Lancaster City Council
October 13, 2026

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY
2525 Corporate Place, Suite 100
Monterey Park, California 91754
Telephone: (323) 881-8291
http://www.la-rics.org
SCOTT EDSON SENT CORRESPONDENCE BY:

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR E-MAIL
June 27, 2024
Dear City Manager / Member Agency:

On June 6, 2024, the Board of Directors for the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority ("Board"), adopted the enclosed Revised Funding Plan, which replaces the current formula for the funding of the LA-RICS Land Mobile Radio System’s ("LMR System") operations and maintenance with a grant and subscriber revenue offset model. Only subscribers who desire to utilize the LMR System for their primary radio communications will pay the current rate of $20 per subscriber device, while affiliates who desire to utilize the LMR System only for mutual or automatic aid will not be charged.

The adopted Revised Funding Plan is being shared with you in accordance with the notice requirements of Section 7.01 (Notices) of the Joint Powers Agreement. The adopted Revised Funding Plan, along with the Board letter that accompanied it for the Board's consideration, can be accessed through the LA-RICS website: www.LA-RICS.org / Documents / Document Library.

If you have any questions, you may contact me, Scott Edson, at (323) 881-8281.

Sincerely,

SCOTT EDSON

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Enclosure
SE:mbc
LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

LA-RICS

REVISED FUNDING PLAN
June 6, 2024

LA-RICS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan
Page i
Table of Contents
Table of Contents................................................................................................................................ i List of Tables........................................................................................................................................ i Appendices.......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary............................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 3 Section 1. Revised Funding Plan Overview........................................................................................ 5 Section 2. Cost Allocation Method .................................................................................................... 6 Section 3. Data Monitoring and True Up Period ............................................................................. 11 List of Tables
Table 1. Adopted Funding Plan Cost Components............................................................................ 8 Table 2. Revised Funding Plan Cost Components ............................................................................. 9 Appendices
Appendix 1 LA-RICS Joint Powers Authority Agreement
Appendix 2 Adopted Funding Plan – May 28, 2014
Appendix 3 Minutes of May 28, 2014 LA-RICS Board Meeting Appendix 4 LA-RICS User Agreement: Subscriber
Appendix 5 LA-RICS User Agreement: Affiliate
Appendix 6 AT&T / LA-RICS Asset Transfer and Business Agreement Appendix 7 Motorola Solutions Agreement No. 007, Maintenance Option - Appendix D Appendix 8 Motorola Solutions System Upgrade Agreement DRAFT Appendix 9 Facilities Maintenance Scope of Work
Appendix 10 LA-RICS Authority Administration, Technical and Operations Team LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Executive Summary
The Land Mobile Radio System ("LMR System") of the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System Authority ("Authority") is a modern, integrated wireless voice communication system designed to serve law enforcement, fire service, and health service professionals throughout Los Angeles County. The Authority is a California joint powers authority with 24 Member agencies including the County of Los Angeles, 21 cities, one school district, and the University of California, Los Angeles (each, a "Member").

Per the Joint Powers Agreement ("Agreement"), the Authority was required to develop and adopt a Funding Plan before it committed resources to constructing the LMR System (Ref. Art. V, Sec.

5.01 of Appendix 1). The LA-RICS Board adopted the Funding Plan on May 28, 2014 (hereinafter, "Adopted Funding Plan") (Appendix 2) and permitted an extended 180-day opt-out period for Members as approved by the LA-RICS Board (Appendix 3). The Adopted Funding Plan was intended to apply during deployment of the LMR System, with certain unknown cost factors such as Operations and Maintenance and other system upgrades requiring a revision to the Adopted Funding Plan at a later date.

While the LMR System was built substantially with federal grant and California state funds, the Adopted Funding Plan required Members to provide the revenue source for certain administrative costs not covered by grants as well as the operations and maintenance (O&M) and capital costs with apportionment of costs based on 50% population and 50% geography of each member agency. Further, these costs would change for each Member if another opted out of LA-RICS.

Despite member concern regarding a variable fee and strong preference for a fixed fee that is not tied to the number of Members in LA-RICS, the LA-RICS Board adopted the Funding Plan which then started the Member opt-out period. Given concerns of a variable rate lacking predictability, many agencies opted out of LA-RICS.

To mitigate Member, opt-outs, the County of Los Angeles provided revenue required to sustain 100% of “Member Costs” from 2014 – 2018. This contribution was identified as a loan in each of LA-RICS’ annual Adopted Operating Budgets and audits. The goal was to ensure Member participation through the LMR System deployment while allowing agencies time to fully realize their existent capital investment in their respective communication systems.

The LMR System completed deployment and was accepted on November 17, 2023. With the network having been completed and draft costs for its ongoing O&M identified, a revision to the Adopted Funding Plan is now appropriate.

Draft costs for ongoing operations and maintenance of the LMR System have been obtained and, upon LA-RICS Board approval, execution of corresponding agreements are planned for 2024. With the LMR System accepted, the process of onboarding users began with User Agreements for Subscribers and Affiliates that were finalized and adopted by the LA-RICS Board on December 7, 2023, and January 4, 2024, respectively, (Appendices 4 & 5) establishing a subscription rate for each device on the LMR System network. Per these User Agreements, "Subscribers" are those LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

agencies who desire to utilize the LMR System for their primary radio communications, while "Affiliates" desire to utilize the LMR System only for mutual or automatic aid.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Introduction
The Land Mobile Radio System ("LMR System") of Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System Authority ("Authority") is a modern, integrated wireless voice system designed to serve law enforcement, fire service, and health service professionals throughout Los Angeles County. The Authority is a California joint powers authority with 24 Members including the County of Los Angeles, 21 cities, one school district, and the University of California, Los Angeles.

System Description
Description of the LMR System
The LMR System is an integrated, regional, public safety wireless communications system operating primarily on UHF T-Band and 700 MHz channels. This Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) Project 25 Phase II capable wireless communications system will provide public safety first responders with mission critical voice and data communications supporting day-to-day operable communications, mutual aid, and regional interoperability. It will provide immediate and coordinated assistance in times of emergency, minimizing loss of life and property within the greater Los Angeles Region.

Furthermore, the LMR System will provide enhanced communications through the following Subsystems:
 Digital Trunked Voice Radio Subsystem (DTVRS): This DTVRS subsystem is considered the primary subsystem. It incorporates Project 25 Phase II equipment operating a voice communications network on both UHF “T-Band” and 700 MHz channels. Intra-subsystem communications between users on the two frequency bands is transparent.  Analog Conventional Voice Radio Subsystem (ACVRS): The ACVRS subsystem uses narrowband analog UHF channels and interfaces with the DTVRS subsystem. ACVRS consists of 35 Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) channels that have been deployed regionally to support operational service areas in Los Angeles County. There are an additional six ACVRS channels managed by Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for law enforcement operations.
 Narrowband Mobile Data Network (NMDN): The NMDN Subsystem is available to all member agencies. This subsystem’s data network operates on the UHF channels and provides reliable Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) connectivity.
 Los Angeles Regional Tactical Communications Subsystem (LARTCS): The LARTCS Subsystem supports public safety operations on VHF Low-Band, VHF High-Band, UHF and 800 MHz. This subsystem provides DTVRS and ACVRS users interoperability with legacy public safety systems users that would not normally operate on LA-RICS’ primary subsystems.  Microwave Network: The LA-RICS microwave network provides the necessary connectivity to support all voice and data subsystems and all system alarm monitoring functions. The LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

microwave backhaul is designed with high-speed connectivity in a ring configuration to allow fast rerouting when a link is out of order, thus avoiding operational impact on the LMR subsystems.

Where possible, the LARTCS Subsystem radio system attempts to logically share common infrastructure components.

System Capabilities and Advantages
The LMR System will facilitate and support Authority stakeholders’ day-to-day public safety voice and low-speed data communications needs, providing instantaneous mutual aid in the event of a man-made or natural disaster. As such, the LMR System provides communications surge capability and resiliency. It provides generous allowances for disaster recovery and future system growth.

Funding
The LMR System provides day-to-day communications within agencies and allows seamless interagency communications for responding to routine, emergency, and catastrophic events.

Although a significant portion of the LMR System deployments costs were covered through Federal grant and California state funding, non-grant-funded O&M costs needed to be distributed among its Members and users. The County of Los Angeles provided a loan to cover Member costs from 2014 – 2018, with an Asset Transfer Agreement assigning the LA-RICS Public Safety Broadband Network to FirstNet/AT&T via a federally-approved Agreement with a corresponding Business Agreement providing the revenue required to operate the LA-RICS JPA from 2018 through present day (Appendix 6). The revenue from the AT&T Business Agreement is expected to be fully expended by the end of 2024.

During the development of the initial LA-RICS Funding Plan, there were various methods for cost apportionment considered. The Authority received feedback on the methods via Member outreach efforts and stakeholder workshops. The feedback indicated a strong preference for a fixed rate based on usage vs. other variable cost factors. There was a strong concern voiced by Members that, for every member that chooses not to participate, the withdrawing Member’s annual share of the cost would be apportioned to the remaining Members. This was perceived as a resulting significant risk to Members that choose to remain in the Authority. Consequently, a large number of the Members chose to opt-out of the Authority. To move the effort forward, the County offered bridge financing as a “loan” until User revenues could be collected. Additionally, the successful negotiation of the agreement to transfer of PSBN assets to FirstNet/AT&T allowed revenue generated from the agreement to cover 100% of Member obligations from 2018 – 2024.

With completion of the LMR System, revisions to the Adopted Funding Plan are needed that will address the concerns expressed by Members at the Funding Plan’s original adoption in 2014.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Section 1. Revised Funding Plan Overview
Requirements
The LA-RICS Joint Powers Agreement Section 2.05(b)(2) notes that it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to “develop and implement a funding plan (the ‘Funding Plan’) for the construction and ongoing operation of a shared voice and data system.” Section 5.01 Adoption of Funding Plan, provides additional clarity for this responsibility:

It is a critical goal of the Authority to develop a Funding Plan that identifies funding sources and mechanisms, including a development schedule and phasing plan, which will permit the maximum feasible participation by Members. The Funding Plan shall be descriptive as to the contributions required from Members.

Prior to committing resources for the construction of the System, a proposed Funding Plan as designated in Section 2.05(b)(2) shall be developed.

Adoption of the Funding Plan on May 28, 2014, satisfied this requirement of the JPA. However, now that the LMR system has been implemented and is entering the operations and maintenance phase, the following language applies:

After the Funding Plan has been adopted, and until contracts are awarded to design and/or construct the System, if the Funding Plan is revised in a manner which will substantially increase the financial obligations of the Members, then any Member so affected will have a further right to withdraw within a period designated by the Board, which shall be not less than 45 days after the adoption of the Revised Funding Plan. There will be no costs for any Member that withdraws from the Authority within this time period, except for obligations incurred prior to the adoption of the Revised Funding Plan.

LA-RICS included in its Agreement with Motorola, Solutions, Inc. (Agreement No. LA-RICS 007) an option Term for LMR System Maintenance and Warranty (Appendix 9) for certain O&M work.

Additionally, LA-RICS received delegated authority to enter into sole-source negotiations with Motorola Solutions for a System Upgrade Agreement (SUA) on February 1, 2024, costs that were unknown and excluded in the current Adopted Funding Plan from 2014.

Estimated costs for maintaining the LA-RICS communications sites and facilities has been obtained from the County’s Internal Services Department and the LA-RICS organization, its project team, subject matter experts and support staff have reviewed to adjust and align those services along with the Authority administration, technical and operations costs with the O&M phase of the project. With negotiations on these costs nearing conclusion, we are able to present a draft revised Funding Plan (hereinafter, "Revised Funding Plan") for your review and consideration.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Revised Funding Plan Components and Goals
To date, the Authority has been the recipient of significant grant funding for the deployment of the LMR System. These grant funds covered a substantial portion of the costs associated with construction of the physical infrastructure that makes up the LMR System. Additionally, LA-RICS is scheduled to receive funding commencing with the Urban Areas Security Initiative 2024 grant totaling one million ($1,000,000) annually for certain O&M costs. The Revised Funding Plan is responsible for proposing an allocation of the costs not covered by grant funding, including LMR Operations &Maintenance (O&M), an SUA for the LMR System, LMR lifecycle capital replacement, facilities maintenance, and the Authority's Administration (Section 2 provides more detail about Revised Funding Plan costs).

The methodology for the distribution of ongoing costs among Member agencies and Users is aligned with prior received feedback to have one fixed, competitive cost for each radio on the LMR System. Revision of the Adopted Funding Plan to a subscriber-based model will allow for alignment with costs for agreements supporting the ongoing O&M of the LMR System while providing a higher degree of predictability for Members / users.

The Revised Funding Plan identifies the total costs to operate and maintain the LMR System and proposes funding these costs via monthly fees paid by Subscriber users.

Variable Measurement
In order to mitigate variable measurement of cost factor, the LA-RICS Board-approved User Agreement identifies the cost-trigger as a piece of equipment with transmitting capability operating on the LMR System. The method by which agencies will be billed by device on the LMR System network is detailed in Section 3 of the Subscriber User Agreement (Appendix 4).

Section 2. Cost Allocation Method
This section details the cost allocation methodology for the Revised Funding Plan. The cost allocation simplifies the previously complex formula to pay for the ongoing O&M costs through Subscriber Agreements charging users a per device/equipment cost for transmitting on the LA-RICS LMR System network. Devices, equipment and radios programmed on the LA-RICS "LMR System will trigger billing with quarterly audits ensuring accurate cost allocation. The Revised Funding Plan considers the components of the ongoing O&M of the LMR System to the extent that they are known or can be estimated.

The objective of this section is to 1) detail costs of the ongoing O&M of the LA-RICS LMR System; and 2) highlight certain policy questions in financing the O&M of the LMR System that need to be addressed before a final Revised Funding Plan is submitted for review and approval by the LA-RICS Authority Board of Directors.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Cost Components of LA-RICS Land Mobile Radio System
The projected O&M costs assume execution of agreements for:

1. Maintenance and Warranty Options set forth in Agreement No. 007 with Motorola Solutions, Inc. ("MSI") for certain O&M scope – (Appendix 7 - 15 option years)

2. System Upgrade Agreement (SUA) with Motorola Solutions (Appendix 8 - 6 years)

3. Facilities maintenance services for certain O&M scope (Appendix 9 - term to be determined)

4. LA-RICS Authority Administration and Project Team (Appendix 10 – Adopted via annual operating budget process)
1 Please refer to Appendix 7, Exhibit C.6 – Schedule of Payments LMR System Maintenance – LA-RICS LMR Agreement with Motorola. The payments vary from year to year.

1. Maintenance and Warranty with Motorola Solutions (15 One-year Options) Components of LMR System cost include MSI-provided system maintenance costs (Phase 5) totaling approximately $56 million for the 15 one year contract option periods contained in Agreement No. 007 (Appendix 7).1 The Agreement with MSI provides the maintenance scope of services detailed in the attached Appendix 7.

2. System Upgrade Agreement (SUA) with Motorola Solutions (6 one-year options)
Components of LMR System cost in the current Adopted Funding Plan included an infrastructure component to account for replacement and technological upgrade and/or obsolescence. This infrastructure component, or capital replacement, was called the “Life Cycle Cost.” The Life Cycle Cost estimate was approximately $55 million as determined by the LA-RICS engineering consultant. The current Adopted Funding Plan took those capital replacement costs and spread them evenly over a 15-year period at approximately $5 million annually.

MSI now offers a System Upgrade Agreement that provides system software upgrades and replacement of obsolete equipment as needed to keep the LMR System current with and maintain optimal performance. At the time of Agreement No. 007 award and execution with MSI, as well as the adoption of the initial Funding Plan, this type of service agreement was not available and thus the Life Cycle Cost was included in its place. The System Upgrade Agreement provides scope and pricing over six (6) years totaling $22.5 million, annualized from $3.6M in year 1 to $3.9 million in year 6 (Appendix 8). Components of LMR System cost in the Revised Funding Plan include these projected costs pending final contract negotiations.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

3. Facilities Maintenance Agreement
Components of LMR System cost in the Revised Funding Plan include facilities and maintenance costs associated with services that were excluded from the MSI maintenance scope of work as well as excluded from the Adopted Funding Plan. The scope and corresponding cost are estimated at $6.7 million annually for items that include annual site inspections, generator refueling and maintenance, energy management, road maintenance, shelter maintenance, site weed abatement and pest control, and utilities (Appendix 9).

4. LA-RICS Authority Administration and Technical & Operations Costs Table 1

COST COMPONENTS
Adopted Funding
Plan
Cost Component Annual Cost Total
LMR System
Operations $3,700,000
System Refresh $4,800,000 $11,100,000
Administrative/JPA Operations $2,600,000
The Adopted Funding Plan included Administrative Costs that were divided into three areas, JPA Operational Cost, LMR Administration and LTE Administration totaling $2.6 million with annual 2% escalator to account for cost of living / salary increases. Unfortunately, there were no Technical and Operations costs included in the Adopted Funding Plan.

Components of LMR cost in the Revised Funding Plan include an amount for Authority administration, technical and operations branches of the project team. Similar to the Adopted Funding Plan, the Administrative costs include Executive Director and administrative staff over contracts, grants, budget and fiscal operations. The Administrative Costs also include the costs for County Counsel, the County Auditor Controller, services and supplies (S&S), travel and training, LA-RICS insurance and LA-RICS lease cost. LA-RICS administrative costs total approximately $3.2 million with 2% annual escalation.

Excluded from the Adopted Funding Plan are the Technical and Operations costs which in the Revised Funding Plan include six full-time engineering positions, as-needed tower and line workers, electronic communications technicians, mechanics and seven full-time public safety sworn positions. Additionally, Technical and Operations costs include various licenses required to operate and maintain the system such as cyber security monitoring software, document editing / document sharing licenses, and the license corresponding to the LA-RICS asset management system. Technical and Operations costs as well as Administrative Costs are detailed in Appendix 10.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Table 2

COST COMPONENTS
Revised Funding
Plan
Cost Component Annual Cost Total
LMR System
MSI O&M $3,400,000
$22,000,000
MSI SUA $3,700,000
Administrative Costs $3,200,000
Technical & Operations Costs $5,000,000
Facilities Maintenance $6,700,000

THE REVISED FUNDING PLAN DOES NOT COVER COSTS OF SUBSCRIBER UNITS The Adopted Funding Plan and Revised Funding Plan both maintain that Members and Users (either as Affiliates and Subscribers) are still fully responsible for the costs of their LMR Subscriber units including the costs of buying, maintaining, operating and replacing the following:
 Portable radios
 Mobile radios
 Base stations
 Dispatch consoles
 Joint Powers Authority Administration: Distribution of 40% of Authority staff and operating costs based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50% (effective FY 2014/2015).  LMR System Operating Costs:
o No costs will be allocated or collected for the LMR System from Members until such time as the system is operational (projected FY 2017/18), unless the Authority Board adopts a revised Funding Plan, including to account for any loss or shortage of grant funds.
o Additionally, the Authority’s Board will issue an amendment to the Funding Plan to reflect projected operational and maintenance costs prior to the operation of the LMR System.

Cost Apportionment – Adopted Funding Plan
The Adopted Funding Plan apportioning of costs to the Members was based on the following method and assumptions um :

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

Cost Apportionment – Revised Funding Plan
The Revised Funding Plan proposes simplification of cost apportionment whereby costs would be offset by revenue collected by Subscriber users of the network. A Subscriber user of the LMR System is not required to be a Member, and conversely a Member is not required to be a Subscriber of the LMR System. Establishing a cost per device transmitting on the LMR System provides the predictability of costs needed to enable broad user participation while eliminating cost variables that could encourage Member opt out.op
Mutual Aid Agreement Affiliates
The LA-RICS Board voted to delegate authority to the Executive Director to enter into no-cost Affiliate Agreements with Users of the LA-RICS LMR System as detailed in Appendix 5.

Cash Flow
The Revised Funding Plan identifies revenue from Subscriber users of the LMR System as well as grant funds for the ongoing maintenance of this federally-funded system as the primary fund o The cost of operation during the first year of operation (projected FY 2017/18) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
o The cost of operation during the second and third years of operation (projected FY 2018/19) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs and the full cost of LMR System maintenance based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
o The cost of operation during the fourth and subsequent years of operation (projected FY 2020/21) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs and the full cost of LMR System maintenance based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
b. LMR System refresh based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.

LA-RICS REVISED Funding Plan

source for ongoing O&M costs. The User Agreement approved by the LA-RICS Board identifies the monthly fees per number of active radios and / or radio equipment registered on the LMR System in accordance with Section 1.4 and Exhibit C of the Agreement (Appendix 4).

Section 3. Data Monitoring and True Up Period
The Adopted Funding Plan cost model used population and geography as inputs to derive each member cost shares. Given these variable cost factors the Adopted Funding Plan recommended a True Up period to verify/revise the allocation. The Revised Funding Plan relies on language captured in the LA-RICS Board-adopted User Agreements which provides for billing of Subscriber units when such devices are programmed and using the LMR System network. In addition, periodic audits will be performed to ensure accurate billing.

Appendix 1
LA-RICS Joint Powers Agreement
The Los Angeles
Regional Interoperable
Communications System
Authority
Joint Powers Agreement
January 2009
APPENDIX 1
The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority Joint Powers Agreement
Table of Contents
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc
RECITALS ....................................................................................................................... 1 Article I - GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................ 1

1.01 Purpose. ......................................................................................................... 1

1.02 Creation of Authority. ...................................................................................... 2

1.03 Membership in the Authority. .......................................................................... 2

1.04 Term. .............................................................................................................. 2 Article II - Board of Directors. ......................................................................................... 3

2.01 Composition of the Board ............................................................................... 3

2.02 Appointment of Directors ................................................................................ 3

2.03 Purpose of Board. ........................................................................................... 4

2.04 Specific Responsibilities of the Board. ............................................................ 5

2.05 Startup Responsibilities .................................................................................. 6

2.06 Meetings of the Board. .................................................................................... 7

2.07 Minutes. .......................................................................................................... 7

2.08 Voting. ............................................................................................................. 7

2.09 Quorum; Required Votes; Approvals. ............................................................. 7 Article III - OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES ....................... 8

3.01 Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. .............................................. 8

3.02 Treasurer. ....................................................................................................... 8

3.03 Auditor. ........................................................................................................... 9

3.04 Bonding of Persons Having Access to Property. ............................................ 9

3.05 Other Employees. ........................................................................................... 9

3.06 Privileges and Immunities from Liability. ......................................................... 9

3.07 Advisory Committees. ..................................................................................... 9

3.08 Membership of Advisory Committees. .......................................................... 10

3.09 Meetings of Advisory Committees. ................................................................ 10

3.10 Officers of Advisory Committees. .................................................................. 10 Article IV - POWERS .................................................................................................... 10

4.01 General Powers. ........................................................................................... 10

4.02 Power to Issue Bonds. .................................................................................. 10

4.03 Specific Powers. ........................................................................................... 11

4.04 Limitation on Exercise of Powers. ................................................................. 12

4.05 Obligations of Authority. ................................................................................ 12

4.06 Additional Powers to be Exercised. ............................................................... 12 APPENDIX 1
The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority Joint Powers Agreement
Table of Contents
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc
Article V - CONTRIBUTIONS; ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS; FUNDS ........................ 12

5.01 Adoption of Funding Plan. ............................................................................. 12

5.02 Contributions. ................................................................................................ 13

5.03 Accounts and Reports. .................................................................................. 13

5.04 Funds. ........................................................................................................... 13

5.05 Sharing of Frequencies. ................................................................................ 14

5.06 Violations. ..................................................................................................... 14

5.07 System Components. .................................................................................... 14

5.08 Adverse Impacts on System. ........................................................................ 15 Article VI - WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION ......................................................... 15

6.01 Withdrawal by Members. .............................................................................. 15

6.02 Financial Liabilities of Withdrawing Members. .............................................. 16

6.03 Retention of Assets by Withdrawing Members. ............................................ 16

6.04 Termination of Authority and Disposition of Authority Assets. ....................... 16 Article VII - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ............................................................. 17

7.01 Notices. ......................................................................................................... 17

7.02 Amendment; Addition of Members. ............................................................... 18

7.03 Fiscal Year. ................................................................................................... 18

7.04 Consents and Approvals. .............................................................................. 18

7.05 Amendments to Act....................................................................................... 18

7.06 Enforcement of Authority. ............................................................................. 18

7.07 Severability. .................................................................................................. 18

7.08 Successors. .................................................................................................. 19

7.09 Assignment. .................................................................................................. 19

7.10 Governing Law. ............................................................................................. 19

7.11 Headings. ...................................................................................................... 19

7.12 Counterparts. ................................................................................................ 19

7.13 No Third Party Beneficiaries. ........................................................................ 19

7.14 Filing of Notice of Agreement. ....................................................................... 19

7.15 Conflict of Interest Code. .............................................................................. 19

7.16 Indemnification. ............................................................................................. 19

7.17 Dispute Resolution/Legal Proceedings. ........................................................ 20 Exhibit
A – Members
APPENDIX 1
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 1 Joint Powers Agreement to Establish
The Los Angeles Regional
Interoperable Communications System Authority
THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the Effective Date by and between the public agencies set forth in Exhibit A.

Each public agency executing this Agreement shall be referred to individually as “Member,” with all referred to collectively as “Members.”

RECITALS
Whereas the Members require wide area and interoperable communications, and Members acting independently have limited resources to construct a communications network providing these capabilities; and,
Whereas the Members have determined that working in concert to share radio communications resources is in the public interest, as doing so would provide the most effective and economical radio communications network for all participating public agencies; and,
Whereas the Members agree that the collective goal is to evaluate, establish, and participate in a public safety radio network to meet or enhance current public safety radio communications needs of Members and to provide an architecture capable of expanding to meet future needs; and,
Whereas, the Members have the authority under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, in California Government Code Section 6500 et. seq., (the “Act”) to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligations of the Members as herein contained, the Members agree as follows:

Article I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.01 Purpose.

This Agreement is to create an agency to exercise the powers shared in common by its Members to engage in regional and cooperative planning and coordination of governmental services to establish a wide-area interoperable public safety communications network (hereinafter referred to as the “Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System”, “LA-RICS”, or the “System”). As part of this APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 2 purpose, Members will seek to meet or enhance the current public safety communications needs with a System capable of expanding to meet future needs; develop funding mechanisms; and resolve technical and operational issues in the development and management of the System. Such purposes are to be accomplished and said common power exercised in the manner hereinafter set forth.

1.02 Creation of Authority.

Pursuant to the Act, the Members hereby create a public entity to be known as the “Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority” (hereinafter, the “Authority”). The Authority shall be a public entity separate and apart from the Members who shall administer this Agreement. The jurisdiction of the Authority shall be all territory within the geographic boundaries of the Members; however the Authority may undertake any action outside such geographic boundaries as is necessary and incidental to the accomplishment of its purpose.

1.03 Membership in the Authority.

Participation in the Authority is limited to public agencies, as defined by the Act, in the greater Los Angeles area that have approved and executed this Agreement, and contributed resources of any kind toward the construction and/or on-going operation of the System (including, but not limited to financial, personnel, frequency, equipment, radio site, real estate or other resources), as approved by the Board of Directors.

1.04 Term.

This Agreement shall become effective, and the Authority shall come into existence, when each of the following occurs (the “Effective Date”):
(a) The Agreement is authorized and executed by the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles; and
(b) Forty-five days has elapsed after the authorization and execution of the Agreement by both the City of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles.

Prior to the Effective Date, public agencies may become Members of the Authority, without Board approval, by adoption and execution of this Agreement. After the Effective Date, membership is subject to approval by the Board as set forth in Section

7.02(a) of this document.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 3 Article II - Board of Directors.

2.01 Composition of the Board
The Authority shall be administered by a Board of Directors (the “Board”) consisting of a minimum of eight (8) Directors and not more than seventeen (17) Directors identified by the following appointing authorities:

1. The City of Los Angeles City Administrative Officer

2. The City of Los Angeles Fire Chief

3. The City of Los Angeles Police Chief

4. The City of Los Angeles Chief Legislative Analyst

5. The County of Los Angeles Chief Executive Officer

6. The County of Los Angeles Fire Chief

7. The Sheriff of Los Angeles County

8. The County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Director

9. The Los Angeles Unified School District Police Chief

10. The City of Long Beach

11. The Los Angeles Area Fire Chiefs Association

12. The Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association

13. The California Contract Cities Association

14. At Large

15. At Large

16. At Large

17. At Large

2.02 Appointment of Directors
(a) Each of the officials listed in 1 through 9 above may appoint one Director and one Alternate Director to the Board when the agency such official represents becomes a Member.
(b) The City of Long Beach may appoint one Director and one Alternate Director to the Board when the City of Long Beach becomes a Member. (c) Each of the Associations listed in 11 and 12 above may appoint one Director and one Alternate Director to the Board when at least one member of their respective Association becomes a Member of the Authority. (d) The California Contract Cities Association may appoint one Director and one Alternate Director to the Board when at least one member of the Association becomes a Member of the Authority. In order to participate in the selection process, Association members must also be Members of the Authority.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 4 (e) At Large Directors and Alternate Directors shall be selected by a majority vote of Member cities, other than the Cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach, as follows:
(1) One At Large Director (and one Alternate Director) must represent a Member city that operates both independent police and fire departments; (2) Two At Large Directors (and two Alternates) must represent Member cities that operate an independent police department and/or an independent fire department; and
(3) One At Large Director (and one Alternate Director) must represent a Member city not otherwise represented on the Board.
(f) Within fifteen (15) days after the Effective Date, eligible Member cities shall endeavor to meet and provide for the selection of the At Large Directors and Alternate Directors, and all other entities shall endeavor to appoint their Directors and Alternates. The logistics for filling the At Large Director and Alternate Director vacancies shall be provided for in the bylaws.
(g) At the time of appointment and for the duration of service, Directors and Alternate Directors shall be employees or officers of Members. All Directors and Alternate Directors shall be non-elected officials, with the sole exception of the Los Angeles County Sheriff.
(h) The term of office of each Director and Alternate Director shall be two years, or until a successor has been appointed. Directors and Alternate Directors may serve an unlimited number of terms.
(i) No Member can hold more than one seat on the Board concurrently, except that the County of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles can hold the Board seats designated by the eight individuals listed in items 1 through 8 in Section 2.01. (j) An Alternate Director may act in their Director’s absence and shall exercise all rights and privileges of a Director.
(k) Each Director and each Alternate Director shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority and may be removed by the appointing authority at any time without notice.
(l) Notice of any removal or appointment of a Director or Alternate Director shall be provided in writing to the Chair of the Board.

2.03 Purpose of Board.

The general purpose of the Board is to:

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 5 (a) Provide structure for administrative and fiscal oversight; (b) Identify and pursue funding sources;
(c) Set policy;
(d) Maximize the utilization of available resources; and (e) Oversee all Committee activities.

2.04 Specific Responsibilities of the Board.

The specific responsibilities of the Board shall be as follows:
(a) Identify participating entities needs and requirements; (b) Develop and implement a funding plan (the "Funding Plan") for the construction and on-going operation of a shared voice and data system; (c) Formulate and adopt the budget prior to the commencement of the fiscal year; (d) Hire necessary and sufficient staff and adopt personnel rules and regulations; (e) Adopt rules for procuring supplies, equipment and services; (f) Adopt rules for the disposal of surplus property;
(g) Establish committees as necessary to ensure that the interests and concerns of each user agency are represented and to ensure operational, technical and financial issues are thoroughly researched and analyzed;
(h) Provide for System implementation and monitoring;
(i) Determine the most appropriate and cost effective maintenance plan for the System;
(j) Provide for System maintenance;
(k) Adopt and revise System operating policies and procedures, as well as technical and maintenance requirements;
(l) Review and adopt recommendations regarding the establishment of System priorities and talk groups;
(m) Address concerns of all System user agencies;
(n) Oversee the establishment of long-range plans;
APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 6 (o) Conduct and oversee System audits at intervals not to exceed three years; (p) Arrange for an annual independent fiscal audit;
(q) Adopt such bylaws, rules and regulations as are necessary for the purposes hereof; provided that nothing in the bylaws, rules and regulations shall be inconsistent with this Agreement; and
(r) Discharge other duties as appropriate or required by statute.

2.05 Startup Responsibilities
The Authority shall have the duty to do the following within the specified timeframe or, if no time is specified, within a reasonable time:
(a) To establish within three (3) months of the Effective Date of this Agreement the Advisory Committees designated in Section 3.07;
(b) To use its best efforts to develop and adopt within nine (9) months of the Effective Date of this Agreement:
(1) A plan specifying a means or formula for determining the timing and sequencing of construction of the System consistent with the functional specifications; and
(2) A Funding Plan specifying a means or formula for funding the construction, operation and maintenance of the System; such Funding Plan shall include an allocation of costs among the Members, subscribers, and other funding sources;
(c) To establish System participation pricing including start-up costs, and ongoing Subscriber/Member unit pricing to cover System operations, technical upgrades, and System replacement reserves;
(d) To encourage other governmental and quasi-governmental agencies, including but not limited to, the State and Federal government, and special districts, to participate in LA-RICS;
(e) To establish policies and procedures for the voluntary transfer and/or sharing of assets from Members;
(f) To retain legal counsel; and
(g) To evaluate the need for, acquire and maintain necessary insurance.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 7

2.06 Meetings of the Board.
(a) Regular Meetings. The Board shall provide for its regular meetings provided, however, that at least one regular meeting shall be held quarterly. The date, hour and location of regular meetings shall be fixed by resolution of the Board and a copy of the resolution shall be transmitted to each of the Members. (b) Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chair or as provided for in the bylaws.
(c) Call, Notice and Conduct of Meetings. All meetings of the Board, including without limitation, regular, adjourned regular and special meetings, shall be called noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M.

Brown Act (commencing with California Government Code section 54950). As soon as practicable, but no later than the time of posting, the Secretary shall provide notice and the agenda to each Member, Director and Alternate Director. (d) First Meeting. The first meeting of the Board shall be no sooner than fifteen (15) days after the Effective Date.

2.07 Minutes.

The Secretary shall cause to be kept minutes of the meetings of the Board and shall, as soon as practicable after each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be made available to each Director, the Members and other parties upon request.

2.08 Voting.

All voting power of the Authority shall reside in the Board. Each Director shall have one vote. An Alternate Director may participate and vote in the proceedings of the Board only in the absence of that Alternate’s Director. No absentee ballot or proxy shall be permitted.

2.09 Quorum; Required Votes; Approvals.

A majority of the appointed Directors shall constitute a quorum of the Board for the transaction of business except that less than a quorum or the Secretary may adjourn meetings of the Board from time-to-time. The affirmative votes of a majority of the appointed Directors shall be required to take any action by the Board, except, two-thirds vote (or such greater vote as required by state law) of the appointed Directors shall be required to take any action on the following:
(a) Establish start-up contributions from Members;
(b) Adopt a Funding Plan;
APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 8 (c) Subject to prior approval by the passage of an authorizing ordinance or other legally sufficient action by the affected jurisdiction, levy and collect, or cause to be collected, communication impact fees on new residential, commercial, and industrial development, as authorized by local, state, and federal law; (d) Change the designation of Treasurer or Auditor of the Authority; (e) Issue bonds or other forms of debt;
(f) Adopt or amend the bylaws; and
(g) Subject to prior approval by the passage of an authorizing ordinance or other legally sufficient action by the affected jurisdiction, exercise the power of eminent domain.

Article III - OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES

3.01 Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary.

For each fiscal year, the Board shall elect a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson from among the Directors, and shall appoint a Secretary, who need not be a Director. In the event that the Chairperson, the Vice-Chairperson or Secretary so elected resigns from such office or his/her represented Member ceases to be a Member of the Authority, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next regular meeting of the Board held after such vacancy occurs or as soon as practicable thereafter. Succeeding officers shall perform the duties normal to said offices. The Chairperson shall sign all contracts on behalf of the Authority, and shall perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board. In the absence of the Chairperson, the Vice-Chairperson shall sign contracts and perform all of the Chairperson’s duties.

3.02 Treasurer.

The Treasurer and Tax Collector of the County of Los Angeles shall be the Treasurer of the Authority. To the extent permitted by the Act, the Board may change, by resolution, the Treasurer of the Authority.

The Treasurer shall be the depository, shall have custody of the accounts, funds and money of the Authority from whatever source, and shall have the duties and obligations set forth in the Act. For grants awarded to Members or third parties for use with the System, the Treasurer will work with the Member or third party to put in place appropriate fiscal controls to meet the grant requirements.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 9

3.03 Auditor.

The Auditor-Controller of the County of Los Angeles shall be the Auditor of the Authority. To the extent permitted by the Act, the Board may change, by resolution, the Auditor of the Authority.

The Auditor shall perform the functions of auditor for the Authority and shall make or cause an independent annual audit of the accounts and records of the Authority by a certified public accountant, in compliance with the requirements of the Act and generally accepted auditing standards.

3.04 Bonding of Persons Having Access to Property.

Pursuant to the Act, the Board shall designate the public officer or officers or person or persons who have charge of, handle, or have access to any property of the Authority and shall require such public officer or officers or person or persons to file an official bond in an amount to be fixed by the Board.

3.05 Other Employees.

The Board shall have the power by resolution to appoint and employ such other officers, employees, consultants and independent contractors as may be necessary to carry-out the purpose of this Agreement.

3.06 Privileges and Immunities from Liability.

All of the privileges and immunities from liability, exemption from laws, ordinances and rules, all pension, relief, disability, workers’ compensation and other benefits which apply to the activities of officers, agents or employees of a public agency when performing their respective functions shall apply to the officers, agents or employees of the Authority to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance of any of the functions and other duties of such officers, agents or employees under this Agreement. None of the officers, agents or employees directly employed by the Board shall be deemed, by reason of their employment by the Board to be employed by the Members or by reason of their employment by the Board, to be subject to any of the requirements of the Members.

3.07 Advisory Committees.

The Board shall establish the following Advisory committees:
(a) Operations Committee – The Operations Committee’s primary purpose is to review and recommend to the Board operating policies and procedures that will ensure the System resources are used efficiently to meet the needs of all Members. (b) Technical Committee – The Technical Committee’s primary purpose is to review and recommend to the Board policies and procedures related to System performance, maintenance and other technical issues.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 10 (c) Finance Committee – The Finance Committee’s primary purpose is to review and recommend to the Board:
(1) The Funding Plan;
(2) A fiscal year budget; and
(3) Financial policies and procedures to ensure equitable contributions by Members.
(d) Legislative Committee – The Legislative Committee’s primary purpose is to review and recommend to the Board a plan for securing funding from state and federal governments and to advise the Board on regulatory and legislative matters.

3.08 Membership of Advisory Committees.

Each Director shall appoint one voting member to each Advisory Committee.

3.09 Meetings of Advisory Committees.

All meetings of each Advisory Committee shall be held in accordance with the Ralph M.

Brown Act. For the purposes of convening meetings and conducting business, unless otherwise provided in the bylaws, a majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum or the secretary of each Advisory Committee may adjourn meetings from time-to-time. As soon as practicable, but no later than the time of posting, the Secretary of the Committee shall provide notice and the agenda to each Member, Director and Alternate Director.

3.10 Officers of Advisory Committees.

Unless otherwise determined by the Board, each Advisory Committee shall choose its officers, comprised of a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson and a Secretary.

Article IV - POWERS

4.01 General Powers.

The Authority shall have the powers common to the Members and which are necessary or convenient to the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 4.04. As provided in the Act, the Authority shall be a public entity separate from the Members.

4.02 Power to Issue Bonds.

The Authority shall have all of the powers provided in Articles 2 and 4 of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the California Government Code, including the power to issue bonds thereunder.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 11

4.03 Specific Powers.

The Authority is hereby authorized, in its own name, to perform all acts necessary for the exercise of the foregoing powers, including but not limited to, any or all of the following:
(a) To make and enter into contracts, including but not limited to, agreements for the purpose of acquiring real and/or personal property, equipment, employment contracts and professional services agreements;
(b) To make and enter into contracts with subscribers who desire to utilize the System for their primary radio communications and affiliates who desire to utilize the System only for mutual or automatic aid;
(c) To acquire, construct, maintain, or operate telecommunications systems or service and to provide the equipment necessary to deliver public services therefrom; (d) To acquire, construct, manage, maintain or operate any building, works or improvements;
(e) To acquire, hold, lease, or dispose of property;
(f) To employ or engage contractors, agents, or employees; (g) To sue and be sued in its own name;
(h) To apply for, receive and utilize grants and loans from federal, state or local governments or from any other available source in order to pursue the purposes of the Authority;
(i) To issue bonds and to otherwise incur debts, liabilities and obligations, provided that no such bond, debt, liability or obligation shall constitute a debt, liability or obligation to the individual respective Members;
(j) To invest any money in the treasury, pursuant to the Act, which is not required for the immediate necessities of the Authority, as the Authority determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the California Government Code; and (k) To promulgate, adopt, and enforce any rules and regulations, as may be necessary and proper to implement and effectuate the terms, provisions, and purposes of this Agreement.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 12

4.04 Limitation on Exercise of Powers.

All common powers exercised by the Board shall be exercised in a manner consistent with, and subject to, the restrictions and limitations upon the exercise of such powers as are applicable to the County of Los Angeles, as may be amended from time to time.

4.05 Obligations of Authority.

The debts, liabilities and obligations of the Authority shall not be the debts, liabilities and obligations of the Members. In addition, pursuant to the Act, no Director shall be personally liable on the bonds or subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance of bonds.

4.06 Additional Powers to be Exercised.

In addition to those powers common to each of the Members, the Authority shall have those powers that may be conferred upon it by subsequently enacted legislation.

Article V - CONTRIBUTIONS; ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS; FUNDS

5.01 Adoption of Funding Plan.

It is a critical goal of the Authority to develop a Funding Plan that identifies funding sources and mechanisms, including a development schedule and phasing plan, which will permit the maximum feasible participation by Members. The Funding Plan shall be descriptive as to the contributions required from Members.

Prior to committing resources for the construction of the System, a proposed Funding Plan as designated in Section 2.05(b)(2) shall be developed.

In order for the Funding Plan to be considered by the Members prior to its adoption, the Board shall distribute the proposed Funding Plan to Members pursuant to Section 7.01.

The proposed Funding Plan shall be accompanied by a description of the System, and reports and studies to allow Members to determine the System capability, cost, financing and the effects on individual Members. The Board shall also designate a period, which shall be not less than 60 days, during which Members may provide comments to the Board regarding the proposed Funding Plan.

After the comment period has expired, the Board may:
(a) Adopt the Funding plan as proposed;
(b) Revise the Funding Plan to address some or all of the Member comments; or (c) Reconsider the Funding Plan at a later date.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 13 Notice shall be given to Members pursuant to Section 7.01 within five days of adoption of the Funding Plan. The notice shall include a copy of the adopted Funding Plan. The Board shall also designate a period, which shall be not less than 35 days after the Funding Plan is adopted, during which Members may submit written notice of immediate withdrawal from the Authority. There will be no costs for any Member that withdraws from the Authority within this time period.

After the Funding Plan has been adopted, and until contracts are awarded to design and/or construct the System, if the Funding Plan is revised in a manner which will substantially increase the financial obligations of the Members, then any Member so affected will have a further right to withdraw within a period designated by the Board, which shall be not less than 45 days after the adoption of the Revised Funding Plan.

There will be no costs for any Member that withdraws from the Authority within this time period, except for obligations incurred prior to the adoption of the Revised Funding Plan.

5.02 Contributions.

The Members may, in the appropriate circumstance, or when required hereunder:
(a) Make contributions from their treasuries for the purposes set forth herein; (b) Make payments of public funds to defray the cost of such purposes; (c) Make advances of public funds for such purposes, such advances to be repaid as provided by written agreement; or
(d) Use its personnel, equipment or property in lieu of other contributions or advances.

No Member shall be required to adopt any tax, assessment, fee or charge under any circumstances.

5.03 Accounts and Reports.

The Treasurer shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice or by any provision of any trust agreement entered into with respect to the proceeds of any bonds issued by the Authority. The books and records of the Authority in the hands of the Treasurer shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by duly appointed representatives of the Members.

The Treasurer, within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year, shall give a complete written report of all financial activities for such fiscal year to the Members.

5.04 Funds.

The Treasurer shall receive, have custody of and/or disburse Authority funds in accordance with the laws applicable to public agencies and generally accepted APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 14 accounting practices, and shall make the disbursements required by this Agreement in order to carry out any of the purposes of this Agreement.

5.05 Sharing of Frequencies.

Members holding Federal Communication Commission (FCC) licenses to frequencies (“Licensee(s)”) shall authorize the Authority to share the use of such frequencies and/or radio stations. Such use shall be in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, (47 CFR 90.179).

Any authorization for the use of such license shall be made pursuant to a written agreement between the Member and Authority. Revoking such authorization requires Member to provide twelve (12) months advance written notice to the Authority unless otherwise identified in written agreement. Licenses shall remain primary to the Member holding the license. Only the Member is allowed to make any modifications to its license(s) on behalf of the Authority, and the Authority shall pay all associated fees.

5.06 Violations.

Payment of fines and penalties imposed for operational or equipment violations shall be the responsibility of the entity committing the violation. If the entity responsible for a violation is not the FCC Licensee, then the responsible entity shall pay forthwith any fines imposed upon the Licensee, as specified in the bylaws.

5.07 System Components.

The System is comprised of components that include physical plant, infrastructure, frequencies, user equipment, and dispatch center equipment ( the “System Components”) as described in this Section 5.07. Members shall retain ownership of System Components that they contribute to construct or operate the System, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. The Authority shall retain ownership of System Components purchased by the Authority, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. (a) Physical Plant: The Physical Plant includes the following: real estate, shelters, environmental controls, antenna support structures, power systems, security systems, and other site structures. The maintenance of the Physical Plant shall be in accordance with the requirements specified by the Authority and is the responsibility of the contributing Member, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. (b) Infrastructure: Infrastructure includes the following: antenna systems, base station repeaters, diagnostic and alarm systems, microwave systems, backhaul systems, control equipment and all other related electronic equipment and software.

The Authority is responsible for the operation and maintenance of Infrastructure. (c) Frequencies: Frequencies are radio channels that have been licensed by the FCC in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations. Licensees shall authorize APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 15 the Authority to share the use of such frequencies and/or radio stations subject to a separate frequency sharing agreement.
(d) User Equipment: User Equipment includes the following: mobile radios, portable radios, mobile data computers, radio data modems, control stations, and other related equipment. All User Equipment shall meet or exceed the minimum acceptable standards established by the Authority. In the event that any User Equipment is determined to be affecting the proper operation of the overall System as identified by the Authority, such User Equipment shall be immediately removed from service and shall not be returned to service until any deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of the Authority. The Authority shall maintain a list of User Equipment approved for operation on the System. Any changes to the User Equipment list shall be approved by the Authority. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(e) Dispatch Center Equipment: Dispatch Center Equipment includes the following: dispatch consoles, logging recorders, system interfaces, and other ancillary equipment. The Authority shall maintain a list of Dispatch Center Equipment approved for operation on the System. Any changes to the Dispatch Center Equipment list shall be approved by the Authority. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

5.08 Adverse Impacts on System.

No Member, subscriber or affiliate shall take any action that adversely impacts the System. If the System is impacted by actions of a Member, subscriber or affiliate, the offending party shall take immediate action to return the System to its full operating state. The Authority, or its designee as set forth in the bylaws, shall make the sole determination of whether Member, subscriber or affiliate equipment or operations adversely impact the System.

Article VI - WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION

6.01 Withdrawal by Members.

After the periods referred to in Section 5.01, Members may withdraw from the Authority by giving notice as follows:
(a) Members who do not provide Infrastructure, Frequencies or Physical Plant to System shall provide to the Chairperson ninety (90) days advanced written notice of its intent to withdraw from the Authority;
APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 16 (b) Members who provide Infrastructure, Frequencies or Physical Plant to System shall provide to the Chairperson twelve (12) months advanced written notice of its intent to withdraw from the Authority.

6.02 Financial Liabilities of Withdrawing Members.

Except as otherwise provided in Section 5.01:
(a) A withdrawing Member shall remain liable for all financial liabilities incurred during its membership in the Authority; however, the Member shall not be liable for any new financial liabilities incurred after submitting written notice to withdraw. (b) The withdrawing Member must continue to pay its share of operating costs during the ninety day or twelve month period, as applicable, after submitting its written notice of the intent to withdraw.
(c) The Authority and the withdrawing Member may negotiate a buy-out agreement for early termination of membership to retire any ongoing financial obligations the Member shares with the Authority.
(d) If a withdrawing Member holds a seat on the Board, that Member’s participation on the Board shall immediately cease when the written notice to withdraw is submitted.

6.03 Retention of Assets by Withdrawing Members.

Each Member shall hold its licenses and retain sole ownership of its licenses, including those authorized for use by the Member to the Authority. The licenses and any System Components provided by a Member to the Authority shall remain the sole asset of that Member unless otherwise negotiated. If requested by the Authority, the withdrawing Member shall consider options for the Authority’s continued use of Member assets.

Acceptance of any option is at the sole discretion of the withdrawing Member. In addition, the use by the Authority of the withdrawing Member’s System Components shall be terminated upon the effective date of withdrawal (twelve months from initial notice), and such System Components shall remain the sole asset of the withdrawing Member, unless otherwise agreed. Such withdrawing Member shall have no interest or claim in any remaining assets of the Authority, the Board, or of any of the remaining Members.

6.04 Termination of Authority and Disposition of Authority Assets.

Upon termination of this Agreement and dissolution of the Authority by all Members, and after payment of all obligations of the Authority, the Board:
(a) May sell or liquidate Authority property; and
APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 17 (b) Shall distribute assets, including real or personal property, in proportion to the contributions made by Members.

Any System Components provided by a Member to the Authority shall remain the asset of that Member and shall not be subject to distribution under this section.

Article VII - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

7.01 Notices.

Any notice required or permitted to be made hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in the manner prescribed herein at the principal place of business of each party. The parties may give notice by:
(a) Personal delivery;
(b) E-mail;
(c) U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid;
(d) “Certified” U.S. mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; (e) Facsimile; or
(f) Any other method deemed appropriate by the Board.

At any time, by providing written notice to the other parties to this Agreement, any party may change the place, facsimile number or e-mail for giving notice. All written notices or correspondence sent in the described manner will be deemed given to a party on whichever date occurs earliest:
(a) The date of personal delivery;
(b) The third business day following deposit in the U.S. mail, when sent by “first class” mail;
(c) The date on which the party or its agent either signed the return receipt or refused to accept delivery, as noted on the return receipt or other U.S. Postal Service form, when sent by “certified” mail; or
(d) The date of transmission, when sent by e-mail or facsimile.

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 18

7.02 Amendment; Addition of Members.
(a) In addition to the original signatories to this Agreement, other public agencies may join the Authority as a Member, subject to the provisions of Section 1.03. The addition of any Member shall become effective upon:
(1) The execution on behalf of such entity of a counterpart of this Agreement and the delivery of such executed counterpart to the Board; and (2) The adoption of a resolution of the Board admitting that agency to the Authority.
(b) This Agreement may only be amended by two-thirds of the Members, which must include the affirmative votes of the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles, evidenced by the execution of a written amendment to this Agreement.

However, this Agreement shall not be amended, modified or otherwise revised, changed or rescinded, if such action would:
(1) Materially and adversely affect either the rating of bonds issued by the Authority, or bondholders holding such bonds; or
(2) Limit or reduce the obligations of the Members to make, in the aggregate, payments which are for the benefit of the owners of the bonds.

7.03 Fiscal Year.

The Authority’s 12-month fiscal year shall be specified in the Authority’s bylaws.

7.04 Consents and Approvals.

Any consents or approvals required under this Agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld.

7.05 Amendments to Act.

The provisions of the Act, as it may be amended from time to time, which are required to be included in this Agreement, are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference.

7.06 Enforcement of Authority.

The Authority is hereby authorized to take any or all legal or equitable actions, including but not limited to injunction and specific performance, necessary or permitted by law to enforce this Agreement.

7.07 Severability.

If any one or more of the terms, provisions, promises, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement were, to any extent, adjudged invalid, unenforceable, void, or voidable for APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 19 any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, each and all of the remaining terms, provisions, promises, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

7.08 Successors.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of each Member.

7.09 Assignment.

No Member shall assign any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Board.

7.10 Governing Law.

This Agreement is made and to be performed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and as such California substantive and procedural law shall apply.

7.11 Headings.

The section headings herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing the language of this Agreement.

7.12 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts.

7.13 No Third Party Beneficiaries.

This Agreement and the obligations hereunder are not intended to benefit any party other than the Authority and its Members, except as expressly provided otherwise herein. No entity that is not a signatory to this Agreement shall have any rights or causes of action against any party to this Agreement as a result of that party’s performance or non-performance under this Agreement, except as expressly provided otherwise herein.

7.14 Filing of Notice of Agreement.

Within 30 days after the Effective Date, or amendment thereto, the Secretary shall cause to be filed with the Secretary of State the notice of Agreement required by the Act.

7.15 Conflict of Interest Code.

The Board shall adopt a conflict of interest code as required by law.

7.16 Indemnification.

The Authority shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each Member (and each Member’s officers, agents, and employees) from any and all liability, including but not limited to claims, losses, suits, injuries, damages, costs and expenses (including APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 20 attorney’s fees), arising from or as a result of any acts, errors or omissions of the Authority or its officers, agents or employees.

7.17 Dispute Resolution/Legal Proceedings.

Disputes regarding the interpretation or application of any provision of this Agreement shall, to the extent reasonably feasible, be resolved through good faith negotiations between the Members and/or the Authority.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Member has caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, its official seals to be hereto affixed, as follows:

APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc Page 21 City of Authorization
For Membership in the Los Angeles Regional Interoperability Communications System Authority (LA-RICS)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of , by order of its City
Council, has caused this Joint Powers Agreement to be executed on its behalf by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, as of the date so attested below. __________________________________________

MAYOR DATE
ATTEST:
_______________________________________

CITY CLERK DATE
APPENDIX 1
Joint Powers Agreement
Exhibit A - Members
LA-RICS_JPA_2009-08-19 (1) Revised 5.13.2016doc.doc
The following entities are Members of the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority:

1. Avalon

2. Azusa

3. Bell

4. Cerritos

5. Claremont

6. Compton

7. County of Los Angeles

8. Covina

9. Glendora

10. Hawaiian Gardens

11. Inglewood

12. Inglewood Unified SD

13. Irwindale

14. La Puente

15. La Verne

16. Lynwood

17. Maywood

18. Pasadena

19. Rancho Palos Verdes

20. San Fernando

21. Sierra Madre

22. Signal Hill

23. UCLA

24. West Covina
APPENDIX 1
Appendix 2
Adopted Funding Plan –
May 28, 2014

FUNDING PLAN
PREPARED BY: June 2, 2014
APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Section 1. Funding Plan Overview ...................................................................................................... 13 Section 2. Background Research ........................................................................................................ 15 Section 3. Member Outreach ............................................................................................................. 15 Section 4. Cost Allocation Method ..................................................................................................... 15 Section 5. Data Monitoring and True-Up Period ............................................................................... 25 List of Tables
Table 1. Variables for LMR and LTE Cost Allocation Formulas ......................................................... 21 List of Figures
Figure 1. Cost Allocation Formula ...................................................................................................... 23 Appendices
Appendix 1 – March 6, 2014 – Draft Funding Plan
Appendix 2 – April 3, 2014 – Board-Authorized Modifications Appendix 3 – May 7, 2014 – Board Item on Comments Received on Draft Plan; Summary of Comments Received from Authority Members During 60-Day Comment Period Appendix 4 – August 15, 2013, LMR Board Letter and March 6, 2014, LTE Board Letter

APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 1
Executive Summary
The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System (LA-RICS) is a modern, integrated wireless voice and data communication system designed to serve law enforcement, fire service, and health service professionals throughout Los Angeles County. LA-RICS is a joint powers authority (Authority) with 86 Members currently, including the County of Los Angeles, 82 cities, two school districts, and the University of California, Los Angeles.

LA-RICS comprises two independent systems, which include a voice (land mobile radio, or LMR) system and a broadband data (long-term evolution, or LTE) system. LA-RICS will provide day-today communications within agencies and allow seamless interagency communications for responding to routine, emergency, and catastrophic events.

Per the Joint Powers Agreement (Agreement) adopted in 2009, the Authority must develop and adopt a Funding Plan before it commits resources to constructing the LMR or LTE systems (Ref.

Art. II, Sec. 2.04(b) and Sec. 2.05(b)(2); and Art. V, Sec. 5.01). This Funding Plan has been a long time in the making, given the Agreement specified that the Authority would use its “best efforts to develop and adopt within nine (9) months of the effective date of the Agreement…a Funding Plan specifying a means or formula for funding the construction, operation and maintenance of the System” (Ref. Art. II, Section 2.05(b)(2)).

The Funding Plan must identify “funding sources and mechanisms” (Art. V, Sec. 5.01). In particular, the Funding Plan must “specify a means or formula for funding the construction, operation and maintenance of the System; such Funding Plan shall include an allocation of costs among the Members, subscribers and other funding sources” (Art. II, Sec. 2.05(b)(2)). Further, the Funding Plan must provide a “development schedule and phasing plan, which will permit the maximum feasible participation by Members” (Art. V, Sec. 5.01). This latter requirement in the Agreement recognizes the great diversity among Members in the caliber of their LMR and existing broadband systems, as well as in their ability to internally support capital improvements and maintenance.

The Funding Plan presents LMR capital costs of approximately $205 million and annual costs of approximately $11 million for operations and capital replacement. It also addresses LTE capital costs of approximately $150 million, additional capital costs of approximately $17 million for additive alternates, and annual costs of approximately $10 million for operations and excludes capital replacement. The Funding Plan must identify funding sources and a means for allocating these costs among the Members.

The Funding Plan relies on grant monies for the initial construction of the LMR and LTE systems.

Member fees are to be the revenue source for the operations and maintenance (O&M) as well as all other capital costs. Voter assessments are not currently practical given the high cost of a ballot campaign coupled with high voter requirements to pass a special revenue measure. The LMR and LTE program costs can be divided into an infrastructure (initial capital or capital replacement) component and an O&M component. The financing model seeks to apportion costs to the Members relative to each Member’s ratio of population and geographic factors. As APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 2
stakeholder survey results revealed that Members do not prefer a fixed fee that is not tied to a Member’s specific impact to the communications system, the Funding Plan incorporates one or more measurable characteristics (population and geography) as a tool to determine each Member’s revenue contribution.

The Draft Funding Plan was authorized for release for comment to the Authority's Members on March 6, 2014. The Draft Funding Plan is attached as Appendix 1. On April 3, 2014, the Authority Board released a revised Cash Flow, which contemplated the Capital Replacement Reserve for the LMR System being deferred, with no accumulation, until the beginning of the fourth year of system operation. An administrative cost allocation for ongoing support of the Authority Operations at 20% of the overall administrative cost was included in the revision. This information is attached as Appendix 2.

The Board received a number of comments on the Draft Funding Plan during the 60-day comment period, a matrix of which is attached as Appendix 3.

In consideration of the feedback received during the 60-day comment period, the Draft Funding Plan was updated to reflect the responses to this information as well as input from the Finance Committee and Authority Board. The Funding Plan’s cost allocation is based on the following:
• All costs for administration, operations and maintenance, capital replacement, and hard match are calculated based on the population and geographic area of the Member agency. These two variables are weighted equally at 50% each.

The Funding Plan is predicated on Members participating in the system, and the contribution from each Member will be calculated on the number participating. The initial Cash Flow presented is predicated on full participation of every Member of the Authority. That is, the Member shares will be calculated assuming every potential Member is paying its indicated annual share. However, the Authority acknowledges that some Members may exercise their right to withdraw as allowed under the Agreement. A Member may make a financial decision to delay participation until such time as their communication system equipment completes its normal replacement cycle and thus the agency’s capital investment is fully amortized. The OptOut Period for the Funding Plan is 180 calendar days from March 28, 2014, the date of adoption of the Funding Plan by the Authority’s Board. The Authority's Board also set the 180 day period for withdrawal of Members, as provided for in Article V, Section 5.01 of the Agreement. In addition, the Funding Plan is required to be revisited in three years from date of adoption. As part of this requirement, LA-RICS will be required to evaluate the current cost allocation method and the system usage data and to determine whether any changes to the Funding Plan are required.

For every Member that chooses not to participate, its annual share of the cost must be assumed by the Authority should total system costs be higher than the revenues collected from early participating Members. Each year an agency does not become a Member or join LA-RICS, its allocated but unpaid cost share of the LTE hard match and LMR capital replacement will accumulate. In this instance, bridge financing may be required to make up the difference.

APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 3
Alternatively, early participating Members will likely absorb the costs of nonparticipants, resulting in a higher cost for the early Members. Should a Member rejoin the Authority at a later date, the Authority's Board will develop policy that addresses late adopters.

Some Members may have special radio or broadband coverage challenges (e.g., hilly terrain or clusters of tall buildings) that the standard backbone systems would be unable to meet. Those Members may require additional sites or facilities for an acceptable level of service. If so, those Members, and not LA-RICS, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority’s Board, may be responsible for the costs of building and maintaining these facilities. To the extent possible, LA-RICS will provide Bounded Area coverage enhancements. In-Building coverage will also be the responsibility of the Member agency that desires the coverage, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority’s Board. (Note that this does not preclude LA-RICS from being the agency that does the actual work of constructing or maintaining these facilities.) APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 4
Introduction
The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System (LA-RICS) is a modern, integrated wireless voice and data communication system designed to serve law enforcement, fire service, and health service professionals throughout Los Angeles County. LA-RICS is a joint powers authority (Authority) with 86 Members currently, including the County of Los Angeles, 82 cities, two school districts, and the University of California, Los Angeles. A system description of the LMR and LTE systems is provided below.

System Description System Description
Genesis of the Hybrid LMR System
In the summer of 2012, Jacobs Program Management, acting as the Authority’s LMR Program Manager, performed a hybrid UHF T-band and 700 MHz analysis to ascertain whether such a system could be deployed across the greater Los Angeles Region. The results of that study, as articulated in the “LA-RICS LMR Hybrid Feasibility Study” of July 7, 2012, indicated that a hybrid LMR System was feasible and that such a system would meet both LA-RICS’ near-term and longer-term public safety communications needs.

It was the conclusion of the study that a hybrid system utilizing both 700 MHz P25 and T-band P25 technologies could provide the LA-RICS user community with a LMR System capable of supporting first responders. The overall conclusion was predicated on the minimum requirement of utilizing seventy (70) 700 MHz channels. The utilization of T-band spectrum within the hybrid system is fully scalable, thus rendering the T-band component configurable to address concerns regarding the concentration of first responder assets in areas during emergency response.

The study concluded that a hybrid UHF T-band and 700 MHz system could:
• Support 34,000 users on the 700 MHz spectrum with the capacity to accommodate a 25% incident increase of users maintaining a 1% grade of service (GoS). Although T-band channels will support 34,000 users on the T-band spectrum with the capacity to accommodate a 25% incident increase of users maintaining a 1% GoS, real-life experience indicates the need for more capacity. The study recognized that there is additional Tband capacity available to meet the real-life requirements for 10 channels per site, as this was anticipated to be a requirement in the LMR RFP and ultimate contract. • Provide voice coverage per anticipated RFP requirements with the exception of the Angeles National Forest (ANF) areas (this is primarily due to a limited number of available tower facilities in the ANF, and coverage could be enhanced as additional sites become available).

APPENDIX 2
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 5
• Include a narrowband data subsystem that could replace three existing UHF mobile data systems with a single system having coverage and capacity that would meet anticipated LMR System requirements.
• Include the current ACVRS that will be maintained on UHF but could be upgraded to more modern equipment.
• Employ bi-directional amplifiers (BDAs) for in-building coverage as used in the existing T-band subsystems. The existing BDAs will be replaced and/or supplemented with 700 MHz BDAs as needed.

The selected contractor’s final design should be based on user input that would determine how the hybrid system implementation plan would be rolled out.

Following the July 2012 LMR Hybrid Feasibility Study, all pertinent requirements for a hybrid system were incorporated in the LMR System RFP. Due to the requirement to provide up to 10 channels per site for surge capacity for both UHF and T-band, it was determined that a pool of 700 MHz frequencies could be used to augment capacity at sites where event escalation might occur. As a result, LA-RICS required that proposers not exceed 90 700 MHz frequencies.

Two proposers provided proposals that addressed a hybrid system, and Motorola Solutions, Inc., was invited to negotiate. Subsequent to successful negotiations with Motorola, a contract was awarded by the Authority’s Board that would provide a hybrid LMR System for the greater Los Angeles Region.

Description of the LMR System Description of the LMR System The LMR System is a hybrid, integrated, regional, public safety wireless communications system operating primarily on UHF T-band channels and the 700 MHz spectrum. This Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) Project 25 Phase II capable wireless communications system will provide public safety first responders with mission critical voice and data communications supporting day-to-day, mutual aid, and task force operations. It will provide immediate and coordinated assistance in times of emergency, minimizing loss of life and property within the greater Los Angeles Region.

Furthermore, the LMR System will provide enhanced, interoperable communications through the following subsystems:
• Digital Trunked Voice Radio Subsystem (DTVRS): This DTVRS subsystem is considered the primary subsystem. It is a hybrid design that incorporates Project 25 Phase II equipment operating a voice communications network on both the UHF “T-band” spectrum and the 700 MHz band. Intra-subsystem network operations between users on the differing bands are transparent.
• Analog Conventional Voice Radio Subsystem (ACVRS): The interoperable ACVRS subsystem will interface with the hybrid UHF and 700 MHz DTVRS subsystem. ACVRS will APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 6
use narrow-banded UHF channels available to LA-RICS. ACVRS will consist of up to 22 Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) regionalized channels corresponding to each Telephone Radio Operator (TRO) operational service area. • Narrowband Mobile Data Network (NMDN): The NMDN subsystem will be available to all Member agencies. This subsystem’s data network will operate on UHF channels and provides reliable Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) connectivity. • Los Angeles Regional Tactical Communications Subsystem (LARTCS): The LARTCS subsystem will support public safety operations on VHF Low-Band, VHF High-Band, UHF, and 800 MHz. This subsystem provides DTVRS and ACVRS interoperating connectivity with legacy public safety system users that would not normally operate on LA-RICS’ primary subsystems.

Where possible, the LARTCS subsystem radio system attempts to logically share common infrastructure components.

System Capabilities and Advantages System Capabilities and Advantages The LMR System will facilitate and support Authority stakeholders’ day-to-day public safety voice and low-speed data communications needs, providing instantaneous mutual aid in the event of a man-made or natural disaster. As such, the LMR System provides communications surge capability and resiliency. It provides generous allowances for disaster recovery and future system growth.

The Authority will possess a public safety LMR System that will be technically sufficient. In addition to supporting day-to-day public safety voice and data communications needs, the LA-RICS LMR System also provides a much-needed migration path off the UHF T-band spectrum that must be vacated in 2023 pursuant to H.R. 3630, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Jobs Creation Bill of 2012.

Why is the hybrid approach the best option for LA-RICS at this time? • Removes LA-RICS from dependency on the federal government to make decisions regarding local spectrum and funding.
• Deploys an interoperable public safety radio network on Day 1 and buys time for later resolution with respect to future T-band frequency availability. • Buys time to position for the possibility of future spectrum availability in both 700 MHz and 800 MHz.
• Provides a baseline countywide system now that will easily accommodate expansion as users come on board.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 7
• Allows for a smooth, coordinated migration over time, and stays positioned for future FCC assistance with spectrum and funding.
• Minimizes risk of breakage and stranded assets.
• Utilizes existing ACVRS and narrowband data.
• Allows LA-RICS to prudently plan for yet-to-be-determined policies and direction from the FCC.

Effects on Members Existing Operations & Benefits Effects on Members Existing Operations & Benefits ts on Members Existing Operations & Benefits The benefits and advantages that Member agencies will gain with the LA-RICS hybrid LMR radio communications system, over their existing operations and for the next decade and beyond, are numerous and include:
• A truly countywide voice and narrow band mobile data system that provides coverage and capacity throughout the jurisdictions of all Member agencies. • Reuse of infrastructure assets leverages the investments that Members have made in existing sites and equipment.
• Cost savings are realized through centralized operations and maintenance of the LMR System.
• Cost avoidance will be achieved when the federal legislation to vacate the current UHF T-band occurs, as the Authority will not have to re-procure and re-deploy a new regional communications system.
• Coverage and capacity will meet or exceed operational requirements for all LMR subsystems and provide significant improvement over existing capabilities. • Designed-in system growth will provide long-term usability in response to population growth and additional operational requirements.
• The LMR System is being designed in a modular, scalable manner to allow the Authority to add or remove Members/users as needed, necessary, and appropriate. • The LMR System will allow Member agencies the flexibility to assume responsibility for LMR System maintenance as desired.
• There will be no single point of failure throughout the mission-critical DTVRS subsystem. • Geographically isolated LMR System controllers will provide redundancy in the event of a disaster.
• System-wide encryption provides LMR System security against cyber attacks.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 8
• The LMR System provides encrypted communications allowing each member Agency to conduct secure operations.
• The LMR System will achieve the Authority’s vision of regional communications interoperability.
• The LMR System will provide Member agencies operational and equipment options regarding end-of-life concerns for their current systems. • All hardware, firmware, and software licenses will be current as of the final acceptance. • Overall LA-RICS program objectives will be realized to the great benefit of all Members:
o Pooling of regional frequencies will be accomplished. o Reuse of existing infrastructure will be realized.
o Providing for interoperable day-to-day communications for all Members will finally become a reality.
o Providing instantaneous mutual aid communications will be realized. o Regional disaster recovery capabilities will be enhanced. o Factored-in future growth will be available.
o Positive reduction of duplication costs will be a reality. • Enhanced interoperable communications with federal, state, and other outside local agencies.
• Does not require members to invest capital dollars up front for UHF-capable subscriber units, but rather preserves individual agency equipment replacement/migration strategies. Members who operate exclusively on VHF, or who have outdated 700 MHz equipment, may choose to replace their subscriber equipment in order to take full advantage of the new hybrid network.
• Reduces the risk for all Members of deploying on a network that will be obsolete in less than a decade.
• Over the long term, 700 MHz will provide better interoperability with contiguous neighbors – Orange, Riverside, and other adjacent county users, since they are migrating to 700/800MHz.
• Potential exists for LA-RICS 700 MHz to be a direct backup for STRS and CWIRS – they currently have no backup capability.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 9
Description of the LTE System Description of the LTE System The Public Safety Broadband Network (PSBN) is a state-of-the-art wireless broadband system that provides high mobility public safety grade outdoor data services across Los Angeles County.

It uses the latest cellular technology, called Long Term Evolution (LTE), currently being deployed by the major cellular carriers worldwide. The PSBN is built to the higher public safety reliability standards in order to have service available when public safety needs communications most— during emergencies. The PSBN is capable of interoperability with the forthcoming FirstNet nationwide network as well as other Broadband Technology Opportunity Program (BTOP) grantfunded public safety systems. It uses the radio spectrum assigned to LA-RICS in its Spectrum Manager Lease Agreement (SMLA) with FirstNet. The PSBN consists of the following major subsystems:

LTE Subsystem – The LTE Subsystem consists of an LTE-compliant wireless broadband system.

LTE is a global standard established by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and represents the most advanced commercial wireless broadband technology available. The LTE Subsystem will enable the Authority to have the same system functionality as commercial wireless carriers. The LTE Subsystem will provide wireless mobile broadband service across Los Angeles County from a preliminary 229 “cell sites” (known as eNodeBs). Please note that the actual cell sites may vary from the numbers referenced in the Funding Plan, as the design is being refined based on a number of factors. It will provide broadband coverage to outdoor users using portable devices. The LTE Subsystem will meet various Key Performance Indicator (KPI) thresholds to achieve reliable and high-speed data connections. The LTE Subsystem also includes one Evolved Packet Core (EPC) implementation at the Los Angeles County Fire Department’s Fire Command and Control Facility (FCCF) to manage user mobility and routing throughout the entire system. A second redundant Evolved Packet Core is included as an additive alternate. The following table represents the percentage for each zone for the downlink (cell site to mobile device) and uplink (mobile device to cell site).

LA-RICS Coverage Zones Percentage Coverage of Geography Downlink (768 kbps) Uplink (256 kbps)
LA Basin 96.5 91.7
Santa Monica Mtns. 62.6 36.2
Angeles National Forest 35.0 11.6
Foothills 70.4 43.2
Foothills – Developed 91.2 76.8
CA-14 Corridor 42.2 16.9
Northern Desert 90.9 73.7
Waterway 70.8 66.0
Backhaul Subsystem – The Backhaul Subsystem provides connectivity and data routing among the 231 cell sites and the Evolved Packet Core. Microwave communication is the method of choice in the Backhaul Subsystem and provides connections for more than 80% of the PSBN APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 10
sites. The remaining sites as well as other intersystem connections are achieved through leased circuits.

Ancillary Site Subsystem – The Ancillary Site Subsystem consists of “public safety grade” elements required to support the LTE and Backhaul subsystems. This subsystem includes new robust monopole “towers” as well as battery backup and generator systems to provide shortterm and long-term power backup in the event of commercial power failures. The Ancillary Site Subsystem also includes the necessary upgrades and improvements for existing rooftop and tower sites to support the LTE and Backhaul equipment.

System Capabilities & Advantages System Capabilities & Advantages The PSBN is capable of high-speed and high-mobility communication where service is provided.

Data rates and performance on the system will be comparable to commercial cellular services.

However, this network differs from commercial services in one key area—availability of service.

Commercial cellular networks are not built to the same robust standard as the PSBN and are not expected to be as survivable. Furthermore, commercial usage by consumers is typically very high during emergencies. This creates congestion on the cell sites where the incident occurs. And due to lack of priority service on the commercial networks, public safety communication is at risk due to the congestion.

The PSBN provides outdoor service to portable handheld devices over the area in the table above at data speeds at or above 768 kilobits per second (kbps) in the downlink and 256 kbps in the uplink. However, these rates represent the “edge” rates where the signal is low. LTE is capable of scaling to lower rates at lower signal levels, and therefore, the PSBN can cover more area at lower rates. This can include limited coverage inside buildings, especially inside buildings near PSBN cell sites. Typical capacity for a single cell site is expected to be on the order of 30 megabits per second (mbps). This capacity is shared by the users in that area.

The PSBN is designed to be “public safety grade.” The towers are more robust than typical cell phone towers, the sites are equipped with multiple forms of power backup, and wherever possible, components and connections are redundant such that when one element fails, another is immediately available to maintain system operation.

The PSBN is capable of transporting any Internet Protocol (IP) application data. This includes Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), voice over IP (VoIP), electronic Patient Care Records (ePCR), web applications, e-mail, streaming video, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and many others. It is designed to accommodate very low system delays (latency) to provide high quality services to delay sensitive applications. However, the system’s designed capacity is limited, and therefore, the degree to which these applications can be run simultaneously on the same cell site is limited. In addition, the system may not provide the needed coverage (e.g., in-building) required by some of these applications.

The system is also capable of roaming to commercial cellular networks where PSBN service does not exist. Therefore, outside of Los Angeles County, in areas outside of the PSBN coverage APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 11
footprint, and inside buildings, the system is capable of supporting a transition (with a short delay during the transition) to the commercial network. Additionally, subscriber device options (including one from Motorola in the base agreement) will support the use of multiple modems that can seamlessly transition between the commercial and PSBN networks.

Effects on Members’ Effects on Members’Existing Operations & Benefits Existing Operations & Benefits Existing Operations & Benefits Due to the higher availability of the PSBN from the robustness of the network to the dedicated capacity, public safety users will be able to rely more on the PSBN in emergencies. This will enable public safety personnel to have sustained communications in life-threatening scenarios that may normally be constrained by congestion or a complete loss of service. For example, in the event of an earthquake, existing systems may be crippled by the event itself or by the extremely high usage levels. The PSBN is expected to be more survivable in such an event, and the dedicated capacity means public safety does not have to compete with the public for data resources. Finally, because the PSBN is fully controlled by public safety, the Authority and its Members can adjust network priorities to address congestion within the public safety community to ensure the most critical communication gets through.

In some cases, Member agencies may withhold deployment of data solutions because of the reliability or capabilities of existing systems. The higher reliability of the PSBN may enable increased use of broadband data applications in “mission-critical” scenarios. Therefore, in addition to higher reliability of existing data solutions, new life-saving benefits may now be possible over the PSBN as a result of the higher data availability. For example, due to congestion on commercial networks, real-time streaming video use may be limited. The PSBN has all of the advanced capabilities of an LTE network and can prioritize video traffic to ensure the needed resources are made available.

Because the PSBN is under the control of public safety, public safety determines the priority of response to system failures when they occur. This includes public safety control of emergency deployable systems, such as a “Cell on Wheels (COW).” It also includes public safety determination of system maintenance timing to ensure that potential outages that result from maintenance minimize their impacts on public safety, not consumer, operations. It also means that restoration of service can be prioritized due to public safety, not commercial, needs.

The PSBN includes a robust backhaul network connecting the PSBN cell sites with the core network “switch.” These sites are predominantly located at police and fire stations. The connections could then be used to provide robust data connections to these facilities. To the extent that these facilities are on member agency networks, they may enable connectivity among Public Safety Access Points or other data communication within the region. While the PSBN connection is currently planned to end at the tower outside these police and fire stations, a connection to the inside of the co-located facility can complete the circuit. This could enable direct phone calling between Member agencies in the event that the public telephone network fails, among other applications. It should be noted that the capacity of these connections is based only on the PSBN traffic, and therefore, connections may require upgrades to support new APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 12
applications. However, the system is planned for 50% growth, which could be used for limited external applications.

In order to benefit from the PSBN’s capabilities, Member agencies will need new Band Class 14 devices. While Member agencies may have LTE-capable devices from commercial carriers, those devices do not currently support the dedicated public safety spectrum. Those new devices will need to be configured and installed. Additionally, Member agencies will need to connect their fixed networks, data centers, and applications to the PSBN. This will require coordination and collaboration between IT departments to including physical connectivity, data routing, and security.

Funding Funding Funding
LA-RICS will include voice (land mobile radio, or LMR) and broadband data (long-term evolution, or LTE) components. LA-RICS will provide day-to-day communications within agencies and allow seamless interagency communications for responding to routine, emergency, and catastrophic events. Although a significant portion of system costs will be covered through grant funding, the Authority must identify a method to distribute its remaining cost among its members. LA-RICS established a Finance Committee to address these issues, among other financial considerations, and subsequently retained Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) to develop a methodology and ultimately this Funding Plan.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 13
Section 1. Funding Plan Overview
Requirements
The LA-RICS Joint Powers Agreement Section 2.05(b)(2) notes that it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to “develop and implement a funding plan (the ‘Funding Plan’) for the construction and ongoing operation of a shared voice and data system.” Section 5.01 (Adoption of Funding Plan) provides additional clarity for this responsibility:

It is a critical goal of the Authority to develop a Funding Plan that identifies funding sources and mechanisms, including a development schedule and phasing plan, which will permit the maximum feasible participation by Members. The Funding Plan shall be descriptive as to the contributions required from Members.

Prior to committing resources for the construction of the System, a proposed Funding Plan as designated in Section 2.05(b)(2) shall be developed.

Section 5.01 of the Agreement also requires that the Funding Plan “shall be accompanied by a description of the System, and reports and studies to allow Members to determine the System capability, cost, financing and the effects on individual Members.” This Funding Plan meets those requirements. This Funding Plan identifies funding sources and mechanisms to pay for construction of LA-RICS through grant funds and contributions by Members, respectively, as discussed herein. In addition, the LMR and PSBN Agreements executed between Motorola and the Authority set forth a detailed development and phasing schedule for the construction, operation, and maintenance of each system. Much of the background information and stakeholder engagement process is contained in Appendix 1 – Draft Funding Plan.

On March 6, 2014, the Authority Board considered the Draft Funding Plan and authorized its release for the required 60-day comment period. On April 3, 2014, the Authority Board reviewed and considered information pertaining to the specific Cash Flow contained in the Draft Funding Plan, which contemplated deferring the Capital Replacement Reserve for the LMR System, with no accumulation, until the beginning of the fourth year of system operation. An administrative cost allocation for the ongoing support of Authority Operations at 20% of the overall administrative cost was also included in the revision. The Authority Board authorized the release of this revision, which is included in Appendix 2.

On May 7, 2014, the Authority Board received a report outlining all of the comments received on the Draft Funding Plan. This information is included in Appendix 3.

Included in Appendix 4 is the August 15, 2013, LMR Board letter and the March 6, 2014, LTE Board letter that discusses the phasing of work to occur to construct, operate, and maintain each system.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 14
Funding Plan Components and Goals
LA-RICS has received favorable status through receipt of significant grant funding for the LMR and LTE systems. These grant funds cover a substantial portion of the costs associated with constructing the physical infrastructure that supports both systems. The Funding Plan is responsible for proposing an allocation of the costs not covered by the grant funding including LMR operations and maintenance, LMR life-cycle capital replacement, LTE hard cost matches, LTE soft cost matches, LTE operations and maintenance, and LTE life-cycle capital replacement (Section 4 provides more detail about Funding Plan costs).

The methodology for the distribution of system costs between Member agencies and their acceptance is a major challenge to the successful completion of the LA-RICS project. The Draft Funding Plan utilized a number of variables to allocate costs for both the LTE and LMR systems.

This information is contained in Appendix 1. In consideration of the feedback received during the comment period, it is being recommended that the variables used to allocate cost to Member agencies be revised to eliminate as many unknowns as possible including the potential that agencies may have reported information inconsistently.

The Board has met its obligation to distribute a Draft Funding Plan to Members with a description of the LMR and LTE systems, as well as “reports and studies” that would allow members to make their own assessments of system capabilities, costs, financing, and fiscal impact. In addition, Members can continue to meet with Authority staff and the LA-RICS contractor to discuss and evaluate the particulars of each system and the associated projected coverages in any geographic area affecting Members.

Once the Board adopts a Funding Plan, the Board will need to notify Members within five days of adopting the Funding Plan. Members then have at least 35 days in which to submit written notice of immediate withdrawal from the Authority. Very significantly, “there will be no costs for any Member that withdraws from the Authority within this time period” (Art. V, Sec. 5.01). The Authority Board voted to extend the opt-out period for the plan to 180 days to allow Member agencies to adequately review the information and allow their governing bodies to take appropriate action, if necessary.

The Authority's Board may opt to revise the Funding Plan in light of Member withdrawals following its adoption. The provision in the Agreement (last paragraph of Art. V, Sec. 5.01) that allows for a Board vote on a revised Funding Plan states:

After the Funding Plan has been adopted, and until contracts are awarded to design and/or construct the System, if the Funding Plan is revised in a manner which will substantially increase the financial obligations of the members, then any Member so affected will have a further right to withdraw within a period designated by the Board, which shall not be less than 45 days after the adoption of the revised Funding Plan. There will be no costs or any Member that withdraws from the Authority within this time period, except for obligations incurred prior to the adoption of the Revised Funding Plan.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 15
Section 2. Background Research
Extensive background research was done of comparable interoperable communication systems to identify existing finance plan strategies. Select allocation methods and variables from these comparable systems, as vetted by Members, were incorporated in the Draft Funding Plan authorized for release on March 6, 2014. All of the background research is contained in the Draft Funding Plan attached in Appendix 1.

Section 3. Member Outreach
Extensive Member outreach was done by Authority staff and PMC. All of the Member outreach and results of this outreach are contained in the Draft Funding Plan attached in Appendix 1. PMC sent initial surveys to fire and police chiefs, as well as city managers, of each Member agency, followed with three rounds of stakeholder meetings held between November 2013 and January 2014. Each series included hosting several meetings on different days and in separate locations with the intention of increasing Member participation.

Section 4. Cost Allocation Method
Cost allocation, or apportionment, is the manner by which the various costs of the systems are assigned to defined user characteristics and then allocated to the LA-RICS Members based on each Member’s known user data. The apportionment methodology considers the components of the system costs to the extent that they are known or can be estimated.

The objective of this section is to (1) outline in a representational model the system funding preferences based on input from stakeholders and comments received during the comment period; (2) describe the funding model parameters and development; and (3) develop costs for each Member using the cost allocation formula for the LMR and LTE systems.

Cost Components of Systems
The costs and model development assume full buildout and implementation of the interoperable communications systems as defined in the executed agreements for LMR and LTE. Costs based on assumptions of phased buildout and implementation will result in different costs in the early years of the system. Any phasing assumptions and changes in costs for system development will be determined by the Authority. The Funding Plan relies on grant monies for the initial construction of the LMR and LTE systems. Member fees are to be the revenue source for operation of both systems, administrative costs, LTE hard match, and LMR System refresh. Voter assessments are not currently practical given the high cost of a ballot campaign coupled with high voter requirements to pass a special revenue measure.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 16
Land Mobile Radio (LMR)
Components of LMR cost include the contract system maintenance costs (Phase 5) totaling approximately $56 million for the full 15-year contract period.1 In addition to the contracted system maintenance cost, an infrastructure component is included to account for replacement and technological upgrade and/or obsolescence. This infrastructure component, or capital replacement, is called the “Life Cycle Cost.” A Life Cycle Cost estimate for replacement of LMR infrastructure is approximately $55 million as determined by the LA-RICS engineering consultant.

Payments by Members for capital replacement cost are spread evenly over a 15-year period. An amount for Authority administration costs of LMR is also estimated.

Long-Term Evolution (LTE)
The estimated costs for LTE shown are from the Broadband Technology Opportunity Program (BTOP) grant Budget Narrative dated November 25, 2013, as well as Authority estimates. The itemized cost components are as follows:

1. System operations and maintenance: $28.6 million (first five years)

2. Total matching funds (cash) for LTE construction grant (hard match): $19.5 million Per Authority direction, in-kind matching funds as well as LTE System refresh costs will be fulfilled through means other than contributions by all Members.

The Funding Plan comprises fees that are calculated by LA-RICS Member for both the LMR and LTE systems, as well as for JPA operations. Administrative costs for LA-RICS are divided into three areas, one being JPA operational cost, the second for LMR administration, and the third for LTE administration. Costs for JPA operations are for categories such as Authority staffing, administrative facility lease, and insurance. LMR and LTE administration costs are specifically for the management and implementation of each system including contract management, grant administration, and other tasks to maintain system operations. The total administrative costs are allocated in the following amounts: 40% for JPA operations; 30% for LMR; and 30% for LTE.

Within LMR, the fee estimate reflects three costs (operations, system refresh, and administrative). Within LTE, the fee estimate also reflects three costs (operations, annualized grant hard match, and administrative). The following average annual cost estimates for LMR and LTE are assumed for calculating annual member fees.

1 Exhibit C.6 – Schedule of Payments LMR System Maintenance – LA-RICS LMR Agreement with Motorola. The payments vary from year to year, beginning at $4 million in year 1 and reducing to $3.6 million by year 15.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 17
System Cost Component Cost Component Cost Component Annual Cost Annual CostAnnual Cost Annual Cost Total LMR
Operations $3,726,600
System Refresh $4,806,800 $9,308,400
Administrative $775,000
LTE
Hard Match $1,875,000
Operations $6,473,900 $9,123,900
Administrative $775,000
JPA Operations $1,033,000 $1,033,000
Work by LA-RICS and its committees determined that a preferred LTE scenario be developed that excludes the in-kind match and system refresh, and adds maintenance for the Home Subscriber Server (HSS) and Redundant Evolved Packet Core.

FIRST NET OPTIONS
In February 2012, Congress enacted the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, containing landmark provisions to create a much-needed nationwide interoperable broadband network that will help police, firefighters, emergency medical service professionals, and other public safety officials stay safe and do their jobs. The law’s governing framework for the deployment and operation of this network, which is to be based on a single national network architecture, is the new “First Responder Network Authority” (FirstNet), an independent authority in the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), located within the Department of Commerce. FirstNet will hold the spectrum license for the network and is charged with taking “all actions necessary” to build, deploy, and operate the network, in consultation with federal, state, tribal, and local public safety entities and with other key stakeholders.

The act provides $7 billion in funding toward deployment of this network, as well as $135 million for a new State and Local Implementation Grant Program administered by the NTIA to support state, regional, tribal, and local jurisdictions’ efforts to plan and work with FirstNet to ensure the network meets their wireless public safety communications needs.

LA-RICS staff has been holding discussions with FirstNet to help offset costs, which could lead to cost savings to LA-RICS Members. These costs include capital infrastructure replacement, Core Maintenance (PSBN Hardware & Software EPC and NMS), and eNodeB Maintenance (PSBN Hardware & Software RAN). To date, FirstNet has not been able to provide any affirmative commitment to providing resources to the Authority.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 18

THE FUNDING PLAN DOES NOT APPLY TO SUBSCRIBER UNITS
Under the Funding Plan, Members would still be responsible for their LMR or LTE subscriber units. For the LMR System, Members would be responsible for the costs of buying, maintaining, operating, and replacing the following:
• Portable radios
• Mobile radios
• Base stations
• Dispatch consoles
For the LTE System, Members would be responsible for the costs of buying, maintaining, operating, and replacing the following:
• High-speed data units
LA-RICS may be able to help Members secure grant funding for radio or broadband subscriber units. LA-RICS may also be able to help Members pool their unit purchases so as to command lower pricing. But notwithstanding these forms of assistance, LA-RICS does not assume cost responsibility for subscriber units, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority's Board.

THE FUNDING PLAN DOES APPLY TO STANDARD LMR AND LTE BACKBONES As stated earlier, the purpose of the Funding Plan is to fund the backbone LMR and LTE systems necessary to meet a service standard under normal conditions.

Major elements of the LMR backbone include:
• Radio towers
• Microwave links
• Fiber optic links
• Radio antennas
• Control buildings and radio communications equipment
• Ancillary equipment
Major elements of the LTE backbone include:
• Monopole towers
• Microwave links
• Fiber optic links
• Broadband antennas
• Control buildings and broadband communications equipment • Ancillary equipment
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 19
Cost Apportionment
The preferred option for apportioning costs to the Members is based on the following method and assumptions:
• Joint Powers Authority Administration: Distribution of 40% of Authority staff and operating costs based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50% (effective FY 2014/2015). • LMR System Operating Costs:
- No costs will be allocated or collected for the LMR System from Members until such time as the system is operational (projected FY 2017/18), unless the Authority Board adopts a revised Funding Plan, including to account for any loss or shortage of grant funds.
- Additionally, the Authority’s Board will issue an amendment to the Funding Plan to reflect projected operational and maintenance costs prior to the operation of the LMR System.
- The cost of operation during the first year of operation (projected FY 2017/18) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
- The cost of operation during the second and third years of operation (projected FY 2018/19) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs and full cost of LMR System maintenance based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
- The cost of operation during the fourth and subsequent years of operation (projected FY 2020/21) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LMR System operational costs and full cost of LMR System maintenance based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
b. LMR System refresh based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. • LTE System Operating Costs:

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 20
- The cost of operation during the first year of operation (FY 2015/16) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE System operational costs and fiber connectivity operational costs, if applicable, based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.
b. Hard match contribution based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. - The cost of operation during the second and subsequent years of operation (effective FY 2016/17) is based on:
a. Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE System operational costs and full cost of LTE System maintenance (including leased fiber connectivity, if applicable) based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. b. Hard match contribution based on Authority Members’ proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. - Cost of operation during years following the extinguishment of commercial financing will continue as reflected above, with the exception of hard match contributions.

Cost Variables
The costs for constructing, operating, and maintaining the LMR and LTE systems are established in the agreements with the systems’ provider. This Funding Plan, for purposes of establishing a set of cost parameters to conduct the cost allocation, assumes that all costs are fixed—at least through the contract periods of the agreements. It should be noted that the variables discussed in the Funding Plan may not have been key factors used by the contract vendor in determining the established total systems costs. The LMR and LTE systems are very complex and, in order to assemble their cost proposal, the contract vendor would have had to consider many more factors than the variables presented below.

The LMR System is not anticipated to “go live” until FY 2017/18. Consideration of LMR System Operating Costs will be the subject of a revision to the Funding Plan released prior to the activation of the system. This is in consideration of:
a. Execution of the LMR contract is by phase, with each phase requiring approval of a Notice to Proceed by the Authority Board of Directors.
b. Sufficient funding for each phase must be demonstrated to the Authority Board of Directors before such consideration.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 21
i. Individual Notices to Proceed may be authorized by the Board of Directors on a siteby-site basis, depending on funding availability. ii. Any decrease or suspension in grant funding that might subject Authority Members to an increased substantial financial liability should be evaluated by the Board to determine whether a revised Funding Plan should be adopted, and if one is adopted, will trigger an additional 45-day opt-out period. iii. The LMR contract provides for termination for non-appropriation of funds, thus further protecting Authority Members from further liabilities being incurred that cannot be addressed via revision to the Funding Plan.
c. The detailed design of the LMR System is currently in progress. i. The inability to achieve maximum benefit from some of the designated sites is resulting in site substitution and/or additions. This may result in an adjustment of maintenance and operating costs.
ii. Changes in LMR technology during the design phase that warrant reconfiguration of operational aspects may result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.
iii. An updated analysis of projected maintenance and operating costs may also result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.

Given the complexity of the cost proposals, the Funding Plan measures each Member’s share of the communications systems cost based on population and geography (LMR and LTE) and apportions the costs accordingly. These variables are described in Table 1 Table 1 Table 1 Table 1 below to show how they potentially would be used to determine a Member’s share of infrastructure capital replacement and operations costs.

Table 1. Variables for LMR and LTE Cost Allocation Formulas System/ System/ System/
VariableVariable Variable
DescriptionDescription Description Measure of Cost
Variable Variable Variable
Applied to Applied to pplied to pplied to
Capital CostCapital Cost Capital Cost
Variable Variable Variable
Applied to Applied to pplied to pplied to
O&M CostO&M Cost O&M Cost
Jurisdiction
residential
population
A jurisdiction’s current
resident population, For
Cities of Industry and
Vernon, daytime resident
plus worker population is
used.

Measures the size of population as
a predictor of system use; in
general, the greater the
population, the greater the impact
to the system.

X X
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 22
System/ System/ System/
VariableVariable Variable
DescriptionDescription Description Measure of Cost
Variable Variable Variable
Applied to Applied to pplied to pplied to
Capital CostCapital Cost Capital Cost
Variable Variable Variable
Applied to Applied to pplied to pplied to
O&M CostO&M Cost O&M Cost
Geography
Each jurisdiction’s municipal
boundary expressed in
square mileage. The square
mileage excludes national
forest lands.

Measures the size of each
Member’s physical land area as a
predictor of system use; in
general, the greater the land area,
the greater the impact to the
system.

X X
Variables Data Sources
The variables used in the cost allocation formulas for LMR and LTE are based on information provided through several data sources. Population data was obtained from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Local Profile Reports. Daytime resident plus worker population for the Cities of Industry and Vernon were obtained from the American Community Survey’s Commuter-Adjusted Daytime Population: Places. Geographic land area, expressed in square miles, was obtained from Los Angeles County Department of Public Works through the Los Angeles County GIS Data Portal and excludes national forest land.

Cost Formula
Figure 1 Figure 1 illustrates how the cost allocation method for a given Member would be calculated.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 23
Figure 1. Cost Allocation Formula
Cost Allocation Formula Distributed by 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Administrative Cost Cost Formula

MemberLMR Cost LMR CostLMR Cost LMR Cost

Member LTE Cost Member LTE CostLTE Cost LTE Cost(Operations plus Hard Match) (Operations plus Hard Match) (Operations plus Hard Match)

Member Baseline Administrative Cost Member Baseline Administrative Cost

* LMR and LTE populations and square miles are adjusted to reflect a member’s contractual status with the County. =
Member
Hard Match Hard Match Hard Match
Cost
X LTE Hard LTE Hard LTE Hard
Match
=
Member
Baseline Baseline Baseline
Admin CostAdmin Cost Admin Cost Admin Cost
X JPA Operations JPA Operations
Member LMR Member LMR
Cost
Member LTE Member LTE
Cost
(Operations plus (Operations plus
Hard MatchHard Match Hard Match)
Member
Baseline Baseline Baseline
Administrative
Cost
Total Member
+Cost

+ =
Member
PopulationPopulation Population* Population*
Total Population Total Population Population Population of LA-RICS
Members Members
=
Member LMR
Operations Cost
Member
Square Miles* Square Miles*
Total Square Miles Total Square Miles
of LA-RICS
Members Members
+ X 50% X
LMR
Operations Operations Operations
Cost
=
Member LTE Member LTE
Operations Operations Operations
Cost
X LTE Operations
Cost
X 50%
Member
PopulationPopulation Population* Population*
Total Population Total Population Population Population of LA-RICS
Members Members
Member
Square Miles* Square Miles*
Total Square Miles Total Square Miles
of LA-RICS
Members Members
+ X 50% X 50%
Member
PopulationPopulation Population* Population*
Total Population Total Population Population Population of LA-RICS
Members Members
Member
Square Miles* Square Miles*
Total Square Miles Total Square Miles
of LA-RICS
Members Members
+ X 50% X 50%
Member
PopulationPopulation Population Population
Total Population Total Population Population Population of LA-RICS
Members Members
Member
Square Miles Square Miles
Total Square Miles Total Square Miles
of LA-RICS
Members Members
+ X 50% X 50%
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 24
Annual fee estimates by Member agency were developed for the LA-RICS LMR and LTE systems using the cost allocation process described above. Fee estimates are shown for LA-RICS members with their own independent police and/or fire services. Estimated fees for full contract cities are not calculated, as fees for full contract cities will be determined by each Member’s contract terms with Los Angeles County. Full contract cities are as follows:
•City of Agoura Hills •City of Industry •City of Paramount •City of Artesia •City of La Cañada Flintridge •City of Pico Rivera •City of Bellflower •City of La Mirada •City of Rancho Palos Verdes •City of Bradbury •City of La Puente •City of Rolling Hills Estates •City of Calabasas •City of Lakewood •City of Rosemead
•City of Carson •City of Lancaster •City of San Dimas
•City of Cerritos •City of Lawndale •City of Santa Clarita •City of Commerce •City of Lynwood •City of South El Monte •City of Duarte •City of Maywood •City of Temple City
•City of Hawaiian Gardens •City of Norwalk •City of Walnut •City of Hidden Hills •City of Palmdale •City of Westlake Village For cities that receive service from the County for one service, either law enforcement or fire, the cost allocation formula accounts for one half (50%) of that city’s population and geography to be attributed to the County or County Fire District, and the other half (50%) that remains with the city. This division provides a means to allocate costs where one service is provided by the County while the other service is provided directly by the city.

Mutual Aid Agreement Affiliates
Agencies that have formal mutual aid agreements with Authority Members may receive limited authorization to utilize the LA-RICS network as a result of the mutual aid agreement. Access to the LA-RICS system will be limited to those communications essential to and within the scope of such mutual aid operations.

Cash Flow
The LA-RICS Funding Plan provides a projection of cash flow of project expenses based on construction milestones and system operability, and the impact on Members’ fees. Member fees are spread among each LA-RICS members as well as seven additional cities that are not members of LA-RICS but receive law enforcement and/or fire services from the County. These cities include City of Cudahy, City of Diamond Bar, City of La Habra, City of Lomita, City of Malibu, City of Rolling Hills, and City of West Hollywood. The cash flow required for the LMR System backbone is developed for the time period of FY 2017/18 through FY 2031/32, a 15-year period.

The cash flow required for the LTE System backbone is developed separately for the time period APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
LA-RICS Funding Plan
LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 25
of FY 2015/16 through FY 2031/32, a 17-year period to match the end years with LMR. Cash flow is also provided separately for JPA operations as well as the LTE hard match. The cost allocation using the cash flow assumes participation by all JPA Members from system implementation.

Section 5. Data Monitoring and True-Up Period
The cost model, at least during the initial term, places an emphasis on population and geographical area data gathered from SCAG and the Census Bureau. At a future date, it may be necessary to revise these variables to align with actual use on the system. Since the system is not currently functioning, this information is not available. However, the Authority Board identified a need to establish a three-year period where the original assumptions and cost allocation formula would be revisited and if necessary revised to incorporate actual use data from the LARICS system in operation. If the variables for the model are changed, the new variables can be updated on a regular basis with data from the LTE and LMR systems that measures each agency’s usage. It is anticipated that if this occurs, the variables used would be the number of radios on the system (LMR) and the number of data units on the system (LTE).

For this regular reporting process, a means to validate data submitted to the Authority Board could be conducted by an independent third party. The validation could include tracing the process by which the data is collected and reported by the jurisdiction and/or LA-RICS, reviewing internal and external reports generated by the jurisdiction, conducting field visits, and developing historic trends in the reported data. The validation should occur in regular intervals such as annually or biannually and implemented through various techniques including random validations and/or geographic-focused verification.

The data monitoring process would be applied to information generated by the Member agencies as well as by the LA-RICS communications provider should the provider have capability to track the variable data. A report of the findings would be developed for the LA-RICS Board by the independent third-party reviewer. An ongoing program of data verification is required as an assurance to all participants and the Authority that the cost shares are apportioned using representative data for each participating agency.

APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash Flow
June 2014
Population
Adjusted
Population
Geography
(Sq. Mi.)
Adjusted
Geography
(Sq. Mi.)
City of Agoura Hills 20,413 0 7.82 0.00
City of Alhambra 83,661 83,661 7.63 7.63
City of Arcadia 56,546 56,546 11.11 11.11
City of Artesia 16,594 0 1.62 0.00
City of Avalon 3,780 3,780 2.89 2.89
City of Azusa 46,618 23,309 9.54 4.77
City of Baldwin Park 75,830 37,915 6.78 3.39
City of Bell 35,477 17,739 2.62 1.31
City of Bell Gardens 42,231 21,116 2.47 1.23
City of Bellflower 76,907 0 6.18 0.00
City of Beverly Hills 34,291 34,291 5.71 5.71
City of Bradbury 1,065 0 1.96 0.00
City of Burbank 104,427 104,427 17.34 17.34
City of Calabasas 23,683 0 13.76 0.00
City of Carson 91,828 0 18.94 0.00
City of Cerritos 49,223 0 8.85 0.00
City of Claremont 35,300 17,650 13.47 6.73
City of Commerce 12,871 0 6.55 0.00
City of Compton 97,058 48,529 10.10 5.05
City of Covina 48,038 24,019 7.04 3.52
City of Culver City 39,004 39,004 5.13 5.13
City of Downey 112,201 112,201 12.57 12.57
City of Duarte 21,411 0 3.70 0.00
City of El Monte 113,912 56,956 9.61 4.81
City of El Segundo 16,720 16,720 5.44 5.44
City of Gardena 59,124 59,124 5.86 5.86
City of Glendale 192,654 192,654 29.55 29.55
City of Glendora 50,361 25,181 14.67 7.33
City of Hawaiian Gardens 14,303 0 0.96 0.00
City of Hawthorne 85,047 42,524 6.08 3.04
City of Hermosa Beach 19,574 19,574 1.45 1.45
City of Hidden Hills 1,869 0 1.69 0.00
City of Huntington Park 58,329 29,165 3.01 1.51
City of Industry 38,453 0 12.04 0.00
City of Inglewood 110,623 55,312 9.10 4.55
City of Irwindale 1,416 708 9.63 4.82
City of La Canada Flintridge 20,335 0 8.26 0.00
City of La Habra Heights 5,352 2,676 6.16 3.08
City of La Mirada 48,697 0 7.85 0.00
City of La Puente 39,987 0 3.47 0.00
City of La Verne 31,461 31,461 7.90 7.90
City of Lakewood 80,378 0 9.45 0.00
City of Lancaster 157,826 0 94.51 0.00
City of Lawndale 32,887 0 1.97 0.00
City of Long Beach 464,662 464,662 51.67 51.67
City of Los Angeles 3,825,297 3,837,173 467.19 468.37
City of Lynwood 69,897 0 4.84 0.00
City of Manhattan Beach 35,239 35,239 3.92 3.92
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash Flow
June 2014
Population
Adjusted
Population
Geography
(Sq. Mi.)
Adjusted
Geography
(Sq. Mi.)
City of Maywood 27,472 0 1.18 0.00
City of Monrovia 36,727 36,727 8.17 8.17
City of Montebello 62,857 62,857 8.37 8.37
City of Monterey Park 61,153 61,153 7.74 7.74
City of Norwalk 105,714 0 9.76 0.00
City of Palmdale 153,708 0 106.25 0.00
City of Palos Verdes Estates 13,516 6,758 4.77 2.39
City of Paramount 54,368 0 4.82 0.00
City of Pasadena 139,222 139,222 22.06 22.06
City of Pico Rivera 63,168 0 8.91 0.00
City of Pomona 149,950 74,975 22.97 11.49
City of Ranchos Palos Verdes 41,897 0 13.48 0.00
City of Redondo Beach 67,007 67,007 6.21 6.21
City of Rolling Hills Estates 8,097 0 3.60 0.00
City of Rosemead 54,172 0 5.17 0.00
City of San Dimas 33,499 0 13.51 0.00
City of San Fernando 23,752 11,876 2.37 1.19
City of San Gabriel 39,926 39,926 4.13 4.13
City of San Marino 13,195 13,195 3.77 3.77
City of Santa Clarita 177,445 0 61.20 0.00
City of Santa Fe Springs 16,516 8,258 8.88 4.44
City of Santa Monica 90,223 90,223 8.51 8.51
City of Sierra Madre 10,963 10,963 2.96 2.96
City of Signal Hill 11,129 5,565 2.20 1.10
City of South El Monte 20,190 0 2.85 0.00
City of South Gate 94,328 47,164 7.35 3.68
City of South Pasadena 25,725 25,725 3.41 3.41
City of Temple City 35,749 0 4.03 0.00
City of Torrance 146,115 146,115 20.56 20.56
City of Vernon 33,618 33,618 5.15 5.15
City of Walnut 29,661 0 8.98 0.00
City of West Covina 106,713 106,713 16.07 16.07
City of Westlake Village 8,300 0 5.50 0.00
City of Whittier 85,654 42,827 14.66 7.33
County of Los Angeles 1,062,073 3,477,876 1,569.36 2,164.89 Inglewood Unified School District 9,375 4,688 0.06 0.03 Los Angeles Unified School District 480,000 480,000 5.35 5.35 UCLA 31,622 31,622 0.65 0.65

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of Cudahy 25,879 0 1.23 0.00
City of Diamond Bar 60,360 0 14.88 0.00
City of La Habra 30,181 0 3.69 0.00
City of Lomita 21,056 0 1.92 0.00
City of Malibu 13,700 0 19.69 0.00
City of Rolling Hills 1,967 0 2.99 0.00
City of West Hollywood 37,563 0 1.90 0.00
Total 10,518,36510,518,365 10,518,365 10,518,36510,518,365 10,518,365 3,011 3,011 APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
FY 2014/2015
JPA Operations JPA Operations LMR LTE Total
$ 2,300 $ 2,346 $ - $ - $2,346$ 5,326 $ 5,432 $ - $ 13,896 $19,328 $ 4,599 $ 4,691 $ - $ 12,011 $16,702$ 1,074 $ 1,096 $ - $ - $1,096 $ 667 $ 681 $ - $ 1,746 $2,427
$ 3,856 $ 3,933 $ - $ 5,035 $8,969$ 4,803 $ 4,900 $ - $ 6,267 $11,166 $ 2,155 $ 2,198 $ - $ 2,811 $5,009
$ 2,455 $ 2,504 $ - $ 3,202 $5,707$ 4,756 $ 4,851 $ - $ - $4,851 $ 2,617 $ 2,669 $ - $ 6,833 $9,503
$ 381 $ 389 $ - $ - $389
$ 7,961 $ 8,120 $ - $ 20,785 $28,905
$ 3,456 $ 3,525 $ - $ - $3,525$ 7,620 $ 7,772 $ - $ - $7,772$ 3,866 $ 3,943 $ - $ - $3,943$ 3,969 $ 4,048 $ - $ 5,186 $9,235 $ 1,723 $ 1,757 $ - $ - $1,757
$ 6,388 $ 6,515 $ - $ 8,335 $14,850$ 3,505 $ 3,575 $ - $ 4,575 $8,150 $ 2,748 $ 2,803 $ - $ 7,172 $9,975$ 7,534 $ 7,685 $ - $ 19,663 $27,348$ 1,656 $ 1,689 $ - $ - $1,689 $ 7,121 $ 7,263 $ - $ 9,289 $16,553$ 1,722 $ 1,756 $ - $ 4,500 $6,256 $ 3,841 $ 3,918 $ - $ 10,024 $13,942
FY 2015/16
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 3,841 $ 3,918 $ - $ 10,024 $13,942
$ 14,561 14,275 $ - $ 37,268 $ $51,828$ 4,898 $ 4,996 $ - $ 6,398 $11,394 $ 852 $ 869 $ - $ - $869
$ 5,132 $ 5,235 $ - $ 6,694 $11,930$ 1,190 $ 1,214 $ - $ 3,105 $4,319 $ 374 $ 381 $ - $ - $381
$ 3,326 $ 3,392 $ - $ 4,337 $7,729
$ 2,043 $ 2,084 $ - $ - $2,084$ 6,875 $ 7,013 $ - $ 8,969 $15,982 $ 1,686 $ 1,720 $ - $ 2,208 $3,929
$ 2,370 $ 2,417 $ - $ - $2,417$ 1,293 $ 1,319 $ - $ 1,692 $3,011$ 3,672 $ 3,746 $ - $ - $3,746$ 2,516 $ 2,567 $ - $ - $2,567$ 2,848 $ 2,905 $ - $ 7,439 $10,343 $ 5,473 $ 5,582 $ - $ - $5,582
$ 23,502 $ 23,972 $ - $ - $23,972
$ 1,920 $ 1,959 $ - $ - $1,959
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
FY 2014/2015
JPA Operations JPA Operations LMR LTE Total
FY 2015/16
$ 31,761 31,138 $ - $ 81,263 $ $113,024$ 263,369 $ 268,637 $ - $ 689,411 $958,047 $ 4,192 $ 4,276 $ - $ - $4,276
$ 2,363 $ 2,410 $ - $ 6,166 $8,575$ 1,526 $ 1,556 $ - $ - $1,556$ 3,147 $ 3,210 $ - $ 8,220 $11,430 $ 4,444 $ 4,533 $ - $ 11,600 $16,133
$ 4,255 $ 4,341 $ - $ 11,107 $15,448$ 6,749 $ 6,884 $ - $ - $6,884 $ 25,275 $ 25,781 $ - $ - $25,781$ 1,455 $ 1,484 $ - $ 1,902 $3,386$ 3,438 $ 3,506 $ - $ - $3,506 $ 10,435 $ 10,644 $ - $ 27,244 $37,888
$ 4,549 $ 4,640 $ - $ - $4,640
$ 11,106 $ 11,329 $ - $ 14,498 $25,826
$ 4,289 $ 4,375 $ - $ - $4,375$ 4,282 $ 4,368 $ - $ 11,174 $15,542$ 995 $ 1,015 $ - $ - $1,015$ 3,487 $ 3,557 $ - $ - $3,557 $ 3,889 $ 3,966 $ - $ - $3,966$ 1,546 $ 1,577 $ - $ 2,018 $3,595$ 2,624 $ 2,677 $ - $ 6,848 $9,524$ 1,270 $ 1,296 $ - $ 3,319 $4,615 $ 18,856 $ 19,233 $ - $ - $19,233
$ 2,289 $ 2,335 $ - $ 2,993 $5,328
City of Santa Monica $ 5,790 $ 5,906 $ - $ 15,108 $21,013 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West HollywoodTotal $ 5,790 $ 5,906 $ - $ 15,108 $21,013
$ 1,047 1,027 $ $ - $ 2,682 $3,729
$ 907 $ 925 $ - $ 1,185 $2,110$ 1,455 $ 1,484 $ - $ - $1,484$ 5,794 $ 5,910 $ - $ 7,558 $13,469 $ 1,817 $ 1,853 $ - $ 4,743 $6,596
$ 2,404 $ 2,452 $ - $ - $2,452
$ 10,515 $ 10,726 $ - $ 27,449 $38,175
$ 871 $ 888 $ - $ 6,501 $7,390
$ 2,942 $ 3,001 $ - $ - $3,001$ 7,856 $ 8,014 $ - $ 20,510 $28,524$ 1,325 $ 1,352 $ - $ - $1,352$ 6,603 $ 6,735 $ - $ 8,620 $15,354 $ 314,932 $ 321,231 $ - $ 1,390,580 $1,711,811$ 463 $ 472 $ - $ 604 $1,076 $ 24,100 $ 24,582 $ - $ 62,816 $87,397$ 1,638 $ 1,671 $ - $ 4,271 $5,942$ 1,457 $ 1,487 $ - $ - $1,487$ 5,417 $ 5,525 $ - $ - $5,525$ 4,155 $ 4,239 $ - $ - $4,239$ 1,340 $ 1,367 $ - $ - $1,367$ 3,969 $ 4,049 $ - $ - $4,049$ 597 $ 609 $ - $ - $609 $ 2,135 $ 2,177 $ - $ - $2,177
$ 1,012,829 $ 1,033,086 $ - $ 2,649,827 $3,682,912
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,393 $ - $ - $2,393 $ 2,441 $ - $ - $2,441
$ 5,541 $ - $ 48,981 $54,522 $ 5,652 $ 4,227 $ 50,160 $60,039 $ 4,785 $ - $ 42,335 $47,120 $ 4,881 $ 3,654 $ 43,355 $51,889 $ 1,118 $ - $ - $1,118 $ 1,140 $ - $ - $1,140
$ 694 $ - $ 6,154 $6,849 $ 708 $ 531 $ 6,302 $7,542
$ 4,012 $ - $ 17,749 $21,761 $ 4,092 $ 1,532 $ 18,176 $23,800 $ 4,998 $ - $ 22,088 $27,086 $ 5,097 $ 1,906 $ 22,620 $29,624 $ 2,242 $ - $ 9,907 $12,149 $ 2,287 $ 855 $ 10,146 $13,288 $ 2,555 $ - $ 11,287 $13,841 $ 2,606 $ 974 $ 11,559 $15,138 $ 4,948 $ - $ - $4,948 $ 5,047 $ - $ - $5,047
$ 2,723 $ - $ 24,086 $26,809 $ 2,777 $ 2,079 $ 24,666 $29,522 $ 396 $ - $ - $396 $ 404 $ - $ - $404
$ 8,282 $ - $ 73,263 $81,545 $ 8,448 $ 6,323 $ 75,027 $89,798 $ 3,595 $ - $ - $3,595 $ 3,667 $ - $ - $3,667
$ 7,928 $ - $ - $7,928 $ 8,086 $ - $ - $8,086
$ 4,022 $ - $ - $4,022 $ 4,103 $ - $ - $4,103
$ 4,129 $ - $ 18,281 $22,410 $ 4,212 $ 1,578 $ 18,722 $24,511 $ 1,793 $ - $ - $1,793 $ 1,828 $ - $ - $1,828
$ 6,646 $ - $ 29,378 $36,024 $ 6,779 $ 2,535 $ 30,085 $39,399 $ 3,647 $ - $ 16,126 $19,773 $ 3,720 $ 1,392 $ 16,514 $21,626 $ 2,859 $ - $ 25,281 $28,140 $ 2,916 $ 2,182 $ 25,890 $30,988 $ 7,839 $ - $ 69,308 $77,147 $ 7,995 $ 5,982 $ 70,977 $84,954 $ 1,723 $ - $ - $1,723 $ 1,758 $ - $ - $1,758
$ 7,409 $ - $ 32,743 $40,152 $ 7,557 $ 2,826 $ 33,532 $43,914 $ 1,791 $ - $ 15,860 $17,651 $ 1,827 $ 1,369 $ 16,242 $19,438 $ 3,997 $ - $ 35,333 $39,329 $ 4,077 $ 3,049 $ 36,184 $43,310 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 3,997 $ - $ 35,333 $39,329 $ 4,077 $ 3,049 $ 36,184 $43,310 $ 14,852 $ - $ 131,362 $146,214 $ 15,149 $ 11,337 $ 134,525 $161,011 $ 5,096 $ - $ 22,553 $27,648 $ 5,197 $ 1,946 $ 23,096 $30,240 $ 886 $ - $ - $886 $ 904 $ - $ - $904
$ 5,340 $ - $ 23,597 $28,937 $ 5,447 $ 2,037 $ 24,165 $31,648 $ 1,238 $ - $ 10,946 $12,184 $ 1,263 $ 945 $ 11,209 $13,417 $ 389 $ - $ - $389 $ 397 $ - $ - $397
$ 3,460 $ - $ 15,286 $18,746 $ 3,529 $ 1,319 $ 15,654 $20,503 $ 2,126 $ - $ - $2,126 $ 2,169 $ - $ - $2,169$ 7,153 $ - $ 31,614 $38,767 $ 7,296 $ 2,728 $ 32,375 $42,400 $ 1,755 $ - $ 7,784 $9,539 $ 1,790 $ 672 $ 7,971 $10,433 $ 2,466 $ - $ - $2,466 $ 2,515 $ - $ - $2,515$ 1,346 $ - $ 5,964 $7,310 $ 1,372 $ 515 $ 6,108 $7,995 $ 3,820 $ - $ - $3,820 $ 3,897 $ - $ - $3,897$ 2,618 $ - $ - $2,618 $ 2,670 $ - $ - $2,670$ 2,963 $ - $ 26,221 $29,183 $ 3,022 $ 2,263 $ 26,852 $32,137 $ 5,694 $ - $ - $5,694 $ 5,808 $ - $ - $5,808
$ 24,452 $ - $ - $24,452 $ 24,941 $ - $ - $24,941
$ 1,998 $ - $ - $1,998 $ 2,038 $ - $ - $2,038
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18
$ 32,396 $ - $ 286,438 $318,834 $ 33,044 $ 24,721 $ 293,336 $351,101 $ 274,009 $ - $ 2,430,056 $2,704,065 $ 279,490 $ 209,729 $ 2,488,575 $2,977,794 $ 4,361 $ - $ - $4,361 $ 4,449 $ - $ - $4,449$ 2,458 $ - $ 21,733 $24,191 $ 2,507 $ 1,876 $ 22,256 $26,639 $ 1,587 $ - $ - $1,587 $ 1,619 $ - $ - $1,619$ 3,274 $ - $ 28,974 $32,248 $ 3,340 $ 2,501 $ 29,672 $35,512 $ 4,623 $ - $ 40,887 $45,511 $ 4,716 $ 3,529 $ 41,872 $50,117 $ 4,427 $ - $ 39,151 $43,578 $ 4,516 $ 3,379 $ 40,093 $47,988 $ 7,021 $ - $ - $7,021 $ 7,162 $ - $ - $7,162
$ 26,296 $ - $ - $26,296 $ 26,822 $ - $ - $26,822
$ 1,514 $ - $ 6,703 $8,217 $ 1,544 $ 579 $ 6,864 $8,987 $ 3,577 $ - $ - $3,577 $ 3,648 $ - $ - $3,648
$ 10,857 $ - $ 96,031 $106,888 $ 11,074 $ 8,288 $ 98,343 $117,705 $ 4,733 $ - $ - $4,733 $ 4,828 $ - $ - $4,828
$ 11,555 $ - $ 51,101 $62,657 $ 11,786 $ 4,410 $ 52,332 $68,529 $ 4,463 $ - $ - $4,463 $ 4,552 $ - $ - $4,552$ 4,455 $ - $ 39,386 $43,841 $ 4,544 $ 3,399 $ 40,334 $48,278 $ 1,036 $ - $ - $1,036 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $1,056$ 3,628 $ - $ - $3,628 $ 3,701 $ - $ - $3,701$ 4,046 $ - $ - $4,046 $ 4,127 $ - $ - $4,127$ 1,609 $ - $ 7,112 $8,721 $ 1,641 $ 614 $ 7,283 $9,538 $ 2,730 $ - $ 24,137 $26,867 $ 2,785 $ 2,083 $ 24,718 $29,586 $ 1,322 $ - $ 11,700 $13,022 $ 1,348 $ 1,010 $ 11,982 $14,340 $ 19,618 $ - $ - $19,618 $ 20,010 $ - $ - $20,010
$ 2,382 $ - $ 10,550 $12,931 $ 2,429 $ 910 $ 10,804 $14,143 City of Santa Monica $ 6,024 $ - $ 53,252 $59,276 $ 6,144 $ 4,596 $ 54,534 $65,275 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West HollywoodTotal $ 6,024 $ - $ 53,252 $59,276 $ 6,144 $ 4,596 $ 54,534 $65,275 $ - 1,068 $ 9,454 $ $10,522 $ 1,089 $ 816 $ 9,682 $11,587 $ 944 $ - $ 4,175 $5,119 $ 963 $ 360 $ 4,276 $5,599
$ 1,513 $ - $ - $1,513 $ 1,544 $ - $ - $1,544$ 6,028 $ - $ 26,642 $32,670 $ 6,149 $ 2,299 $ 27,283 $35,732 $ 1,890 $ - $ 16,718 $18,608 $ 1,928 $ 1,443 $ 17,120 $20,491 $ 2,501 $ - $ - $2,501 $ 2,551 $ - $ - $2,551
$ 10,940 $ - $ 96,755 $107,695 $ 11,159 $ 8,351 $ 99,085 $118,594 $ 906 $ - $ 22,915 $23,821 $ 924 $ 1,978 $ 23,467 $26,369 $ 3,061 $ - $ - $3,061 $ 3,122 $ - $ - $3,122$ 8,174 $ - $ 72,295 $80,469 $ 8,337 $ 6,239 $ 74,036 $88,613 $ 1,379 $ - $ - $1,379 $ 1,406 $ - $ - $1,406$ 6,869 $ - $ 30,383 $37,252 $ 7,007 $ 2,622 $ 31,115 $40,744 $ 327,655 $ - $ 4,901,560 $5,229,216 $ 334,208 $ 423,035 $ 5,019,597 $5,776,840 $ 482 $ - $ 2,128 $2,610 $ 492 $ 184 $ 2,179 $2,854
$ 25,073 $ - $ 221,414 $246,488 $ 25,575 $ 19,109 $ 226,746 $271,431 $ 1,705 $ - $ 15,055 $16,760 $ 1,739 $ 1,299 $ 15,418 $18,456 $ 1,516 $ - $ - $1,516 $ 1,547 $ - $ - $1,547$ 5,636 $ - $ - $5,636 $ 5,748 $ - $ - $5,748$ 4,323 $ - $ - $4,323 $ 4,410 $ - $ - $4,410$ 1,394 $ - $ - $1,394 $ 1,422 $ - $ - $1,422$ 4,130 $ - $ - $4,130 $ 4,212 $ - $ - $4,212 $ 621 $ - $ - $621 $ 634 $ - $ - $634
$ 2,221 $ - $ - $2,221 $ 2,265 $ - $ - $2,265$ 1,053,747 $ - $ 9,340,190 $10,393,937 1,074,822 $ $ 806,117 $ 9,565,115 $ 11,446,054 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,489 $ - $ - $2,489 $ 2,539 $ - $ - $2,539$ 5,765 $ 25,346 $ 51,197 $82,308 $ 5,880 $ 24,873 $ 54,142 $84,895 $ 4,978 $ 21,907 $ 44,250 $71,136 $ 5,078 $ 21,498 $ 46,796 $73,372 $ 1,163 $ - $ - $1,163 $ 1,186 $ - $ - $1,186
$ 722 $ 3,185 $ 6,433 $10,340 $ 737 $ 3,125 $ 6,803 $10,665 $ 4,174 $ 9,185 $ 18,552 $31,910 $ 4,258 $ 9,013 $ 19,619 $32,890 $ 5,199 $ 11,430 $ 23,088 $39,717 $ 5,303 $ 11,217 $ 24,416 $40,936 $ 2,332 $ 5,127 $ 10,356 $17,815 $ 2,379 $ 5,031 $ 10,951 $18,362 $ 2,658 $ 5,841 $ 11,797 $20,296 $ 2,711 $ 5,732 $ 12,476 $20,919 $ 5,148 $ - $ - $5,148 $ 5,251 $ - $ - $5,251$ 2,833 $ 12,464 $ 25,176 $40,472 $ 2,890 $ 12,231 $ 26,624 $41,745 $ 412 $ - $ - $412 $ 421 $ - $ - $421
$ 8,617 $ 37,912 $ 76,577 $123,106 $ 8,789 $ 37,204 $ 80,983 $126,976 $ 3,741 $ - $ - $3,741 $ 3,815 $ - $ - $3,815$ 8,248 $ - $ - $8,248 $ 8,413 $ - $ - $8,413$ 4,185 $ - $ - $4,185 $ 4,268 $ - $ - $4,268$ 4,296 $ 9,460 $ 19,108 $32,864 $ 4,382 $ 9,284 $ 20,208 $33,873 $ 1,865 $ - $ - $1,865 $ 1,902 $ - $ - $1,902$ 6,914 $ 15,202 $ 30,707 $52,823 $ 7,053 $ 14,918 $ 32,473 $54,444 $ 3,794 $ 8,345 $ 16,856 $28,994 $ 3,870 $ 8,189 $ 17,825 $29,884 $ 2,974 $ 13,082 $ 26,425 $42,482 $ 3,034 $ 12,838 $ 27,945 $43,817 $ 8,155 $ 35,865 $ 72,444 $116,464 $ 8,319 $ 35,196 $ 76,611 $120,125 $ 1,793 $ - $ - $1,793 $ 1,829 $ - $ - $1,829$ 7,708 $ 16,944 $ 34,224 $58,876 $ 7,862 $ 16,627 $ 36,193 $60,683 $ 1,864 $ 8,207 $ 16,578 $26,649 $ 1,901 $ 8,054 $ 17,531 $27,486 $ 4,158 $ 18,284 $ 36,931 $59,373 $ 4,241 $ 17,942 $ 39,056 $61,240 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 4,158 $ 18,284 $ 36,931 $59,373 $ 4,241 $ 17,942 $ 39,056 $61,240 $ 15,452 $ 67,977 $ 137,305 $220,733 $ 15,761 $ 66,707 $ 145,204 $227,672 $ 5,301 $ 11,671 $ 23,573 $40,545 $ 5,407 $ 11,453 $ 24,929 $41,789 $ 922 $ - $ - $922 $ 940 $ - $ - $940
$ 5,556 $ 12,211 $ 24,664 $42,431 $ 5,667 $ 11,983 $ 26,083 $43,733 $ 1,288 $ 5,664 $ 11,441 $18,393 $ 1,314 $ 5,558 $ 12,099 $18,972 $ 405 $ - $ - $405 $ 413 $ - $ - $413
$ 3,600 $ 7,910 $ 15,978 $27,487 $ 3,672 $ 7,762 $ 16,897 $28,331 $ 2,212 $ - $ - $2,212 $ 2,256 $ - $ - $2,256
$ 7,442 $ 16,359 $ 33,044 $56,845 $ 7,591 $ 16,054 $ 34,945 $58,590 $ 1,825 $ 4,028 $ 8,136 $13,990 $ 1,862 $ 3,953 $ 8,604 $14,419 $ 2,565 $ - $ - $2,565 $ 2,616 $ - $ - $2,616
$ 1,400 $ 3,086 $ 6,234 $10,720 $ 1,428 $ 3,029 $ 6,593 $11,049 $ 3,975 $ - $ - $3,975 $ 4,054 $ - $ - $4,054
$ 2,724 $ - $ - $2,724 $ 2,778 $ - $ - $2,778
$ 3,082 $ 13,569 $ 27,407 $44,058 $ 3,144 $ 13,315 $ 28,984 $45,443 $ 5,924 $ - $ - $5,924 $ 6,043 $ - $ - $6,043
$ 25,440 $ - $ - $25,440 $ 25,948 $ - $ - $25,948$ 2,078 $ - $ - $2,078 $ 2,120 $ - $ - $2,120 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20
$ 33,705 $ 148,225 $ 299,396 $481,326 $ 34,379 $ 145,457 $ 316,621 $496,457 $ 285,079 $ 1,257,497 $ 2,539,993 $4,082,569 $ 290,781 $ 1,234,016 $ 2,686,119 $4,210,916 $ 4,538 $ - $ - $4,538 $ 4,628 $ - $ - $4,628
$ 2,557 $ 11,246 $ 22,716 $36,519 $ 2,608 $ 11,036 $ 24,023 $37,667 $ 1,652 $ - $ - $1,652 $ 1,685 $ - $ - $1,685
$ 3,407 $ 14,993 $ 30,285 $48,685 $ 3,475 $ 14,713 $ 32,027 $50,215 $ 4,810 $ 21,158 $ 42,737 $68,706 $ 4,906 $ 20,763 $ 45,196 $70,865 $ 4,606 $ 20,260 $ 40,922 $65,788 $ 4,698 $ 19,881 $ 43,276 $67,856 $ 7,305 $ - $ - $7,305 $ 7,451 $ - $ - $7,451
$ 27,359 $ - $ - $27,359 $ 27,906 $ - $ - $27,906$ 1,575 $ 3,469 $ 7,006 $12,050 $ 1,607 $ 3,404 $ 7,409 $12,420 $ 3,721 $ - $ - $3,721 $ 3,795 $ - $ - $3,795
$ 11,295 $ 49,694 $ 100,375 $161,364 $ 11,521 $ 48,766 $ 106,150 $166,437 $ 4,924 $ - $ - $4,924 $ 5,023 $ - $ - $5,023
$ 12,022 $ 26,444 $ 53,413 $91,879 $ 12,262 $ 25,950 $ 56,486 $94,699 $ 4,643 $ - $ - $4,643 $ 4,736 $ - $ - $4,736
$ 4,635 $ 20,381 $ 41,167 $66,184 $ 4,728 $ 20,001 $ 43,536 $68,265 $ 1,077 $ - $ - $1,077 $ 1,099 $ - $ - $1,099
$ 3,775 $ - $ - $3,775 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $3,850
$ 4,209 $ - $ - $4,209 $ 4,293 $ - $ - $4,293
$ 1,674 $ 3,680 $ 7,433 $12,787 $ 1,707 $ 3,611 $ 7,861 $13,180 $ 2,840 $ 12,490 $ 25,229 $40,560 $ 2,897 $ 12,257 $ 26,680 $41,835 $ 1,375 $ 6,054 $ 12,229 $19,659 $ 1,403 $ 5,941 $ 12,933 $20,277 $ 20,410 $ - $ - $20,410 $ 20,818 $ - $ - $20,818$ 2,478 $ 5,459 $ 11,027 $18,964 $ 2,528 $ 5,357 $ 11,661 $19,546 City of Santa Monica $ 6,267 $ 27,557 $ 55,661 $89,485 $ 6,393 $ 27,042 $ 58,863 $92,298 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 6,267 $ 27,557 $ 55,661 $89,485 $ 6,393 $ 27,042 $ 58,863 $92,298 $ 4,892 1,111 $ 9,882 $ $15,885 $ 1,133 $ 4,801 $ 10,450 $16,384 $ 982 $ 2,161 $ 4,364 $7,507 $ 1,002 $ 2,120 $ 4,615 $7,737 $ 1,574 $ - $ - $1,574 $ 1,606 $ - $ - $1,606
$ 6,272 $ 13,787 $ 27,847 $47,906 $ 6,397 $ 13,529 $ 29,449 $49,376 $ 1,967 $ 8,651 $ 17,474 $28,092 $ 2,006 $ 8,490 $ 18,479 $28,975 $ 2,602 $ - $ - $2,602 $ 2,654 $ - $ - $2,654
$ 11,382 $ 50,068 $ 101,132 $162,583 $ 11,610 $ 49,133 $ 106,950 $167,694 $ 943 $ 11,858 $ 23,952 $36,753 $ 962 $ 11,637 $ 25,330 $37,928 $ 3,184 $ - $ - $3,184 $ 3,248 $ - $ - $3,248
$ 8,504 $ 37,411 $ 75,565 $121,480 $ 8,674 $ 36,712 $ 79,913 $125,299 $ 1,435 $ - $ - $1,435 $ 1,463 $ - $ - $1,463
$ 7,147 $ 15,722 $ 31,758 $54,627 $ 7,290 $ 15,429 $ 33,585 $56,303 $ 340,893 $ 2,536,442 $ 5,123,310 $8,000,645 $ 347,710 $ 2,489,080 $ 5,418,054 $8,254,845 $ 501 $ 1,101 $ 2,224 $3,826 $ 511 $ 1,081 $ 2,352 $3,944 $ 26,086 $ 114,577 $ 231,431 $372,094 $ 26,608 $ 112,437 $ 244,745 $383,791 $ 1,774 $ 7,791 $ 15,737 $25,301 $ 1,809 $ 7,645 $ 16,642 $26,096 $ 1,578 $ - $ - $1,578 $ 1,609 $ - $ - $1,609
$ 5,863 $ - $ - $5,863 $ 5,981 $ - $ - $5,981
$ 4,498 $ - $ - $4,498 $ 4,588 $ - $ - $4,588
$ 1,451 $ - $ - $1,451 $ 1,480 $ - $ - $1,480
$ 4,297 $ - $ - $4,297 $ 4,383 $ - $ - $4,383
$ 647 $ - $ - $647 $ 659 $ - $ - $659
$ 2,311 $ - $ - $2,311 $ 2,357 $ - $ - $2,357
$ 1,096,319 $ 4,833,329 $ 9,762,746 $ 15,692,394 $ 1,118,245 $ 4,743,078 $ 10,324,397 $ 16,185,720 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,590 $ - $ - $2,590 $ 2,642 $ - $ - $2,642
$ 5,998 $ 49,609 $ 54,859 $110,466 $ 6,118 $ 49,699 $ 55,760 $111,576 $ 5,179 $ 42,878 $ 47,416 $95,473 $ 5,283 $ 42,956 $ 48,194 $96,433$ 1,210 $ - $ - $1,210 $ 1,234 $ - $ - $1,234 $ 752 $ 6,233 $ 6,893 $13,877 $ 767 $ 6,244 $ 7,006 $14,017 $ 4,343 $ 17,976 $ 19,879 $42,198 $ 4,430 $ 18,009 $ 20,205 $42,643$ 5,409 $ 22,372 $ 24,739 $52,520 $ 5,518 $ 22,412 $ 25,145 $53,075$ 2,427 $ 10,034 $ 11,096 $23,557 $ 2,475 $ 10,053 $ 11,278 $23,806$ 2,765 $ 11,432 $ 12,641 $26,838 $ 2,820 $ 11,452 $ 12,849 $27,121$ 5,356 $ - $ - $5,356 $ 5,463 $ - $ - $5,463 $ 2,947 $ 24,395 $ 26,976 $54,318 $ 3,006 $ 24,439 $ 27,419 $54,864 $ 429 $ - $ - $429 $ 438 $ - $ - $438
$ 8,965 $ 74,203 $ 82,055 $165,223 $ 9,144 $ 74,337 $ 83,402 $166,883 $ 3,892 $ - $ - $3,892 $ 3,970 $ - $ - $3,970
$ 8,581 $ - $ - $8,581 $ 8,753 $ - $ - $8,753$ 4,354 $ - $ - $4,354 $ 4,441 $ - $ - $4,441$ 4,469 $ 18,516 $ 20,475 $43,460 $ 4,559 $ 18,549 $ 20,811 $43,919$ 1,940 $ - $ - $1,940 $ 1,979 $ - $ - $1,979$ 7,194 $ 29,755 $ 32,903 $69,852 $ 7,337 $ 29,808 $ 33,443 $70,589$ 3,947 $ 16,333 $ 18,061 $38,341 $ 4,026 $ 16,362 $ 18,358 $38,746$ 3,094 $ 25,605 $ 28,315 $57,015 $ 3,156 $ 25,652 $ 28,780 $57,588$ 8,485 $ 70,197 $ 77,625 $156,307 $ 8,655 $ 70,324 $ 78,900 $157,878 $ 1,865 $ - $ - $1,865 $ 1,903 $ - $ - $1,903
$ 8,019 $ 33,163 $ 36,672 $77,855 $ 8,180 $ 33,223 $ 37,274 $78,677$ 1,939 $ 16,063 $ 17,763 $35,766 $ 1,978 $ 16,093 $ 18,055 $36,125 $ 4,326 $ 35,786 $ 39,573 $79,685 $ 4,413 $ 35,851 $ 40,223 $80,486 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 4,326 $ 35,786 $ 39,573 $79,685 $ 4,413 $ 35,851 $ 40,223 $80,486 $ 133,047 16,076 $ 147,126 $ $296,249 $ 16,398 $ 133,287 $ 149,541 $299,226 $ 5,516 $ 22,842 $ 25,259 $53,617 $ 5,626 $ 22,883 $ 25,674 $54,183 $ 959 $ - $ - $959 $ 978 $ - $ - $978
$ 5,780 $ 23,900 $ 26,429 $56,108 $ 5,896 $ 23,943 $ 26,863 $56,701$ 1,341 $ 11,086 $ 12,259 $24,686 $ 1,367 $ 11,106 $ 12,460 $24,934 $ 421 $ - $ - $421 $ 429 $ - $ - $429
$ 3,745 $ 15,482 $ 17,120 $36,348 $ 3,820 $ 15,510 $ 17,402 $36,732$ 2,301 $ - $ - $2,301 $ 2,347 $ - $ - $2,347$ 7,743 $ 32,019 $ 35,407 $75,169 $ 7,898 $ 32,077 $ 35,989 $75,963$ 1,899 $ 7,884 $ 8,718 $18,501 $ 1,937 $ 7,898 $ 8,861 $18,697$ 2,669 $ - $ - $2,669 $ 2,722 $ - $ - $2,722$ 1,456 $ 6,041 $ 6,680 $14,177 $ 1,486 $ 6,052 $ 6,790 $14,327$ 4,135 $ - $ - $4,135 $ 4,218 $ - $ - $4,218$ 2,834 $ - $ - $2,834 $ 2,891 $ - $ - $2,891$ 3,207 $ 26,557 $ 29,367 $59,131 $ 3,271 $ 26,605 $ 29,849 $59,725$ 6,163 $ - $ - $6,163 $ 6,287 $ - $ - $6,287 $ 26,467 $ - $ - $26,467 $ 26,997 $ - $ - $26,997
$ 2,162 $ - $ - $2,162 $ 2,206 $ - $ - $2,206
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
$ 290,112 35,067 $ 320,812 $ $645,991 $ 35,768 $ 290,637 $ 326,079 $652,483 $ 296,597 $ 2,461,226 $ 2,721,681 $5,479,504 $ 302,529 $ 2,465,677 $ 2,766,358 $5,534,564 $ 4,721 $ - $ - $4,721 $ 4,815 $ - $ - $4,815
$ 2,661 $ 22,011 $ 24,341 $49,013 $ 2,714 $ 22,051 $ 24,740 $49,505$ 1,718 $ - $ - $1,718 $ 1,753 $ - $ - $1,753$ 3,544 $ 29,346 $ 32,451 $65,341 $ 3,615 $ 29,399 $ 32,984 $65,997$ 5,005 $ 41,412 $ 45,794 $92,211 $ 5,105 $ 41,487 $ 46,546 $93,137$ 4,792 $ 39,653 $ 43,849 $88,294 $ 4,888 $ 39,725 $ 44,569 $89,181$ 7,600 $ - $ - $7,600 $ 7,752 $ - $ - $7,752 $ 28,464 $ - $ - $28,464 $ 29,033 $ - $ - $29,033
$ 1,639 $ 6,789 $ 7,507 $15,935 $ 1,672 $ 6,801 $ 7,631 $16,104$ 3,871 $ - $ - $3,871 $ 3,949 $ - $ - $3,949 $ 11,752 $ 97,263 $ 107,555 $216,570 $ 11,987 $ 97,438 $ 109,321 $218,746 $ 5,123 $ - $ - $5,123 $ 5,226 $ - $ - $5,226
$ 12,508 $ 51,757 $ 57,234 $121,499 $ 12,758 $ 51,851 $ 58,173 $122,782 $ 4,830 $ - $ - $4,830 $ 4,927 $ - $ - $4,927$ 4,823 $ 39,891 $ 44,112 $88,826 $ 4,919 $ 39,963 $ 44,836 $89,718$ 1,121 $ - $ - $1,121 $ 1,143 $ - $ - $1,143$ 3,927 $ - $ - $3,927 $ 4,006 $ - $ - $4,006$ 4,379 $ - $ - $4,379 $ 4,467 $ - $ - $4,467$ 1,741 $ 7,203 $ 7,965 $16,910 $ 1,776 $ 7,216 $ 8,096 $17,088$ 2,955 $ 24,446 $ 27,033 $54,435 $ 3,014 $ 24,491 $ 27,477 $54,982$ 1,431 $ 11,850 $ 13,104 $26,385 $ 1,459 $ 11,872 $ 13,319 $26,650 $ 21,235 $ - $ - $21,235 $ 21,659 $ - $ - $21,659
$ 2,578 $ 10,685 $ 11,816 $25,079 $ 2,630 $ 10,704 $ 12,010 $25,343 City of Santa Monica $ 6,520 $ 53,935 $ 59,643 $120,098 $ 6,651 $ 54,033 $ 60,622 $121,305 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 6,520 $ 53,935 $ 59,643 $120,098 $ 6,651 $ 54,033 $ 60,622 $121,305 $ 1,156 $ 9,575 $ 10,588 $21,320 $ 1,179 $ 9,592 $ 10,762 $21,534 $ 1,022 $ 4,229 $ 4,676 $9,927 $ 1,042 $ 4,237 $ 4,753 $10,032$ 1,638 $ - $ - $1,638 $ 1,671 $ - $ - $1,671 $ 6,525 $ 26,984 $ 29,839 $63,348 $ 6,656 $ 27,032 $ 30,329 $64,017$ 2,046 $ 16,932 $ 18,724 $37,703 $ 2,087 $ 16,963 $ 19,031 $38,081$ 2,707 $ - $ - $2,707 $ 2,762 $ - $ - $2,762 $ 11,842 $ 97,996 $ 108,366 $218,204 $ 12,079 $ 98,173 $ 110,145 $220,397 $ 981 $ 23,209 $ 25,665 $49,855 $ 1,001 $ 23,251 $ 26,086 $50,338 $ 3,313 $ - $ - $3,313 $ 3,379 $ - $ - $3,379
$ 8,848 $ 73,222 $ 80,971 $163,041 $ 9,025 $ 73,355 $ 82,300 $164,679 $ 1,493 $ - $ - $1,493 $ 1,522 $ - $ - $1,522
$ 7,436 $ 30,773 $ 34,029 $72,237 $ 7,584 $ 30,828 $ 34,588 $73,000 $ 354,665 $ 4,964,433 $ 5,489,785 $10,808,883 $ 361,758 $ 4,973,411 $ 5,579,902 $10,915,071 $ 522 $ 2,155 $ 2,383 $5,060 $ 532 $ 2,159 $ 2,422 $5,113 $ 27,140 $ 224,254 $ 247,986 $499,380 $ 27,683 $ 224,660 $ 252,056 $504,399 $ 1,845 $ 15,249 $ 16,862 $33,956 $ 1,882 $ 15,276 $ 17,139 $34,297$ 1,641 $ - $ - $1,641 $ 1,674 $ - $ - $1,674$ 6,100 $ - $ - $6,100 $ 6,222 $ - $ - $6,222$ 4,680 $ - $ - $4,680 $ 4,773 $ - $ - $4,773$ 1,509 $ - $ - $1,509 $ 1,540 $ - $ - $1,540$ 4,470 $ - $ - $4,470 $ 4,560 $ - $ - $4,560 $ 673 $ - $ - $673 $ 686 $ - $ - $686
$ 2,404 $ - $ - $2,404 $ 2,452 $ - $ - $2,452
$ 1,140,610 $ 9,459,997 $ 10,461,085 $ 21,061,691 $ 1,163,422 $ 9,477,106 $ 10,632,806 $ 21,273,334 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,695 $ - $ - $2,695 $ 2,748 $ - $ - $2,748
$ 6,240 $ 49,511 $ 56,678 $112,429 $ 6,365 $ 49,324 $ 57,615 $113,304$ 5,389 $ 42,793 $ 48,988 $97,170 $ 5,496 $ 42,632 $ 49,798 $97,926 $ 1,259 $ - $ - $1,259 $ 1,284 $ - $ - $1,284
$ 782 $ 6,221 $ 7,121 $14,124 $ 798 $ 6,197 $ 7,239 $14,234 $ 4,518 $ 17,941 $ 20,538 $42,997 $ 4,608 $ 17,873 $ 20,877 $43,359 $ 5,628 $ 22,327 $ 25,560 $53,515 $ 5,741 $ 22,243 $ 25,982 $53,966 $ 2,525 $ 10,014 $ 11,464 $24,004 $ 2,575 $ 9,977 $ 11,654 $24,206 $ 2,877 $ 11,409 $ 13,060 $27,346 $ 2,934 $ 11,366 $ 13,276 $27,577 $ 5,572 $ - $ - $5,572 $ 5,684 $ - $ - $5,684
$ 3,066 $ 24,346 $ 27,871 $55,284 $ 3,128 $ 24,255 $ 28,332 $55,714 $ 446 $ - $ - $446 $ 455 $ - $ - $455
$ 9,327 $ 74,055 $ 84,776 $168,159 $ 9,514 $ 73,777 $ 86,177 $169,468 $ 4,049 $ - $ - $4,049 $ 4,130 $ - $ - $4,130
$ 8,928 $ - $ - $8,928 $ 9,106 $ - $ - $9,106
$ 4,530 $ - $ - $4,530 $ 4,620 $ - $ - $4,620
$ 4,650 $ 18,479 $ 21,154 $44,283 $ 4,743 $ 18,409 $ 21,504 $44,656 $ 2,019 $ - $ - $2,019 $ 2,059 $ - $ - $2,059
$ 7,484 $ 29,696 $ 33,994 $71,174 $ 7,634 $ 29,584 $ 34,556 $71,774 $ 4,107 $ 16,300 $ 18,660 $39,067 $ 4,189 $ 16,239 $ 18,969 $39,397 $ 3,219 $ 25,555 $ 29,254 $58,028 $ 3,284 $ 25,458 $ 29,738 $58,480 $ 8,828 $ 70,058 $ 80,199 $159,085 $ 9,004 $ 69,794 $ 81,525 $160,323$ 1,941 $ - $ - $1,941 $ 1,979 $ - $ - $1,979 $ 8,343 $ 33,097 $ 37,888 $79,329 $ 8,510 $ 32,973 $ 38,515 $79,997 $ 2,017 $ 16,032 $ 18,352 $36,401 $ 2,058 $ 15,971 $ 18,656 $36,685 $ 4,501 $ 35,715 $ 40,885 $81,101 $ 4,591 $ 35,580 $ 41,561 $81,732 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 4,501 $ 35,715 $ 40,885 $81,101 $ 4,591 $ 35,580 $ 41,561 $81,732 $ 16,726 $ 132,783 $ 152,005 $301,513 $ 17,060 $ 132,283 $ 154,518 $303,860 $ 5,738 $ 22,797 $ 26,097 $54,632 $ 5,853 $ 22,711 $ 26,528 $55,093 $ 998 $ - $ - $998 $ 1,018 $ - $ - $1,018
$ 6,014 $ 23,852 $ 27,305 $57,171 $ 6,134 $ 23,762 $ 27,756 $57,652 $ 1,395 $ 11,064 $ 12,666 $25,124 $ 1,423 $ 11,022 $ 12,875 $25,320 $ 438 $ - $ - $438 $ 447 $ - $ - $447
$ 3,896 $ 15,451 $ 17,688 $37,036 $ 3,974 $ 15,393 $ 17,981 $37,348 $ 2,394 $ - $ - $2,394 $ 2,442 $ - $ - $2,442
$ 8,056 $ 31,955 $ 36,582 $76,593 $ 8,217 $ 31,835 $ 37,186 $77,238 $ 1,976 $ 7,868 $ 9,007 $18,851 $ 2,015 $ 7,839 $ 9,156 $19,010 $ 2,777 $ - $ - $2,777 $ 2,832 $ - $ - $2,832
$ 1,515 $ 6,029 $ 6,902 $14,446 $ 1,546 $ 6,006 $ 7,016 $14,567 $ 4,302 $ - $ - $4,302 $ 4,389 $ - $ - $4,389
$ 2,948 $ - $ - $2,948 $ 3,007 $ - $ - $3,007
$ 3,336 $ 26,504 $ 30,341 $60,182 $ 3,403 $ 26,404 $ 30,843 $60,650 $ 6,412 $ - $ - $6,412 $ 6,541 $ - $ - $6,541
$ 27,537 $ - $ - $27,537 $ 28,087 $ - $ - $28,087
$ 2,250 $ - $ - $2,250 $ 2,295 $ - $ - $2,295
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24
$ 36,484 $ 289,536 $ 331,450 $657,470 $ 37,213 $ 288,446 $ 336,929 $662,588 $ 308,579 $ 2,456,338 $ 2,811,929 $5,576,846 $ 314,751 $ 2,447,090 $ 2,858,411 $5,620,252 $ 4,912 $ - $ - $4,912 $ 5,010 $ - $ - $5,010
$ 2,768 $ 21,968 $ 25,148 $49,884 $ 2,823 $ 21,885 $ 25,564 $50,272 $ 1,788 $ - $ - $1,788 $ 1,823 $ - $ - $1,823
$ 3,687 $ 29,287 $ 33,527 $66,502 $ 3,761 $ 29,177 $ 34,081 $67,019 $ 5,207 $ 41,330 $ 47,313 $93,849 $ 5,311 $ 41,174 $ 48,095 $94,580 $ 4,986 $ 39,574 $ 45,303 $89,863 $ 5,086 $ 39,425 $ 46,052 $90,563 $ 7,907 $ - $ - $7,907 $ 8,065 $ - $ - $8,065
$ 29,614 $ - $ - $29,614 $ 30,206 $ - $ - $30,206
$ 1,705 $ 6,776 $ 7,756 $16,237 $ 1,739 $ 6,750 $ 7,885 $16,374 $ 4,028 $ - $ - $4,028 $ 4,108 $ - $ - $4,108
$ 12,227 $ 97,069 $ 111,122 $220,418 $ 12,471 $ 96,704 $ 112,959 $222,134 $ 5,330 $ - $ - $5,330 $ 5,437 $ - $ - $5,437
$ 13,013 $ 51,654 $ 59,132 $123,799 $ 13,273 $ 51,460 $ 60,109 $124,842 $ 5,026 $ - $ - $5,026 $ 5,126 $ - $ - $5,126
$ 5,017 $ 39,812 $ 45,575 $90,404 $ 5,118 $ 39,662 $ 46,328 $91,108 $ 1,166 $ - $ - $1,166 $ 1,190 $ - $ - $1,190
$ 4,086 $ - $ - $4,086 $ 4,168 $ - $ - $4,168
$ 4,556 $ - $ - $4,556 $ 4,647 $ - $ - $4,647
$ 1,812 $ 7,189 $ 8,229 $17,230 $ 1,848 $ 7,162 $ 8,365 $17,375$ 3,075 $ 24,398 $ 27,930 $55,402 $ 3,136 $ 24,306 $ 28,392 $55,834 $ 1,489 $ 11,827 $ 13,539 $26,854 $ 1,518 $ 11,782 $ 13,762 $27,063 $ 22,093 $ - $ - $22,093 $ 22,534 $ - $ - $22,534
$ 2,682 $ 10,664 $ 12,207 $25,553 $ 2,736 $ 10,624 $ 12,409 $25,769 City of Santa Monica $ 6,784 $ 53,828 $ 61,620 $122,232 $ 6,920 $ 53,625 $ 62,639 $123,184 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 6,784 $ 53,828 $ 61,620 $122,232 $ 6,920 $ 53,625 $ 62,639 $123,184 $ 9,556 1,203 $ 10,940 $ $21,698 $ 1,227 $ 9,520 $ 11,120 $21,867$ 1,063 $ 4,221 $ 4,832 $10,115 $ 1,084 $ 4,205 $ 4,911 $10,200 $ 1,704 $ - $ - $1,704 $ 1,738 $ - $ - $1,738
$ 6,789 $ 26,930 $ 30,828 $64,547 $ 6,925 $ 26,829 $ 31,338 $65,091 $ 2,129 $ 16,899 $ 19,345 $38,372 $ 2,172 $ 16,835 $ 19,665 $38,671 $ 2,817 $ - $ - $2,817 $ 2,873 $ - $ - $2,873
$ 12,320 $ 97,801 $ 111,959 $222,081 $ 12,567 $ 97,433 $ 113,810 $223,810 $ 1,021 $ 23,163 $ 26,516 $50,700 $ 1,041 $ 23,076 $ 26,955 $51,071 $ 3,447 $ - $ - $3,447 $ 3,516 $ - $ - $3,516
$ 9,205 $ 73,077 $ 83,656 $165,937 $ 9,389 $ 72,802 $ 85,039 $167,229$ 1,553 $ - $ - $1,553 $ 1,584 $ - $ - $1,584 $ 7,736 $ 30,712 $ 35,158 $73,605 $ 7,891 $ 30,596 $ 35,739 $74,225 $ 368,993 $ 4,954,574 $ 5,671,820 $10,995,387 $ 376,373 $ 4,935,919 $ 5,765,577 $11,077,869 $ 543 $ 2,151 $ 2,462 $5,156 $ 554 $ 2,143 $ 2,503 $5,199 $ 28,237 $ 223,809 $ 256,209 $508,254 $ 28,801 $ 222,966 $ 260,444 $512,212 $ 1,920 $ 15,218 $ 17,421 $34,559 $ 1,958 $ 15,161 $ 17,709 $34,828 $ 1,708 $ - $ - $1,708 $ 1,742 $ - $ - $1,742
$ 6,347 $ - $ - $6,347 $ 6,474 $ - $ - $6,474
$ 4,869 $ - $ - $4,869 $ 4,966 $ - $ - $4,966
$ 1,570 $ - $ - $1,570 $ 1,602 $ - $ - $1,602
$ 4,651 $ - $ - $4,651 $ 4,744 $ - $ - $4,744
$ 700 $ - $ - $700 $ 714 $ - $ - $714
$ 2,501 $ - $ - $2,501 $ 2,551 $ - $ - $2,551
$ 1,186,691 $ 9,441,210 $ 10,807,962 $ 21,435,863 $ 1,210,424 $ 9,405,662 $ 10,986,621 $ 21,602,708 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,803 $ - $ - $2,803 $ 2,860 $ - $ - $2,860
$ 6,492 $ 49,419 $ 58,571 $114,482 $ 6,622 $ 49,237 $ 59,545 $115,404 $ 5,606 $ 42,714 $ 50,624 $98,944 $ 5,719 $ 42,556 $ 51,466 $99,741 $ 1,310 $ - $ - $1,310 $ 1,336 $ - $ - $1,336
$ 814 $ 6,209 $ 7,359 $14,382 $ 830 $ 6,186 $ 7,482 $14,498 $ 4,701 $ 17,908 $ 21,224 $43,832 $ 4,795 $ 17,841 $ 21,577 $44,213 $ 5,855 $ 22,286 $ 26,413 $54,555 $ 5,972 $ 22,204 $ 26,853 $55,029 $ 2,627 $ 9,996 $ 11,847 $24,470 $ 2,679 $ 9,959 $ 12,044 $24,683$ 2,993 $ 11,388 $ 13,497 $27,877 $ 3,053 $ 11,346 $ 13,721 $28,120 $ 5,797 $ - $ - $5,797 $ 5,913 $ - $ - $5,913
$ 3,190 $ 24,302 $ 28,801 $56,293 $ 3,254 $ 24,212 $ 29,281 $56,747 $ 464 $ - $ - $464 $ 474 $ - $ - $474
$ 9,704 $ 73,919 $ 87,607 $171,230 $ 9,898 $ 73,646 $ 89,065 $172,609 $ 4,213 $ - $ - $4,213 $ 4,297 $ - $ - $4,297
$ 9,288 $ - $ - $9,288 $ 9,474 $ - $ - $9,474
$ 4,713 $ - $ - $4,713 $ 4,807 $ - $ - $4,807
$ 4,838 $ 18,445 $ 21,861 $45,143 $ 4,935 $ 18,377 $ 22,224 $45,536 $ 2,100 $ - $ - $2,100 $ 2,142 $ - $ - $2,142
$ 7,787 $ 29,641 $ 35,129 $72,557 $ 7,942 $ 29,531 $ 35,714 $73,188 $ 4,273 $ 16,270 $ 19,283 $39,826 $ 4,358 $ 16,210 $ 19,604 $40,173 $ 3,350 $ 25,507 $ 30,231 $59,088 $ 3,417 $ 25,413 $ 30,734 $59,564 $ 9,184 $ 69,929 $ 82,877 $161,990 $ 9,368 $ 69,670 $ 84,257 $163,295 $ 2,019 $ - $ - $2,019 $ 2,059 $ - $ - $2,059
$ 8,680 $ 33,036 $ 39,154 $80,870 $ 8,854 $ 32,914 $ 39,805 $81,573 $ 2,099 $ 16,002 $ 18,965 $37,066 $ 2,141 $ 15,943 $ 19,281 $37,365 $ 4,683 $ 35,649 $ 42,250 $82,582 $ 4,776 $ 35,517 $ 42,954 $83,247 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 4,683 $ 35,649 $ 42,250 $82,582 $ 4,776 $ 35,517 $ 42,954 $83,247 $ 132,538 17,401 $ $ 157,080 $307,020 $ 17,749 $ 132,048 $ 159,695 $309,492 $ 5,970 $ 22,755 $ 26,968 $55,693 $ 6,090 $ 22,671 $ 27,417 $56,178 $ 1,038 $ - $ - $1,038 $ 1,059 $ - $ - $1,059
$ 6,256 $ 23,808 $ 28,217 $58,281 $ 6,382 $ 23,720 $ 28,686 $58,788 $ 1,451 $ 11,044 $ 13,089 $25,583 $ 1,480 $ 11,003 $ 13,306 $25,789 $ 456 $ - $ - $456 $ 465 $ - $ - $465
$ 4,054 $ 15,423 $ 18,279 $37,756 $ 4,135 $ 15,366 $ 18,583 $38,084 $ 2,491 $ - $ - $2,491 $ 2,541 $ - $ - $2,541
$ 8,381 $ 31,897 $ 37,803 $78,081 $ 8,549 $ 31,779 $ 38,432 $78,760 $ 2,056 $ 7,854 $ 9,308 $19,217 $ 2,097 $ 7,825 $ 9,463 $19,384 $ 2,889 $ - $ - $2,889 $ 2,947 $ - $ - $2,947
$ 1,576 $ 6,018 $ 7,132 $14,726 $ 1,608 $ 5,995 $ 7,251 $14,854 $ 4,476 $ - $ - $4,476 $ 4,566 $ - $ - $4,566
$ 3,067 $ - $ - $3,067 $ 3,129 $ - $ - $3,129
$ 3,471 $ 26,455 $ 31,354 $61,281 $ 3,541 $ 26,358 $ 31,876 $61,774 $ 6,671 $ - $ - $6,671 $ 6,805 $ - $ - $6,805
$ 28,649 $ - $ - $28,649 $ 29,222 $ - $ - $29,222
$ 2,341 $ - $ - $2,341 $ 2,387 $ - $ - $2,387
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26
$ 289,002 37,957 $ $ 342,518 $669,478 $ 38,717 $ 287,934 $ 348,218 $674,869 $ 321,046 $ 2,451,814 $ 2,905,823 $5,678,682 $ 327,467 $ 2,442,752 $ 2,954,183 $5,724,402 $ 5,110 $ - $ - $5,110 $ 5,212 $ - $ - $5,212
$ 2,880 $ 21,927 $ 25,988 $50,795 $ 2,938 $ 21,846 $ 26,420 $51,204 $ 1,860 $ - $ - $1,860 $ 1,897 $ - $ - $1,897
$ 3,836 $ 29,233 $ 34,647 $67,716 $ 3,913 $ 29,125 $ 35,223 $68,261 $ 5,417 $ 41,253 $ 48,892 $95,563 $ 5,526 $ 41,101 $ 49,706 $96,333 $ 5,187 $ 39,501 $ 46,816 $91,504 $ 5,291 $ 39,355 $ 47,595 $92,241 $ 8,227 $ - $ - $8,227 $ 8,391 $ - $ - $8,391
$ 30,810 $ - $ - $30,810 $ 31,426 $ - $ - $31,426
$ 1,774 $ 6,763 $ 8,015 $16,553 $ 1,810 $ 6,738 $ 8,149 $16,696 $ 4,190 $ - $ - $4,190 $ 4,274 $ - $ - $4,274
$ 12,721 $ 96,891 $ 114,832 $224,443 $ 12,975 $ 96,533 $ 116,743 $226,251 $ 5,546 $ - $ - $5,546 $ 5,657 $ - $ - $5,657
$ 13,539 $ 51,559 $ 61,106 $126,204 $ 13,809 $ 51,368 $ 62,123 $127,301 $ 5,229 $ - $ - $5,229 $ 5,333 $ - $ - $5,333
$ 5,220 $ 39,738 $ 47,097 $92,055 $ 5,325 $ 39,591 $ 47,881 $92,797 $ 1,213 $ - $ - $1,213 $ 1,238 $ - $ - $1,238
$ 4,251 $ - $ - $4,251 $ 4,336 $ - $ - $4,336
$ 4,740 $ - $ - $4,740 $ 4,835 $ - $ - $4,835
$ 1,885 $ 7,175 $ 8,504 $17,565 $ 1,923 $ 7,149 $ 8,646 $17,717 $ 3,199 $ 24,353 $ 28,863 $56,414 $ 3,263 $ 24,263 $ 29,343 $56,869 $ 1,549 $ 11,805 $ 13,991 $27,344 $ 1,580 $ 11,761 $ 14,224 $27,564 $ 22,985 $ - $ - $22,985 $ 23,445 $ - $ - $23,445$ 2,791 $ 10,644 $ 12,615 $26,050 $ 2,846 $ 10,605 $ 12,825 $26,276 City of Santa Monica $ 7,058 $ 53,729 $ 63,678 $124,465 $ 7,199 $ 53,530 $ 64,738 $125,467 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 7,058 $ 53,729 $ 63,678 $124,465 $ 7,199 $ 53,530 $ 64,738 $125,467 $ 9,539 1,251 $ $ 11,305 $22,095 $ 1,276 $ 9,503 $ 11,493 $22,273$ 1,106 $ 4,213 $ 4,993 $10,311 $ 1,128 $ 4,197 $ 5,076 $10,401 $ 1,773 $ - $ - $1,773 $ 1,809 $ - $ - $1,809
$ 7,063 $ 26,880 $ 31,858 $65,802 $ 7,205 $ 26,781 $ 32,388 $66,374 $ 2,215 $ 16,867 $ 19,991 $39,073 $ 2,259 $ 16,805 $ 20,324 $39,388 $ 2,931 $ - $ - $2,931 $ 2,989 $ - $ - $2,989
$ 12,818 $ 97,621 $ 115,698 $226,137 $ 13,075 $ 97,260 $ 117,623 $227,958 $ 1,062 $ 23,120 $ 27,402 $51,584 $ 1,083 $ 23,035 $ 27,858 $51,976 $ 3,586 $ - $ - $3,586 $ 3,658 $ - $ - $3,658
$ 9,577 $ 72,942 $ 86,449 $168,968 $ 9,769 $ 72,673 $ 87,888 $170,329 $ 1,616 $ - $ - $1,616 $ 1,648 $ - $ - $1,648
$ 8,049 $ 30,655 $ 36,332 $75,035 $ 8,209 $ 30,542 $ 36,936 $75,687 $ 383,900 $ 4,945,447 $ 5,861,209 $11,190,557 $ 391,578 $ 4,927,170 $ 5,958,754 $11,277,502 $ 565 $ 2,147 $ 2,544 $5,256 $ 576 $ 2,139 $ 2,587 $5,302 $ 29,377 $ 223,397 $ 264,764 $517,538 $ 29,965 $ 222,571 $ 269,170 $521,706 $ 1,997 $ 15,190 $ 18,003 $35,191 $ 2,037 $ 15,134 $ 18,303 $35,474 $ 1,777 $ - $ - $1,777 $ 1,812 $ - $ - $1,812
$ 6,603 $ - $ - $6,603 $ 6,735 $ - $ - $6,735
$ 5,066 $ - $ - $5,066 $ 5,167 $ - $ - $5,167
$ 1,634 $ - $ - $1,634 $ 1,666 $ - $ - $1,666
$ 4,839 $ - $ - $4,839 $ 4,935 $ - $ - $4,935
$ 728 $ - $ - $728 $ 743 $ - $ - $743
$ 2,602 $ - $ - $2,602 $ 2,654 $ - $ - $2,654
$ 1,234,633 $ 9,423,819 $ 11,168,853 $ 21,827,305 $ 1,259,326 $ 9,388,990 $ 11,354,730 $ 22,003,046 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 2,917 $ - $ - $2,917 $ 2,975 $ - $ - $2,975
$ 6,754 $ 49,336 $ 60,540 $116,630 $ 6,889 $ 49,437 $ 61,554 $117,880 $ 5,833 $ 42,642 $ 52,326 $100,800 $ 5,950 $ 42,729 $ 53,202 $101,881 $ 1,363 $ - $ - $1,363 $ 1,390 $ - $ - $1,390
$ 847 $ 6,199 $ 7,606 $14,652 $ 863 $ 6,211 $ 7,734 $14,809 $ 4,891 $ 17,877 $ 21,937 $44,705 $ 4,988 $ 17,914 $ 22,305 $45,207 $ 6,092 $ 22,249 $ 27,301 $55,641 $ 6,214 $ 22,294 $ 27,758 $56,266 $ 2,733 $ 9,979 $ 12,245 $24,957 $ 2,788 $ 10,000 $ 12,450 $25,238 $ 3,114 $ 11,369 $ 13,950 $28,433 $ 3,176 $ 11,392 $ 14,184 $28,752 $ 6,032 $ - $ - $6,032 $ 6,152 $ - $ - $6,152
$ 3,319 $ 24,260 $ 29,770 $57,349 $ 3,386 $ 24,310 $ 30,268 $57,964 $ 483 $ - $ - $483 $ 493 $ - $ - $493
$ 10,096 $ 73,794 $ 90,552 $174,442 $ 10,298 $ 73,945 $ 92,069 $176,312 $ 4,383 $ - $ - $4,383 $ 4,470 $ - $ - $4,470
$ 9,664 $ - $ - $9,664 $ 9,857 $ - $ - $9,857
$ 4,903 $ - $ - $4,903 $ 5,001 $ - $ - $5,001
$ 5,033 $ 18,414 $ 22,595 $46,043 $ 5,134 $ 18,452 $ 22,974 $46,559 $ 2,185 $ - $ - $2,185 $ 2,229 $ - $ - $2,229
$ 8,101 $ 29,591 $ 36,310 $74,002 $ 8,263 $ 29,651 $ 36,919 $74,833 $ 4,445 $ 16,243 $ 19,932 $40,620 $ 4,534 $ 16,276 $ 20,265 $41,076 $ 3,485 $ 25,464 $ 31,247 $60,196 $ 3,555 $ 25,516 $ 31,770 $60,842 $ 9,555 $ 69,810 $ 85,664 $165,029 $ 9,746 $ 69,953 $ 87,099 $166,798 $ 2,101 $ - $ - $2,101 $ 2,143 $ - $ - $2,143
$ 9,031 $ 32,980 $ 40,470 $82,481 $ 9,212 $ 33,048 $ 41,148 $83,407 $ 2,184 $ 15,975 $ 19,603 $37,761 $ 2,227 $ 16,008 $ 19,931 $38,166 $ 4,872 $ 35,589 $ 43,671 $84,132 $ 4,969 $ 35,662 $ 44,402 $85,033 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 4,872 $ 35,589 $ 43,671 $84,132 $ 4,969 $ 35,662 $ 44,402 $85,033 $ 18,104 $ 132,314 $ 162,361 $312,779 $ 18,466 $ 132,585 $ 165,081 $316,132 $ 6,211 $ 22,716 $ 27,875 $56,803 $ 6,336 $ 22,763 $ 28,342 $57,440 $ 1,080 $ - $ - $1,080 $ 1,102 $ - $ - $1,102
$ 6,509 $ 23,768 $ 29,165 $59,442 $ 6,639 $ 23,817 $ 29,654 $60,110 $ 1,510 $ 11,025 $ 13,529 $26,063 $ 1,540 $ 11,048 $ 13,755 $26,343 $ 474 $ - $ - $474 $ 484 $ - $ - $484
$ 4,218 $ 15,397 $ 18,893 $38,508 $ 4,302 $ 15,428 $ 19,210 $38,940 $ 2,592 $ - $ - $2,592 $ 2,643 $ - $ - $2,643
$ 8,720 $ 31,843 $ 39,074 $79,636 $ 8,894 $ 31,908 $ 39,728 $80,530 $ 2,139 $ 7,840 $ 9,621 $19,600 $ 2,182 $ 7,856 $ 9,782 $19,820 $ 3,005 $ - $ - $3,005 $ 3,066 $ - $ - $3,066
$ 1,640 $ 6,008 $ 7,372 $15,020 $ 1,673 $ 6,020 $ 7,495 $15,188 $ 4,657 $ - $ - $4,657 $ 4,750 $ - $ - $4,750
$ 3,191 $ - $ - $3,191 $ 3,255 $ - $ - $3,255
$ 3,612 $ 26,411 $ 32,408 $62,430 $ 3,684 $ 26,465 $ 32,951 $63,100 $ 6,941 $ - $ - $6,941 $ 7,080 $ - $ - $7,080
$ 29,807 $ - $ - $29,807 $ 30,403 $ - $ - $30,403$ 2,435 $ - $ - $2,435 $ 2,484 $ - $ - $2,484 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28
$ 39,491 $ 288,514 $ 354,032 $682,037 $ 40,281 $ 289,105 $ 359,963 $689,348 $ 334,016 $ 2,447,667 $ 3,003,510 $5,785,193 $ 340,696 $ 2,452,680 $ 3,053,823 $5,847,200$ 5,316 $ - $ - $5,316 $ 5,423 $ - $ - $5,423 $ 2,996 $ 21,890 $ 26,861 $51,748 $ 3,056 $ 21,935 $ 27,311 $52,302 $ 1,935 $ - $ - $1,935 $ 1,974 $ - $ - $1,974
$ 3,991 $ 29,184 $ 35,811 $68,986 $ 4,071 $ 29,244 $ 36,411 $69,726 $ 5,636 $ 41,184 $ 50,536 $97,356 $ 5,749 $ 41,268 $ 51,383 $98,399 $ 5,397 $ 39,434 $ 48,390 $93,221 $ 5,505 $ 39,515 $ 49,200 $94,220 $ 8,559 $ - $ - $8,559 $ 8,730 $ - $ - $8,730
$ 32,055 $ - $ - $32,055 $ 32,696 $ - $ - $32,696$ 1,846 $ 6,752 $ 8,285 $16,882 $ 1,883 $ 6,765 $ 8,424 $17,072 $ 4,360 $ - $ - $4,360 $ 4,447 $ - $ - $4,447
$ 13,234 $ 96,727 $ 118,693 $228,654 $ 13,499 $ 96,925 $ 120,681 $231,105 $ 5,770 $ - $ - $5,770 $ 5,885 $ - $ - $5,885
$ 14,086 $ 51,472 $ 63,161 $128,718 $ 14,367 $ 51,577 $ 64,219 $130,163 $ 5,440 $ - $ - $5,440 $ 5,549 $ - $ - $5,549
$ 5,431 $ 39,671 $ 48,680 $93,782 $ 5,540 $ 39,752 $ 49,496 $94,788 $ 1,262 $ - $ - $1,262 $ 1,288 $ - $ - $1,288
$ 4,423 $ - $ - $4,423 $ 4,511 $ - $ - $4,511
$ 4,932 $ - $ - $4,932 $ 5,030 $ - $ - $5,030
$ 1,961 $ 7,163 $ 8,790 $17,914 $ 2,000 $ 7,178 $ 8,937 $18,116 $ 3,328 $ 24,312 $ 29,833 $57,473 $ 3,395 $ 24,362 $ 30,333 $58,089 $ 1,611 $ 11,785 $ 14,461 $27,857 $ 1,643 $ 11,809 $ 14,703 $28,156 $ 23,914 $ - $ - $23,914 $ 24,392 $ - $ - $24,392$ 2,903 $ 10,626 $ 13,039 $26,568 $ 2,961 $ 10,648 $ 13,258 $26,867 City of Santa Monica $ 7,343 $ 53,638 $ 65,819 $126,800 $ 7,490 $ 53,748 $ 66,921 $128,159 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 7,343 $ 53,638 $ 65,819 $126,800 $ 7,490 $ 53,748 $ 66,921 $128,159 $ 9,522 1,302 $ 11,685 $ $22,509 $ 1,328 $ 9,542 $ 11,881 $22,751 $ 1,151 $ 4,206 $ 5,161 $10,517 $ 1,174 $ 4,214 $ 5,247 $10,635 $ 1,845 $ - $ - $1,845 $ 1,882 $ - $ - $1,882
$ 7,349 $ 26,835 $ 32,929 $67,112 $ 7,496 $ 26,890 $ 33,480 $67,866 $ 2,304 $ 16,839 $ 20,663 $39,806 $ 2,351 $ 16,873 $ 21,009 $40,233 $ 3,049 $ - $ - $3,049 $ 3,110 $ - $ - $3,110
$ 13,336 $ 97,456 $ 119,587 $230,380 $ 13,603 $ 97,656 $ 121,591 $232,849 $ 1,105 $ 23,081 $ 28,323 $52,509 $ 1,127 $ 23,129 $ 28,797 $53,053 $ 3,731 $ - $ - $3,731 $ 3,806 $ - $ - $3,806
$ 9,964 $ 72,819 $ 89,355 $172,138 $ 10,163 $ 72,968 $ 90,852 $173,983 $ 1,681 $ - $ - $1,681 $ 1,714 $ - $ - $1,714
$ 8,374 $ 30,603 $ 37,553 $76,530 $ 8,541 $ 30,666 $ 38,182 $77,389 $ 399,410 $ 4,937,083 $ 6,058,250 $11,394,742 $ 407,398 $ 4,947,194 $ 6,159,735 $11,514,328 $ 587 $ 2,143 $ 2,630 $5,361 $ 599 $ 2,148 $ 2,674 $5,421 $ 30,564 $ 223,019 $ 273,664 $527,248 $ 31,176 $ 223,476 $ 278,249 $532,900 $ 2,078 $ 15,165 $ 18,608 $35,851 $ 2,120 $ 15,196 $ 18,920 $36,235 $ 1,848 $ - $ - $1,848 $ 1,885 $ - $ - $1,885
$ 6,870 $ - $ - $6,870 $ 7,007 $ - $ - $7,007
$ 5,270 $ - $ - $5,270 $ 5,376 $ - $ - $5,376
$ 1,700 $ - $ - $1,700 $ 1,734 $ - $ - $1,734
$ 5,034 $ - $ - $5,034 $ 5,135 $ - $ - $5,135
$ 758 $ - $ - $758 $ 773 $ - $ - $773
$ 2,707 $ - $ - $2,707 $ 2,762 $ - $ - $2,762
$ 1,284,512 $ 9,407,880 $ 11,544,325 $ 22,236,717 $ 1,310,202 $ 9,427,148 $ 11,737,711 $ 22,475,061 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 3,035 $ - $ - $3,035 $ 3,095 $ - $ - $3,095
$ 7,027 $ 49,260 $ 62,588 $118,876 $ 7,168 $ 49,365 $ 63,643 $120,176 $ 6,069 $ 42,577 $ 54,096 $102,741 $ 6,190 $ 42,667 $ 55,008 $103,865 $ 1,418 $ - $ - $1,418 $ 1,446 $ - $ - $1,446
$ 881 $ 6,189 $ 7,864 $14,934 $ 898 $ 6,202 $ 7,996 $15,097 $ 5,088 $ 17,850 $ 22,679 $45,618 $ 5,190 $ 17,888 $ 23,062 $46,140 $ 6,338 $ 22,214 $ 28,225 $56,777 $ 6,465 $ 22,262 $ 28,701 $57,427 $ 2,843 $ 9,964 $ 12,660 $25,467 $ 2,900 $ 9,985 $ 12,873 $25,758 $ 3,240 $ 11,351 $ 14,422 $29,013 $ 3,305 $ 11,375 $ 14,665 $29,345 $ 6,275 $ - $ - $6,275 $ 6,401 $ - $ - $6,401
$ 3,453 $ 24,223 $ 30,777 $58,454 $ 3,522 $ 24,275 $ 31,296 $59,093 $ 503 $ - $ - $503 $ 513 $ - $ - $513
$ 10,504 $ 73,681 $ 93,616 $177,801 $ 10,714 $ 73,838 $ 95,194 $179,746 $ 4,560 $ - $ - $4,560 $ 4,651 $ - $ - $4,651
$ 10,054 $ - $ - $10,054 $ 10,255 $ - $ - $10,255
$ 5,101 $ - $ - $5,101 $ 5,203 $ - $ - $5,203
$ 5,237 $ 18,386 $ 23,360 $46,982 $ 5,341 $ 18,425 $ 23,754 $47,520 $ 2,273 $ - $ - $2,273 $ 2,319 $ - $ - $2,319
$ 8,428 $ 29,545 $ 37,539 $75,513 $ 8,597 $ 29,608 $ 38,172 $76,377 $ 4,625 $ 16,218 $ 20,606 $41,449 $ 4,717 $ 16,253 $ 20,953 $41,923 $ 3,626 $ 25,425 $ 32,304 $61,355 $ 3,698 $ 25,480 $ 32,849 $62,027 $ 9,941 $ 69,703 $ 88,562 $168,207 $ 10,140 $ 69,852 $ 90,055 $170,047 $ 2,185 $ - $ - $2,185 $ 2,229 $ - $ - $2,229
$ 9,396 $ 32,930 $ 41,839 $84,165 $ 9,584 $ 33,000 $ 42,545 $85,128 $ 2,272 $ 15,950 $ 20,266 $38,488 $ 2,317 $ 15,984 $ 20,608 $38,910 $ 5,069 $ 35,534 $ 45,149 $85,752 $ 5,170 $ 35,610 $ 45,910 $86,690 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 5,069 $ 35,534 $ 45,149 $85,752 $ 5,170 $ 35,610 $ 45,910 $86,690 $ 18,836 $ 132,111 $ 167,855 $318,802 $ 19,212 $ 132,393 $ 170,685 $322,290 $ 6,462 $ 22,681 $ 28,818 $57,962 $ 6,592 $ 22,730 $ 29,304 $58,626 $ 1,124 $ - $ - $1,124 $ 1,146 $ - $ - $1,146
$ 6,772 $ 23,731 $ 30,152 $60,656 $ 6,908 $ 23,782 $ 30,661 $61,350 $ 1,571 $ 11,008 $ 13,986 $26,565 $ 1,602 $ 11,032 $ 14,222 $26,856 $ 493 $ - $ - $493 $ 503 $ - $ - $503
$ 4,388 $ 15,373 $ 19,533 $39,294 $ 4,476 $ 15,406 $ 19,862 $39,744 $ 2,696 $ - $ - $2,696 $ 2,750 $ - $ - $2,750
$ 9,072 $ 31,794 $ 40,396 $81,262 $ 9,253 $ 31,862 $ 41,077 $82,192 $ 2,225 $ 7,828 $ 9,946 $20,000 $ 2,270 $ 7,845 $ 10,114 $20,229 $ 3,127 $ - $ - $3,127 $ 3,189 $ - $ - $3,189
$ 1,706 $ 5,998 $ 7,621 $15,326 $ 1,741 $ 6,011 $ 7,750 $15,501 $ 4,845 $ - $ - $4,845 $ 4,942 $ - $ - $4,942
$ 3,320 $ - $ - $3,320 $ 3,387 $ - $ - $3,387
$ 3,757 $ 26,370 $ 33,505 $63,632 $ 3,833 $ 26,426 $ 34,070 $64,329 $ 7,221 $ - $ - $7,221 $ 7,366 $ - $ - $7,366$ 31,011 $ - $ - $31,011 $ 31,631 $ - $ - $31,631 $ 2,534 $ - $ - $2,534 $ 2,584 $ - $ - $2,584
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30
$ 288,071 41,086 $ $ 366,012 $695,170 $ 41,908 $ 288,686 $ 372,183 $702,777 $ 347,510 $ 2,443,913 $ 3,105,143 $5,896,567 $ 354,460 $ 2,449,129 $ 3,157,490 $5,961,079 $ 5,531 $ - $ - $5,531 $ 5,642 $ - $ - $5,642
$ 3,117 $ 21,857 $ 27,770 $52,744 $ 3,180 $ 21,903 $ 28,238 $53,321 $ 2,013 $ - $ - $2,013 $ 2,053 $ - $ - $2,053
$ 4,153 $ 29,139 $ 37,023 $70,315 $ 4,236 $ 29,201 $ 37,647 $71,084 $ 5,864 $ 41,121 $ 52,246 $99,230 $ 5,981 $ 41,208 $ 53,127 $100,316 $ 5,615 $ 39,374 $ 50,027 $95,016 $ 5,727 $ 39,458 $ 50,870 $96,055 $ 8,905 $ - $ - $8,905 $ 9,083 $ - $ - $9,083
$ 33,350 $ - $ - $33,350 $ 34,017 $ - $ - $34,017
$ 1,920 $ 6,741 $ 8,565 $17,227 $ 1,959 $ 6,756 $ 8,710 $17,424 $ 4,536 $ - $ - $4,536 $ 4,627 $ - $ - $4,627
$ 13,769 $ 96,578 $ 122,709 $233,056 $ 14,045 $ 96,785 $ 124,777 $235,607 $ 6,003 $ - $ - $6,003 $ 6,123 $ - $ - $6,123
$ 14,655 $ 51,393 $ 65,298 $131,345 $ 14,948 $ 51,503 $ 66,399 $132,849 $ 5,660 $ - $ - $5,660 $ 5,773 $ - $ - $5,773
$ 5,650 $ 39,610 $ 50,327 $95,588 $ 5,763 $ 39,695 $ 51,176 $96,634 $ 1,313 $ - $ - $1,313 $ 1,340 $ - $ - $1,340
$ 4,601 $ - $ - $4,601 $ 4,694 $ - $ - $4,694
$ 5,131 $ - $ - $5,131 $ 5,234 $ - $ - $5,234
$ 2,040 $ 7,152 $ 9,087 $18,280 $ 2,081 $ 7,168 $ 9,241 $18,489 $ 3,462 $ 24,275 $ 30,842 $58,579 $ 3,532 $ 24,326 $ 31,362 $59,220 $ 1,676 $ 11,767 $ 14,950 $28,393 $ 1,710 $ 11,792 $ 15,202 $28,704$ 24,880 $ - $ - $24,880 $ 25,377 $ - $ - $25,377 $ 3,021 $ 10,610 $ 13,480 $27,111 $ 3,081 $ 10,632 $ 13,708 $27,421 City of Santa Monica $ 7,640 $ 53,556 $ 68,046 $129,241 $ 7,792 $ 53,670 $ 69,193 $130,656 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 7,640 $ 53,556 $ 68,046 $129,241 $ 7,792 $ 53,670 $ 69,193 $130,656 $ 1,355 $ 9,508 $ 12,080 $22,943 $ 1,382 $ 9,528 $ 12,284 $23,194 $ 1,197 $ 4,199 $ 5,335 $10,732 $ 1,221 $ 4,208 $ 5,425 $10,854 $ 1,919 $ - $ - $1,919 $ 1,958 $ - $ - $1,958
$ 7,646 $ 26,794 $ 34,043 $68,482 $ 7,798 $ 26,851 $ 34,617 $69,266 $ 2,398 $ 16,813 $ 21,362 $40,573 $ 2,445 $ 16,849 $ 21,722 $41,017 $ 3,172 $ - $ - $3,172 $ 3,236 $ - $ - $3,236
$ 13,875 $ 97,307 $ 123,634 $234,815 $ 14,152 $ 97,514 $ 125,718 $237,385 $ 1,149 $ 23,046 $ 29,281 $53,476 $ 1,172 $ 23,095 $ 29,775 $54,042 $ 3,882 $ - $ - $3,882 $ 3,960 $ - $ - $3,960
$ 10,366 $ 72,707 $ 92,379 $175,452 $ 10,574 $ 72,862 $ 93,936 $177,372 $ 1,749 $ - $ - $1,749 $ 1,784 $ - $ - $1,784
$ 8,712 $ 30,556 $ 38,824 $78,092 $ 8,886 $ 30,621 $ 39,478 $78,986 $ 415,546 $ 4,929,512 $ 6,263,250 $11,608,308 $ 423,857 $ 4,940,031 $ 6,368,836 $11,732,725 $ 611 $ 2,140 $ 2,719 $5,470 $ 623 $ 2,144 $ 2,765 $5,533 $ 31,799 $ 222,677 $ 282,925 $537,401 $ 32,435 $ 223,152 $ 287,694 $543,282 $ 2,162 $ 15,141 $ 19,238 $36,541 $ 2,205 $ 15,174 $ 19,562 $36,941 $ 1,923 $ - $ - $1,923 $ 1,962 $ - $ - $1,962
$ 7,147 $ - $ - $7,147 $ 7,290 $ - $ - $7,290
$ 5,483 $ - $ - $5,483 $ 5,593 $ - $ - $5,593
$ 1,768 $ - $ - $1,768 $ 1,804 $ - $ - $1,804
$ 5,238 $ - $ - $5,238 $ 5,342 $ - $ - $5,342
$ 788 $ - $ - $788 $ 804 $ - $ - $804
$ 2,817 $ - $ - $2,817 $ 2,873 $ - $ - $2,873
$ 1,336,406 $ 9,393,453 $ 11,934,965 $ 22,664,824 $ 1,363,135 $ 9,413,499 $ 12,136,164 $ 22,912,797 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El Segundo City of Gardena
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total $ 3,157 $ - $ - $3,157 $ 3,220 $ - $ - $3,220
$ 7,311 $ 49,473 $ 54,887 $111,670 $ 7,457 $ 49,582 $ 55,984 $113,024$ 6,314 $ 42,760 $ 47,440 $96,514 $ 6,440 $ 42,855 $ 48,388 $97,683$ 1,475 $ - $ - $1,475 $ 1,504 $ - $ - $1,504 $ 916 $ 6,216 $ 6,896 $14,028 $ 935 $ 6,230 $ 7,034 $14,198 $ 5,294 $ 17,927 $ 19,889 $43,109 $ 5,400 $ 17,967 $ 20,287 $43,653$ 6,594 $ 22,310 $ 24,752 $53,656 $ 6,726 $ 22,359 $ 25,247 $54,332$ 2,958 $ 10,007 $ 11,102 $24,067 $ 3,017 $ 10,029 $ 11,324 $24,370$ 3,371 $ 11,400 $ 12,648 $27,418 $ 3,438 $ 11,425 $ 12,901 $27,764$ 6,529 $ - $ - $6,529 $ 6,659 $ - $ - $6,659 $ 3,593 $ 24,328 $ 26,990 $54,910 $ 3,665 $ 24,381 $ 27,530 $55,576 $ 523 $ - $ - $523 $ 533 $ - $ - $533
$ 10,928 $ 73,998 $ 82,097 $167,023 $ 11,147 $ 74,162 $ 83,739 $169,047 $ 4,744 $ - $ - $4,744 $ 4,839 $ - $ - $4,839
$ 10,460 $ - $ - $10,460 $ 10,669 $ - $ - $10,669
$ 5,307 $ - $ - $5,307 $ 5,413 $ - $ - $5,413
$ 5,448 $ 18,465 $ 20,486 $44,399 $ 5,557 $ 18,506 $ 20,895 $44,958$ 2,365 $ - $ - $2,365 $ 2,413 $ - $ - $2,413 $ 8,769 $ 29,673 $ 32,920 $71,362 $ 8,944 $ 29,738 $ 33,578 $72,261$ 4,812 $ 16,288 $ 18,070 $39,170 $ 4,908 $ 16,324 $ 18,432 $39,664$ 3,772 $ 25,535 $ 28,329 $57,636 $ 3,848 $ 25,591 $ 28,896 $58,335 $ 10,343 $ 70,004 $ 77,665 $158,011 $ 10,550 $ 70,158 $ 79,218 $159,926 $ 2,274 $ - $ - $2,274 $ 2,319 $ - $ - $2,319
$ 9,775 $ 33,072 $ 36,691 $79,538 $ 9,971 $ 33,145 $ 37,425 $80,541$ 2,364 $ 16,019 $ 17,772 $36,155 $ 2,411 $ 16,055 $ 18,128 $36,593 $ 5,273 $ 35,687 $ 39,593 $80,554 $ 5,379 $ 35,766 $ 40,385 $81,530 FY 2030/31 FY 2031/32
City of Gardena
City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of Lawndale $ 5,273 $ 35,687 $ 39,593 $80,554 $ 5,379 $ 35,766 $ 40,385 $81,530 $ 132,680 19,597 $ $ 147,201 $299,478 $ 19,989 $ 132,974 $ 150,145 $303,107 $ 6,724 $ 22,779 $ 25,272 $54,775 $ 6,858 $ 22,830 $ 25,778 $55,465$ 1,169 $ - $ - $1,169 $ 1,193 $ - $ - $1,193 $ 7,046 $ 23,834 $ 26,442 $57,322 $ 7,187 $ 23,886 $ 26,971 $58,044$ 1,634 $ 11,055 $ 12,265 $24,955 $ 1,667 $ 11,080 $ 12,511 $25,257 $ 513 $ - $ - $513 $ 523 $ - $ - $523
$ 4,565 $ 15,439 $ 17,129 $37,134 $ 4,657 $ 15,474 $ 17,472 $37,602$ 2,805 $ - $ - $2,805 $ 2,861 $ - $ - $2,861 $ 9,438 $ 31,931 $ 35,425 $76,795 $ 9,627 $ 32,001 $ 36,134 $77,763$ 2,315 $ 7,862 $ 8,723 $18,900 $ 2,361 $ 7,880 $ 8,897 $19,138 $ 3,253 $ - $ - $3,253 $ 3,318 $ - $ - $3,318
$ 1,775 $ 6,024 $ 6,683 $14,483 $ 1,811 $ 6,038 $ 6,817 $14,666 $ 5,041 $ - $ - $5,041 $ 5,142 $ - $ - $5,142
$ 3,454 $ - $ - $3,454 $ 3,524 $ - $ - $3,524
$ 3,909 $ 26,484 $ 29,382 $59,775 $ 3,987 $ 26,542 $ 29,970 $60,500$ 7,513 $ - $ - $7,513 $ 7,663 $ - $ - $7,663 $ 32,264 $ - $ - $32,264 $ 32,909 $ - $ - $32,909
$ 2,636 $ - $ - $2,636 $ 2,689 $ - $ - $2,689
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Costs Distributed 50% Population/50% Geography for LMR, LTE, LTE Hard Match, and Baseline Admin CostMembersCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan BeachCity of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe Springs City of Santa Monica
JPA Operations LMR LTE Total JPA Operations LMR LTE Total FY 2030/31 FY 2031/32
$ 289,313 42,746 $ $ 320,975 $653,034 $ 43,601 $ 289,953 $ 327,394 $660,948 $ 361,550 $ 2,454,448 $ 2,723,057 $5,539,055 368,781 $ $ 2,459,875 $ 2,777,519 $5,606,174 $ 5,755 $ - $ - $5,755 $ 5,870 $ - $ - $5,870
$ 3,243 $ 21,951 $ 24,353 $49,547 $ 3,308 $ 21,999 $ 24,840 $50,148$ 2,095 $ - $ - $2,095 $ 2,136 $ - $ - $2,136 $ 4,320 $ 29,265 $ 32,467 $66,052 $ 4,407 $ 29,329 $ 33,117 $66,853$ 6,101 $ 41,298 $ 45,817 $93,216 $ 6,223 $ 41,389 $ 46,734 $94,345$ 5,842 $ 39,544 $ 43,871 $89,257 $ 5,959 $ 39,631 $ 44,749 $90,338$ 9,265 $ - $ - $9,265 $ 9,450 $ - $ - $9,450 $ 34,697 $ - $ - $34,697 $ 35,391 $ - $ - $35,391
$ 1,998 $ 6,770 $ 7,511 $16,279 $ 2,038 $ 6,785 $ 7,662 $16,485 $ 4,719 $ - $ - $4,719 $ 4,814 $ - $ - $4,814
$ 14,325 $ 96,995 $ 107,610 $218,930 $ 14,612 $ 97,209 $ 109,762 $221,583 $ 6,245 $ - $ - $6,245 $ 6,370 $ - $ - $6,370
$ 15,247 $ 51,614 $ 57,263 $124,124 $ 15,552 $ 51,728 $ 58,408 $125,688 $ 5,888 $ - $ - $5,888 $ 6,006 $ - $ - $6,006
$ 5,879 $ 39,781 $ 44,135 $89,794 $ 5,996 $ 39,869 $ 45,017 $90,883$ 1,366 $ - $ - $1,366 $ 1,394 $ - $ - $1,394 $ 4,787 $ - $ - $4,787 $ 4,883 $ - $ - $4,883
$ 5,338 $ - $ - $5,338 $ 5,445 $ - $ - $5,445
$ 2,123 $ 7,183 $ 7,969 $17,275 $ 2,165 $ 7,199 $ 8,129 $17,493 $ 3,602 $ 24,379 $ 27,047 $55,029 $ 3,674 $ 24,433 $ 27,588 $55,696$ 1,744 $ 11,817 $ 13,111 $26,672 $ 1,779 $ 11,844 $ 13,373 $26,996 $ 25,885 $ - $ - $25,885 $ 26,403 $ - $ - $26,403
$ 3,143 $ 10,655 $ 11,822 $25,620 $ 3,206 $ 10,679 $ 12,058 $25,943 City of Santa Monica $ 7,948 $ 53,787 $ 59,673 $121,408 $ 8,107 $ 53,906 $ 60,866 $122,879 City of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South GateCity of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West Hollywood Total
$ 7,948 $ 53,787 $ 59,673 $121,408 $ 8,107 $ 53,906 $ 60,866 $122,879 $ 9,549 1,409 $ $ 10,594 $21,552 $ 1,438 $ 9,570 $ 10,806 $21,813 $ 1,245 $ 4,217 $ 4,679 $10,141 $ 1,270 $ 4,227 $ 4,772 $10,269 $ 1,997 $ - $ - $1,997 $ 2,037 $ - $ - $2,037
$ 7,954 $ 26,909 $ 29,854 $64,718 $ 8,114 $ 26,969 $ 30,451 $65,533$ 2,494 $ 16,886 $ 18,734 $38,113 $ 2,544 $ 16,923 $ 19,108 $38,575$ 3,300 $ - $ - $3,300 $ 3,366 $ - $ - $3,366 $ 14,435 $ 97,726 $ 108,421 $220,582 $ 14,724 $ 97,942 $ 110,589 $223,256 $ 1,196 $ 23,145 $ 25,678 $50,019 $ 1,220 $ 23,196 $ 26,192 $50,608$ 4,039 $ - $ - $4,039 $ 4,119 $ - $ - $4,119 $ 10,785 $ 73,021 $ 81,012 $164,817 $ 11,001 $ 73,182 $ 82,632 $166,815 $ 1,819 $ - $ - $1,819 $ 1,856 $ - $ - $1,856
$ 9,064 $ 30,688 $ 34,046 $73,798 $ 9,245 $ 30,756 $ 34,727 $74,728 $ 432,334 $ 4,950,762 $ 5,492,561 $10,875,657 440,981 $ $ 4,961,707 $ 5,602,412 $11,005,100$ 636 $ 2,149 $ 2,384 $5,169 $ 649 $ 2,154 $ 2,432 $5,234 $ 33,084 $ 223,637 $ 248,111 $504,832 $ 33,745 $ 224,131 $ 253,073 $510,950 $ 2,249 $ 15,207 $ 16,871 $34,326 $ 2,294 $ 15,240 $ 17,208 $34,743$ 2,001 $ - $ - $2,001 $ 2,041 $ - $ - $2,041 $ 7,436 $ - $ - $7,436 $ 7,585 $ - $ - $7,585
$ 5,705 $ - $ - $5,705 $ 5,819 $ - $ - $5,819
$ 1,840 $ - $ - $1,840 $ 1,877 $ - $ - $1,877
$ 5,449 $ - $ - $5,449 $ 5,558 $ - $ - $5,558
$ 820 $ - $ - $820 $ 836 $ - $ - $836
$ 2,931 $ - $ - $2,931 $ 2,989 $ - $ - $2,989
$ 1,390,397 $ 9,433,946 $ 10,466,374 $ 21,290,718 $ 1,418,205 $ 9,454,802 $ 10,675,702 $ 21,548,709 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
APPENDIX 2 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Hard Match Distributed by 50% Population/50% Geography City of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El SegundoCity of Gardena FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833$8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235$3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563$4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434$1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989$2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897$3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237$5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573$3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 City of Gardena $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of LawndaleCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan Beach $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737$2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346$1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Hard Match Distributed by 50% Population/50% Geography City of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe SpringsCity of Santa MonicaCity of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South Gate FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816$8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208$7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428$4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845$2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City of South Gate $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348City of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West HollywoodTotal $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348$3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427
$44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Hard Match Distributed by 50% Population/50% Geography City of Agoura HillsCity of AlhambraCity of ArcadiaCity of ArtesiaCity of AvalonCity of AzusaCity of Baldwin ParkCity of BellCity of Bell GardensCity of BellflowerCity of Beverly HillsCity of BradburyCity of BurbankCity of CalabasasCity of CarsonCity of CerritosCity of ClaremontCity of CommerceCity of ComptonCity of CovinaCity of Culver CityCity of DowneyCity of DuarteCity of El MonteCity of El SegundoCity of Gardena FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 FY 2031/32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $9,833 $0 $0$8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $8,499 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $1,235 $0 $0$3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $3,563 $0 $0$4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $4,434 $0 $0$1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $1,989 $0 $0$2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $2,266 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $4,835 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $14,707 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $3,670 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $5,897 $0 $0$3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $3,237 $0 $0$5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $0 $0 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $13,913 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $6,573 $0 $0$3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $3,184 $0 $0 City of Gardena $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $0 $0City of GlendaleCity of GlendoraCity of Hawaiian GardensCity of HawthorneCity of Hermosa BeachCity of Hidden HillsCity of Huntington ParkCity of IndustryCity of InglewoodCity of IrwindaleCity of La Canada FlintridgeCity of La Habra HeightsCity of La MiradaCity of La PuenteCity of La VerneCity of LakewoodCity of LancasterCity of LawndaleCity of Long BeachCity of Los AngelesCity of LynwoodCity of Manhattan Beach $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $7,093 $0 $0
$26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $26,370 $0 $0
$4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $4,527 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $4,737 $0 $0$2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $2,197 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $3,069 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $6,346 $0 $0$1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $1,563 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $1,197 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $5,264 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $57,501 $0 $0
$487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $487,826 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $4,363 $0 $0
APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS
Funding Plan Cash FlowJune 2014
Annual Hard Match Distributed by 50% Population/50% Geography City of MaywoodCity of MonroviaCity of MontebelloCity of Monterey ParkCity of NorwalkCity of PalmdaleCity of Palos Verdes EstatesCity of ParamountCity of PasadenaCity of Pico RiveraCity of PomonaCity of Ranchos Palos VerdesCity of Redondo BeachCity of Rolling Hills EstatesCity of RosemeadCity of San DimasCity of San FernandoCity of San GabrielCity of San Marino City of Santa ClaritaCity of Santa Fe SpringsCity of Santa MonicaCity of Sierra MadreCity of Signal HillCity of South El MonteCity of South Gate FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 FY 2030/31 FY 2031/32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $5,816 $0 $0$8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $8,208 $0 $0$7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $7,859 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $1,346 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $19,278 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $10,258 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $7,907 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $1,428 $0 $0$4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $4,845 $0 $0$2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $2,118 $0 $0
$10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $10,690 $0 $0
$1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 $0 $0
$838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $838 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City of South Gate $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $0 $0City of South PasadenaCity of Temple CityCity of TorranceCity of VernonCity of WalnutCity of West CovinaCity of Westlake VillageCity of WhittierCounty of Los AngelesInglewood Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School DistrictUCLA

NON-MEMBER CITIES
City of CudahyCity of Diamond BarCity of La HabraCity of LomitaCity of MalibuCity of Rolling HillsCity of West HollywoodTotal $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $5,348 $0 $0$3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $3,356 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $19,423 $0 $0
$4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $4,600 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $14,513 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $6,099 $0 $0
$983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $983,972 $0 $0 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $427 $0 $0
$44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $44,448 $0 $0
$3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $3,022 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $1,875,012 $0 $0 APPENDIX 2

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
Appendix 3
Minutes of May 28, 2014
LA-RICS Board Meeting

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
Board of Directors

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL

INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY
May 28, 2014
Grace E. Simons Lodge
1025 Elysian Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Board Members Present:

William “'Bill” T Fujioka Chair, CEO, County of Los Angeles Kim Raney, Police Chief, City of Covina, representing At Large Seat Scott Pickwith, Police Chief, City of La Verne, representing the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association Ron Iizuka, Police Captain, City of Culver City, representing At Large Seat Mark R. Alexander, City Manager, City of La Cañada Flintridge, representing the Contract Cities Association Reginald “Reggie” Harrison, Deputy City Manager, City of Long Beach Gregory “Greg” L. Simay, Assistant General Manager, City of Burbank Water & Power, representing At Large Seat Bill Walker, Fire Chief, City of Alhambra, representing the Los Angeles Area Fire Chiefs Association LeRoy J. Jackson, City Manager, City of Torrance, representing At Large Seat Representatives For Board Members Present:

Patricia “Patty” J. Huber, representing Miguel Santana, for the City of Los Angeles Chief Administrative Office Ronnie Villanueva, representing James G. Featherstone, for the City of Los Angeles Fire Department Sandy Jo MacArthur, representing Charles “Charlie” L. Beck, Vice Chair, for the City of Los Angeles Police Department Mark J. Bennett, representing Daryl L. Osby, for the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Cathy Chidester, representing Dr. Mitchell H. Katz, for the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Matias Farfan, representing Gerry Miller, for the City of Los Angeles Chief Information Office Nancy L. Ramirez, representing Steven K. “Steve” Zipperman, for the Los Angeles School Police Department Scott Edson, representing, John Scott, for the County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department Officers Present:

Pat Mallon, LA-RICS Executive Director
Rachelle Anema, representing John Naimo, Auditor-Controller, County of Los Angeles Patricia Saucedo, Board Secretary

Absent:

Mark J. Saladino, Treasurer and Tax Collector, County of Los Angeles APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 2
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ANNOUNCE QUORUM – Roll Call
Chair Bill Fujioka made an acknowledgement that a quorum was present.

III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – (None)
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR – (None)
V. REPORTS – (1)

1. Committee Reports
a. Finance Committee – Stephen Sotomayor
Stephen Sotomayor, Chair of Finance Committee, stated the Finance Committee reviewed the LA-RICS Funding Plan last week. During this meeting the committee discussed several iterations of the Funding Plan and agreed to recommend to the JPA Board that they extend the “opt out” period to 60 days. This will allow members to move through their political processes to adopt the funding plan and to get through their respective approval authorities. The Committee discussed two alternative plans. One is to look at splitting the costs of the system based on a 50/50 split in geography and population. The other looks at the operational side based upon the number of devices that could be used on the system. The committee’s discussion mainly revolved around the idea that if the devices are used, it provides an opportunity for individuals to only put a few devices; where as a split between geography and population provides a very hard and simple formula for determining responsibility in the share of the costs. The Committee did not make an endorsement of either recommendation due to the fact that the data that was provided in your report today, wasn’t available. That item will be before you today which is that the funding plan move forward. Board Member LeRoy Jackson asked if the 50/50 split, a plan B, is a significant change in the original plan? LeRoy Jackson stated he was looking at it more as a legal question, is it a significant change that has to go back out for an additional comment period. Truc Moore, Counsel of the Authority, stated Section 5.01 of the JPA Agreement states that after the comment period has expired, the Board had several options, including (a) Adopting the Funding Plan as proposed, which was the plan that was circulated to all the Members, or (b) Revising the Funding Plan to address some or all of the Member comments. The Board can adopt Option A or B or (c) Reconsider the Funding Plan at a later date. There is no express requirement that the Board circulate the plan again. The Board is also not prohibited from doing so, but it is not expressly required in the JPA Agreement. Bill Fujioka stated, “we can make a decision today if we choose.” Counsel stated, “That’s right, you can choose to adopt today, or you can choose to circulate it.”
Board Member Mark Alexander stated, “At the last meeting I asked to look at the implications of a 365 day opt out period,” adding that he didn’t see any information related to that in the packet.

Truc Moore stated, we did look at the 365 days. A major concern, especially for LTE is, there is a grant match requirement with respect to dollars. With the longer period, you don’t have a full understanding of what the membership looks like. If the majority of the membership were to leave at the end of the 365 days (for example) then it significantly increases the liability for the remaining members. We felt the recommendation of 60 days would give all of the jurisdictions an opportunity to understand and evaluate the plan and take it to their agencies and bring it back within that time period so the JPA Board would have an understanding of how the membership will look after a 60 day period. Mark Alexander stated, that he disagreed. He didn't think 60 days is enough time for the agencies to fully understand the implications of the plan. He indicated he would be voting “No” on Adoption of the Funding Plan if we stay with the 60 day opt out period.

We need a far longer period of time to evaluate the true impacts and what the effects are in the funding plan. I am disappointed that we didn’t look at a much longer period to allow the cities, the agencies to really assess what the implications are.

APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 3
Board Member Bill Walker stated on the populations, is that calculated on the daily population? Some cities have a lot of flux, like a beach city, where you’ve got populations that change. So you might have a call volume that is similar to a city with a population of 100,000 but your day population is much less. Derek Wong, PMC, stated population is based on residential for all jurisdictions, except for Cities of Industry and Vernon in which we used a day-time population.

Originally we were looking at call volume, as a basis on use of the system. Population is another way to look at it. But if you have a population flux because you are at the beach with 100,000 people a day, your call volume is similar to a city that has a residential population with much more. Bill Fujioka stated, I want to suggest that, at a three year period (after we turn the system on) we should have some real data to look at and that we relook at the Funding Plan. We look at the actual usage for all the cities and geographic areas and where appropriate, revise it. If after three years we don’t have sufficient data, we can extend that one more year On Mark’s issue on the opt out period, we said 60 days, was there something magical about 60 days? I am going to hear a request later for 90 days. What would be the impact if we go longer? If we went 90 days, is that reasonable? Pat Mallon stated the concern with the 365 days is that over the course of the next 13 months, even if you include the month of June, we are going to be expending a significant amount of the grant funds and we have to match it at 10%. Thee concern is if you wait until 365 days and someone opts out at 365 days, those that remain may be dramatically impacted by the match requirement. Alternate Board Member Patty Huber stated, as I recall during this opt out period, none of the jurisdictions actually become obligated for any of the costs incurred during that period, correct? Pat Mallon stated correct. Ms. Huber went on to state with the 365 day period means that somebody could opt out in a year and other people have made a decision and suddenly now, somebody has to be paying cost for a year? Mark Alexander stated, I am not hard and fast on 365 days, but I am on giving the cities sufficient time to understand what the implications of this are. It may be 180 days, I don’t know. But, you just answered my question, in one respect. You said that there is a 10% match. We don’t know what that means to the Cities.

I can’t tell my contract cities what this is going to cost them to this day. So 10% of the match, what does that mean to the contract cities? To the agencies that are participating? We don’t know the answer to that.

Board Member Greg Simay stated just to answer your question Burbank, for example, has an employment population that is close to its residential population. In the Finance Committee, we always had the principal that cost drivers should pay. There are two compounding factors. One has been mentioned, however, the data was inconsistent. We didn’t have enough to really work with; and, two, we’re in the middle of a big change in public safety communications.

Communications that in the past might have been radio, voice communications, now instead, there is text communications. So, I don’t think the agencies themselves know how far that is going to evolve and a year from now what percentage will be text and what percentage will be voice. In the meantime, if the funding plan is adopted, you are forced to go with some reasonable surrogate that hopefully when you migrate from your best guess to what is actually based on hard data, it is not going to be too much of a shock. Or, if there is a substantial change there would have to be some kind of a transition period. It would be nice to know after year one, then maybe give yourself a year or two or three to gradually move this forward. Alternate Board Member MacArthur stated I agree with you. I think that your plan to reassess this after a year is a good idea.

VI. DISCUSSION ITEM (None)
APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 4
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (2–5)

2. LA-RICS PROPERTY COVERAGE INSURANCES
It is recommended that your Board:

1. Discuss the following property coverage options for the LA-RICS Joint Powers Authority (JPA):
a. Commercial Property Insurance. The Commercial Property Insurance will cover the total replacement value of property at LTE and LMR sites under Alliant Insurance Services (Alliant), who is the property insurance provider for the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA); and, b. Earthquake Insurance. The Earthquake Coverage will be for those specified sites that have been deemed by the California Department of Insurance as located in an Earthquake zone; and,
c. Emergency Vehicle Coverage. The Emergency Vehicle Coverage will cover our Site on Wheels (SOW) and our Cell on Wheels (COW) equipment;

2. Provide direction to Authority Staff as to whether the Board would like to pursue and procure each of the types of insurance coverage identified above; and,

3. If the Board would like to procure any of the types of insurance coverage identified above, delegate authority to the Executive Director to complete and maintain the CJPIA Property Schedule (Attachment A) on behalf of the Authority; take all action to procure and maintain this insurance; and, procure the property coverage at the limits specified by the Board with a not-to-exceed cost of $125,000 per year.

Pat Mallon read the details of agenda item 2.

After a very short discussion, Alternate Board Member Sandy Jo MacArthur motioned to take two out of three items, excluding the Earthquake Insurance, seconded by Alternate Board Member Ron Villanueva, the motion was approved. The Board’s consensus was unanimous.

Ayes: 17 – Raney, Pickwith, Iizuka, Alexander, Harrison, Huber, Simay, Walker, Fujioka, Villanueva, Mac Arthur, Bennett, Chidester, Farfan, Ramirez, Jackson, Edson MOTION APPROVED.

3. APPROVE SITE ACCESS AGREEMENTS WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF

DIAMOND BAR AND THE CITY OF INDUSTRY
It is recommended that your Board:
a. Find that the approval and execution of the Site Access Agreements by the LA-RICS Authority does not result in any change to the PSBN project, or to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken, and that the determination that these activities are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.25, the statutory exemption adopted specifically for the LA-RICS project, remains unchanged. b. Authorize the Executive Director to finalize and execute, substantially similar in form, one or more Site Access Agreements with the County of Los Angeles, the City of Industry and APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 5
the City of Diamond Bar. These Site Access Agreements are for the Long Term Evolution (LTE) broadband communication sites within their respective jurisdictions.

Pat Mallon read the details of agenda item 3.

Alternate Board Member Sandy Jo MacArthur, seconded by Alternate Board Member Ron Villanueva motioned to approve. The Board’s consensus was unanimous.

Ayes: 17 – Raney, Pickwith, Iizuka, Alexander, Harrison, Huber, Simay, Walker, Fujioka, Villanueva, Mac Arthur, Bennett, Chidester, Farfan, Ramirez, Jackson, Edson MOTION APPROVED.

4. APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR USE OF LOS ANGELES

REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM USER EQUIPMENT It is recommended that your Board:

Delegate authority to the Executive Director to execute MOUs with member agencies, substantially similar in form to Attachment A, which would allow LA-RICS to loan User Equipment to member agencies approved by the SHSGP Approval Authority.

Pat Mallon read the details of agenda item 4.

Board Member Mark Alexander, seconded by Board Member LeRoy Jackson motioned to approve. The Board’s consensus was unanimous.

Ayes: 17 – Raney, Pickwith, Iizuka, Alexander, Harrison, Huber, Simay, Walker, Fujioka, Villanueva, Mac Arthur, Bennett, Chidester, Farfan, Ramirez, Jackson, Edson MOTION APPROVED.

5. ADOPTION OF FUNDING PLAN
It is recommended that your Board:

1. Review the attached recommended Funding Plan options:
a. Proposed Draft Funding Plan A (See formula on Page 3 of this Staff Report) i. Joint Powers Authority Administration:
1) Distribution of 40% of Authority staff and operating costs be based on Authority Members proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50% (effective FY 2014/2015). ii. LTE System Operating Costs include additional maintenance costs for Home Subscriber Services (HSS) and the Redundant Evolved Packet Core and exclude Capital Replacement Reserve and be based on the following criteria:
1) The cost of operation during the first year of operation (FY 2015/16) is based on:
a) Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE system operational costs and fiber connectivity operational costs, if applicable, based on the average number of data devices in use.
b) Hard Match contribution be based on Authority Members proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%.

APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 6
2) The cost of operation during the second and subsequent years of operation (effective FY 2016/17) is based on:
a) Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE system operational costs and full cost of LTE system maintenance (including leased fiber connectivity, if applicable) based on the average number of data devices in use.
b) Hard Match contribution based on members proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. 3) Cost of operation during years following the extinguishment of commercial financing will continue as reflected above with the exception of Hard Match contribution.
iii. LMR System Operating Costs be based on the following criteria:
1) Consideration of LMR System Operating Costs will be the subject of a revision to the Funding Plan released prior to the activation of the system. This in consideration of:
a) Execution of the LMR contract is by Phase, with each Phase requiring approval of a Notice to Proceed by the Authority Board of Directors.
b) Sufficient funding for each Phase must be demonstrated to the Authority Board of Directors before such consideration. i) Individual Notices to Proceed may be authorized by the Board of Directors on a Site by Site basis, depending on funding availability.
ii) Any decrease or suspension in grant funding which might subject Authority Members to an increased substantial financial liability should be evaluated by the Board to determine whether a revised Funding Plan should be adopted, and if one is adopted, will trigger an additional 45 day Opt-Out Period.
iii) The LMR contract provides for termination for non-appropriation of funds, thus further protecting Authority Members from further liabilities being incurred that cannot be addressed via revision to the Funding Plan.
2) The Detailed Design of the LMR system is currently in progress. i) The inability to achieve maximum benefit from some of the designated sites is resulting in site substitution and/or additions.

This may result in an adjustment of maintenance and operating costs.
ii) Changes in LMR technology during the design phase which warrant reconfiguration of operational aspects may result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.
iii) An updated analysis of projected maintenance and operating costs may also result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.

APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 7
3) The Detailed Design of the LMR system is currently in progress. iv) The inability to achieve maximum benefit from some of the designated sites is resulting in site substitution and/or additions.

This may result in an adjustment of maintenance and operating costs.
v) Changes in LMR technology during the design phase which warrant reconfiguration of operational aspects may result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.
vi) An updated analysis of projected maintenance and operating costs may also result in a change to the costs allocated to Authority Members.
b. Proposed Draft Funding Plan B (See formula on Page 4 of this Staff Report) All cost for operation of the Authority and both LTE and LMR system costs, including system administration, hard match (LTE), operations and Maintenance and Capital Replacement (LMR) will be distributed among Authority Members based on the following cost factors:
i. Population – 50%
ii. Geography – 50%

2. Adopt Proposed Funding Plan Option A OR Option B; and,

3. Delegate Authority to the Executive Director, or his Designee, to notify Authority Members pursuant to Section 7.01 of the LA-RICS Joint Powers Agreement, of adoption of the Funding Plan, and provide a copy of the same by no later than June 2, 2014; and,

4. Designate Wednesday August 1, 2014 (60 days) as the deadline for Authority Members to submit written notice of withdrawal from the Authority, if that is their governing body's determination.

Chair Bill Fujioka stated that the Funding Plan will be revisited again after three years to make some comparisons on up-to-date-populations, to see if it is working, to see if it is equitable, and to develop options of extending the data timeline for more review. Pat Mallon followed by reading the details of agenda item 5.
[Speaker Card] Mr. Kit Fox, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, stated he appreciated the comments made from Board Member Mark Alexander and further suggested that the Board consider extending the Opt Out Period from 60 days to at least 90 days or anything longer than that.

After some discussion on this matter, Chair Bill Fujioka requested a motion to extend the Opt Out period to 180 days. Board Member Mark Alexander, seconded by Board Member LeRoy Jackson motioned to approve. The Board’s consensus was unanimous.

Ayes: 17 – Raney, Pickwith, Iizuka, Alexander, Harrison, Huber, Simay, Walker, Fujioka, Villanueva, Mac Arthur, Bennett, Chidester, Farfan, Ramirez, Jackson, Edson MOTION APPROVED.

APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES
Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority May 28, 2014 Page 8
Chair Bill Fujioka requested a motioned to approve Option B. Alternate Board Member Patty Huber, seconded by Alternate Member Sandy Jo MacArthur motioned to approve. Pat Mallon pursued a roll call for Option B of the Funding Plan, the motion was approved. The Board’s consensus was as follows:

Ayes: 12 – Webster, Pickwith, Alexander, Huber, Fujioka, Villanueva, MacArthur, Bennett, Chidester, Farfan, Ramirez, Edson
Noes: 5 – Iizuka, Harrison, Simay, Walker, Jackson
MOTION APPROVED.

VIII. CLOSED SESSION REPORT – (None)
IX. MISCELLANEOUS – (None)
X. PUBLIC COMMENTS
See [Speaker Card] noted in item 5.

XI. ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION BY THE BOARD XII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Fujioka announced adjournment of this meeting. The Board Members unanimously favored this motion and adjourned. The next Board meeting will be held on Thursday, June 5, 2014, at the Grace E.

Simons Lodge.

APPENDIX 3 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE
Appendix 4
LA-RICS User Agreement:

Subscriber

AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA-RICS)

AUTHORITY

USER AGREEMENT
FOR

SUBSCRIBERS

USER NAME
AGREEMENT NO.: LA-RICS-SUB-XX
APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARAGRAPH PAGE

1. AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES........................................................................... 2

2. USER RESPONSIBILITIES...................................................................................... 2

3. BILLING ................................................................................................................... 4

4. RIGHT TO SUSPEND AND/OR REVOKE USE OF LMR SYSTEM ........................ 5

5. RADIO PROGRAMMING ......................................................................................... 5

6. COVERAGE............................................................................................................. 6

7. TALKGROUP PRIORITY ......................................................................................... 6

8. WARRANTIES ......................................................................................................... 7

9. AGREEMENT TERM – AUTOMATIC RENEWAL ................................................... 7

10. INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE................................................................................ 7

11. DESIGNATED ADMINISTRATORS......................................................................... 8

12. NOTICES.................................................................................................................. 9

13. DISCLAIMERS....................................................................................................... 10

14. INDEPENDENT STATUS....................................................................................... 10

15. ASSIGNMENT........................................................................................................ 10

16. DEFAULT............................................................................................................... 11

17. WAIVER ................................................................................................................. 11

18. INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................ 11

29. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE .............................................. 11

20. SEVERABILITY ..................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

Page ii

PARAGRAPH PAGE

21. FACSIMILE REPRESENTATIONS........................................................................ 12

22. AMENDMENTS...................................................................................................... 12

23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT........................................................................................... 12

EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A: LA-RICS RADIO USE PROTOCOLS
EXHIBIT B: TALKGROUP DETAILS
EXHIBIT C: LMR SYSTEM RATE SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT D: LOS ANGELES COUNTY TREASURER AND TAX COLLECTOR

AUTHORIZATION FOR AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE (ACH)

CREDITS FORM
EXHIBIT E: NOTIFICATION CONTACT LIST
APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA-RICS)

USER AGREEMENT
This User Agreement ("Agreement") is hereby entered into on _________________ [DATE] by and between the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Authority, referred to herein as "Authority" and the _________________ referred to herein as "User." Together, Authority and User shall collectively be referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the LA-RICS Land Mobile Radio System (LMR System) is a countywide trunked and conventional radio system designed to provide local, state, and federal public-safety first-responders the ability to seamlessly communicate intra-agency and inter-agency across the County of Los Angeles.

WHEREAS, the LMR System operates in multiple frequency bands utilizing Project 25 digital and conventional analog technology to provide portable-on-the-hip outdoor radio coverage throughout the County of Los Angeles as depicted in coverage maps.

WHEREAS, to allow other standalone and/or "regional" systems to expand and enhance their existing coverage when roaming outside those systems coverage footprint, the LMR System is capable of linking with other P25 trunked radio systems.

WHEREAS, the LMR System is managed by the Authority and Authority is responsible for engineering, maintaining, and operating the LMR System.

WHEREAS, certain agencies like User, would like to utilize the LMR System either as subscribers who desire to utilize the LMR System for their primary radio communications ("Subscriber(s)"), or affiliates who desire to utilize the LMR System only for mutual or automatic aid ("Affiliate(s)"), and shall do so by entering into this Agreement with Authority.

WHEREAS, Authority wishes to enter into this Agreement to provide use of its LMR System for operational usage to Subscribers and Affiliates, and other LMR System users as authorized by Authority, for operational purposes.

WHEREAS, User desires to enter into this Agreement to use the LMR System, as a Subscriber, to support its mission and operations.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the Parties hereto as follows:

AGREEMENT
Under this Agreement, Authority shall provide radio communications to User through the LMR System. Such services shall be provided based solely on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

1. AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES
User will be using the LMR System as a Subscriber. Given User is a Subscriber, Authority hereby agrees:

1.1. To provide public safety LMR System radio communications service 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365/366 days a year to Subscriber.

1.2. To minimize system infrastructure down time while LMR System maintenance is performed. Planned outages for scheduled maintenance for LMR System will be addressed pursuant to Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols), in particular, Section 2 (Service Impact Outage Notifications).

1.3. To provide to Subscriber a minimum of one (1) dedicated trunked radio Talkgroup. Please refer to Exhibit B (Talkgroup Details) of this Agreement.

1.4. To charge a monthly Subscriber fee per device that has access or utilizes the LMR System, which can include radios, consoles, consolettes, modems, and other equipment (collectively hereinafter "Radio(s)").

Additionally, this includes devices that utilize the LMR System either directly or indirectly, such as smartphones with Push-to-Talk (PTT) functionality.

The total monthly cost to Subscriber will be based on the number of Radios subscribed on the LMR System by the Subscriber at the beginning of each monthly billing period pursuant to Section 3 (Billing). Please refer to Exhibit C (LMR System Rate Schedule).

1.5. Cache units are activated units on the LMR System but used as spare units by Subscriber. Subscriber's cache units will only be charged when such cache units are brought into use on the LMR System and charged in accordance with Section 1.4.

Authority will perform periodic audits of Radios used on the LMR System and will confirm with Subscriber when cache Radios have become active Radios.

2. USER RESPONSIBILITIES
User is a Subscriber and hereby agrees:

2.1. To pay Authority all fees for the LMR System services in the agreed upon timeframe defined in Section 3 (Billing) of this Agreement.

2.2. To keep Authority apprised as to the number of Subscriber Radios utilizing the LMR System. Activated Radios not removed from the LMR System by Subscriber shall continue to be charged to Subscriber at the agreed upon service rate.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

2.2.1. Subscriber shall notify Authority within fifteen (15) days if there is a change to the number of Subscriber radios set forth in Exhibit C (LMR System Rate Schedule) as referenced in Section 1.4 of this Agreement.

2.3. To program and maintain equipment operating on the LMR System to applicable FCC Title 47 Part 90 Code of Federal Regulations at:
https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-divisions/technologies-systems-andinnovation-division/rules-regulations-title-47

2.3.1. Subscriber shall be responsible for the installation, maintenance, repairs, and software upgrades required of Subscriber-owned radio equipment including dispatch consoles, base stations, mobile radios, and portable radios. If a Subscriber does not have the resources for installing, maintaining, or repairing the Subscriberowned equipment, then Subscriber may enter into a separate agreement for required services with Authority.

2.3.2. Subscriber is responsible for ensuring that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensing is maintained for Subscriber's fixed equipment operating on the LMR System frequencies.

2.4. Subscriber enters into this Agreement with the understanding and acknowledgement that Subscriber is responsible for training and educating its users regarding the proper use of Radios on the LMR System.

2.4.1. Subscriber enters into this Agreement with the understanding and acknowledgement that radio conversations conducted on the LMR System may be recorded by Authority. However, Subscriber understands and acknowledges that recording of the Subscriber's Radio audio for Subscriber's use is the responsibility of the Subscriber. For additional information regarding recording, please refer to Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols), Section 3 (Audio Logging Recorders) of this Agreement.

2.4.2. Subscriber must provide copies of Subscriber's Radio codeplugs for Authority to reference for troubleshooting purposes. Updated codeplugs shall be submitted to Authority prior to distribution of Subscriber's Radios.

2.4.3. It is Subscriber's responsibility to provide written notice to Authority Designated Administrator and/or its Designee as set forth in Section 11.2 of this Agreement, identifying any lost or stolen Radios (type of radio, serial/asset number, description of circumstances related to loss/damage) as soon as possible.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

2.4.4. It is the responsibility of Subscriber to test radio functions including, but not limited to, emergency alert, roaming, console patch, and other functions deemed necessary and critical to Subscriber's operations.

2.5. Subscriber enters into this Agreement with the understanding and acknowledgement that in order to use the trunked voice subsystem of the LMR System, Subscriber will need and use Authority approved and compatible Project 25 (P25) subscriber equipment. In addition, for 700 MHz trunked operation, Subscriber's subscriber equipment must operate in P25 Phase 2 (TDMA) mode.

2.6. Not to lease, loan, give or provide in any form Subscriber-owned equipment (i.e. Radios, dispatch consoles, consolettes, modems, and other equipment) operating on the LMR System to any third-party for their use on the LMR System without prior approval from Authority.

2.7. To observe and abide by all applicable statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, including but not limited to those of the FCC, and to operate the equipment in a reasonable manner so as not to cause undue interference with any other agency participants using the LMR System.

2.8. To keep all radio communication brief and to the point. Radio system traffic shall be limited to official business only. Subscriber is responsible for the appropriate use of the system in accordance with the Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols) to this Agreement.

2.9. Subscriber enters into this Agreement with the understanding and acknowledgment that it shall comply with and abide by all applicable operational guidelines, technical specifications, and technical requirements, including cybersecurity, pursuant to the Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols) to this Agreement, which may be updated from time to time.

2.10. Subscriber enters into this Agreement with the understanding and acknowledgment that it shall comply with and abide by all applicable LA-RICS policies related to the use of the LMR System as they are implemented. Authority will notify and provide copies to Subscriber of all such policies.

3. BILLING

3.1. If User is a Subscriber, Subscriber agrees to pay Authority monthly on the Commencement Date of this Agreement for the use of the LMR System ("Monthly Fee(s)"). The actual amount of Monthly Fees will be determined by the number of active Radios and/or radio equipment registered on the LMR System in accordance with Section 1.4 and Exhibit C (LMR System Rate Schedule) of this Agreement.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

3.2. Payment of Monthly Fees for Subscribers using the LMR System will be electronically transferred from Subscriber to Authority. The Subscriber is required to complete Section 2 of Exhibit D (County of Los Angeles Treasurer and Tax Collector Authorization for Automated Clearing House (ACH) Credits Form) and share a copy of the confirmation letter from Treasurer and Tax Collector (TTC) for account establishment prior to Commencement Date of this Agreement.

3.3. Subscriber will be billed monthly in arrears. Subscriber shall schedule the payment of invoices to Authority no later than thirty (30) days after receipt of said invoice. If errors are found in the invoice or Subscriber disputes the invoice charges or services rendered, Subscriber shall immediately notify Authority in writing. Partial payment of an invoice without Authority's approval is prohibited. Subscriber's failure to make timely payments in compliance with this section may result in action as defined in Section 4 (Right to Suspend and/or Revoke Use of LMR System).

3.4. It is Subscriber's responsibility to inform Authority of any changes in service, Radio counts, etc. in accordance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement.

4. RIGHT TO SUSPEND AND/OR REVOKE USE OF LMR SYSTEM

4.1. If User is a Subscriber, Authority reserves the right to suspend and/or revoke Subscriber's ability to add/remove equipment, modify existing service or add a new service should Subscriber fail to make timely payment to Authority for the services rendered. If Subscriber fails to make any payment or fails to perform as required by any other provision hereunder, Subscriber will be notified in writing of the violation. Subscriber must correct the violation within 30 days of notice, or Authority may suspend and/or revoke Subscriber's service.

4.2. Notwithstanding the above, regardless of whether User is a Subscriber or Affiliate, Authority shall have the right to immediately suspend and/or revoke User's ability to use the LMR System, add/remove Radios, modify existing service or add a new service at any time if User fails to use the LMR System in accordance with rules and regulations of the FCC or if User fails to use the LMR System in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, including the terms of this Agreement, Authority policies or attachments thereto.

5. RADIO PROGRAMMING

5.1. All User's Radios shall be programmed for use on the LMR System in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement.

System-soft keys may be provided, in the Authority's sole discretion, to User or independent private service shops providing a programming service to Users for radio programming of the LMR System frequencies into Users APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

owned equipment (i.e. Radios, dispatch consoles, consolettes, modems, and other equipment). System-soft key requests must be made in writing to Authority. User hereby agrees that system-soft keys will be surrendered immediately, if requested by Authority.

6. COVERAGE

6.1. The LMR System operates in multiple frequency spectrum utilizing Project 25 Phase I and II, and conventional analog technology to provide portableon-the-hip outdoor radio coverage throughout the County of Los Angeles as depicted in coverage maps. User understands and agrees that 100 percent coverage of any area at all times is unrealistic and improbable. Testing and experience with actual field conditions indicate adverse propagation conditions can occur from both natural and man-made conditions. User understands and agrees that such events are beyond the reasonable control of Authority.

6.2 User further understands and agrees that Authority is not providing a warranty of coverage for the LMR System.

7. TALKGROUP PRIORITY
User understands and agrees that it may experience limited or no access to the LMR System during an emergency Talkgroup activation. To ensure that first responders have access to the LMR System during normal and emergency situations, Talkgroup access has been prioritized as follows, where User can confer with Authority on Talkgroup priority, but it will be ultimately determined by Authority and the Authority may change priorities during an unusual occurrence, emergency, or disaster:

7.1. Priority One – Emergency
Used only for Emergency Alert/Trigger calls given Priority 1 status automatically by the LMR System's controllers.

7.2. Priority Two – Life Safety and Protection of Life and Property Used for Talkgroups that have an impact on the delivery of services that involve the safety and the protection of life and property, including those Talkgroups used by personnel involved in high risk and mission critical field operations, inclusive of mutual aid Talkgroups.

7.3. Priority Three – Extraordinary/Temporary
Used for temporary re-prioritization (via system manager terminal) of a lower priority Talkgroup for critical operations (i.e., presidential motorcade, major incident command). In addition, Priority 3 is assigned to dedicated "EMERGENCY ALARM" Talkgroups for agencies such as transit that do not use the Emergency Alert (emergency button) function.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

7.4. Priority Four – Medical Priority
Used exclusively for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers to communicate with hospitals and/or the Medical Alert Center (MAC) for coordination of patient care and destinations.

7.5. Priority Five – Non-Mission Critical
Used for all other "secondary", "administrative", "non-essential" or "nonmission critical" Talkgroups used by Subscriber agencies, both public safety and general government.

7.6. Additional Priority Levels As Needed – Unassigned
Additional priority levels will be assigned by the Authority, in its sole discretion, as needed.

8. WARRANTIES
Authority warrants that its management and operation of the LMR System will comply with reasonable and standard industry practices.

9. AGREEMENT TERM – AUTOMATIC RENEWAL

9.1. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year or for the portion of the year commencing on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall automatically renew on July 1st each year thereafter. This Agreement shall automatically extend under the terms and conditions, rates, and charges then in effect for successive one (1) year periods.

9.2. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving to the other party written notice at least ninety (90) days prior to the desired termination date.

9.3. If User is a Subscriber, the rates, charges, and fees due and payable by Subscriber for any annual extension shall be the same as those during the preceding term unless Authority notifies Subscriber of any changes in the rates, charges, or fees. If, after such notification, Subscriber does not terminate this Agreement and allows it to automatically renew, charges for the next term shall be at the new rates, charges, and fees set out by Authority in its notification prior to the automatic renewal date.

10. INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE
Authority shall not be liable to User, whether a Subscriber or Affiliate, or any other person for any loss of service or damage resulting therefrom, regardless of the cause. Authority does not assume and shall have no liability under this Agreement for failure to provide, or delay in providing, service due directly or indirectly to APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

causes beyond the control of Authority or its contractors and subcontractors, including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of Governmental entities, acts of the public enemy, strikes, or severe weather conditions.

11. DESIGNATED ADMINISTRATORS

11.1. The User official specified in this Section 11 (Designated Administrators) is hereby designated as the contact officer for all matters relating to the User's performance of its obligations under this Agreement. Authority shall not take direction from any User's employee or official other than the contact officer (or his/her designee).
 User Designated Administrator:

Agency Name
Administrator Name
Address
Email
Phone number
 User Designated Administrator Designee:

Agency Name
Administrator Designee Name
Address
Email
Phone number

11.2. The contact officer for all matters relating to Authority's performance of its obligations under this Agreement shall be the Executive Director (or his/her designee) as outlined in this Section 11.2.
 Authority Designated Administrator:

LA-RICS
Scott Edson, LA-RICS Executive Director
2525 Corporate Place, Suite 100
Monterey Park, CA 91754
[email protected]
(323) 881-8281
 Authority Designated Administrator Designee:

LA-RICS
Ronald Watson, Deputy Executive Director
2525 Corporate Place, Suite 100
Monterey Park, CA 91754
[email protected]
(323) 881-8296
APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

 LMR System Manager

LA-RICS
Ted Pao
2525 Corporate Place, Suite 200
Monterey Park, CA 91754
[email protected]
(323) 881-8028

11.3. In the event of a dispute between the Parties to this Agreement as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the minimum level or manner of performance of such deployment, the User shall be consulted and a mutual determination thereof shall be made by both the User and Authority.

11.4. Authority, in an unresolved dispute, shall have final and conclusive determination as between the Parties hereto.

12. NOTICES

12.1. Notices desired or required to be given pursuant to this Agreement or by any law shall be provided in the manner pursuant to this Section 12 (Notices), which may be updated from time to time.

12.2. Unless otherwise specified herein, all notices, requests, demands, or other communications required or permitted to be given or made under this Agreement shall be in writing, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit E (Notification Contact List). Notice will be sufficiently given for all purposes as follows:
a. Personal delivery. When personally delivered to the recipient, notice is effective on delivery.
b. First Class mail. When mailed first class to the last known address of the recipient, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.
c. Certified mail. When mailed certified, return receipt requested, notice is effective on receipt, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt. d. Overnight delivery. When delivered by an overnight delivery service, charges prepaid or charged to the sender's account, notice is effective on delivery, if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service. e. Facsimile transmission. When sent by fax to the last known fax number of the recipient, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

by fax will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. or on a non-business day.
f. Email. When sent by email, notice is effective on receipt. Any notice given by email will be deemed received on the next business day if it is received after 5:00 p.m. or on a non-business day.

12.3. Any correctly addressed notice that is refused, unclaimed, or undeliverable because of an act or omission of the Party to be notified, will be deemed effective as of the first date the notice was refused, unclaimed or deemed undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service.

12.4. Addresses and persons to be notified may be changed by either Party by giving ten (10) calendar days prior written notice thereof to the other Party.

13. DISCLAIMERS

13.1 User accepts the LMR System as-is, and assumes all risks and resulting liabilities, both known or unknown to User, arising from or connected with use of the LMR System, or as it relates to any obligations, terms or conditions in this Agreement.

13.2 Authority and its member agencies in the JPA, disclaims any and all express and implied warranties, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, for the LMR System provided by this Agreement. The Authority and its member agencies in the JPA, expressly disclaims and shall not be liable to the User for any and all losses or liabilities resulting from use of the LMR System or arising from or related to any obligations, terms or conditions in this Agreement, and User hereby waives all claims and recourse against the Authority and its member agencies in the JPA, except from claims arising from, and to the extent of, the sole gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Authority, its member agencies in the JPA, its directors, officers, contractors, subcontractors, staff and agents.

14. INDEPENDENT STATUS
This Agreement is by and between User and Authority and is not intended and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association as between User and Authority.

15. ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement is personal to Authority and the User, and, in the event the User shall attempt to assign or transfer the same in whole or in part, all rights hereunder shall immediately terminate. Authority, may however, assign this Agreement to any APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

one of its member agencies in the JPA without prior consent of User, so long as such member agency agrees to perform and fulfill Authority's obligations herein.

16. DEFAULT
Parties agree that if there is any default by either Party of the terms or conditions herein contained, the non-defaulting Party may forthwith revoke and terminate this Agreement.

17. WAIVER

17.1. Any waiver by either Party of the breach of any one or more of the covenants, conditions, terms and Agreement's herein contained shall not be construed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same or of any other covenant, condition, term or Agreement herein contained, nor shall failure on the part of either Party to require exact, full, and complete compliance with any of the covenants, conditions, terms, or Agreements herein contained be construed as in any manner changing the terms of this Agreement or stopping either Party from enforcing the full provisions thereof.

17.2. No option, right, power, remedy, or privilege of either Party shall be construed as being exhausted by the exercise thereof in one or more instances. The rights, powers, options, and remedies given either Party by this Agreement shall be cumulative.

18. INTERPRETATION
Unless the context of this Agreement clearly requires otherwise: (i) the plural and singular numbers shall be deemed to include the other; (ii) the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders shall be deemed to include the others; (iii) "or" is not exclusive; and (iv) "includes" and "including" are not limiting. Further, captions and section headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement and shall not be used in construing this Agreement. Finally, this Agreement is the product of arm's length negotiation between User and Authority, where each Party has had the opportunity to receive advice from independent counsel of its own choosing. This Agreement is to be interpreted as if both Parties participated equally in its drafting and shall not construed against either Party.

19. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California for all purposes regarding this Agreement and further agree and consent that venue of any action brought hereunder shall be exclusively in the County of Los Angeles.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

20. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law.

21. FACSIMILE REPRESENTATIONS
User and Authority hereby agree to regard facsimile representations of original signatures of authorized officers of each Party, when appearing in appropriate places on the Agreement and/or amendments to the Agreement, and received via electronic mail transmission or communications facilities, as legally sufficient evidence that such original signatures have been affixed to the Agreement and/or any amendments to this Agreement, such that the Parties need not follow up facsimile transmissions of such documents with subsequent (non-facsimile) transmission of "original" versions of such documents.

22. AMENDMENTS
All changes, modifications, or amendments to this Agreement must be in the form of a written Amendment duly executed by authorized representatives of Authority and User.

23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols), Exhibit B (Talkgroup Details), Exhibit C (LMR System Rate Schedule), Exhibit D (Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector Authorization for Automated Clearing House (ACH) Credits Form), Exhibit E (Notification Contact List), and any executed Amendments, between the Parties hereto, and no addition or modification of any terms or provisions shall be effective unless set forth in writing, signed by both User and Authority.
(Signature Page – following page)
APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

LA-RICS USER AGREEMENT
USER – User Agreement No.

WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the Parties hereto as of date written below:

LOS ANGELES

REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM

AUTHORITY
Name and Title
Signature Date
USER
Name and Title
Signature Date
APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT A

LA-RICS RADIO USE PROTOCOLS
This purpose of this exhibit is to set forth the protocols the User will adhere to when using the LMR System.

1. GENERAL USE PROTOCOLS

1.1 Misuse of the LMR System will be reported to Authority’s LMR System Manager to handle directly with the User department head, or his/her designee. The reporting party's contact information should be provided in the notification. Profanity, playing music, personal conversations, intentional jamming, activities not directly related to public safety operations or any violation of the rules of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will not be permitted on the LMR System.

1.2 While using the LMR System, Users' users should follow proper radio etiquette by keeping conversations concise, brief, and clear.

1.3 Users utilizing the LMR System must abide by all FCC regulations as codified in the US Code Title 47, Part 90 (47CFR90), Land Mobile Communications.

2. SERVICE IMPACT OUTAGE NOTIFICATIONS

2.1 Purpose or Objective
Establishes the notification procedure prior to system upgrades.

2.2 Protocol/Standard
System software upgrades will be performed based on the LA-RICS System Upgrade Agreement (SUA) with service provider and when determined by LA-RICS to best implement the upgrade(s). System services patches are performed per service provider recommendation.

All Users using the System will be notified at least thirty (30) days prior to a major system upgrade that will cause a system or site outage. Any User must notify LA-RICS in writing within ten (10) days of notification if this would interfere with any major planned events or exercises.

Scheduled system repairs, and patches impacting services to Users shall be coordinated 72 hours prior to the start of work by LMR System Manager's written notification. Unplanned outages impacting services shall be notified by the LA-RICS LMR NOC to impacted user agencies in accordance with the established Emergency Change process.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT A

All Users using the System must have governance agreements in place to address the timing of system upgrades.

2.3 Recommended Procedure
The LA-RICS NOC shall be responsible for distributing a written notification or email to all Users contacts listed in Exhibit E (Notification Contact List) that may be impacted by the upgrade.

3. AUDIO LOGGING RECORDERS

3.1 Purpose or Objective
Establishes the procedure for the use and access of system audio logging devices.

3.2 Technical Background
A System Audio Logging Recorder allows all voice radio traffic to be recorded and stored for future reference.

All Talkgroups are recorded and maintained by LA-RICS for a period of not less than ninety (90) days. A Talkgroup does not need to be selected or active at a console position to be recorded.

Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encrypted calls are recorded, however, if the encryption key is not installed into the system, those recordings are unusable until the key is provided.

3.3 Protocol/Standard
User understands and acknowledges that recording of the User's radio audio for User's use is the responsibility of the User. The LA-RICS recording system will record all voice traffic. User will have access to those recordings for a period of ninety (90) days. After ninety (90) days, the recordings may be overwritten. If a User needs access to their Talkgroup recordings for a period longer than ninety (90) days, the User must download and store their own recordings.

Users directly requesting a copy, or if requesting a copy on behalf of a Public Records Access request, of any LA-RICS logged radio traffic for a Talkgroup, or channel other than their own should make their request to their respective agency Administrator managing the logging system. The agency Administrator can forward the request to the LMR System Manager as appropriate. The request should include specific information detailing the Talkgroup/channel, radio user(s), radio ID, time of day, and any other information that would help in processing the request.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT A

Users shall operate their own logging recorders that meet their business and recording retention policy requirements.

Each User utilizing logging recorders to record audio from their agency's Talkgroups is responsible for adhering to their internal procedures with regard to:
 Retention schedule for radio system recordings in compliance with State Records Retention requirements
 Responding to public records requests for copies of audio recordings for radio traffic on THEIR agency-owned Talkgroups or channels  Providing radio system recordings as requested by the judicial system  Providing duplicate recordings upon request for internal User use, investigative purposes, training, etc.
 Establishing a data storage and backup system for radio system audio recordings

3.4 Procedure
Requests for audio records should be directed to the specific agency Administrator managing the logging system.

3.5 Management
The LMR System Manager is responsible for this policy. Each User is responsible for the operation and data back-up of their agency-owned logging system for their agency-owned Talkgroups or interoperability Talkgroups on their radio console. Shared, non-owned Talkgroups are the responsibility of any User that uses it for a resource on their dispatch console.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT B

TALKGROUP DETAILS
(Talkgroup Details to be negotiated with Subscriber prior to execution of Agreement) Parties shall agree on the specific Subscriber Talkgroup details prior to execution of the Agreement. Such Talkgroup details shall be consistent with the Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols) as follows:

1. Talkgroups will be assigned, activated, and deactivated by the Authority based on Subscriber need and available system resources.

2. Such Talkgroups shall adhere to standardized and common naming conventions pursuant to Exhibit A (LA-RICS Radio Use Protocols).

3. Subscribers may only use the Talkgroup IDs assigned by Authority staff for use on the LMR System.

4. In the event that Subscriber requires additional Talkgroups beyond those allocated, Subscriber must submit a written request to the LA-RICS Help Desk set forth in this Exhibit E (Notification Contact List). Subscriber should provide reasonable justification in the written request for individual Talkgroups, along with any requires such as encryption or special functions. The request will be reviewed and Authority staff with work with Subscriber to provide additional Talkgroups if such request is approved.

5. Authority staff will monitor use of the Talkgroups allocated to Subscriber. If a Talkgroup has shown no usage in a minimum of 180 days, written notification will be sent to the Subscriber and the Talkgroup may be reclaimed.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT C

LMR SYSTEM RATE SCHEDULE

SUBSCRIBER
Monthly Rate per Device
(i.e. Radios, consoles, consolettes, modems, other equipment, including smartphones with PTT functionality) $20
Number of Subscriber's Radios (portables, mobiles, and fixed) Number of Subscriber's Consoles
Number of Subscriber's Consolettes
Number of Subscriber's Cache Radios (portables, mobiles, and fixed) Number of Subscribers Modems (Narrowband Mobile Data Network) Number of Subscriber's Other Equipment
TOTAL MONTHLY FEES:
($20 x Each Device, Radio, Console, Consolette, Cache Radio, Modem, Other Equipment, including smartphones with PTT functionality) Note: This information is being collected for billing purposes. Additional information regarding Subscriber Devices will be required at the time of provisioning.

APPENDIX 4 AGENDA ITEM H - ENCLOSURE

EXHIBIT D