to
s.otrec.us/me
d bike --I would
e.” –Survey R
verted a stan
e or work in a
or e-bikes we
rd bike weekl
ople who us
urvey the e-b
rants. This w
e.
tric bike is su
alifornia Vehi
ear a helmet
bicycle paths o
djacent to a r
ction over su
21207.5). T
ew of the lat
be conducted.

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
xt 5 years. In
ple to make
John MacArth
those who (
tations that m
commute, an
dia/project_fi
dn't be able to
Respondent
dard bike we
a hilly area an
ere commuti
ly or daily pr
se bike facilit
bikes will like
will further inc
ubject to all o
cle Code Sec
(California V
or trails, bike
roadway or u
uch paths or
The laws gove
est laws gove
.

IONS
19 n hilly
short
hur at
1) are
makes
nd (6)
iles/Emake
ere (1)
nd (4)
ing to
ior to
ties in
ely be
crease
of the
ctions
Vehicle
eways,
unless
trails
erning
erning

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

2.3.4 Co
Personal
dangerous
facility.

In Orang
(California
improvem
The Strat
curb park
enjoyable
The analy
Statewide
area in th
party at fa
the result

1. R
ca

2. R
th
ed

3. T
w

4. T
Many peo
5, this is t
are almos
As shown
most rece
coincides
increasing
are not av
ollision Ana
safety is a m
s or too clos
ge County, b
a State Wide
ments that wil
tegy has asses
king, slope, an
to the rider,
ysis of bicyclis
e Integrated T
he five-year pe
ault. As show
t of four majo
Right-of-way v
ar pulling out
Riding or drivi
he number o
ducation of b
The third is im
when a motor
The fourth is u
ople assume t
the cause of
st equally at fa
n in Figure 2.
ent year for w
with an incr
g, the overall
vailable.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
alysis
main concern
se to heavy ve
between June
e Integrated
ll help preven
ssed the corr
nd roadway r
while minim
st-involved cr
Traffic Record
eriod. Table
wn in Figure 2
or causes liste
violation repre
in front of a
ng on the wr
one cause of
icyclists can m
mproper turn
vehicle drive
unsafe speed,
hat running s
less than 10%
ault.
3, bicyclist-in
which comple
rease in the n
rate of crash
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
n for all new
ehicular traffi
e of 2013 an
Traffic Reco
nt or minimize
ridors for phy
ight-of-way to
izing threats t
rash data in D
ds System (SW

2.2 presents

2.2, excluding
ed below.
esents nearly
bicyclist.
rong side of t
bicyclist-cau
make a major
ning, which a
er or a bicycli
accounting fo
top signs and
% of all crash
volved crashe
ete data are a
number of pe
hes may in fa

S STRATEG
ransportation
w and existin
ic will discou
nd May of 2
ords System)
e these collisi
ysical constra
o help identif
to their safety
District 5 fro
WITRS) show
s the total cra
g "unknown c
y one quarter
the road repr
used crashes
r difference in
accounts for
st turns in fro
or 12% of all
d stop lights is
es. In this ca
es per year r
available. As s
eople riding b
act be declini
GY
Authority
ng bicyclists.
rage the majo
2014, 17 bicy
. Part of thi
ions and resu
aints, includin
fy the routes
ty.
om 2007-201
ws there were
ashes in Distr
causes", over
r of all crashe
resents 18% o
and fatalities
n their safety.
14% of all c
ont of the oth
crashes.
s a cause of b
ategory moto
ranged from
seen statewid
bikes. Thus w
ing although

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
A bikeway
ority of cyclis
yclists were
s study is id
ulting fatalities
ng freeways, c
that would b
1, obtained fr
e 428 total cr
rict 5 by viola
two-thirds o
es. A good ex
of all crashes.
s. This is a
.
crashes. An
her.
bike-related c
or vehicle dri
74 in 2007 to
de, this upwar
while the num
at the presen

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
perceived a
sts from using
struck and
dentifying pot
s.
channels, railr
be most usefu
rom the Cali
rashes in the
ation categor
f the crashes
xample would
. Statewide,
n area wher
example of t
crashes. In D
ivers and bicy
o 100 in 201
rd trend in cr
mber of cras
nt time those
IONS
20 s too
g that
killed
tential
roads,
ul and
fornia
study
ry and
were
d be a
this is
re the
this is
istrict
yclists
1, the
rashes
hes is
e data

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 2.2
Violation
Automob
Wrong Sid
Unknown
Improper
Unsafe Spe
Traffic Sign
Other Imp
Other Haz
Other Tha
Under the
Unsafe La
Unsafe Sta
Improper P
Pedestrian
Lights
Pedestrian
Following T
Impeding T
Other Equ
Total
1 http://www
2 http://www
3 http://www.
2: Bicycle C
n Category
ile ROW1
de of Road
Turning2
eed
nals and Signs
proper Driving
zardous Violati
an Driver
Influence
ane Change3
rting or Backin
Passing
ROW
Violation
Too Closely
Traffic
uipment
w.nolo.com/legal-en
w.nolo.com/legal-en
.nolo.com/legal-en
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Collisions in
on
ng
ncyclopedia/free-b
ncyclopedia/free-b
ncyclopedia/free-bo
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
District 5, 2
Bicycle
37 33
34 30
34 17
15 6
11 5
4 2
3 2
2 1
1 240
books/beat-ticket-b
ooks/beat-ticket-b
ooks/beat-ticket-b

S STRATEG
ransportation
2007-2011
Vehicle
50 32
21 23
10 14
10 12
1 6
3 2
1 1
186
book/chapter7-5.h
book/chapter7-4.h
book/chapter7-8.ht
GY
Authority
Pedestrian
2 2
html
html
tml

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
n Tota
87 65
58 53
44 31
25 18
12 11
7 4
4 2
2 2
1 1
1 428

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
l
%
Exclu
unkn
24%
18%
14%
12%
8%
7%
5%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
IONS
21 %
uding
own
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Figure 2

2.3.5 Re
Within th
improve b
The plann
occurred
communit
implemen
have been
Major bik
and Dana
the existi
Capistran
signal imp
Del Prad
developed
Drive to
sustainabl

2.2: Causes
Crashes
ecent Agen
he 5th Distric
bicyclist safet
ning of bicyc
in San Clem
ties in Newp
nt new or imp
n implemente
ke design and
a Point. For
ng Class II bi
o to Avenida
provements, a
o, from the
d an assessm
improve mo
e circulation
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
of Bicyclists by Year
ncy Efforts
t, there are
ty, enhance in
cle infrastruc
ente, Dana P
ort Beach. M
proved bicycle
ed by many cit
d constructio
example, the
ke lanes and
a Estacion. In
along with pr
northerly c
ment report f
obility for all
to address bi
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
-Involved
to Improv
many plannin
nfrastructure,
ture through
Point, Irvine,
Many cities h
e facilities. Lo
ties.
n projects ar
e City of San
constructing
Dana Point,
roviding Class
ity limits to
for Laguna C
l uses. The
icycle and nei

S STRATEG
ransportation
Figure 2.
ve Bicycle P
ng and engine
, and support
h general pla
Laguna Beach
ave applied fo
ower-cost bik
re currently i
Clemente is
g a Class I bik
the city is in
s I and II faci
Camino Ca
Canyon Road
Rancho Mis
ighborhood e
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
200
GY
Authority
3: BicyclistPlanning &
eering efforts
t increased b
an updates o
h, Rancho San
for or obtaine
ke facilities su
in progress b
currently in
ke path along
the planning
lities along P
apistrano. T
between El
ssion Viejo d
electric vehicl
07 2008

2.0 EXISTI
KOA
-Involved Cr
Infrastruc
s currently le
icycling withi
or bicycle ma
nta Margarita
ed ATP Cycl
uch as Class I
by cities such
the design st
g El Camino
g stage to pro
Pacific Coast
The City of
Toro Road
development
le componen
2009 2

NG CONDIT
A Corporation
KTU+A
rashes by Y
cture
ed by the cit
in Orange Co
aster plannin
a, and the adj
e 1 grant fun
II bike lane st
h as San Clem
tages of impr
Real from Ca
ovide roadwa
Highway, inc
Laguna Beac
to Canyon A
plan has ad
ts.
2010 2011
IONS
22 Year
ies to
ounty.
ng has
jacent
nds to
triping
mente
roving
amino
ay and
luding
h has
Acres
opted
1 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.0 RE
As shown
corridors
and 3, as w
such as be

3.1 Reg
Regional
PDT Mee
cities, and
consultan
regional c
input thr
presented
The follow
are labele
presented
Efforts ha
expected
constraint
should be
EGIONA
n in Figure 3.
connect to o
well as to the
eaches, parks
ional Corr
corridors we
eting #2, the
d northern ar
t then conso
corridors wer
ough online
d at the PDT
wing provide
ed in no part
d in Section 3
ave been mad
as feasibility
ts and oppor
e expected to
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

AL BIKE
1, the follow
one another
e south in San
, schools, sho
ridors
ere developed
team agreed
rea cities. Eac
lidated the co
re presented
surveys or
meetings.
s a detailed d
ticular order.
.2 for prioriti
de to identify
y studies are
rtunities of ea
help achieve
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
EWAY C
ing nine regio
and to bike f
n Diego Coun
opping, emplo
d through a
d to split the
ch focus grou
orridors ident
and modified
local events
discussion of
The ranking
ization.
y conceptual
e conducted
ach corridor.
e regional con

S STRATEG
ransportation
CORRID
onal bikeway
facilities to th
nty. They pro
oyment, and t
series of foc
e region into
up identified it
tified by the t
d based on th
were obtai
each regiona
g analysis of t
alignments o
to provide
. Therefore,
nnectivity and

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
ORS
corridors ar
he north in O
ovide key con
transit center
cus group me
three focuse
ts own prefer
three groups.
e collaborativ
ned and the
al corridor w
the nine corr
of each corrid
an improve
flexibility in t
continuous l

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
re proposed f
OCTA Super
nnections to p
rs.
eetings and P
ed areas: cen
rred corridor
. At PDT Me
ve input. In a
e results and
within District
ridors, using
dor; howeve
ed analysis a
the alignment
linkage.

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
for District 5
rvisorial Distr
popular attrac
PDT meetings
ntral cities, c
rs. OCTA an
eeting #3, the
addition, the
d comments
t 5. The corr
specific crite
er, refinement
nd review o
t of each cor
DORS
23 5. The
ricts 2
ctions
s. At
oastal
nd the
e draft
public
were
ridors
eria, is
ts are
of the
rridor

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Pacific
Ocean
0 1.25 2.5 5
Miles
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
ORTEGA
ALICIA
OSO

EL TORO

ANTONIO
LA PAZ

MOULTON

MARGUER TI E

N GI UEL

JERONIMO

LOS AL SI OS

LAGUNA CANYON

CROWN VALLEY

LAKE FOREST
FELIPE

ALISO CREEK
TOLEDO

AVENIDA PICO

OLYMP AI D

EL CAMINO REAL

CAM NI O CAP SI TRANO

DEL OBISPO

SANTA MARGARITA

ROCKFIELD

PACIFIC COAST

MELINDA

LA PATA
SELVA

STONEHILL
ALIPAZ

ALISO VIEJO

PACIFIC PARK

CAMINO DEL AVION
TALEGA

RANCHO VIEJO

SAN JUAN CREEK

PACIFIC ISLAND
VALEN

RIDGELINE

RIDGE ROUTE

AVENIDA LA PATA

GLENN RANCH

H GI HLANDS
AVERY

GLENWOOD

DEL RIO

QUAIL HILL

WOOD CANYON

GLENNEYRE

MARINA HILLS

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

BEACON HILL

DEL PRADO

ALMAALDEA

AVEN DI A DE LAS FLORES

MINO LAS RAMBLAS

VISTA HERMOSA

PLANO TRABUCO

SANTA MARIA

CLUB HOUSE

PASEO DE COLINAS

LAGUNA HILLS

AVEN DI A DE LAS BANDERAS
RANCHO
TRONG

DANA POINT HARBOR

TRABUCO CREEK

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

CAMINO VERA CRUZ

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA
FOREST

SUNNYHILL

PORTOLA

LA PATA

TRABUCO

CAMINO CAPISTRANO
TON

MISSION
VIEJO
SAN

CLEMENTE
COUNTY
LAGUNA
NIGUEL

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
LAGUNA
BEACH
ALISO
VIEJO
DANA
POINT
HILLS
COUNTY
LAGUNA
WOODS

RANCHO SANTA

MARGARITA
SUNN
VU
VU
I
Transportation CenterRailSchoolsCollegesParks / Open SpaceWaterbodyCity BoundarySupervisorial District 5 nm
nm
n¤
LEGEND
Source: OCTA
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative

SOUTH OC REGIONAL BIKEWAY CORRIDORS
Figure 3-1

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 478
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.1 Co
Overview
The Pacif
Coast Hig
street bik
miles1 lon

6.9 miles
The corri
passes th
Orange, L
Caltrans f
links to
Muirlands
Corridor
novice cy
limited rig
Estimated
bike lanes
major inte
Cliff Drive
Major R
Aside from
would als
Metrolink
1 Corridor leng
as both a class
Leng
Class I
Class II
Class II
T
Cor
orridor A:
w
fic Coast Hig
ghway throu
ke facilities. T
ng, with 14.1
of proposed
idor directly
hrough the f
Laguna Beach
facilities: Coa
o other r
s/Cabot/Cami
A.
yclists from u
ght-of-way or
d construction
s, a new Clas
ersection cro
e and Glenne
Regional De
m San Juan C
so link to th
k Station, and
gth and total miles o
s I off road facility a
gth of Bikeway
Existin
Propos
I
Existin
Propos
I
Existin
Propos
otal Bikeway M
rridor Length (m
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Pacific Coa
ghway Corrid
gh a combin
The corridor
miles of exis
bike facilities
connects to
following jur
h, Dana Poin
ast Highway 1
regional bik
ino Capistran
using the fac
r on-street pa
n costs for th
ss I bike path
ossings, range
eyre Street, as
stinations
Creek, parks,
he Laguna A
beach resort
of bikeway facilities
and class II bike lan
y Facilities (Mi
ng
sed 0
ng 4
sed 5
ng 7
sed 0
Miles 2
miles) 1
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ast Highwa
dor runs alo
nation of onr is approxim
sting bike fac
.

OCTA Distr
risdictions: C
nt, and San C
, State Route
keway corr
no, San Juan
O
Th
lo
bi
ex
ea
re
bi
co
fa
A
in
in
ility. The hig
arking pose in
he Pacific Coa
along PCH i
e from $11.5
s alternative r
and beaches
rt Museum a
ts.
along a corridor oft
es. Total corridor le
les)

1.6 0.8

4.6 5.7

7.9 0.4

21.0 9.0

S STRATEG
ransportation
ay
ng Pacific
- and offmately 19
ilities and
rict 2 and
County of
Clemente. It
e 133, and Int
ridors inclu
Creek, and
Opportunitie
he majority
ocated in coas
cyclists of al
xceptions, its
asily accessibl
egional conn
keway corrid
orridor, such
cility is separ
major chall
stalling Clas
teraction bet
gh number of
ncreased risks
ast Highway c
n the City of
to $14.1 mi
routes to usin
along the co
and South C
ften differ as segme
ength is measured in

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
t also includ
terstate 5 Fre
uding Lagun
Antonio/La P
es, Constra
of the Pacifi
stal beach cit
l levels of ex
s relatively fl
le and ride-ab
nectivity, link
dors. At ma
h as at the I
rated from au
enge to com
s II and III
tween autom
f street inte
s to cyclists u
corridor incl
f Dana Point,
llion. Adjacen
ng PCH.
orridor, the P
Coast Theatr
nts of the corridor m
n center line miles.

Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
des or inters
eeway. The c
na Canyon,
Pata/Pico. Fig
aints, and Es
ic Coast Hig
ties and attra
xperience. W
at terrain m
ble. The corr
king to five
ajor junction
nterstate 5
tomobile traf
mpleting the
I on-street
mobiles and bi
rsections and
using the corr
uding new an
, one bridge c
nt streets can
Pacific Coast
re, Dana Co
may have more tha
 County o
 Laguna Be
 Dana Poin
 San Clem
 Beach citi
 Museums
shopping
 Dana Cov
 San Clem
 Beach res
$11.5

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
ects the follo
corridor has
, Aliso C
gure 3.2 illust
stimated Co
ghway Corrid
acts avid and
With some no
akes the cor
ridor provide
e other reg
points alon
Freeway, the
ffic.
corridor inv
bikeways, as
icyclists may
d segments h
ridor.
nd updated C
crossing, and
n be used, su
Highway Cor
ve, San Clem
an one type of facilit
of Orange
each
nt
mente
ies
, theaters, parks
ve
mente Metrolink
sorts
5-$14.1 million
DORS
25 owing
direct
Creek,
trates
osts
dor is
social
otable
rridor
es key
gional
g the
e bike
volves
s the
deter
having
Class II
eight
uch as
rridor
mente
ty, such
s,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and COUNTY
COUNTY

IRVINE COUNTY
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA

HILLS MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH
EL
TORO

LAGUNA CANYON

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA

AVENIDA VAQUERO

JUNIPERO SERRA

TRABUCO CREEK

WOOD CANYON

ALISO CREEK

GLENWOOD ANTONIO

PACIFIC COAST
ALIPAZ

PACIFIC COAST

GLENNEYRE
FOREST

AVENIDA TALEGA

DEL OBISPO
ALICIA

CLUB HOUSE

MARINA HILLS
SELVA
B
R
O
A
D
WAY

PACIFIC PARK ALISO VIEJO

CAMINO CAPISTRANO
LA PAZ
NIGUEL

RANCHO VIEJO CROW

N VALLEY

STONEHILL

OSO MOULTON

HIGHLANDS

DEL RIO

AVERY MARGUERITE

PASEO DE COLINAS

DEL PRADO
CABOT

EL CAMINO REAL

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA CAMINO DE LOS MARES VERA CRUZ

AVENIDA LA PATA

CAMINO MIRA COSTA

DOHENY PARK

DANA POINT HARBOR

STREET OF THE GOLDEN LANTERN

CAMINO DEL AVION BEACON HILL

PACIFIC ISLAND

SAN JUAN CREEK

LA PATA
ORTEGA

LA NOVIA

AVENIDA PICO

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS
GREENFIELD 73
5 5
Pacific
Ocean
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR A: PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space Figure 3-2
Source: OCTA
LEGEND
R
O
A
D
WAY
Connection to Corridor B
Connection to C
orri
dor
E
Connection to
Corridor I
Con
necti
on to Corridor F Connection to Corridor H
H F
I E
B
FOR
A
D
WAY
Connection to Corridor C
C
Parks within
1/4-mile Served
9 35
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)
53K
Of Total
Corridor Length
19miles
Corridor ABikeway Corridor Details1.6 miles of existing Class I4.6 miles of existing Class II7.9 miles of existing Class III Estimated
Project Cost
$11.5-14.1million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 480
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.2 Co
Overview
The Lagun
west bou
corridor
Road). T
comprised
The corri
runs with
Orange, a
State Rou
bikeway c
Corridor
considere
Route 13
bicyclists.

Most of t
bikeways
segments
widening,
Major R
The Lagu
Laguna Co
Leng
Class
Class I
Class I
T
Co
orridor B: L
w
na Canyon C
undary of Dis
running along
he corridor
d of mostly e
idor directly
hin the follow
and Laguna B
ute 73, State
corridors incl
B.
ed more diffic
33 and having
the cost asso
on the segm
of the roadw
range from $
Regional De
na Canyon C
oast Wildern
gth of Bikeway
I
Exist
Propo
II
Exist
Propo
II
Exist
Propo
Total Bikeway
orridor Length (
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Laguna Ca
Corridor runs
strict 5, with
g State Route
is approxim
xisting Class
connects to
wing jurisdictio
Beach. It also
Route 133, a
uding the El T
cult to bicycle
g a posted
ociated with
ment between
way. Estimated
$8.4 to $10.3
stinations
Corridor wou
ess Park, Cry
y Facilities (Mil
ting 0
osed 0
ting
osed
ting
osed 0
y Miles 1
(miles) 8
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
anyon
s north-south
h the majori
e 133 (Lagun
mately 8.8 m
III bike facilit
OCTA Distr
ons: Irvine, C
o intersects t
and Coast Hig
Toro/Alicia a
Op
Th
sce
bic
Cla
Cla
suc
sid
ma
ex
A
seg
e or walk. A
speed limit o
the Laguna
n Hwy 73 an
d constructio
million.
uld link to st
ystal Cove Sta
les)

0.0 0.0

1.0 6.8

7.8 0.0

15.6 8.8

S STRATEG
ransportation
h near the
ty of the
a Canyon
miles long,
ies.
rict 3, and
County of
the following
ghway 1. The
nd Pacific Co
pportunitie
he majority o
enic and lar
cyclists wantin
ass III bike fa
ass II bike fa
ch as roadw
dewalks, curb
ajor junction
ists adequate
challenge fo
gments with
lso, the majo
of 50 MPH
Canyon Cor
nd Canyon A
on costs for th
tate parks in
ate Park, and

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
g Caltrans fac
e corridor ha
oast Highway
es, Constrai
of the Laguna
rgely uninter
ng to travel lo
cilities along
acility would
way widenin
b, and gutter
points, such
e right-of-way
r the Laguna
h grades gr
ority of the c
may pose ad
rridor is ass
Acres Drive, w
he Laguna Ca
ncluding Bom
the Laguna C
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
cilities: Inters
as direct links
corridors. Fi
ints, and Es
a Canyon Co
rrupted ridin
ong distances
its full length
require ma
ng and cons
r, and signing
h as at State
y to provide b
a Canyon C
reater than
corridor being
dditional aut
ociated with
which requir
anyon corrido
mer and Sha
College of Ar
 Irvine
 Coun
 Lagun
 Bomm
Canyo
 Lagun
Park
 Lagun
Desig
 Down
$8

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
state 405 Fre
s to other reg
gure 3.3 illust
timated Co
orridor provi
ng experienc
s. The corrido
h. To upgrade
ajor improvem
struction of
g and striping
e Route 73,
bike lanes.
orridor are
5%, which
g located on
to-related ris
installing C
res widening
or, including s
ady Canyons
rt and Design.
e
nty of Orange
na Beach
mer and Shady
ons Park
na Coast Wilder
na College of Ar
gn
ntown Laguna B

8.4-$10.3 million
DORS
27 eeway,
gional
trates
osts
ides a
e for
or has
e to a
ments
new
g. At
there
short
h are
State
sks to
lass II
some
street
Park,
.
rness
rt and
each
n

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
IRVINE
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAKE
FOREST
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH

LAGUNA CANYON CAMPUS CULVER

LA PATA

UNIVERSITY

MICHELSON

JUNIPERO SERRA

TURTLE ROCK

SHADY CANYON

BONITA CANYON

WOOD CANYON

ALISO CREEK
ALICIA

DEL RIO

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

ROCKFIELD

RIDGE ROUTE

SANTA MARIA EL TORO SANTA VITTORIA

PACIFIC COAST

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

OSO PASEO DE VALENCIA
CABOT

ALIPAZDEL OBISPOBEACON HILL

MARINA HILLS

CLUB HOUSE

PACIFIC ISLAND
ORTEGA

SUNNYHILL

GLENWOOD

STREET OF THE GOLDEN LANTERN

RIDGELINE

NEWPORT COAST SAN JOAQUIN HILLS SPYGLASS HILL SAN MIGUEL

LAKE FOREST BAKE YALE

BARRANCA

IRVINE CENTER

QUAIL HILL

SAND CANYON
B
R
O
A
D
WAY

PACIFIC PARK

ALISO VIEJO

CAMINO CAPISTRANO LA NOVIA SAN JUAN CREEK

MUIRLANDS LOS ALISOS

STONEHILL

JEFFREY CREEK
NIGUEL
LAKE

RANCHO VIEJO

TRABUCO CREEK

PACIFIC COAST
FOREST

GLENNEYRE

HIGHLANDS
LA PAZ
AVERY

PASEO DE COLINAS CROWN VALLEY

GREENFIELD

MARGUERITE ANTONIO
ALTON
FELIPE

MOULTON

CAMINO DEL AVION

LAGUNA HILLS
73 133
73 5
5 405
B
R
RE Connection to Corridor A
Connection to Corridor
C
C
A
A
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR B: LAGUNA CANYON
Source: OCTA
Figure 3-3

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Corridor BBikeway Corridor Details1 mile of existing Class II7.8 miles of existing Class III Parks within
1/4-mile Served
1 6
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

7.5K
Of Total
Corridor Length

8.8miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$8.4-10.3million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 482
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.3 Co
Overview
The El To
boundary
approxim
Class I, 10
of Class
jurisdictio
Laguna W
the follow
and part o
direct lin
Portola/Sa
Capistran
Corridor
number o
recomme
treatment
traffic. C
on/off-ram
curb ramp
Estimated
intersectio
Major R
The El To
Canyons W
Laguna Be
Leng
Class
Class I
Class I
orridor C:
w
oro/Alicia Co
of District
ately 15.3 mi

0.5 miles of e
III. The c
ons: County
Woods, Aliso V
wing Caltrans
of the corrido
ks to other
anta Margarit
o, PCH, and
C.
of collisions h
nded. The co
ts at these lo
Currently imp
mp including w
ps from the b
d construction
on crossing im
Regional De
oro/Alicia/Lag
Wilderness P
each, and the
gth of Bikeway
I
Ex
Pro
II
Ex
Pro
II
Ex
Pro
Total Bikew
Corridor Len
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
El Toro/Al
rridor runs d
5 to Lagu
les long, com
existing Class
corridor pas
of Orange,
Viejo, and Lag
s facilities: Int
or is State Hi
regional bike
ta, Aliso Cre
d Laguna Ca
have been rec
orridor cross
ocations. The
provements a
widening the
bridge to the
n costs for th
mprovements
stinations
guna Canyon
Park, Lake Mi
adjacent bea
y Facilities (Mi
xisting
oposed
xisting
oposed
xisting
oposed
way Miles
ngth (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
icia/Lagun
iagonally from
na Beach. T
mprised of 0.5
II bike faciliti
sses through
Mission Viej
guna Beach.
terstate 5 and
ighway 133. T
eway corrido
eek, Muirland
anyon. Figur
O
T
C
u
m
c
r
i
e
T
corded along
ses five majo
e segment alo
are planned
sidewalk fro
adjacent Targ
he El Toro/Ali
s, range from
Corridor wo
ssion Viejo, a
ch areas.
iles)

0.5 0.0

10.5 1.4

4.3 0.0

15.8 15.3

S STRATEG
ransportation
a Canyon
m near the no
The corridor
miles of exis
ies, and 4.3 m
h the follow
jo, Laguna H
It also interse
d State Rout
The corridor
ors including
ds/Cabot/Cam
e 3.4 illustra
Opportunit
The majority
Corridor is
uses that cou
majority of th
corridor an e
ridership onc
ntersects or
expanding its
The corridor
g the route. D
r intersection
ong Laguna C
for the nort
m approxima
get driveway.
icia/Laguna C
$12.2 to $15
ould link to s
and the Saddle

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
orth
r is
sting
miles
wing
Hills,
ects
te 7,
has
the
mino
ates
ties, Constra
y of the E
located amo
uld appeal to
he corridor
established ro
ce improvem
overlaps wit
network.
r crosses seve
Due to this,
ns and Inters
Canyon is nar
thbound I-5
ately four feet
Canyon corrid

5.2 million.
state and loc
eback Memo
Jurisdi
Attrac
Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
raints, and E
El Toro/Alici
ng residentia
avid and cas
is already in
oute that wil
ments are mad
th five other
eral major int
enhanced bik
state 5, and w
rrow with re
and eastbou
t to eight fee
dor including f
cal parks inclu
rial Medical C
ictions:
 C
 A





ctions:
 S
 S

S

 S
a

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
Estimated C
ia/Laguna Ca
al and comm
sual bicyclists
place, makin
ll only increa
de. The cor
regional corr
tersections; a
keway feature
will require s
latively high
nd Alicia Par
et and adding
freeway and
uding Aliso W
Center, down
County of Oran
Aliso Viejo
Laguna Beach
Laguna Woods
Laguna Hills
Mission Viejo
Rancho Santa
Margarita
Shopping center
Saddleback Mem
Medical Center
Laguna Hills Hig
School
Lake Mission Vie
State and local p
and beaches
$12.2-15.2 milli
DORS
29 Costs
anyon
mercial
s. The
ng the
ase its
rridor
ridors,
a large
es are
special
speed
rkway
ADA
major
Wood
ntown
nge
rs
morial
gh
ejo
parks
ion

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

ORANGE CO
COUNTY
COUNTY
TUSTIN
TUSTIN
COUNTY
COUNTY
LAKE
FOREST
COUNTY
IRVINE
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
RANCHO
SANTA

MARGARITA
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH
IRVINE

SANTA VITTORIA

QUAIL HILL
FOREST

GLENNEYRE
HOLT

LA PATA

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA

NORTHWOOD
R

JUNIPERO SERRA

SOUTHWOOD
CAMPUS
BIRCH

BROWNING

ALMA ALDEA

AVENIDA DE LAS FLORES

GREENFIELD

WESTWOOD

PRAIRIE

BUFFALO

NEWPORT

AVENIDA LA PATA

CARLSON

COMMERCENTRE

TURTLE ROCK
16TH
TALEGA
RANCHO

ALISO CREEK

WOOD CANYON
WALNUT

PLANO TRABUCO
22ND
LIDO
DODGE

VON KARMAN

SANTA ROSA
L

AVOCADO

TECHNOLOGY

EASTWOOD

VISTA HERMOSA

MICHELSON

LA PROMESA

MELINDA

GLENN RANCH

SANTA MARGARITA
OSO
FELIPE

MARGUERITE

EL CAMINO REAL
ND

PORTOLA
CABOT
ALIPAZ

SAN JUAN CREEK

TUST NI RANCH

VALENCIA

JAMBOREE

OLD IRVINE

SAND CANYON

RED HILL

HARVARD

CITRUSGLEN

AVENIDA EMPRESA

SUNNYHILL

BARRANCA

LA NOVIA

ANTONIO
CULVER
DOVER

UNIVERSITY

PASEO DE COLINAS

CANYONWOOD

SAN JOAQUIN HILLS

DEL OBISPO

RIDGELINE

BONITA CANYON

D CANYON

ALAS DE PAZ
COAST

NEWPORT COAST

BERKELEY

SYCAMORE
SELVA

PACIFIC PARK

ALISO VIEJO

SANTA CRUZ

IRVINE CENTER

CAMINO MIRA COSTA

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS

AVENIDA PICO

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

VERA CRUZ

DOHENY PARK

STONEHILL

CAMINO DEL AVION

GOLDEN LANTERN

AVENIDA VAQUERO

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

RANCHO VIEJO

TRABUCO CREEK

SAN MIGUEL

SHADY CANYON

MACARTHUR
BALBOA
YALE
CREEK
ALTON
MESA
LAKE

JEFFREY

WESTCLIFF

ARBORWOOD

CROWN VALLEY

BEACON HILL

PACIFIC ISLAND
NIGUEL

MARINA HILLS
AVERY

HIGHLANDS

DEL RIO

OLYMPIAD
BAKE
TOLEDO

TRABUCO

MUIRLANDS

ROCKFIELD

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

LAKE FOREST
LA PAZ

NEWPORT CENTER

EL TORO

LOS ALISOS

MEADOWOOD
BISON
ORTEGA

RIDGE ROUTE

JERONIMO

MOULTON

GLENWOOD

SANTA MARIA

LAGUNA CANYON

LAGUNA HILLS

PASEO DE VALENCIA

ARMSTRONG
ALICIA
BRYAN
FORD

EASTBLUFF

BAYSIDE

SPYGLASS HILL
73 73
5 261
133
241
5 5
5 405
t
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR C: EL TORO / ALICIA / LAGUNA CANYON
Figure 3-4
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Connection to Corridor B
B
AS PEO
Con
nection to
Corridor F
LOS A
NIMO
O DE

S ALISO
ERO
Connection to Corridor E
LICIA
Connection to Corridor E
F
E
E
5 F
Connection to Corridor F
ARITA

AVENIDA EM
A

MARGARIT ARGA

SANTA M

D RESA P
D
Connection to Corridor D
RE
Co
nnection
to Corridor A
GE C
O
A
A
Corridor CBikeway Corridor Details0.5 miles of existing Class I10.5 miles of existing Class II4.3 miles of existing Class III Parks within
1/4-mile Served
6 24
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

50.4K
Of Total
Corridor Length

15.3miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$12.2-15.2million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 484
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.4 Co
Overview
The Porto
the nort
approxim
Class II bi
paths.

The corri
3, Lake
Margarita
corridors
Figure 3.5
and Class
traffic. T
may deter
Estimated
crossing i
Major R
The Porto
Creek Tr
Leng
Class I
Class II
Class III
orridor D:
w
ola/Santa Mar
h boundary
ately 6.7 mil
ike lanes and
idor directly
Forest, Mis
, and interse
including the
5 illustrates C
s II bike lanes
The corridor
r some riders
d constructio
mprovement
Regional De
ola/Santa Ma
ail, Trabuco H
gth of Bikeway
Exist
Propo
Exist
Propo
I
Exist
Propo
Total Bikewa
Corridor Lengt
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Portola/Sa
rgarita Corrid
of District
es long, with

0.6 miles of
connects to
ssion Viejo,
ects State Ro
e Aliso Creek
Corridor D.
s, thus many
also crosses
s and require
on costs for
s, range from
stinations
rgarita Corri
Hills High Sch
y Facilities (Mi
ting
osed
ting
osed
ting
osed
ay Miles
th (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
anta Marga
dor runs diag

5. The co
h 6.5 miles o
proposed Cl
Supervisoria
and Ranch
oute 241. Th
k, El Toro/Al
O
C
a
a
c
a
c
p
c
o
A
bicyclists may
the State Ro
special impro
the Portola/
m $6.5 to $8.0
dor would li
hool, and Tije
iles)

0.0 0.6

6.5 0.0

0.0 0.0

7.1 6.7

S STRATEG
ransportation
arita
gonal near
orridor is
of existing
lass I bike
al District
ho Santa
he corridor h
icia/Laguna C
Opportunit
Corridor D
areas in the n
appealing asp
commuter an
already exist
connections
proposed bik
cyclists. The
other regiona
A majority of
y not feel co
oute 241 free
ovements.
/Santa Marga
0 million.
nk to state a
eras Creek Ele

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
has direct lin
Canyon, and A
ties, Constra
covers majo
northern por
pect of this
nd recreation
t along a m
to eleven i
keway facilities
e corridor int
al corridors, e
f the street s
omfortable or
eway with Cl
arita corrido
and local par
ementary Sch
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
nks to other
Antonio/La Pa
raints, and E
or residentia
rtions of Dist
s corridor a
nal riders. C
majority of t
ntersections
s, providing m
tersects or o
expanding its
segments have
r safe riding n
lass II bike la
r including m
rks, Aliso Cr
hool.
 Lake
 Missio
 Ranch
 Shopp
 Emplo
 Eleme
Schoo
 State
$

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
r regional bik
ata/Pico corr
Estimated C
al and comm
trict 5. This
and could a
Class II bike
the corridor
with existin
many links for
verlaps with
network.
e high speed
next to high
anes provided
major interse
reek Trail, Se
Forest
on Viejo
ho Santa Margar
ping centers
oyment centers
entary and High
ols
and local parks

6.5-$8.0 million
DORS
31 keway
ridors.

Costs
mercial
s is an
attract
lanes
with
ng or
r local
three
limits
speed
d; this
ection
errano
rita

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

ORANGE CO
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
IRVINE

MISSION
VIEJO
RANCHO
SANTA

MARGARITA
LAKE
FOREST

EL TORO
ALTON
BAKE

LAKE FOREST

COMMERCENTRE
RANCHO

PLANO TRABUCO

PORTOLA

AVENIDA EMPRESA

LA PROMESA

ALMA ALDEA
ANTONI
O
ANTON

IO AVENIDA DE LAS FLORES

MELINDA

MARUERITE

GLENN RANCH

SANTA MARGARITA
IRVINE

TRABUCO

LOS ALISOS
ALICIA

AVENIDA DE LAS BANDERAS

JERONIMO
241
241
241
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR D: PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA
Figure 3-5
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Connection to Corridor H
H
H

EL TORO
Connection to Corridor E
E
E
Connection to Corri
dor
C
C
Parks within
1/4-mile Served
4 7
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

26.7K
Of Total
Corridor Length

6.7miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$6.5-8.0million
Corridor DBikeway Corridor Details6.5 miles of existing Class II

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 486
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.5 Co
Overview
The Aliso
north bou
The corri
miles of
existing C
The corri
and runs
Orange,
Laguna H
Beach. It
State Rou
The corri
corridors
Muirlands
Parkway,
illustrates
As outline
with a Cla
of Aliso C
small hote
both the g
Estimated
construct
Major Re
The Aliso
Complex,
Len
Class I
Class I
Class II
orridor E: A
w
o Creek Cor
undary of Di
idor is approx
existing Clas
Class II bike la
dor directly c
within the
Lake Forest
Hills, Aliso V
t also intersec
ute 133 and 2
idor has dire
including
s/Cabot/Cami
and Pacific C
s Corridor E.
ed in the Stra
ass 1 connect
Creek Canyo
el. Due to th
golf course an
d constructio
tion of propos
egional Dest
o Creek Cor
, Aliso Viejo M
ngth of Bikewa
I
Exist
Propo
I
Exist
Propo
II
Exist
Propo
Total Bikewa
Corridor Lengt
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Aliso Cree
rridor runs n
istrict 5 to P
ximately 20.3
ss I bike pa
anes.
connects to S
following jur
t, Mission V
Viejo, Laguna
cts the follow
241, Interstate
ect links to o
the Port
ino Capistran
Coast Highway
ategy, the co
tion to Aliso
n is privately
he narrownes
nd the bike co
n costs for
sed Class I fa
tinations
ridor links to
Middle Schoo
ay Facilities (M
ting
osed
ting
osed
ting
osed
ay Miles
th (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
k Corridor
north-south
Pacific Coast
3 miles long,
aths and 2.0
Supervisorial
risdictions: C
Viejo, Laguna
a Niguel, an
wing Caltrans
e 5, and State
other regiona
tola/Santa M
no, El Toro/A
y corridors. F
O
C
a
T
p
a
e
t
b
c
o
c
2 a
orridor conne
Beach Count
owned by va
ss of the cany
orridor has n
the Aliso Cr
cilities, range
o state and lo
ol, Aliso Nigue
Miles)

13.5 6.3

2.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

21.8 20.3

S STRATEG
ransportation
r
from the
Highway.
with 13.5
miles of
District 3
County of
Woods,
d Laguna
s facilities:
e Route I.
l bikeway
Margarita,
Alicia, Oso
Figure 3.6
Opportunitie
Corridor E
areas with ac
This corridor
paths, which
attracts nume
exist along a
to several i
bikeway facil
cyclists. The
other region
choice of rou
241 and 73 fr
all providing C
ects through
ty Park. How
arious landow
yon and prope
not been reso
reek corrido
from $8.2 to
ocal parks, L
el High Schoo

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
es, Constrain
covers majo
ccess to scho
r is largely co
is an appeali
erous users
majority of
intersections
lities, provid
e corridor in
nal corridors
utes. The cor
reeways, along
Class I facilitie
Aliso and W
wever, at the
wners and ho
erty easemen
olved.
or including g
o $10.0 millio
Laguna Hills C
ol, and Wood
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
nts, and Esti
or residentia
ools and loca
omprised of ex
ing aspect of
every day.
the corridor
with exist
ding addition
ntersects or
s, expanding
rridor also cr
g with the Int
es traveling u
Wood Canyon
present time
osts a nine-ho
nt issue, a way
grading/retain
on.

Community C
d Canyon Elem
 Coun
 Lake
 Missio
 Lagun
 Lagun
 Aliso
 Lagun
 Lagun
 Shopp
 Emplo
 Eleme
Schoo
 State
 Beach
$8

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
imated Costs
l and comm
al and state
xisting Class
f the corrido
Class I bike
r with connec
ting or prop
al links for
overlaps wit
its network
rosses State R
terstate 5 fre
under the free
s Wilderness
the lower po
ole golf cours
y to accomm
ning walls an
Center and S
mentary Scho
nty of Orange
Forest
on Viejo
na Woods
na Hills
Viejo
na Niguel
na Beach
ping centers
oyment centers
entary and High
ols
and local parks
h

8.2-$10.0million
DORS
33 s
mercial
parks.

I bike
or and
paths
ctions
posed
local
h five
k and
Route
eeway,
eway.
s Park
ortion
se and
odate
d the
Sports
ool.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

ORANGE CO
COUNTY
COUNTY
COSTA
MESA
SANTA
ANA
TUSTIN
TUSTIN
VILLA
PARK
ORANGE
COUNTY
COUNTY
LAKE
FOREST
COUNTY
IRVINE

HUNTINGTON
BEACH
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
RANCHO
SANTA

MARGARITA
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH

CHAPMAN
IRVINE

SANTA VITTORIA

QUAIL HILL

SUPER OI R
4TH

EDINGER
FOREST

GLENNEYRE
HOLT

LA PATA
MAIN
15TH

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA

NORTHWOOD

DEL MAR

JUNIPERO SERRA

SOUTHWOOD
WILSON

ESPLANADE
CAMPUS
BIRCH

BROWNING
BOND

PACIFIC COAST

ALMA ALDEA

AVENIDA DE LAS FLORES

GREENFIELD

BRISTOL

WESTWOOD

PRAIRIE

COLLINS

BUFFALO

NEWPORT

AVENIDA LA PATA

SOUTH COAST

CARLSON

COMMERCENTRE

TURTLE ROCK
16TH
TALEGA

SUNFLOWER
RANCHO
GRAND

ALISO CREEK

WOOD CANYON
17TH
WALNUT
DYER

SANTA CLARA

PLANO TRABUCO
22ND

VIA LIDO
1ST

CHESTNUT
DODGE

VON KARMAN

SANTA ROSA

FOOTHILL
TUSTIN

AVOCADO

SANTIAGO CANYON

TECHNOLOGY

EASTWOOD

VISTA HERMOSA

MICHELSON

LA PROMESA

MELINDA

GLENN RANCH

SANTA MARGARITA
OSO
FELIPE

MARGUERITE

SANTA ANA

ARLINGTON

EL CAMINO REAL
32ND

CANYON VIEW
BAKER

HOSPITAL

PORTOLA
CABOT

MESA VERDE
ALIPAZ

SAN JUAN CREEK

TUST NI RANCH

VALENCIA

SANTIAGO

JAMBOREE
FAIR

OLD IRVINE

SAND CANYON

RED HILL

HARVARD

CITRUSGLEN

FAIRHAVEN

AVENIDA EMPRESA

SUNNYHILL
MABURY

BARRANCA
HARBOR

LA NOVIA

ANTONIO
CULVER
DOVER

UNIVERSITY

PASEO DE COLINAS

PAULARINO

CANYONWOOD

SAN JOAQUIN HILLS

DEL OBISPO

RIDGELINE

STANDARD

BONITA CANYON
SPRING

CRAWFORD CANYON

ALAS DE PAZ
COAST

NEWPORT COAST
RAITT

BERKELEY

SYCAMORE
19TH
SELVA

PACIFIC PARK

ALISO VIEJO

PLACENTIA

SANTA CRUZ

IRVINE CENTER
BEAR

CAMINO MIRA COSTA

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS

AVENIDA PICO

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

VERA CRUZ

DOHENY PARK

STONEHILL

CAMINO DEL AVION

GOLDEN LANTERN

AVENIDA VAQUERO

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

PROSPECT

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

RANCHO VIEJO

TRABUCO CREEK

SAN MIGUEL

SHADY CANYON

MACARTHUR

SAKIOKA

VICTORIA

FAIRVIEW
BALBOA
YALE
CREEK
HEWES
ALTON

CABRILLO PARK
MESA
LAKE
CANNON

JEFFREY

WESTCLIFF

ARBORWOOD
ADAMS

CROWN VALLEY

MCFADDEN

BEACON HILL

PACIFIC ISLAND
NIGUEL

MARINA HILLS
AVERY

HIGHLANDS

DEL RIO

OLYMPIAD
BAKE
TOLEDO

TRABUCO

MUIRLANDS

ROCKFIELD

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

LAKE FOREST
LA PAZ

NEWPORT CENTER

EL TORO

LOS ALISOS

MEADOWOOD
BISON
ORTEGA
WARNER
FLOWER
YORBA

HALLADAY

RIDGE ROUTE

LA VETA
ANTON

SEGERSTROM

BROADWAY

JERONIMO

MOULTON

GLENWOOD

SANTA MARIA

LAGUNA CANYON

LAGUNA HILLS

PASEO DE VALENCIA

ARMSTRONG
ALICIA
BRYAN

MERRIMAC
FORD

EASTBLUFF

BAYSIDE

SPYGLASS HILL
73 73
55 261
133
241
241
5 5
5 405
t
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR E: ALISO CREEK
Figure 3-6
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
LAG
Connection to Corridor G
G
ASEO
Connection toCorridor C
C
C Connect on i to Corridor C
C
Connection to Corridor F
DS
F
C
5 ALIC
CABO
F T
Connection to Corridor F
SANTA
HO
D

ARGARITA A ARITA ARGA M TA
D
Connection to Corridor D
Connection to Corridor A
A

NNEYRE ENNEYRE ENN
A
Corridor EBikeway Corridor Details13.5 miles of existing Class I2 miles of existing Class II Parks within
1/4-mile Served
12 35
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

57.2K
Of Total
Corridor Length

20.2miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$8.2-10.0million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 488
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.6 Co
Overview
The Mu
diagonally
District 5
The corri
of existin
lanes, and
connects
Coast Hig
multiple lo
bikeway c
Parkway,
Figure 3.7
corridors
the entire
Paz Road
Viejo Met
At La Paz
5) are sep
the I-5 un
an alterna
Aliso Cre
Cabot Ro
the feasib
freeway o
Muirlands
reviewed
Muirlands
Class I bik
Major Re
The Muir
Los Alisos
Sports Co
Capistran
Length
Class I
Class II
Class II
orridor F: M
w
uirlands/Cabo
y north – so
5 adjacent to
idor is appro
g Class I bik
d 2.6 miles of
to Superviso
ghway on the
ocations. The
corridors inc
San Juan Cr
7 illustrates C
, expanding it
e corridor. T
, (2) using th
trolink station
z Road, Muirla
parated by on
ndercrossing o
ate route has
eek Bikeway
oad. This mo
bility phase o
on/off ramps
s Boulevard a
during t
s/Cabot/Cami
ke path facilit
egional Dest
rlands/Cabot/C
s Intermediat
omplex, Vale
o Metrolink S
h of Bikeway F
Exist
Propo
I Exist
Propo
I Exist
Propo
Total Bikewa
Corridor Lengt
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Muirlands/C
ot/Camino
outh starting
Irvine and so
ximately 17.9
ke paths, 6.5
f proposed C
orial District
e south end,
e corridor ha
luding the Al
reek, and Pac
Corridor F.
ts network. T
There are ma
he LOSSAN r
n, and (3) con
ands Bouleva
nly a few hun
of La Paz Roa
s been propo
to cross und
ore circuitous
other alternat
and (2) add
nd Cabot Ro
the feasibili
ino Capistran
ies, and impro
tinations
Camino Capi
te School, Ra
ncia Element
Station, San Ju
Facilities (Mile
ting 4
osed 2
ting 6
osed 1
ting 1
osed 2
ay Miles 18
th (miles) 17
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Cabot/Cam
Capistrano
at the nort
outh to Pacif
9 miles long,
miles of exi
Class I bike pa
3 on the no
and crosses t
as direct links
liso Creek, E
cific Coast H
Oppo
Corri
conne
comm
Metro
A larg
Class
the c
inters
The c
The corridor
ny significant
railroad right
nnection from
rd (on the no
ndred yards.
ad, which has
osed that wo
der the I-5, w
route adds a
tives will be
ing a Class
ad at La Paz
ity study
no corridor, i
ovements to
istrano corrid
lph A. Gates
tary School, L
uan Hills Golf
es)
.4
.6
.5
.5
.6
.0

8.6 7.9

S STRATEG
ransportation
mino Capis
Corridor
thern bounda
fic Coast Hig
including 4.4
isting Class I
aths. The cor
orth end, to P
the I-5 Freew
s to other re
El Toro/Alicia
Highway corr
ortunities, C
idor F covers
ections to
mercial areas
olink rail corr
ge portion o
I bike paths
corridor. It
sections with
corridor inte
crosses the I
t constraints
t-of-way along
m San Juan Cr
orth side of I
However, t
very high tra
ould go south
with a conne
about 1.5 mil
examined in
1 facility adja
Road. Rightphase. Est
ncluding majo
Class II bikew
dor would lin
Elementary S
Laguna Nigue
f Club, and Pa

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
strano
runs
ary of
ghway.
miles
I bike
rridor
Pacific
way at
egional
a, Oso
ridors.

Constraints, a
s a major por
some of t
in south Or
ridor with ac
f the corrido
and Class II b
provides m
h existing o
ersects or ov
Interstate 5 fr
for this corr
g Camino Ca
reek to the C
-5) and Cabo
the connectio
affic volumes.
h on Los Ali
ection to Pas
es and severa
ncluding (1) i
acent to the
-of-way issues
timated co
or intersectio
ways, range fr
nk state and
School, Lagun
el/Mission Vie
alisades Elem
Juris
Attr
Cos

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
and Estimate
rtion of Distr
the densest
range County
ccess to two M
or is already
bike lanes alo
many connec
r proposed
verlaps with f
reeway at thr
ridor: (1) cro
apistrano, sou
Coast Highway
ot Road (on t
on currently r
To avoid th
sos Boulevar
seo De Valen
al hills to the
improvement
railroad righ
s on Camino
onstruction
on crossing im
rom $7.4 to $
local parks,
na Hills Comm
ejo Metrolink
mentary Schoo
sdictions:







ractions:




st: $7

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
ed Costs
rict 5 and pro
t residential
y. It paralle
Metrolink sta
in place, pro
ong the major
ctions to se
bikeway fac
five other reg
ree locations
ossing the I-5
uth of the M
y, and others
the south side
requires navi
his difficult cro
rd, connect t
ncia, then ba
e corridor. D
ts to LaPaz a
ht-of-way bet
Capistrano w
costs for
mprovements
$9.0 million.

Aliso Creek
munity Cente
k Station, San
ol.

Lake Forest
Mission Viejo
Laguna Woods
Laguna Hills
Laguna Niguel
San Juan Capist
Dana Point
Shopping cente
Employment ce
Elementary and
Schools
State and local

7.4-$9.0 million
DORS
35 ovides
and
ls the
ations.
viding
rity of
everal
cilities.
gional
along
at La
Mission
.
e of Igating
ossing
to the
ack to
During
at the
tween
will be
the
s, new
Trail,
er and
n Juan
s
trano
ers
enters
d High
parks

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and COUNTY
COUNTY
LAKE
FOREST
COUNTY

IRVINE LAGUNA WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH

SANTA VITTORIA

QUAIL HILL

IRVINE CENTER
FOREST

LA PATA

ROCKFIELD

LOS ALISOS

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA

AVENIDA VAQUERO

DOHENY PARK

UNIVERSITY

EL CAMINO REAL

GREENFIELD

PACIFIC ISLAND

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

AVENIDA LA PATA

MICHELSON

TURTLE ROCK
TALEGA

PACIFIC COAST

GLENNEYRE

WOOD CANYON

ALISO CREEK

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA BAKE

VISTA HERMOSA

ALISO VIEJO
OSO

VERA CRUZ
CABOT

SAN JUAN CREEK
ALIPAZ

MUIRLANDS

SAND CANYON

SUNNYHILL
COAST

LA NOVIA

ANTONIO

GLENWOOD

RIDGE ROUTE

PASEO DE COLINAS

DEL OBISPO

BARRANCA

STREET OF THE GOLDEN LANTERN

RIDGELINE

AVENIDA P CI O

LAGUNA CANYON

NEWPORT COAST
YALE

CLUBHOUSE

PASEO DE VALENCIA
SELVA

BROADWAY

PACIFIC PARK

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS

CAMINO MIRA COSTA

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

SAN JOAQUIN HILLS

SHADY CANYON

BEACON HILL

TRABUCO CREEK
NIGUEL

MARGUERITE

JEFFREY

SANTA MARIA

RANCHO VIEJO

CAMINO DE LOS MARES CAMINO VERA CRUZ CROWN VALLEY

STONEHILL

MARINA HILLS

HIGHLANDS
FELIPE

DEL RIO
LA P
E
AZ
L TORO
ALTON

JERONIMO
AVERY

LAKE FOREST

MOULTON
ALICIA

SPYGLASS HILL

CAMINO DEL AVION

LAGUNA HILLS
CULVER
ORTEGA
73 73
261
5 5
5 405
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR F: MUIRLANDS / CABOT / CAMINO CAPISTRANO
Figure 3-7
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Connection
to Corridor G
G
G
Connection to Corridor C
C
Connection to Corridor C
C
ALICIA
Connection to Corridor E
LO To Corr di or E
E
LISOS
E
Connection to Corridor I I
I
C
K
AM
A
I
RK
Connection to Corridor A
A
A
Corridor FBikeway Corridor Details4.4 miles of existing Class I6.5 miles of existing Class II1.6 miles of existing Class III Parks within
1/4-mile Served
19 27
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

62.6K
Of Total
Corridor Length

17.9miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$7.4-9.0million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 490
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.7 Co
Overview
The Oso
Aliso Cre
Drive. T
with 1.7 m
of existin
connects
Mission
Orange, a
5 freeway
Muirlands
or willing
freeways
riders and
Estimated
separated
Major R
The Oso
Serrano C
Len
Class
Class I
Class I
orridor G:
w
Parkway Co
eek Road to
The corridor
miles of exist
ng Class II b
to Aliso Vi
Viejo, Ranch
and intersects
y. The corrido
s/Cabot, and A
to ride along
along with t
d special impr
d constructio
d bikeway faci
Regional De
Parkway corr
Creek Trail, L
ngth of Bikewa
I
Exis
Prop
II
Exis
Prop
II
Exis
Prop
Total Bikew
Corridor Leng
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Oso Parkw
rridor runs e
South Bend
r is approxim
ing Class I bi
bike lanes. T
iejo, Laguna
ho Santa M
s State Route
or has direct
Antonio/La P
g portions of
the Interstate
rovements ar
n costs for t
lities, range f
stinations
ridor connect
Las Flores Mid
ay Facilities (M
sting
posed
sting
posed
sting
posed
way Miles
gth (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
way
east-west fro
Road/Coto
mately 8.9 m
ke paths and
The corridor
Niguel, Lagu
Margarita, Co
e 73 and the
t links to othe
ata/Pico corr
this corridor
e 5 freeway w
e needed.
the Oso Park
rom $5.5 to $
ts state and l
ddle School, T
Miles)

1.7 0.0

8.8 0.0

0.0 0.0

10.5 8.9

S STRATEG
ransportation
m east of
De Caza
miles long,

8.8 miles
r directly
una Hills,
ounty of
Interstate
er regional b
ridors. Figure
Opportuni
Costs
Corridor G
portion of D
place provid
the corridor
intersections
facilities, pro
corridor in
regional cor
corridor ha
greater than
r. The corrid
with Class II
kway corrido
$6.8 million.
ocal parks, A
Tesoro High

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
ikeway corrid

3.8 illustrate
ities, Constr
covers major
District 5. Th
ding Class II
r with conne
s with exis
oviding many
tersects or
rridors, expan
as some segm
5%, some cy
dor also cross
bike lanes p
or including u
Aliso Creek T
School, and W
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
dors includin
s Corridor G
raints, and
r residential a
he entire cor
bike lanes al
ections to ap
sting or p
y links for lo
overlaps w
nding its netw
ments with
yclists may no
ses the State
provided; this
upgrading Cla
rail, Mission V
Wagon Whee
 Aliso
 Lagun
 Lagun
 Missio
 Ranch
 Coun
 Shopp
 Middl
 State
$

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
g the Aliso C
G.

Estimated
areas in the c
rridor is alrea
long a major
proximately
roposed bik
ocal cyclists.
with three
work. Becaus
an average
ot feel comfo
Route 73 an
s may deter
ass II bike lan
Viejo Golf Co
el Sports Park
Viejo
na Niguel
na Hills
on Viejo
ho Santa Margar
nty of Orange
ping centers
e and High Scho
and local parks

5.5-$6.8 million
DORS
37 Creek,
entral
ady in
rity of
seven
keway
The
other
se the
slope
rtable
d 241
some
nes to
ourse,
k.
rita
ools

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and COUNTY
COUNTY
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS
LAKE
FOREST
IRVINE

MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
RANCHO
SANTA

MARGARITA
LAGUNA
BEACH

RANCHO VIEJO

LAGUNA CANYON

SANTA MARIA

EL TORO SANTA VITTORIA

ROCKFIELD
LOS A
LISOS

RIDGE ROUTE
TOLEDO

IRVINE CENTER

GREENFIELD

LA PATA

TRABUCO CREEK SAN JUAN CREEK

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA
OSO
ALTON

CABOT CROWN VALLEY

ANTONIO
IRVINE

MUIRLANDS
ORTEGA

GLENWOOD

ALISO CREEK

PASEO DE VALENCIA

PACIFIC PARK ALISO VIEJO CAMINO CAPISTRANO
LA
PAZ

TRABUCO
AVERY

PASEO DE COLINAS

LAKE FOREST
FELIPE

MARGUERITE

OLYMPIAD

BARRANCA BAKE JERONIMO

MOULTON

LAGUNA HILLS
ALICIA
73 73
241
5 5
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR G: OSO PARKWAY
Figure 3-8
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Con
n
ection to
Corridor E
C
Connection to Corridor F
Conn
e
ction
to
Corridor H
H
H
F
F
E
E
Corridor GBikeway Corridor Details1.7 miles of existing Class I8.8 miles of existing Class II Parks within
1/4-mile Served
5 8
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

22.4K
Of Total
Corridor Length

8.9miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$5.5-6.8million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 492
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.8 Co
Overview
The Anto
near the
Highway.
with 13 m
existing
connects
San Juan
State Rou
Portola/Sa
illustrates
network.
utilize the
The corr
segment o
crosses t
Corridor
Estimated
improvem
$11.1 to $
Major R
The Anto
Elementar
Tijeras Cr
Hills High
Metrolink
Leng
Class
Class I
Class I
orridor H:
w
onio/La Pata/P
north bound
The corrido
miles of existi
Class I bik
to Rancho S
Capistrano,
ute 241. The
anta Margarit
s Corridor H.

Avenida Pic
e flood channe
idor is relati
of the corrido
the State Ro
H is the high
d construction
ments, improv
$13.5 million.

Regional De
onio/La Pata/
ry School, Sa
reek Element
h School, Vis
k Station.
gth of Bikeway
I Exis
Prop
II Exis
Prop
II Exis
Prop
Total Bikew
Corridor Leng
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Antonio/La
Pico Corrido
dary of Distr
or is approxi
ng Class II bi
ke paths. T
anta Margarit
and San Cle
e corridor h
ta, Oso Parkw
.
co has limite
el parallel to
vely flat with
or is missing
ute 241 free
h speed and h
n costs for th
ving the exist
.
stinations
/Pico corrido
nta Margarita
tary School, L
sta Hermosa
y Facilities (Mil
sting
posed
sting
posed
sting
posed
way Miles
gth (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
a Pata/Pico
r runs diagon
rict 5 to Paci
mately 18 m
ike lanes and
he corridor
ta, County o
mente, and i
has direct lin
way, San Juan
Op
Co
in
the
wit
ex
lin
ov
d curb to cu
Avenida Pico
h only two s
and needs inf
eway with C
igh volume ar
he Antonio/La
ting Class II
or provides
a Catholic Hi
Las Flores Mi
a Sports Park
les)

1.0 0.2

13.0 3.5

0.5 0.0

18.2 18.0

S STRATEG
ransportation
o
nally from
ific Coast
miles long,
1 mile of
r directly
f Orange,
intersects
nks to other
n Creek, and
pportunitie
orridor H cov
the eastern
e corridor is
th connectio
isting or pro
ks for local
erlaps with th
urb width wit
o to create a C
segments hav
frastructure t
Class II bike
rterial roadw
a Pata/Pico co
bike lanes, a
connection
gh School, R
ddle School,
k, San Clem

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
r regional bik
Pacific Coast
es, Constrai
vers major re
portions of D
already in pla
ns to approx
oposed bike
bicyclists. T
hree other re
th high traffic
Class I bike la
ving an avera
to complete t
lanes provid
way.
orridor includ
and the new
to state an
Rancho Santa
Rancho Miss
mente High S
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
keway corrid
t Highway co
ints, and Est
esidential and
District 5. A
ace providing
ximately ten
way facilities
The corridor
egional corrid
c demand. A
ane has been
age slope of
the corridor.
ded. The ot
ding major int
Class I bike
d local park
Margarita Int
sion Viejo Ho
School, and t
 Ranch
 Coun
 San Ju
 San C
 Shopp
 Emplo
 Eleme
High
 State
$1

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
dors includin
orridors. Figur
timated Co
d commercial
A major porti
g Class II bike
intersections
s, providing
also intersec
dors, expand
An opportun
explored.
5% or highe
The corrido
ther challeng
tersection cro
paths, range
ks, Trabuco
termediate Sc
orse Park, San
the San Clem
ho Santa Margar
nty of Orange
uan Capistrano
Clemente
ping centers
oyment centers
entary, Middle an
Schools
and local parks

1.1-$13.5 million
DORS
39 ng the
re 3.9
osts
areas
ion of
e lanes
s with
many
cts or
ing its
nity to
er. A
or also
ge for
ossing
from
Mesa
chool,
n Juan
mente
rita
nd
n

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

COUNTY COUNTY
TUSTIN
LAKE
FOREST
COUNTY
IRVINE
LAGUNA
WOODS
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
RANCHO
SANTA

MARGARITA
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH

NEWPORT
BEACH
IRVINE

SANTA VITTORIA
BRYAN

QUAIL HILL

GLENN RANCH
FOREST
WALNUT

EL CAMINO REAL

LA PATA
WARNER

ROCKFIELD

LOS ALISOS

AVENIDA VAQUERO

DOHENY PARK

ALMAALDEA

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

PACIFIC ISLAND

WESTWOOD

AVENIDA LA PATA
COAST

CARLSON

TURTLE ROCK

MICHELSON
TALEGA
RANCHO

GLENNEYRE

WOOD CANYON

ALISO CREEK

PLANO TRABUCO

TUSTIN RANCH
MAIN

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

AVOCADO

TECHNOLOGY

EASTWOOD

VISTA HERMOSA

ALISO VIEJO
OSO
ALTON

BARRANCA

PORTOLA
CABOT

SAN JUAN CREEK
ALIPAZ

MUIRLANDS SAND CANYON

HARVARD

AVENIDA EMPRESA

LA NOVIA
ORTEGA

ANTONIO

GLENWOOD
CULVER

JAMBOREE

PASEO DE COLINAS

UNIVERSITY

PACIFIC COAST

SAN JOAQUIN HILLS

DEL OBISPO

RIDGELINE

AVENIDA PICO

BONITA CANYON
CAMPUS

LAGUNA CANYON

NEWPORT COAST
TOLEDO

CLUB HOUSE
BALBOA

BERKELEY

PASEO DE VALENCIA
SELVA

DEL PRADO

SANTA MARGARITA

PACIFIC PARK

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS

IRVINE CENTER

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

SAN MIGUEL

MARGUERITE

SHADY CANYON

BEACONHILL

MACARTHUR
YALE

TRABUCO CREEK

EDINGER
CREEK

NIGUEL LAKE

JEFFREY

SANTA MARIA

RANCHO VIEJO

ARBORWOOD

CAMINO VERA CRUZ

CROWN VALLEY

STONEHILL

MARINA HILLS

HIGHLANDS

OLYMPIAD

DEL RIO
BAKE
LA PAZ

EL TORO

AVEN DI A DE LAS FLORES

TRABUCO

MEADOWOOD
BISON

MELINDA

RIDGE ROUTE
AVERY

LAKE FOREST
FELIPE

JERONIMO

MOULTON
ALICIA

CAMINO DELAVION

BAYSIDE

LAGUNA HILLS
FORD

EASTBLUFF

SPYGLASSH LI L
73 133
241
261
241
73 5
5 5
405
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR H: ANTONIO / LA PATA / PICO
Figure 3-9
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
EL
Connection to Corridor A
OSO
Connection to Corridor G
G
G

EMPRESA
ARITA
DA
ANT
Connection to Corridor D

A MA SAN
D

JUAN CREEK SAN JU
Connection to Corridor I
I
LA
A
A
Corridor HBikeway Corridor Details1 mile of existing Class I13 miles of existing Class II0.5 miles of existing Class III Parks within
1/4-mile Served
12 15
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

40.8K
Of Total
Corridor Length
18miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$11.1-13.5million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 494
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.1.9 Co
Overview
The San
Antonio
Doheny
approxim
existing C
Class I bik
of Orang
intersects
corridors
Figure 3.1
the corrid
access to
corridors
crossings
corridor.
the south
Capistran
Estimated
improvem
Trabuco C
million.

Major R
The San J
Margaret’
Point.

Len
Class I
Class II
Class II
orridor I: S
w
Juan Creek
Parkway just
State beach
ately 8.6 mile
Class I bike
ke paths. The
ge, San Jua
s the Interst
including th
0 illustrates C
dor with con
local and re
, expanding
or travel alo
The corrido
h/east bank o
o.
d constructio
ments, new C
Creek meet,
Regional De
Juan Creek C
s Episcopal S
gth of Bikewa
Exist
Propo
I Exist
Propo
I Exist
Propo
Total Bikewa
Corridor Lengt
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
San Juan Cr
k Corridor
t north of Sa
in Dana Po
es long, com
paths and 2
e corridor co
n Capistran
ate 5 freewa
he Antonio/La
Corridor I.
nnections to
egional bicycl
its network.
ngside vehicle
or also crosse
of the trail a
n costs for
Class I bike pa
providing acc
stinations
Corridor wo
School, City
ay Facilities (M
ting
osed
ting
osed
ting
osed
ay Miles
th (miles)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
reek
runs diagona
an Juan Capis
oint. The co
mprised of 5.8

2.8 miles of
onnects to th
o, Dana Po
ay. The corr
a Pata/Pico,
O
C
c
p
b
a
u
i
four streets
ists. The co
Because the
es, many bicy
es under the
nd connect t
the San Juan
aths, and a n
cess to the e
ould provide
of San Juan C
Miles)

5.8 2.8

0.0 0.0

8.6 8.6

S STRATEG
ransportation
ally from
strano to
orridor is
8 miles of
proposed
e County
oint, and
ridor also ha
Muirlands/Ca
Opportunit
Corridor I
commercial,
portions of D
bike paths alo
appealing asp
users every d
n place, prov
with existin
orridor inters
e corridor is
yclists will fee
Interstate 5
to the new
n Creek corr
ew pedestria
east side of th
connections
Capistrano C

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
as direct lin
abot, and Pac
ties, Constra
provides
and recreat
District 5. Th
ong the major
ect of this co
day. The maj
viding Class I
g or propos
sects or over
completely
el more comfo
Freeway. T
development
ridor includin
an/bicycle brid
he San Juan C
and access
City Hall, and
Jurisdictions:

Attractions:

Cost:

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
ks to other
cific Coast H
aints, and E
connections
tional areas
his corridor
rity of the co
orridor and
jority of the c
I bike lanes a
ed bikeway f
rlaps with thr
off-street wi
fortable or sa
There is an op
t area of the
ng major int
dge where Sa
Creek, range
to state and
d Doheny Sta
 Lake
 Missio
 Ranch
 Shopp
 Emplo
 Eleme
Schoo
 State
$

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
regional bik
Highway corr
Estimated C
to reside
in the sou
consists of C
orridor, which
attracts num
corridor is al
along a major
facilities, pro
ree other reg
thout interse
afe riding alon
pportunity to
e City of San
ersection cro
an Juan Cree
from $3.8 to
local parks,
ate Beach in
Forest
on Viejo
ho Santa Margar
ping centers
oyment centers
entary and High
ols
and local parks

3.8-$4.6 million
DORS
41 keway
ridors.

Costs
ential,
uthern
Class I
h is an
erous
lready
rity of
viding
gional
ection
ng this
o pave
n Juan
ossing
ek and
o $4.6
Saint
Dana
rita

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and COUNTY
COUNTY
ALISO
VIEJO
LAGUNA
HILLS

MISSION
VIEJO
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
DANA
POINT

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
SAN

CLEMENTE
LAGUNA
BEACH

CAMINO DE E
STRE
LLA

AVENIDA VAQUER
O

DOHENY PARK

CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS
LA PAZ

JUNIPERO SERRARANCHO VIEJO
ORTEGA

LA PATA

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

GREENFIELD

WOOD CANYON

ANTONIO

PACIFIC COAST

PACIFIC ISLAND

CAMINO DEL AVION

CLUB HOUSE

CROWN VALLEY

STREET OF THE GOLDEN LANTERN

ALISO CREEK ALISO VIEJO

SAN JUAN CREEK

LA NOVIA
ALI
PAZ

PACIFIC PARK
COAST

PASEO DE COLINAS

DEL OBISPO

EL CAMINO REAL

AVENIDA LA PATA

AVENIDA PICO VISTA HERMOSA

VISTA HERMOSA

VERA CRUZ

CAMINO DE LOS MARES DEL RIO
TALEGA

DANA POINT HARBOR
ALICIA
SELVA

CAMINO MIRA COSTA

BEACON HILL

TRABUCO CREEK
NIGUEL

MARGUERITE

STONEHILL

MARINA HILLS

HIGHLANDS

MOULTON
OSO

CABOT AVERY

DEL PRADO
5 73
5 OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative
CORRIDOR I: SAN JUAN CREEK
Figure 3-10
Source: OCTA

PLANNED CORRIDOR
Proposed BikewayExisting Bikeway

EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass III

PROPOSED BIKEWAYS
Class IClass IIClass IIISchoolsTransportation CenterRailCity BoundaryDistrict 5 BoundaryParks / Open Space LEGEND
Connection to Corridor A
Connection to
Corridor
F
Connection to Corridor F
NTONIO ANT Connection to Corridor H
H
H
F
F
A

T HARBOR NT H BOR A
Corridor IBikeway Corridor Details5.8 miles of existing Class I Parks within
1/4-mile Served
9 5
Schools within
1/4-mile Served
People within 1/4-mile
Served (approx.)

18.2K
Of Total
Corridor Length

8.6miles
Estimated
Project Cost
$3.8-4.6million

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 496
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.2 Eval

3.2.1 Cr
Each of t
District 5
through d
The crite
#1 and th
constraint
The crite
criteria w
the regio
results we
and sever
public du
agreed th
high speed
Table 3.

The regio
cities in p
facilities.
potential
safety, wh
implemen
phase of t
where the
Level
Repo
Econo
Tr
Pu
Phys
Comple
Comple
uation and
riteria and
the proposed
goals and ob
discussions w
ria and weigh
he PDT mee
ts, and other
ria were dev
were refined b
nal corridors
ere presente
ral weighting
ring the Rou
at the safety
d and high vo
1: Criteria W
onal corridors
prioritizing bik
The evaluat
benefit to bic
hile also havi
ntation. The t
the District 5
ere is interest
Criteria
of Traffic Str
rted Collisi
omic Efficie
rip Demand
ublic Support
ical Constrain
etes the Net
etes the Cor
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
d Ranking
Weighting
d regional bi
bjectives. Usin
with PDT mem
hting factors f
etings. The
factors that c
veloped and
based on the
s. During th
d to the PDT
factors were
undtable #1 m
factor (repo
olume roadwa
Weighting F
s were evalu
keway impro
tion process
cyclists in ter
ing significant
top ranked p
5 Bikeways C
t and desire t
I
W
F
ress
ons
ency
d
nts
twork
rridor
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
g
keway corrid
ng the Distric
mbers, and t
for District 5
criteria below
could influenc
presented to
feedback from
he Roundtabl
T members a
e adjusted ba
meeting. Fo
orted collision
ay characteris
Factor Adju
ated and ran
vements in o
s determined
ms of regiona
t public supp
proposed corr
Collaborative.
to continue th
Initial
Weight
Factor

1.0 0.5

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

S STRATEG
ransportation
dors were ev
ct 1 and 2 cri
hrough publi
5 have been a
w were used
ce the usage a
o the PDT m
m the PDT m
e #1 meeting
and the public
ased on the
or example, t
ns) needed to
stic of Distric
ustments
ked using the
order to com
which corr
al connectivit
port and limit
ridors will be
Cities may
he efforts of t
Adjusted
Weight
Factor

1.0 1.0

0.75 0.75

0.5 0.5

0.25 0.25

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
valuated base
iteria as a bas
c feedback r
altered based
d to account
and implemen
members duri
members and
g, the region
c. The evalu
feedback fro
through Roun
o have a high
ct 5.

Refineme
weighting
refinemen
and analy
factors w
higher w
than oth
from the
The crit
adjusted a
ese criteria t
mplete and/or
ridors would
ty, access to
ted physical
e further stud
individually a
the strategy.

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
ed on criter
seline, the cr
received durin
d on the input
t for a range
ntation of eac
ng the PDT
then used to
nal corridor
uation criteria
om the PDT
ndtable #1, m
her weighting
ents to th
g factors
nt of the cr
ysis methodo
were adjuste
weight on so
hers, based
PDT membe
teria weighti
as shown in T
to help guide
improve the
provide the
key destinatio
constraints t
died for feasib
advance the s

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
ria consistent
iteria were re
ng Roundtab
t from Round
e of opportu
ch corridor.

Meeting #3.
o evaluate and
evaluation an
a was then re
members an
most stakeho
g factor due t
he criteria
included
riteria descr
ology. Weig
ed to alloca
me criteria
on the fee
ers and the p
ing factors
Table 3.1.
e the impleme
e corridor bik
e greatest re
ons, and imp
that could im
bility in the se
study of a cor
DORS
43 t with
efined
le #1.
dtable
nities,
The
d rank
nalysis
efined
nd the
olders
to the
and
the
ription
ghting
ate a
more
dback
public.
were
enting
keway
elative
roved
mpede
econd
rridor

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 3.2
the top ra
details reg
Table 3.2
CRI
Level of
Stress
Reporte
Collision
Econom
Trip Dem
Public Su
Physical
Constra
Complet
Network
Complet
Corrido
below summ
anked corrido
garding the cr
2: Criteria
ITERIA
Traffic
d
ns
ic Efficiency
mand
upport
ints
tes the
k
tes the
r
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
marizes the cr
ors to be furt
riteria.

Description
Addresses p
posted spee
with higher
higher prior
Addresses s
normalized
lower volum
data (i.e. num
dataset is no
reported an
mile are sco
Measures th
normalized
product of t
length), and
Based on th
developed b
bicycle usag
local school
Incorporate
public input
surveys.

A tally of ph
freeway ram
a higher sco
Regional cor
bikeways to
number of i
Existing bike
bikeway net
Proportion
Caltrans sta
helps to prio
factor is also
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
riteria and we
ther studied
n and Weigh
perceive safet
ed limits. The
level of traffic
rity for treatm
safety through
by crashes pe
me of bike cra
mber of bicyc
ot as statistica
d easily unde
ored higher.
he financial be
by the numbe
the facility typ
divided by pl
e Bicycle Prio
by OCTA and
e including po
s and transit.
s public prior
was acquired
hysical constra
mps, and othe
ore as the cor
rridors which
help comple
ntersections
eway would b
twork is also
of the corrid
andards for th
oritize corrid
o part of the

S STRATEG
ransportation
eighting utilize
for feasibility
hting Summ

DESCRIPT
ty related to e
ere are four le
c stress are s
ment.
h five years of
er mile. Unlik
ashes and lack
clists using ea
ally sound. Ho
erstood. Cor
enefits associa
er of anticipat
pe, population
lanning level c
ority Index (B
d accounts for
opulation and
rities through
d through the
aints such as
r “chokepoin
rridor will be
h connect to
te the bikewa
with other ex
be weighted m
included in th
or that is alre
he bikeway ty
ors which are
LTS Index.

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
ed in the rank
y. Please refe
mary
TION
existing bikew
evels of traffi
scored higher
f reported cr
ke motor veh
k of robust, lo
ach corridor)
owever, it is
rridors with h
ated with the
ted users (wh
n density alon
construction
BPI). The BPI,
r various fact
d employment
h a Public Dem
e Roundtable
right-of-way,
nts”. Fewer co
easier to imp
other regiona
ays network.
xisting and pr
more heavily.
he BPI.
eady built to
ype that is bei
e already par

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
king analysis a
er to Append
way type and
c stress. Cor
r and represe
rash data,
hicle crash da
ong term exp
means that t
still common
higher collisio
e corridor,
hich is in turn
ng the corrido
costs estimat
which was
tors that influ
t density, land
mand Index. T
#1 and onlin
, on-street pa
onstraints res
plement.
al and local
Measured by
roposed bikew
Proximity to
at least minim
ing proposed
rtially built. Th

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
and in determ
ix D for addi
WE
rridors
nt a
ata, the
posure
this
nly
ons per
n a
or and
tes.
0 uence
d use,
0 The
e 0
arking,
sult in 0
y the
ways.
o the
0 mum
. This
his 0
DORS
44 mining
itional
EIGHT

1.0 1.0

0.75 0.75

0.5 0.5

0.25 0.25

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.2.2 Co
Planning
criterion.
similar fa
improvem
but do n
Appendix
The follow
Existin
Facilit
Propos
Facilit
Existin
Facilit
Propos
Facilit
ost Estimat
level cost es
The costs ut
acilities. Estim
ments, grading
ot include e
x D for detaile
wing are key
ng
ies
U
sed
ies
 C
s
C
w
s
b
 S
 S
in
n
 B
ng
ies
 U
(
 U
b
sed
ies
 S
c
 W
st
w
r
 S
 W
in
c
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
te Assump
stimates wer
tilized in the
mates include
g and retainin
nvironmental
ed cost estim
assumptions
Upgrade wayConstruction o
houlders on e
Class I bike fac
width allows fo
pace allocation
bicycle and ped
Signage for bike
Street crossing
ntersections o
no new traffic s
Bridges over flo
C
Upgrade wayparticularly at
Upgrade Class
bike lane on e
Stripe new Cla
curbside travel
Widening of st
tandard white
with cost repre
right-of-way ac
Signage for bike
Where on-stre
nstead of stree
component of
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ptions
re prepared
ranking analy
e costs for
ng walls, and
l clearance, d
ate assumptio
utilized durin
Class I (offfinding signs o
of new Class I
each side, per C
ilities, input fro
or better accom
n for heavily u
destrian usage,
e path and way
gs were assum
or a new cross
signals assume
ood control ch
Class II (onfinding along
t intersection
s II striping to
existing faciliti
ass II on-street
lane is greate
treet by 4 feet
e stripe at locat
esented on pe
cquisition.
e lane and for
eet parking exi
et widening. T
the next phas

S STRATEG
ransportation
for each co
ysis include hi
sign installat
d other antici
design, utility
ons for each c
ng the prepara
-street bike
on existing ro
bike path with
Caltrans stand
om cities durin
mmodation of
tilized corrido
, which public
y-finding
ed to be at-gr
walk (enhance
ed.
hannels were
-street bike
existing rout
ns).
o include a bu
es where fea
t bike lane with
r than 16 feet
to accommod
tions where c
er linear foot b
way-finding
ists, initial cost
he feasibility o
e of corridor a

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
rridor for u
gh-level estim
ations at inte
ipated constr
y impacts, or
corridor.
ation of the c
path):
outes, includi
h 10-foot-wide
dards. While C
ng the project
f maintenance
ors. It also mo
input has sugg
rade either usi
ed crosswalks
assumed, whe
lanes):
tes, including
uffer between
asible.
h standard wh
wide; buffer o
date new Clas
urbside travel
basis assuming
t assumes rem
of removing pa
analysis.

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
use in the ec
mates based o
ersections, m
ruction costs
r maintenanc
cost estimates
ng additional
e pavement an
Caltrans allows
t indicated that
vehicles and p
ore readily acc
gested is an im
ng nearby exis
assumed in lim
ere appropriat
additional bik
n vehicle trave
hite stripe at lo
or colored lan
ss II on-street b
lane is less th
general costs
moval of on-str
arking will be m

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
conomic effic
on cost averag
major interse
s including br
ce costs. Ref
s by facility ty
bike lane sign
nd 2-foot-wide
s 8-foot-wide
t the additiona
provides enha
commodates b
mportant facto
sting signalized
mited location
te
ke lane signag
el lanes and t
ocations where
es also assume
bike lane with
an 16 feet wid
for widening a
reet parking
more a
DORS
45 ciency
ges of
ection
ridges,
fer to
ype:
nage
e
al
nced
both
r.
d
ns);
ge
the
e
ed.
de;
and

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Existin
Facilit
Propos
Facilit
Existin
Facilit
Propos
Facilit
Table 3.4
5 with len
Table 3.3
Corridor
ID
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
TOTAL
Note: The cost
intersection im
clearance, des
ng
ies
 U
s
sed
ies
 Im
 E
b
fe
ng
ies  N
sed
ies
 In
v
 N
summarizes t
ngth and rang
3: Corridor
PCH
Laguna Canyo
El Toro/Alicia
Portola/Santa
Aliso Creek
Muirlands/Ca
Oso Parkway
Antonio/La P
San Juan Cre
ts shown above are
mprovements, gradin
ign, utility impacts,
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
C
Upgrade wayharrows, and
mplementatio
Enhanced bik
bikeway chan
easibility revie
N/A
nstallation of
vehicular trave
Narrowing of
the results of
e of costs sho
Cost Estim
Corridor
on
a/Laguna Canyon
a Margarita
abot/Camino Ca
y
Pata/Pico
ek
high-level estimate
ng and retaining wa
or maintenance cos
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Class III (onfinding along
d signage for r
on of sharrow
ke boulevard
nels were n
ew.

Class IV
raised islands
el lanes
vehicular lan
f the criteria
own.
mates
r Name
n
pistrano
s based on average
lls, and other anticip
sts.

S STRATEG
ransportation
street bike
existing rout
regional corri
ws, bike route
treatments
ot included
V (cycle trac
s serving as b
es by restripi
ranking for th
es of similar facilities
pated construction

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
routes):
tes, including
idor.
e signage, and
such as traf
in cost estim
cks)
buffers betwee
ing
he nine propo
Length (mile

19.0 8.8

15.3 6.7

20.3 17.9

8.9 18.0

8.6 123.5
s. Costs include cos
costs including bridg

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
additional bik
d way-finding
ffic circles, r
mates pendin
en a curbside
osed corridor
es) Cost
sts for sign installati
ges, but do not inclu

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
ke lane signag
signage.
roundabouts,
ng more det
e bike lane an
rs within Dist
t Range (millio
$11.5 – $14.1
$8.4 – $10.3
$12.2 – $15.0
$6.5 – $8.0
$8.2 – $10.0
$7.4 – $9.0
$5.5 – $6.8
$11.1 – $13.5
$3.8 – $4.6
$74.6 – $91.3
ions at intersections
ude environmental
DORS
46 ge,
and
ailed
d
trict
ons)
s, major

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.2.3 Re
Table 3.3
weighted
Table 3.4
Crit
Be
Possibl
A PCH Co
C El Toro/A
Laguna C
F
Muirland
Camino
D
Portola/S
Margarita
B Laguna C
E Aliso Cr
G Oso Park
H Antonio/
I San Juan
Note: RS = Ra
The corr
relative p
improved
could imp
esults of Cr
3 summarizes
scores accou
4: Corridor
teria
Rank
est
le Score
rridor 1
Alicia/
Canyon
2 ds/Cabot /
Capistrano 3
Santa
a 4
Canyon 5
eek 6
kway 7
/La Pata/Pico 8
Creek 9
aw Score; WS = We
idor evaluatio
otential bene
safety, while
pede impleme
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
riteria Ran
s the detaile
unt for norma
Scoring
Rank
Score
Level o
Traffic
Stress
Tot. RS W
100 4.0 20
70 3.8 19
65 3.9 20
60 2.3 12
59 3.9 20
54 4.0 20
50 1.1 6
48 3.7 19
44 3.4 17
38 0.7 3
eighted Score
on process d
efit to bicyclis
e also posses
entation.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
king
ed ranking ev
alizing betwee
of
c
s
Reported
Collisions

WS RS WS
0 3.0 20
9 2.9 20
0 2.4 16
2 1.1 8
0 1.1 7
0 1.4 9

0.1 1
9 0.4 3
7 0.9 7

0.0 0
determined t
sts in terms
ssing significa

S STRATEG
ransportation
valuation, wi
en 0 and 100,
Economic
Efficiency D

RS WS R

6.4 15 343

0.9 2 280

1.5 4 288

6.4 15 343

0.6 1 317

0.3 1 209

4.5 11 260

1.0 2 277

0.6 1 245

5.2 12 312
that corridor
of regional c
ant public su

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
ith raw and
, and weightin
Trip
emand
Pub
Inp

RS WS RS

3.6 15 96

0.1 12 96

8.8 13 21

3.6 15 47

7.1 14 19

9.2 9 62

0.8 11 58

7.3 12 13

5.1 11 23

2.6 14 22
rs A, C, and
connectivity, a
pport and lim

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
weighted sc
ng of each cri
blic
ut
Completes
the
Network

WS RS WS
10 1.7 5
10 0.8 3
2 1.0 4
5 0.9 3
2 1.7 5
6 0.6 2
6 1.0 4
1 1.0 4
2 0.5 2
2 0.9 3
F would pro
access to key
mited physica

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
cores shown
terion.

Physical
Constraints
C
pl
t
Cor

RS WS RS
3 10 0%
12 2 0.0
20 1 0.0
21 1 0.3
6 5 0.0
29 1 0.0
3 10 0.3
16 2 0.0
20 1 0.2
11 2 0.3
ovide the gre
y destinations
al constraints
DORS
47 . The
ometes
the
rridor
WS
5 1
5 1
5 5
1 5
2 1
eatest
s, and
s that

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The following section d
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
describes the
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
performance
Sa
Co
reg
tha
nu
tre
L
C
re
in
hi
bi

S STRATEG
ransportation
e of corridor
afety:
orridor C re
gard to the s
at this corrid
mber of col
eatment.

Level of Tra
Corridor B re
egard to Lev
ndicates that
igher posted
icycle faciliti

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
rs for each cri
eceived the h
safety criter
dor exhibite
lisions per m
affic Stress
eceived the
vel of Traffic
t the corrido
d speeds and
es.

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
iterion.
highest scor
rion. This in
ed a relativel
mile, and prio
s
highest scor
c Stress. Thi
or had relativ
d lack of des

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
e with
dicates
y higher
ority for
re with
is
vely
ignated
DORS
48 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

BIKEWAY
nge County T
Tr
Co
the
So
em
clo
Eco
Cor
effici
to co
Cor
relat
most
Pub
Cor
sup
icon
reco
and

S STRATEG
ransportation
rip Deman
orridor F rec
e most pote
ome of the m
mployment c
ose proximit
nomic Effic
ridor F rece
iency and ex
omplete/enh
ridor F is alr
tively minima
t potential d
blic Suppo
rridor A rec
port. Pacific
nic bicycling
ognized thro
d scenic bicyc

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
d: Bicycle
ceived the h
ential deman
most densely
centers in so
ty to Corrid
ciency
eived the hig
xhibited the
hance the co
ready in plac
al work to c
demand.
rt
ceived the hi
c Coast High
routes in C
oughout Ora
cling destina

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
Priority In
highest BPI sc
d for bicycle
y populated a
outh Orange
or F.
ghest score f
most benefi
orridor. The
ce and would
complete, bu
ighest score
hway is one
California and
ange County
ation.

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
dex (BPI)
core indicat
e demand.
and major
County are
for economi
it for the co
majority of
d require
ut serve the
for public
of the most
d is
y as a popula
DORS
49 ing
e in
c
st
t
ar

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

BIKEWAY
nge County T

S STRATEG
ransportation
Constrain
Corridor E
the least am
corridor is
grade cross
water body
Complete
Corridor’s
score with
This indicat
the most co
would requ
Complete
Corridor D
the most
This indicat
connection

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
nts
received th
mount of con
entirely offsings. It is als
y with minim
e the Corri
B, G, D, and
regard to co
tes that thes
omplete and
uire only gap
e the Netw
D received th
connections
tes that Co
point in the

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
he highest sc
nstraints. T
-street and h
so aligned al
mal slope.
idor
d C received
ompleting th
se corridors
d already in p
p closures to
work
he highest sc
s to other
orridor D se
e overall bike

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
ore for havi
he Aliso Cre
has minimal a
ong a natura
d the highest
he corridor.
are relative
place and
o complete.
core exhibit
bike facilit
erves as a k
e network.

DORS
50 ng
eek
atal
t
ly
ting
ies.
key

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

3.2.4 To
As shown
 C
 C
 C
Each of th
three cor
The Pac
Clemente
possible 2
strong pu
El Toro/
in Mission
by the lev
points), an
Muirland
Forest SE
ranking co
demand (
stress (12
These th
Bikeways
should be
the nine c
subsequen
are includ
op Ranked
n in Table 3.3
Corridor A:

Corridor C:

Corridor F: M
he District 5 c
ridors.
cific Coast H
e received the
20 points), re
blic input (10
Alicia/Lagu
n Viejo to the
vel of traffic s
nd trip deman
ds/Cabot/Ca
E to San Juan
orridor. This
15 out of 15
2 out of 20 po
ree corridor
Collaborativ
e shifted to p
corridors iden
nt stages of p
ded in transpo
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Corridors
the three to
Pacific Coast
El Toro/Alicia
Muirlands/Ca
cities, the Co
Highway Co
e highest sco
eported collis
0 out of 10).
na Canyon
e beach in Lag
stress (20 ou
nd (13 out of
amino Capi
n Capistrano
s score was d
possible poin
ossible points
rs will be fur
ve. The feas
parallel roadw
ntified in this
planning and d
ortation plans
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
p ranked cor
Highway;
a/Laguna Can
bot/Camino C
ounty of Oran
orridor, whic
ore. This sco
sions (20 out
Corridor, w
guna Beach, r
ut of a possib
f 15).
strano Cor
o and the Da
driven by eco
nts), trip dem
).
rther studied
sibility analys
ways, depend
report are o
design. This d
s and applicat

S STRATEG
ransportation
ridors are:
nyon;
Capistrano
nge, and Caltr
ch extends fr
ore was drive
t of 20 possib
which extends
received the s
ble 20 points)
ridor, which
ana Point/San
onomic effici
mand (12 out
d for feasibili
ses may dete
ding upon circ
only conceptu
design flexibi
ions for cons

3.0 REG
GY
Authority
rans have juri
rom the nort
en by the lev
ble points), tr
s from the ba
second highe
), reported co
h extends fro
n Clemente
iency (15 out
of 15) and t
ity in the se
ermine that
cumstances a
ual and their e
lity will ensur
struction fund

IONAL BIKEW
KOA
isdiction over
th side of Lag
vel of traffic s
rip demand (
ase of the San
st score. This
ollisions (16
m just north
Border, was
t of a possib
o a lesser ex
econd phase
segments of
and/or constr
exact alignme
re that the be
ds.

WAY CORRID
A Corporation
KTU+A
r portions of
guna Beach t
stress (19 ou
(12 out of 15
nta Ana Mou
s score was d
out of 20 po
of the I-5 in
the third h
ble 15 points)
xtent level of
of the Dist
certain corr
raints. Ther
ents may chan
est possible r
DORS
51 these
to San
t of a
5) and
ntains
driven
ossible
n Lake
ighest
), trip
traffic
rict 5
ridors
efore,
nge in
routes

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

4.0 AC

4.1 Pote
This secti
District 5
that are e
of time a
responsib
projects
Coordina
simultane
Each of t
“potential
acquisitio
restriping
or signing
as a Clas
enhancing
Table 4.
jurisdictio
Table 4.

Corri
A: Pacific
Highw
B: Laguna
CTION
ential Near
on identifies
5 to begin im
expected to h
as funds bec
bility of each
by providing
tion betwee
ously.
the nine reg
l near-term”
n, and may
a street to i
g and striping
ss I off-street
g the existing
1 summarize
onal responsib
1: Proposed
idor
c Coast
way
PCH
Cliff
PCH
East
El C
Cap
Esta
Canyon Lagu
at S
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
PLAN
r-Term Eff
potential nea
mplementation
have a low co
come availab
jurisdiction.
g letters of
en jurisdictio
gional bikewa
projects expe
require min
mplement a C
an existing p
t bikeway. F
Class II bike
es the prop
bilities. Figure
d Near-Term
Location
H (west city limit
f Dr)
H (Nyes Place to
tline Drive)
Camino Real (Ca
pistrano to Aven
acion)
una Canyon Roa
R-73
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
forts
ar-term proje
n of the prop
onstruction c
le. Impleme
OCTA woul
support, gr
ons is high
ay corridors
ected to requ
nimal environ
Class II bikew
paved off-stre
For existing
lane to a buff
posed near-te
e 4.1 shows t
m Improvem
O
Op
t to L
Beac
o L
Beac
mino
ida San
ad
Co
O
C

S STRATEG
ransportation
ects that can
posed corrido
cost and can
entation and
d assist local
rant notificat
hly encourag
has been r
uire minimum
nmental revie
way, signing a
eet path or m
Class II bike
fered bike lan
erm improv
the locations
ments
Owner/
perator
P
Laguna
ch/Caltrans
N
(o
Laguna
ch/Caltrans
N
(o
Clemente N
ounty of
Orange /
Caltrans
St
fr
GY
Authority
be implemen
ors. Potentia
be implemen
funding of
jurisdictions
tions and gu
ged to imp
reviewed at
m capital inves
ew. These t
street to des
maintenance ro
e lanes, if the
ne can be eas
vements alon
of the propo
Proposed Impr
New Class II
on-street, stripin
New Class II
on-street, stripin
New Class IV
tripe bike lanes
reeway interchan
4 KOA
nted by each o
l near-term p
nted in a relat
these projec
s in obtaining
uidance, and
plement bike
a conceptua
stment, little
types of pro
signate it as a
oad of sufficie
ere is enoug
ily implement
ng with esti
osed near-term
rovement
Le
(
ng) 5
ng)
1 1
through
nge
3 4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
of the cities w
projects are
tively short p
cts would b
g funding for
design solu
eway connec
l level to id
or no right-o
ojects may in
a Class III bik
ent width to
gh roadway w
ted.
imated costs
m improveme
ength
feet)
Co
Estim
5,970 $65,
4,230 $156
0,000 $524
3,000 $33,0
PLAN
52 within
those
period
e the
these
utions.
ctions
dentify
of-way
nclude
keway,
serve
width,
s and
ents.
ost
mate
670
,530
,000
000

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Corri
C: El Toro
/ Laguna
D: Portol
Marga
E: Aliso
F: Muir
Cabot/C
Capist
G: Oso P
H: Anton
Pata /
idor
o / Alicia
Canyon
Broa
Can
la / Santa
arita
SR-2
Park
Creek Aliso
rlands/
Camino
trano
Cam
(Me
sout
Via
Ram
Bein
Via
Via
Via
to V
Via
Fort
Cap
Cali
Via
Parkway
Oso
Free
Oso
Park
nio / La
Pico
La P
to D
La P
Salu
Ave
Fron
to C
Pico
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Location
adway Street (L
nyon Road to PC
241 and Portola
kway
o Creek Trail
mino Capistrano
trolink Station t
th city limit)
California (Cam
mblas to Calle
nvenido)
California (Via V
Lopez)
Fortuna (Via Ca
Via Sacramento)
Sacramento (Via
tuna to Camino
pistrano) & Via
fornia (via Lope
Fortuna)
o Parkway at I-5
eway
o Parkway at Mo
kway
Pata - west city l
Del Rio
Pata - Del Rio to
da
nida Pico (Calle
ntera/Avenida P
Calle De Industr
o Plaza)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
O
Op
aguna
CH) Lagu
Co
O
C
Co
O
Mis
Lak
Lagu
Lag
Al
to Lagu
ino Las
San
Velez to
Da
alifornia
Da
a
z to
Da
OC
C
oulton
Al
imits San
o Calle San
residio
ias/Via San

S STRATEG
ransportation
Owner/
perator
P
una Beach
U
(s
ounty of
Orange /
Caltrans
C
st
in
ounty of
Orange,
U
ad
sion Viejo
ke Forest
una Woods
guna Hills
iso Viejo
una Niguel
N
si
Clemente
N
(o
ana Point
N
(o
ana Point
N
(o
ana Point
N
(o
CTA and
Caltrans
A
st
in
p
iso Viejo
A
in
Clemente
N
st
Clemente
N
p
Clemente
N
st
GY
Authority
Proposed Impr
Upgrade Existing
signage and othe
Class II buffered
triped through
nterchange
Upgrade existing
dding way-findin
New Class III (on
ignage)
New Class III
on-street, signag
New Class II
on-street, stripin
New Class III
on-street, signag
New Class III
on-street, signag
Add buffered clas
triping through
ntersection (with
aint)
Add Class II strip
ntersection
New Class II (on
triping)
New Class I (offaving)
New Class II (on
triping)
4 KOA
rovement
Le
(
Facility
er)
1 bikeway
3 Class I by
ng signage
4 5
3 2
3 1
n-street, 3
ge)
ng)
ge)
ge)
1 ss II
h green
5 ping to the
-street
-street
1 -street
3 4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
ength
feet)
Co
Estim
1,510 $45
3,000 $33,0
4,670 $1,4
5,930 $1,7
0,050 $9,0
2,870 $86
3,410 $1,0
4,550 $4,3
3,710 $9,2
510 $1,2
540 $5,9
840 $2,1
1,950 $4,8
5,500 $75,0
900 $10,0
870 $9,5
1,200 $180
3,000 $33,0
PLAN
53 ost
mate
53 000
401
779
015
61 023
365
275
275
940
100
875
000
000
570
,000
000

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Corri
I: San Juan
dor
Creek
Ave
Arro
Call
Stat
East
Cre
Trai
East
Cre
PCH
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Location
nida Siega/Calle
oyo to Calle Jard
e Jardin to Doh
e Beach
t side of San Juan
ek (Trabuco Cr
il to Stonehill Dr
t side of San Juan
ek (Stonehill Dr
H)
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
O
Op
din
S
Ca
eny Da
n
reek
r)
S
Ca
n
r to Da

S STRATEG
ransportation
Owner/
perator
P
San Juan
apistrano
U
(S
ana Point
U
(S
San Juan
apistrano
N
p
ana Point
N
p
GY
Authority
Proposed Impr
Upgrade Existing
Signage and Oth
Upgrade Existing
Signage and Oth
New Class 1 - of
aving
New Class 1 - of
aving
4 KOA
rovement
Le
(
Facility
her)
1 Facility
her) 6
ff street
7 ff street 3

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
ength
feet)
Co
Estim
9,700 $5,9
6,240 $1,8
7,620 $1,143
3,810 $571
PLAN
54 ost
mate
931
872
3,000
,500

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Pacific
Ocean
0 1.25 2.5 5
Miles
n¤
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nm nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
ORTEGA
ALICIA
OSO

EL TORO

ANTONIO
LA PAZ

MOULTON

MARGUER TI E

N GI UEL

JERONIMO

LOS AL SI OS

LAGUNA CANYON

CROWN VALLEY

LAKE FOREST
FELIPE

ALISO CREEK
TOLEDO

AVENIDA PICO

OLYMP AI D

EL CAMINO REAL
ANO

DEL OBISPO

SANTA MARGARITA

ROCKFIELD

PACIFIC COAST

MELINDA

LA PATA
SELVA

STONEHILL
ALIPAZ

ALISO VIEJO

PACIFIC PARK

CAMINO DEL AVION
TALEGA

RANCHO VIEJO

SAN JUAN CREEK

PACIFIC ISLAND

DE VALENCI

RIDGELINE

RIDGE ROUTE

AVENIDA LA PATA

GLENN RANCH

H GI HLANDS
AVERY

GLENWOOD

DEL RIO

QUAIL HILL

WOOD CANYON

GLENNEYRE

MARINA HILLS

CAMINO DE LOS MARES

AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA

BEACON HILL

DEL PRADO

ALMAALDEA

AVEN DI A DE LAS FLORES

AMINO LAS RAMBLAS

VISTA HERMOSA

PLANO TRABUCO

SANTA MARIA

CLUB HOUSE

PASEO DE COLINAS

LAGUNA HILLS

AVEN DI A DE LAS BANDERAS
RANCHO
TRONG

DANA POINT HARBOR

TRABUCO CREEK

AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA

CAMINO VERA CRUZ

CAMINO DE ESTRELLA
FOREST

SUNNYHILL

PORTOLA

LA PATA

TRABUCO

CAMINO CAPISTRANO
TON

RIDGE ROUTE
RANCHO
UVSR-261
UVSR-241
UVSR-241
UVSR-73
§¨¦I-5
-5
§¨¦I-5
Sand Canyon
Reservoir
Laguna
Reservoir
El Toro
Reservoir
Veeh
Reservoir
Lagunas
Sulphur
Creek
Reservoir
Krum
Reservoir
PalisadesReservoir
C
Sp
Lake
Mission
Viejo
COUNTY
IRVINE
LAKE
FOREST

MISSION
VIEJO
SAN

CLEMENTE
COUNTY
LAGUNA
NIGUEL

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
LAGUNA
BEACH
ALISO
VIEJO
DANA
POINT
HILLS
COUNTY
LAGUNA
WOODS

RANCHO SANTA

MARGARITA
SUNN
VU
VU
I
Transportation CenterRailSchoolsCollegesParks / Open SpaceWaterbodyCity BoundarySupervisorial District 5 nm
nm
n¤
LEGEND
Source: OCTA
OCTA District 5 Bikeways Collaborative

NEAR TERM CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
Figure 4-1

BIKEWAY CORRIDORS
T
A: Pacific Coast HighwayB: Laguna CanyonC: El Toro/AliciaD: Portola/Santa MargaritaE: Aliso CreekF: Muirlands/Cabot/Camino CapistranoG: Oso ParkwayH: Antonio/La Pata/PicoI: San Juan Creek F
F
D
B
B
H
H
H
I
E
E
A
A
G
G
C
C
C
Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
Near Term
Project

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 509
Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

4.2 Prog
Of the fiv
and evalu
routes by
utilization

4.2.1 En
Safe Route
The Safe
infrastruct
school on
For mor
www.bike
Ride/Bike/
grammatic
ve E’s of bicyc
ation. Progra
y providing t
n.
ncouragem
es to School Pr
Routes to S
ture develop
n a regular bas
re informatio
eleague.org/bi
/Bike-Month
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
c Recomme
cle planning, fo
ams should co
the educatio
ment
rogram
chool (SRTS)
pment with th
sis.
on on Nat
ikemonth. F
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
endations
our are relate
omplement e
on and encou
) Program (w
he goal of in
ional Bike
For a list of e

S STRATEG
ransportation
ed to program
engineering im
uragement to
www.saferout
creasing the
The p
mater
safe ro
Active
bike a
catego
be use
progra
biking
grants
more
Bike m
each
campa
benefi
bicycl
OCTA
includ
numb
additio
their o
Month, go
events in Or
GY
Authority
ms; encourag
mprovements
o ensure th
tesinfo.org) f
number of c
program offer
rials to help
outes to scho
e Transportat
and pedestria
ory for SRTS
ed for either
ams that pr
to school. O
s is that they
on funding o
month is a na
year. The
aign is to incr
its and imp
ing across al
A has an ac
des not only
er of events
on, many of
own bike-rela
to the Le
range County
4 KOA
gement, educa
s such as bike
at the facilit
focuses on bo
children who
rs promotion
communities
ools program
tion Program
an programs
S programs.
r infrastructu
romote child
One of the ad
y require no
pportunities,
ationwide eve
e intent of
rease awaren
pact, as we
ll segments o
ctive campaig
y a bike-toheld through
f the cities i
ated events.
eague of Am
y, see www.o

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
ation, enforce
e paths, lanes
ties get max
oth educatio
o walk and bi
nal and educa
s develop eff
ms. The state
m (ATP) for fu
includes a sp
These grant
ure or educa
dren walking
dvantages of
local match.
see Chapter
ent held in M
the month
ess of bicycli
ell as enco
of the popul
gn each May
work day, b
out the mont
in District 5
merican Bicy
octa.net/Share
PLAN
56 ement
s, and
ximum
n and
ike to
ational
fective
ewide
unding
pecific
ts can
ational
g and
SRTS
. For
r 6.

May of
long
ng, its
ourage
lation.
y that
but a
th. In
hold
yclists
e-the7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and EmployerMany com
work wit
about com
an article
"How to
work." It
(and gove
their emp
Launch Pa
When a n
realize tha
Conductin
dignitaries
businesse
raise early
Elected a
involved
used to h
and cham
-Based Encou
mpanies, OC
th or provide
mmuting by
published in
encourage y
has a checkl
ernment agen
ployees to bik
rty for New Bi
new bikeway
at they have i
ng opening e
s, school gr
s to particip
y awareness a
nd school of
in these type
highlight prog
pioned in the
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
uragement Pr
CTA, and pa
e information
bicycle. A us
n Inc Magazin
your employ
list showing w
ncies) can do
ke to work.
ikeways
is built, som
improved bik
events where
oups, bike c
pate is a gre
and use of ne
fficials are oft
es of events,
grams they h
e community.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
rograms
rticipating cit
n to employ
seful resource
ne in 2010 tit
yees to bike
what compan
o to encour
e residents w
keway options
you invite lo
clubs, and lo
eat way to h
ew facilities.
ten eager to
as they can
have encourag

S STRATEG
ransportation
ties
yees
e is
tled
to
nies
rage
will become a
s available.
ocal
ocal
help
be
be
ged
GY
Authority
aware of it an
Open Street
Open stre
Sunday Pa
Streets, and
have becom
the County
events ha
Angeles to
San Diego.
attract ove
encouraged
do not reg
and enjoy c
4 KOA
nd use it, wh
ts Events
ets events h
arkways, C
d Sunday Stre
me increasing
y. In Souther
ave been h
Santa Ana, G
Los Angeles
r 100,000 pa
d large numb
gularly ride a
car-free city s

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
ile others ma
have many n
iclovias, Sum
eets. These e
gly popular a
rn California,
hosted from
Garden Grove
s's events rou
rticipants and
ers of people
bike to com
streets.

PLAN
57 ay not
names:
mmer
events
across
these
Los
e, and
utinely
d have
e who
me out

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and One of t
people ho
CicLAvia:
events.

For a gui
www.bike
Bicycle Fri
transport
reducing t
Being rec
retaining
working a
opportun
bicycling.
employee
friendly cu
In Orange
recognitio
bike frien
For inform
bike frien
he many ben
ow easy it is t
Study Finds
de to condu
ewalkalliance.
iendly Comm
ation and rec
traffic conges
ognized as a
new resident
adults to agin
ity to choose
Businesses a
es and custom
ulture.
e County, th
on as Bike Fr
dly.
mation on th
dly status see
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
nefits of these
to dine and s
Gain To Lo
cting an ope
org/resource
munity
creation. Mak
stion, improvi
bike friendly
ts as well as
ng baby boom
e to get out
are looking t
mers; one of
he cities of Ir
riendly Comm
he advantages
e the League o
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
e events is h
hop by bike.
ocal Business
n streets eve
es/reports/ope
king bicycling
ng air quality
community
s businesses.
mers are look
of their vehic
o locate and
their import
rvine and Hu
munities. Nati
s of being rec
of American

S STRATEG
ransportation
highlighting th
A recent stu
ses" discusses
ent, go to th
en-streets-gu
The
comm
to ri
encou
the le
by pr
and
safe and conv
and improvin
is becoming
People of a
king for cities
cle and use a
grow in citie
tant criteria
untington Bea
ionwide, ove
cognized as a
Bicyclists web
GY
Authority
he businesses
dy from UCL
s the significa
he Alliance fo
uide.

League of A
munities that
ide your bi
urage bicyclis
eague’s websi
roviding safe
encouragin
venient are k
ng quality of l
more and mo
all ages rangi
that offer an
alternative for
es that offer
has become
ach, along w
r 300 comm
a bike friendl
bsite www.bi
4 KOA
s along the r
LA, titled "Ec
ant economi
or Biking and
American Bic
are good, fr
ke; cities th
sts and bicycl
ite, "A BFC w
accommoda
ng people
keys to impro
life."
ore importan
ing from sch
n active lifesty
rms of transp
a lifestyle tha
having a bike
with the Coun
unities are re
ly community
keleague.org/

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
route and sho
onomic impa
c impact of
d Walking we
cyclists recog
riendly, safe p
hat welcome
ling. Accord
welcomes bicy
ations for bic
to bike
oving public h
nt in attractin
hool age, to
yle and provi
portation inc
at will attract
e (and pedes
nty, have ach
ecognized as
y and on obt
/bfa.

PLAN
58 owing
acts of
these
ebsite:
gnizes
places
e and
ing to
yclists
cycling
for
health,
ng and
newly
ide an
luding
t new
strian)
hieved
being
taining

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

4.2.2 Ed
Bicycle Re
Educating
understan
to deal w
bicyclists
rules, suc
OCTA h
Ride/Bike/
Bicycle re
 A
 B
 B
 B
 B
 m
Marketing
Education
notify an
motorists
OCTA
marketing
new faci
events as
of facilit
ceremoni
private a
invited to
school an
ducation
esource Webs
both bicycle
nd safe bicycli
with traffic a
have the sam
h as the 3-foo
osts several
/Riding-in-Or
esource webs
Advertisement
icycling tips in
o Carry
o Proper
o Ride in
o Tips ca
ikeway maint
icycle events
icycle traffic s
multilingual ve
g Concurrent
n about new
nd educate
s about newl
has a hist
g using local
lities. The
sociated with
ties, such a
es and bike
and governm
o participate
d youth grou
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
site
es and motor
ing behavior a
s well as pe
me rights tha
ot law.
pages dedica
range-County
ites may also
ts for all bikew
ncluding infor
items using b
rly lock a bike
n the rain wit
an also includ
tenance and r
calendar
skills classes i
rsions
with New Fa
w facilities ca
both cyclist
y installed fa
tory of ef
events to h
ese include
h opening seg
as ribbon
rides where
mental entitie
e, along with
ps.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
rists is an imp
and the basic
edestrians an
at vehicle dri
ated to bicyc
y/OC-Bikeway
include:
ways after im
rmation on ho
baskets and p
e
th help from f
de information
repair phone
information
acilities
an help
ts and
acilities.
ffective
ighlight
special
gments
cutting
e local
es are
h local

S STRATEG
ransportation
portant aspec
s of bicycle m
d other bicy
ivers have.
cling and bic
ys-Map/
mplementation
ow to:
anniers
fenders and r
n on the impo
numbers
GY
Authority
ct of being b
maintenance.
yclists. Moto
Now motori
cycle safety:
n
rain gear
ortance of bic
4 KOA
ike friendly.

They need t
rists need to
ists need to
http://www.o
cycle lights an

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
Bicyclists ne
to understand
o understand
understand
octa.net/Share
nd reflectors.

PLAN
59 eed to
d how
d that
safety
e-the-
.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Social me
marketing
that conn
Adult Bicy
Most adu
road, and
Now, ma
cases, eve
Adult clas
www.bike
maintenan
skills in a
OCTA de
informat
edia and the w
g campaign as
ects northern
ycling Traffic
lt bicyclists h
bicycle hand
ny of the adu
en riding in th
sses offered
eleague.org.
nce. More im
safe environm
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
edicates a page
tion
web are also
ssociated with
n inland OC w
Skills Classes
have not rece
dling skills. If
ults who are
heir neighborh
by League o
These cours
portantly the
ment, accomp
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
of its website t
important to
h the OC Loo
with the beac
s
eived any for
f they receive
being encour
hood.
f American B
ses combine
ey offer the b
panied by a ce

S STRATEG
ransportation
to bicycle
ools for mark
op, a 66-mile
ch communiti
A
bi
im
O
co
m
in
pa
O
be
m
Fu
ca
di
rmal training
ed any bike e
raged to retu
Bicyclist certi
some short
icyclist the op
ertified instru
GY
Authority
keting new fa
largely off-st
ies can be fou
A marketing
icyclists and
mportant part
OCTA has a
ommunity ou
media, and cr
ncluding item
articular thos
OCTA's yearl
een very eff
message for bo
unding sourc
an be cond
iscussed in C
on safe bicyc
ducation at a
urn to bicycli
ified instructo
lectures abo
pportunity to
uctor.
4 KOA
acilities. A re
treet bike and
und at www.o
g campaign
d pedestrian
t of creating p
a strong his
utreach prog
reating public
ms such as
se placed on O
ly Bike Mon
fective at co
oth motorists
ces for simila
ucted at th
hapter 6.
cling practice
all, it was mo
ng feel uncom
ors are availa
ut riding skil
o learn new s

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
ecent example
d pedestrian f
octa.net/OCL
that high
n safety is
public awaren
story of cre
grams, using
c service mes
banner ad
OCTA busses
nth Campaign
onveying a
s and bicyclist
ar campaigns
he city leve
s, the rules o
ost likely as a
mfortable, in
able by cont
ls and simple
kills or refres
PLAN
60 e of a
facility
LOOP
hlights
s an
ness.
eating
social
ssages
ds, in
s.
n has
safety
ts.
s that
el are
of the
child.
many
tacting
e bike
sh old

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Youth Bicy
School-ba
skills. Sa
typically o
programs
Bike train
set route
cases the
organized
and/or bik
an alterna
cycle Skills Cla
ased bicycle e
afe routes to
offered for u
is discussed
ns and walkin
at a set time
se are forma
d and coordin
ke to school.
ative to the cl
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
asses
education pro
schools (SR
upper elemen
in Chapter 6
g school bus
e, are being ad
al programs t
ated informa
These prog
lass-room or
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ograms educat
RTS) educatio
ntary and mid
.
es, where pa
dded in more
that are spon
lly by parents
grams allow c
school-yard

S STRATEG
ransportation
A rec
of "b
train
route
years
More
imple
curre
route
week
grou
assist
infor
http:/
te students a
onal grants ar
ddle school
arents or staf
e and more s
nsored by the
s who want t
children with
based training
GY
Authority
cent innovati
bike trains" fo
runs on a
e. Bike train
s to aid child
e recently,
emented for
ently eight ro
es a group w
k. Each ride h
p along the
tance that
rmation on
//labiketrains
about the rule
re available f
age children.
ff guide stude
schools acros
e school. In
the children t
different skil
g.
4 KOA
on in LA has
or adults. Jus
given sched
ns have been
dren going to
a similar c
r adults in
outes in LA.
will meet one
has a conduct
route as we
is necessa
Bike Trains
.com/
es of the road
for these pro
. Funding st
ents to and fr
s Southern C
other cases
to have the o
ll levels to int

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
been the cre
st as a train, a
dule over a
n used for se
o and from sc
oncept has
LA. There
For each of
e or two day
tor who guide
ell as provide
ry. For
s for Adults
d and safe bic
ograms, whic
trategies for
rom school o
California. In
the program
pportunity to
teract and pr
PLAN
61 eation
a bike
given
everal
chool.
been
e are
these
ys per
es the
es any
more
s see
cycling
ch are
these
over a
some
ms are
o walk
rovide

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

4.2.3 En
Bicycle Pa
Police bic
opportun
patrol off
These off
appropria
Speed fee
their spee
A relative
over the
green, allo
at two
watch?v=x
Targeted
Targeted
is low. A
effective
hazardous
According
very shor
disadvanta
than mon
safety.fhw
nforcement
atrol
cycle patrols
ity for office
ficers know b
ficers can de
ate.
edback signs
ed and encou
ely new traffic
legal speed l
owing the veh
locations.
x5zhziy7TIA
Enforcement
enforcement
According to
when crash,
s due to illega
g to the FHW
rt period of ti
age is that the
ths or years.”
wa.dot.gov/inte
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
t
not only in
rs to interac
both the law
monstrate an
have been sh
raging them t
c engineering
imit, the light
hicle to proce
A video s
t
t uses the foc
the Federal
citation or
al driving prac
WA, "The adva
me and ident
e effectivenes
” For more i
ersection/res
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ncrease the m
ct with bicyc
w as well as t
nd explain sa
hown to be a
to reduce the
tool involves
t turns red.
eed. The Cit
showing how
cused efforts
Highway Tr
other sourc
ctices.
antage of targ
tified problem
ss is usually m
nformation o
sources/intsaf

S STRATEG
ransportation
mobility of o
lists in a non
the challenge
afe riding tec
an effective m
eir speed.
s setting traff
Once the ve
ty of Long Bea
w this wor
of police off
raffic Adminis
ces of inform
geted enforce
ms can be add
measured in te
on targeted en
festratbro/ug
GY
Authority
officers in de
n-confrontati
es faced by b
chniques as w
Speed Feedb
Vehicle spe
of the crash
The adjacen
to School (
traffic, show
the percent
in a crash is
mph, the pe
means of ma
fic lights for w
ehicle slows
ach has recen
rks can be
ficers at know
stration (FHW
mation sugge
ement is that
dressed almos
erms of days
nforcement s

1.cfm
4 KOA
ense areas b
onal, low ke
bicyclists on a
well as provi
back Signs and
eeds greatly a
h for the bicyc
nt figure, from
(SRTS) guide
ws that at a s
tage of pedes
s under 5% bu
ercentage is 8
king the driv
when vehicles
to below the
ntly installed t
seen at w
wn locations
WA) these p
ests that the
it can be imp
st immediately
and perhaps
see:

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
but also offe
ey manor. B
a day-to-day
de enforcem
d Rest in Red S
affect the se
clist or pedes
m the Safe R
to slowing
speed of 20
strians being
ut at a speed
85%.
ver more awa
s approach a
e limit, it wil
these with su
www.youtube
where comp
rograms are
e site is unu
plemented in
y. The
weeks, rathe
PLAN
62 er the
Bicycle
basis.
ment if
Signals
everity
strian.

Routes
down
MPH,
killed
of 40
are of
signal
l turn
uccess
e.com/
pliance
most
usually
a
er

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Adult Bicy
A few citi
when bicy
program
program f
these pro

4.2.4 Ev
Evaluation
Surveys
Surveys a
intercept
be condu
behaviora
(www.bik
In additio
specific pr
into the p
Recently,
counts, es
(National
ycle Education
es in the Stat
yclists are giv
rather than p
for teens; Ma
ograms have n
valuation
n programs m
are useful fo
surveys cond
cted online.
al information
kepeddocume
on to yearly c
roject. Most
project plans.
several cities
stablishing da
Bicycle and P
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
n Diversion P
te of Californ
ven a traffic
paying the fu
arin County h
not been wide
measure and e
or eliciting in
ducted in the
For this rep
n as well as in
entation.org).
counts, count
projects that
s have starte
ily, weekly, o
Pedestrian Do
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Program
nia have adopt
ticket they a
ull price of th
has an adult p
ely adopted a
evaluate the im
nfrastructural
field during e
port both on
dications of p
ts can be don
t are funded b
d to use aut
r monthly va
ocumentation

S STRATEG
ransportation
ted adult bicy
are provided
he ticket. At
rogram. Due
cross the stat
mpact of proj
deficiency a
events or in l
line and face
preferred rou
Counts
Bike coun
program.

Documenta
challenges f
lack of doc
accurate an
measure th
Standard fo
downloade
Documenta
ne on a befo
by governmen
omated coun
riations, and
n project: Aut
GY
Authority
ycle diversion
d the opportu
t the present
e to potential
te.
jects, policies
and attitudina
ocations such
e-to-face surv
utes and to de
ts are an
As the Na
ation Project
facing the bic
umentation o
nd consistent
he impacts of
orms and inst
d from the N
ation Project
ore and after
nt grants rou
nters that are
almost alway
tomatic coun
4 KOA
n programs.
unity to take
t time Huntin
l conflicts wit
s and program
al informatio
h as bike sho
veys were use
etermine cor
important p
ational Bicycl
t says, "One
cycle and ped
on usage and
demand figur
investments
tructions for b
National Bicy
website
basis to sho
tinely incorpo
e useful in co
ys requiring fe
nt technologie

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
In these prog
e a bike educ
ngton Beach
th state regula
ms.
on. These ma
ps. They ma
ed to collect
ridor ranking
part of any
le and Pede
e of the gre
destrian field
demand. Wi
res, it is diffic
in these mod
bike counts c
ycle and Pede
ow the impac
orate these c
ollecting long
ewer person
es).

PLAN
63 grams,
cation
has a
ations
ay be
ay also
t both
gs.
bike
estrian
eatest
is the
ithout
cult to
des."
can be
estrian
t of a
counts
term
hours

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The phot
Santa Rive
Several o
Minneapo
counters
These co
number o
on a real t
Automate
helping d
programs
in data
($2,000-$
be incorp
A recent
compile, o
a result o
UCLA. T
review, an
informatio
o on the pre
er Trail.
other cities
olis, MN and
such as the
ounters not
of bicyclists, b
time basis. (P
ed counters a
determine t
. With their
collection an
$3,000 or les
orated in mo
project spon
organize, mak
of the project
The project
nd a white p
on on the Bik
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
evious page sh
including
Arlington, VA
e one show
only keep
but visibly dis
Photo by Eco
are an import
the effective
r effectivenes
nd their rea
s per installa
ost future pro
nsored jointly
ke accessible
t, a clearingho
includes info
aper on bike
ke Count Clea
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
hows one for
Portland, O
A, are installi
wn on the le
track of t
play the resu
o-Counter)
tant element
eness of bi
s and efficien
asonable co
ation), they c
ojects.
y by SCAG
and create a
ouse for bike
ormation on
counts, trav
aringhouse se

S STRATEG
ransportation
rm of counte
OR,
ing
eft.
the
ults
in
ike
ncy
sts
can
and the Los
standard for
count data h
best practice
vel demand m
ee www.bikec
GY
Authority
er that has re
Angeles Co
r bike count d
has been crea
es and forms
modeling, and
counts.luskin.
4 KOA
ecently been
unty MTA is
data in South
ated and is be
s for bike co
d benefits esti
.ucla.edu.

4.0 ACTION P
A Corporation
KTU+A
installed in o
s designed to
ern Californi
eing maintain
ounts, a liter
imation. For
PLAN
64 on the
o help
a. As
ned by
rature
more

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.0 BI

5.1 Intro
This chap
within the
the other
of Distric
network a
The follow
nationwid
relaying im
existing su
throughou
treatment

5.1.1 Na
Several ag
commonly
CYCLE
oduction
pter is intend
e District 5 s
r Districts in
ct 5. Many of
also exists th
wing pages p
de. Within th
mportant de
ummary guid
ut and shou
ts featured he
ational Sta
gencies and
y used manua
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
FACILI
ed to assist t
tudy area in
Orange Cou
f these corrid
roughout Dis
ull together b
he design sec
sign informat
ance from cu
ld be the fir
ere.
andards
organizations
als that outlin
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T

ITY TOO
the Orange C
the selection
nty in which
dors have ex
strict 5.
best practice
ction, treatm
tion and disc
urrent or upc
rst source o
s provide de
ne these stand

S STRATEG
ransportation
OLKIT
County Tran
and design o
corridors ar
isting bike la
s by facility t
ments are cov
cussion, exam
coming draft s
of information
esign standard
dards are liste

5.0 GY
Authority
nsportation A
of bicycle faci
re on major a
nes; however
type from pu
vered within
mple photos,
standards. Ex
n when seek
ds for bike
ed below.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
Authority and
ilities. Distric
arterials due
r an extensiv
blic agencies
n a single-she
schematics (
xisting standar
king to imple
facilities in t

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
local jurisdic
ct 5 is unique
to the topog
ve shared-use
and municip
eet tabular fo
(if applicable)
rds are refere
ement any o
the US. The
OLKIT
65 ctions
e from
graphy
e path
palities
ormat
), and
enced
of the
most

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The Fede
the stand
public str
the basis o
To furthe
various b
(e.g., can
Traffic Co
There are
often sub
Rulings is
materials.

FHWA, p
American
Developm
layout of
informatio
and recom
The Natio
is the new
current st
seeking to
way prese
internatio
Meeting t
bicycle an
Accessibil
Standards
includes r
Some of t
the MUTC
all cases,
context o
eral Highway
ards used by
eets, highway
of the Califor
er clarify the
icycle related
be impleme
ontrol Device
e some newe
bject to expe
s a resource
Copies of v
progress repo
Association
ment of Bicyc
specific bicy
on, such as m
mmended sign
onal Associat
west publicati
tate of the p
o improve bic
ent unique ch
onally and in m
the requirem
nd pedestrian
lity Guideline
s) contain gui
requirements
these treatme
CD, although
engineering
of each treatm
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Administrati
y traffic engin
ys, bikeways,
rnia MUTCD,
MUTCD, th
d signs, mark
ented, curren
es.
er bikeway tre
riments, inte
that allows
various docum
orts, and final
n of State H
cle Facilities,
cle facilities.
minimum side
nage and pave
ion of City T
ion of nation
ractice design
cycle transpor
hallenges. All
many cities ar
ments of the A
facility proje
es (PROWA
dance and sta
for sidewalk
ents are not d
h many of the
judgment is
ment, given th
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
on’s Manual
neers nationw
and private r
, which is the
e FHWA cre
kings, signals,
ntly experime
eatments that
rpretations a
website visit
ments (such
reports) are
Highway and
updated in
The standard
ewalk widths,
ement markin
ransportation
ally recognize
ns. The inten
rtation in plac
of the NAC
round the US
Americans w
ect. The Unite
AG) and the
andards, resp
curb ramps,
directly refer
e elements of
recommende
he many comp

S STRATEG
ransportation
on Uniform
wide to instal
roads open t
e standard use
eated a table
and other tr
ental). See B
t may not be
and official ru
tors to obta
as incoming
available on t
d Transporta
June 2012 p
ds and guide
, bicycle lane
ngs.
n Officials’ (N
ed bikeway d
nt of the guid
ces where co
TO Urban B
.
with Disabiliti
ed States Acc
e 2010 ADA
pectively, for t
slope require
renced in the
f these treatm
ed to ensure
plexities of ur

5.0 GY
Authority
Traffic Cont
l and maintai
to public traff
ed by most ci
of contempo
reatments an
icycle Faciliti
e explicitly co
ulings by the
ain informatio
request lette
this website.
ation Official
provides guid
lines present
e dimensions,
NACTO) 201
design standar
de is to offer
ompeting dem
Bikeway Desig
es Act (ADA
cess Board’s
A Standards
the construct
ements, and p
current vers
ments are fou
e that the ap
rban streets.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
trol Devices
in traffic con
fic. The FHW
ities in Califo
orary bicycle
nd identifies t
ies in the M
overed by the
FHWA. The
on about the
ers, response
ls (AASHTO
dance on dim
ted by AASH
detailed stri
4 Urban Bike
rds, and offer
r substantive
mands for the
gn Guide trea
A) is an impo
proposed Pu
for Accessi
tion of acces
pedestrian rai
sions of the A
und within th
pplication ma

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
(MUTCD) d
trol devices
WA MUTCD f
rnia.
e facilities tha
their official
anual on Un
e MUTCD tha
e MUTCD O
ese suppleme
e letters from
O) Guide fo
mensions, use
HTO provide
iping requirem
eway Design G
rs guidance o
guidance for
use of the rig
atments are i
ortant part o
blic Rights-of
ble Design
sible facilities
ilings along st
AASHTO Gui
hese documen
akes sense fo
OLKIT
66 efines
on all
forms
at lists
status
niform
at are
Official
entary
m the
r the
e, and
basic
ments
Guide
on the
cities
ght of
in use
of any
f-Way
(2010
s. This
tairs.
ide or
nts. In
or the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Below is a

1. FH
ht

2. M

3. ht

4. ht

5. w

5.1.2 Sta
California
This manu
California
revisions
Under ex
bikeways
specificati
cities and
Analyst’s
process is
to, utilize
adopt alte
Complete
Pedestrian
This Cali
related to
The guide
changes a
a list of the w
HWA. Bicyc
ttp://www.fhw
MUTCD Offic
ttp://nacto.or
ttp://www.acc
www.ada.gov/2
ate Standa
a Highway De
ual establishe
a Department
to address th
xisting Califo
or roadways
ons as conta
counties can
review durin
s cumbersom
e the HDM w
ernative natio
e Intersection
ns (2010)
fornia Depar
o improving c
e can be used
nd designs fo
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
websites asso
cle Facilities
wa.dot.gov/en
ial Rulings. FH
rg/cities-for-cy
cess-board.go
2010ADAstan
ards and G
esign Manual
es uniform po
t of Transpo
he Departmen
ornia law, all
where bicycl
ained in the H
n apply for a d
ng passage of
me and time-c
when designin
onal criteria, s
ns: A Guide t
rtment of T
conditions fo
d to inform m
or new interse
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ociated with t
and the M
nvironment/b
HWA. http://
ycling/designov/guidelinesndards_index
uidelines
(HDM) (20
olicies and pr
ortation. The
nt Directive 6
local agenc
le travel is pe
HDM and MU
design except
f Assembly B
consuming. In
ng local stree
such as AASH
to Reconstru
Transportation
or bicyclists a
minor signage
ections.

S STRATEG
ransportation
these standar
Manual on
ikeped/mutcd
mutcd.fhwa.d
-guide/
-and-standard
x.htm
12)
rocedures to
e 2012 editio
64 R-1.
ies responsib
ermitted must
UTCD. For b
tion from Calt
Bill 1193 in 2
n contrast, cit
ets and roads
HTO’s or NA
ucting Interse
n reference
and pedestria
e and striping

5.0 GY
Authority
rds and guide
Uniform Tra
d_bike.htm
dot.gov/orsea
ds/streets-side
carry out hi
on incorporat
ble for the
t utilize Caltr
bikeways that
trans. Howev
2014, “local g
ties and coun
s.” AB 119
ACTO’s.
ections and I
guide prese
ns at major
g changes to
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
es and their a
affic Contro
arch.asp
ewalks/public
ghway design
ted Complet
development
rans adopted
t do not mee
ver, according
governments
nties may, but
93 allows loca
Interchanges
nts informat
intersections
intersections

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
associated ma
ol Devices.
-rights-of-wa
n functions fo
te Streets fo
t or operatio
design criter
et these stand
g to the Legis
complain tha
t are not req
al governmen
for Bicyclists
tion and con
and intercha
s, as well as
OLKIT
67 anuals.
2011.
ay
or the
ocused
on of
ia and
dards,
slative
at the
quired
nts to
s and
ncepts
anges.
major

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Main Stre
This Caltr
manuals
transport
procedure
Traffic Co
www.dot.

NCHRP Le
This diges
issues. Th
on street
maintenan
and bicycl
New Legis
AB 1193,
standards
Analyst, A
does not
within the
a qualified
by a natio
City Tran
separated
provide a
protected
flexible po

5.1.3 Bic
Some of t
versions
elements
identifies
marking i
compliant
In all case
context o
eets: Flexibility
rans booklet
and policies
ation system
es descried in
ontrol Device
.ca.gov/hq/Lan
egal Digest 53
st is a useful
he document
ts and highw
nce engineers
lists on share
slation Allowi
signed into
for bikeway
AB 1193 “allo
give them co
e HDM would
d engineer, ar
onal associati
sportation O
d bikeways, al
a right-of-way
d from vehicu
osts, inflexible
cycle Facili
these bicycle
of the Califo
of these trea
the inclusion
ndicates a tr
t signs and ma
es, engineerin
of each treatm
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
y in Design &
is an informa
s that impr
m. The doc
n the Caltran
es (California
ndArch/mains
: Liability Aspe
resource fo
addresses the
ways. The re
s and all pers
d roadways.
ing Safety Sta
law on Septe
ys other tha
ows local gove
omplete contr
d have to ens
re adopted by
ion of public
Officials.” The
lso referred t
y designated
ular traffic. T
e physical bar
ity Standar
e facilities cov
ornia Highway
atments are
n of a partic
reatment may
arkings are us
ng judgment i
ment, given th
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
& Operations
ational guide
rove multim
cument will
ns Highway D
MUTCD) an
street/main_s
ects of Bikeway
or city staff c
e liability of p
port will be
sons intereste
andards Othe
ember 22, 20
an Caltrans’
ernments to
rol. Cities and
sure that the
y resolution a
agency trans
e bill also exp
to as “Class
exclusively f
ypes of sepa
rriers, or on-s
rds Compl
vered by the
y Design Ma
found within
cular treatme
y not be spe
sed.
is recommen
he many comp

S STRATEG
ransportation
(2013)
that reflects
modal access
help users
Design Manua
nd the Projec
street_3rd_e
ys (2010)
considering in
public entities
useful to at
ed in the rela
er Than Caltra
014, allows lo
Highway De
deviate from
d counties th
alternative cr
at a public m
sportation of
ands the defi
IV bikeways,
for bicycle tr
ration include
street parking
iance
se guidelines
anual or the
n these docum
ent within th
ecifically ment
nded to ensur
plexities of ur

5.0 GY
Authority
many of the
, livability a
locate infor
al (HDM), the
ct Developme
edition.pdf
nnovative eng
s for bicycle c
attorneys, tra
ative rights an
ans’ HDM: A
ocal agencies
esign Manual.
m state criteria
at elect to us
riteria have b
meeting, and a
fficials, such
nition of bike
” which prom
ravel adjacent
e, but are no
g.
are not dire
California M
ments. An “X
he national a
tioned, but is
re that the a
rban streets.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
recent updat
and sustaina
rmation abo
e California M
ent Procedur
gineering solu
collisions on b
ansportation
nd responsib
AB 1193
to adopt, by
. According
a when desig
se design crit
been reviewe
adhere to gui
as the Natio
eways to inclu
mote active t
t to a roadw
ot limited to,
ectly referenc
MUTCD, altho
X” marking in
and state des
s compliant a
application ma

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
tes to the Ca
ability within
out standards
Manual on Un
es Manual (P
utions to loc
bikeways as w
officials, plan
bilities of mot
y resolution,
to the Legis
gning bikeway
teria not cont
d and approv
delines estab
onal Associati
ude cycle trac
transportatio
way and whic
, grade separ
ced in the cu
ough many o
n Table 5.1 b
sign guides.
assuming MU
akes sense fo
OLKIT
68 altrans
n the
s and
niform
DPM)
calized
well as
nners,
torists
safety
slative
ys, but
tained
ved by
lished
ion of
cks or
n and
ch are
ration,
urrent
of the
below
A “-”
UTCD
or the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Table 5.

Signed Sh
Marked S
Bicycle Bo
Bicycle La
Buffered B
Cycle Tra
Bike Box
Bike Lane
Only Lane
Green-Co
Conflict A
Combined
Two-Stag
Intersecti
Wayfindin
Wayfindin
Bicycle Sig
Active W
Pedestrian

5.2 Bicy
There are
particular
uses, and
significant
bicyclists
vehicle tr
roadway,
vehicle tra
whether t
section pr
1: National
ared Roadwa
hared Roadw
oulevard
ane
Bicycle Lane
acks
es to the left o
es
olored Bike L
Areas
d Bike Lane/T
e Turn Queu
on Crossing
ng Sign Types
ng Sign Placem
gnal Heads
Warning Beaco
n Hybrid Bea
ycle Facility
e no ‘hard an
r location – r
expected bic
t factors influe
prefer faciliti
raffic speeds
they are pe
affic. Consiste
they would fe
rovides guida
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
and State D
ay
way
of Right Turn
Lanes in
Turn Lane
ue Boxes
Markings
s & Placement
ment
ons
cons
y Selection
nd fast’ rules
roadway spee
cycle user typ
encing bicycle
es separated
and volume
erceived as sa
ent use of tre
eel comfortab
nce on variou
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Design Guid
Cal
CA MUT
Exper
n
FHWA
Approv
Disa
At T-int
t
n
s for determi
eds, volumes,
pes are all crit
e use are mot
from motor
es. Because o
afe and attra
eatments and
ble riding on
us factors tha

S STRATEG
ransportation
des
trans
TCD (2014)
X
X
-
X
X
rimental
X
A Interim
val (IA-14)
llowed
tersections
X
X
X
X
X
X
ining the mo
, right-of-way
tical element
tor vehicle tr
vehicle traffic
off-street pat
active routes
d application o
a particular f
at affect the ty

5.0 GY
Authority
Caltra
Highway Desig
(2014)
X
-
Same as C
ost appropriat
y width, pres
s of this deci
raffic volumes
c or located
athways are
for bicyclist
of bikeway fa
facility, and p
ype of facilitie
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ans
gn Manual
)
U
Class I
te type of bi
sence of park
sion. Studies
s and speeds.
on local road
physically se
ts who prefe
cilities allow
plan their trip
es that should

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
NACTO
Urban Bikeway D
Guide (2014
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
icycle facility
king, adjacent
find that the
Additionally,
ds with low m
eparated from
er to avoid m
users to antic
s accordingly
d be provided
OLKIT
69 O
Design
4)
for a
t land
most
most
motor
m the
motor
cipate
y. This
d.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

BIKEWAY
nge County T

S STRATEG
ransportation

5.0 GY
Authority

BICYCLE FA
KOA

CILITY TOO
Corporation
KTU+A
OLKIT
70 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.2.1 Fa
Descriptio
Consisten
Guideline
Shared Ro
same trav
instances,
Class III B
other tre
calming d
with Bicyc
Class II Bi
and moto
Class IV
separated
acility Class
on
nt with bicyc
s identify the
oadways (No
vel lane, eith
streets may
Bikeways (Bik
atments inclu
evices to red
cle Boulevard
ikeways (Bike
orists. Bike lan
Bikeways (Cy
d path with th
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
sification
cle facility c
e following cl
o bikeway des
her side by s
be fully adeq
ke Routes) ar
uding directio
duce vehicle
ds.
e Lanes) use s
nes encourage
ycle Tracks)
he on-street in
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
lassifications
asses of facil
signation) are
side or in sin
uate and safe
re Shared Ro
onal signage,
speeds or vo
signage and st
e predictable
are exclusiv
nfrastructure

S STRATEG
ransportation
throughout
ities by degre
e bikeways w
ngle file depe
without bicy
adways confi
traffic divert
olumes. Such
triping to del
movements
e bike faciliti
of conventio

5.0 GY
Authority
the nation,
ee of separat
where bicyclis
ending on ro
ycle specific s
gured with p
ters, chicanes
h enhanced tr
ineate the rig
by both bicyc
ies that com
onal bike lane
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
these Bicyc
tion from mo
sts and cars o
oadway confi
igning and pa
pavement mar
s, chokers an
reatments oft
ght-of-way as
clists and mot
mbine the use
es.

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
cle Facility D
otor vehicle t
operate with
iguration. In
vement mark
rkings, signag
d /or other
ften are assoc
signed to bicy
torists.
er experience
OLKIT
71 Design
traffic.
in the
some
kings.
ge and
traffic
ciated
yclists
e of a

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Cla

5.2.2 Fa
The follo
environm
traffic stu
refine cri
ass 1 Bikeway
acility Cont
owing contin
ents, based
dies, previou
iteria when
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
s (Bike Paths)
tinua
nua illustrate
on the road
s municipal p
developing b
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
) are facilities
pe
e the range
way type an
planning effort
bicycle facilit

S STRATEG
ransportation
s separated fr
edestrians.
of bicycle
d desired de
ts, communit
ty recommen

5.0 GY
Authority
rom roadways
facilities ap
egree of sep
ty input and l
ndations for
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
s for use by b
pplicable to
paration. Engi
ocal context
a particular

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
bicyclists and
various roa
ineering judg
should be us
r street. In
OLKIT
72 adway
gment,
sed to
some

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and corridors
recomme
cases, exi
of separat
, it may be
nded in relev
sting and/or
ion, and a les
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
desirable t
vant planning
future motor
ss intensive tr
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
o construct
g documents
r vehicle spee
reatment may

S STRATEG
ransportation
facilities to
in order to
eds and volum
y be acceptab

5.0 GY
Authority
a higher le
enhance use
mes may not
ble.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
evel of treat
er safety and
t justify the re

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
tment than
comfort. In
ecommended
OLKIT
73 those
other
d level

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.3 Shar
A shared
pedestrian
motorized
frequently
greenbelt
with mot
amenities
appropria
Througho
“shared-u
interchang
bikeways,
promote,
Design M
jurisdictio
HDM’s re
vertical cl
of a para
removing
bicyclists.

Key featu
 Frequ
 Direc
 A lim
drivew
 Term
from
 Separ
use is
red-use Pa
d-use path a
ns, skaters, w
d users, as w
y found in
s or utility c
torized vehi
such as l
ate).
out the Unite
use path” a
geably. How
i.e., “all fac
bicycle trave
Manual, even
on. For this
equirements f
learance, and
allel street a
the implica
res of shared
uent access po
ctional signs to
ited number
ways.
inating the pa
the street sys
rate treads fo
expected.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
aths
llows for tw
wheelchair use
well as for bic
parks, along
orridors whe
cles. Path f
ighting, signa
d States outs
and “Class
wever, Calif
cilities that p
el”, to confor
bikeways tha
s reason, pa
for Class I pa
separation fr
are often la
ation that t
d-use paths in
oints from th
o direct users
of at-grade cr
ath where it i
stem.
r pedestrians
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
wo-way, off-s
ers, joggers a
cyclists. Thes
g rivers, bea
ere there are
facilities can
age, and fe
ide of Califor
I bike pat
fornia law
provide prim
m to the Cal
at are not un
ths that fall
avement widt
rom the edge
abeled “share
the path is
clude:
e local road n
s to and from
rossings with
s easily acces
s and bicyclist

S STRATEG
ransportation
street use fo
and other non
se facilities ar
aches, and i
e few conflict
also includ
encing (wher
rnia, the term
h” are use
requires a
marily for, an
trans Highwa
nder Caltran
short of th
ths, shoulder
e of travel wa
ed-use paths
primarily fo
network.
m the path.
streets or
ssible to and
ts when heavy

5.0 GY
Authority
or
nre
in
ts
de
re
ms
ed
all
nd
ay
s’
he
rs,
ay
”,
or
y
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA

CILITY TOO
Corporation
KTU+A
OLKIT
74 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.3.1 Ge
Description
Shared-us
preferring
not provid
Guidance
Width
• 9
fo
• 12
4-
be
Lateral C
• T
an
w
ba
se
Overhea
• T
pa
Striping
• W
ed
• So
cr
eneral Des
n
se paths can
g separation f
ded by existin
feet is the m
oot paved wid
2 feet is the m
-foot lanes an
etween railing
Clearance
The minimum
nd the edge o
width. Prior t
arrier is incl
eparation.
ad Clearanc
The minimum
ath is 8 feet, a
When striping
dge lines.
olid centerlin
rossings.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ign Practic
provide a de
from traffic. B
ng roadways.
minimum allow
dth with 2-foo
minimum allo
nd 2-foot sho
gs shall be no
separation be
of travel way
to 2012, the
uded. Since
e
vertical clear
and 7 feet ov
g is required,
nes can be pr
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ces
esirable facility
Bicycle paths
wed by the H
ot shoulders
wed by the H
oulders on ea
ot less than 10
etween the e
of a parallel
Highway De
2012, howev
rance allowed
ver shoulder.
use a 4-inch
ovided on tig

S STRATEG
ransportation
y, particularly
should gener
HDM for a on
on each side.

HDM for a tw
ch side. On
0 feet.
edge of pavem
road or stree
esign Manual
ver, a physic
d by the HDM
dashed yello
ght or blind c

5.0 GY
Authority
y for recreat
rally provide
ne-way Class
.
wo-way Class
structures, t
ment of a one
et shall be 5
allowed nar
cal barrier w
M to obstruct
ow centerline
corners, and
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
tion, and user
directional tr
I bicycle path
I bicycle path
he clear widt
-way or a tw
feet plus the
rrower separ
would not re
tions across t
e stripe with
on the appro

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
rs of all skill
ravel opportu
h consisting o
h consisting o
th of a Class
wo-way bicycle
standard sho
ration if a ph
esult in a red
the width of a
4-inch solid
oaches to roa
OLKIT
75 levels
unities
of a 5-
of two
I path
e path
oulder
hysical
duced
a bike
white
adway

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Materials
Asphalt is
more dur
Existing L
 A
 A
 A
Potential
 T
 Se
 A

5.3.2 Pa
Descriptio
Utility an
closure o
corridors
transport
Guidance
Shared-us
to the Ca
Access Po
Any acces
a shared-u
Path Clos
Public acc
• C
• In
and Maintena
s the most co
rable over the
Locations
Avenida Pico, S
Avenida Vista
Aliso Creek Bi
Locations
Trabuco Cree
ervice road in
Avenida Califo
aths in Rive
on
d waterway
pportunities.
include can
ation and rec
se paths in ut
altrans Highwa
oints
ss point to th
use path or b
sure
cess to the pa
Canal/flood co
nclement wea
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ance
ommon surfac
e long term.

San Clemente
Hermosa in S
ike Path in La
k in Rancho S
n Aliso and W
ornia in San Ju
er and Utili
corridors of
Utility corrid
nals, drainag
creation oppo
tility corridor
ay Design Ma
he path should
bicycle facility
ath may be pr
ontrol channe
ather or the p
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ce for bicycle
e (see photo
San Clemente
aguna Hills
Santa Margari
Wood Canyon
uan Capistran
ity Corrido
ften offer ex
dors typically
e ditches, r
ortunities for
rs should mee
anual if design
d be well-def
and prohibiti
rohibited duri
el or other uti
prediction of

S STRATEG
ransportation
e paths. The
on previous
e
ita
ns Wilderness
o
ors
xcellent share
include powe
rivers, and b
bicyclists of a
et or exceed
nated as a Cla
fined with app
ing motor ve
ing the follow
ility maintena
storm condit

5.0 GY
Authority
use of concr
page)
s Park, Orang
ed-use path
er line and se
beaches. The
all ages and sk
general desig
ass I bike path
propriate sign
hicles.
wing events:
ance activities
tions
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
rete for paths
ge County
development
ewer corridor
ese corridor
kills.
gn practices,
h.
nage designat
s

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
s has proven
t and bikewa
rs, while wate
rs offer exc
and must con
ting the pathw
OLKIT
76 to be
ay gap
erway
cellent
nform
way as

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora

BIKEWAY
nge County T

S STRATEG
ransportation

5.0 GY
Authority

BICYCLE FA
KOA

CILITY TOO
Corporation
KTU+A
OLKIT
77 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.3.3 Pa
Descriptio
Common
off-street
destinatio
Guidance
Shared-us
additional
In full co
crossings
to meet t
Discussion
It is often
that meet
Additiona
 AA
 C
 Fl
Materials
For paths
collection
Existing L
 Sa
Potential
 T

5.3.4 Pa
Descriptio
Rails-with
some con
preserved
way widt
crossings
aths in Aba
on
ly referred to
paths. Rail co
ons and gener
se paths in a
width allows
onversions of
are already e
he needs of a
n
n impractical
t minimum pa
l References
ASHTO. Guide
alifornia MUT
link, C. Greenw
and Mainten
that are susc
n.

Locations
an Juan Creek
Locations
TBD
aths in Acti
on
h-Trails proje
nstraints could
d for future p
th, inadequat
may affect a
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
andoned Ra
o as Rails-to-T
orridors offe
rally flat terra
abandoned r
s, wider paths
f abandoned
established. D
a rail-trail.
and costly to
ath widths, bu
and Guideline
e for the Deve
TCD. 2014.
ways. 1993.
nance
ceptible to flo
k Trail, San Ju
ive Rail Co
cts typically c
d impact the
planned freigh
te setbacks,
project’s feas
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ail Corrido
Trails or Railr several adva
in.
rail corridors
s and landsca
rail corridor
Design becom
o add materia
ut often lack p
es
lopment of Bic
ooding or pon
uan Capistran
orridors
consist of pa
feasibility of
ht, transit or
concerns ab
sibility.

S STRATEG
ransportation
rs
-Trails, these
antages, inclu
s should me
ping are desir
rs, the sub-b
mes a matter
al to existing
preferred sho
cycle Facilities.
nding, perme
no (see photo
ths adjacent
rail-with-trail
r commuter r
bout safety a

5.0 GY
Authority
projects con
uding relative
eet or excee
rable.
base, superstr
of working w
railroad bed
oulder and lat
2012.
eable pavemen
o on previous
to active rai
l projects. In
rail service. I
and trespass
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
nvert vacated
ly direct rout
ed general d
ructure, drai
with the exis
fill slopes. T
teral clearanc
nt is an optio
s page)
lroads. It sho
some cases,
n other case
sing, and num

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
rail corridor
tes between
design practic
nage, bridges
sting infrastru
This results in
ce widths.
on to reduce w
ould be noted
space needs
es, limited rig
merous midOLKIT
78 rs into
major
ces. If
s, and
ucture
trails
water
d that
to be
ght-of-
-block

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Guidance
If require
sensitive
speed and
their own
Metrolink
the cente
railroad s
barriers, v
ed, fencing sh
areas such a
d frequency
n design criter
k’s SCRRA R
erline of the
speed is betw
vertical separ
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
hould be a m
as switching y
of trains, and
ria regarding
Rail-with-Trail
nearest track
ween 90 mp
ration or othe
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
minimum of 5
yards. Setbac
d available ri
separation fr
Design Guid
k. For examp
ph and 79 m
er methods sh

S STRATEG
ransportation
5 feet in heig
cks from the
ight-of-way.
om bikeways
delines provi
ple, the setba
ph. Where t
hall be emplo

5.0 GY
Authority
ght with high
active rail li
Furthermore
s.
ide recomme
ack should b
these setbac
oyed.”
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
her fencing t
ne will vary
e, the railroa
ended minim
e 40 feet wh
ks cannot be

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
than usual ne
depending o
ad operators
um setbacks
here the mai
e met, “addi
OLKIT
79 ext to
on the
s have
from
n line
itional

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussio
Railroads
can vary w
whether t
Additiona
 AA
 C
 FH
 M
Materials
For paths
collection
Existing L
 Sa
 A
Potential
 LO
n
typically requ
with the amo
the section of
l References
ASHTO. Guide
alifornia MUT
HWA. Rails-wi
Metrolink SCRR
and Mainten
that are susc
n.

Locations
an Clemente
Aliso Creek Bi
Locations
OSSAN Corr
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
uire fencing w
ount of train t
f track is in an
and Guideline
e for the Deve
TCD. 2014.
ith-Trails: Lesso
RA Rails-with-T
nance
ceptible to flo
Beach Trail (
ike Path, Lake
ridor in Missio
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
with all rail-w
traffic on the
n urban or ru
es
lopment of Bic
ons Learned. 2
Trails Design G
ooding or pon
(see photo ab
e Forest
on Viejo, Lag

S STRATEG
ransportation
with-trail proje
e adjacent rail
ural setting.
cycle Facilities.
2002.

Guidelines, 201
nding, perme
bove)
una Niguel, a

5.0 GY
Authority
ects. Concern
l line and the
2012.
0 eable pavemen
and Lake Fore
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ns with trespa
e setting of th
nt is an optio
est

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
assing and se
he bicycle pat
on to reduce w
OLKIT
80 curity
th, i.e.
water

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.3.5 Lo
Descriptio
Neighbor
trails, gre
and from
Additiona
dead-end
Guidance
• N
• T
ve
• T
m
• A
ocal Neighb
on
rhood accessw
en spaces, an
the larger tra
ally, these sm
streets, cul-d
Neighborhood
Trail pavemen
ehicles, meet
Trail widths sh
mature native
Access trails sh
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
borhood A
ways provide
nd other rec
ail network, t
maller trails ca
de-sacs, and a
d access shou
nt shall be a
ADA require
hould be desig
trees over 18
hould slightly
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Accessways
residential a
reational are
typically havin
an be used t
access to near
ld remain ope
t least 8 fee
ements and b
gned to be le
8 inches in ca
y meander wh

S STRATEG
ransportation
areas with dir
as. They mo
ng their own r
to provide bi
rby destinatio
en to the pub
et wide to a
be considered
ess than 8 feet
aliper, wetland
henever possi

5.0 GY
Authority
rect bicycle a
st often serv
rights-of-way
icycle and pe
ons not provi
blic
accommodate
d suitable for
t wide only w
ds or other e
ible
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
and pedestria
ve as small tr
y and easemen
edestrian con
ded by the st
e emergency
multi-use
when necessa
ecologically se

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
an access to p
rail connectio
nts.
nnections bet
treet network
and mainte
ry to protect
ensitive areas
OLKIT
81 parks,
ons to
tween
k.
nance
t large
.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Neighbor
required b
Additiona
 AA
Materials
For paths
collection
Existing L
 H
 A
Potential
 C
 N
n
rhood access
by City/Coun
l References
ASHTO. Guide
and Mainten
that are susc
n.

Locations
Horno Creek
Aliso Creek Bi
Locations
Cul-de-sac con
Neighborhood
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
should be d
nty subdivision
and Guideline
e for the Deve
nance
ceptible to flo
Road to Mar
ike Path at C
nnections
d easements
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
designed into
n regulations.
es
lopment of Bic
ooding or pon
bella Vista Ro
larington Dr.

S STRATEG
ransportation
o new subdiv
.
cycle Facilities.
nding, perme
oad, San Juan
, Laguna Hills

5.0 GY
Authority
visions at eve
2012.
eable pavemen
Capistrano (
s
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ery opportun
nt is an optio
(see photo ab

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
nity and shou
on to reduce w
bove)
OLKIT
82 uld be
water

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.4 Path
At-grade
between
crossings
higher de
evidenced
United St
path cros
degree o
standards
additional
bicyclists

5.4.1 Ma
Descriptio
A marked
crossing a
The appr
depends
pathway
width, an
attraction
When spa
and bicycl
Guidance
Maximum
• <
• U
• U
Maximum
Minimum
• 25
• 35
• 45
h/Roadway
roadway c
path users
can mitigate
egree of safe
d by the tho
tates with at
sings can be
of safety an
. Path facilit
consideratio
versus pedes
arked/Unsi
on
d/unsignalized
area, signage,
roach to de
on an evalu
traffic, use p
nd other saf
ns.
ace is availab
lists space to
m traffic volum
9,000-12,000
Up to 15,000 A
Up to 12,000 A
m travel speed
line of sight
5 MPH zone:
5 MPH zone:
5 MPH zone:

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
y Crossing
crossings can
and motor
e many oper
ety and com
ousands of su
t-grade cross
properly des
d can meet
ties that cat
ons due to
trians.
ignalized C
d crossing ty
and other m
esigning cros
uation of ve
patterns, veh
fety issues s
le, using a m
perform the
mes
0 Average Da
ADT on twoADT on four
d: 35 MPH
155 feet
250 feet
360 feet
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
n create po
rists; howeve
rational issue
mfort for pat
uccessful faci
sings. In mos
igned to prov
t existing tr
ter to bicycl
the higher
Crossings
ypically consi
arkings to slo
sings at mid
ehicular traffi
hicle speed,
such as pro
edian refuge
safe crossing
aily Traffic (A
-lane roads, p
-lane roads w

S STRATEG
ransportation
otential con
er, well-desig
es and provid
th users. Th
lities around
st cases, at-g
vide a reason
raffic and sa
lists can req
travel speed
ists of a ma
ow or stop tr
d-block locat
ic, line of s
road type,
ximity to m
island can im
g of one side o
DT) volume
preferably wit
with median

5.0 GY
Authority
flicts
gned
de a
his is
d the
grade
nable
afety
quire
d of
arked
raffic.
tions
sight,
road
major
mprove user
of the street
th a median
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
safety by pro
at a time.

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
oviding pedes
OLKIT
83 strians

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Unsignaliz
sufficient
rectangula
Additiona
 AA
 C
Existing L
 Sh
 A
 Pa

5.4.2 Sig
Descriptio
Path cros
crosswalk
located so
needed to
modificati
Guidance
Path cro
intersectio
n
zed crossings
crossing gap
ar rapid flash
al References
ASHTO. Guide
alifornia MUT
Location for P
hady Canyon
Aliso Creek Bi
acific Coast H
gnalized C
on
ssings within
ks are typicall
o close to an
o direct path
ions should b
ssings should
on. If possible
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
s of multi-lan
ps (more than
beacons.
and Guidelin
e for the Deve
TCD. 2014
otential Impr
Drive, Irvine
ike Path at Lo
Highway Con
rossings
approximate
y diverted to
n existing sig
h users to th
e made.
d not be p
e, route path
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
e arterials ov
n 60 per ho
es
lopment of Bic
rovement
e (see photo a
os Alisos Blvd
nector at Co
ely 400 feet
o the signalize
gnal. For this
he signalized
rovided with
directly to th

S STRATEG
ransportation
ver 15,000 A
ur), median
cycle Facilities.
above)
d, Lake Forest
ast Hwy, Dan
of an exist
ed intersectio
restriction t
crossing. If n
hin approxim
he signal.

5.0 GY
Authority
ADT may be
refuges, and/
2012
t
na Point
ting signalized
on to avoid tr
to be effectiv
no pedestria
mately 400 f
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
possible wit
/or active wa
d intersectio
raffic operatio
ve, barriers a
n crossing ex
feet of an

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
h features su
arning device
n with pede
on problems
and signing m
xists at the s
existing sign
OLKIT
84 uch as
es like
estrian
when
may be
signal,
nalized

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
In the US
from app
taken into
Additiona
 AA
 AA
Materials
If a sidewa
Existing L
 La
 A
 T
Potential
 A
 Sa

5.4.3 Ov
Descriptio
Bicycle/pe
by barrier
structures
Grade-sep
where AD
n
, the minimum
roximately 2
o account wh
l References
ASHTO. Guide
ASHTO. Guide
and Mainten
alk is used fo
Locations
aguna Hills D
Aliso Creek Bi
Trabuco Side P
Locations
Avenida Empre
alt Creek Bik
vercrossing
on
edestrian ove
rs such as de
s are built in
parated cros
DT exceeds 2
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
m distance a
50 to 660 fe
en choosing t
and Guideline
e for the Deve
e for the Plann
nance
r crossing acc
Drive at Paseo
ike Path at Al
Path at Trabu
esa at Santa M
ke Path at Ritz
gs
ercrossings pr
eep canyons,
response to u
sings may be
25,000 vehicle
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
marked cross
eet. Engineeri
the appropria
es
lopment of Bic
ning, Design, an
cess, it should
o de Valencia,
licia Pkwy, La
uco Rd and El
Margarita Pkw
z Carlton Dr.
rovide critica
waterways o
user demand
e needed wh
es, and where

S STRATEG
ransportation
sing can be fr
ng judgment
ate allowable
cycle Facilities.
nd Operation
d meet ADA
Laguna Hills
aguna Hills
Toro Rd, La
wy, Rancho Sa
. and Pacific C
al non-motori
or major tran
for safe cros
here existing
e 85th percent

5.0 GY
Authority
rom an existin
and the con
setback.
2012
of Pedestrian F
guidelines.
(see photo a
ake Forest
anta Margarit
Coast Hwy, D
ized system l
nsportation c
ssings where t
bicycle/pede
tile speeds ex
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ng signalized
ntext of the l
Facilities. 2004
above)
ta
Dana Point
links by joinin
corridors. In
they previous
estrian cross
xceed 45 mile

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
intersection v
location shou
4 ng areas sepa
most cases,
sly did not ex
ings do not
es per hour.

OLKIT
85 varies
uld be
arated
these
xist.
exist,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Guidance
• 10
ad
m
• 10
• V



0-foot minim
dditional widt
may be provid
0-foot headro
Vertical cleara
 Roadway:
 Freeway: 1
 Heavy Rail
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
um width bet
th should be
ed for facilitie
oom on overc
nce below w
17 feet

18.5 feet
l Line: 23 feet
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
tween railing
e provided to
es with high b
crossing
ill vary depen
t

S STRATEG
ransportation
s, 14 feet pre
o allow for st
bicycle and pe
nding on featu

5.0 GY
Authority
eferred. If ove
topping. A se
edestrian use
ure being cros
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ercrossing ha
eparate 5-foo
.
ssed:

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
as any scenic
ot pedestrian
OLKIT
86 vistas
n area

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Overcros
(ADA), w
the Califo
foot inter
Additiona
 AA
 AA
Materials
Potential
Existing L
San Juan C
Bicycle-Pe
Pedestrian
Possible L
San Juan C
n
ssings for bic
which strictly
ornia Code o
rvals.
l References
ASHTO. Guide
ASHTO. Guide
and Mainten
issues with va
Locations
Creek Bicycle
edestrian Brid
n Overpass at
Locations
Creek near T
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
cycles and p
limits ramp s
of Regulations
and Guideline
e for the Deve
e for the Plann
nance
andalism
e-Pedestrian B
dge over I-5, S
t Paseo De C
Trabuco Cree
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
edestrians ty
slopes of 8.33
s requires gra
es
lopment of Bic
ning, Design, an
Bridge, San Ju
San Clemente
Cristobal and
k confluence

S STRATEG
ransportation
ypically fall u
3% (1:12) wit
adients up to
cycle Facilities.
nd Operation
uan Capistran
e (see photo
Esplanade, Sa
in San Juan C

5.0 GY
Authority
under the Am
th 5-foot land
o 5% (1:20) t
2012.
of Pedestrian F
o (see photo
above)
an Clemente
Capistrano
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
mericans wit
dings every 3
to have 5-foo
Facilities. 2004
o on previous

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
th Disabilitie
30 feet. Title
ot landings at

4. page)
OLKIT
87 s Act
24 of
t 400-

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.5 Sepa
Designate
striping (C
Tracks). S
volumes a

5.5.1 Bic
Descriptio
This facilit
on a stree
there is s
needs tha
parking, b
the traffic
traffic.

Many bicy
comfortab
bikeway t
Guidance
Provide 5
parking an
• P
no
fe
• 14
(1
• 7-
hi
ve
• W
la
bi
arated Bike
ed exclusively
Class II), or p
Separated bik
and speeds w
cycle Lane
on
ty provides a
et or highway
significant bicy
at can be se
bicycle lanes
c lanes and us
yclists, partic
ble riding on
than if they ar
5-foot minimu
nd traffic lane
rovide 4-foot
ormal 2-foot
eet.

4.5-foot prefe
12-foot minim
-foot maximu
igh travel spe
ehicle use of
When approac
anes, the bike
ike lane to th
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
eways
y for bicycle t
physical measu
keways are m
warrant greate
e
an exclusive l
y, installed alo
ycle demand,
erved by them
are located
sed in the sa
cularly less e
a busy stree
re expected t
um width for
es. Six feet is d
t minimum w
gutter, minim
erred from c
mum).
um width for
eeds. Greater
bike lane.
ching an inter
lane should b
he left of the r
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
travel, separat
ures such as
most appropria
er separation.
ane for oneong streets in
, and where
m. On stree
between the
me direction
experienced
et if it has a s
o share a lane
bicycle lanes
desired.
width if no gut
mum bicycle
curb face to
r use adjacent
r widths may
rsection with
be transitione
right turn onl

S STRATEG
ransportation
ted bikeways
parking, bolla
ate on arteria

way bicycle t
n corridors w
there are dis
ets with on-s
parking area
as motor ve
riders, are m
striped and s
e with vehicle
s located betw
tter exists. W
lane width i
edge of bike
t to arterials
encourage m
right turn on
ed to a throu
ly lane.

5.0 GY
Authority
s are segregat
ards, raised is
al and collect
travel
where
stinct
street
a and
ehicle
more
igned
es.
ween
With a
s five
lane.
with
motor
nly
ugh
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ted from veh
slands, or cur
tor streets w

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
icle travel lan
rbs (Class IV
where higher
OLKIT
88 nes by
Cycle
traffic

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Wider bi
such as o
of a wid
between
Buffered
desired.

Additional
 A
Fa
 C
 N
 C
Materials a
Paint can
Existing Lo
• O
• N
Potential L
• G
• C
cycle lanes a
on higher spee
der bicycle
passing ve
Bicycle Lan
References an
AASHTO Guid
acilities, 2012
California MUT
NACTO Urba
Caltrans Califo
and Maintena
wear more q
ocations
Oso Pkwy, Ali
Niguel Rd, Lag
Locations
Golden Lanter
Crown Valley
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
are desirable
ed arterials (
lane would
hicles and
nes when fu
nd Guidelines
de for the De
2 TCD, 2014
an Bikeway D
ornia HDM, 2
nce
quickly in high
so Viejo
guna Niguel
rn Street, Dan
Pkwy, Dana P
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
in certain s
(45 mph+) w
increase se
bicyclists. C
urther separ
evelopment o
esign Guide,
2012
h traffic areas.
na Point (see
Point

S STRATEG
ransportation
situations
here use
eparation
Consider
ration is
of Bicycle
2012
.
photo above

5.0 GY
Authority
e)
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA

CILITY TOO
Corporation
KTU+A
OLKIT
89 7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.5.2 Bic
Description
The back
better vis
find their
median is
Guidance
Based on
inner bicy
Discussion
Test the
Additiona
Additiona
• C
Existing L
 N
Potential
 T
cycle Lane
n
k-in/head-out
ibility when l
views blocke
lands helps pr
existing dime
ycle lane strip
n
facility on st
al signs to dire
l References
City of Los An
Locations
None
Locations
TBD
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
es and Diag
parking is c
eaving. This i
ed by large ve
revent motor
ensions from
pe and a five fo
treets with e
ect vehicle dr
and Guideline
ngeles Bicycle
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
gonal Parki
onsidered sa
s particularly
ehicles or tint
rists from usi
test sites and
oot bicycle la
existing headriver in how t
es
Plan Update,

S STRATEG
ransportation
ng
afer than con
important o
ted windows
ng a back-in s
d permanent
ane.
-in angled pa
the back-in an
, City of Los

5.0 GY
Authority
nventional he
n busy street
in adjacent ve
stall for headfacilities, pro
arking and m
ngled parking
Angeles
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ead-in/back-o
ts or where v
ehicles. The
-in parking
ovide 16 feet
oderate to h
works is rec

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
ut parking d
vehicle driver
presence of
from curb ed
high bicycle t
commended.

OLKIT
90 ue to
rs may
raised
dge to
traffic.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.5.3 Bu
Descriptio
Buffered
with a buf
lane." B
preferent
Conventio
However,
speed an
innovative
lane and
indicated
The NAC
 P
 P
m
 En
th
 P
be
 A
 A
ne
There are

1. Pa

2. T

3. C
Parking si
Parking o
(1) reduce
of the gut
approachi
uffered Bicy
on
Bike Lanes as
ffered space s
Buffered bike
ial lanes (sect
onal bike lan
, many bicyc
d/or higher
e bicycle facil
nearly nine i
they would g
CTO Urban B
roviding a "sh
roviding spac
motor vehicle
ncouraging bi
he bike lane.
roviding a gre
e mistake for
Appealing to a
And encouragi
etwork.
e three types
arking side or
Travel lane sid
Combined side
de or curb bu
r curb side bu
es the potent
tter pan as pa
ing on side st
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ycle Lane
s defined in t
separating the
e lanes are
tion 3D-01).
es typically p
lists are unco
volume roa
ities," shows
in ten bicycli
go out of thei
Bikeway Desig
hy" distance b
e for bicyclist
travel lane.
icyclists to rid
eater space fo
r a travel lane
a wider crossing bicycling b
of buffers:
r curb buffer
de buffer
e or double b
uffer:
uffers provide
tial for a bicyc
art of the bike
treets or drive
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
the Urban Bik
e bike lane fro
allowed as
provide a 5 t
omfortable r
dways. A re
that bicyclist
sts prefer bu
r way to ride
gn guides list s
between moto
ts to pass ano
de outside of
or bicycling w
or a parking
-section of bic
by contributin
buffer
e space betwe
clist to strike
e lane, and (3)
eways.

S STRATEG
ransportation
keway Design
om the adjace
per Californ
to 6-foot wid
riding this clo
ecent study
ts feel a lowe
uffered lanes
e on a buffere
several advan
or vehicles an
other bicyclist
the door zon
without makin
lane.
cyclist users.
ng to the perc
een the bicyc
a car door b
) moves the b

5.0 GY
Authority
n Guide are "
ent motor ve
nia 2014 MU
de space betw
ose to movin
from Portlan
er risk of bei
to standard
ed bike lane o
ntages of buffe
nd bicyclists.
t without enc
ne when buffe
ng the bike lan
ception of saf
clist and parke
being opened
bicyclist out o
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
"conventiona
ehicle travel la
UTCD guidel
ween the cur
ng traffic part
nd State titl
ing "doored"
lanes. Seve
over a standar
ered lanes inc
croaching into
er is between
ne appear so
fety among u
ed cars or the
by a driver, (
of the blind sp

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
al bike lanes p
ane and/or pa
lines for buf
rb and travel
ticularly on h
led "Evaluatio
in a buffered
en in ten bicy
rd lane.
cluding:
o the adjacen
n parked cars
wide that it m
sers of the bi
e gutter pan.
(2) eliminates
pots of moto
OLKIT
91 paired
arking
ffered
l lane.
higher
on of
d bike
yclists
nt
s and
might
icycle
This
use
orists

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The limita
makes bic
pan as par
Travel sid
Travel sid
high volum
shown tha
below sho
Combine
The comb
zone whil
ation to the p
cyclists feel m
rt of the bike
de buffer:
de buffers pro
me roadways
at a simple bu
ows side trav
ed side or do
bined side or
e providing a
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
parking side o
more comforta
lane.

Travel
ovide space be
make many b
uffer substant
el side buffer
ouble sided
double sided
a perceived sa
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
or curb side b
able, but they
side (left) an
etween the b
bicyclists unco
tially increase
on PCH in D
buffer:
d buffer offers
afer distance b

S STRATEG
ransportation
uffer is that t
y do reduce t
d parking side
icyclist and m
omfortable. R
s the level of
Dana Point.
s advantage of
between the

5.0 GY
Authority
they do not p
the risk of do
e (right) buffe
motor vehicle
Recent studie
f comfort for
f guiding the
bicyclist and
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
provide the "s
oring and the
ers
s in the trave
es from the Po
most bicyclis
bicyclists awa
motor vehicl

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
shy space" tha
e use of the g
el lane. High s
ortland State
sts. The exam
ay from the d
les.

OLKIT
92 at
gutter
speed,
have
mple
door

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Guidance
According
treatment
guidance i
• B
• T
o
• T
3 (t
th
• B
Discussion
• A
• O
• A
Additiona
• N
• Po
bi
• C
Materials
Paint can
Existing L
• Pa
Potential
• Pa
• A
g to Californ
ts. Signage a
is included in
ike lane word
The buffer sha
r wider.

The buffer sha
D.01) are suc
these are the
hat the inside
uffers should
n
Add diagonal s
On-street park
A travel lane m
l References
NACTO Urba
ortland State
icycle facilitie
California MUT
and Mainten
wear more q
Locations
acific Coast H
Locations
acific Coast H
Antonio Parkw
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
nia MUTCD
and dimensio
the NACTO
d and/or symb
all have interi
all be marked
ch that for a
e same standa
line be dashe
be at least 24
striping on the
king remains
may need to b
and Guideline
an Bikeway D
e University,
s.

TCD 2014 Ed
nance
quickly in high
Highway, Dan
Hwy, Laguna B
way, Ladera R
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
2014 - Secti
nal guidelines
O Urban Bikew
bol shall be u
ior diagonal c
with 2 white
bicyclist to be
ards applied
ed instead of
4inches wide
e outer buffe
adjacent to th
be eliminated
es
esign Guide,
Center for
dition
h traffic areas.
na Point
Beach (see ph
Ranch & Ranch

S STRATEG
ransportation
ion 3D Buffe
s are the sam
way Design G
sed (MUTCD
cross hatchin
e lines. The
e allowed to
to buffered H
solid.
.
r adjacent to
he curb.
or narrowed
2014
Transportatio
.
hoto on prev
ho Santa Mar

5.0 GY
Authority
ered bike lan
me as for Cla
Guide.

D Figure 9C-3
g or chevron
California MU
cross a doub
HOV Lanes).
the traffic lan
d to accommo
on Studies (
vious page)
rgarita
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
nes are cons
ass 2 bicycle
3).
n markings if
UTCD 2104
ble white line
. Thus it is r
nes.
odate buffers
2011) Evalua

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
idered "allow
lanes. Addi
it is 3 feet in
standards (Se
it must be d
recommended
s.
ation of inno
OLKIT
93 wable"
itional
n with
ection
ashed
d that
vative

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.5.4 Cy
Description
Cycle tra
facility tha
conventio
sidewalk.
physical b
Cycle tra
share co
space that
primarily
separated
parking la
tracks ma
sidewalk
between
separate
pedestrian
Over the
relatively
the stree
businesse
for Transp
Separated
• D
in
• D
Guidance
Cycle tra
access po
One-Way
• N
co
ycle Track
n
cks, which w
at combines
onal bike lane
These differ
barrier.
acks have diff
ommon elem
t is intended
used by
d from motor
anes, and side
ay be at the l
or set at an
the roadwa
the cycle
n area.
past five yea
new type of
et, increasing
s (Lessons fr
portation and
d bikeways ca
Defining road
nto the bicycl
Discouraging b
cks should id
ints for moto
Cycle Tracks
NACTO Guid
onstrained lo
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
or Class IV
were recently
the user exp
e. A cycle tra
from buffere
ferent forms
ments they
to be exclus
bicycles, an
r vehicle trave
ewalks. Raise
level of the a
n intermediat
ay and sidew
track fro
ars more tha
facility has be
safety for b
rom the Gree
d Communitie
n increase sa
space for bic
ists’ path.
bicyclists from
deally be plac
or vehicles.
delines recom
ocations. No
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
V Bike Faci
y designated a
perience of a
ack is physica
ed lanes in th
but all
provide
ively or
nd are
el lanes,
ed cycle
adjacent
te level
walk to
m the
n 100 new s
een shown to
bicyclists, ped
en Lanes: Eva
es, 2014).
fety and prom
yclists and m
m riding on th
ced along str
mmend a 7-fo
ote: In accor

S STRATEG
ransportation
ilities
as Class IV f
a separated p
ally separated
hat the bicyc
eparated bike
o be effective
destrians and
luating Protec
mote proper
otorists, redu
he sidewalk.
reets with lo
oot minimum
rdance with

5.0 GY
Authority
facilities in C
path with the
d from moto
clist is separa
e facilities ha
e in increasing
d motorists a
cted Bike Lan
riding by:
ucing the pos
ong blocks an
to allow pas
AB 1193, sig
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
California, are
e on-street i
or traffic and
ated from the
ave been adde
g the number
and increasin
nes in the US,
ssibility that m
nd few drivew
ssing. 5-foot
gned in 2014

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
e an exclusive
infrastructure
d distinct from
e travel lanes
ed in the US
r of bicyclists
ng access to
, National Ins
motorists will
ways or midminimum wid
4, the local a
OLKIT
94 e bike
e of a
m the
s by a
S. This
using
local
stitute
l stray
-block
dth in
agency

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and m
M
• O
tr
tr
Two-Way
• C
w
• 12
N
ad
tr
must pass a r
Manual if the o
One way cycle
raffic) or con
raffic on a one
Cycle Tracks
Cycle tracks lo
way streets.
2-foot recom
Note: In acco
dopt NACTO
rack width is
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
resolution to
one-way cycle
e tracks can b
ntra-flow (op
e-way street)
ocated on on
mmended min
ordance with
O Guidelines
less than 12 f
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
adopt NAC
e track width
be either conv
posite direct
).
ne-way street
nimum for tw
AB 1193, sig
in lieu of the
feet.

S STRATEG
ransportation
TO Guidelin
is less than 9
ventional flow
tion of adjace
ts have fewer
wo-way facility
gned in 2014,
e Caltrans H

5.0 GY
Authority
nes in lieu of
9 feet.
w (i.e., go the
ent traffic flo
r potential co
y. 8-foot min
, the local ag
ighway Desig
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
f the Caltran
e same directi
ow, such as t
onflict areas th
nimum in con
gency must pa
gn Manual if t

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
s Highway D
ion as the adj
to the left si
han those on
nstrained loca
ass a resoluti
the two-way
OLKIT
95 Design
jacent
ide of
n twoations.
ion to
cycle

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Special co
Driveway
prohibited
Additional
• N
• Le
T
Materials a
Dependin
sweeping.

Existing Lo
• PC
Potential L
• El

5.6 Sepa
Designs f
between
heightenin
facilitating
Intersecti
for bicycl
The config
such as c
Intersecti
bicyclist,
separation
risk of c
required f
type used
street fun
onsideration
ys and minor
d within 30 fe
References an
NACTO. Urba
essons from t
Transportation
and Maintena
ng upon the w
.
ocations
CH in Dana P
Locations
l Camino Rea
arated Bike
for intersect
bicyclists (an
ng the leve
g eye contact
on treatment
ists, and are
guration of a
olor, signage,
on design sho
pedestrian, a
n between bi
rashes and i
for bicyclists
d, whether b
nction and lan
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
should be gi
street cross
eet of the inte
nd Guidelines
an Bikeway D
the Green La
n and Commu
nce
width, barrier
Point just nor
al, San Cleme
eways at In
tions with bi
nd other vu
el of visibilit
and awarene
ts can improv
often coordi
safe intersec
, medians, sig
ould take into
and motorist
icyclists and o
ncrease bicy
at an interse
bicycle facilit
d use.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ven at trans
sings are uniq
ersection to i
Design Guide.
anes: Evaluatin
unities, 2014
-separated an
rth of San Cle
nte
ntersection
icycle facilitie
ulnerable roa
ty, denoting
ess with other
ve both queui
nated with ti
ction for bicyc
gnal detection
o considerati
movements.
other modes
yclist comfort
ection will de
ies are inter

S STRATEG
ransportation
it stops to m
que challenge
mprove visib
2014.
ng Protected
nd raised cycl
emente
ns
es should re
ad users) and
clear right
r modes.
ing and mergi
imed or spec
clists may inc
n, and pavem
on existing a
The degree
is intended
t. The level
pend on the
rsecting, and

5.0 GY
Authority
manage bicyc
es to cycle tr
bility.

Bike Lanes in
le tracks may
educe conflic
d vehicles b
t-of-way, an
ing maneuver
cialized signals
clude element
ment markings
and anticipate
e of mixing o
to reduce th
of treatmen
bicycle facilit
the adjacen
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
cle and pedes
rack design.
n the US, Nat
y require sma
ct
by
d
rs
s.
ts
s.
ed
or
he
nt
ty
nt

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
strian interac
Parking shou
tional Institut
aller equipme
OLKIT
96 ctions.
uld be
te for
nt for

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.6.1 Bik
Descriptio
A bike bo
provides b
signal pha
Guidance
• 14
• A
th
• A
th
• A
la
• A
• A
cl
• R
Discussion
Bike boxe
large volum
Additiona
• N
• FH
ke Box
on
ox is a desig
bicyclists with
ase. Motor ve
4’ minimum d
A “No Turn o
he Bike Box.

A “Stop Here
he stop line.

A “Yield to Bik
ane to reinfor
An ingress lane
A supplement
larity to moto
Requires perm
n
s should be pl
me of bicyclist
l References
NACTO. Urba
HWA. Interim
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
gnated area lo
h a safe and v
hicles must q
depth
on Red” (MUT
on Red” sign
kes” sign sho
rce that bicyc
e should be u
al “Wait He
orists.
mission to exp
laced only at s
ts and are best
and Guideline
an Bikeway D
m Approval (
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ocated at the
visible space t
queue behind
TCD R10-11)
n should be p
ould be post-m
lists have the
used to provid
re” legend ca
periment from
signalized inter
t utilized in cen
es
Design Guide.

IA-14). 2011

S STRATEG
ransportation
e head of a t
to get in front
the white sto
) sign shall be
post mounted
mounted in a
right-of-way
de access to t
an be provid
m the Federal
rsections. Bike
ntral areas wh
2014

5.0 GY
Authority
traffic lane a
t of queuing m
op line at the
e installed to
d at the stop
advance of an
y going throug
the box.
ded in advanc
l Highways Ad
e boxes should
ere traffic is u
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
at a signalized
motorized tra
rear of the b
prevent vehi
line to reinfo
d in conjunct
gh the interse
ce of the sto
dministration
d be used in lo
sually moving

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
d intersection
affic during th
bike box.
icles from ent
orce observan
tion with an e
ection.
op bar to inc
n.
ocations that h
more slowly.

OLKIT
97 n that
he red
tering
nce of
egress
crease
have a

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Materials
Because t
a high prio
Existing L
• N
Potential
• T

5.6.2 Bik
Descriptio
Class II bi
would acc
that moto
Guidance
At right tu
• C
• U
• C
and Mainten
the effectiven
ority.

Locations
None
Locations
TBD
ke Lanes a
on
ike lanes may
cess the bike
orists should y
urn only lane
Continue exist
Use signage to
Consider using
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
nance
ess of markin
at Right Tu
y be placed be
lane pocket
yield to bicyc
s:
ting bike lane
o indicate that
g colored con
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ngs depends e
rn Only La
etween the r
through a we
clists through
width; stand
t motorists sh
nflict areas to

S STRATEG
ransportation
entirely on th
anes
right-turn lane
eave zone, w
the conflict a
ard width of
hould yield to
o promote vis

5.0 GY
Authority
heir visibility,
e and the righ
with signage o
area.
5 feet or 4 fe
o bicyclists th
sibility of the
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
maintaining m
ht-most thro
or pavement m
eet in constra
rough the co
mixing zone.

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
markings shou
ugh lane. Bicy
markings indi
ained location
onflict area.

OLKIT
98 uld be
yclists
cating
ns.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Additiona
• A
• C
• N
• C
• C
Materials
Because t
a high prio
Existing L
• Pa
• Pa

5.6.3 Co
Descriptio
The Fede
use of gr
intersectio
l References
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
NACTO. Urba
Caltrans. Califo
Caltrans. Com
and Mainten
the effectiven
ority.

Locations
acific Coast H
acific Coast H
olored Bike
on
ral Highway
reen colored
ons and othe
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
and Guideline
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
an Bikeway D
ornia HDM. 2
mplete Interse
nance
ess of markin
Highway at Ca
Hwy at Crow
e Lanes in
Administratio
pavement in
er traffic con
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
es
evelopment o
Design Guide.
2012.
ections. 2010.
ngs depends e
amino Capist
wn Valley Pkwy
Conflict A
on (FHWA) h
n marked bic
nflict areas. It

S STRATEG
ransportation
of Bicycle Fac
2014.
entirely on th
trano, San Cle
y, Dana Point
reas
has granted t
cycle lanes a
t should be n

5.0 GY
Authority
cilities. 2012.
heir visibility,
emente (see p
t
the State of C
and in exten
noted that th
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
maintaining m
photo on pre
California app
sions of bicy
he green col

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
markings shou
evious page)
proval for op
ycle lanes th
ored paveme
OLKIT
99 uld be
ptional
rough
ent as

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and described
exclusivel
same patc
different
pavement
uncolored
zone show
Discussion
The best
green colo
used by s
paint, wh
every driv
conflict zo
discretion
It should
pavement
approved
experime
Additiona
• A
• C
• N
• C
• C
d under this
y used for b
ch of pavem
philosophies
t only for C
d. Other age
wn in the figu
n
practices for
ored paveme
such agencies
ile others us
veway, alley,
ones that me
n of the local
be noted th
t, as is used o
for new
ntation the u
l References
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
NACTO. Urba
Caltrans. Califo
Caltrans. Com
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
approval is
icyclists and
ent and shou
on the usag
lass II lanes
ncies use the
ure below.
r green colo
ent for conflic
s varies dram
e a pattern o
and cross st
rit special att
agencies.
hat the comb
on Second St
experimenta
se of green c
and Guideline
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
an Bikeway D
ornia HDM. 2
mplete Interse
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
used for tw
second, to a
uld beware o
ge of green
where bicyc
e green color
red pavemen
ct zones than
matically. Som
of green strip
treets, while
tention. The p
bination of a
treet in the B
ation by the
olored pavem
es
evelopment o
Design Guide.
2012.
ections. 2010.

S STRATEG
ransportation
wo different
advise motor
of each othe
colored pav
clists have ex
red pavemen
nt are still ev
for exclusive
e agencies fil
pes. Some ag
others reser
precise design
shared lane
Belmont Shor
e FHWA.
ment as a “bac
of Bicycle Fac
2014.

5.0 GY
Authority
situations: fi
ists and bicyc
er’s presence
vement. Som
xclusive use,
t only in con
volving. As o
e bicyclist lan
ll the entire
gencies use g
rve the use o
n of green co
marking (“sh
res communi
However, t
ckground con
cilities. 2012.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
irst, to deno
clists that th
e. Local agenc
e agencies u
, and leave t
nflict zones, s
of this date, m
nes. The amo
conflict zone
green colored
of green colo
olored pavem
harrow”) wit
ity of Long B
the FHWA
nspicuity enha

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
ote a lane th
ey are sharin
cies have ado
use green co
the conflict
such as the w
more agencie
ount of green
es with solid
d pavement a
ored pavemen
ment remains a
thin green co
Beach, is no l
may accept
ancement”.

OLKIT
100
hat is
ng the
opted
olored
zones
weave
es use
n paint
green
across
nt for
at the
olored
onger
t for

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Existing L
• N
Potential
• Pa
• La

5.6.4 Co
Description
The comb
right turn
This treat
This treat
through b
Guidance
The FHW
typical ins
Maximum
• B
• A
w
• A
th
Locations
None
Locations
acific Coast H
ake Forest D
ombined B
n
bined bicycle/
n lane. A dot
tment include
tment has be
bike lane and
WA has disallo
stallations we
m shared turn
ike Lane pock
A dotted 4 in
within the com
A “Right Turn
hrough bicycl
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Hwy at Crow
r. at Jeronimo
ike Lane /
/right turn la
tted line delin
es signage ad
en used at in
right turn lan
owed the exp
re as follows:
lane width is
ket should ha
nch line and
mbined lane, w
n Only” sign w
ists to use a r
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
wn Valley Pkwy
o Rd., Lake F
Turn Lane
ane places a s
neates the sp
dvising motor
ntersections l
ne.
perimental us
:
13 feet; narr
ave a minimum
bicycle lane
without exclu
with an “Exce
right turn lan

S STRATEG
ransportation
y, Dana Point
orest
e
standard-widt
pace for bicyc
rists and bicyc
acking sufficie
se of combine
rower is prefe
m width of 4
marking sho
uding cars fro
ept Bicycles”
e.

5.0 GY
Authority
t
th bike lane
clists and mo
clists of prop
ent space to
ed bike lane/t
erable.
feet with 5 fe
ould be used
m the sugges
plaque may
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
on the left s
otorists withi
per positionin
accommodat
turn lane mar
eet preferred
to clarify b
sted bicycle ar
be needed to

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
side of a dedi
n the shared
ng within the
te both a sta
rkings. Previ
d.
icyclist positi
rea.
o make it leg
OLKIT
101
icated
d lane.
e lane.
andard
ously,
ioning
gal for

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Unless th
treatment
Additiona
• N
• A
Existing L
• N

5.6.5 Int
Descriptio
Bicycle pa
intersectio
intersectio
crossing m
Guidance
• Se
e FHWA res
t will not be r
l References
NACTO. Urba
AASHTO. Gui
Locations
None
tersection
on
avement mar
on or across
on and provid
motor vehicle
ee MUTCD S
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
umes grantin
recommende
and Guideline
an Bikeway D
ide for the D
Crossing M
rkings throug
a driveway o
de a clear bo
es in the adjac
Section 3B.08
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
g permission
d.
es
Design Guide.
evelopment o
Markings
gh intersectio
or ramp. The
undary betwe
cent lane.
8: “dotted line

S STRATEG
ransportation
to experime
2014.
of Bicycle Fac
ons indicate t
ey guide bicyc
een the paths
e extensions”

5.0 GY
Authority
ent with a com
cilities. 2012.
the intended
clists on a sa
s of through
”
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
mbined bike
d path of bic
afe and direct
bicyclists and

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
lane/turn lane
cyclists throu
t path throug
d either throu
OLKIT
102
e, this
gh an
gh the
ugh or

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Additional
• A
• C
• N
Materials a
Because t
crossings
Existing Lo
• N
Potential L
• Pa
References an
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
NACTO. Urba
and Maintena
the effectiven
should be a h
ocations
None
Locations
acific Coast H
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
an Bikeway D
nce
ness of marke
high priority.

Hwy, Dana Po
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
evelopment o
Design Guide.
ed crossings
oint and Lagu

S STRATEG
ransportation
of Bicycle Fac
2014.
depends ent
na Beach

5.0 GY
Authority
cilities. 2012.
tirely on thei
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ir visibility, m

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
maintaining m
OLKIT
103
arked

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.6.6 Tw
Description
A two-sta
from a rig
A two-sta
the origin
when the
Guidance
• A
Fe
• A
R
o
bi
st
• G
Discussion
While tw
results in
Additional
• N
Materials a
Paint can
Existing Lo
• N
Potential L
• A
• M
wo-Stage Tu
n
age turn box
ght side cycle
age left turn b
nal direction
cross street
A two-stage tu
ederal and Ca
A two-stage tu
Required desig
r through arr
icycles if the
tage of their t
Green colored
wo-stage turn
higher averag
References an
NACTO. Urba
and Maintena
wear more q
ocations
None
Locations
Antonio Pkwy
Marguerite Pkw
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
rn Box
provides bic
e track or bik
box allows b
of travel, dur
receives a gr
urn box to fa
alifornia MUT
urn box for u
gn elements i
row, full-time
signal phase
turn is actuat
d pavement is
ns may increa
ge signal delay
nd Guidelines
an Bikeway D
nce
quickly in high
at Santa Mar
wy at Oso Pk
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
cyclists a way
ke lane. Bicycl
icyclists to co
ring one stag
reen light to c
cilitate a jugh
TCD’s.
se other than
nclude a bicy
turn on red
that permits
ed.
s optional.
ase bicyclist
y for bicyclist
Design Guide.
h traffic areas.
rgarita Pkwy,
kwy, Mission V

S STRATEG
ransportation
y to make left
lists are often
ontinue straig
ge of a traffic
complete the
handle turn at
n for a jughan
ycle symbol p
prohibition fo
s bicyclists to
comfort in
ts versus a ve
2014.
.

Rancho Santa
Viejo

5.0 GY
Authority
t turns at mu
n reluctant to
ght while the
c signal, and t
move.
t a T-intersec
ndle turn at a
pavement mar
for the cross
o enter the i
many locatio
ehicular style
a Margarita
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ulti-lane signa
o weave into
traffic signal
then wait for
ction is prese
T-intersectio
rking, a pavem
street, and p
intersection
ons, this con
left turn man

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
alized intersec
traffic to tur
displays gree
r the second
ntly allowed
on is experim
ment marking
assive detect
during the se
figuration typ
neuver.

OLKIT
104
ctions
rn left.
en for
stage
in the
mental.
g turn
ion of
econd
pically

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.6.7 Bik
Descriptio
Some arte
can create
because o
vehicles. S
minimizing
Guidance
Entrance
•
Exit Ramp
•
ke Lanes at
on
erials may co
e difficulties f
of low appro
Strategies to
g crossing dis
Ramps:

Angle the
before driv
ps:

Use a jug
and add yie
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Diverging R
ontain high sp
for bicyclists.
oach angles
improve safe
stances.
bike lane to
vers’ attentio
handle turn t
eld striping an
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Ramp Lanes
peed freewayThe entrance
and feature
ety focus on
o increase the
on is focused o
to bring bicyc
nd signage to

S STRATEG
ransportation
s
-style designs
e and exit lan
high speed
increasing sig
e approach a
on the upcom
clists to incre
the bicycle a

5.0 GY
Authority
s such as mer
nes typically h
differentials
ght distances,
angle with en
ming merge.
ease the app
approach.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
rge lanes and
have intrinsic
between bic
, creating for
ntering traffic.
roach angle w

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
exit ramps, w
visibility pro
cyclists and m
rmal crossings
. Position cro
with exiting t
OLKIT
105
which
blems
motor
s, and
ossing
traffic,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Green co
Additiona
• A
• C
• C
Materials
Locate cr
Existing L
• Sa
• R

5.6.8 Fr
Descriptio
Freeway
if they are
designs m
Key desig
should be
Guidance
Entrance
• A
an
fr
• A
th
p
la
Exit Ramp
• M
cr
o
m
n
lored paveme
l References
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
Caltrans. Com
and Mainten
ossing markin
Location with
an Juan Creek
Research Dr. a
eeway Inte
on
Interchanges
e poorly desi
may be partic
gn features a
e included to
Ramps:

A right-turn la
n “add-lane”
reeway entran
A bike lane sh
he right turn
rovides clear
ane’ on-ramps
ps:

Motorists exis
rossroad sho
r yield sign,
movement.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ent is optiona
and Guideline
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
mplete Interse
nance
ngs out of wh
Proposed Imp
k Rd at Valle
at Irvine Cent
erchange D
can be signif
igned. Travel
cularly challe
at conflict a
improve the
ane should be
for motoris
nce ramp.
hould be prov
lane. Dotted
priority for
s.
sting the free
ould be contr
rather than
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
al.
es
evelopment o
ections. 2010.
heel tread wh
provement
Rd, San Juan
ter Dr., Irvine
Design
ficant obstacl
through som
enging for yo
reas through
experience fo
e configured w
sts turning r
vided along t
d through bik
bicyclists at r
eway and tur
rolled by a st
n allowing a

S STRATEG
ransportation
of Bicycle Fac
en possible to
Capistrano
e
es to bicyclin
me interchang
oung bicyclist
h interchange
or bicyclists.
with a taper a
right onto th
the left side o
ke lane stripin
right turn ‘ad
rning onto th
op sign, signa
a free flowin

5.0 GY
Authority
cilities. 2012.
o minimize w
ng
ge
ts.
es
as
he
of
ng
dd
he
al,
ng
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
wear and main

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
ntenance cost
OLKIT
106
ts.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
The on-ra
Designs t
traffic to s
negotiate.

Additiona
• A
• C
• C
Materials
Locate cr

5.7 Sign
Determin
particular
include s
crossing t
bicycle fa
construct
track with
or pedest
with bicy
crossing b
maneuver
n
amps should
that are func
slow or stop.
.
l References
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
Caltrans. Com
and Mainten
ossing markin
nalization
ning which ty
r intersection
speed limits,
traffic, and th
acilities. Signa
tion of a pro
h potential tu
trian conflict
ycle signals m
bicyclist, and
rs.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
be configure
tional for bic
. Designs that
and Guideline
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
mplete Interse
nance
ngs out of wh
ype of signal
depends on
traffic volu
he configurat
als may be
otected bicyc
urning conflic
ts at major c
may reduce
discourage
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ed as a right-t
cycle passage
t encourage h
es
evelopment o
ections. 2010.
heel tread wh
or beacon
a variety of f
umes, anticip
ion of planne
necessary as
cle facility su
cts, or to dec
crossings. An
stress and
illegal and un

S STRATEG
ransportation
turn-only “ad
e typically en
high-speed tra
of Bicycle Fac
en possible to
to use for
factors. These
pated bicycle
ed or existing
s part of the
ch as a cycle
crease vehicle
n intersection
delays for
nsafe crossing

5.0 GY
Authority
dd lane” to a
ncourage slow
affic moveme
cilities. 2012.
o minimize w
a
e
e
g
e
e
e
n
a
g
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
ssert through
wing or requ
ents are diffic
wear and main

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
h bicyclist pr
uire motor v
ult for bicycli
ntenance cost
OLKIT
107
iority.
vehicle
ists to
ts.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.7.1 Bic
Loop or V
For signa
normally
or pedest
installatio
at the lim
either in
detection
to bicycl
expected
bicyclist
detected.
lane of tr
of the roa
Push Butt
A bicyclist
required l
mounted
a bicyclist
Discussion
Proper b
criteria: 1
clear guid
requireme

CA MUTC
Additiona
• A
• N
• C
• C
• C
Materials
Signal det
roadway p
cycle Dete
Video Detecto
alized interse
receive a gre
trian, the Ca
n of detecto
mit line. This
nductive loo
. Traffic actu
les, should
path, and
to the poin
This allows
ravel without
ad to trigger a
ton Actuation
t pushbutton
limit line dete
in a location
t without havi
n
bicycle detect
) accurately d
ance to bicyc
ent for bicycl
CD 2014.
l References
AASHTO. Gui
NACTO. Urba
California MUT
Caltrans. Polic
Caltrans. Com
and Mainten
tection and ac
pavement ma
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ection and A
ors
ection movem
een light unles
alifornia Veh
rs capable of
is most comm
op detectors
uated signals
be located
stenciling
nt where th
the bicyclist
having to ma
a push button
may be used
ectors. These
that permits
ing to dismou
tion should
detects bicycl
clists on how
le detection a
and Guideline
ide for the D
an Bikeway D
TCD. 2014.
cy Directive 0
mplete Interse
nance
ctuation for b
arkings.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Actuation
ments that d
ss actuated b
icle Code re
f detecting bi
monly handle
s or with
should be se
in the bic
should direc
he bicycle w
to stay with
aneuver to th
n.
d to suppleme
e buttons sho
s their activat
unt.
meet two p
lists and 2) pr
to actuate de
at all new and
es
evelopment o
Design Guide.
09-06. 2009.
ections. 2010.
bicyclists sho

S STRATEG
ransportation
do not
by a car
equires
cyclists
ed with
video
ensitive
cyclist’s
ct the
will be
hin the
he side
ent the
ould be
tion by
primary
rovides
etection (e.g.,
d modified ap
of Bicycle Fac
2014.
uld be mainta

5.0 GY
Authority
, what button
pproaches to
cilities. 2012.
ained with ot
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
n to push, wh
traffic signals
ther traffic si

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
here to stand)
s is included
gnal detectio
OLKIT
108
). The
in the
on and

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.7.2 Bic
Descriptio
The Califo
Bicycle Sig
detailed a
not in co
right or le
signs, pave
The size
reserved
Additiona
• C
• FH
Materials
Bicycle sig
and respo

5.7.3 Ac
Descriptio
Active w
yielding co
include co
Flash Beac
Guidance
Warning
signals.
• W
ce
pe
cycle Signa
on
ornia MUTC
gnal Warrant
application of
onflict with an
eft turns on r
ement markin
of signal lens
only for supp
l References
California MUT
HWA Interim
and Mainten
gnal heads req
onding to pow
ctive Warn
on
warning beaco
ompliance at
onventional c
cons (RRFB).
beacons sha
Warning beac
ease operatio
edestrian or
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
al Heads
D authorizes
ts. FHWA’s I
bicycle signa
ny simultaneo
red. The bicyc
ngs, separate
ses may be 4
plemental nea
and Guideline
TCD. 2014.
m Approval IA
nance
quire the sam
wer outages.
ning Beaco
ons are user
crossings of
circular yellow
RRFBs have
ll not be use
ons shall init
on at a prede
bicyclist clear
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
s the use of b
Interim Appr
l indications.
ous motor ve
cle movemen
turn signal in
inches, 8 inc
ar side mount
es
A-16, 2013.
me maintenan
ns
r-actuated illu
multi-lane or
w flashing be
blanket appro
ed at crossw
tiate operatio
etermined tim
rs the crossw

S STRATEG
ransportation
bicycle signal
roval IA-16, d
Bicycle signa
ehicle movem
t may not be
ndications, or
ches, or 12 in
tings.
ce as standar
uminated dev
r high volume
eacons, in-roa
oval in Califo
walks control
on based on
me after actu
walk.

5.0 GY
Authority
heads only a
dated Decem
l heads may b
ments at a si
e modified by
other traffic
nches in diam
rd traffic signa
vices designe
e roadways. T
adway warnin
rnia per FHW
led by YIELD
pedestrian o
uation or, wi
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
at locations t
mber 24, 2013
be used for a
ignalized inte
lane-use sign
control devic
meter, with th
al heads, such
ed to increa
Types of activ
ng lights, or

WA MUTCD
D signs, STO
or bicyclist a
ith passive de

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
that meet Ca
3, specifies a
a movement t
ersection, inc
ns, turn prohi
ces.
he 4-inch len
h as replacing
ase motor v
e warning be
Rectangular
IA11.

OP signs, or
actuation and
etection, afte
OLKIT
109
altrans
more
that is
luding
bition
ns size
bulbs
vehicle
eacons
Rapid
traffic
d shall
er the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Additiona
• N
• C
• FH
• C
Materials
Dependin
years with
Existing L
• Sh
Potential
• A

5.7.4 Pe
Descriptio
A pedestr
a signal-he
bicycle sig
traffic. W
both red
red indica
beacons a
volumes d
conventio
California
hybrid be
l References
NACTO. Urba
California MUT
HWA. Interim
Caltrans. Com
and Mainten
ng on power
hout issue.

Locations
hady Canyon
Locations
Aliso Creek Bi
edestrian H
on
rian hybrid be
ead with two
gnal heads for
When actuated
lights are dis
ations during
are used to i
do not suppo
onal signal wil
a law that pr
acons may on
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
and Guideline
an Bikeway D
TCD. 2014.
m Approval (
mplete Interse
nance
supply, main
Trail at Shad
ike Path at Lo
Hybrid Bea
eacon, also k
o red lenses o
r the minor s
d by a pedest
played steadi
g the pedest
mprove nonort installation
l encourage a
ohibits the in
nly be used at
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
es
Design Guide.

IA-11). 2008.
ections. 2010.
ntenance can
dy Canyon Rd
os Alisos Blvd
cons
known as a H
over a single
street. The s
trian, the sign
ly during the
rian clearanc
-motorized c
n of a conven
additional mo
nstallation of
t mid-block c

S STRATEG
ransportation
2014.
be minimal.
d, Irvine
d, Lake Forest
igh-intensity
yellow lens
signal normall
nal displays a
pedestrian w
ce interval. A
rossings of m
ntional traffic
otor vehicle t
f STOP signs
rossing locati

5.0 GY
Authority
If solar pow
t
Activated Cr
on the major
ly displays da
yellow light,
walk interval,
As used in o
major streets
c signal or wh
traffic on the
on approac
ions.
0 BICYCLE FA
KOA
wer is used, R
rossWalK (HA
r street, and
ark indications
followed by
followed by
other states,
in locations
here there ar
minor street
hes to signal

ACILITY TOO
A Corporation
KTU+A
RRFBs can ru
AWK), consi
pedestrian a
s to motor v
an interval w
alternating fla
pedestrian h
where side-s
re concerns t
t. However, d
ized intersec
OLKIT
110
un for
ists of
and/or
vehicle
where
ashing
hybrid
street
that a
due to
ctions,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Guidance
Pedestrian
speed and
• If
hy
• Pa
at
Discussion
An altern
indication
displays n
that requi
Additiona
• C
Materials
Signing an
Existing L
• La
• C
n hybrid beac
d volumes are
installed wit
ybrid beacon
arking and ot
t least 20 feet
n
native to a p
during the
o dark indica
ires coming t
al References
California MUT
and Mainten
nd striping nee
Locations for P
aguna Niguel
Creekside Acc
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
cons may be
e excessive fo
thin a signal s
to be coordi
ther sight obs
t beyond the
pedestrian hy
pedestrian c
ations that co
o a stop.
and Guidelin
TCD. 2014.
nance
ed to be main
Potential Imp
Family YMCA
cess Rd at Ali
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
installed wit
or comfortabl
system, signa
inated with o
structions sho
marked cros
ybrid beacon
clearance pha
ould be interp
es
ntained to he
provement
A Bike Path a
so Viejo Pkw

S STRATEG
ransportation
thout meetin
le user crossi
l engineers s
ther signals.
ould be prohi
swalk
n is a standa
ase. The adv
preted by a m
lp users unde
at Crown Vall
wy and Briar G
GY
Authority
ng traffic signa
ing.
hould evaluat
ibited for at l
ard signal fac
vantage of a
motorist to be
erstand any u
ley Pkwy, Lag
Glenn, Aliso V
KOA
al control wa
te the need
least 100 feet
ce that displa
standard sig
e a symptom
nfamiliar traff
guna Niguel
Viejo

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
arrants if roa
for the pede
t in advance o
ays a flashin
gnal face is t
of a power o
ffic control.

DING
111
adway
estrian
of and
g red
that it
outage

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.8 Shar
On share
vehicles u
facilities a
speeds an
can be u
wide outs
vehicle dr
into the
bicyclist,
shoulder
employ a
simple sig
more c
directiona
chicanes,
calming d
volumes.

5.8.1 Sig
Description
Signed s
facilities g
lower sp
Class III fa
with no
signage to
route. Sha
motor ve
unless a w
Guidance
“BIKE RO
Direction
“Bicycles
red Roadw
ed roadways,
use the same
are typically u
nd traffic vo
sed on highe
side lanes or
river will usua
adjacent tr
unless a w
is provide
large variet
gnage and sha
complex t
al signage,
chokers, a
evices to red
gned Share
n
shared road
generally loca
peeds and lo
acilities are d
striped bicyc
o indicate the
ared roadway
ehicle driver
wide outside l
OUTE” - This
al changes sh
May Use Full
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ways
bicyclists an
roadway spa
sed on roads
olumes; howe
er volume ro
r shoulders.
ally have to c
ravel lane to
wide outside
d. Shared
y of treatme
ared lane ma
reatments
traffic
and/or othe
duce vehicle s
ed Roadwa
ways are
ated on roadw
ower traffic
esignated as
cle lanes, bu
e roadway is
ys can be use
will usually h
lane or should
sign (D11-1)
hould be signe
Lane”- This
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
nd motor
ce. These
s with low
ever they
oads with
A motor
ross over
o pass a
lane or
roadways
ents from
arkings to
including
diverters,
er traffic
speeds or
ay
Class III
ways with
volumes.
roadways
ut include
a bicycle
ed on higher
have to cross
der is provide
is intended f
ed with appro
sign (R4-11) s

S STRATEG
ransportation
r volume road
s over into t
ed.
for use where
opriate arrow
sign may be u
GY
Authority
ds with wide
the adjacent
e no unique d
w sub-plaques
used:

KOA
e outside lane
travel lane t
designation of
(D1-1b) or d

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
es or shoulde
to pass a bic
f routes is de
directional sig
DING
112
ers. A
cyclist,
esired.
gnage

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and  O
w
 In
la
Discussio
A Bicycle
automobi
Additional
• A
• C
Materials a
Maintenan
replaceme
Existing Lo
• So
• Pa
Potential L
• C
• V
On roadways
where travel la
n locations w
ane.
n
May Use Ful
le to share th
References an
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
and Maintena
nce needs fo
ent due to we
ocations
outh Ola Vist
acific Coast H
Locations
Calle Amaneca
Via California,
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
where there
anes are too
where it is im
ll Lane sign (R
he road side b
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
nce
or bicycle w
ear.
ta, San Cleme
Hwy, Laguna B
ar, San Cleme
San Juan Cap
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
e are no bicy
narrow for cy
portant to in
R4-11) may b
by side within
evelopment o
wayfinding sign
ente (see pho
Beach
ente
pistrano

S STRATEG
ransportation
ycle lanes or
yclists and m
nform all roa
be used on a
n the same lan
of Bicycle Fac
ns are simila
oto above)
GY
Authority
r adjacent sh
otor vehicles
ad users that
lane that is t
ne).
cilities. 2012.
ar to other
KOA
houlders usab
s to safely ope
cyclists may
too narrow fo
signs, and w

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ble by cyclist
erate side-byoccupy the
or a bicycle a
will need pe
DING
113
ts and
-side.
travel
and an
riodic

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.8.2 Ma
Description
The share
the travel
doors of
lane.

Guidance
Shared lan
 O
 T
 O
 O
arked Shar
n
ed lane mark
lane. The ce
parked cars.
ne markings m
On constraine
To delineate s
On roadways w
On roadways w
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
red Roadw
king (SLM) or
enter of the m
This often r
may be consid
ed roadways t
pace within a
where it is im
where cyclist
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ay
r “sharrow” i
marking shoul
results in the
dered in the f
too narrow to
a wide outside
mportant to in
ts tend to ride

S STRATEG
ransportation
is commonly
d be located
bicyclists be
following situ
o stripe with
e lane where
ncrease vehic
e too close to
GY
Authority
used where
where bicycl
ing near the
uations:
bicycle lanes
cyclists can b
cle driver awa
o parked veh
KOA
parking is al
lists would be
center of the
be expected t
areness of cyc
icles

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
llowed adjace
e clear of the
e right-most
to ride
clists
DING
114
ent to
open
travel

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Class II b
where oth
be used
intersectio
Additional
• C
• C
• N
• M
Existing Lo
• G
• So
Potential L
• B
• Lo
ike lanes sho
her lane narro
on shoulder
ons. (MUTCD
References an
Caltrans HDM
California MUT
NACTO Urba
Model Design
ocations
Gleneyre St, L
outh Ola Vist
Locations
lue Lantern S
ow volume, lo
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ould be consi
owing or rem
rs, on design
D 9C.07)
nd Guidelines
M Chapter 300
TCD 2014
an Bikeway D
Manual of Liv
aguna Beach
ta, San Cleme
St, Dana Point
ow speed str
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
dered on roa
moval strategi
nated Bike L
0 esign Guide,
ving Streets, 2
(see photo ab
ente
t
reets

S STRATEG
ransportation
adways with
es may provi
Lanes, or to
2012
2011
bove)
GY
Authority
outside trav
de adequate
designate B
KOA
el lanes wide
road space.

Bicycle Detec

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
er than 15 fe
Sharrows sha
ction at sign
DING
115
et, or
all not
nalized

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.8.3 Bic
Description
Bicycle bo
treatment
modificati
through-t
Guidance
Signs and
boulevard
• B
m
• Im
bi
1,
• In
an
cycle Boule
n
oulevards are
ts such as sig
ions. These t
trips by non-lo
pavement m
d.
icycle boulev
maintain an 85
mplement vo
icycle boulev
,000 to 3,000
ntersection cr
nd pedestrian
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
evard
e low-volume
gnage, paveme
treatments m
ocal motorize
markings are t
vards should
5th percentile
lume contro
vard and usin
0 vehicles per
rossings shou
ns and minimi
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
e, low-speed
ent markings,
may allow thro
ed traffic.
the minimum
have a max
e speed below
l treatments
ng engineerin
day.
uld be design
ze delay for b

S STRATEG
ransportation
streets mod
, traffic calmin
ough movem
treatments
imum posted
w 22 mph.
such as traf
g judgment.
ed to slow m
bicyclists.

GY
Authority
dified to enha
ng and/or tra
ments of bicyc
necessary to
d speed of 2
ffic diverters
Target moto
motor vehicle
KOA
ance bicyclist
affic reduction
clists while d
designate a
25 mph. Use
based on th
or vehicle vo
es, enhance s

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
t comfort by
n, and interse
iscouraging s
street as a b
traffic calmi
he context o
olumes range
safety for bicy
DING
116
using
ection
similar
bicycle
ing to
of the
from
yclists

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
The term
vehicle vo
treatment
turn restr
orientatio
bulbouts,
Additional
• C
• C
• N
• A
• FH
Existing Lo
• T
Potential L
• T
m “bicycle bo
olumes and/o
ts used to en
rictions, cont
on of stop sig
chokers, traf
References an
Caltrans HDM
California MUT
NACTO Urba
AASHTO. Gui
HWA Mini-R
ocations
Traffic circle at
Locations
TBD
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
oulevard” imp
or speeds to
ncourage cycl
ra-flow acces
gn control to
ffic circles, ro
nd Guidelines
M Chapter 300
TCD 2012
an Bikeway D
ide for the D
Roundabouts.
t Calle Colim
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
plies a facility
o a greater e
ling may inclu
ss through a o
o favor the bi
oundabouts, sp
0 esign Guide,
evelopment o
2010
ma, San Cleme

S STRATEG
ransportation
y that encou
extent than
ude preferent
one-way stre
icycle boulev
peed humps,
2012
of Bicycle Fac
ente (see pho
GY
Authority
urages bicycle
on a typical
tial treatmen
eet, exclusive
vard. Traffic c
turn restrict
cilities. 2012.
oto above)
KOA
e usage whil
Class III ro
nt by means o
traffic signal
calming techn
ions, or barri

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
e reducing m
oute. Some o
of exclusions
phases, or th
niques may in
icades.

DING
117
motor
of the
from
he renclude

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.9 Bike
The abilit
landmarks
Signs thro
• D
• Lo
• T
These sig
the bicycl
safety pur
• H
ne
• H
de
• H
• H
“i
A commu
• Si
• Si
• D
• M
al
Si
in
re
ve

5.9.1 W
Description
A bicycle
bicyclists
wayfinding
Confi
•
•
eway Signin
ty to naviga
s, natural feat
oughout the c
Direction of tr
ocation of de
Travel time/dis
ns will increa
e systems. S
rposes includi
Helping to f
etwork
Helping user
estinations
Helping to add
Helping overc
interested bu
unity-wide bic
ign locations
ign type – wh
Destinations to
May include a
lso visually cu
igns are typi
ntersection of
ecommended
ehicle signage
Wayfinding S
n
e wayfinding
to their de
g signs:
rmation Signs
Indicate to
bicycle rou
May includ
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ng
ate through
tures and oth
city may indica
ravel
estinations
stance to tho
ase users’ com
Signage can se
ing:
familiarize u
rs identify
dress misperc
come a “bar
t concerned”
cycle wayfindi
hat informatio
o be highlight
pproximate d
ue motorists
cally placed
f multiple rou
d that these s
e standards.

Sign Types
system cons
estinations al
s
o bicyclists th
ute.
de destination
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
a city is in
er visual cues
ate to bicyclis
ose destinatio
mfort and acc
erve both wa
users with
the best
ceptions abou
rrier to entr
” bicyclists)
ng signage pla
on should be
ted on each s
distance and
that they ar
at key locati
utes. Too ma
signs be post
s
sists of comp
ong preferre
hat they are
ns and distanc

S STRATEG
ransportation
nformed by
s.
sts:
ns
cessibility to
ayfinding and
the bicycle
routes to
ut time and di
ry” for peop
an would iden
included and
ign – key des
travel time t
re driving alo
ions leading
any road sign
ted at a leve
prehensive si
ed bicycle ro
on a designa
ce/time. Do n
GY
Authority
istance
ple who are
ntify:
design featur
stinations for
to each desti
ong a bicycle
to and along
ns tend to clu
el most visibl
igning and/or
outes. There
ated bikeway.
not include ar
KOA
e not freque
res
bicyclists
ination Bicycl
route and sh
g bicycle rou
utter the righ
e to bicyclist
r pavement m
e are three
. Make moto
rrows.

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ent bicyclists
le wayfinding
hould use ca
utes, includin
ht-of-way, and
ts rather tha
markings to
general typ
orists aware o
DING
118
(e.g.,
g signs
aution.
ng the
d it is
an per
guide
pes of
of the

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Turn
•
•
Decis
•
•
•
•
Discussion
There is n
general m
common
Additional
• A
• C
• N
Materials a
Maintenan
replaceme

5.9.2 W
Guidance
Signs are
more bike
Decisions S
• N
• A
Signs
Indicate w
street ont
with pavem
Include de
sions Signs
Mark the
bikeways.

Inform bic
route to a
Destinatio
The inclus
no standard c
meaning for s
color of bicyc
References an
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
NACTO. Urba
and Maintena
nce needs fo
ent due to we
Wayfinding S
typically plac
eways and at
Signs
Near-side of in
Along a route
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
where a bikew
to another st
ment marking
stinations and
junction o
cyclists of th
ccess key des
ons and arrow
ion of bicycle
color for bicy
ignage colors
cle wayfinding
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
an Bikeway D
nce
or bicycle w
ear.

Sign Placem
ed at decisio
other key loc
ntersections i
to indicate a
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
way turns from
reet. Can be
gs.
d arrows.
of two or
he designated
stinations.
ws are require
e travel time i
ycle wayfindin
s. Green is t
g signage in th
evelopment o
Design Guide.
wayfinding sig
ment
n points alon
cations leadin
in advance of
nearby destin

S STRATEG
ransportation
m one
e used
more
d bike
ed, distances a
is nonstandar
ng signage. Se
he color use
he US, includ
of Bicycle Fac
2014.
ns are simila
ng bicycle rou
ng to and alon
a junction w
nation.

GY
Authority
are optional
rd, but is reco
ection 1A.12
ed for directi
ing those in t
cilities. 2012.
ar to other
utes – typicall
ng bicycle rou
with another b
KOA
but recomme
ommended.
of the MUTC
ional guidanc
the MUTCD.
signs and w
ly at the inter
utes.
bicycle route.

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ended.

CD establishe
e and is the
will need pe
rsection of tw
DING
119
es the
most
riodic
wo or

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Confirmati
• Ev
st
de
ca
Turn Signs
• N
ro
bi
Discussion
It can be
importanc
to determ
Additional
• A
• C
• N
Materials a
Maintenan
replaceme
ion Signs
very one-qua
treet bicycle
ecision sign).
an also act as
s
Near-side of in
oute or does
icyclist.
e useful to c
ce to users th
mine the phys
References an
AASHTO. Gui
California MUT
NACTO. Urba
and Maintena
nce needs fo
ent due to we
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
arter to one-m
facilities, unl
It should be
confirmation
ntersections w
s not go thro
classify a list
hroughout th
ical distance f
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
TCD. 2014.
an Bikeway D
nce
or bicycle w
ear.
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
mile interval
ess another
placed soon
n that a bicycl
where bike r
ough). Pavem
of destinatio
e area. A par
from which t
evelopment o
Design Guide.
wayfinding sig

S STRATEG
ransportation
on off-street
type of sign
after turns to
list is on a pr
routes turn (e
ent markings
ons for inclu
rticular destin
he locations a
of Bicycle Fac
2012.
ns are simila
GY
Authority
t facilities and
is used (e.g.
o confirm des
eferred route
e.g., where th
s can also ind
usion on the
nation’s ranki
are signed.
cilities. 2012.
ar to other
KOA
d every 2 to
., within 150
stination(s). P
e.
he street cea
dicate the ne
signs based
ng in the hier
signs and w

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
3 blocks alon
feet of a tu
Pavement ma
ses to be a b
eed to turn t
on their re
rarchy can be
will need pe
DING
120
ng onurn or
rkings
bicycle
to the
elative
e used
riodic

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.10 Re
Most majo
(e.g., high
dedicated
facility to
riding. Al
through
locations,
other con
measures
result, m
section fo
street w
accommo
Although
measures
where bik

5.10.1 L
Description
Lane narr
for bike l
and nation
feet and s
Guidance
Vehicle la
• B
• A
Bicycle lan
• G
etrofitting E
or streets are
vehicle spee
bike lanes
o accommod
lthough oppo
roadway wi
many majo
nstraints that
within existi
much of the
ocuses on ef
width through
odate dedicate
largely inten
may be ap
ke lanes woul
Lane Narro
n
rowing utilize
anes. Many r
nal roadway d
sometimes 10
ne width:
efore: 10 to
After: 10 to 11
ne width:

Guidance on B
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Existing Str
e characterize
ds and/or vol
are the m
date safe a
ortunities to
dening may
r streets ha
would requir
ing curb-to-cu
guidance p
ffectively real
h striping m
ed bike lanes.
nded for majo
ppropriate fo
d be the best
owing
es roadway s
roadways hav
design standa
0 feet wide tra
15 feet
1 feet
Bicycle Lanes
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
reets to A
ed by conditi
lumes) for wh
ost appropr
nd comforta
add bike la
exist in so
ave physical
re street retr
urb widths. A
provided in
llocating exis
modifications
.
or streets, th
or any roadw
t accommoda
pace that exc
ve existing tra
ards, or which
avel lanes to
applies to thi

S STRATEG
ransportation
dd Bikewa
ions
hich
riate
able
anes
ome
and
rofit
As a
this
ting
to
hese
way
ation for bicyc
ceeds minimu
avel lanes tha
h are not mar
create space
is treatment
GY
Authority
ays
clists.
um standards
at are wider
rked. Most st
for bike lane
KOA
s to provide
than those p
tandards allow
es.

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
the needed
prescribed in
w for the use
DING
121
space
n local
of 11

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Special co
before th
situations
Additional
• A
• A
• C
• C
Materials a
Repair ro
onsideration
e decision is
to provide s
References an
AASHTO. Gui
AASHTO. A P
Caltrans. Califo
Caltrans. Main
and Maintena
ugh or uneve
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
should be giv
made to nar
pace for bike
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
Policy on Geo
ornia HDM. 2
Streets. 200
nce
en pavement s
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ven to the a
rrow travel la
e lanes.
evelopment o
ometric Desig
2012.

5. surface.

S STRATEG
ransportation
mount of he
anes. Center
of Bicycle Fac
gn of Highway
GY
Authority
eavy vehicle t
turn lanes ca
cilities. 2012.
ys and Streets
KOA
traffic and ho
an also be na
s. 2004.

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
orizontal curv
arrowed in c
DING
122
vature
ertain

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.10.2 L
Description
The remo
of a stree
Guidance
Vehicle la
• W
Bicycle lan
• G
Lane Recon
n
oval of a singl
t. Streets wit
ne width:

Width depend
ne width:

Guidance on B
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
nfiguration
e travel lane
th excess veh
ds on project.

Bicycle Lanes
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
will generally
icle capacity p
No narrowin
applies to thi

S STRATEG
ransportation
y provide suff
provide oppo
ng may be ne
is treatment.

GY
Authority
ficient space f
ortunities for
eeded if a lane
KOA
for two bike
bike lane ret
e is removed.

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
lanes on eac
trofit projects
DING
123
h side
s.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Dependin
various la
each direc
bike lanes
Additional
• A
• FH
• C
• C
Materials a
Repair ro

5.11Bicy
Facilitie
Bicycle Par
Bicyclists
bicycle w
term park
employee
Access to T
Safe and e
encourage
bicycle ac
rail vehic
density ar
of many
quarter- t
much as t
ng on a stre
ne reduction
ction) could
s.

References an
AASHTO. Gui
HWA. Evalua
Crashes. 2010
Caltrans. Main
and Maintena
ugh or uneve
ycle Suppo
es
rking
expect a s
hen they rea
king of two
es, students, r
Transit
easy access to
e commuters
ccess to tran
les can incre
reas, where t
residences. P
to half-mile t
two or more
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
et’s existing
configuration
be modified
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
ation of Lane
.

Streets. 200
nce
en pavement s
ort Facilitie
afe, conveni
ach their dest
hours or les
residents, and
o bicycle park
s to access t
sit and space
ease the feas
transit stops a
People are o
to a bus stop
miles to reac
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
configuratio
ns may apply.
to provide o
evelopment o
Reduction “R

5. surface.
es
ent place to
tination. This
s, or long-te
d commuters.
king facilities
transit via bic
e for bicycles
sibility of tra
are beyond w
often willing t
p, while they
ch a transit st

S STRATEG
ransportation
n, traffic ope
. For instance
one travel lan
of Bicycle Fac
Road Diet” M
o secure the
may be shor
rm parking f
is necessary
cycle. Providi
s on buses a
ansit in lowe
walking distan
to walk only
y might bike
tation.

GY
Authority
erations, use
e, a four-lane
ne in each dir
cilities. 2012.

Measures on
eir
rtfor
to
ing
nd
ernce
y a
as
KOA
er needs and
street (with
rection, a cen

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
d safety conc
two travel la
nter turn lane
DING
124
cerns,
nes in
e, and

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.11.1Bi
Description
Secure b
integral pa
parking s
developm
parking
importanc
improvem
where bic
parks and
ing is reco
Bicycle ra
bicycle at
Bicycle Pr
 Su
 A
 Is
 R
Guidance
 D
 A
 A
 D
 A
 A
 Lo
icycle Rack
n
icycle parkin
art of a bikew
should be
ment or red
should be
ce when
ments or deve
cycle traffic
d shopping ce
ommended.
ack type plays
two points a
rofessionals (A
upports the b
Allows locking
s securely anc
Resists cutting
Does not bend
Accommodate
Accommodate
Does not trip
Are easily acce
Are covered if
ocated in are
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ks
ng at likely d
way network.
incorporated
development
given a ba
considering
elopment. In
is more prev
enters, increa
s a major rol
and allow co
APBP) recom
bicycle in at le
g of the frame
chored to gro
g, rusting and
d wheels or d
es high securit
es securing th
pedestrians
essed yet pro
f users will lea
as that cyclist
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
destinations
. Adequate bi
d into any
project. Bi
alanced leve
g car pa
commercial a
valent, as we
ased bicycle
le in the utili
nvenient lock
mmends select
east two place
e and one or
ound
bending or d
damage other
ty U-shaped b
he frame and w
otected from
ave their bicy
ts are most li

S STRATEG
ransportation
is an
icycle
new
icycle
el of
arking
areas
ell as
parkzation of the
king should b
ting a bicycle
es, preventing
both wheels w
eformation
r bicycle parts
bicycle locks
wheels
motor vehicle
ycles for long
kely to trave
Additional R
• AA
Bicycle Fac
• AP
Materials a
Use of pro
GY
Authority
e bicycle rack
be used. The
rack that:
g it from fallin
with a U-lock
s
es
periods
l
References an
ASHTO. Gu
cilities. 2012.

PBP. Bicycle Pa
and Maintenan
oper anchors w
KOA
ks. Only rack
Association f
ng over
k
nd Guidelines
uide for the
Parking Guide 2
nce
will prevent va

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ks that suppo
for Pedestria
Developme
2nd Edition. 20
andalism and th
DING
125
rt the
an and
ent of
010.
heft.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.11.2 O
Description
Bicycle co
on-street
Corrals c
provide m
Businesse
friendlines
sidewalk.
corral to
Pedestrian
Cyclists -
Vehicle d
street cor
Guidance
See guide
• C
• Pa
co
• C
On-Street B
n
orrals are gen
conversions,
an accommo
many benefits
es - Corrals
ss.” They also
Some cities h
improve bicy
ns - Corrals c
Corrals incre
rivers - Corr
rners and blo
lines for sidew
Can be used w
arking stalls
oncrete exten
Can be custom
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Bicycle Co
nerally forme
, but they ar
date up to 20
where bicycl
provide a m
o allow more
have institute
ycle parking in
clear the side
ease the visib
rals improve
cking sight lin
walk Bicycle R
with parallel o
adjacent to
nsion serves a
mized and hav
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
rral
er vehicle par
e now being
0 bicycles per
e use is high
uch higher c
outdoor sea
ed programs t
n front of the
walks and tho
bility of cycling
visibility at in
nes
Rack placeme
or angled park
curb extensi
as delimitatio
ve been desig

S STRATEG
ransportation
rking stalls co
incorporated
r former veh
and/ or grow
customer to
ating for resta
that allow loc
ir business.
ose installed a
g and greatly
ntersections b
ent.
king
ions are goo
on on one sid
ned and fabri
GY
Authority
onverted to b
d into shopp
icle parking s
wing:
parking spac
aurants by mo
cal businesses
at corners als
expand bicyc
by preventing
od candidates
e
cated to com
KOA
bicycle parkin
ing center pa
space. On-str
ce ratio and
oving the bicy
s to sponsor
so serve as cu
cle parking op
g large vehicle
s for bicycle
mplement spe

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
g. Most have
arking lots as
reet bicycle co
advertise “b
ycle parking o
or adopt a b
urb extension
ptions
es from park
corrals sinc
cific locations
DING
126
e been
s well.
orrals
bicycle
off the
bicycle
ns
king at
ce the
s

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
In many c
and is not
take respo
Additional
• AP
Materials a
Physical b
neighbori

5.11.3 B
Description
Bicycle pa
and its co
Three com
• Fu
de
• A
fa
• R
re
Perhaps t
doors and
bicycle loc
Lockers w
can be mi
Guidance
Minimum
• Fo
• Se
• Lo
• A
communities,
t a city-drive
onsibility for
References an
PBP. Bicycle Pa
and Maintena
barriers may
ng businesses
Bicycle Loc
n
arking facilitie
omponents an
mmon ways o
ully enclosed
emand locks
A continuousl
acilities genera
Restricted acc
estricted only
the easiest re
d can secure
cker designs
with coin-ope
tigated by ins
dimensions: w
our-foot side
even-foot min
ocker designs
Access is cont
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
the installati
n initiative. In
the maintena
nd Guidelines
arking Guide 2
nce
obstruct dr
s.
kers
es intended fo
nd accessories
of providing s
lockers acce
operated by
ly monitored
ally available
cess facilities
y to the owne
etrofit is the
individual bic
can be stacke
erated locks c
stalling locker
width (openin
clearance an
nimum distan
s that allow v
rolled by a ke
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
on of bicycle
n other areas
ance of the fac
2nd Edition. 20
rainage and c
or long-term
s.
secure long-te
essible only b
“smartcards”
d facility that
at no charge
in which sho
ers of the bicy
bicycle lock
cycles with th
ed to double
can be a targe
rs with mesh
ng) 2.5 feet; h
nd 6-foot end
ce between f
visibility and in
ey or access c

S STRATEG
ransportation
e corrals is dr
s, the city pr
cility.
010.
collect debris
parking mus
erm bicycle p
by the user,
” equipped wi
t provides a
ort-term typ
ycles stored t
ker. Generally
heir panniers
the parking d
et of theft an
sides to allow
height 4 feet;
clearance.
facing lockers
nspection of c
code.

GY
Authority
riven by requ
rovides the fa
s. Establish a
st protect aga
parking are:
either coin-o
ith touch-sen
at least medi
e bicycle rac
there
y, they are a
s, computers,
density.
nd may attract
w periodic ins
depth 6 feet.
s.
contents are
KOA
uests from ad
acility and bu
a maintenanc
ainst theft of
operated, or
nsitive imbedd
ium-term typ
cks are provi
as strong as t
lights, etc., l
t various unin
spection.
.
recommende

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
djacent busin
siness associa
e agreement
f the entire b
by electronic
ded RFID chip
pe bicycle pa
ided and acc
the locks on
left in place.
ntended uses
ed for securit
DING
127
esses,
ations
t with
bicycle
c, onps.
arking
cess is
their
Some
s. This
ty.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Discussion
Long-term
significant
guarantee
parking is
Additional
• AA
• AP
Materials a
Regularly
periodical
m parking fac
tly more secu
e the safety o
free.

References an
ASHTO. Guide
PBP. Bicycle Pa
and Maintena
inspect the
lly to prevent
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
cilities are m
ure. Although
of their bicyc
nd Guidelines
e for the Deve
arking Guide 2
nce
functioning
t access to un
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
more expensi
h many bicyc
cle, long-term
lopment of Bic
2nd Edition. 20
of moving p
napproved use

S STRATEG
ransportation
ive to provid
le commuter
m bicycle par
cycle Facilities.
010.
parts and en
ers.

GY
Authority
de than sho
rs would be w
rking should
2012.
nclosures. C
KOA
rt-term facili
willing to pay
be free whe
hange keys

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ities, but are
y a nominal f
erever autom
and access
DING
128
e also
fee to
mobile
codes

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.11.4 S
Description
A Secure
stations),
Accessible
100 or m
whose big
Guidance
Key featu
• C
• D
• B
• B
m
• B
le
• Se
Discussion
Long-term
provide
significant
commute
guarantee
parking sh
free.

Additional
• A
• A
Materials a
Regularly
periodical
Secure Park
n
Parking Area
is a semi-en
e via key-car
ore bicycles.
ggest concern
res may inclu
Closed-circuit
Double high ra
ike repair sta
ike tube a
machine
ike lock “hit
eave bike lock
ecure access
m parking fa
than shorttly more se
rs would be
e the safety o
hould be free
References an
AASHTO. Gui
APBP. Bicycle
and Maintena
inspect the
lly to prevent
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
king Areas
a for bicycles
nclosed spac
d, combinatio
Increased se
n is theft and
ude:
television mo
acks & cargo
ation with ben
nd maintena
tching post”
ks
for users
acilities are
-term facilit
ecure. Altho
willing to p
of their bicyc
e wherever a
nd Guidelines
ide for the D
Parking Guid
nce
functioning
t access to un
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
s (SPA)
s, also known
ce that offers
on locks, or
ecurity measu
vulnerability.
onitoring
bike spaces
nch
ance item
– allows pe
more expen
ties, but ar
ough many
pay a nomina
le, long-term
automobile pa
evelopment o
e 2nd Edition
of moving p
napproved use

S STRATEG
ransportation
n as a Bike SP
s a higher le
keys, Bike SP
ures create an
vending
eople to
nsive to
re also
bicycle
al fee to
m bicycle
arking is
of Bicycle Fac
n. 2010
parts and en
ers.

GY
Authority
PA or Bike &
evel of secu
PAs provide
n additional t
cilities. 2012
nclosures. C
KOA
& Ride (when
rity than or
high-capacity
transportation
hange keys

6.0 FUND
A Corporation
KTU+A
n located at t
dinary bike
y parking for
n option for
and access
DING
129
transit
racks.
10 to
those
codes

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.11.5 B
Description
Safe and
and secur
necessary
access tr
transit re
expensive
parking sp
to a trans
bicycle wi
of their tr
vehicles sh
For stairc
ramps. Th
the hand
down the
can be fou
Guidance
• Pr
• Pr
Bicycle Pa
• T
• Si
• P
be
Discussion
Providing
the door
including
Additional
• A
• FH
• Le
Materials a
Regularly
Bicycle Acc
n
easy access t
re bicycle pa
y to encourag
ansit via bicy
educes the
e and space
paces. Many
sit stop will w
ith them on t
rip, so buses
ould be equipp
cases at bus o
hese consist o
rails of stair c
e stairs, with
und at the El
rovide direct a
rovide maps, w
arking
The route from
igning should
rovide safe an
e easy to use
bicycle route
-to-door ser
distance, hills
References an
APBP. Bicycle
HWA. Unive
esson 18: Bic
and Maintena
inspect the fu
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
cess to Tra
to transit sta
arking faciliti
ge commuter
ycle. Bicyclin
need to pro
e consuming
people who
want to bring
the transit po
and other tr
ped accordingly
or rail transit
of narrow cha
cases. Cyclist
the bicycles
Monte Bus St
nd convenient
wayfinding sign
m bicycle par
note the loca
nd secure lon
and well mai
es to transit
rvice of bicy
s, riding on bu
nd Guidelines
Parking Guid
rsity Course
ycle and Pede
nce
unctioning of
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
nsit
tions
es is
rs to
ng to
ovide
car
ride
their
rtion
ransit
y.
stations, bicy
annels just wi
ts could place
rolling within
tation and at
access to trans
nage and pavem
king locations
ation of bicyc
ng-term parki
intained.
helps combin
cle riding. T
usy streets, ni
e 2nd Edition
on Bicycle an
estrian Conne
f long-term pa

S STRATEG
ransportation
ycle access co
ide enough to
e their bicycle
n the channe
BART’s 16th
sit stations and
ment markings
s to station/st
cle parking, ru
ing such as bi
ne the long-d
Transit use c
ight riding, in
n. 2010.
nd Pedestrian
ections to Tr
arking moving
GY
Authority
ould be facilit
o accommoda
es onto the si
ls. Examples
Street Statio
d stops from th
s from the bic
top platforms
ules for use, a
icycle lockers
distance cove
an overcome
clement weat
n Transportat
ransit. 2006.
g parts and en
KOA
tated with bic
ate bicycle tir
ide ramps an
of bicycle sta
n.
he bicycle and p
cycle network
s should be w
and instructio
s at transit hu
rage of bus a
e large obst
ther, and bre
tion.
nclosures.

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
cycle staircase
res, installed b
d walk them
aircase side r
pedestrian netw
to transit stat
well-lit and vis
ons as needed
ubs. Parking s
and rail trave
tacles to bicy
eakdowns.

DICES
130
e side
below
up or
ramps
works.
ions.
sible.
d.
should
l with
ycling,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.12 Bik
Regular b
a smoot
transition
drainage
improve b
a menu of

5.12.1 S
Description
Bicyclists
broken gl
avoid the
Debris fr
(pedestria
swept fro
inspection
debris is r
Guidance
Establish
with majo
• Sw
• In
o
• Pa
• Pe
keway Faci
icycle facility
th roadway,
remains re
grates. Pavem
bicycle faciliti
f options to c
Sweeping
n
often avoid
lass and othe
ese hazards, p
rom the road
ans need a cl
om the sidewa
n and mainte
regularly pick
a seasonal sw
or bicycle rou
weep walkwa
n curbed sect
nto gravel sh
ave gravel dri
erform additi
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
lity Mainte
maintenance
ensuring
elatively flat,
ment overlay
es. The follow
consider enha
shoulders an
er debris; the
potentially ca
dway should
lean walking
alk onto the
enance progra
ked up or swe
weeping sche
utes.
ays and bikew
tions, sweepe
oulders.
iveway appro
ional sweepin
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
enance
e includes swe
that the g
and installin
ys are a goo
wing recomm
ancing a maint
nd bike lanes
ey will ride i
ausing conflic
not be swe
surface), nor
roadway. A r
am helps ens
ept.
edule that pr
ways wheneve
ers should p
oaches to min
ng in the fall in

S STRATEG
ransportation
eeping, maint
gutter-to-pave
ng bicycle-fr
od opportuni
mendations pr
tenance regim
filled with g
in the roadw
ts with moto
pt onto side
r should deb
regularly sche
sure that roa
rioritizes road
er there is an
ick up debris
imize loose g
n areas where
GY
Authority
taining
ement
iendly
ity to
rovide
men.
gravel,
way to
orists.
ewalks
ris be
eduled
adway
dways
accumulation
s; on open s
gravel on pave
e leaves accu
Note
(cycle
other
separ
standa
requir
If thi
need
equip
basis
KOA
n of debris on
shoulders, de
ed roadway s
mulate.
- some sepa
e tracks) that
r physical
ration may be
ard street
res a 10-foo
is is the ca
to be m
pment to be
to keep the f

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
n the facility.
bris can be s
shoulders.
rated bike fac
t employ cur
barriers
e too narrow
sweeper, w
ot wide clear
ase, arrangem
made for sm
used on a re
facility clean.

DICES
131
swept
cilities
rbs or
for
w for a
which
rance.
ments
maller
egular

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

5.12.2 G
Description
On street
curbside
water col
the bikew
pan and t
to erosion
standing w
Guidance
Ensure th
• Ex
ac
• In
to
• P
• W
fo
bi
as

5.12.3 R
Description
Bicycles a
surface th
roadways
an import
filled. Un
surface ne
level, and
When res
to improv
Guidance
Maintain a
• En
th
Gutter-to-P
n
ts with concr
area is typic
llects and dra
way is situated
the pavement
n, creating po
water during
at gutter-to-p
xamine pavem
ctivities, and c
nspect the pa
o ensure that
rovide at leas
When adding
or potential d
ike lanes is be
s Portland an
Roadway Su
n
are much m
han are moto
, and some a
tant issue afte
even settlem
earest the cu
d an uneven
surfacing stre
ve safety and
a smooth pot
nsure that on
han ¼”.

DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
Pavement T
rete curbs an
cally devoted
ains into catc
d near the tr
t edge. This t
otholes, and a
and after rain
pavement tra
ment transitio
construction
vement two
excessive se
st three feet o
new bike fac
drainage issue
ecoming a sta
d Long Beach
urface
ore sensitive
r vehicles. Va
are smoother
er trenches a
ment after tre
urb where bic
pavement su
eets, use the s
comfort for b
thole-free sur
n new roadwa
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Transition
d gutters, 1 t
d to the gutt
ch basins. On
ransition betw
transition can
a rough surfac
ns.
nsitions have
ons during ev
project activ
to four mont
ttlement has
of pavement o
ilities such as
es. Installing
andard part o
h.
e to subtle c
arious materi
than others.
and other con
enching can
cycles travel.
rface can res
smallest chip
bicyclists.
rface.
ay constructi

S STRATEG
ransportation
and handl
to 2 feet of t
ter pan, whe
n many stree
ween the gutt
n be susceptib
ce for travel.
no more tha
very roadway
ities that occ
ths after tren
not occurred
outside of the
s separated la
bioswales to
of building bik
changes in ro
als are used t
Compaction
nstruction ho
affect the ro
Sometimes c
sult due to s
size and ensu
on, the finish
GY
Authority
ing standin
the
ere
ets,
ter
ble
These areas
an a ¼” vertic
y project for n
ur in streets.
nching constr
d.
e gutter seam
anes, rounda
capture run
ke facilities in
oadway
to pave
n is also
oles are
oadway
compaction is
settling over
ure that the s
ed surface on
KOA
ng water
s can also be
cal transition.
new construc
ruction activit
m and four fee
bouts, and tr
off and avoid
bike-friendly
s not achieve
the course
surface is as s
n bikeways do

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
prone to ret
.
ction, mainte
ties are comp
et is preferred
raffic circles,
d standing wa
communities
ed to a satisfa
of days or w
smooth as po
oes not vary
DICES
132
taining
nance
pleted
d.
check
ater in
s such
actory
weeks.
ossible
more

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and • M
ad
• In
to
• If
Sw
• D
it
so

5.12.4 D
Description
Drainage
typically h
grates we
a bicyclist
bicyclist to
Guidance
Require a
that bicyc
• C
ne
no

5.12.5 B
Description
Motor ve
where it c
this way,
Maintain pavem
djacent to rai
nspect the pa
o ensure that
chip sealing
weep loose c
During chip se
may be appr
o as not to cr
Drainage G
n
grates are ty
have slots th
ere designed w
t were to rid
o tumble ove
all new draina
cle tires and a
Create a prog
ecessary – te
ot be an acce
Bikeway Ma
n
ehicle traffic t
can accumula
proper maint
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ment so ridg
lway crossing
vement two
excessive se
is to be per
hips regularly
eal maintenan
ropriate to c
reate an unac
rates
ypically locat
hrough which
with linear pa
e on them, t
er the handleb
age grates be
assistive devic
gram to inve
emporary mod
eptable altern
aintenance
tends to “sw
ate in bicycle
tenance direc
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
ge buildup do
gs.
to four mont
ttlement has
rformed, use
y following ap
nce projects, i
hip seal the t
cceptable ridg
ted in the gu
h water drain
arallel bars sp
the front tire
bars and susta
bicycle-friend
ces do not fall
entory all exi
difications suc
ative to repla
e and Oper
weep” debris
lanes. Maneu
ctly affects saf

S STRATEG
ransportation
oes not occu
ths after tren
not occurred
the smallest
pplication.
if the paveme
travel lanes o
ge between th
tter area nea
ns into the m
pread wide en
could becom
ain potentially
dly, including
l through the
isting drainag
ch as installin
acement.
rations
like litter an
vering to avo
fety and stree
GY
Authority
ur at the gut
nching constr
d.
possible chip
ent condition
only. Howeve
he bike lane a
ar the curb
municipal sto
nough for a t
me caught in
y serious inju
grates that h
vertical slats
ge grates, an
ng rebar horiz
nd broken gla
oid such hazar
et sweeping m
KOA
tter-to-pavem
ruction activit
p on bike lan
of the bike l
er, use cautio
and travel lane
of a roadway
rm sewer sy
tire to becom
the slot. Thi
uries.
ave horizonta
s.
d replace ha
zontally acros
ass toward t
rds can cause
must be a pri

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ment transitio
ties are comp
nes and shou
lane is satisfa
on when doin
e.
y. Drainage g
ystem. Many
me caught so t
is would caus
al slats on the
azardous grat
ss the grate s
he roadway
e a cyclist to f
iority on road
DICES
133
on or
pleted
ulders.
ctory,
ng this
grates
older
that if
se the
em so
tes as
should
edges
fall. In
dways

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and with bicyc
by requiri
place or s
When any
satisfactor
restored
sometime
paving re
combined
bikeway f
require t
restoring
Construct
an impor
pavement
irregularit
restored
longitudin
these pro
deteriorat
Bicycle fac
traveled r
into the p
Guidance
Colored P
 W
cle facilities, e
ing towing co
simply swept
y roadwork r
ry quality wit
to the prio
es seem to “
epairs are m
d with poor s
facilities can
the demolitio
bikeway func
tion activities
rtant effect o
t heights, ro
ties. Permit c
to their pre
nal cracks wi
oblems shoul
tion that migh
cilities should
routes. Also,
pathway or ob
Pavement Ma
Waterborne P
o Over
replace
Organ
traffic
availab
waterb
o Water
pavem
paint
expose
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
especially in c
ompanies to f
to the curb o
repairs are do
th particular a
r markings,
disappear” af
ade over tim
surface recon
be “lost,” w
on and rebu
ction.
s controlled t
on roadway
ugh surfaces
conditions sh
e-construction
ill develop. S
d be develop
ht occur as a
d be swept re
adjacent shru
bstructing cyc
aterials:

Paints
the past 10
ed conventio
ic Compound
paints are th
ble. Glass be
borne paint to
rborne paint
ments but hav
type tends t
ed to factors
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
urb lanes and
fully clean up
or shoulder af
one by the C
attention to s
or new mar
fter roadway
me and are
nstruction fo
which can dis
uilding of adj
through perm
surface quali
or longitud
hould ensure
n conditions,
Strict specific
ped. A five y
result of faul
egularly, at lea
ubs and trees
clists’ views.
years, trans
onal solvent
ds (VOC) and
he most wide
eads are eit
o provide ret
s generally
ve the shorte
to wear off
s such as hig

S STRATEG
ransportation
d along the cu
crash sites to
fter collisions
City or other
surface smoo
rkings if calle
construction
not prompt
ollowing long
scourage cycl
jacent roadw
mits, such as d
ty where cy
dinal gaps in
that paveme
, that no ve
cations, stand
year bond sh
lty reconstruc
ast twice a m
s should be ke
portation age
paints with
d other newe
ely used and
her pre-mixe
tro-reflectivit
provide equ
est service li
rapidly and
h traffic volu
GY
Authority
urbs themselv
o prevent gla
s.
agencies, the
othness suitab
ed for in a
n occurs. Th
tly followed
periods out
ling in gener
ways can cau
driveway, dra
yclists operat
adjoining pa
ent foundatio
rtical irregul
dards and ins
hould be hel
ction of the r
month, and pr
ept trimmed
encies in the
waterborne
er pavement m
least expens
ed into the
ty.
al performan
ife of all pav
lose retroumes. Althoug
KOA
ves. Law enfo
ass and debris
e roadway mu
ble for cycling
project. Bicy
is can happe
by proper
of service d
ral. Construc
use problem
ainage and uti
te in the for
avements, or
on and surfac
arities will r
spections de
d to assure
roadway surfa
referably mor
back to prev
e United Stat
paints that
marking mate
sive pavement
paint or d
nce on asph
vement marki
reflectivity q
gh still a wid

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
orcement can
s from being
ust be restor
g. Striping mu
ycles facilities
n incrementa
re-striping. W
due to road w
ction projects
s maintaining
ility work can
rm of misma
r other pave
ce treatment
result and th
signed to pr
correction o
ace.
re often for h
vent encroach
tes have gra
have low Vo
erials. Waterb
t marking ma
dropped onto
halt and con
ing materials
quickly after
dely used ma
DICES
134
assist
left in
red to
ust be
s also
ally as
When
work,
s that
g and
n have
atched
ement
ts are
at no
revent
of any
heavily
hment
adually
olatile
borne
aterial
o the
ncrete
. This
being
aterial,

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and  R
 D
 T
Paint Typ
 W
 R
waterb
somet
Regular Solven
o This ty
is the
and sa
consid
often r
Durable Liquid
o Durab
(MMA
except
surface
epoxy
being h
durabl
Thermoplastic
o Th
pig
th
pe
re
be
ma
th
th
e Estimated P
Waterborne
o Paints
Easy c
sands/
Regular
o Solven
roads
clean-u
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
borne paint
hing more du
nt Paint
ype of paint c
least expensi
and for skid
dered a nonrequires annu
d Pavement M
ble Liquid Pav
A). Epoxy pain
tional adhesi
e is properly
paints and b
highly durable
e and can be
s
hermoplastics
gments, bind
ermoplastics:
etroleum-deri
sins. One of
e re-applied
arking as wel
ermoplastic m
ere have bee
Product Life A
9-36 months
lean-up and d
abrasives * Pa
nt Paint 9-36
* Short life o
up and dispos
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
is also used
urable.
can be used u
ive. Sometim
resistance ar
durable pave
ual re-applicat
Markings
vement Mark
nt has traditi
on to both
y cleaned bef
both asphalt
e when applie
sprayed or e
s are a durab
ders (plastics
: hydrocarbon
ived resins; a
the added ad
over older t
l as saving on
materials usu
n mixed resu
Advantage Di
s * Inexpensi
disposal * Sh
avement mus
months* * I
on high-volum
sal * Pavemen

S STRATEG
ransportation
d as an inter
universally for
es additives s
re widely use
ement markin
tion.
kings (DLPM
onally been v
asphalt and
fore applicati
and concrete
ed on both pa
extruded but
ble pavement
s and resins
n and alkyd. H
and alkyd the
dvantages of
thermoplastic
n the costs of
ually perform
lts when they
sadvantages:
ive * Quick-d
ort life on hi
st be warm or
nexpensive *
me roads * Su
nt must be wa
GY
Authority
rim marking
r just about a
such as reflec
ed to mark
ng and is eas
M) include ep
viewed as a
concrete pa
ion. The stro
e pavement s
avement surfa
generally req
marking mat
s) and filler
Hydrocarbon
ermoplastics
using thermo
c markings, t
f removing old
very well o
y have been a
drying * Long
igh-volume ro
r it will not a
* Quick-dryin
bject to dama
arm or it will
KOA
material unt
any pavement
ctive glass be
road surface
sily worn by
poxy and Me
marking mate
avements wh
ong bond th
surfaces resu
faces. These m
quire long noterial compos
rs. There ar
n thermoplast
are made fr
oplastic is tha
thereby refur
d pavement m
on all types o
applied on co
ger life on lo
oads * Subjec
dhere.
ng * Longer l
age from san
not adhere.

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
til they can
t needing pain
eads for reflec
es. This is typ
y vehicle tire
ethyl Methac
erial that pro
hen the pave
at forms bet
ults in the ma
markings are
-track times.
sed of glass b
re two type
tics are made
rom wood-de
at the materi
rbishing the
markings. Alth
of asphalt sur
oncrete pavem
ow-volume ro
ct to damage
ife on low-vo
ds/abrasives *
DICES
135
apply
nt and
ctivity
pically
es and
crylate
ovides
ement
tween
aterial
highly
beads,
es of
e from
erived
al can
older
hough
rfaces,
ments.
oads *
from
olume
* Easy

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Durable L
 Ep
 T
Source:

NACTO.

FHWA. D
Use of Gr
One signi
bicycle lan
where mo
yield to cy
green bic
areas.

Jurisdictio
because t
in this in
protocol
Source:

NACTO.
http://mut
Liquids for Pa
poxy
o 4 Yea
Requir
be clea
Thermoplastic
o 3-6 Ye
tempe
Subjec
applica
depen
Urban Bikew
Durability and
reen Paint:
ificant change
nes in mixing
otor vehicles
yclists when t
cycle lanes im
ons within th
he agency is
terim approv
is no longer r
Urban Bikew
tcd.fhwa.dot.g
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
vement Mark
rs* * Longer
res coning an
aned off of ro
ears* * Long l
erature for ap
ct to damage
ations * Show
d on traffic vo
way Design G
Retro-Reflec
e is the FHW
g or transition
may cross a
they encount
mprove cyclis
e State must
required to m
val, the proc
required.
way Design G
gov/resource
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
kings:
r life on lowd/or flagging
oadway * High
life on low-vo
pplication *
e from sand
wn to wear q
olume, road c
uide. 2014.
ctivity of Pave
WA’s interim
n zones, such
bicycle lane.
ter them with
st positioning
t notify Caltr
maintain an in
cess has bee
uide. 2014.
s/interim_app

S STRATEG
ransportation
-volume road
during applica
h initial cost *
olume roads *
Recommende
s/abrasives *
quickly in con
condition and
ement Markin
approval for
h as at interse
They are int
hin the painte
g as they trav
rans before p
nventory, but
n streamlined
proval/ia14/in
GY
Authority
ds * More re
ation * Heavy
* Subject to d
* Retro-refle
ed use for sy
* Cost proh
nflict areas *
d application t
ngs (Synthesis
the use of g
ections and in
tended to wa
ed area. FHW
avel across in
proceeding w
t since Caltra
d because F
ndex.htm
KOA
etro-reflectiv
y bead applica
damage from
ctive * No be
ymbols and
hibited if use
Life of pave
time of year
s Study). 2008
green colored
n other poten
arn drivers to
WA studies hav
ntersections a
with green bic
ans has reque
HWA exper

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ve * Slow dry
ation- may ne
sands/abrasiv
eads needed
spot treatme
ed for large
ement markin
8 d pavement w
ntial conflict
o watch for a
ve also show
and other co
cycle lane pro
ested to partic
rimental treat
DICES
136
ying *
eed to
ves
* Any
ents *
scale
ng will
within
zones
and to
n that
onflict
ojects
cipate
tment

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

6.0 FU
The feder
dollars ea
bridge pr
developin
is small, t
projects f
applicatio
funded.

A major
Progress
which wa
$2.4 billio
 T
 R
 Sa
 P
fo
Many fede
more tha
important
may includ
Many citi
program,
active tra
in street r
Long Beac
10 years.
pedestrian
city obtain
For addit
used to h
transport
To help a
source ty
UNDING
ral and state g
ach year to f
ojects to loc
g, and constr
ens of million
for both biki
n to fund ne
source of fun
in the 21st C
s reauthorize
on is allocated
Transportation
Recreational tr
afe Routes to
lanning, desig
or other divid
eral and state
an one source
t, as grants w
de matching a
es have hire
but also to c
nsportation t
repair and ma
ch have brou
Recently O
n projects be
n a portion o
ional informa
help determin
ation project
agencies dete
pe is provide
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
G STRA
government,
fund transpo
cal street rep
ructing bike-r
ns of dollars
ng and walki
eeded infrast
nding for bike
Century (MAP
ed for FY 201
d to California
n alternatives
rails program
o School Prog
gning, or cons
ded highways.
e grants requ
e of money.
will not be awa
a state grant w
ed a bike co
coordinate th
to include bot
aintenance as
ught in over $
Orange Coun
etween and F
of these active
ation, SCAG,
ne the most e
s.
ermine fundin
d with details
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
TEGIES
along with re
rtation progr
pair. Only a
elated projec
are made ava
ng. While t
tructure and
e and pedest
P-2)1 Program
4-2015, prov
a. Eligible act
s
m
gram
structing roa
ire some leve
Developing
arded withou
with a federa
ordinator to
heir funding e
th bike and w
s well as local
$20 million d
nty cities we
FY 2015-2016
e transportati
OCTA and
effective strat
ng sources fo
s regarding ty

S STRATEG
ransportation
S
egional and lo
rams. These
small percen
cts and progra
ailable on a y
the competiti
educational
trian projects
m. The Act w
vides $25.2 b
tivities include
dways with t
el of matching
a strategy t
ut specifying t
al grant, or th
not only he
efforts. Thes
walking, can h
l returns from
ollars in bike
re awarded

6. An active
on funds.

Safe Routes
tegy to obtain
r projects alo
ypes of eligible
GY
Authority
ocal governm
e programs r
ntage of thes
ams. Howev
yearly basis fo
ion for these
programs st
s is the Fede
was signed int
illion dollars
e:
the right-of-w
g funds. As a
to put togeth
the sources o
e use of loca
elp develop
se positions,
elp cities leve
m gas tax and
e and pedestr
over $14 m
e transportat
to Schools
n federal, stat
ong the prop
e projects, m
KOA
ental agencie
range from m
se dollars is
ver, even thou
or funding act
e funds is fie
tands a good
erally funded
to law on July
nationwide o
way of former
a result most
her all of the
of matching fu
l or regional f
and oversee
which now o
erage their ex
d developer fe
rian-related fu
illion dollars
tion coordina
all have reso
te and region
posed corrido
match requirem

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
es, spend billio
major highwa
used for pla
ugh the perce
tive transport
rce, a well-c
d chance of
Moving Ahea
y 6, 2012. Th
of which just
r interstate r
t programs re
e required fun
unds. The str
funds.
e an effective
often use the
xisting investm
ees. Cities su
unds over the
to fund bik
ator can help
ources that c
nal funds for
ors, a summa
ments, and us
DICES
137
ons of
ay and
nning,
entage
tation
rafted
being
ad for
he bill,
under
routes
ely on
nds is
rategy
e bike
term
ments
uch as
e past
e and
p your
an be
active
ary by
se.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

6.1 Fede

6.1.1 Pa
Partnersh
EPA.
 H
m
 D
 E
hu
Grants are

6.1.2 De
The LWC
protect p
tool to e
neighborh
The prog
requested
visit http:/

6.1.3 Riv
This prog
visioning,
used to e
August 1s

6.1.4 Co
The Cent
program,
more affo
program.
safe and e
infrastruct
www.cdc
eral Progra
artnership f
hip for Sustai
HUD offers fu
more livable, w
DOT offers fu
PA offers gra
uman health a
e offered period
epartment
CF state assi
arks and recr
ensure that fa
hood recreati
gram is admi
d basis. The s
//www.nps.go
vers, Trails
gram, funded
program plan
establish highst of each yea
ommunity
ter for Dise
offers grants
ordable wher
An example
easy for peo
ture that may
c.gov/nccdphp
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ams
for Sustain
nable Comm
unding oppor
walkable, and
nding opport
ants to supp
and the envir
dically and can
of the Inte
stance progr
reation resou
amilies have
ion facilities.
inistered thr
state prioritiz
ov/ncrc/progr
s, and Con
through the
nning, goal se
-level plans fo
ar. For more
Transform
ease Control
s designed to
re people wo
e project is p
ple to walk a
y be supporte
p/dch/program
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
nable Com
munities is an
rtunities to h
environment
tunities to sup
ort activities
ronment.
be found at ww
erior – Lan
ram provides
urces. This 50
easy access
rough the Na
zes and select
rams/lwcf/man
servation A
e National Pa
etting, and co
or the Santa R
information
mation Gra
(CDC), thr
o "create hea
ork, live, lea
promoting im
and ride bike
ed by the CT
ms/ communi

S STRATEG
ransportation
munities
interagency
help commun
tally sustainab
pport more li
s that improv
ww.sustainab
nd and Wat
matching gr
0:50 matching
to parks and
ational Parks
ts eligible pro
nual/lwcf.pdf.

Assistance
ark service, p
ommunity out
River Trail an
on these gran
ants
rough their
althier comm
arn and play.
mprovements
es. Class I a
G program.
tytransforma
GY
Authority
partnership
nities realize
ble regions.
ivable walkab
ve the quality
lecommunitie
ter Conser
rants to help
g program is
d open spac
s Service. G
ojects for LW
Program (
provides tech
treach. In th
nd the LA Riv
nts, see www
Community
munities by m
" Active liv
in sidewalks
nd Class IV
For more inf
ation/funds/ind
KOA
between HU
their own v
ble communiti
y of develop
es.gov/partne
rvation Fun
p states and
the primary
e, hiking and
rants are all
WCF assistan
(RTCA)
hnical assistan
he past, these
ver. Project
w.nps.gov/orgs
Transformat
making healthy
ving is one f
s and street l
bike facilities
formation on
dex.htm

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
UD, DOT an
visions for bu
ies.
pment and pr
ership-resourc
nd (LWCF
local commu
federal invest
d riding trails
located on a
ce. For more
nce in the fo
e grants have
proposals ar
s/rtca/apply.h
tion Grant (
y living easie
focus of the
lighting to m
s are types o
these grants
DICES
138
nd the
uilding
rotect
ces.

F)
unities
tment
s, and
an ase info,
rm of
e been
re due
tm
CTG)
er and
grant
ake it
f bike
see

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

6.2 Stat

6.2.1 Ac
California
modes of
Commiss
The A
Progra
single







Progra



For the
Governm
by SCAG
($18 milli
region, 17
low of $
Orange C
2 ATP gui
communit
median, o
Commun
project ar
te Program
ctive Trans
a's Active Tra
f transportat
ion (www.cat
ATP consolidat
am, state Bicyc
program to:

Increase th
Increase sa
Increase m
Advance th
Enhance p
eligible for
Ensure disa
Provide a
am funding is s
50% to the
10% to sm
rural area c
40% to Me
200,000 fo
Orange Cou
ents (SCAG)
received a t
on) was alloc
7 projects we
126,000 to a
County were f
delines presc
ties, which ar
or among the
ities Environm
rea are eligibl
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ms
sportation
ansportation
tion, such as
tc.ca.gov/prog
tes various tr
cle Transporta
e proportion o
afety for non-m
obility for none efforts of reg
ublic health, i
Safe Routes to
advantaged com
broad spectr
segregated into
e state for a sta
mall urban and
competitive pr
etropolitan Pla
or the large urb
unty area, t
. For Fiscal Y
otal of $74.3
cated to disa
ere funded in
maximum o
for infrastruc
ribe that no l
re defined as
most disadva
mental Health
e to receive f
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Program (
Program was
s biking and
grams/ATP.ht
ansportation p
ation Account,
of biking and w
motorized users
-motorized use
gional agencie
including the
o Schools Progr
mmunities fully
rum of projec
o three compo
atewide comp
rural regions
ogram, and
anning Organiz
banized area c
the ATP is
Years 2014-15
million for f
advantaged co
Orange Cou
of $2.6 millio
cture develop
less than 25%
having a med
antaged 10% i
h Screening T
free or reduc

S STRATEG
ransportation
(ATP)
s created in
walking. A
tm):
programs, inc
and federal an
walking trips,
s,
ers,
s to achieve gr
reduction of
ram funding,
ly share in prog
cts to benefit
onents and is d
etitive program
with populatio
zations (MPO)
competitive pr
overseen by
5 and 2015-1
funding bike a
ommunities2.
unty for a tot
n with a me
ment and two
% of overall pr
ian household
in the state (a
Tool), or at le
ced meals und
GY
Authority
2013 to enc
According to
cluding the fe
nd state Safe
reenhouse gas
childhood obe
gram benefits
t many types
distributed as f
m,
ons of 200,00
) in urban are
rogram.
y the South
6, the area o
and pedestria
Of the total
tal of $13 mi
edian of $475
o were for pl
rogram funds
d income less
according to t
east 75% of th
der the Natio
KOA
courage incre
the Californ
ederal Transpo
Routes to Sch
s reduction goa
esity through
(25% of prog
s of active tr
follows:
00 or less for t
eas with popu
ern Californ
of Southern C
an projects of
funding avai
llion. The gra
5,000. Fiftee
lanning.
s benefit disad
s than 80% of
the latest ver
he public scho
onal School Lu

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
eased use of
nia Transport
ortation Altern
hool programs
als,
the use of pr
gram), and
ransportation
the small urba
ulations greate
nia Associatio
California gov
f which abou
lable in the S
ants ranged fr
en of the gra
dvantaged
f the statewid
rsion of the C
ool students i
unch Program
DICES
139
active
tation
natives
into a
rojects
users.
an and
r than
on of
erned
t 25%
SCAG
rom a
nts in
de
CA
n the
m.

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and For ATP
predomin
example c
of the ma
required
specificati
construct
The matc
guidelines
For fiscal
next roun
program c

6.2.2 AB
Since 199
pollution
per vehicl
Managem
local fund
The AB
bikeways/
to specify
Bi
tr
si
st
ve
Other bik
eligible. T
units with
standard
communit
source/tra
guide.pdf?
Cycle I matc
nantly benefit
community sa
atching funds
to be expe
ons, and e
tion capital ou
hing requirem
s.
year 2016-17
nd of grant su
can be found
B2766
91 local gove
from motor
le be collecte
ent District (
s are designe
2766 guideli
/bike paths an
y:
ike lanes, path
ravel by encou
ngle commute
trictly used for
ehicle emission
ke facilities t
This would in
h park and rid
bicycles in lie
ty residents
ansportation/
?sfvrsn=2
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ching funds o
ting a disadv
afety and bike
was any com
ended in the
estimates; rig
utlay; and con
ments for AT
7 and 2017-1
ubmittals will
at www.catc
ernments hav
vehicles. AB
ed by the Dep
(SCAQMD) f
ed to help citi
nes indicate
nd bike trail i
hs or routes a
uraging and in
er vehicle trips
r recreational a
n reductions or
that promote
clude bike ra
de facilities o
eu of gas pow
is eligible.
/ab2766-moto
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
of a least 11.
vantaged com
e education p
mbination of lo
e same proje
ght-of-way c
nstruction eng
TP Cycle II ar
8, the fundin
l be due in M
.ca.gov/progr
ve received A
B 2766 specifi
partment of M
for disbursem
es meet requ
that the de
mprovement
are most effec
creasing the u
s and miles tr
activities will n
r vehicular com
e and facilitat
cks, lockers,
r at the end
wered vehicle
For more o
or-vehicle-sub

S STRATEG
ransportation
47% were re
mmunity, sta
programs) and
ocal, private,
ect phase (p
capital outla
gineering) as
e subject to c
ng available fo
March 2015.
rams/ATP.htm
AB 2766 fund
es that a Mot
Motor Vehicle
ment. Of this
uirements of t
esign, develo
ts are eligible
ctive when the
use of bicycles
raveled, while
not qualify as
mmuter trips re
te the increa
signals, and b
of bicycle tra
es for police
on AB 2766
bvention-fund
GY
Authority
equired for a
and-alone no
d safe routes
state or fede
permits and
ay; support
the Active T
change pendi
or the SCAG
The most cu
m
ds to implem
tor Vehicle R
es and given
s fee, 40% go
the federal an
opment, and
for AB 2766
ey reduce com
s. A bike path
improving sa
an eligible pro
educed or elim
ased use of n
bus racks; and
ails. In additi
officers, com
6 funding see
d-program/ab
KOA
all projects ex
on-infrastruct
to school pr
eral funds. Ma
environmen
for right-o
Transportation
ing finalization
region shou
urrent inform
ment program
Registration fe
to the South
oes to local g
nd state Clea
installation
6 funding. Th
mmute and no
h must elimina
afety and acce
oject because
minated.
non-motorize
d the installati
ion, the purc
mmunity serv
e www.aqmd
b2766-resourc

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
xcept for pro
ture projects
ojects. The s
atching funds
tal studies;
f-way acquis
n Program fu
n of the prog
ld be similar.
mation on the
ms that reduc
ee surcharge
Coast Air Q
governments.
n Air Act.
of bicycle ro
he guidelines g
on-recreationa
ate and/or dec
essibility. Bike
there are no
ed transit are
ion of bike st
hase of elect
ice personne
d.gov/docs/de
ceDICES
140
ojects
s (for
ource
were
plans,
sition;
nding.
gram's
. The
e ATP
ce air
of $6
Quality
The
outes,
go on
al auto
crease
paths
motor
e also
torage
tric or
el, and
efault7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and

6.2.3 Cl
The purpo
on-the-gr
The Coas
The stage
studies, p
review, co
www.scc.

6.2.4 G
Commu
The auctio
Reduction
A portion
through t
(AHSC).
increasing
transport
known as
communit

6.3 Reg

6.3.1 OC
In 2012,
Quality (C
pedestrian
Eligible ap
able to re
cooperati
Federal H
In the 20
minimum
$1 million
were prio
imate Rea
ose of the Cl
ound actions
stal Conserva
es of a proje
property acq
onstruction, m
ca.gov/catego
Greenhouse
unities pro
on proceeds
n Fund. A mi
n of these fu
the Strategic
Eligible proje
g accessibilit
ation options
s transit-orien
ties. For upda
ional & Lo
CTA Bicyc
the OCTA
CMAQ) fund
n projects tha
pplicants inclu
eceive federa
ve agreemen
Highway Admi
14 funding cy
grant size of
n could be se
oritized as par
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
dy Grant P
limate Ready
s that will les
ncy fund may
ect generally
uisition, plan
monitoring, a
ory/grants/
e Gas Re
gram
from the Stat
nimum of 50%
unds will be
Growth Co
ects will inclu
y of housin
s (walking, bik
nted developm
ates on the p
cal Progra
cle Corrido
Board of Di
ds that are c
at are "ready
ude the 35 loc
l funding thro
nts from the
inistration (FH
ycle, $4.3 mi
$100,000 an
egmented int
rt of a multi-j
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
Program –
grant progra
ssen the impa
y include trails
funded by t
nning (for lar
and, in limited
eduction F
te’s Cap and
% of the fund
made availab
ouncil’s Affor
ude those th
ng, employm
king and tran
ment). At le
rogram see h
ms
or Improve
irectors auth
currently auth
to go” as det
cal governme
ough OCTA
ir controlling
HWA) funds.
illion dollars
d a $1 million
to smaller ph
jurisdictional

S STRATEG
ransportation
California
am is to help
acts of climat
s and other p
the Coastal
rge areas or
d circumstanc
Fund: Affo
Trade Progra
ds must be us
ble for bicyc
rdable Housi
at result in a
ment centers
nsit), resulting
ast 50% of th
http://sgc.ca.go
ement Proj
horized 10%
horized unde
termined thro
ent agencies in
or must be
g bodies or
were allocat
n maximum.
hases and sub
active transp
GY
Authority
State Coa
advance the
te change on
public access t
Conservancy
r specific site
ces, maintenan
ordable H
am are appro
sed for afforda
cle-related pr
ing and Sust
a reduction o
s, and key
g in fewer veh
hese funds w
ov/index.php
jects (BCIP
of Federal C
er MAP-21 to
ough compet
n Orange Co
able to prov
through Cal
ted for bike a
However, pr
bmitted as in
portation plan
KOA
astal Conse
planning and
n California’s
to and along
y include pre
es) and desi
nce. For mo
Housing an
opriated in the
able housing.
rojects on a
tainable Com
of greenhouse
destinations
hicle miles tr
will be targete
P)
Congestion M
o be set asid
titive calls for
ounty. Eligible
ide authorizin
ltrans as a d
and pedestria
rojects that re
dividual proj
nning effort (s

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
ervancy
implementat
coastal resou
the coast.
e-project feas
gn, environm
re informatio
nd Sustain
e Greenhous
competitive
mmunities pro
e gas emissio
s via low-ca
raveled (comm
d at disadvan
Mitigation an
de for bicycl
projects.
e agencies mu
ng resolution
direct recipie
an projects w
equired more
ects. Project
such as this d
DICES
141
ion of
urces.
sibility
mental
on see
nable
se Gas
basis
ogram
ons by
arbon
monly
ntaged
d Air
e and
ust be
ns and
ent of
with a
e than
s that
istrict

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and 5 Bikeway
12% was r
The 2016
early 2016

6.3.1 De
Under Ca
Traffic mi
to accom
broader t
improvem
requireme
In order f

1. Id

2. D

3. Id
im

4. D
th
For more
www.cere
San Franc
bike facili
transit-re
http://ww

6.4 Priv
There are
the more

6.4.1 Pe
Formerly
industry-s
ys Strategy) r
required for e
BCIP plan is

6. For more
eveloper Im
alifornia law,
tigation fees,
modate new
term for imp
ments necessi
ents, and roa
for these imp
dentify the pu
Demonstrate a
dentify all sou
mprovements
Designate the
he appropriat
e on the Deve
es.ca.gov/plan
cisco has use
ties. As of
lated proje
ww.metroplan
vate Progra
e a variety of
prominent so
eople For B
known as t
sponsored no
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
received up t
each grant ap
currently un
information a
mpact Fees
developers
infrastructur
developmen
pact fees, de
itated by the
d dedications
act fees to be
rpose to whi
a reasonable
urces and am
; and
approximate
te account or
eloper Impac
nning/financing
d this fee to
2012 the de
ects. To f
ning.org/news
ams
f private sour
ources are di
Bikes Grant
the Bikes Be
on-profit that
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
to 10 additio
pplication.
der review b
about the BC
s
can be char
re improveme
t are commo
dications of
e proposed d
s and improve
e imposed, th
ch the fee is
relationship b
mounts of fun
e dates on wh
r fund.
ct Fee progra
g/chap4.html
fund transpo
velopment fe
find out m
s/newsletters
rces that may
scussed below
t Program
elong Progra
provides com

S STRATEG
ransportation
nal points fo
by OCTA staf
CIP see http://
rged a one-ti
ent fees, and f
on examples
land, and indevelopment
ements are al
he responsible
put;
between the
nding anticipa
hich the abov
m see the Ca
ortation proj
ee had gener
more abou
s/173
y be tapped f
w.
m, Peoplefor
mmunity gran
GY
Authority
r coordinatio
ff with annou
/www.octa.ne
me fee to o
fees for impr
of developme
-lieu fees tha
t. School faci
l examples of
e agency mus
fee and purpo
ated to be u
ve funding is
alifornia Natu
ects ranging
rated over $
ut the San
for funding b
rBikes (www
nts as well as
KOA
on. A minim
ncements reg
et/BCIPcall.as
offset impacts
roving sewer
ent impact fe
at are impos
ility fees, par
f exactions.
st:
ose for which
used to financ
expected to
ural Resource
from buses
100 million d
n Francisco
bike-related p
w.peopleforbik
support for a

7.0 APPEND
A Corporation
KTU+A
um local mat
garding the p
px
s of their pr
and water sy
ees. "Exaction
sed to fund
rk land dedic
h it is charged
ce the incom
be deposited
es Agency we
and street ca
dollars to su
o program
programs. Som
kes.org) is a
advocacy.

DICES
142
tch of
lan by
roject.
stems
n" is a
public
cation
d;
mplete
d into
ebsite
ars to
upport
see
me of
a bike

7.2.1.b
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Bicycle Safety Memorandum Presented at November 16, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting (3110 : Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and The Peop
that lever
projects i
large-scale
Since 199
49 states
$650 mil
www.peo
People-fo
lanes to c
lanes sepa
The Gree
and strate
For more
see http://

6.4.4 Ka
For over
organizati
According
O
en
ne
en
W
co
Cities suc
and educa
For more
pleforBikes C
rage federal f
nclude bike p
e bicycle advo
99, the progra
and the Dist
lion in publ
opleforbikes.o
r-Bikes also s
create low-st
arated from t
en Lane Proje
egic assistance
e information
/www.people
aiser Perm
r 60 years
ions.
g to the Kaise
Our Community
nvironmental c
eighborhoods,
nvironmental s
We work with
ommunities int
ch as Long Be
ation effort.
e on Kaiser Pe
DISTRICT 5
OCTA – Ora
ommunity G
funding and b
paths and rail
ocacy initiativ
am has award
trict of Colum
lic and priva
org/pages/com
sponsors the
tress streets.
traffic by curb
ect hosts han
e, and deliver
on the Gree
eforbikes.org/
anente He
Kaiser Perm
er Permanent
y Health Initia
changes that
schools and w
sustainability a
h community-b
to visible, conc
each have use
The Long B
ermanente gr
5 BIKEWAY
ange County T
rant Program
build moment
l trails, as we
ves.
ded 272 gran
mbia. Their i
ate funding.
mmunity-grant
Green Lane
The program
bs, planters, p
ds-on worksh
rs targeted gr
en Lane Proje
/green-lane-pr
ealthy Eatin
manente has
te website:
atives take a p
promote heal
workplaces. O
and neighborh
based organiz
crete changes—
ed HEAL gran
each grants w
rants see http

S STRATEG
ransportation
m provides fu
tum for bicyc
ell as mountai
nts to non-pr
nvestments t
For more
ts
Project, whic
m focuses on
parked cars, o
hops and stu
rants designed
ect including
roject.
ng Active L
offered gra
prevention-driv
lthy eating an
Our work also
hood safety—k
zations and r
—and ultimate
nts as part of
were obtaine
p://share.kaise
GY
Authority
unding for im
cling in comm
in bike trails,
rofit organizat
total nearly $
information
ch is aimed at
n protected b
or posts.
dy tours for
d to get prote
an excellent
Living (HEA
ants to char
ven approach
nd active living
addresses co
key factors in
residents to t
ely healthier ne
f their bike pr
ed through th
erpermanente
KOA
portant and
munities acro
, bike parks,
ations and loc
$2.5 million a
n on the gr
t helping citie
bike lanes, w
city leaders,
ected bike lan
video on pr
AL) Progra
ritable and
to health, sup
g (often referr
ommunity econ
n promoting h
translate their
eighborhoods.
rogram neigh
heir Public H
e.org/article/g

Laguna Hills City CouncilMarch 28, 2023

Laguna Hills City Council
March 28, 2023