Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - Ordinance

Lake Elsinore City Council
October 28, 2025

Document
Attachment 1 - Ordinance
Meeting
October 28, 2025
Body
Lake Elsinore City Council
Pages
4
Original file
17 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on lakeelsinore.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

ORDINANCE No. 2025-1520

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (DA-2025-09) FOR BLAZED UTOPIA LOCATED AT 233 WEST MINTHORN STREET (APN: 377-220-024)
Whereas, Rahman & Associates, LLC., has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Development Agreement (DA) No. 2025-09 to amend the DA to revise the Community Benefit Fee (CBF) and establish a separate CBF rate for retail (e.g. storefront, delivery to customers) versus non-retail (e.g. cultivation, distribution, manufacturing and testing laboratory) cannabis operations. The proposed amendment also includes revisions to the definitions and general provisions. The project is located at 233 West Minthorn Street (APN:
377-220-024);
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within a MSHCP Criteria Cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria;
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSHCP Criteria Cell, and the MSHCP goals and objectives;
Whereas, pursuant to Chapter 19.12 (Development Agreements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of reviewing and making a recommendation to the City Council (Council) whether the development agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan and whether to approve the development agreement;
Whereas, on September 16, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item, and adopted a resolution recommending that the Council approve Development Agreement Amendment No. 2025-09; and
Whereas, on October 14, 2025, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: That, in accordance with the MSHCP, the Council makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency:

1. The Project is not subject to the City’s LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority’s (RCA) JPR processes as it is not located within a Criteria Cell.

Ord. No. 2025-1520

Page 2 of 4 ends

3 9
6 1
0 2. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas, Vernal Pools Guidelines, and the Fuel Management Guidelines, as the Project is wholly located within an existing building and does not include any earth-disturbing activities; therefore, Sections 6.1.2 or

6.3.1 of the MSHCP are not applicable.

3. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines and the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures because the project is not located within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas or Critical Species Survey Areas.

4. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines because the Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP Criteria Cell or conservation areas.

5. The Project has been conditioned to pay any applicable MSHCP Local Development Mitigation fees.

Section 2: The Council hereby finds and determines that the Project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq. “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs. §§15000 et seq.), specifically pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities), because the proposed project is an existing cannabis business that is operating within a fully developed site and building. The proposed amendment to the business’s development agreement would not result in new construction, additional square footage, or expansion of the existing use.

Section 3: That, in accordance with California Planning and Zoning Law and Section

19.12.080.B. of the LEMC, the Council makes the following findings regarding Development Agreement Amendment No. 2025-09:

1. It is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The proposed development agreement amendment will continue to help offset the potential costs incurred by the City associated with the establishment of a cannabis facility within an industrial district. The project site’s General Plan Land Use designation is Business Professional (BP). The proposed project is consistent with the BP land use designation and with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan.

2. It is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the real property is located.

The proposed amendment to the development agreement will continue to facilitate the establishment of the cannabis facility within an existing industrial building. The cannabis facility has been in operation, including manufacturing and storage uses, consistent with other similar businesses within the Business Professional (BP) General Plan Land use designation and the Limited Manufacturing (M-1) Zoning designation.

3. It is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices.

Ord. No. 2025-1520

Page 3 of 4 ends

3 9
6 1
0 The existing cannabis facility has been operating in a manner that has not resulted in negative impacts on the public and its general welfare. The proposed development agreement amendment will ensure the cannabis facility continues to have beneficial impacts on the surrounding community. Furthermore, the project has been reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments to reduce the potential for any adverse effects.

4. It will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare.

The proposed amendment to the development agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community, as the existing cannabis facility has operated without negative impacts or concerns. The development agreement amendment will ensure the cannabis facility continues to operate safely. Furthermore, the proposed project has been reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments to reduce the potential for adverse effects on health, safety, and the general welfare.

5. It will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.

The cannabis facility is an existing business that has been operating without land-use issues and has not caused adverse impacts on existing businesses or future developments. The proposed amendment to the development agreement will ensure the cannabis facility continues to operate as such.

6. It is consistent with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5.

The proposed amendment to the development agreement includes all mandatory provisions required by Government Code § 65865.2 and does not include any provisions not authorized by the Development Agreement Act.

Section 4: Approval. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement Amendment No. 2025-09 attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the modifications approved by the City Attorney. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and attest, respectively, the Development Agreement Amendment on behalf of the City of Lake Elsinore. The City Clerk is directed to transmit the Development Agreement Amendment to the County Recorder for recordation no later than ten (10) days after the adoption of this ordinance.

Section 5: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions, sections, or applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end each phrase, section, sentence, or word is declared to be severable.

Section 6: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after the date of adoption.

Section 7: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause a synopsis of the same to be published according to law Ord. No. 2025-1520

Page 4 of 4 ends

3 9
6 1
0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 28th day of October 2025.

Brian Tisdale
Mayor
Attest:

Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE )
I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2025-1520 was introduced by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the Regular meeting of October 14, 2025 and adopted at the Regular meeting of October 28, 2025 and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk

← All documents from this meeting