20250715_6_Citywide Bridge Inspection Services2 — Laguna Niguel City Council, July 15, 2025

To:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Jacki Scott, Public Works Director/City Engineer
July 15, 2025
Award of Professional Services Agreement for Citywide Bridge Inspection Services to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Award the Professional Services Agreement for Citywide Bridge Inspection Services to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $169,930;

2. Approve a not-to-exceed 20% contingency of the total contract in the amount of $33,986 for unforeseen conditions or extra work and authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve additional work for a total not-to-exceed amount of $203,91'6, if needed; and,

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and future amendments to the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., subject to the City Attorney making non-substantive changes.

BACKGROUND
The City owns and maintains a transportation network including 141 miles of roadway, 280 miles of sidewalks, and approximately 80 miles of shared-use trails, which together join neighborhoods, provide community enrichment, and facilitate multimodal transportation. Within this transportation network, the City also manages seventeen (17) bridge structures. The City's bridge locations are shown in Attachment "A".

Routine bridge inspections, maintenance and repair are important elements of bridge ownership. A robust bridge maintenance program can help maximize the use of limited resources, extend the useful life of the bridges, improve user safety by managing risk, and maintain community benefit, ultimately resulting in reduced long-term maintenance and replacement costs.

Page2
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is responsible for ensuring the safety and structural integrity of the over 26,000 bridges owned by the State of California and California's local government agencies. As part of this task, Caltrans performs biannual bridge inspections and makes recommendations for repairs, including erosion control, metal repairs, concrete rehabilitation, and deck resurfacing.

Since its incorporation, the City has relied upon Caltrans' bridge safety inspection reports to help guide maintenance efforts on City-owned bridges. As a result of a recent Caltrans bridge safety inspection report, the City conducted maintenance work near the Paseo de Colinas bridge, including drainage improvements and soil and bridge abutment stabilization.

In order to better understand the City's bridge ownership and maintenance needs, the Public Works Department recommends the implementation of a comprehensive assessment of the City's bridges. This assessment will include a structural, geotechnical and maintenance analysis, the development of a comprehensive maintenance plan, and the estimated direct and indirect costs of owning and maintaining the City's bridges.

Additionally, several federal and state grant programs exist to help cities offset the cost of bridge maintenance. The selected engineering firm will identify available grant funding opportunities and assist the City with drafting and submitting grant applications.

Due to the specialized knowledge and experience needed to perform a comprehensive inspection of the City's bridge infrastructure, the City opted to release a Request for Proposals rather than soliciting proposals from the on-call professional services list.

Performing a comprehensive, robust assessment of City-owned bridges and the development of a bridge maintenance plan supports Goal 4 (Infrastructure and Technology) of the City's adopted Strategic Plan.

ANALYSIS
On February 28, 2025, staff published a Request for Proposal (RFP), shown as Attachment "B", to identify the most qualified consultants to provide Citywide Bridge Inspection Services. The goal of the RFP was to award a qualified consultant to perform a comprehensive assessment of the City's bridges. This assessment will provide information to assist staff in identifying future Capital Improvement Program (GIP) projects and maintenance workplans for the City's Public Works Department. Additionally, the consultant will identify grant funding opportunities and assist the City with grant application(s) to offset bridge repair and maintenance costs.

In response to the RFP, six proposals were received. The proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria: (1) Proposed Personnel; (2) Project Approach; (3) Project Controls; (4) Relevant Experience and Client References; and (5) Cost. The Proposals Evaluation Summary can be found as Attachment "C". The table below displays the consultants, total costs and ranking for all received proposals.

Page 3 ends

Ranking Firm Name Total Cost
1 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (Recommended) $169,930
2 T.Y. Lin International $148,989
3 Dokken Engineering $172,181
4 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. $374,112
5 Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc. $587,992
6 FEI Associates Consulting Engineers. $1,250,000
Pursuant to Laguna Niguel Municipal Code Section 3-6-8, professional services contracts of an estimated expenditure of $50,000 or more must be awarded based on the demonstrated competence of the service providers, on the service provider's professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required, on the fairness and reasonableness of the cost of the services to the City and shall not be awarded solely on the basis of cost.

After a thorough review of the proposals received, and based on all relevant factors, staff selected Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. because this firm has the best overall value to perform the Citywide Bridge Inspection Services. Most notably, Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. demonstrated they have more comprehensive experience performing similar assessments in southern California, including the City of Irvine, the City of Huntington Beach, the City of Costa Mesa, the City of Mission Viejo and the City of Santa Ana.

Staff recommends that the City Council award the Professional Services Agreement for Citywide Bridge Inspection Services to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in the not-toexceed amount of $169,930. In addition, the Agreement will include a not-to-exceed 20% contingency of the total contract in the value of $33,986 for additional work for a total notto-exceed amount of $203,916. Staff is recommending a 20% contingency for this service since bridge inspections often require materials testing and geotechnical inspections to confirm conditions that may not be readily apparent. The Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. can be found as Attachment "D".

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

1. The City Council may direct staff to reject all proposals and readvertise the RFP for the Citywide Bridge Inspection Services. Staff believes that rebidding the RFP will not result in more desirable bids.

2. The City Council may decide not to approve the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas and delay the Citywide Bridge Inspection Services to a later date. Staff believes that deferring the proposed services could further delay necessary bridge maintenance services, and increase related bridge maintenance costs.

Page4

FISCAL REVIEW
The adopted Fiscal Years 2025-27 Public Works Department operating budget includes sufficient funding for the Citywide Bridge Inspection Services.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the Professional Services Agreement and has approved the document as to form.

CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Award the Professional Services Agreement for Citywide Bridge Inspection Services to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $169,930;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and future amendments to the Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas, subject to the City Attorney making non-substantive changes.

Kevin Tobin
Maintenance Manager
1 Scott
ublic Works Director/City Engineer
Page5
Attachments:

A. Location Map
B. RFP for Citywide Structural Bridge Inspection Services C. Proposals Evaluation Summary
D. Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

ATTACHMENT A
City Bridge Location Map
Legend
e City Bridges
D Parks
Location 1: Oso Creek (Camino Capistrano)
55C0037
Location 2: Oso Creek Ped (Forbes North)
Location 3: Crown Valley Parkway OH 55C0166
Location 4: Niguel Hills Park
Location 5: Yosemite Park
Location 6: Oso Creek (Crown Valley Parkway)
55C0281
Location 7: Sulphur Creek 55C0496
Location 8: La Paz Rd UC (Yosemite Rd)
Location 9: Equestrian Underpass Moulton
Pkwy 55C0695
Location 10: Sulphur Creek Ped OC (Crown
Valley Park South)
Location 11 : Sulphur Creek Ped OC (Crown
Vallev Park North l
Location 12: Sulphur Creek Vehicle OC (Crown
Valley Park)
Location 13: Equestrian UC (Marina Hills Dr)
55C0612
Location 14: Salt Creek Se,vice Road (Golden
Lantern)
Location 15: Salt Creek Service Road 55C0497
Location 16: Salt Creek Bike Path 55C0500
Location 17: Paseo de Collnas OH 55C0506
Location Map
City of Laguna Niguel Bridge Location Overview

ATTACHMENT B
RFP for Citywide Structural Bridge Inspection Services
City of Laguna Niguel

CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION

SERVICES
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Issued: February 28, 2025 / Due: March 27, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 1 of 27 City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page Z of 27 RFPSummary
RFP Title: CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Scope of Work: See Section 1-4 (Scope of Work)
RFP Submittal Information: Interested Consultants will submit a PDF copy of their Proposal through the City's electronic procurement system (PlanetBids).

Late proposals will not be accepted .

RFP Due Date: March 27, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST
RFP Submittal Requirements: Your proposal must include the information described in Section Ill (Proposal Form and Content) of this RFP.

Consultant proposals will be considered non-responsive if the proposal does not provide all the information requested in Section 111.

Prior to Award of Contract: The successful Consultant must submit a Certificate of Insurance and related endorsements that meets the City's criteria as described in the Agreement (Sample Professional Services Agreement is included as Attachment "C").

RFP Questions: Questions regarding this RFP shall be submitted through the The city's electronic procurement system (PlanetBids). The deadline to submit questions is March 18, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST.

City Contact / Kevin Tobin
Project Manager: Maintenance Services Manager
City of Laguna Niguel
Phone: (949) 362-4376
Email: [email protected]
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 3 of 27 Table of Contents
Section I - Project lnformation ......................................................................................................... 6 1-1. Project Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 1-2. City Background .................................. ............................................................................................. 6 1-3. Project Goals and Deliverables ............................................................. ........................................... 6 1-4. Scope of Services .................................................................................................................. ............ 7 1-5. Minimum Qualifications and Requirements, and Proposal Content .............. .. ....... ...................... 11 Section II - RFP Process .................................................................................................................. 12 11-1. RFP Timeline ........................... ....................................................................................................... 12 11-2 . RFP Questions and Responses ............ .......................................................................................... 13 11-3. RFP Due Date and Opening ........................................................................................................... 13 11-4. RFP Evaluation Process ................. .. .............................................................................................. 14 11-5 . Award of Contract ......................................................................................................................... 15 11-6 . Execution of Agreement ............................................................................................................... 15 11 -7. Acceptance of Agreement and Term ............................................................................................ 15 Section Ill - Proposal Form and Content ......................................................................................... 15 111-1. General Information ................................................. ... ............................ .................................... 15 111-2. Proposal Submission Requirements and Response Format ........................................................ 16 111-3 . Certification Statements .............................................................................................................. 16 111-4. Letter of Transmittal ...... ..................................................... ......................................................... 17 111-8. Itemized Cost Proposal ... ................................................................................ ............... .............. 17 111-9. Other Information .............................................................................................................. ......... , 17 Section IV- Evaluation/ Selection of Proposals ............................................................................. 17 IV-1. Clarifications ............................................................................ ....... ....................................... ...... 17 IV-2. Proposal Evaluation and Selection ................... .. ............................................... .... ...................... 17 IV-3. Multiple Contracts .......... .................................... ......................................................................... 18 Section V - General RFP Information .............................................................................................. 18 V-1. Public Records ...... ................ ......................................................................................................... 18 City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 4 of 27 V-2. Cancellation .................................................................................................................................. 18 V-3. Late Proposals ............................................................................................................................... 18 V-4. Disputes ................................................................................................................................ ........ 19 V-5. Proposer Certifications ......................................................................... ........................................ 19 V-6. Nondiscrimination ........................................................................................ .................... ............ 20 V-7. Proposed Liability .......................................................................................................................... 20 V-8. City Requests for Clarification, Additional Research, and Revisions ............................................ 20 V-9. Rejection of Proposals .................................................................................................................. 21 V-10. Modification or Withdrawal of Proposal by Consultant.. ............................................ ............... 21 V-11. Duration of Proposal ........................................................................ ........................................... 22 V-12. Local, State, and Federal Requirements .............................................. ....................................... 22 Section VI - Form to be Submitted ................................................................................................. 22 Vl-1. Certification Statement (submit with proposal) ................................................................ .... 23 Attachment A- City Bridge Location Map ...................................................................................... 24 Attachment B - CalTrans Bridge Inspection Reports ....................................................................... 26 Attachment C - Sample Professional Services Agreement ............................................................... 163 Attachment D -Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) Guidelines for Local Agencies ..... 184 City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 5 of 27

SECTION I - PROJECT INFORMATION
1-1. PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Laguna Niguel ("City") owns and maintains 17 bridges, which are located throughout the City. Caltrans has inspected 9 of the bridges and has recommended various maintenance repairs.

The City now is interested having all its bridges evaluated, see Attachment A for a location map of the City's bridges and Attachment B for the Caltrans Bridge Inspections Reports.

The City of Laguna Niguel ("City") is requesting proposals from qualified firms ("Consultant") for professional services to inspect and evaluate the City's bridges, review Caltrans' reports, and provide a detailed report of the bridges' conditions, prioritization chart for the recommended maintenance repairs, estimated costs for the repairs, and identify and apply for state or federal funding.
1-2. CITY BACKGROUND
The City of Laguna Niguel is a 14.72 square mile bedroom community with a population of approximately 67,208 located in Orange County, California. The City was incorporated on December 1, 1989, as a master planned community. The City is known for its mild coastal climate, low crime rate, and its numerous parks and public trails. Over the course of the year, the temperature typically varies from 49°F to 78°F and is rarely below 43°F or above 86°F. 1-3. PROJECT GOALS AND DELIVERABLES
To provide structural bridge inspection and related services determined to be reasonably necessary in analyzing the structural integrity and longevity of the City's bridges utilizing Caltrans' standard rating and reporting system and recommending appropriate maintenance repairs.

The City is requesting proposals from qualified firms ("Consultant") for professional services to review and analyze the condition of the City's bridges, including but not limited to: Visual Inspection, Structural Analysis, Material Testing & Non-Destructive Testing, Environmental & Corrosion Assessment, Load Testing & Monitoring, and Geotechnical & Foundation Analysis.

Caltrans' bridge inspection reports are made available in Attachment B to provide additional information on the conditions of the bridges. In addition to the review and analysis, the City is requesting a comprehensive report of each of the bridges to include conditions, prioritization chart for the recommended maintenance repairs, estimated costs for the repairs, and identify state or federal funding. Additionally, the City is requesting that the Consultant then prepare and submit the application for the identified state or federal funding opportunity(ies).

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 6 of 27 The awarded Consultant will perform the bridge inspection services as outlined in Section 1-4 (Scope of Services) and the project deliverables as listed below. The City will issue a Notice to Proceed for each bridge, based upon the available budget.

1. Attend the City's in-person project kick-off meeting.

2. Attend the City's bridge kick-off meetings, following receipt of each Notice to Proceed.

3. Attend bi-weekly virtual status meetings as well as attend monthly in-person status meetings.

4. For all bridges, provide a detailed report for each of the following:
a. Perform visual inspection analysis on all bridges to determine the overall condition, so that a prioritized list of recommended maintenance repairs from the most critical to minor can be developed.
b. Identify which of the following analyses or testing are warranted: Including but not limited to Visual Inspection, Structural Analysis, Material Testing & Non-Destructive Testing, Environmental & Corrosion Assessment, Load Testing & Monitoring, and Geotechnical & Foundation Analysis.

5. For each bridge, provide a detailed report for each of the following:
a. Conduct Inspection, testing, and condition analysis including but not limited to Visual Inspection, Structural Analysis, Material Testing & Non-Destructive Testing, Environmental & Corrosion Assessment, Load Testing & Monitoring, and Geotechnical & Foundation Analysis.
b. Provide a detailed prioritization list for the recommended maintenance repairs.
c. Provide itemized estimated costs for each of the maintenance repairs.

6. Identify and apply for all available state and federal funding opportunities.

7. Compile a comprehensive report merging all detailed reports provided herein, including the state and federal funding applications, with responses. 1-4. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The Consultant shall use the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Guidelines (attached herein as Attachment "D") in performance of the Scope of Services defined below.

B. SCOPE OF SERVICES TASKS
TASK 1: PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING AND INITIAL VISUAL INSPECTION (FOR ALL BRIDGES) Deliverable: Provide a detailed report prioritization criteria report for bridge maintenance analysis
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 7 of 27 Perform visual inspection analysis on all bridges to determine the overall condition, so that a prioritized list of recommended maintenance repairs from the most critical to minor can be developed. Identify which of the following analyses or testing are warranted: Including but not limited to Visual Inspection, Structural Analysis, Material Testing & NonDestructive Testing, Environmental & Corrosion Assessment, Load Testing & Monitoring, and Geotechnical & Foundation Analysis.

Prioritization shall be based on several applicable criteria:

1. High priority given to repair of strengthening of structural elements.

2. Medium priority given to repair of scour countermeasures, embankment erosion control and repair, and strengthening of structural elements.

3. Low priority given to minor repairs.

TASK 2: BRIDGE ASSESSMENTS (FOR EACH BRIDGE)
Deliverable: Provide a detailed report of the inspection1 testing1 and conditions analysis findings
The bridge assessments shall utilize the National Bridge Inspection Standards or Bridge Condition Index to prioritize the recommended repairs base on risk and consequence analysis, cost effectiveness, and repair feasibility.

2.1 REVIEW OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE COUNTY AND CALTRANS BRIDGE

INSPECTION REPORT
Prior to conducting the bridge inspection, the Consultant shall review the Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report (BIR). In addition to the BIR, the Consultant shall examine the bridge's as-built plans, and any other relevant records obtained from the County of Orange. It is the Consultant's responsibility to diligently research and obtain all necessary documents and information from the County of Orange.

2.2 CONDUCT FIELD INSPECTION
A. The field inspection of the bridge shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
• Visual inspection
• Non-destructive testing
• Material evaluation
• Concrete condition assessment
• Steel structure and corrosion assessment
• Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and load testing
• Verification of previously identified repairs listed in the BIRs • Applicability of special criteria, such as the bridge's significance to structural stability
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 8of27 B. The inspection shall also identify any site access limitations that may impact preventive maintenance activities. Any maintenance issues observed during the inspection that not documented in the BIRs shall be evaluated and recorded.

Additionally, the inspection shall document:
• Potential construction challenges and restrictions
• Field conditions, including staging and traffic control requirements C. In addition to the condition analysis, the inspection shall include observations and recommendations on the following for each bridge:
• Traffic control requirements
• Right-of-Way impacts and access constraints
• Potential staging areas
• Environmentally sensitive areas, impacts, and potential permit requirements • Proximity to nearby schools or businesses that may be affected by maintenance activities
• Clearance limitations
• Utility conflicts
• Potential scour issues and recommended countermeasures • Other relevant constraints
TASK 3: BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PRIORITY, MAINTENANCE SUMMARY, AND COSTS (FOR EACH BRIDGE)
Deliverable: Provide a detailed report prioritizing the maintenance repairs with detailed cost estimates.

3.1 PREVENTIVE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE AND PRIORITY SUMMARY
Field observations shall be compiled into a repair and preventive maintenance recommendation report, prioritized accordingly. This report shall include:
• All relevant documentation, condition assessments, photos, and cost estimates and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. • Provide condition assessments and preventive maintenance recommendations in accordance with the Caltrans standard rating system
• Include field notes linked to as-built plans and photos that clearly document and prioritize the necessary repairs for each bridge.

3.2 ESTIMATE PROJECT COSTS
The Consultant shall prepare a detailed construction cost estimate for each recommended repair or preventive maintenance task. For each bridge, the cost estimate shall include a comprehensive breakdown of the following:
• Labor costs
• Material costs
City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 9 of 27 • Equipment costs
Temporary traffic control items, including:
• K-rail
• Flagging
• Traffic stripe removal and replacement
• Construction area signs
• Temporary railing
TASK 4: GRANT/ FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES & APPLICATIONS
Deliverable: Provide a detailed report identifying all available state and federal funding opportunities and assist City with submitting applications.

Funding opportunities for bridges may include:
• Bridge Investment Program (BIP): The Federal Highway administration (FHWA) offers grant applications for bridges with total eligible project costs over $100 million.
• California Department of Transportation Highway Bridge Program (HBP) • California Senate Bill 1 (SBl)
• Gas Tax
• Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
• Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP): This program provides about $300 million per year in state funding for projects that improve the movement of goods along corridors with high freight volume.

Bridges eligible for funding shall be given immediate priority for application submission.

The grant/ funding requirements for approval and funding shall be compiled for all bridge repair and preventive maintenance activities.

The report shall include:
• A comprehensive list of repair and preventive maintenance needs for each bridge • Recommendations for necessary repairs
• Proposed grouping of preventive maintenance projects for efficient implementation
The Consultant shall:
• Prepare a cover letter certifying compliance with the grant/ funding guidelines, as required
• Prepare all funding applications and assist City throughout the submission and award process.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 10 of 27 TASK 5: PRIORITIZE PROJECTS (FOR ALL BRIDGES)
Deliverable: Provide compile a detailed report combining all bridge reports prioritizing the repairs, cost estimates and funding opportunities and applications Using the established procedures and criteria, the Consultant shall prepare a spreadsheet report that summarizes all relevant data for each bridge and prioritizes the repair and preventive maintenance needs.

The report shall include for each bridge:
• Relevant bridge data from the BIR
• Priority level of all maintenance repairs
• Detailed description each maintenance repair
• Estimated maintenance cost
• Maintenance repairs eligible for grant / funding opportunities (such as California Department of Transportation Highway Bridge Program (HBP) or California Department of Transportation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP)) 1-5. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS, AND PROPOSAL CONTENT A. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
Qualified Consultants who can demonstrate their ability to successfully deliver the services outlined in Section 1-4 Scope of Services of this RFP are invited to submit a proposal. Only proposals meeting the following requirements will be considered. Proposals that do not meet these requirements may be disqualified at the sole discretion of the City.

1. The Consultant must have completed at least two (2) similar projects within the last ten (10) years, providing services equivalent to those described in Section IV - Scope of Services for a government agency.

2. The Project Manager assigned to this contract must have at least five (5) years of relevant experience within the last five (5) years, delivering services similar to those detailed in Section 1-4 Scope of Services.

3. The Consultant must have sufficient staff and/or sub-consultants with experience in the required disciplines to perform the requested services.

4. The Consultant's staff and/or sub-consultants must be capable of completing and reviewing inspections as specified in Section 1-4.

5. The Consultant must demonstrate relevant local, state, or regional experience.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 11 of 27

6. The Consultant must provide at least three (3) references from clients who received similar services as those outlined in Section 1-4 Scope of Services within the last five (S) years.

7. The Consultant must have the administrative and fiscal capacity to provide and manage the proposed services.

B. PROPOSAL CONTENT
The proposal should include the following components:

1. FIRM OR PERSON INTRODUCTION: A summary detailing the firm's background, including:
• Length of time in business
• Office location(s)
• Number of staff
• Overview of qualifications, highlighting the firm's strengths, areas of expertise, and relevant licenses

2. APPROACH: A description of the firm's project management practices, methodologies, and processes.

3. PROJECT EXPERIENCE: A list of relevant project management experiences related to the required services. Include the type of work performed and client contact information for each project.

4. GRAPHICS: Examples of graphics used in previous studies to illustrate the firm's design and presentation capabilities.

5. WORK PLAN: A detailed work plan outlining the estimated hours allocated to each task or project phase.

6. KEY STAFF: Identification of the Principal-in-Charge and key staff assigned to the project. Include their qualifications and relevant experience, along with resumes demonstrating their project management expertise.

7. LITIGATION: A list of any current litigation involving the firm or individual related to their professional services, as well as a history of any such litigation in the past ten (10) years.

8. DISCLOSURE: Disclosure of any past, ongoing, or potential conflicts of interest related to performing the anticipated work.

SECTION II - RFP PROCESS
11-1. RFP Tl MELINE
The following is the anticipated RFP Timeline. The timeline is subject to change if additional time is needed. Any timeline changes will be communicated via a RFP addendum.

Milestone Date
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 12 of 27 RFP Issued February 28, 2025
Due date for RFP Questions March 18, 2025
Responses Provided to RFP Questions March 21, 2025
RFP Submittal ("RFP Due Date") March 27, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST Optional Consultant lnterview(s) -Virtual Tentatively scheduled for the week of Meeting April 7, 2025
City Council Award of Project On or about May 1, 2025
Effective date for Agreement July 1, 2025
11-2. RFP QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES
Consultants interested in submitting a proposal are asked not to contact other City staff or City Council Members in connection with the RFP prior to the City Council Award of the project.

Please upload all questions pertaining to the RFP to PlanetBids on or before March 18, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST. No questions will be accepted via phone or email. Once all questions are received, the City will summarize all questions and their responses in an addendum to the RFP. The addendum will be provided by March 21, 2025. The addendum will be posted to PlanetBids.

In case additional clarifications need to be provided after responses have been provided to RFP questions, and before the RFP Due Date, the City will post additional addenda to PlanetBids.

Each Consultant is responsible for obtaining all addenda prior to submitting a proposal and shall acknowledge in its proposal the receipt of each addendum as part of its proposal. Failure of Consultant to acknowledge receipt of all addenda as part of its proposal may result in rejection of its proposal.
11-3. RFP DUE DATE AND OPENING
Proposals are due on or before the RFP Due Date, March 27, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. PST.

Proposals will be addressed to the City Contact:

City of Laguna Niguel (City Hall)
c/o Keevin Tobin
30111 Crown Valley Parkway
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Interested Consultants shall submit a PDF copy of your proposal through PlanetBids. No hard copy City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 13 of 27 proposals will be accepted.

It is the responsibility of the Consultant to ensure the proposal was received by the RFP Due Date.

Late proposals will not be accepted. The City will not publicly open or read proposals aloud. 11-4. RFP EVALUATION PROCESS
This RFP is not a formal bid process governed by formal bid rules typically associated with public projects. The evaluation and selection process are based upon consideration of a variety of factors as described below. Accordingly, the City reserves the right to waive technical errors, alter submission dates, issue subsequent requests for proposals, etc.

An Evaluation Committee comprised of City staff, will review and score all proposals based on the Evaluation criteria stated below. The selections will be made based on the recommendation of the team and presented to the City Council for approval to award and agreement execution. The individual rating and/or evaluation forms prepared by the team members will not be revealed; however, a summary of the evaluation results will be presented to the City Council.

During the evaluation process, the Committee may, at its discretion, request any one or all Consultants to make oral presentations by participating in a virtual interview. Such presentations will provide Consultants with an opportunity to answer any questions the Committee may have on their qualification package. Not all Consultants may be asked to make such oral presentations. The interview process will primarily focus on the key personnel proposed by the Consultant to perform services for this City. The City may also request the presence of the Consultant's principal-in-charge, if necessary.

The City of Laguna Niguel will review and evaluate the proposals based on the following factors to select the most qualified Consultants:

1. Proposed Personnel - The experience and qualifications of the proposed personnel and the firm providing similar services and/or projects. Expertise and background of the proposed personnel and their availability and overall firm capabilities to meet the additional needs of the City.

2. Project Approach - The proposed project approach and services that the firm is capable of providing and the firm's approach to meet the needs of the City.

3. Project Controls - The firm's ability to control costs and provide accurate and timely invoices, stay within budget, monitor schedule, and describe the techniques used to complete projects within the proposed time frames.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 14 of 27

4. Relevant Experience and Client References

5. Fee Schedule and Cost - The proposed fee schedule and any cost proposals for project scopes of services will be evaluated based on reasonableness of the proposed rates or costs.

Rates and costs will be evaluated on those that the City or other comparable public agencies have paid for similar services, and in accordance with what is to be considered with the industry's standard and customary rates and costs for the services.

Selections by the City shall be based on demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and shall not be awarded solely based on hourly rates and/or project cost. Selections will be made to ensure that such services are engaged based on demonstrated experience and qualifications at fair and reasonable prices to the City.
11-5. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Following evaluation and rating by the City's Evaluation Committee, the City may recommend a Consultant for award at a City Council Meeting or award the contract without City Council action.

The selected Consultant will enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents of the RFP and the Consultant's proposal. Consultants not chosen will be informed following the award of contract.
11-6. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
A sample Professional Services Agreement is attached herein as an Attachment "C". The term of the Agreement will begin once the Agreement is fully executed, and a W9 and a certificate of insurance and related insurance endorsements that meet the City's requirements have been received and approved.
11-7. ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT AND TERM
After the City Council awards the project, the City intends to work to fully execute the Professional Services Agreement (Sample Professional Services Agreement is included as Attachment "C"). The term of the Professional Services Agreement will be for one (1) year, or until the RFP Scope of Work (Section 1-4) is completed.

SECTION Ill - PROPOSAL FORM AND CONTENT
111-1. GENERAL INFORMATION
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CllYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 15 of 27 The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted. Submission of a proposal indicates Consultant's acceptance of the conditions contained in this RFP, unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the agreement between the City and the selected Consultants.

The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, in whole or part, to waive any informality in any proposal, and to accept the proposal which, in its discretion, is in the best interest of the City.

Any Consultant may withdraw their proposal, without obligation, at any time prior to the RFP Due Date. A withdrawal will not be effective unless made personally in writing to the City Contact prior to the RFP Due Date. Proposals may later be referred to the City Council for appropriate action.

Proposals must be valid for a minimum of 90 days.
111-2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSE FORMAT Consultant is responsible for preparing a well-organized and concise written proposal. Emphasis should be on completeness, clarity of content, and cost effectiveness of the rates and project proposal(s). Consultant should provide sufficient documentation to allow the City to assess the firm's general capabilities as they would apply to the City of Laguna Niguel and to evaluate specific responses to each project scope of services.

To be considered for selection, Consultants must submit a complete response to this RFP that includes all information requested in 1-5. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS, AND PROPOSAL CONTENT and/or requirements in the following format and order. Failure to provide any of the information requested may be cause for the proposal to be considered non-responsive.

1. Certification Statement

2. Letter of Transmittal

3. Work Approach and Draft Project Schedule

4. Experience

5. Key Personnel

6. Itemized Cost Proposal

7. Other Information
Additional guidelines for the mandatory information and/or requirements listed above are described in the next sections. Although there is no page limit on this proposal, please provide brief, concise, relevant information that best pertains to service categories or project scope. Emphasis should be placed on the proposed personnel and their experience relative to the proposed services.

Services performed years ago by personnel no longer with the firm is not necessary to include. 111-3. CERTIFICATION STATEMENTS
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 16 of 27 All submitted proposals must contain a signed certification statement (see Section Vl-1).

Additionally, Consultant shall affirmatively state that they have reviewed and are ready to execute the City's standard form Professional Services Agreement (Sample Professional Services Agreement is included as Attachment "C") in its Letter of Transmittal. 111-4. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
All proposals must include a cover letter addressed to the City's Project Manager and signed by a duly constituted official legally authorized to bind the Consultant to its proposal including the fee schedule and any project(s) scope(s) of services costs. The cover letter must include the legal name of company, corporate address and the name, address, phone number, and email address of the Consultant's main point of contact (to whom the City should direct correspondence). Consultant shall affirmatively state that they have reviewed and are ready to execute the City's standard form Professional Services Agreement (Sample Professional Services Agreement is included as Attachment "C") and acknowledge receipt of all RFP addenda. Additionally, Consultant shall identify the proposed service categories of interest and key individuals who will be involved in providing the services to the City.
111-8. ITEMIZED COST PROPOSAL
Provide an itemized cost proposal to provide the tasks described in the Scope of Work outlined in this RFP.
111-9. OTHER INFORMATION
Provide additional information to help the City's review team evaluate your proposal in comparison to the proposal(s) submitted by other Consultant(s).

SECTION IV - EVALUATION/ SELECTION OF PROPOSALS
IV-1. CLARIFICATIONS
The City reserves the right to seek written clarification of each proposal submitted. The City also reserves the right to require other evidence of minimum qualifications, technical, managerial, financial, or other abilities prior to selection.

IV-2. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION
City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 17 of27 The City will select a Consultant based on the evaluation of the submitted proposals. The City reserves the right to request a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) from the top ranked Consultants. The City will recommend award of contract to the highest ranked and responsive Consultants.

IV-3. MULTIPLE CONTRACTS
The City will award only one Consultant to provide all services described in the Scope of Work in this RFP (Section 1-4). If multiple Consultant's desire to work together, one Consultant will enter a contract with the City and agree upon a method of compensation with the other Consultant(s}, separate from the City.

SECTION V - GENERAL RFP INFORMATION
V-1. PUBLIC RECORDS
Responses to this RFP become the exclusive property of the City and are subject to the California Public Records Act. Those elements in each proposal which are trade secrets as that term is defined in California Civil Code section 3426.l(d) or otherwise exempt by law from disclosure and which are prominently marked as "TRADE SECRET", "CONFIDENTIAL", or "PROPRIETARY" may not be subject to disclosure. The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records including, without limitation, those so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by an order of the Court. Consultants who indiscriminately identify all or most of their proposal as exempt from disclosure without justification may be deemed non-responsive.

In the event the City is required to defend an action on a Public Records Act request for any of the contents of a proposal marked "confidential", "proprietary", or "trade secret", the Consultant agrees, upon submission of its proposal for City's consideration, to defend and indemnify the City from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, if any action or liability arising under the Public Records Act.

V-2. CANCELLATION
The City reserves the right to cancel this RFP or the contract award, at any time before execution of the contract by both parties, if cancellation is deemed to be in the best interest of the City. In no event shall the City have any liability for the cancellation of a contract award.

V-3. LATE PROPOSALS
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 18 of 27 All proposals that are not received by the RFP Due Date will not be considered and will not be returned to the Consultant.

V-4. DISPUTES
In case of any doubt or differences of opinion as to the items or services to be furnished hereunder, or the interpretation of the provisions of this RFP, the decision of the City shall be final and binding upon all parties.

V-5. PROPOSER CERTIFICATIONS
By the act of submitting a Proposal in response to this RFP, the Proposer certifies that:

1. The Consultant has carefully examined all RFP documents, including the Sample Agreement (attached as Attachment "C"), and all addenda, and fully understands the intention and services requested in the RFP, and the proposal is made in accordance therewith. Except as otherwise noted as part of the proposal, the Consultant certifies that Consultant is ready, willing, and able to comply with all terms of the attached Agreement.

2. The Consultant is familiar with the local conditions under which the services will be performed.

3. The proposal is based upon the requirements described in the RFP, without exception, unless clearly stated in the response.

4. The Consultant accepts all of the terms of the City's Agreement and warrants that Consultant will fully meet all of the insurance requirements contained therein. If the Consultant wishes to amend or modify any terms of the Agreement, such amendment or modification must be stated in particularity in the Proposal. Proposed changes to the Agreement not stated at the time of proposal submission will not be considered. Changes stated will be considered but may not be agreed upon by the City for contract award. If the City does not agree with such noted changes, the Consultant may withdraw the proposed change, or the entire proposal and the City may elect to award the contract to the next highest ranked Consultant.

5. The Consultant certifies, and in the case of sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation, each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, under penalty of perjury, that to the best of Consultant's knowledge and belief, no elected official, employee, or person whose salary is payable, in whole or in part, by the City has a direct or indirect financial interest in the proposal or in the services to which it relates, or in any of the profits thereof, other than as fully described in the Consultant's response to this RFP.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 19 of 27

6. The Consultant has examined all parts of the RFP, including all requirements and contract terms and conditions thereof, and if its proposal is accepted, the Consultant shall accept the contract documents thereto, unless substantive changes are made in same without the approval of the Consultant.

7. The Consultant, if an individual, is of lawful age; is the only one interested in this proposal; and no person, firm, or corporation, other than that named, has any interest in the proposal, or in the proposed Agreement.

8. The Consultant has quality experience providing the types of services and duties as described within the Scope of Services and Project Scopes of Services of this RFP.

9. The Consultant shall also certify Consultant's state of residence.

V-6. NONDISCRIMINATION
By the act of submitting a proposal in response to this RFP, the Consultant certifies, under penalty of perjury, that the Consultant has not discriminated against minorities, women, or emerging small business enterprises, or a business enterprise that is owned or controlled by or that employs a disabled veteran, in obtaining any required subcontracts.

V-7. PROPOSED LIABILITY
Consultants responding to this RFP do so solely at their expense, and the City is not responsible for any Consultant expenses associated with the RFP. By proposing, Consultants agree that doing so is at their own risk and the City shall have no liability related thereto. Finalists invited to participate in interview evaluations are responsible for scheduling and paying for their own travel arrangements. The City is not liable for any cost incurred by a Consultant in protesting any portion of the RFP documents or the City's selection decision.

V-8. CITY REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION, ADDITIONAL RESEARCH, AND REVISIONS The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any portion of a proposal or to obtain additional information necessary to properly evaluate a particular proposal. Failure of a Consultant to timely respond to such a request for additional information or clarification may result in a finding that the Consultant is non-responsive and consequent rejection of the proposal.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CllYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page ZO of 27 The City may obtain information from any legal source for clarification of any proposal. The City need not inform the Consultant of any intent to perform additional research in this respect or of any information thereby received.

The City may perform, at its sole option, investigations of any Consultant. Information may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, current litigation and contracting references. All such documents, if requested by the City, become part of the public record and may be disclosed accordingly.

The City reserves the right to request revisions of any proposal after the date and time due and before award for the purpose of obtaining best and final offers.

V-9. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City reserves the right to reject any or all irregularities or omissions in proposals submitted in response to this RFP to the extent it is determined to be in the best interest of the City to do so.

Furthermore, the City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or portions thereof submitted in response to this RFP. Proposals may be rejected for one or more of the following reasons, including but not limited to:

1. Failure of the Consultant to adhere to one or more of the provisions established in the RFP.

2. Failure of the Consultant to submit a proposal in the format specified herein.

3. Failure of the Consultant to submit a proposal within the time requirements established herein.

4. Failure of the Consultant to adhere to ethical and professional standards before, during, or following the proposal process.

The City may reject any proposal not in compliance with all prescribed public procurement procedures and requirements and may reject for good cause any or all proposals upon a finding by the City that it is in the public interest to do so. Rejected proposals are considered to be nonresponsive.

V-10. MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL BY CONSULTANT A proposal may not be modified, withdrawn, or canceled by the Consultant following the time and date the proposals are due (RFP Due Date). Proposals submitted early may be modified or withdrawn only by notice to the City at the proposal submittal location prior to the time and date the proposals are due. Such notice shall be submitted to the Project Manager, by email, sent by a duly authorized representative of the Consultant submitting the proposal. All such communication shall be worded so as not to reveal the contents of the original proposal. Withdrawn proposals may City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page21 of27 be resubmitted prior to the time and date the proposals are due, provided that they are then fully in conformance with the RFP.

V-11. DURATION OF PROPOSAL
Proposal prices, terms, and conditions shall be firm for a period of at least ninety (90) days from the time and date proposals are due. Proposals shall not be subject to future price escalation or changes of terms during the ninety (90) day period.

V-12. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
The City intends to select Consultants in accordance with California law and the City's municipal code. Selection of Consultants under this process is not a guarantee of a contract award, nor is the award of a contract for any portion of the project a guarantee of award of a contract for any subsequent services. All services are subject to budgetary and funding constraints of the City.

The selected Consultants shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, executive orders, and ordinances applicable to the services under the Agreement, including, without limitation, the provisions of: (i) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (ii) Section V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (iii) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; (iv) all regulations and administrative rules established pursuant to the foregoing laws; and (v) all other applicable requirements of federal and state civil rights and rehabilitation statutes, rules, and regulations.

SECTION VI - FORM TO BE SUBMITTED
Please complete and submit the following form as part of your proposal:

Vl-1. Certification Statement
(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENT/ONA LL Y LEFT BLANK}
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 22 of27 Vl-1. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (SUBMIT WITH PROPOSAL)
This certification statement is provided in response to the City of Laguna Niguel's RFP titled:

Citywide Structural Bridge Inspection Services
All proposals must include this certification statement, signed by a duly constituted official legally authorized to bind the Consultant to its proposal, fee schedule and project scope cost schedules.

1. Proposal may be released in total as public information in accordance with the requirements of the laws covering the same. Any proprietary information has been clearly marked.

2. Proposal and cost schedule shall be valid and binding for ninety (90) days following the proposal due date or any revised proposal submission date, whichever is later, and will become part of the contract that is negotiated with the City.

3. The Consultant has not and will not discriminate against a subcontractor in the awarding of a subcontract because the subcontractor is a minority, woman, or emerging small business enterprise.

4. The Consultant certifies that this proposal has been arrived at independently and has been submitted without collusion designed to limit independent bidding or competition.

5. The Consultant has not had any communication with a City Council member in relation to their proposal. If so, Consultant will provide a copy of such communication for the public record.

6. The Consultant has never been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or safety regulation.

Consultant's Signature Date
Print Name Title
Consultant's Federal Taxpayer Identification Number:

City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 23 of 27

ATTACHMENT A - CITY BRIDGE LOCATION MAP
(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 24 of27 I

ATTACHMENT B - CALTRANS BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS
• ATTACHMENT B(l): 55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) • ATTACHMENT 8(2): 55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH
• ATTACHMENT 8(3): 55C0281 OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY) • ATTACHMENT 8(4): 55C0496 SULFUR CREEK
• ATTACHMENT 8(5): 55C0497 SALT CREEK SERVICE ROAD TUNNEL • ATTACHMENT 8(6): 55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH
• ATTACHMENT 8(7): 55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH
• ATTACHMENT 8(8): 55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC
• ATTACHMENT 8(9): 55C0695 EQUESTRIAN UNDERPASS MUOLTON PKWY
(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP- CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page ZS of 27 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations • lbJtrang

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME: INSPECTION DATE:
55C0037 050 CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) June 17, 2022

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION

1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY
0 33°33'51.96"
(7) FACILITY CARRIED
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
(5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)

CAMINO CAPISTRANO

OSO CREEK
ON 150000000
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE 117°40'26.32" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
7 GOOD DECK AREA (M)2 381
7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 45.1
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE (11 3)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (06/17/2022) Routine-Elevation View (06/17/2022) ~llfll"'-,:-l'IIF f1
EI
Routine-Underside View (06/17/2022) Routine-Map View (06/17/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L. Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.WongsavanhNL.Dang
12/1/2022
Vinh-duc L. Dang (Registered c· Date
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 1 of 7 55C0037 /AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO
8) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO

MO A) N/A
MO 8) N/A
(21) MAINTAIN C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MOC) N/A
(22) OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE N/A
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1938 (45) MAIN SPANS 6 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT (106) YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46) APPR SPANS 0 (43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 01 : SLAB (34) SKEW 45 (48) MAX SPAN (M) 8.5 (44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE (49) LENGTH (M) 39 (35) STR FLARE 0-NO (44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE (112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS 0 NO. OF HINGES 0

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
Six span continuous CIP/RC slab supported by RC pile bents (5 each) and cantilever end span with RC diaphragm abutments.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(S) 8.00 ft, 4 @ 28.00 ft, 8.00 ft (N )

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31)DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64)OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS
0 UNKNOWN (65) CALC METHOD
RF=0.66 =>21.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1.10 =>35.6 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

OVERLAY THICKNESS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
3 inches

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads
Type 3 Legal
Type 3S2 Legal
Type 3-3 Legal
Speed 40
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 06/07 /17
Load Rating Type Assigned no plans
Load Rating Tool - Date None - 06/07 /17
Posting
Signs
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons

N/A MPH

PERMIT RATING
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
00000

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 2 of 7 55C0037 /AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance with SM&/ policy and procedures. The bridge deck was inspected by walking along the shoulders of the structure. The superstructure and substructure were inspected by walking under the structure.

There was water under all bridge spans over the channel. Spans 2 and 5 had stagnant pools of water up to 1 inch deep with algae.

Spans 3 and 4 had stagnant water coming from upstream and continuing downstream. The water in Spans 3 and 4 was up to 2 inches deep and with algae and grass growing in the waterway. •

DECK AND ROADWAY
The approach AC is cracked at the joint where the bridge begins and ends. The northerly roadway approach has settled approximately 1 inch.

SUBSTRUCTURE
About 75% of the column heights are covered by steel plates. Only the top 25% of the columns can be observed.

WATERWAY
The channel is concrete lined along the walls and invert. About 300 feet upstream (easterly), the concrete lining ends. The channel beyond is earthen with rock rip rap.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(W) 0.67 ft br, 1.50 ft cu, 26.33 ft, 1.50 ft br, 0.67 ft br (E)

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 39.0 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH
(52) TOTAL WIDTH

8.0 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET

9.3 M (13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 0.5 M RIGHT 0.5 M (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS (32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 11.3 M (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 17-COLLECTOR URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 2 CLOSED MED W/O BARRIER (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION (101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE 1-CIP CONCRETE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
6-BITUMINOUS
0-NONE
0-NONE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 3 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 5800
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT % 5 %
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 199 KM
(114) FUTURE ADT
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
7802
2044
5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prot Defect
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 8.0 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACE
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
(28a) LANES 2
SPEED
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
40 N/A
(58) DECK RATING= 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty
3 of 7 55C0037/AAAN/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prat Defect
38 1080
1130
510
Slab-RC
Delamination!Spallf Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck Wearing Surface-Asphalt
3220 Cracking-AC (WS)
(38-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Env Total
2 2
2 2
2 Qty
363
4 2
312
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
(58) DECK RATING= 7
Units Qty in each Condition State
sq.m
sq.m
cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
359
0 2
311
0 3
3 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Span 5 has a spall in the soffit that is about 14 inches in diameter and 2 inches deep with exposed rebar under one of the utility brackets near Bent 5 at the westerly edge (1 square foot CS 3). Refer to Photo 6.

Span 3 has a 1 foot long by 5 inches wide unsound concrete patch in the soffit near Bent 3 at the westerly edge. At the end of this unsound area next to Bent 3 is a spall that is 4 inches in diameter and 1 inch deep with exposed rebar. The rebar has surface rust but does not appear to have any section loss (1 square foot CS 2, 1 square foot CS 3). Refer to Photo 10.

Span 5 has a 6 inch diameter area in the soffit with honeycombing over the northerly channel wall at the bridge centerline (1 square foot CS 2). Refer to Photo 5.
(38-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The soffit in Span 5 has longitudinal cracks between 0.012 inches to 0.05 inches wide around the bridge centerline spanning an estimated length of 20 feet (20 square feet CS 2).
(38-510-3220) Cracking-AC (WS)
The AC overlay has a longitudinal crack that is about 10 feet long and 0.25 inches wide located over Span 3 and Span 4 (10 square feet CS 2).

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code O (36b) Transition 0 (36c) Appr Guardrail O (36d) Appr Guardrail End O Roadway Speed 40 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
331 Railing-RC 2 78 m 76 0 2 0
1080 Delamination!Spallf Patched Area 2 0 0 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 0 0 0
7000 Damage 2 0 0 0
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
The right rail at the northerly end is spalled with exposed rebar due to vehicular impact. The spall is approximately 24 inches by 6 inches by 2 inches deep and located at near the rail end block (1 foot CS 3). The rebar has surface rust with no measurable section loss. Refer to Photo 8.
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Both the southerly and northerly ends of the right rail curb is cracked. The cracks are greater than 1 inch wide and propagate from the rail (2 feet CS 3).

The right rail has a horizontal crack in the second rail column from the northerly end. The crack is 0.06 inches wide on average (1 foot CS 3).

Refer to Photos 7 and 8.
(331-7000) Damage
Refer to the 331-1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area defect.

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 4 of 7 55C0037/AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC rectangular.
5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE
NIA
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE N/A

0.0 M
M

0.0 M
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect . - Qty CS '.I CS 2......_______CS 3..___CSA 205 Column-RC 2 25 each 25 0 0 0
(205) Column-RC
The tops of the columns at Bents 3, 4, and 5 are partially exposed. Bents 2 and 6 have hidden columns that cannot be visually inspected.
227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0
(227) Pile-RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 234 Pier Cap-RC 2 70 m 69 1 0 0
1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 1 0 1 0 0
(234-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Pier Cap 3 has minor cracking less than 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence stains at the easterly edge (1 foot CS 2).

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 5 of 7 55C0037 /AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1
Span 2 underside looking easterly from inside the channel.

Photo 3
Span 4 underside looking easterly from inside the channel.

Photo 5
Span 5 soffit honeycombing around centerline over the
northerly channel wall.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
' Photo 2
Span 3 underside looking easterly from inside the channel. ff.

Span 5 underside looking westerly from inside the channel.

Photo 6
Span 5 soffit edge spall at the westerly edge near Bent 5, looking easterly.
6 of 7 55C0037/AAAN/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 7 Photo 8
Cracks on the right rail at the northerly end. Crack on the bottom of the right rail at the northerly end.

Photo 9 Photo 10
Cracks in the AC at the northerly end of the deck. Unsound concrete and spa II at the westerly edge of Span 3

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 05/01/2018
Status PROPOSED
Work By
Action

LOCAL AGENCY
Railing-Repair
near Bent 3.

Est Cost
Sir Target ROUTINE
Dist Target
EA
Repair the spall in the right rail. Due to vehicular impact, there is a 24 inches by 6 inches spall with exposed rebar at the northerly end of the easterly bridqe rail.

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 10/07/2010
Status PROPOSED
Work By
Action
Repair the spalls in the soffit of the slab.

LOCAL AGENCY
Super-Patch spalls
Est Cost
StrTarget ROUTINE
Dist Target
EA
Span 5 has a spa II in the soffit that is about 14 inches in diameter and 2 inches deep with exposed re bar under one of the utility brackets near Bent 5 at the westerly edge.

Note: This work item reviewed by CSW in 2022 and is still required.

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM
-NONE
-NONE

Page 7 of 7 ends

55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Photo #1
Span 2 underside looking easterly from inside the channel.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Span 3 underside looking easterly from inside the channel Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Photo #3
Span 4 underside looking easterly from inside the channel, Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55CD037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1 3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Photo #4
Span 5 underside looking westerly from inside the channel.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
SSC0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1,3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Span 5 soffit honeycombing around centerline over the northerly channel wall.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0037 0S0 CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1,3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Span 5 soffit edge spa// at the westerly edge near Bent 5, looking easterly.

Jun 17. 2022 [AAAN]
55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1,3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Pl1010 #7
Cracks on 1he right rail at the northerly end,
Jun 17 2022 [AAAN)
5SC0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Crack on the bottom of the right rail at the nor1herly end Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN)
55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1,3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Cracks in the AC at the northerly end of the deck.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN)
55C0037 OSO CREEK (CAMINO CAPISTRANO) 1.3 Ml N OF AVERY PARKWAY 133 - Unclassified
Photo #10
Unsound concrete and spall at the westerly edge of Span 3 near Bent 3.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations • lilJtTrJns

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0166
STRUCTURE NAME:

CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
100 FT W/0 ROUTE 5
0 33°33'30.06"
(7) FACILITY CARRIED
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
(5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
INSPECTION DATE:

February 19, 2022

CROWN VALLEY PKWY

SCRRA,BNSF RY,AMTRAK,ETC
ON 150000000
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE 117°40'29.72" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
5FAIR
7GOOD
DECK AREA (M)2

SUFFICIENCY RATING
3,132

78.8 7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR N NOT OVER WATERWAY

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (05/20/2020)
- t • - ,, ,. -
Routine-Underside View (05/20/2020)
TEAM LEADER Ashraf Shenouda
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.Wongsavanh/A.Shenouda
Printed on Thursd ay 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page
Routine-Elevation View (05/20/2020)
:,
Routine-Map View (03/30/2022)
5/26/2022
Date
1 of 8 55C0166/AAAM/77817
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & lnvesl1gations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

INSPECTION INFORMATION
(2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
(3) COUNTY CODE
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER
CALIFORNIA 069
12 (55)0RANGE
(39248) LAGUNA NIGUEL
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE N/A
N/A (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1970 (45) MAIN SPANS
(106) YEAR MODIFIED 2013 (46) APPR SPANS
4 0
(34) SKEW 22 (48) MAX SPAN (M) 20.1
(49) LENGTH (M) 68.3 (35) STR FLARE 0-NO
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS 2

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
(90) INSPECTION DATE 02/22 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A

B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
NO. OF HINGES 0
Original (1966): Four-span continuous CIP/RC T-beam (5) on RC two-column bents and seated abutments, all supported on concrete piles except Bents 3 and 4 which are supported on concrete bearing caisson foundations.

Widening (1978): Four-span continous CIP/PS concrete box girder (8-cells) supported by RC five-column bentsm and RC diaphragm abutments all supported on concrete piles

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(W) 45.06 ft, 2 @ 66.00 ft, 45.06 ft (E)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64) OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS
Existing
6 MS18(HS20)+MOD (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.16 =>37 .6 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1 .92 =>62.2 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
0 inches
Posting

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads Ordinance/Order Signs
Type 3 Legal N/A
Type 3S2 Legal N/A
Type 3-3 Legal N/A
Speed 40 N/A
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 10/12/2010
Load Rating Type Calculated
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS - 01/30/78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
MPH
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF R-RAILROAD 1.5 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF R-RAILROAD 7.24 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENT ARY
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02: 04 PM Page 2 of 8 55C0166/AAAM/77817 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance with SM&I policy and procedures. The bridge deck was inspected by walking along the deck. The superstructure and substructure were inspected by walking under the structure and with the aid of binoculars.

MISCELLANEOUS
There is an erosion gulley approximately 150 cubic feet in volume and located at the northwest quadrant near the wingwall. See Photo 8.

DECK AND ROADWAY
The original deck does not have approach slabs nor joint seals. The widened deck has structural approach slabs and joint seals. See Photos 1, 2, 3, and 4.

SUBSTRUCTURE
There are full height walls at Bents 3 and 4 placed later for seismic reinforcement and are not considered to be pier wall elements. The columns are the only substructure elements coded for this bridge. Some of these walls exhibits diagonal or horizontal cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and up to 20 feet long.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(S) 1.00 ft br, 5.00 ft sw, 143.34 ft, 1.00 ft br (N)

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 68.3 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 1-PART OF NET
(52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK

43.7 M

45.8 M
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 0.0 M

43.7 M
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE 000000000000
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
0 NO MEDIAN (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE
1-CIP CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION 0-NONE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 57000
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2013 (109) TRUCK ADT % 5 %
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 43.7 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
(114) FUTURE ADT
5 KM (28a) LANES 9
40 N/A
105024 SPEED
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2044 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING= 5 Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 3 of 8 55C0166/AAAM/77817 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING= 5 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 cs 3 CS4
16 Top Flange-RC 2 3128 sq.m 1564 1095 469 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 1564 0 1095 469 0
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are several short longitudinal cracks along the joint where the bridge was widened. Approximately half of the original deck has map pattern cracking less than 0.05 inches wide. Approximately a quarter of the new widened deck has map pattern cracking less than 0.05 inches wide. Overall about 35% of the deck has cracks less than 0.05 inches wide (CS 2).

The original deck has transverse cracks up to 25 feet long x 4 feet wide in size and wider than 0.05 inches spaced as far as 3 feet apart above the supports. There is a transverse crack at the left (north) shoulder greater than 0.05 inches and approximately 5 feet long (see Photos 5 and 6). Approximately 15% of the overall deck has cracks wider than 0.05 inches (CS 3).

DECK PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 5 Photo 6
Deck defects, typical CS 3 transverse crack along northerly shoulder

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code (36b) Transition 0 (36c) Appr Guardrail 0 (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 40 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
302 Joint-Compression Seal 2 28 m 28 0 0
(302) Joint-Compression Seal
The compression seals at the approach and departure slabs are located only at eastbound lanes 3 to 6 along the widened portion.

There were no significant defects noted.
321
1130
Approach Slab-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
(321) Approach Slab-RC
2 2
90 30
sq.m 60
0 30
30 The approach and departure slabs are located only at eastbound lanes 3 to 6 along the widened portion. (321-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
0 0
0 0
0 There are numerous transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches in width and spaced at 12 inches on average throughout all bridge approach and departure slabs affecting about 33% of the slabs (CS 2).

Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 4 of 8 55C0166/AAAM/77817 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Pro! Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
331 Railing-RC 2 69 m 69 0 0 0
(331) Railing-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
333 Railing-Other 2 69 m 68 0 0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 0 0 0
(333-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
The north rail exhibits a 3 inches long x 2 inches wide x 1 inch deep spall with exposed rebar at mid-span 3 (1 foot CS 2).

JOINT/RAIL PHOTOGRAPHS
Westbound departure
Photo 3
Eastbound departure

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total
No. Prot Defect Qty
104 Box Girder-PS Cone. 2 136
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 5 of 8
Westbound approach
Eastbound approach
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7
Units Qty in each Condition State
cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
m 136 0 0 0
55C0166/AAAMi77817
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem DefecV Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
(104) Box Girder-PS Cone.

There were no significant defects noted.
110 Girder/Beam-RC
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
There were no significant defects noted.

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 4-HIGHWA Y-RAILROAD
2 341 m 341
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL
(111) PIER PROTECTION
0 0 0
N: NOT APPLICABLE
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N/A
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
3 INTOLERABLE - CORRECT

N NOT APPLICABLE

N N/A (NBI)

N NOT OVER WATERWAY
N/A
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR
(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
None.

ROADWAY DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(5a) POSITION:

ROADWAY NAME:
(5d) ROUTE
2 ONE ROUTE UNDER

CAMINO CAPISTRANO NBI UNDER RECORD
(11) POST MILE
(5b) KIND HIGHWAY
(5c) LEVEL SERVICE
(10) VERTICAL CLEAR (m)
(47) HORIZONTAL CLEAR (m)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH
(102) DIRECTION TRAFFIC
00000 (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
0 (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS
5 CITY STREET (100) DEFENSE HWY
0 NONE OF THE BELOW (110) NATIONAL TRUCK NETWORK

7.62 (20) TOLL FACILITY
11 .60 (28b) LANES
99 (29) RECENT ADT
2 2-WAY TRAFFIC (109) TRUCK % ADT

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 NOT NHS
16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL
0 NOT DEF HWY
0 NOT PART OF NATL NETWO
3 ON FREE ROAD
2 5800 (30) ADT YEAR
5 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7
2019
Elem DefecV Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No Prat Defect Qty r.s 1 c.s ? r-cc:: 3 r e:: 4
205 Column-RC 2 21 each 11 10 0 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 10 0 10 0 0
(205-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Half the columns have minor transverse cracks up to 0.012 inches (CS 2). 215 Abutment-RC 2 100 m 99 1 0 0
1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 1 0 1 0 0
(215-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
There is a full height vertical crack less than 0.05 inches wide with white effloressence staining located around the centerline of the widened westerly abutment (1 foot CS 2).
227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0
Printed on: Thursda y 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 6 of 8 55C0166/AAAM/77817 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structu re Maintenance & Investigations

SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Pro! Defect Qty r.s 1 r:s ? r.s <! r:s .d
(227) Pile-RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. 234 Pier Cap-RC 2 70 m 70 0 0 0
(234) Pier Cap-RC
There were no significant defects noted.

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 7 Photo 8
Utilities in Bays 2 and 3, facing the westerly abutment Erosion gully at the northwesterly quadrant Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 7 of 8 55C0 166/ AAAM/77 817 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 04/24/2006 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Meth acrylate
Clean and seal the entire deck cracks with methacrylate.

Est Cost
Str Target 2 YEARS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Dist Target
EA
There are several short longitudinal cracks along the joint where the bridge was widened. Approximately half of the original deck has map pattern cracking less than 0.05 inches wide. Approximately an quarter of the new widened deck has map pattern cracking less than 0.05 inches wide.

The original deck has transverse cracks up to 25 feet L x 4 feet Win size and wider than 0.05 inches spaced as far as 3 feet apart above the supports. There is a transverse crack at the left (north) shoulder greater than 0.05 inches and approximately 5 feet long (see Photos 5 and 6).

Note: This work item was reviewed by CSW in 2022 and is still reouired.

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
RecDate 05/01/2018
Status PROPOSED
Repair rail spalls.

Work By
Action

LOCAL AGENCY
Railing-Repair
Est Cost
Str Target 2 YEARS
The north rail exhibits a 3 inches x 2 inches x 1 inch spall with exposed rebar at mid-span 3.

RecDate 05/01/2018
Status PROPOSED
Work By
Action

LOCAL AGENCY
Appr. Slab-Overlay o
Place Methacrylate resin on all bridge approach and departure slabs.

Est Cost
Str Target 2 YEARS
DistTarget
EA
Dist Target
EA
There are numerous transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches in width and spaced at 12 inches on average throughout all bridge approach and departure slabs.

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 02/19/2022 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Bridge-Misc
Backfill erosion gulley at the northwest quadrant of the bridge.

Est Cost
Sir Target 2 YEARS
Approximately 150 cubic feet or more of soil has eroded from the northwest slope. See Photo 8.

Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 02:04 PM Page 8 of 8
Dist Target
EA
55C0166/AAAM/77817
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W!O ROUTE 5
500 - Approach
Wes1bou11d depar1u re
Mai 30, 2022 [AAAlvl j
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT \/\J;O ROUTE 5 Mar 30, 2022 [MAM) 500 - Approach
..---------------== ..

Westbound approacl1
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 1 DO FT W/O ROUTE 5
500 - Approach
Photo #3
Eastbound departure
Mar 30, 2022 [MAM]
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W/O ROUTE 5
500 - Approacl1
Eastbound approacI1
l'vl ar 30 2022 [MAl'vl]
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W/O ROUTE 5
102 - Deck-Damage/Deterioration
Deck defects, typical
Mar 30, 2022 [MAM]
SSC0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W/O ROUTE 5
102 - Deck-Damage/Deterioration
Photo #6
CS 3 transverse crack along northerly shoulder
Mar 30, 2022 [AAAM]
l
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W/O ROUTE 5
503 - Utility/Encroachment
Photo #7
Utilities in Bays 2 and 3. racing the westerly abutment Mar 30, 2022 [AAAM]
55C0166 CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY OH 100 FT W/O ROUTE 5
501 - Drainage
Erosion gully at the northwesterly quadrant
Mar 30, 2022 [AAAM)
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance
• lb/trans
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0281
BRIDGE iNSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
STRUCTURE NAME:

OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY)

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE

0.2 Ml W OF 1-5 (7) FACILITY CARRIED
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
33°33'27.22" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
117°40'35.9" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEAL TH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK 7 GOOD
?GOOD
DECK AREA (M)2

SUFFICIENCY RATING
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
ON
INSPECTION DATE:

June 17, 2022

CROWN VALLEY PKWY

OSO CREEK
150000000

ROUTE ON NHS
916
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 47.3
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 4 MINIMUM TOLERABLE (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (06/17/2022) Routine-Elevation View (06/17/2022) . - - 15> ---= ~
.;.___:n=::;;;;:;;;;;;:~===.,._,==---=-:;. , -
Routine-Underside View (06/17/2022) Routine-Map View (06/17/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L. Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.Wongsavanh/VL.Dang
12/1/2022
Date
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 1 of 7 55C0281 /AAAL/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME CALIFORNIA 069
12 (55)ORANGE
(39248) LAGUNA NIGUEL
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(90) INSPECTION DATE 06/22 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
(2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
(3) COUNTY CODE
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A
(4) PLACE CODE B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1963 (45) MAIN SPANS
(106) YEAR MODIFIED 2013 (46) APPR SPANS
(34) SKEW 0 (48) MAX SPAN (M)
(49) LENGTH (M) 22.9 (35) STR FLARE
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
N/A
N/A
1 0

21.9 0-NO
0 C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR
NO. OF HINGES

N-NO MOC) N/A
5: PRESTRESS CONC
05: BOX BEAM OR GDR - MU
0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
0 Original (1963): Single span PC/PS concrete box gider units (11 units) supported on RC seat type abutments and concrete piles.

Widening (1972, to the north): Single span CIP/PS concrete box girder (10 cells) and open end RC diaphragm abutments supported on concrete piles.

Widening (2013, to the south): Single span RC T-girders (4 girders) with corrugated metal stay-in-place forms and open end RC diaphragm abutments supported on concrete piles.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(W) 72.00 ft (E)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64) OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS
Existing
0 UNKNOWN (65) CALC METHOD
RF=0.54 =>17.5 metric tons (63)CALC METHOD
RF=0.90 =>29.2 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
3 inches
Posting

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads Ordinance/Order Signs
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Speed
Legal
Legal
Legal
40 Posting Date NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 10/12/2010
Load Rating Type Assigned no plans
Load Rating Tool - Date BOS - 10/12/10
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons

N/A MPH
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
xxxxx

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 2 of 7 55C0281/AAAU87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance with SM&I policy and procedures. The bridge deck was inspected by walking along the shoulders and sidewalks. The superstructure and substructure were inspected by walking under the structure.

There was water up to 2 feet deep in the channel. There was light vegetation, mostly consisting of algea, growing in the waterway on the grouted rock channel bed.

DECK AND ROADWAY
The westbound departure has settled about 1 inch resulting in cracks on the AC roadway pavement near the end of the bridge.

There are traffic loop detectors in both of the eastbound left turn lanes on the bridge. There are traffic loop detectors in the through lanes off of the bridge just before the intersection of Crown Valley Pkwy and Forbes Rd .

SUPERSTRUCTURE
The utility box cover underneath the structure is deteriorated, exposing the utilities. The cover has fallen onto the westerly abutment slope in the channel. Refer to Photo 5.

The southerly T-girder portion of the bridge has corrugated metal forms that prevent direct visual observation of the soffit at that section of the deck.

WATERWAY
The bed of the channel is protected with grouted rock. The channel walls are sloped and have concrete paving. At the downstream (southerly) end of the channel about 10 feet from the structure, the channel bed elevation decreases by about 8 feet along a slope. There are check damns located further downstream.

There is a water gauge and a water level scale at the northwesterly corner of the bridge.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

Printed on : Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 3 of 7 55C0281 /AAAL/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(S) 1.00 ft br, 8.80 ft SW, 105.00 ft, 2.50 ft cu, 0.34 ft br (N)

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 22.9 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 36.0 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK

40.0 M
LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 2.7 M
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 40.0 M
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
1-CIP CONCRETE
6-BITUMINOUS
0-NONE
0-NONE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 3 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 57000
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2013 (109) TRUCK ADT % 5 %
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE 000000000000
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
0-NOT STRAHNET
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY

99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 23.4 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 TOLERABLE
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
(114) FUTURE ADT
5 KM (28a) LANES 10
40 N/A
105024 SPEED
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2044 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE (37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RA TINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prat Defect
16 510
Top Flange-RC
Deck Wearing Surface-Asphalt
3220 Cracking-AC (WS)
(16) Top Flange-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
(16-510-3220) Cracking-AC (WS)
(58) DECK RATING= 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
2 2
2 916 sq.m
824 sq.m
247
916
824
247
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 There are longitudinal cracks in all lanes. The cracks typically occur along the wheel lines in the lanes and along the longitudinal joints where the bridge was widened. The crack widths are less than 0.50 inches.

About 30% of the AC overlay is estimated to be cracked (2,660 square feet CS 2).

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code (36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units
No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1
330 Railing-Metal 2 23 m 23
(330) Railing-Metal
There were no significant defects noted.
331 Railing-RC 2 23 m 23
(331) Railing-RC
There were no significant defects noted.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 4 of 7
Roadway Speed 40 MPH
Qty in each Condition State
CS 2 CS 3 CS4
0 0 0
0 0 0
55C0281 /AAAL/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RA TINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prat Defect
104 Box Girder-PS Cone.
1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(104-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Env Total
Qty
2 46
2 3
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7
Units Qty in each Condition State
cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
m 43 3 0 0
0 3 0 0
There are patches of white efflorescence along the soffit at random locations affecting less than 5% of the structure (25 square feet cs 2).
110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 92 m 92 0 0 0
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
312 Bearing-Enclosed 2 2 each 2 0 0 0
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
The enclosed bearing element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on the original structure under the box girder units.

The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of distress or alignment problems were noted in any superstructure element associated with bearings.

SUBSTRUCTURE
DESCmPTIONUNDERSTRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC trapezoidal.
5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE
N/A
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE N/A

0.0 M
M

0.0 M
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty C.S 1 CS 7 CS. 3 CS.A
215 Abutment-RC 2 92 m 86 6 0 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 6 0 6 0 0
(215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment 1 (westerly) has two cracks up to 0.05 inches wide (2 feet CS 2).

Abutment 2 (easterly) has vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and spaced at 8 feet on average (18 feet CS 2). 227 Pile-RC 2 ea. 0 0 0
(227) Pile-RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 5 of 7 55C0281 /AAAU87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Main tenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1 Photo 2
Abutment 2 vertical crack on the diaphragm abutment under the Abutment 2 verti.cal crack on the seat abutment under the box box girder section. girder units.

Photo 3
Utilities attached to the northerly exterior of the bridge.

Photo 5
Utilities between the original bridge and widening underneath the structure.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 0944 AM Page
Photo 4
Utilities attached to the southerly exterior of the bridge. 6 of 7 55C0281 /AAAL/87976
Department of Transpor1ation - Division of Maintenance

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Printed on: Thursday 12/0 1/2022 09:44 AM
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
-NONE
-NONE
-NONE
-NONE
-NONE

Page 7 of 7 ends

55C0261 0S0 CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY) 0.2 Ml W OF 1-5
133 - Unclassified
Photo #1
Abutment 2 vertical crack on 1he diaphragm abutment under the box girder seclion Apr 01, 2022 [AAAL]
55C0281 OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY) 0.2 Ml W OF 1-5
133 - Unclassified
Photo #2
Abutment 2 vertical crack on the seat abutment under the box girder units.

Apr 01, 2022 [AAAL]
SSC0281 OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY) 0.2 Ml W OF 1-5
133 - Unclassified
Utilities attached to the northerly exterior of the bridge.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAL]
55C0281 OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY) 0.2 Ml W OF 1-5
133 - Unclassified
Photo #4
Utilities attached to the southerly exterior of the bridge Jun 17, 2022 [AAAL]
55C0281 OSO CREEK (CROWN VALLEY PKWY! 0.2 Ml W OF 1-5
133 - Unclassified
Photo 1;5
Utilities between tl1e original b,i dge and widening underneath the structure.

Jun 17. 2022 [AAAL]
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance
l!it
liz/trans
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0496

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
STRUCTURE NAME:

SULPHUR CREEK

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE

0.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR (7) FACILITY CARRIED
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
33°33'05.15" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
117°43'01.96" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58} DECK N N/A (NBI) DECK AREA (M)2
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
ON
INSPECTION DATE:

February 19, 2022

ALICIA PARKWAY

SULPHUR CREEK
150000000

NOT ON NHS
515
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60} SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
N N/A (NBI) SUFFICIENCY RATING 87.1

N N/A (NBI) PAINT CONDITION N/A
6 DETERIORATION STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD (67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (03/28/2022) Routine-Elevation View (03/30/2018) Routine-Underside View (03/30/2018) Routine-Map View (03/28/2022) TEAM LEADER Ashraf Shenouda
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.Wongsavanh/A.Shenouda
5/26/2022
Ashra Date
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page 1 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CALIFORNIA 069 (90) INSPECTION DATE 02/22 (91) FREQUENCY 48 MO (2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
(3) COUNTY CODE
12 (55)0RANGE
(39248) LAGUNA NIGUEL
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A
(4) PLACE CODE B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C) N/A
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1976 (45) MAIN SPANS
(106) YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46) APPR SPANS
(34) SKEW 20 (48) MAX SPAN (M)
(49) LENGTH (M) 12.8 (35) STR FLARE
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
N/A
N/A
3 0

3.7 0-NO
0 (43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 19: CULVERT
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
NO. OF HINGES 0
Triple (12 ft x 12 ft x 132 ft) long RC box culvert (non-grade top) on spread footing under+/- 2 ft of fill and AC overlay.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
3@ 12 ft

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64) OPERATING RATING
(41) STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS

POSTING LOADS
0 UNKNOWN (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1.67 =>54.1 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
3 inches

PERMIT RATING
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Speed
Safe
Loads
Legal
Le.gal
Legal
50 Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons l A~~:~al Ordinance/Order Requirements
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
MPH
Posting Date N/ A
Load Rating Summary Date O 1 /31 /18 I
A~~~~al Signs
Load Rating Type Assigned Culvert !----=-~ ~ ~ ------- - - - ----- - -' Load Rating Tool - Date SMI Inspection Procedure Manual Section 5.1 O - 01/31/18

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance to SM&I policy and procedure by walking on, around and under the structure.

Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page 2 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
There was fast flowing water upstream that slowed down through the culvert. Barrels 1 and 3 had little water. Barrel 2 had flowing water up to 1 inch deep.

NUMBERING CONVENTION
This structure alignment is skewed, with the roadway running north and south and the culvert passing southwest to northeast, making the location of Barrel 1 unclear. Furthermore, no as-built plans for this structure are currently stored in BIRIS (as of 02/19/2022). The upstream end of the culvert is located to the southwest. Barrel 1 refers to the southeasterly box and Box 3 is the northwesterly barrel.

MISCELLANEOUS
There is a check dam approximately 3 feet downstream of the culvert. The top of the check dam is approximately 8 feet above the water surface below and has dense vegetation.

DECK AND ROADWAY
There appears to be new AC overlay on the roadway. See Photo 8.

CULVERT
The upstream noses are not a part of the culvert element. There is minor abrasion and spalling of the noses.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(W) 5.00 ft ea, 9.50 ft sw, 41 .70 ft, 6.20 ft & varies cu med, 60.0 ft, 8.90 ft sw, 5.00 ft ea (E)

DECK GEOMETRY
(49) LENGTH
(51) NETWIDTH
(52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN

12.8 M
31 .0 M

40.2 M
LEFT 0.0 M RIGHT 0.0 M

34.3 M
2 CLOSED MED W/O BARRIER

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE N-NOT APPLICABLE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE N-NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

N-NOT APPLICABLE

N-NOT APPLICABLE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 3 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 35200
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2013 (109) TRUCK ADT % 4 %
{19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 6 KM
(114) FUTURE ADT 60051
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2044
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 18.3 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL
(28a) LANES
SPEED
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
3-ON FREE ROAD
6 50
N/A
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE {58) DECK RATING= N

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page 3 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(36a) Rail Code O (36b) Transition O (36c) Appr Guardrail O (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 50 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES -NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE N/A
Unimproved natural earth with moderate vegetation growth.

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (62)CULVERT RATING= Elem Defect} Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State N/A

0.0 M
M

0.0 M
6 No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 ~s 2 cs~ CSA________
241 Culvert-RC 2 121 m 87 31 3 0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 4 0 2 2 0
1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 19 0 18 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 13 2 11 0 0
(241-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Barrel 3 has a headwall spall approximately 18 inches x 4 inches x 2 inches at the upstream end (1 square foot, CS 3). Refer to Photo 5.

Barrel 3 has a 18 inches long x 4 inches wide spall with exposed rebar and effloressence staining at the construction joint (1 square foot, CS 3). Refer to Photo 1.

Barrel 2 has a 10 inches x 6 inches delamination at the bottom of Wall 3 toward the downstream end (1 square foot, CS 2). Refer to Photo 4.

Barrel 1 has a 12 inches x 8 inches delamination at the bottom of the downstream nose of Wall 2 (1 square foot, CS 2). Refer to Photo 6.
(241-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Barrels 1 and 3 have longitudinal (perpendicular to barrels) ceiling cracks with white efflorescence staining spaced at 4 feet on average along the upstream half of the culvert.
(132 feet [Barrel Length]/ 2 [f:jalf-length] / 4 feet [Spacing] x 2 [Number of Barrels] = 33 feet affected, CS 2) Barrel 2 has longitudinal ceiling cracks with white efflorescence staining spaced approximately 8 feet on average. (132 feet [Barrel Length]/ 8 feet [Spacing]= 16.5 feet affected, CS 2) There are white efflorescence stains at the construction joints in all barrels (6 feet, CS 2).

Barrel 3 has brown efflorescence stains on the ceiling at the downstream construction joint (1 foot, CS 3). Refer to Photo 2.

Approximately 30 feet downstream of that construction joint, there is a 3 feet x 3 feet white patch of cracks and efflorescence on the ceiling (3 feet, CS 2). See Photo 7.
(241-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Wall 3 in Barrel 2 has an 8 foot vertical crack approximately 0.05 inches wide at the downstream end.

All interior walls have minor vertical and diagonal cracks less than 0.05 inches spaced at 10 feet on average. (132 feet [Barrel Length] / 10 feet [Spacing] x 3 [Barrels] = 39.6 feet of cracking, CS 2) Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page 4 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

SUBSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1
Spall with rebar at the construction joint of Barrel 3. The rebar is rusted.

Photo 3
Check dam downstream of the culvert
Photo 5
Barrel 3 upstream headwall spall
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Photo 2
Efflorescence staining at the construction joint of Barrel 3 Photo 4
Delaminated concrete on Wall 3 in Barrel 2
Photo 6
Wall 2 downstream nose spall
5 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

SUBSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 7
Efflorescence patch in Barrel 3 looking upstream

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 8
Roadway above the culvert with new AC overlay.

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 02/19/2022 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Patch spalls
Remove and repair all unsound concrete and spalls.

Est Cost
Str Target 2 YEARS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Dist Target
EA
Barrel 3 has a headwall spall approximately 18 inches x 4 inches x 2 inches at the upstream end. Refer to Photo 5.

Barrel 3 has a 18 inches x 4 inches x 2 inches spall with exposed rebar and effloressence staining at the construction joint. Refer to Photo 1.

Barrel 2 has a 10 inches x 6 inches x 0.5 inches de lamination at the floor of Wall 3 toward the downstream end . Refer to Photo 4.

Barrel 1 has a 12 inches x 8 inches x 0.5 inches delamination at the floor of the downstream nose of Wall 2. Refer to Photo 6.

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS -NONE
Printed on: Thursday 05/26/2022 01 :57 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0496/AAAl/77816 55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK D.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 - Sub-Damage/Deterioration
~r.7-----:------c;---;-:::-;:::-~-:---~-:,:r:~lllil!ll
Photo #1
Spall with rebar at the construction joint of Barrel 3. The rebar is rusted.

Mar 28, 2022 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK 0.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 - Sub-Damage/Deterioration
Photo #2
Efflorescence staining at the construction joint of Barrel 3 Mar 28, 2022 [AAAI]
55CD496 SULPHUR CREEK 0,32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
131 - Hydraulic-Misc
Check dam downstream of the culvert
Mar 28 2022 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK 0.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 - Sub-Damage'Deterioratio11
Photo #4
Delam,nated concrete 011 Wall 3 i11 Ba rrel 2
Mar 28. 2022 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK 0,32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 - Sub-Damage/Deterioration
Barrel 3 upstream headwall spall
Mar 28, 2018 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK 0.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 - Sub-Damage/Deterioration
Photo #6
Wall 2 downstream nose spall
Mar 28, 2018 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK 0.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
113 • Sub-Damage/Deterioration
Efflorescence patch in Barrel 3 looking upstream
Mar 28, 2022 [AAAI]
55C0496 SULPHUR CREEK D.32 Ml S ALISO CREEK DR
1 DD - Routine-Roadway View
Photo #8
Roadway above the culvert with new AC overlay.

Mar 28 2022 [AAAIJ
' 1 · DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
lilltlrlns· Structure Maintenance and Investigations

TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT
Tunnel Description:

Tunnel Number : 55C0497
Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
Inspection Date : 6/17/2024 I INSPECTION TYPE
Routine Damage In Depth Special
0 D D D
A 177-foot long single bore non-complex tunnel with corrugate galvanized steel liner on spread footings, concrete slab-on-grade and a functional system of lighting.

Location, Age and Type:

Facility Carried (I.IO) : Salt Creek Service Road
Mile Post (1.12)
Year Built (A.1) : 1979
Year Rehabilitated (A.2) : 0
Owner (C.l) : 04 City/Municipal Hwy
Tunnel Shape (S.2)
LRS Location (1.11)
Inspection Staff:

Team Leader
: Oval
Structure/Civil/Signs/ Protection Systems
Mechanical Systems
Electrical/Lighting Systems
: Martin Furlong
: Monil Singh
: NIA
: Monil Singh
Fire/Life Safety/Security Systems : NIA
Registered Professional Engineer :

Geometry:

Tunnel Length (G.l)
Min. Vertical Clearance (G.2)
Max.Vertical Clearance (CA.G.6)
Roadway Width (G.3)
Left Sidewalk Width (G.4)
Right Sidewalk Width (G.5)
Number of Lanes (A.3)
: 177 Ft.
: 9.4 Ft.
: ll.7Ft.
: 14.0 Ft.
: 3.0 Ft.
: 3.0 Ft.
: 1
10/09/2024
---------------------------- Date
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM CT\s135694 Page 1 of 6 B7FFDB450B8545D3BB164EB9A404EEC2 ' I, · DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
lbltlr:fns• Structure Maintenance and Investigations
Inspection Commentary:

General:
.::funnel Number : 55C0497
Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
Inspection Date : 6/l 7 /2024
The inspection was conducted in accordance with the 2015 National Tunnel Inspection Standards and the 2015 Tunnel Operations, Maintenance, Inspection and Evaluation Manual.

The National Tunnel Inventory (NTI) items and the condition states of the tunnel elements were determined in accordance with the 2015 Specifications for the National Tunnel Inventory.

Scope and Access
This tunnel inspection was conducted by Martin Furlong, Monil Singh, Vidzro Hine and Ke Ding from Structures Maintenance and Investigations, Office of Specialty Investigations.

A complete inspection was performed in accordance to the Tunnel Specific Inspection Procedures dated 05/24/2024 on the structural, civil, and functional systems. The inspection began and was completed on 06/17/2024. The tunnel was inspected by walking the length of the tunnel and both portals.

No special equipment or traffic control was utilized during the inspection.

Revision:

Inventory Item A.8 (Service in Tunnel) was changed to "Highway and Pedestrian".

Civil:

The following civil components are not reported to FHW A but are included in the tunnel inspection.

Sidewalk:

There are 3 feet wide sidewalks that run longitudinally on the south and north sides of the tunnel.

1. In the sidewalk there were transverse cracks up to 0.031 inches wide spaced approximately 10 feet on the center.

2. Approximately 68 feet from the west portal on the north side there was a transverse crack up to 0.5 inches wide by 3 feet long by 1 inch deep.
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM CT\s135694 Page 2 of 6 B7FFDB450B8545D388164E89A404EEC2 ' :f- , DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
tbllrr:fn6• Structure Maintenance and Investigations
Tunnel Number : 55C0497
Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
I nsoection Date : 6/17/2024
Inspection Results and Element Condition States
Element SU Quantity Units CSl CS2 CS3 CS4
10000-Steel Tunnel Liner 1 7080 sqft 6,489 415 176 0
80000-Leakage , I 142 sqft 0 142 0 0
81 100-Corrosion , l 449 sqft 0 273 176 0
10950-Steel Corrosion Protective Coat • l 7080 sqft 6,631 0 273 176 803 81-Effectiveness (Fire/Steel)* , 1 449 sqft 0 0 273 176 Steel Tunnel Liner The steel liner is constructed from galvanized corrugated structural steel plates.

Leakage There were random areas of water staining on the liner from leakage at the steel plate connections totaling approximately 2 percent of the tunnel liner ( 142 in CS2). During this inspection there was no moisture present.

The following is a list of significant corrosion in the steel tunnel liner.

1. At random locations throughout the liner there was corrosion ranging from freckled rust to section loss (50 in CS2, 45 <r. Corrosion in CS3). See Photos 3 and 4.
(?l 2. On the north and south sides of the tunnel from the interface of the sidewalk and the steel liner to a height of z " approximately I-foot there was corrosion ranging from freckled rust to section loss. The section loss was up to 8 inches diameter with the greatest concentration between 73 feet and 156 feet from the western portal (223 in CS2, 131 in CS3).

See Photos 5 and 6.

Steel Corrosion The steel liner has a galvanized protective coat.

Protective Coat
Effectiveness The galvanization has limited effectiveness in the areas with freckled rust (273 in CS3). The galvanization has failed and (Fire/Steel)* no longer provides protection of the underlying metal in the areas with section loss (176 in CS4).

Element SU Quantity Units cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
10051-Concrete Portal 1 100 sqft 40 8 52 0
82100-Delamination /Spall/ Patch I J 1 IO sqft 0 8 2 0
82103-Cracking (Concrete Liner) 'J 1 50 sqft 0 0 50 0
The concrete portals at each end of the tunnel consists of a 2-foot wide strip of concrete. The vertical section of the Concrete Portal western portal was coated with paint. The southern half of the vertical section of the eastern portal was coated with paint.

The following is a list of significant defects at the portals.

Delamination / 1. At the crown of the western portal there were 5 locations of sound patched concrete each approximately 4 inches Spall / Patch wide by 16 inches high (8 in CS2).

2. At the crown of the eastern portal there was a spall 2 feet wide by 3 inches high by 2 inches deep (2 in CS3).

The following is a list of significant crack defects at the western portal. rJ
0 I. There were vertical cracks up to 0.015 inches wide spaced approximately 2 feet on center (12 in CS3). z

2. On the north and south sides at the transition from the diagonal to the vertical portal there were transverse cracks up tc

0.125 inches wide (4 in CS3).

Cracking (Concrete The following is a list of significant crack defects at the eastern portal. Liner)

1. At the crown there was an area approximately 12 square feet with horizontal and vertical cracks up to 0.75 inches wide spaced approximately I-foot on center (12 in CS3). See Photos 11 and 12.

2. There were vertical cracks up to 0.015 inches wide spaced approximately I-foot on center (20 in CS3).

3. On the south side at the transition from the diagonal to the vertical portal there was a transverse crack up to 0.125 inches wide (2 in CS3).

Element SU Quantity Units cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
10111-Concrete Slab-on-Grade 1 2478 sqft 2,328 22 128 0 80002-Settlement • 1 70 sqft 0 0 70 0
80225-Cracking(Concrete)* , 1 70 sqft 0 14 56 0
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM CT\s135694 Page 3 of 6 B7FFDB450BB545D3BB164E89A404EEC2 ' rl;, , DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
lblttrfns• Structure Maintenance and Investigations
Tunnel Number : 55C0497
Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
inspection Date : 6/l 7 /2024
82100-Delamination / Spall / Patch • I IO sqft 0 8 2 0
Settlement Beginning from approximately 94 feet from the western portal there was a 10 feet wide by 7 feet long section of slab-ongrade that has settled up to 7/8 inches (70 in CS3). See Photos 9 and IO.

The following is a list of significant cracks in the concrete slab-on-grade. Locations noted are approximated from the western portal. For typical transverse crack in the slab-on-grade see Photos 7 and 8.

Cracking 1. At 15 feet there was a 14 feet long transverse crack up to 0.03 inches wide (14 in CS2).

Ill (Concrete)* 2. At 45 feet there was a 14 feet long transverse crack up to I-inch wide (14 in CS3).

Q) 3. At 91 feet there was a 14 feet long transverse crack up to 0.50 inches wide (14 in CS3). 0 4. At 110 feet there was a 14 feet long transverse crack up to 1-inch wide (14 in CS3). z

5. At 160 feet there was a 14 feet long transverse crack up to I-inch wide (14 in CS3).

The following is a list of significant spall defects in the slab-on-grade.

Delamination / I. Approximately 27 feet from the western portal on the north side there was a spall 18 inches round by 0.50 inches Spall / Patch deep (2 in CS3).

2. From 73 feet to 104 feet from the western portal there were spalls up to 6 inches round by 0.125 inches deep totaling approximately 8 square feet (8 in CS2).

Element SU Quantity Units CSI CS2 CS3 CS4
I 0600-Tunnel Lighting System 1 1 each 1 0 0 0
Ill Tunnel Lighting The tunnel lighting system consists of3 light emitting diode (LED) lights along the center line of the tunnel. See Photo ~ 0 System 2. No significant defects were noted. z Element SU Quantity Units cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
10601-Tunnel Lighting Fixture 1 3 each 3 0 0 0
ill
~.) Tunnel Lighting There are 3 tunnel lighting fixtures. No significant defects were noted. ~ Fixture
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM CT\s135694 Page 4 of 6 B7FFDB450B8545D388164E89A404EEC2 Tunnel Number : 55C0497 ' .. , DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
lbltn:rns· Structure Maintenance and Investigations Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel -----------------------"-•n=SJ!ection Date : 6/17/2024
Wta,lReca~
----------~
Status DistEAS Work By Date Priority Action
a-Proposed 4-Local Agency 8/14/2017 Routine T1 - Structural/Civil-Rehab 1 Element 10111 (Concrete Slab-on-Grade)
Estimate
, Beginning from approximately 94 feet from the western portal there was a 10 feet wide by 7 feet long section of slab-on- ,grade that has settled up to 7/8 inches.
: Repair the concrete slab on grade that has settled and separated vertically up to 7 /8 inch at a transverse crack. 1This work recommendation was reviewed and updated on 06/17/2024 and is still valid. a-Proposed 4-Local Agency 8/14/2017 Routine T2 - Structural/Civil-Maint. ;Element 10000 (Steel Tunnel Liner)
, 1. At random locations throughout the liner there was corrosion ranging from freckled rust to section loss. , 2. On the north and south sides of the tunnel from the interface of the sidewalk and the steel liner to a height of •approximately 1-foot there was corrosion ranging from freckled rust to section loss. The section loss was up to 8 inches diameter with the greatest concentration between 73 feet and 156 feet from the western portal. • Blast clean the areas of corrosion in the steel liner, spot prep and paint. Repair or replace the steel liner at the areas that I have section loss.
:This work recommendation was reviewed and updated on 06/17/2024 and is still valid. 0-Proposed 4-Local Agency 7/28/2020 Priority T2 - Structural/Civil-Ma int.

Element 10051 (Concrete Portal)
At the crown of the eastern portal there was an area approximately 12 square feet with horizontal and vertical cracks up to 0.75 inches wide spaced approximately 1-foot on center with delaminate concrete.

Remove the delaminated concrete at the crown of the eastern portal and re patch.

I This work recommendation was reviewed and updated on 06/17/2024 and is still valid.

Total
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM Cl\s135694 Page 5 of 6 B7FFDB450B8545D388164E89A404EEC2 ' 1 · DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
lblttrv,s· Structure Maintenance and Investigations
Tunnel Number : 55C0497
Tunnel Name : Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
Inspection Date : 6/l 7 /2024
Age and Service Items Identification Items
(A. l) Year Built 1979
(A.2) Year Rehab. 0
(A.3) Total Number Lanes
(A.4)AADT 5
(A.5)ADTT 0
(A.6) AADT Year 2021
(A. 7) Detour Length
(A.8) Service in Tunnel Highway/Pedestrian
Classification Items
(C.l)Owner 04 City/Municipal Hwy
(C.2) Operator 04 City/Municipal Hwy
(C.3) Direction of Traffic One lane 2-way traffic
(C.4)Toll No tolls
(C.5) NHS Designation Route is not on the NHS
(C.6) STRAHNET Not a STRAHNET route
(C.7) Functional Class, Local
(C.8) Urban Code Mission Viejo
Inspection Items
(D.1) Inspection Target Date
(D.2) Routine lnsp. Date
(D.3) Routine Inspection Inter.
(D.4) In-Depth Insp. Sched.
(D.5) Damage Insp. Perform.
(D.6) Special Insp. Sched.
7/17/2018
6/17/2024
24 0-Not Scheduled
0 0-Not Scheduled
Geometric Data Items
(G,l) Tunnel Length
(G.2) Min. Vert. Clearance
(G.3) Roadway Width C-C
(G.4) Left Sidewalk Width
(G.5) Right Sidewalk Width
177Ft.

9.4 Ft.

14.0Ft.

3.0 Ft.

3.0Ft.

California Data
(CA.D.7) Insp. Comp. Date
(CA.D.8) Inv. Updated Date
(CA.G.6) Max. Vert. Clearance
Max Tunnel Liner(Calc.)
(CA.H. l) Health: Structural
(CA.H.2) Health: Mechanical
(CA.H.3) Health: Electrical
(CA.H.4) Health: Fire/Safety
MPO:
6/17/2024
7/9/2024

11.7 Ft.
7080 Sq. Ft.

Fair
NIA
Good
NIA
Southern California (SCA
10/9/2024 10:06:44 AM CT\s135694
(I.I) Tunnel Number 55C0497
(1.2) Tunnel Name Salt Creek Service Road Tunnel
(1.3) State 06 California
(1.4) County ORA
(I 5) Place Code LAGUNA NIGUEL
(1.6) District 12
(1.7) Route Number 0
(1.8) Route Direction Two route directions
(1.9) Route Type
(1.10) Facility Carried
(1.11) LRS Route ID
(1.12) LRS Mile Point
(I. 13) Latitude
(1.14) Longitude
(1.15) Border Tunnel State
(1.16) Financial Repons.
(1.17) Border Tunnel No.
(1.18) Inspection Respons.

Other
Salt Creek Service Road

33.50612500
117.70815800
Not Applicable (P)
Not Applicable (P)
Load Rating and Posting Items
(L. l) Load Rating Method Field Evaluation
(L.2) Invent. Rating Factor 1.00
(L.3) Oper. Rating Factor 1.67
(L.4) Load Posting Status A - No Restriction
(L.5) Posting Load-Gross
(L.6) Posting Load-Axle
(L.7) Posting Load-Type3
(L.8) Posting Load-Type 3S2
(L.9) Posting Load-Type 33
(L.l 0) Height Restriction Yes
(L.11) Hazrnat Restriction 0-No
(L. 12) Other Restrictions 0-No
Navigation Items
(N.l)UnderNav. Waterway No navigable waterway
(N.2) Waterway Clearance
(N.3) Protection from Nav. 0 - Nav pro! not reg.

Structure Type and Material Items
(S. l) Number Bores
(S.2) Tunnel Shape
(S.3) Portal Shape
(S.4) Ground Cond.
(S.5) Complex

Page 6 of 6 ends

Oval
Oval
Soil
Not Complex
B7FFDB450B8545D388164E89A404EEC2

0.0 Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
Photo I: Western portal looking east.

Photo 2: Typical operational light in the tunnel.

Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
Photo 3: Corrosion and section loss in the steel tunnel liner. .I
Photo 4: Close-up view of the corrosion and section loss in the steel tunnel liner.

Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
Photo 5: Corrosion with section loss at the interface of the sidewalk and the steel tunnel liner between 73 feet and I 56 feet from the western portal.

Photo 6: Close-up view of the corrosion with section loss at the interface of the sidewalk and the steel tunnel liner between 73 feet and 156 feet from the western portal.

Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
Photo 7: Typical transverse crack in the slab-on-grade.

Photo 8: Close-up view of typical transverse crack in the slab-on-grade.

Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
Photo 9: Settlement in the slab-on-grade approximately 94 feet from the western portal.

Photo 10: Close-up view of the settlement in the slab-on-grade approximately 94 feet from the western portal.

Tunnel 55C0497 (Salt Creek Service Road)
06/17/2024
_ _,..._ j
Photo 11: Cracking at the crown of the eastern portal.

Photo 12: Close-up view of the cracking at the crown of the eastern portal.

Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations • lbJtrang

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0500
STRUCTURE NAME:

SALT CREEK BIKE PATH

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION

0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
0 33°29'37 .13"
(7) FACILITY CARRIED
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
(5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
INSPECTION DATE:

June 17, 2022

CAMINO DEL AVION

SALT CREEK BIKE PA TH
ON 150000000
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE 117°42'55.6" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
7 GOOD DECK AREA (M)2 845
(5 FAIR) SUFFICIENCY RATING 65.8
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (06/17/2022) Routine-Elevation View (06/17/2022) - ..
. - - ~-J. ~- -- : ._ ->· --: ~i::;- - ,
Routine-Underside View (06/17/2022) Routine-Map View (06/17/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.WongsavanhNL.Dang
12/1/2022
Date
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:45 AM Page 1 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977 Department of Transportation• Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CALIFORNIA 069 (90) INSPECTION DATE 06/22 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO (2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
(3) COUNTY CODE
12 (55)ORANGE
(39248) LAGUNA NIGUEL
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A %SHARE
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1980 (45) MAIN SPANS
(106) YEAR MODIFIED N/A (46) APPR SPANS
(34)SKEW 0 (48) MAX SPAN (M)
(49) LENGTH (M) 39.6 (35) STR FLARE
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
N/A
N/A
0 39
0-NO
2 A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A

B) UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) N/A

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MOC) N/A
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 5: PRESTRESS CONC
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN 06: BOX BEAM OR GDR - SN
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
NO. OF HINGES 0
Single span CIP/PS concrete box girder (8 cells) supported by open end RC diaphragm abutments with monolithic wingwalls on spread footing.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(S) 178.50 ft (N)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64)OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS
Existing
5 MS 18 (HS 20) (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=2.88 =>93.3 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
Oinches
Posting
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads
Type 3 Legal
Type 3S2 Legal
Type 3-3 Legal
Speed 45
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Signs
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons

N/A MPH
r ~~~al Q.,J;a,ooo/O<dec R..,..rnmeot,
Posting Date NIA
Load Rating Summary Date 06/20/2017
Load Rating Type Calculated
Load Rating Tool - Date BOS - 10/13/82

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:45 AM Page 2 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance with SM&I policy and procedures. The bridge deck was inspected by walking along the sidewalk and median. The superstructure and substructure were inspected by walking under the structure and with the aid of binoculars.

NUMBERING CONVENTION
The support numbering system used on the as-bui lt plans for this structure is reversed from the standard numbering convention used by Structure Maintenance and Investigations. For this structure, the southerly support is Abutment 1 and the northerly support is Abutment

2. This report and all subsequent reports will follow the SM&I numbering convention.

HISTORY
In the BIR dated 7/31/1996, a "longitudinal joint seal between approach slab and concrete curb has failed." In the BIR dated 11/30/1998, "the longitudinal joint seal has been repaired" on 7/31/1996.

The specific joint seal is not identified but is assumed to be the pourable joint seal located at the northerly end of the bridge due to the change in quantity of joint seal between the 1996 and 1998 report.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(W) 1.00 ft br, 5.00 ft sw, 27.00 ft, 4.00 ft med, 27.00 ft, 5.00 ft sw, 1.00 ft br (E).

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 39.6 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 16.5 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK
21 .3 M
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M

16.5 M
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS (100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
1-CIP CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 11900
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT % 3 %
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 5 KM
(114) FUTURE ADT
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
24068
2044
5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem DefecV Element Description
No. Prot Defect
16 Top Flange-RC
Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:45 AM Page
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 8.2 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 4 TOLERABLE
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
(28a) LANES 4
SPEED
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
(58) DECK RATING= 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
2 832 sq.m 669 163 0 0
45 NIA
3 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 163 0 163 0 0
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are transverse and diagonal cracks throughout the top surface of the deck which are less than 0.05 inches in width and spaced at 4 feet on average.
(7034 square feet [Deck Net Area] x 0.25 (CAF, 4 feet spacing] = 1759 square feet CS 2)

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code (36b) Transition O (36c) Appr Guardrail 0 (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 45 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
301 Joint-Pourable Seal
2330 Seal Damage (Joints)
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
The northerly joint has a pourable seal.
(301-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
2 2
22 11
m 11
0 11
11 0
0 At least 50% of the northerly joint seal is worn and has seal abrasion but there are no signs of puncture or adhesion failure requiring repairs or replacement. (36 feet CS 2)
There is loose sand and debris in the joints that does not impact movement.

The pourable joint seal width was measured to be 1.5 inches wide at 74 degrees Fahrenheit on 2/19/2022. 302 Joint-Compression Seal 2 22 m 22 0 0
(302) Joint-Compression Seal
The southerly joint has a compression seal. The compression seal has some loose sand that does not impact movement.

The seal is in good condition.
321
1080
1130
Approach Slab-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
(321-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
2 250
5 60
sq.m 185
0 0
55 5
50 10
0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
The northerly approach slab in northbound Lane 1 has a patch approximately 6 feet by 8 feet in size located adjacent to the joint. The patch is sound. Refer to Photo 8. (48 square feet CS 2) (321-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The north and south approach slabs have a total of 4 diagonal and longitudinal cracks greater than 0.05 inches wide and spanning the entire slab length. There is treatment material along some portions of these cracks but the treatment appears ineffective and these cracks remain unsealed. (100 square feet CS 3) The slabs also have unsealed cracks that are 0.03 inches wide on average, present on 20% of the net slab area. (540 square feet CS 2)
Refer to Photos 1, 2, and 3.
333
1080
1130
Railing-Other
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 79
4 8
m 67
0 0
12 4
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:45 AM Page 4 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES Elem DefecV Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
(333-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
There are multiple unsound areas along both concrete rails. The unsound areas are typically 2 inches to 4 inches in diameter. About 5% of the rail quantity is affected. (13 feet CS 2) (333-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The concrete portion of the rail exhibits several vertical cracks less than 0.05 inches wide. About 10% of the rail quantity is affected. (26 feet CS 2)

SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= (5) Elem DefecU Element Description Env
No. Prot Defect
104 Box Girder-PS Cone. 2
1110 Cracking (PS Cone.) 2
(104-1110) Cracking (PS Cone.)
Total
Qty
39 8
Units Qty in each Condition State
cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
m 31
0 0
0 8
8 0
0 There are five longitudinal soffit cracks 0.01 to 0.03 inches wide propagating from Abutment 2. These cracks are approximately 25 feet long and spaced at 8 feet apart on average. (25 feet CS 3)

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER 5-WATERWAY (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL (69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE
N/A
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth with AC trail
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
8 PROTECTED (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE N/A

0.0 M
M

0.0 M
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem DefecU Element Description
No. Prot Defect
215 Abutment-RC
1130 Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. (215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty CS 1 C.S 2 CS 3...__CS 4
2 2
71 3
m 68
0 3
3 0
0 0
0 There are three full-height vertical cracks at Abutment 1 that are 0.03 inches wide on average. (3 feet CS 2) Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:45 AM Page 5 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1
Approach slab cracks at the northbound approach.

Photo 3
Approach slab cracks at the southbound approach.

Photo 5
General view of the southbound deck looking toward the
easterly end.

Printed on Thursday 12/01/2022 0S::45 AM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Photo 2
Approach slab cracks at the southbound departure.

Photo 4
Southerly joint over Abutment 1 in the southbound lanes_ Photo 6
~-:- . 7f:t1j;o/f
2 -
Northerly joint over Abutment 2 in the southbound lanes. 6 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
View of the northerly departure slab in the northbound lane, looking southerly.

Photo 9
General view of the northbound deck, looking southerly.

Photo 11
Right rail post patch under the second post south of the southerly joint.

F'rinled on: T::u1·s02y 12/01 /2022 OS:45 l',M Page
Structure Maintenance 8, lnvesligatims
Photo 8
Concrete patch in the northerly departure slab in the
_ ___ ~orthbound lane near the j~in~ ..,..,.._
I
I
Photo 10
View of the right rail standing at the southerly end looking northerly.
7 of 8
Photo 12
Longitudinal cracks in the soffit.
55C0500/P,Afa, /~i87977
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 13
Easterly overhang looking northerly standing at the right side of Abutment 1 (southerly).

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 03/26/2020 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Deck-Methacrylate
Treat the entire deck with methacrylate.

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 01/13/2017 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Appr. Slab-Repair
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Photo 14
View of the bridge underclearance on the bike path.

Est Cost Dist Target
Sir Target ROUTINE EA
Est Cost Dist Target
Str Target ROUTINE EA
Seal the longitudinal full length cracks in the approach slabs and treat the approach slabs with methacrylate.

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS -NONE

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Printed on : Thursday 12/01/2022 09:45 AM Page 8 of 8 55C0500/AAAN/87977 55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0 4 Ml E CROWN VLY PKWY
133 - Unclassifi ed
Approa ch slab cracks at the nortllbound approach.

Ma,· 28 , 2022 [AAA N]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH O 4 Ml E CRO\/VN VLY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Approach slab cracks at tl1e southbound depar1ure.

Mar 28, 2022 [AAAN]

5.5C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PA TH O 4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY 133 - Unclassified
Photo #3
Approach slab cracks al lhe southbound approach
Mar 28, 2022 [AAAN]
55 C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKV\IY 133 - Unclassified
Southerly joint over Abutment 1 111 the southbound lanes Jun 17. 2022 [AAAN]
Jun 17 2022 [AAAN)
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #5
General view of the southbound deck looking toward the easterly end. 55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
.._,"'\,:: _-._;,,,,,,. ,· _. - • -, ' . r . .,. .. ' • - -- - -- •, . .
- - -
Northerly jofnt over Abutment 2 in the southbound lanes.

Jun 17. 2022 [AAAN)
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 04 Ml E CROWN VLY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
- -~
Pl1oto # 7
View of the northe, ly departllle slab i11 tl1e 11ortl1bou11d lane lool<i 11g southe 1·Iy Jun 17 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VLY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Concrete patch in the northerly departure slab in the northbound lane near the joint Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKVVY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #9
General view of the 11011hbound deck. looking southerly.

Jun 11 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PA TH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #10
View of the right rail standing at the soutl1erly end looking northerly Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PA TH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photot:11
Right rail post palcl1 under the second post south of the soulherly joint.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN)
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VLY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Longitudinal cracks in the soffit.

Mar 28, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0.4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Easterly overhang looking northerly standing at the right side of Abutment 1 (southerly), Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
Jun 17 2022 [AAAN]
55C0500 SALT CREEK BIKE PATH 0 4 Ml E CROWN VL Y PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #14
View of the bridge underclearance on \he bike palh.

Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance
,_,
lb/trans
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0506

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
STRUCTURE NAME:

PASEO DE COLINAS OH

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE

0.1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY (7) FACILITY CARRIED
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
33°32'52.35" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
117°40'29.03" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK 7 GOOD DECK AREA (M)2
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
INSPECTION DATE:

June 17, 2022

PASEO DE COLINAS

SCRRA,BNSF RY,AMTRAK,ETC
ON 150000000

NOT ON NHS
1,639
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 79.1
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION 100

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA (113)SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (05/20/2020) Routine-Elevation View (05/20/2020) Routine-Underside View (04/12/2022) Routine-Map View (04/12/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L. Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.Wongsavanh/VL.Dang
12/1/2022
Vinh-duc L. Dang (Registered c· Date
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 1 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T 1965 (45) MAIN SPANS
(106) YEAR MODIFIED 1985 (46) APPR SPANS
(34) SKEW 20 (48) MAX SPAN (M)
(49) LENGTH (M) 86.4 (35) STR FLARE
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH y JOINTS

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
N/A
N/A
5 0

22.4 0-NO
0 B)UNDERWATERINSP

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR
{44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR
NO. OF HINGES
N-NO
N-NO
MO B)
MOC)
N/A
N/A
2: CONCRETE CONT
05: BOX BEAM OR GDR - MU
0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
0 Original structure (1965, south side): Five span continuous CIP RC T-girders (4) supported by single column bents and RC diaphragm abutments. All on steel shell RC piles.

Widening structure (1985, north side): Five span continuous CIP RC box girder (4 cells) supported on RC double column bents and RC diaphragm abutments. All on driven concrete piles.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
Original: (W) 41.47 ft, 58.21 ft, 53.21 ft, 73.43 ft, 32.12 ft (E) Widen: (W) 38.81 ft, 73.43 ft, 58.53 ft, 73.43 ft, 38.81 ft (E)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64) OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS
5 MS 18 (HS 20) (65)CALC METHOD
RF= 0.78 (63)CALC METHOD
RF= 1.01 (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING

OVERLAY THICKNESS

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Speed
Legal
Legal
Legal
45 Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 12/19/17
Load Rating Type Calculated
Posting
Signs
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.8.2 AASHTO - 12/19/17
2 inches
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
MPH
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF H-HIGHWAY 0.6 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF H-HIGHWAY 7.54 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 2 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

DECK AND ROADWAY
The roadway has a sharp curvature after the eastbound departure which impacts traffic speed and sight distance. The speed limit over the bridge is 45 MPH.

SUBSTRUCTURE
At Abutment 1, erosion mitigation has been installed. At both sides of Abutment 6, an erosion gully has formed, up to 1.5 feet deep and

1.5 feet wide along the embankment slope. Refer to Photo 5.

Due to erosion in the past, the piles at both abutments were exposed. A grouted repair was made to prevent further scour and to protect the piles from exposure. The grout repair at Abutment 6 has failed and the piles are exposed again. Refer to Photos 6 and 9.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(N) 1.00 ft br, 5.00 ft sw, 57.25 ft, 1.75 ft br (S)

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 86.4 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN (51) NET WIDTH 17.5 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET (52) TOTAL WIDTH 19.8 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 0.0 M
(32) APPROACH RDWYWIDTH 17.5 M
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN O NO MEDIAN

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
1-CIP CONCRETE
6-BITUMINOUS
0-NONE
0-NONE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 2 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 17400
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCKADT % 4 %
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 6 KM
(114) FUTURE ADT 32603
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2044
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prot Defect
16 1080
Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Printed on : Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
2-2 WAY

99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 17.5 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY
4 MINIMUM TOLERABLE
0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
(20) TOLL
0-NOT ON NET
3-ON FREE ROAD
4 45
N/A
(28a) LANES
SPEED
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
(58) DECK RATING= 7
Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
2 1639 sq.m 1632
2 2 0
3 of 9
3 0
4 2
0 0
55CD506/AAAK/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) DECK RATING= 7 Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 cs 3 CS4
1120 Efflorescence/Rust Staining 2 5 0 3 2 0
510 Deck Wearing Surface-Asphalt 2 1501 sq.m 1438 63 0 0 3220 Cracking-AC (WS) 2 63 0 63 0 0
( 16-1080) Delamination/Spall/ Patched Area
The southerly overhang at Span 3 has a spall under the deck that is approximately 10 inches long by 10 inches wide by 0.50 inches deep (1 square foot CS 3). Refer to photos from the 2018 BIR.

The southwest corner of Abutment 1 at the edge of deck has a spall with exposed rebar, approximately 12 inches long by 12 inches wide by 6 inches deep (1 square foot CS 3). Refer to photos from the 2018 BIR. ( 16-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
The soffit of the original T-girder half of the structure has diagonal and transverse cracks approximately 2 feet in length and less than

0.05 inches wide. These cracks are described below:

In Span 1: Bay 1 has one crack and Bay 3 has two cracks. The cracks have gray and light brown efflorescence. (3 cracks x 2 feet long x 1 foot wide = 6 square feet CS 3) In Span 5: Bay 1 has eight cracks, Bay 2 has six cracks, and Bay 3 has two cracks. The cracks have gray and light white efflorescence stains.
(16 cracks x 2 feet long x 1 foot wide = 32 square feet CS 2) In addition to the cracks described above, there are full width cracks with white and light brown efflorescence in Span 1 in all bays (20 square feet CS 3). Refer to the photos in the February 2022 BIR. (16-510-3220) Cracking-AC (WS)
The deck AC overlay has two parallel longitudinal cracks, 0.50 inch wide and spaced less than 1 foot apart, along the entire length of the bridge at the eastbound Lane 1. These cracks occur along the longitudinal joint between the original and widened decks. (282 feet [Crack Length] x 2 [Number of Cracks] = 562 square feet CS 2) There are full width tranverse cracks up to 0.5 inches wide where the superstructure frames into the bridge abutment at both ends. (58 feet [Roadway Width] x 2 ends of the bridge = 116 square feet CS 2)

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code (36b) Transition O (36c) Appr Guardrail O (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 45 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RA TINGS AND NOTES Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 CS3 CS4
331 Railing-RC 2 173 m 83 81 9
1080 Delamination/Spall/ Patched Area 2 18 0 9 9
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 72 0 72 0
(331 -1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
There are spalls and patches of unsound concrete that are 4 inches to 1 foot in diameter and 0.50 inchs deep on average throughout the left rail. About half the spalls have exposed rebar. Refer to Photos 1 through 4.

These defects cover an estimated 20% of the entire length of the north rail with half classified as CS 2 and half CS 3. (331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The northerly rail has vertical cracks at 2 feet average spacing and horizontal cracks along the top edge of the rail. The southerly rail has vertical cracks at 3 feet average spacing. All cracks are between 0.012 inches to 0.05 inches wide. (0.33 [CAF, 3 feet spacing] x 284 feet [South Rail Length]+ 0.50 [CAF, 2 feet spacing] x 284 feet [North Rail Length]= 235 feet CS 2)

SUPERSTRUCTURE
0 0
0 Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 4 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RA TINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 cs 2 cs 3 cs 4
105 Box Girder-RC 2 86 m 86 0 0 0
(105) Box Girder-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
110 Girder/Beam-RC 2 316 m 316 0 0 0
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
There were no significant defects noted.

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
l-HIGHWAY-WATERWAY-RAILRO (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE 3 INTOLERABLE - CORRECT (111) PIER PROTECTION N/A
9 ABOVE DESIRABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M M

0.0 M
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR
9 NO DEFICIENCIES (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC rectangular.

ROADWAY DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(Sa) POSITION:

N/A
ROADWAY NAME:
(Sd) ROUTE
2 ONE ROUTE UNDER

CAMINO CAPISTRANO NBI UNDER RECORD
(11) POST MILE
(Sb) KIND HIGHWAY
(Sc) LEVEL SERVICE
(10) VERTICAL CLEAR (m)
(47) HORIZONTAL CLEAR (m)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH
(102) DIRECTION TRAFFIC
00000 (104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
0 (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS
5 CITY STREET (100) DEFENSE HWY
0 NONE OF THE BELOW (110) NATIONAL TRUCK NETWORK

7.54 (20) TOLL FACILITY
11 .60 (28b) LANES
10 (29) RECENT ADT
2 2-WAY TRAFFIC (109) TRUCK% ADT

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 NOT NHS
16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL
0 NOT DEF HWY
0 NOT PART OF NATL NETWO
3 ON FREE ROAD
2 20700 (30) ADT YEAR
5 (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7
2019
Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect
215
1080
1130
(215) Abutment-RC
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. (215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
aty c s 1 c_s.2________cs 3 CSA_
2 62 m 60 2 0 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
The right (southerly) shear key at Abutment 6 has unsound concrete 3 feet by 1 foot in size (3 square feet CS 2). Refer to Photo 7.

Abutment 6 has an incipient spall approximately 2 feet by 8 inches in size and located under the longitudinal joint between the original and widened structure. Refer to Photo 11 ,
Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 5 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES {60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty CS 1..____CS ? CS 3-________CS 4
(215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment 1 has a diagonal crack, 2 feet long and 0.04 inches wide with gray efflorescence under Girder 4 (1 square foot CS 2).

Abutment 1 northwesterly wing wall has map pattern cracks. The cracks are 0.04 inches wide on average and spaced at 18 inches along a 6 feet long portion (4 square feet CS 2)
227 Pile-RC 2 2 ea. 2 0 0 0
(227) Pile-RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. Two piles are exposed under the southerly portion of Abutment 5. There is no indication of pile distress noted in any substructure element. 234 Pier Cap-RC 2 29 m 29 0 0 0
(234) Pier Cap-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
254 Column Shell-Full Ht 2 12 ea. 12 0 0 0
515 Steel Coating-Paint 2 168 sq.m 168 0 0 0
(254) Column Shell-Full Ht
There were no significant defects noted.
(254-515) Steel Coating-Paint
There were no significant defects noted.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 6 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1
Defects on the left rail over Span 2.

Photo 3
Defects on the left rail over Span 4.

Photo 5
Erosion gully at the northeasterly corner.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 0944 AM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Defects on the left rail at Bent 4.

Photo 4
Typical cracks and unsound concrete on the left rail.

Photo 6
Broken and missing concrete cover in front of the piles at the base of Abutment 6.
7 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 7
Unsound concrete at the right shear key of Abutment 6.

Photo 9
Gap at the base of Abutment 6 at the southerly half of the structure.

Photo 11
Cracks and water stains at the longitudinal joint at Abutment 6.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Photo 8
Right overhang, looking westerly standing at the southeasterly corner.

Photo 10
Efflorescence crack in Bay 3 (southernmost) in Span 5 near Bent 5.
8 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
-NONE
-NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 04/28/2018 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Sub-Misc.

Est Cost
StrTarget ROUTINE
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Dist Target
EA
There is erosion of the slope at both sides of Abutment 6 resulting in exposure of the original footing. Backfill the slope and lace concrete slo e avement with er draina e to revent further erosion and underminin

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 9 of 9 55C0506/AAAK/87976 55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY Jun 17. 2022 [AAAK] Photo #1
Defects on the left rail over Span 2.
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Defects on the left rail at Bent 4
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK)
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Defects on the left rail over Span 4,
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55CD506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH D.1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #4
Typical cracks and unsound concrete on the left rail ,
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Erosion gully at the northeasterly corner
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH 0.1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Broken and missing concrete cover in front of the piles at the base of Abutment 6.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
SSC0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Unsound concrete at the right shear key of Abutment 6
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH D 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #8
Right overhang, looking westerty standing at the southeasterly corner.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH 0.1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #9
Gap at the base of Abutment 6 at the souther1y half of tl1e stru cture.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAI<]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OH 0.1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Effiorescence crack in Bay 3 (southernmost) in Span 5 near Bent 5.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
55C0506 PASEO DE COLINAS OHO 1 Ml N OF AVERY PKWY
133 - Unclassified
Photo #11
Cracks and water stains at the longitudinal joint at Abutment 6.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAK]
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance
Et;
lb/trans
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0612

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
STRUCTURE NAME:

EQUESTRIAN UC

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD (7) FACILITY CARRIED
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
33°31 '07.54" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
117°42'16.99" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58) DECK N N/A (NBI) DECK AREA (M)2
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
ON
INSPECTION DATE:

June 17, 2022

MARINA HILLS DRIVE

EQUESTRIAN UC
150000000

NOT ON NHS
401
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
5 FAIR SUFFICIENCY RATING 87.0
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE (113)SCOUR N NOT OVER WATERWAY

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (06/17/2022) Routine-Elevation View (06/17/2022) j I 1'-::'::::l::i::::::)-
Routine-Underside View (06/17/2022) Routine-Map View (03/28/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L. Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.Wongsavanh/VL.Dang
12/1/2022
Date
Printed on Thursday 12/01/2022 08:44 AM Page 1 of 6 55C0612/AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22)OWNER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T
(106) YEAR MODIFIED
(34)SKEW
(49) LENGTH (M)
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
1980
N/A
0 7.9
y
(45) MAIN SPANS
(46) APPR SPANS
(48) MAX SPAN (M)
(35) STR FLARE
JOINTS
N/A
N/A
0 7.6
0-NO
0 B)UNDERWATERINSP

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR
NO. OF HINGES
N-NO
N-NO
MO B)
MOC)
N/A
N/A
3: STEEL
11: ARCH - DECK
0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
0 Single span 25 ft W x 14 ft H x 166 ft L long galvanized corrugated steel bolted multiplate arch culvert (non-grade top culvert) with RC abutment and spread footing under approximately 3 ft of fill and AC paving.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(W) 25.00 ft (E)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64)OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS

POSTING LOADS
0 UNKNOWN (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1 .67 =>54.1 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
6 inches
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Speed
Safe
Loads
Legal
Legal
Legal
45 Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons l A~~~~al Ordinance/Order Requirements
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
MPH
I
A~~~~al Signs
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 10/30/19
Load Rating Type Assign Temp '--~ ~ - ------- - -------- ~ Load Rating Tool - Date SM&I Inspection Procedure Manual Section 5.1 0 - 10/17 /19

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 2 of 6 55C061 2/AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
A complete routine inspection of all visible culvert elements was performed in accordance with SM&I policy and procedures. The deck was inspected by walking along the sidewalks. The culvert was inspected by walking through the structure.

There was less than 1 inch of water at the southerly entrance, pooling along the side curbs of the culvert. The culvert was mostly dry at the time of this inspection.

DECK AND ROADWAY
The AC roadway pavement has longitudinal and transverse cracks less than 0.25 inches wide and spaced 4 to 6 feet apart in all lanes.

MISCELLANEOUS
The concrete base of the rail over the northerly head wall is cracked along the base of the rail. The cracks is 0.02 to 0.04 inches wide.

Refer to Photo 2.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(S) 35.00 ft, 5.00 ft SW, 45.00 ft, 8.00 ft cu med, 35.00 ft, 10.00 ft SW, 22.00 ft (N)

DECK GEOMETRY
(49) LENGTH
(51) NETWIDTH
(52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK

7.9 M

24.4 M

48.8 M
LEFT 3.0 M RIGHT 1.5 M
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 24.4 M
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN 3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE N-NOT APPLICABLE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE N-NOT APPLICABLE
8) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

N-NOT APPLICABLE

N-NOT APPLICABLE
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 6 inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 12500
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT % 3 %
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 3 KM
(114) FUTUREADT
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
21881
2044
5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP

DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0-NOT ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
0-NOT STRAHNET
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY

99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 13.7 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
(20) TOLL
(28a) LANES
SPEED
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
0-NOT ON NET
3-ON FREE ROAD
5 45
N/A
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE (58) DECK RATING= N

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code N (36b) Transition N (36c) Appr Guardrail N (36d) Appr Guardrail End N Roadway Speed 45 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 3 of 6 55C0612/ AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= 5 Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 cs 3 CS4
141 Arch-Steel 2 8 m 4 3 0
1000 Corrosion 2 4 0 3 0
516 Steel Coating-Galvanized 2 640 sq.m 603 7 19 11
3440 Effectiveness (Steel PC) 2 37 0 7 19 11
( 141-1000) Corrosion
The bottom 6 inches to 2 feet of the corrugated galvanized steel lining is rusted along most of the lengths at both sides of the culvert.

There are patches of rust on the corrugated steel at random locations along the length of the culvert. Some connections have surface rust and water stains.

Approximately half of the length of each side is affected by freckle rust and water staining. Approximately one quarter of the length of each side is affected by heavy corrosion and pack rust. Refer to Photos 3 through 10.

Along the length of the arch longitudinal to the travel lanes over the culvert, about 30% of the arch has surface rust and 10% has heavy rusting with section loss or pack rust (7 feet CS 2, 3 feet CS 3). (141-516-3440) Effectiveness (Steel PC)
The arch is rusted along the bottom 6 inches to 2 feet of most of its length.

Approximately 50% of the length of both sides has reduced effectiveness in the rusted region. (166 feet [Culvert Length] x 1.25 feet [Average Rusted Height] x 50% [Affected Length] x 2 sides= 208 square feet CS 3) Approximately 30% of the length of both sides has corroded and ineffective steel coating in the rusted region (166 feet [Culvert Length] x 1.25 feet [Average Rusted Height] x 30% [Affected Length] x 2 sides = 125 square feet CS 4 ).

An additional 1 % of the galvanized steel coating has light freckle rust or water staining at random locations along the length of the culvert. (70 square feet CS 2)

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
(113) SCOUR

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
None.
3-PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL
N NOT APPLICABLE (NB!) (111) PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE
N/A
N NOT APPLICABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
N N/A (NBI) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR N NOT OVER WATERWAY (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE N/A

0.0 M
M

0.0 M
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem DefecU Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prot Defect Qty c_s L____CS 2 C.S~3 CSA.
215 Abutment-RC 2 101 m 101 0 0 0
(215) Abutment-RC
The abutments are not exposed for visual inspection. No signs of distress were noted. 220
1080
Pile Cap/Footing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(220-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
101
20 m 81
0 20
20 0
0 0
0 Along the length of the footing on both sides of the arch, there are spalls less than 6 inches in diameter and less than 1 inch deep.

About 20% of the length of the footing is estimated to have these spalls (66 feet CS 2).

Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page 4 of 6 55C0612/AAAN/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1
Southerly entrance looking northerly.

Rust along the southwesterly portion of the arch culvert.

Photo 5
Typical rust around the center portion of the corrugated metal arch cu Ive rt.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 09:44 AM Page
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Crack in the concrete along the base of the head wall rail at the norther! end.

Photo 4
Rust height at the southwesterly portion of the arch culvert.

Photo 6
Typical rust around the center portion of the corrugated metal arch culvert.
5 of 6 55C0612/AAAN/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 7
Rust and efflorescence at the connection on the easterly side.

Photo 9
Rust at the northeasterly portion of the arch culvert.

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
-NONE
-NONE
Rec Date 03/30/2018
Status PROPOSED
Work By
Action

LOCAL AGENCY
Super-Misc.

Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Photo 8
Rust at the northeasterly portion of the arch culvert.

Photo 10
Connection rust and water stains, northwesterly side.

Est Cost
Str Target ROUTINE
Dist Target
EA
Replace or repair the corrugated galvanized lining along the bottom of the corrugated galvanized lining. The bottom 6 inches to 2 feet of the corrugated galvanized steel lining is rusted along most of the lenath at both sides of the culvert.

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Printed on: Thursday 12/01 /2022 0944 AM
-NONE
-NONE

Page 6 of 6 ends

55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #1
Southerly entrance looking northerly.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55CD6 12 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - U11classified
Crack i11 ihe concrete along the base of tl1e head wall rail at the northerly end.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #3
Rust along the southwesterly portion of the arch culvert, Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Rust height at the southwesterly portion of the arch culvert, Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #5
Typical rust around the center portion of the corrugated metal arch culvert.

Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
SSC0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #6
Typical rust around the center portion of the corrugated metal arch culvert, Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
SSC0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #7
Rust and efflorescence at the connection on the easterly side Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Photo #8
Rust at the northeasterly portion of the arch culvert
Jun 17, 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Rust at the northeasterly portion of the arch culvert
Jun 17. 2022 [AAAN]
55C0612 EQUESTRIAN UC 100' EAST OF NIGUEL ROAD
133 - Unclassified
Co11nect1on rust and water stains northwesterly side.

Jun 17. 2022 [AAAN)
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance
,_,
lb/trans
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0695

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Routine Inspection
STRUCTURE NAME:

EQUESTRIAN UNDERPASS MUOL TON PKWY

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION
(11) POSTMILE
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
250' NW/O CROWN VALLEY PK (7) FACILITY CARRIED
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
33°32'37 .87'' (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
117°41 '33.39" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
INSPECTION DATE:

June 17, 2022

MUOL TON PKWY

EQUESTRIAN UNDERPASS
ON 15100000

ROUTE ON NHS
(58) DECK N N/A (NBI) DECK AREA (M)2 346
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT
(5 FAIR) SUFFICIENCY RATING 87.9
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION N/A

N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE (113)SCOUR N NOT OVER WATERWAY

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine-Roadway View (05/01/2018) Routine-Elevation View (03/28/2022) Routine-Underside View (05/20/2020) Routine-Map View (06/17/2022) TEAM LEADER Vinh-duc L. Dang
REPORT AUTHOR Christopher S. Wongsavanh
INSPECTED BY CS.WongsavanhNL.Dang
12/1/2022
Date
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 1 of 5 55C0695/AAAE/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW

AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A) N/A
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE N/A % SHARE N/A
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUil T
(106) YEAR MODIFIED
(34) SKEW
1989
N/A
0 (45) MAIN SPANS
(46) APPR SPANS
(48) MAX SPAN (M)
N/A
0 7.7
(49) LENGTH (M)
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH

7.7 (35) STR FLARE 0-NO
y JOINTS 0

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

B) UNDERWATER INSP

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR
(44b) DESIGN TYPE APPR
NO. OF HINGES
N-NO
N-NO
MO B)
MOC)
N/A
N/A
3: STEEL
11 : ARCH - DECK
0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
0 Single span 25.25 ft W x 13.45 ft H x 246.00 ft L bolted corrugated steel multi plate arch culvert supported in concrete spread footing (non-grade top) underneath 10.00 ft of earth fill.

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(S) 25.25 ft (N)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

LOAD CAPACITY
(31)DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64)OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS

OVERLAY THICKNESS
Existing
0 UNKNOWN (65)CALC METHOD
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1.67 =>54.1 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
inches
Posting

POSTING LOADS
Safe
Loads Ordinance/Order Signs
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Speed
Legal
Legal
Legal
50 Posting Date N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 10/21 /1 5
Load Rating Type Assign Temp
Load Rating Tool - Date None - 10/21 /15
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons
N/A U.S. Tons

N/A MPH
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
ppppp

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE (53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N-NOT H/RR 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N-NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 2 of 5 55C0695/AAAE/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

CONDITION INFORMATION

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection of all visible bridge elements was performed in accordance with SM&I policy and procedures. The roadway was inspected by walking along the entire roadway section. The superstructure and substructure were inspected by walking under the structure.

The culvert was dry at the time of this inspection. There was up to 4 inches of sediment and soil in the culvert mostly around the footings .

DECK AND ROADWAY
The AC roadway pavement has longitudinal and transverse cracks 5 feet long and up to 0.5 inches wide.

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

DECK AND ROADWAY

DECK CROSS SECTION
(W) 56.00 ft ea., 5.00 ft grass, 10.00 ft sw, 5.00 grass, 118.00 ft , 10.00 sw, 42.00 ft ea (E)

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH
(51) NET WIDTH
(52) TOTAL WIDTH
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

7.7 M (42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 1-HIGHWAY
1-PART OF NET
000000000000

36.0 M (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK

45.0 M
LEFT 3.0 M RIGHT 3.0 M

36.0 M
0 NO MEDIAN

N-NOT APPLICABLE
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 1-ROUTE ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0-NOT STRAHNET
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM (10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY

99.99 M

A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE

C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2019 (109) TRUCK ADT %
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
(114) FUTURE ADT
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 36.0 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
inches (105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0-NOT APPLICABLE
20880 (110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
3 % (20) TOLL 3-ON FREE ROAD
1 KM (28a) LANES 8
25396 SPEED
2044 (103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
50 N/A
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE (58) DECK RATING= N

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL

RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code N (36b) Transition N (36c) Appr Guardrail N (36d) Appr Guardrail End N Roadway Speed 50 MPH

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE

UPERSTRUCTURE

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units
Printed on: Thursday 12/0 1/2022 09:44 AM Page 3 of 5
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= (5)
Qty in each Condition State
55C0695/AAAE/87976
Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING= (5) Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect Qty cs 1 CS2 cs 3 CS4
141 Arch-Steel 2 8 m 6 0 2 0
1000 Corrosion 2 2 0 0 2 0
516 Steel Coating-Galvanized 2 935 sq.m 866 0 55 14
3440 Effectiveness (Steel PC) 2 69 0 0 55 14
(141-1000) Corrosion
The corrugated steel lining plates have corroded at the bottom along the entire length the arch culvert, up to 2 feet high.

There is freckle rust along 60% of the entire length. There are some patches of heavy corrosion with pack rust along 15% of culvert length. Refer to Photos 1 and 2.

About 2 feet within the springlines of the steel corrugated arch, longitudinal to the travel lanes over the culvert, has corrosion present (4 feet CS 3).
(141-516-3440) Effectiveness (Steel PC)
The corrugated steel lining plates have corroded at the bottom along the entire length the arch up to 2 feet high.

Approximately 60% of the length of both sides has reduced effectiveness in the rusted region. (246 feet [Culvert Length) x 2 feet [Rusted Region] x 60% [Affected Length] x 2 sides = 590 square feet CS 3) Approximately 15% of the length of both sides has corroded and ineffective steel coating in the rusted region. (246 feet [Culvert Length] x 2 feet [Rusted Region] x 15% [Affected Length) x 2 sides= 148 square feet CS 4)

SUBSTRUCTURE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
3-PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE (38) NAVIGATION CONTROL
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI) (111) PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE
N/A
N NOT APPLICABLE (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION N NIA (NBI) (116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR (113) SCOUR N NOT OVER WATERWAY (40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE

0.0 M
M

0.0 M

SCOUR POA DATE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
None
NIA
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60)SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7 Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State No. Prat Defect aty c.s 1 c_s , cs 3 c.S.A._
215 Abutment-RC 2 1 50 m 1 50 O O O
(215) Abutment-RC
There were no significant defects noted.
220 Pile Cap/Footing-RC 2 150 m 150 0 0 0
(220) Pile Cap/Footing-RC
There were no significant defects noted.

Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM Page 4 of 5 55C0695/AAAE/87976 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1 Photo 2
Rust at the bottom of the northwesterly steel plates Corrosion of the bottom of the southeasterly steel plates

ORK RECOMMENDATIONS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 02/19/2022 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Status PROPOSED Action Super-Misc.

Est Cost
Str Target ROUTINE
Dist Target
EA
Repair or replace the bottom steel lining plates along each side of the arch culvert. The bottom 2 feet of the galvanized corrugated steel arch is corroded alonq most of the culvert lenqth on both sides.

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Printed on: Thursday 12/01/2022 09:44 AM
-NONE
-NONE

Page 5 of 5 ends

55C0695 EQUESTRIAN UNDERPASS MUOL TON PKWY 250' NW/O CROWN VALLEY PK 133 - Unclassified
Rust at the bottom of the northwesterly steel plates
Mar 28, 2022 [AAAE]
55C0695 EQUESTRIAN UNDERPASS MUO LTON PKWY 250' NW/O CROWN VALLEY PK 133 _ Unclassified
Photo #2 theasterly steel plates Corrosion of the bottom of the sou Mar 28, 2022 [AAAE]

ATTACHMENT C - SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENT/ONA LL Y LEFT BLANK)
City of Laguna Niguel, CA- RFP- CllYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page 26 of 27

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL AND
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ("Agreement") is made and entered into _ _____ _ by and between CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, a California municipal corporation ("City") and ------------------~ a _______________ ("Consultant"). City and Consultant may be referred to individually as "Party" or collectively as "Parties." In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the "services" or "work" hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants: a) all services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent and satisfactory manner; b) all materials used for services will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended; and, c) Consultant shall follow the highest professional standards and practices in performing the services required hereunder.

1.2 Consultant's Proposal and City's RFP. Consultant's proposal or bid for this Agreement ("Consultant's Proposal"), dated ______ _, shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. City circulated a Request for Proposals for the services provided for herein on ______ . City's Request for Proposals ("City's RFP"), which was responded to by Consultant's Proposal, shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. The Scope of Services shall include the scope of services or work included both in Consultant's Proposal as well as in City's RFP. In the event of any inconsistency or any conflict between the terms of Consultant's Proposal (for scope of services or work, or schedule of performance), and the terms of City's RFP (for scope of services or work, or schedule of performance), the Consultant's Proposal shall govern, unless this Agreement provides otherwise. In the event of any inconsistency or any conflict between the terms of Consultant's Proposal, and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. No other terms and conditions from Consultant's Proposal, other than description of scope of services or work, as well as description of schedule of performance, shall apply to this Agreement, unless specifically agreed to by City in writing.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules and regulations of City and any federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time services are rendered.

City, and its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, attorneys, successors and assigns shall not be liable at law or in equity for failure of Consultant to comply with this Section.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain and maintain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the -1-
performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Additional Services and Compensation. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes to the work by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order, consistent with both Section 9.4 as well as the Laguna Niguel Municipal Code, is first given by City to Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work and/or the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Consultant. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants.

1.6 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants Consultant: a) has thoroughly investigated and considered services to be performed, b) has carefully considered how services should be performed, and c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of services under this Agreement.

1.7 Software and Computer Services. If the Scope of Services includes the provision and/or installation of any software, computer system, or other computer technology, Consultant represents and warrants that it is familiar with and/or has inspected City's current infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software and that the software, computer system, or other computer technology provided and/or installed by Consultant under this Agreement is compatible, and shall be fully functional, with such infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software of City. Consultant acknowledges that City is relying on this representation by Consultant as a material consideration in entering into this Agreement.

1.8 Prevailing Wages. If services include any "public work" or "maintenance work," as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant's obligations in Section 5.3 (Indemnification) expressly apply to acts or omissions arising out of, or incidental to, the payment of prevailing wages by any person or entity (including Consultant, its subcontractors, and each of their officers, employees and agents) in connection with any services, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys' fees, and other related costs and expenses. All duties of Consultant pursuant to this section shall survive termination of the Agreement.

1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit -2-
B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit Band any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation (excluding the Contingency Sum), including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Dollars ($ _ ___ ~ ("Compensation
Sum"), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.5. This Agreement includes a contingency amount equal to _ ___ _ percent of the Compensation Sum ("Contingency Sum") to account solely for additional work, or unforeseen conditions, related to the services. The total compensation (including the Contingency Sum), including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed _ _ _____ ____________ Dollars ($ _____ ~ ("Contract Sum"), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.5. The Consultant shall obtain written approval from the City for any use of the Contingency Sum. Compensation may include reimbursement, for actual and necessary expenditures, if both specified in the Schedule of Compensation, as well as approved by City in advance. Upon expiration of original term of the Agreement, if term is extended (pursuant to Section 3.2 or otherwise), fees and rates may only be increased both pursuant to Section 9.4 as well as subsequent to negotiation between the Parties on a reasonable increase. The maximum of such increase shall be no greater than the CPI increase (Orange County area) for the applicable period of time. City has no obligation or duty to provide any such increase. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City.

Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services, Consultant shall promptly notify the City Representative of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

2.2 Invoices. Unless some other method of payment is specified in Exhibit B, Special Requirements, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first business day of such month, Consultant shall submit to City, in a form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. Except as provided in Sections 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and City will use its best efforts to make payment no later than forty-five ( 45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. Each invoice is to include (unless otherwise specified by City): I) line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate; 2) line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the services; 3) line items for all other approved reimbursable -3-
expenses claimed, with supporting documentation; and 4) line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the services.

ARTICLE3.PERFORMANCESCHEDULE

3.0 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.1 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services. The term of this Agreement may be extended administratively (with total cumulative extension no greater than two years), by the City pursuant to Section 9.4 and without the need for further approval by the City Council, if the Consultant's performance is satisfactory and it is in the best interest of the City.

3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Maieure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, (with the express exception of delays arising from the impact of COVID-19 and its variants to the extent such impact is foreseeable or should have reasonably been foreseeable), if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify City in writing of the causes of the delay.

City shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of City such delay is justified. City's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant's sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Consultant Representative. The Consultant Representative is who
is authorized to act on Consultant's behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be -4-
replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 City Representative. The City Representative is such person as designated by the City Manager or her designee. The City Representative shall be the primary person on behalf of City responsible for the administration of the Agreement. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of both the progress of the performance of the services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

4.3 Approvals from City. City approvals or actions, pursuant to the authority of this Agreement, may be made (unless otherwise specified) either by the City Manager, the _ _______ Director, or by the City Representative (or by their respective delegates as provided for in writing).

4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City, nor any of its officers, employees or agents, shall have any control over the manner or means by which Consultant, or its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain under only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it, or any of its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are officers, employees or agents of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive control and direction.

No City employee benefits shall be available to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with the performance of this Agreement. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In the event that Consultant or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees' Retirement System, to be classified as other than an independent contractor for City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor Consultant used to provide services under this Agreement, is/are employees of City.

4.5 Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, without express written approval of City, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part services required hereunder without express written approval of City, and neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred or assigned. No approved transfer shall release Consultant, or any surety or insured of Consultant, of any liability hereunder without express written consent of City. -5-
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages. Prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, and without limiting Consultant's indemnification obligation to City, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, for the duration of the Agreement, primary policies of insurance of the type and amounts below, issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by City, which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, attorneys, successors and assigns of City. City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation. (a) Commercial General Liability Insurance. A policy of commercial general liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office ("ISO") form CG 00 01, written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. Coverage for an additional insured shall not be limited to its vicarious liability. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate.
(b) Worker's Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker's compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement.
(c) Automobile Liability. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance, at least as broad as ISO form CA 00 0 I, written on a per occurrence basis covering bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile.
(d) Cyber Technology Errors and Omissions Liability. Cyber Technology Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made" basis and must include coverage for contractual liability. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement. The cyber technology errors and omissions liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to unauthorized release of information for which an identity has the legal obligation to keep private, such as personally identity information (PII); unauthorized use of, access to, or tampering with computer systems, including hacker or denial of service attacks; failure of technology products (software and hardware) required under the contract for Consultant to properly perform the -6-
intended services; failure of computer security that result in the transmission of malicious code, deletion, destruction or alteration of data, or the denial of service; personal injury, plagiarism or misappropriation of ideas, domain name infringement or improper deep-linking or framing, and infringement or violation of intellectual property rights; and rendering, or failure to render, professional services. The policy shall provide coverage for defense costs in regulatory proceedings (state and federal) involving a violation of privacy law or intellectual property rights and crisis management and other expert services. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 3-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate. (e) Cyber Liability. Cyber liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession and the services hereunder, written on a per occurrence basis, with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss, and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations undertaken by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving: infringement of intellectual property; copyright; trademark; invasion of privacy violations; data breach; electronic information theft, loss, damage, destruction, alteration or misuse; release of private information; extortion; and, network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses, with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.
(t) Excess Liability and Umbrella Liabilitv Insurance. Excess liability insurance and/or umbrella liability insurance may be used to satisfy the obligations herein. If excess liability insurance is used then the policy shall meet all the requirements herein and be at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth herein. Such policy shall: 1) include a drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason; 2) be payable on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; 3) have concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; 4) "follow form" to the underlying primary policies; and, 5) provide insureds, under primary policies required herein, shall be insureds under the excess liability policy. (g) Subcontractors. In the event Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, Consultant shall either: 1) include each subcontractor as insureds under its policies of insurance required herein; or, 2) Consultant shall, upon request of City, furnish to City all documentation, required in Article 5 for Consultant, for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements herein.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of Insurance, Enforcement and Notice. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until both Consultant has provided City with insurance certificates, endorsement forms and appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages, as well as said documentation is approved by City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of, and endorsements to, all required insurance policies, at any time.

Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. In the event any insurance policy required -7-
under this Agreement is cancelled or amended (and the insurance policy is not replaced pursuant to subsection (b) below), or does not comply with Article 5, then: 1) City has the right but not the duty to obtain insurance required herein and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments; or, 2) City, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, may immediately tenninate this Agreement. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required insurance policies. (b) Cancellation/ Amendment. All of herein required policies of insurance shall provide the insurance may not be amended or cancelled by insurer or any Party hereto without providing thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice (with exception of ten (10) calendar days prior written notice for nonpayment of premium) to City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are amended or cancelled, Consultant shall, five (5) business days prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance, or reinstatement of policy, in conformance with this Agreement to City.
(c) Additional lnsureds. The commercial general liability policy provided for in Section 5.1 (a) and the automobile liability policy provided for in Section 5. l(c) both shall name City and its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and designated volunteers ("City Parties") as additional insureds and such coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City and City Parties. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability, and policies of insurance shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (d) Primary, Subrogation. Contribution and Coverage. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance. The insurers (with exception of professional liability insurer) for above policies, Consultant and any subcontractors are all deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution they may have against City or City Parties, and their respective insurers, and all insurance policies required herein shall be endorsed to waive such rights. Any insurance maintained by City or City Parties will apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum amounts provided herein, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City and City Parties.

None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with this Agreement if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained herein are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any Party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. (e) Limitations, Self- Insured Retention and Deductibles. Consultant agrees that requirements of Article 5 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property -8-
resulting from Consultant's activities or the act1v1t1es of any person or persons for which Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit Consultant's indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. All insurance policies must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy any self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention (without impairment of obligation of primary insured under this Agreement to satisfy any selfinsured retention). Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City's option, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City and City Parties, or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, attorney's fees, defense expenses and claims.

5.3 Indemnification.
(a) General Obligations. Consultant agrees, to the full extent permitted by law, to immediately indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, attorneys, successors and assigns (each an "Indemnitee" and collectively, "Indemnitees") against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages or injuries to persons or property, demands, expenses, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities of any kind that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of, pertaining to, incident to or in connection with any alleged acts, errors or omissions of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (each an "lndemnitor" and collectively, "Indemnitors") in connection with the performance of Consultant's Services, or arising from Indemnitors' reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from lndemnitors' negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operations or activities provided herein, or any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, with such negligence or failure to perform to be determined by the City (herein "Claims or Liabilities"), and in connection therewith: 1) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed or threatened in connection with any such Claims or Liabilities, or at option of lndemnitees will reimburse and pay for all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith; and, 2) Consultant will promptly pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree rendered against Indemnitees, and reimburse Indemnitees for the cost of any settlement paid by lndemnitees, for any such Claims or Liabilities, and will save and hold Indemnitees harmless therefrom.
(b) Further Provisions. The indemnity obligation herein shall be binding on successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements as provided herein with its subcontractors, and if Consultant fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefor. Failure of City and/or City Parties (collectively "City" for solely this Section 5.3(b)) to monitor compliance with any of the indemnification provisions herein shall not be a waiver hereof. The indemnification provisions herein do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City's negligence, except that design professionals' indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities -9-
arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnification provided herein includes Claims or Liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services hereunder. Payment of invoices by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of the indemnity obligation herein. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Consultant will be obligated to pay for City's defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City as solely negligent or responsible for willful misconduct.

Consultant will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney's fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under Section 5.3 of this Agreement. Such offset, if any, does not satisfy any amount, greater than the offset, due to City from Consultant. (c) Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's services, to the fullest extent permitted by law (within the limitations, as applicable, of Civil Code section 2782.8), Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Indemnitees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all Claims and Liabilities, consistent with all obligations provided for in this Section 5.3, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder ("books and records") as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable City to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such books and records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (and, as applicable, maintained also in accordance with requirements of Labor Code section 1776), shall be complete and detailed, and shall be readily accessible. City shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts. Such books and records shall be maintained either for a period of no less than three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, or for such period of time as required by applicable law, whichever period of time is longer. City shall have access to such books and records in the event any audit is required. Consultant shall fully cooperate with City in providing access to any and all Consultant records and documents if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically submit written reports to City Representative concerning performance of services, upon request, and/or as necessary for City to be informed of both performance of services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, -I 0-
photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials ("documents and materials") prepared (regardless of whether complete or incomplete) by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of City and/or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership, use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents and materials under express condition that Consultant agrees such documents and materials are the sole property of City. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents and materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, with respect to any Consultant documents and materials that may qualify as "works made for hire" as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed "works made for hire" for City.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain prior to such gain or production.

Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from City. No news releases, including photographs, public announcements, or confirmations of the same, of any part of the work, shall be made without prior written authorization from City. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from City or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant immediately gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. As concerning, regarding or related to, in any way, this Agreement and the work performed thereunder: a) Consultant shall immediately notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party; b) City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding; and, c) Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant, however, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of -I I-
California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S.

District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, Southern Division, in the County of Orange, State of California.

7.3 Default of Consultant and Opportunity to Cure. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively ten (10) days, but may be extended, or reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices, without liability for interest. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe, City may immediately both terminate this Agreement with notice to Consultant as well as pursue the remedy in Section 7.4, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.4 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7 .3, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City therefor.

7.5 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to -12-
third parties, by reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant's obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement of this Agreement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

7.7 Rigbts and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.8 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. Attorneys' fees shall include attorneys' fees on any appeal, and a Party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, consultants' fees, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. Such fees and costs shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY, CONFLICTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City -13-
shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of City. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. City, in its sole discretion, shall determine the existence of a conflict of interest and may terminate this Agreement in the event such a conflict of interest exists upon sending Consultant written notice describing the conflict.

No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects their financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account ofrace, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices. Any notice or other communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person in regards to this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in the case of City addressed to _ ______ Director at City of Laguna Niguel, _____________ _., Laguna Niguel, CA 92677, and in the case of Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement, headings used, or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
-14-

9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties as to the Agreement.

It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, concerning this Agreement, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, approved by City and Consultant, and consistent with the Laguna Niguel Municipal Code.

9.5 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 No Undue Influence. Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer or employee of City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of City has or will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to remedies in Section 7.4 and any and all remedies at law or equity.

9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
-15-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

ATTEST:

Marissa J. Asistin, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL,
CALIFORNIA:

Scott C. Smith, City Attorney
CITY:

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, a California
municipal corporation
Tamara S. Letourneau, City Manager
CONSULTANT:
a ------------------
By:---------------
Name:

Title:

By: ______________ _
Name:

Title:

Address: ------------
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairperson of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.)

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT'S BUSINESS ENTITY.
-16-

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

II. Consultant will perform services, described in Consultant's Proposal and City's RFP (refer to Section 1.2 for conflicts), and as specified in more detail below.

III. Consultant will perform the following services:

IV. As part of the services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to City:

V. During performance of the services, Consultant will keep City informed of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

VI. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the services:

A(l)

EXHIBITB

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Agreement Template)
TBD
B(l)

EXHIBITC

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. City will compensate Consultant for the services performed upon submission of a valid invoice, as described in Section 2.2.

II. The total compensation for the services shall not exceed the total of the Contract Sum, as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

III. Consultant will be compensated for services provided pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with description in Consultant's Proposal.

C(l)

EXHIBITD

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services and deliver all work products timely in accordance with the schedule described in Consultant's Proposal and City's RFP (refer to Section 1.2 for conflicts).

D(l)

ATTACHMENT D -BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (BPMP)

GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL AGENCIES
{REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
City of Laguna Niguel, CA - RFP - CITYWIDE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE INSPECTION SERVICES Page27 of27 California Department of Transportation
Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) Guidelines for Local Agencies April 2024
Background
On January 11, 2002, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) memo announced that Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds may be obligated for Preventive Maintenance (PM) on Federal-aid highway bridges (other than bridges on roads classified as local roads or rural minor collectors) under Section 309 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 ( codified as 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 116{d)). According to 23 U.S.C. 116(d), a PM activity is eligible for federal assistance if the State demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the activity is a costeffective means of extending the useful life of a Federal-aid highway.

In August of 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.

SAFETEA-LU extended reimbursable systematic bridge preventive maintenance activities to include bridges off the Federal-aid system (local streets and rural minor collectors). Effectively, this means all non-toll public highway bridges with spans greater than 20 feet and toll bridges meeting the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 144(1) are eligible to receive HBP funding for preventive maintenance activities.

On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) was passed by Congress and signed into law. MAP-21 continued PM for bridges under 23 U.S.C. 114(a)(1 )(B).

On December 4, 2015, Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was passed by Congress and signed into law. FAST Act continued PM for bridges under 23 U.S.C. 144(a)(1 )(B).

On November 15, 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, was signed into law. IIJA continued PM for bridges under 23 U.S.C. 144(a)(1 )(B).

These BPMP Guidelines are a specific subsection of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Chapter 6 that provides additional information for local agencies to utilize in determining how to request HBP funds to keep their bridges in good condition. Refer to LAPG Chapter 6 regarding other HBP procedures and guidelines such as project prioritization, project delivery, acronyms, reimbursement rates, Bridge Investment Credit, etc.

Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program Goals and Overview The BPMP Goals are to:

1. Maintain the existing inventory of bridges in good or fair condition rating.

2. Correct structural deficiencies in a bridge's life before requiring costly rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement.

3. Extend the service life of existing bridges.

4. Make efficient use of limited resources.

Preservation of structural serviceability is a key element of the program. PM treatments include reducing the amount of water infiltrating the bridge, protecting the bridge elements, slowing the rate of deterioration, and repair of scour countermeasures. PM activities should concentrate on treating bridges in fair or good condition and showing no more than minor structural distress. PM

Page 2 of 9 ends

activities should not degrade any structural or geometric safety aspects of the facility. PM techniques and strategies should be easily constructible to minimize traffic disruption and should provide relief from intensive or frequent repair activity.

The local agency must have qualified staff or a consultant contract to implement a BPMP project.

Consultant contracting must be in compliance with the LAPM. Minimum qualifications for staff or consultants for implementing a BPMP project are:

1. Be professionally licensed civil engineers in California.

2. Have expertise in bridge PM projects.

3. Have expertise in interpreting information in the Bridge Inspection Report (BIR), including element level inspection information and structural defect information.

Local agencies may partner with other local agencies to implement a BPMP project. In these cases, the name of the local agency implementing (project sponsor) the project must be identified.

Local agencies must develop objective procedures to prioritize their preventive maintenance projects. These procedures must be included in the project files for review in future audits. The highest priority projects should include scour countermeasures (streambed degradation or localized scour) and the repair and restoration of structural elements. Priority should be given to bridges that are not eligible for rehabilitation or replacement under the Highway Bridge Program.

Bridges that are currently programmed for rehabilitation or replacement generally are not eligible for funding under BPMP. Local agencies may still apply for a PM project, but justification must be provided at time of application. The work should be limited to the minimum needed to keep the bridge operable until the rehabilitation or replacement project can be advertised.

Local agencies are required to identify the deficiencies or safety issues prior to initiating a PM project. Local agencies must review their complete bridge inventory to ensure project delivery, management, and fiscal efficiencies are leveraged. For example, if multiple bridges have similar deficiencies and needs, it is advantageous to complete the work for all bridges under one preventive maintenance plan.

There are 2 types of BPMP projects, a BPMP Plan Development and a BPMP Bridge List. Both are discussed in the subsequent sections. LAPG 6-A and 6-D forms are not to be submitted for BPMP Bridge List projects.

BPMP Plan Development
BPMP Plan Development projects provide federal aid to local agencies to evaluate their complete local bridge inventory to assess the needs of each structure. Funding to complete the BPMP Plan Development will be provided only once per local agency. The intent is to fund the initial assessment of their complete local bridge inventory, and then subsequently, the local agency should keep their inventory assessment up to date. These are one-time projects per local agency who have never completed a BPMP project before. BPMP Plan Development projects are limited to the Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase and must be completed within 3 years of authorization.

If the Plan Development project is not completed within three years of PE authorization, the local agency must pay back the federal funds expended.

Page 3 of 9 ends

Completed Plan Development projects will result in one or more BPMP Bridge Lists to be reviewed and approved by HBP managers. BPMP Bridge Lists are discussed in the subsequent section.

After review and approval by HBP managers for the completion of a Plan Development project, the local agency may apply for a BPMP Bridge List project for HBP project prioritization. Such applications are still subject to the HBP project prioritization process and schedule. The completion of a BPMP Plan Development project does not automatically result in the acceptance of a BPMP Bridge List project.

To begin a BPMP Plan Development project, a local agency must submit a letter of request to the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) to program a such project. This letter must address the number of bridges owned by the local agency, how much funding will be needed for the Plan Development project, and if they have existing bridges programmed under the HBP.

Reimbursable work cannot commence until after the local agency has received notice that the work is authorized. The federal reimbursement rate is 100% of the eligible Plan Development cost.

BPMP Bridge List
BPMP Bridge List projects provide federal aid to local agencies to perform preventive maintenance measures on identified bridges. A BPMP Plan Development project with the HBP is not required to be completed prior to application of a BPMP Bridge List project. Local agencies may, and are strongly encouraged to, assess their inventory to determine the preventive maintenance needs with local funds.

BPMP Bridge List projects consist of a list of identified bridges with specific work descriptions and requested costs for each bridge. Federal aid may be provided to each bridge in the PE and CON phases under a BPMP Bridge List project.

Steps and details to implementing a BPMP Bridge List project:

1. Local agency staff must perform a detailed review of their bridge inventory and official Bl Rs to determine if there are preventive maintenance work recommendations, based on these BPMP Guidelines.

2. Local agency staff must consider and determine how to group the bridges with preventive maintenance needs into distinct BPMP Bridge List project applications. For new BPMP Bridge List applications, each submitted application may only consist of bridges with a similar scope such that the work for all bridges can be administered and completed under 1 contract (PE and CON). Separate applications must be submitted for each list that is to be administered separately by contract.

In cases where there is only 1 bridge to be delivered, a standalone preventive maintenance application may be submitted through the LAPG 6-A application process.

These projects should be avoided as they do not leverage the benefits of economies of scale of grouped projects.

3. Local agencies must consider all necessary PM measures for each bridge at the time of developing BPMP Bridge List projects to leverage economical efficiencies. For example, joint seal replacements should be done at the same time as deck methacrylate. It is the expectation that a bridge does not apply for another HBP or BPMP project in the next 10

Page 4 of 9 ends

years upon completion of a preventive maintenance project.

4. Clear accounting and expenditure records must be maintained for each individual bridge when managing a project with multiple bridges. This includes funds used for any phase of work on each bridge in the list.

5. The total cost of a BPMP Bridge List must exceed $200,000.

6. Cost estimates shown on the applications must be rounded to the nearest thousands.

Estimates may be more precise to the nearest dollar only when a final list for final invoicing is submitted or if a bridge expended PE funds but is no longer going to construction.

7. The BPMP Bridge List must be submitted to the DLAE electronically in both PDF and Excel format. Refer to the BPMP Bridge List Template for use of BPMP Bridge List submittals and instructions. The federal reimbursement rate is 80% of the eligible BPMP project cost.

Each BPMP Bridge List must comply with the following:
a. Each Bridge List must list: the owner, the NBI bridge number, the facility carried and intersected, the NBI bridge condition status, the work description, the date of the official BIR used at the time of the submittal, the requested participating PE, CON and total costs, and the non-participating costs. Refer to the BPMP Bridge List template for further instructions.
b. All references to cost must include indirect costs (see Chapter 5 of the LAPM), if applicable. Construction costs must include contingency and construction engineering. Contingency is set at 25% of the construction costs for programming purposes for new BPMP Bridge List applications. Contingency is set at 10% of the construction cost for revised BPMP Bridge Lists that are within 1 year of construction authorization.
c. Costs included in the spreadsheet should include a cost escalation factor as approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). Please refer to the HBP website for the latest approved escalation factor.

8. Once a BPMP Bridge List project has been accepted into the HBP, additional bridges cannot be added to the same list. Local agencies must exercise due diligence to ensure all bridges are included in each application as necessary at the time of application.

9. A revised BPMP Bridge List may be submitted throughout the project delivery phase to request a cost and/or schedule change. Revised BPMP Bridge Lists may not exceed more than 1 submittal per calendar year.

10. All BPMP Bridge List applications must be accompanied by a cover letter on a local agency letterhead acknowledging compliance with these program guidelines. The cover letter must be signed by the local agency who is the project sponsor. Sample cover letters are provided on the HBP website. Caltrans will review the Bridge List applications for eligibility per BPMP Guidelines.
11 . All Federal-aid requirements in the LAPM and LAPG Chapter 6 must be followed. BPMP

Page 5 of 9 ends

projects are not subject to the mandatory field review and type selection reviews outlined in LAPG Chapter 6.

Eligible Preventive Maintenance Activities
Local agencies must justify PM work for each specific bridge. A BPMP Bridge List should have multiple bridges with similar work requirements for inventory management and economic efficiencies. For audit purposes, the records must be maintained by local agencies in compliance with Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).

Careful evaluation of all deficiencies and work recommendations identified in BIR is required to properly scope an appropriate PM project. The most current BIR for each structure must be attached to all BPMP Bridge List applications. Bridge List applications without BIRs will be returned to the local agency. Revised BPMP Project Lists do not require Bl Rs attached.

Only official BIRs are accepted; separate local agency or consultant produced inspection reports will not be accepted. Work recommendations documented in the BIR that is not routine maintenance may be eligible for reimbursement under the BPMP. Work recommendations not documented in the BIR may be eligible but must be approved by the HBP, with a recommendation from Structure Local Assistance (SLA). The evaluation must be included as part of the documentation justifying the PM project.

The following are specific work items eligible for HBP reimbursement under the BPMP Guidelines:

1. Expansion joint reconstruction or replacement. Bridge joint elements in condition states 2, 3 or 4, as shown in the BIR, are eligible.

2. Deck Work
a. Seal Concrete Deck. Deck cracking defect in condition states 2, 3 or 4, as shown in the BIR, are eligible. Sealing bridge deck is usually done by using methacrylate.

If polyester overlay is requested and not stated in the BIR, Structure Local Assistance (SLA) should be contacted for concurrence.
b. Concrete deck overlays or similar protective deck overlays. Concrete decks should be field assessed for reinforcing bar cover depths, spalling, delamination, and severe cracking. Deck restoration as required, includes removal of asphalt concrete (AC) and unsound concrete. Full concrete deck replacement is not eligible as a PM activity and may be funded through the general bridge rehabilitation program in Chapter 6 of the LAPG.
c. Deck Asphalt Concrete removal. Wearing surfaces in condition state 3 or 4, as shown in the BIR, are eligible. If the BIR indicates significant signs of AC deterioration and includes a work recommendation for replacement, it is recommended that the AC is removed, and a deck sealant or polyester concrete overlay be considered. Placing AC onto bridge decks is not eligible. d. If the deck overlay alters the bridge deck elevation, the participating approach roadway work (adding or removing approach pavement) to tie into the new elevation must be kept to a minimum and must not exceed 50 feet. Any additional roadway work exceeding 50 feet is non-HBP participating and is the fiscal obligation of the local agency. The intent of the BPMP is to correct structural deficiencies, not to correct roadway profiles.
e. When deck work alters deck elevations, consideration should be taken to taper the

Page 6 of 9 ends

overlay so as not to alter the bridge rail height.

3. Bridge bearings and supports. Restore or replace the existing bearings to make them functional and repair or rehabilitate bearing supports. Bearings in condition state 3 or 4, as shown in the BIR, are eligible.

4. Steel Components. Repair, restoration , and strengthening of major structural elements such as beams, piers, and end caps. Bridge strengthening is to eliminate the need for posting, mitigate further fatigue damage, increase fatigue life, and/or replace or strengthen main load carrying members.

5. Concrete Components. Repair of significant concrete spalls that have structural impacts on the longevity of the bridge. If the BIR indicates significant concrete spalls and includes a work recommendation for repair, then it is eligible.

6. Timber Components. Replacement, or supplementation of timber structural elements, timber deck runners, timber piles are eligible. Repair, replacement, or supplementation of timber railings are not eligible as it is considered routine maintenance.

7. Movable bridge mechanical/electrical components that relate to the structural and mechanical operation that are damaged or worn out may be repaired or replaced.

Moveable bridge eligibility must be reviewed by the SLA.

8. Spot painting of structural steel elements, where the Paint Condition Index (PCI) is greater than 70. If the PCI is less than or equal to 70 (major painting effort), the project will be processed under HBP procedures in Chapter 6 of the LAPG. PM painting cannot be justified for solely aesthetic reasons. A work recommendation for paint must be identified in the BIR to be eligible under BPMP.

9. Existing Scour Countermeasure. Preventive maintenance work of restoring existing Rock Slope Protection (RSP) may be eligible. The construction work must be engineered using current Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC-23) methods and must be able to change the NBI 113 code to 4 or greater.

10. Caltrans, on a case-by-case basis, can review other scopes of work not documented in the BIR. Examples may include Alkali-silica-reactive aggregate mitigation, corrosion management systems, and fracture critical element replacement/rehabilitation. These items will be subject to Structures Maintenance and Investigations and/or SLA recommendations and HBP manager approval. Local agencies must contact their DLAE for assistance.
11 . First time development of BPMP plans. See BPMP Plan Development section for more details.

Ineligible Activities - Bridge Barriers, Routine Maintenance, Etc.

The intent of the BPMP is not to upgrade substandard bridge rails to Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) compliance. The replacement of bridge railings in good or fair condition to upgrade to crash tested standards is not eligible under BPMP.

Page 7 of 9 ends

Routine maintenance is the responsibility of the local agency and is not eligible for HBP or other Federal-aid Highway Program funding . Routine bridge maintenance is defined as regularly scheduled activities to preserve the bridge components in their present or intended condition and generally includes work that is normally done by in-house bridge maintenance crews.

The following are specific work items not eligible for HBP reimbursement under the BPMP Guidelines:

1. Repair, replacement, painting, or new construction of the following:
a. Bridge barrier, railing, fence, or sidewalk as it does not extend the service life of the bridge.
b. Damaged bridge railing due to collisions
c. Transition railing, approach guardrails, end crash cushion systems d. Timber railing
e. Metal beam guard rail systems
f. Warning signs and object markers
g. Modifications to bridge rails needed due to bridge deck work

2. Painting over graffiti, graffiti removal, placement of anti-graffiti coating.

3. Repair or replacement of bridge components due to damage from fires, vehicles, or humans.

4. Work associated with the repair of bridge components, installation of preventive measures, or debris removal due to homeless-related activities.

5. Clearing of brush and vegetation overgrowth.

6. Bearing lubrication.

7. Minor concrete repairs (such as minor concrete spalls that have insignificant structural impacts on the longevity of the bridge or culvert). Generally, epoxy injecting into cracks is not eligible. There may be rare cases where epoxy injecting into substructure cracks in marine environments may be eligible. Generally, crack repair in culverts is not eligible except for culvert roofs that are also the riding surface.

8. Temporary shoring of bridges for load carrying capacity deficiencies.

9. Cleaning and flushing deck drains and cleaning/clearing debris from:
a. Deck surfaces.
b. Bridge sidewalks and curbs.
c. Debris removal from channel waterway
d. Bearing seats, pier caps, and other structural elements. e. Deck joints.

10. Removing deck asphalt concrete without other PM deck measures.

11. Correcting roadway approaches at the abutments that have settled or dipped.

12. Correcting roadway embankment erosion due to water run-off from the bridge deck or

Page 8 of 9 ends

roadway.

13. Work on existing or constructing new weirs, dikes, fish ladders, and drop structures are not eligible.

14. New installations of structure approach slabs are not eligible.

15. Installation of new scour countermeasures are not eligible for BPMP. Refer to LAPG Chapter 6 for eligible scope regarding implementation of new scour countermeasures.

16. Development of subsequent BPMP plans after the initial BPMP development project.

Design Standards
Design standards for all local assistance projects are defined in Chapter 11 of the LAPM. Local agencies are required to specify the appropriate design standards in their project files for future audit purposes.

Major Scope Changes During the Performance of PM Activities Local HBP may participate in major scope changes of PM projects provided the local agency can demonstrate the need and provide adequate justification. Scope changes are subject to HBP manager review and approval. When specific bridges within a BPMP Bridge List project are no longer BPMP eligible, the LPA must contact the DLAE for assistance (DLAEs in turn will work with HBP Managers).

If PM scope changes from BPMP eligible work to HBP eligible work, the BPMP Bridge List must be modified for the specific bridge. The BPMP Bridge List will continue to show the specific bridge in it, with only the PE expenditures up to the point when it was determined that the work was not BPMP eligible. A change to the work description must indicate the bridge is not eligible for further BPMP funding. A new HBP project must be processed under HBP procedures in Chapter 6 of the LAPG.

Contact
For questions regarding this program, please contact your DLAE.

Page 9 of 9 ends

ATTACHMENT C
Proposals Evaluation Summary
RFP Name:

RFP Issue Date:

Citywide Structural Bridge Inspection Services
February 28, 2025
RFP Due Date: April 10, 2025
No. of Bidders: 6
Proposals Evaluation Summary
Firm Name Evaluation Average
Mark Thomas & Company Inc. (Recommended) 92
T.Y. Lin International 89
Dokken Engineering 88
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 84
Atlas Technical Consulatants, Inc. 73
FEI Assocaites Consilting Engineers 61
Evaluation Ranking
1 2
3 4
5 6

ATTACHMENT D
Professional Services Agreement with
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL AND
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ("Agreement") is made and entered into _________ by and between CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, a California municipal corporation ("City") and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., a California Corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant may be referred to individually as "Party" or collectively as "Parties." In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSUL TANT

1.2 Consultant's Proposal and Citv's RFP. Consultant's proposal or bid for this Agreement ("Consultant's Proposal"), dated April 10, 2025 shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. City circulated a Request for Proposals for the services provided for herein on February 28, 2025. City's Request for Proposals ("City's RFP"), which was responded to by Consultant's Proposal, shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. The Scope of Services shall include the scope of services or work included both in Consultant's Proposal as well as in City's RFP. In the event of any inconsistency or any conflict between the terms of Consultant's Proposal (for scope of services or work, or schedule of performance), and the terms of City's RFP (for scope of services or work, or schedule of performance), the Consultant's Proposal shall govern, unless this Agreement provides otherwise. In the event of any inconsistency or any conflict between the terms of Consultant's Proposal, and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. No other terms and conditions from Consultant's Proposal, other than description of scope of services or work, as well as description of schedule of performance, shall apply to this Agreement, unless specifically agreed to by City in writing.

1.8 Prevailing Wages. If services include any "public work" or "maintenance work," as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code sections 1 720 et seq., 1 770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant's obligations in Section 5.3 (Indemnification) expressly apply to acts or omissions arising out of, or incidental to, the payment of prevailing wages by any person or entity (including Consultant, its subcontractors, and each of their officers, employees and agents) in connection with any services, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys' fees, and other related costs and expenses.

All duties of Consultant pursuant to this section shall survive termination of the Agreement.

1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit -2-
B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

Compensation may include reimbursement, for actual and necessary expenditures, if both specified in the Schedule of Compensation, as well as approved by City in advance. Upon expiration of original term of the Agreement, if term is extended (pursuant to Section 3.2 or otherwise), fees and rates may only be increased both pursuant to Section 9.4 as well as subsequent to negotiation between the Parties on a reasonable increase. The maximum of such increase shall be no greater than the CPI increase (Orange County area) for the applicable period of time. City has no obligation or duty to provide any such increase. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services, Consultant shall promptly notify the City Representative of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

2.2 Invoices. Unless some other method of payment is specified in Exhibit B, Special Requirements, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first business day of such month, Consultant shall submit to City, in a form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. Except as provided in Sections 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and City will use its best efforts to make payment no later than forty-five (45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. Each invoice is to include (unless otherwise specified by City): 1) line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate; 2) line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the services; 3) line items for all other approved reimbursable -3-
expenses claimed, with supporting documentation; and 4) line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the services.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services.

3.3 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.4 Force Maieure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, (with the express exception of delays arising from the impact of COVID-19 and its variants to the extent such impact is foreseeable or should have reasonably been foreseeable), if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify City in writing of the causes of the delay.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Consultant Representative. The Consultant Representative is Pat Somerville, Project Manager, 714-815-5222, [email protected], who is authorized to act on Consultant's behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 City Representative. The City Representative is such person as designated by the City Manager or her designee. The City Representative shall be the primary person on behalf of City responsible for the administration of the Agreement. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to -4-
assure that the City Representative is kept informed of both the progress of the performance of the services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

4.3 Approvals from City. City approvals or actions, pursuant to the authority of this Agreement, may be made (unless otherwise specified) either by the City Manager, the Public Works Director, or by the City Representative (or by their respective delegates as provided for in writing).

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages. Prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, and without limiting Consultant's indemnification obligation to City, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, for the duration of the Agreement, primary policies ofinsurance of the type and amounts below, issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business -5-
of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders' Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by City, which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, attorneys, successors and assigns of City. City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant's compensation. (a) Commercial General Liability Insurance. A policy of commercial general liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office ("ISO") form CG 00 01, written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. Coverage for an additional insured shall not be limited to its vicarious liability. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate.
(b) Worker's Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker's compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement.
(c) Automobile Liability. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance, at least as broad as ISO form CA 00 01, written on a per occurrence basis covering bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile.
(d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made" basis and must include coverage for contractual liability. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least five ( 5) consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and no less than $1,000,000 general aggregate. (e) Cvber Liability. Cyber liability insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession and the services hereunder, written on a per occurrence basis, with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss, and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations undertaken by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving: infringement of intellectual property; copyright; trademark; invasion of privacy violations; data breach; electronic information -6-
theft, loss, damage, destruction, alteration or misuse; release of private information; extortion; and, network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses, with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.
(f) Excess Liability and Umbrella Liability Insurance. Excess liability insurance and/or umbrella liability insurance may be used to satisfy the obligations herein. If excess liability insurance is used then the policy shall meet all the requirements herein and be at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth herein. Such policy shall: 1) include a drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason; 2) be payable-on-behalf-of as opposed to reimbursement; 3) have concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; 4) "follow form" to the underlying primary policies; and, 5) provide insureds, under primary policies required herein, shall be insureds under the excess liability policy. (g) Subcontractors. In the event Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, Consultant shall either: 1) include each subcontractor as insureds under its policies of insurance required herein; or, 2) Consultant shall, upon request of City, furnish to City all documentation, required in Article 5 for Consultant, for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements herein.

Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. In the event any insurance policy required under this Agreement is cancelled or amended (and the insurance policy is not replaced pursuant to subsection (b) below), or does not comply with Article 5, then: 1) City has the right but not the duty to obtain insurance required herein and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments; or, 2) City, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, may immediately terminate this Agreement. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required insurance policies. (b) Cancellation/Amendment. All of herein required policies of insurance shall provide the insurance may not be amended or cancelled by insurer or any Party hereto without providing thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice (with exception of ten (10) calendar days prior written notice for nonpayment of premium) to City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are amended or cancelled, Consultant shall, five (5) business days prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance, or reinstatement of policy, in conformance with this Agreement to City.
(c) Additional Insureds. The commercial general liability policy provided for -7-
in Section 5.l(a) and the automobile liability policy provided for in Section 5.l(c) both shall name City and its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and designated volunteers ("City Parties") as additional insureds and such coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City and City Parties. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability, and policies of insurance shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (d) Primary, Subrogation, Contribution and Coverage. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance. The insurers (with exception of professional liability insurer) for above policies, Consultant and any subcontractors are all deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution they may have against City or City Parties, and their respective insurers, and all insurance policies required herein shall be endorsed to waive such rights. Any insurance maintained by City or City Parties will apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum amounts provided herein, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City and City Parties.

None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with this Agreement if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained herein are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any Party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. (e) Limitations, Self- Insured Retention and Deductibles. Consultant agrees that requirements of Article 5 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from Consultant's activities or the activities of any person or persons for which Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit Consultant's indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. All insurance policies must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy any self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention (without impairment of obligation of primary insured under this Agreement to satisfy any selfinsured retention). Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City's option, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City and City Parties, or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, attorney's fees, defense expenses and claims.

5.3 Indemnification.
(a) General Obligations. Consultant agrees, to the full extent permitted by law, to immediately indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, attorneys, successors and assigns ( each an "Indemnitee" and collectively, "Indemnitees") against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all actions, either judicial, -8-
administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages or injuries to persons or property, demands, expenses, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities of any kind that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of, pertaining to, incident to or in connection with any alleged acts, errors or omissions of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (each an "lndemnitor" and collectively, "Indemnitors") in connection with the performance of Consultant's Services, or arising from Indemnitors' reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from lndemnitors' negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operations or activities provided herein, or any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, with such negligence or failure to perform to be determined by the City (herein "Claims or Liabilities"), and in connection therewith: 1) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed or threatened in connection with any such Claims or Liabilities, or at option oflndemnitees will reimburse and pay for all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith; and, 2) Consultant will promptly pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree rendered against Indemnitees, and reimburse lndemnitees for the cost of any settlement paid by Indemnitees, for any such Claims or Liabilities, and will save and hold Indemnitees harmless therefrom.
(b) Further Provisions. The indemnity obligation herein shall be binding on successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements as provided herein with its subcontractors, and if Consultant fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefor. Failure of City and/or City Parties ( collectively "City" for solely this Section 5.3(b)) to monitor compliance with any of the indemnification provisions herein shall not be a waiver hereof. The indemnification provisions herein do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City's negligence, except that design professionals' indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnification provided herein includes Claims or Liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services hereunder. Payment of invoices by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of the indemnity obligation herein. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Consultant will be obligated to pay for City's defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City as solely negligent or responsible for willful misconduct.

Consultant will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney's fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under Section 5 .3 of this Agreement. Such offset, if any, does not satisfy any amount, greater than the offset, due to City from Consultant. (c) Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's services, to the fullest extent permitted by law (within the limitations, as applicable, of Civil Code section 2782.8), Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Indemnitees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual -9-
or threatened, any and all Claims and Liabilities, consistent with all obligations provided for in this Section 5.3, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials ("documents and materials") prepared (regardless of whether complete or incomplete) by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of City and/or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership, use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents and materials under express condition that Consultant agrees such documents and materials are the sole property of City. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents and materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, with respect to any Consultant documents and materials that may qualify as "works made for hire" as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed "works made for hire" for City.

Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities -10-
other than City without prior written authorization from City. No news releases, including photographs, public announcements, or confirmations of the same, of any part of the work, shall be made without prior written authorization from City. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from City or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant immediately gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. As concerning, regarding or related to, in any way, this Agreement and the work performed thereunder: a) Consultant shall immediately notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party; b) City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding; and, c) Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant, however, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S.

District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, Southern Division, in the County of Orange, State of California.

7.2 Suspension, or Termination, Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 7.4 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate or suspend this Agreement, or any portion hereof, at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days' notice to Consultant, except that where termination or suspension is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as determined by City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination or suspension, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder, unless the notice provides otherwise, or except such as specifically approved by City. Upon submittal of an invoice consistent with Section 2.2, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination or suspension and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation, or such as may be approved -11-
by City, except as provided in Section 7.5. In event of termination, or suspension, without cause pursuant to this Section, there is no need to provide opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7 .3. 7 .3 Default of Consultant and Opportunitv to Cure. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively ten (10) days, but may be extended, or reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices, without liability for interest. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe, City may immediately both terminate this Agreement with notice to Consultant as well as pursue the remedy in Section 7.4, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant's obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver -12-
of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement of this Agreement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

7. 7 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

ARTICLE 8. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY, CONFLICTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this -13-
Agreement which affects their financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices. Any notice or other communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person in regards to this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in the case of City addressed to Public Works Director at City of Laguna Niguel, 30111 Crown Valley Parkway, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677, and in the case of Consultant, to the person( s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties as to the Agreement.

9.5 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby -14-
declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

ATTEST:

Marissa J. Asistin, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL,
CALIFORNIA:

Scott C. Smith, City Attorney
CITY:

CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, a California
municipal corporation
Tamara S. Letourneau, City Manager
CONSULTANT:

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
a California Corporation
By:--------------- Name:

Title:

By: _____________ _
Name:

Title:

Address:
------------
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairperson of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.)

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULT ANT'S BUSINESS ENTITY.
-16-

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

II. Consultant will perform services, provide the deliverables and reports and utilize the key personnel, described in Consultant's Proposal and City's RFP (refer to Section

1.2 for conflicts).

A(l)

EXHIBITB

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Agreement Template)

NOT APPLICABLE
B(l)

EXHIBITC

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. City will compensate Consultant for the services performed upon submission of a valid invoice, as described in Section 2.2.

II. The total compensation for the services shall not exceed the total of the Contract Sum, as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

III. Consultant will be compensated for services provided pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with description in Consultant's Proposal.

C(l)

EXHIBITD

D(1)

Laguna Niguel City CouncilJuly 15, 2025

Laguna Niguel City Council
July 15, 2025