ITEM 4. 6
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
OCTOBER 14, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM:
RECOMMENDATION:
VALIDATION OF THE 2023 FINDING OF
ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE MOSSDALE
TRACT AREA
Adopt Resolution Validating the 2023 Urban
Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) Finding of
Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area,
Acting as the Land Use Agency
SUMMARY:
Senate Bill 5 ( SB5) and related companion bills created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the California Central Valley. Prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for non- residential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions ( building permits) for new residential buildings, land use agencies are required to make findings related to the provision of 200 -Year or Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP).
On June 20, 2016, June 5, 2017, July 9, 2018, July 8, 2019, July 13, 2020, July 12, 2021, and February 13, 2023, City Council approved an Adequate Progressing Finding Report ( APR) toward provision of 200 -Year ULOP in Reclamation District 17 Basin hereinafter referred to as the " Mossdale Tract Area").
The 2023 APR is included as Attachment " B" for a 200 -Year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Mossdale Tract Area by the Year 2040. Staff requests that the City Council adopt a Resolution, included as Attachment " A", validating the 2023 ULOP Finding of Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area that will allow the City of Lathrop to continue to issue discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits for new residential homes for a limited period subject to ongoing validation of that finding.
BACKGROUND:
The California Department of Water Resources ( DWR) developed certain guidance and ULOP criteria in response to requirements outlined in the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, enacted by SB5 in 2007 and amended by subsequent legislation ( 2007 California Flood Legislation). DWR developed the ULOP criteria to assist affected cities and counties within the Sacramento -San Joaquin Valley, in making the findings related to an ULOP before approving certain land use entitlements in accordance with the 2007 California Flood Legislation.
The existing Mossdale Tract Area levees currently do not meet the updated DWR Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) standards adopted by DWR in May 2012, and the existing levees are not currently certified to provide 200 -year protection.
Accordingly, the land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area, in coordination with RD 17, have been jointly pursuing efforts to achieve ULOP by 2025. AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
OCTOBER 14, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2023 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
2028. SB 586, signed into law on April 30, 2024, extended the ULOP deadline from 2028 to 2040. According to the Project implementation schedule, ULOP will be completed by 2040.
In June 2016, Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc. (LWA) prepared the " RD 17 Area:
Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection" (APR). The APR served as a strategic plan describing and outlining the steps that the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) and the land use agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area are taking to generate the local funding necessary to advance and ultimately implement 200 -year levee improvements in accordance with the requirements of 2007 Senate Bill 5 ( SB5).
On June 2017, July 2018, July 2019, July 2020, July 2021, and February 2023, City Council approved an APR toward provision of the 200 -Year ULOP in the Mossdale Tract Area as one of the ongoing requirements is to annually report to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB) on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system. This 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update 2023 APR) included as Attachment " B", in combination with other documentation submitted by San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) as the LFMA, is intended to continue to support the requirements of Government Code Section 65007 a)( 5) that " the local flood management agency shall annually report to the CVFPB on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system." As noted above, it is also intended that this report may be referenced by all of the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area ( specifically the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton, as well as San Joaquin County) in making new or validating findings related to approval of development projects that rely on the Adequate Progress Findings where such a finding is applicable.
The 2023 APR described several aspects including:
The requirements set forth by SB5 and ULOP;
The requirements of Land Use Agencies in making findings related to Adequate Progress toward ULOP, and, more specifically;
The approach the LFMA in the Mossdale Tract Area is taking with respect to compliance with the guidance provided by the California Department of Water Resource in support of the Land Use Agencies' maintenance of findings of Adequate Progress.
In addition, the 2007 California Flood Control Legislation required the LFMA to:
Report annually to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on the status of the progress toward completion of the flood protection system, and Validate that the adequate progress finding is still effective.
The 2023 APR was prepared to satisfy the above requirements so that the City of Lathrop, as a Land Use Agency, may rely on the prior findings of Adequate Progress.
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
OCTOBER 14, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2023 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
Based as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' sadopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. SJAFCA' sefforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. (KSN) detailing the additional costs of complying with the adopted climate adaptation policy as well as the materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2022 update to the 2016 Engineer' sReport and associated IPE review/ Engineer' sresponse.
A comprehensive update of SJAFCA' s Project was prepared in 2021 to consolidate and present a single budget for to address ULDC deficiencies and address Climate Adaptation. The updated cost estimate in present day 2021 dollars, is approximately 230 million.
Previously, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, as well as Reclamation District 17, comprised the LFMA, and these agencies have been reporting the status of ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area to the CVFPB. With the modification of SJAFCA' smembership in 2018, SJAFCA has taken over the role of LFMA for the Mossdale Tract Area, and this report is now being submitted to support all land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area.
On April 18, 2024, the SJAFCA Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form an assessment district to provide the local cost share for the $ 473M levee improvement project to provide an ULOP to the Mossdale Tract Area. The SJAFCA Board officially adopted the assessment in July 2024 after it was approved by property owners.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Approval by SJAFCA of the 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for a 200 -Year ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area, and submission by SJAFCA of this report to the CVFPB included as Attachment " C", allows the City of Lathrop, as a Land Use Agency, to rely on the prior findings of Adequate Progress. This will then allow the City of Lathrop to continue to issue, within the Mossdale Tract Area, discretionary permits to commercial and industrial uses, and ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes while the City continues to make progress toward establishing ULOP 200 -year flood protection by the year 2040.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Initially, all technical reports have been funded by the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca and our development community. Recently, these funds have been supplemented by advanced funds from Stockton, the County of San Joaquin, and the State of California via an Urban Flood Risk Reduction grant. The future cost will be provided by outside funding sources identified in the 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
OCTOBER 14, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2023 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lathrop, Acting as the Land Use Agency, Validating the 2023 Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) Finding of Adequate Progress in the Mossdale Tract Area
B. 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Protection Final Report, dated September 3, 2024
C. SJAFCA Letter dated, September 26, 2024 to CVFPB transmitting the 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Protection CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 5
OCTOBER 14, 2024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
VALIDATION OF THE 2023 FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
APPROVALS:
Brad lfylor
City Engineer
Cari Jam
Finance Di ec or
q/ z-7/
Date
9, 60/ A): 2„4: 7z
Date
30 • zozy
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
zSalvador Navarrete Date
wzW
City Attorney
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
l0. 9•?- 6
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 24-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP VALIDATING THE 2023 URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD PROTECTION ( ULOP)
FINDING OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS IN THE MOSSDALE TRACT AREA, ACTING
AS THE LAND USE AGENCY
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 5 ( SB5), and related companion bills, created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the California Central Valley; and
WHEREAS, prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for non- residential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions building permits) for new residential buildings, land use agencies are required to make findings related to the provision of 200 -year Urban Level of Flood Protection ULOP); and
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2018, San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency SJAFCA) has taken over the role of Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) for the Reclamation District 17 Basin ( hereinafter referred to as the " Mossdale Tract Area") and this report is now being submitted to support all land use agencies within the Mossdale Tract Area; and
WHEREAS, AB 838, signed into law on September 28, 2020, extended the ULOP deadline from 2025 to 2028. SB 586, signed into law on April 30, 2024, extended the ULOP deadline from 2028 to 2040. According to the Project implementation schedule, ULOP will be completed by 2040; and WHEREAS, on June 2017, July 2018, July 2019, July 2020, July 2021, and February 2023, City Council approved an Adequate Progressing Finding Report (APR) toward provision of 200 -year ULOP in the Mossdale Tract Area; and WHEREAS, based as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' sadopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. SJAFCA' s efforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of a December 12, 2019 technical memorandum by Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. (KSN) detailing the additional costs of complying with the adopted climate adaptation policy as well as the materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2021 update to the 2016 Engineer' sReport and associated IPE review/ Engineer' sresponse; and
WHEREAS, a comprehensive update of Project was prepared in 2021 to consolidate and present a single budget for to address ULDC deficiencies and address Climate Adaptation. The updated cost estimate in present day 2021 dollars is approximately $ 230 million; and
WHEREAS, based on SJAFCA' sapproval of the Mossdale Tract Program: 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update for Urban Level of Flood Protection dated September 3, 2024, included as Attachment B to the City Manager' s Report, and its transmittal to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, included as Attachment C to the City Manager' s Report, staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution validating prior findings of Adequate Progress made by the City on June 20, 2016; and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2024, the SJAFCA Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form an assessment district to provide the local cost share for the $ 473M levee improvement project to provide an ULOP to the Mossdale Tract Area. The SJAFCA Board officially adopted the assessment in July 2024 after it was approved by property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop, acting as the land use agency, hereby validates and reaffirms the June 20, 2016 Finding of Adequate Progress toward providing a 200 -Year Urban Level of Flood Protection in the Mossdale Tract Area by the year 2040, based upon the 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update included as Attachment B to the October 14, 2024 City Manager' sReport that accompanied this resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the hereby referenced and incorporated substantial evidence in the record, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby validates and affirms that the Adequate Progress Finding adopted, pursuant to SB5 and its companion legislation, shall serve as the Adequate Progress Finding for the City of Lathrop' s approval of any and all discretionary permits and approvals issued pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law, the California Subdivision Map Act, and Development Agreement Law to any commercial and industrial uses, and any and all ministerial permits ( building permits) for new residential homes for a period of 10 years' subject to ongoing validation of that finding, as applied to urban development in the Mossdale Tract Area which urban development is approved in accordance with local and State laws; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the hereby referenced and incorporated substantial evidence in the record, hereby and above referenced reports and all documents comprising the record of proceedings, affected land use decisions for development in Mossdale Tract Area are expected to have 200 -year flood protection by 2040.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 14th day of October 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney LWA
LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc.
2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 240
Sacramento, CA 95833
Mossda
ATTACHMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE
MANAGEMENT
RESOLVED
e Tract Proc ram:
2023 Annual
Adequate Progress
Report Update
FOR UBB N LE- /EL OF PROTECTION
Prepared for: The San Joaquin Area F
Septernoer 3, 2024
cod Contra Agency ( SJA CAI
www. Iarsenwurzel. com
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview & Context 1
Land Use and LFMA Requirements for Maintaining Findings of Adequate Progress toward ULOP 2 Mossdale Tract Area Approach to ULOP 2
Adequate Progress toward ULOP 6
Critical Features of the Flood Protection System are Under Construction and Each Critical Feature is Progressing 6
RD 17 Levee Seepage Repair Project 6
SJAFCA ULOP Project 7
Summary of Scope, Schedule & Cost 7
Schedule 8
Total Program Costs 9
Applicable Geographic Area Reliant on Adequate Progress Report 11 Project Funding and Financing Approach 13
Governance Approach to Funding & Implementation 14
Project Funding and Financing Plan 15
Remaining Project Costs 15
LSRP Project 15
Sources & Uses 15
Detailed Cash Flow Analysis and Schedule of Expenses and Revenues 16 Government Code § 65007( a) ( 2) (A) Compliance 16
Evaluation of Identified Revenues 25
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District 26
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District 26
Status and Schedule for Local Funding & Financing Implementation 29
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
i
1801014 Mossdate APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Program Cost Summary 10
Table 2: RD 17 LSRP Remaining Capital Cost Estimate & Cost Share 18 Table 3: ULDC Project Engineer' sOpinion of Probable Cost 19 Table 4: ULOP Adequate Progress Sources & Uses Statement (through 2026) 20 Table 5: ULOP Levee Program Cash Flow and Financing Analysis 21 Table 6: Government Code 65007 ( a) Analysis 23
Table 7: Expenditure Schedule for SJAFCA' s ULOP Project 24
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: 200 -Year Floodplain Depths for Areas Protected by Levees 12 Figure 2: Assessment Revenue & EIFD Tax Increment Financing Approach 28
APPENDICES
Appendix A: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 19- 06: Resolution to Adopt Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA in Light of Climate Change February 24, 2023, Technical Memorandum prepared by Kjeldsen Sinnock Neudeck, Inc. re:
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project: 2023 Cost Estimate Update
Appendix B: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 22- 07: Resolution Directing Staff to Work with the Member Land Use Agencies to Finalize the Mossdale Tract Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee Update and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute an Amended Collection Agreement (excluding the final Nexus Study Update) 1 Amended Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Protection Development Impact Fee ( Partial Execution) 1 A full copy of the referenced Final Nexus Study can be found here:
https:// stockton. granicus. com/ MetaViewer. php? view id= 70& clip id= 7899& meta id= 698228
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
ii 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Development Impact Fee Program Supporting Tables
Appendix C: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Resolution No. 24-2: Resolution of the Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Approving Final Engineer' s Report, Forming the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District and Ordering the Levy of Assessment beginning in Fiscal Year 2024-5
Appendix D: RD 17 LSRP Project Supporting Tables
Appendix E: Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District — Infrastructure Financing Plan Final Report dated June 2, 20222
Memorandum of Understanding between the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency and the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District Public Financing Authority dated June 15, 2023
Supporting Financing Plan Tables
2 A full copy of the referenced IFP Final Report can be found here:
https:// www. siafca. org/ home/ showpublisheddocument/ 1275/ 637902252871700000
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
APR Adequate Progress Repot
2016 APR RD 17: Area Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection ( June 2016) Area Mossdale Tract Area
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
Climate Adaptation Policy SJAFCA adopted Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SAJFCA in Light of Climate Change CVFPB Central Valley Flood Protection Board
DIF Development Impact Fee
DWR California Department of Water Resource
EIFD Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
EIP Early Implementation Program
Engineer' s Report PBI' s March 22, 2016, ULDC Evaluation of the RD 17 Levee Project Levee Improvements to meet ULDC 200 -year requirements IPE Independent Panel of Experts
JEPA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
JPA Joint Powers Authority
KSN Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck Inc.
Land Use Agencies San Joaquin County and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton LFMA Local Flood Management Agency (previously RD 17,
Lathrop, and Manteca, now SJAFCA)
LSRP Levee Seepage Repair Project
LWA Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc.
Mossdale Tract Area The area serviced by Reclamation District No. 17 O&M Operations and maintenance
OAD Special Benefit Overlay Assessment District
PBI Peterson Brustad, Inc.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
iv 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
RD 17 Reclamation District 17
RFP Request for Proposal
SBS Senate Bill 5 ( 2007)
SJAFCA San Joaquin Flood Control Agency
SJCFCWCD San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District IFP / the Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan
UFRR Urban Flood Risk Reduction
ULDC Urban Levee Design Criteria
ULOP Urban Level of Flood Protection
USACE U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
v
1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Overview & Context
Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc. (LWA) has been engaged by the San Joaquin Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA), the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) for the Mossdale Tract Area ( the Area), to prepare the Annual Adequate Progress Report Update ( Annual APR Update) toward the achievement of an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP) within the Mossdale Tract Area (Area) for calendar year 2023. In 2016 and 2017, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, as well as Reclamation District 17 ( RD 17) comprised the LFMA and these agencies reported the status of Adequate Progress for the Area to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB).
In January 2018, SJAFCA took over the role of LFMA for the Area and assumed responsibility for Annual Reporting pursuant to Government Code § 65007 ( a)( 5). This Annual APR Update is being submitted by SJAFCA to support all land use agencies within the Area. This is the eighth Annual Report on Adequate Progress for the Area; the sixth prepared by SJAFCA.
As noted in the 2018 Annual APR Update, prior to January 2018, SJAFCA' s membership consisted of the City of Stockton, San Joaquin County, and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SJCFCWCD). Effective January 1, 2018, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement ( JEPA) establishing SJAFCA was amended to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca. This action was taken by all members of the new SJAFCA organization as part of the plan ( described further within this report') to achieve ULOP. Herein, San Joaquin County and the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton are jointly referred to as the Land Use Agencies.
In June 2016, LWA prepared the " RD 17 Area: Adequate Progress Report for Urban Level of Protection" 2016 APR). The 2016 APR served as a strategic plan describing and outlining the steps that the LFMA and the Land Use Agencies in the RD 17 basin ( hereinafter referred to as the Mossdale Tract Area) are taking to generate the local funding necessary to advance and ultimately implement 200 -year levee improvements in accordance with the requirements of Senate Bill 5 ( 2007) (SB5). The 2016 APR described several aspects including:
The requirements set forth by SB5 and ULOP;
The requirements of the Land Use Agencies in making findings related to Adequate Progress toward ULOP, and, more specifically;
The approach the LFMAs in the Mossdale Tract Area were taking with respect to compliance with the guidance provided by the California Department of Water Resource ( DWR) in support of the Land Use Agencies' maintenance of findings of Adequate Progress. 3 Reference the Governance Approach to Funding & Implementation section ( page 12) of this report.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
1 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Land Use and LFMA Requirements for Maintaining Findings of Adequate Progress toward ULOP
Adequate Progress has been defined by the 2007 California Flood Legislation ( see Government Code 65007( a)) as:
The development of the scope, schedule, and cost to complete flood protection facilities; Documentation that revenues have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities;
Evidence that critical features of the flood protection facilities are under construction and progressing; The city or county has not been responsible for a significant delay in the completion of the system; and
The LFMA has provided DWR and the CVFPB information to determine substantial completion of the required flood protection.
Regarding the last bullet, the LFMA must annually document:
That the total project scope, schedule, and cost of the completed flood protection system have been developed to meet the appropriate standard of protection; That 90% of the required revenue scheduled to be received by that year have been appropriated and are being expended;
Critical features of the flood protection system are under construction and each critical feature is progressing as indicated by the actual expenditures of the construction budget; and, The city or county has not been responsible for a significant delay in the completion of the system.
In addition, the 2007 California Flood Control Legislation requires the LFMA to report annually to the CVFPB on the status of progress toward completion of the flood protection system.
This 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update is intended to satisfy the annual reporting requirements for 2023 by the LFMA for reference by the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area in their ULOP findings.
Mossdale Tract Area Approach to ULOP
The 2016 APR was prepared by the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca and RD 17 to provide information for the Cities and County located within the Mossdale Tract Area, for their reference in support of their respective ULOP findings for land use decisions within the Mossdale Tract Area. The following describes the evidentiary conclusions from the 2016 APR, based on DWR' s ULOP criteria ( collectively the ULOP EVD- 34):
A report prepared by the LFMA demonstrating Adequate Progress as defined in California Government Code Section 65007( a).
o The 2016 APR, in combination with other documentation prepared by the Land Use Agencies demonstrated adequate progress.
Reference page 2- 10 within the ULOP Criteria, November 2013.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc.
2 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
A report prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer registered in California to document the data and analyses for demonstrating the property, development project, or subdivision will have ULOP at the time when the flood protection system is completed.
o The LFMA requested that a team of Professional Engineers led by Peterson Brustad, Inc. (P81) in coordination with their subconsultants, Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck Inc. (KSN) and ENGEO prepare the required report. Their report, dated March 22, 2016, compiled under a Cover Memorandum titled " Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) Evaluation of the RD17 Levee" met the requirement at that time.
A report by an Independent Panel of Experts ( IPE) on the review of the report prepared by the Professional Civil Engineer.
o An 1PE consisting of Robert Pyke, Edwin Hultgren, and Thomas Plummer was engaged to review the Engineer' s Report. The panel' sreport dated May 24, 2016, titled " Independent Review of Urban Levee Design Criteria Evaluation, March 2016" fulfilled this requirement.
A response by the Professional Civil Engineer to the comments from the IPE. o P81, author of the documents reviewed by the IPE, responded in a letter addressed to Mr. Glenn Gebhardt with the City of Lathrop and Mr. Kevin Jorgensen with the City of Manteca, dated June 3, 2016. Mr. Dave Peterson, P. E. of P81 prepared the response. This letter fulfilled this requirement.
An annual report prepared by the LFMA, submitted to the CVFPB documenting the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system.
o The 2016 APR, in combination with other documentation prepared by the acting LFMA, supported the evidentiary requirements of Adequate Progress. The 2016 APR addressed how the flood protection system that will provide ULOP will be funded and financed. The 2016 APR described the proposed funding mechanisms, the approach and schedule for their implementation, and the projected revenues identified to support implementation of the flood protection system.
The CVFPB, on October 25, 2016, acknowledged receipt of the evidentiary documentation including the 2016 APR and indicated that the " submittal sufficiently complies with the statutory requirements of California Government Code Section 65007( a)". The CVFPB indicated that their compliance letter was valid through September 30, 2017 and that future year' s evaluations would be based upon review of annually submitted documents.
On August 10, 2017, the City of Lathrop, acting as the LFMA and on behalf of the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca, transmitted the first Annual APR Update, the 2017 Adequate Progress Report Update, dated June 13, 2017. In response to the submission of that report, CVFPB staff requested that the City of Lathrop prepare an Adequate Progress Submittal Form which was completed and submitted to CVFPB staff on Thursday November 2, 2017.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
3 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Subsequent Annual reports have been submitted by SJAFCA, acting as the LFMA and on behalf of the Mossdale Tract Area, to the CVFPB as follows:
On June 28, 2018, SJAFCA transmitted the 2018 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
On June 28, 2019, SJAFCA transmitted the 2019 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
On June 30, 2020, SJAFCA transmitted the 2020 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
On June 29, 2021, SJAFCA transmitted the 2021 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
On January 31, 2023, SJAFCA transmitted the 2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update.
To address the uncertain nature of climate change and the resulting impacts to hydraulics and hydrology, in February 2019 SJAFCA adopted a Policy on Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SAJFCA in Light of Climate Change ( Climate Adaptation Policy, SJAFCA Resolution No. 19- 06, included as Appendix A).
This policy identifies seven specific elements that are to be incorporated into both the design and implementation of the Mossdale Tract 200 -year improvements to address climate change uncertainties.
Further, SJAFCA engaged a task order with PBI to update the scope and cost of the 200 -year improvements to address the adopted Climate Adaptation Policy. This effort resulted in the preparation of a detailed cost estimate prepared by Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. (KSN) addressing the costs of complying with policy.
The 2020 Annual Report Update and subsequent reports have reflected the costs of compliance with the adopted Climate Adaptation Policy as part of the financing plans presented within them. Further, an evaluation and analysis of the proposed Climate Adaptation Policy improvements determining that the improvements meet the appropriate standard of protection has been completed consistent with the evidentiary requirements of DWR' s ULOP criteria. The 2021 Annual Report Update and subsequent reports include reference to the additional evidentiary materials. Those materials include:
A report prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer registered in California to document the data and analyses for demonstrating the property, development project, or subdivision will have ULOP at the time when the flood protection system is completed.
o A team of Professional Engineers led by Peterson Brustad, Inc. (P81) in coordination with their subconsultants, Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck Inc. ( KSN) and ENGEO prepare a report dated
June 18, 2021, compiled under a Cover Memorandum titled " 2021 Climate Change Update to the Mossdale Engineer' sReport." The materials included within the report were presented to the IPE in April 2021 for their review and comment.
A report by an Independent Panel of Experts ( IPE) on the review of the report prepared by the Professional Civil Engineer.
o An IPE consisting of Robert Pyke, Robert Lokteff, and Thomas Plummer was engaged to review the 2021 Climate Change Update to the Mossdale Engineer' s Report. In response, the IPE prepared a
report dated June 1, 2021, titled " Independent Panel of Experts for RD 17200 -Year Level of Protection Project Climate Change Update."
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
4 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
A response by the Professional Civil Engineer to the comments from the IPE. o P81, author of the documents reviewed by the IPE, responded in a letter addressed to Mr. Chris Elias, dated June 18, 2021. Mr. Michael Rossiter, P. E. of P81 prepared the response. This letter fulfilled the response requirement.
An annual report prepared by the LFMA, submitted to the CVFPB documenting the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system.
o This 2023 APR, in combination with the documentation prepared by the LFMA, supports the evidentiary requirements of Adequate Progress. This 2023 APR addresses how the flood protection system, as described within the 2016 and 2021 Climate Change Update Engineer' s reports, will provide ULOP will be funded and financed. This 2023 APR describes the proposed funding mechanisms, the approach and schedule for their implementation, and the projected revenues identified to support implementation of the flood protection system. Further, this 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update is intended to continue to address the requirements of Government Code Section 65007 (a)( 5). " The local flood management agency shall annually report to the CVFPB on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system."
Finally, it is intended that this report, in combination with any other required documentation pursuant to SB5 and DWR' s associated ULOP Guidance, may be referenced by the Land Use Agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area ( specifically the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, and Stockton, as well as San Joaquin County) in making new or validating findings related to approval of development projects that rely on the Adequate Progress Findings where such a finding is applicable.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
5 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Adequate Progress toward ULOP
The existing RD 17 levees protecting the Mossdale Tract Area do not meet the updated DWR ULDC standards adopted in May 2012, and the existing levees are not currently certified to provide 200 -year protection.
Accordingly, SJAFCA is pursuing efforts to achieve ULOP by the required deadline. The required deadline for achieving ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area, as of the date of this report, is 2040. 5 The LFMA' s plan for flood protection through the year 2040 consists of two components: (1) RD 17' s ongoing Phase 3 Levee Seepage Repair Project ( LSRP) and ( 2) SJAFCA Levee Improvements to achieve ULDC 200 -year requirements ( the Project or SJAFCA ULOP Project).
The SJAFCA ULOP Project, as described previously in the 2016 APR, consists of a Fix -In -Place Levee Improvement Project and an extension of the existing dryland levee in Manteca. A review of the ( i) Project scope, (ii) Project schedule, and ( iii) the cost of the completed flood protection system, all as proposed in 2016, demonstrates that they were developed to meet the appropriate standard of protection based on information known at that time. As noted above, as part of the implementation of SJAFCA' s adopted Climate Adaptation Policy and efforts to advance a Feasibility Study with DWR under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction UFRR) program, SJAFCA identified and analyzed the requisite improvements needed to meet the appropriate standard of protection when considering the uncertain impacts of climate change. SJAFCA' sefforts to address climate change resulted in the preparation of materials to support all of the requisite evidentiary requirements of ULOP including the 2021 Update to the 2016 Engineer' s Report and associated IPE review/ Engineer' sresponse.
Critical Features of the Flood Protection System are Under Construction and Each Critical Feature is Progressing
RD 17 Levee Seepage Repair Project
RD 17, with funding from the issuances of multiple series of bonds secured by assessment revenues and a funding agreement with DWR, has constructed nearly all of the Phase 3 LSRP improvements. The remaining component of the Phase 3 LSRP improvements include:
1. A 400' long SB/CB jet -grout cutoff wall under the River Islands Parkway bridge ( Element VI -a.1); and,
Based on information obtained from RD 17 and estimates made by LWA given information provided, a cumulative total of approximately $ 80. 1 million of LSRP improvements ( an estimated additional $ 12. 386 million since December 2022) have been completed. The RD 17 Levee Area Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority ( JPA) set up by agencies in the Mossdale Tract Area, issued $ 20. 85 million of bonds in 2017 to both refinance a prior financing from 2009 and to generate additional net new proceeds for flood control SB 586, signed into law on April 30, 2024, extended the ULOP deadline for the Mossdale Tract to 2040.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
6 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
improvements of $6. 531 million. These funds, along with grant funding from DWR and annual assessment revenues from RD 17, have been utilized to continue to advance the LSRP toward completion.
Any remaining components not completed by RD 17 will be completed as part of SJAFCA' s ULOP Project to ensure the levee system meets the requirements of ULOP.
SJAFCA ULOP Project
In June 2016, the City of Lathrop secured 50% funding for $ 10 million of work ( total of $ 5. 0 million of grant funding) from DWR under the UFRR Program and executed a funding agreement with DWR to fund a feasibility
analysis of a focused array of alternatives which address State estimates of climate change through 2040. In January of 2019, the grant funding agreement transitioned to SJAFCA. The Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Study ( UFRR Study) was completed in September 2021. The UFRR Study cost approximately
1. 83 million. The early engineering evaluations and ULDC deficiency analyses cost approximately $ 2. 83 million. DWR provided cost sharing for both the early work and the UFRR Study, approximately $ 2. 3 million.
The remaining funds from DWR, approximately, $ 2. 0 million have been used to advance environmental review California Environmental Quality Act [ CEQA] Analysis) and preliminary design of the initial phase of the preferred alternative.
In September 2022, SJAFCA executed a Feasibility Study Cost Share Agreement ( FCSA) with the USACE to evaluate the Federal Interest in an array of alternatives to provide enhanced flood protection to the Lathrop and Manteca Area. This study will result in the preparation of the Lower San Joaquin River Lathrop and Manteca Feasibility Study, CA. While Federal interest in the Mossdale Program is being evaluated, SJAFCA has continued to advance the design and permitting of certain common features of the UFRR feasibility study preferred alternatives that overlap with the features of the ULOP Project.
By May of 2023, SJAFCA had fully expended the approximately $ 2. 0 million of remaining UFRR funding available for CEQA Analysis and preliminary design effort. SJAFCA is now advancing preliminary design and CEQA independently utilizing local funds. In addition to the $ 5. 0 Million of State funding made available from the State to prepare the UFRR Feasibility Study and advance Preliminary Design and CEQA, the State has committed an additional $ 75 million of funding which will be provided to SJAFCA through an amendment to the UFRR funding agreement. This funding will advance implementation of improvements ahead of Federal authorization of the Project. This funding, coupled with local funding from SJAFCA, will ultimately finalize the design of the improvements and advance construction of the Dryland Levee improvements.
Summary of Scope, Schedule & Cost
The 2016 Engineer' sReport and 2021 Update identify two projects. These projects are listed below and, when fully implemented, will meet the objective of 200 -year ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area. These projects include:
1. RD 17 LSRP is being implemented in three phases:
a. Phase 1 ( Completed 2008- 09)
b. Phase 2 ( Completed 2009- 11)
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
7 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
c. Phase 3 ( Construction Commenced 2016 - Completion scheduled end of 2024)
2. SJAFCA ULOP Project6 is being pursued as Phase 4 and includes the following outlined steps:
a. ULDC engineering analysis and identification of deficiencies ( completed March 22, 2016) b. Additional Climate Change related analyses and update to the ULDC engineering analysis to consider SJAFCA' sAdopted Climate Adaptation Policy ( completed June 18, 2022) c. Design and environmental evaluation of levee improvements to cure ULDC deficiencies Commenced July 2022, Administrative Draft EIR completed in January 2023. A Final EIR to be completed in mid -2025.)
d. Implement levee improvements to cure ULDC deficiencies. i. Early advancement of improvements through a State/ Local Urban Flood Risk Reduction Program Project
ii. USACE Implementation of a
federally authorized Lower San Joaquin River Lathrop and Manteca, CA Project
Schedule
On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed into law AB 838 which modified the year in which ULOP must be in place for the Mossdale Tract. Further, on April 30, 2024, the Governor signed into law SB 586 which again modified the timeline requirement for ULOP for the Mossdale Tract. Current effective law extends the deadline to 2040. The following schedule of milestones provides the LFMA' s updated current plan to implement the levee improvements by 2040. The updated plan reflects a combined Local/ State and USACE implementation plan where SJAFCA, with funding support from the State constructs a portion of the project, and the USACE constructs the balance. The Project Funding and Financing Approach outlines key milestones for implementation of the various funding mechanisms identified to support the revenue and financing requirements for the Project implementation.
Activity Completion
Phase 3: RD 17 LSRP 12/ 31/ 2023
Phase 4: SJAFCA Project
State/ Local Implementation
Environmental Documentation 6/ 30/ 225
Right of Way Acquisition' 12/ 31/ 2026
Engineering Design' 12/ 31/ 2026
Construction 10/ 31/ 2029
Permitting & Compliance9 12/ 31/ 2027
6 Throughout this report the Phase 4 Project was formerly known as the " Fix -In -Place" Project with the inclusion the extension of the dryland levee in Manteca.
Completion is reflective of possession of the necessary rights to complete the improvements, not necessarily compensation. 8 It is expected that the project would be phased and the first package of engineering plans and specific would be completed in time to commence construction in 2026.
9 Reflects required permitting and ongoing mitigation and monitoring requirements.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
8 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Activity Completion
USACE Implementation
Environmental Documentation 12/ 31/ 2028
Right of Way Acquisition' 6/ 30/ 230
Engineering Design 6/ 30/ 232
Construction 10/ 31/ 2034
Permitting & Compliance9 12/ 31/ 2034
Total Program Costs
Since the 2016 APR, updated cost estimates consolidating all components of the project into a single estimate have been prepared. Table 1 summarizes the total costs for the LSRP and SJAFCA Projects. The total design, permitting, and construction project costs of the LSRP in actual dollars to complete construction is estimated to be $ 80. 96 million. An updated cost estimate of SJAFCA' sProject has been prepared to reflect a single budget addressing ULDC deficiencies and SJAFCA' sClimate Adaptation policy through a combination of locally led and USACE led improvements. The cost estimate for the flood risk management components of the project was updated in early 2023 to reflect design updates to the project based upon the completion of UFRR Study and subsequent 35% preliminary design. More specifically, the cost estimate prepared in 2023 has been refined to reflect expected increased costs of mitigation as well as the requirements to incorporate multi - benefit eco- system restoration requirements needed to secure State cost sharing. The updated cost estimate, in 2023 dollars, is approximately $ 337. million.'°
1° Reference Appendix A - February 24, 2023, Technical Memorandum prepared by Kjeldsen Sinnock Neudeck, Inc. re: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project: 2023 Cost Estimate Update.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates_ Inc
9 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
Table 1- APR
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Program Cost Summary
Project Phase
Actual Costs to
Complete
Updated Project
Costs Including
Climate Adaptation &
Eco- System
Restoration ( 2023$)
LSRP Phase 1 $ 2, 795,61
LSRP Phase 2 (including Parks) $ 13, 068, 589
LSRP Phase 3 $ 65, 095, 249
SJAFCA ULOP Project 337,03, 900
Total Cost 80, 959, 600 $ 337,03, 900
Source: Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck and Larsen Wurzel & Associates, inc.
Prepared by LWA
10 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. x/ sx San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Applicable Geographic Area Reliant on Adequate Progress Report As noted in the 2016 APR and in the Annual Updates, the Adequate Progress Report applies to development afforded ULOP within the Mossdale Tract Area once the Project is complete. Figure 1 shows the results of PBI' s hydraulics analysis included as part of the Engineer' s Report.' 1 The overall area removed from the floodplain as a result of completion of the LSRP and SJAFCA Project is shown as the combined red and blue areas in Figure 1. More specifically, the area with greater than three- footflood depths that would be subject to SB5 development restrictions without the completion of the LSRP and SJAFCA Project is shown in red. is This figure has been updated to reflect updated hydraulics associated with climate change. Future versions of this annual report will reflect the increased area to the East as a result of climate change.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
11 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
PETERSON .
GilIE[ RNG. GONSULTING
BRUBTAo . INC 11,
1160 Iron Point RO., Suite 260 Phone. ( 916) 608- 2212
Fo6om, CA 95630 Fax ( 916) 608- 2232
i,1r,_, c1- 110
0 1
Miles
1 inch = 1 tulle
MAY 6, 2016
Flood Depth
0-3ft
3ft
Limits of Floodplain Modeling
i2] City Spheres of Influence
Stream Centerline
Levee Breach Location
RD 17 Levee
Other Levee/ Embankment
RD 17 Dryland Levee
RD 17 AREA LOCAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT AGENCY
200 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN DEPTHS FOR
AREAS PROTECTED BY RD -17 LEVEES
FIGURE
1 San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Project Funding and Financing Approach
In accordance with SB5, the 2016 APR provided documentation that revenues were identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities. The following discussion restates and, where applicable, updates the revenue sources identified for the projects.
RD 17 began advancing the LSRP in 2008 with the formation of the RD 17 assessment and funding from the DWR' sEarly Implementation Projects ( EIP) and Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) Programs. These revenues sources were utilized to complete the LSRP.
To fund SJAFCA' s ULOP Project, the LFMA has identified the following local sources for the design, environmental review, permitting, and construction of ULOP improvements:
SJAFCA 200 -Year Development Impact Fee
o A Regional SJAFCA 200 -Year Development Impact Fee ( Regional DIF) paid by property owners developing within the 200 -year floodplain was adopted by SJAFCA in November 2018.
Property already entitled and planned for development within the basin that benefits from the Project that has (or will in the future) advanced funds can apply that prior funding as credit towards the Project' sfee obligation via a fee crediting arrangement. In March 2018, SJAFCA Adopted Resolution 19-5 formalizing a crediting program ( Appendix B).
A new Special Benefit Assessment District — the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District o In July 2024, SJAFCA adopted a Resolution of Formation forming the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District ( OAD) (Appendix C). The OAD will commence levying assessment on properties ( parcels) directly receiving flood damage reduction benefit from the construction and long- term O&M of the Project in Fiscal Year 2024/5.
An Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
o An Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District ( EIFD) captures a portion of the growth in general property taxes and dedicates the revenue toward the construction of the Project. In May 2019, SJAFCA commenced the formation effort of an EIFD in May 2019 and in July 2022 the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District Public Financing Authority PFA) approved the formation of the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District. With EIFD' sformation in July 2022, it started generating tax increment revenues in in FY 2022/023. In May 2023, SJAFCA and the PFA formalized the process for transferring funds generated by the EIFD to SJAFCA for the Project through the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding ( Appendix E).
The above local funding sources, including bond proceeds secured by annual OAD revenues, will be utilized by SJAFCA to match State Grant revenues and fund SJAFCA' sshare of the local sponsor obligations of a future USACE Project.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
13 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Governance Approach to Funding & Implementation
Prior to 2016, to facilitate the funding and implementation of the Project, the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca commissioned a governance evaluation. The 2016 APR outlined the governance structure that existed at the time in the Mossdale Tract Area for implementing the LSRP and outlined the entities that would be needed to support the implementation of the Phase 4 Project. The governance evaluation was completed in late 2017 and ultimately resulted in the reorganization of SJAFCA. SJAFCA is now the LFMA and Funding Entity, for the Mossdale Tract Area. SJAFCA now fulfills several distinct governance structures that were previously identified and evaluated to support the implementation, funding, and financing of the Project.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
14 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Project Funding and Financing Plan
In accordance with Government Code § 65007( a), this portion of the 2023 Annual APR Update provides documentation that revenues have been identified to support implementation of the flood protection facilities and further, that sufficient revenues to fund each year of the project schedule have been identified.
The 2016 APR presented a Funding and Financing Plan that has been refined and updated based on the actual progression of the Project' simplementation and additional information obtained subsequent to that report.
Further this section addresses the requirement to demonstrate that in any given year, and consistent with that schedule of identified revenues, at least 90 percent of the revenues scheduled to be received by that year have been appropriated and are currently being expended.
Remaining Project Costs
LSRP Project
This document has been updated since the preparation of the 2016 APR to reflect progress since May 2016 based on the completion of the RD 17' s LRSP. Table 2 has been updated to show the remaining costs of the RD 17 project. It is estimated that there is approximately $ 895, 000 of remaining project costs related to the remaining components of the LSRP as of August 2024.
Phase 4 Project Costs
Table 3 presents the Opinion of Probable Costs prepared by KSN for the Phase 4 Project as of February 2023 which are reflective of the Climate Adaptation update, the completed UFRR Study, and progress made on advancing the preliminary design of the project to a 35% design level. The cost estimates for the flood risk management components of the project were prepared by KSN and updated / augmented by LWA to incorporate the ecosystem and multibenefit improvements and other required non -flood risk management components identified in the UFRR Study required to secured State cost sharing. The costs presented in Table 3 are presented in 2023$' s.
Sources & Uses
An updated financing plan for the implementation of the required levee improvements has been prepared.
Table 4 presents a sources and uses statement based on the updated financing plan and a cash flow model reflective of the progress of the work over the past year and projected completion of the Project by 2040.
Additionally, Table 4 shows the identified revenues that provide the basis for the financing plan. The financing plan is governed by the following assumptions:
The RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment and the associated bond issuances in combination with committed State funding from DWR' s EIP / UFRR program will continue to fund seepage remediation work until full completion which is now scheduled for the end of 2024. This financing plan has been updated to reflect the change in the State cost sharing memorialized through a funding agreement amendment between DWR and RD 17. The State cost sharing split for the LSRP Project is now 60%/ 40% State versus Local Funding.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
15 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Hood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
The following SJAFCA established funding mechanisms provide sufficient funding to match State Grant revenues to both implement the State/ Local Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project then cost share in an authorized Lower San Joaquin Ricer Lathrop and Manteca, CA Project:
o A Regional DIF program collecting revenues in 2018 and updated in 2022. 1 o The Mossdale Tract OAD established in July 2024 collecting annual revenues starting in FY 2024/025.
o The Mossdale Tract EIFD, covering the properties directly benefiting from the project, with a base of FY 2021/022, receiving allocated property tax revenues in FY 2022/023. o A bond authorization and issuance secured by Mossdale Tract OAD revenues in FY 2026/7 with proceeds used to fund construction costs of the State / Local Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project.
Congress authorizes the Lathrop and Manteca Project in 2028, SJAFCA, the Central Valley Flood Protection Board and the USACE enter into a Project Partnership Agreement whereby USACE constructs the remaining improvements needed after SJAFCA' s Urban Flood Risk Reduction project.
The Federal Share of costs of SJAFCA' s Urban Flood Risk Reduction project implemented by SJAFCA are creditable toward SJAFCA and the State' sshare of the remaining Lathrop and Manteca Project improvements constructed by the USACE.
Detailed Cash Flow Analysis and Schedule of Expenses and Revenues To support the Adequate Progress Findings, as described in the 2016 APR, the LFMA must document that 90% of the required revenue scheduled to be received have been appropriated and are being expended. Table 5 presents an updated detailed cash flow analysis showing how the planned expenditures are funded over time.
This schedule is intended to be used by the LFMA to report annually to the CVFPB on the progress of the flood protection system. Table 5 is supported by a series of tables ( reflected in various appendices) that provide details regarding the expenditure and revenues schedule for the LSRP and SJAFCA' s Phase 4 Project.
Government Code § 65007( a) ( 2)(A) Compliance
It is important to note that because ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area is being implemented in multiple stages, by multiple agencies, the financing plan identified for ULOP takes into consideration multiple funding sources.
This approach was outlined in the 2016 APR and continues here. The following discussion breaks the funding sources apart by project and discusses compliance with Government Code § 65007( a).
Within the 2020 Annual APR Update, the analysis associated with Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A) was updated. As noted above, Table 5 presents the updated schedule of revenue and expense projections to demonstrate progress of the project as it relates to the requirements of Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A).
Because of permitting and funding delays related to the LSRP, the estimates, including the overall costs and timing of expenses, as well as the schedule of revenues, have been updated relative to the 2022 Annual APR Update.
12 This action has been completed.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
16 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Consistent with Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A), all of the revenues for the LSRP have been identified.
These revenues included 1) State Funding from the EIP/ UFRR Program and 2) RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment Revenues and Bond Proceeds. Further, consistent with the revised schedule, 90% of the revenues that are scheduled to be received by this year have either been appropriated by a granting agency ( in this case the State) or have been set aside by RD 17 ( reference Table 6). State funding for the RD 17 Project was included within prior State Budget Appropriations and the entirety of RD 17' s grant agreement has been appropriated. As it relates to the local share of the funding, while RD 17 is not required to adopt an appropriated budget by law, 13they have set aside the funds for the Project and entered into contracts and/ or are required by law based on the source of the revenues to expend those funds for the specific purpose of implementing the LSRP ( this is consistent with the intent of a budgetary appropriation). More specifically, those contracts include the EIP Funding Agreement that RD 17 has entered into with DWR as well as the Indenture of Trust Agreements between the District and its Bond Trustee. Finally, as a matter of law, RD 17' s Assessment Revenues must be utilized consistent with its Assessment Engineer' sReport and annual resolution approving the levy of the assessment.
Finally, the last requirement of Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A) is that the revenues scheduled to be received by that year are currently being expended. As noted previously, RD 17 has expended an additional approximately $ 12. 386 million on the LSRP since 2022. RD 17 is currently working to construct the remaining improvements which are expected to be completed by December 2024 at a remaining cost of approximately 890, 00.
For the SJAFCA ULOP Project, funding for SJAFCA' sshare of expenses is to come from a combination of State Funding and Local Funding. 100% of the State funding sources for the Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project have been identified and all funding that has been scheduled to be received has been appropriated by the State. Further, 100% of the revenues scheduled to be received have been expended. The remaining local funding for the program has been identified and there are no requirements of appropriations from local sources. Table 6 shows the cumulative scheduled revenues through 2023, provides an explanation of the authority for the revenues and the associated compliance check with Government Code § 65007( a)( 2)( A).
Table 7 provides the assumed expenditure schedule for the Phase 4 Project. It is expected that these tables will continue to be refined over time as the planning and development of the Projects progresses. 13 Reference Reclamation District No. 17 Financial Statements and Independent Auditor' sReport, June 30, 2017, Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ( Page 13) — "Budgetary accounting: The District does not adopt an appropriated budget and is not required to adopt such a budget by law. However, the District does adopt a non - appropriated budget annually, which is approved by the Board of Trustees."
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
17 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
Table 2
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
RD 17 LSRP Remaining Capital Cost Estimate & Cost Share Item Remaining Costs [ 1] Local 40% [ 2] State 60% [ 2] LSRP - Project Remaining Costs
Phase 1 ROW Remaining Costs 0 0 0
Phase 2 Remaining Costs 5, 000 2, 000 3, 000
Phase 3 Remaining Costs 890, 452 356, 181 534, 271
Total Remaining Cost $ 895, 42 $ 358, 11 $ 537, 21
Remaining Costs as of APR (December 2022) $ 5, 310, 000 Reduction in Remaining Costs [ 3] $ 12, 385, 655
of December 2023 Remaining Project Complete 233%
Source: Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck ( Updated by LWA)
1] Estimated remaining Costs as of December 2022.
2] Amounts are approximate and net of retention withheld by the State on prior incurred Cost by RD 17. 3] Reduction is reflective of work completed inclusive of the change in costs to complete the project. As of December 2022, the total costs to complete were $72, 988, 499. As of the date of this report, the total costs to complete are $ 80, 959, 600, a difference of $ 7, 971, 108.
Prepared by LWA 18
1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx
Table 3
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
ULDC Project Engineer' sOpinion of Probable Cost
Base Project
Item Total Costs ( 2023$)
Soft Costs
Admin / Planning 9, 803, 000
Environmental / Permitting 6, 126, 600
Surveying / Engineering 14, 703, 600
Construction Management 14, 703, 100
Mitigation 18, 382, 000
Subtotal: Soft Costs 63, 718, 300
Construction 122, 50, 400
Right -of -Way Acquisition 76, 213, 000
Contingency 38, 435, 300
Subtotal ULOP Project Costs 300, 887, 000
Multibenefit Improvements 36, 416, 900
Total Cost $ 337,03, 900
Source: Kjeldsen Sinnock & Neudeck February 24, 2023 Technical Memorandum re: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project: 2023 Cost Estimate Update and Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc.
Prepared by LWA
19 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table 4
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
ULOP Adequate Progress Sources & Uses Statement (through 2035) Item Total
2010 to 2035
Notes
Project Uses
LSRP Expenditures
LSRP - Phase I
LSRP - Phase 11 ( including Parks)
LSRP - Phase I I I [ 2]
Subtotal: LSRP Expenditures
ULOP Program Planning & Implementation
Pre -Project Expenditures ( PBI/ LWA/ ETC)
Funding Program Implementation Costs
Feasibility Study & Planning Efforts
Subtotal: ULOP Program Planning & Implementation
2, 665, 761
10, 405, 033
67, 888, 905
80, 959, 700
3, 229, 308
5, 165,58
3, 222, 928
11, 617, 394
SJAFCA Total Protect Expenditures
Soft Costs $ 90, 592, 914
Construction Costs $ 184, 009,13
Right -of -Way $ 120, 862, 516
Contingency $ 56, 627, 076
Multi -Benefit Improvements $ 45, 055, 415
Subtotal: SJAFCA Total Project Expenditures $ 497, 146, 936 less) USACE Implemented Improvements ($ 264, 166, 251) [1] Total Project Uses $ 325, 57, 779
Project Sources
State Funding for LSRP ( EIP Program)
State UFRR Funding ( Preliminary Design Only)
State Funding ( BCP - 0000743)
State Funding ( Future Share of NFS)
Subtotal Non -Local Funding
Local Funding Sources
LSRP Funding
LSRP - RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessments ( Net Revenues) LSRP - RD 17 Mossdale Tract (Bond Revenues)
LSRP - RD 17 Mossdale Tract ( Debt Service)
SJAFCA Project Funding
Developer Advances / City Funding
SJAFCA Overlay Assessment - ULDC
Development Fee Program
EIFD Revenues net of Refunding
Future Mossdale Tract OAD Financing ( Bond Proceeds)
Future Mossdale Tract OAD Financing ( Debt Service Carry) Subtotal Local Funding
Total Project Sources
39, 585,78 [ 2]
3, 833, 330 [ 3]
75, 000,00
25, 327, 047
143, 745, 956
23, 449, 180 [ 4]
35, 603,85 [ 5]
17, 678, 744) [6]
3, 559, 691 [ 7]
25, 978, 182 [ 8]
67,88, 118 [ 9]
34, 986, 058 [ 10]
27, 174, 000 [ 11]
17, 658, 960) [12]
183,01, 211
326, 847, 166
Total Project Sources Tess Uses $ 1, 289, 388
Source: LWA
1) Portion of estimated project costs expected to be constructed by the USAGE. 2] Assumed State Share of Funding for RD 17 LSRP
3] Balance of UFRR Study Funding Agreement for Pre Design and Environmental Review. 4) Assumed share of RD 17 Assessment Revenues that are used to fund Project Costs and Debt Service for the LSRP during the time frame of the Analysis 5] Bond Proceeds assumed to be availble to fund Project Costs as calculated per the Cash Flow Analysis ( Table 5) 6] Debt service for RD 17 PFA Financing during period of analysis. 7] Funding advanced by Cities and Developers from 2010 to 2016 for ULDC Analysis & Implementation of the Funding Program. 8] New overlay assessment revenues during period of implementation. 9] Development Impact fee revenues collected during period of implementation. 10) EIFD revenues collected during period of implementation net of any fee revenues allocated back to Participating Entities during the project' simplementation. 11] Assumed financing secured by OAD Revenues.
12] Debt service for OAD Financing during period of analysis.
Prepared by LWA
20 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Moss.. Tram , 023 , 1411
Re/ ere.. Tonal crcan Ui x030 x011 1012 1033 1014 1015 2010 1011 1028 2019 / 010 20x1 1022 20x3 2024 2695 10. 26 2027 2024 1029 1030 1001 2031 2033 x014 2035 6x2, 343 332 - 612, 137 6.51,16 8, 051, 613 161 101 lol 101 101 lol lol 101 xs3r Phase 06276 lee 09. 43,
3. 51. 1 - Phase 111 111
Stale DP 30. 41, 11. 4331 cie, 611
343/ 4. 1, 449. 180
1, 07, 600 473, 0E5 31, 104 576, 149 6/ 7. 387 411, 081 -
4.99, 039 5. 36,15 2, 611.64 016, 610 1, 52. 919 1, 956. 190 074311 1.4, 734 754, 260 1. 652. 015 11) 08, 991 3, 265, 34. 0 16. 944, 006 5, 901,04 664, 79 p32, w61 1143 x381 3 615131 3316 39, 4 4, 830 137 1,60, 330 1, 711, 570 261,63 1111, 6361 2, 651, 04. 6,5 , 616 8, 051, 623 16, 666, 1111 14,30, 71 1', 485,641 101 101 161 lol 101 130 101 28, 117, 445 /
9, 131, 5841
1, 1 4
116591991 0. 259, 4531 11961, 6601 , 162 6151 ( 1, 251. 1. 41 11,91,x01 11,38, 4141 x1 41
18, 5411601
14 w
1x, 4145541 11, , 4991 ( 3. 424, 0611 11. 416, 1671 11, 4x4, 3611 11! 25, 6111 612, 167 6,51,16 6, 051, 613 lal 101 101 101 lol 101 lo) 101 101 lay lol 101 101 101.
Prepared by LINA Page 1 of 2 180x000 Moss,. Tract Ferenc, Plan 2024 0822. 8
11./.. v.n rave Cre, 211 2010 1011 2012 1913 iota 2913 2016 2017 3013 1019 2919 01111 1012 1012 2024 2025 2026 2027 2029 2029 1039 2011 1032 2033 1034 1032 119379 1, 069154 1350, 469 9, 0429611 10, 294 7n 20, 616, 403 12,91,2 17, 906, 029 x3, 036, 655 1363276 8, 374, 430 ( 10.56,91 16, 2435151 970, 495 6550, 301 30563, 537 36, 071, 359 22129121 319. 211, 1•1112. 3 2.994/ 1. twes
3..r oter 5w• nen. 1es 2667101975161
5011, 3,
11291, 02- 1,2
2,29,06
1, 222, 923
1114, 00,13
27, 06
45, 55, 415
1264,66, 251,
719, 11 719, 212 / 89, 704 1, 001. 181 -
31. 095 963, 59 116, 826 1054, 978 577, 661 16,131
19, 3333261 19603,41 193 7407561 199, 519, 8601 14972914, x341 7192 3. 9 0,11 vs 9s,1x s1, 701 324125 2447, 795 x, 096, 344 x459, 261 1, 739262 9437, x67 11, 33, 197 97, 6x, 22 42779136 9 113, 410 6,12, 144 x156, 001 10343, 941 10, 752455 56, 693, 922 033, 3020, 239 1120 02, 91
22. 011, 290213
OW., INIXkl 25, 76, 1131 .
1211/ 22, 0, 19012, 32Dere10292 6, 292e 339, 303 1,/ 3, 529, 691 - 719, 12 719, 12 7110,4 1 013, 212 206. 901 104, 420 3369113. 1„ re 219, 3926191
996
0 751 7,5/ 6019 777 669
1103926191
x12 339394 , 2 332 1, 033,96 1391, 013 2, 16, 714 7,04, 604 2, 912966 , 122,41 7, 324, 290 14, 27, 693 22761916 26, 12477 24, 145, 976 12739, 609 14329165 14,7, 07 31,61 177 17, 229,76 10, 900, 564 1513, 6201 1, 3193200190. 4 - 21221121146 SAUK,
t,nv 1193.
261
220< eeds 17,74, 000
oral Y1. K: con• 117, 6589601
1 9, 79 19¢ 9134 2330469 4, 04x, 968 10, 239777 10¢¢402 1x, 2320 2906,9 13x13655 19, 565, 376 13, 74 439 219, 153, 7101 135425151 en, os ¢, 550301 22562517 18, 071336 27712, 031 11, 215, 6511 2, 606, 35 2532033 1 2334, 406, 11. 024023, 5, 332. 127 27960, 3371 6x21 119179 949975 1461915 3492499 62531299 3136x4 1374, 320 2. 612, 7 5. 230, 620 1 ( 11,00. 9451 118. 223. 1411 11611,1 2412021 7. 67,05 2301. 3, 137 65003x1 145. 732 390 1512620 11, 9640001 139642001 ( 19623101 11. 329, 501 11960, 51 ( 1. 959,501 21, 937. 3001 119651501 11, 962. 2101 121283 271,, 11111' ENDING 3211211292
Prepared by LWA 22 Page 1 of 2 1801000 Moss., Tract r,ar o,' Plan 2020 OS, xis Table 6
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Government Code 65007 (a) Analysis
Item
Total Revenues Scheduled to be
Appropriated by December 2023
for each Identified Revenue
Per 2023 APR
Appropriation
Applicable
Y, Nor N/ A)
Note
9 y- Details
65007 ( a) Check
Appropriated if
Required
Project Revenues - LSRP
State Funding for LSRP ( EIP Program)
Local Funding Sources
15111, - RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessments ( Net Revenues) LSRP - RD 17 Mossdale Tract ( Bond Revenues/ Cash Balance) LSRP - RD 17 Mossdale Tract ( Debt Service)
Project Revenues • SJAFCA Project
38, 920, 786
23, 449, 180
26, 641, 981
1$ 8, 547, 160)
State UFRR Funding ( PED Only) $ 3, 833, 330
State UFRR Funding ( Implementation)
State Funding ( Future Share of NFS)
SJAFCA Overlay Assessment
Lathrop/ Manteca/ Developer Advance Funding
Development Fee Program
EIFD Revenues
Member Agency Advance Funding
Future EIFD / Assessment Overlay Financing ( Bond Proceeds) Future EIFD / Assessment Overlay Financing ( Debt Service Carry) o
0 0
3, 559, 691
14, 645, 570
925, 309
0 0
0 N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
Part of ProplE Allocation 5096. 821
Project 3860- P1E- 203.
Annual RD 17 Budget
Annual RD 17 Budget
Annual RD 17 Budget
Part of Prop 1E Allocation 5096. 821,
Agreement No. 4600011771
FY 2023/4 State Budget - General
Fund ( Approved Budget Change
Proposal 3860- 031- COBCP- 02023- 5B -
Capital Outlay ID 0000743)
Future Source
SJAFCA Resolution 24-2, SJAFCA
Annual Budget
Agreement / City Council Actions
City Council Actions ( Fee Programs) /
SJAFCA Collection Agreement
EIFD PFA / SJAFCA - PFA MOU,
SJAFCA Annual Budget
Future Source
Future Source
Future Source
N/ A ( 1)
N/ A [ 2]
N/ A ( 3]
N/ A
100% [ 4]
100%
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
5]
6]
71 Source'. LWA, Reclamation District No 17, EMMA, the City of Lathrop. 111 Based on information provided from RD 17 See Table D5 for RD 17 Annual Budgets / Financial Statement Information 121 Reference Table 115 for supporting information on RD 17' s budgets. 131 Based on RD17 Financing Authority' s December 2016 Bond Issuance Official Statement and information from RD 17, represents use of Bond Proceeds and or cash available to fund Capital Outlays. 101 Based on the approved Agreement Amendment and updated budget per Amendment No. 1. 5] Neu/ Assessment to commence levying assessment in FY 2024/5. 171 Bated on actual collected data and funds received by 1.07 CA 161 As reported by SJAFCA based on actual collections and budgeted revenues Prepared by LWA 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. 20sx Table 7
Mossdale Tract 2021 Adequate Progress Report
Future Expenditure Schedule for SJAFCA' sUIOP Project
Year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Total Soft Costs
Admin / Planning $ 0 $ 0 $ 1, 361, 784 $ 1, 429, 873 $ 0 $ 3, 152, 870 $ 3, 448,51 $ 3, 620, 874 $ 304, 153 $ 0 $ 0 13, 318, 005 Environmental / Permitting $ 0 $ 405, 275 $ 1, 063, 846 $ 893, 60 $ 469, 156 $ 1, 231, 534 $ 1, 724, 148 $ 1, 810, 356 $ 570, 262 $ 0 $ 0 8, 168, 207 Surveying/ Engineering $ 0 $ 1, 945, 286 $ 2, 042, 551 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4, 729, 015 $ 5, 172, 360 $ 5, 430, 978 $ 456, 202 $ 0 $ 0 19, 776, 393 Construction Management $ 0 $ 486, 305 $ 2, 042, 481 $ 2, 144, 605 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7, 983, 267 $ 8, 382, 430 $ 754, 419 21, 793, 507 Mitigation $ 0 $ 0 $ 2, 553,36 $ 2, 681, 212 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,80, 780 $ 11, 378, 090 $ 943, 184 27, 536, 802 Subtotal Soft Costs - 2, 836,66 9, 064, 197 7, 149, 321 469, 156 9, 113, 420 10, 344, 960 10, 862, 208 19, 294, 665 19, 760, 820 1, 697,02 90, 592, 914 Construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 4, 254, 980 $ 19, 360, 161 $ 15, 637, 053 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 66, 524, 274 $ 69, 850, 487 $ 8, 382, 058 184, 009,13 Real Estate ( Wise Use) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 95, 048, 689 95, 048, 689 Real Estate ( New) $ 1, 083, 600 $ 6, 371, 568 $ 6, 451, 213 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5, 808, 511 $ 6, 098, 936 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 25, 813,27 Contingency $ 0 $ 0 $ 5, 339, 240 $ 5, 606, 202 $ 3, 433, 799 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,72, 760 $ 20, 660, 328 $ 1, 314, 748 56, 627, 076 Multi - Benefit Improvements $ 0 $ 0 $ 6, 323, 567 $ 15, 492, 739 $ 23,39, 109 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 45, 055, 415 Total Expenses
Source . KIN / Pei / LW n
1, 083, 600 9, 208, 434 31, 433, 197 47, 608, 422 42, 779, 116 9, 113, 420 16,53, 471 16, 961, 144 106, 091, 699 110, 271, 335 106, 443, 098 497, 146, 936 Prepared by LWA 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Evaluation of Identified Revenues
This section identifies, describes, and presents the updated evaluation of the funding sources for the remaining levee improvement work previously identified in the 2016 APR. The combined use of these sources is dependent on several factors including implementation timing. A discussion of the implementation timing of the planned funding mechanisms follows this section.
RD 17 LSRP Project — RD 17 Assessment Revenues/ State EIP Funding Appendix D provides an updated expenditure schedule for the LSRP as well as the supporting analysis of the identified revenues for implementation with funds from the RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment and DWR' s EIP program. This analysis supports the net revenues identified in Table 5 that are available to support the implementation of the Phase 4 Project after completion of the LSRP.
Development Fees & Advance Funding
Currently, SJAFCA, through an amended collection agreement with the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, Stockton, and San Joaquin County is collecting fees as a condition of development within the Project' s benefit area. On July 12, 2022, SJAFCA adopted Resolution R- 22- 135 approving an Update to the Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Nexus Study ( Nexus Study Update) and a related collection agreement amendment ( reference Appendix B). Subsequently, the Cities of Lathrop, Manteca, Stockton, and San Joaquin County adopted the Nexus Study Update and authorized the collection of the new fee between September and November 2022. As such, the portions of the Mossdale Tract Area that include planned development projects that lie within the 200 -year Floodplain ( the Phase 4 Project benefit area) will need to mitigate the impact of development in the floodplain and pay the Regional DIF. This funding will ensure that improvements can be made to flood control infrastructure to mitigate increases in expected annual damages.
To ensure that sufficient revenues are made available from this mechanism to meet the near -term cash flow demands of the project, the Land Use Agencies entered into agreements with landowners to advance some of the fee obligation and utilize this advanced funding as credit toward payment of the fee. An analysis showing an allocation of the costs to planned development is documented in the " Mossdale Tract Area:
Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Final Nexus Study Update" dated November 16, 2022. The current financing plan reflected within this APR reflects the updated fee rate effective as of December 2022. Appendix B shows the actual revenues received through July 2024 and projections of the revenues to come from the Updated Regional Fee Program overtime. In addition, the analysis considers the escalation of the fee rates over time based on the approved indexed escalation rate incorporated into the approved updated Fee.
To continue to advance the Phase 4 Project the Land Use Agencies have utilized Agency and developer advance funding and fee revenue collections. This funding has been utilized to support ongoing efforts including the formation of the EIFD and the planning and implementation of an Overlay Assessment expected in 2024. Early funding is expected to be reimbursed to the Agencies ( in the future) or, in the case of developer advanced funding, creditable toward the DIF Program as described above.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
25 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District
Given the fact that a significant portion of the beneficiaries of the SJAFCA ULOP Project are already developed properties within the Mossdale Tract Area, the 2016 APR described a plan to move forward with the formation of a new special benefit assessment district that would overlay the existing RD 17 Mossdale Tract Assessment the previously described OAD). RD 17' s existing Mossdale Tract Assessment currently generates more than
3. 2 million per year with an average residential assessment of approximately $ 96 per year. To test the feasibility of a new OAD, a detailed analysis of the apportionment of special benefits for the Phase 4 Project was completed as part of the financial analyses associated with the Governance Analysis completed in late 2017. In July 2024, after a successful Proposition 218 property owner ballot proceeding, SJAFCA formed the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District with the adoption of a SJAFCA Resolution No. 24-2 (Appendix C). The new OAD will levy approximately $2.4 million across all parcels within the Assessment District with an average residential per parcel assessment of approximately $ 70 in addition to the existing assessment. The revenues reflected in Table 5 reflect the approved assessment and a conservative increase of 2% per year in annual revenues to support the project.
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
In July 2022 SJAFCA' s Member Land Use Agencies formed the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District. The EIFD allows for the use of Tax Increment Financing for the regional flood control improvements. The entities initiated the process by forming a new Public Financing Authority that includes members of the legislative bodies of the public agencies as well as two public members. The Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District Public Financing Authority ( EUIFD PFA) prepared an Infrastructure Financing Plan ( IFP) that describes the funding for the construction of regional flood control improvements that provide benefit to the Mossdale Tract Area. The IFP identifies the participating taxing entities within the EIFD and the share of Property Tax Increment each participating entity in the EIFD would allocate to the Project over time.
EIFD / Special Benefit District Financing
Appendix E provides reference to the location of IFP on SJAFCA' swebsite. This document includes an analysis of the projected revenues to come from the proposed EIFD. The revenues projected within the IFP, which are reflected within the financing plan presented in this APR, have been updated to reflect actual revenues for the first 3 years of the EIFD. Tax Increment revenues will flow to the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastrcutrue Financing District Public Financing Authority which is the governance entity established pursuant to EIFD Law tasked with implementing the improvements identified within the IFP. The PFA and SJAFCA have entered into an MOU to allow for the transfer of Tax Increment funds from the PFA to SJAFCA.
To ensure sufficient revenues are available to finance the improvements, SJAFCA plans to issue debt secured by Overlay Assessment District revenues and utilize Tax Increment Revenues on a pay as you go basis to meet the local cost share obligation of the project. An updated analysis of the financing capacity of the proposed OAD has been prepared and is included within Appendix E. Figure 2 below illustrates the revenues, proposed bond issuance, and debt service associated with the planned financing.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates Inc
26 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
The updated Financing Plan assumes the following borrowing take place:
One borrowing in 2027 yielding approximately $ 27. 17 million in proceeds ( estimated $ 30. 16 Million Par) takes place. The borrowings would be secured by the proposed assessment district with 3 years of collection history and rate covenant of 1. 2x Maximum Annual Debt Service. The current financing plan assumes a 30 -year issue with 3.6% interest rates and level debt service. The issue is with an estimated 100% of Maximum Annual Debt Service reserve fund.
The Financing Plan presented with this 2023 Annual APR Update has refined the Overlay and EIFD Revenue Analyses previously presented. As shown in the IFP referenced in Appendix E, the EIFD revenue analysis has been prepared to present the following property tax revenue allocation rate scenarios as follows:
EIFD Contribution Rate
Initial Years
Affected Taxing Entity ( 2021- 2029) 2030 - 2032 2033 - 2043 2044 - 2061 Maximum Tax Rate Scenario
City of Lathrop
City of Manteca
City of Stockton
San Joaquin County
10. 0%
5.0%
1.0%
47. 3%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
20. 0%
Variable Tax Rate Scenario
City of Lathrop
City of Manteca
City of Stockton
San Joaquin County
10. 0%
5.0%
1.0%
47. 3%
13. 0%
13. 0%
13. 0%
13. 0%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
4.5%
4.5%
4.5%
4.5%
The Variable Tax Rate Scenario has been modeled and created additional capacity to provide the necessary revenues to cover project needs on a pay- as- you- go basis over time. Need is shown in Table F1 and demonstrated in the chart presented in Figure 2.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
27 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
Figure 2: Assessment Revenue & EIFD Tax Increment Financing Approach SJAFCA Mossdale Tract ULOP Project
Combined Assessment Revenue, EIFD Tax Increment & OAD Financing OAD & EIFD based on Approved IFP Formations)
s 10, 000,o0
9, 000,00
58, 000,00
7, 000,00
6, 000,00
5, 000,00
4, 000,00
3, 000,00
S2, 000,00
S1, wo, 000
LWA
So
New Development
2020-057
EIFD Notes:
Variable allocation rate until 2029 shifting to 13% in 2030 and further down overtime. Limit of aooroximately S5. 0to 55. 7 annually for combined debt service EIFD Establishment ( 2022/3)
OAD Formation (2023/4)
2025 AR Bond Issuance ($)
Level Debt Service, Senior/ Subordinate Issue
19' 1, 9 1,9 19
4'
19 19, 71 1.9 1919 19 19 19 19 19 19 ,
SO , 11o, 54' L• So, ryoti,i-19- 1n1h1bry1' 0- 19- 91. 19 19y~ 19y319 19 ti4019 Net Assessment Revenue ( Paygo, Debt Service & Coverage) aaae , of. Tax Increment Revenue for Paygo and Coverage
LARSEN WURZEL
Associates, Inc
28 mom*, Tax Increment Revenue for Debt Service
AD Debt Service
1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2023 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
September 3, 2024
The OAD provides revenues sufficient for the required debt service and, in addition, the revenues needed to provide coverage for the bonds would be available and are authorized to provide ongoing operations and maintenance for the improved levee system.
Status and Schedule for Local Funding & Financing Implementation The following matrix outlines a conceptual schedule and details the status for the implementation of the contemplated funding mechanisms and associated financing of the improvements.
Activity Start End Duration ( 1) Status
MOU Principles June 1, 2016 N/ A Completed
Prepare and Review ULOP
Adequate Progress Report
June 1, 2016 N/ A Completed
Enter into MOU June 30, 2016 N/ A Completed
Adopt ULOP Adequate Progress
Findings
July 2, 2016 N/ A Completed
Develop Funding/ Governance
Evaluation Framework
March 2016 N/ A Completed
Prepare Financial & Governance
Analysis Supporting Governance
Entity & Financial Plan
September
2017
N/ A Completed
Implement Governance Entity
Enter into JPA & ( SJAFCA
Reorganization)
December
2017
N/ A Completed
Implement Funding Mechanisms
Interim Impact Fee April
2017
N/ A Completed
Regional Impact Fee
Adoption
January
2018
December
2018
N/ A Completed
Regional Impact Fee
Update
June
2021
November
2022
N/ A Completed
Overlay Assessment
District Formation
June
2018
July
2024
N/ A Completed
EIFD Adoption and EIFD
Formation
September
2018
August
2022
N/ A Completed
Administration
Ongoing
Implement Financing Entity/
Mechanism
Issue Debt 2027 N/ A
The above information will continue to be updated annually as progress is made. The information above coincides with the cash flow model assumptions presented within Table 5 and the supporting analysis appendices.
LWA LARSEN WURZEL
Associates. Inc
29 1801014 Mossdale APR 2023 Update 2024 0903. docx
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX A:
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 19- 06:
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT POLICY ON ADAPTING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA OF SJAFCA IN LIGHT OF CLIMATE CHANGE FEBRUARY 24, 2023, TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM PREPARED BY KJELDSEN SINNOCK NEUDECK, INC. RE: SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT AREA URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT: 2023 COST
ESTIMATE UPDATE
Reso 19- 06 SJAFCA Resolution Adopting Policy re: Climate Change Al Tech Memo Technical Memo Detailing Updated Cost Estimate A7 LWA
LARSEN WURZE[
Associates. Inc
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2024 0903. docx RESOLUTION NO. SJAFCA 19- 06
SAN JOAQUIN AREA
FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT POLICY ON ADAPTING DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR THE MOSSDALE TRACT AREA OF SJAFCA IN
LIGHT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
WHEREAS, the overwhelming consensus of the international scientific community, as established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and confirmed by the National Academy of Sciences, is that climate change is a real and increasingly urgent threat that demands action at every level of government; and WHEREAS, the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta ( hereinafter Delta) is a unique natural and geographic feature of the State of California, and is the largest estuary on the Pacific Coast of the United States encompassing an area of over 730, 00 acres with islands and tracts of rich fertile soil surrounded by miles of sloughs and winding channels protected by levees; and
WHEREAS, climate change is directly impacting San Joaquin County citizens through sea level rise, flooding, increased wildfires, drought, and air pollution harming the public health; and
WHEREAS, further climate change is expected to impact the region' stemperatures, precipitation and sea level with consequences for the area population, agriculture, environment and infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, to protect these critical resources, the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency must continually evaluate the risks and impacts from climate changer uncertainties and identify appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies utilizing the best available science in conjunction with stakeholders for adapting design standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, AS FOLLOWS:
That the Policy on Climate Change is hereby approved and adopted, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference.
SJAFCA Resolution 19- 06
A- 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2019.
ATTEST:
HRIS ELIAS, Secretary
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
L. SHA` IRI, Legal Counsel
f .r a San Joaquin rea
Flood Control • - ncy
DRA IE, Chair
n Joaquin Area
ontrol Agency
SJAFCA Resolution 19- 06
A- 2
EXHIBIT "A"
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Policy for Adapting Design Standards
for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA
in Light of Climate Change Uncertainties
February 7, 2019
Introduction
The San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) is advancing a program for increasing the level of flood protection provided by the Mossdale Tract levees through ( i) development of locally -funded improvements, (ii) partnering with the State on potential State funding of improvements, and/ or (iii) the pursuit of a Federally -authorized set of improvements. In the development of locally -funded improvements and other improvements which may be cost -shared with the State and Federal governments, it is necessary to select the appropriate future hydrology, considering climate change estimates, to inform design -level work. Unfortunately, the uncertainties ( magnitude, timing, and nature of frequency) associated with accurately predicting that future hydrology requires that the agency balance the flood risk associated with understating that hydrology with the financial costs associated with overstating that hydrology. The purpose of this document is to provide a Board -adopted policy for managing that risk specifically for the Mossdale Tract levees.
In addition, the passage of SB5 has imposed on communities in the Central Valley an obligation to ensure that future development will be subject to at least 200 -year flood protection. The Department of Water Resources ( DWR) has developed guidance for the Urban Level Of [ Flood] Protection ( ULOP) including findings that must be made Available Data on Climate Change Through Hydrologic Studies Climate change, as it applies to Mossdale Tract levees, is comprised of both tailwater conditions as well as watershed hydrology. Tailwater conditions are important because water surface profiles are calculated from downstream to upstream, and tailwater elevation ( also known as " stage") is an input to the model. In the case of the San Joaquin River, the downstream limit of the hydraulic model is roughly the Deep Water Ship Channel near the Smith Canal Gate project. The stage at that location is affected by sea level, tide cycles, hydraulics of the Delta, physical configuration of the Delta in a given event, storm surge, flood flows from the various tributary rivers and streams entering the Delta, and to some extent, wind setup ( if all or part of the Delta were to become a large body of open water in the future, for instance). Sea level rise is an essential component of tailwater conditions to consider.
Although sea level rise at the Golden Gate Bridge has been studied extensively, the science and engineering of predicting San Joaquin River tailwater conditions and watershed hydrology is new. The only study to date to address both aspects of climate 1 A- 3
EXHIBIT "A"
change for the San Joaquin River is the work by the State associated with the 2017 Update of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ( CVFPP). That study concludes that significant changes are likely for both tailwater conditions and San Joaquin River flows as a result of climate change. For example, the 200 -year event in the year 2067 is estimated by the 2017 CVFPP as a tailwater stage of 12. 6', a stage which would overtop numerous Delta islands and overwhelm many existing and proposed facilities. In terms of watershed hydrology, the CVFPP also predicts a tripling of 200 -year flood flows by the year 2067.
Additional Relevant Information
Until the development of the 2017 CVFPP Update, communities developing programs of improvements were required, under the ULOP guidelines, to address the risk of climate change without DWR generated estimates of tailwater conditions coupled with watershed hydrology. For example, in preparing adequate progress reports under ULOP for the River Islands Community of Lathrop, the City of Lathrop designed to the current hydrology, incorporated information from consensus sea level rise, and then added a further foot to the stage to address the uncertainty of changes to watershed hydrology as a result of climate change. Similarly, projects designed on the Sacramento River system have also incorporated additional stage or freeboard to address the uncertainty of changes to watershed hydrology as a result of climate change.
During the development of the 2017 CVFPP Update, commentators provided written comments to DWR regarding the significant changes projected by the Update and whether investment decisions should be made based on the Update. In response, DWR provided the following:
The 2017 CVFPP Update climate change analysis was used for system -scale planning and development of State policy in accordance with the directives and guidance of AB 2800, Executive Order B 30- 15, Executive Order S- 13- 08, Public Resources Code 71155, and the California Natural Resources Agency publication, Safeguarding California: Reducing Climate Risk ( 2014)" at a programmatic level. It has not been used to make investment - level decisions, project design, and implementation. While the 2017 CVFPP Update refines the overall near and long- term investment needs established in the 2017 CVFPP, it is not a decision document. Given the current state of climate change science and its uncertainties, application of the climate change projections for design purposes would not be appropriate at this time.
A more detailed programmatic account of the climate change analyses and summary of the findings is presented in the supporting document " 2017 CVFPP Update — Climate Change Analysis Technical Memorandum." The document also recommends further study:
Addressing uncertainty by evaluating a broader set of future climate scenarios, or sensitivity analyses.
2 A- 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Additional study to gain insight about reservoir climate vulnerability and potential adaptation needs.
The use of levee fragility and flood frequency curves is incorporated into the probabilistic methodology used for the CVFPP flood risk and potential life loss evaluations of the urban levee improvements and systemwide actions. Levee fragility data was developed based on the Nonurban/ Uran Levee Evaluations program undertaken by the State. Further details on the methods and sources of data can be found in the " 2017 CVFPP Update — Scenario Technical Analyses Summary Report" which supports the 2017 CVFPP Update.
Agency Policy
Based on the statement from DWR, it is not expected that SJAFCA use the 2017 CVFPP Update as a basis for design- and investment - level decisions. However, the trend of the 2017 CVFPP Update demonstrates that climate change will increase both the flows projected to flow down the San Joaquin River and increase the tailwater stages. DWR' s climate change estimates are for 50 years in the future only, and those estimates show the trends are still worsening at the end of that period with no eventual " leveling out" of the effects.
SJAFCA' spolicy for design- and investment - level decisions must address this trend and the risk associated with uncertainty without using the DWR estimates which were not prepared for this purpose. The Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency acknowledges that this policy may result in a future finding by a land use agency that the designed ( or potentially constructed) project will not be able to provide 200 -year flood protection in light of changing conditions caused by climate change or other factors, and that achieving and maintaining a particular level of flood protection often requires a community to recommit itself to implement further measures.
Therefore, it is the policy of the Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency that design- and investment -level decisions shall incorporate the following elements ( which are considered to be no, low, or medium regret to address the uncertainty of climate change) until such time as that uncertainty is reduced.
Incorporation of additional stage at the downstream boundary of the San Joaquin River hydraulic model to cover " intermediate" estimates of sea level rise per U. S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance, plus an additional factor for uncertainty; The inclusion of some additional measure of stage in levee design. This additional stage will differ in different reaches to be determined by SJAFCA staff based upon input from consultants and partner agencies, but is expected to be in the zero to three- foot range;
3 A- 5
EXHIBIT "A"
Where real estate is being acquired for project improvements ( and where land use coordination as described below is not adequate), SJAFCA will acquire the necessary real estate to support potential future levee raises and/ or extensions based on the 2017 CVFPP climate change hydrology;
Coordination with relevant land -use agencies in and around current and future levee alignments to ensure approved development can accommodate expanded levee footprints and extended levee alignments;
At least every three years, and more often when the state of the science demands, staff shall review available studies and models and make recommendations to the Board whether this policy needs to be updated.
SJAFCA will request that each land use agency within the Mossdale Tract annually provide to SJAFCA a summary of any findings made toward adequate progress;
SJAFCA will develop cost estimates to provide SJAFCA with necessary resources to further study and evaluate this issue through and after project completion.
4 A- 6
KrJELDSEN 9 INNOCK
N EUDECK
mc. InC. ENr rve¢ asENGINEERS & e urvo LAND SURVEYORS wavcra+ s
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
Project: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Area
Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project
Subject: 2023 Cost Estimate Update
Prepared by: Erik E. Almaas, PE
Reviewed by: Christopher H. Neudeck, PE
Stephen K. Sinnock, P. E.
Christopher H. Neudeck, P. E.
Neal T. Colwell, P. E.
Barry O' Regan, P. E.
2255- 0060
08- 300- 010
1. Introduction
Detailed analyses have previously been performed on the existing levee system conditions of Reclamation District No. 17 ( RD17) in order to determine the extent of Urban Levee Design Criteria ULDC) compliance. Documentation of the analyses in the form of a ULDC Engineer' sReport in 2016 was performed by a team consisting of Peterson, Brustad, Inc. (PBI), Kjeldsen, Sinnock and Neudeck, Inc. (KSN), and ENGEO, Inc. The results of the analyses indicated that substantial improvements were needed to the RD17 levees, including a proposed eastward extension of the RD17 Dryland Levee. The overall estimated cost of these improvements amounted to nearly $ 137 million, based on 2015 dollars.
In 2019, a new climate change evaluation including hydrological and hydraulic analyses was performed by PBI to refine potential climate change impacts in accordance with San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) policy. The results of this new evaluation indicated substantial elevated levels to the 200 -year Design Water Surface Elevation ( DWSE) along the RD17 levee, especially at the upstream end of the RD17 boundary. Additional improvements were identified based on the updated climate change evaluation, including the need to extend the proposed RD17 Dryland Levee extension even further to the east. The overall estimated cost of these incremental improvements amounted to nearly 57 million, based on 2015 dollars.
In 2021, the cost estimates from the 2016 ULDC Engineer' sReport and the 2019 climate change evaluation were consolidated into a single cost estimate and updated to 2021 dollars. As a result, the overall consolidated, estimated cost of all the improvements increased from $ 194 million ( 2015 dollars) to approximately $230 million ( 2021 dollars).
In 2023, project drawings were prepared by KSN at a 35% design level which included refinements to the proposed RD17 Dryland Levee extension alignment and other minor adjustments. Material quantities were also calculated as part of the 35% design and compared to previous assumptions.
The purpose of this technical memorandum is to update the 2021 cost estimate to 2023 dollars and incorporate the 35% design and material refinements.
Corporate Office 711 N Pershing Avenue I Stockton CA 95203 1209- 946. 0268 I www ksninc corn 1';' est Sacramento 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 212 I V,' est Sacramento, CA 95691 1916- 403- 5900 A- 7
K TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
inc. Page 2 of 6
2. Summary of 2021 Cost Estimate
The updated, consolidated cost estimate from 2021 was based on 14. 47 miles fix -in -place levee improvements and 2. 75 miles of new levee, and the overall project cost amounted to approximately 230 million in 2021 dollars. As stated earlier, this cost estimate was based on assumptions developed in the 2016 ULDC Engineer' s Report and the 2019 climate change evaluation. A breakdown of the 2021 cost estimate is shown below in Table 1. A detailed breakdown of the improvement costs on a project -by -project basis for the 2021 cost estimate is included in EXHIBIT 1 Table 1 — Summary of 2021 Cost Estimate
Project Station Station
ID From To Project Na
1 119+ 50 148+ 00 Cutoff Wall 9, 354, 000
2 172+ 45 192+ 00 Cutoff Wall
3 190+ 50 247+ 00 Seepage Berm
4 255+ 50 259+ 50 Seepage Berm
5 270+ 00 297+ 75 Seepage Berm
6 311+ 00 362+ 50 Cutoff Wall
7 388+ 00 518+0 Cutoff Wall
8 570+ 0 822+0 Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River
9 703+ 00 741+ 30 Cutoff Wall
10 781+ 00 799+ 50 Cutoff Wall
11 822+0 853+ 50 Levee Raise @ Walthall Slough
12 853+ 50 959+ 00 Levee Raise & Seepage Berm @ Dryland Levee 13 0+0 959+ 00 Erosion Repairs
14 0+0 959+ 00 Right -of -Way (existing)
15 959+ 00 1104+ 20 Dryland Levee Extension
5, 331, 000
17, 002,00
1,38, 000
7, 389, 000
12, 337, 000
30, 954, 000
17, 390, 000
7, 673, 000
3, 716, 000
1, 941, 000
38,74, 000
10, 851, 000
14, 284, 000
52, 275, 000
Total: $ 230, 09,00
3. Data Sources
Existing data sources that were utilized in the levee assessment are as follows:
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) Evaluation — Identify Necessary Improvements and Cost Estimate. March 3, 2016.
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Adjustments for Climate Change Cost Estimate. December 12, 2019.
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Mossdale Tract Area ULDC Climate Change Adjustment — Consolidated Cost Estimate. January 2021.
4. Levee Assessment
This levee assessment covers the RD17 levee from Station 0+0 to Station 908+ 60. It also covers a proposed Dryland Levee Extension that is required to extend the existing Dryland Levee eastward in order to meet ULDC compliance. A summary of the levee segments that were analyzed is shown below in Table 2.
A- 8
K
8 N
nc.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
Table 2 - Summary of Analyzed Levee Segments
2021 Cost, Estinaie 2022 irpst
Levee Segment
French Camp Slough
San Joaquin River
Walthall Slough
Dryland Levee
Dryland Levee
Extension
Totals: 20. 91
Notes:
1) The end station of the proposed Dryland Levee Extension was previously represented in the 2021 cost estimate as Station 1104+ 20. However, the actual assumed improvements used in the development of the cost estimate were based on an end station of Station 1052+ 00 pursuant to SJAFCA climate change policies.
StattpFrom StationFrom To
a on
lies) From To
1. 91
13. 67
0. 58
2. 00
0+0 101+ 00
101+ 00 822+0
822+0 853+ 50
853+ 50 959+ 00
959+ 00 1052+ 00( 1)1. 76
0+0 101+ 00
101+ 00 822+0
822+0 853+ 50
853+ 50 908+ 60
908+ 60 1030+ 53
1. 91 Existing
13. 67 Existing
0. 58 Existing
1. 04 Existing
2. 31 Proposed
19. 51
5. Refinements from 35% Design
The existing RD 17 Dryland Levee begins at Station 853+ 50 at Woodward Avenue and meanders 2. 51 miles to the east to Station 985+5 at nearly Airport Way. The recommendations described in the original 2016 ULDC Engineer' sReport proposed to construct a new Dryland Levee Extension beginning at Station 972+ 25 and extending 3. 29 miles to the east beyond Airport Way along an arbitrary alignment.
Since the original 2016 ULDC Engineer' sReport, the alignment of the Dryland Levee Extension has continuously been refined with newer evaluations and analyses resulting in the updated cost estimates in 2021 and 2023. A summary of the various Dryland Levee Extension alignments is shown below in Table 3. A map of the two Dryland Levee Extension alignments is included in EXHIBIT 2.
Table 3 - Refinements to the New Dryland Levee Extension 2021 Cost Estimate.
Description
Fix -in -Place Repairs to
RD 17 Dryland Levee
Dryland Levee Extension 959+ 00 1052+ 00( 1) 1. 76 908+ 60 1030+ 53 2023. Cost
Station Station Length Station iti
From To ( miles) From To
853+ 50 959+ 00 2. 00 853+ 50 908+ 60
miles)
1. 04
2. 31
Notes:
1) The end station of the proposed Dryland Levee Extension was previously represented in the 2021 cost estimate as Station 1104+ 20. However, the actual assumed improvements used in the development of the cost estimate were based on an end station of Station 1052+ 00 pursuant to SJAFCA climate change policies
As the 35% design was being developed, quantities of construction materials were calculated. These quantities were compared to preliminary assumptions, and the 2023 cost estimate was updated with the new quantities accordingly. A map of the project sites pursuant to the 35% design is shown below in Figure 1.
A- 9
K
S
N
inc.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
1 in = 2 miles
0 Stockton
2 3
4 Howard Road
5 Lathrop Road
81Lathrop
9 10
1 12, y
15 Q
Summary of Project Sites
Project Station Station
Begin End Description
1. 119+ 50 148+ 00 Cutoff Wall
2. 172+ 45 192+ 00 Cutoff Wa ll
3. 190+ 5 247+ 00 Seepage Berm
4. 255+ 50 259+ 50 Seepage Berm
5. 270+ 0 297+ 75 Seepage Berm
6. 311- 1- 00 362+ 50 Cutoff Wall
7. 388+ 00 518+0 Cutoff Wall
Levee Raise
8. 570+ 0 822+0 @ San Joaquin River
9. 703+ 00 741+ 30 Cutoff Wall
10. 781+ 00 799+ 50 Cutoff Wall
11. 822+0 853+ 50
Levee Raise
@ Walthall Slough
Levee Raise & Seepage Berm
@ Dryland Levee
Erosion Repairs
Right -of -Way ( existing)
Dryland Levee Extension
12. 853+ 50 908+ 60
13. 0+0 908+ 60
14. 0+0 908+ 60
15. 908+ 60 1030+ 53
Manteca
Union
Road
Main
Street
Legend
w—-- RD 17 Levee Centerline
Project Type
gin• mmis Cutoff Wall
Extension
Levee Raise
Seepage Berm
Note:
Erosion Repairs ( Project ID 13) and
Existing Right -of -Way (Project ID 14)
projects are not shown for clarity.
F1p
K KJELDSEN
N
S
S SINNOCK
NEUDECK
inc. Ir1C CIVILeH weensaaHowmemas ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 711 N. Pershing Avenue
Stockton, CA95203
209- 946- 0268
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 212
West Sacramento, CA95691
916- 403- 5900
www. ksninc. com
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
PROJECT SITES
Figure 1 — 35% Design Project Sites
A- 10
K
8 N
cc
Inc.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
6. Update of Cost Estimate to 2023 Dollars
The update of the cost estimate from 2021 dollars to 2023 dollars was accomplished utilizing the Construction Cost Index (CCI) published monthly by Engineering News -Record ( ENR). The CCI is an indicator of general construction costs and includes labor and materials components. ENR uses the CCI to measure how much it costs to purchase a hypothetical package of goods and services and compare it to what it was in a prior year. The CCIs that were used in this assessment are shown below in Table 4.
Table 4 - ENR CCIs and Escalation Factor
Description
ENR CCI ( January 2021)
ENR CCI ( February 2023)
Escalation Factor
Value
11627. 94
13175. 93
1.331
The unit costs of the consolidated cost estimate were then adjusted by multiplying them by the above - described Escalation Factor. Afterwards, the adjusted unit costs were compared to bids from recent comparable projects in the area. All but four of the adjusted unit costs were determined to be reasonable, and a manual adjustment was made to the remaining four. A summary of the unit cost adjustments for these four items is shown below in.
st Es'.
Description Unit Unit Cost
Class 2 Aggregate Base ton
Drain Rock Material ton
Imported Engineered Fill ton
Sand Filter Material ton
29 35
18 29
Cell
with ERR CI
33 40
20 33
ent'
45 45
25 45
7. Cost Estimate Conclusions
Overall, the project cost estimate increased by $ 606, 000 from 2021 to 2023. A breakdown of the general cost estimate adjustments is shown below in Table 5.
Table 5 - General Cost Estimate Adjustments
Description Amount
2021 Cost Estimate
ENR CCI Adjustment from Jan 2021 to Feb 2023
Reconfiguration and Material Quantity Refinements at the Dryland Levee Extension in 35% Design
Other Material Quantity Refinements in 35% Design
2023 Cost Estimate
230, 09,00
61, 296, 000
50, 746, 000
9,44, 000
230, 615, 000
The updated 2023 cost estimate for the project is summarized below in Table 6. A detailed breakdown of the improvement costs on a project -by -project basis for the 2023 cost estimate is included in EXHIBIT 3.
A- 11
K
Sgi
N
Inc.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
February 24, 2023
Table 6 - Summary of 2023 Cost Estimate
Project Station Station
ID From To Project Name Cost
1 119+ 50 148+ 00 Cutoff Wall $ 9, 775, 000
2 172+ 45 192+ 00 Cutoff Wall $ 4,59, 000
3 190+ 5 247+ 00 Seepage Berm $ 20,55, 000
4 255+ 50 259+ 50 Seepage Berm $ 1, 545, 000
5 270+ 0 297+ 75 Seepage Berm $ 9, 131, 000
6 311+ 00 362+ 50 Cutoff Wall $ 15, 753, 000
7 388+ 00 518+0 Cutoff Wall $ 36, 056,00
8 570+ 0 822+0 Levee Raise @ San Joaquin River $ 23, 115, 000 9 703+ 00 741+ 30 Cutoff Wall $ 7, 126, 000
10 781+ 00 799+ 50 Cutoff Wall $ 3,07, 000
11 822+0 853+ 96 Levee Raise @ Walthall Slough $ 1, 273, 000 12 853+ 96 908+ 60 Levee Raise & Seepage Berm @ Dryland Levee $ 15, 800, 000 13 0+0 908+ 60 Erosion Repairs $ 12, 310, 000
14 0+0 908+ 60 Right -of -Way ( existing) $ 16,72, 000
15 908+ 60 1030+ 53 Dryland Levee Extension $ 54,38, 000 Total: $ 230, 615, 000
A- 12
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Area
Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project
2023 Cost Estimate Update
EXHIBIT 1
2021 Cost Estimate Breakdown
A- 13
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 1
CUTOFF WALL
STA 119+ 50 TO STA 148+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
5. Deep Mix Method ( DMM) Cutoff Wall
6. Tracer Wire
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 42" Pipe
11. Air Release Valve
12. 8" Valve
13. 42" Valve
14. Encroachment Removal
15. Encroachment Modification
16. Hydroseedin9
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
5. 4
83, 300
2, 900
23, 900
2, 100
2 6
8 2
6 3
1 128, 300
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac • uisition
Project Totals
AC
SF
LF
TN
TN
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
0. AC
0 EA
10%
3%
2, 000
20 2
15 25
45, 000
250, 00
2, 000
2, 500
70, 000
10, 000
20, 000
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
25, 000
50, 000
4, 732, 000
418, 800
125, 700
10, 800
1, 666, 000
5, 800
358, 500
52,00
90, 000
1, 500, 000
16, 000
5, 000
420, 00
30, 000
20, 000
12, 900
1, 893, 000
236, 600
142, 000
236, 600
94, 700
473, 200
567, 900
142, 000
0 0
0 10%
3%
2, 400
24 3
18 29
51, 900
288, 100
2, 400
2, 900
80, 700
11, 600
23, 100
0. 12
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
5,67,00
492, 700
147, 900
13, 000
1, 999, 200
8, 700
430, 20
60, 900
103, 800
1, 728, 600
19, 200
5, 800
484, 200
34, 800
23, 100
15, 400
2,27, 300
278, 400
167,00
278, 400
111, 400
556, 800
668, 100
167,00
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 15
A- 14
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 2
CUTOFF WALL
STA 175+ 45 TO STA 192+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
5. Deep Mix Method ( DMM) Cutoff Wall
6. Tracer Wire
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 8" Valve
14. 12" Valve
15. 16" Valve
16. Encroachment Removal
17. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Con
10%
3%
3. 7 AC $ 2, 000
88, 000 SF $ 20
2, 000 LF $ 2
16, 500 TN $ 15
1, 500 TN $ 25
2 EA $ 45, 000
1 EA $ 60, 000
1 EA $ 80, 000
4 EA $ 2, 000
2 EA $ 2, 500
1 EA $ 4, 000
1 EA $ 8, 500
3 EA $ 10, 000
88, 000 SF $ 0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
2, 656, 400
235, 100 10%
70, 600 3%
7, 400 $ 2, 400
1, 760, 000 $ 24
4, 000 $ 3
247, 500 $ 18
37, 500 $ 29
90, 000 $ 51, 900
60, 000 $ 69, 200
80, 000 $ 92, 200
8, 000 $ 2, 400
5, 000 $ 2, 900
4, 000 $ 4, 700
8, 500 $ 9, 800
30, 000 $ 11, 600
8,00 $ 0. 12
1, 062, 900
132, 900 5%
79,00 3%
132, 900 5%
53, 200 2%
265, 700 10%
318, 800 12%
79,00 3%
0 0 $ 28, 900
0 $ 57, 700
3, 173, 000
280, 80
84, 300
8, 900
2, 112, 000
6, 000
297, 000
43, 500
103, 800
69, 200
92, 200
9, 600
5, 800
4, 700
9, 800
34, 800
10, 600
1, 269, 400
158, 700
95, 200
158, 700
63, 500
317,00
380, 80
95, 200
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 2 of 15
A- 15
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 3
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 190+ 50 TO STA 247+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
13. Air Release Valve
14. 8" Valve
15. 10" Valve
16. 16" Valve
17. 20" Valve
18. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
20. 8
159, 200
99, 200
49,00
675, 300
4, 200
4 2
1 1
8 4
2 1
1 743, 100
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acciuisition
AC
TN
TN
TN
SF
TN
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
12. 7 AC
7 EA
3%
3%
2, 000
15 30
25 0. 50
25 45, 000
55, 000
80, 000
95, 000
2, 000
2, 500
3, 000
8, 500
18, 000
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
25, 000
50, 000
8, 142, 200
230, 50
230, 50
41, 600
2, 388, 000
2, 976, 000
1, 235, 000
337, 700
105, 000
180, 00
110, 00
80, 000
95, 000
16, 000
10, 000
6, 000
8, 500
18, 000
74, 400
3, 257, 300
407, 200
244, 300
407, 200
162, 900
814, 300
977, 100
244, 300
667, 500
317, 500
350, 00
3%
3%
2, 400
18 35
29 0. 58
29 51, 900
63, 400
92, 200
109, 500
2, 400
2, 900
3, 500
9, 800
20, 800
0. 12
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
9, 569, 200
270, 90
270, 90
50, 000
2, 865, 600
3, 472, 000
1, 432, 600
391, 700
121, 800
207, 600
126, 800
92, 200
109, 500
19, 200
11, 600
7, 000
9, 800
20, 800
89, 200
3, 828, 000
478, 500
287, 100
478, 500
191, 400
957, 000
1,48, 400
287, 100
771, 000
367, 100
403, 900
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 3 of 15
A- 16
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 4
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 255+ 50 TO STA 259+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
10. Air Release Valve
11. 10" Valve
12. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. 4 AC
9,00 TN
6, 000 TN
3, 000 TN
40, 800 SF
300 TN
1 EA
1 EA
1 EA
45, 600 SF
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac • uisition
3%
3%
2, 000
15 30
25 0. 50
25 55, 000
2, 000
3, 000
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. 7 AC $ 25, 000
1 EA $ 50, 000
528, 800
15, 000 3%
15, 000 3%
2, 800 $ 2, 400
148, 500 $ 18
180, 00 $ 35
75, 000 $ 29
20, 400 $ 0. 58
7, 500 $ 29
55, 000 $ 63, 400
2, 000 $ 2, 400
3, 000 $ 3, 500
4, 600 $ 0. 12
211, 800
26, 500 5%
15, 900 3%
26, 500
10, 600 2%
52, 900 10%
63, 500 12%
15, 900 3%
67, 500
17, 500 $ 28, 900
50, 000 $ 57, 700
5%
621, 000
17, 600
17, 600
3, 400
178, 200
210, 00
87, 000
23, 700
8, 700
63, 400
2, 400
3, 500
5,00
248, 800
31, 100
18, 700
31, 100
12, 500
62, 100
74, 600
18, 700
78, 000
20, 300
57, 700
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 4 of 15
A- 17
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 5
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 270+ 00 TO STA 297+ 75
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 10" Valve
14. 12" Valve
15. 16" Valve
16. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
9. 1
68,00
41, 600
20, 400
283, 100
2, 100
1 2
1 4
1 2
1 316, 400
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac. uisition
AC
TN
TN
TN
SF
TN
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
5. 1 AC
4 EA
3%
3%
2, 000
15 30
25 0. 50
25 55, 000
60, 000
80, 000
2, 000
3, 000
4, 000
8, 500
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
25, 000
50, 000
3, 512,00
99, 500
99, 500
18, 200
1, 029,00
1, 248, 000
510, 00
141, 600
52,00
55, 000
120, 00
80, 000
8, 000
3, 000
8, 000
8, 500
31, 700
1, 405, 300
175, 700
105, 400
175, 700
70, 300
351,00
421, 500
105, 400
327, 500
127, 500
200, 00
3%
3%
2, 400
18 35
29 0. 58
29 63, 400
69, 200
92, 200
2, 400
3, 500
4, 700
9, 800
0. 12
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
4, 127, 500
116, 900
116, 900
21, 900
1, 234, 800
1, 456, 000
591, 600
164, 200
60, 900
63, 400
138, 400
92, 200
9, 600
3, 500
9, 400
9, 800
38, 000
1, 651, 300
206, 400
123, 900
206, 400
82, 600
412, 800
495, 300
123, 900
378, 200
147, 400
230, 80
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 5 of 15
A- 18
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 6
CUTOFF WALL
STA 311+ 00 TO STA 362+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
5. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
7. Tracer Wire
8. Imported Engineered Fill
9. Class 2 Aggregate Base
10. Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
12. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
13. Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe
14. Air Release Valve
15. 6" Valve
16. 8" Valve
17. 10" Valve
18. 14" Valve
19. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
10. 8
23, 500
354, 200
9, 200
5, 200
108, 800
3, 900
1 1
3 1
6 1
1 3
1 314, 200
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Contin . e 0 t 20
AC
CY
SF
CY
LF
TN
TN
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
10%
3%
2, 000
10 8
10 2
15 25
40, 000
45, 000
55, 000
75, 000
2, 000
2, 000
2, 500
3, 000
7, 000
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
6, 001, 700
531, 200
159, 400
21, 600
235, 000
2, 833, 600
92, 000
10, 400
1, 632, 000
97, 500
40, 000
45, 000
165, 000
75, 000
12, 000
2, 000
2, 500
9, 000
7, 000
31, 500
2, 401, 000
300, 10
180,0
300, 10
120,0
600, 20
720, 30
180,0
0 0
0 7, 343, 200
10% $649, 900
3% $195, 000
2, 400 $ 26, 000
12 $ 282, 000
10 $ 3, 542, 000
12 $ 110, 40
3 $ 15, 600
18 $ 1, 958, 400
29 $ 113,00
46, 100 $ 46, 100
51, 900 $ 51, 900
63, 400 $ 190, 20
86, 500 $ 86, 500
2, 400 $ 14, 400
2, 400 $ 2, 400
2, 900 $ 2, 900
3, 500 $ 10, 500
8, 100 $ 8, 100
0. 12 $ 37, 800
2, 937, 500
5% $367, 200
3% $220, 30
367, 200
2% $146, 900
10% $734, 400
12% $ 881, 200
220, 30
0 0
0 5%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 6 of 15
A- 19
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 7 STA 388+ 00 TO
CUTOFF WALL
STA 518+0
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
5. Soil- Bentonite (SB) Cutoff Wall
6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
7. Tracer Wire
8. Imported Engineered Fill
9. Class 2 Aggregate Base
10. Reconstruct Existing 4" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe
12. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
13. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
14. Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe
15. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
16. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
17. Reconstruct Existing 36" Pipe
18. Air Release Valve
19. 4" Valve
20. 6" Valve
21. 10" Valve
22. 12" Valve
23. 14" Valve
24. 16" Valve
25. 20" Valve
26. 36" Valve
27. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
27. 3
59,00
827, 000
23,00
13, 000
275, 600
9, 600
1 2
2 5
2 3
1 1
17 1
2 2
5 2
3 1
1 796, 000
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Contin s enc . 20%
3%
AC $ 2, 000
CY $ 10
SF $ 8
CY $ 10
LF $ 2
TN $ 15
TN $ 25
EA $ 35, 000
EA $ 40, 000
EA $ 55, 000
EA $ 60, 000
EA $ 75, 000
EA $ 80, 000
EA $ 95, 000
EA $ 200, 00
EA $ 2, 000
EA $ 1, 500
EA $ 2, 000
EA $ 3, 000
EA $ 4, 000
EA $ 7, 000
EA $ 8, 500
EA $ 18, 000
EA $ 55, 000
SF $ 0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
15,02, 800
10% $1, 336, 600
401, 000
54, 600
595, 000
6,16, 000
232, 000
26, 000
4, 134, 000
240, 00
35, 000
80, 000
110, 00
300, 00
150, 00
240, 00
95, 000
200, 00
34, 000
1, 500
4, 000
6, 000
20, 000
14, 000
25, 500
18, 000
55, 000
79, 600
6, 041, 400
755, 200
453, 100
755, 200
302, 100
1, 510, 30
1, 812, 400
453, 100
0 0
0 18, 424, 200
10% $1, 630, 500
3% $489, 200
2, 400 $ 65,00
12 10
12 3
18 29
40,00
46, 100
63, 400
69, 200
86, 500
92, 200
109, 500
230, 50
2, 400
1, 800
2, 400
3, 500
4, 700
8, 100
9, 800
20, 800
63, 400
0. 12
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
714, 000
8, 270, 000
278, 400
39, 000
4, 960, 800
278, 400
40,00
92, 200
126, 800
346, 000
173, 000
276, 600
109, 500
230, 50
40, 800
1, 800
4, 800
7, 000
23, 500
16, 200
29, 400
20, 800
63, 400
95, 600
7, 370, 200
921, 300
552, 800
921, 300
368, 500
1, 842, 500
2,11, 000
552, 800
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 7 of 15
A- 20
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 8
LEVEE RAISE
STA 570+ 0 TO STA 822+0
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Floodwall ( 3' tall)
6. Class 2 Aggregate Base
7. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
8. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
9. Reconstruct Existing 18" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 48" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 12" Valve
14. 16" Valve
15. 18" Valve
16. 20" Valve
17. 48" Valve
18. Encroachment Removal
19. Encroachment Modification
20. Hydroseeding
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Co _,
8, 370, 100
3% $236, 900 3%
3% $236, 900 3%
43. 6 AC $ 2, 000 $ 87, 200 $ 2, 400
339, 700 TN $ 15 $ 5, 095, 500 $ 18
2, 400 LF $ 125 $ 300, 00 $ 145
18, 800 TN $ 25 $ 470, 00 $ 29
3 EA $ 60, 000 $ 180, 00 $ 69, 200
1 EA $ 80, 000 $ 80, 000 $ 92, 200
4 EA $ 85, 000 $ 340, 00 $ 98, 000
1 EA $ 95, 000 $ 95, 000 $ 109, 500
1 EA $ 300, 00 $ 300, 00 $ 345, 700
10 EA $ 2, 000 $ 20, 000 $ 2, 400
3 EA $ 4, 000 $ 12, 000 $ 4, 700
1 EA $ 8, 500 $ 8, 500 $ 9, 800
4 EA $ 14, 000 $ 56, 000 $ 16, 200
1 EA $ 18, 000 $ 18, 000 $ 20, 800
1 EA $ 85, 000 $ 85, 000 $ 98, 000
31 EA $ 10, 000 $ 310, 00 $ 11, 600
3 EA $ 100, 00 $ 300, 00 $ 115, 300
1, 390, 400 SF $ 0. 10 $ 139,00 $ 0. 12
3,48, 700
5% $418, 600 5%
3% $251,00 3%
5% $418, 600 5%
2% $167, 500 2%
10% $837, 100 10%
12% $1, 004, 500 12%
3% $251,00 3%
515, 300
8. 6 AC $ 25, 000 $ 215, 300 $ 28, 900
6 EA $ 50, 000 $ 300, 00 $ 57, 700
9,25, 400
281, 000
281, 000
104, 700
6, 114, 600
348, 000
545, 200
207, 600
92, 200
392, 000
109, 500
345, 700
24, 000
14,00
9, 800
64, 800
20, 800
98, 000
359, 600
345, 900
166, 900
3, 970, 500
496, 300
297, 800
496, 300
198, 600
992, 600
1,91,00
297, 800
595, 100
248, 900
346, 200
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 8 of 15
A- 21
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 9
CUTOFF WALL
STA 703+ 00 TO STA 741+ 30
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height) 17, 400
4. Soil- Bentonite (SB) Cutoff Wall 306, 400
5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle) 6, 700
6. Imported Engineered Fill 37, 600
7. Tracer Wire 3, 800
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac. uisition
CY
SF
CY
TN
LF
10%
3%
10 8
10 15
2 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
3, 688, 200
326, 400
98, 000
174, 000
2, 451, 200
67, 000
564, 000
7, 600
1, 475, 700
184, 500
110, 70
184, 500
73, 800
368, 900
442, 600
110, 70
0 0 $ 28, 900
0 $ 57, 700
4, 566, 900
10% $404, 200
3% $121, 300
12 $ 208, 800
10 $ 3, 064,00
12 $ 80, 400
18 $ 676, 800
3 $ 11, 400
1, 827, 200
5% $228, 400
137,00
228, 400
2% $91, 400
10% $ 456, 700
12% $ 548, 100
3% $137,00
0 0
0 3%
5%
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 9 of 15
A- 22
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 10
CUTOFF WALL
STA 781+ 00 TO STA 799+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
4. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
6. Imported Engineered Fill
7. Tracer Wire
8, 500
148, 000
3,00
18, 300
1, 900
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac • uisition
o. i sY
Project Totals
CY
SF
CY
TN
LF
1, 785, 900
10% $158,00 10%
3% $47, 500 3%
10 $ 85, 000 $ 12
8 $ 1,84, 000 $ 10
10 $ 33, 000 $ 12
15 $ 274, 500 $ 18
2 $ 3, 800 $ 3
714, 600
5% $89, 300
3% $53, 600
89, 300
2% $35, 800 2%
10% $178, 600 10%
12% $ 214, 400 12%
53, 600
0 0 $ 28, 900
0 $ 57, 700
5% 5%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
3%
2,11,00
195, 700
58, 800
102, 000
1, 480, 000
39, 600
329, 400
5, 700
884, 900
5% $110, 60
3% $66, 400
110, 60
44, 300
221,00
265, 400
66, 400
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 10 of 15
A- 23
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 11
LEVEE RAISE @ WALTHALL SLOUGH
STA 822+0 TO STA 853+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Class 2 Aggregate Base
6. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
7. Air Release Valve
8. 20" Valve
9. Hydroseeding
5. 3 AC
47, 600 TN
2, 300 TN
1 EA
1 EA
1 EA
168, 900 SF
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Project Totals
3%
3%
2, 000
15 25
95, 000
2, 000
18, 000
0. 10
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
0. AC $ 25, 000
0 EA $ 50, 000
969, 000
27, 500
27, 500
10, 600
714, 000
57,00
95, 000
2, 000
18, 000
16, 900
387, 800
48, 500
29, 100
48, 500
19, 400
96,00
116, 300
29, 100
0 0
0 3%
3%
2, 400
18 29
109, 500
2, 400
20, 800
0. 12
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
1,54, 700
32, 700
32, 700
12, 800
856,00
66, 700
109, 500
2, 400
20, 800
20, 300
462, 200
57, 800
34, 700
57, 800
23, 100
115, 500
138, 600
34, 700
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 11 of 15
A- 24
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 12
LEVEE RAISE & SEEPAGE BERM @ DRYLAND LEVEE
STA 853+ 50 TO STA 972+ 25
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Traffic Control
4. AC Pavement Repairs
5. Clearing and Grubbing
6. Imported Engineered Fill
7. Drain Rock Material
8. Sand Filter Material
9. Filter Fabric
10. Class 2 Aggregate Base
11. Encroachment Modification
12. Hydroseeding
13. Quarry Stone Riprap
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1 LS
20, 000 SF
50. 9 AC
569, 900 TN
170, 40 TN
79, 800 TN
928, 400 SF
15, 700 TN
1 EA
1, 519, 200 SF
14, 000 TN
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
18, 810,00
3% $532, 400
3% $532, 400
50, 000 $ 50, 000
10 $ 200, 00
2, 000 $ 101, 800
15 $ 8, 548,00
30 $ 5, 112, 000
25 $ 1, 995, 000
0. 50 $ 464, 200
25 $ 392, 500
100, 00 $ 100, 00
0. 10 $ 152, 000
45 $ 630, 00
7, 524, 700
5% $940, 60
3% $564, 400
940, 60
2% $376,00
10% $1, 881, 100
12% $2,57, 300
3% $564, 400
735, 000
485, 000
250, 00
5%
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
19. 4 AC
5 EA
25, 000
50, 000
22,34, 400
3% $629, 300
3% $629, 300
57, 700 $ 57, 700
12 $ 240, 00
2, 400 $ 122, 200
18 $ 10, 258,00
35 $ 5, 964, 000
29 $ 2, 314, 200
0. 58 $ 538,00
29 $ 455, 300
115, 300 $ 115, 300
0. 12 $ 182, 400
52 $ 728, 000
8,94, 200
5% $1,11, 800
667, 100
5% $1,11, 800
2% $444, 700
10% $2,23, 500
12% $2, 668, 200
3% $667, 100
849, 200
560, 70
288, 500
3%
28, 900
57, 700
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 12 of 15
A- 25
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 13
EROSION REPAIRS
STA 0+0 TO STA 959+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Quarry Stone Riprap
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
34. 0 AC
115, 600 TN
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
Easement Ac. uisition
0. AC
0 EA
3%
3%
2, 000
45 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
25, 000
50, 000
5,86, 200
158,00
158,00
68, 000
5, 202, 000
2,34, 900
279, 400
167, 600
279, 400
111, 800
558, 700
670, 40
167, 600
0 0
0 3%
3%
2, 400
52 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
6, 458,00
182, 800
182, 800
81, 600
6, 011, 200
2, 583, 800
323, 000
193, 800
323, 000
129, 200
645, 900
775, 100
193, 800
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 13 of 15
A- 26
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 14
RIGHT- OF- WAY ACQUISITION ( EXISTING DEFICIENCIES)
STA 0+0 TO STA 959+ 00
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Land Valuation ( Residential)
3. Land Valuation ( Commercial)
4. Improvement Valuation ( Residential)
5. Easement Acquisition
Easement Ac• uisition Oak Shores
40. 7 AC
3. 0 AC
1. 0 AC
15 EA
113 EA
1 EA
25, 000
250, 00
250, 00
150, 00
50, 000
400, 00
10, 317, 500
1, 017, 500
750, 00
250, 00
2,50, 000
5, 650, 000
400, 00
11, 903, 200
28, 900 $ 1,76, 300
288, 100 $ 864, 300
288, 100 $ 288, 100
172, 900 $ 2, 593,00
57, 700 $ 6, 520, 100
460, 90 $ 460, 90
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 14 of 15
A- 27
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA ULDC COST ESTIMATE UPDATE TO 2021$
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit
2015$
Unit Price Total
2021$
Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 15
DRYL
STA
AND LEVEE EXTENSION
959+ 00 TO STA 1104+ 20
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Traffic Control
4. AC Pavement Repairs
5. Clearing and Grubbing
6. Excavate Levee Keyway
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Drain Rock Material
9. Sand Filter Material
10. Filter Fabric
11. Class 2 Aggregate Base
12. Encroachment Removal
13. Encroachment Modification
14. Relocate Ditch
15. Hydroseeding
16. Quarry Stone Riprap
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac. uisition
Project Totals
3%
3%
1 LS $ 120, 00
70, 000 SF $ 10
80. AC $ 5, 000
38, 800 CY $ 10
958, 800 TN $ 15
110,0 TN $ 30
33, 100 TN $ 25
742, 500 SF $ 0. 50
10, 800 TN $ 25
2 EA $ 50, 000
3 EA $ 100, 00
9, 100 LF $ 10
1, 761, 100 SF $ 0. 10
26, 500 TN $ 45
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
82. 7 AC $ 25, 000
22 EA $ 50, 000
23, 983, 300
678, 800
678, 800
120, 00
700, 00
404, 200
388, 000
14, 382, 000
3,03, 000
827, 500
371,00
270, 00
100, 00
300, 00
91, 000
176, 200
1,92, 500
9, 593,00
1,99, 200
719, 500
1,99, 200
479, 700
2, 398, 400
2, 878, 000
719, 500
3, 167, 500
2, 067, 500
1,00, 000
3%
3%
138, 300
12 5, 800
12 18
35 29
0. 58
29 57, 700
115, 300
12 0. 12
52 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
28, 900
57, 700
28, 501, 800
806, 700
806, 700
138, 300
840, 00
468, 900
465, 600
17, 258, 400
3, 853, 500
959,00
430, 70
313, 200
115, 400
345, 900
109, 200
211, 400
1, 378, 000
11, 401, 000
1, 425, 100
855, 100
1, 425, 100
570, 10
2, 850, 200
3, 420, 300
855, 100
3, 659, 500
2, 390, 100
1, 269, 400
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 15 of 15
A- 28
Print Date: 1/ 29/021
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Area
Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project
2023 Cost Estimate Update
EXHIBIT 2
Dryland Levee Extension Comparison
A- 29
2121 ROAM
160206 861602 6. 02 1. 2626
LI MY 60 2426 02261121102
12 OA. 112. 1. 61 61FNq/ Z 2K M t1 Crtr1M60. FNF
12 216/ 110 W. OA N. 1IAIQF1. 10 R11.. 2F
16 6.0 106. 0 1. 76 PEW 02Y. 210122FIX246102
aa1P0ACT
866604 swam MEE
MOM 0 011. 21102
66. I60. a +a 111. AAA12. 17OM. MAE
MO. MO. 211 NM MAIO LAU AMA.
A- 30
difb 6
KJELOSEN
SINNOCK
NEUIDECK 1550145. 5. 5. 212
B16. 55500
aria JIL
11111111 lllll
R+Y ' sysr , e ' ANA, 5,1 PR,. L5, Et
I I I I I I I I I iz1 F1nN PLACE FM uo„ o„ .,, oLEVEE
I-771L 1
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
DRYLAND LEVEE EXTENSION COMPARISON
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Mossdale Tract Area
Urban Flood Risk Reduction Project
2023 Cost Estimate Update
EXHIBIT 3
2023 Cost Estimate Breakdown
A- 31
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 1 STA 119+ 50
CUTOFF WALL
TO STA 148+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
5. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 42" Pipe
11. Air Release Valve
12. 8" Valve
13. 42" Valve
14. Encroachment Removal
15. Encroachment Modification
16. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
5. 4 AC
12,00 CY
69, 100 SF
5, 100 CY
51, 900 TN
2,00 TN
2 EA
6 EA
8 EA
2 EA
6 EA
3 EA
1 EA
128, 300 SF
0. AC
0 EA
10%
3%
2, 700
14 11
14 25
45 58, 800
326, 400
2, 700
3,00
91, 400
13,00
26, 700
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
5, 818, 000
514, 900
154, 500
14, 600
169, 400
760, 10
71, 400
1, 297, 500
99, 000
117, 600
1, 958, 400
21, 600
6,00
548, 400
39,00
26, 700
18, 000
2, 327, 400
290, 90
174, 600
290, 90
116, 400
581, 800
698, 200
174, 600
0 0
0 Conti :
Project Totals 9, 775, 000
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 1 of 15
A- 32
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 2
STA 175+ 45
CUTOFF WALL
TO STA 192+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
5. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 8" Valve
14. 12" Valve
15. 16" Valve
16. Encroachment Removal
17. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac • uisition
3. 7 AC
13, 400 CY
80, 500 SF
3, 500 CY
30, 500 TN
1, 500 TN
2 EA
1 EA
1 EA
4 EA
2 EA
1 EA
1 EA
3 EA
88, 000 SF
10%
3%
2, 700
14 11
14 25
45 58, 800
78, 400
104, 500
2, 700
3,00
5, 300
11,00
13,00
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
2, 653, 500
234, 900
70, 500
10, 000
187, 600
885, 500
49, 000
762, 500
67, 500
117, 600
78, 400
104, 500
10, 800
6,00
5, 300
11,00
39,00
12, 400
1, 061, 800
132, 700
79,00
132, 700
53, 100
265, 400
318, 500
79,00
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 2 of 15
A- 33
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 3
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 190+ 5 TO STA 247+ 00
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
13. Air Release Valve
14. 8" Valve
15. 10" Valve
16. 16" Valve
17. 20" Valve
18. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Contilrt
3%
3%
20. 8 AC $ 2, 700
195,00 TN $ 25
78, 600 TN $ 45
19, 700 TN $ 45
675, 300 SF $ 0. 66
4, 300 TN $ 45
4 EA $ 58, 800
2 EA $ 71, 900
1 EA $ 104, 500
1 EA $ 124,00
8 EA $ 2, 700
4 EA $ 3,00
2 EA $ 4, 000
1 EA $ 11,00
1 EA $ 23, 600
743, 100 SF $ 0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
12. 7 AC $ 32, 700
7 EA $ 65, 300
11, 432, 800
323, 600
323, 600
56, 200
4, 877, 500
3, 537, 000
886, 500
445, 700
193, 500
235,00
143, 800
104, 500
124,00
21, 600
13, 200
8, 000
11,00
23, 600
104,00
4, 573, 400
571, 700
343, 000
571, 700
228, 700
1,43, 300
1, 372, 000
343, 000
872, 400
415, 300
457, 100
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 3 of 15
A- 34
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 4
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 255+ 50 TO STA 259+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
10. Air Release Valve
11. 10" Valve
12. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac. uisition
Project Totals
1. 4 AC
16, 700 TN
4, 500 TN
1, 200 TN
40, 800 SF
400 TN
1 EA
1 EA
1 EA
45, 600 SF
0. 7 AC
1 EA
3%
3%
2, 700
25 45
45 0. 66
45 71, 900
2, 700
4, 000
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
856, 400
24, 300
24, 300
3, 800
417, 500
202, 500
54, 000
27, 000
18, 000
71, 900
2, 700
4, 000
6, 400
342, 900
42, 900
25, 700
42, 900
17, 200
85, 700
102, 800
25, 700
88, 200
22, 900
65, 300
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 4 of 15
A- 35
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 5
SEEPAGE BERM
STA 270+ 00 TO STA 297+ 75
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Drain Rock Material
6. Sand Filter Material
7. Filter Fabric
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 10" Valve
14. 12" Valve
15. 16" Valve
16. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
9. 1 AC
94, 000 TN
31, 400 TN
7, 900 TN
283, 100 SF
2, 100 TN
1 EA
2 EA
1 EA
4 EA
1 EA
2 EA
1 EA
316, 400 SF
5. 1 AC
4 EA
3%
3%
2, 700
25 45
45 0. 66
45 71, 900
78, 400
104, 500
2, 700
4, 000
5, 300
11,00
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
5, 128, 900
145, 200
145, 200
24, 600
2, 350, 000
1, 413, 000
355, 500
186, 900
94, 500
71, 900
156, 800
104, 500
10, 800
4, 000
10, 600
11,00
44, 300
2, 051, 800
256, 500
153, 900
256, 500
102, 600
512, 900
615, 500
153, 900
428, 000
166, 800
261,00
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 5 of 15
A- 36
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 6
STA 311+ 00
CUTOFF WALL
TO STA 362+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
5. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
6. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Class 2 Aggregate Base
9. Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 8" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
12. Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe
13. Air Release Valve
14. 6" Valve
15. 8" Valve
16. 10" Valve
17. 14" Valve
18. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac • uisition
in
10. 8 AC
31, 600 CY
328, 200 SF
9, 200 CY
135, 800 TN
4, 000 TN
1 EA
1 EA
3 EA
1 EA
6 EA
1 EA
1 EA
3 EA
1 EA
314, 200 SF
0. AC
0 EA
10%
3%
2, 700
14 11
14 25
45 52, 300
58, 800
71, 900
98, 000
2, 700
2, 700
3,00
4, 000
9, 200
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
9, 376, 600
829,00
249, 000
29,00
442,00
3, 610, 200
128, 800
3,95, 000
180, 00
52, 300
58, 800
215, 700
98, 000
16, 200
2, 700
3,00
12, 000
9, 200
44, 000
3, 750, 900
468, 900
281, 300
468, 900
187, 600
937, 700
1,25, 200
281, 300
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 6 of 15
A- 37
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 7
CUTOFF WALL
STA 388+ 00 TO STA 518+0
Construction
Mobilization
Erosion Control
Clearing and Grubbing
Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
Imported Engineered Fill
Class 2 Aggregate Base
Reconstruct Existing 4" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 6" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 10" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 14" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
Reconstruct Existing 36" Pipe
Air Release Valve
4" Valve
6" Valve
10" Valve
12" Valve
14" Valve
16" Valve
20" Valve
36" Valve
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
9. 10.
11. 12.
13. 14.
15. 16.
17. 18.
19. 20.
21. 22.
23. 24.
25. 26. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Conti
27. 3 AC
66, 100 CY
760, 80 SF
23, 300 CY
277, 000 TN
9,00 TN
1 EA
2 EA
2 EA
5 EA
2 EA
3 EA
1 EA
1 EA
17 EA
1 EA
2 EA
2 EA
5 EA
2 EA
3 EA
1 EA
1 EA
796, 000 SF
0. AC
0 EA
10%
3%
2, 700
14 11
14 25
45 45, 700
52, 300
71, 900
78, 400
98, 000
104, 500
124,00
261,00
2, 700
2, 000
2, 700
4, 000
5, 300
9, 200
11,00
23, 600
71, 900
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
21, 461, 200
1, 899, 300
569, 800
73, 800
925, 400
8, 368, 800
326, 200
6, 925, 000
445, 500
45, 700
104, 600
143, 800
392, 000
196, 000
313, 500
124,00
261,00
45, 900
2, 000
5, 400
8, 000
26, 500
18, 400
33,00
23, 600
71, 900
111, 500
8, 584, 900
1,073,00
643, 900
1, 073, 100
429, 300
2, 146, 200
2, 575, 400
643, 900
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 7 of 15
A- 38
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 8
LEVEE RAISE
STA 570+ 00 TO STA 822+0
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Floodwall ( 3' tall)
6. Class 2 Aggregate Base
7. Reconstruct Existing 12" Pipe
8. Reconstruct Existing 16" Pipe
9. Reconstruct Existing 18" Pipe
10. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
11. Reconstruct Existing 48" Pipe
12. Air Release Valve
13. 12" Valve
14. 16" Valve
15. 18" Valve
16. 20" Valve
17. 48" Valve
18. Encroachment Removal
19. Encroachment Modification
20. Hydroseeding
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
Contin
43. 6
350, 90
1, 300
19, 300
3 1
4 1
1 10
3 1
4 1
1 31
3 1, 390, 400
AC
TN
LF
TN
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
8. 6 AC
6 EA
3%
3%
2, 700
25 164
45 78, 400
104, 500
111, 000
124,00
391, 700
2, 700
5, 300
11,00
18, 300
23, 600
111, 000
13,00
130, 60
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
13, 277, 500
375, 800
375, 800
117, 800
8, 772, 500
213,00
868, 500
235,00
104, 500
444, 000
124,00
391, 700
27, 000
15, 900
11,00
73, 200
23, 600
111, 000
406, 100
391, 800
194, 700
5, 311,00
663, 900
398, 400
663, 900
265, 600
1, 327, 800
1, 593, 300
398, 400
673, 400
281, 600
391, 800
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 8 of 15
A- 39
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 9
CUTOFF WALL
STA 703+ 00 TO STA 741+ 30
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
4. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
6. Imported Engineered Fill
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
35, 500 CY
287, 500 SF
6, 700 CY
0 TN
0. AC
0 EA
4, 241, 300
10% $ 375, 400
3% $ 112, 600
14 $ 497, 000
11 $ 3, 162, 500
14 $ 93, 800
25 $ 0
1, 696, 900
5% $ 212, 100
3% $ 127, 300
5% $ 212, 100
2% $ 84, 900
10% $ 424, 200
12% $ 509, 000
127, 300
0 0
0 3%
32, 700
65, 300
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 9 of 15
A- 40
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 10
CUTOFF WALL
STA 781+ 00 TO STA 799+ 50
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Degrade Existing Levee ( 1/ 3 Height)
4. Soil- Bentonite ( SB) Cutoff Wall
5. Temporary Cap ( Double Handle)
6. Imported Engineered Fill
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Accuisition
17, 300 CY
132, 200 SF
3, 200 CY
0 TN
0. AC
0 EA
10%
3%
14 11
14 25
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
1, 967, 700
174, 200
52, 300
242,00
1, 454, 200
44, 800
0 787, 400
98, 400
59, 100
98, 400
39, 400
196, 800
236,00
59, 100
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 10 of 15
A- 41
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 11
LEVEE RAISE @ WALTHALL SLOUGH
STA 822+0 TO STA 853+ 96
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Imported Engineered Fill
5. Class 2 Aggregate Base
6. Reconstruct Existing 20" Pipe
7. Air Release Valve
8. 20" Valve
9. Hydroseeding
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Ac• uisition
5. 3 AC
16, 700 TN
2, 400 TN
1 EA
1 EA
1 EA
168, 900 SF
0. AC
0 EA
3%
3%
2, 700
25 45
124,00
2, 700
23, 600
0. 14
5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
757, 000
21, 500
21, 500
14, 400
417, 500
108, 000
124,00
2, 700
23, 600
23, 700
303, 200
37, 900
22, 800
37, 900
15, 200
75,00
90,00
22, 800
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 11 of 15
A- 42
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 12
LEVEE RAISE & SEEPAGE BERM @ DRYLAND LEVEE
STA 853+ 96 TO STA 908+ 60
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Traffic Control
4. AC Pavement Repairs
5. Clearing and Grubbing
6. Imported Engineered Fill
7. Drain Rock Material
8. Sand Filter Material
9. Filter Fabric
10. Class 2 Aggregate Base
11. Encroachment Modification
12. Hydroseeding
13. Quarry Stone Riprap
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Easement Acquisition
1 20, 000
50. 9
144, 300
51, 900
13, 000
481, 600
4, 100
1 1, 067, 300
7, 300
LS
SF
AC
TN
TN
TN
SF
TN
EA
SF
TN
3%
3%
65, 300
14 2, 700
25 45
45 0. 66
45 130, 60
0. 14
59 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
19. 4 AC $ 32, 700
5 EA $ 65, 300
8, 717, 600
246, 800
246, 800
65, 300
280, 00
137, 500
3, 607, 500
2, 335, 500
585, 000
317, 900
184, 500
130, 60
149, 500
430, 70
3, 487,00
435, 900
261, 600
435, 900
174, 400
871,00
1, 046, 200
261, 600
960,0
634, 400
326, 500
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 12 of 15
A- 43
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 13
EROSION REPAIRS
STA 0+0 TO STA 908+ 60
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Clearing and Grubbing
4. Quarry Stone Riprap
Mangement / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
Easement Ac• uisition
34. 0 AC
115, 600 TN
0. AC
0 EA
3%
3%
2, 700
59 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
7, 327, 000
207, 400
207, 400
91, 800
6, 820, 400
2, 931, 200
366, 400
219, 900
366, 400
146, 600
732,00
879, 300
219, 900
0 0
0 Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 13 of 15
A- 44
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 14
RIGHT- OF- WAYACQUISITION ( EXISTING DEFICIENCIES)
STA 0+0 TO STA 908+ 60
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation ( Agricultural)
2. Land Valuation ( Residential)
3. Land Valuation ( Commercial)
4. Improvement Valuation ( Residential)
5. Easement Acquisition
6. Easement Acquisition Oak Shores
40. 7 AC
3. 0 AC
1. 0 AC
15 EA
113 EA
1 EA
32, 700
326, 400
326, 400
195, 900
65, 300
522, 300
13, 476, 200
1, 330, 900
979, 200
326, 400
2, 938, 500
7, 378, 900
522, 300
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 14 of 15
A- 45
Print Date: 2/4/023
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA
URBAN FLOOD RISK REDUCTION PROJECT
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
2023 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total
PROJECT
ID 15
DRYLAND LEVEE EXTENSION
STA 908+ 60 TO STA 1030+ 53
Construction
1. Mobilization
2. Erosion Control
3. Traffic Control
4. AC Pavement Repairs
5. Clearing and Grubbing
6. Excavate Levee Keyway
7. Imported Engineered Fill
8. Drain Rock Material
9. Sand Filter Material
10. Filter Fabric
11. Class 2 Aggregate Base
12. Encroachment Removal
13. Encroachment Modification
14. Relocate Ditch
15. Hydroseeding
16. Quarry Stone Riprap
Management / Environmental / Engineering
1. Administration
2. Planning
3. Environmental and Permitting
4. Geotechnical Engineering
5. Surveying and Civil Engineering
6. Construction Management and Inspection
7. Mitigation
Real Estate
1. Land Valuation (Agricultural)
2. Easement Accjuisition
Project Totals
1 LS
70, 000 SF
80. AC
32, 600 CY
781, 600 TN
58, 100 TN
14, 600 TN
391, 700 SF
9, 300 TN
2 EA
3 EA
9, 100 LF
1, 761, 100 SF
22,00 TN
3%
3%
159, 400
14 6, 700
14 25
45 45
0. 66
45 66, 500
130, 60
14 0. 14
59 5%
3%
5%
2%
10%
12%
3%
32, 700
65, 300
29, 504, 900
835, 100
835, 100
159, 400
980, 00
541, 700
456,00
19, 540, 000
2, 614, 500
657, 000
258, 600
418, 500
133, 000
391, 800
127, 400
246, 600
1, 309, 800
11, 802, 200
1, 475, 300
885, 200
1, 475, 300
590, 10
2, 950, 500
3, 540, 600
885, 200
4, 140, 900
2, 704, 300
1, 436, 600
Kjeldsen, Sinnock & Neudeck, Inc. Page 15 of 15
A- 46
Print Date: 2/4/023
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX B:
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 22- 07:
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH THE MEMBER LAND USE
AGENCIES TO FINALIZE THE MOSSDALE TRACT URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD
PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UPDATE AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED COLLECTION AGREEMENT
EXCLUDING THE FINAL NEXUS STUDY UPDATE)
AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD
CONTROL AGENCY MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVEL OF
PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ( PARTIAL EXECUTION COPY)
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM SUPPORTING TABLES
Reso 22- 07 SJAFCA Resolution Adopting Regional Impact Fee Program 81 Agmt Amended Collection Agreement for Regional Impact Fee B3 Table B1 Development Fee Summary B20
Table B2 Total Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate B21 Table B3 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Single Family B22 Table B4 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate — Multifamily B23 Table B5 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate — Commercial B24 Table B6 Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate — Industrial B25 Table 137 Creditable Pre -Project Expenditures 826
LWA
LARSEN WURZEI
Associates. Inc.
1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2024 0903. docx
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. SJAFCA 22- 07
SAN JOAQUIN AREA
FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH THE MEMBER LAND USE
AGENCIES TO FINALIZE THE MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN
LEVEL OF FLOOD PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE UDPATE AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED
COLLECTION AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, in November 2018 the SJAFCA Board of Directors approved the Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee Program Impact Fee Program") Nexus Study and authorized the execution of a collection agreement for said program with its member land use agencies; and WHEREAS, since the approval of the Impact Fee Program Nexus Study, several key factors reflected in the Nexus have changed including changes to the overall costs of the levee improvement program, the approach to financing the improvements and projections of development upon which the Nexus Study apportions the cost necessitating and update to the Nexus Study and associated collection agreement; and WHEREAS, SJAFCA now desires to work with its member Land Use Agencies to implement an update to the Impact Fee Program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The SJAFCA Board of Directors hereby directs staff to work with the member Land Use Agencies to finalize for adoption by the member land use agencies the Draft Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Nexus Study Update Dated February 23, 2022 attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
2. The Development Fee will be collected by the Land Use Agencies in accordance with an Amended Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee. The Board authorizes the Executive Director, after consultation with Agency Counsel, to execute a collection agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March 2022.
SJAFCA Resolution 22- 07
B- 1
ATTACHMENT A
ATTEST:
CHRIS ELIAS, Secretary
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
APPROVED AS TO F
S • ' L.: ' ' O - • al Counsel
fe
Flood
Area
y
DAN WRIGHT, Chair
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
SJAFCA Resolution 22- 07
B- 2
Exhibit 2
AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVEL OF
FLOOD PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
This Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee (" Agreement") is made and entered into on the date it is effective pursuant to Section 12 by and among the following parties:
a. City of Stockton, hereinafter referred to as " Stockton"; b. County of San Joaquin, hereinafter referred to as " County"; c. City of Lathrop, hereinafter referred to as "Lathrop;" d. City of Manteca, hereinafter referred to as "Manteca;" and, e. The San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency, herein referred to as SJAFCA."
A signatory to this Agreement is referred to herein as a Party, and collectively each Party is referred to as the Parties.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, in January of 2018, Stockton, the County, the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (" SJCFCWCD"), Lathrop, and Manteca executed an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (" JEPA") to reform the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ("Agency") with a common goal of expanding the Agency to allow a coordinated effort to reduce flood risk in the Mossdale Tract Area ( the " Program").
ims3 vl
AMENDED Agreement for Collection ofSan Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 3
WHEREAS, SJAFCA, through certain state legislation and through the execution of the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, has legal authority to prescribe, revise and collect fees as a condition of development of land ( JEPA Section 7. m) for the purpose of assisting in the financing of flood control facilities, including the authority to make such fees applicable to development of land within the County, Stockton, Lathrop, and Manteca ( collectively, " the Land Use Agencies").
WHEREAS, SJAFCA exercised this authority for the purpose of assisting in the financing of levee improvements and related flood risk reduction measures necessary to provide at least a 200 -year level of flood protection to lands within the 200 -year floodplain along the San Joaquin River in the Mossdale Tract Area (" Program Area") and to thereby offset the increase in damageable property that is placed in the levee protected floodplain as new development occurs in this area.
WHEREAS, SJAFCA prepared a Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (" Nexus Study") dated November 8, 2018 that described and determined the applicable Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Development Impact Fee (" DIF").
WHEREAS, SJAFCA has now prepared an updated Nexus Study, dated February 23, 2022, that again describes and determines an updated DIF.
WHEREAS, each of the Parties has adopted or will adopt the updated Nexus Study which creates an updated DIF for the Program Area.
WHEREAS, SJAFCA has requested that the Land Use Agencies, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for new development in the Program Area, as shown on Figure 1 in the Nexus Study, that is within each of the Land Use Agency' sland use authority, collect and transmit to SJAFCA the updated DIF for the development project for which such building permit is to be issued.
WHEREAS, the Land Use Agencies are willing and desire to collect the DIF and to transmit the DIF to SJAFCA, and the Land Use Agencies and SJAFCA desire to set forth the standards applicable to the collection of the DIF. 17775380
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Contiol Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 4
COVENANTS
In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated in this Agreement by reference.
2. Collection and Transmission of DIF. Commencing with the effective date of the updated DIF, the Land Use Agencies shall collect the updated DIF as a condition of issuance of a building permit for any building, for which a building permit is required, located in the Program Area. The Land Use Agencies shall transmit to SJAFCA all amounts of the DIF that have been collected, minus the hold -back processing fee for the Land Use Agencies adopted pursuant to the Nexus Study. The methodology for computing the DIF, together with other procedural criteria, are specified in the Nexus Study.
3. Deposit of DIF. SJAFCA shall maintain a separate capital facilities account into which the Land Use Agencies shall, at least quarterly, deposit the DIF funds collected by the Land Use Agencies. Any interest earned on the DIF while held by the Land Use Agency shall also be deposited by the Land Use Agency.
4. Periodic Update of the DIF. SJAFCA shall promptly notify the Land Use Agencies of any necessary adjustments to the DIF to be made by the Parties from time to time.
5. Application of Fee Crediting and Reimbursement Policies. The Parties agree that in order to have a fair application of this Agreement, the DIF and the funds it will generate within each Land Use Agency, it is necessary to agree to principles which will be applied by any Land Use Agency when certain conditions occur. In such cases, the Land Use Agencies agree to apply the principles contained in Exhibit B to Collection Agreement. The relevant conditions are as follows:
imssavI
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 5
a. The Land Use Agency has previously collected funds pursuant to a funding agreement with a developer in advance of when the fee would otherwise be due pursuant to the DIF Resolution and the funds are to be used to plan, design, and/ or construct a portion of the Program; or,
b. The Land Use Agency has entered into an agreement with a developer to plan, design and/ or construction a portion of the Program; or,
c. The Land Use Agency itself has funded the planning, design and/ or construction a portion of the Program.
6. Refunds. In the event that a Land Use Agency collects the DIF or a portion of the DIF in error, the Land Use Agency will recalculate the correct DIF amount, process a refund to the customer, if necessary, and notify SJAFCA of this action.
SJAFCA shall promptly refund any amount due to the Land Use Agency as a result of such error, or upon request of the Land Use Agency shall work with the Land Use Agency to true -up amounts owing in conjunction with the Land Use Agency forwarding future DIFs. In the event that a Land Use Agency requests that SJAFCA process a refund due to a building permit expiring without construction taking place, SJAFCA shall promptly process such refund to the Land Use Agency minus any costs incurred by SJAFCA in processing such refund.
7. Payment of DIF under Protest. Pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 9 of the California Government Code, commencing with § 66020, any aggrieved landowner shall be entitled to pay the applicable DIF to a Land Use Agency under protest. The protest procedures set forth therein shall apply to the DIF paid under protest.
8. Appeal. SJAFCA' sBoard of Directors shall hear all appeals for waiver or reduction in SJAFCA' sDIF. The Board of Directors may adopt such policies as it wishes for the processing of the appeal and shall have the sole authority to grant or deny the 17775380
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin AreaFlood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 6
appeal. Within 5 business days following the final action of its Board of Directors regarding an appeal, SJAFCA shall notify the affected Land Use Agency in writing of its determination.
9. Compensation of Land Use Agencies. In consideration for collecting the DIF and consistent with the hold -back provided for in Section 2, SJAFCA shall reimburse the Land Use Agencies for their cost of time and materials for calculating, reporting, collecting, and processing functions. Such costs shall include the time and materials expended by, but not limited to, employees of the relevant Community Services Department, the Auditor -Controller' sdepartment, the Land Use Agencies' administrative office, and the information technology department. The Parties agree that a charge of 3% of the DIF is a reasonable estimate of the Land Use Agencies' cost of time and materials for calculating, reporting, collecting, and processing of the DIF.
Each Land Use Agency and SJAFCA may agree to a different amount that reflects the Land Use Agency' sactual cost of collection by executing a letter agreement without the need to amend this Agreement.
10. Relationship to Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District.
The Parties acknowledge that as a separate action, the Land Use Agencies are also collaborating on the creation of an enhanced infrastructure financing district (" EIFD") which will collect funds from a portion of property taxes paid in the Program Area to also fund, in addition to the DIF, levee improvements protecting the Program Area. For the EIFD, the Land Use Agencies have agreed that the County will contribute a larger share of EIFD payments for an initial period, in exchange for the County receiving priority repayment of some of those funds from the DIF collected under this Agreement.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A are the key terms showing the mechanism of such priority repayment and each of the Land Use Entities agrees to such priority repayment.
11. Indemnification.
a. Except as provided in Section 11. b., SJAFCA agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Land Use Agencies, their Board of Supervisors or City I777538v!
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 7
Council, officers, directors, agents and employees from and against any and all demands, liabilities, claims, actions, costs, damages, losses, litigation or expenses including attorney' sfees) arising out of or in any way related to, directly or indirectly, any action taken by the Land Use Agencies to collect the DIF and/ ortheir performance of the obligations of this Agreement. This indemnification shall extend and apply to any claim, demand, or litigation pertaining to the lawfulness or validity of the SJAFCA DIF. b. Each Land Use Agency agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend SJAFCA, its Board of Director, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all demands, liabilities, claims, actions, costs, damages, losses, litigation or expenses ( including attorney' sfees) arising out of or in any way related to, directly or indirectly, any criminal, reckless, or wrongful action taken by the Land Use Agency or its employees in the collection or processing of the DIF.
12. Notices. Notice to be provided to any Party to this Agreement arising out of matters pertaining to this Agreement shall be addressed as follows:
For County and SJCFCWCD:
San Joaquin County Department of Public Works
ATTN: Public Works Director
P. O. Box 1810
Stockton, California 95201
For City of Lathrop:
City of Lathrop
ATTN: Teresa Vargas, City Clerk
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
For City of Manteca:
City of Manteca
ATTN: City Clerk
1771538v1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 8
1001 W. Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
For City of Stockton:
City of Stockton Community Development Department
ATTN: Community Development Director
424 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Any party may change the address to which subsequent notice and/ or other communications can be sent by giving written notice designating a change of address to the other Parties, which shall be effective upon receipt.
13. Term. This Agreement shall be effective as to SJAFCA and any Land Use Agency, once SJAFCA and the Land Use Agency both execute this Agreement and also adopt the DIF, and shall be effective as to each additional Land Use Agency once this Agreement is executed by that Land Use Agency and the DIF is adopted, and shall end when either (1) SJAFCA terminates the Agreement in accordance with Section 14, or (ii) all adopting Land Use Agencies have terminated the Agreement in accordance with Section 14.
14. Withdrawal from Agreement. Any Land Use Agency that has executed this Agreement, or SJAFCA, may withdraw from this Agreement by giving the other Parties at least six (6) months written notice of withdrawal. In the event of withdrawal by a Land Use Agency, that Land Use Agency shall, within 10 days of effective withdrawal, cause to be deposited into SJAFCA' s
separate capital facilities account all DIF funds collected prior to withdrawal.
15. Modifications. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties and no alteration, amendment, variation, or waiver of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by all Parties. Waiver by any Party of any default, breach or condition precedent shall not be construed as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent, or any other right hereunder. 177753Bv1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
Page7of13
B- 9
16. Governing Laws and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed and to be performed within the State of California and shall be construed and governed by the internal laws of the State of California. Any legal proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement shalt be brought in the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, California.
17. Assignment; Binding on Successors. The rights and duties of the Parties may not be assigned or delegated without the written consent of all other Parties. Any attempt to assign or delegate such rights or duties in contravention of this Agreement shall be null and void. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the Parties hereto, respectively. Any approved assignment or delegation shall be consistent with the terms of any contracts, resolutions, indemnities and other obligations of the Agency then in effect.
18. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been prepared equally by all of the Parties, and the Agreement and its individual provisions shall not be construed or interpreted more favorably for one Party on the basis that another Party prepared it.
19. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire contract between the Parties regarding the collection, deposit, and reporting of the DIF. Any prior agreements, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby terminated effective immediately upon full execution of this Agreement.
20. Severability. Should any part, term or provision of this Agreement be decided by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby.
21. Duplicate Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts. The Agreement shall be deemed executed when it has been signed by SJAFCA and at least one of the Land Use Agencies.
117153 v1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 10
22. Interpretation. For purposes of this Agreement, references to " he" shall mean and include " she," references to " him" shall mean and include " her," and references to " his" shall mean and include " hers."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above -written.
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
a political subdivision of the State of California a municipal Corporation
CITY OF STOCKTON,
er6me Wilverding
C unty Administraror
By:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of San Joaquin,
State of California
Clerk of the City of Stockton
By: By:
RACHEL DeBORD
Deputy Clerk
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: l '1 `' _ By:
FRI` 1Z BOCHMAN, C. E. T. E., CFM
Interim Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: '
Matthew Dacey
Deputy County Counsel
1771533v1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection ofSan Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 11
CHRIS ELIAS
Executive Director
CITY OF LATHROP, CITY OF MANTECA,
a municipal Corporation a municipal Corporation
By:
en 7. Salvatore
City Manager Title:
ATIEST: ATTEST:
Clerk of the City of Lathrop Clerk of the City of Manteca By: Lut By:
ee
resa Vargas
lty Clerk Title:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: S - By:
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney Title:
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL APPROVED AS TO FORM:
AGENCY
By:
SCOTT L. SHAPIRO
Agency Counsel
177153110
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
Page lO of 13
B- 12
CITY OF LATHROP, CITY OF MANTECA,
a municipal Corporation
By: By:
Title: INI C.r"
a municipal Corporation
ATTEST;
Clerk ofthe City of Lathrop
By: By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: By:
Title: Title:
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL
AGENCY
ATTEST:
Clerk of the. City of Manteca
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: By:
CHRIS ELIAS SCOTT L. SHAPIRO
Executive Director Agency Counsel
177133tvl
AMENDED Agreement for Collection ofSan Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 13
EXHIBIT A
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVEL OF
FLOOD PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Key Terms Related to the Repayment of
EIFD Payments to Land Use Entities from Impact Fees
1. Development Impact Fees " Impact Fees" collected after the Initial Years (ending in 2029), would be paid to each jurisdiction to help offset the general fund impacts associated with debt service requirements of the EIFD, subject first to priority reimbursement of "County Additional EIFD Contributions," as defined below. ( Le., the Impact Fees would be directly paid to the County until they have fully repaid the cumulative County Additional EIFD Contributions. After that repayment, Impact Fees would be used to offset the agencies' impacts to their respective general funds from prior EIFD property tax allocations, the "Impact Fee Offset," as further described below).
2. During the Initial Years, the following EIFD funding participation is proposed:
a) San Joaquin County proposed to contribute a total flat rate of 47% of property tax increment, comprised of its initial Base Rate plus an additional 37% of property tax increment, with such additional amount defined as "County Additional EIFD Contribution".
b) Cities will each provide their respective Initial Base Rates.
3. Following the Initial Years, the following EIFD Funding participation and other financial arrangements are proposed:
a) The Initial Base Rates would no longer apply and all agencies, including the County, would provide proportional EIFD contributions ( i.e., the same percentage rate of total tax increment) to meet the debt service needs of any debt issued and secured by EIFD revenues subject to the Maximum Rate 20%) of total property tax increment. The contributions provided after the Initial Years would be subject to the Maximum Rate are defined as the " Post Project Annual Contribution."
b) The cumulative County Additional EIFD Contribution shall be repaid to the County using Impact Fees. County to receive 100% of Impact Fees until the cumulative Additional County EIFD Contribution is repaid with interest compounded quarterly on at the annual County Pooled Treasury Rate for that quarter plus 200 basis points.
1777538v1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 14
c) Following retirement of the cumulative County Additional EIFD Contribution with interest from Impact Fees, the Impact Fee Offset would be implemented as follows. All Impact Fees received by SJAFCA after repayment to the County would be allocated and paid to the Cities and the County to offset prior general fund impacts of previous EIFD contributions. The proportionate share of the cumulative total of each participating agency' sInitial Contributions and Post Project Annual Contributions are defined as each agency' s "Base EIFD Share." DIF revenues would be paid to each Agency based on its Base EIFD Share.
d) The duration ( i.e., term) of Impact Fee Offset payments is yet to be determined. The term will be finalized during the process of updating the SJAFCA Mossdale ULOP Program Impact Fee Nexus Study. As part of the Impact Fee Update process, the Member Agencies will have an opportunity to weigh in on duration of the impact fee program.
ims; av1
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 15
EXHIBIT B
FEE CREDITING PRINCIPLES
17773380
AMENDED Agreement for Collection of San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Development Impact Fee
B- 16
EXHIBIT B
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
MOSSDALE TRACT AREA REGIONAL URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD PROTECTION ElEI= 1 M PA- Cr PEAERE D IT -8t RE[' MB- U' RSEM ENT POEIC- iES
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS
The following are the underlying assumptions that predicate the establishment of credits and reimbursements:
All funding, in -kind services, or construction of facilities in furtherance of providing an Urban Level of Flood Protection to Mossdale Tract Area, "Prior Advance Funding," was provided in advance of the Reclamation District 17 Interim Levee impact Fee ( Interim Levee Fee) and San Joaquin Area Hood Control Agency (SJAFCA) Regional Levee Fee ( Regional DiF) (collectively, the Levee Fee) on behalf of development projects will be identified by the tables in a " Credit & Reimbursement Analysis," to be prepared by SJAFCA.
All Prior Advance Funding of the Levee Fee will be proportionately allocable to the individual tract maps/ phases/ units/ villages in projects based upon a project' sgross developable acreage.
Development within a project is assumed to have an obligation to fund levee improvements for alt undeveloped gross developable acreage as of April 7, 2017 in Lathrop and April 22, 2017 In Manteca, the effective dates of the Interim Fees adopted by Lathrop and Manteca.
Units within a project are assumed to have been previously absorbed if a permit for the unit has been applied for before January 8, 2019, the effective date ofSJAFCA' sRegional DIF.
The Levee Fee obligation for all remaining developable acreage in a project absorbed before January 8, 2019 are the Initial Fee Rates as identified in the November 8, 2018, Mossdale Tract Area Regional Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee Nexus Study as adopted by SJAFCA Resolution - 18 on November 8, 2018 ( reference Table 1 of that Nexus Study).
The credit for Prior Advance Funding will be expressed in terms of GDAs and will be determined by taking the amount of prior advance funding and dividing it by the Initial Fee Rates per GDA. The amount of GDA credit will be set by this methodology and will not be recalculated in the future by the escalating fee rate.
Ail permits that have previously been applied for before January 8, 2019, (i.e., absorbed) are assumed to have been fully funded with credit from prior advance funding and no additional Levee Fees will be required to be paid for these units.
For multiple projects that are being developed by a common landowner, if one project is determined to have advance funded Levee Fees in excess of its obligation and is due a reimbursement, the reimbursement will be applied and added to the credit of the next project currently underway with the consent of the landowner.
Prcpore, iby[ WA 1
October 22, 2018
B- 17
CREDITING POLICY FOR PRIOR ADVANCE FUNDING
The Crediting Policy will allow for the/ use of the accumulated credit on a proportionate basis as the remainder of a project is developed. The basis for the proportionality will be the ratio of Remaining Credit Acreage to Total Remaining Acres to be developed.
Remaining Credit Acreage" will be defined as the credit accumulated by the prior advance funding less the amount of credit utilized by units that have been absorbed prior to January 8, 2019.
Total Remaining Acres" to be developed will be defined as the difference between the total developable GDAs in a project and the amount of acres absorbed before January 9, 2019, or as subsequently revised by the Land Use Agency and the Landowner.
Use of Prior Advance Funding Credit
As homes andfor projects are constructed by permits applied for after January 9, 2019, the landowner will fund a portion of the Levee Fee based on the relative proportionality between the remainder of a project not able to be funded from the Remaining Credit Acreage and the Total Remaining Acres left in the project after all previously absorbed units.
To irriplement this policy, the Land Use Agency will calculate this remaining amount of the Levee Fee due as the individual building permits are issued for units to be constructed in the project. Collection of the Levee Fee can be deferred consistent with any adopted fee deferral program by the Land Use agency.
CREDITING POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
Any Developer constructed facilities will be constructed pursuant to an agreement entered into between the Land Use Agency and SJAFCA. The agreement will specify the maximum amount of credit that will be afforded for the construction of the facility which will be the lesser of the estimated cost of the facility which was the basis for the development fee program or the Developer' sactual construction cost (" Constructed Facilities Funding Credit"). Constructed Facilities Funding Credit will be documented and provided when a completed facility is accepted by the appropriate entity.
Use of Constructed Facilities Funding Credit
Use of Constructed Facilities Funding Credit will be consistent with the " Use of Advance Funding Credit" described above.
REIMBURSEMENT POLICY FOR PRIOR ADVANCE FUNDING
For Development Projects due a reimbursement as a result of funding in excess of a Project' sLevee impact Fee Obligation
The reimbursement policy will be consistent with the following underlying principles.
Reimbursements will be only be pald from levee impact fees collected from other development projects.
No reimbursements should be paid to a party advancing funds into the levee improvement program until all levee improvement project costs are paid and the levee improvementprogramhas been completed and certified, unless otherwise determined by SJAFCA that payment of such reimbursements is financially feasible and legally defensible by SJAFCA.
Prepares/ by INA 2 (. lobar -22, 2098
B- 18
The Board should make decisions that consider the impact to the Project and the services provided to SJAFCA. beneficiaries at large.
The Board should make decisions that consider the proportionality of the investment made Into the levee improvement program.
Fh@Board- shod- consider: xhe_ timing of_ cepaymen: t.of_ capital_ toxhose- investingan thelevee improvement program.
For Land Use Agencies due a reimbursement as a result of funding provided to advance the Levee Improvement Program in advance of January 1, 2018
The reimbursement policy will be consistent with the following underlying principles.
No reimbursements should he paid from development fees to a land use agency that advanced funds into the levee improvement program until all levee improvement project costs are paid and the levee improvement program has been completed and certified, unless otherwise determined by SJAFCA that payment of such reimbursements is financially feasible and legally defensible by SJAFCA.
The Board should make decisions that consider the impact to the Protect and the services provided to SJAFCA beneficiaries at large.
The Board should make decisions that consider the proportionality of the investment made into the levee improvement program.
The Board should consider the timing of repayment of capital to those investing in the levee improvement program.
For Land Use Agencies due repayment pursuant to the Interim Seed Money Funding Agreement dated June 12, 2018
Repayment will be made consistent with Section 6 of that Agreement.
Piepared1y LWA 3 October 22, 2018
Table B- 1
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Initial Starting Development Fee Rate Summary
Fee Rate Summary ( Current Adopted)
Land Use
Reference
Demonstrative Purposes Only
Units / 1, 000 Fee Rate per
Cost Share Administrative Fee Rate Building Sq Ft Unit/ 1, 000 Per Acre Fee Per Acre Per Acre Building Sq Ft
1] 3% ( 2]
Single -Family $ 21, 462 $ 644 $ 22, 106 5. 86 $ 3, 770 Multifamily $ 2Q084 $ 603 $ 20, 686 18. 89 $ 1, 095
Commercial $ 20, 307 $ 609 $ 20, 916 12. 21 $ 1, 713
A $ 15, 907 $ 477 $ 16, 384 15. 55 $ 1, 053
1] Regional Development Impact Fee Rates for FY 22/3.
2] Single -Family and Multifamily shown in units; Commercial and Industrial shown in 1, 000' s of square feet. 3] The Development Impact Fee will escalate annually based on the Engineering News Record' s Construction Cost Index 20 -City Average ( ENR CCI) for the most recent December bears to the December 2018 index.
Prepared by LWA B1 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. x/ sx Table B- 2
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Total Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate
Revenue by Land Use
Year
Increase
Single Family Multifamily Commercial Industrial Factor [ 1] Total Fee Revenue 0% [ 1]
Table 8-3 Table 8-4 Table 8-5 Table 8-6
2016 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 0
2017 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 0
2018 [ 2] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 826, 986
2019 [ 3] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 1, 888, 567
2020 [ 4] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 1, 368,91
2021 [ 5] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 4, 829, 607
2022 [ 6] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 2, 412, 968
2023 [ 7] N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $ 3, 199, 872
2024 $ 1, 737, 125 $ 273, 360 $ 1, 299, 368 $ 2, 172, 033 1. 00 $ 5, 481, 886 2025 $ 2, 137,02 $ 324,79 $ 1, 459, 618 $ 2,75, 118 1. 00 $ 6, 196, 217 2026 $ 2, 011, 305 $ 400, 134 $ 1, 451,22 $ 1, 502, 223 1. 00 $ 5, 365, 085 2027 $ 1, 525, 344 $ 328,53 $ 1, 545, 733 $ 1,79, 264 1. 00 $ 4, 578, 694 2028 $ 1, 467, 708 $ 48, 118 $ 1, 524, 633 $ 1, 202, 462 1. 00 $ 4, 242, 921 2029 $ 1, 497, 545 $ 48, 854 $ 1, 651,31 $ 814, 677 1. 00 $ 4, 012, 708 2030 $ 1, 566, 448 $ 44, 295 $ 1, 933, 809 $ 482, 013 1. 00 $ 4, 026, 565 2031 $ 1, 597, 777 $ 45, 181 $ 1, 816, 144 $ 491, 654 1. 00 $ 3, 950, 755 2032 $ 1, 629, 476 $ 142, 093 $ 1, 095, 718 $ 501, 487 1. 00 $ 3,68, 773 2033 $ 1, 252, 109 $ 97,29 $ 1, 262, 442 $ 1, 516, 322 1. 00 $ 4, 128, 801 2034 $ 1, 275, 550 $ 99, 887 $ 1, 287, 918 $ 1, 491, 863 1. 00 $ 4, 155, 218 2035 $ 734, 092 $ 101, 885 $ 1, 249,66 $ 1, 449, 680 1. 00 $ 3, 534, 924 2036 $ 515, 285 $ 103, 923 $ 1,73, 957 $ 1, 479, 291 1. 00 $ 3, 272, 456 2037 $ 525,91 $ 106, 001 $ 844, 287 $ 1, 029, 852 1. 00 $ 2, 505, 732 2038 $ 536, 103 $ 44, 600 $ 662, 756 $ 432, 665 1. 00 $ 1, 676, 124 2039 $ 546, 825 $ 0 $ 675, 091 $ 441, 38 1. 00 $ 1, 663, 235 2040 $ 2, 165, 626 $ 0 $ 391, 540 $ 450, 145 1. 00 $ 3, 007, 311 2041 $ 1, 727, 689 $ 0 $ 426, 315 $ 459, 148 1. 00 $ 2, 613, 151 2042 $ 1, 762, 243 $ 0 $ 434, 81 $ 468, 331 1. 00 $ 2, 665, 414 2043 $ 1, 797, 487 $ 0 $ 453,96 $ 476, 752 1. 00 $ 2, 727,35 2044 $ 1, 833, 437 $ 0 $ 393, 622 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2,27, 060 2045 $ 1, 870, 106 $ 0 $ 401,95 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2,71, 601
2046 $ 1, 907, 508 $ 0 $ 409, 525 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2, 317, 033 2047 $ 1, 945, 658 $ 0 $ 388, 646 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2, 334,04 2048 $ 1, 984, 571 $ 0 $ 362, 437 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2, 347, 009 2049 $ 2, 024, 263 $ 0 $ 369, 686 $ 0 1. 00 $ 2, 393, 949 Total 39, 573, 974 $ 2,08, 992 $ 24, 965, 395 $ 20, 316, 299 $ 101, 591, 052 1] Total projected fee revenue assumes a 2% escalation in the ENR Index. 2] Total revenues received January 2018 through December 2018. Amounts include interest for the program. 3] Total revenues received January 2019 through December 2019. Amounts include interest for the program. 4] Total revenues received January 2020 through December 2020. Amounts include interest for the program. 5] Total revenues received January 2021 through December 2021. Amounts include interest for the program. 6] Total revenues received January 2022 through November 2022. Amounts include interest for the program. 7] Reflects an imputed amount based on the total revenues received through July 2024 less the above noted amounts.
Prepared by LWA 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 21
Table B- 3
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Single Family Single Family Acres By Jurisdiction [ 1]
Unincorp Base
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table 8-1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 21, 462
2016 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2017 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2018 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2019 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2020 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2021 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2022 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2023 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2024 0. 52. 4 11. 3 15. 7 79. 4 $ 1, 737, 125
2025 3. 76. 8 0. 15. 7 95. 7 $ 2, 137,02
2026 3. 69. 4 0. 15. 7 88. 3 $ 2, 011, 305
2027 3. 46. 7 0. 15. 7 65. 7 $ 1, 525, 344
2028 3. 43. 0 0. 15. 7 61. 9 $ 1, 467, 708
2029 3. 43. 0 0. 15. 7 62. 0 $ 1, 497, 545
2030 3. 44. 6 0. 15. 7 63. 5 $ 1, 566, 448
2031 3. 44. 6 0. 15. 7 63. 5 $ 1, 597, 777
2032 3. 44. 6 0. 15. 7 63. 5 $ 1, 629, 476
2033 3. 44. 6 0. 0. 47. 9 $ 1, 252, 109
2034 3. 2 44. 6 0. 0. 47. 8 $ 1, 275, 550
2035 0. 27. 0 0. 0. 27. 0 $ 734, 092
2036 0. 18. 6 0. 0. 18. 6 $ 515, 285
2037 0. 18. 6 0. 0. 18. 6 $ 525,91
2038 0. 18. 6 0. 0. 18. 6 $ 536, 103
2039 0. 18. 6 0. 0. 18. 6 $ 546, 825
2040 56. 4 15. 7 0. 0. 72. 1 $ 2, 165, 626
2041 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 727, 689
2042 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 762, 243
2043 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 797, 487
2044 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 833, 437
2045 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 870, 106
2046 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 907, 508
2047 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 945, 658
2048 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 1, 984, 571
2049 56. 4 0. 0. 0. 56. 4 $ 2, 024, 263
Total 596. 3 671. 1 11. 3 141. 1, 419. 7 $39, 573, 974
1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres ( ac) Prepared by LWA B3 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 22
Table B- 4
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Multifamily
Multifamily Acres By Jurisdiction 111
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table B- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 20, 084
2016 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2017 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2018 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2019 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2020 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2021 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2022 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2023 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2024 5. 4 7. 9 0. 0. 13. 3 $ 273, 360
2025 5. 4 10. 0. 0. 15. 5 $ 324,79
2026 5. 4 5. 8 7. 5 0. 18. 8 $ 400, 134
2027 5. 4 2. 7. 5 0. 15. $ 328,53
2028 0. 2. 0. 0. 2. $ 48, 118
2029 0. 2. 0. 0. 2. $ 48, 854
2030 1. 9 0. 0. 0. 1. 9 $ 44, 295
2031 1. 9 0. 0. 0. 1. 9 $ 45, 181
2032 1. 9 0. 4. 0 0. 5. 9 $ 142, 093
2033 0. 0. 4. 0 0. 4. 0 $ 97,29
2034 0. 0. 4. 0 0. 4. 0 $ 99, 887
2035 0. 0. 4. 0 0. 4. 0 $ 101, 885
2036 0. 0. 4. 0 0. 4. 0 $ 103, 923
2037 0. 0. 4. 0 0. 4. 0 $ 106, 001
2038 0. 0. 1. 7 0. 1. 7 $ 44, 600
2039 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2040 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2041 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2042 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2043 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2044 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2045 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2046 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2047 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2048 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2049 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
Total 27. 5 30. 40. 7 0. 98. 5 $ 2,08, 992
1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres ( ac) Prepared by LWA B4 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 23
Table B- 5
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Commercial
Commercial Acres By Jurisdiction [ 1]
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table B- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 20, 307
2016 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2017 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2018 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2019 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2020 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2021 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2022 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2023 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2024 40. 1 16. 5 2. 3 3. 8 62. 7 $ 1, 299, 368
2025 40. 1 20. 3 2. 3 6. 3 69. 1 $ 1, 459, 618
2026 38. 4 20. 3 2. 3 6. 3 67. 4 $ 1, 451,22
2027 38. 4 21. 4 2. 3 8. 3 70. 3 $ 1, 545, 733
2028 38. 4 19. 2. 3 8. 3 68. 0 $ 1, 524, 633
2029 38. 4 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 72. 2 $ 1, 651,31
2030 49. 1 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 82. 9 $ 1, 933, 809
2031 42. 5 23. 3 2. 3 8. 3 76. 3 $ 1, 816, 144
2032 12. 4 22. 2. 3 8. 3 45. 2 $ 1, 095, 718
2033 12. 4 22. 2. 3 14. 51. 0 $ 1, 262, 442
2034 12. 4 22. 2. 3 14. 51. 0 $ 1, 287, 918
2035 12. 4 22. 2. 3 11. 6 48. 5 $ 1, 249,66
2036 12. 4 18. 4 2. 3 11. 6 44. 7 $ 1,73, 957
2037 12. 4 5. 2 2. 3 11. 6 31. 5 $ 844, 287
2038 12. 4 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 24. 3 $ 662, 756
2039 12. 4 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 24. $ 675, 091
2040 0. 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 13. 8 $ 391, 540
2041 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 14. 7 $ 426, 315
2042 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 7. 6 14. 7 $ 434, 81
2043 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 8. 0 15. 0 $ 453,96
2044 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 $ 393, 622
2045 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 $ 401,95
2046 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 5. 7 12. 8 $ 409, 525
2047 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 4. 8 11. 9 $ 388, 646
2048 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 3. 8 10. 9 $ 362, 437
2049 0. 9 3. 8 2. 3 3. 8 10. 9 $ 369, 686
Total 432. 9 325. 8 59. 8 201. 0 1, 019. 5 $24, 965, 395 1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres (ac) Prepared by LWA B5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 24
Table B- 6
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated Regional Development Fee Revenue Analysis
Development Impact Fee Revenue Estimate - Industrial
Industrial Acres By Jurisdiction
Unincorp
Year Lathrop Manteca Stockton County Total Fee Revenue
Table B- 1
Initial Fee Rate/ Acre $ 15, 907
2016 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2017 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2018 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2019 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2020 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2021 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2022 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2023 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2024 64. 3 69. 0. 0. 133. 9 $ 2, 172, 033
2025 64. 3 73. 2 0. 0. 137. 5 $ 2,75, 118
2026 64. 3 24. 7 0. 0. 89. 0 $ 1, 502, 223
2027 64. 9 3. 6 0. 0. 68. 5 $ 1,79, 264
2028 64. 9 3. 6 0. 0. 68. 5 $ 1, 202, 462
2029 41. 9 3. 6 0. 0. 45. 5 $ 814, 677
2030 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0. 26. 4 $ 482, 013
2031 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0. 26. 4 $ 491, 654
2032 22. 8 3. 6 0. 0. 26. 4 $ 501, 487
2033 22. 8 3. 6 23. 0 28. 9 78. 2 $ 1, 516, 322
2034 22. 8 3. 6 20. 28. 9 75. 4 $ 1, 491, 863
2035 22. 8 0. 20. 28. 9 71. 9 $ 1, 449, 680
2036 22. 8 0. 20. 28. 9 71. 9 $ 1, 479, 291
2037 0. 0. 20. 28. 9 49. 1 $ 1, 029, 852
2038 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 432, 665
2039 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 441, 38
2040 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 450, 145
2041 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 459, 148
2042 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 468, 331
2043 0. 0. 20. 0. 20. $ 476, 752
2044 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2045 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2046 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2047 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2048 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
2049 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. $ 0
Total 524. 1 196. 2 225. 0 144. 3 1, 089. 6 $20, 316, 299 1] Source: Updated Development Absorption Projections dated July 16, 2021 Table 2, SJAFCA Mossdale Tract Area, Development Absorption Projections Acres ( ac) Prepared by LWA B6 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 25
Table B7
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Creditable Pre -Project Expenditures
Pre -Project Expenditure - Contractor (Amendment/ Task Order; Cost Funding Source Amount Peterson Brustad - Agreement No. 1
Funding 11/ 2014 Staff Repot-,
123, 244 Manteca
River Islands
Saybrook CLSP
Richland
Lathrop Gateway/ Lazares
Saybrook CLSP
5123, 244
61,22
15, 500
13, 020
14, 415
3, 720
14, 967
Peterson Brustad Agreement No. 2
Peterson Brustad - Agreement No. 3
7, 500 Lathrop
7, 500
17, 499 Lathrop
517, 499
123, 244
7, 500
57,00
17, 499
517, 499
Peterson Brustad Agreement No. 4 50, 000 Saybrook CLSP
Lathrop
50, 000
25, 000
25, 000
50, 000
Peterson Brustad - Agreement No. 5 2, 589, 197 Manteca
Lathrop
Saybrook CLSP
Others
52,89, 197
863, 066
750, 00
500, 00
476, 131
Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc. - Agreement No. 1 ( A) Financial Planning / Grant Applicatioi
Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc. - Agreement No. 1 ( B) Financial Plan for ULOF
Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc. - Agreement No. 3
Financial Plan Implementation & Analysi
Task Order No. 1
Task Order No. 2
SJAFCA Seed Funding Agreement Loans & Interest in Funds 63, 540 Lathrop
Mantenca
63, 540
80, 010 Lathrop
Mantenca
80, 010
172, 018 Lathrop
Manteca
126, 300 RD 17
5298, 318
313,51 Lathrop
Manteca
Stockton
SJ County
Interest (Use of Money)
5313, 351
52,89, 197
42, 360
21, 180
63, 540
53, 340
26, 670
80, 010
114, 679
57, 339
126, 300
5298, 318
115, 000
65, 000
65, 000
65, 000
3,51
5313, 351
Total Cost / Sources 3, 542, 659 Lathrop
Lathrop Gateway/ Lazares
Manteca
Stockton
SJ County
Others
Richland
River Islands
Saybrook CLSP
RD 17
3, 542, 659
1,26, 621
3, 720
1, 095, 580
65, 703
65, 703
476, 131
14, 415
15, 500
552, 987
126, 300
3, 542, 659
Source: City of Lathrop, LWA
Prepared by LWA 7 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx B- 26
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX C:
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 24-2:
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD
CONTROL AGENCY APPROVING FINAL ENGINEER' SREPORT, FORMING THE
MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ORDERING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2024-5
Reso 24-2 SJAFCA Mossdale OAD Resolution of Formation C- 1 LWA
LARSEN WURZEI
Associates. Inc. 1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2024 0903. docx ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. SJAFCA 24-2
SAN JOAQUIN AREA
FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD
CONTROL AGENCY APPROVING FINAL ENGINEER' SREPORT, FORMING THE
MOSSDALE TRACT OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2024-5
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( the " Agency") is a joint powers agency that was created in May 1995 between the City of Stockton (" Stockton"), San Joaquin County (" County") and the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SJCFCWCD"), for the purpose of providing flood protection services for the City of Stockton and surrounding unincorporated areas of the County;
WHEREAS, in January of 2018 Stockton, the County, the SJCFCWCD, the City of Lathrop Lathrop"), and the City of Manteca (" Manteca") executed an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement to reform the Agency by adding Lathrop and Manteca as members;
WHEREAS, in February 2018, SJAFCA, as part of the reformulation of the Agency' sJoint Exercise of Powers Agreement to include the Cities of Lathrop and Manteca as members of the Agency, assumed the role of Local Flood Management Agency (" LFMA") as part of the efforts to provide Urban Level of Flood Protection to the area that includes the community of Weston Ranch in south Stockton, south to the City of Lathrop and west to the western portions of the City of Manteca commonly referred to as the " Mossdale Tract Area." In its role as LFMA, SJAFCA has advanced a funding program to generate the funds needed to implement improvements to the levee system protecting the Mossdale Tract Area (" the Project") to ensure the levees can meet Urban Levee Design Criteria (" ULDC") and the Area can achieve an Urban Level of Flood Protection (" ULOP");
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2018, in its role as LFMA, the Agency transmitted its first Annual Report of Adequate Progress toward Urban Level of Flood Protection to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board pursuant to Government Code § 65007 ( a)( 5). The Annual Adequate Progress Report includes the details of a
funding and financing plan to generate the needed local funding for the Project. The Annual Adequate Progress Report identified three new funding mechanisms to generate the local funding; a Regional Development Impact Fee program; an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District; and the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District (" Mossdale Tract OAD");
WHEREAS, in September 2019, the Agency entered into a contract with Willdan Financial Services to provide Assessment Engineering Services for the proposed Mossdale Tract OAD to provide a portion of the funding for ULOP related improvements and services; WHEREAS, the Agency now plans to establish the Mossdale Tract OAD to fund a portion of the costs of constructing 200 -year improvements to the levee and flood control system providing protection to Mossdale Tract Area, and ensure proper maintenance and operation of the related levees and flood control facilities ( collectively, the " Services"); C- 1
ATTACHMENT 2
WHEREAS, the Services will provide special benefits to certain land in the Mossdale Tract Area ( the "Properties") within the proposed boundaries of the Mossdale Tract OAD; WHEREAS, the Agency has engaged the firm of Willdan Financial Services, to have a registered professional engineer
Report (" Engineer' sReport") establishing
certified by
a methodology
the State of California
to determine
prepare
and
a
apportion
detailed
the
Engineer' s
special
benefits received by the Properties from the Services and to allocate the costs of the Services in proportion to said special benefits;
WHEREAS, the proposed boundaries of the Mossdale Tract OAD area include all the Properties that receive special benefit from the Services, while excluding properties not receiving special benefits from the Services and any incidentally -benefited properties in adjacent areas; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Agency has determined to undertake proceedings pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Government Code section 54703 et. seq. ("Act") to establish the Mossdale Tract OAD and to levy assessments to pay costs of the Services for the Properties to be included within the Mossdale Tract OAD boundary; WHEREAS, the imposition of a new special assessment is subject to constitutional procedural requirements, including a ballot procedure involving the owners of the parcels proposed to be assessed;
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Agency adopted Resolution No. 24- 07, which:
Proposed forming the Mossdale Tract OAD and levying a special benefit assessment; Identified the Mossdale Tract OAD' sproposed boundary;
Preliminarily approved the Engineer' s Report;
Fixed the time of a public hearing to hear public comment on the proposed Mossdale Tract OAD and special benefit assessment; and,
Directed the Agency' sconsultants and staff to undertake the procedural and approval processes including the mailing of notices and ballots which are necessary for the establishment of the Mossdale Tract OAD and levying of a special assessment proportional to the special benefits to be provided by the Services; WHEREAS, also on April 18, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Agency adopted Resolution No. 24- 08, which adopted Proposition 218 procedures to be followed in the implementation of the provisions of Proposition 218 relating to the proposed Mossdale Tract OAD the " 218 Procedures), and the 218 Procedures have been followed in connection with the activities directed by Resolution No. 24- 07;
WHEREAS, during May and June of 2024 the Agency conducted an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 in which the landowners that would be specially benefited by the Services were provided by mail with notice of the proposed special assessment and public hearing and also provided the opportunity to complete a ballot as to whether the Agency should form the proposed Mossdale Tract OAD and levy the assessment; SJAFCA Resolution 24-2
C- 2
ATTACHMENT 2
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2024, the Board received a report from Staff and Consultants which included as Attachment 1 Addendum No. 1 to the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Preliminary Engineer' s Report Formation of Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District prepared by Willdan Financial Services dated April 18, 2024; WHEREAS, as part of the assessment ballot proceeding, the Board of Directors of the Agency held a public hearing on June 20, 2024 at 6: 00 PM in the City Council Chambers, Lathrop City Hall, located at 390 Towne Centre Dr., Lathrop, California for the purpose of receiving comments on and protests to the proposed benefit assessment and for accepting new or changed ballots from specially benefited landowners; and
WHEREAS, during the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the Agency heard and considered all public comments.
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2024, upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the Agency adopted Resolution No. 24- 19 receiving Addendum No. 1 to the Preliminary Engineer' sReport for the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District and directing the tabulation of the ballots for the formation of the Mossdale Tract Overlay Assessment District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency as follows:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
2. Ballot Proceeding. A total of 2, 430 assessment ballots were returned and received prior to the close of the public input portion of the public hearing on June 20, 2024. Of the assessment ballots returned, 2, 335 assessment ballots were deemed valid, and 95 assessment ballots were declared invalid in that they were either not marked with a " Yes" or "No", were marked with both a " Yes" and a " No", were not signed, or for some other reason. In addition, ballots that were mutilated in such a way where the property ownership and barcode information was illegible or missing were excluded from the tabulation counts above.
3. Ballot Tabulation. The canvass of the assessment ballots submitted by property owners is complete and was certified by the Larsen Wurzel & Associates, Inc., and the votes cast were as follows:
Total Number of Valid Ballots Received: 2, 335
Total Mossdale Tract OAD Amount of Valid Ballots: $458, 106. 48 Total Number of Valid " Yes" Votes: 1, 434
Total Weighted Value of "Yes" Votes: $344, 283. 70
Total Weighted Percentage of "Yes" Votes: 75. 15%
Total Number of Valid " No" Votes: 901
Total Weighted Value of "No" Votes: $113, 822. 78
Total Weighted Percentage of "No" Votes: 24. 85%
Total Number of " Invalid" Ballots: 95
Total Mossdale Tract OAD Amount of "Invalid" Ballots: $ 23, 457. 78 SJAFCA Resolution 24-2
C- 3
ATTACHMENT 2
After the ballots were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property, the tabulation shows that 75. 15% of the valid ballots were cast in support of the Mossdale Tract OAD formation. Since a majority protest, as defined by Article XIII D of the California Constitution, did not exist, the Board may levy the assessment as described in the Final Engineer' s Report to pay the costs and expenses of the Services identified therein.
4. Final Engineer' sReport. The Final Engineer' s Report for the Mossdale Tract OAD, which reflects the information in Addendum No. 1 presented at the June 20, 2024 public hearing, together with the diagram of the Mossdale Tract OAD contained therein, and the proposed Benefit Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024-5 contained therein, has been presented to the Board of Directors at this meeting and is incorporated herein by reference, are hereby confirmed and approved.
5. Findings. That based on the oral and documentary evidence, including the Final Engineer' s Report, offered and received at the public hearing, the Board finds and determines that: (a) each of the several assessed lots and parcels of land within the Mossdale Tract OAD will be specially benefited by the Services ( as described in the Final Engineer' s Report) in at least the amount of the benefit assessment apportioned against such lots and parcels of land, respectively; and ( b) there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of the evidence is in favor of, this finding and determination as to special benefit to property within the LCMA Assessment District from the Services to be financed with assessment proceeds.
6. Mossdale Tract OAD Formation. The Mossdale Tract OAD is hereby formed, and assessments consistent with the Final Engineer' s Report, as modified by successful appeals, are hereby levied, pursuant to the Act.
7. Annual Levy of Assessments. The first assessments to be levied on property in the Mossdale Tract OAD will be for fiscal year 2024-5 with authorized maximum assessment.
8. Authorized Services. The Services to be financed with assessment proceeds described in the Final Engineer' s Report are hereby ordered.
Report,
9. to
Maximum
ensure that
Assessment
the Agency
Adjustment
can provide
per
the
CPI.
needed
As described
Services over
in the
time
Final
the
Engineer' s
Board of
Directors of the Agency will have the authority, pursuant to Government Code Section 53739 ( b), to levy the assessment within a designated range on an annual basis. The designated range will be from a minimum assessment, up to and including the authorized maximum assessment, as adjusted annually based on the CPI as described below.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2025-6, the maximum authorized assessment may be increased subject to an annual inflationary escalator, based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index February to February CPI -W for the San Francisco -Oakland - Hayward all Items, with Base Year 1982- 84 = 100, published by the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, subject to a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 4% in any given year as described in the " Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula)" section of the Final Engineer' sReport.
10. Filing ofMap & Collection of Assessment. SJAFCA staff is directed to file or cause to be filed the diagram of Mossdale Tract OAD, the Final Engineer' sReport and a certified copy of this Resolution with the Auditor/ Controller of San Joaquin County. Upon such filing, commencing in Fiscal Year 2024-5 and each year thereafter upon approval by the Board of Directors of the Agency, the County/ Aditor Controller shall enter on the County tax roll opposite SJAFCA Resolution 24-2
C- 4
ATTACHMENT 2
each lot or parcel of land in the Mossdale Tract OAD the amount of assessment thereupon as shown in the Final Engineer' sReport and described in this Resolution. The benefit assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County ad valorem taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County ad valorem taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection by the County Tax Collector, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due the County for collection, shall be paid to the Agency for the purposes of the Mossdale Tract OAD.
11. Separate Fund Requirement. The monies representing assessments collected shall be deposited in a separate fund or funds designated for the Mossdale Tract OAD. Amounts deposited to such fund( s) shall be expended only for the Services that specially benefit the lands within the Mossdale Tract OAD as described in the Final Engineers Report.
12. Administrative Corrections. The assessment, as it applies to any parcel, may be corrected, cancelled or a refund granted as appropriate, by order of the Board of Directors or by order of the Executive Director of the Agency. Any such corrections, cancellations or refunds shall be limited to current or future fiscal years and shall not be granted retroactively. The Agency may adopt, in the future, as the need arises, additional policies or procedures as needed to efficiently and effectively administer the Mossdale Tract OAD.
13. CEQA Compliance. The creation of the assessment funding mechanism is exempt from CEQA because it provides a
funding mechanism in support of future actions which will be separately analyzed as projects under CEQA. Agency staff is directed to prepare and file or cause to be filed a Notice of Exemption to that effect with the proper office.
SJAFCA Resolution 24-2
C- 5
ATTACHMENT 2
14. Proposition 218 Compliance. The assessment is in compliance with all laws pertaining to it, including Article XIII- D of the California Constitution ( Proposition 218), and as described in the Final Engineers Report, the assessment is being levied without regard to property valuation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 20
ATTEST:
CHRIS ELIAS, Secretary
of the San Joaquin Area
Flood Control Agency
APPROVED •' 8 TO FOR
SCOTT L.. 5 ' I'
for the S Jo. qui Area
Flood Co, • Age c
ounsel
PAUL AKINJO, Chair
of the San Joaquin Are
Flood Control Agency
SJAFCA Resolution 24-2
C- 6
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX D:
RD 17 LSRP PROJECT SUPPORTING TABLES
Table D1 Remaining Expenditure Schedule for Phase 3 LSRP D- 1 Table D2 EIP Funding Agreement Credit D- 2
Table D3 State Payments Received to Date & State Share Remaining D- 3 Table D4 Expenses Reported to DWR D- 4
Table DS Historic RD 17 Financial Statements D- 6
LWA
LARSEN WURZEI
Associates. Inc 1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2024 0903. docx Table D3
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Estimated Remaining Expenditure Schedule for LSRP ( All Phases) Month & Year
Remaining Costs
Mar 2023 Apr 2023 May 2023 Jun 2023 Jul 2023 Aug 2023 Sep 2023 Oct 2023 Nov 2023 Dec 2023 TOTAL 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 - 895, 42 Total Expenses 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 111, 932 - 895, 42 Prepared by LWA Page 1 of 1 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table D2
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
EIP Funding Agreement Credit
Levee Seepage Repair Project Phase Eligible Project Credit State Share LSRP - Phase I 2, 630,49 1, 578, 389
LSRP - Phase II 3, 756, 668 2,54, 001
LSRP - Phase III 625, 090 375, 04
Total 7, 012, 406 $ 4, 207, 444
Source: KSN
Prepared by LWA 1 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table D3
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
State Payments Received to Date & State Share Remaining Received Date Total State Share Credit Applied
4/ 15/ 2010 2, 182, 950 1, 389, 150 793, 800
6/ 8/ 2010 886, 525 602, 717 283, 808
12/9/ 2011 2, 828, 433 2, 355, 408 473, 025
5/ 30/ 212 452, 032 420, 838 31, 194
11/3/ 2013 1, 617, 235 1, 041,86 576, 149
Through Q40 7, 618, 404 5, 981, 017 1, 637, 387
Subtotal 15, 585,78 11, 790, 215 3, 795, 363
Remaining 24, 000,00 23, 587, 919 412, 081
Total 39, 585,78 35,78, 135 4, 207, 444
Source: KSN
Prepared by LWA 1 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table D4
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Total Actual and Estimated Expenses Reported to DWR
Project Quarter Year
Fiscal LSRP - Phase I LSRP - Phase II LSRP - Phase Ill
Quarter Expenses Expenses Expenses
Quarter 1 2010 Q1 $ 0 $ 866, 617 $ 233, 864
Quarter 2 2010 Q2 $ 0 $ 1, 973, 380 $ 568, 953
Quarter 3 2010 Q3 $ 2, 019 $ 944, 450 $ 341, 041
Quarter 4 2010 Q4 $ 2, 717 $ 320, 758 $ 484, 776
Quarter 5 2011 Q1 $ 1, 756 $ 58, 861 $ 573, 904
Quarter 6 2011 Q2 $ 0 $ 327, 945 $ 188,90
Quarter 7 2011 Q3 $ 1, 413 $ 79, 657 $ 179, 90
Quarter 8 2011 Q4 $ 2,47 $ 27, 994 $ 189, 457
Quarter 9 2012 Q1 $ 0 $ 119, 734 $ 219, 941
Quarter 10 2012 Q2 $ 1, 311 $ 379, 956 $ 160, 688
Quarter 11 2012 Q3 $ 1, 444 $ 552,68 $ 131, 829
Quarter 12 2012 Q4 $ 502 $ 383, 096 $ 149, 982
Quarter 13 2013 01 $ 0 $ 83, 459 $ 188, 263
Quarter 14 2013 Q2 $ 638 $ 107, 557 $ 130, 947
Quarter 15 2013 Q3 $ 509 $ 7, 251 $ 160, 951
Quarter 16 2013 Q4 $ 0 $ 4, 524 $ 170, 767
Quarter 17 2014 Q1 $ 0 $ 369 $ 185, 491
Quarter 18 2014 Q2 $ 0 $ 6, 935 $ 283, 552
Quarter 19 2014 Q3 $ 0 $ 9, 000 $ 155, 771
Quarter 20 2014 Q4 $ 999 $ 7, 444 $ 299, 970
Quarter 21 2015 Q1 $ 7, 930 $ 7,17 $ 224, 170
Quarter 22 2015 Q2 $ 7, 140 $ 18, 637 $ 184, 474
Quarter 23 2015 Q3 $ 540 $ 7, 305 $ 234, 779
Quarter 24 2015 Q4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,25, 519
Quarter 25 2016 Q1 $ 3, 720 $ 8, 378 $ 482, 931
Quarter 26 2016 Q2 $ 228 $ 25, 387 $ 216,29
Quarter 27 2016 Q3 $ 0 $ 20, 015 $ 235, 688
Quarter 28 2016 Q4 $ 0 $ 69, 326 $ 358, 058
Quarter 29 2017 Q1 $ 0 $ 9,34 $ 3, 195, 608
Quarter 30 2017 Q2 $ 0 $ 6, 489 $ 2, 632, 159
Quarter 31 2017 Q3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 872,05
Quarter 32 2017 Q4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1, 000, 814
Quarter 33 2018 Q1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 268,53
Quarter 34 2018 Q2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 277, 834
Quarter 35 2018 Q3 $ 0 $ 58, 041 $ 255, 105
Quarter 36 2018 Q4 $ 0 $ 10, 068 $ 261, 022
Quarter 37 2019 Q1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 120, 598
Quarter 38 2019 Q2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 419, 527
Quarter 39 2019 Q3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 318, 646
Quarter 40 2019 Q4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 956, 206
Quarter 41 2020 Q1 $ 0 $ 12, 015 $ 2, 490,62
Quarter 42 2020 Q2 $ 0 $ 7, 990 $ 2, 184, 903
Prepared by LWA Page 1 of 2
D- 4
1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx
Table D4
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Total Actual and Estimated Expenses Reported to DWR
Project Quarter Year
Fiscal LSRP - Phase I LSRP - Phase II LSRP - Phase Ill
Quarter Expenses Expenses Expenses
Quarter 43 2020 Q3
Quarter 44 2020 Q4
Quarter 45 2021 01
Quarter 46 2021 Q2
Quarter 47 2021 Q3
Quarter 48 2021 Q4
Quarter 49 2022 01
Quarter 50 2022 Q2
Quarter 51 2022 Q3
Quarter 52 2022 Q4
Quarter 53 2023 Q1
Quarter 54 2023 Q2
Quarter 55 2023 Q3
Quarter 56 2023 Q4
Quarter 57 2024 Q1
Quarter 58 2024 Q2
Est. Quarter 59 2024 Q3
Est. Quarter 60 2024 Q4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6, 375
1, 579
10, 076
7, 020
10, 005
5, 319
0 0
24, 659
32, 076
7, 961
5, 256
2,79
1, 530
1, 020
5, 355
5, 000
0 544, 959
215,80
507, 193
209, 602. 58
195,86. 88
127, 530. 1
947, 312. 18
8, 796, 972. 11
15, 091, 111. 0
6, 174, 013. 37
1, 319, 576. 19
472, 690. 01
3,85, 566. 84
3, 823,22. 14
1,18, 686. 14
129, 642. 70
792, 986
97, 567
Total 35, 112 $ 6,48, 366 $ 67, 263, 816
Source: KSN, LWA
Prepared by LWA Page 2 of 2
D- 5
1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx
Table DS
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan/
Historic RD 17 Financial Data
Fiscal Year 2010 2011 2012
Fiscal Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenues
State Assistance 1, 534, 738 1, 534, 738 - - - - - 1, 640, 233 1, 640, 233 Assessments 1, 542, 907 1, 542, 907 - - 1, 573, 048 1, 573, 048 - 1, 495, 598 1, 495, 598 Property taxes 80, 197 80, 197 - - 121, 729 121, 729 - - 102, 670 102, 670 Interest 44, 107 44, 107 - - 32, 566 32, 566 - - 9, 557 9, 557 Other revenue 100, 550 100, 550 - - 100, 295 100, 295 - - 562 562 Penalties and interest on late assessments - - - - - - - - - Total Revenues 3,02, 498 3,02, 498 1, 827, 637 1, 827, 637 - 3, 248, 619 3, 248, 619 Expenditures
Levee repairs and maintenance 182, 568 182, 568 - - 90, 630 90, 630 - - 78, 201 78, 201 Engineering 44, 731 44, 731 - - 63, 021 63, 021 - - 40, 144 40, 144 Legal and accounting 78, 800 78, 800 - - 82, 354 82, 354 - - 66,01 66,01 Vegetation control 42, 823 42, 823 - - 34, 175 34, 175 - - 34, 825 34, 825 Payroll expenses 4, 812 4, 812 - - 8, 482 8, 482 - - 6,23 6,23 Rodent control 3, 250 3, 250 - - 255 255 - - 12, 962 12, 962 County charges 14, 980 14, 980 - - 15, 096 15, 096 - 25, 768 25, 768 Insurance 7, 162 7, 162 - - 6, 293 6, 293 - - 5,36 5,36 Property Taxes - - - - - - - - - -
Eqipment Rental - - - - - - - - - -
Office expense/ supplies 132 132 - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous 11, 828 11, 828 - - 1, 287 1, 287 - - 375 375 Trustee fees 438 438 - - 388 388 - - 438 438
Automobile expense 1, 800 1, 800 - - 1, 908 1, 908 - - 1, 800 1, 800 Dues and subscriptions 500 500 - - 500 500 - - 553 553
Permits 435 435 - - 435 435 - - -
Publication cost 61 61 - - 138 138 - - 238 238
Bank fees - - - - - - - - - -
Special projects 34,98 34,98 - - 29, 043 29, 043 - - 31, 721 31, 721 Bond Issuance Cost - - - - - - - - -
Reimbursements 150, 00 150, 00 - - - - - -
Equipment rental 1, 412 1, 412 - - - - - - -
Capital outlay 3, 892, 403 3, 892, 403 - - 2, 552, 743 2, 552, 743 - - 499,63 499,63 Debt service
Principal 453, 309 453, 309 - - 107, 500 107, 500 - - 112, 500 112, 500 Interest 376,91 376,91 - - 522, 27 522, 27 - - 518, 335 518, 335 Total Expenditures 5, 302, 227 5, 302, 227 - 3, 516, 471 3, 516, 471 - 1, 436, 079 1, 436, 079 Source, RD 17 Audited Financial Statements through Fiscal Year Ending lune 30, 2020 Future Years are based on projections using prior year data as assumed by LWA.
Prepared by LWA Page 1 of 5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table D5
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Historic RD 17 Financial Data
Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015
Fiscal Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 01 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenues
State Assistance - - - - 808, 618 808, 618 - -
Assessments 1, 450, 901 1, 450, 901 - - 1, 444, 959 1, 444, 959 - - 1, 415, 812 1, 415, 812 Property taxes 107,89 107,89 - - 106, 405 106, 405 - - 120, 689 120, 689 Interest 13, 447 13, 447 - - 14, 364 14, 364 - - 17, 264 17, 264 Other revenue 103, 85 103, 85 - - 6,25 6,25 - - 514 514 Penalties and interest on late assessments - - - - 3, 434 3, 434 - - - - Total Revenues 1, 675, 371 1, 675, 371 - - 2, 384, 404 2, 384, 404 - - 1, 554, 278 1, 554, 278 Expenditures
Levee repairs and maintenance 43, 227 43, 227 - - 132, 018 132, 018 - - 116,70 116,70 Engineering 31, 757 31, 757 - - 152, 597 152, 597 - - 99, 124 99, 124 Legal and accounting 65,67 65,67 - 104, 832 104, 832 - - 137, 060 137, 060 Vegetation control 41, 225 41, 225 - - 47,25 47,25 - - 41, 575 41, 575 Payroll expenses 8, 371 8, 371 - - 6, 831 6, 831 - - 5, 409 5, 409 Rodent control 3, 017 3, 017 - 3, 090 3, 090 - - 5, 785 5, 785 7 County charges 14, 984 14, 984 - - 15, 019 15, 019 - - 15,08 15,08 Insurance 8, 121 8, 121 - - 7,22 7,22 - - 7, 828 7, 828 Property Taxes - - - - - - - - -
Eqipment Rental - - - - - - - -
Office expense/ supplies - - - - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous 372 372 - - 1, 016 1, 016 - - 2, 333 2, 333 Trustee fees 1, 038 1, 038 - - 300 300 - - 375 375
Automobile expense 1,72 1,72 - - 723 723 - - 723 723
Dues and subscriptions 500 S00 - - 500 500 - - 500 500
Permits - - - - - - - 3, 535 3, 535
Publication cost 45 45 - - - - - - 91 91
Bank fees - - - - - - - - 2, 100 2, 100
Special projects 31, 721 31, 721 - - - - -
Bond Issuance Cost - - - - 49, 863 49, 863 - - - -
Reimbursements - - - - - - - - - -
Equipment rental - - - - -
Capital outlay 1,71,56 1,71,56 - - 344, 282 344, 282 - - 279, 875 279, 875 Debt service
Principal 117, 500 117, 500 - - 120, 00 120, 00 - - 125, 000 125, 000 Interest 513, 88 513, 88 - - 508, 897 508, 897 - - 471, 060 471, 060 Total Expenditures 2, 053, 706 2, 053, 706 1, 495, 112 1, 495, 112 1, 313, 647 1, 313, 647 Source. RD il Audited Financial Statements through Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2020 Future years are based on projections using prior year data as assumed by LWA Prepared by LWA Page 2 of 5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table D5
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Historic RD 17 Financial Data
Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018
Fiscal Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 QS Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 Revenues
State Assistance
Assessments 1, 403, 761 1, 403, 761
Property taxes 132, 475 132, 475
Interest 31, 917 31, 917
Other revenue 1, 056 1, 056
Penalties and interest on late assessments - -
4, 611 4, 611 - - 1, 732 1, 732
1, 403, 873 1, 403, 873 - - 1, 605, 323 1, 605, 323
145,66 145,66 - - 153, 355 153, 355
58, 882 58, 882 - - 80, 465 80, 465
3, 247 3, 247 - - 859 859
Total Revenues 1, 569, 208 1, 569, 208 - 1, 615, 778 1, 615, 778 1, 841, 733 1, 841, 733 Expenditures
Levee repairs and maintenance 700, 87 700, 87 - - 558, 933 558, 933 - - 763, 58 763, 58 Engineering 165, 311 165, 311 - - 190, 658 190, 658 - - 130, 929 130, 929 Legal and accounting 168, 652 168, 652 - - 172, 608 172, 608 - 164, 975 164, 975 Vegetation control 43, 925 43, 925 - - 113, 618 113, 618 - - 132, 73 132, 73 Payroll expenses 5, 160 5, 160 - - 4, 947 4, 947 - - 3, 601 3, 601 Rodent control 2, 649 2, 649 - - - - - - - -
7 County charges 15, 270 15, 270 - - 15, 272 15, 272 - - 15, 720 15, 720 Insurance 8, 080 8, 080 - - 8, 266 8, 266 - - 8, 780 8, 780 Property Taxes - - - - - - - - -
Egipment Rental - - - - - - - - - -
Office expense/ supplies 350 350 - - - - - - 77 77
Miscellaneous 4, 118 4, 118 - - 7, 109 7, 109 - - 4, 175 4, 175 Trustee fees 400 400 - - 400 400 - - 388 388
Automobile expense 723 723 - - 723 723 - - 723 723
Dues and subscriptions 500 500 - - 500 500 - - 500 500
Permits - - - - - - -
Publication cost - - - - 53 53 - - 53 53
Bank fees - - - - - - - -
Special projects - - - - - - - - - -
Bond Issuance Cost - - - 319, 861 319, 861 - - - -
Reimbursements 658 658 - - - - - - -
Equipment rental - - - - 1, 560 1, 560 - -
Capital outlay 331, 69 331, 69 - - 2, 766, 672 2, 766, 672 - - 722, 604 722, 604 Debt service
Principal 163, 352 163, 352 - - 166, 758 166, 758 - - 372, 175 372, 175 Interest 455, 886 455, 886 - - 331, 53 331, 53 - - 465, 898 465, 898 Total Expenditures 2, 067, 456 2, 067, 456 4, 659, 448 4, 659, 448 2, 786, 857 2, 786, 857 Source. RD11 Audited Financial Statements through Fiscal Year Ending lune 30, 2020 Future Years are based on protections using pnor year data as assumed by LWA Prepared by LWA Page 3 of 5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 O827. xlsx Table 05
Mossdale Tract 2023 Financing Plan
Historic RD 17 Financial Data
Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021
Fiscal Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenues
State Assistance - - - - 3, 857, 939 3, 857, 939 - -
Assessments 1, 478, 039 1, 478, 039 - - 1, 499, 109 1, 499, 109 - - 1, 529, 091 1, 529, 091 Property taxes 166, 810 166, 810 - - 178, 440 178, 440 - - 183, 793 183, 793 Interest 98, 014 98, 014 - - 88, 173 88, 173 - - 90, 818 90, 818 Other revenue - - - - 20,38 20,38 - - - -
Penalties and interest on late assessments - - - - - - - - - - Total Revenues 1, 742, 862 1, 742, 862 - 5, 643, 897 5, 643, 897 - 1, 803, 701 1, 803, 701 Expenditures
Levee repairs and maintenance 264, 169 264, 169 - - 247, 507 247, 507 - - 288, 88 288, 88 Engineering 82, 101 82, 101 - - 93, 890 93, 890 - - 96, 706 96, 706 Legal and accounting 97, 835 97, 835 - - 83, 153 83, 153 - - 85, 648 85, 648 Vegetation control 48, 225 48, 225 - - 52, 475 52, 475 - - 54, 049 54, 049 Payroll expenses 10, 850 10, 850 - - 33, 086 33, 086 - - 34, 079 34, 079 Rodent control 13, 815 13, 815 - - 30, 418 30418 - - 31,31 31,31 County charges 16, 055 16, 055 - - 15, 797 15, 797 - - 16, 271 16, 271 Insurance 9, 000 9, 000 - - 11, 439 11, 439 - - 11, 782 11, 782 Property Taxes - - - 7, 134 7, 134 - - 7, 348 7, 348
Eqipment Rental - - - 3, 763 3, 763 - - 3, 875 3, 875
Office expense/ supplies - - - - 2, 541 2, 541 - - 2, 617 2, 617 Miscellaneous 4, 325 4, 325 - - 1, 897 1, 897 - - 1, 953 1, 953 Trustee fees 513 513 - - 850 850 - - 876 876
Automobile expense 739 739 - - 754 754 - 777 777
Dues and subscriptions 500 500 - - 500 500 - - 515 515
Permits - - - 347 347 - - 357 357
Publication cost - - - 228 228 - - 234 234
Bank fees - - - - - -
Special projects - - - - - - - - - -
Bond Issuance Cost - - - - - - - - - -
Reimbursements - - - - - - - - -
Equipment rental - - -
Capital outlay 407, 809 407, 809 - - 3, 116, 273 3, 116, 273 - - 3, 209, 761 3, 209, 761 Debt service - -
Principal 249, 504 249, 504 - - 258, 813 258, 813 - - 266, 577 266, 577 Interest 457,32 457,32 - - 449, 662 449, 662 - - 463, 152 463, 152 Total Expenditures 1, 662, 867 1, 662, 867 4,10, 524 4,10, 524 4, 576, 795 4, 576, 795 Source' R0 17 Audited Financial Statements through Fiscal Year Ending lune 30, 2020. Future Years are based on projections using poor year data as assumed by LWA.
Prepared by LWA Page 4 of 5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827- xlsx Table DS
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Historic RD 17 Financial Data
Fiscal Year 2022 2023 2024
Fiscal Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenues
State Assistance - - - - -
Assessments 1, 559, 672 1, 559, 672 - - 1, 590, 866 1, 590, 866 Property taxes 189, 306 189, 306 - - 194, 986 194, 986
Interest 93, 542 93, 542 - - 96, 348 96, 348
Other revenue - - - - - -
Penalties and interest on late assessments - - -
1, 622,83 1, 622,83
200, 835 200, 835
99, 239 99, 239
Total Revenues 1, 842, 521 1, 842, 521 - - 1, 882, 200 1, 882, 200 1, 922, 757 1, 922, 757 Expenditures
Levee repairs and maintenance 297, 554 297, 554 - - 306, 481 306, 481 - - 315, 675 315, 675 Engineering 99, 607 99, 607 - - 102, 596 102, 596 - - 105, 673 105, 673 Legal and accounting 88, 217 88, 217 - - 90, 864 90, 864 - - 93, 589 93, 589 Vegetation control 55, 671 55, 671 - - 57, 341 57, 341 - - 59, 061 59, 061 Payroll expenses 35, 101 35, 101 - - 36, 154 36, 154 - - 37, 239 37, 239 Rodent control 32, 270 32, 270 - - 33, 239 33, 239 - - 34, 236 34, 236 County charges 16, 759 16, 759 - - 17, 262 17, 262 - - 17, 780 17, 780 Insurance 12,36 12,36 - - 12, 500 12, 500 - - 12, 875 12, 875 Property Taxes 7, 568 7, 568 - - 7,96 7,96 - - 8, 029 8, 029 Eqipment Rental 3, 992 3, 992 - - 4, 111 4, 111 - - 4, 235 4, 235 Office expense/ supplies 2, 695 2, 695 - - 2, 776 2, 776 - - 2, 859 2, 859 Miscellaneous 2, 012 2, 012 - - 2, 072 2, 072 - - 2, 135 2, 135 Trustee fees 902 902 - - 929 929 - - 957 957
Automobile expense 800 800 - - 824 824 - - 849 849
Dues and subscriptions 530 530 - - 546 546 - - 563 563
Permits 368 368 - - 379 379 - - 391 391
Publication cost 241 241 - - 249 249 - - 256 256
Bank fees - - - - - - -
Special projects - - - - - - - - - -
Bond Issuance Cost - - - - - - - - - -
Reimbursements - - - - - - - - -
Equipment rental - - - - - - - - -
Capital outlay 3,06, 053 3,06, 053 - - 3, 405, 235 3, 405, 235 - - 3, 507, 392 3, 507, 392 Debt service - - - - - - - - - -
Principal 274, 575 274, 575 - - 282, 812 282, 812 - - 291,96 291,96 Interest 477, 046 477, 046 - - 491, 358 491, 358 - - 506, 099 506, 099 Total Expenditures 4, 714, 099 4, 714, 099 4, 855, 522 4, 855, 522 5, 001, 188 5, 001, 188 Source . RD 17 Audited Financial Statements through Fiscal Year Ending lune 30, 2020. Future Years are based on projections using prior year data as assumed by LWA Prepared by LWA Page 5 of 5 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. x/sx San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
2022 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update
January 24, 2023
APPENDIX E:
EIFD ANALYSIS SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Reference the
MOSSDALE TRACT ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT —
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN FINAL REPORT
PREPARED BY ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.
DATED JUNE 2, 2022
Available on SJAFCA' sWebsite:
https:// www. sjafca. org/ home/ showpublisheddocument/ 1275/ 637902252871700000
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SAN JOAQUIN AREA
FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY AND THE MOSSDALE TRACT ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DATED JUNE 15, 2023
SJAFCA- PA MOU E- 1
Table El Updated EIFD & Financing Supporting Tables — Financing Revenues and Debt Service E- 10
LWA
LARSEN WURZEI
Associates. Inc. 1801014 Adequate Progress Report Appendix Covers 2024 0903. docx
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY AND
THE MOSSDALE TRACT ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
This Memorandum of Understanding ( this " MOU") is dated as of June 15_, 2023 the " Effective Date"), and is entered into by and between the MOSSDALE TRACT INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, a public agency ( the " Authority"), and the SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, a joint
powers authority (" SJAFCA"). Authority and SJAFCA are sometimes referred to in this MOU, individually, as a " Party" and, collectively, as the " Parties." The Parties enter into this MOU with reference to the following recited facts ( each, a " Recital"):
RECITALS
A. The California Legislature enacted California Government Code ( the " Code") sections 53398.0 through 53398. 88 (the " EIFD Law") authorizing cities and counties to form enhanced infrastructure financing districts and use specified property tax increment revenue generated within such districts to finance certain infrastructure and community benefit projects; and
B. In enacting the EIFD Law, the California Legislature found and determined that with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, public benefits will accrue, if local agencies finance public infrastructure and community benefit projects authorized under the EIFD Law; C. On January 13, 2022 the City Council of the City of Lathrop adopted its resolution stating its intention to establish the Mossdale Tract Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District the " EIFD");
D. on January 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Manteca adopted its resolution of intent to participate in the proposed EIFD;
E. on February 8, 2022, the City Council of the City of Stockton adopted its resolution of intent to participate in the proposed EIFD;
F. on February 15, 2022, the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors adopted its resolution of intent to participate in the proposed EIFD; G. on March 2, 2022, the Authority directed the preparation of an Infrastructure Financing Plan ( the " IFP") for the District;
H. on June 14, 2022, the City of Stockton, adopted its resolution approving the IFP; I. on June 21, 2022, the County of San Joaquin, adopted its resolution approving the IFP;
1861502v2 SC409779
J. on June 21, 2022, the City of Manteca, adopted its resolution approving the IFP; K. on July 11, 2022, the City of Lathrop, adopted its resolution approving the IFP; L. on July 21, 2022, the Authority adopted its resolution adopting the IFP for the EIFD and forming the EIFD;
M. The IFP provides for the EIFD to financially assist certain public flood control infrastructure projects including, but not limited to, public flood risk reduction infrastructure associated with ensuring that the resulting levee system complies with the Urban Levee Design Criteria promulgated by the California Department of Water Resources and SJAFCA' s Resolution No. 19- 06 and SJAFCA' sAdopted Policy for Adapting Design Standards for the Mossdale Tract Area of SJAFCA in light of Climate Change;
N. SJAFCA and Authority desire to provide for an efficient process for the Authority to provide financial assistance to the identified SJAFCA infrastructure projects and for SJAFCA to provide staff resources for the efficient operation of the District; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals, the covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in this MOU, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This MOU shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until amended by the parties or modified pursuant to Section 3. 1.2, subject to the rights of the Parties under Section 7. Notwithstanding any provision of this MOU to the contrary, the term shall not exceed the duration of the EIFD.
2. ANNUAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM PROCESS. SJAFCA and Authority acknowledge and agree that all of the public infrastructure projects identified in the IFP for financing thru the EIFD constitute the Authority capital improvement projects (" Authority CIP( s)") and are part of a
larger group of SJAFCA capital improvement projects (" CIPs") that will be designed, contracted for and constructed by SJAFCA, or by other public entities pursuant to contribution agreements with SJAFCA for SJAFCA to reimburse costs of construction of the capital improvements to the public entities.
3. 1. Implementation. In order to provide for implementation of the Authority CIPs, SJAFCA and Authority agree that, by the end of the third fiscal year quarter of each fiscal year during which this MOU is in effect, SJAFCA shall deliver to Authority a list (the " List") of the Authority CIPs that SJAFCA plans to implement ( whether one or more project phases or the complete Authority CIPs) during the immediately following fiscal year and request Authority transfer of funding for such Authority CIPs (" Approved Authority CIPs").
3. 1.. To the extent that Authority has funds currently on -hand and/ or that are projected to be received and available ( not previously committed to Authority operating expenses in the applicable Authority fiscal year budget or other Authority CIPs identified by SJAFCA for implementation) to finance Authority CIPs (" Available Funds") and SJAFCA has indicated that it needs such Available Funds for the planning, permitting, design and construction of the CIPs on the List, Authority shall allocate such Available 186] 502v2 SC409779 2
E- 2
Funds to SJAFCA for the Approved Authority CIPs on the List in the order of priority presented by SJAFCA.
3. 1.2. Notwithstanding this Section 3. 1, for fiscal years 2023-4, 2024- 2025, 2025-026, and 2026-027, if SJAFCA has not used the funding provided by the Authority within two years of receipt of that funding, then the Authority or one of its member agencies may request that the Authority and SJAFCA meet and confer as to the need and timing of future funding. Such meet and confer shall occur as between the Authority and SJAFCA and shall include a
representative of each of the member agencies. The meeting shall discuss whether ( i) any additional funding is needed from the Authority in the next or future fiscal years; (ii) the timing of any future funding; and ( iii) whether the funding that has not been used should be returned to the Authority to be further returned back to the agency that provided the property tax increment, subject to compliance with any applicable Authority and/ or SJAFCA financing obligations and covenants and applicable Federal tax law. Absent agreement of the Authority, SJAFCA, and the representatives of the member agencies, Available Funds shall continue to be allocated.
3. 1.. Allocation of funds projected to be received is subject to actual receipt of such funds by the Authority. The amount of Available Funds allocated to any Authority CIP shall be equal to the estimated cost of such Authority CIP not funded from other financing sources, until Authority has no more Available Funds or the amount of the estimated cost of such Authority CIP not funded from other financing sources has been allocated to SJAFCA, whichever occurs first.
3. 1.4. Authority shall consider allocation of Available Funds to SJAFCA for the Authority CIPs identified for implementation in the immediately following fiscal year, to the extent practical, by the end of the third fiscal year quarter of each fiscal year, or as otherwise docketed for consideration by the Authority.
3. 2. Funding Reallocation. If and to the extent that SJAFCA' s priorities change for Authority
CIPs identified for implementation, whether due to emergency, unforeseen circumstances accelerating or slowing project progress, other funding becoming available, increasing or decreasing costs, etc., SJAFCA may reallocate all or a portion of money allocated by Authority to another Authority CIP in compliance with the IFP and subject to approval by the Authority.
3. 2.1. SJAFCA shall only spend money from the Authority on Authority CIPs in accordance with SJAFCA' sthen current process for budgeting and executing its projects.
3. 2.. If and to the extent that an Authority CIP allocated funds by Authority will not proceed to completion of the entire project, phase( s), or other elements for which Authority provided funding, such funding shall be either allocated by SJAFCA to another Authority CIP allocated funding by Authority or returned to Authority.
4. AUTHORITY BUDGET. Authority will endeavor to adopt a budget for its operating expenses and Authority CIP expenditures for Authority' simmediately following fiscal year by the end of the third fiscal year quarter of each fiscal year. Authority' soperating expense portion of its budget shall include funds allocated to reimburse SJAFCA for staff services provided to Authority pursuant to Section 5. When SJAFCA delivers to Authority the list ofAuthority CIPs that SJAFCA 1861502v2 SC409779 3
E- 3
plans to implement during the immediately following fiscal year, pursuant to Section 3, SJAFCA shall also deliver a budget estimate to Authority for SJAFCA staff services and Authority program operating expenses to Authority for the immediately following fiscal year.
5. SJAFCA STAFFING OF AUTHORITY. SJAFCA shall provide the employees, consultants, and legal services (" SJAFCA Staff') for the Authority on an as needed basis.
Authority shall pay SJAFCA for the documented time of SJAFCA Staff who provide services to Authority at each person' s then applicable hourly SJAFCA salary rate, including applicable overhead and load, or such rates as are charged to SJAFCA for non- SJAFCA employees. All SJAFCA Staff expenses incurred by Authority shall be billed to Authority and paid to SJAFCA using a billable internal order of SJAFCA.
5. 1. At the request ofAuthority, SJAFCA shall send detailed accounting records of SJAFCA staff costs incurred in staffing the Authority. The costs of SJAFCA staff incurred by Authority shall accrue during any time period that Authority does not have revenue to pay such costs and shall be payable when Authority has revenue available to pay such costs.
5. 2 SJAFCA and Authority acknowledge that employees, consultants, and legal counsel are providing services to both and hereby waive any conflicts that may arise from providing such services, recognizing the significant overlapping functions of SJAFCA and Authority and that Authority has been created for the exclusive purpose of providing needed funding to SJAFCA for the Authority CIPs.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND POLICIES. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, regulations, orders, ordinances, resolutions, permits, requirements, and policies of the Federal, State, SJAFCA and other local governments to the extent applicable to their performance under this MOU.
7. REMEDIES FOR NON- PERFORMANCE. Notwithstanding any provision of this MOU to the contrary, if a Party fails to comply with any term or condition of this MOU, the other Party may exercise any or all of the following remedies: (a) any remedy specified in this MOU for such non- performance; or (b) any remedy available to the Party at law or in equity for such nonperformance. The rights and remedies of the Parties under this MOU are cumulative and exercise of any one or more of such rights or remedies shall not limit, waive, or deny any of a Party' s other rights or remedies under this MOU, at law or in equity, existing as of the Effective Date or later enacted or established, that may be available to a Party.
8. INFORMAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If the Parties have any dispute as to their respective rights, obligations, or duties under this MOU, or the meaning or interpretation of any provision contained in this MOU, they shall first attempt to resolve such dispute by informal discussion between their respective representatives. Within five ( 5) calendar days of determining the existence of any such dispute, the Party determining there is such a dispute may give Notice to the other Party of the existence of the dispute and the need to meet informally to resolve such dispute. The Parties shall endeavor, thereafter, to meet within five (5) calendar days of the second Party' sreceipt of such Notice, or at such time as is reasonable under the circumstances. 4 E- 4
9. AUTHORITY INDEMNIFICATION OF SJAFCA. Authority shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless SJAFCA, its elected officials, officers, employees, representatives, and agents from and against any and all claims asserted, or liability established, for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to Authority members or Authority officers, employees, invitees, guests, or agents that arise from, or are connected with, or are caused, or claimed to be caused by, this MOU, or by one or more acts or omissions of Authority, Authority members, or Authority or Authority officers, employees, invitees, guests, or agents in performing this MOU, and all expenses of investigating and defending against same, including attorney' sfees and costs.
However, Authority' s duty to indemnify and hold harmless pursuant to this Section 9 shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of SJAFCA, its elected officials, officers, employees, representatives, or agents. SJAFCA may, at its sole discretion, conduct or participate in its own defense of any claim subject to this Section 9.
If SJAFCA elects to conduct or participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim subject to this Section 9, Authority shall pay SJAFCA for all costs related thereto, including attorney' sfees and costs. Authority shall pay SJAFCA any and all costs SJAFCA incurs enforcing the indemnity and defense provisions set forth in this Section 9.
10. SJAFCA INDEMNIFICATION OF AUTHORITY. SJAFCA shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless Authority, its board members, and Authority or Authority, officers, employees, representatives, and agents from and against any and all claims asserted, or liability established, for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to SJAFCA' selected officials, officers, employees, invitees, guests, or agents that arise from, or are connected with, or are caused, or claimed to be caused by, this MOU, or by one or more acts or omissions of SJAFCA, its elected officials, officers, employees, invitees, guests, or agents in performing this MOU, and all expenses of investigating and defending against same, including attorney' sfees and costs.
However, SJAFCA' s
duty to indemnify and hold harmless pursuant to this Section 10 shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of Authority, Authority members, or Authority or Authority officers, employees, representatives, or agents. Authority may, at its sole discretion, conduct or participate in its own defense of any claim subject to this Section 10. IfAuthority elects to conduct or participate in its own defense or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim subject to this Section 10, SJAFCA shall pay Authority for all costs related thereto, including attorney' sfees and costs. SJAFCA shall pay Authority any and all costs Authority incurs enforcing the indemnity and defense provisions set forth in this Section 10.
11. NOTICE. In all cases where Notice is required under this MOU, Notice may be given by electronic mail, messenger, nationally recognized overnight ( one -business day) courier, or United States Postal Service first class mail. A Notice shall be effective on the date sent by electronic mail, if sent before 3: 00 p. m. Pacific Time, the date personally delivered by messenger to the Notice recipient, the first business day after deposit with an overnight courier for next business day delivery, or the third business day after the Notice is deposited with the United States Postal Service, in each case with all applicable postage or delivery costs paid and addressed to SJAFCA or Authority as specified below. SJAFCA or Authority may change its Notice address by Notice delivered in accordance with this Section 11.
Ifto the SJAFCA: San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
22 E. Weber Avenue, Room 301
Stockton, CA 95202
86] 502v2 SC409779 5
E- 5
Exhibit A
Telephone: ( 209) 937- 8211
Attention: Board Secretary
Ifto the Authority: Mossdale Tract Infrastructure Financing District Public Financing Authority
22 E. Weber Avenue, Room 301
Stockton, CA 95202
Telephone:
Attention: Authority Secretary
12. NO ASSIGNMENT. Neither Party shall have any right to assign all or any portion of this MOU to a third person. Any putative assignment of either Party' srights, obligations, or duties under this MOU shall not create a contractual relationship between the other Party and any putative assignee, and any such assignment shall be ineffective, null and void. Any assignment in violation of this Section 12 is grounds for immediate termination of this MOU, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Party not making the assignment.
13. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
13.. Governmental Powers. Nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a limitation upon the powers of SJAFCA or the Authority.
13. 2. Governing Law. The terms and conditions of this MOU shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State.
13. 3. Jurisdiction and Venue. The Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of, and that venue shall be in, any State court within the County of San Joaquin, State of California, for any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of, or related to, this MOU.
13. 4. Integration and Amendment. This MOU, and any exhibits attached to this MOU, fully express all understandings of the Parties concerning the matters covered in this MOU. Any and all prior negotiations and agreements between the Parties regarding the subject matter of this MOU are merged into this MOU. No change, alteration, amendment, or modification of the terms or conditions of this MOU, and no verbal understanding of the Parties, their officers, agents, or employees shall be valid, unless made in the form of a written amendment to this MOU signed by both Parties. The Parties agree to enter into any and all amendments to this MOU that are necessary to comply with any and all new or modified Federal or State laws affecting this MOU.
13. 5. No Waiver. No failure of either SJAFCA or Authority to insist upon the strict performance by the other of any term, covenant, or condition of this MOU, nor any failure to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach of any term, covenant, or condition of this MOU, shall constitute a waiver of any such breach or the requirement to comply with such term, covenant, or condition. No waiver of any breach shall affect or alter this MOU, and each and every term, covenant, and condition, in this MOU shall continue in full force and effect regarding any existing or subsequent breach. 1861502v2 SC409779 6
E- 6
13. 6. Successors in Interest. This MOU, and all rights, obligations, or duties under this MOU, shall be in full force and effect, whether or not any Party to this MOU has been succeeded by another entity, and all rights, obligations, or duties under this MOU shall be vested and binding on any Party' ssuccessor in interest, subject to the limitations in this MOU on assignment of this MOU.
13. 7. Severability. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision of this MOU shall not render any other provision of this MOU unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.
13. 8. Conflicts between Terms. If an apparent conflict or inconsistency exists between the main body of this MOU and any exhibit attached to this MOU, the main body of this MOU shall control. If a conflict exists between an applicable Federal, State, SJAFCA, or other law, rule, regulation, order, or code and this MOU, then the law, rule, regulation, order, or code shall control. Varying degrees of stringency among the main body of this MOU, the exhibits, and laws, rules, regulations, orders, or codes are not deemed conflicts, and the most stringent requirement shall control. Each Party shall notify the other immediately upon the identification of any apparent conflict or inconsistency concerning this MOU.
13. 9. Principles of Interpretation. No inference in favor of or against any Party shall be drawn from the fact that such Party has drafted any part of this MOU. A word, term or phrase defined in this MOU may be used in the singular, plural, past tense or future tense, regardless of how it is defined, all in accordance with ordinary principles of English grammar, which shall govern all language in this MOU.
13.0. Counterparts. This MOU may be signed in multiple counterparts, which, when taken together, shall constitute a single signed original, as though all Parties had signed the same MOU.
13.1. Headings. All headings in this MOU are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of this MOU.
13.2. Exhibits Incorporated. All exhibits referenced in this MOU are incorporated into this MOU.
13.3. Survival of Obligations. All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in accordance with this MOU, and all continuing obligations set forth in this MOU, shall survive expiration or earlier termination of this MOU.
13.4. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals preceding this MOU are true and correct and are incorporated into and made a part of this MOU.
13.5. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of each provision of this MOU, unless otherwise specified in this MOU.
1861502v2 SC409779 7
E- 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU is entered into as of the date set forth above by SJAFCA, acting by and through its Board President or designee, and by the Authority, by and through the signature of the Authority' sauthorized representative( s), all as set forth below.
SAN JOAQUIN AREA FLOOD CONTROL
AGENCY
By:
SCOTT L. SHAPIRO, Legal Counsel
MOSSDALE TRACT INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCING DISTRICT PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY
By:
CHRIS ELIAS, Executive Director
1s615o2v2 SC409779 8
E- 8
1861502v2
E- 9
Table E- 1
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated OAD and EIFD Financing Supporting Tables
Financing Revenues and Debt Service
Gross
Gross Available Gross Revenues for Assessment Net Assessment Net EIFD Revenue Assessment EIFD Project & Total Revenue EIFD Revenue Revenue for PayGo / for PayGo & Future Year Revenues Revenues Financing Debt Service for Debt Service for Debt Service Services Projects Table 1: EIFD
1 ] Revenue Analysis [ 2] [ 2]
2016 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2017 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2018 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ o $ 0 $ o $ 0
2019 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2020 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2021 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2022 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
rm 2023 $ 0 $ 925, 309 $ 925, 309 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 925, 309 0 2024 $ 0 $ 1, 872, 403 $ 1, 872, 403 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1, 872, 403 2025 $ 2,41, 378 $ 2, 676, 559 $ 4, 917,37 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,41, 378 $ 2, 676, 559 2026 $ 2,92, 929 $ 3, 627, 251 $ 5, 920, 180 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,92, 929 $ 3, 627, 251 2027 $ 2, 338, 788 $ 4, 528,03 $ 6, 867, 291 $ 1, 964, 000 $ 1, 964, 000 $ 0 $ 374, 788 $ 4, 528,03 2028 $ 2, 385, 564 $ 5, 440, 346 $ 7, 825, 910 $ 1, 964, 000 $ 1, 964, 000 $ 0 $ 421, 564 $ 5, 440, 346 2029 $ 2, 433, 275 $ 6, 308, 478 $ 8, 741,52 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 0 $ 470, 765 $ 6, 308, 478 2030 $ 2, 481, 940 $ 2, 972,91 $ 5, 454, 932 $ 1, 959,50 $ 1, 959,50 $ 0 $ 521, 990 $ 2, 972,91 2031 $ 2, 531,79 $ 3,69, 691 $ 5, 901, 270 $ 1, 960, 590 $ 1, 960, 590 $ 0 $ 570, 989 $ 3,69, 691 2032 $ 2, 582, 211 $ 3, 722, 560 $ 6, 304, 771 $ 1, 959,50 $ 1, 959,50 $ 0 $ 622, 261 $ 3, 722, 560 2033 $ 2, 633, 855 $ 2, 996, 423 $ 5, 630, 278 $ 1, 962, 300 $ 1, 962, 300 $ 0 $ 671, 555 $ 2, 996, 423 2034 $ 2, 686, 532 $ 3,07, 484 $ 5, 994, 016 $ 1, 963, 150 $ 1, 963, 150 $ 0 $ 723, 382 $ 3,07, 484 2035 $ 2, 740, 263 $ 3, 629,77 $ 6, 369, 940 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 0 $ 777,53 $ 3, 629,77 2036 $ 2, 795, 068 $ 3, 934,45 $ 6, 730, 013 $ 1, 960, 380 $ 1, 960, 380 $ 0 $ 834, 688 $ 3, 934,45 2037 $ 2, 850, 969 $ 4, 239, 345 $ 7, 090, 315 $ 1, 961, 020 $ 1, 961, 020 $ 0 $ 889, 949 $ 4, 239, 345 2038 $ 2, 907,89 $ 4, 523, 757 $ 7, 431, 746 $ 1, 964, 210 $ 1, 964, 210 $ 0 $ 943, 779 $ 4, 523, 757 2039 $ 2, 966, 149 $ 4, 785, 808 $ 7,51, 957 $ 1, 961, 230 $ 1, 961, 230 $ 0 $ 1, 004, 919 $ 4, 785, 808 2040 $ 3, 025, 471 $ 5, 054, 333 $ 8, 079, 804 $ 1, 960, 800 $ 1, 960, 800 $ 0 $ 1, 064, 671 $ 5, 054, 333 2041 $ 3, 085, 981 $ 5, 359, 024 $ 8, 445, 005 $ 1, 962, 720 $ 1, 962, 720 $ 0 $ 1,23, 261 $ 5, 359, 024 2042 $ 3, 147, 701 $ 5, 658,76 $ 8,06, 376 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 1, 962, 510 $ 0 $ 1,85,91 $ 5, 658,76 2043 $ 3, 210, 655 $ 5, 970, 000 $ 9, 180, 655 $ 1, 960, 160 $ 1, 960, 160 $ 0 $ 1, 250, 495 $ 5, 970, 000 Prepared by LWA Page 1 of 2 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Table E- 1
Mossdale Tract: 2023 Financing Plan
Updated OAD and EIFD Financing Supporting Tables
Financing Revenues and Debt Service
Gross Available
Assessment
Year Revenues
1]
Gross
EIFD
Revenues
Table 1: EIFD
Revenue Analysis
Gross
Revenues for
Project &
Financing
Total
Debt Service
Assessment
Revenue
for Debt Service
EIFD Revenue
for Debt Service
2]
Net Assessment
Revenue for PayGo /
Services
Net EIFD Revenue
for PayGo & Future
Projects
2]
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
3, 274, 868
3,40,65
3, 407, 172
3, 475, 316
3, 544, 822
3, 615, 719
3, 688, 033
3, 761,94
3, 837, 029
3, 913, 770
3, 992, 045
4, 071, 886
4, 153, 324
4, 236, 391
0 0
0 2, 981, 349
3, 127, 815
3, 279, 684
3, 437, 147
3, 599, 387
3, 766, 514
3, 939, 727
4, 119, 240
4, 304, 851
4,94,00
4, 690, 744
4, 894, 121
5, 104, 345
5, 318, 043
5,35, 970
5, 761, 485
5, 994, 845
6, 256,16
6, 468, 180
6,86, 856
6, 912, 462
7, 144, 209
7, 382, 233
7, 627, 760
7, 881, 034
8, 141, 881
8, 408, 170
8, 682, 789
8, 966, 008
9, 257, 669
9, 554, 433
5,35, 970
5, 761, 485
5, 994, 845
1, 959,50
1, 961, 660
1, 960, 800
1, 961, 660
1, 964, 000
1, 963, 360
1, 964, 000
1, 961, 440
1, 964, 210
1, 963, 360
1, 963, 150
1, 963, 360
1, 963, 790
0 0
0 0
1, 959,50
1, 961, 660
1, 960, 800
1, 961, 660
1, 964, 000
1, 963, 360
1, 964, 000
1, 961, 440
1, 964, 210
1, 963, 360
1, 963, 150
1, 963, 360
1, 963, 790
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1, 314, 918
1, 378, 705
1, 446, 372
1, 513, 656
1, 580, 822
1, 652, 359
1, 724, 033
1, 800, 354
1, 872,19
1, 950, 410
2, 028, 895
2, 108, 526
2, 189, 534
4, 236, 391
0 0
0 2, 981, 349
3, 127, 815
3, 279, 684
3, 437, 147
3, 599, 387
3, 766, 514
3, 939, 727
4, 119, 240
4, 304, 851
4,94,00
4, 690, 744
4, 894, 121
5, 104, 345
5, 318, 043
5,35, 970
5, 761, 485
5, 994, 845
Total 103, 650, 829 $159, 253,32 $262, 904, 061 $58, 866, 730 $ 58, 866, 730 0 $ 44, 784, 099 159, 253,32 1] Based on actual FY 2024/5 Assessment Levy plus an assumed 2% per year increase for consverative purposes. 2] Pay go Revenues from the EIFD are collected through 2034. The total amount of PayGo revenues needed to funding the 200 -Year Project total $ 45, 377, 677. No debt service is needed to be supported by EIFD revenues.
Prepared by LWA Page 2 of 2 1801000 Mossdale Tract Financing Plan 2024 0827. xlsx Sr, SAN JOAsWIN AREA
FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY
September 26, 2024
Mr. Chris Lief, Executive Officer
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
P. O. Box 942836
Sacramento, CA 94236
Via electronic mail: Chris. Liefacvflood. ca. 00v
ATTACHMENT
N
C
as
RE: 2023 Annual Report of Adequate Progress toward Urban Level of Flood Protection for the Mossdale Tract Area Reclamation District No. 17)
Dear Mr. Lief:
Senate Bill 5 ( SB5), and related companion bills, created a new requirement for certain land use decisions made by cities and counties in the California Central Valley. Prior to approving discretionary land use decisions for non- residential projects, and prior to approving ministerial land use decisions ( building permits) for new residential buildings in urban or urbanizing area, land use agencies are required to make a finding related to the provision of an Urban Level Flood Protection ( ULOP). Further, to ensure that these findings remain valid, the Local Flood Management Agency ( LFMA) is required to annually report to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( the Board) on the adequate progress being made toward ULOP.
As part of the reorganization of the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency ( SJAFCA) that took place in January 2018, SJAFCA assumed the role of LFMA for the Mossdale Tract Area. This is SJAFCA' ssixth year fulfilling the annual requirement to report on adequate progress toward ULOP for the Mossdale Tract Area. With this letter, SJAFCA respectfully transmits to the Board SJAFCA' sMossdale Tract Program: 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Update for ULOP Final Report dated September 3, 2024.
This report has been made publicly available and can be found on SJAFCA' swebsite at https:// www. siafca. oradrojects/ mossdale- tract
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding our progress toward achieving ULOP for the Area.
Sincerely,
is Elias
Executive Director
San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
Enclosure: Mossdale Tract Program: 2023 Annual Adequate Progress Update for ULOP Final Report, September 3, 2024 CC: Brad Taylor, City Engineer, City of Lathrop ( via e-mail) Kevin Jorgensen, City Engineer, City of Manteca ( via e-mail) Mel Lytle, Director of Municipal Utilities Department, City of Stockton ( via e-mail) Fritz Buchman, Director Public Works, San Joaquin County ( via e- mail) CE: Ir
2800 West March Lane, Suite 200, Stockton, CA 95219
209) 299- 4200 ; www. sjafca. org