RFI- 8 Can a line item be added for SF pavement restoration? A8 Bidder should visit the site and include in their unit prices the full cost for pavement restoration where specified in the Bid Item Descriptions.
RFI- 9 Please confirm, native material is acceptable in the pipe zone and all the way up to the structural section.
A- 9 Trench backfill materials shall be as specified in the City ofLathrop Public Works Design and Construction Standards, Standard Details R- 48 through R51. City Standard Detail R- 48 shall be used for bedding and backfill, and R- 51 for asphalt restoration. Pipe embedment zone shall include " Hunch" and " Shading" zones as shown in Detail R- 48. Shading Zone shall extend a minimum of 1 - ft above crown of the pipe. Pipe embedment zone shall include clean natural sand per Caltrans Standards Specification Section 19- 3. 0253B.
RFI- 10 Please confirm, services can be installed after the main has been tested and connected.
A- 10 Yes, but installation of the new main shall also be inspected and approved by Public Works/ CITY' sREPRESENTATIVE prior to making the water service line connections.
RFI- 1I Can we get additional information for Line Item 15, Disposal of Class II Spoils Revocable)?
A -1l Class II Spoils refers to " designated waste" that requires disposal at Class II Waste Management Units as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 27.
Environmental Protection. Designated waste is as defined in the California Water Subsection 13173. Generally, this waste is considered non -hazardous, but contains pollutants in concentrations that could potentially degrade water quality.
RFI- 12 Are any CMS Message Boards required? Is so, could you clarify their locations and the duration they will be used.
A 12 No CMS Message Boards are anticipated to be required for this project.
RFI- 13 In Part 2 — Bid Item Description, section 2. 9, it specifies the use of 8" PVC, C900, Class 305 pipe. Is all C- 900 water pipe main and hydrant runs DR -14 CL 305?
A 13 Yes.
RFI- 14 Are contractors expected to perform spoil analytical studies to classify trench spoils? If so, what is the required frequency for these tests? A 14 No.
RFI- 15 Are there currently any streets under moratorium? A 15 No.
175
PW 24- 12 - Addendum No. 1
RFI- 16 Which trench backfill and asphalt restoration detail should contractors utilize for this project?
A- 16 City Standard Detail R- 48 shall be used for bedding and backfill, and R- 51 for asphalt restoration.
RFI- 17 Will there be any traffic loop replacements?
A- 17 No.
RFI- 18 Are there streets that will require slurry following asphalt restoration? If so required, will the City provide contractors with a slurry schedule ofvalues? A- 18 No, slurry seal is not required following asphalt restoration.
RFI- 19 Will the City provide contractors with a striping schedule of values, ifnecessary? A- 19 No.
RFI- 20 Is all material used in the pipe embedment zones imported sand or is native material allowed? Imported sand is required in the pipe embedment zones.
A- 20 Imported sand is required in the pipe embedment zones.
RFI- 21 Is native material permitted above the pipe embedment zone, or must all trench backfill consist entirely of imported material? Native material is generally permitted.
A- 21 Native material is generally permitted as trench backfill above the pipe embedment zone with approval of the CITY REPRESENTATIVE.
RFI- 22 What is the expected start date for this project.
A- 22 This project is anticipated to start in late January to early February 2026.
RFI- 23 Clarification was requested on Bid Item No. 14, and section 2. 15 Bid Item Descriptions, which details the installation of a 1.5" Polyethylene Water Service.
The specifications indicate that contractors are to install new 1.5" water services and connect the new water service to existing meters. However, it appears that many, ifnot all, existing services are currently 1" water services and meters inside B- 12 boxes. Could you please confirm whether the intention is to utilize 1" services in lieu of 1.5" for the water services and reconnections to the existing meters?
A- 23 The intention is to install 1.5" water services and connect the new service to the existing meters.
RFI- 24 At present, there are no " W" stamps or engravings associated with the existing water services. Should contractors be responsible for engraving the " W" designation on curbs where such markings are currently absent? A- 24 No, this requirement is only applicable for new water service installations and/ or curbs.
176
PW 24- 12 - Addendum No. 1
2. The mandatory pre -bid meeting sign -in sheet is attached for reference.
3. When submitting the bid for the project, the Contractor must acknowledge receipt of the addendum.
Recommended by:
Greg G. on
Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:
Brad aylor
City ngineer
o/ 2y/ Zo2f'
Date
Date
0 177
City ofLathrop
Department ofPublic Works
209) 941- 7430
209) 941- 7449 fax
Mandatory Pre -Bid Meeting
East Lathrop Water Main and Lateral Upgrades CIP No. PW 24- 12 Thursday, October 23, 2025, 2PM
t/la3f r-, 2S
3 5
6 7
8 9
10 12 k' aIrtiOt; E
13 14
2ee ' L J
910
2. i ')r 3
S ' tritirt - gpe
ai c. sss` rw
k4
111• 44t r -
rde v. ? ct& 7
4 S.
4 \Q.
IQ 4x wit- tAY Gc,, us- r
err leerf>k
i cei. kei
T. te. ? pelf
1S 4%9i
v
11IICONWV1rat. o
wVW- ":„,..4
e5 --in^ 1411 piefre 1/-- 4-
fu y viC , cam
Soot 8 Y t
7L77 - Otto- 367q
jam SAIA4S tvo
ctaticete, t4itr
ti/
M t •e M a
sco i 4
Haft 05
tl• iS
Q. 44 2 Pac cPc, Cim .
HUZin% LoynKtCi1on
a f tp • V 3• yt, g
201- i - 01(( e
f -f i n\ eri,^ C, Y r w r2, pee
WIttire 1' i'02` tty Cohs -mitt
n+Eit KAXI - el Veley, rte/ Pro, wow: Cc n
C J Calititentni IIK
i2ei a4N-? Or?ORME. (" Or
tf 24 ' Z
IOW"( 7 a 'St l ecey 8
L _. 42SEif al* wohlit . c04
L11_. Gott— - LYIti#
N V'/ i004. J/ / 1yyw Jj 1411 4
f ` V
ayisliiily
9?1-: y' z!- o9y3
1t6 5Dav551_ r-"ie. t
2`' iV ? 9030
ri0gm 013‘ 1_
15_
16 17
18 19
20 21
z2 V. I.
23 24
26 lkviJit' c,P - _
00, Wit, 1... i ttif ____ LaV1a Aece Ain
Alr 911-)
j/uldv _ k6e. AA_
l"?.!• - C1y° t
C r4N* 1
11, ,r citr ,,,- 1 a- Nk4t- reS e lett/ i/4:6)o
Or ,ab t 0C
1. 7 LIlNA,
itzt-(Ina> ri inc.
Z- Pe_. crN. N• iGirta.. t LyzA, S''"`' 1t.
G
G6, risL CtZ C,,&- trVEi4- rt2/`-, Cow
178
SECTION 00300
EAST IATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW t412
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
BIDDER' SBOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WE LaFleur Engineering, Inc.
as PRINCIPAL, and Old Republic Surety Company
as SURETY are held; and firmly bond unto the City of Lathrop in the penal sum of TEN PERCENT ( 10%) OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE BID of the Principal above named, submitted by the Principal to the City of Lathrop for the work described below, for the payment of which sum in lawful money of the United States, well and truly to be made to the City of Lathrop to which the bid was submitted, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by those presents. In no case shall the liability of the surety hereunder exceed the sum of $ Ten Percent of Amount Bid ( 10% of Amount Bid)
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH,
THAT, WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted the above mentioned bid to the City of Lathrop for certain construction specifically described as follows, for which bids are to be opened at the City Hall, 390 Towne Centre Drive, Lathrop, CA: EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES, CIP PW 2412.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal is awarded the contract and within the time and manner required under the specifications, after the prescribed forms are presented to him for signature enters into a written contract in the prescribed form, in accordance with the bid, and files two bonds with the City, one to guarantee faithful performance, and the other to guarantee payment for labor and materials as required by law, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this of October , 20 25.
LaFleur Engineering, Inc. ( Seal)
Address: `-Y588 Bedell Ct., Unit B
Roseville, CA 95747
24th day
y
Company ( Seal)
Seal) il " t ( Seal)
Sharon Smith, Attomey- in- fact
Address: P. O. Box " 635
Milwaukee, WI 53201
NOTE: Signatures of those executing for the surety must be properly acknowledged. 00300- 6
179
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.
State of California
County of Sacramento
on October 24, 2025 before me,
R. Kailany, Notary Public
insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Sharon Smith
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( e) whose name( e) is/ aFe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they" executed the same in his/er/ their authorized capacity( iee) 7and that by We/ their her/ signature(&) on the instrument the person( s3); or the entity upon behalf of which the person( a) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Sig ( Seal)
Z COMM. HYPUBLICC• CALIFORNIA ALW
s ' - >° 2529630
1 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNW
s COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO w
I_' l '__-%
Comm. Expires AUG. 10, 2029
ra''er
180
OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, a Wisconsin stock insurance corporation, does make, constitute and appoint:
ELIZABETH COLLODI, JOHN WEBER, JESSICA MONLUX, JOHN HOPKINS, SARA WALLISER, BREANNA BOATRIGHT, DEANNA QUINTERO, BILL RAPP, TONY CLARK, MATTHEW FOSTER, JASON MARCH, SAMANTHA VVATKINS, PAULA SENNA, JENNIFER LAKMANN, MINDY W- IITEHOUSE, PHIL VVAT1 INS, BRAD ESPINOSA, KATHLEEN LE, SHARON SMITH, CASSANDRA MEDINA, STEVEN WILLIAMS, R. KAILANY of CHICO, CA its true and lawful Attorney( s)- in- Fact, with full power and authority for and on behalf of the company as surety, to execute and deliver and affix the seal of the company thereto ( if a seal is required), bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof, other than bail bonds, bank depository bonds, mortgage deficiency bonds, mortgage guaranty bonds, guarantees of installment paper and note guaranty bonds, self- insurance workers compensation bonds guaranteeing payment of benefits, or black lung bonds), as follows:
ALL WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS
and to bind OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY thereby, and all of the acts of said Attorneys - in -Fact, pursuant to these presents, are ratified and confirmed.
This appointment is made under and by authority of the board of directors at a special meeting held on February 18, 1982.
This Power of Attomey is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the board of directors of the OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY on February 18,982.
RESOLVED that, the president, any vice- president or assistant vice president, in conjunction with the secretary or any assistant secretary, may appoint attomeys- in- fact or agents with authority as defined or limited in the instrument evidencing the appointment in each case, for and on behalf of the company to execute and deliver and affix the seal of the company to bonds, undertakings, recognizances, and suretyship obligations of all kinds; and said officers may remove any such attomey- in- fact or agent and revoke any Power of Attorney previously granted to such person.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or suretyship obligation shall be valid and binding upon the Company i) when signed by the president, any vice president or assistant vice president, and attested and sealed (if a seal be required) by any secretary or assistant secretary; or
ii) when signed by the president, any vice president or assistant vice president, secretary or assistant secretary, and countersigned and sealed ( if a seal be required) by a duly authorized attomey- in- fact or agent; or iii) when duly executed and sealed ( if a seal be required) by one or more attomeys- in- fact or agents pursuant to and within the limits of the authority evidenced by the Power of Attorney issued by the company to such person or persons.
RESOLVED FURTHER that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship obligations of the company; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as though manually affixed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer, and its corporate seal to be affixed this 20th day of August 2025
OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY
Assistant Secretary
STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF WAUKESHA - SS
On this 20th day of August 2025 , personally came before me, A an Pavlic and Kevin J. Abitz , to me known to be the individuals and officers of the OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY who executed the above instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly swom, did severally depose and say: that they are the said officers of the corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the above instrument is the seal of the corporation, and that said corporate seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority of the board of directors of said corporation.
President
X041Aftt- K. B40604-
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: September 28, 2026
CERTIFICATE ( Expiration of notary' scommission does not invalidate this instrument) I, the undersigned, assistant secretary of the OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, e Wisconsin corporation, CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolutions of the board of directors set forth in the Power of Attomey, are now in force.
SU' lt;•; ,„
0, 144 -
31- 2100 y', SEAL Signed and sealed at the City of Brookfield, WI this 24th
ORSC 22262 ( 3- 06)
day of
October
Assistant Sacra
2025
INTERWEST INSURANCE SERVICES
181
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.
State of California _
County of
On 11. 3 - QooS before me,
JANELLE WILLIS, NOTARY
insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Lc(
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( s) whose name( s) is/ are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they executed the same in his/er/ their authorized capacity( ies), and that by his/er/ their signature( s) on the instrument the person( s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and offwial seal.
Signature
Jr." 61.61.611. 6611" 1"NIELLEWILIJS
COMM.* 2417593
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA 12
COUNTY OF PLACER
Seal)
182
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 2442
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
STATE OF C\
COUNTY OF
NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
ss.
k
VeOtLAZ, Or , being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he or she is SZKVRAM1) 1
of' A1 kr A. k teprty making the foregoing bid
that the bid is not lade in the interest of, or on b if of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company associated, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a c i
llusive or am bid.
Signature of:
Manager, Proj
The County of "V \ ca, CR,, r
State of C
Subscribed and sworn to ( or affirmed) before me
on this Scd day of ,N0() , 20 7, by
11 I ( Na Pe G.. , proved to
me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person( s) who appeared before me.
Seal
ident, Secretary,
Manager or Representative
JANELLE WILLIS
COMM. f 2417893
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA re
I
tip_/ COUNTY OF PLACER
zjrt; Comm .
un
SEP 2028 1
00300- 7
183
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 24- 12
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 QUESTIONNAIRE
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the Bidder shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire:
Has the Bidder, any officer of the Bidder, or any employee of the Bidder, who has a proprietary interest in the Bidder, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a
violation of law or a safety regulation?
Yes No
If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space.
PUBLIC CONTRACT SECTION 10232 STATEMENT
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10232, the Contractor hereby states under penalty of perjury, that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two year period because of the Contractor' sfailure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders the Contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board.
NOTE: The above Statement and Questionnaire are part of the Proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Statement and Questionnaire.
Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
00300- 8
184
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 24- 12
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM CERTIFICATE
The Bidder hereby certifies that Bidder is in compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order No. 11246, and all other applicable Federal and State laws and regulations relating to equal opportunity employment.
BIDDER
i:; 10. 4........."'" '''.. 1................. -
Mo. G. c LA V —L st-Z. bar+- e' S• 4ro7A--
Signature)
1, I
v4.1.- 025
Date)
Bidder' sName: LntFi. Evtz. Gi.. icv t wfC- - 0K *--tc., t 1) 4L — Address: 1' SS8 6EflEt. t C-". j
Vi J tr
12os5mt. L. , c*.- i5? 41
The above certification of the Bidder regarding its affirmative action program shall be filled out completely, signed, and submitted by each Bidder and shall be a part of the Contract Documents.)
END OF SECTION)
00300- 9
185
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 24- 12
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION
SUBMIT WITH BID
Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725. 5and 1771., all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.
See https:// www. dir. ca. gov/ Public- Works/ PublicWorks. html for additional information.
No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor' sand subcontractors' current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work.
Bidder hereby certifies that it is aware of the registration requirements set forth in Labor Code sections 1725. 5and 1771. and is currently registered as a contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations.
Name of Bidder: LPN -PLC -a, k- fG—' Etu1,36, t4 c_, .
DIR Registration Number: 10011 b92104- 1..
Bidder further acknowledges:
1. Bidder shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project.
2. Bidder shall include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725. 5and 1771. in it contract with subcontractors and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time of bid opening and maintain registration status for the duration of the project.
3. Failure to submit this form or comply with any of the above requirements may result in a
fmding that the bid is non -responsive.
Bidder' sSignature:
Bidder' s Name and Title: bFtw, Ot—i + P12 -
Firm:
Date: It (041 20t- 5
END OF DOCUMENT)
00300- 1
186
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 24- 12
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
CERTIFICATION OF DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
BIDDER CERTIFICATIONS
1. The Bidder certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug -free work place by:
A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Bidder' swork place and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition:
1. Making it a
requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the contract be given a
copy of the statement.
2. Notifying the employee in the statement that, as a condition of employment under the Contract, the employee will:
a. Abide by the terms of the statement.
b. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the work place no later than 5 calendar days after such conviction:
1) Notifying the Owner in writing within 10 calendar days after receiving notice from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.
2) Taking 1 of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice, with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of Federal and State law.
b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purpose by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
c) Notify the employee that in the event of a major accident/ incident resulting in loss of life, injury or damage to the facility, or equipment, all personnel involved shall be required to submit to 00300- 11
187
SECTION 00300
EAST LATHROP WATER MAIN AND LATERAL UPGRADES
CIP PW 24- 12
BID PROPOSAL FORMS
substance testing as soon as possible after the incident, but not more than 4 hours after the incident.
B. Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the work place.
2. The Bidder' s
policy of maintaining a drug -free work place.
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the work place.
C. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free work place through implementation of the requirements stated in this Document.
WORK LOCATIONS
1. The Bidder acknowledges that the performance of work done in connection with this Contract will occur at the location( s) listed and / or described below:
Aztec Lane, Warfield Road - full length
Julie Lane - section between O Street and Somoa Lane
Samoa Lane - section between Warfield Road and Julie Lane Bizzibe Street — section between O Street and Louise Avenue Mingo Way - section between Warfield Road and Bizzibe Street Warfield Road - section between Samoa Lane and Louise Avenue BIDDER
Signature)
Date)
to+ lz_ tn- S.
00300- 12
188
ITEM 4. 12
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH
EP NO. 2023- 153 AND 2024- 07 LOCATED AT 400
STANFORD CROSSING FROM STANFORD CROSSING
195 OWNER, LLC AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.
35 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH DAVID
SILVA, DBA SILVA LANDSCAPE
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Associated with Encroachment Permit No. 2023- 153
and 2024- 07 Located at 400 Stanford Crossing from
Stanford Crossing 195 Owner, LLC, Release of
Performance Bond, and Approve Change Order No.
35 for Landscape Maintenance with David Silva, DBA
Silva Landscape
SUMMARY:
Stanford Crossing 195 Owner, LLC ( Stanford), the developer of the improvements at 400 Stanford Crossing ( Escala), has completed the public improvements associated with Encroachment Permit No 2023- 153 (EP 23- 153) and 2024- 07 (EP 24- 07). A Vicinity Map of the improvements is included in Attachment " B".
Staff has inspected the improvements listed in Attachment " C", and the City Engineer has deemed them complete and in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. Stanford provided a one- year warranty bond based on 10% of the completed construction costs, as well as lien releases for the improvements proposed for acceptance.
Staff request City Council accept the public improvements listed in Attachment " C" and approve a change order with the City' slandscape contractor for future landscape maintenance.
BACKGROUND:
On October 5, 2006, the City approved a Vesting Tentative Map ( VTM) for Tract 3533 to create 62 parcels on 960 acres of land. The location of the improvements are the frontage of Lot 4 of Tract 3533. On August 22, 2023, the Central Lathrop Design Review Board ( CLDRB) approved the Escala at Stanford Crossing Site Plan Review No. (SPR- 23- 53). This approved construction of 195 duplex homes that range in size from 1, 340 - 1, 540 square feet, 448 parking spaces to serve the project, and a 3,07 square foot community center and leasing office.
189
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EP NO. 2023- 153 AND 2024- 07 LOCATED AT 400 STANFORD CROSSING FROM STANFORD CROSSING 195 OWNER, LLC AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 35 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE WITH DAVID SILVA, DBA SILVA LANDSCAPE
The conditions of approval associated with the entitlement of the project required the installation of frontage improvements along Stanford Crossing and Barbara Terry Boulevard, including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, and streetlights. The work was done under EP 23- 153 and EP 24- 07.
Staff has inspected the public improvements associated with EP 23- 153 and EP 24- 07, as listed in Attachment " C", and the City Engineer has deemed them complete and in compliance with the approved plans and specification.
Stanford has submitted a one- year warranty bond equal to 10% of the completed construction costs, along with lien releases for the improvements proposed for acceptance. Upon acceptance, the performance bond will be released and replaced with the warranty bond. The bonds associated with the improvements proposed for acceptance are detailed in Table 1 below:
Table 1
Description Performance Bond Warranty Bond
Number & Amount
Encroachment Permit 1001187858
23- 153 188, 400 1001199466
Encroachment Permit 1001199466 30, 255. 51
24- 07 183, 080
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has inspected the public improvements associated with EP 23- 153 and EP 24- 07 listed in the GASB 34 Reports and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Stanford has provided unconditional lien releases and a one- year maintenance bond for the completed improvements. Staff recommend that the City Council accept the public improvements listed in Attachment " C."
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City' s
maintenance costs will increase to maintain the accepted improvements.
The warranty bond will cover any repairs or replacements due to defective materials or workmanship required during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance.
The City' s Service Maintenance Capital Facilities District 2019- 02 has been established to fund City maintenance and operating costs. 190
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2O25 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EP NO. 2O23- 153 AND 2024- 07 LOCATED AT 400 STANFORD CROSSING FROM STANFORD CROSSING 195 OWNER, LLC AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 35 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE WITH DAVID SILVA, DBA SILVA LANDSCAPE
Staff is also requesting City Council adopt resolution approving Contract Change Order ( CCO) No. 35 with Dave Silva, dba Silva Landscape ( Attachment " D") to add this new landscape to future maintenance service.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Associated with Encroachment Permit No. 2023- 153 and 2024- 07 Located at 400 Stanford Crossing from Stanford Crossing 195 Owner, LLC, Release of Performance Bond, and Approve Change Order No. 35 for Landscape Maintenance with David Silva, DBA Silva Landscape
B. Vicinity Map
C. GASB 34 Reports
D. Contract Change Order No. 35 with Dave Silva dba Silva Landscape 191
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EP NO. 2024- 07 LOCATED AT 400 STANFORD CROSSING FROM STANFORD CROSSING 195 OWNER, LLC AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 35 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE WITH DAVID SILVA, DBA SILVA LANDSCAPE
APPROVALS:
12A/ Zp24
Veroica Albarran Date
Assistant Engineer
Bra Taylor
City Engineer
Cari Jam
Finance Di or
Fot&
I / 9p- i-s
Date
40/ 020N5
Date
IZ• Z• 2oZS
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
il.2•Zo26-
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
L • 1 -' L Z7
Date
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
192
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 2023- 153 AND 2024- 07 LOCATED AT 400 STANFORD CROSSING FROM STANFORD CROSSING 195 OWNER, LLC, RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE BOND, AND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 35 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
WITH DAVID SILVA, DBA SILVA LANDSCAPE
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2006, the City approved a Vesting Tentative Map VTM) for Tract 3533 to create 62 parcels on 960 acres of land. The location of the improvements are the frontage of Lot 4 of Tract 3533; and WHEREAS, on August 22, 2023, the Central Lathrop Design Review Board CLDRB) approved the Escala at Stanford Crossing Site Plan Review No. (SPR- 23- 53). This approved construction of 195 duplex homes that range in size from 1, 340 1, 540 square feet, 448 parking spaces to serve the project, and a 3,07 square foot community center and leasing office; and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval associated with the entitlement of the project required the installation of frontage improvements along Stanford Crossing and Barbara Terry Boulevard, including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, and streetlights. The work was done under Encroachment Permit No 2023- 153 (EP 23- 153) and 2024- 07 (EP 24- 07); and
WHEREAS, Stanford Crossing 195 Owner, LLC ( Stanford) has submitted a one- year warranty bond equal to 10% of the completed construction costs, along with lien releases for the improvements proposed for acceptance. Upon acceptance, the performance bond will be released and replaced with the warranty bond. The bonds associated with the improvements proposed for acceptance are detailed in Table 1 below:
Table 1
Description Performance Bond Warranty Bond
Number & Amount
Encroachment Permit 1001187858
23- 153 188, 400 1001199466
Encroachment Permit 1001199466 30, 255. 51
24- 07 183, 080
and
WHEREAS, staff has inspected the public improvements associated with EP 23- 153 and EP 24- 07 listed in the GASB 34 Reports and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer; and
193
WHEREAS, Stanford has provided unconditional lien releases and a one- year maintenance bond for the completed improvements. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the public improvements listed in Attachment " C"; and WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City' s
Service Maintenance Capital Facilities District 2019- 02 has been established to fund City maintenance and operating costs; and WHEREAS, staff request City Council approve Contract Change Order ( CCO) No. 35 with Dave Silva, dba Silva Landscape ( Attachment " D") to add this new landscape for future maintenance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements associated with EP No. 2023- 153 and 2024- 07 located at 400 Stanford Crossing from Stanford Crossing 195 Owner, LLC, and authorize staff to release the performance bond; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve Contract Change Order No. 35 with David Silva, dba Silva Landscape to add this new landscape to future maintenance services. 194
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 8th day of December 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas
City Clerk
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
195
10- 31 2025
10: 08an
Ted
Pork
25245\_ RECORD P:\
DRAWINGS \
GASR34 -
OFFSITE\ TRACT
3533 -
REGIONAL
MAP.
DWG PROJECT
SITE
196
10- 31- 2025
10: 08om
Ted
Park
25245\_ RECORD P:\
DRAWINGS\ GASB34 -
OFFSITE\ TRACT
3533-
SITE
MAP
DWG
197
City
of
Lathrop
ProjectAccepta nce
GASB 34
Report)
Submitted
By:
MacKay &
Somps -
Ted
Park
Project:
Tract
3533 -
Offsite Improvements
Tract
3533 -
Escala
@
Stanford
Crossing,
Bound
by
Barbara
Terry
Blvd,
Address:
Golden
Valley
Parkway,
and
Stanford
Crossing
SOFT
COSTS
Date:
10/ 29
Unit
Price
4 Civil Engineering (
Mackay & Somps)
5 Construction
Staking (
M
ackay &
Somps)
6, 000.0 3, 200. 00
Item
Descriptio
n
S
ubtotal: $
Unit
Qty
Unit
Price
Amount
A
Fine
Grade,
Rock
and
Pave
2 13'
AB
@
Entrance 10. 5"
3 AB
@
Vert
Curb
4 6"
AB
@
sidewalk
5 AC
Pave
5"3.
6 Fog
Seal
7 Offsite
Signage
and
Striping
SF
3, 400 $
2 .
90 $
LF
245 $
10 .
00 $
SF
2, 450 $
1 .
30 $
SF
3, 400 $
2 .
75 $
SF
3, 400 $
0 .
05 $
LS
1 $
7, 187 .
00 $
Subt
otal: $
B
Con
crete
Work
1 Vertical
Curb
and
Gutter
2 6'
Sidewalk
4 Curb
Ramps
LF
243
SF
650 2,
EA
4 48. 35 10. 9
1, 750. 00
198
Item
Description
Unit
Qty
Unit
Price
Amount Subtotal: $
C
Sanitary
Sewer
1 Connect
to
Ex
Stub
@
Barbara
Terry
EA
1 7, 500. 00 $
Subtotal: $
D
Storm
Drain Co1
nnect
to
ex
Stub
LS
1 5, 000 .
00 $
Subtotal: $
DoE
mestic
Water
1 Connect
to
8" ex
line
EA
1 800. 00 $ 14,
Subtotal: $
F
Streetlights
1 Tie
In
with
Meter
EA
2 280. 00 $ 7,
Subt
otal: $
Hard
Cost
S
ubtotal
Softcost
Total
Total $
199
City
of
Lathrop
Project
Acceptance
GASB
34Report)
Submitted
By:
MacKay &
Somps - Ted
Park
Date:
10/ 29025
Project:
Tract
3533 -
Offsite
Landscaping
Tract
3533 -
Escala
@
Stanford
Crossing,
ound B
by
Barbara
Terry
Blvd,
olden G
Valley
Parkway,
and Address:
Stanford
CrossingCOSTS
SOFT
1 Landscape
Design (
SMP) -
Design
costs
will
be
included
with
Tract
3533
acceptance
Item
LanA
dscape
Description
Unit
Price
Amount
14, 700 .
00 $
14, 700 .
00 Subtotal: $
700. 0014,
Unit
Qty
Unit
PriceAmount
1 Landscaping
B
Irrigation
LS
1 69, 135. 00
69, 135 .
00 Subtotal: $
69, 135 .
00 1
Irrigation
Sleeves
2 Irrigation
3 Irrigation
Audit
LS
1 5, 475. 00
5, 475 .
00 LS
1 80, 073.
80, 073 .
00 LS
1 1, 776 .
00 776 . 1,
00 Subt
otal: $
87, 324 .
00 F
General
1 90
day
maintenance
LS
1 $
500 .
00 $
500. 00
Subtotal: $
500 .
00 Hard
Cost
Su
btotal $
156, 99. 00
Softcost
Total $
14, 700 .
00 Total $
171, 659. 00
200
Attachment
CHANGE ORDER NO. 35
Monthly Fee
Landscape Maintenance for Escala @ Stanford Crossing Offsites City of Lathrop CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 35
MONTHLY FEE — Landscape Maintenance for Escala @ Stanford Crossing Offsites Contractor: David Silva DBA Silva Landscape
Address: PO Box 607
Patterson, CA 95363
Change Order Date
Contract Execution Date:
Notice to Proceed Date:
December 08, 2025
September 1, 2017
September 1, 2017
This contract change order augments or changes the following:
1) ADDITIONS TO CONTRACT: LANDSCAPING SERVICES COMMENCED IN MAY 2025 Pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Specifications and proposal attached as Exhibit A, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes to the plans and specifications, and scope of work contracted for within the terms of the agreement between the City of Lathrop and David Silva DBA Silva Landscape dated September 1, 2017.
CHANGES IN THE SPECIFICATIONS
A. None
II. ADDITION( S) TO CONTRACT
Monthly Fee — Landscape Maintenance for Escala @ Stanford Crossing Offsites 300/ mo.
Monthly Fee — Landscape Maintenance for Tract 3225 350/ mo.
MONTHLY FEE COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 35 ( MONTHLY FEE) 650/ mo.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT ( MONTHLY FEE) 57, 214. 00
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ( MONTHLY FEE) 13, 900. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 ( MONTHLY FEE) 985. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 ( MONTHLY FEE) 1, 850. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 ( MONTHLY FEE) 425. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 14 ( MONTHLY FEE) 3, 500. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 ( MONTHLY FEE) 8, 500. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 23 ( MONTHLY FEE) 465. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 25 ( MONTHLY FEE) 250. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 26 ( MONTHLY FEE) 825. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 27 ( MONTHLY FEE) 625. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 28 ( MONTHLY FEE) 675. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 29 ( MONTHLY FEE) 450. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 30 ( MONTHLY FEE) 3, 725. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 31 ( MONTHLY FEE) 9, 500. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 32 ( MONTHLY FEE) 1, 200. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 33 ( MONTHLY FEE) 4,50. 0 201
CHANGE ORDER NO. 35
Monthly Fee
Landscape Maintenance for Escala @ Stanford Crossing Offsites City of Lathrop TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 34 (MONTHLY FEE) 950. 00 TOTAL REVISED MONTHLY CONTRACT AMOUNT 110,39. 00
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 ( ONE TIME FEE) 14, 989. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 ( ONE TIME FEE) 22, 800. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 (ONE TIME FEE) 3, 200. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 ( ONE TIME FEE) 11, 400. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 ( ONE TIME FEE) 1, 780. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 ( ONE TIME FEE) 2,00. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 ( ONE TIME FEE) 950. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 ( ONE TIME FEE) 3, 800. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 ( ONE TIME FEE) 925. 00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 16 (ONE TIME FEE) 1, 200. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 17 ( ONE TIME FEE) 2, 400. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 18 (ONE TIME FEE) 1, 650. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 19 ( ONE TIME FEE) 2, 400. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 20 (ONE TIME FEE) 2,00. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 21 ( ONE TIME FEE) 1, 300. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANGE ORDER NO. 22 ( ONE TIME FEE) 1, 200. 0 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST FROM CHANFE ORDER NO. 24 (ONE TIME FEE) 4, 500. 0 TOTAL ONE- TIME ADDITIONS TO CONTRACT AMOUNT 78, 900. 0
END OF CHANGES)
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
See additions to contract. The contractor provided all labor, material, equipment and performed all incidental tasks as necessary to complete the change order.
TIME OF COMPLETION
To run throughout the duration of the contract.
RELEASE AND WAIVER
Acceptance of this Contract Change Order constitutes a full and final resolution of all pending disputes between City and Contractor regarding scope of work and payment for work. Contractor accepts this Contract Change Order as full payment for all work performed to date and hereafter to be performed, up to and including Contract Change Order No. 35. Contractor releases and discharges City from any and all claims, demands, damages, actions and causes of actions and causes of action for injuries, damages or losses, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, arising directly from Contractor' swork on this contract. Contractor expressly waives the provisions of California Civil Code, Section 1542, which reads as follows:
A general release does not extend to claims which the Creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.
END OF SECTION)
202
CHANGE ORDER NO. 35
Monthly Fee
Landscape Maintenance for Escala @ Stanford Crossing Offsites City of Lathrop Approved As
To Form:
Recommended
By:
Approved By:
Accepted By
Contractor:
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
City of Lathrop
Michael King
Assistant City Manager
City of Lathrop
Stephen J. Salvatore
City Manager
City of Lathrop
t ' /—ta-' zs
Date
Date
Date
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
203
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
204
ITEM 4. 13
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR THE GREEN PARK
IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 12
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Marina Landscape, Inc. for The Green
Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12 and Authorize the
Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract
Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment
Bonds
SUMMARY:
Marina Landscape, Inc. (Marina Landscape) has completed construction of The Green Park Improvements, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PK 22- 12, (Project). Staff inspected the improvements and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Marina Landscape has submitted lien releases confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full and provided a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the completed improvements constructed by Marina Landscape for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Marina Landscape of $ 25, 360 within forty-ive (45) days after recording the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On July 8, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Marina Landscape for the construction of the Project in the amount of $ 486, 891 and approved a 15% construction contingency of $73, 034, and authorized staff to spend up to that amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project. The Project scope included the installation of a new play structure, concrete walkways, fitness equipment, cornhole boards and new landscape.
Four contract change orders totaling $ 20, 312 were issued during the construction of the project; therefore, the final contract price of the Project is $ 507, 203.
Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance bond and payment bond Bond No. PB11510401458, $ 486, 891) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. PB11510401458, $ 50, 720). The one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year 205
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR THE GREEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 12
period beginning with this acceptance due to any defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Marina Landscape has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Marina Landscape has completed the Project pursuant to the contract documents dated July 8, 2024. Staff inspected the improvements and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Marina Landscape has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract amount with Marina Landscape for the Project is 507, 203.
Adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2025-6 budget to close out CIP PK 22- 12. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the original funding source, Measure C ( 1060) Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Marina Landscape, Inc. for The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12 206
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR THE GREEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 12
APPROVALS:
lea"— 2. 5 -
Steven Hollenbeak Date
Assistant Engineer
Brad Saylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja s
Financ Director
gho- kc
Date
i470/ o20
Date
it/ -to / 7e ic—
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
1'
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
1. z5• ZS
1z. 3.
Steffen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
207
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR THE GREEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 12 AND AUTHORIZE THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF CONTRACT RETENTION,
AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Marina Landscape, Inc. (Marina Landscape) for The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12 (Project) in the amount of $ 486, 891, approved a 15% construction contingency of $ 73, 034 and authorized staff to spend up to that amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consisted of installing a new play structure, concrete walkways, fitness equipment, cornhole boards and new landscape; and WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, four contract change orders for a total of $ 20, 312 were issued during construction, for a total contract price of $ 507, 203; and WHEREAS, Marina Landscape has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total Project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance bond and payment bond ( Bond No.
PB11510401458, $486, 891) will be released and replaced with the one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. PB11510401458, $ 50, 720) upon City Council' s acceptance of the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2025-6 budget for CIP PK 22- 12 to dose out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the original funding source, Measure C ( 1060) fund; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Marina Landscape for The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12; and
208
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Marina Landscape in the amount of $ 25, 360 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by Marina Landscape for The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12 pursuant to the contract documents dated July 8, 2024; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk and the release of the contract retention to Marina Landscape in the amount of 25, 360 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and authorizes the release of the performance and payment bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop approves the transfer of unused funds back to the original funding source. 209
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8th day of December 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 210
Attachment
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exemptfrom payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co - owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co -owners is fee title ( e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 8th day of December 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Marina Landscape, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO.
Marina Landscape, Inc. 3707 W. Garden Grove Blvd.
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the State of California, and is described as follows:
The Green Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 12
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY
Orange, CA
City of Lathrop
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
STATE
92868
County of San Joaquin,
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
211
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated December 8, 2025 by Marina Landscape, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on December 8, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereofby its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
212
ITEM 4. 14
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
MG AND JC CONCRETE, INC. FOR MOSSDALE
COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by MG and JC Concrete, Inc. for
Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS 25-
25, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of
Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and
Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
MG and JC Concrete, Inc. ( MG and JC Concrete), has completed construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25-5 - Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs Project). The scope of work included the removal of lifted and broken sidewalk panels and construction of new 5 feet wide sidewalk in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) standards.
City staff has inspected the work, and the City Engineer has determined that the improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. MG and JC Concrete has submitted lien releases confirming that all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full. In addition, a one- year warranty bond, equal to 10% of the construction contract amount, has been provided to ensure the continued integrity of the improvements.
Staff requests that the City Council accept the improvements completed by MG and JC Concrete for the Project. Staff also requests that Council authorize the following actions:
Filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk; and Release of contract retention totaling $ 6, 512 to MG and JC Concrete, to occur within forty-ive (45) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; and Release of the performance and payment bonds associated with the Project.
BACKGROUND:
On June 9, 2025, City Council approved a construction contract with MG and JC Concrete for construction of CIP PS 25-5. The Project included demolition and removal of damaged concrete sections and tree roots, installation of root barriers, and construction of 5 feet wide concrete sidewalk to meet ADA standards and slope requirements.
213
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MG AND JC CONCRETE, INC. FOR MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 MG and JC Concrete has completed construction of the Project. City staff conducted a final inspection, and the City Engineer has determined that all improvements were completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Staff requests City Council accept the public improvements constructed by MG and JC Concrete for the Project. Staff also requests City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to MG and JC Concrete in the amount of $ 6, 512 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 77769) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond in the amount of $ 13, 023 (Bond No. 77769). The warranty bond ensures coverage for any necessary repairs or replacements due to defective materials or workmanship discovered within one year from the date of acceptance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The awarded contract amount was $ 135, 200, and a 15% construction contingency of 20,80 was authorized, for a total construction budget of $ 155, 480.
During construction, no contract change orders were issued, resulting in a final construction cost of $ 130, 231. Sufficient funds were allocated for this Project within the approved Fiscal Year 2025-6 budget for CIP PS 25-5 to fully cover all expenses and close out the Project. Upon completion, staff requests that any unused project funds be transferred back to the Local Transportation Funds ( LTF).
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by by MG and JC Concrete, Inc. for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS 25-5, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS 25-5 214
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MG AND JC CONCRETE, INC. FOR MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 APPROVALS:
ll / Robots
Angel arca Date
Associate Engineer
BractTaylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja - s
Financ Director
Folk
ii/ 10// crDate
11/ o 51d0o5
Date
II - Z( 0 •ZoZS
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
C--") I/ • 25• Z02S
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
2 5- 't.o Z5
t?• S•2'r"
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
215
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY MG AND JC CONCRETE, INC. FOR MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5, AND
AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, THE RELEASE OF
CONTRACT RETENTION, AND THE RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, MG and JC Concrete, Inc. (MG and JC Concrete), has completed construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25-5 - Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs ( Project); and
WHEREAS, the scope of work included the removal of lifted and broken sidewalk panels and construction of new 5 feet wide sidewalk in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) standards; and
WHEREAS, City staff has inspected the work, and the City Engineer has determined that the improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, MG and JC Concrete has submitted lien releases confirming that all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full; and WHEREAS, a one- year warranty bond, equal to 10% of the construction contract amount, has been provided to ensure the continued integrity of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by MG and JC Concrete for the Project; and
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to MG and JC Concrete in the amount of $ 6, 512 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds; and
WHEREAS, upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 77769) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond in the amount of $ 13, 023 (Bond No. 77769); and WHEREAS, the warranty bond ensures coverage for any necessary repairs or replacements due to defective materials or workmanship discovered within one year from the date of acceptance; and
216
WHEREAS, the awarded contract amount was $ 135, 200, and a 15% construction contingency of $20,80 was authorized, for a total construction budget of $ 155, 480. During construction, no contract change orders were issued, resulting in a final construction cost of $ 130, 231; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds were allocated for this Project within the approved Fiscal Year 2025-6 budget for CIP PS 25-5 to fully cover all expenses and close out the Project. Upon completion, staff requests that any unused project funds be transferred back to the Local Transportation Funds ( LTF).
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements constructed by MG and JC Concrete for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS 25-5; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to MG and JC Concrete in the amount of $ 6, 512 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and release of performance and payment bonds; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City Council also authorizes the return of unused project funds into the Local Transportation Funds ( LTF). 217
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8th day of December 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney
218
Attachment
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exemptfrom payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co - owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 8th day of December 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: MG and JC Concrete, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO.
MG and JC Concrete, Inc 401 Buckeye Street
CITY STATE
Vacaville CA
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP PS 25-5 Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
219
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated December 8, 2025 by MG and JC Concrete, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on December 8, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
220
ITEM 4. 15
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: CREATE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION,
CIP GG 26-7, APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH
TANKO STREETLIGHTING INC. AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Create Citywide Streetlight LED Conversion CIP GG 26-7, Approve Service
Agreement with Tanko Streetlighting Inc. and
Approve Budget Amendment
SUMMARY:
The City' s existing High - Pressure Sodium ( HPS) streetlights are nearing the end of their service life, resulting in frequent outages, resident complaints, and public safety concerns. Currently, replacements are made reactively as light failures occur, which can take up to three months due to the long lead time for replacement fixtures.
To address these issues proactively, staff proposes converting 1, 650 HPS streetlights to long-asting, energy - efficient light emitting diode ( LED) fixtures ( Project).
Compared to HPS light fixtures, LED fixtures offer longer lifespans, lower energy use, reduced maintenance costs, and lower PG& E rates, providing both operational and energy cost savings.
As the first step, staff propose that council approve the attached proposal from Tanko Streetlighting, Inc., to conduct a streetlight study at a cost of $ 15, 750. The study will assess baseline energy use, current and future operations and maintenance costs, and calculate projected savings and return on investment. The estimated cost to replace all 1, 650 fixtures is $ 900, 00 with a payback period of 2 years and $ 6M savings in maintenance and energy costs over 20 years. The total combined cost for the study and replacements is $ 1, 000,00.
Staff request Council approve the creation of Citywide Streetlight Conversion, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 26-7, approve a Professional Services Agreement with Tanko, and approve a budget amendment transferring $ 1, 000,00 from the Measure C fund ( 1060) contingent on review from the Measure C Oversight Committee to the CIP Project fund ( 3010).
BACKGROUND:
The City' s streetlight infrastructure currently consists of approximately 2,50 city owned streetlights, of which 1, 650 (approximately 73%) are high- pressure sodium HPS) fixtures. City staff has observed a notable increase in work orders submitted by residents reporting dim or non- functioning streetlights. Just this year alone, a total of 221
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7, APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC. AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
72 work orders have been submitted specifically for streetlight issues affecting streetlights with HPS fixtures.
Currently, the City is replacing an average of six HPS streetlights with LED fixtures per month. However, procuring LED cobra head streetlights has proven cumbersome, with a typical turnaround time from purchase to delivery of approximately three months. This delay is compounded by limited manufacturer availability, as these LED fixtures are not standard " off -the -shelf" items and are subject to backorders.
Given the growing volume of streetlight complaints, delays in replacement parts, and the operational limitations of reactive maintenance, staff request Council approve the creation of CIP GG 26-7 Citywide Streetlight Conversion, approve a Service Agreement with Tanko lighting for the streetlight study and approve a budget amendment.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The City' s existing HPS streetlights are aging and frequently failing, resulting in dim or non- functioning lights that have generated numerous resident complaints and public safety concerns. Currently, replacements are made reactively, averaging six per month, and procurement of LED cobra head streetlights is delayed by long lead times and manufacturer backorders. These factors contribute to extended periods of reduced lighting in neighborhoods, increasing safety risks for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Conversion of the HPS lights to LED will improve service reliability, enhance public safety, and reduce long- term operational costs associated with streetlighting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff requests City Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 1, 000,00 from Measure C fund ( 1060) contingent on review from the Measure C Oversight Committee to the General CIP fund ( 3010) as follows:
Increase Transfer Out
1060- 9900-90- 9010
Increase Transfer In
3010- 9900- 393- 0000 GG 26-7
Increase Appropriation
3010- 8000- 420- 10 GG 26-7
1, 000,00
1, 000,00
1, 000,00
222
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7, APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC. AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Create Citywide Streetlight LED Conversion, CIP GG 26- 27, Approve Service Agreement with Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. and Approve Budget Amendment
B. Professional Service Agreement with Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. for Citywide Streetlight Conversion, CIP GG 26-7
223
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7, APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC. AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
44,
Carlos Carrillo Date
Management Analyst
Brad Taylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja - s
Finance irector
Thomas Hedegard
Deputy City Manager
FOR
f / Z / Zd
bt'r
Date
Date
i/dtljdo8.. 5
2S• ZOZ.
Date
If. 2S • Zozs
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
It•" 3.2
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
224
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO CREATE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7, APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH TANKO STREETLIGHTING INC. AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the City' s existing High -Pressure Sodium ( HPS) streetlights are nearing the end of their service life, resulting in frequent outages, resident complaints, and public safety concerns; and
WHEREAS, these factors contribute to extended periods of reduced lighting in neighborhoods, increasing safety risks for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists; and WHEREAS, staff proposes converting 1, 650 HPS streetlights to long-asting, energy - efficient light emitting diode ( LED) fixtures ( Project). Compared to HPS light fixtures, LED fixtures offer longer lifespans, lower energy use, reduced maintenance costs, and lower PG& E rates, providing both operational and energy cost savings; and
WHEREAS, as the first step, staff propose that council approve the attached proposal from Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. (Tanko to conduct a streetlight study at a cost of $ 15, 750). The study will assess baseline energy use, current and future operations and maintenance costs, and calculate projected savings and return on investment; and
WHEREAS, currently, the City is replacing an average of six HPS streetlights with LED fixtures per month. However, procuring LED cobra head streetlights has proven cumbersome, with a typical turnaround time from purchase to delivery of approximately three months; and
WHEREAS, staff request Council approve the creation of Citywide Streetlight Conversion, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 26-7, approve a Service Agreement with Tanko, and approve a budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost to replace all 1, 650 fixtures is $ 900, 00 with a payback period of 2 years and a $ 6M savings in maintenance and energy costs over 20 years. The total combined cost for the study and replacements is $ 1, 000,00; and WHEREAS, Staff requests City Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 1, 000,00 from Measure C fund ( 1060) contingent on review of Measure C Oversight Committee to the General CIP fund ( 3010) as follows:
225
Increase Transfer Out
1060- 9900-90- 9010
Increase Transfer In
3010- 9900- 393- 0000 GG 26-7
Increase Appropriation
3010- 8000- 420- 10 GG 26-7
1, 000,00
1, 000,00
1, 000,00
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve the creation of Citywide Streetlight LED Conversion CIP GG 26- 27, approve a Services Agreement with Tanko Lighting for a cost of $ 15, 750 to provide streetlight study and approve a budget amendment as detailed above. 226
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8th day of December 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 227
Attachment
It Q IN
CITY OF LATHROP
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
TO PROVIDE A STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for convenience this 8th day of December 2025 is by and between the City of Lathrop, a California municipal corporation (" CITY"), and Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. ("CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform Professional Engineering Consulting Services, which are required by this agreement; and WHEREAS, CITY selected the CONSULTANT pursuant to said qualifications; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing to render a Streetlight Study, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, CONSULTANT and the CITY agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1) Scope of Service
CONSULTANT agrees to perform a Streetlight Study in accordance with the scope of work and fee proposal provided by CONSULTANT, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and incorporated herein by reference. CONSULTANT represents it is prepared to and can diligently perform these services in accordance with the upmost standards of its profession and to CITY' Ssatisfaction. The fee proposal shall include all reimbursable costs required for the performance of the Scope of Services. Payment of additional reimbursable costs considered to be over and above those inherent in the original Scope of Services shall be approved of in advance and in writing, by the CITY.
2) Compensation
CITY hereby agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed $ 15, 750 for the Streetlight Study set forth in Exhibit "A". CONSULTANT shall be paid any uncontested sum due and payable within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of billings containing all information pursuant to Paragraph 5 below. Compensation for any task must be equal to or less than the percentage of task complete. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to compensation for work not included in Exhibit " A", unless a written change order or authorization describing the extra work and payment terms has been executed by CITY' s authorized representative prior to the commencement of the work. Payment is made based on a time and materials basis.
228
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 3) Effective Date and Term
The effective date of this Agreement is December 8, 2025, and it shall terminate no later than June 30, 2026.
4) Independent Contractor Status
It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that CONSULTANT, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the CITY. As an independent contractor, CONSULTANT is responsible for controlling the means and methods to complete the scope of work described in Exhibit "A" to City' ssatisfaction. CONSULTANT expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that CONSULTANT is an employee of the CITY.
5) Billings
CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for completed work on a monthly basis, or as otherwise agreed, providing without limitation, details as to amount of hours, individual performing said work, hourly rate, and indicating to what aspect of the Scope of Services said work is attributable. CONSULTANT' Sbills shall include a list of all tasks, a total amount due, the amounts previously billed, and the net amount due on the invoice. Except as specifically authorized by CITY, CONSULTANT shall not bill CITY for duplicate services performed by more than one person. In no event shall CONSULTANT submit any billing for an amount in excess of the rates or the maximum amount of compensation provided in section ( 2) for either task or for the entire Agreement, unless modified by a properly executed change order.
6) Advice and Status Reporting
CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with timely reports, orally or in writing, of all significant developments arising during performance of its services hereunder, and shall furnish to CITY such information as is necessary to enable CITY to monitor the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY such reports, diagrams, drawings and other work products developed pursuant to the Scope of Services.
7) Auditing
CITY reserves the right to periodically audit all charges made by CONSULTANT to CITY for services under this Agreement. Upon request, CONSULTANT agrees to furnish CITY, or a designated representative, with necessary information and assistance needed to conduct such an audit. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY or its delegate will have the right to review, obtain and copy all records pertaining to performance of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY or its delegate with any relevant information requested and shall permit CITY or its delegate access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with the requirement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three ( 3) years after final payment under this agreement.
Page
2292of11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 8) Assignment of Personnel
CONSULTANT acknowledges that the CITY has relied on CONSULTANT' s capabilities
and on the qualifications of CONSULTANT' sprincipals and staff as identified in its proposal to CITY. The services shall be performed by, or under the direct supervision, of CONSULTANT' sAuthorized Representative: Jason Tanko, Chief Executive Officer.
CITY shall be notified by CONSULTANT of any change of its Authorized Representative, and CITY is granted the right of approval of all original, additional, and replacement personnel at CITY' ssole discretion, and shall be notified by CONSULTANT of any changes of CONSULTANT' sproject staff prior to any change. CONSULTANT shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. If CITY asks CONSULTANT to remove a person assigned to the work called for under this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to do so immediately, without requiring the City to process a reason or explanation for its request.
9) Assignment and Subcontracting
It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of CONSULTANT. Neither this Agreement nor any interest therein may be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of CITY' Sauthorized representative.
CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the CITY' Sauthorized representative. 10) Insurance
On or before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT, at its own cost and expense, shall carry, maintain for the duration of the Agreement, and provide proof thereof that is acceptable to the CITY the insurance specified in subsections ( i) through ( c) below with insurers and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects to the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all insurance required of the CONSULTANT has also been obtained for the subcontractor. Verification of this insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution. a) Workers' Compensation. CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT' Ssole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by CONSULTANT. Said Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than one million dollars ($ 1, 000,0) each accident or disease. In the alternative, CONSULTANT may rely on a selfinsurance program to meet these requirements provided that the program of self- insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. The insurer, if insurance is provided, or the CONSULTANT, if a program of self- insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement.
Page
230
3 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 b) Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general liability insurance for the period covered by this Agreement in an amount not less than two million dollars ($ 2, 000,0) per occurrence, four million dollars ($ 4, 000,0) general aggregate, and two million dollars 2, 000,0) products and completed operations aggregate for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. The general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 00 01.
Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy:
i) CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the following:
liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT, including the insider' s general supervision of CONSULTANT; ongoing and products and completed operations of CONSULTANT; premises owned, occupied or used by
CONSULTANT. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
ii) The insurance shall cover on an occurrence basis, and not on a claim made basis.
iii) An endorsement must state that coverage is primary insurance and that no other insurance affected by the CITY will be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage.
iv) Coverage shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
v) Any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to CITY and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
vi) Insurance is to be placed with California -admitted insurers with a Best' srating of no less than A: VII.
vii) Notice of cancellation or non -renewal must be received by CITY at least thirty days prior to such change.
Page
2314 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 c) Automobile Liability Insurance.
CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain automobile liability insurance for the period covered by this Agreement in an amount not less than two million dollars ($ 2, 000,0) each accident, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from the use of owned and non -owned automobiles under this Agreement.
Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 ( ed. 12/ 90) Code 1 ( any auto).
Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy:
i) CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds.
ii) Insurance is to be placed with California - admitted insurers with a Best' srating of no less than A: VII.
iii) Notice of cancellation or non -renewal must be received by CITY at least thirty days prior to such change.
d) Professional Liability. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars 2, 000,0) per claim made and per policy aggregate covering the licensed professionals' errors and omissions, as follows:
i) Any deductible or self -insured retention shall not exceed $ 150, 00 per claim.
ii) Notice of cancellation, material change, or non - renewal must be received by the CITY at least thirty days prior to such change shall be included in the coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy.
iii) The policy must contain a cross liability or severability of interest clause.
iv) The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverages are written on a claims made form:
1. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement.
Page
2325 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially
available at reasonable rates.
3. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT
must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five years after completion of the Agreement or the work.
The CITY shall have the right to exercise at the
CONSULTANT' Scost, any extended reporting provisions of the policy should the CONSULTANT cancel or not renew
the coverage.
4. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be
submitted to the CITY prior to the commencement of any
work under this Agreement.
e) Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. CONSULTANT shall disclose the self -insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. During the period covered by this Agreement, upon express written authorization of the CITY' s authorized representative, CONSULTANT may increase such deductibles or self -insured retentions with respect to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The CITY' sauthorized representative may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self -insured retention levels upon a requirement that CONSULTANT procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them.
f)
g)
Notice of Reduction in Coverage. In the event that any coverage required under subsections ( a), (b), (c), or ( d) of this section of the Agreement is reduced, limited, or materially affected in any other manner, earliest
CONSULTANT
possible
shall
opportunity
provide written
and in
notice
no case
to CITY
later than
at CONSULTANT' S
five days after
CONSULTANT is notified of the change in coverage.
In addition to any other remedies CITY may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY may, at its sole option:
i) Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
ii) Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment which becomes due to CONSULTANT
hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof;
Page
2336 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 iii) Terminate this Agreement.
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT' Sbreach.
11) Indemnification - CONSULTANT' SResponsibility
As to the CONSULTANT' S work hereunder, it is understood and agreed that ( a) CONSULTANT has the professional skills necessary to perform the work, (b) CITY relies upon the professional skills of CONSULTANT to perform the work in a skillful and professional manner, and ( c) CONSULTANT thus agrees to so perform.
Acceptance by CITY of the work performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of said CONSULTANT from such professional responsibility for the work performed. It is further understood and agreed that CONSULTANT is apprised of the scope of the work to be performed under this Agreement and CONSULTANT agrees that said work can and shall be performed in a fully competent manner in accordance with the standard of care applicable to CONSULTANT' Sprofession.
CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against any and all liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of CONSULTANT, its employees, subcontractors, or agents, or on account of the performance or character of this work, except for any such claim arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
It is understood that the duty of CONSULTANT to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve CONSULTANT from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause.
This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.
12) Licenses
If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by federal or state law, CONSULTANT warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and CONSULTANT shall keep it in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and that any applicable bond has been posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
13) Business Licenses
CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain a CITY of Lathrop Business License until all Agreement services are rendered and accepted by the CITY.
Page
2347 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 14) Termination
Either CITY or CONSULTANT may cancel this Agreement upon 30 days written notification to the other party. Upon termination, or completion of services under this Agreement, all information collected, work product and documents shall be delivered by CONSULTANT to CITY within ten ( 10) calendar days.
15) Funding
CONSULTANT agrees and understands that renewal of this agreement in subsequent years is contingent upon action by the City Council consistent with the appropriations limits of Article XIII ( B) of the California Constitution and that the Council may determine not to fund this agreement in subsequent years.
16) Notices
All contracts, appointments, approvals, authorizations, claims, demands, Change Orders, consents, designations, notices, offers, requests and statements given by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party if ( 1) personally served, (2) sent by the United States mail, postage prepaid, (3) sent by private express delivery service, or (4) in the case of a facsimile transmission, if sent to the telephone FAX number set forth below during regular business hours of the receiving party and followed with two ( 2) Days by delivery of a hard copy of the material sent by facsimile transmission. Personal service shall include, without limitation, service by delivery and service by facsimile transmission.
To City:
Copy to:
To Consultant:
17) Miscellaneous
City of Lathrop
City Clerk
390 Towne Centre
Lathrop, CA 95330
City of Lathrop
Department of Public Works
390 Towne Centre
Lathrop, CA 95330
MAIN: ( 209) 941- 7430
FAX: ( 209) 941- 7449
Jason Tanko
220 Bayshore Boulevard
San Francisco, CA 94124
415- 622- 8509
a) Consent. Whenever in this Agreement the approval or consent of a party is required, such approval or consent shall be in writing and shall be executed by a person having the express authority to grant such approval or consent. b) Contract Terms Prevail. All exhibits and this Agreement are intended to be Page
2358 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 construed as a single document. Should any inconsistency occur between the specific terms of this Agreement and attached exhibits, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
c) Controlling Law. The parties agree that this Agreement shall be governed and construed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of California. d) Definitions. The definitions and terms are as defined in these specifications. e) Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default on account of any delay or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement, which directly results from an Act of God or an act of a superior governmental authority. f) Headings. The paragraph headings are not a part of this Agreement and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of this Agreement. g) Incorporation of Documents. All documents constituting the Agreement documents described in Section 1 hereof and all documents which may, from time to time, be referred to in any duly executed amendment hereto are by such reference incorporated in the Agreement and shall be deemed to be part of this Agreement.
h) Integration. This Agreement and any amendments hereto between the parties constitute the entire Agreement between the parties concerning the Project and Work, and there are no other prior oral or written agreements between the parties that are not incorporated in this Agreement.
i)
j)
Modification of Agreement. This Agreement shall not be modified or be binding upon the parties unless such modification is agreed to in writing and signed by the parties.
Ownership of Documents. All documents, photographs, reports, analyses, audits, computer media, or other material documents or data, and working papers, whether or not in final form, which have been obtained or prepared under this Agreement, shall be deemed the property of the CITY. Upon CITY' srequest, CONSULTANT shall allow CITY to inspect all such documents during the CONSULTANT' sregular business hours.
k) Provision. Any agreement, covenant, condition, clause, qualification, restriction, reservation, term or other stipulation in the Agreement shall define or otherwise control, establish or limit the performance required or permitted or to be required of or permitted by either party. All provisions, whether covenants or conditions, shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions.
I) Severability. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this agreement. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is void or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.
m) Status of CONSULTANT. In the exercise of rights and obligations under this Page
2369 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 Agreement, CONSULTANT acts as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any rights and benefits accorded or accruing to the City Council members, officers or employees of CITY, and CONSULTANT expressly waives any and all claims to such right and benefits.
n) Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall apply to and bind, the successors and assigns of the parties. o) Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each of its provisions. In the calculation of time hereunder, the time in which an act is to be performed shall be computed by excluding the first Day and including the last. If the time in which an act is to be performed falls on a Saturday, Sunday or any Day observed as a legal holiday by CITY, the time for performance shall be extended to the following Business Day.
p)
q)
Venue. In the event that suit is brought by either party hereunder, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of San Joaquin or in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
Recovery of Costs. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement or arising out of this Agreement may recover its reasonable costs, including reasonable attorney' sfees, incurred or expended in connection with such action against the non -prevailing party.
18) Notice to Proceed
Prior to commencing work under this agreement, CONSULTANT shall receive a written Notice to Proceed" from CITY. A Notice to Proceed shall not be issued until all necessary bonds and insurances have been received. City shall not be obligated to pay CONSULTANT for any services prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed. 19) Signatures
The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the CONSULTANT and the CITY. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
Page
23710 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC.
STREETLIGHT STUDY FOR THE CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT LED CONVERSION, CIP GG 26-7 Approved as to Form:
Recommended for Approval:
Approved by:
Resolution No. 25 -
Consultant:
City of Lathrop
City Attorney
Salvador Navarrete
City of Lathrop
City Engineer
l -L- )-'-o7 5
Date
Brad Taylor Date
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
Tanko Streetlighting Inc.
220 Bayshore Boulevard
San Francisco, CA
Federal ID #
Lathrop Business License #
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Page
23811 of 11
EXHIBIT " 4- "
PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF LATHROP, CA
FOR
STREETLIGHT STUDY
TankoLighting
239
CITY OF LATHROP, CA I STREETLIGHT STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter 3
Company Profile 4
Scope of Services 5
Task 1: Streetlight Study 6
Pricing 6
Appendices 6
Appendix A — Projects List 6
TankoLighting www. tankolighting. com i 220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 Page 2 of 6 240
CITY OF LATHROP, CA I STREETLIGHT STUDY
COVER LETTER
October 22, 2025
Carlos Carrillo
Management Analyst
City of Lathrop
ccarrillo@ci. Iathrop. ca. us
Dear Mr. Carrillo,
Tanko Streetlighting, Inc. ("Tanko Lighting") appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal for a Streetlight Study to the City of Lathrop.
Tanko Lighting is the only nationwide firm focused solely on providing professional services for turn -key municipal streetlight energy efficiency and ownership projects. Our experience has been developed from more than 300 contracts in 31 states - with 55 utilities, representing more than 984, 000 streetlight fixtures.
Given Tanko Lighting' sextensive involvement with municipal streetlight acquisition and LED conversion projects nationwide, our team can leverage its expertise to provide the necessary context and value to assist the City with all the support, recommendations and coordination necessary to ensure the success of this project.
Please let us know should you have any questions. We look forward to your feedback.
Regards,
Jason Tanko
Chief Executive Officer
Enclosures
TankoLighting www. tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 Page 3 of 6 241
CITY OF LATHROP, CA I STREETLIGHT STUDY
COMPANY PROFILE
Our History: For more than 20 years — since 2003, Tanko Lighting has assisted municipalities with their streetlighting needs and is a national firm solely focused on providing professional services for turn -key
municipal streetlighting projects. In our early days, we focused on re -manufacturing High Pressure Sodium
HPS) fixtures, providing a cost- effective waste
diversion strategy by rebuilding existing fixtures to be re -deployed back into the field. This kept costs low
and was a better option for clients than buying new
streetlights. However, with the advent of Light
Emitting Diode ( LED) technology, we realized that we
could no longer compete with commodity -priced and
energy efficient LED streetlight fixtures. Thus, in 2011, we shifted our business model to focus on services to help municipalities comprehensively upgrade their streetlight energy efficient and municipal -owned options.
Our project in Centennial, CO.
Tanko Lighting' s... vast experience with technical
aspects of streetlight infrastructure [ has] been
incredibly helpful. The City has especially
appreciated Tanko' s
guidance, ability to augment
the City' s existing resources and their professionalism while working alongside City staff,"
Eric Eddy
Assistant City Manager
City of Centennial, CO
systems to the most
Our Qualifications: As a municipal streetlighting expert, Tanko Lighting is uniquely qualified to assist the City with this project. Our firm holds electrical contractor licenses in the States of California and Arizona. Additionally, our firm is a Certified Contractor by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Division of Capital Management and Maintenance ( DCAMM), a Qualified Vendor with the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, a registered Energy Services Company ( ESCO) with the United States Department of Energy, and a registered Small Business Entity with
the Small Business Administration. Please find several elements demonstrating our firm' s capabilities to accomplish this project below:
Municipal Streetlight Experience: We are solely dedicated to municipal streetlighting projects — with an entire staff exclusively focused on such projects. As such, we have a large portfolio of active municipal streetlight projects, have previously been or are currently involved with more than 984, 000 streetlights throughout the nation, and are actively developing projects for an additional 550, 00+ streetlight fixtures. Additionally, our work spans more than thirtyone states, and fifty-ive utilities. Our company' ssole focus on streetlighting distinguishes it from others, which focus on diverse measures and renders them generalists, while we are streetlight specialists. Finally, our expertise has been forged by diverse project types — including various sized projects ( ranging from as large as 100, 00+ fixtures to as few as 49 fixtures), as well as incredibly complex projects, derived from such factors as square mileage/ area, complicated data, inconsistent existing design, and complex scopes of work.
Technical Knowledge: Tanko Lighting has significant technical expertise centered on municipal streetlighting infrastructure. Led by an electrical engineer and licensed electrical contractor, Jason Tanko ( Chief Executive Officer), our team understands the field conditions and system constraints that are often involved with municipal streetlighting projects. This enables the team to accurately design projects to prevent anticipated challenges, as well as quickly respond with streamlined solutions in the event of technical difficulties during a project.
Experience with Ownership Projects: There is a growing nationwide industry trend in which municipalities are acquiring their streetlight infrastructure from their local private utility companies. This poses tremendous advantages to the municipality, in that not only does it allow the municipality to control the management of the system within its geographic borders, but it also involves tremendous cost savings — particularly related to maintenance and energy TankoLighting www. tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 Page 4 of 6 242
CITY OF LATHROP, CA STREETLIGHT STUDY
as many utilities charge exorbitant fees for energy
and maintenance rates for the systems). Further,
once a municipality purchases its system, it can reap
additional savings benefits by converting them to
LED fixtures. Tanko Lighting has been working with
several municipalities nationwide to assist in their
streetlight ownership strategies from investor -
owned utilities. Our team' s experience with
ownership projects includes providing valuation,
field data collection, ownership feasibility analysis,
and ownership negotiations with the utility on behalf
of the client. A list of our projects involving
ownership support includes the municipalities
outlined in the table to the right.
Financial Analysis: Tanko Lighting has conducted
hundreds of financial analyses for public agencies
nationwide, representing thousands of fixtures, to
ascertain the value of converting to energy efficient
streetlight systems. Leveraging our team' s vast
industry knowledge to accurately estimate relevant
costs and savings to provide the most accurate
energy and CO2 savings estimates and integrating
the information into the implementation phase of a
project is one of our company' score competencies.
Our Successes: Our success lies in our unique passion for streetlighting, which translates into a drive to ensure that projects are successfully completed. We are tremendously aware that client satisfaction is essential to our success. Thus, we strive to make every client an enthusiastic reference for future work. Clients are receptive to this drive, to the point that they frequently recommend us to other municipalities. Please find more detailed information on our projects in Appendix A. References can be provided upon request. A few of our major successes include:
Tanko' sUtility
Utili
Owned Streetlight Acquisition
of Projects
Projects
of Streetlights
Ameren ( MO) 2 6,13
American Electric Power ( OH)
Centerpoint Energy (TX)
1 1,00
1 175, 000
Duke Energy ( OH)
Eversource ( CT, MA)
1 18, 000
31 48, 024
Emera ( ME)
Entergy ( AR)
First Energy ( OH)
Georgia Power ( GA)
The Illuminating Company
OH)
2 840
1 16
1 t000
1 10, 000
1 2, 497
National Grid ( NY, MA)
New York State Electric &
Gas( NY)
43 103,56
2 6, 889
Northwest Edison ( MT)
Oncor Electric (TX)
Pacific Gas & Electric ( CA)
Poudre Valley ( CO)
Puget Sound Energy ( WA)
San Diego Gas & Electric
CA)
Seattle City Light ( WA)
Southern California Edison
CA)
United Power (CO)
Xcel Energy ( CO)
Total
1 6, 000
4 11, 238
2 1, 745
1 1, 229
1 741
1 532
1 392
23 116, 511
1 915
6 128
21, 313
533, 751
City of Berkeley, CA: A turn -key project for the City of Berkeley, CA, which involved the LED conversion of not only 7, 000 cobra head fixtures ( for which Tanko Lighting provided design recommendations with tremendous savings), but also 1,00 decorative fixtures ( which involved twenty different types of decorative fixtures for which we recommended LED retrofit kits) — which saved the City approximately $500, 00 in costs.
City of Oakland, CA: A project for the City of Oakland, CA, which involved the LED conversion of 38, 000 fixtures. Tanko Lighting was initially involved with the original team, orchestrating the strategy and project management approach for the awarded contractor. However, when the prime contractor defaulted on the project, its surety company hired our firm directly to clean up the mistakes, and re -audit, label, and data reconcile the entire City' sstreetlight system.
This resulted in the successful completion of the project and helped to settle the City' s bond claims.
City of Modesto, CA: A turn -key project for the City of Modesto, CA, which involved the LED conversion of 9, 800 cobra head fixtures. Tanko Lighting successfully convinced the City to segment the streetlight measure from a larger project
with an Energy Services Company ( ESCO) involving multiple measures in a Standard Performance Contract. This shift enabled the City to save $ 2. million in costs and expedite the LED conversion, such that the energy savings were more rapidly achieved.
TankoLighting www. tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 254. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 Page 5 of 6 243
CITY OF LATHROP, CA I STREETLIGHT STUDY
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Streetlight Study
We recognize that the City is interested in the potential idea of owning and maintaining the streetlight fixtures in the City currently owned by the utility (LS -1 rate), as well as converting the existing City -owned streetlights ( LS - 2 rate) to LED fixtures and exploring streetlight controls options. To be clear on the feasibility and financial benefit of the options, an initial analysis is recommended. With our extensive knowledge and experience, we propose providing the City with a Streetlight Study Report that will include:
Baseline energy use, energy cost and operations and maintenance costs Estimated future operations and maintenance costs
Budgetary ownership costs
Calculation of estimated savings, Return on Investment, and simple payback Estimated twenty- year projected savings and cash flows Recommendations of 2 — 3 brands of controls products, along with estimated budgetary costs/ benefits Description of assumptions included in the analysis
Once we complete the study, upon request, we will develop a presentation outlining highlights of the report and present ( in person) at a City Council meeting.
Deliverables
Streetlight Study: A report outlining the City' sstreetlight system options, cost/ benefits, assumptions, budgetary pricing, savings, cash flows, and an overall assessment of the potential feasibility of streetlight ownership and maintenance for the existing utility -owned fixtures ( LS - 1 rate), as well as LED conversion of the existing City -owned fixtures ( LS -2 rate), and controls options.
Council Presentation ( Optional): A presentation of the report' s highlights presented ( in person) at a City Council meeting.
PRICING
Please note that this pricing is valid for sixty (60) days from the date of this proposal.
Task 1: Streetlight Study
Costs for City Council Presentation
OPTIONAL)
15, 750
2, 500
Proposed Payment Terms
Tanko Lighting will invoice the City monthly, based on the percentage completed each month.
The City shall pay Tanko within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice.
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Projects List
TankoLighting www. tankolighting. com l 220 Bayshore Blvd i San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 Page 6 of 6 244
TankoLighting
Washington
Oregon
California
State.-
Alabama
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Maine
Michigan
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Ohio
Oregon
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Washington
Nevada
Idaho
Arizona
Project Count
1 1
1 103
16 49
2 2
1 3
1 2
4 58
2 1
2 1
4 2
4 1
1 6
6 1
2 15
7 1
10 National Experience
Montana
Colorado
New Mexico
Hawaii
2, 557
16 40, 000
348,32
32, 268
63, 141
4, 966
12, 311
3, 500
320
1, 800
9, 085
12, 713
85, 047
840
3,00
6,13
6, 000
4, 343
1,00
803
9, 300
535
43, 808
41, 678
1, 019
3,49
220, 959
5, 870
14 18, 715
Nebraska
Texas
Louisiana
Alabama
Georgia
Florida
Appendix A
New Hampshire
Vermont
New York
Michigan
Massachusetts
Connecticut
New Jersey
Maryland
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 245
TankoLighting
Municipality
Gulf Shores, AL
Municipality
Gilbert, AR
Municipality
Mesa, AZ
City
Type
Town
Alabama
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 2, 557
ount
2, 557
oft
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Arkansas
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 16
fixture Count
16 Arizona
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 16
Pe Fixture Count
City 40, 000
Ownership Support
of Work
Development of Street Light Master Plan
California
Contracts Total: 103 Total Fixtures: 348,32
lunicipality Type Fixture Count Scope of Work
Alameda, CA Municipal Utility 3, 200
Antioch, CA ( Project 1)
Antioch, CA ( Project 2)
Bakersfield, CA
Baldwin Park, CA
Bell, CA ( Project 1)
Bell, CA ( Project 2)
Berkeley, CA ( Project 1)
Berkeley, CA ( Project 2)
Berkeley, CA ( Project 3)
California Eminent Domain
Law Group
Campbell, CA
Capitols, CA
Chino Hills, CA ( Project 1)
Chino Hills, CA ( Project 2)
Chino Hills, CA ( Project 3)
Chino Hills, CA ( Project 4)
Chino Hills, CA ( Project 5)
Chino Hills, CA (Project 6)
Chula Vista, CA
Claremont, CA
Clearlake, CA ( Project 1)
Clearlake, CA ( Project 2)
Clovis, CA
Coalinga, CA ( Project 1)
Coalinga, CA ( Project 2)
Corona, CA
Corte Madera, CA
Cupertino, CA ( Project 1)
Cupertino, CA ( Project 2)
El Cajon, CA
Fairfield, CA
Fresno, CA
Fullerton, CA
Glendora, CA
Goleta, CA ( Project 1)
Goleta, CA ( Project 2)
Goleta, CA ( Project 3)
Hayward, CA
Imperial Beach, CA ( Project 1)
Imperial Beach, CA ( Project 2)
Inglewood, CA
La Puente, CA ( Project 1)
La Puente, CA ( Project 2)
La Verne, CA
Larkspur, CA
City
City
City
City
City
Law Firm
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Town
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Town
9,24
3, 000
450
1, 600
8, 000
3, 200
Appendix A
Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Design
Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Photometric Study Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey Decorative LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Pole Inspection & Conditions Assessment
Streetlighting Master Plan
9,00 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Streetlight System Analysis, & Municipal Process Support 75 Streetlight Replacement Design
1, 500 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
4,50 Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
1, 200 Ownership Support
929 Citywide Parks & Walkways LED Conversion & Pole Tagging Maintenance Services
Community Center & Tennis Court LED Conversion
100 Streetlight Replacement Design
1, 300 Turnkey LED Conversion
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Audit & Data Reconciliation
9, 400 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
750 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Ownership Support
8, 700 Material Procurement, Installation ( Fixtures & Controls), & Rebate/ Rte Change 819 Turnkey LED Conversion
3, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
374 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1,00 Streetlight Replacement Design
8, 000 Streetlight Replacement Design
360 LED Streetlight Material & Install
6,00 Turnkey LED Conversion
2, 500 Ownership Support
Turnkey LED Conversion & Maintenance Services
1, 575 Maintenance Services
Maintenance Services
7,00 Turnkey LED Conversion
1, 010 Audit & Data Reconciliation
532 Ownership Support
100 Streetlight Replacement Design
2, 100 Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
2, 500 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, & Ownership Support 770 Turnkey LED Conversion
262
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 246
TankoLighting
Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory ( Project 1)
Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory (Project 2)
Lodi, CA
Lompoc, CA
Modesto, CA
Monrovia, CA
Morgan Hill, CA
Mountain View, CA
Napa, CA
Oakland, CA (Project 1)
Oakland, CA (Project 2)
Oakley, CA
Orange, CA
Pasadena, CA
Paso Robles, CA ( Project 1)
Paso Robles, CA ( Project 2)
Paso Robles, CA ( Project 3)
Pico Rivera, CA ( Project 1)
Pico Rivera, CA (Project 2)
Pico Rivera, CA ( Project 3)
Pico Rivera, CA ( Project 4)
Pleasanton, CA
Poway, CA
Presidio of Monterey, CA
Rancho Cordova, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Project 1)
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Project 2)
Redlands, CA
San Bruno, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Joaquin County, CA
San Rafael, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clarita, CA ( Project 1)
Santa Clarita, CA ( Project 2)
Santa Clarita, CA ( Project 3)
Santa Cruz, CA
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Signal Hill, CA
5imi Valley, CA ( Project 1)
Simi Valley, CA ( Project 2)
Sonoma, CA
Stanton, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Temecula, CA
Thousand Oaks, CA
Tustin, CA ( Project 1)
Tustin, CA ( Project 2)
Twentynine Palms, CA
Project 1)
Twentynine Palms, CA
Project 2)
Vacaville, CA
Vallejo, CA
Ventura, CA
Vista, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Lab
Municipal Utility
City
Municipal Utility
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Federal Park
City
City
City
City
City
County
City
City
Municipal Utility
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Appendix A
California ( Continued)
Contracts Total: 103 Total Fixtures: 348,32
1, 400 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Specifications Development, & Controls Installation ( 30 fixtures) 300 Exterior Fixture LED Conversion & Controls Installation 7, 200 Turnkey LED Conversion
200 Streetlight Replacement Design
9, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
35 Pilot - Streetlight LED Conversion
2, 500 Turnkey LED Conversion
4, 206 Design Assistance & LED Replacement Streetlight Fixtures 4, 500 Turnkey LED Conversion
37, 000 Audit, Commissioning, & Data Reconciliation
526 Turnkey LED Conversion
3,95 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
4,00 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1, 350 Streetlight Replacement Design
557 Downtown Streetlight Master Plan
Streetlight Audit & Data Reconciliation
2, 630 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
1,00 Ownership Support
Maintenance Services
4,00 Inventory Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Project Management Services 3, 600 Turnkey LED Conversion
500 Streetlight Replacement Design
6500 Turnkey LED Conversion
4, 500
15, 000
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
5,77 Turnkey LED Conversion
2, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
400 Streetlight Replacement Design
3, 694 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Field Condition Report, & Design 813 Turnkey LED Conversion
11500 Audit, Design, Data Reconciliation, & Ownership Support 3, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
Pole Inspection, Turnkey LED Conversion
22, 936 Maintenance Services
Maintenance Support Services & Streetlight Master Plan
995 Ownership Support
6, 500 LED Pilot Installation, Financial, & Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis 1, 300 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, & Ownership Support 8, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
7, 202 Maintenance Services
1, 200 Turnkey LED Conversion
1, 300 Turnkey LED Conversion
7, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
550 Streetlight Replacement Design
7, 900 Ownership Support & Smart City Feasibility Analysis 3, 500 Turnkey LED Conversion
500 Ownership Support
616
168
Audit & Data Reconciliation
Sports Lighting LED Conversion
3, 980 Inventory Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Design Services 9, 000 Turnkey LED Conversion
9, 000 Ownership Support
2, 300 Turnkey LED Conversion
3, 122 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Audit, Data Reconciliation, Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, Pilot Installations, Distribution Pole Ownership Assistance, & Maintenance Services
2, 500
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 247
TankoLighting
Colorado
Contracts Total: 16 Total Fixtures: 32, 268
Municipality Type Fixture Count Scope ofWork
Arvada, CO City
Broomfield, CO City
Centennial, CO City
Erie, CO ( Project 1)
Erie, CO ( Project 2) Town
Erie, CO ( Project 3)
Louisville, CO City
Northglenn, CO City
Thornton, CO Town
Timnath, CO ( Project 1)
Town
Timnath, CO ( Project 2)
Windsor, CO ( Project 1)
Windsor, CO ( Project 2)
Windsor, CO ( Project 3) Town
Windsor, CO ( Project 4)
Windsor, CO ( Project 5)
Munidpalty
Berlin, CT ( Project 1)
Berlin, CT ( Project 2)
Bristol, CT
Chester, CT ( Project 1)
Chester, CT ( Project 2)
Darien, CT ( Project 1)
Darien, CT ( Project 2)
East Lyme, CT ( Project 1)
East Lyme, CT ( Project 2)
Farmington, CT ( Project 1)
Farmington, CT ( Project 2)
Gales Ferry, CT
Glastonbury, CT
Granby, CT ( Project 1)
Granby, CT ( Project 2)
Groton Utilities, CT
Groton, CT ( Project 1)
Groton, CT ( Project 2)
Jewett City, CT
Ledyard, CT
Mansfield, CT ( Project 1)
Mansfield, CT ( Project 2)
Meriden, CT ( Project 1)
Meriden, CT ( Project 2)
Middlefield, CT ( Project 1)
Middlefield, CT ( Project 2)
Middletown, CT ( Project 1)
Middletown, CT ( Project 2)
Montville, CT ( Project 1)
Montville, CT ( Project 2)
New London, CT
Norwich, CT
Old Lyme, CT ( Project 1)
Old Lyme, CT ( Project 2)
Putnam ( Spc District), CT
Rocky Hill, CT
South Norwalk
Electric & Water, CT
Sprague, CT
Sterling, CT
Stonington, CT
Suffield, CT ( Project 1)
Type F
Town
Town
Town
Appendix A
7, 675 Streetlight Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis 4, 987
2, 953
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Ownership Support
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1827 Audit & Data Reconciliation
Ownership Support
143 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, Decorative LED Design, Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Ownership Support 2,31 Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Lighting Deficiency Analysis 8,99 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
506 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1, 069 Audit, Inventory Billing Review, & Lighting Deficiency Analysis Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Ownership Support
1, 978 Streetlight Master Plan
Streetlight Maintenance Support
LED Conversion
ur
Connecticut
Contracts Total: 49 Total Fixtures: 63, 141
Count
2, 537
5,00
313
Town 843
Town 1, 498
Town 1, 728
Town
Town
Town
Municipal Utility
Town
Borough
Town
87 1, 000
157
2,56
1, 550
220
292
Town 800
City 4, 799
Town 351
City 5, 080
Town 1, 777
City
Municipal Utility
2, 516
5, 049
Town 396
Town
Town
858
L683
Municipal Utility 1,16
Town
Town
Town
Town
157
75 1, 700
680
sco{
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Audit, Data Reconciliation
Audit, Data Reconciliation
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Ownership Support & Turnkey LED Conversion
Full Turnkey LED Conversion
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 248
TankoLig hting
Suffield, CT ( Project 2)
Vernon, CT ( Project 1)
Town
Vernon, CT ( Project 2)
Waterbury, CT City
Waterford, CT City
West Hartford, CT Town
Wolcott, CT ( Project 1)
Town
Wolcott, CT ( Project 2)
Municipality
Miami Lakes, FL
Palm Bay, FL
Type
City
City
Municipality Type
Columbia County, GA County
Powder Springs, GA City
1, 669
7, 250
1, 976
6, 500
728
Appendix A
Connecticut ( Continued)
Contracts Total: 49 Total Fixtures: 63, 141
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Rebate/ Rte Changes Full Turnkey LED Conversion
Full Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Florida
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 4, 966
Fixture Count
900
4, 066
Scope ofWork
Turnkey LED Conversion
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Georgia
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 12, 311
Fixture our
10, 000
2, 311
ScFe of Wank
Streetlight Master Plan
Lighting Deficiency Study
Hawaii
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 3, 500
Kauai Island Utility Municipal Utility 3, 500
Cooperative, HI
Municipality " Type Fixture C
Bonners Ferry, ID City
Burley, ID City
Kootenai Electric Co- op Cooperative
40 35
245
Turnkey LED Conversion & Controls
Idaho
Contracts Total: 3 Total Fixtures: 320
Scope of Work
Streetlight Conversion
Streetlight Conversion
Streetlight Conversion
Illinois
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 1, 800
Municipality Type Fixture Count Scope of Work
Carbondale, IL City
Municipality Type
Monroe, LA ( Project 1)
City
Monroe, LA ( Project 2)
1, 800 Audit & Data Reconciliation
Louisiana
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 9, 085
Fixture Count Scope of Work
9, 085
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Streetlight Outage Inspection
Maine
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 840
Municipality Type Fixture count
Brewer, ME City 600
Orono, ME Town 240
Municipality
Annapolis, MD
College Park, MD
Hyattsville, MD (Project 1)
Hyattsville, MD ( Project 2)
Type
City
City
City
Scope of Work
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maryland
Contracts Total: 4 Total Fixtures: 12, 713
Fixture Count Scope of Work
6, 109 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
2, 701 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
2, 500 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1, 403 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, Utility Negotiations, & LED Conversion Massachusetts
Contracts Total: 58 Total Fixtures: 85, 047
Municipality Type Fixture Count Scope of Work
Acton, MA Town 900 Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Outage Inspection tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 249
TankoLighting
Andover, MA
Ayer, MA
Billerica, MA
Boston, MA
Bridgewater, MA
Burlington, MA
Clinton, MA
Dalton, MA
Dracut, MA
Dudley, MA
Duxbury, MA
Erving, MA
Everett, MA
Franklin, MA
Gardner, MA
Grafton, MA
Hanover, MA
Hopkinton, MA
Leominster, MA
Lexington, MA
Longmeadow, MA
Lowell, MA
Malden, MA
Manchester - by -the - Sea, MA
Marion, MA
Medford, MA
Millis, MA
Nahant, MA
Nantucket, MA
Newbury, MA
North Andover, MA
Northbridge, MA
Oxford, MA
Palmer, MA ( Project 1)
Palmer, MA ( Project 2)
Rockport, MA
Saugus, MA
Sharon, MA
Somerville, MA
Spencer, MA
Sudbury, MA
Walpole, MA ( Project 1)
Walpole, MA ( Project 2)
Walpole, MA ( Project 3)
Ware, MA
Warren, MA (Project 1)
Warren, MA ( Project 2)
Watertown, MA
Wayland, MA
Webster, MA
Westfield Electric
MUM Utility, MA
Westport, MA
Weymouth, MA
Williamstown, MA ( Project 1)
Williamstown, MA ( Project 2)
Winchendon, MA
Winchester, MA
Municipality
Royal Oak, MI
Town 1, 564
Town 520
Town 2, 600
City 4, 000
Town 1, 286
City 2, 400
Town 923
Town 740
Town 1, 555
Town 600
Town 343
Town 163
City 2, 965
Town 1, 648
City 1, 532
Town 860
Town 505
Town 563
City 3, 637
Town 2, 700
Town 1, 500
City 7, 000
City 3, 694
Town 363
City 350
City 4, 618
Town 436
Town 565
Town 798
Town 500
Town 1, 302
Town 1,81
Town 945
Town 902
Town 771
Town 2, 850
Town 1, 600
City 4, 842
Town 885
Town 591
2, 092
Town 224
105
Town 823
Town 437
City
Town
Town
Municipal Utility
Town
Town
Town
Town
Town
Town
Type
City
783
714
1, 485
4, 000
205
3, 720
627
564
1, 571
Massachusetts ( Continued)
Contracts Total: 58 Total Fixtures: 85, 047
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion & Controls
Turnkey LED Conversion
Audit, Data Reconciliation of Decorative Fixtures
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion & Controls
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Audit, Design, & Ownership Support
Turnkey LED Conversion, Controls
Turnkey LED Conversion
Audit, Design/ Installation Management
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Exterior Lights Audit & Data Reconciliation
Exterior Lighting Design & Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Design and Photometrics
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion & Controls
Turnkey LED Conversion
Maintenance Services
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Michigan
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 3,00
Fixture Count
3, 300
Scope of work
Audit & Data Reconciliation
Appendix A
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 250
TankoLighting
Municipality
Ballwin, MO
O' Fallon, MO
Municipality
Missoula, MT
Munit patity
Aurora, NE
Howells, NE
Kearney, NE
Nebraska Public Power District,
NE
Municipality
Boulder City, NV
Henderson, NV
Municipality
Goffstown, NH
Jaffrey, NH
Londonderry, NH
North Stratford, NH
Municipality
Toms River, NJ
Municipalll
Socorro, NM
Municipality
Buffalo, NY
East Rochester, NY
Geneva, NY
Gloversville, NY
Hamburg, NY
Ogdensburg, NY
Municipality
Athens, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Independence, OH
Warren, OH ( Project 1)
Warren, OH ( Project 2)
Zanesville, OH
Type
City
City
City
City
Village
City
Municipal Utility
Type
City
City
Town
Town
Town
Town
F
Missouri
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 6,13
ure Count Scope of Work
2, 113 Ownership Support
4, 500 Ownership Support
Montana
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 6, 000
e Count
6, 000
of work
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Nebraska
Contracts Total: 4 Total Fixtures: 4, 343
e Coun
200
200
3,06
637
Audit & Data Reconciliation
Audit & Data Reconciliation
Audit & Data Reconciliation
Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Design
Nevada
Contracts Total: 2 Total Fixtures: 1,00
Lure
100
1, 000
of Wor
Streetlight Replacement Design
Streetlight Replacement Design
New Hampshire
Contracts Total: 4 Total Fixtures: 803
Fixture Cc
460
151
143
49 Scope of Work
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
Turnkey LED Conversion
New Jersey
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 9, 300
Type Fixture Count Scope of Work
Township
TyG
City
Type
City
City
City
City
City
City
Type fixture Count
City 1,00
City 31, 762
City 1, 000
City 5, 319
City 2, 497
Appendix A
9, 300 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Ownership Support New Mexico
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 535
ure Coun
535
Scope ofWork
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
New York
Contracts Total: 6 Total Fixtures: 43, 808
Fixture Count Sc!
33, 000 LED Conversion & Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis 887 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
1, 696 Turnkey LED Conversion
1, 243 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, Ownership Support, & Turnkey LED Conversion 6, 049 Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Design
933 Turnkey LED Conversion
Ohio
Contracts Total: 6 Total Fixtures: 41, 678
Scope of Work
Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, & Ownership Support Audit, Data Reconciliation, Streetlight Repair Support
Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis, & Ownership Support Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Ownership Support
Audit & Data Reconciliation
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 251
TankoLighting
Wunidpality
Lincoln City, OR
Municipality
Pans, TN
Rockwood, TN
Coppell, TX
Corinth, TX
Georgetown, TX
Grapevine, TX
Houston, TX
Keller, TX
Killeen, TX
Laredo, TX
League City, TX ( Project 1)
League City, TX ( Project 2)
League City, TX ( Project 3)
Lewisville, D(
Round Rock, TX ( Project 1)
Round Rock, TX ( Project 2)
Victoria, TX
Municpality
Bountiful, UT
Logan, UT
Sandy, UT
South Jordan, UT
West Valley City, UT
Salt Lake County, UT
Utah Department of
Transportation
Municipality
Lyndon, VT
Municipality
Bremerton, WA ( Project 1)
Bremerton, WA ( Project 2)
Bremerton, WA ( Project 2)
Chelan County
Public Utility District, WA
Des Moines, WA
Kennewick, WA
Maple Valley, WA
Newcastle, WA
SeaTac, WA ( Project 1)
SeaTac, WA ( Project 2)
City
Type
City
City
Type
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Type
City
City
City
City
City
County
State Department
Type
Town
Type
City
Municipal Utility
City
City
City
City
City
Fixture Count Scope Cif Work
3, 152 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
898 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Ownership Support 6, 522 Streetlight Audit
2, 700 Audit & Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis 175, 000 Streetlight Ownership/ Maintenance Plan
3, 200 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
4,40 Audit, Data Reconciliation, Design, & Ownership Support 450 Streetlight Replacement Design
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
New Streetlight Installation Polices for Developments
911 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
3, 437 Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Ownership Support
Audit & Data Reconciliation
4, 703 Lighting Deficiency Analysis
Appendix A
Oregon
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 1, 019
rk
1, 019
Tennessee
Contracts Total: 2 Total Factures: 3,49
Fixture Count Scope of Work
2, 541
808
Turnkey LED Conversion ( Subcontractor to Prime)
Turnkey LED Conversion ( Subcontractor to Prime)
Texas
Contracts Total: 15 Total Fixtures: 220, 959
5,46
10, 000
Utah
Contracts Total: 7 Total Fixtures: 5, 870
re Count
775
415
120
245
280
4, 000
35 Scope of Work'
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Streetlight Conversions
Vermont
Contracts Total: 1 Total Fixtures: 14
Fixture Count Scope of Work
14 Downtown lighting project including Audit, Photometric Analysis, Design, Bid Coordination, Procurement Assistance, Installation Management, & Lamp Change Submission
Washington
Contracts Total: 10 Total Fixtures: 18, 715
Fixture Count
1 675
7, 000
1, 719
6, 000
419
769
1,33
Scope of Work
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Lighting Deficiency Study
Lighting Deficiency Study
Audit, Data Reconciliation, & Design
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Streetlight Replacement Design
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Streetlight Ownership Feasibility Analysis
Ownership Support
tankolighting. com 1220 Bayshore Blvd I San Francisco, CA 94124 I P 415. 24. 7579 I F 415. 822. 3626 252
ITEM 4. 16
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: APPROVE THE 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE TWO PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution to Approve the 2025
Amendment of the River Islands Phase Two
Parks and Open Space Master Plan
SUMMARY:
The Parks and Recreation Commission recommend City Council approve the 2025 amendment of the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan that was presented at the Parks and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting that was held on November 6, 2025. The proposed amendment to the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan allows for dwelling units and layout adjustments, a park amenity study and simplification with the design phase for each individual park and neighborhood as development occurs.
BACKGROUND:
The River Islands Parks and Open Space Master Plan is intended to provide a network of master planned parks and open spaces throughout the River Islands development.
The park locations along the river provide opportunities to experience the river in multiple ways. The Parks and Open Space Master Plan incorporates spaces that are woven throughout the River Islands community, at varying scales, to support an assortment of passive and active recreation. Several types of sports fields, ample opportunities to enjoy nature, and both pedestrian and bicycle circulation are included throughout the community.
In June of 2021, the City approved the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan for the River Islands Modified Phase Two Project. A total of 230.9 acres in the River Islands Modified Phase Two area are devoted to a variety of parks. The parks, in and around the developed areas, include neighborhood parks, community parks, linear parks ( trails), and pocket parks. There are also over 272 acres of other open space areas, including levees, drainage swales and protected wetlands.
In August of 2023, the City approved a Substantial Conformance request from River Islands Development LLC., for the Woodlands East District. The application for Substantial Conformance with VTM 6716 was submitted to include various modifications to the road alignments, lot size, and for the two Neighborhood Parks N5 and N7 which increased in acreage from 5. 39 to 7. 8 and 5. 12 to 5.4, respectively, and increased the size of lake L14.
In March of 2024, the City approved a request from the River Islands Development 253
CITY MANAGER REPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE THE 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE RIVER ISLANDS PHASE TWO
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
LLC., to build, own, and operate an auxiliary gym, utilizing 0. 91 acres of the land previously designated as the future C2 Community Park, resulting in a reduction of the park from 22. 50 acres to 21. 59 acres for the benefit of the new River Islands High School.
In September of 2025, the River Islands Development LLC., requested an amendment to the August 2, 2023, amendment. The proposed amendments to the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan simplifies the document to allow for the following:
Dwelling Units and Layout Adjustments
Changes to the number of dwelling units and expected population led to revisions in the overall development layout. The result is a change in some park locations, park sizes, and total acreages. As a result of these layout changes, two neighborhood parks ( N3 and N4) were consolidated into a single larger neighborhood park ( approximately 5 acres larger in size than the two smaller parks), to align with the geometry and use of the area. The plan still complies and exceeds Quimby Act requirements for parks and open space.
Park Amenity Study
A study was conducted to align park amenities with current population trends and community recreational needs. Some design elements were reduced or removed, such as dedicated sports fields, in favor of multi -purpose facilities that better meet community needs.
Simplification for Flexibility
Individual Park amenity listings were combined into a standard park format to simplify the planning document. This allows for flexibility in the design phase for each individual park and neighborhood, while still maintaining a minimum standard for compliance with park typology minimum requirements and performance benchmarks. A standard list of minimum amenities is now identified for each park type ( community/ neighborhood), rather than specifying amenities for each park area. The changes to the master plan do not reduce the quality and acreage of coverage of recreational amenities, but rather ensures that the park facilities are well -distributed, flexible, and responsive to the community' sevolving needs.
The proposed changes remain to be consistent with the Quimby Act for required park acreage. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the project is required to provide approximately 161. 87 acres of neighborhood and community parks. The amended Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan is compliant with the Quimby Act by providing approximately 167. 76 acres of parkland total.
254
CITY MANAGER REPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE THE 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE RIVER ISLANDS PHASE TWO
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:
The Parks and Recreation Commission and City staff recommend the City Council adopt the proposed resolution to approve the 2025 Amendment of the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lathrop to Approve the 2025 Amendment of the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan B. Redlined 2025 Amendment of the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan
255
CITY MANAGER REPORT PAGE 4
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE THE 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE RIVER ISLANDS PHASE TWO
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
APPROVALS:
t'- 11-, r
Tod L Sebastian Date
Parks and Recreation Director
X96 t5 - a.
i ' k Caguiat
ommunity Development Director
BractTaylor
City Engineer
Michael King
Assistant City Manager
Iihg/ 24. zS
Date
Date
IIirho- A
II. 1`{ •ZozS
Date
1 c/ • Zv 2 )--
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Step en 3. Salvatore
City Manager
17 • s --1.. s"
Date
256
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO APPROVE THE 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE RIVER ISLANDS PHASE TWO
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the Parks and Open Space Master Plan for River Islands is intended to provide a network of master planned parks and open spaces throughout the River Islands development; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council amend the River Islands Phase Two Parks Master Plan to be aligned with recent changes to the 2025 amendment; and WHEREAS, there are changes to the number of dwelling units and expected population, resulting in layout changes and consolidating two neighborhood parks ( N3 and N4) into a single larger neighborhood park; and
WHEREAS, a park amenity study was conducted to align park amenities with current population trends and community recreational needs, reducing dedicated sports fields in favor of multi -purpose facilities that better meet community needs; and
WHEREAS, individual park amenity listings were combined into a standard park format to simplify the planning document, allowing for flexibility in the design phase for each individual park and neighborhood, while still maintaining a minimum standard for compliance with park typology minimum requirements and performance benchmarks; and
WHEREAS, a standard list of minimum amenities is now identified for each park type ( community/ neighborhood), rather than specifying amenities for each park area to ensure that the park facilities are well distributed, flexible, and responsive to the community' sevolving needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve the 2025 Amendment of the River Islands Phase Two Parks and Open Space Master Plan.
257
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8th day of December 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas
City Clerk
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
258
ATTACHMENT B
REDLINED 2025 AMENDMENT OF THE RIVER ISLANDS
PHASE TWO PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
259
ORIGINAL
PARKS & OPEN SPACE
MASTER PLAN
RIVER
ISLANDS
260
REVISION
egpwColor Changed
RIVER ISLANDS
PARKS & OPEN SPACE
MASTER PLAN
throp, California
RIVER
ISLANDS
261
ORIGINAL
RIVER ISLANDS
Phase 2 Parks & Open Space
Master Plan
08.2. 2023
AMENDMENT
Prepared for:
River Islands at Lathrop
73 W. Stewart Road
Lathrop, California 95330
209) 879 - 7900
Prepared by:
O' Dell Engineering
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
209) 571- 1765
ENG1NEEfZ1 NG
262
REVISION
RIVER ISLANDS
Phase 2 Parks & Open Space
Master Plan
Date Updated
Prepared for:
River Islands at Lathrop
73 W. Stewart Road
Lathrop, California 95330
209) 879 - 7900
12. 08. 2025
AMENDMENT
Prepared by:
O' Dell Engineering
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
209) 571- 1765
ENG1 NEE - R1 NG
263
ORIGINAL LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES
FIGURES
FIGURE 3. 1 - TYPICAL TRAIL SECTIONS ( ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY) 18 FIGURE 3. 2 - TYPICAL TRAIL PLAN VIEW 20
FIGURE 3. - CONCEPT FOR A TYPICAL TRAIL REST NODE 20
FIGURE 4. 1 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SERVICE AREA MAP 40
FIGURE 4. 2 - COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE AREA MAP 41
FIGURE 4. 3 - PHASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION MAP 45
46 47
FIGURE 4. 6 - PHASE 2 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS 48
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 49
FIGURE 4. - PHASE 2 QUIMBY ACT PARK DESIGNATION MAP
FIGURE 4. 5 - PHASE 2 CIRCULATION MAP
TABLES
TABLE 2. 1 - PHASE 1 MINIMUM FACILITY REQUIREMENTS - CONDITION 116 5 TABLE 2. - PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE 7
TABLE 3. 1 - PARKS & OPEN SPACE PLANT SPECIES LIST 22
TABLE 4. 1 - QUIMBY ACT CALCULATIONS BY PARK TYPOLOGY 39 TABLE 4. 2 - PHASE 2 PROJECTED FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 42 TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE 43
TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION 44
264
REVISION LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES
FIGURES
FIGURE 3. 1 - TYPICAL TRAIL SECTIONS ( ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY) 19 FIGURE 3. 2 - TYPICAL TRAIL PLAN VIEW 20
FIGURE 3. - CONCEPT FOR A TYPICAL TRAIL REST NODE 20
FIGURE 3. 4 - LEVEE TRAIL CONCEPT SIGNAGE AND TRAIL MARKERS 21 FIGURE 4. 1 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SERVICE AREA MAP 41
FIGURE 4. 2 - COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE AREA MAP 42
FIGURE 4. 3 - PHASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION MAP 46
FIGURE 4. - PHASE 2 QUIMBY ACT PARK DESIGNATION MAP 50
FIGURE 4. 5 - PHASE 2 CIRCULATION MAP 51
FIGURE 4. 6 - PHASE 52 2 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS
TABLES
TABLE 2. 1 - PHASE 1 MINIMUM FACILITY REQUIREMENTS - CONDITION 116 TABLE 2. - PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE
TABLE 3. 1 - PARKS & OPEN SPACE PLANT SPECIES LIST
TABLE 4. 1 - QUIMBY ACT CALCULATIONS BY PARK TYPOLOGY
TABLE 4. 2 - PHASE 2 PROJECTED FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE
TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION
TABLE 4. 5 - PHASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION
Tables are put on new sheets
due to font size change
Page number changed due to
new sheets are added
5 7
23 40
43 44
45 47
265
266
REVISION
Color Changed
267
268
REVISION
Color Changed
Chapter 2
PROJECT CONTEXT
269
ORIGINAL
Chapter 3
PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
270
REVISION
Color Changed
Chapter 3
PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
271
CHAPTER 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS ORIGINAL
TABLE 2. - PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE
PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE DESIGNATIONS & STATUS
PARK # Park Name Quimby Act Designated Completion Status CO PARK OX. 62 ACRES)
C1 Lathrop Landing Community Park Yes Early Planning
C2 Champion Fields Community Park Yes Bidding
C3 STEAM Academy Community Park Yes Construction
C4 Levee Trail Yes
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK - ( APPROX. 26 ACRES)
N1 Michael Vega park Yes Completed
N2 Somerston Park Yes Completed
N3 Reflections Park Yes Completed
N4 Crystal Cove Park Yes Completed
N6 Summer House Park Yes Completed
N7 Tidewater Park Yes
N8 Old River Neighborhood Park Yes Construction Document Phase N9 Nototomne Park Yes Construction Document Phase
POCK RK - ( APPROX. 32 ACRES) b
P1 - P49 n/ a No Varies ( planning -completed)
WATER RELATED OPEN SPACE - ( APPROX. 9 ACRES)
W1 &W2 n/ a No Completed
ERAL OPEN SPACE - ( APPROX. 33 ACRES)
n/ a n/ a No I Varies ( planning -completed)
7 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 272
CHAPTER 2: CURRENT CONDITIONS REVISION
TABLE 2. - PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE
completion status
changed
PHASE 1 PARKS & OPEN SPACE DESIGNATI r J' 2, STATU
PARK # Park Name I nr. y
A; i si; noted Court I
c' Status
COMMUNITY PARK - ( APPROX. 62 ACRES)
Cl Lathrop Landing Community Park Yes Completed
C2 Champion Fields Community Park Yes Completed
C3 STEAM Academy Community Park Yes Completed
C4 Levee Trail Yes
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK - ( APPROX. 26 ACRES)
N1 Michael Vega park Yes Completed
N2 Somerston Park Yes Completed
N3 Reflections Park Yes Completed
N4 Crystal Cove Park Yes Completed
N6 Summer House Park Yes Completed
N7 Tidewater Park Yes ai. a -.
N8 Old River Neighborhood Park Yes Completed
N9 Nototomne Park Yes Completed
POCKET PARK - ( APPROX. 32 ACRES)
Pl-49 n/ a No Varies ( planning -completed)
WATER RELATED OPEN SPACE - ( APPROX. 9 ACRES)
W1 &W2 n/ a No Completed
GENERAL OP SPACE - ( APPROX. 33 ACRES)
n/ a n/ a No Varies ( planning -completed)
completion status
changed
7 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 273
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
FIGURE 3. 2 - TYPICAL TRAIL PLAN VIEW
EDUCATIONAL
SIGNAGE
411. 1.6.
BENCH
FIGURE 3. - CONCEPT FOR A TYPICAL TRAIL REST NODE
BENCH
OUTDOOR EXERCISE
EQUIPMENT
Trail Access
The following figure highlights pedestrian and non -motorized access to the levee trail hich is crucial to the concept of a walkable community. To this end, the levees have been designed with multiple access poi s at strategic neighborhood locations and to facilitate required levee maintenance. In order to accommodate bike groups, equ Irian riders, and other groups that require staging areas, strategic off -site parking locations will be available for access to the tr . These off -site access locations, designated with appropriate signage, won' t
necessarily coincide with parks or open spaces, are more closely associated with trail access points and adjacent uses with adequate parking. These sites may include Community Park C1, the transit oriented development area, the employment center, and the high school site. The transit oriented development area has been identified as a potential equestrian
BIKE REPAIR
STATION
RIVER ISLANDS TRAIL SIGN PROGRAM
PROPOSED TOPICS
Historic Mossdale Crossing Bridge, last link of the
Transcontinental Railroad, circa 1869.
Discover a California Treasure: the San Joaquin River
The San Joaquin River Delta by the numbers ( length, depth, number of islands, etc. —statistical overview)
Salute to Bennie and Joyce Gallo
Understanding the Primary Zone of the San Joaquin Delta The story behind Bradshaw' sCrossing Bridge
Mail delivery along the San Joaquin River
Recreation among the Delta Waterways
Indigenous people of the San Joaquin: The Yokuts and the Miwoks
Fishing in the San Joaquin River
The Pacific Flyway: a natural pathway for migratory birds Animal life along the San Joaquin
Building a 200 -year levee- a feat of modern engineering Crawdads!
The Dell' Osso brothers start farming in the 1920s
Lathrop' snaming and prominence as a railroad town
Ferry boats on the San Joaquin, circa 1848
Tracts of the Delta, including the Stewart Tract
1906 San Francisco earthquake survivors came to Lathrop Understanding the Paradise Cut flood bypass
Lathrop' sincorporation in 1989— anew city in an historic setting
Open space and protected species at River Islands
River Islands' vision of land stewardship
Trail Surfacing
The paved section of trail will be constructed of 3" of asphalt over 6" of road base of the trail. Shoulders of the trail will be constructed with 6" of compacted Class II aggregate base. Slopes of the levee will be stabilized with erosion control hydroseed. There will be no ornamental landscape or irrigation systems constructed in conjunction with any permanent levee trails.
Community Park C1
Changed to C4
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 20 274
REVISION CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
FIGURE 3. 2 - TYPICAL TRAIL PLAN VIEW
BENCH
EDUCATIONAL
SIGNAGE
vim
IOW
OUTDOOR EXERCISE
EQUIPMENT
r
FIGURE 3. - CONCEPT FOR A TYPICAL TRAIL REST NODE
BENCH
OUTDOOR EXERCISE
EQUIPMENT
BIKE REPAIR
STATION
RIVER ISLANDS TRAIL SIGN PROGRAM
PROPOSED TOPICS
Historic Mossdale Crossing Bridge, last link of the
Transcontinental Railroad, circa 1869.
Discover a California Treasure: the San Joaquin River
The San Joaquin River Delta by the numbers ( length, depth, number of islands, etc. —statistical overview)
Salute to Bennie and Joyce Gatto
Understanding the Primary Zone of the San Joaquin Delta The story behind Bradshaw' s Crossing Bridge
Mail delivery along the San Joaquin River
Recreation among the Delta Waterways
Indigenous people of the San Joaquin: The Yokuts and the Miwoks
Fishing in the San Joaquin River
The Pacific Flyway: a natural pathway for migratory birds Animal life along the San Joaquin
Building a 200 -year levee- a feat of modern engineering Crawdads!
The Dell' Osso brothers start farming in the 1920s
Lathrop' s naming and prominence as a railroad town
Ferry boats on the San Joaquin, circa 1848
Tracts of the Delta, including the Stewart Tract
1906 San Francisco earthquake survivors came to Lathrop Understanding the Paradise Cut flood bypass
Lathrop' sincorporation in 1989— a new city in an historic setting
Open space and protected species at River Islands
River Islands' vision of land stewardship
Trail Surfacing
The paved section of trail will be constructed of 3" of asphalt over 6" of road base. There will be no painted striping on the surface of the trail. Shoulders of the trail will be constructed with 6" of compacted Class II aggregate base. Slopes of the levee will be stabilized with erosion control hydroseed. There will be no ornamental landscape or irrigation systems constructed in conjunction with any permanent levee trails.
Community Park C1
Trail Access / Changed to C4
The following figure highlights pedestrian and non - motorized access to the leve trail, which is crucial to the concept of a walkable community. To this end, the levees have been designed with multiple acce points at strategic neighborhood locations and to facilitate required levee maintenance. In order to accommodate bike groups, questrian riders, and other groups that require staging areas, strategic off -site parking locations will be available for access to t trail. These off -site access locations, designated with appropriate signage, won' t
necessarily coincide with parks or open spac but are more closely associated with trail access points and adjacent uses with adequate parking. These sites may include Community Park C4, the transit oriented development area, the RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 20 275
CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
FIGURE 3. 4 - LEVEE TRAIL CONCEPT SIGNAGE AND TRAIL MARKERS 46 in
38in
Option A
080 Aluminum Sign Qty. 1
Contour Cutout I
18 in
THE BENNIE AND JOYCE GATTO
HISTORIC TRAIL
Since the 1960x. bonnie and Mug* (., Mohate
timle. wd their ' bet , ihebonitoortne
unIO fI. thnlm. TNanila named in
their hog " Monk you mpngle.
whose own families were boen In lathop.
have maple. ug all with their dem. crand
detke+ an and . ehc govtmtrw ne.
xthMk hx» len. 4,M the adrit orlog. I
olunternam thei mak. w lathe, n wnwYrnd
place to lire and work.
thle ell( Lll mnnunnm. wlemad fur Rnnle
Jnvte, will appear cm et only, eNns and markers
throughout the Itmlw. lelem.
36 in
7 MILES
it
8 MILES
t.sr 84V
N; trtw$ Hcn
461n
21 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Option B
080 Aluminum Sign Qty. 1
Contour Cutout I
18 In
THE BENNIE AND JOYCE GATTO
HISTORIC TRAIL
Since the 19304, nrnnw and Jomc< twin, h,
d. alt mod Moir liveg h, mr. nr.eoft,
y , Lathrop. I nit wall h wm. d in
their honor asv" IMnk, to lnm propk.
whom' own
d . oI.. wen' hung in Lathrop wh.Lave. Ineuirtd u. all with their dm. akm. nd iodic take, iu vet and culture. a in onntroment.
attar.
a
nvrtr. and atoll M ka d
mtlunterriam that nuke,. Lathrop* wordMul
place ' olive and work
I h.. pr+; ie' monmtram. t re. I d ktr!now mild
JN. e. will mower tut ell ul the . ung and ln. rken
tnrnunhn. tthe In mik . t.lrm.
6 MILES
9 MILES
38 in _
10 WALES,
Neiborhood Park 1
Cahnged
IPMILE MARKER
TRAIL MARKER
36 in
5 MILES_
ORIGINAL
Mile 1
Neighborhood Park 3
Changed;
Neighborhood Park 4
Removed
11 MILES
276
CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES REVISION
FIGURE 3. 4 - LEVEE TRAIL CONCEPT SIGNAGE AND TRAIL MARKERS V. I,
MO Al,...= Aol OI
r
1Chou 1
THE WAD AIM ) tiff &ITTt
MIMIC TIM
m' wila6 tw. 4. eekit owes
Y
e A9.
m*. MI + s. Mir + e wrei r
14. es at it ' O. el
MAW b tMI.+ F .•
a....r•
om wat w. Y Manea oral
wit... ow pww. w. er.
AM.., I. orsolo. a... M
awrevwieM *
wMW we.*
pm y..... M. wM
ror. p, xe •owel. 1 b. na. w@
xt.
7 MILES
8 MILES ,
rA
Opts* Li
DSO Alu, irun Sl; nQty. I
Grvsv [ tiri
MI $ T1 I1I Jt%l )OTtf ono
HISTttlt THAN
Orb Inv w pr Mrws; w vt M1
at bd or••••••• I,,.
IA M.. 1..10.
b 444. , vehe
O..+ danM. b1l lwaiws... w wM
moo . n w. evb.",. +. we.. aw.
4 Rs, e ^.O aMJ
w:. l.l wt.* • a.. exl. orA
II.. Mew wuw. nwa. a. aororl W bwaor sot
a ... W eg..... iN. t* ow. wad. .. w.
6 MILES
9 MILES
10 MILES'
Neiborhood Park 1
Cahnged
tMILE MARKER
TRAIL MARKER
5 MILES
11 MILES,
Mile 1
Neighborhood Park 3
Changed;
Neighborhood Park 4
Removed
21 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 277
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
staging area location due to its proximity and access to the levee trail. If equestrian access is required prior to development of the staging area, an interim location can be determined to provide parking, potable water access and other amenities necessary.
3. 7 PLANTING
Plant materials for all parks and open
j spaces will be selected from Table 3. 1 -
r1 - Parks & Open Space Plant Species List.
S Alternative species may be substituted
or added and will be considered on a
project by project basis by the agency
listed in Table 4. 3 - Agency Review Table.
Substitutions will be based on the suitability
of the species in terms of similarity of theme,
characteristics, size, form, tolerance of
climatic conditions, soil requirements and
water usage. Plant species have been
selected to mimic existing characteristics
and habitat of the delta waterways and
vegetated agricultural hedgerows. Plant
material selection will strongly consider
the use of drought -tolerant, durable
and long-ived species that give the
appearance and imagery of the Delta
Valley. Species are well adapted to the
climatic conditions and soil types typical
of the River Islands Development. Large
naturally shaped flowering shrubs species
should be selected to mimic the image of traditional hedgerows typical of the surrounding agricultural region. Flowering species that create year- round interest are of high preference. Plant and tree selections do not include invasive characteristics, such as: surface roots that can spread, creating trip hazards or that can be destructive to surrounding curbs and walks, species that produce large wind blown seed varieties that become invasive or destructive, varieties that are extremely allergenic and varieties with toxic properties that can be digested by humans or animals.
Neighborhood Park 3
Changed
C Levee trail access points
While fruiting varieties of trees or shrubs may hearken to the true agricultural use of the River Islands project, the use of such species can create maintenance challenges and become problematic as litter creating rodent or pest problems. These species will be avoided except in specific locations where maintenance and control can be exercised. Plant selections have been determined based upon natural shape of species with minimal pruning or maintenance. Shrubs will be used as a screen for fences or utility structures in parks and open spaces. Evergreen plant material as a background is preferable to maintain year- round screening, however, the usage of decorative deciduous plant species is desirable and recommended with care being taken to maintain year- round interest and structure.
Spacing of plant material will be made based upon the species being utilized to create fullness and allow for ultimate growth impact.
The use of traditional " lawn" species and spaces will be limited to parks and public open spaces that encourage active recreational use. When " lawn" species are utilized, varieties will include deep rooting species that use less water than traditional varieties. The use and application of "lawn" species will follow the guideline and requirements set for in AB1881. Where bio- swales will be incorporated, species will be selected that filter and slow the movement of water from curb inlets to drain inlets. Species will be tolerant of flooding and will be irrigated to maintain an alternative appearance year- round.
Tree varieties have been selected to imitate a rural Delta Valley aesthetic. Evergreen varieties will be used to frame and give additional interest year- round to selected areas. Flowering or accent trees will be selected for year- round interest through flower characteristics, branching patterns, bark color and shape.
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 22 278
REVISION CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
employment center, and the high school site. The transit oriented development area has been identified as a potential equestrian staging area location due to its proximity and access to the levee trail. If equestrian access is required prior to development of the staging area, an interim location can be determined to
provide parking, potable water access
and other amenities necessary.
0--::\..., _.
t"_1 ,._ 1
I, -....: 410.' -
r
2.••••••••.
r
Neighborhood Park 3
Changed
Levee trail access points
3. 7 PLANTING
Plant materials for all parks and open
spaces will be selected from Table 3. 1 -
Parks & Open Space Plant Species List.
Alternative species may be substituted
or added and will be considered on a
project by project basis by the agency
listed in Table 4. 3 - Agency Review Table.
Substitutions will be based on the suitability
of the species in terms of similarity of theme,
characteristics, size, form, tolerance of
climatic conditions, soil requirements and
water usage. Plant species have been
selected to mimic existing characteristics
and habitat of the delta waterways and
vegetated agricultural hedgerows. Plant
material selection will strongly consider the
use of drought -tolerant, durable and longlived species that give the appearance and imagery of the Delta Valley. Species
are well adapted to the climatic conditions
and soil types typical of the River Islands Development. Large naturally shaped flowering shrubs species should be selected to mimic the image of traditional hedgerows typical of the surrounding agricultural region. Flowering species that create year- round interest are of high preference. Plant and tree selections do not include invasive characteristics, such as: surface roots that can spread, creating trip hazards or that can be destructive to surrounding curbs and walks, species that produce large wind blown seed varieties that become invasive or destructive, varieties that are extremely allergenic and varieties with toxic properties that can be digested by humans or animals.
While fruiting varieties of trees or shrubs may hearken to the true agricultural use of the River Islands project, the use of such species can create maintenance challenges and become problematic as litter creating rodent or pest problems. These species will be avoided except in specific locations where maintenance and control can be exercised. Plant selections have been determined based upon natural shape of species with minimal pruning or maintenance. Shrubs will be used as a screen for fences or utility structures in parks and open spaces. Evergreen plant material as a background is preferable to maintain year- round screening, however, the usage of decorative deciduous plant species is desirable and recommended with care being taken to maintain year- round interest and structure.
Spacing of plant material will be made based upon the species being utilized to create fullness and allow for ultimate growth impact.
The use of traditional " lawn" species and spaces will be limited to parks and public open spaces that encourage active recreational use. When " lawn" species are utilized, varieties will include deep rooting species that use less water than traditional varieties. The use and application of "lawn" species will follow the guideline and requirements set for in AB 1881. Where bio- swales will be incorporated, species will be selected that filter and slow the movement of water from curb inlets to drain inlets. Species will be tolerant of flooding and will be irrigated to maintain an alternative appearance year- round.
Tree varieties have been selected to imitate a rural Delta Valley aesthetic. Evergreen varieties will be used to frame and give additional interest year- round to selected areas. Flowering or accent trees will be selected for year- round interest through flower characteristics, branching patterns, bark color and shape.
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 22 279
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
3. 9 CONNECTIVITY
Connecting parks to their users is an important piece of increasing community investment and use of parks facilities. Best practices typically involve locating new parks centrally within a neighborhood or adjacent to other community amenities, such as schools or community centers, in order to increase visibility and use. Alternately, locating walkable streets and bicycle paths to connect parks with other community hot spots provides alternative access for users who cannot or do not prefer to drive. The same efforts may be made to align public transportation stops with parks, in an effort to coordinate parks and trail heads adjacent to public transit.
In the case of River Islands, geographically adjacent amenities such as schools, town center, lakes, and the rivers are opportunities for establishing walkable, bike - able connections. A non -vehicular option to navigate these sites and others within the community might encourage users to walk or bike between natural and cultural amenities firsthand rather than driving between each. Establishing and utilizing levee trails and connecting them to park locations helps establish a non -vehicular connection in River Islands.
Easy pedestrian and non - motorized access to the levee trail is crucial to the concept of a walkable community. Multiple off -site parking options will be available for access to the trail for those who need to travel to an access point for vehicle or horse off- load.
An equestrian staging area is proposed near the transit oriented area due to its ample space and access to the levee trail. These off - site access locations, designated with appropriate signage, may be included at Community Park C1, the transit oriented development area, the employment center, and at the high school site. Community Park Cl Changed to C4
3. 10 ACCESS AND INCLUSION
ADA and Beyond Planning for inclusion
Trends in park development nationwide are beginning to include varied recreation opportunities such that all members of a community may enjoy public recreation facilities. It is standard best practice to comply with all local and federal guidelines for universal accessibility in public spaces per the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) regulations. New projects and retrofits to existing parks and facilities must seek to include all members of the community. In addition to complying with ADA standards for basic accessibility, park designs may include standards from the California State Parks Accessibility Guidelines in order to increase accessibility to its facilities for all users.
Recreation amenities such as walking paths may include signage and wayfinding for persons with visual impairment, while play areas may include accessibility options for caregivers with varied levels of physical ability. Play areas should include solid impact -attenuating surfaces in order to ensure a safe path of travel for all users.
Universal Design and Social Inclusion
In more recent years, park features have moved toward including universal access, social inclusion, and sensory integration to include everyone. Incorporating these elements increases the parks' ability to attract many unique users and increases the functionality of the amenity. Parks and recreation amenities which encourage participation by all residents and visitors, regardless of physical or mental ability, demonstrate investment in the public.
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 34 280
REVISION CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES
3. 9 CONNECTIVITY
Connecting parks to their users is an important piece of increasing community investment and use of parks facilities. Best practices typically involve locating new parks centrally within a neighborhood or adjacent to other community amenities, such as schools or community centers, in order to increase visibility and use. Alternately, locating walkable streets and bicycle paths to connect parks with other community hot spots provides alternative access for users who cannot or do not prefer to drive. The same efforts may be made to align public transportation stops with parks, in an effort to coordinate parks and trail heads adjacent to public transit.
In the case of River Islands, geographically adjacent amenities such as schools, town center, lakes, and the rivers are opportunities for establishing walkable, bike -able connections. A non -vehicular option to navigate these sites and others within the community might encourage users to walk or bike between natural and cultural amenities firsthand rather than driving between each. Establishing and utilizing levee trails and connecting them to park locations helps establish a non -vehicular connection in River Islands.
Easy pedestrian and non - motorized access to the levee trail is crucial to the concept of a walkable community. Multiple off -site parking options will be available for access to the trail for those who need to travel to an access point for vehicle or horse off- load.
An equestrian staging area is proposed near the transit oriented area due to its ample space and access to the levee trail. These off - site access locations, designated with appropriate signage, may be included at Community Park C4, the transit oriented development area, the employment center, and at the high school site. Community Park Cl Changed to C4
3. 10 ACCESS AND INCLUSION
ADA and Beyond Planning for inclusion
Trends in park development nationwide are beginning to include varied recreation opportunities such that all members of a community may enjoy public recreation facilities. It is standard best practice to comply with all local and federal guidelines for universal accessibility in public spaces per the Americans with Disabilities ( ADA) regulations. New projects and retrofits to existing parks and facilities must seek to include all members of the community. In addition to complying with ADA standards for basic accessibility, park designs may include standards from the California State Parks Accessibility Guidelines in order to increase accessibility to its facilities for all users.
Recreation amenities such as walking paths may include signage and wayfinding for persons with visual impairment, while play areas may include accessibility options for caregivers with varied levels of physical ability. Play areas should include solid impact -attenuating surfaces in order to ensure a safe path of travel for all users.
Universal Design and Social Inclusion
In more recent years, park features have moved toward including universal access, social inclusion, and sensory integration to include everyone. Incorporating these elements increases the parks' ability to attract many unique users and increases the functionality of the amenity. Parks and recreation amenities which encourage participation by all residents and visitors, regardless of physical or mental ability, demonstrate investment in the public.
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 34 281
CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES ORIGINAL
Playground areas provide children space to develop essential emotional, social and physical skills. Therefore, these spaces should include elements appropriate for supporting all facets of childhood development in a safe environment. Cutting -edge studies of children and nature suggest a myriad of benefits in integrating opportunities for spontaneous learning with natural systems into playgrounds.
Examples may include non -programmed areas consisting of varied topography and surface materials, planting of trees within the playground space, flexible play space edges to encourage play to extend to other natural areas of the park. As a valuable experience in childhood development, nature play may be explored as a signature resource to be developed.
ISize and Space for Approach and
The National Recreation and Park Assoc!.
NRPA) de" nes three pillars impactful to
communities.
Conservation
Health and Wellness
Social Equity
Text Re -organized
Social equity in parks refer to a person' sability to access health and wellness benefits associated with using the park. Universal design enables groups in society who struggle with physical or mental abilities to fully access and utilize parks and recreational spaces. The following six areas of park design contribute to creating socially inclusive spaces with universal accessibility and sensory integration.
1. Facilities: parking areas, pathways, restrooms, public buildings, and access to water.
2. Parking: provide more than the minimum ADA requirements for parking spaces. Provide accessible parking throughout the park and located near inclusive play areas. This provides numerous access points available to all users.
3. Pathways: Exceed ADA width guidelines Wider pathways allow for easier group access and multiple wheeled devices like wheelchairs and strollers.
4. Restrooms Locate restrooms near ball fields and inclusive play areas. Include family restrooms large enough to house a full- size changing table, and large enough for a caregiver to attend to a full- size adult.
5. Splash Pads: Access to pools and water areas can benefit individuals with different disabilities. Splash pads are a great way to provide easy access to water. Actuators should be planned for locations and heights that are accessible.
6. Playgrounds: Children with disabilities are one of the largest under served minority groups in our nations. 8.9% of children between the ages of 3 and 21 years old have a disability. Of these, approximately 1.% will have a physical disability, 1.% will have a sensory disability, 19.% will have a communicative disability, 11. 2% will have a social/ emotional disability, and 53. 9% will have an intellectual disability. Additionally, 2.% will have multiple disabilities and 10.% will have chronic health impairment such as cancer. Disability is often misconstrued as inability to experience play because of limitation form impairment. With over 16% of the local population of 35 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 282
CHAPTER 3: PHASE 2 PARK SYSTEM GUIDELINES REVISION
Playground areas provide children space to develop essential emotional, social and physical skills. Therefore, these spaces should include elements appropriate for supporting all facets of childhood development in a safe environment. Cutting - edge studies of children and nature suggest a myriad of benefits in integrating opportunities for spontaneous learning with natural systems into playgrounds.
Examples may include non - programmed areas consisting of varied topography and surface materials, planting of trees within the playground space, flexible play space edges to encourage play to extend to other natural areas of the park. As a valuable experience in childhood development, nature play may be explored as a signature resource to be developed.
Seven Principles of Universal Design"
Equitable Use
Flexible Use
Intuitive Use
Perceptible Information
Tolerance for Error
Low Physical Effort
Size and Space for Approach and Use
The National Recreation and Park Association
NRPA) defines three pillars impactful to our
communities.
Conservation
Health and Wellness
Social Equity
Text Re -organized
Social equity in parks refer to a person' s ability to access health and wellness benefits associated with using the park. Universal design enables groups in society who struggle with physical or mental abilities to fully access and utilize parks and recreational spaces. The following six areas of park design contribute to creating socially inclusive spaces with universal accessibility and sensory integration.
1. Facilities: parking areas, pathways, restrooms, public buildings, and access to water.
2. Parking: provide more than the minimum ADA requirements for parking spaces. Provide accessible parking throughout the park and located near inclusive play areas. This provides numerous access points available to all users.
3. Pathways: Exceed ADA width guidelines Wider pathways allow for easier group access and multiple wheeled devices like wheelchairs and strollers.
4. Restrooms: Locate restrooms near ball fields and inclusive play areas. Include family restrooms large enough to house a full- size changing table, and large enough for a
caregiver to attend to a full- size adult.
5. Splash Pads: Access to pools and water areas can benefit individuals with different disabilities. Splash pads are a great way to provide easy access to water. Actuators should be planned for locations and heights that are accessible.
6. Playgrounds: Children with disabilities are one of the largest under served minority groups in our nations. 8.9% of children between the ages of 3 and 21 years old have a disability. Of these, approximately 1.% will have a physical disability, 1.% will have a sensory
disability, 19.% will have a communicative disability, 11. 2% will have a social/ emotional disability, and 53. 9% will have an intellectual disability. Additionally, 2.% will have multiple disabilities and 10.% will have chronic health impairment such as cancer. Disability is often misconstrued as inability to experience play because of limitation form impairment. With over 16% of the local population of 35 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 283
ORIGINAL
CHAPTER 4
PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN &
PARK CONCEPT PLANS
284
REVISION
Color Changed
CHAPTER 4
PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN &
PARK CONCEPT PLANS
285
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN & PARK CONCEPTS
4. 1 CITY OF LATHROP PARKS AND OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS The Lathrop General Plan calls for a network of open spaces which include neighborhood parks, community parks, and recreation corridors that run along waterbodies or connect major components of the overall park system. This system will in part follow along boundary levees and sloughs as well as the river system, and be made up of pedestrian and bike trails, open space and formal parks. Irrigation of open spaces will implement recycled water distributed through a purple pipe system to reduce the amount of potable water used. Some parks will be adjacent to schools to maximize their usefulness for the community, while others will be standalone parks separate from educational facilities. Wildlife habitat including wetlands have been created to enhance natural habitat, which will aid in resource management of the planning area.
4. 2 PARK ACREAGE & SERVICE AREA STANDARDS
Text revised
added)
Condition 116 of Vesting Tentative Map 3694 requires a minimum number and size ( in acres) of various recreational facilities for Phase 1 of River Islands. The City of Lathrop has had the discretion to substitute certain facilities to provide more flexibility in programming. For instance, a multi -use field may be constructed to accommodate both softball and baseball, but credit could be given for the specific facility shown in Condition 116. Parks that were designed and built as a part of Phase 1 development included mandatory elements required by Condition 116 or otherwise required by the City, and " additional recreational facilities", facilities that were not required by condition of approval. Phase 2 acreages and facilities/ amenities have been calculated and determined separately from the Phase 1 development and will stand apart from any Phase 1 development requirements. Phase 2 requirements are outlined below in Tables 4. 1 and 4. 2.
Community and neighborhood park acreages for Phase 2 were used to calculate and meet the State' s minimum parkland dedication requirements. Neighborhood Parks must be provided at a rate of 2 acres per 1, 000 population and Community Parks at 3 acres per 1, 000 populations. The population is estimated by using 3. 0 persons per household. The following table
summarizes the minimum acreage requirement and shows that the minimum requirement has been met for Phaca Text revised
added)
STANDARD
DWELLING UNITS 10, 726
POPULATION 3. 0
per DU 32, 178
COMMUNITY PARKS ( C) 3 acres/ 1000 96. 53 acres 97. 44 acres 0. 91 acres NEIGHBORHOODPARKS ( N) 2 acres / 1000 64. 36 acres 68. 05 acres 3. 69 acres TOTAL C & N PARKS 5 ACRES/ 1000 160. 89 ACRES 166. 67 ACRES 4. 6 ACRES RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 40 286
REVISION CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN & PARK CONCEPTS
4. 1 CITY OF LATHROP PARKS AND OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS The Lathrop General Plan calls for a network of open spaces which include neighborhood parks, community parks, and recreation corridors that run along waterbodies or connect major components of the overall park system. This system will in part follow along boundary levees and sloughs as well as the river system, and be made up of pedestrian and bike trails, open space and formal parks. Irrigation of open spaces will implement recycled water distributed through a purple pipe system to reduce the amount of potable water used. Some parks will be adjacent to schools to maximize their usefulness for the community, while others will be standalone parks separate from educational facilities. Wildlife habitat including wetlands have been created to enhance natural habitat, which will aid in resource management of the planning area.
4. 2 PARK ACREAGE & SERVICE AREA STANDARDS
Text Added
Condition 118 of the Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Map 6716 requires Phase 2 parks to meet the minimum acreages as required by the State' sQuimby Act. Condition 116 of Vesting Tentative Map 3694 requires a minimum number and size ( in acres) of various recreational facilities for Phase 1 of River Islands. The City of Lathrop has had the discretion to substitute certain facilities to provide more flexibility in programming. For instance, a multi - use field may be constructed to accommodate both softball and baseball, but credit could be given for the specific facility shown in Condition 116. Parks that were designed and built as a part of Phase 1 development included mandatory elements required by Condition 116 or otherwise required by the City, and " additional recreational facilities", facilities that were not required by condition of approval. Phase 2 acreages and facilities/ amenities have been calculated and determined separately from the Phase 1 development and will stand apart from any Phase 1 development requirements. Phase 2 requirements are outlined below in Tables 4. 1 and 4. 2.
Text Added
Community and neighborhood park acreages for Phase 2 were used to calcu to and meet the State' s minimum parkland dedication requirements. Neighborhood Parks must be provided at a rate of acres per 1, 000 population and Community Parks at 3 acres per 1, 000 populations. The population is estimated by usin 3. 0 persons per household. The following table summarizes the minimum acreage requirement and shows that the minimum r quirement has been met for Phase 2.
In situations where the acreage exceeds the Quimby Act requirements, individual parks may be reduced in size at a later date as long as the functionality of the park is maintained. Additionally, if unit count increases or decreases, the population estimates may also change accordingly which will further alter the total park acreage requirements up or down.
IABLE / 1. - QUIMBY ACT CALCULATIONS BY PARK TYPOLOGY
t
CU. _ • . `
STANDARD R! !! NtIN- yr. 0?rSt A * S PANGr_.
DWELLING UNITS 10, 791
POPULATION 3. 0 per DU 32,73
COMMUNITY PARKS ( C) 3 acres/ 1000 97. 12 acres 97. 14 acres 0.2 acres NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS ( N) 2 acres/ 1000 64. 75 acres 70. 62 acres 5. 87 acres j' TOTAL C & N PARKS 5 ACRES/ 1000 161. 87 ACRES 167. 76 ACRES 5. 89 ACRES i Sizes and locations of parks subject to change through Neighborhoo Number Changed
Development Plan process and subject to Ci y
review and approval.
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 40 287
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL
4. 3 DISTRIBUTION OF EXISTING PARKS AND FACILITIES
Current maps of River Islands parks were studied based upon established measurements of user walkability and recommended park programming to determine new park locations for Phase 2. Smaller neighborhood parks service the immediate surrounding neighborhood with the minimum being Y4 mile radius up to Y2 mile radius. Larger community parks have a larger service radius
with the range of Y2 mile to 1 mile radius.
Figure 4. 1 shows most areas within Phase 1 and Phase 2 are covered within the 1/4 mile radius, and all areas are serviced within h mile. As can be seen all areas within Phase 2 fall within the 1/2 mile service range for neighborhood parks, most areas falling within a'/ 4 mile radius.
FIGURE 4. 1 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SERVICE AREA MAP
Neighborhood
park modified
Neighborhood
park added
Neighborhood Park
School
1 / 4 Mile Radius
1 / 2 Mile Radius
Phase 2 Limits
Neighborhood
park removed
Private
Park
Neighborhood
park removed
Neighborhood
park change
of location
41 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 288
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION
4. 3 DISTRIBUTION OF EXISTING PARKS AND FACILITIES
Current maps of River Islands parks were studied based upon established measurements of user walkability and recommended park programming to determine new park locations for Phase 2. Smaller neighborhood parks service the immediate surrounding neighborhood with the minimum being 1/4 mile radius up to 1/ 2 mile radius. Larger community parks have a larger service radius
with the range of /2 mile to 1 mile radius.
Figure 4. 1 shows most areas within Phase 1 and Phase 2 are covered within the 1/4 mile radius, and all areas are serviced within 2 mile. As can be seen all areas within Phase 2 fall within the 1/2 mile service range for neighborhood parks, most areas falling within a'/ 4 mile radius.
FIGURE 4. 1 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SERVICE AREA MAP
Neighborhood
park modified
Neighborhood Park
School
1/ 4 Mile Radius
1/ 2 Mile Radius
Phase 2 Limits
Neighborhood
park added
Neighborhood
park removed
Neighborhood
park removed
Neighborhood
park change
of location
41 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 289
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS Figure 4. 2 shows a more even distribution of community parks within Phase 1 than in Phase 2. A small area within the transit oriented development ( TOD) areas falls outside the community park buffer. This area will primarily be parking and infrastructure related to the Valley Link train station. With this exception, all areas within the development fall within a 1 mile radius of a Community Park and most areas fall within a' Y2 mile service area.
FIGURE 4. 2 - COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE AREA MAP
Map Revised
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 42 290
REVISION CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS Figure 4. 2 shows a more even distribution of community parks within Phase 1 than in Phase 2. A small area within the transit oriented development (TOD) areas falls outside the community park buffer. This area will primarily be parking and infrastructure related to the Valley Link train station. With this exception, all areas within the development fall within a 1 mile radius of a Community Park and most areas fall within a' h mile service area.
FIGURE 4. 2 - COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE AREA MAP
Map Revised
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 42 291
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL
4. PARK AMENITY BENCHMARKS
The National Recreation and Park Association ( NRPA) has long been an organization relied on for guidelines and instruction regarding best practices for parks and open spaces. In 2019 the NRPA published an Agency Performance Review document providing benchmarks for suggested amenity counts based on residents per square mile. Table 4. 2 reflects the number of amenities proposed for phase 2 based on the NRPA' s
published recommendations and Table 4. reflects which parks they are located in.
4. 5 PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
The parks and open space system depicted in this chapter were developed following multiple meetings and reviews of park system components with City of Lathrop staff. In order to clearly identify the components of the system maps were created and are included in this chapter as follows:
Figure 4. 3 - Phase 2 Park Designation Map
Figure 4. - Phase 2 Quimby Act Park Designation Map<
TABLE 4. 2 - PHASE 2 PROJECTED FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Additional
figures listed
Numbers
revised
OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES PER NRPA PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS Population P SO Mile
Re3idents/ SQ
Milo
Phase 2 Population: 32, 178 517
i#1 . r
Standard
1 per shown
population)
Standard for
RI Phrase 2
Development
Phase 2
Facilities
Proposed
equired
Standard
Met
Court Sports
Basketball Courts 7400 ' 4. 35 6
Tennis Courts 4, 858 6.2 8 v
Multiuse courts ( basketball/ vollyball/ other) 16, 250 I
1. 98 - 2 v
Diamond Fields*
Baseball ( Youth) 7, 369 4 4. 37 4
Baseball ( Adult) Baseball/ softball 25, 834 ' 1. 25 1 k.
Softball Adult
have been combined
13, 773 2. 34 2
Softball Youth 15, 000 i
2. 15 2 v
Rectangular Fields
Multi Purpose 9, 000 ' 3. 58 4
Soccer Youth
Pickle ball / cricket/ 8, 784 3. 66 4 v
Soccer Adult irregular fields/ 15, 000 , 2. 15 2
Football fitness stations
have been 35, 572 6 0. 90 1 v
Other
added
Dog Park 55, 675 ' 0. 58 2
Skate Park 62, 325 0. 51 0
Ilgnteq le s, 2 deterred trom
43 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Revised text ( added)
292
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION
4. PARK AMENITY BENCHMARKS
The National Recreation and Park Association ( NRPA) has long been an organization relied on for guidelines and instruction regarding best practices for parks and open spaces. In 2019 the NRPA published an Agency Performance Review document providing benchmarks for suggested amenity counts based on residents per square mile. Table 4. 2 reflects the number of amenities proposed for phase 2 based on the NRPA' s
published recommendations and Table 4. reflects which parks they are located in.
4. 5 PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
The parks and open space system depicted in this chapter were developed following multiple meetings and reviews of park system components with City of Lathrop staff. In order to clearly identify the components of the system maps were created and are included in this chapter as follows:
Figure 4. 3 - Phase 2 Park Designation Map
Figure 4. - Phase 2 Quimby Act Park Designation Map
Figure 4. 5 - Phase 2 Circulation Map
Figure 4. 6 - Phase 2 Safe Routes To Schools
TABLE 4. 2 - PHASE 2 PROJECTED FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Additional
figures listed
All
highlighted
numbers
revised
OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES PER NRPA PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS Baseball/ softball
have been combined
Residents/ SQ
Phase 2 Population: 32,73 5. 17 6, 262
Desi lement Popu( n esign Elemen
Pickle ball / cricket/
irregular fields/
fitness stations
have been
r
Standard
1 per shown
population) 3
tandard for
RI Phase 2
evelopment
Phase 2= " e
Facilities
Propose.
q wired
tandard
Met
Court Sports
added
Basketball Courts I 7, 501 4. 32 6
Tennis Courts / 5, 461 5. 93 8 v
Multiuse courts basketball ollyball/ other) 15, 531 2. 08 2 ...---.
N.
Pickleball 7,37 4. 18 4 v
Baseball / Softball Fields 3, 007 10. 8 4
Multi Purpose Fields
Soccer football 3,33 9. 7 11and
Cricket have been removed N/ A N/ A 1
Dog Park 27508 1. 2 2 ko
Skate Park 33, 167 1. 0 0
Fitness Stations / Exercise Equipment 27262 1. 2 3
Phase 2 will include 4 lighted fields which includes 2 that were deferred from the first phase of developri ent. The City may choose to light any of the recreational fields listed above at the City' s discretion.
Despite performance benchmarks, the community' s
needs suggest that the dependency between proposed and
benchmarks are appropriate.
Revised text
43 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 293
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS Figure 4. 5 - Phase 2 Circulation Map
Figure 4. 6 - Phase 2 Safe Routes To School
4. 6 PRELIMINARY PARK CONCEPT PLANS
In order to identify intended locations of required and additional park elements throughout the development, preliminary concept plans have been developed for all Quimby Act related community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition examples of potential pocket parks, and linear parks have also been shown which will be built by River Islands, but not intended to be built in order to meet Quimby Act requirements. All concepts are simple concepts to convey basic park ideas and are not to be misconstrued as final designs. As each neighborhood is developed the park designs will be revisited and adjusted to meet specific neighborhood, budget, and recreational needs. Any changes to the park locations, acreages, or amenities must be approved by the City of Lathrop prior to construction. Modifications to park locations, acreages and/ or planned amenities shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lathrop prior to construction. Amendments to this Parks & Open Space Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lathrop.
Figures
mentioned in
prior sheet
4. 7 CITY OVERSIGHT & DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
There are many types of open spaces and recreational facilities incorporated into the River Islands Phase 2 development. While the development is located within the City boundaries, portions of these open spaces are owned by Reclamation District 2062 RD2062) and all parks and open space are maintained by the River Islands Public Finance Authority ( RIPFA). The following table has been provided to clearly delineate the required reviews to be completed by each agency, for each open space type.
The following descriptions describe the review typology listed in Table 4. 3.
Comprehensive Review - Comprehensive review refers to plan review for construction level improvement plans. Prior to Improvement Plans, a Site Plan for Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks shall be reviewed and approved by the City and Parks & Recreation Commission. These plans are typically reviewed and signed by the Public Works Department, Parks Recreation Department, and the Lathrop Manteca Fire District. The City may determine which departments are required for review based on a project by project basis.
Courtesy Review - A courtesy review of construction level improvement plans by the Public Works Department for open spaces owned and maintained by RD2062 and/ or RIPFA but not in the public right of way.
Utility Only Review - A review by the Public Works Department of construction level utility plans only, for spaces owned and maintained by RD2062 and/ or RIPFA.
TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE
OPEN SPACE TYPE TYPE OF REVIEW
City
of
Lathrop Comprehensive
Review
City
of
Lathrop
Utility
Only
Review
RD
2062 Parks &
Recreation Commission City
Council
Community Park
Levee Trail k
Neighborhood Park
Pocket Park o----
Linear Trail
Water Rltd Open Space ( non -park)
Open Space ( outside ROW)
Open Space ( ROW Related)
Parks & Open Space Master Plan
Table Revised
where highlighted
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 44 294
REV S ON CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS
4. 6 PRELIMINARY PARK CONCEPT PLANS
In order to identify intended locations of required and additional park elements throughout the development, preliminary concept plans have been developed for all Quimby Act related community parks and neighborhood parks. In addition examples of potential pocket parks, and linear parks have also been shown which will be built by River Islands, but not intended to be built in order to meet Quimby Act requirements. All concepts are simple concepts to convey basic park ideas and are not to be misconstrued as final designs. As each neighborhood is developed the park designs will be revisited and adjusted to meet specific neighborhood, budget, and recreational needs. Any changes to the park locations, acreages, or amenities must be approved by the City of Lathrop prior to construction. Modifications to park locations, acreages and/ or planned amenities shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lathrop prior to construction. Amendments to this Parks & Open Space Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lathrop.
4. 7 CITY OVERSIGHT & DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
There are many types of open spaces and recreational facilities incorporated into the River Islands Phase 2 development. While the development is located within the City boundaries, portions of these open spaces are owned by Reclamation District 2062 RD2062) and all parks and open space are maintained by the River Islands Public Finance Authority ( RIPFA). The following table has been provided to clearly delineate the required reviews to be completed by each agency, for each open space type.
The following descriptions describe the review typology listed in Table 4. 3.
Comprehensive Review - Comprehensive review refers to plan review for construction level improvement plans. Prior to Improvement Plans, a Site Plan for Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks shall be reviewed and approved by the City and Parks & Recreation Commission. These plans are typically reviewed and signed by the Public Works Department, Parks Recreation Department, and the Lathrop Manteca Fire District. The City may determine which departments are required for review based on a project by project basis.
Courtesy Review - A courtesy review of construction level improvement plans by the Public Works Department for open spaces owned and maintained by RD2062 and/ or RIPFA but not in the public right of way.
Utility Only Review - A review by the Public Works Department of construction level utility plans only, for spaces owned and maintained by RD2062 and/ or RIPFA.
TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE
OPEN SPACE TYPE TYPE OF REVIEW
City
of
LathropComprehensive
Review
City
of
Lathrop
Utility
Only
Review
RD
2062
Parks &
Recreation Commission
C
005
V
C
Community Park
Levee Trail
Neighborhood Park v
17 Pocket Park v
ear Trail s
I
Water Rltd Open Space ( non -park) v
Open Space ( outside ROW)
Open Space ( inside ROW) v
Parks & Open Space Master Plan
Table Revised
where highlighted
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 44 295
BI
ORIGINAL
TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN & PARK CONCEPTS
Individual Parks combined
by type in revised table
OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION! rAC! LITiE PER NRPA PERFORMANCE DENCHMARKS BY PARK* z' Z z z Z z Z z
a
z z
a
w.
Foy
iseball/ softball
ive been combined
Basketball Courts 2 1 1 1 1 6
Tennis Courts 6 2 8
Multiuse courts 1 1 2
Baseball ( Youth) 4 4
Baseball ( Adult) 1 1
Softball Adult 2 2
Softball Youth 2 2
Multi Purpose 1 2 1 4
4 2
A112
Soccer Youth 3 1
Soccer Adult 1 1
Football 1
Dog Park \ 1 1
Lighted fields areequired for (2) adult softball, (1) adult baseball, and ( 1) lighted soccer/ multi purpose field.
Soccer and football
have been removed
4 .#
Number
revised
Revised text (added)
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 45 296
REVISION CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS MASTER PLAN & PARK CONCEPTS TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION
OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Parks N 1- N 11 Total
Baseball/ softball
have been combined
Basketball Courts 3 3 6
Tennis Courts 8 8
Multiuse courts 1 1 2
Baseball / Softball 4 4
Multi Purpose 8 3 11
Cricket 1 1
Dog Park 2 2
Fitness Stations / Exercise Equipment 3
Pickle Ball Courts 4-- 4
Individual Parks
combined by category
Community Park
renumbered
Number
revised
Pickle ball / cricket/
irregular fields/
fitness stations
have been added
Phase 2 will include 4 lighted fields which includes 2 that were deferred from the first phase of development. The City II •
Despite performance benchmarks, the community' s needs suggest that the dependency between proposed and benchmarks are appropriate.
Text Changed
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 45 297
CHAPTER
4 :
PROPOSED
PARKS
MASTER
PLAN &
PARK
CONCEPTS
FIGURE
4. 3 -
PHASE
2 PARK
DESIGNATION
MAP Neighborhood
park /
pocket
park/ lake
added
and
L20
changed Linelocation/
ar
Park
11 added Font
size
is
enlarged
beto
fo11
r
ADA compliance.
Tables
move
are
d
theto
new
pages.
C1
changed
to
C4
School
CalculatioSi
n: #
of
Schools
x
2. 5
acres =
total
a
cres
Community
Park
4 a
doe
creage
s
not
we
include
area .
tland
When
a
park adjaceis
nt
to
levee , the
a
dista
20'
fro
nce
m
tothe
e
of
levee
is
not
included
in
park
acreage ca lculations.
Levee
Calculation :
Trail
Linea
Total
Feer
t
x
30'
width =
total
sq
ft (
43, 560
sq
ft =
1 acre)
Total
7. Miles =
Mile
7 s
The
30'
leve
wide
e
trail
bee
has
n
used
calcula
to
acreate ofge
the
Quimby
Act
and
does
not
include
the
leve
e
slope
s
or
20 -
foo
t
lev
ee
to
e.
The
a
pplicant
intends
regradeto
the
levee
federal
into
awate
rside
bench
which
will
be
ma
intained
by
Recla ma
tion
District
2062.
The re
will
be
no
public
access
to
lev
the
ee,
o
nly
the
waterside
bench. situaIn
tions
where
the
acreage
exceeds
the
Q
uimby
Act requiremen
ts,
indiv
idual
parks
ma
y
be
reduce
d
in
size
at
a
later
date
as
long
as
the
functiona
lity
of
thepark
main tis
Additio na
ined.
lly,
if counit
unt
increases
or decreases,
the population estimate
s
may
also
change
accordingly
which
will
further
a
lter
the
total
park
a
creage requirements
up
or
down.
Seepage
47 to
Table
4. 49,
fo5
r
Phase
2 Park Designation
Table < Ne
w
No
te
Added
46 I
RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE
2 PARKS
AND
OPEN
SPACE
MASTER
PLAN
298
REVISION CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS TABLE4. 5-P ASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION
PARK # PARK NAME ACREAGE QUIMBY
ACT
OWNERSHIP
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
N1 Neighborhood Park 1
N2
N3
N5
N6
N7
N8
N9
Highlighted
numbers have
changed
70. 62
6. 24
Neighborhood Park 2 \ 12. 47
14. 36
7.9 5. 2
5. 36
Neighborhood Park 3
Neighborhood Park 5
Neighborhood Park 6
Neighborhood Park 7
Neighborhood Park 8 5. 2
Neighborhood Park 9 4. 0
N1, N3 7 N8
ownership changed
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
CITY
CITY
2062
CITY
RD
RD 2062
RD 2062
RD 2062
CITY
School Sites
POCKET PARK
Neighborhood
park 4
removed
10 x BANTA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
23. 11
P- EV1 Pocket Park - East Village - 1 2. 33
v‘-............... 4,-7.1 IV.
name
P- EV2 Pocket Park - East Village - 2 0. 47
P- EV3 Pocket Park - East Village - 3 0. 31 Number
P- EV4 Pocket Park - East Villa e - 4 0. 66 < revised
P- EV5 Pocket Park - East Village - 5 0. 29
P- EV6 Pocket Park - East Village - 6 0. 40
P- LH 1 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 1 0. 94 Adding new
P- LH2 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 2 0. 34 Pocket Parks P- LH3 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 3 0. 29
P- LH4 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 4 0. 19
P- LH5 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 5 0. 42
P- LH6 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 6 0. 37
P- LH7 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 7 0. 49
P- LH8 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 8 0. 12 Number
P- LH9 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 9 0. 13 revised
P- LH 10 Pocket Park - Lake Harbor - 10 0. 51
P -W 1 Pocket Park - Woodland - 1 0. 38
P -W2 Pocket Park - Woodland - 2 0. 12
P -W3 Pocket Park - Woodland - 3 0. 87
P -W4 Pocket Park - Woodland - 4 0. 30
P -W5 Pocket Park - Woodland - 5 0. 36
P -W6 Pocket Park - Woodland - 6 0. 22
P -W7 Pocket Park - Woodland - 7 0. 22
P - W8 Pocket Park - Woodland - 8 0. 32
New sheet added due to font size
change
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 47 299
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION TABLE 4. 5 - PHASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION
PARK # PARK NAME ACREAGE QUIMBY
ACT
OWNERSHIP
P -W9 Pocket Park - Woodland - 9 0. 20
P -W 10 Pocket Park - Woodland - 10 0. 68
P -W 11 Pocket Park - Woodland - 11 0. 73
P -W12 Pocket Park - Woodland - 12 0. 22
P -W13 Pocket Park - Woodland - 13 0. 42
P -W14 Pocket Park - Woodland - 14 0. 27
P -W15 Pocket Park - Woodland - 15 0. 22
P -WE 1 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 1 0. 36
P- WE2 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 2 0. 89
P- WE3 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 3 0. 33 Number
P- WE4 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 4 0. 52 revised
P- WE5 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 5 0
P- WE6 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 6 0. 3
P- WE7 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 7 0. 73
P- WE8 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 8 0. 38
P- WE9 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 9 0. 22
P -WE 10 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 10 0. 68
P -WE ll Pocket Park - Woodland East - 11 0. 5
P- WE12 Pocket Park - Woodland East - 12 0. 66
P -WV 1 Pocket Park - West Village - 1 0. 19
P- WV2 Pocket Park - West Village - 2 1.2
P- WV3 Pocket Park - West Village - 3 0. 57
P- WV4 Pocket Park - West Village - 4 0. 54
New sheet added due to font size
change
48 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 300
Community Parks
Number Changed
TABLE 4. 5
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS PHASE 2 PARK DESIGNATION
Table Changed
PARK lit PARK NAME ACREAGE MILE QUIMBY OWNERSHIP
ACT
COMMUNITY PARK
411. LINEAR PARK
LP1 Linear Park 1 14. 01 1. 5 RD 2062
LP2 Linear Park 2 2. 57 28 RD 2062
LP3 Linear Park 3 1. 40 0. RD 2062
LP4 Linear Park 4 0. 70 0.4 RD 2062
LP5 Linear Park 5 5. 61 0. 46 RD 2062
LP6 Linear Park 6 0. 95 0. 14 RD 2062
LP7 Linear Park 7 0. 73 0.9 RD 2062
LP9 Linear Park 9 16. 69 1. 71 RD 2062
LP1O Linear Park 10 2.6 0. 18 RD 2062
LP11 Linear Park 11 1. 63 0. 24 RD 2062
OPEN SPACE
TOTAL PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND LAKES
PHASE 2 BOUNDARY
474. 98
915. 08
L14 lakel4 11. 62
L15 Lakel5 19. 28
L16 Lake16 10. 30
L17 Lake17 8. 12
L18 Lake18 14. 31
L19 lakel4 22. 66
L20 Lake 20 6. 48
L21 Lake 21 18. 43
122 Lake 22 5. 17
L23 Lake 23 17. 05
L24 Lake 24 9. 55
L25 Lake 25 53. 18
L26 Lake 26 6. 53
Linear Park 11 Added &
Acreage Changed
Total included
New table added
New sheet added due to font size
change
REVISION
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 49 301
CHAPTER
4 :
PROPOSED
PARKS
PLAN &
PARK
CONCEPTSMASTER
FIGURE
4. -
PHASE
2QUIMBY
ACT
PARK
DESIGNATI
ON
MAP Neighborhood
park
remo4
ved
Font
size
is
enlarged
to
be
11 for
ADA ompliance. c
PARK #
PARK
NAME
ACREAGE
QUIMBY OWNERSHIP
ACT
figa
N
eighborhood
Parks
N1
Neighborhood
Park
1 6. 2
N2
Neighborhood
Park
2 CITY
12. 47
N3
v
N5
Neighborhood
Park
3 Neighborhood
Park
5 14. 36 7.9
X X
RD
2062 CITY
N6
Ne
ighborhood
Park
6 5. 2
X
RD
2062
N7
N
eighbo rhoPaod
rk 5. 7
36 X
RD
2062
N8 N9
Ne
ighborhood
Park
8 N
eighborhood
Park Schoo9
l
Sites
10. 5. 2 4. 0
0 X X X
RD
2062 CITY
N
BANTA
UNIFIED
SCH
OOL
DISTRICT Pa
Community
rks
97. 14
C4
Community
Park
4* *
32. 53
x
CITY
C5
Community
Park
5 21. 60
x
CITY
Co
Cb
mmunity
Park
15. 6
01 CITY
Lev
C7
ee
Trail * * *
728. 00
7,
x
RD
2062
op
Es —
Phase
2 CoLimits
mmunity
park
renamed
Highlighted number
revised
Numbe Changer
d
Highlighted number
revised
N8ownership changed Specified
district
name
C1
changed
to
C4
QUIMBY
CA
ACT
LCULATION
STANDARD
11.„
HA
E
2 CALLS
DIFFERENCE
DWELLING
UNITS
10, 791
PO3.
PULATION
pe0
r
DU
32,23
COMMUNITY
PARKS (
C)
3 acres/ 1000
97. 12 97. acres
14 a
cres 0.
02 acres
NEIGHBORHOODPARKS (
N )
acre2
s/
1000
64. 75
acres
70. 62
acres
875.
a
cres
TOTAL
C &
N
PARKS
5 ACRES/ 1000
161. 87
ACRES 167.
76 ACRES
5. 89
ACRES
Sizes
and
locations
of
parks
subject
cha
to
nge
through
Neighbor
approval.
e
velopment
t'lan
pro
cess
subject
to
rev
iew
an
Revised
te
xt (
added)
Neighb
orhood
park
pocket
park/ lak
e
added
and
L20 changed
location
SchootesCa
culati
on: #
of
Scho
ols
x
2. 5
acres =
t
otal
acres
Co
mmunity
P
ark
4 acr eag e
does
not
include
w
etland
area. When
a
park
is
adj
ent ac
to
the
l
eve,
a
20'
distance
from
the
t
ofe
levee
is
n
ot
includ
inedpark
acrea
ge
calculati
LeveeTraons.
il
Calculation:
Total
Linear
Feet
x
30'
width =
t
otal
sq
ft (
43 ,
560
sq
ft =
1 acre)
T
otal
Miles =
7. Mil
es
The
30'
wide
levee
trail
has
been
used
to
calculate
acreage
of
th
Quimbye
Act
and
d
nooes t
include
the
levee slo
pes
or
20 -
foot
levee
toe.
The
a
pplicant
intends
to
regrade
the
feder
al
l
evee
into
awaterside
bench
which
will
be
mainta
ined
by
Reclama tio
n
District
2062.
Ther
e
will
be
no
public
access
to
the
le
vee,
only
the
waterside
bench.
In
situations
where
the
acreage
exceeds
the
Quimby
Act
requirem
ents,
individual
parks
may
be
reduc
ed
in
size
at
a
later
date
as
long
as
the
function
ality
of
the
park
is
aaintained.
Additiona
lly,
if
unit
coun
t
increases
or
decreases,
the population
estim
ates
may
lso
change
accordingly
which
will
further
alter
the
tot
al
p
arkacrege
requirements
up
or
down.
50 I
RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE
2 PARKS
AND
OPEN
SPACE
MASTER
PLAN
302
ORG FIUNAL 4.
URE
5 -'
HASt 2M
AP
CIRCUL
AIIUN
ELEVATED
TRAIL
Hikers
and
Bicyclists
CLASS I
BIKE
PATH
Separated
from
Automobile
traffic
CLASS
II
BIKE
LANE
Striped
and
Signed
Lane
onRoadway
CLASS
III RO
BIKE
UTE
Signage
onRoadway PEDESTRIAN
TRAIL
PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTION
BIKE
SIGNAGE WAYFINDING STAG
EQUESTRIAN
ING
AREA
PHASE 2
LIMITS
MM
MIi
All
bike
signage
and wayfinding
will
include
City
logo
Adding aPedestrian
Trail
along
the
new
neighborho
od
park
CHAPTER
4 :
RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE 2
303
REVISION
CHAPTER
4 :
FIGURE
4. 5 -
PHASE
2CIRCULATIO
N
MAP
ELEVATED
TRAIL
Hikers
and
Bicyclists
M
CLASS
I
BIKE SeparaPATH
ted
Automo
from
traffic
bile
CLASS
IILAN
BIKE
E
Striped
and
La
Signed
ne Roaon
dway
CLASS
III
BIKE
ROUTE
Signage
Roa dwaon
y
PEDESTRIAN
TRAIL CONN
PEDESTRIAN
ECTION SIGN
BIKE WAYFINAGE DING STAG
EQUESTRIAN
ING
AREA
PHASE
2 LIMITS
In.
M..
All
bike
signage
and wayfinding
will
include
City
logo
r•I •
I •• Y .
elk
04 IL
Adding
aPedestrian
Trail
along
the
new
neighborhood
p
ark
i
N.
I- ." ••
S
s
4 RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE
2 304
ORIGINAL
CHAPTER
4 :
FIGURE
4. 6 -
PHASE
2 SAFE
ROUTES TO
SCHOOLS
BICYCLE
PATH PEDESTRIANPATH
PHASE
2 LIMITS
a.
OD
as
r I
r
r
it
I
OW
O.
Adding
aPedestrian
Trail
along
the
new
neighborhood
park
S
RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE
2 305
REVISION
CHAPTER
4 :
PR
FIGURE
4. 6 -
PHASE
2 SAFE
ROUTES TO
SCHOOLS
BICYCLE
PATH
PEDESTRIAN
PATH
PHASE
2 LIMITS
MS IM
P
f
Ja •
Ivo
r,••co ; ".'
11 • "
r4\
4\„
Adding
a
Ped
estrian Trail
along
the
new
neighb
orhood
park
RIVER
ISLANDS
PHASE
2 306
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS w ands
ORIGINAL
COMMUNITY PARK 1
Note:
considered waters
Park 1
waters of the U. S., US., a fDAGE FEMOVE D agency. The boundary of the we reference. In collaboration with he ban Joaquin County Louncii ot overnme IatL(.h4, the wetiancis have been protected by a 5' high, 50' wide earthen berm. A access and protect the wetlands will be developed during and other governing agencies. No public access will be a be left in a natural condition with no water to body conta For illustrative purposes only
PARK AMENITIES
4) Baseball Fields
6) Tennis Courts
1) Multi -court
On -Site Parking Lot
Restroom
Main Playground wit
Wetland Overloo
Shade Struc
Picnic Areas
Access to
Spray
pe anent treatme
pa planning phases wi
wed to the wetlands. Al
allowed.
o discourage public
input from the City
etlands edges will
plash Pad
tur Benches, Tables and BBQ' s
Open Space
vee Trail with Exercise Equipment
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY PARK:
31. 9 ACRES
307
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes only only
PARK AMENITIES
4) Softball Fields
1) Baseball Fields
2) Basketball Courts
Storage Space for Sports ipment
Concessions/ Restroom ' ilding
On -Site Parking Lot
Main Playground th Splash Pad
Shade Structur:., Benches, Tables and BBQ' s
Access to Li . r Trail
Spraypa
COMMUNITY PARK:
22. 5 ACRES
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 308
ORIGINAL
PARK AMENITIES
3) Soccer Fields
1) Football sized sports field
2) Pickleball Courts
2) Tennis Courts
2) Bocce BaII Courts
1) Basketball Court
On -Site Parking Lo
Playground
Restroom Bu
Benches
Shade
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS COMMUNITY PARK 3
PAGE REMOVED
ructures and Picnic Tables
COMMUNITY PARK:
15. 0 ACRES
J..
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
309
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION
STANDARD COMMUNITY PARK AMENITIES
All community parks ( outside of will include the
following base amenities. Other amenities will be determined during the park concept design review process. They will be based on the overall community required facilities and space available in the park.
On -Site Parking Lot
Restroom
2-5 and 5- 12 Playgrounds
Shade Structures, Benches, Tables and BBQ' s
Picnic Areas & Open Space
Access to Levee Trail when applicable
Exercise Equipment
Perimeter walk
COMMUNITY PARKS
Community Park 4 - 31. 9 ACRES
Revised text
added all
amenities
together)
Community Park Numter Changed
The following am ities are considered for the community parks, howev , changes to sizes, locations and programming are subje o change and update based on coordination with aseball/ Softball, multi -purpose field, and tennis
aseball, lighted softball, (2) lighted rectangular fields, pickleball
ricket & multi -use fields
Community park designs will be submitted through the process as outlined in TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE and in
combination will include all facilities and amenities as listed in TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION.
Note: Community Park 4 acreage does not include the extent of wetlands within the park. The wetlands are considered waters of the U. S., and are protected from public contact owned and maintained by a public agency. The boundary of the wetlands is delineated by environmental documents and incorporated by reference. In collaboration with the San Joaquin County Council of Governments SJCOG), the wetlands have been protected by a 5' high, 50' wide earthen berm. A permanent treatment to discourage public access and protect the wetlands will be developed during park planning phases with input from the City and other governing agencies. No public access will be allowed to the wetlands. All wetlands edges will be left in a natural condition with no water to body contact allowed.
50 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Fit all 3 parks on
310
one sheets
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL COMMUNITY PARK 4 - LEVEE TRAILS
Levee trail along a public street
Levee trail along private property
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Bose Shoulder
Paved Levee Trail
loss II Equestrian Troll
Levee trail along a cul- de- sac
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Coss II Aggregate Base Shoulder
wed Levee Trail
lass II Equestrian Trod
I -
4. 60.
PARK AMENITIES
All- weather Paving ( 12' paved trail with 4' shoulder) Informational Kiosks
Overlook Views
Site furnishings and exercise equipment
Equestrian Trail ( 6' class II aggregate base on edge of paved trail) Levee trail along a park
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Base Shoulder
eyed Levee Trail
lass II Equestrian Trail
Levee trail along open space
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Bose Shoulder
clued Levee Trail
lam II Equesh, an Trail
The applicant intends to regrade the federal levee into a waterside bench which will be maintained by Reclamation District 2062. There will be no public access to the levee, only the waterside bench.
A
LEVEE TRAILS:
28. 0 ACRES
53 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Text removed
311
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS Community Park C4
Changed to C7
Levee trail along a public street
Levee trail along private property
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Base Shoulder
Paved Levee Trail
rClass II Equestrian Trail
iEW tNM f
New levee
NTTI VARIES
EVEI
StlFUEM
Levee trail along a cul- de- sac
Shoulder wllh Trail Amenities
Cass II Aggregate Base Shoulder
Paved Levee Trail
Class II Equestrian Trail
For illustrative purposes only
PARK AMENITIES
All- weather Paving ( 12' paved trail with 4' shoulder) Informational Kiosks
Overlook Views
Site furnishings and exercise equipment
Equestrian Trail ( 6' class II aggregate base on edge of paved trail) e rye
Eef( LfHT KCO
REVISION
Levee trail along a park
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Base Shoulder
aved Levee Trail
lass II Equestrian Trod
Levee trail along open space
The applicant intends to regrade the federal levee into a waterside bench which will be maintained by Reclamation District 2062.
Text removed
Shoulder with Trail Amenities
Class II Aggregate Bose Shoulder
Paved Levee Trail
lass II Equesman Trail
LEVEE TRAILS:
28. 0 ACRES
No diagram
51 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 312
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes only
PARK AMENITIES
1) Basketball Court
Sensory Play Equipment & PI
Aromatic/ Herb Garden - " S
Lake Overlook & Access w'
Labyrinth Path- "Sight"
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Open Sp e
ayg nd - " Touch"
Taste"
Wind Chimes - " Hear"
j.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
7. 18 ACRES
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 313
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 2
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative • ur• oses onl
PARK AMENITIES
Sensory Garden
Agility Training
Small and Large Dog Park
Pet Wash Stations
Playground
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Open Sp
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
12. 47 ACRES
INI LL
t1111111111R
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 314
OR G NAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 3
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes on)
PARK AMENITIES
Playground with Shade Sail
Outdoor Adult Fitness Equipmen
Adult Strength Training
1) Soccer Field
1) Multi -purpose Field
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Open Sp. e
iJ, \-----
cii
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
4. 0 ACRES
tt
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 6 315
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 4
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes onl
PARK AMENITIES
1) Soccer Field
On -site Parking
Outdoor Gathering/ Perform
Shaded Walkwaysv
ce Space
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
5. 4 ACRES
316
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes onl
PARK AMENITIES
1) Basketball Court
2) Multi -Purpose Field
Agility Training
Small Dog Park
Large Dog Park
Playground
Benches
Shade Structur
Picnic Table
BBQ
Open ace
i'---
r"
IIIIIIIItl
a • __
YIIIIIIIIIR 40
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
7. 8 ACRES
us
ti
J
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 317
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS For illustrative purposes onl
PARK AMENITIES
1) Basketball Courts
1) Multi use - court
Sundial Feature
Nature Walk
Playground
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Connect'
Open
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
6. 5 ACRES
318
ORIGINAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 7
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes only
PARK AMENITIES
Playground ( 2-5 years)
Playground ( 5- 12 years)
Playground
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Tree Grove
Open Space
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
5. 4 ACRES
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 319
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 8
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes only
PARK AMENITIES
1) Adult Soccer Field
1) Multi - Purpose Field
1) Pickleball Court
Playground
Benches
Shade Structure
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Connection
Open Sp
evee Trail
I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
5. 30 ACRES
i
320
OR G NAL CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 9
PAGE REMOVED
For illustrative purposes onl
PARK AMENITIES
Perimeter Walk
Playground
Benches
Picnic Tables
BBQ
Open Space
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK:
4. 0 ACRES
IMP
X0111
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 321
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 52 REVISION CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
STANDARD NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AMENITIES
All neighborhood parks will include the following base
amenities. Other amenities will be determined during the park concept design review process. They will be based on the overall community required facilities and space available in the park.
2-5 or 5- 12 Playgrounds
Shade structures, benches, tables and bbq
Picnic areas & open space
Access to levee trail when applicable
Lake access when applicable
Perimeter walk
No bathrooms or parking lot
Neighborhood park designs will be submitted through the process as outlined in TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE and in combination will include all facilities and amenities as listed in TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION.
Revised text (added all
amenities together)
N3 Changed/ N4 Removed
N1 Changed
Neighborhood Park 2 - 12. 47 ACRES
Neighborhood Park 3 - 14. 36 ACRES
Neighborhood Park 1 - 6. 24 ACRES Neighborhood Park 5 - 7.9 ACRES Fit park 1- 3 & 5
322
on one sheets
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Neighborhood Park 6 - 5. 20 ACRES
Neighborhood Park 8 - 5. 20 ACRES
Neighborhood Park 7 - 5. 36 ACRES
Fit 6-9 parks on one \
sheets
Neighborhood Park 9 - 4. 0 ACRES
53 I RIVER ISLAND
323
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS ORIGINAL
THROUGH BLOCK POCKET PARK STREET ACCESS POCKET PARK
SMALL LOT LAKE ACCESS POCKET PARK LARGE LAKE ACCESS OPEN SPACE POCKET PARK For illustrative purposes onl
PARK AMENITIES
Pocket parks may include
Access Paths
Benches
Picnic Tables
Lake Access Docks
Small Open Spaces
Text revised ( added) POCKET PARKS 1- 37:
20. 0ACRES
63 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 324
Diagram removed
REV s ON CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS
POCKET PARKS
STANDARD POCKET PARK AMENITIES
All pocket parks will include the following base amenities.
Other amenities will be determined during the park concept design review process. They will be based on the overall community required facilities and space available in the park.
Pocket parks may include:
Access Paths
Benches
Small Open Spaces
Pocket park designs will be submitted through the process as outlined in TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE and in
combination will include all facilities and amenities as listed in TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION.
More detailed
amenities
STREET ACCESS POCKET PARK
SMALL LOT LAKE ACCESS POCKET PARK
CORNER AND END POCKET PARKS LARGE LAKE ACCESS OPEN SPACE POCKET RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN I 54 325
ORIGINAL
LINEAR PARKS 1-0:
48. ACRES
PARK AMENITIES
Linear parks may include:
Access Paths
All -Weather Trails
Benches
Picnic Tables
Lake Access
Interpretive Signage
Small Open Spaces
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS Text revised ( added)
Good Neighbor Fence Pedestrian Trail , Good
RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MAS R PLAN I 64 326
CHAPTER 4 : PROPOSED PARKS & OPEN SPACE SYSTEM & CONCEPTS REVISION
LINEAR PARKS
STANDARD LINEAR PARK AMENITIES <
All linear parks will include the following base amenities.
Other amenities will be determined during the park concept design review process. They will be based on the overall community required facilities and space available in the park.
Access Paths
Benches
Small Open Spaces
Linear park designs will be submitted through the process as outlined in TABLE 4. 3 - AGENCY REVIEW TABLE and in
combination will include all facilities and amenities as listed in TABLE 4. - PHASE 2 PARK FACILITIES BY LOCATION.
EXAMPLE LINEAR PARK
More detailed
amenities
Diagram enlarged
55 I RIVER ISLANDS PHASE 2 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 327
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
328
ITEM 4. 17
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT LATHROP LANDING COMMUNITY PARK
IMPROVEMENTS WITH CONDITIONS FROM RIVER
ISLANDS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, LOCATED WITHIN
THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT OF RIVER ISLANDS
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Lathrop Landing Community Park Improvements with Conditions
from River Islands Construction, LLC, Located within
the Town Center District of River Islands
SUMMARY:
River Islands Construction, LLC ( River Islands) has completed construction of the Lathrop Landing Community Park ( C1 Park) located within the Town Center District of River Islands. A vicinity map of the improvements is included as Attachment " B".
Staff has inspected the improvements and the City Engineer has deemed them substantially complete and in accordance with the approved plans and City specifications, with the following exceptions: ( 1) the monument sign, which is still being manufactured, and ( 2) certain safety enhancements that were requested by staff and are pending completion ( Remaining Improvements). The safety enhancements include some additional fencing near the basketball courts, housekeeping pads for all utility structures, and stabilizing the decomposed granite so the material cannot be removed. Staff finds that these requested safety enhancements are not significant enough to prevent acceptance of the C1 Park. The approximate value of the improvements proposed for acceptance is $ 6,92,00. 31, as shown in the GASB 34 Report included in Attachment " C".
River Islands has provided a one- year warranty bond and unconditional lien releases for the completed improvements proposed for acceptance. Staff recommends that City Council accept the completed public improvements for the Lathrop Landing Community Park and accept the Remaining Improvements contingent on staff verification of their completion and receipt of unconditional lien releases for the Remaining Improvements.
BACKGROUND:
On March 27, 2007, City Council approved Vesting Tentative Map ( VTM) 3694, which was amended with updated Conditions of Approval ( COA) on June 1, 2015. On March 20, 2024, the City of Lathrop Planning Commission approved the Neighborhood Development Plan for the Town Center District within Phase 1 of River Islands. On March 25, 2024, City Council approved Tract 4167 Final Map ( Tract 4167) within the Town Center District for Multi -Family and Commercial lots. The final map dedicated the C1 Park parcel to the City of Lathrop as required by the Quimby Act. The C1 Park 329
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT LATHROP LANDING COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS WITH
CONDITIONS FROM RIVER ISLANDS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, LOCATED
WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT OF RIVER ISLANDS
is within the geographic boundary of VTM 3694, Tract 4167, and Phase 1 of River Islands.
Construction of the Lathrop Landing Community Park is substantially complete. The only items remaining are: (1) installation of the monument sign, which is currently being manufactured, and ( 2) completion of staff -requested safety enhancements.
These improvements were identified during the inspection process as necessary to enhance user safety in the park but are not significant enough to prevent acceptance of the C1 Park. All other improvements have been inspected by staff and deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and City specifications by the City Engineer. The approximate value of the improvements proposed for acceptance is $ 6,92,00. 31as shown in the GASB 34 Report.
River Islands has provided a one- year warranty bond in the amount of $712, 80. 6 0869579) to cover any repairs or replacements due to defective materials or workmanship for one year beginning with this acceptance. River Islands has also submitted unconditional lien releases for the completed improvements. Staff will confirm installation of the monument sign, completion of the staff requested safety enhancements, and receipt of unconditional lien releases for the Remaining Improvements.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has inspected the improvements listed in the GASB 34 Report and confirmed they have been completed in accordance with City specifications and approved plans, with the exception of the monument sign installation and the staff -requested safety enhancements.
Staff recommends that City Council accept the completed public improvements listed in the GASB 34 Report and accept the Remaining Improvements contingent on staff verification of their completion and receipt of unconditional lien releases for the Remaining Improvements. River Islands has submitted unconditional lien releases for the completed improvements and a one- year warranty bond for the improvements proposed for acceptance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
River Islands Public Financing Authority ( RIPFA) will maintain the park at no additional cost to the City pursuant to the existing Maintenance Agreement with the City. The warranty bond, which is active for one year from the date of this acceptance, covers any repairs or replacements due to defective materials or workmanship for any of the improvements that become necessary during this period. The City' s Service Maintenance CFD 2013- 1 has been established to fund the maintenance and operating costs of the adjacent streets.
330
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT LATHROP LANDING COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS WITH
CONDITIONS FROM RIVER ISLANDS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, LOCATED
WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT OF RIVER ISLANDS
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Lathrop Landing Community Park Improvements with Conditions from River Islands Construction, LLC, Located within the Town Center District of River Islands
B. Vicinity Map
C. GASB 34 Report - River Islands Lathrop Landing Community Park 331
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT LATHROP LANDING COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS WITH
CONDITIONS FROM RIVER ISLANDS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, LOCATED
WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT OF RIVER ISLANDS
APPROVALS:
2/ 1/ 25
Bellal Nabizadah' Date
Assistant Engineer
Bra aylor
City ngineer
Foe
Date
a) ibo, s
I2. 1•Zo2S
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
I2• I•ZoZ.
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
IL• 4. 75
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
332
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT
LATHROP LANDING COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS WITH CONDITIONS
FROM RIVER ISLANDS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN
CENTER DISTRICT OF RIVER ISLANDS
WHEREAS, on March 27, 2007, the City of Lathrop City Council approved Vesting Tentative Map ( VTM) 3694, which was amended with updated Conditions of Approval ( COA) on June 1, 2015; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2024, the City of Lathrop Planning Commission approved the Neighborhood Development Plan for the Town Center District within Phase 1 of River Islands; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2024, City Council approved Tract 4167 Final Map Tract 4167) within the Town Center District for Multi - Family and Commercial lots, which also dedicated the Lathrop Landing Park parcel to the City of Lathrop in accordance with the Quimby Act; and
WHEREAS, River Islands Construction, LLC ( River Islands) has completed construction of the Lathrop Landing Community Park ( C1 Park) located within the Town Center District of River Islands in accordance with the approved plans and City specifications, with the exception of: (1) the monument sign, which is still being manufactured, and ( 2) certain staff -requested safety enhancements ( Remaining Improvements); and
WHEREAS, the safety enhancements include some additional fencing near the basketball courts, housekeeping pads for all utility structures, and stabilizing the decomposed granite so the material cannot be removed; and WHEREAS, staff finds that these requested safety enhancements are not significant enough to prevent acceptance of the C1 Park; and WHEREAS, the park improvements have been inspected by staff and deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and City specifications by the City Engineer, with the exception of the monument sign and the staff -requested safety enhancements; and
WHEREAS, the approximate value of the improvements proposed to be accepted is $ 6,92,00. 31, as shown in the GASB 34 Report included as Attachment C" in the City Manager' sReport that accompanied this Resolution; and WHEREAS, River Islands has submitted unconditional lien releases and as - built drawings for the completed improvements; and
333
WHEREAS, staff will confirm installation of the monument sign, completion of the staff requested safety enhancements, and receipt of unconditional lien releases for the Remaining Improvements ; and
WHEREAS, River Islands has provided a one- year warranty bond ( No. 0869579) in the amount of $ 712, 80. 6to cover replacement and/ orrepair of the improvements as a result of defective materials, equipment, or defective workmanship for a period of one year from the date of acceptance; and WHEREAS, River Islands Public Financing Authority ( RIPFA) will maintain the park at no additional cost to the City pursuant to the existing Maintenance Agreement with the City, and the City' s
Service Maintenance CFD 2013- 1has been established
to fund the maintenance and operating costs of the adjacent streets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the Lathrop Landing Community Park Improvements located within the Town Center District of River Islands and accepts the monument sign and the staff -requested safety enhancements contingent upon staff verification of their completion and receipt of final unconditional lien releases. 334
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 8th day of December 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 335
336
Iver9silaRiffrida
Center
Community
Park (
C1)
A
S-BUILTS ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANT .
NIT
COST
A.
SitePreparation
1 Site
Grading (
Rough/ Fine)
SF
387, 450
0. 95
2 Erosion
Control
SF
387, 450
0. 18
3 Storm
Drain
Tie -
In
EA
6 1, 500 .
00 4
Storm
Drain
Manhole
EA
2 2, 000 .
00 5
Storm
Drain
Inlet
EA
24 2, 000 .
00 6
Storm
Drain
Curb
Inlet (
Parking
Lot)
EA
2 2, 500 .
00 7
Storm
Drain
Inlet (
Splash
Pad)
EA
7 1, 500. 00
8 Storm
Drain
Clean -
out
EA
2 1, 000 .
00 9
Storm
Drain
Manhole -
Grade
Rings
EA
4 1, 500 .
00 10
6"
Storm
Drain
Line (
Splash
Pad
drains
to
Basin)
LF
78 35 .
00 11
8"
Storm
Drain
Line
LF
1, 921
40 .
00 12
15"
Storm
Drain
Line
LF
497
50. 0
13 Sto
18"
rm
Drain
Line
LF
54 60 .
00 14
18"
Storm
Drain
Line -
Demo (
Removed)
LF
0 30 .
00 15
Sewer
Tie -
In
EA
1 1,500. 00
16 Sewer
Manhole
EA
1 2, 000 .
00 17
Sewer
Area
Drain (
Restroom
Shower)
EA
1 1,00 .
00 18
Sewer
Clean -
out
EA
8 1, 000 .
00 19
Sewer
M
anhole -
Grade
Rings
EA
1 1, 500. 00
20 6"
Sewer
Line
LF
242
35. 00
21 Potable
Water
Tie -
In
EA
1 2, 000 .
00 22
3"
Water
M
eter
EA
1 15, 000 .
00 4"
23 Backflow
w/
Weather
Blanket
EA
1 12, 000 .
00 24
6"
Water
Line
LF
191
35 .
00 25
1-/ 2"
Water
Line
toDrinking
Fountain
LF
346
5. 00
26 2" 1-/
Water
Line
to
Restroom
LF
34 5 .
00 SUB -
TOTAL
B. Flatwo
rk /
Surfacing /
Walls
1 Natural
colored
6" Conc.
Flatwork ( Site
Finish "
B"
SF
34, 755
13 .
00 2
Colored
Concrete
FlatworkSplash
Pad (
Site
Finish "
W -
Z")
SF
3, 299
25 .
00 337
3 Artificial
Turf
over
Concrete
Base (
Playground
Slope
area) (
Site
Finish "
G ")
SF
102
40 .
00 4
Concrete
Stairs (
Site
Feature #
11)
EA
10 500 .
00 5
ADA
Curb
Ramp (
Site
Feature #
41)
EA
2 2, 500 .
00 6
ADA
Detectable
Warning
Surface (
Sit
e
Feature #
40)
SF
102
25 .
00 7
Deepened
Edge
atPlayground
Ramp (
Site
Feature #
12)
LF
65 55 .
00 8
Thickened
Edge
atPlayground (
Site
Feature #
3)
LF
337
55 .
00 9Edge Thickened
atPlayground
Slope
Synthetic
Turf (
Site
Feature #
19)
LF
10 55 .
00 10
Thickened
Edge
atPlayground
Slope
Rubber
Surfacing (
Site
Featur
e #
20)
LF
14 55 .
00 11
Thickened
Edge
atPlayground
Planting
Area (
Site
Feature #
15)
LF
10 55 .
00 12
DG
Pad (
SiteC") Finish "
SF
5, 023
005.
13 Steel
Edging (
Site
Feature #
25)
LF
264
005.
14 Asphalt
Parking
Lot (
Site
Finish "
A)
SF
21, 194
6 .
00 15
Parking
Lot
Striping (
Site
Feature #
44, #
45, #
46, #
62)
LS
1 40, 000 .
00 16
Parking
Lot
Curb (
Site
Feature #
6)
LF
945
40 .
00 17
Parking
Lot
Curb
and
Gutter (
Site
Feature #
7)
LF
315
40 .
00 Te
18 nnis/ Pickleball
Court (
Asphalt/ Surfacing/ Striping) (
Site
Finish "
D")
SF
14, 400
15. 00
19 Basketball
Court (
Asphalt/ Surfacing/ Striping) (
Site
Finish "
E")
SF
5, 717
15 .
00 Fitne
20 ssRubberized
Surfacing (
Site
Finish " J" )
SF
1, 594
23 .
00 21Playground
Safety
Surfacing -
Rubberized
Play
Surface (
Site
Finish "
K -
U")
SF
11, 556
26 .
00 22
Boulder -
M
edium (
Site
Feature #
39)
EA
13 496 .
57 23
Boulder -
Large (
Site
Feature #
39)
EA
11 749 .
31 24
12"
Concrete
Mow
Curb (
Site
Feature #
1)
LF
2, 722
31. 84
25 12"
PlaygroWide
und
Curb (
Site
Feature #
2)
LF
231
60. 75
26 18"
WideFree- Standing
Seat
WaII (
Site
Feature #
4)
LF
134
200 .
00 27
18"
Wide
Retaining
Seat
Wall (
Site
Feature #
5)
LF
79 250 .
00 28
Washed
River
Cobble (
3"- 4) (
Site
AA" ) Finish "
SF
440
5.0 29
Washed
River
Cobble (
6"- 8) (
Site F" ) Finish "
SF
873
5.0 SUB -
TOTAL
C.
Furnishings /
Equipment / Structu
res
Be1
nches (
Site
Feature #
21)
EA
19 2, 329 .
33 2
Re
Trash
ceptacles (
Site
Feature #
22)
EA
8 1,91 .
50 3
Recycling
Receptacles (
Site
Feature #
23)
EA
8 1, 277 .
33 4Rectangular
Picnic
Table (
Site
Feature #
24)
EA
10 2, 347 .
83 5
BBQ -
Family (
Site
Feature #
32)
EA
2 4, 834 .
63 6
Dog
Waste
Dispenser (
Site
Feature #
64)
EA
4 800 .
00 7
Drinking
Fountain
w/ Dog
Bowl (
Site
Feature #
26)
EA
1 12, 305. 50
8 Bike
Rack (
Site Featu
re #
31)
EA
6 500 .
00 338
9 Restroom (
Site
Feature #
36)
LS
1 427, 659. 00
10 Shade
Sail
Structure (
Site
Feature #
37)
EA
2 52, 459 .
50 11
Splash
Pad
Features (
Splash
Pad
Feature #
A -
P)
LS
1 396, 000 .
00 12
10'
Basketball
hoop (
Site
Feature #
27)
EA
2 7, 500. 00
13 Tennis
Court
Posts/ Net (
Site
Feature #
28)
EA
2 5, 000.0
14 FitnessEquipment & Install (
Fitness
Feature #
1-4)
LS
1 25, 000 .
00 15Playground
Equipment &
Install (
Playground
Feature
A -
Z)
LS
1 695, 000 .
00 3.
16 5'
High
Guardrail
Fence (
Site
Feature #
8)
LF
86 65 .
00 17
Handrail
at
Stair (
Site
Feature #
14)
LF
24 100. 00
18 Handrail
at
Ramp (
Site
Feature #
9 -
Includes
6" conc.
Curb)
LF
141
150 .
00 19
6'
High
Tubular
Steel
Fence (
along
RIP) (
Site
Feature #
18)
LF
616
85 .
00 20
10'
Chainlink
Fence -
Tennis
Court (
Site
Feature #
16)
LF
670
110 .
00 21
10'
Chainlink
Gate -
Tennis
Court (
Site
Feature #
17)
EA
4 1, 000 .
00 22
City
of
Lathrop
Park
R
ules
Sign (
Site
Feature #
29)
EA
5 750 .
00 23
Pollinator
Garden
SignageA (
Site
Feature #
33)
EA
1 1, 500 .
00 24
Pollinator
Garden
SignageB (
Site
Feature #
34)
EA
1 1, 500 .
00 25
Park
Entry
Sign (
w/ Footing) (
Site
Feature #
30)
EA
1 15, 800 .
00 26
Pollinator
Garden
Arbor (
Site
Feature #
47)
EA
1 40, 000 .
00 27
Free -
Standing
Vine
TrellisButterflies (
Site
Feature #
48)
EA
1 500 . 7,
00 28
Free -
Standing
Vine
TrellisHummngbird (
Site
Feature #
49)
EA
1 7, 500 .
00 29
Free -
Standing
Tre
Vine
llisBee (
Site
Feature #
50)
EA
1 7, 500. 00
30 Free -
Standing
Vine
TrellisButterfly (
Site
Feature #
51)
EA
1 7, 500. 00
Free -
31 Standing
Vine
TrellisDaisies (
Site
Feature #
52)
EA
1 500 . 7,
00 32
Free -
Standing
Vine
TrellisFlowers (
Site
Fe
ature #
53)
EA
1 7, 500 .
00 33
ADA
Parking
Sign (
Site
Feature #
42)
EA
4 500 .
00 34
ADA
Tow -
A
way
Signage (
Site
Feature #
43)
EA
2 500 .
00 SUB -
TOTAL
D.Lighting 1
Electrical
Pedestal
EA
1 20, 000.
2 Park
Sign
Light
EA
2 3, 739 .
00 3
Park
Sign
Light
Conduit &
Wire
LS
1 3, 523 .
00 4
Park
Path
Lighting
EA
16 12, 025 .
17 5
Park
Path
Light
Conduit &
Wire
LS
1 40, 800 .
00 6
Parking
Lot
Lighting
EA
10 12, 025 .
17 7
Parking
Lot
Lighting
Conduit &
Wire
LS
1 18, 614 .
00 8
Restroom
Conduit &
Wire
LS
1 10, 000 .
00 9
Shade
Sail
Outlets
EA
2 1, 000 .
00 339
10 Shade
Sail
Outlets
Conduit &
Wire
LS
1 6, 208. 00
SUB -
TOTAL
E.Planting 11
Soil Conditioning &
Amendments
SF
283, 834
0 .
55 2
Drill
Seed
Lawn
SF
222, 30
0 .
15 3
1 Gallon
Shrubs
EA
3,14
15 .
00 4
1Vine
Gallon
s
EA
14 15. 00
5 15
Gallon
Trees
EA
189
200 .
00 6
Bark
SF
61, 514
0 .
85 7
Root
Barrier
LF
2, 153
12 .
00 SUB -
TOTAL
F.Contro
Irrigation
ls &
Distribution
1 Irrigation
System
SF
283, 834
2 .
25 SUB -
TOTAL
G.Miscellaneous 1
M
aintenance (
60 Day)
SF
283, 834
0 .
10 2Mobilization/ De- mobilization (
NTE -
5%)
LS
1 290, 982 .
62 3
Bonding
LS
1 581, 965 .
24 SUB -
TOTAL
Items
not
included
as
a
part
of
this
estimate:
A. BPermits Utility C. Fee fe
City
es,
bond
fees
D. Engineering/ design E.
fees engineeSolis
ring
cost
NOTES: 1. 2.
CONSTRUCTION -
TOTAL
6,92,
F. Landscaping
Fees
G.
Joint
trench
H.
Easement
acquisitions
I.
Power
P
ole
Relocation
J.
This
project
is
a
lump
sum
contract
and
bids
shall
reflect
qty
and
dollar
cost
associate
d
to
complete
the
project
as
sh
own
in
the
approved
set. plan
Quantities
are
provided
for
reference
and
contractor
shall
ultimately
be
responsible
for
qty( s)
they
feel
ar
e
project
as
shown
on
theapproved plans.
Contractor
shall
provide
bid
costs
associated
with
each
line
item .
340
ITEM 5. 1
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING ( PUBLISHED NOTICE) TO
CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
LATHROP TO AMEND SECTION 10. 24. 030 TO TITLE
10 (" VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC") OF THE LATHROP
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE NO PARKING
AREAS
RECOMMENDATION: City Council to Consider the Following:
1. Hold a Public Hearing; and
2. Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance
to Amend Section 10. 24. 030 to Title 10
Vehicles and Traffic") of the Lathrop
Municipal Code to Designate No Parking Areas
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified necessary modifications and additions to the Lathrop Municipal Code Section ( LMC) 10. 24. 030 titled " Designated No Parking Areas" to support safer streets and a cleaner environment by addressing littering and loitering concerns.
Staff request that City Council hold a public hearing, consider all information and public testimony and, if determined to be appropriate, adopt the proposed Ordinance Attachment A) to amend Section 10. 24. 030 of the Lathrop Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to California Vehicle Code ( CVC) Section 22507, the City is required to establish no parking areas within City limits by Ordinance. Section 10. 24. 030 of the LMC allows the Lathrop Police Department to enforce the no parking areas.
Staff has identified necessary modifications and additions to LMC Section 10. 24. 030 to support safer streets and a cleaner environment by addressing littering and loitering concerns. Staff is requesting that City Council consider the approval of the proposed Ordinance to amend LMC Section 10. 24. 030 to add and modify street sections as described in Exhibit A to Attachment A.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the Ordinance will add and modify the no parking areas. This action is consistent with the intended and planned use of the roadways, shoulders, and street frontages. Staff recommends that Council approve the modifications and additions to the existing parking restrictions in the Lathrop Municipal Code as described in Exhibit A to Attachment A.
341
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING ( PUBLISHED NOTICE) TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO AMEND SECTION 10. 24. 030 OF THE LATHROP
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE NO PARKING AREAS
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is sufficient funding in Street Fund 2080 to cover the various costs associated with the additions and modifications to the no parking areas, including installation of signs.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. An Ordinance to Amend Section 10. 24. 030 to Title 10 (" Vehicles and Traffic") of the Lathrop Municipal Code to Designate No Parking Areas Exhibit A: Section 10. 24. 030 Designated No Parking Areas. 342
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING ( PUBLISHED NOTICE) TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO AMEND SECTION 10. 24. 030 OF THE LATHROP
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE NO PARKING AREAS
APPROVALS:
la61, 30a
Veronica Albarran Date
Assistant Engineer
BradDl aylor
City Engineer
Cari James
Finance Dirtctor
Thomas Hedegard
Deputy City Manager
Fz
1211/ 7o2S
Date
g/ s/ aoajr
Date
12• Z• 2oz. S
Date
I Z • Z • zo zs
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
343
ORDINANCE NO. 25 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO AMEND SECTION 10. 24. 030 TO TITLE 10 (" VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC") OF THE
LATHROP MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE NO PARKING AREAS
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Vehicle Code ( CVC) Section 22507, the City is required to establish No Parking Areas within the City limits by ordinance; and WHEREAS, staff has identified necessary modifications and additions to Lathrop Municipal Code Section ( LMC) 10. 24. 030 titled " Designated No Parking Areas" to support safer streets and a cleaner environment by addressing littering and loitering concerns; and
WHEREAS, staff request that the City Council consider amending LMC Section
10. 24. 030, as shown in Exhibit A incorporated by reference herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve amending Section 10. 24. 030 entitled " Designated No Parking Areas" of the Lathrop Municipal Code as shown in Exhibit A, incorporated by reference herein.
Section 1. The Lathrop Municipal Code is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
Section 2. Duty of Care This Ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the city or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care toward persons and property within or without the city so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsequent subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such a decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the unconstitutionality or invalidity of any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take legal effect 30 days from and after the date of its passage.
Section 5. Publication. Within fifteen days of the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall make a copy of this Ordinance to be published in full accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code.
344
THIS ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lathrop on the 8th day of December 2025, and was PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lathrop on the day of 20 , by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas
City Clerk
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
345
Language Removed will be shown in strikethrough
Revised Language will be shown in underline
Title 10. Vehicles and Traffic
Chapter 10. 24 PARKING
t...]
10. 24. 030 Designated No Parking Areas
EXHIBIT A
Upon amendment by ordinance prohibiting parking on certain streets and/ or highways within the corporate limits of the City, as depicted below, the Director of Public Works is directed to place appropriate signs and/ or markings sufficient to give adequate notice of such no parking areas. Until appropriate signs and/ or markings sufficient to give adequate notice of such no parking areas, as depicted below, is provided by the Director of Public Works, no enforcement of the provisions of this section shall occur.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Vehicle Code, the following no parking zones ( unless noted as time - limited parking) are created or affirmed if previously created in the corporate limits ofthe City of Lathrop:
Street Side Location
Academy Drive North Beginning at the centerline of Somerston Parkway, thence running easterly to the centerline ofRiver Bend Drive, an approximate distance of 2, 000 feet.
Barbara Terry Boulevard Both Beginning at the centerline of Spartan Way, thence running easterly to the centerline of Sunol Street, an approximate distance of 5, 860 feet.
Bewick Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Warbler Place, thence running southerly to the centerline of Isidore Way, an approximate distance of 170 feet.
Bluebird Street Both Beginning at the centerline of Spartan Way, thence running southerly to the centerline of Osprey Drive, an approximate distance of 180 feet.
Bosch Avenue Both Beginning at the centerline of Middlebury Drive, thence running northerly to the centerline of Mulholland Drive, an approximate distance of 1, 850 feet.
Briarstone Lane Both Entire length.
Brookhurst Boulevard Both Beginning at the centerline of Manthey Road, thence running westerly to the centerline of McKee Boulevard, an approximate distance of 1, 350 feet.
Business Park Court Both Entire length.
Callerton Avenue Both Entire length.
Cedar Ridge Court Southwest Beginning from the south end of the driveway to 14917 Cedar Ridge Court, thence running easterly an approximate distance of 30 feet.
Central Pacific Street Both Beginning at the centerline of Spartan Way, thence running southerly to the centerline of Albany Street, an approximate distance of 200 feet.
Christopher Way Both Beginning at the centerline of D' Arcy Parkway, thence running southwesterly an approximate distance of3, 000 feet.
Commercial Street Both Beginning at the centerline of Academy Drive, thence running northerly to the centerline of Marina Drive, an approximate distance of 1, 300 feet.
Crescent Moon Drive North Beginning at the centerline of McKee Boulevard, thence running easterly, an approximate distance of 50 feet.
D' Arcy Parkway North Entire length.
D' Arcy Parkway South Beginning at the centerline of Harlan Road, thence running easterly, an approximate distance of 450 feet. Allow 30 minute parking.
D' Arcy Parkway South Beginning at 450 feet east of the centerline of Harlan Road Boulevard, thence running easterly, an approximate distance of 6, 300 feet.
Dell' Osso Drive Both Entire length.
346
Street Side Location
Dos Reis Road Both Entire length.
Fifth Street East Beginning at the centerline of Thomsen Road, thence running southerly an approximate distance of 165 feet.
Fifth Street West Beginning at the centerline of Mingo Way, thence running southerly to the centerline of Louise Avenue, an approximate distance of 500 feet.
Fifth Street West Beginning at the centerline of N Street, thence running southerly to the centerline of O Street, an approximate distance of 400 feet. Prohibit parking between the hours of 8: 30 a. m. to 2: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday. Allow temporary loading/ unloading of vehicle passengers between the hours of 8: 00 a. m. to 8: 30 a. m. and 2: 30 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m., Monday through Friday. Allow parking between the hours of 3: 00 p. m. and 8: 00 a. m., Monday through Friday and anytime on Saturday and Sunday.
Golden Spike Trail West Beginning at the centerline of Brookhurst Boulevard, thence running north an approximate distance of 750 feet. Prohibit parking from the hours of 8: 00 a. m. to 5: 00 p. m., Monday through Friday. Allow parking between the hours of 5: 00 p. m. to 8: 00 a. m., Monday through Friday and anytime on Saturday and Sunday.
Golden Spike Trail East Beginning at the centerline of Brookhurst Boulevard, thence running north an approximate distance of 250 feet. Prohibit parking from the hours of 8: 00 a. m. to 5: 00 p. m., Monday through Friday. Allow parking between the hours of 5: 00 p. m. to 8: 00 a. m., Monday through Friday and anytime on Saturday and Sunday.
Golden Valley Parkway Both Entire length within city limits.
Glacier Street Both Entire length.
Harlan Road Both Beginning at the northerly city limits, thence running south to cul- de- sac.
Haverhill Lane Both Entire length.
Howland Road Both Entire length.
Imperial Drive West Beginning at the centerline of Holborn Drive, thence running southerly to Marina Drive roundabout, an approximate distance of 65 feet.
Isidore Way Both Beginning at the centerline of Stanford Crossing, thence running westerly to the centerline of Loon Street, an approximate distance of 930 feet.
Jefferson Way Both Entire length.
Johnson Ferry Road Both Beginning at the centerline of Golden Spike Trail, thence running easterly to centerline of Colonial Trail, an approximate distance of 1, 815 feet.
Lakeside Drive Both Entire length.
Lathrop Road Both Beginning at the centerline of Golden Valley Parkway, thence running easterly to the eastern city limits an approximate distance of 9, 500 feet.
Locomotive Street Both Beginning at the centerline of Golden Valley Parkway, thence running westerly to the centerline of Saybrook Street, an approximate distance of 200 feet.
Louise Avenue Both Entire length.
Madruga Road Both Beginning at the centerline of Yosemite Avenue, thence running westerly to the centerline of Glacier Street, an approximate distance of 770 feet.
Manthey Road Both Beginning at south city limits, thence running northerly to city limits an approximate distance of 28, 400 feet.
Marina Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Somerston Parkway, thence running easterly to the centerline of River Bend Drive, an approximate distance of2, 400 feet.
Marina Drive South Beginning at the centerline of Leto Way, thence running westerly to the centerline of Silver Springs Way, an approximate distance of 1, 050 feet.
McKee Boulevard Both Beginning at the centerline of Crescent Moon Drive, thence running northerly and southerly an approximate distance of 85 feet.
McKinley Avenue Both Entire length within City limits.
Mossdale Road Both Entire length within city limits.
Murphy Parkway Both Beginning at the centerline ofD' Arcy Parkway, thence running northerly to the end.
Murphy Parkway Both Beginning at the centerline of Tesla Drive, thence running northerly to the centerline of D' Arcy Parkway, an approximate distance of 1, 500 feet. Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00 p. m. to 6: 00 a. m. Prohibit parking of vehicles over 5 tons. 347
Street Side Location
Tesla Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Harlan Road, thence running easterly to the centerline of Murphy Parkway, an approximate distance of 1, 530 feet.
Tesla Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Murphy Parkway, thence running easterly to the centerline of Christopher Way, an approximate distance of 1, 900 feet. Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00 p. m. to 6: 00 a. m. Prohibit parking of vehicles over 5 tons.
O Street North Beginning at an approximate distance of 125 feet east of the centerline of Halmar Lane, thence running easterly an approximate distance of 680 feet to Fifth Street.
Prohibit parking from the hours of 8: 30 a. m. and 2: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday. Allow temporary loading/ unloading of vehicle passengers from the hours of 8: 00 a. m. and 8: 30 a. m. and 2: 30 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m., Monday through Friday.
Allow parking between the hours of 3: 00 p. m. to 8: 00 a. m., Monday through Friday and anytime on Saturday and Sunday. Prohibit parking anytime 50 feet east and west of the centerline of Matador Way.
O Street South Beginning at an approximate distance of 90 feet west from the centerline of Matador Way, thence running west an approximate distance of 40 feet.
Oberlin Avenue Both Beginning at the centerline of Marina Drive, thence running northerly to the centerline of Garden Farms Avenue, an approximate distance of 1, 400 feet.
Old Harlan Road Both Entire length, north and south of Lathrop Road.
Old Harlan Road Both Entire length south of Louise Avenue.
Old Harlan Road East Beginning at the centerline of Louise Avenue, thence running north an approximate distance of 310 feet. Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00 p. m. to 6: 00 a. m. Prohibit parking of vehicles over 5 tons.
Old Harlan Road West Beginning at an approximate distance of 100 feet south from the centerline of South Harlan Road, thence running south an approximate distance of 100 feet.
Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00p. m. to 6: 00 a. m. Prohibit parking of vehicles over 5 tons.
Paradise Road Both Entire length within city limits.
Pleasant Road Both Beginning at the centerline of Isidore Way, thence running southerly to the centerline of Folktale Way, an approximate distance of 180 feet.
Quartz Way East Beginning at the southerly boundary of 13580 Quartz Way (lot 15), thence running southerly to the northern boundary of 13590 Quartz Way (lot 14), an approximate distance of 20 feet for Emergency Vehicle Access.
Riptide Way Both Entire length.
River Islands Parkway Both Entire length within city limits.
Ro11 Tide Way Both Entire length.
Roth Road Both Entire length within city limits.
Sadler Oak Drive Both Entire length.
Sandhill Crane Road Both Entire length.
Seventh Street Both Beginning at the centerline of Fifth Street, thence running easterly along Seventh Street for an approximate distance of 600 feet.
Sierra Mar Road Both Beginning at the centerline of Barbara Terry Boulevard, thence running westerly to the centerline of Testarossa Street, an approximate distance of 175 feet.
Somerston Parkway Both Entire length.
Somerville Street Both Entire length
Spartan Way Both Beginning at the centerline of Golden Valley Parkway, thence running westerly to an approximate distance of 850 feet north of the centerline of Hidden Cove Place.
Stanford Crossing Drive Both Entire length.
Stewart Road Both Beginning at a point 550 feet north of the centerline of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks ( formerly southern Pacific Railroad tracks), thence running southerly along Stewart Road an approximate distance of 1, 450 feet to the centerline of Manthey Road.
Stonebridge Lane Both Beginning at a point that is on the east right- of- way line of Harlan Road, thence running easterly to the centerline of Slate Street, an approximate distance of 2, 400 feet.
348
Street Side Location
Thomsen Road Both Beginning at the east right- of- way of Harlan Road, thence running easterly for an approximate distance of 200 feet.
Thomsen Road South Beginning at a point approximately 200 feet east of the right- of- way of Harlan Road, thence running easterly an approximate distance of 400 feet to the centerline of Lisa Lane. Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00 p. m. to 6: 00 a. m.
Thomsen Road North Beginning at a point approximately 200 feet east of the right- of- way of Harlan Road, thence running easterly an approximate distance of 200 feet. Allow parking during the hours from 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking from 10: 00 p. m. to 6: 00 a. m.
Top of San Joaquin
River levee in RD - 17
and all levee access
points
Both Beginning at the northern city limit line, following the levee until the centerline of Manthey Road.
Towne Centre Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Manthey Road, thence westerly to the centerline of Golden Valley Parkway. Allow parking for up to two hours between 6: 00 a. m. to 10: 00 p. m. Prohibit parking between the hours of 10: 00 p. m. and 6: 00 a.m.
Towne Centre Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Golden Valley Parkway, thence running westerly an approximate distance of 400 feet.
Winton Avenue Both Entire length.
Woodfield Drive Both Beginning at the centerline of Lathrop Road, thence running northerly to the centerline of Long Barn Drive, an approximate distance of 450 feet.
Yosemite Avenue North Beginning at the centerline of McKinley Avenue, thence running easterly to city limits.
Yosemite Avenue South Both Beginning at the centerline of McKinley Avenue, thence running westerly to the centerline of Jefferson Way
Yosemite Avenue Beth Beginning 800 feet east of the right of way of State Route 120, thence running line of Jeff
rso., Was. t di . f 6 800 f +
rr
Yosemite Court Both Entire Length
The public works director is hereby directed to erect appropriate signage and/ or markings to indicate the existence of these no parking zones. In erecting signage on roads with unimproved shoulders, the signs shall be placed at the edge of the rightof- way. Until and unless appropriate signage and/ or markings are erected, no enforcement of these no parking zones shall occur. Payment for such signage shall come from account 208- 5010. (Ord. 93- 104; Ord. 99- 166; Ord. 08- 282 § 1; Ord. 09- 288 § 1; Ord. 09- 296 § 1; Ord. 10- 301 § 1; Ord. 10- 302 § 1; Ord. 11- 304 § 1; Ord. 11- 306 § 1; Ord. 11- 309 § 1; Ord. 12- 317 § 1; Ord. 13- 325 § 1; Ord. 14- 336 § 1; Ord. 17- 382 § 1; Ord. 18- 389 § 1; Ord. 20- 417 § 1; Ord. 22- 430 § 1; Ord. 24- 454, 1/ 8/ 2024; Ord. 25- 465, 4/ 14/ 2025; Ord. 25- 468, 7/ 14/ 2025) 349
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
350
ITEM 6. 1
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: APPOINTMENT OF VICE MAYOR
RECOMMENDATION: Mayor to Appoint Vice Mayor for 2026
BACKGROUND:
Chapter I " General Powers and Duties", Section F " Vice Mayor Selection", of the City Council Handbook of Rules and Procedures provides:
The Vice Mayor shall be appointed by the Mayor for a one- year term at the first meeting in December. If, in any year in which an election for Mayor of Council takes place, and the first meeting in December occurs prior to the certification of election results, then action under this section shall be delayed to the next meeting of the City Council, either regular or special."
Also as prescribed in the California Government Code § 36801:
The city council shall meet at the meeting at which the declaration of the election results for a general municipal election is made pursuant to Sections 10262 and 10263 of the Elections Code and, following the declaration of the election results and the installation of elected officials, choose one of its number as mayor, and one of its number as mayor pro tempore."
Furthermore, Chapter I " General Powers and Duties", Section E " Vice Mayor", of the City Council Handbook of Rules and Procedures provides:
In the absence of the Mayor, the Vice Mayor shall possess and perform the power and duties of the Mayor. In that capacity, the Vice Mayor shall sign ordinances and resolutions adopted in his or her presence." At this time, staff is requesting the appointment to be made by the Mayor.
SUBMITTED BY:
resa Vargas
Government Services Director
City Clerk
i
ja- itass"
Date
351
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
352
ITEM 6. 2
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
DECEMBER 8, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBER ASSIGNMENTS TO
SERVE ON OUTSIDE AGENCY BOARDS, COMMISSION
AND COMMITTEES FOR 2026
RECOMMENDATION: Mayor to Assign City Council Appointments for 2026, for Members of the City Council to Represent the City
of Lathrop on Outside Agency Boards, Commissions
and Committees
BACKGROUND:
Councilmembers serve on various outside agency boards, commissions and committees in order to represent the interests of the City of Lathrop. Chapter V, Section B( 2) of the City Council Handbook of Rules and Procedures provides: " The Mayor shall, instead of nominating, announce the appointment of the designated Councilmember as a member of a County, regional, multi - public agency, or other outside agency, at the time the matter is considered at the City Council meeting. If no motion is made by a Councilmember, immediately following the Mayor' s announcement, to submit the Mayor' sintended appointment to formal vote of the City Council, the Mayor' s announced appointment is deemed approved." The Mayor traditionally reviews these appointments each year in December, following Council reorganization, to examine whether current assignments should remain the same or if they should be changed for the upcoming year. Some assignments are made by jurisdictions that the City of Lathrop does not control. Attached to this report is a list of current appointments, some appointments require filing a Form 700 Statement of Economic Interest at the time of assuming or leaving office and annually. The Form 700 filings must be coordinated with and provided directly to the corresponding agency.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Current Mayor and Councilmember Appointments ( Assigned for 2025) SUBMITTED BY:
resa Vargas
overnment Services Director
City Clerk
Date
353
Att
achment
CITY
OF LATH
ROP
MA
YO
R
AND
COUNCILME ASSIGNMENTS MBER IN
2025
ROSTE
R
FO
R
2025
ASSI GNM ENT
S
BYMA
YO
R
AKINIO,
13,
2025"
J
ANU ARY
REGIONAL
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS
Committee
When
and
Where
Del egate
Central
Valley
Executive
Committee
League
of
California
Cities)
When:
As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Where:
Various
locations
League
Address:
1400
K
St .,
Suite
400
Sacramento,
CA
95814
Contact:
Marla
Livengo
od, Regional
Public
Affairs
Managermlivengood@calcities. org
Mayor
Akinjo
209)
747- 3734
Main
Website:
cacities. orgwww.
Council
Go ve
of
rnments (
COG)
Board
of
Directors
Form
700
Stipend: $
mon
100
thly
When:
4thThursday
of
each
month
Time:
004:
p. m
Where:
555
East
Weber
Stockton,
CA
95202
Contact:
Vanessa
Gallegos,
Office
Administrator
gallegos@sjcog. org
Mayor
Akinjo
Appointed
December
9,
2024)
San
Joaquin
Council
of
Governments
209)
235- 0577
Website:
sjcog. orgwww.
Integrated
Waste
Management
Task
Force (
Solid
Waste
Division)
When :
As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Where:
Various
locations
1810
East
Hazelton
Avenue
Sto
ckton,
CA
95202
Con
tact:
Rachel
DeBord,
Clerk
of
the
Board,
c/ o
Solid
Waste
Division
209)
468- 3066
Website:
http:// www. sjciov. org/ solidwaste/
Councilmember
Dresser
Roster
Partially
Approved
at
the
12/ 9 24, City Coun
cil
Special
Meeting;
Updated
at
the
1/3 25,
City
Coun
cil
Regu
lar
Meeting.
354
CIT
Y
LATHROPF
M
AYO
R
AND
COUNCILMEMBER
ASSIGN
MENTS IN
2025
ROSTER
FOR
2025
ASSI GNMENT
S
AYOR BYM
AKINJO, JANU
13, ARY
2025"
REGION
AL COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS
Committee
When
nda
Where
Delegate
Reclamation
District
17 Joint
Powers
Authority
When:
As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Wh
ere: Various
locations
235
EWeber
Avenue
Stockton,
CA
95202
Mailing
address:
P. O.
Box
1461
Stockton,
CA
95201- 1461
Contact:
Dante
John
Nomellini,
Special
Counsel
ngmplcspacbell .
net
Stephen
Salvatore
Website:
reclamationdistrict . https://
com/ rd17 wixsite.
San
Joaquin
County
Commission
on
Fo
Aging
rm
700
No
stipends
issued
When:
1st
Monday
of
each
month
Time:
1: 30
p. m .
Where:
San
Joaquin
County
Office
of
Education
Administration
Building,
2922
Transworld
Drive
Stockton,
CA
95206
Contact:
Carmen
Cervantes, MattyAging
Programs
Coordinator
209)
468- 1422 cervantes@s' gov. org cmattyVACANT
Accepting
Applications)
Website:
http:// www. sjgov. org
San
Joaquin
Partnership
Board
Directoof
rs
When:
4thThursday
of
each
month
Time:
8: 00
a. m
Where:
2800
W.
March
Lane,
Suite
470
Stockton,
CA
95219
Mailing
Address:
2431
W.
March
Lane,
Suite
103
Stockto
n,
CA
95207
Co
ntact:
Rene
Armendariz Executive
Assistantrene@sanjoaauinusa. orq
Stephen
Salvatore
209)
956- 3380
Website: sanjoaquinpartnership. comwww.
Roste
r ApprovPartially
ed
at
the
12/ 9 24, City
Council
Special
Meetin
g;
Updated
at
the
1/3/ 25,
City
Coun
cil
Regu
lar
Meeting.
355
OPATHR
CITY
OF L
MA
YOR
AND
COUNCILMEMBER
ASSIGN
MENTS IN
2025
ROSTER
FO
R
2025
ASSI
GNMENTS
BY
AYOR
M
AKINJO,
ANUARY J
13,
2025"
REGIONAL COMMITTEE
APP
OINTMENTS
Committee Wh
and Wheren
e el
D
egate
San
Joaquin
Valley
Pollution
Air
Control
District
Special
City
Selection
Committee
When:
As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Where:
4800
Enterprise
Way
Modesto,
CA
95356- 8718
Co
ntact: Katrina
Rojas
Deputy
Clerk
of
the
Boards
1990
E. Gettysburg
A
venue
Fresno,
CA
93726
katrina. rojas© valleyair. org
Councilmember
Dresser
559)
230- 6038
Website:
www .
valleyair .
org
San
Joaquin
County
Water
Advisory
Commission Form
700 Nostipends
issued
When : 3rdWednesday
of
each
month
001:
pm
Time:
3011:
a. m
to
001:
p .
m .
with
a
Brown
B
agfrom
1: 00
p. m to
3: 00
p. m
Where:
San
Joaquin
County
RobertJ.
Cabral
Agricultural
Center
2101
E.
EarhartAvenue #
100
Stockton,
CA
95206
Con ta
ct:
Rachel
DeBord,
Clerk
of
the
Board
c/ o
Water Adv
isory
Commission
Website:
www. sjwater.
org
Vice
Mayor
Torres -
O' Callaghan
Tri
Valley -
San
Joaquin
Valley
Regional
Rail
Authority
Board
of
FoDirectors
rm
700
Nostipen
ds
When : issued
2ndWednesday
of
each
month
Time:
2: 00
p. m
to
4: 00
p.
Where : m.Various Locatio
ns
Contact:
Kevin
Sheridan,
Executive
Director
ksheridan@vallevlinkrail. com
Mayor
Akinjo
925)
784- 2759
Website:
https://
www.
valleylinkrail. com/
Roster
Partially
Approved
at
the
12/ 9 24, City Co
uncil
Special
Meeting;
Updated
at
the
1/3 25,
City
Council
Regu
lar
Meeting.
356
CIT
Y
ATHROP OF L
MA
YOR COUNCILMEMBER AND ASSIGN
MENTS IN
2025
ROSTE
R
FOR
202
5 ASSIGNMENTS
AYOR BYM
AKINJO,
ARY
JANU
13,
2025"
GION COMMITTEE
RE
AL APP
OINTMENTS
Committee Wh
ndena
Wh
er
e
Delegat
e
San
Are
Joaquin
a
Flood
Control
Agency (
SJAFCA) -
TwoBoard
Members
Required
Form
700
No
stipends
issued
2nd
Wh
en: Tuesday
of
each
month
Time:
1: 00
p. m
Wh
ere: San
Joaquin
Area
Flood
Control
Agency
555
E.
Weber
Stockton,
Ave.
CA
95202
usi
SJCng
OG
Board
Room)
Cont
act: Darren
Suen,
Dir
ector
Leanne
Randall,
Administrative
Assistant
Ieanne. randall© asjafca. org
Councilmember
Dresser
Councilmember
Lazard
350)
333- 1146
Website:
https:// www. sjafca. org/
Ava Community
Energy (
formerly
East
Bay Community
Energy)
October
24,
2023,
East
Bay Community
Energy became
Ava Community
Energy.
City
of
Lathrop
joined
August
2023
Ord
23- 447)
Form
700
123. 55
for
each
Board
Meeting
When:
3rdWednesday
of
each
month
Time:
6: 00
p. m
Where:
1999
Harrison
St .,
Suite
2300
Oakland,
CA
94607
Contact:
Alex
DiGiorgio,
Sr.
Manager
adigiorgio© avaenergy. org
Councilmember
Diallo
510)
993- 7562
Adrian
Bankhead abankhead@avaenergy. org avaenergy. Website: https:// org/
Or
https:// avaenergy. org/ meetings/
Roster
Partially
Approved
at
the
12/ 9 24, City Coun
cil
Special
Meeting;
Updated
at
the
1/3 25,
City
Coun
cil Regular
Meeting.
357
CITY
OF
ROP
LATH
MAYOR
AND
COUNCILMEMBER
ASSIGNMENTS IN
2025
OSTE
R
R
ORF
2025
ASSIGNMENTS
BY
MAYOR
AKINJ J
ANUARY O,
13,
2025"
ST
DING COMMITTEES AN
Committee
Wh
en
and
Wher
e el
D
egat e
City
of
Manteca &
City
of
Lathrop
2x2
Meetings
Whe
Asn: needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Where:
TBD
May
or
Akinjo
Lathrop
Manteca
FireDepartment &
City
of
Lathrop
2x2
Meetings
Whe
Asn: needed
iTme:
As
scheduled
Where:
TBD
Councilmember
Diallo
Appointed
September
9,
2024)
Manteca
Unified
School
District &
City
of
Lathrop
2x2
Meetings
When: As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled Where : TBD
Contact:
Superintendent' s
Office -
Admin
Councilmember
Diallo
Banta
Elementary
School
District &
City
of
Lathrop
2x2
Meetings
When:
As
needed
iTme:
As
scheduled
Where:
TBD
Vice
Mayor
Torres -
O' Callaghan
Lathro Econop
Deve
mic
lopment Review
Committee
2 -
City
Councilmember
Committee
When :
As
needed
Time:
As
scheduled
Where:
TBD
Vice
Mayor
TorresO' Callaghan
JURISDICTIONA
NOMINATIONS L
Committee
When
an
d
Whe
re
Delegat
e
San
Joaquin
County
Local
Agency
Formation
Commission (
LAFCo)
OnMay
1,
1991,
the
City
Selection
Committee
adopted
a
4 -
Year PlanRotation
for
regular
City
members. FoCommission
m
700
Stipend: $
100
monthly
When:
2ndThursday
of
each
month
Time:
9: 00
a.
m.
Where:
Board
ofSupervisors
Chambers
44 North
San
Joaquin
Stre
et,
6th
Floor
Stockton,
California
95202
Contact:
Mitzi
Stites - (
209)
468- 3197
mstites( asjgov. org
Councilmember
Diallo
Term:
May
2023
through
May
2027
g
Website: httos://
www. siciov.
org/ commission/ lafcolhome
Roster
Partially
Approved
at
the
12/ 9 24, City Coun
cil
Specia
lMeeting;
Updated
at
the
1/3 25,
City
Council
Regular
Mee
ting.
358
OP
CITY
OF LATHR
M
AYOR AND
COUNCILMEMBE
R
ASSIGNMENTS
IN
2025
ROSTE
R
FOR
2025
ASSI
GNMENTS BY
M
AYAKINJO,RJ
ANUARY
13 ,
2025"
JURISDICTION
AL NOMIN
ATIONS
Committee Wh
and
Where en
Del egat e
San
Joaquin
Regional
Rail The San Joaqu RegionaCommission in RalCommission' ilsJoi nt Powe rsAgreement
requires
theSaJoan
quin
Council
of
G
overnments
to
appoint
Rail
Commissioners San Joaquin Cou
from
nty.
Commissioners onlycan
be
locally
elected
officials
presently
serving agon
City
Council
or
the
Board Supervof
isors.
Form
700
When:
1st
Friday
of
each
month
Tim
e: 9: 30
a .
m.
Where:
949
East
Channel
Street
Stockton,
CA
95202
il
T
t
tac:
Ariana
Talo
sig - (
209 )
944- 6234
ata
Iosig(
a
s'
rrc. com
Jurisdictional appointment
by
SJCOG)
Website:
http:// s. rrc .
com
Council
ofGovernments (
COG)
Executive
Committee
The
Executive
Committee
is
a
subset
of
the
Board
of
Directors,
with
members. 6
See
more
here:
http:// www. sicoa ora/ 150Executive-Committee.
SJCOG
When:
3rdThursday
of
each
m
onth
Time:
1: 00
p .
m.
Where:
555
East
Weber
Stockton,
CA
95202
Contact:
Vanessa
Gallegos,
Office
Administrator
gallegos( asjcog. orq
J
urisdictio nal appointm
ent
by
Ag
ency) Mayor
Akinjo Chair
with
term
endi
ng
J
une
30,
2025.
This
is
the
unexpired t
erm
left
by
Form
er
May
or
Dhaliwal)
staff
provides
recommendations
to
the
Board
regarding
thevacancies
during
their
February *(
appoi
nted
meeting.
There
is
no
strict
rotationamong
the
member
agencies,
as
staff
recognizes
the
vagaries
of
elections,
term
limits,
and
the
personal
and
professional
commitments
of
our
members.
board
Form
700
San
Joaquin
Council
of
Governments
209)
235- 0600
Website:
sjcog. orgwww.
Roster
Partially
Approved
at
the
12/ 9 24, City
Council
Special
Meeting;
Updated
at
the
1/3/ 25,
City
Cou
ncil
Regular
Meetin g.
359
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
360