Cities Index.
item_5.5_council_chamber_security_improvements

Lathrop City Council
September 14, 2026

Document
item_5.5_council_chamber_security_improvements
Meeting
September 14, 2026
Body
Lathrop City Council
Original file
442 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.ci.lathrop.ca.us. That file is the official record.

CITY OF LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SECURITY IMPROVEMENT

OPTIONS

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 | ITEM 5.5
1 2

PURPOSE
 Review security enhancement options
 Maintain public accessibility
 Support employee and visitor safety
 Receive Council direction
3 EXISTING CONDITIONS

CURRENT FACILITY FEATURES
 Electronic access-controlled staff-only areas
 Operational law enforcement presence during Council meetings  Open design
4 WHY REVIEW OPTIONS
WHY REVIEW ENHANCEMENTS?
 Evolving public facility standards
 Increased focus on elected official safety
 Improved access management technologies available
 Opportunity for proactive modernization
5 OPTIONS
OPTION 1
Law Enforcement Personnel and K9 Officer
Presence
Features
 Law enforcement presence
 K9 officer provides an added layer of security
 Least invasive to the public
Considerations
 Limited K9 law enforcement personnel
 All LPD K9 officers may not be suited to the specific purpose to respond to all types of threats
 Additional law enforcement personnel recommended
K9 Kane and LPD Handler
K9 Jackie and LPD Handler
6 OPTIONS
OPTION 2
Hand-Held (“Wand”) Screening
Features
 Screening can be administered by law enforcement
personnel
 Provides enhanced detection accuracy with adjustable
sensitivity
 Portable and cost-effective
Considerations
 More invasive to public meeting attendees
 Potential delays to entry
 Additional law enforcement personnel recommended
 Minimal one-time costs for equipment
Wand Screening by Security
Guard
Hand-Held (“Wand”) Metal
Detector
7 OPTIONS
OPTION 3
Mobile Walk-Through Metal Detector and
Secondary Hand-Held (“Wand”) Screening
Features
 Provides additional security during public meetings
 Mobile and portable
Considerations
 Potential delays to entry
 Additional law enforcement personnel recommended
 Increased one-time costs for equipment
Mobile Walk-Through Metal Detector
8 OPTIONS
OPTION 4
Walk-Through Metal Detector, Bag
Screening, and Secondary Hand-Held
(“Wand”) Screening
Features
 Provides the most security during public meetings
Considerations
 Potential delays to entry
 Faculties improvements required
 Additional law enforcement personnel recommended
 Extensive costs associated with improvements and
equipment
Council Chambers Entrance with Bag Screening
and Walk-Through Metal Detectors
9 COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY
Cost Estimates Summary
 Option 1 - Law Enforcement Personnel and K9 Officer Presence  Estimated ongoing overtime costs
 3 officers @ 165.04/hour, for 3 hours - $1,486.26/meeting  Option 2 - Hand-Held (“Wand”) Screening
 Estimated equipment costs
 Hand-held “wand” metal detectors $200-$500/per metal detector - $1,000  Estimated ongoing overtime costs
 3 officers @ 165.04/hour, for 3 hours - $1,486.26/meeting 10 COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY
Cost Estimates Summary
 Option 3 - Mobile Walk-Through Metal Detector and Secondary Hand-Held (“Wand”) Screening  Estimated equipment costs
 Mobile walk-through metal detector $5,000-$10,000 per metal detector and hand-held “wand” metal detectors - $10,000
 Estimated ongoing overtime costs
 3 officers @ 165.04/hour, for 3 hours - $1,486.26/meeting  Option 4 -Walk-Through Metal Detector, Bag Screening, and Secondary Hand-Held (“Wand”) Screening
 Estimated equipment costs
 Walk-through metal detector, bag screening equipment, and hand-held “wand” metal detectors, including facility upgrades - $15,000-$100,000
 Estimated ongoing overtime costs
 3 officers @ 165.04/hour, for 3 hours - $1,486.26/meeting 11 COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY
Overtime Cost Estimate Summary
 Staffing all City meetings – estimated 2 hours* per meeting  Youth Advisory – approximately $990.24/meeting
 Park & Recreation Commission – approximately $990.24/meeting  Senior Advisory - approximately $990.24/meeting
 Planning Commission - approximately $990.24/meeting
 Measure C (Quarterly) - approximately $990.24/meeting  Fire Board - approximately $990.24/meeting
 City Council – approximately $1,485.36/meeting
12 COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY
Overtime Cost Estimate Summary
 Total estimated costs
 Monthly – $6,436.56 (non-Measure C meeting month) - $7,426.80 (includes Measure C)  Yearly - $63,375.36 additional overtime cost
 Yearly total overtime costs (includes City Council meetings) - $81,199.68  City Council meetings current estimated costs - $17,824.32 13 ADDITIONAL SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
Additional security considerations to work in conjunction with presented options:
 City Hall Safety Improvements
 Safety Glass and Controlled Access
 Protective safety glass at counters
 Controlled staff access doors
 Enhanced separation between public and staff areas
 Contract for improvements expected to be brought to Council October 12, 2026 14 COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
Staff Requests Council Direction Regarding:
 Preferred enhancement approach
 Desired scope of improvements
 Authorization for staff to:
 If Option 1-3 selected:
 Authorization for Staff to move forward with implementation of selected option  If Option 4 selected:
 Authorization for staff to return with:
 Detailed cost estimates
 Design concepts
 Implementation timelines
QUESTIONS?
15 Chief Stephen Sealy
Lathrop Police Department
[email protected]
209.647.6403

← All documents from this meeting