Agenda packet — Lakeport City Council, June 18, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

If you cannot attend in person, and would like to speak on an agenda item, you can access the Zoom meeting remotely:

Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device:

Please click this URL to join. https://zoom.us/j/97368201787?pwd=a2NvVnN6MEFjQ2Exc2pTZkpIdU1sQT09 Passcode: 477973
Or join by phone:

Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):

US: +1 669 900 9128 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 Webinar ID: 973 6820 1787
Passcode: 477973
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/abNyiaqY1I The City wants you to know that you can also submit your comments by email to [email protected].

To give the City Clerk adequate time to print out your comments for consideration at the meeting, please submit your written comments prior to 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.

Please indicate in the email Subject Line "FOR PUBLIC COMMENT" and list the item number you wish to comment on.

Comments that you want read to the Council will be subject to the three minute time limitation (approximately 350 words).

Written comments that are only to be provided to Council and not read at the meeting will be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting.

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL
(ALSO MEETS AS THE CITY OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT, THE LAKEPORT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE MUNICIPAL FINANCING AGENCY OF LAKEPORT and THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE FORMER LAKEPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California 95453 See Teleconferencing Instructions Below
City Council Agenda of June 18, 2024 Page 2
AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL
(ALSO MEETS AS THE CITY OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT, THE

LAKEPORT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE MUNICIPAL FINANCING AGENCY OF LAKEPORT and THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LAKEPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)*
Tuesday, June 18, 2024, 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California 95453 *All references to “City Council” include those other agencies which are listed above The City Council may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on the agenda irrespective of how the agenda items are described. The council may establish and make appointments to a Council committee (made up of two Councilmembers) with respect to any item appearing on this agenda.

I. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL: 6:00 p.m.

II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

III. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA/ URGENCY
ITEMS:

Move to accept agenda as posted or move to add or delete items.

To add item, Council is required to make a majority decision that an urgency exists (as defined in the Brown Act) and a 2/3rds determination that the need to take action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.

IV. CONSENT AGENDA: The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without any discussion. Any Council Member may request that any item be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion under the regular Agenda. Removed items will be considered following the Consent Calendar portion of this agenda.

A. Ordinances: Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.

B. Minutes: Approve minutes of the City Council regular meeting of June 4, 2024.

C. Application 2024-024: Approve application 2024-026, with staff recommendations, for the Golden Gate Lotus Club Car Show.

D. Notice of Completion: Adopt the resolution accepting construction of GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, by Wylatti Resource Management, Inc. and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion.

E. Warrants: Approve the warrant register of June 6, 2024.

F. Contract Amendment: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project in the amount of $21,635.74.

V. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/REQUESTS:

A. Public Input: Any person may speak for 3 minutes about any subject within the authority of the City Council, provided that the subject is not already on tonight’s agenda. Per Government Code §54954.3(a), the City Council cannot take action or express a consensus of approval or disapproval on any public comments regarding matters which do not appear on the printed agenda.

B. Proclamation: Present a proclamation honoring Compliance Officer Andrew Britton on his retirement after 35 years of service the City of Lakeport.

VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

VII. COUNCIL BUSINESS:

City Council Agenda of June 18, 2024 Page 3
A. Public Works Director

1. Curfew Bell: Approve the placement of the historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in Xabatin Park, as outlined in the staff report. Additionally, move to acknowledge and thank the Lakeport Rotary Club for their generous contribution.

2. Adoption of the Project
Study Report-Project
Development Support
(PSR-PDS) for the SR-29
and Lakeport Interchange
Improvement Project:

Adopt a resolution adopting the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project.

B. Assistant City Manager

1. Solid Waste Study: Set a public hearing on September 3, 2024, for adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and direct staff to issue Proposition 218 Notice.

C. Utilities Director

1. Utilities Operation
Report:

Receive and file an overview of the current projects associated with water and sewer infrastructure improvements.

D. Police Chief

1. Police Statistics &
Training Summary Report
for 2023, and 2023 Use of
Force Annual Report:

Receive and file the Police Statistics & Use of Force Reports for year 2023, and the Police Training Report for fiscal year 2023-2024.

E. Assistant City Manager

1. FY 2024-2025 Budget: Approve the operating and capital expenditure budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year and adopt the associated resolution.

2. Appropriations Limit: Approve the annual appropriations limit for the City of Lakeport and adopt the associated resolution.

VIII. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

A. Travel, Calendar, and
Miscellaneous Reports, if any:

ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California, during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lakeport’s website, www.cityoflakeport.com, subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

The City of Lakeport, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend and/or participate in the City meeting due to disability, to please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (707) 263-5615, 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to ensure reasonable accommodations are provided.
_______________________________________
Hilary Britton, Deputy City Clerk
City Council Minutes of June 4, 2024 Page 2

MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL
(ALSO MEETS AS THE CITY OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT, THE

LAKEPORT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE MUNICIPAL FINANCING AGENCY OF LAKEPORT and THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LAKEPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)*
Tuesday, June 4, 2024, 6:00 p.m.

I. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL: Mayor Froio called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m., with Mayor Froio, Council Members Costa, Disney, Mattina, and Parlet present.

II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Bob Santana.

III. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA/ URGENCY
ITEMS:

A motion was made by Council Member Mattina, seconded by Council Member Disney, and unanimously carried by voice vote 5-0-0-0 to accept agenda as posted.

A. Ordinances: Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.

B. Minutes: Approve minutes of the City Council regular meeting of May 21, 2024.

C. Application 2024-024: Approve application 2024-024, with staff recommendations, for the Movie Night at Xabatin event.

D. Application 2024-025: Approve application 2024-025, with staff recommendations, for Rotary’s Christmas Trees on Main Street.

Vote on Consent Agenda: Council member Mattina announced that she has a conflict of interest on item C and will be abstaining from vote on that item.

A motion was made by Council Member Parlet, seconded by Council Member Mattina, and unanimously carried by voice vote 5-0-0-0 to approve the Consent Agenda, items A-D, with Council member Mattina abstaining from vote on item C.

V. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/REQUESTS:

A. Public Input: Nancy Ruzicka spoke about economic development in the City of Lakeport and training staff to be more solution-oriented. She further asked the Council to be more active participants at the airport.

Bob Santana spoke about efforts of local pilots to maintain the airport.

B. Presentation: A presentation of the Lakeport Main Street Association’s Annual Report was presented by LMSA President, Bob Santana.

Christine Reitz invited the City Council to their Monday Mixers.

David Flaeg encouraged City Council support of LMSA and spoke about the Splash-In event.

City Council Minutes of June 4, 2024 Page 3
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

VII. COUNCIL BUSINESS:

A. Assistant City Manager

1. Reserve and Pension
Policy Update:

The staff report was presented by Assistant City Manager Walker.

A motion was made by Council Member Costa, seconded by Council Member Parlet, and unanimously carried by voice vote 5-0-0-0 to approve the updates to the Reserve and Pension Policy.

2. Budget Workshop: The proposed budget was presented by Assistant City Manager Walker and City Manager Ingram.

Mayor Froio conducted workshop to review the recommended FY 2024-25 budget.

B. Administrative Services Director

1. Utilities Classifications
and Position Allocation:

The staff report was presented by Administrative Services Director Buendia.

1. A motion was made by Council Member Costa, seconded by Council Member Parlet, and unanimously carried by voice vote 5-0-0-0, to approve proposed changes to the Utilities Superintendent; changes to the Water/Wastewater Treatment Supervisor; and add a Utilities Underground Supervisor classification, conditioned upon the meet and confer process with the appropriate bargaining units.

2. A motion was made by Council Member Costa, seconded by Council Member Parlet, and unanimously carried by voice vote 5-0-0-0 to approve the Utilities reorganization including the removal of the Water Operations Supervisor, Wastewater Operations Supervisor, and Maintenance Worker III positions and the addition of Utilities Superintendent, Water/Wastewater Treatment Supervisor and Utilities Underground Supervisor positions, conditioned upon the meet and confer process with the appropriate bargaining units.

C. Utilities Director

1. 2024 Water & Sewer
Main Replacement
Project Award:

The staff report was presented by Utilities Director Harris.

Council member Disney recused himself from discussion on this item due to his ownership of a business property located within 500 feet of the project. Council member Disney left the Council Chamber during discussion of this item.

A motion was made by Council Member Parlet, seconded by Council Member Mattina, and unanimously carried by voice vote 4-0-1-0, with Council Member Disney abstaining, to approve the plans, specifications and working details and award a construction contract to Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc. for the 2024 Water & Sewer Main Replacement Project and authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract for the bid amount of $8,042,049.00.

VIII. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

A. Travel, Calendar, and
Miscellaneous Reports, if any:

City Attorney Ruderman had no report.

City Council Minutes of June 4, 2024 Page 4
City Manager Ingram advised the Council that there will be a 5 minute fireworks show at the CLHS Graduation on Friday.

Captain Stoebe had no report.

Public Works Director Ladd had no report.

Community Development Director Hejnowicz had no report.

Administrative Services Director Buendia had no report.

Assistant City Manager Walker had no report.

Utilities Director Harris had no report.

Council Member Parlet that the Rotary Club continued their tradition at CLHS for awarding their “Top 40” award to students.

Council Member Costa expressed her enthusiasm for the day camp project the Lake County Recreation Agency is working on.

Council Member Disney reported that Lake County Recreation Agency met and they are working on day camp for kids at the County Park.

Council Member Mattina reported that the CLHS Senior Parade and BBQ went well.

Mayor Froio reported that Don Smith had offered to work with Tribal Health, Sutter Health and Adventist Health to get those entities to help fund the Lake County Recreation Agency.

IX. CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Froio adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 8:21 p.m. to consider the following:

1. Conference with Legal Counsel; Existing Litigation (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1))
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.

City of Lakeport et al. v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al. (NDO MDL 1:20-op-45242-DAP)
Report out of Closed Session: Mayor Froio adjourned back to Open Session at 8:41 p.m. to report that the City Council, by a vote of 5-0-0-0, has approved adding the pharmacy benefit managers as defendants in the consolidated opioid litigation. Those pharmacy benefit managers, such as ExpressScripts and OptumRX, there are relevant Express Scripts entities the names of which can be obtained through the City Clerk’s office.

ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Froio adjourned the meeting at 8:42 p.m. _______________________________________
Michael Froio, Mayor
Attest:
_____________________________
Kelly Buendia, City Clerk

CITY OF LAKEPORT
225 Park Street Please Note: Phone: (707) 263-5615, Ext. 102 Lakeport, CA 95453 Bounce Houses and Waterslides are prohibited Fax: (707) 263-8584

APPLICATION FOR USE OF PUBLIC AREAS
Please note: City Council meetings are held the FIRST and THIRD TUESDAY of the month. Application forms require City Council approval and must be completed and submitted to the City Clerk at least one month prior to the Council meeting at which they will be considered.

This section to be completed by City:

Application Received (Date): Application No.
$15.00 Application Fee Paid For Council Meeting of (Date):

This section to be completed by Applicant (please answer all questions with as much detail as possible):

Applicant Name: Organization Name:

Address: Address:

Home Phone: Work Phone: Mobile Phone:

Email Address: Website/Facebook Page:

Other Contact: Phone for Other Contact:

Organization is: Nonprofit Organization For Profit Organization Name of Event:

Description of Event:

Public Area of Use: ☐ Main Street ☐ Library Park ☐ Silveira Community Center Parking Lot ☐ Xabatin Community Park Specific Location of Event (Map Must be Attached):

Does this use involve public right of way, streets, or sidewalk? Yes No If yes, please indicate specific location:

If requesting closure of streets, sidewalk, etc., please describe notification procedure for affected businesses and/or residences:

Date(s) of Event: Total Number of Days: Set Up Time:

Time of Event:

Tear Down Time:
-
Specify anticipated number of people (both participants and the public):

Will any vendors be present? Yes No Will any food booths be present? Yes No Requirements:

Electricity (cannot be guaranteed by City)
Barricades
Street/Sidewalk Closures
No irrigation in park prior to event
Other (please specify):

Coordination of these requirements must be made through the Public Works Department: (707) 263-0751
Specific City Staff Needs:

Police
Public Works
Parks
Other (please specify):

The City reserves the right to bill applicant for related City costs.

INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
Note: The insurance certificate provided to the City by your organization’s insurance company must name the City of Lakeport as an additional insured for the event specified in this application and must include a copy of any endorsements, including Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance provided to the City as an additional insured shall be primary to, and non-contributory with any insurance or self-insurance program maintained by the City. The minimum coverage amount required is $2,000,000. The certificate and endorsements must also be in a form acceptable to risk management and available for review 15 working days prior to the scheduled event. 2024-026
06/18/2024
USE OF ALCOHOL: Is a permit for alcoholic beverages requested? Yes No If you have checked yes, you must obtain a signed permit from the Lakeport Police Department and attach it to this application. This will allow for consumption of alcoholic beverages in connection with the event but will NOT allow for the SALE of alcoholic beverages. If alcoholic beverages are going to be sold or included with the price of any ticket or admission to the event, then the applicant is required to obtain a one-day license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. This one-day permit would be required in addition to a permit by the Lakeport Police Department.

HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
In consideration of allowing the event(s) specified in this application, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, I/we agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lakeport and its agents and “employees” from and against any injury, damage, claims, actions or suits arising out of the herein described Event, including those caused by negligence of the parties being indemnified and/or any dangerous condition of property of the parties being indemnified, and further agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Lakeport from and against any injury, damage, claims, actions or suits arising out of or connected with the foregoing event(s).

COVID-19 WAIVER
I, the undersigned, acknowledge the contagious nature of COVID-19 and voluntarily assume the risk that myself and others attending my event may be exposed to or infected by COVID-19. I agree to having all attendees follow CDC and Lake County Department of Public Health recommendations for enhanced health and safety measures related to COVID-19 and follow all posted instructions while using City facilities; including requirements for social distancing, wearing of face coverings, participant grouping, types of activities allowed, and potential limits on event size.
________________________________________________ Dated:

Signature of Applicant
Responsible Official of Applicant Organization

STAFF RESPONSE
This section to be completed by City and Other Affected Agencies:

Staff Name: Department:

No Fiscal Impact Fiscal Impact
(Describe/Include Estimated Costs)
Police
Public Works
Parks
Other (please specify):

The following will be Required:

Business License Health Department Permit
ABC License Other (Specify):

Staff Comments:

This section to be completed by City Clerk following Council meeting:

Considered at Council Meeting (Date): Application Approved Application Denied
Application Approved With Conditions (See Below)
Conditions of Approval:

Attachments (specify):

RE: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Ron Ladd <[email protected]>
Thu 6/6/2024 7:48 AM
To:Hilary Britton <[email protected]>;Amanda Frazell <[email protected]>;Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>;Lisa Davey-Bates <[email protected]>;Lori Price <[email protected]>;Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>;Sheriff's Dept <[email protected]>;Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>;Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>;Bethany Moss <[email protected]>;Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>;Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>;Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>;Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>;Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>;Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>;Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>;Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> Hilary,
I have a couple of comments:

1. Street and Sidewalk Closures: We need a map clearly indicating the areas of street and sidewalk closures.

Please specify the exact times for both the closures and reopenings.

2. Parking on Grass: Our policy does not permit parking on the grass for car shows.

Thank you,
Ron
Ron Ladd/Public Works Director/Public Works Dept.

City of Lakeport/591 Martin St./ Lakeport CA 95453
Phone: 707.263.3578 ext. 401 / FAX 707.263.1514
Email: [email protected]
From: Hilary Britton <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:39 AM
To: Amanda Frazell <[email protected]>; Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>; Lisa DaveyBates <[email protected]>; Lori Price <[email protected]>; Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>; Ron Ladd <[email protected]>; Sheriff's Dept <[email protected]>; Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>; Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>; Bethany Moss <[email protected]>; Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>; Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>; Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>; Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>; Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>; Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>; Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>; Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> Subject: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Hi all,
Please find attached application 2024-026 for the Lotus Club Car Show for your review and comments.

We would like to submit this for City Council approval at the 06/18/2021 Council meeting, so please have your comments back to me by 06/13/2024.

Thank you for your input!
Hilary Britton
Deputy City Clerk/Records Supervisor
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-5615 x102
[email protected]
E-mail correspondence and attachments with the City of Lakeport may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. *For Public Records Act requests, please visit our online public records request system Re: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>
Thu 6/6/2024 10:39 AM
To:Hilary Britton <[email protected]>
Cc:Amanda Frazell <[email protected]>;Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>;Lisa Davey-Bates <[email protected]>;Lori Price <[email protected]>;Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>;Ron Ladd <[email protected]>;Sheriff's Dept <[email protected]>;Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>; Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>;Bethany Moss <[email protected]>;Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>;Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>;Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>; Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>;Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>;Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>;Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> No additional comments beyond City's standard requirements for outdoor events.

Thanks,
Patrick Reitz, Fire Chief
Lakeport Fire Protection District
445 N Main St
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-4396, x102
[email protected]
www.lakeportfire.com
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 7:38 AM Hilary Britton <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all,
Please find attached application 2024-026 for the Lotus Club Car Show for your review and comments.

We would like to submit this for City Council approval at the 06/18/2021 Council meeting, so please have your comments back to me by 06/13/2024.

Thank you for your input!
Hilary Britton
Deputy City Clerk/Records Supervisor
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-5615 x102
RE: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>
Thu 6/6/2024 9:21 AM
To:Ron Ladd <[email protected]>;Hilary Britton <[email protected]>;Amanda Frazell <[email protected]>;Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>;Lisa Davey-Bates <[email protected]>; Lori Price <[email protected]>;Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>;Sheriff's Dept <[email protected]>;Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>;Bethany Moss <[email protected]>;Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>;Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>;Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>;Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>;Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>;Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>;Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>;Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> Other than Ron’s identified issues, the police have no other concerns.

Dale D Stoebe
Captain
Lakeport Police Department
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).

Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

From: Ron Ladd <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:48 AM
To: Hilary Britton <[email protected]>; Amanda Frazell <[email protected]>; Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>; Lisa Davey-Bates <[email protected]>; Lori Price <[email protected]>; Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>; Sheriff's Dept <[email protected]>; Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>; Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>; Bethany Moss <[email protected]>; Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>; Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>; Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>; Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>; Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>; Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>; Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>; Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Hilary,
I have a couple of comments:

1. Street and Sidewalk Closures: We need a map clearly indicating the areas of street and sidewalk closures.

Please specify the exact times for both the closures and reopenings.

2. Parking on Grass: Our policy does not permit parking on the grass for car shows.

Thank you,
Ron
Ron Ladd/Public Works Director/Public Works Dept.

We would like to submit this for City Council approval at the 06/18/2021 Council meeting, so please have your comments back to me by 06/13/2024.

Memorandum
DATE: June 10, 2024
TO: Hilary Britton, Deputy City Clerk/Records Supervisor FROM: Pheakdey Preciado, Senior EHS
RE: Golden Gate Lotus Club/SR0005517
The Environmental Health Division has no concerns since the community event (on October 19, 20224) will not be selling or giving food away.

COUNTY OF LAKE
Health Services Department
Environmental Health Division
922 Bevins Court
Lakeport, California 95453-9739
Telephone 707/263-1164
FAX 707/263-1681
Anthony Arton
Health Services Director
Noemi Doohan, MD, PhD, MPH
Public Health Officer
Craig Wetherbee
Environmental Health Director
Promoting an Optimal State of Wellness in Lake County
FW: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Lake County Sheriff - Records <[email protected]> Fri 6/7/2024 11:43 AM
To:Hilary Britton <[email protected]>
Please see Sheriffs office response below
From: Richard Ward <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 10:14 AM
To: Lake County Sheriff - Records <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse No concerns from the Sheriff’s Office.

Lieutenant Rich Ward
Lake County Sheriff’s Office
1220 Martin St.

P.O. Box 489
Lakeport, Ca. 95453
(707) 262-4081 Desk
(707) 262-4220 Fax
(707) 262-4200 Administration
[email protected]
www.lakesheriff.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

From: Lake County Sheriff - Records <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 8:47 AM
To: Richard Ward <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Please see below
From: Hilary Britton <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:39 AM
To: Dean Eichelmann <[email protected]>; Johnnie Lindsey <[email protected]>; Lisa DaveyBates <[email protected]>; Lori Price <[email protected]>; Pheakdey Preciado <[email protected]>; Ron Ladd <[email protected]>; Lake County Sheriff - Records <[email protected]>; Dale Stoebe <[email protected]>; Victor Fernandez <[email protected]>; Bethany Moss <[email protected]>; Katie Carpenter <[email protected]>; Kelly Buendia <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Patrick Reitz <[email protected]>; Jim Kennedy <[email protected]>; Linda Sobieraj <[email protected]>; Matt Hartzog <[email protected]>; Michelle Humphrey <[email protected]>; Ryan Cooley <[email protected]>; Ky Ramsey <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Application 20224-026 - West Coast Lotus Meet Concourse Hi all,
Please find attached application 2024-026 for the Lotus Club Car Show for your review and comments.

We would like to submit this for City Council approval at the 06/18/2021 Council meeting, so please have your comments back to me by 06/13/2024.

Thank you for your input!
Hilary Britton
Deputy City Clerk/Records Supervisor
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-5615 x102
[email protected]
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item #IV.D.

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Development Agency
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport

STAFF REPORT
RE: Notice of Completion for the GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Bid No. 23-02
MEETING DATE: 6/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Ron Ladd, Public Works Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution accepting the GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Bid No. 23-02, as complete and authorize the City Manager to file a Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On January 29, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Wylatti Resource Management, Inc., for the GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Bid No. 23-02, in the amount of $444,113.35.

The project consisted of rehabilitating and placing new pavement on Green Street and Loch Drive and portions of Sayre Street and Hillcrest Drive. Various damaged sidewalk sections were replaced, and ADA complaint curb ramps were installed.

The City of Lakeport Public Works Department has reviewed the project and determined that it has been completed in substantial compliance with the project plans and specifications. The total cost of the construction contract came out to $461,477.18.

The additional costs were due to a reconciliation of actual quantities of work items measured in the field compared to the estimated quantities at bidding. There were additional locations of damaged sidewalk replaced and some additional work needed to prepare the subsurface of the road prior to paving.

OPTIONS:

No other options recommended.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $ Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:

Comments:

This project has $133,000 of funding through the State’s COVID Relief Program.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item #IV.D.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☐ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☒ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☐ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to adopt the resolution accepting construction of GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, by Wylatti Resource Management, Inc. and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion.

Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Notice of Completion
RESOLUTION NO. XXX___ ( 2024 )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF THE GSL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT, BID NO. 23-02, AND

AUTHORIZINGTHE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the final inspection of the GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Bid No. 23-02, was made by the City of Lakeport’s Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, it was determined that the work for this project has been completed in substantial compliance with the project plans and specifications.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby accepts the work as completed on the GSL Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Bid No. 23-02.

2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Notice of Completion to be filed with the County of Lake.

The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lakeport held on the on the 18th day of June, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Froio, Mayor
City of Lakeport
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Hilary Britton , Deputy City Clerk
City of Lakeport
4D.2 GSL Notice of Completion

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of lakeport

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED,
UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW.

MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:

City of Lakeport Attn: Olivia Grupp
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
Complimentary recording request pursuant to
government code § 27383
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
Notice of Completion
NOTICE is hereby given that:

1. The Undersigned is owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described:

2. The NAME (including that of the undersigned), ADDRESS and NATURE OF TITLE of every person owning any interest in such property is as follows:

City of Lakeport 225 Park St, Lakeport, CA 95453 Fee Simple (NAME OF UNDERSIGNED)

3. The names and addresses of the transferors of the undersigned owner: (to be shown if the undersigned is a successor in interest of the owner who caused the improvement to be constructed, etc.)

4. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED ON 5/15/2024

5. The name of the CONTRACTOR for such work of improvement was Wylatti Resource Management, Inc. (If no Contractor, insert “NONE”

6. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Lakeport , county of Lake State of California, and is described as follows: Removed and replaced concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, install ADA complaint curb ramps, cold planing, full-depth reclamation-cement, HMA paving, protecting and adjusting utilities, pavement markings

7. The street address of said property is: Green Street, Sayre Street, Hillcrest Drive and Loch Drive Dated:

Signature of
Owner or Owners }
Kevin M. Ingram, City Manager
Verification for NON-INDIVIDUAL owner: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the City Manager of the aforesaid interest or estate in (“PRESIDENT, PARTNER, MANAGER, AGENT, ETC.”
the property described in the above notice; that I have read the said notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof, and that the facts stated therein are true and correct.

Date and Place (Signature of person signing on behalf of owner)) 225 PARK STREET • LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA 95453 • TELEPHONE (707) 263-5615 • FAX (707) 263-8584

CITY OF LAKEPORT
Over 125 years of community
pride, progress and service
6/10/2024
I hereby certify that the attached list of warrants has been audited, extensions are proper, purchase orders have been issued, and department heads have been given the opportunity to review and sign claim forms. ______________________________
Nicholas Walker
Finance Director
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 1 of 16
Bank Transaction Report
Lakeport Transaction Detail
Issued Date Range: 03/23/2024 - 06/06/2024
Cleared Date Range: -
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
Bank Account: 15-0352000798 - POOLED CASH BANK
03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005454 4LEAF, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,220.00 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005455 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -628.75 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005456 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -644.14 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005457 ANCHORAGE INN - LAKEPORT Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -179.98 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005458 APEX TECHNOLOGY MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,072.48 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005459 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -146.76 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005460 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -265.22 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005461 CLEAR LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,353.00 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005462 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -15,249.68 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005463 ENTERPRISE - EAN SERVICES, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -185.08 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005464 ESRI Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,080.00 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005465 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -455.80 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005466 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -973.67 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005467 GALL'S INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -18.14 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005468 GRAINGER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -224.48 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005469 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,167.95 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005470 HACH CHEMICAL COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,573.03 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005471 HIGH COUNTRY SECURITY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -279.00 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005472 IRVINE & JACHENS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -109.88 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005473 LEETE GENERATORS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,858.88 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005474 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -229.95 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005475 MENDO MILL & LUMBER CO. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,490.47 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005476 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -35.87 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005477 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,986.48 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005478 PAUL R. CURREN Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -8,917.19 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005479 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -33,994.78 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005480 RB PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,800.00 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005481 REUSER, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -380.10 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005482 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,335.86 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005483 SHIELDS, HARPER & CO. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -353.44 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005484 SONOMA RSA, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -15,724.12 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005485 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -60.62 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005486 TEAM VIEWER GERMANY GmbH Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -5,401.52 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005487 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -18,269.45 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005488 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -619.43 03/25/2024 03/31/2024 APA005489 WILDA SHOCK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,500.00 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 2 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/01/2024 04/30/2024 60103 NICOLAJ MURRAY Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared Check Reversal 176.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 60133 MARISSA MUNIZ ONATE Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared Check Reversal 36.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 60134 NICHOLAS STEWARD Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared Check Reversal 18.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005490 ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, LLC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,297.50 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005491 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -291.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005492 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -542.61 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005493 AmWINS GROUP BENEFITS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -25,252.15 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005494 APPLIED BUSINESS SOFTWARE, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -478.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005495 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -31.57 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005496 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -261.45 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005497 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -112.94 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005498 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -261.45 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005499 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -524.72 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005500 CANINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -140.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005501 CLEARLAKE LAVA, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -240.24 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005502 DAVIS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -40.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005503 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -262.85 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005504 DEPT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -169.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005505 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -160.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005506 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -320.28 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005507 FED EX Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -14.17 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005508 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -708.94 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005509 IMAGE SALES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -24.04 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005510 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -374.64 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005511 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -130.50 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005512 JACO HVAC & REFRIDGERATION Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,724.26 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005513 KELSEYVILLE TNT MINI STORAGE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -283.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005514 LAKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -850.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005515 LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -13.69 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005516 LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -324.79 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005517 LAKEPORT MAIN STREET ASSN. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,833.33 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005518 LENAHAN, SLATER, PEARSE & MAJERNIK, LLP Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -3,822.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005519 LEXIS NEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -30.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005520 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,683.47 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005521 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -316.22 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005522 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,500.00 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005523 MYERS STEVENS & TOOHEY & CO. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -386.10 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005524 NAPA AUTO - LAKE PARTS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,550.66 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005525 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,607.67 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005526 NUSO Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -283.34 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005527 OLDCASTLE PRECAST INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -856.63 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005528 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -55.03 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005529 PEOPLE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -200.00 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 3 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005530 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -24.64 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005531 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,067.09 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005532 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SVCS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -169.20 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005533 PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -133.21 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005534 PRECISION WIRELESS SERVICE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -9,046.99 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005535 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -78.90 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005536 REMIF Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -170.40 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005537 REMIF Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -103,300.44 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005538 RICOH - WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SVCS, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -807.14 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005539 RICOH USA, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -260.99 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005540 ROBERT NISHIYAMA Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -459.85 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005541 SHRED-IT USA LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -194.16 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005542 SWAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -137.38 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005543 THATCHER COMPANY OF CA., INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -10,177.79 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005544 TIRE HUB Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,643.93 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005545 TRI-CITIES ANSWERING SERVICE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -161.19 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005546 TRUIST GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -19,076.40 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005547 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -76.02 04/01/2024 04/30/2024 APA005548 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -7,337.96 04/03/2024 04/30/2024 APA005434 PACE ENGINEERING, INC. Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation Reversal 471.00 04/03/2024 04/30/2024 APA005448 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation Reversal 195.13 04/04/2024 04/30/2024 60288 AmWINS GROUP BENEFITS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared Check -25,767.50 04/04/2024 04/30/2024 60289 ANTHONY CASANOVA Accounts Payable Cleared Check -60.00 04/04/2024 04/30/2024 60290 JUAN ALTAMIRANO Accounts Payable Cleared Check -370.00 04/04/2024 04/30/2024 60291 NICK WALKER Accounts Payable Cleared Check -85.00 04/04/2024 04/30/2024 60292 RYAN COOLEY Accounts Payable Cleared Check -168.00 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60281 AFLAC Accounts Payable Cleared Check -703.40 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60282 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Accounts Payable Cleared Check -184.61 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60283 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Accounts Payable Cleared Check -50.00 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60284 LAKEPORT EMPLOYEE'S ASSOC Accounts Payable Cleared Check -345.00 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60285 LPOA Accounts Payable Cleared Check -755.00 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60286 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Accounts Payable Cleared Check -1,025.00 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 60287 VALIC - C/O JP MORGAN CHASE Accounts Payable Cleared Check -2,122.04 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003399 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,708.11 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003400 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,651.47 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003401 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,274.40 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003402 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,226.74 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003403 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,691.77 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003404 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -6,488.27 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003405 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -1,305.21 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003406 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,502.30 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003407 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -51.15 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003408 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -124.59 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 4 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003409 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -4,603.86 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003410 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,328.53 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003411 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -1,745.03 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003412 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -13,899.88 04/05/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003413 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -167.40 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005549 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -35.74 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005550 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -224.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005551 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -76.29 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005552 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -371.07 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005553 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -233.29 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005554 CIVICWELL Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,339.50 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005555 FED EX Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -5.45 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005556 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -23.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005557 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -463.90 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005558 JAMES DAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -55,209.13 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005559 KELSEYVILLE LUMBER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -300.94 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005560 LAKE CO OFFICE OF EDUCATION Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -50.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005561 LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,816.60 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005562 LEE'S SPORTING GOODS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -327.82 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005563 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,023.40 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005564 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -225.70 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005565 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -229.95 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005566 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -227.30 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005567 PERKINS SEPTIC TANK CLEANING Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -560.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005568 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -113.47 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005569 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -38,757.84 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005570 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -41.99 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005571 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -380.98 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005572 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -11.14 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005573 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -26.74 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005574 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -485.80 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005575 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -789.79 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005576 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -60.34 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005577 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -42.75 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005578 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -199.06 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005579 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -273.98 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005580 SIGNS OF RANDY HARE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -245.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005581 SLB BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -3,850.00 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005582 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -84.13 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005583 USA BLUE BOOK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -184.51 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005584 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,830.04 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005585 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,003.33 04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005586 WILDA SHOCK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,500.00 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 5 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/08/2024 04/30/2024 APA005587 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,865.43 04/15/2024 04/30/2024 60293 BUILDER SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared Check -24,793.58 04/15/2024 04/30/2024 60294 ISMAEL MEL OLEA Accounts Payable Cleared Check -65.20 04/15/2024 04/30/2024 60295 LAKEPORT DISPOSAL, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared Check -97,976.08 04/15/2024 04/30/2024 APA005481 REUSER, INC. Reversal Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation Reversal 380.10 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 60309 BRANDON DISNEY Accounts Payable Cleared Check -415.57 04/18/2024 05/31/2024 60310 KIM COSTA Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -692.62 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 60311 BRYAN CARLSON Accounts Payable Cleared Check -147.99 04/18/2024 05/31/2024 60312 CA BLDG STANDARDS COMMISSION Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -86.22 04/18/2024 05/31/2024 60313 CAL CPA Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -580.00 04/18/2024 05/31/2024 60314 DEPT OF CONSERVATION Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -485.83 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 60315 DIVISION OF STATE ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Cleared Check -16.80 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 60316 JUAN ALTAMIRANO Accounts Payable Cleared Check -655.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005588 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -550.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005589 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -70.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005590 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -174.89 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005591 AmWINS GROUP BENEFITS, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -25,252.15 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005592 APEX TECHNOLOGY MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,051.24 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005593 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -146.76 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005594 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -134.29 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005595 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -277.66 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005596 BADGER METER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,200.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005597 CALIF INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK AUTHORITY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,680.65 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005598 CLEAR LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,134.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005599 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -10,683.84 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005600 COMBS CONSULTING GROUP Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -250.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005601 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -3,975.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005602 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -262.85 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005603 DEPT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -70.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005604 DEPT OF WATER RESOURCES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -14,075.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005605 ENTERPRISE - EAN SERVICES, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -89.06 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005606 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -146.46 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005607 FED EX Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -9.70 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005608 FLOCK SAFETY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -25,493.15 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005609 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -852.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005610 GRAINGER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -221.86 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005611 ICE WATER DISTRIBUTORS INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -33.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005612 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -264.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005613 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -495.90 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005614 KELSEYVILLE TNT MINI STORAGE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -283.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005615 LAKE COUNTY BROADBAND SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -99.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005616 LEXIS NEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -30.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005617 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,688.62 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 6 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005618 MC ENGINEERING, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,840.30 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005619 NAPA AUTO - LAKE PARTS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,969.73 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005620 NUSO Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -260.23 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005621 ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -43.56 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005622 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -6,926.29 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005623 PAUL R. CURREN Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -12,190.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005624 PEOPLE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -200.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005625 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -23.82 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005626 POLESTAR COMPUTERS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -8,256.03 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005627 PRENTICE LONG, PC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -181.50 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005628 R3 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -852.50 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005629 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -37.53 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005630 REMIF Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -176.08 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005631 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -826.91 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005632 SKILES & ASSOCIATES, INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -26,270.81 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005633 SOLJIT Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -528.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005634 STANDARD PRINTING COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -549.66 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005635 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -511.84 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005636 THE DOCK FACTORY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -102.52 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005637 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,513.65 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005638 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -6,017.50 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005639 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -12,486.45 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005640 US BANK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,091.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005641 US POSTMASTER - ARIZONA Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,195.69 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005642 USA BLUE BOOK Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -701.17 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005643 VALLEY TOXICOLOGY SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -255.00 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005644 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,803.80 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005645 VISIT LAKE COUNTY CALIFORNIA Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -5,638.79 04/18/2024 04/30/2024 APA005646 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,661.10 04/19/2024 05/31/2024 60296 AFLAC Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -745.68 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 60297 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Accounts Payable Cleared Check -184.61 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 60298 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Accounts Payable Cleared Check -50.00 04/19/2024 05/31/2024 60299 LAKEPORT EMPLOYEE'S ASSOC Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -360.00 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 60300 LEGALSHIELD Accounts Payable Cleared Check -345.25 04/19/2024 60301 LPOA Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -755.00 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 60302 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Accounts Payable Cleared Check -1,025.00 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 60303 VALIC - C/O JP MORGAN CHASE Accounts Payable Cleared Check -2,122.04 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003415 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,784.96 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003416 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,727.12 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003417 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,354.03 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003418 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,305.66 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003419 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,750.66 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003420 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -6,591.76 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 7 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003421 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -1,293.06 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003422 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -3,469.70 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003423 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -51.15 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003424 CALPERS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -124.59 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003425 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -4,606.56 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003426 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -5,343.60 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003427 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -1,741.54 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003428 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -13,986.29 04/19/2024 04/30/2024 DFT0003429 IRS Accounts Payable Cleared Bank Draft -244.52 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005647 4LEAF, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,310.00 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005648 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -70.00 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005649 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -181.41 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005650 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -3,353.07 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005651 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -31.57 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005652 AT&T Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -112.94 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005653 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -524.72 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005654 B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,332.74 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005655 CAPITAL ONE TRADE CREDIT Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -326.24 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005656 CARLOS D.C. ELECTRIC REPAIR Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -221.63 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005657 CIVICWELL Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,462.00 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005658 CLEARLAKE REDI-MIX INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,282.16 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005659 CONSER LAND SURVEYING Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -873.75 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005660 DAVIS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,298.40 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005661 ENTERRA ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,065.15 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005662 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -24.47 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005663 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -454.28 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005664 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,892.98 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005665 GROW WEST Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,892.52 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005666 JONAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,060.68 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005667 LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -55.28 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005668 LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -4,118.40 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005669 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,217.75 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005670 MENDO MILL & LUMBER CO. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -2,042.19 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005671 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -250.60 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005672 PG&E Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -32,285.37 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005673 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -35.44 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005674 PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -30.38 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005675 REMIF Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -108,568.96 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005676 RICOH - WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SVCS, LLC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -315.91 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005677 RICOH USA, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -323.33 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005678 ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEPORT Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -265.00 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005679 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -970.05 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005680 STANDARD PRINTING COMPANY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -560.71 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 8 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005681 TRI-CITIES ANSWERING SERVICE Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -266.01 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005682 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -40.20 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005683 UCC RENTALS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,250.00 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005684 URBAN TREE FARM NURSERY Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -273.42 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005685 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -504,614.66 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005686 US POSTMASTER - ARIZONA Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,195.87 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005687 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -21,429.91 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005688 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -38.01 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005689 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -1,697.20 04/29/2024 04/30/2024 APA005690 WMH CORPORATION Accounts Payable Cleared AP Automation -158,572.56 04/30/2024 05/31/2024 60317 AFLAC Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -745.68 04/30/2024 60318 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -184.61 04/30/2024 05/31/2024 60319 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -50.00 04/30/2024 05/31/2024 60320 LAKEPORT EMPLOYEE'S ASSOC Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -360.00 04/30/2024 60321 LPOA Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -755.00 04/30/2024 05/31/2024 60322 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -1,025.00 04/30/2024 05/31/2024 60323 VALIC - C/O JP MORGAN CHASE Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -2,122.04 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 60325 DALE STOEBE Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -44.40 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 60326 TIRE HUB Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -64.06 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005691 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -666.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005692 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -714.52 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005693 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -282.04 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005694 DAVIS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,877.28 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005695 GOLDEN GATE K9, LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,200.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005696 IMAGE SALES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -26.21 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005697 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -150.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005698 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -462.19 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005699 L. N. CURTIS & SONS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,267.65 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005700 LAKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -50.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005701 LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -55.28 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005702 LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,902.61 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005703 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS (Cloverdale) Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,381.59 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005704 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -316.04 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005705 NIAGARA MACHINE, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11,385.89 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005706 OCCU-MED, LTD. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -295.90 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005707 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -7.17 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005708 PERFORMA LABS, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,265.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005709 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11.16 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005710 PITNEY BOWES INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -88.09 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005711 PRECISION WIRELESS SERVICE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11,353.89 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005712 QUALITY PACKAGING SUPPLY CORPORATION Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -226.45 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005713 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -46.32 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005714 REUSER, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -380.10 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 9 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005715 RICOH - WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SVCS, LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -491.23 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005716 SHRED-IT USA LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -293.43 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005717 SONOMA RSA, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -21,218.75 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005718 SUTTER LAKESIDE HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -50.00 05/02/2024 05/31/2024 APA005719 VALLEY TOXICOLOGY SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -170.00 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003431 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,721.79 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003432 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,664.95 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003433 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,363.21 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003434 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,314.75 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003435 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,703.07 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003436 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -6,508.11 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003437 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -1,300.96 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003438 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,490.90 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003439 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -51.15 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003440 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -124.59 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003441 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -4,526.34 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003442 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,048.31 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003443 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -1,715.22 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003444 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -13,445.27 05/03/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003445 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -148.80 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60327 ANDREW WELTER Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -54.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60328 LAKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -25.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60329 NICHOLAS STEWARD Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -54.00 05/13/2024 60330 NICOLAJ MURRAY Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -176.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60331 OLIVIA GRUPP Reversal Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check Reversal 734.83 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60331 OLIVIA GRUPP Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -734.83 05/13/2024 60332 PAUL HARRIS Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -67.00 05/13/2024 60333 SHAUN JOHNSON Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -36.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 60334 VICTOR RICO Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -38.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005720 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -567.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005721 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -332.53 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005722 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -224.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005723 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -251.45 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005724 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -251.45 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005725 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -132.91 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005726 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -87.15 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005727 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -368.81 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005728 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -230.85 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005729 BOB HALL AND ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -8,000.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005730 CARLTON COOPER TIRES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -130.40 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005731 CLEARLAKE LAVA, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -260.62 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005732 CODE PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -122.50 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005733 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11,069.83 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 10 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005734 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,225.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005735 COUNTY OF LAKE-SPECIAL DIST Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -90,294.42 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005736 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -262.85 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005737 EDD Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,350.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005738 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -141.06 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005739 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -275.81 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005740 GARTON TRACTOR Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -142.41 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005741 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -393.40 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005742 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -65.23 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005743 KELSEYVILLE LUMBER Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -272.35 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005744 LEXIS NEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -30.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005745 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -229.95 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005746 MYERS STEVENS & TOOHEY & CO. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -386.10 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005747 NICK BARBIERI TRUCKING, LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,954.34 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005748 NUSO Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -259.93 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005749 ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -32.67 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005750 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,670.43 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005751 PEOPLE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -200.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005752 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -475.07 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005753 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11.90 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005754 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -81.51 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005755 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -46.08 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005756 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -7.83 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005757 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -485.82 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005758 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,045.19 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005759 PITNEY BOWES INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -198.56 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005760 PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -60.43 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005761 POLESTAR COMPUTERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -10,823.61 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005762 R.S. HUGHES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -141.80 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005763 R3 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -4,570.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005764 RICOH - WELLS FARGO VENDOR FIN SVCS, LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -315.91 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005765 ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE CENTER Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -84.95 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005766 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,111.53 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005767 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,818.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005768 THATCHER COMPANY OF CA., INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -27,768.03 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005769 TIRE HUB Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -494.12 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005770 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,712.67 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005771 UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -669.14 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005772 USA BLUE BOOK Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -231.87 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005773 VALLEY TOXICOLOGY SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -85.00 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005774 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,808.98 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005775 VESTIS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -73.38 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005776 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,205.58 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 11 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005777 WHITE CAP, L.P. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -530.05 05/13/2024 05/31/2024 APA005778 WILDA SHOCK Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,515.00 05/15/2024 05/31/2024 60343 LAKEPORT DISPOSAL, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -108,629.94 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005779 ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, LLC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -8,397.90 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005780 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,866.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005781 APEX TECHNOLOGY MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,051.24 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005782 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,354.75 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005783 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -524.72 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005784 COUNTY OF LAKE - INFO TECH Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,650.25 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005785 ENGIE SERVICES U.S.. INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,608.20 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005786 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -166.39 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005787 FERRELLGAS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -43.63 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005788 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -4,962.03 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005789 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -228.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005790 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -36.96 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005791 JONAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -149.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005792 KELSEYVILLE TNT MINI STORAGE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -323.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005793 LAKE COUNTY RECORD BEE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -174.77 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005794 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3.76 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005795 NAPA AUTO - LAKE PARTS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,631.76 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005796 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -195.21 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005797 PAUL R. CURREN Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -17,284.75 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005798 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -803.14 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005799 PRENTICE LONG, PC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -115.50 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005800 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -139.41 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005801 RICOH USA, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -97.49 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005802 ROY IVERSON Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -112.47 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005803 ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE CENTER Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -20.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005804 SHRED-IT USA LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -195.62 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005805 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -56.84 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005806 SUTTER LAKESIDE HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -25.00 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005807 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,412.77 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005808 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -11,301.83 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005809 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -29,325.14 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005810 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -38.01 05/16/2024 05/31/2024 APA005811 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -4,852.37 05/17/2024 60335 AFLAC Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -745.68 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60336 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -184.61 05/17/2024 60337 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -50.00 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60338 LAKEPORT EMPLOYEE'S ASSOC Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -375.00 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60339 LEGALSHIELD Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -345.25 05/17/2024 60340 LPOA Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -755.00 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60341 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -1,025.00 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 12 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60342 VALIC - C/O JP MORGAN CHASE Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -2,122.04 05/17/2024 60344 COUNTY OF LAKE-HEALTH SVCS Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -451.00 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60345 ERIC MACNAB Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -893.77 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60346 JUAN ALTAMIRANO Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -640.00 05/17/2024 60347 KEVIN M. INGRAM Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -28.82 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 60348 SWRCB Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -110.00 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003446 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,721.79 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003447 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,664.94 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003448 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,400.35 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003449 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,351.57 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003450 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,703.07 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003451 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -6,508.12 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003452 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -1,308.87 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003453 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -3,512.11 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003454 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -52.08 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003455 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -124.59 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003456 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -4,721.28 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003457 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,429.50 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003458 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -1,785.08 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003459 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -14,169.99 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003460 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -263.12 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003461 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -102.68 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003462 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -101.75 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003463 CALPERS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -0.93 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003464 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -38.46 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003465 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -7.47 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003466 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -14.57 05/17/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003467 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -70.50 05/23/2024 05/31/2024 60353 CRISS TREE CARE Accounts Payable Pending Clear Check -35,000.00 05/28/2024 60354 CONLEY CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -40.00 05/28/2024 60355 JONATAN MORENO Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -134.00 05/28/2024 60356 MARISSA MUNIZ ONATE Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -134.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005812 4LEAF, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,320.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005813 ADAMS ASHBY GROUP, LLC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,886.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005814 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,137.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005815 AQUA PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -36.98 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005816 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -261.45 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005817 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -31.59 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005818 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -113.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005819 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -261.45 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005820 AT&T Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -224.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005821 ATD TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT LLC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,467.98 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005822 BOB HALL AND ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -9,100.00 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 13 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005823 CARLOS D.C. ELECTRIC REPAIR Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -221.63 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005824 CLEAR LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,814.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005825 CLEARLAKE REDI-MIX INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,003.60 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005826 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -3,047.23 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005827 DEPT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -35.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005828 DOKKEN ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -16,240.37 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005829 GASLIGHT GRILL Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,141.63 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005830 GOVINVEST INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -19,000.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005831 HACH CHEMICAL COMPANY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -315.38 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005832 IMAGE SALES, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -24.04 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005833 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -169.37 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005834 LAKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,500.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005835 LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -109.38 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005836 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES- REDWOOD EMPIRE DIVISION Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -275.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005837 LENAHAN, SLATER, PEARSE & MAJERNIK, LLP Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -2,925.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005838 MC ENGINEERING, INC Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -570.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005839 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -316.04 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005840 MENDO MILL & LUMBER CO. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,754.16 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005841 OCCU-MED, LTD. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -295.90 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005842 PACE ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -538.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005843 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -4,378.33 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005844 PG&E Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -27,360.70 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005845 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SVCS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -169.20 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005846 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -235.53 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005847 RB PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -140.00 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005848 REMIF Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -176.08 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005849 REMIF Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -104,726.32 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005850 RICOH USA, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -152.42 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005851 THE UPS STORE #5161 Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -14.37 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005852 THOMAS & ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,392.58 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005853 TRI-CITIES ANSWERING SERVICE Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -381.64 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005854 UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,155.53 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005855 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -1,411.39 05/28/2024 05/31/2024 APA005856 VESTIS Accounts Payable Pending Clear AP Automation -73.38 05/31/2024 60357 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -184.61 05/31/2024 60358 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -50.00 05/31/2024 60359 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -1,025.00 05/31/2024 60360 VALIC - C/O JP MORGAN CHASE Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -2,025.00 05/31/2024 60361 CHRIS PION Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -67.00 05/31/2024 APA005857 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -70.00 05/31/2024 APA005858 APEX TECHNOLOGY MGMT, INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -123.75 05/31/2024 APA005859 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -133.17 05/31/2024 APA005860 CITY OF CLEARLAKE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -14,214.26 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 14 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/31/2024 APA005861 CODE PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -830.00 05/31/2024 APA005862 CONSER LAND SURVEYING Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -900.00 05/31/2024 APA005863 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,071.86 05/31/2024 APA005864 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -195.00 05/31/2024 APA005865 ELEVATE WIRELESS CORP Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -6,584.63 05/31/2024 APA005866 EUREKA OXYGEN COMPANY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -326.36 05/31/2024 APA005867 FED EX Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -10.52 05/31/2024 APA005868 FINISHLINE SIGNS Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -619.24 05/31/2024 APA005869 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -806.95 05/31/2024 APA005870 HILLSIDE POWERSPORTS MARINE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -779.08 05/31/2024 APA005871 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -150.00 05/31/2024 APA005872 IT'S ABOUT TIME, INC Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -10.88 05/31/2024 APA005873 LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,806.97 05/31/2024 APA005874 MC ENGINEERING, INC Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -4,621.16 05/31/2024 APA005875 MEDIACOM Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -229.95 05/31/2024 APA005876 NHA ADVISORS Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,806.25 05/31/2024 APA005877 PACE SUPPLY #03391-00 Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -3,679.90 05/31/2024 APA005878 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -479.79 05/31/2024 APA005879 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -3,773.67 05/31/2024 APA005880 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -11.19 05/31/2024 APA005881 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -69.49 05/31/2024 APA005882 PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -22.79 05/31/2024 APA005883 PRECISION WIRELESS SERVICE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -4,205.63 05/31/2024 APA005884 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -126.52 05/31/2024 APA005885 RB PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -330.00 05/31/2024 APA005886 RICOH USA, INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -491.23 05/31/2024 APA005887 SONOMA RSA, INC Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -8,600.00 05/31/2024 APA005888 STANDARD PRINTING COMPANY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -557.32 05/31/2024 APA005889 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -735.21 05/31/2024 APA005890 THATCHER COMPANY OF CA., INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -6,538.89 05/31/2024 APA005891 UNIVAR USA INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -5,459.94 05/31/2024 APA005892 US POSTMASTER - ARIZONA Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,188.83 05/31/2024 DFT0003468 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -3,729.83 05/31/2024 DFT0003469 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -3,672.87 05/31/2024 DFT0003470 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -5,492.55 05/31/2024 DFT0003471 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -5,442.92 05/31/2024 DFT0003472 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -3,703.07 05/31/2024 DFT0003473 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -6,508.13 05/31/2024 DFT0003474 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -1,293.06 05/31/2024 DFT0003475 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -3,469.70 05/31/2024 DFT0003476 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -51.15 05/31/2024 DFT0003477 CALPERS Accounts Payable Outstanding Bank Draft -124.59 05/31/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003478 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -5,046.92 Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 15 of 16
Cleared
Date Number Description Module Status Type Amount
Issued
Date
05/31/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003479 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -6,387.12 05/31/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003480 CA EMP DEVELOPMENT DEPT Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -1,913.09 05/31/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003481 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -16,481.53 05/31/2024 05/31/2024 DFT0003482 IRS Accounts Payable Pending Clear Bank Draft -186.00 06/03/2024 60362 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Outstanding Check -27,287.67 06/04/2024 58253 PAUL R. CURREN Reversal Accounts Payable Outstanding Check Reversal 4,740.44 06/04/2024 59053 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Reversal Accounts Payable Outstanding Check Reversal 519.00 06/06/2024 APA005893 ACME RIGGING & SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -349.48 06/06/2024 APA005894 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -819.15 06/06/2024 APA005895 AT&T CALNET3 Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -283.67 06/06/2024 APA005896 CIVICWELL Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -17,785.99 06/06/2024 APA005897 DAVIS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,079.59 06/06/2024 APA005898 ENGIE SERVICES U.S.. INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -16,180.32 06/06/2024 APA005899 HIGH COUNTRY SECURITY Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -165.00 06/06/2024 APA005900 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INFO TECH, DBA LEFTA Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -3,702.85 06/06/2024 APA005901 IRONEDGE GROUP Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -114.00 06/06/2024 APA005902 KIWANIS CLUB OF LAKEPORT Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -250.00 06/06/2024 APA005903 LAKE COUNTY BROADBAND SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -99.00 06/06/2024 APA005904 LAKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -25.00 06/06/2024 APA005905 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -3.76 06/06/2024 APA005906 MANAGEMENT CONNECTIONS Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,002.33 06/06/2024 APA005907 PEOPLE SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -200.00 06/06/2024 APA005908 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -608.83 06/06/2024 APA005909 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -308.71 06/06/2024 APA005910 PG&E Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -392.80 06/06/2024 APA005911 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -420.99 06/06/2024 APA005912 PLAZA PAINT & SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -200.95 06/06/2024 APA005913 PRECISION WIRELESS SERVICE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -4,205.63 06/06/2024 APA005914 SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -66.50 06/06/2024 APA005915 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -619.15 06/06/2024 APA005916 VISIT LAKE COUNTY CALIFORNIA Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -6,205.50 06/06/2024 APA005917 WESTGATE PETROLEUM CO., INC. Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -5,262.90 06/06/2024 APA005918 WILDA SHOCK Accounts Payable Outstanding AP Automation -1,500.00 Bank Account 15-0352000798 Total: (628) -2,832,768.53
Report Total: (628) -2,832,768.53
Bank Transaction Report Issued Date Range: -
6/10/2024 11:26:10 AM Page 16 of 16
Summary
Bank Account Count Amount
15-0352000798 POOLED CASH BANK 628 -2,832,768.53
Report Total: 628 -2,832,768.53
Cash Account Count Amount
998 998-0000-101000 POOLED CASH - WEST AMERICA 628 -2,832,768.53 Report Total: 628 -2,832,768.53
Transaction Type Count Amount
AP Automation 465 -2,188,235.32
AP Automation Reversal 3 1,046.23
Bank Draft 82 -299,826.68
Check 72 -351,977.03
Check Reversal 6 6,224.27
Report Total: 628 -2,832,768.53
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # IV.F.

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Development Agency
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport

STAFF REPORT
RE: Contract Amendment for the Hartley St. Culvert Repair Project ER-40A0(047)
MEETING DATE: June 18, 2024
SUBMITTED BY: Ron Ladd, Public Works Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering for additional right-of-way services for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

After the flooding in 2019, the City received federal funding through the Emergency Relief program to repair two areas damaged by the storms. The first project consists of replacing a headwall on the east side of Main Street at Forbes Creek (Forbes Creek Headwall Repair Project). The second project consists of replacing a culvert and headwall on Hartley Street, north of the Anastasia Drive intersection (Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project). The subject of this requested amendment is the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project.

City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering on January 18, 2022 for environmental and right of way services for a not-to-exceed amount of $97,737.49. City staff and Dokken Engineering have diligently worked together through the federal and state requirements for environmental review, studies, and reporting requirements. During this phase, the state determined a Location Hydraulic Study was required to fulfill the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This study was not included in Dokken’s original scope, therefore Amendment 1 was issued for $20,002.30 to complete the Location Hydraulic Study.

City staff determined the City Engineer would complete the design phase of this project with coordination from Dokken Engineering. Amendment 2 was issued for Dokken to support the City Engineer with field survey data and Computer Aided Design (CAD) support for the project plans. Amendment 2 was issued for an additional $10,344.41.

Finally, the subject of this request is Amendment 3. Initially, the project was estimated to only affect one parcel requiring right of way. Temporary construction easements (TCE) and permanent maintenance easements both fall under the definition of right of way. Through the design process, an additional need for right of way was identified for the construction of the project. Due to the federal funding, any right of way acquisition, including TCE, must follow the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as amended in 1987 (Uniform Act) as well as comply with all requirements of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Due to these requirements, the specialized support services costs are much higher than the actual costs of the Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # IV.F.
real property rights. Amendment 3 will cover the additional support needed from Dokken Engineering to properly acquire the additional right of way for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project.

Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign Amendment 3 to the PSA with Dokken Engineering for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project.

OPTIONS:

1. Authorize City Manager to sign Amendment 3 to the PSA for Dokken Engineering for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project.

2. Provide other direction.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $21,635.74 Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:

Comments: FHWA ER funding is provided at an 88.53% reimbursement ratio, leaving a match of 11.47% to be covered by local funds. The total federal funding allocated for preliminary engineering is $75,076 and $62,315.77 for right of way. With the reimbursement ratio applied to the total anticipated federal funding, this leaves $15,759.61 to be covered by local funds for this project at this time.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☒ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☒ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☐ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☐ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dokken Engineering for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project in the amount of $21,635.74.

Attachments: 1. Hartley Street Culvert Repair –Amendment 3- Scope of Services & Fee Schedule

2. Hartley Street Culvert Repair – Location Map

CORPORATE OFFICE: 110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 | Phone: (916) 858-0642 | Fax: (916) 858-0643 www.dokkenengineering.com
October 31, 2023
Olivia Grupp
Project Manager
City of Lakeport
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
RE: Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project: Amendment 3 Additional Services Dear Ms. Grupp:

Dokken Engineering (Dokken) is pleased to submit this scope and fee to provide additional services required for the Hartley Street Culvert Repair Project (Project). The City of Lakeport (City) requested assistance with these tasks which are outlined below.

3.4 Survey
Original scope included one (1) parcel that required a plat and legal. The current design will include a second parcel that will require permanent rights so (1) additional plat and legal will be required.

4.3 Obtain Title Report/Title Research
Dokken Engineering will obtain one (1) title report for the affected parcel. The Dokken Engineering right of way team will perform all necessary research for the parcel being acquired. Agents may resolve or oversee resolution of problems relating to unusual circumstances with regard to title or ownership and uncover any flaws, noting any exceptions pertaining to property such as mortgage liens, restrictions, easements and rights of way.

4.4 Waiver Valuation in Lieu of Appraisal Report
In insignificant valuation situations an appraisal may be waived [49 CFR 24.102(c) (2)].

Dokken’s right of way team has experience in doing waiver valuations on numerous projects, and this allows the budget and schedule to remain on track for projects with accelerated timelines. Waiver Valuations follow Caltrans and Uniform Act guidelines. One (1) wavier valuation will be completed. A Notice of intent to inspect letter along with the acquisition policy brochure and Title IV information will be provided to impacted property owners.

4.5 Negotiations
Dokken will complete one (1) acquisition. All “Good Faith Negotiations” will be completed by Dokken Engineering’s Right of Way Team. After completion of the waiver valuation process and just compensation determination, Dokken Engineering will prepare the offer package and meet with all owners in person to present and explain the offer package details. The offer package will include the offer letter, written summary of just compensation with supporting waiver valuation information, property owner exhibit showing property map with right of way take locations, Title VI information, “Your CORPORATE OFFICE: 110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 | Phone: (916) 858-0642 | Fax: (916) 858-0643 www.dokkenengineering.com
Property – Your Transportation Project” booklet. Dokken Engineering will negotiate with the property owner to arrive at a mutually agreeable settlement and prepare necessary purchase agreements such as Grant Deeds, Easement Deeds, and Temporary Construction Easement Deeds. Dokken Engineering will obtain receipt of delivery of offer and/or present and secure tenant information statements, as applicable, during the initial meeting.

Dokken Engineering will work closely with the Client to aid in the recommendation of the appropriate course of action with regard to the various acquisitions with property owners requesting additional compensation and/or services beyond the initial offer package.

Recommended settlement packages with justifications and impasse letters will be provided to the Client for review. Working with the property owners to agreeable terms will be Dokken Engineering’s focus.

Additionally, Dokken Engineering will attend, at the request of the Client, any Public Community Meetings regarding the project.

Dokken Engineering’s Right of Way Agents hold California Real Estate Salesperson’s Licenses and are working under the direct supervision of a California Real Estate Licensed Broker.

4.6 Escrow Coordination
Upon reaching an agreement on the terms and conditions of the acquisition with the property owner, Dokken will be available to assist the Client in opening escrow. Dokken will supply fully executed agreements along with other supporting information to escrow in order to close each transaction. Dokken will work closely with the Client to assist in the timely closing of all transactions. For the convenience of the property owner, our right of way team has a California Notary who will be available to notarize any documentation that is required. Fully executed deeds and easements will be delivered to the Client for acceptance prior to recording. In the event escrow services are not required, Dokken is available to perform these services and record the required documentation.

4.7 Right of Way Certification/Project Close Out
Dokken will coordinate with the Client and supply all required documentation for the right of way certification. Dokken Engineering will review all acquisition documents for proper and complete execution, including formal acceptance. The original acquisition file for each affected parcel will be provided to the City upon completion of the project. Each acquisition file will contain property information, diary report, written correspondence, just compensation documentation, waiver, offer package, negotiations, title documentation, copies of recorded documents, and all applicable documentation.

Total Cost: $21,635.74
We appreciate the opportunity to further assist the City in delivering this Project. If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 847-4554.

Sincerely,

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Jamie Formico, SR/WA, R/W- NAC, R/W-RAC
Right of Way Lead

Proclamation OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT RECOGNIZING ANDREW BRITTON FOR HIS 35 YEARS OF

SERVICE TO THE CITY AND COMMUNITY OF LAKEPORT UPON

HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Andrew Britton has dedicated 35 years of exemplary service to the City of Lakeport; and WHEREAS, Andrew Britton has consistently demonstrated professionalism, dedication, and an unwavering commitment to the betterment of our community; and WHEREAS, Andrew Britton began their career with the City of Lakeport on October 1, 1989, shortly after graduating from the University of California at Santa Cruz with a B.A. in Environmental Studies. During his career at the City, he served in various capacities including as the Planning Services Manager and Compliance Officer, and has been an integral part of both the Community Development Department and the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, throughout their career, Andrew Britton has been recognized for their exceptional work ethic; and
WHEREAS, Andrew Britton has made significant contributions to numerous projects and initiatives that have greatly benefited the residents of the City of Lakeport, including the Bella Vista Apartments, multiple General Plan Updates and the City’s Semi-Annual Community Clean-Up Days, as well as his work in Social Media during declared emergencies and as a member of the City’s Communication Team; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lakeport acknowledges the sacrifices and efforts made by Andrew Britton which have contributed to the overall success and improved quality of life within our community; and
WHEREAS, Andrew Britton will be retiring on July 3, 2024, leaving behind a legacy of dedication, hard work, and community service.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Lakeport does hereby thankfully and gratefully extend our most sincere best wishes to Andrew Britton
On the occasion of his retirement and recognize him for years of service to the City of Lakeport. _________________________________
Michael Froio, Mayor
_________________________________
Kim Costa, Mayor Pro Tem
_________________________________
Stacey Mattina, Council Member
_________________________________
Kenneth Parlet, II, Council Member
_________________________________
Brandon Disney, Council Member
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item #VII.A.1.

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Development Agency
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport

STAFF REPORT
RE: Placement of Historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in Xabatin Park
MEETING DATE: 6/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Ron Ladd, Public Works Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The purpose of this staff report is to provide information and seek approval for the placement of the historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in Xabatin Park.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Over the past year, the Public Works Department has collaborated closely with the Lakeport Rotary Club to facilitate the placement of the historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in the newly finished Xabatin Park. The Rotary Club has generously agreed to fund the construction of a concrete pad and the installation of two benches at the designated location within the park.

Historical Significance
The Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell is a treasured piece of local history dating back to the early 1900s. It rang every night at 10 p.m. to alert children that it was time to return home. This bell is a symbol of the community's past and a testament to Lakeport's rich heritage. Preserving and displaying the bell in Xabatin Park will allow current and future generations to connect with a tangible piece of the City’s history.

Project Details
• Location: The bell will be placed in a prominent location within Xabatin Park, as indicated in the attached diagram.
• Construction: The Rotary Club will cover the costs associated with building a concrete pad and installing two benches around the bell.
• Support: Attached to this report is a letter of support from John Parker, Ph.D., the President and Curator of the Lake County Historical Society, endorsing the project and emphasizing the bell's historical importance.

OPTIONS:

1. Approve the placement of the historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in Xabatin Park and acknowledge the generous contribution of the Lakeport Rotary Club for funding the construction of the concrete pad and benches.

2. Provide Staff Alternative Direction
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item #VII.A.1.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $ Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☐ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☐ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to approve the placement of the historic Lakeport Curfew/Hooligan Bell in Xabatin Park, as outlined in the staff report. Additionally, move to acknowledge and thank the Lakeport Rotary Club for their generous contribution.

Attachments: 1. Diagram of the proposed location for the bell in Xabatin Park.

2. Letter of support from John Parker, Ph.D., President and Curator of the Lake County Historical Society.

From the office of the President
Lake County Historical Society
PO Box 1011
Lakeport, CA 95453
IRS #946128982

PRESERVING AND INTERPRETING THE PAST

FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE FUTURE
Pam Harpster (President Elect) February 22, 2024
Rotary Club of Lakeport
PO Box 937
Lakeport, CA 95453
Dear Mrs. Harpster,
The Lake County Historical Society
would like to express its support for
the Lakeport Rotary's plan to restore
the Curfew Bell (Hooligan Bell) as a
fixture in the XaBaTin Community
Park in Lakeport.

This colorful piece of Lakeport's
history was erected as an answer to
the age-old problem of overly energetic
kids out in the evening.

It's ringing every evening at 10:00 pm
was their signal to return home.

The Historical Society is excited to see
this landmark restored to the Clear
Lake waterfront as a reminder of our
shared historical past and as an
educational benefit for the future.

Sincerely,
John Parker Ph.D.

President and Curator
Hooligan Bell at the NW corner of
Courthouse Square (date unknown)
Hooligan Bell (photo taken
during 1909 flood)
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.A.2.
362591.1

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council ☒
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District ☐
Lakeport Industrial Development Authority ☐
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport ☐

STAFF REPORT
RE: Adoption of the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
MEETING DATE: 06/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Ron Ladd, Public Works Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: ☐Information only ☐ Discussion ☒Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to approve a resolution adopting the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project is a critical infrastructure initiative aimed at addressing capacity and safety concerns along Lakeport Boulevard at the SR-29 northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) ramp intersections, including Bevins Road on the east. The City proposes to construct a sixlegged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard, Bevins Road, and the SR-29 NB ramps, as well as a second four-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and the SR-29 SB ramps.

The primary purpose of the proposed project is to maximize the existing infrastructure to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. The secondary purpose is to improve operations, reduce delay, and enhance mobility for all travel modes at the interchange.

The project involves the construction of two modern, yield-controlled, single-lane roundabouts designed to accommodate the Ultimate Design Year traffic forecast volumes. The project is located within the Lakeport city limits and approximately 0.6 miles west of Clear Lake, between post miles R41.2 and R41.6 on SR-29.

In October 2022, the City Council approved the contract with WMH for the engineering services required to prepare the PSR-PDS.

A Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) was prepared as part of the study to provide a technical foundation for the project. The key findings include:
• Existing conditions indicate significant delays and other traffic flow concerns. • The proposed roundabouts will improve traffic flow and safety, reducing rear-end and hit-object collisions.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # VII.A.2.
362591.1
The project will address several deficiencies, including the lack of bicycle facilities, sidewalks, curb ramps, and marked crosswalks in the study area.

Funding will be sought from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Active Transportation Program (ATP), the federal RAISE program, local funds, or alternative sources. The project milestones are as follows:
• Program Project: October 2024
• Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase: March 2025
• Finalize PA&ED Phase / Begin Design: June 2026
• Final Design / Ready to List: December 2027
• Begin Construction: April 2028
• Complete Construction: December 2030
Potential risks include schedule delays and budget increases due to adjacent project consistency, revised hydromodification requirements, funding availability, right-of-way negotiations, and environmental factors.

Coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for water quality certification and other relevant agencies will be required.

The findings and recommendations of this study will serve as a critical nexus for the establishment of future development fees within the corridor. By adopting the PSR-PDS, the City will have a robust technical basis to support the imposition of development impact fees, ensuring that new developments contribute fairly to the infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate growth in the area.

The adoption of the PSR-PDS is a crucial step in advancing the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project, which will enhance traffic safety and efficiency in the Lakeport area. Approval of this report will enable the City to seek funding and proceed with the environmental and design phases.

OPTIONS:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the PSR-PDS for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project.

2. Do not approve the resolution.

3. Offer recommended changes to the PSR-PDS.

4. Provide alternative direction to staff.

FISCAL IMPACT:
☒ None ☐ $ Budgeted Item? ☐Yes ☐ No
Budget Adjustment Needed? ☐Yes ☐ No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): ☐ General Fund ☐ Water OM Fund ☐ Sewer OM Fund ☐ Other:

Comments:

While there is no direct fiscal impact to the adoption of the study, adoption with position the City future funding opportunities to redevelopment the primary gateway into the City of Lakeport.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 3 Agenda Item # VII.A.2.
362591.1
COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☐ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☒ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to adopt a resolution adopting the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project.
☒ Attachments: 1. 2024-06 Lakeport Council Update Slide Deck

2. Lakeport PSR-PDS

3. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lakeport Adopting the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SR 29 and Lakeport Blvd
Interchange Improvement ProjectCity of Lakeport
City Council UpdateJune 18, 2024
Agenda
Project Overview / Project Initiation Document Approval • Project Purpose / Scope• Why Roundabouts?• Project Overview• Next Steps Initiate the Project to make it eligible for regional funding Project Purpose Improve Traffic
Safety
Relieve
Traffic
Congestion
Minimize
Delay
Improve
Pedestrian
and
Bicycle
Access
Enhance
Economic
Vitality
Set a base of necessary improvements to further
investigate impact fees in the future
Project Area
Scope of Improvements
l © 2023 GHD. All rights reserved.

Providing safety andaccess for all modes
Why Roundabouts?
• Improve Safety for ALL modes• Increase Traffic Capacity / Reduce Delay
• Environmental Benefits
Less Delay=
Less EmissionsLess Fuel ConsumptionNoise Reduction
• Landscaping / Gateway
Opportunities
• Support Growth without
Requiring Bridge Widening
• Less Costly to Operate
Modern Roundabout
Source: Roundabouts : An Informational Guide. FHWA
Roundabout Safety Overview Vehicle Conflict Points
Pedestrian
Conflict Points
Source: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 672 Exhibit 5-2 Source: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 672 Exhibit 5-7/8 Modern Roundabouts Design Elements
Shared
Use Path Truck
Apron
Landscape
Buffer
Pedestrian
Raised Central RefugeIsland
Splitter Island
Entry Deflection
Roundabout Alternative

DRAFT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE
Bicycle Mode Options

1. Experienced Riders travel as a vehicle2. Novice Riders use Shared Path3. Pedestrian Refuges are wide enough to shelter bicyclists

4. Enter and Exit Shared Path from bike
ramps located away from the intersection
Multi-Modal Path of Travel DRAFT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE
Next Steps
Thank You
ghd.co
m
Project Study Report-Project Development Support
(PSR-PDS)
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
March 25, 2024
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

Paul Curren Date
Engineer
APPROVED:

Kevin Ingram Date
City Manager
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 Vicinity Map
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 This project study report-project development support has been prepared under the direction of the following registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer attests to the technical information contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based.
03/25/24

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE
09/30/25
C50767
Sean Charles
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 Table of Contents

1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1

2. Background ......................................................................................................... 2

3. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 2

4. Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment ................................................. 2

5. Deficiencies .......................................................................................................... 5

6. Corridor and System Coordination .................................................................. 5

7. Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 6

8. Right-of-Way ....................................................................................................... 7

9. Stakeholder Involvement ................................................................................... 8

10. Environmental Compliance ............................................................................. 8

11. Funding ............................................................................................................ 11

12. Delivery Schedule ........................................................................................... 12

13. Risks ................................................................................................................. 12

14. External Agency Coordination ...................................................................... 12

15. Project Reviews ............................................................................................... 13

16. Project Personnel ............................................................................................ 13

17. Attachments .................................................................................................... 13 PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 1

1. INTRODUCTION
Project Description
The proposed project would address capacity and safety concerns along Lakeport Boulevard in Lake County (County) at the State Route 29 (SR-29) northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) ramp intersections, including Bevins Road on the east. These improvements are identified as the SR-29 and Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project (project). The City proposes to construct a six-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard, Bevins Road, and the SR-29 NB ramps, as well as a second four-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and the SR-29 SB ramps.

Project Location
The project is located in the western portion of Lake County, California, at approximately

39.033262 latitude and -122.923910 longitude, and on SR-29 between post miles R41.2 and R41.6. The project site is located within the Lakeport city limits and approximately 0.6 miles west of Clear Lake.

Project Setting
SR-29 in the project vicinity is a four-lane divided freeway between the Lakeport city limits to the south and approximately 2.4 miles south of the unincorporated community of Upper Lake to the north. Outside of these limits, SR-29 is a two-lane undivided roadway. As the primary roadway through the Napa Valley, SR-29 provides north-south access between the Bay Area and Lake County. Within the project area, SR-29 extends in a northwest-southeast direction, and consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction.

Lakeport Boulevard is a City-owned facility that acts as an east-west arterial road linking the town to the rest of the County and SR-29. In the vicinity of the project, Lakeport Boulevard consists of a two-lane roadway with striped medians and center left-turn lanes with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph).

Bevins Street, in the project vicinity, is a City-owned two-lane facility that runs in a northwestsoutheast direction and ends at a parking lot to the east of the interchange. A connection from Bevins Street to Kimberly Lane to the southeast is planned for the future, however is not part of this project.

The project is located in a small urban/rural setting, surrounded by open space land, agriculture, commercial properties, and residential neighborhoods.

The remaining capital outlay support, right-of-way, and construction components of the project are preliminary estimates and are not suitable for programming purposes. Either a project report or a supplemental PID following the format of a PSR will serve as the programming document for the remaining components of the project. A project report will serve as approval of the “selected” alternative.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 2

2. BACKGROUND
Existing Facility
The project is located in southern Lakeport. The SR 29/Lakeport Boulevard interchange is the southernmost access point to SR 29 in the city. There are agriculture, commercial, open space, and residential land uses surrounding the project area.

SR 29 in the project vicinity is a four-lane divided freeway between the Lakeport city limits to the south and approximately 2.4 miles south of the unincorporated community of Upper Lake to the north. Outside of these limits, SR 29 is a two-lane undivided roadway. As the primary roadway through the Napa Valley, SR 29 provides north-south access between the Bay Area and Lake County. Within the project area, SR 29 extends in a northwest-southeast direction and consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction.

Lakeport Boulevard is a roadway that acts as an east-west arterial road linking the city to the rest of the County and SR 29. In the vicinity of the project, Lakeport Boulevard consists of a two-lane roadway with striped medians and center left-turn lanes with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph).

Bevins Street, in the project vicinity, is a two-lane roadway that runs in a northwest-southeast direction and ends at a parking lot to the east of the interchange, where a courthouse will be constructed in the future. A connection from Bevins Street to Kimberly Lane to the southeast is planned for the future, however, is not part of this project.

3. PURPOSE AND NEED
Purpose
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to maximize the existing infrastructure to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. The secondary purpose of this project is to improve operations, reduce delay, and enhance mobility for all travel modes at the interchange.

Need
There is a history of rear end, broadside, hit-object, and sideswiping vehicles at the project intersections. These collision types are typical for one-sided control intersections similar to the existing stop-controlled off-ramps at the Lakeport Boulevard interchange. Improving the existing interchange with roundabouts would reduce rear-end and hit object collisions due to the design configuration.

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
A Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) was prepared using readily-available information and applying macro-level analysis and evaluation techniques to provide a technical foundation for developing a preliminary purpose and need statement for the proposed project, and to outline the scope and magnitude of the more detailed traffic studies to be conducted as part of the PA&ED phase of project development. The key findings of the TEPA include:

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 3
Current Operating Conditions
Existing conditions present the analysis scenarios in which current operations at the study location are analyzed and establishes a baseline. No Build conditions assumes that the current geometry and traffic control of the study intersections will remain unchanged.

Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified using existing traffic volumes and existing lane geometrics and controls. Table 4.1 presents the intersection operations and queue lengths for existing conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for the study intersections.

Table 4.1 Existing No Build Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour
Intersection/Lane
Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS
Delay
(s) LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue
(ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd &
Bevins St
TWSC
C 26.1 D - - -
Eastbound C 3.3 A 0.187 66 100
Westbound C 0.1 A 0.004 16 25
Northbound C 26.1 D 0.085 27 25
Southbound C 14.6 B 0.220 61 25
PM
Lakeport Blvd &
Bevins St
TWSC
C 148.8 F - - -
Eastbound C 2.5 A 0.132 60 100
Westbound C 0.0 A - 11 60
Northbound C 148.8 F 0.875 45 25
Southbound C 18.9 C 0.437 154 25
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR
29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 14.1 B - - -
Eastbound C 1.6 A 0.063 40 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 14.1 B 0.420 89 40
Southbound C - - - - -
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR
29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 15.4 C - - -
Eastbound C 3.4 A 0.189 61 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 15.4 C 0.225 1394 40
Southbound C - - - - -
3 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR
29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 16.7 C - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 3.0 A 0.1 37 135
Northbound C - A - - -
Southbound C 16.7 C 0.473 94 600
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR
29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 129.7 F - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 5.8 A 0.294 63 135
Northbound C 9.4 A - - -
Southbound C 129.7 F 1.264 197 600
Notes:

1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control

2. LOS = LOS and Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds

5. - = Data not available
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 4
Crash Data and Analysis
The most recent five years of available collision data were reviewed to identify safety concerns in the project area. A total of 6 collisions were reported in the project area according to data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) from 2018 through 2022.

While this is a relatively small number of overall collisions, analysis of the contributing factors and behaviors involved in the collisions were considered in the development of improvement alternatives at the study intersection.

All six reported collisions occurred within the influence area of the intersections. Four of the collisions were property damage only while the other two resulted in injury in either one or all vehicles involved. Five of the collisions occurred at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 NB Ramps while the other collision occurred at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 SB Ramps. Collisions occurred from the morning to late afternoon/early evening, with one occurring early in the morning, one occurring in the middle of the morning, three occurring at midday/early afternoon, and one occurring in the late afternoon/early evening.

Collision reports in California include a field to assign a Primary Collision Factor believed to be the main contributing behavior, as well as a California Vehicle Code violation, if applicable. Of the six collisions, five had a primary collision factor of automobile right of way, which means that a party failed to appropriately yield to a driver of another automobile. The other collision had a primary collision factor of unsafe starting and backing. These factors suggest a need for improvements that better regulate driver speeds and reduce potential conflicts at the study intersection where it occurred. Table 4.2 shows these findings based on intersection.

Table 4.2 Collisions – City Intersections
Primary
Road
Secondary
Road
Severity Year
Total Collision (2018-2022)
Fatal
Injury (Severe)Injury (Other Visible)Injury (Complaint of Pain)Property Damage Only 20182019202020212022
Lakeport
Blvd
SR 29 SB
Ramps
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lakeport
Blvd
SR 29 NB
Ramps
0 0 0 2 3 0 3 1 1 0 5
Lakeport
Blvd
Bevins St 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), 2023.

TEPA Results Summary
The TEPA provides a qualitative evaluation of the existing operating conditions within the vicinity of the project. It also includes a discussion of recommendations for the scope of more detailed traffic studies to be conducted as part of the PA/ED phase.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 5
Based on the preliminary design and operational analysis, modern roundabouts are the ideal alternative compared to no build conditions. They will provide acceptable traffic operations that meet City and State LOS requirements as the current intersections will not provide acceptable operations in the Opening Year (2030) or Design Year (2050). In addition, the ideal alternative would enhance safety for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians and not require any major changes to the Lakeport overcrossing at SR 29.

5. DEFICIENCIES
Specific deficiencies include the following:
• There are currently no Class I, II, III, or IV bicycle facilities within the study area. • There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern leg of the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and Bevins Street.
• There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern leg of the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 NB Ramps.
• There are no pedestrian facilities on the southern leg of the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 SB Ramps.

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION
The following discussion highlights the state, regional and local planning considerations for the proposed project improvements.

State Planning
Complete Streets
Caltrans Director Policy 37 (DP-37) requires in locations with current and/or future pedestrian, bicycle, or transit needs, all transportation projects funded or overseen by Caltrans to provide comfortable, convenient, and connected complete streets facilities for people walking, biking, and taking transit or passenger rail unless an exception is documented and approved.

Regional Planning
The City of Lakeport plans to add the project to the next update of the Lake County/City Area Planning Council (APC) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

Local Planning
General Plan
The City of Lakeport General Plan 2025 (General Plan) formalizes a long-term vision for the City’s physical development. The improvements would fulfill many policies set forth in the General Plan, including the policies are detailed below.

Roadways and Highways
o Policy T1.1 Roadway Improvements – Implement Lakeport’s Five Year Roadway Capital Improvement Program.
o Policy T5.1 Disruption of Street Improvements – Strive to make improvements to the street network in a manner that minimizes disruption to adjacent residential neighborhoods.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 6
o Policy T9.1 Level of Service - Level of Service (LOS) shall be considered in the Environmental Review process. Level of Service, however, shall not be used as the sole quantitative performance criteria to limit development, or as a prerequisite for approving development.
o Policy T12.1 Improved Traffic Movement - Facilitate free flow of vehicular traffic on arterials and collectors.
o Policy T17.1 Acceptance of Roads into City Street System - Roads shall conform to the City of Lakeport standards for width, grade, structural section, etc., as contained in the Municipal Code.
o Policy T19.1 Funding for Street System Improvement - Utilize, as appropriate, the following funds for improvements to the City’s street system: Measure I sales tax revenue; Redevelopment funds; bonds; improvement or assessment districts; and street light districts.

Bicycle and Trail Facilities
o Policy T21.1 Improve the Bikeways System - Create and maintain a safe, convenient and effective bikeway system.

Pedestrian Facilities
o Policy T25.1 Improve Pedestrian Facilities - Create and maintain a safe and convenient pedestrian system.
o Policy T26.1 Sidewalks in New Street Improvements - Include sidewalks or pedestrian paths in all new street improvements.

Local Road Safety Plan
Improvements to the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange intersections were identified as an area of public concern during development of the current Local Road Safety Plan.

7. ALTERNATIVES
A No-Build Alternative and one Build Alternative were analyzed for this project. The No-Build Alternative assumes existing lane geometrics and intersection controls. The Build Alternative consists of two yield-controlled roundabouts with modified lane geometrics. An alternative involving signalized intersections was not considered as the City does not own/operate any signals and does not have the means to maintain/operate them in the future.

No-Build Alternative
The No-Build Alternative leaves the existing lane geometrics and intersection controls in place.

Under existing conditions, the Lakeport Boulevard/Bevins Road intersection is stop-controlled when traveling in the north-south direction along Bevins Road. Both the Lakeport Boulevard/NB SR-29 off-ramp and Lakeport Boulevard/SB SR-29 off-ramp are stop-controlled.

The Lakeport Boulevard Road at SR-29 interchange intersections are approximately 450 feet apart.

Build Alternative
This alternative would replace the existing study intersections with two modern, yieldcontrolled, single lane roundabouts designed to accommodate the Ultimate Design Year traffic PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 7
forecast volumes. The Build Alternative best meets the efficiency and safety purposes of the project for all modes of travel, while addressing future mobility needs.

The proposed project would address poor traffic operation, delay, safety, and capacity concerns along Lakeport Boulevard in Lake County at the SR 29 NB and SB ramp intersections, including Bevins Road on the east. These improvements are identified as the SR 29 and Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project (project). The City proposes to construct a six-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard, Bevins Road, and the SR 29 NB Ramps, as well as a second four-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and the SR 29 SB Ramps.

Table 7.1 Design Standards Risk Assessment
Design Standards Risk Assessment
Alternative
Design Standard from
Highway Design Manual
Tables 82.1A & 82.1B
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for Probability
Rating
1 202.5 Superelevation
Transition High Typical nonstandard features
for roundabouts that are
1 regularly approved 304.1 Side Slopes
4:1 or Flatter High

8. RIGHT-OF-WAY
The following parcels could potentially be affected by the project and require either frontage acquisition and/or temporary construction easements for conforms/driveway work:
• 005-043-023 – Chevron
• 005-043-018 – McDonalds
• 025-472-002 – Chamber of Commerce
• 005-043-030 – Lake County Department of Agriculture
• 005-043-027 – Existing remnant parcel (for future Kimberly connection) • 025-472-005 – Vista Point Shopping Center (for TCEs/driveway conform) Further evaluation of impacts and right of way needs will be analyzed during PA/ED.

Utilities
The following is a preliminary list of utilities within the construction limits:
• Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) underground electric • City Sewer and City Water - The 2024 Sewer and Water replacement plan has been coordinated with this study to avoid conflicts as the roundabout construction proceeds • Comcast and AT&T communication
Constructing the project may require relocation of the underground facilities.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 8

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Opportunities for community interaction on the project will be available at scoping meetings held early in the PA&ED phase, and at the public hearings during circulation of the draft environmental document. Community group and advocacy group meetings will also provide opportunities for public input throughout the PA&ED phase.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
The project would address capacity and safety concerns along Lakeport Boulevard. The primary purpose of the proposed project is to maximize the existing infrastructure to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. Improving the existing interchange with roundabouts would reduce rear-end and hit object collisions due to the design configuration.

The secondary purpose of this project is to improve operations, reduce delay, and enhance mobility for all travel modes at the interchange. The limits of the project provide a logical terminus relative to the proposed. To date, the project has not generated public controversy.

Noise
The proposed roundabouts would not significantly change the horizontal or vertical alignment or increase the number of through traffic lanes. There will be minor expansion to Bevins Street to the southeast of the intersection to accommodate an entry and exit from the roundabout, however, the project does not meet the definition of a Type 1 project as defined in 23 CFR 772.5(h). The project will generate typical construction noise and vibration due to minor excavation, the reconstruction of streets and sidewalks, and the necessary work to ensure proper utility access and installation. Construction activities necessary to complete the project will not require pile driving, structure demolition, blasting or other such construction techniques.

Air Quality
The project is located within the Lake County Air Basin and is under the jurisdiction of the Lake County Air Quality Management District. Lake County is currently designated as attainment or unclassified for all federal and state ambient air quality standards. The project consists of constructing roundabouts at two intersections, which is not a project type included in 40 CFR 93.123, Table 2, relative to exemption from project level conformity determination.

However, the project is anticipated to be exempt from regional conformity analysis as an intersection channelization project.

Hazardous Materials/Waste
A search of the Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites List (Cortese List) was completed to determine if there are any known hazardous waste facilities located on or adjacent to the project corridor. One open site, identified as New Lakeport Courthouse, was identified on property located southeast of the project corridor on the east side of Highway 29. Review of site documentation notes the presence of elevated concentrations of heavy metals and naturally occurring asbestos detected in soils due to the presence of serpentinite bedrock and fragments in the overlying fill material on the site.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 9
Water Quality/Resources
The National Wetlands Inventory does not identify wetlands or other waters within or adjacent to the project site. The nearest creek, Forbes Creek, is located approximately one-half mile north of the project corridor, and Clear Lake is located approximately one-half mile to the east.

Implementation of Best Management Practices as part of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would minimize any impacts to surface waters. The project is not located within a designated sole-source aquifer.

Coastal Zone
The project is not located within a State Coastal Zone, along the San Francisco Bay, or within Suisun Marsh.

Floodplain
The project is not located within a regulated floodplain.

Wild and Scenic Rivers
The project is not located along a designated Wild and Scenic River.

Biological Resources
No occurrences of special-status plant or wildlife species have been recorded on the project site and there are no known vernal pools, wetlands, ponds, lakes, marshes, or riparian zones at the site. A search of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory for the project vicinity shows no potentially jurisdictional wetlands or waters in the project area. No areas, such as critical habitat pursuant to the State or Federal Endangered Species Act, are mapped at the project site.

No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan exists for the project area. Most of the project site is comprised of developed land, including paved roadway surfaces, sidewalk, and urban landscaping. The proposed project may potentially require removal of trees, which would be scheduled for removal during the non-nesting season and replaced in kind. Recorded occurrence of special status species were noted on property located southeast of the project corridor east of SR-29. Previously recorded species included special status plants, tricolored blackbird, and American badger. Additional study of federally listed threatened or endangered species will occur during PA/ED.

Section 4(F) and 6(F)
SR-29 in the project vicinity is a four-lane divided freeway. The project is located in a small urban/rural setting. Surrounding land uses include County administration buildings, Lake County Chamber of Commerce, a shopping center, car dealership, restaurants, gas station, and AAA branch. There are no known historic sites, publicly owned parks, recreation areas or wildlife refuges (Section 4[f]) within the proposed project area. Additionally, no known Section 6(f) properties are located within or adjacent to the proposed project area.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 10
Visual Resources
SR-29 is identified as an eligible State Scenic Highway but is not officially designated. Clear Lake is located approximately one-half mile east of the project area, however, the project would not impact associated scenic resources. A Visual Impact Assessment questionnaire was completed for the project. The questionnaire resulted in a total project score of 20, which indicates minor visual changes to the environment for which a Visual Impact Assessment Memorandum would be appropriate.

Relocation Impacts
No residential or business properties will be relocated as a part of the project.

Land Use, Community, and Farmland Impacts
The project area west of SR-29 is located within census tract number 06033000300 and is identified as disadvantaged because it meets more than one burden threshold and the associated socioeconomic threshold. The project area east of SR-29 is located in census tract number 06033000400 and is identified as partially disadvantaged. It is surrounded by tracts that are disadvantaged but does not meet the adjusted low-income threshold. The census tracts are not identified as minority populations. While the census tracts are identified as disadvantaged, the project is not expected to disproportionately affect low-income groups, as it is intended to improve the safety and functionality of the roadway for all users.

During the development of this final study, the existing (inactive) Vista Point Shopping Center was purchased by Tribal Health with the intent of creating a regional facility, drawing traffic from all portions of Lake County. Associated impacts have not been included and will need to be analyzed/approved separately.

Constructing the project may require relocation of underground facilities, including electric, gas, sewer, water, and telecommunication lines. Coordination with utility providers will occur during project design, including PG&E, City of Lakeport, Comcast, and AT&T.

Construction would be phased to maintain local access to SR-29 and Lakeport Boulevard. The project may involve short term street closures during construction. Scheduling and detours will be used to minimize any inconvenience to properties in the project area. Due to potential frontage acquisition and/or temporary construction easements for conforms/driveway work, it is possible that one or more parking spaces may be affected. Additional study of detours, possible ramp closures, and parking will occur during PA/ED.

No permanent changes in access will occur and access from SR-29 will not be changed, with the exception of improvements to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. The project will not encroach on state or federal lands, other than existing Caltrans right-of-way along SR-29. The project corridor is located on urban and built-up land, and no designated farmland is present in the project area.

Cultural Resources
The project is not known to encroach on Tribal Land. The project will require screening by Caltrans district professionally qualified staff in order to determine if there are National Register listed or potentially eligible historic properties or archaeological resources within the construction area.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 11

11. FUNDING
Funding to advance the project has not yet been programmed, however the City of Lakeport intends to request funding to advance the PA&ED phase of the project utilizing the funding from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Active Transportation Program (ATP), the federal RAISE program, local funds, or an alternative funding source.

Because of the likely cost of the project, a portion of funding would likely be in the form of federal funds. It has been determined that this project is eligible for Federal-aid funding.

Capital Outlay Cost Estimate
Table 11.1 presents a summary of the escalated capital outlay estimates for the proposed alternatives. Detailed estimates for the two alternatives are presented in Attachment C.

Table 11.1 Summary of Capital Outlay Estimate
Alternative
Estimated Capital Cost
Construction Right-of-Way Utilities
Alt. 1 – Full Project $9.93M $50K TBD
N/B Improvements Only $6.90M $40K TBD
S/B Improvements Only $3.32M $15K TBD
Note: The above costs are escalated to the anticipated year of expenditure.

The level of detail available to develop these capital outlay project estimates is useful for longrange planning purposes only. The potential cost of utility relocation work is not known at this time. The capital outlay project estimates should not be used to program or commit capital outlay funds.

Outlay Support Cost Estimate
Estimated escalated outlay support for programming PA&ED for the preferred project (Roundabout Alternative) for this project is $781,000. Estimated support costs for other phases of work is presented in Table 11.2.

Table 11.2 Summary of Outlay Support Estimate
Alternative
Estimated Support Cost
PA&ED PS&E Right-of-Way Construction
Alt. 1 – Full Project $781K $1.65M $114K $1.81M
N/B Improvements Only $472K $989K $ 80K $1.36M
S/B Improvements Only $363K $726K $ 46K $906K
Note: The above costs are escalated to the anticipated year of expenditure.

The level of detail available to develop outlay support cost estimates for the PA&ED, PS&E, Right-of-Way, and Construction phases is useful for long-range planning purposes only.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 12

12. DELIVERY SCHEDULE
Project Milestones Scheduled Delivery Date
Program Project October 2024
Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase March 2025
Finalize PA&ED Phase / Begin Design June 2026
Final Design / Ready to List December 2027
Begin Construction April 2028
Complete Construction December 2030
The anticipated funding fiscal year for construction is to be determined.

13. RISKS
The following risks could potentially affect the project:
• Adjacent Project Consistency: Potential schedule delays and budget increases can be caused during adjacent project design development (i.e. Courthouse and Mall Redevelopment) activities.
• Revised Hydromodification Requirements: Potential schedule delays and budget increases can be caused by significant changes to hydromodification standards required for construction of the project.
• Funding: Potential schedule delays and budget increases can be caused by availability of funding.
• Right-of-Way: Potential schedule delays can be caused by negotiations with property owners for easements and access rights required for construction of the project. • Environmental: Potential schedule delays and budget increases can be caused by listing of new species, updated permitting requirements, or identification of hazardous materials (i.e. naturally occurring asbestos/serpentine or aerially deposited lead).

14. EXTERNAL AGENCY COORDINATION
The project is considered to be a delegated project in accordance with the current Stewardship and Oversight Agreement between Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans dated May 28, 2015.

The project requires the following coordination:

Regional Water Quality Control Board
Water Quality Certification
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6 PAGE 13

15. PROJECT REVIEWS
Field Review WMH and GHD Design Staff Date Aug 31, 2023 District Maintenance Date TBD
District Traffic Safety Engineer Date TBD
Headquarters Project Delivery Coordinator Date TBD
Project Manager Date TBD
FHWA Date TBD
District Safety Review Date TBD
Constructability Review Date TBD
Other Date TBD

16. PROJECT PERSONNEL
Sean Charles – Consultant Program Manager_________________ (415) 601-1900 Heather Anderson – Consultant Project Manager ______________ (530) 515-7948 Shawn Vogtman – Consultant QMP Manager ________________ (408) 687-7266

17. ATTACHMENTS
A. Project Overview Exhibit _______________________________________ 1 Page B. Layout and Typical Sections ____________________________________ 5 Pages C. Preliminary Cost Estimates ____________________________________ 33 Pages D. Preliminary Environmental Investigation __________________________ 5 Pages E. Basis of Design Memo ________________________________________ 4 Pages F. Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment
& Intersection Control Evaluation (TEPA-ICE) ____________________ 96 Pages G. Complete Streets Decision Document (CSDD) _____________________ 5 Pages H. Vehicle-Miles Traveled Decision Document (VMTDD) ______________ 5 Pages I. Right of Way Exhibits _________________________________________ 5 Pages J. Storm Water Data Report _____________________________________ 12 Pages K. Conceptual Staging Exhibits ____________________________________ 3 Pages L. Proposed and Existing Utility Exhibit ______________________________ 1 Page M. Quality Management Plan (v0.1) _______________________________ 11 Pages

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT A

OVERVIEW EXHIBIT
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCALE: 1"=150'
FEBRUARY 2024 NB Exit Ramp NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St Lakeport Blvd Bevins St Lakeport Blvd SB Exit Ramp SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd Parallel Dr Parallel Dr

MEDIAN ISLAND, RAISED

MOUNTABLE TRUCK APRON

POTENTIAL LANDSCAPE AREA
LEGEND

OVERVIEW EXHIBIT
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT B

LAYOUTS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS
LAYOUT SCALE: 1"=50' FEBRUARY 2024 11' 15' STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 20' 20' 11' 12'12' 15' 11' 17' 22' 17' 19' 11' 11' 20' 21' 18'12' 11' 11' 20' 12' 29' CONFORM TO EXISTING SIDEWALK 12' 17' 21' 17' 11' 18' 17' 11' 19' 18' 12' 12' 17' 10' 12' 16' SUP SUP CONFORMTO EXISTING SIDEWALK SUP SUP SUP SHARED USE PATH ABBREVIATION EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 1. FOR ACCURATE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, CONTACT RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING AT THE DISTRICT OFFICE 2. PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IS FOR DESIGN STANDARD APPLICABILITY PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS WILL BE DETERMINED IN LATER PHASES. NOTES CONFORM TO EXISTING DRIVEWAY PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE NB Exit Ramp NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St Lakeport Blvd Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd
Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr LEGEND 11' 11'
3' TRAVELED WAY 3'
Shld TRAVELED WAY Shld 3'
3' Shld TRAVELED WAY Shld 3'
3' TRAVELED WAY SHLD

TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS

NO SCALE
FEBRUARY 2024

SECTION A-A
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

SECTION B-B
4:1 OR
4:1 OR

FLATTER

1.5%

ETW ETW
HP

BUF BUFFER

C&G CURB AND GUTTER

SUP SHARED USE PATH
LEGEND: HP
Var 2' TO 8'
ES

ETW ETW
Var
2' TO 4'
Var 12' TO 18'
Var 12' TO 17'
C&G (TYPE A2-6) C&G (TYPE A2-6)
ES HP

SECTION D-D

ETW ETW

1.5%
ES ES
4:1 OR

FLATTER
Var 2' 12' Var 2' TO 8'
TO 4'
HP HP

SECTION C-C
4:1 OR

FLATTER
HP
Var 12' TO 20'

ETW ETW

1.5%

PRELIMINARY

SUBJECT TO CHANGE

RETAINING WALL
2'

RETAINING WALL
FG OG
FG OG
OG FG
FG
OG

TRAVELED WAY
Exist
SW SHLD 3.5' TRAVELED WAY SHLD
3' SUP BUF TRAVELED WAY 2' SPLITTER ISLAND 2' TRAVELED WAY 3' 3' SUP BUF TRAVELED WAY 2' SPLITTER ISLAND 2' TRAVELED WAY BUF SUP 3' SUP BUF TRAVELED WAY APRON CENTRAL ISLAND APRON TRAVELED WAY 3'

TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS

SECTION G-G
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

SECTION H-H

1.5%
MATCH
Exist
CURB (TYPE B1-6)

NO SCALE
FEBRUARY 2024
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
10' Var 3'
TO 5'
4:1 OR
FLATTER 1.5% 1.5%
Var 11' TO 17' Var 2' TO 11' Var 11' TO 18'
C&G (TYPE A2-6)

ETW ETW ETW ETW
HP
5' 7' 11' 11' 7'
4:1 OR FLATTER
HP

SECTION E-E

SECTION F-F

1.5% 1.5%

1.5% 2% 2% 1.5%

CURB (TYPE CENTRAL ISLAND)

CURB (TYPE CENTRAL ISLAND)
CURB (TYPE D-4 Mod) CURB (TYPE D-4 Mod)
CURB (TYPE B1-6)
10' Var 12' TO 16' Var 6' TO 24' Var 12' TO 17' Var
5' TO 7'
Var 17' TO 21' Var 14' TO 23' Var 62' TO 81' Var 14' TO 23' Var 17' TO 21' 3' 10'
HP HP

ETW ETW ETW ETW

1.5% 1.5%
10' 3'

1.5%

ETW ETW ETW ETW
HP
4:1 OR

FLATTER
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)

PRELIMINARY

SUBJECT TO CHANGE

ETW ETW ETW ETW
FG
OG
OG
OG
FG
4:1 OR FLATTER
FG
OG

RETAINING WALL
3' SUP Buf TRAVELED WAY APRON CENTRAL ISLAND APRON TRAVELED WAY 3' SUP Buf TRAVELED WAY 2' SPLITTER ISLAND 2' TRAVELED WAY 3' 3' Exist SW BUF TRAVELED WAY SPLITTER ISLAND TRAVELED WAY 3' Exist SW BUF TRAVELED WAY TWLTL TRAVELED WAY 3'

TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

SECTION J-J

1.5%

CURB (TYPE CENTRAL ISLAND)

CURB (TYPE CENTRAL ISLAND)
CURB (TYPE D-4 Mod) CURB (TYPE D-4 Mod)

NO SCALE
FEBRUARY 2024
4:1 OR 2% 2% 1.5%

FLATTER
HP HP

ETW ETW ETW ETW
10' Var Var 20' to 21' Var 19' to 51' Var 87' TO 134' Var 19' to 51' Var 20' to 25' C&G (TYPE A2-6) C&G (TYPE A2-6)

SECTION I-I

1.5%
CURB (TYPE B1-6)
HP
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
HP

1.5%
Var 9'
TO 24'
4:1 OR FLATTER
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
10'

ETW ETW ETW ETW
Var 12' TO 17' Var 3' TO 16' Var 12' TO 19'

SECTION K-K

SECTION L-L
CURB (TYPE B1-6)
2:1 OR

FLATTER

ETW ETW ETW ETW

1.5%

1.5%
HP
2:1 OR

FLATTER

ETW ETW ETW ETW HP
11' 11'
11' 11' 11'
Var 5' TO 27'
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
C&G (TYPE A2-6)
8' Var 10' TO 36'
8' Var 10' TO 36'

PRELIMINARY

SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FG
OG
OG
FG
FG
OG
OG
FG
3' TRAVELED WAY 2' SPLITTER ISLAND 2' TRAVELED WAY 2' SPLITTER ISLAND 2' TRAVELED WAY BUF SUP

SPLITTER ISLAND TRAVELED WAY
1'
3' TRAVELED WAY 3'

TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

SECTION N-N
CURB (TYPE B1-6)

NO SCALE
FEBRUARY 2024

1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%

HP ETW ETW ETW ETW ETW ETW
Var 11' TO 18' Var 3' TO 10' Var 11' TO 17' Var 8' TO 81' Var 11' TO 15' 5' 8' C&G (TYPE A2-6) C&G (TYPE A2-6) CURB (TYPE B1-6)

SECTION M-M
CURB (TYPE B1-6)
4:1 OR

FLATTER

1.5%

1.5%
HP HP

ETW ETW ETW ETW
Var 11' TO 21' Var 3' TO 26' 12'
C&G (TYPE A2-6) C&G (TYPE A2-6)

PRELIMINARY

SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FG OG

RETAINING WALL
4:1 OR FLATTER
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT C

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
• Alternative 1 – Full Project
• N/B Improvements Only
• S/B Improvements Only
EA: TBD PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) Dist-Cty-Rte: 01-LAK-29
PM: 41.2/41.6 1 of 11

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Current Year Cost Escalated Cost
$ 2,813,500 $ 3,320,000
$ - $ -
$ 2,813,500 $ 3,320,000
$ 10,000 $ 15,000
$ 2,824,000 $ 3,335,000
$ 350,000 $ 363,000
$ 700,000 $ 726,000
$ 40,000 $ 46,000
$ 800,000 $ 906,000
$ 1,890,000 $ 2,041,000
$ 4,720,000 $ 5,400,000
Programmed Amount
Month / Year
Date of Estimate (Month/Year) 3 / 2024
Estimated Construction Start (Month/Year) 3 / 2028
Number of Working Days = 360
Estimated Mid-Point of Construction (Month/Year) 12 / 2028 Estimated Construction End (Month/Year) 10 / 2029
Number of Plant Establishment Days 260
6/24/2024
6/30/2026
10/1/2027
12/1/2027
Spring 2028
Paul Curren, Engineer Date Phone
Kevin Ingram, City Manager Date Phone

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST

TOTAL ROADWAY COST
Type of Estimate :

PA/ED SUPPORT
Program Code :

Project Limits :

Preliminary Project Cost Estimate
TBD
Lakeport Boulevard Overcrossing - S/B Direction Only
Intersection Improvements Project
Intersection Replacement, Multimodal Infrastructure Construction Project Description:

Scope :

TOTAL STRUCTURES COST

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
Alternative : S/B Direction Only
Approved
RTL
PID Approval
PA/ED Approval
PS&E

PS&E SUPPORT

TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT
Approval Recommended
Begin Construction

TOTAL SUPPORT COST
Estimated Project Schedule

TOTAL PROJECT COST
1 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) I. ROADWAY ITEMS SUMMARY
Cost
1 81,500$
2 918,100$
3 92,400$
4 146,500$
5 347,400$
6 265,000$
7 -$
8 55,600$
9 190,700$
10 115,400$
11 38,200$
12 -$
13 562,700$
$ 2,813,500
3/25/2024
Sean Charles, PE Date Phone
3/25/2024
Heather Anderson, PE Date Phone
By signing this estimate you are attesting that you have discussed your project with all functional units and have incorporated all their comments or have discussed with them why they will not be incorporated.

State Furnished
Section
Earthwork
Pavement Structural Section
Drainage
Specialty Items
Supplemental Work
Estimate Reviewed By :

Time-Related Overhead
Roadway Contingency
Environmental
Traffic Items
Detours
Minor Items
Roadway Mobilization

TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
Estimate Prepared By :
2 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY 1,200 x 30.00 = $ 36,000
152320 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
194001 Ditch Excavation CY x = $ -
198010 Imported Borrow CY x = $ -
192037 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 120 x 25.00 = $ 3,000 193013 Structure Backfill (Retaining Wall) CY 60 x 125.00 = $ 7,500 193031 Pervious Backfill Material (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 16010X Clearing & Grubbing LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000
170101 Develop Water Supply LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 210130 Duff ACRE x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 81,500
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
401050 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement CY x = $ -
400050 Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement CY x = $ - 404092 Seal Pavement Joint LF x = $ -
404093 Seal Isolation Joint LF x = $ -
413117 Seal Concrete Pavement Joint (Silicone) LF x = $ - 413118 Seal Pavement Joint (Asphalt Rubber) LF x = $ -
280010 Rapid Strength Concrete Base CY x = $ -
410095 Dowel Bar (Drill and Bond) EA x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 2,480 x 180.00 = $ 446,400 390137 Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) TON 290 x 260.00 = $ 75,400 395041 RHMA-O (Open Graded Fiction Course) TON 150 x 280.00 = $ 42,000 393006 Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer (Paving Grid) SQYD 2,670 x 14.00 = $ 37,380 260203 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 490 x 90.00 = $ 44,100 290201 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
374002 Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat) TON x = $ -
397005 Tack Coat TON 1 x 1,500.00 = $ 1,500
390100 Prime Coat TON x = $ -
377501 Slurry Seal TON x = $ -
3750XX Screenings (Type XX) TON x = $ -
374492 Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified) TON x = $ - 370001 Sand Cover (Seal) TON x = $ -
731530A Hot Mix Asphalt (Textured Paving) TONS x = $ -
730020 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 20 x 1,000.00 = $ 20,000 731504 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) CY 60 x 1,100.00 = $ 66,000 731519 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 3,500 x 25.00 = $ 87,500 731521 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 50 x 1,000.00 = $ 50,000 39407X Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type E) LF x = $ -
150771 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF x = $ -
420201 Grind Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
150860 Remove Base and Surfacing CY x = $ -
390095 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing CY x = $ -
15312X Remove Concrete LF/CY/LS x = $ -
394090 Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Miscellaneous Area) SQYD x = $ - 398200 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement (0.2') SQYD 2,390 x 20.00 = $ 47,800 39405X Shoulder Rumble Strip (HMA, X-In Indentations) STA x = $ - 413113 Repair Spalled Joints, Polyester Grout SQYD x = $ - 420102 Groove Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
390136 Minor Hot Mix Asphalt TON x = $ -
394095 Roadside Paving (Miscellaneous Areas) SQYD x = $ - XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 918,100

TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS

TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS
3 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
710132 Remove Culvert LF x = $ -
150820 Modify Inlet EA x = $ -
155232 Sand Backfill CY x = $ -
15020X Abandon Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
152430 Adjust Inlet LF x = $ -
155003 Cap Inlet EA x = $ -
510501 Minor Concrete CY x = $ -
510094 Structural Concrete, Drainage Inlet CY 6 x 1,200.00 = $ 7,200 3 Ea G2 Inlets 5105XX Minor Concrete (Type XX) CY x = $ -
610112 24" Alternative Pipe Culvert LF 220 x 350.00 = $ 77,000 6411XX XX" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
65XXXX XX" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 6650XX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 68XXXX XX" Plastic Pipe (Edge Drain) LF x = $ -
69011X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Downdrain (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70321X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Inlet (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 710150 Remove Inlet EA x = $ -
705315 24" Alternative Flared End Section EA 1 x 1,200.00 = $ 1,200 703233 Grated Line Drain LF x = $ -
72XXXX Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method) CY/TON x = $ - 72901X Rock Slope Protection Fabric (Class X) SQYD x = $ - 721420 Concrete (Ditch Lining) CY x = $ -
721430 Concrete (Channel Lining) CY x = $ -
750001 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB 700 x 10.00 = $ 7,000 10 Ea 24-12X Grates $ 92,400
SECTION 4: SPECIALTY ITEMS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
080050 Progress Schedule (Critical Path Method) LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 582001 Sound Wall (Masonry Block) SQFT x = $ -
510530 Minor Concrete (Wall) CY x = $ -
15325X Remove Sound Wall LF/LS x = $ -
141120 Treated Wood Waste LB x = $ -
153221 Remove Concrete Barrier LF 130 x 50.00 = $ 6,500 839752 Remove Guardrail LF 150 x 15.00 = $ 2,250
150668 Remove Flared End Section EA x = $ -
800361 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-6, Vinyl-Clad) LF 100 x 50.00 = $ 5,000 037001 Alternative Crash Cushion System EA 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 832005 Midwest Guardrail System LF x = $ -
839301 Single Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839310 Double Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839521 Cable Railing LF x = $ -
8395XX Terminal System (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
839585 Alternative Flared Terminal System EA x = $ -
839584 Alternative In-line Terminal System EA x = $ -
498052 60" CIDH Concrete Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ - 839XXX Crash Cushion (Insert Type) EA x = $ -
520103 Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall) LB 7,950 x 3.00 = $ 23,850 510060 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall CY 49 x 1,100.00 = $ 53,900 833088 Tubular Handrailing LF x = $ -
513553 Retaining Wall (Masonry Wall) SQFT x = $ -
511035 Architectural Treatment SQFT x = $ -
598001 Anti-Graffiti Coating SQFT x = $ -
203070 Rock Stain SQFT x = $ -
5136XX Reinforced Concrete Crib Wall (Type X) SQFT x = $ - 839543 Transition Railing (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
597601 Prepare and Stain Concrete SQFT x = $ -
839561 Rail Tensioning Assembly EA x = $ -
83958X End Anchor Assembly (Type X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Relocate Fire Hydrant EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Adjust Utilities to Grade EA x = $ -
$ 146,500

TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS

TOTAL SPECIALTY ITEMS
4 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Biological Mitigation LS x = $ -
130670 Temporary Reinforced Silt Fence LF 150 x 15.00 = $ 2,250 141000 Temporary Fence (Type ESA) LF 50 x 15.00 = $ 750 Subtotal Environmental Mitigation $ 3,000
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
20XXXX Highway Planting LS 1 x 40,000.00 = $ 40,000
20XXXX Irrigation System LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000
204099 Plant Establishment Work LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000 20XXXX Relocate City Sign/Artwork LS x = $ -
20XXXX Maintain Existing (Irrigation or Planted Areas) LS x = $ - 200114 Rock Blanket SQFT 900 x 50.00 = $ 45,000
200111 Decorative Boulders EA 3 x 5,000.00 = $ 15,000
200122 Weed Germination SQYD x = $ -
208304 Water Meter EA x = $ -
2087XX XX" Conduit (Use for Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ - Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation 140,000 $
5C - EROSION CONTROL
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
210010 Move In/Move Out (Erosion Control) EA 2 x 1,500.00 = $ 3,000 210350 Fiber Rolls LF 3,000 x 5.00 = $ 15,000
210360 Compost Sock LF x = $ -
2102XX Bioretention LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000
21025X Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT/ACRE x = $ -
210300 Hydromulch SQFT 25,500 x 0.10 = $ 2,550
210420 Straw SQFT x = $ -
210430 Hydroseed SQFT 25,500 x 0.20 = $ 5,100
210600 Compost SQFT 25,500 x 0.25 = $ 6,375
210630 Incorporate Materials SQFT 25,500 x 0.50 = $ 12,750 Subtotal Erosion Control $ 64,775
5D - NPDES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
130300 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
130200 Prepare WPCP LS x = $ -
130100 Job Site Management LS 1 x 25,000.00 = $ 25,000
130330 Storm Water Annual Report EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130310 Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130320 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis Day EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130520 Temporary Hydraulic Mulch SQYD 2,400 x 2.00 = $ 4,800 130550 Temporary Hydroseed SQYD 2,400 x 2.00 = $ 4,800
130505 Move-In/Move-Out (Temporary Erosion Control) EA 2 x 2,500.00 = $ 5,000 130640 Temporary Fiber Roll LF 1,000 x 1.50 = $ 1,500
130900 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130710 Temporary Construction Entrance EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130610 Temporary Check Dam LF x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 10 x 350.00 = $ 3,500 130730 Street Sweeping LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000
Subtotal NPDES $ 139,600
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL $ 347,400
Supplemental Work for NPDES
066595 Water Pollution Control Maintenance Sharing* LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 066596 Additional Water Pollution Control** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 066597 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis*** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
Subtotal Supplemental Work for NDPS $ 20,000
*** Applies only to project with SWPPPs.
*Applies to all SWPPPs and those WPCPs with sediment control or soil stabilization BMPs. **Applies to both SWPPPs and WPCP projects.
5 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 6: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
860460 Lighting and Sign Illumination LS 1 x 100,000.00 = $ 100,000 860201 Signal and Lighting LS x = $ -
860990 Closed Circuit Television System LS x = $ -
86110X Ramp Metering System (Location X) LS x = $ -
86070X Interconnection Conduit and Cable LF/LS x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
5602XX Install Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
498040 XX" CIDHC Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ -
86080X Inductive Loop Detectors EA/LS x = $ -
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (Type X) LS x = $ -
15075X Remove Sign Structure EA x = $ -
151581 Reconstruct Sign Structure EA x = $ -
152641 Modify Sign Structure EA x = $ -
860090 Maintain Existing Traffic Management System Elements During Construction LS x = $ - 86XXXX Fiber Optic Conduit System LS x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 100,000
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
566011 Roadside Sign - One Post EA x = $ -
566012 Roadside Sign - Two Post EA x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign SQFT x = $ -
568016 Install Sign Panel on Existing Frame SQFT x = $ - 150711 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe LF x = $ -
141101 Remove Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe (Haz Waste) LF x = $ - 150712 Remove Painted Pavement Marking SQFT x = $ -
150742 Remove Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152320 Reset Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152390 Relocate Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
840502 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) LF x = $ - 846012 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) SQFT x = $ - 120090 Construction Area Signs LS 1 x 15,000.00 = $ 15,000 56XXXX Roadside Signs LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation LS 1 x 20,000.00 = $ 20,000 Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 55,000
6C - Traffic Management Plan
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
12865X Portable Changeable Message Signs LS 1 x $ 30,000 = $ 30,000 Subtotal Traffic Management Plan $ 30,000
6C - Stage Construction and Traffic Handling
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120199 Traffic Plastic Drum EA x = $ -
12016X Channelizer (Type X) EA x = $ -
120120 Type III Barricade EA x = $ -
129100 Temporary Crash Cushion Module EA x = $ -
120100 Traffic Control System LS x = $ -
129110 Temporary Crash Cushion EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Stage Construction LS 1 x 80,000.00 = $ 80,000
Subtotal Stage Construction and Traffic Handling $ 80,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 265,000
6 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 7: DETOURS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON x = $ -
26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
128601 Temporary Signal System LS x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
80010X Temporary Fence (Type X) LF x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
$ -
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 1,850,900 $
SECTION 8: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items 0.5% $ 9,255
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items 0.5% $ 9,255
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items 2.0% $ 37,018
Total of Section 1-7 $ 1,850,900 x 3.0% = $ 55,527
$ 55,600
SECTIONS 9: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
Item code
999990 Total Section 1-8 $ x 10% = 1,906,500 $ 190,650
$ 190,700
SECTION 10: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066670 Payment Adjustments For Price Index
Fluctuations LS x = $ -
066094 Value Analysis LS x = $ -
066070 Maintain Traffic LS x = $ -
066919 Dispute Resolution Board LS x = $ -
066921 Dispute Resolution Advisor LS x = $ -
066015 Federal Trainee Program LS x = $ -
066610 Partnering LS x = $ -
066204 Remove Rock and Debris LS x = $ -
066222 Locate Existing Crossover LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Cost of NPDES Supplemental Work specified in Section 5D = $ 20,000 Total Section 1-8 $ 1,906,500 5% = $ 95,325
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 115,400
Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal

TOTAL DETOURS

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS

TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
* Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal
7 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) SECTION 11: STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS AND EXPENSES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066105 Resident Engineers Office LS x = $0
066063 Traffic Management Plan - Public Information LS x = $0 066901 Water Expenses LS x = $0
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (X) LS x = $0
066841 Traffic Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066840 Traffic Signal Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066062 COZEEP Contract LS x = $0
066838 Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer LS x = $0
066065 Tow Truck Service Patrol LS x = $0
066916 Annual Construction General Permit Fee LS x = $0 XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $0
Total Section 1-8 $ 1,906,500 2% = $ 38,130
$38,200
SECTION 12: TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD
Total of Roadway and Structures Contract Items excluding Mobilization $1,906,500 (used to calculate TRO) Total Construction Cost (excluding TRO and Contingency) $2,250,800 (used to check if project is greater than $5 million excluding contingency) Estimated Time-Related Overhead (TRO) Percentage (0% to 10%) = 5% Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
090100 Time-Related Overhead WD 360 X $0 = $0
TOTAL TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD $0
SECTION 13: ROADWAY CONTINGENCY
Total Section 1-12 $ 2,250,800 x 25% = $562,700
TOTAL CONTINGENCY $562,700

TOTAL STATE FURNISHED
8 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
STRUCTURES MOBILIZATION 10%
Recommended Contingency: (Pre-PSR 30%-50%, PSR 25%, Draft PR 20%, PR 15%, after PR approval 10%, Final PS&E 5%) Total recommended percentages includes any quantified risk based contingency from the risk register.

STRUCTURES CONTINGENCY 10%

TOTAL COST OF STRUCTURES
Estimate Prepared By:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ------ Division of Structures Date
$0
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST OF BRIDGES $0
TOTAL COST OF BUILDINGS $0
$0
$0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Bridge Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
Bridge 3
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Bridge Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
9 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) III. RIGHT OF WAY
Fill in all of the available information from the Right of Way Data Sheet.

A) A1) Acquisition, including Excess Land Purchases, Damages & Goodwill, Fees $ 10,000 TCEs A2) SB-1210 $ 0
B) Acquisition of Offsite Mitigation $ 0
C) C1) Utility Relocation (Local Agency Share) $ 0
C2) Potholing (Design Phase) $ 30,000
D) Railroad Acquisition $ 0
E) Clearance / Demolition $ 0
F) Relocation Assistance (RAP and/or Last Resort Housing Costs) $ 0 G) $ 0
H) Environmental Review $ 0
I) 0% $ 0
J) Design Appreciation Factor 0% $ 0
K) Utility Relocation (Construction Cost) $ 0
L)
M)
N)
1 When estimate has Support Costs only 2 When estimate has Utility Relocation 3 When R/W Acquisition is required Utility Estimate Prepared
By Utility Coordinator2
Phone
R/W Acquisition Estimate
Prepared By Right of Way Estimator3
Phone
$10,000
Title and Escrow
Condemnation Settlements
Note: Items G & H applied to items A + B

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
Support Cost Estimate
Prepared By Project Coordinator1
Phone
TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE: Escalated $15,000
RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $40,000
10 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (S/B) DO NOT PRINT THIS SHEET AS PART OF COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT TO PROJECT INITIATION OR APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.

IV. SUPPORT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Run a Support Cost Estimate Summary report (D11 Project Management Support onramp) for component data.

Total by FY PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ <2016 Expended
ETC
2017 Expended
ETC
2018 Expended
ETC
2019 Expended
ETC
2020 Expended
ETC
2021 Expended
ETC
2022 Expended
ETC
2023 Expended
ETC $200,000 $200,000
2024 Expended
ETC $150,000 $200,000 $163,000 $200,000
2025 Expended
ETC $400,000 $417,000
2026 Expended
ETC $100,000 $40,000 $400,000 $109,000 $46,000 $453,000 2027 Expended
ETC $400,000 $453,000
2028 Expended
ETC
2029 Expended
ETC
2030 Expended
ETC
$350,000 $700,000 $40,000 $800,000 $1,890,000 $363,000 $726,000 $46,000 $906,000 $2,041,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escalated Risk Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Note: If you have already accounted fo

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$350,000 $700,000 $40,000 $800,000 Total Esc. Support Cost $363,000 $726,000 $46,000 $906,000 $2,041,000 -$350,000 -$700,000 -$40,000 -$800,000 -$1,890,000 $363,000 -$726,000 -$46,000 -$906,000 -$1,315,000

12.4% 24.8% 1.4% 28.3% 66.9% 12.9% 25.7% 1.6% 32.1% 72.3% Office Chief - Date
Project Control - Date
Overall Percent Support Cost: 72.27%
Total Capital Outlay Support Cost: $2,041,000
Total Capital Cost: $2,824,000
PRSM workplan hours/costs verified
against approved MWA:

Approved by:

EAC (Expended + ETC)
Approved Budget (PRSM)
Difference (Budget - EAC)
Support Ratio (EAC / Cap Cost)
Duration to mid-point component
Total including Risk Amount
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Support Escalation Rate
Unescalated-Risk Loaded Escalated (4.2% per year for ETC, effective 1/2/2018 ) $200,000
$363,000
$400,000
$200,000
$350,000
$400,000 $417,000
$608,000
$453,000
$540,000
EA: TBD PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) Dist-Cty-Rte: 01-LAK-29
PM: 41.2/41.6 1 of 11

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Current Year Cost Escalated Cost
$ 5,852,700 $ 6,900,000
$ - $ -
$ 5,852,700 $ 6,900,000
$ 30,000 $ 40,000
$ 5,883,000 $ 6,940,000
$ 450,000 $ 472,000
$ 950,000 $ 989,000
$ 70,000 $ 80,000
$ 1,200,000 $ 1,358,000
$ 2,670,000 $ 2,899,000
$ 8,600,000 $ 9,850,000
Programmed Amount
Month / Year
Date of Estimate (Month/Year) 3 / 2024
Estimated Construction Start (Month/Year) 3 / 2028
Number of Working Days = 360
Estimated Mid-Point of Construction (Month/Year) 12 / 2028 Estimated Construction End (Month/Year) 10 / 2029
Number of Plant Establishment Days 260
6/24/2024
6/30/2026
10/1/2027
12/1/2027
Spring 2028
Paul Curren, Engineer Date Phone
Kevin Ingram, City Manager Date Phone

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST

TOTAL ROADWAY COST
Type of Estimate :

PA/ED SUPPORT
Program Code :

Project Limits :

Preliminary Project Cost Estimate
TBD
Lakeport Boulevard Overcrossing - N/B Direction Only
Intersection Improvements Project
Intersection Replacement, Multimodal Infrastructure Construction Project Description:

Scope :

TOTAL STRUCTURES COST

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
Alternative : N/B Direction Only
Approved
RTL
PID Approval
PA/ED Approval
PS&E

PS&E SUPPORT

TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT
Approval Recommended
Begin Construction

TOTAL SUPPORT COST
Estimated Project Schedule

TOTAL PROJECT COST
1 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) I. ROADWAY ITEMS SUMMARY
Cost
1 365,000$
2 1,734,400$
3 331,400$
4 32,500$
5 970,200$
6 435,000$
7 -$
8 116,100$
9 398,500$
10 219,300$
11 79,700$
12 -$
13 1,170,600$
$ 5,852,700
3/25/2024
Sean Charles, PE Date Phone
3/25/2024
Heather Anderson, PE Date Phone
By signing this estimate you are attesting that you have discussed your project with all functional units and have incorporated all their comments or have discussed with them why they will not be incorporated.

State Furnished
Section
Earthwork
Pavement Structural Section
Drainage
Specialty Items
Supplemental Work
Estimate Reviewed By :

Time-Related Overhead
Roadway Contingency
Environmental
Traffic Items
Detours
Minor Items
Roadway Mobilization

TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
Estimate Prepared By :
2 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY 4,800 x 30.00 = $ 144,000
152320 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
194001 Ditch Excavation CY x = $ -
198010 Imported Borrow CY 1,200 x 105.00 = $ 126,000
192037 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 193013 Structure Backfill (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ -
193031 Pervious Backfill Material (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 16010X Clearing & Grubbing LS 1 x 80,000.00 = $ 80,000
170101 Develop Water Supply LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 210130 Duff ACRE x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 365,000
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
401050 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement CY x = $ -
400050 Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement CY x = $ - 404092 Seal Pavement Joint LF x = $ -
404093 Seal Isolation Joint LF x = $ -
413117 Seal Concrete Pavement Joint (Silicone) LF x = $ - 413118 Seal Pavement Joint (Asphalt Rubber) LF x = $ -
280010 Rapid Strength Concrete Base CY x = $ -
410095 Dowel Bar (Drill and Bond) EA x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 3,760 x 180.00 = $ 676,800 390137 Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) TON 300 x 260.00 = $ 78,000 395041 RHMA-O (Open Graded Fiction Course) TON 150 x 280.00 = $ 42,000 393006 Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer (Paving Grid) SQYD 6,860 x 14.00 = $ 96,040 260203 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 1,710 x 90.00 = $ 153,900 290201 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
374002 Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat) TON x = $ -
397005 Tack Coat TON 3 x 1,500.00 = $ 4,500
390100 Prime Coat TON x = $ -
377501 Slurry Seal TON x = $ -
3750XX Screenings (Type XX) TON x = $ -
374492 Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified) TON x = $ - 370001 Sand Cover (Seal) TON x = $ -
731530A Hot Mix Asphalt (Textured Paving) TONS x = $ -
730020 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 40 x 1,000.00 = $ 40,000 731504 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) CY 160 x 1,100.00 = $ 176,000 731519 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 12,500 x 25.00 = $ 312,500 731521 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 50 x 1,000.00 = $ 50,000 39407X Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type E) LF x = $ -
150771 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF x = $ -
420201 Grind Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
150860 Remove Base and Surfacing CY x = $ -
390095 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing CY x = $ -
15312X Remove Concrete LF/CY/LS x = $ -
394090 Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Miscellaneous Area) SQYD x = $ - 398200 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement (0.2') SQYD 5,230 x 20.00 = $ 104,600 39405X Shoulder Rumble Strip (HMA, X-In Indentations) STA x = $ - 413113 Repair Spalled Joints, Polyester Grout SQYD x = $ - 420102 Groove Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
390136 Minor Hot Mix Asphalt TON x = $ -
394095 Roadside Paving (Miscellaneous Areas) SQYD x = $ - XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 1,734,400

TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS

TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS
3 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
710132 Remove Culvert LF 280 x 80.00 = $ 22,400
150820 Modify Inlet EA x = $ -
155232 Sand Backfill CY x = $ -
15020X Abandon Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
152430 Adjust Inlet LF x = $ -
155003 Cap Inlet EA x = $ -
510501 Minor Concrete CY x = $ -
510094 Structural Concrete, Drainage Inlet CY 14 x 1,200.00 = $ 16,800 7 Ea G2 Inlets 5105XX Minor Concrete (Type XX) CY x = $ -
610112 24" Alternative Pipe Culvert LF 780 x 350.00 = $ 273,000 6411XX XX" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
65XXXX XX" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 6650XX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 68XXXX XX" Plastic Pipe (Edge Drain) LF x = $ -
69011X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Downdrain (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70321X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Inlet (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 710150 Remove Inlet EA 2 x 500.00 = $ 1,000
705315 24" Alternative Flared End Section EA 1 x 1,200.00 = $ 1,200 703233 Grated Line Drain LF x = $ -
72XXXX Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method) CY/TON x = $ - 72901X Rock Slope Protection Fabric (Class X) SQYD x = $ - 721420 Concrete (Ditch Lining) CY x = $ -
721430 Concrete (Channel Lining) CY x = $ -
750001 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB 1,700 x 10.00 = $ 17,000 10 Ea 24-12X Grates $ 331,400
SECTION 4: SPECIALTY ITEMS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
080050 Progress Schedule (Critical Path Method) LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 582001 Sound Wall (Masonry Block) SQFT x = $ -
510530 Minor Concrete (Wall) CY x = $ -
15325X Remove Sound Wall LF/LS x = $ -
141120 Treated Wood Waste LB x = $ -
153221 Remove Concrete Barrier LF x = $ -
839752 Remove Guardrail LF 100 x 15.00 = $ 1,500
150668 Remove Flared End Section EA x = $ -
800361 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-6, Vinyl-Clad) LF x = $ - 037001 Alternative Crash Cushion System EA x = $ -
832005 Midwest Guardrail System LF x = $ -
839301 Single Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839310 Double Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839521 Cable Railing LF x = $ -
8395XX Terminal System (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
839585 Alternative Flared Terminal System EA x = $ -
839584 Alternative In-line Terminal System EA x = $ -
498052 60" CIDH Concrete Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ - 839XXX Crash Cushion (Insert Type) EA x = $ -
520103 Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall) LB x = $ - 510060 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall CY x = $ -
833088 Tubular Handrailing LF x = $ -
513553 Retaining Wall (Masonry Wall) SQFT x = $ -
511035 Architectural Treatment SQFT x = $ -
598001 Anti-Graffiti Coating SQFT x = $ -
203070 Rock Stain SQFT x = $ -
5136XX Reinforced Concrete Crib Wall (Type X) SQFT x = $ - 839543 Transition Railing (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
597601 Prepare and Stain Concrete SQFT x = $ -
839561 Rail Tensioning Assembly EA x = $ -
83958X End Anchor Assembly (Type X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Relocate Fire Hydrant EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
XXXXXX Adjust Utilities to Grade EA 7 x 3,000.00 = $ 21,000 3-Sewer MH & 4-Water Valves $ 32,500

TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS

TOTAL SPECIALTY ITEMS
4 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Biological Mitigation LS x = $ -
130670 Temporary Reinforced Silt Fence LF 350 x 15.00 = $ 5,250 141000 Temporary Fence (Type ESA) LF x = $ -
Subtotal Environmental Mitigation $ 5,250
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
20XXXX Highway Planting LS 1 x 160,000.00 = $ 160,000
20XXXX Irrigation System LS 1 x 80,000.00 = $ 80,000
204099 Plant Establishment Work LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 20XXXX Relocate City Sign/Artwork LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 20XXXX Maintain Existing (Irrigation or Planted Areas) LS x = $ - 200114 Rock Blanket SQFT 6,500 x 50.00 = $ 325,000
200111 Decorative Boulders EA 7 x 5,000.00 = $ 35,000
200122 Weed Germination SQYD x = $ -
208304 Water Meter EA x = $ -
2087XX XX" Conduit (Use for Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ - Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation 700,000 $
5C - EROSION CONTROL
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
210010 Move In/Move Out (Erosion Control) EA 2 x 1,500.00 = $ 3,000 210350 Fiber Rolls LF 3,000 x 5.00 = $ 15,000
210360 Compost Sock LF x = $ -
2102XX Bioretention LS 1 x 30,000.00 = $ 30,000
21025X Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT/ACRE x = $ -
210300 Hydromulch SQFT 60,000 x 0.10 = $ 6,000
210420 Straw SQFT x = $ -
210430 Hydroseed SQFT 60,000 x 0.20 = $ 12,000
210600 Compost SQFT 60,000 x 0.25 = $ 15,000
210630 Incorporate Materials SQFT 60,000 x 0.50 = $ 30,000 Subtotal Erosion Control 111,000 $
5D - NPDES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
130300 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
130200 Prepare WPCP LS x = $ -
130100 Job Site Management LS 1 x 25,000.00 = $ 25,000
130330 Storm Water Annual Report EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130310 Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130320 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis Day EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130520 Temporary Hydraulic Mulch SQYD 5,600 x 2.00 = $ 11,200 130550 Temporary Hydroseed SQYD 5,600 x 2.00 = $ 11,200 130505 Move-In/Move-Out (Temporary Erosion Control) EA 2 x 2,500.00 = $ 5,000 130640 Temporary Fiber Roll LF 2,000 x 1.50 = $ 3,000
130900 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130710 Temporary Construction Entrance EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130610 Temporary Check Dam LF x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 10 x 350.00 = $ 3,500 130730 Street Sweeping LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000
Subtotal NPDES $ 153,900
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL $ 970,200
Supplemental Work for NPDES
066595 Water Pollution Control Maintenance Sharing* LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 066596 Additional Water Pollution Control** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 066597 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis*** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
Subtotal Supplemental Work for NDPS $ 20,000
*** Applies only to project with SWPPPs.
*Applies to all SWPPPs and those WPCPs with sediment control or soil stabilization BMPs. **Applies to both SWPPPs and WPCP projects.
5 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 6: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
860460 Lighting and Sign Illumination LS 1 x 200,000.00 = $ 200,000 860201 Signal and Lighting LS x = $ -
860990 Closed Circuit Television System LS x = $ -
86110X Ramp Metering System (Location X) LS x = $ -
86070X Interconnection Conduit and Cable LF/LS x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
5602XX Install Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
498040 XX" CIDHC Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ -
86080X Inductive Loop Detectors EA/LS x = $ -
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (Type X) LS x = $ -
15075X Remove Sign Structure EA x = $ -
151581 Reconstruct Sign Structure EA x = $ -
152641 Modify Sign Structure EA x = $ -
860090 Maintain Existing Traffic Management System Elements During Construction LS x = $ - 86XXXX Fiber Optic Conduit System LS x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 200,000
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
566011 Roadside Sign - One Post EA x = $ -
566012 Roadside Sign - Two Post EA x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign SQFT x = $ -
568016 Install Sign Panel on Existing Frame SQFT x = $ - 150711 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe LF x = $ -
141101 Remove Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe (Haz Waste) LF x = $ - 150712 Remove Painted Pavement Marking SQFT x = $ -
150742 Remove Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152320 Reset Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152390 Relocate Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
840502 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) LF x = $ - 846012 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) SQFT x = $ - 120090 Construction Area Signs LS 1 x 25,000.00 = $ 25,000 56XXXX Roadside Signs LS 1 x 30,000.00 = $ 30,000
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation LS 1 x 30,000.00 = $ 30,000 Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 85,000
6C - Traffic Management Plan
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
12865X Portable Changeable Message Signs LS 1 x $ 30,000 = $ 30,000 Subtotal Traffic Management Plan $ 30,000
6C - Stage Construction and Traffic Handling
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120199 Traffic Plastic Drum EA x = $ -
12016X Channelizer (Type X) EA x = $ -
120120 Type III Barricade EA x = $ -
129100 Temporary Crash Cushion Module EA x = $ -
120100 Traffic Control System LS x = $ -
129110 Temporary Crash Cushion EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Stage Construction LS 1 x 120,000.00 = $ 120,000 Subtotal Stage Construction and Traffic Handling $ 120,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 435,000
6 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 7: DETOURS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON x = $ -
26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
128601 Temporary Signal System LS x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
80010X Temporary Fence (Type X) LF x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
$ -
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 3,868,500 $
SECTION 8: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items 0.5% $ 19,343
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items 0.5% $ 19,343
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items 2.0% $ 77,370
Total of Section 1-7 $ 3,868,500 x 3.0% = $ 116,055
$ 116,100
SECTIONS 9: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
Item code
999990 Total Section 1-8 $ x 10% = 3,984,600 $ 398,460
$ 398,500
SECTION 10: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066670 Payment Adjustments For Price Index
Fluctuations LS x = $ -
066094 Value Analysis LS x = $ -
066070 Maintain Traffic LS x = $ -
066919 Dispute Resolution Board LS x = $ -
066921 Dispute Resolution Advisor LS x = $ -
066015 Federal Trainee Program LS x = $ -
066610 Partnering LS x = $ -
066204 Remove Rock and Debris LS x = $ -
066222 Locate Existing Crossover LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Cost of NPDES Supplemental Work specified in Section 5D = $ 20,000 Total Section 1-8 $ 3,984,600 5% = $ 199,230
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 219,300
Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal

TOTAL DETOURS

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS

TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
* Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal
7 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) SECTION 11: STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS AND EXPENSES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066105 Resident Engineers Office LS x = $0
066063 Traffic Management Plan - Public Information LS x = $0 066901 Water Expenses LS x = $0
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (X) LS x = $0
066841 Traffic Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066840 Traffic Signal Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066062 COZEEP Contract LS x = $0
066838 Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer LS x = $0
066065 Tow Truck Service Patrol LS x = $0
066916 Annual Construction General Permit Fee LS x = $0 XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $0
Total Section 1-8 $ 3,984,600 2% = $ 79,692
$79,700
SECTION 12: TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD
Total of Roadway and Structures Contract Items excluding Mobilization $3,984,600 (used to calculate TRO) Total Construction Cost (excluding TRO and Contingency) $4,682,100 (used to check if project is greater than $5 million excluding contingency) Estimated Time-Related Overhead (TRO) Percentage (0% to 10%) = 5% Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
090100 Time-Related Overhead WD 360 X $0 = $0
TOTAL TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD $0
SECTION 13: ROADWAY CONTINGENCY
Total Section 1-12 $ 4,682,100 x 25% = $1,170,525
TOTAL CONTINGENCY $1,170,600

TOTAL STATE FURNISHED
8 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
STRUCTURES MOBILIZATION 10%
Recommended Contingency: (Pre-PSR 30%-50%, PSR 25%, Draft PR 20%, PR 15%, after PR approval 10%, Final PS&E 5%) Total recommended percentages includes any quantified risk based contingency from the risk register.

STRUCTURES CONTINGENCY 10%

TOTAL COST OF STRUCTURES
Estimate Prepared By:

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) III. RIGHT OF WAY
Fill in all of the available information from the Right of Way Data Sheet.

A) A1) Acquisition, including Excess Land Purchases, Damages & Goodwill, Fees $ 30,000 TCEs A2) SB-1210 $ 0
B) Acquisition of Offsite Mitigation $ 0
C) C1) Utility Relocation (Local Agency Share) $ 0
C2) Potholing (Design Phase) $ 60,000
D) Railroad Acquisition $ 0
E) Clearance / Demolition $ 0
F) Relocation Assistance (RAP and/or Last Resort Housing Costs) $ 0 G) $ 0
H) Environmental Review $ 0
I) 0% $ 0
J) Design Appreciation Factor 0% $ 0
K) Utility Relocation (Construction Cost) $ 0
L)
M)
N)
1 When estimate has Support Costs only 2 When estimate has Utility Relocation 3 When R/W Acquisition is required Utility Estimate Prepared
By Utility Coordinator2
Phone
R/W Acquisition Estimate
Prepared By Right of Way Estimator3
Phone
$30,000
Title and Escrow
Condemnation Settlements
Note: Items G & H applied to items A + B

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
Support Cost Estimate
Prepared By Project Coordinator1
Phone
TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE: Escalated $40,000
RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $70,000
10 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project (N/B) DO NOT PRINT THIS SHEET AS PART OF COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT TO PROJECT INITIATION OR APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.

IV. SUPPORT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Run a Support Cost Estimate Summary report (D11 Project Management Support onramp) for component data.

Total by FY PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ <2016 Expended
ETC
2017 Expended
ETC
2018 Expended
ETC
2019 Expended
ETC
2020 Expended
ETC
2021 Expended
ETC
2022 Expended
ETC
2023 Expended
ETC $200,000 $200,000
2024 Expended
ETC $250,000 $250,000 $272,000 $250,000
2025 Expended
ETC $500,000 $521,000
2026 Expended
ETC $200,000 $70,000 $600,000 $218,000 $80,000 $679,000 2027 Expended
ETC $600,000 $679,000
2028 Expended
ETC
2029 Expended
ETC
2030 Expended
ETC
$450,000 $950,000 $70,000 $1,200,000 $2,670,000 $472,000 $989,000 $80,000 $1,358,000 $2,899,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escalated Risk Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Note: If you have already accounted fo

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$450,000 $950,000 $70,000 $1,200,000 Total Esc. Support Cost $472,000 $989,000 $80,000 $1,358,000 $2,899,000 -$450,000 -$950,000 -$70,000 -$1,200,000 -$2,670,000 $472,000 -$989,000 -$80,000 -$1,358,000 -$1,955,000

7.6% 16.1% 1.2% 20.4% 45.4% 8.0% 16.8% 1.4% 23.1% 49.3% Office Chief - Date
Project Control - Date
Overall Percent Support Cost: 49.28%
Total Capital Outlay Support Cost: $2,899,000
Total Capital Cost: $5,883,000
PRSM workplan hours/costs verified
against approved MWA:

Approved by:

EAC (Expended + ETC)
Approved Budget (PRSM)
Difference (Budget - EAC)
Support Ratio (EAC / Cap Cost)
Duration to mid-point component
Total including Risk Amount
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Support Escalation Rate
Unescalated-Risk Loaded Escalated (4.2% per year for ETC, effective 1/2/2018 ) $200,000
$522,000
$600,000
$200,000
$500,000
$500,000 $521,000
$977,000
$679,000
$870,000
EA: TBD PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
Dist-Cty-Rte: 01-LAK-29
PM: 41.2/41.6 1 of 11

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Current Year Cost Escalated Cost
$ 8,422,500 $ 9,930,000
$ - $ -
$ 8,422,500 $ 9,930,000
$ 40,000 $ 50,000
$ 8,463,000 $ 9,980,000
$ 750,000 $ 781,000
$ 1,600,000 $ 1,651,000
$ 100,000 $ 114,000
$ 1,600,000 $ 1,812,000
$ 4,050,000 $ 4,358,000
$ 12,550,000 $ 14,350,000
Programmed Amount
Month / Year
Date of Estimate (Month/Year) 2 / 2024
Estimated Construction Start (Month/Year) 3 / 2028
Number of Working Days = 360
Estimated Mid-Point of Construction (Month/Year) 12 / 2028 Estimated Construction End (Month/Year) 10 / 2029
Number of Plant Establishment Days 260
6/24/2024
6/30/2026
10/1/2027
12/1/2027
Spring 2028
Paul Curren, Engineer Date Phone
Kevin Ingram, City Manager Date Phone
Alternative :

Approved
RTL
PID Approval
PA/ED Approval
PS&E

PS&E SUPPORT

TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT
Approval Recommended
Begin Construction

TOTAL SUPPORT COST
Estimated Project Schedule

TOTAL PROJECT COST

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST

TOTAL ROADWAY COST
Type of Estimate :

PA/ED SUPPORT
Program Code :

Project Limits :

Preliminary Project Cost Estimate
TBD
Lakeport Boulevard Overcrossing
Intersection Improvements Project
Intersection Replacement, Multimodal Infrastructure Construction Project Description:

Scope :

TOTAL STRUCTURES COST

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
1 1 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
I. ROADWAY ITEMS SUMMARY
Cost
1 305,500$
2 2,621,500$
3 423,800$
4 174,000$
5 1,151,100$
6 670,000$
7 -$
8 160,400$
9 550,700$
10 295,400$
11 110,200$
12 275,400$
13 1,684,500$
$ 8,422,500
3/25/2024
Sean Charles, PE Date Phone
3/25/2024
Heather Anderson, PE Date Phone

TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
Estimate Prepared By :

By signing this estimate you are attesting that you have discussed your project with all functional units and have incorporated all their comments or have discussed with them why they will not be incorporated.

State Furnished
Section
Earthwork
Pavement Structural Section
Drainage
Specialty Items
Supplemental Work
Estimate Reviewed By :

Time-Related Overhead
Roadway Contingency
Environmental
Traffic Items
Detours
Minor Items
Roadway Mobilization
2 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY 6,000 x 30.00 = $ 180,000
152320 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
194001 Ditch Excavation CY x = $ -
198010 Imported Borrow CY x = $ -
192037 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 120 x 25.00 = $ 3,000 193013 Structure Backfill (Retaining Wall) CY 60 x 125.00 = $ 7,500 193031 Pervious Backfill Material (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 16010X Clearing & Grubbing LS 1 x 100,000.00 = $ 100,000 170101 Develop Water Supply LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 210130 Duff ACRE x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 305,500
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
401050 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement CY x = $ -
400050 Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement CY x = $ - 404092 Seal Pavement Joint LF x = $ -
404093 Seal Isolation Joint LF x = $ -
413117 Seal Concrete Pavement Joint (Silicone) LF x = $ - 413118 Seal Pavement Joint (Asphalt Rubber) LF x = $ -
280010 Rapid Strength Concrete Base CY x = $ -
410095 Dowel Bar (Drill and Bond) EA x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 6,240 x 180.00 = 1,123,200 $ 390137 Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) TON 590 x 260.00 = $ 153,400 395041 RHMA-O (Open Graded Fiction Course) TON 300 x 280.00 = $ 84,000 393006 Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer (Paving Grid) SQYD 9,530 x 14.00 = $ 133,420 260203 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 2,200 x 90.00 = $ 198,000 290201 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
374002 Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat) TON x = $ -
397005 Tack Coat TON 4 x 1,500.00 = $ 6,000
390100 Prime Coat TON x = $ -
377501 Slurry Seal TON x = $ -
3750XX Screenings (Type XX) TON x = $ -
374492 Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified) TON x = $ - 370001 Sand Cover (Seal) TON x = $ -
731530A Hot Mix Asphalt (Textured Paving) TONS x = $ -
730020 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 50 x 1,000.00 = $ 50,000 731504 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) CY 210 x 1,100.00 = $ 231,000 731519 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 16,000 x 25.00 = $ 400,000 731521 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 90 x 1,000.00 = $ 90,000 39407X Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type E) LF x = $ -
150771 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF x = $ -
420201 Grind Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
150860 Remove Base and Surfacing CY x = $ -
390095 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing CY x = $ -
15312X Remove Concrete LF/CY/LS x = $ -
394090 Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Miscellaneous Area) SQYD x = $ - 398200 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement (0.2') SQYD 7,620 x 20.00 = $ 152,400 39405X Shoulder Rumble Strip (HMA, X-In Indentations) STA x = $ - 413113 Repair Spalled Joints, Polyester Grout SQYD x = $ - 420102 Groove Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
390136 Minor Hot Mix Asphalt TON x = $ -
394095 Roadside Paving (Miscellaneous Areas) SQYD x = $ - XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 2,621,500

TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS

TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS
3 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
710132 Remove Culvert LF 280 x 80.00 = $ 22,400
150820 Modify Inlet EA x = $ -
155232 Sand Backfill CY x = $ -
15020X Abandon Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
152430 Adjust Inlet LF x = $ -
155003 Cap Inlet EA x = $ -
510501 Minor Concrete CY x = $ -
510094 Structural Concrete, Drainage Inlet CY 20 x 1,200.00 = $ 24,000 10 Ea G2 Inlets 5105XX Minor Concrete (Type XX) CY x = $ -
610112 24" Alternative Pipe Culvert LF 1,000 x 350.00 = $ 350,000 6411XX XX" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
65XXXX XX" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 6650XX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 68XXXX XX" Plastic Pipe (Edge Drain) LF x = $ -
69011X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Downdrain (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70321X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Inlet (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 710150 Remove Inlet EA 2 x 500.00 = $ 1,000
705315 24" Alternative Flared End Section EA 2 x 1,200.00 = $ 2,400 703233 Grated Line Drain LF x = $ -
72XXXX Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method) CY/TON x = $ - 72901X Rock Slope Protection Fabric (Class X) SQYD x = $ - 721420 Concrete (Ditch Lining) CY x = $ -
721430 Concrete (Channel Lining) CY x = $ -
750001 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB 2,400 x 10.00 = $ 24,000 10 Ea 24-12X Grates $ 423,800
SECTION 4: SPECIALTY ITEMS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
080050 Progress Schedule (Critical Path Method) LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 582001 Sound Wall (Masonry Block) SQFT x = $ -
510530 Minor Concrete (Wall) CY x = $ -
15325X Remove Sound Wall LF/LS x = $ -
141120 Treated Wood Waste LB x = $ -
153221 Remove Concrete Barrier LF 130 x 50.00 = $ 6,500 839752 Remove Guardrail LF 250 x 15.00 = $ 3,750
150668 Remove Flared End Section EA x = $ -
800361 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-6, Vinyl-Clad) LF 100 x 50.00 = $ 5,000 037001 Alternative Crash Cushion System EA 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 832005 Midwest Guardrail System LF x = $ -
839301 Single Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839310 Double Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839521 Cable Railing LF x = $ -
8395XX Terminal System (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
839585 Alternative Flared Terminal System EA x = $ -
839584 Alternative In-line Terminal System EA x = $ -
498052 60" CIDH Concrete Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ - 839XXX Crash Cushion (Insert Type) EA x = $ -
520103 Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall) LB 7,950 x 3.00 = $ 23,850 510060 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall CY 49 x 1,100.00 = $ 53,900 833088 Tubular Handrailing LF x = $ -
513553 Retaining Wall (Masonry Wall) SQFT x = $ -
511035 Architectural Treatment SQFT x = $ -
598001 Anti-Graffiti Coating SQFT x = $ -
203070 Rock Stain SQFT x = $ -
5136XX Reinforced Concrete Crib Wall (Type X) SQFT x = $ - 839543 Transition Railing (Type WB-31) EA x = $ -
597601 Prepare and Stain Concrete SQFT x = $ -
839561 Rail Tensioning Assembly EA x = $ -
83958X End Anchor Assembly (Type X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Relocate Fire Hydrant EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
XXXXXX Adjust Utilities to Grade EA 7 x 3,000.00 = $ 21,000 3-Sewer MH & 4-Water Valves $ 174,000

TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS

TOTAL SPECIALTY ITEMS
4 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Biological Mitigation LS x = $ -
130670 Temporary Reinforced Silt Fence LF 500 x 15.00 = $ 7,500 141000 Temporary Fence (Type ESA) LF 50 x 15.00 = $ 750 Subtotal Environmental Mitigation $ 8,250
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
20XXXX Highway Planting LS 1 x 200,000.00 = $ 200,000
20XXXX Irrigation System LS 1 x 100,000.00 = $ 100,000
204099 Plant Establishment Work LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 20XXXX Relocate City Sign/Artwork LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 20XXXX Maintain Existing (Irrigation or Planted Areas) LS x = $ - 200114 Rock Blanket LS 7,400 x 50.00 = $ 370,000
200111 Decorative Boulders EA 10 x 5,000.00 = $ 50,000
200122 Weed Germination SQYD x = $ -
208304 Water Meter EA x = $ -
2087XX XX" Conduit (Use for Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ - Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation 820,000 $
5C - EROSION CONTROL
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
210010 Move In/Move Out (Erosion Control) EA 2 x 1,500.00 = $ 3,000 210350 Fiber Rolls LF 3,000 x 5.00 = $ 15,000
210360 Compost Sock LF x = $ -
2102XX Bioretention LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000
21025X Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT/ACRE x = $ -
210300 Hydromulch SQFT 85,500 x 0.10 = $ 8,550
210420 Straw SQFT x = $ -
210430 Hydroseed SQFT 85,500 x 0.20 = $ 17,100
210600 Compost SQFT 85,500 x 0.25 = $ 21,375
210630 Incorporate Materials SQFT 85,500 x 0.50 = $ 42,750 Subtotal Erosion Control 157,775 $
5D - NPDES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
130300 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
130200 Prepare WPCP LS x = $ -
130100 Job Site Management LS 1 x 25,000.00 = $ 25,000
130330 Storm Water Annual Report EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130310 Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130320 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis Day EA 25 x 500.00 = $ 12,500 130520 Temporary Hydraulic Mulch SQYD 8,000 x 2.00 = $ 16,000 130550 Temporary Hydroseed SQYD 8,000 x 2.00 = $ 16,000 130505 Move-In/Move-Out (Temporary Erosion Control) EA 2 x 2,500.00 = $ 5,000 130640 Temporary Fiber Roll LF 3,000 x 1.50 = $ 4,500
130900 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130710 Temporary Construction Entrance EA 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 130610 Temporary Check Dam LF x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 10 x 350.00 = $ 3,500 130730 Street Sweeping LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000
Subtotal NPDES $ 165,000
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 1,151,100 $
Supplemental Work for NPDES
066595 Water Pollution Control Maintenance Sharing* LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 066596 Additional Water Pollution Control** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 066597 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis*** LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000 XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
Subtotal Supplemental Work for NDPS $ 20,000
*** Applies only to project with SWPPPs.
*Applies to all SWPPPs and those WPCPs with sediment control or soil stabilization BMPs. **Applies to both SWPPPs and WPCP projects.
5 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 6: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
860460 Lighting and Sign Illumination LS 1 x 300,000.00 = $ 300,000 860201 Signal and Lighting LS x = $ -
860990 Closed Circuit Television System LS x = $ -
86110X Ramp Metering System (Location X) LS x = $ -
86070X Interconnection Conduit and Cable LF/LS x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
5602XX Install Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
498040 XX" CIDHC Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ -
86080X Inductive Loop Detectors EA/LS x = $ -
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (Type X) LS x = $ -
15075X Remove Sign Structure EA x = $ -
151581 Reconstruct Sign Structure EA x = $ -
152641 Modify Sign Structure EA x = $ -
860090 Maintain Existing Traffic Management System Elements During Construction LS x = $ - 86XXXX Fiber Optic Conduit System LS x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 300,000
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
566011 Roadside Sign - One Post EA x = $ -
566012 Roadside Sign - Two Post EA x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign SQFT x = $ -
568016 Install Sign Panel on Existing Frame SQFT x = $ - 150711 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe LF x = $ -
141101 Remove Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe (Haz Waste) LF x = $ - 150712 Remove Painted Pavement Marking SQFT x = $ -
150742 Remove Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152320 Reset Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152390 Relocate Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
840502 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) LF x = $ - 846012 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) SQFT x = $ - 120090 Construction Area Signs LS 1 x 40,000.00 = $ 40,000 56XXXX Roadside Signs LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation LS 1 x 50,000.00 = $ 50,000 Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 140,000
6C - Traffic Management Plan
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
12865X Portable Changeable Message Signs LS 1 x $ 30,000 = $ 30,000 Subtotal Traffic Management Plan $ 30,000
6C - Stage Construction and Traffic Handling
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120199 Traffic Plastic Drum EA x = $ -
12016X Channelizer (Type X) EA x = $ -
120120 Type III Barricade EA x = $ -
129100 Temporary Crash Cushion Module EA x = $ -
120100 Traffic Control System LS x = $ -
129110 Temporary Crash Cushion EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Stage Construction LS 1 x 200,000.00 = $ 200,000 Subtotal Stage Construction and Traffic Handling $ 200,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 670,000
6 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 7: DETOURS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON x = $ -
26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
128601 Temporary Signal System LS x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
80010X Temporary Fence (Type X) LF x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
$ -
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 5,345,900 $
SECTION 8: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items 0.5% $ 26,730
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items 0.5% $ 26,730
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items 2.0% $ 106,918
Total of Section 1-7 $ 5,345,900 x 3.0% = $ 160,377
$ 160,400
SECTIONS 9: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
Item code
999990 Total Section 1-8 $ x 10% = 5,506,300 $ 550,630
$ 550,700
SECTION 10: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066670 Payment Adjustments For Price Index
Fluctuations LS x = $ -
066094 Value Analysis LS x = $ -
066070 Maintain Traffic LS x = $ -
066919 Dispute Resolution Board LS x = $ -
066921 Dispute Resolution Advisor LS x = $ -
066015 Federal Trainee Program LS x = $ -
066610 Partnering LS x = $ -
066204 Remove Rock and Debris LS x = $ -
066222 Locate Existing Crossover LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Cost of NPDES Supplemental Work specified in Section 5D = $ 20,000 Total Section 1-8 $ 5,506,300 5% = $ 275,315
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 295,400
Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal

TOTAL DETOURS

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS

TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
* Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal
7 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
SECTION 11: STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS AND EXPENSES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066105 Resident Engineers Office LS x = $0
066063 Traffic Management Plan - Public Information LS x = $0 066901 Water Expenses LS x = $0
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (X) LS x = $0
066841 Traffic Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066840 Traffic Signal Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066062 COZEEP Contract LS x = $0
066838 Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer LS x = $0
066065 Tow Truck Service Patrol LS x = $0
066916 Annual Construction General Permit Fee LS x = $0 XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $0
Total Section 1-8 $ 5,506,300 2% = $ 110,126
$110,200
SECTION 12: TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD
Total of Roadway and Structures Contract Items excluding Mobilization $5,506,300 (used to calculate TRO) Total Construction Cost (excluding TRO and Contingency) $6,462,600 (used to check if project is greater than $5 million excluding contingency) Estimated Time-Related Overhead (TRO) Percentage (0% to 10%) = 5% Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
090100 Time-Related Overhead WD 360 X $765 = $275,400
TOTAL TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD $275,400
SECTION 13: ROADWAY CONTINGENCY
Total Section 1-12 $ 6,738,000 x 25% = $1,684,500
TOTAL CONTINGENCY $1,684,500

TOTAL STATE FURNISHED
8 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
STRUCTURES MOBILIZATION 10%
Recommended Contingency: (Pre-PSR 30%-50%, PSR 25%, Draft PR 20%, PR 15%, after PR approval 10%, Final PS&E 5%) Total recommended percentages includes any quantified risk based contingency from the risk register.

STRUCTURES CONTINGENCY 10%
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
Bridge Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Bridge Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
Bridge 3
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
Bridge Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Bridge Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx TOTAL COST OF BRIDGES $0
TOTAL COST OF BUILDINGS $0
$0
$0
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0

TOTAL COST OF STRUCTURES
Estimate Prepared By:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ------ Division of Structures Date
$0
9 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
III. RIGHT OF WAY
Fill in all of the available information from the Right of Way Data Sheet.

A) A1) Acquisition, including Excess Land Purchases, Damages & Goodwill, Fees $ 40,000 TCEs A2) SB-1210 $ 0
B) Acquisition of Offsite Mitigation $ 0
C) C1) Utility Relocation (Local Agency Share) $ 0
C2) Potholing (Design Phase) $ 90,000
D) Railroad Acquisition $ 0
E) Clearance / Demolition $ 0
F) Relocation Assistance (RAP and/or Last Resort Housing Costs) $ 0 G) $ 0
H) Environmental Review $ 0
I) 0% $ 0
J) Design Appreciation Factor 0% $ 0
K) Utility Relocation (Construction Cost) $ 0
L)
M)
N)
1 When estimate has Support Costs only 2 When estimate has Utility Relocation 3 When R/W Acquisition is required $40,000
Title and Escrow
Condemnation Settlements
Note: Items G & H applied to items A + B

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
Support Cost Estimate
Prepared By Project Coordinator1
Phone
TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE: Escalated $50,000
RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $100,000
Utility Estimate Prepared
By Utility Coordinator2
Phone
R/W Acquisition Estimate
Prepared By Right of Way Estimator3
Phone
10 of 11 03/25/24

PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project
DO NOT PRINT THIS SHEET AS PART OF COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT TO PROJECT INITIATION OR APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.

IV. SUPPORT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Run a Support Cost Estimate Summary report (D11 Project Management Support onramp) for component data.

Total by FY PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ <2016 Expended
ETC
2017 Expended
ETC
2018 Expended
ETC
2019 Expended
ETC
2020 Expended
ETC
2021 Expended
ETC
2022 Expended
ETC
2023 Expended
ETC $400,000 $400,000
2024 Expended
ETC $350,000 $500,000 $381,000 $500,000
2025 Expended
ETC $1,000,000 $1,042,000
2026 Expended
ETC $100,000 $100,000 $800,000 $109,000 $114,000 $906,000 2027 Expended
ETC $800,000 $906,000
2028 Expended
ETC
2029 Expended
ETC
2030 Expended
ETC
$750,000 $1,600,000 $100,000 $1,600,000 $4,050,000 $781,000 $1,651,000 $114,000 $1,812,000 $4,358,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escalated Risk Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Note: If you have already accounted fo

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$750,000 $1,600,000 $100,000 $1,600,000 Total Esc. Support Cost $781,000 $1,651,000 $114,000 $1,812,000 $4,358,000 -$750,000 -$1,600,000 -$100,000 -$1,600,000 -$4,050,000 $781,000 -$1,651,000 -$114,000 -$1,812,000 -$2,796,000

8.9% 18.9% 1.2% 18.9% 47.9% 9.2% 19.5% 1.3% 21.4% 51.5% Office Chief - Date
Project Control - Date
$1,042,000
$1,129,000
$906,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$400,000
$850,000
$1,000,000
Unescalated-Risk Loaded Escalated (4.2% per year for ETC, effective 1/2/2018 ) $400,000
$881,000
PRSM workplan hours/costs verified
against approved MWA:

Approved by:

EAC (Expended + ETC)
Approved Budget (PRSM)
Difference (Budget - EAC)
Support Ratio (EAC / Cap Cost)
Duration to mid-point component
Total including Risk Amount
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Support Escalation Rate
Overall Percent Support Cost: 51.49%
Total Capital Outlay Support Cost: $4,358,000
Total Capital Cost: $8,463,000
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT D

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL

INVESTIGATION
1 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

NOTES TO SUPPORT NEPA PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
City of Lakeport
SR-29 and Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The SR-29 and Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project (project) involves construction of a six-legged roundabout at Lakeport Boulevard that includes the Bevins Road intersection and the SR-29 NB ramps intersection, as well as a four-legged roundabout at Lakeport Boulevard at the SR-29 SB ramps intersection. The roundabouts would be designed to accommodate future growth to the year 2050 (twenty years beyond build year). Intersection geometrics and pedestrian crossings would be consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672 entitled “Roundabouts: An Information Guide, 2nd Edition” (Guide) and reviewed against the latest NCHRP Research Report 1043 entitled “Guide for Roundabouts” as appropriate.
2 A 10-foot shared-use path would convey pedestrian and bicycle traffic through the intersections and provide the opportunity for cyclists to exit bicycle lanes via a bicycle ramp and navigate the intersection on the shared-use path and through the crosswalks. Cyclists would also have the option to continue in the roadway, sharing the lane with vehicle traffic through the roundabout. Crosswalks would be split into two separate crossings through the provision of the pedestrian refuges at the splitter islands. These two-stage crossings would reduce the amount of sustained time a pedestrian is in potential conflict with motorized vehicles by limiting the length of each crossing and limiting each crossing to one direction of vehicle travel at a time.

The project would include irrigated landscaping that utilizes plant material and mulch to establish an attractive landscape that would provide biological and water quality remediation (revegetation and bioswales), and adhere to safety requirements. The project would provide enhanced lighting to improve roadway visibility for drivers during nighttime hours as well as visibility of people bicycling and walking at intersection crossings. Lighting is anticipated to be installed at intersection conflict points along the shoulders of Lakeport Boulevard. Existing local guide signs and regulatory signs would likely be removed and replaced. Additional guide signs would be placed per the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD).

The roundabout on the west side of the interchange would require the construction of a retaining wall along the northwest quadrant between the Chevron station parcel and the exit ramp. The wall would be approximately 120 feet long with a maximum height of 6 feet. The type of wall will be further analyzed during PA/ED.

CONSTRUCTION
Construction would be phased to maintain local access to SR-29 and Lakeport Boulevard.

Construction lay down areas would be within the area between Bevins and the SR-29 ramps, or SR-29 ramps and mainline. Excavation would be required throughout the project to construct signing, drainage, retaining walls, lighting, landscaping, and utilities. Constructing the project may require relocation of the underground facilities, including electric, gas, sewer, water, and telecommunication lines. A maximum depth of five feet is anticipated. Erosion control measures would be implemented during the construction phase.

RIGHT OF WAY
The project could potentially require frontage acquisition and/or temporary construction easements for conforms/driveway work from approximately four parcels. Further evaluation of impacts and right of way needs will be analyzed during PA/ED. 3 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
GENERAL: The project would address capacity and safety concerns along Lakeport Boulevard.

The primary purpose of the proposed project is to maximize the existing infrastructure to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. Improving the existing interchange with roundabouts would reduce rear-end and hit object collisions due to the design configuration. The secondary purpose of this project is to improve operations, reduce delay, and enhance mobility for all travel modes at the interchange. The limits of the project provide a logical termini relative to the proposed. To date, the project has not generated public controversy.

NOISE: The proposed roundabouts would not significantly change the horizontal or vertical alignment or increase the number of through traffic lanes. There will be minor expansion to Bevins Street to the southeast of the intersection to accommodate an entry and exit from the roundabout, however, the project does not meet the definition of a Type 1 project as defined in 23 CFR 772.5(h). The project will generate typical construction noise and vibration due to minor excavation, the reconstruction of streets and sidewalks, and the necessary work to ensure proper utility access and installation. Construction activities necessary to complete the project will not require pile driving, structure demolition, blasting or other such construction techniques.

AIR QUALITY: The project is located within the Lake County Air Basin and is under the jurisdiction of the Lake County Air Quality Management District. Lake County is currently designated as attainment or unclassified for all federal and state ambient air quality standards.

The project consists of constructing roundabouts at two intersections, which is not a project type included in 40 CFR 93.123, Table 2, relative to exemption from project level conformity determination. However, the project is anticipated to be exempt from regional conformity analysis as an intersection channelization project.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE: A search of the Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites List (Cortese List) was completed to determine if there are any known hazardous waste facilities located on or adjacent to the project corridor. One open site, identified as New Lakeport Courthouse, was identified on property located southeast of the project corridor on the east side of Highway 29. Review of site documentation notes the presence of elevated concentrations of heavy metals and naturally occurring asbestos detected in soils due to the presence of serpentinite bedrock and fragments in the overlying fill material on the site.

WATER QUALITY/RESOURCES: The National Wetlands Inventory does not identify wetlands or other waters within or adjacent to the project site. The nearest creek, Forbes Creek, is located approximately one-half mile north of the project corridor, and Clear Lake is located approximately one-half mile to the east. Implementation of Best Management Practices as part of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would minimize any impacts to surface waters. The project is not located within a designated sole-source aquifer. 4 COASTAL ZONE: The project is not located within a State Coastal Zone, along the San Francisco Bay, or within Suisun Marsh.

FLOODPLAIN: The project is not located within a regulated floodplain.

WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS: The project is not located along a designated Wild and Scenic River.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: No occurrences of special-status plant or wildlife species have been recorded on the project site and there are no known vernal pools, wetlands, ponds, lakes, marshes, or riparian zones at the site. A search of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory for the project vicinity shows no potentially jurisdictional wetlands or waters in the project area.

No areas, such as critical habitat pursuant to the State or Federal Endangered Species Act, are mapped at the project site. No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan exists for the project area. Most of the project site is comprised of developed land, including paved roadway surfaces, sidewalk, and urban landscaping. The proposed project may potentially require removal of trees, which would be scheduled for removal during the non-nesting season and replaced in kind. Recorded occurrence of special status species were noted on property located southeast of the project corridor east of SR-29. Previously recorded species included special status plants, tricolored blackbird, and American badger. Additional study of federally listed threatened or endangered species will occur during PA/ED.

SECTION 4(F) AND 6(F): SR-29 in the project vicinity is a four-lane divided freeway. The project is located in a small urban/rural setting. Surrounding land uses include County administration buildings, Lake County Chamber of Commerce, a shopping center, car dealership, restaurants, gas station, and AAA branch. There are no known historic sites, publicly owned parks, recreation areas or wildlife refuges (Section 4[f]) within the proposed project area. Additionally, no known Section 6(f) properties are located within or adjacent to the proposed project area.

VISUAL RESOURCES: SR-29 is identified as an eligible State Scenic Highway but is not officially designated. Clear Lake is located approximately one-half mile east of the project area, however, the project would not impact associated scenic resources. A Visual Impact Assessment questionnaire was completed for the project. The questionnaire resulted in a total project score of 20, which indicates minor visual changes to the environment for which a Visual Impact Assessment Memorandum would be appropriate.

RELOCATION IMPACTS: No residential or business properties will be relocated as a part of the project.

5 LAND USE, COMMUNITY, AND FARMLAND IMPACTS: The project area west of SR-29 is located within census tract number 06033000300 and is identified as disadvantaged because it meets more than one burden threshold and the associated socioeconomic threshold. The project area east of SR-29 is located in census tract number 06033000400 and is identified as partially disadvantaged. It is surrounded by tracts that are disadvantaged but does not meet the adjusted low income threshold. The census tracts are not identified as minority populations.

While the census tracts are identified as disadvantaged, the project is not expected to disproportionately affect low income groups, as it is intended to improve the safety and functionality of the roadway for all users.

No permanent changes in access will occur and access from SR-29 would not be changed, with the exception of improvements to efficiently convey traffic safely through the interchange. The project will not encroach on state or federal lands, other than existing Caltrans right-of-way along SR-29. The project corridor is located on urban and built-up land, and no designated farmland is present in the project area.

CULTURAL RESOURCES: The project is not known to encroach on Tribal Land. The project will require screening by Caltrans district professionally qualified staff in order to determine if there are National Register listed or potentially eligible historic properties or archaeological resources within the construction area.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT E

BASIS OF DESIGN MEMO
Memorandum
12606482 1
January 25, 2024
To Victor Fernandez, City of Lakeport
Copy to Paul Curren
From Heather Anderson, GHD
Sean Charles, WMH
Tel 530-515-7948
Subject Basis of Design Memo for the
Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Project
Project no. 12606482
The City of Lakeport (City) proposes roadway improvements at the State Route (SR) 29 and Lakeport Blvd Interchange (Interchange) where intersections at the ramps and Bevins Street will be updated to improve safety and operations for all modes. The project consists of two proposed roundabouts, which includes the closely spaced Bevins Street access, as well as bicycle and pedestrian improvements.

This memorandum summarizes the assumptions that served as the basis for geometric design decisions of the roundabouts at the respective ramp intersections.

Design Basis
Based on input received from the City during preliminary project discussions, the following access will be perpetuated in the build alternative:
– Left in/out access for the shopping center between Bevins Street and Larrecou Lane – Pedestrian access on the north side of Lakeport Boulevard – Bicycle access on north side of Lakeport Boulevard
– Future bicycle access on south side of Lakeport Boulevard – Access to the Chamber of Commerce
– Future Kimberly Extension will be accommodated
Roundabout Design and Performance Criteria
The geometrics and roadway features defining the project were designed to satisfy the following design and safety performance criteria:
– Criteria and methodologies are to be consistent with Report 672 of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) titled Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (Second Edition). This document supersedes the original roundabout guide published by the FHWA in 2000. – The design vehicles agreed to with the City (further described below) shall be accommodated on all movements such that, per the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, 7th Edition (update May 2022) (HDM), the tractor portion of the vehicle does not need to mount any truck aprons and the bus does not need to mount any truck aprons.
– Per NCHRP Report 672, and section 405.10 of the HDM fast path entry speeds should be 25 mph or less on single lane roundabout approaches.
– Per the HDM, a domed or mounded central island between 3.5 to 6 feet high, is needed to focus attention on the approach and through roundabout alignment. – Minimum stopping sight distance for posted speed limits should be provided for vehicles approaching roundabout entrances (yield line) and pedestrian crosswalks per criteria in the HDM. – Minimum intersection sight distance should be provided for vehicles approaching roundabout entrances and circulating traffic.
12606482 2
– View angles for all legs of the roundabout should be equal to or greater than 75 degrees. – Entry angles for all legs of the roundabout should be between 16 and 40 degrees, 20-25 preferred. – Per HDM, since Bevins St and Lakeport Blvd (both 30 mph posted) are lower speed environments, the total length of the raised island should be at least 50 feet although 100 feet is desirable. – Per Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 82, and the HDM, all crossings need to be designed for both bicyclist and pedestrian needs and should be a minimum of 8 feet wide, 10 feet preferred. – Per NCHRP Report 834 and the HDM, a landscape buffer/strip detectable by cane and under foot and located between the sidewalk and the back of curb for the circular roadway of the roundabout should be a minimum of 2 feet wide, 3 feet preferred.
– Per HDM, a sidewalk should be included and have a minimum paved width of 8 feet, 10 feet preferred. – Per HDM, a minimum 2-foot horizontal clearance from the outside paved edge of the sidewalk to obstructions should be provided, 3 feet preferred.
– Per HDM, bicycle ramps are to be located to avoid being confused with curb ramps for pedestrians. – Per HDM, bicycle ramps should be placed at a 35 to 45 degree angle to the departure roadway to enable the bicyclists to use the ramp while discouraging entering the sidewalk at a high speed.

Vehicles
Maximum Circulating Vehicle
The maximum circulating vehicle, while potentially infrequent, shall allow for smooth unimpeded travel through the roundabout without mounting any raised features, vertical or rolled. In most cases, these vehicles are busses as mounting raised areas would cause significant discomfort to any riders. HDM 405.10(8) provides guidance on transit use of roundabouts, stating “… to minimize passenger discomfort, a roundabout should be designed such that the transit vehicle or bus does not use the truck apron.”.

According to the Caltrans Bus Maps, a 45’ motorcoach is permitted to use Route 29 in the project vicinity and thus, per HDM 404.4(4)(b) the interchange has been designed to accommodate this vehicle (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Bus 45
12606482 3
Design Vehicle
To be compliant with the Caltrans HDM 404.4(1)(b) and the Caltrans Truck Route Maps, the design vehicle for ramp intersection movements is an STAA (56’ Radius). In restrictive locations on minor city street movements (onto and from Bevins St), the minimum design vehicle is a Cal Legal (50’ Radius) Design Vehicle. The Cal Legal Design Vehicle was chosen for these restrictive locations to match the Car Carrier design vehicle that was utilized for the roundabout on the west side of SR 29 at Lakeport Boulevard and Parallel Drive, and to allow for potential future growth of the parcel south of the courthouse and near Kimberly Lane. The STAA design vehicle has been used wherever feasible, to maximize truck accessibility, only utilizing the Cal Legal Vehicle when it is not economically feasible to design for an STAA.

Figure 2: Car Carrier Truck
Figure 3: Cal Legal Truck
Figure 4: STAA
12606482 4
Accommodated Vehicle
An accommodated vehicle is one that the intersection is not necessarily designed for but can be accommodated in restrictive situations. Caltrans, in an effort to maintain access for oversized and overweight vehicles on the state highway system, has developed an oversized vehicle template that is the maximum vehicle legally permitted on the state highway with a permit. Accommodating this vehicle is atypical for many interchanges and intersections, however maximum effort is required to be made to accommodate where possible. This is especially important at interchanges with overcrossing structures (minor street crosses over the highway) as the minor street creates a vertical barrier in the path of a tall load. The project interchange in its current configuration does provide access for these vehicles.

Figure 5: Caltrans Oversized Overweight
To satisfy these requirements, the team proposes the use of oversized truck aprons, small raised textured paving that does not appear to be part of the intersection, but can be traversed by large trucks. The trucks would be required to be escorted by pilot cars so they may shut down the intersection temporarily while the truck proceeds in an unorthodox manner. Closing the intersection to provide safe access is normal for oversized loads at signalized and non-signalized intersections due to the infrequency of these occurrences and would be permitted/pre-planned with the agencies. Thus, it is unexpected to cause any significant impact to normal traffic operations.

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT F

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT & INTERSECTION

CONTROL EVALUATION
(TEPA-ICE)
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project i Route 29 & Lakeport
Blvd Interchange
Improvements Project
Draft Traffic Engineering Performance
Assessment & Intersection Control
Evaluation (TEPA-ICE)
WMH Corporation
March 27, 2024
The Power of Commitment
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project ii Contents

1. Introduction 1

1.1 Project Background 1

1.2 Purpose and Need 1

1.3 Study Intersections 2

1.4 Study Periods and Analysis Scenarios 4

2. Collision Analysis 4

3. Existing Conditions 5

3.1 Roadways 7

3.2 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities 7

3.2.1 Bicycle Facilities 7

3.2.2 Pedestrian Facilities 7

3.3 Transit Facilities 7

4. Analysis Policies and Methodologies 9

4.1 Level of Service (LOS) 9

4.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled 11

4.3 Key Technical Analysis Parameters and Assumptions 11

5. Traffic Operations 11

5.1 Traffic Volumes Forecasts 11

5.2 No Build Traffic Operations 16

5.2.1 Existing No Build Traffic Operations 16

5.2.2 2030 No Build Traffic Operations 17

5.2.3 2050 No Build Traffic Operations 17

6. Proposed Improvements 18

6.1 Roundabout Alternative Intersection Geometrics 19

6.1.1 Roundabout Alternative Fast Path 19

6.1.2 Vehicle Turn Movements 19

6.1.3 Natural Path Alignment 20

6.1.4 Sight Distance 20

6.1.5 Angle of Visibility 20

6.2 Roundabout Traffic Operations 20

6.2.1 2030 Roundabout Traffic Operations 20

6.2.2 Roundabout Year 2050 Build Conditions 21

7. Conclusion 22
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project iii Table Index
Table 2.1 Collisions – City Intersections 5
Table 4.1 Intersection Level of Service Criteria 10
Table 4.2 Technical Parameters & Assumptions 11
Table 5.1 Existing No Build Traffic Operations 16
Table 5.2 2030 No Build Traffic Operations 17
Table 5.3 2050 No Build Traffic Operations 18
Table 6.1 2030 Roundabout Traffic Conditions 21
Table 6.2 2050 Roundabout Traffic Operations 22
Figure Index
Figure 1.1 Vicinity Map 3
Figure 3.1 Existing Conditions 6
Figure 3.2 Lakeport Transit Routes & Bus Stops 8
Figure 3.3 Lakeport Transit Route 8 Bus Stops 9
Figure 5.1 Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, Lane Geometries, & Traffic Control 13 Figure 5.2 2030 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, Lane Geometries, & Traffic Control 14 Figure 5.3 2050 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, Lane Geometries, & Traffic Control 15 Figure 6.1 Fast Path Diagram 19
Appendices
Appendix A Turning Movement Counts
Appendix B Synchro and SimTraffic LOS and Queuing Reports Appendix C Sidra LOS and Queuing Reports
Appendix D Roundabout Alternative Exhibits

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 1

1. Introduction
The City of Lakeport has retained WMH and GHD to analyze and recommend roadway improvements at and around the State Route 29 (SR 29) & Lakeport Blvd Interchange. This Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment and Intersection Control Evaluation (TEPA-ICE) has been created to compile and present the findings of this analysis.

The project’s three study intersections are along Lakeport Boulevard at the SR 29 northbound (NB) Ramps, SR 29 southbound (SB) Ramps, and at Bevins Street. The existing intersection controls and roadway geometry result in poor traffic operation at these locations.

The City is considering converting the three stop-controlled intersections into two roundabouts. Therefore, there is a need to analyze the intersection alternatives to understand if modern roundabouts would be most beneficial and conform to Caltrans requirements for the ICE, which are contained in this report.

The intersections of Lakeport Boulevard at the SR 29 NB Ramps and Bevins Street are around 200 feet apart.

According to Chapter 504.3 of Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual (HDM), this is less than the required distance between intersections:

The minimum distance (curb return to curb return) between ramp intersections and local road intersections shall be 400 feet. The preferred minimum distance should be 500 feet.

To comply with this guidance, combining the two intersections into one intersection is preferred. A roundabout allows the two intersections to be combined into a single six-legged intersection. Per the city’s direction, a roundabout was the only alternative considered since the city does not have existing traffic signals within its limits. Therefore, it also does not possess equipment or trained personnel to maintain signals. For this same reason, the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard at the SR 29 SB Ramps will also only have the roundabout alternative analysed. It should be noted that the adjacent western intersection of Todd Road at Parallel Drive is less 500 feet from this location, which is under the HDM’s preferred minimum distance between ramp intersection and local road intersections.

During the development of this final TEPA/ICE, the existing (inactive) Vista Point Shopping Center was purchased by Tribal Health with the intent of creating a regional facility, which will draw traffic from all portions of Lake County. Any associated traffic impacts have not been included and will need to be analysed/approved separately.

1.1 Project Background
The proposed project would address poor traffic operation, delay, safety, and capacity concerns along Lakeport Boulevard in Lake County at the SR 29 NB and SB ramp intersections, including Bevins Road on the east. These improvements are identified as the SR 29 and Lakeport Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project (project). The City proposes to construct a six-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard, Bevins Road, and the SR 29 NB Ramps, as well as a second four-legged roundabout at the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and the SR 29 SB Ramps. This report evaluates these improvements to determine whether they adequately address poor traffic, delay, safety, and capacity concerns under existing and future conditions, consistent with ICE requirements.

1.2 Purpose and Need
There is a history of rear end, broadside, hit-object, and sideswipe at the project intersections. These collision types are typical for two-way stop-control intersections similar to the existing stop-controlled off-ramps at the Lakeport Boulevard interchange. Converting the existing interchange to roundabouts would reduce rear-end and hit object collisions due to the design configuration.

The primary purpose of the proposed project is to maximize the existing infrastructure to allow for traffic to safely travel through the interchange. The secondary purpose of this project is to improve operations, reduce delay, and enhance mobility for all travel modes at the interchange.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 2

1.3 Study Intersections
Three intersections were selected for evaluation in this study. The following briefly describes each study intersection:

The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and Bevins Street is composed of curb ramps at the northwest and northeast corners of the intersection with sidewalk segments that extend further west to the SR 29 SB Ramps and east to Vista Point Shopping Center. It has a crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern end of the intersection.

The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 NB Ramps is composed of curb ramps at the northwest and northeast corners of the intersection with sidewalk segments that extend further west across the overcrossing to the SR 29 SB Ramps and east to Bevins Street. There is a marked crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern leg of the intersection.

The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 SB Ramps is composed of curb ramps at the northwest and northeast corners of the intersection with a pedestrian refuge island in between to connect them. There are sidewalk segments that extend west to the roundabout at Todd Road and Parallel Drive and east along Lakeport Boulevard to Bevins Street. The study intersection also has a marked crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no pedestrian facilities located on the southern leg of the intersection.

Figure 1.1 on the following page shows the location of the study intersections and their surrounding areas.

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 1.1 - VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024

NB EXIT RAMP
NB ENTRANCE RAMP BEVINS St
BEVINS St

SB EXIT RAMP

SB ENTRANCE RAMP
PARALLEL Dr
TODD Rd
PARALLEL Dr
LAKEPORT Blvd
STUDY INTERSECTIONS LARRECOU Ln
WESTSIDE PARK Rd
BROTEN Ct

EDITH WAY
KONOCTI Ave FORBES St
MAIN St
ROYAL Ave
K St
LUPOYOMA Cir
KIMBERLY Ln
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 4

1.4 Study Periods and Analysis Scenarios
Study Periods
Weekday AM and PM peak hours were analyzed for the study intersections.

Analysis Scenarios
The study intersections will be analyzed using no build/build scenarios for the following analysis periods in the TEPAICE.

1. Existing Year (2020)

2. Opening Year (2030)

3. Design Year (2050)
Existing traffic volumes from the Lakeport Hub study were used for this project. These traffic counts were collected on Wednesday, February 26, 2020 for the New Lakeport Courthouse Traffic study and were approved by the City for use in this analysis to account for construction of the courthouse. Based on direction from the City, and to be conservative as a potential secondary route, all courthouse trips have been routed to access the courthouse via the south Bevins intersection leg.

2. Collision Analysis
The most recent five years of available collision data were reviewed to identify safety concerns in the project area. A total of 6 collisions were reported in the project area according to data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) from 2018 through 2022. While this is a relatively small number of overall collisions, analysis of the contributing factors and behaviors involved in the collisions were considered in the development of improvement alternatives at the study intersection.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 5 Table 2.1: Collisions – City Intersections
Primary Road Secondary Road
Severity Year Total Collisions (2018-2022) Fatal Injury (Severe) Injury (Other Visible) Injury (Complaint of Pain) Property Damage Only 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Lakeport Blvd SR 29 SB Ramps 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lakeport Blvd SR 29 NB Ramps 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 1 1 0 5
Lakeport Blvd Bevins St 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), 2023.

3. Existing Conditions
The following sections describe the roadway network, active transportation facilities, and transit services within the study area as they relate to the project’s study intersections.

The project is located in southern Lakeport. The SR 29/Lakeport Boulevard interchange is the southernmost access point to SR 29 in the city. There are agriculture, commercial, open space, and residential land uses surrounding the project area. See figure 3.1 for the existing conditions of the project area.

SB EXIT RAMP

SB ENTRANCE RAMP
PARALLEL Dr
TODD Rd
PARALLEL Dr
LAKEPORT Blvd
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 3.1 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024

NB EXIT RAMP
NB ENTRANCE RAMP BEVINS St
BEVINS St
LARRECOU Ln
WESTSIDE PARK Rd
BROTEN Ct

EDITH WAY
KONOCTI Ave FORBES St
MAIN St
ROYAL Ave
K St
LUPOYOMA Cir

FUTURE SITE OF

NEW LAKEPORT

COURTHOUSE

VISTA POINT

SHOPPING CENTER
KIMBERLY Ln
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 7

3.1 Roadways
Roadways that provide the primary vehicle circulation within the project area are SR 29, Lakeport Boulevard, and Bevins Street. The following are brief descriptions of the study area roadways.

Lakeport Boulevard is a roadway that acts as an east-west collector linking the city to the rest of the County and SR

29. In the vicinity of the project, Lakeport Boulevard consists of a two-lane roadway with striped medians and center left-turn lanes with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph).

3.2 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities

3.2.1 Bicycle Facilities
There are currently no Class I, II, III, or IV bicycle facilities within the study area.

3.2.2 Pedestrian Facilities
The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and Bevins Street has curb ramps at the northwest and northeast corners of the intersection with sidewalk segments that extend further west to the SR 29 NB Ramps and east to Vista Point Shopping Center. The study intersection also has a crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern leg of the intersection.

The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 NB Ramps has curb ramps at the northwest and northeast corners of the intersection with sidewalk segments that extend further west across the overcrossing of SR 29 and east to Bevins Street. The study intersection also has a marked crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no sidewalks, curb ramps, or marked crosswalks on the southern leg of the intersection.

The intersection of Lakeport Boulevard and SR 29 SB Ramps has sidewalk segments that extend west to the roundabout at Todd Road and Parallel Drive and east along Lakeport Boulevard to Bevins Street. The study intersection also has a marked crosswalk on the northern leg. There are no pedestrian facilities located on the southern leg of the intersection.

3.3 Transit Facilities
Transit services in the city of Lakeport are provided by the Lake Transit Authority. It currently has five routes that travel to or through Lakeport: Route 1, Route 4, Route 4a, Route 7, and Route 8. Routes 4, 4a, and 8 pass through the project area. The nearest bus stop to the study area is on the eastbound side of Lakeport Boulevard in front of 832 Lakeport Boulevard, which is approximately 450 feet northeast of the Lakeport Boulevard and Bevins Street intersection. All three of the bus routes that pass through the project area stop at this location, their routes are described below.
- Route 4 is a loop that runs every hour or every other hour from 6:00am to 5:00pm for 7 days a week. This route serves Clearlake and Lakeport, providing transportation between these communities.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 8 - Route 4a is a loop that runs WB at 9:16am, 11:20am, and 4:33pm and EB at 10:15am, 1:35pm, and 5:25pm from Monday to Friday. This route serves the communities of Soda Bay, Kit’s Corner, and Clearlake, providing transportation between these communities.
- Route 8 is a loop that runs every hour from 7:30am to 7:30pm for 7 days a week. This route serves Lakeport, providing stops at Lake County Jail, Sutter Lakeside Hospital, Safeway, City Hall, KMart, Mendocino College, and Konocti Vista Casino.

Figures 3.2 and 3.3 present the transit route, bus stops, and route transfer points near and adjacent to the project area.

Figure 3.2: Lakeport Transit Routes & Bus Stops

PROJECT

LOCATION
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 9 Figure 3.3: Lakeport Transit Route 8 Bus Stops

4. Analysis Policies and Methodologies

4.1 Level of Service (LOS)
Traffic operations are quantified through the determination of “Level of Service” (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” is assigned to an intersection, representing progressively worsening traffic operations as determined by vehicle delay or congestion. LOS “A” represents free-flow operating conditions and LOS “F” represents over-capacity stop-and-go conditions. These LOS letters correspond to numerical ranges of delay. LOS was calculated for all study intersection control types using the methods documented in the Transportation Research Board Publication Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition (HCM 6).

PROJECT

LOCATION
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 10 For signalized intersections, intersection delays and LOS are average values for all intersection movements. For twoway stop-controlled (TWSC) or minor street stop-controlled intersections, the intersection delays and LOS are represented by the worst approach leg. All signalized intersection operations analyses will be conducted using procedures and methodologies contained in HCM 6. For unsignalized/signalized control, the LOS was determined using Synchro 11 software (Version 11.1.2.9) by Trafficware. For roundabout control, the LOS was determined using Sidra 9 software using sidra analysis methodology. The model that will be used in the SIDRA analysis is the Akcelik M3 roundabout analysis model. All Synchro and SimTraffic LOS and Queuing Reports are included in Appendix B and all Sidra LOS and Queuing Reports are included in Appendix C.

The City of Lakeport General Plan sets a target LOS of C. Caltrans' Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies contains the following policy pertaining to the LOS standards within Caltrans jurisdiction:

Caltrans has transitioned away from LOS thresholds in favor of considering Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Caltrans' Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF) and Transportation Analysis Under CEQA (TAC) state that intersection improvement projects are "not likely to lead to a measurable and substantial increase in VMT and which therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis per OPR’s Technical Advisory." For these reasons, the City’s historic LOS C threshold will be applied to all study intersections. Table 4.1 describes the operational conditions for each LOS.

Table 4.1: Intersection Level of Service Criteria
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 11

4.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) has replaced LOS as the criterion used to evaluate transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California Code of Regulations (14 CCR §15064.3) states the following criteria for analyzing transportation impacts:
(2) Transportation Projects. Transportation projects that reduce, or have no impact on, vehicle miles traveled should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. For roadway capacity projects, agencies have discretion to determine the appropriate measure of transportation impact consistent with CEQA and other applicable requirements.

The Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street TEPA-ICE consists of improvements to the existing intersection and is not anticipated to have a meaningful impact on VMT. The improvements would not create a shorter route between any destinations as the overall roadway network remains unchanged and is therefore anticipated to have no aggregate impact on VMT.

4.3 Key Technical Analysis Parameters and Assumptions
The following assumption will be used in the ICE for potential improvement to the project’s three study intersections as part of the Route 29 and Lakeport Boulevard interchange improvements project:
- A travel speed of 25-50 mph will be used for SR 29 ramps and speeds on the local roadways will be based on current posted speed limits.

Table 4.2 presents the technical parameters assumed for the evaluation of the study intersections for the analysis scenarios. All parameters not listed should be assumed as default or calculated values based on HCM methodology.

These parameters were used in the preparation of the ICE.

Table 4.2: Technical Parameters and Assumptions
Technical Parameters Assumptions

1. Intersection Peak Hour Factor (PHF) Intersection overall, PHF of 0.92 used for AM and PM Peak Hours for all scenarios

2. Intersection Heavy Vehicle Percentage Intersection overall, minimum of 2% heavy vehicles used for AM and PM Peak Hours for all scenarios

5. Traffic Operations

5.1 Traffic Volumes Forecasts
In addition to existing conditions, the study intersections will be analyzed for Opening Year (2030) and Design Year (2050) conditions. The growth rate for traffic volumes was determined using the historic volumes for Bevins Street and Lakeport Boulevard from the 2025 Lakeport General Plan, Caltrans District 1 accepted growth factors, and discussions with the City on anticipated growth within the area by leg.

For both eastbound Lakeport Boulevard approaches along with the southbound Bevins Street approach, the General Plan volumes were used and have an average growth rate of 1.8% per year, which was linearly extrapolated to a 18% growth rate for 2030 and a 54% growth rate for 2050. For the northbound Bevins Street leg, in an effort to account for future development of the parcel south of the courthouse and near Kimberly Lane, and to be consistent with the growth used for the southbound and eastbound legs, a growth rate of 1.8% per year was used as well.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 12 For the westbound leg of Lakeport Boulevard & Bevins Street, as a pseudo full build-out scenario is to be assumed, a growth rate of 0.5% per year was used and linearly extrapolated to a 5% growth rate for 2030 and a 15% growth rate for 2050.

The Northbound and Southbound SR 29 Ramps were grown using the Caltrans District 1 growth factors of 2.3% per year. This was linearly extrapolated to a 22.5% growth rate for 2030 and a 67.5% growth rate for 2050.

For both the 2030 and 2050 traffic volumes, the new courthouse volumes were added to the Existing Conditions volumes before growth factors were applied. Lakeport Hub project volumes were added to the grown intersection volumes. Figures 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 below show existing, 2030, and 2050 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes respectively for the Lakeport Boulevard and Bevins Street project. 3 2 1
Project No.

Report No.

Date
Existing Conditions
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Lane Geometries & Traffic Control FIGURE 5.1
City of Lakeport
Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange
12606482
001
2/6/24 33 (46) Bevins St CrrrrrLrrrr
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 SB Ramps
SR-29 SB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd Bevins St/Lakeport Blvd rrL 128 (129) 0 (0) 178 (157) 134 (242) 2 (4) SR-29 SB Ramps CrrrrrArrrrr FrrrNrrrrr
0 (0) 103 (242) 36 (53)
172 (196) 227 (482) 187 (422)
103 (313) 0 (0) 4 (1)
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps rrrKrrE Lakeport Blvd Bevins St Orr
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd Q Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps 183 (287) 291 (299) 282 (307) 1 (2) 6 (6) 0 (0) 70 (145) Mrrr 48 (27) 31 (83) 0 (0)
rrrrBrrrrrD
61 (13)
rrMrrrrrD 0 (1) 280 (148) 228 (127) 9 (60)
Legend
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Lane Stop Sign C
3 2 1
Project No.

Report No.

Date
2030 Conditions
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Lane Geometries & Traffic Control FIGURE 5.2
City of Lakeport
Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange
12606482
001
2/2/24 39 (54) Bevins St CrrrrrLrrrr
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 SB Ramps
SR-29 SB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd Bevins St/Lakeport Blvd rrL 200 (213) 0 (0) 213 (189) 166 (302) 2 (5) SR-29 SB Ramps CrrrrrArrrrr FrrrNrrrrr
0 (0) 119 (277) 38 (56)
240 (279) 270 (566) 212 (470)
120 (360) 0 (0) 4 (1)
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps rrrKrrE Lakeport Blvd Bevins St Orr
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd Q Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps 275 (404) 354 (366) 345 (375) 1 (2) 7 (7) 0 (0) 134 (227) Mrrr 90 (73) 74 (138) 0 (0)
rrrrBrrrrrD
72 (15)
rrMrrrrrD 0 (1) 339 (180) 276 (156) 11 (71)
Legend
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Lane Stop Sign C
3 2 1
Project No.

Report No.

Date
2050 Conditions
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Lane Geometries & Traffic Control FIGURE 5.3
City of Lakeport
Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange
12606482
001
2/2/24 50 (70) Bevins St CrrrrrLrrrr
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 SB Ramps
SR-29 SB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps/Lakeport Blvd Bevins St/Lakeport Blvd rrL 255 (270) 0 (0) 285 (255) 225 (420) 5 (5) SR-29 SB Ramps CrrrrrArrrrr FrrrNrrrrr
0 (0) 150 (350) 40 (60)
295 (340) 335 (715) 245 (545)
150 (460) 0 (0) 5 (0)
Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps rrrKrrE Lakeport Blvd Bevins St Orr
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd Q Lakeport Blvd SR-29 NB Ramps 335 (490) 460 (465) 455 (495) 0 (5) 10 (10) 0 (0) 160 (280) Mrrr 110 (85) 85 (170) 0 (0) rrrrBrrrrrD 100 (20)
rrMrrrrrD 0 (0) 460 (250) 365 (200) 15 (100)
Legend
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Lane Stop Sign C
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 16

5.2 No Build Traffic Operations

5.2.1 Existing No Build Traffic Operations
Existing conditions present the analysis scenarios in which current operations at the study location are analyzed and establishes a baseline. No Build conditions assume that the current geometry and traffic control of the study intersections will remain unchanged.

Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified using existing traffic volumes and existing lane geometrics and controls. Table 5.1 presents the intersection operations and queue lengths for existing conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for the study intersections.

Table 5.1: Existing No Build Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour Intersection/Lane Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS
Delay
(s) LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue (ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC
C 26.1 D - - -
Eastbound C 3.3 A 0.187 66 100
Westbound C 0.1 A 0.004 16 25
Northbound C 26.1 D 0.085 27 25
Southbound C 14.6 B 0.220 61 25
PM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC
C 148.8 F - - -
Eastbound C 2.5 A 0.132 60 100
Westbound C 0.0 A - 11 60
Northbound C 148.8 F 0.875 45 25
Southbound C 18.9 C 0.437 154 25
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 14.1 B - - -
Eastbound C 1.6 A 0.063 40 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 14.1 B 0.420 89 40
Southbound C - - - - -
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 15.4 C - - -
Eastbound C 3.4 A 0.189 61 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 15.4 C 0.225 1394 40
Southbound C - - - - -
3 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 16.7 C - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 3.0 A 0.1 37 135
Northbound C - A - - -
Southbound C 16.7 C 0.473 94 600
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 129.7 F - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 5.8 A 0.294 63 135
Northbound C 9.4 A - - -
Southbound C 129.7 F 1.264 197 600
Notes:

1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control

2. LOS = LOS and Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds

5. - = Data not available
As presented in Table 5.1, the intersection of Lakeport Boulevard & Bevins Street currently operates at unacceptable LOS in all peak hours for existing conditions and the Lakeport Boulevard & SR 29 SB Ramps currently operate at an unacceptable LOS in the PM peak hour for existing conditions. Additionally, the existing 95th percentile queue lengths exceed available storage.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 17

5.2.2 2030 No Build Traffic Operations
The year 2030 was selected as the opening year for the project. Its weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified using the projected Year 2030 traffic volumes and existing intersection lane geometrics and control. Table 6.2 below presents the intersection operations during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2030 no build conditions.

Table 5.2: 2030 No Build Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour Intersection/Lane Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS
Delay
(s) LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue (ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC
C 40.4 E - - -
Eastbound C 3.4 A 0.232 61 100
Westbound C 0.1 A 0.004 13 60
Northbound C 40.4 E 0.161 27 25
Southbound C 18.9 C 0.374 98 25
PM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC

C OVR F - - -
Eastbound C 2.7 A 0.169 38 100
Westbound C 0.0 A 0.001 23 60
Northbound C OVR F 2.088 81 25
Southbound C 26.9 D 0.583 598 25
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 20.4 C - - -
Eastbound C 2.4 A 0.128 55 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 20.4 C 0.556 1754 40
Southbound C - - - - -
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 81.7 F - - -
Eastbound C 4.7 A 0.331 87 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 81.7 F 1.1 167 40
Southbound C - - - - -
3 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 32.8 D - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 2.8 A 0.111 45 135
Northbound C - - - - -
Southbound C 32.8 D 0.798 135 600
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC

C OVR F - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 6.2 A 0.397 95 135
Northbound C - - - - -
Southbound C OVR F 2.893 1996 600
Notes:

1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control

2. LOS = LOS and Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds

5. - = Data not available
As presented in Table 5.2, all study intersections are projected to operate at an unacceptable LOS in both peak hours for Year 2030 no build conditions except for Lakeport & SR 29 NB Ramps in the AM peak hour. Additionally, the 95th percentile queues exceed the available storage for Lakeport Boulevard & Bevins Street/SR 29 NB Ramps and Lakeport Boulevard & SR 29 SB Ramps.

5.2.3 2050 No Build Traffic Operations
The year 2050 was selected as the design year for the project. Its weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified using the Year 2050 traffic volumes and existing intersection lane geometrics and control.

Table 5.3 below presents the intersection operations during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2050 no build conditions.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 18 Table 5.3: 2050 No Build Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour Intersection/Lane Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS
Delay
(s) LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue (ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC
C 131.7 F - - -
Eastbound C 3.7 A 0.317 68 100
Westbound C 0.2 A 0.006 16 25
Northbound C 131.7 F 0.526 27 25
Southbound C 54.3 F 0.996 61 25
PM
Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St
TWSC

C OVR F - - -
Eastbound C 2.8 A 0.234 84 100
Westbound C 0.0 A - 20 25
Northbound C OVR F 28.533 243 25
Southbound C 82.9 F 1.199 2244 25
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC
C 49.7 E - - -
Eastbound C 2.4 A 0.167 52 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C 49.7 E 0.876 2287 40
Southbound C - - - - -
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps
TWSC

C OVR F - - -
Eastbound C 6.3 A 0.504 165 145
Westbound C 0.0 A - - -
Northbound C OVR F 1268.9 1903 40
Southbound C - - - - -
3 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC
C 150.7 F - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 3.0 A 0. 48 135
Northbound C - - - - -
Southbound C 150.7 F 1.461 337 600
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
TWSC

C OVR F - - -
Eastbound C 0.0 A - - -
Westbound C 8.2 A 0.566 150 135
Northbound C - - - - -
Southbound C OVR F 9.558 2032 600
Notes:

1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control

2. LOS = LOS and Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds

5. - = Data not available
As presented in Table 5.3, all study intersections are projected to operate at an unacceptable LOS in both peak hours for Year 2050 no build conditions. Additionally, the existing 95th percentile queues exceed the available storage for Lakeport Boulevard & Bevins Street, Lakeport Boulevard & SR 29 NB Ramps, and Lakeport Boulevard & SR 29 SB Ramps.

6. Proposed Improvements
The Build Alternative proposes to replace the existing study intersections with two modern roundabouts: a four-leg roundabout will replace the existing intersection at Lakeport Boulevard & SR 29 SB Ramps, and a six-leg roundabout will replace the two intersections of Lakeport Boulevard with SR 29 NB Ramps and with Bevins Street. The following section describes the improvement assumptions made for our alternative at the intersections. We are proposing two roundabouts: A 4-leg roundabout to replace the current two-way stop-control (TSWC) intersection at Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB ramps and a 6-leg roundabout that will accommodate traffic for the Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB ramps and Lakeport Blvd & Bevins St intersections. As discussed in the introduction, signalized intersections were not analyzed in this study because the city does not own any signals and does not have equipment or personnel to maintain them.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 19

6.1 Roundabout Alternative Intersection Geometrics

6.1.1 Roundabout Alternative Fast Path
The “Fastest Path” represents the path that the most aggressive drivers could take through the roundabout and assumes no other traffic to be within the intersection. The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672 indicates that the recommended maximum vehicle entry speeds along the fastest path should be less than 30 mph at multi-lane roundabout approaches and less than 25 mph on single-lane approaches. NCHRP Report 672 also indicates that the differential speed between consecutive or conflicting projected speeds should be less than 15 mph.

As shown in Figure 6.1, fastest path speeds are determined for five critical locations, per approach. These include entry speeds (R1); through movement circulating speeds (R2); exiting speeds (R3); left turn movement circulating speeds (R4); and right turn speeds (R5). The projected fast paths and corresponding fast path speeds for each approach are shown in Appendix D.

Figure 6.1: Fast Path Diagram

6.1.2 Vehicle Turn Movements
The maximum circulating vehicle, while potentially infrequent, shall allow smooth unimpeded travel through the roundabout without mounting any raised features, vertical or rolled. In most cases, these vehicles are buses and mounting raised areas would cause significant discomfort to any riders. HDM 405.10(8) provides guidance on transit use of roundabouts, stating “… to minimize passenger discomfort, a roundabout should be designed such that the transit vehicle or bus does not use the truck apron.” According to the Caltrans Bus Maps, a 45’ motorcoach is permitted to use Route 29 in the project vicinity and thus, per HDM 404.4(4)(b) the interchange has been designed to accommodate this vehicle.

To be compliant with the Caltrans HDM 404.4(1)(b) and the Caltrans Truck Route Maps, the design vehicle for ramp intersection movements is an STAA truck (56’ Radius). In restrictive locations on minor city street movements (onto and from Bevins St), the minimum design vehicle is a Cal Legal truck (50’ Radius) Design Vehicle. The Cal Legal Design Vehicle was chosen for these restrictive locations to match the Car Carrier design vehicle that was utilized for the roundabout on the west side of SR 29 at Lakeport Boulevard and Parallel Drive, and to allow for potential future growth of the parcel south of the courthouse and near Kimberly Lane. The STAA design vehicle has been used wherever feasible, to maximize truck accessibility, only utilizing the Cal Legal Vehicle when it is not feasible to design for an STAA.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 20 An accommodated vehicle is one that the intersection is not necessarily designed for but can traverse the intersection in restrictive situations. Caltrans, in an effort to maintain access for oversized and overweight vehicles on the state highway system, has developed an oversized vehicle template that is the maximum vehicle legally permitted on the state highway with a permit. Accommodating this vehicle is atypical for many interchanges and intersections, however maximum effort is required to be made to accommodate where possible. This is especially important at interchanges with overcrossing structures (minor street crosses over the highway) as the minor street can create a vertical barrier in the path of a over height permit load. The project interchange in its current configuration does provide access for these vehicles.

Appendix D shows the projected truck turn exhibits for our maximum circulating, design, and accommodated vehicles.

6.1.3 Natural Path Alignment
The "Natural Path" is the path that drivers will comfortably and naturally steer their vehicle through the roundabout, assuming that other traffic is also present in the intersection. Determining natural paths is particularly important on circulating areas of roundabouts when considering the potential for path overlap problems. In order for most drivers to drive a fluid and natural path, the potential for path overlap, consecutive curve radii and associated speeds should not differ drastically, and sufficient space should be provided for drivers to transition between reversing curves. Multilane roundabout approaches were designed with natural path in mind, lining drivers up prior to the yield line with their lane to eliminate path overlap issues.

6.1.4 Sight Distance
Intersection sight distance differs at roundabouts versus other intersection types. Drivers must be able to see potentially conflicting traffic from the left as they approach the roundabout entry. NCHRP Report 672 provides methodologies to establish the required sight distance triangles for conflicting traffic, as well as pedestrians in crosswalks, for both entering and circulating vehicle movements. Intersection Sight distances as well as other sight distances within or near the roundabout intersection were established using methodologies established within NCHRP report 672. Approach sight triangle lengths utilized the standard Caltrans stopping sight distances established by the HDM Table 201.1 for each leg’s applicable design speed.

6.1.5 Angle of Visibility
The angle between consecutive entries must not be overly acute in order to allow drivers to comfortably turn their heads to the left to view oncoming traffic from the adjacent upstream entry and circulatory roadway. Guidance from the NCHRP Section 6.7.4 recommends a minimum 75-degree intersection angle. All angles of visibility exceed the minimum acceptable value of 75 degrees.

6.2 Roundabout Traffic Operations

6.2.1 2030 Roundabout Traffic Operations
For the build condition, Year 2030 weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified utilizing the projected Year 2030 traffic volumes and the roundabout alternative intersection lane geometrics and control. Table 6.1 below presents the intersection operations for the roundabout alternative during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2030 build conditions.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 21 Table 6.1: 2030 Roundabout Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour Intersection/Lane Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS Delay LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue
(ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd &SR 29 NB Ramps/Bevins St
RNDBT
C 9.4 A - - -
Eastbound C 7.9 A 0.4 84 -
Westbound C 7.6 A 0.334 55 270
Northbound C 14.5 B 0.036 6 500
Southbound C 7.5 A 0.153 24 390
Southwestbound C 13.2 B 0.564 127 1000
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps/Bevins St
RNDBT
C 11.0 B - - -
Eastbound C 8.2 A 0.517 131 -
Westbound C 13.3 B 0.696 206 270
Northbound C 16.8 B 0.155 25 500
Southbound C 11.7 B 0.403 84 390
Southwestbound C 12.3 B 0.391 68 1000
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
RNDBT
C 7.5 A - - -
Eastbound C 6.3 A 0.387 67 -
Westbound C 5.8 A 0.289 - 390
Southbound C 9.9 A 0.455 76 180
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
RNDBT
C 11.6 B - - -
Eastbound C 14.6 B 0.725 230 -
Westbound C 7.1 A 0.513 - 390
Southbound C 14.8 B 0.553 122 180
Notes:

1. RNDBT = Roundabout

2. LOS = Delay based on average of all approaches for RNDBT

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds

5. - = Data not available
As presented in Table 6.1, the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS for build conditions in both AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all the 95th percentile queue lengths are within the available storage.

6.2.2 Roundabout Year 2050 Build Conditions
For the build condition, Year 2050 weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified utilizing the Year 2050 traffic volumes and the roundabout alternative intersection lane geometrics and control. Table

6.2 below presents the intersection operations for the roundabout alternative during the weekday AM and PM peak hours.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 22 Table 6.2: 2050 Roundabout Traffic Operations
#
Peak
Hour Intersection/Lane Movement
Control
Type1,2
Target
LOS Delay LOS
Degree of
Saturation
V/C Ratio
95th
Percentile
Queue
(ft)
Storage
(ft)
1 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps/Bevins St
RNDBT
C 13.3 B - - -
Eastbound C 7.8 A 0.5 101 -
Westbound C 9.1 A 0.415 77 270
Northbound C 20.7 C 0.074 14 500
Southbound C 7.9 A 0.207 36 390
Southwestbound C 24.0 C 0.807 325 1000
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps/Bevins St
RNDBT
C 17.0 B - - -
Eastbound C 8.2 A 0.566 157 -
Westbound C 23.7 C 0.847 383 270
Northbound C 23.3 C 0.295 56 500
Southbound C 24.8 C 0.651 221 390
Southwestbound C 18.5 B 0.578 147 1000
2 AM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
RNDBT
C 8.8 A - - -
Eastbound C 7.4 A 0.484 96 -
Westbound C 5.8 A 0.278 0 390
Southbound C 12.2 B 0.592 137 180
PM
Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps
RNDBT
C 15.9 B - - -
Eastbound C 23.5 C 0.848 385 -
Westbound C 7.2 A 0.459 0 390
Southbound C 19.5 B 0.668 196 180
Notes:

1. RNDBT = Roundabout

2. LOS = Delay based on average of all approaches for RNDBT

3. Bold = Unacceptable Conditions

4. OVR = Delay over 300 seconds
As presented in Table 6.2, the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS for roundabout build conditions in the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all the 95th percentile queue lengths are within the available storage except for the WB left/thru/right movement at Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 NB Ramps/Bevins St and the SB left/thru/right movement at Lakeport Blvd & SR 29 SB Ramps.

7. Conclusion
Based on the preliminary design and operational analysis, modern roundabouts are the ideal alternative compared to no build conditions. They will provide acceptable traffic operations that meet City and State LOS preferred policies as the current intersections will not provide acceptable operations in the Opening Year (2030) or Design Year (2050). In addition, the ideal alternative would enhance safety for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians and not require any major changes to the Lakeport overcrossing at SR 29.

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 23 Appendix A
Turning Movement Counts

I
!
"'
Westside Park Road
~ ....
"<,
&
~
~
.;
~
"'
-~
a:,
Source: RBF Consulting (2010)
City of Lakeport
0 "' <=
a,
...J
j
Martin Street
Lakeport Boulevard
Kimberly Lane
Campbell Lane
Industrial Avenue
1250 FT
.
1/---- s;
~---------
LEGEND
0 Intersection Analyzed
xx = AM Peak Hour Volumes
2500 FT
- APPROXIMATE
PARALLEL/LAKEPORT I SR 29 SB RAMP / LAKEPORT

PARALLEL DR
'- 0
;r;__ 1;:~,-I ,-.. oo- -o
) J' ,4 LAKEPORT BLVD

0.../ "tr o- 000 I 1-
0' O '-. I SR29SB RAMP
SR 29 NB RAMP / LAKEPORT I BEVINS/ LAKEPORT

BEVINS STREET
SR29NBRAMP I '-.. 1 '- 0 -4 00N -s
JJ, ,o LAKEPORT BLVD LAKEPORT BLVD
--- 0 .../ I "tr 0 .../ "tr 1a- O0N so- 000 "' o, I

LARRECOU/LAKEPORT MAIN/ LAKEPORT

LARRECOULN MAIN ST
'-o '-o 000 -o N00 -o
JJ, 1,3 ) J' ,o LAKEPORT BLVD KST
0 .../ "tr LAKEPORT
1 BL~ "tr a- IO0- a- -oo
52 '-. o,

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

LAKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE TIA
~. I.~~'"~' Project Trip Assign::~:

GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 24 Appendix B
Synchro and SimTraffic LOS and Queuing
Reports

HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 276 345 72 4 212 38 11 1 7 39 2 166
Future Vol, veh/h 276 345 72 4 212 38 11 1 7 39 2 166
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 60 - 25 - - 25 - - 25
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 300 375 78 4 230 41 12 1 8 42 2 180
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 271 0 0 453 0 0 1364 1293 414 1257 1291 230 Stage 1 - ----- 1014 1014 - 238 238 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 350 279 - 1019 1053 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1292 - - 1108 - - 125 163 638 148 163 809 Stage 1 - - - - - - 288 316 - 765 708 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 666 680 - 286 303 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1292 - - 1108 - - 79 125 638 119 125 809 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 79 125 - 119 125 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 221 243 - 588 705 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 514 677 - 216 233 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.4 0.1 40.4 18.9

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 81 638 1292 - - 1108 - - 119 809
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.161 0.012 0.232 - - 0.004 - - 0.374 0.223 HCM Control Delay (s) 57.8 10.7 8.6 - - 8.3 - - 52.3 10.7 HCM Lane LOS F B A - - A - - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 0.9 - - 0 - - 1.5 0.9
HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 134 354 0 0 270 119 90 0 339 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 134 354 0 0 270 119 90 0 339 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 145 - - - - - - - 40 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 146 385 0 0 293 129 98 0 368 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 422 0 - - - 0 1035 1099 385
Stage 1 - - - - - - 677 677 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 358 422 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 ----- 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 ----- 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - 0 0 - - 257 212 663
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 505 452 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 707 588 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - - - - 224 0 663
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 224 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 440 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 707 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0 20.4

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 224 663 1137 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.437 0.556 0.128 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 33 17 8.6 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 3.4 0.4 - - -
HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 275 74 120 240 0 0 0 0 213 0 200
Future Vol, veh/h 0 275 74 120 240 0 0 0 0 213 0 200
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 135 - - - - - - - 600
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 299 80 130 261 0 0 0 0 232 0 217
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 379 0 0 860 900 261
Stage 1 - - - - - - 521 521 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 339 379 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1179 - 0 326 278 778
Stage 1 0 - - - -0 596 532 -
Stage 2 0 - - - -0 722 615 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1179 - - 290 0 778
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 290 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 596 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 643 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.8 32.8

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1179 - 290 778
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.111 - 0.798 0.279
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.4 - 52.8 11.4
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 - 6.4 1.1
HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 42.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 156 375 15 1 470 56 71 2 7 54 5 302
Future Vol, veh/h 156 375 15 1 470 56 71 2 7 54 5 302
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 60 - 25 - - 25 - - 25
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 170 408 16 1 511 61 77 2 8 59 5 328
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 572 0 0 424 0 0 1466 1330 416 1274 1277 511 Stage 1 - - - - - - 756 756 - 513 513 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 710 574 - 761 764 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1001 - - 1135 - - 106 155 637 144 166 563 Stage 1 - - - - - - 400 416 - 544 536 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 424 503 - 398 413 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1001 - - 1135 - - ~ 37 128 637 122 138 563 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 37 128 - 122 138 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 332 345 - 452 535 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 175 502 - 324 343 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0 $ 667.5 26.9

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 38 637 1001 - - 1135 - - 123 563
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.088 0.012 0.169 - - 0.001 - - 0.521 0.583 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 730.5 10.7 9.3 - - 8.2 - - 62.5 19.9 HCM Lane LOS F B A - - A - - F C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 8.6 0 0.6 - - 0 - - 2.5 3.7
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 227 366 0 0 566 277 73 1 180 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 227 366 0 0 566 277 73 1 180 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 145 - - - - - - - 40 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 247 398 0 0 615 301 79 1 196 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 916 0 - - - 0 1658 1808 398
Stage 1 - - - - - - 892 892 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 766 916 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 ----- 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 ----- 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 745 - 0 0 - - 107 79 652
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 400 360 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 459 351 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 745 - - - - - ~ 71 0 652
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 71 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 267 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 459 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 4.7 0 81.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 71 652 745 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.133 0.3 0.331 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 249.1 12.9 12.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS F B B - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 6.1 1.3 1.5 - - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Opening Year Conditions
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 121
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 404 138 360 279 0 0 0 0 189 0 213
Future Vol, veh/h 0 404 138 360 279 0 0 0 0 189 0 213
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 135 - - - - - - - 600
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 439 150 391 303 0 0 0 0 205 0 232
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 589 0 0 1599 1674 303
Stage 1 - ----- 1085 1085 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 514 589 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 986 - 0 ~ 117 95 737
Stage 1 0 - - - -0 324 293 -
Stage 2 0 - - - -0 600 495 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 986 - - ~ 71 0 737
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- ~ 71 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 324 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 362 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 6.2 $ 466.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 986 - 71 737
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.397 - 2.893 0.314
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11 -$ 979.2 12.1
HCM Lane LOS - - B - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.9 - 20.6 1.3
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 365 455 100 5 245 40 15 0 10 50 5 225 Future Vol, veh/h 365 455 100 5 245 40 15 0 10 50 5 225 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 60 - 25 - - 25 - - 25
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 397 495 109 5 266 43 16 0 11 54 5 245
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 309 0 0 604 0 0 1767 1663 550 1625 1674 266 Stage 1 - ----- 1344 1344 - 276 276 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 423 319 - 1349 1398 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 - - 974 - - 65 97 535 82 95 773 Stage 1 - - - - - - 187 220 - 730 682 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 609 653 - 186 207 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 - - 974 - - 31 66 535 60 65 773 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 31 66 - 60 65 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 128 150 - 499 679 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 411 650 - 124 141 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 0.2 131.7 54.3

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 31 535 1252 - - 974 - - 60 773
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.526 0.02 0.317 - - 0.006 - - 0.996 0.316 HCM Control Delay (s) 211.6 11.9 9.2 - - 8.7 - - 228.2 11.8 HCM Lane LOS F B A - - A - - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 0.1 1.4 - - 0 - - 4.7 1.4
HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 17.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 160 460 0 0 335 150 110 0 460 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 160 460 0 0 335 150 110 0 460 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 145 - - - - - - - 40 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 174 500 0 0 364 163 120 0 500 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 527 0 - - - 0 1294 1375 500
Stage 1 - - - - - - 848 848 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 446 527 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 ----- 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 ----- 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 - 0 0 - - 179 145 571
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 420 378 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 645 528 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 - - - - - 149 0 571
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 149 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 350 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 645 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0 49.7

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 149 571 1040 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.802 0.876 0.167 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 88.2 40.5 9.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS F E A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.1 10 0.6 - - -
HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd AM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 58.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 335 85 150 295 0 0 0 0 285 0 255
Future Vol, veh/h 0 335 85 150 295 0 0 0 0 285 0 255
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 135 - - - - - - - 600
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 364 92 163 321 0 0 0 0 310 0 277
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 456 0 0 1057 1103 321
Stage 1 - - - - - - 647 647 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 410 456 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1105 - 0 ~ 249 211 720
Stage 1 0 - - - -0 521 467 -
Stage 2 0 - - - -0 670 568 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1105 - - ~ 212 0 720
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- ~ 212 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 521 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 571 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 3 150.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1105 - 212 720
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.148 - 1.461 0.385
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.8 - 273.9 13.1
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 - 18.5 1.8
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 793.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 200 495 20 0 545 60 100 5 10 70 5 420 Future Vol, veh/h 200 495 20 0 545 60 100 5 10 70 5 420 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 60 - 25 - - 25 - - 25
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 217 538 22 0 592 65 109 5 11 76 5 457
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 657 0 0 560 0 0 1839 1640 549 1583 1586 592 Stage 1 - - - - - - 983 983 - 592 592 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 856 657 - 991 994 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 931 - - 1011 - - ~ 58 100 535 88 108 506 Stage 1 - - - - - - 299 327 - 493 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 352 462 - 296 323 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 931 - - 1011 - - ~ 4 77 535 ~ 67 83 506 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 4 77 - ~ 67 83 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 229 251 - 378 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - ~ 34 462 - 218 248 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0 $ 12935.3 82.9

HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 4 535 931 - - 1011 - - 68 506
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 28.533 0.02 0.234 ----- 1.199 0.902
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 14166.1 11.9 10 - - 0 - - 277.5 48.2 HCM Lane LOS F B B - - A - - F E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 16.4 0.1 0.9 - - 0 - - 6.4 10.4
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 54.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 465 0 0 715 350 85 0 250 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 280 465 0 0 715 350 85 0 250 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 145 - - - - - - - 40 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 304 505 0 0 777 380 92 0 272 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 1157 0 - - - 0 2080 2270 505
Stage 1 - ----- 1113 1113 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 967 1157 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 ----- 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 ----- 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 604 - 0 0 - - ~ 59 40 567
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 314 284 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 369 271 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 604 - - - - - ~ 29 0 567
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 29 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 156 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 369 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 6.3 0 $ 334.7

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 29 567 604 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 3.186 0.479 0.504 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 1268.9 17.1 16.9 - - -
HCM Lane LOS F C C - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 11.1 2.6 2.8 - - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Design Year Conditions
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd PM Peak Hour
Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 533.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 490 170 460 340 0 0 0 0 255 0 270
Future Vol, veh/h 0 490 170 460 340 0 0 0 0 255 0 270
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 135 - - - - - - - 600
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 533 185 500 370 0 0 0 0 277 0 293
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 718 0 0 1996 2088 370
Stage 1 - ----- 1370 1370 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 626 718 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 883 - 0 ~ 66 53 676
Stage 1 0 - - - -0 ~ 236 214 -
Stage 2 0 - - - -0 533 433 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 883 - - ~ 29 0 676
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- ~ 29 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - ~ 236 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - ~ 231 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 8.2 $ 2005.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 883 - 29 676
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.566 - 9.558 0.434
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.3 -$ 4114.1 14.3
HCM Lane LOS - - B - F B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 3.6 - 34.1 2.2
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon SimTraffic Performance Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Opening Year Conditions AM Peak Hour
2030 AM SimTraffic Report
GHD
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicles Entered 236 291 71 4 216 38 12 2 7 41 1 159
Vehicles Exited 237 291 70 4 215 38 12 2 7 41 1 161
Hourly Exit Rate 237 291 70 4 215 38 12 2 7 41 1 161
Input Volume 276 346 72 4 212 38 11 1 7 39 2 166
% of Volume 86 84 97 100 101 100 107 200 97 105 50 97
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement All
Vehicles Entered 1078
Vehicles Exited 1079
Hourly Exit Rate 1079
Input Volume 1174
% of Volume 92
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR All
Vehicles Entered 144 352 265 123 76 262 1222
Vehicles Exited 143 352 265 123 70 245 1198
Hourly Exit Rate 143 352 265 123 70 245 1198
Input Volume 134 355 270 119 90 339 1306
% of Volume 107 99 98 103 78 72 92
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBR All
Vehicles Entered 272 73 112 224 225 201 1107
Vehicles Exited 271 73 111 224 223 200 1102
Hourly Exit Rate 271 73 111 224 223 200 1102
Input Volume 275 74 120 240 213 200 1122
% of Volume 99 99 92 93 105 100 98
Total Network Performance
Vehicles Entered 1591
Vehicles Exited 1566
Hourly Exit Rate 1566
Input Volume 5274
% of Volume 30
Queuing and Blocking Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Opening Year Conditions AM Peak Hour
2030 AM SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 70 4 16 33 35 34 120 62
Average Queue (ft) 31 0 1 2 6 6 51 47
95th Queue (ft) 61 3 10 13 22 27 98 61
Link Distance (ft) 122 251 1873
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 60 25 25 25
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 18 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 29 8
Intersection: 2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB
Directions Served L TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 69 16 891 66
Average Queue (ft) 29 1 511 60
95th Queue (ft) 55 9 1754 75
Link Distance (ft) 122 1903
Upstream Blk Time (%) 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 145 40
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 42
Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 38
Intersection: 3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB SB SB
Directions Served TR L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 4 55 158 67
Average Queue (ft) 0 19 75 37
95th Queue (ft) 3 45 135 61
Link Distance (ft) 343 1695
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 135 600
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 102
SimTraffic Performance Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Opening Year Conditions PM Peak Hour
2030 PM SimTraffic Report
GHD
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicles Entered 148 351 18 0 473 52 65 2 8 45 7 302
Vehicles Exited 147 351 18 0 473 53 65 2 8 46 7 306
Hourly Exit Rate 147 351 18 0 473 53 65 2 8 46 7 306
Input Volume 156 376 15 1 470 56 71 2 7 54 5 302
% of Volume 94 93 118 0 101 95 92 100 110 86 140 101
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement All
Vehicles Entered 1471
Vehicles Exited 1476
Hourly Exit Rate 1476
Input Volume 1514
% of Volume 97
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Vehicles Entered 220 339 567 278 69 1 178 1652
Vehicles Exited 220 338 568 278 70 1 177 1652
Hourly Exit Rate 220 338 568 278 70 1 177 1652
Input Volume 227 366 566 277 73 1 180 1691
% of Volume 97 92 100 100 96 100 98 98
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBR All
Vehicles Entered 406 133 360 277 185 193 1554
Vehicles Exited 406 133 361 277 153 178 1508
Hourly Exit Rate 406 133 361 277 153 178 1508
Input Volume 404 138 360 279 189 213 1584
% of Volume 101 96 100 99 81 83 95
Total Network Performance
Vehicles Entered 2121
Vehicles Exited 2083
Hourly Exit Rate 2083
Input Volume 6955
% of Volume 30
Queuing and Blocking Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Opening Year Conditions PM Peak Hour
2030 PM SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 85 6 5 43 40 108 50 562 62
Average Queue (ft) 38 0 0 2 4 36 8 234 51
95th Queue (ft) 70 4 4 17 23 81 33 598 59
Link Distance (ft) 122 670 251 1873
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 60 25 25 25
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 23 0 31 70
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 2 0 95 41
Intersection: 2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB
Directions Served L TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 109 25 235 70
Average Queue (ft) 51 1 66 57
95th Queue (ft) 87 11 167 81
Link Distance (ft) 122 1903
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 145 40
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 22 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 40 4
Intersection: 3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB SB SB
Directions Served TR L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 9 125 1631 625
Average Queue (ft) 0 55 1042 392
95th Queue (ft) 6 95 1996 863
Link Distance (ft) 343 1695
Upstream Blk Time (%) 26
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 135 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 59 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 127 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 309
SimTraffic Performance Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Design Year Conditions AM Peak Hour
2050 AM SimTraffic Report
GHD
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBT SBR All Vehicles Entered 276 355 85 5 251 44 17 9 55 4 216 1317 Vehicles Exited 277 354 85 5 251 44 17 9 54 5 214 1315
Hourly Exit Rate 277 354 85 5 251 44 17 9 54 5 214 1315 Input Volume 365 456 100 5 245 40 15 10 50 5 225 1516
% of Volume 76 78 85 100 102 110 111 88 107 100 95 87
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR All
Vehicles Entered 164 461 334 150 78 282 1469
Vehicles Exited 163 461 334 150 70 255 1433
Hourly Exit Rate 163 461 334 150 70 255 1433
Input Volume 160 461 336 150 110 460 1677
% of Volume 102 100 100 100 63 55 85
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBR All
Vehicles Entered 345 75 135 267 275 238 1335
Vehicles Exited 346 75 136 266 278 235 1336
Hourly Exit Rate 346 75 136 266 278 235 1336
Input Volume 335 85 150 295 285 255 1406
% of Volume 103 88 91 90 97 92 95
Total Network Performance
Vehicles Entered 1895
Vehicles Exited 1862
Hourly Exit Rate 1862
Input Volume 6725
% of Volume 28
Queuing and Blocking Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Design Year Conditions AM Peak Hour
2050 AM SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 83 31 27 10 31 34 34 260 64
Average Queue (ft) 42 1 2 0 3 8 8 103 49
95th Queue (ft) 77 19 14 5 16 26 31 235 61
Link Distance (ft) 122 670 251 1873
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 60 25 25 25
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 2 0 35 27
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 15
Intersection: 2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB
Directions Served L TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 66 10 1481 67
Average Queue (ft) 30 0 1033 64
95th Queue (ft) 52 7 2287 75
Link Distance (ft) 122 1903
Upstream Blk Time (%) 38
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 145 40
Storage Blk Time (%) 19 80
Queuing Penalty (veh) 87 88
Intersection: 3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement WB SB SB
Directions Served L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 55 392 315
Average Queue (ft) 25 145 55
95th Queue (ft) 48 337 170
Link Distance (ft) 1695
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 135 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 271
SimTraffic Performance Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Design Year Conditions PM Peak Hour
2050 PM SimTraffic Report
GHD
1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Vehicles Entered 163 403 20 550 54 95 6 11 34 2 252 1590 Vehicles Exited 162 404 20 551 54 94 6 11 30 1 221 1554 Hourly Exit Rate 162 404 20 551 54 94 6 11 30 1 221 1554 Input Volume 200 496 20 545 60 100 5 10 70 5 420 1930
% of Volume 81 81 101 101 90 94 120 107 43 20 53 80
2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR All
Vehicles Entered 235 386 576 291 79 238 1805
Vehicles Exited 236 386 575 292 71 201 1761
Hourly Exit Rate 236 386 575 292 71 201 1761
Input Volume 280 466 715 350 85 250 2147
% of Volume 84 83 80 83 83 80 82
3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBR All
Vehicles Entered 494 168 368 278 142 141 1591
Vehicles Exited 493 168 368 277 127 122 1555
Hourly Exit Rate 493 168 368 277 127 122 1555
Input Volume 490 170 460 340 255 270 1986
% of Volume 101 99 80 81 50 45 78
Total Network Performance
Vehicles Entered 2267
Vehicles Exited 2156
Hourly Exit Rate 2156
Input Volume 8798
% of Volume 25
Queuing and Blocking Report Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Design Year Conditions PM Peak Hour
2050 PM SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 1: Bevins St & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 101 31 38 34 293 50 1920 57
Average Queue (ft) 45 1 2 4 203 14 1807 48
95th Queue (ft) 84 22 14 20 342 51 2244 64
Link Distance (ft) 122 670 251 1873
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 47 83
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 25 25 25
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 90 0 37 85
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 1 9 0 153 64
Intersection: 2: SR 29 NB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB EB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 169 343 51 1754 70
Average Queue (ft) 88 23 11 986 54
95th Queue (ft) 154 165 33 2106 100
Link Distance (ft) 413 122 1903
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 145 40
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 75 24
Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 188 20
Intersection: 3: SR 29 SB Ramps & Lakeport Blvd
Movement EB WB WB SB SB
Directions Served TR L T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 105 157 203 1748 625
Average Queue (ft) 10 89 14 1613 494
95th Queue (ft) 59 150 106 2032 908
Link Distance (ft) 343 413 1695
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 83
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 135 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 97 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 262 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 741
GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 25 Appendix C
SIDRA LOS and Queuing Reports

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport & SR 29 SB Ramps AM (Site Folder: 2030 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 391 2.0 1355 0.289 100 5.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 391 2.0 0.289 5.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Lane 1d 450 2.0 988 0.455 100 9.9 LOS A 3.0 75.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 450 2.0 0.455 9.9 LOS A 3.0 75.8
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 379 2.0 980 0.387 100 6.3 LOS A 2.6 66.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 379 2.0 0.387 6.3 LOS A 2.6 66.6
Intersectio
n
1221 2.0 0.455 7.5 LOS A 3.0 75.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L2 T1 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W
Lane 1 130 261 391 2.0 1355 0.289 100 NA NA
Approach 130 261 391 2.0 0.289
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 232 1 217 450 2.0 988 0.455 100 NA NA
Approach 232 1 217 450 2.0 0.455
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: E S
Lane 1 299 80 379 2.0 980 0.387 100 NA NA
Approach 299 80 379 2.0 0.387
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1221 2.0 0.455
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: SR 29 SB Ramps Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 12:52:57 PM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport & SR 29 SB Ramps PM (Site Folder: 2030 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 695 2.0 1355 0.513 100 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 695 2.0 0.513 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Lane 1d 438 2.0 792 0.553 100 14.8 LOS B 4.8 122.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 438 2.0 0.553 14.8 LOS B 4.8 122.4
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 589 2.0 813 0.725 100 14.6 LOS B 9.1 230.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 589 2.0 0.725 14.6 LOS B 9.1 230.3
Intersectio
n
1722 2.0 0.725 11.6 LOS B 9.1 230.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W
Lane 1 391 303 695 2.0 1355 0.513 100 NA NA
Approach 391 303 695 2.0 0.513
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 205 1 232 438 2.0 792 0.553 100 NA NA
Approach 205 1 232 438 2.0 0.553
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: E S
Lane 1 439 150 589 2.0 813 0.725 100 NA NA
Approach 439 150 589 2.0 0.725
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1722 2.0 0.725
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: SR 29 SB Ramps Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 1:04:02 PM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport/Bevins & SR 29 NB Ramps AM (Site Folder:
2030 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Bevins St
Lane 1d 20 2.0 544 0.036 100 14.5 LOS B 0.2 5.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 20 2.0 0.036 14.5 LOS B 0.2 5.7
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 276 2.0 828 0.334 100 7.6 LOS A 2.1 54.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 276 2.0 0.334 7.6 LOS A 2.1 54.6
North: SB Bevins St
Lane 1d 170 2.0 1108 0.153 100 7.5 LOS A 0.9 23.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 55 2.0 1351 0.041 100 4.7 LOS A 0.2 5.3 Short 100 0.0 NA Approach 225 2.0 0.153 6.8 LOS A 0.9 23.7
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 530 2.0 1283 0.413 100 7.9 LOS A 3.3 83.7 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 530 2.0 0.413 7.9 LOS A 3.3 83.7
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Lane 1d 466 2.0 827 0.564 100 13.2 LOS B 5.0 127.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 466 2.0 0.564 13.2 LOS B 5.0 127.3
Intersectio
n
1517 2.0 0.564 9.4 LOS A 5.0 127.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: NB Bevins St
Mov. L2 L1 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W NW N E
Lane 1 9 3 1 7 20 2.0 544 0.036 100 NA NA
Approach 9 3 1 7 20 2.0 0.036
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L2 T1 R1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W NW N
Lane 1 4 160 71 41 276 2.0 828 0.334 100 NA NA
Approach 4 160 71 41 276 2.0 0.334
North: SB Bevins St
Mov. L2 T1 R2 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W NW
Lane 1 42 2 125 - 170 2.0 1108 0.153 100 NA NA
Lane 2 - - - 55 55 2.0 1351 0.041 100 0.0 1
Approach 42 2 125 55 225 2.0 0.153
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L3 L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: NW N E S
Lane 1 146 153 191 40 530 2.0 1283 0.413 100 NA NA
Approach 146 153 191 40 530 2.0 0.413
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Mov. L3 L1 R1 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: W N E S
Lane 1 98 147 184 38 466 2.0 827 0.564 100 NA NA
Approach 98 147 184 38 466 2.0 0.564
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1517 2.0 0.564
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: NB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: SB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: SR 29 NB Ramp Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 1:16:54 PM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport/Bevins & SR 29 NB Ramps PM (Site Folder:
2030 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Bevins St
Lane 1d 87 2.3 561 0.155 100 16.8 LOS B 1.0 25.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 87 2.3 0.155 16.8 LOS B 1.0 25.2
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 573 2.3 824 0.696 100 13.3 LOS B 8.1 205.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 573 2.3 0.696 13.3 LOS B 8.1 205.6
North: SB Bevins St
Lane 1d 285 2.0 708 0.403 100 11.7 LOS B 3.3 84.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 108 3.0 1130 0.095 100 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 Short 100 0.0 NA Approach 392 2.3 0.403 10.1 LOS B 3.3 84.0
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 645 2.4 1246 0.517 100 8.2 LOS A 5.2 131.3 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 645 2.4 0.517 8.2 LOS A 5.2 131.3
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Lane 1d 276 3.0 706 0.391 100 12.3 LOS B 2.7 68.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 276 3.0 0.391 12.3 LOS B 2.7 68.2
Intersectio
n
1973 2.4 0.696 11.0 LOS B 8.1 205.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W NW N E
Lane 1 52 25 2 8 87 2.3 561 0.155 100 NA NA
Approach 52 25 2 8 87 2.3 0.155
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L2 T1 R1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W NW N
Lane 1 1 342 168 61 573 2.3 824 0.696 100 NA NA
Approach 1 342 168 61 573 2.3 0.696
North: SB Bevins St
Mov. L2 T1 R2 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W NW
Lane 1 59 5 221 - 285 2.0 708 0.403 100 NA NA
Lane 2 - - - 108 108 3.0 1130 0.095 100 0.0 1
Approach 59 5 221 108 392 2.3 0.403
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L3 L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: NW N E S
Lane 1 247 114 273 11 645 2.4 1246 0.517 100 NA NA
Approach 247 114 273 11 645 2.4 0.517
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Mov. L3 L2 L1 R1 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: W NW N E S
Lane 1 79 1 55 135 5 276 3.0 706 0.391 100 NA NA
Approach 79 1 55 135 5 276 3.0 0.391
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1973 2.4 0.696
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: NB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: SB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: SR 29 NB Ramp Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 1:18:23 PM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport & SR 29 SB Ramps AM (Site Folder: 2050 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 484 2.0 1741 0.278 100 5.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 484 2.0 0.278 5.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Lane 1d 588 2.0 993 0.592 100 12.2 LOS B 5.4 136.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 588 2.0 0.592 12.2 LOS B 5.4 136.9
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 457 2.0 942 0.484 100 7.4 LOS A 3.8 96.1 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 457 2.0 0.484 7.4 LOS A 3.8 96.1
Intersectio
n
1528 2.0 0.592 8.8 LOS A 5.4 136.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W
Lane 1 163 321 484 2.0 1741 0.278 100 NA NA
Approach 163 321 484 2.0 0.278
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 310 1 277 588 2.0 993 0.592 100 NA NA
Approach 310 1 277 588 2.0 0.592
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: E S
Lane 1 364 92 457 2.0 942 0.484 100 NA NA
Approach 364 92 457 2.0 0.484
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1528 2.0 0.592
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: SR 29 SB Ramps Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport & SR 29 SB Ramps PM (Site Folder: 2050 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 800 2.0 1741 0.459 100 7.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 800 2.0 0.459 7.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Lane 1d 526 2.0 787 0.668 100 19.5 LOS B 7.7 196.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 526 2.0 0.668 19.5 LOS B 7.7 196.4
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 660 2.0 779 0.848 100 23.5 LOS C 15.1 384.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 660 2.0 0.848 23.5 LOS C 15.1 384.5
Intersectio
n
1986 2.0 0.848 15.9 LOS B 15.1 384.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W
Lane 1 460 340 800 2.0 1741 0.459 100 NA NA
Approach 460 340 800 2.0 0.459
North: SR 29 SB Ramps Approach
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 255 1 270 526 2.0 787 0.668 100 NA NA
Approach 255 1 270 526 2.0 0.668
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: E S
Lane 1 490 170 660 2.0 779 0.848 100 NA NA
Approach 490 170 660 2.0 0.848
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1986 2.0 0.848
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: SR 29 SB Ramps Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport/Bevins & SR 29 NB Ramps AM (Site Folder:
2050 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Bevins St
Lane 1d 28 2.0 380 0.074 100 20.7 LOS C 0.5 13.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 28 2.0 0.074 20.7 LOS C 0.5 13.9
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 315 2.0 760 0.415 100 9.1 LOS A 3.0 77.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 315 2.0 0.415 9.1 LOS A 3.0 77.2
North: SB Bevins St
Lane 1d 228 2.0 1100 0.207 100 7.9 LOS A 1.4 35.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 76 2.0 1393 0.055 100 4.8 LOS A 0.3 7.4 Short 100 0.0 NA Approach 304 2.0 0.207 7.1 LOS A 1.4 35.5
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 674 2.0 1474 0.457 100 7.8 LOS A 4.0 100.9 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 674 2.0 0.457 7.8 LOS A 4.0 100.9
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Lane 1d 620 2.0 768 0.807 100 24.0 LOS C 12.8 324.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 620 2.0 0.807 24.0 LOS C 12.8 324.8
Intersectio
n
1941 2.0 0.807 13.3 LOS B 12.8 324.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W NW N E
Lane 1 11 5 1 11 28 2.0 380 0.074 100 NA NA
Approach 11 5 1 11 28 2.0 0.074
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L2 T1 R1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W NW N
Lane 1 5 185 82 43 315 2.0 760 0.415 100 NA NA
Approach 5 185 82 43 315 2.0 0.415
North: SB Bevins St
Mov. L2 T1 R2 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W NW
Lane 1 54 5 168 - 228 2.0 1100 0.207 100 NA NA
Lane 2 - - - 76 76 2.0 1393 0.055 100 0.0 1
Approach 54 5 168 76 304 2.0 0.207
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L3 L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: NW N E S
Lane 1 174 201 245 54 674 2.0 1474 0.457 100 NA NA
Approach 174 201 245 54 674 2.0 0.457
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Mov. L3 L1 R1 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: W N E S
Lane 1 120 196 250 54 620 2.0 768 0.807 100 NA NA
Approach 120 196 250 54 620 2.0 0.807
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1941 2.0 0.807
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: NB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: SB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: SR 29 NB Ramp Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:58:44 AM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Lakeport/Bevins & SR 29 NB Ramps PM (Site Folder:
2050 Conditions)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB Bevins St
Lane 1d 125 2.0 423 0.295 100 23.3 LOS C 2.2 55.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 125 2.0 0.295 23.3 LOS C 2.2 55.9
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 659 2.0 778 0.847 100 23.7 LOS C 15.1 383.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 659 2.0 0.847 23.7 LOS C 15.1 383.4
North: SB Bevins St
Lane 1d 391 2.0 601 0.651 100 24.8 LOS C 8.7 220.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 147 2.0 1143 0.128 100 6.1 LOS A 0.8 20.5 Short 100 0.0 NA Approach 538 2.0 0.651 19.7 LOS B 8.7 220.6
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Lane 1d 810 2.0 1431 0.566 100 8.2 LOS A 6.2 157.2 Full 390 0.0 0.0 Approach 810 2.0 0.566 8.2 LOS A 6.2 157.2
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Lane 1d 364 2.0 630 0.578 100 18.5 LOS B 5.8 146.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 364 2.0 0.578 18.5 LOS B 5.8 146.5
Intersectio
n
2496 2.0 0.847 17.0 LOS B 15.1 383.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W NW N E
Lane 1 71 38 5 11 125 2.0 423 0.295 100 NA NA
Approach 71 38 5 11 125 2.0 0.295
East: WB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L2 T1 R1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W NW N
Lane 1 1 397 196 65 659 2.0 778 0.847 100 NA NA
Approach 1 397 196 65 659 2.0 0.847
North: SB Bevins St
Mov. L2 T1 R2 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W NW
Lane 1 76 5 310 - 391 2.0 601 0.651 100 NA NA
Lane 2 - - - 147 147 2.0 1143 0.128 100 0.0 1
Approach 76 5 310 147 538 2.0 0.651
West: EB Lakeport Blvd
Mov. L3 L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: NW N E S
Lane 1 304 141 348 16 810 2.0 1431 0.566 100 NA NA
Approach 304 141 348 16 810 2.0 0.566
SouthWest: SR 29 NB Ramp Approach
Mov. L3 L1 R1 R3 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: W N E S
Lane 1 92 76 190 5 364 2.0 630 0.578 100 NA NA
Approach 92 76 190 5 364 2.0 0.578
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2496 2.0 0.847
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: NB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: WB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: SB Bevins St
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: SR 29 NB Ramp Departure
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: EB Lakeport Blvd
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Thursday, August 03, 2023 1:39:15 PM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Roseville\Projects\561\12606482\Tech\Sidra\Lakeport Sidra Final Layout.sip9 GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project 26 Appendix D
Roundabout Alternative Exhibits

FIGURE 1: FASTPATH - BEVINS NB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 2: FASTPATH - BEVINS EB
FIGURE 3: FASTPATH - BEVINS WB
FIGURE 4: FASTPATH - BEVINS SOUTH
FIGURE 5: FASTPATH - BEVINS NORTH
FIGURE 6: BUS TURNS - BEVINS NB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 7: BUS TURNS - BEVINS EB
FIGURE 8: BUS TURNS - BEVINS WB
FIGURE 9: BUS TURNS - BEVINS SOUTH
FIGURE 10: BUS TURNS - BEVINS NORTH
FIGURE 11: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS NB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 12: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS EB
FIGURE 13: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS WB
FIGURE 14: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS SOUTH
FIGURE 15: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS NORTH
FIGURE 16: TRUCK TURNS - BEVINS NB EXIT RAMP OS/OW
INDEX:

DESIGN CHECKS EXHIBIT
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCALE: 1"=100'
January 2024
NB Exit Ramp
Bevins St
SB Entrance Ramp
Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
NB Entrance Ramp
SB Exit Ramp
FIGURE 17: FASTPATH - LAKEPORT SB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 18: FASTPATH - LAKEPORT EB
FIGURE 19: FASTPATH - LAKEPORT WB
FIGURE 20: BUS TURNS - LAKEPORT SB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 21: BUS TURNS - LAKEPORT EB
FIGURE 22: BUS TURNS - LAKEPORT WB
FIGURE 23: TRUCK TURNS - LAKEPORT SB EXIT RAMP
FIGURE 24: TRUCK TURNS - LAKEPORT EB
FIGURE 25: TRUCK TURNS - LAKEPORT WB
FIGURE 26: TRUCK TURNS - LAKEPORT SB EXIT RAMP OS/OW

BEVINS INTERSECTION (NORTHBOUND)

LAKEPORT INTERSECTION (SOUTHBOUND)

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NORTHBOUND EXIT RAMP NORTHBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 1

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 2

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 3

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST SOUTHBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 4

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST NORTHBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 5
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NORTHBOUND EXIT RAMP NORTHBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

BUS TURNS
FIGURE 6

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

FASTPATH
FIGURE 7

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

FASTPATH
FIGURE 8

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST SOUTHBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

FASTPATH
FIGURE 9

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST NORTHBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

FASTPATH
FIGURE 10

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NORTHBOUND EXIT RAMP NORTHBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 11

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 12

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 13

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST SOUTHBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 14

VEHICLE PROFILE
LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BEVINS ST NORTHBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 15

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OSOW TRUCK TURN SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp Bevins St
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 16

VEHICLE PROFILE
LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHBOUND ENTRANCE RAMP SOUTHBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp
Notes: All values are in miles per hour
V3 exiting speeds are derived from vehicle acceleration on formulas in NCHRP 672 V3 fast path speed measured at exit crosswalk or 100 feet downstream from V2.

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 17
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 18
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND FASTEST PATH SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024

FAST PATH SPEED IDENTIFIER

FAST PATH
LEGEND:

As acceleration potential of vehicle determines actual exiting speed, V3 presented is a conservative estimate. 2% cross-slope assumed for determining Fastest path

FASTPATH
FIGURE 19
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHBOUND EXIT RAMP SOUTHBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

BUS TURNS
FIGURE 20

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

BUS TURNS
FIGURE 21

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND BUS TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

BUS TURNS
FIGURE 22

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHBOUND EXIT RAMP SOUTHBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50' JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 23

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD EASTBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 24

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LAKEPORT BLVD WESTBOUND TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 25

VEHICLE PROFILE LEGEND
STATE ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OSOW TRUCK TURNS SCALE: 1"=50'
JANUARY 2024
Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp

TRUCK TURNS
FIGURE 26

VEHICLE PROFILE
LEGEND
ghd.com GHD | WMH Corporation | 12606482 | Route 29 & Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project The Power of Commitment27 PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT G

COMPLETE STREETS

DECISION DOCUMENT
(CSDD)
01 - Lak - 29 – R41.2-R41.6
Complete Streets Decision Document (CSDD)
1) Is the project located entirely on a facility where bicyclists and pedestrians are legally prohibited and the project does not involve a shared use path, pedestrian/bicycle structure or work impacting a local road crossing or interchange? (For example, a project including freeway mainline and ramp work, not including the ramp connection with the minor road, where the project freeway segment legally prohibits bicyclists and pedestrians.)
__X__ NO - Proceed to Question 2
_____ YES - Stop here. The project is exempt from further complete streets evaluation. Sign and attach to the Project Initiation Document (PID).
2) Is the primary project purpose to address assets that are outside of the roadbed where pedestrian and bicycle travel is not affected, and proposed project will not affect future pedestrian and bicycle facilities? Examples may include culvert outfalls, storm water treatment facilities, bridge substructure or scour mitigation, planting or vegetation removal, retaining walls, etc. __X__ NO - Continue to Question 3
_____ YES - Stop here. The project is exempt from further complete streets evaluation. Sign and attach to PID.
3) Has a Transportation Planning Scoping Information Sheet (TPSIS) been completed for this project? __X__ NO – Proceed to Question 4
__ __ YES – Skip to Question 5 (Note: TPSIS is attached to the PID) 4) Which of the following planning documents were consulted to determine bicycle, pedestrian or transit needs? Select all that apply and proceed to Question 5. _____a. District Active Transportation Plan
_____b. Other Caltrans or local/regional agency bike/ped/transit/safe routes to school plans _____c. ADA Transition Plan/Grievances (consult with the District ADA Coordinator) _____d. Corridor planning documents
_____e. Other (list here)
5) Based on the reviews completed in Question 4 or identified in the TPSIS, after a review of the roadway geometrics, or identified by the PDT, are there any bicycle, pedestrian, or transit needs, deficiencies or opportunities for improvement identified for the project location? _____ NO – Provide brief description of findings:

Stop here. The project meets the requirements for consideration of Complete Streets elements.

Sign and attach to the PID.
__X__ YES – Describe them here and proceed to Question 6: Add Bike Ramps and Class I Shared Use Paths at interchange ramp termini to reduce level of traffic stress at conflict points. 6) Based on the needs identified in Question 5, what would be the preferred complete streets elements to address those needs (e.g. road diet, separated bikeway, reconstructed sidewalk, etc.)? Resources include the Complete Streets Elements Toolbox, the Contextual Guidance for Bikeway Facility Selection, the Bikeway Facility Selection Guidance Memorandum, etc. List them in the table below and provide a rough estimated cost to construct preferred project complete streets elements (including rightof-way and support costs) and proceed to Question 7.

X
X
01 - Lak - 29 – R41.2-R41.6
Build Alternative

FACILITY TYPE UNIT QUANTITY ESTIMATED TOTAL
COST
Bike Ramps EA 5 $25,000
Class I Shared Use Paths LF 925 $150,000
Pedestrian Refuges EA 3 $30,000
Note: Quantities Shown are in Caltrans Right of Way only. 7) Was there any known public and stakeholder opposition to any preferred complete streets elements identified for the project? Provide response and proceed to Question 8. __X__ NO
_____ YES – Describe the opposition position here:
8) Does the programmable project alternative/project scope include all the complete streets elements identified in Question 6?
_____ NO - Proceed to Question 9
__X__ YES - Stop here. The project has met the requirements for consideration of complete streets elements. Sign and attach to PID.
9) Does the project include any of the complete streets elements that are identified in Question 6? Or are there any proposed incremental improvements related to the complete streets elements in Question 6? Provide response and proceed to Question 10.
_____ NO – The programmable project alternative does not include any complete streets elements, and therefore does not address identified needs for complete streets elements. _____ YES – List them here:

FACILITY TYPE UNIT QUANTITY ESTIMATED

TOTAL COST

10) Does the project funding have constraints that would preclude the ability to incorporate additional complete streets elements into the project (For example, cannot combine funding with other sources.)? Provide response and proceed to Question 11.
_____ NO
_____ YES – Describe the constraints here:
11) Provide a rationale and justification for not including all the recommended complete streets elements into the project: (Consider the engineering justification, right-of-way constraints, environmental impacts, etc.).
01 - Lak - 29 – R41.2-R41.6
Prepared by:

Heather Anderson, PID Preparer in responsible charge
GHD Inc, For City of Lakeport
Concurred by:

[name] Date
City of Lakeport
This Complete Streets Decision Document was prepared for a locally led Project Initiation Document and does not require concurrence by the State Department of Transportation. This CSDD will be included in the project’s Project Report during the PA&ED phase, for state concurrence, to provide compliance with the Department’s Complete Streets policy.
01 - Lak - 29 – R41.2-R41.6
Revalidation of CSDD at PA&ED
Does the project scope defined in the project approval document include the complete streets elements identified in Question 6 or 9 of this CSDD and the PID? _____ NO – Prepare a Superseding CSDD (answer Questions 1 through 11) replacing the original CSDD, obtain all certified and concurrence signatures below, and attach the superseding CSDD to the project approval document. Email superseding CSDD to HQ Division of Design at [email protected]. _____ YES – Certify there are no changes to the scope of complete streets elements with only the project engineer certification signature below on the original approved CSDD and attach the CSDD to the project approval document. Email revalidated CSDD to HQ Division of Design at [email protected].

Certified by:

Name, Project Engineer Date
Branch/Company
Concurred by: (Include concurrence signatures only if a Superseding CSDD is prepared.)

Name Date
District Complete Streets Coordinator

Name Date
Deputy District Director, Planning

Name Date
Deputy District Director, Design or
Division Chief, Design/Project Development

Name Date
District Director
01 - Lak - 29 – R41.2-R41.6
Revalidation of CSDD at PS&E
Does the project scope designed in the plans, specifications and estimate include the complete streets elements identified in Question 6 or 9 of the CSDD (or Superseding CSDD, if applicable) certified at the PA&ED revalidation and the project approval document?
_____ NO – Prepare a Superseding CSDD (answer Questions 1 through 11) replacing the CSDD that was approved at PA&ED revalidation, obtain all certified and concurrence signatures below, and attach to the Supplemental PR. If a Supplemental PR is not required, place in the project history file. Email superseding CSDD to HQ Division of Design at [email protected]. _____ YES – Certify there are no changes to scope of complete streets elements in the project, and that temporary bike and pedestrian facilities during construction have been considered. Include only the project engineer certification signature below on the CSDD that was approved at PA&ED revalidation and place the CSDD in the project history file. Email revalidated CSDD to HQ Division of Design at [email protected].

Certified by:

Name, Project Engineer Date
Branch/Company
Concurred by: (Include concurrence signatures only if a Superseding CSDD is prepared.)

Name Date
District Complete Streets Coordinator

Name Date
Deputy District Director, Planning

Name Date
Deputy District Director, Design or
Division Chief, Design/Project Development

Name Date
District Director
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT H

VEHICLE-MILES TRAVELED

DECISION DOCUMENT
(VMTDD)
Vehicle-Miles Traveled Decision Document (VMTDD)
Applicability: This form is required for PIDs prepared by Caltrans or partners, with the following project exceptions: active transportation, transit, and most SHOPP projects.1 Fill out the form and send it to Sustainability as a Word file. Add additional information as needed under each question. After review and agreement, e-signatures are required under Approval Recommended.
01/Lak/29/PM: R41.2-R41.6
Project Name: Route 29 and Lakeport Blvd Interchange Improvements Project This Vehicle Miles Traveled Decision Document was prepared for a locally led Project Initiation Document and will not be submitted for concurrence by Caltrans during this phase. This VMTDD will be included in the project’s Project Report during the PA&ED phase, for state Approval, to provide compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Senate Bill 743.
1) Are all project alternatives screened as not likely to induce travel per Section 5.1.1 of Transportation Analysis Under CEQA?
☐ NO - Proceed to Question 2.
☒ YES – Cite screening criterion(ia)
 Addition of new or enhanced bike or pedestrian facilities on existing streets/highways or within existing public rights-of -way  Addition of Class I multi-use paths, or other off-road facilities that serve non-motorized travel
 Build Alternative proposes the installation of roundabouts Stop here. The project is exempt from further VMT evaluation. Obtain district-level signatures and attach to the Project Initiation Document (PID).

No headquarters concurrence is needed.
2) Do any of the project alternatives add lane-miles (mainline or aux lanes greater than 1 mile) to the State Highway System?
☐ NO - Continue to Question 3.
☐ YES – Provide estimate of new lane-miles for all alternatives and proceed to Question 4.

Alternative
Number
Alternative Name Lane-miles Added
1 2
3 1 This form is required for SHOPP projects that add lane-miles, including auxiliary lanes, and/or expand interchanges.
01 - Lak - 29 – R42.4
2 3) Do any of the proposed alternatives add other capacity to the State Highway System (e.g., a new or widened interchange)?
☐ NO – Proceed to Question 4.
☐ YES – Describe and proceed to Question 4.

Alternative
Number
Alternative Name Capacity Added
1 2
3 4) Has induced VMT been estimated, as prescribed in Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF), Transportation Analysis Under CEQA (TAC), or other methods, for the project alternatives?
☐ NO – Proceed to Question 5.
☐ YES – Provide estimates and the methods from which they were obtained, and proceed to Question 5.

Alternative
Number
Alternative
Name
VMT Estimate Estimation Method
1 2
3 5) Have VMT-reducing project elements or mitigation measures have been identified? ☐ NO – Proceed to Question 6
☐ YES – Describe and proceed to Question 6:
6) What is the budget for VMT mitigation? Provide the dollar figure and rationale. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 01 - Lak - 29 – R42.4
3 7) Provide estimated completion dates and points of contacts for the following technical studies to be produced in PA&ED and submitted to HQ.

Document Contact name Contact e-mail Scheduled date
VMT
assessment
methodology*
Draft VMT
assessment*
Final VMT
assessment*
Mitigation plan
Draft
environmental
document
Final
environmental
document
* Submission not required for projects exclusively employing the NCST California Induced Travel Calculator, nor for projects located in counties outside of MPO boundaries.
01 - Lak - 29 – R42.4
4 To Be Completed by HQ
Recommendation(s) to Project Development Teams (PDTs), Districts, and/or Partners Project screened as unlikely to induce VMT ☐ YES ☐ NO
01 - Lak - 29 – R42.4
5 Approved by:
________________________________ ______________________ Name Date
Deputy District Director, Environmental
________________________________ ______________________ [NAME] Date
Deputy District Director,
Transportation Planning and Local Assistance
________________________________ ______________________ Matthew Brady Date
District Director
________________________________ ______________________ Eric Sundquist Date
Acting Deputy Director, Sustainability
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT I

RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBITS
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT
CHEVRON PARCEL - APN: 005-043-23
SCALE: 1"=50'
FEBRUARY 2024
LAKEPORT Blvd

SB EXIT RAMP
TODD Rd
PARALLEL Dr

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY

PRELIMINARY PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
APN: 005-043-23
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT:
410 SQFT
LEGEND

STATE R/W

STATE R/W
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT
LAKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PARCEL - APN: 025-472-02 SCALE: 1"=50'
FEBRUARY 2024

NB EXIT RAMP
BEVINS St
LAKEPORT Blvd
APN: 025-472-02
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT:
37,450 SQFT

STATE R/W

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY

PRELIMINARY PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT
MALL PARCEL - APN: 025-472-05
SCALE: 1"=50'
FEBRUARY 2024

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY

PRELIMINARY PROPOSED PERMIT TO ENTER AND CONSTRUCT
LEGEND
LAKEPORT Blvd
APN: 025-472-05
PROPOSED PERMIT TO ENTER AND CONSTRUCT:
890 SQFT

STATE R/W

STATE R/W
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT
MCDONALDS PARCEL - APN: 005-043-18
SCALE: 1"=50'
FEBRUARY 2024
APN: 005-043-18
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT:
1,490 SQFT

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY

PRELIMINARY PROPOSED PERMIT TO ENTER AND CONSTRUCT
LEGEND
TODD RdPARALLEL Dr

STATE R/W STATE R/W
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT
LAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PARCEL - APN 005-043-27 SCALE: 1"=50'
FEBRUARY 2024

NB EXIT RAMP
BEVINS St
LAKEPORT Blvd
APN: 005-043-27
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT:
5,350 SQFT

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY

PRELIMINARY PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LEGEND

STATE R/W
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT J

STORM WATER DATA REPORT
(1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 1 of 7
Long Form – Stormwater Data Report Template

Dist-County-Route:1 – Lake County – Route 29
Post Mile Limits: 41.2 to 41.6
Type of Work: Interchange Improvement Project
Project ID (EA): TBD
Phase: PID PA/ED PS&E
Applicable Caltrans Post Construction Treatment Requirement: 2012 2022 Regional Water Quality Control Board(s): Clear Lake City Water Authority Total Disturbed Soil Area: 24.8 ac PCTA: 3.6 ac
Alternative Compliance (acres): 0 ATA 2 (50% Rule)? Yes No Estimated Const. Start Date: 2029 Estimated Const. Completion Date: 2030 Risk Level: RL 1 RL 2 RL 3 WPCP Other:

Is (M)WELO applicable? Yes No
Is the Project within a TMDL watershed? Yes No
Does the project require trash treatment? Yes No
Notification of ADL reuse (if yes, provide date): Yes Date: No

This Report has been prepared under the direction of the following Licensed Person. The Licensed Person attests to the technical information contained herein and the date upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based. Professional Engineer or Landscape Architect stamp required at PS&E only.

Erin Gibbs, PE 2/29/2024
Registered Project Engineer Date
I have reviewed the stormwater quality design issues and find this report to be complete, current and accurate:
[Name], Project Manager Date
[Name], District Maintenance Stormwater Coordinator Date [Name], Designated Landscape Architect
Representative
Date
[Stamp Required at PS&E only] [Name], District/Regional Design SW Coordinator or Designee
Date
(1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 2 of 7

1. Project Description
There are no existing treatment BMPs within the project area. The NNI is less than 50% of the postproject impervious area.

Disturbed Soil Area and New Impervious Surface
The disturbed soil area (DSA) was calculated by using approximate grading limits and a ten-foot buffer on side improvements not connected to the existing roadway. Areas that are maintained (i.e. restriping, cold plane and overlay) are not included in these areas. New Impervious Surface (NIS) is the sum of the Net New Impervious surface (NNI) post-project impervious area – pre-project impervious area and Replaced Impervious Surface (RIS). Treatment BMPs will be required if the NIS is over one acre. Quantities were calculated from preliminary design plans and are likely to change as the design is refined. The following table provides a breakdown of Disturbed Soil Area by right-ofway. Survey data, project models, and aerial photography were utilized to calculate the NIS for the project. The NIS was calculated by summing the NNI and the RIS. The Excluded Impervious Areas (EIA) are those areas that are non-pollutant generating such as sidewalks and bike lanes that can be excluded from the treatment calculation. Please see the tables below for a summary of the project disturbed soil area and impervious surface
Table 1a: Disturbed Soil Area Summary
Right-of-Way
(ROW)
Disturbed
Soil Area
(DSA)
Acres
State 17.50
City 7.31
Total 24.81
Table 1b: Project Area Summary
Right-of-Way
(ROW)
Pre-Project
Impervious
Post-Project
Impervious
Net New
Impervious
(NNI)
Replaced
Impervious
Surface
(RIS)
New
Impervious
Surface
(NIS)
Excluded
Impervious
Area (EIA)
Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres
State 7.73 7.93 0.20 1.33 1.53 0.12
Table 1c: Project Area Summary
Right-of-Way
(ROW)
Pre-Project
Impervious
Post-Project
Impervious
Net New
Impervious
(NNI)
Replaced
Impervious
Surface
(RIS)
New
Impervious
Surface
(NIS)
Excluded
Impervious
Area (EIA)
Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres
City 3.30 3.15 -0.15 1.24 1.09 0.10

2. Site Data and Stormwater Quality Design Issues
The following bodies of water are on the 303(d) list: Adobe Creak (Lake County), Clear Lake, Cole Creek (Lake County), Forbes Creek (Lake County), Lower Blue Lake, and McGaugh Slough (Lake County).
(1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 3 of 7
Hydrologic Unit, Receiving Waterbodies, and CWA 303(d) List The Project is located within the Kelsy Creek-Clear Lake watershed in the Manning Creek-Frontal Clear Lake Subwatershed. Located within Hydrologic Unit of CACHE CREEK, the receiving body of water is Forbes Creek which flows into Clear Lake. Regional Water Board for the area is the Central Valley, Region Number 5, and Clear Lake is listed on the 303(d) Listed Water Bodies.

Climate Data
The average annual rainfall for this area is 33.65 inches per the Water Quality Planning Tool.

Geotechnical Information and Land Use
The Project area is located in Lake County. At this time, a project specific geotechnical investigation has not been performed, but will be completed as part of PA/ED. The soil has a K-factor of 0.37, per Caltrans Water Quality Planning Tool, indicating the soils have moderate detachment susceptibility and can create moderate runoff. The project area is comprised of existing roadway and bordered by commercial and undeveloped land.

Hazardous Waste
A search of the Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites List (Cortese List) was completed to determine if there are any known hazardous waste facilities located on or adjacent to the project corridor. One open site, identified as New Lakeport Courthouse, was identified on property located southeast of the project corridor on the east side of Highway 29. Review of site documentation notes the presence of elevated concentrations of heavy metals and naturally occurring asbestos detected in soils due to the presence of serpentinite bedrock and fragments in the overlying fill material on the site.

3. Construction Site BMPs to be used on Project
The project disturbs greater than 10,000 sqft of soil and thus requires a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPP will be developed by the Contractor and submitted to Caltrans for approval prior to the start of construction.

This Project disturbed area is greater than one acre of soil and is thereby subject to the State Water Resources Control Board’s NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, most recently by Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ,) or Construction General Permit (CGP). After construction of the project and all BMPs are finished, the project team will coordinate with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to complete a Notice of Completion.

The Caltrans Water Quality Planning Tool identifies that the R factor within the project area is 60, K factor is 0.37, the LS factor is 1.76. The product of these factors is 39.07. Since this number is between 15 and 75 this soil has a medium sediment risk.

Per the Caltrans Water Quality Planning Tool, the project is located in a high-risk receiving watershed, and therefore is considered to have a high-risk receiving water. The project has been identified as being Risk Level 2 using the Geographic Information System Map Method 1, Appendix 2 of the CGP. (1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 4 of 7
The watershed Erosion Estimate is 39.07 tons per acre which is a medium sediment risk. Project watershed outfall is Kelsey Creek-Clear Lake which is located within a high-risk receiving watershed.

Table 3 on the following page summarizes the sediment and receiving water risk and presents the calculated risk level. The factors used to determine the planning watershed sediment risk are included in the risk level determination documentation located in the Required Attachments.

(1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 5 of 7
Table 3
R Factor K Factor LS Factor
Product
(R*K*LS)
Sediment
Risk
Receiving
Water Risk Risk Level
60 0.37 1.76 39.07 Medium High 2
Project Risk Factor
Project Risk Level: Level 2 The project risk level was determined by weighing the sediment risk factor with the receiving water risk factor. See below for the Risk Level Matrix.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
The Project will disturb more than 10,000 sqft of soil, so a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required to comply with the CGP. The Contractor is responsible for securing locations for the staging and storage that are required by the Resident Engineer (RE). The SWPPP will be prepared by the Contractor and approved by the RE. The SWPPP will incorporate the following construction site BMPs: temporary fiber roll, temporary drainage inlet protection, temporary construction entrance/exits, bonded fiber matrix, and temporary check dams. Additional BMPs will be included as lump sum bid items under Job Site Management, Prepare SWPPP, and Additional Water Pollution Control.

The SWPPP will include the development of a Construction Site Monitoring Program, which presents procedures and methods related to the visual monitoring and sampling and analysis plans for nonvisible pollutants, sediment, and turbidity. As described above, the Project will be classified as a Risk Level 2 project. Risk Level 2 project requirements include the preparation of a Rain Event Action Plan prior to an anticipated rain event, performing stormwater sampling at all discharge locations during a qualifying rain event, compliance with numeric action levels, and preparation of annual reports detailing BMP and sampling efforts. SCTA will also administer the Notice of Intent. (1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 6 of 7

4. Maintenance BMPs
The water quality design has not been evaluated at this point in the project, but permanent water quality treatment will be required as part of the design and there are multiple on-site opportunities to incorporate. It is probable that bioswales will be incorporated into the design to address this requirement. Drainage Inlet Stenciling will be provided at all inlets within the project limits due to the presence of pedestrians and bicycles.

5. Other Water Quality Requirements and Agreements
The majority of this project will be constructed within Caltrans and City ROW and additional ROW acquisition will be required to support the project construction.

6. Permanent BMPs
Rapid Stability Assessment
No RSA is required as the project area is not part of a Threshold Drainage Area.

Design Pollution Prevention (DPP) BMP Strategy Downstream Effects There are no direct discharges to a stream so there are no downstream effects.

Slope/Surface Protection
In addition to temporary construction BMPS and new treatment BMPs, all areas disturbed by construction activities will receive permanent soil stabilization treatments post-construction using a combination of Erosion Control Measures. Appropriate and specific measures will be refined as design advances but can be expected to include rolled erosion control product, fiber rolls, hydromulch, and hydroseed. Any proposed slopes steeper than 2:1 will need to be accompanied by a 04-SON-121, PM 7.8-8.4 Long Form - Stormwater Data Report EA 04-1Y170K September 2023 PPDG July 2017, 7 of 8 geotechnical recommendation. Staging or equipment storge in unpaved, roadside areas will be returned to pre-existing conditions, including decompaction and soil amendment prior to the application of erosion control treatment. Permanent Erosion Control is estimated to be approximately 1% of the estimated Roadway Project Cost.

Concentrated Flow Conveyance Systems
The existing roadway drainage system includes existing inlets, manholes, and pipes. The proposed drainage system will replace the existing inlets and manholes and provide positive drainage in the new roundabout intersections.

Preservation of Existing Vegetation and Soils
Clearing of existing vegetation within the project limits will be necessary. Any environmentally sensitive areas will be marked with high visibility fence prior to construction beginning. Existing vegetation will be unaltered in locations where possible.

(1-Lak-29), (PM 41.2-41.6) SWDR – Long Form
(February 2024)
PPDG July 2023 7 of 7
Attachments
• Location Map
• Impervious/Pervious Exhibits Pre and Post Project
WestsideParkRd
BevinsSt
Lakeport Blvd
Todd Rd
ParallelDr
N
apa

LOCATION

PROJECT
Lakeport DMV
Medical Center
Sutter Lakeside
Lake County
Commerce
Chamber of
Lake
Upper
Dealership
Chevy
L
arrecou
Ln
Shopping Center
Vista Point
PM 41.6
PM 41.2
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DISTURBED SOIL AREA SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr

DISTURBED SOIL AREA

SQFT ACRE
STATE AREA 762,500 17.50
CITY AREA 318,400 7.31
TOTAL 1,080,900 24.81

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY LIMIT

DISTURBED SOIL AREA (STATE)

DISTURBED SOIL AREA (CITY)
LEGEND
Bevins St
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRE-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACES SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr

PRE-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS PRE-PROJECT SIDEWALK

SQFT ACRE SQFT ACRE
STATE AREA 332,700 7.64 4,000 0.09
CITY AREA 136,200 3.13 7,600 0.17
TOTAL 468,900 10.77 11,600 0.26

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY LIMIT

PRE-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS (STATE)

PRE-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS (CITY)

PRE-PROJECT SIDEWALK (STATE)

PRE-PROJECT SIDEWALK (CITY)
LEGEND
Bevins St
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT POST-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr

POST-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS POST-PROJECT SIDEWALK

SQFT ACRE SQFT ACRE
STATE AREA 345,300 7.93 5,300 0.12
CITY AREA 137,400 3.15 4,500 0.10
TOTAL 482,700 11.08 9,800 0.22

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY LIMIT

POST-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS (STATE)

POST-PROJECT SIDEWALK (STATE)

POST-PROJECT IMPERVIOUS (CITY)

POST-PROJECT SIDEWALK (CITY)
LEGEND
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SCALE: 1"=300'
FEBRUARY 2024
NB Exit Ramp
NB Entrance Ramp Bevins St
Lakeport Blvd Lakeport Blvd
SB Exit Ramp
SB Entrance Ramp Todd Rd Parallel Dr
Parallel Dr

REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REMOVED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE

SQFT ACRE SQFT ACRE
STATE AREA 58,100 1.33 28,200 0.65
CITY AREA 53,800 1.24 16,300 0.37
TOTAL 111,800 2.57 44,500 1.02

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY LIMIT

REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (STATE)

REPLACED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (CITY)

REMOVED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (STATE)

REMOVED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (CITY)
LEGEND
Bevins St
PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT K

CONCEPTUAL STAGING EXHIBITS
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FEBRUARY 2024
CONCEPTUAL STAGING EXHIBITS SCALE 1"=50’
STAGE 1
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FEBRUARY 2024
SCALE 1"=50’
STAGE 2

CONCEPTUAL STAGING EXHIBITS
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FEBRUARY 2024
CONCEPTUAL STAGING EXHIBITS SCALE 1"=50’
STAGES 3 & 4
STAGE 4: GRIND/OVERLAY REMAINING AND PLACE FINAL STRIPING, NOT SHOWN.

STAGE 3: CONSTRUCT MEDIANS. SHOWN THIS STAGE.

STAGE NOTES:

PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT L

PROPOSED AND EXISTING

UTILITY EXHIBIT

PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE
FEBRUARY 2024
PROPOSED AND EXISTING UTILITIES SCALE 1"=50’
10"
PVC
8 "
ACP
4 "
6"PVC 15
"
8"FORCE
12"FORCE
3 "
FORCE
FORCE
6 "
6"
ACP
8"
14" C900
0 "
C900
8"C900
8"
C900
14 "
D
IP
2 "
PVC
8"PVC
8"PVC
LEGEND

EXISTING STREET LIGHTING

EXISTING ELECTRICAL PULL BOX

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING WATER VALVE

EXISTING WATER CAP

EXISTING WATER METER

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUIT

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE

PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET
ROUTE 29 AND LAKEPORT BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PSR-PDS SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project 01 - LAK - 29 - PM 41.2/PM 41.6

ATTACHMENT M
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (V0.1)
Quality
Management
Plan
For Preparation of the
Project Initiation Document for the
Lakeport Boulevard at
Bevins Street Project
City of Lakeport
1 March 2023
The Power of Commitment

APROVAL SHEET
This Quality Management Plan (QMP) has been developed to direct the Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program that will be implemented for the development, review, and approval of the locally led Project Initiation Document (PID) for the Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Project.

Approved by: Date:

Heather Anderson, PE
Consultant Project Manager
Approved by: Date:

Shawn Vogtman, EIT
Consultant QMP Manager
Approved by: Date:

Victor Fernandez
City of Lakeport Project Manager

REVIEW AND REVISION LOG
Separate revisions are required within 30 days for all substantive changes, while editorial changes shall be tracked and incorporated upon the occurrence of the next required revision. At a minimum, this QMP is audited annually to ensure its accuracy and continuing relevance. Upon completion of an annual review, include “Annual Audit Completed” in the Rev. Description column along with a summary of implemented changes. If no updates are required, state “No change.” A record of all published revisions is given in the table below.

Rev. No. Rev. Description Rev. Date

WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan i Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Quality Control and Quality Assurance Reviews 1

2.1 Quality Control 1

2.1.1 Checking of Calculations 1

2.1.2 Checking of Drawings 1

2.2 Quality Assurance 2

3. Reporting Structure 2

4. QA/QC Duties and Responsibilities 3

4.1 Principal in Charge 3

4.2 Project Managers 3

4.2.1 Consultant Project Manager 3

4.2.2 Consultant QMP Manager 3

4.2.3 City of Lakeport Project Manager 3

4.3 Technical Staff 4

5. Document Control 4

6. Control of Subconsultants 4

7. Dispute Resolution 4
Attachments 4
Exhibit A. List of Deliverables 5
Exhibit B. Quality Control Cover Sheet 6
Exhibit C. Project Schedule 7
WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 1

1. Introduction
The purpose of this Quality Management Plan (QMP) is to facilitate an effective and efficient process for the development, review, and approval of the Project Initiation Document (PID) for the Lakeport Boulevard at Bevins Street Project sponsored by the City of Lakeport (City). As the project sponsor, the City has approved the development of this QMP, which meets the standards of professional practice and satisfies requirements of the project scope, cost, and schedule.

The Project Managers from the Consultant Team and the City shall ensure that all Project Development Team (PDT) members utilize the QMP elements as described in this document during the development and review of the PID.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) checks will be performed before deliverables are submitted to the City for review. Each team member must understand the project objectives, apply sound engineering principles, and is expected to produce high-quality, accurate, and complete documents within the project schedule and budget.

Project documents will be prepared in accordance with current City, Lake County, and Caltrans regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards, including compliance with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements as applicable.

2. Quality Control and Quality Assurance
Reviews

2.1 Quality Control
– A Project Schedule shall be developed with the consensus of the PDT that identifies all anticipated deliverables, including submittal dates and review periods. Exhibit A includes a list of deliverables and assigned QC reviewers. – Prior to submission to the City, each deliverable will be subject to Quality Control (QC) reviews in addition to reviews conducted by senior WMH and GHD staff.
– Project documents will be reviewed for conformance with project design criteria, legibility, and completeness as well as compliance with regulatory and code requirements. – All QC comments will be evaluated by the lead author for the deliverable, discussed with the QC reviewer as needed, and, if appropriate, incorporated into the deliverable. The Project Managers from the Consultant Team and the City will review and approve the resolution of each comment. – The Project Quality Control Cover Sheet, shown in Exhibit B, shall be used to document all QC reviews.

2.1.1 Checking of Calculations
Final report calculations associated with conceptual alternatives, cost estimates, and traffic analysis technical reports shall be checked for reasonableness by senior WMH and GHD staff. All calculations shall be made available for review by the City.

2.1.2 Checking of Drawings
Conceptual geometric plans, figures, mapping, and preliminary bridge and/or structure plans (if applicable) shall be checked in accordance with established standards (e.g. Caltrans Highway Design Manual, City or County standards) by senior WMH and GHD staff.

WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 2

2.2 Quality Assurance
The Consultant Project Manager and Consultant Quality Manager will be responsible for assuring that the development of all deliverables follow the stated QA/QC procedures. A Quality Assurance Log shall be maintained for each deliverable that includes the dates when documents were reviewed and the names of the QC reviewers.

3. Reporting Structure
A high-level organization chart that outlines the reporting structure and assigned staff involved in QA/QC activities is provided below.

WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 3

4. QA/QC Duties and Responsibilities
Quality control begins with assigning the appropriate qualified person to each task. Each member of the team is responsible for controlling the quality of the product, beginning with the project staff through to the project managers.

Team members overseeing and doing the work will be assigned based on appropriate qualifications and experience.

All team members will be in regular communication with each other and their respective managers regarding project status, schedule, and any issues that arise during development of the PID.

The duties and responsibilities of each project member are described below.

4.1 Principal in Charge
The principal in charge (PIC) is responsible for allocation of resources and monitoring of the project to ensure adherence to the project objectives, schedule, budget, approvals, and for ensuring that the QMP is in place and implemented. The PIC provides periodic audits of technical work and performance of staff.

4.2 Project Managers
Each participating agency on the project development team (PDT) will designate a Project Manager.

4.2.1 Consultant Project Manager
The Consultant Project Manager is responsible for:
– Completion of the project scope and tasks, adherence to the project schedule and budget, and implementation of the QA/QC program
– Allocating resources for work, scheduling various activities, and adjusting plans as work progresses – Identifying potential problem areas and resolving them in a timely manner – Technical review and approval of project deliverables – Certifying that each submittal has been prepared and checked in accordance with this QMP, including verifying that sound engineering practices have been used to produce a quality product – Maintaining frequent contact and communication with the City’s Team to assure satisfactory progress and performance

4.2.2 Consultant QMP Manager
The Consultant QMP Manager is responsible for:
– Reviewing and monitoring implementation of the QMP and QA/QC program – Identifying the QA/QC actions that need to be taken, resources that need to be applied, and the interaction of these activities with other work tasks
– Identifying project personnel and their duties, allocating time and resources to quality control, and reviewing allocated resources as work progresses

4.2.3 City of Lakeport Project Manager
The City’s Project Manager is responsible for:
– Implementing local and Caltrans standards, policies, and procedures – Coordinating with the Consultant Project Manager
WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 4 – Ensuring potential issues and deficiencies are identified early and resolved promptly – Periodically reviewing QC documentation
– Identifying and communicating nonconforming conditions

4.3 Technical Staff
WMH and GHD technical staff are responsible for:
– Producing high-quality work within their related disciplines – Monitoring work to assure adherence to the contract scope of services and to the established review procedures to ensure consistency with local and Caltrans standards, policies, and procedures – Advising the Consultant Project Manager regarding the progress of work and of any circumstances that may require particular attention
– Reviewing their own work and the work of their peers prior to providing deliverables to QC reviewer(s) – Resolving QC review comments
– Ensuring comments are incorporated into final documents

5. Document Control
WMH/GHD shall maintain and make available electronic records of drafts and final reports for inspection for the duration of the contract.

6. Control of Subconsultants
WMH/GHD shall ensure that any sub-consultants that join the team have the same commitment to quality control and quality assurance and comply with this QMP.

7. Dispute Resolution
If disputes occur during the project, the resolution process will first occur at the team level, which will include the Consultant Project Management, its subconsultants (if necessary), and City staff. A virtual (or in-person if required) meeting with this team to discuss and hopefully resolve the dispute will be conducted. If the dispute cannot be resolved at the team level, a second meeting will be conducted, including the team described above, as well as the Principal-in-Charge and the QMP Manager.

Attachments
Exhibit A. List of Deliverables
Exhibit B. Quality Control Cover Sheet
Exhibit C: Project Schedule
WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 5 Exhibit A. List of Deliverables
Deliverable Consultant Reviewer City of Lakeport Reviewer Project Schedule Sean Charles Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Quality Management Plan Sean Charles Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Project Purpose & Need Statement Heather Anderson Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Alternatives Evaluation & Screening Sean Charles Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Traffic Analysis / Reports & ICE Kamesh Vedula Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) Brian Bacciarini Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) Heather Anderson Paul Curren Risk Register Heather Anderson Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Cost Estimates Shawn Vogtman Paul Curren
Traffic Management Memo Heather Anderson Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez Draft and Final PID Sean Charles Paul Curren/Victor Fernandez

WMH/GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 6 Exhibit B. Quality Control Cover Sheet
GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 7 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document. Exhibit C. Project Schedule GHD | City of Lakeport | 12606482 | Quality Management Plan 1 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Resolution No. Page 1
362590.1
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2024)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT

ADOPTING THE PROJECT STUDY REPORT-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT (PSR-PDS) FOR THE SR-29 AND LAKEPORT INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City proposes constructing roundabouts at key intersections to improve traffic flow and safety; and
WHEREAS, the PSR-PDS provides a technical foundation for the project, identifying significant delays and other concerns under existing conditions; and WHEREAS, the project will address deficiencies including the lack of bicycle facilities, sidewalks, curb ramps, and marked crosswalks; and
WHEREAS, the findings of this study will serve as a nexus for establishing future development fees within the corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City will seek funding from various sources to advance the project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Lakeport that the Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) for the SR-29 and Lakeport Interchange Improvement Project is hereby adopted.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT that City staff is authorized to seek funding and initiate the environmental and design phases of the project.

This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular meeting thereof on the 18th day of June 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINING:

ABSENT:
______________________________
MICHAEL FROIO, Mayor
ATTEST:

Resolution No. Page 2
362590.1
_____________________________
KELLY BUENDIA, City Clerk
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
361822.1

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council ☐
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District ☐
Lakeport Industrial Development Authority ☐
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport ☐

STAFF REPORT
RE: Set A Public Hearing on September 3, 2024 for Adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and Issue Proposition 218 Notice MEETING DATE: 06/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Nicholas Walker, Assistant City Manager / Finance Director PURPOSE OF REPORT: ☐Information only ☐ Discussion ☐Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) setting a public hearing regarding adjustments to rates for solid waste utility service for September 3, 2024 and to direct staff to provide notice (Exhibit A to Attachment 1) of the public hearing as required by law.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Lakeport contracts for the provision of solid waste collection as well as recycling, composting and disposal services, which together comprise critically necessary health, safety, and environmental utility. The City’s has a Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Yard Waste Collection, Processing, and Disposal Services (Agreement) with Lakeport Disposal Inc. (Lakeport Disposal) for provision of these services which became effective May 19, 2015. The Agreement term is currently set to expire on December 31, 2026.

Section 6.02 of the Agreement established initial rates of compensation payable to Lakeport Disposal for solid waste utility service and Section 6.03 of the Agreement provides for annual adjustments to solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2017 and annually thereafter, based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San Francisco Bay Area (CPI-U) from April to April, as well as other changes in fees and charges imposed by third parties. Section 6.03 of the Agreement also provides those annual adjustments to solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2021 and thereafter shall be subject to approval by the City Council after a majority protest hearing as required by article XIII D, section 6(a) of the California Constitution and Government Code section 53750 et seq. The last adjustment to solid waste utility service rates was on July 1, 2021 and was a 2.07% increase over the prior year (Attachment 2). No adjustments to solid waste utility service rates were made in 2022 or 2023.

In September 2023, after a competitive procurement process to select a solid waste services and financial consultant, the City awarded a contract to R3 Consulting Group, Inc. (R3) to review and analyze Lakeport Disposal’s financial information, revenue and expense projections to determine whether adjustments to solid waste utility service rates are necessary to recover revenue to fund the cost of solid waste utility services provided by Lakeport Disposal.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
361822.1
DISCUSSION:

Recommendation for Adjustment to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates in 2024 R3 conducted a thorough analysis of Lakeport Disposal’s financial information, including audited financial statements for fiscal years (FYs) 2018-19 and 2020-21 and unaudited financial reports for FYs 2021-22 and 2022-

23. Financial information for the current FY 2023-24 was also analyzed. R3’s analysis found that compensation paid to Lakeport Disposal via the solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2021 is no longer sufficient to fund the cost of solid waste utility services.

Given the need for solid waste utility service rates to provide funding to cover the cost of providing solid waste services, R3 recommended a 13.52% adjustment to solid waste utility service rates in 2024. This recommended adjustment accounts for the fact that no adjustments to rates were made in 2022 and 2023 and is based on the terms and conditions for annual adjustments to solid waste utility service rates in Section 6.03 of the Agreement.

Had adjustments to solid waste utility service rates occurred in 2022 and 2023 per the CPI-U, the adjustment for 2022 would have been 5.00% and the adjustment for 2023 would have been 4.19%. For 2024, the change in the CPI-U from April 2023 to April 2024 is 3.77%. Taken altogether, the cumulative and compounded change in CPI-U from April 2021 to April 2024 is the recommended adjustment of 13.52%. No adjustments for changes in fees or charges imposed by third parties were identified nor are included in the recommendation. Likewise, there are no retroactive or “catch-up” adjustments included in the recommendation. The full table of recommended rates is included as Attachment 3.

R3 has recommended that the City include details regarding future adjustments to solid waste utility services rates in the notice of public hearing (Exhibit A to Attachment 1). In accordance with this recommendation, the public hearing notice states that solid waste utility service rates will be adjusted July 1 of 2025 and 2026 in accordance to the April to April change in the CPI-U, which has ranged from 1.11% to 5.00% and averaged 3.4% in the last 10 years.

Comparison of City’s Solid Waste Utility Service Rates to Other Communities Existing solid waste utility rates in the City are among the lowest of the incorporated cities in Lake and Mendocino Counties, with residential solid waste utility rates in the City being the lowest overall. Table 1 compares the City’s current (2021-22) and proposed (2024-25) residential solid waste utility rates to residential rates for incorporated cities in Lake and Mendocino Counties. All rates shown are monthly service rates.

Table 1 – Comparison of Current and Recommended Residential Solid Waste Utility Rates to Other Incorporated Cities in Lake and Mendocino Counties
Incorporated City 20-gal 32-gal 95-gal
Lakeport Current (2021-22) $ 17.54 $ 25.90 $ 76.18
Clearlake (2024) $ 24.64 $ 29.24 $ 73.14
Ukiah (2024) $ 26.07 $ 29.38 $ 94.47
Lakeport Recommended (2024-25) $ 19.91 $ 29.40 $ 86.48
Fort Bragg (2022) $ 22.01 $ 33.11 $ 99.36
Willits (2024) $ 19.60 $ 34.64 $ 93.93
Point Arena (2023-24) $ 32.13 $ 36.82 $ 85.90
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 3 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
361822.1
The residential solid waste utility rates shown in Table 1 are sorted by the 32-gallon solid waste utility service rate, which is the service level most commonly solid waste service subscription level by customers in the City. As shown in Table 1, the City’s current solid waste utility service rates are the lowest of those surveyed for the 20-gallon and 32-gallon service levels and are second lowest for the 96-gallon service level.

After application of the recommended 13.52% adjustment to the City’s solid waste utility service rates, the City’s rates will be second lowest for the 20-gallon service ($0.31 per month higher than the lowest rate) and third lowest for the 32-gallon service ($0.16 per month higher than the lowest rate). These two service levels combined comprised over 95% of residential solid waste subscriptions in the City, and both will be lower than the average comparable monthly solid waste utility service rate charged in the other cities.

The recommended rate for 95-gallon customers will also be third lowest ($13.34 per month higher than the lowest rate) and below the average comparable monthly solid waste utility service rate charged in the other cities.

Commercial solid waste utility service rates in the City are likewise recommended for 13.52% adjustment and will generally be within the range of the average comparable rates, depending on the level of service received.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

The Agreement provides for a Franchise Fee (10% of gross revenues) and an Administration/Billing Fee (4%) which together recover the City’s costs of providing solid waste-related services, including billing and collections service, management and administration of the solid waste collection utility, as well as charges for the reasonable value of the use of City property for the provision of solid waste services and to recover the costs of addressing the specific impacts of refuse vehicles on City streets and rights of-way.

R3 completed an analysis of the Franchise Fee and Administrative/Billing Fee due to a recent decision by the California State Supreme Court in Zolly v. City of Oakland, which ruled that franchise fees may be subject to Article XIII C, section 1(e) of the California Constitution (“Proposition 26”). Under Proposition 26, all charges imposed by public agencies must fit within one of its enumerated exceptions, or they will be considered taxes, which require voter approval. In the context of solid waste, fees generally fit within one of Proposition 26’s exceptions if they are charges for (1) City services that do not exceed the City’s costs to provide the services; (2) the use of public property; or (3) a special benefit or privilege granted directly to the payor.

R3’s study report (Attachment 4) concluded that the City’s current and projected Franchise Fee and Administration/Billing Fee revenues do not exceed the City’s cost of providing solid waste-related services together with the reasonable charges that the City could impose for the use of City property for solid waste services. At the recommended adjustments to solid waste utility service rates, the City may anticipate increases in combined Franchise Fee and Administration/Billing Fee revenues on the order of $42,000 in FY 2024-25.

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:

R3 conducted a detailed analysis of Lakeport Disposal’s financial information, revenue and expense projections, and the recommended adjustments to solid waste utility rates. R3 found that the recommended adjustments to solid waste utility rates recover revenue to support provision of solid waste utility services within the parameters set by relevant law, including article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”).

The City Attorney has advised that the City comply with the requirements of Proposition 218 in authorizing the proposed adjustments to the solid waste utility rates. Those requirements include issuance of the recommended 45-day written notice to solid waste utility users (Exhibit A to Attachment 1). The notice informs solid waste utility users about the reasons for proposed rates, the date and location of the public hearing (September 3, 2024), and how they can provide a written protest of the proposed rates. If more than 50% of solid waste utility users protest in writing, then the City Council will not be able to authorize the proposed solid waste utility rates.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 4 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
361822.1
OPTIONS:

1. Set a public hearing on September 3, 2024 for adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and direct staff to issue Proposition 218 Notice.

2. Do not set a public hearing on for adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and direct staff not to issue Proposition 218 Notice.

3. Provide alternative dates for setting a public hearing on September 3, 2024 for adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and direct staff to issue Proposition 218 Notice.

FISCAL IMPACT:
☐ None ☒ $42,000 Budgeted Item? ☐Yes ☒ No
Budget Adjustment Needed? ☐Yes ☒ No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): ☒ General Fund ☐ Water OM Fund ☐ Sewer OM Fund ☐ Other:

Comments: Increased solid waste utility rates will provide for an increase in franchise fee and administration/ billing fees to the City. However, it is difficult to quantify how the increased cost can impact the City’s customers and the local economy.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☐ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☒ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☐ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to Set a public hearing on September 3, 2024 for adjustments to Solid Waste Utility Service Rates and direct staff to issue Proposition 218 Notice.
☒ Attachments: 1. Resolution and Proposition 218 Notice

2. July 1, 2021 Solid Waste Utility Service Rates

3. Recommended 2024 Solid Waste Utility Service Rates

4. R3 Report of Franchise Fee Study
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2024)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LAKEPORT SETTING A HEARING REGARDING ADJUSTMENTS TO

RATES FOR SOLID WASTE UTILITY SERVICE
WHEREAS, the City provides solid waste utility service through a Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Yard Waste Collection, Processing, and Disposal Services (Agreement) with Lakeport Disposal Inc. (Lakeport Disposal) dated May 19, 2015; and WHEREAS, Section 6.02 of the Agreement established initial rates of compensation payable to Lakeport Disposal for solid waste utility service; and WHEREAS, Section 6.03 of the Agreement provides for annual adjustments to solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2017 and annually thereafter, based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San Francisco Bay Area (CPI-U) from April to April, as well as other changes in fees and charges imposed by third parties; and WHEREAS, Section 6.03 of the Agreement also provides that annual adjustments to solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2021 and thereafter shall be subject to approval by the City Council after a majority protest hearing as required by XIII D, section 6(a) and Government Code section 53750 of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, solid waste utility service rates were last adjusted July 1, 2021 and no adjustments to solid waste utility service rates were made in 2022 or 2023; and WHEREAS, in September 2023, after a competitive procurement process to select a solid waste services financial consultant, the City engaged R3 Consulting Group, Inc. (R3), to review and analyze Lakeport Disposal’s financial information, revenue and expense projections to determine whether adjustments to solid waste utility service rates were necessary to recover revenue to fund the cost of solid waste utility services provided by Lakeport Disposal; and WHEREAS, through analysis of Lakeport Disposal’s financial information, R3 found that compensation paid to Lakeport Disposal via the solid waste utility service rates effective July 1, 2021 is no longer sufficient to fund the cost of solid waste utility services; and WHEREAS, as of July 1, 2024, it will have been three years since the last adjustment to solid waste utility service rates; and
WHEREAS, , had solid waste utility service rates been adjusted based on the April to April change in CPI-U per the Agreement, the adjustments would have been 5.00% for 2022 and 4.19% for 2023; and
WHEREAS, the April 2023 to April 2024 change in CPI-U was 3.77%; and WHEREAS, the cumulative and compounded change in the CPI-U from April 2021 to April 2024 is 13.52%; and
WHEREAS, R3’s analysis found that a 13.52% adjustment to solid waste utility service rates effective in 2024 would recover revenue to support solid waste utility service within the parameters set by relevant law, including article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to hold a protest hearing on the solid waste utility service rates in accord with article XIII D, section 6(a) of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the City’s local procedures to conduct such a hearing are set forth in Resolution No. 2819(2021).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference.

2. The City Council hereby sets a hearing on the proposed adjustments to solid waste utility service rates at 6:00 pm on September 3, 2024, in the Lakeport City Council Chambers, 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California 95453.

3. City staff is directed to provide notice of this hearing as required by law. The form of this notice is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated by this reference.

THIS RESOLUTION was passed by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular meeting thereof on the 18th day of June, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINING:

ABSENT:
_________________________________
MICHEAL FROIO, Mayor

ATTEST:
_______________________________
KELLY BUENDIA, City Clerk
City of Lakeport
Solid Waste Collection Customers
Public Hearing
September 3, 2024, 6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
225 Park Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
Protests to proposed rates must
be submitted in writing. See
inside for information about how
to submit written protest.

For questions or more information,
please contact:
707-263-5615 or
[email protected]
City of Lakeport225 Park Street Lakeport, CA 95453
Recipient NameAddressCity, ST ZIP Code

PUBLIC NOTICE
Proposed
Solid Waste
Utility Service
Rates
& Public
Hearing
 No Adjustments to Solid Waste
Utility Service Rates Have
Been Made Since 2021
 Current Solid Waste Utility
Rates Fall Short of Cost to
Provide Service
 Recommended Adjustments to
Solid Waste Utility Service
Rates Per Change in
Consumer Price Index

NOTICE OF PROPOSED

SOLID WASTE SERVICE

RATES AND

PUBLIC HEARING
Why Am I Receiving This Notice?
This notice is being furnished to you as a solid waste
services customer in the City of Lakeport, regarding
proposed new monthly rates for solid waste services.

This serves as notice that the Lakeport City Council
will conduct a Public Hearing at the time, date, and
location enclosed to consider recommended solid
waste service rates.

All those interested are invited to appear at the time
and place of the Public Hearing enclosed to give oral
or written testimony or to submit written protests
regarding the proposed rates. The City Council will
hear and consider written materials submitted
regarding proposed rates at the Public Hearing. The
City Council has the authority to adjust the proposed
rate changes in response to oral testimony and
written materials submitted for consideration,
provided that any adjustments cannot increase rates
beyond those listed in this Notice.

Why Are New Solid Waste Utility Service
Rates Needed?
The City of Lakeport contracts with Lakeport
Disposal Company for solid waste (garbage,
recycling, organics and other) services provided to
residents, businesses, and the City. Rates for solid
waste utility services were last adjusted on July 1,
2021. No adjustments to solid waste utility service
rates were made in 2022 or 2023.

In September 2023, the City commissioned a
thorough review and analysis of Lakeport Disposal’s
financial information including revenues and
expenses. The review found that the current 2021
solid waste utility rates are no longer sufficient to
fund the cost of providing solid waste utility services.

Current solid waste service rates are among the
lowest in Lake and Mendocino Counties. Proposed
new solid waste service rates will remain below the
average of other incorporated cities in Lake and
Mendocino Counties for low waste generating
residents and businesses.

Current Solid Waste Utility Rates
Fall Short of Cost to Provide
Service
 Solid waste utility service rates have remained
flat since 2021, with no change in 2022 & 2023.
 Revenues from solid waste utility service rates
no longer cover the cost of providing services.
 Proposed adjustments to solid waste service
rates are based on the change Consumer Price
Index (CPI) from 2021 to 2024.

New Monthly Residential Solid Waste
Utility Service Rates
Can
Size
Current Rates
(effective 7/1/2021
Proposed Rates
(effective 10/1/2024)
Monthly
Change
20-Gal $ 17.54 $ 19.91 $ 2.37
32-Gal $ 25.90 $ 29.40 $ 3.50
95-Gal $ 76.18 $ 86.48 $ 10.30
The full list of current and proposed solid waste utility service rates can be found online at:
https://www.cityoflakeport.com/finance_it_and_utility_account s_and_billing/water,_sewer_and_solid_waste_rates.php
Maximum Annual Adjustments in 2025 and 2026
Solid waste utility service rates will be adjusted on July 1, 2025, and July 1, 2026 based on the terms and
conditions of the City’s Franchise Agreement for
Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable
Materials, and Yard Waste Collection, Processing, and
Disposal Services with Lakeport Disposal.

The Agreement allows for annual adjustments to solid
waste utility service rates based on the percentage
change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers in the San Francisco Bay Area (CPI-U)
from April to April. Over the last 10 years, this change in the CPI-U has ranged from 1.11% to 5.00% and has
averaged 3.4% per year.

How Do I Protest The Proposed
Solid Waste Service Rates?
You have the right to protest the proposed solid
waste service rates. The protest must be in
writing, and it must be submitted by either the
property owner or a current ratepaying tenant. It
must include the property service address and/or
the assessor’s parcel number, the eligible
individual’s name (property owner or tenant), a
statement to the effect of “I protest the proposed
solid waste service rates,” and an original signature.

Written protests may only be submitted by mail or
in-person to the City of Lakeport’s City Clerk at the
City Clerk’s Office, 225 Park Street Lakeport, CA
95453, or during the Public Hearing on Tuesday,
September 3, 2024.

All protests must be received by the City Clerk
before the conclusion of the Public Hearing. The
Clerk will not accept or consider any protest
received after the conclusion of the Public Hearing.

Only one written protest per affected property
will be counted. Telephone, e-mail, and fax
protests will not be accepted.

At the Public Hearing on September 3, 2024, the
City Council will accept and consider all written
protests and hear all oral comments on the
proposed solid waste service rate changes. Oral
comments will not be counted as protests unless
accompanied by a written protest as outlined within
this notice.

Solid waste utility service rates
are billed by the City as part of
your Utility Bill.
→ Pay by phone: 1-833-208-7229
→ Pay by mail:

City of Lakeport – LOCKBOX
PO BOX 1270
Suisun City, CA 94585

Lakeport Disposal
2024 Solid Waste Utility Rates

RESIDENTIAL
2024 Rate Adjustment
to 2021 Rate

COMMERCIAL
2024 Rate Adjustment
to 2021 Rate
Regular billed service Regular billed service
Initial Rate Initial Rate
20 Gallon $ 19.91 $ 20 Gallon (not offered for this class) 2.37 -$ -$ 32 Gallon 29.40 32 Gallon 3.50 28.95 3.45
95 Gallon 86.48 10.30 95 Gallon 86.81 10.34
Additional green waste 12.50 Additional green waste 1.49 14.91 1.78 Cardboard rental bin 76.22 9.08
Regular/Long-term bin rentals Boxes Regular/Long-term bin rentals Boxes Box rental, 14 or 16 yards 216.98 25.84 Box rental, 14 or 16 yards 216.98 25.84 Charge per dump 509.91 60.73 Charge per dump 509.91 60.73 Wood box rental, 14 or 16 yards 216.98 25.84 Wood box rental, 14 or 16 yards 216.98 25.84 per ton when dumped 40.54 per ton when dumped 4.83 40.54 4.83 Bins: Bins:
1 yard bin 1 yard bin
1 x week 203.95 24.29 1 x week 203.95 24.29
2 x week 398.38 47.45 2 x week 398.38 47.45
3 x week 592.81 70.60 3 x week 592.81 70.60
2 yard bin 2 yard bin
1 x week 402.58 47.95 1 x week 402.58 47.95
2 x week 791.44 94.26 2 x week 791.44 94.26
3 x week 1,180.28 140.57 3 x week 1,180.28 140.57

2.5 yard bin 2.5 yard bin
1 x week 501.70 59.75 1 x week 501.70 59.75
2 x week 987.78 117.64 2 x week 987.78 117.64
3 x week 1,473.90 175.54 3 x week 1,473.90 175.54
Overfill per each estimated 1/2 yard 101.98 12.15 Overfill per each estimated 1/2 yard 101.98 12.15 1512 Eureka Road, Suite 220, Roseville, CA 95661 | p 916.782.7821 | f 916.782.7824 | www.r3cgi.com June 12, 2024
Mr. Nicholas Walker
Assistant City Manager / Finance Director
City of Lakeport
submitted via email: [email protected]
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report
Dear Mr. Walker,
R3 Consulting Group, Inc. (R3) is pleased to submit the attached report of Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study (Study) to the City of Lakeport (City). This report presents our analytical methodology, results and findings, and recommendations regarding the solid waste Franchise Fee and Administration Fee paid by the City’s contracted solid waste collection service provider, Lakeport Disposal Inc. (Contractor), per the Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Yard Waste Collection, Processing, and Disposal Services (Agreement) between the City and the Contractor.

The purpose of this Study was to comprehensively analyze and calculate the following:

City’s Costs: The annual costs to the City for performing its billings and collections, management, administration, regulatory compliance and enforcement, solid waste collection and clean-up, and other obligations associated with the Contractor’s Agreement and the sanitation system.

Property Use Charges: The annual use charge to the Contractor for its special and lasting access to use government property in the public right-of-way for placement of solid waste containers and collection of the solid waste contents.

Pavement Impacts: The annualized costs for pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation resulting from the unique impacts to City street pavement caused by the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles during the course of providing sanitation service.

We then compared the calculated values to the annual Franchise Fee and Administration Fee paid by the Contractor to the City per the Agreement. We found that the City’s current and projected Franchise Fee and Administration Fee revenues are less than the sum of the City’s Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impacts calculated in this Study. Based on these results, we conclude that the City’s combined Franchise Fee and Administration Fee is not more than necessary to cover the City’s reasonable costs in billing and collection of solid waste utility rates, managing and administering the Agreement and the sanitation system plus the reasonable value of the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way. In a few instances where we did not receive certain variables, we estimated based on our experience elsewhere.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City. If you have any questions regarding this report or need additional information, please contact me.

Sincerely,

Garth Schultz | Principal
R3 Consulting Group, Inc.
510.292.0853 | [email protected]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report toc - i

1. Executive Summary
page 1

2. Methodology & Calculations
page 4

3. Findings & Conclusions
page 17

4. Recommendations
page 18

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 1 of 18 Background
The City’s Agreement with the Contractor is for the collection, processing, and disposal of solid waste from Contractor’s solid waste service subscribers in the City. The Agreement provides the Contractor with the exclusive right to provide critical aspects of the City’s sanitation system, including solid waste collection and the other services and programs included in the Agreement. The Agreement specifies that the City will charge solid waste service subscribers, with the City billing and collecting revenues from subscribers and the City authorizing the maximum rates that may be charged pursuant to the rate adjustment methodology included in the Agreement.

Per the Agreement, the Contractor is to pay the City a Franchise Fee and an Administration Fee to cover the costs incurred by the City in billing and collecting solid waste utility rates and managing, administering, enforcing, and supplementing the services provided in the Agreement, as well as the charge for the use of the public right-of-way for the special and lasting access to use it for set-out and collection of solid waste containers. Payment of Fees is effectuated through the City’s process for payment of compensation to the Contractor, wherein the City remits to the Contractor the amounts collected from solid waste utility ratepayers, less the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee amounts, which are currently set at 10% and 4% of gross ratepayer revenues, respectively.

Purpose
The purpose of this Study is to identify the amounts that may be reasonably recovered through the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee paid by the Contractor to the City are exempt from consideration as taxes. In terms of the applicable legal framework, this analysis seeks to quantify whether amounts that may be reasonably recovered through the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee paid by the Contractor to the City fall within an exemption to the definition of a tax per Article XIII C, Section 1(e) of the California Constitution (“Proposition 26”).

There are three primary exceptions to the Proposition 26 definition of tax that are relevant:

Exception 1: “A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.” Exception 2: “A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.” Exception 3: “A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.” Exception 4: “A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property.” The Franchise Fee is a fee with three components. The first component includes the City’s proportionate costs (City’s Costs) and is a legal fee per Exceptions 1, 2 and 3. The second component includes the proportionate charges for the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way (Property Use Charges) and is a legal fee per Exception 4. The third component includes the City’s proportionate costs associated with pavement impacts (Pavement Impacts) and is a legal fee per Exception 1. The Administration Fee includes the City’s proportionate costs for its direction provision of billing and collection services for the solid waste utility and is a legal fee per Exception 2. For the purposes of this Study, the City’s Costs component of the Franchise Fee are combined with the Administration Fee, which is appropriate given that there is overlap in these categories.

Executive Summary
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 2 of 18 Methodology and Findings
To complete this Study, R3 reviewed and analyzed information provided by the City and the Contractor pertaining to the City’s Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impacts. Using that information, we then calculated the proportionate amounts necessary to cover the City’s costs, including staffing and other costs; use of government property in the public right-of-way; and pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs caused by the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles during the course of providing sanitation service. All calculated amounts in this Study are in current Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 dollars unless otherwise specified.

City’s Costs
The annual costs for utility billing, collection, management, administration, regulatory compliance and enforcement, solid waste collection and clean-up, and other obligations associated with the Contractor’s Agreement and the sanitation system includes: staffing salary and benefits, contracted services, capital and equipment depreciation, operations and maintenance, supplies, and overhead for distributed costs including but not limited to property, utilities, insurance, human resources, payroll administration, accounts payable and receivable, and other finance functions.

Staffing costs are calculated based on estimated time allocations (based on historical experience and the assessment of current City employees) and other costs are calculated based on estimated share allocations associated with the sanitation system, with distributed overhead applied to both.

The calculation results are $112,403 in staffing costs for annual proportionate City’s Costs totaling $112,403.

Property Use Charges
The annual charge to the Contractor for use of government property in the public right-of-way is calculated as a function of estimates for the number of solid waste accounts setting out solid waste collection containers in the right-of-way, the set-out area used, the amount of time it is used, and the market value for the per square foot use of the public right-of-way.

The calculation result for the use of the public right-of-way is a proportionate annual total Property Use Charge of $38,000.

Pavement Impacts
The annualized costs for pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation is calculated based on the proportionate impact to pavement from solid waste collection vehicles compared to other sources of impacts. This calculation accounts for annual repair costs, five-year projections for capital improvement costs, and five-year projections for growth in deferred maintenance. The calculation also accounts for the high loading and slow speed impacts on pavement associated with solid waste collection vehicles.

The calculation result for the proportionate Pavement Impacts caused by Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles during the course of providing sanitation service is an annualized total repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation cost of $216,775.

Conclusions
Franchise Fee & Administration Fee
The FY 2022-23 Franchise Fee was $237,951, the projection for FY 2023-24 is $255,000, and the projection for FY 2024-25 is $289,476. The FY 2022-23 Administration Fee was $59,881, the projection for FY 2023-24 is $55,000, and the projection for FY 2024-25 is $62,436. Taken altogether, the combined Franchise and Administration Fee in FY 2022-23 was $297,831 and is projected to be $310,000 in FY 2023-24 and $351,912 in FY 2024-25.

Executive Summary
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 3 of 18 The sum of FY 2023-24 annual City’s Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impacts calculated in this Study is $367,178, which is $57,178 (18%) higher than the projected combined FY 2023-24 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee and $15,266 (4%) higher than the projected combined FY 2024-25 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee.

The amounts of the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee are therefore not more than necessary to cover the City’s costs incurred in billing and collecting solid waste utility rates, managing and administering the Agreement and the sanitation system plus the value of the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way.

Reasonableness of Estimates and Assumptions
In performing calculations, it was necessary to estimate certain values for which reasonable ranges exist.

Where assumptions were necessary for completing calculations, our objective was to apply assumptions on the lower end of the reasonable range.

Had we used other higher assumptions, the results of this Study would have been higher calculated amounts of City’s Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impacts. Therefore, we conclude that the calculated fee amounts are not higher than necessary to cover the City’s reasonable costs plus the reasonable value of the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way.

Limitations
This Study relies on information provided by the City and the Contractor, which we have reviewed and analyzed for reasonableness and accuracy but did not independently audit or verify.

As stated above, it was necessary to estimate certain values for which reasonable ranges are known to exist. Though changes to estimates and other underlying assumptions may materially change the calculations, we have elected to apply estimates on the low end of reasonable ranges, thus minimizing the potential that changes in calculations would result in different ultimate findings. We have reviewed estimates and assumptions with City staff and legal counsel and have mutual concurrence on applicability and reasonableness of all such values in this Study.

Finally, the methodology employed by this Study calculates the reasonable values for the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee within the context of current laws, regulations, and court rulings. Changes in the legal framework may require revisions to the methodology and findings contained in this Study.

2. METHODOLOGY & CALCULATIONS
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 4 of 18 City’s Costs
Methodology
R3 reviewed and analyzed information provided by the City pertaining to the General Fund costs incurred for billing and collection, management, administration, regulatory compliance and enforcement, solid waste collection and clean-up, and other obligations associated with the Contractor’s Agreement and the sanitation system.

These costs include and may not be limited to:

Staffing costs, including salaries and benefits.

Contracted services.

Capital and equipment depreciation.

Capital and equipment operations and maintenance.

Supplies and materials.

Overhead for distributed costs such as property, utilities, insurance, human resources, payroll administration, accounts payable and receivable, and other finance functions.

Using the total annual salary, benefits, and other cost information provided by the City, we estimated the proportion of costs associated with management and administration of the agreement and the sanitation system. We then calculated the proportionate totals and categorized them by the functions listed in the sections below.

Variables, Estimates and Assumptions
Staffing Costs
Variables associated with salaries and benefits include the allocation of time that positions are dedicated to management and administration of the Agreement and the sanitation system (including time supervising others with primary responsibility for these duties), the amount by which funding of salaries and benefits is paid by the General Fund, and the applicable amount of General Fund overhead. The estimated time allocation by position category used in this Study (and based on historical experience) is shown in Table 1, below and on the following page, along with the explanation for the allocation values and the percentage of time that each position is funded by the General Fund. Attachment 1 further details the summarized information in Tables 1 and 2 in the following pages.

Table 1: Allocations of Staffing Time by Position
Positions Time
Allocation Explanation
City Manager (60% General Fund)
and City Attorney (40% General
Fund).
5% Estimated indirect time allocation for management
and administration of the City’s sanitation utility.

Public Works Director (60%
General Fund), Finance Director
(40% General Fund), Government
Accountant (40% General Fund)
10%
Estimated time allocation for management and
administration of the Agreement with Contractor,
provision of solid waste utility billing and collection services, and public sanitation services including litter removal, illegal dumping abatement, catch basin
waste removal and other activities associated with the
sanitation utility.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 5 of 18 Positions Time
Allocation Explanation
Maintenance Worker I (3 total 60%
General Fund)) and Parks
Maintenance Worker 1 (3 total
100% General Fund)
20%
Estimated time allocation for public works and parks
sanitation services including litter removal, illegal
dumping abatement, catch basin waste removal and
other activities associated with the sanitation utility.

Finance Services Specialist II
(60% General Fund) 50% Estimated time allocation for solid waste utility service billing and collection services.

R3 verified with City staff that the salaries and benefits included in this Study are paid by the General Fund – any non-General Fund portions of positions included in Table 1 have been excluded from the calculations. A General Fund overhead rate of 10% (estimated by R3 as a minimum for the for distributed costs such as property, utilities, insurance, human resources, payroll administration, accounts payable and receivable, and other finance functions) is also applied to the total allocated costs.

Analysis
Direct Management and Administration
This category includes City staffing costs for direct management and administration of the Agreement and the sanitation system, which also includes solid waste utility billing and collection services paid by the Administration Fee. The Study calculated $45,490 in annual staffing costs, for total calculated costs in this category of $45,490.

Indirect Management and Administration
This category includes City staffing costs for indirect management and administration, including supervision of those responsible for direct management and administration of the Agreement and the sanitation system and associated responsibilities. The Study calculated $8,315 in annual staffing costs, for total calculated costs in this category of $8,315.

Illegal Dumping and Other Solid Waste Clean-up
The City’s Public Works maintenance crews clean up solid waste materials that are illegally dumped throughout the City, which may include litter, debris in catch basins, street sweeping, and other solid waste collection and clean-up activities. The Study calculated $58,598 in annual staffing costs, for total calculated costs in this category of $58,598.

Annual Total of City’s Costs
Table 2, on the following page, shows the total of the City’s Costs for management and administration of the Agreement and the sanitation system as calculated in this Study, by category.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 6 of 18 Table 2: City’s Annual Costs by Category and in Total
Category Staffing Costs
Direct Management and
Administration $45,490
Indirect Management and
Administration $8,315
Illegal Dumping and Other
Solid Waste Clean-up $58,598
Total Annual City’s Costs $112,403
Property Use Charges
Methodology
R3 reviewed and analyzed information provided by the City and the Contractor pertaining to Property Use Charges for Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way for collection of solid waste collection containers.

They then calculated the annual Property Use Charges based on:

The setout area used for collection of solid waste containers (in square feet).

The amount of time that the area is used.

The market value for use of the public right-of-way (in dollars per square foot).

The number of solid waste subscribers setting out collection containers in the public right-ofway.

Using these values, we calculated the market value for the Contractor’s use of government property in the City.

Variables, Estimates, and Assumptions
Setout Area
Standard residential solid waste collection setouts include three solid waste collection containers, usually carts with wheels and lids, with one each for garbage, recycling, and organics waste streams. The setout area needed for placement of these containers is inclusive of the width of each container (typically two feet) as well as minimum required space between the containers and other objects such as cars (minimum of one feet). The set-out area also takes up available parking space and is, thus, assumed to extend six feet out from the curb. Taken altogether, the area for residential setouts is calculated as three containers that are each two feet wide, plus one foot between each container and other objects, for a total area ten feet wide times six feet in depth. The result is 60 square feet of setout area per serviced singlefamily residential property.

The amount of area used for commercial setouts (in this Study, use of the term commercial also always includes multi-family) can vary widely, as there is no standard commercial subscription size profile – each commercial solid waste subscriber can select from a range of container sizes, with most of them being larger than the containers used in residential areas. Given this complexity, this Study assumes that the average commercial setout area is twice that of the residential setout area, for 120 square feet.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 7 of 18 Commercial solid waste containers, especially the metal bin-type containers, range in size from one cubic yard to four cubic yards (which are approximately two to eight times the volume of the largest residential containers) and are thus typically much larger in footprint area than residential containers. Additionally, commercial subscribers can and often do use a greater number of containers than residential customers.

For these reasons we conclude that our assumption of 120 square feet for commercial setouts (twice the residential setout) is likely lower than the average setout area needed in commercial areas and is, therefore, conservative. If detailed information about the number and type of commercial containers were available, it is likely that information would support setout areas larger than the 120 square feet assumed in this Study.

Setout Time Usage
Standard residential solid waste collection is performed once weekly. Most residential containers are set out the evening prior to collection and are removed from the public right-of-way the following afternoon.

Thus, for the purposes of this Study, we assume that collection containers are in the public right-of-way for an average of 18 hours per day, one day per week, which amounts to approximately 10.71% of the time (18 hours divided by 24 per day divided by 7 days per week).

Commercial solid waste subscription setout times can vary widely – just as there is no standard commercial subscription size profile, likewise there is no standard collection frequency. Commercial solid waste subscribers can select collection frequency between once and six times per week, and with different frequencies for different waste streams. Given this complexity, this Study assumes that the average commercial collection frequently is twice weekly, for 21.42% of the time. As with the setout area, this estimate is likely lower than the average commercial collection frequency and is, therefore, conservative.

Market Value for Use of Public Right-of-Way
To establish the market value for use of the public right-of-way, R3 conducted an online survey of recent purchases of bare land in the City and locally in Lake County. R3 sampled 44 recent sales of bare land in the City, which were sold for a median value of $2.06 per square foot. To that value, R3 added the per square foot value of the City’s street pavement, which is calculated as a function of the total replacement value of the City’s streets ($35,086,000) divided by the area of the streets in square feet (4,917,122) both of which are contained in the City’s 2022 PMP (see next section). The resultant value of the street improvements is $7.14 per square foot, which, when added to the $2.06 market value of bare land, yields $9.19 per square foot.

This value is then divided by a rental realization rate of 2.55, which was established via online survey of 13 parking space rentals in and around the City, resulting in a total annual per square foot use charge for the public right-of-way of $3.60. This is multiplied by the General Fund overhead rate of 10% to account for distributed costs including but not limited to property, utilities, insurance, human resources, payroll administration, accounts payable and receivable, and other finance functions, with the resulting per square foot value of $3.96. R3 believes this value to be conservative – other methodologies that could have been applied and would have resulted in a higher estimated market value for the use of the public right-of-way. For example, had this Study used “parklet rental fee” charges established in other California communities, with an approximate average annual per square foot value of $15.00 per square foot, the results from this Study would be higher than estimated herein.

Number of Subscriptions Setting Out Containers
The City reports that there are 1,627 residential and 143 commercial solid waste service subscribers in the City. However, not all subscribers set out their containers in the public right-of-way for collection all the time. To account for non-setouts (either because subscribers don’t have waste materials to set out or because they receive on-premises service) we assume that only 90% of residential solid waste subscribers set out containers on a regular basis, for a resulting total of 1,464 average residential setouts.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 8 of 18 It is also understood that most commercial subscribers do not set out containers in the public right-of-way, and therefore we conservatively assume that only 5% of commercial subscribers set out containers on a regular basis, for a resulting total of 7 average commercial setouts. It should be noted that the 90% setout estimate for residential customers may be low, and the 5% set-out rate for commercial customers is almost certainly low – were one to take field observations for these values, we believe that the actual rates of set-out would be higher than used for the purposes of this Study.

Analysis and Total Annual Property Use Charges
Calculating the total annual Property Use Charges using the variables, estimates, and assumptions from the prior section is a function of multiplication, as shown in Table 3, below.

Table 3: Calculation of Total Annual Property Use Charges Variable Category Residential Commercial
Grand Total Annual
Property Use Charge
Setout Area 60 SF 120 SF
Setout Time Usage 10.71% 21.42%
Annual Use Charge $3.96 per SF $3.96 per SF
Number of Setouts 1,464 7
Total Annual Property
Use Charges $37,287 $713 $38,000
Pavement Impacts
Methodology
R3 reviewed and analyzed information provided by the City pertaining to Pavement Impacts from the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles. We then calculated estimates of the proportionate share of the average annual pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs associated with solid waste collection vehicles based on the proportionate impact to pavement from solid waste collection vehicle compared to other sources of impacts.

The calculation accounts for the City’s annual repair costs, five-year projections for capital improvement costs, and five-year projections for annualized growth in deferred maintenance. The calculation also accounts for the high loading and slow speed impacts on pavement associated with solid waste collection vehicles.

The calculation proportionately allocates the average annual pavement management costs to solid waste vehicles based on:

The equivalent single-axle load and proportionate impacts from speed for those vehicles compared to other vehicles.

The number of vehicle trips on City streets.

The proportion of vehicle trips that are made by trucks versus automobiles.1 1 Our analysis accounts for the distribution of vehicles among the 13 Federal Highway Administration vehicle classifications, which include passenger cars, SUVs/pick-ups, buses, and multiple truck and truck/trailer axle combinations.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 9 of 18 Variables, Estimates, and Assumptions
The weight, loading, slow speed, and frequent stops that characterize solid waste collection vehicle operations impose unique and quantifiable impacts on the City’s street pavement. It is important to understand that, while calculation of vehicle impacts to pavement can be precise for individual vehicles, out of necessity we made certain assumptions about overall blended pavement impacts associated with several categories of vehicle types for the purposes of this Study. This is because we sought to calculate estimated impacts to all street pavement in the City, covering all vehicle uses, and precise traffic information at that scale is not currently available. Thus, we make informed assumptions regarding several variables necessary for this Study.

For each of these variables, there is a range of potentially reasonable values that may be used. We have selected values at the low end of the reasonable range to present findings that conservatively calculate estimated values of the pavement impacts associated with the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles during the course of providing sanitation service.

Assumptions used are described in the following subsections, which reference sources supporting the summary provided here. We must note that changes in assumptions may result in material changes in calculation results and findings.

Factors Impacting Pavement Conditions
Street pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation needs and their resulting costs are affected by several factors, including vehicle usage and trench cuts and subsurface activities related to underground utilities.

Environmental conditions such as light and water also contribute to pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation needs in combination with the primary impacts from vehicles, trench cuts (for maintenance and repairs to underground utilities), and subsurface activities related to underground utilities. This Study only focuses on the impacts to street pavement from vehicles, and the proportion of those impacts that are attributable to the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles as they perform sanitation service.

City’s Costs for Pavement Repair, Maintenance and Rehabilitation The City regularly projects its costs for repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation of pavement resulting from degradation due to use. These projections, and the basis for them, are documented in Pavement Management Program (PMP) reports which the City commissions with engineering consultants.

Per the City’s December 2022, PMP report, the City’s projected average annual pavement maintenance and rehabilitation costs from 2023 through 2028 for its entire street network, are approximately $285,000.

Also, per the PMP, deferred pavement maintenance on the City’s streets2 (which is the result of degrading pavement conditions associated with the impacts of vehicles) is projected to increase by $11.8 million between 2023 and 2032.3
Axle Loading
Our methodology for calculating the proportionate amount of pavement maintenance, and rehabilitation impacts for the Contractor’s vehicles is grounded in the fact that all vehicles, including solid waste collection 2 Deferred maintenance is planned maintenance that gets delayed and backlogged because of a lack of funding.

Deferred maintenance costs remain on the books until they are funded and the work is completed and recategorized in the City’s PMP.
3 Our analysis assumes funding based on the City’s budgeted pavement maintenance costs as presented in the PMP under Scenario 1 “Existing Funding”.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 10 of 18 vehicles, degrade pavement during use. Measurement of that impact – also known as “vehicle loading” – can be estimated, quantified, and expressed as an Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL), which is a function of the vehicle’s weight and the distribution of that weight over the vehicle’s axles.

It is important to note that heavier vehicles (including solid waste vehicles) have more impacts on pavement and have a higher vehicle loading ESAL value. It is also important to note that ESAL values are associated with vehicle loading only, and not the speed of the vehicle; it is therefore assumed that relative ESAL values between vehicle types are based on vehicles travelling at the same rate of speed.

For this analysis, R3 used the vehicle categories and average ESAL values shown in Table 4, below. Table 4 explains and cites supporting information for how the ESAL for each vehicle type was determined. It should be noted that solid waste collection vehicles are much heavier than most other typical vehicles on City roadways.

Table 4: ESAL Value Assumptions by Vehicle Type
Vehicle Type ESAL
Value Source
Automobiles (Passenger Cars) 0.0008
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials) Design Guide with ESALs by
Vehicle Type
Average of All Other Trucks4 0.0171
Calculated Value Using AASHTO Design Guide with
ESALs by Vehicle Type, Federal Highway Administration
ESALs by Vehicle Type, Comparative Traffic Counts
Solid Waste Vehicle (Garbage) 1.0000
Calculated Values by Type Using Example Axle Weights
and AASHTO Axle Load Equivalency Factors Solid Waste Vehicle (Organics) 1.0000 Solid Waste Vehicle (Recycling) 0.7500
Given the assumed ESAL values in Table 4, a solid waste vehicle collecting garbage has 1,250 times the impact of an automobile. We are aware of other research concluding that the impacts of solid waste collection vehicles may be as high as 8,000-9,000 times the impact of passenger cars; thus, our assumed ESAL of “1” for garbage collection vehicles is on the low end of the reasonable range of ESALs for such vehicles.

Speed Impact
Impacts to flexible pavements (which are typical for residential streets) are also influenced by vehicle speeds, with impacts being exponentially higher when a load carrying vehicle is moving at a very slow speed.5 This is demonstrated in Chart 1, on the following page. 4 “All other trucks” means all vehicles with high loading and impact on street pavement other than solid waste vehicles, including pickup trucks, vans, box trucks, and a variety of other trucks with a lower average ESAL than solid waste collection vehicles.
5 Effect of truck speed on the response of flexible pavement systems to traffic loading; International Journal of Pavement Engineering, July 2020; Michael R. S. Mshali and Wynand JvdM. Steyn.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 11 of 18 Chart 1: Exponential Relationship Between Speed and Pavement Impacts Unlike typical traffic on residential streets, which tends to travel at or near the posted speed limit (25 miles per hour [mph] in the City), solid waste vehicles slow and stop for collection in front of each household, averaging approximately 4 mph to 8 mph.6 At these low speeds, and as shown in Chart 1, vehicles have approximately 2.2 to 2.6 times the impact to the pavement than they would travelling only at the 25 mph speed limit.

In this Study we conservatively assume that solid waste vehicles in the City may be travelling at a faster 10 mph average speed, and we thus assume that the relative impact of speed is a factor of 2, not the higher

2.2 to 2.6 factors corresponding with slower speeds as noted above. We apply this speed factor of 2 as a multiplier to the ESAL loading for solid waste collection vehicles in our analysis of impacts to residential streets only; the factor is not applied to the ESAL loading for arterial and collector streets, as those streets are not typically comprised of flexible pavements, solid waste collection vehicles stop less frequently on those streets (and thus have a higher average speed).

Vehicle Passes Per Day
By estimating the number and type of vehicles (i.e., solid waste collection vehicles, automobiles, and all other trucks) that travel on a street, and the average pavement impacts (measured in ESAL loading) associated with each vehicle type (described in the prior subsection), the total impacts that the pavement will experience can be estimated in a mathematical calculation. Our analysis makes informed assumptions about the number of vehicle passes (meaning trips down streets) by type for the two major types of streets identified by the City in its PMP. Those two types of streets are: high-traffic-volume streets (namely arterial and collector streets) and low-traffic-volume streets (residential streets). Specific data for the City relating to the number of vehicle passes per day and the proportion of those passes that are comprised of trucks was not available for this Study.

For the low-traffic residential streets, we used an estimate of 1,500 vehicle passes per day. We also estimated that 5% of residential traffic trips were made by trucks. For arterial and collector streets, we used an estimate of 15,000 passes per day. The 1,500 passes per day for residential streets and 15,000 passes per day for arterial and collector streets figures are conservative. In other comparative communities the 6 Real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions of heavy-duty compressed natural gas refuse trucks; Science of the Total Environment 761, 2021; Gurdas S. Sandhu, H. Christopher Frey, Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, Elizabeth Jones.

0.00 0.50

1.00 1.50

2.00 2.50

3.00 3.50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Relative Impact
Average Speed (MPH)
Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 12 of 18 actual passes per day are less than these figures. For example, in the County of Sonoma, the values are 784 passes on residential streets (approximately one half of the values assumed in this Study) and 3,980 passes on commercial and arterial streets (less than one third of the values in this Study). On the other end of the range, in the City of Anaheim, which is much larger than the City and with high levels of tourism, has approximately 3,000 passes on residential streets (twice the assumptions used in this Study), and 25,000 passes on commercial and arterial streets (less than twice the assumptions used in this Study). With these known data points, and given the size, demographics and geographics of the City, we conclude that, were specific vehicle traffic counts available for City streets, the actual vehicle passes would be less than the assumptions used in this Study. In that case, the outcome would be a greater proportionate impact from solid waste collection vehicles than calculated via this Study.

For the percentage of those trips that are trucks, we used a calculated value based on comparative traffic counts from the City of Torrance in 2023 and which is the same dataset that we used to estimate the average ESAL for “All other trucks” in Table 4. That dataset calculates the average daily traffic counts for all vehicles on commercial streets in that city, with 87.7% of the average daily traffic count being comprised of passenger cars and motorcycles and the remaining 12.3% being comprised of trucks.

For the purposes of this Study, we have assumed an even higher percentage of arterial and collector street traffic being trucks, at 15% of the average daily traffic. As with the prior assumptions, this value is conservative in that it returns a low proportionate value for the impacts to streets from the Contractor’s solid waste vehicles. Table 5, below, is a summary of the assumptions used in this Study related to average daily vehicles passes and the percentage that are trucks assumptions used in this Study.

Table 5: Vehicle Passes Per Day by Street Type
Street Type Vehicle Passes Per Day Percentage of Vehicle Passes That Are Trucks
Residential 1,500 5%
Arterial and Collector 15,000 15%
Vehicle Passes By Vehicle Type
The variables described in the prior subsection provide the overall number of vehicle passes per day, and the percentage of those passes that are trucks. To isolate the vehicle loading impacts to pavement associated with solid waste collection vehicles, we need to determine the number of passes that those vehicles make per day. This is a relatively simple calculation based on the weekly schedule of collections for solid waste collection services.

For the low-traffic residential streets, solid waste collection operations are on a weekly schedule. Since weekly collections are on both sides of the street, each street is driven twice (once in each direction) by a minimum of one of each type of solid waste collection vehicle. For the purposes of this Study, we assume that each solid waste collection vehicle makes two passes per week, or 0.286 passes per day, on residential streets. This value does not account for the fact that some streets are driven on during nonroute days so that collection vehicles can access streets on a given route, meaning that the actual average passes per week in the City must be higher than stated above.

Using the lower passes per week is conservative in that it returns a lower result for the street impacts from the Contractor’s solid waste vehicles. For the high-traffic arterial and collector streets, which are primarily commercial, the schedule for solid waste collection can vary. Solid waste collection services may Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 13 of 18 be provided up to five or six times a week for larger waste generators, and may be as low as weekly for smaller generators. Additionally, because solid waste generators in commercial areas are not all on the same collection schedules as residential accounts are, vehicles in commercial areas pass over the same streets multiple times to serve accounts with different collection schedules.

For the purposes of this Study, for arterial and collector streets, we assume that solid waste collection vehicles collecting garbage for landfill disposal pass over each street two times per day (once in each direction), while solid waste collection vehicles for organics and recycling pass over each street once per day (one half in each direction). Total passes for organics and recycling collection vehicles are less because it is generally the case that service levels for garbage are at least twice those of the corresponding organics or recycling service level. As with the number of passes on residential streets, this value does not account for the fact that some streets are driven on during non-route days so that collection vehicles can access streets on a given route, meaning that the actual average passes per week in the City must be higher than stated above. Using the lower passes per week is conservative in that it returns a lower result for the pavement impacts from the Contractor’s solid waste vehicles.

The number of passes per day for the remaining vehicle types – automobiles and other trucks – are simply calculated as a function of the total number of daily passes, the total number of those that are trucks (based on the percentages discussed in the prior section), and the number of passes for solid waste collection vehicles. For example, for the City’s residential streets, given the assumed 1,500 passes per day and 5% (75) of those being trucks, there are 1,425 automobile passes per day (1,500 x 95%).

With three types of solid waste collection vehicles each passing 0.286 times per day (as described above), the total passes per day are 0.857 (3 x 0.286). The number of passes for all other trucks is

74.143 (150 minus 0.857). Table 6, below, provides a summary of vehicle passes per day by street type.

Table 6: Vehicle Passes Per Day by Vehicle Type and Street Type Vehicle Type Residential Streets Arterial and Collector Streets Automobiles (Passenger Cars) 1,425.000 12,750.000
Average of All Other Trucks 74.142 2,247.143
Solid Waste Vehicle (Garbage) 0.286 1.429
Solid Waste Vehicle (Organics) 0.286 0.714
Solid Waste Vehicle (Recycling) 0.286 0.714
Total 1,500 15,000
Percentage of Streets by Type
A final variable that needs to be addressed in the percentage of streets by type. This information is included in the City’s PMP, including the relative area by street type, as shown in Table 7, below.

Table 7: Percentage of Streets by Type
Street Type Area (Square Feet) Percentage of Area
Residential 1,886,798 38.4%
Arterial 1,546,129 31.4%
Collector 1,484,195 30.2%
Total 4,917,122 100%
Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 14 of 18 Analysis
Percentage Impact for Solid Waste & Street Sweeping Vehicles by Street Type With the variables for ESAL by vehicle type, the multiplication factor for the relative impacts of speed for solid waste collection vehicles on residential streets, and the number of passes by vehicle type established, we then calculate the relative percentage impact associated with each vehicle type. This is calculated as a function of ESAL multiplied by speed factor (residential streets only) multiplied by the number of weekly passes, multiplied by ESAL, with the product being the total vehicle loading pavement impact by vehicle type per week.

Totaling the weekly total vehicle loading by vehicle types yields the total estimated loading experienced by each street type (residential vs. arterial and collector). From there, we calculate the percentage contribution to total vehicle loading for solid waste collection vehicles, which is the total weekly ESAL loading associated with solid waste collection vehicles divided by the total ESAL loading for the street.

Table 8, below, and Table 9, on the following page, show these calculations and the results.

Table 8: Calculation of Solid Waste Pavement Impacts – Residential Streets

A B C D E F
Vehicle Type
Average
ESAL /
Vehicle
(Per Table
4)
Relative
Impact
from
Speed
Passes /
Day /
Vehicle
Type
(Per Table
6)
Passes /
Week /
Vehicle
Type
(C x 7)
Total
Weekly
ESAL
Loading
(A x B x D)
Percent of
Total
ESAL
Loading
(E / 27.85)
Automobiles 0.0008 1x 1,425.00 9,975 7.98 28.65%
All Other Trucks 0.0171 1x 74.14 519 8.88 31.87 %
Garbage Vehicles 1.0000 2x 0.286 2 4.00 14.36%
Organic Material Vehicles 1.0000 2x 0.286 2 4.00 14.36% Recycling Vehicles 0.7500 2x 0.286 2 3.00 10.77%
Total 1,500 10,500 27.86 100%
As shown in Table 8, for the City’s residential streets we calculated the percentage impacts for solid waste vehicles to be 39.49% of total impacts to residential street pavement (14.36% times 2 plus 10.77%).

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 15 of 18 Table 9: Calculation of Solid Waste Vehicle Impacts – Arterial and Collector Streets

A B C E F
Vehicle Type
Average
ESAL /
Vehicle
(Per Table 4)
Passes /
Day /
Vehicle Type
(Per Table 6)
Passes /
Week /
Vehicle Type
(B x 7)
Total Weekly
ESAL
Loading
(A x C)
Percent of
Total ESAL
Loading
(E / 359.13)
Automobiles 0.0008 12,750.00 89,250 71.4 19.88%
All Other Trucks 0.0171 2,247.14 15,730 268.98 74.9%
Garbage Vehicles 1.0000 1.429 10 10.00 2.78%
Organic Material Vehicles 1.0000 0.714 5 5.00 1.39%
Recycling Vehicles 0.7500 0.714 5 3.75 1.04%
Total 15,000 105,000 359.13 100%
For the City’s arterial and collector streets, Table 9 calculates the percentage impact from solid waste vehicles to be 5.21% of the total impacts (2.78% plus 1.39% plus 1.04%).

Average Annual Pavement Expenses
Per the PMP report, the City is projected to spend $285,000 per year on pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation. These amounts are not included for the purposes of this Study as they are likely funded from existing dedicated funding sources other than the General Fund.

Average Annualized Deferred Maintenance
In addition to contributing to annual pavement maintenance and rehabilitation costs, solid waste vehicles also contribute to deferred maintenance. The PMP report projects that deferred maintenance will increase by $11.8 million from 2023 to 2032, which is $1,311,111 annually.

Reduction for Pavement Subsurface Impacts
The City’s projected expenditures for pavement maintenance repair are assumed to include impacts to pavement caused by vehicles, trench cutting, and subsurface activities, as well as the environmental impacts associated with those same sources of primary impacts. We roughly estimate the impacts of trench cutting and subsurface activities on the City’s streets to be 10% of all pavement repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs. This leaves 90% of the average annual pavement management costs and average annualized deferred maintenance needs associated with vehicle impacts.

This is demonstrated in Table 10, on the following page.

Methodology & Calculations
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 16 of 18 Table 10: Average Annual Pavement Impacts from Vehicles Category Amount of Impacts
from All Sources
Reduction for
Subsurface Activities
Amount of Impacts
from Vehicles
Average Annualized
Deferred Maintenance $1,311,111 -10% $1,180,000
Table 11, below, shows the breakdown of the average annual pavement impacts from all vehicles by street type, using the total from Table 10.

Table 11: Total Pavement Impacts from Vehicles by Street Type Variable Residential Arterial and Collector Total
Percentage of Streets
by Type (From Table 7) 38.4% 61.6% 100%
Total $452,790 $727,210 $1,180,000
Total Annual Pavement Impacts
Calculating the total annual Pavement Impacts using the variables, estimates, and assumptions from the prior section is a function of multiplication, as shown in Table 12, below.

Table 12: Calculation of Total Pavement Impacts from Contractor’s Vehicles Variables Residential Arterial and Collector
Grand Total
Annual Pavement Impacts
from Vehicles (From
Table 11)
$452,790 $727,210
Percentage Impacts from
Contractor’s Vehicles
(From Tables 8 and 9)

39.49% 5.22%
Total $178,808 $37,967 $216,775

3. FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 17 of 18 Franchise Fee & Administration Fee
The FY 2022-23 Franchise Fee was $237,951, the projection for FY 2023-24 is $255,000, and the projection for FY 2024-25 is $289,476.

The FY 2022-23 Administration Fee was $59,881, the projection for FY 2023-24 is $55,000, and the projection for FY 2024-25 is $62,436.

Taken altogether, the combined Franchise and Administration Fee in FY 2022-23 was $297,831 and is projected to be $310,000 in FY 2023-24 and $351,912 in FY 2024-25.

R3 calculated estimates of the City’s Costs and Property Use Charges based on actual and estimated cost information provided by the City, and with reasonable and conservative assumptions for estimated values.

The sum of FY 2023-24 annual City’s Costs ($112,403), Property Use Charges ($38,000), and Pavement Impacts ($216,775) calculated in this Study is $367,178.

Where assumptions were necessary to complete the analysis in this Study, reasonable attempts were made to apply conservative assumptions given a range of possible inputs.

The calculated amounts bear a reasonable relationship to the Contractor’s burdens on the City resulting from the management and administration of the Agreement and the sanitation system, and the reasonable value of the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way. The City’s Costs have been reviewed and confirmed by City staff as being representative of the actual time and costs incurred for these activities. Amounts of Property Use Charges are proportionately allocated to the Contractor with due recognition of the realities of the Contractor’s operations.

The amounts calculated in this Study are $57,178 (18%) higher than the projected FY 2023- 24 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee amounts and $15,266 (4%) higher than the projected FY 2024-25 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee. It is highly unlikely, given the justification provided herein, that FY 2024-25 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee will exceed the amounts calculated in this Study.

The projected FY 2024-25 Franchise Fee and Administration Fee are less than would be justified by the calculations in this Study.

The Franchise Fee and Administration Fee are therefore is not more than necessary to cover the City’s costs incurred in billing and collecting solid waste utility rates, managing and administering the Agreement and the sanitation system plus the value of the Contractor’s use of the public right-of-way.

4. RECOMMENDATIONS
City of Lakeport | Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study – R3 Report 18 of 18 Restate Franchise Fee & Administration Fee
The current Franchise Fee and Administration Fees are calculated based on of gross revenues collected from billings in the City. While these amounts do not exceed the City Costs, Property Use Charges and Pavement Impact values calculated in this Study, the City would be better served by restating them to be a dollar value instead of a percentage of gross revenues.

We recommend that the City consider amending the Agreement with the Contractor to set the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee at a dollar value not to exceed the sum of the City Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impact values calculated by this Study.

Annual Adjustments
All values calculated in this Study are in current FY 2023-24 dollars. Given that the City’s Costs, Property Use Charges, and Pavement Impacts will all tend to change over time in response to changing staffing, benefits, and other costs, it would be appropriate for the City to implement an annual adjustment to the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee.

R3 recommends the City consider including an automatic annual adjustment that would change the fees in proportion to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

We recommend the CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the San Francisco Bay Area (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics series ID: CUURS49BSA0). The City’s current Agreement with Contractor already accounts for this inflationary adjustment.

Sources and Uses Accounting
Currently, the City’s Costs and Property Use Charges are not tied to Franchise Fee and Administration Fee revenues in the City’s accounting system. The City could implement project code accounting and/or enterprise fund accounting for the Franchise Fee and Administration Fee to better track source revenues and their uses. In either case, allocated and/or direct staffing and other costs could be tied to source revenues, while the Property Use Charges could be transferred out for general use.

R3 recommends the City consider implementing sources and uses accounting practices for Franchise Fee and Administration Fee revenues, City’s Costs, and Property Use Charges.

Periodic Recalculation
Over time, the City’s Costs associated with the Agreement and the sanitation system, the value of Property Use Charges for use of the public right-of-way, and the annualized costs associated with Pavement Impacts from the Contractor’s solid waste collection vehicles may change in ways that vary from the annual change in the CPI. Additionally, changes in City policies, programs, procedures, organization, geopolitical boundaries, laws, regulations, court rulings, and/or other factors may also trigger a need for recalculating fees.

R3 recommends the City consider updating this Study periodically (e.g., every five years) or more frequently if needed to recalculate fees in response to other factors.

Solid Waste Cost Recovery Category Title
Estimated Time
on Solid Waste
Related Matters
General Fund
Percentage FY 23/24 Salary FY 23/24 Benefits
FY 23/24 Fully
Burdened Costs
(Salary +
Benefits
FY 23/24
General Fund
Overhead
Allocation
FY 23/24 Total
Solid Waste
Related Costs
Indirect Management & Administration City Manager 5.0% 60% $ 149,292 $ 41,380 $ 190,672 $ 19,067 $ 6,292 Indirect Management & Administration City Attorney 5.0% 40% $ 72,000 $ 19,957 $ 91,957 $ 9,196 $ 2,023 Direct Management & Administration Public Works Director 10.0% 60% $ 118,788 $ 32,925 $ 151,713 $ 15,171 $ 10,013 Direct Management & Administration Finance Director 10.0% 40% $ 135,252 $ 37,489 $ 172,741 $ 17,274 $ 7,601 Direct Management & Administration Financial Services Specialist II 50.0% 60% $ 54,516 $ 15,111 $ 69,627 $ 6,963 $ 22,977 Direct Management & Administration Government Accountant 10.0% 40% $ 87,192 $ 24,168 $ 111,360 $ 11,136 $ 4,900 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Parks Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 100% $ 42,300 $ 11,725 $ 54,025 $ 5,402 $ 11,885 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 60% $ 45,360 $ 12,573 $ 57,933 $ 5,793 $ 7,647 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 60% $ 45,360 $ 12,573 $ 57,933 $ 5,793 $ 7,647 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 60% $ 45,360 $ 12,573 $ 57,933 $ 5,793 $ 7,647 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Parks Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 100% $ 42,300 $ 11,725 $ 54,025 $ 5,402 $ 11,885 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention Parks Maintenance Worker I 20.0% 100% $ 42,300 $ 11,725 $ 54,025 $ 5,402 $ 11,885 Row Labels Sum of FY 23/24 Total Solid Waste Related Costs CalRecycle & SB 1383 Compliance, Implementation & Enforcement $ - Catch Basin Waste Removal $ -City Events Solid Waste Collection $ -Direct Management & Administration $ 45,490 Illegal Dumping Response, Clean-up, Mitigation, & Prevention $ 58,598Indirect Management & Administration $ 8,315 Municipal Code Enforcement $ -
Pavement Repair, Maintenance, & Rehabilitation $ -Public Solid Waste Receptable Collection $ -Street Sweeping $ -Tree Trimming for Large Vehicle Curbside Access $ -Grand Total $ 112,403 Meeting Date: 6/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item #

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Financing Authority
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport

STAFF REPORT
RE: Utilities Update - Projects MEETING DATE: 06/18/2024 SUBMITTED BY: Paul Harris, Utilities Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

This is an informational only item providing an overview of the current projects associated with water and sewer infrastructure improvements.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

A brief Power Point presentation outlining the highlights and progress of multiple CIP projects outlined in the 2021 rate study.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes No If yes, amount of appropriation increase:

Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☒ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☒ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☒ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☒ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☐ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

None Required – Informational Only
Meeting Date: 6/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item #
Attachments: 1. PPT Slideshow

UTILITIES

PROJECT UPDATES
JUNE 18, 2024
2024 WATER & SEWER MAIN

REPLACEMENT PROJECT
• Lakeport Blvd
• Martin St.
• Lakeshore Blvd
• Tenth & Tunis
• Armstrong
• 9,035’ of Water Main
• 5,086 of Sewer Main
Project will begin in August and be
completed by July 2025

WATER WELL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
• In Design - Dudek Engineering
• Replacing 8” Creek Well
• Target date for completion March 2025
4 SODIUM

HYPOCHLORITE

CONVERSION
5 • WWTP In Design-MC Engineering
• Replacing gas chlorine with
sodium hypochlorite
Target date for completion is August
2025
Water conversion to be completed in
house – Target November 2024
GENERATOR INSTALLS – WATER

FACILITIES
• Lake Intake, Surface Water Plant,
Scotts Creek
• HMPG Grant - $158,468
• Bids received and contract award will
be on next council agenda
Completion Date August 2024

MASTER PLAN UPDATES - WATER & SEWER
• In Progress –
Pace
Engineering
• Last plans from
2008
Target date for
completion is July
2025
7 GRANULAR

ACTIVATED CARBON

REPLACEMENT
8 • 2 Vessels at surface water
plant
• Going out to bid later this
month
Target date for completion
September 2024

GREEN RANCH REHABILITATION PROJECT
• Going out to bid in
July
• 2 Wells – Green
Ranch East/Green
Ranch West
Target date for
completion October
2024
9 RECYCLED WATER FEASIBILITY
STUDY
10 • RFP for update in
July 2024
• Update of 2009
Plan
Target Date for
completion is July
2025
Q & A
THANK
YOU
12 Paul Harris
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.D.1.

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Development Agency
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport

STAFF REPORT
RE: Police Statistics & Training Summary Report for 2023, and 2023 Use of Force Annual Report
MEETING DATE: 06/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Captain Dale Stoebe
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to receive and file a report on the Police Statistics and Use of Force Annual Report for 2023, and the annual Police Training Report for fiscal year 2023-2024.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Police Captain will present reports regarding police statistics and training for 2023 to include response times, number of incidents, types of crimes, number of arrests, use of force annual reporting for 2023 and hours and types of officer and staff training for fiscal year 24-25.

OPTIONS:

Receive and file the report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $ Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes X No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:

Comments:

SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to receive and file the Police Statistics & Use of Force Reports for year 2023, and the Police Training Report for fiscal year 2023-2024.

Attachments: 1. 2023 LPD Crime Stats Workbook

2. 2023 Use of Force Annual Report

3. 23-24 Training Report

Brad Rasmussen
Chief of Police

MEMORANDUM
Lakeport Police Department
2025 South Main Street
Lakeport, CA 95453
(707) 263-5491
To: Chief Brad Rasmussen
From: Captain Dale Stoebe
Date: January 1, 2024
Subject: Use of Force Analysis Report - 2023
Pursuant to Lakeport Police Department Policy 300.9, this memo shall serve as the official Annual Use of Force Analysis Report for the calendar year 2023. The 2023 year showed 0 Uses of Force reportable to the California Department of Justice required by California Government Code 12525.2, a 100% decrease in DOJ reportable Use of Force incidents (1).

Pursuant to Lakeport Police Department Policy 300.7.1, Shift Supervisors conducted 15 separate Use of Force reviews (not reportable to DOJ) as required by California Penal Code Section 7286 (b)(14), resulting from 15 separate calls for service. These thorough reviews found that all Uses of Force were reasonable, justified and fully compliant with Policy, State and Federal law.

Pursuant to the recommendations made in previous Use of Force Analysis Report, the following implementations continued during this reporting period:
a). In-house Firearms Training, at least once annually, included force transition training and simulation between firearms and other available force options, consistent with the employees’ duty assignments. Additional training contained elements of multiple officers with force transitions, including both use of force and noforce options based on successful de-escalation tactics.

Brad Rasmussen
Chief of Police
b.) In-house Less Lethal Force training, at least once annually, contained similar elements as described above.
c.) Preparation has begun to include similar elements in InHouse Defensive Tactics training, as well.

I do not believe that the department has any equipment needs as the Lakeport Police department has available, issues, and maintains several force options, spanning a broad array of force levels, for use by police staff including chemical spray, chemical deployables, batons, new-technology electronic less lethal devices, less lethal deployables, handguns, shotguns, and patrol rifles. Although there is other equipment on the market, our array is more than appropriate relative to the instances and levels of force historically required. The Department has also assigned a Sworn Officer to a recently developed Multi-County, Multi-Jurisdictional Special Weapons and Tactics Team, leveraging our participation and support to better prepare a needed response to matters demanding a more robust and emergent tactical need.

Additionally, the Department continues to use a suite of information gathering applications designed to increase efficiency of in-house Supervisory reviews of force, vehicle pursuits, employee conduct and police vehicle damage, with the goal of incorporating that and other information in a Performance History Audit and Early Intervention Program, still in development.

Lastly, I conducted a quarterly review of department policy, including any suggested policy changes, deletions and/or additions received from our third-party policy consultant, Lexipol, that have been provided during the previous four-quarters, giving primary attention to critical policy updates, and then any use of force policy suggestions. Relative to policy training, policy Daily Training Bulletins (DTBs), which regularly include Use of Force specific policies topics, are pushed out to all department employees, monthly.

Supervisory oversight of policy review and training is conducted on an on-going basis to ensure that policy changes are reviewed and acknowledged, and DTBs are completed in a timely manner.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council ☒
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District ☒
Lakeport Industrial Development Authority ☐
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport ☐

STAFF REPORT
RE: 2024-25 Budget Adoption MEETING DATE: 06/18/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Ingram City Manager
Nicholas Walker, ACM/Finance Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: ☐Information only ☐ Discussion ☒Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to approve the operating and capital expenditure budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year and adopt the associated resolution.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The fiscal year 2024/25 budget can best be described as challenged. Although balanced, sluggish revenues and rising costs have left it relatively void of new capital improvement projects and programs. The City has experienced seven straight quarters of stagnant to slightly declining revenues in sales tax, its largest revenue source, which makes up nearly 60% of total City revenues. Concurrently, expenses and costs for construction and service delivery continue to rise, most dramatically in the areas of insurance, medical benefits, and pension obligations, which in some cases have nearly doubled compared to their 2019 levels. This places significant strain on City resources.

Inflation affects the City budget much like it does our household budgets. The combined effect of rising costs and stagnant revenues forces us to make difficult choices, as our dollars buy less than they did in years past. Despite these challenges, the proposed budget maintains its financial commitments, including a fully-staffed police force and the continuation of special programs such as the Central Business District & Parks Liaison Officer and School Resource Officer programs. Additionally, we are focusing on completing larger capital improvement projects aimed at improving key roadway segments and upgrading the water and wastewater systems through the replacement of critical water and sewer mains.

Key projects include the $1.2 million South Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project, which will replace pavement and enhance sidewalks and pedestrian crossings from Lakeport Boulevard to First Street, and the $8 million Water and Sewer Line Replacement Project. City staff continues to be aggressive in pursuing grant opportunities, which remains the best means to address large capital improvement projects beyond the scope of the City's annual budget. Strategic plans such as the Navigation Center Needs Study, Housing Services Master Plan, and Local Active Transportation Plan for Pedestrian Improvements aim to make the City eligible for various state and federal funding sources.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Efforts to revitalize vacant buildings and shopping centers remain a priority, not only to address blight but also to increase revenue opportunities. Lakeport’s strongest economic feature is its position as the regional employment, shopping, and service center. Leveraging the beauty of the new park, another priority is developing a waterfront hotel at the Dutch Harbor property adjacent to the park on Main Street.

The long reach of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reverberate through our monetary systems and social fabric. The City of Lakeport is fortunate to have many service and nonprofit organizations, and super dedicated volunteers. However, the past couple of years have severely affected the membership and monetary resources of these groups, making it difficult for them to perform their beneficial functions. Despite this, our civic organizations remain committed to community service. To address these concerns, the City Council is exploring the development of a community civic engagement effort aimed at creating a forum for existing organizations to band together, share information and resources to enhance their collective community service mission—to make Lakeport the most desirable location to live, work, and play.

Key Goals for Fiscal Year 2024/25
• Successfully complete the 2024 Water and Sewer Main Line Replacement Project: Utilize $8 million to replace approximately two miles of water main and one mile of sewer main across the city, ensuring improved infrastructure reliability and service delivery to our residents. • Enhance the City’s Pavement Management Program: Execute the 2024/25 roadway capital improvement plan, including:
o Renovation of South Main Street (Lakeport Boulevard to First Street) to address sidewalk gaps, improve pedestrian crossings, and enhance roadway surfacing. o Drafting design specifications and bid documents for microsurfacing projects on North High Street (Clear Lake Avenue to Lakeshore Boulevard, Charlie Jolin Way, and Parallel Drive (City Limits to Lakeport Boulevard).
o Implementing the Del Lago local neighborhood chip seal project. • Support the Transition of the Police Chief Position: Ensure a smooth transition to maintain community policing initiatives while fostering a supportive environment to boost the morale and professional development of our young police force.
• Complete the Navigation Center Feasibility Study: Identify viable sites, operational requirements, and funding avenues for establishing a low-barrier navigation center to improve access to services for individuals experiencing homelessness while mitigating impacts on local businesses and residents. • Establish a Civic Engagement Organization: Mobilize local non-profits and civic groups to activate the City’s public spaces, with a focus on organizing community events and recreational programs tailored to youth, fostering greater community identity and promoting healthy lifestyles. • Advance the Development of a Waterfront Hotel: Develop the Dutch Harbor property (910 North Main Street) while enhancing outreach to current waterfront hotel and resort properties to revitalize existing visitor lodging facilities.

These projects promise significant economic growth, improved infrastructure, and enhanced services critical to the City’s long-term success. Though the path ahead may be uncertain, this budget provides the flexibility needed to weather economic uncertainties and continue propelling our community forward.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 3 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.
2023-24 FISCAL YEAR IN REVIEW
As we reflect on the 2023-24 Fiscal Year, our small City has continued to build on the successes of previous years, strategically utilizing our limited resources to achieve significant accomplishments in capital improvement projects and laying the groundwork for future endeavors through comprehensive planning efforts. The City Council and Staff have maintained a keen awareness of trends in risk management and municipal finance, while aggressively pursuing grant opportunities to maximize our resources.

Here are some of the most notable accomplishments:
• Completion of Xabatin “Big Water” Community Park: The City of Lakeport celebrated the grand opening of its new 5-acre waterfront park in October of 2023. The park, funded by a $5.9 million grant from Proposition 68 and additional City funds, features amenities such as a splash pad, skate park, ninja gym and basketball court. It also includes an amphitheater and large green space for community events.

Additionally, the park connects to nearby Library Park through a promenade walking path along the shoreline of Clear Lake.
• Police Department Fully Staffed: Amid the nationwide challenges in recruiting and retaining law enforcement officers, the Lakeport Police Department has achieved full staffing. To ensure the retention of its dedicated officer corps, the Department continues to implement the 2022/23 Police Department Organizational Enhancement Strategy, focusing on enhancing internal communications, mentoring officers in new leadership positions, and team building. • Employee Retention and Attraction: Our small city conducted 13 distinct recruitment processes this past fiscal year, including interviews and testing, resulting in the hiring and onboarding of 15 employees, among them 4 new police officers. To strengthen retention and continue providing the high quality of service our community deserves, the City has embarked on the development of a Recruitment and Marketing Retention Plan to foster a culture making the City of Lakeport an employer of choice. • Homelessness and Mental Health Outreach: In collaboration with the Lake County Behavioral Health Services Department, the City organized a town hall event, drawing over 300 community members to address the nationwide crises within the Lakeport community. In response to community feedback, the City established a designated foot patrol officer position for the downtown business district and parklands.

Two additional town hall events were held to educate the public on available community services and the impacts of the opioid crisis. The City continues to maintain monthly coordination meeting with various community partners to identify and implement additional strategies to assist unhoused individuals and those facing mental health crises, while mitigating negative impacts on residents and local businesses. • Law Enforcement Special Program Operations: The City has demonstrated its commitment to maintaining and expanding special police services offerings through various initiatives. These include partnering with the Lake County Behavioral Health Services Department to integrate a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with the Police Department, implementing a new Detective Trainee position, and ensuring the continuation of the K-9 program with the training of a new handler. Additionally, the City has sustained vital services such as the School Resource Officer program, secured funding for Crisis Response partnerships, and enhanced regional collaboration through participation in specialized training programs.

A new Central Business District & Parks Liaison Officer has also begun operating as of May 2024, furthering the City’s efforts to address community needs effectively.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 4 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.
• Roadway Improvement Projects: The City of Lakeport remains committed to prioritizing pavement enhancement initiatives by strategically focusing on primary corridors, maximizing cost-effectiveness by maintaining good roads, and systematically improving local neighborhoods through its annual chip seal plan. Recent achievements include the successful completion of the Green, Sayre, Loch Streets pavement rehabilitation project, as well as chip seal projects on North Main Street (Clear Lake Avenue to terminus) and Sixteenth Street (North High to North Main). Engineering and design have been finalized for the South Main Pavement and Rehabilitation project, stretching from Lakeport Boulevard to First Street, with completion scheduled for Fall 2024 and incorporating sidewalk and pedestrian enhancements. • 2024 Water and Sewer Main Replacement Project: Progress is well underway for the City’s 2024 Water and Sewer Main Replacement Project, with nearly $8 million allocated for the endeavor. Design work has been completed, and the bid package was solicited in March 2024, setting the stage for the contract to be awarded in June of 2024. Construction is slated to commence in the Summer of 2024, targeting key areas such as Lakeshore Boulevard, Martin Street, and Lakeport Bouvard, with overall completion anticipated by the Summer of 2025.
• Open Gov Implementation: The City has successfully implemented a new software system facilitating online permitting and licensing processes for various departments including land use, building permits, code enforcement, and business licenses. This modern system enables convenient online project submissions and electronic payments, streamlining processes and enhancing efficiency. Additionally, features such as a “Report a Concern” component for Code Enforcement and automated procurement and contracting further improve service delivery and transparency for both residents and businesses. • Vacant Buildings and Shopping Center Revitalization: This past year has seen significant progress made in the revitalization of vacant buildings and shopping centers throughout town. Notable accomplishments include the revitalization of the former KMART building, which now hosts Tractor Supply (opened May 2024) and Marshall’s (opening Summer/Fall 2024), and efforts to resolve violations and reactivate the Vista Point Shopping Center through collaboration with a new ownership group. The High Street Village Shopping Center has seen all vacancies filled due to aggressive tenant recruitment and building improvements by a new ownership group, while the downtown area benefits from the transformation of a long-time vacant building into a vibrant wine tasting room and restaurant at On The Waterfront.

In addition to the listed accomplishments above, please see the ‘Operating Budgets’ section of this report to review the many accomplishments listed by individual Departments for fiscal year 2023/24.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 5 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

BUDGET YEAR 2024/25 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
I am happy to submit, once more, to the City Council and citizens of the City of Lakeport, a budget that is structurally balanced. General Fund revenues, collectively, are experiencing a time of sluggish growth. While some streams are expected to see moderate growth, sales tax revenues, the City's main source of income, have declined for seven quarters in a row after the post pandemic "recovery." The future projection of sales tax is not great, but rather anticipated to see slight growth in the 1% range going forward. This lack of general fund revenue growth comes after a severe inflationary period that is keeping the prices of goods and services high. High inflation has a kind of double effect on the City of Lakeport. Our local economy is largely composed of low to moderate income people. High prices significantly affect their ability to buy taxable goods as they could when prices were lower.

This reduced spending negatively affects general fund revenues, which in turn means fewer available resources to pay for the higher prices of goods and services needed to sustain City services. The table below shows the trend of general fund sources, after the passage of Measure Z revenue, available for operating expenses and those that are one time:

The table above shows another key aspect of the City’s revenue structure — how much it relies on tax revenues versus other revenue sources. Almost 85% of the City’s revenue is from property and sales taxes. Sales tax by itself is 60%.

The chart below shows the forecasted trend of general fund revenues and rising costs over time, and suggests a possibility that costs will exceed revenues in the near future. The City knows that forecasts can change for different reasons, but it is preparing for probable scenarios and how they could affect City services.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 6 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

A healthy reserve is the best way to protect against such shocks. This year’s budget keeps a high General Fund reserve of about 90% of the total budgeted spending. This past year the City Council improved its reserve by adopting a more formal reserve policy. This policy created specific reserve categories with minimum suggested funding levels for: operations, economic uncertainty, disaster contingency, unfunded pension liabilities, vehicle and equipment replacement and road improvements reserve funds. Even though the General Fund faces a grim long-term outlook, the General Fund still has a strong fund balance of reserve supported by solid policy designed to handle economic shocks that may and likely will happen.

Measure Z, a one-cent sales tax measure, was implemented in 2017 and has been vital for the City’s capacity to sustain services and finance capital improvement projects. Improvements to law enforcement services, roadways and parks were key factors for Lakeport residents' backing of Measure Z.

The City’s enterprise funds have been more stable thanks to the adopted rate increases that enabled the funding of necessary water system improvement projects, especially the replacement of old water mains throughout the city. The City Council authorized the issuance of $5.9 million in bonds to address the City’s water enterprise 10- year capital improvement needs. Projects include the replacement of almost two (2) miles of water lines, groundwater well improvements and water treatment upgrades. This proactive approach lets the City keep the important position of continuing to choose improvement projects rather than letting water system failures choose themselves for us at a much higher cost. The sewer enterprise fund remains in a good financial position. Identified 5-year capital improvement projects will be cash funded from existing reserves and revenues. Projects include the enlargement of the sewer line between the Lakeshore and Rose lift stations, sewer main replacement along Lakeport Boulevard and Martin Street and slip lining of laterals throughout the City to better control Infiltration and Inflow (I&I) which will reduce the expensive treatment of stormwater at the wastewater treatment plant. The main replacement project is planned to start early in the 2024/25 fiscal year and includes significant funding to upgrade the sections of roadway above the new underground utilities.

FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 PROJECTS & GOALS
As highlighted in the introduction, increased costs are outpacing revenues, which have remained stagnant for the past few years and are only projected to increase at a minimal rate over the next couple of years. This has limited the City’s ability to include new projects in the current fiscal year budget. Our primary focus for this year, similar to last year, will be on completing previously budgeted capital improvement projects and the aggressive pursuit of available grant funding opportunities to address unfunded needs. Despite the constraints, our commitment to strategic planning remains crucial in ensuring the efficient allocation of limited resources to address capital improvement needs.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 7 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

The City Council has developed seven (7) key priority areas to further focus monetary and staff resources. These priority areas are outlined more comprehensively on page 14 of this document and are listed here:
• Public Safety and Crisis Response
• Disaster Resiliency
• Good Governance and Fiscal Stability
• Capital Infrastructure Improvement
• Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods
• Economic Development
My job as City Manager is to implement programs, activities, and directives to further progress in these established City Council priority areas. Department heads have tailored their individual goals for this budget year with these priorities in mind and structured their budgets accordingly. Many of the proposed projects scheduled for this year build upon endeavors already begun; all of them aim to address at least one (1), if not several of the City Council priority areas outlined above. A short analysis follows showing how proposed departmental goal’s aim to further each of the stated priority areas.

Public Safety and Crisis Response. The City Council's approved objectives for Public Safety and Crisis Response prioritize the attraction, retention, and training of high-quality law enforcement personnel, addressing homelessness, mental health, and substance abuse, and promoting community policing strategies. The goals for fiscal year 24/25 are aligned with these objectives and are designed to further enhance the city’s capability to provide effective and compassionate public safety services. Some of the key goals related to public safety and crisis response include the following:

Innovative Staffing Measures and Technological Enhancements Maintaining appropriate staffing levels is critical in the current challenging environment for law enforcement recruitment and retention. To address this, the city will explore innovative measures to attract and retain highquality law enforcement personnel. By partnering with a marketing firm, the city aims to enhance recruitment outreach, emphasizing the benefits of living and working in Lakeport. This strategic marketing effort is expected to reach a broader and more diverse pool of potential recruits.

In addition to improving recruitment, the city will implement advanced technology to enhance police operations.

Modern technology can streamline workflows, improve communication, and increase efficiency in law enforcement activities. Continuous succession planning and training throughout the department will ensure that there is always a pipeline of qualified personnel ready to step into critical roles. This approach not only prepares the department for future challenges but also boosts officer morale by providing clear career progression and professional development opportunities.

Leadership Transition and Professional Development
A key goal for the upcoming year is to support the transition of a new Police Chief. This transition is vital to maintaining a sustained commitment to community policing initiatives. The new leadership will play a crucial role in fostering a supportive environment that boosts morale and promotes the professional development of the young police force.

By ensuring effective and community-oriented law enforcement services, the new Police Chief will help solidify the department’s role as a trusted and integral part of the community. Leadership that prioritizes community engagement and officer well-being is essential for the long-term success of the department’s initiatives.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 8 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Addressing Increased Service Requests and Crisis Interventions With the rise in service requests related to changing state mandates and the growth in crisis-related interventions, it is crucial to identify and implement best practices. The focus will be on homeless outreach, substance use disorder, and mental health crisis intervention. These areas are the most significant sources of service calls and require a coordinated and compassionate response.

The City will continue to strengthen partnerships with local organizations such as the Lake Family Resource Center, Redwood Community Services and the Lake County Behavioral Health Services Department. These partnerships will facilitate a more integrated approach to crisis response, ensuring that individuals in need receive appropriate care and support. By leveraging these collaborations, the city can enhance its ability to address the root causes of homelessness, substance abuse, and mental health issues, ultimately reducing the burden on law enforcement and improving community outcomes.

Navigation Center Feasibility Study
Addressing homelessness requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach. This fiscal year, the City will complete the Navigation Center Feasibility Study, which aims to identify viable sites, operational requirements, and funding avenues for establishing a low-barrier navigation center. Such a center would provide essential services to individuals experiencing homelessness, helping to mitigate the impacts on local businesses and residents.

The intention of the navigation center will be to serve as a one-stop help center, offering housing, basic services, and support for mental health and substance abuse issues. By providing these services in a centralized location, the city can more effectively assist those in need while reducing the strain on law enforcement and other community resources.

Disaster Resiliency. The City Council's approved objectives for Disaster Resiliency focus on mitigating hazard vulnerabilities, enhancing preparedness, managing adverse conditions during emergencies, and restoring areas post-disaster. The fiscal year 24/25 activities and cooperation with regional entities such as the County of Lake and City of Clearlake significantly advance these objectives. By collaborating with regional entities and leveraging shared resources, the community is better equipped to manage and mitigate the impacts of hazards, fostering a safer and more resilient environment for all residents.

County Disaster Mitigation Plan
The development of a comprehensive Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) is essential for systematic risk reduction. This project, adhering to current FEMA guidelines, involves the Lake County Office of Emergency Services (LCOES) authoring the Base Plan while a contractor creates specific annexes which will be an update to the existing plans for each participating city. This collaborative approach ensures that local needs are addressed and strategies are effectively tailored.

Engaging a wide array of stakeholders, including county departments, the City of Lakeport, the City of Clearlake, additional agencies, and the general public, ensures that the plan is comprehensive and inclusive. Public participation is crucial as it helps inform strategies and actions based on local experiences and concerns. This engagement aligns with the Council's objective of pursuing preventive measures to reduce hazard vulnerabilities by incorporating community feedback into mitigation strategies.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 9 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Risk Reduction Authority Participation
Participation in the Risk Reduction Authority (RRA) enhances the community's ability to manage hazards effectively. The RRA supports local governments in implementing low or no-cost risk reduction programs, developing funding to sustain these programs, and providing educational resources to the public. These initiatives empower residents to better assess and manage risks, thereby enhancing overall preparedness.

The RRA's role in securing and managing funding is critical for the long-term sustainability of disaster preparedness and mitigation efforts. By offering educational resources and risk reduction programs, the RRA helps build community resilience, ensuring that residents are better equipped to handle emergencies. This directly supports the Council's goal of building capabilities to manage the impacts of hazards.

Good Governance and Fiscal Stability. The City Council's approved objectives for Good Governance and Fiscal Responsibility emphasize fostering fiscal discipline, enhancing services through technology, ensuring quality service delivery, providing timely information, increasing citizen engagement, managing risks, and promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. The fiscal year 24/25 goals further these objectives through several key initiatives:

Labor Negotiations and Job Description Updates
Labor negotiations are crucial for maintaining fiscal discipline and ensuring efficient service delivery. By successfully negotiating with management and the Lakeport Employees’ Association (LEA) and starting negotiations with the Lakeport Police Officers Association (LPOA), the City aims to align employee compensation with budgetary constraints while maintaining high service standards. These negotiations help manage long-term financial obligations, contributing to fiscal stewardship.

Updating employee job descriptions ensures that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and aligned with current legal standards and organizational needs. This process helps mitigate risks associated with employment law and enhances service delivery by ensuring that employees understand their duties and expectations. It also aids in performance management and succession planning, fostering a more efficient and responsive workforce.

Recruitment, Retention, and Marketing
Effective recruitment and retention strategies are essential for maintaining a skilled and motivated workforce. By employing marketing strategies developed by an outside firm, the City can attract top talent and reduce turnover rates. This aligns with the goals of fiscal discipline and quality service delivery by ensuring that the City has the necessary human resources to meet its operational needs efficiently.

Cost of Service Study
A comprehensive review and cost of service study will provide insights into the actual costs of providing various services, ensuring that fees are fair, transparent, and aligned with the costs incurred. This process supports fiscal stewardship by enabling the City to set fees that cover service costs without overburdening residents, thereby ensuring sustainable financial management.

Franchise Agreement Update
Modernizing the franchise solid waste agreement ensures that waste management services remain cost-effective and reliable. Such improvements are in line with the City's objectives of providing quality services and managing risks associated with waste management.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 10 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Succession Planning and Training
Succession planning and continuous training are vital for maintaining a competent and prepared workforce. These initiatives ensure that the City can fill critical positions with qualified individuals, thus maintaining continuity in service delivery. Training programs enhance employees' skills, contributing to higher productivity and better service outcomes. These efforts support the City’s objectives of fostering fiscal discipline, quality service delivery, and risk management by preparing the workforce to handle current and future challenges.

These initiatives not only ensure efficient service delivery and fiscal discipline but also promote transparency, community involvement, and diversity, making Lakeport a resilient and forward-thinking city.

Capital Infrastructure Improvement. The City Council’s objectives for capital infrastructure improvement focus on properly prioritizing capital improvements, aggressively pursuing various sources of funding, and continuing to develop project readiness. The fiscal year 24/25 goals align with these objectives through several key projects that enhance infrastructure reliability, service delivery, and overall community resilience.

Water and Sewer Main Line Replacement Project
The 2024 Water and Sewer main line replacement project, with a budget of $8 million, aims to replace approximately two miles of water main and one mile of sewer main across the city. This project is essential for improving infrastructure reliability and service delivery to residents. The replacement of outdated water and sewer mains reduces the risk of service interruptions, leaks, and environmental hazards. By prioritizing this capital improvement, the city demonstrates its commitment to maintaining essential services and enhancing the quality of life for its residents. Moreover, the substantial investment highlights the City’s proactive approach to securing necessary funding, ensuring fiscal responsibility and long-term infrastructure sustainability.

Pavement Management Program
The City’s Pavement Management Program for 2024/25 includes several significant roadway capital improvement projects:

1. Renovation of South Main Street (from Lakeport Boulevard to First Street):This project addresses sidewalk gaps, improves pedestrian crossings, and enhances roadway surfacing. By focusing on these enhancements, the city ensures safer and more accessible pedestrian pathways, promoting inclusivity and community well-being.

2. Microsurfacing Projects: Drafting design specifications and bid documents for microsurfacing North High Street (from Clear Lake Avenue to Lakeshore Boulevard), Charlie Jolin Way, and Parallel Drive (from City Limits to Lakeport Boulevard). These projects extend the life of collector roads cost-effectively, demonstrating strategic use of resources and preventing costly full road reconstructions.

3. Del Lago Local Neighborhood Chip Seal Project: This project aims to maintain neighborhood roads, reflecting the city's commitment to addressing local infrastructure needs and ensuring quality service delivery.

By executing these projects, the city not only improves road safety and functionality but also showcases its ability to prioritize capital improvements effectively. These efforts align with the city’s goal of developing project readiness and securing funding for critical infrastructure projects.

Scotts Creek Well Replacement
The completion of engineering and design for a new Scotts Creek well is another crucial goal. This project aims to replace existing wells, ensuring a reliable, year-round, water supply for the City. By prioritizing this capital improvement, the City enhances its preparedness for potential water shortages or failures, supporting long-term sustainability. This proactive approach to infrastructure development demonstrates the City’s commitment to maintaining essential services and ensuring the well-being of its residents.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 11 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Water and Sewer Master Plans Update
Updating the Water and Sewer Master Plans and completing an updated recycled water feasibility study are essential steps in the City’s infrastructure strategy. These updated plans will guide future capital improvements, ensuring that investments are strategically targeted to address the most critical needs. The feasibility study for recycled water aligns with environmental sustainability goals, exploring innovative solutions for water reuse and reducing overall water consumption. These efforts demonstrate the City’s commitment to fiscal stewardship, resource efficiency, and long-term planning.

Safe, Sustainable and Attractive Neighborhoods. The City Council’s policy priority area of Safe, Sustainable and Attractive Neighborhoods emphasizes the importance of diverse housing options, quality housing stock, accessible parks, community health, vibrant community events, open space preservation, and environmental protection. The fiscal year 24/25 goals align well with these objectives, driving forward various initiatives aimed at enhancing the overall quality of life for the residents of Lakeport.

Navigation Center Feasibility Study
Completing the Navigation Center Feasibility Study is a critical step towards addressing homelessness in Lakeport.

This study will identify potential sites, operational requirements, and funding strategies for establishing a lowbarrier navigation center. Such a center would provide essential services to individuals experiencing homelessness, including temporary housing, healthcare, and job placement assistance. By facilitating improved access to these community services, the City can better support its homeless population while also reducing the negative impacts on local businesses and residents. This initiative directly improves community health metrics and promotes social stability, making neighborhoods safer and more attractive.

Civic Engagement Organization
The exploration of establishing a civic engagement organization aims to mobilize local nonprofits and civic groups to utilize public spaces effectively. By organizing community events and recreational programs, particularly for the youth, this initiative fosters a stronger community identity and promotes healthier lifestyles. Engaging residents in civic activities enhances the sense of belonging and participation in the community, contributing to the overall quality of life. Such initiatives can also highlight the economic value of environmental protection by using public spaces for events that raise awareness about sustainability, conservation, history, culture and arts.

Housing Services Program Strategic Plan
Implementing a strategic plan for the City's Housing Services Program is pivotal to providing a wide variety of housing options and improving the quality of existing housing stock. This program will address housing affordability, support first-time homebuyers, and facilitate owner-occupied rehabilitation projects. By strategically planning and implementing housing services, the city can ensure that residents have access to safe, affordable, and quality housing. This aligns with the council's objectives of promoting diverse housing options and improving the overall housing quality within the city.

Proactive Code Enforcement Program
Evaluating options for an enhanced, proactive Code Enforcement Program, including the potential adoption of a Nuisance Abatement Ordinance, is another key goal. This initiative will help maintain the aesthetics and safety of neighborhoods by ensuring compliance with local codes and ordinances. Proactive code enforcement can address issues such as property neglect, illegal dumping, and other nuisances that detract from neighborhood attractiveness. This effort not only enhances the visual appeal of neighborhoods but also contributes to overall public health and safety, creating more livable and welcoming communities.

Economic Development. The City Council’s policy priority area of Economic Development focuses on promoting regional economic initiatives, supporting business retention and attraction, and enhancing the historic downtown and lakefront area. The fiscal year 24/25 goals are designed to further these objectives, fostering a thriving local economy and vibrant community.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 12 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

Update of the Lakeport Economic Development Strategic Plan Updating the Lakeport Economic Development Strategic Plan is essential for aligning the city's economic strategies with current trends and community needs. This comprehensive plan will guide future initiatives, ensuring that efforts are effectively targeted to promote growth, attract businesses, and support local entrepreneurs. The updated plan will include new data, insights, and strategies to enhance the city's economic resilience and competitiveness.

Development of a Waterfront Hotel
Advancing the development of a waterfront hotel on the Dutch Harbor property (910 North Main Street) is a significant step toward revitalizing Lakeport’s tourism sector. A waterfront hotel can serve as a major attraction, drawing visitors to the area and boosting local businesses. Enhancing outreach to existing waterfront hotel and resort properties will help in revitalizing these facilities, ensuring they meet modern standards and continue to attract visitors. This goal aligns with the objective of enhancing the historic downtown and lakefront area, making it a more appealing destination.

Initiatives to Increase Visitors to Downtown and the Waterfront Implementing initiatives to increase pedestrian traffic in downtown and waterfront districts is crucial for economic vitality. By enhancing placemaking strategies and destination marketing, the City can create a more attractive and economically vibrant environment. Projects such as improving wayfinding signage, refining downtown design guidelines, and conducting general marketing efforts will make it easier for residents and visitors to navigate and enjoy these areas. Increased pedestrian traffic supports local businesses and contributes to a lively community atmosphere.

Collaboration with the Clear Lake Environmental Research Center (CLERC) Collaborating with the Clear Lake Environmental Research Center (CLERC) to establish a publicly-accessible environmental resource center in the renovated upstairs of the historic Lakeport Carnegie Library building is a key initiative. This center will serve as an educational and research hub, attracting visitors and scholars interested in environmental studies. It will also provide an opportunity to showcase Lakeport’s commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship, potentially drawing eco-tourism and enhancing the City’s reputation as a forward-thinking and engaged community.

Vacant Commercial Buildings and Registration Program
Revising the inventory of vacant commercial buildings and proposing a vacant building registration program for City Council review aims to enhance oversight and management of vacant properties. This initiative will promote responsible property management and facilitate efforts to revitalize these commercial spaces. By keeping an updated inventory and implementing a registration program, the city can better monitor and address issues related to vacant buildings, ensuring they do not detract from the community’s economic and aesthetic appeal.

CAPITAL PROJECTS & STUDIES
Several of the large scheduled projects for this upcoming year have been discussed in the previous section but many others are also budgeted this year. A comprehensive listing of background projects is listed here:

Capital Projects:
• South Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Lakeport Boulevard to First Street) • Del Lago Neighborhood Chip Seal Project
• Miscellaneous Sidewalk Gap and ADA Ramp Improvements (in conjunction with other scheduled projects) • Westside Community Park Sport Fields Top Dress and Overseed • Silveira Community Center HVAC and Electrical Upgrade Project Completion • Mobile Radar Trailer Procurement
• Police Camera Body Cameras
• Forbes Creek Headwall Repair
• Hartley Storm Drain Replacement
Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 13 Agenda Item # VII.E.1. • Green Ranch Well Rehabilitation
• Activated Carbon Replacement Project at Surface Water Plant • Scotts Creek Well Access Improvements
• Water Main Replacement—Lakeport Boulevard (Bevins Street to Main Street) 2,560’ • Water Main Replacement—Armstrong Street (Berry Street to Smith Street) 983’ • Water and Sewer Main Replacement—Lakeshore Boulevard (Ashe Street to Beach Lane) 2,866 • Water and Sewer Main Replacement—Martin Street (Bevins Street to Main Street) 2,600’ • Water Main Replacement—Tenth Street and Tunis Street intersection area 640’ • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Upgrade/Programming for Utilities Infrastructure Citywide
• Emergency Generator Installations (Scotts Creek Wells, K Street Lake Intake Facility, Surface Water Treatment Plant)
• K Street Lake Intake Facility Perimeter Fencing Replacement • Replace/Upsize Water Main—Martin (Bevins Street to Martin Street Lift Station) • K Street Water Main Project
In addition to capital improvement projects, the 2024/25 fiscal year budget includes investment in several project studies and other endeavors that are critical to the achievement of the City’s goals and broader quality of life improvement objectives. Many represent the starting point for future capital projects. Some of these projects are noted here:

General Projects, Studies and Engineering:
• Scotts Creek Well Replacement Design and Engineering
• Micro Surfacing Pavement Rehabilitation Project Design and Engineering: High Street (Main Street to Geiselman Street), Charlie Jolin Way, Parallel Drive (Highway 175 to Lakeport Boulevard) • Pavement Rehabilitation Engineering: Del Lago Neighborhood, Lakeport Boulevard/Parallel Drive Roundabout
• Safe Routes to School Project Study Report for Lakeshore Boulevard Sidewalk Project • Water Master Plan Update
• Sewer Master Plan Update
• Comprehensive Fee Study
• Housing Program Services Strategic Plan
• Navigation Center Feasibility Study
• General Plan Update
• Sidewalk Inventory Study
• Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Study
• ADA Transition Plan Update
• Ordinance Updates: establish a vacant building registry, sidewalk vending, business license modernization, streamline short-term rental process, modify nuisance abatement procedures, and cannabis regulation updates.

LOOKING AHEAD
The budget detailed in the following pages sets forth a fiscal plan for services and capital improvement projects that align with the City Council's policies and objectives. Department heads have crafted their budgets to meet these objectives, emphasizing public safety and enhancing the City's roadway, water, and wastewater infrastructure. Our Staff will continue to responsibly manage residents' tax dollars and user fees while actively seeking grant funding and other opportunities to improve the quality of life in Lakeport. This budget has been designed with these priorities in mind, ensuring that resources are used to provide the maximum benefit to the community.

Meeting Date: 06/18/2024 Page 14 Agenda Item # VII.E.1.

However, financial resources are not the only critical factor in our City's success, especially during uncertain times.

Lakeport's true strength lies in its service-oriented operations and the dedication of its talented Staff. I want to personally thank all City employees for their unwavering commitment and innovative approaches during these challenging years.

In conclusion, I extend my deepest gratitude to the residents of Lakeport, our dynamic business community, and our supportive community partners. Your patience, resilience, and cooperative spirit have been vital in overcoming challenges and fostering progress. Together, we have navigated difficult times, developed creative solutions, and welcomed change. Your steadfast support and dedication to our shared vision have established a strong foundation for a promising future. As we look ahead, let us continue to build on our successes and strive for a thriving community for all. I want to thank the City Council for your confidence in our professional Staff, your vision, and your unwavering belief in our collective potential as a City.

OPTIONS:

1. Approve the operating and capital expenditure budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year and adopt the associated resolution.

2. Provide alternative direction.

FISCAL IMPACT:
☐ None ☒ $30,928,238 Budgeted Item? ☐Yes ☐ No
Budget Adjustment Needed? ☐Yes ☐ No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): ☒ General Fund ☒ Water OM Fund ☒ Sewer OM Fund ☒ Other: All Comments:

COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☒ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☒ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☒ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☒ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☒ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to approve the operating and capital expenditure budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year and adopt the associated resolution.
☒ Attachments: 1. Adopting Budget Resolution

2. 2024-25 Recommended Budget
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2024)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF LAKEPORT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LAKEPORT

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND THE BOARD OF THE CITY

OF LAKEPORT MUNICIPAL SEWER DISTRICT
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lakeport, the Successor Agency to the Lakeport Redevelopment Agency, and Board of the City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District has reviewed the Annual Budget for the Fiscal Year 2024-25; and WHEREAS, included in said budget are the necessary estimates of anticipated revenues and assessed valuations for the properties subject to taxation by the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lakeport hereby adopts the budget for the City of Lakeport, the Successor Agency to the Lakeport Redevelopment Agency, and City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District, including the recommended personnel schedules found therein, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024, and ending June 30, 2025; and

THIS RESOLUTION was passed by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular meeting thereof on the 18th day of June, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINING:

ABSENT:
_________________________________
MICHEAL FROIO, Mayor

ATTEST:
_______________________________
KELLY BUENDIA, City Clerk
Lakeport, California

CITY OF LAKEPORT
Annual Budget (RECOMMENDED)
Fiscal Year 2024-25

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

Michael Froio
Mayor and Boards Chair
Kim Costa
Mayor Pro Tem
Boards Vice Chair
Kenny Parlet
Council Member
Stacey Mattina
Council Member
Brandon Disney
Council Member
City Council
Redevelopment Successor Agency Board of
Directors
Sewer District Board of Directors
Municipal Financing Authority of Lakeport Board
of Directors

GOVERNING BODY ADVISORY COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS
Lakeport Planning Commission
Lakeport Economic Development Advisory Committee
(LEDAC)
Measure Z Advisory Committee
Kevin Ingram
City Manager
David Ruderman
City Attorney
Brad Rasumssen
Chief of Police
Nicholas Walker
Assistant City Manager/ Finance & IT Director
Ron Ladd
Public Works Director
Paul Harris
Utilities Director
Joey Hejnowicz
Community Development Director
Kelly Buendia
Administrative Services Director/City Clerk

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

1. TABLE OF CONTENTS
City Organizational Chart ....................................................................................................................................... i Mission and Vision ................................................................................................................................................ ii City Manager’s Budget Message .......................................................................................................................... 1 Lakeport City Council Priority Areas ................................................................................................................... 14 Community Profile ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Budget in Brief ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 City-Wide Compared ................................................................................................................................... 19 General Fund Compared ............................................................................................................................ 20 Historical Revenue Summary ...................................................................................................................... 21 Historical Expenditure Summary ................................................................................................................. 22 Expenditures by Department ....................................................................................................................... 23 Department Expenditure Detail ................................................................................................................... 24 Sources and Uses for Fiscal Year 2024-25 ................................................................................................ 25 Sources ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Uses ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 Property Tax Distribution ............................................................................................................................. 28 Sales Tax Distribution ................................................................................................................................. 29 Measure I .................................................................................................................................................... 30 Measure Z ................................................................................................................................................... 31 Other Major Revenues ................................................................................................................................ 32 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ................................................................................................................... 33 Capital Expenditures ................................................................................................................................... 34 Charts and Graphs .............................................................................................................................................. 38 Trends and Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Long-Term Financial Plan ................................................................................................................................... 43 Jurisdiction Comparison ...................................................................................................................................... 46 Fund Summaries ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Governmental Funds ....................................................................................................................................... 49 General Fund .............................................................................................................................................. 52 Capital Projects ........................................................................................................................................... 53 2017 Storm Capital Projects ....................................................................................................................... 54 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 54 Debt Service ................................................................................................................................................ 55 Parkland Dedication Fund ........................................................................................................................... 56 Highway User Tax (HUTA) .......................................................................................................................... 57 Prop 172 Public Safety ................................................................................................................................ 58 Lakeport Housing Program ......................................................................................................................... 59 PLHA NAVIGATION CENTER FUND ......................................................................................................... 60 Police K-9 Fund ........................................................................................................................................... 61 APC 10th St Bike and Pedestrian ............................................................................................................... 62 Department of Boating and Waterways Bathroom Grant............................................................................ 63 ATP Sidewalk Planning Grant ..................................................................................................................... 64 2018 CDBG DR Grant Fund ....................................................................................................................... 65 2021 CDBG Grant Fund .............................................................................................................................. 66 2020 CDBG CV Grant Fund ........................................................................................................................ 67 2018 CDBG Grant Fund .............................................................................................................................. 68 2017 CDBG Grant Fund .............................................................................................................................. 69 2022CDBG Grant Fund ............................................................................................................................... 70 HOME Grant PI ........................................................................................................................................... 71 CDBG PI ...................................................................................................................................................... 72 Tenth Street Drainage ................................................................................................................................. 73 Lakeport Blvd Improvement ........................................................................................................................ 74 South Main Improvement ............................................................................................................................ 75 Parkside Traffic Mitigation ........................................................................................................................... 76 Parallel/Bevins Storm water Maintenance .................................................................................................. 77 ER Storm Damage Repair .......................................................................................................................... 78 Safe Routes To Schools ............................................................................................................................. 79 Lakeside Park Fund .................................................................................................................................... 80 Storm Drainage ........................................................................................................................................... 81 City Wide HSIP ............................................................................................................................................ 82 Proprietary ....................................................................................................................................................... 83 Water O&M .................................................................................................................................................. 84 Water Expansion ......................................................................................................................................... 85 Sewer O&M ................................................................................................................................................. 86 Sewer Expansion ........................................................................................................................................ 87 2017-1 CLMSD Sewer Assessment District ............................................................................................... 88 Internal Service Fund – Risk Management and Insurance ......................................................................... 89 Fiduciary .......................................................................................................................................................... 90 OPEB Agency Fund .................................................................................................................................... 91 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund .............................................................................................. 92 Operating Budgets .............................................................................................................................................. 93 Non-Departmental ........................................................................................................................................... 94 Legislative ....................................................................................................................................................... 95 Administration .................................................................................................................................................. 98 City Manager ............................................................................................................................................... 98 City Clerk ................................................................................................................................................... 100 Administrative Services – Human Resources ........................................................................................... 101 Economic Development ............................................................................................................................ 106 City Attorney .................................................................................................................................................. 109 Finance & it ................................................................................................................................................... 110 Community Development .............................................................................................................................. 114 Planning .................................................................................................................................................... 117 Building ...................................................................................................................................................... 119 Housing ..................................................................................................................................................... 121 Police ............................................................................................................................................................. 123 Public Works ................................................................................................................................................. 127 Administration and Compliance ................................................................................................................ 130 Engineering ............................................................................................................................................... 131 Roads and Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 132 Parks, Buildings and Grounds ................................................................................................................... 133 Utilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 135 Water Operations and Maintenance ......................................................................................................... 137 Sewer Operations & Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 138 Attachments ...................................................................................................................................................... 140 Budget Resolution ......................................................................................................................................... 141 Gann Limit Resolution ................................................................................................................................... 142 Gann Limit Calculation .................................................................................................................................. 143 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................................ 144 Transfers Schedule ....................................................................................................................................... 145 Debt Schedules ............................................................................................................................................. 146 Personnel Schedules .................................................................................................................................... 148 Position Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 148 Salary Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 149 City Benefit Plans ...................................................................................................................................... 150 Glossary of Terms ......................................................................................................................................... 152 Accounting Structure ..................................................................................................................................... 157 Financial/Budget Policies .............................................................................................................................. 158 Financial Management Policies .................................................................................................................... 160 Budget Schedule ........................................................................................................................................... 164 Page | i

Lakeport City CouncilJune 18, 2024

Lakeport City Council
June 18, 2024