Agenda packet — Lake Forest City Council, March 1, 2022

March 1, 2022

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1

AGENDA

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL

Regular Meeting of the City Council
Tuesday, March 1, 2022

Closed Session 5:30 p.m.

Public Session 6:30 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California

NOTICE: Pursuant to Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.010, Regular Meetings of the City Council are held the First and Third Tuesday of each month at the hour of 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session matters, if required. The Public Session of the meeting shall commence at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Special Meeting times may be held at a different time and date as listed on the Agenda.

AGENDA DOCUMENT REVIEW: The Agenda and staff reports are available on the Internet at www.lakeforestca.gov and at the City Clerk’s Office, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, on the Friday before the meeting on Tuesday.

AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The Agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the pu blic of a general summary
of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The listed Recommended Action represents staff’s recommendation. The City Council may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the recommended action.

AGENDA ON SOCIAL MEDIA: This meeting will be streamed through Facebook Live. Comments will not be taken via Facebook Live. To ensure that the City Council receives your comments, you may submit written comments or voicemail messages to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. The City provides the Facebook Live stream as an additional service to the public. However, the City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. The City is not responsible for any interrupted service.

SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING AND PUBLIC COMMENT:

ASSEMBLY BILL 361: This meeting will occur in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) et seq. (“AB 361”) wherein the City of Lake Forest City Council may continue to participate in meetings via teleconference.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: In addition to attending in person, pursuant to AB 361 members of the public may access the meeting live on our website at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas.

PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING: Members of the public may submit email comments to [email protected]. Email comments will be uploaded to the agenda packet and made part of the official public record of the meeting and will not be read at the meeting. To ensure staff reviews all comments prior to the City Council meeting, please submit email comments no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public may provide comments in-person at the meeting or remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in-person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk. Those wishing to provide comments remotely may join the meeting online at https://call.lifesizecloud.com/5038350 and enter Passcode 1004# or by phone at (312) 584-2401 and enter meeting number 5038350# followed by Passcode 1004#.

March 1, 2022

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2

CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 p.m.

Council Members: Neeki Moatazedi (teleconference)
Mark Tettemer
Scott Voigts
Mayor Pro Tem: Doug Cirbo
Mayor: Robert Pequeño

City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT:

CLOSED SESSION: At this time, the City Council may recess to Closed Session for conference with Legal Counsel to discuss the items listed below pursuant to Government Code requirements. Any items not concluded by 6:30 p.m. may be continued to the end of the Public Session. At this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items listed on the Closed Session agenda. No action may be taken on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. Comments shall be limited to three minutes per item. Any person wishing to address the City Council on a Closed Session matter is requested to complete a "Request to Speak" form available at the door. The completed form is to be submitted to the City Clerk prior to an individual being heard by the City Council. Whenever possible, lengthy testimony should be presented to the City Council in writing (8 copies) and only pertinent points presented orally.

CLOSED SESSION:

1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9
PROPERTY: 100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, LAKE FOREST, CA
AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: CITY OF LAKE FOREST AND SIFI

NETWORKS AMERICA, LLC AND/OR THEIR AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVES
UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct Closed Session.

RECESS: City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business.

RECONVENE: City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.

March 1, 2022 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3

PUBLIC SESSION: 6:30 p.m.

PUBLIC SESSION: At this time, the City Council will convene to consider public matters. Those wishing to address the City Council must submit a completed "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk prior to City Council action.

INVOCATION: The Invocation will be provided by Calvary Chapel.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country to be led by Council Member Tettemer.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT: City Attorney will report on Closed Session.

REPORT FROM STUDENT LIAISON: Report from Natasha Quinn, Student Liaison from El Toro High School.

PRESENTATIONS: (Item No. 2)

2. ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE TRUST UPDATE

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive the presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Members of the public can submit an e -comment to [email protected]. E-comments will not be read at the meeting.

Members of the public may also provide comments in- person at the meeting or remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in - person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk. Those wishing to provide comments remotely may join the meeting online at https://call.lifesizecloud.com/5038350 and enter Passcode 1004# or by phone at (312) 584- 2401 and enter meeting number 5038350# followed by Passcode 1004#.

CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 3 – 8)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

3. MOTION TO WAIVE RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

4. CONTINUING TO HOLD VIRTUAL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Make renewed findings that a state of emergency remains in effect and that state and local officials continue to

March 1, 2022 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4

recommend measures that promote social distancing.

5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON FEBRUARY 15, 2022

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve as submitted.

6. MONTHLY TREASURER'S REPORT - JANUARY 2022

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

7. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the warrant register in the amount of $4,098,974.96 as submitted.

8. PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT WITH ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES FOR

CITYWIDE PLAYGROUND RESURFACING/REPLACING PROJECT

RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve contract documents for Citywide Playground Resurfacing/ Replacement Project (PW 2021-08).

2. Award a contract to Robertson Industries, Inc. with a contract price of $207,230.

3. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from Robertson Industries, Inc.

4. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2021- 2028 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22.

5. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with Robertson Industries Inc., as submitted to form.

March 1, 2022 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5

PUBLIC HEARING(S): (Item Nos. 9 – 10)
Public Hearings are scheduled for a time certain of 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions: 1. Open the Public Hearing. 2. Receive staff report. 3. Accept public testimony. 4. City Council comments and questions. 5. Take appropriate action. Those wishing to address the City Council during the Public Hearing must complete a "Request to Speak" form and provide it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing.

9. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTERS 7.50 AND 9.52 TO THE LAKE

FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN,

DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS REGULATING

URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT HOUSING PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 AND

DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Introduce for first reading an Ordinance Entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ADDING CHAPTERS 7.50 AND 9.52 TO THE LAKE

FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN,

DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS REGULATING

URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT HOUSING PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 AND
DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

10. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 12-21-5483, A CITY-INITIATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD CHAPTER 9.60 OF THE LAKE FOREST

MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS

FOR NEW MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IN THE CITY

RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Find that Zoning Code Amendment 12-21- 5483 is exempt from the provisions of the Califor
nia Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and

2) Introduce First Reading of an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 9.60

TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW

MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IN THE CITY AND DETERMINING THE
ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA (ZC 12-21-5483).

March 1, 2022 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6

DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS: (Item Nos. 11 – 12)
The following matters are for City Council consideration/discussion/action. Members of the public may have the opportunity to address these items if they wish to do so. Please complete the "Request to Speak" form and give to the City Clerk.

11. PORTOLA PARK LIGHTING

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff regarding potential new lighting at Portola Park.

12. VETERANS PARK MEMORIAL FLAGPOLE DISCUSSION

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff regarding the installation of a flagpole at Veterans Park.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:

At this time, the City Manager may comment on agenda and non-agenda items; and report on items of interest to the City Council and community.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:

At this time, City Council Members may comment on agenda or non-agenda matters. No discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, respond to statements made or questions posed by the public, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. In addition, the City Council may refer to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting or direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. No action may be taken on non-agenda matters unless authorized by law (Government Code Section 54954.2).

Council Member Moatazedi:

Council Member Tettemer:

Council Member Voigts:

Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo:

Mayor Pequeño:

March 1, 2022 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7

ADJOURNMENT:

In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (949) 461-3400. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and agenda back-up materials can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk on the Friday prior to the City Council meeting. Copies of all Agendas, Staff Reports and Supporting Materials can also be found on the City’s website – https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas. Agenda and agenda packets, if requested, will be made available in an appropriate alternative format to persons with a disability as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Copies of the agenda are provided at no cost and agenda back-up materials are available at the per page copy cost.

The City of Lake Forest mailing address is City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California.

Phone: (949) 461-3400. FAX (949) 461-3511

CERTIFICATION: I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review on February 24, 2022.

Lisa Berglund
City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Orange County Housing Finance Trust Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive the presentation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 448 into law which authorized the creation of the Orange County Housing Finance Trust. This allowed the County of Orange and any of the cities within Orange County to mutually create a joint powers authority to allow the region to be more competitive and access additional funding sources available to address the homelessness and affordability crisis. The Trust was formed in 2019 to fund housing to assist the homeless population and persons and families with extremely low, very low, and low income within Orange County. The mission of the Orange County Housing Finance Trust is to strengthen the communities in Orange County by financing the development of affordable housing for homeless and low-income individuals and families. A representative from the Orange County Housing Finance Trust (“Trust”), of which the City is a member, will be providing an update of the Trust’s activities over the past year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 2
8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

MOTION TO WAIVE RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

California Government Code 36934 allows titles of ordinances and resolutions to be waived.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, MPA, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 3
9 55136.00000\34536956.1

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: City Attorney
SUBJECT:

CONTINUING TO HOLD VIRTUAL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Make renewed findings that a state of emergency remains in effect and that state and local officials continue to recommend measures that promote social distancing.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Governor has issued a series of executive orders in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, which included a waiver of all physical-presence requirements under the Brown Act. The most recent of these orders was set to expire on September 30, 2021. Assembly Bill (“AB”) 361, which took effect as an urgency measure on September 16, leaves this determination to local agencies, subject to certain findings they must make then renew periodically to allow virtual or telephonic meetings during the pendency of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Staff recommends the City Council make renewed findings that a state of emergency remains in effect at the state level, and that local officials continue to recommend measures that promote social distancing.

BACKGROUND:

The Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 suspended some of the Brown Act’s in- person attendance requirements, but has since expired. AB 361 extends the waiver of in-person attendance requirements, under some additional rules.

On November 2, 2021, in order to continue to have the opportunity to host virtual, hybrid, or remote meetings in a similar manner as previously permitted under the Governor’s order, the City Council made findings that a state of emergency remains in effect and that state or local officials recommend social distancing measures.

Item: 4
10 55136.00000\34536956.1
1 3
5 5
AB 361 requires that these earlier findings be renewed by the City Council every thirty (30) days in order to continue to make use of virtual or telephonic meetings and relaxed in-person attendance requirements for Council meetings.

DISCUSSION:

AB 361 permits many of the meeting adaptations allowed under the earlier Executive Order (which acted as a temporary waiver of the Brown Act’s in-person attendance requirements), while also adding new requirements to the management of remote and teleconference public meetings.

In order to continue to qualify for AB 361’s waiver of in-person meeting requirements, the Council would need to make findings within 30 days of its November 2, 2021 regular meeting that that a state of emergency remains in effect and that state or local officials recommend social distancing measures.

These findings must be renewed every 30 days for remote meetings to continue.

As the Council meets on the first and third Tuesday of every month, the Council need only renew these findings at every other regular session.

Therefore, staff recommends the City Council find and determine that a state of emergency remains in effect and that state or local officials recommend social distancing measures.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Submitted By: City Attorney
Approved By: City Manager
Item: 4
11 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 1

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST

The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest held Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at the Lake Forest City Council Chamber, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, was called to order at 6:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Councilmembers:

Mayor Pro Tem
Mayor:

City Manager:

City Attorney:

City Clerk:

Neeki Moatazedi (teleconference)
Mark Tettemer
Scott Voigts
Doug Cirbo
Robert Pequeño

Debra Rose
Matthew E. Richardson
Lisa Berglund

PUBLIC SESSION:

INVOCATION: The Invocation was provided by Pastor Kathleen Bratun of The Connection Church.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country was led by Council Member Voigts.

PRESENTATIONS: (Item Nos. 1 - 2)
It was moved by Council Member Voigts and seconded by Council Member Tettemer to receive the presentations. The motion passed 4/0 with no audible vote heard from Council Member Moatazedi via teleconference.

1. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION ON PUBLIC SAFETY

ACTON: The presentation was received and filed from the Orange County Sheriff’s Department regarding Public Safety in Lake Forest.

PUBLIC HEARING: (Item No. 15) This item was heard at 6:45 p.m. as required by law.

15. REDISTRICTING PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3

Mayor Pequeño opened the public hearing.

City Manager Rose introduced the item. City Clerk Berglund summarized the item. A presentation from Andrew Westall of Bear Demographics, LLC was received.

Item: 5
12 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 2
Public comments were received Jim Richert. Mr. Richert recommended the Council adopt map 1. Susan Moore submitted a speaker card to the City Clerk however when Ms. Moore’s name was called, she waived her request to speak.

Mayor Pequeño closed the public hearing.

MOTION:

Council Member Voigts made a motion to adopt Map B. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pequeño.

Council Member Tettemer made a substitute motion to adopt Map 1. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo.

The City Council voted on the substitute motion. The motion failed with three no votes by Mayor Pequeño and Council Members Moatazedi and Voigts and two aye votes by Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo and Council Member Tettemer. The motion failed 2/3.

The City Council voted on the main motion. The motion passed three aye votes by Mayor Pequeño and Council Members Moatazedi and Voigts and two no votes by Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo and Council Member Tettemer. The motion passed 3/2.

Staff will return to the City Council on March 15, 2022, with an ordinance adopting the new district boundaries as outlined in the previously adopted redistricting schedule.

PRESENTATIONS: (Item Nos. 1 - 2 continued)

2. ORANGE COUNTY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT

PRESENTATION ON THE STERIKLIZED INSECT TECHNIQUE

ACTION: The presentation was received and filed from the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

No public comments were offered by members of the public.

Item: 5
13 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 3
CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 3 - 14)
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts and seconded by Council Member Tettemer to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 3-14. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

3. MOTION TO WAIVE RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda were determined to have been read by title and further reading was waived.

4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON JANUARY 18, 2022

ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.

5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON FEBRUARY 1, 2022

ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.

6. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON FEBRUARY 1, 2022

ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.

7. NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK RENOVATIONS:

DARRIN PARK, MONTBURY PARK, AND PEBBLE CREEK PARK (PW 2017- 17B)

ACTION:

1. It was determined that Horizons Construction Company International, Inc. has completed construction of the Neighborhood Park Renovations: Darrin Park, Montbury Park, and Pebble Creek Park (PW 2017-17B).

2. The Notice of Completion was approved and the Mayor was authorized to execute the document on behalf of the City.

3. The City Clerk was authorized to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County within fifteen days of the City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code.

4. Staff was authorized to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.

Item: 5
14 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 4

8. NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ARBOR MINI PARKS (PW 2019 -17)

ACTION: 1. It was determined that Elegant Construction, Inc. has completed construction of the Arbor Mini Parks (PW 2019 -17)

2. The Notice of Completion was approved and the Mayor was authorized to execute the document on behalf of the City.

4. Staff was authorized to release any unencumbered retention I accordance with California law.

9. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION TO
CALRECYCLE FOR SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM AND

RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE CITY BUDGET

ACTION: 1. A Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER, OR THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AS DESIGNEE, TO FILE AND

SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVER (CALRECYCLE) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST IS
ELIGIBLE” was adopted.

2. A Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR 2021 – 2023; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2021 – 2022” was adopted.

10. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT APPLICATION

ACTION: A Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIAING THE CITY

MANAGER, OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE, TO FILE AND SUBMT HAZARD

MITIGATION GRANT APPLICAITNS TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION (CAL FIRE) FOR THE LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION WILDFIRE PREVENTION PROJECT” was adopted.

11. Second Reading of an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA ADDING SECTION

11.24.040 TO CHAPTER 11.24 OF DIVISION III OF TITLE 11 OF THE LAKE

FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PROHIBITING Item: 5
15 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 5

THE UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS IN THE
CITY

ACTION:

1. The second reading of Ordinance No. 349 entitled, “AN ORDIANCE OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 11.24.040 TO CHAPTER 11.24 OF DIVISION III OF TITLE 11 OF

THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS

PROHIBITING THE UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CATALYTIC
CONVERTER IN THE CITY” was conducted.

2. Ordinance No. 349 was adopted.

12. LEGISLATIVE MATTERS – SUPPORT FOR VETERANS CEMETERY AB 1595 AND RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ELIMINATION OF FENTANYL

USE IN LAKE FOREST

ACTION:

1. The City Council supported California Assembly Bill 1595.

2. A resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA DESCRIBING THE CITY’S

COMMITMENT TO ELIMINATING THE PRESENCE OF FENTANYL IN THE COMMUNITY” was adopted.

13. CONTRACT AWARD TO RJM DESIGN GROUP FOR CONSTRUCTION

SUPPORT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

ACTION: 1. The Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc. for construction support service for the Neighborhood Park Improvement Project with a compensation amount of $30,000 was approved.

2. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc. substantially in the form attached.

14. AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT GRANT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE

ACTION: 1. The update related to the City’s progress in implementing the American Rescue Act Grant Plan was received and filed.

2. The Spending Categories and Budgets Established by the American Rescue Act Grant Plan were affirmed.

3. The City’s Intent to Accept the $10 Million Standard Allowance Provided by the American Rescue Plan Act Final Rule were affirmed.

Item: 5
16 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2022
Page No. 6
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS: (Item No. 16)

16. 1ST AIR NAVAL GUNFIRE LIAISON COMPANY, UNITED STATES MARINE

CORPS, CAMP PENDETON, ADOPTION DISCUSSION

City Manager Rose introduced the item. Deputy City Manager Channing summarized the item using a power point presentation. Council Member Voigts made voiced his support for the adoption of 1st ANGLICO. Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo complimented Dianne Rosenberg for her loyal, volunteerism with the organization.

Public comment was received by Community Services Commissioner Victor Scherr and Dianne Rosenberg.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo made a motion to adopt the 1st Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company (“ANGLICO”) of the United States Marine Corps based at Camp Pendleton and for staff to plan a formal ceremony in the future. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pequeño. The motion passed 5/0.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT:

City Manager Rose had no further comments.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:

Council Member Moatazedi:

Council Member Moatazedi had no further comments.

Council Member Tettemer:

Council Member Tettemer had no further comments.

Council Member Voigts:

Council Member Voigts had no further comments.

Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo:

Mayor Pro Tem Cirbo had no further comments.

Mayor Pequeño:

Mayor Pequeño thanked staff for all their hard work.

He welcomed new employee Weil Jamal to the City of
Lake Forest and wished employee Patricia Robinson
farewell as she transitions to her new position outside of the city.

ADJOURNMENT: The regular meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 7:47 p.m.

Respectfully submitted: APPROVED:

__
LISA BERGLUND, MPA ROBERT PEQUEÑO

CITY CLERK MAYOR

Item: 5
17 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 03/01/2022
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:

MONTHLY TREASURER'S REPORT - JANUARY 2022
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive and file.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Treasurer's Report for the month ended January 31, 2022 is attached. There are no exceptions to the Investment Policy. Total cash and investments equal $146.0 million for the period.

DISCUSSION:

The Treasurer’s Report for the month ended January 31, 2022 is attached. There are no exceptions to the Investment Policy.

Investment Portfolio
The City’s balances consist of the following:

Type Millions
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) $ 2.0
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association (FHLMC) 2.0
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 74.9
California Asset Management Program (CAMP) 0.0
Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) 41.3
Federated Government Obligations Fund 10.5
Operating Bank Balance-US Bank 15.3
Total Cash and Investments $ 146.0
The investment portfolio balance (excluding the operating bank balance) increased $25.2 million during the last month. The balance in the investment Item: 6
18 1
8 1
3 portfolio was consistent with staff’s expectations based on the operating and capital improvement activities during the month. The significant portfolio increase resulted from a deposit into the LAIF investment fund from available cash held in the Operating Bank account held at US Bank.

There were no investment maturities or purchases during the month. The types of investments currently included in the portfolio are described below with any new information since the last report.

The Local Agency Investment Fund (“LAIF”), Orange County Investment Pool (“OCIP”), and California Asset Management Program (“CAMP”) are the City’s liquidity pools. Liquidity pools are the source of funding for weekly ongoing operating costs. Many cities use only LAIF, while Lake Forest has been more conservative in this respect. The US Bank balance reflected on the previous page is mostly transitory, as a function of holding deposits until the funds are invested and subsequently disbursed from LAIF/OCIP/CAMP for operations.

State law requires that these bank balances be collateralized at 110%. The Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Share Money Market Fund is also mostly transitory, as a function of holding matured investments and earnings until the City purchases new investments. This account is the custodial account for the City’s investment safekeeping institution, US Bank.

LAIF is a conservative investment pool managed by the State. The State cannot access these balances to fund its operational expenditures. Staff believes it is still prudent to maintain funds for liquidity in LAIF. LAIF earned .234% on the fund in January, which is slightly higher than the City’s earnings of .212% as of December 31, 2021.

Orange County Investment Pool (“OCIP”) allows local government agencies to voluntarily invest surplus cash to obtain competitive yields while maintaining safety and liquidity, thereby creating a multi-million-dollar County investment pool that enables investments in diversified instruments. OCIP earned approximately .402% on the fund as of January 31, 2022.

CAMP is a conservative short-term money market investment pool for a group of local agencies. CAMP earned approximately .05% on the fund as of January 31, 2022.

Cash with Fiscal Agent
During the month, cash with the fiscal agent was unchanged.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Item: 6
19 1
8 1
3 There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

Monthly Treasurer's Report
Initiated By: Amy Lewis, Assistant Director of Finance
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 6
20 ATTACHMENT
Item: 6
21 VALUE OF PORTFOLIO
This Month Last Month
Market Value 130,728,985$ 105,592,056$
Book Value 130,737,747$ 105,594,158$
This Month Last Month
Average Maturity (days) 3 4
Average Maturity to Call (days) 3 4
RETURN
This Month Last Month
Average Annual Return 0.322% 0.330%
Average Annual Return to Call 0.322% 0.330%

1. I hereby certify that the investments are in compliance with the investment policy approved by the City Council on December 21, 2021.

2. Although any investment is impacted by market conditions, the current investments are structured to reduce the impact of market conditions.

3. The market values for the investments are provided by the City's Custodian, US Bank.

Local Agency Investment Fund, California Asset Management Program and

4. The City has the ability to meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months.

Kevin R. Shirah
Director of Finance / City Treasurer

CITY OF LAKE FOREST

MONTHLY INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS
January 31, 2022
Orange County Investment Pool market values are the withdrawal amount. 1 Item: 6
22 SUMMARY OF TRANSACTIONS
Investment Securities*
Activity
Dollar Volume
(Par Value)
Transaction
Count
Purchases -$ -$
Maturities -$ 0
Called - Prior to Maturity -$ -$
Sale - Prior to Maturity -$ -$
* The Investment Securities activity is also included in the account summary below.

LAIF, CAMP, OCIP & Money Market Mutual Fund (MMMF)
Category Deposits Withdrawals
Local Agency Investment Fund 25,128,680$ -$
California Asset Management Program -$ -$ Orange County Investment Pool 18,006$ 2,033$
Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Shares 217$ 1,281$ No exceptions.

EXCEPTIONS TO INVESTMENT POLICY
January 31, 2022

CITY OF LAKE FOREST

MONTHLY INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS/
January 31, 2022

EXCEPTIONS TO INVESTMENT POLICY

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
2 Item: 6
23 CITY OF LAKE FOREST

CASH AND INVESTMENTS
January 31, 2022
CASH & INVESTMENTS:

Type Market Value
Bank Accounts 15,318,886$
Investments 4,015,220
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,945,978
California Asset Management Program 3,920
Orange County Investment Pool 41,256,133
Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Shares 10,507,733 Total 146,047,870$
CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT:

Type Market Value
First American Treasury Obligatory Fund -$
3 Item: 6
24 CITY OF LAKE FOREST

PORTFOLIO STRUCTURE
January 31, 2022
COMPARISON OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY TYPE:

Average
% or $ Average Maturity Allowed
Book % or $ Over Maturity to Call Maturity
Type of Instrument Value Portfolio Allowed Limit (in days) (in days) (in days) U.S. Treasury Bills 0.0% 100% 1825
U.S. Treasury Notes 0.0% 100% 1825
U.S. Treasury Bonds 0.0% 100% 1825
Federal Agencies 4,023,982$ 3.1% 100% 79 79 1825
Bankers' Acceptances 0.0% 20% 180
Certificates of Deposit (Non-Negotiable) 0.0% 30% 730
Commercial Paper 0.0% 25% 270
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,945,978 57.3% $75 MM N/A N/A N/A California Asset Management Program 3,920 0.0% 30% N/A N/A N/A Orange County Investment Pool 41,256,133 31.6% 100% N/A N/A N/A Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Shares 10,507,733 8.0% 10% N/A N/A N/A Totals 130,737,747$ 100.0%
CALLABLES AS PERCENTAGE OF BOOK VALUE:

Federal Agencies - Callable -$ 0.0% 100% 0 0 1825 4 Item: 6
25 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY ISSUER:

Book % of % or $ Over
Issuer Name Value Portfolio Allowed Limit Quality
U.S. Treasury -$ 100% AAA+
Federal Home Loan Bank 2,023,982 1.5% 70% AAA
Federal National Mortgage Association 0 0.0% 70% AAA
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 2,000,000 1.5% 70% AAA Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation 0 0.0% 70% AAA Federal Farm Credit Bank 0 0.1% 70% AAA
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,945,978 57.3% $75 MM N/R California Asset Management Program 3,920 0.0% 30% N/R Orange County Investment Pool 41,256,133 31.6% 100% N/R Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Shares 10,507,733 8.0% 10% AAA Totals 130,737,747$ 100.0%
DISTRIBUTION BY SELLING INSTITUTION:
% of
Name of Institution Book Value Total
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. -$ 0.0% Multi-Bank Securities, Inc. 0 0.0%
Wedbush Morgan 4,023,982 3.1%
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,945,978 57.3%
California Asset Management Program 3,920 0.0%
Orange County Investment Pool 41,256,133 31.6%
Federated Government Obligations Fund Service Shares 10,507,733 8.0% Totals 130,737,747$ 100.0%

CITY OF LAKE FOREST

DISTRIBUTION BY SELLING INSTITUTION
January 31, 2022

PORTFOLIO STRUCTURE
5 Item: 6
26 CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PORTFOLIO DETAILS SORTED BY MATURITY DATES 1
January 31, 2022
Market Par Book Coupon Yield to Purchase Maturity
Type of Instrument Issuer 2 Seller 3 Value 4
Value Value Rate Maturity Date Date
Federal Agency FHLMC Wedbush 2,003,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2.000% 2.000% 2/28/17 2/28/22 Federal Agency FHLB Wedbush 2,012,220 2,000,000 2,023,982 2.125% 1.870% 6/29/17 6/10/22 LAIF 5
N/A N/A 74,945,978 74,945,978 74,945,978 N/A N/A N/A N/A CAMP 6
N/A N/A 3,920 3,920 3,920 N/A N/A N/A N/A
OCIP 7
N/A N/A 41,256,133 41,256,133 41,256,133 N/A N/A N/A N/A Money Market Fund 8
N/A N/A 10,507,733 10,507,733 10,507,733 N/A N/A N/A N/A Totals 130,728,985$ 130,713,765$ 130,737,747$
1 All investments are held in safekeeping by US Bank.
2 UST = U.S. Treasury/FHLB = Federal Home Loan Bank/FHLMC = Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co./ FFCB = Federal Farm Credit Bank/FNMA=Federal National Mortgage Association/ FAMCA = Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp.
3 RAYMOND = Raymond James & Associates, Inc. / MULTI-BANK = Multi-Bank Securities, Inc. 4 Market values are obtained monthly from US Bank.
5 Local Agency Investment Fund
6 California Asset Management Program
7 Orange County Investment Pool
8 Federated Government Obligations Money Market Fund
6 Item: 6
27 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:

CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Approve the warrant register in the amount of $4,098,974.96 as submitted.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In accordance with Government Code Section 37202 and Lake Forest Municipal Code Chapter 3.16, the officials below certify that 1) the invoices of the warrant register have been properly reviewed and 2) funds are available for payment of the warrants.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The amount of the warrant register is $4,098,974.96.

ATTACHMENTS:

Warrant Register
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 7
28 Attachment

Item: 7
29 This warrant register includes:

Total manual warrants 15,354.38$
Total current warrants 4,083,620.58
Grand total warrant register 4,098,974.96$
The following warrants are in excess of $10,000:

AMOUNT
ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 68334 37,120.79
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 68336 314,813.28
ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 68337 22,710.63
BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 68339 43,015.50
BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 68301 37,706.25
BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 68253 200,887.28
BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 68387 134,181.75
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 68340 77,341.60
COUNTY OF ORANGE 68390 149,002.00
COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 68308 1,583,624.84
COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 68258 151,528.02
COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 68344 126,936.08
COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 68260 28,298.09
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 68310 13,381.00
ECONOMICS INC. 68349 11,070.41
HARTZOG & CRABILL INC. 68354 17,425.96
INTERWEST CONSULTING 68268 394,867.65
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 68317 23,357.00
MIKE LINARES INC 68400 12,065.00
NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 68320 182,237.25
R.F. DICKSON CO., INC. 68277 32,480.26
R.F. DICKSON CO., INC. 68371 32,480.26
SAN DIEGO ICE COMPANY, INC 110562 15,354.38
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68375 72,613.87
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68408 36,987.51
SPECTRASYSTEMS, INC. 68329 14,936.40
SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 68377 14,425.00
SWRCB 68287 35,333.00
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 68379 22,492.36
Department: Designation: Designation:

City Clerk (CC) Finance (F)
City Manager (CM) Management Services (MS)
Community Development (CD) Public Works (PW)
Community Services (CS) Police Services (PS)
City of Lake Forest
Warrant Register
February 2022
Department:

Item: 7
30 1:27 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
1Page:

Check Amount
Check Date
Invoice Description1Vendor Name Ref No. Discount Date
PO No. Pay DateInvoice Description2Vendor Name Line 2
Due Date
Invoice Number
Vendor Number
City Bank
State/Province Zip/Postal
Discount AmountCheck No.

Taxes Withheld

0.0001/28/2022 110562MANL
01/28/2022011812
01/28/2022
01/28/2022SNOWFEST 01/29 ICE/SNOW (CS) 117254SAN DIEGO ICE COMPANY, INC 15,354.3800-2172257

0.00 Total: 110562Check No. 15,354.38
Total for SAN DIEGO ICE COMPANY, INC 15,354.38

0.00 0.00
15,354.38
15,354.38
15,354.38
Net Total:

Less Hand Check Total:

Grand Total:

Total Invoices: 1 Less Credit Memos:

Outstanding Invoice Total:

Item: 7
31 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
1Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92692

0.0002/03/2022 68245OP
02/03/20222613
02/03/2022
02/03/2022NAME TAGS HERNANDEZ (PS) 117273A SOURCE OF PRIDE

22.639110341

0.00 MISSION VIEJO
Total: 68245Check No. 22.63
Total for A SOURCE OF PRIDE 22.63
CA 92081

0.0002/03/2022 68246OP
02/03/2022011409
02/03/2022SENSORS JAN (CM)
02/03/2022IT ROOM TEMPERATURE & HUMIDITY 117271ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,018.312201017-IN

0.00 VISTA
Total: 68246Check No. 1,018.31
CA 92081

0.0002/17/2022 68334OP
02/17/2022011409
02/17/2022
02/17/2022BACKUP SOFTWARE RENEWAL (CM) 117436ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 7,882.292112080-IN

0.00 VISTA
CA 92081

0.0002/17/2022 68334OP
02/17/2022011409
02/17/2022
02/17/2022IT MANAGED SERVICES FEB (CM) 117437ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 29,223.50W202480-IN

0.00 VISTA
CA 92081

0.0002/17/2022 68334OP
02/17/2022011409
02/17/2022
02/17/2022OFFICE 365 RENEWAL (CM) 117438ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC.

15.00W202548-IN

0.00 VISTA
Total: 68334Check No. 37,120.79
CA 92081

0.0002/24/2022 68381OP
02/24/2022011409
02/24/2022
02/24/2022FINGERPRINT SCANNERS (CM) 117517ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 8,404.502202022-IN

0.00 VISTA
Total: 68381Check No. 8,404.50
Total for ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. 46,543.60
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68247OP
02/03/20221940
02/03/2022
02/03/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR (CD) 117266AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 1,171.24JUL - SEP 2021

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Item: 7
32 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
2Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68247OP
02/03/20221940
02/03/2022(CS)
02/03/2022SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM DEC 117272AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 3,296.981221

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68247Check No. 4,468.22
CA 92630

0.0002/10/2022 68294OP
02/10/20221940
02/10/2022
02/10/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 2ND QTR (CD) 117377AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 1,889.26OCT - DEC 2021

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68294Check No. 1,889.26
Total for AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 6,357.48
CA 92679

0.0002/10/2022 68295OP
02/10/2022010989
02/10/2022SNOWFEST PITTSFORD PARK (CS)
02/10/2022PORTALET RENTALS 1/26 117407AJ PORTABLES INC. 640.0050695

0.00 COTO DE CAZA
Total: 68295Check No. 640.00
Total for AJ PORTABLES INC. 640.00
CA 92612

0.0002/17/2022 68335OP
02/17/2022011357
02/17/2022HEROES PARK FEB (PW)
02/17/2022RESTROOM KEYPAD REPAIR 117417ALH SECURITY INC. 593.6813175

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68335Check No. 593.68
Total for ALH SECURITY INC. 593.68
CA 92878-2229

0.0002/17/2022 68336OP
02/17/20220116
02/17/2022PORTOLA TO EL TORO DEC (PW)
02/17/2022GLENN RANCH ROAD RESURFACING 117418ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 314,813.28GRR PAYMENT 02

0.00 CORONA
Total: 68336Check No. 314,813.28
Total for ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 314,813.28
CA 90084

0.0002/17/2022 68337OP
02/17/20220126
02/17/202201/08/2022 CONTRACT SERVICES
02/17/2022CROSSING GUARD 12/26/21 - 117419ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 8,042.6174545

0.00 SERVICES, INC.

LOS ANGELES
Item: 7
33 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
3Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 90084

0.0002/17/2022 68337OP
02/17/20220126
02/17/202201/22/22 CONTRACT SERVICES
02/17/2022CROSSING GUARD 01/09/22 - 117420ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 14,668.0274880

0.00 SERVICES, INC.

LOS ANGELES
Total: 68337Check No. 22,710.63
Total for ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 22,710.63
CA 92688

0.0002/24/2022 68382OP
02/24/2022011774
02/24/2022MOUNTAIN VIEW PARK OCT (PW)
02/24/2022BEE / WASP TREATMENT 117550ALLURE PEST MANAGEMENT INC. 150.0051173

0.00 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
Total: 68382Check No. 150.00
Total for ALLURE PEST MANAGEMENT INC. 150.00
CA 92614

0.0002/10/2022 68296OP
02/10/2022011426
02/10/2022QTRS (CD)
02/10/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST & 2ND 117380ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY 2,500.00JUL - DEC 2021

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68296Check No. 2,500.00
Total for ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY 2,500.00
CA 92675

0.0002/10/2022 68297OP
02/10/2022010013
02/10/2022NEW BUSINESS RECEPTION (MS)
02/10/2022COCKTAIL TABLES/LINENS 1/14 117408AMAZING TENTS & EVENTS 304.507725

0.00 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Total: 68297Check No. 304.50
CA 92675

0.0002/17/2022 68338OP
02/17/2022010013
02/17/2022
02/17/2022SNOWFEST 01/29 CANOPIES (CS) 117416AMAZING TENTS & EVENTS 595.007726

0.00 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Total: 68338Check No. 595.00
Total for AMAZING TENTS & EVENTS 899.50
IL 60197-4291

0.0002/03/2022 68248OP
02/03/202201001
02/03/2022ACKERMAN (CD)
02/03/2022MEMBERSHIP DUES FY 22-23 117268AMERICAN PLANNING 895.00066458-2212

0.00 ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS

CAROL STREAM
Total: 68248Check No. 895.00
Item: 7
34 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
4Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for AMERICAN PLANNING 895.00
CA 90240

0.0002/03/2022 68249OP
02/03/2022011482
02/03/2022
02/03/2022REHAB LOAN FEES NIENHUIS (CD) 117324AMERINAT 431.00FS-5341

0.00 RECEIVABLES DEPARTMENT
DOWNEY
Total: 68249Check No. 431.00
CA 90240

0.0002/03/2022 68250OP
02/03/2022011482
02/03/2022
02/03/2022MONTHLY REHAB LOAN DEC (CD) 117269AMERINAT
461.00LPM-21-000714

0.00 RECEIVABLES DEPARTMENT
DOWNEY
Total: 68250Check No. 461.00
Total for AMERINAT 892.00
CA 92653

0.0002/24/2022 68383OP
02/24/2022011243
02/24/2022SPORTS PARK (CS)
02/24/2022GOLF CART REPAIRS AUG 2021 117538APEX GOLF CARTS 207.7310252

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
Total: 68383Check No. 207.73
Total for APEX GOLF CARTS 207.73
CA 90248

0.0002/10/2022 68298OP
02/10/2022010902
02/10/2022VETERANS PARK (PW)
02/10/2022LAKE MAINTENANCE JAN 117361AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL 3,095.0051075

0.00 TECHNOLOGIES

GARDENA
Total: 68298Check No. 3,095.00
Total for AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL 3,095.00
MN 56032

0.0002/10/2022 68299OP
02/10/2022011710
02/10/2022
02/10/2022REHAB LOAN FEES JACKSON (CD) 117362ARCADIAN BANK 130.00311

0.00 FREEBORN
Total: 68299Check No. 130.00
Total for ARCADIAN BANK 130.00
Item: 7
35 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
5Page:

Taxes Withheld
MA 02186

0.0002/24/2022 68384OP
02/24/2022011050
02/24/2022
02/24/2022FLEET GPS UNITS FEB (F) 117560ASSURED TELEMATICS INC. 291.0086237

0.00 MILTON
Total: 68384Check No. 291.00
Total for ASSURED TELEMATICS INC. 291.00
IL 60197-9011

0.0002/10/2022 68300OP
02/10/2022011084
02/10/2022
02/10/2022PARK UTILITIES JAN (PW) 117347AT&T CALNET3

44.64157 000017673018

0.00 CAROL STREAM
Total: 68300Check No. 44.64
IL 60197-9011

0.0002/24/2022 68385OP
02/24/2022011084
02/24/2022PARK (PW)
02/24/2022PARK UTILITIES JAN RIMGATE 117543AT&T CALNET3

65.15189 000017724972

0.00 CAROL STREAM
Total: 68385Check No. 65.15
Total for AT&T CALNET3 109.79
IL 60197-5019

0.0002/03/2022 68251OP
02/03/202219083
02/03/2022CIVIC CENTER (CM)
02/03/2022INTERNET SERVICE DEC 117270AT&T
1,287.103944 0389557607

0.00 CAROL STREAM
Total: 68251Check No. 1,287.10
Total for AT&T 1,287.10
CA 95002

0.0002/10/2022 68301OP
02/10/2022011384
02/10/2022PW2019-30B-APS PHASE 2 CIP(PW)
02/10/2022ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS 117352BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 19,475.0014671

0.00 ALVISO
CA 95002

0.0002/10/2022 68301OP
02/10/2022011384
02/10/2022RESPONSE (PW)
02/10/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEC MAINTENANCE 117353BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 12,735.7514560

0.00 ALVISO
CA 95002

0.0002/10/2022 68301OP
02/10/2022011384
02/10/2022ROUTINE (PW)
02/10/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEC MAINTENANCE 117375BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 5,495.5014561

0.00 ALVISO
Total: 68301Check No. 37,706.25
Item: 7
36 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
6Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 95002

0.0002/17/2022 68339OP
02/17/2022011384
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE RESPONSE
02/17/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL JAN 117439BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 36,447.0014753

0.00 ALVISO
CA 95002

0.0002/17/2022 68339OP
02/17/2022011384
02/17/2022
02/17/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL CLAIM JAN (PW) 117440BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 6,568.5014747

0.00 ALVISO
Total: 68339Check No. 43,015.50
CA 95002

0.0002/24/2022 68386OP
02/24/2022011384
02/24/2022ROUTINE (PW)
02/24/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL JAN MAINTENANCE 117553BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 5,495.5014903

0.00 ALVISO
Total: 68386Check No. 5,495.50
Total for BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 86,217.25
CA 95604

0.0002/03/2022 68252OP
02/03/2022011775
02/03/2022INTERROGATION GUTIERREZ (PS)
02/03/2022INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW & 117278BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INC 575.00IV00358

0.00 AUBURN
Total: 68252Check No. 575.00
Total for BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INC 575.00
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022SPORTS PARKS (PW)
02/03/2022IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 117274BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 3,830.547680641

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022SPORTS PARK (PW)
02/03/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JAN 117275BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 75,323.727703863

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022LFSP (PW)
02/03/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JAN 117276BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 55,233.037703861

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022LFSP (PW)
02/03/2022VFD PUMP REPLACEMENT DEC 117277BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 6,328.047702876

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
Item: 7
37 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
7Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022CIVIC CENTER (PW)
02/03/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JAN 117279BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 3,625.007692916

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/03/2022 68253OP
02/03/2022011265
02/03/2022SERRANO CREEK PARK (PW)
02/03/2022URBAN FORESTRY MGMT NOV 117280BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 56,546.957668071

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
Total: 68253Check No. 200,887.28
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/10/2022 68302OP
02/10/2022011265
02/10/2022LFSP (PW)
02/10/2022FERTIGATION SERVICES JAN 117350BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 1,492.007744728

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
Total: 68302Check No. 1,492.00
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/24/2022 68387OP
02/24/2022011265
02/24/2022CIVIC CENTER (PW)
02/24/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE FEB 117539BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 3,625.007733508

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/24/2022 68387OP
02/24/2022011265
02/24/2022LFSP (PW)
02/24/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE FEB 117540BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 55,233.037739722

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
CA 91110-2463

0.0002/24/2022 68387OP
02/24/2022011265
02/24/2022SPORTS PARK (PW)
02/24/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE FEB 117541BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 75,323.727739724

0.00 INC.

PASADENA
Total: 68387Check No. 134,181.75
Total for BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 336,561.03
CA 92067

0.0002/10/2022 68303OP
02/10/2022011607
02/10/2022DEVELOPMENT JAN (PW)
02/10/2022CC&R AMENDMENT FOR AJ WEST 117365CALIFORNIA LOT BOOK INC.

60.000122428

0.00 RANCHO SANTA FE
Total: 68303Check No. 60.00
Total for CALIFORNIA LOT BOOK INC. 60.00
Item: 7
38 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
8Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92707

0.0002/03/2022 68254OP
02/03/2022011222
02/03/2022
02/03/2022SENIOR TRANSPORTATION DEC (CS) 117285CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 460.6512508021

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68254Check No. 460.65
Total for CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 460.65
CA 92675

0.0002/03/2022 68255OP
02/03/202203025
02/03/2022
02/03/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR (CD) 117281CAMINO HEALTH CENTER 3,062.50JUL - SEP 2021

0.00 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Total: 68255Check No. 3,062.50
CA 92675

0.0002/10/2022 68304OP
02/10/202203025
02/10/2022
02/10/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 2ND QTR (CD) 117378CAMINO HEALTH CENTER 3,062.50OCT - DEC 2021

0.00 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Total: 68304Check No. 3,062.50
Total for CAMINO HEALTH CENTER 6,125.00
CA 92691

0.0002/17/2022 68340OP
02/17/20220308
02/17/2022
02/17/2022STREET MAINTENANCE JAN (PW) 117443CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 77,341.6063709

0.00 MISSION VIEJO
Total: 68340Check No. 77,341.60
Total for CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 77,341.60
CA 92653

0.0002/10/2022 68305OP
02/10/20220309
02/10/2022NOV (PW)
02/10/2022STREET LIGHT REIMBURSEMENT 117351CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS

8.95CLH00492

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
Total: 68305Check No. 8.95
Total for CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS 8.95
CA 92619

0.0002/17/2022 68341OP
02/17/2022011264
02/17/2022DISPENSARY (CD)
02/17/2022LOCKSMITH SERVICES FEB 117444COASTAL LOCKSMITH INC. 538.771307

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68341Check No. 538.77
Item: 7
39 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
9Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for COASTAL LOCKSMITH INC. 538.77
MN 55485-5806

0.0002/03/2022 68256OP
02/03/2022011153
02/03/2022
02/03/2022OFFICE 365 RENEWAL (CM) 117283CONVERGEONE INC.

40.323405085

0.00 NW 5806

MINNEAPOLIS
Total: 68256Check No. 40.32
MN 55485-5806

0.0002/24/2022 68388OP
02/24/2022011153
02/24/2022
02/24/2022OFFICE 365 RENEWAL (CM) 117518CONVERGEONE INC.

40.323409800

0.00 NW 5806

MINNEAPOLIS
Total: 68388Check No. 40.32
Total for CONVERGEONE INC. 80.64
IL 60678

0.0002/17/2022 68342OP
02/17/2022011322
02/17/2022
02/17/2022FIBER TROUBLESHOOTING JAN (CM) 117442CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1,172.69W1233826

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68342Check No. 1,172.69
Total for CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1,172.69
IL 60693

0.0002/03/2022 68257OP
02/03/2022011314
02/03/2022
02/03/2022COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES JAN (CM) 117282COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC. 264.65115365598-1

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68257Check No. 264.65
IL 60693

0.0002/24/2022 68389OP
02/24/2022011314
02/24/2022
02/24/2022COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES FEB (CM) 117524COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC. 264.65115610636-1

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68389Check No. 264.65
Total for COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC. 529.30
CA 92702

0.0002/03/2022 68258OP
02/03/2022031362
02/03/2022FY 21-22 (PW)
02/03/2022NPDES SHARED COST D02-048 117288COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 151,528.02PW220229

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Item: 7
40 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
10Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total: 68258Check No. 151,528.02
CA 92702

0.0002/03/2022 68259OP
02/03/2022031362
02/03/2022AREA FY 21-22 (PW)
02/03/2022SOUTH OC WATERSHED MGMT 117286COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 3,375.07PW220296

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68259Check No. 3,375.07
CA 92702

0.0002/03/2022 68260OP
02/03/2022031362
02/03/2022TMDL FY 21-22 (PW)
02/03/2022NPDES SEDIMENT D98-034 117287COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 28,298.09PW220357

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68260Check No. 28,298.09
CA 92702

0.0002/10/2022 68306OP
02/10/2022031362
02/10/2022DEC FY21/22 (PS)
02/10/2022800MHZ FLAT RATE BILLING OCT - 117386COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 2,324.24SC13201

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68306Check No. 2,324.24
CA 92702

0.0002/10/2022 68307OP
02/10/2022031362
02/10/2022MAR FY21/22 (PS)
02/10/2022800MHZ COST ALLOCATION JAN - 117387COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 6,984.00SC13266

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68307Check No. 6,984.00
CA 92702

0.0002/10/2022 68308OP
02/10/2022031362
02/10/2022
02/10/2022LAW ENFORCEMENT FEB (PS) 117367COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 1,583,624.84SH 61378

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68308Check No. 1,583,624.84
CA 92702

0.0002/17/2022 68343OP
02/17/2022031362
02/17/2022
02/07/2022AFIS FINGERPRINT FEB (PS) 117446COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 3,315.00SH 61354

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68343Check No. 3,315.00
Item: 7
41 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
11Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92702

0.0002/17/2022 68344OP
02/17/2022031362
02/17/2022ANIMAL CONTROL (PS)
02/17/2022CONTRACT SERVICES OCT - DEC 117447COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 126,936.08AC2290046

0.00 COLLECTOR

SANTA ANA
Total: 68344Check No. 126,936.08
Total for COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX 1,906,385.34
CA 92702

0.0002/24/2022 68390OP
02/24/20220347
02/24/2022FEES OCT - DEC 2021 (F)
02/24/2022EL TORO & SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD 117563COUNTY OF ORANGE 149,002.00OCT - DEC 2021

0.00 ATTN: ROAD FEE TEAM - 7TH FL

SANTA ANA
Total: 68390Check No. 149,002.00
Total for COUNTY OF ORANGE 149,002.00
AZ 85072-3280

0.0002/17/2022 68345OP
02/17/202203003
02/17/2022CABLE SERVICES FEB (CM)
02/17/2022TELEPHONE, INTERNET, 117441COX COMMUNICATIONS 2,107.983601 02/01/2022

0.00 PHOENIX
Total: 68345Check No. 2,107.98
AZ 85072-3280

0.0002/24/2022 68391OP
02/24/202203003
02/24/2022
02/24/2022CABLE SERVICES FEB (CM) 117519COX COMMUNICATIONS 140.721201 02/11/2022

0.00 PHOENIX
Total: 68391Check No. 140.72
Total for COX COMMUNICATIONS 2,248.70
CA 92704

0.0002/03/2022 68261OP
02/03/2022011525
02/03/2022BASEBALL TOURNAMENT DEC (CS)
02/03/2022JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR LFSP 117284CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 186.61216400

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68261Check No. 186.61
CA 92704

0.0002/10/2022 68309OP
02/10/2022011525
02/10/2022SPORTS PARK (CS)
02/10/2022JANITORIAL SERVICES FEB 117370CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 4,856.84216546

0.00 SANTA ANA
Item: 7
42 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
12Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92704

0.0002/10/2022 68309OP
02/10/2022011525
02/10/2022TOURNAMENT JAN (CS)
02/10/2022JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR LFSP 117372CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 186.61216545

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68309Check No. 5,043.45
CA 92704

0.0002/17/2022 68346OP
02/17/2022011525
02/17/2022POLICE SERVICES (PS)
02/17/2022JANITORIAL SERVICES FEB 117445CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 774.40216547

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68346Check No. 774.40
CA 92704

0.0002/24/2022 68392OP
02/24/2022011525
02/24/2022TOURNAMENT FEB (CS)
02/24/2022JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR LFSP 117537CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 186.61216626

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68392Check No. 186.61
Total for CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 6,191.07
CA 95762

0.0002/10/2022 68310OP
02/10/2022011317
02/10/2022OCT (CD)
02/10/2022APPLIED MEDICAL EXPANSION MND 117381DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 6,912.003235

0.00 EL DORADO HILLS
CA 95762

0.0002/10/2022 68310OP
02/10/2022011317
02/10/2022JAN (CD)
02/10/2022APPLIED MEDICAL EXPANSION MND 117382DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 6,469.003362

0.00 EL DORADO HILLS
Total: 68310Check No. 13,381.00
CA 95762

0.0002/24/2022 68393OP
12/16/2021011317
12/16/2021ELEMENT (CD)
12/16/2021PLANNING SERVICES NOV HOUSING 116741DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 4,460.003303

0.00 EL DORADO HILLS
Total: 68393Check No. 4,460.00
Total for DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 17,841.00
CA 94244-2550

0.0002/03/2022 68262OP
02/03/20220438
02/03/2022FINGERPRINT DEC (MS)
02/03/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT/VOLUNTEER 117313DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 162.00555346

0.00 SACRAMENTO
Item: 7
43 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
13Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total: 68262Check No. 162.00
CA 94244-2550

0.0002/17/2022 68347OP
02/17/20220438
02/17/2022FINGERPRINT (MS)
02/17/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT JAN 117448DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

49.00560984

0.00 SACRAMENTO
Total: 68347Check No. 49.00
Total for DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 211.00
CA 91109-7214

0.0002/03/2022 68263OP
02/03/20220490
02/03/2022SKATE PARK (PW)
02/03/2022MONTHLY SERVICE JAN 117289DEWEY PEST CONTROL

40.0014835980

0.00 PASADENA
CA 91109-7214

0.0002/03/2022 68263OP
02/03/20220490
02/03/2022HEROES PARK (PW)
02/03/2022MONTHLY SERVICE JAN 117290DEWEY PEST CONTROL

35.0014835982

0.00 PASADENA
Total: 68263Check No. 75.00
CA 91109-7214

0.0002/17/2022 68348OP
02/17/20220490
02/17/2022SKATE PARK (PW)
02/17/2022MONTHLY SERVICE FEB 117421DEWEY PEST CONTROL

40.0014900908

0.00 PASADENA
CA 91109-7214

0.0002/17/2022 68348OP
02/17/20220490
02/17/2022HEROES PARK (PW)
02/17/2022MONTHLY SERVICE FEB 117422DEWEY PEST CONTROL

35.0014900910

0.00 PASADENA
Total: 68348Check No. 75.00
Total for DEWEY PEST CONTROL 150.00
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68311OP
02/10/2022011245
02/10/2022(PW)
02/10/2022FERTIGATION & AMENDMENTS DEC 117343ECOFERT INC. 3,333.005146

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68311Check No. 3,333.00
Total for ECOFERT INC. 3,333.00
Item: 7
44 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
14Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92014

0.0002/17/2022 68349OP
02/17/202205036
02/17/2022
02/17/2022PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JAN (PW) 117449ECONOMICS INC. 11,070.412021-22.7

0.00 DEL MAR
Total: 68349Check No. 11,070.41
Total for ECONOMICS INC. 11,070.41
CA 92630

0.0002/10/2022 68312OP
02/10/202205021
02/10/2022 LFSP/MPS/PARKS JAN (PW)
02/10/2022WATER SERVICES 117354EL TORO WATER DISTRICT
9,253.7622-01

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68312Check No. 9,253.76
Total for EL TORO WATER DISTRICT 9,253.76
CA 95798-9061

0.0002/24/2022 68394OP
02/24/20220538
02/24/2022OCT - DEC (MS)
02/24/2022UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 117534EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 8,769.00L1570794768

0.00 WEST SACRAMENTO
Total: 68394Check No. 8,769.00
Total for EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 8,769.00
CA 92705

0.0002/03/2022 68264OP
02/03/20220614
02/03/2022
02/03/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR (CD) 117291FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF O.C. 2,020.39JUL - SEP 2021

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/03/2022 68264OP
02/03/20220614
02/03/2022
02/03/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 2ND QTR (CD) 117292FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF O.C. 1,950.11OCT - DEC 2021

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68264Check No. 3,970.50
Total for FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF O.C. 3,970.50
CA 92673

0.0002/03/2022 68265OP
02/03/2022011274
02/03/2022(CD)
02/03/2022CDBG-CV SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR 117293FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES 9,489.21JUL - SEP 2021 CV

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
Total: 68265Check No. 9,489.21
Item: 7
45 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
15Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92673

0.0002/10/2022 68313OP
02/10/2022011274
02/10/2022(CD)
02/10/2022CDBG-CV SUBRECIPIENT 2ND QTR 117379FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES 445.35OCT - DEC 2021 CV

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
Total: 68313Check No. 445.35
Total for FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES 9,934.56
CA 92630

0.0002/10/2022 68314OP
02/10/2022010996
02/10/2022VEHICLES JAN (PW)
02/10/2022CITY MAGNETIC LOGOS FOR 117388FASTSIGNS OF LAKE FOREST 668.052016-12579

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68314Check No. 668.05
Total for FASTSIGNS OF LAKE FOREST 668.05
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68266OP
02/03/202206813
02/03/2022OWNERSHIP PROGRAM (PS)
02/03/2022RESPONSIBLE PET 10/6 117294FOOTHILL ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC

50.00125975

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68266Check No. 50.00
Total for FOOTHILL ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC 50.00
CA 92610

0.0002/17/2022 68350OP
02/17/2022011815
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER KO 30 CLASS 117451GINA SONI

72.8010750

0.00 FOOTHILL RANCH
CA 92610

0.0002/17/2022 68350OP
02/17/2022011815
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER MINDFULNESS MEDITATION 117452GINA SONI 145.6010751

0.00 FOOTHILL RANCH
Total: 68350Check No. 218.40
Total for GINA SONI 218.40
CA 92688

0.0002/17/2022 68351OP
02/17/2022010385
02/17/2022DEC (PW)
02/17/2022GEOTECH 3RD PARTY REVIEW 117512GMU GEOTECHNICAL INC. 1,765.0061039

0.00 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
Total: 68351Check No. 1,765.00
Total for GMU GEOTECHNICAL INC. 1,765.00
Item: 7
46 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
16Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 90680

0.0002/17/2022 68352OP
02/17/2022010832
02/17/2022
02/17/2022TREE MAINTENANCE JAN (PW) 117453GREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICE INC 1,081.50121554

0.00 STANTON
Total: 68352Check No. 1,081.50
Total for GREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICE INC 1,081.50
CA 90051-4598

0.0002/17/2022 68353OP
02/17/2022011361
02/17/2022CIVIC CENTER (PW)
02/17/2022SLOPE LANDSCAPE JAN 117455HABITAT RESTORATION SCIENCES 1,500.0012130

0.00 INC.

LOS ANGELES
Total: 68353Check No. 1,500.00
Total for HABITAT RESTORATION SCIENCES 1,500.00
CA 92780

0.0002/17/2022 68354OP
02/17/2022010282
02/17/2022DEVELOPMENT/CIP (PW)
02/17/2022TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEC 117456HARTZOG & CRABILL INC. 17,425.9622-0005

0.00 TUSTIN
Total: 68354Check No. 17,425.96
Total for HARTZOG & CRABILL INC. 17,425.96
CA 92821

0.0002/17/2022 68355OP
02/17/20220838
02/17/2022- MAR (F)
02/17/2022PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS JAN 117511HDL COREN & CONE 4,472.50SIN014393

0.00 BREA
Total: 68355Check No. 4,472.50
Total for HDL COREN & CONE 4,472.50
AL 35213

0.0002/03/2022 68267OP
02/03/20220937
02/03/2022
02/03/20222022 MEMBERSHIP DUES (CD) 117297INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL,INC 265.003326216

0.00 BIRMINGHAM
Total: 68267Check No. 265.00
Total for INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL,INC 265.00
CO 80308

0.0002/03/2022 68268OP
02/03/202209431
02/03/2022(CD)
02/03/2022BUILDING & SAFETY SERVICES NOV 117295INTERWEST CONSULTING 172,030.9174871

0.00 GROUP, INC.

BOULDER
Item: 7
47 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
17Page:

Taxes Withheld
CO 80308

0.0002/03/2022 68268OP
02/03/202209431
02/03/2022(CD)
02/03/2022BUILDING & SAFETY SERVICES DEC 117296INTERWEST CONSULTING 222,836.7475340

0.00 GROUP, INC.

BOULDER
Total: 68268Check No. 394,867.65
Total for INTERWEST CONSULTING 394,867.65
CA 92014

0.0002/10/2022 68315OP
02/10/2022010963
02/10/2022FEB SKATE PARK (CS)
02/10/2022WEBCAM UPGRADE 117369IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS
3,319.845133

0.00 DEL MAR
Total: 68315Check No. 3,319.84
CA 92014

0.0002/17/2022 68356OP
02/17/2022010963
02/17/2022SKATE PARK (CM)
02/17/2022VIDEO STREAMING SERVICE FEB 117458IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS 199.005148

0.00 DEL MAR
Total: 68356Check No. 199.00
Total for IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS 3,518.84
CA 92782

0.0002/03/2022 68269OP
02/03/2022011813
02/03/2022CONSULTING (PS)
02/03/2022EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN 117327JACOB GREEN
6,082.001974

0.00 TUSTIN
Total: 68269Check No. 6,082.00
Total for JACOB GREEN 6,082.00
CA 92630

0.0002/10/2022 68316OP
02/10/20221306
02/10/2022
02/10/2022BUSINESS CARDS JAN (PS) 117390JAMES L. BLACKBURN

35.1528114

0.00 MINUTEMAN PRESS

LAKE FOREST
Total: 68316Check No. 35.15
Total for JAMES L. BLACKBURN 35.15
CA 92869

0.0002/03/2022 68270OP
02/03/2022011814
02/03/2022SENIOR CENTER & STAGE DEC (PW)
02/03/2022HARDWOOD FLOOR REFRESH 117328JAMES RITCHIE
5,145.00042980

0.00 ORANGE
Total: 68270Check No. 5,145.00
Item: 7
48 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
18Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for JAMES RITCHIE 5,145.00
CA 92653

0.0002/03/2022 68271OP
02/03/202210016
02/03/2022RANCHWOOD PARK (PW)
02/03/2022CHAIN & CLEVIS REPAIR JAN 117298JAMEY CLARK INC. 202.2572955

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/03/2022 68271OP
02/03/202210016
02/03/2022(PW)
02/03/2022FAUCET REPAIR JAN HEROES PARK 117299JAMEY CLARK INC. 240.2372953

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/03/2022 68271OP
02/03/202210016
02/03/2022REPAIR JAN CONCOURSE PARK (PW)
02/03/2022RESTROOM DOOR, CLOCK, & TOILET 117300JAMEY CLARK INC. 446.2572954

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
Total: 68271Check No. 888.73
CA 92653

0.0002/17/2022 68357OP
02/17/202210016
02/17/2022JAN BORREGO PARK (PW)
02/17/2022FLOOR DRAIN & DEAD BOLT REPAIR 117459JAMEY CLARK INC. 340.0072959

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/17/2022 68357OP
02/17/202210016
02/17/2022WINDSCREENS JAN PITTSFORD PARK
02/17/2022REPLACED TENNIS COURT 117460JAMEY CLARK INC. 3,400.0072963

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/17/2022 68357OP
02/17/202210016
02/17/2022JAN CONCOURSE PARK (PW)
02/17/2022REPLACED PLEXI GLASS BACKBOARD 117461JAMEY CLARK INC. 217.1372962

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
Total: 68357Check No. 3,957.13
CA 92653

0.0002/24/2022 68395OP
02/24/202210016
02/24/2022BAKER RANCH PARK (PW)
02/24/2022SLIDE REPAIR JAN 117544JAMEY CLARK INC.
4,485.0072935

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/24/2022 68395OP
02/24/202210016
02/24/2022FEB EL TORO PARK (PW)
02/24/2022TENNIS NET TENSIONER REPAIR 117545JAMEY CLARK INC.

85.0072973

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
CA 92653

0.0002/24/2022 68395OP
02/24/202210016
02/24/2022CONCOURSE PARK (PW)
02/24/2022BOARD REPLACEMENT FEB 117546JAMEY CLARK INC. 648.9072977

0.00 LAGUNA HILLS
Total: 68395Check No. 5,218.90
Item: 7
49 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
19Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for JAMEY CLARK INC. 10,064.76
CA 91710

0.0002/17/2022 68358OP
02/17/2022011795
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER TENNIS CLASS 117457JOHN DAVID ALLEN JR. 498.4010734

0.00 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY
CHINO
Total: 68358Check No. 498.40
Total for JOHN DAVID ALLEN JR. 498.40
CA 92679

0.0002/17/2022 68359OP
02/17/2022011613
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER YOUTH TRACK 117462KENNETH CHAI
1,001.0010713

0.00 TRABUCO CANYON
CA 92679

0.0002/17/2022 68359OP
02/17/2022011613
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER YOUTH TRACK 117463KENNETH CHAI

52.5010716

0.00 TRABUCO CANYON
Total: 68359Check No. 1,053.50
Total for KENNETH CHAI 1,053.50
WA 98402

0.0002/24/2022 68396OP
02/24/2022011552
02/24/2022
02/24/2022TEAMVIEW SUBSCRIPTION DEC (PW) 117548KIDDER MATHEWS OF CALIFORNIA 611.00KMCA5132A

0.00 INC.

TACOMA
Total: 68396Check No. 611.00
Total for KIDDER MATHEWS OF CALIFORNIA 611.00
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022(CM)
02/17/2022MANAGED PRINT SERVICES DEC 117464KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 393.259008323186

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV COPIER 2B
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117465KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 136.10276829309

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV SPORTS
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117466KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

54.00276829082

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
Item: 7
50 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
20Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV COPIER 1A
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117467KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 230.11276828969

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV CLERK
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117468KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 123.19276828968

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV COPIER 2A
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117469KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 247.49276828880

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV POLICE
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117470KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

62.62276828783

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV BUILDING
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117471KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 268.25276828670

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE NOV SENIOR
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117472KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 311.18276828669

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC BUILDING
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117473KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 304.35277425688

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC SENIOR
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117474KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 138.69277425691

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC COPIER 1A
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117475KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 288.03277425790

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC COPIER 2B
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117476KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

38.11277425882

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC COPIER 2A
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117477KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 118.57277426068

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
Item: 7
51 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
21Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC SPORTS
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117478KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

53.46277426243

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC CLERK
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117479KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 168.31277426434

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
CA 91185

0.0002/17/2022 68360OP
02/17/2022011575
02/17/2022MAINTENANCE DEC POLICE
02/17/2022COPIER MONTHLY 117480KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

64.70277426534

0.00 SOLUTIONS USA INC

PASADENA
Total: 68360Check No. 3,000.41
Total for KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 3,000.41
PA 19101-1602

0.0002/17/2022 68361OP
02/17/2022011585
02/17/2022
02/17/2022COPIER LEASE FEB (CM) 117483KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANCE 1,011.4375186509

0.00 PHILADELPHIA
Total: 68361Check No. 1,011.43
Total for KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANCE 1,011.43
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68362OP
02/17/20221163
02/17/2022DUPLICATION CIVIC CENTER NOV
02/17/2022OPEN CONTROL BOX DOOR & KEY 117481KWIKEY'S LOCK AND KEY, INC. 163.81210421

0.00 LAKE FOREST
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68362OP
02/17/20221163
02/17/2022
02/17/2022ABUS 160/40 PADLOCKS FEB (PW) 117482KWIKEY'S LOCK AND KEY, INC. 320.02020422

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68362Check No. 483.83
Total for KWIKEY'S LOCK AND KEY, INC. 483.83
CA 95814

0.0002/10/2022 68317OP
02/10/20221200
02/10/2022
02/10/20222022 MEMBERSHIP DUES (CC) 117384LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 23,357.00641217

0.00 SACRAMENTO
Total: 68317Check No. 23,357.00
Item: 7
52 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
22Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 95814

0.0002/24/2022 68397OP
02/24/20221200
02/24/20222021 BERGLUND (CC)
02/24/2022NEW LAW & ELECTIONS SEMINAR 117527LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 500.00105959

0.00 SACRAMENTO
Total: 68397Check No. 500.00
Total for LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 23,857.00
CA 92614

0.0002/17/2022 68363OP
02/17/2022011522
02/17/2022NE ODOR ISSUE (PW)
02/17/2022ENV CONSULTANT PORTOLA 117484LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES INC. 998.4048965

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68363Check No. 998.40
Total for LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES INC. 998.40
CA 92672

0.0002/10/2022 68318OP
02/10/202212171
02/10/2022DEC THE MEADOWS (PW)
02/10/2022GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 117355LGC GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1,102.4001-16958

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
Total: 68318Check No. 1,102.40
Total for LGC GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1,102.40
IL 60674-5099

0.0002/03/2022 68272OP
02/03/2022011315
02/03/2022NOW FRONT-END JAN (CM)
02/03/2022COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES 117301LOOPNET
356.00115339386-1

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68272Check No. 356.00
IL 60674-5099

0.0002/24/2022 68398OP
02/24/2022011315
02/24/2022FRONT-END FEB (CM)
02/24/2022COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NOW 117525LOOPNET
356.00115566360-1

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68398Check No. 356.00
Total for LOOPNET 712.00
CA 92614

0.0002/24/2022 68399OP
02/24/20221210
02/24/2022SERVICES UP 07-21-5447 (CD)
02/24/2022ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 117533LSA ASSOCIATES INC. 1,158.75181220

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68399Check No. 1,158.75
Item: 7
53 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
23Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for LSA ASSOCIATES INC. 1,158.75
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68364OP
02/17/2022010969
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER BOOT CAMP 117485MARYAM STEVENSON
680.4010699

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68364Check No. 680.40
Total for MARYAM STEVENSON 680.40
CA 92835

0.0002/03/2022 68273OP
02/03/2022011789
02/03/2022
02/03/2022LEAFLET DESIGN JAN (MS) 117302MERRIT DEVIN DAILEY 3,000.000000256

0.00 MERRITT STUDIO, LLC

FULLERTON
Total: 68273Check No. 3,000.00
Total for MERRIT DEVIN DAILEY 3,000.00
CA 92672

0.0002/24/2022 68400OP
02/24/2022010562
02/24/2022AUG 2021 (CD)
02/24/2022CDBG & CDBG-CV CONSULTING 117530MIKE LINARES INC 3,942.5021-22-2

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
CA 92672

0.0002/24/2022 68400OP
02/24/2022010562
02/24/2022JUL 2021 (CD)
02/24/2022CDBG & CDBG-CV CONSULTING 117531MIKE LINARES INC 4,417.5021-22-1

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
CA 92672

0.0002/24/2022 68400OP
02/24/2022010562
02/24/2022SEP 2021 (CD)
02/24/2022CDBG & CDBG-CV CONSULTING 117532MIKE LINARES INC 3,705.0021-22-3

0.00 SAN CLEMENTE
Total: 68400Check No. 12,065.00
Total for MIKE LINARES INC 12,065.00
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68274OP
02/03/202202026
02/03/2022
02/03/2022UNIFORMS JAN STARS (PS) 117303MONOGRAM MAGIC 2,475.0862597

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68274Check No. 2,475.08
Item: 7
54 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
24Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68365OP
02/17/202202026
02/17/2022
02/17/2022UNIFORM BAG MUNDY (PS) 117487MONOGRAM MAGIC

6.4762770

0.00 LAKE FOREST
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68365OP
02/17/202202026
02/17/2022
02/17/2022UNIFORMS CITY MANAGER (CM) 117510MONOGRAM MAGIC 246.3862722

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68365Check No. 252.85
Total for MONOGRAM MAGIC 2,727.93
IL 60693

0.0002/17/2022 68366OP
02/17/2022010937
02/17/2022
02/17/2022RADIO RECEIVER JAN (PS) 117492MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS 5,773.168281313099

0.00 CHICAGO
Total: 68366Check No. 5,773.16
Total for MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS 5,773.16
CA 92013

0.0002/24/2022 68401OP
02/24/2022011345
02/24/2022
02/24/2022TREE MAINTENANCE FEB LFSP (PW) 117549MTR HORTICULTURE, INC. 3,225.002/16/22

0.00 CARLSBAD
Total: 68401Check No. 3,225.00
Total for MTR HORTICULTURE, INC. 3,225.00
CA 95630

0.0002/17/2022 68367OP
02/17/202213046
02/17/2022MAR JIN (CM)
02/17/2022PMP CERTIFICATION BOOT CAMP 117486MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,000.00200004269

0.00 ASSOC. OF CALIFORNIA
FOLSOM
Total: 68367Check No. 1,000.00
Total for MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,000.00
CA 95630

0.0002/10/2022 68319OP
02/10/20221323
02/10/2022DE LA PAZ (PS)
02/10/2022MEMBERSHIP DUES 2022 - 2023 117389MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT ASSOC.

90.004280

0.00 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
FOLSOM
Total: 68319Check No. 90.00
Total for MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT ASSOC. 90.00
Item: 7
55 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
25Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92705

0.0002/03/2022 68275OP
02/03/20221469
02/03/2022TRUCKS (CS)
02/03/2022SNOWFEST 01/29 WORK CREW & 117304NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 2,157.6001/26/2022

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68275Check No. 2,157.60
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022MPS/ALTON MITIGATION (PW)
02/10/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JAN 117391NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 68,637.4971216

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022EL TORO/ROCKFIELD (PW)
02/10/2022IRRIGATION DEC 117392NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC.
3,745.5071313

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022CREEKSIDE/ALISO PARK (PW)
02/10/2022IRRIGATION DEC EL TORO RD 117393NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 6,383.0071314

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022EL TORO/LAKE FOREST (PW)
02/10/2022REPLACED PLANT MATERIAL JAN 117394NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 6,625.0071315

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022VARIOUS PARKS (PW)
02/10/2022EXPAND THE FOREST DEC 117395NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 1,080.0071340

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022PASSIVE PARKS (PW)
02/10/2022MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JAN 117396NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 67,963.7671215

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022TRABUCO/RIDGE ROUTE (PW)
02/10/2022REPLACED PLANT MATERIAL JAN 117397NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 8,550.0071316

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022EL TORO/FRONT ST SLOPE (PW)
02/10/2022REPLACED PLANT MATERIAL JAN 117398NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 14,400.0071317

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022ROCKFIELD/EL TORO (PW)
02/10/2022INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL JAN 117399NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 2,060.0071318

0.00 SANTA ANA
Item: 7
56 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
26Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022EL TORO, JERONIMO,LAKE FOREST
02/10/2022IRRIGATION REPAIRS DEC-JAN 117400NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 1,197.0071319

0.00 SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68320OP
02/10/20221469
02/10/2022RIDGE ROUTE/EL TORO RD (PW)
02/10/2022ELECTRICAL REPAIRS JAN 117401NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 1,595.5071320

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68320Check No. 182,237.25
CA 92705

0.0002/17/2022 68368OP
02/17/20221469
02/17/2022JAN WHISPERING HILLS (PW)
02/17/2022WEEDS REMOVAL & TREE TRIMMING 117489NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 4,400.0071361

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68368Check No. 4,400.00
Total for NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC. 188,794.85
CA 92663

0.0002/24/2022 68402OP
02/24/20221407
02/24/2022FEB (CC)
02/24/2022VARIOUS FLAGS REPLENISHMENT 117522NIKKI'S FLAG SHOP 536.245885

0.00 NEWPORT BEACH
Total: 68402Check No. 536.24
Total for NIKKI'S FLAG SHOP 536.24
CA 91729-3700

0.0002/03/2022 68276OP
02/03/2022011457
02/03/2022AND TESTING JAN (MS)
02/03/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 117305OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS

47.0074121963

0.00 OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL CORP

RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Total: 68276Check No. 47.00
CA 91729-3700

0.0002/10/2022 68321OP
02/10/2022011457
02/10/2022TESTING JAN (MS)
02/10/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS AND 117366OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS

94.0074049834

0.00 OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL CORP

RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Total: 68321Check No. 94.00
CA 91729-3700

0.0002/24/2022 68403OP
02/24/2022011457
02/24/2022TESTING FEB (MS)
02/24/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS AND 117536OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS

91.0074341619

0.00 OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL CORP

RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Item: 7
57 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
27Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total: 68403Check No. 91.00
Total for OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 232.00
AZ 85038

0.0002/17/2022 68369OP
02/17/202215201
02/17/2022
02/17/2022OPERATING SUPPLIES JAN (F) 117490OFFICE DEPOT 838.1420984984

0.00 PHOENIX
Total: 68369Check No. 838.14
Total for OFFICE DEPOT 838.14
CA 90242

0.0002/17/2022 68370OP
02/17/2022011755
02/17/2022DISPENSARY (CD)
02/17/2022BOARD-UP SERVICES FEB 117491PATTY NORTHCOTT
1,120.000070

0.00 THE BOARD UP LADY,LLC
DOWNEY
Total: 68370Check No. 1,120.00
Total for PATTY NORTHCOTT 1,120.00
OH 44135

0.0002/10/2022 68322OP
02/10/2022011195
02/10/2022
02/10/2022FIELD SUPPLIES JAN PAINT (CS) 117374PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 2,472.68INV823120

0.00 CLEVELAND
Total: 68322Check No. 2,472.68
Total for PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 2,472.68
PA 15250-7896

0.0002/24/2022 68404OP
02/24/20221678
02/24/2022INK & SEALER FEB (CC)
02/24/2022POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES 117558PITNEY BOWES, INC. 382.771019996866

0.00 PITTSBURGH
Total: 68404Check No. 382.77
Total for PITNEY BOWES, INC. 382.77
PA 15250-7887

0.0002/10/2022 68323OP
02/10/20221611
02/10/202202/27/22 (CC)
02/10/2022POSTAGE METER LEASE 11/28/21 - 117383PITNEY BOWES 899.213105290979

0.00 PITTSBURGH
Total: 68323Check No. 899.21
Total for PITNEY BOWES 899.21
Item: 7
58 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
28Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92679

0.0002/24/2022 68405OP
02/24/2022011203
02/24/2022FEB (PW)
02/24/2022GYM PRO COURT DUST MOP KITS 117547PRO LINE GYM FLOORS INC. 630.342712

0.00 COTO DE CAZA
Total: 68405Check No. 630.34
Total for PRO LINE GYM FLOORS INC. 630.34
NY 10005-4024

0.0002/10/2022 68324OP
02/10/20221683
02/10/2022VOLZKE (MS)
02/10/2022MEMBERSHIP DUES MAR 117368PUBLIC RELATIONS SOCIETY OF 335.0002/02/2022

0.00 AMERICA

NEW YORK
Total: 68324Check No. 335.00
Total for PUBLIC RELATIONS SOCIETY OF 335.00
CA 90242

0.0002/03/2022 68277OP
02/03/2022011621
02/03/2022
02/03/2022ARTERIAL/RES SWEEPING DEC (PW) 117307R.F. DICKSON CO., INC. 32,480.262511143

0.00 DOWNEY
Total: 68277Check No. 32,480.26
CA 90242

0.0002/17/2022 68371OP
02/17/2022011621
02/17/2022JAN (PW)
02/17/2022ARTERIAL/RES SWEEPING 117495R.F. DICKSON CO., INC. 32,480.262511207

0.00 DOWNEY
Total: 68371Check No. 32,480.26
Total for R.F. DICKSON CO., INC. 64,960.52
CA 92799-5091

0.0002/03/2022 68278OP
02/03/202218240
02/03/2022MAR PTM-108-702MD-1 (CD)
02/03/202222702 MADRID HOA PAYMENT 117325RANCHO VIEJO II HOA 380.0022702 02/01/2022

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68278Check No. 380.00
CA 92799-5091

0.0002/03/2022 68279OP
02/03/202218240
02/03/2022MAR PTM-108-706MD-1 (CD)
02/03/202222706 MADRID HOA PAYMENT 117326RANCHO VIEJO II HOA 380.0022706 02/01/2022

0.00 SANTA ANA
Total: 68279Check No. 380.00
Total for RANCHO VIEJO II HOA 760.00
Item: 7
59 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
29Page:

Taxes Withheld
KY 40285-6158

0.0002/03/2022 68280OP
02/03/20220169
02/03/2022CITY HALL (F)
02/03/2022OPERATING SUPPLIES DEC/JAN 117306READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 3,522.0312A0031546419

0.00 LOUISVILLE
Total: 68280Check No. 3,522.03
Total for READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 3,522.03
CA 92110

0.0002/10/2022 68325OP
02/10/202223481
02/10/2022DEC PW 2019-02 (PW)
02/10/2022BAKE/ TRABUCO ULTIMATE 117356RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 572.500085764

0.00 SAN DIEGO
CA 92110

0.0002/10/2022 68325OP
02/10/202223481
02/10/2022DEC PW 2019-03 (PW)
02/10/2022EL TORO / PORTOLA PKWY DESIGN 117357RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 6,202.5018291C(27)

0.00 SAN DIEGO
Total: 68325Check No. 6,775.00
Total for RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 6,775.00
CA 92675

0.0002/10/2022 68326OP
02/10/20221833
02/10/2022(PW)
02/10/2022ARBORS MINI PARK NW SIDE DEC 117358RJM DESIGN GROUP INC. 1,225.6034809

0.00 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Total: 68326Check No. 1,225.60
Total for RJM DESIGN GROUP INC. 1,225.60
CA 92694

0.0002/17/2022 68372OP
02/17/20221895
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER GUITAR/UKULELE 117493RON GORMAN

63.0010711

0.00 LADERA RANCH
CA 92694

0.0002/17/2022 68372OP
02/17/20221895
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER GUITAR/UKULELE 117494RON GORMAN
126.0010710

0.00 LADERA RANCH
Total: 68372Check No. 189.00
Total for RON GORMAN 189.00
Item: 7
60 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
30Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 92614

0.0002/24/2022 68406OP
02/24/20221802
02/24/2022ANALYSIS JAN (CD)
02/24/2022AFFORDABLE HOUSING OUTREACH 117526ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC 2,756.25I008275

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68406Check No. 2,756.25
Total for ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC 2,756.25
TX 75284-1868

0.0002/03/2022 68281OP
02/03/2022011730
02/03/2022SUPPORT (CM)
02/03/2022ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM 117310SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS 520.00868990

0.00 AMERICAS INC
DALLAS
TX 75284-1868

0.0002/03/2022 68281OP
02/03/2022011730
02/03/2022SUPPORT (CM)
02/03/2022ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM 117311SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS 702.50864393

0.00 AMERICAS INC
DALLAS
Total: 68281Check No. 1,222.50
Total for SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS 1,222.50
NY 10008-5246

0.0002/03/2022 68282OP
02/03/2022010124
02/03/2022
02/03/2022MUSIC LICENSING FEE 2022 (CS) 117312SESAC
1,669.0010532846

0.00 NEW YORK
Total: 68282Check No. 1,669.00
Total for SESAC 1,669.00
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68373OP
02/17/2022011745
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER PICKLEBALL 117496SHELLY BOOTH
637.0010686

0.00 LAKE FOREST
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68373OP
02/17/2022011745
02/17/2022INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT (CS)
02/17/2022WINTER PICKLEBALL 117497SHELLY BOOTH
735.0010690

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68373Check No. 1,372.00
Total for SHELLY BOOTH 1,372.00
OH 45263-1186

0.0002/24/2022 68407OP
02/24/2022011713
02/24/2022JAN (PW)
02/24/2022BUS SHELTER MAINTENANCE 117542SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 2,732.20698759

0.00 CINCINNATI
Item: 7
61 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
31Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total: 68407Check No. 2,732.20
Total for SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 2,732.20
CA 91746

0.0002/17/2022 68374OP
02/17/2022010509
02/17/2022(CS)
02/17/2022PORTALET RENTALS 01/25 - 02/21 117498SO CAL INDUSTRIES 109.08545881

0.00 CITY OF INDUSTRY
Total: 68374Check No. 109.08
Total for SO CAL INDUSTRIES 109.08
CA 92618

0.0002/03/2022 68283OP
02/03/20221957
02/03/2022
02/03/2022CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR (CD) 117308SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH 4,812.50JUL - SEP 2021

0.00 IRVINE
CA 92618

0.0002/03/2022 68283OP
02/03/20221957
02/03/2022(CD)
02/03/2022CDBG-CV SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR 117309SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH 841.22JUL - SEP 2021 HHP

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68283Check No. 5,653.72
CA 92618

0.0002/10/2022 68327OP
02/10/20221957
02/10/2022(CD)
02/10/2022CDBG-CV SUBRECIPIENT 2ND QTR 117376SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH

44.78OCT - DEC 2021 HHP

0.00 IRVINE
Total: 68327Check No. 44.78
Total for SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH 5,698.50
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/03/2022 68284OP
02/03/20220508
02/03/2022DEC (PW)
02/03/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL UTILITIES 117317SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,736.875025 01/18/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
Total: 68284Check No. 6,736.87
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022(PW)
02/17/2022STREET LIGHT UTILITIES JAN 117501SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72,216.413106 02/04/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
Item: 7
62 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
32Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022(PW)
02/17/2022STREET LIGHT UTILITIES JAN 117502SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

96.421157 02/02/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022CIVIC CENTER (PW)
02/17/2022STREET LIGHT UTILITIES JAN 117503SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

56.645146 02/03/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022(PW)
02/17/2022STREET LIGHT UTILITIES JAN 117504SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

80.409256 02/02/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022(PW)
02/17/2022STREET LIGHT UTILITIES JAN 117505SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

96.983125 02/02/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/17/2022 68375OP
02/17/20220508
02/17/2022(PW)
02/17/2022PORTOLA PARK UTILITIES JAN 117506SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

67.021549 02/03/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
Total: 68375Check No. 72,613.87
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/24/2022 68408OP
02/24/20220508
02/24/2022PARKING GARAGE JAN (PW)
02/24/2022CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES 117554SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,447.878114 02/08/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/24/2022 68408OP
02/24/20220508
02/24/2022(PW)
02/24/2022CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES JAN 117555SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,145.378477 02/08/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/24/2022 68408OP
02/24/20220508
02/24/2022LFSP, BUS SHELTERS (PW)
02/24/2022PARK UTILITIES JAN PARKS, MPS, 117556SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,386.703611 02/14/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
CA 91772-0002

0.0002/24/2022 68408OP
02/24/20220508
02/24/2022(PW)
02/24/2022TRAFFIC SIGNAL UTILITIES JAN 117557SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,007.575025 02/15/2022

0.00 ROSEMEAD
Total: 68408Check No. 36,987.51
Total for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116,338.25
Item: 7
63 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
33Page:

Taxes Withheld
OH 44096-8012

0.0002/10/2022 68328OP
02/10/2022011603
02/10/2022
02/10/2022PUBLIC NOTICES DEC 1-31 (CC) 117385SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 5,100.000000532249

0.00 WILLOUGHBY
Total: 68328Check No. 5,100.00
OH 44096-8012

0.0002/24/2022 68409OP
02/24/2022011603
02/24/2022
02/24/2022PUBLIC NOTICES JAN 1-31 (CC) 117523SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 2,686.000000534498

0.00 WILLOUGHBY
Total: 68409Check No. 2,686.00
Total for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 7,786.00
CA 92630

0.0002/17/2022 68376OP
02/17/2022011427
02/17/2022I.D. THEFT (PS)
02/17/2022SHREDDING SERVICES JAN 117507SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHREDDING 840.00189583

0.00 INC.

LAKE FOREST
Total: 68376Check No. 840.00
Total for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHREDDING 840.00
CA 92879

0.0002/10/2022 68329OP
02/10/2022011807
02/10/2022ST-011427 LFSP NOV (PW)
02/10/2022COURT RESURFACE PROJECT 117348SPECTRASYSTEMS, INC. 8,087.0017311R

0.00 DBA SPECTRATURF
CORONA
CA 92879

0.0002/10/2022 68329OP
02/10/2022011807
02/10/2022ST-011426 PITTSFORD PARK NOV
02/10/2022COURT RESURFACE PROJECT 117349SPECTRASYSTEMS, INC. 6,849.4017324R

0.00 DBA SPECTRATURF
CORONA
Total: 68329Check No. 14,936.40
Total for SPECTRASYSTEMS, INC. 14,936.40
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68285OP
02/03/2022191671
02/03/2022ANNUAL COMP FINANCIAL REP (F)
02/03/2022PRINTING SERVICES JAN FY 20-21 117314STUDIO TWO * BLACK DIAMOND 311.9798245

0.00 PRINTING & GRAPHICS

LAKE FOREST
Total: 68285Check No. 311.97
Total for STUDIO TWO * BLACK DIAMOND 311.97
Item: 7
64 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
34Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 90660-4512

0.0002/17/2022 68377OP
02/17/2022010654
02/17/2022HAZMAT RESPONSE JAN (PW)
02/17/2022ILLEGAL DISCHARGE EMERGENCY 117499SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 750.0017238

0.00 PICO RIVERA
CA 90660-4512

0.0002/17/2022 68377OP
02/17/2022010654
02/17/2022JAN VARIOUS PARKS (PW)
02/17/2022GRAFFITI REMOVAL & STEAM 117500SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 13,675.0017245

0.00 PICO RIVERA
Total: 68377Check No. 14,425.00
Total for SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 14,425.00
CA 94966

0.0002/03/2022 68286OP
02/03/2022011764
02/03/2022DEC (CD)
02/03/2022MIXED USE ZONING CODE UPDATES 117316SWA GROUP INC 8,312.50188559

0.00 SAUSALITO
Total: 68286Check No. 8,312.50
Total for SWA GROUP INC 8,312.50
CA 95812-1888

0.0002/03/2022 68287OP
02/03/202219044
02/03/2022FEES 10/01/21 - 09/30/22 (PW)
02/03/2022PERMIT WASTE DISCHARGE 117315SWRCB
35,333.00SW-0223087

0.00 SACRAMENTO
Total: 68287Check No. 35,333.00
Total for SWRCB 35,333.00
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68330OP
02/10/2022010986
02/10/2022JERONIMO/EL TORO DEC (PW)
02/10/2022WIDENING/REALIGNMENT 117359TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,597.50145745

0.00 ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

SANTA ANA
CA 92705

0.0002/10/2022 68330OP
02/10/2022010986
02/10/2022ROAD PW 2020-05B (PW)
02/10/2022STREET RESURFACING GLEN RANCH 117360TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,528.85145746

0.00 ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

SANTA ANA
Total: 68330Check No. 5,126.35
Total for TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC. 5,126.35
CA 91756

0.0002/24/2022 68410OP
02/24/20221937
02/24/2022(PW)
02/24/2022CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES JAN 117551THE GAS COMPANY 2,402.079109 02/10/2022

0.00 MONTEREY PARK
Item: 7
65 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
35Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 91756

0.0002/24/2022 68410OP
02/24/20221937
02/24/2022
02/24/2022SPORTS PARK UTILITIES JAN (PW) 117552THE GAS COMPANY 407.602943 02/11/2022

0.00 MONTEREY PARK
Total: 68410Check No. 2,809.67
Total for THE GAS COMPANY 2,809.67
CA 92630

0.0002/03/2022 68288OP
02/03/2022011398
02/03/2022
02/03/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT DEC (MS) 117319THE UPS STORE 0026

90.00TCLF12210026

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68288Check No. 90.00
CA 92630

0.0002/24/2022 68411OP
02/24/2022011398
02/24/2022
02/24/2022PRE-EMPLOYMENT JAN (MS) 117535THE UPS STORE 0026 135.00TCLF01220026

0.00 LAKE FOREST
Total: 68411Check No. 135.00
Total for THE UPS STORE 0026 225.00
CA 92691

0.0002/17/2022 68378OP
02/17/20220814
02/17/2022
02/17/2022CONSULTING SERVICES JAN (CD) 117508THERESA DOBBS 2,697.5002/01/2022

0.00 MISSION VIEJO
Total: 68378Check No. 2,697.50
Total for THERESA DOBBS 2,697.50
CA 92679

0.0002/03/2022 68289OP
02/03/2022010570
02/03/2022CIVIC CENTER (PW)
02/03/2022HOLIDAY LIGHTING NOV 117320THOMAS J. O'CONNELL 601.29INV-2022-104

0.00 DBA: LAKE FOREST ELECTRIC

TRABUCO CANYON
Total: 68289Check No. 601.29
Total for THOMAS J. O'CONNELL 601.29
CA 92679-3715

0.0002/03/2022 68290OP
02/03/2022011759
02/03/2022PORTOLA METER DEC (PW)
02/03/2022MPS UTILITY EL TORO RD / 117318TRABUCO CANYON WATER DISTRICT 123.1501/18/2022

0.00 TRABUCO CANYON
Total: 68290Check No. 123.15
Item: 7
66 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
36Page:

Taxes Withheld
Total for TRABUCO CANYON WATER DISTRICT 123.15
CA 93012

0.0002/10/2022 68331OP
02/10/2022011079
02/10/2022SPRING LEAGUE JAN (CS)
02/10/2022ADULT SOFTBALL SUPPLIES 117371TRIAD SPORTS GROUP LLC 1,401.350340619

0.00 DBA: BOWNET SPORTS

CAMARILLO
Total: 68331Check No. 1,401.35
Total for TRIAD SPORTS GROUP LLC 1,401.35
CA 92619

0.0002/03/2022 68291OP
02/03/2022011454
02/03/2022
02/03/2022AV FOR PAC PAGEANT EVENT (MS) 117321TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 1,322.507344

0.00 INC
IRVINE
Total: 68291Check No. 1,322.50
Total for TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 1,322.50
MO 63179-0428

0.0002/17/2022 68379OP
02/17/20222128
02/17/2022
02/17/2022CAL-CARD PURCHASES JAN 117513U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 20,913.324348 2022-01-25

0.00 SYSTEMS
ST. LOUIS
MO 63179-0428

0.0002/17/2022 68379OP
02/17/20222128
02/17/2022
02/17/2022CAL-CARD PURCHASES JAN 117514U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 1,579.046249 2022-01-25

0.00 SYSTEMS
ST. LOUIS
Total: 68379Check No. 22,492.36
Total for U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 22,492.36
CA 92877-0102

0.0002/10/2022 68332OP
02/10/2022011138
02/10/2022ANNUAL FEE 2021 DIG (PW)
02/10/2022UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 117344UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 457.82DSB20210020

0.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CORONA
CA 92877-0102

0.0002/10/2022 68332OP
02/10/2022011138
02/10/2022NOTIFICATIONS JAN (PW)
02/10/2022UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT 117345UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 249.25120220374

0.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CORONA
Total: 68332Check No. 707.07
Total for UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 707.07
Item: 7
67 1:26 pm
02/24/2022

INVOICE APPROVAL LIST REPORT - DETAIL

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Time:

Date:
37Page:

Taxes Withheld
CA 90670

0.0002/10/2022 68333OP
02/10/2022011620
02/10/2022(PW)
02/10/2022PARK JANITORIAL SERVICES JAN 117364VALLEY MAINTENANCE CORP. 3,862.0027740

0.00 SANTA FE SPRINGS
Total: 68333Check No. 3,862.00
Total for VALLEY MAINTENANCE CORP. 3,862.00
TX 75266-0108

0.0002/03/2022 68292OP
02/03/2022010673
02/03/2022SERVICE JAN (CM)
02/03/2022CELLULAR PHONES AND DATA 117323VERIZON WIRELESS 1,162.479897195414

0.00 DALLAS
Total: 68292Check No. 1,162.47
TX 75266-0108

0.0002/24/2022 68412OP
02/24/2022010673
02/24/2022SERVICE FEB (CM)
02/24/2022VETERANS PARK CCTV DATA 117520VERIZON WIRELESS 263.649899059533

0.00 DALLAS
Total: 68412Check No. 263.64
Total for VERIZON WIRELESS 1,426.11
MO 63195-2818

0.0002/03/2022 68293OP
02/03/20222212
02/03/2022CE, CM)
02/03/2022CITY VEHICLE FUEL JAN (PS, PW, 117322VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC. 1,280.148690611272205

0.00 SAINT LOUIS
Total: 68293Check No. 1,280.14
Total for VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC. 1,280.14
GA 30353-2306

0.0002/17/2022 68380OP
02/17/2022011495
02/17/2022DEC 2021 PW 2017-17B (PW)
02/17/2022NEIGHBORHOOD PARK RENO 117509WALLACE & ASSOCIATES 1,652.00W800081

0.00 CONSULTING INC.

ATLANTA
Total: 68380Check No. 1,652.00
Total for WALLACE & ASSOCIATES 1,652.00

0.00 0.00
4,083,620.58
4,083,620.58
4,083,620.58
Net Total:

Less Hand Check Total:

Grand Total:

Total Invoices: 245 Less Credit Memos:

Outstanding Invoice Total:

Item: 7
68 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/01/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT WITH ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES FOR

CITYWIDE PLAYGROUND RESURFACING/REPLACING PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Approve contract documents for Citywide Playground Resurfacing/ Replacement Project (PW 2021-08).

2. Award a contract to Robertson Industries, Inc. with a contract price of $207,230.

3. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from Robertson Industries, Inc.

4. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2021-2028 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

5. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with Robertson Industries Inc., as submitted to form.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Several parks within the city include rubberized surfaces within playgrounds, tot lots, and other play areas. These rubberized surfaces provide impact attenuation and mitigate health hazards if children fall while utilizing playground equipment and other park amenities. On an annual basis, the Public Works Department assesses the useful condition of these rubberized surfaces. Over time, ultraviolet (“UV”) radiation present in sunlight causes the rubberized surfaces to deteriorate.

In response, the City must replace the rubberized surfaces that have deteriorated beyond their useful life.

As part of the 2021-28 Capital Improvement Plan, staff identified rubberized surfaces in Baker Ranch Community Park and the El Toro Park that require complete replacement to meet the impact attenuation standards recommended Item: 8
69 1
8 5
2 by the American Society for Testing and Materials International (“ASTM”). On December 23rd and 30th, 2021, staff published the competitive bid package for the Citywide Playground Resurfacing/Replacement Project for the reconstruction of rubberized playground surfaces at Baker Ranch Community Park and the El Toro Park. The contract plans and specifications are not attached to the staff report due to their size; however, they are available for review in the City Clerk’s Office and will be on display in the City Council Chambers before and during the City Council meeting. Staff has attached the title sheet for the project (Attachment 1).

On January 19, 2022, staff received bids and identified the lowest responsive, responsible bidder to be Robertson Industries, Inc. (“Robertson”). Robertson’s bid amount is $207,230, which is above the current budget. Therefore, staff is requesting a budget adjustment of $35,358 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $20,723, for a total budget adjustment of $56,081. Staff recommends the City Council approve the contract documents and award the Contract to Robertson (Attachment 2) to complete the construction phase of the project.

BACKGROUND:

Several parks within the city include rubberized surfaces within playgrounds, tot lots, and other play areas that are designed to provide impact attenuation. Impact attenuation is critical to reduce injuries to children should they fall from the playground equipment. Over time, the rubberized surface begins to deteriorate due to ultraviolet (“UV”) radiation present in sunlight. The surface can become granulated wherein rubber particles wear off from the surface and the rubberized material begins to harden. As part of the 2021-28 Capital Improvement Plan, staff identified rubberized surfaces in Baker Ranch Community Park and El Toro Park that require complete replacement to meet the impact attenuation standards recommended by the ASTM. Resurfacing of playgrounds is performed on an as- needed basis when the surface begins to crack, peel, or no longer meets head attenuation standards. In this situation, both parks have exceeded their usefulness and require complete replacement to comply with safety standards.

DISCUSSION:

The scope of work for the proposed project includes the complete removal and installation of a new rubberized playground surface for both Baker Ranch Community Park and El Toro Park. Per the scope of work, the contractor would remove the existing playground surface and reinstall new rubberized material.

Next, the contractor would apply a texture coat to the playground surface to provide the necessary surface grip and cushion to meet ASTM standards.

Finally, the contractor would apply a color coating that seals in the texture coat and matches the existing playground surface color. The surface will require a Item: 8
70 1
8 5
2 clean urethane sealer topcoat every two to three years to extend the longevity of the playground surface. A complete reinstallation will not be necessary for eight to ten years.

In the memorandum dated December 10, 2021, the City Manager authorized staff to solicit bids for rubberized surface replacement projects. On January 19, 2022, the City received bids from five firms, with bids ranging from $207,229.20 to $470,991.29. The engineer’s estimate for this project is $140,000.

Staff reviewed Robertson’s bid package for completeness and accuracy. The electronic bidding system that the City uses, PlanetBids, eliminates mathematical errors in the bids. Therefore, the submitted bid results are provided in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Bid Results
Bidder PlanetBids - Base Bid Amounts
Robertson Industries $207,229.20
Diamond Construction $267,490.00
ORTCO, Inc. $339,080.25
No Fault, LLC $340,170.60
The Labor Solution, LLC $470,991.29
After analysis of the bids received, staff determined that Robertson was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for this project. Robertson has completed projects in the cities of Irvine, Jurupa Valley, Scottsdale, and Oxnard. Staff conducted a reference check that indicated Robertson to be a responsible contractor (Attachment 4).

The total project cost to construct and provide a contingency for the project is estimated to be $227,953. The project budget does not include sufficient funding to complete the work and provide for a 10% contingency. An additional $56,081 in budgetary authority is necessary to complete the project. The recommended actions include approving a resolution (Attachment 3) to amend the 2021-2028 Capital Improvement Plan to increase the project funding by $56,081.

The Finance Department prepared the Contract and the City Attorney reviewed and approved the Contract as to form. The contract bid amount as determined by the bid quantities is $207,229.20. Per Lake Forest Municipal Code Section

3.13.085, the City Manager may approve additional work, so long as that additional work does not-to-exceed 10% of the original contract amount. The contract plans and specifications for this project are not included in this agenda report due to their size. However, they are available for review upon request in the Office of the City Clerk.

Item: 8
71 1
8 5
2 FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of the recommended actions includes an award a contract to Robertson Industries, Inc. with a contract price of $207,223 and an amendment to the 2021-2028 Capital Improvement Plan budget in the amount of $56,081.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Title Sheet

2. Contract with Robertson Industries, Inc.

3. Resolution 2022-XX

4. Reference Check
Initiated By: Michael McConaha, Public Works Maintenance Manager Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 8
72 Attachment 1
Item: 8
73 Item: 8
74 Attachment 2
Item: 8
75 Item: 8
76 Item: 8
77 Item: 8
78 5
0 1
6 9
ATTACHMENT 3
Item: 8
79 5
0 1
6 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE 2021-2028 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN;

AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2021-22
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Plan for 2021-28 and the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2021-22 were adopted by the City Council on June 15, 2021; and
WHEREAS, modifications are now required as a result of changes during Fiscal Year 2021-22;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council’s adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, the City’s adoption of the Resolution is an administrative and fiscal function of the City that does not commit the City to any specific project or course of action. (State CEQA Guidelines, sections 15378(b)(4) & (b)(5).) Thus, no environmental review of the Resolution is required. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption within five working days of the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Capital Improvement Plan for 2021-2028, is hereby amended as described per Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Clerk shall attest as to the adoption and execution of this Resolution and cause the same to be maintained in the permanent records of the City.

Item: 8
80 5
0 1
6 9
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of March 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
_________________________
ROBERT PEQUEÑO
MAYOR
ATTEST:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the 1st day of March, 2021, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
Item: 8
81 5
0 1
6 9

EXHIBIT A

AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2021-2028
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Funding
Source
Project Current
Budget
Addition Amended
Appropriation
General
Fund
Park Playground
Resurfacing
$470,600 $56,081 $526,681
Item: 8
82 Attachment 4
Item: 8
83 Apparent Low Bidder: Robertson Industries, Inc. Contact #1: Contact #2: Contact #3:

Irvine Jurupa Scottsdale
Name Joe Muller Travis Viseth Ron Steffen
Phone No. or Email (949) 724-7707 (951) 727-3524 (480) 316-5656

QUESTION RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE

1. Title and type of project Playground Resurfacing Playground Resurfacing Playground Resurfacing

2. Contract Amount $160,502 $24,985 $6,938

3. Approximate duration Two Weeks N/A N/A

4. Actual or estimated project completion date 9/9/2014 2/26/2021 4/30/2018

5. Quality of the work 5 5 4

6. Similarity of the Project 5 5 4

7. Contractor’s relationship with agency representatives 5 (5) Excellent 4

8. Claims or stop notices No No No

9. Change order requests No No Yes from contractor

10. Agency’s desire to have contractor bid on future projects Yes Yes Yes

11. Additional Comments N/A Great to work with. No

CITY OF LAKE FOREST

D E P A R T M E N T O F P U B L I C W O R K S

REFERENCE CHECK FOR
Bid For Park Playground Resurfacing
Questions 5,6,7
Rating Scale: 5 - Very Good, 4 - Good, 3 - OK, 2 - Poor, 1 - Very Poor Questions 8,9,10 - Yes or No
Item: 8
84 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT:

AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTERS 7.50 AND 9.52 TO THE LAKE FOREST

MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT

AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS REGULATING URBAN LOT SPLITS AND

TWO-UNIT HOUSING PROJECTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Introduce for first reading an Ordinance Entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ADDING CHAPTERS 7.50 AND

9.52 TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE

DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS REGULATING

URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT HOUSING PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The proposed ordinance implements California Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) by adding Chapters 7.50 and 9.52 to the Lake Forest Municipal Code (Municipal Code) to establish objective design, development and subdivision standards for specified lot splits and two-unit housing projects. SB 9 requires cities to allow (a) any single-family residential lot in any single-family residential zone to be subdivided, roughly into halves, with resulting lots as small as 1,200 sq.-ft. and (b) up to two single-family dwellings to be developed on an undivided single-family residential lot or on each half of a subdivided single-family residential lot — through ministerial review. Staff recommends the City Council conduct the first reading of the attached ordinance (“Ordinance”) (Attachment 1).

BACKGROUND:

The California legislature recently passed, and Governor Newsom signed into law, SB 9. SB 9 became effective on January 1, 2022 and requires the City to both: (1) allow any lot in a single-family residential zone to be split, roughly into Item: 9
85 1
8 7
3 halves, with resulting lots as small as 1,200 sq.-ft. and (2) allow any lot in a single-family residential zone to be developed with up to two single-family primary dwellings. SB 9 requires the City to approve eligible lot splits and two- unit projects ministerially (i.e., without discretionary review, conditions, or a hearing). Property owners can also utilize both of SB 9’s provisions, meaning that an SB 9 lot split may be followed with an SB 9 two-unit project on each of the two new lots, resulting in four total dwellings on what was formerly one single- family residential lot — all with only ministerial approval.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Ordinance at a public hearing on February 3, 2022. The Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the Ordinance by the City Council (Attachment 2). No public comments were presented at this meeting.

ANALYSIS:

SB 9 allows cities to impose objective design, development, and subdivision standards (collectively “objective development standards”) on covered lot splits and two-unit projects. An objective standard is a regulation that does not involve personal or subjective judgment and that is verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion (e.g., a height limit).

The proposed Ordinance establishes such standards for SB 9 projects in the City, as well as provisions for applying for the required permits. Among other things, the ordinance includes regulations governing minimum lot size, required easements, lot access, unit size, maximum height, minimum setbacks, architecture, landscaping, and fire safety. The table below summarizes the proposed standards, not including architectural and landscaping requirements:

Min. Lot Size Before Split: 2,400 sq.-ft.

Min. Lot Size After Split: 1,200 sq.-ft. (each lot)
Max./Min. Lot Size as % of Original
Lot: 60/40
Min. Lot Frontage Along Public Street: 12.5 ft.

Max. Number of Units/Lot, After Lot
Split: 2
Max. Number of Units – No Lot Split: 2 plus any ADU or JADU allowed Max./Min. Unit Size – New Units: 800/500 sq.-ft.

Max. Unit Size – Existing Units: Existing Size or 800 sq.-ft., whichever is greater
Item: 9
86 1
8 7
3 Max. Height – Lots >2,000 sq.-ft.: 1 story/16 ft.

Max. Height – Lots <2,000 sq.-ft.: 2 stories/22 ft.

Min. Setbacks: Per applicable zone, except:
No setback required for existing
legally established structure or for
new structure constructed at same
location and same dimensions as
existing legally established
structure
Setbacks applicable in
corresponding zone must yield to
degree necessary to avoid
precluding construction of up to 2
units on lot or either of the two
units from being at least 800 sq.-ft.;
but in no event may any structure
be less than 4 ft. from side or rear
property line.
Front Setback for New Structures:
25 ft.; 50% landscaped
Min. Parking: 1 space/unit, except when within ½-
mile walking distance of a corridor
with fixed route bus service with
service intervals no longer than 15
minutes during peak commute hours
In the absence of the proposed Ordinance, the City would thereafter be limited to applying the Municipal Code’s existing objective development standards — which did not anticipate and were not enacted with ministerially-approved lot splits and two-unit projects in mind.

Existing objective development standards vary by zone, but are generally limited to minimum site area, maximum building height, minimum setbacks, and required parking, most of which are superseded by SB 9-imposed standards. Approving such projects based solely on the Municipal Code’s existing standards would, among other things, threaten the character of existing neighborhoods and negatively impact property values, personal privacy, and fire safety.

For these reasons, staff is recommending adoption of the Ordinance (Attachment 1). The ordinance requires a first and second reading before the City Council and would take effect 30 days after the second reading.

Item: 9
87 1
8 7
3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Under California Government Code sections 65852.21, subdivision (j), and 66411.7, subdivision (n), the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Government Code sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 (SB 9) and regulating urban lot splits and two-unit projects is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Therefore, adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA in that the proposed ordinance implements these new laws enacted by SB 9.

PUBLIC NOTICING:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 9.184.040(C)(2) of the Municipal Code of the City of Lake Forest, a public hearing notice for this item was published in a newspaper of general circulation on February 17, 2022. In addition, on February 17, 2022, public notices were posted at City Hall.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Ordinance Adding LFMC Chapters 7.50 and 9.52

2. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Adoption of Draft Ordinance
Initiated By: Ron Santos, Senior Planner
Submitted By: Gayle Ackerman, Director of Community Development Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 9
88 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 ATTACHMENT 1
Item: 9
89 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 ORDINANCE NO. ________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE FOREST ADDING CHAPTERS 7.50 AND 9.52

TO THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE

TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN,

DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS

REGULATING URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT

HOUSING PROJECTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 AND DETERMINING
THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Lake Forest, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 9 (“SB 9”), which among other things, adds Government Code section 65852.21 and 66411.7 to impose new limits on local authority to regulate urban lot splits and two-unit projects; and
WHEREAS, SB 9 allows local agencies to adopt objective design, development, and subdivision standards for urban lot splits and two-unit projects; and
WHEREAS, SB 9 took effect January 1, 2022, and preempts any conflicting city ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend its local regulatory scheme to comply with Government Code sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 and to appropriately regulate projects under SB 9; and
WHEREAS, Section 9.196.040 of the Zoning Code and California Government Code section 65854 require the Planning Commission and the City Council to conduct public hearings on Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission’s action on proposed Zoning Code amendments shall be forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation; and
Item: 9
90 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development prepared an exhibit of the proposed ordinance, including the proposed language and terminology, and any additional information and documents deemed necessary for the Planning Commission to take action; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2022, the City gave public notice of a Planning Commission public hearing to be held to consider the draft ordinance by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development made the exhibit available for public inspection in the Community Development Department offices and supplied it at cost to all persons desiring a copy, at least ten (10) days prior to the scheduled Planning Commission public hearing date in accordance with Section 9.196.020 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 3, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to the Lake Forest Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to forward the proposed ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing to be held to consider the draft ordinance by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation and posted the public notice at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, the City Clerk made the ordinance and all relevant documents available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office, at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled City Council public hearing date in accordance with Section 9.196.020 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City Council considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony regarding amendments to the Municipal Code.

Item: 9
91 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Forest does ordain as follows:

Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. Under California Government Code sections 65852.21, subdivision (j), and 66411.7, subdivision (n), the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Government Code sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 and regulating urban lot splits and two-unit projects is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

Therefore, the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA in that the proposed ordinance implements these new laws enacted by SB 9.

Section 3. Chapters 7.50 and 9.52 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code are hereby amended and restated as provided in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 4. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this resolution are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 5. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute, and file with the Orange County Clerk Recorder a notice of exemption within five (5) working days of the adoption of this Ordinance.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a Certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

Item: 9
92 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of March, 2022.

ROBERT PEQUEÑO
MAYOR
ATTEST:

LISA BERGLUND, MPA

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 1 st day of February 2022, and thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 1st day of March, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND, MPA
Item: 9
93 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 CITY CLERK
Item: 9
94 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 EXHIBIT A
Amendments to Municipal Code
(follows this page)
Item: 9
95 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 Chapter 7.50 is hereby added to Title 7 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code, to read in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 7.50 State-mandated Subdivisions
Section 7.50.010 Urban Lot Splits
(a)Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow and appropriately regulate urban lot splits in accordance with Government Code section 66411.7. (b)Definition. An “urban lot split” means the subdivision of an existing, legally subdivided lot into two lots in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(c)Application.
(1) Owners.
(A) Only individual property owners may apply for an urban lot split. “Individual property owner” means a natural person holding fee title individually or jointly in the person’s own name or a beneficiary of a trust that holds fee title. “Individual property owner” does not include any corporation or corporate person of any kind (partnership, LP, LLC, C corp, S corp, etc.) except for a community land trust (as defined by Rev. & Tax Code § 402.1(a)(11)(C)(ii)) or a qualified nonprofit corporation (as defined by § 214.15).
(B) Any person or entity with a mortgage interest in the lot to be split under this section must sign the application and the parcel map affirming the person’s consent to the project. (2) An application for an urban lot split must be submitted on the City’s approved form. Only a complete application will be processed. The City will inform the applicant in writing of any incompleteness within 30 days after the application is submitted.
(3) The City may establish a fee or deposit to recover its costs for adopting, implementing, and enforcing this section of the Code, in accordance with applicable law. The City Council may establish and Item: 9
96 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 change the fee or deposit by resolution. The fee or deposit must be paid concurrently with the application submittal.
(d)Approval.
(1) An application for a parcel map for an urban lot split is approved or denied ministerially, by the Director of Community Development, without discretionary review.
(2) A tentative parcel map for an urban lot split is approved ministerially if it complies with all the requirements of this section. The tentative parcel map may not be recorded. A final parcel map is approved ministerially as well, but not until the owner demonstrates that the required documents, such as the deed restriction and easements, have been recorded.
(3) The approval must require the owner and applicant to hold the City harmless from all claims and damages related to the approval and its subject matter.
(4) The approval must require the owner and applicant to reimburse the City for all costs of enforcement, including attorneys’ fees and costs associated with enforcing the requirements of this Code. (e)Requirements. An urban lot split must comply with each of the following requirements:
(1)Map Act Compliance.
(A) The urban lot split must conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66410 et. seq., “SMA”) and implementing requirements in this Code, except as otherwise expressly provided in this section. (B) If an urban lot split violates any part of the SMA, the City’s subdivision regulations, including this section, or any other legal requirement:
(i) The buyer or grantee of a lot that is created by the urban lot split has all the remedies available under the Item: 9
97 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 SMA, including but not limited to an action for damages or to void the deed, sale, or contract.
(ii) The City has all the remedies available to it under the SMA, including but not limited to the following:
(I) An action to enjoin any attempt to sell, lease, or
finance the property.
(II) An action for other legal, equitable, or summary
remedy, such as declaratory and injunctive relief.
(III) Criminal prosecution, punishable by imprisonment
in county jail or state prison for up to one year, by
a fine of up to $10,000, or both; or a
misdemeanor.
(IV) Record a notice of violation.
(V) Withhold any or all future permits and approvals.
(C) Notwithstanding section 66411.1 of the SMA, no dedication of rights-of-way or construction of offsite improvements is required for an urban lot split.
(2)Zone. The lot to be split is in a single-family residential zone. For purposes of this section, a single-family residential zone is a zone where the only residential use that is allowed as a primary use is a single residential dwelling on a lot.
(3)Lot Location.
(A) The lot to be split is not located on a site that is any of the following:
(i) Prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, or land that is zoned or designated for agricultural
protection or preservation by the voters.
(ii) A wetland.

Item: 9
98 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (iii) Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, unless the site complies with all fire-hazard mitigation measures
required by existing building standards.
(iv) A hazardous waste site that has not been cleared for residential use.
(v) Within a delineated earthquake fault zone, unless all development on the site complies with applicable
seismic protection building code standards.
(vi) Within a 100-year flood hazard area, unless the site has either:
(I) been subject to a Letter of Map Revision
prepared by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction, or
(II) meets Federal Emergency Management Agency
requirements necessary to meet minimum flood
plain management criteria of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
(vii) Within a regulatory floodway, unless all development on the site has received a no-rise certification.
(viii) Land identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan, habitat conservation plan, or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(ix) Habitat for protected species.
(x) Land under conservation easement.
(B) The purpose of subpart (e)(3)(A) above is merely to summarize the requirements of Government Code section
65913.4(a)(6)(B)–(K). (See Gov. Code § 66411.7(a)(3)(C).) (C) The applicant must provide evidence that the requirements of Government Code section 65913.4(a)(6)(B)–(K) are satisfied.

Item: 9
99 55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (4)Not Historic. The lot to be split must not be a historic property or within a historic district that is included on the State Historic Resources Inventory. Nor may the lot be or be within a site that is designated by ordinance as a city or county landmark or as a historic property or district.
(5)No Prior Urban Lot Split.
(A) The lot to be split was not established through a prior urban lot split.
(B) The lot to be split is not adjacent to any lot that was established through a prior urban lot split by the owner of the lot to be split or by any person acting in concert with the owner.
(6)No Impact on Protected Housing.
(A) The urban lot split must not require or include the demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is income-restricted for households of moderate, low, or very low income.
(ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(iii) Housing, or a lot that used to have housing, that has been withdrawn from rental or lease under the Ellis Act (Gov. Code §§ 7060–7060.7) at any time in the 15
years prior to submission of the urban lot split
application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years prior to submission of the urban lot split
application.
(B) As part of the urban lot split application, the applicant and the owner of a property must provide a sworn statement by
Item: 9
100
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 affidavit representing and warranting that subpart (e)(6)(A) above is satisfied.
(i) The sworn statement must state that:
(I) No housing that is income-restricted for
households of moderate, low, or very low income
will be demolished or altered.
(II) No housing that is subject to any form of rent or
price control will be demolished or altered.
(III) No housing that has been withdrawn from rental
or lease under the Ellis Act at any time in the 15
years preceding the urban lot split application will
be demolished or altered.
(IV) No housing that has been occupied by a tenant in
the three years preceding the urban lot split
application will be demolished or altered.
(ii) The City may conduct its own inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of the sworn statement,
including but not limited to, surveying owners of nearby properties; and the City may require additional evidence of the applicant and owner as necessary to determine
compliance with this requirement.
(7)Lot Size.
(A) The lot to be split must be at least 2,400 square feet. (B) The resulting lots must each be at least 1,200 square feet. (C) Each of the resulting lots must be between 60 percent and 40 percent of the original lot area.
(8)Easements.
(A) The owner must enter into an easement agreement with each public-service provider to establish easements that are Item: 9
101
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 sufficient for the provision of public services and facilities to each of the resulting lots.
(B) Each easement must be shown on the tentative parcel map. (C) Copies of the unrecorded easement agreements must be submitted with the urban lot split application. The easement agreements must be recorded before the final map may be approved, in accordance with subpart (d)(2) above.
(D) If an easement is recorded and the subdivision is not approved or otherwise completed, making the easement moot, the property owner may request, and the City will provide, a notice of termination of the easement, which the owner may record.
(9)Lot Access. Each resulting lot must adjoin a public street right-of- way with frontage of at least 12.5 feet.
(10)Unit Standards.
(A)Quantity. No more than two dwelling units of any kind may be built on a lot that results from an urban lot split. For purposes of this paragraph, “unit” means any dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, a primary dwelling unit, a unit created under section 9.52.010 of this code, an ADU, or a JADU
(B)Unit Size.
(i) The total floor area of each primary dwelling that is developed on a resulting lot must be:
(I) less than or equal to 800 square feet and
(II) more than 500 square feet.
(ii) A primary dwelling that was legally established prior to the urban lot split and that is larger than 800 square feet is limited to the lawful floor area at the time of the urban lot split. It may not be expanded.

Item: 9
102
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (iii) A primary dwelling that was legally established prior to the urban lot split and that is smaller than 800 square feet may be expanded to 800 square feet after the
urban lot split.
(C)Height Restrictions.
(i) On a resulting lot that is larger than 2,000 square feet, no new primary dwelling unit may exceed a single story
or 16 feet in height, measured from grade to peak of the structure.
(ii) On a resulting lot that is smaller than 2,000 square feet, no new primary dwelling unit may exceed two stories or
22 feet in height, measured from grade to peak of the
structure. Any portion of a new primary dwelling that
exceeds one story must be stepped back a minimum of
five feet from the ground floor facade; no balcony, deck or other portion of the second story may project into the stepback.
(iii) No rooftop deck is permitted on any new or remodeled dwelling or structure on a lot resulting from an urban lot split.
(D)Setbacks.
(i)Generally. All setbacks must conform to those objective setbacks applicable in the corresponding zone.
(ii)Exceptions. Notwithstanding subpart (e)(10)(D)(i)
above:
(I)Existing Structures. No setback is required for
an existing legally established structure or for a
new structure that is constructed in the same
location and to the same dimensions as an
existing legally established structure.

Item: 9
103
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (II)800 Sq. Ft.; Four-Foot Side and Rear. The
setbacks applicable in the corresponding zone
must yield to the degree necessary to avoid
physically precluding the construction of up to two
units on the lot or either of the two units from
being at least 800 square feet in floor area; but in
no event may any structure be less than four feet
from a side or rear property line.
(iii)Front Setback Area. Notwithstanding any other part of this Code, dwellings that are constructed after an urban lot split must be at least 20 feet from the front property line(s). The front setback areas must:
(I) be kept free of all structures greater than three
feet tall;
(II) be at least 50 percent landscaped, with
vegetation and irrigation plans prepared by a
licensed landscape architect and approved by the
Director;
(III) allow for fire-safety access to all structures and vehicular access, a minimum of ten feet wide, to
each provided parking space, including garages
and carports.
(E)Parking. Each new primary dwelling unit that is built on a lot after an urban lot split must have at least one off-street parking space per unit unless one of the following applies:
(i) The lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of either:
(I) a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak
commute hours or
(II) a site that contains
Item: 9
104
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (ia) an existing rail or bus rapid transit station,
(ib) a ferry terminal served by either a bus or
rail transit service, or
(ic) the intersection of two or more major bus
routes with a frequency of service interval
of 15 minutes or less during the morning
and afternoon peak commute periods.
(ii) The site is located within one block of a car-share vehicle location.
(F)Architecture.
(i) If there is a legal primary dwelling on the lot that was established before the urban lot split, any new primary dwelling unit must match the existing primary dwelling
unit in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch.

The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the
largest portion of the roof.
(ii) If there is no legal primary dwelling on the lot before the urban lot split, and if two primary dwellings are
developed on the lot, the dwellings must match each
other in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof
pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by
the largest portion of the roof.
(iii) All exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights. (iv) No window or door of a dwelling that is constructed on the lot after the urban lot split may have a direct line of sight to a window or door of a structure on or to the rear or side yard of adjoining residential property. Fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide
screening and prevent a direct line of sight.
(v) If a two-story dwelling is constructed on a lot after an urban lot split and any portion of the dwelling is less Item: 9
105
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 than 25 feet from a property line that is not a public right-of-way line, then all second-story windows and
doors in that portion must either be (for windows)
clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass.
(G)Landscaping.
(i) Tree Removal.
(I) No mature tree may be removed on a lot with any
development under this chapter unless removal is
necessary to constructing a dwelling unit that
must be allowed under state law.
(II) “Mature tree” means a tree with a diameter of six
inches or more or a height of eight feet or taller.
(III) A tree may only be removed under subparagraph
(e)(10)(G)(i)(I) above if it is replaced with at least
two mature trees of the same type and with a
trunk diameter that is the same or larger than that
of the removed tree.
(ii) Evergreen landscape screening must be planted and
maintained between each dwelling and adjacent lots
(but not rights of way) as follows:
(I) At least one 15-gallon size plant shall be provided for every five linear feet of exterior building wall.

Item: 9
106
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (H)Nonconforming Conditions. An urban lot split is approved without requiring a legal nonconforming zoning condition to be corrected.
(I)Utilities.
(i) Each primary dwelling unit on a resulting lot must have its own direct utility connection to the utility service provider.
(ii) All utilities must be underground.
(11)Fire-Hazard Mitigation Measures.
(A) A lot in a very high fire hazard severity zone must comply with each of the following fire-hazard mitigation measures:
(i) In areas that have only a single egress point, no more than 149 dwellings of any type (primary or accessory)
may be developed. A secondary egress point for fire
and life safety access must be approved and provided
before more than 149 dwellings may be developed.
(ii) The lot must have direct access to a public street right- of-way with a paved street with a width of at least 40
feet.
(iii) All dwellings on the site must comply with current fire code requirements for dwellings in a very high fire
hazard severity zone.
(iv) All enclosed structures on the site must have fire sprinklers.
(v) All sides of all dwellings on the site must be within a 150-foot hose-pull distance from either the public street right-of-way or of an onsite fire hydrant or standpipe. (B) Prior to submitting an application for an urban lot split, the applicant must obtain a certificate of compliance with all applicable fire-hazard mitigation measures in accordance with Item: 9
107
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 this subpart (e)(11). The City or its authorized agent must inspect the site, including all structures on the site, and certify as to its compliance. The certificate must be included with the application. The applicant must pay the City’s costs for inspection. Failure to pay is grounds for denying the
application.
(12)Separate Conveyance.
(A) Within a resulting lot.
(i) Primary dwelling units may not be owned or conveyed separately from each other.
(ii) Condominium airspace subdivisions and common
interest developments are not permitted.
(iii) All fee interest in a lot and all dwellings on the lot must be held equally and undivided by all individual property owners.
(iv) No timeshare, as defined by state law or this code, is permitted. This includes any co-ownership arrangement
that gives an owner the right to exclusive use of the
property for a defined period or periods of time.
(B) Between resulting lots. Separate conveyance of the resulting lots is permitted. If dwellings or other structures (such as garages) on different lots are adjacent or attached to each other, the urban lot split boundary may separate them for conveyance purposes if the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate
conveyance. If any attached structures span or will span the new lot line, the owner must record appropriate CC&Rs,
easements, or other documentation that is necessary to
allocate rights and responsibility between the owners of the two lots.

Item: 9
108
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (13)Regulation of Uses.
(A)Residential-only. No non-residential use, including a home occupation, is permitted on any lot created by urban lot split. (B)No Short-Term Rentals. No dwelling unit on a lot that is created by an urban lot split may be rented for a period of less than 30 days.
(C)Owner Occupancy. The applicant for an urban lot split must sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the dwelling units on one of the resulting lots as the applicant's principal residence for a minimum of three years after the urban lot split is approved.
(14)Notice of Construction.
(A) At least 30 business days before starting any construction of a structure on a lot created by an urban lot split, the property owner must give written notice to all the owners of record of each of the adjacent residential parcels, which notice must include the following information:
(i) Notice that construction has been authorized,
(ii) The anticipated start and end dates for construction, (iii) The hours of construction,
(iv) Contact information for the project manager (for
construction-related complaints), and
(v) Contact information for the Building Division.
(B) This notice requirement does not confer a right on the noticed persons or on anyone else to comment on the project before permits are issued. Approval of an urban lot split is ministerial.

Under state law, the City has no discretion in approving or denying a particular project under this section. This notice requirement is purely to promote neighborhood awareness and expectation.

Item: 9
109
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (15)Deed Restriction. The owner must record a deed restriction on each lot that results from the urban lot split, on a form approved by the city, that does each of the following:
(A) Expressly prohibits any rental of any dwelling on the property for a period of less than 30 days.
(B) Expressly prohibits any non-residential use of the lots created by the urban lot split, including home occupations.
(C) Expressly prohibits any separate conveyance of a primary dwelling on the property, any separate fee interest, and any common interest development within the lot.
(D) States that:
(i) The lot is formed by an urban lot split and is therefore subject to the City’s urban lot-split regulations, including all applicable limits on dwelling size and development. (ii) Development on the lot is limited to development of residential units under section 9.52.010 of this Code,
except as required by state law.
(f)Specific Adverse Impacts.
(1) Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the City may deny an application for an urban lot split if the Building Official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the project would have a “specific, adverse impact” on either public health and safety or on the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.
(2) “Specific adverse impact” has the same meaning as in Gov. Code § 65589.5(d)(2): “a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete” and does not include (1) inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use Item: 9
110
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 designation or (2) the eligibility to claim a welfare exemption under Revenue and Taxation Code section 214(g).
(3) The Building Official may consult with and be assisted by planning staff and others as necessary in making a finding of specific, adverse impact.

Item: 9
111
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 Chapter 9.52, in Title 9, of the Lake Forest Municipal Code, is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 9.52 State-mandated Residential
Section 9.52.010 Two-unit Projects
(a)Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow and appropriately regulate two-unit projects in accordance with Government Code section 65852.21. (b)Definition. A “two-unit project” means the development of two primary dwelling units or, if there is already a primary dwelling unit on the lot, the development of a second primary dwelling unit on a legally subdivided lot in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(c)Application.
(1) Owners.
(A) Only individual property owners may apply for a two-unit project. “Individual property owner” means a natural person holding fee title individually or jointly in the person’s own name or a beneficiary of a trust that holds fee title. “Individual property owner” does not include any corporation or corporate person of any kind (partnership, LP, LLC, C corp, S corp, etc.) except for a community land trust (as defined by Rev. & Tax Code § 402.1(a)(11)(C)(ii)) or a qualified nonprofit corporation (as defined by Rev. & Tax Code § 214.15).
(B) Any person with a mortgage interest in the lot must sign the application and the parcel map indicating the person’s consent to the project.
(2) An application for a two-unit project must be submitted on the City’s approved form.
(3) The applicant must obtain a certificate of compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the implementing regulations in this Code for the lot and provide the certificate with the application.

Item: 9
112
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (4) Only a complete application will be considered. The City will inform the applicant in writing of any incompleteness within 30 days after the application is submitted.
(5) The City may establish a deposit or fee to recover its costs for adopting, implementing, and enforcing this section of the Code, in accordance with applicable law. The City Council may establish and change the deposit or fee by resolution. The fee must be paid concurrently with the application submittal.
(d)Approval.
(1) An application for a two-unit project is approved or denied ministerially, by the Director of Community Development, without discretionary review.
(2) The ministerial approval of a two-unit project does not take effect until the City has confirmed that the required documents, such as the deed restriction and easements, have been recorded.
(3) The approval must require the owner and applicant to hold the City harmless from all claims and damages related to the approval and its subject matter.
(4) The approval must require the owner and applicant to reimburse the City for all costs of enforcement, including attorneys’ fees and costs associated with enforcing the requirements of this code. (e)Requirements. A two-unit project must satisfy each of the following requirements:
(1)Map Act Compliance. The lot must have been created by a legal subdivision.
(2)Zone. The lot is in a single-family residential zone. For purposes of this section, a single-family residential zone is a zone where the only residential use that is allowed as a primary use is a single residential dwelling on a lot.

Item: 9
113
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (3)Lot Location.
(A) The lot is not located on a site that is any of the following:
(i) Prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, or land that is zoned or designated for agricultural
protection or preservation by the voters.
(ii) A wetland.
(iii) Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, unless the site complies with all fire-hazard mitigation measures
required by existing building standards.
(iv) A hazardous waste site that has not been cleared for residential use.
(v) Within a delineated earthquake fault zone, unless all development on the site complies with applicable
seismic protection building code standards.
(vi) Within a 100-year flood hazard area, unless the site has either:
(I) been subject to a Letter of Map Revision
prepared by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction, or
(II) meets Federal Emergency Management Agency
requirements necessary to meet minimum flood
plain management criteria of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
(vii) Within a regulatory floodway, unless all development on the site has received a no-rise certification.
(viii) Land identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan, habitat conservation plan, or other adopted natural resource protection plan.
(ix) Habitat for protected species.

Item: 9
114
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (x) Land under conservation easement.
(B) The purpose of subpart (e)(3)(A) above is merely to summarize the requirements of Government Code section
65913.4(a)(6)(B)–(K). (See Gov. Code § 66411.7(a)(3)(C).) (C) The applicant must provide evidence that the requirements of Government Code section 65913.4(a)(6)(B)–(K) are satisfied. (4)Not Historic. The lot must not be a historic property or within a historic district that is included on the State Historic Resources Inventory. Nor may the lot be or be within a site that is designated by ordinance as a city or county landmark or as a historic property or district.
(5)No Impact on Protected Housing.
(A) The two-unit project must not require or include the demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is income-restricted for households of moderate, low, or very low income.
(ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
(iii) Housing, or a lot that used to have housing, that has been withdrawn from rental or lease under the Ellis Act (Gov. Code §§ 7060–7060.7) at any time in the 15
years prior to submission of the two-unit project
application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the three years preceding the two-unit project application.
(B) As part of the two-unit project application, the applicant and the owner of a property must provide a sworn statement by affidavit representing and warranting that subpart (e)(5)(A) above is satisfied.

Item: 9
115
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (i) The sworn statement must state that:
(I) No housing that is income-restricted for
households of moderate, low, or very low income
will be demolished or altered.
(II) No housing that is subject to any form of rent or
price control will be demolished or altered.
(III) No housing that has been withdrawn from rental
or lease under the Ellis Act at any time in the 15
years preceding the two-unit project application
will be demolished or altered.
(IV) No housing that has been occupied by a tenant in
the three years preceding the two-unit project
application will be demolished or altered.
(ii) The City may conduct its own inquiries and investigation to ascertain the veracity of the sworn statement,
including but not limited to, surveying owners of nearby properties; and the City may require additional evidence of the applicant and owner as necessary to determine
compliance with this requirement.
(6)Unit Standards.
(A)Quantity.
(i) A lot that results from an urban lot split, under section

7.50.010, may have no more than two dwelling units of
any kind. See section 7.50.010, subsection (e)(10)(A).
(ii) A lot that is not created by an urban lot split may have a two-unit project under this section, plus any ADU or
JADU that must be allowed under state law and the
City’s ADU ordinance.

Item: 9
116
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (B)Unit Size.
(i) The total floor area of each primary dwelling built that is developed under this section must be
(I) less than or equal to 800 square feet and
(II) more than 500 square feet.
(ii) A primary dwelling that was legally established on the lot prior to the two-unit project and that is larger than 800 square feet is limited to the lawful floor area existing at the time that the application for the two-unit project is submitted. The unit may not be expanded.
(iii) A primary dwelling that was legally established prior to the two-unit project and that is smaller than 800 square feet may be expanded to 800 square feet after or as
part of the two-unit project.
(C)Height Restrictions.
(i) On a lot that is larger than 2,000 square feet, no new primary dwelling unit may exceed a single story or 16
feet in height, measured from grade to peak of the
structure.
(ii) On a lot that is smaller than 2,000 square feet, no new primary dwelling unit may exceed two stories or 22 feet in height, measured from grade to peak of the structure.

Any portion of a new primary dwelling that exceeds one
story must be stepped back by a minimum of five feet
from the ground floor facade; no balcony, deck, or other portion of the second story may project into the
stepback.
(iii) No rooftop deck is permitted on any new or remodeled dwelling or structure on a lot with a two-unit project.

Item: 9
117
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (D)Demolition Limit. The two-unit project may not involve the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior walls of an existing dwelling unless the site has not been occupied by a tenant in the three years preceding application for the two-unit project.
(E)Setbacks.
(i)Generally. All setbacks must conform to those objective setbacks applicable in the corresponding zone.
(ii)Exceptions. Notwithstanding subpart (e)(6)(E) above:
(I)Existing Structures. No setback is required for
an existing legally established structure or for a
new structure that is constructed in the same
location and to the same dimensions as an
existing legally established structure.
(II)800 Sq. Ft.; Four-Foot Side and Rear. The
setbacks applicable in the corresponding zone
must yield to the degree necessary to avoid
physically precluding the construction of up to two
units on the lot or either of the two units from
being at least 800 square feet in floor area; but in
no event may any structure be less than four feet
from a side or rear property line.
(iii)Front Setback Area. Notwithstanding any other part of this code, dwellings that are constructed under this
section must be at least 20 feet from the front property line(s). The front setback area must:
(I) be kept free of all structures greater than three
feet high;
(II) be at least 50 percent landscaped, with
vegetation and irrigation plans prepared by a
licensed landscape architect and approved by the
Director;
Item: 9
118
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (III) allow for fire-safety access to all structures and vehicular access, a minimum of ten feet wide, to
each provided parking space, including garages
and carports.
(F)Parking. Each new primary dwelling unit must have at least one off-street parking space per unit unless one of the following applies:
(i) The lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of either:
(I) a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak
commute hours or
(II) a site that contains
(ia) an existing rail or bus rapid transit station,
(ib) a ferry terminal served by either a bus or
rail transit service, or
(ic) the intersection of two or more major bus
routes with a frequency of service interval
of 15 minutes or less during the morning
and afternoon peak commute periods.
(ii) The site is located within one block of a car-share vehicle location.
(G)Architecture.
(i) If there is a legal primary dwelling on the lot that was established before the two-unit project, any new primary dwelling unit must match the existing primary dwelling
unit in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch.

The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the
largest portion of the roof.

Item: 9
119
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (ii) If there is no legal primary dwelling on the lot before the two-unit project, and if two primary dwellings are
developed on the lot, the dwellings must match each
other in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof
pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by
the largest portion of the roof.
(iii) All exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights. (iv) No window or door of a dwelling that is constructed on the lot under this section may have a direct line of sight to a window or door of a structure on or to the rear or side yard of adjoining residential property. Fencing,
landscaping, or privacy glass may be used to provide
screening and prevent a direct line of sight.
(v) If any portion of a dwelling is less than 25 feet from a property line that is not a public right-of-way line, then all windows and doors in that portion must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass.
(H)Landscaping.
(i) Tree Removal.
(I) No mature tree may be removed on a lot with any
development under this section unless removal is
necessary to constructing a dwelling unit that
must be allowed under state law.
(II) “Mature tree” means a tree with a diameter of six
inches or more or a height of eight feet or taller.
(III) A tree may only be removed under subparagraph
(e)(6)(H)(i)(I) above if it is replaced with at least
two mature trees of the same type and with a
trunk diameter that is the same or larger than that
of the removed tree.

Item: 9
120
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (ii) Evergreen landscape screening must be planted and maintained between each dwelling and adjacent lots
(but not rights of way) as follows:
(I) At least one 15-gallon size plant shall be provided for every five linear feet of exterior building wall.

Alternatively, at least one 24-inch box size plant
shall be provided for every ten linear feet of
exterior wall.
(II) Plant specimens must be at least six feet tall
when installed. As an alternative to the planting
required by paragraph (e)(6)(H)(ii)(II) above, a
solid fence of at least 6 feet in height may be
installed.
(I)Nonconforming Conditions. A two-unit project may only be approved if all nonconforming zoning conditions are corrected. (J)Utilities.
(i) Each primary dwelling unit on the lot must have its own direct utility connection to the utility service provider. (ii) All utilities must be underground.
(K)Building & Safety. All structures built on the lot must comply with all current local building standards. A project under this section is a change of use and subjects the whole of the lot, and all structures, to the City’s current code.
(7)Fire-Hazard Mitigation Measures.
(A) A lot in a very high fire hazard severity zone must comply with each of the following fire-hazard mitigation measures:
(i) In areas that have only a single egress point, no more than 149 dwellings of any type (primary or accessory)
may be developed. A secondary egress point for fire
and life safety access must be approved and provided
before more than 149 dwellings may be developed.

Item: 9
121
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (ii) The lot must have direct access to a public right of way with a paved street with a width of at least 40 feet.
(iii) All dwellings on the site must comply with current fire code requirements for dwellings in a very high fire
hazard severity zone.
(iv) All enclosed structures on the site must have fire sprinklers.
(v) All sides of all dwellings on the site must be within a 150-foot hose-pull distance from either the public street right-of-way or of an onsite fire hydrant or standpipe. (B) Prior to submitting an application for a two-unit project, the applicant must obtain a certificate of compliance with all applicable fire-hazard mitigation measures in accordance with this subpart (e)(7). The City or its authorized agent must inspect the site, including all structures on the site, and certify as to its compliance. The certificate must be included with the application. The applicant must pay the City’s costs for inspection. Failure to pay is grounds for denying the
application.
(8)Separate Conveyance.
(A) Primary dwelling units on the lot may not be owned or conveyed separately from each other.
(B) Condominium airspace subdivisions and common interest developments are not permitted within the lot.
(C) All fee interest in the lot and all the dwellings must be held equally and undivided by all individual property owners. (i) No timeshare, as defined by state law or this Code, is permitted. This includes any co-ownership arrangement
that gives an owner the right to exclusive use of the
property for a defined period or periods of time.

Item: 9
122
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (9)Regulation of Uses.
(A)Residential-only. No non-residential use is permitted on any lot created by urban lot split. This prohibition includes home occupations.
(B)No Short-Term Rentals. No dwelling unit on the lot may be rented for a period of less than 30 days.
(C)Owner Occupancy. Unless the lot was formed by an urban lot split, the individual property owners of a lot with a two-unit project must occupy one of the dwellings on the lot as the owners’ principal residence and legal domicile.
(10)Notice of Construction.
(A) At least 30 business days before starting any construction of a two-unit project, the property owner must give written notice to all the owners of record of each of the adjacent residential parcels, which notice must include the following information:
(i) Notice that construction has been authorized,
(ii) The anticipated start and end dates for construction, (iii) The hours of construction,
(iv) Contact information for the project manager (for
construction-related complaints), and
(v) Contact information for the City Building Division. (B) This notice requirement does not confer a right on the noticed persons or on anyone else to comment on the project before permits are issued. Approval of a two-unit project is
ministerial. Under state law, the City has no discretion in approving or denying a particular project under this section.

This notice requirement is purely to promote neighborhood awareness and expectation.

Item: 9
123
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (11)Deed Restriction. The owner must record a deed restriction, on a form approved by the City, that does each of the following:
(A) Expressly prohibits any rental of any dwelling on the property for a period of less than 30 days.
(B) Expressly prohibits any non-residential use of the lot, including home occupations.
(C) Expressly prohibits any separate conveyance of a primary dwelling on the property, any separate fee interest, and any common interest development within the lot.
(D) If the lot does not undergo an urban lot split: Expressly requires the individual property owners to live in one of the dwelling units on the lot as the owners’ primary residence and legal domicile.
(E) Limits development of the lot to residential units that comply with the requirements of this section, except as required by state law.
(f)Specific Adverse Impacts.
(1) Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the City may deny an application for a two-unit project if the Building Official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the project would have a “specific, adverse impact” on either public health and safety or on the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.
(2) “Specific adverse impact” has the same meaning as in Gov. Code § 65589.5(d)(2): “a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete” and does not include (1) inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use designation or (2) the eligibility to claim a welfare exemption under Revenue and Taxation Code section 214(g).

Item: 9
124
55136.00400\34706961.1
5 0
0 9
6 (3) The Building Official may consult with and be assisted by planning staff and others as necessary in making a finding of specific, adverse impact.
(g)Remedies.

If a two-unit project violates any part of this Code or any other legal requirement:
(1) The buyer, grantee, or lessee of any part of the property has an action for damages or to void the deed, sale, or contract. (2) The City may:
(A) Bring an action to enjoin any attempt to sell, lease, or finance the property.
(B) Bring an action for other legal, equitable, or summary remedy, such as declaratory and injunctive relief.
(C) Pursue criminal prosecution, punishable by imprisonment in county jail or state prison for up to one year, by a fine of up to $10,000, or both; or a misdemeanor.
(D) Record a notice of violation.
(E) Withhold any or all future permits and approvals.
(F) Pursue all other administrative, legal, or equitable remedies that are allowed by law or the City’s Code.

Item: 9
125
ATTACHMENT 2
Item: 9
126
Item: 9
127
Item: 9
128
Item: 9
129

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT:

ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 12-21-5483, A CITY-INITIATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD CHAPTER 9.60 OF THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL

CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW

MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IN THE CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1) Find that Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
2) Introduce First Reading of an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 9.60

TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW

MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IN THE CITY AND DETERMINING THE
ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA (ZC 12-21-5483)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to add Chapter 9.60 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code to establish objective design standards for new multifamily projects in the City. The design standards will provide developers, builders, and architects with clear standards of the desired site design characteristics for new multifamily projects. The standards will be used to review projects that qualify for ministerial, by-right review under California Senate Bill 35, as well as multifamily and mixed use projects that do not meet the requirements of the ministerial review under Senate Bill 35 and are subject to discretionary review. At their February 3, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the draft ordinance to the City Council.

Staff recommends the City Council find the proposed Zoning Code Amendment is exempt from CEQA and introduce the proposed ordinance for first reading to implement aforementioned changes to the zoning code.

Item: 10
130
1 8
9 1
BACKGROUND:

To address the housing shortage, recent State legislation, including Senate Bill 35 (SB 35) and Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), requires projects to be reviewed against objective design standards. Objective design standards include a broad set of standards used by an agency to regulate development, including objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards. Objective standards are the only basis a local agency may use to deny or reduce the density of certain eligible projects. Currently, the Community Development Department reviews new development projects in accordance with the Citywide Design Guidelines, which include district specific guidelines for areas throughout the City such as the El Toro Redevelopment Project Area.

However, the Citywide Design Guidelines include various subjective design standards such as: “Articulated building facades along street frontages are encouraged” and “Building entries should be readily identifiable” and are not enforceable for projects that meet the eligibility requirements of SB 35.

The City cannot apply subjective design standards to SB 35 projects; only objective design standards may be applied. Objective design standards are those that “involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable” by an applicant and the City prior to application submittal (Gov. Code §65913.4(a)(5). Examples of objective design standards include setbacks and height requirements. Height and setback requirements are objective as compliance can be uniformly verified with a “tape” measure; subjective judgment does not enter the equation.

The proposed objective design standards would also apply to multifamily projects that do not meet the requirements of SB 35, as well as any residential portion of projects that are proposed in any of the new General Plan Mixed Use areas (MU43, MU35, MU25, UI43, UI25) in the interim period prior to the adoption of the Mixed Use Zoning regulations. In April of 2021, the City Council approved a contract with a consultant group, SWA, for the preparation of the new Mixed Use Zoning regulations. It is anticipated that the new Mixed Use Zoning regulations will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in the second quarter of 2022.

Although the City has not received any SB 35 project applications to date, staff is recommending that the City Council establish objective design standards at this time to ensure that the City has standards in place as applications are submitted.

The City’s existing Citywide Design Guidelines do not contemplate situations where state law requires the City to only impose objective standards.

Item: 10
131
1 8
9 1
At their February 3, 2022 hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the draft ordinance to the City Council. A copy of the Planning Commission staff report and resolution have been included as Attachment 2 and 3 respectively.

DISCUSSION:

In accordance with state law, the purpose of the proposed ordinance is to establish multifamily residential objective design standards that will provide developers, builders, and architects with clear standards of the desired site design characteristics for new multifamily projects in Lake Forest. The proposed ordinance is included as Attachment 1 and would add a new Chapter 9.60 to the Lake Forest Municipal Code. Collectively, these standards include provisions governing building design, site design, building massing and articulation, landscape and parking design requirements, and accessory structures. These standards are objective in nature and can be definitively verified through a plan check process. For example, the proposed ordinance includes a requirement under the building design section that blank walls (facades without doors, windows, landscaping treatments) shall be less than 30 feet in length. This standard is easily verifiable and would not involve personal or subjective judgement to determine if a project design met this requirement.

Projects that are eligible for ministerial approval under state law would not require a public hearing or Planning Commission review. If the proposed project is not eligible for ministerial approval, then it would be subject to discretionary review. All multifamily projects—regardless of whether the project qualifies for ministerial approval under SB 35—will be subject to this ordinance’s objective design standards as well as all other objective site development standards dictated by the zoning district and General Plan designation (including setbacks, density requirements, lot coverage, building height, etc.).

Table 1 below includes the different development projects that would be subject to these objective design standards and the approval process.

9.184.040
Multifamily
component of a
Mixed Use project
with a General Plan
designation of MU
43, 32, 25, or UI 43,
25 Discretionary
(Planning
Commission
approval)
Objective Design Standards,
Citywide Design Guidelines,
Discretionary findings in
accordance with LFMC

9.184.040
Once the Mixed Use Zoning regulations have been adopted, projects in the Mixed Use areas would be subject to those regulations and the objective design standards would be revised to remove this project type from the applicability section.

Adoption of the proposed ordinance (Attachment 1) will establish clear and objective standards for new multifamily projects in the City. Such standards will prepare the City for SB 35 projects and ensure continued compliance with state law, as well set design standards for other multifamily projects, including those in the Mixed Use areas. For these reasons, staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance (Attachment 1).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which provides that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Zoning Code Amendment ZC 12-21-5483 will not have a significant effect on the environment as it simply establishes objective design review standards for multifamily projects in accordance with State law; it does not authorize construction or development. As the City receives individual multifamily project applications, projects subject to discretionary review will be reviewed in accordance with CEQA; projects subject to ministerial approval under SB 35 are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code Section 21080(b)(1).

PUBLIC NOTICING:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 9.184.040(C)(2) of the Municipal Code, the hearing for this item has been noticed in the newspaper of general Item: 10
133
1 8
9 1
circulation on February 18, 2022. In addition, the public notice was posted at City Hall.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City for the adoption of the Objective Design Standards for multifamily projects. City expenditures associated with the processing of entitlements and review of projects would be reimbursed by the corresponding project applicants, in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Ordinance for ZC 12-21-5483

2. February 3, 2022 Planning Commission Report

3. Signed Planning Commission Resolution for ZC 12-21-5483 Initiated By: Amanda Lauffer, Associate Planner
Submitted By: Gayle Ackerman, AICP, Director of Community Development Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 10
134
5 0
1 8
5 Attachment 1
Item: 10
135
5 0
1 8
5 ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING

LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER

9.60 TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN

STANDARDS FOR NEW MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS

IN THE CITY AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE

EXEMPT FROM CEQA
WHEREAS, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill 35 (SB 35) which requires local governments to implement a streamlined, ministerial, review process for qualifying multifamily housing developments. The intent of the law is to address housing affordability by expediting local governmental approvals for certain new housing development projects that meet eligibility criteria; and WHEREAS, The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has determined that the City of Lake Forest is subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed development projects that include at least ten units, and at least 50% of the total units are affordable at the moderate-income level (80% AMI); and
WHEREAS, the City initiated Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 to establish objective design standards for new multifamily projects in the City. Upon adoption, such standards will be contained in the new Lake Forest Municipal Code Chapter 9.60. Additionally, these regulations would apply to the residential portion of mixed use projects in the General Plan Mixed Use areas (MU43, MU32, MU25, UI43, UI25); and
WHEREAS, In accordance with State Law (California Government Code §65913.4), the purpose of the new Chapter 9.60 is to establish multifamily residential objective design standards which, collectively, are intended to provide developers, builders, and architects with a clear standard of the desired site design characteristics for new multifamily residential development in Lake Forest; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2022, the City gave public notice in a newspaper of general circulation of the February 3, 2022 public hearing before the Planning Commission regarding Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly- noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 and Item: 10
136
5 0
1 8
5 adopted a resolution recommending the City Council adopt Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483; and
WHEREAS, on February 18, 2022, the City gave public notice in a newspaper of general circulation of the March 1, 2022 public hearing before the City Council regarding Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2022, the City Council held noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483; and
WHEREAS, all legal perquisites to the adoption of Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct and each incorporated and adopted as findings by the City Council.

SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that Zoning Code Amendment ZC 12-21-5483 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which provides that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Zoning Code Amendment ZC 12-21-5483 will not have a significant effect on the environment as it simply establishes objective design review standards for multifamily projects in accordance with State law; it does not authorize construction or development.

Therefore, the City Council finds that this ordinance is exempt from CEQA. As the City receives individual multifamily project applications, projects subject to discretionary review will be reviewed in accordance with CEQA and projects subject to ministerial approval under SB 35 will be exempt from CEQA (pursuant to Government Code Section 21080(b)(1)).

SECTION 3. General Plan Consistency. Based on the entire record before the City Council, and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council hereby finds that Zoning Code Amendment ZC 12-21-5483 is consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan. Specifically, General Plan Policy ED-2.1: Review, and streamline as appropriate, City regulations, processes, and procedures that impact business development and operations; and Land Use Action LU-2c:

Item: 10
137
5 0
1 8
5 Periodically review and amend (as needed) the Zoning Ordinance, City Subdivision Regulations, and Grading Regulations to provide consistency with new state legislation and court decisions. Review and amend Zoning Ordinance to clarify permitted and conditionally permitted uses in all districts. This Zoning Code Amendment furthers these goals, policies, and actions by updating the City's regulations to achieve consistency with federal and state law and making certain refinements to ensure that the Zoning Code is consistent and clear and provides for streamlined approval processes through Multifamily Residential Objective Design Standards which are intended to provide developers, builders, and architects with a clear standard of the desired site design characteristics for new multifamily residential development in Lake Forest. Therefore, the Zoning Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan.

SECTION 4. Code Amendment. Chapter 9.60 is hereby added to Title 9 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code, to read in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 9.60 Multifamily Residential Objective Design Standards Section 9.60.010 Purpose
A.Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish Multifamily Residential Objective Design Standards that are intended to provide developers, builders, and architects with a clear standard of the desired site design characteristics for new multifamily residential development in Lake Forest.

B.Applicability and Review; Relationship to Other Regulations.

1. All Multifamily Projects. The provisions of this chapter apply to all multifamily residential projects. Applicants must pay the project deposit in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by the City Council and provide applicable project documents for the required entitlement or streamlined review.

2. Ministerial Approval. Projects that qualify for ministerial approval under state law must comply with this chapter and all objective site and development standards set forth in Title 9 of this Code. If there is any conflict between a standard in this chapter and any other standard in Title 9, the provisions of this chapter govern. Applicants must submit evidence that the project qualifies for ministerial or otherwise streamlined approval under state law.

3. Discretionary Approval. All multifamily projects that do not qualify for ministerial approval are subject to discretionary design review and findings as set forth in Chapter 9.184 of this code. Such projects must comply with the standards set forth in this chapter, all discretionary design review Item: 10
138
5 0
1 8
5 requirements, and all site development standards and any other design guidelines that apply.

4. Mixed-Use. This chapter applies to the residential portion of mixed-use projects in the General Plan Mixed Use areas (MU43, MU32, MU25, UI43, UI25). Each mixed-use project requires a site development permit under Chapter 9.184 of this code.

Section 9.60.020 Objective Design Standards
A. Site Design and Parking

1. Primary building entrances (individual or shared) shall include at least two of the following building materials: stucco, brick, stone, or wood. Entrances that do not face a public street and sidewalk (such as within deep or large lots) shall face an internal pedestrian path that connects to a public sidewalk.

2. At least two different building types shall be included in projects with multiple buildings. Building types shall be differentiated through variations to building materials, color, rooflines, and the use of architectural features such as awnings and light fixtures.

3. Lighting shall be recessed or hooded and downward directed.

4. All surface level parking areas, covered and uncovered, shall be screened from public streets. Screening shall be accomplished through building placement, landscaping, a planted berm, decorative fencing with vines, topography, or some combination of the above. Landscaping used for screening purposes must be no less than 2 feet wide (from the back of the sidewalk or street curb to the parking lot paving, whichever is greater) and no less than 42 inches in height.

5. Structured parking shall be designed such that all lighting is fully shielded and automobile headlamps within the structure are not visible from adjacent buildings, parcels, or streets. The minimum height of screening for automobile headlights shall be 42 inches in height.

6.Parking areas shall be separated from any building by a sidewalk or landscaping with a minimum width of 5 feet.

B. Building Design

1. Blank walls (facades without doors, windows, landscaping treatments) shall be less than 30 feet in length.

2. Buildings three stories and over must provide three distinctive materials, each a minimum of 10% of the total street-facing building façade, and a minimum of two different building colors. Distinctive building materials shall include a combination of stucco, brick, stone, and wood.

Item: 10
139
5 0
1 8
5 3. Trim surrounds or recessed windows with a minimum depth of three inches shall be provided at all exterior windows and door openings.

4. Exterior front doors shall be recessed a minimum of 3 feet or have a covered porch with a minimum depth of 6 feet.

5. Exterior walls shall include one or more of the following: windows, trellises, arcades, roof overhangs, recessed or projected massing, columns, balconies, wainscots, or awnings.

6. Exterior stairwells shall not be directly visible from the street. For safety and security, exterior stairwells shall be oriented to interior spaces, such as plazas and gathering areas, parking areas, and pedestrian pathways and shall not be separated from these areas by landscaping, fences, or walls taller than three feet.

C. Massing and Articulation

1. All building walls shall have at least one minor massing break every 50 lineal feet. A “minor massing break” means a variation in setback or a building entry, recess, or structural bay or other projection. A minor massing break that is a setback, recess, or projection must be at least 12 inches deep and 4 feet wide.

2. Buildings over three stories tall shall have at least one major massing break every 100 lineal feet along all street frontages, adjacent public park, publicly accessible outdoor space, or open space area. A “major massing break” means a variation in setback or a building entry that is at least 30 inches deep and 4 wide and that extends the full height of the building.

3. Rooflines, whether pitched or flat, shall be vertically articulated at least every 50 feet along the street frontage. “Vertically articulated” means one or more of the following: a parapet, a variation in cornice, a reveal, a clerestory window or windows, or a variation in roof height or form.

D. Landscaping

1. Boundary landscaping is required for a minimum width equal to the required setback distance or 10 feet, whichever is less, along all property lines abutting streets except for required street openings.

2. Boundary landscaping shall include a combination of groundcover, shrubs, and trees.

E. Accessory Structures

1. Trash enclosures shall be constructed with the same exterior finish, materials, and colors as those of the associated main building. Climbing vines shall be installed along any trash enclosure side that is directly visible to a public street to further screen the enclosure.

Item: 10
140
5 0
1 8
5 2. Above-ground utilities, such as fire sprinkler risers, transformers, control boxes, meters, and valves shall be placed within the building, or at the side of the building and painted to match the building, or screened by landscaping on three sides.
i. Exposed piping or wires shall not be attached to the building exterior. Any piping or wires attached to the building exterior must be enclosed and finished to match the exterior building. ii. Equipment and utility enclosures shall match the building exterior color, finish, and materials.
iii. Rooftop-mounted equipment shall be screened from public view either in an enclosure or behind a pitched roof or parapet wall. “Screened from public view” means not visible from the centerline of the closest public right-of-way, 5 feet above ground elevation. A line-of-sight detail shall be provided to demonstrate adequate screening of rooftop equipment.

Section 5. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 6. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute, and file the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption within five working days of first reading of this Ordinance.

Section 7. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 8. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance and the above findings have been based are located at the City Clerk’s Office at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630. (continued on next page)
Item: 10
141
5 0
1 8
5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______, 2022.

ROBERT PEQUEÑO
MAYOR
ATTEST:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of _______ 2022, and thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ______, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND
Item: 10
142

Attachment 2
Item: 10
143
Planning Commission Agenda Report
Meeting Date: February 3, 2022
Department: Community Development
INITIATED BY: Amanda Lauffer, Associate Planner
SUBMITTED BY: Gayle Ackerman, AICP, Director of Community Development REVIEWED BY: Amy Stonich, AICP, Assistant Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 12-21-5483, A CITY-

INITIATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD
CHAPTER 9.60 OF THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL

CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS

FOR NEW MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IN THE CITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Zoning Code Amendment 12-21-5483 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to add Chapter 9.60 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code to establish objective design standards for new multifamily projects in the City. These standards will be used to review projects that qualify for ministerial, by-right review under Senate Bill 35, as well as multifamily and mixed use projects that do not meet the requirements of the ministerial review under Senate Bill 35 and are subject to a discretionary review. The Planning Commission’s action serves as a recommendation to the City Council.

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1) Recommend that the City Council find that Zoning Code Amendment 12-21- 5483 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and 2) Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT 12-21-5483, A CITY-INITIATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ADD CHAPTER 9.60 OF THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW MULTIFAMILY

PROJECTS IN THE CITY AND DETERMINE THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Attachment 2
Item: 10
144
ZC 12-21-5483 PC Agenda Report - February 3, 2022
2 of 6
1 7
7 8
BACKGROUND:

Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”) took effect in January 2018 and is codified in California Government Code Section 65913.4. Among other things, SB 35 requires local governments to implement a streamlined ministerial review process for qualifying multifamily housing developments. The intent of the law is to address housing affordability by expediting local governmental approvals for certain new housing development projects that meet eligibility criteria. Under SB 35, projects meeting all of the following requirements are eligible for streamlined review process:

 The development is on a legal parcel or parcels that is zoned for or has a General Plan designation for residential or residential mixed-use development (if mixed-use, must have at least two-thirds of the project’s square footage as residential);
 The project must be located on a parcel that has at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoining parcels that are developed with urban uses;  The development contains two or more residential units and complies with the minimum and maximum density range permitted for the site (plus any applicable density bonus);
 The project must meet specified affordability requirements. For example, if more than 10 residential units are proposed, then at least 50 percent of the project’s total units must be dedicated as affordable to households making below 80 percent of the area median income;
 The project site may not fall within any area listed in Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6). Put differently, if the project site falls within an area listed under Section 65913.4(a)(6), the project is ineligible for ministerial approval under SB 35. Examples of areas listed in Section 65913.4(a)(6) include, but are not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, floodways, high fire hazard severity zones (unless the site has adopted specified fire hazard mitigation measures), and any site where the project would demolish housing units that were occupied by tenants within the last 10 years;  The project provides at least one parking stall per unit, unless the project site is located within a half-mile to public transit or on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupants of the project;  The project does not involve an application to create separately transferrable parcels under the Subdivision Map Act (subject to limited exceptions);  The project meets specified prevailing wage requirements; and  The project must meet all objective design standards of the Zoning Code at the time of application submittal;
 Effective January 1, 2022 and until December 31, 2025, if the project consists of 25 or more units that are not 100 percent subsidized affordable Attachment 2
Item: 10
145
ZC 12-21-5483 PC Agenda Report - February 3, 2022
3 of 6
1 7
7 8
housing, the project proponent must certify that it will use a skilled and trained workforce, as defined in Government Code section 65913.4(8)(B)(ii).

Code §65913.4(a)(5).) Examples of objective design standards include setbacks and height requirements. Height and setback requirements are objective as compliance can be uniformly verified with a “tape” measure; subjective judgment does not enter the equation.

The proposed objective design standards would also apply to multifamily projects that do not meet the requirements of SB 35, as well as any residential portion of projects that are proposed in any of the new General Plan Mixed Use areas (MU43, MU35, MU25, UI43, UI25) in the interim period prior to the adoption of the Mixed Use Zoning regulations. In April of 2021, the City Council approved a contract with SWA for the preparation of the new Mixed Use zoning regulations. It is anticipated that the new Mixed Use Zoning regulations will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in the second quarter of 2022.

Staff has determined that the City’s existing Citywide Design Guidelines do not contemplate situations where state law requires the City to only impose objective standards.

ANALYSIS:

Attachment 2
Item: 10
146
ZC 12-21-5483 PC Agenda Report - February 3, 2022
4 of 6
1 7
7 8
As noted above, projects that are eligible for ministerial approval under state law would not require a public hearing or Planning Commission review. If the proposed project is not eligible for ministerial approval, then it would be subject to discretionary review. All multifamily projects—regardless of whether the project qualifies for ministerial approval under SB 35—will be subject to this ordinance’s objective design standards as well as all other objective site development standards dictated by the zoning district and General Plan designation (including setbacks, density requirements, lot coverage, building height, etc.). Table 1 below illustrates the different development projects that would be subject to these objective design standards and the approval process.

Table 1: Development Projects and Subject Review Types
Types of Projects Standard of Review Project Review Regulations Multifamily project
that meets the
requirements of SB
35 Ministerial
(Administrative
approval)
Objective Design Standards
Multifamily project
that does not meet
the requirements of
SB 35
Discretionary
(Planning
Commission
approval)
Objective Design Standards,
Citywide Design Guidelines,
Discretionary findings in
accordance with LFMC 9.184.040
Multifamily
component of a
Mixed Use project
with a General Plan
designation of MU
43, 32, 25, or UI 43,
25 Discretionary
(Planning
Commission
approval)
Objective Design Standards,
Citywide Design Guidelines,
Discretionary findings in
accordance with LFMC 9.184.040
Once the Mixed Use Zoning regulations have been adopted, projects in the Mixed Use areas would be subject to those regulations and the objective design standards would be revised to remove this project type from the applicability section.

As mentioned in Table 1, projects can either be subject to a ministerial or discretionary review depending on if the project qualifies for SB 35. If the project does meet the eligibility requirements for SB 35, the applicant would be required to provide proof of qualification for SB 35, as well as submit plans to the City to review. While this ministerial review can be approved administratively, staff will be Attachment 2
Item: 10
147
ZC 12-21-5483 PC Agenda Report - February 3, 2022
5 of 6
1 7
7 8
tasked with reviewing project documents to determine qualification for SB 35 and project design in accordance with the objective design standards. Therefore, staff has created an Applicant’s Guide and Eligibility Checklist for Streamlined Housing Projects (Attachment 3) which lists the requirements for project submittals. This document is similar to other Applicant’s Guides that staff has created for other discretionary projects and is not part of the Zoning Code.

Adoption of the proposed ordinance (Attachment 2) will establish clear and objective standards for new multifamily projects in the City. Such standards will prepare the City for SB 35 projects and ensure continued compliance with state law, as well set design standards for other multifamily projects, including those in the Mixed Use areas. For these reasons, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance (Attachment 2).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission find that ZC 12-21-5483 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which provides that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Zoning Code Amendment ZC 12-21-5483 will not have a significant effect on the environment as it simply establishes objective design review standards for multifamily projects in accordance with State law; it does not authorize construction or development. As the City receives individual multifamily project applications, projects subject to discretionary review will be reviewed in accordance with CEQA; projects subject to ministerial approval under SB 35 are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code Section 21080(b)(1).

PUBLIC NOTICING:

In accordance with California Government Code section 65090, this public hearing was noticed in the newspaper of general circulation on January 20, 2022. In addition, public notices were posted at City Hall. In substantial compliance with LFMC Section 9.196.020, the proposed ordinance was made available for public inspection on the City’s website at least ten (10) days prior to the February 3, 2022, Planning Commission public hearing.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 2
Item: 10
148
ZC 12-21-5483 PC Agenda Report - February 3, 2022
6 of 6
1 7
7 8

1. Draft Resolution for ZC 12-21-5483

2. Draft Ordinance for ZC 12-21-5483

3. Applicant’s Guide and Eligibility Checklist for Streamlined Housing Projects
Attachment 2
Item: 10
149

Attachment 3
Item: 10
150
Item: 10
151
Item: 10
152
Item: 10
153
Item: 10
154

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

PORTOLA PARK LIGHTING
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Provide direction to staff regarding potential new lighting at Portola Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On December 21, 2021, the City Council discussed various options for lighting at Portola Park and directed staff to return with updated costs to add lighting to the pickleball and volleyball courts as well as dog park areas of the park.

Staff researched updated costs for installing lighting at these the two locations.

For the first location, the pickleball/volleyball area, the estimated cost to purchase and install the lights and poles is $80,000. For the dog park area, the estimated cost to purchase and install the lights and poles is $120,000.

Staff seeks further direction from City Council regarding potential new lighting at Portola Park.

BACKGROUND:

In 2014, the City Council hired RJM Design Group, Inc. ("RJM”) to design Portola Park. As part of the design process, RJM held two community meetings to solicit input for park design features. Park lighting was a key topic of discussion at these public workshops. On October 16, 2015, the City Council approved the conceptual plans for Portola Park, which included lights as a potential additive option to be included in the construction contract for the park.

On August 20, 2019, the City Council considered the award of a construction contract for Portola Park, with three bid alternatives for City Council consideration that added various levels of lighting to the park. One was for lighting the pickleball and volleyball courts, one for lighting the dog park and walkways, and one for lighting the youth sports field and tot lot (Attachment 1). During the meeting, more than 15 residents provided public comments in opposition to any Item: 11
155
1 7
2 5
of the lighting alternatives. Staff noted at the meeting that the underground infrastructure necessary to facilitate the addition of lighting in the future was included with the base bid. City Council awarded the construction contract without exercising any of the three lighting options. The construction project included 25-foot tall lights in the parking lot, as well as 14-foot tall lights around the pedestrian path.

Portola Park opened in November 2020. Since then, the park, and the pickleball courts, have experienced high public usage. At the May 11, 2021, City Council Budget Workshop, City Council Member Cirbo received majority consensus to agendize a discussion regarding the installation of lights at Portola Park which occurred at the June 1, 2021 City Council meeting.

The City Council directed staff to initiate an outreach campaign to engage the public regarding the potential addition of new lights. Staff conducted a public outreach effort from June to October 2021. Outreach efforts indicated public support for the addition of lighting with the most support for lighting the pickleball courts (Attachments 2 and 3).

At its November 2, 2021, meeting, the City Council discussed various options for lighting at Portola Park and directed staff to return with updated estimated costs for the three lighting options. At the December 21, 2021 meeting City Council removed lighting of the turf fields as an option and directed staff to return with cost estimates for lighting the pickleball/volleyball and dog park areas only (Attachment 4).

DISCUSSION:

Pursuant to City Council direction, staff researched the estimated costs to add lighting at the volleyball/pickleball courts and around the dog park area. Staff contacted several lighting manufacturers and received quotes for the purchase of the lighting shown on the original construction plans for the park.

For the volleyball area, four 20-foot light poles are proposed around the volleyball area with single LED fixtures. For the pickleball area, eight 20-foot light poles are proposed, four poles with singles LED fixtures around the perimeter of the courts, and four poles between the play areas with double-headed LED fixtures (Attachment 5). The estimated cost for the purchase of the lighting and poles for the pickleball/volleyball area is approximately $30,000. Installation costs for the lights is estimated at $50,000, for a total of $80,000.

Item: 11
156
1 7
2 5
For the dog park area, a total of twenty 16-foot light poles are proposed. Five poles would light the pathway from the upper park down to the dog park area, and fifteen light poles would be installed around the perimeter of the dog park play area (Attachment 6). The estimated cost for purchase the lighting for the dog park area is approximately $45,000, with installation costs estimated at $75,000, for a total of $120,000.

Park hours for Portola Park, like all other City parks without sports fields or courts, is dawn to dusk. The addition of lighting would necessitate the City Council to determine new park hours. Currently, the City’s practice is to allow lighted athletic fields and/or courts to be open from dawn to 10:00 PM. If the City Council directs staff to pursue additional lighting at Portola Park, staff would bring back an item for the City Council to update the operational hours for the park.

The installation of lights at Portola Park is not included in the City’s 7-Year Capital Improvement Program. Should Council direct staff to proceed with the installation of either of the proposed options, staff would include the necessary budget adjustments at the mid-year budget review for a budget appropriation in April. Staff would also retain a design consultant to develop bid documents for the installation of the lighting and bid the project and return to City Council to award the construction project.

Staff estimates the project, including development of revised lighting plans, bidding the project for construction, purchasing materials, and installation would require approximately six to nine months to complete. Inasmuch as this item was placed on the agenda at the direction of the City Council, further action is at the City Council’s discretion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Fiscal impact is dependent on City Council discretion.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Public Works Portola Park Alternatives Presentation

2. Portola Park Lighting Website Survey

3. Portola Park Lighting Flash Vote Survey

4. Excerpt from City Council Meeting Minutes, December 21, 2021

5. Pickleball/Volleyball Light Locations

6. Dog Park Light Locations
Initiated By: Douglas Erdman, Engineering Services Mngr - Asst. City Eng.

Submitted By: Thomas Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Item: 11
157
1 7
2 5
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 11
158
ATTACHMENT 1
Item: 11
159
City Council Presentation
Public Works Department
Item: 11
160
Portola Park
2 Item: 11
161
Final Site Plan
3 Base Bid
Lighting:

Item: 11
162
Base Bid Lighting
Specifications
4 •Parking Lot
•Pole Height – 25 feet
•Lumen Output – 9,486 (132 Watt)
•Pedestrian Pathway
•Pole Height – 14 feet
•Lumen Output – 6,561 (71 Watt)
Item: 11
163
Site Plan and Alternatives
5 Lighting Alts:

Alt 1 – Dogpark
and walkway
Alt 2 – Pickelball
and Volleyball
Alt 3 – Musco
Lighting & Tot
Lot
Item: 11
164
Alt Lighting Specifications
6 • Alt 1 – Dog Park and Lower Tier Lighting
• Pole Height – 14 feet;
• Lumen Output – 6,561 (71 Watt)
• Alt 2 – Pickleball & Volleyball Lighting
• Pole Height – 20 feet;
• Lumen Output – 18,349 (206 Watt) – Single Fixture
• Alt 3 – Musco Lighting
• Pole Height – 50 feet;
• Lumen Output – 121,000 (1,150 Watt) – 4 Fixtures
• Alt 3 – Tot Lot
• Pole Height – 20 feet;
• Lumen Output – 18,349 (206 Watt)
Item: 11
165
Site Plan and Alternative
7 Alt 4 – Topcast
Concrete Finish
Item: 11
166
Concrete Finish
8 Broom Finish
Topcast Finish
Item: 11
167
Alternative Costs
•Alt 1 – Dog Park and Lower Tier Walkway Lighting
•$168,400
•Alt 2 – Pickelball and Volleyball Lighting
•$77,500
•Alt 3 – Musco Soccer and Tot Lot Lighting
•$246,000
•Alt 4 – Topcast Concrete Finish
•$43,000
9 Item: 11
168
Questions?
10 Item: 11
169
ATTACHMENT 2
Item: 11
170
Item: 11
171
Portola Park Website Survey
All Responses
593 total respondents
Portola HIlls Residents: 460 (78 percent)
Key: 1=Least Likely; 5=Most Likely
Question 1, All Respondents:

Item: 11
172
Question 2, All Respondents:

Item: 11
173
Question 3, All Respondents:

Item: 11
174
Question 4, All Respondents:

Item: 11
175
Question 5, All Respondents:

Item: 11
176
Question 6, All Respondents

Item: 11
177
Portola Hills Resident Responses:
460 residents (78%)
Question 1, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
178
Question 2, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
179
Question 3, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
180
Question 4, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
181
Question 5, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
182
Question 6, Portola Hills Residents Only:

Item: 11
183
ATTACHMENT 3
Item: 11
184
Item: 11
185
Reponses to open-ended “Would like to see more lighting at:”

Item: 11
186

Item: 11
187
Attachment 4
Item: 11
188

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTE EXCERPT P REPARED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK DECEMBER 21, 2021
Page No. 1

MINUTE EXCERPT

LAKE FOREST REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 21, 2021
____________________________________________________________

14. ELIMINATION OF CONSIDERATION OF ADDING LIGHTS FOR SOCCER AT

PORTOLA PARK
MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Cirbo and seconded by Council Member Tettemer to eliminate further discussion on soccer center lighting and focus on lighting options for the pickleball courts, which also includes the volleyball area, and the dog park only.

The motion passed 4/0/1 with Mayor Voigts abstaining from the vote.

Item: 11
189
Attachment 5
Item: 11
190

Attachment 6
Item: 11
192

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

VETERANS PARK MEMORIAL FLAGPOLE DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Provide Direction to staff regarding the installation of a flagpole at Veterans Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On January 4, 2022, City Council directed staff to provide design options and cost estimates for the installation of a flagpole at Veterans Park. Staff researched two options for installing and lighting a flagpole at the monument plaza. The first option would install the flagpole and lighting in the rose garden landscaped area behind the monuments with an approximate cost of $9,420. The second option would relocate the tree within the center of the plaza and install the flagpole and lighting in place of the tree, with an approximate cost of $14,380 and an increased risk of damaging the surrounding concrete and tree.

Staff seeks further direction from City Council on this item.

BACKGROUND:

On October 19, 2021, Mayor Pro Tem Pequeño received majority consensus from Council Member Cirbo and Mayor Voigts to bring back a discussion item related to the potential installation of a flagpole to fly the American flag at the Veterans Park memorial (Attachment 1).

At the January 4, 2022, City Council meeting, staff provided Council the background for the origins of the memorial planning and construction of Veterans Park (Attachment 2). After discussion, Council directed staff to develop several design options and cost estimates for the installation of a flagpole at the Veterans Monument City Council meeting.

Item: 12
194
1 8
7 9
DISCUSSION:

Staff researched two options for locating a flagpole at Veterans Park, installing the flagpole behind the existing monuments in the rose garden area, and removing the tree in the center of the plaza and installing the flagpole in this location.

The US Flag Code states that it is custom to display the flag only from sunrise to sunset on buildings and on stationary flagstaffs in the open. However, when a patriotic effect is desired, the flag may be displayed 24 hours a day if properly illuminated during the hours of darkness. As such, staff looked at both lighting costs and motorized flagpoles that automatically retract the flag at sunset and extend the flag at sunrise.

Staff investigated the potential to use sunlight photocell activated automated flagpoles. However, staff found that they would not allow for the ability to lower the flag to half-staff and staff was further concerned with potential maintenance and operating challenges. Therefore, this option was rejected in favor of lighting the flagpole for 24-hour display.

The original concept drawings for the Veterans Plaza, prepared by Nuvis showed a flagpole within the center of the plaza (Attachment 3).

In addition, staff prepared several photo simulations of a flagpole installed behind the existing monuments in the rose garden area.

Item: 12
195
1 8
7 9
Item: 12
196
1 8
7 9
With both location options, staff recommends the installation of a 30’ aluminum flagpole with internal winch for raising and lowering the flag. The cost for the purchase of the flagpole with shipping is estimated at $5,000 with installation costing an additional $3,150.

The primary difference in costs between the two options is related to the location of the flagpole. The lighting cost for the installation of the flag in the rose garden area behind the monuments is estimated at $1,270.

Installation of the flagpole within the center of the plaza would require the relocation of the existing tree, and installation of electrical conduit, via boring under the existing concrete plaza. The cost to relocate the tree is estimated at $1,350, and installation of the electrical conduit and lighting via boring under the existing plaza concrete is $4,880. Removing the tree and installing the conduit also increases the potential to damage the existing tree and concrete work throughout the plaza area. The breakdown of both options is listed in the table below.

Item: 12
197
1 8
7 9
Option 1
Rose Garden
Option 2
Center of Plaza
Purchase of Flag Pole
plus Shipping $5,000 $5,000
Flag Pole
Footing/Installation $3,150 $3,150
Installation of Electrical
Conduit & Lighting $1,270 $4,880
Tree Relocation Not Needed $1,350
Total $9,420 $14,380
Should Council direct staff to proceed with the installation of one of the proposed options, staff would order the material and install the improvements. Staff would bring a budget adjustment to the City Council at mid-year for a budget appropriation for the project. The estimated timeline for installation of the flagpole, once a budget has been appropriated, would be two to three months, depending on the lead time for delivery of the equipment.

Inasmuch as this item was placed on the agenda at the direction of the City Council, further action is at the City Council’s discretion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Fiscal impact is dependent on City Council discretion.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Excerpt from City Council Meeting Minutes, October 19, 2021

2. Staff Report from January 4, 2022, City Council Meeting

3. Proposed Designs for Veterans Monument at Veterans Park Initiated By: Douglas Erdman, Engineering Services Mngr - Asst. City Eng.

Submitted By: Thomas Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 12
198

Attachment 1
Item: 12
199

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MINUTE EXCERPT PREPARED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OCTOBER 19, 2021
Page No. 1

MINUTE EXCERPT

LAKE FOREST REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 19, 2021
____________________________________________________________

During the City Council comment period of the City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Pequeño received majority consensus from Mayor Voigts and Council Members Moatazedi, Tettemer and Cirbo to to discuss the proposal of installing a flagpole to fly the American flag at Veteran's Park.

Item: 12
200

Attachment 2
Item: 12
201

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 01/04/2022
DEPARTMENT: Management Services

SUBJECT:

VETERANS PARK MEMORIAL DISCUSSION

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Exercise City Council discretion regarding a flagpole at the Veterans Park Memorial.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On October 19, 2021, Mayor Pro Tem Pequeño received majority consensus from Council Member Cirbo and Mayor Voigts to bring back a discussion item related to the absence of a flag at the Veterans Park memorial (Attachment 1).

Staff has provided the origins of the memorial planning and construction of Veterans Park below.

In May of 2013, a contract was awarded to NUVIS Landscape Architecture (“NUVIS”) to develop a conceptual plan for the renovation of Village Pond Park. 1 Staff conducted a series of outreach workshops in the late summer and early fall of 2013 to receive input from the surrounding community regarding the park renovation. NUVIS attended these meetings with staff to hear community feedback and shape the conceptual design of the park. Upon conclusion of its workshop series, NUVIS presented its results to the Parks and Recreation Commission (now referred to as the “Community Services Commission”) in November of 2013. The results of the workshops included addressing the overpopulation of waterfowl and other avian species, adding trees and fountain geysers, replacement of vegetation to deter waterfowl, and removal of a concrete walkway near the pond. Many residents expressed their opposition to constructing restrooms or play areas at the park, preferring to keep the park quiet and passive. After receiving feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission, NUVIS presented the conceptual plan to the City Council on August 5, 2014. Subsequently, on November 18, 2014, the City Council approved a contract with NUVIS for the final design element of Village Pond Park and awarded the contract for construction of the park on March 7, 2017.

1 Village Pond Park was renamed Veterans Park in 2017.

Item: 12
202

During its July 18, 2017 meeting, amid the construction phase of the project, the City Council approved renaming Village Pond Park to “Veterans Park” to recognize those who have served in the military. The City Council also directed staff to create and work with a resident committee to design a park feature to honor veterans. Staff notified residents within a 500-foot radius of the park, sent emails to those who attended the first set of outreach workshops in 2013 (approximately 158 people), and reached out to the Lake Forest United States Marine Corp Support Committee that adopted the First Law Enforcement Battalion at Camp Pendleton. Staff also posted information on the City’s social media outlets and provided the OC Register newspaper with information about the park, who ran a news story shortly thereafter. Twelve individuals participated on the formed Veterans Park Commemorative Committee (“Committee”), including residents from the community and surrounding neighborhood, Commissioners, and City Council members Basile and Gardner. The Committee met four times over a period of three months, and NUVIS was present to receive feedback and provide design options to the Committee for review.

At the November 21, 2017 City Council meeting, NUVIS presented the proposed design for the Veterans Monument at Veterans Park (Attachment 2) with an option for a flagpole or tree in the center. The conceptual design offered six monuments, five of which were representative of each branch of the military and the other with an inscription acknowledging the memorial itself, encircling a flagpole. Aware of the typical placement of flagpoles in veteran memorials, NUVIS chose to address this element in a creative manner by including a mosaic of tiles at the top of each military branch monument, replicating a folded American flag. This decision not only made the Lake Forest Veterans Park memorial original, but it also alleviated the need for a flagpole, resolving the concerns of nearby residents related to potential light pollution caused by the upward lighting required for a flagpole and to prevent vandals from defacing the flag. Furthermore, since the project had been budgeted at $100,000 and the addition of the flagpole would increase the budget by $3,000, this decision also considered financial implications. However, at the Committee’s final meeting, they suggested having a flagpole instead of the tree. Therefore, that option was presented by NUVIS to the City Council and recommended by staff during its November 21, 2017 meeting, along with a $3,000 budget adjustment to add the flagpole.

During the public comment portion of the item at the November 21, 2017, City Council Meeting, eight individuals spoke. While much of the discussion was related to restroom facilities, the opinions on the flagpole were split. Those in favor of the tree justified their selection by adherence to the community’s original design feedback from 2013 that the park should be a quiet and reflective space.

Those in favor of a flagpole indicated concerns over the tree’s attractiveness to birds, as well as a desire to adhere to tradition, where a flag and flagpole are a typical component of an installation honoring veterans.

Item: 12
203

Following public comment, the City Council ultimately approved the design with the tree at the center of the memorial instead of the flagpole by a 3-2 vote. The City Council members in support of the tree noted that it would help maintain the contemplative and passive feel of the park. The City Council also approved reducing the surrounding monuments to five, by removing the sixth monument without a military designation, and instead etching the proposed language into the concrete around the memorial. (Attachment 3).

The Veterans Park project was completed and the park opened in the fall of 2018. To date, staff has received few complaints regarding the memorial area of the park. For reference, below are photos of what the memorial section of Veterans Park looks like today.

Item: 12
204

Item: 12
205

Inasmuch as this item was placed on the agenda at the direction of the City Council, further action is at the City Council’s discretion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Fiscal impact is dependent on City Council discretion.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Excerpt from City Council Meeting Minutes, October 19, 2021

2. Proposed Designs for Veterans Monument at Veterans Park

3. Excerpt from City Council Meet ing Minutes, November 21, 2017

Initiated By: Nicole Housto n, Management Assistant
Submitted By: Brett Channi ng, Deputy City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 12
206

Attachment 3
Item: 12
207
Lake Forest, CACity of Lake ForestCONCEPTUAL RENDERINGVeterans Memorial -451-
Item No. 11.

Item: 12
208
Lake Forest, CACity of Lake ForestCONCEPTUAL RENDERINGVeterans Memorial -452-
Item No. 11.

Item: 12
209
T
Lake Forest, CACity of Lake ForestCONCEPTUAL PLANVeterans Memorial MANUAL AMERICAN FLAG POLE ORTREE WITH SPOT LIGHTINGPLAZA WITH ENHANCEDCOLORED PAVINGCONCRETE BANDBACKLESS CONCRETE BENCHARMY, MARINES, NAVY,AIR FORCE, & COAST GUARDMEMORIAL SCULPTUREWITH MOSAIC FLAG. TOTALOF 5 SCULPTURES

MONUMENT WITH CITY SEAL AND PLAQUEROSE GROUNDCOVER
-453-
Item No. 11.

Item: 12
210

Lake Forest City CouncilMarch 1, 2022

Lake Forest City Council
March 1, 2022