Cities Index.
2024-05-13_item_5.1_approve_ballots_for_the_proposed_sjafca_mossdale_tract_overlay_assessment_district_formation

Lathrop City Council
May 13, 2024

Document
2024-05-13_item_5.1_approve_ballots_for_the_proposed_sjafca_mossdale_tract_overlay_assessment_district_formation
Meeting
May 13, 2024
Body
Lathrop City Council
Original file
13.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.ci.lathrop.ca.us. That file is the official record.

ITEM 5. 1

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: APPROVE BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN

JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE

TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE BALLOTS FOR CITY -OWNED

PROPERTIES
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Approve Ballots for the Proposed San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA)
Mossdale Tract Assessment District Formation and
Authorize the City Manager to Execute Ballots for
City -Owned Properties
SUMMARY:

The City of Lathrop is a Member Agency of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency SJAFCA). SJAFCA' smission is to reduce and manage the region' sflood risk. Their objectives and priority actions include delivering projects and programs to improve flood protection.

On April 18, 2024, the SJAFCA Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form an assessment district to provide a local cost share for a $ 473M levee improvement project ( Project) to provide an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) to the Mossdale Tract Area.

Under California law, property owners within the potential assessment district may submit ballots to support or protest the creation of the assessment district. The City owns 41 parcels within the proposed assessment boundary. A summary of the 41 assessed parcels with annual assessments totaling $ 30, 511. 08and map showing those parcels is included as Attachment " B". A copy of the notice is included as Attachment " C".

Staff recommends Council to support SJAFCA' screation of the assessment district to establish a funding mechanism for the 200 -year flood protection to the Mossdale Tract Area and authorize the City Manager to execute the ballots for the City -owned properties.

BACKGROUND:

SJAFCA, a joint powers authority of the Cities of Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca, as well as San Joaquin County and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, is responsible for reducing flood risk for the greater -Stockton metropolitan region through planning, financing, and implementing projects and programs. SJAFCA' s
priority is to provide an ULOP ( 200 -Year) in the Mossdale Tract CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

APPROVE BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD

CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BALLOTS

FOR CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
area, which includes Weston Ranch in south Stockton, the City of Lathrop west of the San Joaquin River, the western portions of the City of Manteca and the unincorporated portions of the County.

Since 2018, SJAFCA has partnered with its member agencies to advance the funding program for 200 -Year improvements to the levee system protecting the area. This includes improvements to the existing Reclamation District 17 ( RD 17) levees to ensure they meet Urban Levee Design Criteria as well as the construction of an extension to the dryland levee south of Manteca to the east. Figure 1 below provides a diagram showing the vicinity of the proposed improvements.

Overlay Assessment District
Project Map - Alternative 4a
Roberts
Island
Restricted Development
Precluded by Delta Plan
3, 620 Acres Total)
Legend
MN 200 -Year Levee
o Tie Back Levee Extension
RM- 52 Setback Levee
Restricted Development Area
With Binding Easements
Restricted Development Area
Precluded by Delta Plan
Fix In Place Improvements
EN Freeboard
Cutoff Wall/ Seepage Berm
Ecosystem Restoration
Restoration at 11 Sites of
River Channel ( 29. 7ac)
Regrading/ Revegetation( 150
ac)
Restoration at RM- 52 Setback
Levee ( 158 ac)
0 0. 5 1 2 Miles
l
Fry
Elements of
Alternative 4a,
Fix in place levee improvements
Te back levee extension
861- 52 setback levee
Ecosystem restoration of 158
acres at RM• 52 setback levee
Protection of 1-5 and Hwy 120
Multibenefit feature of 3. 1 miles
of hike paths
Multlbenefit feature of 165 acres of
planned park
Environmental restoration of 29 7 acres
of land at 11 sites of river channel
Habitat enhancement of 150. 7 acres of
land set for regrade and revegetanon
Open space and agrkulture protected
by restricted development fa, 240 acres)
Lathrop
Rol, Rd
Restricted Development
Through Binding Easements
1, 430 Acres Total)
Lamina Rn
Figure 1
Seventy- seven percent ( 77%) of the cost for the $ 473M Project is expected to be paid by state and federal agencies. To secure state and federal funding, SJAFCA must pay the remaining twenty- three percent ( 23%) of project costs ( local cost share).

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

APPROVE BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD

CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BALLOTS

FOR CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
On April 18, 2024, the SJAFCA Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form an assessment district to provide the local cost share for the $ 473M levee improvement project to provide an ULOP to the Mossdale Tract Area.

As part of the resolution of intention to form the Assessment District adopted by SJAFCA, they preliminarily approved an Engineer' sReport included as Attachment D" that describes the methodology for determining the amount of benefit received by each property.

Under California law, property owners, including public agencies, within the proposed assessment district boundary are eligible to vote on the proposed assessment. Each property owner' svote is weighted by the amount of the assessment proposed for the specified property.

The City of Lathrop owns 41 parcels that will benefit from the services proposed to be funded by the proposed Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District. The proposed annual assessments for all 41 parcels totals $ 30, 511. 08. The maximum authorized Assessment Rate may be increased in future years by an annual escalator based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index, subject to a minimum of zero percent and a maximum of four percent in any given year, upon approval by the SJAFCA Board of Directors. The City has received five ballots ( there are up to 10 parcels listed per ballot) that are being presented to the City Council for consideration.

If the assessment is not approved by property owners, the community will lose eligibility for state and federal funding and the ability to implement the improvements. As a result, flood risk would increase over time, and the area would be subject to the regulatory impacts of Senate Bill 5. It would also place the community at risk of FEMA remapping and the associated flood insurance mandate in the future.

Staff recommends Council vote its ballots in support of the creation of the proposed assessment district to establish a funding mechanism for the 200 -year flood protection to the Mossdale Tract Area and authorize the City Manager to execute the ballots for the City -owned properties.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The City of Lathrop owns 41 parcels within the proposed boundaries of the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District. The City has previously partnered with SJAFCA to implement the other elements required to generate the local cost share of a project to provide 200 -year flood protection to the Mossdale Tract area. To secure the state and federal funding, which is 77% of the total cost of the flood protection improvements, SJAFCA must pay the remaining the 23%. The establishment of the proposed assessment district for the Mossdale Tract will create a funding mechanism for the required 23% local share of funding.

CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
MAY 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

APPROVE BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD

CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BALLOTS

FOR CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate fiscal impact to the City as a result of taking action related to the ballots. The fiscal impact will depend upon the outcome of the ballot proceeding and any subsequent action taken by SJAFCA.

If the assessment district is approved, the initial fiscal impact to the City is estimated to be $ 30, 511. 08in FY24- 25, with an unknown annual escalator not -to -exceed four percent ( 4%). Funds would be appropriated through the FY2024- 25 budget process and budgeted accordingly during subsequent years.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution Approving Ballots for the Proposed San Joaquin Area Flood Area Control Agency ( SJAFCA) Mossdale Tract Assessment District Formation and Authorize the City Manager to Execute Ballots for City -Owned Properties B. Summary of Assessments for City of Lathrop Owned Parcels and Map of Parcels and Assessment District Boundary
C. Ballot Notice and Information Guide
D. Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment Preliminary Engineer' sReport CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 5
MAY 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

APPROVE BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD

CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BALLOTS

FOR CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES

APPROVALS
Brad ylor
City Engin
Cari e
Finance Dire tor
5'/` 7/-? 0zz4
Date
Date
5/ 1/- zoai- 1
5- •7- wzy
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
st- iflo/ 211
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Stephen Salvatore Date
City Manager
S&z. ozy
RESOLUTION NO. 24-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP

APPROVING BALLOTS FOR THE PROPOSED SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD AREA

CONTROL AGENCY ( SJAFCA) MOSSDALE TRACT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FORMATION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BALLOTS

FOR CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA), a joint powers authority of the Cities of Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca, as well as San Joaquin County and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, is responsible for reducing flood risk for the greater -Stockton metropolitan region through planning, financing, and implementing projects and programs; and WHEREAS, SJAFCA' s
priority is to provide an Urban Level of Flood Protection 200 -Year), in the Mossdale Tract area, which includes Weston Ranch in south Stockton, the City of Lathrop west of the San Joaquin River, the western portions of the City of Manteca and the unincorporated portions of the County; and WHEREAS, since 2018, SJAFCA has partnered with its member agencies to advance the funding program for 200 -Year improvements to the levee system protecting the area. This would include improvements to the existing Reclamation District 17 ( RD 17) levees to ensure they meet Urban Levee Design Criteria as well as the construction of an extension to the dryland levee south of Manteca to the east.

A diagram showing the vicinity of the proposed improvements is provided in Figure 1 of the City Manager' sReport that accompanied this Resolution; and WHEREAS, seventy- seven percent ( 77%) of the cost for the $ 473M levee improvement project ( Project) is expected to be paid by state and federal agencies.

To secure state and federal funding, SJAFCA must pay the remaining twenty- three percent ( 23%) of project costs ( local cost share); and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2024, the SJAFCA Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form an assessment district to provide the local cost share for the Project to provide an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) to the Mossdale Tract Area; and
WHEREAS, as part of the resolution of intention to form the Assessment District adopted by SJAFCA, they preliminarily approved an Engineer' s Report included as Attachment " D" to the City Manager' sReport that accompanied this Resolution that describes the methodology for determining the amount of benefit received by each property; and
WHEREAS, under California law, property owners, including public agencies, within the proposed assessment district boundary are eligible to vote on the proposed assessment. Each property owner' s vote is weighted by the amount of the assessment proposed for the specified property; and
WHEREAS, The City of Lathrop owns 41 parcels that will benefit from the services proposed to be funded by the proposed Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District. The proposed annual assessments for all 41 parcels totals $ 30, 511. 08, included as Attachment " B" to the City Manager' s Report that accompanied this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the maximum authorized Assessment Rate may be increased in future years by an annual escalator based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index, subject to a minimum of zero percent and a maximum of four percent in any given year, upon approval by the SJAFCA Board of Directors. The City has received five ballots ( there are up to 10 parcels listed per ballot) that are being presented to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, if the assessment is not approved by property owners, the community will lose eligibility for state and federal funding and the ability to implement the improvements. As a result, flood risk would increase over time, and the area would be subject to the regulatory impacts of Senate Bill 5. It would also place the community at risk of FEMA remapping and the associated flood insurance mandate in the future; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends Council vote its ballots in support of the creation of the proposed assessment district to establish a funding mechanism for the 200 - year flood protection to the Mossdale Tract Area and authorize the City Manager to execute the ballots for the City -owned properties.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop that approves and accepts the following actions:

1. The creation of the Mossdale Overlay Assessment District to establish a funding mechanism for the 200 -year flood protection to the Mossdale Tract Area

2. The City Manager, or their designee, is authorized to execute ballots for City - owned properties
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 13th day of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Jo
San
aquin
Area
Flo
odControl
Agency
Overlay
Assessment
District
Owner:

CITY
OF

LATHROP
Parcel
Number
Property
Location
Assessment Zone
Land
Use
Classification
Assess
or'
Assessment
Acreage
Acreage
s
or' s
Assess
Structure
Square
F
ootage
F
196- 260 13- 000
15668
SIXTH
ST
Zone
2 196- 260- 19 000
1255

THOMSEN
RD
Zone
2 191- 340 09-0
703
RIVER

ISLANDS
Zone
2 191- 550 76- 000
17150
COBBLE
CREEK
WAY
Zone
2 191- 700 07-
17287
GOLDEN
VALLEY
Zone
2 192- 020- 18 000
751
DOS
REIS
RD
Zone
2 192- 040 56- 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 192- 040 57- 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 191- 700- 08
390
TOWNE
CENTRE
DR
Zone
2 196- 040 11- 000
991
W

LATHROP
RD
Zone
2 196- 040 13- 000
931
W

LATHROP
RD
Zone
2 196- 050 20- 0
14469

REVEREND

MAURICI
Zone
2 196-30- 40 0
266
CAMISH
PL
Zone
2 196-30 41 00
284
CAMISH
PL
Zone
2 196-30 42 00
306
CAMISH
PL
Zone
2 196-30 46 00
345
VILLA
REAL
CT
Zone
2 196-30 47 00
323
VILLA
REAL
Zo
CT
ne
2 196- 240 30- 0
15667
FIFTH
ST
Zone
2 196- 260 14- 000
1199

THOMSEN
RD
Zone
2 196-10 26 00
15189

SHARLAN
RD
Zone
2 196- 310 29- 000
600
N
ST
Zone
2 196- 360 08-0
1179
0 ST
Zone
2 196- 470- 20 0
16165

MATADOR
WAY
Zone
2 196- 710 57- 000
105

TRAVERTINE
AVE
Zone
2 198- 030 19- 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 Public -
Misc.

Public -
Misc .

Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Public -
Gov.

Public -
Gov. Agricultural Commercial -
Vacant
Commercial -
Vacant
Commercial -
Misc .

Commercial -
Misc .

Commercial -
Misc.

Commercial -
Misc.

Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Residential -
M
ultifamily
1 Story
Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Public -
Go
v.

Public -
School Commercial -
Misc.

Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Commercial - Misc.Residential -
Vacant
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
0 .
26 0. 17 0 .
19 0 .
12 0. 20 19. 61 1 .
45 720. 3 .
00 4 .
80 1 .
34 1. 00 0 .
14 140. 140. 0 .
16 290.

0. 43 1.2 411.

1. 47

0. 20

1. 90

0. 16

2. 35
0 .
26 0 .
17 0. 19 0. 12 0. 20 19. 61 1 .
45 0 .
72 3 .
00 4 .
80 1. 34 1 .
00 0. 14 0 .
14 0 .
14 0 .
16 0 .
29 0 .
43 1 .
12 1 .
41 471.

0. 20

1. 90

0. 16

2. 35
0 1, 889 2, 345
0 0 0
427, 97 19, 602 19, 602 427, 97
0 0 0 0 0
7, 355 2, 164 427, 97
0 0
427, 97
0 0
1, 481
1,
2, 313
2,2,1,2,
100,
19,19,
100,
2,2,2,2,2,7,2,
100,
5,5,
100,
Prepared
by
LWA
Page
1 of
2 SIAFCA
San
Joaquin
Area
Fl
ood Control
Agency
Overlay
Assessment
District
Owner:

CITY
OF

LATHROP
Parcel
Number
Property
Location Assessment Zone
198- 040 15- 000
1800
W

LATHROP
RD
Zone
2 198- 050- 29- 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-30 000
18400

SHARLAN
RD
Zone
2 198-30- 21 000
19094

CHRISTOPHER
WAY
Zone
2 198-30 35 000
18800

CHRISTOPHER
WAY
Zone
2 198-30- 44 000
18500

SHARLAN
RD
Zone
2 198-30 54 00
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-30- 55 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-30 56 00
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-30- 57 000
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-30 5 00
No
Address
Available
Zone
2 198-60- 030
2112
E
LOUISE
AVE
Zone
2 198-60 23 00
2444
E
LOUISE
AVE
Zone
2 198-30- 20 0
19104

CHRISTOPHER
WAY
Zone
2 198- 230 05-0
17550

SHIDELER
Zone
2 241- 030- 24 000
5020
W

YOSEMITE
AVE
Zone
2 Total
Land
Use
Classification
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Public -
Gov.

Public -
Gov .

Public -
Gov .

Residential -
Multifamily
1 Story
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Gov.Public - Public -
Gov. Commercial -
Office
2 Story
Public - Gov.Industrial -
Light Manufacturing
Assessor' s
Assessment
Acreage
Acreage
890. 1. 89 0 .
20 2 .
51 9 .
91 8. 61 5. 02 217. 6. 04 4 .
88 9 .
00 12 .
00 0. 13 10 .
28 0. 60 18. 39 140. 33

0. 89 1 .
89 0 .
20 2 .
51 9 .
91 8 .
61 5 .
02 217. 6 .
04 4. 88 9. 00 12 .
00 0 .
13 10. 28 0. 60 18. 39 140 .
33 or' s
Assess Structure Square Footage
0 0
1, 292 3,20 6, 249
0 0 0 0 0 0
22,79 1, 211 998 114,
0 0
1, 918 00
Str
1,
3,
6,3,
22,
1,
100,
619,
Prepared
by
LWA
Page
2 of
2 SJAFCA
Overlay Assessment District
City of Lathrop Parcels
Legend
0 Proposed 040 Boundary
City of Lathrop Parcels
0 0. 25 0. 5
i t 1
1 Mile
raft srosswood
Manteca
Junction
N
A
HOW
TO

COMPLETE &
RETURN
YOUR
BALLOT
Ballots
must
be
received
before
the
close
of
the
public
heating
onThursday,
June

20. By
law,
ballots
received
after
the
close
of
the
public
hearing
cannot
beaccepted.

To
complete
your
ballot:

TOCOMPLETE
YOUR
BALLOT: - -
fl
Cast
your
vote
bymarking
k" an "
in
the
box
next
to "
Yes"
or '
No '
Print
and
sign
your
name
Date
your
ballot
Place
your
entire
ballot
in
the
postage -
paid
return
envelope
IMPORTANT!
Do
not
tear
off
any
portion
of
the
ballot
or
it
will
not accepted. be

TORETURN
YOUR
BALLOT:

A)
BY
MAIL —
Ballots
must
be
in
the
postage -
paid
security
envelope,
mailed
and
received
no
later
than p. 5
m.,
Thursday,
June

20. Postmarks
cannot
be
accepted.

B)
BY
HAND —
Place
in
the
security
envelope
and a. Deliver
to
City
of
Lathrop
City
Hall,
390
Towne
Centre
Drive,
Lathrop.
b. Deliver
to
any
of
the community
meetings
as
noticed
in
this
ballot
guide.
c. Deliver
to
the
public
hearing
at
6 p. m,
Thursday,
June
20,
City
of
Lathrop
City
Council
Chambers,
390
Towne
Centre
Drive,
Lathrop.

Scan
to
v isit
our
website
for
more
information
ATTEND

ACOMMUNITY

MEETING
Commu nity Meeting6: 30
p .
m.,
May
13 JosephWidmer, Jr. Elementary
School,
Multi -
purpose
Room;
751Stonebridge
Lane,
Lathrop
Community Me
eting
6: 30
p .
m.,
May
14 Great
Valley
Elementary,
Multi -
purpose
Room;
4223
McDougald
Blvd.,
Stockton
PUBLIC

HEARING &
CLOSE
OF

BALLOTING
6 p .
m .,
Thursday,
June
20 City
of
Lathrop
City
Council
Chambers
390
To
Centrewne Drive,
Lathrop
YES"
OR "
NO,"
WHAT
HAPPENS?
Yes,
or
no,
there
will
be
costs
to
property
owners .

NO
New
assessment
begins
fall
2024
Development
and
growthwill
pay
70%
of
the
local
cost
share
for
the
levee
i
mprovement
project
SJAFCA
can
secure
77%
federal state/
cost
share
for
the
levee
i
mprovement
project
6-$ 363
million)
Project
construction
may
begin
as
early
as
2026
Project
will
provide
200 -
year
flood
pr
otectio n &
comply
with
state requirements,
once
complete
Project
will
protect
lives,
property,
and
the
local
economy,
and
stand
up
to
changes
in
federal state/
flood
protection
regulations
Cities
and County
will
be
allow
ed
to
implement
planned
development,
including
commercial
and
retail
Properties
will
not
be
charged
an
annual
assessment
to
reduce
flood
risk
and
meet
state
requirements
for
200 -
year
flood
protection.

The
levee
improvement
project
will
not
beconstructed,
and
flood
risk
and
financial
riskwill increase
over
time
Communities
will
lose -
5363
million
in
state/ federal
funding
for
levee
improvements .

Communities
w
ill
be
responsible
for
the
full
cost
of
any
needed
levee
improvements
in
the
future .

Communities
w
ill
not
be
able
to
meet
state requirements
for
200 -
year
flood
protection,
and
risk
n
otmeeting
future
changes
to
federal
regulations (
resulting
inmandatory
flood
insurance)
The
communities
w
ill
not
be
allowed
to
adapt
to
changing
economic
conditions
There
will
be
no
redevelopment
of
existing
properties,
even
ifbusinesses
quit
or
leave .

There
w
ill
be
no
new
development,
including
commercial
and
industrial.

Planned
development -
such
as
grocery
stores
and
restaurants -
will
not
be
allowed
to
move
forward.
200 -
for
VISIT
ATTEND
A
COM
WHAT

PROBLEM
ARE
WE
TRYING
TO
SOLVE?
More
than
22, 000
properties
in
portions
of
south
Stockton,
Lathrop,
Manteca,
and
surrounding
unincorporated
area (
Mossdale
Tract)
can
flood
from
the
San
Joaquin
River
and
French Slough. Camp
Levees
are
the
only
protection
against
flood
damages.

Rapid
betw
shifts
een
too
little
and
too
much
water (
drought
and
flood)
can
w
ear
down
and
weaken
levees.

And,
thanks
to
major
flood
disasters
inCalifornia
and
elsewhere
in
the
U. S,
state
and
federal
regulations
for
flood
protection
are getting
stricter.

Failure
to
meet
them
has
costly consequences
forowners
property
and
communities. As
a
result,
properties
in
the
Mossdale
Tract
area
face
two
types
of
risk:

O
Flooding
theSa
from
Jon
aquin
River
and tribu ta
its
ries (
like
French
Slo
Camp
ugh)
OEconomic
impacts
no
from
meeting t
state protectionflood regulations

WHAT' S
THE

PROPOSED
SOLUTION?
The
best
defense
against
both
types
of
risk
is
to
improve
levees.

The
San
Joaquin
Area
Flood
Control
Agency (

SJAFCA)
is
responsible
for
reducing
flood
risk
for
the
greater -
Stockton
metropolitan
region
through
planning,
financing,
and
implementing
projects
and
programs
to
improve
flood
protection.

The
Agency
is
planning
a
473
million
levee
improvement
project
to
protect
lives,
property,
and
the
local
economy,
and
to
meet
state requirements
for
200 -
year
flood
protection.

The
project
will
improve
levees
along
the
east
bank
of
the
San
Joaquin
River
and
the
south
bank
of
French Slough. Camp
It
wit
also
extend
the
existing
dryland
levee
south
of
Highway
120
Manteca.in

FEDERAL &
STATE

AGENCIES

EXPECTED
TO
FUND
77%
OF
LEVEE

IMPROVEMENT
COSTS
Seventy- seven
percent -- $
362. 6
million --
of
all
project
costs
are expected
to
be
paid
by
state
and
federal
agencies.

To
secure
the
state
and
federal
funding,
SJAFCA
must
provide
a
local
cost
share
of $
110
million,
plus
an additional
522. 4
million
for
early
planning
and
design
costs (
total =
5132. 4M).

Seventy
percent (
70%)
of
the
local
cost
share
will
be
funded
by
ne
w
development
and
wth.
gro
SJAFCA
is
proposing
an
annual
property
assessment
to
pay
for
the
remaining
30%.

Of
the
local
cost
share,
70%
isDevelopment/ Growth
and
30%
isProperty
Assessment 23%
Local
77% Fed State/eral
HOW

PROPOSED
The
proposed
assessment
benefit
from
the
avoidance
the
project.

By
law,
each
Each
property' s
assessment
footage,
size
of
parcel,
from
the
avoidance
of
flood
properties
only
receive
www .
sjafca. org/ OAD
to
the
factors
being
used
to
determine
your
property' s
parcel
number
required) .

The
assessment
is
expected
to
raise «

52. 6M
in
fiscal
year
2024/5.

Assessment
can
only
be
spent
to
fund
the
local
cost
share
for
the
construction
and
of
a
levee
improvement
that
provides
200 -
year
flood
protection
for
the
Mossdale
Tract
area,
as
outlined
in
the
Preliminary
Engineer' s
Report
available
online
at
www .

OAD). org/
The
assessment
end
once
construction
bonds
paid ( approximately
30 years).

The
assessment
can
each
year
based
upon
cost
of
living (
Consumer
Price
Index),
but
no
more
than
4 percent (
whichever
is
less).

Cost
of
living adjustments
not
automatic.

Any
annual
increase
must
be
approved
the
SJAFCA
Board
as
part
of
its
annual
budget
process.
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T. 951. 587. 35001800. 755. 6864
F. 951. 587. 35101888. 326. 6864
Property Tax Information Line
T. 866.07. 6864
www.illdan. com

ATTACHMENT
San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
Preliminary Engineer' sReport
Formation of:

Mossdale Tract Overlay
Assessment District
Mossdale OAD)
Commencing Fiscal Year 2024/025
Intent Meeting: April 18, 2024
Public Hearing: June 20, 2024
MARCH 2024

PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES

WI LLDAN
Financial Services

ENGINEER' SREPORT AFFIDAVIT
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Formation of the
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2024/025
County of San Joaquin, State of California
This Engineer' s Report (" Report") and the enclosed descriptions and diagrams outline the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (" SJAFCA" or " Agency") proposed formation and establishment of annual assessments for the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District hereinafter referred to as " District") commencing with fiscal year 2024/025. Said District incorporates each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within San Joaquin County that receives special benefit from the construction and operation of flood risk reduction components in and adjacent to the Mossdale Tract Area within the boundaries of said District as defined by the District Diagram contained herein as Part IV and adopted at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Joaquin County Assessor' s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said territory and District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report that includes a general description of the plans and specifications, method of apportionment, budget and proposed special benefit assessments associated therewith as directed by the SJAFCA Board of Directors (" Board") and pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6. 4 of the California Govemment Code, commencing with Section 54703.

Dated this - -}
h
day of Pi141. 1' =h 2024.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
r
By:

Jim M ire
Princi rI Consultant, Project Manager
Tyron* Peter
PE# C81888
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page i
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Background 3
Legislative Authority 3
Ballot Proceedings 6
Engineer' sReport 6
Part I — Plans and Specifications 9
District Overview 9
Project Location 9
Project Objectives 10
Proposed Project 10
Part II — Estimate of Costs 14
Proposed Project Budget 15
Proposed Project Funding 16
Financing Plan / Assessment Budget 16
Authorized Term / Use of Revenues 17
Part III — Method of Apportionment 18
Benefit Analysis 18
Assessment Methodology (Special Benefit Calculations) 21 Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) 33 Appeals Process 33
Part IV — Assessment Roll 35
PART V — ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 36
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page ii

W WILLDAN
Introduction
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
The San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) is a Joint Powers Authority that was created in May 1995 between the City of Stockton, San Joaquin County and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the purpose of addressing flood protection for the City of Stockton and surrounding County area.

On November 16, 2017, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement was amended to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca to address the requirements of California Senate Bill 5 within the area known as the Mossdale Tract. SJAFCA has a nine member Board of Directors with one (1) member of the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; one ( 1) member of the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors; two ( 2) members from Stockton City Council; two ( 2) members from Lathrop City Council; two ( 2) members from Manteca City Council; and one ( 1) member of the public.

Following flooding disasters prompted by Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) embarked upon a comprehensive reevaluation of local flood risk and flood protection. FEMA has undertaken a Map Modernization Program that has resulted in a levee recertification program with new and more stringent levee standards. Other challenges involve State legislation that went into effect in 2007 Senate Bill 5), which requires 200 -year level of flood protection for urban or urbanizing areas' within California' sCentral Valley.

SB 5 defines Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) as the "level of protection that is necessary to withstand flooding that has a 1 - in -200 chance of occurring in any given year using criteria consistent with, or developed by, the California Department of Water Resources." Senate Bill 5 requires all cities and counties within the Sacramento - San Joaquin Valley, as defined in California Government Code § 65007( h), to make findings related to ULOP or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) standard of flood protection before: ( 1) entering into a development agreement for any property that is located within a flood hazard zone; (2) approving a discretionary permit or other discretionary entitlement, or a ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence, for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone; or 3) approving a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for any subdivision that is located within a flood hazard zone (see California Government Code § 65865. 5, 65962, and 66474. 5).

State and USACE levee standards and criteria continue to evolve and impact SJAFCA' spriorities going forward. For the Mossdale Tract Area , SJAFCA continues to work with San Joaquin County, local cities (Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca), and Reclamation District No. 17 (" RD 17") to address flood protection issues, levee standards and levee requirements that meet both State and Federal regulatory requirements ( see Figure 1 on page 2 for a general overview illustration of the Mossdale Tract Area ).
1 Government Code § 65007 ( I) and ( h) define Urban Areas as developed areas where there are 10, 000 or more residents and Urbanizing Areas as developed areas, or an area outside a developed area that is planned or anticipated to have 10, 000 residents or more within the next 10 years.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 1

WI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
FIGURE 1 — MOSSDALE TRACT AREA GENERAL OVERVIEW
Vr1
rrr I

1.°
I
S ., ,, , . ,,• y,, !
f
of
I. I
ti.> /
r
sr.

I
YymiteAct
k,,
1 Stewart kd ti`' r I f
It
l
N,
J
r —
I
Rt osscale Tract Area
SPFC Levee
RD17 Jvrsidiction
Lathrop Cary Limits
Manteca City Limits
Stockton City L mits
I`1
4 es
SOURCE: 2021: K ; N, 2022; PBI, 2022, ESA 2022 Mosscale Tract Area Urban Flood Rsk Reduction Projet Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 2

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Background
The Mossdale Tract Area is surrounded by approximately 19 miles of continuous levees that provide protection from floodwaters of streams, creeks, rivers, and bypasses that empty into the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta, and from extreme high tides. The levees are operated and maintained by the local reclamation district, RD 17. The Mossdale Tract Area covers approximately 22, 400 acres and is bounded by French Camp Slough to the north, the San Joaquin River to the west, and the Walthall Slough to the south. The Mossdale Tract Area spans an area that incorporates portions of the cities of Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca that are highly urbanized, as well as portions of unincorporated San Joaquin County. RD 17 levees protect residential, commercial, industrial, as well as agricultural properties and they do not currently provide 200 -year flood protection as required by Senate Bill 5.

The existing plan, as reported by SJAFCA annually since 2018 to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, for meeting state requirements includes two components:

RD 17' s recently completed Levee Seepage Repair Project ( LSRP); and Levee Improvements to achieve 200 -year flood protection ( the SJAFCA Project or Project).

In general, the SJAFCA Project consists of a fix -in -place levee improvement project and an extension of the existing dryland levee in Manteca.

The estimated Project cost is approximately $ 472. 87 million with funding expected to come from the following sources:

State Funding in the form of Grants to SJAFCA and cash contributions to the United States Army Corp of Engineers ( USACE);
Federal Funding in the form of implementation and construction of facilities by the USACE; and,
Local Funding sources including, but not limited to:

Direct funding from the Cities of Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca (Cities), and San Joaquin County;
The Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Program adopted by SJAFCA, the Cities and San Joaquin Count; The Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD); and, The Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District ( the focus of this Report).

Legislative Authority
Pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Govt. Code Section 6500 et seq.

JEP Act"). Agencies formed pursuant to the JEP Act may provide financing for any of their members or other local agencies in the State of California in connection with the acquisition, construction, improvement, and maintenance of public capital improvements, working capital requirements or insurance programs of such members or other local agencies.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Government Code sections 54703- 54719, ("1982 Act"), and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 3

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
of the California State Constitution Article XIIID (" California Constitution"), the Board of Directors Board") of SJAFCA proposes to form and levy special benefit assessments for the district to be designated as:

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
hereafter referred to as " District"), which includes all lots and parcels of land within portions of the cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton as well as portions of unincorporated San Joaquin County that receive a particular and distinct benefit ( special benefit) from the operation, program planning, design, construction, installation, implementation, and maintenance of the proposed fix in place and potential levee setback improvements and the dryland levee extension to achieve and maintain 200 -year ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area , including related incidental expenses, and collectively referred to as "Project Services."
As required pursuant to Section 54716 of the 1982 Act, this Engineer' sReport has been prepared in connection with the formation of said District and the levy and collection of annual assessments authorized pursuant to Section 54710. of the 1982 Act to finance the cost of installation and improvement of facilities related thereto, commencing in fiscal year 2024/025.

The Board proposes to form the District, and annually levy and collect special benefit assessments on the San Joaquin County tax roll or directly bill properties owners to fund a portion of the improvement costs and expenses that are deemed necessary and essential requirements to minimize potential flood risks and provide a distinct and particular benefit to those assessed properties.

This Engineer' sReport has been prepared on behalf of SJAFCA for the purpose of creating a new local funding mechanism to enhance flood protection facilities and services in the Mossdale Tract Area . It describes the funding objectives, apportionment methodology, formation process and collection of a new special benefit assessment district proposed to fund in part the flood control improvements and expenses to be constructed and installed to achieve and maintain 200 - year Urban Level of Flood Protection (" ULOP") for the Mossdale Tract Area . 1982 Act
Section 54710( a) of the 1982 Act permits any local agency which is authorized by law to provide flood control may impose a benefit assessment pursuant to this chapter to finance the maintenance and operation costs of flood control services. In addition to maintenance and operation costs, Section 54710. authorizes agencies to finance the cost of installation and improvement of flood control facilities:

Any local agency which is authorized by law to provide drainage services or flood control services may, in addition to imposing a benefit assessment for the purposes authorized pursuant to Section 54710, impose such an assessment to finance the cost of installation and improvement of facilities."
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 4

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Other provisions of 1982 Act worth noting include the following:

Section 54711 outlines certain prerequisites that must be met for the levy of benefit assessments:
1) "The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel ofproperty shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service..." 2) "The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service..."
3) "The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied..." Pursuant to Section 54716( a) an engineer' sreport shall be prepared and filed with the clerk of the local agency and contain all of the following information:
1) "A description of the service proposed to be financed through the revenue derived from the assessment."
2) "A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment..."
3) "The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel." 4) "The basis and schedule of the assessment."
California Constitution
The costs of the proposed improvements addressed in this Report have been identified and allocated to the parcels within the boundaries of the District based on proportional special benefits as outlined by Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Article XIII D Section 2(d) defines District as follows:

District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service." Article XIII D Section 2( i) defines Special Benefit as follows:

Special benefit" means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement ofproperty value does not constitute " special benefit." Article XIII D Section 4(a) defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:

An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed.

The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel." Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 5

WWII LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Ballot Proceedings
Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, the SJAFCA Board shall call for and conduct a property owner protest ballot proceeding ( referred to as "Ballot Proceeding") for the proposed levy of the new assessments and the assessment range formula presented and described in this Report. In conjunction with this Ballot Proceeding, the Board will conduct a noticed public hearing to consider public testimonies, comments, and written protests regarding the levy of the proposed new assessments. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, property owner protest ballots received will be opened and tabulated to determine whether a majority protest exists:

A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property."
After completion of the ballot tabulation, the Board will confirm the results of the balloting. If a majority protest exists for the proposed new assessment, further proceedings to implement the new assessment for the District shall be abandoned. If tabulation of the ballots indicate that majority protest does not exist for the assessment and the assessment range formula ( inflationary adjustment) presented in the ballots and described in the Report, the Board may adopt this Report as submitted or amended), approve the assessment diagram, and confirm the assessments rate for fiscal year 2024/025 ("Initial Maximum Assessment") and the assessment range formula inflationary adjustment). Either in the same resolution or by a separate resolution, the Board may order the levy and collection of the District assessments commencing with fiscal year 2024/025 as approved, and such assessments shall be submitted to the San Joaquin County Auditor/ Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each affected parcel or be directly billed to the property owner if the County does not bill the parcel on the secured roll.

Engineer' sReport
This Engineer' sReport ("Report") has been prepared pursuant to Section 54716 of the 1982 Act and presented to the SJAFCA Board for its consideration and approval. This Report describes:

The boundaries of the District that incorporates each lot or parcel of property determined to receive special benefit from the Project Services;
An estimate of the total costs to fund the Project Services; The methodology for levying an assessment upon parcels that receive special benefit from the Project Services as defined within this Report; and, The levy and collection of the annual assessments to fund in part the costs and expenses to provide for the Project Services.

The budgeted expenses and assessments described in this Report are based on the anticipated annual funding required to support special benefit expenses associated with Project Services including incidental expenses associated with the formation and administration of the District. This Report does not address additional flood control improvements that may be installed and/ or expanded within the Mossdale Tract Area by RD 17, nor significant modifications to or extension of the levee improvements and/ or services identified in this Report.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 6

YY WI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
The word " parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor' sParcel Number (APN) by the San Joaquin County Assessor' sOffice. The San Joaquin County Auditor - Controller uses APNs and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District special benefit assessments.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Engineer' sReport is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,
Report and
such
each
decision
section,
shall
subsection,
not affect
subdivision,
the validity
sentence,
of the remaining
clause,
provisions of the Engineer' s
phrase or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

This Report consists of five (5) parts:

Part l
Plans and Specifications: This section provides an overall description of the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District and the Project Services to be funded in part by the District' sannual assessments. The assessments outlined in this Report are based on these improvements, materials, equipment, services, and activities authorized by the 1982 Act and that provide special benefit to the properties to be proportionally assessed. More detailed information regarding the specific improvements, facilities, operations, maintenance, services, and activities ( specific plans and specifications) for the District are on file in the offices of SJAFCA and by reference are made part of this Report.

Part 11
Estimate of Costs: An estimate of the total costs to fund the proposed Project and an estimate of the annual special benefit costs to be assessed to fund in part that Project. The budget outlined in this section includes an estimate of SJAFCA' s overall program costs including the costs associated with Project planning and program administration as well as the direct costs of the improvements needed to achieve ULOP. The budget also provides a summary of the Project funding sources including USACE' sportion of the Project (federal funding); state funding; and the local funding sources which includes, but is not limited to, Levee Impact Fees; EIFD Revenues; and Assessment Revenues from this District. Those Project Services and any other costs determined to be of general benefit shall not be assessed as special benefit costs and will be funded by one of the other revenue sources (Levee Impact Fees and/ or EIFD Revenues) available to SJAFCA or its member agencies.

Part 111
Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the Project Services to be provided within the District and outlines the method of calculating each parcel' s proportional special benefit and corresponding assessment.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 7
WWI San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Part IV
Assessment Roll: The Assessment Roll contains a listing of each Assessor' s Parcel Number to be assessed within the District for special benefits received (" Balloted Assessment") commencing in fiscal year 2024/025. The Balloted Assessment amount for each parcel is based on the parcel' scalculated proportional special benefit as outlined in " Part II — Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rate established by the estimated costs (budget) in "Part III — Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District ( over 23, 000 parcels), the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/025 has been filed electronically with the SJAFCA Board Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the APNs and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.

Part V
Assessment Diagram: This section of the Report contains a diagram showing the boundaries of the District, which incorporates the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the Project Services. The diagram also provides a visual depiction of the location and extent of the proposed project levees. Parcel identification, the lines, and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within the District are shown on the San Joaquin County Assessor' sParcel Maps and shall include any subsequent lot line adjustments or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the San Joaquin County Assessor' sParcel Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 8
WWI
Part I — Plans and Specifications
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
District Overview
The primary flood risk in the Mossdale Tract Area is from geotechnical failure or outflanking of the existing levees. Levee overtopping is also a risk during large floods, which are anticipated to increase in both intensity and frequency over time due to the effects of climate change.

Geotechnical failures caused by through -levee seepage or under -seepage are typically sudden and unpredictable and can produce large volumes of high velocity flood flows. These failures come with little warning, with minimal time for evacuation and emergency actions. Overtopping and flanking floods are much more predictable, so evacuation is more effective for these failure mechanisms.

The Mossdale Tract Area high water events generally occur during the winter months when colder air and water temperatures significantly increase the risk of death by exposure. The probability of unexpected levee failure ( coupled with the consequence of basin -wide flooding) presents a continued threat to public safety, property, and critical infrastructure in the Mossdale Tract Area .

To address this concern, in cooperation with and funding from the State of California, SJAFCA completed an Urban Flood Risk Reduction study ( UFRR Study) of alternatives and has commenced the environmental review and preliminary design of the preferred flood risk reduction Project for the area which was identified as being at risk of flooding from a 200 -year flood event, with this risk being significantly increased under future climate conditions. The UFRR Study included technical evaluations of hydraulics, geotechnical conditions, cost estimates of potential alternatives, levee performance, multi -benefit features, and others. The UFRR Study selected features of three initial alternatives to develop a hybrid alternative that could be evaluated and compared with the initial three alternatives. The California Department of Water Resources DWR") and local stakeholders each provided input for " Alternative 4". The differences were minor, but important, so Alternative 4 was presented with four minor permutations, represented as Alternatives 4a through 4d. The final selected alternative in the UFRR Study ( Alternative 4a) is the proposed Project summarized below to be analyzed in an Environmental Impact Report EIR), the preparation of which is ongoing and scheduled to be completed in 2025.

Separately, on September 30, 2022, SJAFCA executed a Feasibility Study Cost Share Agreement FCSA) with the USAGE to evaluate the Federal Interest in an array of alternatives to provide enhanced flood protection to the Lathrop and Manteca area. While Federal interest in the Mossdale Program is being evaluated, given the level of study and evaluation completed to date by SJAFCA and the State, SJAFCA continues to advance design and permitting of certain common features of the UFRR Study preferred alternative that will overlap with what is expected to be improvements authorized by Congress and constructed by USACE.

Project Location
The Mossdale Tract Area ( proposed District) covers approximately 22, 400 acres and includes RD 17 ( 16,10 acres), portions of the Cities of Stockton, Lathrop, Manteca, and unincorporated San Joaquin County ( see Figure 1 on page 2 for a general overview of the jurisdictions within the Mossdale Tract Area). The existing RD 17 levee system is comprised of Federal Project levees also referred to as State Plan of Flood Control [ SPFC]) along the San Joaquin River and French Camp Slough, which form the west and north borders of RD 17, and a dryland levee to the south.

The land generally slopes east to west and south to north, and there is no levee along the east Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 9
ry WILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
side of the RD 17 jurisdiction, so the interior drainage watershed extends to the east of RD 17.

The proposed project area includes the SPFC levees, RD 17' sdryland levee, the Mossdale Tract Area , and areas to the south and west along the San Joaquin River identified for the potential development of ecosystem restoration features.

The territory within the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District is narrowly defined to include those parcels within San Joaquin County that have been identified as parcels that will receive a reduced flood risk as a result of the implementation of Project Services and the related flood control infrastructure improvements. The boundaries of the District and the parcels therein are based on hydrologic and hydraulic mapping ( i.e., floodplain mapping), incorporating each of the parcels that have been identified as receiving a reduced risk of potential flood damages as a result of uncontrolled riverine flooding. Based on the floodplain mapping data, the District includes approximately 22, 115 parcels located in portions of the cities of Lathrop, Manteca, Stockton, and unincorporated areas of San Joaquin County that are protected from flooding by the Project Services.

Project Objectives
To comply with State and Federal requirements, the overall objective of the proposed Project is to provide increased public safety benefits by improving and expanding flood risk reduction infrastructure to achieve a 200 -year Urban Level of Flood Protection (" ULOP") for the Mossdale Tract Area . Objectives include:

Modernize the flood risk reduction infrastructure to accommodate future performance and climate change resiliency goals identified in the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan and in SJAFCA' sadopted Climate Change Adaptation Policy. 2
Improve long- term operations, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement OMRR& R) over time.

Proposed Project
The proposed Project would include the construction and operation of flood risk reduction components in and adjacent to the Mossdale Tract Area . As an outcome of the UFRR Study, preliminary plans have been developed to achieve the stated Project objectives. Each of the preliminary identified components, as conceptualized in the UFRR Study, are described in more detail in the following. It should be noted that, as the identified Project advances through environmental review and design, the current identified components of the Project may change and be refined to meet the stated Project Objectives. Project Services include the final designed Project to be implemented, that meets the stated Project Objectives. The Project described herein and by reference, including all attributes of the Project such as cost estimates and schedule for implementation, is reflective of the best information currently available to SJAFCA and the assessment engineer.
2 San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 19- 06: Resolution to Adopt Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA in Light of Climate Change Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 10

WWII LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' s Report, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Flood Risk Reduction Components
Flood risk reduction components of the proposed Project include: ( 1) fix in place and potential setback levee improvements; and ( 2) a dryland levee extension. Each of these components, along with associated construction techniques are described in detail below. Details of the Project sites are described in Table 1 below and illustrated in Figure 2 on page 12 that follows.

TABLE 1 — PROJECT FEATURES
Project ID
1 Main Project Feature
Cutoff Wall
Station
Begin
119+ 50
Station
End
148+ 00
Length
feet)
2, 850
2 Cutoff Wall 172+ 45 192+ 00 1, 955
3 Seepage Berm 190+ 5 247+ 00 5, 650
4 Seepage Berm 255+ 50 259+ 50 400
5 Seepage Berm 270+ 0 297+ 75 2, 775
6 Cutoff Wall 311+ 00 362+ 50 5, 150
7 Cutoff Wall 388+ 00 518+0 13, 050

8. a Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River / Cutoff Wall 570+ 0 758+ 00 18, 800

8. b Levee Raise / Floodw all @ San Joaquin River 758+ 00 769+ 01 1,01

8. c Levee Raise / Floodw all @ San Joaquin River 770+5 778+ 50 775

8. d Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River / Cutoff Wall 778+ 50 799+ 61 2, 111

8. e Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River 799+ 822+0 2, 301
9( 1) Cutoff Wall
10() Cutoff Wall
11 Levee Raise @ Walthall Slough 822+0 853+ 96 3, 116
12 Levee Raise & Seepage Berm @ Dryland Levee 853+ 96 908+ 60 5, 464 13( 3) Erosion Repairs
14( 4) Right -of -Way Acquisition
15 Dryland Levee Extension 908+ 60 1030+ 5 12,90
Notes:
1) Project ID 9 consists of a cutoff w all and is included as a component of Project ID 8. a. 2) Project ID 10 consists of a cutoff w all and is included as a component of Project ID 8. d. 3) Project ID 13 consists of various erosion repair sites along the existing RD 17 levee. The individual erosion repair sites have been incorporated into the other adjacent projects. 4) Project ID 14 consists of right -of -w
ay acquisition for existing RD 17 facilities in order to comply w ith ULDC requirements. It does not include a construction component.

Source : Environnemental Science Associates ( ESA) 2022 Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 11

WI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' s Report, Fiscal Year 2024/025
FIGURE 2 — PROJECT LEVEES
oN Miles
721
Lathrop
Stockton
City Limits
Existing Levee Alignment
Project Elements
Cutoff Wall
Seepage Berm
Potential Setback Levee
Levee Raise
Dryland Levee Extension
Waterside Rock Slope
Protection
VZj Staging Areas
Manteca
SOURCE MAXAR, 2021, KSN, 2022, PBP, 2022, ESA, 2022 Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Protect Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 12

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Fix in Place and Potential Setback Levee Improvements
The fix in place levee improvements that would be constructed, operated, and maintained within the levee rights -of -way and easements under the proposed Project currently include:

Reconstruction ( raising and widening) or replacement of the existing dryland levee, including the construction of seepage control measures such as a drained seepage berm or cutoff wall, and reconstruction of pipe penetrations that cross the levee.

Installation of a traditional soil- bentonite slurry cutoff wall of varying depth along portions of the existing levee alignment.

Installation of a drained seepage berm of varying width along portions of the existing levee alignment.

Placement of riprap rock slope protection on the waterside of the levee along portions of the existing levee alignment.

Removal of high hazard encroachments.

Reconstruction of pipe penetrations that cross the levee.

Raising the height of levee along portions of the existing levee alignment and extension of the Iandside toe to meet levee slope design standards.

Construction of a dryland levee extension, including the construction of seepage control measures such as a drained seepage berm or cutoff wall.

Construction of a potential setback levee to meet ULOP standards at a designated sharp bend in the San Joaquin River and connecting to existing levee segments.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 13

WWII LLDAN
Part I1— Estimate of Costs
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
In January 2018, after the SJAFCA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement was amended to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, SJAFCA took over the role of the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) for the Mossdale Tract Area and the associated responsibility for annually reporting on the status of Adequate Progress toward ULOP for the Area to the CVFPB.

Government Code § 65007 ( a) et. seq. defines Adequate Progress and sets forth the requirement of the LFMA to annually report to the CVFPB. The definition of Adequate Progress includes the requirement that revenues ( i.e., sources of funding) have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities. SJAFCA has interpreted this requirement to mean that its Annual Reports must present a financing plan that lays out and demonstrates that the identified revenues are sufficient to cover the costs of implementing the Project that has been developed to meet appropriate standard of protection within the identified schedule.

SJAFCA' s most recent " Mossdale Tract Program: 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Protection" ("Annual APR") being prepared will identify the costs and sources of revenues for the overall program being advanced by SJAFCA. The costs of the program, which make up the Project, sources of revenues, as well as the financing plan presented in Annual APR are hereby incorporated into this Engineer' s Report by reference. The Project costs presented in the Annual APR are summarized below.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 14
1/ VWILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Proposed Project Budget
The following table (Table 2) summarizes the Mossdale Tract Program Costs identified activities and improvements included within the Project Services.

TABLE 2: MOSSDALE TRACT PROGRAM COSTS
Project Budget Costs
ULOP Program Planning & Implementation
Pre -Project Expenses ( Actuals)
SJAFCA Program Management
Funding Implementation
Feasibility Study & Planning
Subtotal: ULOP Program Planning & Implementation
SJAFCA ULOP Project Costs
Soft Costs including Administration
Construction Costs
Right -of -Way
Contingency
Multi - Benefit Improvements
Subtotal: SJAFCA ULOP Project Costs
Total: ULOP Program Planning & Project Costs
less) USACE Implemented Improvements
Net SJAFCA ULOP Project Costs
3, 200, 000
3, 600, 000
1, 500, 000
3, 200, 000
11, 500, 000
90, 610, 000
183, 500, 000
94,00, 000
59, 690, 000
44, 170, 000
472, 870, 000
484, 370, 000
248, 800, 000)
235, 570, 000
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 15

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Proposed Project Funding
The following table ( Table 3) summarizes the Project Funding Sources identified within the Annual APR to pay the Project Costs and provide Project Services. The Project Funding Sources include the assessment revenues to be generated by the District as well as the proceeds of debt planned to be incurred by SJAFCA ( assumed to be Assessment Revenue Bonds) net of the associated principal and interest costs ( i.e., debt service carry).

TABLE 3: PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES
Project Funding Sources
Non -Local / State Funding
State UFRR Funding ( PED Only)
State Funding ( BCP - 0000743)
State Funding ( Future Share of NFS - LPPA)
Subtotal: Non -Local / State Funding
SJAFCA Project Funding
Developer Advances/ City Funding
Development Fee Program
SJAFCA Overlay Assessment District
Net EIFD Revenues
Future Assessment Overlay Financing ( Bond Proceeds)
Assessment Overlay Financing ( Debt Service Carry)
Subtotal: SJAFCA Project Funding
Total: Project Funding Sources
Net SJAFCA ULOP Project Costs
Total Project Sources less Uses
3, 800, 000
75, 000,00
35, 000,00
113, 800, 000
3, 560, 000
67, 350, 000
33,70, 000
21, 640, 000
31, 890, 000
25, 320, 00)
132, 490, 000
246,90, 000
235, 570, 000)
10, 720, 000
Financing Plan / Assessment Budget
The Annual APR presents a plan prepared for the implementation of the Program. The Annual APR identified the following underlying financing plan assumptions.

SJAFCA has established the following funding mechanisms:

A Regional DIF program collecting revenues in 2018 and updated in 2022.

A new EIFD covering the properties directly benefiting from the project. The EIFD has a base year of fiscal year 2021/022 and started receiving revenues in fiscal year 2022/023.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 16

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
The District would be in place to commence collecting revenues in fiscal year 2024/025.

The above revenues would be utilized, on a pay- as- you- go basis, to fund the design, federal feasibility study cost share, work in kind, right of way acquisition, and advance improvements.

State Grant Funding would be available from the Department of Water Resource to cost share match the above soft costs and implementation action ahead of Federal authorization and USACE construction of improvements.

SJAFCA would approve the issuance of bonds leveraging District revenues in fiscal year 2025/6.

The proceeds from the bond would be used to fund land acquisition and construction costs of Dryland Levee and advance improvements in partnership with State Grant funding.

Based on the Cash Flow Analysis included within the Annual APR, which is based on a schedule of expenses and available revenues, given the best available information at the time of formation of the District, the resulting budget needed to come from the District in fiscal year 2024/5 is 2, 625, 000. This amount of revenue would provide the needed revenues on an annual basis going forward, to ensure that the Project' sprojected expenditures needs can be met to provide Project Services.

Authorized Term / Use of Revenues
Because the financing plan assumption contemplates the use of debt financing, the District revenues secured to meet cash flow and debt service needs must be authorized through the final year of the term of the financing. Because a Bond issuance is expected to take place in fiscal year 2025/6, the assessments will be levied through fiscal year 2055/ 56. The assessments would cease to be levied after July 1, 2056.

Assessment revenues, after the completion of the Project, would be utilized to fund both debt service ( principal and interest) as well as the annual costs of administration of the District and ongoing operations and maintenance of the Project improvements.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 17
VVWILLDAN San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Part 111 — Method of Apportionment
Benefit Analysis
The nearly twelve and a half miles ( 12. 39 miles) of proposed fix in place and potential setback levee improvements ( cutoff walls, seepage berms, and raised levees along the San Joaquin River; and the two miles ( 2. 31 miles) dryland levee extension levees to the south are the first line of defense against riverine flooding from the San Joaquin River for the Mossdale Tract Area . The proposed project levee improvements and services are intended to provide a level of flood protection that is necessary to withstand flooding that has a 1 - in -200 chance of occurring in any given year using criteria consistent with, or developed by, the California Department of Water Resources and which will ultimately reduce potential flooding and damage to properties within the District boundaries.

The analysis and findings outlined in this Report and the resulting method of apportionment and assessment rate structure is focused on establishing a reasonable and appropriate benefit nexus both general and special benefits) consistent with the provisions of the 1982 Act, Proposition 218 Article XIII D of the California Constitution), and case law regarding assessments. The method of apportionment and resulting proportional special benefit assessments for this District are based on the premise that the proposed Project Services are necessary and essential to minimize potential flood risks and associated flood damages to the land, structure, and contents of parcels within the Mossdale Tract Area . Therefore, the formulas used for calculating assessments as described herein reflect both the composition and characteristics of each parcel within the District, the reduced flood level and the resulting calculated flood damage reduction benefits to those parcels that directly result from the Project Services to be funded in part by the special benefit assessments.

To levy an assessment for these property -related flood control services, the California Constitution requires the local agency imposing the assessment ( SJAFCA) to comply with the following:

Identify and include in the District all parcels that will have special benefits conferred on them by the improvements, facilities and/ or services.

Only special benefits are assessable, and the agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.

Calculate the proportional special benefit for each parcel in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost, the maintenance, and operation expenses of a public improvement, and/ orthe cost of the property related service being funded.

No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

Special Benefit
Essentially, the primary function of SJAFCA and the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District is to provide a collective and coordinated benefit funding source to support a portion of the cost to construct and enhance the levee improvements, necessary to ensure reduced potential flood damages to structures, the contents of those structures, and the land associated with the parcels within the Mossdale Tract Area that receive a particular and distinct benefit from the Project Services. As previously noted, the District boundary has been narrowly defined based on Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 18

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
floodplain mapping data to include each identified parcel that will receive a reduced risk of flood damages as a result of the Project implementation. The proposed Project Services are intended to provide 200 -year protection to parcels within the District due to flood flows from the San Joaquin River or its tributaries based on the ULDC Design floodplain which includes an additional factor of safety to account for future climate uncertainty. The Project Services also incorporate necessary geotechnical improvements and expansion of the easements and/ or rights -of -way along the levees that incorporate added project resiliency beyond the ULDC Design floodplain event, as prescribed in SJAFCA' sClimate Adaptation policy.

The special benefits to parcels ( avoided flood risk) within the District associated the Project Services that complies with strict State and Federal standards and regulations include but are not limited to:

Continued level of flood protection for the areas protected by the Project Services.

Continued assurance of reduced potential flood damages to structures, content of those structures, and land.

Continued avoidance of costs associated with failure to meet regulatory requirements, such as mandated flood insurance for any property with a federally backed mortgage and/ or building restrictions.

Allowance for best and full use of properties within the District by permitting local governments to implement general plans for urban and urbanizing areas with appropriate levels of flood protection.

Protection of the local economy by creating construction jobs and related spending, sustaining property values, and allowing for responsible residential, commercial, and industrial development.

Retention of Federal assistance during or following a flood emergency or repair of levee break.

Ultimately, both public and privately owned parcels within this narrowly defined District boundary will receive a particular and distinct benefit over and above any general benefits the Project Services provide to the general public or properties in general. It is clear the assessed parcels directly benefit from the proposed Project Services and while the majority of the funding is coming from other sources, without the proposed special benefit assessment revenue, the Project Services will lack the funding required to construct the improvements and the parcels within the District could be negatively impacted by the following:

Greater flood risk resulting in increased risk of property damage and loss of life due to flooding.

Loss of FEMA low -to -moderate risk flood zone designation would result in higher FEMA National Flood Insurance Program ( NFIP) premiums, mandatory flood insurance, and building restrictions.

Loss of federal assistance during or following a flood emergency, such as repair of a levee break.

The inability to comply with Senate Bill 5 and Urban Level of Flood protection requirements resulting in development restrictions.

While properties within the District will derive substantially similar special benefits from the Project Services ( improvements, services and activities necessary to ensure reduced flood damages to structures, the contents of structures, and land), the special benefit ( particular and distinct benefit) Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 19
WWI San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
for each parcel is proportional to the potential flood damages specifically and directly related to each parcel' s potential flood depth and development characteristics ( i.e. land use, structure size, and land size).

General Benefit
Based on the proposed Project Services and activities to be funded by District assessments and relationship to properties to be assessed, it is evident that the improvements are necessary and directly impact developed properties, agricultural properties, as well as the potential development of properties. Furthermore, because the flood control improvements protect identifiable parcels from damage due to inundation or force by arising floodwaters, the benefits are direct and particular to those parcels ( special benefit), and to none other. In addition, because the flood control improvements to be funded by the District assessments protect specific parcels (narrowly defined boundaries) from potential flood damage and the fact that the flood damage benefit for each parcel is measurable, the benefits to these assessed parcels are clearly direct and display particular benefit ( proportional special benefits). However, it is also recognized that flood mitigation services and activities also directly or indirectly provide some measure of benefit to properties in general and to the public at large ( general benefit) in the form of continued safe access and travel through the District area.

The Project Services will provide a general benefit to real property, residents, and the public generally in the form of continued safe access and travel through the District area. Prevention of flooding of public infrastructure within the District, such as roads, easements, and various rights - of -way, benefit the assessed parcels generally with respect to access and travel, and also facilitates general public services such as police and fire protection access. Protection of such infrastructure through Project Services therefore provides a general benefit both to people and properties within and outside of the District. Property associated with such public infrastructure improvements and facilities are typically not assigned Assessor' sParcel Numbers. The acreage associated with most of these public infrastructures, compared to the acreage of Assessor assigned parcels within the District, provides a reasonable and quantifiable measure of the proportional general benefit and general benefit costs associated with the Project Services.

The total net benefit parcel acreage within the District boundaries is approximately 14, 317 acres of which approximately 12, 820 acres are assessed County Assessor designated parcels (APNs) with the remaining 1, 497 acres being comprised of common area properties ( shared interest by other assessed properties), public infrastructure improvements and facilities that may include, but is not limited to: public streets, easements, rights -of -way, and other public -lands including wetlands, canals, channel ways, open spaces, preserves, and other similar restricted -use public areas or properties that are subject to the State Board of Equalization restrictions. Such properties are considered to receive no direct or quantifiable flood risk reduction from the Project Services and these 1, 497 acres or approximately 10. 46% of the total 14, 317 acres, reflects a reasonable and quantifiable measure of the proportional general benefit both to people and properties within the District and the proportional general benefit costs associated with the Project Services. These general benefit costs shall be excluded from the special benefit assessment funding and not assessed to the parcels within the District.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 20

W WILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Assessment Methodology (Special Benefit Calculations)
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property' srelative share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The proposed flood control improvements to be constructed as part of Project Services to be funded in part by the assessments are intended to provide long- term avoidance of damage to structures, content within the structures, and land for all parcel potentially flooded based on the ULDC Design floodplain hydrology ( Zone 1 parcels). However, based on SJAFCA' s
adopted Climate Adaptation policy and the associated
resulting floodplain hydrology, additional parcels ( Zone 2 parcels) could also be impacted if flood levels exceed the ULDC Design event. Consistent with the Climate Adaptation Policy, geotechnical and right of way design criteria are based on a more conservative Climate Adaptation floodplain hydrology thereby allowing for the height of the levees to be increased more readily in the future as needed based on evolving climate science and future flood flow projections. The assessment engineer has determined that the relative share of the Damages Avoided ( special benefits) conferred to these Zone 2 parcels by the funded improvements and services is best reflected by the land damage associated with those parcels only. Based on combined ULDC Design floodplain and Climate Adaptation floodplain, the overall uncontrolled riverine flooding for the Mossdale Tract Area without the Project Services is illustrated in Figure 3, on page 22 that follows. This figure also illustrates the boundaries of Zone 1 ( parcels incorporated in the District based on ULDC Design floodplain hydrology) and the boundaries of Zone 2 ( parcels incorporated in the District based on Climate Adaptation floodplain hydrology).

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 21

WWII LLDAN
Figure 3: Without Project Flood Depth Ranges
Legend
Zone 1
Zone 2
Flood Depth
1- Less than 1 F
2-1. 01to2 Ft
3- 2. 01 to 4 Ft
4-. 01 to 6 Ft
5-6. 01to8Ft
6 - 8, 01 to 10 Ft
7- 10. 01to 12 Ft
8- 12. 01 to 14 F
9 - Over 14 Ft
Date 2/7/1
li/V VI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 22
WWI San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
The Damages Avoided method of assessment apportionment is utilized in this District and establishes a Total Damages Avoided for each parcel based on the combined Structure Damage, Content Damage, and Land Damage reduction benefit calculated for each parcel In Zone 1 and Total Damages Avoided for each parcel in Zone 2 based on the Land Damage reduction benefit calculated for those parcels. The proportional special benefit calculation for each parcel considers these three factors independently. The benefit calculation can be summarized as follows:

Special Benefits = Damages Avoided
Zone 1 Parcels)
Damages Avoided = Structure Damage + Content Damage + Land Damage Zone 2 Parcels)
Damages Avoided = Land Damage
Structure and Content Damage
The damage avoided to structures and the content of those structures is derived by determining the amount of flood depth reduction experienced by each particular parcel and the protection provided as a result of the Project Services.

Determining the avoided damages to structures and contents requires considering the following factors:

Relative Structure and Content Value
Flood Depth Reduction
Percentage of Flood Damage Reduction
Structure Size
Relative Structure and Content Value
The United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) has identified the potential flood damages to structures by the following general land use categories:

Residential — Physical damages to dwelling units ( single- family, multifamily, and mobile homes) and to residential contents, including household items and personal property.

Commercial — Structure value and content value damages ( to commercial and public buildings), including equipment and furniture, supplies, merchandise, and other items used in the conduct of business.

Industrial — Losses from inundation of industrial properties, including warehouses, consisting of fixtures and equipment, inventory, and structure.

Agricultural — Non- residential structures on agricultural properties would experience damage to equipment, tools, supplies, livestock, feed, seed, chemicals, and other items used for agricultural purposes and business.

To reflect differences related to flood damages to structures and their content, Relative Structure and Content Values for residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural structures shown in the following table ( Table 4) are utilized. The residential, commercial, and industrial structure and content values were originally determined using USACE data developed in connection with an Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 23

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' s Report, Fiscal Year 2024/025
American River Watershed Investigation (1) and the content values for agricultural structures were derived from a related technical report (2). The Relative Structure Values shown in Table 4 are used in the assessment methodology to reflect the relative structure and content value relationships between land use categories ( proportional benefit). These values represent gross averages for the different land uses and do not represent assessed values or current market values for an individual structure.

TABLE 4: RELATIVE STRUCTURE AND CONTENT VALUE
Land Use
Residential
Relative
Structure Value
Sqft)
60 Relative
Content Value
Sgft)
30 Residential - Mobile Home 30 15
Commercial ( Public & Private) 70 75
Industrial ( Public & Private) 50 58
Agricultural 50 30
1) US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), American River Watershed Investigation, California Feasibility Report, Sacramento District, December 1991. 2) US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Draft Economic Re- evaluation Report, American River Watershed Project, Appendix D, Attachment II, Technical Report, May 2007.

Flood Depth Reduction
The proposed Project Services for the Mossdale Tract Area will be designed to provide 200 -year protection with additional project resiliency to account for future climate uncertainties. Accordingly, both the boundaries of the proposed District and the flood depth reductions attributed to the benefiting parcels within those boundaries have been determined using hydraulic models to estimate the floodplains associated with the ULDC Design event and Climate Adaptation event.

The floodplain estimates were prepared by R&F Engineering, Inc., a consulting engineering firm retained by SJAFCA to complete hydraulic modeling for the Mossdale Tract Area .

The relative flood depths of each parcel in the ULDC Design Floodplain event were determined and categorized by establishing 2 -foot flood depth ranges for the Zone 1 boundary. Using the GIS information to determine parcel elevations, parcels were able to be slotted into 2 -foot flood depth ranges. The overall boundaries of the District and the flood depth ranges shown in Figure 4, on page 25 that follows, were derived from parcel elevation data, flood elevation data, and flood depths developed by hydraulic modeling of possible levee failures along the proposed levee system.

Based on this mapping and the underlying data, relative flood depths were established by grouping every parcel into one of nine flood depth ranges ( flood depth ranges 1-9) based on the flood depth map.

The nine flood depth ranges include depths two feet or less ( 0.0 to 2. 00 feet); greater than two feet and up to four feet (2. 01 to 4. 00 feet); greater than four feet and up to six feet (4. 01 to 6. 00 feet); greater than six feet and up to eight feet (6. 01 to 8. 00 feet); greater than eight feet and up to ten feet (8. 01 to

10. 00 feet); greater than ten feet and up to twelve feet ( 10. 01 to 12. 00 feet); greater than twelve feet and up to fourteen feet ( 12. 01 to 14. 00 feet); and greater than fourteen feet (14. 01 feet or greater).

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 24
WWI
Figure 4: Flood Depth Ranges
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
egend
Pvlossdale OAD Bounda

FLOOD DEPTH RANGES
1 - Less than 1 Ft
2-1. 01 to 2 Ft
3 2. 01 to 4 Ft
4 4. 01 to 6 Ft
5-6. 01to8Ft
6-8. 01to10Ft
7- 10. 01to12Ft
8- 12. 01to14Ft
9- Over 14 Ft
f'J'-~.^ Yf', 1^.' y:Jf,-tJ:r ::( _
f::;.• tl^.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 25

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Percentage of Flood Damage Reduction
The relationship between depth of flooding and damages to structure and contents is calculated for each land use category with structures ( residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural) and flood depth ranges within the District were compiled by Willdan based on Peterson Brustad Inc ( PBI)' sanalysis in their Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Economic and Life Loss Evaluation, November 7, 2019. The estimated depth of flooding ( Flood Depth Range) for the District parcels were determined using average elevations of the parcels and water surface elevations in the event of flooding with no improvements implemented. Structure and Content Damage Percentages for each land use category were taken directly from the 2012 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, which originally were developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers USACE, 2008). The relation between depth of flooding and damage to structures is illustrated in Table 5 below and in Table 6 on the next page for damage to contents within those structures.

TABLE 5: PERCENT DAMAGE TO STRUCTURE
Land Use
Single Family 1 Story
1 Less than or
equal to 1

10. 58%
2 1. 01 tot

27. 70%
3 2. 01 to 4

43. 60%
Flood
4 4. 01 to 6

55. 90%
Depth Ranges
5 6. 01 to 8

65. 20%
6 8. 01 to 1010. 01

71. 85%
7 to 1212. 01

76. 30%
8 to 14

79. 00%
9 Over 14. 01

80. 20%
Single Family 2 Story or more 7.0% 18. 06%28. 85%38. 45%46. 85%54. 05%60. 05%64. 85% 67. 70% Multifamily 1 Story 10. 58% 27. 70%43. 60%55. 90%65. 20%71. 85%76. 30%79. 00% 80. 20% Multifamily 2 Story or more 7.0% 18. 06%28. 85%38. 45%46. 85%54. 05%60. 05%64. 85%67. 70% Mobile Home 8. 00% 57. 75%96. 00%96. 00%96. 00%96. 00%96. 00%96. 00%96. 00% Commercial - Auto 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40% 86. 00% Commercial - Grocery Store 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Hospital 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Hotel 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Medical 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40% 86. 00% Commercial - Office 1 Story 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Office 2 Story 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40% 86. 00% Commercial - Restaurants 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Fast Food 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Retail 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0% 76. 40% 86. 00% Commercial - Service Auto 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Shopping Center 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Day Care 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Commercial - Elder Care 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0% 76. 40% 86. 00% Commercial - MISC 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Industrial - Heavy Manufacturing 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Industrial - Light Manufacturing 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0% 76. 40% 86. 00% Industrial - Warehouse 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Public - Fire Station 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0% 76. 40% 86. 00% Public - Misc. 7.00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Public - GOV 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Public - Recreation 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0% 76. 40%86. 00% SCHOOL 7. 00% 24.5%31. 25%34. 20%43. 00%51. 80%63.0%76. 40%86. 00% Agriculture 9. 33% 20. 51%28. 68%35.4%43. 04%45. 29%47. 15%48.8% 49. 92% Source: PBI Technical Memorandum Appendix B ' Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Economic and Life Loss Evaluation," November 7, 2019, as compiled by Willdan Financial Services. Depth Damage percent were grouped into 2 -feet flood depth ranges.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 26
WW1I LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' s Report, Fiscal Year 2024/025
TABLE 6: PERCENT DAMAGE TO CONTENTS
Land Use
Single Family 1 Story
1 Less than or
equal to 1

2. 80%
2 1. 01 to 2

7. 90%
3 2. 01 to 4

13.0%
Flood
4 4. 01 to 6

18. 30%
Depth Ranges
5 6. 01 to 8

20. 65%
6 8. 01 to 10

22. 50%
7 10. 01 to 12

22. 50%
8 12. 01 to 14

22. 50%
9 Over 14. 01

23. 40%
Single Family 2 Story or more 1. 50% 5. 30%9. 35%13. 70%16. 50%18. 40%19. 50% 20. 50% 21. 60% Multifamily 1 Story 2. 80% 7. 90% 13.0%18. 30%20. 65%22. 50%22. 50%22. 50% 23. 40% Multifamily 2 Story or more 1. 50% 5. 30%9. 35%13. 70%16. 50%18. 40%19. 50% 20. 50% 21. 60% Mobile Home 42. 50% 88. 50%99. 00%99. 00%99. 00%99. 00%99. 00%99. 00%99. 00% Commercial - Auto 17. 50% 85. 48%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Grocery Store 61. 04% 90. 86%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Hospital 50. 00% 87. 75%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Hotel 47. 36% 95. 67%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Medical 50. 00% 57. 75%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Office 1 Story 48. 39% 98. 39%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Office 2 Story 42. 89% 49. 38%55. 97%55. 97%55. 97%66. 87%68. 08% 98. 16%100. 00% Commercial - Restaurants 47. 36% 95. 67%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Fast Food 45. 10%93.0%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Retail 42. 71% 87. 31%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Service Auto 17.5%85. 48%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Shopping Center 86. 18%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Day Care 76. 45% 97. 76%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Elder Care 76. 45% 97.6%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Commercial - Misc. 86. 18% 100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Industrial - Heavy Manufacturing 22. 44%61. 88%88. 74%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Industrial - Light Manufacturing 66. 50% 94. 59%99. 49%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Industrial - Warehouse 62. 76%97. 21%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Public - Fire Station 68. 89% 100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Public - Misc. 68. 89%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Public - GOV 72. 58%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Public - Recreation 73. 97%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% SCHOOL 68. 89%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Agricultural 12. 89%42. 96%87. 36%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00%100. 00% Source: RBI Technical Memorandum, Appendix B " Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Economic and Life Loss Evaluation," November 7, 2019, as compiled by Willdan Financial Services. Depth Damage percent were grouped into 2 -feet flood depth ranges.

The above functional relationships between flood depth and structure and content damages provides a reasonable and proportional measurement for the flood -damage reduction benefit received by developed properties as a result of the Project Services.

For example, in the case of a single story single- family residential home on a parcel that experiences a flood -depth reduction of 5 feet, the damage reduction can be determined by looking at the depth -damage percentage for a single story single- family residential structure in the range that includes 5 feet. The damage percentage at 4. 01 to 6 -foot range is 55. 90 percent for the structure and 18. 30 percent for contents.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 27
WWI San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Structure Size
Flood damages to structures and their contents are calculated for each benefiting parcel in the District using the actual structural square footage, up to one hundred thousand square feet 100, 00 sf), for the first and second stories of residential structures, the first story of commercial, industrial, and agricultural structures, and appropriate structure value and depth -percent damage relationships for the particular land use. Upon review of the overall benefiting parcels within the District, it has been determined that less than five -tenths of a percent ( 0. 47%) of the parcels have structures that exceed 100, 00 sf and the potential flood level reduction for these parcels can vary significantly. Therefore, the Assessment Engineer has determined that the overall potential damages to structure and contents for square footages in excess of 100, 00 sf becomes less a function of the building square footage and more a function of flood depth reduction and it is reasonable and appropriate to limit the square footage used to calculate proportional special benefit for structure and content damages to one hundred thousand square feet.

Structure size was determined for each benefiting parcel within the boundaries of the District based on data obtained from the County Assessor' sparcel data either directly or through third party sources. For those properties identified with a structure or structures, based on either aerial imagery, or assessed improvement values being assigned by the County Assessor, for which no specific structure detail information was available, the footprint of the structure or structures were measured by Willdan using GIS and available aerial imagery.

Application of Structure and Content Damage Calculation As stated above, both the relative structure and content damage are calculated for each individual parcel in the proposed District based on the specific attributes for the parcel, i.e., land use type, structure size, and flood -depth reduction.

Structure and Content Damage Avoided = Structure Damage + Content Damage Structure Damage = Building SF x Relative Structure Value x Depth % Content Damage = Building SF x Relative Content Value x Depth For example, the relative structure and contents damages of a single story single- family residential structure with a square footage of 2, 000 square feet (sf) located in flood depth range

4. 01 to 6 foot would be calculated as follows:

Structure Damage = 2, 000 sf x $60/ sf x 55. 90% = $ 67, 080 Content Damage = 2, 000 sf x $ 30/ sf x 18. 30% = $ 10, 980 Structure and Content Damage Avoided = $67, 080 + $10, 980 = $78, 060 78, 060 would represent the relative structure and content damage benefit experienced by the example parcel presented. This benefit plus the relative land damage benefit is used to determine the total relative benefit of the parcel proportional to other parcels in the benefit area (the District).

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 28
1/ VWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Land Damage
There are several factors that may contribute to the flood damage reduction benefit to land, both vacant and improved. These include, but are not limited to, avoidance of physical damage to the land during a flood, the ability to secure financing for development projects, reduced cost of flood insurance, changes to the full and best land use of the property, preservation of land values, avoidance of damage to crops or other related impacts to agricultural operations, reduced cost of improvements, and the ability to access the property. The factors that impact the land damage calculation include:

Relative Land Damage Factor
Parcel Size
Relative Land Damage Factor
The benefit to land in the District is proportional to the relative land value. To account for the benefit received by the land and to weight this benefit appropriately with respect to the relative structure and content damage benefit, each benefiting property in the District is assigned a relative land damage per acre or a Land Damage Factor. This Land Damage Factor is based on the average land value within a given land use classification multiplied by a land value percentage, which is a weighted ratio of the average land value within that land use classification to the total property value of those same types of properties. Benefiting parcels in the District can be categorized into five of the six broader land use classifications which have been identified for structural and content damages including residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and public properties. ( For purposes of calculating land damages, each vacant parcel is assigned to an appropriate land use classification based on county use code designation assigned by the County Assessor' sOffice or other available sources and all residential properties including residential mobile homes are grouped together as residential).

Relative Land Damage per Acre = Land Damage Factor
Land Value Percentage = Total Land Value / Total land and Improvement Value for all parcels in each land use classification)
Average Land Value = Total Land Value / Total Acreage
for all parcels in each land use classification)
Land Damage Factor = Average Land Value x Land Value Percentage Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 29
WWI San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Table 7 below displays the results of the above Relative Land Damage Factor per Acre or Land Damage Factor calculation for each land use calculation:

TABLE 7: RELATIVE LAND DAMAGE PER ACRE
Land Use
Residential
Relative Land
Damage/ Acre
acre
80, 100
Commercial ( Public & Private) 91, 600
Industrial ( Public & Private) 27, 100
Argricultural 7, 000
General Benefit 30, 000
Source: San Joaquin County Secured Roll, July 2019 as compiled by Willdan Financial Services.

The applicable Relative Land Damage Factor per Acre above is multiplied by each parcel' s acreage, up to twenty acres, to establish the parcel' sland damage avoided value. These land damage factor value estimates considered land alone, exclusive of any building or structural improvements. The values derived are not actual assessed values or market values for any individual parcel of land; rather, they represent the relative value relationship between various land use classifications for the property in the benefit area ( the District). Similar to the building square footage limit applied for structural and content damage reduction benefits above, based on a review of the overall benefiting parcels within the District, less than nine -tenths of a percent

0. 82%) of the parcels within the District have acreage that exceed twenty acres ( 20. 00 acres) and the potential flood level reduction for these parcels varies significantly. Therefore, the Assessment Engineer has determined that the proportional land damages for acreage in excess of 20. 00 acres becomes less a function of the acreage and more a function of the parcel' sflood depth reduction and the acreage used to calculate proportional special benefit has been limited to 20. 00 acres.

Parcel Size
Flood damages to land are calculated for each benefiting parcel in the District using the acreage for the parcel in question and the associated land use code as identified by the respective County Assessor' srecords or other available sources including GIS measurements if the County Assessor' s records provide no acreage information. To the extent that a parcel may only be partially within the benefit area, only the portion of the parcel' sacreage in the area is included in the land damage calculation.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 30

W WILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Application of Land Damage Calculation
As stated above, land damage is calculated for each individual parcel in the District based on the specific attributes for the parcel, i.e., land use type and parcel size/ acreage.

Land Damage Avoided = Acreage x Relative Land Damage Factor As an example:

The Land Damage Avoided for a residential single- family property on a 7, 800 square foot lot

0. 179 acres) would be calculated as follows:

Land Damage Avoided = 0. 179 Acres x $80, 100 / Acre = $14, 338 14, 338 represents the relative Land Damage benefit experienced by the example parcel presented. This benefit plus the structure and content damage benefit are used to determine the total relative benefit of the parcel as compared to other parcels in the benefit area.

Total Proportional Flood Damage Reduction Benefit
The total relative flood damage reduction benefit for each parcel in the benefit area is the sum of the structure damage, content damage, and the land damage associated with that parcel. Given the single story single- family residential property examples used in the preceding discussions, the resulting total relative flood damage reduction benefit is calculated as follows:

Flood Damage Reduction Benefit = Structure Damage + Content Damage + Land Damage Example:

Single Story Single -Family Residence
Parcel Acreage: 0. 179 acres
Building Square Feet: 2, 000
Flood Depth 5 Feet
Structure Damage = 2, 000 sf x $ 60/ sf x 55. 90% = $ 67, 080 Content Damage = 2, 000 sf x $ 30/ sf x 18. 30% = $ 10, 980 Land Damage = 0. 179 Acres x $ 80, 100 / Acre = $ 14, 338 Flood Damage Reduction Benefit = $ 67, 080 + $10, 980 + $14, 338 = $92, 398 The analysis described above was performed for every parcel in the benefit area that was determined to receive special benefit. The sum of total Flood Damage Reduction Benefit ( FDRB) for all assessed parcels is calculated to be 3, 551, 333, 222 FDRB at the time this Report was prepared.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 31
Yy WILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Table 8 that follows, provides a summary breakdown of the FDRBs for both special and general benefits for fiscal year 2024/025.

TABLE 8: FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION BENEFITS BY LAND USE (5) Land Use
Structure Damage
Reduction Benefit
Content Damage
Reduction Benefit
Land Damage
Reduction Benefit
Total Damage
Reduction Benefit
Agriculture
Agriculture - Single Family
Sub -Total Agriculture
Commercial - Developed
Commercial - Vacant
Sub -Total Commercial
Industrial - Developed
Industrial - Vacant
Sub -Total Industrial
Public - Developed
Public - Vacant
Sub -Total Public
Residential - Mobile Home
Residential - Multi Family
Residential - Single Family
Residential - Vacant
Sub -Total Residential
Planned Commercial Development
Planned Industrial Development
Planned Residential Development
Sub -Total Planned Development
Total Special Benefit
General Benefit
Grand Total
2, 378, 820
2, 378, 820
61, 166, 719
61, 166, 719
179, 629, 179
102, 741
179, 731, 920
30, 116, 470
30, 116, 470
1, 082, 961
6, 382,50
1, 064, 404, 020
797, 492
1, 072, 666, 823
94, 298, 100
5, 094
12, 670, 915
106, 974, 109
1, 453, 034, 860
1, 453, 034, 860
3,45, 621
3,45, 621
151, 360, 257
151, 360, 257
412, 616, 130
412, 616, 130
86, 383, 799
86, 383, 799
698, 323
1, 009, 567
531, 446, 917
124, 868
533, 279, 675
216, 578, 297
18, 812
1, 956, 563
218, 553, 672
1, 405, 539, 154
1, 405, 539, 154
13, 324, 475
7, 549, 927
20, 874, 402
64, 221, 493
41, 655, 760
105, 877, 252
38, 448, 984
9,28, 898
48, 377, 882
36, 965, 088
17, 511, 996
54, 477, 085
5, 773, 047
7, 927, 830
324,81, 130
100, 353, 360
438,35, 368
9, 428, 576
5, 836, 723
9, 451, 920
24, 717, 219
692, 759, 209
21, 461, 107
714, 220, 316
13, 324, 475
13, 274, 367
26, 598, 843
276, 748, 468
41, 655, 760
318, 404, 228
630,94, 294
10, 031, 639
640, 725, 933
153, 465, 358
17, 511, 996
170, 977, 354
7, 554, 331
15, 319, 748
1, 920, 232, 067
101, 275, 721
2, 044, 381, 866
320,04, 973
5, 860, 628
24, 079, 398
350, 244, 999
3, 551, 333, 222
21, 461, 107
3, 572, 794, 330
The Flood Damage Reduction Benefit data in the Table above is based on parcel information and characteristics at the time this Report was prepared and applicable to fiscal year 2024/025.

Assessment Rate and Revenue
Proposition 218 requires assessments levied to be proportional to the benefits conferred by the improvements, facilities, and/ or services provided. To ensure that the spread of assessments is proportional based upon the benefits calculated above, the annual special benefit costs of the improvements, facilities, and/ or services are divided by the total benefits calculated for all benefiting parcels. The estimated Project Service revenue required annually is estimated to be 2, 625, 000 (in fiscal year 2024/025 dollars), of which approximately $ 15, 766 is calculated to be General Benefit costs with approximately $ 2, 609, 234 being identified as special benefit costs.

The proportional assessment rate to generate the estimated $ 2, 625, 000 in Total Benefit Expenses ( Special and General Benefits) is approximately $ 0.0073472 per Flood Damage Reduction Benefit ($ 2, 625, 000 / 3, 572, 794, 330 FDRB = $ 0.0073472 per FDRB).

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 32
Wwi LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Annual Inflationary Adjustment ( Assessment Range Formula) As part of the District formation and establishment of annual assessments to fund the Project Services, the proposed assessments described in this Report and to be submitted to the property owners of record in the Ballot Proceeding shall include an annual inflationary adjustment referred to as an Assessment Range Formula. To ensure that SJAFCA can provide the needed Project Services over time, it is important to allow for an increase of the assessment over time to address the rising costs of labor, supplies, and materials that are inevitably associated with providing such improvements and activities, thereby reducing the need for additional noticing and balloting procedures simply because of inflationary factors. The Assessment Range Formula for this District is defined by the following:

Commencing in the second fiscal year ( Fiscal Year 2025/026) and each fiscal year thereafter through the 30 -year term of the assessments ( Fiscal Year 2054/ 2055), pursuant to Government Code § 53739( b), the initial authorized Maximum Assessment Rate per FDRB presented in this Report for Fiscal Year 2025/026 and establishing the ballot assessments for the District, shall be adjusted annually based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index February to February CPI -W for San Francisco -Oakland -Hayward all Items, with Base Period 1982- 84 = 100, published by the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, subject to a minimum of zero percent and a maximum of 4% in any given year.

Each fiscal year the Agency shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI -W, using the difference over a 12 -month period between February to February This percentage difference shall then establish the range of increase to the maximum assessment rate allowed based on CPI. If the percentage change in the CPI is greater than four percent ( 4.0%), the maximum assessment rate shall be increased by four percent ( 4.0%). If the percentage change in the CPI is less than four percent ( 4.0%), the maximum assessment rate shall be increased by the percentage change in the CPI. However, if the percentage change in the CPI is negative ( less than 0%) then the maximum assessment rate shall not be increased or decreased from the prior fiscal year.

Therefore, the minimum annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate per FDRB is zero percent ( 0%) and the maximum annual adjustment is four percent ( 4%).

Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, SJAFCA shall use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the SJAFCA Board for determining fluctuations in inflation.

Appeals Process
Any property owner who believes his or her property should be reclassified and the assessment adjusted may file a written appeal with the SJAFCA Executive Director. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then -current fiscal year and future years.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 33

WWI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
All appeals must include a statement of reasons why the property should be reclassified and may include supporting evidence. On the filing of any such appeal, the Executive Director will direct staff to promptly review the appeal and any information provided by the property owner and may investigate and assemble additional evidence necessary to evaluate the appeal. If the Executive Director finds that the assessment should be modified, the appropriate changes will be made to the assessment roll for the following fiscal year. Any such changes approved after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection will not result in a refund of the current or any prior year' s assessments paid before the appeal was filed unless so directed by the Executive Director.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 34
try WI LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Part IV — Assessment Roll
Due to the number of parcels within the proposed Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed for special benefit within this District along with the balloted assessment amounts) has been filed with the Clerk of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency, in an electronic format and is by reference made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Office during normal office hours.

The Assessment Roll reflects all parcels identified within the District and the corresponding proportional special benefit assessment amount for fiscal year 2024/025, which is also the amount being balloted for each parcel as part of the Ballot Proceeding. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor' sRoll and the County Assessor' sParcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots and parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County Assessor' sOffice securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024/025.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 35

YY WILLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Part V — Assessment Diagram
The territory within the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District is narrowly defined to include those lots and parcels of land within the Mossdale Tract Area of San Joaquin County that have been identified as parcels receiving a reduction or elimination of potential uncontrolled riverine flooding from the San Joaquin River levees and related flood control infrastructure improvements that are to be constructed, operated, and maintained as part of the proposed Project Services.

The boundary of the District and the parcels therein are based on hydrologic and hydraulic mapping ( flood levels), incorporating each of the parcels within the Mossdale Tract Area that have been identified as parcels receiving a reduction or elimination of potential flood damages from inundation or force by floodwaters as a result of the construction and operation of flood risk reduction components in and adjacent to the Mossdale Tract Area which include fix in place and potential levee setback improvements as well as a dryland levee extension in Manteca.

The parcels within the District as identified on the Assessment Roll as referenced in Part IV of this Report and depicted in the Boundary and Flood Zone Diagram ( Figure 5 on the following page) constitute the Assessment Diagram Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District. The Boundary and Flood Zone Diagram also shows the general location of the improvements associated with the Project Services for which properties identified on the Assessment Roll referenced in Part IV of this Report are being balloted for a new special benefit assessment to support a portion of Project Service costs. The parcels therein shall consist of and be dictated by the lines and dimensions as those lots, parcels and subdivisions of land listed on the Assessment Roll and shown on the San Joaquin County Assessor' sparcel maps for fiscal year 2024/025 and shall incorporate all subsequent parcel splits and merges and by reference the San Joaquin County Assessor' sparcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report.

Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 36

W I LLDAN
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Preliminary Engineer' sReport, Fiscal Year 2024/025
Figure 5: Boundary and Zone Diagram ( Assessment Diagram) Legend

EXISTING LEVEE
Zone 2
Proposed Boundaries

FLOOD DEPTH
RANGES
1 - Less than 1 Ft
2-1. 01to2Ft
201to4Ft
4-01 to 6 Ft
5- 601 to 8 Ft
6- 801 to 10 Ft
7- 1001 to 12 Ft
8- 1201 to 14 Ft
9- Over 14Ft
to 3' 6x20024
W4V1 LLDAN iY '' LIiffjyl mss, 9
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District Page 37

PAGE LEFT

INTENTIONALLY
BLANK

← All documents from this meeting