Cities Index.
2022-11-14_item_5.3_p.h._to_consider_vesting_tentative_subdivision_map_for_the_alaniz_estates_project_vta-22-118

Lathrop City Council
November 14, 2022

Document
2022-11-14_item_5.3_p.h._to_consider_vesting_tentative_subdivision_map_for_the_alaniz_estates_project_vta-22-118
Meeting
November 14, 2022
Body
Lathrop City Council
Original file
3.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.ci.lathrop.ca.us. That file is the official record.

ITEM 5. 3

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING ( PUBLISHED NOTICE) TO

CONSIDER VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
VTM- 22- 118 FOR THE ALANIZ ESTATES PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Council to Consider the Following:

1. Hold a Public Hearing; and

2. Adopt a Resolution Approving Vesting Tentative
Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118) for the Proposed
Alaniz Estates Project to Create 8 Single- Family
Residential Lots.

SUMMARY:

The applicant is requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide two parcels consisting of approximately 0. 75- acres into eight individual residential lots. Parcels 1 through 7 are 3, 850 sq. ft. in size and Parcel 8 is 5, 744 sq. ft. in size. The map will serve as the basis for design and construction of future single- family homes.

The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council consider all information provided and submitted, take and consider all public testimony and, if determined to be appropriate, adopt a Resolution to approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118) for the Alaniz Estates Subdivision Project.

BACKGROUND:

The project site is located in east Lathrop on Shilling Avenue approximately 1/ 4 mile, east of Harlan Road. The property is located at the southwest corner of Shilling Avenue and Avon Avenue and is bounded on all sides by residential uses. The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of MD, Medium Density Residential and is within the RM- 3, Multi- Family Residential Zoning District. The table below lists surrounding land uses, zoning districts, and General Plan land use designations.

The project site contains two dilapidated houses that would be demolished as part of this development. The balance of the property is vacant.

On October 19, 2022 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously ( 4- 0) to recommend the City Council approve the Alaniz Estates Subdivision ( VTM- 22- 118).

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 2
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION
ANALYSIS:

As noted above, the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map proposes to subdivide the combined 0. 75- acre parcels into eight single- family residential lots.

Parcels 1 through 7 are 3, 850 sq. ft. in size and Parcel 8, on the corner, is 5, 744 sq. ft. in size. The minimum site area pursuant to Chapter 17. 36, RM Multifamily Residential District of the LMC is 6, 000 sq. ft.; however, the proposed project is located within the Historic Lathrop Overlay District ( Chapter 17. 38) which allows for the smaller and denser proposed lot sizes. . The following table provides an overview of the differences in the development standards between the RM- 3 Zoning District and the Historic Overlay District.

Development RM- 3 Zoning District Historic Overlay District Standard
Minimum Site Area 6, 000 s . ft. 2, 800 s . ft.

Width Corner 50 ft. 35 ft. 40 ft.

De th 80 ft. 80 ft.

Lot Covera e 50% 65%
Front Yard Setback
Porch 10 ft. 8 ft.

Livin Area 15 ft. 12 ft.

Gara e 20 ft. 20 ft.

Side Yard Setback
Interior Lot 5 ft. 4 ft.

Corner Lot 10 ft. 4 ft.

Rear Yard Setback 10 ft. 5 ft. / 10 ft.

The proposed project is consistent with the Historic Overlay District as follows:

Chapter 17. 38, Vesting
Historic Overlay Requirement Tentative Compliance?
District Subdivision Ma
Minimum Site Area 2, 800 sq. ft. Lots 1 - 7 = 3, 850 Yes sq. ft.

Lot 8 = 5, 744 sq.
ft.

Width ( Corner) 35 ft. ( 40 ft.) Lots 1 - 7 - 35 ft. Yes Lot 8 ( Corner) _
40 ft.

De th 80 ft. 110 ft. Yes
CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 3
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION
The remaining development standards such as Lot Coverage and Setbacks ( Front, Side and Rear Yard) will be reviewed as part of an Architectural Design Review ( ADR) to confirm that the proposed buildings meet the City' s Zoning Code requirements.

The proposed project is designed with a density of 10. 6 dwelling units per acre du/ ac), which is within the Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation requirement of 8 to 15 du/ ac.

Each lot will include a driveway accessing Shilling Avenue and will need to meet the minimum garage setback of twenty ( 20) feet. The project will be required to connect to City utilities ( water, sewer and storm drain), which are located in Shilling Avenue.

Frontage improvements such as sidewalk, curb, gutter, pavement, street lights, fire hydrants, etc. will be constructed in accordance with City Standards.

The applicant will be required to purchase wastewater capacity as well as underground overhead utility lines along the frontage of the property. Electric and natural gas service will be provided by Pacific Gas & Electric to each individual lot.

General Plan and Zoning Consistency
As currently designed and conditioned, the project is a reasonable request that is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. Specifically, the project is consistent with the following Policies:

Policy LU- 1. 3: Maintain a supply of developable lands sufficient to meet desired levels of housing, jobs, economic, educational, and recreational needs of the city over the planning horizon.

Policy LU- 1. 4 Continue to support the development of a variety of housing types and densities that meet the needs of
individuals and families, and offers residents of all income levels, age groups and special needs sufficient housing opportunities and choices.

Policy 1- 3 Preserve and protect residentially zoned sites needed to accommodate residential development consistent with the City of Lathrop RHNA through implementing the provision of the Government Code by preventing down zoning of a
residential property without a commitment for up- zoning of a comparable property.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 4
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION
Policy 1- 5 Encourage development of housing that has, to the extent possible, a support structure of shopping, services, and jobs within easy access.

The proposed project will also comply with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and design standards in the RM- 3, Multi- Family Residential Zoning District and the Historic Overlay Zoning District. The project is also consistent with the City' s Subdivision Ordinance ( Title 16) and the State Subdivision Map Act.

Conditions of A proval
Planning staff routed the project plans on August 11, 2022 and August 31, 2022 to the Building Division, Public Works Department, Lathrop- Manteca Fire District, and Lathrop Police Department to ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements. Planning staff also routed an external referral to outside agencies on August 11, 2022 and received comment letters from the following agencies:

Airport Land Use Commission ( ALUC)
Manteca Unified School District ( MUSD)
Pacific Gas & Electric ( PGE)
San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department ( SJ EHD) The ALUC letter stated that the project is compatible with the 2018 Stockton Metropolitan Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ( ALUCP) and provided standards and project design conditions to comply with the ALUCP. The MUSD letter identified the District' s plan for future school funding. As requested staff provided a copy of the letter to the applicant. The SJ EHD letter included a recommended Condition of Approval that any geotechnical drilling shall be conducted under permit and inspection by the Environmental Health Department.

Staff finds that the proposed project has been properly conditioned to meet the City' s standards and requirements.

Public Notice
A Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the Manteca Bulletin on October 28, 2022 and emailed to the list of public hearing subscribers. Staff also mailed the public hearing notice on October 31, 2022 to notify property owners located within a 300- foot radius from the project site. In addition, the meeting agenda was also posted at our designated posting locations in the City and posted on the City' s website. As of the writing of this report, no comments were received in favor or against the proposed project.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 5
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION
CEQA REVIEW:

The City finds that the proposed project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development".

The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning and regulations of the parcel, and occurs within the City limits on a project site of five ( 5) acres or less. The project is substantially surrounded by urban uses; has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; does not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, and water quality; and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measure have been required.

RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council consider all information provided and submitted, take and consider all public testimony and, if determined to be appropriate, adopt a Resolution to approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118) for the Alaniz Estates Subdivision Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All application processing fees and costs are charged to the applicant. The request has no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTAC H M E NT:

1. City Council Resolution Approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118)

2. Conditions of Approval, dated October 19, 2022

3. Vicinity Map

4. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Preliminary Development Plan

5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 22- 13
CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 6
NOVEMBER 14, 2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION
APPROVALS:

Z z.

David Niskanen Date
Contract Planner
F
b
2 icardo Caguiat Da e
Assistant Community Development Director
n z7 2.oi
M rk M iss r Da e
Commu ity Develo ment Director
D• 2.) - zoz.Z
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
v •?. • Zz
Ste Salvatore Date
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ( VTM- 22- 118) FOR

THE PROPOSED ALANIZ ESTATES SUBDIVISION PRO) ECT
WHEREAS, the City of Lathrop City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 2022 and proper public notice of this meeting was given in all respects as required by law to consider the Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM22- 118) project pursuant to the Lathrop Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the property is located at 310 and 342 Shilling Avenue ( APN: 196- 080- 34 and - 35); and
WHEREAS, the subject site is located in a Medium Density Residential ( MD) General Plan designation, Multi- Family Residential ( RM- 3) Zoning District and is within the Historic Overlay District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development". This exemption is for a project that is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and applicable Zoning designation and regulations, occurs within City limits on a project site of five ( 5) acres or less substantially surrounded by urban uses, has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, and water quality and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services; and
WHEREAS, by Adopting Resolution No. 21- 4923 based on substantial evidence in the record, City Council, acting as the leas agency, adopted Adequate Progress Findings toward providing a 200- year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Reclamation District 17 basin by the year 2028; and
WHEREAS, the requirements and conditions of this resolution are reasonable in preserving, protecting, providing for, and fostering the health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry in general, and the persons who work in or visit the development in particular; and
WHEREAS, section 16. 12. 050 of the Lathrop Municipal Code mandates the Planning Commission transmittal of a recommendation to the City Council by Resolution.

On October 19, 2022 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously ( 4- 0) to recommend the City Council approve the Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all written evidence and oral testimony presented to date.

Resolution No. 22- Page 1 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following findings:

1. The location of the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the zoning code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for the RM Multifamily Residential District and Historic Overlay District Zoning District. The use is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the City.

2. The proposed project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 17. 36 and Chapter 17. 38 of the Lathrop Municipal Code. As conditioned, the project will also comply with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and various federal, state and local standards applicable to the project. The Conditions of Approval address Planning, Building, and Fire Department requirements.

3. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Variance are exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 In- Fill Development".

4. The City Council, acting as the land use agency, adopted Resolution No. 21- 4923 based on substantial evidence in the record, adopted Adequate Progress Findings towards providing a 200- year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Reclamation District 17 basin by the year 2028.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following findings regarding the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map per Government Code Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act:

1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed map is a residential subdivision that implements the land use objectives in the Lathrop General Plan.

2. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. As conditioned, the design of the map and proposed utility and improvements are consistent with the requirements of the General Plan.

All required improvements are conditioned to comply with the City' s standards and specifications.

3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed residential development. The site is designated as Medium Density Residential land use in the General Plan.

The applicant and stafF have worked closely to ensure the map and its conditions of approval address public infrastructure and public services for the development of the propose residential development.

Resolution No. 22- Page 2 of 4

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, The Lathrop General Plan identifies the project area to allow for residential development. The map satisfies the Medium Density requirement at 10. 6 units per acre ( range is 8- 15 units per acre) and meets the minimum standards for lot widths and lot depths. Development of the site will comply with the requirements set forth in the Lathrop Municipal Code Development Standards.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. As stated above the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development."

6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems. The development of the project would not involve a range of potentially significant effects on public health and safety. As stated above the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development."

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the subdivision does not conflict with any public easements for access through or use of property within the subdivision. Conditions of approval are included to dedicate land, right of way and to provide easements where necessary for public access, utilities, and infrastructure.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings, its findings above and pursuant to its independent review and consideration, does hereby approve the Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map ( VTM- 22- 118), subject to the Consolidated Conditions of Approval dated October 19, 2022 listed as Attachment # 2 of the Staff Report for this item, incorporated by reference herein.

Resolution No. 22- Page 3 of 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop at a regular meeting on the 14t" day of November, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

SONNY DHALIWAL, MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Resolution No. 22- Page 4 of 4
City of
L .--
Community Development Department — Planning Division
Consolidated Conditions of Approval
October 19, 2022
Project Name: Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map File Number: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. VTM- 22- 118 Project Address: 310 and 342 Shilling Avenue (APNs: 196- 080- 34 and - 35) The following list of conditions shall be incorporated into the final construction plans and development phases of the project.

The list of conditions are not intended to be all-inclusive or a comprehensive listing of all Ciry or district regulations. Please note that additional comments and/ or conditions may be added pending the response to the comments noted below and/ or changes to the proposed project. The foUowing comments arid conditions of approval are based on the exhibits and diagrams dated June 29, 2022.

DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide two( 2) parcels consisting of approximately 0.75- acres into eight ( 8) individual residential lots. Parcels 1 through 7 are 3, 850 sq. ft. in size and Parcel 8 is 5, 744 sq. ft. in size. The map will serve as the basis for design and construction of future single-family homes.

PLANNING
CEQA Determination
The City finds that the project is Categorically Exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development". In this regard, the proposed project it is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations of the parcel, and occurs within the City limits and is no more than 5- acres. The project site is substantially surrounded by urban uses; has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; does not result in any significant effect relating to traffic, noise, air and water quality; and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measure have been required.

1. The applicant shall contact the Finance Department to process the assessment apportionment or pay off the outstanding assessment prior to final map recordation.

2. Future development of the parcel shall comply with the development standards for Multifamily Residential Detached Units( MFD Small Lots) per Section 17. 38.090 of the Lathrop Municipal Code LMC).

3. Prior to any ground disturbance, the project shall consult with the San Joaquin County Multi- Species Habitat Conversation and Open Space Plan ( SJMSCP) for biological coverage, mitigation and participation in the plan. Participation in the SJMSCP satisfies requirements for both the State and Federal endangered species acts, and ensures that the impact are mitigated below a level of significance in compliance with the Califarnia Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA). lofS E ., ,

4. The applicant shall coordinate with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District to comply with District rules and regulations including but not limited to Rule 8021, Dust Control Plan, Rule 9510, Indirect Source Review, etc. The applicant shall provide proof of compliance prior to building permit issuance.

5. The Final Map shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned, and future development shall be consistent with applicable sections of the Lathrop Municipal Code.

6. The applicant is responsible for contacting all appropriate utility companies to obtain their agreement for extension and/ or relocation of services necessary to final the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.

7. Any activity authorized by this Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map shall constitute acceptance of all of the conditions and obligations imposed by the City on this Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. The applicant( s), by said acceptance of these Conditions, waives any challenge as to the validity of these conditions.

8. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to issuance of any Building Permits.

9. The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map shall expire twenty-four ( 24) months from the date of approval unless a time extension is granted consistent with the policies and procedures of the Lathrop Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act.

BUILDING

1. All construction shall comply with the most recent adopted City and State building codes:
2019 California Building Code
2019 California Residential Code
2019 California Electrical Code
2019 California Mechanical Code
2019 California Plumbing Code
2019 California Fire Code
2019 California Green Code

2. Dimensioned building setbacks and property lines, street centerlines and between buildings or other structures shall be designed on plot plan.

3. All property lines and easements must be shown on plot plan. A statement that such lines and easements are shown is required.

4. The project design will conform with energy conservation measures articulated in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and address measures to reduce energy consumption such as flow restrictors for toilets, low consumptions light fixtures, and insulation and shall use to the extent feasible draught landscaping.
2of5 i' ;.

PUBLIC WORKS

1. Wastewater
a. Applicant shall be required to connect to the City sewer system prior to certificate of occupancy for the first building within the project.
b. The wastewater will be treated at the Manteca Wastewater Quality Control Facility( MWQCF) and capacity is available for purchase. Each parcel will require one ISU of wastewater capacity ( 240 gallons per day for low density residential). c. Applicant shall submit a wastewater study proving that the existing City infrastructure can support the additional wastewater contribution and shall participate in and fund any Master Plan updates if required.
d. Wastewater laterals shall be shown on the utility site plans and shall not be located within the driveway. A clean out shall be provided at the property line.

2. Potable Water
a. Applicant shall be required to connect to the water utility for domestic supply and pay all applicable connection fees. Any groundwater wells on site shall be abandoned under a permit from San Joaquin County prior to connecting potable water to the site. b. Water capacity is available for purchase from the City and each parcel will require 430 gallons per day of capacity.
c. Applicant shall submit a potable water study proving that the existing City infrastructure can support the additional demand and shall participate in and fund any Master Plan updates if required.
d. Water laterals and meter locations shall be shown on the utility site plans and shall not be located within the driveway.

3. Storm Drain
a. Applicant shall show storm water conveyance on the utility site plan. b. Applicant shall submit a storm water study proving that the existing City infrastructure can support the additional storm water contribution and shall participate in and fund any Master Plan updates if required. Applicant shall fund and construct improvements to the City' s storm drain system if it is determined to be insufficient to support the additional storm water from the Project.

4. Storm Water— Construction
a. Project is less than one acre, applicant shall complete a small project ESCP and submit to City for review and approval.

5. Frontage Improvements
a. Applicant shall dedicate Right- of-Way Easement ( ROW) and Public Utility Easement ( PUE) to City as necessary.
b. Applicant shall move all existing overhead utilities less than 34. 5 kVA underground within the frontage of the proposed development. All new utility connections shall be placed underground.
3of5 `' ;
s
s
c. Applicant shall submit a photometric plan to support the number and placement of the streetlight( s).
d. Applicant shall install all frontage improvements including but not limited to '/ z street width paving, sidewalk, curb, gutter, landscaping, hydrants, signing and striping, and streetlights. e. Applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement prior to the approval of the final map to guarantee all public improvements.

6. General Comments
a. Applicant shall retain the services of a California licensed civil engineer to design the improvements and utility plans for sewer, water storm drain lines and systems. b. Applicant shall create or participate in a Community Facilities District ( CFD) to fund the maintenance of all public infrastructure prior to issuance of the first building permit within the subdivision.
c. Applicant shall insure that all off-site and on- site improvements comply with City Standards. d. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations and plans for on- site storm water system shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
e. The Applicant shall execute a maintenance agreement for all onsite storm water quality treatment devices, swales and/or ponds.
f. Applicant shall install as part of their onsite improvement all necessary Best Management Practices ( BMP' s) for post construction in accordance with City guidelines and standards.

The BMP' s must be in place prior to final occupancy.
g. Applicant shall pay all appropriate fees including but not limited to Levee Impact Fee, Capital Facilities Fees, and Plan Check and Inspection Fees.
h. A geotechnical report shall be submitted for the project, which includes groundwater elevations, percolation rates for retention basins, soil compaction requirements, and recommendations for asphalt paving.
i. Grading and other construction activities that may cause dust shall be watered to control dust at the City Engineer' s direction. A water vehicle shall be available for dust control operations at all times during grading operations. The adjacent public street shall be kept free and clean of any project dirt, mud, materials, and debris.
j. Applicant shall provide a separate demolition plan and apply far a demolition permit for any existing buildings.
k. All improvements shall be designed and constructed per the most current City Standards.

LATHROP- MANTECA FIRE DISTRICT ( LMFD)

1. The project must conform to the appropriate edition of the California Fire Code ( currently the 2019 edition) and all related standards.

2. Permits shall be obtained from the fire code official. Permit( s) and fees, shall be paid prior to issuance of any and/ or all permits. Issued permits shall be kept on the premises designated therein at all times and shall be readily available for inspection by the fire code official. ( Permits are to be renewed on an annual basis)
4of5 ?= : a

3. Fire Department Development Fees for all new buildings must be paid in accordance with the City of Lathrop' s Ordinance and Resolutions adopting the fee schedule.

4. An approved water supply for fire protection, either temporary or permanent, shall be made available prior to commencing construction beyond the foundation stage, or as soon as combustible material arrives on the site.

5. Approved vehicle access for firefighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites.

Vehicle access shall be provided to within 100 feet ( 30 480 mm) of temporary or permanent fire department connections. Vehicle access shall be provided by either temporary or permanent roads, capable of supporting vehicle loading under all weather conditions. Vehicle access shall be maintained until permanent fire apparatus access roads are available.

7. The Fire Department Fire Access Roads shall meet the requirements established by the San Joaquin County Fire Chief' s Association.

8. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or fire-fighting purposes, a key box is required to be installed in an approved location. Please note that a separate key box will be required for each of the two access points. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the fire code official. In addition to key box( es), any automatic gates shall have Opticom access ability to provide necessary access for emergency apparatus.

9. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet ( 122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official.

10. Other fire & life safety requirements may be required at time of building plan review.

11. Final approval is subject to field inspections. Minimum 48- 72- hour notice required prior to any lifesafety fire inspections. Other conditions may apply at time of inspections and are subject to correction.

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

1. By exercising this Permit, the applicant hereby agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, elected and appointed officials, and employees, from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of its approval of this Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to the fullest extent permitted by law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
See enclosed memo dated August 23, 2022.

SofSl , . r ;
A , O
A (' I I i A Environmental Health Department
H HtlUliv
C O U N T Y------- Jasjit Kang, REHS, Oirector
Mun3appa Naidu, RENS, Assistant Direcfor
PROGRAM COORDiNATORS
Robert McClelion, REHS
Jeff Carruesco, REHS, RDI
Willy Ng, REHS
Michaei Kith. RENS
Melissa Nissim, REHS
Steven Shih, REHS
Michelie Henry. REHS
Elena Manzo, REHS
August 23, 2022
To: City of Lathrop Cammunity Development Department
Attention: David Niskanen
From: Aldara Salinas; 209-616-3019
Environmental Health Specialist
RE: TSM- 22- 118, Referral, SU00151Q2
310 8 342 Shilling Ave., Lathrop
The San Joaquin County Envi onmental Health Department ( EHD) recommends the following conditions as a part of developing this project:

1. Any geotechnical drilling shall be conducted under permit and inspection by The Environmental Health Department ( San Joaquin County Development Title, Section 9- 1115. 3 and 9- 1115. 6). 1868 E. Hazelton Avenue ( Stockton, California 95205 T 209 468- 3420 F 209 464- 0138 www. sjgay. org/ ehd K.'- t
w
t " z
Ka; r f
r :,. n w .
w t
x
x
w, a,.+:..,.:._....
a ' °'
t,.. .
h_.
h,+.,
x '" .
a` aa 1 CL
y
4 r Site
s;. *,
s, " i ,,
y i ' +." . ... J ''- MMN
is/
yt'
at
wMMNW '` er g
a 3'
c' a
yrygy 3d i
i* A '
p
4 S: *'.'
i
a.,`.
iw fl:
8 a
mWm
n .. 3
A. T
5 k, 1,
a
2 k
W{"" .. . a
k+ $
8 f .
wy" e w : u v" .,.
lj( l.;i`r
d A,;. . ,.,,.;.,.,, l,i`t
L
i.'ut-: a
x' ,
y
m, ;
w

3. . . , .._ . . .+,
wo iMw
u:. . s ys . ,. a
t n
ma: ih J.. . ,
e, s..: NA16 v W' Me+ a. ,' sae i,
a , a
f
d . Yp` i. ' .
8 e q• : aYfif
y'
rw! iK, . $
7 d. W' a"'
r' ," n
w a. '_ . . . d.. ,; -" ` ' Yr'
aK,
t' x a
a .., 91
M"
a`e: a
z;, `
F
r r++ ' a "" R'^..
r x ,`, n,:
3 1- 1
a a£}-
k ., ' '°""
r' ,. ; d` a"• .
y ..
a,
t
r, a: 1
b
wr
r
ea 3... aq. q
t
R
b
e H
P
k ^
P'.
x.`,, w... ebM" S""
y
m?.`

3. . '
f
r. R
e 7
i ,.

J '' •
r ,. w.. k'._»,. a
S
x *'
s'u: '' . . , -
f .. . ae
k ', tw:
wa- r
1• a# y # wr';
w, `,-_. .?'
a6wrw.++ w."

PLANNING DIVISION
Vicinity Map
or t;-=Crb VZ'M-22- 11g N
Vesting Tentative Map
C . k = + Alaniz Estates Subdivision I
p - ,,$ 310 and 342 Schilling Avenue
I '` APN: 196- 080- 34 and - 35
clvot to s a1e
tlIN O IItlJ' N' i OVOf 1V5 j0. I1Nii0']' d0 N1V1 0 rr
li4] NVI( IId3W aNV 35H9 O BVIQ 1 IflOW- 3 3 N 5 L 1 CZ NGLL 3S N31E1tlf C. S3M4YLilOS +' we uowey, a oy, a 3HL 0 NGLLaOd tl NI` JNI38" 5] d l 3-. Lt If10 IfO'dJf NTS' 9tl 39tld 1tl t. 3YV' 10 b m
q
1Y d I l! idVW' 5321 Jtl d NLI1V Hl. f0 z LO' 1 f0 N6LL JOd Y 0 NUISIAl4 V fu139 SA3/ af15 s nn s
NOISI/ IIOBnS S31b'1S3 Z/Nb' 7b' 4NVl I IJt/ d
g
y
sq; s 3 d°"
O
i
n
dvw rvoiswasns 3nuvLu3i Nu; 3n A
oo Q a a ` w
o
s a Q LL ff a
za" z a f w rc
z7 '
im' o cW y t c ° o ° o o
LL ` LL zO oi U
3 0
3 c i m c i i ' u u
aW
isN ia» »
h
N w Go aoa _ &
LL
Q x - - w - - - " w w
H, uo,
z; o z ", z
o aQ ' waS , o . 5 i
w w w w w w w
L
a
R -
y! w8 o wFo ` wzi s
I
Qo( s&`, Dsi 9
a s " a o rc3 ° o' 8 „
p
aGo . W<€ x& Fi
a
N =
a a a 8 3 `< I H I I
I o " owgo y a fa os` O
L J I
I
I
I
i
i . s. ex
zm
Fi ' R .
y
u
q
I
aa oi'
a
I I
6 I `'
a
9 9
J' : 5
J
s\ I` _
f .. _ ' l ,
y
T — _
ti— _ _ L — F
I
I a'
n-~
q.
s.
a) sy,
r
5 ' m - 3f1N3 V NOAtl
e
9W r, `-
T
y,
I
8 0^ I
oa w,
n y
I -_'.- I
cac —
S
S ya I.. 8 = yaw
I
z
4 o
N i
I
N_
J I
T
W
ga:
f
om sg 1
Jn
af
a
I Y - __
6 I 3 1----- Z
I
z I

3., A ..

I N
I} Q3ADNYN
m 8 39 Ol . , Q _
q
I
W \
3R' ON . 1' 3
I 8
m
s
t
I 66 I
I
S —
91_
8 I
I
I -
I +
9c
kC
3Nitniu3e iiuixi
l6
I
I I
8 O
L
6 J
w' I I
Qg'
f`.

N N
I .___ l_\\__.I
S+ ! I I ^ 8- I\
O' R
8 i
ed ^
I s
O ` b« 3 a
cez - aanorvaa aa
8 O. L 3WOH'. Y3
o
a
ZI
3 J'
I,. W
s9,,
M, a= - o=
a
I W I I I + tl.. . I Q (
i.] . ya . I
i ? i Pd I I =
a I
H
I k ..

I
wx
N
d I I
aa I
a
I
w
0 iw I
I I
Fx . n os _____. y
mo
w.A I
a
I
I
viNao nv doaHlvi
Y
3nd NIIIIHS Zb 78 OlE a
r 1? s W
1Z NOISIn149f1S S31d1S3 ZINb'` d
r
a vo
3 t0
oU
2 Y
Z, , a s .
w E o
a ' w a. ni
a i
i w E. O m N ._ ._. ___
ii
a
3AV NO V
Q
0z
i_ a
i-; m
r—,_ - z
a
m
w
o z _
m
o
f :

J -
I
I
o
l ;
l _ I
t
i - a _ -
a F
z
I
f.
2 I _
E'- o . . -
i
f - _.
m
L o
y
f
i
I
f
o
J
W
f
I _ ... - z
I
4 o i i i-- r,
Q
l _ Q
o
U o
Q

CITY OF LATHROP
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22- 13

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LATHROP

RECOMIVIENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ALANIZ ESTATES VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP( VTM- 22- 118)
WHEREAS, the City of Lathrop Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map( VTM-22- 118) project pursuant to the Lathrop Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the property is located at 310 and 342 Shilling Avenue ( APN: 196- 080- 34 and - 35); and
WHEREAS, the subject site is located in a Medium Density Residential ( MD) General Plan designation, Multi- Family Residential ( RM- 3) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development". This exemption is for a projecC that is consistent with Che applicable General Plan designation and applicable Zoning designation and regulations, occurs within City limits on a project site of five ( 5) acres or less
substantially surrounded by urban uses, has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or lhreatened species, not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, and water quality and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services; and WHEREAS, by Adopting Resolution No. 21- 4923 based on substantial evidence in the record, City Council, acting as the lead agency, adopted Adequate Progress Findings toward providing 200- year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Reclamation District 17 basin by the year 2028; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed project is consistent with the land use goals and policies the City of Lathrop General Plan, the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC), including the Historic Overlay District, and also consistent with the City' s Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the requirements and conditions of this resolution are reasonable in preserving, protecting, providing for, and fostering the health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry in general, and the persons who work in or visit Che development in particular; and
WHEREAS, section 16. 12. 050 of the Lathrop Municipal Code mandates the transmittal of a recommendation to the City Council by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this pu6lic meeting was given in all respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all written evidence and oral testimony presented to date.

Plannina Commission Resolution IVo. 22- 13 Page 1 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Planning Commission of the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following findings;

1. The location of the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the zoning code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for the RM Multifamily Residential District and Historic Overlay District Zoning District. The use is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the City.

2. The proposed project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 1736 and Chapter 17. 38 of the Lathrop Municipal Code. As conditioned, the project will also comply with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and various federal, state and local standards applicable to the project. The Conditions of Approval address Planning, Building, and Fire Department requirements.

3. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map and Minor Variance are exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development".

4. By Adopting Resolution No. 21- 4923 based on substantial evidence in the record, City Council, acting as the lead agency, adopted Adequate Progress Findings toward providing 200- year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Reclamation District 17 basin by the year 202$.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission o the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following Tentative Subdivision Map findings;

1. The proposed niap is cofzsistent with the Ge zeral Plc rz. The proposed map is a residential subdivision that implements the land use objectives in the Lathrop General Plan.

2. The design or irnproventents of the proposed scebdivisioiz ar-e consistent rvith the General Plc ra. As conditioned, the design of the map and proposed utility and improvements are consistent with the requirements of the General Plan. Ali required improvements are conditioned to comply with the City' s standards and specifications.

3. The site is physically sttitcrble for the p oposed residential development. The site is designated as Medium Density Residential land use in the Generai Plan. Tt e applicant and staff have worked closely to ensure the map and its conditions of approval address public infrastructure and public services for the development of the propose residential development.

4. The site is physically sititczble for the proposed densiry of developrnent. The Lathrop General Plan identities the project area to allow for residential development. The map satisfies the Medium Density requirement at 10. 6 units per acre ( range is 8- 15 units per acre) and meets the minimum standards for lot widths and lot depths. Development of the site will comply with the requirements set forth in the Lathrap Municipal Code Development Standards.

Plannin Commission Resolution No. 22- 13 Pa e 2 of 4

5. Tlte design of the subdivisiora or the proposed improverraents rvill not cniise stibstaiztial e zviro zmentnl dnniage or stabstantially injc re fish or rvildlife or their habitat. As stated above the project is exempt according to the Caiifornia Environmental Quality Act CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development."

6. The desigrz of the st bdivisio i or type of improvenients will not cause serioi s paiblic health problems. The development of the project would not involve a range of potentially significant effects on public health and safety. As stated above the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19 § 15332 Class 32 " In- Fill Development."

7. The design of the subdivisio z or the type of improverraents rvill rtot conflict tivith easements, acqarired by tke pcablic at large, for czccess through or se of, praperty within the proposed sccbdivision. The design of the subdivision does not conflict with any public easements for access through or use of property within the subdivision. Conditions of approval are included to dedicate land, right of way and to provide easements where necessary for public access, utilities, and infrastructure.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Lathrop based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings, its findings above and pursuant to its independent review and consideration, does hereby recommend approval of the Alaniz Estates Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTM- 22- 118) to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval dated October 19, 2022 listed as Attachment # 2 of the Staff Report, incorporated by reference herein.

Plannina Commissioo Resolution I To. 22- 13 Pag 3 of 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lathrop at a regular meeting on the 19` h
day of October, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Ishihara, Ralmilay, Gatto, Jackson
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Rhodes
Tos Ishihara, ice Chair
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FO .

M k Mei sn r, Secr tary Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Planning Commission Resolution No. 22- 13 Page 4 of 4

← All documents from this meeting