Agenda packet — Lathrop City Council, February 13, 2023 (part 2 of 3)

sa
Date: January 25, 2023
To:

City of Lathrop Waste Water- 3014982
R
Attn: Greg Gibson ( 209) 992- 0047 E_Mail ggibson@ci. lathrop. ca. us Subject: Price Quote No: ST 20230125- 01 .. NPDES Analyses ( April ' 23 - June ' 23) Good day Greg,
This quote is for Partial Year 2023; one quarter, April through June. Please review footnotes for additional information. We look forward to being of service.

Quote For Time Period: April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023 Sampled By: FGL Pick Up
Constituent
Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price
Method
Analytical Methods Report( EFF- 001 & RSW- 001)
Metals- Sample Prep EPA 200. 2 20. 00 2 40. 00
Individual Metals
EPA 200. 7/ 200. 8 270. 00 2 540. 00
Sb, A1, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr,Cu, Fe, Pb, Hg,Mn, Mo, Ni,Se, Ag, T1, Zn) Cyanide, Total( CN) SM4500- CN C, E 75. 00 2 150. 00
Subcontracted: Asbestos, Wastewater EPA 100. 2 345. 00 2 690. 00 Subcontracted: Dioxins, TCDD Only( Aqueous- WW) 285. 00 2 570. 00 VOCs Full List EPA 624. 1 183. 00 2 366. 00
Semi-Volatile Organics( Full List)
EPA 625. 1 ( SemiZgg, 00 2 578. 00 Volatiles)
Chlorinated Pesticides& PCBs EPA 608. 3 197. 00 2 394. 00 Subcontracted: Mercury- Methyl Mercury EPA 1630 255. 00 2 510. 00 Total Hardness( as CaCO3) SM2340B 34. 00 2 68. 00
MBAS SM5540C 60. 00 2 120. 00
Electrical Conductivity( EC) SM2510B 24. 00 2 48. 00
Total Dissolved Solids( TDS) SM2540C 24. 00 2 48. 00
Chloride( Cl) EPA 300. 0 24. 00 2 48. 00
Total Phosphorus( P) EPA 200. 7/ 200. 8 32. 00 2 64. 00 Sulfate( SO4) EPA 300. 0 24. 00 2 48. 00
Total Sulfide( H2S) SM4500- S D 29. 00 2 58. 00
Ammonia( NH3- N) SM4500- NH3 H 33. 00 2 66. 00
Nitrate( NO3- N)
300. 0/ SM4500

24. 00 2 48. 00
Nitrite( NO2- N)
300. 0/ SM4500
Z4. 00 2 48. 00
1, 2, 3- Trichloropropane SRL 524M- TCP 100. 00 2 200. 00 EDB& DBCP( temporary subcontract) EPA 504. 1 100. 00 2 200. 00 Herbicides EPA 515. 3 165. 00 2 330. 00
Subcontracted: EPA 525. 2 w/ 507 Pesticides, Full List EPA 525. 2 265. 00 2 530. 00 Carbamates EPA 531. 1 165. 00 2 330. 00
Subcontracted: Endothall EPA 548. 1 165. 00 2 330. 00
Diquat( temporary subcontract) EPA 549. 2 165. 00 2 330. 00 Subcontracted: Tributyltin( Liquid and Solid) 250. 00 2 500. 00

Page 1 of 4 ends

Corporate Officas 8 Laboratory Ottico& Laboratory OTTice 8 Laboratory Office& Laboratory Office 8 Laboratory 853 Corporation Street 2500 Stagecoach Road 563 E. Lindo Avenue 3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D 9415 W. Goshen Avenue Santa Paula, CA 93060 Stockton, CA 95215 Chico, CA 95926 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Visalia, CA 93291 TEL:( 805) 392- 2000 TEL:( 209) 942- 0182 TEL:( 530) 343- 5818 TEL:( 805) 783- 2940 TEL:( 559) 734- 9473 Env FAX:( 805) 525-4172/ Ag FAX:( 805) 392- 2063 FAX:( 209) 942- 0423 FAX:( 530) 343- 3807 FAX:( 805) 783- 2912 FAX:( 559) 734- 8435 CA ELAP Certification No. 1573 CA ELAP Certification No. 1563 CA ELAP Certification No. 2670 CA ELAP Certification No. 2775 CA ELAP Certification No. 2810 146
Constituent Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Eactended Price Method
Analytical Methods Report( EFF-001 & RSW- 002)
Subcontracted: EPA 8270 Total Pyrethroid Pesticides EPA 8270 385. 00 2 770. 00 Constituent Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Analytical Methods Report ( EFF- 001 & RSW- 001, RSW- 002 Dissolved Organic Carbon( DOC) SM 5310C 70. 00 3 210. 00 Total Organic Carbon( TOC) SM 5310C 70. 00 3 210. 00
Constituent Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Routine Chemical Methods ( INF- 001)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand( BOD5) SM5210B 33. 00 26 858. 00 Total Suspended Solids( TSS) SM2540D 20. 00 26 520. 00
Constituent Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Routine Chemical Methods ( EFF- 001)
Total& Fecal Coliform- LTB Series- 15 tube SM9221B, E 33. 00 91 3003. 00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand( BOD5) SM5210B 33. 00 52 1716. 00 Total Suspended Solids( TSS) SM2540D 20. 00 52 1040. 00 Ammonia( NH3- N) SM4500- NH3 H 43. 00 13 559. 00
VOCs( DBCM, DCBM, Bromoform, Chloroform) EPA 624. 1 115. 00 3 345. 00 Prep for Total Metals Analysis EPA 200 20. 00 3 60. 00
Individual Metals- Ba EPA 200. 7/ EPA

15. 00 3 45. 00 200. 8
Nitrate( NO3- N)
300. 0/ SM4500

24. 00 3 72. 00
Nitrite( NO2-N)
300. 0/ SM4500
Z4. 00 3 72. 00
Nitrate + Nitrite as N( NO3- N+ NO2- N)
SM4500- NO3

0. 00 3 0. 00 F/ EPA 300. 0
Dissolved Organic Carbon( DOC) SM 5310C 75. 00 1 75. 00 Total Hardness( as CaCO3) SM2340B 34. 00 1 34. 00
Subcontracted: Mercury- Methyl Mercury EPA 1630 255. 00 1 255. 00 Subcontracted: Mercury- Ultra Low Level( Sampling EPA 1631/ EPA Clean Hands/ 185. 00 1 185. 00 Dirty Hands EPA 1669) 1669 Individual Metals- Pb EPA 200. 7/ EPA

15. 00 1 15. 00 200. 8
Chlorinated Pesticides( Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon)
EPA 625. 1
365. 00 1 365. 00 Pesticides)
Constituent alytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Eutended Price Method
Routine Chemical Methods ( RSW- 002, 003

Page 2 of 4 ends

147
Ammonia( NH3- N) SM4500-NH3 H 33. 00 26 858. 00
Dissolved Organic Carbon( DOC) SM 5310C 70. 00 2 140. 00 Total Hardness( as CaCO3) SM2340B 34. 00 2 68. 00
Constituent
Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Toxicity Testing( EFF- 001)
Subcontracted: Bioassay- Acute Toxicity, Rainbow Trout 1750. 00 1 1750. 00 Subcontracted: Bioassay- Chronic Toxicity, 3- Species, 5- 7475. 00 1 7475. 00 Dilutions
Constituent
Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price
Method
Toxicity Testing ( Dowstream RSW- 002, or RSW-003)
Subcontracted: Bioassay- Acute Toxicity, Hyalella
1750. 00 1 1750. 00 Azteca
Constituent
Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Field Services
Samples Pick up Fee 35. 00 4 140. 00
Total Price Quote: 29842. 00
If a detection level exceedance occurs on the primary sample, the Travel Blank will be analyzed and charged as an additional sample. This pertains to EPA Methods: 504, 524. 2, 551 or SRL524M.

A QualityAssurance/ Quality Control report is supplied with all of our analyses. This assures our valued clients of accurate and defensible data.

All work undertaken is subject to our terms and conditions, which are available upon request.

Note: Beginning September 2022, invoices will show a $ 3. 00 Materials/ Disposal Fee for each COC submitted.

Note: FGL provides our customers with sampling supplies at no charge, when picked up at the lab. A fee applies to have them delivered.

Note: FGL may subcontract certain analyses whenever industry conditions restrict the ability to provide results within a timely manner. This may include certain organic methods such as: EPA 500' s, 600' s and 8000' s.

If you have any questions regarding this quote or require any modifications, please call ( 805) 392- 2000 and ask to speak with a marketing associate. Thank you.

Page 3 of 4 ends

148
Reviewed and Glenn Olsen Yy Prepared By: Glenn A. Olsen Approved By Marketing Director Date: 2023- 01- 25 14: 40

Page 4 of 4 ends

149
a
Date: January 23, 2023
To: Veolia Water North America MBR- 3015762
Attn: Greg Gibson ggibson@ci. lathrop. ca. us
Subject: Price Quote No: ST 20230120- 01 . . LCTF - WDR ( Partial Year Estimate) Good day Greg, FGL appreciates the opportunity to provide this quote based upon the current schedule of analysis for the Lathrop CTF. This quote is valid March 1, 2023 through June 31, 2023 at which time a subsequent quote will take over, running from July 1, through June 30, 2024. We look forward to being of continued service.

Quote For Time Period: March 01, 2023 through June 30, 2023 Sampled By: FGL Pick Up
Constituent
alytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Daily( 7- Days per Week)
Total& Fecal Coliform- LTB Series- 15 tube SM9221B, E 33. 00 122 4026. 00 Group Price: 4026. 00
Constituent
alytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Weekly( EFF& INF)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand( BOD5) SM5210B 33. 00 36 1188. 00 Total Suspended Solids ( TSS) SM2540D 20. 00 36 720. 00 Total& Fecal Coliform- LTB Series- 15 tube SM9221B, E 33. 00 36 1188. 00 Group Price: 3096. 00
Constituent
Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Monthly( EFF& INF)
Total Dissolved Solids ( TDS) SM2540C 20. 00 8 160. 00
Group Price: 160. 00
Constituent
Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Monthly( Effluent Only, Rush)
Nitrate ( NO3 or NO3- N)
300. 0/ SM4500
Z0. 00 4 80. 00
Nitrite( NO2 or NO2- N)
300. 0/ SM4500

20. 00 4 80. 00
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen( TKN) EPA 351. 1 53. 00 4 212. 00 Total Nitrogen( TKN + NO3- N + NO2- N) Calculation 0. 00 4 0. 00 Group Price: 372. 00
Page i of 3
Corporate O ces& Laboratory Office 8. Laboratory Offiee 8 Laboratory Oftice& Laboratory Office 8 Laboratory 853 Corporation Street 2500 Stagecoach Road 563 E. Lindo Avenue 3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D 9415 W. Goshen Avenue Santa Paula, CA 93060 Stockton, CA 95215 Chico, CA 95926 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Visalia, CA 93291 TEL:( 805) 392- 2000 TEL:( 209) 942- 0182 TEL:( 530) 343- 5818 TEL:( 805) 783- 2940 TEL:( 559)734- 9473 Env FAX:( 805) 525- 4172/ Ag FAX:( 805) 392- 2063 FAX:( 209) 942- 0423 FAX:( 530) 343- 3807 FAX:( 805) 783-2912 FAX:( 559) 734-8435 CA ELAP Certification No. 1573 CA EIAP Certification No. 1563 CA ELAP Certification No. 2670 CA ELAP Certification No. 2775 CA ELAP CeRification No. 2810 150
Constituent
Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Annually( EFF Priority Pollutants)
Priority Pollutant Metals
EPA 200. 7/ 200. 8 169. 00 1 169. 00 Sb, As, Be, Cd, Cr,Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni,Se, Ag,T1, Zn) Chromium VI( Cr+ 6) EPA 218. 6 59. 00 1 59. 00
Chlorinated Pesticides & PCBs EPA 608. 3 130. 00 1 130. 00 VOCs Full List EPA 624. 1 183. 00 1 183. 00
Semi- Volatile Organics ( Full List)
EPA 625. 1 ( Semi2gg. 00 1 289. 00
Volatiles)
Chlorinated Pesticides
EPA 625. 1
197. 00 1 197. 00
Pesticides)
Subcontracted: Dioxins, Full Congeners List
687. 00 1 687. 00 Soil/ Sludge)
Subcontracted: Asbestos Wastewater EPA 100. 2 370. 00 1 370. 00 Group Price: 2084. 00
Constituent
Analytical
p ce per Sample No of Samples Extended Price
Method
Annually( Water Supply)
Prep for Total Metals Analysis EPA 200 18. 00 1 18. 00
Individual Metals- B; Ca; Fe; K;Mg; Mn; Na;
EPA 200. 7/ EPA
gg, 00 1 98. 00 200. 8
Total Hardness ( as CaCO3) SM2340B 34. 00 1 34. 00
Group Price: 150. 00
Constituent
Analytical
price per Sample No of Samples Extended Price Method
Field Services
Sample Pick Up, Standard Weekday 35. 00 88 3080. 00
Sample Collection Fee- Saturday/ Sunday 50. 00 33 1650. 00 Sample Collection Fee- Holiday 75. 00 1 75. 00
Group Price: 4805. 00
Total Price Quote: 14693. 00
A Quality Assurance/ Quality Control report is supplied with all of our analyses. This assures our valued clients of accurate and defensible data.

All work undertaken is subject to our terms and conditions, which are available upon request.

Note: Beginning September 2022, invoices will show a $ 3. 00 Materials/ Disposal Fee for each COC submitted.

Note: FGL provides our customers with sampling supplies at no charge, when picked up at the lab. A fee applies to have them delivered.

Note: FGL may subcontract certain analyses whenever industry conditions restrict the ability to provide results

Page 2 of 3 ends

151
within a timely manner. This may include certain organic methods such as: EPA 500' s, 600' s and 8000' s.

If you have any questions regarding this quote or require any modifications, please call ( 805) 392- 2000 and ask to speak with a marketing associate. Thank you.

Reviewed and Glenn Olsen Prepared By: Glenn A. Olsen
Approved By Marketing Director Date: 2ozs- oi- zs iz: is

Page 3 of 3 ends

152
ITEM 4. 9

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI TO

UPDATE THE INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES
MASTER PLAN, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22-
24 AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 with EKI Environment & Water, Inc. to update
the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan,
CIP PW 22- 19 & CIP WW 22- 24 and Approve
Budget Amendment
CEQA STATUS: The project is exempt according to California Environmental Quality Act Article 18 § 15262,
Feasibility and Planning Studies"
SUMMARY:

The Integrated Water Resources Master Plan ( IWRMP) is necessary to implement the City' s General Plan and supports utility operations, budget, and rate studies. The Master Plan is also the basis for CIP programming, developing land use planning and development fees. On April 11, 2022, Council approved an agreement with Environment & Water, Inc. ( EKI) to update the IWRMP. Additional services from EKI are essential to update the City' s geodatabase for the water, wastewater and recycled water systems.

Staff is requesting that Council approve Amendment No. 2 with EKI to provide the geodatabase updates needed to support the IWRMP Amendment in the amount of 89, 500.

Sufficient funds were not included in the adopted FY 22/ 23 budget for CIPs PW 22- 19 and WW 22- 24. Staff requests that Council approve a budget amendment allocating $ 30, 670 from the Water System Capital Replacement Fund 5600 to CIP PW 22- 19 and $ 23, 035 from the MBR Capital Replacement Fund 6110 plus $ 12, 957 from the Wastewater Capital Replacement Fund 6060 enterprise funds to CIP WW 22- 24.

The remainder of the cost for the EKI Amendment No. 2 will be allocated from the project contingency available in CIP PW 22- 19 ( Water) and CIP WW- 24 ( Wastewater and Recycled Water).

BACKG ROU N D:

The Public Works Department is responsible for managing and maintaining the City' s water, sewer, and recycled water facilities.
153
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI FOR IWRMP AMENDMENT, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22- 24, AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
The IWRMP will forecast and update the water and sewer demand projections and address modifications in regulatory requirements, population and growth projections, proposed land use, climate change, and other factors.

On April 11, 2022, Council approved an agreement with EKI to update the IWRMP.

Additional services from EKI are needed to update the City' s water, sewer, and recycled water systems geodatabase to complete the IWRMP amendment.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The IWRMP is necessary for the implementation of the City' s General Plan and supports utility operations, budget, and rate studies. The Master Plan is also the basis towards CIP programming, developing land use planning and development fees.

CEQA STATUS:

Staff has determined the CEQA status for the project as exempt according to California Environmental Quality Act Article 18 § 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies".

The De Novo Planning Group prepared the Environmental Impact Report for the current IWRMP that was adopted in 2019, and Staff will be retaining De Novo to prepare an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost of Amendment No. 2 to provide geodatabase support for the IWRMP is for an amount of $89, 500. The table below represents the cost breakdown for each task.

Master Plan U date Component Cost
U date Water S stem Geodatabase PW 22- 19 29, 700
U date Wastewater S stem Geodatabase WW 22- 24 42, 600
U date Rec cled Water S stem Geodatabase WW 22- 24 17, 200 Sufficient funds were not included in the adopted FY 22/ 23 budget for CIPs PW 22- 19 and WW 22- 24. Staff requests that Council approve a budget amendment allocating $ 30, 670 from the Water System Capital Replacement Fund 5600 to CIP PW 22- 19 and $ 23, 035 from the MBR Capital Replacement Fund 6110 plus $ 12, 957 from the Wastewater Capital Replacement Fund 6060 enterprise funds to CIP WW 22- 24.

Staff requests Council approve the following budget amendment:
154
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI FOR IWRMP AMENDMENT, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22- 24, AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
Increase Transfer Out
5600- 99- 00- 990- 9010 30, 670
Increase Transfer Out
6110- 99- 00- 990- 9010 23, 035
Increase Transfer Out
6060- 99- 00- 990- 9010 12, 957
Increase Transfer In
5690- 99- 00- 393- 00- 00 CIP PW 22- 19 30, 670
Increase Transfer In
6090- 99- 00- 393- 00- 00 CIP WW 22- 24 35, 992
Increase Appropriation
5690- 80- 00- 420- 83- 00 CIP PW 22- 19 30, 670
Increase Appropriation
6090- 80- 00- 420- 83- 00 CIP WW 22- 24 35, 992
ATTACH M ENTS:

A. Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 with EKI Environment & Water, Inc. to update the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan, CIP PW 22- 19 & CIP WW 22- 24 and Approve Budget Amendment
B. Amendment No. 2 with EKI Environment & Water, Inc., to provide geodatabase support for the IWRMP
155
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI FOR IWRMP AMENDMENT, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22- 24, AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
if" y`' o / o y3
Greg son Date
Senio Civil Engineer
I 3 I/ zo'L3
Brad ylor Date
City Engineer
Z- I- ZoZ3
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
i%
f '
a
Cari Jame' s Date
Finance Di` e tor
Z..- Zo z.;
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
2•si• 2-3
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
156
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI ENVIRONMENT & WATER, INC.

TO UPDATE THE INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENT, CIP PW 22- 19 & CIP WW 22- 24 AND APPROVE BUDGET

AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the City' s water, sewer and recycled water master plan documents, collectively referred to as the City' s Integrated Water Resources Master Plan ( IWRMP) is used to forecast and update water and sewer demand projections, address changes in regulatory requirements, population and growth projections, proposed land use, climate change and other factors; and WHEREAS, in 2016, EKI Environment & Water, Inc. ( EKI) and De Novo Planning Group ( De Novo) assisted the City to update the IWRMP and prepare the associated project Environmental Impact Report which were approved and adopted by Council in December, 2019; and
WHEREAS, since adoption of IWRMP, significant changes in projected water demands and water supplies, planned land development and other factors have necessitated a comprehensive amendment to the IWRMP; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2022, Council approved an agreement with EKI to update the IWRMP to account for recent development, proposed land use changes, regulatory requirements and other factors; and
WHEREAS, additional services from EKI are requested to update the City' s geodatabase for the water, wastewater and recycled water systems in order for EKI to complete the IWRMP update as the geodatabase updates were not included in EKI' s original scope and were originally planned to be performed by another consultant; and
WHEREAS, at the request of staff, EKI provided a proposal to provide the geodatabase update services. Amendment No. 2 is for $ 89, 500, and the cost breakdown for each task is as follows:

Master Plan U date Com onent Cost
U date Water S stem Geodatabase PW 22- 19 29, 700
U date Wastewater S stem Geodatabase WW 22- 24 42, 600
U date Rec cled Water S stem Geodatabase WW 22- 24 17, 200 WHEREAS, sufficient funds were not included in the adopted FY 22/ 23 budget for CIPs PW 22- 19 and WW 22- 24. Staff requests that Council approve a budget amendment allocating $ 30, 670 from the Water System Capital Replacement Fund 5600 to CIP PW 22- 19 and $ 23, 035 from the MBR Capital Replacement Fund 6110 plus $ 12, 957 from the Wastewater Capital Replacement Fund 6060 enterprise funds to CIP WW 22- 24; and
157
WHEREAS, the project is exempt according to California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 18 § 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies".

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby approves the following actions:

1. Amendment No. 2 with EKI Environment and Water, Inc. ( EKI) is hereby approved to provide an update to the City' s Integrated Water Resources Master Plan in the amount of $ 89, 500.

2. The following budget amendment:

Increase Transfer Out
5600- 99- 00- 990- 9010 30, 670
Increase Transfer Out
6110- 99- 00- 990- 9010 23, 035
Increase Transfer Out
6060- 99- 00- 990- 9010 12, 957
Increase Transfer In
5690- 99- 00- 393- 00- 00 CIP PW 22- 19 30, 670
Increase Transfer In
6090- 99- 00- 393- 00- 00 CIP WW 22- 24 35, 992
Increase Appropriation
5690- 80- 00- 420- 83- 00 CIP PW 22- 19 30, 670
Increase Appropriation
6090- 80- 00- 420- 83- 00 CIP WW 22- 24 35, 992
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City finds the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan Amendment is exempt according to California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 18 § 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies". 158
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of February 2023, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 159

ATTACHMENT
M R
AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LATHROP AND
EKI ENVIRONMENT & WATER, INC. DATED APRIL 11, 2022

TO UPDATE THE WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS

GEODATABASE FOR THE INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, CIP PW 22- 19 ( WATER) AND CIP WW 22- 24

WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER)
THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT ( hereinafter " AMENDMENT NO. 2") to the agreement between EKI Environment & Water, Inc. and the City of Lathrop dated April 11, 2022, ( hereinafter AGREEMENT") dated for convenience this 13th day of February, 2023 , is by and between EKI Environment & Water, Inc. (" CONSULTANT") and the City of Lathrop, a California municipal corporation (" CITY");
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is specially trained, experienced, and competent to provide the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan Amendment, CIP PW 22- 19 ( Water) and CIP WW 22- 24 ( Wastewater and Recycled Water), which are required by this agreement; and WHEREAS, CITY selected the CONSULTANT pursuant to said qualifications; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2022, CONSULTANT and CITY entered into an AGREEMENT to provide the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan Amendment ( IWRMP), CIP PW 22- 19 Water) and CIP WW 22- 24 ( Wastewater and Recycled Water), and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1, dated August 4, 2022, was issued for CONSULTANT to perform an evaluation of the City' s Biochemical Oxygen Demand contributions to the City of Manteca' s Water Quality Control Facility by amending the scope of work for Task 3 Flow Monitoring of the original Agreement, and did not change the amount of $ 421, 900 of the AGREEMENT dated April 11, 2022; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has provided CITY with a proposal for updating the water, wastewater and recycled water systems geodatabase that is needed to complete the IWRMP; for a time and materials cost, not to exceed $ 89, 500 which is to be performed under this AMENDMENT NO. 2; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing to render such tasks under AMENDMENT NO. 2 needed for the geodatabase update for the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.

NOW, THEREFORE, CONSULTANT and the CITY agree as follows:

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT
1) Scope of Service. Section ( 1) of the AGREEMENT is hereby amended to add the following:

Page 1 of 3 ends

160
CITY OF LATHROP — AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI ENVIROMENT & WATER, INC. TO

UPDATE THE WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS GEODATABASE FOR THE IWRMP, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22- 24
CONSULTANT agrees to provide Integrated Water Resources Master Plan in accordance with the scope of work and fee proposal provided by CONSULTANT, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and shall provide proof of payment for equipment rental on their invoices in addition to the scope of work in the original AGREEMENT dated April 11, 2022.

CONSULTANT agrees to diligently perform these services in accordance with the upmost standards of its profession and to CITY' S satisfaction. 2) Compensation. Section ( 2) of the AGREEMENT for Consulting Services is hereby amended as follows:

CITY hereby agrees to pay CONSULTANT an additional sum not to exceed $ 89, 500 for the Professional Consulting Services set forth in Exhibit "A" of this AMENDMENT NO. 2.

CONSULTANT shall be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of progress billings containing all information contained in Paragraph 5 of the original AGREEMENT. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to compensation for work not included in the original scope of work, and this AMENDMENT NO. 2 unless a written change order or authorization describing the extra work and payment terms has been executed by CITY' S Authorized Representative prior to the commencement of the work. 3) Effective Date and Term
The effective date of AMENDMENT NO. 2 is February 13, 2023, and it shall terminate no later than June 30, 2024.

All other terms of the original AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect. 4) Applicabilitv to Oriqinal Consultant AGREEMENT
All terms and conditions set forth in the AGREEMENT dated April 11, 2022 are still in effect and are incorporated by reference herein and said AGREEMENT is incorporated by reference herein.
5) Siqnatures
The individuals executing this AMENDMENT NO. 2 represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this AMENDMENT NO. 2 on behalf of the respective legal entities of the CONSULTANT and the CITY. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

Page 2 of 3 ends

161
CITY OF LATHROP — AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH EKI ENVIROMENT & WATER, INC. TO

UPDATE THE WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS GEODATABASE FOR THE IWRMP, CIP PW 22- 19 AND CIP WW 22- 24
Approved as to Form: City of Lathrop
City Attorney
Salvador Navarrete Date
Recommended for Approval: City of Lathrop
Assistant City Manager
Michael King Date
Approved by: City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
Consultant: EKI Environment & Water, Inc.

Jonathan Sutter, P. E.
2001 Junipero Serra Blvd, Suite 300
Daly City, CA 94014
Phone: ( 650) 292- 9100
Federal ID # 94- 3087395
Lathrop Business License # 20137
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Page3of3
162
B
w w
environment e & water
Corporate Office
2001 Junipero Serra Boulevard, Suite 300
Daly City, CA 94014
650) 292- 9100
ekiconsult. com
9 January 2023
Brad Taylor, PE
City Engineer
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Subject: Proposal for Water and Wastewater Systems Geodatabase Update Integrated Water Resources Master Plan Amendment
City of Lathrop, California
EKI C20049. 00)
EKI Environment & Water, Inc. ( EKI) is pleased to present to the City of Lathrop ( Lathrop or City) this proposal for updating the City' s water, wastewater, and recycled water systems geodatabase in support of the City' s 2022 Integrated Water Resources Master Plan ( IWRMP) Amendment.

SCOPE OF WORK
On 20 October 2022, EKI submitted a memorandum entitled Request to Update the City' s Geodatabase summarizing the required edits to the City' s water and wastewater systems geodatabase to construct the City' s hydraulic models and carry out further hydraulic modeling analysis. The scope of work associated with Tasks 1 and 2 below aligns with the October 2022 memo, included as Attachment A. Task 3 includes the scope of work to update the City' s recycled water system geodatabase.

Task 1— Update Water System Geodatabase
The following edits will be made to the water system geodatabase:

Resolve discrepancies between the geodatabase and record drawings; Add missing features and records;
Apply a unique ID system to new system features;
Reconcile system elevation datum;
Remove duplicate datasets; and
Perform project management and associated communications.

Task 2— Update Wastewater System Geodatabase
The following edits will be made to the wastewater system geodatabase:

Resolve discrepancies between the geodatabase and record drawings; Add missing features and records;
Apply a unique ID system to new system features;
Reconcile system elevation datum;
Add pipe upstream and downstream invert elevations;
Formerly known as Erler 8 Kalinowski, Inc.

Oakland, CA• Davis, CA• Marin, CA• Sacramento, CA• Irvine, CA EI Segundo, CA• Centennial, CO• Salem, NH• Saratoga Springs, NY 163
Brad Taylor environment
City of lathrop water
9 January 2023

Page 2 ends

Remove duplicate datasets; and
Perform project management and associated communications.

Task 3— Update Recycled Water System Geodatabase
The City has not updated its recycled water system geodatabase since the 2019 IWRMP. Based a preliminary review of recent recycled water system improvements, EKI will make the following edits to the recycled water system geodatabase:

Update distribution system features to reflect improvements since 2018; Review and update ponds and agricultural irrigation areas; Review and update planned recycled water hydrant locations; Refine landscape irrigation areas in the Central Lathrop and Mossdale development areas to reflect recent and planned development; and
Update total landscape irrigation acreage for River Islands.

EKI understands that River Islands operates its own non- potable water distribution system, which will not be explicitly modeled by the recycled water hydraulic model. EKI will review and update the total landscape irrigation acreage for River Islands for water balance, storage and pump capacity analyses.

COMPENSATION
We propose that compensation for consulting services by EKI be on a time and expense reimbursement basis in accordance with our Schedule of Charges, dated 1 January 2022.

Attachment B). Based on the Scope of Work described above, we propose a budget of$ 89, 500, as outlined in Table 1 below and detailed in Attachment C. EKI will charge against this budget and will advise if additional budget becomes necessary.

Table 1— Cost Estimate by Task
Task
Task 1— Update Water System Geodatabase 29, 700
Task 2— Update Wastewater System Geodatabase 42, 600
Task 3— Update Recycled Water System Geodatabase 17, 200 Total $ 89, 500
164
Brad Taylor environment
City of Lathrop water
9 January 2023

Page 3 ends

PROIECT SCHEDULE
EKI is available to initiate work upon receiving authorization from the City. EKI anticipates that the above scope of work can be completed within sixteen ( 16) weeks of authorization.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Except as specifically modified above, all other terms of our 11 April 2022 Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. If this proposal meets with your approval, please send us an Agreement Amendment to review and execute.

We are excited about the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this proposal in greater detail.

Very truly yours,
EKI Environment & Water, Inc.
10 at an Sutter, PE
Pr j ct Manager
City of Lathrop
Authorized Representative)
Date)
Attachments
A. Memorandum: Request to Update the City' s Geodatabase, dated 20 October 2022 B. 2022 Schedule of Charges
C. Budget Estimate for Proposed Scope of Work
165

ATTACH M E NTS
166
environment e & water
20 October 2022

MEMORANDUM
To: Greg Gibson ( City of Lathrop)
From: Jonathan Sutter( EKI)
Tina Wang( EKI)
Subject: Request to Update the City' s Geodatabase
City of Lathrop— Public Works Department
EKI C20049. 01)
EKI Environment and Water, Inc. ( EKI) reviewed the City of Lathrop' s ( City' s) water, wastewater, and recycled water systems geodatabase against the record drawings provided by the City and noticed data gaps. The City, EKI, and the City' s GIS consultant, Condor, met on 29 September 2022 to discuss filling in these data gaps and applying additional edits so that EKI can readily update the hydraulic models from the City' s geodatabase. Pursuant to the meeting, City requested EKI to outline the required edits for the City and Condor to implement. This memorandum summarizes the required edits for the water and wastewater systems, which includes:

Reconciling discrepancies between the geodatabase and record drawings; Add missing or complete infrastructure features; and
Apply standard protocol to existing and new features.

It appears that the City' s recycled water system geodatabase has not been updated since receiving EKI' s dataset compiled for the previous Integrate Water Resources Master Plan ( IWRMP). EKI understands that the City will reach a separate decision on updating the recycled water system geodatabase.

The required edits and discrepancies for the water and wastewater systems are further described below.

DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CITY' S GEODATABASE AND RECORD DRAWINGS Discrepancies between the City' s geodatabase of the two systems( potable water and wastewater water) and the record drawings are noted in Attachment A for each record drawing. In general, the discrepancies include:

Inconsistent pipe sizes;
Duplicate datasets;
Missing system features and components; and
Missing status of systems features ( e. g., active, future, abandoned, or other[ private]). 167
Greg Gibson Q ( environment
City of Lathrop j water
20 October 2022

Page 2 of 7 ends

MISSING OR INCOMPLETE RECORDS IN THE CITY' S GEODATABASE Infrastructure in the southwest of River Islands ( RI) is not provided ( south of RI Pkwy and west of Dell Osso), but the development has been built based on Google aerial images. Per discussions during the September 29t`' meeting, EKI understands that plans for these areas have not been accepted by the City, however, the City will add infrastructure for these areas and note them as d raft.

As noted in Attachment A, it appears that record drawings for" Improvement Plans, Track 3811, Stanford Crossing" and " River Islands - Track 3839, Improvement Plans" are provided under two different tract number file names ( one file name contains the right tract number and one file name contains the wrong tract number [ e. g., under track numbers NH26 and Built Tract 3837, respectively]). This may imply that record drawings for NH2B and Built Tract 3837 may be missing and need to be added.

As noted in columns M and N in Attachment A, several record drawings provided by the City are not incorporated in the geodatabase.

Hydrant locations in the water system are missing in the southeast portion of River Islands.

STANDARD PROTOCOL
Several standard protocols are required for hydraulic model runs, which are described further below.

Unique ID System
New features added post 2019 does not follow the City' s unique ID naming convention developed by Stantec in 2013, which is an 11- digit ID comprised of a Grid ID, a code for the feature type, and a numerical ID. It is important that all new and existing features use this naming convention so that each feature has a unique ID and can be joined with the prior modeling features for a complete model.

Elevation Datum
Elevation recorded in the City' s geodatabase system is on a NAVG 29 datum. Data from record drawings that are not prepared using this datum needs to be converted.

Connectivity
It is recommended that the City establishes correct connectivity for new systems and newly added features. Particularly, pipelines should split at intersections, hydrant laterals, Ts, isolation valves, and control valves that are normally closed ( see example below; no need to split pipeline at surface laterals, blowouts, or other non- operational fittings).

EKI C20049. 01
168
Greg Gibson I
environment
City of Lathrop water
20 October 2022

Page 3 of 7 ends

tWQr R VIE W
E mine and fix th g c metry af m orted data
Lacate / ix N ci s in Clos Pro imity
x, K,
s +
u, r, w w,
Lacat t F Pip- Split Candidates
T
a
Lcx; te 1 F'tx Cic sir I I wt r5t,: tirr Pip
P e 311
u
Several pipelines in the wastewater system are not connected to their downstream network ( such as pump stations and pipes) ( see Attachment A).

Wastewater System Invert Elevations
Upstream and downstream invert elevations for every pipe that need to be populated. Currently, invert elevations for improvements added post- 2019 are only populated at manholes. However, one manhole may connect multiple pipes of different elevations and cannot represent the invert elevation and slope at each pipe.

Duplicative Datasets
It appears that multiple copies of the system exist in the geodatabase with differences in the information contained. For example:

Water System
Duplicate features exist in pw_ Mains. Per discussion during the meeting, EKI understands these duplicate features were added to reflect the final improvements accepted by the City. However, EKI C20049. 01
i
169
Greg Gibson environment
City of Lathrop water
20 October 2022

Page 4 of 7 ends

the City' s added features do not have necessary attributes such as Facility Identifier, Source, Grid_ No, Feature_ Type, ID, and Asset Status. EKI suggests that the City merge EKI' s attributes with the newly added features and delete duplicates as appropriate. Maintaining the same facility ID for the same feature would help us streamline system updates in the hydraulic model.

Sciurce Gred_Mn Feature_Type fD CurrentRepkacementCost AssetStatus Andy Kom J13 P VtdA i534< Mull> Actrre
rNulls < Nulb 4 dull> NuII < Nully Null>
a
w
5 x
a ti
e
1 z
e
r,. a.
s 3 i
s_.
4 ° fc
w,"
e
4 i:.:% °. .' s`" i v .., . ,., r , _
J- -' m
M
F iri 1 :' f`#: f, h +"} µ".+•.§+ ..
k s: s:'.:.= .
t„
O& IECTID' fuil' N# ntifror Install Date Wteriaf Piameter Water Type EnableA Active Flap Owned 8y ManapeA 8y Ust UpCatx Qate Last Etlf 45i4 J13PN61? fi534 1/ 12018 PaqrvinylChlefiGe B': PotebbWater Trut irue OurAgency OurAgency 6f1312017 EKLCP b0$ Q< Nulb 12f15J207fi FCIy: mylC lar e 8"; PCteCIe lFat^ r j True 7rue OurAgency OurAgency,< Nu6> eNUIb sya FL,*,`..'
Wastewater system
During the geodatabase update for the prior IWRMP, EKI superseded ss_ GravityMain and ss_ PressurizedMain with ss_ Main ( i. e., merged two layers into a single layer) and superseded ss_ Manhole and ss_ Fitting with ss_ Node. EKI merged these layers because the hydraulic model takes all pipelines, including gravity main and pressurized mains, as a single layer; and likewise for manholes and fittings. EKI provided the updated ss_ Main and ss_ Node layers to the City on 7 October 2020.

It appears that the City merged EKI' s updates with its original ss_ GravityMain, ss_ PressurizedMain, ss_ Manhole, ss_ Fitting layers, added post- 2019 improvements to these four layers, but kept EKI' s 2020 ss_ Main and ss_ Node layers in its geodatabase. The City should select one set of layers to update, delete duplicate layers, and reconcile the following:

The ss_ PressuredMain file is outdated and missing EKI' s 2020 updates. By a quick visual comparison, the following features are missing or not updated. EKI suggests the City conduct a comparison between the ss_ PressureMain and the ss_ Main file if the City wishes to continue updating the ss_ PressureMain layer.

EKI C20049. 01
170
Greg Gibson
I
environment
City of Lathrop water
20 October 2022

Page 5 of 7 ends

tG
i2"
r....
6„
r..
ra
24" g~
u.. , 6,
1 g ` ..« _.
f" .
9+ d $` o
s''" ` o
6 ..
a.

E
6 L. ia
1 a r
g.
a
f
k,^' b." ti
QS'.

GQ,
t•
iPs
p r,
f`' y
L 8" r .. if1 Wtr
w;$';' ,
y
R '
M S4 r g'
12tl $, ...,
W
4J
T2• i
m . Q
w 1
q
k
t*
ao<'$ CP°
a
s+*
iD .

IM`
4 s
12'
1 EKI C20049. 01
171
Greg Gibson
I
environment
City of Lathrop water
20 October 2022

Page 6 of 7 ends

roao.
a'">
a
a . , ..
c a 0 ;
o .

F
j .
m.
4 r` ,
a
k ;,: c t t-„
Improvements were added to the ss_ GravityMain, ss_ PressurizedMain, ss_ Manhole, and ss_ Fitting layers where there are duplicate datasets in the ss_ Main and ss_ Node. EKI understands that the added and updated features reflect the final improvements accepted by the City.

However, feature attributes including facility ID, status, and upstream and downstream invert EKI C20049. 01
172
Greg Gibson
I
environment
City of Lathrop water
20 October 2022

Page 7 of 7 ends

elevations are not added to the features. If the City wishes to continue updating the ss_ GravityMain, ss_ PressurizedMain, ss_ Manhole, and ss_ Fitting layers, EKI suggests that the City merge the facility IDs from the ss_ Main and ss_ Node layers and populate final upstream and downstream invert elevations in the features. Maintaining the same facility ID for the same feature would help us streamline system updates in the hydraulic model.

Attachments
Attachment A: Asbuilt Drawing Tracking Table( Electronic Copy) EKI C20049. 01
173
Client/ Address: City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive, eki environment
Lathrop, CA 95330 water
Proposal/ Agreement Date: 17 November 2022 EKI Proposal/ Project# C20094 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR EKI ENVIRONMENT& WATER, INC. 2 January 2022 Personnel Classification Hourlv Rate
Officer and Chief Engineer- Scientist 307
Principal Engineer- Scientist 296
Supervising I, Engineer- Scientist 286
Supervising II, Engineer- Scientist 276
Senior I, Engineer- Scientist 265
Senior II, Engineer- Scientist 255
Associate I, Engineer- Scientist 244
Associate II, Engineer- Scientist 230
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 1 214
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 2 202
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 3 185
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 4 165
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 5 145
Engineer- Scientist, Grade 6 128
Project Assistant 130
Technician 116
Senior GIS/ Database Analyst 150
CADD Operator/ GIS Analyst 133
Senior Administrative Assistant 147
Administrative Assistant 115
Secretary 96
Direct Expenses
Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work will be at cost plus ten percent( 10%) for items such as:
a. Maps, photographs, reproductions, printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work. b. Consultants, soils engineers, surveyors, drillers, laboratories, and contractors. c. Rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel, and subsistence. d. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. e. Outside computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work.

A Communication charge for e- mail access, web conferencing, cellphone calls, messaging and data access, file sharing, local and long distance telephone calls and conferences, facsimile transmittals, standard delivery U. S. postage, and incidental in- house copying will be charged at a rate of 4% of labor charges. Large volume copying of project documents, e. g., bound reports for distribution or project- specific reference files, will be charged as a project expense as described above.

Reimbursement for company- owned automobiles, except trucks and four- wheel drive vehicles, used in connection with the work will be at the rate of sixty cents($ 0. 60) per mile. The rate for company- owned trucks and four- wheel drive vehicles will be seventy- five cents($ 0. 75) per mile. There will be an additional charge of thirty dollars($ 30. 00) per day for vehicles used for field work. Reimbursement for use of personal vehicles will be at the federally allowed rate plus fifteen percent( 15%).

CADD Computer time will be charged at twenty dollars($ 20. 00) per hour. In- house material and equipment charges will be in accordance with the current rate schedule or special quotation. Excise taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense.

Rate for professional staff for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be at a rate of one and one- half times the Hourly Rates specified above.

The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the Agreement for the Services of EKI Environment& Water, Inc. and may be updated annually.
174
Attachment C- Budget Estimate for Proposed Scope of Work Geodatabase Update for the Lathrop IWRMP Amendment
City of Lathrop, California
EKI Labor Expenses Ti
LLi
a a ,
a
00 > E
E vi N al fo O. c
p
w
c c 2i s U CJ z
TASKS c c °° o c co J v .-. a
w fo w ro ic p Y
v
x
w w
fp C
Y
pp V J N J
v
0 O N C - - Q Q
lJ l7 l7 3 Q d Q a
V L O
F- U H
133 165 165 230 276
ask 1 U date Water 5 stem Geodatabase
Resolve discrepancies 16 1 2, 985 0 2, 985
Add missing features and records 8 40 6 1 9, 693 0 9, 693 Add hydrant locations 4 16 1 3, 586 0 3, 586
Apply unique ID system 6 1 1, 269 0 1, 269
Remove water system duplicate datasets 16 36 4 1 9, 635 0 9, 635 Project management and communications 6 4 2 2, 560 0 2, 560 Subtoial 28 0 120 16 S $ 29, 727 0 29, 700
ask 2 U date Wastewater S stem Geodatabase
Resolve discrepancies 16 1 2, 985 0 2, 985
Add missing features and records 16 64 8 1 $ 15, 396 320 16, 036 Apply unique ID system 6 1 1, 269 0 1, 269
Reconcile system elevation datum 6 2 1 1, 795 0 1, 795
Add wastewater system invert elevations 40 4 7, 821 0 7, 821 Remove wastewater system duplicate datasets 16 36 4 1 9, 635 0 9, 635 Project management and communications 6 6 2 3, 039 0 3, 039 Subtotal 32 174 0 26 5 $ 41, 939 300 42, 600
ask 3 U date Rec cled Water S stem Geodatabase
Update distribution system features( pipes, pumps) 4 1 926 0 926 Review and update ponds and spray fields 2 343 0 343
Review and update recycled water hydrant locations 8 1 1, 612 0 1, 612 Refine landscape irrigation areas in CLSP and Mossdale 16 24 8 2 8, 819 320 9, 459 Update total RI landscape irrigation acreage 8 4 2 2, 904 0 2, 904 Project management and communications 4 4 1 1, 930 0 1, 930 Subtotai 16 0 50 18 5 $ 16, 534 400 17, 200
OTAL: 76 174 170 60 15 $ 88, 200 700 89, 500
Notes:
1) A communications charge of 4% of labor costs covers e- mail access, web conferencing, cellphone calls, messaging and data access, file sharing, local and long distance telephone calls and conferences, facsimile transmittals, standard delivery U. S. postage, and incidental in- house copying. 2)" Other Direct Costs" includes direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work and will be reimbursed at cost plus ten percent 10%) for items such as:
a. Maps, photographs, reproductions, printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work. b. Consultants, soils engineers, surveyors, drillers, laboratories, and contractors. c. Rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. d. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. e. Outside computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work.

November 2022
C20049. 00 Page 1 of 2 EKI Environment& Water, Inc.
175
176
ITEM 4. 10

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) POLICE
LIEUTENANT AND ONE ( 1) ADDITIONAL SCHOOL

RESOURCE OFFICER FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AMEND COMMUNITY SERVICES

SUPERVISOR ) OB DESCRIPTION, AND APPROVE

RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Funding of One ( i) Lieutenant Position, One ( 1) Additional School
Resource Officer, Amending the 7ob Description of
the Community Service Supervisor, Amending the
Position Control Roster, and Approving the Related
Budget Amendment
CEQA STATUS: Not a Project as Defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines
SUMMARY:

The Lathrop Police Department launched on June 29, 2022 with 35 sworn police positions. Currently, the department runs 5 shifts that includes 1 Sergeant and 3 Officers per shift. The remaining positions include: 1 Chief, 2 Commanders, 3 K- 9 Officers, 3 School Resource Officers, 1 Community Resource Officer, 2 Detectives, 1 Detective Sergeant and 2 Traffic Officers. During the January 9, 2023 Council Meeting, the City Council approved an additional five ( 5) sworn officer positions and approved the extension of the Sworn Compensation Plan to 12/ 31/ 2023. The City Council also provided direction for staff to evaluate the current police department staffing structure and service levels to ensure the public receives high levels of customer service and community programs aimed to promote public safety and quality of life and bring back to Council for approval.

Staff has identified the need to add a Police Lieutenant and a School Resource Officer to our position roster. The police department is currently divided into two Divisions; Operations and Support Services, which are managed by Police Commanders reporting directly to the Chief of Police. The Operations Commander provides direction and leadership to patrol personnel and oversee critical administrative responsibilities such as staffing, scheduling, policy, etc. The request of the Police Lieutenant will add a mid- management level to the Operations Division. This position will have direct oversight to the department' s five ( 5) Patrol Sergeants and assist the Operations Commander with the day to day needs of the Patrol Unit operations.

Moreover, the Lieutenant will directly provide much needed mentorship, direction, and leadership to our supervisors allowing the Operations Commander to have better oversight of his entire division.
177
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) LIEUTENANT POSITION AND ONE ( 1)

ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMEND COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERVISOR 70B

DESCRIPTION, AND RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
Under the Support Services Division, the department currently has three ( 3) School Resource Officers ( SRO) that divide their time between six ( 6) K- 8 elementary schools and one ( 1) high school within city limits. With the opening of a second high school during this school year, an additional SRO position is being requested provide coverage to the new school site.

The estimated annual salary cost for the Police Lieutenant and School Resource Officer is $ 417, 000, the estimated one- time cost for a new vehicle is $ 70, 000 and 15, 000 for equipment and outfitting.

Additionally, the Community Services Supervisor job description is being amended to remove the P. C. 832 POST Certificate requirement, as this requirement is related to sworn classifications and is not required to perform the duties of the position.

Staff recommends Council authorize the funding of the Police Lieutenant and School Resource Officer from Measure C, amend the positon control roster, amend the Community Service Supervisor' sjob description, and approve related budget amendment. A budget amendment will be needed for Fiscal Year 2022/ 23 in the amount of $ 330, 000 ($ 235, 000 salaries ( 4 months) + $ 10, 000 signing bonus + 15, 000 equip + $ 70, 000 vehicle).

BACKGROUND:

At the March 22, 2021, Special City Council Meeting, Council directed staff to create Capital Improvement Project GG 21- 11, to begin the creation of the new Lathrop Police Department, and implement the transition of law enforcement services from the San Joaquin County Sheriff to the City.

The Lathrop Police Department launched on June 29, 2022, with 35 sworn police positions. Currently, the department runs 5 shifts that includes 1 Sergeant and 3 Officers per shift. The remaining positions include: 1 Chief, 2 Commanders, 3 K9 Officers, 3 School Resource Officers, 1 Community Resource Officer, 2 Detectives, 1 Detective Sergeant and 2 Traffic Officers.

During the January 9, 2023 Council Meeting, Council approved an additional five ( 5) sworn officer positions and provided direction to staff to evaluate if additional positions are needed in the police department to lower the response times for priority calls for service and ensure that there is sufficient coverage for the Lathrop community. Staff has identified the need for a Police Lieutenant and an additional School Resource Officer.
178
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) LIEUTENANT POSITION AND ONE ( 1)

ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMEND COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERVISOR , 70B

DESCRIPTION, AND RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
The department is currently divided into two Divisions: Operations and Support Services. The two major Divisions are overseen and managed by the Chief and the two Commanders. The Operations Division carries critical administrative responsibilities that are in addition to managing the different Units that include Patrol Unit, K- 9 Team, Drone Team, Traffic Unit, SWAT Team, Honor Guard Unit, Field Training Officers, Community Service Officers, and Animal Control Unit. The administrative responsibilities in the Operations Division include training, media and public engagement, conducting misconduct investigations, use of force investigations, various internal audits, and overseeing legislative changes that include the State' s Racial and Identity Profiling Act ( RIPA), Assembly Bill 481, and SB 2 Peace Officer Certification Civil Rights. The addition of the Police Lieutenant will allow for restructuring of the department supervision and add a mid- management rank to the Operations Division that will primarily oversee the Patrol Sergeants and provide direction, mentorship, and leadership to the different teams. This position will help to provide focus to the calls for service and lowering the critical priority response call times.

Under the Support Services Division, the police department currently has three ( 3) School Resource Officers ( SRO) that divide their time between the six ( 6) K- 8 elementary schools and one ( 1) high school within the City limits. With the opening of second high school in the upcoming 23/ 24 school year, an additional SRO position is needed to ensure that there is adequate coverage to protect the students at all Lathrop Schools.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Staff has identified the need to add one ( 1) Police Lieutenant and one ( 1) additional School Resource Officer. The Police Lieutenant will serve as the primary supervisor for the five ( 5) Patrol Sergeants and provide direction, mentorship, and leadership to the different teams in the Operations Division. This position will help to provide focus to the calls for service and lowering the critical priority response call times. With the opening of a new high school this school year, an additional School Resource Officer is needed to ensure that there is adequate staffing to protect the students in the Lathrop community. Additionally, the Community Services Supervisor job description is being amended to remove the P. C. 832 POST Certificate requirement, as this requirement is related to sworn classifications only. For those reasons, Staff recommends the City Council authorize the funding of one ( 1) Police Lieutenant and one ( 1) additional School Resource Officer positions from Measure C, amend the Position Control Roster, amend the Community Services Supervisor job description, and approve the related Budget Amendment.
179
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) LIEUTENANT POSITION AND ONE ( 1)

ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AMEND COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERVISOR JOB

DESCRIPTION, AND RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
CEQA STATUS:

Staff has determined that the item is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Staff requests City Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 330, 000 from Measure C Funds ( 1060) to the General Fund ( 1010). The overall fiscal impact for Fiscal Year 2022/ 23 is $ 330, 000, and the future expenses will be incorporated into the biennial budget process:

Increase Transfer Out
1060- 9900- 990- 9010 330, 000
Increase Transfer In
1010- 9900- 393- 000 330, 000
Increase Expenditures
1010- 4030- 410- 1100 Salaries 235, 000
1010- 4030- 410- 1150 Signing Bonus 10, 000
1010- 4030- 430- 3700 Equipment 15, 000
1010- 4030- 450- 3000 Vehicles 70, 000
ATTACHMENTS:

A. A Resolution Authorizing the Funding of One ( 1) Police Lieutenant, One ( 1) Additional School Resource Officer, Amending the Community Service Supervisor Job Description, Amending the Position Control Roster, and Approving Related Budget Amendment
B. Amended Position Control Roster 02/ 13/ 2023
C. Amended Community Service Supervisor Job Description 180
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 5
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) LIEUTENANT POSITION AND ONE ( 1)

ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT
APPROVALS:
z -3
Raymond Bechler Date
Police Chief
Cari Jam ' Date
Director Finance
c- ___
Z f'
r-`
Z4 z_
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
FoR Z" 9- 2ot3
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
181
RESOWTION NO. 23 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP AUTHORIZING THE FUNDING OF ONE ( 1) LIEUTENANT POSITION, ONE ( 1)

ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER, AMENDING THE JOB

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICE SUPERVISOR, AMENDING THE

POSITION CONTROL ROSTER, AND APPROVING THE RELATED BUDGET

AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the Lathrop Police Department launched on June 29, 2022, with 35 sworn police positions; and
WHEREAS, currently the department runs 5 shifts that includes 1 Sergeant and 3 Officers per shift. The remaining positions include: 1 Chief, 2 Commanders, 3 K- 9 Officers, 3 School Resource Officers, 1 Community Resource Officer, 2 Detectives, 1 Detective Sergeant and 2 Traffic Officers; and WHEREAS, during the January 9, 2023 Council Meeting, the City Council approved an additional five ( 5) sworn officer positions and approved the extension of the Sworn Compensation Plan to 12/ 31/ 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council provided direction for staff to evaluate the current police department staffing structure and service levels to ensure the public receives high levels of customer service and community programs aimed to promote public safety and quality of life; and
WHEREAS, staff has identified the need to add a Police Lieutenant and an additional School Resource Officer; and
WHEREAS, the department is currently divided into two Divisions: Operations and Support Services, which are managed by Police Commanders reporting directly to the Chief of Police; and
WHEREAS, the request of the Police Lieutenant will add a mid- management level position to the Operations Division, this position will have direct oversight of the five ( 5) Patrol Sergeants and assist the Operations Commander with the day-to- day needs of the Patrol Unit operations ; and
WHEREAS, the department currently has three ( 3) School Resource Officers SRO) that divide their time between six ( 6) K- 8 elementary schools and one ( 1) high school within city limits; and
WHEREAS, with the opening of a second high school, an additional SRO position is being requested to provide coverage to the new school site; and WHEREAS, the estimated annual salary cost for the Police Lieutenant and School Resource Officer is $ 417, 000, the estimated one- time cost for a new vehicle is $ 70, 000, $ 15, 000 for equipment and outfitting; and 182
WHEREAS, the two positions will be funded from Measure C ( Fund 1060); and WHEREAS, the Community Services Supervisor job description is being amended to remove the P. C. 832 POST Certificate requirement, as this requirement is related to for sworn classifications and it is not required to perform the duties of the position; and
WHEREAS, the activity is not a Project as defined in Article 20, § 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve the following budget amendment transferring $ 330, 000 from Measure C Funds ( 1060) to the General Fund ( 1010) for FY 22/ 23 to fund the Police Lieutenant position and the additional School Resource Officer, amend the Community Service Supervisor' sjob description, and amend the Position Control Roster to include these positions:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS O FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 184

ATTACHMENT B
Budget for Fiscal Year 22/ 23
2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Adopted 11/ 08/ 21 03/ 14/ 22 OS/ 16/ 22 07/ 11/ 22 10/ 10/ 22 01/ 09/ 23 02/ 13/ 23

CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney
Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 City Attorney 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Legal Secretary 0. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Senior Adminlstrative Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00
CITY ATTORNEY- Total 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00

CITY CLERK
City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Director of Government Services/ City Clerk 0. 50 0. 50 0.50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0.50 0.50 Total 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50
CITY CLERK- Total 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50 1. 50

CITY MANAGER
City Manager
Assistant City Manager 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 25 O. ZS 0. 25 0. 25 0. 25 City Englneer 0. 15 0. 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 City Manager 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Director of Government Services/ Clty Clerk 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 Economic Development Administrator 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 2. 65 2. 65 2. 50 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75
CITY MANAGER- Total 2. 65 2. 65 2. 50 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75 2. 75

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning
Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0.33 0. 33 0. 33 Assistant Community Development Director 0. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Associate Planner 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Director of Community Development 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Executive Assistant 0. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Principal Planner 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Senior Administrative Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Senior Planner 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 4. 33 4. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33
COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT- Total 4. 33 4. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 5. 33 Attachment B
185
Budget for Fiscal Year 22/ 23
2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Adopted 11/ 08/ 21 03/ 14/ 22 05/ 16/ 22 07/ 11/ 22 10/ 10/ 22 01/ 09/ 23 02/ 13/ 23

FINANCE
Finance
Accountant I/ II 1. 00 2. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Accounting Manager 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Accounting Specialist I/ II/ Technician 5. 00 5. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Administrative Technician I/ II 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Customer Service Representatives I/ II 0. 00 0. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 Customer Service Supervisor 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Deputy Finance Director 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Director of Finance 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Finance Manager 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Management Analyst I/ II 0. 50 0. 50 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Senior Administrative Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Senior Customer Service Representative 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Senior Accountant 0. 00 0. 00 0. 50 0.50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 0. 50 Senior Management Analyst 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 13. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 FINANCE- Total 13. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50 14. 50

HUMAN RESOURCES
Human Reso rces
Human Resources Director 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Human Resources Manager 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 HR Analyst I/ II 0. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 HR Technician 0.00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Total 2. 00 3. 00 3. 00 4.00 4.00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00
HUMANRESOURCES- Total 2. 00 3. 00 3. 00 4.00 4. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Information Technology
Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 0. 50 0. 50 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Director of Information Systems 0. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Chief Information Officer 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Information Technology Technician 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Information Technology Engineer I/ II/ III 3. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 Management Analyst I/ II 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 4. 50 6. 50 8. 00 8. 00 8. 00 9. 00 9. 00 9. 00
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY- Totai 4. 50 6. 50 8. 00 8. 00 8. 00 9. 00 9. 00 9. 00

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Sworn
Police Chief 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Police Commander 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Police Officer 19. 50 19. 50 19. 50 21. 50 21. 50 21. 50 26. 50 26. 50 Police Sergeant 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 Total 27. 50 27. 50 27. 50 29. 50 29. 50 29. 50 34. 50 34. 50 Non- Sworn
Crime& Intelligence Analyst 0. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Police Records Assistant I/ II 0. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Attachment B
186
Budget for Fiscal Year 22/ 23
2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Adopted 11/ O8/ 21 03/ 14/ 22 OS/ 16/ 22 07/ 11/ 22 10/ 10/ 22 O1/ 09/ 23 02/ 13/ 23 Police Records Supervisor 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Property& Evidence Technician 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 0. 00 5. 00 4. 00 4. 00 4. 00 4. 00 4.00 4. 00
Administration
Management Analyst I/ II 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Executive Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Senior Adminlstrative Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Total 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00
Community Services Division
Community Services Supervlsor 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Community Services Officer I/ II/ III 3. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 5. 00 Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 0.50 0.50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Animal Shelter Supervisor 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Animal Services Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 Total 5. 50 7. 50 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 8. 00 8. 00 8. 00
POLICEDEPARTMENT- Total 36. 00 43. 00 40. 50 41. 50 41. 50 43. 50 48. 50 48. 50

MEASURE C
Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Deputy Dir of Parks, Recreation and Maint. Servic 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Recreation Leader 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 Senior Recreation Leader 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 3. 90 3. 90 2. 90 2. 90 2. 90 2. 90 2. 90 2. 90
Essential City Services- Contract Staff
Deputy Sherlff II 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for Community Impact 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for Investigations 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for School Resource Off 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II Patrol 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Sergeant to serve as Supervisor 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Total 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
Essential City Services- Police Department
Police Officer 4. 50 4. 50 4. 50 4.50 4. 50 4. 50 4. 50 5. 50 Police Sergeant 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Police Lieutenant 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 Total 5. 50 5. 50 5. 50 5. 50 5. 50 5. 50 5. 50 7. 50
Lathrop Manteca Fire District
Battalion Chlefs 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 1. 98 Firefighters/ Engineers 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 Total 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98
MEASURE C- Total 17. 38 17. 38 16. 38 16. 38 16. 38 16. 38 1638 18. 38 Attachment B
187
Budget for Fiscal Year 22/ 23
2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Amended Adopted 11/ 08/ 21 03/ 14/ 22 05/ 16/ 22 07/ 11/ 22 10/ 10/ 22 O1/ 09/ 23 02/ 13/ 23

PARKS, RECREATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Parks and Recreatio
Adminlstrative Assistant I/ II/ III 1. 00 1. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Uirector of f' arks, Kecreation and Maintenance Se 1. UU 1. UU 1. UU 1. 1JU 1. UU l.UU 1. UU l.UU Management Analyst I/ II 1. 25 1. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Recreation Coordinator 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 Recreation Leaders 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 8. 55 Recreation Manager 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Recreation Supervisor 1. 00 1. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Senior Accountant 0.00 0. 00 0. 25 0. 25 0.25 0. 25 0. 25 0. 25 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Senior Recreation Leaders 4. 35 4. 35 4. 35 4. 35 5. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 Total 20. 15 20. 15 22. 15 22. 15 22. 80 24. 80 24. 80 24. 80 Maintenance Services
Landscape and Irrigation Specialist 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Maintenance Services Supervisor 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Maintenance Worker I/ II/ III 9. 00 10. 00 10. 00 10.00 9. 00 9. 00 9. 00 9. 00 Parks and facilities Manager 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Streets and Maintenance Operation Manager 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 10. 00 11. 00 13. 00 13. 00 13. 00 13. 00 13. 00 13. 00 PARKS, RECREATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES- 30. 15 31. 15 35. 15 35. 15 35. 80 37. 80 37. 80 37. 80

PUBLIC SAFETY
Administration
Management Analyst I/ II 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Police Services Manager 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 Total 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00
Contract Staff
Chief of Police 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for Com Resource Off 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for Investigations 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 Deputy Sheriff II for Patrol 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Deputy Sheriff II for School Resource Off 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Lieutenant to serve as Supervisor 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Sergeant to serve as Supervisor 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Total 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00
PUBLIC SAFETY- Total 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00

PUBLIC WORKS
Building
Administrative Assistant I/ II/ III 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 0. 33 Assistant City Manager 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 32 0. 32 0.32 0.32 0. 32 Building Inspector I/ II/ III 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 Chief Building Official 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Permit and Plan Check Supervisor 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Permit Technician 2. 00 2. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 4. 00 4. 00 4. 00 Total 6. 33 6. 33 7. 33 7. 65 7. 65 9. 65 9. 65 9. 65
Attachment B
188
Budget for Fiscal Year 22/ 23
2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 2022/ 23 Amended Amended Amended Amended Ame ded Amended Amended Adopted 11/ 08/ 21 03/ 14/ 22 OS/ 16/ 22 07/ 11/ 22 10/ 10/ 22 01/ 09/ 23 02/ 13/ 23 Public Works
Adminlstrative Assistant I/ II 234 234 234 2. 34 2. 34 2. 34 2. 34 234 Assistant City Manager 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 43 0. 43 0. 43 0. 43 0.43 Assistant Engineer 1. 00 1. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 3. 00 Associate Engineer 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 City Engineer 0. 85 0. 85 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Construction Inspector I/ II 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Construction Inspector III 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Construction Superintendent 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Director of Public Works 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Executive Assistant 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Land Development Manager 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Management Analyst I/ II 0. 25 0. 25 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Meter Reader 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 00 Senior Accountant 0. 00 0. 00 0.25 0. 25 0. 25 0. 25 0. 25 0.25 Seniorl dministr tivc Assist nt 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 Senior Civil Engineer 1. 00 1. 00 2. 00 2. 00 2. 0 7. 00 00 0 Senior Construction Manager 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Utility Operations Superintendent 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Utllity Operator I/ II/ III 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 6. 00 Utility Plant Manager 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Total 24. 44 24. 44 26. 59 26. 02 26. 02 27. 02 27. 02 27. 02 PUBLIC WORKS- Total 30. 77 30. 77 33. 92 33. 67 33. 67 36. 67 36. 67 36. 67 r r
P
Total City Staff Positions 137. 80 149. 80 155. 80 157. 80 158. 45 165. 45 170. 45 172. 45 Total Contractual Positions 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 7. 98 s-. •. w
Attachment B
189
ATTaCHNlENT " C "
rr.

City ofLathrop
Community Services Supervisor

CITY OF LATHROP
COMMUNITY 5ERVICES SUPERVISOR
Clue s sprcifications are only iu ended to present a descriptive a ummary of the mnge ojduties und rrsponsibilities assoeiutrd witti specified positions Therejore, speeifieations mav not inelude ul/ duties prrjormed by iudividuals wrthin u claxsifieution.! n addiliwn, syecificalions ure intrndrd to ouUine the mrnimum qua(ificarions nrceswry jo enhy inm thr• lass urod do nol necrssarity convey tbe qualificatinns o ineumbents within the position.

DEFINITION:

Under general direction, administers, plans, organizes the day- to- day operations of the Neighborhood& Community Services Department_ Division, which includes Animal Services, Code Compliance, and Community Services Divisions. Identifies workflow improvements, resolves customer service issues, prepares and monitors contracts and RFP' s, and serves as a technical resource to other City personnel.

Attends various meetings as a representative of the City. Responsibilities include overseeing compliance operations related with Federal, State and local ordinances and laws; oversees staff managing community outreach programs and educational services related to various community services in support of assigned divisions; performs complex inspections of residential, commercial, and industrial properties and transient businesses to determine compliance with applicable federal, state, and local codes, laws, regulations, and ordinancesrelating to maintenance of properties and srivctures and business licensing; initiates enforcement action andissues citations and notices; supervises special projects; coordinates the City' s contracts far the sheltering, care and treatment of animals; provides work direction and lead supervision; performs other related duties as required by the department head, or his or her designee.

DISTINGUISHINC CHARACTERISTICS:

The Community Services Supervisar is a single position classification in which the inctunbent is expected to perform the full scope of supervisory duties and provide technical and general advice and guidance to subordinates.

SUPERV[ SION RECEIVED/ EXERCISED:

Receives d'uection and supervision from the assigned Department Head. r I, i u::., Deleted: irection and superv s on may also come erom he City Manager, his or her designee or assigned
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: ( include but are not[ imited to the fol[ owin eparu e t Heaa.

Animal Services Division
Knowledge of techniques, principals and procedures for planning, scheduling, assigning, evaluating and monitoring daily activities and operations of animal services, activities and field work; reports to I he a, si n_ I dcpartmen hcu l or ir dc, i_ nr r_ periodically on individual and team work Deleted: CommaniryServicesSupervisor, accomplishments, problems, work processes and training needs. Deleted: assigned deparnnent head Knowledge and responsible for enforcement of Federal, State and City laws, codes, ordinances, policies and procedures relevant to animal services to include the use of annnal services procedures, humane treatment and handling of animals; knowledge of proper use of relevant equipment, secure storage and disposal ofcontrolled substances and supplies.

Responds to and monitors calls for service from the public; impommds an'vnals and delivers them to the animal shelter; ensures compliance with established safety practices and procedures. 1 190
s
t
t^ t' i";,i. ... L. A;ta. i s, m' W ...

City ofLathrop
Community Services Supervisor
Knowledge of interviewing and investigative techniques, procedures, and principals, issuance of citations and warning notices, and practices of proper case management. Prepares and maintains records and reports; writes and submits reports for prosecution, appears and testifies in court serves as an expert witness in court on matters pertaining to violations of animal conlrol laws.

Conducts humane and dangerous animal investigations or assists investigations performed by other officers; recommends actions to be taken by the deparhment regarding the continued maintenance of declared dangerous dogs; impounds repeat offending dangerous dogs and/ or issues citations to owners/ custodians.

Responds to and investigates complaints concerning possible violations of annnal control laws. Issues citations for violations of animal control and licensing laws.

Captures and impounds stray, injured, unlicensed, aggressive, or biting animals, euthanizes severely injured animals in the field, as pennitted by law; properly cares for unpounded or quarantined anunals; releases animals under appropriate circumstances. Consults with veterinarians regazding the proper treatment of injured or ill anunals; euthanizes annnals and maintains records of the euthanizations.

Assists the public in retrieving or adopting animals; picks up and disposes of deceased animals; provides public education and events on pet owner responsibilities and safe and humane methods of animal care; addresses citizens' concerns involving complaints; conducts repeat investigations of nuisance complaints; attempts to remedy or correct problems in a positive and safe manner; answers questions regarding animal services regulations.

Code Compliance Division
Knowledge of techniques, principals and procedures for planning, scheduling, assigning, evaluating and monitoring daily activities and operations of code compliance services, activities and field work; reports to Community Services Supervisor, or assigned department head periodically on individual and team work accomplishments, problems, work processes and training needs.

Knowledge and responsible for enforcement of Federal, State and City laws, codes, ordinances, policies and procedures relevant to Uniform Housing Codes and municipal codes to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the public; keeps informed of changes and new legislation pertaining to municipal codes and related regulations.

Interprets codes and regulations; explains required inspections and construction requirements; advises owners on matters related to building pennits; investigates and resolves building and related complaints; maintains records and files of inspections made and actions taken.

Conducts field inspections to check for code violations, including building, zoning, ordinances, weed abatement, and business licensing; conducts inspections of existing buildings to determine hazazdous conditions; prepares waming letters to negligent owners or coniractors, and carries negligent cases through prosecution in situaUons of non- compliance; coordinates activities with other departments and outside agencies; writes citations as necessary.

Investigates more complex nuisance complaints and addresses public questions; meets with owners or residents; prepares related correspondence; looks for construction or alterations being performed without proper building permits.

Drafts recommendations for changes in inspection related policies; prepares building inspection and code compliance reports; prepares legal fonns and correspondence; makes presentations to staff, committees, and the public.
2 191
y'''
City of Lathrop
Communiry Services Supervisor
Communitv Services Division
Knowledge of techniques, principals and procedures for planning, scheduling, assigning, evaluating and monitoring daily activities and operations of community services, activities and public safety field work; reports to department head periodically on individual and team work accomplishments, problems, work processes and training needs.

Manages the development, operation, coordination, and execution of community services programs; the organization and conduct of special events and/ or programs related to public satety outreach; and specialized community services programs and services for groups or individuals; and performs related work as assigned. Such as, but not limited to: Youth Programs( Drug Abuse Resistance Education D. A. R. E.), Youth Academy, Every 15 minutes, Bicycle Rodeos, and Partnership with Youth Advisory Committee), Community Engagement Programs ( Citizen' s Academy, Neighborhood Watch, National Night Out, Beautification Day, DEA Drug Take Back, Senior Awareness Programs, and Ride- Along- Program) and participate in other assigned Community Events in conjunction with Police Services and Parks& Recreation.

Coordinates with internal departments, regional agencies, the public, community, and professional groups to promote community services programs and educational outreach materials on various public safety topics.

PHYSICAL, MENTAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING CONDIT[ONS:

Position requires prolonged sitting, standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, squatting, and stooping in the performance of daily office activities. The position also requires grasping, repetitive hand movement, and fine coordination in preparing reports and data using a computer keyboard.

Additionally, the position requires near and faz vision in reading correspondence and statistical data and using a computer. Acute hearing is required when providing phone and personal service. The need to lift, drag and push files, paper and documents weighing up to 25 pounds, as well as speech sufficient to communicate in group settings without the aid of a microphone, is also required.

Some of these requirements may be accommodated for otherwise qualified individuals requiring and requesting such accommodations.

QUALIFICATIONS: ( The following are minimal qua[ iftcations necessary for entry into the classification.)
Education and/ or Exaerience:

Any combination of education and experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abiliry necessary for a Community Services Supervisoc A typical way of obtaining the required qualifications is to possess the equivalent of:

Five years of technical experience in either the Animal Services, Code Coinpliance or Community Services Division for public safety, with at least two years of supervisory experience; and a high school diploma or equivalent. A bachelor' s degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in human services, senior services, recreation, public administration, public safety or related field is highly desirable.
3 192
e r,. t yx , .;-
a$'.:,' , a.;' ik.-..,i` S . t' r:

City ofLathrop
Community Services Supervisor
License/ Certificate:

Possession of a valid Class C California Driver' s License is required and must be maintained during the entire term of employment in the job class; failure to possess or maintain the valid required license shall result in discipline up to and including termination of employment.

Successful completions of First Aid& CPR certification courses within six( 6) months of employment.

Possession of, or the abiliry to obtain, a child abuse reporting certificate( Penal Code 11166. 5), one( 1) year of employment.

Possession of, or the ability to obtain, Basic Code Enforcement Module completion certificate( Intemational Code Council), within one( 1) year of employment.

NOWLEDGE/ ABILITIES/ SKILLS( The fol[owing are a representative sample ofthe KAS' s Deleted•<#> Possession of, or[ he ability to ob[ ain, a ' necessaryto perform essentia! duties of the position.) RG 832 P.O.S. T Certificate issued by the State of Califomia, within eighteen( 18) monihs of
KnOwledg¢ of: employment.¶
Modem principles, practices and techniques of supervision in the public sector; municipal records management and elections; basic principles of mathematics; applicable federal, state and local laws, codes and regulations; methods and techniques of scheduling work assignments; standard office procedures, practices and equipment; modem office practices, methods and techniques for rewrd keeping and report preparation and writing; proper English, spelling and grammar; occupational hazards and standard safety practices.

Abilitv to:

Learn Califomia statutory law as it pertains to incidents commonly documented and/ or encountered by Community Services Officers. Provide information and organize material in compliance with laws, regulations, policies and procedures; periodically attend evening or weekend meetings as required; perform mathematical calculations quickly and accurately; interpret, explain and apply applicable laws, codes and regulations; read, interpret and record data accurately; organize, prioritize and follow- up on work assignments; wark independently and as part of a team; make sound decisions within established guidelines; analyze a complex issue, and develop and implement an appropriate response; follow written and oral directions; observe safety principles and work in a safe manner; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; establish and maintain effective working relationships. Ability to establish positive working relationships with representatives of community organizations, state/ local agencies and associations, City management, staffand the public.
lcill. t4:

Operate an office computer systems, hardware and a variety of word processing and software applications; operate a variety of automated record keeping systems, standard office procedures and ability to clean and maintain assigned City vehicles and equipment.

HISTORIC: L D: A" t. 1
mendc i: f- cbruary I3.' U3 i bv R sulution:_' 3-
Adonted: June 3, 2021 bv Resol ttion 21- 3885
FLSA Status: Exempt
Bargainin Unit LMCEA
4 193
194
ITEM 4. 11

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: AUTHORIZE TASK ORDER NO. 6 WITH KNN PUBLIC

FINANCE FOR MUNICIPAL ADVISORY SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Task Order No. 6 With KNN Public Finance for Municipal Advisory Services
Related to the Potential Refinancing of Mossdale
Village Refunding 2013 Series A
CEQA STATUS: Not a Project as defined in Article 20, § 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA)
Guidelines
SUMMARY:

In recent months, Staff has completed a refinancing analysis for the Mossdale Village Refinancing 2013, Series A ( Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing). Current market conditions are such that the 2013 Bonds can be refinanced by the issuance of refunding bonds that will have a lower interest rate and cause a corresponding reduction of debt service payments. The existing obligations currently consist of approximately $ 12. 9 million in outstanding principal, has a final maturity date of September 2, 2035 and has an average remaining interest rate of 5. 57%.

Based on a current market analysis, the City has the opportunity to refinance the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. Based on current and recent market conditions, it is estimated that a refinancing would have net present value savings ( NPV), net of issuance costs, of approximately $ 1. 1 to $ 1. 5 million and an average annual savings per household of $ 63 to $ 82 for property located in both districts.

In order to begin the refinancing process, the City needs to obtain professional assistance in the form of financial advisory services. The City has worked with KNN Public Finance ( KNN) on many bond issuances and refinancings in the past and they are very familiar with the City. KNN has submitted Task Order No. 6 to provide Municipal Advisory Services to the City and assist with the refinancing of the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. Task Order No. 6 includes three ( 3) financing options:

1. Direct Purchase/ Private Placement - $ 61, 500

2. Public Offering without credit rating - $ 76, 500

3. Public OfFering with credit rating - $ 86, 500
All three options will be reviewed and the City will select the best option that maximizes savings and/ or locks in savings sooner, thereby reducing the risk that the expected savings level can' t be achieved due to the potential for deteriorating market conditions. The authorization to proceed with the transaction and the related documents will come back to the City Council for approval at a later date. 195
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE TASK ORDER NO. 6 WITH KNN PUBLIC FINANCE
Staff recommends Council authorize Task Order No. 6 with KNN to provide Municipal Advisory Services related to the potential refinancing of the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. The fees above are contingent upon the successful pricing and closing of the transactions. All fees will be included in the cost of issuance fund funded from the proceeds of the debt refinancing.

BACKGROUND:

In 2003, the City issued Mossdale Village Community Facilities District ( CFD) 2003- 1 and Mossdale Assessment District 03- 1, Series 2003 ( Mossdale Village Refinancing).

The CFD portion of the debt was issued to construct the Mossdale Landing and the Lathrop Station Urban Design Concept Projects share of the water delivery system established under the South County Surface Water Supply Project ( SCSWSP) and the delivery of potable water facilities from the City' s wells, including transmission and delivery facilities. The AD portion of the debt was to finance infrastructure improvements in the Mossdale Village area including: offsite water supply, recycled water supply, sewer collection and storm drain piping, a 750, 000 gallon per day membrane biological reactor wastewater treatment facility, ofFsite storm drain outfalls and retention and detention basins, a common water storage tank and a common sanitary sewer pumping station as well as all appurtenances and utility improvements necessary to support the infrastructure.

In 2013, the City refinanced both the Mossdale CFD and the Mossdale AD ( Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing). The refinancing had a net present value savings ( NPV) of

1. 03 million and saved residents an average of $ 49 per year.

Based on a current market analysis, there is an opportunity to once again refinance the CFD and AD. Depending on market conditions, it is estimated that a refinancing will have NPV savings of approximately $ 1. 1 to $ 1. 5 million and an average annual savings per household of $ 63 to $ 82. The economics of the refinancing are also impacted by the fact that the 2013 bonds can be redeemed early with no redemption premium starting on September 2, 2023. In order to take advantage of no early redemption premium and to issue the refinancing bonds as tax- exempt, the refinancing bonds can close no sooner than early June.

There are many steps necessary to complete this transaction. Staff is targeting the following dates:

1. March 13, 2023 Council Meeting - Council to approve SB 1029 general debt policy

2. May 8, 2023 Council Meeting - Council to approve Refinancing

3. Early June 2023 - Close on Refinancing
196
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE TASK ORDER NO. 6 WITH KNN PUBLIC FINANCE
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The results of the refinancing will assist with the goal of keeping assessments rates stable for residents.

CEQA STATUS:

Staff has determined that the item is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Based on recent and current market conditions, it is estimated that a refinancing will have NPV savings of $ 1. 1 to $ 1. 5 million and an average annual savings per household of $ 63 to $ 82.

ATTAC H M E NTS:

A. Resolution Authorizing Task Order No. 6 With KNN Public Finance for Municipal Advisory Services Related to the Potential Refinancing of Mossdale Village Refunding 2013 Series A
B. Task Order No. 6 Agreement for Municipal Advisory Services KNN Public Finance
197
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUTHORIZE TASK ORDER NO. 6 WITH KNN PUBLIC FINANCE
APPROVALS:

I)
I
P aCari James; D te
Director of;Fin nce
Z- 7 ? z
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
r 2•' 23
Ste en J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
198
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP AUTHORIZING TASK ORDER NO. 6 WITH KNN PUBLIC FINANCE FOR

MUNICIPAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATED TO THE POTENTIAL
REFINANCING OF MOSSDALE VILLAGE REFUNDING 2013 SERIES A WHEREAS, in 2003, the City issued Mossdale Village Community Facilities District ( CFD) 2003- 1 and Mossdale Assessment District 03- 1, Series 2003 ( Mossdale Village Refunding); and
WHEREAS, the CFD portion of the debt was issued to construct the Mossdale Landing and the Lathrop Station Urban Design Concept Projects share of the water delivery system established under the South County Surface Water Supply Project ( SCSWSP) and the delivery of potable water facilities from the City' s wells, including transmission and delivery facilities; and
WHEREAS, the AD portion of the debt was to finance infrastructure improvements in the Mossdale Village area including: offsite water supply, recycled water supply, sewer collection and storm drain piping, a 750, 000 gallon per day membrane biological reactor wastewater treatment facility, offsite storm drain outfalls and retention and detention basins, a common water storage tank and a common sanitary sewer pumping station as well as all appurtenances and utility improvements necessary to support the infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, in 2013, the City refinanced both the Mossdale CFD and the Mossdale AD ( Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing). The refinancing had a net present value savings ( NPV) of $ 1. 03 million and saved residents an average of $ 49 per year; and
WHEREAS, based on a current market analysis, the City has the opportunity to refinance the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. Based on current and recent market conditions, it is estimated that a refinancing will have a net present value savings ( NPV) of $ 1. 1 to $ 1. 5 million and an average annual savings per household of $ 63 to $ 82 for property located in both districts; and
WHEREAS, in order to begin the refinancing process, the City needs to obtain professional assistance in the form of financial advisory services.

The City has worked with KNN Public Finance ( KNN) on many bond issuances and refinancings in the past and they are very familiar with the City; and WHEREAS, KNN has submitted Task Order No. 6 to provide Municipal Advisory Services to the City and assist with the refinancing of the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. Task Order No. 6 includes three ( 3) financing options:

Resolution No. 23- Page 1 of 3
199

1. Direct Purchase/ Private Placement - $ 61, 500

2. Public Offering without credit rating - $ 76, 500

3. Public Offering with credit rating - $ 86, 500
WHEREAS, all three options will be reviewed and the City will select the best option that maximizes savings and/ or locks in savings sooner, thereby reducing the risk that the expected savings level can' t be achieved due to the potential for deteriorating market conditions. The authorization to proceed with the transaction and the related documents will come back to the City Council for approval at a later date.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby authorize Task Order No. 6 with KNN to provide Municipal Advisory Services related to the potential refinancing of the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing. The fees above are contingent upon the successful pricing and closing of the transactions. All fees will be included in the cost of issuance fund funded from the proceeds of the debt refinancing.

Resolution No. 23- Page 2 of 3
200
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13t" day of February, 2023, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Resolution No. 23- Page 3 of 3
201
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69 D3737- C 5B- 1752- 8336- 4A0$ 98P1G603 e.
public finance
Task Order No. 6 Pursuant to Master Agreement, Dated November 18, 2003 for
Municipal Advisory Services
THIS TASK ORDER N0. 6, dated as of the _ day of February, 2023 by and between CITY OF LATHROP, hereinafter" City° and KNN PUBLIC FINANCE, LLC, hereinafter" KNN".

WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City desires municipai financial advisory services in connection with the potential refinancing of the existing Lathrop Financing Authority Revenue Bonds ( Mossdale Village Refundings), 2013 Series A (" Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing"). The existing obligations currently consist of approximately $ 12. 91 million in outstanding principal, have a final maturity of September 2, 2035 and may be redeemed at the option of the City on any date at with a 30 day redemption notice, without an early redemption premium, beginning on September 2, 2023. The existing obligations do not have a credit rating from one of the major bond credit rating agencies. The City desires to pursue the Mossdale CFD/AD Refinancing in order to achieve debt service savings and, as a result, reduce the annual special taxes levied on the property within Community Facilities District No. 2003- 1 ( Mossdale Village) and the annual assessment installments levied on the property within in Reassessment District No. 2013- 1 ( Mossdale Village).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City and KNN agree as follows:

1. KNN acknowledges that it has a fiduciary duty to the City and agrees to act in the City' s best interests. KNN agrees to work cooperatively with the City and other financing professionals to help execute and successfully complete the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing, including services as needed specified in Exhibit A of this Agreement.

2. KNN hereby confirms that it is registered as a municipal advisor with the Securities Exchange Commission and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ( the " MSRB"). Under MSRB Rule G- 23, KNN will not serve as underwriter for any bonds to be issued in a financing for which we are acting as the City' s Municipal Advisor.

3. The City agrees that in consideration for the foregoing services to be performed by KNN, the City will do the following:
a) The City will cooperate with KNN and will provide all information which is reasonably required to enable KNN to fulfill its duties to the City. b) The City will pass such ordinances and resolutions and perform such reasonable acts as may be necessary to assure compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and constitutional provisions pertaining to the issuance of its securities and other related services. 2054 University Acenue, Suite 300 I Aerkeley, CA 94704 Ibfain 510- 839- 8200 5901 West Century Boulecazd, Suitc 750 I,os Angeles, CA 90045 I 1ain 310- 348- 2901 Ar A
rH1,
E;, M
202
DocuSi n Envslcp i: 69BD3737- CC 8-4752-9336-4A0888A1 803 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 2 of 7 ends

c) The City will pay KNN for services herein outlined and other services incidental hereto in accordance with Exhibit B of this Agreement.

4. KNN' s services consist solely in providing expert and experienced assistance to municipalities as a Municipal Advisor and consultant. KNN does not render any legal, accounting or actuarial advice.

5. This Agreement is subject to the terms of the Master Agreement for Financial Advisory Services dated November 18, 2003, as subsequently amended, between the City and KNN and shall be deemed a Task Order under said Master Agreement.

6. This Agreement may be cancelled by either party upon 30 days written notices. Costs incurred by and fees due KNN for services performed prior to the cancellation date sha l be due and payable upon submission of an invoice.

7. This Agreement shall end on the closing date of the bond transaction, unless otherwise discontinued per the provision described above, or extended by mutual agreement. Any extension notice shall stipulate the AgreemenYs revised expiration date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, KNN staff shall remain availabfe to the City staff after the bond closing to answer routine questions regarding the refinancing, as provided in Exhibit A.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF LATHROP
By
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date:

Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney
Date: ZZ-r' -' 3

KNN PUBLIC FINANCE, LLC
DoeuSigned by:
gy °
u"' j°
Dan Cox, Director
1/ 31/ 2023
Date:
2054 Uni- ersity Acenue, Suite 300 I Berkeley, CA 94704 I Main 5t0-839- 8200 5901 West Cenmry Boule azd, Sui[ e 7 0 I. os Angcles, CA 90045 Main 310- 348- 2901 4 I.imited i.:ia6ility Ca t
pany
203
DocuSign Env lope ID: 69BD3? 37- CC,.58- 4752- 36- 4.4989 A1D Q3 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 3 of 7 ends

Exhibit A
Transactional Scope of Services

1. Provide preliminary and updated refunding analyses. Monitor the estimated savings level and advise City to the extent of significant adverse changes relative to prior estimates and/or savings thresholtls. Provide City with costs of issuance estimates and identify any noncontingent costs.

2. Provide a preliminary evaluation of selling the refunding obligations through a private placement/ direct purchase, which may include an informal solicitation of indications of interest in advance of a request for proposal process.

3. Assist the City in assembling the remaining components of the financing team, as necessary or requestetl ( i. e., verification agent; underwriter, in the event of a public offering). It is contemplated that Jones Hall wil serve as bond counsel and disclosure counsel ( as applicable) and NBS Government Services, the City's current assessment and tax administrator, will serve as reassessment engineer and will provide the property data antl tables with respect to the property in the community facilities district and reassessment district. It is initially contemplated that a special tax consultant may not be needed but if there is a need for such services, it is contemplated that Goodwin Consulting Group would serve in that role.

4. Prepare a distribution list and a timetable for the proposed financing in consultation with other financing team members; update both as needed.

5. Recommend or confirm the method of sale between a public offering or private placement/ direct purchase.

6. If a private placement/direct purchase approach is pursued, preparation of a request for proposals and circulate to potential financing providers. Assist the City in evaluating the cost and other terms of each proposal and advise the City as to whether to continue to pursue a private placement/direct purchase with one provider or to pursue a public offering. For a direct purchase, it is not contemplated that the loan will meet certain regulatory requirements such that a placement agent will not be necessary.

7. Work with bond counsel and City staff in developing the initial form of documents for the refunding obligations.

8. Attend meetings/ conference calls as requested by the City to discuss and formulate plans for the proposed financing and/ or for document review. This may include meetings of the City Council where approval of the financing is considered,

9. Prepare various debt service and structuring analysis for the Mossdale CFD/AD Refinancing, and savings structures, and/ or review debt service schedules and/ or analyses prepared by the underwriter as applicable.
2054 Unicersity lvenue, Swte 300 I I3erkeley, CA 94704 ' biain 510- 839- 8200 5901 West Cenmry Boulecazd, Suite 750 I Los Angeles, CA 90045 I hSain 310- 348- 2901 A l.imited Liabilih Cumpnnp
204
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69BD3737- CC58- 4752- 9338- 4A0898A1D603 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 4 of 7 ends

10. Advise and provide recommendations on any remaining structural features of the transaction, such as financial covenants, cali features, etc.

11. Assist with staff reports and policy issues, including providing a draft debt policy ( required by SB 1029).

12. Develop good faith estimates as required by State law.

13. Assist with the review and negotiation as needed of all bond and disclosure documents, as applicable, including but not limited to the Preliminary and Final Officiai Statement, Private Placement Memorandum, direct purchase documents, City Councii Resolution, Trust Indenture, Lease Agreements, Bond Purchase Agreement, Continuing Disclosure Agreement, O cial Notice of Sale, etc. It is contemplated that the relevant bond antl disclosure documents will be prepared by City's bond and disclosure counsel.

14. For a public offering ( competitive or negotiated sale), ativise whether to pursue a credit rating and, if so, prepare the necessary materials and apply for ratings from the rating agencies, and manage the City' s oral presentation or telephone conference interviews with the rating analysts. For a private placemenUdirect purchase coordinate a credit review/ due diligence call or meeting between the City and the prospective purchaser

15. If applicable, for a rated public offering, conduct analyses to determine economics of bond insurance and reserve surety assist City with solicitation of bond insurance bid( s), if deemed beneficial. I

16. Direct the advertisement and outreach for bids for sale of the bonds for a competitive sale, if applicable.

17. Review tax-exempt market supply and demand variables in connection with the bonds, make recommendations regarding the timing of the pricing ( public offering).

18. Conduct pricing oversight and market comparables analysis for negotiated sale. Assist the City in pricing negotiations ( negotiated sale or direct purchase/ private placement). Conduct the bid opening and verify the lowest bitlder ( i. e., lowest true interest cost) in the case of competitive sale.

19. If the refunding escrow is net funded, assist in the purchase of escrow securities, such as U. S.

Treasury Securities — State and Local Government series ( SLGS). If SLGS are not available due to debt ceiling issues, the seroices of a bidding agent may be necessary.

20. Assist in coortlinating the closing of the debt issue to the extent not coordinated by bond counsel or underwriter, such as the transfer of funds from the underwriter or purchaser.

21. Other municipal advisory services that may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the contemplatetl transaction, including responding to routine post- closing inquiries or requests by the City.
2054 University venue, Suite 300 I Berkeley,(: A 94704 iblain 510- 839- 8200 590t West Cenmry Boulecazd, Suite 750 ( I,os Angeles, CA 90045 Main 310- 34R- 2901 A I.imiYed I.eabiliry Company
205
DocuSign Envelope ID: 696D3737- CC5B- 4752- 933B- 4A0898A1D603 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 5 of 7 ends

Exhibit B
Fee Schedule
For services rendered in connection with Exhibit A of this document, KNN will be compensated based upon the following schedule:

Please note that all fees below are contingent upon the successful pricing and closing of the transaction See Exhibit C for certain disclosures regarding potenfial conflicts of interest associated with contingent fees):

1. If the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing is sold via a tlirect purchase/ private placement, then KNN' s transaction fee will be$ 61, 500.
2, If the Mossdale CFD/AD Refinancing is sold via a public offering (competitive or negotiated) withouf a credit rating or bond insurance, then KNN' s transaction fee will be$ 76, 500.

3. If the Mossdale CFD/ AD Refinancing is sold via a public offering ( competitive or negotiated) with a credit rating and/ or bond insurance, then KNN' s transaction fee will be$ 86, 500.

Expenses: The compensation figures above are inclusive of KNN out-of-pocket expenses for any overnight delivery, copying, conference calls and market data charge. The following expenses, as applicable, will be paid by the City: the expense of printing antl distributing the official statement, any travel expenses of City officials, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, fees of the reassessment engineer, assessmenUtax administrator and special tax consultant, if any, rating agency fees, trustee or paying agent fees, any insurance fees, verification/ bidding agent fees, any cost of obtaining statistical data for the official statement or lender RFP, costs required to be paid by the City pursuant to an accepted lender proposal and any other costs of issuance.
2054 Unicersity Avenue, Suite 300 I Berkeley, C 94704 Iofain 510- 839- 8200 5901 West Century Boulecard, Suite 750 I
l.os:\ ngeles, CA 90045 btain 310- 348- 2) Ol
A l.imited Liabilih Cumpanv
206
DocuSign Envelope ID: o9BD3737-CC56-4752- 9336-4A089EA1D603 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 6 of 7 ends

Exhibit C
Disclosures Pursuant to MSRB Rules G-42 and G- 10
Pursuant to Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (" MSRB") Rule G- 42, on Duties on Non- Solicitor Municipal Advisors, Municipal Advisors are required to make certain written disclosures to clients which include, amongst other things, Conflicts of Interest antl any Legal or Disciplinary Events of KNN Public Finance, LLC(" KNN Public Finance") and its associated persons.

Conflicts of Interest
Other Municipal Advisor Relationships. KNN serves a wide variety of other clients that may from time to time have interests that could have a direct or intlirect impact on the interests of another KNN client. For example, KNN serves as municipal advisor to other municipal advisory clients such as San Joaquin County and, in such cases, owes a regulatory duty to such other clients just as it will to your entity, if hired. These other clients may, from time to time and depending on the specific circumstances, have competing interests. In acting in the interests of its various clients, KNN could potentially face a conflict of interest arising from these competing client interests. KNN fulfills its regulatory duty and mitigates such conflicts through dealing honestly and with the utmost good faith with its clients.

Compensation. KNN Public Finance represents that in connection with the issuance of municipal securities, KNN Public Finance may receive compensation from an Issuer or Obligated Person for services rendered, which compensation is contingent upon the successful closing of a transaction and/ or is basetl on the size of a transaction. Consistent with the requirements of MSRB Rule G- 42, KNN Public Finance hereby discloses that such contingent and/ or transactional compensation may present a potential conflict of interest regarding KNN Public Finance' s ability to provide unbiased advice to enter into such transaction.

This conflict of interest will not impair KNN Public Finance' s ability to render unbiased antl competent advice or to fulfill its fiduciary duty to the Issuer.

If KNN Public Finance becomes aware of any additional potential or actual conflict of interest after this disclosure, KNN Public Finance will disclose the detailetl information in writing to the Issuer in a timely manner.

Legal or Disciplinary Events
KNN Public Finance, LLC, has never been subject to any legal, disciplinary or regulatory actions nor was it ever subject to any legal, disciplinary or regulatory actions previously, when it was a division of Zions First National Bank or Zions Public Finance, Inc,
A regulatory action disclosure has been made on Form MA- I for one of KNN' s municipal advisory personnel relating to a 1998 U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (" SEC") order that was filed while the municipal advisor was employed with a prior firm, ( not KNN Public Finance). The details of which are available in Item 9; C( 1), C( 2), C( 4), C( 5) and the corresponding regulatory action DRP section on Form MA antl Item 6C; ( 1), ( 2), ( 4), ( 5) and the corresponding regulatory action DRP section on Form MA- I.

Issuers may electronically access KNN Public Finance' s most recent Form MA and each most recent Form MA- I filed with the Commission at the following website:
www. sec. qovledqarfsearchedqar/ companysearch html.
2054 Uni- ersity Acenue, Suite 300 I Berkeley, CA 94704 I fain 510- 839- 8200 5901 West Century Boulecazd, Suite 7 0
I Los Angeles, CA 9004 bfain 310-348-2901
4 I..imited Liability Cotnpany
207
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69BD3737-CC5B-4752- 933B-4A0898AiD803 Municipal Advisory Agreement

Page 7 of 7 ends

The SEC permits certain items of information required on Form MA and Form MA-I to be provided by reference to such required information already filed on a regulatory system ( e. g., FINRA CRD). The above
noted regulatory action has been referenced on both Form MA and MA-I due to the information already filed on FINRA' s CRD system and is publicly accessible through BrokerCheck at http:// brakercheck. finra. orq. For purposes of accessing such BrokerCheck information, the Municipal Advisor' s CRD number is 4457537.

There has been no change to any legal or disciplinary event that has been disclosed on KNN Public Finance's original SEC registration Form MA filetl on February 8, 2016 or Form MA-I' s filed on January 22, 2016.

Additional Disclosures - MSRB Rule G- 10
Pursuant to Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rule G- 10, on Investor and Municipal Advisory Client Education and Protection, Municipal Advisors are required to provide certain written information to their municipal entity and obligated person clients which inciude the following:
a) KNN Public Finance, LLC is currently registered as a Municipal Advisor with the U. S.

Securities and Exchange Commission and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. b) Within the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (" MSRB") website at www.msrb. org, the City of Lathrop may obtain the Municipal Advisory client brochure that is posted on the MSRB website. The brochure tlescribes the protections that may be provided by the MSRB Rules along with how to file a complaint with financial regulatory authorities. 2054 Univecsit} Aaenue, Suite 300 I Berkeley, CA 94704 ( Main 510- 839- 8200 5901 West Cenmry Boulecazd, Suite 750 Los Angeles, CA 90045 I NSain 310- 348- 2901 A J.. imited I:ialiilih C impxn,y
208
ITEM 4. 12

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: VALIDATION OF THE 2022 FINDING OF

ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE MOSSDALE

TRACT AREA
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Validating the 2022 Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) Finding of
Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area
Formally referred as Reclamation District 17
Basin), Acting as the Land Use Agency
CEQA STATUS: The project is exempt according to the
California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA)
Article 18, § 15262 Feasibility and Planning
Studies"
SUMMARY:

Senate Bill 5 ( SB5), and related companion bills created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the California Central Valley.

Prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for non- residential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions ( building permits) for new residential buildings, land use agencies are required to make findings related to the provision of 200- Year or Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP). In order to comply with this requirement and remain consistent with Deparment of Water Resources ( DWR) Guidance regarding how cities can adhere to the requirement, the City needs to make findings of Adequate Progress toward the provision of Urban Level Flood Protection 200- year flood protection.

On June 20, 2016, June 5, 2017, July 9, 2018, July 8, 2019, July 13, 2020 and July 12, 2021, City Council approved an Adequate Progressing Finding Report ( APR) toward provision of 200- Year ULOP in Reclamation District 17 Basin ( hereinafter referred to as the Mossdale Tract Area). This allowed the City of Lathrop to continue to issue, within the Mossdale Tract Area, discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes for a limited period subject to ongoing validation of that finding. One of the ongoing requirements is to annually report to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system. AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to 2028.

Based on the approval by San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) of the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update ( Attachment B) for a 200- Year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Mossdale Tract Area by the Year 2028, staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution validating the 2022 Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) Finding of Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area. This would allow the City of Lathrop to continue to issue, within the Mossdale Tract, discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits building permits) for new residential.
209
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2022 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Water Resources developed certain guidance and ULOP criteria in response to requirements outlined in the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, enacted by SB5 in 2007 and amended by subsequent legislation ( 2007 California Flood Legislation). DWR developed the ULOP criteria to assist affected cities and counties within the Sacramento- San Joaquin Valley, in making the findings related to an ULOP before approving certain land use entitlements in accordance with the 2007 California Flood Legislation.

The existing Mossdale Tract Area levees currently do not meet the updated DWR Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) standards adopted by DWR in May 2012, and the existing levees are not currently certified to provide 200- year protection.

Accordingly, the land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area, in coordination with RD 17, have been jointly pursuing efforts to achieve ULOP by 2025. AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to 2028.

In June 2016, June 2017, July 2018, July 2019 and July 2021, Larsen Wurzul & Associates ( LWA) prepared the RD 17 Area: Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection" ( APR). The APR served as a strategic plan describing and outlining the steps that the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) and the land use agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area are taking to generate the local funding necessary to advance and ultimately implement 200- year levee improvements in accordance with the requirements of 2007 Senate Bill 5 ( SB5).

This 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update ( Attachment B), in combination with other documentation submitted by SJAFCA as the LFMA, is intended to continue to support the requirements of Government Code Section 65007 ( a)( 5) that " The local flood management agency shall annually report to the CVFPB on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system." As noted above, it is also intended that this report may be referenced by all of the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area ( specifically the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton, as well as San Joaquin County) in making new or validating findings related to approval of development projects that rely on the Adequate Progress Findings where such a finding is applicable.

The 2022 APR described several aspects including:

The requirements set forth by SB5 and ULOP;
The requirements of Land Use Agencies in making findings related to Adequate Progress toward ULOP, and, more specifically;
The approach the LFMA in the Mossdale Tract Area is taking with respect to compliance with the guidance provided by the California Department of Water Resource in support of the Land Use Agencies' maintenance of findings of Adequate Progress.
210
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2022 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
In addition, the 2007 California Flood Control Legislation required the LFMA to:

Report annually to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on the status of the progress toward completion of the flood protection system, and Validate that the adequate progress finding is still effective.

The 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update was prepared to satisfy the above requirements so that the City of Lathrop, as a Land Use Agency, may rely on the prior findings of Adequate Progress.

Based as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' s adopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. S) AFCA' s efforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. ( KSN) detailing the additional costs of complying with the adopted climate adaptation policy as well as the materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2022 Update to the 2016 Engineer' s Report and associated IPE review/ Engineer' s response.

A comprehensive update of SJAFCA' s Project was prepared in to 2021 to consolidate and present a single budget for to address ULDC deficiencies and address Climate Adaptation. The updated cost estimate in present day 2021 dollars, is approximately 230 million.

Previously, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, as well as Reclamation District 17, comprised the LFMA, and these agencies have been reporting the status of ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area to the CVFPB. With the modification of SJAFCA' s membership in 2018, SJAFCA has taken over the role of LFMA for the Mossdale Tract Area, and this report is now being submitted to support all land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Approval by SJAFCA of the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for a 200- Year ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area, and submission by SJAFCA of this report to the CVFPB ( Attachment C), allows the City of Lathrop, as a Land Use Agency, to rely on the prior findings of Adequate Progress. This will then allow the City of Lathrop to continue to issue, within the Mossdale Tract Area, discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes while the City continues to make progress toward establishing ULOP 200- year flood protection by the year 2028.
211
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2022 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
CEQA STATUS:

The project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 18, § 15262 Feasibility and Planning Studies".

FISCAL IMPACT:

Initially, all technical reports were been funded by the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca and our development community. Recently, these funds have been supplemented by advanced funds from Stockton, the County of San Joaquin, and the State of California via an Urban Flood Risk Reduction grant. The future cost will be provided by outside funding sources identified in the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.

ATTACH M ENTS:

A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lathrop, Acting as the Land Use Agency, Validating the 2022 Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) Finding of Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area
B. 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Protection Final Report, dated January 24, 2023
C. SJAFCA Letter dated, January 31, 2023 to CVFPB transmitting the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Protection 212
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 5
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2022 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
APPROVALS:
2 6fZo23
Brad T lor Date
City E ineer
2 ..

Cari James ' Date
Finance S vi ces Director
2 • te • Z o Z 3
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
oZ3
Salva r avarrete Date
City Attorney
Z• 9•Z3
Ste n J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
213
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP VALIDATING THE 2022 URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD PROTECTION ( ULOP)

FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE MOSSDALE TRACT AREA FORMALLY REFERRED AS RECLAMATION DISTRICT 17 BASIN), ACTING AS

THE LAND USE AGENCY
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 5 ( SB5), and related companion bills, created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the California Central Valley; and
WHEREAS, prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for non- residential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions building permits) for new residential buildings, land use agencies are required to make findings related to the provision of 200- year Urban Level of Flood Protection ULOP); and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2016, June 5, 2017, July 9, 2018, July 8, 2019, July 13, 2020, and July 12, 2021, the City Council approved an Adequate Progressing Finding Report ( APR) toward provision of 200- year ULOP in the Reclamation District 17 basin ( hereinafter referred to as the Mossdale Tract Area); and WHEREAS, this action allowed the City of Lathrop to continue to issue, within the Mossdale Tract Area, discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes for a period of 10 years' subject to ongoing validation of that finding; and WHEREAS, efFective ) anuary 1, 2018, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement JEPA) establishing San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) was amended to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca and remove San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; and
WHEREAS, with the recent modification of SJAFCA membership, SJAFCA has taken over the role of Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) for the Mossdale Tract Area and this report is now being submitted to support all land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area; and
WHEREAS, AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to 2028; and
WHEREAS, based on S] AFCA' s approval of the Mossdale Tract Program: 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Flood Protection dated January 24, 2023 ( included as Attachment B to the February 13, 2023 staff report) and its transmittal to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution validating prior findings of Adequate Progress made by the City on June 20, 2016; and
214
WHEREAS, based as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' s adopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. SJAFCA' s efforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. ( KSN) detailing the additional costs of complying with the adopted climate adaptation policy as well as the materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2021 Update to the 2016 Engineer' s Report and associated IPE review/ Engineer' s response; and
WHEREAS, a comprehensive update of Project was prepared in to 2021 to consolidate and present a single budget for to address ULDC deficiencies and address Climate Adaptation. The updated cost estimate in present day 2021 dollars, is approximately $ 230 million; and
WHEREAS, the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 18, § 15262 " Feasibility and Planning Studies".

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop, acting as the land use agency, hereby validates and reaffirms the June 20, 2016 Finding of Adequate Progress toward providing a 200- Year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Mossdale Tract Area by the year 2028, based upon the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update ( included as Attachment B to the February 13, 2023 staff report (" Adequate Progress Finding"); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the hereby referenced and incorporated substantial evidence in the record, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby validates and affirms that the Adequate Progress Finding adopted, pursuant to SB5 and its companion legislation, shall serve as the Adequate Progress Finding for the City of Lathrop' s approval of any and all discretionary permits and approvals issued pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law, the California Subdivision Map Act, and Development Agreement Law to any commercial and industrial uses, and any and all ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes for a period of 10 years' subject to ongoing validation of that finding, as applied to urban development in the Mossdale Tract Area which urban development is approved in accordance with local and State laws; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the hereby referenced and incorporated substantial evidence in the record, hereby and above referenced reports and all documents comprising the record of proceedings, affected land use decisions for development in Mossdale Tract Area are expected to have 200- year flood protection by 2028; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City finds is the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 18, § 15262 ' Feasibility and Planning Studies".
215
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of February 2023, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO ORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 216
lossdale Tract Prog
ram :
2022 Annua I
Adequate ProJress
Rep p ort U date

FOR URBAN LEVEL OF PROTECTION
P:: u E,'I {O:': T le Qrl JC: CUI I !'>, I' E,' C FIO? Q _ I''; I ,, t!!- ,. , JGn y 24 2023
www. c rsenwurze. com
217
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview& Context................................................................................................................................. 1 Land Use and LFMA Requirements for Maintaining Findings of Adequate Progress toward ULOP ................... 2 Mossdale Tract Area Approach to ULOP ............................................................................................................. 2 Adequate Progress toward ULOP.............................................................................................................. 6 Critical Features of the Flood Protection System are Under Construction and Each Critical Feature is Progressing........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary of Scope, Schedule & Cost................................................................................................................... 7 Schedule........................................................................................................................................................ 7 TotalProgram Costs...................................................................................................................................... 8 Applicable Geographic Area Reliant on Adequate Progress Report.......................................................... 10 Project Funding and Financing Approach................................................................................................ 12 Governance Approach to Funding& Implementation ..................................................................................... 13 Project Funding and Financing Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 RemainingProject Costs................................................................................................................................... 14 LSRPProject................................................................................................................................................ 14 Sources& Uses.................................................................................................................................................. 14 Detailed Cash Flow Analysis and Schedule of Expenses and Revenues ........................................................... 15 Government Code § 65007 a) 2) A) Compliance...................................................................................... 15 Evaluation of Identified Revenues.................................................................................................................... 24 New Special Assessment............................................................................................................................ 25 Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District................................................................................................ 25 Status and Schedule for Funding& Financing Implementation ....................................................................... 28

LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
218
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Program Cost Summary......................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2: RD 17 LSRP Remaining Capital Cost Estimate & Cost Share................................................................ 17 Table 3: ULDC Project Engineer' s Opinion of Probable Cost............................................................................ 18 Table 4: ULOP Adequate Progress Sources& Uses Statement( through 2026) ............................................... 19 Table 5: ULOP Levee Program Cash Flow and Financing Analysis.................................................................... 20 Table 6: Government Code 65007 ( a) Analysis................................................................................................. 22 Table 7: Expenditure Schedule for the Phase 4 Project.................................................................................... 23

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: 200- Year Floodplain Depths for Areas Protected by Levees ............................................................. 11 Figure 2: Combined Assessment Revenue& EIFD Tax Increment Financing Approach................................... 27

APPENDICES
Appendix A: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 19- 06: Resolution to Adopt Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA in Light of Climate Change January 29, 2021, Technical Memorandum Prepared by Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. re:

San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Adjustments for Climate Change— Consolidated Cost Estimate
Appendix B: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 22- 07: Resolution Directing Staff to Work with the Member Land Use Agencies to Finalize the Mossdale Tract Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee Update and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute an Amended Collection Agreement ( excluding the final Nexus Study Update) 1 Amended Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Protection Development Impact Fee( Partial ExecutionJ 1 A full copy of the referenced Final Nexus Study can be found here:
https:// stockton. gran icus. com/ MetaViewer. p h p? view_ i d= 70& cl i p_ id= 7899& meta_ id= 698228 L

IARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.

II 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123.docx
219
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Development Impact Fee Program Supporting Tables
Appendix C: RD 17 LSRP Project Supporting Tables
Appendix D: Overlay Assessment District Revenue Analysis Supporting Tables Appendix E: Executed Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Development of Additional Funding Sources for the Mossdale Tract Area as Between the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton
Appendix F: Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District — Infrastructure Financing Plan Final Report dated June 2, 20222
Support Financing Plan Tables
Z A full copy of the referenced IFP Final Report can be found here:
https:// www. sjafca. org/ home/ sh owpubl isheddocu ment/ 1275/ 637902252871700000 L

I IARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.

II I
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
220
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
APR Adequate Progress Repot
2016 APR RD 17: Area Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection ( June 2016) Area Mossdale Tract Area
2020 APR Update Mossdale Tract Area 2020 Annual Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection ( May 30, 2017 revised June 13, 2017) CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
Climate Adaptation Policy SJAFCA adopted Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SAJFCA in Light of Climate Change CVFPB Central Valley Flood Protection Board
DIF Development Impact Fee
DWR California Department of Water Resource
EIFD Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
EIP Early Implementation Program
Engineer' s Report PBI' s March 22, 2016 ULDC Evaluation of the RD 17 Levee Project Levee Improvements to achieve ULDC 200- year requirements IPE Independent Panel of Experts
JEPA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
JPA Joint Powers Authority
KSN Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck Inc.

Land Use Agencies San Joaquin County and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton LFMA Local Flood Management Agency( previously RD 17,
Lathrop, and Manteca, now SJAFCA)
LSRP Levee Seepage Repair Project
LWA Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc.

Mossdale Tract Area The area serviced by Reclamation District No. 17 0& M Operations and maintenance
OAD Special Benefit Overlay Assessment District

L IARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.

IV 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
221
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
PBI Peterson Brustad, Inc.

RD 17 Reclamation District 17
RFP Request for Proposal
S65 Senate Bill 5 ( 2007)
SJAFCA San Joaquin Flood Control Agency
SJCFCWCD San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District IFP/ the Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan
UFRR Urban Flood Risk Reduction
ULDC Urban Levee Design Criteria
ULOP Urban Level of Flood Protection
USACE U. S. Army Corps of Engineers

L ARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.

V
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
222
San ) oaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Overview & Context
Larsen Wurzel& Associates, Inc. ( LWA) has been engaged by the San Joaquin Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA), the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) for the Mossdale Tract Area ( the Area), to prepare the Annual Adequate Progress Report Update ( Annual APR Update) toward the achievement of an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) within the Mossdale Tract Area. In 2016 and 2017, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, as well as Reclamation District 17 ( RD 17) comprised the LFMA and these agencies reported the status of Adequate Progress for the Mossdale Tract Area ( Area) to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB).

In January 2018, SJAFCA took over the role of LFMA for the Area and assumed responsibility for Annual Reporting pursuant to Government Code§ 65007( a)( 5). This Annual APR Update is being submitted by SJAFCA to support all land use agencies within the Area. This is the seventh Annual Report on Adequate Progress for the Mossdale Tract Area; the fifth prepared by SJAFCA.

As noted in the 2018 Annual APR Update, prior to January 2018, SJAFCA' s membership consisted of the City of Stockton, San Joaquin County, and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SJCFCWCD). Effective January 1, 2018, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement ( JEPA) establishing SJAFCA was amended to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca. This action was taken by all members of the new SJAFCA organization as part of the plan ( described further within this report3) to achieve ULOP. Herein, San Joaquin County and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton are jointly referred to as the Land Use Agencies.

In June 2016, lWA prepared the " RD 17 Area: Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection" 2016 APR). The 2016 APR served as a strategic plan describing and outlining the steps that the LFMA and the Land Use Agencies in the RD 17 basin ( hereinafter referred to as the Mossdale Tract Area) are taking to generate the local funding necessary to advance and ultimately implement 200- year levee improvements in accordance with the requirements of Senate Bill 5 ( 2007) ( S65). The 2016 APR described several aspects including:

The requirements set forth by SBS and ULOP;
The requirements of the Land Use Agencies in making findings related to Adequate Progress toward ULOP, and, more specifically;
The approach the LFMAs in the Mossdale Tract Area were taking with respect to compliance with the guidance provided bythe California Department of Water Resource( DWR) in support ofthe Land Use Agencies' maintenance of findings of Adequate Progress. 3 Reference the Governance Approach to Funding& Implementation section( page 12) of this report.

LWALARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
1 1501014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
223
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Land Use and LFMA Requirements for Maintaining Findings of Adequate Progress toward ULOP
Adequate Progress has been defined by the 2007 California Flood Legislation ( see Government Code 65007( a)) as:

The development of the scope, schedule, and cost to complete flood protection facilities; Documentation that revenues have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities;
Evidence that critical features ofthe flood protection facilities are under construction and progressing; The city or county has not been responsible for a significant delay in the completion of the system; and
The LFMA has provided DWR and the CVFPB information to determine substantial completion of the required flood protection.

Regarding the last bullet, the LFMA must annually document:

That the total project scope, schedule, and cost of the completed flood protection system have been developed to meet the appropriate standard of protection; That 90% of the required revenue scheduled to be received by that year have been appropriated and are being expended;
Critical features of the flood protection system are under construction and each critical feature is progressing as indicated by the actual expenditures of the construction budget; and, The city or county has not been responsible for a significant delay in the completion of the system.

In addition, the 2007 California Flood Control Legislation requires the LFMA to report annually to the CVFPB on the status of progress toward completion of the flood protection system.

This 2022 Annual Adepuate Proqress Report Update is intended to satisfy the annual reporting requirements of the LFMA for reference by the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area in their ULOP findings.

Mossdale Tract Area Approach to ULOP
The 2016 APR was prepared by the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca and RD 17 to provide information for the Cities and County located within the Mossdale Tract Area, for their reference in support of their respective ULOP findings for land use decisions within the Mossdale Tract Area. The following describes the evidentiary conclusions from the 2016 APR, based on DWR' s ULOP criteria ( collectively the ULOP EVD- 34):

A report prepared by the LFMA demonstrating Adequate Progress as defined in California Government Code Section 65007( a).
o The 2016 APR, in combination with other documentation prepared by the Land Use Agencies demonstrated adequate progress.

Reference page 2- 10 within the ULOP Criteria, November 2013.

L LARSEN WURZEI
Associates, Inc.
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
224
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
A report prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer registered in California to document the data and analyses for demonstrating the property, development project, or subdivision will have ULOP at the time when the flood protection system is completed.
o The LFMA requested that a team of Professiona/ Engineers led by Peterson Brustad, Inc. ( P81J in coordination with their subconsultants, Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck Inc. ( KSN) and ENGEO prepare the required report. Their report, dated March 22, 2016, compiled under a Cover Memorandum titled " Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDCJ Evaluation of the RD17 Levee" met the requirement at that time.

A report by an Independent Panel of Experts ( IPE) on the review of the report prepared by the Professional Civil Engineer.
o An IPE consisting of Robert Pyke, Edwin Hultgren, and Thomas Plummer was engaged to review the Engineer' s Report. The panel' s report dated May 24, 2016, titled " Independent Review of Urban Levee Design Criteria Evaluation, March 2016" fulfilled this requirement.

A response by the Professional Civil Engineer to the comments from the IPE. o Pel, author of the documents reviewed by the IPE, responded in a letter addressed to Mr. Glenn Gebhardt with the City of Lathrop and Mr. Kevin lorgensen with the City of Manteca, dated June 3, 2016. Mr. Dave Peterson, P. E. of P81 prepared the response. This letter fulfilled this requirement.

An annual report prepared by the LFMA, submitted to the CVFPB documenting the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system.
o The 2016 APR, in combination with other documentation prepared by the acting LFMA, supported the evidentiary requirements of Adequate Progress. The 2016 APR addressed how the flood protection system that will provide ULOP will be funded and financed. The 2016 APR described the proposed funding mechanisms, the approach and schedule for their implementation, and the projected revenues identified to support implemenration of the flood protection system.

The CVFPB, on October 25, 2016, acknowledged receipt of the evidentiary documentation including the 2016 APR and indicated that the" submittal sufficiently complies with the statutory requirements of California Government Code Section 65007( a)". The CVFPB indicated that their compliance letter was valid through September 30, 2017 and that future year' s evaluations would be based upon review of annually submitted documents.

On August 10, 2017, the City of Lathrop, acting as the LFMA and on behalf of the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, transmitted the first Annual APR Update, the 2017 Adepuate Proqress Report Update, dated June 13, 2017. In response to the submission of that report, CVFPB staff requested that the City of Lathrop prepare an Adequate Progress Submittal Form which was completed and submitted to CVFPB staff on Thursday November 2, 2017.

L A `ARSEN WURZEI
8 Associates, Inc.
3 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
225
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Subsequent Annual reports have been submitted by SJAFCA, acting as the LFMA and on behalf of the Mossdale Tract Area, to the CVFPB as follows:

On June 28, 2018, SJAFCA transmitted the 2018 Annual Adequate Propress Report Update.

On June 28, 2019, SJAFCA transmitted the 2019 Annual Adepuate Propress Report Update.

On June 30, 2020, SJAFCA transmitted the 2020Annual Adequate Proqress Report Update.

On June 29, 2021, SJAFCA transmitted the 2021 Annual Adequate Proqress Report Update To address the uncertain nature of climate change and the resulting impacts to hydraulics and hydrology, in February 2019 SJAFCA adopted a Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SAJFCA in Light of Climate Change( Climate Adaptation Policy, SJAFCA Resolution No. 19- 06, included as Appendix A).

This policy identifies seven specific elements that are to be incorporated into both the design and implementation of the Mossdale Tract 200-year improvements to address climate change uncertainties.

Further, SJAFCA engaged a task order with PBI to update the scope and cost of the 200- year improvements to address the adopted Climate Adaptation Policy. This effort resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. ( KSN) detailing the costs of complying with the policy( also included in Appendix A).

The 2020 Annual Report Update and subsequent reports have reflected the costs of compliance with the adopted Climate Adaptation Policy as part of the financing plans presented within them. Further, an evaluation and analysis of the proposed Climate Adaptation Policy improvements determining that the improvements meet the appropriate standard of protection has been completed consistent with the evidentiary requirements of DWR' s ULOP criteria. The 2021 Annual Report Update and subsequent reports include reference to the additional evidentiary materials. Those materials include:

A report prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer registered in California to document the data and analyses for demonstrating the property, development project, or subdivision will have ULOP at the time when the flood protection system is completed.
o A team of Professional Engineers led by Peterson Brustad, Inc. ( PBIJ in coordination with their subconsultants, Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck Inc. ( KSNJ and ENGEO prepare a report dated June 18, 2021, compiled under a Cover Memorandum tit/ed " 2021 Climate Change Update to the Mossdale Engineer' s Report." The materials included within the report were presented to the IPE in Apri12021 for their review and comment.

A report by an Independent Panel of Experts ( IPE) on the review of the report prepared by the Professional Civil Engineer.
o An IPE consisting of Robert Pyke, Robert Lokteff, and Thomas Plummer was engaged to review the 2021 Climate Change Update to the Mossdale Engineer' s Report. In response, the IPE prepared a report dated June 1, 2021, titled" Independent Panel of Experts for RD 17 200- Year Level of Protection Project Climate Change Update."

L LARSEN WURZEL
ASSOCIOt@S, f1C.
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx 4
226
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
A response by the Professional Civil Engineer to the comments from the IPE. o Pel, author of the documents reviewed by the IPE, responded in a letter addressed to Mr. Chris Elias, dated June 18, 2021. Mr. Michael Rossiter, P. E. of P81 prepared the response. This letter fulfilled the response requirement.

An annual report prepared by the LFMA, submitted to the CVFPB documenting the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system.
o This 2022 APR, in combination with the documentation prepared by the LFMA, supports the evidentiary requirements of Adequate Progress. This 2022 APR addresses how the flood protection system, as described within the 2016 and 2021 Climate Change Update Engineer' s reports, will provide ULOP will be funded and financed. This 2022 APR describes the proposed funding mechanisms, the approach and schedule for their implementation, and the projected revenues identified to support implementation of the flood protection system. Further, this 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update is intended to continue to address the requirements of Government Code Section 65007( aJ( 5J. " The localflood management agency shall annually report to the CVFPB on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system."
Finally, it is intended that this report, in combination with any other required documentation pursuant to S65 and DWR' s associated ULOP Guidance, may be referenced by the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area ( specifically the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton, as well as San Joaquin County) in making new or validating findings related to approval of development projects that rely on the Adequate Progress Findings where such a finding is applicable.

L LARSEN WURZEL
c ASSOCIOt@S, ( t1C.
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx 5
227
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Adequate Progress toward ULOP
The existing RD 17 levees protecting the Mossdale Tract Area do not meet the updated DWR ULDC standards adopted in May 2012, and the existing levees are not currently certified to provide 200- year protection.

Accordingly, SJAFCA and RD 17 are pursuing efforts to achieve ULOP by the required deadline, 2028. 5 The LFMA' s plan for flood protection through the year 2028 consists of two components: ( 1) RD 17' s ongoing Phase 3 Levee Seepage Repair Project ( LSRP) and ( 2) SJAFCA Levee Improvements to achieve ULDC 200-year requirements ( the Project).

The Project, as described previously in the 2016 APR, consisted of a Fix- In- Place Levee Improvement Project and an extension of the existing dryland levee in Manteca. A review of the ( i) Project scope, ( ii) Project schedule, and ( iii) the cost of the completed flood protection system, all as proposed in 2016, demonstrates that they were developed to meet the appropriate standard of protection based on information known at that time. As noted above, as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' s adopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR underthe Urban Flood Risk Reduction( UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. SJAFCA' s efforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. ( KSN) detailing the additional costs of complying with the adopted climate adaptation policy as well as the materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2021 Update to the 2016 Engineer' s Report and associated IPE review/ Engineer' s response.

Critical Features of the Flood Protection System are Under Construction and Each Critical Feature is Progressing
RD 17, with funding from the issuances of multiple series of bonds secured by assessment revenues and a funding agreement with DWR, has constructed nearly all of the Phase 3 LSRP improvements. The remaining component of the Phase 3 LSRP improvements include:

1. A 400' long SB/ SCB jet- grout cutoff wall under the River Islands Parkway bridge ( Element VI- a. 1); and,

2. A 2300' long SB cutoff wall (Element VI- bc).

Based on information obtained from RD 17 and estimates made by LWA given information provided, a cumulative total of approximately $ 67. 67 million of LSRP improvements ( an estimated additional $ 29. 99 million since June 2021) have been completed including the construction of seepage berms during and after the storms of February 2017. In addition, the RD 17 Levee Area Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority( JPA) set up by agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area, issued $ 20. 85 million of bonds in 2017 to both refinance a prior financing from 2009 and to generate additional net new proceeds for flood control 5 AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to 2028.

L( LARSEN WURZEI
Associates, Inc.
1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
228
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
improvements of$ 6. 531 million. These funds, along with grant funding from DWR, have been utilized by RD 17 to continue to advance the LSRP over the last 48 months.

The remaining construction work on the LSRP will continue to progress through 2023. This work will include the final remaining cutoff walls. It expected that the LSRP will be fully completed in 2023.

In lune 2016, the City of Lathrop secured 50% funding for$ 10 million of work ( total of $ 5. 0 million of grant funding) from DWR under the UFRR Program and executed a funding agreement with DWR to fund a feasibility analysis of a focused array of alternatives which address State estimates of climate change through 2040. In January of 2019, the grant funding agreement transitioned to SJAFCA. The scope of the feasibility analysis cost approximately $ 1, 170, 000. The remaining funds from DWR are now being used to advance environmental review ( California Environmental Quality Act [ CEQA] Analysis) and preliminary design of the initial phase of the preferred alternative. In XX, 2022, SJAFCA executed a Feasibility Study Cost Share Agreement( FCSA) with the USACE to evaluate the Federal Interest in an array of alternatives to provide enhanced flood protection to the Lathrop and Manteca Area. While Federal interest in the Mossdale Program is being evaluated, SJAFCA continues to advance design and permitting of certain common features of the UFRR feasibility study preferred alternatives that overlap in part with features ofthe ULOP Project. Through December 2022, SJAFCA has expended approximately$ 3. 0 million advancing the CEQA Analysis and preliminary design efforts.

Summary of Scope, Schedule & Cost
The 2016 Engineer' s Report and 2021 Update identify two projects. These projects are listed below and, when fully implemented, will meet the objective of 200- year ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area. These projects include:

1. RD 17 LSRP is being implemented in three phases:
a. Phase 1( Completed 2008- 09)
b. Phase 2 ( Completed 2009- 11)
c. Phase 3 ( Construction Commenced 2016- Completion scheduled in 2023)

2. SJAFCA Project6 is being pursued as Phase 4 and includes the following outlined steps:
a. ULDC engineering analysis and identification of deficiencies ( completed March 22, 2016) b. Additional Climate Change related analyses and update to the ULDC engineering analysis to consider SJAFCA' s Adopted Climate Adaptation Policy( completed June 18, 2022) c. Design and environmental evaluation of levee improvements to cure ULDC deficiencies Commenced July 2022, Administrative Draft EIR to be complete in January 2023) d. Implement levee improvements to cure ULDC deficiencies.

Schedule
On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed into law AB 838 which modified the year in which ULOP must in place for the Mossdale Tract. This law extended the deadline from 2025 to 2028. The following schedule of 6 Throughout this report the Phase 4 Project was formerly known as the" Fix- In- Place" Project with the inclusion the extension of the dryland levee in Manteca.

IIARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
7 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
229
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
milestones provides the LFMA' s updated current plan to implement the levee improvements by 2028. In addition, the Project Funding and Financing Approach outlines key milestones for implementation of the various funding mechanisms identified to support the revenue and financing requirements for the Project implementation.

Activity Completion
Phase 3: RD 17 LSRP 12/ 31/ 2023
Phase 4: SJAFCA Proiect
Environmental Documentation 6/ 30/ 2023
Right of Way Acquisition' 12/ 31/ 2024
Engineering Design8 12/ 31/ 2026
Construction 10/ 31/ 2028
Permitting& Compliance9 12/ 31/ 2028
Total Program Costs
Since the 2016 APR, an updated cost estimate consolidating all component of the project into a single estimate has been prepared. Table 1 summarizes the total costs for the LSRP and SJAFCA Projects. The total estimated design, permitting, and construction project costs of the LSRP in actual dollars in actual and expected dollars to complete construction is $ 73. 0 million. A comprehensive update of SJAFCA' s Project was prepared in to 2021 to consolidate and present a single budget for to address ULDC deficiencies and address Climate Adaptation. The updated cost estimate in present day 2022 dollars, is approximately$ 230. 01 million. lo Completion is reflective of possession of the necessary rights to complete the improvements, not necessarily compensation. 8 It is expected that the project would be phased and the first package of engineering plans and specific would be completed in time to commence construction in 2022.
9 Reflects required permitting and ongoing mitigation and monitoring requirements. lo Reference Appendix A- January 29, 2021 Technical Memorandum prepared by Kjeldsen Sinnock Neudeck, Inc. re: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Climate Change Adjustment: Consolidate Cost Estimate.

IIARSEN WURZEL
18 Associates, Inc.
8 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
230
Table 1
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Program Cost Summary
Actual Projected
Updated Project
Project Phase Costs to Complete
Costs Including
2021$)
limate Adaptation
2021$)
LSRP Phase 1 2, 665, 761
LSRP Phase 2( includingParks) 12, 951, 358
LSRP Phase 3 57, 371, 374
SJAFCA Project 230, 009, 000
Total Cost 72, 988,492 230, 009, 000
Source: Peterson Brustad, Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck
Prepared by LWA
9 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Mode12023 0110.x1sx
231
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
Applicable Geographic Area Reliant on Adequate Progress Report As noted in the 2016 APR and in the Annual Updates, the Adequate Progress Report applies to development afforded ULOP within the Mossdale Tract Area once the Project is complete. Figure 1 shows the results of PBI' s hydraulics analysis included as part of the Engineer' s Report. 11 The overall area removed from the floodplain as a result of completion of the LSRP and SJAFCA Project is shown as the combined red and blue areas in Figure 1. More specifically, the area with greater than three-foot flood depths that would be subject to S65 development restrictions without the completion of the LSRP and SJAFCA Project is shown in red. 11 This figure has been updated to reflect updated hydraulics associated with climate change. Future versions of this annual report will reflect the increased area to the East as a result of climate change.

L ALARSEN WURZEI
8 Associotes, Inc.
10 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
232
i
ti
Flood Depth
Y '` ,=
r a.a '.,`
y ya ;
0- 3 ft
i
A
f /"#
Y`
Y Y '
FV i„
uF
A
Y„
g ::
r r r
X :,+,` f a '' 3 ft
rvb `` e y
t ,
1 r
i _ Limits of Floodplain Modeling
r .
x ; , City Spheres of Influence
r Stream Centerline
m
L' 6250' FCS ' - .,. ' , Levee Breach Location
a€'
RD 17 Levee
StockCon,' yz °
spnere ot i finence>' , ' ,^,
Other Levee/ Embankment
r /' j

4.+
x,,,
j v
ri, "`
j
p , '
4;
r/
f
F,
z ' r,:
r:°` ',/ r'' ,+, .: d
a, /
r'' f, y `> ,
N
r` f
J` -"`'""
w;
t"' .
r:
c,_ ' i! j;'
f . f• + .? i
1 q
4 tr
j
c?' r'",E " s" z. , W
l; i;/,"
f /f , l
y
f%;/,' Lathrop, " 4
r/ Sphere of, lnfluence
i,
I
y
i ,,
jf d, r, y"`f
R_ 70095_ SJR '`/ s
f ' '/ ,: v"
k jy —'_
I _'_
t f
w
l,
PS'"!
r! ff Y
s^^
v/
S` f
a,.

F
F 331 Y
U' r f t. . / f ' f
5 ,, F
j',.ay //;/
f', f // .; lf ' y.: '
h,' !/ i%'% /, I r f
f" ^'%, i%~ F`///! ,'
R 83009 SJR '; i/ j id' tr^i'^ I"'3 ';"/*. ,
e E"` j
a k' '
y f1E3.` '
v r,,
R 9115TSJR / y i , ' ' ,,
1 y ,
x . t
i
f
i / / / / s 3"
3' ' j
r f r,/` ir
f, ! xf f
f '`
a,
r` y% i.
r
p ;,, J', f
r , d r r`.% ' .. e r`{.'.,'Y
i f f i
f R easo sR i Manteca - 4 r
ri ``<, : 1.
j,
i, F; r" . S heretoflnfluence
i r 4
ifi '' , f,!," /, l,i"'
p
f- 3
y r,'.,
a? \" r%'" ' .` l`-' ,,.
u `, fi !, i'+-
y`/ . r,r' rk'' § i
I` Y
R 1 02173 SJR.
i r' j/ ./' r„
j
1a fi '. r , '° yd,
f}
p s ' .
9!`,
Y
y' .
f't.,....
f, / // , w„
Q
f ,
1 / ;/ // ji// l
y i ,
l
n y/,.
v - 5 i ,
r . : .
t
jr
z , R iaoss wHs -, RD 17 Dryland Levee
u
e
i A
R
J P;`""' c t"
1`' , x
t..
y , p
F
Y
F .
r'' k " ;'
TM: , . *
i q
y
S t . x..
3` a _ a„
c
r
a,
u ,_ i,
o i
RD 17 AREA LOCAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PETERSON BRUSTA. INC . Miles
FIGURE
F r .« .
1 inch= 1 mile 200- YEAR FLOODPLAIN DEPTHS FOR
FOKom. CA95630
5 Zfio PhFar. 91fi) fi08-] Z3] Mays, Zo s AREAS PROTECTED BY RD- 17 LEVEES 233
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
Project Funding and Financing Approach
In accordance with 565, the 2016 APR provides documentation that revenues have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities. The following discussion restates and, where applicable, updates the revenue sources identified for the projects.

RD 17 has been advancing the LSRP since 2008 with the formation of the RD 17 assessment and funding from the DWR' s Early Implementation Projects ( EIP) and Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) Programs. These revenues sources remain in place to fund the LSRP.

To fund the Phase 4 SJAFCA Project, the LFMA has identified the following local funding sources for the design, environmental review, permitting, and construction of ULOP improvements. In summary, the near- term existing and potential funding sources include:

Net revenues from the existing RD 17 Assessment
o It is expected that some net revenues ( after debt service, RD 17 operation and maintenance O& M] expenses and pay- as- you- go funding for the final construction of the LSRP) will be available to fund the SJAFCA Project.

A Regional SJAFCA 200- Year Development Impact Fee
o A Regional SJAFCA 200-Year Development Impact Fee( Regional DIF) paid by property owners developing within the 200- year floodplain was adopted by SJAFCA in November 2018.

Property already entitled and planned for development within the basin that benefits from the Project that has( or will in the future) advanced funds can apply that priorfunding as credit towards the Project' s fee obligation via a fee crediting arrangement. In March 2018, SJAFCA Adopted Resolution 19- 15 formalizing a crediting program ( Appendix B).

A new Special Benefit Assessment District
o A new special benefit Overlay Assessment District ( OAD) would be levied on properties parcels) directly receiving flood damage reduction benefit from the construction and long- term O& M of the Project. SJAFCA has qualified and entered into contracts with Willdan Financial Services ( Willdan) to prepare the requisite Assessment Engineer' s Report and administer the legislative processes required by Proposition 218 and the underlying statutory authority for the imposition of the assessment. To date, Willdan has prepared a draft preliminary rate analysis for review by the SJAFCA. The preliminary analysis has been utilized to estimate future Assessment District revenues. ( Appendix D) An Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
o An Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District ( EIFD) captures a portion of the growth in general property taxes and dedicate the revenue toward the construction of the Project. This revenue, in conjunction with the OAD revenues could be pledged to the repayment of bonds, L
tARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
12 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
234
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
the proceeds of which could fund construction of the Project. SJAFCA commenced the formation effort of the EIFD in May 2019 and completed the formation process in July 2022.

With EIFD' s formation prior to August 2022 it is available to generate in FY 2022/ 2023.

A new Advance Funding Agreement executed between the Cities of Stockton, Manteca and Lathrop and SJAFCA
o To ensure that SJAFCA has sufficient revenues available to construct the Project, the Cities of Stockton, Manteca and Lathrop plan to enter into an Advance Funding Agreement with SJAFCA whereby sufficient funding would be made available to supplement funding from the above three noted funding sources to the extent the Fee Program, EIFD or OAD were no sufficient to provide all of the needed funds. To demonstrate the intent to move forward with this plan and for the purpose of supporting adequate progress, the Cities and SJAFCA executed a Memorandum of Understanding ( Appendix E). The MOU allows SJAFCA, as the LFMA, to identify an additional source of revenue for the Project consistent with the critieria for demonstrating Adequate Progress.

In addition to the above sources, SJAFCA expects that State Grant revenues of approximately $ 3. 8 million would be available from an existing UFRR Agreement with SIAFCA to advance the preliminary design and environmental review of the Project. These revenues have been included within the financing plan in addition to those revenues identified above.

Governance Approach to Funding & Implementation
Prior to 2016, to facilitate the funding and implementation of the Project, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca commissioned a governance evaluation. The 2016 APR outlined the governance structure that existed at the time in the Mossdale Tract Area for implementing the LSRP and outlined the entities that would be needed to support the implementation of the Phase 4 Project. The governance evaluation was completed in late 2017 and ultimately resulted in the reorganization of SJAFCA. SJAFCA is now the LFMA and Funding Entity, for the Mossdale Tract Area. SJAFCA now fulfills several distinct governance structures that were previously identified and evaluated to support the implementation, funding, and financing of the Project.

L IARSEN WURZEL
Associates,( nc.
13 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
235
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Project Funding and Financing Plan
In accordance with Government Code § 65007( a), this portion of the 2022 Annual APR Update provides documentation that revenues have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities and further, that sufficient revenues to fund each year of the project schedule have been identified.

The 2016 APR presented a Funding and Financing Plan that has been refined and updated based on the actual progression of the Project' s implementation and additional information obtained subsequent to that report.

Further this section addresses the requirement to demonstrate that in any given year, and consistent with that schedule of identified revenues, at least 90 percent of the revenues scheduled to be received by that year have been appropriated and are currently being expended.

Remaining Project Costs
LSRP Project
This document has been updated since the preparation of the 2016 APR to reflect progress since May 2016 based on the remaining costs as of June 2022 for the RD 17 LRSP as summarized in Table 2 below. Table 2 shows the split of costs between the State and RD 17 and the percentage of remaining project costs based on the amount expended in the last 12 months. It is estimated that there are approximately $ 5. 31 million in remaining project costs related to the remaining two reaches of the LSRP.

Phase 4 Project Costs
Table 3 presents the Opinion of Probable Costs prepared by PBI and KSN for the Phase 4 Project as of January 2021 which are inclusive of the Climate Adaptation update. The cost estimates have been prepared as part of the coordinated effort to prepare the Climate Adaptation Update to the Engineer' s Report.

Sources & Uses
An updated financing plan prepared for the implementation of the remaining levee improvements is shown in Table 4. Table 4 presents and sources and uses statement based on an updated cash flow reflective of the progress of the work over the past year and projected completion of the Project in 2028. Additionally, Table 4 shows the identified revenues that provide the basis for the conceptual financing plan. The financing plan is governed by the following assumptions:

The RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment and the associated bond issuances in combination with committed State funding from DWR' s EIP/ UFRR program will continue to fund seepage remediation work until completion in 2023. This financing plan has been updated to reflect the change in the State cost sharing memorialized through a funding agreement amendment between DWR and RD 17. The State cost sharing split for the LSRP Project is now 60%/ 40% State versus Local Funding.

The Cities would continue to cash flow the design and implementation of the Phase 4 Project, including the contemplated financing plan and supporting funding mechanisms, on an as needed basis consistent with the newly executed MOU. The amount of cash flow funding provided would be net of any Regional DIF, EIFD, OAD and Bond Proceed revenues received. The total funding received to

LWAILARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
14 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
236
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
date from all funding sources, including previously advanced funds, is approximately$ 15 million. All contributions from development interests are creditable toward the Regional DIF based on the credit program adopted by the SJAFCA Board ( reference Appendix B).

Net revenues from RD 17' s implementation of the LSRP, including retention releases and net RD 17 Assessment revenues after debt service, would be available to help fund Phase 4 Project expenses.

SJAFCA establishes the following funding mechanisms:
o A Regional DIF program collecting revenues in 2018 and updated in 2022. 1z o A new OAD in place to collect revenues in FY 2024/ 2025. o A new EIFD covering the properties directly benefiting from the project. The EIFD would have a base of FY 2021/ 2022 and start receiving revenues in FY 2022/ 2023. o A bond authorization and issuance securitizing both new OAD and EIFD revenues would take place in FY 2024/ 25. The proceeds from the bond would be used to fund construction costs of the Phase 4 Project
Detailed Cash Flow Analysis and Schedule of Expenses and Revenues To support the Adequate Progress Findings, as described in the 2016 APR, the LFMA must document that 90% of the required revenue scheduled to be received have been appropriated and are being expended. Table 5 presents an updated detailed cash flow analysis showing how the planned expenditures are funded over time.

This schedule is intended to be used by the LFMA to report annually to the CVFPB on the progress of the flood protection system. Table 5 is supported by a series of tables ( reflected in various appendices) that provide details regarding the expenditure and revenues schedule for the LSRP and SJAFCA' s Phase 4 Project.

Government Code § 65007( a) ( 2) ( A) Compliance
It is important to note that because ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area is being implemented in multiple stages, by multiple agencies, the financing plan identified for ULOP takes into consideration multiple funding sources.

This approach was outlined in the 2016 APR and continues here. The following discussion breaks the funding sources apart by project and discusses compliance with Government Code § 65007( a).

Within the 2020 Annual APR Update, the analysis associated with Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A) was updated. As noted above, Table 5 presents the updated schedule of revenue and expense projections to demonstrate progress of the Project as it relates to the requirements of Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A).

Because of permitting and funding delays related to the LSRP project, the estimates, including the overall costs and timing of expenses, as well as the schedule of revenues, was updated relative to the 2019 Annual APR Update.

Consistent with Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A), all of the revenues for the LSRP have been identified.

These revenues included 1) State Funding from the EIP/ UFRR Program and 2) RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment Revenues and Bond Proceeds. Further, consistent with the revised schedule, 90% of the revenues that are schedule to be received by this year have either been appropriated by a granting agency( in this case lz This action has been completed.

LWALARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
15 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
237
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
the State) or have been set aside by RD 17 ( reference Table 6). State funding for the RD 17 Project was included within prior State Budget Appropriations and the entirety of RD 17' s grant agreement has been appropriated. As it relates to the local share of the funding, while RD 17 is not required to adopt an appropriated budget by law, 13 they have set aside the funds for the Project and entered into contracts and/ or are required by law based on the source of the revenues to expend those funds for the specific purpose of implementing the LSRP ( this is consistent with the intent of a budgetary appropriation). More specifically, those contracts include the EIP Funding Agreement that RD 17 has entered into with DWR as well as the Indenture of Trust Agreements between the District and its Bond Trustee. Finally, as a matter of law, RD 17' s Assessment Revenues must be utilized consistent with its Assessment Engineer' s Report and annual resolution approving the levy of the assessment.

Finally, the last requirement of Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A) is that the revenues scheduled to be received by that year are currently being expended. As noted previously, RD 17 has expended an additional approximately$ 29. 9 million on the LSRP since in 2021. RD 17 is currently working to construct the remaining improvement which are expected to completed in 2023 at a cost of approximately$ 5. 31 million.

For the Phase 4 Project, because all of the identified funding is derived from local sources, there are no requirements of appropriations from the Federal or State governments. Table 6 shows the cumulative scheduled revenues and the associated compliance check with Government Code§ 65007( a)( 2)( A).

Table 7 provides the assumed expenditure schedule for the Phase 4 Project. It is expected that these tables will continue to be refined over time as the planning and development of the Projects progresses. 13 Reference Reclamation District No. 17 Financial Statements and Independent Auditor' s Report, June 30, 2017 Note A— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ( Page 13)—" Budgetary accounting: The District does not adopt an appropriated budget and is not required to adopt such a budget by law. However, the District does adopt a non- appropriated budget annually, which is approved by the Board of Trustees."

L IARSEN WURZEI
Associates, Inc.
16 1501014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0109. docx
238
Table 2
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
RD 17 LSRP Remaining Capital Cost Estimate& Cost Share
Item Remaining Costs [ 1] Loca140%( 2J State 60%( 2]
LSRP - Project Remaining Costs
Phase 1 ROW Remaining Costs 0 0 0
Phase 2 ROW Remaining Costs 0 0 0
Phase 3 Remaining Costs 5, 310, 000 2, 124, 000 3, 186, 000 Total Remaining Cost 5, 310, 000 2, 124, 000 $ 3, 186, 000 Remaining Costs as of APR( June 2021J 35, 300, 000
Reduction in Remaining Costs[ 3] 29, 990, 000
of June 2021 Remaining Project Completed 85%
Source: Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck( Updated by LWA)
1] Estimated remaining Costs as of December 2022.
2) Amounts are approximate and net of retention withheld by the State on prior incurred Cost by RD 17.

Prepared by LWA 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Mode12023 OIIO.xlsx 239
Table 3
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
ULDC Project Engineer' s Opinion of Probable Cost
Base Project
Item Total Costs( 2021$)
Soft Costs
Admin/ Planning 9, 158, 000
Environmental/ Permitting 5, 724, 000
Surveying/ Engineering 13, 736, 000
Construction Management 13, 736, 000
M itigation 3, 435, 000
Subtotal: Soft Costs 45, 789, 000
Construction 114, 455, 000
Right- of-Way Acquisition ( existing deficiencies) 14, 284, 000 Right- of-Way Acquisition ( new construction improvements) 3, 206, 000 Subtotal: Right of Way 17, 490, 000
Dryland Levee Extension Alternative: 52, 275, 000
Total Cost 230, 009, 000
Source: Kjeldsen Sinnock& Neudeck Technical Memorandum dated January 29, 2021 Consolidated Cost Estimate of SIAFCA Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Climate Change Adjustment.

Prepared by LWA 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 OIIO.xlsx 240
Table 4
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
ULOP Adequate Progress Sources& Uses Statement( through 2026) Item Total[ 3] Notes
Project Uses
LSRP Expenditures
LSRP- Phase I 2, 665, 761
LSRP- Phase II( including Parks) 12, 951, 358
LSRP- Phase III[ 2] 57, 371, 374
Subtotal: LSRP Expenditures 72, 988, 492
ULOP Prosram Plannin¢& Implementation
Pre- Project Expenditures( PBI/ LWA/ ETC) 3, 229, 308
Funding Program Implementation Costs 1, 554, 259
Subtotal: ULOP Progrem Planning& Implementation 4,783, 568 SIAFCA Proiect Expenditures
Soft Costs 51, 747, 220
Construction Costs 132, 885, 132
Right- of- Way 20,693, 768
Dryland Levee Extension 60, 654, 014
Subtotal: SJAFCA Project Expenditures 265, 980, 134
Total Project Uses 343, 752, 194
Project Sources
State Fundingfor LSRP( EIP Program) 43, 793, 095 [ 2]
State UfRR Funding( Preliminary Design Only) 3, 833, 330 [ 3] Subtotol State Funding 47,626, 425
Local Funding Sources
LSRP Fundinq
LSRP- RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessments( Net Revenues) 34, 912, 134 [ 4j LSRP- RD 17 Mossdale Tract( Bond Revenues) 30, 413, 996 [ S] LSRP- RD 17 Mossdale Tract( Debt Service) 27, 645, 547) [ 6] SJAFCA Project Funding
Developer Advances/ City Funding 3, 542, 659 [ 7]
SJAFCA Overlay Assessment- ULDC 14,769, 589 [ 8]
Development Fee Program 53, 247, 549 [ 9]
Member Agency Advance Funding 91, 100, 000 [ 10]
EIFD Revenues 27, 246, 178 [ 11]
Future EIFD/ Assessment Overlay Financing( Bond Proceeds) 84, 935, 000 [ 12] Future EIFD/ Assessment Overlay Financing( Debt Service Carry) 14,438, 306) [ 13] Subtotal local Funding 298, 083, 252
Total Project Sources 345, 709, 677
Total Project Sources less Uses 1, 957, 483
Source: LWA
1] Total Amounts between 2010& 2026 induding escalation. 2] Assumed State Share of Funding for RD 17 LSRP
3] Balance of UFRR Study Funding Agreement for Pre Design and Environmental Review. 4] Assumed share of RD 17 Assessment Revenues that are used to fund Project Costs and Debt Service for the LSRP during the time frame of the Analysis 5] Bond Proceeds assumed to be availble to fund Project Costs as calculated per the Cash Flow Analysis( Table 5) 6] De6t service for RD 17 PFA Financing during period of analysis. 7] Punding advanced by Cities and Developers from 2010 to 2016 for ULDC Analysis& Implementation of the Funding Program. 8] New overlay assessment revenues during period of implementation. 9] Development Impacc fee revenues collected during period of implementation. 10] Agency Advanced Funding provided by Memher Agencies pursuant to a fuwre Funding Agreement consistent with approved MOU. ll] EIFD revenues mllected during period of implementation. 12] Assumed financing secured by Overlay Assessment and EIFD Revenues. 13] Debt service for for the Hybrid EIFD and Assessment Financing during period of analysis.

Prepared by LWA
9 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 0110. x1sx 241
s
s
e
S
R e.. m
m .
i i N
m r
m_
r
4 n w g. i
e
y
E
o - k
C rt
3 0 3
V;
Y
v E `
O`
E a°, E A
a i . 4 c ` Z ' W` - ` a E
c
M - 6 E>
M C E _ c q a m B
u E v . o — ? o c
6 G w , p `" ` L
d a E _ 3
az -- '
o '
m° E'
e^ a
3 3
a e u a Q E m
rf a " J
h
VJ VJ'^
n $ .

Q
o
a
u° Q
s6.
n co
s
n
sa oifrc
242
a
m
8o
E
E
3 E
w
n
E
ry
N
3 E
c
o
E t
ry
E
M N
a
E
R
N
v
n
z
3 F,"
ry
n E
o
ry E _ 3
i aY , S o
E
5;
E
a. E E
E E
E
N
8 m
q - -
E
E o Z —
o ;
ea
z Q
o Q — Y¢
a
n p E
3 "
E o°
4 5 5 s` g° -- En ; v
a a r m q
a E m a S
y ; —
3 q
E
p
d
9 ;; s"
c o 2 q,` -
q
E
3 c a
E tl
W - E '' c — - -
o
Q
a
E W m s d o
W - a a -_
F° f r
zz c W^_`. .
0 _ v
y
243
XxN
1 N f' 1 ,,',.

V Vl lD
titi
y :

O
u
p
m
L a.
q

QQQQQ Q QQQQ Q Q
p
v
m
y
N
Z
ZZ

ZZ Z ZZZZ Z Z
a
3 OQ
UO
O
Qa O-'
muc0c
e- I N
L
N
NC fp
Q
pj
Ol oo FO Q m c ti — a
a°
O
v
N
H
W .

C. rj fp O
v
Y
O
O
O p tu no ou ... o
O U `^
a
C
O
z a -?
Q v , o
o LL
O
m m ^
Q
z U \
Q
1 l"I a"1
aNUVU
00 O O .'
O
C
7 C ' V
777
d fh
K OC d' d VOl ]
QVlVl !n
v > > > o ?
V
a
vvv
a
CC C ,
777
V
1p
C
C C . fp pq a+ LL
a a
QQQ
dQ LL Q (JW LL LL LL I o
C
a
O
y
mq
i
a aa
a
aaaaaa a a
Q
o
o QZ
zzzz z zzzzz z z
a
a Q`
o
Q
av0
N
a
NO
m° 0/
a+
N
I n' 1 O

O O O O
WO O
N
V
1 tD
n
N M'
1 l y t/ v}
y N m ^V .

M R G
a u -
o
a
m m n
oo
nv
NQ
N
M
N N ,,.
t/
1 t/1.
a °
N .

Y
0 VT VT t/} ` ..,.

O
a
N
oyv
W
a
a+
E
o
o
u
W ry a a
E °
v
o
a
o
Q
o
zo
v c
C
N
N
m
Ea
N fp
u
V
c
c
tv ',
O
i m -
Q
v
m
cN
NL ...
d i'
c
p a ,.
j ,
O
N ao
v
N ' 00 O . '^
u a
Z Ul ,,. pp pp `
za N «
a v ,
CC
9Ya Ol u u u J Y
C
co
j
CC o -
09na
N
N f0 f0 >
V "^
m
Q
C
E G.'
O1 C .
0 CJ
v O
D
6 LL
i
C VI
N
LL LL F ¢
O
Nh
O In tl0
N
O N
C
C f0 c4 ` ` y
y
c
O
a >
o
Q
m
o
i, ? c
c
v v ° a
a
y
d N
7 LL > > •" £
o
N
Q i i i
O
O c `
i
v
OO
op E -
H H a` °' y
c c _
ao
m
mm
ca.i a o >
E
E
z ._ ` `
o
A
Q
p
a
N `^ ' a ' O ,,,
1L
nn uGli
v'
a
v i v i -
aoY a . L, a
N t0
VI
J
y u n n ,
Q
C
Q y >,
vi vvi
N '
o
n R ¢ .
n
O
OO O C!

U VI IA
a
m -
o
N N
N
j tTn "
v
Q Q
p
o
oa t5

C I I I
d LL
C 7
V 7 .

N ti 7
a
ai
c
Q O E " - °
Q
Y
C
C
0OO
C
a.

LL LL
n
E
N
LL
n
LL
j
zs s
Q
O o ` v „ ' t E d „
9 v
3 C' N r
d' .., "
LL > >
0 OJ 7 7 2r O O
O
O
J
y ln
a
JJ J ,..,,., V) V) W LL LL w `
C
0 Oy
0 mK N1O
m
m
Q
v
H C9
aa a
oaw C
22 244
Xxh
O
N
OO 00O
N 01 01 tY
a
p
1 Q
N M .- I N
M
Q a .

M
y
M
OR O
N eti 1
O O .

R 01
MN I u1 f Y1O
M
aO
F"
f1
O t0M 00
C 00 I N f1 00
M
rlMM 01 01 1 00
O l0 t0 01
O D / i /
1 M -
I
N 1 M
O V7
rl rl e1
H
M ei
O tD
rl
N
N
OO 1 I trl Ol O O
N tA t/
O N 1DO tA t/
OOO
0 I 01
N
M
V
W
n
p j V1
U
p
NM V? 00 lD
O
N Ll Vl
NM
G
N
n
UO
O
i
v
im QMl
M
m
O
01m
a c+
m rn
o ic " n
n c m
o
o
ap ri
a ri t cria oo
aN
NO I M lll lD
a
M L. flM 00
O
1D I c
N
V1 V1
C
N VT N lD
C
Vl
OOO
rl 00 O .-- I V1 1D cM-7 c^-I 0
W
n v m m ^ o .
1 00 00
n M (
h
O O OM e- 1 NM
N 01 00 l!
1 00 N ^
M c- I o0 00
p
O l0O
N o0 rrl
VM V
N e- I
N M I f+)
N
V} V} LT ^ N i/) - i "
mn r mv
o
O1MO1 Ol VN1
O
Ol 00M N
p r+ l' / 1'
OO V1 ^ D c1M O'
N I Ol 00 00 Ql
b t+'
1 c- I V N
p c
m rn rn rn N m m
M
N j fyj ryj i/1
V
l0 <yj Ll (j
Cl
V? V? VT tiN V? ti
M
Y y/} V?
Ol
N I 00 u"
1 NV lD Vl
00 f
1 01 Ol N ^
OM l0 "
1!'
1 l0 lD .--
I M
V V1 -- I
N
M l0 lD Ol I
M lD --
1N lD
O
N Ol 00
O I M 1 N I I
0 N rj n'
j fyj
q
Vl f'j
V1 ey
a
t/ tA Ll
N VT -- i "
l0 -
N-I eN-1
V M e- I t/ lll lD "
00 NN I lD
b
lD lD
N
O m On N O [ v
O
N Ol 00 I l0 C1
O I [
t
M
N
N
y} M } u1
i/T t/? V} ^ N -- I N
a
I Ol u'
lOO O O Ol
O
W W D V} Vt
H t/ VT V
T
0 00 00 tll N M v1
N D N W i Q1 W l0 N N N M
a
N vl v?v
O t/
1 t/ t t/) a/ 1
0o m n
N
NWt0
ry an ' y !
C
V? V} 41 f1 O O O O O O O O O
O tn
O tn t/ tn Vf Vf tn t
Q' u
N '
iN
N
N
N
a
n
N
vi
ya
o`oa
oN
a` samr
a, c
c
GJ ~
Y
N
O C
L
ei uf
N f6N
c -
o a"
a
c
U E ..-. ..°'+
r c
3 W
V VI
3 i @ \ O C ?
N
v i
i a °
1 on+.
c
o o >
cm
M
C ` .

O
M F+
Y
J GJ
d
N O Y 7 «
a
X
Z
J
p v .
j
vf 00
WW
C
Wx
n C ;-+
y N
N fp
U
O G 0
Q
w vl lJ
y
C m a `
a
F
w
T
vi
V
OCCO F- °
n pav2
23 245
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
Evaluation of Identified Revenues
This section identifies, describes, and presents the updated evaluation of the funding sources for the remaining levee improvement work previously identified in the 2016 APR. The combined use of these sources is dependent on several factors including implementation timing. A discussion of the implementation timing of the planned funding mechanisms follows this section.

RD 17 LSRP Project— RD 17 Assessment Revenues/ State EIP Fundinq Appendix C provides an updated expenditure schedule for the LSRP as well as the supporting analysis of the identified revenues for implementation with funds from the RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment and DWR' s EIP program. This analysis supports the net revenues identified in Table 5 that are available to support the implementation of the Phase 4 Project after completion of the LSRP.

Development Fees& Advance Funding
Currently, SJAFCA, through an amended collection agreement with the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, Stockton, and San Joaquin County is collecting fees as a condition of development within the Project' s benefit area. On July 12, 2022, SJAFCA adopted Resolution R- 22- 135 approving an Update to the Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Nexus Study ( Nexus Study Update) and a related collection agreement amendment( reference Appendix B). Subsequently, the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, Stockton, and San Joaquin County adopted the Nexus Study Update and authorized the collection of the new fee between September and November 2022. As such, the portions of the Mossdale Tract Area that include planned development projects that lie within the 200- year Floodplain ( the Phase 4 Project benefit area) will need to mitigate the impact of development in the floodplain and pay the Regional DIF. This funding will ensure that improvements can be made to flood control infrastructure to mitigate increases in expected annual damages.

To ensure that sufficient revenues are made available from this mechanism to meet the near- term cash flow demands of the project, the Land Use Agencies entered into agreements with landowners to advance some of the fee obligation and utilize this advanced funding as credit toward payment of the fee. An analysis showing an allocation of the costs to planned development is documented in the " Mossdale Tract Area:

Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Final Nexus Study Update" dated November 16, 2022. The current financing plan reflected within this APR projects reflects the updated fee rate effective as of December 2022. Appendix B shows the actual revenues received through November 2022 and projections of the revenues to come from the Updated Regional Fee Program overtime. In addition, the analysis considers the escalation of the fee rates over time based on the approved indexed escalation rate incorporated into the approved updated Fee.

To continue to advance the Phase 4 Project the Land Use Agencies have utilized Agency and developer advance funding and fee revenue collections. This funding has been utilized to support ongoing efforts including the formation of the EIFD and the planning and implementation of an Overlay Assessment expected in 2024. Early funding is expected to be reimbursed to the Agencies( in the future) or, in the case of developer advanced funding, creditable toward the DIF Program as described above.

L IARSEN WURZEL
8 Associates, Inc.
z4 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
246
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
New Special Assessment
Given the fact that a significant portion of the beneficiaries of the Phase 4 Project are already developed properties within the Mossdale Tract Area, the 2016 APR described a plan to move forward with the formation of a new special benefit assessment district that would overlay the existing RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment the previously described OAD). RD 17' s existing Mossdale Tract Assessment currently generates more than

3. 2 million per year with an average residential assessment of approximately $ 96 per year. To test the feasibility of a new OAD, a detailed analysis of the apportionment of special benefits for the Phase 4 Project was completed as part of the financial analyses associated with the Governance Analysis completed in late 2017. Since that time, SJAFCA has engaged an Assessment Engineer to develop an Engineer' s Report and support the formation of the OAD. As noted earlier in the report, Willdan has been engaged and completed a preliminary analysis. The new OAD is assumed to have an expected average residential per parcel assessment of approximately $ 82 in addition to the existing assessment. With this assumed average residential per parcel assessment and similar apportionment as the existing RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment, the overlay assessment is expected to generate an additional $ 2. 625 million per year. Appendix D provides an analysis of the revenues expected to be generated by the OAD taking into consideration the increased revenue to come from new development over time. The tables presented in Appendix D support the overlay assessment revenues presented in Table 5.

SJAFCA' s current plan is to advance the formation of the new OAD in early 2024 such that revenues from the new OAD would start to be received during FY 2024/ 25. Once formed, and in combination with the tax increment revenues from a new EIFD ( described below), the two funding mechanisms would provide the necessary annual revenues to both directly fund a portion of the design and planning of the project, and help service future debt that could be issued to provide the needed cash flow for the project.

Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
In July 2022 SIAFCA' s Member Land Use Agencies formed the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District. The EIFD allows for the use of Tax Increment Financing for the regional flood control improvements. The entities initiated the process by forming a new Public Financing Authority that includes members of the legislative bodies of the public agencies as well as two public members. The Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District Public Financing Authority( EUIFD PFA) prepared an Infrastructure Financing Plan ( IFP) that describes the funding for the construction of regional flood control improvements that provide benefit to the Mossdale Tract Area. The IFP identifies the participating taxing entities within the EIFD and the share of Property Tax Increment each participating entity in the EIFD would allocate allocate to the Project over time.

EIFD/ Special 8enefit District Financing
Appendix F provides reference to the location of IFP on SJAFCA' s website. This document includes an analysis of the projected revenues to come from the proposed EIFD. The revenues projected within the IFP are reflected within the financing plan presented in this Adequate Progress Report. To ensure sufficient revenues are available to finance the improvements, SJAFCA plans to issue debt secured by a combination of Assessment District and Tax Increment Revenues received by the EIFD and pledged to SJAFCA. An updated L pLARSEN WURZEL
Assaciates, Inc.
25 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
247
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
analysis of the combined financing capacity of the proposed OAD and EIFD has been prepared and is included within Appendix F. Figure 2 below illustrates the revenues, proposed bond issuances, and debt service associated with the planned financing.

The updated Financing Plan assumes the following borrowings take place:

One borrowing in 2025 yielding approximately$ 39. 94 million in proceeds( estimated$ 43. 25 Million Par) takes place. The borrowings would be secured by the proposed assessment district with one year of collection history and rate covenant of 1. 2x Maximum Annual Debt Service. The current financing plan assumes a 30- year issue with 3. 6% interest rates and escalating debt services. The issue is with an estimated 100% of Maximum Annual Debt Service reserve fund.

A 2027 borrowing yielding$ 45 million in proceeds ( approximately$ 48. 84 million Par) takes place.

This borrowing would be secured by a pledge of Tax Increment from the EIFD as well as an assumption that debt service coverage could be met with a backup pledge of any net assessment revenues. The current financing plan assumes a 30- year issue with 4. 6% interest rate and level debt service. The issue is sized with a 1x Maximum Annual Debt Service Reserve Fund.

The Financing Plan presented with this 2022 Annual APR Update has refined the Overlay and EIFD Revenue Analyses previously presented. As shown in IFP referenced in Appendix F, the EIFD revenue analysis has been prepared to present the following property tax revenue allocation rate scenarios as follows:

EIFD Contribution Rate
Initial Years
Affected Taxing Entity ( 2021- 2029) 2030- 2032 2033- 2043 2044- 2061 Maximum Tax Rate Scenario
City of Lathrop 10. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0%
City of Manteca 5. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0%
Clty Of StOCkto 1. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0%
San Joaquin County 47. 3% 20. 0% 20. 0% 20. 0%
Variable Tax Rate Scenario
City of Lathrop 10. 0% 13. 0% 9. 5% 4. 5%
City of Manteca 5. 0°/ a 13. 0% 9. 5% 4. 5%
City of Stockton 1. 0% 13. 0% 9. 5% 4. 5%
San Joaquin County 47. 3% 13. 0% 9. 5% 4. 5°/ a
The Variable Tax Rate Scenario has been modeled and created additional capacity to cover the needed debt service of the proposed bonding over time. Need is shown in Table E1 and demonstrated in the chart presented in Figure 2.

L LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
26 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
248
TC
O DJ Q
A
N
8 8
8 8
0 o
6 D
o
0 8
88 o D, I .
o
e rn s ' 79 z o• X °o o
D
A m w
o
Q
p
D
nr
in
0, 6'
m
m ;
2 tn
z' j 0, 2
N v ' D
v'",
m ' m
p i
Y'' Le"'.'. Q ; e '
A tJt
r
3 a:«s' o `
N
3 m '^
v
v ° p' 2
d
O r, r a IY 6'
o a'
O o ' O ='
a o ' ' rM3
Q
O
k. _ . . .

O s
N ;
N
O
Q N
g ` TI N V1 A \ ; 3 9
o,
o
o
D
y
W
Ro F i a T1 n ry
p.

X r'
tp
v
w
c''
R
fy, '' S t'
0f^
m
7`
c
1 tp
y
rD
NG O ' p
fD - 1 r'
7 0 a, 01 „ N a, s
4 —
v
N a,
n,
m s
v,
7 v
0 z '
n Qo
j O , 3
N { r
m . a
Q tn
o
n
p •
c'
o
i '
C
D
ro p ro F
o ryV
C O. 3
y
rt
p
4 b '
urr3 _ ____ 9 ,
yC m '
o
O
a p c -` v
p m $ ,
o
y
O np
i ' n - -
a ' n ^ O' I
a
C .. r°
w
O
E c, o ' rp
p t0
c
3 Vf iD
3 0o o ?
r
v '
n ; ' .... o .
r. r.

A
Y s ' n.

NG
f1
V1
n
f
o
0 ; ` (
N
C
T 1p G
TO
O
3 in ' ^ . `_
a
il
S m
S
A
0 i t l
N
O
N•
Z
n '
fD 00
V
3 Y O` 3 o
6, y(
t A. n
m ? : n, 3 . _ _ o „ v v n
3 ~
rr++,,
a
p
C
c
W
dQ
O
M r'
8 tb
m
N (/]
iv O`
N Q)
7 Q
0w
O .$
D `
n oN
p
h
W
o
Q
s
a
Qa S1
n
S
m
D p' Q c y ' Qs s
o
o
s,
o
o
1a o A
ss m.. , m_,..___ Q ,
Co
Q OS. 6
0 Os, A c
Doc
aN
flO
n fl iv
w p
249
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
The OAD provides revenues sufficient to bridge the gap between available Tax Increment Revenues and the required debt service needed to provide coverage for the bonds. In addition, available net revenues from the OAD, after filling the gap for the required Tax Increment Financing, would be available and authorized to provide ongoing operations and maintenance for the improved levee system.

Member Agency Advanced Funding Agreement
As noted previously, to ensure that SJAFCA has sufficient funding to construct the Project, the Cities of Stockton, Manteca and Lathrop ( Agreeing Member Agencies) plan to enter into an Advance Funding Agreement with SJAFCA whereby sufficient funding would be made available to SJAFCA to supplement funding from the above identified funding sources. Under this concept, SJAFCA would enter into an Advanced Funding Agreement, whereby the Agreeing Member Agencies would fund, on a predetermined specified schedule ( a schedule of Capital Calls), the funding needed to support Adequate Progress. The Agreeing Member Agencies and SJAFCA are currently developing the terms of the agreement pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding( Appendix E). Currently, based upon the assumptions regarding the funding and financing plan described within this report, the Agreeing Member Agencies would be providing a total of

91. 1 million.

The source of funding from the Agreeing Member Agencies would not be managed by SJAFCA. To the extent the Agreeing Member Agencies would be relying on developer funding through land secured financing ( e. g. a Member Agency formed CFD, CSCDA' s Statewide Community Infrastructure (" SCIP") Program or CMFA' s Bond Opportunities for Land Development (" BOLD") Program) SJAFCA would cooperate with the Member Agency to support and establish the underlying infrastructure funding obligation. For example, this could take place through the preparation of any needed updates of the current Development Impact Fee program, coordination with the Member Agencies' public financing team, or otherwise as needed. It is expected that an Advanced Funding Agreement would be fully executed prior to the next Annual Adequate Progress Report update.

Status and Schedule for Funding & Financing Implementation The following matrix outlines a conceptual schedule and details the status for the implementation of the contemplated funding mechanisms and associated financing of the improvements.

Activity Start End buration( 1) Status`
MOU Principles lune 1, 2016 N/ A Completed
Prepare and Review ULOP June 1, 2016 N/ A Completed
Adequate Progress Report
Enter into MOU June 30, 2016 N/ A Completed
Adopt ULOP Adequate Progress July 2, 2016 N/ A Completed Findings
Develop Funding/ Governance March 2016 N/ A Completed
Evaluation Framework
L p

LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
28 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
250
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
Activity Start' End Duration( i) Status
Prepare Financial & Governance September N/ A Completed Analysis Supporting Governance 2017
Entity& Financial Plan
Implement Governance Entity
Enter into JPA&( SJAFCA December N/ A Completed
Reorganization) 2017
Imp/ ement Fundinp Mechanisms
Interim Impact Fee April N/ A Completed
2017
Regional Impact Fee January December N/ A Completed
Adoption 2018 2018
Regional Impact Fee June November 17 months Completed
Update 2021 2022
Overlay Assessment June August 18 months Preliminary
District Formation 2018 2023 remaining Analysis Completed Implementation
Scoped &
Consultants
Engaged
EIFD Adoption and EIFD September August N/ A Completed
Formation 2018 2022 Administration
Ongoing
Member Agency August December 17 Months MOU Executed
Advanced Funding 2022 2023 AdvancedFunding
Agreement Agreement being
Negotiated
Implement Financinp Entity/
Mechanism
Issue Debt 2025 & 2027 N/ A
The above information will continue to be updated annually as progress is made. The information above coincides with the cash flow model assumptions presented within Table 5 and the supporting analysis appendices.

L LARSEN WURZEL
8 Associates, Inc.
2( 1801014 Mossdale APR 2022 Update 2023 0123. docx
251
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX A:

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROLAGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 19- 06:

RESOLUTION TO ADOPT POLICY ON ADAPTING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA OF SJAFCA IN LIGHT OF CLIMATE CHANGE JANUARY 29, 2021, TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM PREPARED BY KJELDSEN SINNOCK & NEUDECK, INC. RE: SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACTAREA ULDC ADJUSTMENTS FOR CLIMATE CHANGECONSOLIDATED COST ESTIMATE Reso 19- 06 SJAFCA Resolution Adopting Policy re: Climate Change.......................................... A1 Tech Memo Technical Memo Detailing Updated Cost Estimate................................................. A7 wA
LARSEN WURZEt
A5SOCi0iE5, nC.
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 OI18. docx 252
RESOLUTION NO. SJAFCA 99- 06

SAN JOAQUIN AREA

FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
1 RESOLUTION T4 ADOPT POLICY ON ADAPTING DESIGN

STANDARDS FOR THE MOSSDALE TRACT AREA OF SJA CA IN
LlGHT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
WHEREAS, the overwhelming consensus of the international scientific community, as established by the Intergovernmental Panel an Climate Change and confirmed by the Nafional Academy of Sciences, is that climate change is a real and increasingly urgent threat that demands action at every level of government; and V1/ HEREAS, fhe Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta ( hereinafter Delta) is a unique nafiural and geographic feature of the State of California, and is the largest estuary on the Pacific Coast of the United States encompassing an area of over 73Q, QQ0 acres with islands and tracts of rich fertile soil surrounded by miles of sloughs and winding channels protected by levees; and
WHEREAS, climate change is direcfily impacting San Joaquin County citizens through sea fevel rise, flooding, increased wildfires, drought, and air pallution harming the public health; and
WHEREAS, further climate change is expected to impact the region' s temperatures, precipitation and sea level with consequences for the area population, agriculture, environment and infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, to protect these critical resources, the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency must continually evaluate the risks and impacts from climate changer uncertainties and identify appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies utilizing the best available science in conjunction with stakeholders for adapting design standards for the Mossdale Tract Area af SJAFCA.

NOW, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, AS F LLOWS:

That the Policy on Climate Change is hereby approved and adopted, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit " A" and incorporated by this reference. j SJAFCA Resolution 19- 06

Page 1 of 2 ends

A- 1
253
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2019.

SUS DRA E, Chair
of the S n Jaaquin Area
Fload ontrol Agency
ATTEST:
ty-''_/'`
HRIS ELIAS, Secretary
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

S O L. SHA IR , L.egal Counsel
f r e San Jo quin rea
Flood Control ncy
SJAFCA Resolution 19- 06

Page 2 ends

A- 2
254
LL!!
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Policy for Adapting Design Standards
for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA
in Light of Climate Change Uncertainties
February 7, 2019
Introduction
The San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) is advancing a program for increasing the level of flood protection provided by the Mossdale Tract levees through ( i) development of locally- funded improvements, ( ii) partnering with the State on potential State funding of improvements, and/ or ( iii) the pursuit of a Federally-authorized set of improvements. In the development of locally-funded improvements and other improvements which may be cost- shared with the State and Federal governments, it is necessary to select the appropriate future hydrology, considering climate change estimates, to inform design- level work. Unfortunately, the uncertainties ( magnitude, timing, and nature of frequency) associated with accurately predicting that future hydrology requires that the agency balance the flood risk associated with understating that hydrology with the financial costs associated with overstating that hydrology. The purpose of this document is to provide a Board- adopted policy for managing that risk specifically for the Mossdale Tract levees.

In addition, the passage of SB5 has imposed on communities in the Central Valley an obligation to ensure that future development will be subject to at least 200- year flood protection. The Department of Water Resources ( DWR) has developed guidance for the Urban Level Of[ Flood] Protection ( ULOP) including findings that must be made Available Data on Climate Change Through Hydrologic Studies Climate change, as it applies to Mossdale Tract levees, is comprised of both tailwater conditions as well as watershed hydrology. Tailwater conditions are important because water surface profiles are calculated from downstream to upstream, and tailwater elevation ( also known as " stage") is an input to the model. In the case of the San Joaquin River, the downstream limit of the hydraulic model is roughly the Deep Water Ship Channel near the Smith Canal Gate project. The stage at that location is affected by sea level, tide cycles, hydraulics of the Delta, physical configuration of the Delta in a given event, storm surge, flood flows from the various tributary rivers and streams entering the Delta, and to some extent, wind setup ( if all or part of the Delta were to become a large body of open water in the future, for instance). Sea level rise is an essential component of tailwater conditions to consider.

Although sea level rise at the Golden Gate Bridge has been studied extensively, the science and engineering of predicting San Joaquin River tailwater conditions and watershed hydrology is new. The only study to date to address both aspects of climate i
A- 3
255
L 9a
change for the San Joaquin River is the work by the State associated with the 2017 Update of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ( CVFPP). That study concludes that significant changes are likely for both tailwater conditions and San Joaquin River flows as a result of climate change. For example, the 200-year event in the year 2067 is estimated by the 2017 CVFPP as a tailwater stage of 12. 6', a stage which would overtop numerous Delta islands and overwhelm many existing and proposed facilities. In terms of watershed hydrology, the CVFPP also predicts a tripling of 200-year flood flows by the year 2067.

Additional Relevant Information
Until the development of the 2017 CVFPP Update, communities developing programs of improvements were required, under the ULOP guidelines, to address the risk of climate change without DWR generated estimates of tailwater conditions coupled with watershed hydrology. For example, in preparing adequate progress reports under ULOP for the River Islands Community of Lathrop, the City of Lathrop designed to the current hydrology, incorporated information from consensus sea level rise, and then added a further foot to the stage to address the uncertainty of changes to watershed hydrology as a result of climate change. Similarly, projects designed on the Sacramento River system have also incorporated additional stage or freeboard to address the uncertainty of changes to watershed hydrology as a result of climate change.

During the development of the 2017 CVFPP Update, commentators provided written comments to DWR regarding the significant changes projected by the Update and whether investment decisions should be made based on the Update. In response, DWR provided the following:

The 2017 CVFPP Update climate change analysis was used for system- scale planning and development of State policy in accordance with the directives and guidance of AB 2800, Executive Order B 30- 15, Executive Order S- 13- 08, Public Resources Code 71155, and the California Natural Resources Agency publication, Safeguarding California: Reducing Climate Risk ( 2014)" at a programmatic level. It has not been used to make investment- level decisions, project design, and implementation. While the 2017 CVFPP Update refines the overall near and long- term investment needs established in the 2017 CVFPP, it is not a decision document. Given the current state of climate change science and its uncertainties, application of the climate change projections for design purposes would not be appropriate at this time.

A more detailed programmatic account of the climate change analyses and summary of the findings is presented in the supporting document " 2017 CVFPP Update — Climate Change Analysis Technical Memorandum." The document also recommends further study:

Addressing uncertainty by evaluating a broader set of future climate scenarios, or sensitivity analyses.
2 A- 4
256
HI IT "A„
Additional study to gain insight about reservoir climate vulnerability and potential adaptation needs.

The use of levee fragility and flood frequency curves is incorporated into the probabilistic methodology used for the CVFPP flood risk and potential life loss evaluations of the urban levee improvements and systemwide actions. Levee fragility data was developed based on the Nonurban/ Urban Levee Evaluations program undertaken by the State. Further details on the methods and sources of data can be found in the " 2017 CVFPP Update — Scenario Technical Analyses Summary Report" which supports the 2017 CVFPP Update.

Agency Policy
Based on the statement from DWR, it is not expected that SJAFCA use the 2017 CVFPP Update as a basis for design- and investment- level decisions. However, the trend of the 2017 CVFPP Update demonstrates that climate change will increase both the flows projected to flow down the San Joaquin River and increase the tailwater stages. DWR' s climate change estimates are for 50 years in the future only, and those estimates show the trends are still worsening at the end of that period with no eventual " leveling out" of the effects.

SJAFCA's policy for design- and investment-level decisions must address this trend and the risk associated with uncertainty without using the DWR estimates which were not prepared for this purpose. The Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency acknowledges that this policy may result in a future finding by a land use agency that the designed ( or potentially constructed) project will not be able to provide 200-year flood protection in light of changing conditions caused by climate change or other factors, and that achieving and maintaining a particular level of flood protection often requires a community to recommit itself to implement further measures.

Therefore, it is the policy of the Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency that design- and investment- level decisions shall incorporate the following elements ( which are considered to be no, low, or medium regret to address the uncertainty of climate change) until such time as that uncertainty is reduced.

Incorporation of additionat stage at the downstream boundary of the San Joaquin River hydraulic model to cover " intermediate" estimates of sea level rise per U. S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance, plus an additional factor for uncertainty; The inclusion of some additional measure of stage in levee design. This additional stage will differ in different reaches to be determined by SJAFCA staff based upon input from consultants and partner agencies, but is expected to be in the zero to three- foot range;
3 A- 5
257
LL 7!
Where real estate is being acquired for project improvements ( and where land use coordination as described below is not adequate), SJAFCA will acquire the necessary real estate to support potential future levee raises and/ or extensions based on the 2017 CVFPP climate change hydrology;
Coordination with relevant land- use agencies in and around current and future levee alignments to ensure approved development can accommodate expanded levee footprints and extended levee alignments;
At least every three years, and more often when the state of the science demands, staff shall review available studies and models and make recommendations to the Board whether this policy needs to be updated.

SJAFCA will request that each land use agency within the Mossdale Tract annually provide to SJAFCA a summary of any findings made toward adequate progress;
SJAFCA will develop cost estimates to provide SJAFCA with necessary resources to further study and evaluate this issue through and after project completion.
4 A- 6
258
K. 1 LD EIti.1 Stephen K, Sinnock, P. E.

C „ ChristopherH. Neudedc, P. E.

IV I` l E U D E C K
Neal T. Colwell, P. E.
8arry 0'Regan, P.E.

It" 1C. CIVIL ENGtNEERS& LANq 5URVEYORS
2255- 0050
08- 300- 020

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Q, pFEs rpN,
January 29, 2021 4 • ti,
Project: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency p
9 Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Climate Change Adjustment ExP, y3t12p, * r
Subject: Consolidated Cost Estimate q
Fo CAFp`
t'~
Prepared by: Erik E. Almaas, PE
Reviewed by: Christopher H. Neudeck, PE

1. Introduction
Detailed analyses have previously been performed on the existing levee system conditions of Reclamation District No. 17 ( RD17) in order to determine the extent of Urban Levee Design Criteria ULDC) compliance. Documentation of the anatyses in the form of a ULDC Engineer' s Report in 2016 2016 Study) was performed by a team consisting of Peterson, Brustad, Inc. ( PBI), Kjeldsen, Sinnock and Neudeck, Inc. ( KSN), and ENGEO, Inc. The results of the analyses indicated that substantial improvements were needed to the RD17 levees, including a proposed eastward extension of the RD17 Dryland Levee. The overall estimated cost of these improvements amounted to nearly $ 137 million, based on 2015 dollars.

In 2019, a new hydrological and hydraulic evaluation ( 2019 Study) was performed by PBI to refine potential climate change impacts in accordance with San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency SJAFCA) policy. The results of this new evaluation indicated substantial elevated levels to the 200- year Design Water Surface Elevation ( DWSE) along the RD17 levee, especially at the upstream end of the RD17 boundary. Additional improvements were identified based on the updated climate change evaluation, including the need to extend the proposed RD17 Dryland Levee extension even further to the east. The overall estimated cost of these incremental improvements amounted to nearly $ 57 million, based on 2015 dollars.

The purpose of this technical memorandum is to summarize the levee assessment associated with consolidating the cost estimates from the 2016 Study and the 2019 Study into a single cost estimate that is then updated to 2021 dollars.

2. Levee Assessment
This levee assessment covers the RD17 levee from Station 0+ 00 to Station 959+00. It also covers a proposed Dryland Levee Extension that is required to extend the existing Dryland Levee eastward in order to meet ULDC compliance. A summary of the levee segments that were analyzed is shown below in Table 1.

Corporaie Office ?? N Pershing Avenue N Stockton. CA 95203 ( 209- 946- 0268 vv,r,u. ksninc com tlest Sacramenta 155 Harbor 6ouleva d Suife ji Vdest Sacramento CA 95691 ( 916- 403- 59t 259

K TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
NJanuary 29, 2021

Page 2 of 4 ends

Table 1 - Summary of Analyzed Levee Segments
L uee gment Sta#ion rc r ' Station Ta S r a nt S#a#us
French Camp Slough 0+ 00 101+ 00 Existing
San Joaquin River 101+ 00 822+ 80 Existing
Walthall Slough 822+ 80 853+ 50 Existing
Dryland Levee 853+ 50 959+ 00 ' Existing
Dryland Levee Extension 959+ 00 1104+ 20 2
Proposed

3. Data Sources
Existing data sources that were utilized in the levee assessment are as follows:

Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) Evaluation — Identify Necessary Improvements and Cost Estimate, prepared by KSN in 2016.

Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Adjustments for Climate Change— Cost Estimate, prepared by KSN in 2019

4. Deficiency Results
There is a total of 20 ULDC criteria that were evaluated during both the 2016 Study and the 2019 Study. The results of the evaluations revealed that improvements were needed to satisfy several of the criteria. Each ULDC criteria is shown below in Table 2 and is denoted as to whether a particular criterion was identified as requiring improvements based on the 2016 Study and 2019 Study.

Table 2- Necessary Improvements as per ULDC Criteria
Irt .` a n
f iC
tJ c3 r a udy

7. 1 Design Water Surface Elevation

7. 2 Minimum Top of Levee X

7. 3 Soil Sampling, Testing, and Logging

7. 4 Slope Stability for Intermittently Loaded Levees X X

7. 5 Underseepage for Intermittently Loaded Levees X X

7. 6 Frequently Loaded Levees

7. 7 Seismic Vulnerability

7. 8 Levee Geometry X X

7. 9 Interfaces and Transitions

7. 10 Erosion X

7. 11 Right- of-Way X X

7. 12 Encroachments X X
The analysis of the existing Dryland Levee in the 2016 Study ended at Station 972+ 25. On behalf of the City of Manteca, a subsequent study was performed by Drake Haglan and Associates in order to identify a recommended alternative of the proposed Dryland Levee Extension. This recommended alternative alignment, and its connection to the existing RD17 Dryland Levee, differed from the assumptions made in the 2016 Study.

The end of the analysis was retracted to Station 959+ 00 in the 2019 Study based on the updated starting point of the Dryland Levee E ension.
2 The end point of the Dryland Levee Extension was identified as Station 1027+ 25 in the 2016 Study. Based on the climate change adjustments to the DWSE, the Dryland Levee Extension was extended to Station 1104+ 20 in the 2019 Study.

A- 8
260

K TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
3 January 29, 2021
N Page 3 of 4
J `!' I. 11'
I# C'i li+C Y '

7. 13 Penetrations X

7. 14 Floodwalls, Retaining Walls, and Closure Structures

7. 15 Animal Burrows

7. 16 Levee Vegetation

7. 17 Wind Setup and Wave Runup

7. 18 Security

7. 19 Sea Level Rise

7. 20 Emergency Actions

5. Consolidation of Cost Estimates in 2015 Dollars
The overall estimated project cost from the 2016 Study is $ 136, 885, 000, based on 2015 dollars. The individual projects that were identified in the 2016 Study are shown below in Table 3.

Table 3- Summary of Original ULDC Evaluation Costs from 2016 Study Pr j ; w ti fi atia r cs
No; Fr a r ' P iij i r =`, , .

2. 1 822+ 80 972+ 25 Dryland Levee Reconstruction and Seepage Berm 27, 765, 000

5. 1 119+ 50 192+ 00 Cutoff Wall 10, 224, 000

5. 2 190+ 50 297+ 75 Seepage Berm 19, 501, 000

5. 3 311+ 00 518+ 50 Cutoff Wall 35, 050, 000

10. 1 114+ 00 972+ 25 Erosion Repairs 9, 386, 000

11. 1 0+ 00 972+ 25 Right- of-WayAcquisition ( Existing Deficiencies) 12, 381, 000

11. 2 0+ 00 972+ 25 Right- of-Way Acquisition ( New Improvements) 3, 900, 000

12. 1 112+ 73 815+ 40 Encroachment Remediation 678, 000

13. 1 571+ 35 801+ 00 Pipe Penetration Rehabilitation 2, 128, 000 972+ 25 1027+ 25 Dryland Levee Extension 15, 872, 000
136, 885, 000
The overall estimated project cost from the 2019 Study is $ 56, 587, 000, based on 2015 dollars. The individual projects that were identified in the 2019 Study are shown below in Table 4.

Table 4- Summary of Additional Cosfs Associated with Climate Change from 2019 Study ProjeCt < taticsn. # tic rt s#
t v. , ' rc m . T . : r e t a na i 3
1 192+ 00 212+ 00 Widen Seepage Berm 1, 074, 000
2 312+ 30 339+ 00 Deepen Cutoff Wall 407, 000
3 703+ 00 741+ 30
Cutoff Wall 9, 197, 000
781+ 00 799+ 50
4 570+ 00 822+ 80 Levee Raise along San Joaquin River 12, 002, 000 5 822+ 80 959+ 00 Levee Raise along Walthall Slough / Dryland Levee 7, 414, 000 6 959+ 00 1104+ 20 Dryland Levee Extension 26, 493, 000 56,587,000
The two cost estimates described above from the 2016 Study and the 2019 Study were consolidated into a single cost estimate totally $ 193,472, 000, based on 2015 dollars. By merging and restructuring A- 9
261

K TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
s' January 29, 2021

Page 4 of 4 ends

nc.
similar and/ or overlapping projects from the two studies, the list of projects was refined and narrowed down to a total of 15 identified projects, as shown below in Table 6.

6. Update of Consolidated Cost Estimate to 2021 Doilars The update of the consolidated cost estimate from 2015 dollars to 2021 dollars was accomplished utilizing the Construction Cost Index ( CCI) published monthly by Engineering News- Record ( ENR).

The CCI is an indicator of general construction costs and includes labor and materials components.

ENR uses the CCI to measure how much it costs to purchase a hypothetical package of goods and services and compare it to what it was in a prior year. The CCIs that were used in this assessment are shown below in Table 5.

Table 5- ENR CCJs and Escalation Factor
S ript ilia8 '
ENR CCI ( November 2015) 10092
ENR CCI ( January 2021) 11628
Escalation' Factor 1: 1522
The unit costs of the consolidated cost estimate were then adjusted by multiplying them by the abovedescribed Escalation Factor and rounding up using the same number of significant digits. By doing so, the overall project cost increased to a total of$ 230, 009, 000, based on 2021 dollars.

7. Cost Estimate Conclusions
The consolidated cost estimate to address ULDC levee deficiencies, including the adjustments due to climate change, is summarized below in Table 6. This summary indicates the project costs in both 2015 dollars and 2021 dollars, and it is based on the refined 15 projects as described above.

Table 6- Cost Estimate Summary
Pro ect t tio ; t ioi p, ; - t
1 7 rorn i To r' c#' 1 m
1 119+ 50 148+ 00 Cutoff Wall 7, 950, 000 $ 9, 354, 000 2 172+ 45 192+ 00 Cutoff Wall 4, 464, 000 $ 5, 331, 000 3 190+ 50 247+ 00 Seepage Berm 14, 481, 000 $ 17, 002, 000 4 255+ 50 259+ 50 Seepage Berm 970, 000 $ 1, 138, 000
5 270+ 00 297+ 75 Seepage Berm 6, 295, 000 $ 7, 389, 000 6 311+ 00 362+ 50 Cutoff Wall 10, 084, 000 $ 12, 337, 000 7 388+ 00 518+ 50 Cutoff Wall 25, 374, 000 $ 30, 954, 000 8 570+ 00 822+ 80 Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River 14, 681, 000 $ 17, 390, 000 9 703+ 00 741+ 30 Cutoff Wall 6, 197, 000 $ 7, 673, 000 10 781+ 00 799+ 50 Cutoff Wall 3, 001, 000 $ 3, 716, 000 11 822+ 80 853+ 50 Levee Raise @ Walthall Slough 1, 629, 000 $ 1, 941, 000 12 853+ 50 959+ 00
Levee Raise & Seepage Berm
32, 485, 000 $ 38, 374, 000
@ Dryland Levee
13 0+ 00 959+ 00 Erosion Repairs 9, 386, 000 $ 10, 851, 000 14 0+ 00 959+ 00 Right- of-Way (existing) 12, 381, 000 $ 14, 284, 000 15 959+ 00 1104+ 20 Dryland Levee Extension 44, 094, 000 $ 52, 275, 000 193, 472f000 $ 230, 009, 000
A detailed breakdown of the improvement costs on a project-by- project basis is included in EXHIBIT 1.

A- 10
262
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Climate Change Adjustment
Cost Estimate
EXHIBIT 1
Cost Estimate Breakdown
A- 11
263

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 4,732, 000 ' 5, 567, 500

1. Mobilization 10% $ 418, 800 10% $ 492, 700

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 125, 700 3% $ 147, 900

3. Clearing and Grubbing 5. 4 AC $ 2, 000 $ 10, 800 $ 2, 400 $ 13, 000

5. Deep Mix Method ( DMM) Cutoff Wall 83, 300 SF 20 $ 1, 666, 000 24 $ 1, 999, 200

6. Tracer Wire 2, 900 LF 2 5, 800 3 8, 700

7. Imported Engineered Fill 23, 900 TN 15 $ 358, 500 18 $ 430, 200

8. Class 2 Aggregate Base 2, 100 TN 25 $ 52, 500 29 $ 60, 900

9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe 2 EA $ 45, 000 $ 90, 000 $ 51, 900 $ 103, 800

10. Reconstruct Existing 42" Pipe 6 EA $ 250, 000 $ 1, 500, 000 $ 288, 100 $ 1, 728, 600

11. Air Release Valve 8 EA $ 2, 000 $ 16, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 19, 200

12. 8" Valve 2 EA $ 2, 500 5, 000 $ 2, 900 5, 800

13. 42" Valve 6 EA $ 70, 000 $ 420, 000 $ 80, 700 $ 484, 200

14. Encroachment Removal 3 EA $ 10, 000 $ 30, 000 $ 11, 600 $ 34, 800

15. Encroachment Modification 1 EA $ 20, 000 $ 20, 000 $ 23, 100 $ 23, 100

16. Hydroseeding 128, 300 SF 0. 10 $ 12, 900 0. 12 $ 15, 400 Mangement/ Environmental/ Engineering 1, 893, 000` 2, 227, 300

1. Administration 5% $ 236, 600 5% $ 278, 400

2. Planning 3% $ 142, 000 3% $ 167, 100

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 236, 600 5% $ 278, 400

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 94, 700 2% $ 111, 400

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 473, 200 10°/ a $ 556, 800

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 567, 900 12% $ 668, 100

7. Mitigation 3% $ 142, 000 3% $ 167, 100
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricu tural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Acquisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
f-,
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 12
264

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction ` 2, 656, 400 3, 173, 000

1. Mobilization 10% $ 235, 100 10% $ 280, 800

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 70, 600 3% $ 84, 300

3. Clearing and Grubbing 3. 7 AC $ 2, 000 7, 400 $ 2, 400 8, 900

5. Deep Mix Method ( DMM) Cutoff Wall 88, 000 SF 20 $ 1, 760, 000 24 $ 2, 112, 000

6. Tracer Wire 2, 000 LF 2 4, 000 3 6, 000

7. Imported Engineered Fill 16, 500 TN 15 $ 247, 500 18 $ 297, 000

8. Class 2 Aggregate Base 1, 500 TN 25 $ 37, 500 29 $ 43, 500

9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe 2 EA $ 45, 000 $ 90, 000 $ 51, 900 $ 103, 800

10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe 1 EA $ 60, 000 $ 60, 000 $ 69, 200 $ 69, 200

11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe 1 EA $ 80, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 92, 200 $ 92, 200

12. Air Release Valve 4 EA $ 2, 000 8, 000 $ 2, 400 9, 600

13. 8" Valve 2 EA $ 2, 500 5, 000 $ 2, 900 5, 800

14. 12" Valve 1 EA $ 4, 000 4, 000 $ 4, 700 4, 700

15. 16" Valve 1 EA $ 8, 500 8, 500 $ 9, 800 9, 800

16. Encroachment Removal 3 EA $ 10, 000 $ 30, 000 $ 11, 600 $ 34, 800

17.__ Hydroseeding 88, 000 SF 0. 10 8, 800 0. 12 $ 10, 600 Mangement I Environmental/ Engineering 1, 062, 900 1, 269,400

1. Administration 5% $ 132, 900 5% $ 158, 700

2. Planning 3% $ 79, 700 3% $ 95, 200

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 132, 900 5% $ 158, 700

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 53, 200 2% $ 63, 500

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 265, 700 10% $ 317, 300

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 318, 800 12% $ 380, 800

7. Mitigation 3% $ 79, 700 3% $ 95, 200
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
F,..

N,
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 2 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 13
265

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 8, 142, 200: 9,569, 200

1. Mobilization 3% $ 230, 500 3% $ 270, 900

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 230, 500 3% $ 270, 900

3. Clearing and Grubbing 20. 8 AC $ 2, 000 $ 41, 600 $ 2, 400 $ 50, 000

4. Imported Engineered Fill 159, 200 TN 15 $ 2, 388, 000 18 $ 2, 865, 600

5. Drain Rock Material 99, 200 TN 30 $ 2, 976, 000 35 $ 3, 472, 000

6. Sand Filter Material 49, 400 TN 25 $ 1, 235, 000 29 $ 1, 432, 600

7. Filter Fabric 675, 300 SF 0. 50 $ 337, 700 0. 58 $ 391, 700

8. Class 2 Aggregate Base 4, 200 TN 25 $ 105, 000 29 $ 121, 800

9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe 4 EA $ 45, 000 $ 180, 000 $ 51, 900 $ 207, 600

10. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe 2 EA $ 55, 000 $ 110, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 126, 800

11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe 1 EA $ 80, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 92, 200 $ 92, 200

12. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe 1 EA $ 95, 000 $ 95, 000 $ 109, 500 $ 109, 500

13. Air Release Valve 8 EA $ 2, 000 $ 16, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 19, 200

14. 8" Valve 4 EA $ 2, 500 $ 10, 000 $ 2, 900 $ 11, 600

15. 10" Valve 2 EA $ 3, 000 6, 000 $ 3, 500 7, 000

16. 16" Valve 1 EA $ 8, 500 8, 500 $ 9, 800 9, 800

17. 20" Valve 1 EA $ 18, 000 $ 18, 000 $ 20, 800 $ 20, 800

18. Hydroseeding 743, 100 SF 0. 10 $ 74, 400 0. 12 $ 89, 200 Mangement/ Environmental/ Engineering 3, 257, 300 3, 828, 000

1. Administration 5% $ 407, 200 5% $ 478, 500

2. Planning 3% $ 244, 300 3% $ 287, 100

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 407, 200 5% $ 478, 500

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 162, 900 2% $ 191, 400

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 814, 300 10% $ 957, 000

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 977, 100 12% $ 1, 148, 400

7. Mitigation 3% $ 244, 300 3% $ 287, 100
Real Estate 66T,500 771, 000

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 12. 7 AC $ 25, 000 $ 317, 500 $ 28, 900 $ 367, 100

2. Easement Acquisition 7 EA $ 50, 000 $ 350, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 403, 900 a
i i
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 3 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 14
266

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
i • •
Construction 528, 800 621, 000

1. Mobilization 3% $ 15, 000 3% $ 17, 600

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 15, 000 3% $ 17, 600

3. Clearing and Grubbing 1. 4 AC $ 2, 000 2, 800 $ 2, 400 3, 400

4. Imported Engineered Fill 9, 900 TN 15 $ 148, 500 18 $ 178, 200

5. Drain Rock Material 6, 000 TN 30 $ 180, 000 35 $ 210, 000

6. Sand Filter Material 3, 000 TN 25 $ 75, 000 29 $ 87, 000

7. Filter Fabric 40, 800 SF 0. 50 $ 20, 400 . $ 0. 58 $ 23, 700

8. Class 2 Aggregate Base 300 TN 25 7, 500 29 8, 700

9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe 1 EA $ 55, 000 $ 55, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 63, 400

10. Air Release Valve 1 EA $ 2, 000 2, 000 $ 2, 400 2, 400

11. 10" Valve 1 EA $ 3, 000 3, 000 $ 3, 500 3, 500

12. Hydroseeding 45, 600 SF 0. 10 4, 600 0. 12 5, 500
Mangement/ Environmentall Engineering 211, 800: 248, 800

1. Administration 5% $ 26, 500 5% $ 31, 100

2. Planning 3% $ 15, 900 3% $ 18, 700

3. Environmental and Permitting 5°/ a $ 26, 500 5% $ 31, 100

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 10, 600 2% $ 12, 500

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 52, 900 10% $ 62, 100

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 63, 500 12% $ 74, 600

7. Mitigation 3% $ 15, 900 3% $ 18, 700
Real Estate 67, 500 78, 000

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 7 AC $ 25, 000 $ 17, 500 $ 28, 900 $ 20, 300

2. Easement Acquisition 1 EA $ 50, 000 $ 50, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 57, 700 r.>r z
1 111 111
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 4 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 15
267

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 3, 512; 500 4, 127, 500

1. Mobilization 3% $ 99, 500 3% $ 116, 900

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 99, 500 3% $ 116, 900

3. Clearing and Grubbing 9. 1 AC $ 2, 000 $ 18, 200 $ 2, 400 $ 21, 900

4. Imported Engineered Fill 68, 600 TN 15 $ 1, 029, 000 18 $ 1, 234, 800

5. Drain Rock Material 41, 600 TN 30 $ 1, 248, 000 35 $ 1, 456, 000

6. Sand Filter Material 20, 400 TN 25 $ 510, 000 29 $ 591, 600

7. Filter Fabric 283, 100 SF 0. 50 $ 141, 600 0. 58 $ 164, 200

8. Class 2 Aggregate Base 2, 100 TN 25 $ 52, 500 29 $ 60, 900

9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe 1 EA $ 55, 000 $ 55, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 63, 400

10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe 2 EA $ 60, 000 $ 120, 000 $ 69, 200 $ 138, 400

11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe 1 EA $ 80, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 92, 200 $ 92, 200

12. Air Release Valve 4 EA $ 2, 000 8, 000 $ 2, 400 9, 600

13. 10" Valve 1 EA $ 3, 000 3, 000 $ 3, 500 3, 500

14. 12" Valve 2 EA $ 4, 000 8, 000 $ 4, 700 9, 400

15. 16" Valve 1 EA $ 8, 500 8, 500 $ 9, 800 9, 800

16. Hydroseeding 316, 400 SF 0. 10 $ 31, 700 0. 12 $ 38, 000 Mangement/ Environmentai/ Engineering 1, 405, 300 1, 651, 300

1. Administration 5% $ 175, 700 5°/ a $ 206, 400

2. Planning 3% $ 105, 400 3°/ a $ 123, 900

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 175, 700 5% $ 206, 400

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 70, 300 2% $ 82, 600

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 351, 300 10% $ 412, 800

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 421, 500 12% $ 495, 300

7. Mitigation 3% $ 105, 400 3% $ 123, 900
Real Estate 327, 500' 378, 200

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 5. 1 AC $ 25, 000 $ 127, 500 $ 28, 900 $ 147, 400

2. Easement Ac uisition 4 EA $ 50, 000 $ 200, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 230, 800 N.

Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 5 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 16
268

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 6, 001, 700': 7,343, 200

1. Mobilization 10°/ a $ 531, 200 10% $ 649, 900

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 159, 400 3% $ 195, 000

3. Clearing and Grubbing 10. 8 AC $ 2, 000 $ 21, 600 $ 2, 400 $ 26, 000

4. Degrade Existing Levee( 1/ 3 Height) 23, 500 CY 10 $ 235, 000 12 $ 282, 000

5. Soil- Bentonite( SB) Cutoff Wall 354, 200 SF 8 $ 2, 833, 600 10 $ 3, 542, 000

6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle) 9, 200 CY 10 $ 92, 000 12 $ 110, 400

7. Tracer Wire 5, 200 LF 2 $ 10, 400 3 $ 15, 600

8. Imported Engineered Fill 108, 800 TN 15 $ 1, 632, 000 18 $ 1, 958, 400

9. Class 2 Aggregate Base 3, 900 TN 25 $ 97, 500 29 $ 113, 100

10. Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe 1 EA $ 40, 000 $ 40, 000 $ 46, 100 $ 46, 100

11. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe 1 EA $ 45, 000 $ 45, 000 $ 51, 900 $ 51, 900

12. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe 3 EA $ 55, 000 $ 165, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 190, 200

13. Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe 1 EA $ 75, 000 $ 75, 000 $ 86, 500 $ 86, 500

14. Air Release Valve 6 EA $ 2, 000 $ 12, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 14, 400

15. 6" Valve 1 EA $ 2, 000 2, 000 $ 2, 400 2, 400

16. 8" Valve 1 EA $ 2, 500 2, 500 $ 2, 900 2, 900

17. 10" Valve 3 EA $ 3, 000 9, 000 $ 3, 500 $ 10, 500

18. 14" Valve 1 EA $ 7, 000 7, 000 $ 8, 100 8, 100

19. Hydroseeding 314, 200 SF 0. 10 $ 31, 500 0. 12 $ 37, 800 Mangement/ Environmental/ Engineering 2, 401, 000' 2,937, 500

1. Administration 5% $ 300, 100 5% $ 367, 200

2. Planning 3% $ 180, 100 3°/ o $ 220, 300

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 300, 100 5% $ 367, 200

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 120, 100 2% $ 146, 900

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 600, 200 10% $ 734, 400

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 720, 300 12% $ 881, 200

7. Mitigation 3% $ 180, 100 3% $ 220, 300
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 6 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 17
269

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
i
Construction 15,102, 800 18, 424, 200

1. Mobilization 10% $ 1, 336, 600 10% $ 1, 630, 500

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 401, 000 3% $ 489, 200

3. Clearing and Grubbing 27. 3 AC $ 2, 000 $ 54, 600 $ 2, 400 $ 65, 600

4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height) 59, 500 CY 10 $ 595, 000 12 $ 714, 000

5. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall 827, 000 SF 8 $ 6, 616, 000 10 $ 8, 270, 000

6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle) 23, 200 CY 10 $ 232, 000 12 $ 278, 400

7. Tracer Wire 13, 000 LF 2 $ 26, 000 3 $ 39, 000

8. Imported Engineered Fill 275, 600 TN 15 $ 4, 134, 000 18 $ 4, 960, 800

9. Class 2 Aggregate Base 9, 600 TN 25 $ 240, 000 29 $ 278, 400

10. Reconstruct Existing 4" Pipe 1 EA $ 35, 000 $ 35, 000 $ 40, 400 $ 40, 400

11. Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe 2 EA $ 40, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 46, 100 $ 92, 200

12. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe 2 EA $ 55, 000 $ 110, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 126, 800

13. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe 5 EA $ 60, 000 $ 300, 000 $ 69, 200 $ 346, 000

14. Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe 2 EA $ 75, 000 $ 150, 000 $ 86, 500 $ 173, 000

15. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe 3 EA $ 80, 000 $ 240, 000 $ 92, 200 $ 276, 600

16. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe 1 EA $ 95, 000 $ 95, 000 $ 109, 500 $ 109, 500

17. Reconstruct Existing 36" Pipe 1 EA $ 200, 000 $ 200, 000 $ 230, 500 $ 230, 500

18. Air Release Valve 17 EA $ 2, 000 $ 34, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 40, 800

19. 4" Valve 1 EA $ 1, 500 1, 500 $ 1, 800 1, 800

20. 6" Valve 2 EA $ 2, 000 4, 000 $ 2, 400 4, 800

21. 10" Valve 2 EA $ 3, 000 6, 000 $ 3, 500 7, 000

22. 12" Valve 5 EA $ 4, 000 $ 20, 000 $ 4, 700 $ 23, 500

23. 14" Valve 2 EA $ 7, 000 $ 14, 000 $ 8, 100 $ 16, 200

24. 16" Valve 3 EA $ 8, 500 $ 25, 500 $ 9, 800 $ 29, 400

25. 20" Valve 1 EA $ 18, 000 $ 18, 000 $ 20, 800 $ 20, 800

26. 36" Valve 1 EA $ 55, 000 $ 55, 000 $ 63, 400 $ 63, 400

27. Hydroseeding 796, 000 SF 0. 10 $ 79,600 0. 12 $ 95, 600 Mangement/ Environmental/ Engineering 6, 041, 400 7, 370, 200

1. Administration 5% $ 755, 200 5% $ 921, 300

2. Planning 3% $ 453, 100 3% $ 552, 800

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 755, 200 5% $ 921, 300

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 302, 100 2% $ 368, 500

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 1, 510, 300 10% $ 1, 842, 500

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 1, 812, 400 12% $ 2, 211, 000

7. Mitigation 3% $ 453, 100 3% $ 552, 800
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Acquisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
i
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 7 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 18
270

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 8, 370, 100 9,925, 400

1. Mobilization 3% $ 236, 900 3% $ 281, 000

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 236, 900 3% $ 281, 000

3. Clearing and Grubbing 43. 6 AC $ 2, 000 $ 87, 200 $ 2, 400 $ 104, 700

4. Imported Engineered Fill 339, 700 TN 15 $ 5, 095, 500 18 $ 6, 114, 600

5. Floodwall ( 3' tall) 2, 400 LF 125 $ 300, 000 145 $ 348, 000

6. Class 2 Aggregate Base 18, 800 TN 25 $ 470, 000 29 $ 545, 200

7. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe 3 EA $ 60, 000 $ 180, 000 $ 69, 200 $ 207, 600

8. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe 1 EA $ 80, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 92, 200 $ 92, 200

9. Reconstruct Existing 18" Pipe 4 EA $ 85, 000 $ 340, 000 $ 98, 000 $ 392, 000

10. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe 1 EA $ 95, 000 $ 95, 000 $ 109, 500 $ 109, 500

11. Reconstruct Existing 48" Pipe 1 EA $ 300, 000 $ 300, 000 $ 345, 700 $ 345, 700

12. Air Release Valve 10 EA $ 2, 000 $ 20, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 24, 000

13. 12" Valve 3 EA $ 4, 000 $ 12, 000 $ 4, 700 $ 14, 100

14. 16" Valve 1 EA $ 8, 500 8, 500 $ 9, 800 9, 800

15. 18" Valve 4 EA $ 14, 000 $ 56, 000 $ 16, 200 $ 64, 800

16. 20" Valve 1 EA $ 18, 000 $ 18, 000 $ 20, 800 $ 20, 800

17. 48" Valve 1 EA $ 85, 000 $ 85, 000 $ 98, 000 $ 98, 000

18. Encroachment Removal 31 EA $ 10, 000 $ 310, 000 $ 11, 600 $ 359, 600

19. Encroachment Modification 3 EA $ 100, 000 $ 300, 000 $ 115, 300 $ 345, 900

20. Hydroseeding 1, 390, 400 SF 0. 10 $ 139, 100 0. 12 $ 166, 900 Mana ement/ Environmental/ Engineering 3,348, 700 3, 970, 500

1. Administration 5% $ 418, 600 5% $ 496, 300

2. Planning 3% $ 251, 200 3% $ 297, 800

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 418, 600 5% $ 496, 300

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2°/ o $ 167, 500 2% $ 198, 600

5. Surve r i and Civil Engineering 10% $ 837, 100 10% $ 992, 600

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 1, 004, 500 12°/a $ 1, 191, 100

7. Mitigation 3% $ 251, 200 3% $ 297, 800
Real Estate 515 300- 595100

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 8. 6 AC $ 25, 000 $ 215, 300 $ 28, 900 $ 248, 900

2. Easement Ac uisition 6 EA $ 50, 000 $ 300, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 346, 200 Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 8 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 19
271

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction 3,68$, 200 4,566, 900

1. Mobilization 10% $ 326, 400 10% $ 404, 200

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 98, 000 3% $ 121, 300

3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height) 17, 400 CY 10 $ 174, 000 12 $ 208, 800

4. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall 306, 400 SF 8 $ 2, 451, 200 10 $ 3, 064, 000

5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle) 6, 700 CY 10 $ 67, 000 12 $ 80, 400

6. Imported Engineered Fill 37, 600 TN 15 $ 564, 000 18 $ 676, 800

7. Tracer Wire 3, 800 LF 2 7, 600 3 $ 11, 400
Management/ Environmental/ Engineering 1, 475, 700 1, 827, 200

1. Administration 5°/ o $ 184, 500 5% $ 228, 400

2. Planning 3°/ o $ 110, 700 3% $ 137, 100

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 184, 500 5% $ 228, 400

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 73, 800 2% $ 91, 400

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 368, 900 10% $ 456, 700

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 442, 600 12% $ 548, 100

7. Mitigation 3% $ 110, 700 3% $ 137, 100
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
i
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 9 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 20
272

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
i
Construction ' 1, 785, 900' 2,211, 200

1. Mobilization 10% $ 158, 100 10% $ 195, 700

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 47, 500 3% $ 58, 800

3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height) 8, 500 CY 10 $ 85, 000 12 $ 102, 000

4. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall 148, 000 SF 8 $ 1, 184, 000 10 $ 1, 480, 000

5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle) 3, 300 CY 10 $ 33, 000 12 $ 39, 600

6. Imported Engineered Fill 18, 300 TN 15 $ 274, 500 18 $ 329, 400

7. Tracer Wire 1, 900 LF 2 3, 800 3 5, 700
Management/ Environmental/ Engineering 714, 600- 884, 900

1. Administration 5% $ 89, 300 5% $ 110, 600

2. Planning 3% $ 53, 600 3% $ 66,400

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 89, 300 5% $ 110, 600

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 35, 800 2% $ 44, 300

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 178, 600 10% $ 221, 200

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 214, 400 12% $ 265, 400

7. Mitigation 3°/ a $ 53,600 3% $ 66, 400
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 10 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 21
273

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
i
Construction '` 969, 000' 1, 154, 700

1. Mobilization 3% $ 27, 500 3% $ 32, 700

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 27, 500 3% $ 32, 700

3. Clearing and Grubbing 5. 3 AC $ 2, 000 $ 10, 600 $ 2, 400 $ 12, 800

4. Imported Engineered Fill 47, 600 TN 15 $ 714, 000 18 $ 856, 800

5. Class 2 Aggregate Base 2, 300 TN 25 $ 57, 500 29 $ 66, 700

6. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe 1 EA $ 95, 000 $ 95, 000 $ 109, 500 $ 109, 500

7. Air Release Valve 1 EA $ 2, 000 2, 000 $ 2, 400 2, 400

8. 20" Valve 1 EA $ 18, 000 $ 18, 000 $ 20, 800 $ 20, 800

9. Hydroseeding 168, 900 SF 0. 10 $ 16, 900 0. 12 $ 20, 300 Mangementl Environmental! Engineering 387, 800; 462, 200

1. Administration 5% $ 48, 500 5% $ 57, 800

2. Planning 3% $ 29, 100 3% $ 34, 700

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 48, 500 5% $ 57, 800

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 19, 400 2% $ 23, 100

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 96, 900 10% $ 115, 500

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 116, 300 12% $ 138, 600

7. Mitigation 3% $ 29, 100 3% $ 34, 700
Real Estate 0 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
pu,
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 11 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 22
274

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction ' 18, 810, 800 22, 234,400

1. Mobilization 3% $ 532, 400 3% $ 629, 300

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 532, 400 3% $ 629, 300

3. Traffic Control 1 LS $ 50, 000 $ 50, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 57, 700

4. AC Pavement Repairs 20, 000 SF 10 $ 200, 000 12 $ 240, 000

5. Clearing and Grubbing 50. 9 AC $ 2, 000 $ 101, 800 $ 2, 400 $ 122, 200

6. Imported Engineered Fill 569, 900 TN 15 $ 8, 548, 500 18 $ 10, 258, 200

7. Drain Rock Material 170, 400 TN 30 $ 5, 112, 000 35 $ 5, 964, 000

8. Sand Filter Material 79, 800 TN 25 $ 1, 995, 000 29 $ 2, 314, 200

9. Filter Fabric 928, 400 SF 0. 50 $ 464, 200 0. 58 $ 538, 500

10. Class 2 Aggregate Base 15, 700 TN 25 $ 392, 500 29 $ 455, 300

11. Encroachment Modification 1 EA $ 100, 000 $ 100, 000 $ 115, 300 $ 115, 300

12. Hydroseeding 1, 519, 200 SF 0. 10 $ 152, 000 0. 12 $ 182, 400

13. Quarry Stone Riprap 14, 000 TN 45 $ 630, 000 52 $ 728, 000 Mangemenf/ Environmental/ Engineering T,524, 700 8, 894, 200

1. Administration 5% $ 940, 600 5% $ 1, 111, 800

2. Planning 3% $ 564, 400 3% $ 667, 100

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 940, 600 5% $ 1, 111, 800

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 376, 300 2% $ 444, 700

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 1, 881, 100 10% $ 2, 223, 500

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 2, 257, 300 12% $ 2, 668, 200

7. Mitigation 3% $ 564, 400 3% $ 667, 100
Reai Estate 735, 000 849, 200

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 19. 4 AC $ 25, 000 $ 485, 000 $ 28, 900 $ 560, 700

2. Easement Ac uisition 5 EA $ 50, 000 $ 250, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 288, 500 Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 12 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 23
275

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Construction ` 5, 586, 200 6,458, 400

1. Mobilization 3% $ 158, 100 3% $ 182, 800

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 158, 100 3% $ 182, 800

3. Clearing and Grubbing 34. 0 AC $ 2, 000 $ 68, 000 $ 2, 400 $ 81, 600

4. Quarry Stone Riprap 115, 600 TN 45 $ 5, 202, 000 52 $ 6, 011, 200 Mangement'/ Environmental'/ Engineering 2, 234, 900' 2, 583, 800

1. Administration 5% $ 279, 400 5% $ 323, 000

2. Planning 3% $ 167, 600 3% $ 193, 800

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 279, 400 5% $ 323, 000

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 111, 800 2% $ 129, 200

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 558, 700 10% $ 645, 900

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 670, 400 12% $ 775, 100

7. Mitigation 3% $ 167, 600 3% $ 193, 800
Real Estate 0 ' 0

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 0. 0 AC $ 25, 000 0 $ 28, 900 0

2. Easement Ac uisition 0 EA $ 50, 000 0 $ 57, 700 0
i
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 13 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 24
276

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
s
Real Estate 10, 3 7,500 11, 903, 200

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 40. 7 AC $ 25, 000 $ 1, 017, 500 $ 28, 900 $ 1, 176, 300

2. Land Valuation ( Residential) 3. 0 AC $ 250, 000 $ 750, 000 $ 288, 100 $ 864, 300

3. Land Valuation ( Commercial) 1. 0 AC $ 250, 000 $ 250, 000 $ 288, 100 $ 288, 100

4. Improvement Valuation ( Residential) 15 EA $ 150, 000 $ 2, 250, 000 $ 172, 900 $ 2, 593, 500

5. Easement Acquisition 113 EA $ 50, 000 $ 5, 650, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 6, 520, 100

6. Easement Ac uisition Oak Shores) 1 EA $ 400, 000 $ 400, 000 $ 460, 900 $ 460, 900 Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 14 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 25
277

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS

DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
i • -
Construction ' 23, 983,300: 28, 501, 800

1. Mobilization 3% $ 678, 800 3% $ 806, 700

2. Erosion Control 3% $ 678, 800 3% $ 806, 700

3. Traffic Control 1 LS $ 120, 000 $ 120, 000 $ 138, 300 $ 138, 300

4. AC Pavement Repairs 70, 000 SF 10 $ 700, 000 12 $ 840, 000

5. Clearing and Grubbing 80. 8 AC $ 5, 000 $ 404, 200 $ 5, 800 $ 468, 900

6. Excavate Levee Keyway 38, 800 CY 10 $ 388, 000 12 $ 465, 600

7. Imported Engineered Fill 958, 800 TN 15 $ 14, 382, 000 18 $ 17, 258, 400

8. Drain Rock Material 110, 100 TN 30 $ 3, 303, 000 35 $ 3, 853, 500

9. Sand Filter Material 33, 100 TN 25 $ 827, 500 29 $ 959, 900

10. Filter Fabric 742, 500 SF 0. 50 $ 371, 300 0. 58 $ 430, 700

11. Class 2 Aggregate Base 10, 800 TN 25 $ 270, 000 29 $ 313, 200

12. Encroachment Removal 2 EA $ 50, 000 $ 100, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 115, 400

13. Encroachment Modification 3 EA $ 100, 000 $ 300, 000 $ 115, 300 $ 345, 900

14. Relocate Ditch 9, 100 LF 10 $ 91, 000 12 $ 109, 200

15. Hydroseeding 1, 761, 100 SF 0. 10 $ 176, 200 0. 12 $ 211, 400

16. Quarry Stone Riprap 26, 500 TN 45 $ 1, 192, 500 52 $ 1, 378, 000 Managemenf/ fnvironmentall Engineering 9,593, 500 11, 401, 000

1. Administration 5% $ 1, 199, 200 5% $ 1, 425, 100

2. Planning 3% $ 719, 500 3% $ 855, 100

3. Environmental and Permitting 5% $ 1, 199, 200 5% $ 1, 425, 100

4. Geotechnical Engineering 2% $ 479, 700 2% $ 570, 100

5. Surveying and Civil Engineering 10% $ 2, 398, 400 10% $ 2, 850, 200

6. Construction Management and Inspection 12% $ 2, 878, 000 12% $ 3, 420, 300

7. Mitigation 3% $ 719, 500 3% $ 855, 100
Real Estate 3,167, 500' 3,659, 500

1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural) 82. 7 AC $ 25, 000 $ 2, 067, 500 $ 28, 900 $ 2, 390, 100

2. EasementAc uisition 22 EA $ 50, 000 $ 1, 100, 000 $ 57, 700 $ 1, 269, 400 n
r
i• i
Kjeldsen, Sinnock& Neudeck, Inc. Page 15 of 15 Print Date: 1/ 29/ 2021 A- 26
278
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX 6:

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROLAGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 22- 07:

RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH THE MEMBER LAND USE

AGENCIES TO FINALIZE THE MOSSDALE TRACT URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD

PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UPDATE AND AUTHORIZING THE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED COLLECTION AGREEMENT

EXCLUDING THE FINAL NEXUS STUDY UPDATE)

AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD

CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVEL OF

PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ( PARTIAL EXECUTION COPY)

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM SUPPORTING TABLES
Reso 22- 07 SJAFCA Resolution Adopting Regional Impact Fee Program ................................... 61 Agmt Amended Collection Agreement for Regional Impact Fee...................................... 63 Table B1 Development Fee Summary.................................................................................... 620 Table B2 Total Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate ................................................. B21 Table 63 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Single Family.................................. 622 Table B4 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate— Multifamily.................................... B23 Table B5 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate— Commercial ................................... B24 Table 66 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate— Industrial ....................................... 625 Table 67 Creditable Pre- Project Expenditures ....................................................................... B26 LWA

LARSEN WURZEI
45SOCipt25,{ nt. 1801014 Adequa[ e Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 0118. docx 279

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. SJAFCA 22- 07

SAN JOAQUIN AREA

FLOOD CONTRQL AGENCY
RESOLUTION DlRECTING STAFF TO W RK WITH THE IVIEMBER LAND USE AGENCIES TO FINALIZE THE MOSSDAI. E TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN

LEVEL OF FLD D PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UDPATE AND

AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED

COLLECTION AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, in Navember 2018 the SJAFCA Board of Direc#ors approved the Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Ffood Protection Development Impact Fee Program impact Fee Program"} Nexus Study and authorized the executian of a collectian agreement for said program with its member land use agencies; and WHEREAS, since the approval of the Impact Fee Pragram Nexus Study, several key factors reflected in the Nexus have changed including changes to the overall costs of the levee improvement program, the approach to financing the impravements and projections of development upon which the Nexus Study apportions the cost necessitating and update to the Nexus Study and associated collection agreement; and WHEREAS, SJAFCA naw desires to work vith its member Land Use Agencies to implement an update to the Impact Fee Program.

NOW THEREF RE BE IT RESOL VED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JDAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The SJAFCA Board of Directors hereby directs staff to work with fihe member Land Use Agencies to finalize for adoption by the member land use agencies the Draft Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Nexus Sfiudy Update Dated February 23, 2022 attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

2. The De elopment Fee will be collected by the Land Use Agencies in accordance with an Amended Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Con#rol Agency Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee. The Board authorizes the Executive Director, after consultation with Agency Counsel, to execute a coilection agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March 2022.

SJAFCA Resolution 22- 07

Page 1 of 2 ends

B- 1
280

ATTACHMENT A
DAN WRI HT, Chair
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
ATTEST:

CHRIS ELIAS, Secretary
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency

APPROVED AS TO F
S O L. O, al Counsel
f e S n Joa Area
Flood ntrol Agen y
SJAFCA Resalution 22- 07

Page 2 of 2 ends

B- 2
281
Exhibit 2
AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR G L. LECTION OF

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY

MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVE OF

FLOOD PROTECTION DEVELCIPMENT IMPACT FEE
This Agreement for Coflection of San Joaquin Area Flood Contro! Agency Mossda[e Tract Area Regional Urban Levei of Fload Protecfian Development Impact Fee(" Agreement°) is made and entered info on the date it is effective pursuant to Section 12 by and among the fol(owing parties:
a. Cify of Stocktan, hereinafter refeRed to as " Stocktan"; b. Counfy of San Joaquin, hereinaf#er referred to as" County'; c. City of Lathrop, hereinafter referred to as" Lathrop;" d. City of Manteca, hereinafter referred ta as " Manteca;° and, e. The San Joaquin Area Flood Contra! Agency, herein referred to as SJAFCA."
A signatory fo this Agreement is referred to herein as a Party, and collectively each Party is eferred to as the Parties.

REC(TALS
WHEREAS, in January of 2018, Stockton, the Counfy, the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(" SJCFCWCD"), Lathrap, and Manteca executed an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement(" JEPA") to reform the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency(" Agency") with a common goal of expanding the Agency to allow a coordinated effort to reduce flood risk in fhe Mossdale Tract Area ( the Rrogram").

S' g°' Page I of I3
AMEDIDED Agrcement for Collection of San Ioaquin Area Flood Control Agency Devetopment lmpad Fee
B- 3
282
WHEREAS, SJAFCA, through certain state Eegislation and through fhe execution of the Amended and Restated Jaint Exercise of Powers Agreement, has legal authority to prescribe, revise and collect fees as a condition of development of land ( JEPA Section 7. m) for the purpose of assisting in the financ[ng of flood cantrol facilities, inciuding the authority to make such fees applicable to development af land within the Cauniy, Stockfon, Lathrop, and Manteca ( collecfively, " the Land Use Agencies"}.

WHEREAS, SJAFCA exercised this autharity for the purpose af assisting in fhe financing af levee improvements and related flood risk reduction measures necessary to provide at least a 200- year level of f(aoci pratecfion to ( ands vriithin the 2q0- year floodplain along the San Joaquin River in the Massdate TractArea ( uProgram Area") and to thereby offset fhe increase in damageable property that is pfaced in fhe tevee protected floodplain as new deve(opment occurs in fhis area.

WHEREAS, SJAFCA prepared a Mossdale TractArea Regional Urba Level of Fload Protection Development Impact Fee Nexus Study(" Nexus Study") dated November 8, 2018 that described and determined fhe applicable Mossdale T act Area Regianaf Urban Level of Flood Protectian Development Impact Fee(" DIF").

WHEREAS, SJAFCA has now prepared an updated Nexus Study, dated Felaruary 23, 2022, that again describes and determines an updated DIF.

WHEREAS, each of fhe Parties has adopted or wil! adopt the u adated Nexus Study which creates an updated DIF for the Program Area.

WHEREAS, SJAFCA has requesfed thaf the Land Use Agencies, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for new development in the Program Area, as shown on Figure 1 in the Nexus Study, thaf is within each of the Land Use Agency' s land use authority, collect and transmit to SJAFCA the updated DIF for the development project for which such building permit is to be issued.

UVHEREAS, the Land Use Agencies are willing and desire to coliect the DlF and to fransmit the D(F to SJAFCA, and the Land Use Ageneies and SJAFCA desire to set forth the standards applicable to the collection ofthe DIF.

Page 2 of 13 ends

AMENDED Agrecment for Collecdon ofSan Joaquin Area Flood Catttrol Agency Devetopment Impact Fee
B- 4
283

COVENANTS
In consideration af the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Pafies hereta agree as follows:

1. Incamoratian of Recitals. The above recitals are incarporated in this Agreement by reference.

2. Co(lectian and Transmission of DIF. Commencing wifh fhe effective date of the updated DlF, the Land Use Agencies shal! collect the updated D! F as a condition of issuance of a building permit for any building, for which a building permit is required, located in the Pragram Area. The Land Use Agencies shall transmit ta SJAFCA all amounts of the DIF that have been coltected, minus the hoid- back processing fee for the Land Use Agencies adopted pursuant to the Nexus Study. TF e methodology far computing the DIF, togetherwith other procedural criteria, are specified in the Nexus Study.

3. Deposi of DIF. SJAFCA shall maintain a separate capital facilities accounf into which the Land Use Agencies shafl, at least quarterly, deposit the DIF funds collected by the Land Use Agencies. Any interest earned on the DIF whife held by the Land Use Agency shall a[so be deposited by fhe Land Use Agency.

4. Periodic Update of the DIF. SJAFCA shall pramptty nofify the Land Use Agencies of any necessary adjustments to the DIF to be made by the Parties from time to time.

5. Application of Fee Creditinq and Reimbursement Policies. The Parties agree that in order to have a fair application of this Agreement, the DIF and fhe funds if will generate wifhin each Land Use Agency, it is necessary to agree to principles which will be applied by any Land Use Agency when certain conditions occur. In such cases, the Land Use Agencies agree to apply the principles contained in Exhibit B to Collection Agreement. The relevant conditions are as follows:
rrs:, Page 3 of 13
AIV1ENllED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin AreaFlood Controt Ageaey Develapment lmpact Fee
B- 5
284
a. The Land Use Aqencv has previously col(ected funds pursuant to a funding agreement with a develaper in advance of when the fee would ofherwise be due pursuant to the DIF Resolution and the funds are to be used to pian, design, andlar construct a portion of fhe Program; or,
b. The Land Use Aqency has entered into an agreement with a developer ta p(an, design and/ or cor struction a portion of the Program; or,
c. The Land Use Aqency itse(f has funded fhe planning, design and/or construction a portion of the Program.

6. Refunds. In the event that a Land Use Agency caflects the DIF or a portion of fhe DtF in error, the Land Use Agency will recaiculate the coITect DIF amount, process a refund to the customer, if necessary, and notify SJAFCA af fhis action.

SJAFCA shaif pramptly refund any amount due to the Land Use Agency as a result of such error, or upon request of the Land Use Agency shal! work with the Land Use Agency ta tnte-up amounfs owing in conjunction with the Land Use Agency forwarding future DfFs. ! n the event that a Land Use Agency requests that SJAFCA process a refund due to a buiiding permit expiring without construction faking p(ace, SJAFCA sha(! prompfly process such refund ta the Land Use Agency minus any costs incurred by SJAFCA in processing such refund.

7. Payment of DIF under Protest. Pursuant to Tiffe 7, Division 1, Chapter 9 of fhe Ga(ifornia Government Code, commencing with § 66020, any aggrieved landowner shaU be entitled to pay the applica6le DIF to a Land Use Agency under profest. The protest pracedures set forth therein shall apply fo the DIF paid under protest.

S. A eal. SJAFCA' s Board of Directors shaU hear alf appeals for waiver or reduction in SJAFCA' s DIF. The Board of Directors may adopt such policies as it wishes for fhe pracessing of the appeal and sha( I have the sole authorfty to grant or deny the 538 Page 4 of 13
AMENDED Agreementfor Collection afSan Joaquin AreaFlood Controt Agency Develogment Impact Fee
B- 6
285
appea(. Within 5 business days foliowing the finaE action of ifs Board of Directo s regarding an appeal, SJAFCA shal[ notify the affecfed Land Use Agency in wrifing of its determination.

9. Compensafion of Land Use A ecLncies. In consideration for collecting the DIF and cohsistent wifh fhe hold- back provided for in Section 2, SJAFCA shall reimburse the Land Use Agencies for their cast of time and materials for calculating, reporting, coliecting, ancf processing functians. Such casts shall inc(ude the time and materials expended by, but not[ imited to, empioyees af the relevant Community Services Department, the Auditor- Control( er' s department, the Land Use Agencies' administrative office, and the informafion technalogy department. The Parties agree that a charge of 3% of the DIF is a reasanable estimate of the Land Use Agencies' cost of time and materials for caiculating, reporting, callecting, and processing of fhe DIF.

Each Land Use Agency and SJAFGA rrtay agrea to a difFerent amount thaf reflects the Land Use Agency's actual cost of collection by executing a letter agreement wifhout the need to amend this Agreement.

10. Relafionship to Enhanced Infrastructure Financina District.

The Parties acknowledge that as a separate action, the Land Use Agencies are also coflaborating on the creation of an enhanced infrastructure financing district(" EIFD"j which will collect funds from a partion of property taxes paid in the Program Area to also fund, in addition to fhe D( F, levee improvements protecting the Pragram Area. Far the EIFD, the Land Use Agencies have agreed that the County will contribute a larger share of EfFD payments for an initial period, in exchange for the County receiving priority repayment of some of those funds fram fhe D[ F collecfed under this Agreement.

Aftached hereto as Exhibit A are the key terms showing the mechanism of such prior ty repayment and each af the Land Use Entities agrees to such priority repayment.

11. Indemnification.
a. Except as provided in Secfion 11. b., SJAFCA agrees to indemnify, ho(d harmless and defend the Land Use Agencies, their Board of Supervisors or Cify ms aY Page 5 of l3
AMErIDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Ftood Controt Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 7
286
Counci(, officers, directors, agents and employees from and against any and ail demands, liabilities, claims, ac#ions, costs, damages, losses, litigation oc expenses including aftorney's fees} arising out of or in any way related to, directly or indirectly, any action taken by the Land Use Agencies to collect fhe DIF and/or their performance of fhe obligafions of this Agreement. This indemnification shal( extend and apply to any claim, demand, ar litigation pertaining to the lawfu( ness or validity of the SJAFCA DIF. b. Each Land Use Agency agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend SJAFCA, ifs Board af Director, officers, agents and emplayees from anci against any and all demands, liabili ies, claims, actions, cosfs, damages, (asses, litigatian or expenses (incfuding attomey's fees) arising out of or in any way related to, directiy ar indirectly, any criminal, reckless, or wrongfui action taken by the Land Use Agency or its employees in the collecfian or processing of the DIF.

12. Notices. Notice to be provided to any ParEy to this Agreement arising out of mafters pertaining to this Agreemenf shall be addressed as follows:

For County and SJCFCWGD:

San Joaquin County Department of Public Warks
ATTN: Public Works Director
P. O. Box 1810
Stackton, California 95201
For City of Lathrop:

City of L.a#hrop
ATTN: Teresa Vargas, City Clerk
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lafhrop, CA 95330
For City of Manteca:

City of Manteca
ATTN: Cify Clerk

Page 6 of 13 ends

AMEAIDED Agreem t far Collection of San Joaquin AreaFEood Control Agency Bevelopment Impact Fee
B- 8
287
1001 W. Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
For City of Sfockton:

City of Stocktan Community Development Deparfinent
ATTN: Communify Development Director
424 N. EI Dorado Street
Sfocktan, CA 95202
Any party may change the address to which subsequent natice and/ or ather cammunicatians can be sent by giving wriften notice designating a change of address to the other Parties, which shalf be effective upan receipt.

13. Term. This Agreement shail be effective as to SJAFCA and any Land Use Agency, once SJAFCA and the Land Use Agency bath execute this Agreement and also adapt the DIF, and shall be effective as to each additional Land Use Agency once this Agreement s executed by that Land Use Agency and the D! F is adopted, and shall end when either( i) SJAFCA ferminates the Agreemenf in accordance wifh Section 14, or( ii) all adapting Land Use Agencies have terminated the Agreement in accordance with Section 14.

14. Withdrawal from Aqreement. Any Land Use Agency fhat has executed this Agreerrtent, or SJAFCA, may wifhdraw from this Agreement by giving the other Parties at least six ( 6) months written nofice of withdrawai. ! n the event of withdrawal by a Land Use Agency, tFtat Land Use Agency shall, within 10 days of effec6ve withdrawa[, cause fo be depasited inta SJAFCA's separate capital facilities accaunt all DIF funds coilected prior ta withdrawaf.

15. Modifications. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties and no alterafion, amendmenf, variation, or waiver of the fem ts of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by all Par ies. Waiver by any Party of any default, breach ar condition precedent shall nof be construed as a waiver of any ofher defauit, breach or condition precedent, or any othe right hereunder.

T, rnavl Page 7 of 13
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Controf Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 9
288

16. GoveminQ Laws and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed and to be performed within the State of California and shall be construed and govemed by the infernal laws of fhe State of Ca[ ifornia. Any legai p oceedings arising out of or relating fo this Agreement shalt be brought in the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, California.

17. Assignment; Binding on Successors. The righfs and duties of the Parties may not be assigned or delegated withaut the written cansent of all other Parties. Any aftempf to assign or delegate such righfs or duties in contravention of this Agreement shall be null and vaid. This Agreemen# shall be binding upon and shall inure to fhe benefit of the successors of the Parties hereto, respectively. Any approved assignment or delegation shall be consistent with the terms of any confracts, resolutions, indemnifies and ofiher obligations of the Agency then in effect. 9 8. ( nterpretafion. This Agreemen# shall be deemed to have been prepared equally by al! of the Parties, and the Agreement and its individual provisions shall not be construed or interpreted more favorab(y for one Party on the basis that another Party prepared it.

19. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire contract between Ehe Parties egarding the collection, deposit, and eporting af the DIF. Any prior agreements, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby terminated effecfive immediately upon full execution ofthis Agreement.

20. Severabilitv. Should any part, term or provision of this Agreement be decided by any courf of compefent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any faw of the State of California, or othenivise be rendered unenfarceable or ineffectual, the validity af the remaining portions or provisions sha(I not be affected thereby.

21. Duplicate Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts. The Agreement shall be deemed executed when it has been signed by SJAFCA and at feast one of the Land Use Agencies.

T 1 Page 8 of 13
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San 7oaquin Area Flood Coniro I Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 10
289

22. Interpretation. For purposes ofthis Agreement, eferences to "he" shalt mean and include" she," references fo" him" shall mean and include" her," and references to" hisn shali mean and include" hers."
IN WITNESS WHERE F, the Parties herefa have caused this Agreement to be executed an the day and year first above- written.

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN CITY OF STOCKTON,
a political subdivision of the State of Ca(ifornia a municipa( Corporation ti
By:
er me Wilverding
C unfy Administrarar
ATTEST: ATTEST:

C(erk of the Baard af Supervisors Cterk of fhe City of Stockton of the Counfy f San Joaquin,
State of California
By: By:

RACH LDeBORD
Deputy Clerk
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: APPROVED AS TO ORM
By- ,,, BY:

FR B CHMAN, C, E. T.E., CFM
Interim Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

F
G` By:

Mafthew Dacey
Deputy County Counse(
t Page 9 of I3
AMENDED Agreement for Collection ofSan 7oaqain Araa Flnod Cantrol Agency Devetopment Impact Pee
B- 11
290
CTfY OF LATHROP, CTTY( F MANTECA,
a mur icipal Corporation a municipat Corporatian
B By:
en J. Salvatare
City Managcr Tide:

ATTEST: ATTEST:

Clerk af the City of Lathrop Clerk of the City of Manteca By:
l ,,/
By:
a Vargas
ity Clerk Title:

APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPR4VED AS TO FORM:

BY B Y
Sulvadar Navarrete
City Attorney Title:

SAN JOAQUIN AREA FL(30D CONTROL APPROVED AS TQ FORM:

AGENCY
i
By: By:
r
CHRIS ELiAS SCOTT L. SHAPIRO
Executive Director Agency Caunsel
ims xvi Puge 10 of l3
AMENDED Agreement for Collectian of Sun laaquia Aiea Ftood Control Agency Developmcnt Impact Fa
B- 12
291
C17Y Q t.. THRUP, CITY OF MANTECA,
a municipat Corporation a municipal orporation
By: By:

Title: Title: l.' V' in''` C N'
ATl"EST AT7'E T:

C(erk o€the! City qf l,#htop Cle k ofthe City of Manteea By:

APPRSJVEQ kS TO ORM: APPROVEQ AS T4 FORM:
y: y: `^
Titte: Title: i'- ' d.•.

SAN JOAQUtN AREp, FLL?OD CONI` ROL APPf2QVED AS TO FORM:

AG.ENCY
By= gy:

CHRl E IA SCC TT L. SHAPfRO
Execufive Dir eefor 4gency Counsel
Tn Page 14 of 23
AMENDED Agracmentfor Coll tion oF an Joaquin Ar e Ftood Gontro! Agen y Iieyelopirient ImpactFce
B- 13 , _... _.
292

EXHIBIT A

SAN OAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGfONAL URBAN LEVEL JF

FIOOD PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Key Terms Related to the Repayment of
EIFD Payments ta Land Use Entities fram fmpact Fees

1. Deve(opment Impact Fees" Impact Fees" collected after the lnitial Years( ending in 2029), wouid be paid to each jurisdiction to heip affset the general fund impacts associated with debt service requiremenfs of the EIFD, subject first to priorify reimbursement of" Cour ty Additional EIFD Contributi ns," as defined below. ( i. e., the fmpacf Fees would 6e directly paid to the Counfy until they have fully repaid the cumulative County Additional EIFD Contributions. After that repaymenf, Impact Fees would be used to offset the agencies' impacts fo their respective general funds from prior EIFD property tax allocations, the" Impact Fee Offset," as further described below).

2. Durinq the Inifial Years, the fo{lowing EIFD funding participafion is proposed:
a) San Joaquin Caur y proposed to contribute a total flat rate of 47°!0 of property tax increment, comprised of its Initial Base Rate plus an additional 37% of property tax increment, with such additional amount defined as° County Additional EtFD Canfribution".
b} Cities wi(I each provide their respective Initial Base Rates.

3. FofEawinc the Initial Years, the follawing EIFD Funding participation and other financial arrangements are proposed:
a) The fnitial Base Rates would no longer apply and all agencies, including the County, would provide proportional EIFD contributions ( i. e., the same percentage rate of fofal tax increment) to meet the debt service needs of any debt issued and secured by EIFD revenues subject to the Maximum Rate 2Q%) of total property fax increment. The contributions provided after the Initial Years would be subject to the Ma cimum Rate are defined as the" Post Projecf Annua( Contribution."
b) The cumulative County Additional EIFD Contribution shall be repaid to the County using Impact Fees. County to receive 100% of Impact Fees until the cumulative Additional County EIFD Contribution is repaid wifh interest compounded quarterly on at the annual County Pooled Treasury Rate for that quarter plus 200 basis points.
m, Page 11 of 13
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San 7aaquin Area F[ ood Conhnl Agency Deve(opment Impact Fee
B- 14
293
c) Following retirement of the cumulafive County Additional ElFD Contribution with interest from Impact Fees, the impact Fee Offset would be implemented as follows. Alf Impact Fees received by SJAFCA after repayment fo the County would be allocated and paid to the Cities and the County to offset prior general fund impacts of previous EIFD contributions. The propartionate share of the cumulative tofal of each participating agency' s tnitial Contribufions and Past Project Annual ContriButions are defined as each agency' s° Base EIFD Share." DtF revenues would be paid fa each Agency based on ifs Base EIFD Share.
d) The duration ( i. e., term) of tmpact Fee Offset payments is yet to be determined. The term will be finalized during the process of updafing the SJAFCA Mossdale ULOP Program lmpacf Fee Nexus Study. As part of the mpac# Fee Update process, the MemberAgencies will have an opportunity fo weigh in on duration of the impact fee prvgram.

Tm'°' Page 12 of 13
AMENDED Agreement for Collectiou of San Joaquin Area Flood Co ol Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 15
294

EXHIBIT B
FEE CREDITfNG PRINCIPLES
s g Page 13 of I3
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaqnin Area Flood Conho( Ageucy Development Impact Fee
B- 16
295

XHIBIT B
SAN. lOA4UIN AREA F1.00D CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSQAL.E TRACTAR A REGIONAL URBAN LEVEI. OF FLOOD PROTECTION Etl l( 7E F t E-C t`-$ c I[- I Ig 1f2sE• JI 1 RON C-I
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTtONS
The fa[lowing are the nnder(yfng assumptions that predicate the establishment of credits and reim6urserc ents:

All funding, in- kind servtces, or constructlon offaciEities in furtherance of providing an Urban Level of Flood Pratection to Mossdate Tract Area, NPrior Advance Funding,p was provIded tn advance ofthe Reclamation District 171nterim Levee lmpact Fee( lnterim levee Fee) and San Joaquin Area Elaod Catttrof Agency( SIA CA) Regiona) Levee Fee( Regtona) DiF)( collectfvely, the levee Fee) on behal af develapment projects wtll be identiffed bythe tables( n a" Credit& ReimhursemerYt Aaa( ysis," to be prepared bySlAFCA.

All Prior Advance Funding of the Eevee Fee will be proportianatety allocable to the individuat tract maps/ phasesjunEts/ villages in proJects based unon a project' s gross developable acreage.

Development within a project is assumed to have an obligafion to fttnd levee[ mprovements for a1[ undeve( oped gross devefopable acreage as of April 7, 2017 in Lathrop and Aprii 22, 20171n Manteca, the efFective dates of the lnterim Fees adopted by lathrop and Manteca, Units withtn a project are assumed to have been previously absorbed if a permit for the unit has been apptted for before lanuary 8, 2019, the effective date of SIAFCA`s Regtonat p1.

The Levee Fee obiigation for aft remaining developable acreage in a proJect absorbed before Ianuary S, 2019 are the tnitia) Fee Rates as identified in the November 8, 2018, Mossdate Tract Area Reglonal Urban Level of F[ ood Pratection Levee I i npact Fee Ne n.ts Study as adopted by SlAFCA Reso[ ution= 18 on Novem6er 8, 2Q18( reference Table 1 of that Nexus Study}. 7{ e credit for Prtor Advance Fund) ng will6e expressed in terms of 6DAs and will be determined by taking the amount of pdor advance funding and dividtng it 6y the inftial Fee Rates per GDA. The amount of 6DA credit will be set by thfs methodalogy and will not be recalculated in the future by the escatating fee rate.

All permits that have prevtously been applled for befo e lanuary 8, 2019,( i. e., ahsor6edj are assumed to have been fufty funded wtth credit from prior advance funding and no additionaf Levee Fees will be requ3red to lae patd for these units.
t For multiple projects that are heing devetoped by a cammon landowner, ff one project Is determined to have advance funded levee ees in excess of its obligation and is due a reimbursement, the reimbursement will be applied and added to the credit of the next project cun-ently unde uray with the consent of the( andowner.
r` P' r`reytw,
october22, zo18
B- 17
296
CREDIT( N6 POLlCY FOR PRIO i AbVAIVC FUNDING
The Credtting Poficy witl allow fortheuse ofthe accumulated credft on a propor iaitate basis as the remalnder of a project fs develaped. The basis for the proportlonality wfill be tEte ratio of Rematning Credit Acreage ta Total Remaining Acres to be developed.

Remainin Credit Acrea e' will be defined as the credit a cun ulated bythe prior advance funding less the amaunt nf credit utilfzed by units that have been absorbed pripr ta lanuary 8, 2019. fotal Remainin Acres" to be developed wifl be defined as the difference between the tofial developa6te GDAs In a projecc and the amount of acres absorbed hefnre lanuary 9, 20I9, or as subsequently revised bythe Land Use Agency and the[. andowmer.

Use ef Prior A vance unding Credit
As homes and/ or prnjects are canstructed by permits applied for after lanuary 9, 2019, the lan[ owner will fund a portion of the Levee Fee based on the reiative propofionality hetween tEre rematnder of a project not abEe to be funded from the Rema ning Credlt Acreage and the Tota! Remaining Acres left in the project after af! previous( y absorbed units.
7a lrriplement ttt(s poAcy, the Land Use Agency wilt catcutate this remaining amount af the Levee Fee due as the Indlvtdua! building permits are fssued for units to he constructed In fihe proJect. Collectlon af the levee Fee can be deferred consfstent with any adopted fee deferral program by the Land Use agertcy.

CREpITtNG POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FAUCfTIES
Any Deve( oper constructed facilittes wii( be constructed pursuant to an agreement entered into between ihe Land Use Agency and SIAFCA. TFte agreement wllf specify the maximum amaunt af creditthat wifE be afforded for the canstruction of the facility which wti! be tf e tesser of the estimated cost of the facility which j was the basls for the deuelopment fee program or the beve[oper's acival construction cost j"Canstructed Eacilities unding Credi'}, Constructed Facilities Funding Credlt wiI! 6e documented and provided when a completed facifity is accepted by the appropriate entity.

Use of ConstrucYed Facilities Fundtng Credit
Use of Constructed Faciitk(es Funding Credit wi(I be consistent with the" Use of Advance Funding Credit" described above.

REIMBURSEMENT POL[ CY FOR PRIOR ADVANCE FUNDING
For Devetopment ProJects due a reimbursement as a result of funding in excess of a Peo ect`s i,evee tmpact Eee flbltgation
Tha reimhursement policy wili be conslstent with the faliowing underlying principles.

Reimbursements wilf be only be paid from tevee impact fees collected from other devafopment projecrs,
No reim6ursements shauld be paid to a party advancing funds Into the fevee improvement pragram until afl tevee impravement project costs are paid and the( evee improvement• pregram has been compEeted and certtfied, un(ess otherwise determined by SIAFCA that paymerit of such reim6ursements is ftnancia( lyfeasible and legallydefensi6le bySJAFCA. hrpan bylwA Z . - . n. b,l.er 92, 2028
B- 18
297
TEie Board should make decisions that cansider the impact to the Project and the services prov ded fo SJAFC.EI,heneficiaries at large,
The Board should make decisions that consider the proportianality of the invesement made Into th e levee imp ovement program.

Fbe- aar•d-a4to ld-r,aasider- tie-fiar aingof.cepayme.a o£capixalta.tliose_tnu.esttqg n_theleu improvement program.

For[, and Use Agencies due a reimbursement as a resulf nf Punding provtded to advance fihe Levee Improvement Program In ad ance of January 1, 2018
The reimbursemeni paficy wil! be consistent with the fotlowing under(ying princtples.

Na reimbursements should be paid from deve( opment fees to a tand use agency that advanced funds into the levee improvement program until atl Cevee impravement proJect costs are paid and the fevee improvement program has been completed and certified, unless otherwFse determined by SIAFCA that payment of such reimbursements is nancla!(y feasi6le and( egal(y defensible hy SJAFCA.

The Soard should make declsfons that consider the tmpact to the Aroject and the services pravided to SJAFCA beneficiaries at large.

The Board should make decisions that consider fhe proportionality Qf Che investment made into the evee irnpravement program.
7he Board should consider the timing of repayment of capital to thase investing in the tevee tmpravement program.
or Land Use Agencies due repayment pursuant ta the Interim Seed Money Funding Agr.eement dated lune 12, 2018
Repayrnent wtll be made conststent with Section 6 af tl at Agreement. i
Pie eroabycwa 3 Ortobet 22, 201$
B- 19
298
xx0
titi 0MONNvO
a
H
O O O
O C _ ' `-
i -
1 ri
p
i
c
Q . oN
a
m
a
o
v
y rn
v ` I

V DO DO N
1 c
n
N
u1
H ti
vo
p
y +
N
w
i
a °' c
a
N
o
m
o0
Q
u
p
o =
o 00
C1 o LL O
N
a rn
m
o
u
ocQ
f0
y
y
N O O
cZ
C
a
V? V? V l/
Q c0
c
L pp
N
U1O
N
CN
i+
7 y
7 IA
d
I
C
Y
L
v
LL I
m Vl i/? i? V}
N O
C
LL
f0
N a.+
Q '
o0
O
a
rri .
pa
T
N
a
i
N
p j
N LL U
v
i N I I
i0
N f9
t
u
oO OOi a
7 `—°
u
a
iy OC vf Q ri O O ri
G1
i
NN N -- I a
t i/? t/? t/ a
o Q/ c
U LL
N
3U
a Q.
a
U v
0 . L1 LL
NO
a a U
v
a.+
N
n v ' `
o
o
c
v '
u O
y
ro
00 C
yT flU
H io o E °
P' N L f0 LL
W
m { U! LL (
L 0
G1
f
6 C v `.
n oD 00 a 00
n .
a
C v +
r a s
Q +
w
C
3 in F
FJ o°1c t/ 1 U v "
Q
JL1 Ovia
B- 20
299
Table B- 2
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Total Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate
Revenue by Land Use
Year Single Family Multifamily Commercial Industrial Total Fee Revenue 1]
Table 8- 3 Table 8- 4 Table 8- 5 Table B- 6
2016 0 0 0 0 0
2017 0 0 0 0 0
2018 [ 2] N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A 826, 986
2019 [ 3] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 1, 888, 567
2020 [ 4] N/ A N/ A N! A N/ A 1, 368, 391
2021 [ 5] N/ A N/ A N/ A N! A 4, 829, 607
2022 [ 6] N/ A N/A N/ A N/A 2, 412, 968
2023 [ 7] $ 5, 914, 768 $ 924, 654 $ 1, 714, 059 3, 370, 859 11, 924,339 2024 1, 737, 125 $ 273, 360 $ 1, 299, 368 2, 172, 033 5, 481, 886 2025 2, 137, 102 $ 324, 379 $ 1, 459,618 2, 275, 118 6, 196, 217 2026 2, 011, 305 $ 400, 134 $ 1, 451, 422 1, 502, 223 5, 365, 085 2027 1, 525, 344 $ 328, 353 $ 1, 545, 733 1, 179, 264 4, 578, 694 2028 1, 467, 708 48, 118 $ 1, 524,633 1, 202, 462 4, 242, 921 2029 1, 497, 545 48, 854 $ 1, 651, 631 814, 677 4, 012, 708 2030 1, 566, 448 44, 295 $ 1, 933, 809 482, 013 4, 026, 565 2031 1, 597, 777 45, 181 $ 1, 816, 144 491, 654 3, 950, 755 2032 1, 629, 476 $ 142, 093 $ 1, 095, 718 501, 487 3, 368, 773 2033 1, 252, 109 97, 929 $ 1, 262, 442 1, 516, 322 4, 128, 801 2034 1, 275, 550 99, 887 $ 1, 287, 918 1, 491, 863 4, 155, 218 2035 734, 092 $ 101, 885 $ 1, 249, 266 1, 449,680 3, 534, 924 2036 515, 285 $ 103, 923 $ 1, 173, 957 1, 479, 291 3, 272, 456 2037 525, 591 $ 106, 001 844, 287 1, 029, 852 2, 505, 732 2038 536, 103 44, 600 662, 756 432, 665 1, 676, 124
2039 546, 825 0 675, 091 441, 318 1, 663, 235
2040 2, 165, 626 0 391, 540 450, 145 3, 007, 311
2041 1, 727, 689 0 426, 315 459, 148 2, 613, 151
2042 1, 762,243 0 434, 841 468, 331 2, 665, 414
2043 1, 797, 487 0 453, 496 476, 752 2, 727,735
2044 1, 833, 437 0 393, 622 0 2, 227, 060
2045 1, 870, 106 0 401, 495 0 2, 271, 601
2046 1, 907, 508 0 409, 525 0 2, 317, 033
2047 1, 945, 658 0 388, 646 0 2, 334, 304
2048 1, 984, 571 0 362, 437 0 2, 347, 009
2049 2, 024,263 0 369, 686 0 2, 393, 949
Total 45,488, 742 $ 3, 133, 646 $ 26, 679, 454 $ 23, 687, 158 110, 315, 519 1] Total projected fee revenue assumes a 2% escalation in the ENR Index. 2] Total revenues received January 2018 through December 2018. Amounts include interest for the program. 3] Total revenues received January 2019 through December 2019. Amounts include interest for the program. 4] Total revenues received January 2020 through December 2020. Amounts include interest for the program. 5] Total revenues received January 2021 through December 2021. Amounts include interest for the program. 6] Estimated revenues received January 2022 through November 2022. Amounts include interest for the program. 7] Estimated for 2023 based on update Impact Fee Rates as well any remaining collections not yet accounted for from 2022.

Prepared by LWA
B 21
1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Mode/ 2023 0110. x1sx
300
Table B- 3
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate- Single Family
Single Family Acres By Jurisdiction[ 1]
Unincorp Base
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table 8- 1
Initia/ Fee Rate/ Acre $ 21, 462
2016 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2017 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2018 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2019 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2020 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2021 61. 4 47. 7 6. 7 0. 0 115. 8 0
2022 89. 5 36. 3 6. 7 0. 0 132. 6 0
2023 113. 4 126. 4 20. 2 15. 7 275. 6 5, 914, 768
2024 0. 0 52. 4 11. 3 15. 7 79. 4 1, 737, 125
2025 3. 3 76. 8 0. 0 15. 7 95. 7 2, 137, 102
2026 3. 3 69. 4 0. 0 15. 7 88. 3 2, 011, 305
2027 3. 3 46. 7 0. 0 15. 7 65. 7 1, 525, 344
2028 3. 3 43. 0 0. 0 15. 7 61. 9 1, 467, 708
2029 3. 3 43. 0 0. 0 15. 7 62. 0 1, 497, 545
2030 3. 3 44. 6 0. 0 15. 7 63. 5 1, 566, 448
2031 3. 3 44. 6 0. 0 15. 7 63. 5 1, 597, 777
2032 3. 3 44. 6 0. 0 15. 7 63. 5 1, 629, 476
2033 3. 3 44. 6 0. 0 0. 0 47. 9 1, 252, 109
2034 3. 2 44. 6 0. 0 0. 0 47. 8 1, 275, 550
2035 0. 0 27. 0 0. 0 0. 0 27. 0 734, 092
2036 0. 0 18. 6 0. 0 0. 0 18. 6 515, 285
2037 0. 0 18. 6 0. 0 0. 0 18. 6 525, 591
2038 0. 0 18. 6 0. 0 0. 0 18. 6 536, 103
2039 0. 0 18. 6 0. 0 0. 0 18. 6 546, 825
2040 56. 4 15. 7 0. 0 0. 0 72. 1 2, 165, 626
2041 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 727, 689
2042 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 762, 243
2043 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 797, 487
2044 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 833, 437
2045 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 870, 106
2046 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 907, 508
2047 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 945, 658
2048 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 1, 984, 571
2049 56. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 56. 4 2, 024, 263
Total 860. 6 881. 4 44. 9 156. 8 1, 943. 7 $ 45, 488, 742 1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SIAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres( ac) P:\ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale\ DAP\[ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale DAP Modeling 2021 0716- Ol. xlsx] Prepared by LWA
8_22 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Mode12023 0110. x1sx 301
Table B- 4
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate- Multifamily
Multifamily Acres By Jurisdiction[ 1]
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table 8- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 20, 084
2016 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2017 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2018 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2019 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2020 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2021 1. 6 0. 0 7. 5 0. 0 9. 1 0
2022 8. 5 2. 6 7. 5 0. 0 18. 5 0
2023 16. 5 13. 5 16. 0 0. 0 46. 0 924, 654
2024 5. 4 7. 9 0. 0 0. 0 13. 3 273, 360
2025 5. 4 10. 1 0. 0 0. 0 15. 5 324, 379
2026 5. 4 5. 8 7. 5 0. 0 18. 8 400, 134
2027 5. 4 2. 2 7. 5 0. 0 15. 1 328, 353
2028 0. 0 2. 2 0. 0 0. 0 2. 2 48, 118
2029 0. 0 2. 2 0. 0 0. 0 2. 2 48, 854
2030 1. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 9 44, 295
2031 1. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 9 45, 181
2032 1. 9 0. 0 4. 0 0. 0 5. 9 142, 093
2033 0. 0 0. 0 4.0 0. 0 4. 0 97, 929
2034 0. 0 0. 0 4. 0 0. 0 4. 0 99, 887
2035 0. 0 0. 0 4. 0 0. 0 4. 0 101, 885
2036 0. 0 0. 0 4. 0 0. 0 4. 0 103, 923
2037 0. 0 0. 0 4. 0 0. 0 4.0 106, 001
2038 0. 0 0. 0 1. 7 0. 0 1. 7 44, 600
2039 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2040 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2041 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2042 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2043 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2044 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2045 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2046 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2047 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2048 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2049 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
Total 54. 1 46. 5 71. 7 0.0 172. 2 3, 133, 646
1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres( ac) P:\ 1801000 SIAFCA Mossdale\ DAP\[ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale DAP Modeling 20210716- 01. xlsx] Prepared by LWA
B_23 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 0110. x1sx 302
Table B- 5
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate- Commercial
Commercial Acres By Jurisdiction[ 1]
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table 8- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 20,307
2016 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2017 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2018 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2019 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2020 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2021 8. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 8. 1 0
2022 40. 1 12. 7 44. 6 1. 9 99. 3 0
2023 40. 1 16. 5 24. 0 3. 8 84. 4 1, 714, 059
2024 40. 1 16. 5 2. 3 3. 8 62. 7 1, 299, 368
2025 40. 1 20. 3 2. 3 6. 3 69. 1 1, 459, 618
2026 38. 4 20. 3 2. 3 6. 3 67. 4 1, 451, 422
2027 38. 4 21. 4 2. 3 8. 3 70. 3 1, 545, 733
2028 38. 4 19. 1 2. 3 8. 3 68. 0 1, 524, 633
2029 38. 4 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 72. 2 1, 651, 631
2030 49. 1 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 82. 9 1, 933, 809
2031 42. 5 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 76. 3 1, 816, 144
2032 12. 4 22. 2 2. 3 8. 3 45. 2 1, 095, 718
2033 12. 4 22. 2 2. 3 14. 1 51. 0 1, 262, 442
2034 12. 4 22. 2 2. 3 14. 1 51. 0 1, 287, 918
2035 12. 4 22. 2 2. 3 11. 6 48. 5 1, 249, 266
2036 12. 4 18. 4 2. 3 11. 6 44. 7 1, 173, 957
2037 12. 4 5. 2 2. 3 11. 6 31. 5 844, 287
2038 12. 4 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 24. 3 662, 756
2039 12. 4 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 24. 2 675, 091
2040 0. 0 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 13. 8 391, 540
2041 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 14. 7 426, 315
2042 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 14. 7 434, 841
2043 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 8. 0 15. 0 453, 496
2044 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 393, 622
2045 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 401, 495
2046 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 409, 525
2047 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 4. 8 11. 9 388, 646
2048 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 3. 8 10. 9 362, 437
2049 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 3. 8 10. 9 369, 686
Total 521. 3 354. 9 128. 4 206. 7 1, 211. 3 26, 679, 454 1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres( ac) P:\ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale\ DAP\[ 1801000 SJAfCA Mossdale DAP Modeling 20210716- 01. xlsx] Prepared 6y LWA
8_24 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Mode12023 0110. x1sx 303
Table B- 6
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate- Industrial
Industrial Acres By Jurisdiction
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table 8- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 15, 907
2016 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2017 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2018 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2019 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2020 19. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 19. 1 0
2021 90. 8 68. 0 0. 0 0. 0 158. 8 0
2022 64. 3 64. 2 0. 0 0. 0 128. 5 0
2023 96. 4 115. 5 0. 0 0. 0 211. 9 3, 370, 859
2024 64. 3 69. 6 0. 0 0. 0 133. 9 2, 172, 033
2025 64. 3 73. 2 0. 0 0. 0 137. 5 2, 275, 118
2026 64. 3 24. 7 0. 0 0. 0 89. 0 1, 502, 223
2027 64. 9 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 68. 5 1, 179, 264
2028 64. 9 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 68. 5 1, 202, 462
2029 41. 9 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 45. 5 814, 677
2030 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 26. 4 482, 013
2031 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 26. 4 491, 654
2032 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 26. 4 501, 487
2033 22. 8 3. 6 23. 0 28. 9 78. 2 1, 516, 322
2034 22. 8 3. 6 20. 2 28. 9 75. 4 1, 491, 863
2035 22. 8 0. 0 20. 2 28. 9 71. 9 1, 449, 680
2036 22. 8 0. 0 20. 2 28. 9 71. 9 1, 479, 291
2037 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 28. 9 49. 1 1, 029, 852
2038 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 432, 665
2039 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 441, 318
2040 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 450, 145
2041 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 459, 148
2042 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 468, 331
2043 0. 0 0. 0 20. 2 0. 0 20. 2 476, 752
2044 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2045 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2046 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2047 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2048 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
2049 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0
Total 794. 7 443. 9 225. 0 144. 3 1, 607. 9 23, 687, 158 lj Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres( ac) P:\ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale\ DAP\[ 1801000 SJAFCA Mossdale DAP Modeling 2021 0716- 01. xlsx] Prepared by LWA
B_25 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 0110. x1sx 304
Table B7
Mossdale Trect: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Creditable Pre- Project Expenditures
Pre- Project Expenditure- Contrector( Amendment/ Task Order) Cost Funding Source Amount Peterson Brustad- Agreement No. 1 123, 244 Manteca 61, 622 Funding 11/ 2014 Staff Report River Islands 15, 500
Saybrook CLSP 13, 020
Richland 14, 415
Lathrop Gateway/ lazares 3, 720
Saybrook ClSP 14, 967
123 244 123, 244
Peterson Brustad- Agreement No. 2 7, 500 Lathrop 7,500
7, 500 7, 500
PetersonBrustad- AgreementNo. 3 17, 499 Lathrop 17, 499 17, 499 17, 499
Peterson Brustad- Agreement No. 4 50,000 Saybrook CLSP 25, 000 Lathrop 25, 000
50, 000 50, 000
Peterson Brustad- Agreement No. 5 2, 589, 197 Manteca 863, 066 Lathrop 750,000
Saybrook ClSP 500, 000
Others 476, 131
2, 589, 197 2, 589, 197
Larsen Wurzel& Associates, Inc.- Agreement No. 1( A; 63, 540 Lathrop 42, 360 Financial Planning/ Gran t Application M antenca 21, 180 63, 540 63, 540
Larsen Wurzel& Associates, Inc.- Agreement No. 1( B; 580, 010 Lathrop 53, 340 Financial Plon for ULOP Mantenca 26, 670
80, 010 80, 030
Larsen Wurzel& Associates, Inc.- Agreement No. 3
Financial Plan Implementation& Anolysis
Tosk Order No. 1 172, 018 Lathrop 114, 679
Manteca 57, 339
TaskOrderNo. 2 126, 300 RD17 126, 300
z98, 318 298, 318
SIAFCA Seed Funding Agreement Loans& Interest in Fund 313, 351 lathrop 115, 000 Manteca 65, 000
Stockton 65, 000
SJ County 65, 000
Interest( Use of Money) 3, 351
313, 351 313, 351
Total Cost/ Sources 3, 542, 659 Lathrop 1, 126, 621
Lathrop Gateway/ Lazares 3, 720
Manteca 1, 095, 580
Stackton 65, 703
SJ County 65, 703
Oth ers 476, 131
Richland 14, 415
River Islands 15, 500
Saybrook CLSP 552, 987
RD 17 126, 300
3, 542, 659 3, 542, 659
Source: City of Lathrop, LWA
Prepared by LWA B_26 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 OIIO. xlsx 305
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX C:

RD 17 LSRP PROJECT SUPPORTING TABLES
Table C1 Remaining Expenditure Schedule for Phase 3 LSRP ................................................ C- 1 Table C2 EIP Funding Agreement Credit................................................................................. C- 2 Table C3 State Payments Received to Date& State Share Remaining................................... C- 3 Table C4 Expenses Reported to DWR..................................................................................... C- 4 Table C5 Historic RD 17 Financial Statements........................................................................ C- 6 LWA

LARSEN WURZEI
ASSOCipt65. nC. 1801014 Adequote Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 0118.docx 306
h
O O
k
J
0 F
O
O
0 Q tr1
MMONNa
MN
C
O
U
N
0 OuN
u
N
o
nn
N
N
M
M
O
ZO O00
0 0
N n n
o ,
r;
N rri
V
O
O
m '^ '^ N ^ N lmD tMp
p.
lD
D
N
M1
O ^ ^ N
M
M
Q
O
O
M ^ ^ ONM
M
N 1p 1p O O
M u1 N I 1 O rvj tv1
N C l0 l0 m O O
N NO ^
M
M
N
L aa
o0
a
m n in
a.

N 1 1
N
O
m
M J ` l0 lG O Q
l0 l0
GN ti-y
C
N L
00 MON
a ti
NA
v
3 v ya Q W N C
O ' N .

N
N
c i
p
N
Q
u
c
3 d
v
ca
S
wa
y ,
Y
v
a
6 s o £ o
v
w
a
C1 307
xx00MNONva0c
vcac
rnr+ v
a
mo o
oo r ri
o
t
iN m ^ a
Vf r- I'
N
vj
N
f0
OO
tiOWti
a_+
lO l0O
Y O
O 111
v
cr1 Ll1N
0 lD I l0
0 NM
a`
o
J
a
e_uo
N
W
NG1
OAO
y
a`
saa
3 '
p
V
LU
Oi
Q
a
N
y
y'
O QN d LQ Q Vf In VI y
fC ( 6 ( 6
t t t
v eo i
a a a
Y
y
vi ai
d d a ry
CO
d
a OC "
G
W
J
JJJ FJaQJLava
G2
308
xx0
ti0OmNNvOUacu0
O O ONO1 00 tM0 00
N o0 00 O
M
M O
v
Q
N '
m
a
u1 lmD ^
N
nia
o
oo00 i O M o0 .-^- - 1 M Nl1
d I a' 00
O
O N t0
C f6yj
m lD M
O 01 ^ V1
0 cI
N rI V1
1 1 01
ey
N
M
N
iy
O iQ. N
ui
Nm
m
m
o
n r^-+
m
N
Oi u1
O N tr u1
O
N l0 00
N I 00
l
j I M
O
j
Y
00 00 N I1 -- I -- I
00 00 lD lD L N ^
a
O N N ri I lfj 00
M
d FI
N d'
Gl '' f0
f00O
N Q
j
N ' N
v
N
O eN - I
rn
0 O ` O O O O a,,,
O\1 M (
6 F- 00 i-- I -- I 7 ' Q
u
a
v
1O n ^
z
GJ uf
Y
N a+ p
H
N FN
Jvanva
C3
309
Table C4
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Total Actual and Estimated Expenses Reported to DWR
Fiscal LSRP- Phase I LSRP- Phase II LSRP- Phase III
Project Quarter Year
Quarter Expenses Expenses Expenses
Quarter 1 2010 Q1 0 866, 617 223, 200
Quarter 2 2010 Q2 0 1, 973, 380 558, 289
Quarter 3 2010 Q3 2, 019 944, 450 330, 377
Quarter 4 2010 Q4 2, 717 320, 758 474, 112
Quarter 5 2011 Q1 1, 756 58, 861 563, 240
Quarter 6 2011 Q2 0 327, 945 177, 526
Quarter 7 2011 Q3 1, 413 79, 657 169, 326
Quarter 8 2011 Q4 2, 247 27, 994 178, 793
Quarter 9 2012 Q1 0 119, 734 209, 277
Quarter 10 2012 Q2 1, 311 379, 956 150, 024
Quarter 11 2012 Q3 1, 444 552, 568 121, 165
Quarter 12 2012 Q4 502 383, 096 139, 318
Quarter 13 2013 Q1 0 83, 459 177, 599
Quarter 14 2013 Q2 638 107, 557 120, 283
Quarter 15 2013 Q3 509 7, 251 150, 287
Quarter 16 2013 Q4 0 4, 524 160, 103
Quarter 17 2014 Q1 0 369 174, 827
Quarter 18 2014 Q2 0 6, 935 272, 888
Quarter 19 2014 Q3 0 9, 000 145, 107
Quarter 20 2014 Q4 999 7, 444 289, 306
Quarter 21 2015 Q1 7, 930 7, 717 213, 506
Quarter 22 2015 Q2 7, 140 18, 637 173, 810
Quarter 23 2015 Q3 540 7, 305 224, 115
Quarter 24 2015 Q4 0 0 1, 114, 855
Quarter 25 2016 Q1 3, 720 8, 378 472, 267
Quarter 26 2016 Q2 228 25, 387 205, 565
Quarter 27 2016 Q3 0 20, 015 225, 024
Quarter 28 2016 Q4 0 69, 326 347, 394
Quarter 29 2017 Q1 0 9, 934 3, 184, 943
Quarter 30 2017 Q2 0 6, 489 2, 621, 495
Quarter 31 2017 Q3 0 0 862, 141
Quarter 32 2017 Q4 0 0 990, 150
Quarter 33 2018 Q1 0 0 257, 589
Quarter 34 2018 Q2 0 0 267, 170
Quarter 35 2018 Q3 0 58, 041 244, 441
Quarter 36 2018 Q4 0 10, 068 250, 358
Quarter 37 2019 Q1 0 0 109, 934
Quarter 38 2019 Q2 0 0 408, 863
Quarter 39 2019 Q3 0 0 307, 982
Quarter 40 2019 Q4 0 0 945, 541
Quarter 41 2020 Q1 0 12, 015 2, 479, 798
Quarter 42 2020 Q2 0 7, 990 2, 174, 239
Prepored by LWA Page 1 of 2 I801000 Mossdole Tract Financing Model 2023 OIIO. xlsx C- 4
310
Table C4
Mossdale Tract: 2022 Adequate Progress Report
Total Actual and Estimated Expenses Reported to DWR
Fiscal LSRP- Phase I LSRP- Phase II LSRP- Phase III
Project Quarter Year
Quarter Expenses Expenses Expenses
Quarter 43 2020 Q3 0 6, 375 534, 295
Quarter 44 2020 Q4 0 0 204, 616
Quarter 45 2021 Q1 0 10, 076 496, 529
Est. Quarter 46 2021 Q2 0 6, 000 242, 700
Est. Quarter 47 2021 Q3 0 6, 000 643, 700
Est. Quarter 48 2021 Q4 0 6, 000 218, 240
Est. Quarter 49 2022 Q1 0 6, 000 218, 240
Balance through December 2022 0 2, 631, 382 26, 011, 738 Total 35, 112 $ 9, 194, 690 $ 51, 436, 284
Source: KSN, LWA
Prepored by LWA Page 2 of 2 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 OIlO. xlsx G5
311
xh
X
Oti
O
MN
a
v
0 N a
N m000 r m . V nmrvooio n000m oo . m ou m i
mm n '+ ovorvr.i m i. mo n m c. i om n
ry in in in o r . oo m in m c oo in r v n m o
V
N O ll1 N Qi 00 00 O l0 V lD N ul ll1 i I 01 N 00 lD O
I O
N
1 V lD M '- I N M
i ln a I
i.--I M I N
Q d
r+ i 00 O 1 N 01 c- I V e- I V7 M N o0 lD tl1 00 O n' 7 a0 c- 1 m O tl1 01 3 M 01 1 Lr1 lD rl O V O N N lD lD n' 1 I m O vl m N lD O f' 1 P y
N in in u7 n ' to N . a0 Oi n in m a oo v7 ni v in m O
v O
O V1 N Ol 00 00 O tD V lD N lfl c- I 01 N 00 l0
CI O
N
h V O m .-+ N m
ti vl a ?
e- 1-- I M rl QQ
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i p
M
rlrl
N 00 01 l0 V1 1 O ti V V1 N lIl l0 tY1 I 00 00 O Il1 00 m m O I N V N tD O1 M M N ll) I 00 Lf1 Ol Ol 00 00 O O t+' 1 M V O N 1 O I Vl N ' D tD O n' 1 -- V N O N ' ' ' N lYl Ql V1 V .--I ' O ' ' ' h lll N a N cv1- I N O t O l+l N V 00 lll l0 i .-- I 01 N I N l0 ` m 7 M O O1 lD 00 M .-- I N
V1 O V1 V7 ` m
rl N M i
aom n o . v nrv niom n00000 noo m m o . "
vr m m mrv nnoo nrnm 000000mm v v oN LL
or nr c om .-ivrvoN rvmm nc . p nN eo
M.-- I N O 1 O M N a 00 tl1 lD I .- i Qt N I N lD o
O
f m O 01 l0 00 M .- 1 N O `N
rvo
1 ei N M'^ v
dN
a
o
e. i oo no ao oo .-+ omrvooN N000000 n . ao oNm m . ,"
momou m mor . noo . o mr moom m o . o orn e _
nm . . in a inn000000cvm . . covoo nv m ovv mm e .

V N O V O N N V 00 N V t+l V h 1 .- i
m c oo v o 0 0o v v .-, m '" m vmi n o
n in . m .-+ oo c m m LL
ri ri wi rri vi v
00 f I I O OO 00 .-- I O M O O N N 00 00 O O V1 .- 00 O N M Ol .-- I P ¢ M O O O V1 01 D M O N u' 1 ao l0 m N N1 O O ' 1 tD Q O .- 1 O O Ol N I Ql .-- I .-- I V1 ' a V) 1 00 00 00 N Ol .-- I .- I 00 V 00 V7 V ' M O V V f+1 f/ 1 N .+ V N O V O N N 00 N M V 1 1 .-- i O.-- I N M iD N
J m V op V o O oo V I V . 1 m v7 m n h O .
in n . m .- oo v m m
ri ri ri ni vi 3
O
N
K
C
N
N
N
00O
a`
v
fO
u
v c
7 y ' C v
v a c v
Q m a ai o
e u v c a
No C a
N C Ol C 3
C
7 N
fo p. ua+ h U l
y ^ tCa '^ X
7 ' O W O V
C
O`
X Ul C N O V U) i Y
J

N Y N Y
C G yi . pq N C t0 C 7J
p
d
y
h C
C v 0
F O
N > C
p_ C .
p O X' O r N ~ fl. C O C J ' ta r+ C O
W OC N N ' a+ ` 1 Y j Y N C ' d
V
C ' N
y
O C n
N O_
N
U1 O p_ y
7 N ta . w — N u
C'
y
U ' OV } U N a N f0 K N C y
O v C N E N
a+ V [ -
p
O., a+ C Ql W L
v Y m m a i a o ,.
01, . c
c ' oo nOn on >' o > > o
a. ` v c a"i c ' a c
a
o w H N > y Q a` O a o x w > d u a w O H Q O a n. m m s w c° o a
p v r i s u, a
C- 6
312
x
x
0 ti
0 mON
v
O
n a
ti
e v rvmvv o0 ovoinrn n0000 m nmoin .-+ o n oo n 2
ooio . r oaoor mnrvommo o a
ao nr in e .-. . o in v n .- oo m m n in in . o0 0 0 c
ui o a i6 oi.- i vi ui vi i i ry ai . i.- i ni a
N . n . m m a . ry '+
V .-i V1 '- I a- i N .- 1 V M I
rl rl rl N
d a
r. irnvv ao oao nm n0000 m nmo n . o n oo . 3
oo . n r rv n0000cv m r omrno n o v
00 lD N ul ' N .-- i .-- I O Vl V 1 .-- I o0 M M I Vl N .-- 00 O O tG 9 n
tl1 O I a lD Ol I.-- i V1 VI ul I N M N Ql Vl c- I M
i N .-- I tlf -- I Ol n' 7 V - I I N I rl E
V .--I Vf .-- I .-- I N .-- I V M O
I N rl Q
0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
aC
o
m
C
N 00 Ql lf1 V ul V 00 I N Vl .-- 1 O Ol N lD O M O 1 N O I N 9 Vl O tO N t+ 1 O .-- Ol M N r/ 1 Ol .- N ti O N O lD o0 O O N y l0 O1 V M l0 V t O V1 00 V o0 O O I O m I VI pp N O o0 rl N 00 V lD V lD f/ 1 C N N V I l0 tYl V1 i I Ql V O 00 V1 ` m y O V O . 00 rr1 v1 O V . V V N O 01
00 C .-- M .- .-- i .- 1 m .-- i ul O ` m
1 N rl j
00 Ol Vl V lA V Q 00 I N lA .- 1 O 01 N lD O n' 1 O M N O I N ` ei Vl O lD N f' 1 O . y Ol n' 1 N M 01 .-- N i O N O 00 O Ol e i " D Ol V m l0 V V O ln 00 V o0 O O I O M I v1 p N O o0 rl p
w
00 V l0 V lD n' 1 a N N R I l0 t+ 1 ul I 1 Ol V O 00 V1 a O
U ovo . m m nov . v a nio rn
0o v . m .- i .- .- i m .-+ n
N
a o
ti N ei^' N
dl0
a
a
M E
NO I 01 1 Vl ei I I I Vl a-- 1 I V ri N 00 N O lfl -- I lD O 00 O N O 00 V l' 1 1 N Ln l0 N I -- i 00 N f P/ 1 I O V N u' O M O - Ql .-- I V 00 ' M N 1 l0 N M O Ql .-- I M O .--I I. f1 n .-- 1 tfl 00 1 .

N O 1 M n' 1 V1 n' 7 .-- I V1 .-- i 00 M V 00 I- 1 I I I M Kf c U Vl O .-- i O 1 V M lD .-- i M h .-- i .-- i f1 1O
V .- .-- t0 e- .-- ul O LL
i rl c- i N
i Ol I n . ti I I I n .-- i I V .-- N oo N O v1 .-- O O ao tD Q' O 00 V ' 1 1 N V1 l0 N 1 OO N I n' 1 I O V N V1 O M O
Ol .-- I V o0 ' M N I lD N n' 7 O Ol c- 1 M O .-- I I .-- I t! 1 00 1 .- i O I M m Vf fv1.-- i ul 00' 1 V 00 i.--1 i I I t+l M
U vi o . o n v m n v . m i . n .
v . . o n o
rl I N
CW
N CN W
O p
a`
d u
c
7 0
a m C d
9 C
Q i0 Y C
N Q N O tJ l C Q aa
N C
O 0 Y O C O N
N C
U C 7C N\ O_
V` y1
a+ N
U
C
Cl
y
n Y n X
7 ' O N O u
C O X Cl C N O V U) v y
J
I W C y
7 f0 C a
C t0 Ol N C O N U O
F- 0
L' N >
C d d C -
p O X O L y
d C p
N
N C 7 '` ra a+ C
w a '° Q
E y, J
v j Y v v v Y
u c x „ -° ,,, ' ,
v v
c v v v
o
y
v n
E
o a °' °.
u '° u > U3 °' v — C
a
c o a
Q N ,,°1, E u
Y , n E °"' f6' `
v ' x
d ` a p m m ai io o
v r
y '
en o`°u e010 >- o > > o. w
i v n c v c . ' n a c
oi u"i y in Q a O a a X w > a v a w O r Q a d m m z w cj 0 C`i
LL LL s
a
C- 7
313
x
X
O
ti
O
M
a o
ry
N
O
N
d
ON N m V1 VI 01 M o0 Ol ul n' 1 r1 O O I ln o0 n' 1 O n' 1 V V1 00 1 l M N Vl l0 lf1 M M N I N O N 00 I I 00 N O V1 O I 01 V1
mmvoo
y
n nmmn o n . m n ip . oo ao v
N i ll1 M O N n' 7 O V N M ll1 00 V N N VI lD O
U O lIl 00 l0 M lO n' 1 ci N I lD 00 L
oo n . . m v n I
N N Q1
d a
r m ui in m m oo m in m . o o n in oo m o m v in ao n 3 At N LI1 lD V1 M fY1 N I N O N CO I 1 00 N O lf1 O I Ol V1 y
m m
a
oo . n m m n n n . m in . oo m
v O
e- 111 P/ 1 O N M O V N tY1 ul 00 V N N V1 l0 c
J O l! 1 00 l0 M lD M .-- I N i 1p 00 C
oo . . . r m v n „
r- i e i tN 0
h
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
a
o
n
0N
v mv00ioo o c. i rnomo m . or oam ao9
v io ooNo n n . a
oo . aory i. rn m rvN . vr n ao n o nin a
V n' 1 tl1 00 n' 1 V1 CO O N M V lfl 00 I Ol .-- I lD lD.-- I 01 7 O V V1 N I. fl Ql I .-- I I lD l0 t1 V1 n
v . o in . . . m n . m o ;
i i ni v>
I f+'1 lD N I 00 M 00 00 00 I N lD Ol O M O M -- I O N 00 M 00 I l0 00 V I n' 7 ul O .-- V I l0 O O N O n lD l0 f v1 .-- i l0 00 .-- 1 a0 N ' I 01 lD lD lD Ol ' N N .- 1 V I ll1 00 VI l0 I Vl o
V M V1 00 M Y1 00 O N M V tl7 00 I Ol .-- 1 lD l0.-- i 01 o O
U o v n a n m . . io m n
v '. o n . . . m n . m m
o a
i r. i a
M
dNOAN
a
a
o
N n t ao r . ry in o m o 0 o co o m o co m rv o
l0 1 .-- Vl O O .-- i vl N l0 V I 00 vl .--
I V 01 O N o0 r+ 1 lD 01 .-- lD N O M c. n lD l0 m 0 0 V M N.-- i.--I 01 O Vl 00 M Vl N Vl 00 V c- 1 M I. f1 i o m m o o o v .- i m n n
v . n n ti . m . v o ;
c- 1 rl N' a
i r1 I l0 a0 I ti N v7 O 01 O O O W O M O oo O N t0 l0 ¢' iD I ul O O ti vt N D V i 00 vt O N O vl .- i ul 00 / 1 . h V 01 O ' N 00 t'/ 7 l0 Ol -- I lD N O ' ' fn c- I V I V7 l0 ' lD M 00 M N .-- I.- i 01 O V1 00 M tll N V1 00 t I M V1 1
Cy o m m o o v . m n in o .
v . vf . ti . m . v o
ti a N
O
N
C
c
N 41
E
o
a`
v
v c
c.' 1O
y ° c ai
9 v
Q m c
e u v a w o
N C
fl- Y
o m c v . a o Y
u, 3
N C
v
C C tu \ d j
a+ U
C i
V
1 Y X
OJ i O U

C O X N C
U) O U Ul y J
L ~
y`. C Y N tCa
7 N
m C a
C O
C
C V — ' O
H U1 > C O.

C
O x
O r U1 ~ fl. p
O ro N C ' ta a+ C
N 10
N
N > pl
Cl Y y UJ u u u c X
C
O c N
a C "
y°'-, >
c v v v ,,,
v o_
N E °; ' a ° 1 a v
v
m u
T 3 - 9 y `° : 4 a
c
y v v
ai E '° . . w a — . o
a Y c v
x
d
9 o m m w Y o
a r c y ' en nf0n o°10 >- o > > o
o. ` v a c a i ' n ' c
W
a
u i u i y n Q a O a 0 X w > a z U o. w O Q d a m v i' m w U a
O x a
C- 8
314
x
x
0 ti
0 NO
v
O
e N
N I M 00 rl 00 l0 00 Q1 01 -- I '- 1 N 00 V1 1 n' 1 lD I V1 I V I I N tl1 l m m .-' O o0 O V V I M t 00 V I .- v1 1 I ti Ln M lD I V1 01 O I 00 ' ' 1 00 I l0 O O n' 1 N I M 00 l0 01 00 I V7 M N r I ll1 .-- I 1 N Ol M O M 00 lD V1 V V .--I l0.-- I I M N.-- I Ql tD l' 1 l0 CS 7 00 Ol 00 01 00 tfl M M -- 1 -- I O
N V Vn1 V
I rl fYl C{
3 a
mm .
moo
o
oo
000cvr
oomm .
mnoovn .-
rvoo nr m
nnn .-
n nnv
i nm n
nr
n
n a
ma
o ao oo o 0 o m r m ao m oo im m i in .-
9 O
01 M O M 00 lD lf1 V V .--I lD .-- I I n' 1 N.-- I 01 l0 n' 1 t0 7 00 Ol 00 01 00 ln t+'1 M -- I - 1 O
N V V^f ?
I rl l' 1 a 0
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i p
ON
N Ol Ol O M 00 I I O m V1 lD o0 I Ol V r' n r1 I O V O I 00 m M N Q ' M O V I n' 1 01 O Ol ll1 I 00 .-- I Ol M M tD V Ol Vl L. f1 O V N h .-- I l0 N a 01 ri V' . i N 00 Vl 00 .-- 1 V O V I V - 1 I V1 00 00 I l.fl tT1 N N 00 l0 VI N h Oi 00 0o O t+ 1 I m m ry m O Vl.-- i I m N. ti tD o0 01 O a ll7 01 I 00 N a V Ol 00 lfl n' 1 n' 1 .-- I .-- I 1
00 V - 1 l0 N I N ' 7 a `n
n; vi v>"
mmomoo om n . 000 mvm .-+ novor ao m mry a "
movnm m ominnao .- mmm vmin novN n c. e. iLL
m . v r oo noo . V ovnv . n0000ninmry ry oo no
I 01 00 00 O M I M n' 1 N n' 1 O ul c- 1 I m N c- i l0 00 01 O p O
00 V -^i
00 N NOt 00 I. l1 M fY1 .-- I .-- I
I N V a o
t+ l e- 1 lfl M a ^' 41
d
a
E
ONN Ol O N pl .-- 1 u' lIl O V1 lf1 O L! 1 M Ql O Ol N I , M . 1 .-- i O lD O m N V1 .- I Vl O N .- M O O O M O _
O a0 O ' ' 00 .-- .-- i o0 N a0 00 O O tY1 ul 1 Lr1 00 ul V 00 . 00 lD Op N V N I 00 O M O 01 V I 01 I N
m a 000mv .-, .-, .-- o v n c
V - 1 1 N V N V D LL
c- i rl 1 v
O1 O V N O ' i V1 V1 O V1 O ul O1 O O C N I Q'
n' 1 G iD O r'/ 1 N vt Vt O N m O O O n' 1 O .

O a0 O ' ' 00 .-- 1 .-- I 00 N 00 00 O O M V1 I Vl a0 V1 00 . 00 l0 00 N V N I 00 O lD Qi V I Ol 1 N
a
V `
10-
1 Ol
N
00 Ol •-- I •-- I
V N V
r- I 1 rl
t
W
C
N v
1 O
a`
v
f0v c
7 A o
S
C jp C d
WO C v
Q 10 C @
N
d 61 O
V
y1 C y,,
N C
C a
a, O N N
N C
V
C
C v ia+ N X' V
F+ '^ U C C
j
n
n X
7 " 6
07 O U
C O X Ul C O! O V Ql d Y
J
C C
0 GJ Q1 H
C E
H ~ L' N }' > C fl O X O L N ~ O. O
O N C 7
u
ta C
t1
Gl d' 10
T
F+ v
01 ` N u U U
y
C X
C " 6 - UJ O. N O O_ 01
n w
3 w ¢ 01 y « v ,, Y — , c v v 6
v ; ;, _ , a v a y
u
y •`-' > f7 3
a v v u a ' o v —
v ° v c ` a v v «; u
Y `° - a
n
a c v W i
A C '
N N y vl Q d
C
O d Q
6 J w
OJl Ol to O O C Q 7 J N m d O N Q N N a
c
N
x
a u — a w O f- Q a a m in m w u a v

C S LL LL C W
C- 9
315
x
X
O
ti
O
O
v
O
a a
N
N t+' 1 ll7 01 I ll7 M Ql .-- 1 Q1 lD O V1 Ol V1 Ol V1 I 01 M .-- I l0 N l0 Ol 00 l 00 M l+'1 V7 I I 00 lD M fn 00 I N t' 1 lfl t' 1 I. f1 V l0 Ql lll Ol Ql 01 0 y.
lD 00 N ' ' 1 l0 lD ll) O N N I 00 O N 00 c- 1 Ol 00 l( 1 t+'1 N ' ' ' ' ' n' 1 ' N O " N N O Qt N Vj Llj tv1 Q1 I I N a0 V N N I .-- l0 rl O
f O Ol
m
O 01 Vl m M .-- I .-- I O
N
O
OO
i i m vi v
a a
m m m ui m m r. m o o n m in m in n m m . r m o0 3 a
0o m m n n n oo m m oo r m n m n c m n m m m oo v"i
lD 00 N ' ' I lD lO lf1 O N N I 00 O N 00 .-- I Ol 00 ul h' 1 N ryl N O ' i v O
N O Ql N Lll Vl( v1 Ql I I N 00 V N N I .-- I lD rl c
J N O Ol N .- I O O1 Vl M M .-- .-- i O 01 O O C
l0 N 01 M e- 1 V1 N Vl O r
O I rl tY1 V1
Q
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
aC
o
mG
mN
N D lD 00 O -- I lD V - i V Ql N O l0 ti l0 N pl V l0 01 p1 1 N 00 N lD 00 O 00 Ol lD V ll1 n' 1 lD O Ql .-- I I I N N ' I V M '- I lf1 fN a 00 Ql tY1 N V lfl 00 tY1 .-- I N N LA I -- I I O Ol 00 V1 M N N 00 f' 1 V1 N O V lD N lD N O I l0 t' 1 I N h V N N ll7 N-- I V1
Ol Ol O O 01 tA M M .- i -- I

V N V W
i ri rri a r
l0 lD 00 O -- I l0 V - 1 V Ql N O lD .-- 1 l0 N O1 V l0 01 O1 V1 N 00 N lD 00 V O 00 Ol lD V V1 M lD O Ol .- 1 h 1 N N V h V n' 1 .-- 1 tl1 N " 00 01 tY1 ' N V tl7 a0 f! 1 .-- 1 N N Ifl I .-- I I O 01 00 lfl M N ' ' ' ' ' N ' 00 f' 1 1l1 a O V l0 N l0 N O I lD n' 1 I N I V N N 11 N ti
mmm
u1 0
o0 oom nmm .-, r+ o oam nn
V1 .-- I 00 M .-- I V N 00 0
i n; v
m
a n
a
a
o
C
N E
NO N l0 N N V I I •- I .-- 1 O Ol lD 00 N lll N N O O 00 -- f' 1 lf7 D 01 r I O V N Vf O ti I O I V1 M l0 Ol 01 .-- O O M lD V Vl I V O1 _ lD n' 1 V1 ' ' V1 lf1 lD N lO .-- I N I .-- I lfl Ol lD O 01 00 ll1 n' 1 N O Vl O O .

N Ol Ql M N I Q1 00 ll1 I. l1 N l0 N I('/ 1 N N lD V I Q 7 V1 00 Qt Q Ql 01 00 M M -- I -- I O I I rl
L! 1 .-- I 00 N fY1 N V 1 LL
ri ri ni v v
N l0 N i V I I .-- 1 .-- I O O1 lD 00 N V1 N N O O 00 -- i 7 lfl lO 01 Q 1 O V N V1 O .-- I I O I Vl m l0 01 Ol O O n' 1 tD V tl1 1 V 01 . lD f+ l ln Vf l! 1 lD N lD -- I N I -- I tfl 01 l0 O Ol 00 VI f l N O ' lIl O O . i Ol Ol t+1 N 1 Ql 00 Vl lf1 N l0 N I Ivl N N l0 V I C
7 00 Ol N
Ol 00 V1 M M .-- I .-- I
N V I
i i rri C 3
O
W
C
N NC W
O
a`
d
f6 u
v c
7 a
C
v
C d C p
Q 10 Y C
N ' O. N O u
v
c_ Q t,
o m a ° v a o ,
y
m
N L v c N
o a ,., u
u
n
y9 ' X W O V
C O X U! C N O V
N v y
J
G C
fC fO O1 N C E v
O N ai " >
fO :
a- o o x o r v - w : no N c " '° ,- c a
W C' N w
N ' `
1 d
y
N C . v
u u V T C X
N
O/ O. U1 O O. W
n w w ¢ '. y a m Y — a v v v
a@ „ io , v E — u a v
v
v Y v
Q1
v o oc
v
v ° v c ` v
u N o `-' c - o fl-.° c w W 01
v i o m w a °' o ° 1 r c y > ' on n10o ao >. v o
a a, a a", c ' S ' o_ a
c
a
C = u i v i y in Q d O a
L =
0 X w > a u a w O `- ¢ O d a m in m w u O v LL LL C W
C- 10
316
x
X
O
ti
O
NM
N
i
O
n a
N
N V 0 -- i R I N 00 00 N O 00 Ol V I V N lf7 1 ln I O N i 00 M l O tfl V O V I tD tY7 01 .-- I N l0 I N N P/ 1 N . N 00 N O N M O V V ' ' 01 Ol N V7 lD V d' O I lD .- i m O Ol lD V N l0 ' t+ l O 01 V N N Ql 00 01 V lfl N V O 1 Ol V 00 V Pn N-- I N 00 t' 1 a O f N .- y O Q V .- i O tD V n' 1 .-- 1 .-- i M c- 1 V1 O I N '- i O M '- 1 .- i a0 M L! 1 O
I N M V1 QJ
a a
V 00 rl Q I N 00 00 N O 00 Q1 V I V N V1 I tl1 I O N I 00 m 3 O tl1 V O V I lD M 01 -- N l0 I N N tY1 N .- V N 00 N O N M y
O V t7 ' ' 01 Ol V N 1A O V V O I lD .- 1 m O Ol l0 V N lD M O O1 v O
N 01 00 01 ln N O I Ql V o0 V P 7 N.-- N 00 M V c
J N .-- i O i O lD V m . ti . ti M e- f D C
I N .--I O n' 1 .-- i .-- I o0 n' 1 Lrl a „ 0
I N n' 1 V1
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i a
o
m
N
N O lD M OO O Ol Ol 00 D rl N O1 00 m m tl7 Lf1 O I V N N lD O O V lD 00 00 O O o0 V1 O N l0 ln .- 01 rn l0 .-- 1 O Ol .- I O n' 1 N D a N O N V1 01 -- 1 N lD Lfl M 00 lD O N O Ol u] V N ' ' ' ' ' Qt ' O Ol 1 00 l' 1 ll1 tD V N 01 N Ol lD 00 n' 1 00 M N.-- I O Ol l0 V1 a0 .- 1 O O M .- i Ol lD M M - 1 ti N O M O
l0 N .-- i O M .-- I n' 1 N M
y N M V1 i
O lD M OG O Ql Ql 00 lD .- i N 01 00 M M ll1 Vl O I V N N lD O O y V tD o0 00 O O o0 V1 O N D ul .-- O Pn l0 .- O 01 .- I Ol n' 1 N l0 " N O N V1 01 - 1 N lD lf) M 00 lD ln V O N O Ol ll1 V N ' ' ' ' ' Ol ' O Ql 1 0 4--
a0 M ll1 l0 V N 01 N Ol tD 00 l+'1 00 V n' 1 N .-- i O Ql l0 V1 o O
t D N O /' 1 .- 1
O lD m m .-- .-- i O M o
lD
i N tT1 Vf^' 4J
d
a
E
N
N I O D RI l0 R I n' 1 lD m m .- I O N Lf1 Q1 L! 1 V O N V V N ti M N M l0 .-- I rl V V Ql t' 1 I. fl lD .-- I l0 1 lD V Ol 00 I 00 O lD i M 00 N _ I 00 N N r1 00 M 00 t+' 1 N t+ 1 N N f11 Qt .- 1 01 00 tl1 V N ' ' ' ' ' D ' O N N .

N V1 tD N R ln 00 tO O 00 Vl 00 M 00 V N N N O-- rl
7 Ill O O O N O Ol lD m m - 1 .- 1 I O N Vf
rv .- i m m m in .+ LL
i ri m vi v
n o m o v r m m . o n n m n v o r v n . m Q m v v m m n io o n v m oo ao o m oo e i 00 N ' N .-- I 00 M 00 M N M N N t+') Ql -- I Ol 00 L! 1 ct N ' ' ' ' ' tD ' O N N .+ ll1 lD N L! 1 00 1p O 00 ln 00 00 V N N N O ti N
l 0 N Ot n' 1
O Ot l0 m m O
u
rl tv1 V1
O
N
C
N
C
NI
00O
d
N
u
R
v c
10 c cv,
v v o
v
Q m
N '
m o. v o
u 1 c
Q y,
O f6 y„
p
C
O d
0 N
Y
N
N C
V
C
N
7 C N Y N
O.

N ' O N +' v U G C
y
LL C
h
y 7 - O
N `
u O C N C
3 N d
O U u
GJ y > y
J
p a+
x C C
y .— pp
V
v
Ol N C
O OJ N C C E V _ : 1.

F t' Ol F' > C fl. C -
p O O L N ~ a C ' O
p ` N
H C 7 ' ta a+ C
a
y 7 W Q Y+ ` 1 U1
a+
G1 ro ! o
u >, u C X
O C '
U1 O. G/ O d W

C N N N
p y., _
in 7

E N ' V
N p,
l ' O
v r C y .

Ul IO 1' C Ul GJ C Q £ V N
a+ y
u
y ' - p a Y C Ul W L
v i y
10 10 01 f0 O y•
L
N Y C U) N O O = Q > > >
L C d C O. C
o N H N y Q a` O a
o X w > a U a w O H ¢ a a m a m o c w u o v LLLL r a
C- 11 317
k
k
O
ti
O
N
O
v
a0
o a
m
N uiooio m mo .-+ r nmom vmr mr io o mao o
oom o mooinrv nm oo n vv .- n no r o ao
voov n m . nvooNminovin ., o vm o oom n v
N I Oi o0 V1 l0 l0. ti O ct O .-- i V7 01 l! 1 M N. ti. ti o0 1 V - I O J N n' 1 .- 1 00 I N .--I I N .-- 1 00 V O P L
00 N .- 1 i M .- i .-- 1 1 M l0 01 I
i N V V1 Gl
a
O
inoo o m mo .-+ r uimomn vrnrvmrv o moo 03
oom o moouirv mm oo n .- vv .-, o cvo ma v
voov n m . nvoor m nov n . o ovm o oom o
I Qi o0 V1 lD lD.-- i O V O . ti Vl Oi Vi n' 1 N- i.- i o0 1 " J N n' 1 -- i 00 I N .--i I V V N .- 1 00 V O I C
00 N .-- I rl M .-- I .-- I 1 M lD O1 N
0 I N V u1 Q
a
W
M
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i _
N
N t' 1 P/ 1 I. l7 N V ll1 lD 00 O Q1 N lf1 00 Ol tl7 V1 Ol V N M 1 Q1 N h 1 v t N V a ul O 01 l0 1 00 .-- N O O .- 1 I O o0 VI tA 41 N Ol O V y tl7 00 O ' ' a01 ln V V .-- 1 l0 lD Ql M Ol M .-- I Ol l0 V N O ' lD I I NU i N lf1 01 I. fl N 00 00 t+ 1 Ql O V Ql V t' 1 N c- I lD 1 l0 I Ql cYl .- i M l0 N O O V M N -- I l0 n' 1 00 01
h N ri rl tn .- i .- i O M ll1 I
ti N V Vf r
m m V1 N l! 7 lD 00 O 01 N ln 00 Ol Ll1 L! 1 Ql N M h Ql N I I r v nomio oo .-, r. ioo ', n000in nm r mo a LL
ll1 W O ' ' Qt ll1 V V .--1 lD lD O1 M Ol M V .-- I 01 lD V N O ' l0 I I o 1 1 N V1 Q1 V1 N 00 00 M 01 O
O V 01 V t' 1 N.-- 1 l0 I lD I p
J 01 ln .-- 1 M l0 N O O ' 1 N -- i l0 n' 1 00 01 ry
h N .- i r1 m .- .- 1 O m V1 I a
1 N V V1"' N
d
a
o
C
E
N
N I. fl N C e- 1 ll1 lD lD V N M .- 1 .- I I lD 00 N I ll1 /' 1 O 00 1 I 00 N N vvm oo mmmn . m . rnm . o . on nmvoo o in .- m vo . r rnmvrn novonrvvom vry , io ao oo .

N v vi oo vi,- i ao o v ai v m r i.- i ai o0
7 Lfl N .-- I 01 LIl .-- I O lD V M N .- 1 N lD N
1 N -- i O M .-- i -- i Ol M V1 l0 LL
1 N P! 1 Il1 a
lf1 N V rl Vl l0 l0 V N M .-- I .-- I I lD 00 N I V1 M O OO I 1 Oc0 rl Q V V Ol 00 Ol M m h r+ 1 Ol tv1 lD O 1 ul m V o0 O trl 00 V O O ' ' .- I N Ol m V 01 t! 1 O V O 1 N V O Ol l0 V N ' ' ' ' ' O ' oo l0 00 , D lD.-- 1 Q Vl 00 V1 tD 00 O V Ql V M N a-- 1 1 1 Ol 00 7 ln N ti Ol Vl . O lD V n' 1 N -- V N lD N .

I N c- 1 O M e- 1 '- I 01 tY1 V1 lG
i N n' 1 VI
O
N
K
N
C
N
a`
d
f6 u
v c
Q
c
ai
f0 v.
v o
c y
Q m
o. v o
e u
N C
v c fl'
O o y
p
C
O 7 -
O n
N C 7J C
G
7 N O. j
a+ U r+ 01
w ^ tyCO ' X Gl O H
C
O`
X N C N d
O v
UJ ` Y
J
i
G C
H C
C
v
F
0 C 41 ' > O. C O xa O L U1 ~ O. C wl ' Op N n
C 7 t6 + C
S
n
w z
w y ¢ E '- v °' > « '
a°' i ;,
a'
u >
c L' v " o c ;, v
n , m °
v
p' a
a
v
v
u ' y v °/ v o oc
v °' — v a i c ` °' E u u '-' o
Y
e " - o n; 9 c v W v
Gl N •` p
C
vi
o r c
C
j 'uo e o on >' o > > n
j
a 4 c uui c ' ' o. c
6 0 0 N m N Ol C
J
N N O O U' c > > N J fa O. O O1 Q to N
d — 0 Q
N N N y VI Q d C O d
0 X
J W d 6.' V C d W O G F Q d d O7 Vl m C W U Q
G`l
H 2 ii ii F W H 4
C- 12
318
San Joaquin Area Floocl Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX D:

OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REVENUE ANALYSIS

SUPPORTING TABLES
Table D- 1 Cash Flow Modeling of Overlay Assessment in Conjunction with Development Projections D- 1
Table D- 2 Marginal Change in Overlay Assessment Per Acre of Development....................... D- 5 LWA

IARSEN WURZEI
r/ 55oCiqteS, nc.
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 0118. docx 319
00N
mu-, o ,., M V O
C N( O
WN O ~
m ni
y [
rm
o
R
NM
WN f0 p
M
C
N
N
N
N
CLm
N cM' l
MV
H
O cD
b
n
m
1=
N (
O
N t0 OD N(")
O
D
ti
O
0 O
NN
V
N In
N
M
J
y
N 69 69
N yMj,
oO
Vy
O
N
O
i
M V ^ VO i(O
p
N
y cV cD
N
Q Oi fV vi pp
N
CO( V( O ^
O N(`
d
bO
V I
N
NN ln
N Ifi v`
N
T
b9
H
N
NCm c¢
N V• Nn
7 ryVj
O
1 N[' V .
j
V M ^
Y O.

M I V ( O
T O (O
pbj ti
jvi
p . ti Ci u'
i
p
N
da
N
N
pQ
v 1.

N
y ac0idE
a
or nnv
o
N
ya
N
oa
N
n< ooQ Q,
m aovp oi
r o
M
t0 cO c
p
M tVO
b yj
N
O N
O c0 N
p
1O
p ei
N
M N!
y` '
1 2N
N
h
NN
O
ON
CN') V
y
j
WNN Vf
N
NNN
rO ooO pjON Q
1 m
I(O N
y
f(") fD Wj C .

N
N
m
N
OO cO ^
p
jo
p
O f")
MW yj ^ I d
f0
N
N h
CH
a E
Nw
N inmmM
r corn
p
c moa mcvco
y
a'i ym
o
n co r- er aoom n
m cD N O p
N(D
p pp l0 y
uf N m
NM c
m
p O1
N N( O ' y`
O
paN
N
N
V! 6p9 V3
y,
H
m T C
O
f0 a'
L. {
N
p
V
p
N
C
N
N
O N
V W
N y~j C ' L-'
d
a ^ o
b
aa
b
N .-- ry
j
a0 c7O N /
1 o
m
c i<nn o ° E. t.. y
N rn E
ry f0
N
U
N tA tA tA. I N
CQO
M 1 OMO
D
E
m I 00 I M N(
D c`] ti
N
NNOE
rn
cococfDo
o a,
io
inin
m m «
p
n C(
V
p^p`
N
N
N uA
NN m
d
C
U
C
O U o
aa
a N D
N
m
NM
c o
O ODN N ^
b
N
a
N
N ryqj (
DN I
b N1
p jc
O LO In rn t0 d' UI
T
y '
N
i»»"»
v~i
cEa
n
E N ' >
O y (
0Td
c]
V
O i ^
O
OO
pti w
N
m
m
N N ( fl f9 fA
anNN ry m° w
3 N
C UJ l0N
in
O 01 QOUQ
O --
j,,, Z .

N C7V
L
C OJ a u° m c
u
w
a
y
E
E
N
i v
N
N
U
y
J
T
f0
C
d
Q
G!
p
W
E = a'
d
i udi
C
Q
H
C
W
N 7 O
E CC C Q t
C C
C
U
d
Q
9 O
d m
Q
O y
G C .

C
F udi W ' U
O t
V
N
C
d
3 a,
3 Q
o
y Y' a + y m'
m
010 °
y
E n- o$ EHa '°
a
m
N
c E' mo
N
m
A c
U
p
f0 U
w
m
Fu
a v f
n
Z
a
320
000
f") f0
p 1 f0
N V1
O
M
V
N 4'
N N
O
i
N IV ~
N
a
N
fnn
N0
p
N1 tV M w
N
N
C
O c0 h N O
O
1 N(`')
V M N
N
f1 1
N ti
N b ^ N
N
g0
ro
O (o n N
Ob I tV M N Q I
0^0
O tD
ey
N 1
O
a
N O1
N ro
N
m
v
N ni
y
NN
cNE
Qx
N
rNO
Op
N
n
n
C
N r um]7C q O.
i ri
v in
b
oa
o
N rn r
v y¢
ry
N
fA 69
v1
N NTpN N
Q
N
N N pqj N N
b
N
H
N
O OD nj I N lC
E
a
M
N N
p 1i0 r ^
M
O
1 O
O
V O) pp`
b
ry Nitfl
Ya
MN
N
EN O E
NNN
b Cm]
N
CJ
O
7 OO
Q
1 I Oi
Q
N
j
NN N
p
W
1 ry1 y , O/
m
e
rlM
N
Y1 a'
m
V
aj
b
C
N u» N N E a E N E a y y N
tn O
M
W
O ybj
p
p
NmN
c`
7N
M
u](
O O)
M
O
CmN
m 00(
O a
NHN
n
n
o cf
m
t.
m
N EA
N Vi
M M1 N O'
O

H N N V
a
L
N
C -"
y
C3 y
o rnrnmQ ma „ .
o
o
m n ,. c000 o
a
T
a
V
N
M
o
n rn ai E
c
ti
n
co
v v n d a
o in ao
v u Qo '^ oi
E
N
N
NN
CQO
Ud C >d
lfi W
M
N cDM
N
p j (0
OE
M
f C' l
1 LLr] M 1
o ai
T j jO o n "' a a v:
o
a
r i"
n
aoi "
y
N
y
K
NN m
c
a ma a a
N
OtW N
7 N
UNE
m
u] I
n aD ^ Qj
C
O
N u1 O
H
M(
O
Q lry yC f0
O
O Q(
ON p0
O
r' +'^
i`
f» f» in v'^i
cE o'c
E + '
j
ymEd
O O(O D 00
T
ONN p ch aD . by
N N
aCi
u
nn N
p
Q a:.'
E
m
v
v
n to Cp
p m=
h
M fR(
h
N
N Vf
M C >
VN
N
fA f9 y y
CN f0N
aoa
o -,
o
Z `.N o? v,
c
c u
w
ya
c
y
Cy
v
a+
c
E
E
ca
E
a
N U V'
7 Q
u y ¢
m'
a
m
E o°'c
w >
c a '"
v
i ¢
N
cu
a
v
Q =
E
z
c
N
w
d
p
c
v
u
o
N
a
v
E
o
v m
Q
c c _
rn
o a
c
F
f
d
v
m
o r o
d
3 a,
3 o ` mm'' a , m'
m
C 10
a
Einv Einv $ '
0 a
W
LL
j
C E
M
O
m
E
J
N O ( Lj
d
o mU ` mU'
a
d
c
H
v
Q
a i. i
v
iZ
321
k
OONO
c0
O O
m O O pNj
O
D
pt I O
O
ri O O !.
j
Q
u,
a
pf» f»
g
N
W
ryj N '
1 c
y
N
lJ
N
t0O O bQ1O O ~ ^ 01 CO
N
a
1OO ri
N
N
y
p P i N N
1 N DOOO4
NOOO b OO p~j
b
noo oo ,. ++ N v»
uMi
a
p Q
N
H
N
cNQ
O
O O O O !
p
o
O
o
O
M
OV
y
WOO
p
Q
C
N
O

O O I O
O
ri ^
jN
N
y
00 4H fR p `
N2
1!1 n'
1 Q
N
N
h
N
h
N
T¢
y a
a000 000
om
M moo oo „`^ t- N O O O Q N O O nj N E
ti
Q
N a0 do O M
N
N
N
N o
00 O tD OON
N ry
E
WO C)
N
O
N
m
C
d O O( O ^ (
VO ryj
N
j
1 b
N fAN
Q tD d .

N
0 0
o r
M
o
O 00 N vj C N N N N E d y N
O ry j N
W O (D
Q
OON
N
p
N d
a
oJ O (7
N O ry p t0
yA
1 O O
N N
Q
C (0N
01 b
p f ^
N
d H p
O a0
NM
yj
0 c0 ` p_N
N
t?
N
N L `
O
N
O
U pi
OL
M
C -'"'
N
N
Np
c 3
c
m
ti rnoa°iN c°'oo
p
a' o=
a
T
m oco o i ^
E
n
a
u
e
N"'n
m
o a , r., y a`
N •
N r vi °
p
o,
E
H
N
N
aO
CV C
N
noa°i ,`^, o N , M.
moE
1 O cD p
1O
pp
0 NTdO
b
1 fA N pp T >
w
r
r
p
n a d «
N
P
N f`')
b
A
f9 N
lC..ON
H v~I.

N m
c
NU
d
O C] ti O
N
M
dciNE
D
O t0 p1 I O pj 1
N
N
p I fA
N
O1
NjOOy
a c
o
n
m
N
M
M Eo-'
n N
n c -
a> > '.

Ny =
N
mOM ti .— O N
N y
C
v' o °' »
c °° `
D
QE d
n
O
b
C') r
ON
pmm
ON
M ti
M C >
VN
n
n vs
aQ0UQ o .-.
d
Z . Nth7
c
c
w
d u°
d
z m
Cv
y
d
7 E
Ew
y
GI ydj
d
d
N
W
l
y
7 N
a
d
N
1 a" > p
G
Q
y 0 C
7 ` C
N
d
O
a O , 05
0 o
a
o
E
a10i
i
p
C
v
c
o
N a` '" a ' s E o m a"
o,
m
o
d
m
c m ' Q
a'+ '
m
o r o
v
3 u
3 0 , m ' a , m'
m
o °
a
E
y v
E
yv
o
A
w9r
c E
o
mo'
u
m °
A
c mU '°
U
o
m
u a f v
z
a
322
0NOOGCLLag00m
cNEQ
ao'vxc
dan
N¢N
T¢N
OO
OOOO
OOO
p
OOO
pb
H
Gt
OO O O
OO
O
41 E
O
fA tA tA
N
p
nNwO
O 47 N N
N
EO N
N £
O
OO
p
j
OOO
pb C
D
O O '
y
1n
OO uj
1 j
el
P
4! b9 Vf f d .

N
O
q N p a
N
C
N
N
E C~N
v, Eo
yyw
H N N
N
O O O
OO
p ti
N y
N
O O
y
U'
OO
yj
b
C p
N
N ^
O
P
M
MQ
y
m
o
a
0 N
0 C`
paN N N L T
O
O
C -'"'
N
C
p N
N
o rnooq o00o
N o
a
Ol
O O y O O uj
N
iC! fR E9
EN
O N y«
N
N
N
N C
QO
U
UCj
0o noo
t0 Ev
mooq 000po
mo
1tf
O O '
y
lnO O 41
N
T
O
fA fA
y
b T >
w
u00i
a
m
v
a a a...
p aD
N DO
p
N
t+f
M rn v
v
N N. C NV d
N
a
ri. 00e~, ooN
p
yc i dE
n
VOO
Q
NO
O N /
1 C «
y
N
O f9 f9 O
N
o
W
N C N
N
a? V1
C E°'> y
yc
HN mET y>
OO ti Or7 O O
M
Q
Np9c
a roo voo a:

E y °'
o
v
r e» ca m
Q n••
E
n
a
n
v
m o `—°
y
i v
i
u"i
N
N
d QOUQ
o .
o
2 .iv
c
a
o
ea
c
y
w
a
y
E
E
N
i m
N N U y N
Q
y
v C
cC ¢ C
d
E N . d n
v
O a '^
a,
v
o
E
0 U
C
N
Q
4 r
L
0 0
Q
E
0 C
C
p
H N
WU
l0
O L '
j
N
cO
3 1
N
3 O `
y
N
C
d V
N
C
C 00
0 a
N
yG
E N y
a
L
C O
N a.
m
O
a
N
O
V
A N
C
N
C
C 0..'
R
UC
j
y
N
F l/
Q
d N /
f
2 d
323
Table D- 2
Mossdale Tract Area: Overlay Asssessment Rate Analysis
Marginal Change in Overlay Assessment Per Acre of Development Assessment Assessment Marginal
Rate Per Rate Per Assessment
Developable Developed Rate Change
Acre Acre Per Acre
Overlay Assessment Land Use Category
a[ 1] s[ i] c= e- a
Vacant Commercial 77. 55 $ 263. 43 $ 185. 87
Vacant Industrial 43. 73 $ 526. 02 $ 482. 29
Vacant Residential 56. 17 $ 299. 61 $ 243. 44
Total 177. 45 $ 1, 089. 06 $ 911. 61
1] Based on preliminary Assessment rate Analysis prepared by Wilidan Financial Services.

Prepared by LWA
p 5
1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Model 2023 0110. x1sx
324
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Reporf Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX E:

EXECUTED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE

DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE MOSSDALE TRACT

AREA AS BETWEEN THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY AND

THE CITIES OF LATHROP, MANTECA, AND STOCKTON ( PARTIAL EXECUTION) MOU Memorandum of Understanding for Development of Additional Funding for the Mossdale Tract Area between SJAFCA and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca and Stockton...... E1 LWA
IARSEN WURZEt
la550CiateS,( nc.
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 0118. docx 325
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANllING

REGARDING THE DEVELOPNL NT OF ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES

FOR THE MOSSDALE TRACT AKEA AS BETWEEN THE
SAN JUAQUIN AREA FLO011 C NTROL AGENCY AND
THE CITIES OF LATIiROP, M1INTECA, AND STOCKTON
This Memorandum of Understanding( the" MOU") is entered into by a 1d between the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (" SJAF' CA"), the City of Lathrop (" Lathrop"), City of Manteca Manteca"), and the City of Stockton (" Stockton") ( three listed Cities referenced hereinafter collectively as" Participating Cities.") This MOU shall be effective upon execution by SJAFCA and the Participating Cities( tl e" Effective llate"}.

RECITALS
A. SJAFCA has beei designated as the Local Flood Management Agency(" LFMA") for the Mossdale Tract Area since 2018 and, consistent with Government Code 65007( a)( 5), prepared and issued reports on an annual basis to the Ce tral Valley Flood Protection Board regarding the efforts underway to achieve 200- year level of protection for tl e Mossdale Tract Area(" Adequate Progress Reports").

B. SJAFCA, as the LI'MA, continues to make significant progress toward 2QQ- year protection for the Mossdale Tract as detailed iil the Adequate Progress Reports(" Mossdale Tract Area Project"}.

C. SJAFCf1' s current financing plan reflected in each of the annual Adequate Progress Reports for the Mossdale Tract Area Project contemptates revenues from the followu g sources:

Early contributions from member agencies;
nhanced infrastructure financizig district( EIFD);
Development impact fee( DIF); and fi
o Overlay Assessment District( OAD).

CJ a,
D. rach of the first three elements of the financing plan have been implemented according to schedule. However, SJAFCA elected to delay the formation ofthe OAD from its current timeline of latc 2022/ 23 to late FY 2023/ 24 wilh the expectation that assessments can Vy ; commence being levied in FY 2024/ 25.

E. In addition, SJAFCA has been developing an alternative financing plan to ensure adequate a '
and complete funding for the Mossdale Tract Area Project. The most beneficial alternative O nancing plan requires a Federal feasibility study conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( IISACE) followed by Congressional authorization that can then result izi a significant infusion of Federa] funds to the basin. The Mossdale Tract is unique among urban areas in the Central Valley seeking significant increases in flood protection in that it is the only sucli urban basin which is not receiving Federa.l fiinds by partnering vith tl e USACE. The Parties agree that obtaining such Federal funds is a significant benefit to the region and the State and should be the Parties' highest priorities. r0 i
326
SJAFCA' s casl flow scenarios related to the Mossdale Tract Area Project indicate that it has adequate unds on hand to meet its cash flow demands through 2023. While the USACE is developing its feasibility study, and v hile SJAFCA works to form an OAD, the Parties have agreed to execute this MOU by which the articipating Agencies commit to ne otiate at d execute an agreeznent which will backstop any funding needs of SJAFCA that may exist after 2023 (" Advanced Funding Agreement") provided, however, that prior to providing such funds, the Participating Cities shall confiz m that they can provide the funds witl out znaterially harnning existing programs and the Participating Cities acknowledge that a failure to provide sueh funds may resutt in SJAFCA' s inability to take certain actions regarding the Mossdale Tract Area S' roject.

G. Subject to Section 10 of the " Amended Agreement for Collection of SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protectio n Development Impact Fee," it is the intention of the Parties to seek to use ' uture ; revenue sources ( e.g., OAD, EIFD, 17evelopment Impact, etc.) to reimburse any fundi:ng provided by the Participating C'ities under this MOU.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties k ereby agree as follows;

AGREEMENT

1. Commitment for an Advanced Funding Agreement. Parties agree to negotiate and then use good faith to considex execution of an Advanced Funding Agreennent during calendar year 2023 whereby Participating Cities shall agree to make suffieient funds available to SJAFCA to rr eet operational s ortfalls for the Mossdale Tract Area Project net of revenues from all other funding sources,

2. No Third-Party BeneCciaries. This MOU is intended solely £or the bene t of the Parries and shall not be construed to create any rights for any other person or entity.

3. Term. This MOU shall be effective upoza execution by the last ofthe Parties( the" Effective Date"). This MOU shall remain in effect from the Effective Date until such time as terminated by the written agreernent of all ofthe Parties.

4. Notices, Notices to the Parties shall be sufficient if delivered as follaws; For City of Lathrop,
City of Lathrop
ATTN: Teresa Vargas, City Clerk
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
327
For City of Manteca:

City of Manteca
A'1" I'N; City Clerk; City Engineer; City Manager' s Office iQUI W, Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
For City of Stockton:

City of Stockton Community Uevelopment Department
ATTN: Community Development Director
424 N. EI Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
For San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency:

San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
ATT' N: Executive Director
22 East Weber Avenue, Room # 301
Stockton, Ca 95202
iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates specified in the signature block below.
i
J
C[ TY OF LATHROP APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE C1TY

OF LATHROP CI' CY ATTORNEY
ay: BY. 1• 0 3
Stephen Salvatore, City Manager
Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney
T
CITY OF' MAN' fECA
Tatasa s, MMC
Govemmertt Services Qirscior
City Clerk.

By; Ciry of Lathrop
Toni Lundgren, Interim City Manager
328
For City of Manteca:

City of Manteca
ATTN: CiTy Clerk; City Engineer; City Manager' s Office 1001 W. Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
For City af Stockton:

City of Stockton Community Development Department
AT" Z' N; Community Development Director
424 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
For San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency:

San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
A'I"I'N: Executive Director
22 East Websr Avenue, Room# 3Q1
Stockton, Ca 95202
1N WT7' NESS WHERF, O, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates specified in the signature block below,

CITY OF LATHROP
T'TEST
Teresa Va s, MMC
y,
Qovemment Services Director
Stephen Salvatore, City Manager City Cletk
City of Lathrop
CI7'Y OF MANTECA
By,
Toni Lundgren, Interim City Maz ager
329
SAN JOf1QUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AG NCY
f
By. .

L'--` C-''-`"-
Chris Elias, Bxecutive Director
Approved as ta fonn:
i
C-X C "'._
S L. S o —
C
CI'TY S' rOCKTON

IIEIRR B K
CITY MEi ER
t1PPROVED AS TO FORM:

L ASIJNCION ------

CTTY ATT( RNEY
l
o
r
ti
ATTEST: p ; ' :

N . 4- ;
j„#
ELIZA R7A Rpox+'t

CIT' Y CLERK
ALTTI ORIZING ACTION:

I O2 - O(- Za-( - 2_.

I
i
330
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX F:

EIFD ANALYSIS SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Reference the
MOSSDALE TRACT ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT —

INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN FINAL REPORT
PREPARED BY ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.

DATED JUNE 2, 2022
Available on SJAFCA' s Website:
https:// www.sjafca. org/ home/ showpublisheddocument/ 1275/ 637902252871700000 Table F1 Updated EIFD& Financing Supporting Tables— Financing Revenues and Debt Service...................................................................................................................... F- 1 LWA

LARSEN WURZEI
1550GiOteS, nC.
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2023 0118. docx 331
X
y
O O O O O O O N V1 M O I N Ol Ol f1 N N c-I Ol Ol N V V r. V} L? t/? t/ T t/T t/? V} O 00 V1 M Q1 I tD Q i0 V1 V1 i0 O I 00 O Q Q X rv1 00 rv' 1 .-- i i0 00 tn t0 V1 u" u"1 N V1 i0 O I M
p
N 7 Vl 00 U' 1 O .-- i L!" 1 l0 01 l0 fr1 00 Ol l0 iJ" 1 N 00 00 l0 V O Q 00 .- i 00 N D N O O N O 00 01 00 00 N
a
y+
Ql Ql 00 Q1 00 M N N N l0 O .-- 1 L! 1 00 .-- I 1 O V
V
c- I N n' 1 V M tl1 e- i e-- I N c- 1 .-- I e- 1 N N N M c' 1 M O v+ n v v v v v v v+ n v v. n v v v. n v N
n T N
W tc a
C d
O Z
rnc
Y Q
O O O O O O O O O O o0 O O O O O O N i0 N M O N U
V} t/? V} V? VT VT V} VT O u' 1 N ' 1 O O O O O O M 00 f'1 M lD .-- 1 C O N v1 M O O O O O O N Ql / 1 N Q1 - i 00 Q
T
11 .-- i .--i u'i O O O O O O M' M 1 N' Oi c- i tD C
N
y a
M N t.r1 O O / 1 / 1 f1 v1 l1 l1 i11 v1 v1 lD D D I 1 LL. 41 lD l0 lD l0 a-- I a- i c- I a- i a- i c- I a- i .-i a- i i--I c- 1 `-- I e-- I i--I r G! O N N i/A t/ D i/D i/1 LT i/?L?i/A t! i/ 1 L? t/ D t/? t/} V? L? N ` V? i/?
N d y
Ia t a
Q Z
d
o
O O O O O O O O O O O O N l0 O N .-- i N N N N N N N N N V? V} i/T V? i/ V} LF i/?t/ LF i/}i/} M l0 l0 l0 N N N N N N N N N N c i rn m r r o
ao ri cri o v ao 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
y
m m m m N .-+ .-- i c-+ , o
a n n n n n ui ui ui u u ui ui ui u ao
41 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N
0 Q
W L
wO
O O O O O O O O O O u"1 iD iD O Vl Ql ct -- I V u) 00 O Ql 00 V} t/ T t/? t/} i/T t/ L} t/} VT/} M 00 00 O Ql lfl Ql N O V lD tl' 1 f/1 00 O 00 w (,,) N .-- I L! 1 Ql M Ql lD M N CY f' 1 N M
lD Ol c- I 00 l0 V N O l0 V O tf1 N 00 l0 N
I Ql 00 O M l0 Ql N ct i O N Lf1 1 O K1
7 d O O / 1 tD D l0 lD 1 I I 00 a0 00 00 01 Q1
y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
VT V Vf V} V} V? VT V} t/ T LT VT</? t/ T VT LT t/ D
N
d
N Q O
Q
w
N
O O O O O O O O O O v1 D 00 00 O o0 O l0 lD a0 l0 O M O V
i/} L? V} i/} i/} t/? VT S/ T t/T 4/? ( n 00 i--I lD lf1 c- 1 N N l0 00 I l0 O fn e- I N - 1 N lD I N lD - I fr7 O Ol c-I c-I 01 c-I
i l0 Ol O N O 1 Q1 V1 M Ol M - 1 I c- I
I Ql N I 41 c- I (' r7 l0 Ol a-- 1 I Q1 N V1
j O O a-- I i- I c-I c-I N N N N M M M M
a+ N N lf1 Ll'1 ll1 U' 1 L! 1 V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 Lfl iJ" 1 tf'1 V1 i/ 1 i/T{/? i/A iJ} t/? i/ V? t/ L} VT V} i/} L} t/? t/T 0 v i v i oo`orn `° O m oQ1000 mmo o m .-"+ w p M 00 f1 Ql c- I c- I N ci M I N lD Q I 00 .- I Ol N 01 vyi ayi ' =
vi cri o o ai o ri o 00 m ,- i oo v v c» ,- i
O
V C. 1 O N M 00 00 Ql Vl Vl V1 I c-I l0 U' 1 N 00 M V1 00 V1 d c m in n n n n n n m v u m m in o m in o
7 ai c
v v`i vOOi vQ1i v1Oi v`Di vi vOi v`Oi vOOi c 0ir vOOi v'i d ii v
0 a yd
y
o0000oo .-+ N nmornoov . o vvm .-- v
L? VF i/ t/} L L} V} O 00 11' 1 M N ! Y) N lD Ql 1 I 00 N O c- I N c-i c- I n N O . f'/ 1 00 f'/ 1 ci t0 V1 M l0 Ql N N Ol N 00 V 00 V N c- I i ~ fA LL1 C
v1 00 l1 O c- i O m l0 a0 I I V1 M r-i D I r1 m
Op Q O Ol 00 -- i 00 O O i0 M N t0 N D O O O
o
c LL
y ,
mrnaornooa000 n om om m
a
w i i cn' v vi m' v v ni v v v vi vi vi ui
GJ O. y
Fm
t/} V? t/ f t/ t/ V} L} V} VT t/} i/? t/? t/ L} t/? t/} V VT G' +-
7 d m p d , o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o n rn v m m n o v rn rn C C „
a
F, p
t/ T V L? V th VL VI t/ O / 1 iD t o0 0 01 u' 1 Q1 N m N .-- Ol 1 .-- Ql

Q ' U C
a m O N I V1 V1 Ol ' ch M 01 lD lD Ql M U"1 O I
N
C
p N y j V1 e- i I t .--i a0 t0 V N O Oi 00 I I I I 00 a0 N i11 1 O m u' 1 00 .-- I 01 N / 1 00 .-- I O
o a+ vi cg o 00000000rno, m000
N 1 a tq N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ni n i M M
01 y N d Q a i Q
t/} L? t/ t t/? t/? t/T VT VT t/ 1 t/ t/ 1 t/ f t/) t/) VT VT V? V1 ai Q .' o m y
J
H oC
W
I ' C
ON lD 1 00 Ql O r- N cr1 V V1 t0 I a0 Ol O •- i N M u" l0 I a0 Q1 O - 1 7 a- 1 i- 1 ri ci N N N N N N N N N N C/ 1 M M M M m m (' 1 M M p ' a f0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a C ? LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N G
F- 1
332
Lf1 N 00 O c- I I O M V f' 1 N V N 00 00 00 N l0 N
O lD N O N d I c- I O 00 N ch u1 1 lD d rv' 1 QO X
1 Ol N O O Ol m C' C M n a0 u' 1 tD lD C 1 V N Y O
y lD c- i c- i O o0 M N o0 O Ol Vl tD I O I Ol Ol a0 p
lL q
v1 O D tfl c- I Ql I V1 v1 V v1 D lD N lD Ol cn 00 V 0 a+ y •+ I r-I V Ql e- I N 7 lD 00 O N cI' I d lD 00 - 1 M lD O O L S C) fvl V ct ei -- I ei i--I N N N N Il ll fl lD lD lD ^ s O vT t/f t/ t t/ t t/ vf t/ t vt a/ T v?vT t/ t vt t/ 1 t/) vt a/ T Lt NO n
LL T
r• V1 pp N
W a
N
C a a
O
a'
Z p o^o
ri
M O lD Ol N O I lD Ol N V1 J1 O V c-I l!' I N 00 ^ O N rl O rl u1 00 00 tD rl O 00 V tD D 00 D u1 U
p
7 oov vrn m .- i c o n ,- uin +° m
v vi oo io ri t n oi rri oi n .-i o ri .-i p ri oo ui C o c N
ya H 000000rnm000 , Nm n . voo n o ii
6> i--I c- I c- I i--I -- I N N N N N N N e- I Vl l0 lD lD 1 I M O
t1 V} V? t/? i/} L} i/) L? i/} i/ i/} L} i/} i/ i/} i/T i/} M M f' 1 v `- in t in N o
N y y
a =
a Z >
a
0 N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O
N
N N N N N N N N N N N N t/T V? t/} i/?t/ T L? u1 QJ
47 , j
I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 rl
a.+ O
S 00 W W 00 00 00 00 00 OO 00 00 00 / 1 O1
c- I i--I e-- I e- i e- 1 e- I c- I i--I c- I -- I c- I i--I c' rl d N Ul lll Lll Ul LJl l!l Ll1 lll I./l l! 1 V1 l! 1 1 Op

C) N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Q' Q
t/ LF V? t/ t/ VF V? t/ ih V V} L i/}
0 Q O NQ1
W
L
o v n
v cri
v
v m000m oorn voomo n0000 ,
y
V tD 00 N lD O lD Ol Ol 00 I N O O I l' 1 L? L} V? i n '- V
O 00 N Ql a-- I M Ql M OO lD 00 r-I 00 l0 c- I 0 N " O
V1 v1 00 Ol V1 i11 tD lD i' O .-- 00 u" I Ol j
7 N
d a> noo . m mc noo v oommrn cn - o
d rn m o 0 0 0 .-i N N ni m m m rn v
Ul N N N M f'/ 1 M M M f' 1 M M M M M N N N N U1 C
L? L? t/ V} L} V? t/ V} VT L?V} V} VT V} VT t/} O N N
U/ Q O
Q j N
a
w v a
co
LL
D O n m O u1 O O O t0 O o0 O n O O O O M w
V
l0 00 O V 01 N 00 N N O Ql lfl ct O I Vl i/ T t/ VT ^
I i/ 1 O .-- i D 00 O I O M tf1 N o0 tD 1 to
n O m u^"1 W .- M- O m L i1 O i N Oi O^1 Oi N ta o
j
d' L! 1 Lr1 Lf1 lr1 l0 l0 lD I I i I W Ql Ol Ql 1 p N
a+ tl1 U' 1 U' 1 u' 1 l! 1 Lf1 tl'1 V1 tf1 V1 V1 V1 I). N N N C p s,, i/T V}{/} V} i/T t/? i/?V} i/} i/} L} i/}{/ T t/} V} i/T M + Q
S vC
L V O 01 N N Ql CF fh U" 1 1 ci l0 I 01 M V E
p
c- 1 I V V1 N N cY - 1 I U"1 ('/ 1 N O N 01 I .-- 1 N O N O w p Of c' r1 Ql Ol I V1 00 I e1 N V M c- I O 00 Ol .-- I O O () y .+ L! 1 c- I N (' r1 c- I M Ql N N I O c-I Ql N a-- I' 00 V N
C7 V 01 00 O O rl N t D O 00 V O lD N O O -_
O 01 C 1 .-- I Ql c- i M vl I O N I O N tl1 00 rl O1 110 C7 N • O C 01 01 O l0 l0 I I I I 00 00 00 00 Q1 Ql Q1 T O O H p ^ a
v v. n v v vr v n n in in in in v n n
t i v M r I
0 V1 Y
d
y
I ct O N c'/ 1 Ol N u"1 l0 V1 l0 00 N 00 00 00 N l0 C V? N 00 V1 N V lD Ol f' 1 N O L! 1 Ql I l0 fY1 tT vf
iA fA O >. V l0 Ol 1 a-- 1
f0 I l0 O a- i N O N Ql ll"1 l0 l0 M N M
fA = W C V1 O Ql 00 I c- I .- 1 1 01 00 c- I' I O I Q1 Q1 00 tp O n i f/ 1 I N I lD n' 1 c- I 01 I l0 l0 I 00 O N lD Ql n'1 00 V ^ O V LO LL N lD Ql lD 00 Ql r-I K1 ll1 I 01 N lD 00 c- I fv' 1 l0 C L W > D O D M m m m V V u'1 u'1 n n tD D D + 1
a N
V? i/} V? t? V}{/} i/} i/T i/? i/} t/? i/} i/ LF i/T t/? L} L? i/} 0 Q 3 N LL Gl 00 C 6f N I l0 Ol Ol Ol M M 00 00 Ql P/ 1 M 01 ri V1 N 00 } +' W
p C '
O
m 00 00 Ql N I u'1 u' 1 00 00 I O 00 rl .- t0 00 tD ^
Q ' j a cp 00 N 01 O M O O f' 1 O O M O .- 1 N M 1 Ln I v1 N
C y y y pj c-I N tf'1 I O M lD O Y 00 M 00 M Q1 Lf1 .-- I' 00 V1 N , N
f0 p o
p . h m I O m tD O M l0 O m lD O m 1 O 00 .-- u'1 ' 1
i
G! fp C
g -- I c- I N N N M lYI M V' ct J1 J"1 J"1 l0 lD D I I 0 N li Q y y . ip fY1 fY1 M f' 1 fv1 KI M M M M fY1 M M KI n'1 f'/ 1 n'1 ('/ 1 M lD Q C y d Q' Q
u
G '(! A V?' VA V? i/} V? ih V} i/} V? t/ T Vl V? L? i/}' V? i/ V} V} C pN y W G) a Q 1 N 7
to 9
p
N a' v ai lA > n
J
L y QJ L Q Q N y N
H d' 7 I h Q OC T
W V
1 ' C t0 i O
N M L/ 1 lD I 00 Ol O ei N M V U' 1 l0 I 00 Ql O v i
A v v v v v a v a n ui u ui u ui u n vi n o
rp a +
m
d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. C ? LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N G u a
F- 2
333

ATTACHMENT

SAN JOA UIN AREA
FLOOD CQNTR4L AGENCY
January 31, 2023
Ms. Sarah C. Backus, Executive O cer( Interim)
Central Vailey Flood Protection Board
P. O. Box 942836
Sacramento, CA 94236
Via electronic mail: Sarah. Backus( cr. cvtlood. ca. qov Re: 2022 Annual Report of Adequate Progress toward Urban Level af Flood Protection for the Mossdale Tract Area( Reclamation District No. 17)
Dear Ms. Backus:

Senate Bill 5( SB5), and related companion bills, created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the Califomia's Central Valley. Prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for nonresidential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions( building peRnits) for new residential buildings in urban or urbanizing area, land use agencies are required to make a finding reEated to the provision of an Urban Level Flood Protection( ULOPj. Further, to ensure that these findings remain valid, the Local Flood Management Agency( LFMA) is required to annually report to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board( the Board) on the adequate progress being made toward ULOP.

As part of the reorganization of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency( SJAFCA} that took place in January 2018, SJAFCA assumed the role of LFMA for the Mossdale Tract Area. This is SJAFCA' s fifth year fulfilling the annual requirement to report on adequate progress toward ULOP for the Mossdale Trac# Area. With this letter, SJAFCA respectfully transmits to the Board SJAFCA' s Mossdale Tract Program: 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Update for UL P Final Report dated January 24, 2023.

This report has been made publicly available and can be found on SJAFCA' s website at https:// www. siafca. com/ recent documents archive. php Please do not hesitate to contact me ff you have any questions regarding our progress toward achieving ULOP for the Area.

Sincerely,
hris Elias
Executive Director, SJAFCA
Enclasure: Mossdale Tract Program: 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Update far ULOP Final Repo t, January 24, 2023
CC: Michael King, Assistant City Manager, City of athrop( via e- mail) Kevin Jorgensen, Deputy Director, City of Manteca( via e-mail) Mel Lytle, Director of Municipal Utilities, City of Stockton ( via e- mail) Fritz Buchman, Director of Public Works, San Joaquin County( via e-mail} CE: smw
22 E. Weber Avenue, Raom 301, Stockton, CA 95202- 2317
209) 937- 7900 ; www.sjafca. org
334
ITEM 4. 13

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
BOCKMON & WOODY CO., INC. FOR THE JOHNSON

FERRY ROAD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION, CIP PS
23- 04
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Accepting Public Improvements Constructed by Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. for the
Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation, CIP PS
23- 04, Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of
Performance and Payment Bonds
CEQA STATUS: The project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19, §
15301 Class 1 Existing Facilities"
SUMMARY:

Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. ( Bockmon & Woody) has completed the improvements of the Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 23- 04 Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation. Staff inspected the installation and the improvements have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer. A project location map is included as Attachment C.

Bockmon & Woody submitted lien releases confirming all sub- contractors and suppliers have been paid in full and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.

Staff requests City Council accept the improvements constructed by Bockmon & Woody for the Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation, CIP PS 23- 04. Staff also requests City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Bockmon & Woody for 3, 187. 50 within forty-five (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.

Sufficient funds have been allocated in FY 22/ 23.

BACKG ROU N D:

City staff received numerous complaints from residents about limited street lighting on Johnson Ferry Road. A photometric analysis was conducted along Johnson Ferry Road and identified the need for three ( 3) additional streetlights. City Council approved the creation of CIP PS 23- 04 on September 12, 2022 and City staff prepared the plans and technical specifications.
335
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BOCKMON & WOODY CO., INC. FOR THE 70HNSON FERRY ROAD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION, CIP PS 23- 04
The informal bid solicitation package for the Johnson Ferry Streetlight Road Installation project was advertised on July 15, 2022, in accordance with Informal Bidding Procedures in CA PCC 22032 and LMC 3. 30. 060 and 3. 30. 070.

The scope of work included the installation of three ( 3) 16' decorative poles with three ( 3) new LED decorative top fixtures that were previously purchased by the City, construction of pole foundations, sidewalk panel demolition and restoration, horizontal boring, conduit run and cable splicing from an existing street light circuit to the three new street lights. The total construction costs for this project were 63, 750.

Upon Council acceptance of the improvements and approval of this item, the performance bond ( Bond No. 070216778, $ 63, 750) and payment bond ( Bond No. 070216778, $ 63, 750) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond 070216778W, $ 6, 375). The one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year beginning with this acceptance due to any defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Bockmon & Woody has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.

Staff requests City Council accept the improvements constructed by Bockmon & Woody for the Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation. Staff also requests City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Bockmon & Woody for $ 3, 187. 50 within forty- five ( 45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds. Staff further requests that unused funds be transferred back into the Mossdale Landscape and Lighting Capital Replacement Fund 2610.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Bockmon & Woody completed the project pursuant to the contract documents dated September 12, 2022. Staff inspected the installation and the improvements have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.

If approved by Council, the performance bond ( Bond No. 070216778, $ 63, 750) and payment bond ( Bond No. 070216778, $ 63, 750) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 070216778W, $ 6, 375) upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Bockmon & Woody has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and work completed.
336
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BOCKMON & WOODY CO., INC. FOR THE JOHNSON FERRY ROAD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION, CIP PS 23- 04
CEQA STATUS:

The project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19, § 15301 Class 1 " Existing Facilities"
FISCAL IMPACT:

The final construction contract amount with Bockmon & Woody for CIP PS 23- 04 is for $ 63, 750. With the completion of this project, staff requests that unused funds be transferred back into the Mossdale Landscape and Lighting Capital Replacement Fund 2610. Sufficient funds have been allocated in the Mossdale Landscape and Lighting Fund ( 2580- 50- 64- 420- 33- 00) to cover the maintenance for FY 22/ 23 in the amount of $ 59 annually.

ATTACH M ENTS:

A. Resolution Accepting Public Improvements Constructed by Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. for the Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation, CIP PS 23- 04, Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Johnson Ferry Streetlight Installation ( CIP) PS 23- 04 C. Project Location
337
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BOCKMON & WOODY CO., INC. FOR THE JOHNSON FERRY ROAD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION, CIP PS 23- 04
APPROVALS:
nc../ 2 a-o
Carlos Carrillo Date
Management Analyst II
z- 0,2...3
Ken Reed Date
Senior Construction Manager
3v f?,0Z3
Brad ylor Date
City Engineer
3, z' Z3
To d Se astian Date
Director Parks, Recreation & Maintenance
i
L``? 1 3 i ) ao. 3
Cari Ja s Date
Finance irector
I • ZCe - Zoz3
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
i - z - zoZ
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
L• 1• Z?a
Ste en J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
338
RESOLUTION NO. 23 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BOCKMON & WOODY CO., INC.

FOR THE JOHNSON FERRY ROAD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION, CIP PS 23- 04, AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF

CONTRACT RETENTION, AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2022, City Council awarded a construction contract to Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc for the installation of 3 City provided streetlights on Johnson Ferry Rd. CIP PS 23- 04 ( Project) in the amount of $ 63, 750, and a 10% construction contingency of $ 6, 375 was authorized for staff to use as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consisted of installing three ( 3), 16' decorative poles with three ( 3) new LED decorative top fixtures purchased and provided by the city on Johnson Ferry Rd; and
WHEREAS, the Project scope included construction of pole foundations, sidewalk panel demolition and restoration, horizontal boring, conduit run and cable splicing from existing pull box to the three new street lights; and WHEREAS, Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. successfully completed the Project work at a total cost of $ 63, 750; and
WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements and has deemed them complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance bond ( Bond No. 070216778, $ 63, 750) and payment bond ( Bond No. 070216778) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 070216778W, $ 6, 375) upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, staff requests City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. for the Johnson Ferry Street Light Installation, CIP PS 23- 04; and
339
WHEREAS, staff also requests City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. in the amount of $ 3, 187. 50, within forty- five ( 45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds; and
WHEREAS, staff is requesting that any unused funds be transferred back into the Mossdale Landscape and Lighting Capital Replacement Fund 2610; and WHEREAS, the project is exempt according to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Article 19, § 15301 Class 1 " Existing Facilities".

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements constructed by Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. for the Johnson Ferry Road Streetlight Installation, CIP PS 23- 04 pursuant to the contract documents dated September 12, 2022; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk and the release of the contract retention to Bockmon & Woody Co., Inc. in the amount of $ 3, 187. 50, within forty- five ( 45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and authorizes the release of the performance and payment bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes that any unused funds be transferred back into the Mossdale Landscape and Lighting Capital Replacement Fund 2610.
340
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of February 2023, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 341

ATTACHMENT
M p

RECORDING REOUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment of recording fees( GC 11922)

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN:

1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:

NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
Citv of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)

2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co-owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set farth in the preceding paragraph.

3. That the nature of title or the stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co- owners is:

Project No. CIP PS 23- 04 Johnson Ferry Streetlight Installation Bockmon& Woody Electric Co. Inc.

4. That on the 12th day of September 2022 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.

5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Bockmon& Woody Electric Co., Inc.

6. That the name and address of the transferor is:

NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
Bockmon& Woody Electric Co., Inc. PO BOX 1018, Stockton CA 95201

7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the Citv of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:

Project No. CIP PS 23- 04 Johnson Ferry Streetlight Installation

CITY OF LATHROP
By:

Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

By:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
342

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated February 13, 2023 by Bockmon & Woody Electric Co., Inc., to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on February 13, 2023, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
343
T
wt' I°'
a ., .
h'
i , _ - ' ' ATTAC M ENT
x
r'
i "-
r
e '
a 7': t Ii i . i_ (7 •,.:- y
ed wx
r u.

U
4 C O
a .`_.
a
ti X .
a* 11 C
e
ti=°`, fyQ ,
M.
y
s
JR!
C ; io":. ri
d ii
a.
h . . . # d
q
u/ `'
k, e,
i::' .

K { a
4¢ i
i''
N
y
za ,,, e`" 9
n
F'
r
k..
tir`
s"
a kr ,.. i kr'
JJ ..
k ......
r.E d=.#0,° ...,
f.
s Aw
e—+
d >. .:
t'"; r:.,. .
x g. rs.
i. g 3`;
7 C i 1
ak.: + i
k
x i
iY
j
r
t ,
t ,"
i
v
s v) S
d
p
U
t 4
Q 4'
ri ,
a ... _.
y .
d..
s,
r :
s:- It ,
z.
z
i
x
a
a .
d a
w
r
Jam' l SL
C7'
MA. w,,
w
344
345
346
hra- n.., r ux w. x e. , ... v.,.,....,,.....-... reven.._ ` x:

ITEM 4. 14

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION TO PURCHASE
FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE VEHICLES, APPROVAL OF

VARIOUS AGREEMENTS FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ANDAPPROVALOF RELATED BUDGET

AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Ratifying City Manager Action to Purchase Three ( 3) 2022 Police Ford Utility
Interceptors from Downtown Ford of
Sacramento, Ratifying Purchase of one ( 1) 2023
Chevy Police Tahoe from Future Chevrolet,
Approving Change Order No. 3 with NextGen
Alpha Upfitting forthe Purchase and Installation
of Police Vehicle Equipment, Approving Change
Order No. 1 with Continental Collision for AutoBody Paint Service, and Approving Related Budget Amendment
CEQA STATUS: Not a Project as Defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines
SUMMARY:

The Lathrop Police Department maintains a fleet of Ford Interceptors and Chevy Tahoes for the Patrol Unit. In December 2022, one of the Patrol Ford Interceptors sustained significant damage from a traffic accident and requires replacement. The City is currently waiting on the insurance company to provide the amount the City will be reimbursed for the damaged vehicle. In order to ensure there are sufficient patrol vehicles forourofficers and due to the shortage and lack of availability of police vehicles, the Command Staff would like to replace the damaged vehicle as soon as possible. Separately, at the January 9, 2023 Council Meeting, Council approved funding for an additional three ( 3) vehicles to add to the Patrol Unit fleet in the amount of $ 215, 500. Staff recommends Council approve the purchase of the additional three ( 3) vehicles and one ( 1) replacement vehicle at the same time.

Pursuantto the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC) section 2. 36. 110, staff reached outto Folsom Ford and Winner Chevrolet, both have contracts with the State Office for Procurement Department of General Services. Neither Folsom Ford nor Winner Chevrolet had police vehicles in their inventory and all 2023 police vehicles were sold out. Ordering 2024 police vehicles will not begin until mid- summer this year, for delivery in 2024.
347
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE

VEHICLES, APPROVALOF VARIOUSAGREEMENTS FORTHE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AND APPROVAL OF RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
Pursuant to LMC 2. 36. 080( A)( 2), to efficiently and timely maintain essential public services, and understanding that police vehicles were needed as soon as possible to ensure the City had a sufficient number of police vehicles for new officers, staff solicited quotes from four additional dealerships and only received quotes from Downtown Ford of Sacramento and Future Chevrolet. On the emergency determination by Chief Bechler pursuant to LMC 2. 36. 080( A), the City Manager executed Purchase Order 2023- 356 in the amount of $ 149, 177. 51 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento for three ( 3) 2022 Police Interceptors and Purchase Order 2023- 360 in the amount of $ 59, 997. 70 with Future Chevrolet for one ( 1) Chevy Police Tahoe. The cost for each of the 2022 Police Interceptors of$ 45, 441 is comparable to that of the State contract price of $ 45, 813 fortheir 2022 police vehicles. The cost of 55, 037 for the 2023 Chevy Police Tahoe is $ 8, 747 more than the State contract price of $ 46, 290 for the 2021 Chevy Police Tahoe, which based on the current inflation of vehicle prices, which staff considered acceptable.

In addition, the new police vehicles will need to be outfitted with police equipment and painted to match the approved specifications of the Lathrop Police Department Patrol Unit fleet. The City currently has emergency contracts pursuant to LMC

2. 36. 080( A)( 2) with NextGen Alpha Upfitting ( NextGen) to purchase and install police equipment, and with Continental Collision ( Continental) to provide the Auto- Body Paint Services for the Lathrop Police Department. Change Order No. 3 with NextGen for the four vehicles will be for a not- to- exceed amount of$ 116, 797. Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision for the four vehicles will be for a not- to- exceed amount of $ 23, 360. Total cost for each vehicle is detailed below:

Vehicle Cost NextGen Continental Total Cost
Ford Interceptor 49, 726 28, 960 5, 790 84, 476
Replacement
Vehicle
Ford Interceptor 49, 726 28, 961 5, 790 84, 477
Ford Interceptor 49, 726 28, 961 5, 790 84, 477
Chev Tahoe 59, 998 29, 915 5, 990 95, 903
Staff recommends City Council ratify the City Manager' s actions approving Purchase Order 2023- 356 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento for $ 149, 177. 51 and Purchase Order 2023- 360 with Future Chevroletfor $ 59, 997. 70, approve Change Order No. 3 with NextGen Alpha Upfitting in the amount of $ 116, 797 for the purchase and installation of police equipment, approve Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision in the amount of $ 23, 360 forthe auto- body paint services, and approve a 348
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE

VEHICLES, APPROVAL OF VARIOUSAGREEMENTS FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AND APPROVAL OF RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
budget amendment of$ 84, 476 to be transferred from Capital Replacement Fund for the cost of the vehicle replacement as follows:

Increase - Settlement Revenue
1010- 40- 30- 271- 08- 00 84, 476
Decrease - Capital Replacement Reserves
1010- 243- 00- 00 84, 476
Increase - Vehicle
1010- 40- 30- 450- 30- 00 84, 476
In addition to the purchase of these four new vehicles, the police department is looking to aquire a vehicle for the SWAT Unit and a vehicle for the Community Services Supervisor. Once a vendor is identified forthese other additional vehicles, staff will bring that item back to Council for consideration.

BACKGROUND:

At the January 9, 2023 Council Meeting, Council approved an additional five ( 5) swom officer positions and funding of $ 215, 500 for the purchase of three ( 3) additional vehicles for the new positions. Separately, one of the Patrol Ford Interceptors sustained signi cant damage from a traffic accident in December last year and is currently out of service and will require replacement. The City is currently waiting on the insurance company to provide the amount the City will be reimbursed for the damaged vehicle. In orderto ensurethere are sufficient patrol vehiclesforourofficers and due to the shortage and lack of availability of police vehicles, the Command Staff would like to replace the damaged vehicle as soon as possible. Staff recommends Council approve the purchase of the additional three ( 3) vehicles and one ( 1) replacement vehicle at the same time.

The Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicle ( PIU) has been built specifically for law enforcement; therefore, the PIU vehicle was selected as the standard vehicle forthe new Lathrop Police Department. Staff reached out to Folsom Ford and Winner Chevrolet, of which both car dealerships have contracts with the State Office for Procurement Department of General Services, for Ford and Chevrolet police vehicles.

Neither Folsom Ford nor Winner Chevrolet had police vehicles in their current inventory and all 2023 Police Vehicles were sold out. Furthermore, ordering for 2024 police vehicles will not begin until mid- summerthis year, for delivery in 2024. Due to the lack of availability and shortage of police vehicles, staff solicited quotes from four other dealerships and was only able to secure quotes for three ( 3) new Police 349
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE

VEHICLES, APPROVAL OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AND APPROVAL OF RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
Interceptor Vehicles from Downtown Ford of Sacramento and one ( 1) Chevy Police Tahoe from Future Chevrolet in Sacramento.

The new police vehicles will need to be outfitted with police equipment and painted to match the approved specifications of the Lathrop Police Department fleet. The City currently has emergency contracts pursuant to LMC 2. 36. 080( A)( 2) with NextGen Alpha Upfitting ( NextGen) to purchase and install police equipment, and with Continental Collision ( Continental) to provide the Auto- Body Paint Services for the Lathrop Police Department Fleet. NextGen and Continental have already outfitted and painted the Police Department' s 16 Police Interceptor vehicles and are currently working on the police vehicles that were returned to the City from the San Joaquin County Sheriff' s Office.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

On January 13, 2023, City Council approved the addition of five ( 5) police positions to the Lathrop Police Department. To support those positions, three ( 3) new vehicles are needed. Separately, In December 2022, one of our patrol units sustained significantdamagedue to an accidentand will need to be replaced. Staff identified that there was an urgentan immediate need to secure such police vehicles in order to continue to efficiently and timely maintain essential public services. Staff recommends City Council ratify the City Manager' s actionsapproving Purchase Order 2023- 356 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento and Purchase Order 2023- 360 with Future Chevrolet, approve Change Order No. 3 with NextGen Alpha Upfitting, approve Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision, and approve the related budget amendment.

CEQA STATUS:

Staff has determined thatthe item is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is sufficient funds in the FY 22/ 23 budget to coverthe overage cost of$ 49, 357.

Total Costfor two Ford PIUs and one ChevyTahoe is $ 264, 857, minusthe $ 215, 500 budget approved by Council on January 9, 2023 for the purchase of the additional three ( 3) vehicles. A budget amendment of $ 84, 476 is needed and shall be transferred from Capital Replacement Fund for the cost of the vehicle replacement as follows:
350
r „
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 5
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE

VEHICLES, APPROVAL OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AND APPROVAL OF RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
Increase - Settlement Revenue
1010- 40- 30- 371- 08- 00 84, 476
Decrease - Capital Replacement Reserves
1010- 243- 00- 00 84, 476
Increase - Vehicle
1010- 40- 30- 450- 30- 00 84, 476
ATTACHMENTS:

A. A Resolution Ratifying City ManagerAction for Purchase of Three ( 3) 2022 Police Ford Utility Interceptors from Downtown Ford of Sacramento, Ratifying Purchase of one ( 1) 2023 Chevy Police Tahoe from Future Chevrolet, Approving Change Order No. 3 with NextGen Alpha Upfitting for the Purchase and Installation of Police Vehicle Equipment, Approving Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision for Auto- Body Paint Service, and Approving Related Budget Amendment
B. Purchase Order 2023- 356 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento C. Purchase Order 2023- 360 with Future Chevrolet
D. Change Order No. 3 with NextGen Alpha Upfitting
E. Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision
351
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 6
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
RATIFY CITY MANAGER ACTION FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ( 4) NEW POLICE

VEHICLES, APPROVAL OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS FOR THE LATHROP POLICE

DEPARTMENT, AND APPROVAL OF RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
APP L5:
z
Raymond Bechler Date
Police Chief
tc„ c j 2/ S Ze2
Cari James Date
Director of Finance
Igl
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Z •" 1, • " f
Step en J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
352
n w...... a F,,. „
RESOLUTION NO. 23 -

A RESOLUTION OF TH E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP RATIFYING CITY MANAGER ACTION TO PURCHASE THREE ( 3) 2022 POLICE FORD

UTILITY INTERCEPTORS FROM DOWNTOWN FORD OF SACRAMENTO,
RATIFYING PURCHASE OF ONE ( 1) 2023 CHEVY POLICE TAHOE FROM FUTURE CHEVROLET, APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 WITH NEXTGEN

ALPHA UPFITTING FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF POLICE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT, APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH

CONTINENTAL COLLISION FOR THE AUTO- BODY PAINT SERVICE, AND

APPROVING RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, during the January 9, 2023 Councii Meeting, Council approved an additional five ( 5) sworn officer positions and funding of $ 215, 500 forthe purchase of three ( 3) additional vehicles for the new positions; and WHEREAS, in December 2022, one of the Patrol Ford Interceptors sustained significant damage from a traffic accident and will require replacement; and WHEREAS, the City is currently waiting on the insurance company to provide the amount the City will be reimbursed for the damaged vehicle; and WHEREAS, with the Patrol Unit fleet down by one vehicle, in order to ensure there are sufficient patrol vehicles for the officers and due to the shortage and lack of availability of police vehicles, Command Staff recommends replacement of the damaged vehicle as soon as possible; and
WHEREAS, the Ford Police InterceptorUtility Vehicle ( PIU) is built specifically for law enforcement, therefore, the PIU vehicle was selected as the standard vehicle for the new Lathrop Police Department; and
WHEREAS, pursuantto Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC) section 2. 36. 110, staff reached out to Folsom Ford and WinnerChevrolet, both have contracts with the State Office for Procurement Department of General Services; and WHEREAS, neither Folsom Ford nor Winner Chevrolet had police vehicles in their inventory, and all 2023 police vehicles were sold out; and WHEREAS, pursuantto LMC 2. 36. 080( A)( 2), to efficiently and timely maintain essential public services, staff solicited quotes from four additional dealerships and received quotesonlyfrom Downtown Ford of Sacramento and FutureChevrolet; and WHEREAS, on the emergencydetermination by Chief Bechler pursuantto LMC

2. 36. 080( A), the City Managerexecuted Purchase Order 2023- 356 in the amount of 149, 177. 51 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento for three ( 3) 2022 Police Interceptors and Purchase Order2023- 360 in the amount of $ 59, 997. 70 with Future Chevrolet for one ( 1) Chevy Police Tahoe; and
353
WHEREAS, the cost for each of the 2022 Police Interceptors of $ 45, 441 is comparable to that of the State contract price of $ 45, 813 for their 2022 police vehicles and the cost of $ 55, 037 for the 2023 Chevy Police Tahoe is $ 8, 747 more than the State contract price of $ 46, 290 for the 2021 Chevy Police Tahoe, which based on the current inflation rate of vehicle prices, staff considered acceptable; and WHEREAS, the new vehicles will need to be outfitted with police equipment and painted to match the approved specifications of the Lathrop Police Department fleet; and
WHEREAS, the City currently has emergency contracts pursuant to LMC

2. 36. 080( A)( 2) with NextGen Alpha Upfitting ( NextGen) for the purchase and installation of police equipment and Continental Collision ( Continental) to provide the Auto- Body Paint Services for the Lathrop Police Department Fleet; and WHEREAS, Change OrderNo. 3 with NextGen forthe fourvehicles is fora notto- exceed amountof$ 116, 797whileChangeOrderNo. 1 with Continental Collision is for a not- to- exceed amount of $ 23, 360.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby ratify the City Manager' s actions approving Purchase Order 2023- 356 with Downtown Ford of Sacramento for $ 149, 177. 51 and Purchase Order 2023- 360 with Future Chevrolet for $ 59, 997. 70, approve Change Order No. 3 with NextGen Alpha Upfitting for a not- to- exceed amount of $ 116, 797 for the purchase and installation of police equipment, approve Change Order No. 1 with Continental Collision for a not- to- exceed amount of $ 23, 360 for the auto- body paint services, and approve budget amendment of $84, 476 to be transferred from the Capital Replacement Fund for the cost of the vehicle replacement as follows:

Increase - Settlement Revenue
1010- 40- 30- 371- 08- 00 84, 476
Decrease - Capital Replacement Reserves
1010- 243- 00- 00 84, 476
Increase - Vehicle
1010- 40- 30- 450- 30- 00 84, 476
354
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of February 2023, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 355

ATTACHMENT B
W 940 River Islands Pkwy
Purchase Order
Lathrop, CA 95330 No. 2023- 00000356
o Date 1/ 31 l2023
Resolution

PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST
The parties to this agreement APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, SHIPPERS, BILL ar@'

OF LADING AND CORRESPONDENCE
Vendor No. 466

DELIVER BY
G DOWNTOWN FORD SALES, INC y g40 River Islands Pkwy

SHIP VIA
1535 hOWE aVE FREIGHT TERMS Lathrop, CA 95330
O
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 PAGE 1 of 3
o ORIGINATOR Cristina Caguiat

3.00 EACH 2O22 Ford PIU 45, 441. 0000 $ 136,323.00

1. 00 EACH Delivery 900. 0000 900. 00

1. 00 EACH Sales Tax 11, 928. 2600 a11, 928. 26

1. 00 EACH CA Tire Tax 26. 2500 26. 25
The contractor agrees to fumish all labor, equipment and materiais necessary to perform the services 149, 177. 51 describe herein and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions identified below which are made a part hereof by this reference( Outline exact detail what is to be done, where is to be done and include work specifications, if applicable.)
CITY OF LATHROP VENDOR ( Signature)

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL DATE APPROVED BY DATE
OF LATHROP VENDOR ( Print Name)

APPROVED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE
Special Instructions
Three 2022 Ford Police InterceptorsRESO 22-5207- Approved by City Council 1/ 9/23 for 3 additional Patrol Vehicles

Page 1 of 3 ends

Lathrop City CouncilFebruary 13, 2023

Lathrop City Council
February 13, 2023