Agenda packet — Lake Elsinore City Council, April 25, 2023 (part 2 of 5)

REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency From: Jason Simpson, Executive Director
Prepared by: Candice Alvarez, MMC, Secretary
Date: April 25, 2023
Subject: Minutes of the Regular Successor Agency Meeting of April 11, 2023 Recommendation
Approve the Minutes.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Minutes
City of Lake Elsinore
City Council Meeting Minutes – Draft
Natasha Johnson, Mayor
Steve Manos, Mayor Pro Tem
Brian Tisdale, Council Member
Timothy J. Sheridan, Council Member
Robert E. Magee, Council Member
Jason Simpson, City Manager
Meeting Date:

April 11, 2023
Closed Session: 5:30 PM
Public Session: 7:00 PM
Cultural Center
183 N. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530

CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Present: 4 - Council Members Tisdale, Sheridan, and Magee; and Mayor Johnson

Absent: 1 - Mayor Pro Tem Manos

PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
There were no speakers.

CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference With Real Property Negotiator
(Gov’t Code Section 54956.8)
Property: APN 377-180-037
Agency negotiator: City Manager Simpson
Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and Southern California Investors Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
B. Conference With Real Property Negotiator
(Gov’t Code Section 54956.8)
Property: APN 378-282-016, -017
Agency negotiator: City Manager Simpson
Negotiating parties: City of Lake Elsinore and The Saul Brandman Foundation Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
C. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation
Pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9.

In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, U.S.D.C. Case No. 1:17-CV-2804 City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 :

RECESS
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 5:31 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem Manos arrived at 5:35 p.m.

RECONVENE/CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council reconvened and the regular meeting of the successor agency was called to order at 7:00 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council Member Magee led the Pledge of Allegiance.

MOMENT OF SILENCE

ROLL CALL

Present: 5 - Council Members Tisdale, Sheridan, and Magee; Mayor Pro Tem Manos; and Mayor Johnson

Absent: 0 - None

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Leibold reported that all items were discussed; however, no reportable action was taken.

PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIALS
1) Riverside County Sheriff's Office 2023 First Quarter Statistical Update Lieutenant Clark presented the update.
2) Jordan Ramirez Walk in Honor of Deputy Darnell Calhoun Present a Certificate of Recognition to Jordan Ramirez for his walk in honor of Deputy Darnell Calhoun.

Mayor Johnson presented a Certificate of Recognition to Jordan Ramirez. 3) Railroad Canyon Road Safety Assessment
Traffic Engineer Brophy provided a presentation.

City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 :

PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - ONE MINUTE
Ace Vallejos was called to speak.

Kimberly Ryan was called to speak.

Paulie Tehrani was called to speak.

CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Council Member Tisdale, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Manos to approve the City Council Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 Council Members Tisdale, Sheridan, and Magee; Mayor Pro Tem Manos; and Mayor Johnson
Nay: 0 None
4) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of March 28, 2023 Approve the Minutes.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 5) CC Warrant Report Dated March 10, 2023, to March 16, 2023 Receive and File.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 6) CC Warrant Report Dated March 17, 2023, to March 23, 2023 Receive and File.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 7) Second Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes Within Community Facilities District No. 2023-1 of the City of Lake Elsinore (Lakeside) Adopt by title only and waive further reading of AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-1 OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (LAKESIDE).

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar.

City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 :
8) Second Reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapters to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Relating to Trespassing on Designated Conservation Areas and City Property
Adopt by title only and waive further reading of AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER

9.56 (TRESPASS ON DESIGNATED CONSERVATION AREAS) AND CHAPTER

9.58 (TRESPASS ON CITY PROPERTY) TO TITLE 9 (PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS

AND WELFARE) OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

TRESPASS ON DESIGNATED CONSERVATION AREAS AND TRESPASS ON CITY PROPERTY.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 9) Letter of Support for AB 1708 (Muratsuchi) Theft
Direct Staff to submit a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1708 (Muratsuchi) from the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 10) Purchase of Real Property for Drainage Purposes (APN 375-351-036) Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ACQUISITION OF ONE RIVERSIDE

COUNTY TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY FOR THE APPROXIMATE PURCHASE PRICE OF $6,390.50 PLUS ASSOCIATED ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 375-351-036 AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT TO

PURCHASE TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 11) Agreement with The Pun Group, LLP for Auditing Services for the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2023, 2024, and 2025.

Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with an initial annual amount of $56,500, increasing by three percent (3%) annually, with The Pun Group, LLP., to perform professional auditing services in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 12) Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Sagecrest Planning & Environmental
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with Sagecrest Planning & Environmental, LLC for additional services to prepare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance documents for a total contract amount not to exceed $72,900, in final form as approved by the City Attorney.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar.

City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 :
13) Ruth Atkins Celebration Road Closure
Approve the Road Closure for the Celebration of Life for Ruth Atkins on Saturday, April 15, 2023.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 14) Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement With Sommer Engineering for I-15 / Main Street Interchange Improvements
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with Sommer Engineering for $281,926.75 plus an additional 10% contingency of $28,192.68, for I-15 / Main Street Interchange Improvements – Construction Support Services in final form as approved by the City Attorney.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 15) Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates for Preparation of a Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Study
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates (Webb) for $155,730 to prepare a Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) study for the City, plus an additional 10% contingency for unforeseen expenditures, in final form as approved by the City Attorney.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 16) Professional Services Agreement with Wilson Mikami Corporation, Inc. for the City Engineering Standards and Design Manual Updates
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Wilson Mikami Corporation, Inc. for City Engineering Standards and Design Manual updates in an amount of $92,800 plus a 10% contingency and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar. 17) Final Tract Map 36567, South Shore II

1. Approve Final Tract Map 36567 subject to the City Engineer’s acceptance as being true and correct;

2. Authorize the City Clerk to sign the map and arrange for the recordation of Final Tract Map 36567; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the lien agreement, in such final form approved by the City Attorney, for improvements and monumentation.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar.

City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 :
18) Purchase of New Quint Fire Truck for Fire Station #97 Approve the purchase of a new Quint 75’ Aerial Ladder fire apparatus with a Waterous Fire Pump per attached specifications for $1,600,000 from the County of Riverside plus 20% contingency for a total of $1,920,000.

This item was approved on the City Council Consent Calendar.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Agency Member Tisdale, seconded by Vice Chair Manos to approve the Successor Agency Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 Agency Members Tisdale, Sheridan, and Magee; Vice Chair Manos; and Chair Johnson
Nay: 0 None
19) Minutes of the Regular Successor Agency Meeting of March 28, 2023 Approve the Minutes.

This item was approved on the Successor Agency Consent Calendar. 20) SA Warrant Report Dated March 10, 2023, to March 16, 2023 Receive and File.

This item was approved on the Successor Agency Consent Calendar. 21) SA Warrant Report Dated March 17, 2023, to March 23, 2023 Receive and File.

This item was approved on the Successor Agency Consent Calendar.

PUBLIC HEARING
22) Updated Master Drainage Plan and Fee Schedule
Receive testimony, if any, and continue the item to April 25, 2023.

A motion was made by Council Member Tisdale, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Manos to approve the City Council Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 Council Members Tisdale, Sheridan, and Magee; Mayor Pro Tem Manos; and Mayor Johnson
Nay: 0 None

PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - THREE MINUTES
Jeanie Corral was called to speak.

City Council Minutes - Draft April 11, 2023
City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 :

CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS
City Manager Simpson had no comments.

CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
City Attorney Leibold had no comments.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS/REPORTS ON MEETINGS ATTENDED
Council Member Tisdale announced a Veterans Resource Fair which will be held on April 26, 2023 from 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. at the Moreno Valley Conference & Recreation Center; and reported on his attendance at the Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee meeting which was held on April 3, 2023.

Council Member Sheridan recognized Mayor Johnson for the presentation she gave at the Historical Society on Tuesday, April 4, 2023; reported on his attendance at the Riverside Transit Agency Budget and Finance Committee meeting on April 5, 2023; and shared a video honoring 2022 California League Champions Storm baseball team.

Council Member Magee encouraged residents to take animals to the Animal Friends of the Valleys if they are unable to take care of them; shared that the Riverside County Transportation Committee voted to support SB 617 regarding progressive design build; announced SCCA Autocross Weekend on Saturday, April 15-16, 2023 at Diamond Stadium; invited the community to comment on the Good Neighbor Policy pending consideration; invited the community to attend a memorial in honor of Ruth Atkins on Saturday, April 15, 2023 from 3:00 – 5:00 p.m. at Lake Elsinore Museum; announced the 10th Annual Lake Elsinore Dream Extreme Fishing Derby on May 19-21, 2023 from 6:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. at Launch Pointe; and honored former City Council Member William S. Buck who passed away on April 4, 2023.

Vice Chair Manos reported on his attendance at the Southern California Association of Governments Transportation Committee and Regional Council meetings on April 6, 2023; congratulated Matthew Dobler for his appointment as the Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce Business Development Manager; and honored members of his family who recently passed away.

Mayor Johnson recognized seven Students of the Month; reported on her attendance at the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority meeting held on April 3, 2023; provided updates from the Homeless Task Force; provided updates on the algae in and levels of the Lake; encouraged residents to utilize the Alert LE app; provided legislative updates on SB44, SB602, SCR25, and AB1708; and adjourned the meeting in memory of former Council Member William S. Buck.

ADJOURNMENT
The Lake Elsinore City Council adjourned at 8:06 p.m. to the next Regular meeting of Tuesday, April 25, 2023 in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street. Closed Session will commence at 5:00 p.m. or such later time as noticed on the Agenda, and the regular Open Session business meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m.

_________________________
Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk

Page 1 of 1 ends

Discussion
The Warrant Report lists all general checks issued for the Successors Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore for the abovementioned period.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - SA Warrant Summary
Attachment 2 - SA Warrant Listing
MAR 24, 2023 TO MAR 30, 2023 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SA WARRANT SUMMARY FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL
540 SARDA DIAMOND STADIUM 174,406.26
GRAND TOTAL $ 174,406.26
Attachment 1 1 of 1
MAR 24, 2023 TO MAR 30, 2023 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SA WARRANT LIST WARRANT NO. VENDOR NAME AMOUNT
APA23003669 UNIQUE BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA $ 164,965.60
APA23003635 LAKE ELSINORE STORM, LP $ 7,712.75
APA23003595 CED LAGUNA $ 1,708.73
APA23003655 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. $ 19.18
GRAND TOTAL $ 174,406.26
Attachment 2 1 OF 1

Page 1 of 1 ends

Discussion
The Warrant Report lists all general checks issued for the Successors Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore for the abovementioned period.

Attachments
Attachment 1- SA Warrant Summary
Attachment 2 - SA Warrant Listing
MAR 31, 2023 TO APR 06, 2023 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SA WARRANT SUMMARY FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL
540 SARDA DIAMOND STADIUM 35,373.10
GRAND TOTAL $ 35,373.10
Attachment 1 1 of 1
MAR 31, 2023 TO APR 06, 2023 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SA WARRANT LIST WARRANT NO. VENDOR NAME AMOUNT
APA23003737 STK ARCHITECTURE $ 2,141.80
5429 AK SECURITY ALARM $ 6,118.62
APA23003683 AZTECA CLEANING SERVICES $ 6,923.08
APA23003680 AMBER AIR CONDITIONING $ 20,189.60
GRAND TOTAL $ 35,373.10
Attachment 2 1 OF 1

Page 1 of 1 ends

REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF

THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
To: Honorable Agency Chair and Members of the Successor Agency From: Jason Simpson, Executive Director
Prepared by: Shannon Buckley, Assistant Executive Director Date: April 25, 2023
Subject: SA Investment Report for March 2023
Recommendation
Receive and file the Investment Report for March 2023.

Discussion
The Investment Report lists all funds invested for the City of Lake Elsinore. It includes funds held for the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore as of the date shown on the report.

Fiscal Impact
No fiscal impact
Attachments
Attachment 1- Investment Report for March 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

INVESTMENT REPORT

BANK DEPOSITS OUTSTANDING BOOK

CASH ACCOUNTS BALANCE IN TRANSIT CHECKS BALANCE
Bank Accounts:

General Checking Account 873,965 $ 57,752 $ (169,246) $ 762,471 $ Cash On Hand:

Cashier Drawers #1 & #2 - - - 300
City of Lake Elsinore Petty Cash Fund - - - 2,000
Total Cash Accounts 873,965 57,752 (169,246) 764,771

INVESTMENTS
Local Agency Investment Funds 67,511,627 - - 67,511,627 CAMP Investments:

CAMP Pool Account - 15,909 - 15,909
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 28,410,332 - - 28,410,332
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note - 1,377,948 - 1,377,948 Municipal Bond / Note 1,536,023 - - 1,536,023
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security - 262,383 - 262,383 Federal Agency Bond / Note 5,011,578 - - 5,011,578
Corporate Note 11,424,535 - - 11,424,535
Certificate of Deposit 900,000 - - 900,000
Asset-Backed Security 2,692,368 - - 2,692,368
Sub-total Investments 119,142,702 - - 119,142,702
Market Value Adjustment:

Unrealized Gain/(Loss) at 12/31/2022 (3,182,321) - - (3,182,321) Total Investments 115,960,381 - - 115,960,381
Total Pooled Cash and Investments 116,834,346 $ 57,752 $ (169,246) $ 116,725,152 $ TOTAL POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 116,725,152
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on June 28, 2022. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures.

Jason P. Simpson April 14, 2023
City Manager Date

C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E

INVESTMENT REPORT OF POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
AS OF March 31, 2023

FUND NO FUND NAME AMOUNT
100 General 20,308,467 $
102 Measure Z 17,308,741
106 Affordable Housing In Lieu 619,900
107 Developer Agreement Revenue 59,485
108 American Rescue Plan 9,665,915
109 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (SB1) 433,188
110 State Gas Tax 1,011,445
112 Measure A 1,665,512
114 SB1186 CASP Education Program 52,448
117 Community Center DIF 139,309
118 Lake Side Facility DIF 240,112
119 Animal Shelter DIF 15,551
135 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance - Dist. No. 1 869,824 140 Geothermal 11,580
160 PEG Grant 76,333
180 Launch Pointe 1,009,391
202 La Strada RBBD 23,618
203 E.L.S.P. - S.T.I.F. 3,330,507
205 Traffic Impact Fee 302,815
211 Storm Drain C.I.P. 3,048,146
221 Quimby Park C.I.P. 51,811
231 Library C.I.P. 1,304,054
232 City Fire Protection 541,072
300 Insurance Service 1,492,496
305 Information Systems Service 2,428,886
310 Support Service 17,768
315 Fleet Service 391,568
320 Facilities Service 2,320,310
331 CFD 2006-1CC Summerly Improvement Area CC 40,444
332 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area B, Summerly 26,980
333 CFD 2015-3 Terracina 1,352
334 CFD 2015-5 Trieste - Far West Industries 39,397
335 CFD 2003-2E Canyon Hills Improvement Area E 11,662
336 CFD 2006-1FF Summerly Improvement Area FF 33,530
337 CFD 2016-2 Canyon Hills 156,011
338 CFD 2006-1 IA-JJ Summerly Improvement Area 50,761
339 CFD 2006-1 IA-KK Summerly Improvement Area 21,484
340 CFD 2006-1 IA-EE Summerly Improvement Area 48,399
345 CFD 2003-2 Improvement Area D, Canyon Hills 522,843 346 CFD 2014-1 Southshore 67,313
347 CFD 2006-1 Improvement Area A, Summerly 56,175
350 CFD 98-1 Summerhill 335,343
354 CFD 90-2 Tuscany Hills 606,075
355 RAD 2021-1 Canyon Hills Improvement 268,277
357 CFD 2003-2 Canyon Hills Improvement Area 16,973

C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E

POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND
AS OF March 31, 2023

FUND NO FUND NAME AMOUNT

C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E

POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY FUND
AS OF March 31, 2023
361 CFD 2022-2 Lakeshore Improvement 13,368
362 CFD 2006-8S Running Deer Estates Services 10,144
363 CFD 2022-3 Lakeside 20,166
366 CFD 2005-6 City Center Townhomes 84,727
368 CFD 2006-2 Viscaya 135,214
369 CFD 2004-3 Area 1 Rosetta Canyon Improvement Area 406,916 370 CFD 2006-1 IA-HH Summerly Improvement 33,605
371 CFD 2005-1 Serenity 155,586
372 CFD 2005-2 Alberhill Ranch Improvement Area 407,409 374 CFD 2005-4 Lakeview Villas 1,619
375 CFD 2006-4 Clurman 120,438
377 CFD 2006-6 Tessara 18,835
378 CFD 2006-8 Running Deer Estates 28,939
384 CFD 2003-2 Area B Canyon Hills Improvement Area 568,625 385 CFD 2004-3 Area 2 Rosetta Canyon Improvement Area 480,519 386 CFD 2007-4 Mekenna Court 36,924
387 CFD 2007-5 Red Kite 26,116
388 CFD 2007-6 Holiday Inn Express 2,223
389 CFD 88-3 (2008A) West Lake Elsinore Series A 11,423 390 CFD 2003-2 Area C Canyon Hills Improvement Area 80,180 392 CFD 95-1 City Center 19,637
394 CFD 2005-5 (2012A) Wasson Canyon 99,525
395 CFD 2018-1 Wasson Canyon II Improvement Area 4,492
500 Capital Improvement Plan 5,266,193
540 Successor To RDA Diamond Stadium 1,599,313
603 Endowment Trust - Carl Graves 57,897
604 Endowment Trust - Korn Memorial 33,276
605 Public Improvement Trust 1,655,484
606 Mobile Source Air Polution Reduction 253,857
608 Trust Deposit & Pre Paid Expense 1,516,573
617 Successor Agency Housing 25,126,901
620 Cost Recovery System 6,889,059
631 Lake Destratification Equipment Replacement 504,049 655 CFD 2015-1s Law, Fire, Paramedic Services 12,652
Total Pooled Cash & Investments $ 116,725,152

MAXIMUM DIVERSIFICATION CURRENT

TYPES OF SECURITIES PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE BALANCE
CAMP - Pooled Sweep Account Unlimited 0.01% 15,909 $
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note Unlimited 23.85% 28,410,332 $ Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 30% 1.16% 1,377,948 $ Municipal Bond / Note Unlimited 1.29% 1,536,023 $
Federal Agency Collaterized Mortgage Obligation 40% 0.22% 262,383 $ Federal Agency Bond / Note Unlimited 4.21% (1) $ 5,011,578 Corporate Note 30% 9.59% 11,424,535 $
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% 0.76% 900,000 $
Asset-Backed Security / Collaterized Mortgage 20% 2.26% 2,692,368 $ LAIF (Local Agency Investment Funds) $150 Million 56.66% (2) $ 67,511,627 TOTAL 100.00% 119,142 $ ,702
Note:
(1) No more than 40% in any one federal agency. See CAMP Portfolio Statement for listing of agencies. (2) Investment in LAIF may not exceed $75 million in each agency.

C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E

SUMMARY OF POLICY LIMITATIONS
FOR THE MONTH ENDING March 31, 2023
Local Agency Investment Fund
March 2.831
February 2.624
January 2.425

0.00005680946709337

0.981389258
LAIF Earnings Ratio(2):

LAIF Fair Value Factor(1):

PMIA Daily(1): 2.29
LAIF Apportionment Rate 2.07 (2):

PMIA Quarter to Date(1): 1.98
PMIA Average Life 287 (1):

Treasuries

64.81%
Agencies

21.68%
Certificates of
Deposit/Bank Notes

6.21%
Time
Deposits

2.62%
Commercial
Paper

4.25%
Corporate
Bonds

0.24%
Loans

0.19%
Notes: The apportionment rate includes interest earned on the CalPERS Supplemental Pension Payment pursuant to Government Code 20825 (c)(1) and interest earned on the Wildfire Fund loan pursuant to Public Utility Code 3288 (a).

Source:
(1) State of California, Office of the Treasurer
(2) State of Calfiornia, Office of the Controller
PMIA Average Monthly
Effective Yields(1)
PMIA/LAIF Performance Report
as of 04/05/23
Daily rates are now available here. View PMIA Daily Rates Quarterly Performance
Quarter Ended 12/31/22
Chart does not include $3,158,000.00 in mortgages, which equates to 0.002%. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Pooled Money Investment Account
Monthly Portfolio Composition (1)
02/28/23
$200.5 billion
Yield Purchase Date Maturity Rate

2.831% Daily 24-Hour
Investment Beginning Balance Net Increase/(Decrease) Ending Balance Total Investments Held with
Local Agency Investment Fund: $ (3,000,000) 70,511,627 $ 67,511,627 $ Note:

Per California State Treasurer, LAIF Statute 16429.1: Separate accounts for each governmental unit shall be maintained.

C I T Y O F L A K E E L S I N O R E

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND

TRANSACTION SUMMARY
FOR THE MONTH ENDING March 31, 2023
CAMP
Investment Portfolio
Account Statement - Transaction Summary For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Opening Market Value
Purchases
Redemptions
Change in Value
Closing Market Value
622,218.03
1,559,937.13
(2,166,246.01)

0.00 $15,909.15
CAMP Pool
Unsettled Trades 0.00
Cash Dividends and Income 524.72
Opening Market Value
Purchases
Redemptions
Change in Value
Closing Market Value
48,902,312.71
2,156,723.94
(1,511,111.40)
815,550.66
$50,363,475.91
CAMP Managed Account
Unsettled Trades 0.00
Cash Dividends and Income 43,482.58
March 31, 2023 February 28, 2023
Asset Summary
CAMP Pool 15,909.15 622,218.03
CAMP Managed Account 50,363,475.91 48,902,312.71
Total $50,379,385.06 $49,524,530.74
Asset Allocation

0.03%
CAMP Pool

99.97%
CAMP Managed
Account

Page 1 ends

Managed Account Summary Statement For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dividend
Closing Market Value
Redemptions
Purchases
Opening Market Value
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Closing Market Value
Opening Market Value
Account Total
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Dividends
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
Reconciling Transactions
Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary- Managed Account
$622,218.03
1,559,937.13
(2,166,246.01)
$15,909.15
524.72
$48,902,312.71
(293,719.26)
(1,217,392.14)
2,156,723.94

0.00 815,550.66
$50,363,475.91
$49,524,530.74
$50,379,385.06
47,495.98
(5,819.43)
1,806.03
$43,482.58
251,495.49
1,221,056.23
42,336.40
43,719.26
(2,162,543.37)
603,935.99

0.00 Managed Account Total
51,690,828.28 51,706,737.43
236,084.47
1,221,056.23
295,214.75
42,336.40
(2,162,543.37)
(51,002,349.06)
(203,046.60)

0.00 236,084.47
3,387,302.24
295,214.75
42,336.40
(3,722,480.50)
(51,624,567.09)
(203,046.60)
524.72
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $117,581.10 $118,105.82
Transaction Summary - Money Market Transaction Summary - Managed Account _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Cash Balance
Closing Cash Balance $0.00

Page 2 ends

Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Account Summary
Description Par Value Market Value Percent
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 29,950,000.00 28,122,808.34 55.83 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 1,380,000.00 1,330,455.57 2.64 Municipal Bond / Note 1,535,000.00 1,449,049.80 2.88
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
250,000.00 243,603.55 0.48
Federal Agency Bond / Note 5,025,000.00 4,733,010.18 9.39 Corporate Note 11,420,000.00 10,940,837.65 21.72
Certificate of Deposit 900,000.00 902,878.65 1.79
Asset-Backed Security 2,692,674.37 2,640,832.17 5.24
Managed Account Sub-Total 53,152,674.37 50,363,475.91 99.97% Accrued Interest 236,084.47
Total Portfolio 53,152,674.37 50,599,560.38
CAMP Pool 15,909.15 15,909.15 0.03
Total Investments 53,168,583.52 50,615,469.53 100.00%
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation

5.24% ABS

1.79%
Cert of Deposit

21.72%
Corporate Note

9.39%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note

0.48%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security

0.03%
Joint Powers
Authority

2.88%
Muni Bond / Note

2.64%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note 55.83%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years

1.98%

16.51%

8.78%

22.35%

38.62%

11.76%

0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 992

2.86%

4.19%

Page 3 ends

Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)

4.04%
A

2.22%
A+

5.87%
A3.71%
AA

67.42%
AA+

3.66%
AA8.83%
AAA

0.03%
AAAm

2.68%
BBB+

1.54%
NR
Issuer Summary
Issuer of Holdings Percent
Market Value
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 222,825.15 0.44
AMAZON.COM INC 440,467.03 0.87
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 353,265.42 0.70
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 388,121.20 0.77
APPLE INC 739,968.45 1.47
BANK OF AMERICA CO 430,807.95 0.86
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 448,794.25 0.89
BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA LLC 223,161.16 0.44
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 367,566.75 0.73
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 77,776.70 0.15
CAMP Pool 15,909.15 0.03
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 247,525.53 0.49
CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST 291,596.64 0.58
CATERPILLAR INC 205,272.23 0.41
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 96,740.00 0.19 CHARLES SCHWAB 376,492.61 0.75
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 63,522.68 0.13
CITIGROUP INC 217,125.90 0.43
DEERE & COMPANY 94,694.50 0.19
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES 183,240.37 0.36
FANNIE MAE 1,556,053.15 3.09
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 462,565.20 0.92
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMIN FIN CORP 288,796.00 0.57
FORD CREDIT AUTO OWNER TRUST 130,238.44 0.26
FREDDIE MAC 2,957,995.38 5.87
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 220,095.45 0.44
GM FINANCIAL CONSUMER AUTOMOBILE TRUST 356,261.82 0.71
GM FINANCIAL LEASINGTRUST 118,429.64 0.24
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 393,069.60 0.78
HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE TRUST 171,302.59 0.34
HOME DEPOT INC 24,187.50 0.05
HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 95,414.99 0.19

Page 4 ends

Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Issuer of Holdings Percent
Market Value
HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES 131,798.31 0.26
IBM CORP 222,448.73 0.44
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 600,476.32 1.19
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 729,979.25 1.45
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 465,272.68 0.92
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 128,746.80 0.26
MICROSOFT CORP 735,940.50 1.46
MORGAN STANLEY 395,051.60 0.78
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD 732,226.00 1.45
NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES CO FINANCE CORP 380,961.35 0.76 NEW YORK ST URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORP 302,646.50 0.60
NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES 401,768.57 0.80
NORDEA BANK ABP 453,139.65 0.90
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 166,429.73 0.33
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP 392,482.80 0.78
Roche Holding AG 391,755.41 0.78
SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 119,988.70 0.24
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 205,352.00 0.41
STATE OF CONNECTICUT 58,020.60 0.12
STATE OF MINNESOTA 91,890.00 0.18
TARGET CORP 36,981.84 0.07
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 625,894.30 1.24 THE WALT DISNEY CORPORATION 384,575.60 0.76
TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 449,739.00 0.89
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 892,296.27 1.77
UNITED STATES TREASURY 28,122,808.34 55.82
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 204,341.18 0.41
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 79,092.50 0.16
USAA CAPITAL CORP 217,997.10 0.43
Total $50,379,385.06 100.00%

Page 5 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/31/2022 0.875% 01/31/2024
91282CDV0 6,275,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/13/23 01/17/23 6,035,765.62 4.68 9,100.48 6,082,476.29 6,075,964.53

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2024
912828YY0 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/05/20 08/07/20 534,414.06 0.18 2,199.59 513,705.66 479,609.40

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.250% 06/30/2025
912828ZW3 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/01/21 04/05/21 245,156.25 0.72 157.11 247,429.40 230,390.62

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.250% 06/30/2025
912828ZW3 450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/01/21 03/04/21 443,654.30 0.58 282.81 446,700.56 414,703.13

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 150,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/01/21 07/07/21 147,052.73 0.82 141.40 148,191.69 136,687.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/02/21 06/07/21 344,859.38 0.70 329.94 346,902.68 318,937.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/21 12/06/21 387,968.75 1.13 377.07 391,863.12 364,500.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/03/21 08/05/21 446,167.97 0.57 424.21 447,606.47 410,062.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 650,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/02/21 11/04/21 632,251.95 1.05 612.74 638,249.81 592,312.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 825,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/01/21 09/07/21 814,236.33 0.68 777.71 818,136.11 751,781.25

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
91282CBW0 75,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/10/22 02/14/22 71,458.01 1.92 236.19 72,405.77 68,367.19

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026
91282CBW0 950,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/22 01/06/22 926,843.75 1.33 2,991.71 933,459.82 865,984.37

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/01/22 09/06/22 179,007.81 3.53 207.18 182,059.34 180,375.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/03/22 05/05/22 226,250.00 3.03 258.98 231,328.33 225,468.75

Page 6 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 750,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/01/22 08/04/22 690,468.75 2.74 776.93 700,274.86 676,406.25

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 800,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/08/22 732,343.75 2.84 828.73 744,516.40 721,500.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 900,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/02/22 06/06/22 819,035.16 2.94 932.32 835,003.82 811,687.50

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026
91282CCP4 900,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/08/22 08/15/22 819,562.50 3.04 932.32 832,301.22 811,687.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/22 11/04/22 228,144.53 4.39 1,892.27 230,341.95 235,078.12

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 975,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/23 01/06/23 907,092.77 3.96 7,379.83 911,189.37 916,804.69

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 2,100,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/05/22 12/07/22 1,954,066.41 3.92 15,895.03 1,965,728.93 1,974,656.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 9,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/13/23 01/17/23 8,922,578.13 3.72 71,906.07 8,953,142.66 8,932,968.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2022 2.750% 04/30/2027
91282CEN7 1,200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/31/23 02/03/23 1,155,421.88 3.70 13,856.35 1,157,064.38 1,156,500.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
91282CFB2 800,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/02/23 03/06/23 746,531.25 4.44 3,646.41 747,395.79 770,375.04 Security Type Sub-Total 29,950,000.00 28,410,332.04 3.40 136,143.38 28,577,474.43 28,122,808.34 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note

INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
459058JV6 245,000.00 AAA Aaa 04/13/21 04/20/21 244,492.85 0.23 136.96 244,986.80 244,412.25

INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
459058JM6 500,000.00 AAA Aaa 11/17/20 11/24/20 498,925.00 0.32 440.97 499,767.33 485,567.00

INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 635,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/15/21 09/23/21 634,530.10 0.52 70.56 634,768.05 600,476.32

Page 7 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
Security Type Sub-Total 1,380,000.00 1,377,947.95 0.40 648.49 1,379,522.18 1,330,455.57 Municipal Bond / Note

CT ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 06/11/2020 1.998% 07/01/2024
20772KJW0 60,000.00 AA- Aa3 05/29/20 06/11/20 60,000.00 2.00 299.70 60,000.00 58,020.60

CHAFFEY UHSD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 12/05/2019 2.101% 08/01/2024
157411TK5 100,000.00 AA- Aa1 11/06/19 12/05/19 100,000.00 2.10 350.17 100,000.00 96,740.00

NY ST URBAN DEV CORP TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 12/23/2020 0.870% 03/15/2025
650036DT0 325,000.00 NR NR 12/16/20 12/23/20 325,000.00 0.87 125.67 325,000.00 302,646.50

UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025
91412HGE7 85,000.00 AA Aa2 07/10/20 07/16/20 85,000.00 0.88 283.54 85,000.00 79,092.50

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 65,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 65,459.55 1.11 204.42 65,215.98 60,554.00

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 85,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 85,563.55 1.12 267.32 85,264.86 79,186.00

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 160,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 160,000.00 1.26 503.20 160,000.00 149,056.00

MN ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 08/25/2020 0.630% 08/01/2025
60412AVJ9 100,000.00 AAA Aaa 08/11/20 08/25/20 100,000.00 0.63 105.00 100,000.00 91,890.00

SAN JUAN USD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 10/29/2020 0.852% 08/01/2025
798306WP7 130,000.00 NR Aa2 10/16/20 10/29/20 130,000.00 0.85 184.60 130,000.00 119,988.70

LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025
54438CYK2 140,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/10/20 140,000.00 0.77 180.37 140,000.00 128,746.80

CA ST UNIV TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 07/29/2021 0.862% 11/01/2025
13077DQD7 85,000.00 AA- Aa2 07/09/21 07/29/21 85,000.00 0.86 305.29 85,000.00 77,776.70

CA ST MUNICIPAL BONDS
DTD 03/15/2023 4.846% 03/01/2027
13063D3N6 200,000.00 AA- Aa2 03/09/23 03/15/23 200,000.00 4.85 430.76 200,000.00 205,352.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1,535,000.00 1,536,023.10 1.60 3,240.04 1,535,480.84 1,449,049.80

Page 8 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K043 A2
DTD 03/01/2015 3.062% 12/01/2024
3137BGK24 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/19/20 03/25/20 262,382.81 1.95 637.92 254,412.10 243,603.55 Security Type Sub-Total 250,000.00 262,382.81 1.95 637.92 254,412.10 243,603.55 Federal Agency Bond / Note

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
3137EAEW5 225,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/02/20 09/04/20 225,041.09 0.24 35.94 225,005.98 220,536.23

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
3137EAEW5 525,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/02/20 09/04/20 524,826.75 0.26 83.85 524,974.78 514,584.52

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 10/16/2020 0.125% 10/16/2023
3137EAEY1 325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/14/20 10/16/20 323,787.75 0.25 186.20 324,780.80 316,844.13

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
3137EAEZ8 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/03/20 11/05/20 349,685.00 0.28 352.43 349,937.06 340,590.60

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
3135G06H1 325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/23/20 11/25/20 324,629.50 0.29 279.86 324,918.94 315,434.60

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023
3137EAFA2 300,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/20 12/04/20 299,703.00 0.28 243.75 299,933.01 290,929.50

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025
3130AJHU6 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/15/20 04/16/20 348,264.00 0.60 811.81 349,291.89 325,178.70

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/22/20 04/24/20 349,279.00 0.67 966.15 349,702.75 325,835.30

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025
3137EAEU9 425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/23/20 422,883.50 0.48 309.90 424,022.98 390,681.25

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/25/20 08/27/20 348,362.00 0.47 131.25 349,212.43 320,782.70

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 09/11/2020 0.375% 09/04/2025
3130AK5E2 150,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/10/20 09/11/20 149,550.00 0.44 42.19 149,780.57 137,386.50

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 700,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/23/20 09/25/20 697,893.00 0.44 58.33 698,953.43 640,225.60

Page 9 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 650,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/09/20 11/12/20 647,673.00 0.57 1,300.00 648,784.75 594,000.55 Security Type Sub-Total 5,025,000.00 5,011,577.59 0.42 4,801.66 5,019,299.37 4,733,010.18 Corporate Note

PNC BANK NA CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/23/2019 3.500% 01/23/2024
693475AV7 400,000.00 A- A3 02/12/19 02/15/19 402,848.00 3.34 2,644.44 400,427.52 392,482.80

CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
808513BN4 105,000.00 A A2 03/16/21 03/18/21 104,947.50 0.77 28.44 104,983.14 99,888.71

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 04/26/2021 0.500% 04/26/2024
06406RAS6 210,000.00 A A1 04/19/21 04/26/21 209,775.30 0.54 452.08 209,919.84 199,771.32

MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES
DTD 04/28/2014 3.875% 04/29/2024
61746BDQ6 400,000.00 A- A1 07/19/19 07/23/19 422,916.00 2.59 6,544.44 405,183.07 395,051.60

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP NOTE
DTD 06/27/2019 2.400% 06/27/2024
02665WCZ2 400,000.00 A- A3 07/11/19 07/15/19 398,016.00 2.51 2,506.67 399,503.18 388,121.20

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
BONDS
DTD 07/08/2014 3.850% 07/08/2024
38141EC23 400,000.00 BBB+ A2 07/08/19 07/11/19 418,632.00 2.84 3,550.56 404,010.23 393,069.60

BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024
05565EBU8 70,000.00 A A2 08/09/21 08/12/21 69,993.70 0.75 71.46 69,997.13 66,240.58

WALT DISNEY COMPANY/THE (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/06/2019 1.750% 08/30/2024
254687FK7 400,000.00 BBB+ A2 09/03/19 09/06/19 398,368.00 1.84 602.78 399,536.40 384,575.60

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 09/10/2021 0.625% 09/10/2024
24422EVU0 100,000.00 A A2 09/07/21 09/10/21 99,935.00 0.65 36.46 99,968.69 94,694.50

Page 10 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/06/2020 1.800% 02/06/2025
69371RQ66 175,000.00 A+ A1 10/22/20 10/29/20 182,894.25 0.73 481.25 178,423.71 166,429.73

AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.250% 03/04/2025
025816CQ0 80,000.00 BBB+ A2 03/01/22 03/04/22 79,919.20 2.29 135.00 79,948.17 75,933.12

ROCHE HOLDINGS INC (CALLABLE)

CORPORATE
DTD 03/10/2022 2.132% 03/10/2025
771196BT8 410,000.00 AA Aa2 03/03/22 03/10/22 410,000.00 2.13 509.90 410,000.00 391,755.41

HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE
NOTE
DTD 03/28/2022 2.700% 04/15/2025
437076CM2 25,000.00 A A2 03/24/22 03/28/22 24,956.25 2.76 311.25 24,970.74 24,187.50

CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTES
DTD 04/27/2015 3.300% 04/27/2025
172967JP7 225,000.00 BBB+ A3 08/28/20 09/01/20 249,738.75 0.88 3,176.25 236,022.50 217,125.90 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 CORP NOTE
(CALL
DTD 05/03/2022 3.450% 05/01/2025
17252MAP5 65,000.00 A- A3 04/26/22 05/03/22 64,985.70 3.46 934.38 64,990.05 63,522.68

USAA CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/26/2022 3.375% 05/01/2025
90327QD89 225,000.00 AA Aa1 05/23/22 05/26/22 224,264.25 3.49 3,164.06 224,477.21 217,997.10

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP (CALLABLE)

CORP NO
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
369550BG2 225,000.00 A- A3 10/16/20 10/20/20 252,247.50 0.80 2,975.00 237,106.23 220,095.45

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP
NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025
46647PCH7 315,000.00 A- A1 05/24/21 06/01/21 315,000.00 0.82 865.20 315,000.00 298,597.95

AMAZON INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 06/03/2020 0.800% 06/03/2025
023135BQ8 475,000.00 AA A1 06/03/20 06/05/20 474,767.25 0.81 1,245.56 474,898.68 440,467.03

NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 06/09/2022 3.500% 06/09/2025
63254ABD9 250,000.00 AA- Aa3 05/31/22 06/09/22 250,000.00 3.50 2,722.22 250,000.00 242,419.00

Page 11 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/04/2022 3.450% 06/15/2025
63743HFE7 50,000.00 A- A2 04/27/22 05/04/22 49,986.50 3.46 507.92 49,990.44 48,522.25

IBM CORP CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 07/27/2022 4.000% 07/27/2025
459200KS9 225,000.00 A- A3 07/20/22 07/27/22 225,000.00 4.00 1,600.00 225,000.00 222,448.73

BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
DTD 07/30/2015 3.875% 08/01/2025
06051GFS3 225,000.00 A- A2 08/18/20 08/20/20 256,918.50 0.93 1,453.13 240,067.23 220,001.40

ABBOTT LABORATORIES CORPORATE

NOTES (CAL
DTD 03/22/2017 3.875% 09/15/2025
002824BM1 225,000.00 AA- A1 09/24/20 09/28/20 257,845.50 0.86 387.50 240,382.61 222,825.15

BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 12/06/2021 1.530% 12/06/2025
06051GKE8 225,000.00 A- A2 12/01/21 12/06/21 225,000.00 1.53 1,099.69 225,000.00 210,806.55

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/24/2022 2.595% 02/24/2026
46647PCV6 175,000.00 A- A1 02/16/22 02/24/22 175,000.00 2.60 466.74 175,000.00 166,674.73

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 05/19/2021 1.150% 05/15/2026
91324PEC2 225,000.00 A+ A3 05/17/21 05/19/21 224,608.50 1.19 977.50 224,755.04 204,341.18

BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE)

CORPORATE
DTD 08/12/2021 1.250% 08/12/2026
05565EBW4 175,000.00 A A2 08/12/21 08/16/21 174,947.50 1.26 297.74 174,964.59 156,920.58

CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/08/2027
14913R2U0 225,000.00 A A2 01/11/22 01/13/22 223,863.75 1.81 881.88 224,140.17 205,272.23

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 40,000.00 A A2 01/19/22 01/24/22 39,932.00 1.99 164.67 39,948.17 36,981.84

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 475,000.00 A A1 01/26/22 01/28/22 473,945.50 2.10 1,758.16 474,192.94 426,122.98

Page 12 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

MICROSOFT CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/06/2017 3.300% 02/06/2027
594918BY9 750,000.00 AAA Aaa 03/14/23 03/17/23 721,942.50 4.36 3,781.25 722,238.47 735,940.50

AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.550% 03/04/2027
025816CS6 300,000.00 BBB+ A2 01/13/23 01/18/23 277,203.00 4.59 573.75 278,308.03 277,332.30

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/15/2022 2.300% 03/15/2027
084664CZ2 475,000.00 AA Aa2 03/15/22 03/17/22 466,089.00 2.70 485.56 467,945.46 448,794.25

CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 09/24/2021 3.300% 04/01/2027
808513BW4 300,000.00 A A2 02/17/23 02/22/23 284,925.00 4.66 4,950.00 285,307.15 276,603.90

NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027
63254ABE7 500,000.00 AA- Aa3 01/13/23 01/18/23 488,325.00 4.50 6,074.44 488,856.67 489,807.00

APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 09/12/2017 2.900% 09/12/2027
037833DB3 775,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/19/23 01/23/23 741,062.75 3.94 1,186.18 742,425.85 739,968.45

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 01/12/2023 4.625% 01/12/2028
89236TKQ7 375,000.00 A+ A1 02/08/23 02/10/23 376,282.50 4.55 3,805.99 376,246.82 379,041.00

NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP CORP NOTES
(CAL
DTD 02/07/2018 3.400% 02/07/2028
637432NP6 350,000.00 A- A1 02/17/23 02/22/23 329,189.00 4.76 1,785.00 329,625.67 332,439.10

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORP NOTES
(CALL
DTD 07/15/2020 3.900% 02/20/2028
110122DE5 375,000.00 A+ A2 03/09/23 03/13/23 358,263.75 4.93 1,665.63 358,439.92 367,566.75 Security Type Sub-Total 11,420,000.00 11,424,534.90 2.80 66,860.13 11,332,201.72 10,940,837.65 Certificate of Deposit

Page 13 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT
DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.600% 10/27/2025
89115B6K1 450,000.00 A A1 10/27/22 10/31/22 450,000.00 5.58 10,640.00 450,000.00 449,739.00

NORDEA BANK ABP NEW YORK CERT DEPOS
DTD 11/03/2022 5.530% 11/03/2025
65558UYF3 450,000.00 AA- Aa3 11/02/22 11/03/22 450,000.00 5.53 10,230.50 450,000.00 453,139.65 Security Type Sub-Total 900,000.00 900,000.00 5.56 20,870.50 900,000.00 902,878.65 Asset-Backed Security
GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
36261RAD0 85,000.00 NR Aaa 02/17/21 02/24/21 84,987.17 0.33 8.57 84,993.92 84,252.35 GMALT 2021-2 A4
DTD 05/26/2021 0.410% 05/20/2025
380144AD7 35,000.00 AAA NR 05/18/21 05/26/21 34,997.05 0.41 4.38 34,998.42 34,177.29 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 57,128.64 AAA NR 04/20/21 04/28/21 57,122.63 0.38 9.65 57,125.27 55,424.05 NAROT 2021-A A3
DTD 06/23/2021 0.330% 10/15/2025
65480BAC1 273,072.88 AAA Aaa 06/15/21 06/23/21 273,068.26 0.33 40.05 273,070.16 262,799.39 TAOT 2021-B A3
DTD 06/14/2021 0.260% 11/17/2025
89190GAC1 278,383.99 AAA NR 06/08/21 06/14/21 278,354.01 0.26 32.17 278,366.17 268,579.06 HAROT 2021-4 A3
DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026
43815GAC3 100,000.00 NR Aaa 11/16/21 11/24/21 99,978.92 0.89 24.44 99,985.76 95,414.99 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 89,088.86 AAA NR 04/13/21 04/21/21 89,069.66 0.52 20.59 89,077.39 86,011.81 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
44935FAD6 80,000.00 AAA NR 11/09/21 11/17/21 79,982.14 0.75 26.31 79,987.59 76,374.26 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
254683CP8 195,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/20/21 09/27/21 194,958.25 0.58 50.27 194,970.93 183,240.37 GMCAR 2021-4 A3
DTD 10/21/2021 0.680% 09/16/2026
362554AC1 85,000.00 AAA Aaa 10/13/21 10/21/21 84,997.83 0.68 24.08 84,998.47 80,596.32

Page 14 ends

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Asset-Backed Security
CARMX 2022-3 A3
DTD 07/20/2022 3.970% 04/15/2027
14318MAD1 210,000.00 AAA NR 07/12/22 07/20/22 209,995.04 3.97 370.53 209,995.77 205,584.83 NAROT 2022-B A3
DTD 09/28/2022 4.460% 05/17/2027
65480JAC4 140,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/20/22 09/28/22 139,971.03 4.46 277.51 139,974.20 138,969.18 GMCAR 2022-4 A3
DTD 10/12/2022 4.820% 08/16/2027
36265QAD8 275,000.00 AAA NR 10/04/22 10/12/22 274,954.93 4.82 552.29 274,959.29 275,665.50 TAOT 2023-A A3
DTD 01/30/2023 4.630% 09/15/2027
891940AC2 245,000.00 AAA NR 01/24/23 01/30/23 244,999.88 4.63 504.16 244,999.88 244,676.21 COMET 2022-A3 A
DTD 11/03/2022 4.950% 10/15/2027
14041NGB1 245,000.00 AAA NR 10/27/22 11/03/22 244,961.56 4.95 539.00 244,964.73 247,525.53 HDMOT 2023-A A3
DTD 02/23/2023 5.050% 12/15/2027
41285JAD0 170,000.00 NR Aaa 02/13/23 02/23/23 169,982.88 5.05 381.56 169,983.24 171,302.59 FORDO 2023-A A3
DTD 03/31/2023 4.650% 02/15/2028
344928AD8 130,000.00 AAA NR 03/28/23 03/31/23 129,986.44 4.65 16.79 129,986.45 130,238.44 Security Type Sub-Total 2,692,674.37 2,692,367.68 2.71 2,882.35 2,692,437.64 2,640,832.17 Managed Account Sub-Total 53,152,674.37 51,615,166.07 2.86 236,084.47 51,690,828.28 50,363,475.91 Joint Powers Authority
CAMP Pool 15,909.15 AAAm NR 15,909.15 0.00 15,909.15 15,909.15 Liquid Sub-Total 15,909.15 15,909.15 0.00 15,909.15 15,909.15 $53,168,583.52 $51,631,075.22 2.86% $236,084.47 $51,706,737.43 $50,379,385.06 $50,615,469.53
$236,084.47
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total

Page 15 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CDV0 6,275,000.00 CITIGRP 96.83 6,075,964.53 40,198.91 (6,511.76) DTD 01/31/2022 0.875% 01/31/2024

0.83 4.78
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YY0 500,000.00 WELLS_F 95.92 479,609.40 (54,804.66) (34,096.26) DTD 12/31/2019 1.750% 12/31/2024

1.72 4.19
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZW3 250,000.00 GOLDMAN 92.16 230,390.62 (14,765.63) (17,038.78) DTD 06/30/2020 0.250% 06/30/2025

2.25 3.92
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZW3 450,000.00 MERRILL 92.16 414,703.13 (28,951.17) (31,997.43) DTD 06/30/2020 0.250% 06/30/2025

2.25 3.92
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 150,000.00 CITIGRP 91.13 136,687.50 (10,365.23) (11,504.19) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 350,000.00 JPM_CHA 91.13 318,937.50 (25,921.88) (27,965.18) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 400,000.00 CITIGRP 91.13 364,500.00 (23,468.75) (27,363.12) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 450,000.00 JPM_CHA 91.13 410,062.50 (36,105.47) (37,543.97) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 650,000.00 BNP_PAR 91.13 592,312.50 (39,939.45) (45,937.31) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 825,000.00 CITIGRP 91.13 751,781.25 (62,455.08) (66,354.86) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.74 3.80
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBW0 75,000.00 BMO 91.16 68,367.19 (3,090.82) (4,038.58) DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026

3.04 3.82
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBW0 950,000.00 CITIGRP 91.16 865,984.37 (60,859.38) (67,475.45) DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026

3.04 3.82
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 200,000.00 BMO 90.19 180,375.00 1,367.19 (1,684.34) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 250,000.00 HSBC 90.19 225,468.75 (781.25) (5,859.58) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 750,000.00 BMO 90.19 676,406.25 (14,062.50) (23,868.61) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 800,000.00 HSBC 90.19 721,500.00 (10,843.75) (23,016.40) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 900,000.00 MERRILL 90.19 811,687.50 (7,347.66) (23,316.32) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78

Page 16 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCP4 900,000.00 BMO 90.19 811,687.50 (7,875.00) (20,613.72) DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026

3.30 3.78
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U24 250,000.00 BMO 94.03 235,078.12 6,933.59 4,736.17 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026

3.48 3.78
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U24 975,000.00 BMO 94.03 916,804.69 9,711.92 5,615.32 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026

3.48 3.78
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U24 2,100,000.00 HSBC 94.03 1,974,656.25 20,589.84 8,927.32 DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026

3.48 3.78
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U24 9,500,000.00 JPM_CHA 94.03 8,932,968.75 10,390.62 (20,173.91) DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026

3.48 3.78
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CEN7 1,200,000.00 BNP_PAR 96.38 1,156,500.00 1,078.12 (564.38) DTD 04/30/2022 2.750% 04/30/2027

3.84 3.71
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CFB2 800,000.00 BMO 96.30 770,375.04 23,843.79 22,979.25 DTD 07/31/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027

4.09 3.68
Security Type Sub-Total 29,950,000.00 28,122,808.34 (287,523.70) (454,666.09) 2.78 4.00 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE 459058JV6 245,000.00 TD 99.76 244,412.25 (80.60) (574.55) DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023

0.06 4.45
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES 459058JM6 500,000.00 TD 97.11 485,567.00 (13,358.00) (14,200.33) DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023

0.65 4.81
INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES 4581X0DZ8 635,000.00 JPM_CHA 94.56 600,476.32 (34,053.78) (34,291.73) DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024

1.48 4.33
Security Type Sub-Total 1,380,000.00 1,330,455.57 (47,492.38) (49,066.61) 0.91 4.53 Municipal Bond / Note
CT ST TXBL GO BONDS 20772KJW0 60,000.00 SIEBERT 96.70 58,020.60 (1,979.40) (1,979.40) DTD 06/11/2020 1.998% 07/01/2024

1.24 4.74
CHAFFEY UHSD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 157411TK5 100,000.00 RBC 96.74 96,740.00 (3,260.00) (3,260.00) DTD 12/05/2019 2.101% 08/01/2024

1.32 4.64
NY ST URBAN DEV CORP TXBL REV BONDS 650036DT0 325,000.00 WELLS_F 93.12 302,646.50 (22,353.50) (22,353.50) DTD 12/23/2020 0.870% 03/15/2025

1.94 4.58

Page 17 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Municipal Bond / Note
UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS 91412HGE7 85,000.00 JPM_CHA 04/15/25 93.05 79,092.50 (5,907.50) (5,907.50) DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025

2.02 4.34
FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 341271AD6 65,000.00 MERRILL 93.16 60,554.00 (4,905.55) (4,661.98) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025

2.22 4.48
FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 341271AD6 85,000.00 MERRILL 93.16 79,186.00 (6,377.55) (6,078.86) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025

2.22 4.48
FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 341271AD6 160,000.00 MERRILL 93.16 149,056.00 (10,944.00) (10,944.00) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025

2.22 4.48
MN ST TXBL GO BONDS 60412AVJ9 100,000.00 MORGAN_ 91.89 91,890.00 (8,110.00) (8,110.00) DTD 08/25/2020 0.630% 08/01/2025

2.32 4.32
SAN JUAN USD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 798306WP7 130,000.00 KEYBANC 92.30 119,988.70 (10,011.30) (10,011.30) DTD 10/29/2020 0.852% 08/01/2025

2.31 4.35
LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 54438CYK2 140,000.00 MERRILL 91.96 128,746.80 (11,253.20) (11,253.20) DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025

2.32 4.43
CA ST UNIV TXBL REV BONDS 13077DQD7 85,000.00 JPM_CHA 91.50 77,776.70 (7,223.30) (7,223.30) DTD 07/29/2021 0.862% 11/01/2025

2.55 4.37
CA ST MUNICIPAL BONDS 13063D3N6 200,000.00 WELLS_F 102.68 205,352.00 5,352.00 5,352.00 DTD 03/15/2023 4.846% 03/01/2027

3.61 4.10
Security Type Sub-Total 1,535,000.00 1,449,049.80 (86,973.30) (86,431.04) 2.29 4.43 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K043 A2 3137BGK24 250,000.00 CITIGRP 97.44 243,603.55 (18,779.26) (10,808.55) DTD 03/01/2015 3.062% 12/01/2024

1.58 4.66
Security Type Sub-Total 250,000.00 243,603.55 (18,779.26) (10,808.55) 1.58 4.66 Federal Agency Bond / Note
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEW5 225,000.00 NOMURA 98.02 220,536.23 (4,504.86) (4,469.75) DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023

0.44 4.87
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEW5 525,000.00 WELLS_F 98.02 514,584.52 (10,242.23) (10,390.26) DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023

0.44 4.87
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEY1 325,000.00 WELLS_F 97.49 316,844.13 (6,943.62) (7,936.67) DTD 10/16/2020 0.125% 10/16/2023

0.54 4.85

Page 18 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEZ8 350,000.00 CITIGRP 97.31 340,590.60 (9,094.40) (9,346.46) DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023

0.60 4.85
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06H1 325,000.00 NOMURA 97.06 315,434.60 (9,194.90) (9,484.34) DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023

0.66 4.85
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAFA2 300,000.00 CITIGRP 96.98 290,929.50 (8,773.50) (9,003.51) DTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023

0.68 4.84
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES 3130AJHU6 350,000.00 CITIGRP 92.91 325,178.70 (23,085.30) (24,113.19) DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025

2.03 4.16
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G03U5 350,000.00 CITIGRP 93.10 325,835.30 (23,443.70) (23,867.45) DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025

2.04 4.15
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEU9 425,000.00 WELLS_F 91.93 390,681.25 (32,202.25) (33,341.73) DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025

2.30 4.08
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G05X7 350,000.00 BARCLAY 91.65 320,782.70 (27,579.30) (28,429.73) DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025

2.39 4.06
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES 3130AK5E2 150,000.00 WELLS_F 91.59 137,386.50 (12,163.50) (12,394.07) DTD 09/11/2020 0.375% 09/04/2025

2.42 4.05
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEX3 700,000.00 CITIGRP 91.46 640,225.60 (57,667.40) (58,727.83) DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025

2.47 4.03
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06G3 650,000.00 BARCLAY 91.38 594,000.55 (53,672.45) (54,784.20) DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025

2.58 4.02
Security Type Sub-Total 5,025,000.00 4,733,010.18 (278,567.41) (286,289.19) 1.59 4.40 Corporate Note
PNC BANK NA CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 693475AV7 400,000.00 CITIGRP 12/23/23 98.12 392,482.80 (10,365.20) (7,944.72) DTD 01/23/2019 3.500% 01/23/2024

0.72 5.89
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES 808513BN4 105,000.00 CSFB 02/18/24 95.13 99,888.71 (5,058.79) (5,094.43) (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024

0.88 6.01
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP NOTES 06406RAS6 210,000.00 JPM_CHA 03/26/24 95.13 199,771.32 (10,003.98) (10,148.52) (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/26/2021 0.500% 04/26/2024

0.99 5.23
MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES 61746BDQ6 400,000.00 WELLS_FA 98.76 395,051.60 (27,864.40) (10,131.47) DTD 04/28/2014 3.875% 04/29/2024

1.05 5.06

Page 19 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP NOTE 02665WCZ2 400,000.00 WELLS_FA 97.03 388,121.20 (9,894.80) (11,381.98) DTD 06/27/2019 2.400% 06/27/2024

1.22 4.89
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 38141EC23 400,000.00 SUSQ 04/08/24 98.27 393,069.60 (25,562.40) (10,940.63) BONDS
DTD 07/08/2014 3.850% 07/08/2024

1.00 5.27
BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES 05565EBU8 70,000.00 GOLDMAN 94.63 66,240.58 (3,753.12) (3,756.55) DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024

1.36 4.86
WALT DISNEY COMPANY/THE (CALLABLE) 254687FK7 400,000.00 JPM_CHAS 07/30/24 96.14 384,575.60 (13,792.40) (14,960.80) DTD 09/06/2019 1.750% 08/30/2024

1.32 4.59
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE 24422EVU0 100,000.00 HSBC 94.69 94,694.50 (5,240.50) (5,274.19) NOTES
DTD 09/10/2021 0.625% 09/10/2024

1.44 4.46
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP CORPORATE 69371RQ66 175,000.00 MERRILL 95.10 166,429.73 (16,464.52) (11,993.98) NOTES
DTD 02/06/2020 1.800% 02/06/2025

1.82 4.59
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES 025816CQ0 80,000.00 BARCLAY 02/01/25 94.92 75,933.12 (3,986.08) (4,015.05) (CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.250% 03/04/2025

1.80 5.05
ROCHE HOLDINGS INC (CALLABLE) 771196BT8 410,000.00 DEUTSCH 02/10/25 95.55 391,755.41 (18,244.59) (18,244.59)

CORPORATE
DTD 03/10/2022 2.132% 03/10/2025

1.83 4.55
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE 437076CM2 25,000.00 MORGAN_ 03/15/25 96.75 24,187.50 (768.75) (783.24) NOTE
DTD 03/28/2022 2.700% 04/15/2025

1.90 4.38
CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTES 172967JP7 225,000.00 MKTX 96.50 217,125.90 (32,612.85) (18,896.60) DTD 04/27/2015 3.300% 04/27/2025

1.99 5.10
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 CORP NOTE 17252MAP5 65,000.00 KEYBANC 04/01/25 97.73 63,522.68 (1,463.02) (1,467.37) (CALL
DTD 05/03/2022 3.450% 05/01/2025

1.92 4.60
USAA CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE NOTES 90327QD89 225,000.00 MERRILL 96.89 217,997.10 (6,267.15) (6,480.11) DTD 05/26/2022 3.375% 05/01/2025

2.00 4.96
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP (CALLABLE) 369550BG2 225,000.00 JPM_CHA 03/15/25 97.82 220,095.45 (32,152.05) (17,010.78)

CORP NO
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025

1.88 4.59

Page 20 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP 46647PCH7 315,000.00 JPM_CHA 06/01/24 94.79 298,597.95 (16,402.05) (16,402.05) NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025

1.16 3.33
AMAZON INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 023135BQ8 475,000.00 GOLDMAN 05/03/25 92.73 440,467.03 (34,300.22) (34,431.65) DTD 06/03/2020 0.800% 06/03/2025

2.07 4.34
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY CORPORATE 63254ABD9 250,000.00 CITIGRP 96.97 242,419.00 (7,581.00) (7,581.00) NOTES
DTD 06/09/2022 3.500% 06/09/2025

2.11 4.98
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP CORPORATE 63743HFE7 50,000.00 RBC 97.04 48,522.25 (1,464.25) (1,468.19) NOTES
DTD 05/04/2022 3.450% 06/15/2025

2.12 4.88
IBM CORP CORPORATE NOTES 459200KS9 225,000.00 JPM_CHA 98.87 222,448.73 (2,551.27) (2,551.27) DTD 07/27/2022 4.000% 07/27/2025

2.23 4.52
BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES 06051GFS3 225,000.00 MERRILL 97.78 220,001.40 (36,917.10) (20,065.83) DTD 07/30/2015 3.875% 08/01/2025

2.24 4.89
ABBOTT LABORATORIES CORPORATE 002824BM1 225,000.00 US_BANC 06/15/25 99.03 222,825.15 (35,020.35) (17,557.46)

NOTES (CAL
DTD 03/22/2017 3.875% 09/15/2025

2.13 4.29
BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES 06051GKE8 225,000.00 MERRILL 12/06/24 93.69 210,806.55 (14,193.45) (14,193.45) (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/06/2021 1.530% 12/06/2025

1.66 4.03
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES 46647PCV6 175,000.00 JPM_CHA 02/24/25 95.24 166,674.73 (8,325.27) (8,325.27) (CALLABLE
DTD 02/24/2022 2.595% 02/24/2026

1.86 4.36
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC (CALLABLE) 91324PEC2 225,000.00 CITIGRP 04/15/26 90.82 204,341.18 (20,267.32) (20,413.86) CORPOR
DTD 05/19/2021 1.150% 05/15/2026

2.98 4.32
BMW US CAPITAL LLC (CALLABLE) 05565EBW4 175,000.00 MITSU 07/12/26 89.67 156,920.58 (18,026.92) (18,044.01)

CORPORATE
DTD 08/12/2021 1.250% 08/12/2026

3.22 4.60
CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE CORPORATE 14913R2U0 225,000.00 JPM_CHA 91.23 205,272.23 (18,591.52) (18,867.94) NOTES
DTD 01/10/2022 1.700% 01/08/2027

3.65 4.24

Page 21 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 87612EBM7 40,000.00 CITIGRP 12/15/26 92.45 36,981.84 (2,950.16) (2,966.33) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027

3.57 4.12
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) 06406RBA4 475,000.00 DEUTSCH 12/26/26 89.71 426,122.98 (47,822.52) (48,069.96) CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027

3.60 5.04
MICROSOFT CORP CORP NOTES 594918BY9 750,000.00 GOLDMAN 11/06/26 98.13 735,940.50 13,998.00 13,702.03 (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/06/2017 3.300% 02/06/2027

3.40 3.83
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES 025816CS6 300,000.00 RBS 02/01/27 92.44 277,332.30 129.30 (975.73) (CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.550% 03/04/2027

3.66 4.68
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY CORP NOTES 084664CZ2 475,000.00 SEEL 02/15/27 94.48 448,794.25 (17,294.75) (19,151.21) (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/15/2022 2.300% 03/15/2027

3.72 3.81
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES 808513BW4 300,000.00 BARCLAY 01/01/27 92.20 276,603.90 (8,321.10) (8,703.25) (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/24/2021 3.300% 04/01/2027

3.49 5.50
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK/NY CORPORATE 63254ABE7 500,000.00 CBAA 97.96 489,807.00 1,482.00 950.33 NOTES
DTD 06/09/2022 3.905% 06/09/2027

3.86 4.44
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS 037833DB3 775,000.00 TD 06/12/27 95.48 739,968.45 (1,094.30) (2,457.40) DTD 09/12/2017 2.900% 09/12/2027

3.97 4.02
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TKQ7 375,000.00 WELLS_F 101.08 379,041.00 2,758.50 2,794.18

CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 01/12/2023 4.625% 01/12/2028

4.31 4.37
NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP CORP NOTES 637432NP6 350,000.00 MORGAN_ 11/07/27 94.98 332,439.10 3,250.10 2,813.43 (CAL
DTD 02/07/2018 3.400% 02/07/2028

4.27 4.56
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORP NOTES 110122DE5 375,000.00 MKTX 11/20/27 98.02 367,566.75 9,303.00 9,126.83 (CALL
DTD 07/15/2020 3.900% 02/20/2028

4.26 4.35
Security Type Sub-Total 11,420,000.00 10,940,837.65 (483,697.25) (391,364.07) 2.59 4.57

Page 22 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Certificate of Deposit
TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT 89115B6K1 450,000.00 TD 99.94 449,739.00 (261.00) (261.00) DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.600% 10/27/2025

3.26 5.59
NORDEA BANK ABP NEW YORK CERT 65558UYF3 450,000.00 WELLS_F 100.70 453,139.65 3,139.65 3,139.65 DEPOS
DTD 11/03/2022 5.530% 11/03/2025

2.40 5.24
Security Type Sub-Total 900,000.00 902,878.65 2,878.65 2,878.65 2.83 5.41 Asset-Backed Security
GMALT 2021-1 A4 36261RAD0 85,000.00 RBC 99.12 84,252.35 (734.82) (741.57) DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025

0.21 0.80
GMALT 2021-2 A4 380144AD7 35,000.00 SOCGEN 97.65 34,177.29 (819.76) (821.13) DTD 05/26/2021 0.410% 05/20/2025

0.55 1.53
HART 2021-A A3 44933LAC7 57,128.64 BARCLAY 97.02 55,424.05 (1,698.58) (1,701.22) DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025

0.61 1.62
NAROT 2021-A A3 65480BAC1 273,072.88 MITSU 96.24 262,799.39 (10,268.87) (10,270.77) DTD 06/23/2021 0.330% 10/15/2025

0.74 1.85
TAOT 2021-B A3 89190GAC1 278,383.99 CITIGRP 96.48 268,579.06 (9,774.95) (9,787.11) DTD 06/14/2021 0.260% 11/17/2025

0.70 1.63
HAROT 2021-4 A3 43815GAC3 100,000.00 MERRILL 95.42 95,414.99 (4,563.93) (4,570.77) DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026

1.08 2.57
CARMX 2021-2 A3 14314QAC8 89,088.86 MERRILL 96.55 86,011.81 (3,057.85) (3,065.58) DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026

0.68 1.75
HART 2021-C A3 44935FAD6 80,000.00 SMBC 95.47 76,374.26 (3,607.88) (3,613.33) DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026

1.04 2.24
DCENT 2021-A1 A1 254683CP8 195,000.00 CITIGRP 93.97 183,240.37 (11,717.88) (11,730.56) DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026

1.42 2.40
GMCAR 2021-4 A3 362554AC1 85,000.00 JPM_CHA 94.82 80,596.32 (4,401.51) (4,402.15) DTD 10/21/2021 0.680% 09/16/2026

1.12 2.24
CARMX 2022-3 A3 14318MAD1 210,000.00 RBC 97.90 205,584.83 (4,410.21) (4,410.94) DTD 07/20/2022 3.970% 04/15/2027

1.60 4.54
NAROT 2022-B A3 65480JAC4 140,000.00 WELLS_F 99.26 138,969.18 (1,001.85) (1,005.02) DTD 09/28/2022 4.460% 05/17/2027

1.93 4.66

Page 23 ends

Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Asset-Backed Security
GMCAR 2022-4 A3 36265QAD8 275,000.00 RBC 100.24 275,665.50 710.57 706.21 DTD 10/12/2022 4.820% 08/16/2027

1.90 4.76
TAOT 2023-A A3 891940AC2 245,000.00 MERRILL 99.87 244,676.21 (323.67) (323.67) DTD 01/30/2023 4.630% 09/15/2027

2.07 4.66
COMET 2022-A3 A 14041NGB1 245,000.00 RBC 101.03 247,525.53 2,563.97 2,560.80 DTD 11/03/2022 4.950% 10/15/2027

2.34 4.70
HDMOT 2023-A A3 41285JAD0 170,000.00 JPM_CHA 100.77 171,302.59 1,319.71 1,319.35 DTD 02/23/2023 5.050% 12/15/2027

2.18 4.87
FORDO 2023-A A3 344928AD8 130,000.00 BNP_PAR 100.18 130,238.44 252.00 251.99 DTD 03/31/2023 4.650% 02/15/2028

2.25 4.61
Security Type Sub-Total 2,692,674.37 2,640,832.17 (51,535.51) (51,605.47) 1.48 3.39 Managed Account Sub-Total 53,152,674.37 50,363,475.91 (1,251,690.16) (1,327,352.37) 2.49 4.19 Joint Powers Authority
CAMP Pool 15,909.15 1.00 15,909.15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Liquid Sub-Total 15,909.15 15,909.15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Investments $50,615,469.53
$236,084.47
$50,379,385.06
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $53,168,583.52 ($1,251,690.16) ($1,327,352.37) 2.49 4.19%

Page 24 ends

Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
03/06/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/31/2022 2.750% 07/31/2027
03/02/23 91282CFB2 800,000.00 (746,531.25) (2,066.30) (748,597.55) 03/13/23 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORP

NOTES (CALL
DTD 07/15/2020 3.900% 02/20/2028
03/09/23 110122DE5 375,000.00 (358,263.75) (934.38) (359,198.13) 03/15/23 CA ST MUNICIPAL BONDS
DTD 03/15/2023 4.846% 03/01/2027
03/09/23 13063D3N6 200,000.00 (200,000.00) 0.00 (200,000.00) 03/17/23 MICROSOFT CORP CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/06/2017 3.300% 02/06/2027
03/14/23 594918BY9 750,000.00 (721,942.50) (2,818.75) (724,761.25) 03/31/23 FORDO 2023-A A3
DTD 03/31/2023 4.650% 02/15/2028
03/28/23 344928AD8 130,000.00 (129,986.44) 0.00 (129,986.44) Transaction Type Sub-Total 2,255,000.00 (2,156,723.94) (5,819.43) (2,162,543.37)

INTEREST
03/25/23 FHMS K043 A2
DTD 03/01/2015 3.062% 12/01/2024
03/01/23 3137BGK24 250,000.00 0.00 637.92 637.92
03/04/23 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.250% 03/04/2025
03/04/23 025816CQ0 80,000.00 0.00 900.00 900.00
03/04/23 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 03/04/2022 2.550% 03/04/2027
03/04/23 025816CS6 300,000.00 0.00 3,825.00 3,825.00
03/04/23 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 09/11/2020 0.375% 09/04/2025
03/04/23 3130AK5E2 150,000.00 0.00 281.25 281.25
03/08/23 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
03/08/23 3137EAEW5 750,000.00 0.00 937.50 937.50
03/10/23 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP

CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 09/10/2021 0.625% 09/10/2024
03/10/23 24422EVU0 100,000.00 0.00 312.50 312.50
03/10/23 ROCHE HOLDINGS INC (CALLABLE)

CORPORATE
DTD 03/10/2022 2.132% 03/10/2025
03/10/23 771196BT8 410,000.00 0.00 4,370.60 4,370.60

Page 25 ends

Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

INTEREST
03/12/23 APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
DTD 09/12/2017 2.900% 09/12/2027
03/12/23 037833DB3 775,000.00 0.00 11,237.50 11,237.50
03/15/23 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
03/15/23 14314QAC8 94,444.15 0.00 40.93 40.93
03/15/23 CARMX 2022-3 A3
DTD 07/20/2022 3.970% 04/15/2027
03/15/23 14318MAD1 210,000.00 0.00 694.75 694.75
03/15/23 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
03/15/23 44933LAC7 61,330.92 0.00 19.42 19.42
03/15/23 NAROT 2022-B A3
DTD 09/28/2022 4.460% 05/17/2027
03/15/23 65480JAC4 140,000.00 0.00 520.33 520.33
03/15/23 NAROT 2021-A A3
DTD 06/23/2021 0.330% 10/15/2025
03/15/23 65480BAC1 289,336.83 0.00 79.57 79.57
03/15/23 NY ST URBAN DEV CORP TXBL REV
BONDS
DTD 12/23/2020 0.870% 03/15/2025
03/15/23 650036DT0 325,000.00 0.00 1,413.75 1,413.75
03/15/23 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
03/15/23 254683CP8 195,000.00 0.00 94.25 94.25
03/15/23 TAOT 2021-B A3
DTD 06/14/2021 0.260% 11/17/2025
03/15/23 89190GAC1 296,281.73 0.00 64.19 64.19
03/15/23 TAOT 2023-A A3
DTD 01/30/2023 4.630% 09/15/2027
03/15/23 891940AC2 245,000.00 0.00 945.29 945.29
03/15/23 ABBOTT LABORATORIES CORPORATE

NOTES (CAL
DTD 03/22/2017 3.875% 09/15/2025
03/15/23 002824BM1 225,000.00 0.00 4,359.38 4,359.38
03/15/23 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/15/2022 2.300% 03/15/2027
03/15/23 084664CZ2 475,000.00 0.00 5,462.50 5,462.50
03/15/23 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
03/15/23 44935FAD6 80,000.00 0.00 49.33 49.33
03/15/23 HDMOT 2023-A A3
DTD 02/23/2023 5.050% 12/15/2027
03/15/23 41285JAD0 170,000.00 0.00 524.64 524.64
03/15/23 COMET 2022-A3 A
DTD 11/03/2022 4.950% 10/15/2027
03/15/23 14041NGB1 245,000.00 0.00 1,010.63 1,010.63

Page 26 ends

Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

INTEREST
03/16/23 GMCAR 2022-4 A3
DTD 10/12/2022 4.820% 08/16/2027
03/16/23 36265QAD8 275,000.00 0.00 1,104.58 1,104.58
03/16/23 GMCAR 2021-4 A3
DTD 10/21/2021 0.680% 09/16/2026
03/16/23 362554AC1 85,000.00 0.00 48.17 48.17
03/18/23 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
03/18/23 808513BN4 105,000.00 0.00 393.75 393.75
03/20/23 GMALT 2021-2 A4
DTD 05/26/2021 0.410% 05/20/2025
03/20/23 380144AD7 35,000.00 0.00 11.96 11.96
03/20/23 GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
03/20/23 36261RAD0 85,000.00 0.00 23.38 23.38
03/21/23 HAROT 2021-4 A3
DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026
03/21/23 43815GAC3 100,000.00 0.00 73.33 73.33
03/23/23 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
03/23/23 3137EAEX3 700,000.00 0.00 1,312.50 1,312.50
03/23/23 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
03/23/23 4581X0DZ8 635,000.00 0.00 1,587.50 1,587.50
Transaction Type Sub-Total 7,886,393.63 0.00 42,336.40 42,336.40

MATURITY
03/17/23 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK CERT
DEPOS
DTD 03/23/2021 0.590% 03/17/2023
03/17/23 22552G3C2 250,000.00 250,000.00 1,495.49 251,495.49 0.00 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total 250,000.00 250,000.00 1,495.49 251,495.49 0.00 0.00

PAYDOWNS
03/15/23 TAOT 2021-B A3
DTD 06/14/2021 0.260% 11/17/2025
03/15/23 89190GAC1 17,897.74 17,897.74 0.00 17,897.74 1.93 0.00 03/15/23 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
03/15/23 14314QAC8 5,355.29 5,355.29 0.00 5,355.29 1.15 0.00 03/15/23 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
03/15/23 44933LAC7 4,202.28 4,202.28 0.00 4,202.28 0.44 0.00

Page 27 ends

Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

PAYDOWNS
03/15/23 NAROT 2021-A A3
DTD 06/23/2021 0.330% 10/15/2025
03/15/23 65480BAC1 16,263.95 16,263.95 0.00 16,263.95 0.27 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total 43,719.26 43,719.26 0.00 43,719.26 3.79 0.00 SELL
03/06/23 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
03/02/23 3137EAEW5 150,000.00 146,293.50 185.42 146,478.92 (3,733.89) (3,711.14) FIFO 03/15/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/31/2022 0.875% 01/31/2024
03/08/23 91282CDV0 200,000.00 192,343.75 207.87 192,551.62 (31.25) (1,178.02) FIFO 03/13/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/31/2022 0.875% 01/31/2024
03/09/23 91282CDV0 400,000.00 384,890.63 396.41 385,287.04 140.63 (2,072.43) FIFO 03/17/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
03/14/23 912828U24 50,000.00 46,576.17 337.02 46,913.19 947.26 552.32 FIFO 03/17/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
03/14/23 912828U24 350,000.00 326,033.21 2,359.11 328,392.32 3,458.99 580.75 FIFO 03/31/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/31/2022 0.875% 01/31/2024
03/28/23 91282CDV0 125,000.00 121,254.88 178.26 121,433.14 1,020.50 102.58 FIFO Transaction Type Sub-Total 1,275,000.00 1,217,392.14 3,664.09 1,221,056.23 1,802.24 (5,725.94) Managed Account Sub-Total (645,612.54) 41,676.55 (603,935.99) 1,806.03 (5,725.94) Total Security Transactions ($645,612.54) $41,676.55 ($603,935.99) $1,806.03 ($5,725.94)

Page 28 ends

Account Statement For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Trade Settlement Share or Dollar Amount Total
Date Date Transaction Description Unit Price of Transaction Shares Owned CAMP Pool
Opening Balance 622,218.03
03/06/23 03/06/23 Purchase - Interest 025816CQ0 1.00 900.00 623,118.03 03/06/23 03/06/23 Purchase - Interest 025816CS6 1.00 3,825.00 626,943.03 03/06/23 03/06/23 Purchase - Interest 3130AK5E2 1.00 281.25 627,224.28 03/06/23 03/06/23 Purchase - Principal 3137EAEW5 1.00 146,293.50 773,517.78 03/06/23 03/06/23 Purchase - Interest 3137EAEW5 1.00 185.42 773,703.20 03/06/23 03/06/23 Redemption - Interest 91282CFB2 1.00 (2,066.30) 771,636.90 03/06/23 03/06/23 Redemption - Principal 91282CFB2 1.00 (746,531.25) 25,105.65 03/08/23 03/08/23 Purchase - Interest 3137EAEW5 1.00 937.50 26,043.15 03/10/23 03/10/23 Purchase - Interest 24422EVU0 1.00 312.50 26,355.65 03/10/23 03/10/23 Purchase - Interest 771196BT8 1.00 4,370.60 30,726.25 03/13/23 03/13/23 Purchase - Interest 037833DB3 1.00 11,237.50 41,963.75 03/13/23 03/13/23 Purchase - Interest 91282CDV0 1.00 396.41 42,360.16 03/13/23 03/13/23 Purchase - Principal 91282CDV0 1.00 384,890.63 427,250.79 03/13/23 03/13/23 Redemption - Principal 110122DE5 1.00 (358,263.75) 68,987.04 03/13/23 03/13/23 Redemption - Interest 110122DE5 1.00 (934.38) 68,052.66 03/15/23 03/15/23 Class Action GSE Proceeds Individual Portfolio Interest from 3/13/2023 1.00 805.03 68,857.69 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 14041NGB1 1.00 1,010.63 69,868.32 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 002824BM1 1.00 4,359.38 74,227.70 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 084664CZ2 1.00 5,462.50 79,690.20 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 650036DT0 1.00 1,413.75 81,103.95 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 14314QAC8 1.00 40.93 81,144.88

Page 29 ends

Account Statement For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Trade Settlement Share or Dollar Amount Total
Date Date Transaction Description Unit Price of Transaction Shares Owned CAMP Pool
03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 14318MAD1 1.00 694.75 81,839.63 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 254683CP8 1.00 94.25 81,933.88 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 41285JAD0 1.00 524.64 82,458.52 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 44933LAC7 1.00 19.42 82,477.94 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 44935FAD6 1.00 49.33 82,527.27 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 65480BAC1 1.00 79.57 82,606.84 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 65480JAC4 1.00 520.33 83,127.17 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 89190GAC1 1.00 64.19 83,191.36 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 891940AC2 1.00 945.29 84,136.65 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Interest 91282CDV0 1.00 207.87 84,344.52 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Principal 91282CDV0 1.00 192,343.75 276,688.27 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Principal 14314QAC8 1.00 5,355.29 282,043.56 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Principal 44933LAC7 1.00 4,202.28 286,245.84 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Principal 65480BAC1 1.00 16,263.95 302,509.79 03/15/23 03/15/23 Purchase - Principal 89190GAC1 1.00 17,897.74 320,407.53 03/15/23 03/15/23 Redemption - Principal 13063D3N6 1.00 (200,000.00) 120,407.53 03/16/23 03/16/23 Purchase - Interest 36265QAD8 1.00 1,104.58 121,512.11 03/16/23 03/16/23 Purchase - Interest 362554AC1 1.00 48.17 121,560.28 03/17/23 03/17/23 Purchase - Interest 912828U24 1.00 2,696.13 124,256.41 03/17/23 03/17/23 Purchase - Principal 912828U24 1.00 372,609.38 496,865.79 03/17/23 03/17/23 Purchase - Principal 22552G3C2 1.00 251,495.49 748,361.28 03/17/23 03/17/23 Redemption - Principal 594918BY9 1.00 (721,942.50) 26,418.78

Page 30 ends

Account Statement For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Trade Settlement Share or Dollar Amount Total
Date Date Transaction Description Unit Price of Transaction Shares Owned CAMP Pool
03/17/23 03/17/23 Redemption - Interest 594918BY9 1.00 (2,818.75) 23,600.03 03/20/23 03/20/23 Purchase - Interest 808513BN4 1.00 393.75 23,993.78 03/20/23 03/20/23 Purchase - Interest 380144AD7 1.00 11.96 24,005.74 03/20/23 03/20/23 Purchase - Interest 36261RAD0 1.00 23.38 24,029.12 03/21/23 03/21/23 Purchase - Interest 43815GAC3 1.00 73.33 24,102.45 03/23/23 03/23/23 Purchase - Interest 3137EAEX3 1.00 1,312.50 25,414.95 03/23/23 03/23/23 Purchase - Interest 4581X0DZ8 1.00 1,587.50 27,002.45 03/24/23 03/24/23 IP Fees February 2023 1.00 (3,480.21) 23,522.24 03/24/23 03/24/23 U.S. Bank Fees January 2023 1.00 (222.43) 23,299.81 03/27/23 03/27/23 Purchase - Interest 3137BGK24 1.00 637.92 23,937.73 03/31/23 03/31/23 Purchase - Interest 91282CDV0 1.00 178.26 24,115.99 03/31/23 03/31/23 Purchase - Principal 91282CDV0 1.00 121,254.88 145,370.87 03/31/23 03/31/23 Redemption - Principal 344928AD8 1.00 (129,986.44) 15,384.43 03/31/23 04/03/23 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment - Distributions 1.00 524.72 15,909.15

Page 31 ends

Account Statement For the Month Ending March 31, 2023

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - LAKE ELSINORE - CITY FUNDS
Trade Settlement Share or Dollar Amount Total
Date Date Transaction Description Unit Price of Transaction Shares Owned 15,909.15
15,909.15
15,909.15
130,168.89
22,838.37

0.00 (22,894,197.78)
22,863,236.52
46,870.41
524.72
15,909.15

0.00 (2,166,246.01)
1,559,937.13
622,218.03
Monthly Distribution Yield
Average Monthly Balance
Closing Balance
Month of Fiscal YTD
Cash Dividends and Income
Closing Balance
Check Disbursements
Redemptions (Excl. Checks)
Purchases
Opening Balance
Closing Balance
March January-March

4.80%

Page 32 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency From: Jason Simpson, Executive Director
Prepared by: Shannon Buckley, Assistant Executive Director Date: April 25, 2023
Subject: Agreement with AK Security Alarm, LLC for On-Call Minor Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Services
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with AK Security Alarm, LLC for on-call minor construction, maintenance, and operations services in an amount not to exceed $200,000 in such final form as approved by the Agency Attorney.

Background
On-call contracts allow the Agency to mobilize maintenance and construction services quickly and easily under pre-negotiated terms and conditions. The Agency requires contractor services to resolve urgent matters surrounding changing standards predicated by major league baseball and other outside agencies. For an Agency who needs to engage a general or specific maintenance or construction service, the benefits of having an on-call contract in place include:

Wide span of technical expertise
Resource availability and flexibility
Commitments as needed for services
Accelerated procurement and authorization
Independent and objective assessments and proposals
Validation of resolution-oriented actions
The on-call and minor construction services in the Agency are an essential resource to maintain stadium amenities and efficiently maintain the facility to meet major league baseball standards.

Staff initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) for annual on-call and minor construction contractor services. Utilizing the submittal from this contractor an additional agreement is needed to sustain these important services. AK Security Alarm LLC has provided essential contractor services in accordance with the agreement scope of work which includes but is not limited to the below maintenance/minor construction and repair trade areas commonly utilized by the Agency and listed below:

Agreement with AK Security Alarm, LLC

Page 2 of 2 ends

Alarm System Blue Printing Horn and Strobe Installation Electrical / Low Voltage Fire Suppression Alarm
Security Camera Services Fire System Testing
Data & Communication Fire System Maintenance
Minor Construction and Repair HVAC Emergency Sensors
Discussion
This on-call contractor will perform a wide variety of on-call repair and security alarm services. All assigned work will be proposed in writing, reviewed, and negotiated by Staff and approved prior to execution. AK Security Alarm LLC has performed as both a contractor and sub-contractor on several large Agency projects at the Diamond Stadium.

This agreement is needed to ensure the continued on-call repair and security alarm services support is in place for immediate operational demands. The sustainment of these essential general requirements provides the Agency far reaching facility rehabilitation and immediate maintenance augmentation of repair and security alarm services.

Following the approval of this Agenda item work and execution of the attached agreement services will be immediately available to the Agency. Staff has reviewed and verified that the contractor has valid licenses. A review of the contractor’s references and General and Auto Liability Insurances and Workers’ Compensation Insurance will be in place naming the Agency as additional insured.

Fiscal Impact
Funds are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2023/24 budget.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - On-Call & Minor Construction Agreement
Exhibit A - Proposal dated 08/08/2022

Page 1 ends

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES
AK Security Alarm LLC ON-CALL SERVICES
This Agreement for Contractor Services (On-Call) (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of April 18, 2023 by and between the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, a public body, corporate and politic established pursuant to Section 34173 of the Health and Safety Code (the “Agency”) and AK Security Alarm LLC., a corporation (the “Contractor”).

RECITALS
A. The Agency has determined that it requires the following services:

On-call Contractor Services
B. The Agency has prepared a request for a proposals and Contractor has submitted to Agency a proposal, dated August 8, 2022, both of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A (collectively, the "Contractor's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide services and related work to the Agency pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

C. Contractor possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services and related work described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Contractor shall perform the services and related work described in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A). Contractor shall provide such services and related work at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the Agency through its staff that it may provide from time to time. Contractor acknowledges that the Scope of Services provides for 24 hour-a-day, 7 day-a-week, on-call and minor construction support on an as needed basis.

2. Time of Performance.
a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the services and related work to be performed by Contractor is an essential condition of this Agreement. Contractor shall prosecute regularly and diligently the services and related work contemplated pursuant to this Agreement consistent with Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A) and shall provide, furnish and pay all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all taxes, utility and transportation services required to perform such the services and related work.
b. Performance Schedule. Contractor shall commence the services and related work pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services and related work within the time period(s) established in the Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Contractor, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the Executive Director.

Page 2 ends

c. Term and Compliance with Task/Work Order System. Unless earlier terminated as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for a period commencing on April 18, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024. The Agency may, at its sole discretion, extend the term of this Agreement on a 12-month basis not to exceed 2 additional twelve (12) month renewal terms by giving written notice thereof to Contractor not less than thirty (30) days before the end of the contract term, such notice to be exercised by the Executive Director.

Contractor hereby agrees and acknowledges that any and all work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be based upon the issuance of a Task/Work Order by the Agency. Contractor acknowledges that it is not guaranteed any minimum or specific amount of work or services as all work or services shall be authorized through a Task/Work Order issued by the Agency.

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Contractor shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Contractor's Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Contractor's annual compensation exceed two hundred thousand ($200,000.00) without additional written authorization from the Agency. Notwithstanding any provision of Contractor's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by Agency under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the Agency at the time of payment.

4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the Agency describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the Agency receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. Agency shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Background Checks. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City reserves the right to make an independent investigation into the background of Contractor’s personnel who perform work required by this Agreement, including but not limited to their references, character, address history, past employment, education, social security number validation, and criminal or police records, for the purpose of confirming that such personnel are lawfully employed, qualified to provide the subject service or pose a risk to the safety of persons or property in and around the vicinity of where the services will be rendered or City Hall. If the Agency makes a reasonable determination that any of Contractor’s prospective or then current personnel is deemed objectionable, then the Agency may notify Contractor of the same. Contractor shall not use that personnel to perform work required by this Agreement, and if necessary, shall replace him or her with a suitable worker.

6. Suspension or Termination.
a. The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,

Page 3 ends

provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the Agency, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein.

7. Plans, Reports, Documents
a. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Contractor, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the Agency upon payment to Contractor for such work, and the Agency shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Contractor or to any other party. Contractor shall, at Contractor's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to Agency upon written request. Agency shall have sole determination of the public’s rights to documents under the Public Records Act, and any third-party requests of Contractor shall be immediately referred to Agency, without any other actions by Contractor. b. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for Agency to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that Agency is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data, which were prepared by design professionals other than Contractor or provided, to Contractor by the Agency. Agency shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Agency's solerisk. c. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Contractor. Contractor shall not, without the prior written consent of Agency, use such materials for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Contractor, which is otherwise known to Contractor or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Contractor shall not use Agency's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Contractor's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Contractor's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Agency.

8. Contractor's Books and Records.
a. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to Agency for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor to this Agreement.
b. Contractor shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate

Page 4 ends

performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the Executive Director, Agency Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the Agency for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Contractor's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where Agency has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Contractor's business, Agency may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the Agency and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Contractor, Contractor's representatives, or Contractor's successor-in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor.
a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent contractor pursuant to California Labor Code Section 3353. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the Agency. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against Agency, or bind Agency in any manner. b. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Contractor and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by Agency, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of Agency and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by Agency for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the Agency, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Agency for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of Agency.

11. Interests of Contractor. Contractor (including principals, associates and management employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Contractor's services hereunder. Contractor further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such

Page 5 ends

interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Contractor is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Contractor:
a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the Agency or of any Agency official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any Agency decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a) (2).)

12. Ability of Contractor. Agency has relied upon the training and ability of Contractor to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Contractor shall therefore provide properly skilled personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Contractor under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent contractors in Contractor's field of expertise.

13. Compliance with Laws.
a. Contractor shall comply with all local, state and federal laws and regulations applicable to the services required hereunder, including any rule, regulation or bylaw governing the conduct or performance of Contractor and/or its employees, officers, or board members. b. Contractor represents that it has obtained and will maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement all professional and/or business licenses, certifications and/or permits necessary for performing the services described in this Agreement, including a City business license.

14. Licenses. Contractor represents and warrants to Agency that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature, which are legally required of Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor represents and warrants to Agency that Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Contractor to practice its profession. Contractor shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license.

Page 6 ends

15. Indemnity. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Agency and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Contractor shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Agency or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Contractor or its employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by Agency of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply.

By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.

16. Insurance Requirements .
a. Insurance. Contractor, at Contractor's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Contractor shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance andEmployer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees inaccordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the Agency at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against Agency, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Contractor for Agency. In the event that Contractor is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Contractor shall submit to the Agency a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the Agency Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage.

Page 7 ends

iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Contractor arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language :
i. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, the protection offered by all policies, except for Workers’ Compensation, shall bear an endorsement whereby it is provided that, the Agency and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers and agents and independent contractors, including without limitation, the Executive Director and Agency Attorney, are named as additional insureds. Additional insureds shall be entitled to the full benefit of all insurance policies in the same manner and to the same extent as any other insureds and there shall be no limitation to the benefits conferred upon them other than policy limits to coverages.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the Agency, itselected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the Agency, including any self-insured retention the Agency may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the Agency, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the Agency, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the Agency.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Agency. At the Agency's option, Contractor shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to Agency as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.

Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the Agency on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the Agency at all times during the term of this Agreement.

Page 8 ends

17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to Agency: Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: Executive Director
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: City Clerk
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
If to Contractor: AK Security Alarm LLC
Attn: Oscar Gomez
11521 Trailrun Court
Riverside CA 92505

18. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to Agency for entering into this Agreement is the reputation, experience and competence of Contractor. Contractor shall be fully responsible to Agency for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the Agency. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the Agency. If Agency consents to such subcontract, Contractor shall be fully responsible to Agency for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between Agency and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the Agency to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.

19. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

20. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

21. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.

22. Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed

Page 9 ends

to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Agency shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Agency, during the term of his or her service with Agency, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

23. Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.

24. Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Contractor agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the work or services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor shall bear all risks of payment or nonpayment of prevailing wages under California law, and Contractor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the Agency, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement.

25. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force andeffect.

26. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside.

27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The Executive Director is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the Agency to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non-monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement.

28. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

29. Entire Agreement; Incorporation; Conflict. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations described herein. All prior or contemporaneous understandings, agreements, representations and statements, oral or written, are superseded in total by this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Contractor’s Proposal is incorporated only for the description of the scope of services and/or the schedule of performance and no other terms and conditions from such proposal shall apply to this Agreement unless specifically

Page 10 ends

agreed to in writing. In the event of conflict, this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Contractor’s Proposal.

30. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Contractor and Agency and approved as to form by the Agency Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.
“AGENCY”

SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, a public body, corporate and
politic
Executive Director
ATTEST:

Agency Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Agency Attorney
Risk Manager
“CONTRACTOR”
AK Security Alarm LLC., a Corporation
By: Oscar Gomez
Its: Owner
Attachments: Exhibit A – Contractor’s Proposal

EXHIBIT A

CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL
[ATTACHED]
1 | Page

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

ON-CALL SERVICES
Lake Elsinore, CA
August 08, 2022
Akalarmsecurity.net
2 | Page
Table of Contents
Cover Letter.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Corporate Office Information:................................................................................................................ 3 Scope of Work...........................................................................................................................................4 ACTIVITIES............................................................................................................................................4 TERM.....................................................................................................................................................4 Service Location: ..................................................................................................................................4 Cost Proposal........................................................................................................................................4 3 | Page

COVER LETTER
AK Security Alarm LLC is pleased to submit an addendum to original contract from August 08, 2022, to extend existing services for the City of Lake Elsinore to include on-call services for the successor agency.

Our team of skilled professionals has extensive experience providing on-call services to a wide range of clients in the industry. AK Security Alarm LLC specializes in the design, installation, integration, and service of Security and fire alarm systems, and we also focus on Access Control systems and ClosedCircuit TV (CCTV) camera surveillance systems for residential and commercial applications.

AK Security Alarm LLC can provide you with a solution for your security system requirement, from a single-family home to larger estates or apartment complexes or small businesses to a larger industrial facility. We have a solution for your needs.

AK Security Alarm LLC works closely with partners all over our license areas. Through our partner operations, AK Security Alarm can reach out and help protect customers in locations that might otherwise be unavailable.

CORPORATE OFFICE INFORMATION:

AK Security Alarm LLC | Riverside
11521 Trailrun CT
Riverside, CA 92505
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 951-482-9526
http://aksecurityalarm.net
AK Security Alarm LLC is uniquely qualified to provide you with this Statement of Work to enhance the City's on-call services.

At AK Security Alarm LLC we take pride in providing high-quality services that meet the unique needs of our clients. Our team of professionals is experienced, knowledgeable, and skilled, which ensures that we deliver top-notch services every time. We also understand the importance of timeliness and will ensure that we respond promptly to all service requests.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal for on-call services for the successor agency. We are confident that we can provide the high-quality services you require at a competitive price. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or require further information.

Authorized Signers:

Oscar Gomez
Owner
[email protected]
https://aksecurityalarm.net
4 | Page

SCOPE OF WORK
Under this proposal, our company will provide on-call services to the successor agency, which will include but not be limited to, Lead Installer and Journeyman(s) Services as required.

The services will be provided on an as-needed basis, and the hourly rate defined in the cost section of this proposal.

ACTIVITIES
• On-Call Services for the Successor Agency
TERM
• 12 months
• Time and Material, billed as incurred
SERVICE LOCATION:
130 S Main St
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530

COST PROPOSAL
Our pricing model is competitive and transparent. We propose a markup on all parts and equipment of 15%.

By Expertise
Lead Technician $120/hr
Journeyman(s) $55/hr
5 | Page
AK Security Alarm, LLC.
11521 Trailrun Ct. Riverside, CA 92505
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 951-395-0006
License C10 #1005318 | ACO 7848

Page 1 of 2 ends

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Honorable Mayor or Members of the City Council
From: Jason Simpson, City Manager
Prepared by: Remon Habib, City Engineer
Date: April 25, 2023
Subject: Updated Master Drainage Plan and Fee Schedule
Recommendation
Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN AND FEE SCHEDULE.

Background
On September 14, 2021, City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates to update and finalize the Master Drainage Plan. This update will provide necessary Master Drainage Plan updates including a establishing a new Drainage Area Map and Fee Schedule and a GIS Drainage Map Interface.

Discussion
Albert A. Webb Associates updated the hydrology and hydraulic elements of the Master Drainage Plan and identified the critical flood control and drainage infrastructure improvements for the safe and orderly economic development of the community.

The Master Drainage Plan update focused on updating the Drainage Fee Schedule and redefining drainage areas. The Master Drainage Plan update consolidates 52 drainage areas to 5 drainage areas with associated updated drainage fees. The updated Drainage Area fees will increase to the recommended fee over three years. The update also provides an interactive GIS based Drainage Area Fee Map. In addition, the Master Drainage Plan update identified a list of 12 Capital Improvement Projects with estimated costs of $1.5 Million or less for the City to evaluate as funding becomes available.

The City of Lake Elsinore met with members of the Building Industry Association (BIA) of Southern California – The Riverside Chapter on January 10, 2023 and presented the proposed Master Drainage Plan and new area drainage fees.

Master Drainage Plan and Fee Schedule

Page 2 of 2 ends

The Updated Master Drainage Plan identifies the impacts of new development, the increased necessity for flood protection facilities and the required drainage mitigation projects. The drainage lines identified are necessary to mitigate flood risk from future development based on the benefit areas outlined in the Plan.

The proposed Fee Schedule is a financing mechanism used to offset taxpayer costs for new drainage facilities by calculating the cost of such facilities and spreading that cost among new development in each drainage area. The Updated Master Drainage Plan formulates an impact per gross acre as a result of future development. Because drainage is a function of watershed and rainfall date corresponding to the region, it is more appropriate to calculate the fee based on gross acreages rather than square footage and density of future structures. Fees based on the gross acreage of future development is more equitable as it is not functionally related to the size and density of development.

Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact to the City will result in revenue from area drainage fees according to the updated Master Drainage Plan and updated Area Drainage Fee Schedule below. Funds will be utilized for Drainage and Street Improvement projects carried out by the City or as reimbursement for qualified drainage projects carried out be developers and benefiting areas of the City beyond the project site as authorized by the City Engineer.

Attachments
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 - Updated Master Drainage Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN AND

FEE SCHEDULE
Whereas, the City of Lake Elsinore has established drainage fees for the Master Drainage plan by Resolution 91-63 on August 13, 1991;
Whereas, the City awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Albert A. Webb Associates on September 14, 2021 to update the City’s Master Drainage Plan and area drainage fees;
Whereas, the updated Master Drainage Plan reduces the number of benefit areas to five benefit areas, namely Alberhill Zone, Temescal Wash Zone, Lake Zone, East Lake Zone, and West Elsinore Zone aiming to simplify administration of area drainage fee; Whereas, the updated Master Drainage Plan identifies the impacts of new development, the increased necessity for flood protection facilities and the required drainage mitigation projects; Whereas, the updated Master Drainage Plan calculates the cost of such facilities and spreads that cost among new development in each drainage area based on the impact of future development per gross acre and proposes a new Drainage Fee Schedule based on the gross acreage of the future development;
Whereas, the City intends to utilize funding provided by the drainage fee for drainage and street improvement projects administered by the City and as reimbursement for developers where drainage facilities built by the project provide additional benefit beyond the project site as approved by the City Engineer;
Whereas, the City intends to implement the new area drainage fees recommended by the consultant over three (3) years in order to lessen impact to the development community; Whereas, the City of Lake Elsinore met with members of the Building Industry Association (BIA) of Southern California – The Riverside Chapter on January 10, 2023 and presented the updated Master Drainage Plan and new Drainage Fee Schedule; Whereas, the City of Lake Elsinore, will apply a 3.0% yearly area drainage fee increase effective March 1st, 2026 and on March 1st for every year thereafter; and Whereas, the drainage area fee required to be paid by a development project will be based on effective fee at the time payment is made to the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City hereby adopts the 2023 Master Drainage Plan and the updated fees per the following schedule:

CC Reso No. 2023-___

Page 2 of 3 ends

2 6
8 9
2 Benefit Area (Zone) Area Drainage Fee
per gross acre
Effective July 1st,
2023
Area Drainage Fee
per gross acre
Effective July 1st,
2024
Area Drainage Fee
per gross acre
Effective July 1st,
2025
Alberhill Zone $13,769 $21,295 $29,049
Temescal Wash
Zone
$7,561 $10,094 $12,703
Lake Zone $6,802 $8,233 $9,707
East Lake Zone $9,467 $14,171 $19,017
West Lake Zone $6,920 $9,149 $11,445
Section 2. The City Council makes the following findings:
(a) the Updated Master Drainage Plan identifies the impacts of new development, the increased necessity for flood protection facilities and required drainage mitigation projects; (b) the drainage lines identified are necessary to mitigate flood risk from future development based on the benefit areas outlined in the Updated Master Drainage Plan; (c) because drainage is a function of watershed and rainfall date corresponding to the region, it is more appropriate to calculate the fee based on gross acreages rather than square footage and density of future structures;
(d) drainage fees based on the gross acreage of future development are more equitable as they are not functionally related to the size and density of development; and (e) the updated Drainage Fee Schedule equitable spreads the cost of new facilities based on impacts per gross acre of future development.

Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and the updated Drainage Fees will become effective in accordance with the adopted schedule commencing July 1, 2023.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

Passed and Adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, this day of _____________ 20___.

Natasha Johnson
Mayor
Attest:

Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk
CC Reso No. 2023-___

Page 3 of 3 ends

2 6
8 9
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE )
I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2023-____ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the Regular meeting of ___________ __, 2023 and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN UPDATE
(CIP Project No. 120)
Prepared for:

Prepared by:

April 2022
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 1-1

Overview ___________________________________________________________________1-1 Existing MDPs and Drainage Infrastructure______________________________________1-2 Purpose ____________________________________________________________________1-3 Scope of Study ______________________________________________________________1-4 Design Criteria ______________________________________________________________1-5 SECTION 2 - EXISTING FACILITIES AND DRAINAGE ISSUES ................................ 2-9

Flooding and Drainage Issues _________________________________________________2-9 Drainage Issues - General Remedies__________________________________________2-12 Inventory of Existing Drainage Facilities________________________________________2-13 Field Investigation of Existing Drainage Inlet and Outlet __________________________2-15 SECTION 3 - HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS..................................................................... 3-18

Methodology _______________________________________________________________3-18 MDP Zone Delineation ______________________________________________________3-18 Sub-Drainage Area Delineation _______________________________________________3-20 Land Use & Specific Plans Consistency________________________________________3-20 Hydrologic Soil Group Map___________________________________________________3-22 Debris and Detention Basins _________________________________________________3-23 Flood Plain and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs)____________________________3-25 SECTION 4 - PROPOSED MDP FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVES........................ 4-28

Temescal Wash Zone _______________________________________________________4-28 Alberhill Sub-Zone __________________________________________________________4-35 Lake Zone _________________________________________________________________4-40 East Lake Zone_____________________________________________________________4-48 Existing West Elsinore MDP and ADP _________________________________________4-53 SECTION 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ..................................................... 5-54

Background________________________________________________________________5-54 Aesthetics _________________________________________________________________5-54 Air Quality _________________________________________________________________5-55 Biological Resources ________________________________________________________5-55 ii
Cultural Resources__________________________________________________________5-56 Geology and Soils __________________________________________________________5-58 Hydrology and Water Quality _________________________________________________5-58 Wetlands __________________________________________________________________5-59 Other Environmental Considerations __________________________________________5-60 References ________________________________________________________________5-61 SECTION 6 - COST SUMMARY AND FUNDING MECHANISMS.............................. 6-62

Cost Summary _____________________________________________________________6-62 ADP Fees _________________________________________________________________6-65 GIS Data Base _____________________________________________________________6-65 Additional Funding Sources __________________________________________________6-66 SECTION 7 - CONCULSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 7-70

Conclusions and Recommendations___________________________________________7-70 Future Growth of the City ____________________________________________________7-70 Limitations _________________________________________________________________7-71 iii

APPENDIX
APPENDIX A - Field Investigation Report
APPENDIX B – Exhibits
. Grid Map Index
. MDP Facility Grid Maps
. Existing Storm Drain Facilities
. Existing Caltrans Culverts
. Drainage Issue Areas
. Existing MDP Zone Overlay
. Soils Group Map
. City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Map
. MDP Consolidated Zoning Map
. Proposed MDP Zone Exhibit
. Proposed Debris Basins Exhibit
. MDP Zones with MSHCP Criteria Cells and Survey Areas
. MSP Zones with Paleontological Sensitivity
. MDP Zones with Wetlands and “Blue Line” Streams
iv
SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Strategically located off the I-15 freeway between the Inland Empire and San Diego, the City of Lake Elsinore is experiencing tremendous growth. With 70% remaining to build-out of its total 42 square miles, the City’s growth and development is expected to continue for the next few decades.

Recognizing the importance of having a well-planned infrastructure system to meet the demands of an expanding population, the City set the goal of updating its existing Master Drainage Plan (MDP) into a comprehensive document which will consolidate the existing 51 drainage districts, incorporate land areas annexed over the last 30 years, and update the existing Area Drainage Fee schedule. All future development in Lake Elsinore is subject to Area Drainage Fees under the auspices of Assembly Bill 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act.

Overview
Unique to the City is its namesake, Lake Elsinore, the Lake with the world famous thermal wind.

It is the resource, amenity, and primary attraction of the City, providing a wide range of sport and recreational opportunities for residents and visitors alike. “Dream Extreme” the City’s logo and branding slogan, attracts and promotes the sports of sky diving, parasailing, hang-gliding, water skiing, jet skiing, boat racing, fishing, off-road racing, and such.

The Lake also posts challenges and restrictions to the rapid growth of the City due to excessive levels of nitrogen and phosphorus (nutrient loading), sediment toxicity, and low water levels resulting from periodic drought conditions.

Lake Elsinore is at the terminus of the San Jacinto River, within the Santa Ana River watershed.

Lake Elsinore is the largest natural lake in Southern California. It has been in existence for thousands of years and has historically experienced significant variations in its water level. Today, the lake receives surface flows from local tributaries, water releases from Canyon Lake, and recycled water from Elsinore Valley Water District. During rare overflow events, at approximately 1,255 feet water surface elevation (Datum NGVD 1929, Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel designed by U.S. Army Engineer District Los Angeles, Corps of Engineers), Lake Elsinore overflows into Temescal Creek and ultimately to the Santa Ana River.
1-1
The City of Lake Elsinore is located approximately 60 miles southeast of Los Angeles and 70 miles north of San Diego, in western Riverside County. The City is bounded by Cities of Canyon Lake, Menifee and Wildomar to the east, unincorporated areas of Riverside County to the north, south and west as it lies nestled at the foot of the Cleveland National Forest. Figure 1-1 shows the general vicinity of the City.

The city terrain ranges in elevation from 1,250 feet at the Lake to a maximum of 2,400 feet above sea level at southwest corner of the City within the Santa Ana Mountain range.

Figure 1-1
City of Lake Elsinore General Vicinity Map
Existing MDPs and Drainage Infrastructure
The existing city wide Master Drainage Plan (MDP) and Area Drainage Fee (ADF) was approved and adopted by the City in 1990. This master drainage plan divided the City into 54 drainage districts with drainage fees assigned for 51 of the 54 districts. The fee schedule associated with the 1990 MDP was updated by Harris and Associates in 2004, the 2004 updated MDP used the same hydrology analysis to size the facilities in the 1990 MDP and incorporated much of the same information from the 1990 MDP.

Within the city boundary and its sphere of influence, there are three MDPs and one Area Drainage Plan (ADP) prepared and adopted by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District). Figure 1-2 depicts the boundaries of these three MDPs.

1. “West Elsinore Master Drainage Plan” and “West Elsinore Area Drainage Plan” were prepared by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), with the Area Drainage Fee approved in 1986 and updated in June 12, 1993. The drainage area covered by this MDP consists of approximately 10.5 square miles, where nearly 40% of the drainage area is within the City boundary. Currently, most of the MDP facilities are constructed, and areas are well developed, except the steep hillside area. 1-2
Figure 1-2
City of Lake Elsinore Existing MDP Exhibit

2. “SEDCO Master Drainage Plan” was prepared by the District in March, 1982. The drainage area covered by SEDCO MDP consists of approximately 4.5 square miles, mostly outside the City boundary. However, all SEDCO storm water runoffs discharge to the Lake through the East Lake area of the City. The SEDCO area and area to the east were incorporated in 2009 as the City of Wildomar. The City of Wildomar is also in the process of preparing a city-wide Master Drainage Plan.

3. “Lakeland Village Master Drainage Plan” was prepared by the District and adopted in March 2015. This MDP study area encompasses approximately 13 square miles, located south of the Lake, within unincorporated Riverside County. A limited area of the City is located within this MDP. Since this is one of the latest MDPs prepared by the District, it is also used as reference for this report.

The above listed three Master Drainage Plans depict three stand-alone watersheds, with runoff originating from these watersheds flowing into Lake Elsinore. The general areas within these MDP boundaries are excluded for this study.

Purpose
The primary purpose of updating the Master Drainage Plan (MDP) is to provide a comprehensive storm water strategy that provides flood protection for both existing and future developments within the City.

The MDP will also: identify the drainage facilities to address the major drainage problems within the City; establish the estimated costs of those facilities, and identify the funding sources for the city-wide flood control and drainage infrastructure, to facilitate safe, orderly and economically development of the area. In addition, this study will also explore the opportunity for implementing watershed-based BMPs, and water quality mitigation and treatment with the focus on nutrient 1-3
reduction, to enhance the beneficial use of, and minimize the negative impact to the Lake water quality from current and future development.

This MDP update study addresses the current and future drainage needs of the communities within the City. The boundary of each drainage zone follows regional watershed limits. The proposed facilities include channels, storm drains, debris and detention basins, and any other conveyance capable of economically relieving flooding problems within the City. The plan includes an estimate of facility capacity, sizes and costs.

In addition to providing a guide for the orderly development of the City, the MDP update also provides an estimate of costs to resolve flooding issues within each drainage zone or sub-zone.

Those costs will be used to establish Area Drainage Fees exacted under AB 1600, which prevent existing taxpayers from having to shoulder the burden of land development costs.

The alignment and location of the facilities proposed in this MDP update are conceptual. Precise locations and size of the facility will be dictated by site specific conditions and other factors such as environmental, engineering and economic considerations.

Scope of Study
The updated MDP study consolidates the drainage districts, assesses and inventories the existing drainage infrastructures, incorporates updated city boundary, general plan land use, and rainfall data, and produces a comprehensive master drainage plan for the entire city. The drainage fee schedule will correspond to the consolidated drainage zones. West Elsinore ADP fees will be adjusted using the published construction cost price index value by Engineering News Record, widely known as ENR.

In conjunction with this study, GIS data layers have been developed for MDP facilities, drainage zone boundaries, and the area drainage fee schedule to integrate into the City GIS data base.

The overall scope of the MDP update included the following:
o Existing drainage facility data collection and field investigation of the flooded areas and conditions of inlets and outlets of major storm drains
o Establishing basic engineering design criteria and consolidating existing 51-Drainage Districts to 4-MDP Zones for drainage and flood control within the City o Compiling existing available topography and land use plans for the project area o Preparing hydrology analysis for the study area of the City and its tributary areas o Identifying proposed drainage improvements for each MDP zone or sub-zone o Investigation of alternatives for the proposed drainage facilities and cost estimates o Finalizing MDP facility and Area Drainage Fee for each zone or subzone 1-4
Design Criteria
It is imperative to establish the criteria for the Hydrology and Hydraulics (H&H) study and MDP design guideline before proceeding with the detailed studies and design. Webb has reviewed the existing MDPs within or near the city boundary prepared by Riverside County Flood Control District (District) to ensure the City of Lake Elsinore MDP will be compatible and consistent with the surrounding areas. The following criteria were discussed with the Interim City Engineer, and were reviewed and approved by the City.

1. Hydrology
The hydrology for this MDP will be developed using two methods: the Rational Method and the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method. The Rational Method will be used to determine the peak discharges (cubic feet per second) generated from watersheds smaller than 300 to 500 acres in size. For watersheds larger than 300 to 500 acres, primarily the watersheds outside the city boundary and steep hilly areas, the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method will be used. Methodology and supportive data for both Rational and Synthetic hydrology, including estimation of loss rates/infiltration, may be found in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual, dated April 1978 (District Hydrology Manual).

2. Land Use
In 2011, the City completed an update of its General Plan. For the watershed areas within the city boundary, land use designations from the updated General Plan will be used to develop the hydrology for this MDP.

For the watershed areas outside the city boundary, the 2003 Riverside County General Plan land use designations will be used.

In addition to the City and County General Plan land use, there are 17 Specific Plans within the city, and each has its own land use designations. Some of these Specific Plans are almost builtout, while others are still evolving and going through amendments.

Due to the dynamic and complex nature of the land use designations and their actual impacts to the hydrology studies, we propose to consolidate the land use into 7 categories with assigned impervious percentage recommended per the District Hydrology Manual. For Specific Plans, if there are 10 planning areas with varied density, an average total may be used for MDP level of the studies. This approach will simplify the process without compromising the integrity of the study.
1-5
City of Lake Elsinore MDP Land Use Summary
Land Use
Group
RCFCD Hyd Manual Impervious Land Use per General Plan Remarks Cover Type Cover Open
Space
OS-Open Space, F-Floodway, Conservation Natural (Fair) 5% Lakeland Village MDP used (Good)
cover for the
same land use
group.

Bank, RMR-Rural Mountainous
Residential, RR-Rural Residential
Chaparral
Broadleaf
Park &
Rec
Park, L-Lakeshore, R-Recreation, Golf
Course
Urban Landscaping
1 Acre Lots
15%
30%
40%
VLDR Very Low Density Residential, Estate
Density Residential
LDR PI-Public Institutional, Schools, LDR-Low
Density Residential
1/2 Acre Lots Use >40% based
on actual
impervious cover
MDR
HDR
R1-Single Family Residential, R2-Medium
Density Residential, LMD-Low Medium
Density Residential, MD-Medium Density
Residential, MHD-Medium High Density
Residential
1/4 Acre Lots 50%
High Density Residential, RMU-Residential Condo,
Mixed Use, MC-Mobile Home community, Apartments,
EC-Existing Condo, EMH-Existing Mobile
Home Complex
75%
90%
Mobile Home Park
Commer- Varies Commercial C1, C2, CM, CO, CP, CR, Commercial, cial NC, TC, GC, Manufacturing M1, M2, M3,
BP-Business Professional, LI-Light
Industrial
Downtown
Business or
Industrial

3. Rainfall Values
To be consistent with the recently completed Lakeland Village MDP prepared by the District, the NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall data will be used in the hydrology calculations for this MDP. The rainfall frequencies examined are the 2-year (50% annual chance) and the 100-year (1% annual chance) recurrence intervals with 1, 3, 6 and 24 hour durations. The calculated slope of the intensityduration curve is 0.6. The following NOAA Atlas 14 Version 4 average point rainfall values will be used to develop the hydrology:
1-6
NOAA Atlas 14 Point Rainfall Values
Storm Frequency and Duration Average Point Rainfall (Inches) 2 Year – 1 Hour 0.48
2 Year – 3 Hour 0.86

1.24 2.34

1.34 2.17

3.06 6.29
2 Year – 6 Hour
2 Year – 24 Hour
100 Year – 1 Hour
100 Year – 3 Hour
100 Year – 6 Hour
100 Year – 24 Hour

4. MDP Facilities
Currently, the existing storm drain facilities within the city limits are maintained by various entities and agencies; including RCFCD, Caltrans, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Wildomar, County of Riverside Transportation Department, HOAs and others. To streamline the future design, maintenance, and funding, the City may consider establishing some guidelines and maintenance mechanisms (CFDs or Assessment Districts) and the discussion of those is included in the MDP documents. Each maintenance entity also dictates the design standards. For the purpose of MDP facility design and cost estimate, RCFCD standards and design guidelines will be used.

Underground Storm Drain System
All of the underground storm drain systems will be designed to convey the runoff from a 100-year storm, with RCP sized 36” and larger. Road culverts, laterals and collectors will not be identified as MDP facilities. The underground facilities proposed in this MDP will be located within existing or assumed future right-of-way, whenever possible. The typical MDP storm drain pipe or box design will have 3’ of cover with the slopes parallel to the existing ground.

Open Channels
Well defined natural channels, canyons and ravines are the most economical way to transport and convey the storm runoff, and pose the least impacts to potentially sensitive areas. The MDP study will focus on preserving and maximizing the utilization of natural water courses.

When natural water courses become less defined, flattened and spread out, they may cause flooding of the roadway and properties, as well as add constrains to future development. Open channels may be used to continue transporting storm runoff to a safe outlet. The open channels not only serve as flow conveyors, they also provide an outlet for underground facilities. This MDP study will utilize two types of open channels, lined and unlined. Lined channels will be used in high velocity flow situations and are typically rectangular or trapezoidal shaped with concrete paving on the sides and bottom. Unlined channels will be utilized in low velocity flow situations, are typically trapezoidal in shape and have no protection for the bottom or side slopes. The 1-7
unlined channels can also provide infiltration or filtration opportunities for water quality management.

The channel right-of-way required for both lined and unlined facilities must accommodate the full channel width along with adequate maintenance access. Channels with top widths less than 20 feet require one maintenance access road, and where the top width exceeds 20 feet, two maintenance access roads are necessary per RCFCD design standards. All of the open channels will be designed to convey the runoff from a 100-year storm.

Detention Basin
Detention basins maybe utilized for this MDP. The purpose of the detention basin is to lower the peak flow rate through the use of temporary detention storage, thus reducing the size and cost of the downstream MDP facilities. It should be noted that a detention basin, if proposed, will be sized for the 1% annual chance ("100-year" storm) event. Flows exceeding the design capacity of the basin would pass over the emergency spillway or overflow structure, discharge into the downstream storm drain pipe or open channel. A detention basin may also be used when existing downstream facilities have inadequate capacity.

Debris Basins
Debris basins may be used in watersheds that are equal to or greater than 64 acres and are generally located upstream of the proposed facilities to capture debris before it enters the downstream conveyance system. The proposed debris basins will be sized based on the Los Angeles District Method for Prediction of Debris Yield (Method) developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, dated February 2000. The Method is intended to be used for the estimation of debris yield in watersheds of 64 to 128,000 acres in areas with steep, mountainous terrain. The MDP study will further evaluate the benefits of reducing sedimentation and debris, reducing facility size (without using bulked flowrate) and ease of maintenance versus the cost of land acquisition and cost of construction of the debris basins.

Recharge Basins
An evaluation for use of recharge basins was made as part of the MDP. Due to the highest and best use assigned to runoff to the Lake and the basin size required to be cost effective, locations were not selected at this time. Recharge Basins can and will be considered as construction of MDP facilities occurs.
1-8
SECTION 2 - EXISTING FACILITIES AND DRAINAGE ISSUES
Drainage issues include street and private property flooding, erosion, long-term ponding, drainage facility maintenance issues, and hillside runoff. The drainage facilities include City-owned storm drains and channels, Riverside County Flood Control District-owned and maintained storm drains and channels, homeowner association-owned basins, and the inlets and outlets associated with each. The field surveys and documentation provided in this report were collected from January to March 2015.

Most of the drainage issue locations and drainage facility locations were identified by City staff prior to the field surveys. The drainage issue locations were collected by City maintenance and engineering staff based on past resident complaints and prior knowledge and experience in the area. The type and location of various existing storm drain facilities are based on as-built plans in the City’s possession. The locations were input into an electronic map using GIS software to keep collected information geo-referenced and easily accessible. During the field surveys, all notes and pictures were collected using the ArcGIS Collector mobile application. This application operates on any mobile phone or data-enabled tablet and uploads information to the GIS map in real-time.

All of the field surveys were conducted by at least one engineering staff member from Albert A.

Webb Associates (Webb) along with at least one engineering staff member from the City.

Flooding and Drainage Issues
With the assistance of the City Maintenance and Operation staffs, Webb surveyed and documented approximately 79 drainage issue locations. These locations are characterized by any combination of street flooding, private property flooding, dirt or roadway erosion, long-term ponding, hillside runoff, and maintenance issues. Nearly all of the drainage issue locations are located between Interstate 15 and the northeast side of the lake. The northeast side of the City is largely an older area with few to no existing storm drain facilities. There are also several steep slopes in the area that seem to exacerbate the flooding and runoff problems.

Below are the top ten flooding locations in the City provided by the city staff:

1. 1209 N. Sumner

2. 3rd Street / Pasadena

3. Avenue 6 / Lakeshore

4. Pepper / Dawes

5. Mission Trail south of Olive.

6. High St / Alley e/o Lakeshore

7. East side of Lakeshore from Morton to 100 feet past Lake Park Street

8. Lakeshore / Kansas on north side of Lakeshore

9. W/S Machado s/o Joy St by guard rail

10. Franklin by Cell Tower
Figure 2-1 shows the locations of observed drainage issues throughout the City.

A summary table with the locations of the City wide drainage issues and recommended mitigation measures are provided at the end of this section.
2-9
Figure 2-1
City of Lake Elsinore Drainage Issue Locations
o Street Flooding. Street flooding in the City is primarily caused by low points in or near the street without proper drainage facilities. Although the climate is relatively arid, water often remains in the street for days and even weeks after a rain event. This is especially true on gravel roads and on streets with low points in or near dirt shoulders.

Roadway flooding on Collier Ave. near Chaney Street Roadway flooding on Lakeshore Drive at Matich Street 2-10
o Private Property Flooding. Private property flooding and water damage in the City mainly occurs near hills and in areas of low elevations. Water often flows down hills or streets and runs through or ponds in private property. This kind of flooding usually occurs when property is at lower elevations than the street or when the street is lacking curbs or berms to properly channelize the water. Often gravel bags were placed along the street edge of pavement or property line by the City M&O staff to reduce the flooding.

Street flow on Ellis Street drains down slope into property at Lower elevation
Sand bags at Country Club Dr. and Acacia Street
o Erosion. Street shoulder erosion is most commonly found on streets with no curb or berm to properly channelize water. Storm runoff flows in the dirt at the edge of the street creating ravines. The runoff can get underneath the street and cause pavement damage. Erosion is also found wherever an undeveloped hillside meets a street. Dirt and debris from the hill are carried by the water and are deposited on downstream streets and property.

Dirt shoulder erosion adjacent to pavement on Franklin Street Hillside erosion o Maintenance Issues. There are many locations that the City’s maintenance staff handles on a regular basis. The staff places sandbags in runoff areas near hills, vacuums problematic ponding areas, and clears runoff debris from streets and blocked storm drains.

Maintenance of drainage areas is constant. Storm drains are routinely blocked after a rain event with heavy deposits of dirt and debris.

Storm drain outlets blocked with dirt on Pierce and Collier Avenue 2-11
Drainage Issues - General Remedies
Most of the drainage issues occur from only a few causes. The most common causes of the surveyed drainage issues are low points on the street or property, lack of curbs and/or gutter facilities, unimproved hillside, and insufficient maintenance of existing facilities.

Street flooding is often caused by streets not having proper slopes and crowns, and lack of dewatering measures at low points. Some streets in the City were found to have low points within the traveled way. The slopes of the pavement can be improved by paving, but care should be taken to not simply put the water on the shoulder of the road. Water can often pond or erode dirt shoulders if not properly channelized.

Constructing berms, curbs, and gutters can help channelize the water along the street and towards storm drain facilities.

There are many vacant and unimproved lots and areas throughout the City imbedded in the older neighborhood, and often leave gaps in curbs, gutters and sidewalks. The storm runoff from these lots often brings dirt and debris to the street and causes erosion and blocks the street flow. The City has been placing sandbags to keep the storm runoff flowing within the street, as a temporary solution. More permanent solutions such as berms, curbs, and gutters can be added to the frontage of these lots to assist in drainage. Also, the addition and preservation of vegetation and other plants can reduce the amount of water runoff and dirt erosion from these areas. A special assessment fee or NPDES requirements for the vacant lots may be considered for funding of the maintenance.

It is clear that the majority locations with flooding and drainage issues are in older neighborhoods of the City, areas with very few to no existing storm drain facilities. A few areas with the erosion and flooding issues can be addressed by installing asphalt berm or concrete curb and gutter along the existing edge of pavement, a low cost solution. For the majority of the areas with flooding issues, the long term solution is to establish a system of drainage facilities to safely convey storm runoff to the Lake or other receiving water.
2-12
Inventory of Existing Drainage Facilities
The existing storm drain facilities within the City boundary and MDP study area can be separated to three major categories based on the maintenance responsibility:

Figure 2-2
City of Lake Elsinore Existing Drainage Facilities

1. City and privately owned and maintained facilities – the City completed a City-wide GIS mapping in July of 2013. The City facilities range from underground pipe systems and concrete lined channels, to culverts and basins. Some of the water quality basins and detention basins may be maintained by the HOAs or POAs. Some of the facilities shown on the City GIS map database may be duplications of the District’s facilities (in the West Elsinore MDP area).

2. The District (RCFCD) owned and maintained facilities – The MDP study area is located in the District’s Zone 3. There are 47 sets of “As Built” RCFCD storm drain plans collected and reviewed for this study. These “As Built” plans dated as early as 1954, the latest addition is Arroyo Del Toro Channel plans dated 2013. Among the District facilities, Outlet Channel is a unique facility designed by the Army Corp of Engineers. With its crest (high point) located at mid Wasson Canyon Channel inlet, it conveys half of the Wasson Canyon runoff to the Lake in normal storm events. It also discharges Lake’s overflow to the Temescal Wash when 1255 water surface elevation is reached in the Lake. A summary of the District’s facilities is provided hereon for reference.
2-13
Existing RCFCD Facilities
No. Project No. Dwg No. Facility Name Reach
Lake to Grand Ave.

Type
1 3-0-00010 3-063 U Channel
3-0-00008 3-068
3-0-00100 3-070
3-0-00030 3-078
3-0-00030 3-078
3-0-00060 3-079
3-0-00030 3-085
3-0-00060 3-092
3-0-00090 3-093
3-0-00090 3-100
3-0-00070 3-102
3-0-00100 3-106
3-0-00100 3-109
3-0-00120 3-110
3-0-00100 3-112
3-0-00120 3-116
3-0-00140 3-119
3-0-00175 3-126
3-0-00180 3-127
3-0-00149 3-128
3-0-00070 3-129
3-0-00070 3-130
3-0-00040 3-131
3-0-00071 3-133
3-0-00005 3-135
3-0-00004 3-135R
3-0-00216 3-141
3-0-00148 3-142
3-0-00071 3-143
3-0-00220 3-146
3-0-00100 3-147
3-0-00100 3-149
3-0-00100 3-158
3-0-00226 3-159
3-0-00004 3-162
3-0-00071 3-171
3-0-00120 3-178
3-0-00220 3-179
3-0-00145 3-180
3-0-00220 3-185
3-0-00045 3-186
3-0-00085 3-187
3-0-00085 3-190
3-0-00141 3-191
3-0-00040 3-194
3-0-00086 3-195
3-0-00170 3-196
Lakeland Village Storm Drain
2 Churchill Street Ditch Turnaround to Grand Ditch
3 Leach Canyon Debris Dam
Lime St. Channel Stage I & II
Lime St. Channel Stage I & II
Stoneman St. Channel
Right of Way Map, Debris Dam
Hill Street
Dam
4 Trap Channel
5 Lake to Laguna Ave Trap
6 Stoneman at Grand Trap
7 Lime St. Channel Stage III
Stoneman St. Channel Stage II
South riverside Channel Stage I
South riverside Channel Stage II
Ortega Channel Stage I
Laguna to Grandview Trap
8 Stoneman St Channel
9 Lake Elsinore to Laguna Ave. Trap
Washington to Dreycott on Laguna
Lake to Grand Ave.
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
RCP
Trap
Leach Canyon Channel Stage I
Leach Canyon Channel Stage II
Four Corners Storm Drain Stage I
Leach Canyon Channel Stage I
Four Corners Storm Drain Stage III
SEDCO Line D & D-1
Lake 3+40 to 33+50 Conc. Trap
Conc. Channel
RCP
Machado to Riverside
Lake to Riverside Dr.

Restoration Conc Channel
On Lakeshore Dr. to Gunnerson RCP
Mission Trail to I-15 RCP
Third Street Channel Thrid St and Collier Ave Trap, RCB Basin, RCP, channel
U Channel, 60" RCP
RCP
Wasson Canyon Channel Stage I
SEDCO Line F-2
Minthorn Street and Collier Ave
Along Tract 23235 boundary
Ortega Channel Stage II-A Grand to Ortega Hwy
Ortega Channel Stage III Tr 19358 Channel & RCP
RCP or CIPP
RCP
SEDCO Line F-3 North of Strickland Av to South of Collier Ave Ortega Channel Laterals A & A1 Tract 20139-1
Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel
Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel-Rt 74
W Elsinore MDP Line A-1
SEDCO Line F-4
Sheets R1-R50 Mics, Waterline relocations
Channel Bridge -Caltrans Riverside Dr
Tr 28748 & 28748-1 / Stage 1 on Grand Ave
Tr 23295 - Gafford Road & Winding Way
On Grandview and Lakeridge
Tr 30789 Stage 2, Sandpiper Drive
CFD 88-3, Line B, Stage 3 & Line B-1, Stage 1
CFD 88-3, McVicker Channel Line B-1, Stage 2
CFD 88-3, Line B-1, Stage 3
CFD 88-3 Debris Basin, Line B-1 Stage 4
Lake Elsinore to Temescal Creek
Welford Place
Bridge
RCP
RCP, Channel
Ortega Channel Stage II RCP
W Elsinore MDP Line C RCP
Leach Canyon Channel Trap Channel
Trap Channel
Channel, RCP
Basin, Channel
Trap Channel
Basin
Leach Canyon Channel
Leach Canyon Channel
W Elsinore MDP McVicker Debris Basin
Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel-USACE
Ortega Channel Lat-A Debris Basin
Four Corners Storm Drain
W Elsinore MDP Line C & C1
SEDCO Line E
Stage 4, Lakeshore Drive RCP
Tract 30789, Line C Stage 2
Park Access to Mission Trail
Tract 31917, Line C Stage 3
Channel Bridge -Caltrans Riverside Dr
Stage 1 From Collier Marsh to I-15
Tract 29513
RCP, Basin
RCP, Channel
RCP, Basin
Channel & RCB
RCP
W Elsinore MDP Line C & C1
Palomar and Corydon Channel
SEDCO Bryant St Storm Drain
SEDCO Bryant St Storm Drain
SEDCO Line F
RCP, Basin
60" 72"-RCP
Pond
Stage 2, from Elsinore HS to I-15
Gunnerson Pond Restoration, landscape
Tract 31345
Gunnerson Pond - USACE
SEDCO Beech Dr. Storm Drain
Arroyo Del Toro Channel
RCP, Basin
Stage 1 From Collier Marsh to I-15 RCB & U-Channel
2-14

3. Caltrans facilities – Integrated with the construction of I-15 Freeway in 1980, many drainage culverts were constructed within the State R/W, to allow the storm runoff crossing under I-15 along the existing drainage courses as well as provide for de-watering of the highway. The “As Built” storm drain plans were obtained from Caltrans and examined. The drainage facilities shown on the “As Built” plans were compiled and depicted on the Existing Drainage Facilities shown on Figure 2-2 and Caltrans Culverts on Figure 2-3. These culverts are maintained by Caltrans. Typically, neither culvert design capacity nor hydraulics data are depicted on the “as built” plans. For any extension, connection or modifications of these culverts, a Caltrans encroachment permit will need to be obtained.

Figure 2-3
Existing Caltrans Culverts
Field Investigation of Existing Drainage Inlet and Outlet A survey of the documented existing storm drain inlets and outlets larger than 36” in diameter was conducted. Some of the inlets and outlets surveyed had various degrees of blockage due to sediment, debris, foliage, or a combination of the three. An effort should be made to clear all of the blocked inlets and outlets. In addition, regularly scheduled maintenance of the facilities is required in order to keep the facilities operating as intended.

With the assistance of the City O & M staff, Webb surveyed and documented approximately 109 inlet or outlet locations throughout the City to verify size, location, and condition of each. Included 2-15
in the survey are large culverts, weirs, inlets and outlets in basins, and storm drain channels.

Regarding inlets and outlets, Webb only surveyed pipes 36” inches in diameter or larger to limit the field review to MDP mainlines and large pipes. The inlets and outlets were found throughout the developed areas of the City. Figure 2-4 shows the locations of surveyed inlets and outlets within the City.

Figure 2-4
City of Lake Elsinore Storm Drain Inlet and Outlet Locations The existing drainage facilities include City-owned storm drains and channels; Riverside County Flood Control District-owned underground storm drains, open channels and debris basins; homeowner or property owner association-owned and maintained basins, and the inlets and outlets associated with each. An in depth, detailed Field Investigation Report is provided in Appendix A of this report.

Outlet Headwall in the Links at Summerly Golf Course Box Culvert under Collier Avenue 2-16
Based on the field survey and observation, we recommend that the following measures be considered for drainage facility maintenance:
• Establish an annual major drainage facility clean up schedule, preferably completed before the starting of the rainy season, once a year minimum Allocate funding and manpower for major cleanup and debris removal Organize local communities, volunteer groups, and school districts to participate in the cleanup
•
•
•
•
•
Combine the cleanup with public outreach and public education for “Keep Our Lake Clean”, “Only Rain in the Lake” and such
Keep a record of sediment and debris removal load and frequency at the major inlets and outlets
Identify the sources and evaluate any additional measures which can be implemented to reduce the sediment and debris load
2-17
SECTION 3 - HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
Methodology
The hydrologic analysis for the study area was performed using methodology consistent with the guidelines in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual. The Modified Rational Method and Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method were used to establish the peak discharge rates. The methodology for the hydrologic analysis is also discussed in Design Criteria of SECTION 1 of this report, and approved by the Interim City Engineer prior to commencing the hydrology study.

MDP Zone Delineation
Based on the initial data collection, analysis, regional drainage boundaries from the prior master drainage plans prepared by the District and input from the City, the following parameters for the MDP update and zone delineation were established:
o East Lake area is a special development focus zone of the City, with the continuation of East Lake Specific Plan Amendments, and priority set by the City, this area shall have an independent study.
o Sedco area is outside the City boundary with an existing District MDP, its runoff drains into the Lake through the East Lake area. The City of Wildomar is currently preparing a city-wide MDP, which incorporates the Sedco area. The results of Wildomar’s MDP study data is be utilized for the East Lake drainage design.
o West Elsinore area is guided by the District’s West Elsinore MDP, and its drainage facilities are 80 to 90% constructed. No new study is required.
o The District completed and adopted Lakeland Village MDP in March, 2015. Lakeland Village area will be excluded from this study.
o The areas outside the City limit will not be studied unless the areas are in the watersheds directly draining into the City.

Webb also reviewed and examined the existing MDP Map and fee schedule. Fourteen (14) of the total 51 MDP districts are either completely or mostly outside the City boundary; the City has no jurisdiction to collect Area Drainage Fees from these unincorporated areas or within the City of Wildomar.

In addition to the above-listed considerations, we established three proposed MDP Zones under the direction of the City Engineer. The division of the new zones is primarily based on the receiving water. The storm runoffs from the East Lake and the Lake Zone are directly discharged into the Lake, as is the runoff from existing West Elsinore MDP and Lakeland Village MDP. Temescal Wash is the receiving water for the Temescal Wash Zone.

The overlay of the existing MDP Map and Proposed MDP Zones is shown on Figure 3-1 below.

The proposed MDP Exhibit is shown on Figure 3-2.
3-18
Figure 3-1
Existing City MDP Map Overlay
Figure 3-2
Proposed MDP Zones
3-19
Sub-Drainage Area Delineation
The delineation of the sub-drainage area is based on the natural flow patterns, ridge lines, developed conditions and available data for the proposed developments.

For the areas outside any filed Specific Plans and Tentative Maps, natural drainage patterns were used for hydrology study.

For the existing master planned communities, such as Canyon Hills, Tuscany Hills, Canyon Creek, La Laguna Estates, etc. no additional studies are performed since the drainage facilities in these communities are either fully or partially build out.

For the areas within the Tentative Tract Map or Specific Plan Studies, the proposed storm drain facilities are obtained from the design engineer when available, and incorporated in the MDP accordingly.

Land Use & Specific Plans Consistency
As established in Design Criteria of Section 1 of this report, the General Plan Land Use needs to be consolidated and reclassified based on the imperviousness for hydrology study.

Figure 3-3
2012 General Plan Land Use Map
3-20
Within the city boundary there are 17 adopted Specific Plans. Land uses for these Specific Plans were not depicted on the Land Use Map as shown in Figure 3-3. Some of the Approved Specific Plans have been amended many times. East Lake Specific Plan has been amended 10 times, and is in the process of additional modifications.

It is anticipated that the future development trend, market demand, and environmental regulations will result in many additional amendments. New Specific Plans will also bring changes in land use. It is understood that the city-wide land use map is a dynamic, ever changing document. For the hydrology study, the exactness of the land use is less prevalent than imperviousness derived from the land use.

Webb compiled a comprehensive land use map to cover the MDP study areas (see Figure 3-4).

The land uses from following Specific Plans were reviewed and incorporated in this overall land use map.

City of Lake Elsinore Specific Plan Summary
Location Specific Plan Name
Alberhill Ranch
Amd No Date MDP Receiving Water
Temescal Wash
Proposed MDP Zone Stage
Undev
to Lake
#3 1997 NW Alberhill Sub-Zone
Alberhill Sub-Zone
Lake
Murdock Alberhill Ranch #2
#3
2008
2005
NW
NE
Temescal Wash
San Jacinto River
Phase 1 Dev
Canyon Creek (La Strada) N Undev
Canyon Creek (La Strada) S
Canyon Hills (cottonwood
Hills)
#3
#3
2005
2009
NE San Jacinto River
San Jacinto River
Lake
Lake
In Construction
East Partial Dev
Canyon (Hills) Estates
Cape of Good Hope
Cottage Lane
2006
1993
2005
2010
2013
East
NW
San Jacinto River Lake Undev
Lake / Temescal Wash Temescal Wash Undev
West
East
East
Lake
Lake
Lake
West Elsinore MDP Partial Dev
Diamond #1 East Lake
East Lake
Partial Dev
East Lake #10 Partial Dev
Elsinore City Center
Lake Elsinore Outlet Center
Lakeshore Village
La Laguna Estates
North Peak
2001
2000
2003
2003
1999
East San Jacinto River
Temescal Wash
Lake
Lake Complete
#3 North
West
West
North
Temescal Wash Mostly Develop
West Elsinore MDP Mostly Develop
#1 West Elsinore MDP Complete
#2
Lake
Lake / Temescal Wash Lake / Temescal
Wash
Undev
Ramsgate #6 2008 North Lake / Temescal Wash Lake / Temescal Wash
Partial Dev
Spyglass Ranch 2008 Undev
2006
1990
North
West
NE
Lake Lake
The Village at Lakeshore
Tuscany Hills
Lake West Elsinore MDP Undev
#1 San Jacinto River/
Canyon Lake
Lake / Temescal Wash
Lake South side Dev
Terracina 2014
2015
NW
NW
Lake / Temescal
Wash
In Review
Alberhill Villages Temescal Wash Alberhill Sub-Zone In Review 3-21
Figure 3-4
Land Use Map for Hydrology Study
Hydrologic Soil Group Map
Another major factor affecting infiltration and peak storm runoff is the nature of the soil. Soil types for this study were taken from the hydrologic soils classification maps in the Hydrology Manual of the District. An overall hydrologic soil group map is compiled for the study areas as shown in Figure 3-5.

The four main hydrologic soils groups developed by the Soil Conservation Service of the U. S.

Department of Agriculture were utilized by the District to classify soils types. Soils Group A has low runoff potential and high infiltration rates with mostly sandy soils. On the other end of the spectrum, Soils Group D has high runoff potential, very slow infiltration rates, consists of mostly clay soils and is nearly impervious. As shown in Figure 3-5, the majority of the study areas consist of Groups C and D soils. Generally speaking these types of soils are not suitable for infiltration and ground water recharging.
3-22
Figure 3-5
Hydrologic Soil Groups Map
Debris and Detention Basins
Debris Basins
The estimation of debris yield from an erosive upland watershed is an important factor in the design and maintenance of debris basin and flood control projects. Nine debris basins have been proposed to capture sediment and debris before it enters the proposed storm drain facilities (see Figure 3-6 Proposed Debris Basins). The 100-year single event debris yield estimates were determined at the canyon mouths of Subareas A1 and A2, A4-2, A6, A7-1, A10, A11, A4-2, and A5-1 using the LADCOE Debris Method. The delineation of these subareas is also shown on Figure 3-6.

Sediment production from a watershed is a function of several variables. The most evident variables are vegetative cover, rainfall intensity, slopes of the watershed, geology, soil type, and size of the drainage area. Fire greatly increases the amount of runoff and erosion from a mountain watershed caused by lack of vegetation and lowered infiltration rates. The inclusion of sediment in runoff results in a greater total discharge which is referred to as bulking. Sediment discharge from a major storm can be equal to the actual storm runoff, that is, runoff bulked 100 percent. If debris basins were not proposed for these areas, the downstream facilities would need to be sized 3-23
for the bulked flows and routinely maintained (cleanout) to ensure that the design capacity is conveyed at all times. Due to the enclosed nature of the underground storm drains and difficulty in removing the sediments, the sediment removal costs would be far more costly than debris basin cleanout costs.

Figure 3-6
Proposed Debris Basins
Flood history in Southern California clearly demonstrates the debris yield hazard as one associated with singular storm events, and has shown that over 80% of the annual volume of sediment comes from a single storm event. Therefore, the debris basins proposed in this MDP are designed for a single event as opposed to a long term (average annual) volume basin.

Because the proposed structures are sized to only intercept debris from a single flood event (100- year frequency), the captured debris would need to be removed from the basins to ensure adequate storage capacity for subsequent storm events.

The proposed debris basins were sized based on the Los Angeles District Method for Prediction of Debris Yield by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District (LADCOE), dated February 2000. The Method provides a systematic approach for determining the debris yield from a single flood event to be used in the debris basin design sizing. Debris basins were sized for the 100-year event storm using the 100-year 1-hour rainfall data. Due to the lack of site specific data, the most conservative fire factor (FF) of 6.5 was used (corresponding to less than one year after 100% watershed burn). For areas outside (San Gabriel Mountains) of which the equations are based, application of the Adjustment-Transposition (A-T) Factor must be carefully determined. To preclude any subjectivity of this very sensitive parameter and to produce conservative results, an 3-24
A-T factor 1.0 was used. Typically a factor of safety is needed because of the uncertainty in the estimation of certain parameters (A-T and FF factors), but the most conservative values were used, therefore no factor of safety was applied to produce the storage volume needed for the sizing of the basins. Results of the analysis are presented in table below. 100−Year Single Event Debris Yield Summary
100−Year
Peak
Stream Elevation
Unit Peak Length Difference Ratio
Relief Debris
Yield
Debris Drainage Area Debris
Basin
1−Hour Fire Log
DY
A−T Volume
Rainfall Discharge Runoff Factor(d) Factor (ac) (mi2
) (mi) (ft) (ft/mi) (yd3
/mi2) (yd3)
(in) (cfs) (cfs/mi2)
Equation (a)
DB1
DB2
DB10
DB9
DB9A
DB5
DB8
949.2
1425.4
131.0
1838.0
293.0
822.0
362.4

1.48 2.23

0.20 2.87

0.46 1.28

0.57 1.34

1.34 1.34

1.34 1.34
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−

3.803

3.845

0.873

4.360

1.307

2.519

1.597
1507 396.2
303.2
350.7
634.3
713.1
264.7
765.2

6.5 6.5

6.5 4.31

4.27 4.12

4.49 4.38

4.19 4.41

1.0 1.0

1.0 20,382
18,578
13,229
30,734
23,747
15,466
25,776
30,165
41,429
2,646
1166
306
2765
932
88,207
10,924
19,796
14,692
667
1222
Equation (b)
DB6(c) 8.16 1024
Note:
5133 8.02 − 3394.6 423.3 125.5 4.0 4.19 0.65 15,355 123,147 (a) LADCOE Equation 1: Log DY = 0.65(Log P) + 0.62(Log RR) + 0.18(Log A) + 0.12 (FF), for watersheds 0.1 to 3.0 mi2in size (b) LADCOE Equation 2: Log DY = 0.85(Log Q) + 0.53(Log RR) + 0.22 (FF) + 0.4 (Log A), for watershed 3.0 mi (c) An A−T Factor 0.65 was applied due to larger watershed size 2 to 10 mi2 in size
(d) An assumed condition of less than one year after 100% burn, except for DB6 which assumes only 2/3 of the watershed is susceptible to burn Detention Basins
The purpose of detention basins proposed in this plan is to reduce peak flow rates in the downstream storm drain system through the use of temporary detention storage. This peak flow reduction allows the use of smaller, less costly downstream facilities. A combination detention/debris basin (DB 11) is proposed for the upper portion of the Tuscany Hills Specific Area.

Flood Plain and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs)
The following Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) are within the City of Lake Elsinore.

1. 06065C2681G

2. 06065C2034G

3. 06065C2033G

4. 06065C2016G

5. 06065C2006G

6. 06065C2008G

7. 06065C2019G

8. 06065C2038G

9. 06065C2039G

10. 06065C2043G

11. 06065C2042G

12. 06065C2061G

13. 06065C2041G

14. 06065C2037G

15. 06065C2029G

16. 06065C2017G

17. 06065C2007G

18. 06065C2036G

19. 06065C2028G

20. 06065C2009G

21. 06065C2026G
3-25
Figure 3-7 is a compiled FIRMs within the City limits.

Figure 3-7
Flood Plain & Flood Insurance Rate Maps
The following Specific Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) flooding sources have been identified based on the above FIRMs. The development within these areas needs to be in full compliance with the current National Flood Insurance Policy (NFIP) guidelines.

1. Lake Elsinore Overflow and Spillway Channel

2. Rice Canyon

3. McVicker Canyon

4. Sedco Hills Creek

5. Wash D

6. Arroyo Del Toro Creek

7. Stovepipe Canyon Creek

8. Temescal Wash
3-26
Rice Canyon
Flooding from Rice Canyon is shown on FIRM Panels 06065C2017G and 06065C2008G and would be caused by the failure of an earthen berm that is intended to direct the flows to the northeast and into Temescal Wash. The berm failure allows the flow to breakout to the southeast resulting in an area of expansive sheet flow.

McVicker Canyon
McVicker Canyon Channel Zone A floodplain is shown on FRIM Panels 06065C2016G, 06065C2008G, 06065C2017G, and 06065C2009G. The flooding as shown on the FIRMs is indicative of a typical sheet flows on the alluvial fan below the mouth of the canyon. Review of recent aerial photography of the area shows channel improvements which may alleviate the hazard to these flood prone areas.
3-27
SECTION 4 - PROPOSED MDP FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVES
A master drainage plan addresses the current and future drainage needs of a given community.

The proposed facilities may include channels, storm drains, levees, basins, dams, wetlands or any other conveyance capable of economically relieving flooding problems within the plan area.

The plan includes an estimate of facility capacity, sizes and costs.

MDP's are prepared for a variety of purposes. First, the plans provide a guide for the orderly development of the City and resolution of flooding issues. Second, they provide an estimate of costs of construction for each established MDP zone. These plans are used by the City’s Management, Community Development and Public Works Departments, Planning Commissioners and the City Council to guide development and determine Capital Project expenditures for each budget year. Finally, the plans will be used to establish Area Drainage Fees for each MDP zone, which provide for equitable distribution of facility cost.

The City of Lake Elsinore MDP update consolidates the existing 51 drainage districts to three (3) new and two (2) existing MDP Zones. New zones are: Temescal Wash Zone, Lake Zone and East Lake Zone. Within the Temescal Wash Zone, an Alberhill Sub-Zone is established to accommodate its unique development potentials and characteristics. The existing Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District West Elsinore MDP and Lakeland Village MDP will remain unchanged.

Temescal Wash Zone
The Temescal Wash Zone, named for its receiving water Temescal Wash, encompasses an approximately 13,230-acre watershed at the northwestern end of the Lake. Within its watershed, an area of approximately 9,000-acre is within the City Boundary, of which 2,240 acres are separated into Alberhill Sub-Zone. It is generally bordered by the city boundary to the north and west, the West Elsinore MDP to the south and the Lake Zone to the east. Within the Temescal Wash Zone, located at the northwest corner of the City, an Alberhill Sub-Zone is established due to its unique development potentials and intensity and independence of the MDP facilities. In this report, the MDP facilities for the Alberhill Sub-Zone are excluded from the Temescal Wash Zone and treated as a stand alone zone.

The proposed Temescal Wash MDP facilities are comprised of four (4) debris basins and Ten (10) storm drain systems. Two of the debris basins located north of Freeway I-15 (DB1 and DB2) will benefit both Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub Zone, the cost of these two debris basins are shared equally between Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub Zone. The location, alignment and size of the Temescal Wash Zone MDP facilities are shown on Grid Map sheets A2, B2 and B3 and Figure 4-1. The estimated total cost for Temescal Wash MDP facilities is approximately $31,135,562.
4-28
Figure 4-1
Temescal Wash Zone MDP Facilities
4-29
Line T01 Storm Drain System
Line T01 Storm Drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and two laterals. The upstream portions of the drainage system are located within Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 36557. Line T01 begins near the northeast tract boundary and collects runoff from the offsite areas to the west in a 48” RCP. From there, the 48” RCP extends in a southerly direction for a distance of approximately 500 feet to the confluence with T01-01. At the T01-01 confluence, the 48” RCP transitions into a 72” RCP and extends in a northeasterly direction for a distance of approximately 1,800 feet and outlets into a natural wash at the tract’s northern boundary. From there, Line T01 is a natural unimproved channel for a distance of approximately 3,000 feet until it crosses an unnamed Road (dirt road crossing) near Nichols Road. Line T01 transitions into a 72” RCP and extends in an easterly direction for a distance of approximately 1,400 feet and outlets into Temescal Creek. Lateral T01-01 begins near the southwestern boundary of VTTM 36557 and joins with an existing 36” storm drain from the adjacent development. From there the 36” RCP extends easterly along Terra Cotta Road for a distance of approximately 1,300 feet and confluences with Line T01. Lateral T01-02 begins near the intersection of Dryden Street and Arnold Avenue as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP extends northwesterly along proposed Terracina Drive and transitions into a 42” RCP at proposed Sicily Drive. The 42” RCP continues along proposed Terracina Drive for a distance of approximately 400 feet then outlets into the intract water quality/detention basin.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T01 is approximately $3,870,000.

Line T02 Storm Drain System
Line T02 Storm Drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and two laterals. The upstream portions of the drainage system (Laterals T02-01 and T02-02) are located within Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 36557. The upstream origin of Line T02 begins near the northwest boundary of VTTM 36557 at the proposed in-tract water quality/detention basin outlet as a 66” RCP. From there the 66” RCP follows an existing wash in a northeasterly direction for a distance of approximately 2,100 feet. At Baker Street, the 66” RCP transitions into a 78” RCP and continues in a northwesterly direction for a distance of approximately 950 feet and outlets into the Temescal Wash. Lateral T02-01 begins near the intersection of Bulluno Way and proposed Venice Lane (per VTTM 36557) at the edge of the development to collect runoff from offsite hillside areas as a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends northeasterly along proposed Venice Lane and turns northwesterly and follows the northern tract boundary and confluences with Line T02. Lateral T02- 02 begins at the intersection of proposed Porta Marina Lane and Swan Avenue as a 36” RCP.

From there the 36” RCP extends northwesterly along Swan Avenue and turns northeasterly at Dryden Street. At Sicily Drive, the 36” RCP transitions into a 42” RCP, and then extends in a northerly direction towards Dolbeer Street as a 48” RCP. At the south end of Dolbeer Street, the 48” RCP transitions into a 54” RCP and extends northerly along Dolbeer Street and then turns easterly at proposed Florence Drive. From there the 54” RCP follows Florence Drive for approximately 1,300 and turn northerly and outlets into the in-tract water quality/detention basin.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T02 is approximately $5,412,000. 4-30
Line T03 Storm Drain System
Line T03 consists of a single mainline storm drain. Approximately 225 acres of sub-watershed drain to Line T03, with its upstream 161.1 acres zoned as rural mountainous residential and low density residential, and its downstream 63.9 acres zoned as manufacturing. The natural, well defined drainage courses will be utilized for the rural low density areas. An underground storm drain system will convey the storm runoff from the natural drainage course through the manufacturing zone to Temescal Wash.

Line T03 begins as a 66” RCP and extends northerly along its natural drainage course for a distance of approximately 900 feet. At Baker Street, the 66” RCP transitions into a 72” RCP and follows Baker Street in a northwesterly direction for a distance of approximately 450 feet. From there, the 72” RCP transitions into a 78” RCP and extends in a northerly direction for approximately 500 feet and outlets into the Temescal Wash.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T03 is approximately $1,723,000.

Line T04 and T05 Storm Drain System
Line T04 and T05 are located at southwesterly of District’s Gunnerson Pond, near upstream end of Temescal Wash, zoned mostly hillside residential. Currently there is no existing storm drain facility for this 138-acre sub-watershed. Our field investigation indicated that this area experiences some hillside storm runoff flooding, erosion, street flooding and ponding at varies locations.

Line T04 is a 36” RCP storm drain, begins at Herbert Street, extends southeasterly 220 feet to McBride Avenue, and extends approximately 310 feet easterly along McBride Avenue, crosses Gunnerson Street and outlets into the Gunnerson Pond. Line T05 is a single mainline storm drain on Shrier Drive. Its size varies from 54” RCP to 60” RCP, with total length approximately 1000 feet, and also outlets into the Gunnerson Pond.

The estimated costs for Line T04 and T05 are approximately $196,000 and $642,000 respectively.

Line T06 Storm Drain System
Line T06 is a 42” RCP single line storm drain. It begins at the intersection of Stecher Avenue and Foster Street, extends approximately 1250 feet northerly along Foster Street, outlets to the EVMWD pond easterly of Gunnerson Pond. The upstream end of Line T06 consists of 61.4 acres of steep hill side zoned as rural mountainous residential, the well-defined natural water courses will be utilized for storm runoff conveyance.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T06 is approximately $519,000.

Line T07 Storm Drain System
Line T07 is a single line storm drain. It begins at intersection of Strickland Avenue and Palm Drive as a 36” RCP, extends approximately 250 feet northwesterly along Strickland Avenue, at Bastron Avenue, 36” RCP transitions to 42” RCP, it continues in a northeasterly direction for approximately 450 feet, then outlets to the existing EVMWD drainage ditch.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T07 is approximately $292,000. 4-31
Line T08 Storm Drain System
Line T08 is a single line storm drain system; it can also be identified as Chaney Street Storm Drain. It begins at the intersection of Strickland Avenue and Chaney Street as a 36” RCP, extends approximately 360 feet northwesterly along Chaney Street, at Treleven Avenue, 36” RCP transitions to 54” RCP, it continues northerly along Chaney for approximately 550 feet, then discharges to the 42” stub out of Outlet Channel.

Currently, Chaney Street at Treleven Avenue and Strickland Avenue intersections experience some street flooding and ponding during and after a rain storm. The construction of Line T08 with its inlets and catch basins will reduce or eliminate the flooding. The capacity of existing 42” stub out at the southeast quadrant of Chaney Street and Outlet Channel shall be verified during the final design of the Line T08.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T08 is approximately $432,000.

Line T09 Storm Drain System
Figure 4-2 Line T09 Lower Portion Exhibit
Line T09 is a storm drain system also known as Third Street Storm Drain. The upper portion of the Line T09 begins at Cressida Street basin outlet as a 48” RCP (Tract 26476, MB 403/7-29) extends approximately 760 feet southwesterly along a natural ravine, transitions to 60” RCP for approximately 1,030 feet, transitions to 66” RCP and continues westerly along a natural water course for approximately 1,600 feet, then discharges to the defined water course / open space Lot “C” per Tract 25479, MB 367/95-113. h
The lower portion of the Line T09 system consists of one main line and two laterals. The proposed Line T09 begins at northerly boundary of TTM 32537; it travels southerly between lots 9 and 10 as a 72” RCP, then continues westerly and southerly along “A” Street for approximately 920 feet.

At the intersection of “A” Street and Welch Drive, it extends southwesterly following Welch Drive for approximately 700 feet, turns southeasterly along Conard Avenue for 550 feet then turns 4-32
southwesterly on Third Street for approximately 1300 feet. At the intersection of Third Street and Cambern Avenue, the 72” RCP Line T09 confluents with Line T09-02, and transitions to 78” RCP and extends 1,140 feet on Third Street. It transitions to a 96” RCP, Continue further southwesterly on Third Street for 290 feet, confluences with Line T09-01 at south of Dexter Avenue, travels toward I-15 for 260 feet. A Jack and Bore or tunneling operation is proposed for the 96” RCP crossing under the I-15 Freeway, then transition to a 5’x10’ RCB for 310 feet, and finally transitions to double 14’ wide x 4.5’ high RCB to join the existing double RCB at Collier Avenue.

Since the Line T09 System is the most costly system within the Temescal Wash Zone, the design alternatives were reviewed during the preliminary and final design of the Third Street Storm Drain.

The current alignment and freeway crossing method was selected as the most viable alternative.

Furthermore, the upper portion of the Line T09 may be replaced by an enhanced natural drainage channel and open spaces, if the proposed land planning incorporates such a design feature.

Line T09-01 is a single line storm drain lateral, it’s upstream portion within Tentative Tract Map 35422 consists of approximately 2,000 feet of 36” RCP, a 720 feet of double 48” RCP and three on-site detention and water quality basins. At TTM 35422 southwesterly boundary, the double 48” RCP transitions to a 60” RCP, travels in a westerly direction to discharge into mainline T01 south of the intersection of Third Street and Dexter Avenue.

Line T09-02 is also a single line storm drain lateral of 48” RCP, approximately 410 feet in length on Cambern Avenue. This lateral is designed to collect and convey the storm drain runoff at the low point of Cambern Avenue to Line T09 to enable the development of the Walmart site.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T09 System is approximately $12,803,000.

Line T10 Storm Drain System
Line T10 Storm Drain System is located immediately north of State Route 74, with Crumpton Road on the east, and the City boundary on the west. It’s located at south end of North Peak Specific Plan, zoned mostly for commercial use. The Line T10 System consists of a storm drain mainline, one lateral and one debris basin. Debris Basin DB10 is located at the upstream terminus of Line T10-01 and has a drainage area of 131 acres, sediment storage volume of approximately

1.7 acre-feet and an approximate right-of-way of 0.4 acres.

The upstream segment of Line T10 Storm Drain begins at a natural low point on Mauricio Street east of Crumpton Road as a 36” RCP. It travels southerly for 300 feet then transitions to a 42” RCP, turns westerly along the natural stream line for a distance of approximately 1,480 feet. The 42” RCP then transitions to 48” RCP and continues in a westerly direction for a distance of 1,600 feet. After confluence with Line T10-01, the 48” RCP increases to a 78” RCP for 330 feet, and discharges at the City boundary approximately 500’ north of SR 74.

Line T10-01 begins at the outlet of the proposed Debris Basin DB10 as a 48” RCP runs southwesterly along the natural water course for a distance of 480 feet and transitions to a 66” RCP for a distance of 370 feet, then confluences with Mainline T10.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line T10 System is approximately $2,652,000. 4-33
Debris Basins DB1 and DB2
Debris Basins DB1 and DB2 are located approximately 1,800 feet north of the intersection of I-15 freeway and Lake Street, at northerly boundary of Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. Debris Basin DB1 has a drainage area of 949 acres with an estimated debris volume of 18.7 ac-ft. Debris Basin DB2 has a drainage area of 1,425 acres with an estimated debris volume of 25.6 ac-ft. These two basins benefit both Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub-Zone. More importantly, when constructed and maintained, they will reduce the silt and debris and improve the water quality of the Temescal Wash. The estimated cost is approximately $1,471,000 and $2,014,000 respectively. At the recommendation of the City, the costs for these two debris basins are shared by Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub-Zone equally.

Debris Basins DB5
Debris Basins DB5 is located south of Nichols Road and north of I-15. Debris Basin DB5 has a drainage area of 822 acres with an estimated debris volume of 12.3 ac-ft. Currently, after each storm event, silt and debris wash over to the Elsinore Outlet Center through existing Caltrans culverts, placing heavy demands on City’s maintenance and operation resources and budget. By placing DB5 on an alignment upstream of the Caltrans 14’x6’ Box Culvert, it will intercept and store the debris in the DB5, reduce the impact to the Outlet Center and demand on the city resource, and improve the water quality of the Temescal Wash.

The estimated cost for DB5 is approximately $968,000.

Debris Basins DB10
Debris Basins DB10 is located at the upstream end of MDP T10-01 System. Debris Basin DB10 has a drainage area of 131 acres with an estimated debris volume of 1.7 ac-ft. Since most of the DB10 drainage areas are undeveloped land, DB10 will not only benefit water quality, maintenance and operation, but also reduce the size of MDP T10-01 and T10, so 100-year storm event runoff will not need to be bulked due to the debris loading.

The estimated cost for DB10 is approximately $134,000.
4-34
Alberhill Sub-Zone
Alberhill Sub-Zone is located within the Temescal Wash MPD Zone and is made up of several Specific Plans (SPs). Located within this MDP Sub-Zone are the Alberhill Village SP, Alberhill Ranch SP, and the Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP. The Alberhill Sub-Zone is located in the northwestern portion of the city, bounded by the West Elsinore MDP to the south, Santa Ana Mountains to the west, northern city boundary to the north, and Temescal Creek to the east. The Alberhill Sub-Zone encompasses approximately 2,240 acres and includes nine (9) separate subwatersheds which drain into the Temescal Wash as shown on Grid Sheets A1 and A2.

The area is primarily comprised of undeveloped land that is currently being mined for its mineral resources (clay sand, and aggregate mining), and as a result most of the area is highly disturbed due to the current and past mining operations. Alberhill Ridge Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 35001 is located on the east side of Lake Street proposes a 400 acre medium density residential development. Alberhill Villages, located on the west side of Lake Street proposes a 1,400 acre development. It includes plans for a multifaceted community consisting of a university campus, recreational lake, park areas, and residential developments ranging from low density estates lots to high density multi-family lots, and mixed-use commercial and public institutions and schools. The proposed MDP facilities within the Alberhill Sub-Zone mostly utilize the alignment, type and size of the storm drain depicted in the supplemental drainage studies for the Specific Plans and Tentative Maps.

The proposed MDP facilities are comprised of five (5) debris basins, eleven (11) storm drain systems and nine (9) discharge points at the Temescal Creek. Two of the debris basins located north of the I-15 Freeway (DB1 and DB2) will benefit both Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub Zone, the cost of these two debris basins are shared equally between Temescal Wash Zone and Alberhill Sub Zone.

The proposed underground storm drains consist of reinforced concrete pipes ranging in size from 36 inches to 108 inches in diameter. Reinforced concrete boxes were used when the capacity of a 108 inch diameter pipe was exceeded. Open channels are trapezoidal shape with concrete paving on the sides and bottom. The sides slope upward from the bottom at a rate of one foot vertically for every 1.5 feet horizontally. The location, alignment and size of the proposed Alberhill Sub-Zone MDP facilities are depicted on Grid Map sheets A1 & A2. The estimated total cost is approximately $66,000,000.

Line A01 Storm Drain System
Line A01 Storm Drain is located in Watershed A01 of the Alberhill Villages SP and consists of a single 36” diameter RCP extending approximately 950 feet from its upstream terminus (adjacent to the existing Horsethief Canyon development) to its downstream outlet at the city boundary.

From this point it is assumed that the flows will follow their natural drainage course (a distance of 1,400 feet) to Temescal Creek.
4-35
Line A02 Storm Drain System
Line A02 Storm Drain System is located in Watershed A02 of the Alberhill Ranch SP and consists of a mainline, one lateral and a debris basin. Line A02 Debris Basin (DB8) is located at the upstream terminus of Line A02 and has a sediment storage volume of approximately 9.0 acrefeet. Line A02 Storm Drain is an open channel with a bottom width of 8 feet and a height of 4 feet.

It begins at the proposed debris basin and runs in a northeasterly direction, crosses two proposed streets, for a distance of about 3,000 feet and terminates at the city boundary. From this point it is assumed than the flows will follow their natural drainage course (a distance of 1,200 feet) to Temescal Creek. Lateral A02-01 varies in size from a 36” diameter pipe at its upstream end to a 48” diameter pipe at its confluence with Line A02. The overall length is approximately 2,400 feet.

Line A03 Storm Drain System
Line A03 Storm Drain System consists of a single mainline storm drain and is located in Watershed A03 of the Alberthill Ranch SP. It has a total drainage area of approximately 72 acres at its most downstream outlet point. Line A03 Storm Drain varies in size from a 36” diameter pipe at its upstream end to a 48” diameter pipe at its downstream terminus at the city boundary for a distance of approximately 2,300 feet. From this point it is assumed than the flows will follow their natural drainage course (a distance of 900 feet) to Temescal Creek.

Line A04 Storm Drain System
Line A04 Storm Drain System is located in Watershed A04 of the Alberhill Ranch SP and consists of a mainline, one lateral and two debris basins. Line A04 Debris Basin DB9 is located at the upstream terminus of Line A04 and has a sediment storage volume of approximately 54.7 acrefeet and an approximate right-of-way of 11.5 acres. The upstream segment of Line A04 Storm Drain is an open channel with a bottom width of 20 feet and a height of 4 feet. It begins at the proposed Debris Basin DB9 and runs northerly along the west side of Lincoln Street for a distance of 3,000 feet and ends at Debris Basin DB9A.

Debris Basin DB9A is located approximately 1,500 north of the intersection of the future Lincoln Street and the future extension of Nichols Road and has a sediment storage volume of approximately 6.8 acre-feet and an approximate right-of-way of 1.4 acres. Downstream of Debris Basin DB9A, Line A04 is a double 10 feet wide by 10 feet high reinforced concrete box (RCB) that runs northerly along the alignment of Lincoln Street for a distance of approximately 6,900 feet and terminates at Temescal Creek.

Lateral A04-01 varies in size from a 42” diameter pipe at its upstream end to a 66” diameter pipe at its confluence with A04. The overall length is approximately 2,600 feet.

Line A05 Storm Drain System
Line A05 Storm Drain System consists of a mainline storm drain, six laterals, and five sub-laterals and is located in Watershed A05 of the Alberhill Villages SP and Alberhill Ridge VTTM 35001.

The overall drainage area at its downstream outlet at Temescal creek is approximate 1.8 square 4-36
miles. The upstream origin of Line A05 begins at an existing detention basin located just north of the intersection of Lake Street and Nichols Road, and runs in a northerly direction along the alignment of Lake Street and terminates at Temescal Creek, for a distance of approximately 1.1 miles. Line A05 varies in size from a 78” diameter pipe at its upstream end to a 108” diameter pipe at the confluence with Line A05-02. At the Line A05-02 confluence, the 108” RCP transitions to a 12 feet wide by 10 feet high RCB. From there, the 12’x10’ RCB extends northerly along Lake Street and transitions to a double 10 feet high by 10 feet wide RCB at the A05-1 confluence. From the Line A05-01 confluence to the outlet at Temescal Creek, the size remains constant at a double 10 feet wide by 10 feet high RCB.

The upstream origin of Lateral A05-01 begins at the intersection of proposed Alberhill Ridge Road and “JJ” Street (per Alberhill Ridge VTTM 35001) as a 36 inch RCP. From there, the 36 inch RCP follows the alignment of Alberhill Ridge Road in a northwesterly direction for a distance of approximately 1,700 feet (with a short reach of 42 inch RCP) where it confluences with Storm Drain Line A05.

The upstream origin of Lateral A05-02 begins at the intersection of proposed “AA” Street and “GG” Street (per Alberhill Ridge VTTM 35001) as a 36 inch RCP. From there, Lateral A05-02 follows the alignment of “AA” Street and ”A” Street in a westerly direction for a distance of approximately 2,250 feet, where it confluences with Storm Drain Line A05 and varies in size from a 36” RCP to 72” RCP. Lateral A05-02-01 begins at the intersection of “Z” Street and “V” Street as a 36” RCP. From there, the 36 inch RCP follows the alignment of “V” Street in a northwesterly direction for a distance of approximately 600 feet (with a short reach of 42 inch RCP) where it confluences with Storm Drain Line A05-02.

The upstream origin of Lateral A05-03 begins at about 1,000 feet south of the intersection of the future Nichols Road and Street C (per Alberthill Villages SP) as a 42” RCP and runs northerly along the alignment of Street “C” for approximately 2,000, feet then turns easterly along an unnamed street for a distance of approximately 2,400 feet where it confluences with Storm Drain Line A05. Lateral A05-03 varies in size from a 42” RCP to a 72” RCP at its downstream confluence. Lateral A05-03 has two sub-laterals: A05-03-01 and A05-03-02. Lateral A05-03-01 begins at approximately 750 feet west of Street C, varies in size from a 36” RCP to a 48” RCP and ends at the confluence with Lateral A05-03 for a distance of approximately 1,150 feet. Lateral A05-03-02 begins at approximately700 feet west of Street C as a 36” RCP and follows the alignment of Nichols Road to the confluence with Lateral A05-03.

Lateral A05-04 begins at the intersection of Street D and Nichols Road (per Alberhill Villages SP) as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP extends northwesterly for approximately 1,750 feet to a point where it confluences with Storm Drain Line A05.

Lateral A05-05 begins at the intersection of “AA” Street and “BB” Street (per Alberthill Ridge VTTM 35001) as a 36” RCP and immediately transitions to a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends westerly along “BB” Street and transitions into a 54” RCP at the intersection of “GG” Street and “BB” Street. The 54” RCP continues westerly along “BB” Street and then transitions into a 60” RCP at the intersection of “AAA” Street and “BB” Street, and continues as a 60” RCP to the confluence with A05-05-1 where it transitions into a 72” RCP. The 72” RCP extends southerly 4-37
along “BB” Street until it confluences with Line A05 at Lake Street. Lateral A05-05-01 begins near the intersection of “N” Street and “B” Street as a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends southerly along “B” Street until it confluences with Lateral A05-05.

Lateral A05-06 begins at the intersection of “CC” Street and “ZZ” Street (per Alberhill Ridge VTTM 35001) as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP extends southerly along “CC” and transitions into a 42” RCP at the intersection of “PP” Street and “CC” Street. The 42” RCP continues southerly along “CC” Street, crosses Alberhill Ridge Road and transitions into a 60” RCP at the intersection of “J” Street and “C” Street. The 60”then continues along “C” Street and transitions into a 66” RCP at the intersection of “T” Street and “C” Street. From there the 66” RCP extends approximately 800 feet along “C” Street, then transitions into a 72” RCP continues along “C” Street and confluence with Line A05 at Lake Street.

Storm Drain Line A06
The upstream origin of Storm Drain Line A06 begins at the proposed park located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lake Street and Alberhill Ranch Road. Line A06 begins as a 36” RCP and extends through the park for a distance of about 1,400 feet and transitions into a 42” RCP, then follows along the northern park boundary to Street D where it transitions into a 48” RCP. The 48” RCP then extends northerly along Street D and turns easterly at Nichols Road and transitions into a 54” RCP at approximately 650 feet west of Lake Street. The 54” RCP continues along Nichols Road and confluence with the existing storm drain along Lake Street.

Storm Drain Line A07
The upstream origin of Storm Drain Line A07 begins at approximately 1,100 feet northeast of the intersection Nichols Road and Alberhill Ridge Road (per Alberhill Ridge VTTM 35001) as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP extends southwesterly for approximately 1,100 feet and turns northwesterly on Lake Street where it confluences with an existing storm drain on Lake Street.

Line A08 Storm Drain System
Line A08 Storm Drain System consists of a mainline storm drain and three lateral storm drains.

The overall drainage area at its downstream outlet at Temescal Creek is approximate 205 acres.

The upstream origin of system A08 begins approximately 900 feet southwest of the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and Nichol Road as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP runs easterly along Nichols Road and transitions into a 72” RCP at the confluence with A08-03 and continues easterly along Nichols Road. At the confluence with A08-02, the 72” RCP transitions into a 78” RCP, continues easterly for approximately 1,900 feet and terminates in a natural wash along the south side of Nichols Road.

Lateral A08-01 begins at the intersection of “F” Street and “A” Street (Tract Map Nos. 30836 & 37553) as a 36” RCP. From there, the 36” RCP extends southerly along “A” Street for approximately 400 feet and transitions into a 42” RCP. The 42” RCP extends southerly along “A” Street until it confluences with Line A08 at Nichols Road. Lateral A08-02 begins at approximately 1,700 feet north of Nichols Road as a 36” RCP. From there, the 36” extends southerly along a 4-38
natural wash for approximately 600 feet and transitions into a 42” RCP. The 42” RCP continues along the wash until it confluences with Line A08 at Nichols Road. Lateral A08-03 is a 36” RCP, begins at approximately 980 feet north of Nichols Road, and extends southerly confluences with line A08 at Nichols Road.

Line A09 Storm Drain System
Line A09 consists of a single mainline storm drain. The overall drainage area at its outlet at Temescal Creek is approximately 84.8 acres. The upstream origin of storm drain Line A09 begins at the intersection of “O” Street and “P” Street (Tract Map Nos. 30836 & 37553) as a 36” RCP.

From there the 36” RCP extends southerly along “O” Street and transitions into a 42” RCP at “C” Street. The 42” RCP extends easterly along “C” Street and then turns southerly at “D” Street.

From there the 42” RCP extends southerly along “D” Street and transitions into a 48” RCP at the intersection of “N” Street and “D” Street. The 48” RCP continues southerly along “D” Street and transitions into a 54” RCP prior to Nichols Road. The 54” RCP then turns easterly along Nichols Road and terminates in Temescal Creek.

Line A10 Storm Drain System
Line A10 consists of a mainline storm drain and two laterals. Line A10 begins at approximately 1,900 feet east of the I-15 Freeway on Nichols Road as a 36” RCP. The 36” RCP extends westerly along Nichols Road for about 900 feet and transitions into a 42” RCP then continues along Nichols Road and transitions into a 54” RCP at the A10-02 confluence. The 54” RCP continues westerly on Nichols Road for about 450 feet then turns northerly and follows the northbound freeway onramp and connects with an existing double 54” RCP at the I-15 Freeway (Caltrans). The upstream origin of Lateral A10-01 begins at the mouth of the natural canyon area, approximately 1,200 feet east of the I-15 Freeway as a 42” RCP. From there, the 42” RCP extends westerly and confluences with Line A10. Lateral A10-02 begins in the proposed parking lot area of the future retail center (Per Alberhill Ranch SP Amendment #3) as a 36” RCP. The 36” RCP extends approximately 1250 feet to the northwest and confluences with Line A10. Lateral A10-03 collects runoff at the mouth of the offsite canyon area where it intersects the edge of pavement. Lateral A10-03 is a 36” RCP, approximately 300 feet and confluences with Line A10 just north of Nichols Road.

Line A11 Storm Drain System
Line A11 consists of a single mainline storm drain. The upstream origins begin at the canyon mouth of the hills approximately 800 feet to the east as a 48” RCP. The 48” RCP extends southwesterly towards the I-15 Freeway and confluences with the existing Caltrans 48” RCP. 4-39
Lake Zone
Lake Zone is located in the northeasterly part of the City, encompasses an approximately 9,036- acre watershed. Its receiving water is Lake Elsinore, directly or indirectly through Canyon Lake or Lower San Jacinto River connecting Canyon Lake to Lake Elsinore. The Specific Plans within the Lake Zone are Spyglass Ranch SP, Tuscany Hills SP, Canyon Creek (La Strada) SP, Canyon Hills SP, Canyon Estates SP, City Center SP; The Specific Plans partially within the Lake Zone include North Peak SP, Ramsgate SP and East Lake SP. These Specific Plans are in various development stages, while the areas within Canyon Hills SP are mostly build out, North Peak and Canyon Estates remain in their natural, undeveloped conditions.

The proposed Lake Zone MDP facilities are comprised of one (1) debris basin, one (1) debris/ detention basin and twenty-three (23) storm drain systems. The location, alignment and size of the Lake Zone MDP facilities are depicted on Grid Map sheets A2, A3, B2, B3, C1 and C2 as shown on Figure 4-3 below. The estimated total cost for Lake Zone MDP facilities is approximately $ 32,422,000.

Figure 4-3
Lake Zone MDP Facilities
4-40
Line L-1 to L-5 Storm Drain Systems
Line L-1 to L-5 systems are located at the north shore of the Lake, west of the District’s Outlet Channel. This area comprises mostly older residential neighborhoods with school, park and light commercial uses mixed in. Currently there is no existing storm drain facility for this area. Our field investigation indicated that this area experiences some street flooding and ponding at varies locations along Lakeshore Drive and Heald Avenue. Line L-1 to L-3 sub-watersheds drain directly to the Lake, Line L-4 and L-5 sub-watersheds drain to the lower Outlet Channel then discharge to the Lake, as shown on Grid Sheet B3.

Line L-1 is a single line 36” RCP storm drain totaling 710 feet in length, begins at Heald Street, extends westerly to Adam Avenue, and extends southerly to Lakeshore Drive, then southeasterly along Lakeshore Drive and discharges into the Lake.

Line L-2 system starts at the intersection of Heald Avenue and Mohr Street, travels approximately 660 feet southerly along Mohr Street, turns westerly along Lakeshore Drive for 200 feet, confluences with Line 2-1, then turns southerly for a distance of 290 feet and discharges into the Lake. Line L2-1 is a 36” RCP single line storm drain which begins at the intersection of Heald and Townsend Street, extends 360 feet along Townsend, turning southeasterly on Lakeshore Drive and confluences with Line L-2.

Line L-3 is a single mainline storm drain. It size varies beginning as a 36” RCP along Lindsay Street for a length of 1050 feet, then turns west along Limited Avenue and transitions to a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends westerly for a distance of 670 feet, at the intersection of Limited Avenue and Lakeshore Drive, Line L-3 turns southerly for approximately 300 feet and outlets to the Lake.

Since Line L-1, L-2 and L-3 all directly discharge runoff to the Lake, appropriate water quality treatments are required at the each discharge point.

Line L-4 is a 36” single line storm drain which begins at the intersection of Langstaff Street and Pottery Street, travels along Pottery to the east for a distance of 420 feet, and outlets to an existing 24” stub out on Outlet Channel.

Line L-5 is a 36” single line storm drain which begins at Langstaff Street and terminates at Flint Street, west of Outlet Channel, outlets to an existing stub out of the channel.

The estimated costs for Line L-1 to L-5 systems are approximately $2,269,000.

Line L-6 Storm Drain System
Line L-6 storm drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and an existing 54” Caltrans culvert and 600’ feet of Caltrans concrete lined drainage ditch. The upstream origin of Line L-6 begins approximately 520’ north of the existing 54” Caltrans culvert, along Elsinore Hill Road proposed by Tentative Tract Map 35337, Spyglass Ranch as a 36” RCP, and discharges into the existing 54” pipe culvert south of the I-15 Freeway. Line 6 reassumes its alignment at the end of Caltrans ditch near the north end of Lookout Street as a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends 330 feet southerly on Lookout Street, turns westerly along Flint Street as a 48” RCP for 340 feet, increases its size to a 54” RCP for a distance of approximately 1,240, then discharges into the Outlet Channel.
4-41
The estimated cost for the proposed Line L-6 system is approximately $1,235,000.

Line L-7 Storm Drain System
Similar to the Line L-6 system, Line L-7 storm drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and three existing Caltrans culverts and a section of natural drainage ditch along the south side of the I-15 Freeway. The upstream origin of Line L-7 begins approximately 1070’ north of the existing 39” Caltrans culvert, along a natural valley as a 36” RCP, and discharges into the existing 39” pipe culvert north of the I-15 Freeway. Line 7 reassumes its alignment near the north end of Adobe Street as a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP extends 790 feet southerly along Adobe Street, turns westerly along Pottery Street as a 54” RCP for 1410 feet. At the intersection of Pottery Street and Ellis Street, Line L-7 increases its size to a 60” RCP along Pottery Street for a distance of approximately 1,070 feet and discharges into the Outlet Channel.

The estimated cost for MDP Line L-7 system is approximately $2,309,000.

Line L-8 and L-9 Storm Drain Systems
Line L-8 and L-9 systems are located east of the District’s Outlet Channel. This area comprises mostly older residential neighborhoods with approximately 33 acres of steep hillside at its easterly end. Currently there is no existing storm drain facility for this area. Our field investigation indicated that this area experiences some street flooding, ponding and hillside erosion at various locations.

Line L-8 is a single line 36” RCP storm drain totaling 650 feet in length, which begins at Main Street, extends westerly along Summer Avenue, and outlets to the Outlet Channel.

Line L-9 system is a single line 36” RCP storm drain totaling 600 feet in length, which begins at Main Street, extends westerly along Franklin Street, and outlets to the Outlet Channel.

The estimated costs for Line L-8 and Line L-9 are approximately $535,000.

Line L-10 to L-13 Storm Drain Systems
Line L-10 to L-13 systems are located at the northeast corner of the Lake, between Ridge Road and the San Jacinto River inlet channel. This area is comprised of mostly older residential neighborhoods with an undeveloped steep hillside to the north, and a school and commercial site to the east. Currently there are few existing storm drains within Line L-13 sub-watershed. Our field investigation indicated that this area experiences some street flooding, ponding on Mill Street near the Railroad Canyon Elementary School site and along Lakeshore Drive. Hillside erosion and storm runoff which floods residents have also occurred on Avenue 6 and 7, along Country Club Blvd. and Acacia Street. The areas south of Lakeshore Drive, east of Lakepoint Park are within the East Lake Specific Plan. The land use within the SP is still evolving.

Line L-10 to L-13 Systems can be found on Grid Map Sheet B3, and also shown on Figure 4-4. 4-42
Figure 4-4
Lake Zone MDP Line L-10 to L-13
Line L-10 is a single mainline storm drain system which begins at Acacia Street extends southerly along High Street, crosses Lakeshore Drive and outlets to the Lake. Line L-10 size varies from 36” RCP upstream to 72” RCP at the outlet near the Lake. The estimated cost for Line L-10 is approximately $1,343,000.

Line L-11 system is a single mainline storm drain system, which begins at Mill Street and Avenue 2, extends westerly to Avenue 1, turns southerly along Avenue 1 to Lakeshore Drive, travels along Lakeshore Drive in an easterly direction, turns south again along Lucene Street and outlets to the Lake. Line L-11 size varies from 36” RCP upstream to 54” RCP at the outlet near the Lake. The estimated cost for Line L-11 is approximately $1,300,000.

Line L-12 system is a single mainline storm drain system, which begins at Mill Street and Avenue 4, extends southerly to Parkway, turns easterly along Parkway then turns southerly on Pepper Street to the intersection of Pepper and Dawe Street. From there Line L-12 travels along Dawe Street easterly for a distance of 280 feet to Avenue 6, then turns southerly for a distance of approximately 1200 feet and outlets to the Lake. Line L-12 size varies from 36” RCP upstream to 54” RCP at the outlet near the Lake. The estimated cost for Line L-12 is approximately $1,252,000.

Line L-13 storm drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and one lateral. Currently there is some street flooding and roadside erosion along Avenue 6, Avenue 7 and Mill Street. Existing local storm drains and catch basins are on Mill Street that conveys the storm runoff to the concrete ditch along westerly side of the Railroad Canyon Elementary School site, and outlets near the Park Way Cul-De-Sac. The upstream origin of Line L-13 begins at Park Way Cul-De-Sac as a 36” RCP, travels southerly 650 feet to Lakeshore Drive. From there the Line L-13 pipe size increases to 42” RCP follows Lakeshore Drive in an easterly direction for 660 feet, increases to 48” RCP for 4-43
a distance of 730 feet, confluences with Lateral L-13-1 and connects /outlets into the existing 75” RCP Storm Drain. Lateral L-13-1 begins at the outlet of an existing storm drain at Park Way and Avenue 12 as a 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP follows the Avenue 12 alignment for a distance of approximately 850 feet and then confluences with Line L-13.

The estimated cost for Line L-13 system is approximately $1,140,000.

Line L-14 Storm Drain System
Line L-14 Storm Drain System is a major drainage facility proposed to extend the Wasson Canyon Channel Stage 1 facilities constructed by the District. The existing Wasson Canyon Channel facilities began at south side I-15 Wasson Canyon Bridge as a collector channel, transitions to an 18 foot wide and 10.5 foot high RCB crosses under Collier Avenue to a debris basin, then discharges into the Outlet Channel at its ridge point. Theoretically, Wasson Canyon storm runoff will split evenly, 50 % draining to Lake Elsinore and 50% draining to Temescal Wash. Currently there are no other existing master plan drainage facilities upstream of the I-15 Freeway Wasson Canyon Bridge.

Addressee
Figure 4-5
Lake Zone MDP Line L-14 and Wasson Canyon Sub-watershed Wasson Canyon sub-watershed is comprised of approximately 8 square miles of land, with a 100- year peak flow of 3400 CFS, draining generally north to south. The mid and upper portion of the canyon has a well-defined natural water course with year-round vegetation. At its lower (south) end, south of Rosetta Canyon Drive, Wasson Canyon becomes flatter and less defined. Some properties and city streets at south end of Wasson Canyon experienced some flooding and erosion damage in the past. Based on the unit hydrographic studies, debris basin DB 6 analysis, and input from the City, Line L-14 system is proposed.
4-44
Initially, the Line L-14 system was designed as a double 14’ x7’ RCB with total length of 1,960 feet with a debris basin DB6 at its upstream end. The total estimated cost for the RCB system and DB 6 is approximately $8,908,000 and $ 5,979,000 respectively.

Due to the high cost of the Line L14 System, an alternative study of combined RCB (at Camino Del Norte road crossing) and concrete lined channel was conducted. With the open channel alternative, debris can be removed from the channel, and the existing debris basin south of the I15 Freeway can be utilized for silt and misc. trash removal. The estimated size of the lined trapezoidal channel is 40 feet wide at the bottom with 1.5:1 side slopes and a depth of 7 feet. Due to the significant cost savings, this alternative is selected for MDP Line L-14.

The estimated cost for Line L-14 system is approximately $3,740,000.

Line L-15 Storm Drain System
Line L-15 is a single mainline 36” RCP storm drain totaling 2,710 feet in length, proposed by Spyglass Ranch, Tract 35337. The estimated cost for Line L-15 is approximately $938,000.

Line L-16 Storm Drain System
Line L-16 system consists of a mainline storm drain and a Lateral L-16-1, proposed by Tract 31593 South Shore I and Tract 36567 South Shore II in conjunction with on-site detention and water quality basins. Line L-16 system discharges into Wasson Canyon drainage course.

The estimated cost for Line L-16 system is approximately $4,670,000.

Line L-17 – Line L-20 Storm Drain Systems
Figure 4-6
Lake Zone MDP Line L-17 to Line L-20
Line L-17 is a single mainline 36” RCP storm drain totaling 800 feet in length, located north of the I-15 Freeway, west of Franklin Street.
4-45
The estimated cost for Line L-17 system is approximately $290,000.

Line L-18 storm drain system consists of a mainline and three Laterals. The upstream portion of the Line L-18 system (Laterals L-18-2 and L-18-3 and two water quality basins) as shown on Figure 4-6 was proposed by Tract 36567, South Shore II.

Line L-18 begins at Lateral L-18-3 basin outlet structure travels along future La Strada Road in a southerly direction to Grunder Drive, then outlets to the existing Caltrans concrete ditch.

The estimated cost for Line L-18 system is approximately $2,775,000.

Line L-19 is a single mainline 60” RCP storm drain totaling 1,370 feet in length, located north of Canyon View Drive, extending from the existing 72” storm drain constructed in conjunction with the development of Canyon Creek Specific Plan.

The estimated cost for Line L-19 system is approximately $976,000.

Line L-20 is a single mainline storm drain. Totaling 800 feet in length, located north of Scenic Ridge Drive, extending from the existing 66” storm drain. Line L-20 varies in size from a 36” RCP at its upstream end to a 48” RCP at the downstream end and has an overall length of approximately 1,730 feet.

The estimated cost for Line L-20 system is approximately $667,000.

Line L-21 Storm Drain System
Line L-21 Storm Drain System consists of a single mainline storm drain and is located in subwatershed L-21 of the Tuscany Hills SP. The upstream origin of Line L-21 begins approximately 850 feet southwest of the intersection of Greenwald Avenue and Little Valley Road as a 48” RCP.

From there the 48” RCP extends in a southerly direction along the proposed streets for a distance of approximately 850 feet and outlets in a proposed water quality basin.

The estimated cost for Line L-21 system is approximately $528,000.

Detention Basin DB11
The purpose of this detention basin is to reduce peak flow rates in the downstream storm drain system through the use of temporary detention storage. This peak flow reduction allows the use of smaller, less costly downstream facilities. A combination detention/debris basin is proposed for the upper portion of the Tuscany Hills Specific Area. The basin will reduce the downstream flow rate due to the temporary storage effect (hydrograph attenuation) and due to the removal of sediments (un-bulked). In addition it will be much easier and less costly to clean out a basin than it would be to clean out an underground drainage system. The Tuscany Hills Debris/Detention Basin DB11 has a volume of approximately 25.0 acre-feet and an approximate right-of-way of 5.3 acres.

Line L-22 Storm Drain System
Line L-22 storm drain system consists of a mainline storm drain and one lateral. The upstream origin of Line L-22 begins near the northwest boundary of the Tuscany Hills SP at the proposed Debris/Detention Basin DB11 outlet as a 42” RCP. From there the 42” RCP follows the proposed streets in a southeasterly direction and outlets into a proposed water quality/detention basin. Line 4-46
L-22 varies in size from a 42” RCP at its upstream end to a 66” RCP at the downstream end and has an overall length of approximately 4,300 feet. Lateral L22-1 begins at the western boundary of Tuscany Hills SP as 36” RCP. From there the 36” RCP follows the proposed street alignment for a distance of approximately 2,200 and then confluences with Line L-22.

The estimated cost for Line L-22 system including DB 11 is approximately $5,907,000.

Line L-23 Storm Drain System
Line L-23 storm drain system consists of a single mainline storm drain. The upstream origin of Line L-23 begins at the western boundary of the Tuscany Hill SP and collects offsite runoff from the hills to the west and conveys it through the development and discharges the runoff in a natural wash to the south. Line L-23 varies in size from a 36” RCP at its upstream end to a 42” RCP at the downstream end and has an overall length of approximately 15100 feet.

The estimated cost for Line L-23 system is approximately $550,000. 4-47
East Lake Zone
The East Lake Zone, named for the East Lake Specific Plan, covers approximately 3000-acres at the southeastern end of Lake Elsinore. It is generally bordered by the city boundary to the south and east, the lake to the west and the San Jacinto River Inlet Channel to the north. Most of the East Lake Zone lies within a 100-year flood plain; as a result, the East Lake Zone has been significantly impacted during wet seasons.

A joint powers authority named Lake Elsinore Management Authority was formed in the late1980s, it led the efforts to stabilize the fluctuating level of water in the lake. As a component of those efforts, the levee along the East Lake Zone northern boundary was constructed in 1995.

The levee effectively reduced the size of the water surface by about half resulting in reduction of lake evaporation. The levee also provided flood protection for the East Lake Zone.

The development within the East Lake area is primarily governed by the approved East Lake Specific Plan, its development agreements and amendments. The East Lake SP Amendment 8 established that the lowest floor in all development areas shall be raised above the FEMA 100- year flood plain elevation of 1267 feet mean sea level. To allow for regional flood storage, the set aside open space and park will be graded to an elevation of 1240 or below, no import earth shall be used to raise the building pad areas.

Figure 4-1
East Lake Zone
4-48
Within the East Lake Zone, the existing developments include a master planned residential neighborhood, “Summerly” (Tract 31920); an 18-hole golf course “The Links at Summerly”; a limited mix of industrial and commercial; an air strip with hangers and supporting facilities and medium-density residential developments at southeast corner.

Currently, existing drainage facilities that provide some level of flood protection within this zone are as follows:

City Facilities
Pete Lehr Drive Storm Drain (54” RCP)
Storm Drain systems associated with Tract 31920 Summerly developments Storm Drain systems associated with Tract 30846 developments Ontario Way Storm Drain (84” RCP)
District Facilities
Palomar Channel (Tract 30846)
SEDCO MDP Line D (daylight channel)
SEDCO MDP Line E (daylight channel)
Located across Mission Trail and Corydon Street in the City of Wildomar is the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SEDCO MDP. The storm runoffs from SEDCO area with approximate 2,675 acres of land discharge to the back basin, the area behind the levee bounded by the City limits, with Wildomar on the north, east and south in the East Lake Zone.

This discharge of runoff has a significant impact to the proposed land use and flooding within the back basin of the East Lake Zone. The District’s Master Drainage Plan for the SEDCO Area dated March 1982 proposes Lines A, B and C. These facilities were reevaluated with City of Wildomar MDP, and the 100-year peak discharge rates provided by the City of Wildomar on December 11, 2019, are used for sizing the proposed storm drain facilities. 4-49
The proposed Storm Drain Line E-1 and Line E-2 systems are designed to accept the Wildomar MDP Line A through E peak flows, convey the runoffs to the designated open spaces for storm water storage, mitigation and ultimately discharging to the lake.

Line E-1 Storm Drain System
The Line E-1 Storm Drain System is located west of the Mission Trail / City boundary and east of “Summerly” developments.

Line E-1-1 is a single cell 12’ (width) x6’ (depth) RCB, the upstream end begins at Mission Trail and Sedco Blvd, as an outlet for combined Line A, B & C of the Sedco MDP storm drain. Line E1-1’s overall length is approximately 2,100 feet at its confluence junction with Line E-1.

Line E-1 is a double-cell RCB system, with its size varying from a double 8’ x7’ at Mission Trail and Vine Street to a double 10’x8’ at its outlet. The Line E-1 upstream segment, approximately 1,850 feet in length, has the capacity of 1,515 CFS for combined Line D and Olive Street Storm Drain per the Wildomar MDP study. The downstream segment from the confluence point with Line E-1-1 to its outlet is approximately 2,400 feet.

The existing Sedco MDP Line D was designed and constructed in the mid-1980s. It was drastically undersized according to the Wildomar MDP study. The existing Line D daylight channel at the west of Mission Trail will need to be removed for Line E-1 construction.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line E-1 system is approximately $14,635,000.

Line E-2 Storm Drain System
The Line E-2 Storm Drain System is located south of the intersection of Mission Trail and Corydon Road. The proposed Line E-2 is a double-cell RCB which ranges from double 8’x6’ to double 8’x7’ RCB, with an approximate overall length of 2,150 feet. Line E-2 is intended to convey storm runoffs from Sedco Line E through East Lake developments to the open spaces.

Per the Wildomar MDP study, Sedco MDP Line E has a 100-year storm peak rate of 1318 CFS.

However, the portion of Sedco Line E constructed in 2004 was designed for 450 CFS. The existing Sedco Line E consists of a daylight channel, a segment of 149 feet of 72” RCP with bulkhead at the upstream end, and a 42” RCP lateral with 4 catch basins at Mission Trail and Lemon Street with total design capacity of 68 CFS.

Currently Corydon Street experiences severe flooding during rain storms, mainly due to the lack of drainage facilities. Only 5% of the 100-storm is conveyed through the existing Line E and its laterals, the bulk of the storm conveyance on Corydon Street is surface flow, which creates unsafe driving conditions.

At the request of the City, Webb provided an interim solution with 2 design options to alleviate Corydon flooding. The recommendations and exhibits are provided in Appendix X for reference.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line E-2 system is approximately $4,686,000. 4-50
Line E-3 Storm Drain System
The Line E-3 Storm Drain System is located in the Airport Use Area of the southeasterly corner of the East Lake Zone. Line E-3 consists of a single mainline storm drain. It varies in size from a 54” RCP upstream end to a 66” diameter RCP at its downstream, terminus within open space for a distance of approximately 1,500 feet. The Line E-3 watershed includes an approximate 24 acre drainage area from the City of Wildomar at the southeasterly area of Corydon Street.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line E-3 is approximately $958,000.

Line E-4 Storm Drain System
The Line E-4 Storm Drain System is located in the west side of the East Lake Zone, where the current land use is low to medium density residential. Line E-4 consists of a single mainline storm drain, which varies in size from a 48” RCP upstream end to a 66” diameter at its outlet. This area is surrounded by open space. The areas adjacent to open space can be graded to drain to the open space via surface flow. It is anticipated that land use will be modified in the near future. The proposed Line E-4 will need to be adjusted accordingly.

The estimated cost for the proposed Line E-4 is approximately $1,153,000.

A summary of the proposed facilities and their estimated cost is shown below.

Line E-1
Line E-2
Line E-3
Line E-4
Total
$ 14,635,000
$ 4,686,000
$ 958,000
$ 1,153,000
$21,432,000
Alternative Studies
The proposed Line E-1 and Line E-2, utilizing Reinforced Concrete Box culverts, are the most costly and also the most versatile systems. The alternatives of using concrete lined trapezoidal channels or earthen channels are examined and analyzed for their feasibility, both hydraulically and economically.
a. Concrete Lined Trapezoidal Channel
This alternative uses concrete lined open channels with channel side slope 1.5 to 1; base width 6’ to 20’ and depth 6’ to 7’. The open channels will have two maintenance access roads, one on each side of the channel, the estimate right of way requirements vary between 43’ to 75’ in width.

The channel will transition to a RCB of equivalent capacity where it crosses roadway. A total of 4 roadway crossings are assumed for the cost estimate comparison. b. Un-lined Trapezoidal Earthen Channel
The earthen channel will require 4:1 side slope and much wider bottom base width to achieve a non-erosive velocity. If earthen channels are used for Line E-1 and Line E-2, the bottom width of 4-51
the earthen channels will range from 30’ to 90’, the total width of the channel will need to be as wide as 190’. Conceptually, the earthen channel may provide opportunity for infiltration and biotreatment within the channel footprints, and be less costly. However, due to its width, it requires much longer transition structures at roadway crossings, and acquisition of more Right-of-Way.

A summary of the alternative studies is presented in the table below:

East Lake MDP Cost Alternative Summary
Wildomar
MDP
Alt 2 - Concrete
Trap Channel
Alt 3 - Earth
Channel 4:1 Required Add'l Imp East Lake MDP Alt 1 - RCB Bottom
Width
Bottom
Width Q100
(cfs)
Q100
(cfs)
Length Size
(ft)
Wildomar East Lake D D

MDP MDP
LINE E1-1
LINE E1
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
LINE A
LINE B
LINE C
LINE O
LINE D
248 Extend Line A & B to
Line C on Mission Trail
by Wildomar
222
237 688-784 2100 12'x6' 6 6
7 30
56 5.5

6.5 252 Extend Line O to Line D
1290 on Mission Trail
2249
1318
1515 1850
2400
2150
2-8'x7' 12
LINE E1
LINE E2
(Sum of Line A-D) 2426-2552
1318-1466
2-10'x8'
2-8'x7'
20 10
7 7
90 56
7 LINE E
LINE G

6.5 Extend Line G to Open
Space & grade to drain 1661 _
5228 451 Added 8500
R/W Take (ac)
R/W Cost

3.5 12.5 30.2
($100,000 /ac) $ 350,000 $
$
$
1,250,000
9,236,689
8,196
$ 3,020,000
11,806,000
10,476
Total Cost
MDP Fee
$ 17,136,561 $
$ 15,205 $
Alternative 1 are all RCB, may require less R/W take if alignment is within the roadway, assume 50% o fthe alignment within Street R/W Alternative 2 are concrete trap channel, assume roadway/ channel crossing at 4 locations, channel transition to RCB at crossings Alternative 3 are earth trap channel, assume roadway/ channel crossing at 4 locations, channel transition to RCB at crossings *East Lake Zone Total Area = 2751 Ac, Exclude Summerly Development and all Open Space Areas, Net Area = 1127 Ac Conclusions
The above alternatives and their associated costs were presented to the City Engineer and stake holders for consideration. Even though the open channel alternatives are less costly, they can be unsightly, aesthetically unpleasing, have a higher maintenance cost, less safe for the public compared to the underground facilities, and dissect the land and post more restrictions to the future developments. The City considers utilizing RCB for Line E-1 and Line E-2 as the most viable alternative for the East Lake Zone.

It is important to understand that the proposed East Lake MDP facilities alone will not adequately protect the area from flood hazards, unless either the upstream facilities per the Wildomar MDP are in place to collect and convey the storm flow to the designated connection points or the interim intercepting / collecting facilities are constructed to serve the same purposes. 4-52
Existing West Elsinore MDP and ADP
“West Elsinore Master Drainage Plan” and “West Elsinore Area Drainage Plan” were prepared by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), with the Area Drainage Fee approved in 1986 and updated in June 12, 1993. The drainage area covered by this MDP consists of approximately 10.5 square miles, where nearly 40% of the drainage area is within the City boundary. Currently, most of the MDP facilities are constructed, and areas within the city boundary are mostly developed, except the steep hillside area.

Figure 4-5
West Elsinore MDP
The MDP update does not propose any change to the existing West Elsinore MDP. However, since the ADP fee was last updated in June of 1993, an adjustment to the current construction cost index is warranted.

According to the Engineering News Record published Construction Cost (LA) Price Index Value, for September 2021, Index Value is 13,212.48; for June 1993, Index Value is 6,426.76. The increase on cost is 1.735. Therefore, ADP fee of $ 5,567/ac in 1993 will be adjusted to $ 11,445/ac as of September 2021.
4-53
SECTION 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Background
The primary purpose of the MDP update is to identify engineering solutions that will control flooding and drainage problems within the City. In addition, the MDP identifies potential locations for future water quality treatment facilities, estimates the cost of facilities, and identifies funding sources to facilitate orderly and economically-prudent development of the area.

This section serves as a general overview of the environmental setting of the MDP area as well as a review of some of the environmental analyses and documentation that may be required. The intent of this chapter is to inform the decision-making process of siting MDP facilities so that environmental constraints can be identified and ideally, avoided.

It should be noted that individualized analysis on a project-by-project basis pursuant to the regulations at the time, will be necessary once specific facility sites have been identified to determine the site-specific environmental constraints.

Aesthetics
The City’s most notable aesthetic resource is Lake Elsinore itself, a 3,000-acre natural lake. This large, shallow, natural Lake is the terminus of the San Jacinto River. As development in the region increased over the past 100 years, Lake Elsinore and the many hot springs around the Lake became popular recreation destinations. During the peak of initial settlement in the region and recreational development at Lake Elsinore, Federal and State agencies, as well as private groups stocked a wide variety of fish species in the lake with the goal of drawing people to Lake Elsinore by providing recreational fishing opportunities. The City’s aesthetic setting is characterized by urbanized development of various densities occurring within varied topographical features and interspersed with open space areas.

Scenic resources within and surrounding the City include the Cleveland National Forest (Santa Ana Mountains) that defines the westerly boundary with beautiful, rugged hillsides, canyons, and rocky outcroppings. Distant ridgelines of Mt. San Antonio and Mt. San Gorgonio as well as open space around Temescal Creek and the Gavilan Hills Plateau are aesthetically important.

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) currently identifies both Interstate 15 and State Route 74 as eligible for listing as State Scenic Highways, but they are not officially designated as such (Lake Elsinore General Plan FEIR).

Components of the proposed MDP could potentially affect scenic vistas and other scenic resources within the project area. The open channels, debris basins on the hillsides, and water quality basins could be visible and could have an effect on a scenic vista, which would require analysis and consideration. Although underground drainages would not be visible after construction is completed, construction debris, and construction equipment may temporarily affect the aesthetic quality of the immediate area. Therefore, depending on where future drainage facilities are located, there could be aesthetic impacts that would need to be evaluated on a project-by-project basis.
5-54
Air Quality
The proposed MDP area is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which encompasses all of Orange County and portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. The SCAB is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

The Climate Action Plan (CAP) is the City of Lake Elsinore’s long-range plan to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. The CAP identifies the activities in Lake Elsinore that generate greenhouse gas emissions, quantifies these emissions, and projects their future trends. It also describes local greenhouse gas emissions targets for the years 2020 and 2030, consistent with the State of California’s emission-reduction targets, as well as strategies and measures to meet these targets.

As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of air quality impacts and greenhouse gas emissions during both construction and operational phases may be needed.

Biological Resources
Approximately 16 different natural vegetative communities occur in the City and its SOI. In addition, 19 plants and a minimum of 38 animals within the City and/or the SOI’s habitats are accorded the “special status” designation because they are unique, have relatively limited distribution in the region, or have high wildlife value as defined by Federal, State, and local government conservation programs.

Lake Elsinore is a signatory to the Joint Powers Agreement that governs the Regional Conservation Authority that oversees the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The proposed MDP area is within the Elsinore Area Plan, Mead Valley Area Plan, and Lake Mathews/Woodcrest Area Plan of the MSHCP, including many portions within criteria cells. As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate projectspecific analyses of biological resources and project impacts during both construction and operational phases, may be needed. The proposed MDP zones contain MSHCP Criteria Cells, burrowing owl survey areas, and narrow endemic plant survey areas as shown in Figure 5-1.

Preparation of a General Habitat Assessment, MSHCP Consistency Analysis, Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report, Focused Surveys, Presence/Absence Surveys, and/or Pre-Construction Clearance Surveys may be required as the MDP is constructed, depending on the site-specific circumstances.

The proposed MDP area northeast of Lake Elsinore falls within the Stephens’ kangaroo rat (SKR) Fee Area outlined in the Riverside County SKR Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), which includes fees pursuant to County Ordinance 663.10 for the SKR HCP Fee Assessment Area as established and implemented by the County of Riverside.
5-55
Figure 5-1
MSHCP Criteria Cells and Survey Areas and SKR fee area
Cultural Resources
Archaeological resources are defined as the material remains of an area’s prehistoric (aboriginal/Native American) or historical (European or Euro-American) human activity.

Archaeological resources are recognized as non-renewable resources significant to our culture and are afforded protection by Federal and State law primarily through conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The Riverside County paleontological resources sensitivity mapping shows areas of high paleontological sensitivity (“High A”) in Quaternary deposits north of Lake Elsinore along the west side of the I-15 corridor (Figure 5-2). Another small strip of High A land is found along the I-15 corridor east of Lake Elsinore in the northeast portion of the East Lake Zone. The Temescal Wash Zone contains a large portion of this High A land. Geologic formations or mapped rock units in these areas may contain significant paleontological resources. These include rocks of Silurian or Devonian age and younger that have potential to contain remains of fossil fish, and Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocks that contain fossilized body elements and trace fossils such as tracks, nests and eggs.
5-56
Figure 5-2
MDP Zone with Paleontological Sensitivity
The City of Lake Elsinore has also identified geologic units that are known to contain important paleontological resources in the Alberhill Ranch area in the northwest portion of the City, and within the Temescal Wash Zone of the proposed MDP. In this localized area, the Silverado Formation of Paleocene age (approximately 66 to 55 million years old) is considered highly sensitive for invertebrate and plant material. The fossil plants from this unit have been studied for more than half a century.

Historical sites from mining, transportation, recreation, and ranching/homesteading sources are represented throughout the proposed MDP area. The number of previously identified historical sites is much smaller than prehistoric sites making it more difficult to determine areas of known or established sensitivity.

Construction and operation of any MDP facility would be required to comply with State law about accidental findings of human remains per State Health and Safety Code §7050.5. If human remains are encountered during construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code §5097.98. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are not historic, but prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendent for this area. Once the most likely descendent is determined, treatment of the Native American human remains will proceed pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98 (Lake Elsinore General Plan FEIR, RCIP).

As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of cultural resources and project impacts during both construction and operational phases, may be needed.

Compliance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), which requires tribal consultation may also be required.
5-57
Geology and Soils
The MDP area is located within a seismically-active region of California. Fault zones affecting the MDP area include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Elsinore, and Cucamonga Fault Zones. The following types of ground failure could occur within the City of Lake Elsinore, its SOI, and the proposed MDP area due to seismic activity: fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, lateral spreading, ground lurching, and seismically-induced ground settlement (Lake Elsinore General Plan FEIR).

The area also is susceptible to geologic hazards. Development along hillsides is particularly susceptible to landslides, as they are considered to be a basic geologic hazard for such development. Expansive soils are often associated with geologic units having marginal stability and can occur in low-lying alluvial basins, as well as along hillside areas. Such soils are known to exist in the City and its SOI and therefore may be present within the proposed MDP area. Soil corrosion is a complex phenomenon, with a number of variables involved. The City of Lake Elsinore requires testing for corrosive soils as part of the soils and geotechnical reporting demanded of all new construction projects. Subsidence is often caused by the overdraft of groundwater aquifers, and in the Elsinore Valley, subsidence has been attributed to groundwater pumping.

As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of geologic conditions and project impacts during both construction and operational phases, may be needed.

Project-specific geotechnical investigations would likely be required to provide design recommendations to construct with consideration of any geologic constraints.

Hydrology and Water Quality
The proposed MDP is within the San Jacinto River sub-watershed of the larger Santa Ana River watershed. The primary natural surface water features within the City planning area are Lake Elsinore, the San Jacinto River, and Temescal Wash. Railroad Canyon Reservoir (aka Canyon Lake)—a manmade facility— infrequently releases flows to the San Jacinto River, which then discharges intermittently into Lake Elsinore. During periods of high water elevations, Lake Elsinore discharges into Temescal Wash that flows north and eventually connects with the Santa Ana River.

The Elsinore groundwater basin is primarily supplied by infiltration of rainfall in the surrounding watershed. Other sources of inflow include infiltration along the San Jacinto River channel upstream of Lake Elsinore and agricultural and residential return flows. Municipal pumping for potable water is the only major outflow from the Elsinore groundwater basin.

A primary purpose of the proposed MDP is to outline engineering solutions to mitigate flooding in the City of Lake Elsinore and SOI. As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of hydrologic conditions and project impacts to water quality during both construction and operational phases, may be needed. Project-specific hydraulic and/or hydrology studies would likely be needed.

The State Water Resources Control Board, in compliance with Clean Water Act Section 303(d), maintains a list of impaired waterbodies. Lake Elsinore is listed due to the presence of four constituents: high nutrient levels from unknown point sources, organic enrichment/low dissolved 5-58
oxygen from unknown point sources, sedimentation/siltation from local urban runoff and storm sewers, and toxicity from unknown non-point sources. Fluctuating water levels in Lake Elsinore and algal blooms triggered by excess nutrients and low dissolved oxygen concentrations have impaired the ecology and recreational use of Lake Elsinore. The source of the sedimentation and siltation within the lake are from urban runoff and stormwater. According to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), improvement to the water quality in the lake can only be achieved through water quality monitoring and restoration programs. Some of the future MDP facilities are anticipated to ameliorate the ongoing water quality concerns in the Lake Elsinore watershed. As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of potential discharges of pollutants during both construction and operational phases, may be needed.

Wetlands
Wetland and riparian/riverine features in the study area include Lake Elsinore (located in the south-central portion of the City), the Temescal Wash, and the San Jacinto River. In addition, the area contains numerous smaller ephemeral drainages, washes, ditches, creeks, springs, areas of perched water and scattered vernal pools. Many of these resources are not located within MSHCP criteria cells and may or may not be associated with sensitive species and/or distinctive, “high-value” habitat. Wetland, riparian and riverine areas are addressed by the MSHCP, and regulated by the RWQCB, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Impacts to wetlands or Waters of the U.S./State from proposed MDP facilities should be minimized, if not avoided, to the extent practicable. Otherwise, permanent impacts to jurisdictional waterways that require regulatory permits would require mitigation. Determining adequate methods of providing mitigation should be done as early as possible in the project development process. Depending on the site, mitigation can be provided by local mitigation banks and in-lieu fee programs. Drainages and wetlands that may be subject to these regulations are shown in Figure 5-3.

Figure 5-3
MDP Zones with Wetland and “Blue Line” Streams
5-59
As each component of the MDP is designed, appropriate project-specific analyses of wetlands and/or riparian/riverine areas that may or may not be jurisdictional to regulatory agencies during both construction and operational phases, may be needed. In addition, jurisdictional delineations may be needed to determine the limits of regulatory oversight for impacts to Waters of the U.S. and/or Waters of the State.

Other Environmental Considerations
As each component of the MDP is constructed, consideration may be needed for one or more of the following topics during project design:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Agriculture and Forest Resources;
Hazards and Hazardous Materials;
Land Use and Planning;
Mineral Resources;
Noise;
Population and Housing;
Public Services;
Recreation;
Traffic and Transportation; and/or
Utilities and Service Systems.
5-60
References
City of Lake Elsinore, The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Adopted December 13, 2011. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/index.aspx?page=909, accessed on February 18, 2016.) City of Lake Elsinore, Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report, Certified on December 13, 2011. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/index.aspx?page=913, accessed on February 18, 2016.)
City of Wildomar, Draft General Plan Update, January 2015. (Available at http://wildomargp.org/, accessed February 18, 2016.)
County of Riverside, Elsinore Area Plan, November 2014. (Available at http://planning.rctlma.org/ZoningInformation/GeneralPlan.aspx, accessed February 18, 2016.) County of Riverside, Riverside County Integrated Project General Plan, Adopted October 7, 2003. (Available at http://planning.rctlma.org/ZoningInformation/GeneralPlan.aspx , accessed on February 18, 2016.)
County of Riverside, Riverside County Land Information System (RCLIS), (Available at http://mmc.rivcoit.org/MMC_Public/Viewer.html?Viewer=MMC_Public , accessed on February 18, 2016.)
Prepared by:

Albert A. Webb Associates Planning & Environmental Services Department Autumn DeWoody, Associate Environmental Analyst
Jillian Feyk-Miney, Assistant Environmental Analyst
5-61
SECTION 6 - COST SUMMARY AND FUNDING MECHANISMS
Cost Summary
Probable cost estimates were prepared as part of the MDP. A cost summary for the MDP facilities is shown in table below. The estimated costs were based on the ENR Index adjustment and 2021 Planning Cost Sheets of the District. The components of the cost include construction, right-ofway acquisition, 22% of lump sum items such as mobilization, water control, traffic control, etc., 12% of contingencies and 28% of combined engineering, administration and mitigation.

Lake Elsinore Master Drainage Plan Facility Cost Summary Administration,
Engineering,
Mitigation (28%)
Construction
Total
Debris Basin Right-of-Way
(2) (3) Zone Subtotal (1) Total(4)
Alberhill Sub Zone
Temescal Wash
Lake Zone
$ 44,734,005
22,164,010
23,070,480
16,418,696
$
$
$
$
12,525,521
6,205,923
6,459,734
4,597,235
$
$
$
$
57,259,526 $ 6,720,535 $ 2,020,215 $
$
$
$
66,000,276
31,135,562
32,421,846
21,431,931
$
$
$
28,369,933 $ 2,425,114
29,530,214 $ 1,966,631
$
$
$
340,515
925,000
East Lake Zone 416,000
West Elsinore
21,015,931 $ -
City Total $ 106,387,190 $ 29,788,413 $ 136,175,603 $ 11,112,281 $ 3,701,730 $ 150,989,614 (1) Cost based on RCFC&WCD 2021 Cost Project Planning Costs Worksheet (2) Estimated cost based on average from Lakeland Village MDP (3) $100,000 per acre Raw Land Cost for Right-of-Way cost (4) Total Construction Cost with Eng & Admin and Debris Basins The estimated costs for each zone or sub-zone are listed below:

East Lake Zone
MDP East Lake Zone Cost Summary
Facility Subtotal Debris Basin Right-of-Way Total
Line E-1
Line E-2
Line E-3
Line E-4
$ 14,334,822
$ 4,569,680
$
$
300,000 $ 14,634,822
116,000 $ 4,685,680
$ 958,377 $
$
958,377
$ 1,153,052 1,153,052
Total $ 21,015,931 $ - $ 416,000 $ 21,431,931
6-62
Alberhill Sub-Zone
MDP Temescal Wash Zone - Alberhill Sub-Zone Cost Summary Facility Subtotal
363,857
Debris Basin Right-of-Way Total
Line A01
Line A02
Line A03
Line A04
Line A05
Line A06
Line A07
Line A08
Line A09
Line A10
Line A11
(DB -1&2)/2 (1)
$ $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
363,857
3,653,329
892,208
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,720,342
892,208
$
$
707,987 $
$
225,000
24,535,817
17,649,039
1,882,036
496,326
4,830,047 1,748,700 31,114,564
17,649,039
1,882,036
496,326
4,942,342
1,677,064
1,731,813
368,682
4,942,342
1,677,064
1,731,813
368,682
$ 1,182,501 $ 46,515 1,229,016
Total $ 57,259,526 $ 6,720,535 $ 2,020,215 $ 66,000,276 (1) the Cost of Debris basins 1 & 2 is shared between Alberhill Sub-Zone and Temescal Zone Temescal Zone
MDP Temescal Wash Zone Cost Summary
Facility
Line T-1
Subtotal
3,869,694
Debris Basin Right-of-Way Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,869,694
5,412,255
1,723,459
195,547
Line T-2 5,412,255
1,723,459
195,547
641,847
518,613
291,522
432,133
12,802,781
2,482,083 $
$
Line T-3
Line T-4
Line T-5 641,847
Line T-6 518,613
Line T-7 291,522
Line T-8 432,133
Line T-9 12,802,781
2,651,514
1,225,883
1,370,316
Line T-10
DB -5
133,731 $ 35,700
258,300
46,515
967,583 $
(DB -1&2)/2 (1) $ 1,323,801 $
Total $ 28,369,933 $ 2,425,114 $ 340,515 $ 31,135,562
(1) the Cost of Debris basins 1 & 2 is shared between Alberhill Sub-Zone and Temescal Zone 6-63
Lake Zone
MDP Lake Zone Cost Summary
Facility Subtotal Debris Basin Right-of-Way Total
Line L-1 to L-5
Line L-6
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,268,771
1,235,007
2,308,851
534,736
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,268,771
1,235,007
2,308,851
534,736
Line L-7
Line L-8, L-9
Line L-10
Line L-11
Line L-12
Line L-13
Line L-14
Line L-15
Line L-16
Line L-17
Line L-18
Line L-19
Line L-20
Line L-21
Line L-22
Line L-23
1,342,502
1,300,098
1,251,734
1,139,857
3,339,916
937,746
1,342,502
1,300,098
1,251,734
1,139,857
3,739,916
937,746
$ 400,000
4,669,989
290,081
4,669,989
290,081
2,775,166
976,019
2,775,166
976,019
666,518 666,518
527,623 527,623
3,415,709
549,890
$ 1,966,631 $ 525,000 5,907,341
549,890
Total $ 29,530,214 $ 1,966,631 $ 925,000 $ 32,421,846
Debris Basin and Detention Basin
Drainage Drainage Debris R/W Area
(1)
Constr Cost Debris Basin R/W Cost Total Cost
Sytem
(name)
-
Area
(ac)
Vol
(ac-ft)

18.7 25.6

12.3 76.0

9.0 Total (2)
(name) ($)
DB1
(ac) ($100,000/ac) ($)
949 3.93

5.38 2.58

15.96 1.89

11.49 1.41

0.36 5.25

9.30 4.65
$
$
$
392,700 $ 1,078,340
537,600 $ 1,476,231
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,471,040
2,013,831
967,583
5,978,560
707,987
4,302,990
527,057
133,731
1,966,631
2,647,601
1,323,801
DB2 - 1425
DB5 - 822 258,300 $ 709,283
DB6 Line L14
Line A02
Line A04
Line A04
5133
362
$ 1,596,000 $ 4,382,560
189,000 518,987
$ 1,148,700 $ 3,154,290
DB8 $ $
DB9 1838
293

54.7 DB9A 6.7 $
$
$
$
$
140,700
35,700
$
$
386,357
DB10 Line T10-01 98,031
DB11 (3) Line L22
131 1.7
497 25.0

44.3 22.2
525,000 $ 1,441,631
93,030 $ 2,554,571
46,515 $ 1,277,286
(DB1 &2) (4) 2374
(DB1 &2)(0.5) 1187
6-64
(1) Estimated R/W needed based on average from Lakeland MDP at 0.21 acre per each ac-ft debris volume (2) Estimated cost based on average from Lakeland Village MDP dated in May, 2016. ENR Construction Price Index of

1.185 is used to adjust construction cost to September, 2021 (3) Estimated detention storage volume needed
(4) DE1 & DB2 cost to be shared by Alberhill Sub-zone and Temescal Wash Zone 50/50 ADP Fees
An area drainage fee is a financing mechanism used to offset taxpayer costs for proposed drainage facilities. The fees are imposed on new development within the plan area. The Subdivision Map Act and AB1600 requires that agencies imposing fees have a general drainage plan for the fee area, a special fund for the fees and an equitable distribution of the fees prior to implementation.

ADP fees are established using the MDP facility cost for each zone and distributed to the developing areas. The open spaces and areas already developed and build out or “near build out” are exclude from the ADP fee calculations.

Lake Elsinore Area Drainage Fee Summary
MDP Zone Area
Zone MDP Cost Total Area Drainage Fee (Acres)
Alberhill Sub Zone
Temescal Wash
Lake Zone
$
$
$
$
66,000,276
31,135,562
32,421,846
21,431,931
2272
2451
3340
1127
$
$
$
$
$
29,049
12,703
9,707
East Lake Zone
West Elsinore
19,017
11,445
City Total $ 150,989,614
GIS Data Base
Utilizing and developing the GIS data base is an integrated and essential part of the MDP developments.

Throughout the MDP update process, Webb’s GIS experts have been facilitating and supporting the MDP study effort. GIS Data Collector was created and utilized for geo-referencing locations and facilities of field investigation photos and field notes. A base map for the MDP was created utilizing City’s topographic contours, the Districts contours and GIS data base for parcels, General Plan Land Use and existing drainage facilities. 6-65
New feature classes for MDP boundaries, drainage fee areas, known drainage issue locations, and SD inlet locations were created and will be added to City’s Storm Drain geodatabase as a new Feature Dataset.

Additional Funding Sources
The Area Drainage Fees established hereon will be imposed on the development projects in connection with conditions of approval of the projects as the Drainage Mitigation Fee.

In addition to ADF, other funding sources maybe available to the community for flood protections, water quality mitigation and ground water recharge.

FEDERAL PROGRAMS
Economic Development Administration, Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program
“This program provides assistance to help distressed communities attract new industry, encourage business expansion, diversify local economies, and generate long-term, private sector jobs. Among the types of projects funded are water and sewer facilities, primarily serving industry and commerce; access roads to industrial parks or sites; port improvements; business incubator facilities; technology infrastructure; sustainable development activities; export programs; brownfields redevelopment; aquaculture facilities; and other infrastructure projects. Specific activities may include demolition, renovation, and construction of public facilities; provision of water or sewer infrastructure; or the development of storm water control mechanisms (e.g., a retention pond) as part of an industrial park or other eligible project.” Website: https://www.eda.gov/funding-opportunities/
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Mitigation Assistance Program This program has “the goal of reducing or eliminating claims under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).”
Website: https://www.fema.gov/flood-mitigation-assistance-grant-program Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program This program provides assistance to implement a sustained pre-disaster natural hazard mitigation program to reduce overall risk to the population and structures from future hazard events, while also reducing reliance on Federal funding in future disasters.

Website: https://www.fema.gov/pre-disaster-mitigation-grant-program 6-66
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Environmental Solutions for Communities The program supports “projects that link economic development and community well-being to the stewardship and health of the environment. This 5-year initiative is supported through a $15 million contribution from Wells Fargo that will be used to leverage other public and private investments with an expected total impact of over $37.5 million. Funding priorities for this program include: (1) supporting sustainable agricultural practices and private lands stewardship; (2) conserving critical land and water resources and improving local water quality; (3) restoring and managing natural habitat, species and ecosystems that are important to community livelihoods; (4) facilitating investments in green infrastructure, renewable energy and energy efficiency; and (5) encouraging broad-based citizen participation in project implementation.” Website: http://www.nfwf.org/environmentalsolutions/Pages/home.aspx U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants
“The objective of this program is to develop viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. Recipients may undertake a wide range of activities directed toward neighborhood revitalization, economic development and provision of improved community facilities and services.”
Website:
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopm ent/programs
U.S. Department of the Interior, Cooperative Watershed Management Program The goal of the program “is to enhance water conservation, including alternative uses; improve water quality; improve ecological resiliency of a river or stream; and to reduce conflicts over water at the watershed level by supporting the formation of watershed groups to develop local solutions to address water management issues.”
Website: http://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/cwmp/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water State Revolving Fund The fund “provides a permanent source of low-cost financing for a wide range of water quality infrastructure projects. These projects include municipal wastewater treatment and collection, nonpoint source pollution controls, decentralized wastewater treatment systems, green infrastructure, estuary management.”
Website: https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf
6-67

STATE PROGRAMS
California Department of Water Resources, Flood Control Subventions Program This program “provides financial assistance to local agencies cooperating in the construction of federally authorized flood control projects.”
Website: http://www.water.ca.gov/floodmgmt/funding/subventions.cfm California Department of Water Resources, California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1988
This program provides “loans and grants to water systems with projects that help to meet Safe Drinking Water Standards. Such projects include planning, water conservation, water loss detection, capital improvements, and corrosion control.” Website: http://water.ca.gov/grantsloans/grants/prop81sdw/index.cfm California State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program (CWSRF)
This program assists in financing projects which include, but are not limited to the construction of publicly-owned treatment facilities, such as: wastewater treatment, local sewers, sewer interceptors, water reclamation and distribution, storm water treatment, combined sewers, and landfill leachate treatment.

Website: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/grants_loans/srf/index.shtml California State Water Resources Control Board, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program (DWSRF)
This program funds the planning/design and construction of drinking water infrastructure projects including: treatment systems, distribution systems, interconnections, consolidations, pipeline extensions, water sources, water meters, and water storages.

Website: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/services/funding/SRF.shtml California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP) The program promotes the beneficial use of storm water and dry weather runoff by funding storm water and dry weather runoff projects advancing water quality and realizing multiple benefits from the storm water and dry weather runoff as a resource.
6-68
Website: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/grants_loans/swgp/ California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank) State Revolving Fund (ISRF) Loan Program
The program provides a loan program for infrastructure projects and economic expansion projects. Infrastructure projects include city streets, county highways, drainage, water supply and flood control, educational facilities, environmental mitigation measures, parks and recreational facilities, port facilities, power and communications, public transit, sewage collection and treatment, solid waste collection and disposal, water treatment and distribution, defense conversion, public safety facilities, state highways, military infrastructure, and goods movementrelated infrastructure.

Website: http://www.ibank.ca.gov/infrastructure_loans.htm

LOAN FINANCING PROGRAMS
Pay-as-you-go
“Under a pay-as-you-go approach, revenues from impact fees would generate funding for construction. Impact fees would be collected and deposited in a special fund until enough money accumulates to begin a construction project. The size of the construction outlay may make payas-you-go a difficult approach or, at a minimum, require project phasing and supplementary funding from other sources. A drainage fee per acre (developer impact fee) could be established for new development or redevelopment projects for this purpose. The impact fee amount would be regulated by Section 66000 of the California Government Code, which governs impact fees relative to not being more than the costs that can be attributed to each new user.” Assessment Districts
“Assessment Districts formed under the conventional statutes (Improvement Acts of 1911, Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915) provide some of the less costly financing available because of the real estate security. Assessment districts do not require a vote, but do require notice and a protest at a required hearing by more than 50 percent of the property owners within the proposed district can stop the proceedings. Assessment districts can be initiated by a petition of property owners or by City Council action. Only improvements that provide a special benefit to properties can be assessed to a property. Improvements that provide a general regional benefit to property outside the district would not be eligible to be included in an assessment district or would have to be funded by contributions outside the assessment district.” 6-69
SECTION 7 - CONCULSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the studies and investigations made for this report, it is concluded that:

1. The City of Lake Elsinore has experienced serious flooding problems in the past. As the City continues to urbanize, the risk of flood damage is expected to increase unless the flood protection and drainage facilities identified in the report are constructed in an orderly manner.

2. A drainage system is required to safely convey stormwater runoff through the City with the least interruption to public services. The MDP presented in this report is such a system and is deemed the most feasible of the alternatives studies.

3. The proposed MDP lends itself to staged construction as funds become available.

4. The proposed MDP offers a comprehensive long-term plan to provide stormwater facilities that are necessary to protect life and property from flood hazards in the City.

5. The total cost of the recommended improvements, including construction, right-of-way acquisition, engineering, administration, and contingencies is estimated to be $ 150,990,000.

It is recommended that: the Master Drainage Plan be updated and Area Drainage Fees for each MDP zone, as set forth herein, be adopted by the City Council and be used as a planning level guide for future developments in the study area.

Implementation of the above recommendations will provide the City of Lake Elsinore with a properly functioning storm drain system.

Future Growth of the City
Future growth of the City may be reflected in many aspects, such as an increase in the population; amendment of the approved specific plans; change of land use; change of development densities; filing and approval of the new specific plans and tentative tract/ parcel maps and expanding of the city boundary through the annexation process. Since this report is based on the current land use and city boundary, land use change and new annexations will have an impact on the MDP and ADF. When these impacts become significant, the City shall develop the ADF policies for the newly annexed properties or conduct a new MDP update or partial update to accommodate the changes.
7-70
Limitations
The hydrologic analysis presented herein has been prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the District. The design criteria established for this study were discussed with the City and pre-approved by the Interim City Engineer.

This document has been prepared at a level of detail appropriate for the scope of work. The methodology employed in the analysis was selected as suitable for the characteristic of the watershed; designated land use and proposed developments and existing drainage infrastructure.

Our field investigation identified current flooding issues and deficiencies. This report presents some short term solutions and future drainage improvements to alleviate flooding.

The MDP facilities described herein are conceptual in nature. The MDP provides a conceptual solution that addresses drainage problems within the City based on various engineering, environmental and economic considerations. By no means does the MDP represent the only feasible solution. The alignment and location of the facilities proposed in this report are general.

Precise facility locations will be dictated by conditions and other factors existing at the time of design. More detailed analysis performed at the design stage will determine final facility sizing.

The use of this document is limited to addressing the purpose and scope previously defined by the City of Lake Elsinore. The analyses presented in this report are not intended to be used for the detailed design. Webb shall not be held responsible for any unauthorized application of the report and the contents herein.

The opinions and conclusions presented in this report have been derived in accordance with the current standards of civil engineering practice, and from information and concurrence provided by the City of Lake Elsinore. No other warranty is expressed or implied. 7-71
APPENDIX A - Field Investigation Report
7-72

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MDP
Field Investigation Report
(CIP Project No. 120)
Prepared for:

Prepared by:

October, 2016
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION....................................................................................1-1 Methodology _________________________________________________________ 1-1 SECTION 2 - DRAINAGE ISSUES..............................................................................2-2

Drainage Issue Locations _______________________________________________ 2-2 Drainage Issue General Remedies________________________________________ 2-9 SECTION 3 - DRAINAGE INLETS AND OUTLETS....................................................3-1 Field Review _________________________________________________________ 3-1 SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................................4-1 ii
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
This field report for the Lake Elsinore Master Drainage Plan is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing drainage issues and drainage facilities located within the City of Lake Elsinore (City). The drainage issues include street and private property flooding, erosion, long-term ponding, drainage facility maintenance issues, and hillside runoff. The drainage facilities include City-owned storm drains and channels, Riverside County Flood Control District-owned storm drains and channels, homeowner association-owned basins, and the inlets and outlets associated with each. The field surveys and documentation provided in this report were collected from January to March 2015.
¢ Methodology
Most of the drainage issue locations and drainage facility locations were identified by City staff prior to the field surveys. The drainage issue locations were collected by City maintenance and engineering staff based on past resident complaints and prior knowledge and experience in the area. The type and location of various storm drain facilities are based on as-built plans in the City’s possession. The locations were input into an electronic map using GIS software to keep collected information easily accessible. During the field surveys, all notes and pictures were collected using the ArcGIS Collector mobile application. This application operates on any mobile phone or data-enabled tablet and uploads information to the GIS map in real-time.

All of the field surveys were conducted by at least one engineering staff member from Albert A.

Webb Associates (Webb) along with at least one engineering staff member from the City. 1-1
SECTION 2 - DRAINAGE ISSUES
¢ Drainage Issue Locations
Webb surveyed and documented approximately 79 drainage issue locations. These locations are characterized by any combination of street flooding, private property flooding, dirt or roadway erosion, long-term ponding, hillside runoff, and maintenance issues. Nearly all of the drainage issue locations are located between Interstate 15 and the northeast side of the lake.

The northeast side of the City is largely an older area and there are few to no storm drain facilities. There are also several hilly areas in the area that seem to exacerbate the flooding and runoff problems. Figure 1 shows the locations of observed drainage issues throughout the City.

Figure 1
City of Lake Elsinore Drainage Issue Locations
2-2
• Street Flooding. Street flooding in the City is primarily caused by low points in or near the street. Although the climate is relatively arid, water often remains in the street for days and even weeks after a rain event. This is especially true on gravel roads and on streets with low points in or near dirt shoulders.

Image 1
Street and shoulder flooding on Collier Avenue near Chaney Street Image 2
Street flooding on Lakeshore Drive at Matich Street
2-3
• Private Property Flooding. Private property flooding and water damage in the City mainly occurs near hills and in areas of low elevations. Water often flows down hills or streets and runs through or ponds in private property. This kind of flooding usually occurs when property is at lower elevations than the street or when the street is lacking curbs or berms to properly channelize the water.

Image 3
Private property at lower elevation than storm drain inlet on Heald Avenue Image 4
Street flow on Ellis Street drains down slope into property at lower elevation 2-4
• Erosion. Street and dirt erosion is most commonly found on streets with no curb or berm to properly channelize water. Water flows in the dirt at the edge of the street creating ravines. This water can get underneath the street and cause pavement damage. Erosion is also found wherever an undeveloped hillside meets a street. Dirt and debris from the hill are carried by the water and are deposited on downstream streets and property.

Image 5
Dirt shoulder erosion adjacent to pavement on Franklin Street Image 6
Dirt deposited at the low point at Main Street and Prospect Avenue 2-5
• Long-Term Ponding. Vacant lots and low-sitting gutter areas are susceptible to longterm ponding. Vacant lots are undeveloped and are generally at lower elevations than the surrounding streets and properties. Poorly designed, constructed, or maintained gutter facilities also lead to long-term ponding. Similar to flooded streets, ponding can last for days or weeks before completely evaporating. This can affect property access and require constant maintenance.

Image 7
Overflow culvert discharges into vacant lot and nearby properties on Gunnerson Street Image 8
Street low point in front of property at Sumner Avenue and Mohr Street 2-6
• Hillside Runoff. Runoff from the hills is one of the top drainage issues in the City. It contributes a high volume of water into the City and usually carries dirt and debris. Some hills are quite steep and the water runoff comes downstream with force. Dirt ravines and erosion are far more likely to occur in the presence of high-speed water. Efforts to slow or divert the hill runoff usually consist of sandbags which often break and require constant maintenance.

Image 9
Sandbag placement on Chestnut Street to slow down runoff and catch debris Image 10
Sandbag line on Bell Avenue to keep water from running into vacant lot 2-7
• Maintenance Issues. There are many locations that the City’s maintenance staff handles on a regular basis. The staff places sandbags in runoff areas near hills, vacuums problematic ponding areas, and clears runoff debris from streets and blocked storm drains. Maintenance of drainage areas is constant and never-ending. During the field surveys, staff noticed broken sandbags and blocked storm drains. The broken sandbags are a constant maintenance item due to breakage and other damage that occurs during rain events and daily use. The blocked storm drains seem to be neglected and have heavy buildup of dirt, debris, and unchecked plant growth.

Images 11 and 12
Storm drain outlets blocked with dirt on Pierce Avenue and on Collier Avenue 2-8
¢ Drainage Issue General Remedies
Most of the drainage issues occur from only a few causes. The most common causes of the surveyed drainage issue locations are low points on the street or property, lack of curbs and/or gutter facilities, unimproved land, and insufficient maintenance of existing facilities.

Street flooding is often caused by streets not having proper slopes and crowns. Some streets in the City were found to have low points within the traveled way. The slopes of the pavement can be improved by paving, but care should be taken to not simply put the water on the shoulder of the road. Water can often pond or erode dirt shoulders if not properly channelized.

The City uses a mix of asphalt concrete berm, curb, and curb/gutter combinations throughout the City to help channelize water that runs off of the street. However, many locations simply have dirt shoulders without any curb or gutter facility. This is leading to ponding, dirt erosion, and dirt runoff. Constructing berms, curbs, and gutters can help channelize the water along the street and towards storm drain facilities.

There are many vacant and unimproved lots and areas throughout the City. These unimproved lots contribute to dirt runoff during rain events and often leave gaps in curbs, gutters, and other drainage facilities when neighboring adjacent occupied properties. The City has been placing sandbags to keep water draining along the street, but it is a temporary solution that often fails.

More permanent solutions such as berms, curbs, and gutters can be added to these lots to assist in drainage. Also, the addition and preservation of grasses and other plants can reduce the amount of water runoff and dirt erosion from these areas.

As stated in the next section, a survey of all known storm drain inlets and outlets larger than 36” in diameter was conducted. Nearly all of the inlets and outlets surveyed had some kind of blockage due to excessive sediment, debris, foliage, or a combination of the three. It is clear that there was no regular maintenance for these facilities. An effort should be made to completely clear all of the blocked inlets and outlets as the blockages cannot be cleared on their own. In addition, regularly scheduled maintenance of the facilities should be done in order to keep the facilities operating as intended.
2-9
SECTION 3 - DRAINAGE INLETS AND OUTLETS
¢ Field Review
Webb surveyed and documented approximately 109 inlet or outlet locations throughout the City to verify size, location, and condition of each. Included in the survey are large culverts, weirs, inlets and outlets in basins, and storm drain channels. Regarding inlets and outlets, Webb only surveyed pipes 36” inches in diameter or larger to restrict the field review to only mainlines and large pipes. The inlets and outlets were found evenly throughout the City. Figure 2 shows the locations of surveyed inlets and outlets throughout the City.

Figure 2
City of Lake Elsinore Storm Drain Inlet and Outlet Locations • Inlets and Outlets. Most of the inlets and outlets surveyed consist of a 36”+ diameter pipe in a winged headwall configuration. The survey also found corrugated steel pipe inlets in basins, low-lying areas, and at ends of small storm drain channels. The condition of the inlets and outlets ranged from clean to completely blocked. As stated in the previous section, many inlet and outlet locations are not well maintained which leads to buildup of sediment and debris. The outlets also drain to a variety of different areas including basins, dirt channels, rivers, and surrounding low-lying areas.

Image 13
3-1
Outlet Headwall in the Links at Summerly Golf Course
Image 14
Inlet Headwall with Debris Blockage near Canyon Ridge Drive Image 15
3-2
Two Drain Inlets inside a Basin off Sugarbush Lane
Image 16
Corrugated Steel Pipe Outlet into Eroding Dirt Channel off Grunder Drive Image 17
3-3
Storm Drain Inlet Under Construction at End of Open Channel near Obaria Way Image 18
Storm Drain Inlet in a Detention Basin off Hermosa Drive 3-4
• Culverts. The survey found several large culverts throughout the City. Most consisted of multiple large-diameter pipes. The culverts are found underneath roadways or are part of overflow facilities in more remote locations. Most of the culverts are clear of debris with the few exceptions with some degree of blockage. The culverts may be better maintained than the inlets and outlets or experience less runoff.

Image 19
3x54” Culvert underneath Canyon Estates Drive
3-5
Image 20
3x48x96” Box Culvert underneath Grand Avenue
Image 20
Box Culvert underneath Collier Avenue with Sediment and Debris 3-6
• Weirs. The survey found many weirs in the City, most of which were overflow for basins. Two other weirs stood out during the field review based on their size. All weirs appeared to be in good condition.

Image 21
Overflow Weir on far side of Basin near 3rd Street
3-7
Image 22
Large Overflow Weir in McVicker Canyon
Image 23
Large Overflow Weir atop Culvert near Canyon Hill Community Park 3-8
• Basins. There are many storm water basins throughout the City. Most of the basins are located in newly-developed residential areas where storm water treatment is required.

Nearly all of the basins are HOA-maintained. Generally, the basins include an inlet, an outlet drain at higher elevation, and an overflow weir. Some of the basin inlets utilized concrete velocity-reducing structures to reduce erosion while others utilized concrete sediment trap basins. The basin outlets were usually vertical corrugated steel inlets which allowed storm water to be stored in the basin until it reached the top of the outlet.

Many of the basins are clearly lacking routine maintenance as trees and an abundance of other vegetative growth and debris have propagated in the basins. Routine maintenance by the HOA or the City should be completed to keep the basins clear and effective during storms.

Image 24
Concrete Inlet Structure into Basin near Acanthus Drive 3-9
Image 25
Raised Corrugated Steel Outlet Structure in Basin near Acanthus Drive Image 26
Concrete Sediment Trap Inlet Structure in Basin near McVicker Canyon Park Road 3-10
• Channels. Most of the channels in the City are large structures built by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD). All of these channels drain into or towards Lake Elsinore. The channels are either dirt-lined or concrete-lined.

Most of the channels are clear of debris. Some sediment and debris blockage can be found near some of the inlets and outlets of the culverts. Figure 3 shows the locations of the RCFCD lines.

Figure 3
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distrct Facility Locations 3-11
Image 27
Sediment Buildup at Culvert Outlet at Grand Avenue
Image 28
Clean Trapezoidal Channel at Grand Avenue
3-12
Image 29
Dirt and Rock-Lined Channel at Lehr Drive
Image 30
Open Channel Area at Channel Split near Minthorn Street 3-13
Other Facilities. Two unique storm drain facilities were documented during the course of the surveys. A rubber dam system was found in the Outlet Channel near Minthorn Street and Wasson Channel at the high point of the Outlet Channel. Its purpose is to direct the EVMWD recycled water either discharges into the Lake or to the Temescal Wash for maintaining the water level of the Lake. This rubber dam system can be inflated or deflated, and is a dry weather recharging system, not intended for flood control purposes.

In addition, a large steel door (roughly 120” in diameter) covering a storm drain outlet was found near Lakeshore Drive. It is thought that the door is to prevent high water in the channel from flowing into the outlet pipe. The steel door may also force water to drain slowly out of the outlet to reduce erosion in the San Jacinto River outlet area.

Image 31
Rubber Dam in Channel near Minthorn Street
Image 31 A
Rubber Dam in Outlet Channel near Minthorn Street
3-14
Image 32
Large Steel Door on Outlet near Lakeshore Drive
3-15
Image 33
RCFCD Arroyo Del Toro Channel near I-15 and Riverside Drive 3-16
SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATIONS
Throughout the field surveys, it was increasingly obvious that routine maintenance of the storm drain facilities, in general, was not being adequately performed. Many drainage issues could be remedied or helped with proper maintenance of existing facilities. Even some HOA-maintained facilities show a lack of regular, if any, maintenance. Full-grown trees and foliage can hide the inlets and outlets and make it impossible to see the bottom of the basin. A plan and schedule for regular maintenance by the City and/or HOAs should be in place and followed to ensure proper performance of drainage facilities.

Regular maintenance of the facilities will not be enough, however. During the survey, many of the hillsides were almost barren with some freshly scarified. Much of the blockages in the facilities are caused by runoff dirt and sediment. The dirt and sediment will quickly return if the hillsides do not have enough vegetation to hold the dirt. The City should allow foliage to grow on the hillsides to reduce the runoff water and sediment that reaches the storm drains.

Streets with and without curb/dike should be inventoried to determine which streets would benefit from channelizing water along the street instead of the shoulder. Dirt shoulders easily erode and can cause damage to the pavement of the streets. Eroding dirt shoulders also contribute to sediment runoff. Channelizing the storm water along the streets can more efficiently direct storm runoffs into storm drain facilities.

Frequent flooding areas on the street or in private property should be more thoroughly researched on a case-by-case basis to determine cost-effective means of providing relief.

Implementation of the above recommendations will provide the City of Lake Elsinore with a properly functioning storm drain system.
4-1
MDP-City Wide Drainage Issues
Flooding Ex. Storm Drain
No. Location Primary Issue Remarks Mitigation Measure Photo ST PP Debris SD CB Cond.

Possible costco fixing with sd. Intersection and dirt shoulders are very flat. 1
2 3rd St / Dexter Ave Y Street flooding flooding entire intersection. nearby development. shoulder grading Y Y
Ponding on street from street and hill runoff. CB on other side of street. Need to Add berm or C&G to direct water to a new CB that links into Line St / Lakeshore Pepper / Dawes
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Standing water
Standing water
Standing water
catch and redirect. Long term ponding at intersection existing CB and SD across the street LP T-junction, standing water on street, long term ponding. T-intersection taking runoffs btwn Ave 3 to Ave 6. Pond till spill to Lakeshore 3 4 Need major storm drain facility Y
Y
Y
LP T-junction, standing water on street, long term ponding. 6" or 8" SD outlet not found, not in working condition High St / Parkway Need major storm drain facility Need major storm drain facility Hillside runoffs sheet cross street flooding property. Runoffs erode road, cross yard drain to Lakeshore 5
6 Country Club / Mill St
Mill St / Ave 1

Y Y Y N N
N
Hillside runoff, Street flooding
Hillside runoff, Street flooding May need SD facility. Excessive dirt may require high maintenance
May need SD facility. Excessive dirt may require high
maintenance
Hillside runoffs flooding St & PP with silt and debris Y Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
7 N
8 9
Mill St / Ave 2 Hillside runoff, Street flooding
Other
Hillside runoffs flooding St & PP with silt and debris
homeowner built rip rap and grading. None to little flooding No C&G
Strickland Ave / Foster St
E/S Spring / N/O Sumner Low area near street. Add berm or C&G and CB to join ex SD nearby on Sumner
Add berm, C&G, or concrete dike to collect water and divert to new SD
Street flooding Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
10 11
Lakeshore / Elm to Country club
Marian / Lakeshore to End
Street flooding Street very flat, unsafe driving cond.

Runoff from Lakeshore eroding edge of pavement and affecting two homes on Berm or C&G to direct water away from edges of street. CB Y Road and PP Damage Marian and SD to collect water before it reaches homes Lake Park St / Flooding houses on
Herbert St
Possible high point(s) on Lake Park street stops water from flowing to lake. Grading may allow water to continue 12 13 14
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N N
Y
N
PP Damage Runoff from Lakeshore goes down Lake Park Street and flows into 3 backyards Street flooding at school site. 18" outlet to bubbler CB, debris at inlet of 18" RCP, pond over sidewalk, unsafe
Mass silt & debris drain to inlet. 30" SD on Mill, 1/3 inlet silt up. Hillside and Ave 7 erosion
Y
Y
W/O 1331 Mill St - Drain
E/O 1341 Mill St / Ave 7
Y
Y
18"
30"
Street flooding
Hillside runoff
Extend and conn. Exist 18" to SD Main on Mill
Need desilting facility & imp on Ave 7
Ave 6 upstream runoffs drain downhill near Cole, erode natural channel outlet at Mill. Causes erosion and downstream flooding 15
16 17
Ave 6 at Cole Ave Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
Add C&G on Ave 6, use street convey the runoffs
Need x-gutter and C&G on south of Acacia
Y
Y
Y
Acacia / Country club
Chestnut / S/O Prospect
Y
Y
Runoff from hillside flood house. Skewed T intersection Runoff from EVMWD street. crosses street, heavy silt and flooding goes to Prospect and Main. May need to catch or redirect at source and at Main Y Need to catch or redirect runoffs at source and at Main 18 19
1209 Sumner Y
Y
Standing water
Standing water
HIGH PRIORITY. Deep ponding. Cross gutter or undersidewalk drain CB and inlet located poorly. Silt on street
Need to install cross gutter or undersidewalk drain
Dutton St / Mid block area New catch basin at low points 20 339 Chestnut Y Y Y Street flooding
Other
Street is steep and has no drainage facilities. Water runs into PP and ponds New CB and SD to catch water before it leaves Franklin street Water running down street into single CB. SD only from end of Pottery to FC channel
Runoff and ponding and flooding. No development in near future. Vegetation to take care of silt.

More CBs and SD on Pottery street to lessen amount of water that reaches last CB. 21a
21b
Pottery - Main St / Rancho
Pottery - Main St / Rancho
Y
Y Y Y
Y
Hillside runoff
21c
22 Pottery - Main St / Rancho
N/S Flint - Lookout / Main St
Standing water
Hillside runoff
Water running down sides of street. 1 CB at end of street. paving soon Runoff into PP lowspot, ponding
Add C&G to keep water moving on Pottery to CB.

Add berm or C&G to keep water from PP
Y
Y
Flooding Ex. Storm Drain
No.
1 Location Notes Remarks Mitigation Measure Photo
ST PP Debris SD CB Cond.

Both sides flooding. Low spot in street. Channel dump onto street. Nearby flood control facility Street flooding Install catch basins at low point and add storm drain Y Y
18740 Collier-Both sides of the road
E/S Collier / N/O Crane - by bus stop
Y
Perform maintenance to clear out channel and pipes. It may be possible that former channel is completely filled in with dirt.
25 Y
Y
Y
Y
Standing water Water from channel ponds on driveway/street. Trees and dirt fill in channel 26 27
565 Chaney - area in front
Trelevn / Chaney
Standing water
Hillside runoff
Street and land runoff onto street. Can continue existing berm Goes through PP and ponds behind berm
Extend existing berm Y
Y
Road is flat. Runoff from hills can be caontrolled and captured with CB and SD. 28
29 30
Gedge - Strickland / Gutakes Y
Y
Y
Street flooding
Hillside runoff
Standing water
Runoff from Chaney Y
Y
Y
Chaney - W/S Strickland / Hill St Y Runoff down Chaney street from unimproved areas. Ponding and dirt debris High ponding. May need CB. CG same height as crown. Possible existing SD SD and CB on Chaney down to RCFC channel to north
May need maintain existing SD and add catch basins Lakeshore / Lowell in turn pocket 31 32
33 Hillside runoff
Street flooding
Street flooding
No berm. Water runs into dirt and silt builds up on street.

Ponding in street with dirt
Add berm, cross gutter. May need CB.

Use berm and cross gutter.

Y
Y
Y
W/S Davis / N/O Lakeshore
Lakeshore - Davis / Matich Y
Y Runoff from hills with dirt. Use berm and inlets. Damaged existing drain pipe Repair existng storm drain and add berm and inlets Bushman / Lakeshore May need major storm drain facility or series of small drains on north side.

Determine if another CB needed on other side of Cowell or on Ryan Ave to reduce volume of water
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 Y
Y
Street flooding
Hillside runoff
Runoff from hills. Lakeshore Dr can flood due to lake of SD and flatness Lakeshore - Bushman / Illinois Cowell - Lakeshore / Lakeview
Manning - Ryan / Lakeshore
Runoff from hills and steep street towards lake. Existing CB on one side at Lakeshore. Dirt runoff.

Runoff from hillside and street street bringing dirt and debris. Water cuts across street and creates dirt ravine on west side.

Runoff from hills and steep street. Runs near/on PP and then down Illinois.

Water ponds at Illinois and Lakeshore.

Y Y
Hillside runoff Add berm or C&G and CB at bottom of street. Cross gutter Continue berm around to Lakeshore. Remove low spot from street corners.

Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Hillside runoff, ponding
Hillside runoff
Illinois - Lakeshore / Lakeview
Heald / Adams Water from street flowing into PP. Culvert under street. CB not at low point Water flowing down street and into PP and ponding.

Need to change street grade or add CB at low point
Add berm or C&G to keep water from homes. Add CB and link to existing CB and SD down the street. Y Y Standing water Hillside runoff
Heald - W/O Chaney to 1st house
Water runs into open space and into multiple PP. Overside drain on Bailey.

Remove and bring water to Dryden Y
Y
May need major storm drain facility 12792 Lash - runoff from hillside 16801 Holeborrow
16809 Bell
41 42
43 N
N
Y
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
Street flooding
Runoff hill into PP May need major storm drain facility May need major storm drain facility
May need major storm drain facility
Runoff down hill into PP
Pope circle area Y Flooding street, land, PP, about two feet. Deep flooding for weeks Runoff down street into low basin areas. Possible overside drain and berm into low area to slow down water. 44
45 46
N
N
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
May need major storm drain facility
May need major storm drain facility
May need major storm drain facility
LaShell - Pinnell / Bromley
Bromley north to LaShell
Robert / Shrier
Silt and water run down dirt road
Related to uphill runoff on LaShell
Overflow from basins floods road about 1 foot deep. Whole street flooded.

Floods PP. 47 Shrier / Gunnerson Y Y Street flooding
Standing water
May need major storm drain facility Y
48 49
McBride / Gunnerson
Herbert St area
Y
Y
Y
Y
Runoff from streets and hills ponding on street. Crosses street to PP Same issues as Gunnerson points
May need major storm drain facility
May need major storm drain facility
Y
X
Flooding Ex. Storm Drain
No. Location Notes Remarks Mitigation Measure Photo
ST PP Debris SD CB Cond.

Runoff from hill down street and into PP. Needs infrastructure improvements before much can be done 50
51 Bennett St area N Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
Y
Ingalls Cir - spill way along road edge Y Slight ponding on street. Roadway damage Overside drain needs replacement with rip rap. Y Ponding on street. Inlet on street may be clogged. Outlet clogged. May need clearing and rip rap. Maybe size upgrade 52
53 54
McPherson / Pierce
29235 Gunder
Y
N
N
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
Hillside runoff
May need unclogg existing inlet and outlet
Y Install CB and drain to Valley. Repair dike Y
Y
Water runs down hill, across street, into PP.

Berm or C&G to direct water downhill towards SD on
Lakeshore Lash / Dryden Water running down hill and across street into PP Berm or C&G to direct water downhill towards SD on
Lakeshore 55
56 57
Dryden between Lash / Cimaron St N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Hillside runoff
Street flooding
Water running down hill and across street into PP
Channel running into streets. Flooding PP. Flooding street. Street is low point.

Cross gutter and channel improvements 29700 Hursh May need to add cross gutter and improve channel 31625 Machado near guard rail Low point and flat street. Clean shoulder to allow for flow. Street taper cause ponding. Maintenance issue Standing water Y
Y
RCFCD Line C in Le Gaye, Machado and Joy, may need to add catch basins and inlets Machado / LeGaye
32137 Machado
58 59
Y
Y
Y
Y
ponding
Y
Y
Standing water Same issue as other Machado. Ponding in low spot at street taper Exist. SD 500' west, widening st 350' or add SD & CB Low pt. at Street, no CB, Need to add SD and CB Hillside runoffs flooding PP and ST. Erosion from hillside and road runoff. Can use SD or curb 60a
60b
60c
Franklin-Easthill to Ave. 6
Franklin-Easthill to Ave. 6
Franklin-Easthill to Ave. 6
Y
Y
Y
Hillside runoffs
Hillside runoffs
Hillside runoffs
Y
Y
Hillside runoffs flooding PP and ST. Erosion from hillside and road runoff. Low pt. at Street, no CB, Need to add SD and CB Low pt. at Street, no CB, Need to add SD and CB Hillside runoffs flooding PP and ST. Erosion from hillside and road runoff.

Development soon. Offramp and businesses.

Property flooded by culvert
discharge
2-24" Culvert, Rip-Rap at outlet, Storm runoff spreading and flooding the property 61 Corydon at Melinda Lane Y Y Y 2-24" N G Channelize downstream from the culvert Y After an approved project PM 36551 constructed,
ponding will be resolved. Pavement should be
repaired
Ponding at knuckle leads to heavy debris and pavement damage.

Pavement shows aligator cracking and failure in area. 62 3rd St / Pasadena Y Y Ponding at Knuckle Drainage ditch and culvert discharges runoffs to
63 Olive / Mission Trail Y Y Drainage ditch and inlet at Wildomar side need to be maintained private property. Both cities to look into cleaning responsibilities
Natural watercourse from hill site runs through
property. Need to grade channel to Bushman, add
berm to protect property. Rita email 11/24/15
Maybe grade a berm to prevent flooding the site
per Rita's email 12/16/15
Hillsite runoffs and street
above 64 17770 Ryan near Bushman
Stoneman St/ Palomar St
Y
Y
N N
Y
Property flooded by the runoffs from hillsite and street above Source from RCFC Stoneman Channel
Y
65 Y Y
Y
RV Park Site flooding
Pepper Tree RV Trailer Park
Corydon Flooding between Mission
Trail and Melinda Lane
Heavey rain in 1-2016 caused Due to lack of upstream facilities and existing SEDCO Line E was servere flooding not fully utilized
See Memo and interim improvement options and
cost estimate
66 Y
Memorandum
To: Jason Simpson, Financial Manager, City of Lake Elsinore From: Lin McCaffrey, P.E. Albert A. Webb Associates
Date: January 25, 2016
Re: Corydon Road Flooding Issues
Corydon Flooding Issues and Interim Solutions
During the rain event first week of January, 2016, a section of Corydon Street between Mission Trail and Melinda Lane adjacent to the City of Lake Elsinore easterly boundary experienced a heavy flooding. Webb has reviewed the area topographic map, existing drainage facilities in conjunction with Prelim Wildomar MDP hydrology information, and conducted a preliminary drainage studies and design options. Below are our findings and recommended storm drain improvements:

Findings:

1. There are approximate 1700 acres watershed (Wildomar Line E and Line G) from Wildomar drains cross Corydon Street, discharges into the Lake.

2. The watershed is partially developed with mostly residential, some commercial land use and 30% to 40% of the vacant land.

3. Wildomar MDP Q100 for Line E is 1,318 CFS, for Line G is 1,661 CFS (fully developed condition), total Q100 is approximate 3,000 CFS.

4. Except Caltrans Storm Drain Culverts on I-15, SEDCO Basin and Line F at east of I-15, the only existing drainage facility is SEDCO Line E, a 72” RCP, a 42” RCP on Mission Trail and daylight channel with a design capacity of 450 CFS.

5. The existing Line E collecting system has 4 catch basins at east side intersection of Mission Trail and Lemon Street with estimated capacity of 100 CFS. The existing Line E is most likely under-utilized for the currently conditions.

6. Due to lack of upstream collecting system, increase capacity of Line E or construct portion of Line G will not effectively alleviate Corydon flooding.

Recommendations:

1. Fully utilize the existing Line E capacity by adding additional catch basins and drainage inlet on Corydon.

2. Construct a storm drain system on Corydon with catch basins and inlets to reduce the flooding. Two interim design options are provided pending on the funding and preferred storm drain outlet location and alignments. See Exhibits Option 1 and Option 2. The estimated cost for the Option 1 and Option 2 are approximately $794,000 and $973,000 respectively.

OPTION 1
Location
Prop. SD
Dia Length (ft)
Corydon St 30" 149
Corydon St.

Corydon St.

Cereal St
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
36" 483
30" 163
30" 217
48" 909
"Laterals" from Inlets and CB's 382
OPTION 2
Location Dia Length (ft)
48" 151
36" 386
42" 480
48" 612
30" 149
30" 483
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Prop. SD
Corydon St.

Corydon St.

Easement to Airport
Cordyon St
Corydon St.
"Laterals" from Inlets and CB's 733
Exist. CB
Exist. Concrete
Channel
Exist. 42" RCP
SEDCO Line "E" LEGEND
City Boundary
Proposed Facilities
Inlet
Exist. Catch Basin
72" RCP Existing RCFC&WCD Facilities
I
0 250 500
Feet
1 inch = 250 feet
Corydon Road
Drainage Improvement
OPTION 1
City of Lake Elsinore
Sources: RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015;
Eagle Aerial, 2012.

Exist. CB
Exist. Concrete
Channel
Exist. 42" RCP
SEDCO Line "E"
LEGEND
City Boundary
Proposed Facilities
Inlet
Exist.
72" RCP Catch Basin
Existing RCFC&WCD Facilities
I
0 250 500
Feet
1 inch = 250 feet
Corydon Road
Drainage Improvement
OPTION 2
City of Lake Elsinore
Sources: RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015;
Eagle Aerial, 2012.

APPENDIX B – Exhibits
7-73
LEGEND
Map Grids
B1 East Lake
Lake
Temescal Wash
Alberhill Sub-Zone
City Boundary
Proposed City MDP
Existing City Lines >20"
A1
A2
A3
a ?¦ !"
B2
C1
B3
C2
Grid Index Map
I
B4
0 3,000 6,000 9,000
Feet
LEGE ND Proposed City MDP Facilities Proposed City MDP Basins Proposed Debris Basin Locations
Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing RCFC Facilities
"
Proposed RCFC Lines Existing CalTrans Drainage Facilities

RCP, APC, CSP, RCB
RCFC Ditch Basins Proposed Roads
Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Lake
East
Alberhill Sub- Zone
Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
DB1" DB2"
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels City Alberhill Boundary Ranch SP
OS
R/W

OS- N OS
I 15

R/W MXU MXU P OS

MFR C- SP R/W
SFR

MXU SFR OS

LDR MFR
R-3 HDR
MXU Q=70 P MXU SFR

LDR MFR
R/W
HDR

OS SCH OS SFR
P
SCH OS
MFR JHS PK Alberhill ES/P "D Villages SP
B8 CH LDR

SFR MXU
SFR
Alberhill MDR
Ridge TTM Alberhill Ranch SP OS HDR R-SF

L L OS MDR HDR
OS OS
OS P

OS- N MFR LDR I SFR PK
SFR
OS 0 600 1,20
0 1,80
0 HR P
01 Fee
t
6- 05-0 ineA OS MDR L Grid A1 Alberhill North
RCD OS RC 36"
P MFR C-1 DB9 A"

MXU SFR SFR
OS PW R-M Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside
HDRMurdock Alberhill Ranch SP Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP
Imagery, 2014. SFR MFR MXU
OS
SFR C-1
SFR Alber hill
OS RCD OS Ridge TTM SFR MFR MXU HDR
Alberhill Villages SP
OS
R/W Alberhill Ranch SP Alberhill Ranch SP CH
SFR Alberhill Villages SP Alberhill R-SF Murdock Ranch SP Alberhill Ranch SP C-H CHR OS PKS SP
R-3

P PKS R-M
SFR
"DB9
MDR
OS
Line A08
Alberhill Villages SP
Outlet Center SP
RUNNING DEER RD Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP
L
in Q=138
.8
54"
eT
02 MOUNTAI N ST Q=175
48" Q=9
8 Cape of Good 42"
Hope SP .3
"
01 TR 36557 Q=1
36 !.

SPRUCE ST
HARRISON !.

AVE
!.
!. !.

RIDGEDR NT CE CRES !.

La Laguna Estates SP !. !.
!.

LEGE ND
!.
!. !. !. Proposed City MDP Facilities
SPINDRIFT CIR !. !.

Proposed City MDP Basins
Proposed Debris Basin Locations
Drainage Issue Locations
Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing RCFC Facilities
" !. !.
!. !.
!.

Proposed RCFC Lines Existing CalTrans Drainage Facilities

RCP, APC, CSP, RCB
Ditch
!.
!.
!.

CAMPHOR WAY Lakeshore RCFC Village SP Basins !.

IRONWOO Proposed D ST
Roads
Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Lake
!.

East Lake 0
!.
600
!.I
1,20
0 1,80 Alberhill Sub- 0
Zone
Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
!. Fee
t Grid A2 South Alberhill/
!.

SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
West Lake Area
!.

Sources: City of Lake 2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & Elsinore, 2014 & City 2015; Riverside Boundary Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP Imagery, 2014.

The Village at Lakesho
re
Lakela ndVillag
e
LEGE ND Proposed City MDP Facilities Existing City Storm Drain Facilities Existing RCFC Facilities
Proposed RCFC Lines
RCFC Basins
Proposed MDP Zones Temescal Wash
Lake East Lake 0 600
I
1,20 01,80 Watershed 0
Subareas
10-ft Contours
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
Fee t Grid A3 West
Sources: City of Lake Lake Area 2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & Elsinore, 2014 & City 2015; Riverside Boundary Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP Imagery, 2014.

I LEGE NDProposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Lake
0 600 1,20
0 1,80
0 Fee
t Grid North B1 City Area
East Lake Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
Parcels
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside
Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP
Imagery, 2014.

City Boundary

MOUNTAIN AVE
FIG ST
I LEGE ND Proposed City MDP Facilities
0 600 1,20
0 1,80
0 Proposed City MDP Basins
Proposed Debris Basin Locations
Drainage Issue Locations
Fee
t Grid B2 North City Area
"
!.

Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing RCFC Facilities
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside
Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP
Imagery, 2014. Proposed RCFC Lines Proposed Wildomar MDP Facilities Existing CalTrans Drainage Facilities

RCP, APC, CSP, RCB
Ditch RCFC Basins Proposed Roads
Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash

CIR KOUT
LOO
Lak
eEast Lake Alberhill Sub- Zone
Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
DB10 " MAURICI O ST
42" RCP
City
OS Alberhill Boundary Ranch SP ¦
TR 25476
"
C- SP DB5
TR 25479
TR 30698
Outl et
!.

Center SP GAFFEY DR RAMSGAT

TR E SP
11283
TTM 32537 TR 25478
TR 31792
Tuscany Hills SP DB1 "1
Ramsgat e SP (TTM 35422) -16
ineL L
TR
!. 31593
!.
!.

DB6"

1. 13
1 Q=
42RCP " TR 31593 "South Shore I" (with proposed lots)
Ramsgat e SP
!.

LA !. STRADA
!.

Spyglass Ranch SP (TR 35337) Canyon Creek SP (with proposed lots) LO

DESANTEL
!. L
!. TR 36567 (South Shore II)
(with proposed
lots)
-18- 2 Line L
!. !. !.

POTTERYST
L
in !. eL-6 !.
!. !.
' !.
!. POTTERYST
!.
!
"
!.
!.
'
!. !.

Q=85
36"R
C
P !. !.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.

LEGE ND !. PECKST Proposed City MDP Facilities
Proposed City MDP Basins
Proposed Debris Basin Locations
Proposed WQ Treatment Facilities
Drainage Issue Locations
DR ' !. IDG
R
E
DDLE
SA LIMITEDAVE !. " Canyon ' !. Creek SP
!. !.

Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing RCFC Facilities
!. MILL ST !. !. !.
!. !. Proposed RCFC Lines PARK !. !. WAY Proposed Wildomar MDP Facilities GC Existing CalTrans Drainage Facilities

RCP, APC, CSP, RCB
Ditch
!. !.

OS
MDR LMR !. !. Q=
18 1 Elsinore City Center
48 MDR MDR RM " R
CP !. RCFC MDR HDR
Basins
HDR HDR !.

HDR HDR East Proposed Lake SP Roads
Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Lake
' F MDR OS HDR
RM
' !. RM
MDR
RM

RM MDR RM I
OS'
OS OS

MDR MDR
RM
OS RM
OS RM 0 600 1,20
0 1,80
0 OS
East Lake TC Fee
t Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
Grid B3 North Lake Area
LMR
LMR Diamon East d SP
Lake SP
GC
TC
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP Imagery, 2014.

OS
LMR
OS
OS R
LMR
LM OS
R
Diamon
d SP
MDR R
CM
TC
LM
R
LM
R LMR
LM
R OS
LMR
LM

R GC LMR OS
LM
R OS
LM

R LM LMR R
OS
East Lake SP
(Summe
rly)
LM
R
LMR LM

R HD OS R MD
LM R
R OS
OS East Lake SP MD
R
LM
R MD
R
LM
R
LMR HD
R
HD
R OS
LM
R
PI MD
R
HD
R
LM GC
R
LM
R
LMR
MD
R
LM

R HD MD R
R
HD
R
LM
R LI
LI
AUA
OS

LEGE ND
LI
Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Proposed City MDP Facilities Proposed City MDP Basins
Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing RCFC Facilities
Proposed RCFC Lines
Proposed Wildomar MDP Facilities
RCFC Basins
Lak
eEast Lake
AUA East Lake SP Land Use
Floodway Airport Use Area
Limited Industrial
Tourist Commercial
General Commercial
Residential Mixed Use
Low-Medium Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Recreation
Proposed Roads Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
LM
SP/Tract Boundaries
R I
Parcels
0 600 1,20
0 1,80
0 Fee MD t R Grid B4 City Boundary East Lake
Sources: City of Lake Area
Elsinore, 2014-2016 RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP Imagery, 2014.

Open Space
1600
LEGE ND Proposed City MDP Facilities Existing City Storm Drain Facilities Proposed Lake MDP Zone
Watershed Subareas
10-ft Contours
1600
1690
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
1660
1440 City Boundary
1680 1620
1770
1570
1530 1480
1480
1530
1480 1380
1380
1530
1470
Tuscany Hills SP 1470
1390
1460
1380
1400
1520
0 600
I
1,20
0 1,80
1380 0 Fee
t Grid C1 NE City Area
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside
Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP
Imagery, 2014. 1380
1380
1380
1390 1390
1390
1390
1390
1400
1440
1410
1430
1440
1420
1460
1480
1510 1480
1490 1450
1420
Tuscany Hills SP
1350
1510
1450
1730
1770

BIG TEE
1680 DR

DESERTROSEWAY
1570
1340
1540
DR
OMS
S
S Canyon Creek SP
BLO
1490
1560
Q=769 cfs 1490
1740
1530 Canyon Hills SP 1790

GLOXINIA WAY
1810

CEDAR CREEK LN HILLSIDE DR
1640
1790
1560
1790 Q=463 cfs Q=114 cfs Q=226 cfs Q=657 cfs Q=483 cfs
1640 1550
1610
2190
60 16 1720
1820

LEGE ND
1690 Existing City Storm Drain Facilities
Existing City Basins
Proposed Lake MDP Zone
Watershed Subareas
Flowlines
Q=290 cfs
Q=141 cfs
0 600
I
1,20
0 1,80
0 Fee 10-ft
t
Contours Grid C2 SE City Area
SP/Tract Boundaries
Parcels
1750 Sources: City of Lake City Elsinore, 2014 & Boundary 2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside Co. GIS, 2016; NAIP Imagery, 2014. 2010
1760

LEGE NDCalTrans Culverts
APC CS
PRC
P Other CalTrans Structures
RCB Ditc hCity Storm Drains (>36")
RCFC Facilities
RCFC Basins City Detention Basin
10-ft City Contours
City Boundary
0 1,00
0 2,00
0 3,00
0 Feet
Not to Scale
CalTrans Culverts City of Lake Elsinore
Sources: CalTrans, 2015; City of Lake Elsinore, 2014-16; RCFC&WCD, 2014; USDA NAIP, 2014.

TypeA Di tch
LEGE NDG Drainage ¦ Issues City-owned Storm Drain Facilities GT 20" RCFC&WCD Facilities STARINA in City Limits ST City Boundary
G
G G
GGG G
G G G

GG G G GG G G
G
G G
G
G
G G
G G G
G G
G G
G GG

G G G I G PO
LD
G

TTERYST G G G
G G HEA 0 2,00 0
4,00 06,00 0 G A
VE G
G
G G !"
Feet GGG G G
G G

G G G G G MILL G GST GG
G G

G G G G
G G
G G
G
Drainage
City of Lake Issue Areas
Elsinore
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014-16; Riverside Co. RCFC&WCD, 2014; GIS, 2015.

LEGE NDProposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash
Lake East Lake City Boundary
¦
?
a!
"
0 1
I
2 3
Mile
s
Existing MDP Map City of Lake Elsinore
Source: City of Lake Elsinore
¦
!
"
LEGE NDCity Boundary Proposed MDP Zones Temescal Wash I 4,000
Lak
eEast
RCFC MDP Lake
Areas
0 2,00
0 6,00
0 8,00
0 West
Feet
Elsinore MDP Lakeland Village MDP Sedco MDP Soil Hydro GroupA B
C
D
N
Soil Hydro Groups and Proposed MDP Zones Sources: USDA NRCS SSURGO, 2008; Riverside Co. GIS, 2015.

¦
!
"
LEGE NDCity Boundary Proposed MDP Zones
Temescal Wash Lak
eEast
I
Lake
0 2,00
0 4,00
0 6,00
0 8,00
0 RCFC MDP Areas
West Elsinore MDP
Lakeland Village MDP
Sedco MDP
Feet
Consolidated Land Use Categories
Very Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Consolidated General Plan Land Use Designations
for MDP Park
s
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014; Riverside Co. GIS, 2016; City of Menifee, 2014; City of Wildomar, 2015; City of Canyon Lake, 2003.

Open Space
LEG ENDProposed MDP Zones
East Lake
La
keTemes
cal Wash Alberhill Sub- Zone, Tem. Wash Capital
Improvement Facilities
Proposed City MDP Facilities
Proposed City MDP Basins
RCFC MDP AreasWest Elsinore MDP
Lakeland Village MDP
Sedco MDP
RCFC&W CD Facilities
RCFC Proposed Lines
City Detention Basin
RCFC Basins
Alb erhi llSub- Zon e
City Bound
ary ¦
Tem esca lWas h West Zone Elsionre MDP Lake Zon e
!
"
East Lak eZo
I
ne
0 2,0
00 4,0
00 6,0
001 inch = 2,166
feet
Fe Proposed
et
MDP Sedo Districts
cMDP
City of Lake Elsinore Lake land Villag e MDP
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 &
2015; RCFC&WCD, 2014 & 2015; Riverside Co. GIS, 2015; NAIP Imagery, 2014.

LEG END "Proposed Debris Basins City Bound ary City Detention Basin RCFC Basins Watersheds/ Subwatershe ds
A1A " 2 " A4-2
A5-1
A8
DB1 DB2
A
9A9A
A10
A11
"
DB8
" " DB9A DB !"a 10 ?¦
DB9
"
DB5
"
0 2,0
I
00 4,0 00
Feet
6,0 00 8,0 00 "
DB11 " Propose d Debris Basins
DB6
City of Lake Elsinore
Sources: City of Lake Elsinore, 2014 and 2015; USDA NAIP 2014 314 2
3143
324 6
3144
324 8
314 5
324 9
314 6
315 8
316 1
326 3
316 4
326 7
316 6
0 3173
327 7
3174
327 8
3175
327 9
317 6 324 5
334 8
326 8
336 6
327 6
337 8
334 9
335 0
344 8
335 1
344 9
354 7
364 5
374 5
384 4
394 6
404 8
414 8
337 2
337 0
347 5
337 7
346 7
345 0
345 7
355 5
345 8
355 6
365 4
375 6
385 6
395 9
406 0
347 7
357 4
367 1
377 3
347 3347 0
356 5
354 5
354 6
354 8354 9
364 7
355 0
364 8
374 8
357 2
367 0
377 2
387 5
356 9
366 7
356 4357 0
366 5
376 0
364 6
374 6
364 9
374 9
384 9
395 1
365 0
375 0
385 0
395 2
405 4
415 4
425 1
365 3
375 1
385 4
395 3
405 5
415 5
365 1
375 2
385 5
395 4
405 6
415 6
365 2
375 3
385 3
395 7
405 7
415 7
365 8
375 9
385 9
396 4
406 7
416 6
367 2
376 7
368 5
377 5
367 3
365 6
375 5
365 9
375 7
374 4 377 4
386 9
397 6
0 384 6
394 8
405 0
386 2
396 6
407 0
416 9
426 6
386 4
397 0
·|}þ74
385 1
395 5
0 394 9
395 0
415 2
397 7397 1
407 9
418 0
427 6
397 4
407 6
407 8
417 6
427 2
407 1
417 1
426 8
415 3
425 0
417 8
427 3
417 4
427 0
§¨¦215
436 7
445 9
454 8
436 5
445 6
454 9
·|}þ74 §¨¦1
5 455 0
464 8
474 5
483 8
455 3
464 9
474 7
484 7
455 6
465 1
474 9
484 8
494 5
504 4
455 9
465 6
464 6
474 3
484 6
493 7
464 7
LEG END 475 9
484 3
474 0
474 2 City Bound ary
484 4
494 0
484 5
493 9
484 9
494 6
504 5
Proposed MDP Zones
RCFC MDP Areas
495 1
504 9
514 9
MSHCP Criteria Cells 503 8
503 3
514 0
503 6504 6
514 5
524 8
Burrowing Owl Survey Area Narrow Endemic Plants Survey Area - Codes 1 and 2 513 7
513 1
525 SKR Fee 9 Area Boundary
524 0
534 2
524 7524 5
5252
5354 5355
5253
535 6
5254
535 7
5255
535 8
525 6 535 0
535 1535 2
536 Source: 6 Riverside Co. GIS, 2016. USDA NAIP, 2014.

Figure 5-1 - MDP Zones with MSHCP Criteria Cells and I Survey Areas Lake Elsinore Master Drainage Plan 0 1 2 3Mil es ·|}þ74
§¨¦215
·|}þ74 §¨¦
15 LEG ENDCity Bound ary Proposed MDP Zones
RCFC MDP Areas
Paleontologi cal Sensitivity
Source: High A
Riverside Co. GIS, 2016. USDA NAIP, 2014.

Figure 5-2 - MDP Zones with Paleontological I Sensitivity Lake Elsinore Master Drainage Plan 0 1 2 3Mil es LEG ENDCity Bound ary "Blue Line" Streams
NWI Wetlands RCFC MDP AreasWest Elsinore MDP
Lakeland Village MDP
Sedco MDP
·|}þ74 East Lake LakeTemescal Wash
Alberhill Sub- Zone
§¨¦215
·|}þ74 §¨¦
15 Sources: NHD, 2015; USFWS, 2015; Riverside Co. GIS, 2016.

Figure 5-3 - MDP Zones with Wetlands and "Blue Line" I Streams Lake Elsinore Master Drainage Plan 0 1 2 3Mil es

Page 1 of 11 ends

Lake Elsinore City CouncilApril 25, 2023

Lake Elsinore City Council
April 25, 2023